More annual reports from Legg Mason Inc.:
2017 ReportPeers and competitors of Legg Mason Inc.:
Westwood Holdings GroupAR2015 EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES One should learn to sail in all winds. — Italian proverb Our Investment Affiliates Key Highlights $703 BILLION Assets under management as of March 31, 2015 $2.8 BILLION Operating revenues By asset class 54% Fixed Income By client domicile 64% U.S. By asset class 47% Equity 38% Fixed Income 18% Liquidity 28% Equity 36% Elsewhere 4% Liquidity 11% Alternatives Financial Highlights (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Operating results Operating revenues Operating income (loss) Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 $ 2,819,106 2,741,757 2,612,650 2,662,574 2,784,317 498,219 430,893 (434,499) 338,753 386,808 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision (benefit) 367,993 419,641 (510,607) 303,083 365,197 Net income (loss) attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 237,080 284,784 (353,327) 220,817 253,923 Adjusted income(1) Per share Net income (loss), diluted Adjusted income, diluted (1) Dividends declared Book value Financial condition Total assets Total stockholders’ equity 378,751 417,805 347,169 397,030 439,248 $ 2.04 3.26 0.64 2.33 3.41 0.52 (2.65) 2.61 0.44 1.54 2.77 0.32 1.63 2.83 0.20 40.23 40.32 38.44 40.59 38.41 $ 7,073,977 7,111,349 7,269,660 8,555,747 8,707,756 4,484,901 4,724,724 4,818,351 5,677,291 5,770,384 (1) Adjusted income per diluted share represents a performance measure that is based on a methodology other than generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”). For more information regarding this non-GAAP financial measure, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this Annual Report. Total Return Performance (Dollars) Index Legg Mason, Inc. SNL Asset Manager Index S&P 500 250 200 150 100 50 0 MAR 10 MAR 11 MAR 12 MAR 13 MAR 14 MAR 15 Years Ended March 31, 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 126.62 117.03 115.65 99.14 114.39 125.52 116.04 146.92 143.05 179.45 204.53 184.94 174.31 201.65 196.50 The graph to the left compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Legg Mason’s common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index over the same period (assuming the investment of $100 in each on March 31, 2010). The SNL Asset Manager Index consists of 41 asset management firms. Source: © 2015 SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA (www.snl.com) About Legg Mason Global asset management firm FOUNDED IN 1899 Headquartered in BALTIMORE, MD, USA Listed as a public company for 32 YEARS Our global network 31 LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE Nearly 3000 EMPLOYEES Dear clients and fellow shareholders, I am pleased to report another year of important financial and strategic progress for our Legg Mason. My Affiliate and corporate Legg Mason colleagues have successfully delivered a year of growth in revenue, anchored by positive long-term flows. Most importantly, the investment performance that we have delivered for our clients broadly remains strong, with over 80% of strategy AUM beating benchmarks for the critically important three, five and 10 year time periods. Building upon this success will take continued hard work and discipline. I know that I speak for all at Legg Mason when I say that we embrace both the responsibility and the challenge associated with the pursuit of continuous improvement. Joseph A. Sullivan, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Opportunities for those firms that can respond to this dynamic landscape are plentiful. We are fortunate to have the right people, culture and mission and a business model that adapts as our industry is being redefined. Ours is a Company that has been created, over many years, for just this purpose and for just this moment; we accept this important responsibility and we are committed to seizing the opportunity before us. As we look ahead, we see an industry in the midst of substantial challenge and change and we believe Legg Mason is very well positioned to perform and succeed for all of our critical stakeholders. The people of Legg Mason have long embraced a “client first” culture, while recognizing that we are stewards of our shareholders’ capital. These two ideals are not at all in conflict but are, instead, complementary. What makes us so confident? In a world rife with conflict, and markets characterized by increasing volatility and uncertainty, investors are demanding more. They expect…and deserve…to know that those they have entrusted with their financial future have their best interests foremost in mind. And it is our mission, investing to improve lives, which ultimately ties together our people, our culture and our model, in pursuit of delivering exceptional results for our stakeholders. The confluence of need and opportunity make this an important and exciting time for our Legg Mason. Legg Mason AR2015 3 About Legg Mason Global asset management firm FOUNDED IN 1899 Headquartered in BALTIMORE, MD, USA Listed as a public company for 32 YEARS Our global network 31 LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE Nearly 3000 EMPLOYEES Dear clients and fellow shareholders, I am pleased to report another year of important financial and strategic progress for our Legg Mason. My Affiliate and corporate Legg Mason colleagues have successfully delivered a year of growth in revenue, anchored by positive long-term flows. Most importantly, the investment performance that we have delivered for our clients broadly remains strong, with over 80% of strategy AUM beating benchmarks for the critically important three, five and 10 year time periods. Building upon this success will take continued hard work and discipline. I know that I speak for all at Legg Mason when I say that we embrace both the responsibility and the challenge associated with the pursuit of continuous improvement. Joseph A. Sullivan, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Opportunities for those firms that can respond to this dynamic landscape are plentiful. We are fortunate to have the right people, culture and mission and a business model that adapts as our industry is being redefined. Ours is a Company that has been created, over many years, for just this purpose and for just this moment; we accept this important responsibility and we are committed to seizing the opportunity before us. As we look ahead, we see an industry in the midst of substantial challenge and change and we believe Legg Mason is very well positioned to perform and succeed for all of our critical stakeholders. The people of Legg Mason have long embraced a “client first” culture, while recognizing that we are stewards of our shareholders’ capital. These two ideals are not at all in conflict but are, instead, complementary. What makes us so confident? In a world rife with conflict, and markets characterized by increasing volatility and uncertainty, investors are demanding more. They expect…and deserve…to know that those they have entrusted with their financial future have their best interests foremost in mind. And it is our mission, investing to improve lives, which ultimately ties together our people, our culture and our model, in pursuit of delivering exceptional results for our stakeholders. The confluence of need and opportunity make this an important and exciting time for our Legg Mason. Legg Mason AR2015 3 The confluence of need and opportunity make this an important and exciting time for our Legg Mason. A year of continuous improvement For fiscal year 2015, we delivered our second consecutive year of growth in both our operating revenues and adjusted operating margin, even while making significant investments in our Global Distribution Platform, which we believe will increase sales and persistency of Assets Under Management in the long run. We continue to lead the industry in the rate of return of capital to shareholders, spending over $350 million to repurchase our shares during fiscal year 2015, while increasing our dividend rate by 23%. We took several strategic actions during the year, consistent with building a better Legg Mason. First, we added QS Investors, a quantitative multi-asset class solutions provider, which when combined with Batterymarch Financial and Legg Mason Global Asset Allocation, creates a powerful quantitative manager in the rapidly growing “solutions” category. Next, we added Edinburgh, Scotland-based Martin Currie to provide us with a non-U.S. equity platform, filling a longstanding investment capability need for Legg Mason and our clients. QS and Martin Currie are terrific firms, with highly talented professionals, who share our core cultural tenets and make us better. We are thrilled that they have joined our family of Affiliates. We divested our wealth management Affiliate, Legg Mason Investment Counsel, which no longer fit within our strategic vision. We are grateful for the contributions of the team over the years and know that their new ownership is a better platform for promoting their growth. We also took advantage of historically low interest rates to extend our debt and lock in low long-term rates, a move we believe will look very prescient over the long term. We were extremely pleased that our debt offerings were so well received in the marketplace, reflecting the attractiveness of Legg Mason as a credit to lenders. Capping it all, we achieved nearly $17 billion in long-term inflows. This was the first year of positive net long-term flows in the past eight and an improvement approaching $50 billion in just two years…a breathtaking performance at a time when flows for active managers were meaningfully challenged. Our global distribution platform was broadly positive in flows across clients, channels and geographies, highlighting the importance of the diversification we currently enjoy and are working to extend. Legg Mason’s culture of respect: An important differentiator Legg Mason has long enjoyed a special culture that reflects a deep respect for our many stakeholders. One core element of that culture we define as “No Chalk.” Evolved over 100 years of serving investors, “No Chalk” is understood and practiced worldwide by all Legg Mason colleagues. It expresses the expectation that we conduct our business well “in-bounds,” never so much as nearing the “out of bounds” chalk lines of unethical territory. 4 Legg Mason AR2015 This culture has been protected, passionately and without compromise, throughout many challenging market environments and remains a bedrock of the Company today. It is my job…and that of all Legg Mason employees…to take this “client first” culture, so engrained in the Company’s corporate DNA, and extend it in an even more proactive fashion. This “No Chalk” mindset and our unique business model position us to best serve the evolving financial needs of our clients with new and differentiated solutions in an increasingly interconnected and complex world. Another of our core cultural elements recognizes that we are stewards of our shareholder’s capital. Over the past two years, we have undertaken productivity training, embracing six-sigma concepts to ensure that Legg Mason operates with a high degree of efficiency and effectiveness. As our CFO, Pete Nachtwey, likes to remind our colleagues: We all must hold dear our shareholders’ checkbooks! Like “No Chalk,” this cost-stewardship mentality has embedded itself in our corporate DNA. These are two of the cultural characteristics that define and guide Legg Mason in pursuit of our mission to improve the lives of our clients through investing. The Legg Mason Model: A competitive advantage We are firmly committed to our “best of both worlds” business model to deliver optimal results for both our clients and shareholders. A few other firms embrace the “multi-manager” model…but none execute it as uniquely as Legg Mason. We are a pure-play asset manager. We honor the investment independence and operating autonomy of our Affiliates, while offering world class retail distribution, product development and certain other shared services on a centralized basis. This yields meaningful advantages of scale. Executive Committee (Left to right) Ursula Schliessler, Chief Administrative Officer Pete Nachtwey, Chief Financial Officer Tom Hoops, Head of Business Development Joe Sullivan, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Tom Merchant, General Counsel Terry Johnson, Head of Global Distribution 5 Legg Mason AR2015 This model, combining the best of what multi-managers and integrated firms have to offer, affords the benefits of scale without the investment mediocrity that can often accompany it — hence the “best of both worlds.” This model increasingly resonates with investors and potential new Affiliates. A critical component of our multi-Affiliate model is the diversification of our business. We continue to diversify our business investments across asset classes and over a multitude of client channels and geographies. This purposefully avoids leaving us dependent upon any single investment strategy or market. It is likely that we may often have one or more Affiliate or asset classes performing well, while others might be challenged. We firmly believe that such a diversified business delivers better results for both clients and shareholders through market cycles. Critical to the successful execution of our business model is a foundation rooted in mutual accountability. We recognize the symbiotic relationship we enjoy with our Affiliates but it is our mutual commitment to accountability to one another that drives execution and results. Legg Mason intends to be the firm of choice for investors globally, for current and future Affiliates, and for talented professionals. Exceptional execution of our model will make this intention a reality. While not perfected…we have significantly improved the execution of our model; to that end, we are seeing significantly heightened interest in Legg Mason by investors, asset managers and professionals. A clear and enduring mission for Legg Mason is essential We aspire to be a great global company in the asset management business that, through investing, meaningfully impacts the lives of all the constituencies with whom we interact. That’s a tall order but one with a consequential purpose. Reaching high and declaring bold ambitions are only meaningful if we deliver ...and we eagerly accept that accountability. Environmental, Social and Governance Investing — ESG More investors each day are coming to believe that focusing on ESG principles can help deliver what everyone wants: superior, risk-adjusted performance over the long term. Assets under management in ESG investments are growing steadily, as both the number and type of options increase across asset classes. Some large global consulting firms have even explicitly incorporated ESG into their investment belief statements. ESG investing has moved far beyond its origins in the late 1800s, when it was primarily a way for religious organizations to avoid owning “sin stocks.” The emphasis now is on actively finding companies with quality attributes — environmental and product safety, workforce diversity, employee retention and strong corporate governance — that can positively impact future shareholder value. ESG choices have grown not only in AUM but in sheer variety. These include everything from index and smart beta funds to quant strategies and different approaches to shareholder engagement. Entire asset allocations can be constructed consistent with ESG principles, including public and private equity, fixed income and alternative assets. At ClearBridge Investments, all companies considered for investment are given an ESG rating, updated annually. Likewise, at Martin Currie, governance and sustainability considerations are fully integrated into the investment process. This can be collaborative: portfolio managers work with companies that want to improve ESG performance through direct engagement and proxy voting. ClearBridge Investments, Martin Currie and Permal are all signatories to the Principals for Responsible Investment, reflecting the importance of that commitment. 6 Legg Mason AR2015 We aspire to be a great global company in the asset management business that, through investing, meaningfully impacts the lives of all the constituencies with whom we interact. We must act proactively and “invest to improve the lives” of our constituents; adding to and strengthening our deep corporate “No Chalk” culture with a mission, a purpose…a “why?”... that drives everything we do, every day. And this “why?” — combined with an emphasis on execution excellence — is what will distinguish Legg Mason in both the short term and over the long run, making us an enduring global leader in asset management. We are sober about the challenges we will face, as we execute against this standard: it requires a sensitive balancing of a delicate ecosystem to achieve success. Multiple constituencies must be satisfied: clients, regulators, shareholders and bondholders, along with our employees and the communities in which we operate. All have a stake in the outcomes we deliver and our success as a firm. The themes we have chosen for this and our past two Annual Reports have been quite intentional. Two years ago we declared that we could only succeed if we moved “Forward Together” and we have done just that. This year, we pursue “Expanding Opportunities.” Our goal is to make this happen for our multiple constituencies, starting with clients and ultimately ending with my Legg Mason colleagues. We intend to deliver. Expanding opportunities is about enriching the lives of our stakeholders through the exceptional execution of our business, investing in the careers of our employees, engaging in activities that strengthen our communities, and building a strong and lasting Legg Mason for us all. Expanding opportunities for this ecosystem and investing to improve the lives of all within it is our deepest passion, our driving force and our lasting commitment. On behalf of all of my colleagues at Legg Mason, I am grateful that you are joining us on this important journey. I thank you for your continued trust and support and please know that we are committed to continue earning both in this coming year and beyond. Last year, we recognized that we were “Building Momentum” and we clearly are. Joseph A. Sullivan, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer 7 Legg Mason AR2015 Global value investing Pursuing value since 1986 across equity and fixed income, globally and in the U.S. Historically institutionally focused, the firm has both a boutique’s agility and an industry leader’s stability and resources. 2 10 12 Assets by strategy (%) Fixed Income Diversified Equity Large Cap Equity Small/Mid Cap Equity 76 Brandywine Global experienced growth in fiscal 2015 while continuing to focus on culture and reinvestment in the business. Assets under management over the year increased by more than 25% to $66.5 billion, as of March 31, 2015 — the highest level in firm history. By the close of the fiscal year, the firm experienced its fourteenth consecutive quarter of asset growth, added 37 talented professionals to our team, and earned a “Best Places to Work” award from The Philadelphia Business Journal. To broaden the investor base with which it can partner, Brandywine launched seven new hedge fund, UCITS, or mutual fund vehicles. Brandywine’s asset base remains globally diversified with over 42% of AUM originating from over 50 countries outside of the U.S. and more than 75% of AUM being managed in global mandates. We are one of the world’s largest asset managers. We have a local presence in 31 cities around the globe, serving individual and institutional investors located in 190 countries across six continents. Our global distribution network, combined with our diverse family of specialized investment managers, creates a strong platform to deliver performance. 8 Legg Mason AR2015 Quality-focused equity Global investment manager with over 50 years of experience and long-tenured portfolio managers who seek to build income, high active share or low volatility portfolios. Active equity specialists An active equity specialist that builds global, stock-driven portfolios based on fundamental research, devoting all of its resources to delivering optimum investment outcomes and superior client relationships. 18 Assets by product type (%) High Active Share Income Solutions Low Volatility 23 59 Assets by strategy (%) Diversified Equity Small Cap Equity 3 97 ClearBridge Investments is an established global investment manager focusing on active stock selection that is guided by proprietary, bottom-up research. With over 50 years of experience building client portfolios, long- tenured portfolio managers provide strong leadership in a centralized investment structure. Consistently strong investment performance helped ClearBridge extend its market leadership position across its platform of high active share, income and low volatility strategies. During the fiscal year, ClearBridge’s Aggressive Growth Strategy won numerous Lipper country awards and ClearBridge was named one of Pension & Investments’ “Best Places to Work in Money Management” for the third year in a row. ClearBridge remains focused on delivering a distinguished client experience and on building new investment strategies intended to help investors achieve their goals. Martin Currie joined Legg Mason in October 2014 as our international active equity specialist. Headquartered in Edinburgh, the firm is driven by investment expertise and focused on managing money for a wide range of global institutional and retail clients. Martin Currie is innovative in its approach and able to take a long-term view. The firm offers high conviction investment strategies that are distinctive and based on detailed in-depth fundamental research. As part of Legg Mason, Martin Currie accesses new markets and client segments through its global retail distribution network. Martin Currie also successfully integrated Legg Mason’s Australian Equities team into its company, creating Martin Currie Australia, with the goal of being one of the leading investors in Australia. Martin Currie Australia, with total AUM of A$4.6 billion (US$3.6 billion) as of March 31, 2015, is attracting clients from both Australia and Japan. 9 Legg Mason AR2015Global alternative funds-of-funds A global pioneer in multi-manager, multi-strategy alternative investing. The firm has made investments in new and established hedge fund managers across strategies, asset classes and regions since 1973. Quantitative equity and multi-asset manager Applies a diversified, systematic and adaptive approach to its investment discipline to provide consistent, repeatable and risk-managed returns across multiple market environments. 9 3 1 20 21 25 21 Multi-manager funds’ assets by strategy (%) Global Macro Global Long/Short Event Driven Fixed Income Thematic Equity Long Cash/Other Total AUM by product (%) 36 Customized Solutions Global Equities U.S. Equities Liquid Alternatives 13 25 26 Permal Group is a pioneer in multi-manager, multi- strategy alternative investing. Established in 1973, the firm has offices in nine international financial centers and extensive networks of experienced managers and relationships around the globe. Permal is recognized for hedge fund investments across strategies, asset classes and regions. The year saw some sizeable institutional wins, including a billion dollar mandate from a U.S. pension fund, along with encouraging growth in the Chinese and Korean markets. There were new products covering the liquidity spectrum, with the launch of a variable insurance trust portfolio for a key distributor, as well as the launch of Permal’s latest longer lock-up fund. On the managed account platform (PMAP), which at over $9 billion ranked 3rd overall, and is the largest buyside platform,1 Permal was among the first asset managers to create an ICAV onshore structure for a number of its BVI offshore accounts. 1 InvestHedge: Investor activity in hedge funds, 1 March 2015. 10 QS Investors partners with clients to create innovative solutions within a quantitative framework. Taking a consultative approach to global asset management, they apply a diversified, systematic and adaptive approach to managing portfolios with a repeatable, risk-aware process. Strategies include global equities, liquid alternatives, multi-asset and customized solutions. Fiscal year 2015 was a notable year for QS Investors. The combination of QS Investors’ innovative multi- asset and solutions platform with Legg Mason’s strong distribution capabilities and diversified multi- affiliate model produced substantial momentum under the leadership of Adam Petryk, Head of Multi- Asset and Solutions. Working with larger institutional clients, the team has just begun to expand the business across Target Date, Lifestyle and other Outcome-Oriented strategies. Meanwhile, equity performance has been strong, demonstrating the benefits of QS Investors’ systematic, diversified and adaptive approach to investing. Looking ahead, CIO Rosy Macedo is driving the firm forward with new alternative equity strategies that directly address market volatility and an investor’s need for growth. Legg Mason AR2015Small-cap equity Known for its disciplined, value-oriented approach to managing small-caps. An asset class pioneer, the firm’s founder is one of the longest-tenured active managers. Fixed income One of the world’s leading global fixed income managers. Founded in 1971, the firm is known for team management, proprietary research and a long-term fundamental value approach. Assets by strategy (%) U.S. Equity Rest of the World Equity European Equity Cash and Cash Equivalents 3 4 7 86 Total AUM by mandate (%) Specialized Mandates Taxable Liquidity/ Enhanced Cash Broad Portfolio Municipals 46 5 21 28 For more than 40 years, Royce & Associates, investment advisor to The Royce Funds, has focused on small-cap portfolios. Royce’s portfolio managers use disciplined, consistent investment approaches that emphasize close attention to risk. CEO Chuck Royce is one of the pioneers in small-cap value investing and enjoys one of the longest tenures of any active manager. Royce strengthened its executive leadership team during fiscal year 2015. On January 1 Chris Clark and Francis Gannon, who together have more than 40 years of investment industry experience, became Co-CIOs. In July, Chris Clark became President while Chuck remains Royce Chairman and CEO. In December, Peter Hoglund joined as Principal, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer. Fund and manager recognitions included: Royce Opportunity Fund added to the Money 50 List, Morningstar listed Royce Micro-Cap Trust among the best-performing closed end equity funds for 2013, and Chuck mentioned in Morningstar’s “The Few, the Proud, the 30-Year Veterans With Good Results.” Roycefunds.com was ranked #1 in Kasina’s annual Top Mutual Fund Websites for Financial Intermediaries report. The marketing team also received MFEA’s coveted Overall Communications award. Western Asset Management is one of the world’s leading fixed income managers. With a focus on long-term fundamental value investing that employs a top-down and bottom-up approach, the firm has nine offices around the globe and deep experience across the range of fixed income sectors. Founded in 1971, Western Asset’s approach emphasizes team management and intensive proprietary research, supported by robust risk management. Strong investment performance at Western Asset garnered recognition from prestigious industry sources in the fiscal year. Institutional Investor Magazine named Western Asset a repeat winner as U.S. Fixed-Income Core Manager of the Year, and expanded the distinction to the Core Plus strategy for 2014. The Firm was also named Morningstar’s 2014 Fixed-Income U.S. Fund Manager of the Year for the Core and Core Plus Funds.† To meet investor need for absolute return and unconstrained fixed income products, Western Asset launched the High-Yield Credit Energy Fund and the Global Total Return strategy, and celebrated the Macro Opportunities strategy reaching $6 billion in AUM. Not only did Western Asset receive recognition for its investment expertise, it was named to Pension & Investments’ 2014 “Best Places to Work in Money Management.” † Awarded to Ken Leech, Carl Eichstaedt, and Mark Lindbloom for Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WACSX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund (WAPSX) named Morningstar 2014 U.S. Fixed Income Manager of the Year, United States of America. Morningstar Awards 2015 © Morningstar, Inc. 11 Legg Mason AR2015PRODUCT & DISTRIBUTION As we look to the future, we know one thing — the needs of investors will be more complex and more diverse. Around the world, retail investors will need to take a more active role in their financial futures to meet their goals. We intend to lead the way, in conjunction with our distribution partners, to help them meet those myriad needs. Respondents to Legg Mason’s Global Investment Survey of individuals with $200,000 or more in investible assets, not including their home, identified reasons both practical and personal for their investment and cited a number of factors that could impact achieving those goals. the borders of regional geographies in new and different ways to achieve their investment objectives. Findings like this have significant implications for how we view our portfolio of investment affiliates, how we work with those affiliates on new product initiatives and how we manage our current product offering. It also informs how we engage with clients, how we use technology and data to better understand their needs, and how we partner with intermediaries to serve them. One theme is clear — investors face volatile markets and an interconnected and, at times, challenging global economy as they look to build financial security. They need to consider looking across multiple asset classes and beyond Size, a global reach, diversity of investment capabilities and commitment to listening to our clients are essential to success. 2015 Trending Conversations (www.leggmason.com/trendingconversations) Key findings from our 2015 Global Investment Survey Bullish optimism and a domestic bias sum up the findings from our 2015 survey of 4,208 investors worldwide. Investors were more bullish going into 2015, with 51% expecting to increase their allocation of assets to equities — up 14% from 2014. Over 80% felt optimistic about their investments, while the majority was also more confident in their ability to manage their investments and to retire at the age they want. Home bias was revealed by the 77% of investors who said their domestic equity markets presented the top investment opportunities for 2015 — an 18% increase over 2014. International investments made up 16% of investors’ portfolios; 63% said global uncertainty was the major barrier preventing global investments. Investors saw the U.S., Hong Kong and Australia as the best opportunities for international investments. 12 Legg Mason AR2015 UNITED STATES UNITED KINGDOM ITALY Top three investor worries for 2015 Global economic instability Economic instability in the U.S. Increasing market volatility Bottom three investor worries for 2015 Inflation Interest rates/yields Deflation How long UK investors expect to stay invested post retirement YEARS19 Italians have highest financial adviser usage in Europe (%) 40 35 29 15 Italy UK Spain Germany GERMANY SINGAPORE CHINA Appetite for income investments growing (%) 2014 2015 Singapore investors say generating income for living expenses is a primary goal (%) 49 69 52 31 Though about a third feel that they are not progressing in achieving this goal (%) Focus on international investments in the next year compared to last year (%) 79 Top markets for international investments (%) U.S.: 63 Hong Kong: 48 The Legg Mason Global Sales Leadership meeting in March 2015 at the Baltimore headquarters brought together colleagues from Legg Mason and its Affiliates spanning six continents to collaborate, review best practices, and set growth priorities. Product Distribution When we look at our business opportunity today, we see a bifurcated world. Rather than join the debate about active vs. passive, we recognize that to serve investors well, it’s about active AND passive. The world’s demographics are changing, which creates opportunities for investment managers who both understand their responsibility to the investors they serve and are willing to embrace innovative ways to reach them. Legg Mason identifies three broad opportunity sets in product development Traditional, classic active Here, Legg Mason has investment strength across fixed income and equities in markets around the world. Next generation active These are flexible, alternative and outcome oriented strategies that are increasingly in demand from investors. In just two years, we have grown the number of products we offer by 27% and are accelerating that effort. The evolution of the ETF vehicle beyond traditional passive This year, we added an ETF team who is evaluating opportunities to extend existing active strategies and add new strategies into ETF wrappers. In fiscal year 2015, Legg Mason’s global retail product team launched 23 products and streamlined 69 existing products to create a more relevant, focused product set. Through the acquisitions of Martin Currie and QS Investors, Legg Mason added significant new investment capabilities and additional opportunities yet to be commercialized into new retail products. Our product development agenda will always be driven by our clients’ needs and preferences. We believe our global distribution organization is a strategic asset that will enable us to do just that. Today we and our intermediary partners are working together in multiple ways to solve the diverse financial needs of a global investor population. We’ve realigned our client facing teams to maximize their time in front of clients and expanded our team globally. We’ve invested in technology and predictive analytics to better understand client needs. Finally, we’re partnering with rogenSi for our Global Sales Academy to connect our sales teams around the globe and create the same high quality consultative sales approach in every region in which we operate. Partnership is the guiding principle of our work with our investment affiliates. Collectively, our seven primary investment Affiliates bring significant capabilities across asset classes and geographies to our clients. We believe that we can best position clients for success when we are working with them to identify investment opportunities early and tailor them across all of the regions we serve. By expanding opportunities throughout the organization, we’re seeing strong momentum everywhere we operate. Legg Mason’s Global Distribution Group recorded record gross and net sales of nearly $83 and $19 billion respectively. Furthermore, the growing diversity of our business is evident is six straight quarters of positive net sales by our Distribution Group, both internationally and in the U.S. 13 Legg Mason AR2015BOARD OF DIRECTORS Standing (left to right) John H. Myers Senior Advisor, Gordon & Co.; Former CEO, GE Asset Management Dennis M. Kass Private Investor; Retired CEO, Jennison Associates Joseph A. Sullivan Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Legg Mason, Inc. John V. Murphy Former CEO, Oppenheimer Funds Inc.; (Lead Independent Director, Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees) Cheryl Gordon Krongard Private Investor; Former CEO, Rothschild Asset Management; (Chair of the Compensation Committee) Barry W. Huff Retired Vice Chairman, Deloitte; (Chairman of the Audit Committee) Seated (left to right) Margaret Milner Richardson Private Consultant and Investor; Former U.S. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Kurt L. Schmoke President of the University of Baltimore; Former Mayor of Baltimore Carol Anthony (“John”) Davidson Private investor; Former Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Tyco International, LTD. Robert E. Angelica Private Investor; Former Chairman and CEO, AT&T Investment Management Corporation; (Chairman of the Risk Committee) W. Allen Reed Private Investor; Retired CEO, GM Asset Management Corporation; (Chairman of the Finance Committee) 14 Legg Mason AR2015 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted) Operating Results Operating Revenues Operating expenses, excluding impairment Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill Operating Income (Loss) Other non-operating expense, net, including $107,074 debt extinguishment loss in July 2014 and $68,975 in May 2012 Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles, net Income (Loss) before Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Income tax provision (benefit) Net Income (Loss) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 $ 2,819,106 2,320,887 – 498,219 (136,114) $ 2,741,757 2,310,864 – 430,893 (13,726) $ 2,612,650 2,313,149 734,000 (434,499) (73,287) $ 2,662,574 2,323,821 – 338,753 (54,006) $ 2,784,317 2,397,509 – 386,808 (23,315) 5,888 2,474 (2,821) 18,336 1,704 367,993 125,284 242,709 5,629 419,641 137,805 281,836 (2,948) (510,607) (150,859) (359,748) (6,421) 303,083 72,052 231,031 10,214 365,197 119,434 245,763 (8,160) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 237,080 $ 284,784 $ (353,327) $ 220,817 $ 253,923 Per Share Net Income (Loss) per Share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders: Basic Diluted Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:(1) Basic Diluted Dividends Declared Balance Sheet Total Assets Long-term debt Total Stockholders' Equity Financial Ratios and Other Data Adjusted Income(2) Adjusted Income per diluted share(2) Operating Margin Operating Margin, as Adjusted(3) Total debt to total capital(4) Assets under management (in millions) Full-time employees $ $ $ 2.06 2.04 112,019 113,246 0.64 $ $ $ 2.34 2.33 121,941 122,383 0.52 $ $ $ (2.65) (2.65) 133,226 133,226 0.44 $ $ $ 1.54 1.54 143,292 143,349 0.32 $ $ $ 1.63 1.63 155,321 155,484 0.20 $ 7,073,977 1,058,089 4,484,901 $ 7,111,349 1,039,264 4,724,724 $ 7,269,660 1,144,954 4,818,351 $ 8,555,747 1,136,892 5,677,291 $ 8,707,756 1,201,868 5,770,384 $ $ $ 378,751 3.26 17.7% 23.0% 19.1% 702,724 2,982 $ $ $ 417,805 3.41 15.7% 22.0% 18.0% 701,774 2,843 $ $ $ 347,169 2.61 (16.6)% 17.5% 19.2% 664,609 2,975 $ $ $ 397,030 2.77 12.7% 22.3% 19.6% 643,318 2,979 $ $ $ 439,248 2.83 13.9% 24.3% 20.1% 677,646 3,395 (1) Excludes weighted-average unvested restricted shares deemed to be participating securities for the year ended March 31, 2015. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) Adjusted Income is a non-GAAP performance measure. We define Adjusted Income as Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., plus amortization and deferred taxes related to intangible assets and goodwill, and imputed interest and tax benefits on contingent convertible debt less deferred income taxes on goodwill and indefinite-life intangible asset impairment, if any. We also adjust for certain non-core items, such as intangible asset impairments, the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, the impact of tax rate adjustments on certain deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-life intangible assets, and loss on extinguishment of contingent convertible debt. The calculation of Adjusted Income per diluted share includes weighted-average unvested restricted shares. See Supplemental Non-GAAP Information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (3) Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is a non-GAAP performance measure we calculate by dividing (i) Operating Income (Loss), adjusted to exclude the impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on investments made to fund deferred compensation plans, the impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on seed capital investments by our affiliates under revenue sharing agreements, amortization related to intangible assets, transition-related costs of streamlining our business model, if any, income (loss) of consolidated investment vehicles, the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, and impairment charges by (ii) our Operating Revenues, adjusted to add back net investment advisory fees eliminated upon consolidation of investment vehicles, less distribution and servicing expenses which we use as an approximate measure of revenues that are passed through to third parties, which we refer to as “Operating Revenues, as Adjusted.” See Supplemental Non-GAAP Information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (4) Calculated based on total debt as a percentage of total capital (total stockholders’ equity plus total debt) as of March 31. 15 Legg Mason AR2015MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Executive Overview Legg Mason, Inc., a holding company, with its subsidiaries (which collectively comprise “Legg Mason”) is a global asset management firm. Acting through our subsidiaries, we provide investment management and related services to institutional and individual clients, company-sponsored mutual funds and other investment vehicles. We offer these products and services directly and through various financial intermediaries. We have operations principally in the U.S. and the U.K. and also have offices in Australia, Bahamas, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Dubai, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Poland, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland and Taiwan. All references to fiscal 2015, 2014 or 2013, refer to our fiscal year ended March 31 of that year. Terms such as “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Legg Mason. Our operating revenues primarily consist of investment advisory fees from separate accounts and funds, and distribution and service fees. Investment advisory fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the assets of the investment portfolios that we manage. In addition, performance fees may be earned under certain investment advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks or hurdle rates. The largest portion of our performance fees is earned based on 12-month performance periods that end in differing quarters during the year, with a portion based on quarterly performance periods. Distribution and service fees are received for distributing investment products and services, for providing other support services to investment portfolios, or for providing non-discretionary advisory services, and are generally calculated as a percentage of the assets in an investment portfolio or as a percentage of new assets added to an investment portfolio. Our revenues, therefore, are dependent upon the level of our assets under management (“AUM”) and assets under advisement (“AUA”) and fee rates, and thus are affected by factors such as securities market conditions, our ability to attract and maintain AUM and key investment personnel, and investment performance. Our AUM primarily vary from period to period due to inflows and outflows of client assets as well as market performance. Client decisions to increase or decrease their assets under our management, and decisions by potential clients to utilize our services, may be based on one or more of a number of factors. These factors include our reputation in the marketplace, the investment performance (both absolute and relative to benchmarks or competitive products) of our products and services, the fees we charge for our investment services, the client or potential client’s situation, including investment objectives, liquidity needs, investment horizon and amount of assets managed, our relationships with distributors and the external economic environment, including market conditions. The fees that we charge for our investment services vary based upon factors such as the type of underlying investment product, the amount of AUM, the asset management affiliate that provides the services, and the type of services (and investment objectives) that are provided. Fees charged for equity asset management services are generally higher than fees charged for fixed income or liquidity asset management services. Accordingly, our revenues and average advisory revenue yields will be affected by the composition of our AUM, with changes in the relative level of equity assets and alternatives typically more significantly impacting our revenues and average advisory revenue yields. Average advisory revenue yields are calculated as the ratio of annualized investment advisory fees, excluding performance fees, to average AUM. In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we may reduce or waive investment management fees, or limit total expenses, on certain products or services for particular time periods to manage fund expenses, or for other reasons, and to help retain or increase managed assets. We have revenue sharing agreements in place for most of our asset management affiliates, under which specified percentages of the affiliates’ revenues are required to be distributed to us and the balance of the revenues is retained by the affiliates to pay their operating expenses, including compensation expenses, but excluding certain expenses and income taxes. Under these agreements, our asset management affiliates retain different percentages of revenues to cover their costs. As such, our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., operating margin and compensation as a percentage of operating revenues are impacted based on which affiliates and products generate our AUM, and a change in AUM at one affiliate or with respect to one product or class of products can have a dramatically different effect on our revenues and earnings than an equal change at another affiliate or in another product or class of products. In addition, from time to time, we may agree to changes in revenue sharing agreements and other arrangements with our asset management personnel, which may impact our compensation expenses and profitability. 16 Legg Mason AR2015The most significant component of our cost structure is employee compensation and benefits, of which a majority is variable in nature and includes incentive compensation that is primarily based upon revenue levels, non-compensation related operating expense levels at revenue share-based affiliates, and our overall profitability. The next largest component of our cost structure is distribution and servicing expense, which consists primarily of fees paid to third-party distributors for selling our asset management products and services and are largely variable in nature. Certain other operating costs are typically consistent from period to period, such as occupancy, depreciation and amortization, and fixed contract commitments for market data, communication and technology services, and usually do not decline with reduced levels of business activity or, conversely, usually do not rise proportionately with increased business activity. Our financial position and results of operations are materially affected by the overall trends and conditions of the financial markets, particularly in the U.S., but increasingly in the other countries in which we operate. Results of any individual period should not be considered representative of future results. Our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the amount and composition of our AUM, and the volatility and general level of securities prices and interest rates, among other things. Periods of unfavorable market conditions are likely to have an adverse effect on our profitability. In addition, the diversification of services and products offered, investment performance, access to distribution channels, reputation in the market, attracting and retaining key employees and client relations are significant factors in determining whether we are successful in attracting and retaining clients. In the last few years, the industry has seen flows into products for which we do not currently garner significant market share. The financial services business in which we are engaged is extremely competitive. Our competition includes numerous global, national, regional and local asset management firms, commercial banks, insurance companies and other financial services companies. The industry has been impacted by continued economic uncertainty, the constant introduction of new products and services, and the consolidation of financial services firms through mergers and acquisitions. The industry in which we operate is also subject to extensive regulation under federal, state, and foreign laws. Like most firms, we have been impacted by regulatory and legislative changes. Responding to these changes and keeping abreast of regulatory developments, has required, and will continue to require, us to incur costs that continue to impact our profitability. Our strategic priorities are focused on four primary areas listed below. Management keeps these strategic priorities in mind when it evaluates our operating performance and financial condition. Consistent with this approach, we have also presented in the table below the most important initiatives on which management currently focuses in evaluating our performance and financial condition. Strategic Priorities Initiatives Products • Create an innovative portfolio of investment products and promote revenue growth through new product development and leveraging the capabilities of our affiliates • Identify and execute strategic acquisitions to increase product offerings and fill gaps in products and services • Deliver compelling and consistent performance against both relevant benchmarks and the products and services of our competitors Performance Distribution • Evaluate and reallocate resources within and to our distribution platform to continue to maintain and enhance our leading distribution function with the capability to offer solutions to relevant investment challenges and grow market share worldwide Productivity • Operate with a high level of effectiveness and improve ongoing efficiency • Manage expenses • Align affiliate economic relationships The strategic priorities discussed above are designed to drive improvements in our net flows, earnings, cash flows, AUM and other key metrics, including operating margin. Certain of these key metrics are discussed in our annual results discussion to follow. In connection with these strategic priorities, on October 1, 2014, we acquired Martin Currie (Holdings) Limited (“Martin Currie”). Martin Currie is a leading global equities specialist based in the United Kingdom with approximately $9.5 billion of AUM as of the date of acquisition. In connection with this acquisition, as of January 1, 2015, our legacy Australian asset manager became part of Martin Currie and was renamed Martin Currie Australia (“MC Australia”). 17 Legg Mason AR2015Strong overall investment performance and improved sales from our global distribution function contributed to net client inflows in long-term AUM in the year ended March 31, 2015, while total net client flows were negative as a result of outflows in liquidity AUM. Increases in AUM due to the Martin Currie and QS Investors acquisitions, net client inflows in long-term AUM, and positive market performance, were offset in part by the reclassification of certain client assets previously reported as AUM to AUA, as further discussed below, net client outflows in liquidity AUM, and the impact of the sale of LMIC. The following discussion and analysis provides additional information regarding our financial condition and results of operations. Business Environment and Results of Operations During fiscal 2015, the economic environment was characterized by continued domestic growth with improved economic data in the U.S., with overall markets remaining sensitive to increasing concern over economic conditions in other countries. All three major U.S. equity market indices increased during the past three fiscal years, while bond indices were mixed, as illustrated in the table below: % Change for the Year Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 Indices(1) Dow Jones Industrial Average 8.0% 12.9% 10.3% S&P 500 10.4% 19.3% 11.4% NASDAQ Composite Index 16.7% 28.5% 5.7% (0.1)% 5.7% 3.8% Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index (3.7)% 1.9% 1.3% (1) Indices are trademarks of Dow Jones & Company, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc., and Barclays Capital, respectively, which are not affiliated with Legg Mason. Also in connection with these strategic priorities, effective May 31, 2014, we acquired QS Investors Holdings, LLC (“QS Investors”). During the year ended March 31, 2015, we incurred approximately $35.8 million in expenses related to the integration over time of two of our existing affiliates, Batterymarch Financial Management, Inc. (“Batterymarch”) and Legg Mason Global Asset Allocation, LLC (“LMGAA”) into QS Investors. Additional costs related to the integration are not expected to be material. In addition, on November 7, 2014, we completed the sale of all of our equity interests in Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company N.A. (“LMIC”), to Stifel Financial Corporation’s Global Wealth Management business, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. See Notes 2 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding acquisitions and dispositions. During the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we also incurred $1.6 million and $29.4 million, respectively, in expenses related to various corporate initiatives implemented in fiscal 2014, including closing down and reorganizing certain businesses, and ongoing efforts to increase efficiency and effectiveness. Savings realized as a result of these corporate initiatives are being reinvested into our centralized global distribution business. As a result of reinvesting these savings and other additional investments, we incurred expenses of approximately $11 million in the year ended March 31, 2015 and expect these expenses to continue at an annual rate of approximately $28 million to $32 million going forward. Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2015 was $237.1 million, or $2.04 per diluted share, as compared to $284.8 million, or $2.33 per diluted share for the year ended March 31, 2014. Average AUM and total revenues increased in fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, as further discussed below. 18 Legg Mason AR2015The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) as a percentage of operating revenues and the increase (decrease) by item as a percentage of the amount for the previous period: Percentage of Operating Revenues Period to Period Change (1) Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 Operating Revenues Investment advisory fees Separate accounts Funds Performance fees Distribution and service fees Other Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Compensation and benefits Distribution and servicing Communications and technology Occupancy Amortization of intangible assets Impairment of intangible assets Other Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Interest income Interest expense Other income (expense), net Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles, net Total other non-operating expense Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Income tax provision (benefit) Net Income (Loss) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 29.2% 28.4% 28.0% 54.8 3.0 12.8 0.2 54.7 3.9 12.7 0.3 55.3 3.8 12.6 0.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 43.7 21.1 6.5 3.9 0.1 – 7.0 82.3 17.7 0.3 (2.1) (3.0) 0.2 (4.6) 13.1 4.5 8.6 0.2 44.1 22.6 5.8 4.2 0.4 – 7.2 84.3 15.7 0.2 (1.9) 1.2 0.1 (0.4) 15.3 5.0 10.3 (0.1) 45.5 23.0 5.7 6.6 0.5 28.1 7.2 116.6 (16.6) 0.3 (2.4) (0.7) (0.1) (2.9) (19.5) (5.7) (13.8) (0.3) 6.0% 2.9 (22.0) 3.9 (32.1) 2.8 1.9 (3.9) 15.5 (4.8) (78.9) n/m 1.3 0.4 15.6 17.2 10.2 n/m n/m n/m (12.3) (9.1) (13.9) n/m Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 8.4% 10.4% (13.5)% (16.8)% n/m — not meaningful (1) Calculated based on the change in actual amounts between fiscal years as a percentage of the prior year amount. 6.4% 3.8 8.6 5.2 16.7 4.9 1.8 3.1 5.5 (33.0) (12.1) n/m 4.0 (24.2) n/m (15.8) (15.9) n/m n/m (85.2) n/m n/m n/m (54.1) n/m 19 Legg Mason AR2015Assets Under Management and Assets Under Advisement Assets Under Management Our AUM is primarily managed across the following asset classes: Equity • Large Cap Growth • Small Cap Core • Large Cap Value • Equity Income • International Equity • Sector Equity • Mid Cap Core • Emerging Markets Equity • Global Equity • Large Cap Core Fixed Income • U.S. Intermediate Investment Grade • U.S. Credit Aggregate • Global Opportunistic Fixed Income • Global Government • U.S. Municipal • Global Fixed Income • U.S. Long Duration • U.S. Limited Duration • U.S. High Yield • Emerging Markets Liquidity • U.S. Managed Cash • U.S. Municipal Cash The components of the changes in our AUM (in billions) for the years ended March 31, were as follows: Beginning of period Net client cash flows Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds(1) Subscriptions Redemptions Separate account flows, net Total long-term flows Liquidity fund flows, net Separate account flows, net Total liquidity flows Total net client cash flows Market performance and other(2) Acquisitions (dispositions), net(3) End of period 2015 2014 2013 $ 701.8 $ 664.6 $ 643.3 72.1 (61.2) 5.6 16.5 (21.3) (0.9) (22.2) (5.7) 1.6 5.0 52.1 (58.1) 2.2 (3.8) 11.8 0.3 12.1 8.3 30.2 (1.3) 44.9 (49.0) (27.3) (31.4) 19.8 (0.1) 19.7 (11.7) 34.2 (1.2) $ 702.7 $ 701.8 $ 664.6 (1) Subscriptions and redemptions reflect the gross activity in the funds and include assets transferred between funds and between share classes. (2) Includes the positive impact of market performance and other, including the reinvestment of dividends and other, of $32.9 billion, $35.1 billion, and $42.5 billion, for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, and the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements of $18.5 billion, $4.9 billion, and $8.3 billion, primarily related to fixed income securities, for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Fiscal 2015 also includes the reclassification of $12.8 billion of client assets from AUM to AUA in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. (3) The year ended March 31, 2015 includes $9.5 billion related to the acquisition of Martin Currie and $5.0 billion related to the acquisition of QS Investors, offset in part by $9.5 billion related to the disposition of LMIC. AUM at March 31, 2015 was $702.7 billion, an increase of $0.9 billion, or 0.1%, from March 31, 2014. Total net client outflows were $5.7 billion, as net client outflows of $22.2 billion from the liquidity asset class were substantially offset by $16.5 billion of net client inflows into long-term asset classes. In fiscal 2015, we experienced net inflows into long-term asset classes for the first time since fiscal 2007. Net long-term asset inflows were comprised of fixed income inflows of $19.2 billion offset in part by equity outflows of $2.7 billion. Fixed income inflows were primarily in products managed by Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC (“Brandywine”) and Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”). Equity net outflows were primarily in products managed at Royce & Associates (“Royce”), for which outflows are expected to continue for the near-term, and QS Investors, including 20 Legg Mason AR2015legacy Batterymarch, and were partially offset by equity inflows at ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”) and Brandywine. We generally earn higher fees and profits on equity AUM, and outflows in the equity asset class will more negatively impact our revenues and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. than would outflows in other asset classes. Market performance and other totaled $1.6 billion, as the positive impact of market performance and other of $32.9 billion was substantially offset by the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations of $18.5 billion and the reclassification of $12.8 billion of client assets from AUM to AUA in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, as further discussed below. Acquisitions (dispositions), net, totaled $5.0 billion, with $9.5 billion related to the acquisition of Martin Currie and $5.0 billion related to the acquisition of QS Investors, offset in part by $9.5 billion related to the disposition of LMIC. AUM at March 31, 2014 was $701.8 billion, an increase of $37.2 billion, or 6%, from March 31, 2013. Total net client inflows were $8.3 billion, as $12.1 billion of net client inflows into the liquidity asset class were offset in part by $3.8 billion of net client outflows from long-term asset classes. Net long-term asset outflows were comprised of equity outflows of $5.0 billion, offset in part by fixed income inflows of $1.2 billion. Equity outflows occurred in products managed at Royce, legacy Batterymarch, The Permal Group, Ltd. (“Permal”), and Legg Mason Capital Management (renamed ClearBridge, LLC), and were partially offset by equity inflows at ClearBridge. Fixed income inflows were primarily in products managed by Brandywine, and were partially offset by outflows principally at Western Asset, including $4.8 billion in outflows from a single, low-fee global sovereign mandate. Market performance and other totaled $30.2 billion, as the positive impact of market performance and other of $35.1 billion was offset in part by the negative impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations of $4.9 billion. Dispositions of $1.3 billion resulted from the sale of a small affiliate. Our investment advisory and administrative contracts are generally terminable at will or upon relatively short notice, and investors in the mutual funds that we manage may redeem their investments in the funds at any time without prior notice. Institutional and individual clients can terminate their relationships with us, reduce the aggregate amount of assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in our repu- tation in the marketplace, changes in management or control of clients or third-party distributors with whom we have relationships, loss of key investment management personnel or financial market performance. AUM by Asset Class AUM by asset class (in billions) for the years ended March 31 were as follows: Equity Fixed Income Liquidity Total 2015 % of Total 2014 % of Total 2013 % of Total $ 199.4 28% $ 186.4 27% $ 161.8 376.1 127.2 54 18 365.2 150.2 52 21 365.1 137.7 24% 55 21 $ 702.7 100% $ 701.8 100% $ 664.6 100% Average AUM by asset class (in billions) for the years ended March 31 were as follows: Equity Fixed Income Liquidity Total 2015 % of Total 2014 % of Total 2013 % of Total $ 195.4 28% $ 172.8 26% $ 152.1 367.1 140.0 52 20 358.7 135.9 54 20 364.5 128.9 24% 56 20 $ 702.5 100% $ 667.4 100% $ 645.5 100% % Change 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 7% 3 (15) –% 15% – 9 6% % Change 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 13% 2 3 5% 14% (2) 5 3% 21 Legg Mason AR2015The component changes in our AUM by asset class (in billions) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were as follows: March 31, 2012 $ 163.4 $ 356.1 $ 123.8 $ 643.3 Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds Equity Fixed Income Liquidity Total Subscriptions Redemptions(1) Separate account flows, net Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other (2) Acquisitions (dispositions), net March 31, 2013 Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds Subscriptions Redemptions(1) Separate account flows, net Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other (2) Acquisitions (dispositions), net March 31, 2014 Investment funds, excluding liquidity funds Subscriptions Redemptions Separate account flows, net Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other(2) Acquisitions (dispositions), net (3) March 31, 2015 18.9 (26.4) (12.9) – (20.4) 13.4 5.4 161.8 27.0 (30.1) (1.9) – (5.0) 30.9 (1.3) 26.0 (22.6) (14.4) – (11.0) 20.0 – 365.1 25.1 (28.0) 4.1 – 1.2 (1.1) – – – (0.1) 19.8 19.7 0.8 (6.6) 137.7 – – 0.3 11.8 12.1 0.4 – 186.4 365.2 150.2 29.4 (33.7) 1.6 – (2.7) 8.7 7.0 42.7 (27.5) 4.0 – 19.2 (6.3) (2.0) – – (0.9) (21.3) (22.2) (0.8) – 44.9 (49.0) (27.4) 19.8 (11.7) 34.2 (1.2) 664.6 52.1 (58.1) 2.5 11.8 8.3 30.2 (1.3) 701.8 72.1 (61.2) 4.7 (21.3) (5.7) 1.6 5.0 $ 199.4 $ 376.1 $ 127.2 $ 702.7 (1) Fixed income redemptions include $4.7 billion and $6.4 billion for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to a single, low-fee global sovereign mandate client. Assets related to this client were reclassified from AUM to AUA during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, as further discussed below. (2) Total market performance and other includes the positive impact of market performance and other, including the reinvestment of dividends and other, of $32.9 billion, $35.1 billion, and $42.5 billion, for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, and the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements of $18.5 billion, $4.9 billion, and $8.3 billion, for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to fixed income securities. The year ended March 31, 2015, also includes the reclassification of $12.8 billion of client assets from AUM to AUA during the first quarter of fiscal 2015. (3) Total acquisitions (dispositions), net, for the year ended March 31, 2015, includes $9.5 billion and $5.0 billion related to the acquisitions of Martin Currie and QS Investors, respectively, offset in part by $9.5 billion related to the disposition of LMIC. 22 Legg Mason AR2015AUM by Distribution Channel Broadly, we have two principal distribution channels, Global Distribution and Affiliate/Other, through which we sell a variety of investment products and services. Global Distribution, which consists of our centralized global distribution operations, principally sells U.S. and international mutual funds and other commingled vehicles, retail separately managed account programs, and sub- advisory accounts for insurance companies and similar clients. Affiliate/Other consists of the distribution operations within our asset managers which principally sell institutional separate account management, liquidity (money market) funds, and funds-of-hedge funds. The component changes in our AUM by distribution channel (in billions) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were as follows: March 31, 2012 Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other Acquisitions (dispositions), net March 31, 2013 Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other Acquisitions (dispositions), net March 31, 2014 Net client cash flows, excluding liquidity funds Liquidity fund flows, net Net client cash flows Market performance and other Acquisitions (dispositions), net March 31, 2015 Global Distribution Affiliate/ Other Total $ 220.6 $ 422.7 $ 643.3 2.2 – 2.2 9.3 – 232.1 (1.2) – (1.2) 16.5 – 247.4 16.4 – 16.4 6.2 – (33.7) 19.8 (13.9) 24.9 (1.2) 432.5 (2.3) 11.8 9.5 13.7 (1.3) 454.4 (0.8) (21.3) (22.1) (4.6) 5.0(1) (31.5) 19.8 (11.7) 34.2 (1.2) 664.6 (3.5) 11.8 8.3 30.2 (1.3) 701.8 15.6 (21.3) (5.7) 1.6 5.0 $ 270.0 $ 432.7 $ 702.7 (1) Includes $9.5 billion related to the acquisition of Martin Currie, $5.0 billion related to the acquisition of QS Investors, offset in part by $9.5 billion related to the disposition of LMIC. Effective Fee Rates Our overall effective fee rate across all asset classes and distribution channels was approximately 34 basis points for each of the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Fees for managing equity assets are generally higher, averaging approximately 65 basis points for the year ended March 31, 2015, 70 basis points for the year ended March 31, 2014, and 75 basis points for the year ended March 31, 2013. The average fees rate for managing equity assets has declined over the last three years due to a shift in the mix of equity assets from higher fee equity products to lower fee equity products. This compares to fees for managing fixed income assets, which averaged approximately 30 basis points for the year ended March 31, 2015, and 25 basis points for each of the years ended March 31, 2014, and 2013, and liquidity assets, which averaged under 10 basis points (reflecting the impact of current advisory fee waivers due to the low interest rate environment) for each of the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013. Equity assets are primarily managed by ClearBridge, Royce, Brandywine, Permal, QS Investors (including legacy Batterymarch assets), and Martin Currie; fixed income assets are primarily managed by Western Asset, Brandywine, and Permal; and liquidity assets are managed by Western Asset. Fee rates for assets distributed through Legg Mason Global Distribution, which 23 Legg Mason AR2015are predominately retail in nature, averaged approximately 50 basis points for each of the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, while fee rates for assets distributed through the Affiliate/Other channel averaged approximately 30 basis points for each of the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Investment Performance Overall investment performance of our AUM for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, was generally positive compared to relevant benchmarks. Year ended March 31, 2015 For the year ended March 31, 2015, most U.S. indices produced positive returns. The best performing was the NASDAQ Composite, returning 16.7%. These returns were achieved in an economic environment characterized by uneven global growth and heightened sensitivity to economic news such as declining oil prices and unrest in the Middle East. In the fixed income markets, the Federal Reserve kept the target rate and discount rate steady while signaling an increase in the Federal Reserve funds target rate in the near term. Overall, the yield curve flattened over the year as many long-dated yields declined. The lowest performing fixed income sector for the year was high yield bonds, as measured by the Barclays U.S. High Yield Index, which returned 2.0%. The best performing fixed income sector for the year was corporate bonds as measured by the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, which returned 6.7%. Year ended March 31, 2014 For the year ended March 31, 2014, most U.S. indices produced positive returns. The best performing was the NASDAQ Composite, returning 28.5%. These returns were achieved in an economic environment characterized by uneven global growth and heightened sensitivity to economic news, such as concerns for economic growth in China and the ongoing Ukraine/Russia crisis. In the fixed income markets, the Federal Reserve kept the target rate and discount rate steady while tapering the bond-buying program. The yield curve steepened over the year but flattened in the last quarter as many long-dated yields declined. The lowest performing fixed income sector for the year was U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”), as measured by the Barclays U.S. TIPS Index which declined 6.5%. The best performing fixed income sector for the year was high yield bonds as measured by the Barclays U.S. High Yield Bond Index, which returned 7.5% as of March 31, 2014. Year ended March 31, 2013 For the year ended March 31, 2013, most U.S. indices produced positive returns. The best performing was the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index, which returned 17.8%. These returns were achieved in an economic environment characterized by uneven domestic growth and heightened sensitivity to economic news which included improving unemployment and housing figures, the anticipation and implementation of the sequestration, concerns surrounding the fiscal cliff, and periodic developments in the continuing European sovereign debt crisis. In the fixed income markets, the Federal Reserve affirmed its commitment to hold the federal funds rate at historic lows, by beginning a third round of quantitative easing and continuing support of the secondary mortgage market. These actions were taken to keep interest rates low and stimulate economic growth, and resulted in a downward shift in the yield curve over the year. The lowest performing fixed income sector for the year was U.S. government bonds, as measured by the Barclays U.S. Government Bond Index, which returned 3.0%. The best performing fixed income sector for the year was high yield bonds as measured by the Barclays U.S. High Yield Bond Index, which returned 13.1%. 24 Legg Mason AR2015The following table presents a summary of the percentages of our AUM by strategy (1) that outpaced their respective benchmarks as of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, for the trailing 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods: As of March 31, 2015 (%) As of March 31, 2014 (%) As of March 31, 2013 (%) 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year Total (includes liquidity) Equity: Large cap Small cap Total equity (includes other equity) Fixed Income: U.S. taxable U.S. tax-exempt Global taxable Total fixed income 67 24 10 30 74 100 77 76 84 64 11 58 94 100 89 93 86 74 26 66 93 100 88 92 88 94 42 81 88 100 84 88 75 87 84 92 84 85 88 67 33 54 94 0 54 74 91 26 69 94 100 82 91 52 29 45 94 100 98 96 76 82 77 97 100 93 96 65 13 48 96 100 89 94 68 15 50 94 100 94 94 88 27 62 91 100 95 93 91 80 62 71 90 100 98 94 The following table presents a summary of the percentages of our U.S. mutual fund assets (2) that outpaced their Lipper category averages as of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, for the trailing 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods: As of March 31, 2015 (%) As of March 31, 2014 (%) As of March 31, 2013 (%) 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year Total (excludes liquidity) Equity: Large cap Small cap Total equity (includes other equity) Fixed Income: U.S. taxable U.S. tax-exempt Global taxable Total fixed income 55 46 15 38 80 83 79 80 65 82 19 57 87 57 86 78 63 73 21 53 86 60 81 77 70 69 59 63 86 88 55 84 44 63 56 68 59 57 70 49 27 39 80 27 27 54 86 19 55 85 61 86 78 55 25 42 92 68 84 83 54 72 60 85 86 86 86 90 27 56 74 50 71 64 79 16 44 92 57 74 76 77 48 59 85 86 95 87 64 40 68 53 90 84 54 85 (1) For purposes of investment performance comparisons, strategies are an aggregation of discretionary portfolios (separate accounts, investment funds, and other products) into a single group that represents a particular investment objective. In the case of separate accounts, the investment performance of the account is based upon the performance of the strategy to which the account has been assigned. Each of our asset managers has its own specific guidelines for including portfolios in their strategies. For those managers which manage both separate accounts and investment funds in the same strategy, the performance comparison for all of the assets is based upon the performance of the separate account. As of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 90%, 91% and 90% of total AUM is included in strategy AUM, respectively, although not all strategies have three-, five-, and ten-year histories. Total strategy AUM includes liquidity assets. Certain assets are not included in reported performance comparisons. These include: accounts that are not managed in accordance with the guidelines outlined above; accounts in strategies not marketed to potential clients; accounts that have not yet been assigned to a strategy; and certain smaller products at some of our affiliates. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For AUM included in institutional and retail separate accounts and investment funds included in the same strategy as separate accounts, performance comparisons are based on gross-of-fee performance. For investment funds (including fund-of-hedge funds) which are not managed in a separate account format, performance comparisons are based on net-of-fee performance. These performance comparisons do not reflect the actual performance of any specific separate account or investment fund; individual separate account and investment fund performance may differ. (2) Source: Lipper Inc. includes open-end, closed-end, and variable annuity funds. As of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the U.S. long-term mutual fund assets represented in the data accounted for 21%, 20% and 19%, respectively, of our total AUM. The performance of our U.S. long-term mutual fund assets is included in the strategies. 25 Legg Mason AR2015The following table presents a summary of the absolute and relative performance compared to the applicable benchmark for a representative sample of funds within our AUM, net of management and other fees as of the end of the period presented, for the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, and from each fund’s inception. The table includes a representative sample of funds from each significant subclass of our investment strategies (i.e., large cap equity, small cap equity, etc.). The funds within this group are representative of the performance of significant investment strategies we offer, that as of March 31, 2015, constituted an aggregate of approximately $436.1 billion, or approximately 62% of our total AUM. The only meaningful exclusion of funds are our funds-of-hedge funds strategies, which involve privately placed hedge funds, and represent only 3% of our total AUM as of March 31, 2015, for which investment performance is not made publicly available. Providing investment returns of funds provides a relevant representation of our performance while avoiding the many complexities relating to factors such as multiple fee structures, bundled pricing, and asset level break points, that would arise in reporting performance for strategies or other product aggregations. Fund Name/Index (1) Equity Annualized Absolute (%) / Relative Total Return vs. Benchmark (%) Inception Date Performance Type (2) 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year Inception 10/24/1983 Absolute Relative 11/6/1992 Absolute Relative 3/10/1970 Absolute Relative 4/16/1982 Absolute Relative 11/12/1981 Absolute Relative 8/29/1997 Absolute Relative 12/31/1988 Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Large Cap ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund Russell 3000 Growth ClearBridge Equity Income Russell 3000 Value ClearBridge Appreciation Fund S&P 500 ClearBridge Value Trust S&P 500 ClearBridge All Cap Value Russell 3000 Value ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Russell 1000 Growth ClearBridge Large Cap Value Fund Russell 1000 Value Legg Mason Brandywine Diversified Large Cap Value Fund 9/7/2010 Russell 1000 Value Small Cap Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Russell 2000 Royce Premier Fund Russell 2000 Royce Total Return Fund Russell 2000 ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Russell 2000 Growth Royce Special Equity Russell 2000 7/1/1998 6/30/1967 Absolute Relative 12/31/1991 Absolute Relative 12/15/1993 Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative 5/1/1998 11.38 (4.38) 9.61 0.67 10.57 (2.16) 9.09 (3.64) 6.58 (2.35) 15.82 (0.27) 9.28 (0.05) 8.61 (0.72) 0.11 (8.11) (0.01) (8.22) 2.57 (5.64) 4.83 (7.23) 4.32 (3.89) 20.93 4.48 13.63 (2.67) 14.55 (1.56) 16.15 0.04 13.41 (2.89) 18.85 2.51 15.54 (0.89) 14.76 (1.68) 11.57 (4.70) 9.06 (7.21) 12.90 (3.37) 15.11 (2.63) 11.68 (4.59) 18.65 2.94 13.26 (0.40) 12.83 (1.63) 11.68 (2.79) 10.40 (3.26) 14.67 (0.97) 13.64 (0.12) n/a n/a 11.64 (2.93) 11.23 (3.34) 12.12 (2.45) 16.58 0.00 11.45 (3.11) 9.61 0.19 7.21 (0.03) 7.90 (0.11) 2.49 (5.52) 6.02 (1.22) 8.59 (0.77) 7.73 0.52 n/a n/a 8.17 (0.64) 9.85 1.03 7.80 (1.02) 10.16 0.14 8.74 (0.08) 12.62 2.47 8.70 (1.50) 10.44 (0.10) 12.06 0.08 10.33 (1.75) 8.12 2.01 9.69 (0.83) 16.44 0.49 11.93 n/a 12.03 2.08 11.16 1.99 10.84 3.97 9.77 2.18 26 Legg Mason AR2015Fund Name/Index (1) Fixed Income U.S. Taxable Western Asset Core Plus Fund Barclays US Aggregate Western Asset Core Bond Fund Barclays US Aggregate Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Barclays US Aggregate Western Asset Short Term Bond Fund Citi Treasury Gov't/Credit 1-3 YR Western Asset Intermediate Bond Fund Barclays Intermediate Gov't/Credit Western Asset Inflation Index Plus Bond Barclays US TIPS Western Asset High Yield Fund Barclays US Corp High Yield Western Asset Mortgage Defined Opportunity Fund Inc. BOFAML Floating Rate Home Loan Index Western Asset Corporate Bond Fund Barclays US Credit Western Asset Adjustable Rate Income Citi T-Bill 6-Month U.S. Tax-Exempt Annualized Absolute (%) / Relative Total Return vs. Benchmark (%) Inception Date Performance Type (2) 1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year Inception 7/1/1994 7/8/1998 9/4/1990 7/6/2006 Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative 11/11/1991 Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative 9/28/2001 Absolute Relative 2/24/2010 Absolute Relative 11/6/1992 Absolute Relative 6/22/1992 Absolute Relative 3/1/2001 7.07 1.35 6.85 1.13 1.74 (3.98) 0.96 (0.11) 4.24 0.65 2.45 (0.65) (0.69) (2.69) 14.07 11.69 7.47 0.72 0.81 0.75 4.94 1.84 4.26 1.15 3.10 (0.01) 1.32 0.36 3.26 0.95 0.46 (0.17) 6.73 (0.73) 19.58 12.36 6.70 1.82 1.87 1.77 6.20 1.79 5.84 1.43 3.82 (0.60) 2.25 0.92 4.56 1.04 3.85 (0.44) 7.90 (0.69) 17.61 11.35 7.20 0.97 2.48 2.36 6.11 1.18 5.47 0.55 n/a n/a 2.06 (0.89) 5.05 0.71 4.33 (0.23) 7.09 (1.09) n/a n/a 5.10 (0.70) 1.74 0.19 6.58 1.15 7.24 0.70 4.99 (0.29) 3.74 (0.68) 6.08 0.61 5.58 (0.20) 7.75 (1.32) 17.66 11.42 6.79 0.07 2.85 (0.09) Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Barclays Municipal Bond 3/4/1981 Absolute Relative 7.93 1.31 4.52 0.47 5.54 0.43 5.44 0.59 7.98 0.53 Global Taxable 11/1/2006 Absolute Relative 10/31/2003 Absolute Relative 8/31/2002 Absolute Relative Legg Mason Brandywine Global Opportunities Bond Citi World Gov't Bond Legg Mason Brandywine Global Fixed Income Citi World Gov't Bond Legg Mason Western Asset Global Multi Strategy Fund 50% Barclays Global Aggregate/ 25% Barclays High Yield 2%/25% JP Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index 2/22/1995 Absolute Western Asset Global High Yield Bond Fund Relative Barclays Global High Yield 10/17/1996 Absolute Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Relative JPM EMBI Global 6/30/1983 Absolute Legg Mason Western Asset Australian Bond Trust UBS Australian Composite Bond Index Relative Legg Mason Western Asset Global Core Plus Bond Fund 12/31/2010 Absolute Relative Barclays Global Aggregate Index Liquidity 1.37 6.87 (0.81) 4.69 2.73 2.97 (3.17) (0.92) (0.49) (4.57) 10.94 (0.18) 10.26 2.88 3.68 5.32 1.21 2.85 2.53 (0.22) 5.35 (1.03) 1.23 (3.15) 8.11 0.99 6.83 2.27 6.49 5.07 3.92 2.50 3.65 (1.32) 6.58 (1.35) 4.64 (2.19) 8.45 0.82 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.23 1.15 4.83 (1.12) 6.10 (2.12) 7.23 (0.82) 7.25 0.54 n/a n/a 6.52 3.22 4.89 1.03 6.87 (0.63) 7.36 (1.92) 9.81 0.52 6.68 0.59 6.12 1.34 Western Asset Institutional Liquid Reserves Ltd. Citi 3-Month T-Bill 12/31/1989 Absolute Relative 0.07 0.05 0.11 0.06 0.15 0.08 1.73 0.32 3.42 0.30 (1) Listed in order of size based on AUM of fund within each subcategory. (2) Absolute performance is the actual performance (i.e., rate of return) of the fund. Relative performance is the difference (or variance) between the performance of the fund and its stated benchmark. 27 Legg Mason AR2015Assets Under Advisement During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we began reporting AUA as a result of the acquisition of approximately $98 billion of AUA from QS Investors. Also during the first quarter of fiscal 2015, approximately $12.8 billion of assets previously reported as AUM, primarily related to a low-fee global sovereign mandate for which investment discretion had abated over time, were reclassified to AUA. We experienced significant AUA outflows during the year ended March 31, 2015 as a result of one client redeeming approximately $80 billion. These redemptions did not have a material impact on our net income due to their low fee nature. As of March 31, 2015, AUA was approximately $35 billion, primarily comprised of approximately $17 billion related to QS Investors, approximately $11 billion related to Western Asset and approximately $7 billion related to ClearBridge. AUA fee rates vary with the level of non-discretionary service provided, and, as of March 31, 2015, our average annualized fee rate related to AUA was in the low single digit basis points. Fees for AUA, aggregating $30 million, are considered servicing fees and are therefore recorded in Distribution and service fees in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended March 31, 2015. Prior to fiscal 2015, fees for AUA were not material. Results of Operations In accordance with financial accounting standards on consolidation, we consolidate and separately identify certain sponsored investment vehicles. The consolidation of these investment vehicles has no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and does not have a material impact on our consolidated operating results. We also hold investments in other consolidated sponsored investment funds and the change in the value of these investments, which is recorded in Other non-operating income (expense), is reflected in our Net Income (Loss), net of amounts allocated to noncontrolling interests, if any. See Notes 1, 3, and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the consolidation of investment vehicles. Operating Revenues The components of total operating revenues (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were as follows: Years Ended March 31, 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 2015 2014 2013 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change Investment advisory fees: Separate accounts $ 824.2 $ 777.4 $ 730.3 $ Funds Performance fees Distribution and service fees Other 1,544.5 1,501.3 1,446.1 83.5 361.2 5.7 107.1 347.6 8.4 98.6 330.5 7.2 Total operating revenues $ 2,819.1 $ 2,741.8 $ 2,612.7 $ 46.8 43.2 (23.6) 13.6 (2.7) 77.3 6.0% $ 2.9 (22.0) 3.9 (32.1) 47.1 55.2 8.5 17.1 1.2 6.4% 3.8 8.6 5.2 16.7 2.8% $ 129.1 4.9% Total operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 2015, were $2.82 billion, an increase of 2.8% from $2.74 billion for the year ended March 31, 2014. This increase was primarily due to the impact of a 6% increase in average long-term AUM, offset in part by a decrease in performance fees. Although equity AUM comprised a higher percentage of our total AUM as of March 31, 2015, as compared to March 31, 2014, average AUM advisory revenue yields, excluding performance fees, were 34 basis points in both the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, due to a slightly less favorable product mix, with lower yielding products comprising a higher percentage of our total average AUM for the year ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2014. Total operating revenues for the year ended March 31, 2014, were $2.74 billion, an increase of 4.9% from $2.61 billion for the year ended March 31, 2013. This increase was primarily due to the impact of a 3% increase in average long-term AUM. Average AUM advisory revenue yields, excluding performance fees, were 34 basis points in both the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. 28 Legg Mason AR2015Investment Advisory Fees from Separate Accounts For the year ended March 31, 2015, investment advisory fees from separate accounts increased $46.8 million, or 6.0%, to $824.2 million, as compared to $777.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2014. Of this increase, $34.7 million was due to higher average equity assets managed by ClearBridge, $29.5 million was due to higher average fixed income assets managed by Western Asset and Brandywine, and $17.4 million was due to Martin Currie, including an increase in revenues related to MC Australia. These increases were offset in part by approximately $25 million of revenues associated with certain existing client assets which were reclassified from AUM to AUA during the year ended March 31, 2015, as previously discussed. These revenues are now included in Distribution and service fees for fiscal 2015. The increases were also offset in part by a decrease of $15.8 million resulting from the sale of LMIC in November 2014. For the year ended March 31, 2014, investment advisory fees from separate accounts increased $47.1 million, or 6.4%, to $777.4 million, as compared to $730.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2013. Of this increase, $32.8 million was the result of higher average equity assets managed by ClearBridge, $23.2 million resulted from higher revenues at Permal, including those resulting from the acquisition of Fauchier Partners Management Limited (“Fauchier”) in March 2013, and $7.9 million was due to higher average fixed income assets managed by Brandywine. These increases were offset in part by a decrease of $17.6 million due to lower average equity assets managed by Batterymarch and a decrease of $6.8 million due to the sale of a small affiliate in August 2013. Investment Advisory Fees from Funds For the year ended March 31, 2015, investment advisory fees from funds increased $43.2 million, or 2.9%, to $1.54 billion, as compared to $1.50 billion for the year ended March 31, 2014. Of this increase, $80.1 million was due to higher average equity assets managed by ClearBridge, $30.5 million was due to higher average fixed income assets managed by Brandywine and Western Asset, and $14.7 million was due to Martin Currie, including the increase in revenues related to MC Australia. These increases were offset in part by a decrease of $40.5 million due to lower average equity assets managed by Royce, a decrease of $33.8 million due to lower average assets managed by Permal, and a net decrease of $9.3 million in fees from liquidity assets, due to fee waivers on liquidity funds managed by Western Asset, primarily to maintain certain yields to investors. For the year ended March 31, 2014, investment advisory fees from funds increased $55.2 million, or 3.8%, to $1.5 billion, as compared to $1.4 billion for the year ended March 31, 2013. Of this increase, $85.6 million was due to higher average equity assets managed by ClearBridge and $16.5 million was due to higher average fixed income assets managed by Brandywine, offset in part by a decrease of $48.7 million due to lower average fixed income assets managed by Western Asset. Investment Advisory Performance Fees Of our total AUM as of March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, approximately 7%, 6%, and 6% was in accounts that were eligible to earn performance fees. For the year ended March 31, 2015, performance fees decreased $23.6 million to $83.5 million, as compared to $107.1 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to lower fees earned on assets managed at Permal, offset in part by an increase in fees earned on assets managed at Brandywine. For the year ended March 31, 2014, performance fees increased $8.5 million to $107.1 million, as compared to $98.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to higher fees earned on assets managed at Permal, including those resulting from the Fauchier acquisition, offset in part by the impact of $32.0 million of fees received by Western Asset in the prior year, related to the wind- down of its participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Public- Private Investment Program (“PPIP”). Strong performance fees were heavily influenced by strong equity markets in fiscal 2014. Distribution and Service Fees For the year ended March 31, 2015, distribution and service fees increased $13.6 million, or 3.9%, to $361.2 million, as compared to $347.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily as a result of approximately $25 million of revenues related to client assets that were reclassified from AUM to AUA, as previously discussed, the revenues associated with which are now included in Distribution and service fees for fiscal 2015, as well as an increase in average mutual fund AUM subject to distribution and service fees. These increases were offset in part by the impact of increased fee waivers related to liquidity funds managed by Western Asset. For the year ended March 31, 2014, distribution and service fees increased $17.1 million, or 5.2%, to $347.6 million, as compared to $330.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, resulting from an increase in average fee rates received on mutual fund AUM subject to distribution and service fees. 29 Legg Mason AR2015Operating Expenses The components of total operating expenses (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were as follows: Years Ended March 31, 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 2015 2014 2013 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change Compensation and benefits $ 1,232.8 $ 1,210.4 $ 1,188.5 $ Distribution and servicing Communications and technology Occupancy Amortization of intangible assets Impairment of intangible assets 594.8 182.4 109.7 2.6 – 619.1 157.9 115.2 12.3 – Other 198.6 196.0 600.6 149.7 171.9 14.0 734.0 188.4 Total operating expenses $ 2,320.9 $ 2,310.9 $ 3,047.1 $ 22.4 (24.3) 24.5 (5.5) (9.7) – 2.6 10.0 1.9% $ (3.9) 15.5 (4.8) (78.9) n/m 1.3 21.9 18.5 8.2 (56.7) (1.7) (734.0) 7.6 1.8% 3.1 5.5 (33.0) (12.1) n/m 4.0 0.4% $ (736.2) (24.2)% n/m — not meaningful Total operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2015, remained relatively flat at $2.32 billion, as compared to $2.31 billion, for the year ended March 31, 2014. Total operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2014, were $2.31 billion, a decrease of 24.2% from $3.05 billion, for the year ended March 31, 2013, with the decrease primarily attributable to $734.0 million of intangible asset impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2013, as further discussed below. Operating expenses for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 incurred at the investment management affiliate level comprised approximately 70% of total operating expenses in each year, excluding the impairment charges, which are deemed to be corporate expenses. The remaining operating expenses are comprised of corporate costs, including Legg Mason Global Distribution (“LMGD”) costs. Compensation and Benefits The components of Total Compensation and Benefits (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were as follows: Years Ended March 31, 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 2015 2014 2013 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change Salaries and incentives $ 976.9 $ 949.5 $ 926.6 $ Benefits and payroll taxes 214.7 214.5 204.8 (including deferred compensation) Transition costs and severance Gains on deferred compensation and seed capital investments 31.8 9.4 29.4 17.0 20.6 36.5 27.4 0.2 2.4 (7.6) 2.9% $ 0.1 8.2 (44.7) 22.9 9.7 8.8 (19.5) 2.5% 4.7 42.7 (53.4) Total Compensation and Benefits $ 1,232.8 $ 1,210.4 $ 1,188.5 $ 22.4 1.9% $ 21.9 1.8% 30 Legg Mason AR2015Total Compensation and Benefits for the year ended March 31, 2015, increased 1.9% to $1.23 billion, as compared to $1.21 billion for the year ended March 31, 2014; and for the year ended March 31, 2014, increased 1.8% to $1.21 billion, as compared to $1.19 billion for the year ended March 31, 2013: • Salaries and incentives increased $27.4 million, to $976.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2015, as compared to $949.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, principally due to an increase of $15.8 million in incentive- based compensation for distribution and corporate personnel, primarily related to increased retail sales in our global distribution group. A $9.7 million increase in net compensation at investment affiliates also contributed to the increase. The increase in net compensation at investment affiliates was primarily due to the acquisition of Martin Currie and the impact of increased revenues at certain revenue-share based affiliates, offset in part by the impact of the sale of LMIC in November 2014 and the sale of a small affiliate and the closing down of certain businesses in connection with our previously discussed corporate initiatives in fiscal 2014. • Salaries and incentives increased $22.9 million, to $949.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $926.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, principally due to a $14.7 million increase in net compensation at investment affiliates, primarily resulting from higher revenues, and a net increase of $8.3 million in incentive-based compensation and salaries for corporate and distribution personnel, partially as a result of increased retail sales. • Benefits and payroll taxes increased slightly to $214.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2015, as compared to $214.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily as a result of an increase in payroll taxes and recruiting costs. • Benefits and payroll taxes increased $9.7 million to $214.5 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $204.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily as a result of a $3.5 million increase in costs associated with certain employee benefit plans, a $2.5 million increase in health insurance expense, and a $2.2 million increase in payroll-related taxes. • Transition costs and severance increased $2.4 million, to $31.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2015, as compared to $29.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to higher compensation costs associated with the previously discussed integration of Batterymarch and LMGAA over time into QS Investors, as compared to compensation costs associated with various corporate initiatives recognized in the prior year. • Transition costs and severance increased $8.8 million, to $29.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $20.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to higher compensation costs recognized in fiscal 2014 associated with the previously discussed corporate initiatives and integration of Batterymarch and LMGAA over time into QS Investors, as compared to compensation costs recognized in fiscal 2013 associated with retention awards granted in fiscal 2012 to certain executives and key employees in connection with our prior Chief Executive Officer stepping down in September 2012 and the subsequent reorganization of our executive committee. For the year ended March 31, 2015, compensation as a percentage of operating revenues decreased to 43.7% from 44.1% for the year ended March 31, 2014, due to the impact of decreased revenues at certain revenue share-based affiliates that retain a higher percentage of revenues as compensation, offset in part by the impact of higher compensation costs for corporate and distribution personnel. For the year ended March 31, 2014, compensation as a percentage of operating revenues decreased to 44.1% from 45.5% for the year ended March 31, 2013, due to the impact of compensation decreases related to a reduction in net market gains on assets invested for deferred compensation plans and seed capital investments and the compensation impact of the wind-down of Western Asset’s participation in the PPIP in fiscal 2013. Distribution and Servicing For the year ended March 31, 2015, distribution and servicing expenses decreased 3.9% to $594.8 million, as compared to $619.1 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to a net decrease of $20.9 million in structuring fees related to closed-end fund launches. 31 Legg Mason AR2015For the year ended March 31, 2014, amortization of intangible assets decreased 12.1% to $12.3 million, as compared to $14.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to certain management contracts becoming fully amortized in December 2013. Impairment of intangible assets was $734.0 million in the year ended March 31, 2013. The impairment charges related to our domestic mutual fund contracts asset, Permal funds- of-hedge fund contracts asset, and Permal trade name. The impairment charges resulted from a number of trends and factors, which resulted in a reduction of the projected cash flows and our overall assessment of fair value of the assets, such that the domestic mutual fund contracts asset, Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts asset, and Permal trade name asset, declined below their carrying values, and accordingly were impaired by $396.0 million, $321.0 million, and $17.0 million, respectively in fiscal 2013. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the impairment charges. Other For the year ended March 31, 2015, other expenses increased $2.6 million, or 1.3%, to $198.6 million, as compared to $196.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to a $5.9 million increase in travel and entertainment expenses, a $5.3 million increase in advertising expenses, and a $4.7 million increase in professional fees. These increases were offset in part by a $14.2 million decrease in expense reimbursements paid to certain mutual funds. For the year ended March 31, 2014, other expenses increased $7.6 million, or 4.0%, to $196.0 million, as compared to $188.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to a $14.7 million increase in expense reimbursements paid to certain mutual funds and a $5.0 million charge for a fair value adjustment to increase the Contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition of Fauchier, as the acquired business had performed better than initially projected. These increases were offset in part by an $8.0 million decrease in franchise taxes, as well as a $5.3 million decrease in professional fees. For the year ended March 31, 2014, distribution and servicing expenses increased 3.1% to $619.1 million, as compared to $600.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, with $15.2 million of the increase due to an increase in average AUM in certain products for which we pay fees to third-party distributors. Communications and Technology For the year ended March 31, 2015, communications and technology expense increased 15.5% to $182.4 million, as compared to $157.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to increases in technology consulting, data management, depreciation expenses, and market data costs, principally resulting from cyber-security and data governance enhancements and the addition of Martin Currie and QS Investors expenses. For the year ended March 31, 2014, communications and technology expense increased 5.5% to $157.9 million, as compared to $149.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in technology consulting, market data, and telephone expenses. Occupancy For the year ended March 31, 2015, occupancy expense decreased 4.8% to $109.7 million, as compared to $115.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to a decrease of $2.0 million in depreciation on furniture and leaseholds and a $1.9 million decrease in rent expense, principally as a result of lease reserves taken on vacant space in fiscal 2014. For the year ended March 31, 2014, occupancy expense decreased 33.0% to $115.2 million, as compared to $171.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to the impact of real estate related charges totaling $52.8 million recognized in fiscal 2013 and a $4.6 million decrease in rent expense, primarily as a result of lease reserves taken on vacant space in fiscal 2013. These decreases were offset in part by $7.9 million in real estate related charges taken during fiscal 2014 in connection with the previously discussed corporate initiatives. Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets For the year ended March 31, 2015, amortization of intangible assets decreased 78.9% to $2.6 million, as compared to $12.3 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to certain management contracts becoming fully amortized in October 2014 and December 2013 and the sale of LMIC, offset in part by additional amortization expense related to the acquisitions of QS Investors and Martin Currie. 32 Legg Mason AR2015Non-Operating Income (Expense) The components of total other non-operating income (expense) (in millions), and the dollar and percentage changes between periods were as follows: Interest income Interest expense Other income (expense), net Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles, net Years Ended March 31, 2015 Compared to 2014 2014 Compared to 2013 2015 2014 2013 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ 7.5 $ 6.4 $ 7.6 $ (58.3) (85.3) 5.9 (52.9) 32.8 2.4 (62.9) (18.0) (2.8) 1.1 (5.4) (118.1) 3.5 17.2% $ (1.2) 10.2 n/m n/m 10.0 50.8 5.2 (15.8)% (15.9) n/m n/m Total other non-operating expense $ (130.2) $ (11.3) $ (76.1) $ (118.9) n/m $ 64.8 (85.2)% n/m — not meaningful Interest Income For the year ended March 31, 2015, interest income increased 17.2% to $7.5 million, as compared to $6.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, driven by higher yields earned on investment balances. For the year ended March 31, 2014, interest income decreased 15.8% to $6.4 million, as compared to $7.6 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, driven by the impact of lower average interest-bearing investment balances. For the year ended March 31, 2014, other income (expense), net, improved $50.8 million, to income of $32.8 million, from an expense of $18.0 million in fiscal 2013. This increase was primarily a result of the impact of a $69.0 million loss on debt extinguishment recognized in connection with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes in May 2012, offset in part by a $19.5 million decrease in net market gains on seed capital investments and assets invested for deferred compensation plans, which are offset by corresponding decreases in compensation discussed above. Interest Expense For the year ended March 31, 2015, interest expense increased 10.2% to $58.3 million, as compared to $52.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in interest accruals for uncertain tax positions and interest accretion on Contingent consideration liabilities related to the acquisitions of QS Investors and Martin Currie. Other Non-operating Income (Loss) of Consolidated Investment Vehicles For the year ended March 31, 2015, other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles (“CIVs”), net, increased $3.5 million to income of $5.9 million, primarily due to an increase in net market gains on investments of certain CIVs. For the year ended March 31, 2014, interest expense decreased 15.9% to $52.9 million, as compared to $62.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2013, primarily as a result of a $5.6 million decrease in the interest accruals for uncertain tax positions and a $4.4 million decrease due to the refinancing of the 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in May 2012 and the five-year term loan in January 2014. Other Income (Expense), Net For the year ended March 31, 2015, other income (expense), net, decreased $118.1 million, to expense of $85.3 million, as compared to income of $32.8 million in fiscal 2014. This decrease was primarily due to a $107.1 million charge related to the refinancing of the 5.5% Senior Notes in July 2014. A reduction in net market gains of $7.6 million on seed capital investments and assets invested for deferred compensation plans, which are offset by corresponding decreases in compensation mentioned above, and a reduction in net market gains of $5.3 million on corporate investments, which are not offset in compensation, also contributed to the decrease. For the year ended March 31, 2014, other non-operating income (expense) of CIVs, net, improved $5.2 million to income of $2.4 million, from expense of $2.8 million in fiscal 2013, primarily due to net market gains on investments of certain CIVs. Income Tax Provision (Benefit) For the year ended March 31, 2015, the provision for income taxes was $125.3 million, as compared $137.8 million in the year ended March 31, 2014. The effective tax rate was 34.0% for the year ended March 31, 2015, as compared to 32.8% for the year ended March 31, 2014. The change in the effective rate was primarily related to the impact of income tax benefits recorded in fiscal 2014 with respect to the U.K. corporate rate reductions, as further discussed below. The impact of CIVs decreased the effective rate by 0.5 percentage points for the year ended March 31, 2015, and increased the effective rate by 0.2 percentage points for the year ended March 31, 2014. 33 Legg Mason AR2015For the year ended March 31, 2014, the provision for income taxes was $137.8 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $150.9 million in the year ended March 31, 2013. The effective tax rate was 32.8% for the year ended March 31, 2014, compared to an effective benefit rate of 29.5% in the year ended March 31, 2013. The change in the effective rate was primarily related to a higher relative proportion of pre-tax income (loss) in jurisdictions with higher tax rates as a result of the lower statutory rates in jurisdictions where certain intangible assets which were impaired in fiscal 2013 were held, substantially offset by adjustments to deferred tax balances and other reserves. In July 2012, the U.K. Finance Act 2012 was enacted, which reduced the main U.K. corporate tax rate from 25% to 24% effective April 1, 2012 and to 23% effective April 1, 2013. In July 2013, the Finance Bill 2013 was enacted, further reducing the main U.K. corporate tax rate to 21% effective April 1, 2014 and to 20% effective April 1, 2015. The impact of tax rate changes on certain existing deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a tax benefit of $19.2 million and $18.1 million on the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively; and impacted the effective rate by 4.6 percentage points in the year ended March 31, 2014, and 3.5 percentage points in the year ended March 31, 2013. The impact of CIVs increased the effective rate by 0.2 percentage points for the year ended March 31, 2014, and reduced the effective rate by 0.5 percentage points for the year ended March 31, 2013. Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and Operating Margin Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2015, totaled $237.1 million, or $2.04 per diluted share, compared to $284.8 million, or $2.33 per diluted share, in the year ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the pre-tax, non- operating charge of $107.1 million ($68.5 million, net of income tax benefits, or $0.59 per diluted share) related to the refinancing of the 5.5% Senior Notes in fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, offset in part by a $20.7 million decrease in costs related to closed-end fund launches, and the net impact of increased operating revenues. Operating margin was 17.7% for the year ended March 31, 2015, compared to 15.7% for the year ended March 31, 2014. Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2014, totaled $284.8 million, or $2.33 per diluted share, compared to Net Loss Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. of $353.3 million, or $2.65 per diluted share, in the year ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to the impact of the pre-tax impairment charges of $734.0 million ($508.3 million, net of income tax benefits, or $3.81 per diluted share), recorded in fiscal 2013, the impact of the $69.0 million pre-tax loss ($44.8 million, net of income tax benefits, or $0.34 per diluted share) on debt extinguishment recognized in connection with the repurchase of the 2.5% Convertible Notes in May 2012, the impact of $52.8 million of real estate related charges recognized in fiscal 2013, and the net impact of increased operating revenues, as previously discussed. In addition, Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. per diluted share benefited from a reduction in weighted-average shares outstanding as a result of share repurchases. Operating margin was 15.7% for the year ended March 31, 2014, compared to (16.6)% for the year ended March 31, 2013. Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information As supplemental information, we are providing performance measures that are based on methodologies other than generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”) for “Adjusted Income” and “Operating Margin, As Adjusted” that management uses as benchmarks in evaluating and comparing our period-to-period operating performance. Adjusted Income decreased to $378.8 million, or $3.26 per diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2015, from $417.8 million, or $3.41 per diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the pre-tax, non-operating charge of $107.1 million ($68.5 million, net of income tax, or $0.59 per diluted share) related to the refinancing of the 5.5% Senior Notes in the year ended March 31, 2015, offset in part by the net impact of increased operating revenues. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, was 23.0% and 22.0%, respectively. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, was reduced by 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points, respectively, due to costs associated with the integration of Batterymarch and LMGAA over time into QS Investors and various other corporate initiatives, as previously discussed. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the year ended March 31, 2014, was also reduced by 1.0 percentage point due to structuring fees related to closed-end fund and real estate investment trust launches during that fiscal year. Adjusted Income increased to $417.8 million, or $3.41 per diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2014, from $347.2 million, or $2.61 per diluted share, for the year ended March 31, 2013. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, was 22.0% and 17.5%, respectively. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the year ended March 31, 2014, was reduced by 1.5 percentage points due to costs associated with the previously 34 Legg Mason AR2015discussed corporate initiatives and restructuring charges related to the integration of Batterymarch and LMGAA over time into QS Investors, and by 1.0 percentage point due to structuring fees related to a closed-end fund launch during that fiscal year. Operating Margin, as Adjusted, for the year ended March 31, 2013, was reduced by 3.5 percentage points due to real estate related charges and management transition compensation costs recorded during that fiscal year, and by 1.0 percentage point due to structuring fees related to closed-end fund and real estate investment trust launches during that fiscal year. Adjusted Income We define “Adjusted Income” as Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., plus amortization and deferred taxes related to intangible assets and goodwill, imputed interest and tax benefits on contingent convertible debt less deferred income taxes on goodwill and indefinite- life intangible asset impairment, if any. We also adjust for non-core items that are not reflective of our economic performance, such as intangible asset impairments, the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, the impact of tax rate adjustments on certain deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-life intangible assets, and loss on extinguishment of contingent convertible debt. We believe that Adjusted Income provides a useful repre- sentation of our operating performance adjusted for non- cash acquisition related items and other items that facilitate comparison of our results to the results of other asset management firms that have not issued/extinguished contingent convertible debt or made significant acquisitions. We also believe that Adjusted Income is an important metric in estimating the value of an asset management business. Adjusted Income only considers adjustments for certain items that relate to operating performance and comparability, and therefore, is most readily reconcilable to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. determined under GAAP. This measure is provided in addition to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc., but is not a substitute for Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and may not be comparable to non-GAAP performance measures, including measures of adjusted earnings or adjusted income, of other companies. Further, Adjusted Income is not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow measures determined under GAAP. Fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities may or may not provide a tax benefit, depending on the tax attributes of the acquisition transaction. We consider Adjusted Income to be useful to investors because it is an important metric in measuring the economic performance of asset management companies, as an indicator of value, and because it facilitates comparison of our operating results with the results of other asset management firms that have not issued/extinguished contingent convertible debt or made significant acquisitions. In calculating Adjusted Income, we adjust for the impact of the amortization of management contract assets and impairment of indefinite-life intangible assets, and add (subtract) the impact of fair value adjustments on contingent consideration liabilities, if any, all of which arise from acquisitions, to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. to reflect the fact that these items distort comparisons of our operating results with the results of other asset management firms that have not engaged in significant acquisitions. Deferred taxes on indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill include actual tax benefits from amortization deductions that are not realized under GAAP absent an impairment charge or the disposition of the related business. Because we fully expect to realize the economic benefit of the current period tax amortization, we add this benefit to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. in the calculation of Adjusted Income. However, because of our net operating loss carry-forward, we will receive the benefit of the current tax amortization over time. Conversely, we subtract the non-cash income tax benefits on goodwill and indefinite-life intangible asset impairment charges and U.K. tax rate adjustments on excess book basis on certain acquired indefinite-life intangible assets, if applicable, that have been recognized under GAAP. We also add back, if applicable, non-cash imputed interest and the extinguishment loss on contingent convertible debt adjusted for amounts allocated to the conversion feature, as well as adding the actual tax benefits on the imputed interest that are not realized under GAAP. We do not adjust for debt extinguishment losses resulting from prepayment fees. These adjustments reflect that these items distort comparisons of our operating results to prior periods and the results of other asset management firms that have not engaged in significant acquisitions, including any related impairments, or issued/extinguished contingent convertible debt. Should a disposition, impairment charge or other non-core item occur, its impact on Adjusted Income may distort actual changes in the operating performance or value of our firm. Accordingly, we monitor these items and their related impact, including taxes, on Adjusted Income to ensure that appropriate adjustments and explanations accompany such disclosures. Although depreciation and amortization of fixed assets are non-cash expenses, we do not add these charges in calculating Adjusted Income because these charges are related to assets that will ultimately require replacement. 35 Legg Mason AR2015A reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. to Adjusted Income (in thousands except per share amounts) is as follows: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 237,080 $ 284,784 $ (353,327) For the Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 Plus (less): Amortization of intangible assets Loss on extinguishment of 2.5% senior notes Impairment of intangible assets Contingent consideration fair value adjustment Deferred income taxes on intangible assets: Impairment charges Tax amortization benefit U.K. tax rate adjustment Imputed interest on convertible debt (2.5% senior notes) Adjusted Income Net Income (Loss) per Diluted Share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders Plus (less):(1) Amortization of intangible assets Loss on extinguishment of 2.5% senior notes Impairment of intangible assets Contingent consideration fair value adjustment Deferred income taxes on intangible assets: Impairment charges Tax amortization benefit U.K. tax rate adjustment Imputed interest on convertible debt (2.5% senior notes) 2,625 12,314 – – – – 139,046 – – – – 5,000 – 134,871 (19,164) – $ $ 378,751 2.04 $ $ 417,805 2.33 $ $ 0.02 – – – – 1.20 – – 0.10 – – 0.04 – 1.10 (0.16) – Adjusted Income per Diluted Share $ 3.26 $ 3.41 $ 14,019 54,873 734,000 – (225,748) 135,588 (18,075) 5,839 347,169 (2.65) 0.11 0.41 5.51 – (1.69) 1.02 (0.14) 0.04 2.61 (1) In calculating Adjusted Income per diluted share, we include the weighted-average of unvested restricted shares deemed to be participating securities and the earnings allocated to these participating securities. For purposes of this non-GAAP performance measure, earnings are allocated in the same ratio to participating securities and common shares. As a result, the inclusion of these participating securities and the earnings allocated thereto do not impact the per share amounts of the adjustments made to Net Income (Loss) per diluted share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders. Operating Margin, as Adjusted We calculate “Operating Margin, as Adjusted,” by dividing (i) Operating Income (Loss), adjusted to exclude the impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on investments made to fund deferred compensation plans, the impact on compensation expense of gains or losses on seed capital investments by our affiliates under revenue sharing agreements, amortization related to intangible assets, income (loss) of CIVs, the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, and impairment charges by (ii) our operating revenues, adjusted to add back net investment advisory fees eliminated upon consolidation of investment vehicles, less distribution and servicing expenses which we use as an approximate measure of revenues that are passed through to third parties, which we refer to as “Operating Revenues, as Adjusted.” The compensation items are removed from Operating Income (Loss) in the calculation because they are offset by an equal amount in Other non-operating income (expense), and thus have no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. We adjust for the impact of amortization of management contract assets and the impact of fair value adjustments of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, which arise from acquisitions to reflect the fact that these items distort comparison of our operating results with results of other asset management firms that have not engaged in significant acquisitions. Impairment charges and income (loss) of CIVs are removed from Operating Income (Loss) in the calculation because these 36 Legg Mason AR2015items are not reflective of our core asset management operations. We use Operating Revenues, as Adjusted, in the calculation to show the operating margin without distribution and servicing expenses, which we use to approximate our distribution revenues that are passed through to third parties as a direct cost of selling our products, although distribution and servicing expenses may include commissions paid in connection with the launching of closed-end funds for which there is no corresponding revenue in the period. Operating Revenues, as Adjusted, also include our advisory revenues we receive from CIVs that are eliminated in consolidation under GAAP. products, amortization related to intangible assets, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, if any, impairment charges, and the impact of the consolidation of certain investment vehicles described above. The consolidation of these investment vehicles does not have an impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. This measure is provided in addition to our operating margin calculated under GAAP, but is not a substitute for calculations of margins under GAAP and may not be comparable to non-GAAP performance measures, including measures of adjusted margins of other companies. We believe that Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is a useful measure of our performance because it provides a measure of our core business activities. It excludes items that have no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and indicates what our operating margin would have been without the distribution revenues that are passed through to third parties as a direct cost of selling our Effective April 1, 2013, we revised our definition of Operating Margin, as Adjusted, to add back the amortization of intangible assets. We have applied this change to all periods presented, and the impact on results or the year ended March 31, 2013 was an increase of 0.7 percentage points. The calculation of Operating Margin and Operating Margin, as Adjusted, is as follows (dollars in thousands): Operating Revenues, GAAP basis Plus (less): For the Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 2,819,106 $ 2,741,757 $ 2,612,650 Operating revenues eliminated upon consolidation of investment vehicles 721 1,950 2,397 Distribution and servicing expense excluding consolidated investment vehicles (594,746) (619,022) (600,582) Operating Revenues, as Adjusted Operating Income (Loss), GAAP basis Plus (less): $ 2,225,081 $ 2,124,685 $ 2,014,465 $ 498,219 $ 430,893 $ (434,499) Gains (losses) on deferred compensation and seed investments, net 9,369 16,987 Impairment of intangible assets Contingent consideration fair value adjustment Amortization of intangible assets Operating income and expenses of consolidated investment vehicles – – 2,625 899 – 5,000 12,314 2,370 36,497 734,000 – 14,019 2,959 Operating Income, as Adjusted Operating Margin, GAAP basis Operating Margin, as Adjusted $ 511,112 $ 467,564 $ 352,976 17.7% 23.0 15.7% 22.0 (16.6)% 17.5 Liquidity and Capital Resources The primary objective of our capital structure is to appropriately support our business strategies and to provide needed liquidity at all times, including maintaining required capital in certain subsidiaries. Liquidity and the access to liquidity is important to the success of our ongoing operations. Our overall funding needs and capital base are continually reviewed to determine if the capital base meets the expected needs of our businesses. We intend to continue to explore potential acquisition opportunities as a means of diversifying and strengthening our asset management business. These opportunities may from time to time involve acquisitions that are material in size and may require, among other things, and subject to existing covenants, the raising of additional equity capital and/or the issuance of additional debt. 37 Legg Mason AR2015The consolidation of variable interest entities discussed above does not impact our liquidity and capital resources. We have no rights to the benefits from, nor do we bear the risks associated with, the assets and liabilities of the CIVs beyond our investments in and investment advisory fees generated from these vehicles, which are eliminated in consolidation. Additionally, creditors of the CIVs have no recourse to our general credit beyond the level of our investment, if any, so we do not consider these liabilities to be our obligations. Our assets consist primarily of intangible assets, goodwill, cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and investment advisory and related fee receivables. Our assets have been principally funded by equity capital, long-term debt and the results of our operations. At March 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents, total assets, long-term debt and stockholders’ equity were $0.7 billion, $7.1 billion, $1.1 billion and $ 4.5 billion, respectively. Total assets include amounts related to CIVs of $0.1 billion. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily invested in liquid domestic and non-domestic money market funds that hold principally domestic and non-domestic corporate commercial paper and bonds, government and agency securities, and bank deposits. We have not recognized any losses on these investments. Our monitoring of cash and cash equivalents partially mitigates the potential that material risks may be associated with these balances. The following table summarizes our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31 (in millions): 2015 2014 2013 Cash flows provided by operating activities $ 568.1 $ Cash flows provided by/(used in) investing activities Cash flows used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes Net change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ (208.0) (507.0) (41.5) (188.4) 858.0 669.6 $ 437.3 137.6 (639.0) (10.9) (75.0) 933.0 858.0 $ $ 303.3 (11.0) (735.9) (5.7) (449.3) 1,382.3 933.0 Cash inflows provided by operating activities during fiscal 2015 were $568.1 million, primarily related to Net Income, adjusted for non-cash items, and net activity related to CIVs. Cash inflows provided by operating activities during fiscal 2014 were $437.3 million, primarily related to Net Income, adjusted for non-cash items, offset in part by net purchases of trading and other investments and a decrease in net activity related to CIVs, primarily due to the wind-down of a consolidated loan obligation (“CLO”). See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the CLO. Cash inflows provided by operating activities during fiscal 2013 were $303.3 million, primarily related to net sales of trading and other investments and results of operations, adjusted for non-cash items, offset in part by the allocation of extinguished debt repayment and payments for accrued compensation. Cash outflows used in investing activities during fiscal 2015, were $208.0 million, primarily related to payments associated with the acquisitions of Martin Currie and QS Investors of $183.7 million (net of acquired cash) and payments made for fixed assets of $45.8 million; offset in part by the proceeds from businesses sold of $47.0 million. Cash inflows provided by investing activities during fiscal 2014, were $137.6 million, primarily related to net activity related to CIVs, offset in part by payments made for fixed assets. Cash outflows used in investing activities during fiscal 2013 were $11.0 million, primarily related to payments related to the acquisition of Fauchier and payments made for fixed assets, offset in part by net activity related to CIVs. Cash outflows used in financing activities during fiscal 2015 were $507.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of long-term debt of $645.8 million, the repurchases of 6.9 million shares of our common stock for $356.5 million, the repayment of long-term debt of CIVs of $79.2 million, and dividends paid of $70.8 million, offset in part by the proceeds from the issuance of $658.8 million of long-term debt. Cash outflows used in financing activities during fiscal 2014 were $639.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of long- term debt of $500.4 million, the repayment of long-term debt of CIVs of $133.0 million, the repurchase of 9.7 million shares of our common stock for $360.0 million, and dividends paid of $62.0 million, offset in part by the proceeds from the long- term debt issuances of $393.7 million. Cash outflows used in financing activities during fiscal 2013 were $735.9 million, primarily related to the repayment of long-term debt of $1.05 billion, the repurchase of 16.2 million shares of our common stock for $425.5 million, the $250.0 million repayment of short-term debt, and dividends paid of $55.3 million, offset in part by the proceeds from the subsequent long-term debt issuances of $1.14 billion. 38 Legg Mason AR2015Financing Transactions The table below reflects our primary sources of financing (in thousands) as of March 31, 2015: Type Available at March 31, 2015 Amount Outstanding at March 31, 2015 2014 Interest Rate 2.7% Senior Notes due July 2019 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ – 5.5% Senior Notes due May 2019 – – 650,000 3.95% Senior Notes due July 2024 5.625% Senior Notes due January 2044 Revolving credit agreements 250,000 550,000 750,000 250,000 550,000 – – 400,000 – 2.70% 5.50% 3.95% 5.625% LIBOR + 1.5% + 0.20% annual commitment fee Maturity July 2019 Redeemed July 2014 July 2024 January 2044 June 2017 Capital Plan and Other Financing Transactions In May 2012, we announced a capital plan that included refinancing our then outstanding Convertible Notes. The refinancing was effected through the issuance of $650 million of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.5% Senior Notes”), the net proceeds of which, together with cash on hand and $250 million of remaining borrowing capacity under a then existing revolving credit facility, were used to repurchase all $1.25 billion of the Convertible Notes. The terms of the repurchase included the repayment of the Convertible Notes at par plus accrued interest, a prepayment fee of $6.3 million, and the issuance of warrants to the holders of the Convertible Notes. The warrants replaced a conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, and provide for the purchase, in the aggregate and subject to adjustment, of 14.2 million shares of our common stock, on a net share settled basis, at an exercise price of $88 per share. The warrants expire in July 2017 and can be settled, at our election, in either shares of common stock or cash. In connection with the extinguishment of the Convertible Notes, hedge transactions (purchased call options and warrants) executed in connection with the initial issuance of the Convertible Notes were also terminated. Also, pursuant to the capital plan, in June 2012, we entered into an unsecured credit agreement which provided for a $500 million revolving credit facility and a $500 million term loan, which was repaid in fiscal 2014, as further discussed below. The proceeds of the term loan were used to repay the $500 million of outstanding borrowings under the previous revolving credit facility, which was then terminated. In January 2014, we issued $400 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2044, the net proceeds of which, together with cash on hand, were used to repay the $450 million of outstanding borrowings under the five-year term loan entered into in conjunction with the unsecured credit agreement noted above. The 5.625% Senior Notes were sold at a discount of $6.3 million, which is being amortized to interest expense over the 30 year term. Also in January 2014, we entered into a $250 million incremental revolving credit facility, which was contemplated in, and is in addition to the $500 million revolving credit facility available under, the existing credit agreement. These revolving credit facilities are available to fund working capital needs and for general corporate purposes and expire in June 2017. There were no borrowings outstanding under either of our revolving credit facilities as of either March 31, 2015 or 2014. In June 2014, we issued $250 million of 2.7% Senior Notes due 2019 at a discount of $0.6 million, $250 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 at a discount of $0.5 million, and an additional $150 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2044 at a premium of $9.8 million. In July 2014, these proceeds of $659 million, net of related fees, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem the outstanding $650 million of the 5.5% Senior Notes. The retirement of the 5.5% Senior Notes resulted in a pre-tax, non-operating charge of $107.1 million in July 2014, consisting of a cash make-whole premium payment of $98.6 million, net of $0.6 million from a reverse treasury lock, to call the 5.5% Senior Notes and $8.5 million associated with existing deferred costs and original issue discount. The financial covenants under our bank debt agreement include: maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.5 to 1 and minimum EBITDA to interest expense ratio of 4.0 to 1. Debt is defined to include all obligations for borrowed money, excluding non-recourse debt of CIVs, and capital leases. Under these net debt covenants, our debt is reduced by the amount of our unrestricted cash in excess of the greater of subsidiary cash or $375 million. EBITDA is defined as consolidated net income (loss) plus/minus tax expense (benefit), interest expense, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangibles, any extraordinary expense or losses, and any non-cash charges, as defined in the agreements. As of March 31, 2015, our net debt to EBITDA ratio was 1.3 to 1 and EBITDA to interest 39 Legg Mason AR2015expense ratio was 13.5 to 1, and, therefore, we have maintained compliance with the applicable covenants. If our net income (loss) significantly declines, or if we spend our available cash, it may impact our ability to maintain compliance with the financial covenants. If we determine that our compliance with these covenants may be under pressure at a time when we either have outstanding borrowings under these facilities, want to utilize available borrowings, or otherwise desire to keep borrowings available, we may elect to take a number of actions, including reducing our expenses in order to increase our EBITDA, using available cash to repay all or a portion of our outstanding debt subject to these covenants or seeking to negotiate with our lenders to modify the terms or to restructure our debt. Using available cash to repay indebtedness would make the cash unavailable for other uses and might affect the liquidity discussions and conclusions. Entering into any modification or restructuring of our debt would likely result in additional fees or interest payments. Our outstanding bank debt agreement is currently impacted by the ratings of two rating agencies. The interest rate and annual commitment fee on our revolving lines of credit are based on the higher credit rating of the two rating agencies. In June 2011, our rating by one of these agencies was downgraded one grade below the other. Should the other agency downgrade our rating, absent an upgrade from the former agency, our interest costs will rise modestly. In addition, our Board of Directors authorized $1.0 billion for additional purchases of our common stock, $14 million of which remained available as of March 31, 2015. The capital plan contemplates using up to 65% of cash generated from future operations to purchase shares of our common stock, and our current approach is to use $90 million per quarter on share repurchases, subject to market conditions and other potential uses of cash. In January 2015, our Board of Directors authorized $1.0 billion for additional purchases of our common stock. Other Transactions We expect that over the next 12 months cash generated from our operating activities and available cash on hand will be adequate to support our operating and investing cash needs, and planned share repurchases, however we would likely need to raise financing, potentially by utilizing borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, if we elect to make any acquisitions. We currently intend to utilize our other available resources for any number of potential activities, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, seed capital investments in new products, repurchase of shares of our common stock, repayment of outstanding debt, or payment of increased dividends. In addition to our ordinary operating cash needs, we anticipate other cash needs during the next 12 months, as discussed below. 40 On October 1, 2014, we acquired all outstanding equity interests of Martin Currie. The acquisition required an initial payment of approximately $203 million (using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014 for the £125 million contract amount), which we funded from existing cash resources. In addition, contingent consideration payments may be due on the March 31 following the first, second and third anniversaries of closing, aggregating up to approximately $483 million (using the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the maximum £325 million contract amount), inclusive of the payment of certain potential pension and other obligations, and dependent on the achievement of certain financial metrics, as specified in the share purchase agreement, at March 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $75.2 million (using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014). Actual payments to be made may also include amounts for certain potential pension and other obligations that are accounted for separately. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the Contingent consideration liability was $70.1 million, a decrease of $5.1 million from October 1, 2014, substantially all of which is attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion. In addition, Martin Currie and the trustees of the pension plan referenced above have recently received a notice that the Pensions Regulator in the U.K. is reviewing the plan’s current structure and funding status. While the review is just commencing, there can be no assurance that the review will not result in accelerated funding. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Effective May 31, 2014, we completed the acquisition of QS Investors. The transaction included an initial cash payment of $11 million, which was funded from existing cash resources. In addition, contingent consideration of up to $10 million and $20 million for the second and fourth anniversary payments may be due in July 2016 and July 2018, respectively, dependent on the achievement of certain net revenue targets, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $13.4 million, and has accreted to $13.6 million as of March 31, 2015. In connection with the integration over time of two existing affiliates, Batterymarch and LMGAA, into QS Investors, we have incurred approximately $38 million in total restructuring and transition costs, of which approximately 10% were non-cash charges, and approximately $29 million have been paid to date. Any additional charges related to the integration are not expected to be material. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Legg Mason AR2015In March 2013, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding share capital of Fauchier, a leading European based manager of funds-of-hedge funds, from BNP Paribas Investment Partners, S.A. The transaction included an initial cash payment of $63.4 million, which was funded from existing cash resources. As of March 31, 2015, approximately $22 million (using the exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the maximum £15 million payment amount) was due under the agreements governing the acquisition of Fauchier for the second anniversary contingent consideration. This amount was funded from existing cash resources and paid in May 2015. In addition, contingent consideration of up to approximately $30 million (using the exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the £20 million maximum contractual amount), may be due on or about the fourth anniversary of closing, dependent on achieving certain levels of revenue, net of distribution costs. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability was approximately $27.1 million as of March 31, 2015, $22.2 million of which relates to the previously discussed second anniversary payment. The decrease of $2.4 million from March 31, 2014, was attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion. We have executed currency forwards to economically hedge the risk of movements in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British pound in which the estimated contingent liability payment amounts are denominated. In June 2013 and March 2014, we implemented affiliate management equity plans that will entitle certain key employees of Permal and ClearBridge, respectively, to participate in 15% of the future growth of the respective enterprise value (subject to appropriate discounts), if any, as further discussed in Notes 1 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Repurchases of units granted under the plans may impact future liquidity requirements. Certain of our asset management affiliates maintain various credit facilities for general operating purposes. Certain affiliates are subject to the capital requirements of various regulatory agencies. All such affiliates met their respective capital adequacy requirements during the periods presented. See Notes 2 and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the acquisitions of Fauchier, QS Investors, and Martin Currie and our debt, respectively. Future Outlook As described above, we currently project that our cash flows from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our present and foreseeable, near-term liquidity needs. As of March 31, 2015, we had approximately $400 million in cash and cash equivalents in excess of our working capital requirements. As previously discussed, we intend to utilize up to $90 million of cash generated from future operations to purchase shares of our common stock during each quarter of the year ending March 31, 2016, subject to market conditions and other cash needs. As of March 31, 2015, we also had undrawn revolving credit facilities totaling $750 million, expiring June 2017. We do not currently expect to raise incremental debt or equity financing over the next 12 months beyond our current levels, unless we enter into one or more acquisitions. However, there can be no assurances of these expectations as our projections could prove to be incorrect, events may occur that require additional liquidity in excess of amounts under our revolving credit facility, such as an opportunity to refinance indebtedness, or market conditions might significantly worsen, affecting our results of operations and generation of available cash. If these events result in our operations and available cash being insufficient to fund liquidity needs, we would likely seek to manage our available resources by taking actions such as reducing future share repurchases, reducing operating expenses, reducing our expected expenditures on investments, selling assets (such as investment securities), repatriating earnings from foreign subsidiaries, reducing our dividend, or modifying arrangements with our affiliates and/or employees. Should these types of actions prove insufficient, or should an acquisition or refinancing opportunity arise, we would likely utilize borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility or seek to raise additional equity or debt. Our liquid assets include cash, cash equivalents, and certain current investment securities. At March 31, 2015, our total liquid assets of approximately $1.0 billion included $378 million of cash and investments held by foreign subsidiaries. Other net working capital amounts of foreign subsidiaries are not significant. In order to increase our cash available in the U.S. for general corporate purposes, we plan to utilize up to $257 million of foreign cash over the next several years, of which only $16 million is accumulated foreign earnings. Due to certain tax planning strategies, we anticipate that we will generate a tax benefit of approximately $12 million with respect to this repatriation and adjusted the tax reserve accordingly in fiscal 2014. No further repatriation of accumulated prior period foreign earnings is currently planned. However, if circumstances change, we will provide for and pay any applicable additional U.S. taxes in connection with repatriation of offshore funds. It is not practical at this time to determine the income tax liability that would result from any further repatriation of accumulated foreign earnings. 41 Legg Mason AR2015Credit and Liquidity Risk Cash and cash equivalent deposits involve certain credit and liquidity risks. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents with a number of high quality financial institutions or funds and from time to time may have concentrations with one or more of these institutions. The balances with these financial institutions or funds and their credit quality are monitored on an ongoing basis. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements Off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), include certain contractual arrangements pursuant to which a company has an obligation, such as certain contingent obligations, certain guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity, certain derivative instruments classified as equity or material variable interests in unconsolidated entities that provide financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support. Disclosure is required for any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. We generally do not enter into off- balance sheet arrangements, as defined, other than those described in the Contractual Obligations section that follows and Consolidation discussed in Critical Accounting Policies and Notes 1 and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Contractual and Contingent Obligations We have contractual obligations to make future payments, principally in connection with our long-term debt, non- cancelable lease agreements, acquisition agreements and service agreements. See Notes 6 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures related to our commitments. The following table sets forth these contractual obligations (in millions) by fiscal year, and excludes contractual obligations of CIVs, as we are not responsible or liable for these obligations: Contractual Obligations Long-term borrowings by contract maturity $ – $ – $ – $ – $ 250.0 $ 800.0 $ 1,050.0 Interest on long-term borrowings and credit 49.1 49.1 48.0 47.6 44.2 786.9 1,024.9 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total facility commitment fees Minimum rental and service commitments Total Contractual Obligations Contingent Obligations Payments related to business acquisitions(1) 134.0 183.1 112.6 161.7 97.7 81.6 75.2 291.1 792.2 145.7 129.2 369.4 1,878.0 2,867.1 Martin Currie Other 483.0 22.3 Total payments related to business acquisitions 505.3 – 40.0 40.0 – – – – 20.0 20.0 – – – – – – 483.0 82.3 565.3 Total Obligations(2)(3)(4)(5) $ 688.4 $ 201.7 $ 145.7 $ 149.2 $ 369.4 $ 1,878.0 $ 3,432.4 (1) The amount of contingent payments reflected for any year represents the maximum amount that could be payable at the earliest possible date under the terms of the business purchase agreements, using the applicable exchange rate as of March 31, 2015, for amounts denominated in other than the U.S. dollar. The related contingent consideration liabilities had a fair value of $110.8 million as of March 31, 2015, net of certain potential pension and other obligations related to Martin Currie. See Notes 2 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) The table above does not include approximately $34.3 million in capital commitments to investment partnerships in which Legg Mason is a limited partner. These obligations will be outstanding, or funded as required, through the end of the commitment periods running through fiscal 2021. (3) The table above does not include amounts for uncertain tax positions of $68.1 million (net of the federal benefit for state tax liabilities), because the timing of any related cash outflows cannot be reliably estimated. (4) The table above does not include redeemable noncontrolling interests, primarily related to CIVs, of $45.5 million, because the timing of any related cash outflows cannot be reliably estimated. (5) The table above excludes potential obligations arising from the ultimate settlement of awards under the affiliate management equity plans with key employees of Permal and ClearBridge due to the uncertainty of the timing and amounts ultimately payable. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding affiliate management equity plans. 42 Legg Mason AR2015Market Risk We maintain an enterprise risk management program to oversee and coordinate risk management activities of Legg Mason and its subsidiaries. Under the program, certain risk activities are managed at the subsidiary level. The following describes certain aspects of our business that are sensitive to market risk. Revenues and Net Income (Loss) The majority of our revenue is calculated from the market value of our AUM. Accordingly, a decline in the value of the underlying securities will cause our AUM, and thus our revenues, to decrease. In addition, our fixed income and liquidity AUM are subject to the impact of interest rate fluctuations, as rising interest rates may tend to reduce the market value of bonds held in various mutual fund portfolios or separately managed accounts. In the ordinary course of our business, we may also reduce or waive investment management fees, or limit total expenses, on certain products or services for particular time periods to manage fund expenses, or for other reasons, and to help retain or increase managed assets. Market conditions, such as the current historical low interest rate environment, may lead us to take such actions. Performance fees may be earned on certain investment advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks, and strong markets tend to increase these fees. Declines in market values of AUM will result in reduced fee revenues and net income. We generally earn higher fees on equity assets than fees charged for fixed income and liquidity assets. Declines in market values of AUM in this asset class will have a greater impact on our revenues. In addition, under revenue sharing agreements, certain of our affiliates retain different percentages of revenues to cover their costs, including compensation. Our net income (loss), profit margin and compensation as a percentage of operating revenues are impacted based on which affiliates generate our revenues, and a change in AUM at one subsidiary can have a dramatically different effect on our revenues and earnings than an equal change at another subsidiary. Trading and Non-trading Assets Our trading and non-trading assets are comprised of investment securities, including seed capital in sponsored mutual funds and products, limited partnerships, limited liability companies and certain other investment products. Trading and other current investments, excluding CIVs, at March 31, 2015 and 2014, subject to risk of security price fluctuations are summarized in the table below (in thousands): Investment securities, excluding CIVs: Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans $ 80,529 $ 109,648 Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other trading investments Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans, 358,034 16,172 335,456 22,622 proprietary fund products and other investments Total current investments, excluding CIVs $ 454,735 $ 467,726 2015 2014 Approximately $31.8 million and $33.7 million of trading and other current investments related to long-term incentive compensation plans as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, have offsetting liabilities such that fluctuation in the market value of these assets and the related liabilities will not have a material effect on our net income (loss) or liquidity. However, it will have an impact on our compensation expense with a corresponding offset in other non-operating income (expense). Trading and other current investments of $57.4 million and $90.0 million at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, relate to other long-term incentive plans for which the related liabilities do not completely offset due to vesting provisions. Therefore, fluctuations in the market value of these trading investments will impact our compensation expense, non- operating income (expense) and net income (loss). Approximately $365.5 million and $344.0 million of trading and other current investments at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are investments in proprietary fund products and other investments for which fluctuations in market value will impact our non-operating income (expense). Of these amounts, the fluctuations in market value related to approximately $37.5 million and $19.9 million of proprietary fund products as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, have offsetting compensation expense under revenue share agreements. The fluctuations in market value related to approximately $163.0 million and $109.8 million in proprietary fund products as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are substantially offset by gains (losses) on market hedges and therefore do not materially impact Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Investments in proprietary fund products are not liquidated before the related fund establishes a track record, has other investors, or a decision is made to no longer pursue the strategy. 43 Legg Mason AR2015Non-trading assets, excluding CIVs, at March 31, 2015 and 2014, subject to risk of security price fluctuations are summarized in the table below (in thousands): Investment securities, excluding CIVs: Available-for-sale Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs Other investments Total non-trading assets, excluding CIVs 2015 2014 $ – $ 14,511 48,344 77 12,072 24,464 62,973 90 $ 62,932 $ 99,599 Investment securities of CIVs totaled $48.0 million and $50.5 million as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and investments of CIVs totaled $31.8 million as of March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, we held equity investments in the CIVs of $15.6 million and $39.4 million, respectively. Fluctuations in the market value of investments of CIVs in excess of our equity investment will not impact Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. However, it may have an impact on other non-operating income (expense) of CIVs with a corre sponding offset in Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests. Valuation of trading and non-trading investments is described below within Critical Accounting Policies under the heading “Valuation of Financial Instruments.” See Notes 1 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of derivatives. The following is a summary of the effect of a 10% increase or decrease in the market values of our financial instruments subject to market valuation risks at March 31, 2015 (in thousands): Carrying Value Fair Value Assuming a 10% Increase(1) Fair Value Assuming a 10% Decrease(1) Investment securities, excluding CIVs: Trading investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans $ 80,529 $ 88,582 $ Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other trading investments 358,034 Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans, 16,172 393,837 17,789 72,476 322,231 14,555 proprietary fund products and other investments Total current investments, excluding CIVs Investments in CIVs Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs Other investments 454,735 500,208 409,262 15,553 14,511 48,344 77 17,108 15,962 53,178 85 13,998 13,060 43,510 69 Total investments subject to market risk $ 533,220 $ 586,541 $ 479,899 (1) Gains and losses related to certain investments in deferred compensation plans and proprietary fund products are directly offset by a corresponding adjustment to compensation expense and related liability. In addition, investments in proprietary fund products of approximately $163.0 million have been economically hedged to limit market risk. As a result, a 10% increase or decrease in the unrealized market value of our financial instruments subject to market valuation risks would result in a $26.4 million increase or decrease in our pre-tax earnings as of March 31, 2015. Also, as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, cash and cash equivalents included $353.3 million and $456.6 million, respectively, of money market funds. 44 Legg Mason AR2015Foreign Exchange Sensitivity Consolidation We operate primarily in the U.S., but provide services, earn revenues and incur expenses outside the U.S. Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for currencies, principally in the U.K., Brazil, Japan, Canada, Singapore, Australia, and those denominated in the euro, may impact our AUM, revenues, expenses, comprehensive income (loss) and net income (loss). We and certain of our affiliates have entered into forward contracts to manage a portion of the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on their results of operations. We do not expect foreign currency fluctuations to have a material effect on our net income (loss) or liquidity. Interest Rate Risk Exposure to interest rate changes on our outstanding debt is substantially mitigated as our $250 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due July 2024 and $550 million of 5.625% Senior Notes due July 2044 are at fixed interest rates. In June 2014, we entered into an interest rate swap contract, designated as a fair value hedge, to effectively convert our $250 million of 2.7% Senior Notes due July 2019 from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. As of March 31, 2015, and as a result of the interest rate swap, we estimate that a 1% change in interest rates would result in a net annual change to interest expense of $2.5 million. On an economic basis, the interest rate swap contract wholly or partially hedges interest rate exposure on operating cash. See Notes 6 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of debt and derivatives and hedging, respectively. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Accounting policies are an integral part of the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Understanding these policies, therefore, is a key factor in understanding our reported results of operations and financial position. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our significant accounting policies and other information. Certain critical accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements. Due to their nature, estimates involve judgment based upon available information. Therefore, actual results or amounts could differ from estimates and the difference could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies that involve significant estimates or judgments. In the normal course of our business, we sponsor and manage various types of investment vehicles. For our services, we are entitled to receive management fees and may be eligible, under certain circumstances, to receive additional subordinate management fees or other incentive fees. Our exposure to risk in these entities is generally limited to any equity investment we have made or are required to make, and any earned but uncollected management fees. Uncollected management fees from managed investment vehicles were not material at March 31, 2015, we have not issued any investment performance guarantees to these investment vehicles or their investors, and we did not sell or transfer assets to any of these investment vehicles. In accordance with financial accounting standards, we consolidate certain sponsored investment vehicles, some of which are designated as CIVs. Certain investment vehicles we sponsor and are the manager of are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) (further described below) while others are considered to be voting rights entities (“VREs”) subject to traditional consolidation concepts based on ownership rights. Investment vehicles that are considered VREs are consolidated if we have a controlling financial interest in the investment vehicle, absent substantive investor rights to replace the manager of the entity (kick-out rights). We may also fund the initial cash investment in certain VRE investment vehicles to generate an investment performance track record in order to attract third-party investors in the product. Our initial investment in a new product typically represents 100% of the ownership in that product. As further discussed below, these “seed capital investments” are consolidated as long as we maintain a controlling financial interest in the product, but they are not designated as CIVs unless the investment is longer-term. A VIE is an entity which does not have adequate equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; or the equity investors, as a group, do not have the normal characteristics of equity for a potential controlling financial interest. Investment Company VIEs For most sponsored investment funds deemed to be investment companies, including money market funds, we determine we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE if we absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, or receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, if any. Our determination of expected residual returns excludes gross fees paid to a decision maker if certain criteria are met. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of an investment company VIE, we consider 45 Legg Mason AR2015both qualitative and quantitative factors such as the voting rights of the equity holders; economic participation of all parties, including how fees are earned and paid to us; related party (including employees’) ownership; guarantees and implied relationships. In determining the primary beneficiary, we must make assumptions and estimates about, among other things, the future performance of the underlying assets held by the VIE, including investment returns, cash flows, and credit and interest rate risks. In determining whether a VIE is significant for disclosure purposes, we consider the same factors used for determination of the primary beneficiary. Other VIEs For other sponsored investment funds that do not meet the investment company criteria, such as collateralized debt obligation entities and CLO entities, we determine on a fund by fund basis if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE if we have both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, that potentially could be significant to the VIE. We consider the management fee structure, including the seniority level of our fees, the current and expected economic performance of the entity, as well as other provisions included in the governing documents that might restrict or guarantee an expected loss or residual return. In evaluating whether we have the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, that could potentially be significant to a VIE, we consider factors regarding the design, terms, and characteristics of the investment vehicles, including the following qualitative factors: if we have involvement with the investment vehicle beyond providing management services; if we hold equity or debt interests in the investment vehicle; if we have transferred any assets to the investment vehicle; if the potential aggregate fees in future periods are insignificant relative to the potential cash flows of the investment vehicle; and if the variability of the expected fees in relation to the potential cash flows of the investment vehicle is more than insignificant. We must consolidate any VIE for which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. See Notes 1, 3 and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of CIVs and other VIEs. Revenue Recognition The vast majority of our revenues are calculated as a percentage of the fair value of our AUM. The underlying securities within the portfolios we manage, which are not reflected within our consolidated financial statements, are generally valued as follows: (i) with respect to securities for which market quotations are readily available, the market value of such securities; and (ii) with respect to other securities and assets, fair value as determined in good faith. For most of our mutual funds and other pooled products, their boards of directors or similar bodies are responsible for establishing policies and procedures related to the pricing of securities. Each board of directors generally delegates the execution of the various functions related to pricing to a fund valuation committee which, in turn, may rely on information from various parties in pricing securities such as independent pricing services, the fund accounting agent, the fund manager, broker-dealers, and others (or a combination thereof). The funds have controls reasonably designed to ensure that the prices assigned to securities they hold are accurate. Management has established policies to ensure consistency in the application of revenue recognition. As manager and advisor for separate accounts, we are generally responsible for the pricing of securities held in client accounts (or may share this responsibility with others) and have established policies to govern valuation processes similar to those discussed above for mutual funds that are reasonably designed to ensure consistency in the application of revenue recognition. Management relies extensively on the data provided by independent pricing services and the custodians in the pricing of separate account AUM. Separate account customers typically select the custodian. Valuation processes for AUM are dependent on the nature of the assets and any contractual provisions with our clients. Equity securities under management for which market quotations are available are usually valued at the last reported sales price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt securities under management are usually valued at bid, or the mean between the last quoted bid and asked prices, provided by independent pricing services that are based on transactions in debt obligations, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various other relationships between securities. Short-term debt obligations are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The vast majority of our AUM is valued based on data from third parties such as independent pricing services, fund accounting agents, custodians and brokers. This varies slightly from time to time based upon the underlying composition of the asset class (equity, fixed income and liquidity) as well as the actual underlying securities in the portfolio within each 46 Legg Mason AR2015asset class. Regardless of the valuation process or pricing source, we have established controls reasonably designed to assess the reasonableness of the prices provided. Where market prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect fair value, value may be determined in accordance with established valuation procedures based on, among other things, unobservable inputs. Management fees on AUM where fair values are based on unobservable inputs are not material. As of March 31, 2015, equity, fixed income and liquidity AUM values aggregated $199.4 billion, $376.1 billion and $127.2 billion, respectively. As the vast majority of our AUM is valued by independent pricing services based upon observable market prices or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant risk underlying the value of our AUM. Economic events and financial market turmoil have increased market price volatility; however, the valuation of the vast majority of the securities held by our funds and in separate accounts continues to be derived from readily available market price quotations. As of March 31, 2015, less than 1% of total AUM is valued based on unobservable inputs. Valuation of Financial Instruments Substantially all financial instruments are reflected in the financial statements at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value, except a portion of our long-term debt. Trading investments, investment securities and derivative assets and liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets include forms of financial instruments. Unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected in Net Income (Loss) or Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), depending on the underlying purpose of the instrument. For equity investments where we do not control the investee, and where we are not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, but can exert significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the investee, we follow the equity method of accounting. The evaluation of whether we exert control or significant influence over the financial and operational policies of an investee requires significant judgment based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each individual investment. Factors considered in these evaluations may include investor voting or other rights, any influence we may have on the governing board of the investee, the legal rights of other investors in the entity pursuant to the fund’s operating documents and the relationship between us and other investors in the entity. Substantially all of our equity method investees are investment companies which record their underlying investments at fair value. Therefore, under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s underlying net income or loss predominantly represents fair value adjustments in the investments held by the equity method investee. Our share of the investee’s net income or loss is based on the most current information available and is recorded as a net gain (loss) on investments within non- operating income (expense). For investments, we value equity and fixed income securities using closing market prices for listed instruments or broker or dealer price quotations, when available. Fixed income securities may also be valued using valuation models and estimates based on spreads to actively traded benchmark debt instruments with readily available market prices. We evaluate our non-trading investment securities for “other than temporary” impairment. Impairment may exist when the fair value of an investment security has been below the adjusted cost for an extended period of time. If an “other than temporary” impairment is determined to exist, the difference between the adjusted cost of the investment security and its current fair value is recognized as a charge to earnings in the period in which the impairment is determined. For investments in illiquid or privately-held securities for which market prices or quotations are not readily available, the determination of fair value requires us to estimate the value of the securities using a variety of methods and resources, including the most current available financial information for the investment and the industry. As of both March 31, 2015 and 2014, excluding investments in CIVs, we owned approximately $0.3 million of financial investments that were valued on our assumptions or estimates and unobservable inputs. At March 31, 2015 and 2014, we also had approximately $62.9 million and $87.4 million, respectively, of other investments, such as investment partnerships, that are included in Other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, of which approximately $48.3 million and $63.0 million, respectively, are accounted for under the equity method. The remainder is accounted for under the cost method, which considers if factors indicate there may be an impairment in the value of these investments. In addition, as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, we had $16.2 million and $22.6 million, respectively, of equity method investments that are included in Investment securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The accounting guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the 47 Legg Mason AR2015measurement date. A fair value measurement should reflect all of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset, and the risk of non-performance. The accounting guidance for fair value measurements establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs for valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Our financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories: • Level 1 — Financial instruments for which prices are quoted in active markets, which, for us, include investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices and equities listed in active markets. • Level 2 — Financial instruments for which prices are quoted for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; prices are quoted for identical or similar assets in inactive markets; or prices are based on observable inputs, other than quoted prices, such as models or other valuation methodologies. For us, this category may include repurchase agreements, fixed income securities and certain proprietary fund products. This category also includes CLO loans and derivative liabilities of a CIV. • Level 3 — Financial instruments for which values are based on unobservable inputs, including those for which there is little or no market activity. This category includes investments in partnerships, limited liability companies, private equity funds and CLO debt of a CIV. This category may also include certain proprietary fund products with redemption restrictions. The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Proprietary fund products and certain investments held by CIVs are valued at net asset value (“NAV”) determined by the fund administrator. These funds are typically invested in exchange traded investments with observable market prices. Their valuations may be classified as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based on whether the fund is exchange traded, the frequency of the related NAV determinations and the impact of redemption restrictions. For investments in illiquid and privately-held securities (private equity and investment partnerships) for which market prices or quotations may not be readily available, including certain investments held by CIVs, management must estimate the value of the securities using a variety of methods and resources, including the most current available financial information for the investment and the industry to which it applies in order to determine fair value. These valuation processes for illiquid and privately-held securities inherently require management’s judgment and are therefore classified in Level 3. Futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price at the end of each day on the exchange upon which they are traded and are classified as Level 1. As a practical expedient, we rely on the NAVs of certain investments as their fair value. The NAVs that have been provided by investees are derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the reporting date. As of March 31, 2015, approximately 1% of total assets (8% of financial assets measured at fair value) and 4% of total liabilities (30% of financial liabilities measured at fair value) meet the definition of Level 3. Excluding the assets and liabilities of CIVs, approximately 1% of total assets (7% of financial assets measured at fair value) and 4% of liabilities (30% of financial liabilities measured at fair value) meet the definition of Level 3. Any transfers between categories are measured at the beginning of the period. See Note 3 and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Intangible Assets and Goodwill Balances as of March 31, 2015, are as follows (in thousands): Amortizable intangible asset management contracts $ 21,729 Indefinite-life intangible assets Trade names Goodwill 3,232,271 59,334 1,339,510 $ 4,652,844 Our identifiable intangible assets consist primarily of asset management contracts, contracts to manage proprietary mutual funds or funds-of-hedge funds, and trade names resulting from acquisitions. Asset management contracts are amortizable intangible assets that are capitalized at 48 Legg Mason AR2015acquisition and amortized over the expected life of the contract. Contracts to manage proprietary mutual funds or funds-of-hedge funds are indefinite-life intangible assets because we assume that there is no foreseeable limit on the contract period due to the likelihood of continued renewal at little or no cost. Similarly, trade names are considered indefinite-life intangible assets because they are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely. In allocating the purchase price of an acquisition to intangible assets, we must determine the fair value of the assets acquired. We determine fair values of intangible assets acquired based upon projected future cash flows, which take into consideration estimates and assumptions including profit margins, growth or attrition rates for acquired contracts based upon historical experience and other factors, estimated contract lives, discount rates, projected net client flows and market performance. The determination of estimated contract lives requires judgment based upon historical client turnover and attrition rates and the probability that contracts with termination provisions will be renewed. The discount rate employed is a weighted- average cost of capital that takes into consideration a premium representing the degree of risk inherent in the asset, as more fully described below. Goodwill represents the residual amount of acquisition cost in excess of identified tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities. Given the relative significance of our intangible assets and goodwill to our consolidated financial statements, on a quarterly basis we consider if triggering events have occurred that may indicate a significant change in fair values. Triggering events may include significant adverse changes in our business or the legal or regulatory environment, loss of key personnel, significant business dispositions, or other events, including changes in economic arrangements with our affiliates that will impact future operating results. If a triggering event has occurred, we perform quantitative tests, which include critical reviews of all significant assumptions, to determine if any intangible assets or goodwill are impaired. If we have not qualitatively concluded that it is more likely than not that the respective fair values exceed the related carrying values, we perform these tests for indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill annually at December 31. We completed our annual impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets as of December 31, 2014, and determined that there was no impairment in the value of these assets as of December 31, 2014. Further, no impairments in the values of amortizable intangible assets were recognized during the year ended March 31, 2015, as our estimates of the related future cash flows exceeded the asset carrying values. We have also determined that no triggering events have occurred as of March 31, 2015, therefore, no additional indefinite-life intangible asset and goodwill impairment testing was necessary. As a result of uncertainty regarding future market conditions, assessing the fair value of the reporting unit and intangible assets requires management to exercise significant judgment. The acquisition of Martin Currie by Legg Mason resulted in the addition of an indefinite-life mutual fund contracts asset, an amortizable separate accounts asset, a trade name asset and goodwill of $135 million, $15 million, $7 million, and $158 million (£84 million, £9 million, £4 million, and £98 million), respectively, using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014. Because the fair values of the Martin Currie indefinite-life mutual fund contracts asset and amortizable separate accounts asset fair values were established as of the October 1, 2014 acquisition date, our December 31, 2014 impairment consideration was limited to a review of AUM trends and other critical valuation inputs, which noted no significant changes. Amortizable Intangible Assets Intangible assets subject to amortization are considered for impairment at each reporting period using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. Significant assumptions used in assessing the recoverability of management contract intangible assets include projected cash flows generated by the contracts and the remaining lives of the contracts. Projected cash flows are based on fees generated by current AUM for the applicable contracts. Contracts are generally assumed to turnover evenly throughout the life of the intangible asset. The remaining life of the asset is based upon factors such as average client retention and client turnover rates. If the amortization periods are no longer appropriate, the expected lives are adjusted and the impact on the fair value is assessed. Actual cash flows in any one period may vary from the projected cash flows without resulting in an impairment charge because a variance in any one period must be considered in conjunction with other assumptions that impact projected cash flows. The estimated remaining useful lives of amortizable intangible assets currently range from four to 12 years with a weighted-average life of approximately 9.3 years. Indefinite-life Intangible Assets For intangible assets with lives that are indeterminable or indefinite, fair value is determined from a market participant’s perspective based on projected discounted cash flows, taking into account the values market participants would pay in a taxable transaction to acquire the respective assets. We have two primary types of indefinite-life intangible assets: proprietary fund contracts and, to a lesser extent, trade names. 49 Legg Mason AR2015We determine the fair value of our intangible assets based upon discounted projected cash flows, which take into consideration estimates of future fees, profit margins, growth rates, taxes, and discount rates. The determination of the fair values of our indefinite-life intangible assets is highly dependent on these estimates and changes in these inputs could result in a material impairment of the related carrying values. An asset is determined to be impaired if the current implied fair value is less than the recorded carrying value of the asset. If an asset is impaired, the difference between the current implied fair value and the carrying value of the asset reflected on the financial statements is recognized as an Operating expense in the period in which the impairment is determined to exist. Contracts that are managed and operated as a single unit, such as contracts within the same family of funds, are reviewed in aggregate and are considered interchangeable because investors can transfer between funds with limited restrictions. Similarly, cash flows generated by new funds added to the fund group are included when determining the fair value of the intangible asset. The Fauchier acquisition completed by Permal in March 2013 included a funds-of- hedge fund business, which, as intended, has been merged with the existing Permal fund business through common management, shared resources (including infrastructure, employees and processes) and co-branding initiatives. Accordingly, the related carrying values and cash flows of these funds have been aggregated for impairment testing. Projected cash flows are based on annualized cash flows for the applicable contracts projected forward 40 years, assuming annual cash flow growth from estimated net client flows and projected market performance. To estimate the projected cash flows, projected growth rates by affiliate are used to project their AUM. Cash flow growth rates consider estimates of both AUM flows and market expectations by asset class (equity, fixed income and liquidity) and by investment manager based upon, among other things, historical experience and expectations of future market and investment performance from internal and external sources. Currently, our market growth assumptions are 6% for equity, 3% for fixed income, and 0% for liquidity products, with a general assumption of 2% organic growth for all products, subject to exceptions for organic growth (contraction) in near-term periods. The starting point for these assumptions is our corporate planning process that includes three-year AUM projections from the management of each operating affiliate that consider the specific business circumstances of each affiliate, with near-year flow assumptions for certain affiliates adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect a market participant view. Beyond year three, the estimates move towards our general organic growth assumption of 2%, as appropriate for each affiliate and asset class, through year 20. The resulting cash flow growth rate for year 20 is held constant and used to further project cash flows through year 40. Based on projected AUM by affiliate and asset class, affiliate advisory fee rates are applied to determine projected revenues. The domestic mutual fund contracts projected revenues are applied to a weighted- average margin for the applicable affiliates that manage the AUM. Margins are based on arrangements currently in place at each affiliate. Projected operating income is further reduced by an appropriate tax rate to calculate the projected cash flows. We believe our growth assumptions are reasonable given our consideration of multiple inputs, including internal and external sources, although our assumptions are subject to change based on fluctuations in our actual results and market conditions. Our assumptions are also subject to change due to, among other factors, poor investment performance by one or more of our operating affiliates, the withdrawal of AUM by clients, changes in business climate, adverse regulatory actions, or loss of key personnel. We consider these risks in the development of our growth assumptions and discount rates, discussed further below. Further, actual cash flows in any one period may vary from the projected cash flows without resulting in an impairment charge because a variance in any one period must be considered in conjunction with other assumptions that impact projected cash flows. Our process includes comparison of actual results to prior growth projections. However, differences between actual results and our prior projections are not necessarily indicative of a need to reassess our estimates given that: our discounted projected cash flow analyses include projections well beyond three years and variances in the near-years may be offset in subsequent years; fair value assessments are point-in-time, and the consistency of a fair value assessment with other indicators of value that reflect expectations of market participants at that point-in- time is critical evidence of the soundness of the estimate of value. In subsequent periods, we consider the differences in actual results from our prior projections in considering the reasonableness of the growth assumptions used in our current impairment testing. Discount rates are based on appropriately weighted estimated costs of debt and equity capital using a market participant perspective. We estimate the cost of debt based on published debt rates. We estimate the cost of equity capital based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, peer-group betas, and company and equity risk premiums. The equity risk is further adjusted to consider the relative risk associated with each Legg Mason indefinite-life intangible asset and our reporting unit. The discount rates are also calibrated based on an assessment of relevant market values. 50 Legg Mason AR2015Consistent with standard valuation practices for taxable transactions, the projected discounted cash flow analysis also factors in a tax benefit value, as appropriate. This tax benefit represents the discounted tax savings a third party that purchased an asset on a given valuation date would receive from future tax deductions for the amortization of the purchase price over 15 years. The Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts of $698 million account for approximately 20% of our indefinite-life intangible assets, and are supported by Permal’s fund- of-hedge funds business. These funds have experienced outflows over recent years and increased risk associated with this portion of Permal’s business. The past several years have seen declines in the traditional high net worth client fund-of-hedge funds business, Permal’s historical focus, which Permal has offset to some extent with inflows in their institutional business. Further, fund-of-hedge fund managers are subject to certain regulatory and market influences, as evidenced in Permal’s growth in institutional funds and separate accounts, adding additional uncertainty to our estimates. Based upon our projected discounted cash flow analyses, the fair value of the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts asset exceeded its carrying value by $88 million and continues to have the lowest level of excess fair value over carrying value of our more significant mutual fund contract intangible assets. Cash flows on the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts are assumed to have an average annual growth rate of approximately 7%. However, given current experience, projected cash flows reflect moderate AUM outflows in year one, and no net AUM flows in year two, trending to moderate AUM inflows in year three. Investment performance, including its expected impact on future asset flows, is a significant factor in our growth projections for the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts. Our market performance projections are supported by the fact that Permal’s two largest funds that comprise approximately half of the contracts asset AUM, have 10-year average returns approximating 5%. Our market projections are further supported by industry statistics. The projected cash flows from the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts are discounted at 14.5%, reflecting the factors noted above. Results for the 12 months through December 31, 2014, were slightly lower than the growth assumptions related to the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts assets impairment testing at December 31, 2013. Assuming all other factors remain the same, our actual results and/or changes in assumptions for the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts cash flow projections over the long-term would have to deviate more than 10% from the previous projections, or the discount rate would have to be raised from 14.5% to more than 15.5%, for the asset to be deemed impaired. Given the relatively small excess of fair value over the related carrying value, and the current uncertainty regarding future market conditions, including the funds-of-hedge funds environment, as discussed above, it is reasonably possible that fund performance, flows and AUM levels may decrease in the near term such that actual cash flows from the Permal funds-of-hedge funds contracts could deviate from the projections by more than 10% and the asset could be deemed to be impaired by a material amount. The domestic mutual fund contracts acquired in the Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”) transaction of $2,106 million, account for approximately 65% of our indefinite-life intangible assets. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $157 billion of AUM, primarily managed by ClearBridge and Western Asset, are associated with this asset, with approximately 40% in equity AUM and 30% in each of long- term fixed AUM and liquidity AUM. Although our domestic mutual funds overall have maintained strong recent market performance, previously disclosed uncertainties regarding market conditions and asset flows and risks related to potential regulatory changes in the liquidity business, are reflected in our projected discounted cash flow analyses. Based on our projected discounted cash flow analyses, the related fair value exceeded its carrying value by approximately $865 million. For our impairment test, cash flows from the domestic mutual fund contracts are assumed to have annual growth rates that average approximately 6%, and reflect moderate AUM inflows in years 1 and 2. Projected cash flows of the domestic mutual fund contracts are discounted at 13.5%. Results for the 12 months through December 31, 2014, compared favorably to the growth assumptions related to the domestic mutual fund contracts asset impairment testing at December 31, 2013. Assuming all other factors remain the same, our actual results and/or changes in assumptions for the domestic mutual fund contracts cash flow projections over the long- term would have to deviate more than 30% from previous projections, or the discount rate would have to be raised from 13.5% to more than 16.5%, for the asset to be deemed impaired. Despite the higher excess of fair value over the related carrying value, given the current uncertainty regarding future market conditions, it is reasonably possible that fund performance, flows and AUM levels may decrease in the near term such that actual cash flows from the domestic mutual funds contracts could deviate from the projections by more than 30% and the asset could be deemed to be impaired by a material amount. Trade names account for 2% of indefinite-life intangible assets and are primarily related to Permal. We tested these intangible assets using assumptions similar 51 Legg Mason AR2015to those described above for indefinite-life contracts. The resulting fair values of the trade names significantly exceeded the related carrying amounts. Discount rates are based on appropriately weighted estimated costs of debt using a market participant perspective, also consistent with the methodology discussed above for indefinite-life intangible assets. Goodwill Goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level and is considered for impairment when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. In estimating the implied fair value of the reporting unit, we use valuation techniques based on discounted projected cash flows and EBITDA multiples, similar to techniques employed in analyzing the purchase price of an acquisition. Legg Mason continues to be managed as one Global Asset Management operating segment. Internal management reporting of discrete financial information regularly received by the chief operating decision maker, our Chief Executive Officer, is at the consolidated Global Asset Management business level. As a result, goodwill is recorded and evaluated at one Global Asset Management reporting unit level. Our Global Asset Management reporting unit consists of the operating businesses of our asset management affiliates and our centralized global distribution operations. In our impairment testing process, all consolidated assets (except for certain tax benefits) and liabilities are allocated to our single Global Asset Management reporting unit. Similarly, the projected operating results of the reporting unit include our holding company corporate costs and overhead, including costs associated with executive management, finance, human resources, legal and compliance, internal audit and other central corporate functions. Goodwill principally originated from the acquisitions of CAM, Permal and Royce, and more recently Martin Currie. The value of the reporting unit is based in part, on projected consolidated net cash flows, including all cash flows of assets managed in our mutual funds, closed-end funds and other proprietary funds, in addition to separate account assets of our managers. Significant assumptions used in assessing the implied fair value of the reporting unit under the discounted cash flow method are consistent with the methodology discussed above for indefinite-life intangible assets. Also, at the reporting unit level, future corporate costs are estimated and consolidated with the projected operating results of all our affiliates. Actual cash flows in any one period may vary from the projected cash flows without resulting in an impairment charge because a variance in any one period must be considered in conjunction with other assumptions that impact projected cash flows. We also perform a market-based valuation of our reporting unit value, which applies an average of EBITDA multiples paid in change of control transactions for peer companies to our EBITDA. The results of our two estimates of value for the reporting unit (the discounted cash flow and EBITDA multiple analyses) are compared and any significant differences, if any, are assessed to determine the reasonableness of each value and whether any adjustment to either result is warranted. Once the values are accepted, the appropriately weighted-average of the two reporting unit valuations (the discounted cash flow and EBITDA multiple analyses) is used as the implied fair value of our Global Asset Management reporting unit, which at December 31, 2014, exceeded the carrying value by a material amount. Considering the relative merits of the details involved in each valuation process, we used an equal weighting of the two values for the December 2014 testing. We further assess the accuracy of the reporting unit value determined from these valuation methods by comparing their results to our market capitalization to determine an implied control premium. The reasonableness of this implied control premium is considered by comparing it to control premiums that have been paid in relevant actual change of control transactions. This assessment provides evidence that our underlying assumptions in our analyses of our reporting unit fair value are reasonable. In calculating our market capitalization for these purposes, market volatility can have a significant impact on our capitalization, and if appropriate, we may consider the average market prices of our stock for a period of one or two months before the test date to determine market capitalization. A control premium arises from the fact that in an acquisition, there is typically a premium paid over current market prices of publicly traded companies that relates to the ability to control the operations of an acquired company. Further, assessments of control premiums in the asset management industry are difficult because many acquisitions involve privately held companies, or involve only portions of a public company, such that no control premium can be calculated. Based on our analysis and consideration, we believe the implied control premium determined by our reporting unit value estimation at December 31, 2014, which is at the lower end of the observed range, is reasonable. 52 Legg Mason AR2015Contingent Consideration Liabilities In connection with business acquisitions, we may be required to pay additional future consideration based on the achievement of certain designated financial metrics. We estimate the fair value of these potential future obligations at the time a business combination is consummated and record a Contingent consideration liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair values of Contingent consideration liabilities are revised as of each quarterly reporting date. As of March 31, 2015, the fair values of our Contingent consideration liabilities aggregate $111 million, relating to our acquisitions of Martin Currie, Fauchier and QS Investors. We estimate the fair value of Contingent consideration liabilities using probability-weighted modeling specific to each business acquisition and its arrangement for contingent consideration. Estimated payments are discounted to their present value at the measurement date. The Martin Currie purchase agreement requires us to pay additional consideration based on the achievement of certain financial metrics, as specified in the share purchase agreement, at certain future dates over the three and one-half year earn-out term. Our modeling of the Martin Currie contingent payment arrangement includes Monte Carlo simulation of projected AUM, performance fees and product performance to determine the related estimated payment amounts. If the expected payment amounts subsequently change, the Contingent consideration liabilities are (reduced) or increased in the current period, resulting in a (gain) or loss, which is reflected within Other operating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Significant increases (decreases) in projected AUM or performance fee levels for Martin Currie would result in significantly higher (lower) Contingent consideration liability fair value and the resulting changes could be material to our operating results. The Fauchier and QS Investors purchase agreements require us to pay additional consideration based on whether certain future revenue thresholds are achieved. Likewise, significant increases (decreases) in projected revenue levels for Fauchier or QS Investors would result in significantly higher (lower) Contingent consideration liability fair value and the resulting changes could be material to our operating results. Stock-based Compensation Our stock-based compensation plans include stock options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based performance shares payable in common stock, restricted stock awards and units, affiliate management equity plans and deferred compensation payable in stock. Under our stock compensation plans, we issue equity awards to directors, officers, and key employees. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, compensation expense for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, includes compensation cost for all non-vested share-based awards at their grant date fair value amortized over the respective vesting periods on the straight-line method. Also, under the accounting guidance, cash flows related to income tax deductions in excess of or less than the stock-based compensation expense are classified as financing cash flows. We granted 0.9 million, 1.2 million, and 1.0 million stock options in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During fiscal 2014, we also implemented management equity plans for two of our affiliates and granted units to certain of their employees that entitle them to participate in 15% of the future growth of the respective affiliate’s enterprise value (subject to appropriate discounts). For additional information on share-based compensation, see Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We determine the fair value of each option grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, except for market-based grants, for which we use a Monte Carlo option-pricing model. Both models require management to develop estimates regarding certain input variables. The inputs for the Black-Scholes model include: stock price on the date of grant, exercise price of the option, dividend yield, volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate, all of which, with the exception of the grant date stock price and the exercise price, require estimates or assumptions. We calculate the dividend yield based upon the average of the historical quarterly dividend payments over a term equal to the expected life of the options. We estimate volatility equally weighted between the historical prices of our stock over a period equal to the expected life of the option and the implied volatility of market listed options at the date of grant. The expected life is the estimated length of time an option will be held before it is either exercised or canceled, based upon our historical option exercise experience. The risk-free interest rate is the rate available for zero-coupon U.S. Government issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options being valued. If we used different methods to estimate our variables for the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo models, or if we used a different type of option-pricing model, the fair value of our option grants might be different. We also determine the fair value of affiliate management equity plan grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, subject to any post-vesting illiquidity discounts. Inputs to the Black-Scholes model are generally deter- mined in a fashion similar to the fair value of grants of 53 Legg Mason AR2015options in our own stock, described above. However, because our affiliates are private companies without quoted stock prices, we utilize discounted cash flow analyses and market-based valuations, similar to those discussed above under the heading “Intangible Assets and Goodwill”, to determine the respective business enterprise values, subject to appropriate discounts for lack of control and marketability. In addition, a valuation allowance was established in prior years for a substantial portion of our deferred tax assets relating to the U.K. and other foreign taxing jurisdictions. While tax planning may enhance our tax positions, the realization of tax benefits on deferred tax assets for which valuation allowances have not been provided is not dependent on implementation of any significant tax strategies. Income Taxes We are subject to the income tax laws of the federal, state and local jurisdictions of the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. We file income tax returns representing our filing positions with each jurisdiction. Due to the inherent complexities arising from conducting business and being taxed in a substantial number of jurisdictions, we must make certain estimates and judgments in determining our income tax provision for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments are used in determining the tax basis of assets and liabilities and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities that arise from differences in the timing of revenue and expense recognition for tax and financial statement purposes. Management assesses the likelihood that we will be able to realize our deferred tax assets. If it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized, then a valuation allowance is established with a corresponding increase to deferred tax provision. Substantially all of our deferred tax assets relate to U.S. federal and state, and U.K. taxing jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2015, U.S. federal deferred tax assets aggregated $702.2 million, realization of which is expected to require $3.5 billion of future U.S. earnings. Deferred tax assets generated in U.S. jurisdictions resulting from net operating losses generally expire 20 years after they are generated and those resulting from foreign tax credits generally expire 10 years after they are generated. Based on estimates of future taxable income, using assumptions consistent with those used in our goodwill impairment testing, it is more likely than not that substantially all of the current federal tax benefits relating to net operating losses are realizable. With respect to those resulting from foreign tax credit carryforwards, it is more likely than not that tax benefits relating to the utilization of approximately $40.0 million foreign taxes as credits will not be realized and a valuation allowance was established in a prior period. Except as it relates to Martin Currie’s deferred tax assets, no additional federal valuation allowance was required in fiscal 2015. As of March 31, 2015, U.S. state deferred tax assets aggregated $186.9 million. Due to limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and taking into consideration state tax planning strategies, a valuation allowance of $34.6 million was established in prior years for state net operating loss benefits generated in certain jurisdictions in cases where it is not more likely than not that these benefits will ultimately be realized. A valuation allowance of $9.4 million was released in fiscal 2015 due to updated forecasts, state law changes, and planned future implementation of various tax planning strategies. Due to the uncertainty of future state apportionment factors and future effective state tax rates, the value of state net operating loss benefits ultimately realized may vary. As of March 31, 2015, we also had a valuation allowance of approximately $18 million for the deferred tax assets related to Martin Currie entities. Of this amount, approximately $17 million was established as a purchase accounting adjustment recorded upon acquisition based on historical and current net operating losses of Martin Currie. To the extent our analysis of the realization of deferred tax assets relies on deferred tax liabilities, we have considered the timing, nature and jurisdiction of reversals, as well as, future increases relating to the tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets. In the event we determine all or any portion of our deferred tax assets that are not already subject to a valuation allowance are not realizable, we will be required to establish a valuation allowance by a charge to the income tax provision in the period in which that determination is made. Depending on the facts and circumstances, the charge could be material to our earnings. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax uncertainties in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. 54 Legg Mason AR2015Recent Accounting Developments See discussion of Recent Accounting Developments in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Effects of Inflation The rate of inflation can directly affect various expenses, including employee compensation, communications and technology and occupancy, which may not be readily recoverable in charges for services provided by us. Further, to the extent inflation adversely affects the securities markets, it may impact revenues and recorded intangible asset and goodwill values. See discussion of “Market Risk — Revenues and Net Income (Loss)” and “Critical Accounting Policies — Intangible Assets and Goodwill” previously discussed. Forward-looking Statements We have made in this 2015 Annual Report, and from time to time may otherwise make in our public filings, press releases and statements by our management, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including information relating to anticipated growth in revenues, margins or earnings per share, anticipated changes in our business or in the amount of our client AUM or AUA, anticipated future performance of our business, including expected earnings per share in future periods, anticipated future investment performance of our affiliates, our expected future net client cash flows, anticipated expense levels, changes in expenses, the expected effects of acquisitions and expectations regarding financial market conditions. The words or phrases “can be,” “may be,” “expects,” “may affect,” “may depend,” “believes,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate” and similar words and phrases are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties and we caution readers that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of Legg Mason is not a guarantee of future performance. on Form 10-K and our other public filings, press releases and statements by our management. Due to such risks, uncertainties and other factors, we caution each person receiving such forward-looking information not to place undue reliance on such statements. Further, such forward- looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligations to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Our future revenues may fluctuate due to numerous factors, such as: the total value and composition of our AUM; the mix of our AUM among our affiliates, asset classes, client type and geography; the revenue yield of our AUM; the volatility and general level of securities prices and interest rates; the relative investment performance of company-sponsored investment funds and other asset management products both in absolute terms and relative to competing offerings and market indices; investor sentiment and confidence; general economic conditions; our ability to maintain investment management and administrative fees at current levels; competitive conditions in our business; the ability to attract and retain key personnel and the effects of acquisitions, including prior acquisitions. Our future operating results are also dependent upon the level of operating expenses, which are subject to fluctuation for the following or other reasons: variations in the level of compensation expense incurred as a result of changes in the number of total employees, competitive factors, changes in the percentages of revenues paid as compensation or other reasons; increases in distribution expenses; variations in expenses and capital costs, including depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges incurred by us to maintain our administrative infrastructure; unanticipated costs that may be incurred by Legg Mason from time to time to protect client goodwill, to otherwise support investment products or in connection with litigation or regulatory proceedings; and the effects of acquisitions and dispositions. Actual results may differ materially from those in forward- looking information as a result of various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including but not limited to those discussed below and those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report Our business is also subject to substantial governmental regulation and changes in legal, regulatory, accounting, tax and compliance requirements that may have a substantial effect on our business and results of operations. 55 Legg Mason AR2015REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING The management of Legg Mason, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Legg Mason; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of Legg Mason are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Legg Mason; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of Legg Mason’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria established in the COSO framework. The effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Legg Mason’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015. Joseph A. Sullivan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Peter H. Nachtwey Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 56 Legg Mason AR2015REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Legg Mason, Inc.: In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Legg Mason, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) at March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Baltimore, Maryland May 22, 2015 57 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands) Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents of consolidated investment vehicles Restricted cash Receivables: Investment advisory and related fees Other Investment securities Investment securities of consolidated investment vehicles Deferred income taxes Other Other assets of consolidated investment vehicles Total Current Assets Fixed assets, net Intangible assets, net Goodwill Investments of consolidated investment vehicles Deferred income taxes Other Total Assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Liabilities Current Liabilities Accrued compensation Accounts payable and accrued expenses Current portion of long-term debt Contingent consideration Other Debt and other current liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles Total Current Liabilities Deferred compensation Deferred income taxes Contingent consideration Other Long-term debt Total Liabilities Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8) Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Consolidated investment vehicles Affiliate management equity plan interests Total Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Stockholders’ Equity March 31, 2015 2014 $ 669,552 2,808 32,114 $ 858,022 56,372 13,455 368,399 118,850 454,735 48,000 169,706 51,750 6,121 1,922,035 179,606 3,313,334 1,339,510 – 161,978 157,514 $ 7,073,977 $ 400,245 208,210 – 22,276 177,879 6,436 815,046 51,706 362,209 88,508 167,998 1,058,089 2,543,556 348,633 68,186 467,726 50,463 186,147 47,677 31,910 2,128,591 189,241 3,171,773 1,240,523 31,810 165,705 183,706 $ 7,111,349 $ 425,466 214,819 438 – 91,586 88,936 821,245 49,618 265,583 29,553 136,656 1,038,826 2,341,481 38,498 7,022 45,520 43,328 1,816 45,144 Common stock, par value $.10; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 111,469,142 11,147 11,717 shares in March 2015 and 117,173,639 shares in March 2014 Additional paid-in capital Employee stock trust Deferred compensation employee stock trust Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income, net Total Stockholders’ Equity Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 58 2,844,441 (29,570) 29,570 1,690,055 (60,742) 4,484,901 $ 7,073,977 $ 3,148,396 (29,922) 29,922 1,526,662 37,949 4,724,724 7,111,349 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Operating Revenues Investment advisory fees: Separate accounts Funds Performance fees Distribution and service fees Other Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Compensation and benefits Distribution and servicing Communications and technology Occupancy Amortization of intangible assets Impairment charges Other Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 824,211 $ 777,420 $ 730,326 1,544,494 1,501,278 1,446,066 83,519 361,188 5,694 107,087 347,598 8,374 98,568 330,480 7,210 2,819,106 2,741,757 2,612,650 1,232,770 1,210,387 1,188,470 594,788 182,438 109,708 2,625 – 619,070 157,872 115,234 12,314 – 198,558 195,987 600,644 149,645 171,941 14,019 734,000 188,430 2,320,887 2,310,864 3,047,149 498,219 430,893 (434,499) Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Interest income Interest expense Other income (expense), net, including debt extinguishment losses of $107,074 in July 2014 and $68,975 in May 2012 Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles, net Total Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Income tax provision (benefit) Net Income (Loss) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 7,440 (58,274) (85,280) 5,888 (130,226) 367,993 125,284 242,709 5,629 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 237,080 Net Income (Loss) per Share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders: Basic Diluted See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements $ $ 2.06 2.04 6,367 (52,911) 32,818 2,474 (11,252) 419,641 137,805 281,836 (2,948) 7,590 (62,919) (17,958) (2,821) (76,108) (510,607) (150,859) (359,748) (6,421) $ $ $ 284,784 $ (353,327) 2.34 2.33 $ $ (2.65) (2.65) 59 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Dollars in thousands) Net Income (Loss) Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation adjustment Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities: Unrealized holding losses, net of tax benefit of $3, $123 and $1, respectively Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities Net actuarial losses on defined benefit pension plan Unrealized gains on reverse treasury rate lock, net of tax provision of $233 Reclassification for realized gain on termination of reverse treasury rate lock, net of tax provision of $233 Reclassification to assets held for sale Total other comprehensive loss Comprehensive Income (Loss) Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 242,709 $ 281,836 $ (359,748) (88,982) (9,424) (23,945) (5) 5 – (9,595) 405 (405) (114) (98,691) 144,018 5,629 (184) 18 (166) – – – – (1) 13 12 – – – – (9,590) 272,246 (2,948) (23,933) (383,681) (6,421) Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 138,389 $ 275,194 $ (377,260) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 60 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Dollars in thousands) Common Stock Beginning balance Stock options and other stock-based compensation Deferred compensation employee stock trust Deferred compensation, net Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions Shares repurchased and retired Ending balance Additional Paid-In Capital Beginning balance Stock options and other stock-based compensation Deferred compensation employee stock trust Deferred compensation, net Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions Shares repurchased and retired Redeemable noncontrolling interest reclassification for affiliate management equity plans Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ $ $ 11,717 74 5 91 (47) (693) 11,147 12,534 83 5 118 (55) (968) 11,717 13,987 8 8 192 (41) (1,620) 12,534 3,148,396 31,910 2,218 45,019 (22,067) (355,829) (5,206) 3,449,190 29,537 1,779 48,143 (19,409) (359,028) (1,816) 3,864,216 5,198 1,803 44,246 (11,303) (423,855) – Allocation from 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes repurchase, net of tax Ending balance – 2,844,441 – 3,148,396 (31,115) 3,449,190 Employee Stock Trust Beginning balance Shares issued to plans Distributions and forfeitures Ending balance Deferred Compensation Employee Stock Trust Beginning balance Shares issued to plans Distributions and forfeitures Ending balance Retained Earnings Beginning balance Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Dividends declared Ending balance Appropriated Retained Earnings for Consolidated Investment Vehicle Beginning balance Net income reclassified to appropriated retained earnings Ending balance Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net Beginning balance Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension plan Reclassification to assets held for sale Foreign currency translation adjustment Ending balance Total Stockholders’ Equity See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (29,922) (2,223) 2,575 (29,570) 29,922 2,223 (2,575) 29,570 (32,623) (1,784) 4,485 (29,922) 32,623 1,784 (4,485) 29,922 (32,419) (1,811) 1,607 (32,623) 32,419 1,811 (1,607) 32,623 1,526,662 237,080 (73,687) 1,690,055 1,304,259 284,784 (62,381) 1,526,662 1,715,395 (353,327) (57,809) 1,304,259 – – – 4,829 (4,829) – 12,221 (7,392) 4,829 37,949 – (9,595) (114) (88,982) (60,742) $ 4,484,901 47,539 (166) – – (9,424) 37,949 $ 4,724,724 71,472 12 – – (23,945) 47,539 $ 4,818,351 61 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands) Cash Flows from Operating Activities Net Income (Loss) Senior Notes: Loss on extinguishments Allocation of redemption payments Adjustments to reconcile Net Income to net cash provided by operations: Impairment of intangible assets Depreciation and amortization Imputed interest for 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes Accretion and amortization of securities discounts and premiums, net Stock-based compensation Net gains on investments Net (gains) losses of consolidated investment vehicles Deferred income taxes Other Decrease (increase) in assets: Investment advisory and related fees receivable Net sales (purchases) of trading and other investments Other receivables Other assets Other assets of consolidated investment vehicles Increase (decrease) in liabilities: Accrued compensation Deferred compensation Accounts payable and accrued expenses Other liabilities Other liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 242,709 $ 281,836 $ (359,748) 107,074 (98,418) – – – – 55,086 62,845 – 4,275 66,245 (13,912) (1,308) 100,387 (12,939) (28,668) 47,357 19,547 (9,936) 114,934 (17,727) 10,314 (14,763) 1,182 (3,321) – 3,037 66,488 (26,805) (643) 118,430 3,276 (2,061) (44,293) 14,105 (24,042) (62,916) 76,968 (7,191) 319 (18,310) (3,719) 68,975 (216,038) 734,000 87,848 5,839 3,295 58,983 (43,684) 5,358 (157,355) 1,725 (11,045) 189,347 (9,712) (1,605) (14,378) (54,964) (530) 8,690 3,112 5,219 Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 568,118 $ 437,324 $ 303,332 62 Legg Mason AR2015CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Payments for fixed assets Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets Change in restricted cash Purchases of investment securities Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities Purchases of investments by consolidated investment vehicles Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments by consolidated investment vehicles Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ (45,773) $ (40,452) $ (38,351) (183,747) 47,001 (25,571) (2,641) 2,688 – – – (55,277) 1,351 (5,801) (4,335) 4,306 (17,328) 199,886 – (7,245) (5,787) 5,272 (98,374) 188,739 Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (208,043) 137,627 (11,023) Cash Flows from Financing Activities Repayments of debt (645,780) (500,439) (1,299,218) Repayment of long-term debt of consolidated investment vehicles (79,179) (133,047) (75,561) Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Debt issuance costs Issuances of common stock for stock-based compensation Employee tax withholdings by settlement of net share transactions Repurchases of common stock Dividends paid Net (redemptions/distributions paid to)/subscriptions received from noncontrolling interests Cash Used in Financing Activities Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 658,769 393,740 1,143,246 (5,250) 24,288 (22,114) (3,940) 25,603 (19,464) (10,289) 1,986 (11,302) (356,522) (359,996) (425,516) (70,815) (10,459) (61,966) 20,438 (55,250) (3,993) (507,062) (639,071) (735,897) (41,483) (188,470) 858,022 (10,894) (75,014) (5,639) (449,227) 933,036 1,382,263 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 669,552 $ 858,022 $ 933,036 Supplemental Disclosure Cash paid for: Income taxes, net of refunds of $(865), $(13,835), and $(2,313), respectively $ 19,578 $ 10,140 $ 32,318 Interest See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 59,039 44,295 40,262 63 Legg Mason AR2015NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted) 1. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation Legg Mason, Inc. (“Parent”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Legg Mason” or “the Company”) are principally engaged in providing asset management and related financial services to individuals, institutions, corporations and municipalities. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest. Generally, an entity is considered to have a controlling financial interest when it owns a majority of the voting interest in an entity. Legg Mason is also required to consolidate any variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. See “Consolidation” below and Note 16 for a further discussion of VIEs. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation, including contingent consideration liabilities and redeemable noncontrolling interests for affiliate management equity plans. All references to fiscal 2015, 2014 or 2013, refer to Legg Mason’s fiscal year ended March 31 of that year. Use of Estimates The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which require management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, including revenue recognition, valuation of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and consolidation. Management believes that the estimates used are reasonable, although actual amounts could differ from the estimates and the differences could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Consolidation In the normal course of its business, Legg Mason sponsors and manages various types of investment vehicles. For its services, Legg Mason is entitled to receive management fees and may be eligible, under certain circumstances, to receive additional subordinated management fees or other incentive fees. Legg Mason’s exposure to risk in these entities is generally limited to any equity investment it has made or is required to make, and any earned but uncollected management fees. Legg Mason did not sell or transfer assets to any of these investment vehicles. In accordance with financial accounting standards, Legg Mason consolidates certain sponsored investment vehicles, some of which are designated as consolidated investment vehicles (“CIVs”). The consolidation of investment vehicles has no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. and does not have a material impact on Legg Mason’s consolidated operating results. The change in the value of these CIVs, which is recorded in Other Non-Operating Income (Expense), is reflected in Net Income (Loss), net of amounts allocated to noncontrolling interests. Certain investment vehicles Legg Mason sponsors and is the manager of are considered to be VIEs (as further described below) while others are considered to be voting rights entities (“VREs”) subject to traditional consolidation concepts based on ownership rights. Investment vehicles that are considered VREs are consolidated if Legg Mason has a controlling financial interest in the investment vehicle, absent substantive investor rights to replace the manager of the entity (kick-out rights). Legg Mason may also fund the initial cash investment in certain VRE investment vehicles to generate an investment performance track record in order to attract third-party investors in the product. Legg Mason’s initial investment in a new product typically represents 100% of the ownership in that product. As further discussed below, these “seed capital investments” are consolidated as long as Legg Mason maintains a controlling financial interest in the product, but they are not designated as CIVs by Legg Mason unless the investment is longer-term. Legg Mason held a longer-term controlling financial interest in one sponsored investment fund VRE, which has third-party investors and was consolidated and included as a CIV as of March 31, 2014, and 2013. During fiscal 2015, Legg Mason redeemed a significant portion of its investment in this fund and as a result no longer had a controlling financial interest in the fund, therefore, the fund was not included as a CIV as of March 31, 2015. A VIE is an entity which does not have adequate equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; or the equity investors, as a group, do not have the normal characteristics of equity for a potential controlling financial interest. Investment Company VIEs For most sponsored investment fund VIEs deemed to be investment companies, including money market funds, 64 Legg Mason AR2015Legg Mason determines it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it absorbs a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, or receives a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, if any. Legg Mason’s determination of expected residual returns excludes gross fees paid to a decision maker if certain criteria relating to the fees are met. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of an investment company VIE, Legg Mason considers both qualitative and quantitative factors such as the voting rights of the equity holders; economic participation of all parties, including how fees are earned and paid to Legg Mason; related party (including employees) ownership; guarantees and implied relationships. Legg Mason concluded it was the primary beneficiary of one sponsored investment fund VIE, which was consolidated (and designated as a CIV) as of March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, despite significant third party investments in this product. As of March 31, 2015, and 2014, Legg Mason also concluded it was the primary beneficiary of 17 employee-owned funds it sponsors, which were consolidated and reported as CIVs. Other VIEs For other sponsored investment funds that do not meet the investment company criteria, Legg Mason determines on a fund by fund basis if it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, that potentially could be significant to the VIE. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason had a variable interest in three collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). Legg Mason concluded it was not the primary beneficiary of these CLOs, which were not consolidated, as it holds no equity interest in these investment vehicles and the level of fees they are estimated to pay to Legg Mason is insignificant. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason had a variable interest in two of these CLOs, which also were not consolidated in either of those periods. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason concluded that it was the primary beneficiary of another CLO in which it held a variable interest. Although it held no equity interest in this investment vehicle, it had both the power to control and had a significant variable interest because of the level of its expected subordinated fees. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the balances related to this CLO were consolidated and reported as a CIV in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, this CLO was substantially liquidated and therefore was not consolidated by Legg Mason as of, or subsequent to, June 30, 2014. Legg Mason’s investment in CIVs as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $15,553 and $39,434, respectively, which represents its maximum risk of loss, excluding uncollected advisory fees, which were not material. The assets of these CIVs are primarily comprised of investment securities. Investors and creditors of these CIVs have no recourse to the general credit or assets of Legg Mason beyond its investment in these funds. See Note 16 for additional information regarding VIEs and VREs. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Restricted Cash Restricted cash represents long-term escrow deposits, cash collateral required for market hedge arrangements, and other cash that is not available to Legg Mason for general corporate use. Financial Instruments Substantially all financial instruments are reflected in the financial statements at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value, except Legg Mason’s long-term debt not designated for a hedging transaction. As discussed above in “Consolidation,” seed capital investments in proprietary fund products are initially consolidated and the individual securities within the portfolio are accounted for as trading investments. Legg Mason consolidates these products as long as it holds a controlling financial interest in the product. Upon deconsolidation, which typically occurs after several years, Legg Mason accounts for its investments in proprietary fund products as equity method investments (further described below) if its ownership is between 20% and 50%, or it otherwise has the ability to significantly influence the financial and operating policies of the investee. For partnerships and LLCs, where third-party investors may have less ability to influence operations, the equity method of accounting is considered if Legg Mason’s ownership is greater than 3%. Changes in the fair value of proprietary fund products classified as trading or equity method investments are recognized in Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Legg Mason generally redeems its investment in proprietary fund products when the related product establishes a sufficient track record, when third-party investments in the related product are sufficient to sustain the strategy, or when a decision is made to no longer pursue the strategy. The length of time Legg Mason holds a majority interest in a product varies based on a number of factors, such as market demand, market conditions and investment performance. 65 Legg Mason AR2015See Notes 3 and 16 for additional information regarding Legg Mason’s seed capital investments and the determination of whether investments in proprietary fund products represent VIEs, respectively. For equity investments in which Legg Mason does not control the investee and is not the primary beneficiary of a VIE, but can exert significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the investee, Legg Mason follows the equity method of accounting. The evaluation of whether Legg Mason can exert control or significant influence over the financial and operational policies of an investee requires significant judgment based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each individual investment. Factors considered in these evaluations may include investor voting or other rights, any influence Legg Mason may have on the governing board of the investee, the legal rights of other investors in the entity pursuant to the fund’s operating documents and the relationship between Legg Mason and other investors in the entity. Substantially all of Legg Mason’s equity method investees are investment companies which record their underlying investments at fair value. Therefore, under the equity method of accounting, Legg Mason’s share of the investee’s underlying net income or loss predominantly represents fair value adjustments in the investments held by the equity method investee. Legg Mason’s share of the investee’s net income or loss is based on the most current information available and is recorded as a net gain (loss) on investments within Non-Operating Income (Expense). A significant portion of earnings (losses) attributable to Legg Mason’s equity method investments has offsetting compensation expense adjustments under revenue sharing agreements and deferred compensation arrangements, therefore, fluctuations in the market value of these invest- ments will not have a material impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Legg Mason also holds debt and marketable equity investments which are classified as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity or trading. Debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value and resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests, and comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes. Debt securities for which there is positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost. Amortization of discount or premium is recorded under the interest method and is included in interest income. Certain investment securities, including those held by CIVs, are classified as trading securities. These investments are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are included in current period earnings. Realized gains and losses for all investments are included in current period earnings. Equity and fixed income securities classified as trading or available-for-sale are valued using closing market prices for listed instruments or broker price quotations, when available. Fixed income securities may also be valued using valuation models and estimates based on spreads to actively traded benchmark debt instruments with readily available market prices. Legg Mason evaluates its non-trading investment securities for “other-than-temporary” impairment. Impairment may exist when the fair value of an investment security has been below the adjusted cost for an extended period of time. If an “other-than-temporary” impairment is determined to exist, the amount of impairment that relates to credit losses is recognized as a charge to income. As of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the amount of temporary unrealized losses for investment securities not recognized in income was not material. For investments in illiquid or privately-held securities for which market prices or quotations may not be readily available, management estimates the value of the securities using a variety of methods and resources, including the most current available financial information for the invest- ment and the industry. In addition to the financial instruments described above and the derivative instruments and CLO loans, bonds and debt, described below, other financial instruments that are carried at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value include Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term borrowings. The fair values of Long-term debt at March 31, 2015 and 2014, aggregated $1,166,697 and $1,135,103, respectively. Except for long-term debt designated for a hedging transaction, these fair values were estimated using publicly quoted market prices or discounted cash flow analyses, as appropriate, and were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as described below. The 2.7% Senior Notes due 2019 designated for a hedging transaction are valued as the sum of the amortized cost of the debt and the fair value of the related interest rate contract designated for a hedging transaction which approximates the debt fair value, and was classified as a Level 2 measurement, as discussed below. Derivative Instruments The fair values of derivative instruments are recorded as assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Legg Mason has used foreign exchange forwards and interest rate swaps to hedge the risk of movement in exchange rates or interest rates on financial assets and liabilities on a limited basis. Also, Legg Mason has used futures contracts on index funds to hedge the market risk of certain seed capital investments. 66 Legg Mason AR2015With the exception of a reverse treasury rate lock contract and an interest rate swap, as further discussed in Note 6, Legg Mason has not designated any financial instruments for hedge accounting, as defined in the accounting literature, during the periods presented. The gains or losses on derivative instruments not designated for hedge accounting are included as Other operating income (expense) or Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), depending on the strategy. Gains and losses on derivative instruments of CIVs are recorded as Other non-operating income (expense) of consolidated investment vehicles, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). See Note 14 for additional information regarding derivatives and hedging. Fair Value Measurements Accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Under accounting guidance, a fair value measurement should reflect all of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset, and the risk of non-performance. The objective of fair value accounting measurements is to reflect, at the date of the financial statements, how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) under current market conditions. Specifically, it requires the use of judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. This accounting guidance also relates to other-than- temporary impairments and is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition. It is also intended to provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The guidance also requires timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses. Fair value accounting guidance also establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs for valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Legg Mason’s financial instruments are measured and reported at fair value (except debt not designated for a hedging transaction) and are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories: • Level 1 — Financial instruments for which prices are quoted in active markets, which, for Legg Mason, include investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices and equities listed in active markets and certain derivative instruments. • Level 2 — Financial instruments for which: prices are quoted for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; prices are quoted for identical or similar assets in inactive markets; or prices are based on observable inputs, other than quoted prices, such as models or other valuation methodologies. For Legg Mason, this category may include fixed income securities, certain proprietary fund products and long-term debt. • Level 3 — Financial instruments for which values are based on unobservable inputs, including those for which there is little or no market activity. This category includes investments in partnerships, limited liability companies, private equity funds and prior to June 2014, CLO debt of a CIV. This category may also include certain proprietary fund products with redemption restrictions. The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy in which a fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Certain proprietary fund products and investments held by CIVs are valued at net asset value (“NAV”) determined by the applicable fund administrator. These funds are typically invested in exchange traded investments with observable market prices. Their valuations may be classified as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based on whether the fund is exchange traded, the frequency of the related NAV determinations and the impact of redemption restrictions. For investments in illiquid and privately-held securities (private equity and investment partnerships) for which market prices or quotations may not be readily available, including certain investments held by CIVs prior to June 2014, management must estimate the value of the securities using a variety of methods and resources, including the most current available financial information for the investment and the industry to which it applies in order to determine fair value. These valuation processes for illiquid and privately-held securities inherently require management’s judgment and are therefore classified in Level 3. The fair value of CLO debt, which existed only through June 2014, was valued using a discounted cash flow methodology. Inputs used to determine the expected cash flows included assumptions about forecasted default and recovery rates that a market participant would use in determining the fair value of the CLO’s underlying collateral assets. Given the significance of the unobservable inputs to the fair value measurement, the CLO debt valuation was classified as Level 3. 67 Legg Mason AR2015Futures contracts are valued at the last settlement price at the end of each day on the exchange upon which they are traded and are classified as Level 1. As a practical expedient, Legg Mason relies on the NAV of certain investments, classified as Level 2 or Level 3, as their fair value. The NAVs that have been provided by investees are derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the reporting date. Any transfers between categories are measured at the beginning of the period. See Note 3 for additional information regarding fair value measurements. Fair Value Option As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason elected the fair value option for certain eligible assets and liabilities, including corporate loans and debt, of the consolidated CLO (see “Consolidation” above and Note 16). Management believed that the use of the fair value option mitigated the impact of certain timing differences and better matched the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities related to the CLO. Unrealized gains and losses on assets and liabilities for which the fair value option was elected have been reported in earnings. The decision to elect the fair value option is determined on an instrument by instrument basis, must be applied to an entire instrument, and is irrevocable once elected. Liabilities measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option were included in Debt and other current liabilities of consolidated investment vehicles in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2014. The CLO substantially liquidated and was deconsolidated as of June 2014. Subsequently, Legg Mason has not elected the fair value option for any other financial assets or liabilities. Appropriated Retained Earnings Upon the election of the fair value option for eligible assets and liabilities of the CLO described above, Legg Mason recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to Appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle on the Consolidated Balance Sheets equal to the difference between the fair values of the CLO’s assets and liabilities. This difference was recorded as “Appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle” because the investors in the CLO, not Legg Mason shareholders, would ultimately realize any benefits or losses associated with the CLO. Changes in the fair values of the CLO assets and liabilities were recorded as Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At March 31, 2014, the CLO was in the final stage of liquidation, and the fair value of its assets and liabilities were substantially equal, and there were no Appropriated retained earnings. As of June 30, 2014, the CLO was deconsolidated. Fixed Assets Fixed assets primarily consist of equipment, software and leasehold improvements. Equipment consists primarily of communications and technology hardware and furniture and fixtures. Capitalized software includes both purchased software and internally developed software. The cost of software used under a service contract where Legg Mason does not own or control the software is expensed over the term of the contract. Fixed assets are reported at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are determined by use of the straight-line method. Equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally ranging from three to eight years. Software is amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three years. Leasehold improvements are amortized or depreciated over the initial term of the lease unless options to extend are likely to be exercised. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Internally developed software is reviewed periodically to determine if there is a change in the useful life, or if an impairment in value may exist. If impairment is deemed to exist, the asset is written down to its fair value or is written off if the asset is determined to no longer have any value. Intangible Assets and Goodwill Legg Mason’s identifiable intangible assets consist principally of asset management contracts, contracts to manage proprietary mutual funds or funds-of-hedge funds, and trade names resulting from acquisitions. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, using the straight-line method, unless the asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Asset management contracts are amortizable intangible assets that are capitalized at acquisition and amortized over the expected life of the contract. The value of contracts to manage assets in proprietary mutual funds or funds-of- hedge funds and the value of trade names are classified as indefinite-life intangible assets. The assignment of indefinite lives to proprietary fund contracts is based upon the assumption that there is no foreseeable limit on the contract period to manage proprietary funds due to the likelihood of continued renewal at little or no cost. The assignment of indefinite lives to trade names is based on the assumption that they are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely. 68 Legg Mason AR2015Goodwill represents the residual amount of acquisition cost in excess of identified tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities. Indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized for financial statement purposes. Given the relative significance of intangible assets and goodwill to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, on a quarterly basis Legg Mason considers if triggering events have occurred that may indicate that the fair values have declined below their respective carrying amounts. Triggering events may include significant adverse changes in the Company’s business or the legal or regulatory environment, loss of key personnel, significant business dispositions, or other events, including changes in economic arrangements with our affiliates that will impact future operating results. If a triggering event has occurred, the Company will perform quantitative tests, which include critical reviews of all significant factors and assumptions, to determine if any intangible assets or goodwill are impaired. Legg Mason considers factors such as projected cash flows and revenue multiples, to determine whether the value of the assets is impaired and the indefinite-life assumptions are appropriate. If an asset is impaired, the difference between the value of the asset reflected on the consolidated financial statements and its current fair value is recognized as an expense in the period in which the impairment is determined. If a triggering event has not occurred, the Company performs quantitative tests annually at December 31, for indefinite- life intangible assets and goodwill, unless the Company can qualitatively conclude that it is more likely than not that the respective fair values exceed the related carrying values. The fair values of intangible assets subject to amortization are considered for impairment at each reporting period using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. For intangible assets with indefinite lives, fair value is determined from a market participant’s perspective based on projected discounted cash flows, which take into consideration estimates of future fees, profit margins, growth rates, taxes, and discount rates. Proprietary fund contracts that are managed and operated as a single unit and meet other criteria may be aggregated for impairment testing. Goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level, and is considered for impairment when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. In estimating the implied fair value of the reporting unit, Legg Mason uses valuation techniques principally based on discounted projected cash flows and EBITDA multiples, similar to techniques employed in analyzing the purchase price of an acquisition. Goodwill is deemed to be recoverable at the reporting unit level, which is also the operating segment level that Legg Mason defines as the Global Asset Management segment. This results from the fact that the chief operating decision maker, Legg Mason’s Chief Executive Officer, regularly receives discrete financial information at the consolidated Global Asset Management business level and does not regularly receive discrete financial information, such as operating results, at any lower level, such as the asset management affiliate level. Allocations of goodwill for management restructures, acquisitions, and dispositions are based on relative fair values of the respective businesses restructured, acquired, or divested. See Note 5 for additional information regarding intangible assets and goodwill and Note 15 for additional business segment information. Contingent Consideration Liabilities In connection with business acquisitions, Legg Mason may be required to pay additional future consideration based on the achievement of certain designated financial metrics. Legg Mason estimates the fair value of these potential future obligations at the time a business combination is consummated and records a Contingent consideration liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Legg Mason accretes contingent consideration liabilities to the expected payment amounts over the related earn-out terms until the obligations are ultimately paid, resulting in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). If the expected payment amounts subsequently change, the Contingent consideration liabilities are reduced or increased in the current period, resulting in a gain or loss, which is reflected within Other operating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). See Notes 2 and 8 for additional information regarding contingent consideration liabilities. Translation of Foreign Currencies Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries that are denominated in non-U.S. dollar functional currencies are translated at exchange rates as of the Consolidated Balance Sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the period. The gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in Net Income (Loss). 69 Legg Mason AR2015Investment Advisory Fees Legg Mason earns investment advisory fees on assets in separately managed accounts, investment funds, and other products managed for Legg Mason’s clients. These fees are primarily based on predetermined percentages of the market value of the assets under management (“AUM”), and are recognized over the period in which services are performed and may be billed in advance of the period earned based on AUM at the beginning of the billing period in accordance with the related advisory contracts. Revenue associated with advance billings is deferred and included in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is recognized over the period earned. Performance fees may be earned on certain investment advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks on a relative or absolute basis, depending on the product, and are recognized at the end of the performance measurement period. Accordingly, neither advanced billings nor performance fees are subject to reversal. The largest portion of performance fees are earned based on 12-month performance periods that end in differing quarters during the year, with a portion also based on quarterly performance periods. Legg Mason has responsibility for the valuation of AUM, substantially all of which is based on observable market data from independent pricing services, fund accounting agents, custodians or brokers. Distribution and Service Fees Revenue and Expense Distribution and service fees represent fees earned from funds to reimburse the distributor for the costs of marketing and selling fund shares and servicing proprietary funds and are generally determined as a percentage of client assets. Reported amounts also include fees earned from providing client or shareholder servicing, including record keeping or administrative services to proprietary funds, and non- discretionary advisory services. Distribution fees earned on company-sponsored investment funds are reported as revenue. When Legg Mason enters into arrangements with broker-dealers or other third parties to sell or market proprietary fund shares, distribution and servicing expense is accrued for the amounts owed to third parties, including finders’ fees and referral fees paid to unaffiliated broker- dealers or introducing parties. Distribution and servicing expense also includes payments to third parties for certain shareholder administrative services and sub-advisory fees paid to unaffiliated asset managers. Deferred Sales Commissions Commissions paid to financial intermediaries in connection with sales of certain classes of company-sponsored mutual funds are capitalized as deferred sales commissions. The asset is amortized over periods not exceeding six years, which represent the periods during which commissions are generally recovered from distribution and service fee revenues and from contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”) received from shareholders of those funds upon redemption of their shares. CDSC receipts are recorded as distribution and service fee revenue when received and a reduction of the unamortized balance of deferred sales commissions, with a corresponding expense. Management periodically tests the deferred sales commission asset for impairment by reviewing the changes in value of the related shares, the relevant market conditions and other events and circumstances that may indicate an impairment in value has occurred. If these factors indicate an impairment in value, management compares the carrying value to the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its remaining life. If management determines that the deferred sales commission asset is not fully recoverable, the asset will be deemed impaired and a loss will be recorded in the amount by which the recorded amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. For the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, no impairment charges were recorded. Deferred sales commissions, included in Other non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $10,422 and $8,031 at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements. Deferred income tax assets are subject to a valuation allowance if, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized. Legg Mason’s deferred income taxes principally relate to net operating loss and other carryforward benefits, business combinations, amortization of intangible assets and accrued compensation. Under applicable accounting guidance, a tax benefit should only be recognized if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained based on its technical merits. A tax position that meets this threshold is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement by the appropriate taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. The Company’s accounting policy is to classify interest related to tax matters as interest expense and related penalties, if any, as other operating expense. See Note 7 for additional information regarding income taxes. 70 Legg Mason AR2015Loss Contingencies Legg Mason accrues estimates for loss contingencies related to legal actions, investigations, and proceedings, exclusive of legal fees, when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Related insurance recoveries are recorded separately when the underwriter has confirmed coverage of a specific claim amount. See Note 8 for additional information. Stock-Based Compensation Legg Mason’s stock-based compensation includes stock options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based performance shares payable in common stock, restricted stock awards and units, management equity plans for certain affiliates and deferred compensation payable in stock. Under its stock compensation plans, Legg Mason issues equity awards to directors, officers, and other key employees. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, compensation expense includes costs for all non-vested share-based awards classified as equity at their grant date fair value amortized over the respective vesting periods on the straight-line method. Legg Mason determines the fair value of stock options and affiliate management equity plan grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the exception of market-based performance grants, which are valued with a Monte Carlo option-pricing model. See “Other Developments” below and Note 11 for additional information regarding stock-based compensation. In conjunction with the December 2012 modification of employment and other arrangements with certain employees of its subsidiary, The Permal Group, Ltd (“Permal”), Legg Mason completed implementation of a management equity plan during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. On March 31, 2014, a similar management equity plan was implemented by Legg Mason for certain employees of its subsidiary ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“ClearBridge”). The plans better align the interests of each affiliate’s management with those of Legg Mason and its shareholders, and provide for, among other things, higher margins at specified higher revenue levels. The affiliate management equity plans entitle certain key employees of each affiliate to participate in 15% of the future growth, if any, of the respective affiliates’ enterprise value (subject to appropriate discounts) subsequent to the date of grant. Current and future grants under the plans vest 20% annually for five years, over which the related grant-date fair values will be recognized as Compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Once vested, plan units can be put to Legg Mason for settlement at fair value, beginning one year after the holder terminates their employment. Legg Mason can also call plan units, generally post employment, for settlement at fair value. Changes in control of Legg Mason or either affiliate do not impact vesting, settlement or other provisions of the units. However, upon sale of substantially all of the affiliate’s assets, the vesting of the respective units would accelerate and participants would receive a fair value payment in respect of their interests under the plan. Future grants of additional plan units will dilute the participation of existing outstanding units in 15% of the future growth of the respective affiliates’ enterprise value, if any, subsequent to the related future grant date, for which additional compensation expense would be incurred. Further, future grants under either plan will not entitle the plan participants, collectively, to more than an aggregate 15% of the future growth of the respective affiliate’s enterprise value. Upon vesting, the grant-date fair value of vested plan units will be reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as redeemable noncontrolling interests through an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. Thereafter, redeemable noncontrolling interests will continue to be adjusted to the ultimate maximum estimated redemption value over the expected term, through retained earnings adjustments. See Note 11 for additional information on affiliate management equity plans. Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. shareholders (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. (adjusted by earnings allocated to participating securities) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Legg Mason issues to employees restricted stock that are deemed to be participating securities prior to vesting, because the unvested restricted shares entitle their holder to nonforfeitable dividend rights. In this circumstance, accounting guidance requires a “two-class method” for EPS calculations that excludes earnings allocated (both distributed and undistributed) to participating securities. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS, but adjusts for the effect of potential common shares unless they are antidilutive. For periods with a net loss, potential common shares, other than potentially unvested restricted shares, are considered antidilutive. See Note 12 for additional discussion of EPS. Restructuring Costs As further discussed in Note 2, in March 2014, Legg Mason entered into a definitive agreement to acquire QS Investors Holdings, LLC (“QS Investors”). Legg Mason is integrating its two existing affiliates, Batterymarch Financial Management, Inc. (“Batterymarch”) and Legg Mason Global Asset Allocation, LLC (“LMGAA”) into QS Investors over time to leverage the best aspects of each subsidiary. The costs anticipated with this integration primarily relate to employee termination benefits, including severance and retention incentives, which are recorded as Compensation and benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). See Note 2 for additional information. 71 Legg Mason AR2015Noncontrolling Interests For CIVs with third-party investors, the related noncontrolling interests are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests if investors in these funds may request withdrawals at any time. Also included in redeemable noncontrolling interests are vested affiliate management equity plan interests. There were no nonredeemable noncontrolling interests as of March 31, 2015 or 2014. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the year ended March 31, 2013 also includes Net income reclassified to Appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended March 31, included the following amounts: Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests Net income reclassified to appropriated retained earnings for consolidated investment vehicle Total Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 5,629 $ 1,881 $ 971 – (4,829) (7,392) 5,629 $ (2,948) $ (6,421) $ $ Total Redeemable noncontrolling interests as of and for the years ended March 31, included the following amounts: Balance, beginning of period Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests Net (redemptions/distributions paid to)/subscriptions received from noncontrolling interests Affiliate management equity plan interests Balance, end of period Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 45,144 $ 21,009 $ 24,031 5,629 (10,459) 1,881 20,438 971 (3,993) 5,206 1,816 – $ 45,520 $ 45,144 $ 21,009 Recent Accounting Developments In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated the guidance on fair value measurement. The updated guidance removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy and related sensitivity disclosures, all investments for which fair value is measured using the NAV practical expedient. The amount of such investments would instead be disclosed as a reconciling item between the fair value hierarchy table and the investment amounts reported on the balance sheet. This guidance will be effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2017, unless adopted earlier. Legg Mason is evaluating the impact of its adoption. In February 2015, the FASB updated the guidance for consolidation requirements. The updated guidance eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or VREs. Additionally, the updated guidance affects the conclusion such that certain fees paid to decision makers are no longer variable interests, and certain related party relationships with a sponsored investment fund may no longer require its consolidation. The update also eliminates the deferral of accounting guidance that requires separate evaluation for investment company VIEs and other VIEs. This update will be effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2017, unless adopted earlier. Legg Mason is evaluating the timing and impact of its adoption. In August 2014, the FASB updated the guidance on measuring the financial assets and financial liabilities of consolidated collateralized financing entities. The update requires that an entity electing to apply the guidance should measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities using the fair value of the consolidated collateralized financing entity’s financial assets or financial liabilities, whichever is more observable. This update also requires certain disclosures by entities that apply its provisions and will be effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2017, unless adopted earlier. Legg Mason is evaluating the impact of its adoption. 72 Legg Mason AR2015In May 2014, the FASB updated the guidance on revenue recognition. The updated guidance improves comparability and removes inconsistencies in revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. This update will be tentatively effective for Legg Mason in fiscal 2018 and Legg Mason is evaluating the impact of its adoption. 2. Acquisitions and Disposition Acquisitions Martin Currie On October 1, 2014, Legg Mason acquired all outstanding equity interests of Martin Currie (Holdings) Limited (“Martin Currie”), pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated July 24, 2014. Martin Currie is an international equity specialist based in the United Kingdom with approximately $9,500,000 in AUM on the date of acquisition. The acquisition required an initial payment of $202,577 (using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014 for the £125,000 contract amount), which was funded from existing cash. In addition, contingent consideration payments may be due March 31 following the first, second and third anniversaries of closing, aggregating up to approximately $483,000 (using the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the maximum £325,000 contract amount), inclusive of the payment of certain potential pension and other obligations, and dependent on the achievement of certain financial metrics, as specified in the share purchase agreement, at March 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $75,211 (using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014). Actual payments to be made may also include amounts for certain potential pension and other obligations that are accounted for separately. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the Contingent consideration liability was $70,114, a decrease of $5,097 from October 1, 2014, all of which is attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion, which is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income as Foreign currency translation adjustment. The Contingent consideration liability is included in non-current Contingent consideration in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2015. The Contingent consideration liability is recorded at an entity with a British pound functional currency, such that related changes in the exchange rate do not impact net income. Purchase price Cash Contingent consideration Total Consideration Identifiable assets and liabilities Cash Indefinite-life intangible fund management contracts Amortizable intangible asset management contracts Indefinite-life trade name Fixed assets Liabilities, net Pension liability Deferred tax liabilities Total identifiable assets and liabilities $ 202,577 75,211 277,788 29,389 135,321 15,234 7,130 784 (4,388) (32,433) (31,537) 119,500 Goodwill $ 158,288 The fair value of the amortizable intangible asset management contracts asset is being amortized over a period of 12 years. Goodwill is principally attributable to synergies expected to arise with Martin Currie. These acquired intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for U.K. tax purposes. Management estimated the fair values of the indefinite-life intangible fund management contracts and indefinite-life trade name, and amortizable intangible asset management contracts based upon discounted cash flow analyses, using unobservable market data inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. The significant assumptions used in these analyses at acquisition including projected annual cash flows, projected AUM growth rates and discount rates, are summarized as follows: Projected Cash Flow Growth 0% to 25% (weighted- average — 11%) Discount Rate 15.0% Indefinite-life intangible fund management contracts and indefinite- life trade name A summary of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, after certain measurement period adjustments, are as follows: Amortizable intangible asset management contracts Projected AUM Growth / (Attrition) 6% / (17)% Discount Rate 15.0% 73 Legg Mason AR2015The fair value of the contingent consideration was measured using Monte Carlo simulation with various unobservable market data inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. The simulation considered variables, including AUM growth, performance fee levels and relevant product performance. Projected AUM, performance fees and earn-out payments were discounted as appropriate. A summary of various assumption values follows: The resulting net benefit obligation, comprised as follows, is included in the March 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet as Other non-current liabilities: Fair value of plan assets (at 6.3% expected $ 59,404 weighted-average long-term return) Benefit obligation (at 3.3% discount rate) (98,110) Unfunded status (excess of benefit $ (38,706) obligation over plan assets) AUM growth rates Performance fees growth rates Discount rates: 0% to 28% (weighted-average — 14%) 0% to 30% (weighted-average — 15%) Projected AUM 13.0% Projected performance fees 15.0% Earn-out payments AUM volatility 1.3% 18.8% Significant increases (decreases) in projected AUM or performance fees would result in a significantly higher (lower) Contingent consideration liability fair value. The Company has not presented pro forma combined results of operations for this acquisition because the results of operations as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) would not have been materially different. The financial results of Martin Currie included in Legg Mason’s consolidated financial results for the year ended March 31, 2015, include revenues of $32,293 and did not have a material impact on Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Martin Currie Defined Benefit Pension Plan Martin Currie sponsors a retirement and death benefits plan, a defined benefit pension plan, with assets held in a separate trustee-administered fund. Plan assets, comprised of 58% equities (Level 1) and 42% bonds (Level 2), are measured at fair value. Assumptions used to determine the expected return on plan assets targets a 55% / 45% equity/bond allocation with reference to the 15-year FTSE UK Gilt yield for equities and UK long- dated bond yields for bonds. Plan liabilities are measured on an actuarial basis using the projected unit method and discounted at a rate equivalent to the current rate on a high quality bond in the local UK market and currency. As of March 31, 2015, there were no significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. The most recent actuarial valuation was performed as of May 31, 2013, which was updated through the acquisition and balance sheet dates. Accrual of service credit under the plan ceased on October 3, 2014. The change in the benefit obligation for the period from acquisition through March 31, 2015 is summarized below: Beginning benefit obligation Interest costs Actuarial loss Benefits paid Plan curtailments Exchange rate changes Period from Acquisition $ 91,750 1,730 14,461 (762) (789) (8,280) Ending benefit obligation $ 98,110 The change in plan assets for the period from acquisition through March 31, 2015 is summarized below: Beginning plan assets Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits paid Exchange rate changes Ending plan assets Period from Acquisition $ 59,317 6,028 1 (762) (5,180) $ 59,404 For the year ended March 31, 2015, a net periodic benefit gain of $815 was included in Compensation and benefits expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The components of the net periodic benefit gain for the period from acquisition through March 31, 2015 are as follows: Interest costs Expected return on plan assets Curtailment gain recognized Net periodic benefit gain Period from Acquisition $ $ 1,730 (1,756) (789) (815) 74 Legg Mason AR2015Net actuarial losses of $9,595, were included in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2015. A summary of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, after certain measurement period adjustments, are as follows: As of March 31, 2015, the plan expects to make benefit payments over the next 10 fiscal years as follows: Purchase price Cash 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021–2025 $ 1,184 1,235 1,324 1,611 1,588 13,788 The contingent consideration payments are expected to provide some, if not all, funding of the net plan benefit obligation, through a provision requiring certain amounts to be paid to the plan. Any contingent consideration payments to the plan are based on determination of the plan benefit obligation under local technical provisions utilized by the plan trustees. Absent any such funding or any regulatory requirement to accelerate funding, Martin Currie expects to contribute $2,228 to the plan during the year ending March 31, 2016. The contingent consideration provisions of the share purchase agreement also require a designated percentage of the earn-out payments, net of any pension contribution, to be allocated to fund an incentive plan for Martin Currie’s management. No payments to employees under the arrangement will be made until the end of the earn-out period. The estimated payment (adjusted quarterly) is being amortized over the earn-out term. QS Investors, LLC Effective May 31, 2014, Legg Mason acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of QS Investors, a customized solutions and global quantitative equities provider. At the time of acquisition, QS Investors had approximately $5,000,000 in AUM and nearly $100,000,000 in assets under advisement. The initial purchase price was a cash payment of $11,000, funded from existing cash. In addition, contingent consideration of up to $10,000 and $20,000 for the second and fourth anniversary payments may be due in July 2016 and July 2018, respectively, dependent on the achievement of certain net revenue targets, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $13,370, which represented the present value of the contingent consideration expected to be paid. The Contingent consideration liability is included in non- current Contingent consideration in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2015 and has accreted to $13,553. Contingent consideration Total Consideration Identifiable assets and liabilities Cash Investments Receivables Amortizable intangible asset management contracts Fixed assets Liabilities, net Total identifiable assets and liabilities $ 11,000 13,370 24,370 441 3,281 2,699 7,060 599 (6,620) 7,460 Goodwill $ 16,910 The fair value of the amortizable intangible asset management contracts had a useful life of 10 years at acquisition. Purchase price allocated to goodwill is expected to be deductible for U.S. tax purposes over a period of 15 years. Management estimated the fair values of the amortizable intangible asset management contracts based upon a discounted cash flow analysis, and the contingent consideration expected to be paid and discounted, based upon probability-weighted revenue projections, using unobservable market data inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. The significant assumptions used in these analyses at acquisition including projected annual cash flows, revenues and discount rates, are summarized as follows: Projected Cash Flow Attrition, Net Amortizable intangible asset management contracts (10)% Projected Revenue Growth Rates Contingent consideration 0% to 10% (weighted- average — 6%) Discount Rate 15.0% Discount Rates 1.2% / 2.1% Goodwill is principally attributable to synergies expected to arise with QS Investors. 75 Legg Mason AR2015The Company has not presented pro forma combined results of operations for this acquisition because the results of operations as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) would not have been materially different. The financial results of QS Investors included in Legg Mason’s consolidated financial results for the year ended March 31, 2015, include revenues of $12,340, and did not have a material impact on Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Over time, Legg Mason is integrating two existing affiliates, Batterymarch and LMGAA, into QS Investors to capture synergies and leverage the best capabilities of each entity. In connection with the integration, total charges for restructuring and transition costs of $38,404 have been recognized through March 31, 2015, which includes $35,846 and $2,558 for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, primarily recorded in Compensation and benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). These costs are primarily comprised of charges for employee termination benefits, including severance and retention incentives, as well as real estate related charges. Any additional charges related to the integration are not expected to be material. The table below presents a summary of changes in the restructuring and transition-related liability from December 31, 2013 through March 31, 2015 and cumulative charges incurred to date: Balance as of December 31, 2013 Accrued charges Balance as of March 31, 2014 Accrued charges Payments Balance as of March 31, 2015 Non-cash charges(2) Year ended March 31, 2014 Year ended March 31, 2015 Total Cumulative charges incurred as of March 31, 2015 (1) Includes lease loss reserve of $6,760 for space permanently abandoned. (2) Includes stock-based compensation expense and accelerated fixed asset depreciation. Fauchier Partners Management, Limited Compensation Other Total $ $ $ $ $ – $ 2,161 2,161 22,897 (24,658) 400 – 1,659 1,659 26,717 $ $ $ $ – 111 111 9,720(1) (3,940) 5,891 286 1,570 1,856 11,687 $ $ $ $ $ – 2,272 2,272 32,617 (28,598) 6,291 286 3,229 3,515 38,404 On March 13, 2013, Permal acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Fauchier Partners Management, Limited (“Fauchier”), a European based manager of funds-of- hedge funds, from BNP Paribas Investment Partners, S.A. At the time of acquisition, Fauchier managed assets of approximately $5,400,000. The initial purchase price was a cash payment of $63,433, which was funded from existing cash resources. As of March 31, 2015, $22,276 (using the exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the maximum £15,000 payment amount) was due under the agreements governing the acquisition for the second anniversary contingent consideration payment, and 76 Legg Mason AR2015was paid in May 2015. In addition, contingent consideration of up to approximately $30,000 (using the exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the £20,000 maximum contract amount), may be due on or about the fourth anniversary of closing, dependent on achieving certain levels of revenue, net of distribution costs. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the related Contingent consideration liability was $27,117, $22,276 of which relates to the second anniversary payment and is included in current Contingent consideration in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, with the remainder included in non-current Contingent consideration in the consolidated Balance Sheet. The decrease of $2,436 from March 31, 2014, was attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion. Legg Mason has executed currency forwards to economically hedge the risk of movements in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British pound in which the estimated contingent liability payment amounts are denominated. See Note 14 for additional information regarding derivatives and hedging. A summary of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows: Purchase price Cash Contingent consideration Total Consideration Identifiable assets and liabilities Cash Receivables Amortizable intangible asset management contracts Indefinite-life intangible fund management contracts Other current liabilities, net Deferred tax liability Total identifiable assets and liabilities $ 63,433 21,566 84,999 8,156 12,174 2,865 65,126 (16,667) (15,638) 56,016 Goodwill $ 28,983 The fair value of the amortizable intangible asset management contracts is being amortized over a period of six years. These acquired intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for U.K. tax purposes. Management estimated the fair values of the indefinite- life intangible fund management contracts based upon discounted cash flow analyses, and the contingent consideration expected to be paid based upon probability- weighted revenue project ions, using unobservable market data inputs, which are Level 3 measurements. As is typical with the acquisition of a portion of a business from a larger financial services firm with other related operations, Legg Mason expected some initial contraction in the acquired business. The significant assumptions used in these analyses at acquisition included projected annual cash flows, revenues and discount rates, are summarized as follows: Projected Cash Flow Growth Rates (35)% to 11% (weighted- average — 6% ) Discount Rate 16.0% Indefinite-life intangible fund management contracts Projected Revenue Growth Rates Discount Rate Contingent consideration (16)% to 3% (weighted- 2.0% average — (5)%) The contingent consideration estimate was revised as of March 31, 2014, to consider the higher level of Fauchier performance fees through March 31, 2014 and included various scenarios with net revenue growth rates ranging from 0% to 8% (weighted-average 2%) and a discount rate of 2.7%. 77 Legg Mason AR2015The net unrealized and realized gain (loss) for investment securities classified as trading was $10,545, $22,963 and $18,260 for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. All available-for-sale investments were held by Legg Mason’s subsidiary LMIC. In connection with the previously discussed sale of LMIC, all of its related assets and liabilities were reclassified to assets held for sale effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, therefore, as of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason no longer held any available-for-sale investments. At March 31, 2014, available-for-sale investments consisted of mortgage backed securities, U.S. government and agency securities and equity securities. Gross unrealized gains and (losses) for investments classified as available-for-sale were $203 and $(451), respectively, as of March 31, 2014. For available-for-sale investments, Legg Mason used the specific identification method to determine the cost of a security sold and the amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings. The proceeds and gross realized gains and losses from sales and maturities of available-for-sale investments were as follows: Available-for-sale: Proceeds Gross realized gains Gross realized losses Years Ended March 31, 2014 2013 $ 4,306 $ 5,272 – (29) 22 (43) Legg Mason had no investments classified as held-to- maturity as of March 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company has not presented pro forma combined results of operations for this acquisition because the results of operations as reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) would not have been materially different. The financial results of Fauchier included in Legg Mason’s consolidated financial results for the year ended March 31, 2014, included revenues of $72,088, and did not have a material impact on Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Disposition Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust On November 7, 2014, Legg Mason completed the previously announced sale of all of its equity interests in Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company N.A. (“LMIC”) for proceeds of $47,000 to Stifel Financial Corporation’s Global Wealth Management segment. The sale did not have a material impact on Legg Mason’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. 3. Investments and Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities The disclosures below include details of Legg Mason’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value, excluding the financial assets and financial liabilities of CIVs. See Note 16 Variable Interest Entities and Consolidation of Investment Vehicles, for information related to the assets and liabilities of CIVs that are measured at fair value. Legg Mason has investments in debt and equity securities that are generally classified as trading as described in Note 1. Investments as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, are as follows: 2015 2014 Investment securities: Current investments $ 454,735 $ 467,726 Available-for-sale Other(1) Total – 77 12,072 90 $ 454,812 $ 479,888 (1) Includes investments in private equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. 78 Legg Mason AR2015The fair values of financial assets and (liabilities) of the Company were determined using the following categories of inputs: As of March 31, 2015 Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Total Assets: Cash equivalents:(1) Money market funds Time deposits and other Total cash equivalents Current investments: $ 353,265 $ – $ – 353,265 47,035 47,035 Trading investments relating to long-term incentive 80,529 – compensation plans(2) – – – – $ 353,265 47,035 400,300 80,529 Trading investments of proprietary fund products 269,647 88,201 186 358,034 and other trading investments(3) Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans, proprietary fund products and other investments(4)(5) 2,148 14,024 – 16,172 Total current investments 352,324 102,225 Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other(6) Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs(4)(6) Derivative assets(7) Other investments(6) Total Liabilities: Long-term debt(8) Contingent consideration liabilities(9) Derivative liabilities(7) Total – – 580 – – – 5,462 – 706,169 $ 154,722 – – (8,665) $ (255,462) – – $ $ 186 14,511 48,344 – 77 454,735 14,511 48,344 6,042 77 $ $ 63,118 $ 924,009 – $ (255,462) (110,784) (110,784) – (8,665) $ (8,665) $ (255,462) $ (110,784) $ (374,911) 79 Legg Mason AR2015As of March 31, 2014 Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Total Assets: Cash equivalents:(1) Money market funds Time deposits and other Total cash equivalents Current investments: $ 456,631 $ – $ – 456,631 106,226 106,226 Trading investments relating to long-term incentive 109,648 – compensation plans(2) – – – – $ 456,631 106,226 562,857 109,648 Trading investments of proprietary fund products 260,251 75,015 190 335,456 and other trading investments(3) Equity method investments relating to long-term incentive compensation plans, proprietary fund products and other investments(4)(5) Total current investments Available-for-sale investment securities(6) Investments in partnerships, LLCs and other(6) Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs(4)(6) Derivative assets(7) Other investments(6) Total Liabilities: Contingent consideration liability(9) Derivative liabilities(7) Total 8,497 14,125 – 22,622 378,396 2,048 – – 3,584 – $ 840,659 $ $ – (2,335) (2,335) $ $ $ 89,140 10,024 2,878 – – – 208,268 – – – 190 – 21,586 62,973 – 90 467,726 12,072 24,464 62,973 3,584 90 $ $ $ 84,839 $ 1,133,766 (29,553) – (29,553) $ $ (29,553) (2,335) (31,888) (1) Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Cash investments in actively traded money market funds are measured at NAV and are classified as Level 1. Cash investments in time deposits and other are measured at amortized cost, which approximates fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization, and are classified as Level 2. (2) Primarily mutual funds where there is minimal market risk to the Company as any change in value is primarily offset by an adjustment to compensation expense and related deferred compensation liability. (3) Trading investments of proprietary fund products and other trading investments consist of approximately 63% and 37% in equity and debt securities, respectively, as of March 31, 2015, and approximately 53% and 47% in equity and debt securities, respectively, as of March 31, 2014. (4) Substantially all of Legg Mason’s equity method investments are investment companies which record their underlying investments at fair value. Fair value is measured using Legg Mason’s share of the investee’s underlying net income or loss, which is predominately representative of fair value adjustments in the investments held by the equity method investee. (5) Includes investments under the equity method (which approximate fair value) relating to long-term incentive compensation plans of $8,728 and $14,125 as of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, and proprietary fund products and other investments of $7,444 and $8,497 as of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, which are classified as Investment securities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (6) Amounts are included in Other non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for each of the periods presented. (7) See Note 14. (8) Long-term debt amount is the sum of the amortized cost of long-term debt and the fair value of an interest rate swap contract designated as a fair value hedge. See Note 6. (9) See Note 2. 80 Legg Mason AR2015Proprietary fund products include seed capital investments made by Legg Mason to fund new investment strategies and products. Legg Mason had investments in proprietary fund products, which totaled $392,039 and $405,918, as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which are substantially comprised of investments in 52 funds and 46 funds, respectively, that are individually greater than $1,000, with minimal third-party investment, and together comprise over 90% of the total seed capital investments in each period. See Notes 1 and 16 for information regarding the determination of whether investments in proprietary fund products represent VIEs and consolidation. Substantially all of the above financial instruments where valuation methods rely on other than observable market inputs as a significant input utilize the equity method, the cost method, or NAV practical expedient discussed below, such that measurement uncertainty has little relevance. The changes in financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, are presented in the tables below: Value as of March 31, 2014 Purchases Sales Redemptions/ Settlements/ Other Transfers Realized and unrealized gains/ (losses), net Value as of March 31, 2015 Assets: Trading investments of $ 190 $ 2 $ (27) $ – $ – $ 21 $ 186 proprietary fund products and other trading investments Investments in partnerships, 21,586 – (24) LLCs and other Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs 62,973 2,048 (14,101) (5,108) (1,121) Other investments 90 – – – – – – (1,943) 14,511 (1,455) 48,344 (13) 77 $ 84,839 $ 2,050 $ (14,152) $ (6,229) $ – $ (3,390) $ 63,118 Liabilities: Contingent consideration liabilities $ (29,553) $ (88,581) $ – $ – $ – $ 7,350 $ (110,784) Value as of March 31, 2013 Purchases Sales Redemptions/ Settlements/ Other Transfers Realized and unrealized gains/ (losses), net Value as of March 31, 2014 Assets: Trading investments of $ 246 $ 1 $ – $ (77) $ – $ 20 $ 190 proprietary fund products and other trading investments Investments in partnerships, 27,762 – (731) (4,869) LLCs and other Equity method investments in partnerships and LLCs 66,338 5,154 (750) (9,258) Other investments 111 – (12) – – – – (576) 21,586 1,489 62,973 (9) 90 $ 94,457 $ 5,155 $ (1,493) $ (14,204) $ – $ 924 $ 84,839 Liabilities: Contingent consideration liability $ (21,900) $ – $ – $ – $ – $ (7,653) $ (29,553) 81 Legg Mason AR2015Realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for Level 3 investments are primarily included in Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The change in unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 investments and liabilities still held at the reporting date was $2,439 and $(5,210) for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. As a practical expedient, Legg Mason relies on the NAV of certain investments as their fair value. The NAVs that have been provided by the investees have been derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the respective reporting dates. The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, the nature of these investments and any related liquidation restrictions or other factors which may impact the ultimate value realized: Category of Investment Funds-of-hedge funds Hedge funds Private equity funds Other Total Investment Strategy Global macro, fixed income, long/short equity, natural resources, systematic, emerging market, European hedge Fixed income — developed market, event driven, fixed income — hedge, relative value arbitrage, European hedge Long/short equity Fair Value Determined Using NAV As of March 31, 2015 March 31, 2015 $ 23,787(1) $ March 31, 2014 34,771(1) Unfunded Commitments Remaining Term $ n/a n/a 14,515 19,461 20,000 n/a 23,563(2) 22,759(2) 9,654 Up to 9 years Various 1,129 2,434 n/a Various(3) $ 62,994(4) $ 79,425(4) $ 29,654 n/a — not applicable (1) Liquidation restrictions: 9% monthly redemption and 91% quarterly redemption as of March 31, 2015. 40% monthly redemption and 60% quarterly redemption as of March 31, 2014. (2) Liquidations are expected over the remaining term. (3) Of this balance, 21% has a remaining term of less than one year and 79% has a remaining term of 18 years. (4) Comprised of 38% and 62% of Level 2 and Level 3 assets, respectively, as of March 31, 2015 and 31% and 69% of Level 2 and Level 3 assets, respectively, as of March 31, 2014. There are no current plans to sell any of these investments held as of March 31, 2015. Depreciation and amortization expense related to fixed assets was $52,461, $50,531, and $73,829 for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. This includes accelerated depreciation and amortization of $1,265 in fiscal 2015 primarily arising from the integration over time of Batterymarch into QS Investors, $2,542 in 2014, primarily arising from various corporate initiatives, and $21,020 in fiscal 2013, arising from an initiative to reduce space requirements. 4. Fixed Assets The following table reflects the components of fixed assets as of: Equipment Software Leasehold improvements Total cost 2015 2014 $ 152,893 $ 147,663 269,745 203,420 626,058 249,368 209,747 606,778 (417,537) Less: accumulated depreciation (446,452) and amortization Fixed assets, net $ 179,606 $ 189,241 82 Legg Mason AR20155. Intangible Assets and Goodwill Goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are not amortized, and the values of other identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, unless the assets are determined to have indefinite useful lives. Goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are analyzed to determine if the fair value of the assets exceeds the book value. Intangible assets subject to amortization are considered for impairment at each reporting period. If the fair value is less than the book value, Legg Mason will record an impairment charge. The following table reflects the components of intangible assets as of: March 31, 2015 March 31, 2014 Amortizable intangible asset management contracts Cost $ 188,312 $ 207,224 Accumulated amortization (166,583) (197,255) Net 21,729 9,969 Legg Mason completed its annual impairment testing process of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets and determined that there was no impairment in the value of these assets as of December 31, 2014. As a result of uncertainty regarding future market conditions and economic results, assessing the fair value of the reporting unit and intangible assets requires management to exercise significant judgment. The current assessed fair value of the indefinite-life funds-of-hedge funds contracts asset related to the Permal and Fauchier acquisitions exceeds the combined carrying values by 13%. Should market performance, flows, or related AUM levels decrease in the near term, or other factors change, such that cash flow projections deviate from current projections, it is reasonably possible that the assets could be deemed to be impaired by a material amount. The current assessed fair value of the indefinite-life domestic mutual funds contracts asset related to the Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”) acquisition exceeds the carrying value by 41%. Legg Mason also determined that no triggering events occurred as of March 31, 2015 that would require further impairment testing. Indefinite-life intangible assets U.S. domestic mutual fund management contracts Permal/Fauchier funds-of-hedge fund management contracts 2,106,351 2,106,351 698,104 698,104 As of March 31, 2015, amortizable intangible asset management contracts are being amortized over a weighted-average remaining life of 9.3 years. Other fund management contracts(1) 427,816 304,549 Trade names(1) 59,334 52,800 3,291,605 3,161,804 Intangible assets, net $ 3,313,334 $ 3,171,773 (1) As of March 31, 2015, Other fund management contracts and Trade names include $124,002 and $6,524, respectively, related to the acquisition of Martin Currie. In connection with the previously discussed sale of LMIC, amortizable intangible asset management contracts with a cost of $36,864 and accumulated amortization of $30,205 were sold on November 7, 2014. Also, the acquisitions of Martin Currie and QS Investors included amortizable asset management contracts of $15,234 and $7,060, respectively. The acquisition of Martin Currie also included an indefinite-life trade name with a value of $7,130. See Note 2 for additional information on the acquisitions and disposition. Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total $ 2,710 2,710 2,710 2,710 2,227 8,662 $ 21,729 83 Legg Mason AR2015The change in the carrying value of goodwill is summarized below: Balance as of March 31, 2013 Impact of excess tax basis amortization Changes in foreign exchange rates and other Balance as of March 31, 2014 Impact of excess tax basis amortization Gross Book Value Accumulated Impairment Net Book Value $ 2,431,065 $ (1,161,900) $ 1,269,165 (21,675) (6,967) – – (21,675) (6,967) $ 2,402,423 $ (1,161,900) $ 1,240,523 (21,742) – – – (21,742) 165,927 (45,198) Business acquisitions, net of $(9,271) relating to the sale of LMIC (See Note 2) 165,927 Changes in foreign exchange rates and other (45,198) Balance as of March 31, 2015 $ 2,501,410 $ (1,161,900) $ 1,339,510 Legg Mason recognizes the tax benefit of the amortization of excess tax benefit related to the CAM acquisition. In accordance with accounting guidance for income taxes, the tax benefit is recorded as a reduction of goodwill and deferred tax liabilities as the benefit is realized. 6. Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt The disclosures below include details of Legg Mason’s debt, excluding the debt of CIVs. See Note 16, Variable Interest Entities and Consolidation of Investment Vehicles, for information related to the debt of CIVs. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, Legg Mason had $750,000 of revolving credit facility capacity. Pursuant to a capital plan, in June 2012, Legg Mason entered into an unsecured credit agreement which provided for a $500,000 revolving credit facility and a $500,000 term loan, which was repaid in fiscal 2014, as further discussed below. The proceeds of the term loan were used to repay the $500,000 of outstanding borrowings under the previous revolving credit facility, which was then terminated. In January 2014, Legg Mason entered into a $250,000 incremental borrowing credit facility, which was contemplated in, and is in addition to the $500,000 revolving credit facility. Both revolving credit facilities expire in June 2017. The revolving credit facilities have interest rates of LIBOR plus 150 basis points and annual commitment fees of 20 basis points. The interest rates may change in the future based on changes in Legg Mason’s credit ratings. These revolving credit facilities are available for capital needs and for general corporate purposes. There were no borrowings outstanding under either of these facilities as of March 31, 2015 and 2014. The revolving credit facilities have standard financial covenants, including a maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the documents) of 2.5 to 1 and minimum EBITDA to interest ratio (as defined in the documents) of 4.0 to 1. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason’s net debt to EBITDA ratio was 1.3 to 1 and EBITDA to interest expense ratio was 13.5 to 1, and therefore, Legg Mason has maintained compliance with the applicable covenants. 84 Legg Mason AR2015Long-term debt consists of the following: March 31, 2015 March 31, 2014 Carrying Value Fair Value Hedge Adjustment Unamortized Discount (Premium) Maturity Amount Carrying Value 5.5% Senior Notes $ – $ – $ – $ – $ 645,042 2.7% Senior Notes due July 2019 3.95% Senior Notes due July 2024 5.625% Senior Notes due January 2044 Other term loans Subtotal 254,993 249,577 553,519 – (5,462) – – – 469 423 (3,519) – 250,000 250,000 550,000 – – – 393,784 438 1,058,089 (5,462) (2,627) 1,050,000 1,039,264 Less: current portion – – – – 438 Total $ 1,058,089 $ (5,462) $ (2,627) $ 1,050,000 $ 1,038,826 In May 2012, Legg Mason announced a capital plan that included refinancing the Company’s then outstanding 2.5% convertible notes (the “Convertible Notes”). The refinancing was effected through the issuance of $650,000 of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.5% Senior Notes”), the net proceeds of which, together with cash on hand and $250,000 of remaining borrowing capacity under a then existing revolving credit facility, were used to repurchase all $1,250,000 of the Convertible Notes. The terms of the repurchase included the repayment of the Convertible Notes at par plus accrued interest, a prepayment fee of $6,250 and a non-cash exchange of warrants to the holders of the Convertible Notes that replicated and extended the contingent conversion feature of the Convertible Notes. The cash payment of $1,256,250 to repurchase the Convertible Notes was allocated between their liability and equity components based on a liability fair value of $1,193,971, determined using a then current market interest rate of 4.1%, resulting in a loss on debt extinguishment of $68,975, including $7,851 of accelerated deferred issue costs. The remaining balance of the cash payment was allocated to the equity component of the Convertible Notes for a $62,279 reduction of additional paid-in capital, offset by related tax benefits of $31,446. The $1,193,971 amount of cash repurchase payment allocated to the liability component of the Convertible Notes upon their extinguishment exceeded the initial allocated value at issuance of $977,933, requiring the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended March 31, 2013 to include an allocation of the $216,038 excess to operating activities. The warrants issued to the holders of the Convertible Notes in connection with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes provide for the purchase, in the aggregate and subject to adjustment, of 14,205 shares of our common stock, on a net share settled basis, at an exercise price of $88 per share. The warrants expire in July 2017 and can be settled, at the Company’s election, in either shares of common stock or cash. Accordingly, the warrants are accounted for as equity. In connection with the extinguishment of the Convertible Notes, hedge transactions (purchased call options and warrants) executed in connection with the initial issuance of the Convertible Notes were also terminated. The $650,000 of 5.5% Senior Notes, were sold at a discount of $6,754, which was being amortized to interest expense over the seven-year term, prior to the redemption of the 5.5% Senior Notes in July 2014, as further discussed below. The 5.5% Senior Notes could be redeemed at any time prior to their scheduled maturity, in part or in aggregate, at the greater of the related principal amount at that time or the sum of the remaining scheduled payments discounted at the Treasury rate (as defined) plus 0.5%, together with any related accrued and unpaid interest. In January 2014, Legg Mason issued $400,000 of 5.625% Senior Notes due January 2044, the net proceeds of which, together with cash on hand, were used to repay the $450,000 of outstanding borrowings under the five-year term loan entered into in conjunction with the unsecured credit agreement noted above. The 5.625% Senior Notes were sold at a discount of $6,260, which is being amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term. 85 Legg Mason AR2015In June 2014, Legg Mason issued $250,000 of 2.7% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”), $250,000 of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), and an additional $150,000 of the existing 5.625% Senior Notes due 2044 (the “2044 Notes” and, together with the 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes, the “Notes”). In July 2014, the Company used $658,769 in proceeds from the sale of the Notes, net of related fees, together with cash on hand, to call the outstanding $650,000 of 5.5% Senior Notes and pay a related make-whole premium of $98,418, as discussed below. On June 23, 2014, Legg Mason entered into a reverse treasury rate lock contract with a financial intermediary with a notional amount of $650,000, which was designated as a cash flow hedge. The contract was issued in connection with the retirement of the 5.5% Senior Notes. The Company entered into the reverse treasury rate lock agreement in order to hedge the variability in the retirement payment on the entire principal amount of debt. The reverse treasury rate lock contract effectively fixed the present value of the forecasted debt make-whole payment which was priced on July 18, 2014, to eliminate risk associated with changes in the five-year U.S. treasury yield. The 5.5% Senior Notes were retired on July 23, 2014, and resulted in a pre-tax, non-operating charge of $107,074, consisting of a make-whole premium of $98,418 to call the 5.5% Senior Notes, net of $638 from the settlement of the reverse treasury lock before related administrative fees, and $8,656 associated with existing deferred charges and original issue discount. 2.7% Senior Notes due July 2019 The $250,000 2019 Notes were sold at a discount of $553, which is being amortized to interest expense over the five- year term. The 2019 Notes can be redeemed at any time prior to the scheduled maturity in part or in aggregate, at the greater of the related principal amount at that time or the sum of the remaining scheduled payments discounted at the treasury rate (as defined) plus 0.20%, together with any related accrued and unpaid interest. On June 23, 2014, Legg Mason entered into an interest rate swap contract with a financial intermediary with a notional amount of $250,000, which was designated as a fair value hedge. The interest rate swap is being used to effectively convert the 2019 Notes from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt and has identical terms as the underlying debt being hedged, so no ineffectiveness is expected. The swap has a five-year term, and matures on July 15, 2019. The fair value of the contract at March 31, 2015, was a derivative asset of $5,462, which is classified as Other assets with a corresponding fair value adjustment recorded as Other income (gain on hedging activity) in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended March 31, 2015. The carrying value of the debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is likewise increased by $5,462 with a corresponding fair value adjustment recorded as Other expense (loss on hedging activity) in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended March 31, 2015. The related hedging gains and losses offset one another for no net income or loss impact. The swap payment dates coincide with the debt payment dates on July 15 and January 15. The related receipts/payments by Legg Mason are recorded as Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Since the original terms and conditions of the hedged instruments are unchanged, the swap continues to be an effective fair value hedge. 3.95% Senior Notes due July 2024 The $250,000 2024 Notes were sold at a discount of $458, which is being amortized to interest expense over the 10-year term. The 2024 Notes can be redeemed at any time prior to the scheduled maturity in part or in aggregate, at the greater of the related principal amount at that time or the sum of the remaining scheduled payments discounted at the treasury rate (as defined) plus 0.25%, together with any related accrued and unpaid interest. 5.625% Senior Notes due January 2044 As previously discussed, in January 2014, Legg Mason issued $400,000 of 5.625% Senior Notes. An additional $150,000 of 2044 Notes were issued in June 2014 and were sold at a premium of $9,779, which is also being amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term. All of the 2044 Notes can be redeemed at any time prior to their scheduled maturity in part or in aggregate, at the greater of the related principal amount at that time or the sum of the remaining scheduled payments discounted at the treasury rate (as defined) plus 0.30%, together with any related accrued and unpaid interest. As of March 31, 2015, $250,000 of long-term debt matures in fiscal 2020, and $800,000 matures thereafter. At March 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of long-term debt was approximately $1,166,697, including $255,462 for the 2019 Notes which are carried at an amount that approximates fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The debt fair value was estimated using publicly quoted market prices and was classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. 86 Legg Mason AR20157. Income Taxes The components of income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) are as follows: Domestic Foreign Total The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows: Federal Foreign State and local Total income tax provision (benefit) Current Deferred Total income tax provision (benefit) 2015 249,380 118,613 367,993 $ $ 2014 2013 $ $ 320,890 $ (264,342) 98,751 (246,265) 419,641 $ (510,607) 2015 2014 2013 $ 95,499 $ 125,494 $ (74,185) 20,365 9,420 125,284 24,897 100,387 125,284 $ $ $ (1,450) 13,761 (85,677) 9,003 $ $ $ 137,805 $ (150,859) 19,375 $ 6,496 118,430 (157,355) 137,805 $ (150,859) A reconciliation of the difference between the effective income tax (benefit) rate and the statutory federal income tax (benefit) rate is as follows: Tax provision (benefit) at statutory U.S. federal income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% (35.0)% 2015 2014 2013 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit(1) Effect of foreign tax rates(1) Changes in U.K. tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests Other, net(1) Effective income tax (benefit) rate 1.5 (4.9) – (0.5) 2.9 2.0 (4.2) (4.6) 0.3 4.3 1.5 3.8 (3.5) 0.5 3.2 34.0% 32.8% (29.5)% (1) State income taxes include changes in related valuation allowances, net of the impact on deferred tax assets of changes in state apportionment factors and planning strategies. The effect of foreign tax rates also includes changes in related valuation allowances. Other includes changes in federal valuation allowances and permanent tax adjustments. See schedule below for the change in valuation allowances by jurisdiction. In July 2012, The U.K. Finance Act 2012 was enacted, which reduced the main U.K. corporate tax rate from 25% to 24% effective April 1, 2012 and 23% effective April 1, 2013. In July 2013, the Finance Bill 2013 was enacted, further reducing the main U.K. corporate tax rate to 21% effective April 1, 2014 and 20% effective April 1, 2015. The reductions in the U.K. corporate tax rate resulted in tax benefits of $19,164 and $18,075, recognized in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, as a result of the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new rates. 87 Legg Mason AR2015Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. A summary of Legg Mason’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: Deferred Tax Assets Accrued compensation and benefits Accrued expenses Operating loss carryforwards Capital loss carryforwards Foreign tax credit carryforward Federal benefit of uncertain tax positions Mutual fund launch costs Martin Currie defined benefit pension liability Other Deferred tax assets Valuation allowance 2015 2014 $ 158,369 $ 154,074 60,282 290,765 5,335 247,027 18,461 30,968 7,741 3,817 822,765 (96,687) 61,575 267,940 10,015 235,661 16,914 31,774 – 303 778,256 (90,832) Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance $ 726,078 $ 687,424 Deferred Tax Liabilities Basis differences, principally for intangible assets and goodwill Depreciation and amortization Net unrealized gains from investments Other Deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) 2015 2014 $ 82,636 $ 72,596 666,057 523,595 7,832 78 4,743 221 756,603 601,155 $ (30,525) $ 86,269 Certain tax benefits associated with Legg Mason’s employee stock plans are recorded directly in Stockholders’ Equity. No tax benefit was recorded to equity in fiscal 2015, 2014 or 2013, due to the net operating loss position of the Company. As of March 31, 2015, an aggregate $15,444 of tax benefit will be recognized as an increase in Stockholders’ Equity when the related net operating losses are ultimately realized. Legg Mason has various loss and tax credit carryforwards that may provide future tax benefits. Related valuation allowances are established in accordance with accounting guidance for income taxes, if it is management’s opinion that it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized. To the extent the analysis of the realization of deferred tax assets relies on deferred tax liabilities, Legg Mason has considered the timing, nature, and jurisdiction of reversals, as well as, future increases relating to the tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets. Substantially all of Legg Mason’s deferred tax assets relate to U.S. federal, state and U.K. taxing jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2015, U.S. federal deferred tax assets aggregated $702,233, realization of which is expected to require approximately $3,500,000 of future U.S. earnings. Based on estimates of future taxable income, using assumptions consistent with those used in Legg Mason’s goodwill impairment testing, it is more likely than not that substantially all of the current federal tax benefits relating to net operating losses are realizable. With respect to deferred tax assets relating to foreign tax credit carryforwards, it is more likely than not that tax benefits relating to the utilization of approximately $40,000 of foreign taxes as credits will not be realized and a valuation allowance was established in a prior period. Except as it relates to Martin Currie’s deferred tax assets discussed below, no additional federal valuation allowance was established in fiscal 2015. In addition, a valuation allowance was established in prior years for a 88 Legg Mason AR2015substantial portion of our deferred tax assets relating to U.K. and other foreign taxing jurisdictions. While tax planning may enhance Legg Mason’s tax positions, the realization of tax benefits on deferred tax assets for which valuation allowances have not been provided is not dependent on implementation of any significant tax strategies. As of March 31, 2015, U.S. state deferred tax assets aggregated approximately $186,944. Due to limitations on utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and taking into consideration certain state tax planning strategies, a valuation allowance of $34,600 was established in prior years for state net operating loss benefits generated in certain jurisdictions in cases where it is not more likely than not that these benefits will ultimately be realized. A valuation allowance of $9,359 was released in fiscal 2015 due to updated forecasts, state law changes, and planned implementation of various tax planning strategies. Due to the uncertainty of future state apportionment factors and future effective state tax rates, the value of state net operating loss benefits ultimately realized may vary. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has a valuation allowance of $18,441 for the deferred tax assets related to Martin Currie entities. Of this amount, approximately $17,000 was established as a purchase accounting adjustment recorded upon acquisition based on historical and current net operating losses of Martin Currie. The following deferred tax assets and valuation allowances relating to carryforwards have been recorded at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 2015 2014 Expires Beginning After Fiscal Year Deferred Tax Assets U.S. federal net operating losses U.S. federal capital losses U.S. federal foreign tax credits U.S. charitable contributions U.S. state net operating losses(1)(2) U.S. state capital losses Foreign net operating losses Foreign capital losses Total deferred tax assets for carryforwards Valuation Allowances U.S. federal net operating losses U.S. federal capital losses U.S. federal foreign tax credits U.S. state net operating losses U.S. state capital losses Foreign net operating losses Foreign capital losses Valuation allowances for carryforwards Foreign other deferred assets Total valuation allowances 2031 n/a 2015 2020 2016 2016 2027 n/a $ 96,774 $ 80,515 – 247,027 233 168,069 44 25,877 5,290 543,314 1,282 – 25,429 26,828 44 23,504 5,290 82,377 14,310 96,687 $ $ $ $ $ 3,545 235,661 – 168,173 532 19,252 5,938 513,616 – 74 25,947 34,590 129 15,738 5,938 82,416 8,416 $ 90,832 (1) Substantially all of the U.S. state net operating losses carryforward through fiscal 2029. (2) Due to potential for change in the factors relating to apportionment of income to various states, Legg Mason’s effective state tax rates are subject to fluctuation which will impact the value of the Company’s deferred tax assets, including net operating losses, and could have a material impact on the future effective tax rate of the Company. 89 Legg Mason AR2015Legg Mason had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $92,344, $77,892 and $72,650 as of March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Of these totals, approximately $62,775, $51,518 and $46,340, respectively, (net of the federal benefit for state tax liabilities) are the amounts of unrecognized benefits which, if recognized, would favorably impact future income tax provisions and effective tax rates. During fiscal 2015, as a result of the net impact of effective settlement of tax examinations, previously unrecognized benefits of $6,719 were realized. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized gross tax benefits for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, is as follows: Balance, beginning of year Additions based on tax positions related to the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for tax positions of prior years Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities Expiration of statutes of limitations Balance, end of year 2015 2014 2013 $ 77,892 $ 72,650 $ 90,831 9,919 13,054 – 5,659 12,610 (138) (8,521) (12,889) – – 11,726 8,439 (13,083) (25,205) (58) $ 92,344 $ 77,892 $ 72,650 Although management cannot predict with any degree of certainty the timing of ultimate resolution of matters under review by various taxing jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next 12 months by up to $17,000 as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations and the completion of tax authorities examinations. On April 13, 2015, reforms to New York City’s corporate tax structure were enacted which included changes in the calculation of net operating loss carryforwards and changes in the way sales revenue is sourced. Legg Mason currently estimates that the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities under the new rules will result in the recognition of a one-time income tax benefit of approximately $10,000 to $20,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company accrues interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and recognizes penalties in other operating expense. During the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized approximately $1,492, $(580), and $5,500, respectively, which was substantially all interest. At March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason had approximately $8,570, $7,300, and $14,000, respectively, accrued for interest and penalties on tax contingencies in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Legg Mason’s prior year tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, Brazilian and other tax authorities in various other countries and states. The following tax years remain open to income tax examination for each of the more significant jurisdictions where Legg Mason is subject to income taxes: after fiscal 2009 for U.S. federal; after fiscal 2013 for the U.K.; after calendar year 2006 for Brazil; after fiscal 2009 for the state of California; after fiscal 2008 for the state of New York; and after fiscal 2010 for the states of Connecticut, Maryland and Massachusetts. The Company does not anticipate making any significant cash payments with the settlement of these audits in excess of amounts that have been reserved. Except as noted below, Legg Mason intends to permanently reinvest overseas substantially all of the cumulative undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Accordingly, no additional U.S. federal income taxes have been provided for undistributed earnings to the extent that they are permanently reinvested in Legg Mason’s foreign operations. It is not practical at this time to determine the income tax liability that would result upon repatriation of additional accumulated foreign earnings. In order to increase the amount of cash available in the U.S. for general corporate purposes, Legg Mason plans to utilize up to $257,000 of foreign cash over the next several years, of which only $16,000 is accumulated foreign earnings. Due to certain tax planning strategies, Legg Mason anticipates that it will generate a tax benefit of approximately $12,000 with respect to this repatriation and adjusted the tax reserve accordingly in fiscal 2014. No further repatriation of accumulated prior period foreign earnings is currently planned. However, if circumstances change, Legg Mason will provide for and pay any applicable additional U.S. taxes in connection 90 Legg Mason AR2015with repatriation of offshore funds. It is not practical at this time to determine the income tax liability that would result from any further repatriation of accumulated foreign earnings. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason had available domestically cash and cash equivalents of approximately $400,000 and a $750,000 undrawn credit facility to meet domestic liquidity needs and to provide flexibility in maximizing cost effective capital deployment without repatriating additional accumulated foreign earnings. 8. Commitments and Contingencies Legg Mason leases office facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases, and also has multi-year agreements for certain services. These leases and service agreements expire on varying dates through fiscal 2028. Certain leases provide for renewal options and contain escalation clauses providing for increased rentals based upon maintenance, utility and tax increases. As of March 31, 2015, the minimum annual aggregate rentals under operating leases and service agreements are as follows: The minimum rental commitments shown above include $5,176 for commitments related to space that has been vacated, but for which subleases are being pursued. The related lease reserve liability, also included in the table below, was $2,213 and $19,330 as of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, and remains subject to adjustment based on circumstances in the real estate markets that may require a change in assumptions or the actual terms of a sublease that is ultimately secured. The lease reserve liability takes into consideration various assumptions, including the expected amount of time it will take to secure a sublease agreement and prevailing rental rates in the applicable real estate markets. The lease reserve liability for subleased space and vacated space for which subleases are being pursued is included in Other current liabilities and Other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The table below presents a summary of the changes in the lease reserve liability: Balance as of March 31, 2012 $ 44,763 Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space(1) 39,080 Payments, net Adjustments and other $ 134,034 Balance as of March 31, 2013 (15,341) (1,590) $ 66,912 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total 112,593 97,711 81,557 75,188 291,070 $ 792,153 The minimum rental commitments shown above have not been reduced by $162,826 for minimum sublease rentals to be received in the future under non-cancelable subleases, of which approximately 35% is due from one counterparty. The lease reserve liability, which is included in the table below, for space subleased as of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 was $43,726 and $36,170, respectively. If a sub-tenant defaults on a sublease, Legg Mason may incur operating charges to adjust the existing lease reserve liability to reflect expected future sublease rentals at reduced amounts, as a result of the then current commercial real estate market. The above minimum rental commitments include $703,481 in real estate and equipment leases and $88,672 in service and maintenance agreements. Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space(1) 7,371 Payments, net Adjustments and other Balance as of March 31, 2014 (17,117) (1,666) $ 55,500 Accrued charges for vacated and subleased space(1) 9,023 Payments, net Adjustments and other Balance as of March 31, 2015 (15,001) (3,583) $ 45,939 (1) Included in Occupancy expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The following table reflects rental expense under all operating leases and servicing agreements: 2015 2014 2013 Rental expense $ 136,414 $ 130,880 $ 138,488 Less: sublease income 19,672 16,289 14,750 Net rent expense $ 116,742 $ 114,591 $ 123,738 91 Legg Mason AR2015Legg Mason recognizes rent expense ratably over the lease period based upon the aggregate lease payments. The lease period is determined as the original lease term without renewals, unless and until the exercise of lease renewal options is reasonably assured, and also includes any periods provided by the landlord as a “free rent” period. Aggregate lease payments include all rental payments specified in the contract, including contractual rent increases, and are reduced by any lease incentives received from the landlord, including those used for tenant improvements. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason had commitments to invest approximately $34,261 in limited partnerships that make private investments. These commitments are expected to be outstanding, or funded as required, through the end of their respective investment periods ranging through fiscal 2021. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason had various commitments to pay contingent consideration relating to business acquisitions, the fair value of which aggregates $110,784, of which $22,276 is a current liability. These commitments are further described below. In connection with the acquisition of Martin Currie in October 2014, as further discussed in Note 2, contingent consideration payments may be due March 31 following the first, second and third anniversaries of closing, aggregating up to approximately $483,000 (using the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the maximum £325,000 contract amount), inclusive of the payment of certain potential pension and other obligations, and dependent on the achievement of certain financial metrics, as specified in the share purchase agreement, at March 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $75,211 (using the foreign exchange rate as of October 1, 2014). Actual payments to be made will also include amounts for certain potential pension and other obligations that are accounted for separately. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the Contingent consideration liability was $70,114, a decrease of $5,097 from October 1, 2014, substantially all of which is attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion. In connection with the acquisition of QS Investors in May 2014, as further discussed in Note 2, contingent consideration of up to approximately $10,000 and approximately $20,000 for the second and fourth anniver- sary payments may be due in July 2016 and July 2018, respectively, dependent on the achievement of certain net revenue targets, and subject to a potential catch-up adjustment in the fourth anniversary payment for any second anniversary payment shortfall. The Contingent consideration liability established at closing had an acquisition date fair value of $13,370, which represented the present value of the contingent consideration expected to be paid, and has accreted to $13,553 as of March 31, 2015. In connection with the acquisition of Fauchier in March 2013, as further discussed in Note 2, contingent consideration of $22,276 (using the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2015, for the maximum £15,000 payment amount) was due as of March 31, 2015, for the second anniversary contingent consideration payment, and was paid in May 2015. In addition, up to approximately $30,000 (using the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 for the £20,000 maximum contractual amount), may be due on or about the fourth anniversary of closing, which is dependent upon the achievement of certain levels of revenue, net of distribution costs. The fair value of the Contingent consideration liability was $27,117 as of March 31, 2015, $22,276 of which relates to the second anniversary payment. The decrease of $2,436 from March 31, 2014, was attributable to changes in the exchange rate, net of accretion. Legg Mason has executed currency forwards to economically hedge the risk of movements in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the British pound in which the estimated contingent liability payment amounts are denominated. See Note 14 for additional information regarding derivatives and hedging. In the normal course of business, Legg Mason enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide general indemnifications, which are not considered financial guarantees by relevant accounting guidance. Legg Mason’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against Legg Mason that have not yet occurred. Legg Mason has been the subject of customer complaints and has also been named as a defendant in various legal actions arising primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities, including certain class actions, which primarily allege violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. In the normal course of its business, Legg Mason has also received subpoenas and is currently involved in governmental and industry self-regulatory agency inquiries, investigations and, from time to time, proceedings involving asset management activities. In accordance with guidance for accounting for contingencies, Legg Mason has established provisions for estimated losses from pending complaints, legal actions, investigations and proceedings when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and a reasonable estimate of loss can be made. 92 Legg Mason AR2015Legg Mason cannot estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss associated with matters of litigation and other proceedings, including those described above as customer complaints, legal actions, inquiries, proceedings and investigations. The inability to provide a reasonably possible amount or range of losses is not because there is uncertainty as to the ultimate outcome of a matter, but because liability and damage issues have not developed to the point where Legg Mason can conclude that there is both a reasonable possibility of a loss and a meaningful amount or range of possible losses. There are numerous aspects to customer complaints, legal actions, inquiries, proceedings and investigations that prevent Legg Mason from estimating a related amount or range of reasonably possible losses. These aspects include, among other things, the nature of the matters; that significant relevant facts are not known, are uncertain or are in dispute; and that damages sought are not specified, are uncertain, unsupportable or unexplained. In addition, for legal actions, discovery may not yet have started, may not be complete or may not be conclusive, and meaningful settlement discussions may not have occurred. Further, for regulatory matters, investigations may run their course without any clear indication of wrongdoing or fault until their conclusion. In management’s opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of March 31, 2015, to provide for any probable losses that may arise from matters for which the Company could reasonably estimate an amount. Legg Mason’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected during a period in which a matter is ultimately resolved. In addition, the ultimate costs of litigation-related charges can vary significantly from period-to-period, depending on factors such as market conditions, the size and volume of customer complaints and claims, including class action suits, and recoveries from indemnification, contribution, insurance reimbursement, or reductions in compensation under revenue share arrangements. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, Legg Mason’s liability for losses and contingencies was $200 and $500, respectively. During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason had charges relating to litigation and other proceedings of approximately $200, $200, and $5,200, respectively (net of recoveries of $19,300 and $15,200 in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively). 9. Employee Benefits Legg Mason, through its subsidiaries, maintains various defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees. Through these plans, Legg Mason can make two types of discretionary contributions. One is a profit sharing contribution to eligible plan participants based on a percentage of qualified compensation and the other is a match of employee 401(k) contributions. Matches range from 50% to 100% of employee 401(k) contributions, up to a maximum of the lesser of up to 6% of employee compensation or a specified amount up to $16 per year. Corporate profit sharing and matching contributions, together with contributions made under subsidiary plans, totaled $27,888, $29,355 and $25,868 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, employees can make voluntary contributions under certain plans. In connection with the acquisition of Martin Currie on October 1, 2014, Legg Mason assumed the obligations of Martin Currie’s defined benefit pension plan, more fully discussed in Note 2. 10. Capital Stock At March 31, 2015, the authorized numbers of common and preferred shares were 500,000 and 4,000, respectively. At March 31, 2015 and 2014, there were 8,815 and 10,333 shares of common stock, respectively, reserved for issuance under Legg Mason’s equity plans. In May 2012, Legg Mason’s Board of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional purchases of Legg Mason common stock, $13,515 of which remained as of March 31, 2015. In January 2015, Legg Mason’s Board of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional purchases of Legg Mason common stock, which is in addition to the $13,515 remaining under the prior authorized share repurchase program. There is no expiration date attached to either authorization. During fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, Legg Mason purchased and retired 6,931, 9,677, and 16,199 shares of its common stock, respectively, for $356,522, $359,996, and $425,475, respectively, through open market purchases. As discussed in Note 6, warrants issued in connection with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes could result in the issuance of a maximum of 14,205 shares of Legg Mason common stock, subject to adjustment, if certain conditions are met. 93 Legg Mason AR2015Changes in common stock for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are as follows: Common Stock Beginning balance Shares issued for: Stock option exercises and other stock-based compensation Deferred compensation employee stock trust Deferred compensation, net Shares repurchased and retired Employee tax withholding by settlement of net share transactions Ending balance Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 117,173 125,341 139,874 749 44 907 (6,931) (473) 839 50 1,175 (9,677) (555) 80 71 1,925 (16,199) (410) 111,469 117,173 125,341 Dividends declared per share were $0.64, $0.52 and $0.44 for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Dividends declared but not paid at March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were $17,837, $14,945 and $14,185, respectively, and are included in Other current liabilities of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 11. Stock-based Compensation Legg Mason’s stock-based compensation includes stock options, an employee stock purchase plan, market-based performance shares payable in common stock, restricted stock awards and units, affiliate management equity plans and deferred compensation payable in stock. Effective July 26, 2011, the number of shares authorized to be issued under Legg Mason’s active equity incentive stock plan was 41,500. Remaining shares available for issuance under the active equity incentive stock plan as of March 31, 2015, were 8,267. Options under Legg Mason’s employee stock plans have been granted at prices not less than 100% of the fair market value. Options are generally exercisable in equal increments over four or five years and expire within eight to ten years from the date of grant. As further discussed below, the components of our total stock-based compensation expense for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 were as follows: Stock options Restricted stock and restricted stock units Employee stock purchase plan Affiliate management equity plans Non-employee directors Performance share units Employee stock trust Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 2013 $ 11,584 $ 13,530 $ 45,975 48,263 673 5,206 1,550 1,056 201 315 2,270 1,950 – 160 10,979 46,351 238 – 1,250 – 165 Total stock-based compensation expense $ 66,245 $ 66,488 $ 58,983 94 Legg Mason AR2015Stock Options Compensation expense relating to stock options for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $11,584, $13,530, and $10,979 respectively. The related income tax benefit for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $4,681, $5,244, and $4,293, respectively. Stock option transactions under Legg Mason’s equity incentive plans during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 are summarized below: Options outstanding at March 31, 2012 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Options outstanding at March 31, 2013 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Options outstanding at March 31, 2014 Granted Exercised Canceled/forfeited Options outstanding at March 31, 2015 Number of Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share 5,624 966 (25) (1,204) 5,361 1,215 (804) (971) 4,801 918 (694) (593) 4,432 $57.78 23.72 21.80 51.87 $53.13 33.64 30.52 97.49 $43.02 47.65 30.75 90.31 $39.58 The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, was $14,351, $6,064, and $168, respectively. At March 31, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $85,351. The following information summarizes Legg Mason’s stock options outstanding at March 31, 2015: Exercise Price Range $ 14.81–$ 25.00 25.01–35.00 35.01–94.00 94.01–122.93 Option Shares Outstanding Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share Weighted-Average Remaining Life (in years) 710 1,873 1,495 354 4,432 $22.80 31.91 42.67 100.77 4.73 4.26 6.73 0.31 95 Legg Mason AR2015At March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, options were exercisable for 2,202, 2,531, and 3,254 shares, respectively, and the weighted-average exercise prices were $41.50, $54.04, and $69.07, respectively. Stock options exercisable at March 31, 2015, have a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 3.3 years. At March 31, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable shares was $46,303. The weighted-average fair value of service-based stock option grants during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, excluding those granted to our Chief Executive Officer in May 2013 discussed below, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $12.03, $12.13, and $9.47 per share, respectively. The following summarizes Legg Mason’s stock options exercisable at March 31, 2015: Exercise Price Range $ 14.81–$ 25.00 25.01–35.00 35.01–94.00 94.01–122.93 Option Shares Exercisable Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share 332 1,398 118 354 2,202 $21.76 31.70 35.16 100.77 The following information summarizes unvested stock options under Legg Mason’s equity incentive plans for the year ended March 31, 2015: Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Shares unvested at March 31, 2014 2,270 $11.58 Granted Vested Canceled/forfeited 918 (888) (70) 12.03 11.62 11.86 Shares unvested at March 31, 2015 2,230 $11.73 Unamortized compensation cost related to unvested options at March 31, 2015, was $15,371 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. Cash received from exercises of stock options under Legg Mason’s equity incentive plans was $22,069, $23,818, and $660 for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The tax benefit expected to be realized for the tax deductions from these option exercises totaled $4,856, $1,815, and $45 for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the model for grants in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013: Years Ended March 31, 2015 2014 Expected dividend yield Risk-free interest rate 1.04% 1.51% 1.54% 0.80% 2013 1.44% 0.81% Expected volatility 29.53% 45.08% 51.80% Expected life (in years) 4.94 4.93 5.02 Legg Mason uses an equally weighted combination of both implied and historical volatility to measure expected volatility for calculating Black-Scholes option values. In May 2013, Legg Mason awarded options to purchase 500 shares of Legg Mason, Inc. common stock at an exercise price of $31.46, equal to the then current market value of Legg Mason’s common stock, to its Chief Executive Officer, which are included in the outstanding options table above. The award had a grant date fair value of $5,525 and is subject to vesting requirements, 25% of which vests over a two-year service period; 25% of which vests over a two-year service period and is subject to Legg Mason’s common stock price equaling or exceeding $36.46 for 20 consecutive trading days; 25% of which was subject to Legg Mason’s common stock price equaling or exceeding $41.46 for 20 consecutive trading days; and 25% of which was subject to Legg Mason’s common stock price equaling or exceeding $46.46 for 20 consecutive trading days; as well as a requirement that certain shares received upon exercise are retained for a two-year period. In each of January and June 2014, 25% (50% in aggregate) of this award vested when the Legg Mason stock price met and exceeded $41.46 and $46.46, respectively, for 20 consecutive trading days. The weighted-average fair value per share for these awards of $11.05 was estimated as of the grant date using a grant price of $31.46, and a Monte Carlo option pricing model with the following assumptions: Expected dividend yield Risk-free interest rate Expected volatility 1.48% 0.86% 44.05% 96 Legg Mason AR2015Restricted Stock Other Restricted stock and restricted stock unit transactions during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, are summarized below: Number of Shares Weighted- Average Grant Date Value Unvested shares at March 31, 2012 Granted Vested Canceled/forfeited Unvested shares at March 31, 2013 Granted Vested Canceled/forfeited Unvested shares at March 31, 2014 Granted Vested Canceled/forfeited 2,873 2,185 (1,177) (143) 3,738 1,369 (1,622) (151) 3,334 1,236 (1,330) (190) Unvested shares at March 31, 2015 3,050 $33.83 24.04 31.22 58.30 $27.99 35.66 28.66 29.04 $30.77 48.03 30.92 35.95 $37.38 The restricted stock and restricted stock units were non-cash transactions. For the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, Legg Mason recognized $45,975, $48,263, and $46,351, respectively, in compensation expense and related tax benefits of $18,246, $18,575, and $17,697, respectively, for restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. Unamortized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards for 3,050 shares not yet recognized at March 31, 2015, was $70,478 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. In connection with the change in Legg Mason’s Chief Executive Officer in September 2012, 325 shares of restricted stock were granted to certain executives and key employees, with an aggregate value of $8,400. In March 2013, the vesting of 85 of these shares was accelerated in connection with the termination of the recipients’ employment. The remaining shares vested on March 31, 2014. Compensation expense for the year ended March 31, 2013, includes approximately $6,400 of accelerated stock-based net compensation costs associated with the departure of Legg Mason executive officers during fiscal 2013, of which $1,400 relates to the accelerated vesting of shares in March 2013. Legg Mason has a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan covering substantially all U.S. employees. Shares of common stock are purchased in the open market on behalf of participating employees, subject to a 4,500 total share limit under the plan. Purchases are made through payroll deductions and Legg Mason provides a 15% contribution towards purchases, which is charged to earnings. Legg Mason’s contribution increased from 10% to 15% in January 2014. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 107, 85, and 107 shares, respectively, have been purchased in the open market on behalf of participating employees. In fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason recognized $673, $315, and $238, respectively, in compensation expense related to the stock purchase plan. On June 28, 2013, Legg Mason implemented a management equity plan and granted units to key employees of Permal that entitle them to participate in 15% of the future growth of the Permal enterprise value (subject to appropriate discounts), if any, subsequent to the grant date. On March 31, 2014, a similar management equity plan was implemented by Legg Mason with a grant to certain key employees of ClearBridge. Independent valuations determined the aggregate cost of the awards to be approximately $9,000 and $16,000 for Permal and ClearBridge, respectively, which will be recognized as Compensation and benefits expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the related vesting periods, through December 2017 and March 2019, respectively. Both arrangements provide that one-half of the respective cost will be absorbed by the affiliates’ incentive pool. Total compensation expense related to affiliate management equity plans was $5,206 and $2,270 for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of March 31, 2015, the redemption amount of vested units under both plans, as if they were currently redeemable, aggregated approximately $10,000. Legg Mason also has an equity plan for non-employee directors. Under the current equity plan, directors may elect to receive shares of stock or restricted stock units. Prior to a July 19, 2007 amendment to the Plan, directors could also elect to receive stock options. Options granted under the old plan are immediately exercisable at a price equal to the market value of the shares on the date of grant and have a term of not more than ten years. In fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, Legg Mason recognized expense of $1,550, $1,950, and $1,250, respectively, for awards under this plan. Shares, options, and restricted stock units issuable under this equity plan are limited to 625 in aggregate, of which 359 shares 97 Legg Mason AR2015were issued as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, non-employee directors held no stock options, and as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, non-employee directors held 32 and 112 stock options, respectively, which are included in the outstanding options table. During the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, non-employee directors did not exercise any stock options. During the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, there were 32 and 26 stock options canceled or forfeited from the current equity plan for non-employee directors, respectively, and during the year ended March 31, 2013, there were no stock options canceled or forfeited from the current equity plan. For the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 54 and 72 stock options canceled or forfeited, respectively, related to an equity plan for non-employee directors which was discontinued in July 2005. As of March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, non-employee directors held 45, 64, and 91 restricted stock units, respectively, which vest on the grant date and are, therefore, not included in the unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units in the table above. During the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, non-employee directors were granted 8, 12, and 17 restricted stock units, respectively, and 23, 47, and 35 shares of common stock, respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2015, and 2014, there were 27 and 39 restricted stock units distributed, respectively, and during the year ended March 31, 2013, there were no restricted stock units distributed. In May 2014, Legg Mason granted certain executive officers a total of 78 performance share units as part of their fiscal 2014 incentive award with an aggregate value of $3,457. The vesting of performance share units and the number of shares payable at vesting, are determined based on Legg Mason’s relative total stockholder return over a three-year period ending April 30, 2017. Compensation expense relating to the performance units for the year ended March 31, 2015 was $1,056. The grant date fair value per unit for these awards of $44.11 was estimated as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: Expected dividend yield Risk-free interest rate Expected volatility 1.33% 0.75% 30.81% During fiscal 2012, Legg Mason established a long-term incentive plan (the “LTIP”) under its equity incentive plan, which provided an additional element of compensation that is based on performance, determined as the achievement of a pre-defined amount of Legg Mason’s cumulative adjusted earnings per share over the respective performance periods. Under the LTIP, executive officers were granted cash value performance units in the quarter ended June 2011 and the quarter ended September 2012 for target amounts up to $1,850 in each period. Awards granted under the LTIP that vest may be settled in cash and/or shares of Legg Mason common stock, at the discretion of Legg Mason. The September 2012 grant performance period ended on March 31, 2015, and resulted in a payment amount of $1,000 to be settled in cash by June 15, 2015. The June 2011 grant performance period ended March 31, 2014, and no cash and/or shares were due. Deferred compensation payable in shares of Legg Mason common stock has been granted to certain employees in an elective plan. The vesting in the plan is immediate and the plan provides for discounts of up to 10% on contributions and dividends. Effective January 1, 2015, there will be no additional contributions to the plan, with the remaining 283 shares reserved for future dividend distributions. In fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason recognized $201, $160, and $165, respectively, in compensation expense related to this plan. During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason issued 44, 51, and 71 shares, respectively, under the plan with a weighted-average fair value per share at the grant date of $45.83, $31.90, and $23.07, respectively. The undistributed shares issued under this plan are held in a rabbi trust. Assets of the rabbi trust are consolidated with those of the employer, and the value of the employer’s stock held in the rabbi trust is classified in stockholders’ equity and accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock. Therefore, the shares Legg Mason has issued to the rabbi trust and the corresponding liability related to the deferred compensation plan are presented as components of stockholders’ equity as Employee stock trust and Deferred compensation employee stock trust, respectively. Shares held by the trust at March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were 660, 672 and 726, respectively. 98 Legg Mason AR201512. Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. shareholders (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. (adjusted by earnings allocated to participating securities) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Legg Mason issues to employees restricted stock that are deemed to be participating securities prior to their vesting, because the unvested restricted shares entitle their holder to nonforfeitable dividend rights. In this circumstance, accounting guidance requires a “two-class method” for EPS calculations that excludes earnings (both distributed and undistributed) allocated to participating securities. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS, but adjusts for the effect of potential common shares unless they are antidilutive. For periods with a net loss, potential common shares other than potentially unvested restricted shares, are considered antidilutive. In May 2012, Legg Mason’s Board of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional purchases of Legg Mason common stock, $13,515 of which remained as of March 31, 2015. In January 2015, Legg Mason’s Board of Directors authorized $1,000,000 for additional purchases of Legg Mason common stock, which is in addition to the $13,515 remaining under the prior authorization. There is no expiration date attached to either share repurchase authorization. During the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, Legg Mason repurchased and retired 6,931, 9,677, and 16,199 shares of its common stock, respectively, for $356,522, $359,996, and $425,475, respectively, through open market purchases. The par value of the shares repurchased is charged to common stock, with the excess of the purchase price over par first charged against additional paid-in capital, with the remaining balance, if any, charged against retained earnings. The following table presents the computations of basic and diluted EPS: Basic weighted-average shares for EPS Potential common shares: Dilutive employee stock options Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for EPS Years Ended March 31, 2015 112,019 2014 2013 121,941 133,226 1,227 442 – 113,246 122,383 133,226 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 237,080 $ 284,784 $ (353,327) Less: Earnings (distributed and undistributed) allocated to participating securities 6,340 – – Net income (loss) (distributed and undistributed) allocated to shareholders $ 230,740 $ 284,784 $ (353,327) (excluding participating securities) Net Income (Loss) per share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders Basic Diluted $ $ 2.06 2.04 $ $ 2.34 2.33 $ $ (2.65) (2.65) The weighted-average shares for the year ended March 31, 2015, excludes 3,065 of weighted-average unvested restricted shares deemed to be participating securities. The exclusion of weighted-average unvested restricted shares deemed to be participating securities and any allocation of earnings to participating securities would not materially impact the calculation of basic or diluted earnings per share in either fiscal 2014 or 2013. The diluted EPS calculations for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, exclude any potential common shares issuable under the 14,205 warrants issued in connection with the repurchase of the Convertible Notes in May 2012 because the market price of Legg Mason common stock did not exceed the exercise price, and therefore, the warrants would be antidilutive. Options to purchase 1,319 and 2,620 shares for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the presumed proceeds from exercising such options, including the related income tax benefits, exceed the average price of the common shares for the period and therefore, the options are deemed antidilutive. Further, market- and performance-based awards are excluded from potential dilution until the designated market or performance condition is met. The diluted EPS calculation for the year ended March 31, 2013, excludes 5,730 potential common shares that are antidilutive due to the net loss for the fiscal year. Unvested restricted shares for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were antidilutive and therefore do not further impact diluted EPS. 99 Legg Mason AR201513. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Accumulated other comprehensive income includes cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and net of tax, gains and losses on investment securities. The change in the accumulated translation adjustments for fiscal 2015 and 2014, primarily resulted from the impact of changes in the British pound, Brazilian real, the Australian dollar, and the Japanese yen, in relation to the U.S. dollar on the net assets of Legg Mason’s subsidiaries in the U.K., Brazil, Australia, and Japan, for which the pound, the real, the Australian dollar, and the yen, are the functional currencies, respectively. A summary of Legg Mason’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, is as follows: Foreign currency translation adjustment $ (51,147) $ 37,835 2015 2014 Unrealized gains on investment securities, net of tax provision of $76 in fiscal 2014 – 114 Net actuarial losses on defined (9,595) – benefit pension plan Total $ (60,742) $ 37,949 There were no significant amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 or 2013, except for $405, net of income tax provision of $233, realized on the termination of a reverse treasury rate lock contract, in the year ended March 31, 2015 as further described in Note 6. 14. Derivatives and Hedging The disclosures below detail Legg Mason’s derivatives and hedging activities excluding the derivatives and hedging activities of CIVs. See Note 16, Variable Interest Entities and Consolidation of Investment Vehicles, for information related to the derivatives and hedging of CIVs. Legg Mason uses currency forwards to economically hedge the risk of movements in exchange rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar, British pound, Japanese yen, Australian dollar, euro, Chinese yuan, Indian rupee, Indonesian rupiah, Malaysian ringgit, Philippine peso, Chilean peso, and South Korean won. All derivative transactions for which Legg Mason has certain legally enforceable rights of setoff are governed by International Swaps and Derivative Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements. For these derivative transactions, we have one ISDA Master Agreement with each of the significant counterparties, which cover our transactions with that counterparty. Each of the respective ISDA agreements provide for settlement netting and close-out netting between Legg Mason and that counterparty, which are legally enforceable rights to setoff. Other assets and Other liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2015, were $6,042 and $8,665, respectively. Net Other assets from these activities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as March 31, 2014 was $1,249. Legg Mason also uses market hedges on certain seed capital investments by entering into futures contracts to sell index funds that benchmark the hedged seed capital investments. Open futures contracts required cash collateral of $8,343 and $12,985 as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. With the exception of the reverse treasury rate lock contract and interest rate swap contract discussed in Note 6, Legg Mason has not designated any derivatives as hedging instruments for accounting purposes during the periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason had open currency forward contracts and open futures and forwards contracts relating to seed capital investments with aggregate notional values totaling $165,291 and $162,965, respectively. As of March 31, 2015, the weighted-average remaining contract terms for currency forward contracts and futures and forward contracts relating to seed capital investments were four months and three months, respectively. 100 Legg Mason AR2015The following table presents the derivative assets and related offsets, if any, as of March 31, 2015: Gross amounts not offset in the Balance Sheet Gross amounts of recognized assets Gross amounts offset in the Balance Sheet Net amount of derivative assets presented in the Balance Sheet Financial instruments Cash collateral Derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments (See Note 6) Interest rate swap $ – $ – $ – $ 5,462 $ Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments Currency forward contracts Futures and forward contracts relating to seed capital investments Total derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments 781 75 856 (259) (17) (276) 522 58 580 – – – Total derivative instruments $ 856 $ (276) $ 580 $ 5,462 $ – – – – – The following table presents the derivative liabilities and related offsets, if any, as of March 31, 2015: Net amount as of March 31, 2015 $ 5,462 522 58 580 $ 6,042 Gross amounts not offset in the Balance Sheet Gross amounts of recognized liabilities Gross amounts offset in the Balance Sheet Net amount of derivative liabilities presented in the Balance Sheet Financial instruments Cash collateral Net amount as of March 31, 2015 Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments Currency forward contracts $ (8,623) $ 2,327 $ (6,296) $ – $ – $ (6,296) Futures and forward contracts relating to seed capital investments Total derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments – – – (2,369) 8,343 5,974 $ (8,623) $ 2,327 $ (6,296) $ (2,369) $ 8,343 $ (322) The following table presents the fair values as of March 31, 2014, of derivative instruments, classified as Other assets and Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments Currency forward contracts Futures and forward contracts relating to seed capital investments Total derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments 2014 Assets Liabilities $ $ 3,271 313 3,584 $ $ (825) (1,510) (2,335) 101 Legg Mason AR2015The following tables present gains (losses) recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) on derivative instruments. As described above, the currency forward contracts and futures and forward contracts for seed capital investments included below are economic hedges of interest rate and market risk of certain operating and investing activities of Legg Mason, including foreign exchange risk on acquisition contingent consideration. Gains and losses on these derivative instruments substantially offset gains and losses of the economically hedged items. Income Statement Classification 2015 2014 2013 Gains Losses Gains Losses Gains Losses Years Ended March 31, Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Currency forward contracts for: Operating activities Other expense $ 5,150 $ (16,518) $ 7,098 $ (2,617) $ 3,650 $ (1,858) Seed capital investments Futures and forward contracts relating to seed capital investments Other non-operating income (expense) Other non-operating income (expense) Total gain (loss) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments 2,491 (259) 56 (1,719) 1,090 (380) 10,801 (15,413) 2,471 (19,403) 1,914 (5,597) 18,442 (32,190) 9,625 (23,739) 6,654 (7,835) Derivatives designated as hedging instruments (See Note 6) Interest rate swap Reverse treasury rate lock Total Interest expense Other non-operating income (expense) 5,462 638 – – – – – – – – – – $ 24,542 $ (32,190) $ 9,625 $ (23,739) $ 6,654 $ (7,835) 15. Business Segment Information Legg Mason is a global asset management company that provides investment management and related services to a wide array of clients. The company operates in one reportable business segment, Global Asset Management. Global Asset Management provides investment advisory services to institutional and individual clients and to company-sponsored investment funds. The primary sources of revenue in Global Asset Management are investment advisory, distribution and administrative fees, which typically are calculated as a percentage of AUM and vary based upon factors such as the type of underlying investment product and the type of services that are provided. In addition, performance fees may be earned under certain investment advisory contracts for exceeding performance benchmarks. Revenues by geographic location are primarily based on the geographic location of the advisor or the domicile of fund families managed by Legg Mason. The table below reflects our revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region as of March 31: Operating Revenues United States United Kingdom Other International Total Intangible Assets, Net and Goodwill United States United Kingdom Other International Total 102 2015 2014 2013 $ 1,977,975 $ 1,874,328 $ 1,800,539 398,729 442,402 436,542 430,887 387,966 424,145 $ 2,819,106 $ 2,741,757 $ 2,612,650 $ 3,135,226 $ 3,127,654 $ 3,139,050 1,062,332 455,286 879,946 404,696 895,767 411,910 $ 4,652,844 $ 4,412,296 $ 4,446,727 Legg Mason AR201516. Variable Interest Entities and Consolidated Investment Vehicles As further discussed in Notes 1 and 3, in accordance with financial accounting standards, Legg Mason consolidates certain sponsored investment vehicles, some of which are designated as CIVs. As of March 31, 2015, Legg Mason concluded it was the primary beneficiary of one sponsored investment fund VIE, which was consolidated (and designated a CIV) as of March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, despite significant third party investments in this product. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, Legg Mason also concluded it was the primary beneficiary of 17 employee- owned funds it sponsors, which were consolidated and reported as CIVs. Legg Mason also held a longer-term controlling financial interest in one sponsored investment fund VRE, which has third-party investors and was consolidated and included as a CIV as of March 31, 2014, and 2013. In January 2015, Legg Mason redeemed a significant portion of its investment in this fund and as a result no longer had a controlling financial interest in the fund, therefore, the fund was not included as a CIV as of March 31, 2015. In addition, as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, Legg Mason concluded it was the primary beneficiary of one of three CLOs in which it had a variable interest. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the balances related to this CLO were consolidated and reported as a CIV in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, this CLO substantially liquidated and therefore it was not consolidated by Legg Mason as of, or subsequent to, June 30, 2014. Legg Mason’s investment in CIVs, as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, was $15,553 and $39,434, respectively, including VREs of $19,659 as of March 31, 2014, which represents its maximum risk of loss, excluding uncollected advisory fees. The assets of these CIVs are primarily comprised of investment securities. Investors and creditors of these CIVs have no recourse to the general credit or assets of Legg Mason beyond its investment in these funds. The following tables reflect the impact of CIVs in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and, 2013, respectively: Consolidating Balance Sheets March 31, 2015 March 31, 2014 Balance Before Consolidation of CIVs CIVs Eliminations Consolidated Totals Balance Before Consolidation of CIVs CIVs Eliminations Consolidated Totals Current Assets $ 1,880,689 $ 56,929 $ (15,583) $ 1,922,035 $ 2,032,827 $ 138,745 $ (42,981) $ 2,128,591 Non-current assets 5,151,942 – – 5,151,942 4,950,948 31,810 – 4,982,758 Total Assets $ 7,032,631 $ 56,929 $ (15,583) $ 7,073,977 $ 6,983,775 $ 170,555 $ (42,981) $ 7,111,349 Current Liabilities $ 808,640 $ 6,436 $ (30) $ 815,046 $ 735,737 $ 89,055 $ (3,547) $ 821,245 Non-current liabilities 1,728,510 Total Liabilities Redeemable Non- controlling interests 2,537,150 10,787 – 6,436 27,581 – 1,728,510 1,520,236 (30) 2,543,556 2,255,973 7,152 45,520 3,172 – 89,055 26,325 – 1,520,236 (3,547) 2,341,481 15,647 45,144 Total Stockholders’ 4,484,694 22,912 (22,705) 4,484,901 4,724,630 55,175 (55,081) 4,724,724 Equity Total Liabilities and Equity $ 7,032,631 $ 56,929 $ (15,583) $ 7,073,977 $ 6,983,775 $ 170,555 $ (42,981) $ 7,111,349 103 Legg Mason AR2015Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss) Total Operating Revenues Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Total Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Income Before Income Tax Provision Income tax provision Net Income Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests Year Ended March 31, 2015 Balance Before Consolidation of CIVs CIVs Eliminations Consolidated Totals $ 2,819,827 $ – $ (721) $ 2,819,106 2,320,709 499,118 (136,186) 362,932 125,284 237,648 568 906 (906) 5,883 4,977 – 4,977 (728) 2,320,887 7 77 84 – 84 498,219 (130,226) 367,993 125,284 242,709 5,629 – 5,061 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 237,080 $ 4,977 $ (4,977) $ 237,080 Total Operating Revenues Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Total Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Income Before Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Income tax provision Net Income (Loss) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Year Ended March 31, 2014 Balance Before Consolidation of CIVs CIVs Eliminations Consolidated Totals $ 2,743,707 $ – $ (1,950) $ 2,741,757 2,310,444 433,263 (10,333) 422,930 137,805 285,125 341 2,376 (2,376) 2,445 69 – 69 – (1,956) 2,310,864 6 430,893 (3,364) (3,358) – (3,358) (3,289) (11,252) 419,641 137,805 281,836 (2,948) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 284,784 $ 69 $ (69) $ 284,784 Total Operating Revenues Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Total Other Non-Operating Expense Income Before Income Tax Benefit Income tax benefit Net Loss Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Year Ended March 31, 2013 Balance Before Consolidation of CIVs CIVs Eliminations Consolidated Totals $ 2,615,047 $ – $ (2,397) $ 2,612,650 3,046,587 (431,540) (72,177) (503,717) (150,859) (352,858) 469 2,965 (2,965) (2,864) (5,829) – (5,829) – (2,403) 3,047,149 6 (434,499) (1,067) (1,061) – (1,061) (6,890) (76,108) (510,607) (150,859) (359,748) (6,421) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ (353,327) $ (5,829) $ 5,829 $ (353,327) Other non-operating income (expense) includes interest income, interest expense and net gains (losses) on investments and long-term debt of CIVs determined on an accrual basis. The consolidation of CIVs has no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. 104 Legg Mason AR2015The fair value of the financial assets and (liabilities) of CIVs were determined using the following categories of inputs as of March 31, 2015 and 2014: Assets: Trading investments: Hedge funds Proprietary funds Total trading investments Assets: Trading investments: Hedge funds Proprietary funds Total trading investments Investments: Private equity funds Liabilities: CLO debt Derivative liabilities Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Value as of March 31, 2015 $ $ 1,108 28,387 29,495 $ $ 4,412 – 4,412 $ $ 14,093 – 14,093 $ $ 19,613 28,387 48,000 Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Value as of March 31, 2014 $ $ $ $ 1,110 $ 3,941 $ 17,888 $ 27,524 28,634 – 28,634 – – – $ $ $ – 3,941 – 3,941 – (1,888) (1,888) $ $ $ – 17,888 31,810 49,698 (79,179) – (79,179) $ $ $ 22,939 27,524 50,463 31,810 82,273 (79,179) (1,888) (81,067) Except for the CLO debt, substantially all of the above financial instruments where valuation methods rely on other than observable market inputs as a significant input utilize the NAV practical expedient, such that measurement uncertainty has little relevance. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the CLO substantially liquidated and was not consolidated as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2014, the carrying value of the CLO debt approximated the amount to be paid to investors, and there was no appreciable measurement uncertainty. 105 Legg Mason AR2015The changes in assets and (liabilities) of CIVs measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, are presented in the tables below: Value as of March 31, 2014 Purchases Sales Settlements/ Other Transfers Realized and unrealized gains/ (losses), net Value as of March 31, 2015 17,888 $ 2,580 $ (5,761) $ – $ 78 $ (692) $ 14,093 31,810 4,727 (3,124) (34,042) – 629 – 49,698 $ 7,307 $ (8,885) $ (34,042) $ 78 $ (63) $ 14,093 Assets: Hedge funds Private equity funds Liabilities: CLO debt $ $ $ (79,179) $ – $ – $ 79,179 $ – Total realized and unrealized gains (losses), net Value as of March 31, 2013 Purchases Sales Settlements/ Other Transfers $ $ – $ (63) – Realized and unrealized gains/(losses), net Value as of March 31, 2014 Assets: Hedge funds Private equity funds Liabilities: CLO debt $ $ $ 19,448 $ 3,516 $ (8,037) $ 26,982 1,811 – 46,430 $ 5,327 $ (8,037) $ – – – $ $ (207,835) $ – $ – $ 133,047 $ Total realized and unrealized gains (losses), net – – – – $ $ $ $ 2,961 $ 3,017 17,888 31,810 5,978 $ 49,698 (4,391) $ (79,179) 1,587 Realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for Level 3 assets and liabilities of CIVs are included in Other non- operating income (expense) of CIVs in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Total unrealized losses for Level 3 investments and liabilities of CIVs relating only to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date were $79 and $2,284 for the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during either of the years ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The NAVs used as a practical expedient by CIVs have been provided by the investees and have been derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the respective reporting dates. The following table summarizes, as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, the nature of these investments and any related liquidation restrictions or other factors, which may impact the ultimate value realized: Category of Investment Hedge funds Investment Strategy Global macro, fixed income, long/short equity, systematic, emerging market, U.S. and European hedge Private equity funds Long/short equity Total Fair Value Determined Using NAV As of March 31, 2015 March 31, 2015 March 31, 2014 Unfunded Commitments Remaining Term $ $ 19,613(1) $ 22,939(2) n/a –(3) 19,613 $ 31,810 54,749 n/a n/a n/a n/a — not applicable (1) Redemption restrictions: 8% daily redemption; 5% monthly redemption; 3% quarterly redemption; and 84% are subject to three to five year lock-up or side pocket provisions. (2) Redemption restrictions: 10% daily redemption; 6% monthly redemption; 2% quarterly redemption; and 82% are subject to three to five year lock-up or side pocket provisions. (3) Fund was no longer consolidated as of March 31, 2015. 106 Legg Mason AR2015There are no current plans to sell any of these investments held as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2014, Legg Mason elected the fair value option for certain eligible assets and liabilities, including corporate loans and debt, of the consolidated CLO. Management believed that the use of the fair value option mitigated the impact of certain timing differences and better matched the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities related to the CLO. Legg Mason did not elect the fair value option for any assets or liabilities as of March 31, 2015, as the CLO was no longer consolidated. The following table presents the fair value and unpaid principal balance of CLO debt carried at fair value under the fair value option as of March 31, 2014: Principal amounts outstanding Excess unpaid principal over fair value Fair value March 31, 2014 $ $ 92,114 (12,935) 79,179 During the year ended March 31, 2014, total net losses of $5,914, were recognized in Other non-operating income (losses) of CIVs, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) related to assets and liabilities for which the fair value option was elected. CLO loans and CLO debt measured at fair value have floating interest rates, therefore, substantially all of the estimated gains and losses included in earnings for the year ended March 31, 2014, were attributable to instrument specific credit risk. As of March 31, 2015, there were no derivative liabilities of CIVs. Total derivative liabilities of CIVs of $1,888 as of March 31, 2014, are recorded in Other liabilities of CIVs. Gains and (losses) of $1,311 and $(1,537), respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2014, related to derivative liabilities of CIVs are included in Other non-operating income (loss) of CIVs. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, for VIEs in which Legg Mason holds a variable interest or is the sponsor and holds a variable interest, but for which it was not the primary beneficiary, Legg Mason’s carrying value and maximum risk of loss were as follows: CLOs Real Estate Investment Trust Other sponsored investment funds Total As of March 31, 2015 As of March 31, 2014 Equity Interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1) Maximum Risk of Loss(2) Equity Interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1) Maximum Risk of Loss(2) $ $ – $ 1,146 $ – $ 13,026 21,983 18,096 34,463 1,442 34,126 35,009 $ 53,705 $ 35,568 $ 911 3,715 78,521 83,147 (1) Includes $27,463 and $23,404 related to investments in proprietary funds products as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. (2) Includes equity investments the Company has made or is required to make and any earned but uncollected management fees. The Company’s total AUM of unconsolidated VIEs was $19,527,670 and $16,032,764 as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The assets of these VIEs are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, and the liabilities are primarily comprised of debt and various expense accruals. These VIEs are not consolidated because either (1) Legg Mason does not have the power to direct significant economic activities of the entity and rights/ obligations associated with benefits/losses that could be significant to the entity, or (2) Legg Mason does not absorb a majority of each VIE’s expected losses or does not receive a majority of each VIE’s expected residual gains. 107 Legg Mason AR2015QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted) (Unaudited) Fiscal 2015(1) Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Operating Income Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Income before Income Tax Provision Income tax provision Net Income Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 82,959 Net Income per share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders: Basic Diluted Cash dividend declared per share Stock price range: High Low Assets Under Management (in millions): End of period Average (1) Due to rounding of quarterly results, total amounts for fiscal year may differ immaterially from the annual results. As of May 19, 2015, the closing price of Legg Mason’s common stock was $54.30. Fiscal 2014(1) Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Operating Income Other Non-Operating Income (Expense) Income before Income Tax Provision Income tax provision Net Income Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Net Income Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. $ 68,947 Net Income per share Attributable to Legg Mason, Inc. Shareholders: Quarter Ended Mar. 31 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 June 30 $ 702,346 $ 718,984 $ 703,895 $ 693,881 573,396 128,950 (2,115) 126,835 42,807 84,028 1,069 $ 0.73 0.73 0.16 59.19 52.16 599,616 119,368 573,540 130,355 (1,303) (121,530) $ $ 118,065 38,017 80,048 3,012 77,036 0.67 0.67 0.16 57.15 45.78 $ $ $ $ 8,825 3,804 5,021 124 4,897 0.04 0.04 0.16 52.00 45.68 574,335 119,546 (5,278) 114,268 40,656 73,612 1,424 72,188 0.62 0.61 0.16 51.80 43.25 $ 702,724 $ 709,086 $ 707,834 $ 704,295 707,143 710,948 704,148 691,337 Quarter Ended Mar. 31 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 June 30 $ 681,396 $ 720,092 $ 669,852 $ 670,417 562,055 119,341 (7,393) 111,948 46,856 65,092 (3,855) $ 0.58 0.58 0.13 49.50 39.60 598,440 121,652 4,303 125,955 46,004 79,951 (1,783) 81,734 0.68 0.67 0.13 44.09 32.44 $ $ 563,486 106,366 485 106,851 19,153 87,698 1,410 86,288 0.70 0.70 0.13 35.85 30.28 586,883 83,534 (8,647) 74,887 25,792 49,095 1,280 47,815 0.38 0.38 0.13 37.04 29.28 $ $ $ $ $ 701,774 $ 679,475 $ 656,023 $ 644,511 689,003 670,019 650,428 654,737 Basic Diluted Cash dividend declared per share Stock price range: High Low Assets Under Management (in millions): End of period Average (1) Due to rounding of quarterly results, total amounts for fiscal year may differ immaterially from the annual results. 108 Legg Mason AR2015Corporate Data Executive Officers Joseph A. Sullivan Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Peter H. Nachtwey Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Thomas K. Hoops Executive Vice President & Head of Business Development Terence A. Johnson Executive Vice President & Head of Global Distribution Thomas C. Merchant Executive Vice President & General Counsel Ursula A. Schliessler Executive Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer Executive Offices 100 International Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 539-0000 www.leggmason.com Form 10-K Legg Mason’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and containing audited financial statements, is available upon request without charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the Executive Offices of the Company. Copies can also be obtained by accessing our website at www.leggmason.com Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 783-7600 www.pwc.com Transfer Agent American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219 (212) 936-5100 www.amstock.com Common Stock Shares of Legg Mason, Inc. common stock are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: LM). As of March 31, 2015, there were approximately 1,300 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock. leggmason.com youtube.com/leggmason linkedin.com/company/legg-mason @leggmason 100% From well- managed forests C000000
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above