Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances / Lifetime Brands, Inc.

Lifetime Brands, Inc.

lcut · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker lcut
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Employees 1180
← All annual reports
FY2004 Annual Report · Lifetime Brands, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

A N N U A L   R E P O R T   2 0 0 4

COMPANY PROFILE

Lifetime Hoan Corporation is a leading designer, developer and marketer of a broad
range of branded consumer products used in the home, including  Kitchenware, Cutlery
and Cutting Boards, Bakeware and Cookware, Pantryware and Spices, Tabletop and
Bath Accessories.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

$200,000

 $10,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

'04

'03

'02

'01

'00

NET SALES
(in thousands)

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

'04

'03

'02

'01

'00

INCOME FROM
CONTINUING
OPERATIONS
(in thousands)

$0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

0.00

$50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

'04

'03

'02

'01

'00

0

'04

'03

'02

'01

'00

DILUTED
EARNINGS 
PER COMMON
SHARE FROM
CONTINUING
OPERATIONS

WORKING 
CAPITAL
(in thousands)

The KitchenAid® Cutlery Carousel; taking the
world's first silicone handle knives for a spin

DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

During 2004, we took a number of steps to build on the strengths of our proven business model and to
position our Company for future growth. Over the years, the three essential ingredients we have used to
forge our leadership position in the housewares industry are:

• An expanding portfolio of powerful brands

•  A proven track record of innovation and design excellence

•  Superior sourcing capabilities

Our consistent focus on each of these areas has enabled Lifetime to grow and prosper, and, we believe,
will continue to provide a solid foundation for our future success.

An Expanding Portfolio of Powerful Brands
Lifetime owns or licenses some of the most powerful brands in housewares, enabling us to differentiate our
product lines in the eyes of both our retail customers and consumers. Our two top-selling brands are
KitchenAid® and Farberware®, which also rank as the #1 and #2 brands in kitchen gadgets and cutlery,
according to the HFN 2003 Brand survey. 

In 2004, we acquired the business and certain assets of Excel Importing Corp. This acquisition expanded
our brand portfolio and, as well, added an important new product category – Tabletop. Among the
brands we acquired was Sabatier®, a highly respected, upper-end brand that we expect will be a key
growth driver for Lifetime in the years to come.   

Proven Track Record of Innovation and Design Excellence
At the heart of our Company is a strong culture of new product development and design excellence. Our
unique in-house Product Development and Design Team, consisting of 35 professional designers and
engineers, is responsible for creating new products and packaging and merchandising concepts. This
Team utilizes state-of-the-art equipment that enables us to shorten product development time, expedite
the production process and “value-engineer” our products.  

Lifetime has an impressive record of developing exciting new products. In 2004, we introduced over 600
individual products. In addition, we applied for more than 30 utility and design patents over the past 
two years.

Superior Sourcing Capabilities
We have successfully sourced products overseas for more than 40 years. Moreover, we use our product
design capabilities to help our suppliers to reduce their production costs and to take advantage of lower-
cost raw materials. In 2004, we opened a second office in China and hired a Senior Vice President of
Sourcing, based in Shanghai.  

2004 Financial Results
In 2004, Lifetime’s net sales totaled a record $189.5 million, an increase of $29.1 million or 18% over 2003.
For the year, we reported net income of $8.5 million, compared to $8.4 million for 2003. Earnings per
diluted share for 2004 came to $0.75, compared to $0.78 for 2003.

Net sales in 2004 for the three businesses we acquired over the past 18 months, :USE®, Gemco® and Excel,
amounted to $14.3 million. The Company’s organic growth was driven primarily by strong sales across all
classifications of products sold under the KitchenAid® brand. 

In 2004, we implemented plans to strengthen our infrastructure. In particular, we bolstered our product

2004
2

LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

i c e r

f

i v e   O f

  E x e c u t

  a n d   C h i e f

  P r e s i d e n t

r e y   S i e g e l
r m a n   o f

f
J e f
C h a i

t h e   B o a r d ,

2004
3

 
  a n d  

  a n d   C E O )

  P r e s i d e n t
r m a n )

r m a n ,
( C h a i
( V i c e   C h a i

r e y   S i e g e l
J e f
f
R o n a l d   S h i

f

t a n  

2004
4

 
LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

development and design, overseas sourcing and sales and marketing teams. We also added key
executives in each of our growing business classifications. Although the increased cost of this infrastructure
did affect the Company’s year-over-year earnings comparison, we believe these additional resources will
have a very positive impact on Lifetime’s long-term growth. In addition, it should be noted that we incurred
over $900,000 in expenses related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance work in 2004, the equivalent of $0.05 
in earnings.  

As of December 31, 2004, stockholders’ equity was $92.9 million, the equivalent of $8.41 in book value 
per share.

In summary, 2004 was a successful year for Lifetime during which we implemented many initiatives to
expand our presence in the housewares industry and accelerate our future growth. We broadened our
portfolio of licensed and owned brands, added several new classifications, developed exciting new
products and pioneered new ways to use materials in our products. 

2005 
In 2005, we expect our results to reflect the benefits of the initiatives we put into place in 2004. 

The goal of broadening our portfolio of powerful brands, continuing to invest in enhancing our Product
Development and Design capabilities, strengthening our overseas sourcing organization and building our
infrastructure is to be able to create, source and distribute unique products targeted to consumers at
different price points in every major level of trade. 

For example, in our cutlery and cutting board businesses, the ability to offer products under the
KitchenAid®, Cuisinart®, Sabatier®, Farberware®, Hoffritz®, DBK™-Daniel Boulud Kitchen and Laguiole™
brands enables us to offer new, innovative higher-value products to which consumers can trade up, as well
as to provide better value and greater selection to consumers at more moderate price points.

We expect that a substantial portion of our growth in 2005 will come from the expansion of our shelf space
in a number of major retailers. At the beginning of the year, for example, we more than doubled our space
with one of our leading customers for KitchenAid® products. We estimate that the increased space at this
one customer alone should produce over $10 million in additional sales for Lifetime in 2005.  

Our results for 2005 should also benefit from the new categories we added in 2004. For example, the
Tabletop and Cookware categories that we acquired from Excel should contribute significantly in 2005. We
have redesigned many Excel’s Tabletop lines to bring them in line with our high standards for product and
packaging quality and style. 

In closing, we are proposing to change the name of our Company from Lifetime Hoan Corporation to
Lifetime Brands, Inc., reflecting the crucial role that well-known and well-respected brands play in our
business model. We believe this new name more accurately expresses one of Lifetime’s most important
attributes and key competitive strengths. We look forward to communicating with our shareholders,
customers and employees in the future using this new name to reinforce our most fundamental 
business strategy.  

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Siegel

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

2004
5

INNOVATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN 
AND BRAND MANAGEMENT

Lifetime Hoan Corporation’s growth in 2004 was
made possible, in large part, by the introduction
of over 600 new products. The goal for 2005 is to
introduce no fewer than 700 new items. This
remarkable achievement reflects our strong in-
house product design and development
capabilities. Our Product Design and
Development Team, consisting of 35 professional
designers and engineers, enables us to extend
our record of innovation and new product
introductions. This Team utilizes sophisticated
computer aided design technology that is also
capable of creating product prototypes in-house.  

Our designers collaborate closely with our
customers to create new, innovative and unique
products. We monitor design trends and
innovations in the overall consumer products
industry and attempt to apply new design
concepts to the categories in which we compete. 

We also utilize our design capabilities to help our
suppliers achieve manufacturing efficiencies and
we work with our suppliers to introduce new
manufacturing technologies. We have created
new ways to shorten development time and
speed up the production process. For example,
we use state-of-the-art rapid prototyping
machinery to bring ideas to reality in a fraction of
the time it would take using traditional modeling
methods. We also employ conceptual 3-D
presentation, which renders concepts quickly and
with such photorealism that customers can
immediately comprehend the design and 
offer feedback. 

We continue to invest in advanced design
equipment, software and continuing education to
ensure that we stay current with new design
technologies and capabilities. Together with our
ongoing research into materials and materials
science, these tools allow us to practice disruptive
technology; designing products that are unique
and bring a distinct and perceptible value to 
the consumer. 

KITCHENAID®

The success of the KitchenAid® brand continued
during 2004. We introduced over 130 new

KitchenAid® items in 2004.

Shipments of our new lines of KitchenAid® cutlery
commenced during the 4th quarter. Totaling over
60 new items, each of the lines features tempered
420J2 steel, a special high-carbon cutlery steel
that can be tapered to a perfect cutting edge.
The cutlery is offered in a number of handle
materials to suit every preference: hollow handle
stainless steel; super-strong Dupont Delrin®; triple-
riveted impact-resistant ABS, and even the world’s
first line of non-slip silicone. The cutlery is available
in open stock, in full sets and in multi-packs, such
as carving sets and steak knife sets.

Another major KitchenAid® introduction in 2004
was the salad spinner. Over a year and a half in
development, the salad spinner was a major
design and engineering challenge. The
KitchenAid® salad spinner requires only one hand
to control, can be loaded with fruits or vegetables
with no disassembly, has 2 easy-pour spouts for
dispensing the extracted water, comes with 3
dividers for the main basket, which allows
simultaneous spinning of multiple fruits and
vegetables without having them mix together, has
a soft silicone ring on the handle and base to
prevent slipping, and a clear 6-quart capacity
outer bowl that can be used for both storage 
and serving. 

Specialty tools and gadgets were also a focus for
KitchenAid® in 2004. We introduced carrot and
potato peelers that use curved cutlery-grade steel
blades that follow the contour of the vegetables,
an oversized pancake turner, a specially shaped
omelet turner and dual-purpose “turner tongs,”
which can be used to effortlessly to flip an omelet
or grab a piece of corn on the cob. New sets of
food preparation bowls and mixing bowls were
also well received, as were a citrus juicer, gravy
separator, turkey grabbers, cheese and food mill
and an oversized colander. We also introduced a
new line of high heat resistant nylon tools in a
countertop ceramic crock as well as a series of
kitchen brushes. 

In development for 2005 under the KitchenAid®
brand, is a mandoline slicer, with a unique spring-
loaded blade cover system that continually

2004
6

t c h e n A i d ® S a l a d   S p i n n e r
t h   b e a u t y  

;
s p a r e

t o  

  w i

i o n ,

t h e   K i
f u n c t

t h  
  w i
i c i e n t
f

t h e   w h e e l
- e f
s u p e r

i n g  
R e i n v e n t
o n e - h a n d e d ,

2004
7

 
 
 
i c o n e   b a k e w a r e   m o l d s

l

s i

l o w e r

s u n f

t c h e n A i d ® r o s e   a n d  

  K i

;

s

i g h t

t h l y   d e l

  e a r

A   g a r d e n   o f

guards the user’s hand from the slicing blade.
Other kitchenware items for 2005 will be new all-
stainless steel kitchen and serving tools, tools and
gadgets featuring brushed stainless steel handles
and a line of copper handle kitchenware with
satin nickel accents. Other innovative products will
include a fruit slicer with soft grip handles and a
cookie gun with 16 discs that conveniently store
inside the body of the cookie maker. We are also
planning to launch a complete line of KitchenAid®
sink accessories. 

Silicone continues to grow as a significant material
in housewares. We introduced the world’s first full
line of silicone tools under the KitchenAid® brand

in 2001. In 2004, we expanded our selection to
include a unique over-molded silicone trivet,
pastry and basting brushes with easy-to-clean
heat resistant silicone bristles, an oversized
silicone spoon rest and a non-stick coated rolling
pin, featuring weighted silicone handles that
automatically return to the horizontal position. In
development for introduction in early 2005 are
two lines of silicone handle tools and gadgets,
stainless steel and nylon tongs, each featuring
silicone grips and a new series of silicone handle
barbecue equipment featuring heavy-duty zinc
alloy castings and stainless steel. 

In addition to the world-class design, innovation

2004
8

 
LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

and unparalleled quality that are the hallmarks of
our line of KitchenAid® products, we have re-
introduced color into the kitchen. The initial
offerings of KitchenAid® kitchenware were in 8
colors, and their success at retail revolutionized
the look of kitchen accessories and heightened
the demand for a broader selection. In 2004, we
introduced 8 new colors, ranging from “spring
bright” to “spice” colors, to tangerine and pink (a
percentage of the sales of pink also benefit breast
cancer research). This explosion of color has been
effective at all levels of retail trade and across all
levels of consumer trends.

KitchenAid® silicone bakeware continued to
experience significant sales growth at retail. We
added 12 more items to our silicone bakeware
line in 2004, expanding into more unique shapes
and specialty designs and three sizes of silicone
baking mats, perfect for baking prep work or even
as liners for the bottom of ovens. For 2005, we
have created new bakeware designs in silicone,
such as a sunflower, a rose, an ornate “fancy”
tube cake pan, as well as 4 sets of mini molds,
organized in themes such as “holiday” 
or “animals”.  

KitchenAid® metal bakeware continues to remain
strong at retail, with the introduction of 9 new
items for 2004. For this year, we will launch a line
of cast bakeware, featuring remarkably detailed
cast sculptures, such as a Tudor Village and
Victorian House that can used to create unique
cake designs. We expect this category to be a
major opportunity for growth and already have
another group of creative designs in the works.

During 2004, we completed the designs for the
new line of KitchenAid® ceramic bakeware, which
will consist of over 50 items and feature silicone
grips on almost every piece. The ceramic
bakeware is oven, broiler, microwave and freezer
safe, with oversized handles and featuring a
beautiful “wave” pattern design. The silicone grips
allow for ease of handling, cool quickly if left on
the ceramic dishes in the oven, and are color
matched to the bakeware. The line will begin to
ship in spring of 2005 and the initial response from
retailers is overwhelmingly positive.

In 2005, we also expect to introduce a line of

KitchenAid® brand pantryware, including a spice
rack and salt and pepper grinders, featuring
ceramic grinding mechanisms, in a variety of
finishes and colors. We will also debut a paper
towel holder, featuring our patented PerfectTear®
technology that enables simple, one-handed use. 

FARBERWARE®

Our lineup of Farberware® cutlery and cutting
boards saw key additions in 2004 that quickly
became major success stories. High value, large
piece-count block sets in triple-riveted lines,
including new 14-piece and 23-piece Classic
Forged sets were strong sellers, as were the large
sets in the new Traditions series. The Japanese-
inspired santoku knife, in various sizes,
spearheaded sales of all levels of Farberware®
cutlery. Recognizing growing consumer
preferences for darker woods, we have created a
new line of Farberware® cutlery with pakka wood
handles. We also brought to market 9 new cutting
board designs in environmentally-friendly,
plantation-grown bamboo, as well as wood
boards with stainless steel handles and curved
wood paddle boards.

We introduced over 100 new Farberware® tools
and gadgets, including Farberware® Preferred
and Farberware® Commercial, which features
heavy-duty alloy castings. We created
Farberware® Innovations, perhaps the most
exciting group of Farberware® kitchenware ever to
come to market. Innovations will begin to ship in
spring of 2005 and every item will be truly unique
in design and breakthrough in function. There are
over 70 original items being developed and over
30 will be available by end of the 2nd quarter. 

We introduced 24 new Farberware® barbecue
items in 2004; including a silicone handle line of
equipment and tools in both black and red, and a
newly designed instant-read digital barbecue
thermometer fork. We also have designed a
selection of unique Barbecue Innovations items
that will be available in 2005, including folding
and adjustable wire cooking grids, as well as a
barbecue cutlery set and shears, each in
magnetized holders that can easily attach to 
the grill. 

2004
9

CUISINART®

Cuisinart® cutlery remains the standard-bearer for
quality, performance and design. In addition to
the Continental and Ultra Edge lines, we added a
Triple-Riveted series in 2004, featuring extra-wide
bolsters for safety and balance. We also launched
an engineering first, the patented Knife Vault™.
The exterior of the Knife Vault™ is designed to
coordinate with the popular Cuisinart® countertop
electrics. The interior houses a complete 15-piece
collection of Continental series cutlery. The Knife
Vault™ utilizes a revolutionary locking mechanism
that makes it secure to leave on the countertop
for families with children. The Company will be
introducing a second version of the Knife Vault™ 
in 2005. 

KAMENSTEIN®

With the release of over 150 new items, the
Kamenstein® brand had a number of major
success stories in 2004, including the patented
PerfectTear® paper towel holder. The Company
released 10 versions of this unique product, which
uses an internal gearing system that allows for
simple one-handed use. By mid-2005 there will be
over 35 versions available in all key basic and
trend colors, as well as the special electroplated
metal finishes and material combinations found in
today’s kitchens; satin nickel, polished copper,
burnished copper, chrome, burnished bronze,
distressed black, gum metal, ceramic with wood,
and wire in either black or chrome. The
PerfectTear® has transformed the countertop
paper towel holder from a kitchen basic into a
functional and decorative kitchen necessity. 

In 2004, Kamenstein®  also unveiled the Can-Do™
line of colorful and stylish storage products, which
combine magnetic bulletin boards in 3 sizes, with
a variety of round, square, and rectangular
containers with see-through tops that can be used
to easily sort and store a variety of items, from
spices to desk accessories. There are also
cylindrical-shaped holders, holders for paper,
pens and pencils, 3 sizes of magnetic picture
frames, magnetic clips and sets of “reminder”
magnets for important events or activities like
birthday parties or doctor’s appointments. For

t S p i c e ™  
i z e d   S m a r
  a n y   c o n d i m e n t
s

r a c k
  q u e r y

t h e   c o m p u t e r
  a n s w e r
t h a t

  c o m p a n y ;
i n   e n c y c l o p e d i a  
l o v e s
-
t
l

G e n i u s
t h   b u i
w i

2004
10

 
 
LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

2005, the Company will be offering countertop
display units that hold large numbers of these
impulse-driven items, as well as sets of containers,
and magnetic easels that can hold up to 12
assorted containers. 

Kamenstein® has also developed 12-, 16-, and 18-
tin revolving spice racks utilizing magnetic round
tins. Also available are magnetic, rectangular,
brushed stainless steel “strips” that can be hung
vertically, horizontally, or at an angle to suit any
decorating need, in 3-, 5-, 6-, 9-, and 12-tin 
spice sets.

Other innovative new products to be sold under
the Kamenstein® brand are wipe dispenser
containers and clean-up kits, which combine a
PerfectTear® paper towel holder and a wipe
dispenser container within a durable plastic
carrying case. 

The popularity of the new Twist spice racks for
2004 is reflected by the development of 15 new
designs, mirroring many of the color and material
choices being utilized in the next generation of
PerfectTear® paper towel holders. Other spice
racks of note are: the 15-jar, 18-jar, and 21-jar
Tower racks in assorted colors and finishes; a 16-
jar and 20-jar stainless steel version of the Tower;
Photo Frame spice racks; the nostalgic and novel
Ferris Wheel spice rack, and a 16-jar multi-striped
bamboo spice rack. Other exciting concepts that
will be brought to market in the beginning of 2005
are a 20-jar flat wire rack in the Chromeworks
collection, a sequel to the unusual Circa spice
rack, and the fun Spice Train. Also in 2005, the
Company will begin shipping SmartSpice™, a
combination spice rack and cookbook, with over
200 recipes all contained in a computerized,
portable, digital control module. The rack comes
with 16 premium spices in jars with easy to use sift
and pour lids. Kamenstein® bottles all of its spices
in the United States in its own FDA-approved
bottling facility in Massachusetts.

For home organization and back-to-college,
Kamenstein®  has developed a stainless steel
message board with a dry erase section, as well
as the Dorm Safe, a unique, compact, lockable
safe for personal items and valuables. These items
will be available in time for the busy back-to-

school season in the 2nd and 3rd quarters 
of 2005. 

ROSHCO®

Roshco® became a major brand in silicone
bakeware in 2004, with a broad assortment of 14
items in key colors, highlighted by the exclusive
wire carrying “sled” that simplifies the handling of
the larger silicone items. We will expand the
assortment into specialty cake pans, mini baking
and chocolate molds, and set of mini novelty
molds in trend colors for 2005. The Company has
also designed numerous fondues, multi-function
versions of the S’mores Maker™, a novel ice
cream serving set that can also be used for
various desserts and a unique, easy-to-use 
cookie press.

The Roshco® division had a huge hit in 2004 with
designs using famous Hershey’s® icons. There were
two versions of the S’mores Maker™, each using a
ceramic marshmallow-shaped S’mores burner on
a ceramic tray designed to resemble the famous
Hershey’s® Milk Chocolate bar. There was also a
Hershey’s® fondue in the shape of the Hershey’s®
Chocolate Kiss. For 2005, the Company will be
shipping specialty silicone bakeware items such
as a 6-in-one Hershey’s® Kiss mold, a 6-in-one
Hershey’s® Reese’s® Peanut Butter Cup mold, and
a 4-in-one Hershey’s® Milk Chocolate Bar mold.
There is also an 8-piece Kid’s Baking Set, with
silicone molds, cookie cutters and a mini 
rolling pin.

CASAMODA™

CasaModa™ is as our primary brand for home
entertainment items. This brand features a
collection of home entertaining items, such as the
S’mores Maker™, the Smokeless Tabletop Griller™
and ceramic serveware with candle warmers and
decorative wire stands. We are expanding the
CasaModa™ barware collection to include a
beautiful leather-covered grouping, a metallic
gold and silver series and a unique “light up” line
of products using LED technology. 

2004
11

P i è c e   d e  
t
i n  
t
i n e s
f

2004
12

t h e

f o r

t c h e n w a r e  

l e r y   a n d   k i
t y  
  F r e n c h   d e s i g n   a n d   q u a l

i e r ® c u t

  S a b a t

i

t a n c e ;
s

r é s i s
i m e l e s

 
 
LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

SABATIER®

In 2004, we acquired a license to distribute
products under the well-known Sabatier® brand.
Known for its heritage of classic French cutlery, we
have expanded the Sabatier® brand to include
French-inspired designs in dinnerware, flatware,
cutting boards, kitchen tools and gadgets. 

A key addition for 2005 will be a full line extension
of the Laguiole™ line, previously available only in
steak knives known for their remarkable sharpness,
distinctive shape and the famous “bee” insignia.
The tremendous success of the contemporary
ProSteel, a hollow handle stainless knife, has
proven that the brand has widespread appeal.
We have added two new cutlery lines under the
ProSteel umbrella; one uses soft grip Santoprene®
and the other features never needs sharpening
blades. To compliment the line extension, the
Company will also be introducing both wood and
polypropylene cutting boards with the ProSteel
handle, as well as a full line of over 30 tools,
gadgets and barbecue equipment. 

We will also be expanding the traditional wood
handle Loire line to include a new cherry wood
series, and will add a full line of Loire tools and
gadgets, bringing a French-inspired, updated
look to wood tools and cutlery for the kitchen. 

We are also introducing new patterns of Sabatier®
dinnerware and flatware. Sabatier® has proven to
be a brand with wide appeal. While respected for
its classic heritage, retailers and consumers alike
fully appreciate the updated and contemporary
designs of Sabatier® in many categories 
of housewares.

:USE® - TOOLS FOR CIVILIZATION®

Originated by the renowned designer Robert
Sonneman, :USE® is an upscale line of
contemporary bath and lighting products. Many
of the lines are carried by the finest bath and
decorative accessory retailers in America, and
are respected for their breakthrough design and
unparalleled quality. We acquired :USE® in late
2003, and have taken a two-level approach to
product development for the brand. While
continuing to expand the assortment of product in

the premier lines, we have also developed three
great collections of exciting, moderately priced,
bath, closet, and bedroom storage accessories.
We have received very positive feedback from all
channels of distribution for these storage
accessories, with particular interest from those
accounts that target the ever-expanding back-to-
dorm business. 

For 2005, we have introduced WetNets™, a
collection of popularly priced, brightly colored
bath and shower accessories, made of
waterproof nylon netting held within colorful
polypropylene frames. Oversized and extra-strong
suction cups hold the WetNets™ to any smooth
surface and make installation simple and safe.
WetNets™ will be available in many sizes, in sets,
as wall-corner units, and in over-the-shower 
rod models. 

JOSEPH ABBOUD ENVIRONMENTS™

Joseph Abboud Environments™ takes the same
casual, understated approach to elegant fashion
as Joseph Abboud does in his clothing designs. His
keen understanding of style, fabric, texture, and
color, all combine into an updated classic style
that is as flexible in its approach to dressing a
table as it is when outfitting a wardrobe. For 2004,
we offered over 50 items in the Abboud
collections of flatware, glassware, placemats,
stainless tabletop accessories, candles and
dinnerware. Both the South Beach and Ventana
collections were major successes at such upscale
retailers as Bloomingdale’s and Macy’s, and are
perfect expressions of the Abboud philosophy. By
utilizing unique combinations of shapes, textures,
and materials featuring a metallic “reactive
glaze” on the dinnerware that imparts a
remarkable visual depth to the product, the
Abboud collections create a fluid approach that
is effective for the entire range of casual to 
formal entertaining. 

We also design and distribute the Kathy Ireland
Home® Acafe collections of dinnerware, oven to
table ceramics, and wooden serveware. The
designs and colors reflect elegant, updated taste
at affordable prices. In 2004, we launched 18
items in dinnerware, both in full sets and open

2004
13

stock, in fashion color combinations of terra cotta
and mustard, blue and mustard, and brick and
mustard. We also introduced 32 oven-to-table
items, using the same color combinations, and
highlighted by individual accent pieces such as
large platters or ramekins done in solid colors. As
with all fine ceramics, the Acafe collection is
freezer, oven, microwave and dishwasher safe.
The wood serveware collection features honey
toned wood combined with rich, dark brown
scrolled metal accents, and includes a salad
bowl set, wine rack, coasters, bread basket, and
serving tray. 

2004
14

LIFETIME HOAN CORPORATION

  J o s e p h   A b b o u d
r o o m
  u p   a n y  
i g h t

s

l

i v e   e n e r g y   s o u r c e ;
s ™   c o l
r o n m e n t

l e c t

i o n  

t e r n a t
A l
E n v i

2004
15

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK 
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The Company’s Common Stock has been traded
under the symbol “LCUT” on The NASDAQ National

Market (“NASDAQ”) since its initial public offering in
June 1991.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock of the Company for the
fiscal periods indicated as reported by NASDAQ.

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2004 

2003   

High 
$17.65 
$22.79 
$22.98 
$15.90

Low 
$13.41
$17.78
$14.85
$11.74 

High 
$7.10 
$7.93 
$10.50
$17.12 

Low
$4.68    
$6.30        
$6.43        
$9.84        

The Company estimates that at December 31,
2004, there were approximately 2,000 beneficial
holders of the Common Stock of the Company.

The Company is authorized to issue 2,000,000
shares of Series B Preferred Stock, par value of
One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of which is
outstanding.  The Company is also authorized to
issue 100 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par
value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of which 
is outstanding.

The Company paid quarterly cash dividends of
$0.0625 per share, or a total annual cash
dividend of $0.25 per share, on its Common Stock
during each of 2004 and 2003.  The Board of
Directors currently intends to continue to pay
quarterly cash dividends of $0.0625 per share of
Common Stock for the foreseeable future,
although the Board may in its discretion determine
to modify or eliminate such dividends at any time.

The following table summarizes the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004:

Plan category  

Number of securities to 
be issued upon 
exercise of outstanding   
options 

Weighted average  
exercise price of  
outstanding options  

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under 
equity compensation
plans (excluding 
securities reflected in
column (a))

(a) 

(b) 

(c)  

Equity compensation
plans approved by  
security holders 

Equity compensation
plans not approved by  
security holders

Total   

694,807 

$7.59 

949,500 

— 

694,807   

—

$7.59  

— 

949,500

2004
16

(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,   

2004 

2003

2002 

2001 

2000  

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

Net sales
Cost of sales
Distribution expenses 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 
Income from operations 
Interest expense 
Other income, net 

$189,458
111,497
22,830
40,282
14,849
835
(60)

$160,355
92,918
21,030
31,762
14,645
724
(68)

$131,219
73,145
22,255
28,923
6,896
1,004
(66)

$135,068
75,626
22,037
30,427
6,978
1,015
(98)

Income before income taxes 
Income taxes 
Income from continuing operations 

14,074
5,602
$8,472

13,989
5,574
$8,415

5,958
2,407
$3,551

6,061
2,449
$3,612

$121,124 
70,189
16,555
26,882

7,498  
730  
(82)

6,850  
2,786  
$4,064  

Basic earnings per common share from 

continuing operations

Weighted average shares – basic  

Diluted earnings per common share from 

continuing operations

Weighted average shares and common 

share equivalents – diluted 

$0.77
10,982

$0.79
10,628

$0.34
10,516

$0.34
10,492

$0.37  

10,995

$0.75

$0.78

$0.34

$0.34

$0.37   

11,226

10,754

10,541

10,537

11,079

Cash dividends paid per common share 

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:       

Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Working capital 
Total assets 
Short-term borrowings 
Long-term debt
Stockholders’ equity 

December 31, 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

$102,543 
52,913
49,630 
156,335 
19,400 
5,000 
92,938 

$88,284 
46,974 
41,310 
136,736 
16,800 
- 
86,081 

$66,189 
32,809 
33,380 
113,369 
14,200 
- 
78,309 

$75,486 
44,925 
30,561 
124,856 
22,847 
- 
78,061 

$73,280  
34,074  
39,206  
113,307  
10,746

-    

77,517  

Effective September 2002, the Company sold its
51% controlling interest in Prestige Italiana, Spa
(“Prestige Italy”), and, together with its minority
interest shareholder, caused Prestige
Haushaltwaren GmbH (“Prestige Germany”, and
together with Prestige Italy, the “Prestige
Companies”) to sell all of its receivables and
inventory to a European housewares distributor.
The results of operations of the Prestige
Companies through the date of disposal are

reflected as discontinued operations and are
therefore excluded from the selected
consolidated income statement data 
presented above.

Certain selling, general and administrative
expenses have been reclassified to distribution
expenses in 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 to
conform with the current year’s presentation.

2004
17

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK 
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The Company’s Common Stock has been traded
under the symbol “LCUT” on The NASDAQ National

Market (“NASDAQ”) since its initial public offering in
June 1991.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock of the Company for the
fiscal periods indicated as reported by NASDAQ.

First Quarter 
Second Quarter 
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2004 

2003   

High 
$17.65 
$22.79 
$22.98 
$15.90

Low 
$13.41
$17.78
$14.85
$11.74 

High 
$7.10 
$7.93 
$10.50
$17.12 

Low
$4.68    
$6.30        
$6.43        
$9.84        

The Company estimates that at December 31,
2004, there were approximately 2,000 beneficial
holders of the Common Stock of the Company.

The Company is authorized to issue 2,000,000
shares of Series B Preferred Stock, par value of
One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of which is
outstanding.  The Company is also authorized to
issue 100 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par
value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of which 
is outstanding.

The Company paid quarterly cash dividends of
$0.0625 per share, or a total annual cash
dividend of $0.25 per share, on its Common Stock
during each of 2004 and 2003.  The Board of
Directors currently intends to continue to pay
quarterly cash dividends of $0.0625 per share of
Common Stock for the foreseeable future,
although the Board may in its discretion determine
to modify or eliminate such dividends at any time.

The following table summarizes the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004:

Plan category  

Number of securities to 
be issued upon 
exercise of outstanding   
options 

Weighted average  
exercise price of  
outstanding options  

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under 
equity compensation
plans (excluding 
securities reflected in
column (a))

(a) 

(b) 

(c)  

Equity compensation
plans approved by  
security holders 

Equity compensation
plans not approved by  
security holders

Total   

694,807 

$7.59 

949,500 

— 

694,807   

—

$7.59  

— 

949,500

2004
16

(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,   

2004 

2003

2002 

2001 

2000  

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

Net sales
Cost of sales
Distribution expenses 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 
Income from operations 
Interest expense 
Other income, net 

$189,458
111,497
22,830
40,282
14,849
835
(60)

$160,355
92,918
21,030
31,762
14,645
724
(68)

$131,219
73,145
22,255
28,923
6,896
1,004
(66)

$135,068
75,626
22,037
30,427
6,978
1,015
(98)

Income before income taxes 
Income taxes 
Income from continuing operations 

14,074
5,602
$8,472

13,989
5,574
$8,415

5,958
2,407
$3,551

6,061
2,449
$3,612

$121,124 
70,189
16,555
26,882

7,498  
730  
(82)

6,850  
2,786  
$4,064  

Basic earnings per common share from 

continuing operations

Weighted average shares – basic  

Diluted earnings per common share from 

continuing operations

Weighted average shares and common 

share equivalents – diluted 

$0.77
10,982

$0.79
10,628

$0.34
10,516

$0.34
10,492

$0.37  

10,995

$0.75

$0.78

$0.34

$0.34

$0.37   

11,226

10,754

10,541

10,537

11,079

Cash dividends paid per common share 

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25

$0.25 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:       

Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Working capital 
Total assets 
Short-term borrowings 
Long-term debt
Stockholders’ equity 

December 31, 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

$102,543 
52,913
49,630 
156,335 
19,400 
5,000 
92,938 

$88,284 
46,974 
41,310 
136,736 
16,800 
- 
86,081 

$66,189 
32,809 
33,380 
113,369 
14,200 
- 
78,309 

$75,486 
44,925 
30,561 
124,856 
22,847 
- 
78,061 

$73,280  
34,074  
39,206  
113,307  
10,746

-    

77,517  

Effective September 2002, the Company sold its
51% controlling interest in Prestige Italiana, Spa
(“Prestige Italy”), and, together with its minority
interest shareholder, caused Prestige
Haushaltwaren GmbH (“Prestige Germany”, and
together with Prestige Italy, the “Prestige
Companies”) to sell all of its receivables and
inventory to a European housewares distributor.
The results of operations of the Prestige
Companies through the date of disposal are

reflected as discontinued operations and are
therefore excluded from the selected
consolidated income statement data 
presented above.

Certain selling, general and administrative
expenses have been reclassified to distribution
expenses in 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 to
conform with the current year’s presentation.

2004
17

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements for the Company and notes thereto
included elsewhere herein.  

OVERVIEW

The Company is a leading designer, developer
and marketer of a broad range of branded
consumer products used in the home, including
Kitchenware, Cutlery and Cutting Boards,
Bakeware and Cookware, Pantryware and Spices,
Tabletop and Bath Accessories.  Products are
marketed under brand names including
Farberware®, KitchenAid®, Cuisinart®, Hoffritz®,
Sabatier®, DBK™-Daniel Boulud Kitchen, Joseph
Abboud Environments™, Roshco®, Baker’s
Advantage®, Kamenstein®, CasaModa™, Hoan®,
Gemco® and :USE®.  The Company uses the
Farberware® brand name for kitchenware, cutlery
and cutting boards and bakeware pursuant to a
200-year royalty-free license. The Company
licenses the KitchenAid®, Cuisinart®, Farberware®
(for flatware and dinnerware), Sabatier®, DBK™-
Daniel Boulud Kitchen and Joseph Abboud
Environments™ trade names pursuant to licenses
granted by the owners of those brands. All other
brand names listed above are owned.  Several
product lines are marketed within each of the
Company’s product categories and under brands
primarily targeting moderate to medium price
points, through every major level of trade.  

Over the last several years, sales growth has come
from: (i) expanding product offerings within current
categories, (ii) developing and acquiring product
categories and (iii) entering new channels of
distribution, primarily in the United States.  Key
factors in the Company’s growth strategy have
been, and will continue to be, the selective use
and management of strong brands and the ability
to provide a steady stream of new products 
and designs.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, net sales
were $189.5 million, which represented an 18.1%
growth over the previous year.  The combined net
sales in 2004 for the Gemco®, :USE® and Excel
businesses that had been acquired during the
past 15 months, were approximately $14.3 million
compared to $0.6 million in 2003.  Excluding the
impact of these acquisitions, net sales for 2004
were approximately $175.2 million, a 9.6% growth
over 2003.  The 9.6% increase in sales was
primarily attributable to the continuing growth in
demand for KitchenAid® branded products and
higher Outlet Store sales, offset by lower sales in

2004 of the Company’s S’mores Maker™.  Net
sales for the Outlet Stores in 2004 were $15.9
million compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  The
sales growth for the Outlet Stores was principally
attributable to the Company assuming
responsibility for an additional 20% of the floor
space in each store, effective October 1, 2003.   

The Company’s gross profit margin is subject to
fluctuation due primarily to product mix and, in
some instances, customer mix.  In 2004, our gross
profit margin declined as a substantial portion of
our sales growth came from sales of KitchenAid®
branded products, which generate lower margins
due to the added cost of royalties, and increased
sales of other product lines, including Gemco®
functional glassware and Excel products, that
generate lower gross profit margins.

Our operating profit margin declined in 2004 due
to three factors: (i) the $14.3 million in sales for the
recently acquired Gemco®, :USE® and Excel
businesses generated a small operating loss in
2004, (ii) the distribution of the Company’s
products through its outlet stores generated higher
sales and a larger operating loss in 2004
compared to 2003 and (iii)added personnel costs
incurred in 2004 to expand the product design
group, the overseas sourcing department and our
sales and marketing departments to
accommodate future growth.  In addition, the
Company incurred in excess of $900,000 of direct
expenses in 2004 related to Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance work.

The Company’s business and working capital
needs are highly seasonal, with a significant
majority of sales occurring in the third and fourth
quarters. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, net sales for the
third and fourth quarters combined accounted for
63%, 66% and 61% of total annual net sales,
respectively, and operating profit earned in the
third and fourth quarters combined accounted for
92%, 97% and 100% of total annual operating
profits, respectively. Inventory levels increase
primarily in the June through October time period
in anticipation of the pre-holiday shipping season. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of
these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the

2004
18

reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. On an on-going
basis, management evaluates its estimates and
judgments, including those related to inventories.
Management bases its estimates and judgments
on historical experience and on various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.  The Company’s
accounting policies are more fully described in
Note A of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company believes that the following
discussion addresses the Company’s most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are
most important to the portrayal of the Company’s
consolidated financial condition and results of
operations and require management’s most
difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

Merchandise inventories, consisting principally of
finished goods, are priced under the lower-of-cost
(first-in, first-out basis) or market method.  Reserves
for excess or obsolete inventory reflected in the
Company’s consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 are determined to
be adequate by the Company’s management;
however, there can be no assurance that these
reserves will prove to be adequate over time to
provide for ultimate losses in connection with the
Company’s inventory.  The Company’s
management periodically reviews and analyzes
inventory reserves based on a number of factors
including, but not limited to, future product
demand of items and estimated profitability 
of merchandise.

The Company is required to estimate the
collectibility of its accounts receivable. A

considerable amount of judgment is required in
assessing the ultimate realization of these
receivables including the current credit-worthiness
of each customer.  The Company maintains
allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of its customers to
make required payments. If the financial
conditions of the Company’s customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances
may be required. 

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. SFAS No. 141 requires all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
accounted for using the purchase method. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are
reviewed at least annually for impairment.
Accordingly, the Company ceased amortizing
goodwill effective January 1, 2002.  For each of
the years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, the Company completed its
assessment.  Based upon such reviews, no
impairment to the carrying value of goodwill 
was identified.  

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
SFAS 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets”.  SFAS 144 requires that a
long-lived asset shall be tested for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may not be
recoverable.  For each of the years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
Company completed its assessment.  Based upon
such reviews, no impairment to the carrying value
of any long-lived asset was identified.

The following table sets forth income statement data of the Company as a percentage of net sales for the
periods indicated below:

Net sales
Cost of sales
Distribution expenses 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 
Income from operations 
Interest expense 
Other income, net 
Income before income taxes
Income taxes 
Income from continuing operations 

Year Ended December 31,   

2004  
100.0% 
58.9  
12.0  
21.2  
7.9
0.4 
- 
7.5  
3.0 
4.5% 

2003  
100.0%
57.9  
13.1  
19.8 
9.2  
0.5  
- 
8.7  
3.5  
5.2% 

2002   
100.0%  
55.7    
17.0
22.0   
5.3   
0.8   
-
4.5   
1.8   
2.7%  

2004
19

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements for the Company and notes thereto
included elsewhere herein.  

OVERVIEW

The Company is a leading designer, developer
and marketer of a broad range of branded
consumer products used in the home, including
Kitchenware, Cutlery and Cutting Boards,
Bakeware and Cookware, Pantryware and Spices,
Tabletop and Bath Accessories.  Products are
marketed under brand names including
Farberware®, KitchenAid®, Cuisinart®, Hoffritz®,
Sabatier®, DBK™-Daniel Boulud Kitchen, Joseph
Abboud Environments™, Roshco®, Baker’s
Advantage®, Kamenstein®, CasaModa™, Hoan®,
Gemco® and :USE®.  The Company uses the
Farberware® brand name for kitchenware, cutlery
and cutting boards and bakeware pursuant to a
200-year royalty-free license. The Company
licenses the KitchenAid®, Cuisinart®, Farberware®
(for flatware and dinnerware), Sabatier®, DBK™-
Daniel Boulud Kitchen and Joseph Abboud
Environments™ trade names pursuant to licenses
granted by the owners of those brands. All other
brand names listed above are owned.  Several
product lines are marketed within each of the
Company’s product categories and under brands
primarily targeting moderate to medium price
points, through every major level of trade.  

Over the last several years, sales growth has come
from: (i) expanding product offerings within current
categories, (ii) developing and acquiring product
categories and (iii) entering new channels of
distribution, primarily in the United States.  Key
factors in the Company’s growth strategy have
been, and will continue to be, the selective use
and management of strong brands and the ability
to provide a steady stream of new products 
and designs.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, net sales
were $189.5 million, which represented an 18.1%
growth over the previous year.  The combined net
sales in 2004 for the Gemco®, :USE® and Excel
businesses that had been acquired during the
past 15 months, were approximately $14.3 million
compared to $0.6 million in 2003.  Excluding the
impact of these acquisitions, net sales for 2004
were approximately $175.2 million, a 9.6% growth
over 2003.  The 9.6% increase in sales was
primarily attributable to the continuing growth in
demand for KitchenAid® branded products and
higher Outlet Store sales, offset by lower sales in

2004 of the Company’s S’mores Maker™.  Net
sales for the Outlet Stores in 2004 were $15.9
million compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  The
sales growth for the Outlet Stores was principally
attributable to the Company assuming
responsibility for an additional 20% of the floor
space in each store, effective October 1, 2003.   

The Company’s gross profit margin is subject to
fluctuation due primarily to product mix and, in
some instances, customer mix.  In 2004, our gross
profit margin declined as a substantial portion of
our sales growth came from sales of KitchenAid®
branded products, which generate lower margins
due to the added cost of royalties, and increased
sales of other product lines, including Gemco®
functional glassware and Excel products, that
generate lower gross profit margins.

Our operating profit margin declined in 2004 due
to three factors: (i) the $14.3 million in sales for the
recently acquired Gemco®, :USE® and Excel
businesses generated a small operating loss in
2004, (ii) the distribution of the Company’s
products through its outlet stores generated higher
sales and a larger operating loss in 2004
compared to 2003 and (iii)added personnel costs
incurred in 2004 to expand the product design
group, the overseas sourcing department and our
sales and marketing departments to
accommodate future growth.  In addition, the
Company incurred in excess of $900,000 of direct
expenses in 2004 related to Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance work.

The Company’s business and working capital
needs are highly seasonal, with a significant
majority of sales occurring in the third and fourth
quarters. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, net sales for the
third and fourth quarters combined accounted for
63%, 66% and 61% of total annual net sales,
respectively, and operating profit earned in the
third and fourth quarters combined accounted for
92%, 97% and 100% of total annual operating
profits, respectively. Inventory levels increase
primarily in the June through October time period
in anticipation of the pre-holiday shipping season. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of
these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the

2004
18

reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. On an on-going
basis, management evaluates its estimates and
judgments, including those related to inventories.
Management bases its estimates and judgments
on historical experience and on various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.  The Company’s
accounting policies are more fully described in
Note A of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company believes that the following
discussion addresses the Company’s most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are
most important to the portrayal of the Company’s
consolidated financial condition and results of
operations and require management’s most
difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

Merchandise inventories, consisting principally of
finished goods, are priced under the lower-of-cost
(first-in, first-out basis) or market method.  Reserves
for excess or obsolete inventory reflected in the
Company’s consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 are determined to
be adequate by the Company’s management;
however, there can be no assurance that these
reserves will prove to be adequate over time to
provide for ultimate losses in connection with the
Company’s inventory.  The Company’s
management periodically reviews and analyzes
inventory reserves based on a number of factors
including, but not limited to, future product
demand of items and estimated profitability 
of merchandise.

The Company is required to estimate the
collectibility of its accounts receivable. A

considerable amount of judgment is required in
assessing the ultimate realization of these
receivables including the current credit-worthiness
of each customer.  The Company maintains
allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of its customers to
make required payments. If the financial
conditions of the Company’s customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances
may be required. 

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. SFAS No. 141 requires all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
accounted for using the purchase method. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are
reviewed at least annually for impairment.
Accordingly, the Company ceased amortizing
goodwill effective January 1, 2002.  For each of
the years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, the Company completed its
assessment.  Based upon such reviews, no
impairment to the carrying value of goodwill 
was identified.  

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
SFAS 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets”.  SFAS 144 requires that a
long-lived asset shall be tested for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may not be
recoverable.  For each of the years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
Company completed its assessment.  Based upon
such reviews, no impairment to the carrying value
of any long-lived asset was identified.

The following table sets forth income statement data of the Company as a percentage of net sales for the
periods indicated below:

Net sales
Cost of sales
Distribution expenses 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 
Income from operations 
Interest expense 
Other income, net 
Income before income taxes
Income taxes 
Income from continuing operations 

Year Ended December 31,   

2004  
100.0% 
58.9  
12.0  
21.2  
7.9
0.4 
- 
7.5  
3.0 
4.5% 

2003  
100.0%
57.9  
13.1  
19.8 
9.2  
0.5  
- 
8.7  
3.5  
5.2% 

2002   
100.0%  
55.7    
17.0
22.0   
5.3   
0.8   
-
4.5   
1.8   
2.7%  

2004
19

2004 COMPARED TO 2003

Net Sales

Net sales in 2004 were $189.5 million, an increase
of approximately $29.1 million, or 18.1% higher
than 2003.  The combined net sales in 2004 for
the Gemco® and :USE® businesses acquired in the
fourth quarter of 2003 and the Excel business that
was acquired in July 2004, totaled approximately
$14.3 million compared to $0.6 million in 2003.
The Outlet Stores sales were $15.9 million in 2004
compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  Excluding the
net sales attributable to the Gemco®, :USE®, and
Excel businesses and the Outlet Stores, net sales
totaled approximately $159.2 million, a 7.0%
increase over 2003’s sales of $148.7 million.  The
increase in sales was primarily attributable to
increased sales of KitchenAid® branded products
in the Company’s kitchenware, bakeware and
cutlery product lines and, to a lesser extent,
higher sales of its pantryware products.  These
sales increases in 2004 were offset primarily by
lower sales of the Company’s S’mores Maker™.
Sales of Farberware® and Cuisinart® branded
cutlery and Roshco® branded bakeware also
declined in 2004.

The Outlet Stores sales increased to $15.9 million
compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  The Outlet
Stores sales growth was principally attributable to
the Company assuming responsibility for 70% of
the space in each store, effective October 1,
2003, compared to 50% of the space in prior
periods.  The Outlet Stores had an operating loss
of $1.3 million in 2004, compared to an operating
loss of  $1.0 million in 2003.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for 2004 was $111.5 million, an
increase of approximately $18.6 million, or 20.0%
more than 2003.  Cost of sales as a percentage of
net sales increased to 58.9% in 2004 from 57.9%
in 2003, primarily as a result of higher sales of
KitchenAid® branded products which generate
lower margins due to the added costs of royalties
and an increase in sales of other products that
carry lower gross profit margins, including
Gemco® functional glassware products and 
Excel products.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses, which primarily consist of
warehousing expenses, handling costs of products
sold and freight-out expenses, were $22.8 million
for 2004 as compared to $21.0 million for 2003.
In 2003 these expenses included relocation
charges, duplicate rent and other costs
associated with the Company’s move into its
Robbinsville, New Jersey distribution facility
amounting to $0.7 million.  No such expenses
were incurred in 2004.  Excluding these moving
related costs, distribution expenses were 12.3%
higher in 2004 as compared to 2003.  However, as

a percentage of net sales, distribution expenses,
excluding the aforementioned relocation
charges, were 12.0% in 2004 as compared to
12.7% in 2003.  This improved relationship reflects
primarily the benefits of labor savings and
efficiencies generated by our main distribution
center in Robbinsville, New Jersey.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for
2004 were $40.3 million, an increase of $8.5
million, or 26.8%, from 2003.  The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to the following:  increased
Outlet Store operating expenses, resulting from the
Company being responsible for 70% of the space
and expenses of each store for the last three
months of 2003 and all of 2004 compared to 50%
of the space and expenses of each store for the
first nine months of 2003; additional operating
expenses of the :USE®, Gemco® and Excel
businesses recently acquired; the higher
personnel costs associated with planned
personnel increases in the product design group,
the overseas sourcing department and sales and
marketing  departments and expenses related to
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance work.   

Interest Expense

Interest expense for 2004 was $0.8 million, an
increase of $0.1 million or 15.3%, from 2003.  

Income Taxes

Income taxes for each of 2004 and 2003 were
$5.6 million.  Income taxes as a percentage of
income before taxes remained consistent from
year-to-year at approximately 40%.

2003 COMPARED TO 2002

Net Sales

Net sales in 2003 were $160.4 million, an increase
of approximately $29.1 million, or 22.2% higher
than 2002.  The increase in sales volume was
attributable primarily to increased shipments of
KitchenAid® branded kitchen tools and gadgets
and bakeware, the Company’s newly designed
S’mores Maker™ and Kamenstein®
pantryware products. 

The Outlet Stores sales increased to $11.0 million
compared to $10.3 million in 2002.  The Outlet
Stores became responsible for 70% of the space
and expenses in each store, effective October 1,
2003, compared to 50% of the space and
expenses in prior periods.  The Outlet Stores had
an operating loss of $1.0 million in 2003,
compared to an operating loss of  $0.1 million 
in 2002.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for 2003 was $92.9 million, an

2004
20

increase of approximately $19.8 million, or 27.0%
more than 2002.  Cost of sales as a percentage of
net sales increased to 57.9% in 2003 from 55.7%
in 2002, due primarily to higher sales of licensed
branded products which generate lower margins
due to the added costs of royalties and a higher
cost of sales-to-net sales relationship for
Kamenstein® products in 2003.   In addition, the
amount of direct import sales increased in 2003.
These sales relate to products shipped directly
from contract manufacturers to the Company’s
retail customers and therefore carry lower gross
profit margins as the pricing of such sales
recognizes that the Company does not incur any
warehousing or distribution costs.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses, which primarily consist of
warehousing expenses, handling costs of products
sold and freight-out expenses, were $21.0 million
for 2003 as compared to $22.2 million for 2002.
These expenses included relocation charges,
duplicate rent and other costs associated with the
Company’s move into its Robbinsville, New Jersey
distribution facility amounting to  $0.7 million in
2003 and $2.2 million in 2002.  Excluding these
moving related costs, distribution expenses were
1.2% higher in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to
higher depreciation expense related to capital
expenditures for the new automated warehouse
distribution system and related equipment, offset
by lower payroll costs.  As a percentage of net
sales, distribution expenses, excluding the
aforementioned relocation charges,  were 12.7%
in 2003 as compared to 15.3% in 2002.  This
improved relationship reflects the benefits of labor
savings generated by the new systems in our
Robbinsville, New Jersey distribution facility.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for
2003 were $31.8 million, an increase of $2.8
million, or 9.8%, from 2002.  The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to increased personnel
costs, including planned personnel additions in
the sales and product design departments,
increased commission expense related to the
higher sales volume and higher consulting fees.   

Interest Expense

Interest expense for 2003 was $0.7 million, a
decrease of $0.3 million, or 27.9%, from 2002.
The decrease is attributable to a decrease in the
average level of borrowings outstanding during
2003 under the Company’s secured, revolving
credit facility.

Income Taxes

Income taxes for 2003 were $5.6 million, an

increase of $3.2 million or 131.6%, from 2002.  The
increase in income taxes is directly related to the
increase in income before taxes from 2002 to
2003.  Income taxes as a percentage of income
before taxes remained consistent from year-to-
year at approximately 40%.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s principal sources of cash to fund
liquidity needs are: (i) cash provided by operating
activities and (ii) borrowings available under its
credit facility.  Its primary uses of funds consist of
capital expenditures, acquisitions, funding for
working capital increases, payments of principal
and  interest on its debt and payment of 
cash dividends.

At December 31, 2004, the Company had cash
and cash equivalents of $1.7 million, compared to
$1.2 million at December 31, 2003; working
capital was $49.6 million, compared to $41.3
million at December 31, 2003; the current ratio
was 1.94 to 1 compared to 1.88 to 1 at December
31, 2003; and borrowings increased to $24.4
million at December 31, 2004 compared to $16.8
million at December 31, 2003.  The increase in
working capital primarily resulted from an
increase in merchandise inventories offset in part
by an increase in accounts payable and trade
acceptances and accrued expenses.   

Cash provided by operating activities was
approximately $4.4 million, primarily resulting from
net income before depreciation, amortization,
provisions for losses on accounts receivable and
other non-cash charges and increased income
taxes payable offset by increased merchandise
inventories, decreased accounts payable and
trade acceptances and accrued expenses.  Cash
used in investing activities was approximately $9.9
million, which consisted of purchases of property
and equipment and the cash paid in connection
with the Excel acquisition.  Net cash provided by
financing activities was approximately $6.0
million, primarily as a result of an increase in short
and long-term borrowings and the proceeds from
the exercise of stock options, offset by cash
dividends paid. 

Capital expenditures were $2.9 million in 2004
and $2.2 million in 2003.  Total planned capital
expenditures for 2005 are estimated at $5.0
million.  These expenditures are expected to be
funded from current operations, cash and cash
equivalents and, if necessary, from borrowings
under the Company’s secured credit facility.

On July 28, 2004, the Company entered into a
$50 million five-year, secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) with a group of banks and, in
conjunction therewith, canceled its $35 million
secured, reducing revolving credit facility which
was due to mature in November 2004.  Borrowings
under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the

2004
21

2004 COMPARED TO 2003

Net Sales

Net sales in 2004 were $189.5 million, an increase
of approximately $29.1 million, or 18.1% higher
than 2003.  The combined net sales in 2004 for
the Gemco® and :USE® businesses acquired in the
fourth quarter of 2003 and the Excel business that
was acquired in July 2004, totaled approximately
$14.3 million compared to $0.6 million in 2003.
The Outlet Stores sales were $15.9 million in 2004
compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  Excluding the
net sales attributable to the Gemco®, :USE®, and
Excel businesses and the Outlet Stores, net sales
totaled approximately $159.2 million, a 7.0%
increase over 2003’s sales of $148.7 million.  The
increase in sales was primarily attributable to
increased sales of KitchenAid® branded products
in the Company’s kitchenware, bakeware and
cutlery product lines and, to a lesser extent,
higher sales of its pantryware products.  These
sales increases in 2004 were offset primarily by
lower sales of the Company’s S’mores Maker™.
Sales of Farberware® and Cuisinart® branded
cutlery and Roshco® branded bakeware also
declined in 2004.

The Outlet Stores sales increased to $15.9 million
compared to $11.0 million in 2003.  The Outlet
Stores sales growth was principally attributable to
the Company assuming responsibility for 70% of
the space in each store, effective October 1,
2003, compared to 50% of the space in prior
periods.  The Outlet Stores had an operating loss
of $1.3 million in 2004, compared to an operating
loss of  $1.0 million in 2003.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for 2004 was $111.5 million, an
increase of approximately $18.6 million, or 20.0%
more than 2003.  Cost of sales as a percentage of
net sales increased to 58.9% in 2004 from 57.9%
in 2003, primarily as a result of higher sales of
KitchenAid® branded products which generate
lower margins due to the added costs of royalties
and an increase in sales of other products that
carry lower gross profit margins, including
Gemco® functional glassware products and 
Excel products.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses, which primarily consist of
warehousing expenses, handling costs of products
sold and freight-out expenses, were $22.8 million
for 2004 as compared to $21.0 million for 2003.
In 2003 these expenses included relocation
charges, duplicate rent and other costs
associated with the Company’s move into its
Robbinsville, New Jersey distribution facility
amounting to $0.7 million.  No such expenses
were incurred in 2004.  Excluding these moving
related costs, distribution expenses were 12.3%
higher in 2004 as compared to 2003.  However, as

a percentage of net sales, distribution expenses,
excluding the aforementioned relocation
charges, were 12.0% in 2004 as compared to
12.7% in 2003.  This improved relationship reflects
primarily the benefits of labor savings and
efficiencies generated by our main distribution
center in Robbinsville, New Jersey.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for
2004 were $40.3 million, an increase of $8.5
million, or 26.8%, from 2003.  The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to the following:  increased
Outlet Store operating expenses, resulting from the
Company being responsible for 70% of the space
and expenses of each store for the last three
months of 2003 and all of 2004 compared to 50%
of the space and expenses of each store for the
first nine months of 2003; additional operating
expenses of the :USE®, Gemco® and Excel
businesses recently acquired; the higher
personnel costs associated with planned
personnel increases in the product design group,
the overseas sourcing department and sales and
marketing  departments and expenses related to
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance work.   

Interest Expense

Interest expense for 2004 was $0.8 million, an
increase of $0.1 million or 15.3%, from 2003.  

Income Taxes

Income taxes for each of 2004 and 2003 were
$5.6 million.  Income taxes as a percentage of
income before taxes remained consistent from
year-to-year at approximately 40%.

2003 COMPARED TO 2002

Net Sales

Net sales in 2003 were $160.4 million, an increase
of approximately $29.1 million, or 22.2% higher
than 2002.  The increase in sales volume was
attributable primarily to increased shipments of
KitchenAid® branded kitchen tools and gadgets
and bakeware, the Company’s newly designed
S’mores Maker™ and Kamenstein®
pantryware products. 

The Outlet Stores sales increased to $11.0 million
compared to $10.3 million in 2002.  The Outlet
Stores became responsible for 70% of the space
and expenses in each store, effective October 1,
2003, compared to 50% of the space and
expenses in prior periods.  The Outlet Stores had
an operating loss of $1.0 million in 2003,
compared to an operating loss of  $0.1 million 
in 2002.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for 2003 was $92.9 million, an

2004
20

increase of approximately $19.8 million, or 27.0%
more than 2002.  Cost of sales as a percentage of
net sales increased to 57.9% in 2003 from 55.7%
in 2002, due primarily to higher sales of licensed
branded products which generate lower margins
due to the added costs of royalties and a higher
cost of sales-to-net sales relationship for
Kamenstein® products in 2003.   In addition, the
amount of direct import sales increased in 2003.
These sales relate to products shipped directly
from contract manufacturers to the Company’s
retail customers and therefore carry lower gross
profit margins as the pricing of such sales
recognizes that the Company does not incur any
warehousing or distribution costs.

Distribution Expenses

Distribution expenses, which primarily consist of
warehousing expenses, handling costs of products
sold and freight-out expenses, were $21.0 million
for 2003 as compared to $22.2 million for 2002.
These expenses included relocation charges,
duplicate rent and other costs associated with the
Company’s move into its Robbinsville, New Jersey
distribution facility amounting to  $0.7 million in
2003 and $2.2 million in 2002.  Excluding these
moving related costs, distribution expenses were
1.2% higher in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to
higher depreciation expense related to capital
expenditures for the new automated warehouse
distribution system and related equipment, offset
by lower payroll costs.  As a percentage of net
sales, distribution expenses, excluding the
aforementioned relocation charges,  were 12.7%
in 2003 as compared to 15.3% in 2002.  This
improved relationship reflects the benefits of labor
savings generated by the new systems in our
Robbinsville, New Jersey distribution facility.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for
2003 were $31.8 million, an increase of $2.8
million, or 9.8%, from 2002.  The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily attributable to increased personnel
costs, including planned personnel additions in
the sales and product design departments,
increased commission expense related to the
higher sales volume and higher consulting fees.   

Interest Expense

Interest expense for 2003 was $0.7 million, a
decrease of $0.3 million, or 27.9%, from 2002.
The decrease is attributable to a decrease in the
average level of borrowings outstanding during
2003 under the Company’s secured, revolving
credit facility.

Income Taxes

Income taxes for 2003 were $5.6 million, an

increase of $3.2 million or 131.6%, from 2002.  The
increase in income taxes is directly related to the
increase in income before taxes from 2002 to
2003.  Income taxes as a percentage of income
before taxes remained consistent from year-to-
year at approximately 40%.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s principal sources of cash to fund
liquidity needs are: (i) cash provided by operating
activities and (ii) borrowings available under its
credit facility.  Its primary uses of funds consist of
capital expenditures, acquisitions, funding for
working capital increases, payments of principal
and  interest on its debt and payment of 
cash dividends.

At December 31, 2004, the Company had cash
and cash equivalents of $1.7 million, compared to
$1.2 million at December 31, 2003; working
capital was $49.6 million, compared to $41.3
million at December 31, 2003; the current ratio
was 1.94 to 1 compared to 1.88 to 1 at December
31, 2003; and borrowings increased to $24.4
million at December 31, 2004 compared to $16.8
million at December 31, 2003.  The increase in
working capital primarily resulted from an
increase in merchandise inventories offset in part
by an increase in accounts payable and trade
acceptances and accrued expenses.   

Cash provided by operating activities was
approximately $4.4 million, primarily resulting from
net income before depreciation, amortization,
provisions for losses on accounts receivable and
other non-cash charges and increased income
taxes payable offset by increased merchandise
inventories, decreased accounts payable and
trade acceptances and accrued expenses.  Cash
used in investing activities was approximately $9.9
million, which consisted of purchases of property
and equipment and the cash paid in connection
with the Excel acquisition.  Net cash provided by
financing activities was approximately $6.0
million, primarily as a result of an increase in short
and long-term borrowings and the proceeds from
the exercise of stock options, offset by cash
dividends paid. 

Capital expenditures were $2.9 million in 2004
and $2.2 million in 2003.  Total planned capital
expenditures for 2005 are estimated at $5.0
million.  These expenditures are expected to be
funded from current operations, cash and cash
equivalents and, if necessary, from borrowings
under the Company’s secured credit facility.

On July 28, 2004, the Company entered into a
$50 million five-year, secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) with a group of banks and, in
conjunction therewith, canceled its $35 million
secured, reducing revolving credit facility which
was due to mature in November 2004.  Borrowings
under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the

2004
21

assets of the Company.  Under the terms of the
Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy
certain financial covenants, including limitations
on indebtedness and sale of assets; a minimum
fixed charge ratio; a maximum leverage ratio and
maintenance of a minimum net worth.  Borrowings
under the credit facility have different interest rate
options that are based on an alternate base rate,
the LIBOR rate and the lender’s cost of funds rate,
plus in each case a margin based on a leverage
ratio.  As of December 31, 2004, the Company
had outstanding $0.4 million of letters of credit
and trade acceptances, $19.4 million of short-
term borrowings and a $5.0 million term loan
under its Credit Facility and, as a result, the
availability under the Credit Facility was $25.2
million.  The $5.0 million long-term loan is non-
amortizing, bears interest at 5.07% and matures in
August 2009.  Interest rates on short-term
borrowings at December 31, 2004 ranged from
3.3125% to 5.25%.  

Products are sold to retailers primarily on 30-day

credit terms, and to distributors primarily on 60-
day credit terms. 

The Company believes that its cash and cash
equivalents plus internally generated funds and its
credit arrangements will be sufficient to finance its
operations for the next twelve months.  

The results of operations of the Company for the
periods discussed have not been significantly
affected by inflation or foreign currency
fluctuations. The Company negotiates all of its
purchase orders with its foreign manufacturers in
United States dollars. Thus, notwithstanding any
fluctuations in foreign currencies, the Company’s
cost for a purchase order is generally not subject
to change after the time the order is placed.
However, the weakening of the United States dollar
against local currencies could lead certain
manufacturers to increase their United States
dollar prices for products. The Company believes
it would be able to compensate for any such
price increase.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s contractual obligations were as follows:

Contractual Obligations 
Total  
Operating Leases
$40,194 
Capitalized Leases
1,204 
Short-term Debt 
19,400 
5,000
Long-term Debt
Royalty License Agreements 11,103 
5,312 
Employment Agreements 
$82,213
Totals 

(in thousands)
Payments Due by Period 

Less Than  
1 Year
$5,941 
331 
19,400 
- 
3,618 
3,157 
$32,447

1-3 Years
$8,929
581 
- 
-
7,439 
2,155
$19,104

3-5 Years 
$6,705 
292 
- 
5,000
46
-
$12,043

More Than
5 Years  
$18,619  
-  
- 
-  
-  
-  

$18,619

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may
impact the consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.  The
Company is exposed to market risk associated
with changes in interest rates.  The Company’s
revolving credit facility bears interest at variable
rates and, therefore, the Company is subject to

increases and decreases in interest expense on its
variable rate debt resulting from fluctuations in
interest rates.  There have been no changes in
interest rates that would have a material impact
on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2004.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003.

2004            

Net sales
Cost of sales
Net income 
Basic earnings per common share   
Diluted earnings per common share   

2003            

Net sales 
Cost of sales
Net (loss) income  
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
Diluted (Ioss) earnings per common share

(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended

3/31 

6/30 

9/30

12/31

$37,129 
21,689 
345 
$0.03 
$0.03 

$24,284
13,426 
(602) 
($0.06) 
($0.06) 

$33,029 
19,154 
203 
$0.02 
$0.02 

$29,950 
17,003
724 
$0.07
$0.07 

$51,241 
30,553 
2,584 
$0.23 
$0.23 

$44,068 
25,552
2,887 
$0.27 
$0.27 

$68,059
40,100
5,340
$0.48
$0.47

$62,053
36,936
5,408
$0.50 
$0.49

The  quarterly  results  of  operations  for  the  periods  ended  September  30,  2004  and  December  31,  2004
include the operations of Excel acquired in July 2004.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None. 

2004
22

2004
23

assets of the Company.  Under the terms of the
Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy
certain financial covenants, including limitations
on indebtedness and sale of assets; a minimum
fixed charge ratio; a maximum leverage ratio and
maintenance of a minimum net worth.  Borrowings
under the credit facility have different interest rate
options that are based on an alternate base rate,
the LIBOR rate and the lender’s cost of funds rate,
plus in each case a margin based on a leverage
ratio.  As of December 31, 2004, the Company
had outstanding $0.4 million of letters of credit
and trade acceptances, $19.4 million of short-
term borrowings and a $5.0 million term loan
under its Credit Facility and, as a result, the
availability under the Credit Facility was $25.2
million.  The $5.0 million long-term loan is non-
amortizing, bears interest at 5.07% and matures in
August 2009.  Interest rates on short-term
borrowings at December 31, 2004 ranged from
3.3125% to 5.25%.  

Products are sold to retailers primarily on 30-day

credit terms, and to distributors primarily on 60-
day credit terms. 

The Company believes that its cash and cash
equivalents plus internally generated funds and its
credit arrangements will be sufficient to finance its
operations for the next twelve months.  

The results of operations of the Company for the
periods discussed have not been significantly
affected by inflation or foreign currency
fluctuations. The Company negotiates all of its
purchase orders with its foreign manufacturers in
United States dollars. Thus, notwithstanding any
fluctuations in foreign currencies, the Company’s
cost for a purchase order is generally not subject
to change after the time the order is placed.
However, the weakening of the United States dollar
against local currencies could lead certain
manufacturers to increase their United States
dollar prices for products. The Company believes
it would be able to compensate for any such
price increase.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s contractual obligations were as follows:

Contractual Obligations 
Total  
Operating Leases
$40,194 
Capitalized Leases
1,204 
Short-term Debt 
19,400 
5,000
Long-term Debt
Royalty License Agreements 11,103 
5,312 
Employment Agreements 
$82,213
Totals 

(in thousands)
Payments Due by Period 

Less Than  
1 Year
$5,941 
331 
19,400 
- 
3,618 
3,157 
$32,447

1-3 Years
$8,929
581 
- 
-
7,439 
2,155
$19,104

3-5 Years 
$6,705 
292 
- 
5,000
46
-
$12,043

More Than
5 Years  
$18,619  
-  
- 
-  
-  
-  

$18,619

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may
impact the consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.  The
Company is exposed to market risk associated
with changes in interest rates.  The Company’s
revolving credit facility bears interest at variable
rates and, therefore, the Company is subject to

increases and decreases in interest expense on its
variable rate debt resulting from fluctuations in
interest rates.  There have been no changes in
interest rates that would have a material impact
on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2004.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003.

2004            

Net sales
Cost of sales
Net income 
Basic earnings per common share   
Diluted earnings per common share   

2003            

Net sales 
Cost of sales
Net (loss) income  
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
Diluted (Ioss) earnings per common share

(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended

3/31 

6/30 

9/30

12/31

$37,129 
21,689 
345 
$0.03 
$0.03 

$24,284
13,426 
(602) 
($0.06) 
($0.06) 

$33,029 
19,154 
203 
$0.02 
$0.02 

$29,950 
17,003
724 
$0.07
$0.07 

$51,241 
30,553 
2,584 
$0.23 
$0.23 

$44,068 
25,552
2,887 
$0.27 
$0.27 

$68,059
40,100
5,340
$0.48
$0.47

$62,053
36,936
5,408
$0.50 
$0.49

The  quarterly  results  of  operations  for  the  periods  ended  September  30,  2004  and  December  31,  2004
include the operations of Excel acquired in July 2004.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None. 

2004
22

2004
23

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Lifetime Hoan Corporation

The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”) or Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
or the Exchange Act.  This term refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2004.  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and
CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December
31, 2004.  During the quarter ended on December 31, 2004, there was no change in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 using the criteria set forth
in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December
31, 2004, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.  

During this process the Company identified control opportunities, none of which constituted a material
weakness, and implemented a process to investigate and, as appropriate, remediate such matters.  The
Company is continuing to review, evaluate, document and test our internal control and procedures and
may identify areas where disclosure and additional corrective measures are advisable or required.  The
Company will also look for methods to improve its overall system of controls.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm who also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Ernst & Young LLP’s
attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
appears on page 26.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lifetime Hoan Corporation and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2004.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Lifetime Hoan Corporation at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 11,
2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Melville, New York

March 11, 2005

2004
24

2004
25

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Lifetime Hoan Corporation

The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”) or Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
or the Exchange Act.  This term refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2004.  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and
CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December
31, 2004.  During the quarter ended on December 31, 2004, there was no change in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 using the criteria set forth
in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December
31, 2004, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.  

During this process the Company identified control opportunities, none of which constituted a material
weakness, and implemented a process to investigate and, as appropriate, remediate such matters.  The
Company is continuing to review, evaluate, document and test our internal control and procedures and
may identify areas where disclosure and additional corrective measures are advisable or required.  The
Company will also look for methods to improve its overall system of controls.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm who also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Ernst & Young LLP’s
attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
appears on page 26.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lifetime Hoan Corporation and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2004.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Lifetime Hoan Corporation at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 11,
2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Melville, New York

March 11, 2005

2004
24

2004
25

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Lifetime Hoan Corporation

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report by Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Lifetime Hoan Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment
and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit. 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
the COSO criteria.  Also, in our opinion, Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lifetime Hoan Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated
March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ASSETS 

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents  
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $3,477 in 2004

and $3,349 in 2003   

Merchandise inventories 
Prepaid expenses
Other current assets 

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 
GOODWILL
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net 
OTHER ASSETS

TOTAL ASSETS 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Short-term borrowings 
Accounts payable and trade acceptances 
Accrued expenses 
Income taxes payable 

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 

DEFERRED RENT & OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES 
LONG-TERM DEBT

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY             

Common stock, $.01 par value, shares authorized: 25,000,000; shares

issued and outstanding: 11,050,349 in 2004 and 10,842,540 in 2003 

Paid-in capital 
Retained earnings 
Notes receivable for shares issued to stockholders 

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

(in thousands, except share data)
December 31, 

2004  

2003  

$1,741 

$1,175

34,083
58,934
1,998 
5,787 
102,543  

20,003  
16,200
15,284
2,305
$156,335 

$19,400   
7,892 
20,145 
5,476 
52,913  

2,072  
3,412 
5,000 

111  
65,229  
28,077 
(479) 
92,938  

31,977
49,294
2,129
3,709 
88,284

20,563
16,145
9,530
2,214
$136,736

$16,800
8,405
17,156
4,613
46,974

1,593
2,088
-

109
63,409
23,042
(479)
86,081

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

$156,335  

$136,736

Melville, New York

March 11, 2005

2004
26

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
27

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Lifetime Hoan Corporation

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report by Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Lifetime Hoan Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment
and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit. 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
the COSO criteria.  Also, in our opinion, Lifetime Hoan Corporation maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lifetime Hoan Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated
March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ASSETS 

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents  
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $3,477 in 2004

and $3,349 in 2003   

Merchandise inventories 
Prepaid expenses
Other current assets 

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 
GOODWILL
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net 
OTHER ASSETS

TOTAL ASSETS 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Short-term borrowings 
Accounts payable and trade acceptances 
Accrued expenses 
Income taxes payable 

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 

DEFERRED RENT & OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES 
LONG-TERM DEBT

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY             

Common stock, $.01 par value, shares authorized: 25,000,000; shares

issued and outstanding: 11,050,349 in 2004 and 10,842,540 in 2003 

Paid-in capital 
Retained earnings 
Notes receivable for shares issued to stockholders 

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

(in thousands, except share data)
December 31, 

2004  

2003  

$1,741 

$1,175

34,083
58,934
1,998 
5,787 
102,543  

20,003  
16,200
15,284
2,305
$156,335 

$19,400   
7,892 
20,145 
5,476 
52,913  

2,072  
3,412 
5,000 

111  
65,229  
28,077 
(479) 
92,938  

31,977
49,294
2,129
3,709 
88,284

20,563
16,145
9,530
2,214
$136,736

$16,800
8,405
17,156
4,613
46,974

1,593
2,088
-

109
63,409
23,042
(479)
86,081

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

$156,335  

$136,736

Melville, New York

March 11, 2005

2004
26

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
27

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,    

2004  

2003  

2002         

(in thousands)

Common Stock 
Amount  

Shares 

Paid-in 
Capital  

Retained 
Earnings    

Notes 
Receivable  
From  
Stockholders  

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)  

Total

Comprehensive
Income   

Net Sales
Cost of Sales
Distribution Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Income from Operations
Interest Expense
Other Income, net
Income Before Income Taxes
Income Taxes
Income from Continuing Operations
Discontinued Operations:         

Loss from Operations, net of tax
Loss on Disposal, net of income tax benefit of $225

Total Loss from Discontinued Operations

NET INCOME

BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
BASIC INCOME  PER COMMON SHARE 
DILUTED INCOME  PER COMMON SHARE 

$189,458  $160,355   $131,219
73,145
22,255
28,923
6,896
1,004
(66)
5,958
2,407 
3,551

111,497  
22,830 
40,282 
14,849 
835 
(60) 
14,074
5,602 
8,472 

92,918  
21,030  
31,762  
14,645    
724  
(68)  
13,989 
5,574  
8,415  

- 
- 
-

-  
- 
- 

(495)
(811)
(1,306)

$8,472 

$8,415  

$2,245

$0.77
$0.75 
- 
$0.77 
$0.75 

$0.79  
$0.78 
-
$0.79 
$0.78 

$0.34      
$0.34
($0.13)      
$0.21      
$0.21

Balance at December 31, 2001 

10,491  $105  $61,087  $17,660 

($486) 

($305) 

$78,061

Net income for 2002    
Exercise of stock options 
Repayment of notes receivable    
Foreign currency translation 

adjustment      

Comprehensive income         
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2002

Net income for 2003    
Tax Benefit on Exercise of Stock 

Options   

Exercise of stock options 
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2003 

Net income for 2004   
Tax Benefit on Exercise of 

Stock Options   

Exercise of stock options
Dividends declared    
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2004 

2,245   

2,245  $2,245

70 

1 

318    

7  

319
7

305 

305 

305
$2,550 

(479) 

- 

(479)

-

10,561  106  61,405 

282 

3 

302    
1,702    

10,843  109  63,409

207

2 

449    
1,371    

(2,628)   
17,277 

8,415   

(2,650)   
23,042

8,472   

(691)   
(2,746)   

11,050  $111  $65,229  $28,077 

($479) 

- 

(2,628)
78,309

8,415

302
1,705
(2,650)
86,081

8,472

449
1,373
(691)
(2,746)  
$92,938

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
28

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2004
29

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,    

2004  

2003  

2002         

(in thousands)

Common Stock 
Amount  

Shares 

Paid-in 
Capital  

Retained 
Earnings    

Notes 
Receivable  
From  
Stockholders  

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)  

Total

Comprehensive
Income   

Net Sales
Cost of Sales
Distribution Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Income from Operations
Interest Expense
Other Income, net
Income Before Income Taxes
Income Taxes
Income from Continuing Operations
Discontinued Operations:         

Loss from Operations, net of tax
Loss on Disposal, net of income tax benefit of $225

Total Loss from Discontinued Operations

NET INCOME

BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
BASIC INCOME  PER COMMON SHARE 
DILUTED INCOME  PER COMMON SHARE 

$189,458  $160,355   $131,219
73,145
22,255
28,923
6,896
1,004
(66)
5,958
2,407 
3,551

111,497  
22,830 
40,282 
14,849 
835 
(60) 
14,074
5,602 
8,472 

92,918  
21,030  
31,762  
14,645    
724  
(68)  
13,989 
5,574  
8,415  

- 
- 
-

-  
- 
- 

(495)
(811)
(1,306)

$8,472 

$8,415  

$2,245

$0.77
$0.75 
- 
$0.77 
$0.75 

$0.79  
$0.78 
-
$0.79 
$0.78 

$0.34      
$0.34
($0.13)      
$0.21      
$0.21

Balance at December 31, 2001 

10,491  $105  $61,087  $17,660 

($486) 

($305) 

$78,061

Net income for 2002    
Exercise of stock options 
Repayment of notes receivable    
Foreign currency translation 

adjustment      

Comprehensive income         
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2002

Net income for 2003    
Tax Benefit on Exercise of Stock 

Options   

Exercise of stock options 
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2003 

Net income for 2004   
Tax Benefit on Exercise of 

Stock Options   

Exercise of stock options
Dividends declared    
Cash dividends    
Balance at December 31, 2004 

2,245   

2,245  $2,245

70 

1 

318    

7  

319
7

305 

305 

305
$2,550 

(479) 

- 

(479)

-

10,561  106  61,405 

282 

3 

302    
1,702    

10,843  109  63,409

207

2 

449    
1,371    

(2,628)   
17,277 

8,415   

(2,650)   
23,042

8,472   

(691)   
(2,746)   

11,050  $111  $65,229  $28,077 

($479) 

- 

(2,628)
78,309

8,415

302
1,705
(2,650)
86,081

8,472

449
1,373
(691)
(2,746)  
$92,938

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
28

See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2004
29

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by 

$8,472

$8,415  

$2,245

(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,   

2004  

2003  

2002  

operating activities:          

Loss on sale of discontinued operations
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
Reserve for sales returns and allowances
Minority interest

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the 

effects of the sale of the Prestige companies and the 
acquisitions of Excel, :USE® and Gemco®:       

Accounts receivable
Merchandise inventories
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets
Accounts payable, trade acceptances and accrued 

expenses
Income taxes

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property and equipment, net
Proceeds from disposition of Prestige Companies
Acquisition of Excel
Acquisitions of :USE® and Gemco®

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from (payments of) short term borrowings, net
Proceeds from long-term debt
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
Repayment of Note Receivable 
Payment of capital lease obligations 
Cash dividends paid

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

- 
4,074
(100) 
479
(68)
9,942 
- 

-  
3,673  
105 
539  
8  
9,297  
-  

(10,658)
(4,944) 
(595) 

(21,008)  
(6,960)  
177 

(3,485)
1,312
4,429

(2,911)
- 
(7,000)
-
(9,911)

2,600 
5,000
1,373
- 
(179)
(2,746)

6,048

566
1,175

8,987  
2,452  
5,685  

(2,213)  
-  
- 
(3,964)  
(6,177)  

2,600  
- 
1,705  
-  
(50) 
(2,650) 

1,113  
62  

811
3,457
133
468
386
7,453
(476)

(6,880)
1,022
1,853

(6,122)
2,463
6,813

(1,807)
985
- 
-
(822)

(8,647)  
-  

318

7  
-
(2,628)

(4,959)
5,021

$62

1,605 

(10,950)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

$1,741

$1,175 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
30

DECEMBER 31, 2004

NOTE A — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES

Organization and Business: The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Lifetime Hoan Corporation (“Lifetime”)
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively the
“Company”), Outlet Retail Stores, Inc. (“Outlets”),
Roshco®, Inc. (“Roshco®”) and M. Kamenstein®
Corp. (“Kamenstein®”), collectively, the
“Company”.   Effective September 27, 2002, the
Company sold its 51% owned and controlled
subsidiaries, Prestige Italiana, Spa (“Prestige Italy”)
and Prestige Haushaltswaren GmbH (“Prestige
Germany” and, together with Prestige Italy, the
“Prestige Companies”).  Accordingly, the
Company has classified the Prestige Companies
business as discontinued operations.  Significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. 

The Company is engaged in the design,
marketing and distribution of a broad range of
consumer products used in the home, including
kitchenware, cutlery and cutting boards,
bakeware and cookware, pantryware and spices,
tabletop and decorative bath accessories and
markets its products under a number of trade
names, some of which are licensed. The
Company sells its products primarily to retailers
throughout the United States. 

The Company also operates approximately 60
retail outlet stores in 31 states under the
Farberware® name.   Under an agreement with the
Meyer Corporation, Meyer Corporation assumed
responsibility for merchandising and for stocking
Farberware® cookware products in the stores,
receives all revenue from sales of Farberware®
cookware  and since October 31, 2003, occupies
30% of the space in each store and reimburses
the Company for 30% of the operating expenses
of the stores.   For the periods prior to October 1,
2003, Meyer was responsible for 50% of the space
in each store and 50% of the operating expenses
of the stores.

The significant accounting policies used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company are as follows:  

Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized
when goods are shipped and title of ownership
transfers to the customer.  Related freight-out costs
are included in distribution expenses and
amounted to $3.3 million, $2.7 million and $2.7
million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Distribution Expenses: Distribution expenses
primarily consist of warehousing expenses,

handling costs of products sold and freight-out.
These expenses include relocation charges,
duplicate rent and other costs associated with the
Company’s move into it’s Robbinsville, New Jersey
distribution facility, amounting to $0.7 million and
$2.2 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively.  No
such expenses were incurred in 2004.

Inventories: Merchandise inventories, consisting
principally of finished goods, are priced at the
lower-of-cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market
method.  Reserves for excess or obsolete inventory
reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are
considered adequate by the Company’s
management; however, there can be no
assurance that these reserves will prove to be
adequate over time to provide for ultimate losses
in connection with the Company’s inventory. 

Accounts Receivable: The Company is required
to estimate the collectibility of its accounts
receivable. A considerable amount of judgment is
required in assessing the ultimate realization of
these receivables including the current credit-
worthiness of each customer.  The Company
maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments. If the
financial conditions of the Company’s customers
were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. 

Property and Equipment: Property and
equipment is stated at cost.  Property and
equipment other than leasehold improvements is
being depreciated under the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Buildings and improvements are being
depreciated over 30 years and machinery,
furniture, and equipment over 3 to 10 years.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over
the term of the lease or their estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter.

Cash Equivalents: The Company considers highly
liquid instruments with a maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying
amounts of the Company’s financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and trade

2004
31

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by 

$8,472

$8,415  

$2,245

(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,   

2004  

2003  

2002  

operating activities:          

Loss on sale of discontinued operations
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
Reserve for sales returns and allowances
Minority interest

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the 

effects of the sale of the Prestige companies and the 
acquisitions of Excel, :USE® and Gemco®:       

Accounts receivable
Merchandise inventories
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets
Accounts payable, trade acceptances and accrued 

expenses
Income taxes

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property and equipment, net
Proceeds from disposition of Prestige Companies
Acquisition of Excel
Acquisitions of :USE® and Gemco®

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from (payments of) short term borrowings, net
Proceeds from long-term debt
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
Repayment of Note Receivable 
Payment of capital lease obligations 
Cash dividends paid

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

- 
4,074
(100) 
479
(68)
9,942 
- 

-  
3,673  
105 
539  
8  
9,297  
-  

(10,658)
(4,944) 
(595) 

(21,008)  
(6,960)  
177 

(3,485)
1,312
4,429

(2,911)
- 
(7,000)
-
(9,911)

2,600 
5,000
1,373
- 
(179)
(2,746)

6,048

566
1,175

8,987  
2,452  
5,685  

(2,213)  
-  
- 
(3,964)  
(6,177)  

2,600  
- 
1,705  
-  
(50) 
(2,650) 

1,113  
62  

811
3,457
133
468
386
7,453
(476)

(6,880)
1,022
1,853

(6,122)
2,463
6,813

(1,807)
985
- 
-
(822)

(8,647)  
-  

318

7  
-
(2,628)

(4,959)
5,021

$62

1,605 

(10,950)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

$1,741

$1,175 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2004
30

DECEMBER 31, 2004

NOTE A — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES

Organization and Business: The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Lifetime Hoan Corporation (“Lifetime”)
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively the
“Company”), Outlet Retail Stores, Inc. (“Outlets”),
Roshco®, Inc. (“Roshco®”) and M. Kamenstein®
Corp. (“Kamenstein®”), collectively, the
“Company”.   Effective September 27, 2002, the
Company sold its 51% owned and controlled
subsidiaries, Prestige Italiana, Spa (“Prestige Italy”)
and Prestige Haushaltswaren GmbH (“Prestige
Germany” and, together with Prestige Italy, the
“Prestige Companies”).  Accordingly, the
Company has classified the Prestige Companies
business as discontinued operations.  Significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. 

The Company is engaged in the design,
marketing and distribution of a broad range of
consumer products used in the home, including
kitchenware, cutlery and cutting boards,
bakeware and cookware, pantryware and spices,
tabletop and decorative bath accessories and
markets its products under a number of trade
names, some of which are licensed. The
Company sells its products primarily to retailers
throughout the United States. 

The Company also operates approximately 60
retail outlet stores in 31 states under the
Farberware® name.   Under an agreement with the
Meyer Corporation, Meyer Corporation assumed
responsibility for merchandising and for stocking
Farberware® cookware products in the stores,
receives all revenue from sales of Farberware®
cookware  and since October 31, 2003, occupies
30% of the space in each store and reimburses
the Company for 30% of the operating expenses
of the stores.   For the periods prior to October 1,
2003, Meyer was responsible for 50% of the space
in each store and 50% of the operating expenses
of the stores.

The significant accounting policies used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company are as follows:  

Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized
when goods are shipped and title of ownership
transfers to the customer.  Related freight-out costs
are included in distribution expenses and
amounted to $3.3 million, $2.7 million and $2.7
million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Distribution Expenses: Distribution expenses
primarily consist of warehousing expenses,

handling costs of products sold and freight-out.
These expenses include relocation charges,
duplicate rent and other costs associated with the
Company’s move into it’s Robbinsville, New Jersey
distribution facility, amounting to $0.7 million and
$2.2 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively.  No
such expenses were incurred in 2004.

Inventories: Merchandise inventories, consisting
principally of finished goods, are priced at the
lower-of-cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market
method.  Reserves for excess or obsolete inventory
reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are
considered adequate by the Company’s
management; however, there can be no
assurance that these reserves will prove to be
adequate over time to provide for ultimate losses
in connection with the Company’s inventory. 

Accounts Receivable: The Company is required
to estimate the collectibility of its accounts
receivable. A considerable amount of judgment is
required in assessing the ultimate realization of
these receivables including the current credit-
worthiness of each customer.  The Company
maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments. If the
financial conditions of the Company’s customers
were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. 

Property and Equipment: Property and
equipment is stated at cost.  Property and
equipment other than leasehold improvements is
being depreciated under the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Buildings and improvements are being
depreciated over 30 years and machinery,
furniture, and equipment over 3 to 10 years.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over
the term of the lease or their estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter.

Cash Equivalents: The Company considers highly
liquid instruments with a maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying
amounts of the Company’s financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and trade

2004
31

acceptances approximate their fair values
because of the short-term nature of these items.
The carrying value of short-term borrowings
outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit
facility approximate fair value as such borrowings
bear interest at variable market rates.  The
carrying value of long-term debt outstanding
under the Company’s revolving credit facility
approximates fair value of such debt and bears
interest at the current market rate of 5.07%.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. SFAS No. 141 requires all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
accounted for using the purchase method. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are
reviewed at least annually for impairment.  The
Company ceased amortizing goodwill effective
January 1, 2002.   The Company completed its
annual assessment of goodwill impairment in the
fourth quarters of 2004 and 2003.  Based upon
such reviews, no impairment to the carrying value
of goodwill was identified in either period.   

Other intangibles consist of licenses, trademarks /
trade names, customer relationships and product
designs acquired pursuant to four acquisitions
and are being amortized by the straight-line
method over periods ranging from 4 to 40 years.
The remaining weighted-average amortization
period for such intangibles is approximately 28
years.  Accumulated amortization at December
31, 2004 and 2003 was $3.7 million and $3.1
million, respectively.  Amortization expense with
respect to these intangible assets for each of five
succeeding fiscal years is estimated to be as
follows:  2005 - $677,000; 2006 - $677,000; 2007 -
$677,000; 2008 - $665,000; 2009 - $615,000.

Amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002 was $602,000, $410,000 and
$390,000, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets: The Company periodically
reviews the carrying value of intangibles and

other long-lived assets for recoverability or
whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that such amounts have been impaired.
Impairment indicators include, among other
conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or
anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit
and a material decrease in the fair value of some
or all of the Company’s long-lived assets. When
indicators are present, the Company compares
the carrying value of the asset to the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated from the use of the asset.  If these
estimated future cash flows are less than the
carrying value of the asset, the Company
recognizes impairment to the extent the carrying
value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Such a
review has been performed by management and
does not indicate an impairment of such assets.

Income Taxes: Income taxes have been provided
using the liability method.   Deferred income taxes
have been provided to reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes.

Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
have been computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding of 10,982,000 in 2004, 10,628,000 in
2003 and 10,516,000 in 2002.   Diluted earnings
per share have been computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding, including the dilutive
effects of stock options, of 11,226,000 in 2004,
10,754,000 in 2003 and 10,541,000 in 2002.

Accounting for Stock Option Plan: At December
31, 2004, the Company had a stock option plan,
which is more fully described in Note D.  The
Company accounts for the plan under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees”, and related Interpretations.  No
stock-based employee compensation cost is
reflected in net income, as all options granted
under those plans had an exercise price equal to
the market values of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant.

2004
32

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.
123,  ”Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation.

Year ended December 31,   
(in thousands, except per share data) 

2004 

2003

2002  

Net income, as reported 

$8,472

$8,415 

$2,245

Deduct: Total stock option employee 

compensation expense determined 
under fair value based method for all 
awards, net of related tax effects 

Pro forma net income 

(179) 

(196)

$8,293

$8,219 

(156)

$2,089

Earnings per share:     

Basic – as reported 

Basic – pro forma 

Diluted – as reported 

Diluted – pro forma 

$0.77 

$0.76 

$0.75 

$0.74 

$0.79 

$0.77 

$0.78 

$0.76 

$0.21

$0.20

$0.21

$0.20

The weighted average fair values of options
granted during the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 were $5.90, $2.57 and
$0.16, respectively.  The fair values for these
options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:  risk-free
interest rates of 3.73%, 3.37% and 3.47% for 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively; 1.55% dividend
yield in 2004, 2.53% dividend yield in 2003 and
4.33% dividend yield in 2002; volatility factor of
the expected market price of the Company’s
common stock of 0.37 in 2004, 0.41 in 2003 and
0.06 in 2002; and a weighted-average expected
life of the options of 6.0, 6.0 and 6.0 years in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options, which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable.  In addition, option
valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected
stock price volatility.  Because the Company’s
employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options,
and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair values of its employee
stock options.

New Accounting Pronouncements: In December
2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial

Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123 (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R addresses
the accounting for transactions in which an
enterprise exchanges its valuable equity
instruments for employee services. It also
addresses transactions in which an enterprise
incurs liabilities that are based on the fair values
of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may
be settled by the issuance of those equity
instruments in exchange for employee services.
For public entities, the cost of employee services
received in exchange for equity instruments,
including employee stock options, would be
measured based on the grant-date fair value of
those instruments. That cost would be recognized
as compensation expense over the requisite
service period (often the vesting period).
Generally, no compensation cost would be
recognized for equity instruments that do not vest. 

SFAS No. 123R is effective for periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R will apply to
awards granted, modified, or settled in cash on or
after that date. Companies may choose from one
of three methods when transitioning to the new
standard, which may include restatement of prior
annual and interim periods. The impact on EPS of
expensing stock options will be dependent upon
the method to be used for valuation of stock
options and the transition method determined by
the Company. The total impact on an annualized
basis could range from approximately $0.01 to
$0.02 per share-diluted, assuming option grants
continue at the same level as in 2004. 

2004
33

acceptances approximate their fair values
because of the short-term nature of these items.
The carrying value of short-term borrowings
outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit
facility approximate fair value as such borrowings
bear interest at variable market rates.  The
carrying value of long-term debt outstanding
under the Company’s revolving credit facility
approximates fair value of such debt and bears
interest at the current market rate of 5.07%.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. SFAS No. 141 requires all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
accounted for using the purchase method. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are
reviewed at least annually for impairment.  The
Company ceased amortizing goodwill effective
January 1, 2002.   The Company completed its
annual assessment of goodwill impairment in the
fourth quarters of 2004 and 2003.  Based upon
such reviews, no impairment to the carrying value
of goodwill was identified in either period.   

Other intangibles consist of licenses, trademarks /
trade names, customer relationships and product
designs acquired pursuant to four acquisitions
and are being amortized by the straight-line
method over periods ranging from 4 to 40 years.
The remaining weighted-average amortization
period for such intangibles is approximately 28
years.  Accumulated amortization at December
31, 2004 and 2003 was $3.7 million and $3.1
million, respectively.  Amortization expense with
respect to these intangible assets for each of five
succeeding fiscal years is estimated to be as
follows:  2005 - $677,000; 2006 - $677,000; 2007 -
$677,000; 2008 - $665,000; 2009 - $615,000.

Amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002 was $602,000, $410,000 and
$390,000, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets: The Company periodically
reviews the carrying value of intangibles and

other long-lived assets for recoverability or
whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that such amounts have been impaired.
Impairment indicators include, among other
conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or
anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit
and a material decrease in the fair value of some
or all of the Company’s long-lived assets. When
indicators are present, the Company compares
the carrying value of the asset to the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated from the use of the asset.  If these
estimated future cash flows are less than the
carrying value of the asset, the Company
recognizes impairment to the extent the carrying
value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Such a
review has been performed by management and
does not indicate an impairment of such assets.

Income Taxes: Income taxes have been provided
using the liability method.   Deferred income taxes
have been provided to reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes.

Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
have been computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding of 10,982,000 in 2004, 10,628,000 in
2003 and 10,516,000 in 2002.   Diluted earnings
per share have been computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding, including the dilutive
effects of stock options, of 11,226,000 in 2004,
10,754,000 in 2003 and 10,541,000 in 2002.

Accounting for Stock Option Plan: At December
31, 2004, the Company had a stock option plan,
which is more fully described in Note D.  The
Company accounts for the plan under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees”, and related Interpretations.  No
stock-based employee compensation cost is
reflected in net income, as all options granted
under those plans had an exercise price equal to
the market values of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant.

2004
32

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.
123,  ”Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation.

Year ended December 31,   
(in thousands, except per share data) 

2004 

2003

2002  

Net income, as reported 

$8,472

$8,415 

$2,245

Deduct: Total stock option employee 

compensation expense determined 
under fair value based method for all 
awards, net of related tax effects 

Pro forma net income 

(179) 

(196)

$8,293

$8,219 

(156)

$2,089

Earnings per share:     

Basic – as reported 

Basic – pro forma 

Diluted – as reported 

Diluted – pro forma 

$0.77 

$0.76 

$0.75 

$0.74 

$0.79 

$0.77 

$0.78 

$0.76 

$0.21

$0.20

$0.21

$0.20

The weighted average fair values of options
granted during the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 were $5.90, $2.57 and
$0.16, respectively.  The fair values for these
options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:  risk-free
interest rates of 3.73%, 3.37% and 3.47% for 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively; 1.55% dividend
yield in 2004, 2.53% dividend yield in 2003 and
4.33% dividend yield in 2002; volatility factor of
the expected market price of the Company’s
common stock of 0.37 in 2004, 0.41 in 2003 and
0.06 in 2002; and a weighted-average expected
life of the options of 6.0, 6.0 and 6.0 years in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options, which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable.  In addition, option
valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected
stock price volatility.  Because the Company’s
employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options,
and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair values of its employee
stock options.

New Accounting Pronouncements: In December
2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial

Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123 (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R addresses
the accounting for transactions in which an
enterprise exchanges its valuable equity
instruments for employee services. It also
addresses transactions in which an enterprise
incurs liabilities that are based on the fair values
of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may
be settled by the issuance of those equity
instruments in exchange for employee services.
For public entities, the cost of employee services
received in exchange for equity instruments,
including employee stock options, would be
measured based on the grant-date fair value of
those instruments. That cost would be recognized
as compensation expense over the requisite
service period (often the vesting period).
Generally, no compensation cost would be
recognized for equity instruments that do not vest. 

SFAS No. 123R is effective for periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R will apply to
awards granted, modified, or settled in cash on or
after that date. Companies may choose from one
of three methods when transitioning to the new
standard, which may include restatement of prior
annual and interim periods. The impact on EPS of
expensing stock options will be dependent upon
the method to be used for valuation of stock
options and the transition method determined by
the Company. The total impact on an annualized
basis could range from approximately $0.01 to
$0.02 per share-diluted, assuming option grants
continue at the same level as in 2004. 

2004
33

Reclassifications: Certain selling, general and
administrative expenses have been reclassified to
distribution expenses in 2003 and 2002 to conform
with the current presentation.

NOTE B — ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSALS
AND LICENSES

Prestige Acquisition and Disposition: In
September 1999, the Company acquired 51% of
the capital stock and controlling interest in each
of Prestige Italiana, Spa (“Prestige Italy”) and
Prestige Haushaltswaren GmbH (“Prestige
Germany” and, together with Prestige Italy, the
“Prestige Companies”).  The Company paid
approximately $1.3 million for its majority interests
in the Prestige Companies. This acquisition was
accounted for using the purchase method and
the Company recorded goodwill of $586,000.
Effective September 27, 2002, the Company sold
its 51% controlling interest in Prestige Italy and,
together with its minority interest shareholder,
caused Prestige Germany to sell all of its
receivables and inventory to a European
housewares distributor.  As a result the Company
received approximately $1.0 million in cash on
October 21, 2002.   The sale resulted in a net loss
of approximately $811,000 that includes the write-
off of goodwill of approximately $540,000.
Accordingly, the Company has classified the
Prestige Companies business as discontinued
operations.  

Gemco® Acquisition: In November 2003, the
Company acquired the assets of Gemco® Ware,
Inc. (“Gemco®”), a distributor of functional
glassware products for storing and dispensing
food and condiments.  The results of operations of
Gemco® are included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of income from the date
of acquisition.  This acquisition enabled the
Company to broaden its kitchenware product
lines to include functional glassware.

:USE® Acquisition: In October 2003, the Company
acquired the business and certain assets of the
:USE® – Tools for Civilization Division of DX Design
Express, Inc., which was a company focused on
creating contemporary lifestyle products for the
home, including decorative hardware, mirrors and
lighting for the bath, as well as decorative window
accessories.  This acquisition enabled the
Company to expand its product offering to
include bath accessories.  The results of
operations of :USE® are included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of income from the date
of acquisition. 

In connection with the Gemco® and :USE®
acquisitions, the total of the purchase prices paid
in cash, including associated expenses,
amounted to approximately $4.0 million.   In
connection with the :USE® acquisition the
Company is also required to pay minimum

contingent consideration of $300,000 ($100,000
in each of the years 2004 – 2006) based upon a
percentage of net sales of the :USE® product line
up to a maximum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 in
each of the years 2004 – 2006). The acquisitions
were accounted for under the purchase method
and, accordingly, acquired assets and liabilities
are recorded at their fair values. The allocations of
the purchase prices of the acquired businesses
resulted in the following condensed balance of
assets being acquired (in thousands):

Accounts receivable 
Merchandise Inventories 
Other intangibles
Goodwill 
Total assets acquired 

Purchase Price
Allocation
$1,131
944
940
1,248
$4,263

In July 2004, the Company acquired the business
and certain assets of Excel Importing Corp.,
(“Excel”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Mickelberry Communications Incorporated.  Excel
marketed and distributed a diversified line of high
quality cutlery, tabletop, cookware and barware
products under well-recognized premium brand
names, including Sabatier®, Farberware®,
Retroneu® Design Studio®, Joseph Abboud
Environments™, DBK™-Daniel Boulud Kitchen and
Legnoart®.  The Excel acquisition provided quality
brand names that the Company can use to
market many of its existing product lines and
added tabletop product categories to the
Company’s current product lines.  The purchase
price, subject to post closing adjustments, was
approximately $8.5 million, of which $7.0 million
was paid in cash at the closing.  The Company
has not paid the balance of $1.5 million since it
believes the total estimated post closing inventory
adjustments and certain indemnification claims
are in excess of that amount.

The Company has not yet determined either the
amount or the allocation of the purchase price for
the Excel acquisition since the calculation of post
closing adjustments has not yet been finalized.
The acquisition was accounted for under the
purchase method and, accordingly, acquired
assets and liabilities are recorded at their fair
values. Preliminary the $7.0 million of the
purchase price paid at closing has been
allocated based on management’s estimates as
follows (in thousands):

Accounts receivable 
Merchandise Inventories 
Current Liabilities
License Intangibles
Total assets acquired 

Preliminary
Purchase Price
Allocation
$1,300
4,800
(5,400)
6,300
$7,000

2004
34

KitchenAid® License Agreement: On September
24, 2000, the Company entered into a license
agreement with Whirlpool Corporation.  This
agreement allows the Company to design,
manufacture and market an extensive range of
kitchen utensils, barbecue items and pantryware
products under the KitchenAid® brand name.  On
January 1, 2002, the license agreement was
amended, expanding the covered products to
include bakeware and baking related products as
covered products.  A second amendment to the
license agreement was entered into effective
August 1, 2003, which extended the term of the
license through December 31, 2007 and further
expanded the covered products to include
kitchen cutlery. Shipments of products by the
Company under the agreement KitchenAid®
name began in the second quarter of 2001.

Cuisinart® License Agreement: On March 19,
2002, the Company entered into a license
agreement with Conair Corporation.  This
agreement allows the Company to design,
manufacture and market a wide variety of cutlery
products under the Cuisinart® brand name.
Shipments of products under the Cuisinart® name
began in the fourth quarter of 2002.  On April 8,
2004, the license agreement was amended,
expanding the covered products to include
cutting boards.

NOTE C —CREDIT FACILITIES

On July 28, 2004, the Company entered into a
$50 million five-year, secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) with a group of banks and, in
conjunction therewith, canceled its $35 million
secured, reducing revolving credit facility which
was due to mature in November 2004.  Borrowings
under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the
assets of the Company.  Under the terms of the
Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy
certain financial covenants, including limitations
on indebtedness and sale of assets; a minimum
fixed charge ratio; a maximum leverage ratio;
and maintenance of a minimum net worth.
Borrowings under the credit facility have different
interest rate options that are based on an
alternate base rate, the LIBOR rate and the
lender’s cost of funds rate, plus in each case a
margin based on a leverage ratio.  As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had
outstanding $0.4 million of letters of credit and
trade acceptances, $19.4 million of short-term
borrowings and a $5.0 million term loan under its
Credit Facility and, as a result, the availability
under the Credit Facility was $25.2 million.  The
$5.0 million long-term loan is non-amortizing,
bears interest at 5.07% and matures in August
2009.  Interest rates on short-term borrowings at
December 31, 2004 ranged from 3.3125% to
5.25%.   The weighted-average interest rate on
short-term borrowings was 3.857% and 3.502% at
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively.

The Company paid interest of approximately $0.8
million, $0.7 million and $1.0 million during the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.

NOTE D — CAPITAL STOCK

Cash Dividends: The Company paid regular
quarterly cash dividends of $0.0625 per share on
its Common Stock, or a total annual cash
dividend of $0.25 per share, in each of 2004,
2003 and 2002.  The Board of Directors currently
intends to maintain a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.0625 per share of Common Stock for the
foreseeable future, although the Board may in its
discretion determine to modify or eliminate such
dividend at any time.

Common Stock Repurchase and Retirement:
During the years ended December 31, 1999 and
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000
shares of the outstanding Common Stock in the
open market.  Through December 31, 2004,
2,128,000 shares had been repurchased for
approximately $15.2 million (none were
repurchased in 2004, 2003 and 2002).

Preferred Stock: The Company is authorized to
issue 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock,
par value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of
which is outstanding.    The Company is also
authorized to issue 100 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock, par value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none
of which is outstanding.    

Stock Option Plans: In June 2000, the
stockholders of the Company approved the 2000
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which
replaced all other Company stock option plans,
whereby options to purchase up to 1,750,000
shares of Common Stock may be granted in the
form of stock options or other equity-based
awards to directors, officers, employees,
consultants and service providers to the Company
and its affiliates.  The Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors of the Company to issue incentive stock
options as defined in Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code, stock options that do not conform
to the requirements of that Section of the Code
and other stock based awards.  Options that have
been granted under the plan expire over a range
of ten years from the date of the grant and vest
over a range of up to five years, from the date of
grant. 

As of December 31, 2004, approximately 949,500
shares were available for grant under the Plan
and all options granted through December 31,
2004 under the Plan have exercise prices equal to
the market value of the Company’s stock on the
date of grant. 

2004
35

Reclassifications: Certain selling, general and
administrative expenses have been reclassified to
distribution expenses in 2003 and 2002 to conform
with the current presentation.

NOTE B — ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSALS
AND LICENSES

Prestige Acquisition and Disposition: In
September 1999, the Company acquired 51% of
the capital stock and controlling interest in each
of Prestige Italiana, Spa (“Prestige Italy”) and
Prestige Haushaltswaren GmbH (“Prestige
Germany” and, together with Prestige Italy, the
“Prestige Companies”).  The Company paid
approximately $1.3 million for its majority interests
in the Prestige Companies. This acquisition was
accounted for using the purchase method and
the Company recorded goodwill of $586,000.
Effective September 27, 2002, the Company sold
its 51% controlling interest in Prestige Italy and,
together with its minority interest shareholder,
caused Prestige Germany to sell all of its
receivables and inventory to a European
housewares distributor.  As a result the Company
received approximately $1.0 million in cash on
October 21, 2002.   The sale resulted in a net loss
of approximately $811,000 that includes the write-
off of goodwill of approximately $540,000.
Accordingly, the Company has classified the
Prestige Companies business as discontinued
operations.  

Gemco® Acquisition: In November 2003, the
Company acquired the assets of Gemco® Ware,
Inc. (“Gemco®”), a distributor of functional
glassware products for storing and dispensing
food and condiments.  The results of operations of
Gemco® are included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of income from the date
of acquisition.  This acquisition enabled the
Company to broaden its kitchenware product
lines to include functional glassware.

:USE® Acquisition: In October 2003, the Company
acquired the business and certain assets of the
:USE® – Tools for Civilization Division of DX Design
Express, Inc., which was a company focused on
creating contemporary lifestyle products for the
home, including decorative hardware, mirrors and
lighting for the bath, as well as decorative window
accessories.  This acquisition enabled the
Company to expand its product offering to
include bath accessories.  The results of
operations of :USE® are included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of income from the date
of acquisition. 

In connection with the Gemco® and :USE®
acquisitions, the total of the purchase prices paid
in cash, including associated expenses,
amounted to approximately $4.0 million.   In
connection with the :USE® acquisition the
Company is also required to pay minimum

contingent consideration of $300,000 ($100,000
in each of the years 2004 – 2006) based upon a
percentage of net sales of the :USE® product line
up to a maximum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 in
each of the years 2004 – 2006). The acquisitions
were accounted for under the purchase method
and, accordingly, acquired assets and liabilities
are recorded at their fair values. The allocations of
the purchase prices of the acquired businesses
resulted in the following condensed balance of
assets being acquired (in thousands):

Accounts receivable 
Merchandise Inventories 
Other intangibles
Goodwill 
Total assets acquired 

Purchase Price
Allocation
$1,131
944
940
1,248
$4,263

In July 2004, the Company acquired the business
and certain assets of Excel Importing Corp.,
(“Excel”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Mickelberry Communications Incorporated.  Excel
marketed and distributed a diversified line of high
quality cutlery, tabletop, cookware and barware
products under well-recognized premium brand
names, including Sabatier®, Farberware®,
Retroneu® Design Studio®, Joseph Abboud
Environments™, DBK™-Daniel Boulud Kitchen and
Legnoart®.  The Excel acquisition provided quality
brand names that the Company can use to
market many of its existing product lines and
added tabletop product categories to the
Company’s current product lines.  The purchase
price, subject to post closing adjustments, was
approximately $8.5 million, of which $7.0 million
was paid in cash at the closing.  The Company
has not paid the balance of $1.5 million since it
believes the total estimated post closing inventory
adjustments and certain indemnification claims
are in excess of that amount.

The Company has not yet determined either the
amount or the allocation of the purchase price for
the Excel acquisition since the calculation of post
closing adjustments has not yet been finalized.
The acquisition was accounted for under the
purchase method and, accordingly, acquired
assets and liabilities are recorded at their fair
values. Preliminary the $7.0 million of the
purchase price paid at closing has been
allocated based on management’s estimates as
follows (in thousands):

Accounts receivable 
Merchandise Inventories 
Current Liabilities
License Intangibles
Total assets acquired 

Preliminary
Purchase Price
Allocation
$1,300
4,800
(5,400)
6,300
$7,000

2004
34

KitchenAid® License Agreement: On September
24, 2000, the Company entered into a license
agreement with Whirlpool Corporation.  This
agreement allows the Company to design,
manufacture and market an extensive range of
kitchen utensils, barbecue items and pantryware
products under the KitchenAid® brand name.  On
January 1, 2002, the license agreement was
amended, expanding the covered products to
include bakeware and baking related products as
covered products.  A second amendment to the
license agreement was entered into effective
August 1, 2003, which extended the term of the
license through December 31, 2007 and further
expanded the covered products to include
kitchen cutlery. Shipments of products by the
Company under the agreement KitchenAid®
name began in the second quarter of 2001.

Cuisinart® License Agreement: On March 19,
2002, the Company entered into a license
agreement with Conair Corporation.  This
agreement allows the Company to design,
manufacture and market a wide variety of cutlery
products under the Cuisinart® brand name.
Shipments of products under the Cuisinart® name
began in the fourth quarter of 2002.  On April 8,
2004, the license agreement was amended,
expanding the covered products to include
cutting boards.

NOTE C —CREDIT FACILITIES

On July 28, 2004, the Company entered into a
$50 million five-year, secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) with a group of banks and, in
conjunction therewith, canceled its $35 million
secured, reducing revolving credit facility which
was due to mature in November 2004.  Borrowings
under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the
assets of the Company.  Under the terms of the
Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy
certain financial covenants, including limitations
on indebtedness and sale of assets; a minimum
fixed charge ratio; a maximum leverage ratio;
and maintenance of a minimum net worth.
Borrowings under the credit facility have different
interest rate options that are based on an
alternate base rate, the LIBOR rate and the
lender’s cost of funds rate, plus in each case a
margin based on a leverage ratio.  As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had
outstanding $0.4 million of letters of credit and
trade acceptances, $19.4 million of short-term
borrowings and a $5.0 million term loan under its
Credit Facility and, as a result, the availability
under the Credit Facility was $25.2 million.  The
$5.0 million long-term loan is non-amortizing,
bears interest at 5.07% and matures in August
2009.  Interest rates on short-term borrowings at
December 31, 2004 ranged from 3.3125% to
5.25%.   The weighted-average interest rate on
short-term borrowings was 3.857% and 3.502% at
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively.

The Company paid interest of approximately $0.8
million, $0.7 million and $1.0 million during the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.

NOTE D — CAPITAL STOCK

Cash Dividends: The Company paid regular
quarterly cash dividends of $0.0625 per share on
its Common Stock, or a total annual cash
dividend of $0.25 per share, in each of 2004,
2003 and 2002.  The Board of Directors currently
intends to maintain a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.0625 per share of Common Stock for the
foreseeable future, although the Board may in its
discretion determine to modify or eliminate such
dividend at any time.

Common Stock Repurchase and Retirement:
During the years ended December 31, 1999 and
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000
shares of the outstanding Common Stock in the
open market.  Through December 31, 2004,
2,128,000 shares had been repurchased for
approximately $15.2 million (none were
repurchased in 2004, 2003 and 2002).

Preferred Stock: The Company is authorized to
issue 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock,
par value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none of
which is outstanding.    The Company is also
authorized to issue 100 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock, par value of One Dollar ($1.00) each, none
of which is outstanding.    

Stock Option Plans: In June 2000, the
stockholders of the Company approved the 2000
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which
replaced all other Company stock option plans,
whereby options to purchase up to 1,750,000
shares of Common Stock may be granted in the
form of stock options or other equity-based
awards to directors, officers, employees,
consultants and service providers to the Company
and its affiliates.  The Plan authorizes the Board of
Directors of the Company to issue incentive stock
options as defined in Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code, stock options that do not conform
to the requirements of that Section of the Code
and other stock based awards.  Options that have
been granted under the plan expire over a range
of ten years from the date of the grant and vest
over a range of up to five years, from the date of
grant. 

As of December 31, 2004, approximately 949,500
shares were available for grant under the Plan
and all options granted through December 31,
2004 under the Plan have exercise prices equal to
the market value of the Company’s stock on the
date of grant. 

2004
35

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

2004

2003

2002

Options

Weighted- 
Average  
Exercise
Price

Balance – Jan 1,

966,610 

$7.27  

Grants

Exercised

Canceled

49,000 

$16.68  

(217,041) 

(103,762)

$6.76 

(298,232) 

$10.60  

$7.59  

(24,449) 

966,610 

Balance–Dec 31,

694,807 

Options

919,291 

370,000 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

$6.98  

$7.37   

$6.50  

$7.44 

$7.27  

Options 

1,031,830 

175,000 

(94,153) 

(193,386) 

919,291 

Weighted-
Average 
Exercise 
Price

$6.94

$6.30

$5.00

$7.09

$6.98

The following table summarizes information about employees’ stock options outstanding at 
December 31, 2004:

Exercise 
Price  

Options
Outstanding

$4.14 - $5.51 

198,400 

$6.00 - $8.55 

413,457

$8.64 - $13.84 

$15.60 - $22.46 

58,950 

24,000

694,807 

Options 
Exercisable

198,400 

234,332 

15,200

14,000 

461,932 

Weighted-Average
Remaining 
Contractual Life

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price – 
Options Outstanding

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price –
Options Exercisable

7.2 years 

6.8 years 

8.5 years 

9.3 years 

7.1 years 

$5.28

$7.25 

$12.90

$19.65 

$7.59

$5.28

$6.97

$11.45

$20.09

$6.79

At December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were
outstanding exercisable options to purchase
699,610 and 789,917 shares of Common Stock,
respectively, at weighted-average exercise prices
per share of $6.94 and $7.14, respectively.  

In connection with the exercise of options issued
under a stock option plan that has since been
terminated, the Company received cash of
$255,968 and notes in the amount of $908,000 in
1985. The notes bear interest at 9% and are due

no later than December 31, 2005.  During 2001, a
note issued by Milton L. Cohen, a director of the
Company, in the amount of $422,000 was
canceled and replaced by a new note issued by
Milton L. Cohen in the amount of $855,000, which
consolidated such $422,000 and all other
amounts due by Milton L. Cohen to the Company.
As at December 31, 2004, the amount of such
note had been reduced to approximately
$278,000.

NOTE E — INCOME TAXES

Pre-tax income from continuing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

was $14.1 million, $14.0 million and $6.0 million,
respectively.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 
2003 

2002  

2004

Current:     

Federal

State and local

Deferred
Income tax provision

$4,861

$4,451 

$2,035

841

(100)
$5,602

1,018 

105 
$5,574 

239

133
$2,407

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial

reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):

Merchandise inventories

Accounts receivable allowances

Depreciation and amortization

Inventory reserve

Accrued bonuses

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets

December 31,   

2004 

2003         

$1,174

$1,122

964 

876

(3,412) 

(2,088)

889 

395

$10 

-  

-  

($90)

The provisions for income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the applicable federal
statutory rates as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,   
2003 

2002  

2004

2004
36

Provision for Federal income taxes at 

the statutory rate

$4,926 

$4,896 

$2,026

Increases (decreases):     

State and local income taxes,

net of Federal income tax benefit

Other

547 

129 

662 

16 

158

223

Provision for income taxes

$5,602

$5,574 

$2,407

The Company paid income taxes of
approximately $4.2 million and $3.1 million during
the years ended 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company received income tax refunds (net of
payments) of approximately $328,000 during the
year ended December 2002. 

The Company and its subsidiaries’ income tax
returns are routinely examined by various tax
authorities.  In management’s opinion, adequate
provision for income taxes has been made for all
open years in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
“Accounting for Contingencies”.

2004
37

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

2004

2003

2002

Options

Weighted- 
Average  
Exercise
Price

Balance – Jan 1,

966,610 

$7.27  

Grants

Exercised

Canceled

49,000 

$16.68  

(217,041) 

(103,762)

$6.76 

(298,232) 

$10.60  

$7.59  

(24,449) 

966,610 

Balance–Dec 31,

694,807 

Options

919,291 

370,000 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

$6.98  

$7.37   

$6.50  

$7.44 

$7.27  

Options 

1,031,830 

175,000 

(94,153) 

(193,386) 

919,291 

Weighted-
Average 
Exercise 
Price

$6.94

$6.30

$5.00

$7.09

$6.98

The following table summarizes information about employees’ stock options outstanding at 
December 31, 2004:

Exercise 
Price  

Options
Outstanding

$4.14 - $5.51 

198,400 

$6.00 - $8.55 

413,457

$8.64 - $13.84 

$15.60 - $22.46 

58,950 

24,000

694,807 

Options 
Exercisable

198,400 

234,332 

15,200

14,000 

461,932 

Weighted-Average
Remaining 
Contractual Life

Weighted-Average 
Exercise Price – 
Options Outstanding

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price –
Options Exercisable

7.2 years 

6.8 years 

8.5 years 

9.3 years 

7.1 years 

$5.28

$7.25 

$12.90

$19.65 

$7.59

$5.28

$6.97

$11.45

$20.09

$6.79

At December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were
outstanding exercisable options to purchase
699,610 and 789,917 shares of Common Stock,
respectively, at weighted-average exercise prices
per share of $6.94 and $7.14, respectively.  

In connection with the exercise of options issued
under a stock option plan that has since been
terminated, the Company received cash of
$255,968 and notes in the amount of $908,000 in
1985. The notes bear interest at 9% and are due

no later than December 31, 2005.  During 2001, a
note issued by Milton L. Cohen, a director of the
Company, in the amount of $422,000 was
canceled and replaced by a new note issued by
Milton L. Cohen in the amount of $855,000, which
consolidated such $422,000 and all other
amounts due by Milton L. Cohen to the Company.
As at December 31, 2004, the amount of such
note had been reduced to approximately
$278,000.

NOTE E — INCOME TAXES

Pre-tax income from continuing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

was $14.1 million, $14.0 million and $6.0 million,
respectively.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 
2003 

2002  

2004

Current:     

Federal

State and local

Deferred
Income tax provision

$4,861

$4,451 

$2,035

841

(100)
$5,602

1,018 

105 
$5,574 

239

133
$2,407

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial

reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):

Merchandise inventories

Accounts receivable allowances

Depreciation and amortization

Inventory reserve

Accrued bonuses

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets

December 31,   

2004 

2003         

$1,174

$1,122

964 

876

(3,412) 

(2,088)

889 

395

$10 

-  

-  

($90)

The provisions for income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the applicable federal
statutory rates as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,   
2003 

2002  

2004

2004
36

Provision for Federal income taxes at 

the statutory rate

$4,926 

$4,896 

$2,026

Increases (decreases):     

State and local income taxes,

net of Federal income tax benefit

Other

547 

129 

662 

16 

158

223

Provision for income taxes

$5,602

$5,574 

$2,407

The Company paid income taxes of
approximately $4.2 million and $3.1 million during
the years ended 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company received income tax refunds (net of
payments) of approximately $328,000 during the
year ended December 2002. 

The Company and its subsidiaries’ income tax
returns are routinely examined by various tax
authorities.  In management’s opinion, adequate
provision for income taxes has been made for all
open years in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
“Accounting for Contingencies”.

2004
37

NOTE F — COMMITMENTS

Year ended December 31:        

Operating Leases: The Company has lease
agreements for its distribution facility, showroom
facilities, sales offices and outlet stores which
expire through 2016. These leases provide for,
among other matters, annual base rent
escalations and additional rent for real estate
taxes and other costs.  Leases for certain retail
outlet stores provide for rent based upon a
percentage of monthly gross sales.

Future minimum payments under non-cancelable
operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31:        

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

$5,941  

4,821  

4,108  

3,607  

3,098  

Thereafter

18,619    

$40,194        

Under an agreement with the Meyer Corporation
(“Meyer”), Meyer assumed responsibility for
merchandising and for stocking Farberware®
cookware products in the outlet stores and
receives all revenue from store sales of
Farberware® cookware.  Since October 1, 2003,
Meyer has occupied 30% of the space in each
store and reimbursed the Company for 30% of the
operating expenses of the stores.   For the periods
prior to October 1, 2003, Meyer occupied 50% of
the space in each store and reimbursed the
company for 50% of the operating expenses of
the stores.  In 2004, 2003 and 2002, Meyer
Corporation reimbursed the Company
approximately $1.2 million, $1.5 million and $1.7
million, respectively, for operating expenses.  

Rental and related expenses under operating
leases were approximately $7.0 million, $6.9
million and $7.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Such amounts are prior to the Meyer
reimbursements described above.  

Capital Leases: In November 2003 the Company
entered into various capital lease arrangements
for the leasing of equipment to be utilized in its
Robbinsville, New Jersey warehouse distribution
facility.  These leases expire in 2008 and the future
minimum lease payments due under the leases as
of December 31, 2004 are as follows 
(in thousands):

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Total Minimum Lease Payments 

Less: amounts representing interest 
Present value of minimum lease 

$331

304

277

226

66

1,204

123

payments 

$1,081

The current and non-current portions of the
Company’s capital lease obligations at
December 31, 2004 of approximately $262,000
and $819,000, respectively, and at December 31,
2003 of approximately $128,000 and $586,000,
respectively, are included in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets within accrued
expenses and deferred rent and other long-term
liabilities, respectively.

Royalties: The Company has royalty license
agreements that require payments of royalties on
sales of licensed products which expire through
December 31, 2008.  Future minimum royalties
payable under these agreements are as follows
(in thousands):

Year ended December 31: 

2005

2006

2007

2008

$3,618

3,748

3,691

46

$11,103

Legal Proceedings: The Company has, from time
to time, been involved in various legal
proceedings.  The Company believes that all
current litigation is routine in nature and incidental
to the conduct of our business, and that none of
this litigation, if determined adversely to us, would
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations. 

Employment Agreements: Effective as of April 6,
2001, Mr. Jeffrey Siegel entered into a new
employment agreement with the Company that
provides that the Company will employ him as its
President and Chief Executive Officer for a term
commencing on April 6, 2001, and as its
Chairman of the Board for a term that
commenced immediately following the 2001
Annual Meeting of stockholders, and continuing
until April 6, 2006, and thereafter for additional
consecutive one year periods unless terminated
by either the Company or Mr. Siegel as provided
in the agreement.  The agreement provides for an
annual salary of $700,000 with annual increases

2004
38

based on changes in the Consumer Price Index
and for the payment each year of a bonus in an
amount equal to 3.5% of the Company’s pre-tax
income for such fiscal year, adjusted to include
amounts payable during such year to Mr. Siegel
under the employment agreement and to Milton
L. Cohen in his capacity as a consultant to the
Company and all significant non-recurring
charges deducted in determining such pre-tax
income.  During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded
annual compensation expense of approximately
$555,000, $576,000 and $323,000, respectively,
to the bonus plan.  In addition, under the terms of
the employment agreement, Mr. Siegel is entitled
to $350,000 payable at the earlier of April 5, 2006
or the occurrence of certain termination events.
The agreement also provides for, among other
things, certain standard fringe benefits, such as
disability benefits, medical insurance, life
insurance and an accountable expense
allowance. The agreement further provides that if
the Company is merged or otherwise
consolidated with any other organization or
substantially all of the assets of the Company are
sold or control of the Company has changed (the
transfer of 50% or more of the outstanding stock of
the Company) and such event is followed by: (i)
the termination of his employment, other than for
cause; (ii) the diminution of his duties or change in
his executive position; (iii) the diminution of his
compensation (other than as part of a general
reduction in the compensation of all employees);
or (iv) the relocation of his principal place of
employment to other than the New York
Metropolitan Area, the Company would be
obligated to pay to Mr. Siegel or his estate the
base salary required pursuant to the employment
agreement for the balance of the term. The
employment agreement also contains restrictive
covenants preventing Mr. Siegel from competing
with the Company for a period of five years from
the earlier of the termination of Mr. Siegel’s
employment (other than a termination by the
Company without cause) or the expiration of his
employment agreement.

During 2004 and 2003, several members of senior
management entered into employment
agreements with the Company.  The employment
agreements termination dates range from June
30, 2006 through June 30, 2007.  The agreements
provide for annual salaries and bonuses, and
certain standard fringe benefits, such as disability
benefits, medical insurance, life insurance and
auto allowances.

In March 2002, the Company awarded Mr. Jeffrey
Siegel a special bonus of $129,600.

NOTE G — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Effective April 6, 2001, Milton L. Cohen, then a
director of the Company, and the Company
entered into a 5-year consulting agreement

pursuant to which the Company is paying Milton L.
Cohen an annual consulting fee of $440,800.

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Milton L. Cohen owed the Company
approximately $278,000 and $453,000,
respectively.  Milton L. Cohen remits $48,404
quarterly in payment of interest and principal.  The
loan, which matures on March 31, 2006, is
included within other current and non-current
assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Jeffrey Siegel, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, owed the Company approximately
$344,000 for with respect to an outstanding loan
related to the exercise of stock options under a
stock option plan which has since 
been terminated.    

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Craig Phillips, a vice president of the
Company, owed the Company approximately
$135,000 for with respect to an outstanding loan
related to the exercise of stock options under a
stock option plan which has since been
terminated.

The above referenced notes receivables due from
Jeffrey Siegel and Craig Phillips totaling $479,000
are included within total stockholders’ equity in
the accompanying balance sheets at December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 

On October 1, 2002 the Company entered into a
consulting agreement with Ronald Shiftan, a
director of the Company.  The agreement was
terminated effective November 1, 2004 when Mr.
Shiftan became Vice Chairman of the Company.
Mr. Shiftan was paid compensation under the
consulting agreement at a rate of $30,000 
per month.

NOTE H — RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company maintains a defined contribution
retirement plan for eligible employees under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Participants can make voluntary contributions up
to a maximum of 15% of their respective salaries.
The Company made matching contributions to
the plan of approximately $257,000, $206,000
and $220,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.  

NOTE I — CONCENTRATION OF 
CREDIT RISK

The Company maintains cash and cash
equivalents with various financial institutions. 

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
accounts receivable are limited due to the large
number of entities comprising the Company’s

2004
39

NOTE F — COMMITMENTS

Year ended December 31:        

Operating Leases: The Company has lease
agreements for its distribution facility, showroom
facilities, sales offices and outlet stores which
expire through 2016. These leases provide for,
among other matters, annual base rent
escalations and additional rent for real estate
taxes and other costs.  Leases for certain retail
outlet stores provide for rent based upon a
percentage of monthly gross sales.

Future minimum payments under non-cancelable
operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31:        

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

$5,941  

4,821  

4,108  

3,607  

3,098  

Thereafter

18,619    

$40,194        

Under an agreement with the Meyer Corporation
(“Meyer”), Meyer assumed responsibility for
merchandising and for stocking Farberware®
cookware products in the outlet stores and
receives all revenue from store sales of
Farberware® cookware.  Since October 1, 2003,
Meyer has occupied 30% of the space in each
store and reimbursed the Company for 30% of the
operating expenses of the stores.   For the periods
prior to October 1, 2003, Meyer occupied 50% of
the space in each store and reimbursed the
company for 50% of the operating expenses of
the stores.  In 2004, 2003 and 2002, Meyer
Corporation reimbursed the Company
approximately $1.2 million, $1.5 million and $1.7
million, respectively, for operating expenses.  

Rental and related expenses under operating
leases were approximately $7.0 million, $6.9
million and $7.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Such amounts are prior to the Meyer
reimbursements described above.  

Capital Leases: In November 2003 the Company
entered into various capital lease arrangements
for the leasing of equipment to be utilized in its
Robbinsville, New Jersey warehouse distribution
facility.  These leases expire in 2008 and the future
minimum lease payments due under the leases as
of December 31, 2004 are as follows 
(in thousands):

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Total Minimum Lease Payments 

Less: amounts representing interest 
Present value of minimum lease 

$331

304

277

226

66

1,204

123

payments 

$1,081

The current and non-current portions of the
Company’s capital lease obligations at
December 31, 2004 of approximately $262,000
and $819,000, respectively, and at December 31,
2003 of approximately $128,000 and $586,000,
respectively, are included in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets within accrued
expenses and deferred rent and other long-term
liabilities, respectively.

Royalties: The Company has royalty license
agreements that require payments of royalties on
sales of licensed products which expire through
December 31, 2008.  Future minimum royalties
payable under these agreements are as follows
(in thousands):

Year ended December 31: 

2005

2006

2007

2008

$3,618

3,748

3,691

46

$11,103

Legal Proceedings: The Company has, from time
to time, been involved in various legal
proceedings.  The Company believes that all
current litigation is routine in nature and incidental
to the conduct of our business, and that none of
this litigation, if determined adversely to us, would
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations. 

Employment Agreements: Effective as of April 6,
2001, Mr. Jeffrey Siegel entered into a new
employment agreement with the Company that
provides that the Company will employ him as its
President and Chief Executive Officer for a term
commencing on April 6, 2001, and as its
Chairman of the Board for a term that
commenced immediately following the 2001
Annual Meeting of stockholders, and continuing
until April 6, 2006, and thereafter for additional
consecutive one year periods unless terminated
by either the Company or Mr. Siegel as provided
in the agreement.  The agreement provides for an
annual salary of $700,000 with annual increases

2004
38

based on changes in the Consumer Price Index
and for the payment each year of a bonus in an
amount equal to 3.5% of the Company’s pre-tax
income for such fiscal year, adjusted to include
amounts payable during such year to Mr. Siegel
under the employment agreement and to Milton
L. Cohen in his capacity as a consultant to the
Company and all significant non-recurring
charges deducted in determining such pre-tax
income.  During the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded
annual compensation expense of approximately
$555,000, $576,000 and $323,000, respectively,
to the bonus plan.  In addition, under the terms of
the employment agreement, Mr. Siegel is entitled
to $350,000 payable at the earlier of April 5, 2006
or the occurrence of certain termination events.
The agreement also provides for, among other
things, certain standard fringe benefits, such as
disability benefits, medical insurance, life
insurance and an accountable expense
allowance. The agreement further provides that if
the Company is merged or otherwise
consolidated with any other organization or
substantially all of the assets of the Company are
sold or control of the Company has changed (the
transfer of 50% or more of the outstanding stock of
the Company) and such event is followed by: (i)
the termination of his employment, other than for
cause; (ii) the diminution of his duties or change in
his executive position; (iii) the diminution of his
compensation (other than as part of a general
reduction in the compensation of all employees);
or (iv) the relocation of his principal place of
employment to other than the New York
Metropolitan Area, the Company would be
obligated to pay to Mr. Siegel or his estate the
base salary required pursuant to the employment
agreement for the balance of the term. The
employment agreement also contains restrictive
covenants preventing Mr. Siegel from competing
with the Company for a period of five years from
the earlier of the termination of Mr. Siegel’s
employment (other than a termination by the
Company without cause) or the expiration of his
employment agreement.

During 2004 and 2003, several members of senior
management entered into employment
agreements with the Company.  The employment
agreements termination dates range from June
30, 2006 through June 30, 2007.  The agreements
provide for annual salaries and bonuses, and
certain standard fringe benefits, such as disability
benefits, medical insurance, life insurance and
auto allowances.

In March 2002, the Company awarded Mr. Jeffrey
Siegel a special bonus of $129,600.

NOTE G — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Effective April 6, 2001, Milton L. Cohen, then a
director of the Company, and the Company
entered into a 5-year consulting agreement

pursuant to which the Company is paying Milton L.
Cohen an annual consulting fee of $440,800.

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Milton L. Cohen owed the Company
approximately $278,000 and $453,000,
respectively.  Milton L. Cohen remits $48,404
quarterly in payment of interest and principal.  The
loan, which matures on March 31, 2006, is
included within other current and non-current
assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Jeffrey Siegel, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, owed the Company approximately
$344,000 for with respect to an outstanding loan
related to the exercise of stock options under a
stock option plan which has since 
been terminated.    

As of December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, Craig Phillips, a vice president of the
Company, owed the Company approximately
$135,000 for with respect to an outstanding loan
related to the exercise of stock options under a
stock option plan which has since been
terminated.

The above referenced notes receivables due from
Jeffrey Siegel and Craig Phillips totaling $479,000
are included within total stockholders’ equity in
the accompanying balance sheets at December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 

On October 1, 2002 the Company entered into a
consulting agreement with Ronald Shiftan, a
director of the Company.  The agreement was
terminated effective November 1, 2004 when Mr.
Shiftan became Vice Chairman of the Company.
Mr. Shiftan was paid compensation under the
consulting agreement at a rate of $30,000 
per month.

NOTE H — RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company maintains a defined contribution
retirement plan for eligible employees under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Participants can make voluntary contributions up
to a maximum of 15% of their respective salaries.
The Company made matching contributions to
the plan of approximately $257,000, $206,000
and $220,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.  

NOTE I — CONCENTRATION OF 
CREDIT RISK

The Company maintains cash and cash
equivalents with various financial institutions. 

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
accounts receivable are limited due to the large
number of entities comprising the Company’s

2004
39

customer base and their dispersion across the
United States.  The Company periodically reviews
the status of its accounts receivable and, where
considered necessary, establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts.

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (including Sam’s

Clubs) accounted for approximately 24%, 29%
and 20% of net sales, respectively.  No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of the
Company’s net sales during 2004, 2003 or 2002.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, our ten largest customers accounted
for approximately 59%, 62% and 56% of net 
sales, respectively. 

NOTE J — OTHER

Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment consist of (in thousands):

Land
Building and improvements
Machinery, furniture and equipment
Leasehold improvements

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

December 31,

2004 
$932
7,179
28,881
1,810
38,802
18,799
$20,003

2003

$932
7,135
26,451
1,637
36,155
15,592
$20,563

Depreciation and amortization expense on
property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $3.5
million, $3.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Included in machinery, furniture and equipment

and related accumulated depreciation above as
of December 31, 2004 are $1,332,000 and
$281,000, respectively, and as of December 31,
2003 are $763,000 and $76,000, respectively,
related to assets recorded under capital leases.

Accrued Expenses:

Accrued expenses consist of (in thousands):

Commissions
Accrued customer allowances and rebates
Amounts due to Meyer Corporation 
Officer and employee bonuses
Accrued health insurance
Accrued royalties
Accrued salaries, vacation and temporary 

labor billings

Other

December 31,

2004 

2003      

$887 
5,407
1,621
1,203 
—
2,249

$732
5,410
2,534  
1,504
642
966

2,075
6,703
$20,145

1,855
3,513
$17,156

Sources of Supply: The Company sources its
products from approximately 98 suppliers located
primarily in the People’s Republic of China, and to
a lesser extent in the United States, Taiwan,
Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Germany, France,
Korea, Czechoslovakia, Italy, India and Hong
Kong.  For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 our three largest suppliers provided us with
approximately 54% of the products we distributed,
as compared to 62% for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003.  This concentration of

sourcing in certain key vendors is an additional
risk to our business. Furthermore, because our
product lines cover thousands of products, many
products are produced for us by only one or two
manufacturers.  An interruption of supply from any
of these manufacturers could have an adverse
impact on our ability to fill orders on a timely
basis.  However, we believe other manufacturers
with whom we do business would be able to
increase production to fulfill our requirements. 

2004
40

OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Jeffrey Siegel
Chairman of the Board, 
President and Chief Executive Officer

Ronald Shiftan
Vice Chairman and a Director

Bruce Cohen
Executive Vice President,
President-Farberware® Outlet Stores
and a Director

Craig Phillips
Vice President-Distribution, 
Secretary and a Director

Robert McNally
Vice President-Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Evan Miller
Executive Vice President and
President-Sales Division

Robert Reichenbach
Executive Vice President and
President-Cutlery, Bakeware and
At Home Entertaining Divisions

Larry Sklute
President-Kitchenware Division

Howard Bernstein
Director

Leonard Florence
Director

Sheldon Misher

Director

Cherrie Nanninga

Director

William Westerfield

Director

Joseph Abboud Environments™ is a trademark of 
JA Apparel Corp.
Cuisinart® is a registered trademark of Conair Corporation
DBK™— Daniel Boulud Kitchen is a trademark of 
Dinex Licensing LLC
Farberware® is a registered trademark of Farberware, Inc.
Hershey’s® and Reese’s® are registered trademarks of 
Hershey Foods Corporation
Kathy Ireland Home® is a registered trademark of 
Kathy Ireland World Wide LLC
KitchenAid® is a registered trademark of Whirlpool Corporation
Sabatier® is a registered trademark of Rousselon Frères et Cie.

OFFICES

Corporate Headquarters
One Merrick Avenue
Westbury, NY  11590
(516)683-6000

Distribution Centers
12 Applegate Drive
Robbinsville, NJ  08691
(609)208-1500

363 River Street
Winchendon, MA  01475
(978)297-4010

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Corporate Counsel
Samuel B. Fortenbaugh III
New York, NY

Independent Registered 
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Melville, NY

Transfer Agent & Registrar
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10286

Form 10-K
Stockholders may obtain, without 
charge, a copy of the Company’s 
annual report on Form 10-K for the 
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed 
with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission. 
Request should be sent to:

Investor Relations
Lifetime Hoan Corporation
One Merrick Avenue
Westbury, NY  11590

Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders 
will be held at 10:30AM, Tuesday, 
June 7, 2005, at the Corporate Headquarters.

2004
41

customer base and their dispersion across the
United States.  The Company periodically reviews
the status of its accounts receivable and, where
considered necessary, establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts.

During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (including Sam’s

Clubs) accounted for approximately 24%, 29%
and 20% of net sales, respectively.  No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of the
Company’s net sales during 2004, 2003 or 2002.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, our ten largest customers accounted
for approximately 59%, 62% and 56% of net 
sales, respectively. 

NOTE J — OTHER

Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment consist of (in thousands):

Land
Building and improvements
Machinery, furniture and equipment
Leasehold improvements

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

December 31,

2004 
$932
7,179
28,881
1,810
38,802
18,799
$20,003

2003

$932
7,135
26,451
1,637
36,155
15,592
$20,563

Depreciation and amortization expense on
property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $3.5
million, $3.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Included in machinery, furniture and equipment

and related accumulated depreciation above as
of December 31, 2004 are $1,332,000 and
$281,000, respectively, and as of December 31,
2003 are $763,000 and $76,000, respectively,
related to assets recorded under capital leases.

Accrued Expenses:

Accrued expenses consist of (in thousands):

Commissions
Accrued customer allowances and rebates
Amounts due to Meyer Corporation 
Officer and employee bonuses
Accrued health insurance
Accrued royalties
Accrued salaries, vacation and temporary 

labor billings

Other

December 31,

2004 

2003      

$887 
5,407
1,621
1,203 
—
2,249

$732
5,410
2,534  
1,504
642
966

2,075
6,703
$20,145

1,855
3,513
$17,156

Sources of Supply: The Company sources its
products from approximately 98 suppliers located
primarily in the People’s Republic of China, and to
a lesser extent in the United States, Taiwan,
Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Germany, France,
Korea, Czechoslovakia, Italy, India and Hong
Kong.  For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 our three largest suppliers provided us with
approximately 54% of the products we distributed,
as compared to 62% for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003.  This concentration of

sourcing in certain key vendors is an additional
risk to our business. Furthermore, because our
product lines cover thousands of products, many
products are produced for us by only one or two
manufacturers.  An interruption of supply from any
of these manufacturers could have an adverse
impact on our ability to fill orders on a timely
basis.  However, we believe other manufacturers
with whom we do business would be able to
increase production to fulfill our requirements. 

2004
40

OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Jeffrey Siegel
Chairman of the Board, 
President and Chief Executive Officer

Ronald Shiftan
Vice Chairman and a Director

Bruce Cohen
Executive Vice President,
President-Farberware® Outlet Stores
and a Director

Craig Phillips
Vice President-Distribution, 
Secretary and a Director

Robert McNally
Vice President-Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Evan Miller
Executive Vice President and
President-Sales Division

Robert Reichenbach
Executive Vice President and
President-Cutlery, Bakeware and
At Home Entertaining Divisions

Larry Sklute
President-Kitchenware Division

Howard Bernstein
Director

Leonard Florence
Director

Sheldon Misher

Director

Cherrie Nanninga

Director

William Westerfield

Director

Joseph Abboud Environments™ is a trademark of 
JA Apparel Corp.
Cuisinart® is a registered trademark of Conair Corporation
DBK™— Daniel Boulud Kitchen is a trademark of 
Dinex Licensing LLC
Farberware® is a registered trademark of Farberware, Inc.
Hershey’s® and Reese’s® are registered trademarks of 
Hershey Foods Corporation
Kathy Ireland Home® is a registered trademark of 
Kathy Ireland World Wide LLC
KitchenAid® is a registered trademark of Whirlpool Corporation
Sabatier® is a registered trademark of Rousselon Frères et Cie.

OFFICES

Corporate Headquarters
One Merrick Avenue
Westbury, NY  11590
(516)683-6000

Distribution Centers
12 Applegate Drive
Robbinsville, NJ  08691
(609)208-1500

363 River Street
Winchendon, MA  01475
(978)297-4010

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Corporate Counsel
Samuel B. Fortenbaugh III
New York, NY

Independent Registered 
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Melville, NY

Transfer Agent & Registrar
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10286

Form 10-K
Stockholders may obtain, without 
charge, a copy of the Company’s 
annual report on Form 10-K for the 
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed 
with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission. 
Request should be sent to:

Investor Relations
Lifetime Hoan Corporation
One Merrick Avenue
Westbury, NY  11590

Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders 
will be held at 10:30AM, Tuesday, 
June 7, 2005, at the Corporate Headquarters.

2004
41

O n e   M e r r

i c k   A v e n u e ,

  W e s t b u r y ,

  N e w   Y o r k   1 1 5 9 0