Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Medical - Care Facilities / LHC Group

LHC Group

lhcg · NASDAQ Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker lhcg
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Healthcare
Industry Medical - Care Facilities
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · LHC Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
L E A D I N G  T H E   C H A N G E

05759-Cvr-R1.indd  2

4/10/18  12:56 PM

OUR PUR POSE 

It’s all about helping people. 

OUR MISSION 

We provide exceptional care and unparalleled service 

to patients and families who have placed their trust in us. 

OUR VISION 

We will improve the quality of life in the United States 

by transforming the delivery of healthcare services.

05759-Cvr-R1.indd  3

4/10/18  12:56 PM

 
 
OUR PUR POSE 

It’s all about helping people. 

OUR MISSION 

We provide exceptional care and unparalleled service 

to patients and families who have placed their trust in us. 

OUR VISION 

We will improve the quality of life in the United States 

by transforming the delivery of healthcare services.

05759-Narr-R1.indd   1

4/10/18   2:19 PM

 
 
Keith G. Myers
Chairman and 
Chief Executive Officer

TO OUR VALUED STAKEHOLDERS:

In the countless conversations I have every year — at conferences and conventions, and with partners, peers, 

and industry leaders — I am often asked to share the most important thing I have learned from more than 20 

years of providing service in the healthcare sector.

It is a question I ask myself quite frequently, and it’s difficult to pin down one concise answer. As I look back 

on 2017 — on what we have accomplished and where we are going — I come back to a thought that sums up 

our mission quite well: When it comes to something as intimate, personal, and impactful as healthcare, there 

is no substitute for friends and neighbors taking care of their own.

At LHC Group, we know that all healthcare is local, and it is our foundational mission to provide care 

at a personal level. Long ago, we made the strategic choice to operate as a “house of brands” — retaining 

established and well-known provider names and personnel in the communities they serve. This allows us to 

maintain brand awareness and leverage existing community relationships as we work to provide that personal 

level of care to as many people as we can reach.

I believe our ongoing success and continued growth in 2017 confirms the effectiveness of this approach. It is 

a key differentiator for our organization and a driving force behind LHC Group’s strong reputation as a leader 

and innovator in the in-home healthcare industry.

Our employees  —  the clinicians and support staff on the front lines, as well as all who support them from 

our Home Office — are LHC Group’s greatest asset and the key to our ongoing success. Our company will 

only be as successful as they are in providing consistent quality service to patients and families.

So many of you know the story of our origin — a story of service to four underserved patients in a small 

rural community in Louisiana, the foundation of a single home health agency, and growth into a publicly 

traded NASDAQ company and one of the nation’s leading providers of in-home healthcare. We will never 

abandon the lessons and values we’ve learned along this great journey.

Organic growth was the driving force behind our expansion in those early days, as we joined forces with 

more and more local agencies in different communities around the nation. And it remains a key to our success 

as we move forward.

Local healthcare providers — from our partner health systems to small clinics — have a legacy and 

responsibility as leaders and guardians for the health of individuals in the communities they serve. 

It is our mission to help every agency, facility, and partner in our family live up to and exceed this 

fundamental expectation.

That is no easy thing. Managing the massive array of needs, demands, interests, and perspectives in today’s 

challenging healthcare environment is tough. It is a constant reminder that we must remain flexible and 

adaptable in thinking about our long-term strategy.

That being said, I am pleased to say that my confidence in our ability to adapt and thrive — and to help 

each individual agency and community in our family reach its pinnacle — remains as steadfast as ever. We’re 

leading the way as our industry transitions to value-based reimbursement and highly coordinated care, and we 

will continue to lead as our industry evolves. Our model for success is tested, proven, and scalable across the 

spectrum of in-home healthcare and in cities and towns throughout the nation.

As always, we are guided by the “Six Pillars of Excellence” outlined below  — People, Service, Quality, 

Efficiency, Growth, and Ethics. And our unique company culture — putting individual patients, families, 

colleagues, and communities first — and the founding values and principles that reinforce it, will continue 

to differentiate LHC Group and direct our path as we achieve more of our goals and change healthcare in 

America for the better.

05759-Narr-R1.indd  2

1

4/10/18  2:19 PM

PEOPLE

than 6 percent. This is an all-time low for our organization.

Our team members who go to work each and every day in 

In 2017, our headcount increased by more than 25 percent over 

communities across America are the backbone of our infrastructure. 

2016. We are operating with just over 14,500 employees — the result 

The leaders who guide them are experienced mentors and teachers, 

of aggressive M&A activity while utilizing a just-in-time (JIT) hiring 

dedicated to nurturing, leading by example, and bringing out the best 

strategy. JIT allows our human resources and talent acquisition teams 

in their teams through a perspective grounded in servant leadership.

to plan for organic growth ahead of anticipated need and leverage staff 

We learned long ago that leadership will not produce sustainable 

forecasting to ensure a balanced full-time employee relationship to 

results without a fundamental grounding in humanity — without the 

current and planned patient census.

understanding that our colleagues are not the means to an end, but 

With our continued commitment to strong orientation 

real people who have something to offer our organization. Every 

programs, employee voice, and transparency, our turnover has 

employee is unique, adding their own skills, experiences, values, 

declined to historic lows. And our overall employment reputation 

backgrounds, influences, and beliefs to a team approach that helps us 

continues to strengthen — in 2017 our social media rankings on 

customize our service for our equally unique patients.  

sites such as Glassdoor and others reached the highest levels in 

Our leaders measure success by how effectively they educate, 

our company’s history.

empower, and inspire those in their charge to produce the best 

The healthcare employment market is extraordinarily competitive, 

possible outcomes for our individual patients and hospital partners 

but LHC Group is a leader in attracting the best healthcare and 

serving communities around the nation — and great servant leaders 

support professionals in the industry. I can say with confidence that 

take the time to interact on a personal level with the people they lead.

our growth, success, and reputation for quality and patient satisfaction 

It is no secret that staffing and retention remain among the 

demonstrate that we have assembled one of the finest teams in the in-

toughest challenges across the in-home healthcare sector, and I am 

home healthcare industry.

proud to report that because of our unrelenting focus on people — 

our most important asset — our vacancy rate has dropped to less 

SERVICE

14,554

Service is the heart and soul of our organization and our culture at 

LHC Group. Everything we do is measured against the results we 

produce for our patients and our partners — from clinical outcomes to 

EMPLOYEES

10,922

11,598

10,767

financial performance.

I am pleased to report that — as clearly evidenced by our quality and 

patient satisfaction scores detailed under the QUALITY pillar — our 

level of service here at LHC Group has never been better.

Our ongoing goal is to provide an expanding variety of healthcare 

services for our patients in the communities we serve. We are always 

looking for new opportunities and innovations to enhance the level and 

value of our service.

In 2017, we began offering a nurse practitioner (NP) service line 

in a few select communities. Our NPs are able to provide a primary 

caregiver for patients who may not have access to a doctor’s office due 

to geographical location or other circumstances. 

2014

2015

2016

2017

2

05759-Narr-R2.indd  3

4/12/18  2:48 PM

 
We have achieved good results and received positive feedback so far 

in rolling out our NP service line, and we plan to continue development, 

enhancement, and expansion as we move forward — providing 

additional value for our patients.

The consistent contact we maintain with our patients and their 

families is a vital part of achieving the best possible health outcomes 

and avoiding unnecessary re-hospitalizations. Our call center is 

open every day around the clock, and our team members reach 

out to patients on a regular schedule to make sure we minimize any 

unresolved issues and head off potential problems.

We are proud of the legacy of outstanding service our team is 

building here at LHC Group. We see that legacy as both an honor and a 

responsibility — as a standard that requires around-the-clock dedication 

and vigilance to sustain and enhance. If we do not maintain our focus 

on the people we serve, and on the people most directly responsible for 

providing that service, we cannot expect success to follow.

Service is the reason we exist. Our company’s leaders — if they are 

to succeed in our organization — must realize one important thing: 

Great service does not come from their superior skills or talents, but 

from the hard work and dedication of the individual teams they lead. It 

is at the core of being a servant leader.

Great service comes from the talented clinicians who travel every 

day to care for the neediest in their community. It comes from the 

nurses, therapists, and support staff who serve on weekends and 

holidays. And it comes from those who go the extra mile — every 

time — to uphold and deliver on our promise of quality care for the 

patients, families, and communities we are privileged to serve.

As a national provider, delivering quality service on a consistent basis 

requires an extraordinary amount of cooperation and coordination 

“Great service comes from those 

who go the extra mile — every 

time — to uphold and deliver on 

our promise of quality care for the 

patients, families, and communities 

we are privileged to serve.”

Compounded Annual Growth Rate = 13.9%
ADMISSIONS
(All service lines)

172,983

153,951

209,977

across a widely dispersed and diverse group of people. Our team has 

clearly demonstrated the ability to accomplish this task on a level that 

142,087

continues to impress industry analysts and peers.

We learned long ago that efficient decision-making — the ability to 

confront and resolve problems as quickly and as close to the source 

as possible — is the key to providing great service. Our experience 

demonstrates that this is most effectively accomplished by utilizing the 

talent and experience of our people in the communities they serve —  

not by adopting a top-down, corporate-focused approach.

2014

2015

2016

2017

05759-Narr-R1.indd  4

3

4/10/18  2:19 PM

“We are in the business of helping people. 

We will continue to set the gold standard of quality, 

and, if needed, be ready and willing to be different 

to achieve that standard.”

In communities across the nation, our local teams operate 

worked hard to earn a reputation for excellence among healthcare 

with the autonomy to confront problems in real time and 

providers. It is our most effective “sales strategy” with the many 

customize their level of care to the individuals they serve. When 

patients, families, and communities we engage with every day.

we encourage decisive leadership at the local level, we are more 

I cannot over-emphasize how much our quality scores — and 

strategic and less reactive as we work through everyday concerns, 

the ability to provide a full and scaled continuum of in-home 

setbacks, and roadblocks —  never settling for the status quo, but 

healthcare — come up in discussions with potential joint venture 

always finding opportunities for improvement.

partners. Quite often it is the difference maker and driver of choice.

QUALITY

The importance of these quality scores means we must continue 

to build upon our foundation with professionalism and vigilance. 

We must continue to have pride in our work and execute our 

Our leadership team could not be more pleased with the level of 

responsibilities to those we serve with care and integrity, always 

consistent quality we have achieved — and maintained — across 

taking the time to listen to and answer with dignity and patience the 

our entire organization over the past few years. Each year, as 

questions and concerns of the many we are privileged to serve.

independent industry and regulatory analysts release their highly 

LHC Group’s home health quality measurements maintained their 

anticipated results, LHC Group continues to lead in almost every 

industry-leading status throughout 2017. We consistently achieved 

measurable quality and patient satisfaction standard.

industry-leading scores in our Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Consistent quality translates to value. When we provide excellent 

Services (CMS) Star Rating results.

healthcare service, satisfied patients and families, as well as our 

In the most recent CMS results, released in January 2018, 98 

hospital and health system partners, develop loyalty to our LHC 

percent of LHC Group locations achieved a rating of four stars or 

Group family. Customer service in the healthcare industry — above 

better. In the quality category, we produced an average score of 

and beyond minimum expectations — is critical to customer loyalty. 

4.55, excluding recent acquisitions. That is an improvement over 

Patients and families expect and deserve high quality from their 

our 4.51 average from the previous report released in October 

healthcare providers.

2017. This compares quite favorably with a national average that 

Our LHC Group family strives every day to build on a legacy of 

has maintained a range of 3.24 to 3.26 for the last five quarters. In 

healthcare excellence and quality. Our desire to achieve this legacy 

the patient satisfaction category, our average rating was 4.2 stars, 

is the foundation upon which our company was built. We have 

compared with the industry average of 3.6.

4

05759-Narr-R1.indd  5

4/10/18  2:19 PM

Compounded Annual Growth Rate = 13.5%
NET SERVICE REVENUE
(in millions)

2014

2015

2016

2017

$733.6

$816.4

$914.8

$1,072.1

In 2017, our company earned HomeCare Elite® recognition for 71 

standards on eight out of eight Hospice Consumer Assessment of  

percent of our home health locations — a significant increase over the 

Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) — key indicators of 

60 percent that earned recognition in 2016. This means that 217 of 

patient satisfaction — and exceeded the national benchmark on 

our home health locations were named in this annual ranking of the 

all seven “Hospice Item Set” quality measures. These measures 

top-performing home health agencies in the United States — with 56 

— required by CMS — are designed to measure the hospice 

locations recognized as top 500, and 21 recognized as top 100.

patient/family experience of care and compliance against expected 

We continue leading our industry in accreditations by The Joint 

hospice clinical processes.

Commission. Less than 15 percent of all home care agencies 

In addition to exceeding the current CMS quality measures, 

nationwide earn Joint Commission accreditation. LHC Group 

the hospice division also exceeded the national benchmark in the 

remains the only national home health provider that is 100 percent 

CMS proposed quality measures, which address the number of 

accredited by the Joint Commission.

visits made by various members of the hospice interdisciplinary 

We continue utilizing dashboards and internal reporting tools to 

group within the last three-to-seven days of the patient’s life.

obtain real-time data — allowing our Home Office quality teams and 

At our extended care hospitals, we provide care for patients 

performance improvement coordinators in the field to help individual 

who are critically ill and suffering with medically complex issues 

agencies address problem areas quickly and raise their level of service.

that require intensive services for a longer period of time than 

Our on-the-ground, highly trained performance improvement 

in traditional hospitals. Once again, our long-term acute care 

coordinators help connect our experienced Home Office staff with 

hospitals (LTACHs), a part of our facility-based services, achieved 

our local agencies. Working together, they identify concerns, set 

overall scores better than national averages (compared with 

priorities, and develop plans to address the specific needs of each 

similar facilities around the nation) according to the 2017 data 

individual location.

provided by CMS and patient satisfaction surveys conducted by 

The ability to design and implement improvements in real time 

Press Ganey.

and at the agency level — without relying on more retroactive 

We will never lose sight of the vital role we play in making the 

data — helps us achieve and maintain our current position as the 

world a better place for the people we serve across the nation. 

in-home healthcare industry’s recognized leader in quality.

We are in the business of helping people. We will continue to set 

LHC Group’s hospice division continued to lead peers in quality 

the gold standard of quality, and, if needed, be ready and willing 

measures in 2017. The division met or exceeded national benchmark 

to be different to achieve that standard.

05759-Narr-R2.indd  6

5

4/12/18  2:48 PM

EFFICIENCY

Among our greatest responsibilities here at LHC Group is that of 

providing and growing value for our partners, patients, employees, 

shareholders, and communities. All of these stakeholders have 

demonstrated their commitment to stand with us in our mission to 

reach even more people with quality healthcare.

By every measure imaginable, we lived up to this trust with 

disciplined stewardship and allocation of our capital to investments 

that will fuel our organic and external growth for years to come. We 

also demonstrated another year of strong growth in revenues and 

earnings while keeping our balance sheet in great shape — delivering 

on our mutual goals of maximizing current financial growth and 

sustaining long-term success.

I would like to share some of our more important financial highlights:

•  

For 2017, net service revenues increased 17.2 percent to    

$1.07 billion — pushing us over the symbolic billion-dollar

milestone for the first time in our history. This revenue 

growth far exceeded the average increase of 9.9 percent for

the S&P 500.

CONSOLIDATED GENERAL 
AND ADMINISTRATIVE 
EXPENSE 
(Expressed as percentage of net service revenue)

33.0%

32.5%

32.0%

31.5%

31.0%

30.5%

30.0%

29.5%

29.0%

28.5%

28.0%

6

• 

On December 31, 2017, LHC Group’s return on assets was 

7.1 percent, compared with an average of 2.5 percent for 

the S&P 500.

• 

While we have faced consistent headwinds in Medicare

reimbursements over the past several years, we were once 

again successful across our organization in achieving more 

with less overhead expense. For 2017, our general and  

administrative expenses were 27.6 percent of revenue 

after adjusting for one-time merger and acquisition 

costs — down from 29.6 percent of revenue in 2016, as we  

have continued to leverage substantial investments in 

technology and implemented our proven model across  

recently acquired locations. I cannot overstate how great an 

accomplishment this is for us, and how important it is to 

ensuring that our patients and their families receive the 

highest levels of clinical quality.

• 

Our balance sheet continued to have little debt, with a 

current leverage ratio of 1.4x at year-end compared with an  

average leverage ratio of 4.4x for the S&P 500 companies.  

Even after our expected merger with Almost Family, we are  

anticipating that our leverage will remain under 1.5x.

GROWTH

Growth is not the only measure of success, but it is an 

indispensable and never-ending pursuit of any thriving organization. 

As a leading healthcare provider for communities around the 

nation, we have a responsibility to continue pursuing opportunities 

for growth and expansion in conjunction with our mission, goals, 

and strategic outlook.

Growth — in the form of both new partnerships and acquisitions — is 

vital to the continued health of our organization. Vigilance in the pursuit 

of opportunity enables us to fulfill our duty to stakeholders, employees, 

and, most importantly, to the patients and families who depend on us to 

remain strong and be there to meet their healthcare needs.

As 2017 came to an end, our company operated almost 450 locations 

across all our service lines in 27 states around the nation. We operated 

joint venture partnerships with 74 health systems comprising 250 

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

hospitals serving communities, towns, and cities nationwide.

05759-Narr-R1.indd  7

4/10/18  2:19 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LOCATIONS

2014

2015

2016

2017

340

363

376

ONE COMPANY. 
ONE FAMILY. 
ONE FOCUS.

On April 1, 2018, LHC Group and Almost Family — two of the 

in-home healthcare sector’s most established and recognized 

leaders — finalized an all-stock “merger of equals.” We are now 

one family of healthcare providers with one focus — providing 

442

quality care to people and communities around the nation.

With the merger, LHC Group operates more than 780 

locations in 36 states, with approximately 30,000 employees 

and a licensed service area that covers more than 60 percent 

A notable achievement occurred in November 2017 with the 

of the U.S. population aged 65 and over. We have successfully 

announcement of our intended merger with Almost Family of 

combined two leadership teams with an industry-wide 

Louisville, Kentucky. The merger was finalized on April 1, 2018.

reputation as the best in their class, a broad spectrum of talent, 

We are truly thrilled at the prospects this merger holds for LHC 

deep industry relationships, and a proven track record for 

Group and Almost Family. With our combined assets, talents, and 

creating shareholder value.

experience, we will enhance service across the continuum of care, 

As a team of dedicated healthcare providers, we are 

improve service and financial performance for our joint venture 

genuinely excited by the promise this holds for our future. At 

hospital and health system partners, and increase opportunities 

every level of our organization, the excitement generated by 

for new partnerships throughout the nation. 

this momentous milestone is palpable and invigorating.

Our company will be positioned as one of the primary 

Both companies entered this merger in solid condition — 

consolidators in the fragmented home health and hospice 

both financially and operationally. LHC Group is now well-

industries — and the preferred in-home healthcare partner to 

positioned to lead the industry’s transition to value-based 

current and potential hospital joint venture partners as well as 

reimbursement and highly coordinated care, enhance service 

referral sources. We will be an innovative healthcare provider 

across the continuum of care, and deliver outstanding results 

with the capability to enhance in-home healthcare quality and 

for our joint venture hospital and health system partners.

value for even more seniors, veterans, and other recovering 

Following the merger, our combined home health, hospice, 

patients across America.

and personal care resources include more than 570 home 

Our joint venture partnership model is a tested and proven 

health locations, more than 105 hospice locations, and more 

success, and we will continue that strategy with hospitals and 

than 85 personal care locations across our 36-state footprint.

health systems. Organic growth — at the local level in cities 

Post-closing, our continued low leverage means we 

and towns across America — will also continue as a key focus 

are well-positioned to execute upon a robust pipeline of 

for our organization. It is ingrained in our mission to reach as 

acquisitions and joint venture opportunities. Both companies 

many individuals as possible with quality in-home healthcare, 

have been very active in pursuing these joint ventures, and our 

and it reflects our focus on communities and on maintaining and 

strengthening local brands.

CONTINUED ON PAGE 9

05759-Narr-R1.indd  8

7

4/10/18  2:19 PM

LHC Group states

We accomplish our mission by providing support for our 

for LHC Group. Here are a few highlights:

acquired agencies while allowing the autonomy to adapt and 

• 

In April, LHC Group entered into a home health and hospice

function in their respective market. For our hospital and health 

joint venture with Pleasant Valley Hospital in West Virginia. 

system partners, we provide customized solutions based on their 

Pleasant Valley Hospital is a 101-bed, not-for-profit hospital

specific needs.

that, in partnership with Cabell Huntington Hospital and 

We work alongside the nation’s leading hospitals and health 

Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine,

systems, and our joint venture model is recognized across the 

provides quality healthcare through a wide range of  

industry for producing results — reducing avoidable readmissions, 

medical services and specialties to residents of Mason and

improving clinical outcomes, and enhancing operational performance.

Jackson counties in West Virginia, and Gallia and Meigs

The year 2017 saw many notable acquisitions and partnerships 

counties in Ohio. 

8

05759-Narr-R1.indd  9

4/10/18  2:19 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
• 

In June, LHC Group joined Baptist Memorial Health Care

in a joint venture to enhance home health and hospice

services in Tennessee and Mississippi — with possible future

ONE COMPANY. ONE FAMILY. ONE FOCUS.
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 7

expansion into Arkansas. Baptist Memorial Health Care,

shareholders should expect to see even more activity here 

based in Memphis, is a 12-hospital system spanning a

than in the past. We are also very enthusiastic about the 

three-state area.

healthcare innovation (HCI) business that Almost Family 

• 

In July, LHC Group added a stand-alone home health

formed several years ago to pursue complementary and 

location in Murray, Kentucky, to our current joint venture

innovative strategies related to home healthcare-provided 

partnership with LifePoint Health.

homes — but outside of the more traditional home health, 

• 

In September, LHC Group and CHRISTUS Health finalized  

hospice, and personal care operations. 

a new joint venture involving home health, hospice, and  

To capture the strategic benefits of the merger, we 

facility-based services across four states. The JV includes   

worked diligently in combining our two companies into one 

23 service locations of CHRISTUS Health — 10 home health  

family. This was not an overnight process, but it is a process 

agencies, five hospice programs, one community-based 

that we do very well. Although confident in our track record 

home care service, one inpatient hospice unit, and six  

of integrating acquisitions and joint ventures successfully, 

LTACHs.

we began focusing on the important aspect of integration 

• 

In December, LHC Group and Erlanger Health System 

planning well in advance — during the comprehensive due 

finalized a new joint venture for home health and 

diligence efforts conducted prior to signing the merger 

community-based services in Chattanooga and  

agreement in November 2017.

southeast Tennessee. The JV includes a Chattanooga 

Through those rigorous and dedicated efforts, we 

facility providing both skilled home healthcare and 

have been working diligently to plan for the integration 

non-skilled, community-based services, further 

of systems, processes, and personnel, as well as working 

expanding LHC Group’s joint venture presence and  

to educate and encourage the approximately 30,000 

services footprint in the state of Tennessee.  

combined employees who are the face of our organization 

Erlanger Health System, based in Chattanooga,  

among the people we are privileged to serve.

Tennessee, operates four acute-care hospitals in  

Yes, LHC Group is now a much larger organization than 

that state.

ETHICS

we were in 2017, but our values, purpose, and inner essence 

of integrity and empathy for the people we serve remains as 

individually focused as they were in 1994, when one nurse 

decided to check in on four neighboring patients after they 

At LHC Group, we remind ourselves every day how vitally important 

had been discharged from the local hospital.

it is to maintain the highest standards of integrity, honesty, and 

We were born in small-town America, with a mission to 

responsibility. We cannot stress enough the importance of always 

serve those in need. This is why we exist. This is why we 

doing the right thing, without exception. Compliance with the 

persist. This is why — no matter how much we achieve  — 

law, LHC Group’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, and policies and 

we will never waiver in our duty to set the standard for 

procedures is the responsibility of every employee at every level  

healthcare service in our industry. 

of our organization — without exception.

05759-Narr-R1.indd  10

9

4/10/18  2:19 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
“Our philosophy of a strong work ethic, integrity, humility, and overall 

excellence will continue to guide us as we embrace our expanding role as 

one of the nation’s most influential in-home healthcare providers.”

Our legacy and ability to continue achieving long-term 

end-of-episode audit process is present at each agency to review 

sustainable success depends upon our everyday behaviors and 

each claim prior to its release for billing. Each one of our audit 

choices. At each individual agency in communities across the 

programs includes integrated action plans.

nation, our team members understand that it is always important 

LHC Group’s comprehensive program stands as the example of 

to be honest and truthful in everything they do, in every instance, 

excellence in our industry.

regardless of the circumstances or pressures.

We are proud of our reputation as a leader in compliance. On 

When we take integrity-based action every day, we reinforce 

numerous occasions, the National Association for Home Care 

and build on a legacy where success is defined and measured by 

has invited LHC Group to present on the effectiveness of our 

both our performance and our adherence to the values that have 

compliance program.

always been the bedrock of our organization.

The year 2017 was another great one for LHC Group, and 

Operating from a premise of integrity and respect will always 

I look forward to the many ways we will continue leading the 

be more than words to us. Our values are our filter and guiding 

improvements and adaptations our industry needs as we move 

light for the work we do every day, and for our decisions, our 

forward. LHC Group will lead by example. Our philosophy of  

conversations, and the assumptions we make about people. A 

a strong work ethic, integrity, humility, and overall excellence will 

focus on our core foundation of integrity — as we seek to achieve 

continue to guide us as we embrace our expanding role as one  

positive outcomes for our team and our patients — helps us build 

of the nation’s most influential in-home healthcare providers.

a legacy of success that will far outlive our current tenure as 

In doing so, we will lead our employees, our company, and our 

in-home healthcare leaders.

industry through the maze of change to reach even more people with 

In demonstrating our never-ending commitment to compliance 

quality healthcare, achieve superior results, and succeed together.

and integrity, we increased our resources in 2017 and now have 

a dedicated staff of 27 full-time employees focused entirely on 

Sincerely, 

compliance. The staff includes nine full-time registered nurses 

dedicated to compliance auditing and monitoring. And over the past 

four years our company has earmarked a budget of more than $2 

million per year solely for the efforts of our Compliance Department. 

We also continue our agency-level focused compliance audit 

program, targeting areas identified by data mining, compliance 

Keith G. Myers

reports to the hotline, or other means. In addition, our 

Chairman and CEO

10

05759-Narr-R2.indd  11

4/12/18  2:48 PM

 
 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(in thousands, except share and per share data) 

Net service revenue 

Cost of service revenue 

Gross margin 

Provision for bad debts 

General and administrative expenses 

Impairment of intangibles and other 

Loss on disposal of assets 

Operating income 

Interest expense 

Non-operating income 

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 

Income tax expense 

Net income 

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 

Year Ended December 31

2017 

2016

$1,072,086 
675,810 

396,276 
9,484 

310,539 
1,511 
60 

74,682 
(3,876) 
524 

71,330 
10,994 

60,386 
10,274 

$914,823

557,650 

357,173 

14,790 

270,622 

— 

1,199 

70,562 

(2,936) 

492 

68,118 

22,176 

45,942 

9,359 

Net income attributable to LHC Group’s common stockholders 

$50,112 

$36,583  

Earnings per share – basic: 

Net income attributable to LHC Group’s common stockholders 

$2.83 

$2.08 

Earnings per share – diluted:

Net income attributable to LHC Group’s common stockholders 

$2.79 

$2.07 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic 

Diluted 

17,715,992 
17,961,018 

17,559,477 

17,682,820 

05759-Narr-R3.indd  12

11

4/13/18  12:46 PM

 
 
 
L E A D I N G  T H E   C H A N G E

2017 Form 10-K

05759-LHC.indd  1

4/4/18  4:23 PM

05759-LHC.indd   2

4/4/18   4:23 PM

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K
3  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(cid:31)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017  
or
(cid:31)  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

Commission file number: 001-33989

LHC GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 

71-0918189
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

901 Hugh Wallis Road South
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(337) 233-1307
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share 
(Title of each class) 

NASDAQ Global Select Market
(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None

3 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes (cid:31)   No (cid:31)
3 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes (cid:31)   No (cid:31)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has 
3
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes (cid:31)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive 
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter 
3
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes (cid:31)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (117 CFR 229.405) is not contained 
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by 
3
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  (cid:31)
Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-accelerated  filer,  or  a  smaller 
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 
of the Exchange Act.

   No (cid:31)

   No (cid:31)

3
Large accelerated filer  (cid:31)

             Accelerated filer  (cid:31)             Non-accelerated filer  (cid:31)             Smaller reporting company  (cid:31)    

Emerging growth company  (cid:31)   

3 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   Yes (cid:31)   No (cid:31)
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying 
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  (cid:31)
As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1.1 billion 
based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. For purposes of this determination shares beneficially 
owned by officers, directors and ten percent stockholders have been excluded, which does not constitute a determination that such persons 
are affiliates. 

There were 18,285,192 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, issued and outstanding as of February 26, 2018. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 are incorporated by reference in 
Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are 
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

05759-LHC.indd   3

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
LHC GROUP, INC.

Table of Contents

PART I. 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

Item 1. 

Item 1A. 

Item 1B. 

Item 2. 

Item 3. 

Item 4. 

PART II. 

Item 5. 

Item 6. 

Item 7. 

Business  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   23

Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   39

Properties  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   39

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40

Mine Safety Disclosures  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   41

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and  
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   42

Selected Financial Data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   43

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   44

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Item 8. 

Item 9. 

Item 9A. 

Item 9B. 

PART III. 

Item 10. 

Item 11. 

Item 12. 

Item 13. 

Item 14. 

PART IV. 

Item 15. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Disclosure Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   65

Other Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   67

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   68

Executive Compensation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   68

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  . . . . . . .   68

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   69

Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   69

Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   70

Signatures 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exhibit Index 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Form 10-K

05759-LHC.indd  4

4/4/18  4:23 PM

 
LHC GROUP, INC.

Table of Contents

PART I. 

Item 1. 

Item 1A. 

Item 1B. 

Item 2. 

Item 3. 

Item 4. 

PART II. 

Item 5. 

Item 6. 

Item 7. 

Item 8. 

Item 9. 

Item 9A. 

Item 9B. 

PART III. 

Item 10. 

Item 11. 

Item 12. 

Item 13. 

Item 14. 

PART IV. 

Item 15. 

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   40

Mine Safety Disclosures  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   41

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and  

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   42

Selected Financial Data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   43

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   44

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   64

Disclosure Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   65

Other Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   67

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   68

Executive Compensation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   68

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  . . . . . . .   68

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   69

Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   69

Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   70

Signatures 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exhibit Index 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements relate to future plans and strategies, anticipated 

Business  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

events or trends, future financial performance and expectations and beliefs concerning matters that are not historical facts or that 

Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   23

necessarily depend upon future events. The words “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “foresee,” 

Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   39

“estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “intend,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Specifically, this 

Properties  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   39

Annual Report on Form 10-K contains, among others, forward-looking statements about:

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

PART I

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the information incorporated by reference herein contain certain statements and information that 

may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of  

•  our expectations regarding financial condition or results of operations for periods after December 31, 2017;

•  our critical accounting policies;

•  our business strategies and our ability to grow our business;

•  our participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

•  the reimbursement levels of Medicare and other third-party payors;

•  the prompt receipt of payments from Medicare and other third-party payors;

•  our future sources of and needs for liquidity and capital resources;

•  the effect of any regulatory changes under the current presidential administration;

•  the effect of any changes in market rates on our operations and cash flows;

•  our ability to obtain financing;

•  our ability to make payments as they become due;

•  the outcomes of various routine and non-routine governmental reviews, audits and investigations;

•  our expansion strategy, the successful integration of recent acquisitions and, if necessary, the ability to relocate or restructure our 

current facilities;

•  the value of our proprietary technology;

•  the impact of legal proceedings;

•  our insurance coverage;

•  our competitors and our competitive advantages;

•  our ability to attract and retain valuable employees;

•  the price of our stock;

•  our compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;

•  our compliance with health care laws and regulations;

•  our compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission laws and regulations and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements;

•  the impact of federal and state government regulation on our business;

•  the impact of changes in or future interpretations of fraud, anti-kickback or other laws;

•  that the required stockholder approvals of the proposed transaction with Almost Family, Inc. (“Almost Family”) may not be obtained;

•  that the other condition(s) to closing of the proposed transaction with Almost Family may not be satisfied;

•  the length of time necessary to consummate the proposed transaction with Almost Family, which may be longer than anticipated for 

various reasons;

•  that the businesses of the Company and Almost Family will not be integrated successfully;

•  that the cost savings, synergies, growth and other benefits from the proposed transaction with Almost Family may not be fully realized 

or may take longer to realize than expected;

•  the diversion of management time on issues associated with the proposed transaction with Almost Family;

•  that the Company or Almost Family may be unable to obtain all other regulatory approvals in connection with the proposed transaction;

•  that costs associated with the integration of the businesses of the Company and Almost Family are higher than anticipated; and

•  litigation risks related to the proposed transaction with Almost Family.

05759-LHC.indd  5

4/4/18  4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

5

LHC GROUP

The forward-looking statements included in this report reflect our current views and assumptions only as of the date this report is filed with 

the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, we assume no responsibility and do not intend to release updates 

or revisions to forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 

The occurrence of any of the events described in (i) Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated  

by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or, (ii) with respect to the risks associated with the proposed transaction with Almost 

Family, under the heading “Risk Factors” in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus that is included in the registration statement  

on Form S-4 that was filed by the Company with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction, and other events that we have 

not predicted or assessed, could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition, and business, and any such 

forward-looking statements should not be relied on as a prediction of future events.

We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by this cautionary statement. In addition, with respect to all of our forward-looking 

statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation 

Reform Act of 1995.

You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the information incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and 

the documents filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K completely and with the understanding that our actual future results 

or achievements may differ materially from what we expect or anticipate.

Unless otherwise indicated, “LHC Group,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company,” refer to LHC Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Item 1. Business.

Overview

We provide post-acute health care services to patients through our home nursing agencies, hospice agencies, community-based 

services agencies, and long-term acute care hospitals (“LTACHs”). As of December 31, 2017, through our wholly- and majority-owned 

subsidiaries, equity joint ventures and controlled affiliates, we operated 442 service providers in 27 states within the continental  

United States. We operate in four segments: home health services, hospice services, community-based services, and facility-based services.

Our home health service locations offer a wide range of services, including skilled nursing, medically-oriented social services and physical, 

occupational, and speech therapy. The nurses, home health aides, and therapists in our home health agencies work closely with patients 

and their families to design and implement individualized treatment plans in accordance with a physician-prescribed plan of care. As of 

December 31, 2017, we operated 318 home health service locations, of which 159 are wholly-owned by us, 153 are majority-owned by 

us through equity joint ventures, three are under license lease arrangements, and the operations of the remaining three locations are 

managed by us.

Our hospices provide end-of-life care to patients with terminal illnesses through interdisciplinary teams of physicians, nurses, home  

health aides, counselors, and volunteers. We offer a wide range of services, including pain and symptom management, emotional and 

spiritual support, inpatient and respite care, homemaker services, and counseling. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 91 hospice 

locations, of which 45 are wholly-owned by us, 44 are majority-owned by us through equity joint ventures, and two are under license 

lease arrangements.

Our community-based service locations offer assistance with activities of daily living to elderly, chronically ill, and disabled patients.  

As of December 31, 2017, we operated 12 locations, of which 10 are wholly-owned by us and two are majority-owned by us through 

equity joint ventures.

Our LTACH locations provide services primarily to patients with complex medical conditions who have transitioned out of a hospital 

intensive care unit but whose conditions remain too severe for treatment in a non-acute setting. As of December 31, 2017, our LTACHs 

had 353 licensed beds. We operated 11 LTACHs with 15 locations, of which all but one are located within host hospitals. As part of our 

facility-based services segment, we also own and operate two pharmacies, a family health center, a rural health clinic, and two physical 

therapy clinics. Of these 21 facility-based services locations, eight are wholly-owned by us, 12 are majority-owned by us through equity 

joint ventures, and one is managed by us.

6

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   6

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Our net service revenue by segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (amounts in thousands):

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Year Ended December 31, 

Home Health Services 
Hospice Services 
Community-Based Services 
Facility-Based Services 

Consolidated Net Service Revenue 

2017 

2016 

2015

$  783,507
159,197
46,909
82,473

$ 1,072,086 

$ 665,896
134,948
43,891
70,088

$ 914,823

$ 613,188
85,854
41,202
76,122

$ 816,366

For further information regarding the financial performance of our segments, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our founders began operations in September 1994 as St. Landry Home Health, Inc. in Palmetto, Louisiana. After several years of 

expansion, our founders reorganized their business and began operating as Louisiana Healthcare Group, Inc. in June 2000. In March 2001, 

Louisiana Healthcare Group, Inc. reorganized and became a wholly owned subsidiary of The Healthcare Group, Inc., a Louisiana 

business corporation. In December 2002, The Healthcare Group, Inc. merged into LHC Group, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company, 

with LHC Group, LLC being the surviving entity. In January 2005, LHC Group, LLC established a wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, 

LHC Group, Inc. and on February 9, 2005, LHC Group, LLC merged into LHC Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation with LHC Group, Inc. 

being the surviving entity. Our principal executive offices are located at 901 Hugh Wallis Road South, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. 

Our telephone number is (337) 233-1307. Our website is www.lhcgroup.com. Information contained on our website is not part of or 

incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proposed Merger with Almost Family

On November 15, 2017, we announced the execution of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered into among 

the Company, Almost Family, Inc. (“Almost Family”), and Hammer Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the 

Company, providing for a “merger of equals” business combination of the Company and Almost Family. The Merger Agreement provides 

that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Almost Family (the “Merger”), 

with Almost Family continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which was unanimously approved by both our board of directors and the Almost Family  

board of directors, the stockholders of Almost Family will be entitled to receive 0.9150 shares of our common stock for each share of 

Almost Family common stock, plus the cash equivalent of any fractional share. Upon the closing of the proposed Merger, the Company 

stockholders will own approximately 58.5% and the Almost Family stockholders will own approximately 41.5% of the combined company.

In connection with the proposed Merger, we filed with Almost Family a definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC on 

February 13, 2018. The definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus was also included in a registration statement on Form S-4 that was 

filed by us and declared effective by the SEC on February 12, 2018. The definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus relates to a special 

meeting of stockholders to be held by each the Company and Almost Family on March 29, 2018 to vote on matters in connection with the 

proposed Merger. The definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus contains additional important information concerning the proposed 

transaction and can be accessed on the SEC’s website.

On February 22, 2018, we issued a joint press release with Almost Family announcing that the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino 

Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”), with respect to the proposed Merger, has expired, satisfying one of the important 

conditions to the Merger.

The Merger is expected to close on April 1, 2018, subject to the approval of both companies’ stockholders and the satisfaction of other 

customary closing conditions. See Part I, Item A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

05759-LHC.indd   7

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

7

 
 
LHC GROUP

Business Strategy

Our objective is to become the leading provider of home health, hospice, community-based services, and LTACHs in the United States. 

To achieve this objective, we intend to:

Drive internal growth in existing markets. We intend to drive internal growth in our current markets by increasing the number of (health 

care) providers from whom we receive referrals and by expanding the breadth of our services in each market. We intend to achieve this 

growth by: (1) continuing to educate (health care) providers about the benefits of our services, (2) reinforcing the position of our agencies 

and facilities as community assets, (3) maintaining our emphasis on high-quality medical care for our patients, (4) identifying related 

products and services needed by our patients and their communities, and (5) providing a superior work environment for our employees.

Achieve margin improvement through the active management of costs. The majority of our net service revenue is generated under 

the Medicare prospective payment systems (“PPS”) through which we are paid pre-determined rates based upon the clinical condition 

and severity of the patients in our care. Because our profitability in a fixed payment system depends upon our ability to manage the costs 

of providing care, we continue to pursue initiatives to improve our margins and net income.

Expand into new markets. We intend to continue expanding into new markets by utilizing our point of care technology, developing  

de novo locations, and acquiring existing Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified agencies in attractive markets throughout the United States.  

We will also continue our unique strategy of partnering with hospitals and health systems, as these ventures provide significant return  

on investment. In addition, we plan to continue acquiring freestanding agencies that can serve as growth platforms in markets we do not 

currently serve in order to support our growth into new markets.

Pursue strategic acquisitions and develop joint ventures. We will continue to identify and evaluate opportunities for strategic 

acquisitions in new and existing markets that will enhance our market position, increase our referral base, and expand the breadth of 

services we offer. We will aim to continue entering into joint ventures with hospitals to provide our current post-acute care services,  

to their patients upon discharge from the hospital setting.

Services

We provide post-acute care services in the United States by providing quality, cost-effective health care services to patients within the 

comfort and privacy of their home, place of residence, or long-term acute care hospital facility. Our services can be broadly classified into 

four principal categories: (1) home health services, (2) hospice services, (3) community-based services, and (4) facility-based services 

offered through our LTACHs.

Home Health Services

Our registered nurses and licensed practical nurses provide a variety of medically necessary services to homebound patients who are 

suffering from acute or chronic illness, recovering from injury or surgery, or who otherwise require care, teaching or monitoring. These 

services include, but are not limited to:

•  wound care and dressing changes,

•  cardiac rehabilitation,

•  infusion therapy,

•  pain management,

•  pharmaceutical administration,

•  skilled observation and assessment, and

•  patient education.

We have also designed proprietary clinical pathways to treat chronic diseases and conditions, including diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, 

Alzheimer’s disease, low vision, spinal stenosis, Parkinson’s disease, osteoporosis, complex wounds, and chronic pain. Through our 

medical social workers, we counsel patients and their families with regard to financial, personal, and social concerns that arise from a 

patient’s health-related problems. We provide skilled nursing, ventilator and tracheotomy services, extended care specialties, medication 

administration and management, and patient and family assistance and education. We also provide management services to third-party 

home nursing agencies, often as an interim solution until proper state and regulatory approvals for an acquisition can be obtained.

8

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   8

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Our physical, occupational and speech therapists provide therapy services to patients in their home. Our therapists coordinate multi-

disciplinary treatment plans with physicians, nurses and social workers to restore basic mobility skills such as getting out of bed and 

walking safely with crutches or a walker. As part of the treatment and rehabilitation process, a therapist will stretch and strengthen muscles, 

test balance and coordination abilities, and teach home exercise programs. Our therapists assist patients and their families with improving 

and maintaining a patient’s ability to perform functional activities of daily living, such as the ability to dress, cook, clean, and manage other 

activities safely in the home environment. Our speech and language therapists provide corrective and rehabilitative treatment to patients 

who suffer from physical or cognitive deficits or disorders that create difficulty with verbal communication or swallowing.

All of our home nursing agencies offer 24-hour personal emergency response system and support services through a third-party service 

provider (“PERS”) for qualified patients who require intensive medical monitoring, but want to maintain an independent lifestyle. These 

services consist principally of a communicator that connects to the telephone line in the patient’s home and a personal help button worn 

or carried by the individual patient that, when activated, initiates a telephone call from the patient’s communicator to PERS’s central 

monitoring facilities. Their trained personnel identify the nature and extent of the patient’s particular need and notify the patient’s family 

members, neighbors, and/or emergency personnel, as needed. We believe our use of this system increases patient satisfaction and 

loyalty by providing our patients a point of contact between scheduled nursing visits. As a result, we believe that we provide a more 

complete regimen of care management than our competitors in the markets in which we operate by offering this service to qualified 

patients as part of their home health plan of care.

Hospice Services

Our Medicare-certified hospice operations provide a full range of hospice services designed to meet the individual physical, spiritual, and 

psychosocial needs of terminally ill patients and their families. Our hospice services are primarily provided in a patient’s home, but can also 

be provided in a nursing home, assisted living facility or hospital. The key services provided through our hospice agencies include pain  

and symptom management accompanied by palliative medication, emotional and spiritual support, inpatient and respite care, homemaker 

services, dietary counseling, and family bereavement counseling and social worker visits for up to 13 months after a patient’s death.

Community-Based Services

Our community-based service operations offer a wide range of services to patients in their home or in a medical facility. The services range 

from assistance with grooming, medication reminders, meal preparation, assistance with feeding, light housekeeping, respite care, 

transportation, and errand services.

Facility-Based Services

Long-term Acute Care Hospitals. Our LTACHs treat patients with severe medical conditions who require a high-level of care and 

frequent monitoring by physicians and other clinical personnel. Patients who receive our services in an LTACH have been diagnosed as 

being too medically unstable for treatment in a non-acute setting. For example, our LTACHs typically serve patients suffering from 

respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders, cardiac disorders, non-healing wounds, renal disorders, cancer, head and neck injuries, and 

mental disorders. We also treat patients diagnosed with musculoskeletal impairments that restrict their ability to perform normal activities  

of daily living.

Other. As part of our facility-based services, we operate an institutional pharmacy, which focuses on providing a full array of services  

to our LTACHs, as well as other non-related facilities. We also operate a family health center, a rural health clinic, two physical therapy 

providers that staff both facilities and outpatient clinics, and one retail pharmacy.

Operations

Financial information relating to the home health, hospice, community-based, and facility-based operating segments of our business, 

including their contributions to our net service revenue, operating income, and total assets for each of the twelve months ended 

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is found in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this 

Annual Report on Form 10-K.

05759-LHC.indd   9

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

9

LHC GROUP

Our home health agencies are operated in one segment that is separated into multiple geographical regions and further separated into 

individual operating areas. Our hospice agencies are operated in one segment that is separated into multiple geographical regions.  

Our community-based agencies are operated in one segment separated into multiple geographic regions. Each of our home health 

agencies is staffed with experienced clinical home health and administrative professionals who provide a wide range of patient care 

services. Each of our home health agencies, hospice agencies, and community-based agencies are licensed and certified by the state 

and federal governments. As of December 31, 2017, 302 of our 318 home health service locations and 77 of our 91 hospice service 

locations were accredited by the Joint Commission, a nationwide commission that establishes standards relating to the facilities, 

administration, quality of patient care, and operation of medical staffs of hospitals. Those not yet accredited are working towards achieving 

this accreditation, a process which can take up to six months. As we acquire companies, we apply for accreditation 12 to 18 months 

after completing the acquisition.

Our facility-based service locations are operated in one segment separated into multiple geographic regions. Our facility-based 

services, through our LTACHs, follow a clinical approach under which each patient is discussed in weekly, multidisciplinary team meetings. 

In these meetings, patient progress is assessed and compared to goals and future goals are set. We believe that this model results in 

higher quality care and more predictable discharge patterns and avoids unnecessary delays.

Our home health service locations use our Service Value Point system, a proprietary clinical resource allocation model and cost 

management system. The system is a quantitative tool that assigns a target level of resource units to a group of patients based upon  

their initial assessment and estimated skilled nursing and therapy needs. The Service Value Point system allows the Director of Nursing or 

Branch Manager to allocate adequate resources throughout the group of patients assigned to his or her care, rather than focusing on  

the profitability of an individual patient.

Patient care is coordinated on-site at the agency level of each home health service, hospice service, and community-based service 

location. All coding, medical records, case management, utilization review, and medical staff credentialing are provided on-site at the 

hospital level of each facility-based service location. Centralized functions such as payroll, accounting, financial reporting, billing, collections, 

regulatory and legal compliance, risk management, pharmacy, information technology, and general clinical oversight accomplished by 

periodic on-site surveys are provided from our executive offices.

Equity Joint Ventures

As of December 31, 2017, we had 74 equity joint ventures including 66 with hospital systems, which are comprised of 165 hospitals, 

four with physicians, and four with other parties.

Our equity joint ventures are generally structured as limited liability companies in which we own a majority equity interest and our partner(s) 

own(s) a minority equity interest. At the time of formation, each party contributes capital to the equity joint venture in the form of cash  

or property. We believe that the amount contributed by each party to the equity joint venture represents their pro-rata portion of the fair 

market value of the equity joint venture, and we maintain processes to confirm and document those determinations. None of our equity 

joint venture partners are required to make or influence referrals to our equity joint ventures. In fact, agreements with our hospital joint 

venture partners require that they follow the same Medicare discharge planning regulations that, among other things, require the hospitals 

to offer each Medicare patient a list of available Medicare-certified home nursing agency options and to allow the patient to choose his  

or her own provider.

We structure our equity joint ventures as either manager-managed or board-managed. We control our manager-managed joint ventures, 

since LHC Group, Inc. is typically designated as the manager to oversee the day-to-day operations of the joint venture. We control our 

board-managed joint ventures, since we typically hold a majority of the votes required to take board action and/or we control the senior 

officer positions, although a majority of our joint ventures require super majority board approval for certain actions. Our equity joint venture 

partners participate in the profits and losses of the joint venture in proportion to their equity interests. Distributions from our equity joint 

ventures are made pro-rata based on percentage ownership interests and are not based on referrals made to the equity joint venture by 

any of the partners.

Most of our equity joint ventures include a buy/sell option that grants to us and our equity joint venture partners the right to require the 

other party to either purchase all of the exercising member’s membership interests or sell to the exercising member all of the non-

exercising member’s membership interests, at the non-exercising member’s option, within 30 days of the receipt of notice of the exercise 

10

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   10

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

of the buy/sell option. In some instances, the purchase price under these buy/sell provisions is based on a multiple of the historical or 

future earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization of the equity joint venture at the time the buy/sell option is exercised. 

In other instances, the buy/sell purchase price will be negotiated by the parties but will be subject to a fair market valuation process.

License Leasing Agreements

As of December 31, 2017, we had three license leasing agreements, through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, granting us the right to use 

the lessors’ home health licenses necessary to operate home nursing agencies and hospice agencies. These license leasing agreements  

are entered into when state law would otherwise prohibit the sale and transfer of the agency. The table below details the monthly fees and 

termination dates of the license leasing agreements.

Number of License
Leasing Agreements 

2017 Current Monthly Fee 

Increase in Monthly Fee 

Initial Termination Dates

1 
1 

1 

$19,294 
Based on net quarterly projections
with an annual cap of $423,000 
Based on net quarterly projections
with an annual cap of $208,000 

5% increase every three years 

2017 with a 2 year automatic renewal

None 

None 

2017 with a 1 year automatic renewal

2017 with a 1 year automatic renewal

In all three license leasing agreements, we have a right of first refusal in the event that the lessor intends to sell the agency to a third party.

Management Services Agreements

As of December 31, 2017, we had four management services agreements under which we manage the operations of three home nursing 

agencies and one LTACH. We do not have ownership interest in these providers. Instead, for a fee, we provide billing, management, and 

other consulting services suited to and designed for the efficient operation of the providers. We are responsible for the costs associated 

with the locations and personnel required for the provision of services.

We have three different types of agreements. One management services agreement provides compensation based on a percentage  

of cash collections for the agency. Another agreement mandates that we are reimbursed for operating expenses and receive a percentage 

of the operating net income of the agency. The final two agreements provide a base monthly fee in addition to reimbursement for 

operating expenses.

The terms of these agreements vary. Two of the management service agreements have a term of five years, with an option to renew for an 

additional five-year term. Renewal for these two agreements is automatic unless either party gives written notice of termination. The term 

of another agreement is for an initial three year period with an automatic renewal for successive one year terms unless terminated by either 

party. The final agreement expires upon the earlier of (i) the effective date of the proposed acquisition, (ii) cancellation of the proposed 

acquisition, or (iii) termination at any time by mutual written consent of the parties.

We record management services revenue as services are provided in accordance with the management services agreements.

Competition

The home health care market is highly fragmented. According to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (“MedPac”), an independent 

agency that advises Congress on various Medicare issues, there were approximately 12,416 Medicare-certified home nursing agencies  

in the United States in 2015. MedPac estimated that in 2015 approximately 17% of Medicare-certified home health agencies provided a 

majority of their services in rural areas, and 78% of agencies were proprietary. We believe we are well positioned to build and maintain 

long-term relationships with local hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers and to become the highest quality post-acute 

provider in our markets. In our experience, because most rural areas do not have the population size to support more than one or two 

general acute care hospitals, the local community hospital often plays a significant role in rural market health care delivery systems. Rural 

patients who require home nursing frequently receive care from a small home care agency or an agency that, while owned and run by  

the local community hospital, is not an area of focus for that hospital. Similarly, patients in these markets who require services typically 

offered by LTACHs are more likely to remain in the community hospital because it is often the only local facility equipped to deal with 

severe and complex medical conditions. We choose to enter these rural markets through affiliations with local hospitals, since we typically 

experience significantly less competition for the services we provide.

05759-LHC.indd   11

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

11

 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

As we expand into new markets, we may encounter competitors that have greater resources or greater access to capital. Generally, 

competition in our home health service markets comes from small local and regional providers. These providers include facility- and 

hospital-based providers, visiting nurse associations, and nurse registries. We are unaware of any competitor offering our breadth of 

services and focusing on the needs of rural markets.

We believe our diverse service offerings, collaborative approach to working with health care providers, business experience gained from 

focusing on rural markets and patient-oriented operating model provide our principal competitive advantages over local providers.

Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement

The LHC Group Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Department, overseen by our Chief Clinical Officer, is responsible for 

formulating quality of care indicators, identifying performance improvement priorities, and facilitating best practices for quality care. 

Company-wide, we have adopted a “Plan, Do, Check, Act” methodology for our quality/performance improvement activities and initiatives. 

We also set forth a quality platform that reviews:

•  performance improvement audits,

•  Joint Commission accreditation,

•  state and regulatory surveys,

•  publicly reported quality data, and

•  patient perception of care.

The Quality Department is also responsible for ensuring that the infrastructure of the quality initiatives throughout the Company is 

appropriate, overseeing and evaluating the effectiveness of the quality plans and initiatives, and recommending appropriate quality and 

performance improvement initiatives.

The Clinical Quality Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for advising our clinical leadership, monitoring the performance of 

our locations based on internal and external benchmarks, overseeing and evaluating the effectiveness of the performance improvement  

and quality plans, facilitating best practices based on internal and external comparisons, and fostering enhanced awareness of clinical 

performance by the Board of Directors.

As part of our ongoing quality control, internal auditing, and monitoring programs, we conduct internal regulatory audits and mock surveys 

at each of our agencies and facilities at least once a year. If an agency or facility does not achieve a satisfactory rating, we require that  

it prepare and implement a plan of correction. We then follow-up to verify that all deficiencies identified in the initial audit and survey have 

been corrected.

As required under the Medicare conditions of participation, we maintain a continuous quality improvement program, which involves:

•  ongoing education of staff and quarterly continuous quality improvement meetings at each of our agencies, facilities and principal 

executive offices,

•  monthly comprehensive audits of patient charts performed at each of our agencies and facilities,

•  at least annually, a comprehensive survey readiness assessment on each of our agencies and facilities,

•  review of Home Health Compare scores,

•  assessment of patients’ and/or family members’ perception of care using third party data, and

•  assessment of infection control practices and risk events.

We constantly expand and refine our continuous quality improvement programs. Specific written policies, procedures, training, and 

educational materials and programs, as well as auditing and monitoring activities, have been prepared and implemented to address the 

functional and operational aspects of our business. Our programs also address specific areas identified for improvement through 

regulatory interpretation and enforcement activities. We believe our consistent focus on continuous quality improvement programs provide 

us with a competitive advantage in the markets we serve.

12

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   12

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

In December 2014, CMS introduced the Five-Star Quality Rating System to help consumers, their families, and the caregivers compare 

home health agencies more easily. The Five-Star Quality Rating System gives each home health agency a rating of between one and five 

based upon a number of quality measures associated with such agency, such as timely initiation of care, medication education provided 

to patients/caregivers, improvements in ambulation, bed transferring, and bathing, and acute care hospitalization, among others.

The Quality of Patient Care Start Ratings were first published in July 2015, and are updated quarterly thereafter based upon new data that 

is published with the ratings on the “Home Health Compare” section of the medicare.gov website. While we are pleased with the ratings 

received by our home health agencies, we continue to strive to improve our results. As of December 31, 2017, 98% of our 318 home 

health agencies were rated 4 stars or greater.

Compliance

We have established and continually maintain a comprehensive compliance and ethics program that is designed to assist all of our 

employees to exceed applicable standards established by federal and state laws and regulations and industry practice. Our goal is to 

foster and maintain the highest standards of compliance, ethics, integrity, and professionalism in every aspect of our business dealings, 

and we utilize our compliance and ethics program to assist our employees toward achieving that goal.

The purpose of our compliance and ethics program is to promote and foster compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, 

the requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid programs and other government healthcare programs, industry standards, our Code  

of Conduct and Ethics, and our other policies and procedures that support and enhance overall compliance within our Company. Our 

compliance and ethics program focuses on regulations related to the federal False Claims Act, the Stark Law, the federal Anti-Kickback 

Law, billing and overall adherence to health care regulations.

To ensure the independence of our compliance department staff, we have implemented the following:

•  our Chief Compliance Officer reports to and has direct oversight by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,

•  our compliance department has its own operating budget, and

•  our compliance department has the authority to independently investigate any compliance or ethical concerns, including, when 

deemed necessary, the authority to interview any company personnel, access any company property (including electronic 

communications) and engage counsel to assist in any investigation.

Among other activities, our compliance department staff is responsible for the following activities:

•  drafting and revising the Company’s policies and procedures related to compliance and ethics issues,

•  reviewing, making recommended revisions, disseminating and tracking attestations to our Code of Conduct and Ethics,

•  measuring compliance with our policies and procedures, Code of Conduct and Ethics and legal and regulatory requirements related to 

the Medicare and Medicaid programs and other government healthcare programs, laws and regulations,

•  developing and providing compliance-related training and education to all of our employees and, as appropriate, directors, contractors 

and other representatives and agents, including new-hire compliance training for all new employees, annual compliance training for  

all employees, sales compliance training to all members of our sales team, billing compliance training to all members of our billing and 

revenue cycle team and other job-specific and role-based compliance training of certain employees,

•  performing an annual company-wide risk assessment,

•  implementing an annual compliance auditing and monitoring work plan and performing and following up on various risk-based auditing 

and monitoring activities, including both clinical and non-clinical auditing and monitoring activities at the corporate level and at the local 

agency/facility level,

•  developing, implementing and overseeing our Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) privacy and security 

compliance program,

•  monitoring, responding to and overseeing the resolution of issues and concerns raised through our anonymous compliance hotline,

•  monitoring, responding to and resolving all compliance and ethics-related issues and concerns raised through any other form of 

communication, and

•  ensuring that we take appropriate corrective and disciplinary action when noncompliant or improper conduct is identified.

05759-LHC.indd   13

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

13

LHC GROUP

All employees are required to report incidents, issues or other concerns that they believe in good faith may be in violation of our Code of 

Conduct and Ethics, our policies and procedures, applicable legal and regulatory requirements or the requirements of the Medicare and 

Medicaid programs and other government health care programs. All employees are encouraged to either contact our Chief Compliance 

Officer directly or to contact our 24-hour toll-free compliance hotline when they have questions or concerns about any compliance or 

ethics issues. All reports to our compliance hotline are kept confidential to the extent allowed by law, and employees have the option to 

remain anonymous. When cases reported to our compliance hotline involve a compliance or ethics issue or any possible violation of  

law or regulation, the matter is referred to the compliance department for investigation. Retaliation against employees in connection with 

reporting compliance or ethical concerns is considered a serious violation of our Code of Conduct and Ethics, and, if it occurs, will result 

in discipline, up to and including termination of employment.

We continually expand and refine our compliance and ethics programs. We promote a culture of compliance, ethics, integrity and 

professionalism within the Company through persistent messages from our senior leadership concerning the necessity of strict 

compliance with legal requirements and company policies and procedures. We believe our consistent focus on our compliance and ethics 

program provides us with a competitive advantage in the markets we serve.

On January 4, 2017, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services acknowledged that the Company 

had completed its Corporate Integrity Agreement requirements and the Company has since been removed from the current listing of 

Corporate Integrity Agreements.

Technology and Intellectual Property

Our Service Value Point system is a proprietary information system that assists us in, among other things, monitoring clinical utilization and 

other cost factors, supporting our health care management techniques, internal benchmarking, clinical analysis, outcomes monitoring  

and claims generation, revenue cycle management, and revenue reporting at our home nursing agencies. We were issued a patent for our 

Service Value Point system during 2009 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. This proprietary home nursing clinical resource and  

cost management system is a quantitative tool that assigns a target level of resource units to each patient based upon our staff’s initial 

assessment of the patient’s estimated skilled nursing and therapy needs. We designed this system to empower our direct care 

employees to make appropriate day-to-day clinical care decisions while also allowing us to monitor and manage the quality and delivery  

of care across our system, including the cost of providing that care, on both a patient-specific and agency-specific basis.

As of December 31, 2017, all of our home nursing and hospice locations utilize our point of care (“POC”) system. Our POC system allows  

a visiting clinician to access records and other information from the patient’s home or at the POC, complete required documentation at the 

POC and submit it electronically into our patient record system.

Technology plays a key role in our ability to expand operations and maintain effective managerial control. The software we use is based  

on client-server technology and is highly scalable. We believe our software and systems are flexible, easy-to-use and allow us to 

accommodate further growth. We believe that our ability to build and enhance our information and software systems provides us with a 

competitive advantage that allows us to grow our business in a cost-efficient manner and provide better patient care.

Reimbursement

Medicare

The federal government’s Medicare program, governed by the Social Security Act of 1965 (the “Social Security Act”), reimburses health 

care providers for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. These beneficiaries generally include persons age 65 and older and those 

who are chronically disabled. The program is primarily administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”). Medicare payments accounted for 71.0%, 74.5% and 74.5% of our net service 

revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Medicare reimburses us based upon the setting in which 

we provide our services or the Medicare category in which those services fall.

In 2011, sequestration was implemented in the Budget Control Act of 2011(BCA, P.L. 112-25) as a tool in federal budget control. The 

sequestration cut to Medicare payments began on April 1, 2013, and reduced Medicare payments for patients whose service dates 

ended on or after April 1, 2013 by 2%. Absent any additional Congressional action, the 2% sequestration cuts are planned to continue 

through 2023.

14

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   14

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Home Health

The Medicare home nursing benefit is available to patients who need care following discharge from a hospital, as well as patients who 

suffer from chronic conditions that require skilled intermittent care. While the services received need not be rehabilitative or of a finite 

duration, patients who require full-time skilled nursing for an extended period of time generally do not qualify for Medicare home nursing 

benefits. As a condition of coverage under Medicare, beneficiaries must: (1) be homebound, meaning they are unable to leave their 

home without a considerable and taxing effort; (2) require intermittent skilled nursing, physical therapy or speech therapy services that are 

covered by Medicare; and (3) receive treatment under a plan of care that is established and periodically reviewed by a physician. 

Qualifying patients also may receive reimbursement for occupational therapy, medical social services, and home health aide services if 

these additional services are part of a plan of care prescribed by a physician.

We receive a standard prospective Medicare payment for delivering care over a 60-day episode of care. There is no limit to the number of 

episodes a beneficiary may receive as long as he or she remains eligible. The base episode payment is a flat rate that is adjusted upward 

or downward based upon differences in the expected resource needs of individual patients as indicated by clinical severity, functional 

severity and service utilization. The magnitude of the adjustment is determined by each patient’s categorization into one of 153 payment 

groups, known as Home Health Resource Groups and the costliness of care for patients in each group relative to the average patient. 

Payment is further adjusted for differences in local labor costs using the hospital wage index. We bill and are reimbursed for services in 

two stages: an initial request for advance payment when the episode commences and a final claim when the episode is completed. We 

submit all Medicare claims through the Medicare Administrative Contractors for the federal government. We receive 60% of the estimated 

payment for a patient’s initial episode up-front (after the initial assessment is completed and upon initial billing) and the remaining  

40% upon completion of the episode and after all final treatment orders are signed by the physician. In the event of subsequent episodes, 

reimbursement timing is 50% up-front and 50% upon completion of the episode. Final payments may reflect base payment adjustments  

for case-mix and geographic wage differences and 2% sequestration reduction for episodes beginning after March 31, 2013. In addition, 

final adjustments may reflect one of four retroactive adjustments to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the total reimbursement:  

(a) an outlier payment if the patient’s care was unusually costly; (b) a low utilization adjustment if the number of visits was fewer than  

five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another provider or transferred from another provider before completing the  

episode; (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy services required. Because such adjustments are determined upon  

the completion date of the episode, retroactive adjustments could impact our financial results.

In 2011, CMS finalized two provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the PPACA”) that substantially impact our 

business. First, as a condition for Medicare payment, the PPACA mandates that prior to certifying a patient’s eligibility for home health 

services, the certifying physician must document that he or she, or allowed non-physician practitioner, had a face-to-face encounter with 

the patient that relates to the condition for which the patient receives home health services. The face-to-face encounter must occur 

within 90 days prior to the start of care or 30 days after the start of care. Documentation regarding these encounters must be present in 

the patient’s home health medical record. In 2015, documentation supporting these encounters must be in the certifying physician’s or 

hospital medical record.

Beginning in 2015, CMS also made important changes to therapy assessment requirements. A professional qualified therapist 

assessment must take place at least once every 30 days during a therapy patient’s course of treatment.

We verify a patient’s eligibility for home health benefits at the time of admission. Through the verification process we are able to determine 

the payor source and eligibility for reimbursement of each patient. Accordingly, we do not have material amounts of reimbursements 

pending approval based on the eligibility of a patient to receive reimbursement from the applicable payor program. Further, we provide 

only limited services to patients who are ineligible for reimbursement from a third party payor. Therefore, we do not have any material 

amounts of reimbursements due from patients who are self-pay.

The base payment rate for Medicare home nursing was $2,989.97 per 60-day episode for the year ended December 31, 2017. The base 

payment rate does not take into consideration the 2% sequestration payment reduction mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011.

Home health payment rates are updated annually by the home health market basket percentage as adjusted by Congress. CMS 

establishes the home health market basket index, which measures inflation in the prices of an appropriate mix of goods and services 

included in home health services.

05759-LHC.indd   15

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

15

LHC GROUP

Effects of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 on Home Health

On February 9, 2018, President Trump signed into law the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (the “BBA 2018”), which included the following 

provisions impacting our home health business:

•  A new case mix model

•  Mandates the development of a new case mix model in a transparent process involving Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

(“CMS”), the home health industry, and the Congressional committees of jurisdiction.

•  The new model will use a 30-day payment period (leaving intact the 60-day assessment and order process), and must be 

implemented in a budget-neutral manner beginning in 2020 and will not include the use of therapy visits as a determinant. 

Congressional Budget Office (“CBO”) scored this at zero savings and zero cost due to the budget-neutrality requirement.

•  CMS is specifically instructed to consider the use of alternative payment reform recommendations like the “Risk Based Grouper 

Model” proposed in lieu of the Home Health Groupings Model (“HHGM”) proposed in the preliminary rule.

•  The new model must be developed on a budget-neutral basis as opposed to the HHGM, which was proposed on a non-budget-

neutral basis in the preliminary rule. Further, any behavioral adjustments must now be transparent and subject to public notice, 

comment, and the rule-making process. The HHGM, as proposed, footnoted a reference to behavioral adjustments that were not 

defined and not transparent in its underlying assumptions period in 2017.

•  Restoration of the 3% rural add-on

•  Restores the 3% home health rate add-on for home health patients who reside in rural geographies, effective January 1, 2018. 

The add-on rate will be phased downward over a five-year period following a formula specified in the legislation.

•  Restores an important protection of access to Medicare home health care for rural America, and provides sufficient time for the 

industry to produce additional compelling evidence to demonstrate the positive impact of the rural add-on payment to rural 

Medicare beneficiaries.

•  Since its inception, the rural rate has been repeatedly renewed by Congress in recognition of the continued need.

•  Face-to-face documentation improvements allowing the home health medical record in its entirety to be used in support of the 

physician’s attestation of medical necessity.

•  A study is to be conducted by the GAO (Government Accounting Office) on Medicare improvements to address the needs of the 

chronically ill through healthcare services provided at home, including interdisciplinary care management, tele-health, and tele-

monitoring for Medicare Advantage plans, requiring states to better integrate Medicare and Medicaid services for the dually-eligible, 

and the extension and expansion of the Independence at Home Demonstration Program.

•  A specific market basket update percentage of 1.5% for fiscal year 2020, leaving intact the full market basket update (generally 

expected to be between 2-3%) for fiscal year 2019. Suspends the productivity adjustment in 2020.

•  Repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, effective upon passage.

•  Payment rate feasibility study to be conducted concerning the feasibility of a higher payment rate for providers, including home health 

providers that engage in the management of patients’ chronic conditions.

Hospice

In order for a Medicare beneficiary to qualify for the Medicare hospice benefit, two physicians must certify that, in their clinical judgment, 

the beneficiary has less than six months to live, assuming the beneficiary’s disease runs its normal course. In addition, the Medicare 

beneficiary must affirmatively elect hospice care and waive any rights to other Medicare curative benefits related to his or her terminal 

illness. At the end of each benefit period (described below), a physician must recertify that the Medicare beneficiary’s life expectancy is six 

months or less in order for the beneficiary to continue to qualify for and to receive the Medicare hospice benefit. The first two benefit 

periods are 90 days and subsequent benefit periods are 60 days. A Medicare beneficiary may revoke his or her election at any time and 

resume receiving traditional Medicare benefits. There is no limit on how long a Medicare beneficiary can receive hospice benefits and 

services, provided that the beneficiary continues to meet Medicare hospice eligibility criteria.

16

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   16

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Medicare reimburses for hospice care using one of four predetermined daily rates based upon the level of care we furnish to a beneficiary. 

These rates are subject to annual adjustments based on inflation and geographic wage considerations. The base Medicare rate for services 

that we provide to a beneficiary depends upon which of the following four levels of care we provide to that beneficiary:

•  Routine Care. Care that is not classified under any of the other levels of care, such as the work of nurses, social workers or home 

health aides.

•  General Inpatient Care. Pain control or acute or chronic symptom management that cannot be managed in a setting other than an 

inpatient Medicare certified facility, such as a hospital, skilled nursing facility or hospice inpatient facility.

•  Continuous Home Care. Care for patients experiencing a medical crisis that requires nursing services to achieve palliation and 

symptom control, if the agency provides a minimum of eight hours of care within a 24-hour period.

•  Respite Care. Short-term, inpatient care to give temporary relief to the caregiver who regularly provides care to the patient.

Medicare limits the reimbursement we may receive for inpatient care services (both respite and general care) for hospice patients. Under 

the “80-20 rule,” if the number of inpatient care days of hospice care furnished by us to Medicare hospice beneficiaries under a unique 

provider number exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care furnished by us to all Medicare hospice beneficiaries for both inpatient 

and in-home care, Medicare payments to us for inpatient care days exceeding the inpatient cap will be reduced to the routine home  

care rate, with excess amounts due back to Medicare. This determination is made annually based on the twelve-month period beginning 

on November 1 each year. Our Medicare hospice reimbursement is also subject to a cap amount calculated at the end of the hospice  

cap period, based on the twelve-month period beginning on November 1 each year, which determines the maximum allowable payments 

per provider.

In 2011, CMS finalized a face-to-face encounter requirement for hospice reimbursement, mandating that a physician or qualifying  

nurse practitioner must certify a face-to-face encounter with the patient no later than the 30-day period prior to the 180th-day 

recertification (beginning of the third benefit period) and each subsequent recertification in order to gather clinical findings that support 

continued hospice care.

Effective January 1, 2017, hospices will be reimbursed at a higher routine home care rate ($190.55) for days 1 through 60 of a hospice 

episode of care and a lower rate ($149.82) for days 61 and beyond of a hospice episode of care. In this rule, CMS also provided for a 

Service Intensity Add-on increasing payments for routine home care services provided directly by registered nurses and social workers to 

hospice patients during the final seven days of life.

Effects of BBA 2018 on Hospice

The BBA 2018 included the following provisions impacting our hospice business:

•  Hospice included in Hospital Post-Acute Transfer Policy for early discharges to hospice care. Hospice will be included as a post-acute 

service subject to the transfer DRG policy, in which acute-care hospitals receive a reduction in payments if they transfer a patient to 

post-acute care prior to achieving the mean length of stay for the DRG. Currently, home health, skilled nursing facilities, and LTACHs 

are included within the policy, and the BBA 2018 adds hospice as a post-acute provider subject to the policy.

•  Physician Assistants recognized as attending physicians to serve hospice patients, effective January 1, 2019.

Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals

All Medicare payments to our LTACHs are made in accordance with a PPS specifically applicable to LTACHs, referred to as “LTACH-PPS.” 

The LTACH-PPS was established by CMS final regulations published in 2002, that require each patient discharged from an LTACH to  

be assigned a distinct long-term care diagnosis-related group (“MS-LTC-DRG”), which take into account (among other things) the severity 

of a patient’s condition. Our LTACHs are paid a predetermined fixed amount based upon the assigned MS-LTC-DRG (adjusted for area 

wage differences), which includes adjustments for short stay and high cost outlier patients (described in further detail below). The payment 

amount for each MS-LTC-DRG classification is intended to reflect the average cost of treating a Medicare patient assigned to that 

MS-LTC-DRG in an LTACH.

05759-LHC.indd   17

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

17

LHC GROUP

Adjustments to MS-LTC-DRG payments might include:

•  Short Stay Outlier Policy. CMS has established a modified payment methodology for Medicare patients with a length-of-stay less than 

or equal to five-sixths of the geometric average length-of-stay for that particular MS-LTC-DRG, referred to as a short stay outlier, or 

“SSO.” When LTACH-PPS was established, SSO cases were paid based on the lesser of (1) 120% of the average cost of the case; 

(2) 120% of the LTC-DRG specific per diem amount multiplied by the patient’s length-of-stay; or (3) the full LTC-DRG payment.  

CMS modified the payment methodology for discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, which changed the limitation in clause  

(1) above to reduce payment for SSO cases to 100% (rather than 120%) of the average cost of the case, and also added a fourth 

limitation, potentially further limiting payment for SSO cases at a per diem rate derived from blending 120% of the MS-LTC-DRG 

specific per diem amount with a per diem rate based on the general acute care hospital inpatient prospective payment system, or 

“IPPS.” Under this methodology, as a patient’s length-of-stay increases, the percentage of the per diem amount based upon the  

IPPS component will decrease and the percentage based on the MS-LTC-DRG component will increase.

•  High Cost Outliers. Some cases are extraordinarily costly, producing losses that may be too large for healthcare providers to offset. 

Cases with unusually high costs, referred to as “high cost outliers,” receive a payment adjustment to reflect the additional resources 

utilized. CMS provides an additional payment if the estimated costs for the patient exceed the adjusted MS-LTC-DRG payment plus a 

fixed-loss amount that is established in the annual payment rate update.

•  Interrupted Stays. An interrupted stay occurs when an LTACH patient is admitted upon discharge to a general acute care hospital, 

inpatient rehab facility (“IRF”), skilled nursing facility or a swing-bed hospital and returns to the same LTACH within a specified period of 

time. If the length-of-stay at the receiving provider is equal to or less than the applicable fixed period of time, it is considered to be an 

interrupted stay case and is treated as a single discharge for the purposes of payment to the LTACH.

Freestanding, HwH and Satellite LTACHs

LTACHs may be organized and operated as freestanding facilities or as a hospital within a hospital, or “HwH.” An HwH is an LTACH that is 

located on the “campus” of another hospital, meaning the physical area immediately adjacent to a hospital’s main buildings, other areas 

and structures that are not strictly contiguous to a hospital’s main buildings but are located within 250 yards of its main buildings, and any 

other determined, on an individual case basis by the applicable CMS regional office, to be part of a hospital’s campus. An LTACH that 

uses the same Medicare provider number of an affiliated “primary site” LTACH is known as a “satellite.” Under Medicare policy, a satellite 

LTACH must be located within 35 miles of its primary site LTACH and be administered by such primary site LTACH. As of December 31, 

2017, we had a total of 15 LTACH facilities, with 353 licensed beds. Fourteen of our LTACH facilities were classified as HwHs and one was 

classified as freestanding. Of the fifteen facilities, ten were located in Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”) or urban areas and five were 

located in non-MSA or rural areas. One of our HwH facilities was a satellite location of a parent hospital located in an MSA. Our single 

freestanding location was a remote campus site of a parent located in an MSA.

An LTACH must have an average inpatient length-of-stay for Medicare patients (including both Medicare covered and non-covered days) 

of greater than 25 days during each annual cost reporting period. LTACHs that fail to exceed an average length-of-stay of 25 days during 

any cost reporting period may be paid under the general acute care hospital IPPS. CMS clarified its policy on the calculation of the 

average length-of-stay by specifying that all data on all Medicare inpatient days, including Medicare Advantage days, must be included in 

the average length-of-stay calculation effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012.

Fiscal Year 2018 Rates

On August 2, 2017, CMS posted a display copy of its final rule for the annual update to Medicare payment rates and policies for the 

Fiscal Year 2018 inpatient hospitals prospective payment system and the LTACH PPS. CMS estimates the impact of the proposed rule will 

result in a 2.4% overall reduction in LTACH spending. The LTACH standard federal rate is reduced to $41,430.56 from $42,476.41.  

CMS is also proposing a 12 month administrative moratorium on application of the 25 Percent Rule beginning with the expiration of the 

statutory moratorium after September 30, 2017. The 25 Percent Rule will not be applied to LTACHs for discharges occurring on or 

before September 30, 2018. CMS also adopted certain adjustments to high cost outlier and short stay outlier policies. CMS finalized its 

proposal for a new severe wound exception to be paid at standard Federal LTACH rates instead of site neutral payments for grandfathered 

LTACHs. CMS changed the separateness and control restrictions for certain co-located IPPS-exempt hospitals. The Final Rule also  

adds three new quality measures and discontinues two quality measures. CMS also finalized its proposal to implement collection of 

standardized patient assessment data under the IMPACT Act on functional status, cognitive function, cancer treatments, respiratory 

treatments, transfusions and other special services effective for admissions on/after April 1, 2019.

18

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   18

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Effects of BBA 2018 on LTACHS

The impact of BBA 2018 on our LTACH business includes a two-year extension of site-neutral blended payments rates for certain 

long-term care hospital discharges, based upon a 4.6% reduction in site-neutral payments over 7 years.

Medicaid

Medicaid is a joint federal and state funded health insurance program for certain low-income individuals administered by the states. 

Medicaid reimburses health care providers using a number of different systems, including cost-based, prospective payment and 

negotiated rate systems. Rates are also subject to adjustment based on statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, 

government funding limitations and interpretations of policy by individual state agencies.

Non-Governmental Payors

Payments from non-governmental payor sources are based on episodic-based rates or per visit based rates depending upon the terms 

and conditions of the payor. This reimbursement category includes payors such as insurance companies, workers’ compensation 

programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other managed care companies and employers, as well  

as payments received directly from patients.

Patients are generally not responsible for any difference between customary charges for our services and amounts paid by Medicare  

and Medicaid programs and the non-governmental payors, but are responsible for services not covered by these programs or plans, as  

well as co-payments for deductibles and co-insurance obligations of their coverage. Patient out-of-pocket costs for the payment of 

deductibles and co-insurance have increased in recent years. Collection of amounts due from individuals is typically more difficult than 

collection of amounts due from government or business payors. Because the majority of our billed services are paid in full by Medicare, 

Medicaid or private insurance, co-payments from patients do not represent a material portion of our billed revenue and corresponding 

accounts receivable. To further reduce their health care costs, most commercial payors such as insurance companies, health maintenance 

organizations, preferred provider organizations and other managed care companies have negotiated discounted fee structures or fixed 

amounts for services performed, rather than paying health care providers the amounts normally billed.

In response to the challenges associated with collecting from commercial payors, we began negotiating higher reimbursement rates  

with a majority of our commercial payors. As of December 31, 2017, our managed care contracts included 182 different payors between 

all of our divisions. If we are unable to continue negotiating higher reimbursement rates with commercial payors or if commercial payors 

continue to reduce health care costs through reduction in home health reimbursement, it could have a material adverse impact on our 

financial results.

Government Regulations

General

The health care industry is highly regulated and we are required to comply with federal, state and local laws which significantly affect our 

business. These laws and regulations are extremely complex and, in many instances, the industry does not have the benefit of significant 

regulatory or judicial interpretation. Regulations and policies frequently change, and we monitor these changes through trade and 

governmental publications and associations. The significant areas of federal and state regulation that could affect our ability to conduct 

our business include the following:

•  Medicare and Medicaid participation and reimbursement regulations;

•  the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state laws;

•  the federal Stark Law and similar state laws;

•  false claims laws and regulations;

•  HIPAA;

•  laws and regulations imposing civil monetary penalties;

•  environmental health and safety laws;

•  licensing laws and regulations; and

•  laws and regulations governing certificates of need and permits of approval.

05759-LHC.indd   19

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

19

LHC GROUP

If we fail to comply with these applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses 

to operate and our ability to participate in federal and state health care programs, which would materially adversely affect our financial 

condition and results of operations. Although we believe we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, these are 

complex matters and a review of our practices by a court or law enforcement or regulatory authority could result in an adverse 

determination that could harm our business. Furthermore, the laws applicable to us are subject to change, interpretation and amendment, 

which could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

Medicare Participation

To participate in the Medicare program and receive Medicare payments, our agencies and facilities must comply with regulations 

promulgated by CMS. Among other things, these requirements, known as “conditions of participation,” relate to the type of facility,  

its personnel and its standards of medical care. While we intend to continue to participate in the Medicare reimbursement programs,  

we cannot guarantee that our agencies, facilities and programs will continue to qualify for Medicare participation.

Federal Anti-Kickback Statute

Provisions of the Social Security Act of 1965, commonly referred to as the Anti-Kickback Statute, prohibit the payment or receipt of 

anything of value in return for the referral of patients or arranging for the referral of patients, or in return for the recommendation, 

arrangement, purchase, lease or order of items or services that are covered by a federal health care program such as Medicare and 

Medicaid. Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a felony and sanctions include imprisonment of up to five years, criminal fines of  

up to $25,000, civil monetary penalties of up to $50,000 per act plus three times the amount claimed or three times the remuneration 

offered and exclusion from federal health care programs (including the Medicare and Medicaid programs). Many states have adopted 

similar prohibitions against payments intended to induce referrals of Medicaid and other third-party payor patients.

The OIG has published numerous “safe harbors” that exempt some practices from enforcement action under the Anti-Kickback Statute. 

These safe harbors exempt specified activities, including bona-fide employment relationships, contracts for the rental of space or 

equipment, personal service arrangements and management contracts, so long as all of the requirements of the safe harbor are met. The 

OIG has recognized that the failure of an arrangement to satisfy all of the requirements of a particular safe harbor does not necessarily 

mean that the arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, each arrangement is analyzed on a case-by-case basis, which is 

very fact specific. While we operate our business to comply with the prohibitions of the Anti-Kickback Statute, we cannot guarantee that 

all our arrangements will satisfy a safe harbor or will ultimately be viewed as being compliant with the Anti-Kickback Statute.

We endeavor to conduct our operations in compliance with federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws, including the Anti-Kickback 

Statute and similar state laws. However, our practices may be challenged in the future and the fraud and abuse laws may be interpreted  

in a way that finds us in violation of these laws. If we are found to be in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute, we could be subject to civil 

and criminal penalties and we could be excluded from participating in federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.  

The occurrence of any of these events could significantly harm our business and financial condition.

Stark Law

Congress has passed significant prohibitions against physician self-referrals of patients for certain designated health care services, 

commonly known as the Stark Law, which prohibits a physician from making referrals for particular health care services (called designated 

health services) to entities with which the physician, or an immediate family member of the physician, has a financial relationship.

The term “financial relationship” is defined very broadly to include most types of ownership or compensation relationships. The Stark Law 

defines a financial relationship to include: (1) a physician’s ownership or investment interest in an entity and (2) a compensation relationship 

between a physician and an entity. Under the Stark Law, financial relationships include both direct and indirect relationships. The Stark 

Law also prohibits the entity receiving the referral from seeking payment under the Medicare or Medicaid programs for services rendered 

pursuant to a prohibited referral. If an entity is paid for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral, it may incur civil penalties and 

could be excluded from participating in the Medicare or Medicaid programs. If an arrangement is covered by the Stark Law, the 

requirements of a Stark Law exception must be met for the physician to be able to make referrals to the entity for designated health 

services and for the entity to be able to bill for these services.

20

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   20

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

“Designated health services” under the Stark Law is defined to include home health services, inpatient and outpatient hospital services, 

clinical laboratory services, physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, radiology services (including magnetic resonance 

imaging, computerized axial tomography scans and ultrasound services), radiation therapy services and supplies, and the provision of 

durable medical equipment and supplies, parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment and supplies, prosthetics, orthotics and prosthetic 

devices and supplies, and outpatient prescription drugs.

Physicians refer patients to us for several Stark Law designated health services, including home health services, inpatient and outpatient 

hospital services and physical therapy services. We have compensation arrangements with some of these physicians or their professional 

practices in the form of medical director and consulting agreements. We also have operations owned by joint ventures in which 

physicians have an investment interest. In addition, other physicians who refer patients to our agencies and facilities may own shares of 

our stock. As a result of these relationships, we could be deemed to have a financial relationship with physicians who refer patients to  

our facilities and agencies for designated health services. If so, the Stark Law would prohibit the physicians from making those referrals 

and would prohibit us from billing for the services unless a Stark Law exception applies.

The Stark Law contains exceptions for certain physician ownership or investment interests and physician compensation arrangements.  

If an investment relationship or compensation agreement between a physician, or a physician’s immediate family member, and the subject 

entity satisfies all requirements for a Stark Law exception, the Stark Law will not prohibit the physician from referring patients to the 

entity for designated health services. The exceptions for a physician investment relationship include ownership in an entire hospital and 

ownership in rural providers. The exceptions for compensation arrangements cover employment relationships, personal services 

contracts and space and equipment leases, among others. We believe our physician investment relationships and compensation 

arrangements with referring physicians meet the requirements as exceptions under the Stark Law and that our operations comply with  

the Stark Law.

The Stark Law also includes an exception for a physician’s ownership or investment interest in certain entities through the ownership of 

stock that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ. If the ownership meets certain other requirements, the Stark Law  

will not apply to prohibit the physician from referring to the entity for designated health services. For example, this Stark Law exception 

requires that the entity issuing the stock have at least $75.0 million in stockholders’ equity at the end of its most recent fiscal year  

or on average during the previous three fiscal years. As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we have in excess of $75.0 million in 

stockholders’ equity.

If an entity violates the Stark Law, it could be subject to civil penalties of up to $15,000 per prohibited claim and up to $100,000 for 

knowingly entering into certain prohibited referral schemes. The entity also may be excluded from participating in federal health care 

programs (including Medicare and Medicaid). There are no criminal penalties for violations of Stark Law. If the Stark Law was found  

to apply to our relationships with referring physicians and those relationships did not meet the requirement of an exception under the 

Stark Law, we would be required to restructure these relationships or refuse to accept referrals for designated health services from these 

physicians. If we were found to have submitted claims to Medicare or Medicaid for services provided pursuant to a referral prohibited  

by the Stark Law, we would be required to repay any amounts we received from Medicare for those services and could be subject to civil 

monetary penalties. Further, we could be excluded from participating in Medicare and Medicaid. If we were required to repay any 

amounts to Medicare, subjected to fines, or excluded from the Medicare and Medicaid Programs, our business and financial condition 

would be harmed significantly.

Many states have physician relationship and referral statutes that are similar to the Stark Law. Some of these laws generally apply without 

regard to whether the payor is a governmental body (such as Medicare) or a commercial party (such as an insurance company). While  

we believe that our operations are structured to comply with applicable state laws with respect to physician relationships and referrals, any 

finding that we are not in compliance with these state laws could require us to change our operations or could subject us to penalties. 

This, in turn, could have a significantly negative impact on our operations.

05759-LHC.indd   21

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

21

LHC GROUP

False Claims

The submission of claims to a federal or state health care program for items and services that are “not provided as claimed” may lead to 

the imposition of civil monetary penalties, criminal fines and imprisonment and/or exclusion from participation in state and federally funded 

health care programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, under false claims statutes such as the federal False Claims Act. 

Under the federal False Claims Act, actions against a provider can be initiated by the federal government or by a private party on behalf of 

the federal government. These private parties are often referred to as qui tam relators, and relators are entitled to share in any amounts 

recovered by the government. Both direct enforcement activity by the government and qui tam actions have increased significantly in 

recent years, increasing the risk that a health care company like us will have to defend a false claims action, pay fines or be excluded from 

the Medicare and Medicaid programs as a result of an investigation. Many states have enacted similar laws providing for the imposition  

of civil and criminal penalties for the filing of fraudulent claims. While we operate our business to avoid exposure under the federal False 

Claims Act and similar state laws, because of the complexity of the government regulations applicable to our industry, we cannot 

guarantee that we will not be the subject of an action under the federal False Claims Act or similar state law.

Anti-fraud Provisions of the HIPAA

In an effort to combat health care fraud, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in HIPAA. Among other things, HIPAA broadened 

the scope of certain fraud and abuse laws, extended criminal penalties for Medicare and Medicaid fraud to other federal health care 

programs and expanded the authority of the OIG to exclude persons and entities from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. 

HIPAA also extended the Medicare and Medicaid civil monetary penalty provisions to other federal health care programs, increased the 

amounts of civil monetary penalties and established a criminal health care fraud statute.

Federal health care offenses under HIPAA include health care fraud and making false statements relating to health care matters. Under 

HIPAA, among other things, any person or entity that knowingly and willfully defrauds or attempts to defraud a health care benefit program 

is subject to a fine, imprisonment or both. Also under HIPAA, any person or entity that knowingly and willfully falsifies or conceals or covers 

up a material fact or makes any materially false or fraudulent statements in connection with the delivery of or payment of health care 

services by a health care benefit plan is subject to a fine, imprisonment or both. HIPAA applies not only to governmental plans but also to 

private payors.

Administrative Simplification Provisions of HIPAA

HHS’s final regulations governing electronic transactions involving health information are part of the administrative simplification provisions 

of HIPAA, commonly referred to as the Transaction Standards rule. The rule establishes standards for eight of the most common health 

care transactions by reference to technical standards promulgated by recognized standards publishing organizations. Under the rule, any 

party transmitting or receiving health transactions electronically must send and receive data in a single format, rather than the large 

number of different data formats currently used. This rule applies to us in connection with submitting and processing health claims, and 

also applies to many of our payors and to our relationships with those payors. We believe that our operations materially comply with the 

Transaction Standards rule.

These regulatory requirements impose significant administrative and financial obligations on companies like us that use or disclose 

electronic health information. We have modified our existing HIPAA privacy and security policies and procedures to comply with the 

HIPAA regulations.

Civil Monetary Penalties

The Secretary of HHS may impose civil monetary penalties on any person or entity that presents, or causes to be presented, certain 

ineligible claims for medical items or services. The severity of penalties varies depending on the offense, from $2,000 to $50,000 per 

violation, plus treble damages for the amount at issue and may include exclusion from federal health care programs such as Medicare  

and Medicaid.

HHS can also impose penalties on a person or entity who offers inducements to beneficiaries for program services, who violates rules 

regarding the assignment of payments, or who knowingly gives false or misleading information that could reasonably influence the 

discharge of patients from a hospital. Persons who have been excluded from a federal health care program and who retain ownership in  

a participating entity as well as persons who contract with excluded persons may be penalized.

22

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   22

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

HHS can also impose penalties for false or fraudulent claims and those that include services not provided as claimed. In addition,  

HHS may impose penalties on claims:

•  for physician services that the person or entity knew or should have known were rendered by a person who was unlicensed, or by a 

person who misrepresented either their qualifications in obtaining their license or their certification in a medical specialty;

•  for services furnished by a person who was, at the time the claim was made, excluded from the program to which the claim was made; or

•  that show a pattern of medically unnecessary items or services.

Penalties also are applicable in certain other cases, including violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, payments to limit certain 

patient services and improper execution of statements of medical necessity.

Governmental Review, Audits, and Investigations

CMS, DOJ, and other federal and state agencies continue to impose intensive enforcement policies and conduct random and directed 

audits, reviews, and investigations designed to insure compliance with applicable healthcare program participation and payment laws and 

regulations. As a result, we are routinely the subject of such audits, reviews, and investigations.

In addition, CMS has engaged a number of third party firms, including Zone Program Integrity Contractors (“ZPICs”) and Recovery  

Audit Contractors (“RACs”) to conduct extensive reviews of claims data and state and Federal Government health care program laws 

and regulations applicable to healthcare providers. These audits evaluate the appropriateness of billings submitted for payment. Audit 

contractors identify overpayments resulting from incorrect payment amounts, non-covered services, medically unnecessary services, 

incorrectly coded services, and duplicate services, and are paid on a contingency basis. In addition to identifying overpayments, audit 

contractors can refer suspected violations of law to government enforcement authorities.

We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any regulatory and other governmental and internal audits and investigations. While such 

audits and investigations are the subject of administrative appeals, the appeals process, even if successful, may take several years to 

resolve. The Company’s costs to respond to and defend any such audits, reviews and investigations could be significant and are likely to 

increase in the current enforcement environment.

The Department of Justice, CMS, or other federal and state enforcement and regulatory agencies may conduct additional investigations 

related to the Company’s businesses in the future. These audits and investigations have caused and could potentially continue to cause 

delays in collections, recoupments, retroactive adjustment to amounts previously paid from governmental payors. Currently, the Company 

has recorded $16.9 million in other assets, which are from government payors related to the disputed finding of pending ZPIC audits. 

Additionally, these audits may subject the Company to sanctions, damages, extrapolation of damage findings, additional recoupments, 

fines, and other penalties (some of which may not be covered by insurance), termination from the Medicare and Medicaid programs,  

bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, any of which may, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material 

adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition.

Environmental, Health, and Safety Laws

We are subject to federal, state, and local regulations governing the storage, use, and disposal of materials and waste products. Although 

we believe that our safety procedures for storing, handling, and disposing of these hazardous materials comply with the standards 

prescribed by law and regulation, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from those hazardous 

materials. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for any damages that result, and any liability could exceed the limits or fall 

outside the coverage of our insurance. We may not be able to maintain insurance on acceptable terms, or at all. We could incur significant 

costs and the diversion of our management’s attention to comply with current or future environmental laws and regulations. We are not 

aware of any violations related to compliance with environmental, health and safety laws through 2017.

Licensing

Our agencies and facilities are subject to state and local licensing regulations ranging from the adequacy of medical care to compliance 

with building codes and environmental protection laws. To assure continued compliance with these various regulations, governmental  

and other authorities periodically inspect our agencies and facilities. Additionally, health care professionals at our agencies and facilities are 

required to be individually licensed or certified under applicable state law. We operate our business to ensure that our employees and 

agents possess all necessary licenses and certifications.

05759-LHC.indd   23

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

23

LHC GROUP

The institutional pharmacy operations within our facility-based services segment are also subject to regulation by the various states in which 

we conduct the pharmacy business, as well as by the federal government. The pharmacies are regulated under the Food, Drug and 

Cosmetic Act and the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, which are administered by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Under 

the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, administered by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration,  

as a dispenser of controlled substances, our pharmacy operations must register with the Drug Enforcement Administration, file reports of 

inventories and transactions and provide adequate security measures. Failure to comply with such requirements could result in civil or 

criminal penalties. We are not aware of any violations of applicable laws relating to our institutional pharmacy operations through 

December 31, 2017.

Certificate of Need and Permit of Approval Laws

In addition to state licensing laws, some states require a provider to obtain a certificate of need or permit of approval prior to establishing, 

constructing, acquiring, or expanding certain health services, operations, or facilities. In these states, approvals are required for capital 

expenditures exceeding certain amounts that involve certain facilities or services, including home nursing agencies. The certificate  

of need or permit of approval issued by the state determines the service areas for the applicable agency or program. The following U.S. 

jurisdictions require certificates of need or permits of approval for home nursing agencies: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, 

Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, 

Washington, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. In addition, the state of Louisiana continues to have a moratorium on the 

issuance of new licenses for home nursing agencies that we expect to remain in effect for 2018.

State certificate of need and permit of approval laws generally provide that, prior to the addition of new capacity, the construction of 

new facilities or the introduction of new services, a designated state health planning agency must determine that a need exists for those 

beds, facilities, or services. The process is intended to promote comprehensive health care planning, assist in providing high quality 

health care at the lowest possible cost and avoid unnecessary duplication by ensuring that only needed health care facilities and 

operations are built and opened.

Accreditations

The Joint Commission is a nationwide commission that establishes standards relating to the physical plant, administration, quality of 

patient care and operation of medical staffs of health care organizations. Currently, Joint Commission accreditation of home nursing and 

hospice agencies is voluntary. However, some managed care organizations use Joint Commission accreditation as a credentialing 

standard for regional and state contracts. As of December 31, 2017, the Joint Commission had accredited 302 of our 318 home health 

agencies and 77 of our 91 hospice agencies. Those not yet accredited are working towards achieving this accreditation. As we acquire 

companies, we apply for accreditation 12 to 18 months after completing the acquisition.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, we had 14,554 employees, of which 9,315 were full-time. None of our employees are subject to a collective 

bargaining agreement. We consider our relationships with our employees and independent contractors to be good.

Insurance

We are subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. To cover claims that may arise, we maintain commercial 

insurance for healthcare professional liability, general liability, automobile liability, employed lawyers liability, fiduciary liability, crime liability, 

information security and privacy liabilities, and workers’ compensation/employer’s liability in amounts that we believe are appropriate and 

sufficient for our operations. We maintain claims-made healthcare professional liability and occurrence based general liability insurance 

that provides primary limits of $1.0 million per incident/ occurrence and $3.0 million in annual aggregate amounts. We maintain workers’ 

compensation insurance that meets state statutory requirements and provides a primary employer liability limit of $1.0 million to cover 

claims that may arise in the states in which we operate, excluding Ohio and Washington. Coverage for workers’ compensation matters 

within Ohio and Washington is procured from each state’s respective mandated programs and not through third party insurance payors. 

Under our workers’ compensation insurance policies, the Company maintains a deductible of the first $0.5 million in workers’ compensation 

liability. We maintain automobile liability insurance for all owned, hired and non-owned autos with a primary limit of $1.0 million.  

In addition, we currently maintain multiple layers of umbrella coverage in the aggregate amount of $40.0 million that provides excess 

24

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   24

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

coverage for healthcare professional liability, general liability, automobile liability and employer’s liability. We also maintain directors’ and 

officers’ liability insurance in the aggregate amount of $65.0 million. The cost and availability of insurance coverage has varied widely in 

recent years. While we believe that our insurance policies and coverage are adequate for a business enterprise of our type, we cannot 

guarantee that our insurance coverage is sufficient to cover all future claims or that it will continue to be available in adequate amounts or 

at a reasonable cost.

Available Information

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments 

to those reports are available free of charge on our internet website at www.lhcgroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such 

reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC also maintains an internet 

site at www.sec.gov that contains such reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file 

electronically with the SEC. These reports may also be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 

20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. Information 

contained on our website is not part of or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could cause our actual results to differ 

materially from past or expected results and are not the only ones we face. Other risks and uncertainties that we have not predicted or 

assessed may also adversely affect us.

If any of the negative effects associated with the following risks occur, our earnings, financial condition or business could be materially 

harmed and the trading price of our common stock could decline, resulting in the loss of all or part of stockholders’ investments.

Risk Factors Related to Reimbursement and Government Regulation

We cannot predict the effect that health care reform and other changes in government programs may have on our business, financial 

condition, or results of operations.

The PPACA and the Health Care Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Acts”) were signed into law by President Obama 

on March 23, 2010, and March 30, 2010, respectively. The Acts dramatically alter the United States’ health care system and are intended  

to decrease the number of uninsured Americans and reduce overall health care costs. The Acts attempt to achieve these goals by, among 

other things, requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance, expanding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, reducing Medicare and 

Medicaid payments, and tying reimbursement to the satisfaction of certain quality criteria. The Acts also contain a number of measures 

that are intended to reduce fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Because a majority of the measures contained in 

the Acts have either just recently or not yet taken effect, it is difficult to predict the impact the Acts will have on our operations. However, 

depending on how they are ultimately interpreted and implemented, the Acts could have an adverse effect on our business and its 

financial condition and results of operations.

The PPACA also amended the False Claims Act to provide that a provider must report and return overpayments within 60 days of 

identifying the overpayment or the claims for the services that generated the overpayments become false claims subject to the False Claims 

Act. Overpayments include payments for services for which the provider does not have proper documentation. If we were to identify 

documentation failures that could not be corrected, we could be required to return payments received for those claims within the mandated 

60-day time period. If we fail to identify and return overpayments within the required 60-day period we could be subject to suits under  

the False Claims Act by the government or relators (whistleblowers). On February 13, 2015, CMS announced that it will delay finalizing 

regulations that were intended to clarify when a payment is “identified” for purposes of the 60-day rule. Notwithstanding the delay, 

providers are still required to comply with the rule even though there is considerable uncertainty over exactly when the 60-day period 

begins. Due to this uncertainty, our continued compliance with the False Claims Act and its implementing regulations could have a 

material adverse impact on our business and operations.

05759-LHC.indd   25

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

25

LHC GROUP

Significant developments resulting from the recent U.S. presidential election could have a material effect on our business.

On January 30, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” that, 

among other things, will require federal agencies to cut two existing regulations for every new regulation they implement. The impact  

of any such changes to health care regulations on our financial performance and business prospects cannot be estimated at this time.  

It remains unclear what regulations might change, and whether any regulatory changes might affect, positively or negatively, our home 

health services, hospice services, community-based services, or facility-based services. Additionally, the new Executive Order also 

required a suspension of the implementation of any new planned regulations for a review period, which calls into question whether the 

implementation of changes to Conditions of Participation (CoPs) recently issued by CMS will be halted. Substantive changes to the 

regulations applicable to our business, in particular changes in compliance requirements or in reimbursement rates under Medicare, 

could have a material effect on our business and our financial performance.

Additionally, as a candidate, President Trump vowed to repeal and replace the PPACA. Significant changes to or the repeal of the 

PPACA could shift the U.S. health care system away from government reimbursement toward private business. It remains unclear which 

provisions of the PPACA will change, and whether any changes will affect our business or financial performance.

The appointment of Alex Azar as the new Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) may also affect our business. 

During his confirmation hearings, Mr. Azar expressed his personal opinions concerning the need to improve the way that Medicare and 

Medicaid reimburse for end-of-life care and praised the role that home health companies play in efforts to lower government health 

spending. While we look forward to working with Secretary Azar and HHS under his leadership, we cannot anticipate the effect that the 

appointment of Secretary Azar will have on HHS policy and/or Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements.

The impact of the recent significant federal tax reform on the combined company is uncertain and may significantly affect the operations 

of the combined company.

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) into law. The Tax Act is the most comprehensive 

tax legislation signed into law in over three decades and makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code. The Tax Act will 

significantly change how our earnings are taxed, including, among other items, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from  

35 percent to 21 percent, (2) repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and changing how existing AMT credits can be 

utilized, (3) temporarily providing for elective immediate expensing for certain depreciable property, (4) creating a new limitation on 

deductible interest expense, and (5) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax 

years beginning after December 31, 2017. While we currently expect the Tax Act to have a long-term positive impact on our net income, 

we are continuing to evaluate the impact of the Tax Act on our current and prospective business and such impact remains uncertain. 

Furthermore, our financial results may be negatively impacted should tax rates be increased in the future or otherwise adversely affected 

by changes in allowable expense deductions.

We derive a majority of our consolidated net service revenue from Medicare. If there are changes in Medicare rates or methods 

governing Medicare payments for our services, or if we are unable to control our costs, our results of operations and cash flows could 

decline materially.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we received 71.0%, 74.5% and 74.5%, respectively, of our net service revenue 

from Medicare. Reductions in Medicare rates or changes in the way Medicare pays for services could cause our net service revenue and 

net income to decline, perhaps materially. See Part I, Item 1. Reimbursement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information 

regarding reimbursements. Reductions in Medicare reimbursement could be caused by many factors, including:

•  administrative or legislative changes to the base rates under the applicable prospective payment systems;

•  the reduction or elimination of annual rate increases;

•  the imposition or increase by Medicare of mechanisms shifting more responsibility for a portion of payment to beneficiaries,  

such as co-payments;

•  adjustments to the relative components of the wage index used in determining reimbursement rates;

•  changes to case mix or therapy thresholds;

•  the reclassification of home health resource groups or long-term care diagnosis-related groups; or

•  further limitations on referrals to long-term acute care hospitals from host hospitals.

26

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   26

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

We receive fixed payments from Medicare for our services based on the level of care provided to our patients. Consequently, our 

profitability largely depends upon our ability to manage the cost of providing these services. Medicare currently provides for an annual 

adjustment of the various payment rates, such as the base episode rate for our home nursing services, based upon the increase or 

decrease of the medical care expenditure, which may be less than actual inflation. This adjustment could be eliminated or reduced in any 

given year. Also beginning on April 1, 2013 Medicare reimbursement was cut an additional 2% through sequestration as mandated by  

the Congressional Budget Act. Further, Medicare routinely reclassifies home health resource groups and long-term care diagnosis-related 

groups. As a result of those reclassifications, we could receive lower reimbursement rates depending on the case mix of the patients  

we service. If our cost of providing services increases by more than the annual Medicare price adjustment, or if these reclassifications 

result in lower reimbursement rates, our results of operations, net income and cash flows could be adversely impacted.

We are subject to extensive government regulation. Any changes in the laws and regulations governing our business, or the 

interpretation and enforcement of those laws or regulations, could require us to modify our operations and could negatively impact  

our operating results and cash flows.

As a provider of health care services, we are subject to extensive regulation on the federal, state and local levels, including with regard to:

•  licensure and certificates of need and permits of approval;

•  coding and billing for services;

•  conduct of operations, including financial relationships among health care providers, Medicare fraud and abuse and physician  

self-referral;

•  maintenance and protection of records, including HIPAA;

•  environmental protection, health and safety;

•  certification of additional agencies or facilities by the Medicare program; and

•  payment for services.

The laws and regulations governing our operations, along with the terms of participation in various government programs, regulate how 

we do business, the services we offer and our interactions with patients and other providers. See Part I, Item 1. Government Regulations 

in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information concerning applicable laws and regulations. These laws and regulations,  

and their interpretations, are subject to frequent change. Changes in existing laws, regulations, their interpretations or the enactment of 

new laws or regulations could increase our costs of doing business and cause our net income to decline. If we fail to comply with these 

applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate and our ability to 

participate in federal and state reimbursement programs.

On December 11, 2014, CMS proposed a star rating methodology for home health agencies to meet the PPACA’s call for more 

transparent, public information on provider quality. All Medicare-certified home health agencies would be eligible to receive a star rating 

(from one to five stars) based on a number of quality measures, such as timely initiation of care, drug education provided to patients,  

fall risk assessment, depression assessments, improvements in bed transferring, and bathing, among others. The “Quality of Patient Care 

Star Ratings” were first published in July 2015, and are updated quarterly thereafter based upon new data that is published with the 

ratings on the “Home Health Compare” section of the medicare.gov website. While we are pleased with the initial ratings received by our 

home health agencies and are striving to improve our results, it is not clear at this time what impact, if any, the new rating system will 

have on our home health business.

We face reviews, audits and investigations under our contracts with federal and state government agencies and private payors, and 

these audits could have adverse findings that may negatively impact our business.

We are subject to various routine and non-routine governmental reviews, audits and investigations. These audits include those conducted 

through the recovery audit contractor program (“RAC”) and the zone program integrity contractor program (“ZPIC”), in which third party 

firms engaged by CMS conduct extensive reviews of claims data and non-medical and other records to identify potential improper 

payments under the Medicare Program. In recent years, federal and state civil and criminal enforcement agencies have heightened and 

coordinated their oversight efforts related to the health care industry, including with respect to referral practices, cost reporting, billing 

practices, joint ventures and other financial relationships among health care providers. Although we have invested substantial time and 

effort in implementing policies and procedures to comply with laws and regulations, we could be subject to liabilities arising from violations. 

05759-LHC.indd   27

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

27

LHC GROUP

A violation of the laws governing our operations, or changes in the interpretation of those laws, could result in the imposition of fines, civil 

or criminal penalties, the termination of our rights to participate in federal and state-sponsored programs or the suspension or revocation  

of our licenses to operate. If we become subject to material fines or if other sanctions or other corrective actions are imposed upon us, 

we may suffer a substantial reduction in net income.

We are subject to federal and state laws that govern our employment practices. Failure to comply with these laws, or changes to these 

laws that increase our employment-related expenses, could adversely impact our operations.

We are required to comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations relating to employment, including occupational safety 

and health requirements, wage and hour requirements, employment insurance, and equal employment opportunity laws. These laws can 

vary significantly among states and can be highly technical. Costs and expenses related to these requirements are a significant operating 

expense and may increase as a result of, among other things, changes in federal or state laws or regulations requiring employers to 

provide specified benefits to employees, increases in the minimum wage and local living wage ordinances, increases in the level of existing 

benefits, or the lengthening of periods for which unemployment benefits are available. We may not be able to offset any increased costs 

and expenses. Furthermore, any failure to comply with these laws, including even a seemingly minor infraction, can result in significant 

penalties which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, a number of states require that 

direct care workers receive state-mandated minimum wage and/or overtime pay. Opponents say that the new protections will make 

in-home care more expensive for government programs that pay for such services, and that these new rules and regulations could result 

in a reduction in covered services. We will continue to evaluate the effect of these various new rules and regulations on our operations.

Current economic conditions and continued decline in spending by the Federal and state governments could adversely affect our results 

of operations and cash flows.

Worldwide economic conditions have significantly declined and will likely remain depressed for the foreseeable future. While our services 

are not typically sensitive to general declines in the federal and state economies, the erosion in the tax base caused by the general 

economic downturn has caused, and will likely continue to cause, restrictions on the federal and state governments’ abilities to obtain 

financing and a decline in spending. As a result, we may face reimbursement rate cuts or reimbursement delays from Medicare and 

Medicaid and other governmental payors, which could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows.

If any of our agencies or facilities fail to comply with the conditions of participation in the Medicare program, that agency or facility could 

be terminated from Medicare, which could adversely affect our net service revenue and net income.

Our agencies and facilities must comply with the extensive conditions of participation in the Medicare program. These conditions of 

participation vary depending on the type of agency or facility, but, in general, require our agencies and facilities to meet specified 

standards relating to personnel, patient rights, patient care, patient records, administrative reporting, and legal compliance. If an agency 

or facility fails to meet any of the Medicare conditions of participation, that agency or facility may receive a notice of deficiency from the 

applicable state surveyor. If that agency or facility then fails to institute a plan of correction to correct the deficiency within the time period 

provided by the state surveyor, that agency or facility could be terminated from the Medicare program. We respond in the ordinary 

course to deficiency notices issued by state surveyors and none of our facilities or agencies have ever been terminated from the  

Medicare program for failure to comply with the conditions of participation. Any termination of one or more of our agencies or facilities 

from the Medicare program for failure to satisfy the Medicare conditions of participation could adversely affect our net service revenue  

and net income.

On October 6, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule that would revise the Medicare and Medicaid conditions of participation for home health 

agencies. The proposed rule would require home health agencies to develop, implement, and maintain an agency-wide, data-driven 

quality assessment and improvement program and a system of communication and integration to identify patient needs and coordinate 

care. The proposed rule also aims to clarify and expand current patient rights requirements and contains several other clarifications  

and updates largely focused on creating a more patient-centered, data-driven, outcome-oriented process for patient care. If the proposed 

rule is finalized, we expect to face additional costs associated with compliance with such changes.

28

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   28

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Our revenue may be negatively impacted by a failure to appropriately document services, resulting in delays in reimbursement.

Reimbursement to us is conditioned upon providing the correct administrative and billing codes and properly documenting the services 

themselves, including the level of service provided, and the necessity for the services. If incorrect or incomplete documentation is provided 

or inaccurate reimbursement codes are utilized, this could result in nonpayment for services rendered and could lead to allegations of 

billing fraud. This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such 

as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on 

determinations that certain amounts are not covered, services provided were not medically necessary, or supporting documentation was 

not adequate. In addition, timing delays may cause working capital shortages. Working capital management, including prompt and diligent 

billing and collection, is an important factor in achieving our financial results and maintaining liquidity. It is possible that documentation 

support, system problems, provider issues or industry trends may extend our collection period, which may materially adversely affect our 

working capital, and our working capital management procedures may not successfully mitigate this risk.

The inability of our long-term acute care hospitals to maintain their certification as long-term acute care hospitals could have an adverse 

effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

If our LTACHs fail to meet or maintain the standards for Medicare certification as LTACHs, such as for average minimum patient length-of-

stay and restrictions on sources of referral (e.g. 25 Percent rule), they will receive reimbursement under the prospective payment system 

applicable to general acute care hospitals rather than the system applicable to long-term acute care hospitals. Payments at rates applicable 

to general acute care hospitals would likely result in our LTACHs receiving less Medicare reimbursement than they currently receive for  

their patient services. If any of our LTACHs were subject to payment as general acute care hospitals, our net service revenue and net 

income would decline. The 25 Percent rule will not be applied to LTACHs for discharges occurring on or before September 30, 2018.

The implementation of new patient criteria for our LTACHs under the BBA 2013 will reduce the population of patients eligible for 

LTACH-PPS and change the basis upon which we are paid which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

The BBA 2013 creates new Medicare criteria and payment rules for our LTACHs. Under the new criteria, our LTACHs treating patients  

with at least a three-day prior stay in an acute care hospital intensive care unit and patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation admitted 

from an acute care hospital will continue to receive payment under LTACH-PPS rate. Other patients will continue to have access to 

LTACH care, but our LTACH will be paid at a “site-neutral rate” for these patients, based on the lesser of per diem Medicare rates paid for 

patients with the same diagnoses under IPPS or LTACH costs.

The effective date of the new patient criteria was October 1, 2015, followed by a two-year phase-in period tied to each LTACH’s cost 

reporting period. During the phase-in period, payment for patients receiving the site-neutral rate will be based 50% on the current 

LTACH-PPS rate and 50% on the new site-neutral rate. For our two LTACHs that have a cost reporting period starting before July 1 of 

each year, the phase-in began on June 1, 2016. For our six LTACHs that have a cost reporting period starting on or after July 1 of  

each year, the phase-in began on September 1, 2016. As described in Item 1 above, the BBA 2018 extended the site neutral phase-in 

period for an additional two years, based upon a 4.6% reduction in site neutral payments over seven years.

We continue to analyze Medicare and internal data to estimate the number of our cases that will continue to be paid under the 

LTACH-PPS rate. At this time, we estimate that less than one-third of our current LTACH patients will be paid at the site-neutral rate under 

the new criteria once it is fully phased-in. The site-neutral payment rates will be based on the lesser of per diem Medicare rates paid for 

patients with the same diagnoses under IPPS or our LTACHs costs. There can be no assurance that these site-neutral payments will not 

be materially less than the payments currently provided under LTACH-PPS rates.

The additional patient criteria imposed by the BBA 2013 will reduce the population of patients eligible for LTACH-PPS rates and change the 

basis upon which our LTACHs are paid for other patients. In addition, the BBA 2013 will generate additional governmental regulations, 

including interpretations and enforcement actions surrounding those regulations. These changes could have a material adverse effect on 

our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

05759-LHC.indd   29

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

29

LHC GROUP

Our hospice operations are subject to two annual Medicare caps. If any of our hospice providers exceeds such caps, our business and 

consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Overall payments made by Medicare to each hospice provider number (generally corresponding to each of our hospice agencies) are 

subject to an inpatient cap amount and an overall payment cap amount, which are calculated and published by the Medicare fiscal 

intermediary on an annual basis covering the period from November 1 through October 31. If payments received under any of our hospice 

provider numbers exceeds either of these caps, we may be required to reimburse Medicare for payments received in excess of the caps, 

which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

If the structures or operations of our joint ventures are found to violate the law, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial 

condition and consolidated results of operations.

Several of our joint ventures are with hospitals and physicians, which are governed by the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and similar state 

laws. These anti-kickback statutes prohibit the payment or receipt of anything of value in return for referrals of patients or services covered 

by governmental health care programs, such as Medicare. The OIG has published numerous safe harbors that exempt qualifying 

arrangements from enforcement under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. We have sought to satisfy as many safe harbor requirements as 

possible in structuring our joint ventures. For example, each of our equity joint ventures with hospitals and physicians is structured in 

accordance with the following principles:

•  the investment interest offered is not based upon actual or expected referrals by the hospital or physician;

•  our joint venture partners are not required to make or influence referrals to the joint venture;

•  at the time the joint venture is formed, each hospital or physician joint venture partner is required to make an actual capital contribution 

to the joint venture equal to the fair market value of his or her investment interest and is at risk to lose his or her investment;

•  neither we nor the joint venture entity lends funds to or guarantees a loan to the hospital or physician to acquire interests in the joint 

venture; and

•  distributions to our joint venture partners are based solely on their equity interests and are not affected by referrals from the hospital 

or physician.

Despite our efforts to meet the safe harbor requirements where possible, our joint ventures may not satisfy all elements of the safe 

harbor requirements.

If any of our joint ventures were found to be in violation of federal or state anti-kickback or physician referral laws, we could be required to 

restructure them or refuse to accept referrals from the physicians or hospitals with which we have entered into a joint venture. We also 

could be required to repay to Medicare amounts we have received pursuant to any prohibited referrals, and we could suffer civil or criminal 

penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate and our ability to participate in federal and state health care programs. If any of  

our joint ventures were subject to any of these penalties, our business could be materially adversely affected. If the structure of any of our 

joint ventures were found to violate federal or state anti-kickback statutes or physician referral laws, we may be unable to implement  

our growth strategy, which could have an adverse impact on our future net income and consolidated results of operations.

The application of state certificate of need and permit of approval regulations and compliance with federal and state licensing 

requirements could substantially limit our ability to operate and grow our business.

Our ability to expand operations in a state will depend on our ability to obtain a state license to operate. States may have a limit on the 

number of licenses they issue. For example, Louisiana currently has a moratorium on the issuance of new home nursing agency licenses. 

We cannot predict whether the moratorium in Louisiana will be extended. In addition, we cannot predict whether any other states in 

which we operate, or may wish to operate in the future, may adopt a similar moratorium.

As of December 31, 2017, we operated in 12 states that require health care providers to obtain prior approval, known as a certificate  

of need or a permit of approval, for the purchase, construction or expansion of health care facilities, to make certain capital expenditures 

or to make changes in services or bed capacity. The failure to obtain any requested certificate of need, permit of approval or other 

license could impair our ability to operate or expand our business.

30

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   30

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Risk Factors Related to Capital and Liquidity

The condition of the financial markets, including volatility and weakness in the equity, capital and credit markets, could limit the availability 

and terms of debt and equity financing sources to fund the capital and liquidity requirements of our business.

Financial markets may experience significant disruptions, which could impact liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for 

borrowers less attractive and, in certain cases, significantly reducing the availability of certain types of debt financing. We have not 

experienced any individual lender limitations to extend credit under our revolving credit facility. However, the obligations of each of the 

lending institutions in our revolving credit facility are separate and the availability of future borrowings under our revolving credit facility 

could be impacted by further volatility and disruptions in the financial credit markets or other events. Our inability to access our revolving 

credit facility or refinance the revolving credit facility would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of 

operations and liquidity.

Based on our current plan of operations, including acquisitions (other than the Merger), we believe our existing cash balance, when 

combined with expected cash flows from operations and amounts available under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to fund our 

growth strategy and to meet our anticipated operating expenses, capital expenditures and debt service obligations for at least the next  

12 months. If our future net service revenue or cash flow from operations is less than we currently anticipate, we may not have sufficient 

funds to implement our growth strategy. Further, we cannot readily predict the timing, size and success of our acquisition and internal 

development efforts and the associated capital commitments. If we do not have sufficient cash resources, our growth could be limited 

unless we are able to obtain additional equity or debt financing.

In addition, we must obtain the consent of certain of the lenders under our credit facility prior to the consummation of the Merger with 

Almost Family, as the Merger would constitute a default under our credit facility. Almost Family’s credit facility contains similar consent 

requirements and default provisions that would be triggered by the Merger. As a result, we intend to amend or refinance our credit facility, 

potentially seek additional sources of financing, and terminate Almost Family’s credit facility in connection with the closing of the Merger. 

We intend to pay the outstanding borrowings and accrued and unpaid interest under Almost Family’s credit facility and certain debt 

issuance costs and Merger-related fees and expenses from the proceeds of such amendment or refinancing. Although we currently believe 

that we will be able to obtain any necessary amendment or refinancing of our credit facility at a reasonable cost, there can be no 

assurance that we will succeed in obtaining such amendment or refinancing on favorable terms, if at all, which could significantly increase 

our future interest expense and adversely impact our results of operations and the anticipated benefits from the Merger.

The agreement governing our revolving credit facility contains, and future debt agreements may contain, various covenants that limit 

our discretion in the operation of our business.

The agreement and instruments governing our revolving credit facility, and the agreements and instruments governing future debt 

agreements may contain various restrictive covenants that, among other things, require us to comply with or maintain certain financial 

tests and ratios that may restrict our ability to:

•  incur more debt;

•  redeem or repurchase stock, pay dividends or make other distributions;

•  make certain investments;

•  create liens;

•  enter into transactions with affiliates;

•  make unapproved acquisitions;

•  merge or consolidate;

•  transfer or sell assets; and/or

•  make fundamental changes in our corporate existence and principal business.

05759-LHC.indd   31

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

31

LHC GROUP

In addition, events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with and maintain such financial tests and ratios. Any failure by us 

to comply with or maintain all applicable financial tests and ratios and to comply with all applicable covenants could result in an event of 

default with respect to our revolving credit facility or any other future debt agreements. An event of default could lead to the acceleration of 

the maturity of any outstanding loans and the termination of the commitments to make further extensions of credit. Even if we are able to 

comply with all applicable covenants, the restrictions on our ability to operate our business at our sole discretion could harm our business 

by, among other things, limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, mergers, acquisitions and other corporate opportunities.

Our net service revenue is concentrated in a small number of states, which makes us sensitive to regulatory and economic changes in 

those states.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, our facilities in Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, and Arkansas accounted for 

approximately 55.0% of our net service revenue. Accordingly, any changes in the current demographic, economic, competitive, or 

regulatory conditions in these states could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash 

flows. Medicaid changes in these states could also have a material effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Hurricanes or other adverse weather events could negatively affect the local economies in which we operate or disrupt our operations, 

which could have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Our operations along coastal areas in the southern United States are particularly susceptible to hurricanes. Such weather events can 

disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. Future hurricanes 

could affect our operations or the economies in those market areas and result in damage to certain of our facilities, the equipment located  

at such facilities or equipment rented to patients in those areas. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these 

and other negative effects of future hurricanes. Although we maintain insurance coverage, we cannot guarantee that our insurance 

coverage will be adequate to cover any losses or that we will be able to maintain insurance at a reasonable cost in the future. If our losses 

from business interruption or property damage exceed the amount for which we are insured, our results of operations and financial 

condition would be adversely affected.

We may be more vulnerable to the effects of a public health catastrophe than other businesses due to the nature of our patients.

The majority of our patients are older individuals and others with complex medical challenges, many of whom may be more vulnerable 

than the general public during a pandemic or in a public health catastrophe. Our employees are also at greater risk of contracting 

contagious diseases due to their increased exposure to vulnerable patients. For example, if a flu pandemic were to occur, we could suffer 

significant losses to our consumer population or a reduction in the availability of our employees and, at a high cost, be required to hire 

replacements for affected workers. Accordingly, certain public health catastrophes could have a material adverse effect on our financial 

condition and results of operations.

Delays in reimbursement may cause liquidity problems.

Our business is characterized by delays in reimbursement from the time we request payment for our services to the time we receive 

reimbursement or payment. A portion of our estimated reimbursement (60% for an initial episode of care and 50% for subsequent 

episodes of care) for each Medicare episode is billed at the commencement of the episode and we typically receive payment within 

approximately seven days. The remaining reimbursement is billed upon completion of the episode and is typically paid within 14 to 17 days 

from the billing date. If we have information system problems or issues arise with Medicare or other payors, we may encounter further 

delays in our payment cycle. For example, in the past we have experienced delays resulting from problems arising out of the 

implementation by Medicare of new or modified reimbursement methodologies or as a result of natural disasters, such as hurricanes. We 

have also experienced delays in reimbursement resulting from our implementation of new information systems related to our accounts 

receivable and billing functions. Any future timing delay may cause working capital shortages. As a result, working capital management, 

including prompt and diligent billing and collection, is an important factor in our consolidated results of operations and liquidity. Our 

working capital management procedures may not successfully negate this risk. Significant delays in payment or reimbursement could 

have an adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition.

32

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   32

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Risk Factors Related to Operations and Our Growth Strategy

We could be required to record a material non-cash charge to income if our recorded goodwill or intangible assets are impaired.

Goodwill and other intangible assets represent a significant portion of the assets on our balance sheet and are assessed for impairment 

annually or whenever circumstances indicate potential impairment. The goodwill assessment includes comparing the fair value of each 

reporting unit to the carrying value of the assets assigned to the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit were to exceed 

our estimate of fair value of the reporting unit, we would be required to estimate the fair value of the assets and liabilities within the 

reporting unit to ascertain the fair value of goodwill. If we determine that the fair value is less than our book value, we could be required  

to record a non-cash impairment charge to our consolidated statements of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on  

our earnings, debt covenants and ability to access capital.

We assess other intangible assets, such as trade names and licenses, individually, based on expected revenue and cash flows to be 

generated by those assets. Specific economic factors and conditions attributed to local agencies could cause these expected revenue 

and cash flows to decrease. If we determine that the fair value is less than the carrying value, we could be required to record material 

non-cash impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, debt covenants and ability to access capital.

Our allowance for contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts may not be sufficient to cover uncollectible amounts.

On an ongoing basis, we estimate the amount of Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance receivables that we will not be able to collect. 

This allows us to calculate the expected loss on our receivables for the period we are reporting. Our allowance for contractual adjustments 

and doubtful accounts may underestimate actual uncollectible receivables for various reasons, including:

•  adverse changes in our estimates as a result of changes in payor mix and related collection rates;

•  inability to collect funds due to missed filing deadlines or inability to prove that timely filings were made;

•  adverse changes in the economy generally exceeding our expectations; or

•  unanticipated changes in reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance companies.

If our allowance for contractual adjustments and doubtful accounts is insufficient to cover losses on our receivables, our business, 

financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Changes in the case mix of patients, as well as payor mix and payment methodologies, may have a material adverse effect on our 

results of operations and cash flows.

The sources and amounts of our patient revenue are determined by a number of factors, including the mix of patients and the rates  

of reimbursement among payors. Changes in the case mix of the patients, payment methodologies or payor mix among private pay, 

Medicare and Medicaid may significantly affect our results of operations and cash flows.

Shortages in qualified nurses and other health care professionals could increase our operating costs significantly or constrain our ability 

to grow.

We rely on our ability to attract and retain qualified nurses and other health care professionals. The availability of qualified nurses nationwide 

has declined in recent years and competition for these and other health care professionals has increased and, therefore, salary and 

benefit costs have risen accordingly. Our ability to attract and retain nurses and other health care professionals depends on several factors, 

including our ability to provide desirable assignments and competitive benefits and salaries. We may not be able to attract and retain 

qualified nurses or other health care professionals in the future. In addition, the cost of attracting and retaining these professionals and 

providing them with attractive benefit packages may be higher than anticipated which could cause our net income to decline. Moreover,  

if we are unable to attract and retain qualified professionals, the quality of services offered to our patients may decline or our ability to grow 

may be constrained.

05759-LHC.indd   33

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

33

LHC GROUP

If we are required to either repurchase or sell a substantial portion of the equity interests in our joint ventures, our capital resources and 

financial condition could be materially adversely impacted.

Upon the occurrence of fundamental changes to the laws and regulations applicable to our joint ventures, or if a substantial number of  

our joint venture partners were to exercise the buy/sell provisions contained in many of our joint venture agreements, we may be obligated 

to purchase or sell the equity interests held by us or our joint venture partners. In some instances, the purchase price under these buy/sell 

provisions is based on a multiple of the historical or future earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization of the equity joint 

venture at the time the buy/sell option is exercised. In other instances, the buy/sell purchase price will be negotiated by the partners  

but will be subject to a fair market valuation process. In the event the buy/sell provisions are exercised and we lack sufficient capital to 

purchase the interest of our joint venture partners, we may be obligated to sell our equity interest in these joint ventures. If we are forced  

to sell our equity interest, we will lose the benefit of those particular joint venture operations. If these buy/sell provisions are exercised and 

we choose to purchase the interest of our joint venture partners, we may be obligated to expend significant capital in order to complete 

such acquisitions. If either of these events occurs, our net service revenue and net income could decline or we may not have sufficient 

capital necessary to implement our growth strategy.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with existing referral sources or establish new referral sources, our growth and net income 

could be adversely affected.

Our success depends significantly on referrals from physicians, hospitals and other health care providers in the communities in which we 

deliver our services. Our referral sources are not obligated to refer business to us and may refer business to other health care providers. 

We believe many of our referral sources refer business to us as a result of the quality of patient care provided by our local employees in the 

communities in which our agencies and facilities are located. If we are unable to retain these employees, our referral sources may refer 

business to other health care providers. Our loss of, or failure to maintain, existing relationships or our failure to develop new relationships 

could adversely affect our ability to expand our operations and operate profitably.

We face competition, including from competitors with greater resources, which may make it difficult for us to compete effectively as a 

provider of post-acute health care services.

We compete with local and regional home nursing and hospice companies, hospitals and other businesses that provide post-acute  

health care services, some of which are large, established companies that have significantly greater resources than we do. Our primary 

competition comes from local operators in each of our markets. We expect our competitors to develop joint ventures with providers, 

referral sources and payors, which could result in increased competition. The introduction by our competitors of new and enhanced 

service offerings, in combination with industry consolidation and the development of competitive joint ventures, could cause a decline  

in net service revenue and loss of market acceptance of our services. Future increases in competition from existing competitors or new 

entrants may limit our ability to maintain or increase our market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current  

or future competitors and competitive pressures may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results  

of operations.

We may close additional underperforming agencies in the future.

We regularly review the performance of our various agencies. Our review considers the current financial performance, market penetration, 

forecasted market growth and current and future reimbursement payment forecasts.

We will continue to monitor the performance of our agencies on an ongoing basis, and closures may from time to time occur in the future. 

If we take any further action to close agencies, we will incur additional costs and expenses, which may require us to record significant 

charges in future periods. While any such closures would be made in connection with our constant efforts to improve our profitability, 

associated charges would have a negative impact on our revenue and possibly our operating results during the short-term.

34

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   34

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Future acquisitions may be unsuccessful and could expose us to unforeseen liabilities. Further, our acquisition and internal development 

activity may impose strains on our existing resources.

Our growth strategy involves the acquisition of home nursing agencies and hospice agencies throughout the United States. These 

acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties integrating acquired personnel and other corporate cultures into 

our business, the potential loss of key employees or patients of acquired agencies and the assumption of liabilities and exposure to 

unforeseen liabilities of acquired agencies. We may not be able to fully integrate the operations of the acquired businesses with our current 

business structure in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The failure to effectively integrate any of these businesses could have a 

material adverse effect on our operations.

We generally structure our acquisitions as asset purchase transactions in which we expressly state that we are not assuming any 

pre-existing liabilities of the seller and obtain indemnification rights from the previous owners for acts or omissions arising prior to the 

date of such acquisitions. However, the allocation of liability arising from such acts or omissions between the parties could involve the 

expenditure of a significant amount of time, manpower and capital. Further, the former owners of the agencies and facilities we acquire 

may not have the financial resources necessary to satisfy our indemnification claims relating to pre-existing liabilities. If we were unsuccessful 

in a claim for indemnification from a seller, the liability imposed could materially adversely affect our operations.

In addition, as we continue to expand our markets, our growth could strain our resources, including management, information and 

accounting systems, regulatory compliance, logistics and other internal controls. Our resources may not keep pace with our anticipated 

growth. If we do not manage our expected growth effectively, our future prospects could be affected adversely.

We may face increased competition for attractive acquisition and joint venture candidates.

We intend to continue growing through the acquisition of additional home-based agencies and the formation of joint ventures with hospitals 

for the operation of home-based agencies. We face competition for acquisition and joint venture candidates, which may limit the number  

of acquisition and joint venture opportunities available to us or lead to the payment of higher prices for our acquisitions and joint ventures. We 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition or joint venture opportunities in the future or that any such opportunities,  

if identified, will be consummated on favorable terms, if at all. Without successful acquisitions or joint ventures, our future growth rate could 

decline. In addition, we cannot guarantee that any future acquisitions or joint ventures, if consummated, will result in further growth.

Federal regulation may impair our ability to consummate acquisitions or open new agencies.

Changes in federal laws or regulations may materially adversely impact our ability to acquire home nursing agencies or open new start-up 

home nursing agencies. For example, CMS has adopted a regulation known as the “36 Month Rule” that is applicable to home health 

agency acquisitions. Subject to certain exceptions, the 36 Month Rule prohibits buyers of certain home health agencies – those that either 

enrolled in Medicare or underwent a change in ownership fewer than 36 months prior to the acquisitions – from assuming the Medicare 

billing privileges of the acquired agency. Instead, the acquired home health agencies must enroll as new providers with Medicare. As a 

result, the 36 Month Rule may further increase competition for acquisition targets that are not subject to the rule, and may cause 

significant Medicare billing delays for the purchases of home health agencies that are subject to the rule.

If we are subject to substantial malpractice or other similar claims, it could materially adversely impact our results of operations and 

financial condition.

The services we offer have an inherent risk of professional liability and substantial damage awards. We, and the nurses and other health 

care professionals who provide services on our behalf, may be the subject of medical malpractice claims. These nurses and other  

health care professionals could be considered our agents and, as a result, we could be held liable for their medical negligence. We cannot 

predict the effect that any claims of this nature, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have on our business or reputation or on our 

ability to attract and retain patients and employees. We maintain malpractice liability insurance that provides primary coverage on a 

claims-made basis of $1.0 million per incident and $3.0 million in annual aggregate amounts. In addition, we maintain multiple layers of 

umbrella coverage in the aggregate amount of $40.0 million that provide excess coverage for professional malpractice and other liabilities. 

We are responsible for deductibles and amounts in excess of the limits of our coverage. Claims that could be made in the future in 

excess of the limits of such insurance, if successful, could materially adversely affect our financial condition. In addition, our insurance 

coverage may not continue to be available to us at commercially reasonable rates, in adequate amounts or on satisfactory terms.

Form 10-K Part I

35

05759-LHC.indd   35

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LHC GROUP

Failure of, or problems with, our critical software or information systems could harm our business and operating results.

We depend upon reliable and secure information systems to provide valuable tools by which we manage our business, comply with  

legal requirements and provide services. In addition to our Service Value Point system, our business is also substantially dependent on 

non-proprietary software. We utilize third-party software information systems for billing and maintaining patient claim receivables. Our 

systems require constant maintenance and upgrades to preserve and enhance system capabilities and security. Problems with, or the 

failure of, our information systems or software could negatively impact our clinical performance and our management and reporting 

capabilities. Any significant problems with or failures of our information systems or software could materially and adversely affect our 

operations and reputation, result in significant costs to us, cause delays in our ability to bill Medicare or other payors for our services,  

or impair our ability to provide our services in the future. The costs incurred in correcting any errors or problems with our proprietary and 

non-proprietary software may be substantial and could adversely affect our net income. Our agencies also depend upon our information 

systems for accounting, billing, collections, risk management, quality assurance, payroll, education tracking and operational performance. 

If we experience a reduction in the performance, reliability, availability or accuracy of our information systems, our operations and 

financial performance, and ability to report timely and accurate information, could be adversely affected.

Operations that we acquire must be integrated into our various information systems in an efficient and effective manner. For certain 

aspects, we rely upon third party contractors to assist us with those activities. If we are unable to integrate and transition any acquired 

business into our information systems, due to our failures or any failure of our third party contractors, we could incur unanticipated 

expenses, suffer disruptions in service, experience regulatory issues and lose revenue from the operation of such business.

Our information systems are networked via public network infrastructure and standards based encryption tools that meet regulatory 

requirements for transmission of protected health information over such networks. We have installed privacy protection systems on our 

network and point-of-care devices to prevent unauthorized access to proprietary, sensitive and legally protected information. However, 

threats from computer viruses, instability of the public network on which our data transit relies, or other instances that might render those 

networks unstable or disabled would create operational difficulties for us, including difficulties effectively transmitting claims and maintaining 

efficient clinical oversight of our patients, as well as disrupting revenue reporting and billing and collections management, which could 

adversely affect our business or operations. If personal or protected information of our patients, employees or others with whom we do 

business is tampered with, stolen or otherwise improperly accessed, we may incur additional fines and penalties associated with the 

breach of security or take other action with respect to judicial or regulatory actions arising out of the incident, including under HIPAA or 

other judicial acts, as applicable.

Our information systems are also subject to damage or service interruption due to natural disasters, floods, fires, loss of power, loss of 

telecommunications connectivity, and other events that may be beyond our immediate control. While we maintain and test various disaster 

recovery plans and procedures, our failure to successfully implement and execute upon such plans and procedures, and restore the full 

operational capabilities of our information systems and software in an effective and efficient manner, could have a material adverse effect 

on the functionality of our information systems and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and cause a 

possible significant disruption of our operations and services.

Our failure to negotiate favorable managed care contracts, or our loss of existing favorable managed care contracts, could have a 

material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

One of our strategies is to diversify our payor sources by increasing the business we do with managed care companies, and we strive to 

secure favorable contracts with managed care payors. However, we may not be successful in these efforts. Additionally, there is a risk that 

any favorable managed care contracts that we can secure may be terminated on short notice, since managed care contracts typically 

permit the payor to terminate without cause, typically on 60 days notice. Such provisions can provide payors with leverage to reduce 

volume or obtain favorable pricing. Our failure to negotiate, secure and maintain favorable managed care contracts could have a material 

adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

36

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   36

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Risk Factors Related to Our Ownership and Management

As a holding company, we have no material assets or operations of our own.

We are a holding company, whereby our material assets and operations are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our ability to service 

our debt, if any, is dependent upon the earnings from the business conducted by our subsidiaries. The distributions of those earnings or 

advances or other distributions of funds by these subsidiaries to us are contingent upon the subsidiaries’ earnings and are subject to 

various business considerations. In addition, distributions by subsidiaries could be subject to statutory restrictions, including state laws 

requiring that the subsidiary be solvent, or contractual restrictions. If our subsidiaries are unable to make sufficient distributions or 

advances to us, we may not have the cash resources necessary to service our debt.

The loss of certain executive management or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial 

performance.

Our success depends upon the continued employment of our executive management team and key employees and our ability to retain 

and motivate these individuals. If we lose the services of one or more of our executive officers or key employees, we may not be able  

to successfully manage our business, achieve our business goals or replace them with equally qualified personnel. The loss of any of our 

executive officers or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance.

Our executive officers and directors and their affiliates hold a substantial portion of our outstanding shares of common stock and could 

exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, regardless of the wishes of other stockholders.

Our executive officers and directors and individuals or entities affiliated with them, beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 10.5% 

of our outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2017. The interests of these stockholders may differ from other 

stockholders’ interests. If they were to act together, these affiliated stockholders would be able to significantly influence all matters that  

our stockholders vote upon, including the election of directors, business combinations, the amendment of our certificate of incorporation 

and other significant corporate actions.

Certain provisions of our charter, bylaws, and Delaware law may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

Delaware law and our governing documents contain provisions that may enable our Board of Directors to resist a change in control of us. 

These provisions include:

•  staggered terms for our Board of Directors;

•  limitations on persons authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders;

•  the authorization of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without 

stockholder approval; and

•  advance notice procedures required for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an 

annual meeting of stockholders.

These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of us. These provisions could 

also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors or cause us to take other corporate actions.

We have implemented other anti-takeover provisions or provisions that could have an anti-takeover effect. These provisions and others 

that our Board of Directors may adopt hereafter, may discourage offers to acquire us and may permit our Board of Directors to choose not 

to entertain offers to purchase us, even if such offers include a substantial premium to the market price of our common stock. Therefore, 

our stockholders may be deprived of opportunities to profit from a sale of control.

05759-LHC.indd   37

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

37

LHC GROUP

Our common stock is traded infrequently, which may cause volatility in our stock price, including a decline in value.

We have a relatively low volume of daily trades in our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). For example, the 

average daily trading volume of our common stock on NASDAQ over the three-month trading period ending February 23, 2018 was 

approximately 223,874 shares per day. Because our common stock is traded infrequently, the price per share of our common stock can 

fluctuate more significantly from day-to-day than a widely held stock that is actively traded on a daily basis. For example, trading of a 

large volume of our common stock may have a significant impact on the trading price of our common stock. In addition, future issuances 

of our common stock, including the exercise of any options or the vesting of any restricted stock that we may grant to directors, 

executive officers and other employees in the future and the issuance of our common stock in connection with acquisitions, could have  

an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and, consequently, our stockholders’ ability to 

achieve a return on investment will depend solely on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not pay dividends on our shares of common stock and intend to retain all future earnings to finance the continued growth and 

development of our business and for general corporate purposes. In addition, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common 

stock in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements, 

credit facility limitations, earnings and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

If we identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, our business and our stock price could be adversely affected.

We are required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley. 

Under Section 404, we are required to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and report our conclusion  

in our Annual Report. Our independent registered public accounting firm is also required to report its conclusion regarding the effectiveness 

of our internal control over financial reporting. The existence of one or more material weaknesses could require us and our auditor  

to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. If material weaknesses in our internal control over financial 

reporting are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence in our financial reporting, which could 

have an adverse effect on our business and price of our common stock.

Risk Factors Related to the Merger with Almost Family

While the Merger is pending, we will be subject to business uncertainties that could adversely affect our business and operations.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees, joint venture partners, third party payors, customers, and other persons with 

whom we have a business relationship may have an adverse effect on our business, operations, and stock price. During the pendency of 

the Merger, our existing customers or partners could decide to no longer do business with us. In addition, certain of our projects may  

be delayed or ceased and business decisions could be deferred. Persons with whom we have a business relationship, such as joint venture 

partners and third party payors, could also decide to terminate, modify, or renegotiate their relationships with us or take other actions  

as a result of the Merger that could negatively affect our revenue, earnings, and cash flows. Employee retention may be challenging during 

the pendency of the Merger, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles. If key employees depart, our 

business prior to the Merger, and the business of the combined company following the Merger, could be materially harmed. In addition, 

stockholders and market analysts could also have a negative perception of the Merger, which could cause a material reduction in our  

stock price and could also result in (i) our not achieving the requisite vote to approve the issuance of our shares in the Merger and/or  

(ii) Almost Family not achieving the requisite vote to adopt the Merger.

38

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   38

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our stock prices and the future business and financial results.

Completion of the Merger is not assured. If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing business and financial results may be adversely 

affected and we will be subject to several risks, including the following:

•  the price of our common stock may decline to the extent that current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Merger will  

be completed;

•  having to pay significant costs relating to the Merger without receiving the benefits of the Merger, including, in certain circumstances,  

a termination fee of $30 million or an expense reimbursement of up to $5 million;

•  negative reactions from customers, stockholders, and market analysts;

•  the possible loss of employees necessary to operate our business;

•  we will have been subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business, which may have prevented us from making certain 

acquisitions or dispositions or pursuing certain business opportunities while the Merger was pending, and

•  the diversion of the focus of our management to the Merger instead of on pursuing other opportunities that could have been beneficial 

to us and our business.

If the Merger is not completed, we cannot assure our stockholders that these risks will not materialize and will not materially adversely 

affect our business, financial results, and stock price.

The consummation of the Merger is contingent upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including stockholder and regulatory 

approvals, that are outside of our or Almost Family’s control and that we and Almost Family may be unable to satisfy or obtain or which 

may delay the consummation of the Merger or result in the imposition of conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits from the 

Merger or cause the parties to abandon the Merger.

Consummation of the Merger is contingent upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, some of which are beyond our and Almost 

Family’s control, including, among others: (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a 

majority of the outstanding shares of Almost Family’s common stock, (ii) the approval of the issuance of shares of our common stock to 

be issued to the Almost Family stockholders in the Merger by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock 

present in person or represented by proxy at our special meeting, (iii) the expiration or termination of the required waiting periods under 

the HSR Act, which expiration occurred on February 21, 2018, (iv) the absence of any order or law prohibiting the Merger or the other 

transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (v) the effectiveness of the registration statement concerning our common stock to 

be issued to the Almost Family stockholders in the Merger, (vi) the receipt of certain tax opinions, and (vii) the absence of a material 

adverse effect with respect to either us or Almost Family (as defined in the Merger Agreement). In addition, several lawsuits have been filed 

against Almost Family and us challenging the adequacy of public disclosures related to the Merger and adverse rulings in these lawsuits 

may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed or require us or Almost Family to incur significant costs to defend or settle these 

lawsuits. Any delay in completing the Merger could cause the combined company not to realize, or to be delayed in realizing, some or  

l of the benefits that we expect it to achieve if the Merger is successfully completed within its expected time frame.

The Merger Agreement also requires that we and Almost Family use reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary or advisable 

approvals from governmental authorities, including those from a number of the federal, state, and municipal authorities that regulate our 

business and the business of Almost Family, including in the state New York, which accounts for approximately 7% of Almost Family’s 

annual revenues. There can be no assurances that these regulatory approvals will be obtained or what conditions may be imposed on the 

companies in order to obtain such approvals. While these regulatory approvals are not a condition to closing the Merger, the failure  

to obtain any of these regulatory approvals could impose additional material costs on, or materially limit the revenue of, the combined 

company following the Merger, including ceasing operations or divesting assets in certain jurisdictions, including in the state of New York.

05759-LHC.indd   39

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

39

LHC GROUP

The combined company may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Merger or those benefits may take longer to realize than 

expected. The combined company may also encounter significant difficulties in integrating the two businesses.

The ability of the combined company to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger will depend, to a large extent, on the combined 

company’s ability to successfully integrate the two businesses. The combination of two independent businesses is a complex, costly, and 

time-consuming process. As a result, the combined company will be required to devote significant management attention and resources  

to integrating our business practices and operations with the business practices and operations of Almost Family. The integration process 

may disrupt the business of the combined company and, if implemented ineffectively, would restrict the full realization of the anticipated 

benefits. The failure to meet the challenges involved in integrating the two businesses and to realize the anticipated benefits of the 

transaction could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined company and could adversely impact 

the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the combined company. In addition, the overall integration of the businesses 

may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, loss of customers, and diversion of the attention of the combined 

company’s management and employees. The challenges of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:

•  difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities, and growth prospects from the combination;

•  difficulties in the integration of operations and systems, including information technology systems;

•  difficulties in establishing effective uniform controls, standards, systems, procedures, and accounting and other policies; business 

cultures and compensation structures between the two companies;

•  difficulties in the acculturation of employees;

•  difficulties managing the expanded operations of a larger and more complex company;

•  challenges in keeping existing customers and obtaining new customers;

•  challenges in attracting new joint venture partners and acquisition targets;

•  challenges in attracting and retaining key personnel, including personnel that are considered key to the future success of the combined 

company; and

•  challenges in keeping key business relationships in place.

Many of these factors will be outside of the control of the combined company, and any one of them could result in increased costs and 

liabilities, decreases in the amount of expected revenue and earnings, and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could  

have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the combined company. In addition, even  

if the operations of our business and the business of Almost Family are integrated successfully, the full benefits of the transaction may  

not be realized, including the synergies, cost savings, growth opportunities, or cash flows that are expected, and the combined company 

will also be subject to additional risks that could impact future earnings. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time 

frame, or at all. Further, additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of our business with the business of Almost 

Family. All of these factors could cause dilution of the earnings per share of the combined company, decrease or delay the expected 

accretive effect of the Merger, negatively impact the price of the combined company’s stock, impair the ability of the combined 

company to return capital to its stockholders, or have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of 

operations of the combined company.

The Merger may not be accretive and may cause dilution of the combined company’s adjusted earnings per share, which may negatively 

affect the market price of the combined company’s common stock.

We currently anticipate that the Merger will be accretive to stockholders of the combine company on an adjusted earnings per share  

basis in 2018. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates, which may materially change. The combined company could also 

encounter additional transaction and integration-related costs or other factors such as the failure to realize all of the benefits anticipated  

in the Merger. All of these factors could cause dilution of the combined company’s adjusted earnings per share or decrease or delay  

the expected accretive effect of the Merger and cause a decrease in the market value of the combined company’s common stock.

40

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   40

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses related to the Merger and our integration with Almost Family.

The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses in connection with the Merger and our integration with Almost Family. 

There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies, and systems that must be integrated, including 

purchasing, accounting and finance, legal, sales, payroll, pricing, revenue management, research and development, marketing, and 

benefits. While we have assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred, there are many factors beyond our control that could 

affect the total amount or the timing of the integration expenses. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, 

difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that the combined company 

expects to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings. These integration 

expenses likely will result in the combined company taking significant charges against earnings following the completion of the Merger, 

and the amount and timing of such charges are uncertain at present.

The future results of the combined company will suffer if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations 

following the Merger.

Following the Merger, the size of the business of the combined company will increase significantly beyond the current size of either our 

business or Almost Family’s business. The combined company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to manage this 

expanded business, which will pose substantial challenges for the management of the combined company, including challenges related  

to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that 

the combined company will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue enhancements, 

and other benefits currently anticipated from the Merger.

Furthermore, we have incurred and expect to incur significant costs, expenses and fees for professional services and other transaction 

costs in connection with the Merger. In addition, the Merger could result in additional costs and expenses that were not expected or 

anticipated, and such costs and expenses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation prior  

to the Merger and of the combined company thereafter.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

We have no unresolved written comments from the staff of the SEC regarding our periodic or current reports filed under the Exchange Act.

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal executive office is located in Lafayette, Louisiana in a 66,846 square feet building that is leased. The lease agreement 

commenced on February 1, 2015 and will expire on March 30, 2025.

Of our operating service locations, three are owned by us and the remaining locations are in leased facilities. Most of our operating service 

locations are located in general commercial office space. Generally, the leases have initial terms of one year, but range from one to five 

years. Most of the leases either contain multiple options to extend the lease period in one-year increments or convert to a month-to-month 

lease upon the expiration of the initial term.

Fourteen of our LTACHs are HWHs, meaning we have a lease or sublease for space with the host hospital. Generally, our leases or 

subleases for LTACHs have initial terms of five years, but range from three to ten years. Most of our leases and subleases for our LTACHs 

contain multiple options to extend the term in one-year increments.

05759-LHC.indd   41

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

41

LHC GROUP

The following table shows the locations of our home health, hospice, community-based services, and facility-based services facilities by 

state as of December 31, 2017:

Home Health  Hospice 
Services 

Services 

Community-  Facility-Based

Based Services 

Services

Louisiana 
Mississippi 
Tennessee 
Kentucky 
Alabama 
Arkansas 
West Virginia 
Texas 
Maryland 
Virginia 
Washington 
Illinois 
Georgia 
Pennsylvania 
North Carolina 
Arizona 
Colorado 
Michigan 
Idaho 
Florida 
Oregon 
Ohio 
California 
Missouri 
South Carolina 
Rhode Island 
Wisconsin 

44
35
33
30
27
20
18
14
11
9
9
9
8
8
6
6
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
1
1
1
1

318

11
11
7
—
7
7
4
3
—
4
4
—
11
1
5
1
—
3
2
—
—
1
—
5
4
—
—

91

—
—
1
2
—
1
—
1
1
—
1
—
—
—
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
—
—
—

12

14
—
—
—
—
3
—
3
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

21

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We provide services in a highly regulated industry and are a party to various proceedings (regulatory and other governmental), and internal 

audits and investigations in the ordinary course of business (including audits by Zone Program Integrity Contractors (“ZPICs”), Recovery 

Audit Contractors (“RACs”), and investigations resulting from our obligation to self-report suspected violations of law). We cannot predict 

the ultimate outcome of any regulatory and other governmental and internal audits and investigations. While such audits and investigations 

are the subject of administrative appeals, the appeals process, even if successful, may take several years to resolve. The Department of 

Justice, CMS, or other federal and state enforcement and regulatory agencies may conduct additional investigations related to our 

businesses in the future. These audits and investigations have caused and could potentially continue to cause delays in collections and 

recoupments from governmental payors. Currently, the Company has recorded $16.9 million in other assets, which are from government 

payors related to the disputed finding of pending ZPIC audits. Additionally, these audits may subject us to sanctions, damages, 

extrapolation of damage findings, additional recoupments, fines, and other penalties (some of which may not be covered by insurance), 

which may, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

42

Form 10-K Part I

05759-LHC.indd   42

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

On January 18, 2018, Jordan Rosenblatt, a purported shareholder of Almost Family, Inc. (“Almost Family”) filed a complaint for Violations 

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, styled Rosenblatt v. Almost 

Family, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-40-TBR (the “Rosenblatt Action”). The Rosenblatt Action was filed against the Company, Almost 

Family, Almost Family’s board of directors, and Hammer Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”). The complaint in the Rosenblatt Action 

(“Complaint”) asserts that the Form S-4 Registration Statement (“Registration Statement”) filed on December 21, 2017 contains false and 

misleading statements with respect to the Merger. The Complaint asserts claims against Almost Family and its board of directors for 

violations of Section 14(a) of the 1934 Act in connection with the dissemination of the Registration Statement, and asserts claims against 

the Almost Family board of directors and the Company for violations of Section 20(a) of the 1934 Act as controlling persons of Almost 

Family. The Rosenblatt Action seeks, among other things, an injunction enjoining the Merger from closing and an award of attorneys’ fees 

and costs.

In addition to the Rosenblatt Action, two additional complaints were filed against Almost Family in the United States District Court for  

the District of Delaware alleging similar violations as the Rosenblatt Action. While the Company is not named as a party in either of these 

additional complaints, these additional complaints also seek, among other things, an injunction enjoining both the vote of the Almost 

Family stockholders with respect to the Merger and the closing of the Merger, monetary damages and an award of attorneys’ fees and 

costs from Almost Family.

We believe that the claims asserted in these lawsuits are entirely without merit and intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously.

We are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation cannot be 

predicted with certainty, we believe the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse affect, after considering the effect of 

our insurance coverage, on our consolidated financial information.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

05759-LHC.indd   43

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I

43

LHC GROUP

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and  
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Sales of Unregistered Common Stock

None.

Market Information and Holders

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “LHCG.” As of February 23, 2018, there 

were approximately 254 registered holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering in 2005 and do not anticipate paying dividends in 

the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to support the development and growth of our business. 

Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and subject to any requirements under our credit 

facility or any future debt instruments.

Price Range of Common Stock

The following table provides the high and low prices of our common stock during each quarter in 2017 and 2016 as quoted by NASDAQ:

2017

Fourth Quarter 

  Third Quarter 
  Second Quarter 
  First Quarter 

2016
  Fourth Quarter 
  Third Quarter 
  Second Quarter 
  First Quarter 

High 

Low

$ 72.07 
  70.92 
  68.35 
  54.10 

$ 45.70 
  46.51 
  43.67 
  44.10 

$ 59.70
  57.72
  51.76
  44.64

$ 32.48
  34.90
  35.05
  33.55

The closing price of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ on February 26, 2018 was $64.97.

Performance Graph

This item is incorporated by reference from our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

44

Form 10-K Part I I

05759-LHC.indd   44

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The selected consolidated financial data presented below is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for each of the 

years in the five year period ended December 31, 2017. The financial data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 

should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related Notes included in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion 

and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included herein 

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data).

Year Ended December 31, 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

Net service revenue 

  Gross margin 
  Operating income 
  Net income 

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s  

common stockholders 

  Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s  

  common stockholders:
  Basic 
  Diluted 

  Weighted average shares outstanding:

  Basic 
  Diluted 

$ 1,072,086 
396,276 
74,682 
60,386

$ 914,823
  357,173 
  70,562 
45,942

$ 816,366 
  335,488 
  66,343 
41,650 

$ 733,632 
  298,857 
  45,486 
  28,752

$ 658,283
  274,819
  46,737
29,146

50,112 

  36,583 

  32,335 

  21,837 

  22,342

$ 
$ 

2.83 
2.79 

$ 
$ 

2.08 
2.07 

$ 
$ 

1.86 
1.84 

$ 
$ 

1.27
1.26 

$ 
$ 

1.31
1.30

  17,715,992 
  17,961,018 

  17,559,477 
  17,682,820 

 17,405,379 
 17,547,531 

  17,229,026 
  17,315,333 

 17,049,794
 17,132,751

As of December 31, 

2017 

2016 

2015 

2014 

2013

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Cash  

  Total assets 
  Total debt 
  Total LHC Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity 

$ 

2,849
793,702 
144,286 
448,868 

$  3,264
  614,071 
  87,796 
  395,126 

$  6,139 
  566,054 
  98,784 
  354,582 

$ 
531
  491,739 
  61,008 
  318,639 

$  14,104
  422,226
  23,212
  293,009

05759-LHC.indd   45

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I I

45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements about future revenues, operating results, plans and expectations. 

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant risks and 

uncertainties and our results could differ materially from the results anticipated by our forward-looking statements as a result of many 

known or unknown factors, including, but not limited to, those factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors. Also, please read  

the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” set forth at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, read the following discussion in conjunction with Part 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as our Consolidated 

Financial Statements and the related Notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We provide post-acute health care services primarily to Medicare beneficiaries throughout the United States, through our home health 

agencies, hospice agencies, community-based services agencies, and long-term acute care hospitals. Our net service revenue increased 

$157.3 million to $1,072.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2017 from $914.8 million for the year ending December 31, 2016. 

During 2017, we acquired 77 agencies, such that, as of December 31, 2017, we operated 442 locations in 27 states within the 

continental United States.

Segments

Our services are classified into four segments: (1) home health services, (2) hospice services, (3) community-based services, and  

(4) facility-based services offered primarily through our LTACHs.

Through our home health services segment we offer a wide range of services, including skilled nursing, medically-oriented social services, 

and physical, occupational and speech therapy. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 318 home health service locations, of which  

159 are wholly-owned by us, 153 are majority-owned or controlled by us through equity joint ventures, three are controlled by us through 

license lease arrangements and the remaining three are only managed by us.

Through our hospice services segment, we offer a wide range of services, including pain and symptom management, emotional and 

spiritual support, inpatient and respite care, homemaker services, and counseling. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 91 hospice 

locations, of which 45 are wholly-owned by us, 44 are majority-owned by us through equity joint ventures and two are controlled by us 

through license lease arrangements.

Through our community-based services segment, our services are performed by paraprofessional personnel, and include assistance  

to elderly, chronically ill, and disabled patients with activities of daily living. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 12 community-based 

services locations, of which 10 are wholly-owned and two are majority-owned through an equity joint venture.

We provide facility-based services principally through our LTACHs. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 11 LTACHs with 15 locations, 

of which all but one are located within host hospitals. We also operate two pharmacies, a family health center, a rural health clinic, and  

two physical therapy clinics. Of these 21 facility-based services locations as of December 31, 2017, eight are wholly-owned by us, 12 are 

controlled by us through equity joint ventures, and one is managed by us.

The percentage of net service revenue contributed from each reporting segment for the each of the periods ended December 31, 2017, 

2016 and 2015 was as follows:

Type of Segment 

Home Health Services 
Hospice Services 
Community-Based Services 
Facility-Based Services 

2017 

73.1% 
14.8
4.4
7.7

2016 

72.8%
14.8
4.8
7.6

2015

75.1%
10.5
5.1
9.3

100.0% 

  100.0%

100.0%

46

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   46

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Development Activities

The following table provides a summary of our acquisitions, divestitures and internal development activities from January 1, 2015 through 

December 31, 2017. This table does not include the three management services agreements under which we manage the operations  

of three home nursing agencies and one LTACH, through our home health services segment or facility-based services segment, nor does 

it include our pharmacies, family health center, rural health clinic, physical therapy clinics through our facility-based services segment.

Total at January 1, 2015 

Developed 
Acquired 
Divested/Merged 

Total at December 31, 2015 

Developed 
Acquired 
Divested/Merged 

Total at December 31, 2016 

Developed 
Acquired 
Divested/Merged 

Total at December 31, 2017 

Recent Developments

Proposed Merger with Almost Family

Home Health  
Agencies 

Hospice 
Agencies 

Community- 
Based 
 Agencies  

Long-Term
Acute Care
Hospitals

277
—
9
(6) 

280
5
12
(16) 

281
3
43
(12) 

315

38
2
17
(1) 

56
1
10
(2) 

65
1
27
(2) 

91

12
—
2
(1) 

13
—
1
(3) 

11
—
1
—

12

8
—
—
—

8
—
—
—

8
—
6
—

14

On November 15, 2017, we announced our entry into the Merger Agreement with Almost Family, providing for a “merger of equals” 

business combination of the Company and Almost Family. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into 

Almost Family, with Almost Family continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The 

Merger is expected to close on April 1, 2018, subject to the approval of both companies’ stockholders and the satisfaction of other 

customary closing conditions.

The proposed Merger would create a nationwide provider of in-home healthcare services with a long track record of successfully 

partnering with hospitals and health systems led by the most experienced management teams in home health. The name of the combined 

company will continue to be LHC Group, Inc. and the common stock of the combined company will continue to trade on NASDAQ 

under the ticker symbol, “LHCG.”

Additional information concerning the proposed transaction is included in the definitive proxy statement/prospectus, which was filed with 

the SEC on February 13, 2018, and can be accessed on the SEC’s website.

Home Health Services

On April 14, 2015, legislation was passed which limits any increase in home health payments to 1% for fiscal year 2018 and extended the 

3% rural home health safeguard for two years through December 31, 2017.

On October 30, 2016, CMS released a Final Rule (effective January 1, 2017) regarding payment rates for home health services provided 

during calendar year 2017. The national, standardized 60-day episode payment rate increased to $2,989.97 for 2017. The rural rate  

is $3,079.67. The Final Rule implements the final year of the four year phase-in of the rebasing adjustments to the national, standardized 

60-day episode payment rate and the decrease of 0.97% to account for nominal case-mix growth between calendar year 2012  

and calendar year 2014, which was not accounted for in the rebasing adjustments finalized in calendar year 2014. The Final Rule also 

contains minor adjustments to the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (“HHVBP”) program and to the home health quality reporting 

program. CMS estimates the overall economic impact of the proposed rule’s policy changes and payment rate update is an estimated 

aggregate decrease of 0.7% in payments to home health agencies, which decrease will vary based on each agency’s wage index and 

patient mix weight.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

47

05759-LHC.indd   47

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

In addition, CMS finalized its proposal to implement a Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (“HHVBP”) program that is intended to 

incentivize the delivery of high-quality patient care. The HHVBP program would withhold 3% to 8% of Medicare payments, which would 

be redistributed to participating home health agencies depending on their performance relative to specified measures. The HHVBP 

would apply to all home health agencies in Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Massachusetts, Maryland, Nebraska, North Carolina, Tennessee, and 

Washington effective January 1, 2018.

On November 1, 2017, CMS released the Final Rule (effective January 1, 2018) regarding payment rates for home health services 

provided during calendar year 2018. The national, standardized 60-day episode payment rate will increase to $3,039.64 in 2018.  

The Final Rule estimates an impact of 0.5% reduction in payments due to the expiration of the rural add-on provision, a 1% home health 

payment update percentage, and 0.97% adjustment for case mix (the third year of a three year adjustment). CMS also estimates  

a reduction in regulatory reporting due to the removal of a number of quality measures and OASIS items. CMS estimates the overall 

economic impact of the Final Rule’s changes and payment rate update is an estimated decrease of 0.4% in payments to home health 

agencies. In addition, CMS decided not to finalize its rule on the Home Health Groupings Model (“HHGM”) as was proposed, but instead 

will take additional time to further engage with stakeholders to move towards a system that shifts the focus from volume of services to  

a more patient-centered model.

The BBA 2018 included the following provisions impacting our home health business:

•  A new case mix model

•  Mandates the development of a new case mix model in a transparent process involving CMS, the home health industry, and the 

Congressional committees of jurisdiction.

•  The new model will use a 30-day payment period (leaving intact the 60-day assessment and order process), and must be 

implemented in a budget-neutral manner beginning in 2020 and will not include the use of therapy visits as a determinant. 

Congressional Budget Office (“CBO”) scored this at zero savings and zero cost due to the budget-neutrality requirement.

•  CMS is specifically instructed to consider the use of alternative payment reform recommendations like the “Risk Based Grouper 

Model” proposed in lieu of the Home Health Groupings Model (“HHGM”) proposed in the preliminary rule.

•  The new model must be developed on a budget-neutral basis as opposed to the HHGM, which was proposed on a non-budget-

neutral basis in the preliminary rule. Further, any behavioral adjustments must now be transparent and subject to public notice, 

comment, and the rule-making process. The HHGM, as proposed, footnoted a reference to behavioral adjustments that were not 

defined and not transparent in its underlying assumptions period in 2017.

•  Restoration of the 3% rural add-on

•  Restores the 3% home health rate add-on for home health patients who reside in rural geographies, effective January 1, 2018. 

The add-on rate will be phased downward over a five-year period following a formula specified in the legislation.

•  Restores an important protection of access to Medicare home health care for rural America, and provides sufficient time for the 

industry to produce additional compelling evidence to demonstrate the positive impact of the rural add-on payment to rural 

Medicare beneficiaries.

•  Since its inception, the rural rate has been repeatedly renewed by Congress in recognition of the continued need.

•  Face-to-face documentation improvements allowing the home health medical record in its entirety to be used in support of the 

physician’s attestation of medical necessity.

•  A study is to be conducted by the GAO (Government Accounting Office) on Medicare improvements to address the needs of the 

chronically ill through healthcare services provided at home, including interdisciplinary care management, tele-health, and tele-

monitoring for Medicare Advantage plans, requiring states to better integrate Medicare and Medicaid services for the dually-eligible,  

and the extension and expansion of the Independence at Home Demonstration Program.

•  A specific market basket update percentage of 1.5% for fiscal year 2020, leaving intact the full market basket update (generally 

expected to be between 2-3%) for fiscal year 2019. Suspends the productivity adjustment in 2020.

•  Repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, effective upon passage.

•  Payment rate feasibility study to be conducted concerning the feasibility of a higher payment rate for providers, including home health 

providers that engage in the management of patients’ chronic conditions.

48

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   48

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Hospice

On July 29, 2016, CMS issued a Final Rule updating Medicare payment rates and the wage index for hospices for fiscal year 2017, 

which resulted in a 2.1% increase in payment rates. The 2.1% increase is based on 2.7% inpatient hospital market basket update, 

reduced by a 0.3% productivity adjustment, and a 0.3% adjustment set by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”). 

The hospice cap amount for the 2017 hospice cap year will be $28,404.99. The following table shows the hospice Medicare payment 

rates for fiscal year 2017, which began on October 1, 2016 and ended September 30, 2017:

Description 

Routine Home Care days 1-60 
Routine Home Care days 61+ 
Continuous Home Care 
  Full Rate = 24 hours of care
  $40.19 = hourly rate
Inpatient Respite Care 
General Inpatient Care 

Rate Per Patient Day

$ 190.55
$ 149.82
$ 964.63

$ 170.97
$ 734.94

On August 1, 2017, CMS issued a Final Rule updating Medicare payment rates and the wage index for hospices for fiscal year 2018. The 

result will be a 1.0% increase in payment rates due to the provisions of Section 411 (d) of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization 

Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-10) (“MACRA”). The hospice cap will be $28,689.04, which is a 1% increase. The Final Rule finalizes eight 

measures from Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (“CAHPS”) Hospice Survey data already submitted by hospices. 

The rule also finalizes the extension of the exception for quality reporting purposes from 30 calendar days to 90 calendar days after the 

date that an extraordinary circumstance occurred. CMS began public reporting Hospice Quality Reporting Program (“HQRP”) data via a 

Hospice Compare Site in August 2017 to help customers make informed choices. Hospices that fail to meet quality reporting 

requirements will receive a two percentage point reduction to their payments. The following table shows the hospice Medicare payment 

rates for fiscal year 2018, which began on October 1, 2017 and will end September 30, 2018:

Description 

Routine Home Care days 1-60 
Routine Home Care days 61+ 
Continuous Home Care 
  Full Rate = 24 hours of care
  $40.19 = hourly rate
Inpatient Respite Care 
General Inpatient Care 

Rate Per Patient Day

$ 192.78
$ 151.41
$ 976.42

$ 172.78
$ 743.55

The BBA 2018 included the following provisions impacting our hospice business:

•  Hospice included in Hospital Post-Acute Transfer Policy for early discharges to hospice care. Hospice will be included as a post-acute 

service subject to the transfer DRG policy, in which acute-care hospitals receive a reduction in payments if they transfer a patient to 

post-acute care prior to achieving the mean length of stay for the DRG. Currently, home health, skilled nursing facilities, and LTACHs 

are included within the policy, and the BBA 2018 adds hospice as a post-acute provider subject to the policy.

Physician Assistants recognized as attending physicians to serve hospice patients, effective January 1, 2019.

Community-Based Services

Community-based services are in-home care services, which are primarily performed by skilled nursing and paraprofessional personnel, 

and include assistance with activities of daily living to elderly, chronically ill, and disabled patients. Revenue is generated on an hourly basis 

and our current primary payors are TennCare Managed Care Organization and Medicaid. Approximately 70% of our net service revenue 

for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 in this segment was generated by our locations in Tennessee.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

49

05759-LHC.indd   49

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Facility-Based Services

On December 26, 2013, President Obama signed into law the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-67). This law prevents  

a scheduled payment reduction for physicians and other practitioners who treat Medicare patients from taking effect on January 1, 2014. 

Included in the legislation are the following changes to LTACH reimbursement:

•  Medicare discharges from LTACHs will continue to be paid at full LTACH PPS rates if:

•  the patient spent at least three days in a short-term care hospital (“STCH”) intensive care unit (“ICU”) during a STCH stay that 

immediately preceded the LTACH stay, or

•  the patient was on a ventilator for more than 96 hours in the LTACH (based on the MS-LTACH DRG assigned) and had a STCH stay 

immediately preceding the LTACH stay.

•  Also, the LTACH discharge cannot have a principal diagnosis that is psychiatric or rehabilitation.

•  All other Medicare discharges from LTACHs will be paid at a new “site neutral” rate, which is the lesser of the (“IPPS”) comparable  

per diem amount determined using the formula in the short-stay outlier regulation at 42 C.F.R. § 412.529(d)(4) plus applicable outlier 

payments, or 100% of the estimated cost of the services involved.

•  The above new payment policy will be effective for LTACH cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015, and the site 

neutral payment rate will be phased-in over two years.

•  For cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2015, discharges paid at the site neutral payment rate or by a Medicare 

Advantage plan (Part C) will be excluded from the LTACH average length-of-stay (“ALOS”) calculation.

•  For cost reporting periods beginning in fiscal year 2016 and later, CMS will notify LTACHs of their “LTACH discharge payment 

percentage” (i.e., the number of discharges not paid at the site neutral payment rate divided by the total number of discharges).

•  For cost reporting periods beginning in fiscal year 2020 and later, LTACHs with less than 50% of their discharges paid at the full LTACH 

PPS rates will be switched to payment under the IPPS for all discharges in subsequent cost reporting periods. However, CMS will set 

up a process for LTACHs to seek reinstatement of LTACH PPS rates for applicable discharges.

•  MedPAC will study the impact of the above changes on quality of care, use of hospice and other post-acute care settings, different 

types of LTACHs and growth in Medicare spending on LTACHs. MedPAC is to submit a report to Congress with any recommendations 

by June 30, 2019. The report is to also include MedPAC’s assessment of whether the 25 Percent rule should continue to be applied.

On August 2, 2016, CMS released the Final Rule to update fiscal year 2017 LTACH reimbursement and policies under the LTACH PPS, 

which affects discharges occurring in cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2016. CMS projects that overall LTACH PPS 

spending will decrease by 7.1% compared to fiscal year 2016 payments. This estimated decrease is attributable to the statutory 

decrease in payment rates for site neutral LTACH PPS cases that do not meet the clinical criteria to qualify for higher LTACH rates in cost 

reporting years beginning on or after October 1, 2016. Cases that do qualify for higher LTACH PPS rates will see a payment rate increase 

of 0.7% (including a market basket update of 2.8% reduced by a multi-factor productivity adjustment of 0.3%, minus an additional 

adjustment of 0.75 percentage point in accordance with the PPACA, for a net market basket of 1.75%). The LTACH PPS standard federal 

payment rate for fiscal year 2017 is $42,476.41 (increased from $41,762.85 in fiscal year 2016). Site-neutral discharges will have a  

23% reduction in payments. CMS also proposes to begin enforcement of the 25 Percent rule which will cap the number of patients 

treated at an LTACH who have been referred from all locations of a hospital. Grandfathered LTACH facilities are exempt from the 25 Percent 

rule, while rural LTACHs will have a threshold of 50% and MSA-dominant hospitals will have a threshold between 25% and 50%. The  

25 Percent rule will apply to discharges occurring after October 1, 2016. CMS will have two separate outlier pools and thresholds for 

LTACH-appropriate patients and for site-neutral patients. For 2017, CMS finalized an increase of its fixed-loss threshold to $21,943  

from 2016’s $16,423, to limit outlier spending at no more than 8% of total LTACH spending (2016 outlier payments may reach 9.0%). 

CMS is applying the proposed inpatient fixed-loss threshold of $23,570 for site neutral patients. CMS also finalized four new measures  

for the LTACH Quality Reporting Program to meet the requirements of the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) 

Act. For the fiscal year 2018 LTACH Quality Reporting Program, CMS added quality measures for Medicare spending per beneficiary, 

discharge to community and potentially-preventable 30-day post-discharge readmissions. For the fiscal year 2020 LTACH Quality 

Reporting Program, CMS adopted a new drug regimen review measure.

50

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   50

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

On December 7, 2016, Congress passed the 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures”), which boosts funding for medical research, eases the 

development and approval of experimental treatments and reforms federal policy on mental health care. Included in the bill was relief for 

LTACHs under a one year moratorium on the 25 Percent Rule, which would otherwise penalize LTACHs that admit more than 25% of  

their patients from a particular acute care hospital. As modified by Cures, implementation of the 25 Percent Rule will be suspended during 

federal fiscal year 2017 (October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017).

On August 2, 2017, CMS posted a display copy of its final rule for the annual update to Medicare payment rates and policies for the 

Fiscal Year 2018 inpatient hospitals prospective payment system and the LTACH PPS. CMS estimates the impact of the proposed rule will 

result in a 2.4% overall reduction in LTACH spending. The LTACH standard federal rate is reduced to $41,430.56 from $42,476.41. 

CMS is also proposing a 12 month administrative moratorium on application of the 25 Percent Rule beginning with the expiration of the 

statutory moratorium after September 30, 2017. The 25 Percent Rule will not be applied to LTACHs for discharges occurring on or 

before September 30, 2018. CMS also adopted certain adjustments to high cost outlier and short stay outlier policies. CMS finalized its 

proposal for a new severe wound exception to be paid at standard Federal LTACH rates instead of site neutral payments for grandfathered 

LTACHs. CMS changed the separateness and control restrictions for certain co-located IPPS-exempt hospitals. The Final Rule also  

adds three new quality measures and discontinues two quality measures. CMS also finalized its proposal to implement collection of 

standardized patient assessment data under the IMPACT Act on functional status, cognitive function, cancer treatments, respiratory 

treatments, transfusions and other special services effective for admissions on/after April 1, 2019.

Effects of BBA 2018 on LTACHS

The impact of BBA 2018 on our LTACH business includes a two-year extension of site-neutral blended payments rates for certain 

long-term care hospital discharges, based upon a 4.6% reduction in site-neutral payments over 7 years.

None of the aforementioned estimated changes to Medicare payments for home health, hospice, and LTACHs include the deficit reduction 

sequester cuts to Medicare that began on April 1, 2013, which reduced Medicare payments by 2% for patients whose service dates 

ended on or after April 1, 2013.

2017 and 2016 Operational Data

The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, each of our segment’s data regarding census, admissions, billable hours and 

patient days:

Home Health Services:

Average census 

  Average Medicare census 
  Admissions 
  Medicare admissions 

Hospice Services:
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Admissions 
  Medicare admissions 
  Patient days 

Community-Based Services:
  Billable hours 

LTACHs:
  Patient days 

Three Months 

Three Months 

Three Months 

Three Months

Ended March 31,    Ended June 30,   Ended Sept. 30,   Ended Dec. 31, 

2017 

2017 

2017 

2017

41,874
  29,244 
  47,375 
  29,957 

  2,861 
  2,650 
  3,112 
  2,657 
 257,474 

43,395
  29,743 
  47,625 
  29,868 

  3,031 
  2,803 
  3,227 
  2,791 
 275,866 

43,450 
  29,691 
  47,841 
  29,964 

  3,108 
  2,888 
  3,438 
  2,967 
 285,971 

  44,362
  29,925
  49,668
  30,745

  3,180
  2,959
  3,655
  3,199
 292,568

 344,186 

 342,337 

 369,700 

 469,963

  13,732 

  13,075 

  14,599 

  21,719

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

51

05759-LHC.indd   51

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Home Health Services:

Average census 

  Average Medicare census 
  Admissions 
  Medicare admissions 

Hospice Services:
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Admissions 
  Medicare admissions 
  Patient days 

Community-Based Services:
  Billable hours 

LTACHs:
  Patient days 

Three Months 

Three Months 

Three Months 

Three Months

Ended March 31,    Ended June 30,   Ended Sept. 30,   Ended Dec. 31, 

2016 

2016 

2016 

2016

38,218
  28,246 
  39,124 
  26,136 

  2,425 
  2,248 
  2,463 
  2,152 
 220,694 

38,357
  28,046 
  38,949 
  25,817 

  2,615 
  2,431 
  2,523 
  2,246 
 237,968 

38,511 
  27,983 
  40,657 
  26,810 

  2,736 
  2,547 
  2,554 
  2,266 
 251,753 

  39,407
  28,381
  41,184
  26,812

  2,713
  2,520
  2,607
  2,218
 249,608

 304,487 

 330,350 

 354,998 

 349,053

  15,537 

  13,929 

  13,499 

  13,257

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, our consolidated results (amounts in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 

Consolidated Services Data:

Net service revenue 
  Cost of service revenue 

  Gross margin 
  Provision for bad debts 
  General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 

  Loss on disposal of assets 

  Operating income 
Interest expense 

  Non-operating income 
Income tax expense 
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests 

2017 

2016 

2015

$ 1,072,086 
675,810 

396,276 
9,484 
310,539 
1,511 
60 

74,682 
(3,876) 
524 
10,944 
10,274 

$ 914,823
  557,650 

  357,173 
  14,790 
  270,622 
— 
1,199 

  70,562 
(2,936) 
492 
  22,176 
9,359 

$ 816,366
  480,878

  335,488
  19,243
  247,919
1,273
710

  66,343
(2,302)
457
  22,848
9,315

Net income available to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders  

$ 

50,112 

$  36,583

$  32,335

52

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   52

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

The following table sets forth our consolidated results as a percentage of net service revenue, except income tax expense, which is 

presented as a percentage of income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Year Ended December 31, 

2017 

2016 

2015

Consolidated Services Data:
Cost of service revenue 

  Gross margin 
  Provision for bad debts 
  General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 

  Loss on disposal of assets 
  Operating income 
Interest expense 

  Non-operating income 
Income tax expense 
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests 

  Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 

63.0% 
37.0 
0.9 
29.0 
0.1 
— 
7.0 
(0.4) 
— 
17.9 
1.0 
4.7 

61.0% 
39.0 
1.6 
29.6 
— 
0.1 
7.7 
(0.3) 
0.1 
37.7 
1.0 
4.0 

58.9%
41.1
2.4
30.4
0.2
0.1
8.1
(0.3)
0.1
41.4
1.1
4.0

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Consolidated net service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1.1 billion compared to $914.8 million for the same period 

in 2016, an increase of $157.3 million, or 17.2%. Consolidated net service revenue growth in 2017 was primarily due to both our 

acquisitions of 77 agencies during 2017 and an increase in same store growth in our home health services segment. Consolidated net 

service revenue was comprised of the following for the periods ending December 31:

Type of Segment 

Home Health Services 
Hospice Services 
Community-Based Services 
Facility-Based Services 

2017 

2016

73.1% 
14.8
4.4
7.7

72.8%
14.8
4.8
7.6

100.0% 

  100.0%

Revenue derived from Medicare represented 71.0% and 74.5% of our consolidated net service revenue for the years ended December 31, 

2017 and 2016, respectively.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

53

05759-LHC.indd   53

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

The following table sets forth each of our segment’s revenue growth or loss, admissions, census, episodes, billable hours, and patient 

days for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and the related change from the same period in 2016 (amounts in thousands, 

except admissions, census, episode data, billable hours and patient days):

Home Health Services

Revenue 

  Revenue Medicare 
  New admissions 
  New Medicare admissions 
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Home health episodes 

Hospice Services

Revenue 

  Revenue Medicare 
  New admissions 
  New Medicare admissions 
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Patient days 

Community-Based Services

Revenue 

  Billable hours 

Facility-Based Services

LTACHs

Revenue 
  Patient days 

Same Store  (1)

De Novo (2)

Organic  (3)

Organic 
Growth 
(Loss) % Acquired (4)

Total

  Growth
(Loss) %

Total

$  732,436 
$  529,618 
  177,028 
  111,266 
40,211 
27,779 
  201,420 

$  133,637 
$  125,249 
10,222 
8,853 
2,529 
2,342 
  963,591 

$ 
$ 

68 
68 
1 
1 
3 
2 
  — 

$  412 
$  367 
18 
12 
7 
7 
  2,676 

$  732,504 
$  529,686 
  177,029 
  111,267 
40,214 
27,781 
  201,420 

$  134,049 
$  125,616 
10,240 
8,865 
2,536 
2,349 
  966,267 

10.0% 
4.7 
10.7 
5.4 
4.2 
(1.3) 
1.1 

(0.7) 
(0.2) 
2.5 
1.2 
(3.2) 
(3.5) 
0.8 

$  51,003 
$  32,697 
  15,087 
8,910 
2,893 
1,733 
  11,835 

$  25,148 
$  21,427 
3,129 
2,693 
500 
468 
  142,056 

$  783,507 
$  562,383 
192,116 
120,177 
43,107 
29,514 
213,255 

$  159,197 
$  147,043 
13,369 
11,558 
3,036 
2,817 
  1,108,323 

17.7%
11.1
20.1
13.8
11.7
4.9
7.0

18.0
16.8
33.9
31.9
15.9
15.7
15.6

$  43,560 
  1,527,255 

$  — 
  — 

$  43,560 
  1,527,255 

(0.8)% 
2.9% 

$  3,349 
  117,117 

$ 
46,909 
  1,644,372 

6.9%
10.8%

$  61,085 
53,916 

$  — 
  — 

$  61,085 
53,916 

(6.2) 
(4.1) 

$  11,688 
9,252 

$ 

72,773 
63,168 

11.7%
12.4

(1)  Same store – location that has been in service with us for greater than 12 months.

(2)  De Novo – internally developed location that has been in service for 12 months or less.

(3)  Organic – combination of same store and de novo.

(4)  Acquired – purchased location that has been in service with us 12 months or less.

Total home health organic revenue and patient metrics increased due to market share growth in service areas where we have quality 

scores greater than 4 stars. Total organic revenue and patient days decreased in our facility-based services segment due to the negative 

impact from the reduction of 18 beds in one LTACH location. In addition, patient criteria changes went into effect for two of our LTACH 

locations on June 1, 2016 and six of our LTACH locations on September 1, 2016. The criteria changes are reflective in our decrease of 

revenue per patient day.

Organic growth is primarily generated by population growth in areas covered by mature agencies and by increased market share in 

acquired and developing agencies. Historically, acquired agencies have the highest growth in admissions and average census in the first 

24 months after acquisition, and have the highest contribution to organic growth, measured as a percentage of growth, in the second  

full year of operation after the acquisition.

Cost of Service Revenue

Consolidated cost of service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $675.8 million compared to $557.7 million for the 

same period in 2016, an increase of approximately $118.1 million, or 21.2%; however, as a percentage of net service revenue, it is an 

increase of 2.0%.

54

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   54

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table summarizes cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands, except percentages, which are percentages of the 

segment’s respective net service revenue):

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Home Health Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Hospice Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Community-Based Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Facility-Based Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

2017 

2016 

$ 438,856
24,550
18,773

$ 482,179

$  73,621
6,146
24,202

$ 103,969

$  34,642
335
267

$  35,244

$  38,303
267
15,848

$  54,418

56.0% 
3.1
2.4

61.5% 

46.2% 
3.9
15.2

65.3% 

73.8% 
0.7
0.6

75.1% 

46.4% 
0.3
19.2

66.0% 

$ 360,378
22,252
15,820

$ 398,450

$  58,094
5,384
19,881

$  83,359

$  32,086
263
254

$  32,603

$  28,802
233
14,203

$  43,238

54.1%
3.3
2.4

59.8%

43.0%
4.0
14.7

61.8%

73.1%
0.6
0.6

74.3%

41.1%
0.3
20.3

61.7%

Consolidated cost of service revenue variances were as follows:

•  Home Health Segment – Cost of service revenue increased as a percentage of net service revenue due in part to 2.0% Medicare 

reimbursement cuts recognized in 2017. Additionally, acquisitions accounted for $44.9 million of the $83.7 million increase, with the 

remaining difference caused by the growth in our same store agencies.

•  Hospice Segment – Acquisitions accounted for $19.1 million of the $20.6 million increase. Cost of service revenue increased as a 

percentage of net service revenue due to the decline in same store census during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.

•  Community-Based Services Segment – Acquisitions accounted for the $2.6 million increase.

•  Facility-Based Services Segment – Acquisitions accounted for $11.8 million in cost of service revenue for the year. This amount was 

offset by a decrease in cost of service revenue for one LTACH location that had a reduction of beds during 2016. Cost of service 

revenue increased as a percentage of net service revenue due to lower revenue per patient day for the period caused by patient criteria 

changes that went into effect in June 2016 and September 2016.

Provision for Bad Debts

Consolidated provision for bad debts for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $9.5 million, or 0.9% of net service revenue, compared 

to $14.8 million, or 1.6% of net service revenue, for the same period in 2016, a decrease of approximately $5.3 million, or 35.9%; 

however, as a percentage of net service revenue, it is a decrease of 0.7%. The Company continues to have more timely cash collections, 

increases in amounts collected, and improvements in the health of our overall accounts receivable agings. The continued maturity of  

our back office and field operations, use of our point-of-care platform, and use of other technology advancements in reporting and 

analytics are drivers of our collection improvements. We also continue to see high success rates in the appeal process for Additional 

Documentation Request’s or ADRs at each stage of the appeal process, often times in cases where the receivables have significantly aged.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

55

05759-LHC.indd   55

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LHC GROUP

General and Administrative Expenses

Consolidated general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $310.5 million compared to $270.6 million 

for the same period in 2016, an increase of approximately $39.9 million, or 14.8%; however, as a percentage of net service revenue, it  

is a decrease of 0.6%. Of the $39.9 million increase, acquisitions accounted for $32.2 million, with the remainder of the increase attributable 

to growth in our same store agencies.

The following table summarizes general and administrative expenses (amounts in thousands, except percentages, which are percentages 

of the segment’s respective net service revenue):

Home Health Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Hospice Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Community-Based Services
General and administrative 
Depreciation 

Total 

Facility-Based Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Income Tax Expense

2017 

2016 

$ 220,509
8,755

$ 229,264

$  43,102
2,414

$  45,516

$  9,491
455

$  9,946

$  24,015
1,798

$  25,813

28.1% 
1.0

29.3% 

27.1% 
1.5

28.6% 

20.2% 
1.0

21.2% 

29.1% 
2.2

31.3% 

$ 195,591
7,827

$ 203,418

$  35,046
2,161

$  37,207

$  8,380
405

$  8,785

$  19,445
1,767

$  21,212

29.4%
1.1

30.5%

26.0%
1.6

27.6%

19.1%
0.9

20.0%

27.7%
2.5

30.2%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $10.9 million compared to $22.2 million for the same 

period in 2016. The Company adjusted its deferred state income tax rate taking into consideration the federal income tax adjustments 

signed into law on December 22, 2017. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were revalued as of December 31, 2017, which resulted in a 

credit to income tax expense of $14.0 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Net Service Revenue

Consolidated net service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $914.8 million compared to $816.4 million for the same 

period in 2015, an increase of $98.4 million, or 12.0%. Consolidated net service revenue growth in 2016 was primarily due to both our 

acquisitions of 28 agencies during 2015 and an increase in same store growth. Consolidated net service revenue was comprised of the 

following for the periods ending December 31:

Type of Segment 

Home Health Services 
Hospice Services 
Community-Based Services 
Facility-Based Services 

2016 

2015

72.8%
14.8
4.8
7.6

75.1%
10.5
5.1
9.3

100.0%

100.0%

Revenue derived from Medicare represented 74.5% of our consolidated net service revenue for both years ended December 31, 2016 

and 2015.

56

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   56

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table sets forth the growth or loss of each of our segment’s revenue and patient statistical data for the twelve months ended 

December 31, 2016 and the related change for the same period in 2015 (revenue amounts are in thousands):

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Home Health Services

Revenue 

  Revenue Medicare 
  New admissions 
  New Medicare admissions 
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Episodes 

Hospice Services

Revenue 

  Revenue Medicare 
  New admissions 
  New Medicare admissions 
  Average census 
  Average Medicare census 
  Patient days 

Community-Based Services

Revenue 

  Billable hours 

Facility-Based Services

LTACHs

Revenue 
  Patient days 

Same Store  (1)

De Novo (2)

Organic  (3)

Organic 
Growth 
(Loss) % Acquired (4)

Total

  Growth
(Loss) %

Total

$  651,015 
$  494,378 
156,359 
103,175 
37,344 
27,226 
195,057 

$ 
$ 

95,095 
88,852 
7,392 
6,493 
1,668 
1,547 
687,853 

$ 1,158 
$  921 
159 
106 
265 
188 
303 

$ 2,028 
$ 1,985 
55 
48 
68 
66 
 14,564 

$  652,173 
$  495,299 
156,518 
103,281 
37,609 
27,414 
195,360 

$ 
$ 

97,123 
90,837 
7,447 
6,541 
1,736 
1,613 
702,417 

43,734 
$ 
  1,331,448 

$  — 
  — 

43,734 
$ 
  1,331,448 

6.4% 
4.7 
9.3 
6.6 
2.3 
0.4 
2.2 

13.1 
13.8 
9.7 
10.6 
3.6 
3.9 
14.9 

6.1 
9.7 

$  13,723 
$  10,775 
3,396 
2,294 
978 
732 
3,875 

$  37,825 
$  35,047 
2,700 
2,342 
887 
824 
  257,606 

$  665,896 
$  506,074 
159,914 
105,575 
38,587 
28,146 
199,235 

$  134,948 
$  125,884 
10,147 
8,883 
2,623 
2,437 
960,023 

$ 

157 
7,734 

43,891 
$ 
  1,339,182 

8.6%
6.9
11.7
8.9
5.0
3.1
4.2

57.2
57.7
49.5
50.2
56.6
57.0
57.0

6.5
10.3

$ 

64,607 
56,224 

$  — 
  — 

$ 

64,607 
56,224 

(11.1) 
(8.5) 

$ 

— 
— 

$ 

64,607 
56,224 

(10.3)
(8.5)

(1)  Same store – location that has been in service with us for greater than 12 months.

(2)  De Novo – internally developed location that has been in service for 12 months or less.

(3)  Organic – combination of same store and de novo.

(4)  Acquired – purchased location that has been in service with us 12 months or less.

Total organic revenue and patient days decreased in our facility-based services segment due to the negative impact from the reduction  

of 18 beds in one LTACH location. In addition, patient criteria changes went into effect for two of our LTACH locations on June 1, 2016 

and six of our LTACH locations on September 1, 2016. The criteria changes are reflective in our decrease of revenue per patient day.

Organic growth is primarily generated by population growth in areas covered by mature agencies and by increased market share in 

acquired and developing agencies. Historically, acquired agencies have the highest growth in admissions and average census in the first 

24 months after acquisition, and have the highest contribution to organic growth, measured as a percentage of growth, in the second  

full year of operation after the acquisition.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

57

05759-LHC.indd   57

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Cost of Service Revenue

Consolidated cost of service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $557.7 million compared to $480.9 million for the same 

period in 2015, an increase of $76.8 million, or 16.0%.

The following table summarizes cost of service revenue (amounts in thousands, except percentages, which are percentages of the 

segment’s respective net service revenue):

Home Health Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Hospice Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Community-Based Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

Facility-Based Services

Salaries, wages and benefits 
Transportation 
Supplies and services 

Total 

2016 

2015 

$ 360,378
22,252
15,820

54.1%
3.3
2.4

$ 398,450 

  59.8%

$  58,094
5,384
19,881

$  83,359

$  32,086
263
254

$  32,603

$  28,802
233
14,203

$  43,238

43.0%
4.0
14.7

61.8%

73.1%
0.6
0.6

74.3%

41.1%
0.3
20.3

61.7%

$ 320,548
21,056
13,146

$ 354,750

$  35,022
3,638
12,246

$  50,906

28,525
263
288

$  29,076

$  29,898
240
16,008

$  46,146

52.3%
3.4
2.1

57.9%

40.8%
4.2
14.3

59.3%

69.2%
0.6
0.7

70.5%

39.3%
0.3
21.0

60.6%

Consolidated cost of service revenue variances were as follows:

•  Home Health Segment – Cost of service increased as a percentage of net service revenue due in part to 1.5% Medicare reimbursement 

cuts recognized in 2016. Additionally, acquisitions accounted for $7.0 million of the $76.8 million increase, with the remaining difference 

caused by the growth in our same store agencies.

•  Hospice Segment – Acquisitions accounted for $26.3 million of the $76.8 million increase.

•  Community-Based Services Segment – Cost of service revenue increased as a percentage of net service revenue due to an increase  

in labor costs related to providing a higher level of care for our current patient mix.

•  Facility-Based Services Segment – Cost of service revenue increased as a percentage of net service revenue due to the reduction  

of LTACH licensed beds and lower revenue per patient day for the period caused by patient criteria changes that went into effect in 

June and September of 2016.

Provision For Bad Debts

Consolidated provision for bad debts for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $14.8 million, or 1.6% of net service revenue, compared 

to $19.2 million, or 2.4% of net service revenue, for the same period in 2015, a decrease of approximately $4.5 million, or 23.1%. The 

decrease in provision for bad debts was primarily due to continued process improvements in our revenue cycle department that were 

implemented during 2015 and improved cash collections. In addition, provisions for bad debts in 2015 was higher due to claims 

associated with two payors in our home health services segment and delayed payment issues related to our transition to a new billing 

system for our community-based services segment. These issues were resolved.

58

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   58

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

General and Administrative Expenses

Consolidated general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $270.6 million compared to $247.9 million 

for the same period in 2015, an increase of $22.7 million, or 9.2%; however, as a percentage of net service revenue, it is a decrease of 

0.8%. Of the $22.7 million increase: acquisitions accounted for $14.0 million; a severance package of $1.1 million was recorded due to 

the resignation of our prior Chief Financial Officer; the remainder of the increase was due to growth in our same store agencies.

The following table summarizes general and administrative expenses (amounts in thousands, except percentages, which are percentages 

of the segment’s respective net service revenue):

Home Health Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Hospice Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Community-Based Services
General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Facility-Based Services

General and administrative 
Depreciation and amortization 

Total 

Loss on Disposal of Assets

2016 

2015 

$ 195,591 
7,827

  29.4%
1.1

$ 203,418 

  30.5%

$ 182,107
8,484

$ 190,591

$  35,046
2,161

$  37,207

$  8,380
405

$  8,785

$  19,445
1,767

$  21,212

26.0%
1.6

27.6%

19.1%
0.9

20.0%

27.7%
2.5

30.2%

$  24,893
1,544

$  26,437

$  8,309
156

$  8,465

$  20,657
1,769

$  22,426

29.7%
1.4

31.1%

29.0%
1.8

30.8%

20.2%
0.4

20.6%

27.1%
2.3

29.5%

The loss on disposal of assets increased during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 due to the sale of an aircraft. The aircraft 

incurred damage and was subsequently sold at a price below the aircraft’s net book value. The sale generated a loss of $0.9 million, 

which was realized during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash at December 31, 2017 was $2.8 million, compared to $3.3 million at December 31, 2016. Based on our current plan of operations, 

including acquisitions (without giving effect to the Merger), we believe this amount, when combined with expected cash flows from 

operations and amounts available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our growth strategy and to meet our anticipated 

operating expenses, capital expenditures, and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months.

Liquidity

Our principal source of liquidity needed to fund our operating activities is the collection of patient accounts receivable, most of which are 

collected from governmental and third-party commercial payors. We also have the ability to obtain additional liquidity, if necessary, through 

our revolving credit facility, which provides for aggregate borrowings, including outstanding letters of credit, up to $225 million. As of 

December 31, 2017, we had $71.4 million available for borrowing under our credit facility.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

59

05759-LHC.indd   59

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Our reported cash flows are affected by various external and internal factors, including the following:

•  Operating Results – Our net income has a significant effect on our operating cash flows. Any significant increase or decrease in our 

net income could have a material effect on our operating cash flows.

•  Timing of Acquisitions – We use a portion of our operating and/or financing cash flows for acquisitions. When the acquisitions occur 

at or near the end of a period, our cash outflows significantly increase.

•  Timing of Payroll – Our employees are paid bi-weekly on Fridays. Operating cash outflows increase in reporting periods that end 

  on a Friday.

•  Self Insurance Plan Funding – We are self-funded for health insurance and workers compensation insurance. Any significant changes 

in the amount of insurance claims submitted could have a direct effect on our operating cash flows.

Cash used in investing activities primarily relates to acquisitions of home nursing, hospice agencies, and LTACHs, while cash used by 

financing activities primarily relates to payments on outstanding debt agreements and payments to our noncontrolling interest partners.

The following table summarizes changes in cash flows (amounts in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 

Net cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities 
Investing activities 
Financing activities 

2017 

2016

$  32,326

(74,774) 
42,033

$  67,472
  (50,380)
(19,967)

During 2017, the change in operating activities was attributable to:

•  Improved cash collections on our older patient accounts receivable resulting in a decrease of $5.3 million in provision for bad debt.

•  The Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities due to the passage and signing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The 

revaluation caused our deferred taxes to decrease by $13.6 million.

•  The 2016 year end tax payment deadlines were extended to January 2017; this extension caused a timing difference in payments of 

tax estimates, which decreased prepaid income taxes by $8.6 million.

•  The remainder of the change in cash provided by operating activities was due to acquisitions purchased in 2017 and the accretion  

of agencies purchased in 2016.

Cash used in investing activities and financing activities changed due to the difference in volume of acquisition activity occurring between 

2017 and 2016.

Credit Facility

Our revolving credit facility with Capital One, National Association is unsecured and provides for a maximum aggregate principal borrowing 

of $225 million (with a letter of credit sub-limit equal to $15 million), and is scheduled to expire on June 18, 2019. We are required to  

pay a commitment fee for the unused commitments at rates ranging from 0.225% to 0.375% per annum depending upon the Company’s 

consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement.

A letter of credit fee equal to the applicable Eurodollar rate multiplied by the face amount of the letter of credit is charged upon issuance 

and on each anniversary date while the letter of credit is outstanding. The agent’s standard up-front fee and other customary 

administrative charges are also due upon issuance of the letter of credit, along with a renewal fee on each anniversary date while the letter 

of credit is outstanding. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, outstanding letters of credit were $9.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively, 

which are issued as collateral on our workers’ compensation insurance.

60

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   60

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
Borrowings accrue interest under the Credit Agreement at either the Base Rate or Eurodollar rate are subject to the applicable margins as 

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

set forth below:

Leverage Ratio 

 1.00:1.00   
 1.00:1.00   
>1.00:1.00   1.50:100 
>1.50:1.00   2.00:1.00 
>2.00:1.00   

Eurodollar Margin 

Base Rate Margin 

Commitment Fee Rate

1.75% 
1.75% 
2.00% 
2.25% 
2.50% 

0.75% 
0.75% 
1.00% 
1.25% 
1.50% 

0.225% 
0.225% 
0.250% 
0.300% 
0.375% 

Our Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. For example, without prior approval of our bank 

group, we are restricted in incurring additional debt, disposing of assets, making investments, allowing fundamental changes to our 

business or organization and making certain payments in respect of stock or other ownership interests, such as dividends and stock 

repurchases, up to $50.0 million. Under our Credit Agreement, we are also required to meet certain financial covenants with respect  

to minimum fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios.

Our Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including bankruptcy and other insolvency events, cross-defaults to other 

debt agreements, a change in control involving us or any subsidiary guarantor and the failure to comply with certain covenants.

In connection with the Merger, we must obtain the consent of certain of the lenders under our Credit Agreement prior to the closing 

thereof, as the Merger would constitute a default under our credit facility. Almost Family’s credit facility contains similar consent 

requirements and default provisions that would be triggered by the Merger. As a result, we intend to amend or refinance our Credit 

Agreement, potentially seek additional sources of financing, and terminate Almost Family’s credit facility in connection with the closing  

of the Merger. We intend to pay the outstanding borrowings and accrued and unpaid interest under Almost Family’s credit facility and 

certain debt issuance costs and Merger-related fees and expenses from the proceeds of such amendment or refinancing. Although we 

currently believe that we will be able to obtain any necessary amendment or refinancing of our Credit Agreement at a reasonable cost, 

there can be no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining such amendment or refinancing on favorable terms, if at all.

At December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the Credit Agreement governing our credit facility.

Contractual Obligations

The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual obligations and the periods in which payments are due as of 

December 31, 2017 (amounts in thousands):

Contractual Cash Obligation 

Long-term debt 
Operating leases 

Total contractual cash obligations 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Payment Due by Period 

Total 

$ 144,286 
  73,214 

$ 217,500 

Less Than 
1 Year 

286 
$ 
  23,119 

$ 23,405 

1-3 Years 

3-5 Years 

$ 144,000 
  28,528 

$ 172,528 

$  — 
  14,395 

$ 14,395 

More Than
5 Years

$  —
  7,172

$ 7,172

We currently do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities, financial partnerships or entities often referred 

to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet 

arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange 

traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had 

engaged in these relationships.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

61

05759-LHC.indd   61

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is 

incorporated herein by reference.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussions describe our critical accounting policies, which we believe require the most significant judgment and estimates 

used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make 

estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at 

the date of the financial statements and the reported revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Changes in the accounting 

estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from our estimates. To the 

extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations will  

be affected. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances 

and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries and entities controlled by us through our direct ownership of a majority 

interest or controlling member ownership of such entities. Third party equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as 

noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the percentage of net service revenue earned by type of ownership or relationship we had with the operating 

entity for the periods presented for the years ending December 31:

Ownership Type 

Wholly owned subsidiaries 
Equity joint ventures 
Other   

2017 

51.0% 
47.0
2.0

2016 

57.2%
41.2
1.6

100.0% 

  100.0%

2015

55.2%
42.9
1.9

100.0%

All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All business combinations accounted  

for under the acquisition method have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.

We consolidate equity joint venture entities as we have controlling interests, have voting control over these entities, or have the ability  

to exercise significant influence in these entities. The members of our equity joint ventures participate in profits and losses in proportion to 

their equity interest.

We have various management service agreements under which we manage certain operations of agencies. We do not consolidate these 

agencies because we do not have an ownership interest in, nor do we have an obligation to absorb losses of, or right to receive benefits 

from the entities that own the agencies.

We, through wholly owned subsidiaries, lease home health licenses necessary to operate certain of our home nursing and hospice 

agencies. As with wholly owned subsidiaries, we consolidate these entities in which have license leasing arrangements as we own 

100% of the equity of these subsidiaries.

Revenue Recognition

For a detailed discussion of revenue recognition, see Item 1, which is incorporated here by reference.

We report net service revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, managed care 

payors, patients and others for services rendered. All payors contribute to the home health services, hospice services, community-based 

services and facility-based services.

62

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   62

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
The following table sets forth the percentage of net service revenue earned by category of payor for the respective years ending 

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

December 31:

Payor 

Medicare 
Medicaid 
Other   

Medicare

Home Health Services

2017 

71.0% 
1.8
27.2

2016 

74.5%
1.8
23.7

100.0% 

  100.0%

2015

74.5%
1.5
24.0

100.0%

Our home nursing Medicare patients are classified into one of 153 home health resource groups prior to receiving services. Based on 

this home health resource group, we are entitled to receive a standard prospective Medicare payment for delivering care over a 60-day 

period referred to as an episode. We recognize revenue based on the number of days elapsed during an episode of care within the 

reporting period.

Final payments from Medicare may reflect base payment adjustments for case-mix and geographic wage differences and 2% sequestration 

reduction for episodes beginning after March 31, 2013. In addition, final payments may reflect one of four retroactive adjustments  

to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the total reimbursement: (a) an outlier payment if the patient’s care was unusually costly; 

(b) a low utilization adjustment if the number of visits was fewer than five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another 

provider or transferred from another provider before completing the episode; or (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy 

services required. Adjustments outlined above are automatically recognized in net service revenue when changes occur during the period 

in which the services are provided to the patient. Net service revenue and related patient accounts receivable are recorded at amounts 

estimated to be realized from Medicare for services rendered.

Hospice Services

Hospice services provided by us are paid by Medicare under a per diem payment system. We receive one of four predetermined daily 

rates based upon the level of care we furnish. We record net service revenue from hospice services based on the daily rate and recognize 

revenue as hospice services are provided.

Hospice payments are subject to an inpatient cap and an overall Medicare payment cap. The inpatient cap relates to individual programs 

receiving more than 20% of its total Medicare reimbursement from inpatient care services and the overall Medicare payment cap relates  

to individual programs receiving reimbursements in excess of a “cap amount,” calculated by multiplying the number of beneficiaries during 

the period by a statutory amount that is indexed for inflation. The determination for each cap is made annually based on the 12-month 

period ending on October 31 of each year. We monitor its limits on a provider-by-provider basis and records an estimate of its liability for 

reimbursements received in excess of the cap amount. Beginning with cap year ended October 1, 2014, Center for Medicare and 

Medicaid Services (“CMS”) implemented a new process requiring hospice providers to self-report their cap liabilities and remit applicable 

payment by March 31 of the following year.

Facility-Based Services

Long-Term Acute Care Services. We are reimbursed by Medicare for services provided under the long-term acute care hospital 

(“LTACH”) prospective payment system. Each patient is assigned a long-term care diagnosis-related group. We are paid a predetermined 

fixed amount intended to reflect the average cost of treating a Medicare patient classified in that particular long-term care diagnosis-

related group. For selected patients, the amount may be further adjusted based on length-of-stay and facility-specific costs, as well as in 

instances where a patient is discharged and subsequently re-admitted, among other factors. We calculate the adjustment based on a 

historical average of these types of adjustments for claims paid. Similar to other Medicare prospective payment systems, the rate is also 

adjusted for geographic wage differences. Revenue is recognized for our LTACHs as services are provided.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

63

05759-LHC.indd   63

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Medicaid, Managed Care and Other Payors

Our Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each service provided. Therefore, revenue is 

recognized for Medicaid services as services are provided based on this fee schedule. Our managed care and other payors reimburse us 

based upon a predetermined fee schedule or an episodic basis, depending on the terms of the applicable contract. Accordingly, we 

recognize revenue from managed care and other payors in the same manner similar to our Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Uncollectible Accounts

We report accounts receivable net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts and adjustments. Accounts receivable are 

uncollateralized and primarily consist of amounts due from Medicare, other third-party payors and patients. To provide for accounts 

receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, we establish an allowance for uncollectible accounts to reduce the carrying 

amount of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The amount of the provision for uncollectible accounts is based upon 

our assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic conditions and trends in government reimbursement. 

Uncollectible accounts are written off after exhausting collection efforts and we have concluded that the account will not be collected. 

Because Medicare is our primary payor, the credit risk associated with receivables from other payors is limited. We believe the credit risk 

associated with our Medicare accounts, which represent approximately 60% of our patient accounts receivable at December 31, 2017 

and 2016, is limited due to (a) our historical collections experience with Medicare and (b) the fact that Medicare is a U.S. government 

payor. We do not believe that there are any other significant concentrations of receivables from any particular payor that would subject it 

to any significant credit risk in the collection of accounts receivable.

A portion of the estimated Medicare prospective payment system reimbursement from each submitted home nursing episode is received  

in the form of a request for anticipated payment (“RAP”). We submit a RAP for 60% of the estimated reimbursement for the initial episode 

at the start of care. The full amount of the episode is billed after the episode has been completed. The RAP received for that particular 

episode is deducted from the final payment. If a final bill is not submitted within the greater of 120 days from the start of the episode, or 

60 days from the date the RAP was paid, any RAPs received for that episode will be recouped by Medicare from any other Medicare 

claims in process for that particular provider. The RAP and final claim must then be resubmitted. For subsequent episodes of care contiguous 

with the first episode for a particular patient, we submit a RAP for 50% instead of 60% of the estimated reimbursement.

Our Medicare population is paid at a prospectively set amount that can be determined at the time services are rendered. Our Medicaid 

reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each individual service we provide. Our managed care contracts are 

structured similar to the Medicare and Medicaid payment methodologies. Because of our payor mix, we are able to more accurately 

calculate our actual amount due at the patient level and adjust the gross charges to the actual amount at the time of billing. This negates 

the need to record an estimated allowance for uncollectible accounts, similar to a contractual adjustment, when reporting the majority of 

our net service revenue for each reporting period.

At December 31, 2017, our allowance for uncollectible accounts, as a percentage of patient accounts receivable, was approximately 

12.7%, or $23.6 million, compared to 18.9%, or $29.0 million, at December 31, 2016. Accounts Receivable days sales outstanding 

(“DSO”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 51 days compared to 49 days for the same period in 2016. An increase in managed 

care accounts receivable, and collection delays resulting from reviews, audits and investigations from ZPICs, RACs, and additional 

development requests have each contributed to the increase in days sales outstanding.

The percentage of our allowance for uncollectible accounts decreased in 2017. Accounts receivable generated from our 2017 acquisitions 

caused a higher percentage of accounts receivable to be less than 365 days. In addition, improvements in 2017 in our outstanding 

accounts receivable and the resolution of prior year accounts receivables has led to healthier receivables. Accounts receivable over 180 days 

has decreased by 26.2% from 18% of total accounts receivable in 2016 to 14.1% of total accounts receivable in 2017, while our 

accounts receivable over 365 days has decreased by 32.8% from 8.9% of total accounts receivable in 2016 to 6.7% of total accounts 

receivable in 2017.

64

Form 10-K Part I I

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

05759-LHC.indd   64

4/4/18   4:23 PM

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2017, the aging of accounts receivable (based on the end of episode date) (amounts 

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

in thousands):

Payor   

Medicare 
Medicaid 
Other   

  Total  

0-90 

91-180 

181-365 

Over 365 

Total

$  79,286 
3,479 
  58,760 

$ 141,525 

$  9,257 
  2,184 
  6,411 

$ 17,852 

$  5,407 
  2,340 
  5,871 

$ 13,618 

$  5,751 
  1,790 
  4,918 

$ 12,459 

$  99,701
9,793
  75,960

$ 185,454

For home health services, hospice services, and community-based services, we calculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts as  

a percentage of total patient receivables. The percentage changes depending on the payor and increases as the patient receivables age. 

For facility-based services, we calculate the allowance for uncollectible accounts based on a claim by claim review.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, the aging of accounts receivable (based on the end of episode date) (amounts 

in thousands):

Payor   

Medicare 
Medicaid 
Other   

  Total  

0-90 

91-180 

181-365 

Over 365 

Total

$  71,386 
4,600 
  33,084 

$ 109,070 

$  9,590 
  1,470 
  5,943 

$ 17,003 

$  5,547 
  1,380 
  7,179 

$ 14,106 

$  5,720 
268 
  7,672 

$ 13,660 

$  92,243
7,718
  53,878

$ 153,839

The following table summarizes the activity and ending balances in the allowance for uncollectible accounts (amounts in thousands):

Year ended December 31:

2017   
  2016   
2015   

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Beginning of 
Year Balance 

Additions 

Deductions 

End of
Year Balance

$ 29,036
  26,712 
18,582

$  9,484
  14,790 
19,243

$ 14,964
  12,466 
11,113

$ 23,556
  29,036
26,712

We have a significant amount of goodwill on our balance sheet that resulted from the numerous business acquisitions we have made in 

prior years. We review goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives annually for impairment or more frequently if circumstances 

indicate impairment may have occurred. We evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the current fair value of each of our reporting 

units to their carrying value, including goodwill. Our business is comprised of four reporting units: home health, hospice, community-

based, and LTACH. To the extent the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would be 

required to perform the second step of the impairment test. Our impairment analysis is performed on November 30th of each year.

We performed a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units are less than  

their carrying values. We evaluated relevant events and circumstances, such as market conditions, financial performance, and share price 

to determine if any goodwill impairment is indicated. Based on our analysis, an impairment of goodwill was not indicated.

We have not recognized any goodwill impairment charges in 2017, 2016 or 2015 related to the annual impairment testing.

Components of our reporting units are represented by individual subsidiaries or joint ventures with individual licenses to conduct 

operations within geographic markets as limited by the terms of each license. We consider each component as individual businesses, as 

discrete financial information is available and management regularly reviews the operating results of those businesses. During the year 

ended December 31, 2017, we recognized a disposal of $1.5 million related to goodwill associated with the closure of underperforming 

locations. The impairment was calculated using a market approach.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Form 10-K Part I I

65

05759-LHC.indd   65

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Included in intangible assets are definite-lived assets subject to amortization such as software licenses, non-compete agreements and 

defensive assets, which are defined as trade names that are not actively used. Amortization of the definite-lived intangible assets is 

calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Non-compete agreements are amortized over the 

life of the agreement, usually ranging from one to three years.

We also have indefinite-lived assets that are not subject to amortization expense such as actively used trade names, certificates of need 

and licenses to conduct specific operations within geographic markets. Such trade names, certificates of need and licenses have 

indefinite lives because there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors that would limit the useful lives of these 

intangible assets and we intend to renew and operate the certificates of need and licenses and use these trade names indefinitely. These 

indefinite-lived intangibles are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have 

occurred. To determine whether an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, we perform a qualitative assessment. Based on the results 

of the qualitative assessment, we may perform a quantitative test. The quantitative impairment test on trade names uses the relief-from-

royalty method. Under this method, the fair value of the trade name is determined by calculating the present value of the after-tax cost 

savings associated with owning the trade names and, therefore, not having to pay royalties for use over its estimated useful life. The 

quantitative impairment test for certificates of need and licenses applies the cost approach. Under this method, assumptions are made 

about the cost to replace the certificates of need and licenses. Based on our analysis, there were no indicators that any intangible assets 

were impaired and no impairment charge was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. We did record impairment 

charges of $0.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our exposure to market risk relates to fluctuations in interest rates from borrowings under the credit facility. Our letter of credit fees and 

interest accrued on our debt borrowings are subject to the applicable Eurodollar rate or Base Rate. A hypothetical 100 basis point 

increase in interest rates on the average daily amounts outstanding under the credit facility would have increased interest expense by 

$1.0 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are 

incorporated by reference into this Item 8.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

66

Form 10-K Part I I

05759-LHC.indd   66

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Item 9A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by  

the Company in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the  

time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s 

management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding  

required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s 

management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on that 

evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and 

procedures (as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated of the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2017.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term  

is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer 

and Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s management conducted an evaluation of its internal control over financial reporting based  

on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway 

Commission. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 

projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of 

changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based on management’s testing and evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), management 

concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Under guidelines established by the SEC, companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over 

financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company. Accordingly, our assessment of the 

internal controls excluded our acquisitions from LifePoint Health, Inc., which were acquired during 2017, our acquisitions from Baptist 

Memorial Health Care, which were acquired on June 1, 2017, and our acquisitions from CHRISTUS Continuing Care, which were 

acquired on September 1, 2017. Operations from these acquisitions represented approximately 20% of total assets and 8% of total 

revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The attestation report of KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in 

this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of 

the Exchange Act, during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to 

materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

05759-LHC.indd   67

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I I

67

LHC GROUP

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

LHC Group, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited LHC Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based 

on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 

Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as 

of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of 

Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 

consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in 

equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated 

financial statements), and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company formed joint ventures with LifePoint Health, Inc. during 2017, Baptist Memorial Health Care on June 1, 2017, and CHRISTUS 

Continuing Care on September 1, 2017, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal 

control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, LifePoint Health, Inc., Baptist Memorial Health Care, and CHRISTUS Continuing 

Care’s internal control over financial reporting associated with approximately 20 percent of total assets and 8 percent of total revenue 

included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Our audit of internal 

control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of LifePoint Health, 

Inc., Baptist Memorial Health Care, and CHRISTUS Continuing Care.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the 

effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over 

Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. 

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance 

with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to 

obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our 

audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the 

risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the 

assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that 

our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 

reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A 

company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, 

in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable 

assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted 

accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of 

management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized 

acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any 

evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, 

or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 

March 1, 2018

68

Form 10-K Part I I

05759-LHC.indd   68

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Item 9B. Other Information.

None noted.

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

05759-LHC.indd   69

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I I

69

LHC GROUP

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this Item regarding our directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference from the information 

contained under the heading “Information About Directors, Nominees and Management” in the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 

Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The information required by this Item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference from  

he information contained under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the definitive Proxy Statement 

relating to the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The information required by this Item regarding our corporate governance Nominating Committee and Audit Committee is incorporated  

by reference from the information contained under the heading “The Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” in the definitive Proxy 

Statement relating to the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. This code is publicly available in the investor 

relations area of our website at www.lhcgroup.com. Any substantive amendments to this code, or any waivers granted for any directors or 

executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, will be 

disclosed on our website and remain available there for at least 12 months. This code of ethics is not incorporated in this report by reference. 

Copies of our code of ethics will also be provided, without charge, upon written request to Investor Relations at LHC Group, Inc.,  

901 Hugh Wallis Road South, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this Item regarding our executive compensation and Compensation Committee is incorporated by reference 

from the information contained under the heading “Executive Officer Compensation” in the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 

Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management  
and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this Item regarding our securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and security 

ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the information contained under the headings 

“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2018 

Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017, regarding shares of common stock that may be issued under the 

Company’s existing equity compensation plans:

Plan Category 

(a) 

(b) 

Number of Shares 
to be Issued 
Upon Exercise of 
Outstanding Options,  
Warrants, and Rights 

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price of 
 Outstanding Price of 
Outstanding Rights 

(c)
Number of Shares
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column a) (1)

Equity compensation plans approved by Stockholders:   
Equity compensation plans not approved by Stockholders: 

Total    

  — 
  — 

  — 

$  — 
  — 

$  — 

559,082
—

559,082

(1)  Includes 391,737 shares remaining available for issuance under the LHC Group, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (all of which are available for issuance pursuant to grants of 

full-value stock awards) and 167,345 shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated LHC Group, Inc.’s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

70

Form 10-K Part I I I

05759-LHC.indd   70

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this Item regarding transactions with related persons is incorporated by reference from the information 

contained under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 

2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item regarding accounting and audit fees is incorporated by reference from the information contained 

under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2018 Annual 

Meeting of Stockholders.

05759-LHC.indd   71

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Form 10-K Part I I I

71

LHC GROUP

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Documents to be filed with Form 10-K:

(1)  Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017

  Consolidated Statements of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

  Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

F-1

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

There are no financial statement schedules included in this report.

(3) Exhibits

The Exhibits are listed in the Index of Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K included herewith, which is incorporated  

by reference.

72

Form 10-K Part I V

05759-LHC.indd  72

4/4/18  4:23 PM

 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Stockholders and Board of Directors

LHC Group, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LHC Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 

2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 

period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the 

consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 

and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,  

in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), 

the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – 

Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated 

March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion 

on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are 

required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and 

regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to 

obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error  

or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, 

whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test 

basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the 

accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the 

consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 

March 1, 2018

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Form 10-K Part I V

F-1

05759-LHC.indd   1

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LHC GROUP

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

As of December 31, 

ASSETS
Current assets:

Cash 

  Receivables:

  Patient accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts  

  of $23,556 and $29,036, respectively 

  Other receivables 
  Amounts due from governmental entities 

  Total receivables, net 

  Prepaid income taxes 
  Prepaid expenses 
  Other current assets 

  Total current assets 

Property, building and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $43,565 and $35,226, respectively 
Goodwill  
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $13,041 and $10,968, respectively 
Other assets 

  Total assets 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
  Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities 
  Salaries, wages and benefits payable 
  Self insurance reserves 
  Current portion of long-term debt 
  Amounts due to governmental entities 

Income tax payable 

  Total current liabilities 

  Deferred income taxes 
  Revolving credit facility 
  Long-term debt, less current portion 

  Total liabilities 

Noncontrolling interest-redeemable 
Stockholders’ equity:
  LHC Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity:

  Preferred stock – $0.01 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized;  

  none issued or outstanding 

  Common stock – $0.01 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; 22,640,046 and  

  22,429,041 shares issued in 2017 and 2016, respectively 

  Treasury stock – 4,890,504 and 4,828,679 shares at cost, respectively   
  Additional paid-in capital 
  Retained earnings 

  Total LHC Group, Inc. stockholders’ equity 

  Noncontrolling interest – non-redeemable 

  Total stockholders’ equity 

  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

2017 

2016

$  2,849

$  3,264

  161,898 
3,163 
830 

  165,891 
7,006 
  13,042 
  12,177 

  200,965 
  46,453 
  392,601 
  134,610 
  19,073 

$ 793,702 

$  39,750 
  44,747 
  12,450 
286 
5,019 
— 

  102,252 
  27,466 
  144,000 
— 

  273,718 
  13,393 

  124,803
5,115
942

  130,860
—
9,821
5,796

  149,741
  43,251
  307,317
  102,006
  11,756

$ 614,071

$  26,805
  34,265
  10,691
252
4,955
3,499

  80,467
  31,941
  87,000
544

  199,952
  12,567

— 

—

226 
(42,249) 
  126,490 
  364,401 

  448,868 
  57,723 

  506,591 

$ 793,702 

224
(39,135)
  119,748
  314,289

  395,126
6,426

  401,552

$ 614,071

F-2

Form 10-K Part I V

Consolidated Balance Sheets

05759-LHC.indd   2

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

For the Year Ended December 31, 

Net service revenue 
Cost of service revenue 

Gross margin 
Provision for bad debts 
General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 
Loss on disposal of assets 

Operating income 
Interest expense 
Non-operating income 

Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interests  
Income tax expense 

Net income 

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests  

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 

Earnings per share – basic:

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 

Earnings per share – diluted:

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic   
Diluted 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

2017 

2016 

2015

$  1,072,086 
675,810

$  914,823
557,650

$  816,366
480,878

396,276
9,484
310,539
1,511
60

74,682
(3,876) 
524

71,330
10,944

60,386
10,274
50,112

2.83

2.79

$ 

$ 

$ 

357,173
14,790
270,622
—
1,199

70,562
(2,936) 
492

68,118
22,176

45,942
9,359
36,583

2.08

2.07

$ 

$ 

$ 

335,488
19,243
247,919
1,273
710

66,343
(2,302)
457

64,498
22,848

41,650
9,315
32,335

1.86

1.84

$ 

$ 

$ 

17,715,992 
17,961,018

  17,559,477 
17,682,820 

  17,405,379
  17,547,531

Consolidated Statements of Income

Form 10-K Part I I

F-3

05759-LHC.indd   3

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

LHC Group, Inc. 

Common Stock 

Issued 

Treasury 

  Amount 

Shares 

Amount 

Shares 

Additional 
Paid-In 
Capital 

Noncontrolling 
Interest –  

Total 
Retained 
Earnings  Non-Redeemable  Equity 

Noncontrolling 
Interest –  
Redeemable 

Net
Income

Balances at December 31, 2014 
Net income 
Acquired noncontrolling interest 
Noncontrolling interest distributions 
Purchase of additional controlling  

interest 

Stock options exercised 
Nonvested stock compensation 
Issuance of vested stock 
Treasury shares redeemed to pay 

income tax 

Excess tax benefits-vesting 
  nonvested stock 
Issuance of common stock under  
  Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
Balances at December 31, 2015 

Net income 
Acquired noncontrolling interest 
Sale of noncontrolling interest 
Noncontrolling interest distributions 
Stock options exercised 
Nonvested stock compensation 
Issuance of vested stock 
Treasury shares redeemed to pay  

income tax 

Excess tax benefits-vesting  
  nonvested stock 
Issuance of common stock under  
  Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
Balances at December 31, 2016 

Net Income 
Acquired noncontrolling interest 
Purchase of additional controlling  

interest 

Sale of noncontrolling interest 
Noncontrolling interest distributions 
Nonvested stock compensation 
Issuance of vested stock 
Treasury shares redeemed to pay  

income tax 

Issuance of common stock under  
  Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
Balances at December 31, 2017 

$ 220 
  — 
  — 
  — 

  22,015,211 
— 
— 
— 

 (35,660) 
  — 
  — 
  — 

 4,734,363  $ 108,708 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
— 

$ 245,371 
  32,335 
— 
— 

$  2,956 
  1,737 
155 
  (1,637) 

$ 321,595 
  34,072 
155 
(1,637) 

$ 11,517
  7,578 
  —
 (6,687)

 41,650

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 

  — 

  — 

— 
9,500 
— 
176,989 

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 

— 
— 
— 
— 

(275) 
144 
  4,225 
— 

— 

  (1,479) 

42,197 

— 

— 

  — 

— 

211 

— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

— 

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 

(275) 
144 
  4,225 
— 

  —
  —
  —
  —

  — 

(1,479) 

  —

  — 

211 

  —

2 
$ 222 

22,723 

  — 
  22,224,423  $ (37,139) 

— 

780 
 4,776,560  $ 113,793 

— 
$ 277,706 

  — 
$  3,211 

782 
$ 357,793 

  —
$ 12,408

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
2 

  — 

  — 

— 
— 
— 
— 
5,500 
— 
174,969 

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 
— 
(931) 
— 
109 
  4,872 
(2) 

  36,583 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

  1,373 
  1,783 
  1,400 
  (1,341) 
  — 
  — 
  — 

  37,956 
  1,783 
469
(1,341) 
109 
  4,872 
— 

  7,986 
  —

 (7,827)
  —
  —
  —

 45,942

— 

  (1,996) 

52,119 

— 

— 

  — 

— 

995 

— 

— 

  — 

(1,996) 

  —

  — 

995 

  —

  — 
$ 224 

24,149 

  — 
  22,429,041  $ (39,135) 

— 

912 
 4,828,679  $ 119,748 

— 
$ 314,289 

  — 
$  6,426 

912 
$ 401,552 

  —
$ 12,567

  — 
  — 

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
2 

  — 

— 
— 

  — 
  — 

— 
— 
— 
— 
192,463 

  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 
  — 

— 
— 

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

  (3,114) 

61,825 

— 
— 

  50,112 
— 

(595) 
 53,657 

  49,517 
  53,657 

 10,869 
  —

 60,386

(368) 
122 
— 
  5,964 
(2) 

 (1,120)
412
 (9,335)

— 
— 
— 
— 
— 

— 

  — 
282 
  (2,047) 
  — 
  — 

(368) 
404 
(2,047) 

  5,964
—

  — 

(3,114)

  — 
$ 226 

18,542 

  — 
  22,640,046  $ (42,249) 

— 

  1,026 
 4,890,504  $ 126,490 

— 
$ 364,401 

  — 
$ 57,723 

  1,026
$ 506,591 

$ 13,393

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

Form 10-K Part IV

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

05759-LHC.indd   4

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 

2017 

2016 

2015

Operating activities
Net income 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
  Depreciation and amortization expense 
  Provision for bad debts 
  Stock-based compensation expense 
  Deferred income taxes 
  Loss on disposal of assets 

Impairment of intangibles and other 

  Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

  Receivables 
  Prepaid expenses and other assets 
  Prepaid income taxes 
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses 

Income tax payable 

  Net amounts due to/from governmental entities 

Net cash provided by operating activities 

Investing activities
Cash paid for acquisitions, primarily goodwill and intangible assets 
Purchases of property, building and equipment 
Advanced payments on acquisitions 
Other   
Net cash (used in) investing activities 

Financing activities
Proceeds from line of credit 
Payments on line of credit 
Excess tax benefits from vesting of stock awards 
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan 
Payments on debt 
Noncontrolling interest distributions 
Purchase of additional controlling interest 
Sale of noncontrolling interest 
Withholding taxes paid on stock-based compensation 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities 
Change in cash 
Cash at beginning of period 
Cash at end of period 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Interest paid 

Income taxes paid 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

$ 60,386 

$ 45,942 

$ 41,650

  13,422 
9,484 
5,964 
(4,475) 
60 
1,511 

  (36,390) 
  (26,973) 
(7,006) 
  19,666 
(3,499) 
176 
  32,326 

  (64,598) 
  (10,176) 
— 
— 
  (74,774) 

  96,000 
  (39,000) 
— 
1,026 
(260) 
  (11,382) 
(1,488) 
251 
(3,114) 
— 
  42,033 
(415) 
3,264 
$  2,849 

  12,160 
  14,790 
  4,872 
  7,402 
  1,199 
— 

  (28,873) 
  1,034 
  1,641 
  9,182 
84 
(1,961) 
  67,472 

  (23,156) 
  (16,009) 
  (11,488) 
273 
  (50,380) 

  38,000 
  (49,000) 
  1,303 
912 
(238) 
(9,413) 
— 
356 
(1,996) 
109 
  (19,967) 
(2,875) 
  6,139 
$  3,264 

  11,955
  19,243
4,225
1,518
710
1,280

  (27,951)
(3,793)
441
  10,526
—
130
  59,934

  (70,572)
  (13,283)
—
—
  (83,855)

  83,000
  (45,000)
914
782
(233)
(8,324)
(275)
—
(1,479)
144
  29,529
5,608
531
$  6,139

$  3,853 

$ 25,199 

$  3,123 

$ 11,533 

$  1,870

$ 20,361

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Form 10-K Part IV

F-5

05759-LHC.indd   5

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

LHC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization

LHC Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is a health care provider specializing in the post-acute continuum of care. The Company provides home 

health services, hospice services, community-based services, and facility-based services, the latter primarily through long-term acute care 

hospitals (“LTACHs”). As of December 31, 2017, the Company, through its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries, equity joint ventures, 

controlled affiliates, and management agreements, operated 442 service providers in 27 states within the continental United States.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) requires 

management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the Company’s accompanying consolidated 

financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The most significant estimates relate to revenue recognition, collectability of accounts receivable and impairment of goodwill and other 

indefinite-lived intangible assets. A description of the significant accounting policies and a discussion of the significant estimates and 

judgments associated with such policies are described below.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries and entities controlled by the Company through direct ownership of majority 

interest or controlling member ownership of such entities. Third party equity interests in the consolidated joint ventures are reflected as 

noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the percentage of net service revenue earned by type of ownership or relationship the Company had with 

the operating entity for the periods presented for the years ending December 31:

Ownership Type 

Wholly owned subsidiaries 
Equity joint ventures 
Other    

2017 

51.0% 
47.0
2.0

2016 

57.2%
41.2
1.6

100.0% 

  100.0%

2015

55.2%
42.9
1.9

100.0%

All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All business combinations accounted for 

under the acquisition method have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.

The Company consolidates equity joint venture entities as the Company has controlling interests, has voting control over these entities,  

or has ability to exercise significant influence in these entities. The members of the Company’s equity joint ventures participate in profits 

and losses in proportion to their equity interests.

The Company has various management services agreements under which the Company manages certain operations of agencies.  

The Company does not consolidate these agencies because the Company does not have an ownership interest in, nor does it have an 

obligation to absorb losses of, or right to receive benefits from the entities that own the agencies.

The Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries, leases home health licenses necessary to operate certain of its home nursing and 

hospice agencies. As with wholly owned subsidiaries, the Company owns 100% of the equity of these entities and consolidates them 

based on such ownership.

F-6

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   6

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Revenue Recognition

The Company reports net service revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from Medicare, Medicaid, and others for services 

rendered. The Company assesses the patient’s ability to pay for their healthcare services at the time of patient admission based on  

the Company’s verification of the patient’s insurance coverage under the Medicare, Medicaid, and other commercial or managed care 

insurance programs. Medicare contributes to the net service revenue of the Company’s home health services, hospice services, and 

facility-based services. Medicaid and other payors contribute to the net service revenue of all of the Company’s services.

The following table sets forth the percentage of net service revenue earned by category of payor for the years ending December 31:

Payor 

Medicare 
Medicaid 
Managed Care, Commercial and Other 

Medicare

Home Health Services

2017 

71.0% 
1.8
27.2

2016 

74.5%
1.8
23.7

100.0% 

  100.0%

2015

74.5%
1.5
24.0

100.0%

The Company’s home nursing Medicare patients are classified into one of 153 home health resource groups prior to receiving services. 

Based on this home health resource group, the Company is entitled to receive a standard prospective Medicare payment for delivering 

care over a 60-day period referred to as an episode. The Company recognizes revenue based on the number of days elapsed during an 

episode of care within the reporting period.

Final payments from Medicare may reflect base payment adjustments for case-mix and geographic wage differences and 2% sequestration 

reduction for episodes beginning after March 31, 2013. In addition, final payments may reflect one of four retroactive adjustments  

to ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of the total reimbursement: (a) an outlier payment if the patient’s care was unusually costly; 

(b) a low utilization adjustment if the number of visits was fewer than five; (c) a partial payment if the patient transferred to another 

provider or transferred from another provider before completing the episode; or (d) a payment adjustment based upon the level of therapy 

services required. Adjustments outlined above are automatically recognized in net service revenue when changes occur during the 

period in which the services are provided to the patient. Net service revenue and related patient accounts receivable are recorded at 

amounts estimated to be realized from Medicare for services rendered.

Hospice Services

Hospice services provided by the Company are paid by Medicare under a per diem payment system. The Company receives one of four 

predetermined daily rates based upon the level of care the Company furnishes. The Company records net service revenue from hospice 

services based on the daily rate and recognizes revenue as hospice services are provided.

Hospice payments are subject to an inpatient cap and an overall Medicare payment cap. The inpatient cap relates to individual programs 

receiving more than 20% of its total Medicare reimbursement from inpatient care services and the overall Medicare payment cap relates to 

individual programs receiving reimbursements in excess of a “cap amount,” calculated by multiplying the number of beneficiaries during 

the period by a statutory amount that is indexed for inflation. The determination for each cap is made annually based on the 12-month 

period ending on October 31 of each year. The Company monitors its limits on a provider-by-provider basis and records an estimate of its 

liability for reimbursements received in excess of the cap amount. Beginning with cap year ended October 1, 2014, Center for Medicare 

and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) implemented a new process requiring hospice providers to self-report their cap liabilities and remit 

applicable payment by March 31 of the following year.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-7

05759-LHC.indd   7

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Facility-Based Services

Long-Term Acute Care Services. The Company is reimbursed by Medicare for services provided under the long-term acute care 

hospital (“LTACH”) prospective payment system. Each patient is assigned a long-term care diagnosis-related group. The Company is paid 

a predetermined fixed amount intended to reflect the average cost of treating a Medicare patient classified in that particular long-term  

care diagnosis-related group. For selected patients, the amount may be further adjusted based on length-of-stay and facility-specific 

costs, as well as in instances where a patient is discharged and subsequently re-admitted, among other factors. The Company calculates 

the adjustment based on a historical average of these types of adjustments for claims paid. Similar to other Medicare prospective 

payment systems, the rate is also adjusted for geographic wage differences. Revenue is recognized for the Company’s LTACHs as 

services are provided.

Medicaid, Managed Care and Other Payors

The Company’s Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each service provided. Therefore, revenue  

is recognized for Medicaid services as services are provided based on this fee schedule. The Company’s managed care and other payors 

reimburse the Company based upon a predetermined fee schedule or on an episodic basis, depending on the terms of the applicable 

contract. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue from managed care and other payors in the same manner as the Company 

recognizes revenue from Medicare or Medicaid.

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Uncollectible Accounts

The Company reports accounts receivable net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts and adjustments. Accounts receivable 

are uncollateralized and primarily consist of amounts due from Medicare, Medicaid, other third-party payors, and patients. To provide  

for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Company establishes an allowance for uncollectible accounts to 

reduce the carrying amount of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The credit risk associated with receivables from 

other payors is limited due to the significance of Medicare as the primary payor. The Company believes the credit risk associated with its 

Medicare accounts, which have historically exceeded 55.0% of its patient accounts receivable, is limited due to (i) the historical collection 

rate from Medicare and (ii) the fact that Medicare is a U.S. government payor. The Company does not believe that there are any other 

significant concentrations of receivables from any particular payor that would subject it to any significant credit risk in the collection of 

accounts receivable.

The amount of the provision for bad debts is based upon the Company’s assessment of historical and expected net collections, business 

and economic conditions, and trends in government reimbursement. Uncollectible accounts are written off when the Company has 

determined that the account will not be collected.

A portion of the estimated Medicare prospective payment system reimbursement from each submitted home nursing episode is received 

in the form of a request for anticipated payment (“RAP”). The Company submits a RAP for 60% of the estimated reimbursement for  

the initial episode at the start of care. The full amount of the episode is billed after the episode has been completed. The RAP received  

for that particular episode is deducted from the final payment. If a final bill is not submitted within the greater of 120 days from the  

start of the episode, or 60 days from the date the RAP was paid, any RAP received for that episode will be recouped by Medicare from 

any other Medicare claims in process for that particular provider. The RAP and final claim must then be resubmitted. For subsequent 

episodes of care contiguous with the first episode for a particular patient, the Company submits a RAP for 50% instead of 60% of the 

estimated reimbursement.

The Company’s services to the Medicare population are paid at prospectively set amounts that can be determined at the time services are 

rendered. The Company’s Medicaid reimbursement is based on a predetermined fee schedule applied to each individual service it 

provides. The Company’s managed care contracts and contracts with other payors provide for payments based upon a predetermined 

fee schedule or an episodic basis, depending on the terms of the applicable contract. The Company is able to calculate its actual 

amount due at the patient level and adjust the gross charges down to the actual amount at the time of billing. This negates the need to 

record an estimated contractual allowance when reporting net service revenue for each reporting period.

F-8

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   8

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Business Combination

The Company accounts for its acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”) using the acquisition 

method of accounting. Assets typically acquired consist primarily of Medicare licenses, trade names, certificates of need, and/or 

non-compete agreements. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if any, are measured at fair value on the acquisition date using the 

appropriate valuation method. The noncontrolling interest associated with joint venture acquisitions is also measured and recorded at  

fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to 

assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The operations of the acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial statements from  

their respective dates of acquisition. Acquisition transactions that occurred in 2017 are further described in Note 3 and goodwill and 

intangible assets are discussed in Note 4.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are 

reviewed by the Company at least annually for impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment review of goodwill at 

November 30, and when a triggering event occurs between annual impairment tests. For 2017, the Company performed a qualitative 

assessment of goodwill and determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair values of its reporting units are less than  

the carrying amounts. The Company has not recognized any goodwill impairment charges in 2017, 2016 or 2015 related to the annual 

impairment testing.

Components of the Company’s reporting units are represented by individual subsidiaries or joint ventures with individual licenses to 

conduct operations within geographic markets as limited by the terms of each license. The Company considers each component as 

individual businesses, as discrete financial information is available and management regularly reviews the operating results of those 

businesses. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a disposal of $1.5 million related to goodwill associated 

with the closure of underperforming locations. The impairment was calculated using a market approach.

Included in intangible assets are definite-lived assets subject to amortization such as non-compete agreements and defensive assets, 

which are defined as trade names that are not actively used. Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets is calculated on a straight-line 

basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from two to ten years. The Company also has indefinite-lived assets 

that are not subject to amortization expense such as trade names, certificates of need, and Medicare licenses to conduct specific 

operations within geographic markets. The Company has concluded that trade names, certificates of need, and licenses have indefinite 

lives, because there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors that would limit the useful lives of these intangible 

assets and the Company intends to renew and operate the certificates of need and licenses and use the trade names indefinitely. These 

indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have 

occurred. To determine whether an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, the Company performs a qualitative assessment to support 

the conclusion that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is not impaired. Based on the results of that qualitative assessment, the Company 

may perform a quantitative test. The Company utilizes a relief-from-royalty method in its quantitative impairment test of trade names. 

Under this method, the fair value of the trade name is determined by calculating the present value of the after-tax cost savings associated 

with owning the trade names and, therefore, not having to pay royalties for use over its estimated useful life. The Company utilizes the 

replacement cost approach in its quantitative impairment test for certificates of need and licenses. Under this method, assumptions are 

made about the cost to replace the certificates of need and licenses. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,  

the Company did not record an impairment charge related to indefinite-lived intangible assets. During the twelve months ended 

December 31, 2015, the Company recorded impairment charges related to indefinite-lived intangible assets of $0.6 million.

Due to/from Governmental Entities

The Company’s LTACHs are reimbursed for certain activities based on tentative rates. The amounts recorded in due to/from governmental 

entities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets relate to settled and open cost reports that are subject to the completion of 

audits and the issuance of final assessments. Final reimbursement is determined based on submission of annual cost reports and audits 

by the fiscal intermediary. Adjustments are accrued on an estimated basis in the period the related services were rendered and further 

adjusted as final settlements are determined. These adjustments are accounted for as changes in estimates. Additionally, reimbursements 

received in excess of hospice cap amounts are recorded in this account.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-9

05759-LHC.indd   9

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LHC GROUP

Property, Building and Equipment

Property, building and equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment acquired in connection with business combinations are 

recorded at estimated fair value in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805. Expenditures that 

increase capacities or extend useful lives are capitalized to the appropriate property, building and equipment accounts. Costs and 

related accumulated depreciation associated with assets that are sold or retired are written off and any gain or losses are recorded in 

operating income. Routine repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets. The estimated useful life  

of buildings is 39 years, while the estimated useful lives of transportation equipment and furniture and other equipment range from 3 to  

10 years. The useful life for leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or the expected life of the leasehold improvement.

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment”, the Company evaluates its long-lived assets for possible impairment 

whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. There 

were no impairment charges recognized during the periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The following table describes the Company’s components of property, building and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2017 

and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

Land    
Building and improvements 
Transportation equipment 
Fixed equipment 
Office furniture and medical equipment 

Less accumulated depreciation 

2017 

2016

$  2,033 
  14,166 
  11,363 
780 
  61,676 

  90,018 
  43,565 

$ 46,453 

$  2,033
  11,363
  11,220
  1,090
  52,771

  78,477
  35,226

$ 43,251

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $13.4 million, $12.2 million and $12.0 million, 

respectively, which was recorded in general and administrative expenses. Amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible 

assets is included in depreciation expense.

Noncontrolling Interest

The Company classifies noncontrolling interests of its joint venture parties based upon a review of the legal provisions governing the 

redemption of such interests. In each of the Company’s joint ventures, those provisions are embodied within the joint venture’s operating 

agreement. For joint ventures with operating agreement provisions that establish an obligation for the Company to purchase the third 

party partners’ noncontrolling interests other than as a result of events that lead to a liquidation of the joint venture, such noncontrolling 

interests are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests in temporary equity. For joint ventures with operating agreement provisions 

that establish an obligation that the Company purchase the third party partners’ noncontrolling interests, but which obligation is triggered 

by events that lead to a liquidation of the joint venture, such noncontrolling interests are classified as nonredeemable noncontrolling 

interests in permanent equity. Additionally, for joint ventures with operating agreement provisions that do not establish an obligation for the 

Company to purchase the third party partners’ noncontrolling interests (e.g., where the Company has the option, but not the obligation,  

to purchase the third party partners’ noncontrolling interests), such noncontrolling interests are classified as nonredeemable noncontrolling 

interests in permanent equity.

The Company’s equity joint ventures that are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests are subject to operating agreement 

provisions that require the Company to purchase the noncontrolling partner’s interest upon the occurrence of certain triggering events, 

which are defined as the bankruptcy of the partner or the partner’s exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs. These triggering 

events and the related repurchase provisions are specific to each redeemable equity joint venture, since the triggering of a repurchase 

obligation for any one redeemable noncontrolling interest in an equity joint venture does not necessarily impact any of the other redeemable 

noncontrolling interests in other equity joint ventures. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event requiring the purchase of a redeemable 

noncontrolling interest, the Company would be required to purchase the noncontrolling partner’s interest based upon a valuation 

methodology set forth in the applicable joint venture agreement.

F-10

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   10

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Redeemable noncontrolling interests and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests are initially recorded at their fair value as of the closing 

date of the transaction establishing the joint venture. Such fair values are determined using various accepted valuation methods, including 

the income approach, the market approach, the cost approach, and a combination of one or more of these approaches. A number of 

facts and circumstances concerning the operation of the joint venture are evaluated for each transaction, including (but not limited to) the 

ability to choose management, control over acquiring or liquidating assets, and control over the joint venture’s strategy and direction, in 

order to determine the fair value of the noncontrolling interest.

Subsequent to the closing date of the transaction establishing the joint venture, recorded values for both redeemable and nonredeemable 

noncontrolling interests are adjusted at the end of each reporting period for (a) comprehensive income (loss) that is attributed to the 

noncontrolling interest, which is calculated by multiplying the noncontrolling interest percentage by the comprehensive income (loss) of the 

joint venture’s operations during the reporting period, (b) dividends paid to the noncontrolling interest partner during the reporting period, 

and (c) any other transactions that increase or decrease the Company’s ownership interest in the joint venture, as a result of which the 

Company retains its controlling interest. If the Company determines based upon its analysis as of the end of each reporting period in 

accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, that it is not probable that an event would occur to otherwise require the redemption 

of a redeemable noncontrolling interest (i.e., the date for such event is not set or such event is not certain to occur), then the Company 

does not adjust the recorded amount of such redeemable noncontrolling interest.

The carrying amount of each redeemable equity instrument presented in temporary equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 

is not less than the initial amount reported for each instrument. The activity of noncontrolling interest-redeemable for the twelve months ended 

December 31, 2017 is summarized in the Company’s Statements of Changes in Equity.

Based upon the Company’s evaluation of the redemption provisions concerning redeemable noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 

2017, the Company determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance that it was not probable that an event otherwise 

requiring redemption of any redeemable noncontrolling interest would occur (i.e., the date for such event was not set or such event is not 

certain to occur). Therefore, none of the redeemable noncontrolling interests were identified as mandatorily redeemable interests at such 

times, and the Company did not record any values in respect of any mandatorily redeemable interests.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based awards in accordance with provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” 

(“ASC 718”). The Company grants restricted stock or restricted stock units to employees and members of its Board of Directors as a form 

of compensation. In accordance with ASC 718, the expense for such awards is based on the grant date fair value of the award and is 

recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. See Note 7 to these consolidated financial statements.

Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth shares used in the computation of basic and diluted per share information for the years ended December 31, 

2017, 2016 and 2015:

Weighted average number of shares outstanding for basic per share calculation 
Effect of dilutive potential shares:
  Options 

Nonvested restricted stock 

2017 

2016 

2015

 17,715,992

17,559,477

17,405,379

— 
245,026

863 
122,480

3,663
138,489

Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted per share calculation 

17,961,018 

 17,682,820

17,547,531

  Antidilutive shares 

— 

219,855 

200,525

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-11

05759-LHC.indd   11

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, as part of its Simplification Initiative, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASU 

2016-09”), which seeks to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several 

aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including (1) accounting for income taxes, (2) classification of excess tax 

benefits on the statement of cash flow, (3) forfeitures, (4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, (5) classification of employee 

taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax withholding purposes, (6) the practical expedient for 

estimating the expected term, and (7) intrinsic value. The Company adopted the new standard on its effective date of January 1, 2017 

and elected to apply this adoption prospectively.

All excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the current and future periods will be recognized as income tax expense in the Company’s 

consolidated financial statements in the reporting period in which they occur. The Company recorded excess tax benefits of $1.0 million 

in income tax expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. Additionally, the Company elected to continue to apply an 

estimated rate of forfeiture to its compensation expense for share-based awards.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (“ASU 2014-09”) which requires an 

entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. 

ASU 2014-09 will replace the majority of existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new 

standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard permits the use of either the full retrospective 

or cumulative effect transition method. As the Company progresses with evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its 

consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, the Company has determined that it will not create a material impact to its 

consolidated financial statements upon implementation on January 1, 2018. Currently, the Company anticipates adopting the new 

standard using the full retrospective method for all periods presented. Upon adoption, in applying the retrospective method, the Company 

expects to present the amounts that are currently included in the provision for bad debts as a reduction to net service revenue related  

to an implicit price concession.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, (“ASU 2016-02”) which requires lessees to recognize qualifying leases  

on the statement of financial position. Qualifying leases will be classified as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. The new standard is 

effective on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition method for all 

entities. The Company anticipates that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in a material increase in total assets and total liabilities. 

The Company continues to evaluate the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its related disclosures.

3. Acquisitions and Joint Ventures

2017 Acquisitions

On January 1, 2017, the Company formed a joint venture with LifePoint Health, Inc. (“LifePoint”). LifePoint contributed 28 home health 

agencies, 12 hospice agencies, and one inpatient hospice unit to the joint venture during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. 

The Company acquired majority ownership of the membership interests of these agencies. These providers conduct home health 

operations in Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia; and conduct hospice 

operations in Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia, and conduct inpatient hospice operations in North Carolina.

On June 1, 2017, the Company formed a joint venture with Baptist Memorial Health Care (“Baptist”). Baptist contributed three home 

health agencies and six hospice agencies, and one inpatient hospice unit to the joint venture during the twelve months ended December 31, 

2017. The Company acquired majority ownership of the membership interests of these agencies. These providers conduct home  

health and hospice operations in Mississippi and Tennessee, and conduct inpatient hospice operations in Tennessee.

On September 1, 2017, the Company formed a joint venture with CHRISTUS Continuing Care (“CHRISTUS”). CHRISTUS contributed seven 

home health agencies, five hospice agencies, one inpatient hospice unit, one community-based agency, and six LTACH agencies to the 

joint venture during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The Company acquired majority ownership of the membership interests 

of these agencies. These providers conduct home health and hospice operations in Louisiana and Texas, conduct inpatient hospice 

operations in Texas, conduct community-based operations in Texas; and conduct LTACH operations in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas.

F-12

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   12

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

In separate transactions, the Company acquired five home health agencies, two hospice agencies, and one pharmacy during the twelve 

months ended December 31, 2017.

The total aggregate purchase price for these transactions was $80.2 million, of which $10.4 million was paid in December 2016 and 

$64.6 million was paid in cash during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The difference between the total aggregate purchase 

price and cash payments relates to acquired liabilities for each business combination. The purchase prices were determined based on 

the Company’s analysis of comparable acquisitions and the target market’s potential future cash flows.

The fair values assigned to certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed in relation to the Company’s acquisition that occurred during  

the third and fourth quarters of 2017 have been prepared on a preliminary basis with information currently available and are subject  

to change. Specifically, the Company is further assessing the valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired and obligations 

assumed pending the final appraisals. The Company expects to finalize its analysis during 2018.

Goodwill generated from the acquisitions was recognized based on the expected contributions of each acquisition to the overall corporate 

strategy. The Company expects its portion of goodwill to be fully tax deductible. The acquisitions were accounted for under the acquisition 

method of accounting, and, accordingly, the accompanying financial information includes the results of operations of the acquired entities 

from the dates of acquisition.

The following table summarizes the aggregate consideration paid for the acquisitions and the amounts of the assets acquired and 

liabilities assumed at the acquisition dates, as well as their fair value at the acquisition dates and the noncontrolling interest acquired 

(amounts in thousands):

Consideration

Cash 

Fair value of total consideration transferred 

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Patient account receivable 
Trade name 

  Certificates of needs/licenses 

Other identifiable intangible assets 
Other assets and (liabilities), net 

Total identifiable assets 

Noncontrolling interest 

Goodwill, including noncontrolling interest of $34,409 

$ 75,028

75,028

5,679
14,238
20,207
6
2,143

42,273

  53,657

$ 86,412

Trade names, certificates of need and licenses are indefinite-lived assets and, therefore, not subject to amortization. Acquired trade names 

that are not being used actively are amortized over the estimated useful life on the straight line basis. Trade names are valued using the 

relief from royalty method, a form of the income approach. Certificates of needs are valued using the replacement cost approach based 

on registration fees and opportunity costs. Licenses are valued based on the estimated direct costs associated with recreating the asset, 

including opportunity costs based on an income approach. In the case of states with a moratorium in place, the licenses are valued using 

the multi period excess earnings method. The other identifiable assets include non-compete agreements that are amortized over the life  

of the agreements, ranging from one to three years. Noncontrolling interest is valued at fair value by applying a discount to the value of the 

acquired entity for lack of control.

The Company conducted preliminary assessments and recognized provisional amounts in its initial accounting for the acquisitions of 

majority ownership of two joint venture partnerships for all identified assets in accordance with the requirements of ASC 805. The Company 

is continuing its review of these matters during the measurement period. If new information about facts and circumstances that existed  

at the acquisition date is obtained and indicates adjustments are necessary, the acquisition accounting will be revised to adjust to the 

provisional amounts initially recognized.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-13

05759-LHC.indd   13

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

The following table contains unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement information assuming the 2017 acquisitions closed 

January 1, 2016 (amount in thousands, except earnings per share):

Net service revenue 
Operating income 
Net income 
Basic earnings per share 
Diluted earnings per share 

2017 

2016

1,126,909 
78,317 
52,300 
2.95 
2.91 

  1,043,166
73,779
38,520
2.19
2.18

The pro forma information presented above includes adjustments for (i) depreciation expense, (ii) amortization of identifiable intangible 

assets, (iii) income tax provision using the Company’s effective tax rate and (iv) estimate of additional costs to provide administrative 

costs for these locations. This pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results 

of operations that would have actually occurred. In addition, future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the  

pro forma information.

2016 Acquisitions

The total aggregate purchase price for the Company’s acquisitions, which closed in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, was 

$24.1 million, of which $23.1 million was paid in cash. The purchase prices are determined based on an analysis of comparable 

acquisitions and the target market’s potential future cash flows. The Company expects its portion of goodwill to be fully tax deductible.

4. Goodwill and Other Intangibles, Net

The following table summarizes changes in goodwill by reporting unit during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 

(amounts in thousands):

Home Health 
Reporting Unit 

Hospice 
Reporting Unit 

Community-Based  Facility-Based 
Reporting Unit 

Reporting Unit 

Balance as of December 31, 2015 
  Goodwill from acquisitions 
  Goodwill related to noncontrolling interests 
  Goodwill related to prior period net working  

  capital adjustments 

Balance as of December 31, 2016 
  Goodwill from acquisitions 
  Goodwill related to noncontrolling interests 
  Goodwill related to impairment on disposals 
  Goodwill related to prior year adjustments 
Balance as of December 31, 2017 

$ 202,995 
6,760 
580 

504 
$ 210,839 
  30,623 
  21,469 
(1,470) 
(5) 
$ 261,456 

$ 58,136 
  7,460 
355 

(1,717) 
$ 64,234 
  15,000 
  9,580 
— 
— 
$ 88,814 

$ 17,972 
848 
— 

— 
$ 18,820 
  6,220 
  3,501 
— 
— 
$ 28,541 

$ 11,591 
  1,493 
340 

— 
$ 13,424 
160 
(141) 
— 
347 
$ 13,790 

Total

$ 290,694
  16,561
1,275

(1,213)
$ 307,317
  52,003
  34,409
(1,470)
342
$ 392,601

The Company determined that there was no impairment for the goodwill of any reporting units as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 

based on the Company’s annual impairment testing; however, the Company did record $1.5 million of disposal of goodwill during the  

year ended December 31, 2017 due to the closure of underperforming locations. The amount of disposal of goodwill was determined 

using prices of comparable business in the market. This was recorded in impairment of intangibles and other on the Company’s 

consolidated statements of income.

The Company performed an impairment analysis on its indefinite-lived intangible assets related to the Company’s trade names, licenses 

and certificates of need and determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair values of the indefinite-lived intangible assets are less 

than its carrying amount as of November 30, 2017.

F-14

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   14

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following tables summarize the changes in intangible assets during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 

(amounts in thousands):

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Indefinite-lived assets:

Trade names 
Certificates of need/licenses 

  Total 

Amortizing assets:
  Trade names 

Non-compete agreements 
Total 

Balance at December 31, 2017 

Indefinite-lived assets:

Trade names 
Certificates of need/licenses 
Total 

Amortizing assets:
Trade names 
Non-compete agreements 
Total 

Balance at December 31, 2016 

Remaining 
Useful Life 

Indefinite 
Indefinite 

4 months – 10 years 
2 months – 2 years 

Remaining 
Useful Life 

Indefinite 
Indefinite 

8 months – 9 years 
2 months – 3 years 

December 31, 2017

Gross 
Carrying 
Amount 

$  78,299
  53,493 
  131,792 

  10,127 
5,732
15,859
$ 147,651

Accumulated 
Amortization 

$ 

—
— 
— 

(7,547) 
(5,494) 
(13,041) 
$ (13,041) 

December 31, 2016

Gross 
Carrying 
Amount 

$  64,672
33,327
$  97,999

$  9,294
5,681 
14,975
$ 112,974

Accumulated 
Amortization 

$ 

$ 

—
—
—

$  (5,991) 
(4,977) 
(10,968) 
$ (10,968) 

Net
Carrying
Amount

$  78,299
  53,493
  131,792

2,580
238
2,818
$ 134,610

Net
Carrying
Amount

$  64,672
33,327
$  97,999

$  3,303
704
4,007
$ 102,006

Intangible assets of $88.1 million, net of accumulated amortization, related to the home health services segment, $32.0 million related to the 

hospice segment, $9.5 million related to the community-based services segment and $5.0 million related to the facility-based services 

segment as of December 31, 2017. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $2.1 million, $2.5 million 

and $1.9 million, respectively, which was recorded in general and administrative expenses.

The estimated intangible asset amortization expense for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2017 is as follows (amounts 

in thousands):

Year  

2018   
2019   
2020   
2021   
2022   

Total   

Amortization
Amount

$ 1,467
448
236
105
100

$ 2,356

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-15

05759-LHC.indd   15

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

5. Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred taxes  

are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the 

enacted tax laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows 

(amounts in thousands):

Deferred tax assets:

Allowance for uncollectible accounts 
Accrued employee benefits 
Stock compensation 
Accrued self-insurance 
Acquisition costs 
Net operating loss carry forward 
Intangible asset impairment 
Uncertain tax position—state tax portion 
Uncertain tax position - interest expense 
Other  
Capital loss carryforward 

Valuation allowance 

Deferred tax assets 

Deferred tax liabilities:

Amortization of intangible assets 

  Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation 
  Prepaid expenses 
  Non-accrual experience accounting method 

  Deferred tax liabilities 

Net deferred tax liability 

2017 

2016

$  5,224
4,147
663
2,157
2,064
1,299
21
—
—
91
12

$  9,735
5,532
1,004
2,762
1,781
1,880
38
63
90
155
154

(44) 

(44)

$  15,634 

$  23,150

  (35,955) 
(5,988) 
(623) 
(534) 

  (43,100) 

$ (27,466) 

  (45,622)
(8,397)
(817)
(255)

  (55,091)

$ (31,941)

Based on the Company’s historical pattern of taxable income, the Company believes it will produce sufficient income in the future to 

realize its deferred income tax assets. Management provides a valuation allowance for any net deferred tax assets when it is more likely 

than not that a portion of such net deferred tax assets will not be recovered.

The components of the Company’s income tax expense from continuing operations, less noncontrolling interest, were as follows 

(amounts in thousands):

Current:

Federal 
  State   

Deferred:
  Federal 
  State   

Total income tax expense 

2017 

2016 

2015

$ 12,798
  2,621 

  15,419 

(6,273) 
  1,798 

(4,475) 

$ 10,944 

$ 12,563 
  2,371 

  14,934 

  6,223 
  1,019 

  7,242 

$ 22,176 

$ 18,094
  3,232

  21,326

  1,389
133

  1,522

$ 22,848

F-16

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   16

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A reconciliation of the difference between the federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for income taxes for each 

period is as follows:

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Federal statutory tax rate 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit 
Nondeductible expenses 
Uncertain tax position 
TCJA Enactment 
Excess Tax Benefit 
Credits and other 

Effective tax rate 

2017 

35.0% 
4.4
3.2
—
(22.9) 
(1.6) 
(0.1) 

18.0% 

2016 

35.0%
3.8
2.6
(3.3) 
—
—
(0.4) 

37.7%

2015

35.0%
3.9
2.5
—
—
—
—

41.4%

The Company is subject to both federal tax and state income tax for jurisdictions within which it operates. Within these jurisdictions, the 

Company is open to examination for tax years ended after December 31, 2013.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted significant changes to U.S. tax law following the passage and signing of “Tax Cuts and Jobs 

Act” or the “TCJA”. The TCJA is complex and significantly changes the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other things, 

reducing the Federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. Given the significant changes resulting from the TCJA, the estimated 

financial impacts for fourth-quarter and full-year 2017 are provisional and subject to further analysis, interpretation and clarification of  

the TCJA, which could result in changes to these estimates during 2018.

The reduction in the corporate tax rate under the TCJA will require a one-time revaluation of certain deferred tax-related assets and 

liabilities to reflect their value at the lower corporate tax rate of 21%. As such, the Company experienced a reduction in the value of these 

assets and liabilities of approximately $14.0 million. This reduction in value is based on balances as of December 31, 2017. Solely 

based on this reduction in deferred tax assets and liabilities, the Company experienced a decrease in the provision for income taxes of 

approximately $14.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, which reduced the effective tax rate by 22.9%.

No material uncertain tax positions exist as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, $1.3 million was recorded in income  

tax payable as an unrecognized tax benefit which, if recognized, would decrease the Company’s effective tax rate. All of the Company’s 

unrecognized tax benefit is due to the settlement with the United States of America, which was announced September 30, 2011.  

On July 31, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued a notice of proposed adjustment asserting that a portion of the original tax 

deduction claimed by the Company associated with the settlement of the United States of America should be disallowed. In 

December 2016, the Company signed a final settlement offer from the IRS that reduced the unrecognized tax benefit from $3.4 million to 

$1.3 million. The Company received approval from Joint Committee Review in February 2017 to finalize the settlement. The settlement 

was paid in the second quarter of 2017. No other material uncertain tax positions exist as of December 31, 2017. A reconciliation of the 

total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits follows (amounts in thousands):

Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016  

Increases (decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of:

Tax positions taken during the current period 

Total unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2017  

$  1,315

  (1,315)

$  —

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and general and administrative 

expenses, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized an increase of $0.02 million in interest 

expense due to the final settlement paid related to the overall uncertain tax position. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 

2015, the Company recognized $0.2 million each year in interest expense, and recorded an accrued liability of interest payments related 

to uncertain tax positions.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-17

05759-LHC.indd   17

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

6. Debt

Credit Facility

On June 18, 2014, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Capital One, National Association, which 

provides a senior, secured revolving line of credit commitment with a maximum principal borrowing limit of $225.0 million and a letter  

of credit sub-limit equal to $15.0 million. The expiration date of the Credit Agreement is June 18, 2019. Revolving loans under the Credit 

Agreement bear interest at either a (1) Base Rate, which is defined as a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the Federal 

Funds Rate in effect on such day plus 0.5% (b) the Prime Rate in effect on such day and (c) the Eurodollar Rate for a one month interest 

period on such day plus 1.0%, plus a margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.5% per annum or (2) Eurodollar rate plus a margin ranging from 

1.75% to 2.5% per annum. Swing line loans bear interest at the Base Rate. Borrowings under a Base Rate or Eurodollar Rate may be 

outstanding at any time; however, there shall not be more than 15 Eurodollar borrowings outstanding at any given time. The Company is 

required to pay a commitment fee for the unused commitments at rates ranging from 0.225% to 0.375% per annum depending upon  

the Company’s consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Base Rate at December 31, 2017 was 5.50% and 

the Eurodollar rate was 3.57%. As of December 31, 2017, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 3.43%.

As of December 31, 2017 the Company had $144.0 million drawn and letters of credit in the amount of $9.6 million outstanding under the 

credit facility. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $87.0 million drawn and letters of credit in the amount of $11.0 million 

outstanding under the credit facility.

The scheduled principal payments on long-term debt for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2017 is as follows 

(amounts in thousands):

Year 

2018   
2019   
2020   
2021   
2022   

Total   

7. Stockholders’ Equity

Equity Based Awards

Principal Payment Amount

$ 

286
144,000
—
—
—

$ 144,286

At the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2010 Long Term 

Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”). The 2010 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s 

Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). A total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved and 

391,737 shares are available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan. A variety of discretionary awards for 

employees, officers, directors and consultants are authorized under the 2010 Incentive Plan, including incentive or non-qualified statutory 

stock options and nonvested stock. All awards must be evidenced by a written award certificate which will include the provisions specified 

by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will determine the exercise price for non-statutory stock options, which 

cannot be less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant.

In the event of a change of control as defined in the 2010 Incentive Plan, all restricted periods and restrictions imposed on non-performance 

based restricted stock awards will lapse and outstanding options will become immediately exercisable in full.

Share Based Compensation

Nonvested Stock

The Company issues stock-based compensation to employees in the form of nonvested stock, which is an award of common stock 

subject to certain restrictions. The awards, which the Company calls nonvested shares, generally vest over a five year period, conditioned 

on continued employment for the full incentive period. Compensation expense for the nonvested stock is recognized for the awards 

that are expected to vest. The expense is based on the fair value of the awards on the date of grant recognized on a straight-line basis 

over the requisite service period, which generally relates to the vesting period.

F-18

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   18

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

During 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, 139,310, 220,800 and 182,865 nonvested shares were granted to employees pursuant to the 

2010 Incentive Plan.

The Company also issues nonvested stock to its independent directors of the Company’s Board of Directors. During 2017, 2016 and 

2015, respectively, 11,700, 15,300 and 16,200 nonvested shares of stock were granted to the independent directors under the 2005 

Director Compensation Plan. The shares issued under the 2005 Director Compensation Plan were drawn from the 1,500,000 shares 

reserved for issuance under the 2010 Incentive Plan. The shares fully vest one year from the date of the grant, except for grants provided 

to new directors, which vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

The fair value of nonvested shares is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s shares on the grant date. The 

weighted average grant date fair values of nonvested shares granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were 

$48.52, $37.99 and $34.06, respectively.

The following table represents the nonvested stock activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Nonvested shares outstanding at January 1, 2017 
  Granted  
  Vested    
  Forfeited 

Nonvested shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 

Number 
of Shares 

  574,711 
  151,010 
(192,463) 
(3,793) 

  529,465 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

$ 31.61
  48.52
  28.95
  39.30

$ 37.34

As of December 31, 2017, there was $13.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested shares granted. That 

cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.99 years. The total fair value of shares vested in the year ended 

December 31, 2017 was $5.6 million and the total fair value of shares vested in the years December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $4.5 million 

and $4.1 million, respectively. The Company records compensation expense related to non-vested share awards at the grant date for 

shares that are awarded fully vested and over the vesting term on a straight line basis for shares that vest over time. The Company has 

recorded $6.0 million, $4.9 million and $4.2 million in compensation expense related to non-vested stock grants in the years ended 

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2006, the Company adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan allowing eligible employees to purchase the Company’s common 

stock at 95% of the market price on the last day of each calendar quarter. There were 250,000 shares reserved for the plan.

On June 20, 2013, the Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders. As a 

result of the amendment, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was modified as follows:

•  An additional 250,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance over the term of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

•  The term of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was extended from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2023.

The following table represents the shares issued during 2017, 2016 and 2015 under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan:

Shares available as of December 31, 2014 
Shares issued in 2015 
Shares issued in 2016 
Shares issued in 2017 

Shares available as of December 31, 2017 

Treasury Stock

Weighted
Average
Per Share
Price

$ 34.37
$ 37.79
$ 55.40

Number 
of Shares 

236,483
22,723
  24,149 
  18,542 

171,069

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-19

05759-LHC.indd   19

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

In conjunction with the vesting of the non-vested shares of stock, recipients incur personal income tax obligations. The Company 

allows the recipients to turn in shares of common stock to satisfy those personal tax obligations. The Company redeemed 61,825, 

52,119 and 42,197 shares of common stock related to these tax obligations during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 

2015, respectively.

8. Leases

The Company leases office space and equipment at its various locations. Many of the leases contain renewal options with varying terms 

and conditions. Management expects that in the normal course of business, expiring leases will be renewed or, upon making a decision  

to relocate, replaced by leases for new locations. Operating lease terms range from three to ten years. Rent expense includes insurance, 

maintenance, and other costs as required by the lease. Total rental expense was $25.1 million, $20.8 million and $20.7 million for the 

years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company began participating in a fleet program during 2014. The program allows employees that drive over 12,000 miles on an 

annual basis to qualify for a vehicle; all participation is voluntary. The individual operating leases are for a minimum of 12 months. Fleet 

expense was $1.2 million, $5.3 million and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The fleet 

program was terminated during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year 

2018   
2019   
2020   
2021   
2022   
Thereafter 

9. Employee Benefit Plan

Defined Contribution Plan

Total

$ 23,119
  16,408
  12,120
  8,881
  5,514
  7,172

$ 73,214

The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan for all eligible employees. The plan allows participants to contribute up to $18,000 in 2017, tax 

deferred (subject to IRS guidelines). The plan also allows discretionary Company contributions as determined by the Company’s Board of 

Directors. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company implemented a discretionary match of up to two percent of participating employee 

contributions. The employer contribution will vest 20% after two years and 20% each additional year until it is fully vested in year six. 

Contribution expense to the Company was $7.9 million, $6.3 million and $5.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 

2015, respectively.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

The Company provides services in a highly regulated industry and is a party to various proceedings and regulatory and other governmental 

and internal audits and investigations in the ordinary course of business (including audits by Zone Program Integrity Contractors (“ZPICs”) 

and Recovery Audit Contractors (“RACs”) and investigations resulting from the Company’s obligation to self-report suspected violations of 

law). Management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any regulatory and other governmental and internal audits and investigations. 

While such audits and investigations are the subject of administrative appeals, the appeals process, even if successful, may take several 

years to resolve. The Department of Justice, CMS, or other federal and state enforcement and regulatory agencies may conduct additional 

investigations related to the Company’s businesses in the future. These audits and investigations have caused and could potentially 

continue to cause delays in collections, recoupments from governmental payors. Currently, the Company has recorded $16.9 million in 

other assets, which are from government payors related to the disputed finding of pending ZPIC audits. Additionally, these audits may 

F-20

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   20

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

subject the Company to sanctions, damages, extrapolation of damage findings, additional recoupments, fines, and other penalties (some 

of which may not be covered by insurance), which may, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the 

Company’s business and financial condition.

On January 18, 2018, Jordan Rosenblatt, a purported shareholder of Almost Family, Inc. (“Almost Family”) filed a complaint for Violations  

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, styled Rosenblatt v. Almost 

Family, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-40-TBR (the “Rosenblatt Action”). The Rosenblatt Action was filed against the Company, Almost 

Family, Almost Family’s board of directors, and Hammer Merger Sub. The complaint in the Rosenblatt Action (“Complaint”) asserts that the 

Form S-4 Registration Statement (“Registration Statement”) filed on December 21, 2017 contains false and misleading statements with 

respect to the Merger. The Complaint asserts claims against Almost Family and its board of directors for violations of Section 14(a) of the 

1934 Act in connection with the dissemination of the Registration Statement, and asserts claims against the Almost Family board of 

directors and the Company for violations of Section 20(a) of the 1934 Act as controlling persons of Almost Family. The Rosenblatt Action 

seeks, among other things, an injunction enjoining the Merger from closing and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

In addition to the Rosenblatt Action, two additional complaints were filed against Almost Family in the United States District Court for  

the District of Delaware alleging similar violations as the Rosenblatt Action. While the Company is not named as a party in either of these 

additional complaints, these additional complaints also seek, among other things, an injunction enjoining both the vote of the Almost 

Family stockholders with respect to the Merger and the closing of the Merger, monetary damages and an award of attorneys’ fees and 

costs from Almost Family.

The Company believes that the claims asserted in these lawsuits are entirely without merit and intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously.

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation  

cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect, after 

considering the effect of the Company’s insurance coverage, on the Company’s consolidated financial information.

Joint Venture Buy/Sell Provisions

Most of the Company’s joint ventures include a buy/sell option that grants to the Company and its joint venture partners the right to 

require the other joint venture party to either purchase all of the exercising member’s membership interests or sell to the exercising 

member all of the non-exercising member’s membership interest, at the non-exercising member’s option, within 30 days of the receipt of 

notice of the exercise of the buy/sell option. In some instances, the purchase price is based on a multiple of the historical or future 

earnings before income taxes and depreciation and amortization of the equity joint venture at the time the buy/sell option is exercised. In 

other instances, the buy/sell purchase price will be negotiated by the partners and subject to a fair market valuation process. The 

Company has not received notice from any joint venture partners of their intent to exercise the terms of the buy/sell agreement nor has  

the Company notified any joint venture partners of its intent to exercise the terms of the buy/sell agreement.

Compliance

The laws and regulations governing the Company’s operations, along with the terms of participation in various government programs, 

regulate how the Company does business, the services offered and its interactions with patients and the public. These laws and 

regulations, and their interpretations, are subject to frequent change. Changes in existing laws or regulations, or their interpretations, or  

the enactment of new laws or regulations could materially and adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial condition.

The Company is subject to various routine and non-routine governmental reviews, audits and investigations. In recent years, federal and state 

civil and criminal enforcement agencies have heightened and coordinated their oversight efforts related to the health care industry, including 

referral practices, cost reporting, billing practices, joint ventures and other financial relationships among health care providers. Violation of the 

laws governing the Company’s operations, or changes in the interpretation of those laws, could result in the imposition of fines, civil or 

criminal penalties, and/or termination of the Company’s rights to participate in federal and state-sponsored programs and suspension or 

revocation of the Company’s licenses. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-21

05759-LHC.indd   21

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LHC GROUP

11. Segment Information

The Company’s segments consist of home health services, hospice services, community-based services, and facility-based services.  

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The following tables summarize the Company’s segment information for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 

(amounts in thousands):

Net service revenue 
Cost of service revenue 
Provision for bad debts 
General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets 

Operating income 
Interest expense 
Non-operating income 

Income before income taxes and  
  noncontrolling interests 
Income tax expense 

Net income 
Less net income (loss) attributable to  
  noncontrolling interests 

Home Health 
Services 

$ 783,507
  482,179 
5,924 
  229,264 
1,511 
101 

  64,528 
(2,906) 
360 

  61,982 
9,509 

  52,473 

9,102 

Year Ended December 31, 2017 

Hospice 
Services 

$ 159,197
  103,969 
1,910 
  45,516 
— 
22 

7,780 
(582) 
71 

7,269 
1,057 

6,212 

1,248 

Community-  

Facility- 

Based Services  Based Services 

Total

$ 46,909 
  35,244 
750 
  9,946 
— 
— 

969 
(194) 
3 

778 
156 

622 

$ 82,473 
  54,418 
900 
  25,813 
— 
(63) 

  1,405 
(194) 
90 

  1,301 
222 

  1,079 

$ 1,072,086
675,810
9,484
310,539
1,511
60

74,682
(3,876)
524

71,330
10,944

60,386

(111) 

35 

10,274

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s  
  common stockholders 
Total assets 

$  43,371 
$ 534,385 

$  4,964 
$ 155,230 

733 
$ 
$ 48,216 

$  1,044 
$ 55,871 

50,112
$ 
$  793,702

Year Ended December 31, 2016 

Community-  

Facility- 

Based Services  Based Services 

Total

Net service revenue 
Cost of service revenue 
Provision for bad debts 
General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 
Loss on disposal of assets 

Operating income 
Interest expense 
Non-operating income 

Income before income taxes and  
  noncontrolling interests 
Income tax expense 

Net income 
Less net income (loss) attributable to  
  noncontrolling interests 

Home Health 
Services 

$ 665,896
  398,450 
9,609 
  203,418 
— 
857 

  53,562 
(2,216) 
422 

  51,768 
  16,505 

  35,263 

6,876 

Hospice 
Services 

$ 134,948
  83,359 
3,401 
  37,207 
— 
338 

  10,643 
(317) 
25 

$ 43,891 
  32,603 
797 
  8,785 
— 
49 

  1,657 
(144) 
14 

  10,351 
3,485 

  1,527 
651 

6,866 

1,867 

876 

(58) 

$ 70,088 
  43,238 
983 
  21,212 
— 
(45) 

  4,700 
(259) 
31 

  4,472 
  1,535 

  2,937 

$  914,823
557,650
14,790
270,622
—
1,199

70,562
(2,936)
492

68,118
22,176

45,942

674 

9,359

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s  
  common stockholders 
Total assets 

$  28,387 
$ 427,782 

$  4,999 
$ 116,090 

$ 
934 
$ 33,520 

$  2,263 
$ 36,679 

$ 
36,583
$  614,071

F-22

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   22

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

Year Ended December 31, 2015 

Home Health 
Services 

Hospice 
Services 

Community-  

Facility- 

Based Services  Based Services 

Total

$ 613,188
  354,750 
  15,736 
  190,591 
1,245 
544 

  50,322 
(1,819) 
397 

  48,900 
  17,173 

  31,727 

7,424 

$  85,854
  50,906 
1,002 
  26,437 
— 
80 

7,429 
(253) 
38 

7,214 
2,541 

4,673 

1,077 

$ 41,202 
  29,076 
  1,816 
  8,465 
28 
41 

  1,776 
(23) 
3 

$ 76,122 
  46,146 
689 
  22,426 
— 
45 

  6,816 
(207) 
19 

$ 816,366
  480,878
  19,243
  247,919
1,273
710

  66,343
(2,302)
457

  1,756 
787 

  6,628 
  2,347 

  64,498
  22,848

969 

  4,281 

  41,650

(144) 

958 

9,315

Net service revenue 
Cost of service revenue 
Provision for bad debts 
General and administrative expenses 
Impairment of intangibles and other 
Loss on disposal of assets 

Operating income 
Interest expense 
Non-operating income 

Income before income taxes and  
  noncontrolling interests 
Income tax expense 

Net income 
Less net income attributable to  
  noncontrolling interests 

Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s  
  common stockholders 
Total assets 

$  24,303 
$ 394,392 

$  3,596 
$ 101,641 

$  1,113 
$ 31,235 

$  3,323 
$ 38,786 

$  32,335
$ 566,054

12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values. The 

estimated fair value of intangible assets was calculated using level 3 inputs based on the present value of anticipated future benefits.  

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value as the interest rates 

approximates current rates.

13. Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

The following table summarizes the activity and ending balances in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the twelve months ended 

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (amounts in thousands):

Year  

2017   
2016   
2015   

14. Concentration of Risk

Beginning of Year 
Balance 

Additions 

Deductions 

$ 29,036
  26,712 
18,582

$  9,484
  14,790 
19,243

$ 14,964
  12,466 
11,113

End of Year
Balance

$ 23,556
  29,036
26,712

The Company’s facilities in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, and Tennessee accounted for approximately 55.0%, 58.4% and 

61.1% of net service revenue during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Any material change in the 

current economic or competitive conditions in these states could have a disproportionate effect on the Company’s overall business results.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-23

05759-LHC.indd   23

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LHC GROUP

15. Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Financial Information

The following table represents the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations (amounts in thousands, except share data):

Net service revenue 
Gross margin 
Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 
  Net income attributable to LHC Group Inc.’s common stockholders
Basic earnings per share: 
Diluted earnings per share: 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Basic 
  Diluted 

Net service revenue 
Gross margin 
Net income attributable to LHC Group, Inc.’s common stockholders 
  Net income attributable to LHC Group Inc.’s common stockholders
Basic earnings per share: 
Diluted earnings per share: 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  Basic 
  Diluted 

First Quarter 
2017 

$  246,618
92,248 
9,467 

$ 
$ 

0.54 
0.53 

Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter

2017 

2017 

2017

$ 

$ 
$ 

260,210 
99,052 
11,304 

$  272,872 
100,016 
10,906 

$  292,386
104,960
18,435

0.64 
0.63 

$ 
$ 

0.61 
0.61 

$ 
$ 

1.04
1.02

  17,643,463 
  17,817,880 

  17,728,567 
  17,964,387 

  17,740,818 
  18,010,522 

  17,749,872
  18,043,297

First Quarter 
2016 

$  222,552
86,951 
7,686 

$ 
$ 

0.44 
0.44 

Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter

2016 

2016 

2016

$ 

$ 
$ 

226,031 
88,903 
9,464 

$  230,797 
89,965 
9,616 

$  235,443
91,354
9,817

0.54 
0.54 

$ 
$ 

0.55 
0.54 

$ 
$ 

0.56
0.55

  17,485,766 
  17,633,549 

  17,566,097 
  17,685,147 

 17,588,163 
 17,719,473 

  17,597,190
  17,764,066

Because of the method used to calculate per share amounts, quarterly per share amounts may not necessarily total to the per share 

amounts for the entire year.

F-24

Form 10-K Part I V

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

05759-LHC.indd   24

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

16. Proposed Merger with Almost Family

On November 15, 2017, the Company announced the execution of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered 

into among the Company, Almost Family, Inc. (“Almost Family”), and Hammer Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary 

of the Company, providing for a “merger of equals” business combination of the Company and Almost Family. The Merger Agreement 

provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Almost Family (the 

“Merger”), with Almost Family continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which was unanimously approved by both our board of directors and the Almost Family board 

of directors, the stockholders of Almost Family will be entitled to receive 0.9150 shares of our common stock for each share of Almost 

Family common stock, plus the cash equivalent of any fractional share. Upon the closing of the Merger, the Company stockholders will 

own approximately 58.5% and the Almost Family stockholders will own approximately 41.5% of the combined company.

On February 22, 2018, the Company and Almost Family issued a joint press release announcing that the waiting period under the 

Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, with respect to the Merger, has expired, satisfying one of the important conditions 

to the proposed Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Almost Family, including if the Merger is not 

consummated on or before July 1, 2018 (subject to extension to October 1, 2018 in certain circumstances) and if the required approval of 

the stockholders of either the Company or Almost Family is not obtained. The Merger Agreement further provides that, upon termination 

of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including the termination of the Merger Agreement by the Company or Almost 

Family as a result of an adverse change in the recommendation of the other party’s board of directors, the Company may be required  

to pay to Almost Family, or Almost Family may be required to pay to the Company, as applicable, a termination fee of $30 million. Further, 

if the Merger Agreement is terminated as a result of the stockholders of either the Company or Almost Family failing to approve the 

transaction, the Company may be required to reimburse to Almost Family, or Almost Family may be required to reimburse to the Company, 

the other party’s expenses in connection with the proposed transaction, up to a maximum of $5 million.

The transaction, which is expected to be completed on April 1, 2018, is subject to the receipt of stockholder approvals and other 

customary closing conditions. For additional information concerning the proposed transaction is included in the final proxy statement/

prospectus, which was filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018 and can be accessed on the SEC’s website.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Form 10-K Part I V

F-25

05759-LHC.indd   25

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LHC GROUP

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to 

be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

LHC GROUP, INC.

/s/ KEITH G. MYERS

Keith G. Myers 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Chief Executive Officer 

March 1, 2018

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Keith G. Myers and 

Joshua L. Proffitt and either of them (with full power in each to act alone) as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power of substitution, 

for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K 

and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, 

hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by 

virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of 

the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature 

Title 

Date 

/s/ KEITH G. MYERS

Keith G. Myers 

/s/ JOSHUA L. PROFFITT 

Joshua L. Proffitt 

/s/ MONICA F. AZARE

Monica F. Azare 

/s/ JOHN B. BREAUX

John B. Breaux 

/s/ JOHN L. INDEST 

John L. Indest  

/s/ RONALD T. NIXON 

Ronald T. Nixon  

/s/ W.J. “BILLY” TAUZIN 

W.J. “Billy” Tauzin 

/s/ KENNETH E. THORP

Kenneth E. Thorpe 

/s/ BRENT TURNER

Brent Turner 

/s/ DAN S. WILFORD

Dan S. Wilford 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors 

March 1, 2018

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer  March 1, 2018

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

March 1, 2018

F-26

Form 10-K Part I V

Signatures

05759-LHC.indd   26

4/4/18   4:23 PM

LEADING THE CHANGE  National Growth – Community Focus

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number 

Description of Exhibits

2.1 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 15, 2017, by and among LHC Group, Inc., Hammer Merger Sub, Inc.,  

and Almost Family, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to LHC Group’s Form 8-K filed on November 16, 2017).

3.1 

Certificate of Incorporation of LHC Group, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to LHC Group’s Form S-1/A  

(File No. 333-120792) filed on February 14, 2005).

3.2 

Bylaws of LHC Group, Inc., as amended on December 3, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to LHC Group’s Form 

10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, filed on May 9, 2008).

4.1 

Specimen Stock Certificate of LHC Group’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to  

LHC Group’s Form S-1/A (File No. 333-120792) filed on February 14, 2005).

10.1+ 

LHC 2003 Key Employee Equity Participation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LHC Group’s Form S-1  

(File No. 333-120792) filed on November 26, 2004).

10.2+ 

LHC Group, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Form S-1/A (File No. 333-120792)  

filed on February 14, 2005).

10.3+ 

LHC Group, Inc. 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LHC Group’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly  

period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 6, 2010).

10.4+ 

LHC Group, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (previously filed as  

Exhibit 10.4 to LHC Group’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on March 11, 2015).

10.5+ 

Form of Indemnity Agreement between LHC Group and directors and certain officers (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to  

the Form S-1/A (File No. 333-120792) filed on February 14, 2005).

10.6+ 

LHC Group, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to LHC Group’s Form 8-K filed on  

June 16, 2006).

10.7 

Credit Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2014, among LHC Group, Inc., Capital One, National Association, as administrative  

agent, sole bookrunner, sole lead arranger, and a lender, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Regions Bank and Compass Bank,  

as co-syndication agents and lenders, and Whitney Bank, as a lender (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LHC Group’s  

Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2014).

10.8+ 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Keith G. Myers and LHC Group, Inc. dated April 1, 2014  

(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed April 4, 2014).

10.9+ 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Donald D. Stelly and LHC Group, Inc. dated June 1, 2016  

(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).

10.10+ 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Joshua L. Proffitt and LHC Group, Inc. dated September 12, 2016  

(previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed November 3, 2016).

10.11+ 

Amendment to LHC Group, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan,  

effective January 20, 2015. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LHC Group’s Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2015).

21.1 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1 

Consent of KPMG LLP.

Exhibit Index

Form 10-K Part I V

F-27

05759-LHC.indd   27

4/4/18   4:23 PM

 
 
LHC GROUP

Exhibit
Number 

Description of Exhibits

31.1 

Certification of Keith G. Myers, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to  

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 

Certification of Joshua L. Proffitt, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to  

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1* 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS  XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH  XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL  XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF  XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB  XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE  XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of this data are 

advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or 

prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related 

documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed.”

+ 

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.

*  This exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise 

subject to the liabilities of that Section, and the document will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

F-28

Form 10-K Part I V

Exhibit Index

05759-LHC.indd   28

4/4/18   4:23 PM

Corporate Information

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
KPMG LLP
301 Main Street, Suite 2150 • Baton Rouge, LA 70801
kpmg.com
Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC
6201 15th Avenue • Brooklyn, NY 11219
800.937.5449
Corporate Headquarters
LHC Group, Inc.
901 Hugh Wallis Road South • Lafayette, LA 70508
Phone: 866.LHC.GROUP • Fax: 337.235.8037
LHCgroup.com

Common Stock
LHC Group’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol 
“LHCG.” At March 23, 2018, the company had a total of approximately 9,850 shareholders, 
including stockholders of record and approximately 9,600 persons or entities holding common 
stock in nominee name.

Performance Graph
The graph below matches the cumulative 5-Year total return of holders of LHC Group, Inc.’s common 
stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index and a customized peer group 
of three companies that includes: Almost Family Inc., Amedisys Inc. and National Healthcare Corp. The 
graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, in each index, and in the peer group 
(including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017.

Performance Graph
Comparison of 5-Year Cumulative Total Return* Among LHC Group, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index and a Peer Group

$400 

$350

$300 

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

0
12/12 

12/13 

12/14 

12/15 

12/16 

12/17

LHC Group Inc. 
NASDAQ Composite 
Peer Group 

12/12 
$100.00  
$100.00  
$100.00  

12/13 
$112.86  
$141.63  
$127.71  

12/14 
$146.39  
$162.09  
$176.80  

12/15 
$212.63  
$173.33  
$212.02  

12/16 
$214.55  
$187.19  
$245.14  

12/17
$287.56
$242.29
$265.87

*$100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Leadership

Executive Officers

Keith G. Myers
Chief Executive Officer

Donald D. Stelly
President, Chief Operating Officer

Joshua L. Proffitt
Executive Vice President, 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 

Directors

Keith G. Myers
Chairman
Regulatory Affairs and 
Public Policy Committee

W. J. “Billy” Tauzin
Lead Independent Director
Co-Chair - Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy
  Committee
Nominating and Corporate Governance  
  Committee

Monica F. Azare
Chair - Compensation Committee
Clinical Quality Committee

John B. Breaux
Co-Chair - Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy   
  Committee
Corporate Development Committee

John L. Indest
Chair - Clinical Quality Committee
Corporate Development Committee

Ronald T. Nixon
Chair - Corporate Development Committee
Audit Committee  
Nominating and Corporate Governance  
  Committee

Kenneth E. Thorpe, PhD
Clinical Quality Committee
Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy Committee

Brent Turner
Chair - Audit Committee
Compensation Committee
Corporate Development Committee

Dan S. Wilford
Chair - Nominating and Corporate Governance  
  Committee
Audit Committee
Clinical Quality Committee
Compensation Committee

05759-Cvr-R1.indd  4

4/10/18  12:57 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
901 HUGH WALLIS ROAD SOUTH 
LAFAYETTE, LA 70508
1.866.LHC.GROUP
LHCgroup.com

05759-Cvr-R1.indd  1

4/10/18  12:56 PM