2023
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
Annual Report
to Shareholders
Dear Shareholders,
2023 Annual Letter to Shareholders
2023 was a pivotal year for Lincoln as we began repositioning the company for sustainable, long-term growth, and we have entered 2024
in a much stronger position. As we look ahead, we will build on the solid foundation of our at-scale retail and workplace solutions
businesses to execute on our strategy to restore value. We see a substantial opportunity to transform the company into one characterized
by foundational capital, more stable cash flows, and higher risk-adjusted returns. To support this vision, we will leverage our unique
competitive advantages as a market leader in each of our businesses, including our powerful distribution franchise, product manufacturing
capabilities, and customer-centric service model, to deliver targeted growth.
In 2023, we took swift action to advance our key enterprise initiatives, which included:
•
•
•
•
strengthening our balance sheet;
driving organic growth while shifting our sales focus to more capital-efficient products with higher risk-adjusted returns;
improving our earnings diversification by increasing our Group Protection margin; and
building a leadership team focused on executing to drive profitable growth and leading the organization forward as we embark
on the next chapter.
Strengthening our foundation
We exceeded our year-end RBC target and increased our financial flexibility.
Our top priority in 2023 was to repair and rebuild our balance sheet, and I am pleased that we ended the year with a risk-based capital
(“RBC”) ratio of 407%, a 30-point increase in RBC from year-end 2022 and exceeding our target of 400%. In November 2023, we closed
a $28 billion reinsurance transaction with Fortitude Reinsurance Company, Ltd., which was an important driver of the improvement.
This transaction was a significant milestone for Lincoln, marking a large step forward in our efforts to de-risk and strengthen our balance
sheet, and to improve our ongoing free cash flow.
In December 2023, we entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business to Osaic Holdings, Inc. This sale is expected
to provide a capital benefit of at least $700 million upon closing, which is anticipated in the first half of 2024, with no material impact on
our earnings or ongoing free cash flow. When it is finalized, we expect a further improvement in our RBC ratio and increased financial
flexibility.
We prioritized more capital-efficient and higher risk-adjusted return new business.
During the year, we made meaningful progress across our four businesses in shifting to a more capital-efficient new business mix with
higher risk-adjusted returns, while maintaining a robust level of sales.
•
•
•
•
In Annuities, total sales for the year increased by 8 percent, with a well-balanced mix across product categories and strong
growth driven by our strategic positioning across fixed product categories and with select distribution partners.
In Life Insurance, sales declined for the year, resulting from our intentional strategic realignment as we pivoted towards
accumulation products, which are expected to deliver more stable cash flows and higher risk-adjusted returns. We will further
support this shift with enhanced go-to-market strategies, including additional product actions and expanded distribution
channels.
In Group Protection, we delivered strong top-line premium growth of more than 5% year over year. Our deep relationships
and positive customer experience enabled us to achieve strong persistency while executing on the pricing actions that are core to
our margin expansion objectives.
In Retirement Plan Services, while our 2023 results were below our expectations, we delivered our ninth consecutive year of
positive flows, surpassing $100 billion in end-of-period account balances for the first time. We are focused on actions to regain
momentum and are already seeing positive results as we head into 2024, including further growth in our core record-keeping
segment through our differentiated service model.
The actions we have taken across our businesses support our overall enterprise strategy and financial objectives. While each business is in
a different stage of transformation, our product and distribution teams are executing well.
We began repositioning Group Protection to become a more significant proportion of our business mix.
A larger and more profitable Group Protection business is a core tenet of our long-term strategy to achieve a balanced mix of earnings
from segments and products with more stable cash flows. We will continue investing in infrastructure, including technology and digital
platforms, to enhance the customer experience and further differentiate Lincoln in the marketplace. We are focused on further growing
and diversifying this business in our target market segments, emphasizing smaller employers and higher-margin products such as
supplemental health.
We maintained an investment strategy focused on a high-quality and diversified portfolio.
We have a conservatively allocated portfolio that generated strong performance despite volatile markets last year. With a long-term
investment strategy built for various economic cycles, we are well-positioned for a range of potential scenarios. As we look ahead, further
optimizing our general account strategic asset allocation will be an important area of focus.
Aligning our leadership team with our enterprise strategy
In 2023, we progressed the buildout of our leadership team following my transition to CEO in 2022. We appointed a new Chief Financial
Officer from within Lincoln, Chris Neczypor, and brought in two seasoned senior leaders: Sean Woodroffe, Chief People, Culture and
Communications Officer, and Andy Rallis, Chief Risk Officer. Our leadership team was critical to our success in 2023. Ensuring we
have the most effective leaders executing at a high level as we move our strategy forward is instrumental in shaping Lincoln's future.
Our commitment to an inclusive culture and workplace
Our people are our greatest asset as we continue to foster a culture of inclusiveness and belonging while serving our customers with
commitment and care. In 2023 we refined our corporate values, which are central to our vision of stewardship. These values are shaped
by three overarching themes: (1) we encourage each employee’s pursuit of excellence and respective commitment and contributions to
our enterprise – including ethics, passion, and accountability; (2) we are One Team Lincoln, with an unwavering focus on fostering an
inclusive, collaborative culture grounded in integrity; and (3) we focus on delivering our best for our customers and stakeholders in all that
we do. Our values are the foundation of our commitment to continually building upon an employee experience that attracts, retains, and
develops top talent.
We firmly believe that our success is intertwined with the well-being of the communities in which we operate, and our commitment to
community engagement and social impact remains steadfast.
Emphasizing strong governance
As part of our overall governance approach, our Board’s composition, skillset, experience, and diversity are important to us, and we have
been and remain committed to ongoing Board independence and refreshment.
Over the past four years, we have added four highly qualified independent directors to our Board, including one in 2023. We believe the
current depth of expertise among our directors ensures strong engagement and empowerment to work closely with our leadership team.
In addition to having diverse professional experiences and skills, we are also proud to have a Board that is 42% ethnically / racially
diverse and 42% gender diverse.
The path ahead
We demonstrated consistent progress in 2023, executing against our priorities and delivering on our commitments. I want to thank our
employees for their hard work and dedication during a year of rebuilding for our company. While we have more to do, we entered 2024
with strong momentum and confidence in our ability to drive long-term, profitable growth and strong, risk-adjusted returns across the
enterprise.
On behalf of our Board of Directors, leadership team, and employees, we thank you for your continued trust and investment. There are
many exciting opportunities ahead as we build the Lincoln of tomorrow. We look forward to updating you on our progress as we further
reposition our business to deliver increasing value to our shareholders.
Ellen G. Cooper
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language
Statements in this letter that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” beginning on page 40 and “Risk
Factors” beginning on page 20.
[This page intentionally left blank]
[This page intentionally left blank]
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023
OR
☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________.
Commission File Number 1-6028
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indiana
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
35-1140070
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Suite A305, Radnor, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)
19087
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (484) 583-1400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Title of each class
Common Stock
Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/1000th interest in a share
of 9.000% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D
Trading symbol
LNC
LNC PRD
Name of each exchange on which
registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such
files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an
emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Large Accelerated Filer
Non-accelerated Filer
☒
☐
Accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company
Emerging Growth Company
☐
☐
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any
new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that
prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the
filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation
received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the shares of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of these shares on the
New York Stock Exchange) as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $3.8 billion. Shares of
common stock held by each executive officer and director and each entity that owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded
in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of February 16, 2024, 169,668,780 shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Selected portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, scheduled for May 23, 2024, have been incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Form 10-K.
Lincoln National Corporation
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Overview
Business Segments and Other Operations
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Reinsurance
Reserves
Investments
Financial Strength Ratings
Regulatory
Human Capital Management
Available Information
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Cybersecurity
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Information About our Executive Officers
PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
[Reserved]
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Index to Exhibits
Signatures
Index to Financial Statement Schedules
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 1C.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Page
1
1
2
2
4
6
8
10
10
10
11
11
12
18
19
20
34
34
36
36
36
37
38
38
39
95
101
218
218
218
218
219
219
219
219
219
220
221
229
FS-1
PART I
The “Business” section and other parts of this Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, and containing words such
as “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects” or similar words are forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ
materially from the projected results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause such differences include, but
are not limited to, those discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in the “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” in “Part
II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) of the Form 10-K.
The consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) are presented in
“Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Item 1. Business
OVERVIEW
Lincoln National Corporation (“LNC,” which also may be referred to as “Lincoln,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a holding company that
operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. Through our business segments, we sell a wide
range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement income products and solutions. LNC was organized
under the laws of the state of Indiana in 1968. We currently maintain our principal executive offices in Radnor, Pennsylvania. “Lincoln
Financial Group” is the marketing name for LNC and its subsidiary companies.
We provide products and services and report results through four segments as follows:
Business Segments
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments
The results of Lincoln Financial Network (“LFN”) and Lincoln Financial Distributors (“LFD”), our retail and wholesale distributors,
respectively, are included in the segments for which they distribute products. LFD distributes our individual products and services,
retirement plans and corporate-owned universal life insurance and variable universal life insurance (“COLI”) and bank-owned universal
life insurance and variable universal life insurance (“BOLI”) products and services. The distribution occurs primarily through consultants,
brokers, planners, agents, financial advisers, third-party administrators (“TPAs”) and other intermediaries. Group Protection distributes
its products and services primarily through employee benefit brokers, TPAs and other employee benefit firms. As of December 31, 2023,
LFD had approximately 520 internal and external wholesalers (including sales and relationship managers). As of December 31, 2023,
LFN offered LNC and non-proprietary products and advisory services through a national network of approximately 13,000 active
producers who placed business with us within the last 24 months.
Financial information in the tables that follow is presented in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”), unless otherwise indicated. We provide revenues, income (loss) from operations and assets attributable to each of
our business segments and Other Operations in Note 20.
Sale of Wealth Management Business
On December 14, 2023, we announced that we had entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Osaic Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Osaic”), pursuant to which Osaic agreed to acquire all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that
comprise the Company’s wealth management business operated through LFN. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of
2024, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. For additional information, see Note 1.
1
BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND OTHER OPERATIONS
ANNUITIES
Overview
The Annuities segment provides tax-deferred investment growth and lifetime income opportunities for its clients by offering variable
annuities, fixed (including indexed) annuities and indexed variable annuities, also referred to as registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”).
The “fixed” and “variable” classifications describe whether we or the policyholders bear the investment risk of the assets supporting the
contract. With “indexed variable” annuities, the extent to which we or the policyholders bear the investment risk of the assets is based on
the investment allocations. The annuity classification also determines the manner in which we earn investment margin profits from these
products, either as investment spreads for fixed products, as asset-based fees charged to variable products, or as both for RILA products.
Annuities have several features that are attractive to customers. Annuities are unique in that policyholders can select a variety of payout
alternatives to provide an income flow for life. Many annuity contracts also include guarantee features (living and death benefits) that are
not found in any other investment vehicle and that, we believe, make annuities attractive especially in times of economic uncertainty. In
addition, growth on the underlying principal in annuities is typically granted tax-deferred treatment, thereby deferring the tax
consequences of the growth in value until withdrawals are made from the accumulation values, potentially at lower tax rates occurring
during retirement.
Products
In general, an annuity is a contract between an insurance company and an individual in which the insurance company, after receipt of one
or more premium payments, agrees to pay an amount of money either in one lump sum or on a periodic basis (i.e., annually, semi-
annually, quarterly or monthly), beginning on a certain date and continuing for a period of time as specified in the contract or as
requested. Periodic payments can begin within 12 months after the premium is received (referred to as an immediate annuity) or at a
future date in time (referred to as a deferred annuity). This retirement vehicle helps protect an individual from outliving their money.
Variable Annuities
A variable annuity provides the contract holder the ability to direct the investment of premium deposits into one or more variable sub-
accounts (“variable funds”) offered through the product (“variable portion”) and, for a specified period, into a fixed account (if available)
with a guaranteed return (“fixed portion”). The value of the variable portion of the policyholder’s account varies with the performance of
the underlying variable funds chosen by the policyholder.
Our variable funds include the Managed Risk Strategies fund options, a series of funds that embed volatility risk management and, with
some funds, capital protection strategies inside the funds themselves. These funds seek to reduce equity market volatility risk for both the
contract holder and us.
We charge mortality and expense assessments and administrative fees on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative
expenses. These assessments are built into accumulation unit values, which when multiplied by the number of units owned for any
variable fund equals the contract holder’s account balance for that variable fund. In addition, for some contracts, we impose surrender
charges, which are typically applicable to withdrawals during the early years of the annuity contract, with a declining level of surrender
charges over time.
We offer guaranteed benefit riders with certain of our variable annuity products, such as a guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”), a
guaranteed withdrawal benefit (“GWB”), a guaranteed income benefit (“GIB”) and a combination of such benefits.
The GDB features offered include those where we contractually guarantee to the contract holder that upon death, depending on the
particular product, we will return no less than: the current contract value; the total deposits made to the contract, adjusted to reflect any
partial withdrawals; the highest contract value on a specified anniversary date adjusted to reflect any partial withdrawals following the
contract anniversary; or an earnings enhancement on gains in the contract.
We offer the optional Lincoln ProtectedPaySM lifetime income suite, which provides a GWB and includes: Secure Core, Secure Plus and
Secure Max, and Select Core, Select Plus and Select Max. All provide contract holders with protected lifetime income that is based on a
maximum rate of the income base that grows annually for a specified period of time at the greater of a specified simple rate or account
balance growth. The riders provide higher income if the contract holder delays withdrawals. The Secure Core and Select Core riders are
hybrid benefit riders combining aspects of GWB and GIB that provide a specified maximum rate of income. The Secure Plus and Secure
Max riders and Select Plus and Select Max riders provide contract holders with protected lifetime income up to a specified maximum rate
of the income base and a lower specified maximum rate of the income base if the account balance falls to zero. Contract holders under
2
the Secure riders are subject to the allocation of their account balance to our Managed Risk Strategies fund options and certain fixed-
income options. Contract holders under the Select riders are subject to restrictions on the allocation of their account balance within the
various investment choices.
We also offer the American Legacy® Target Date Income variable annuity with an optional Target Date Income Benefit rider, which
combines target date investing with a protected lifetime income. Contract holders who elect the Target Date Income Benefit are
automatically allocated to the Target Date Fund based on their year of birth. The protected lifetime income is based on a percentage rate
of income for their age at the time of purchase of the optional rider, which will grow at the greater of a specified simple rate (available
each year a withdrawal is not taken for a specified period of time) or account balance growth.
In addition, we offer the i4LIFE® Advantage and i4LIFE Advantage Guaranteed Income Benefit (Managed Risk) riders. These riders
allow variable annuity contract holders access and control during a portion of the income distribution phase of their contract. In general,
GIB is an optional feature available with the i4LIFE Advantage rider and a non-optional feature on the i4LIFE Advantage Guaranteed
Income Benefit (Managed Risk) rider that guarantees regular income payments will not fall below the greater of a minimum income floor
set at benefit issue and 75% of the highest income payment on a specified anniversary date (reduced for any subsequent withdrawals).
Contract holders under the i4LIFE Advantage Guaranteed Income Benefit (Managed Risk) rider are subject to the allocation of their
account balance to our Managed Risk Strategies fund options and certain fixed-income options.
We also offer the 4LATER® Select Advantage rider. This rider provides a minimum income base used to determine the GIB floor when
a client begins income payments under the i4LIFE Advantage Select Guaranteed Income Benefit rider. The 4LATER Select Advantage
rider provides growth during the accumulation phase through both an enhancement to the income base each year a withdrawal is not
taken for a specified period of time and an annual step-up of the income base to the current contract value. Contract holders under the
4LATER Select Advantage rider are subject to restrictions on the allocation of their account balance within the various investment
choices.
We design and actively manage the features and structure of our guaranteed benefit riders to maintain a competitive suite of products
consistent with profitability and risk management goals. We use a variety of hedging strategies to mitigate the risks to the statutory capital
of our insurance subsidiaries associated with our guaranteed benefit riders. For more information on our hedging program, see
“Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Market Risk Benefits” in the MD&A. For information regarding risks
related to our guaranteed benefits and hedging strategies, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in the equity
markets, interest rates and/or volatility affect the profitability of our products with guaranteed benefits; therefore, such changes may have
a material adverse effect on our business and profitability,” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Our hedging strategies
may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the carrying value of the guarantees on certain of our products, which could result in
volatility in our results of operations and financial condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance
subsidiaries.”
Fixed Annuities
A fixed annuity preserves the principal value of the contract while guaranteeing a minimum interest rate to be credited to the
accumulation value. Our fixed annuity product offerings consist of traditional fixed-rate and fixed indexed deferred annuities, as well as
fixed-rate immediate and deferred income annuities with various payment options, including lifetime incomes. Fixed annuity contracts
are general account obligations. We bear the investment risk for fixed annuity contracts. To protect from premature withdrawals, we
impose surrender charges. Surrender charges are typically applicable during the early years of the annuity contract, with a declining level
of surrender charges over time. On most policies, within the surrender charge period, we also have a market value adjustment provision
that protects us against disintermediation risk in the case of rapidly rising interest rates. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn
on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract
holders’ accounts.
We offer single and flexible premium fixed deferred annuities. Single premium fixed deferred annuities are contracts that allow only a
single premium to be paid. Flexible premium fixed deferred annuities are contracts that allow multiple premium payments, subject to
contractual limits, on either a scheduled or non-scheduled basis.
Our fixed indexed annuities allow the contract holder to choose between a fixed interest crediting rate and an indexed interest crediting
rate, which is based on the performance of the S&P 500® Index, the S&P 500 Daily Risk Control 5%TM Index, the S&P 500 Daily Risk
Control 10%TM Index, the J.P. Morgan First Trust Balanced Capital Strength 6SM Index, the J.P. Morgan First Trust Balanced Capital
Strength 5SM Index, the BlackRock Dynamic Allocation Index, or the Fidelity AIMSM Dividend Index. The indexed interest credit is
guaranteed never to be less than zero.
We use derivatives to hedge the equity market risk associated with our fixed indexed annuity products. For more information on our
hedging program, see “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Derivatives” in the MD&A.
3
RILA
Lincoln Level Advantage® is our RILA product. Lincoln Level Advantage provides the contract holder the ability to direct the
investment of premium deposits into one or more variable funds and/or indexed accounts offered through the product. The value of the
variable sub-accounts varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the contract holder. The index interest
crediting rate for an indexed account is based, in part, on the performance of an index. The available indices are the S&P 500® Index,
the Russell 2000® Index, the MSCI EAFE, the Capital Strength Net Fee IndexSM, the First Trust American Leadership IndexTM and the
NASDAQ-100 Index®.
We charge mortality and expense assessments and administrative fees on the variable funds to cover insurance and administrative
expenses. These assessments are built into accumulation unit values, which when multiplied by the number of units owned for any
variable fund equals the contract holder’s account balance for that variable fund. In addition, for some contracts, we impose surrender
charges, which are typically applicable during the early years of the annuity contract, with a declining level of surrender charges over time.
We offer a GDB rider where we contractually guarantee to the contract holder that upon death, depending on the particular product, we
will return no less than the current contract value or the total deposits made to the contract, adjusted to reflect any partial withdrawals.
We also offer the i4LIFE® Advantage rider. This rider allows annuity contract holders access and control during a portion of the income
distribution phase of their contract. This added flexibility allows the contract holder to access the account balance for transfers and
additional withdrawals.
We use derivatives to hedge the equity market risk associated with our indexed variable annuity products. For more information on our
hedging program, see “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Derivatives” in the MD&A.
Distribution
The Annuities segment distributes its individual fixed and variable annuity products through LFD. LFD’s distribution channels give the
Annuities segment access to its target markets. LFD distributes the segment’s products to a large number of financial intermediaries,
including LFN. The financial intermediaries include wire/regional firms, independent financial planners, financial institutions, registered
investment advisers and managing general agents.
Competition
The annuities market is very competitive and consists of many companies, with no one company dominating the market for all products.
The Annuities segment competes with numerous other financial services companies. The main factors upon which entities in this market
compete are distribution channel access and the quality of wholesalers, investment performance, cost, breadth of product portfolio and
features, speed to market, brand recognition, financial strength ratings, crediting rates and client service.
Overview
LIFE INSURANCE
The Life Insurance segment focuses on the creation and protection of wealth for its clients by providing life insurance products, including
term insurance, both single (including universal life insurance (“UL”), COLI and BOLI) and survivorship versions of indexed universal
life insurance (“IUL”) and variable universal life insurance (“VUL”) products, linked-benefit products (which are UL and VUL with riders
providing for long-term care costs), and critical illness and long-term care riders, which can be attached to IUL or VUL policies. Some of
our products include secondary guarantees, which are discussed more fully below. Generally, this segment has higher sales during the
second half of the year with the fourth quarter being the strongest.
Similar to the annuity product classifications described above, life products can be classified as “fixed” (including indexed) or “variable”
contracts. These classifications describe whether we or the contract holders bear the primary investment risk of the assets supporting the
policy. This also determines the manner in which we earn investment margin profits from these products, either as investment spreads
for fixed products or as asset-based fees charged to variable products.
In general, the Life Insurance segment’s sources of revenue include premium payments, cost of insurance assessments, expense and fee
charges and investment income. In turn, this segment incurs expenses, which include paying death claims, long-term care claims, and
surrender benefits, crediting interest, and accruing reserves for future claim payments, as well as other expenses related to the business.
The difference between revenue earned and expenses incurred is the profit for the Life Insurance business. Profitability, including
fluctuations from period to period, is impacted by factors such as changes in sales of products, mortality experience (the frequency and
magnitude of mortality claims paid during a given period), persistency and investment income. The impact of each factor varies by
product type.
4
Products
We offer four categories of life insurance products, consisting of:
UL and IUL
UL insurance products provide life insurance with account balances that earn rates of return solely based on company-declared interest
rates. Contract holder account balances are invested in our general account investment portfolio, so we bear the risk of investment
performance. Our fixed IUL products function similarly to a traditional UL policy, with the added flexibility of allowing contract holders
to have portions of their account balances earn credits based on the performance of indexes such as the S&P 500® Index. These
products include Lincoln WealthPreserve® IUL and Lincoln WealthAccumulate® IUL.
In a UL contract, contract holders typically have flexibility in the timing and amount of premium payments and the amount of death
benefit, provided there is sufficient account balance to cover all policy charges for cost of insurance and expenses for the coming period.
Under certain contract holder options and market conditions, the death benefit amount may increase or decrease. Premiums received on
a UL product, net of expense loads and charges, are added to the contract holder’s account balance and accrued with interest. The client
has access to their account balance (or a portion thereof), less surrender charges and policy loan payoffs, through contractual liquidity
features such as loans, partial withdrawals and full surrenders. Loans and withdrawals reduce the death benefit amount payable and are
limited to certain contractual maximums (some of which are required under state law), and interest is charged on all loans. Our UL
contracts assess surrender charges against the policies’ account balances for full or partial surrenders and certain policy
changes that occur during the contractual surrender charge period. Depending on the product selected, surrender charge periods can
range from 0 to 25 years.
We offer a survivorship version of our individual IUL products, Lincoln WealthPreserve® SIUL. This product insures two lives with a
single policy and pays death benefits upon the second death.
A UL policy with a lifetime secondary guarantee can stay in force, even if the base policy cash value is zero, as long as secondary
guarantee requirements have been met. The secondary guarantee requirement is based on the payment of a required minimum premium
or on the evaluation of a reference value within the policy, calculated in a manner similar to the base policy account balance, but using
different expense charges, cost of insurance charges and credited interest rates. The parameters for the secondary guarantee requirement
are listed in the contract. As long as the contract holder pays the minimum premium or funds the policy to a level that keeps this
calculated reference value positive, the policy is guaranteed to stay in force. The reference value has no actual monetary value to the
contract holder; it is only a calculated value used to determine whether or not the policy will lapse should the base policy cash value be
less than zero. During 2022, we discontinued new sales of UL products with secondary guarantees, but we still have an in-force block of
such products that we continue to administer.
VUL
VUL products are UL products that provide a return on account balances linked to an underlying investment portfolio of variable funds
offered through the product. The value of the variable portion of the contract holder’s account is driven by the performance of the
underlying variable funds chosen by the contract holder. As the return on the investment portfolio increases or decreases, that portion of
the account balance of the VUL policy will increase or decrease. In addition, VUL products offer a fixed account option that is managed
by us. As with fixed UL products, contract holders have access, within contractual maximums, to account balances through loans,
withdrawals and surrenders. Surrender charges are assessed during the surrender charge period, ranging from 0 to 20 years depending on
the product. Our single life VUL offerings include Lincoln AssetEdge® VUL and Lincoln VULONE insurance products. Our COLI
products are also VUL-type products.
We also offer a survivorship version of our individual VUL products, Lincoln SVULONE. This product insures two lives with a single
policy and pays death benefits upon the second death.
We offer lifetime guaranteed benefit riders with our Lincoln VULONE and Lincoln SVULONE products. The ONE rider features guarantee to
the contract holder that upon death, as long as secondary guarantee requirements have been met, the death benefit will be payable even if
the account balance equals zero.
Our secondary guarantee benefits maintain the flexibility of a UL or VUL policy, which allow a contract holder to take loans or
withdrawals. Although loans and withdrawals are likely to shorten the time period of the secondary guarantee, the guarantee is not
automatically or completely forfeited. Additional premium may be deposited to extend the length of the guarantee. For additional
information on our reserves on UL and VUL products with secondary guarantees, see Note 13.
5
Linked-Benefit Life Products and Products with Critical Illness Riders
Lincoln MoneyGuard®, our linked-benefit life product group, combines UL or VUL with long-term care insurance through the use of a
rider or riders. The policy rider allows the contract holder to accelerate death benefits on a tax-free basis in the event of a qualified long-
term care need, reducing the remaining death benefit, and, once the death benefit is exhausted, offers access to an additional pool of
dollars that can be used for qualified long-term care expenses. Certain policies also provide a reduced death benefit to the contract
holder’s beneficiary if the death benefit has been fully accelerated as long-term care benefits during the contract holder’s life.
Some life products provide for critical illness or long-term care insurance by the use of riders attached to IUL or VUL policies. These
riders allow the contract holder to accelerate death benefits on a tax-free basis in the event of a qualified condition.
Term Life Insurance
Term life insurance provides a fixed death benefit for a scheduled period of time. Our term life insurance products give the contract
holder the option to convert into a UL, IUL or VUL product. Scheduled policy premiums are required to be paid at least annually.
These products include Lincoln TermAccel® Level Term and Lincoln LifeElements® Level Term.
Distribution
The Life Insurance segment’s products are sold through LFD. LFD provides the Life Insurance segment with access to financial
intermediaries in the following primary distribution channels: wire/regional firms; independent planner firms (including LFN); financial
institutions; and managing general agents/independent marketing organizations. LFD distributes BOLI/COLI products and services to
banks and mid- to large-sized corporations, primarily through intermediaries who specialize in one or both of these markets and who are
serviced through a network of internal and external LFD sales professionals.
Competition
The life insurance market is very competitive and consists of many companies with no one company dominating the market for all
products. Principal competitive factors include product features, price, underwriting and issue process, customer service and insurers’
financial strength. With our broad distribution network, we compete in the three primary needs of life insurance: death benefit
protection, accumulation and linked benefits (MoneyGuard). In addition, we use automated underwriting within a defined criteria as well
as LincXpress®, a streamlined issue process, both of which are seen as marketplace competitive advantages.
Underwriting
In the context of life insurance, underwriting is the process of evaluating medical and non-medical information about an individual and
determining the effect these factors statistically have on mortality. This process of evaluation is often referred to as risk classification. No
one can accurately predict how long any individual will live, but certain risk factors can affect life expectancy and are evaluated during the
underwriting process.
Claims Administration
Claims service is handled primarily in-house, and claims examiners are assigned to each claim notification based on coverage amount, type
of claim and the experience of the examiner. Claims meeting certain criteria are referred to senior claims examiners. A formal quality
assurance program is carried out to ensure the consistency and effectiveness of claims examining activities. A network of in-house legal
counsel, compliance officers, medical personnel and an anti-fraud investigative unit also support claims examiners. A special team of
claims examiners, in conjunction with claims management, focus on more complex claims matters such as claims incurred during the
contestable period, beneficiary disputes and litigated claims. Long-term care claims are handled primarily by a third-party administrator.
Overview
GROUP PROTECTION
The Group Protection segment offers group non-medical insurance products and services, including short- and long-term disability,
statutory disability and paid family medical leave administration and absence management services, term life, dental, vision and accident,
critical illness and hospital indemnity benefits and services to the employer marketplace through various forms of employee-paid and
employer-paid plans. Group Protection markets its products and services to employer groups of all sizes, from small companies with
fewer than 100 employees to large employers with 10,000 or more employees.
6
Products
Disability Insurance and Services
We offer insured coverage for, as well as administrative services for employer self-funded, short- and long-term employer-sponsored
group and voluntary disability insurance, which protects an employee against loss of wages due to illness or injury. Short-term disability
insurance generally provides weekly benefits for up to 26 weeks following a short waiting period, ranging from 1 to 30 days. Long-term
disability insurance provides benefits following a longer waiting period, usually between 90 and 180 days, and provides benefits for a
longer period, up to normal (Social Security) retirement age. The monthly benefits provided are subject to reduction when Social Security
benefits are also paid. We also provide insured coverage for, as well as administrative services for employer self-funded, state-specific
statutory disability and paid family leave programs.
Absence Management
We offer a robust portfolio of absence management services to help employers manage their state and federal family medical and
company leave programs (paid and unpaid), as well as accommodation services that help employers identify accommodations that could
be made to help claimants return to work (e.g., assistive devices, ergonomic assessments, etc.). Our comprehensive and compliant
solutions, with ease of intake, provide coordinated and integrated management expertise to handle both leave and disability events.
Life Insurance
We offer employer-sponsored group term life insurance products including basic, optional, and voluntary term life insurance to
employees and their dependents. Additional benefits may be provided in the event of a covered individual’s accidental death or
dismemberment.
Dental and Vision
We offer a variety of employer-sponsored group dental insurance plans, which cover a portion of the cost of eligible dental procedures
for employees and their dependents. Products offered include: indemnity coverage, which does not distinguish benefits based on a
dental provider’s participation in a network arrangement; Preferred Provider Organization (“PPO”) products, on an insured and
administrative services only basis, that do reflect the dental provider’s participation in the PPO network arrangement, including an
agreement with network fee schedules; a Dental Health Maintenance Organization product that limits benefit coverage to a closed panel
of network providers; an in-network-only option that limits benefit coverage to providers in certain states; and self-funded options for
groups with more than 200 employees.
We also offer comprehensive employer-sponsored fully insured vision plans with a wide range of benefits for protecting employees’ and
their covered dependents’ sight and vision health. All plans provide access to a national network of providers, with in and out-of-network
benefits.
Accident, Critical Illness and Hospital Indemnity Insurance
We offer employer-sponsored group accident insurance products for employees and their covered dependents. This product is
predominantly purchased on an employee-paid basis. Accident insurance provides scheduled benefits for over 30 types of benefit triggers
related to accidental causes, including sports-related injuries, and is available for non-occupational accidents exclusively or on a 24-hour
coverage basis.
We also offer employer-sponsored group critical illness insurance to employees and their covered dependents. This product is
predominantly purchased on an employee-paid basis. The coverage provides for lump sum payouts upon the occurrence of one of the
specified critical illness benefit triggers covered within a critical illness insurance policy. This product also includes benefits and services
that assist employees and their family members in the prevention, early detection and treatment of critical illness events.
We also offer hospital indemnity insurance as part of our suite of supplemental health solutions. Similar to our employer-sponsored
group accident and critical illness insurance, hospital indemnity is offered to employees and their covered dependents and is
predominantly purchased on an employee-paid basis. Hospital indemnity insurance provides scheduled benefits for hospital admission
and daily confinement, as well as over 20 benefit triggers related to hospitalization due to an accident and/or illness.
7
Distribution
The Group Protection segment’s products are marketed primarily through a national distribution system. The managers and marketing
representatives develop business through employee benefit brokers, consultants, and other employee benefit firms that work with
employers to provide access to our products
Competition
The group protection marketplace is very competitive. Principal competitive factors include product features, price, quality of customer
service and claims management, technological capabilities, quality and efficiency of distribution and financial strength ratings. In this
market, the Group Protection segment competes nationally with a number of major companies and regionally with other companies
offering all or some of the products within our product set. In addition, there is competition in attracting brokers to actively market our
products and attracting and retaining sales representatives to sell our products. Key competitive factors in attracting brokers include
product offerings and features, financial strength, support services and compensation.
Underwriting
The Group Protection segment’s underwriters evaluate the risk characteristics of each employer group. Generally, the relevant
characteristics evaluated include employee census information (such as age, gender, income and occupation), employer industry
classification, geographic location, benefit design elements and other factors. The segment employs detailed underwriting policies,
guidelines and procedures designed to assist the underwriter to properly assess and quantify risks. Individual underwriting techniques
(including evaluation of individual medical history information) may be used on certain covered individuals selecting benefit amounts that
are above guarantee issue limits set forth in the insurance policies. For voluntary and other forms of employee paid coverages, minimum
participation requirements are used to obtain a better spread of risk and minimize the risk of anti-selection.
Claims Administration
Claims for the Group Protection segment are managed by claim specialists. Claims are evaluated for eligibility and payment of benefits
pursuant to the group insurance contract or self-insured plan and in compliance with federal and state laws and regulations. Efficient and
accurate disability claims management is especially important to customer service satisfaction and segment results. Financial results can
be impacted by both the incidence and the length of approved disability claims. The segment employs a variety of clinical experts,
including employee and contract medical professionals and rehabilitation specialists, to evaluate medically supported functional
capabilities and to assist in the development of return to work plans. The accuracy and speed of life claims are important customer
service and risk management factors. Some life policies include a waiver of premium provision in the event of the insured’s disability.
Dental claims management focuses on assisting plan administrators and members with the rising costs of insurance by utilizing tools to
optimize dental claims payment accuracy through advanced claims review and validation, improved data analysis, enhanced clinical review
of claims and provider utilization monitoring.
Overview
RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
The Retirement Plan Services segment provides employers with retirement plan products and services, primarily in the defined
contribution retirement plan marketplace. Defined contribution plans are a popular employee benefit offered by employers large and
small across a wide spectrum of industries. While our focus is employer-sponsored defined contribution plans, we also serve the defined
benefit plan and individual retirement account (“IRA”) markets on a limited basis. We provide a variety of plan investment vehicles,
including individual and group variable annuities, group fixed annuities and mutual fund-based programs. We also offer a broad array of
plan services including plan recordkeeping, compliance testing, participant education and trust and custodial services through our
affiliated trust company, Lincoln Financial Group Trust Company.
Products and Services
The Retirement Plan Services segment currently brings three primary offerings to the employer-sponsored market: LINCOLN
DIRECTORSM group variable annuity, LINCOLN ALLIANCE® program and Multi-Fund® variable annuity. The LINCOLN
ALLIANCE program is a mutual fund-based record-keeping platform. These offerings primarily cover the 403(b), 401(k) and 457 plan
marketplaces. The 403(b) plans are available to educational institutions, not-for-profit healthcare organizations and certain other not-for-
profit entities 401(k) plans are generally available to for-profit entities; and 457 plans are available to not-for-profit entities and state and
local government entities. The investment options for our products encompass the spectrum of asset classes with varying levels of risk
and include both equity and fixed-income.
8
LINCOLN DIRECTORSM group variable annuity is primarily a 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan solution available to small
businesses, typically those with plans having less than $10 million in account balances. The LINCOLN DIRECTOR product offers
participants a broad array of investment options from several fund families and a fixed account. The Retirement Plan Services segment
earns revenue through asset charges and/or separate account charges, which are used to pay our fees for recordkeeping services. We also
receive fees from the underlying mutual fund companies for the services we provide, and we earn investment margins on assets in the
fixed account. Through the LINCOLN DIRECTOR product, as well the LINCOLN ALLIANCE® product discussed below, we also
offer our proprietary YourPath® portfolios, a series of target-date portfolios for employer-sponsored retirement plans. These target-date
portfolios are managed along multiple risk-based paths to support a more personalized investment approach based upon financial
circumstances and risk tolerance. These target-date portfolios are also available with an income solution in the form of a GWB.
The LINCOLN ALLIANCE program is a defined contribution retirement plan solution aimed at small, mid-large and large market
employers, typically those that have defined contribution plans with $10 million or more in account balance. The target market is
primarily healthcare providers, public sector employers, corporations and educational institutions. The program bundles our traditional
fixed annuity products with the employer’s choice of mutual funds, along with recordkeeping, plan compliance services and customized
employee education services. The program allows the use of any mutual fund. We earn fees for our recordkeeping and educational
services and other services that we provide to plan sponsors and participants. We also earn investment spreads on fixed annuities.
Multi-Fund® variable annuity is a defined contribution retirement plan solution with fully bundled administrative services and investment
choices for small- to mid-sized healthcare, education, governmental and not-for-profit employers sponsoring 403(b), 457(b) and 401(a)/
(k) plans. The product is available to the employer through the Multi-Fund group variable annuity contract or directly to the individual
participant through the Multi-Fund Select variable annuity contract. We earn mortality and expense charges, investment income on the
fixed account and surrender charges from this product. We also receive fees for services that we provide to funds in the underlying
separate accounts.
Additionally, we offer other products and services that complement our primary offerings:
• The Lincoln Next Step® series of products is a suite of mutual fund-based IRAs available exclusively for participants in Lincoln-
serviced retirement plans and their spouses. The products can accept rollovers and transfers from other providers as well as ongoing
contributions. The Lincoln Next Step IRA product has no annual account charges and offers an array of mutual fund investment
options provided by 20 fund families all offered at net asset value. The Lincoln Next Step Select IRA has an annual record keeping
charge and offers an even wider array of mutual fund investment options from over 20 families, all at net asset value. We earn 12b-1
and service fees on the mutual funds within the product.
• Through a group annuity contract, we offer a series of products intended to fulfill future needs of retirement security for our clients.
By offering a GWB inside a retirement plan, we provide plan sponsors a solution that gives participants the ability to participate in the
market and receive guaranteed income for life while still maintaining access to their plan account balance. These products are
available both to retirement plans where we provide plan recordkeeping services and those where we do not.
• Through a group annuity contract or funding agreement, we offer fixed return products to retirement plans and other institutional
contract holders where we do not provide plan recordkeeping services. The fixed annuity or funding agreement is used within small,
mid-large and large employer plan sponsors or institutional investors. The contract provides a conservative investment option for
those seeking stability. In some cases, we earn investment spreads on assets in the fixed account, and in other product versions we
earn a fee on assets in the underlying custodial account.
Distribution
Retirement Plan Services products are primarily distributed in two ways: through our Institutional Retirement Distribution team and by
LFD. These teams distribute these products through advisers, consultants, banks, wirehouses and individual planners. We remain
focused on wholesaler productivity, increasing relationship management expertise and growing the number of broker-dealer relationships.
The Multi-Fund program is sold primarily by affiliated advisers. The LINCOLN ALLIANCE program is sold primarily through
consultants, registered independent advisers and both affiliated and non-affiliated financial advisers, planners and wirehouses. LINCOLN
DIRECTOR group variable annuity is sold in the small plan marketplace by intermediaries, including financial advisers and planners.
Competition
The retirement plan marketplace is very competitive and comprised of many providers with no one company dominating the market for
all products. As stated above, we compete with numerous other financial services corporations in the small, mid and large employer-size
markets. The main factors upon which entities in this market compete are product strength, technology, service model delivery,
participant education models, quality of wholesale distribution access to intermediary firms and brand recognition. Our key differentiator
9
is our technology enabled people-connected service model, which leverages digitally focused tools with personalized support and has been
shown to drive positive outcomes for plan sponsors and participants.
OTHER OPERATIONS
Other Operations includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. Other Operations
includes investments related to the excess capital in our insurance subsidiaries; corporate investments; benefit plan net liability; the results
of certain disability income business; our run-off Institutional Pension business in the form of group annuity and insured funding-type of
contracts; debt; and Spark program expenses.
REINSURANCE
Our reinsurance strategy is designed to protect our insurance subsidiaries against the severity of losses on individual claims and unusually
serious occurrences in which a number of claims produce an aggregate extraordinary loss. Although reinsurance does not discharge the
insurance subsidiaries from their primary liabilities to their contract holders for losses insured under the insurance policies, it does make
the assuming reinsurer liable to the insurance subsidiaries for the reinsured portion of the risk. Because we bear the risk of nonpayment
by one or more of our reinsurers, we primarily cede reinsurance to well-capitalized, highly rated unaffiliated reinsurers. We also utilize
inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity
guarantees. These inter-company agreements do not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2023, the policy for our reinsurance program was to retain up to $20 million on a single insured life. For more
information, see Note 8.
Some portions of our annuity and life businesses have been reinsured on either a coinsurance or a modified coinsurance basis with other
companies. In a coinsurance program, the reinsurer shares proportionally in all financial terms of the reinsured policies (i.e., premiums,
expenses, claims, etc.) based on their respective percentage of the risk. In a modified coinsurance program, we as the ceding company
retain the reserves, as well as the assets backing those reserves, and the reinsurer shares proportionally in all financial terms of the
reinsured policies based on their respective percentage of the risk.
In addition, we acquire other reinsurance to cover products other than as discussed above with retentions and limits that management
believes are appropriate for the circumstances. For example, we use reinsurance to cover larger life and disability claims in our Group
Protection business.
We obtain reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers, and we monitor concentration and financial strength ratings of our principal
reinsurers. Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude Re”), Protective Life Insurance Company, Security Life of Denver
Insurance Company (a subsidiary of Resolution Life that we refer to herein as “Resolution Life”) and Athene Holding Ltd. (“Athene”)
represent our largest reinsurance exposures. For more information regarding our reinsurance arrangements and exposure, see
“Reinsurance” in the MD&A and Note 8. For risks involving reinsurance, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face
risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
RESERVES
The applicable insurance laws under which insurance companies operate require that they report, as liabilities, policy reserves to meet
future obligations on their outstanding policies. These reserves are the amounts that, with the additional premiums to be received and
interest thereon compounded annually at certain assumed rates, are calculated to be sufficient to meet the various policy and contract
obligations as they mature. These laws specify that the reserves shall not be less than reserves calculated using certain specified mortality
and morbidity tables, interest rates and methods of valuation. From time to time, the insurance laws, regulations, or regulatory guidance
that specify the mortality and morbidity tables, interest rates and methods of valuation may be changed or interpreted differently, which
may result in changes in the required reserves of our insurance subsidiaries. For more information on reserves, see “Summary of Critical
Accounting Estimates – Future Contract Benefits” in the MD&A. For information on risks regarding changes in regulations, see “Item
1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax – Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation and in supervisory
and enforcement policies may affect our insurance subsidiary capital requirements, reduce our profitability, limit our growth or otherwise
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
See “Regulatory” below for information on permitted practices and proposed regulations that may impact the amount of statutory
reserves necessary to support our current insurance liabilities.
For risks related to reserves, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates
may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory
requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational
10
Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of
operations.”
INVESTMENTS
An important component of our financial results is the return on investments. Our investment strategy is to balance the need for current
income with prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income to meet our obligations. This approach
requires the evaluation of risk and expected return of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach
also permits us to be more effective in our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and
current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. Investments made by our insurance subsidiaries must comply
with the insurance laws and regulations of the states of domicile.
Derivatives are used primarily for hedging purposes. Hedging strategies are employed for a number of reasons including, but not limited
to, hedging certain portions of our exposure to changes in interest rate fluctuations, credit risks, foreign exchange risks, equity risks and
the market-implied volatilities associated with guaranteed benefit riders available in our variable annuity products. In September 2022, we
announced enhancements to our variable annuity hedge program that continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future
claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. The revised variable annuity hedge program,
effective January 1, 2023, aligns with our increased strategic focus on maximizing the economic value as measured by distributable
earnings, which is achieved by managing risks to capital generation due to market volatility. For additional information on our
investments, including carrying values by category, quality ratings and net investment income, see “Consolidated Investments” in the
MD&A, as well as Notes 1 and 4. For additional information on our variable annuity hedging program, see “Introduction – Summary of
Critical Accounting Estimates – Market Risk Benefits” in the MD&A.
FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS
The Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations rate the financial strength of our principal insurance subsidiaries.
Rating agencies rate insurance companies based on financial strength and the ability to pay claims, factors more relevant to contract
holders than investors. We believe that the ratings assigned by nationally recognized, independent rating agencies are material to our
operations. There may be other rating agencies that also rate our insurance companies that we do not disclose in our reports.
The insurer financial strength rating scales of AM Best, Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global
Ratings (“S&P”) are characterized as follows:
AM Best – A++ to D
Fitch – AAA to C
•
•
• Moody’s – Aaa to C
•
S&P – AAA to D
As of February 16, 2024, the financial strength ratings of our principal insurance subsidiaries, as published by the principal rating agencies
that rate us, were as follows:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
(“LNL”)
AM Best
A
Fitch
A+
Moody's
A2
S&P
A+
(3rd highest of 16)
(5th highest of 19)
(6th highest of 21)
(5th highest of 21)
Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York
(“LLANY”)
A
A+
A2
A+
(3rd highest of 16)
(5th highest of 19)
(6th highest of 21)
(5th highest of 21)
First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company
(“FPP”)
A
A+
A2
A-
(3rd highest of 16)
(5th highest of 19)
(6th highest of 21)
(7th highest of 21)
A downgrade of the financial strength rating of one of our principal insurance subsidiaries could affect our competitive position in the
insurance industry and make it more difficult for us to market our products, as potential customers may select companies with higher
financial strength ratings. See also “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit
11
ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our
relationships with creditors.”
Our insurer financial strength ratings are on outlook stable except for the ratings assigned by Fitch for all three insurance subsidiaries and
the rating assigned by AM Best for FPP, which are on outlook negative. All of our ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any
time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that our principal insurance subsidiaries can maintain these ratings.
Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Ratings are not recommendations to buy our securities. See
“Liquidity and Capital Resources – Ratings” in the MD&A for a discussion of our credit ratings.
Insurance Regulation
REGULATORY
Our insurance subsidiaries, like other insurance companies, are subject to regulation and supervision by the states, territories and
countries in which they are licensed to do business. The extent of such regulation varies, but generally has its source in statutes that
delegate regulatory, supervisory and administrative authority to supervisory agencies. The U.S. federal government does not directly
regulate the insurance industry. In the United States, this power is vested in state insurance departments.
In supervising and regulating insurance companies, state insurance departments, charged primarily with protecting contract holders and
the public rather than investors, enjoy broad authority and discretion in applying applicable insurance laws and regulation for that
purpose. Our principal insurance subsidiaries, LNL, LLANY and FPP, are domiciled in the states of Indiana, New York and Indiana,
respectively.
The insurance departments of the domiciliary states exercise principal regulatory jurisdiction over our insurance subsidiaries. The extent
of regulation by the states varies, but, in general, most jurisdictions have laws and regulations governing standards of solvency, adequacy
of reserves, reinsurance, capital adequacy, licensing of companies and agents to transact business, prescribing and approving policy forms,
regulating premium rates for some lines of business, prescribing the form and content of financial statements and reports, regulating the
type and amount of investments permitted and standards of business conduct. Insurance company regulation is discussed further in this
section under “Insurance Holding Company Regulation.”
As part of their regulatory oversight process, state insurance departments conduct periodic examinations, generally once every three to
five years, of the books, records, accounts and business practices of insurers domiciled in their states. Examinations are generally carried
out in cooperation with the insurance regulators of other states under guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (“NAIC”). State and federal insurance and securities regulatory authorities and other state law enforcement agencies and
Attorneys General also, from time to time, make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations regarding the compliance by our
company, as well as other companies in our industry, with, among other things, insurance laws and securities laws. Our captive
reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to periodic financial examinations by their respective domiciliary state insurance
regulators. We have not received any material adverse findings resulting from state insurance department examinations of our insurance,
reinsurance and captive reinsurance subsidiaries conducted during the three-year period ended December 31, 2023.
State insurance laws and regulations require our U.S. insurance companies to file financial statements with state insurance departments
everywhere they do business, and the operations of our U.S. insurance companies and accounts are subject to examination by those
departments at any time. Our U.S. insurance companies prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices
and procedures prescribed or permitted by these departments. The NAIC has approved a series of statutory accounting principles
(“SAP”) that have been adopted, in some cases with minor modifications, by virtually all state insurance departments. Changes in these
statutory accounting principles can significantly affect our capital and surplus.
In August 2023, the NAIC approved temporary guidance to allow companies to admit a portion of net negative interest maintenance
reserves (“IMR”) as an asset under certain conditions, up to a capital and surplus percentage limit. This guidance became effective for
periods ending September 30, 2023 and will sunset on December 31, 2025, and has the effect of modestly increasing our statutory capital
and risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio.
In December 2022, the NAIC approved changes to Actuarial Guideline XLIX (“AG49”) that affect the way insurance companies are
permitted to illustrate certain IUL products. We were required to comply with the amended guideline, AG49-B, for any IUL products
sold on, or after, May 1, 2023, and such compliance could impact our sales of such products. The NAIC is also considering
modifications to the economic scenario generator used to calculate life and annuity reserves according to the Valuation Manual (e.g.,
VM-20 and VM-21) and the required capital for these life and annuity contracts, as well as certain fixed annuity and single premium life
insurance products, which could affect the level and volatility of statutory reserves and required capital for products in scope. These
modifications are expected to be implemented by January 1, 2025, at the earliest. Effective December 31, 2022, the NAIC revised the C-2
mortality calculation that resulted in a small decrease in RBC. For more information, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory
and Tax – Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation and in supervisory and enforcement policies may affect our
12
insurance subsidiary capital requirements, reduce our profitability, limit our growth or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.” We are monitoring all potential changes and evaluating the potential impact they could have on our
product offerings, financial condition and results of operations.
For more information on statutory reserving and our use of captive reinsurance structures, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources –
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Subsidiaries’ Capital” in the MD&A.
Insurance Holding Company Regulation
LNC and its primary insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation pursuant to the insurance holding company laws of the states of
Indiana and New York. These insurance holding company laws generally require an insurance holding company and insurers that are
members of such insurance holding company’s system to register with the insurance department authorities, to file with it certain reports
disclosing information, including their capital structure, ownership, management, financial condition and certain inter-company
transactions, including material transfers of assets and inter-company business agreements, and to report material changes in that
information. These laws also require that inter-company transactions be fair and reasonable and, under certain circumstances, prior
approval of the insurance departments must be received before entering into an inter-company transaction. Further, these laws require
that an insurer’s contract holders’ surplus following any dividends or distributions to shareholder affiliates is reasonable in relation to the
insurer’s outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs.
In general, under state holding company regulations, no person may acquire, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in our capital
stock unless such individual, corporation or other entity has obtained prior approval from the applicable insurance commissioner for such
acquisition of control. Pursuant to such laws, in general, any person acquiring, controlling or holding the power to vote, directly or
indirectly, 10% or more of the voting securities of an insurance company, is presumed to have “control” of such company. This
presumption may be rebutted by a showing that control does not exist in fact. The insurance commissioner, however, may find that
“control” exists in circumstances in which a person owns or controls a smaller amount of voting securities. To obtain approval from the
insurance commissioner of any acquisition of control of an insurance company, the proposed acquirer must file with the applicable
commissioner an application containing information regarding: the identity and background of the acquirer and its affiliates; the nature,
source and amount of funds to be used to carry out the acquisition; the financial statements of the acquirer and its affiliates; any potential
plans for disposition of the securities or business of the insurer; the number and type of securities to be acquired; any contracts with
respect to the securities to be acquired; any agreements with broker-dealers; and other matters.
Other jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries are licensed to transact business may have similar or additional requirements for
prior approval of any acquisition of control of an insurance or reinsurance company licensed or authorized to transact business in those
jurisdictions. Additional requirements in those jurisdictions may include re-licensing or subsequent approval for renewal of existing
licenses upon an acquisition of control. In addition, laws that govern the holding company structure also govern payment of dividends to
us by our insurance subsidiaries. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital –
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends” in the MD&A for a discussion of restrictions on subsidiaries’ dividends and other payments.
Risk-Based Capital
The NAIC has adopted RBC requirements for life insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus in
relation to investment and insurance risks. The requirements provide a means of measuring the minimum amount of statutory surplus
appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations based on its size and risk profile. There are five major
risks involved in determining the requirements:
Category
Asset risk – affiliates
Asset risk – others
Insurance risk
Name
C-0
C-1
C-2
Description
Risk of declining value of insurance subsidiaries and risk from off-balance sheet
and other miscellaneous accounts
Risk of assets’ default of principal and interest or fluctuation in fair value
Risk of underestimating liabilities from business already written or inadequately pricing
business to be written in the future
Interest rate risk, health
C-3
Risk of losses due to changes in interest rate levels, risk that health benefits prepaid to
credit risk and market risk
providers become the obligation of the health insurer once again and risk of loss due
to changes in market levels associated with variable products with guarantees
Business risk
C-4
Risk of general business
A company’s risk-based statutory surplus is calculated by applying factors and performing calculations relating to various asset, premium,
claim, expense and reserve items. Regulators can then measure adequacy of a company’s statutory surplus by comparing it to the RBC
13
determined by the formula. Under RBC requirements, regulatory compliance is determined by the ratio of a company’s total adjusted
capital, as defined by the NAIC, to its company action level of RBC (known as the RBC ratio), also as defined by the NAIC.
Accordingly, factors that have an impact on the total adjusted capital of our insurance subsidiaries, such as the permitted practices
discussed above or changes in actuarial assumptions that cause us to increase our reserves, will also affect their RBC levels. Four levels of
regulatory attention may be triggered if the RBC ratio is insufficient:
•
•
•
•
“Company action level” – If the RBC ratio is between 75% and 100%, then the insurer must submit a plan to the regulator detailing
corrective action it proposes to undertake;
“Regulatory action level” – If the RBC ratio is between 50% and 75%, then the insurer must submit a plan, but a regulator may also
issue a corrective order requiring the insurer to comply within a specified period;
“Authorized control level” – If the RBC ratio is between 35% and 50%, then the regulatory response is the same as at the
“Regulatory action level,” but, in addition, the regulator may take action to rehabilitate or liquidate the insurer; and
“Mandatory control level” – If the RBC ratio is less than 35%, then the regulator must rehabilitate or liquidate the insurer.
As of December 31, 2023, the RBC ratios of LNL, LLANY and FPP reported to their respective states of domicile and the NAIC all
exceeded the “company action level.” We believe that we will be able to maintain the RBC ratios of our insurance subsidiaries in excess
of “company action level” through prudent underwriting, claims handling, investing and capital management. However, no assurances
can be given that developments affecting the insurance subsidiaries, many of which could be outside of our control, will not cause the
RBC ratios to fall below the “company action level” or below our targeted levels, which are significantly higher than the “company action
level.” These developments may include, but may not be limited to: changes to the manner in which the RBC ratio is calculated; new
regulatory requirements for calculating reserves, such as principles-based reserving; economic conditions leading to higher levels of
impairments of securities in our insurance subsidiaries’ general accounts; and an inability to finance life reserves such as through the
issuance of letters of credit (“LOCs”) supporting inter-company reinsurance structures.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may
result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax –
Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation and in supervisory and enforcement policies may affect our insurance
subsidiary capital requirements, reduce our profitability, limit our growth or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations
and financial condition.”
Privacy and Cybersecurity Regulation
We collect, process and maintain personal information from individuals who interact with our business, which subjects us to numerous
privacy laws and regulations. These laws require, among other things, that we institute certain policies and procedures in our business to
safeguard this information from improper use or disclosure; disclose our collection, processing, use and sharing practices to individuals;
allow individuals, in certain circumstances, to access, correct, and delete their personal information; and, in some cases, allow individuals
to opt out of certain data sharing practices. We must also promptly notify and report certain types of incidents involving this data. The
laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction, and it is expected that additional laws and regulations will continue to be enacted.
We are also subject to information security laws and regulations that impose governance and compliance obligations applicable to our
business. For example, in 2017, the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) enacted a regulation establishing
cybersecurity requirements for financial services companies (the “NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation”). The NYDFS Cybersecurity
Regulation included specific technical safeguards as well as requirements regarding governance, incident planning, training, data
management, system testing and regulator notification in the event of certain cybersecurity events. In November 2023, the NYDFS
adopted amendments to the NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation. The key changes include enhanced governance requirements, additional
controls, requirements for more regular risk and vulnerability assessments, as well as more robust incident planning, updated notification
requirements and updated training requirements.
While we employ robust and tested privacy and information security programs, as legislatures and regulators establish further laws and
regulations for addressing privacy and cybersecurity, we may need to amend our policies and adapt our internal procedures. See also
“Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax – Compliance with existing and emerging privacy laws and regulations could
result in increased compliance costs and/or lead to changes in business practices and policies, and any failure to protect the confidentiality
of personal information could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.” For information regarding cybersecurity risks, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – Our
information systems or the information systems of third parties on which we rely may experience interruptions, breaches in security and/
or a failure of disaster recovery systems that could result in a loss or disclosure of confidential information, damage to our reputation,
impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively and increased expenses.”
14
Securities, Broker-Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation
In addition to being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, some of our separate accounts as well as mutual funds that we sponsor
are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the shares of certain of these entities are
qualified for sale in some or all states and the District of Columbia. We also have subsidiaries that are registered as broker-dealers under
the Exchange Act and are subject to federal and state regulation, including, but not limited to, the Financial Industry Regulation
Authority’s (“FINRA”) net capital rules. In addition, we have subsidiaries that are registered investment advisers under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940. Agents, advisers and employees registered or associated with any of our investment adviser or broker-dealer
subsidiaries are subject to federal securities laws and to examination requirements and regulation by state and federal securities regulators.
Regulation also extends to various LNC entities that employ or control those individuals. The SEC and other governmental agencies and
self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities commissions in the U.S., have the power to conduct administrative proceedings
that can result in censure, fines, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or suspension and termination or limitation of the activities of the
regulated entity or its employees. In recent years, there has been increased scrutiny by these bodies across the industry, which has
included more extensive examinations, regular sweep inquiries and more detailed review of disclosure documents. Certain of our
subsidiaries have been, and may continue to be, the subject of such inquiries and examinations. For more information about regulatory
and litigation matters generally, see Note 18.
Standard of Conduct Regulation
As a result of overlapping efforts by the Department of Labor (“DOL”), the NAIC, individual states and the SEC to impose fiduciary-like
requirements in connection with the sale of annuities, life insurance policies and securities, which are each discussed in more detail below,
there have been a number of proposed or adopted changes to the laws and regulations that govern the conduct of our business and the
distribution of our products.
DOL Fiduciary Advice Rule
In 2016, the DOL released the DOL Fiduciary Rule, which became effective in 2017 and substantially expanded the range of activities
considered to be fiduciary investment advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal
Revenue Code. The DOL Fiduciary Rule was subsequently vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Fifth
Circuit”) in March 2018, and in June 2018, the Fifth Circuit issued a mandate stating that the original definition of “fiduciary,” including
the original five-part test, would apply going forward.
On October 31, 2023, the DOL again issued a proposed rule to redefine the meaning of “investment advice fiduciary” that would
substantially expand the range of activities considered to be fiduciary investment advice under ERISA. The proposal would also amend
the applicable prohibited transaction exemptions that allow investment advice fiduciaries to be paid compensation. If finalized as
proposed, these revisions would potentially apply to almost all sales to retirement plan participants and IRA investors, resulting in more
extensive disclosure and other compliance obligations as well as increased potential legal exposure for those involved in sales activities
that would be newly treated as fiduciary advice. After a public comment period, the proposed rule is expected to be finalized and go into
effect in the second or third quarter of 2024. It is uncertain at this time whether these changes would have a material impact on our
business.
SEC Regulation Best Interest
In 2019, the SEC approved “Regulation Best Interest,” including a new standard of conduct for broker-dealers under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), which requires broker-dealers and their representatives to act in the best interest of
retail customers when making recommendations of any securities transaction, without putting their financial interests ahead of the
interests of retail customers. The final rule includes guidance on what constitutes a “recommendation” and a definition of who would be
a “retail customer” in addition to provisions setting forth certain required disclosures, policies and procedures to identify conflicts of
interest, and customer-specific best interest obligations.
In addition, the SEC approved the use of a new disclosure document, the customer or client relationship summary, or Form CRS. Form
CRS is intended to provide retail investors with information about the nature of their relationship with their investment professional and
supplements other more detailed disclosures, including existing Form ADV for advisers and the new disclosures under Regulation Best
Interest for broker-dealers. Regulation Best Interest and Form CRS became effective as of September 10, 2019, with a transition period
for compliance through June 30, 2020, as of which date broker-dealers were required to be compliant.
Finally, the SEC issued interpretative guidance regarding an investment adviser’s fiduciary obligation under the Advisers Act. The
guidance indicates that investment advisers have a fiduciary duty to their clients that includes both a duty of care and a duty of loyalty and
further describes an investment adviser’s responsibilities under these fiduciary duties.
15
State Law Standard of Conduct Rules and Regulations
In addition to the SEC and DOL rules, the NAIC and several states, including Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey and New York, have
either enacted or proposed laws and regulations requiring investment advisers, broker-dealers and/or agents to meet a higher standard of
care and provide additional disclosures when providing advice to their clients. The recently enacted state laws and regulations have
resulted in, and upon adoption by other states such laws and regulations may result in, additional requirements related to the sale of our
products. Additional disclosure and other requirements could adversely affect our business by causing us to reevaluate or change certain
business practices or otherwise.
If the final DOL fiduciary rule or any additional new rules that are implemented are more onerous than Regulation Best Interest, or are
not coordinated with Regulation Best Interest, the impact on our business could be substantial. While we continue to monitor and
evaluate the various proposals, we cannot predict what other proposals may be made, or what new legislation or regulation may be
introduced or become law. Therefore, until such time as final rules or laws are in place, the potential impact on our business is uncertain.
Fixed Indemnity Excepted Benefits Legislation
On July 7, 2023, the DOL, Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Treasury issued a proposed tri-agency
federal rule that would change how hospital indemnity insurance and other fixed indemnity benefits qualify as “excepted benefits” under
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”). If finalized as proposed, the rule would change the current structure
of these products by only allowing hospital indemnity and other fixed indemnity policies to pay benefits in a fixed dollar amount per day
(or other time period) of hospitalization or illness, regardless of the actual or estimated amount of expenses incurred, services or items
received, severity of illness or injury experienced by a covered participant or beneficiary, or other characteristics particular to a course of
treatment received by a covered participant or beneficiary. Notably, the proposed rule provides that benefits cannot be paid on a per item
or per service basis to be an excepted benefit (which is a common plan benefit today). It is uncertain at this time whether these changes
could materially adversely impact our business, including sales of our supplemental health products.
Financial Reform Legislation
Since it was enacted in 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) has imposed
considerable reform in the financial services industry. The ongoing implementation continues to present challenges and uncertainties for
financial market participants. For instance, the Dodd-Frank Act and corresponding global initiatives imposed significant changes to the
regulation of derivatives transactions, which we use to mitigate many types of risk in our business. As we post and collect initial margin in
compliance with requirements that began in September 2021, we continue to evaluate the ways we are required to manage our derivatives
trading and the attendant liquidity requirements. For more information, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax –
Implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions
subject us to margin requirements, the impact of which remains uncertain.”
As financial services regulatory reform continues to evolve in the U.S. and abroad, and the marketplace continues to respond, the extent
to which our derivatives costs and strategies may change and the extent to which those changes may affect the range or pricing of our
products remains uncertain.
Additional provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act include, among other things, the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
to protect consumers of certain financial products; and changes to certain corporate governance rules. The Federal Insurance Office
established under the Dodd-Frank Act issues annually a wide-ranging report on the state of insurance regulation in the U.S., together with
a series of recommendations on ways to monitor and improve the regulatory environment. The ultimate impact of these
recommendations on our business is undeterminable at this time.
Other Federal Legislation
Tax Legislation
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net
income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of
2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. Both provisions became effective for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. Numerous forms of guidance on both provisions were published during 2023 by the
Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Treasury. While we have determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative
minimum tax for 2023, we will continue to evaluate the potential impact of this new alternative minimum tax on our business, results of
operations and financial condition in future periods.
16
We will continue to be actively engaged with policymakers including the Biden Administration to ensure the impacts of tax policy changes
on our business and our customers are well understood.
Outside of potential tax law changes, the uncertainty of federal funding and the future of the Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”)
program can have a substantial impact on the entire group benefit market because SSDI benefits are a direct offset to the benefits paid
under group disability policies. Congress alleviated some of this uncertainty by passing the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. As a result,
the 2023 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust
Funds, published by the Social Security Administration, projects that the SSDI reserves will not be depleted until 2034.
Health Care Reform Legislation
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was subsequently amended by
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. This legislation, as well as subsequent state and federal laws and regulations, includes
provisions that provide for additional taxes to help finance the cost of these reforms and substantive changes and additions to health care
and related laws, which could potentially impact some of our lines of business. We continue to monitor any efforts by the government to
repeal or replace provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the effect those efforts may have on our businesses.
Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 includes anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws as well as various regulations applicable
to broker-dealers and other financial services companies, including insurance companies. Financial institutions are required to collect
information regarding the identity of their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information
by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies and share information with other financial institutions. As a result, we are
required to maintain certain internal compliance practices, procedures and controls.
SECURE Act
In December 2019, President Trump signed into law the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (the “SECURE
Act”). Most of the provisions of the SECURE Act were effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2019. Among other
things, the provisions of the SECURE Act make it easier for employers to offer lifetime income options in defined contribution
retirement plans, facilitate the ability of small employers to offer access to retirement savings vehicles to their employees and increase
opportunities for workers to save by enhancing retirement plan automatic enrollment and escalation features. Congress continued to
build on the value created by the SECURE Act by passing SECURE Act 2.0 on December 29, 2022. This legislation also helps increase
plan adoption and savings opportunities, while also making the offering of lifetime income in plans more feasible. We believe that the
financial services industry will continue to benefit from the adoption of these legislative changes through continued or increased savings
in retirement and annuity solutions, including through the utilization of Lincoln’s suite of offerings.
ERISA Considerations
ERISA is a comprehensive federal statute that applies to U.S. employee benefit plans sponsored by private employers and labor unions.
Plans subject to ERISA include pension and profit-sharing plans and welfare plans, including health, life and disability plans. ERISA
provisions include reporting and disclosure rules, standards of conduct that apply to plan fiduciaries and prohibitions on transactions
known as “prohibited transactions,” such as conflict-of-interest transactions and certain transactions between a benefit plan and a party in
interest. ERISA also provides for a scheme of civil and criminal penalties and enforcement. Our insurance, asset management, plan
administrative services and other businesses provide services to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA, including services where we
may act as an ERISA fiduciary. In addition, because certain of our businesses provide products and services to ERISA plans, transactions
with those plans are subject to ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules, which may affect our ability to enter into transactions, or the terms
on which transactions may be entered into, with such plans, even if the business entering into the transaction is unrelated to the business
giving rise to party-in-interest status.
Environmental Considerations
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations apply to our ownership and operation of real property. Inherent in owning
and operating real property are the risks of hidden environmental liabilities and the costs of any required clean-up. Under the laws of
certain states, contamination of a property may give rise to a lien on the property to secure recovery of the costs of clean-up, which could
adversely affect our commercial mortgage lending. In several states, this lien has priority over the lien of an existing mortgage against
such property. In addition, in some states and under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), we may be liable, as an “owner” or “operator,” for costs of cleaning-up releases or threatened releases of
hazardous substances at a property mortgaged to us. We also risk environmental liability when we foreclose on a property mortgaged to
us. Federal legislation provides for a safe harbor from CERCLA liability for secured lenders that foreclose and sell the mortgaged real
estate, provided that certain requirements are met. However, there are circumstances in which actions taken could still expose us to
17
CERCLA liability. Application of various other federal and state environmental laws could also result in the imposition of liability on us
for costs associated with environmental hazards.
We routinely conduct environmental assessments for real estate we acquire for investment and before taking title through foreclosure to
real property collateralizing mortgages that we hold. Although unexpected environmental liabilities can always arise, based on these
environmental assessments and compliance with our internal procedures, we believe that any costs associated with compliance with
environmental laws and regulations or any clean-up of properties would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In addition, certain of our regulators and individual states have proposed or adopted, or may propose or adopt, environmental, social and
governance (“ESG”) rules or standards that would apply to our business. For example, in March 2022, the SEC proposed extensive rule
changes that would require companies to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports
filed with the SEC, and in October 2023, the Governor of California signed two bills into law that will require significant climate-related
disclosures (in some cases beyond the disclosures proposed by the SEC’s rule) by large entities doing business in that state. See “Item 1A.
Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax – Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from investors, customers, regulators and
other stakeholders regarding ESG matters may adversely affect our reputation or otherwise adversely impact our business and results of
operations” and “– Climate change and climate change regulation may adversely affect our investment portfolio and financial condition.”
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property. We
have implemented a patent strategy designed to protect innovative aspects of our products and processes which we believe distinguish us
from competitors. We currently own several issued U.S. patents.
We have an extensive portfolio of trademarks and service marks that we consider important in the marketing of our products and
services, including, among others, the trademarks of the Lincoln National and Lincoln Financial names, the Lincoln silhouette logo and
the combination of these marks. Trademark registrations may be renewed indefinitely subject to continued use and registration
requirements. We regard our trademarks as valuable assets in marketing our products and services and intend to protect them against
infringement and dilution.
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
As of December 31, 2023, we had a total of 11,024 employees, all based in the United States. Our mission is to help people to plan,
protect and retire with confidence by offering products and services across our four core businesses. We believe that every move we
make, including how we manage talent, shapes the future we share with our customers, communities and investors. Accordingly, each of
our employees has access to important resources designed to, among other things, help them improve their well-being, understand the
value of their work, develop their careers and thrive in a diverse and inclusive environment. From the moment our employees become
part of Lincoln, they’re empowered to “Be Lincoln” by living and acting with integrity, accountability and passion in their communities,
relationships and daily interactions with colleagues and clients. Our enterprise strategy is driven by continued focus on this unique
employee culture, including the following key areas:
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We believe that diversity, equity and inclusion are fundamental to our ability to deliver on our promise to help customers secure their
financial futures. Our diversity, equity and inclusion strategy is designed to deliver outcomes based on objectives and milestones in our
workplace, marketplace and the broader communities we serve. This strategy ensures that a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion
permeates every level of our organization as well as our interactions with partners and suppliers.
Our Board of Directors provides executive oversight of stated priorities, progress and strategic plans to support diversity, equity and
inclusion across the enterprise. Lincoln’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion begins at the highest level of management as a
formal expectation of our leaders and all employees, as part of our performance management process. In 2022, we launched an annual
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion conference available to all employees, featuring internal and external speakers and educational sessions.
Our employees are actively involved in our efforts to further diversity, equity and inclusion at the company and beyond, through the work
of our seven Business Resource Groups (“BRGs”). We maintain our BRG chapters nationwide across seven categories: African
American, Asian American, Latino, LGBTQ+, People with Disabilities, Veterans and Women. Each BRG is sponsored and supported
by senior leaders across the enterprise.
Employee Feedback and Employee Engagement
We actively listen to our employees in a variety of ways, including enterprise-wide and department-specific engagement surveys and focus
groups, and we gather feedback on an ongoing basis. The Company conducts a comprehensive, company-wide engagement survey every
two years, and often conducts department-specific pulse surveys in the alternate years, to inform our human resources strategy, measure
18
progress and adjust plans, as necessary. We focus on equipping our managers to foster employee development and strengthen their
voices. We support our managers through tools, resources and development programs to help them be the best leaders possible. We
have also created tools to help managers develop and execute on targeted action plans to address areas of opportunity for their work
groups.
Talent and Development
Our talent strategy supports Lincoln’s ability to identify, develop, engage, retain and reward the talent we need for success in a
competitive environment of constant change. Our employees work together with their managers to learn new skills, create an annual
individual development plan and shape their careers. Their collaborative efforts are backed by a variety of resources we make available,
which provide tools and resources to help employees discover, assess, plan and invest in their careers. In 2022, we launched Get
CAREER FIT, an enterprise-wide program to support all employees in creating a specific and targeted development plan. This boot-
camp style program includes expert advice, exercises and tools to clarify career aspirations and define specific steps to achieve success. As
part of the program, managers attend virtual instructor-led training to support their effectiveness in having development conversations
with their direct reports.
Our vision is to foster a premier learning culture, one that enhances leadership effectiveness, accelerates employee development and helps
drive business performance. Employees can access a range of learning and development opportunities including numerous instructor-led,
self-paced and curated courses. We have partnered with Harvard Business Publishing, a subsidiary of Harvard Business School, to offer
courses specifically designed for our mid-level employees and senior level leaders. All Lincoln employees can also access open online
courses offered through third-party providers, including TED@Work and Harvard Business Publishing. In 2022, we launched a new
Learner Experience Platform that serves as the front door to all of our learning content, courses and programs.
Total Rewards and Employee Well-Being
We invest in our employees’ futures by offering market-competitive compensation and a broad range of health and wellness programs as
well as retirement savings, financial health and protection plans. Our employees receive a personalized Your Total Rewards statement
that provides a comprehensive look at their direct and indirect compensation – the total investment that we make in them.
We offer paid time off and various flexible work arrangements, as part of a hybrid work model that was informed by direct feedback from
our workforce. In addition, we offer benefits and wellness programs focusing on the physical, emotional, social and financial well-being
of our employees. For eligible employees, such programs include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a subsidized medical plan with domestic partner eligibility, plus optional dental and vision, a health savings account with a company
contribution and a healthcare flexible spending account;
a well-being program that provides access to personal health coaches, health screenings and flu shots, discounts and reimbursements
for programs that promote health;
an employee assistance program (“EAP”) that provides counseling, work/life resources and tools to manage well-being;
paid parental leave and adoption assistance programs;
fertility, pregnancy and parenting support;
a dependent care flexible spending account;
access to Homework Connection which, provides one-on-one, on-demand homework help to students at no cost to employees;
dedicated Lincoln Financial Retirement Consultants to evaluate employee retirement readiness and help them map out ways to
improve their readiness; in addition to an independent financial wellness advisor for complete financial well-being assistance;
our employee 401(k) plan with a core company contribution, company matching contribution and other convenient features; and
hospital indemnity, accident and critical illness insurance coverages, short- and long-term disability plans and company-provided life
insurance.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other documents with the SEC under the Exchange Act. The SEC
maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including LNC, that
file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that we file with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
We also make available, free of charge, on or through our website, www.LincolnFinancial.com, our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, including exhibits, and all amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
The information contained on our website is not included as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report.
19
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are
not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem
immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially affected. In that case, the value of our securities could decline substantially.
Market Conditions
Weak conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally, both in the U.S.
and elsewhere around the world. Major central bank policy actions, inflation, recessionary conditions and political policy uncertainty
remain key challenges for markets and our business. These macro-economic conditions have in the past and may in the future have an
adverse effect on us given our credit and equity market exposure. In the event of extreme prolonged market events, such as the global
credit crisis and recession that occurred during 2008 and 2009, we could incur significant losses. Even in the absence of a market
downturn, we are exposed to substantial risk of loss and ratings downgrades due to market volatility.
Factors such as consumer spending, business investment, domestic and foreign government spending, the volatility and strength of the
capital markets, the potential for inflation or deflation and uncertainty over domestic and foreign government actions all affect the
business and economic environment and, ultimately, the amount and profitability of our business. In an economic downturn
characterized by inflation, recessionary conditions, higher unemployment, lower disposable income, lower corporate earnings, lower
business investment and lower consumer spending, the demand for our financial and insurance products could be adversely affected. In
addition, we have at times experienced, and in the future could experience, an elevated incidence of claims, and we could experience
changes in the rate of lapses or surrenders of policies or other changes in consumer behavior as a result of financial stress. Our contract
holders may choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop paying insurance premiums altogether. Adverse changes in the economy
have in the past and could in the future affect earnings negatively and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to
meet certain statutory requirements.
Interest rate fluctuations and/or a sustained period of low interest rates could negatively affect our profitability. Some of our products,
principally fixed annuities and UL, including linked-benefit UL, have interest rate guarantees that expose us to the risk that changes in
interest rates will reduce our spread, or the difference between the amounts that we are required to pay under the contracts and the
amounts we are able to earn on our general account investments intended to support our obligations under the contracts. Spreads are an
important component of our net income. Declines in our spread or instances where the returns on our general account investments are
not enough to support the interest rate guarantees on these products could have a material adverse effect on our businesses or results of
operations. In addition, low rates increase the cost of providing variable annuity living benefit guarantees, which could negatively affect
our variable annuity profitability.
In periods when interest rates are declining or remain at low levels, we may have to reinvest the cash we receive as interest or return of
principal on our investments in lower yielding instruments reducing our spread. Moreover, borrowers may prepay fixed-income
securities, commercial mortgages and mortgage-backed securities in our general account in order to borrow at lower market rates, which
exacerbates this risk. Lowering interest crediting rates helps to mitigate the effect of spread compression on some of our products.
However, because we are entitled to reset the interest rates on our fixed-rate annuities only at limited, pre-established intervals, and since
many of our contracts have guaranteed minimum interest or crediting rates, our spreads could still decrease. For additional information
on our guaranteed crediting rates, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk –
Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Falling Rates.”
Generally, a decline in market interest rates could also reduce our return on investments that do not support particular policy obligations.
During periods of sustained lower interest rates, our recorded policy liabilities may not be sufficient to meet future policy obligations and
may need to be strengthened, thereby reducing net income in the affected reporting period. Accordingly, declining interest rates or
sustained low-interest rates may materially affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and significantly reduce our
profitability. In addition, a decline in or sustained period of low market interest rates may make it more challenging for us to pass certain
asset adequacy tests related to statutory reserves, given the required conservatism of some of the regulations with which we must comply.
To meet these requirements, we may be required to post asset adequacy reserves, which, depending on the size of the reserve, could
materially affect our financial results.
20
Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract
withdrawals.
Throughout 2022 and into 2023, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate target range to combat inflation, with the most
recently announced increase in July 2023, when it set the range at 5.25% to 5.50%. In periods of increasing or high interest rates, such as
that we are experiencing currently, while higher interest rates will lead to higher yields on our asset portfolios, such increases in yield may
be more than offset by increases in crediting rates necessary to keep our interest-sensitive products competitive and potentially higher
borrowing costs, thus lowering our spreads. In such a scenario, we may have to accept a lower spread and thus lower profitability or face
a decline in sales and greater loss of existing contracts and related assets.
An increase in market interest rates could also have a material adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio and capital position,
for example, by decreasing the estimated fair values of the fixed-income securities that comprise a substantial portion of our investment
portfolio. This decline in the fair value of fixed-income securities can have an adverse impact on our capital position, particularly from a
GAAP perspective, as the decline in fair value of fixed-income securities may not be offset by a corresponding decline in the value of
liabilities due to higher interest rates. An increase in interest rates could also result in decreased fee income associated with a decline in
the value of variable annuity account balances invested in fixed-income funds. In addition, statutory capital requirements for certain fixed
annuity and single premium life insurance products incorporate stochastic projections that can result in increased capital requirements,
particularly as interest rates increase, which may affect our reported RBC ratio.
Increases in interest rates have in the past and may in the future, cause increased surrenders and withdrawals of insurance products. In
periods of high or increasing interest rates, policy loans and surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts
may increase as contract holders seek to buy products with perceived higher returns. This process may lead to a flow of cash out of our
businesses. These outflows may require investments to be sold at a time when the prices of those assets are lower because of the increase
in market interest rates, which may result in realized investment losses that reduce our capital position. A sudden demand among
consumers to change product types or withdraw funds could lead us to sell assets at a loss to meet the demand for funds. Furthermore,
unanticipated increases in withdrawals and terminations may accelerate amortization of our deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value
of business acquired (“VOBA”) assets, which would reduce net income.
Because the equity markets impact the profitability and expected profitability of many of our products, changes in equity markets may significantly affect our
business and profitability.
The fee income that we earn on certain products, including variable annuities, is based primarily upon account balances, and the fee
income that we earn on VUL policies is partially based upon account balances. Because strong equity markets result in higher account
balances, strong equity markets positively affect our net income through increased fee income. Conversely, a weakening of the equity
markets results in lower fee income and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and capital resources.
Changes in the equity markets, interest rates and/or volatility affect the profitability of our products with guaranteed benefits; therefore, such changes may have a
material adverse effect on our business and profitability.
Certain of our variable annuity and fixed indexed annuity products include optional guaranteed benefit riders, including GDB (variable
annuity only) and GLB riders. The fair value of these guaranteed benefit riders is impacted by changes in equity markets, interest rates,
volatility, foreign exchange rates and credit spreads. Accordingly, strong equity markets, increases in interest rates and decreases in
volatility will generally decrease the guaranteed benefit riders liability and would result in an increase to our earnings. Conversely, a
decrease in the equity markets along with a decrease in interest rates and an increase in volatility will generally result in an increase to the
guaranteed benefit riders liability and would result in a decrease to our earnings.
Certain of our VUL products include secondary guarantees. We accrue additional liabilities for these secondary guarantees, and these
liabilities are impacted by changes in equity markets. Accordingly, strong equity markets generally decrease these additional liabilities.
Conversely, a decrease in the equity markets will generally increase these additional liabilities. We use a hedge to partially mitigate the risk
related to equity market volatility and are evaluating other solutions, but there can be no guarantee that our hedge or other solutions will
be fully effective to mitigate this risk.
Our hedging strategies may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the carrying value of the guarantees on certain of our products, which could result in volatility
in our results of operations and financial condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries.
We use a variety of hedging strategies to mitigate the risks to the capital of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries associated with
certain guarantees on our variable products. However, the hedging strategies may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the
carrying value of these guarantees, as our hedging strategies hedge risks on a basis that does not correspond to their anticipated or actual
impact upon our results of operations or financial condition under GAAP. Changes from period to period in the valuation of these
guarantees, and in the amount of our obligations effectively hedged, will result in volatility in our results of operations and financial
21
condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. Estimates and assumptions we make in
connection with hedging activities may fail to reflect or correspond to our actual long-term exposure from our guarantees.
Legislative, Regulatory and Tax
Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation and in supervisory and enforcement policies may affect our insurance subsidiary capital requirements,
reduce our profitability, limit our growth or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to extensive supervision and regulation in the states in which we do business. The insurance
departments of the domiciliary states exercise principal regulatory jurisdiction over our insurance subsidiaries. The extent of regulation by
the states varies, but, in general, most jurisdictions have laws and regulations governing standards of solvency, adequacy of reserves,
reinsurance, capital adequacy, licensing of companies and agents to transact business, prescribing and approving policy forms, regulating
premium rates for some lines of business, prescribing the form and content of statutory financial statements and reports, regulating the
type and amount of investments permitted, and standards of business conduct. In addition, state insurance holding company laws impose
restrictions on certain inter-company transactions and limitations on the amount of dividends that insurance subsidiaries can pay.
State insurance regulators and the NAIC regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their
products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, sometimes lead to changes in business practices or
additional expense, statutory reserves and/or RBC requirements for the insurer and, thus, could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. For example, the NAIC is considering modifications to the economic scenario generator
used to calculate annuity and life reserves according to the Valuation Manual (e.g., VM-20 and VM-21) and the required capital for these
annuity and life contracts, as well as certain fixed annuity and single premium life insurance products, which could affect the level and
volatility of statutory reserves and required capital for products in scope. The economic scenarios are a key input in the statutory reserve
and required capital calculations for certain products, such as variable annuities. If the NAIC adopts an economic scenario generator that
produces scenarios with characteristics that differ significantly from what the current economic scenario generator prescribed in these
calculations would produce under the same circumstances, this could have a significant impact on the statutory reserves and required
capital for products in scope upon adoption as well as affect how the statutory reserves and required capital for these products respond to
changes in market conditions. We are monitoring all potential changes and evaluating the potential impact they could have on our
product offerings and financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation” for a
discussion of additional changes under consideration and recent changes implemented by the NAIC, including changes to principles-
based reserving and changes to actuarial guidelines, and the impact of such changes on our business.
Although we endeavor to maintain all required licenses and approvals, our businesses may not fully comply with the wide variety of
applicable laws and regulations or the relevant authority’s interpretation of the laws and regulations, which may change from time to time.
Also, regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or revoke licenses and approvals. If we do not have the
requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could
preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities or impose substantial fines. Further, insurance
regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to issue orders of supervision, which permit such authorities to supervise the
business and operations of an insurance company. As of December 31, 2023, no state insurance regulatory authority had imposed on us
any material fines or revoked or suspended any of our licenses to conduct insurance business in any state or issued an order of
supervision with respect to our insurance subsidiaries that would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
Compliance with existing and emerging privacy laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs and/or lead to changes in business practices and
policies, and any failure to protect the confidentiality of personal information could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Complying with the numerous privacy laws and regulations to which we are subject and other existing, emerging and changing privacy
requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices and policies. Non-compliance could
result in monetary penalties or significant legal liability. For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Privacy and
Cybersecurity Regulation.”
Many of the employees and associates who conduct our business have access to, and routinely process, personal information (including
confidential information from consumers, clients and individuals with whom we have a business relationship) through a variety of media,
including information technology systems. Although we rely on various internal processes and controls to protect the confidentiality of
personal information that is accessible to, or in the possession of, our employees and our associates, including service providers,
distribution partners, independent agents and others, a breach in the security of our information technology systems, a breach in the
security of our associate’s information technology systems, or intentional or unintentional actions by an employee or associate could result
in the disclosure or misappropriation of individuals’ personal information. State and federal laws and regulations also require us to
disclose our data collection and sharing practices to individuals who interact with us and to provide certain individuals with access to
22
certain pieces of their personal information, the right to request correction of their information, the right to request deletion of their
information, and the right to opt out of certain tracking, sharing and processing. We rely on various internal processes and associates to
report our practices accurately and to respond appropriately to consumer and customer requests. We cannot predict what, if any, actions
from U.S. state and federal regulators may be taken if we fail to maintain these processes or if we or our associates fail to comply with our
policies or procedures. If we or our associates fail to comply with applicable processes, policies, procedures and controls,
misappropriation or intentional or unintentional inappropriate disclosure or misuse of individuals’ personal information, or violation of
applicable state or federal laws, could occur. Such an event could materially damage our reputation or lead to regulatory, civil or criminal
investigations and penalties, which, in turn, could have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
See also “Operational Matters – Our information systems or the information systems of third parties on which we rely may experience
interruptions, breaches in security and/or a failure of disaster recovery systems that could result in a loss or disclosure of confidential
information, damage to our reputation, impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively and increased expense,” below.
Compliance with existing and emerging rules and regulations governing the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) could result in increased compliance costs and/or
lead to changes in business practices and policies, and challenges with properly managing the use of AI could result in reputational harm, competitive harm and
legal liability.
We analyze personal information to better manage our business. There has been increased scrutiny, including from U.S. state and federal
regulators, regarding the use of artificial intelligence on large data sets for activities such as price optimization. In August 2020, members
of the NAIC unanimously adopted guiding principles on artificial intelligence to inform and articulate general expectations for businesses,
professionals and stakeholders across the insurance industry as they implement artificial intelligence tools to facilitate operations. More
recently, in December 2023, the NAIC adopted a model bulletin on the use of AI by insurers, which was intended to remind insurance
carriers that decisions impacting consumers that are made or supported by advanced analytical and computational technologies, including
AI, must comply with all applicable insurance laws and regulations, including unfair trade practices. The bulletin also sets forth state
insurance regulators’ expectations on how insurers should govern the use of such technologies by or on behalf of the insurer to make or
support such decisions. Additionally, in October 2023, the White House issued an Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy
Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, which directs federal agencies and departments to create standards and regulations for the
use or oversight of artificial intelligence. We cannot predict how existing and emerging guidance, rules and regulations governing the use
of AI will be interpreted or applied, or what, if any, actions may be taken regarding AI, but any applicable regulations and limitations
could result in increased compliance costs and/or lead to changes in business practices and policies, which could have a material impact
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, if the data sets, processes or outputs that AI systems produce are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, unfairly biased,
lacking in transparency or explainability, or do not meet evolving legal requirements, our business, financial condition and results of
operations may be adversely affected. AI also presents emerging ethical issues and if our use of AI becomes controversial, we may
experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm or legal liability. These same risks may affect us if a third-party service provider
uses AI. Our use or our service provider’s use of AI systems could also result in cybersecurity incidents that may involve the personal
information of end users of such applications. Any such cybersecurity incidents could adversely affect our reputation and business,
financial condition and results of operations. For additional information regarding cybersecurity risks, see “Operational Matters – Our
information systems or the information systems of third parties on which we rely may experience interruptions, breaches in security and/
or a failure of disaster recovery systems that could result in a loss or disclosure of confidential information, damage to our reputation,
impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively and increased expenses,” below.
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from investors, customers, regulators and other stakeholders regarding ESG matters may adversely affect our
reputation or otherwise adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Certain existing or potential investors, customers, regulators and other stakeholders evaluate our business or other practices according to
a variety of ESG standards and expectations. Certain of our regulators have proposed or adopted, or may propose or adopt, ESG rules
or standards that would apply to our business. For example, in March 2022, the SEC proposed extensive rule changes that would require
companies to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports filed with the SEC, and in
October 2023, the Governor of California signed two bills into law that will require significant climate-related disclosures (in some cases
beyond the disclosures proposed by the SEC’s rule) by large entities doing business in that state. ESG-related rules, guidance and policies
may impose additional costs, cause changes to our corporate governance and risk management practices and expose the industry to new
or additional risks.
Our practices may be judged by ESG standards that are continually evolving and not always clear. Prevailing ESG standards and
expectations may also reflect contrasting or conflicting values or agendas. We may fail to meet our ESG-related commitments or targets,
and our policies and processes to evaluate and manage ESG standards in coordination with other business priorities may not prove
completely effective or satisfy investors, customers, regulators or others. We may face adverse regulatory, investor, customer, media or
public scrutiny leading to business, reputational or legal challenges, which could adversely affect our reputation or otherwise adversely
affect our business and results of operations, including but not limited to the ability to sell products, policyholder retention and increased
cost of financing.
23
Federal or state regulatory actions could result in substantial fines, penalties or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities that could materially adversely
affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our broker-dealer and investment adviser subsidiaries as well as our variable annuities and variable life insurance products are subject to
regulation and supervision by the SEC, FINRA and/or state securities regulators. Applicable laws and regulations generally grant
supervisory agencies and self-regulatory organizations broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict the subsidiaries
from carrying on their businesses in the event that they fail to comply with such laws and regulations. The foregoing regulatory or
governmental bodies, as well as the DOL and others, have the authority to review our products and business practices and those of our
agents, advisers, registered representatives, associated persons and employees. These regulatory or governmental bodies may bring
regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. In recent
years, there has been increased scrutiny by these bodies across the industry, which has included more extensive examinations, regular
sweep inquiries and more detailed review of disclosure documents. Certain of our subsidiaries have been, and may continue to be, the
subject of these examinations and inquiries. These or future regulatory actions could result in substantial fines, penalties or prohibitions
or restrictions on our business activities that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Changes to laws or regulations could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and may result in additional disclosure and other
requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products and services, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
On July 7, 2023, the DOL, Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Treasury issued a proposed tri-agency
federal rule that would change how hospital indemnity insurance and other fixed indemnity benefits qualify as “excepted benefits” under
HIPAA. If finalized as proposed, the rule would change the current structure of these products by only allowing hospital indemnity and
other fixed indemnity policies to pay benefits in a fixed dollar amount per day (or other time period) of hospitalization or illness,
regardless of the actual or estimated amount of expenses incurred, services or items received, severity of illness or injury experienced by a
covered participant or beneficiary, or other characteristics particular to a course of treatment received by a covered participant or
beneficiary. Notably, the proposed rule provides that benefits cannot be paid on a per item or per service basis to be an excepted benefit
(which is a common plan benefit today). While it is uncertain at this time whether these changes could have a material impact on our
business, finalization of the rule in its proposed form could adversely impact sales of our supplemental health products, which could
adversely affect our business., results of operation or financial condition.
On October 31, 2023, the DOL again issued a proposed rule to redefine the meaning of “investment advice fiduciary” that would
substantially expand the range of activities considered to be fiduciary investment advice under ERISA. The proposal would also amend
the applicable prohibited transaction exemptions that allow investment advice fiduciaries to be paid compensation. If finalized as
proposed, these revisions would potentially apply to almost all sales to retirement plan participants and IRA investors, resulting in more
extensive disclosure and other compliance obligations as well as increased potential legal exposure for those involved in sales activities
that would be newly treated as fiduciary advice. After a public comment period, the proposed rule is expected to be finalized and go into
effect in the second or third quarter of 2024. It is uncertain at this time whether these changes would have a material impact on our
business.
In 2019, the SEC approved “Regulation Best Interest,” including a new standard of conduct for broker-dealers under the Exchange Act,
which requires broker-dealers and their representatives to act in the best interest of retail customers when making recommendations of
any securities transaction, without putting their financial interests ahead of the interests of retail customers. Among other things, the final
rule includes provisions setting forth certain required disclosures, policies and procedures to identify conflicts of interest, and customer-
specific best interest obligations. Regulation Best Interest became effective as of September 10, 2019, with a transition period for
compliance through June 30, 2020, as of which date broker-dealers were required to be compliant.
In addition to the SEC and DOL rules, the NAIC and several states have either enacted or proposed laws and regulations requiring
investment advisers, broker-dealers and/or agents to meet a higher standard of care and provide additional disclosures when providing
advice to their clients, resulting in additional requirements related to the sale of our products. For more information on these regulations,
see “Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Standard of Conduct Regulation.”
Additional disclosure and other requirements related to standards of conduct could adversely affect our business by causing us to
reevaluate or change certain business practices or otherwise. If the final DOL fiduciary rule or any additional new rules that are
implemented are more onerous than Regulation Best Interest, or are not coordinated with Regulation Best Interest, the impact on our
business could be substantial. While we continue to monitor and evaluate the various proposals, we cannot predict what other proposals
may be made, or what new legislation or regulation may be introduced or become law. Therefore, until such time as final rules or laws are
in place, the potential impact on our business is uncertain.
Changes in U.S. federal income tax law could impact our tax costs and the products that we sell.
Changes in tax laws or interpretations of such laws could increase our corporate taxes and negatively impact our results of operations and
financial condition. Tax authorities may enact changes in tax law or issue new regulations or other pronouncements that could increase
24
our current tax burden and impose new taxes on our business. Guidance on previously enacted tax law changes could impact our
interpretations of existing law and also have an impact on our business. In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed
by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate
alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after
December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. This provision is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. While we have
determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative minimum tax for 2023, we will continue to evaluate the
potential impact of this new alternative minimum tax on our business, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
Legal and regulatory actions are inherent in our businesses and could result in financial losses or harm our businesses.
We are, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our business. Pending legal and
regulatory actions include proceedings relating to aspects of our businesses and operations that are specific to us and proceedings that are
typical of the businesses in which we operate. Some of these legal proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of
complainants. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary
damages. Substantial legal liability in these or future legal or regulatory actions could have a material financial effect or cause significant
harm to our reputation, which in turn could materially harm our business prospects. See Note 18 for a description of legal and regulatory
proceedings and actions.
Climate change and climate change regulation may adversely affect our investment portfolio and financial condition.
Climate change and climate change regulation may affect the prospects of companies and other entities whose securities we hold or our
willingness to continue to hold their securities. Climate change could also impact our counterparties and other third parties, including,
among others, reinsurers and derivatives counterparties. Additionally, the value of investments, including real estate investments we hold,
and the broader market indices could be adversely affected, which may impact our product profitability and the ability to write new
business. Although we have performed, and will continue to perform, climate change scenario analyses with respect to the investments in
portions of our general account, we cannot accurately predict the long-term impacts on us or our portfolio from climate change or related
regulation.
Implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions subjects us to margin
requirements, the impact of which remains uncertain.
The Dodd-Frank Act, and corresponding global initiatives, including the European Market Infrastructure Regulation implemented in
2012, imposed significant changes to the regulation of derivatives transactions, which we use to mitigate many types of risk in our
business. The European Market Infrastructure Regulation and matching U.K. rules impose initial margin requirements that largely
correspond to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. As an exception, our Europe-based swap providers may be subject to additional
margin requirements with respect to equity options beginning in 2024, which may require us to post and collect additional initial margin.
Until the application of initial margin requirements is complete, the impact of these provisions on liquidity and capital resources remains
uncertain.
Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our financial
statements.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP as identified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”). From time to time, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or guidance
that are incorporated into the FASB ASC. It is possible that future accounting standards we are required to adopt could change the
current accounting treatment that we apply to the consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our domestic insurance subsidiaries are subject to SAP and specific state insurance regulations. Any changes in the method
for calculating reserves for our annuity and life insurance products under SAP or applicable state insurance regulations may result in
increased reserve requirements.
The NAIC also adopts changes to its regulations from time to time, which, depending on the scope of the change, could materially affect
our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation.”
Anti-takeover provisions could delay, deter or prevent our change in control, even if the change in control would be beneficial to LNC shareholders.
We are an Indiana corporation subject to Indiana state law. Certain provisions of Indiana law could interfere with or restrict takeover
bids or other change in control events affecting us. Under Indiana law, directors may, in considering the best interests of a corporation,
consider the effects of any action on shareholders, employees, suppliers and customers of the corporation and the communities in which
offices and other facilities are located, and other factors the directors consider pertinent. One statutory provision prohibits, except under
25
specified circumstances, LNC from engaging in any business combination with any shareholder who owns 10% or more of our common
stock (which shareholder, under the statute, would be considered an “interested shareholder”) for a period of five years following the time
that such shareholder became an interested shareholder, unless such business combination is approved by the Board of Directors prior to
such person becoming an interested shareholder.
In addition to the anti-takeover provisions of Indiana law, there are other factors that may delay, deter or prevent our change in control.
As an insurance holding company, we are regulated as an insurance holding company and are subject to the insurance holding company
acts of the states in which our insurance company subsidiaries are domiciled. The insurance holding company acts and regulations restrict
the ability of any person to obtain control of an insurance company without prior regulatory approval. Under those statutes and
regulations, without such approval (or an exemption), no person may acquire any voting security of a domestic insurance company, or an
insurance holding company which controls an insurance company, or merge with such a holding company, if as a result of such
transaction such person would “control” the insurance holding company or insurance company. “Control” is generally defined as the
direct or indirect power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person and is presumed to exist if a person
directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of the voting securities of another person.
Liquidity and Capital Position
Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.
In the event that our current sources of liquidity do not satisfy our needs, we may have to seek additional financing. The availability of
additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the volume of trading
activities, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as the possibility
that customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects if we incur large investment
losses or if the level of our business activity decreases due to a market downturn. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if
regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Ratings” in the MD&A
for a description of our credit ratings. Our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able
to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may also limit our access to capital required to operate our business,
most significantly our insurance operations. Such market conditions may limit our ability to replace, in a timely manner, maturing
liabilities; satisfy statutory capital requirements; generate fee income and market-related revenue to meet liquidity needs; and access the
capital necessary to grow our business. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter term securities than we prefer or
bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. Our results of
operations, financial condition, cash flows and statutory capital position could be materially adversely affected by disruptions in the
financial markets.
Because we are a holding company with no direct operations, the inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us in sufficient amounts would harm our ability to
meet our obligations.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions related to the transfer of funds and payment
of dividends to LNC, including statutory limitations on the amount of dividends that can be paid. In addition, payments of dividends and
advances or repayment of funds to us by our insurance subsidiaries are restricted by the applicable laws of their respective jurisdictions
requiring that our insurance subsidiaries hold a specified amount of minimum reserves in order to meet future obligations on their
outstanding policies. In order to meet their claims-paying obligations, our insurance subsidiaries regularly monitor their reserves to ensure
we hold sufficient amounts to cover actual or expected contract and claims payments. At times, we may determine that reserves in excess
of the minimum may be needed to ensure sufficiency. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of
Liquidity and Capital – Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends” in the MD&A for additional information regarding these restrictions and
requirements.
Changes in, or reinterpretations of, these laws can constrain the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds
to us in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to meet our debt obligations and corporate expenses. Requiring our insurance
subsidiaries to hold additional reserves has the potential to constrain their ability to pay dividends to the holding company.
The earnings of our insurance subsidiaries impact our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus. Lower earnings constrain the growth in our
insurance subsidiaries’ capital, and therefore, can constrain the payment of dividends and advances or repayment of funds to us. In
addition, the amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus they hold
to maintain their financial strength ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our
businesses. As a result, to the extent our subsidiaries are unable or are materially restricted from being able to pay dividends to us in
sufficient amounts, our ability to meet our obligations could be materially affected.
26
A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.
In any particular year, statutory surplus amounts and RBC ratios may increase or decrease depending on a variety of factors, including the
amount of statutory income or losses generated by our insurance subsidiaries (which itself is sensitive to equity market and credit market
conditions), the amount of additional capital our insurance subsidiaries must hold to support business growth, changes in reserving
requirements, such as principles-based reserving, our inability to obtain reserve relief, changes in equity market levels, the value of certain
fixed-income and equity securities in our investment portfolio, the value of certain derivative instruments that do not get hedge
accounting treatment, changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, as well as changes to the NAIC RBC formulas. The
RBC ratio is also affected by the product mix of the in-force book of business (i.e., the amount of business without guarantees is not
subject to the same level of reserves as the business with guarantees). In extreme scenarios of equity market declines, the amount of
additional statutory reserves that we are required to hold for our VUL insurance guarantees and variable annuity guarantees may increase
at a rate greater than the rate of change of the markets. Increases in reserves reduce the statutory surplus used in calculating our RBC
ratios. Most of these factors are outside of our control. Our credit and insurer financial strength ratings are significantly influenced by
the statutory surplus amounts and RBC ratios of our insurance company subsidiaries. The RBC ratio of LNL is an important factor in
the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries. For example, shortly after our announcement in
November 2022 that we expected decreases to our statutory capital and RBC ratio by the end of 2022, AM Best downgraded LNC’s
short- and long-term issuer credit ratings and the financial strength ratings of LNL and LLANY, due in part to a decrease in our capital,
and revised its ratings outlooks from stable to negative for LNC and FPP, while Moody’s and Fitch revised their short- and long-term
issuer credit and financial strength ratings outlooks for LNC and its insurance subsidiaries from stable to negative. Further, in October
2023, Moody’s downgraded LNC’s long-term issuer credit rating and the financial strength ratings of LNL, LLANY and FPP, due in part
to the decrease in our capital resulting from our third quarter 2022 annual assumption review, and revised its ratings outlook from
negative to stable for LNC and its insurance subsidiaries. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” and “Liquidity and Capital
Resources – Ratings” in the MD&A for a full description of our ratings and ratings outlooks, including our S&P ratings and outlooks,
certain of which were also downgraded or revised in November 2022 prior to our above-referenced announcement.
In addition, rating agencies may implement changes to their internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of
statutory capital we must hold in order to maintain our current ratings. For example, in November 2023, S&P implemented changes to
its insurer RBC capital adequacy model, which could increase the amount of statutory capital we are required to hold in certain scenarios
in order to maintain our current ratings. To the extent that our statutory capital resources are deemed to be insufficient to maintain a
particular rating by one or more rating agencies, we may seek to raise additional capital through public or private equity or debt financing,
which may be on terms not as favorable as in the past.
Alternatively, if we were not to raise additional capital in such a scenario, either at our discretion or because we were unable to do so, our
financial strength and credit ratings might be downgraded by one or more rating agencies. For more information on risks regarding our
ratings, see “Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products,
increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” below.
An inability to access our credit facilities could result in a reduction in our liquidity and lead to downgrades in our credit and financial strength ratings.
We rely on our credit facilities as a potential source of liquidity. We also use the credit facilities as a potential backstop to provide
statutory reserve credit to our insurance subsidiaries, including LNL. If we were unable to access our facility in such circumstances, it
could materially impact LNL’s capital position. The availability of these facilities could be critical to our credit and financial strength
ratings and our ability to meet our obligations as they come due in a market when alternative sources of credit are tight.
In addition, our failure to comply with the covenants in the credit facilities or fulfill the conditions to borrowings, or the failure of lenders
to fund their lending commitments (whether due to insolvency, illiquidity or other reasons) in the amounts provided for under the terms
of the facilities, would restrict our ability to access these credit facilities when needed and, consequently, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Assumptions and Estimates
As a result of changes in assumptions, estimates and methods in calculating reserves, our reserves for future policy benefits and claims related to our current and
future business as well as businesses we may acquire in the future may prove to be inadequate.
We establish and carry, as a liability, reserves based on estimates of how much we will need to pay for future benefits and claims. For our
insurance products, we calculate these reserves based on many assumptions and estimates, including, but not limited to, estimated
premiums we will receive over the assumed life of the policies, the timing of the events covered by the insurance policies, the lapse rate of
the policies, the amount of benefits or claims to be paid and the investment returns on the assets we purchase with the premiums we
receive.
27
The sensitivity of our statutory reserves and surplus established for our variable annuity base contracts and riders and VUL contracts to
changes in the equity markets will vary depending on the magnitude of the decline. The sensitivity will be affected by the level of account
balances relative to the level of guaranteed amounts, product design and reinsurance. Statutory reserves for variable annuities depend
upon the cumulative equity market impacts on the business in force, and therefore, result in non-linear relationships with respect to the
level of equity market performance within any reporting period.
The assumptions and estimates we use in connection with establishing and carrying our reserves are inherently uncertain. Accordingly,
we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amount or the timing of the payment of actual benefits and claims or whether the assets
supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level we assume prior to payment of benefits or claims. If our actual experience is
different from our assumptions or estimates, our reserves may prove to be inadequate in relation to our estimated future benefits and
claims, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increases in reserves have a negative
effect on income from operations in the quarter incurred and could also have a negative impact in future periods. For example, in the
third quarter of 2022, we incurred a substantial charge related to the company’s annual review of reserve assumptions, related primarily to
updated lapse assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees in response to emerging experience, combined with recently
validated external industry perspectives. This charge also impacted our statutory capital in the fourth quarter of 2022. For more
information on our annual assumption review, including the most recent review conducted in the third quarter of 2023, see “Summary of
Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” in MD&A. For information on impacts to our statutory capital, see
“Liquidity and Capital Resources – Overview – Capital” in the MD&A.
We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred income tax assets.
If our businesses do not perform well and/or their estimated fair values decline or the price of our common stock does not increase, we
may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against the deferred income tax asset,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. For example, during the third quarter of
2022, we recorded goodwill impairment of $634 million related to our Life Insurance segment. Future reviews of goodwill could result in
an impairment of goodwill, and such write-downs could have a material adverse effect on our net income and book value, although they
would not affect the statutory capital of our insurance subsidiaries. For more information on goodwill, see “Summary of Critical
Accounting Estimates – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the MD&A and Note 9.
If, based on available information, including about the performance of a business and its ability to generate future capital gains, we
determine that it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset will not be realized, then a valuation allowance must be
established with a corresponding charge to net income. Such valuation allowance could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition. For more information on our deferred income tax assets, see Note 23.
The determination of the amount of allowance for credit losses and impairments taken on our investments is highly subjective and could materially impact our
results of operations or financial condition.
The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments varies by investment type and is based upon our periodic evaluation and
assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as
conditions change and new information becomes available. Management updates its evaluations regularly and reflects changes in
allowances and impairments in operations as such evaluations are revised. There can be no assurance that our management has accurately
assessed the level of impairments taken and allowances reflected in our financial statements. Furthermore, additional impairments may
need to be taken or allowances provided for in the future. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments or allowances.
With respect to unrealized losses, we establish deferred tax assets for the tax benefit we may receive in the event that losses are realized.
The realization of significant realized losses could result in an inability to recover the tax benefits and may result in the establishment of
valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets. Realized losses or impairments may have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations and financial condition. See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Investments” in the MD&A for additional
information.
Changes to our valuation of investments and our methodologies, estimations and assumptions could harm our results of operations or financial condition.
During periods of market disruption or rapidly-changing market conditions, such as significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly
widening credit spreads or illiquidity, or infrequent trading, or when market data is limited, our investments may become less liquid and
we may base our valuations on less-observable and more subjective inputs, assumptions, or methods that may result in estimated fair
values that significantly vary by period, and may exceed the investment’s sale price. Decreases in the estimated fair value of our securities
may harm our results of operations or financial condition. See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Investments” in the MD&A
for additional information.
28
Significant adverse mortality experience may result in the loss of, or higher prices for, reinsurance, which could adversely affect our profitability.
We reinsure a portion of the mortality risk on fully underwritten, newly issued, individual life insurance contracts. We regularly review
retention limits for continued appropriateness, and they may be changed in the future. In the event that we experience adverse mortality
or morbidity experience, a significant portion of that is reimbursed by our reinsurers. Prolonged or severe adverse mortality or morbidity
experience could result in increased reinsurance costs and, ultimately, reinsurers being unwilling to offer future coverage. If we are unable
to maintain our current level of reinsurance or obtain new reinsurance protection at comparable rates to what we are paying currently, we
may have to accept an increase in our net exposures or revise our pricing to reflect higher reinsurance premiums or both. If this were to
occur, we may be exposed to reduced profitability and cash flow strain or we may not be able to price new business at competitive rates.
Pandemics and other catastrophes have impacted, and may in the future, adversely impact liabilities for contract holder claims.
Our insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality and morbidity, such as that caused by a pandemic, an act of
terrorism, natural disaster or other event that causes a large number of deaths, injuries or illnesses. In addition, in our group insurance
operations, an event that affects the workplace of one or more of our group insurance customers, such as a pandemic or a natural
disaster, could also cause a significant loss due to mortality or morbidity claims. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in the
first quarter of 2020, we experienced higher mortality claim payments due to an elevation in claim incidence. In addition, we experienced
an increase in short-term and long-term disability claims related to the pandemic that negatively impacted our earnings. We expect
COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends. The likelihood, timing or severity of a future pandemic or other
catastrophe cannot be predicted. Additionally, the impact of climate change has caused, and may continue to cause, changes in weather
patterns, resulting in more severe and more frequent natural disasters such as forest fires, hurricanes, tornados, floods and storm surges.
Future pandemics or other catastrophic events could cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any period and,
depending on their severity, could also materially and adversely affect our financial condition.
The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in the area affected by the event and
the severity of the event. Pandemics, natural disasters and man-made catastrophes, including terrorism, may produce significant damage
in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Although our investment, product and physical exposures are diversified (e.g.,
geographically), reducing the enterprise impact to catastrophic events, claims resulting from natural or man-made catastrophic events
could cause substantial volatility in our financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce our profitability or harm
our financial condition. Also, catastrophic events could harm the financial condition of our reinsurers and thereby increase the
probability of default on reinsurance recoveries. Accordingly, our ability to write new business could also be affected.
Consistent with industry practice and accounting standards, we establish liabilities for claims arising from a catastrophe only after
assessing the probable losses arising from the event. We cannot be certain that the liabilities we have established or applicable reinsurance
will be adequate to cover actual claim liabilities, and a catastrophic event or multiple catastrophic events could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Operational Matters
We may not realize or sustain all of the benefits we expect from the Spark Initiative, our investments associated with the initiative could be greater than expected,
and our efforts with respect to the initiative may result in disruption of our businesses or distraction of our management and employees, which could have a material
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In November 2021, we formally communicated a new expense savings initiative, the Spark Initiative, focused on driving efficiencies
throughout all aspects of our business, from leveraging automation to simplifying and improving process efficiency. In addition, this
program is targeting benefits beyond cost savings, including improving the way we work by focusing on reskilling and upskilling our
valuable employee base. The multi-year program has and will continue to require significant investment and resource prioritization. If we
do not successfully manage and execute the Spark Initiative, or if the program is inadequate or ineffective, we may not achieve all of the
cost savings we expect from the initiative, or projected savings may be delayed or not sustained. In addition, our investments related to
the program may be greater than expected, and the work we are undertaking with respect to the initiative could result in disruption of our
business or distraction of our management and employees. If any of these risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially affected.
Our enterprise risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could negatively affect our businesses or
result in losses.
Our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective. Many of our methods of managing risk and
exposures are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these
methods may not predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate, such as the risk of
pandemics causing a large number of deaths. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding
markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that is publicly available or otherwise accessible to us, which may not always be
29
accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things,
policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may
not be fully effective.
We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.
We follow the insurance practice of reinsuring with other insurance and reinsurance companies a portion of the risks under the policies
written by our insurance subsidiaries (known as “ceding”). As of December 31, 2023, we ceded $1.1 trillion of life insurance in force to
reinsurers for reinsurance protection. Although reinsurance does not discharge our subsidiaries from their primary obligation to pay
contract holders for losses insured under the policies we issue, reinsurance does make the assuming reinsurer liable to the insurance
subsidiaries for the reinsured portion of the risk. For more information regarding our reinsurance arrangements and exposure, see
“Reinsurance” in the MD&A and Note 8.
The collectability of reinsurance is largely a function of the solvency of the individual reinsurers. We perform due diligence on all
reinsurers, including, but not limited to, a review of creditworthiness prior to entering into any reinsurance transaction, and we review our
reinsurers on an ongoing basis to monitor credit ratings. To support balances due and allow reserve credit when reinsurance is obtained
from reinsurers not authorized to transact business in the applicable jurisdictions, we also require assets in trust, LOCs or other
acceptable collateral. Despite these measures, the insolvency, inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of a
reinsurance contract by a large reinsurer or multiple reinsurers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. For information on reinsurance-related credit losses, see Note 8.
Reinsurers also may attempt to increase rates with respect to our existing reinsurance arrangements. The ability of our reinsurers to
increase rates depends upon the terms of each reinsurance contract. Some of our reinsurance contracts contain provisions that limit the
reinsurer’s ability to increase rates on in-force business. An increase in reinsurance rates may affect the profitability of our insurance
business. Additionally, such a rate increase could result in our recapture of the business, which may result in a need for additional
reserves and increase our exposure to claims. In recent years, we have faced a number of rate increase actions on in-force business, and
reinsurers have initiated, and may in the future initiate, legal proceedings against us. Our management of these rate increase actions and
the outcomes of legal proceedings have not to date had a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition, but we can
make no assurance regarding the impact of future rate increase actions or outcomes of legal proceedings. See Note 18 for a description of
reinsurance-related actions.
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our business.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees. Intense competition exists for employees with
demonstrated ability, and the competition for talent has increased in recent years. In addition, opportunities to work remotely have
expanded the reach of recruiters and options for employees. As a result of this competition, we may be unable to hire or retain the
qualified employees we need to support our business. Further, the unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key employees
could have a material adverse effect on our operations due to their skills, knowledge of our business, their years of industry experience
and the potential difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement employees. We compete with other financial institutions primarily
on the basis of our products, compensation, support services and financial condition. Sales in our businesses and our results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in attracting and retaining employees,
including financial advisers, wholesalers and other employees, as well as independent distributors of our products.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our intellectual property, which represents a diversion of resources that may be significant
and may not prove successful. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce the protection of our
intellectual property assets could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to compete.
We also may be subject to costly litigation in the event that another party alleges our operations or activities infringe upon another party’s
intellectual property rights. If we were found to have infringed a third-party patent or other intellectual property rights, we could incur
substantial liability, and in some circumstances could be enjoined from providing certain products or services to our customers, or
alternatively could be required to enter into costly licensing arrangements with third parties, all of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our information systems or the information systems of third parties on which we rely may experience interruptions, breaches in security and/or a failure of disaster
recovery systems that could result in a loss or disclosure of confidential information, damage to our reputation, impairment of our ability to conduct business
effectively and increased expense.
Our information systems are critical to the operation of our business. We collect, process, maintain, retain and distribute large amounts
of personal financial and health information and other confidential and sensitive data about individuals with whom we interact in the
30
ordinary course of our business. Our business therefore depends on the public’s willingness to entrust us with their personal information.
Any failure, interruption or breach in security could result in disruptions to our critical systems and adversely affect these relationships. In
addition, our flexible hybrid work model, which allows the majority of our employees to work remotely on a regular basis, could increase
our operational risk in these areas, including, but not limited to, cybersecurity risks, discussed further below.
Publicly reported cybersecurity vulnerabilities, threats and incidents have increased over recent periods, including a proliferation of
ransomware attacks. Although our computer systems have in the past been, and will likely in the future be, subject to or targets of
unauthorized or fraudulent access, to date, we have not had a material security breach. While we employ a robust and tested information
security program, the preventative actions we take to reduce the incidence and severity of cyber incidents and protect our information
technology may be insufficient to prevent physical and electronic break-ins, cyberattacks, including ransomware and malware attacks,
attacks targeting remote workers, compromised credentials, fraud, other security breaches or other unauthorized access to our computer
systems, and, given the increasing sophistication of cyberattacks, in some cases, such incidents could occur and persist for an extended
period of time without detection. As a result, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not
occur or, if any does occur, that it will be detected in a timely manner or that it can be sufficiently remediated. Such an occurrence may
impede or interrupt our business operations, adversely affect our reputation or lead to increased expense, any of which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event of a disaster such as a natural catastrophe, pandemic, epidemic, industrial accident, blackout, computer virus, terrorist attack,
cyberattack or war, unanticipated problems with our disaster recovery systems could have a material adverse impact on our ability to
conduct business and on our results of operations and financial condition, particularly if those problems affect our computer-based data
processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data. In addition, in the event that a significant number of
our managers were unavailable following a disaster, our ability to effectively conduct business could be severely compromised. These
interruptions also may interfere with our suppliers’ ability to provide goods and services and our employees’ ability to perform their job
responsibilities.
The failure of our computer systems and/or our disaster recovery plans for any reason could cause significant interruptions in our
operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information
relating to our customers. The occurrence of any such failure, interruption or security breach of our systems could damage our
reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and financial
liability. Depending on the nature of the information compromised, in the event of a data breach or other unauthorized access to our
customer data, we may also have obligations to notify affected individuals about the incident, and we may need to provide some form of
remedy, such as a subscription to a credit monitoring service, for the individuals affected by the incident. For more information, see
“Legislative, Regulatory and Tax – State Regulation – Compliance with existing and emerging privacy laws and regulations could result in
increased compliance costs and/or lead to changes in business practices and policies, and any failure to protect the confidentiality of
personal information could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.”
Although we conduct due diligence, negotiate contractual provisions and, in many cases, conduct periodic reviews of our vendors and
other third party suppliers with whom we contract and who we believe may pose a cybersecurity threat to the Company, our customers or
our business partners due to the type of services they provide and/or confidential information they may be handling to confirm
compliance with our information security standards, the failure of such third parties’ computer systems and/or their disaster recovery
plans for any reason might cause significant interruptions in our operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality
or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to our customers. Although such third parties’ computer systems
have in the past been, and will likely in the future be, subject to or targets of unauthorized or fraudulent access, to date, our business,
financial condition and results of operations have not been materially affected by such a cybersecurity incident at a third party. The
occurrence of such a failure, interruption or security breach of the systems of third parties could harm our reputation, subject us to
regulatory sanctions and legal claims, lead to a loss of customers, clients, agents and revenues and otherwise adversely affect our business
and financial results.
Finally, our cyber liability insurance may not be sufficient to protect us against all losses resulting from any cyberattack or other
interruption, breach in security or failure of our disaster recovery systems.
For more information on our cybersecurity risk management and strategy and governance, see “Item 1C. Cybersecurity.” We are also
subject to information security laws and regulations that impose governance and compliance obligations applicable to our business. For
more information, see “Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Privacy and Cybersecurity Regulation.”
Acquisitions and dispositions of businesses may not produce anticipated benefits and could result in operating difficulties, unforeseen liabilities or asset
impairments, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
We may from time to time engage in acquisitions of businesses. Once completed, an acquired business may not perform as projected,
expense and revenue synergies may not materialize as expected and costs associated with the integration may be greater than anticipated.
31
Our financial results could be adversely affected by unanticipated performance issues, unforeseen liabilities, transaction-related charges,
diversion of management time and resources to acquisition integration challenges or growth strategies, loss of key employees or
customers, amortization of expenses related to intangibles, charges for impairment of long-term assets or goodwill and indemnifications.
Factors such as receiving the required governmental or regulatory approvals to merge the acquired entity, delays in implementation or
completion of transition activities or a disruption to our or the acquired entity’s business could impact our results.
We may from time to time dispose of business or blocks of in-force business through outright sales, reinsurance transactions or by
alternate means. For example, on December 14, 2023, we announced that we had entered into an agreement to sell all of the ownership
interests in our subsidiaries comprising our wealth management business. After a disposition, we may remain liable to the acquirer or to
third parties for certain losses or costs arising from the divested business or on other bases. We also may not realize the anticipated profit
on a disposition or incur a loss on the disposition. In anticipation of any disposition, we may need to restructure our operations, which
could disrupt such operations and affect our ability to recruit key personnel needed to operate and grow such business pending the
completion of such transaction. In addition, the actions of key employees of the business to be divested could adversely affect the
success of such disposition as they may be more focused on obtaining employment, or the terms of their employment, than on
maximizing the value of the business to be divested. Furthermore, transition services or tax arrangements related to any such disposition
could further disrupt our operations and may impose restrictions, liabilities, losses or indemnification obligations on us. Depending on its
particulars, a disposition could increase our exposure to certain risks, such as by decreasing the diversification of our sources of revenue.
Moreover, we may be unable to timely dissolve all contractual relationships with the divested business in the course of the proposed
transaction, which may materially adversely affect our ability to realize value from the disposition. Such disposition could also adversely
affect our internal controls and procedures and impair our relationships with key customers, distributors and suppliers. An interruption
or significant change in certain key relationships could materially affect our ability to market our products and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Covenants and Ratings
A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/
or hurt our relationships with creditors.
A downgrade of the financial strength rating of one of our principal insurance subsidiaries could affect our competitive position in the
insurance industry by making it more difficult for us to market our products, as potential customers may select companies with higher
financial strength ratings, and by leading to increased withdrawals by current customers seeking companies with higher financial strength
ratings. This could lead to a decrease in fees as net outflows of assets increase, and therefore, result in lower fee income and lower spread
income. Furthermore, sales of assets to meet customer withdrawal demands could also result in losses, depending on market conditions.
The interest rates we pay on our borrowings are largely dependent on our credit ratings. A downgrade of our debt ratings could affect
our ability to raise additional debt, including bank lines of credit, with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly,
likely increase our cost of capital.
Our ratings and the ratings of our principal insurance subsidiaries are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies,
and therefore, no assurance can be given that our principal insurance subsidiaries or we can maintain our current ratings. See “Item 1.
Business – Financial Strength Ratings” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Ratings” in the MD&A for a description of our ratings.
See also “Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to
our credit and insurer financial strength ratings” above.
Certain blocks of our insurance business purchased from third-party insurers under indemnity reinsurance agreements may require us to place assets in trust, secure
letters of credit or return the business, if the financial strength ratings and/or capital ratios of certain insurance subsidiaries are not maintained at specified levels.
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and LLANY, provide 100% indemnity
reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying
insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer
financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance
agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant
statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Reinsurance” for a discussion of the indemnity reinsurance arrangements and the financial
strength ratings and/or capital ratios that are required to be maintained under such arrangements. As of December 31, 2023, LNL’s and
LLANY’s financial strength ratings and RBC ratios exceeded the ratings and ratios required under each agreement. See “Item 1. Business
– Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings. See “Reinsurance” in the MD&A for additional
information on these indemnity reinsurance agreements.
If the cedent recaptured the business, LNL and LLANY would be required to release reserves and transfer assets to the cedent. Such a
recapture could adversely impact our future profits. Alternatively, if LNL and LLANY established a security trust for the cedent, the
ability to transfer assets out of the trust could be severely restricted, thus negatively impacting our liquidity.
32
Investments
We may have difficulty selling certain holdings in our investment portfolio in a timely manner and realizing full value.
We hold certain investments that may lack liquidity, such as privately placed securities, mortgage loans on real estate, policy loans, limited
partnership interests and other investments. These asset classes represented 38% of the carrying value of our total investments as of
December 31, 2023. If we require significant amounts of cash on short notice in excess of normal cash requirements or are required to
post or return collateral in connection with our investment portfolio, derivatives transactions or securities lending activities, we may have
difficulty selling these investments in a timely manner, be forced to sell them for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize,
or both.
The reported value of our relatively illiquid types of investments, our investments in the asset classes described in the paragraph above
and, at times, our high quality, generally liquid asset classes, do not necessarily reflect the lowest current market price for the asset. If we
were forced to sell certain of our assets in the current market, there can be no assurance that we would be able to sell them for the prices
at which we have recorded them, and we might be forced to sell them at significantly lower prices.
The amount and timing of income from certain investments can be uneven, and their valuations infrequent or volatile, which can impact the amount of income we
record or lead to lower than expected returns, and thereby adversely impact our earnings.
We invest a portion of our investments in investment funds, many of which make private equity investments. The amount and timing of
income from such investment funds tends to be uneven as a result of the performance of the underlying investments, including private
equity investments. The timing of distributions from the funds, which depends on particular events relating to the underlying
investments, as well as the funds’ schedules for making distributions and their needs for cash, can be difficult to predict. In addition,
because these funds, and private equity investments, do not trade on public markets and indications of realizable market value may not be
readily available, valuations can be infrequent and/or more volatile. As a result, the amount of income that we record from these
investments can vary substantially from quarter to quarter, and a sudden or sustained decline in the markets or valuation of one or more
substantial investments could result in lower than expected returns earned by our investment portfolio and thereby adversely impact our
earnings.
Defaults and write-downs on our mortgage loans may adversely affect our profitability.
Our mortgage loans face default risk and are principally collateralized by commercial properties. The performance of our mortgage loan
investments may fluctuate in the future. In addition, some of our mortgage loan investments have balloon payment maturities. An
increase in the default rate of our mortgage loan investments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. Further, any geographic or sector exposure in our mortgage loans may have adverse effects on our investment
portfolios and consequently on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition. While we seek to mitigate this risk by having
a broadly diversified portfolio, events or developments that have a negative effect on any particular geographic region or sector may have
a greater adverse effect on the investment portfolios to the extent that the portfolios are exposed.
The difficulties faced by other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial
services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks and other institutions. Many of these transactions
expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty. In addition, with respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may
be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the
related loan or derivative exposure. We also may have exposure to these financial institutions in the form of unsecured debt instruments,
derivative transactions and/or equity investments. These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of
liquidity, downturns in the economy or real estate values, operational failure, corporate governance issues or other reasons. A downturn
in the U.S. or other economies could result in increased impairments. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to
the carrying value of these assets would not materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our requirements to post collateral or make payments related to declines in market value of specified assets may adversely affect our liquidity and expose us to
counterparty credit risk.
Many of our transactions with financial and other institutions, including settling futures positions, specify the circumstances under which
the parties are required to post collateral. The amount of collateral we may be required to post under these agreements may increase
under certain circumstances, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, under the terms of some of our transactions, we may
be required to make payments to our counterparties related to any decline in the market value of the specified assets.
33
Competition
Intense competition could negatively affect our ability to maintain or increase our profitability.
Our businesses are intensely competitive. We compete based on a number of factors, including name recognition, service, the quality of
investment advice, investment performance, product features, price, perceived financial strength and claims-paying and credit ratings.
Our competitors include insurers, broker-dealers, investment advisers, asset managers, hedge funds and other financial institutions. A
number of our business units face competitors that have greater market share, offer a broader range of products or have higher financial
strength or credit ratings than we do. In recent years, there has been consolidation and convergence among companies in the financial
services industry resulting in increased competition from large, well-capitalized financial services firms. Many of these firms also have
been able to increase their distribution systems through mergers or contractual arrangements. Furthermore, larger competitors may have
lower operating costs and an ability to absorb greater risk while maintaining their financial strength ratings, thereby allowing them to price
their products more competitively. Our customers and clients may engage other financial service providers, and the resulting loss of
business may harm our results of operations or financial condition.
Our sales representatives are not captive and may sell products of our competitors.
We sell our annuity and life insurance products through independent sales representatives. These representatives are not captive, which
means they may also sell our competitors’ products. If our competitors offer products that are more attractive than ours or pay higher
commission rates to the sales representatives than we do, these representatives may concentrate their efforts in selling our competitors’
products instead of ours.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Risk Management and Strategy
Operational Risk Management and Strategy
Identifying, assessing and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats is a core component of our overall operational risk
management. The Company’s Information Security team is the primary group responsible for cybersecurity and consists of four divisions
with specific mandates:
•
•
•
•
The security engineering division, which leads our “security by design” efforts to help ensure cybersecurity considerations are taken
into account in our applications, cloud architecture and infrastructure;
The governance, risk and compliance division, which includes responsibility for developing cybersecurity-related policies and
procedures, training and supplier security review;
The cybersecurity response and investigations (“CSRI”) division; and
The identity access management division, which is responsible for managing access to our data and technology infrastructure.
The work done by each of these divisions is applied both tactically and strategically to operations, as well as to broader risk management
activities.
The governance, risk and compliance division of our Information Security team includes a dedicated information technology (“IT”) and
Cyber operation risk assessment team. This team conducts assessments that are focused on the Company’s most significant IT and cyber
risks, the results of which are leveraged by the Company’s IT leadership, among other inputs, to mitigate, reduce and/or manage against
such risks. While it is not possible to be certain that all risks, threats and vulnerabilities to our information and systems have been
identified, our cybersecurity risk management processes are designed to, using a risk-based approach, identify reasonably known risks
from cybersecurity threats and ensure material risks are managed appropriately.
The work done by the Information Security team integrates into the Company’s overall Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program.
Data is contributed to the ERM team in support of our broader operational risk framework and processes through completion of the
Risk and Control Self-Assessment for IT and cyber, which is aggregated into the larger operational risk program. Members of IT and
Information Security senior leadership participate on the Company’s Operational Risk Committee (“ORC”), which is a standing
committee whose purpose is to review and monitor threats to our business operations and strategy that manifest from inadequate or
failed internal processes, controls, people or systems or from external events. In addition, the Company’s Internal Audit team performs
an annual security audit that focuses on cybersecurity risks, the results of which are reported to the Company’s IT leadership team and the
34
Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. This audit process provides an additional layer of support to help ensure that
cybersecurity risks are managed and responded to appropriately.
While our Information Security team uses some third-party resources as part of its efforts to assess, identify and manage material risks
from cybersecurity threats (e.g., certain third-party software tools, threat intelligence and periodic penetration testing), our cybersecurity
efforts are predominantly conducted through our internal resources.
Monitoring and Incident Response
The CSRI division of our Information Security team is responsible for the operation of our internal Security Operations Center (“SOC”),
which performs monitoring and alerting for security events 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. The CSRI division also
actively seeks out cybersecurity threats that might affect the organization and/or our customers. The CSRI team is a component of
Lincoln’s formal security incident response team (“SIRT”) and process. In addition to the Information Security team, the SIRT also
includes representatives from the Company’s legal and compliance teams (including Privacy), office of business resiliency, chief risk
office, corporate communications, as well as the information technology team. While the CSRI division is responsible for cybersecurity
responses generally, should a critical event arise, such an event would be raised to and addressed by the SIRT.
Our Privacy team, which is part of the Company’s compliance function, has a dedicated incident response team responsible for assessing,
identifying and managing risks from cybersecurity threats involving personal information. The team follows documented processes for
investigation, research, assessment, notification, regulatory reporting and, if necessary, escalation to management, and such processes have
been integrated into our Information Security incident response program. The Information Security team works closely with our Privacy
team to respond to any cybersecurity incidents involving personal information. The Privacy team engages third parties to assist with
incident assessment and notification.
Supplier Risk Management and Strategy
Within the governance, risk and compliance division of our Information Security team, we operate a formal supplier security assessment
program, with a team dedicated to evaluating the cybersecurity risk associated with third party suppliers with whom we have contracted
and who we believe may pose a cybersecurity threat to the Company, our customers or our business partners due to the type of services
they provide and/or confidential information they may be handling. This team assesses the security posture of the supplier, as well as the
security of the systems and services provided. In addition, the team works closely with our procurement and legal teams to help ensure
that appropriate security requirements are included in our contractual arrangements with the suppliers. The team conducts an assessment
both at the outset of the engagement of a new supplier, and then periodically thereafter, based on assigned risk levels, as well as in the
event of any new services or changes to the engagement. The Information Security team’s process for conducting periodic security
reviews of third parties is a component of our operational risk management team’s broader periodic review of third parties.
Risks from Cybersecurity Threats
Although our computer systems and the computer systems of third parties on which we rely have in the past been, and will likely in the
future be, subject to or targets of unauthorized or fraudulent access, to date the Company, including our business strategy, results of
operations or financial condition, has not been materially affected by a cybersecurity breach. There are risks from cybersecurity threats
that if they were to occur could materially affect the Company, including its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition,
as discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – Our information systems or the information systems of third parties on
which we rely may experience interruptions, breaches in security and/or a failure of disaster recovery systems that could result in a loss or
disclosure of confidential information, damage to our reputation, impairment of our ability to conduct business effectively and increased
expenses” and ‘Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax – Compliance with existing and emerging privacy laws and
regulations could result in increased compliance costs and/or lead to changes in business practices and policies, and any failure to protect
the confidentiality of personal information could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.”
Governance
The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for regular oversight of the Company’s overall risk management process. The Board
reviews the most significant risks the Company faces and the manner in which our executives manage these risks. The Board has also
delegated certain of its risk oversight efforts to its committees. Oversight of cybersecurity risk has been delegated to the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Company’s senior management is primarily responsible for establishing policies and procedures designed to identify, assess and
manage the Company’s significant risks, with our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) having primary responsibility with respect
to material risks from cybersecurity threats. We also have a Corporate Enterprise Risk and Capital Committee, made up of members of
35
senior management and the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, which provides oversight of our enterprise-wide risk structure and of our
processes to identify, measure, monitor and manage significant risks, including, but not limited to, cybersecurity risk.
The Information Security organization is led by our CISO. The head of each of the four divisions of our Information Security team
reports directly to the CISO. The CISO reports directly to the Company’s Chief Information Officer and Head of IT (“CIO”), who is a
member of the Company’s Senior Management Committee. As a result, all information security personnel report into the CISO, and
ultimately the CIO. The CISO also reports indirectly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Biannually, the CISO reports to
the Audit Committee on the cybersecurity risks facing the Company and cybersecurity developments generally. In addition, as discussed
above, the Company’s Internal Audit team reports to the Audit Committee the results of its annual security audit focused on cybersecurity
risks. The Company’s Chief Compliance Officer reports key Privacy risk indicators and statistics (including those related to cybersecurity
risks) to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.
Our current CISO has over 20 years of experience in the field of cybersecurity and holds a Certified Information Security Systems
Professional designation. The CISO has a staff of more than 100 employees dedicated to protecting the data and systems belonging to
the Company, our customers, business partners and consumers.
Item 2. Properties
As of December 31, 2023, LNC and our subsidiaries owned or leased 2.5 million square feet of office and other space. We leased less
than 0.1 million square feet of office space in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which includes space for LFN. We leased 0.2 million square
feet of office space in Radnor, Pennsylvania, for our corporate center and for LFD. We leased 0.6 million square feet of office space in
Fort Wayne, Indiana, primarily for our Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments. We owned 0.8 million square feet of office
space in Greensboro, North Carolina, primarily for our Life Insurance segment. We owned or leased 0.3 million square feet of office
space in Omaha, Nebraska, 0.2 million square feet of office space in Atlanta, Georgia, and 0.1 million square feet in Dover, New
Hampshire, primarily for our Group Protection segment. An additional 0.3 million square feet of office space is leased in other U.S. cities
for branch offices. This discussion regarding properties does not include information on field offices and investment properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings, see “Regulatory and Litigation Matters” in Note 13, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
36
Information About our Executive Officers
Our Executive Officers as of February 16, 2024, were as follows:
Name
Age (1)
Position with LNC and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Ellen G. Cooper
59
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (since May 2022). Until May 2022, Executive
Vice President (since August 2012), Head of Enterprise Risk (since 2019) and Head of Annuity
Solutions Group (since March 2021). Chief Investment Officer (August 2012 - November 2021).
Craig T. Beazer
56
Jayson R. Bronchetti
44
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (since December 2020). Executive Vice President,
General Counsel (January 2020 - December 2020) and Secretary (July 2019 - December 2020),
KeyCorp, a bank-based financial services company. Deputy General Counsel, KeyCorp (July 2018
- January 2020). Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation, a global investments company (July 2015 - July 2018).
Executive Vice President (since May 2022), Chief Investment Officer (since November 2021) and
Head of Hedging (since May 2023) and Sustainability (since May 2022), and President, Lincoln
Investment Advisors Corporation(2) (since March 2016). Head of Risk (May 2022 - May 2023).
Head of Corporate Fixed Income (February 2020 - November 2021). Managing Director, Head of
Manager Selection & Research (July 2015 - March 2016).
Matthew Grove
48
Executive Vice President and President of Retail Solutions (since July 2022). Chief Executive
Officer and President (January 2021 - July 2022), Resolution Life USA, a global life insurance
company. Co-Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President (2017 - 2020), New York
Life Insurance Company.
John C. Kennedy
57
Executive Vice President (since March 2021) and Chief Distribution and Brand Officer (assuming
the role of head of distribution in March 2021 and the role of head of brand in March 2022), and
President, LFD(2) (since March 2021). Senior Vice President and Head of Retirement Solutions
Distribution for LFD (September 2009 - March 2021).
Christopher Neczypor
43
Andrew D. Rallis
James Reid
61
57
Kenneth S. Solon
63
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since February 2023). Until February 2023,
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer (since November 2021). Senior Vice
President and Head of Alternatives, Structured Credit and Investment Strategy (2020 - November
2021). Senior Vice President and Head of Investment Risk and Strategy (April 2018 - 2020).
Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (since May 2023). Executive Vice President and
Global Chief Actuary (July 2012 - May 2023), MetLife, Inc.
Executive Vice President and President, Workplace Solutions (since August 2022). President and
Chief Executive Officer (April 2021 - August 2022), Versant Health, a managed vision care
company. Executive Vice President and Head of Global Employee Benefits (January 2016 - March
2021), MetLife, Inc.
Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer, Head of IT and Digital (since July 2018) and
Head of Enterprise Services (since March 2021). Executive Vice President, Chief Information
Officer and Head of Administrative Services (January 2016 - July 2018). Senior Vice President,
Head of Technology (March 2015 - December 2015). Senior Vice President, Head of Shared
Services and Technology (January 2010 - March 2015).
Sean N. Woodroffe
60
Executive Vice President and Chief People, Culture and Communications Officer (since May
2023). Senior Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer (March 2018 - April 2023),
TIAA, a financial service provider. Senior Vice President and Head of HR, Client Services &
Technology (July 2017 - February 2018), TIAA.
(1) Age shown is based on the officer’s age as of February 16, 2024.
(2) Denotes an affiliate of LNC.
37
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Stock Market and Dividend Information
Our common stock is traded on the New York stock exchange under the symbol LNC. As of February 16, 2024, the number of
shareholders of record of our common stock was 5,260. The dividend on our common stock is declared each quarter by our Board of
Directors if we are eligible to pay dividends and the Board determines that we will pay dividends. In determining dividends, the Board
takes into consideration items such as our financial condition, including current and expected earnings, projected cash flows and
anticipated financing needs. For potential restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends” and Note
19 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
For information on securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see “Part III – Item 12. Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters – Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Not Applicable
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following summarizes purchases of equity securities by the issuer during the quarter ended December 31, 2023 (dollars in millions,
except per share data):
(a) Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share
(c) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (2)
(d) Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs (2)
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
–
–
714
714
714
Period
10/1/23 – 10/31/23
11/1/23 – 11/30/23
12/1/23 – 12/31/23
(1) Of the total number of shares purchased, no shares were received in connection with the exercise of stock options and related taxes.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2023, there were no shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs.
(2) On November 10, 2021, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in our securities repurchase authorization, bringing the total
aggregate repurchase authorization to $1.5 billion. As of December 31, 2023, our remaining security repurchase authorization was
$714 million. The security repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date. The amount and timing of share repurchases
depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of free cash flow and an evaluation of the costs and benefits
associated with alternative uses of capital. Our stock repurchases may be effected from time to time through open market purchases
or in privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to an accelerated share repurchase agreement or Rule 10b5-1 plan.
Item 6. [Reserved]
38
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language
Introduction
Executive Summary
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
Results of Consolidated Operations
Results of Annuities
Results of Life Insurance
Results of Group Protection
Results of Retirement Plan Services
Results of Other Operations
Consolidated Investments
Reinsurance
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Page
40
41
41
43
53
55
60
66
69
73
75
87
88
39
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of
December 31, 2023, compared with December 31, 2022, and the results of operations in 2023 compared to 2022 of Lincoln National
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions of 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 that are
not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2022, as updated by our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 22, 2023. Unless otherwise stated or the context
otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
On January 1, 2023, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-12,
Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts and related amendments (“ASU 2018-12”) with a transition date
of January 1, 2021. ASU 2018-12 updated accounting and reporting requirements for long-duration contracts and certain investment
contracts issued by insurance entities. We adopted ASU 2018-12 under the modified retrospective approach, except for market risk
benefits (“MRBs”) for which we applied the full retrospective approach. Our consolidated financial statements are presented under the
new guidance for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2021. For more information, see Note 3.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a
statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future
results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,”
“project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial
performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products,
future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by
the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or
implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
• Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account balances, investment results,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to
realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax
assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance
existing debt as it matures;
The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding
company’s ability to meet its obligations;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products;
the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business and our captive reinsurance arrangements as well as
restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and 12b-1 distribution fees;
The impact of U.S. federal tax reform legislation on our business, earnings and capital;
The impact of regulations adopted by the SEC, the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory
organizations that could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and result in additional disclosure and
other requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products;
The impact of new and emerging rules, laws and regulations relating to privacy, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence that may lead
to increased compliance costs, reputation risk and/or changes in business practices;
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters that
may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
•
• Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and
•
•
demand for our products;
Rapidly increasing or sustained high interest rates that may negatively affect our profitability, value of our investment portfolio and
capital position and may cause policyholders to surrender annuity and life insurance policies, thereby causing realized investment
losses;
The impact of the implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of
derivatives transactions;
40
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse
actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant
actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result
in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of
asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to
guaranteed benefit riders, which are accounted for as MRBs, of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;
Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
A deviation in actual experience regarding future policyholder behavior, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns
from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce
future earnings;
Changes in accounting principles that may affect our consolidated financial statements;
Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect
such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may
have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial
assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or
privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches of our data security systems;
The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, including the inability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions of
businesses and potential operating difficulties and unforeseen liabilities relating thereto, as well as the effect of restructurings, product
withdrawals and other unusual items;
The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of
efforts related to, our strategic initiatives, including the Spark Initiative;
The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder
claims, affect our businesses and increase the cost and availability of reinsurance;
Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect
the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of
our client base; and
The unanticipated loss of key management, financial planners or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC
include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and
“Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we
operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for
management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of
factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and
uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we
disclaim any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of
this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide
range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement income products and solutions through our four
business segments:
Annuities;
Life Insurance;
•
•
• Group Protection; and
•
Retirement Plan Services
41
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments.
See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated revenues and net income (loss), we also provide segment operating revenues and
income (loss) from operations because we believe they are meaningful measures of revenues and the profitability of our operating
segments. Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are the financial performance measures we use to evaluate and assess
the results of our segments. Accordingly, we define and report operating revenues and income (loss) from operations by segment in Note
20. Our management believes that operating revenues and income (loss) from operations explain the results of our ongoing businesses in
a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from
operating revenue and income (loss) from operations because they are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating
fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily
relate to the operations of the individual segments. In addition, we believe that our definitions of operating revenues and income (loss)
from operations will provide investors with a more valuable measure of our performance because it better reveals trends in our
businesses.
We provide information about our segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items, key drivers of changes
and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth,
see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
We continue to be influenced by a variety of trends that affect the industry.
Interest Rate Environment
Throughout 2023, the Federal Reserve continued to reiterate its commitment to implement and maintain policy as needed to achieve a
return to its target level inflation over the longer run. To support this goal, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate target
range by 100 basis points during 2023. In January 2024, the Federal Reserve announced it would maintain the current federal funds target
range of 5.25% to 5.50% for the time-being and stated that while the policy rate is likely at its peak for this tightening cycle, it does not
expect it will be appropriate to reduce the federal funds target range until it has greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably
toward 2.0%. As interest rates were rising, which improves the yield on our new money and floating rate investments, we continued to be
proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability
practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this interest rate environment. As a result of the higher interest rate
environment, sales of fixed annuities, fixed-indexed annuities and registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”) products increased across
the industry. Due to inflationary concerns and the higher interest rate environment, life insurance industry sales slowed in 2023. If the
higher interest rate environment persists into 2024, these industry sales trends may continue in 2024.
We have provided disclosures around risks related to changes in interest rates in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions –
Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make
it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest
rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased
contract withdrawals,” “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review – Long-Term New Money Investment
Yield Sensitivity” below and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation.
Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the life insurance industry. Regulations recently
adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased
regulation and oversight for the industry. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative,
Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
42
Significant Operational Matters
Throughout 2023, we executed against our strategic priorities of strengthening our balance sheet, improving free cash flow and focusing
on profitable growth. Notable actions in 2023 include the following:
• In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude Re”), with an
effective date of October 1, 2023;
• In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through Lincoln
Financial Network (“LFN”), which is expected to close in the first half of 2024. We anticipate that the capital benefit from this
transaction will be used to improve our statutory capital position and reduce our leverage ratio; and
• We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our buyback program during 2023.
For additional information on the Fortitude Re reinsurance agreements, see Notes 4 and 8. For additional information on the planned
sale of our wealth management business, see “Results of Annuities” below and Note 1. For information on risks related to capital, see
“Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position.” For information on the risks related to acquisitions and dispositions,
see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – Acquisitions and dispositions of businesses may not produce anticipated
benefits and could result in operating difficulties, unforeseen liabilities or asset impairments, which may adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition.”
We continue to focus on the following actions in 2024:
• Growing our industry-leading wholesale distribution through Lincoln Financial Distributors, which distributes our annuities and life
insurance products as well as our retirement plan products and services through financial professionals, broker-dealers and other
financial services intermediaries;
Shifting our new business to a more capital-efficient mix with higher risk-adjusted returns;
• Making investments in our businesses and product enhancements to grow revenues, drive margin and reduce costs;
•
• Exploring reinsurance and other strategies to maximize the value of our businesses;
•
Improving the profitability of our Group Protection business through strategic pricing actions and repositioning our business through
new market segment strategies as part of our longer-term margin expansion initiatives; and
• Focusing on expense discipline and managing our expenses aggressively. In February 2024, we reduced our workforce by
approximately 5% to streamline our organizational structure, improve operational efficiency and reduce expenses. While we expect
that this action will ultimately create expense efficiencies, we will incur workforce reduction expenses during the first half of 2024 that
will be reported within Other Operations.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
We have identified the accounting estimates below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition.
In applying these critical accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates
and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our
assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
Investments
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include
inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or non-performance risk, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate
of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit
price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as
opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments
carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-
level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
43
The following summarizes investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy
level (in millions) as of December 31, 2023:
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair Value
Priced by third-party pricing services
Priced by independent broker quotations
Priced by matrices
Priced by other methods (1)
Total
$
$
421 $
– –
– –
– –
421 $
75,660 $
–
17,256
–
92,916 $
147 $
4,335 –
–
223 –
4,705 $
76,228
4,335
17,256
223
98,042
Percent of total
0%
95%
5%
100%
(1) Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity AFS securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of
December 31, 2023 and 2022, see Notes 1 and 15.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported
trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market
indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We
incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We
use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or
obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than
broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the
limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize
observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that
different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset
or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in
the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public
information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2023, we
evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion,
as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing
information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized
debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-
quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market
participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer
recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of
December 31, 2023, we used broker quotes for 14 securities as our final price source, representing less than 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with
similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes.
Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data.
The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit
information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s
valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs
used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by
the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a
sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing
44
service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they
are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of
change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing
source.
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which
are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally
reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual
audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or
second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may
not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded
audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains
and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of
evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to
sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk
monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers
may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors
other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to
sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to
manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our
assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a
particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other
risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and
manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific
financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our
external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit
loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue
to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include
subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers,
future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions
and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are
often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation”
above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our
best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other
indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the
carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of
the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to
determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans.
Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for
monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire
commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts.
Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value
reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss
allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk
45
characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar
loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data
utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Our additional liabilities for other insurance benefits reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses.
When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our additional liabilities reserve. These actual to
expected adjustments would be reported in benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency
exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity risk and credit risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and
issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Policyholder Account Balances” below for information
on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of hedging and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often
involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs
or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including
but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit
spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized
gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our
segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 6. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives,
including sensitivities, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Future contract benefits represent liability reserves that we have established and carry based on estimates of how much we will need to
pay for future benefits and claims.
Liability for Future Policy Benefits
Liability for future policy benefits (“LFPB”) represents the reserve amounts associated with non-participating traditional life insurance
contracts and limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts that are calculated to meet the various policy and contract obligations as
they mature. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to policyholders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to
represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the
assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions,
additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity and policyholder behavior (e.g.,
persistency) and withdrawals. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the actuarial assumptions
to best estimate future premium and benefit cash flows (“cash flow assumptions”) and projection models used in estimating these
liabilities and update these assumptions as needed (excluding the claims settlement expense assumption that is locked-in at inception) in
the calculation of the net premium ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information
that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In measuring our
LFPB, we establish cohorts, which are groupings of long-duration contracts. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the net
premium ratio at the cohort level for actual experience. For all contract cohorts issued after January 1, 2021, interest is accrued on LFPB
at the single-A interest rate on the contract cohort inception date. For contract cohorts issued prior to January 1, 2021, interest remains
accruing at the original discount rate in effect on the contract cohort inception date due to the modified retrospective transition method.
We also remeasure the LFPB using the single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period.
Liability for Future Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term life and disability claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These
reserves use actuarial assumptions primarily based on claim termination rates, offsets for other insurance including social security and
long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions. Such cash flow assumptions are subject to the comprehensive review process
discussed above. We remeasure the liability for future claims using a single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period. See
“Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
46
Universal Life Insurance Products with Secondary Guarantees
We issue UL-type contracts where we provide a secondary guarantee to the policyholder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base
policy account balance is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. These guaranteed benefits require
an additional liability that is calculated based on the application of a benefit ratio (calculated as the present value of total expected benefit
payments over the life of the contract from inception divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the
contract). These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and
direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated
with the contracts. Cash flow assumptions incorporated in a benefit ratio in measuring these additional liabilities for other insurance
benefits include mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals based principally on generally
accepted actuarial methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the cash
flow assumptions and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions in the calculation of the benefit
ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such
an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For additional information on future contract benefits, see Note 13.
Market Risk Benefits
MRBs are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and
expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or circumstance, such as death, annuitization
or periodic withdrawal. An MRB can be in either an asset or a liability position. Our MRB assets and MRB liabilities are reported at fair
value separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We issue variable and fixed annuity contracts that may include various types of guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) and guaranteed death
benefit (“GDB”) riders that we have accounted for as MRBs. For contracts that contain multiple riders that qualify as MRBs, the MRBs
are valued on a combined basis using an integrated model. We have entered into reinsurance agreements to cede certain GLB and GDB
riders where the reinsurance agreements themselves are accounted for as MRBs or contain MRBs. We therefore record ceded MRB
assets and ceded MRB liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. We report ceded MRBs associated with these reinsurance
agreements in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net amount at risk (“NAR”) represents the amount of GLB or GDB in excess of a policyholder’s account balance at the balance sheet
date. Underperforming markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB and GDB riders. A contract with a GDB rider
is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the GDB. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 15% and 26%,
respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GDB rider were “in the money.” A contract with a GLB rider is “in the money” if the
policyholder’s account balance falls below the present value of GLB payments, assuming no full surrenders. As of December 31, 2023
and 2022, 21% and 37%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB rider were “in the money.” However, the only way the
policyholder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account balance of the contract is through a series of
withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the
account balance is exhausted, the policyholder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account balance can also
fluctuate with market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account
balance.
Many policyholders have both a GLB and GDB present on the same policy. The total NAR represents the greater of GLB NAR and
GDB NAR for each policy as only one benefit can be exercised in practice. Details underlying the NAR, net of reinsurance, (in millions)
were as follows:
GLB NAR
GDB NAR
Total NAR
Annuities
As of December 31,
Retirement Plan Services
As of December 31,
2023
2022
2023
2022
$
1,805 $
1,491
3,143
3,261 $
5,077
7,975
1 $
3
4
3
13
15
Change in the fair value of MRB assets and liabilities is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss), except for the portion attributable to the change in non-performance risk, which is recognized in other
comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). Change in the fair value of ceded MRB assets and liabilities, including the changes in our
counterparties’ non-performance risks, is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
47
MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our non-performance risk.
Ceded MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our counterparties’
non-performance risk. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market
participant and include assumptions for capital markets, lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin and administrative expenses.
These assumptions are based on a combination of historical data and actuarial judgments. The assumption for our own non-performance
risk and our counterparties’ non-performance risk for MRBs and ceded MRBs, respectively, are determined at each valuation date and
reflect our risk and our counterparties’ risks of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the non-
performance risk is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions
are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess
our assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions used in calculating the
fair value of these MRBs and update these assumptions on a prospective basis as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other
quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. For information on fair value inputs, see
Note 15. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For illustrative purposes, the following presents hypothetical effects to MRBs attributable to changes to key assumptions / inputs,
assuming all other factors remain constant:
Assumption / Input
Actual
Experience
Hypothetical Hypothetical
Effect
to MRB
Liability
Effect
to Net
Income
Description of Assumption / Input
Equity market return
Increase /
(Decrease)
(Decrease) /
Increase
Increase /
(Decrease)
Equity market return input represents impact based on
movements in equity markets.
Interest rate
Volatility
Higher /
Lower
(Decrease) /
Increase
Increase /
(Decrease)
Interest rate input represents impact based on movements in
interest rates and impact to fixed-income assets.
Increase /
(Decrease)
Increase /
(Decrease)
(Decrease) /
Increase
Volatility assumption represents overall volatilities assumed
for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a
mixture of equity and fixed-income assets. Volatility
assumptions vary by fund due to the benchmarking of
difference indices.
Mortality
Increase /
(Decrease)
(Decrease) /
Increase
Increase /
(Decrease)
Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an
individual belonging to a particular group, categorized
according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die.
Mortality contracts
with only GDB rider
Increase /
(Decrease)
Increase /
(Decrease)
(Decrease) /
Increase
Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an
individual belonging to a particular group, categorized
according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die.
Lapse
Higher /
Lower
(Decrease) /
Increase
Increase /
(Decrease)
Lapse assumption represents the estimated probability of a
contract surrendering during a year, thereby forgoing any
future benefits.
Benefit utilization
Higher /
Lower
Increase /
(Decrease)
(Decrease) /
Increase
Benefit utilization assumption of guaranteed withdrawals
represents the estimated percentage of policyholders that
utilize the guaranteed withdrawal feature.
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to selected risk caused by changes in equity markets and interest rates associated
with GLB and GDB riders that are available in our variable annuity products and accounted for as MRBs. Effective January 1, 2023, we
revised our hedge program, which continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing
distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. We utilize options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures
on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. For additional
information on our derivatives, see Note 6.
48
As part of our hedge program, equity market and interest rate conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge
positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not
completely offset changes in the fair value of our GLB and GDB riders caused by movements in these factors due to, among other
things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings
in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, policyholder behavior, divergence between
the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge
instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
The following table presents our after-tax estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from
sudden changes that may occur in equity markets and interest rates (in millions) and excludes the net cost of operating the hedge program.
The amounts represent the difference between the change in GLB and GDB riders and the change in the fair value of the underlying
hedge instruments. These estimates are based upon the balance as of December 31, 2023, net of reinsurance, and the related hedge
instruments in place as of that date.
The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes
to equity market returns and interest rates occurred.
Equity Market Return
Hypothetical effect to net income
Interest Rates
Hypothetical effect to net income
In-Force Sensitivities
-10%
+10%
$
(775) $
-25 bps
+25 bps
(500)
600
450
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the table above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are
out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
• The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2023, due to changing market conditions, policyholder activity, hedge positions and
other factors;
• The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market
changes;
• The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
• Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, may be overly simplistic and not
•
indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without
affecting other capital market sectors; and
• The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB and GDB riders and
the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
For additional information on MRBs, see Note 10.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date.
This liability includes UL and VUL and investment-type annuity products where account balances are equal to deposits plus interest
credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and policyholder administration charges (collectively known as “policyholder
assessments”), as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our IUL and indexed
annuity products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models
underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives and update assumptions as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other
quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below
for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the
contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the policyholder’s
account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the policyholder. Policyholders may elect to
rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years,
we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates,
subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of
our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market
of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a
component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and
49
the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may
purchase or sell in the future to hedge policyholder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the
cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators
of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For more information on indexed product net derivative results, see Note
21.
For additional information on the liability for policyholder account balances, see Note 12.
Reinsurance Recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables are generally measured and recognized consistent with the assumptions and methodologies used to project the
future performance of the underlying direct business as discussed in the “Future Contract Benefits” and “Policyholder Account Balances”
sections above. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models
and update assumptions as needed. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In addition, we consider the
potential impact of counterparty credit risks related to the reinsurance recoverable by estimating an allowance for credit losses using a
probability of loss model approach to estimate expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables. For additional information on our
allowance for credit losses on reinsurance-related assets, see Note 8.
Annual Assumption Review
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating
MRBs, our reserves and embedded derivatives. For more information on our comprehensive review, see Note 1. Details underlying the
effect to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Income (loss) from operations:
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Excluded from income (loss) from operations
Net income (loss)
$
$
1 $
(156)
24
–
(36)
(167) $
1 $
(2,107)
(12)
–
74
(2,044) $
(1)
127
24
–
(241)
(91)
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2023
• For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior and mortality assumptions, partially
offset by the favorable impact of a 50-basis-point increase in our long-term new money investment yield assumption.
• For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability and life waiver claim termination rate
assumptions, partially offset by the unfavorable impact due to updates to long-term disability social security offset assumptions.
• For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the unfavorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by
updates to mortality and policyholder lapse behavior assumptions and other items, partially offset by a favorable impact from updates
to volatility and policyholder GLB utilization behavior assumptions.
2022
• For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products
with secondary guarantees in the amount of $1.9 billion, after-tax, as well as updates to mortality and morbidity assumptions and other
items.
• For Group Protection, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions,
partially offset by the favorable impact of updates to life waiver termination assumptions.
• For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the favorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates
to policyholder benefit utilization behavior and fund mapping and volatility assumptions, partially offset by an unfavorable impact
from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees that impacted ceded
reserves.
50
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more
frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its
carrying value. Intangibles that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We perform a quantitative
goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit.
If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired and written down to the reporting
unit’s fair value. The results of one test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of another reporting unit.
For the purposes of the evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, our reporting units correspond with our reporting segments.
The fair values of our reporting units are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the value of new business.
Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we expect to issue in the
future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the values of in-force and
new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected, weighted-average rate
of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each reporting unit.
We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Factors that can influence the value of
goodwill include the capital markets, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, consumer confidence and any items that can directly
or indirectly affect new business future cash flows. Factors that could affect production levels and profitability of new business include
mix of new business, pricing changes, customer acceptance of our products and distribution strength. Spread compression and related
effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new
business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value
are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments.
Examples of unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Lower expectations for future sales levels or future sales profitability;
•
• Higher discount rates on new business assumptions;
• Weakened expectations for the ability to execute future reserve financing transactions for life insurance business over the long-term
•
•
or expectations for significant increases in the associated costs;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products, the required amount of
reserves and/or surplus, or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including changes to statutory reserve requirements or
changes to RBC requirements; and
Valuations of significant mergers or acquisitions of companies or blocks of business that would provide relevant market-based inputs
for our impairment assessment that could support less favorable conclusions regarding the estimated fair value of our reporting units.
As of October 1, 2023, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our reporting units (Annuities, Group
Protection and Retirement Plan Services), and, as of such date, the fair value was in excess of the carrying value for each such reporting
unit.
In the third quarter of 2022, as a result of the capital market environment, including (i) declining equity markets and (ii) the impact of
rising interest rates on our discount rate assumption, we accelerated our quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Life Insurance
reporting unit as we concluded that there were indicators of impairment. Based on this quantitative test, which included updating our
best estimate assumptions therein, we incurred an impairment during the third quarter of 2022 of the Life Insurance reporting unit
goodwill of $634 million, which represented the write-off of the entire balance of goodwill for the reporting unit.
As of October 1, 2022, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for the remaining reporting units, and, as of
October 1, 2022, the fair value was in excess of each such other reporting unit’s carrying value.
For more information on goodwill and specifically identifiable intangible assets by segment, see Notes 1 and 9.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the
deferred income tax assets and liabilities for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax
returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and
regulations. Management exercises judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax assets and
liabilities. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative
51
changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions
could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net
income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of
2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. Both provisions became effective for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. We determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative minimum
tax for 2023.
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if
necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Judgment and the use of estimates
are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating
the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities;
taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized;
and any future prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
As of December 31, 2023, we had an approximate $1.4 billion deferred tax asset related to net unrealized losses on fixed maturity
available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management concluded that its
tax planning strategy to hold these securities to recovery was prudent and feasible as these unrealized losses were caused by factors other
than credit loss, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to recovery and collect all of the contractual cash flows. As of
December 31, 2023, we had an approximate $441 million deferred tax asset related to the portfolio of investments sold in the Fortitude
Re reinsurance transaction. See Notes 4 and 8 for additional information. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax
asset, management considered future tax planning strategies, including sales of certain appreciated fixed maturity securities, sales of certain
corporate assets and other investment management strategies. Such tax planning strategies are viewed by management as prudent and
feasible, and one or a combination of these strategies may be implemented if necessary to realize the deferred tax asset.
We may experience an increased likelihood of recording a valuation allowance in the future based on the following factors:
• Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may impact the value of appreciated securities and the sale of certain
corporate assets; and
• Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that may impact the sale of certain corporate assets.
Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, we had a $87 million deferred tax asset related to net operating losses, a $131 million deferred tax
asset related to federal income tax credits and a $93 million deferred tax asset related to capital losses generated from the Fortitude Re
reinsurance transaction. These deferred tax assets can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes
payable in those future periods. The net operating losses do not expire and can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal income tax
credits expire in 10 years. The capital losses can be carried back three years and carried forward five years.
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, will be realized.
For risks related to establishing a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, see “Part I – Item1A. Risk Factors – Assumptions
and Estimates – We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets.”
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 23.
52
Details underlying the consolidated results (in millions) were as follows:
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net Income (Loss)
Income (loss) from operations:
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Net annuity product features, after-tax
Net life insurance product features, after-tax
Credit loss-related adjustments, after-tax
Investment gains (losses), after-tax
Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related
embedded derivatives, trading securities and
certain mortgage loans, after-tax (1)
Impairment of intangibles
Transaction and integration costs related to mergers,
acquisitions and divestitures, after-tax
Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment
of debt, after-tax
Net income (loss)
$
$
1,073 $
(159)
299
171
(411)
52
(310)
(63)
(744)
(633)
–
(27)
–
(752) $
1,161 $
(2,094)
41
211
(486)
3,266
21
(103)
16
(41)
(634)
–
–
1,358 $
1,337
487
(164)
248
(371)
1,600
(1)
87
519
53
–
(11)
(6)
3,778
(1) The coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair
value recorded in OCI. Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivative related to the
coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income
(loss). See Note 8 for more information.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Net income decreased due primarily to the following:
• Lower gain in net annuity product features driven by unfavorable changes in the fair value of GLB and GDB hedge instruments in
2023 compared to favorable changes in 2022 attributable to the impact of capital markets and lower gain in MRB-related impacts due
to the impact of capital markets.
• Higher investment losses driven by losses on fixed maturity AFS securities as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction.
• Higher unfavorable changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans
driven by the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction.
• Loss in net life insurance product features in 2023 compared to gain in 2022 driven by mark-to-market losses on hedges associated
with VUL products.
• Higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
• Transaction costs pertaining to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction and the planned sale of our wealth management business.
The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:
• Less unfavorable impact from our annual assumption review.
• Goodwill impairment in 2022 in our Life Insurance segment.
• Lower total loss ratio in our Group Protection segment.
• Higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
53
Additional Information
In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re, with an effective date of October 1, 2023. For more
information on the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction, see Notes 4 and 8.
In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through LFN.
For additional information, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Protect and Rebuild Statutory
Capital” above, “Results of Annuities” below and Note 1.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual
assumption review.
For a discussion of the 2022 goodwill impairment, see “Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Goodwill” above.
54
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)
Fee income
Net investment income
Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold
$
through reinsurance
Other revenues (2)
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses
Benefits (1)
Interest credited
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Commissions and other expenses
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) from operations before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from operations
$
(1,584) $
2,196
1,734
31
625
3,002
(1,506)
1,252
2
2,041
1,789
1,213
140
1,073 $
165 $
2,347
1,463
25
482
4,482
251
894
2
1,989
3,136
1,346
185
1,161 $
116
2,622
1,400
26
527
4,691
203
809
(3)
2,090
3,099
1,592
255
1,337
(1) Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include primarily
changes in income annuity reserves driven by insurance premiums.
(2) Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility, and the net settlement
related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•
•
Lower fee income driven by lower average daily variable account balances.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, reflecting lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, which more
than offset impacts from higher average fixed account balances and improving portfolio yields from the current interest rate
environment. The lower net investment income, net of interest credited, was experienced in certain reinsured portfolios that have a
corresponding increase in other revenues.
• Higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business
operations.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense due to a more favorable tax return true-
up driven by the separate account dividends-received deduction.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-
force fixed annuities. We expect an ongoing reduction in income (loss) from operations in future quarters of approximately zero to $5
million per quarter as a result of this reinsurance transaction. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the
ceding of in-force life-contingent payout fixed annuities that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 8 for more
information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
On December 14, 2023, we announced that we had entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Osaic, pursuant to which Osaic agreed
to acquire all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that comprise the Company’s wealth management business
55
operated through LFN. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2024, subject to customary closing conditions, including
regulatory approvals.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not
significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations.
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account balances. An important measure of retention is
the reduction in account balances caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of
average gross account balances were 9%, 7% and 8% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our outflow rate increase in 2023 was due
primarily to an increase in full surrenders as a result of the increased interest rate environment.
Our fixed annuities and RILA have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be
subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting
rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio
management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may
cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I –
Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to
decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk
Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our
investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive
Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Fee Income
Mortality, expense and other assessments (1)
Surrender charges
DFEL:
Deferrals
Amortization
Total fee income
(1) Presented net of GLB and GDB hedge allowance.
$
$
2,143 $
45
(19)
27
2,196 $
2,318 $
24
(23)
28
2,347 $
2,609
11
(27)
29
2,622
We charge policyholders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses.
These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily variable account balances. Average daily
variable account balances are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual
rate that is applied either to the account balance or the guaranteed amount. We allocate a portion of these fees to support the cost of
hedging GLB and GDB riders. For more information, see Note 20. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable
annuity policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
56
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real
estate and other, net of investment expenses
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)
Surplus investments (2)
Net investment income pertaining to
broker-dealer services
Total net investment income
Interest Credited
Amount provided to policyholders
DSI deferrals
Interest credited before DSI amortization
DSI amortization
Total interest credited
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
1,600 $
1,305 $
1,155
2
128
4
1,734
1,242
(5)
1,237
15
1,252 $
31
127
–
1,463
880
(2)
878
16
894 $
70
175
–
1,400
794
(3)
791
18
809
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional
information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income
on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting
product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative
investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our deferred fixed annuity products, including the fixed
portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments
supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed
annuity policyholders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan
prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary
significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not
indicative of the underlying trends.
57
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
Variable Annuity Account Balance Information (1)
Variable annuity deposits
Variable annuity net flows
Variable annuity account balances
Average daily variable annuity account balances
Average daily S&P 500® Index (2)
Fixed Annuity Account Balance Information (3)
Fixed annuity deposits
Fixed annuity net flows
Fixed annuity account balances (4)
Average fixed annuity account balances (4)
$
$
As of or For the Years Ended
December 31,
2022
2021
2023
2,981 $
(7,196)
113,355
108,473
4,285
9,839 $
5,169
39,471
39,733
3,370 $
(5,867)
105,573
114,838
4,100
8,462 $
5,530
37,165
34,754
5,220
(6,278)
136,665
133,833
4,269
6,519
3,827
33,833
30,610
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account balances. The account balances of
our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to,
domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Includes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(4) Net of reinsurance.
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
58
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions:
Deferrable
Non-deferrable
General and administrative expenses
Expenses associated with reserve financing
and LOC expenses
Taxes, licenses and fees
Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer
DAC deferrals
Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred,
excluding amortization
DAC and VOBA amortization:
Amortization
Impact from annual assumption review
Broker-dealer expenses incurred
Total commissions and other expenses
$
354 $
617
471
12
41
1,495
(411)
390 $
628
408
4
43
1,473
(449)
1,084
1,024
433
(2)
526
2,041 $
430
(1)
536
1,989 $
450
688
439
2
53
1,632
(515)
1,117
402
1
570
2,090
DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of sales/deposits
3.2 %
3.8 %
4.4 %
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are
deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the
groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of
commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in
these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues.
59
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)
Fee income
Net investment income
Operating realized gain (loss)
Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold
through reinsurance
Other revenues
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses
Benefits
Interest credited
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Commissions and other expenses
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) from operations before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from operations
$
$
1,162 $
3,010
2,712
(6)
5
24
6,907
4,436
1,290
147
1,265
7,138
(231)
(72)
(159) $
1,146 $
2,995
2,587
(7)
18
8
6,747
4,071
1,310
2,854
1,193
9,428
(2,681)
(587)
(2,094) $
1,033
3,121
3,207
(7)
12
21
7,387
4,136
1,457
(17)
1,214
6,790
597
110
487
(1) Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
• Lower policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss and benefits driven by less unfavorable impacts from the annual assumption
review and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, respectively, partially offset by higher benefits due to growth
in reserves.
• Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset
by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
• Higher fee income driven by growth in business in force, partially offset by the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance
transaction.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by the following:
• Higher commissions and other expenses due to higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business
operations.
• Lower amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold through reinsurance driven by the deferred loss recognized as part of the
fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual
assumption review.
For more information on the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, see “Additional Information” below.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-
force UL with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”) and MoneyGuard®. Due to the timing of when the reinsurance agreements were finalized
60
in mid-November, income (loss) from operations for the fourth quarter of 2023 was unfavorably impacted by approximately $15 million.
We expect an ongoing reduction in income (loss) from operations in future quarters of approximately $25 million to $30 million per
quarter as a result of this reinsurance transaction. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital
position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in
interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more
challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates
may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract
withdrawals” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the
current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force.
Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account balances and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Fee Income
Cost of insurance assessments
Expense assessments
Surrender charges
DFEL:
Deferrals
Amortization
Impact from annual assumption review
Total fee income
Sales by Product
IUL/UL
MoneyGuard®
VUL
Term
Executive Benefits
Total sales
Net Flows
Deposits
Withdrawals and deaths
Net flows
Policyholder Assessments
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,300 $
1,495
32
(1,075)
258
–
3,010 $
2,258 $
1,539
30
(1,061)
233
(4)
2,995 $
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
119 $
98
132
100
93
542 $
135 $
94
163
177
136
705 $
2,362
1,525
31
(989)
191
1
3,121
104
101
181
152
122
660
5,385 $
(1,767)
3,618 $
5,821 $
(1,698)
4,123 $
5,728
(1,651)
4,077
5,476 $
5,434 $
5,322
61
Account Balances (1)
General account
Separate account
Total account balances
In-Force Face Amount
UL and other
Term insurance
Total in-force face amount
Average General Account Balances (1)
(1) Net of reinsurance ceded.
$
$
$
$
$
2023
As of December 31,
2022
2021
21,403 $
20,088
41,491 $
32,136 $
16,499
48,635 $
32,618
19,192
51,810
365,938 $
722,620
1,088,558 $
363,884 $
707,747
1,071,631 $
362,106
611,854
973,960
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
30,606 $
32,284 $
36,223
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender
charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and
expense assessments are deducted from our policyholders’ account balances. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the
product and premiums received, face amount in force and account balances.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current
quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the
year with the fourth quarter being our strongest.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
• UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
• MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL), 15% of total expected premium deposits, and MoneyGuard Market
AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
• Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium
received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
• Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to
our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability
of our segment.
62
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real
estate and other, net of investment expenses
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)
Alternative investments (2)
Surplus investments (3)
Total net investment income
Interest Credited
$
2,346 $
2,366 $
2,512
6
207
153
2,712 $
37
48
136
2,587 $
46
522
127
3,207
1,290 $
1,310 $
1,457
$
$
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional
information.
(2) See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.
(3) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income
on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting
product liabilities.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to policyholder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at
a faster rate than account balances because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory
reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve
requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a
spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts.
Investment income partially offsets the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves. Commercial mortgage loan
prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to
period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying
trends.
63
Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits and policyholder remeasurement (gain) loss (dollars in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain)
Loss
Death claims direct and assumed
Death claims ceded
Reserves released on death
Net death benefits
Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product
$
reserves:
Change in reserves
Impact from annual assumption review
Change in MoneyGuard® reserves:
Change in reserves
Impact from annual assumption review
Change in traditional product reserves:
Change in reserves
Impact from annual assumption review
Other benefits (1)
5,412 $
(2,097)
(622)
2,693
5,440 $
(2,110)
(609)
2,721
751
172
524
37
202
(11)
215
688
2,438
456
167
205
62
188
5,866
(2,325)
(708)
2,833
688
(176)
476
17
106
(3)
178
Total benefits and policyholder remeasurement
(gain) loss
$
Death claims per $1,000 of in-force
4,583 $
2.49
6,925 $
2.66
4,119
3.05
(1) Includes primarily long-term care claims and life surrender benefits.
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and
traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee, linked-benefit and term life insurance product
reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing remeasurements.
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related
mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends.
64
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions
General and administrative expenses
Expenses associated with reserve financing
Taxes, licenses and fees
Total expenses incurred
DAC and VOBA deferrals
Total expenses recognized before amortization
DAC and VOBA amortization
Amortization
Impact from annual assumption review
Other intangible amortization
Total commissions and other expenses
$
571 $
617
102
150
1,440
(671)
769
492
–
4
1,265 $
698 $
554
105
159
1,516
(805)
711
482
(4)
4
1,193 $
639
575
100
165
1,479
(745)
734
473
3
4
1,214
DAC and VOBA Deferrals
As a percentage of sales
123.9 %
114.2 %
112.9 %
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are
deferred to the extent recoverable. For our interest-sensitive and traditional products, DAC and VOBA are amortized on a constant
level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for
calculating the related policyholder liability balances.
65
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums
Net investment income
Other revenues (1)
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses
Benefits
Interest credited
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Commissions and other expenses
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) from operations before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from operations
$
$
5,014 $
339
210
5,563
4,020
5
(288)
1,447
5,184
379
80
299 $
4,768 $
334
202
5,304
4,034
5
(103)
1,316
5,252
52
11
41 $
4,450
365
180
4,995
4,069
6
(163)
1,291
5,203
(208)
(44)
(164)
(1) Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in
commissions and other expenses.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line
Life
Disability
Dental
Income (loss) from operations
$
$
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
70 $
237
(8)
299 $
15 $
27
(1)
41 $
(256)
98
(6)
(164)
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
• Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force.
•
Lower total benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss driven by more favorable discount rate impacts on new
claims, lower incidence in our disability and life businesses and the impact from our annual assumption review.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-
related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations and higher commissions due to growth in business in force.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on our reserve adjustments.
Additional Information
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect
normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently uncertain. For every one percent increase in the total loss
ratio, we would expect an annual decrease to income from operations of approximately $38 million to $42 million. The effects are
symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
66
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.” For information on the current
interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Insurance Premiums by Product Line
Life
Disability
Dental
Total insurance premiums
Sales by Product Line
Life
Disability
Dental
Total sales
$
$
$
1,938 $
2,892
184
5,014 $
333
311
49
693 $
1,808 $
2,763
197
4,768 $
299
337
40
676 $
1,653
2,569
228
4,450
264
284
38
586
Our cost of insurance and policy administration charges are embedded in the premiums charged to our customers. The premiums are a
function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency
experience.
Sales relate to new policyholders and new coverages sold to existing policyholders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important
indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our
products.
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance
premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real
estate and other, net of investment expenses
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)
Surplus investments (2)
Total net investment income
$
$
268 $
254 $
1
70
339 $
6
74
334 $
236
16
113
365
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional
information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income
on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting
product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative
investments.
67
Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits, interest credited, policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss (in millions) and loss ratios by product line
were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder
Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss by
Product Line
Life
Disability
Dental
Total benefits, interest credited and policyholder
liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Loss Ratios by Product Line
Life
Disability
Dental
Total
$
$
1,434 $
2,163
140
1,437 $
2,354
145
1,630
2,108
174
3,737 $
3,936 $
3,912
74.0 %
74.8 %
76.1 %
74.5 %
79.5 %
85.2 %
73.5 %
82.5 %
98.6 %
82.0 %
76.3 %
87.9 %
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due
to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends. For additional information
on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions
General and administrative expenses
Taxes, licenses and fees
Total expenses incurred
DAC deferrals
$
Total expenses recognized before amortization
DAC amortization
Other intangible amortization
Total commissions and other expenses
$
446
849
133
1,428
(113)
1,315
100
32
1,447
$
$
394
768
123
1,285
(99)
1,186
97
33
1,316
$
$
361
731
120
1,212
(91)
1,121
138
32
1,291
DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of insurance premiums
2.3 %
2.1 %
2.0 %
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are
deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the
groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain broker
commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
68
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Operating Revenues
Fee income
Net investment income
Other revenues (1)
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses
Interest credited
Commissions and other expenses
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) from operations before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from operations
$
$
262 $
1,012
36
1,310
665
444
1,109
201
30
171 $
261 $
976
37
1,274
629
398
1,027
247
36
211 $
295
991
36
1,322
616
406
1,022
300
52
248
(1) Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to higher commissions and other expenses driven by compensation-
related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
Additional Information
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not
significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other
component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances
caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account balances were 12%,
11% and 12% for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net
Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the
fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account balances
was 15%, 17% and 18% for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower
returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or
semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the
time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through
portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our
fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate
spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low
interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain
statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our
profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate
environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
69
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Fee Income
Annuity expense assessments
Mutual fund fees
Total expense assessments
Surrender charges
Total fee income
$
$
191 $
69
260
2
262 $
192 $
68
260
1
261 $
218
77
295
–
295
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance and administrative expenses, and mutual
fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account balances, both
fixed and variable, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account balance-related items
such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity policyholders surrender their contracts
during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real
estate and other, net of investment expenses
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond
make-whole premiums (1)
Surplus investments (2)
Total net investment income
Interest Credited
$
$
$
935 $
883 $
1
76
1,012 $
23
70
976 $
665 $
629 $
828
58
105
991
616
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional
information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income
on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting
product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative
investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of
variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting
the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity
policyholders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond
make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period
to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying
trends.
70
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
Variable Account Balance Information (1)
Variable annuity deposits
Variable annuity net flows
Variable annuity account balances
Average daily variable annuity account balances
Average daily S&P 500® Index (2)
Fixed Account Balance Information (3)
Fixed annuity deposits
Fixed annuity net flows
Fixed annuity account balances
Average fixed account balances
Mutual Fund Account Balance Information
Mutual fund deposits
Mutual fund net flows
Mutual fund account balances (4)
As of or For the Years Ended
December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
$
$
2,268 $
(240)
19,668
18,183
4,285
2,776 $
(1,718)
23,784
24,502
6,734 $
2,090
57,533
2,348 $
11
16,885
17,946
4,100
4,012 $
433
25,138
24,558
6,542 $
2,252
46,707
2,218
(731)
20,947
20,147
4,269
3,121
(353)
23,579
23,143
6,296
1,323
54,518
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account balances. The account balances of
our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to,
domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Includes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(4) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any
ownership interest in them.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net Flows By Market
Small market
Mid – large market
Multi-Fund® and other
Total net flows
$
$
382 $
1,279
(1,529)
132 $
295 $
3,601
(1,200)
2,696 $
133
1,573
(1,467)
239
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
71
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Commissions and Other Expenses
Commissions:
Deferrable
Non-deferrable
General and administrative expenses
Taxes, licenses and fees
Total expenses incurred
DAC deferrals
$
Total expenses recognized before amortization
DAC amortization
Total commissions and other expenses
$
4
83
341
19
447
(21)
426
18
444
$
$
4
75
303
17
399
(21)
378
20
398
$
$
5
79
308
17
409
(22)
387
19
406
DAC Deferrals
As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits
0.4 %
0.3 %
0.4 %
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are
deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the
groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of
commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred.
72
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Operating Revenues
Insurance premiums (1)
Net investment income
Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on
business sold through reinsurance
Other revenues
Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses
Benefits
Interest credited
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Other expenses
Interest and debt expense
Spark program expense
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) from operations before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from operations
$
$
(921) $
148
1
17
(755)
(863)
36
(3)
117
331
153
(229)
(526)
(115)
(411) $
8 $
155
—
(7)
156
63
39
3
203
283
167
758
(602)
(116)
(486) $
18
148
—
15
181
76
42
1
189
262
87
657
(476)
(105)
(371)
(1) Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for Other Operations decreased due primarily to the following:
• Lower other expenses primarily driven by lower legal expenses compared to 2022, which included a one-time item, partially offset by
higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
• Higher other revenues due to the effect of market fluctuations on assets held as part of certain compensation plans, which increased
during 2023 compared to a decrease during 2022.
• Lower Spark program expense as part of our Spark Initiative.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in average interest
rates.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-
force institutional pension business. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force
institutional pension business that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction,
which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on
capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory
reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment
income would be negatively affected.
73
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not
included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business
segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our
business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in
2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in the
consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for
this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest
earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
General and administrative expenses:
Legal
Branding
Other (1)
Total general and administrative expenses
Taxes, licenses and fees (2)
Other (3)
Total other expenses
$
$
– $
42
73
115
5
(3)
117 $
156 $
43
10
209
(3)
(3)
203 $
94
45
61
200
(9)
(2)
189
(1) Includes the portion of our deferred compensation plan expense attributable to participants’ selection of LNC stock as the measure
for their investment return, expenses that are corporate in nature including charitable contributions and other expenses not allocated
to our business segments.
(2) Includes state guaranty funds assessments to cover losses to policyholders of insolvent or rehabilitated insurance companies.
Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states.
(3) Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain
issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its
access to a financing facility and issuance of letters of credit.
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash, the
availability of funds from our inter-company cash management program and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our
financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
74
Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Percentage of
Total Investments
As of
December 31,
2023
As of
December 31,
2022
As of
December 31,
2023
As of
December 31,
2022
$
$
88,738 $
2,359
306
18,963
2,476
6,474
3,377
1,638
124,331 $
99,736
3,498
427
18,301
2,359
3,594
3,021
718
131,654
71.4 %
1.9 %
0.2 %
15.3 %
2.0 %
5.2 %
2.7 %
1.3 %
100.0 %
75.8 %
2.7 %
0.3 %
13.9 %
1.8 %
2.7 %
2.3 %
0.5 %
100.0 %
Investments
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Policy loans
Derivative investments
Alternative investments
Other investments
Total investments
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk
management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well
as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while
still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based
upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk
management process, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is
composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly-owned or in joint ventures) and other long-
term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into
account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of
our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
75
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by
industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity
AFS securities in Note 4; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio.
Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 4.
As of December 31, 2023
Net
Amortized
Cost (1)
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Fair
Value
%
Fair
Value
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
Industry corporate bonds:
Financial services
Basic industry
Capital goods
Communications
Consumer cyclical
Consumer non-cyclical
Energy
Technology
Transportation
Industrial other
Utilities
Government-related entities
Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”):
Agency backed
Non-agency backed
Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”):
Agency backed
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”):
Agency backed
Non-agency backed
Asset-backed securities (“ABS”):
Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”)
Credit card
Home equity
Other
Municipals:
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Government:
United States
Foreign
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading Securities (2)
Equity Securities
Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities
$
13,488
3,159
5,635
3,197
5,225
13,644
3,060
4,526
3,205
1,933
11,320
1,265
1,104
341
15.2 %
3.6 %
6.4 %
3.6 %
5.9 %
15.4 %
3.4 %
5.1 %
3.6 %
2.2 %
12.8 %
1.4 %
1.2 %
0.4 %
328
0.4 %
0.0 %
1.6 %
9.1 %
0.1 %
0.2 %
4.3 %
3.1 %
0.0 %
0.4 %
0.3 %
0.3 %
100.0 %
2
1,422
8,072
119
201
3,779
2,757
33
393
283
247
88,738
2,359
306
91,403
$
14,767 $
3,426
6,143
3,509
5,660
15,356
3,331
4,994
3,487
2,296
12,683
1,425
133 $
58
83
63
60
196
38
32
35
7
121
26
1,412 $
325
591
375
495
1,908
309
500
317
370
1,484
186
1,245
332
365
2
1,620
8,452
113
175
3,954
3,072
34
8
19
1
–
5
9
7
28
18
100
1
149
10
38
–
203
389
1
2
193
415
2
416
314
243
97,414
2,515
340
100,269 $
6
16
21
1,091
55
8
1,154 $
29
47
17
9,767
211
42
10,020 $
76
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
Industry corporate bonds:
Financial services
Basic industry
Capital goods
Communications
Consumer cyclical
Consumer non-cyclical
Energy
Technology
Transportation
Industrial other
Utilities
Government-related entities
CMOs:
Agency backed
Non-agency backed
MPTS:
Agency backed
CMBS:
Agency backed
Non-agency backed
ABS:
CLOs
Credit card
Home equity
Other
Municipals:
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Government:
United States
Foreign
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading Securities (2)
Equity Securities
As of December 31, 2022
Net
Amortized
Cost (1)
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Fair
Value
%
Fair
Value
$
17,762 $
4,352
7,374
4,239
6,056
17,080
4,776
5,581
3,666
2,330
14,204
1,820
133 $
45
63
72
40
184
53
27
19
3
111
37
1,998 $
478
884
519
698
2,395
485
675
421
416
1,822
213
1,451
364
394
15
1,902
8,497
85
196
3,014
5,319
91
3
18
1
–
3
1
6
27
4
171
1
166
14
42
–
246
671
1
4
250
506
6
15,897
3,919
6,553
3,792
5,398
14,869
4,344
4,933
3,264
1,917
12,493
1,644
1,288
368
15.9 %
3.9 %
6.6 %
3.8 %
5.4 %
14.9 %
4.4 %
4.9 %
3.3 %
1.9 %
12.5 %
1.6 %
1.3 %
0.4 %
353
0.4 %
15
1,659
7,827
90
219
2,768
4,984
86
0.0 %
1.7 %
7.8 %
0.1 %
0.2 %
2.8 %
5.0 %
0.1 %
0.4 %
0.3 %
0.4 %
100.0 %
405
348
364
111,685
3,833
383
115,901 $
5
17
25
1,069
44
104
1,217 $
31
47
30
13,018
379
60
13,457 $
379
318
359
99,736
3,498
427
103,661
Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities
$
(1) Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2) Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment
results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
77
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were
actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized
gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to future contract benefits, policyholder account balances and
deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to AOCI. For instance, deferred income tax
balances are adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS
securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
NAIC
Designation (1)
Rating Agency
Equivalent
Designation (1)
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
% of
Total
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
% of
Total
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Investment Grade Securities
1
2
AAA / AA / A
BBB
Total investment grade securities
Below Investment Grade Securities
3
4
5
6
BB
B
CCC and lower
In or near default
Total below investment grade securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
Total securities below investment grade
as a percentage of total fixed maturity
AFS securities
$ 56,557
37,832
94,389
$ 51,234
34,614
85,848
57.7 % $ 63,741
39.0 %
44,103
96.7 % 107,844
$ 56,892
39,230
96,122
1,176
1,760
86
3
3,025
$ 97,414
1,090
1,719
78
3
2,890
$ 88,738
1.2 %
2.0 %
0.1 %
0.0 %
3.3 %
2,101
1,679
59
2
3,841
100.0 % $ 111,685
1,938
1,620
53
3
3,614
$ 99,736
57.0 %
39.4 %
96.4 %
1.9 %
1.6 %
0.1 %
0.0 %
3.6 %
100.0 %
3.1 %
3.3 %
3.4 %
3.6 %
(1) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or
the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)).
For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is
used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant
amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities
quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations
are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC
designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by
S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by
the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory
reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s,
or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 97% of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade.
See Note 4 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on
fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2023, decreased by $3.3 billion since December 31, 2022, which was driven by declining
interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2023 and the transfer of assets as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. For further
information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses
on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.
78
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including
those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31,
2023, did not require an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not
more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and
(iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent
with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
• The current economic environment and market conditions;
• Our business strategy and current business plans;
• The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
• Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging
and overall risk management strategies;
• The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments
and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of annuity contracts and life insurance policies;
• The capital risk limits approved by management; and
• Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(22) million and $(15) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the years ended
December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by
performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the
recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
• Historical and implied volatility of the security;
• The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
• Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
• Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
• Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For information on credit loss impairment on fixed maturity AFS securities, see Notes 1, 4 and 21.
As reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $134.5 billion of liabilities for future obligations under insurance policies and
contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers, which exceeded investments and cash and invested cash, which totaled
$127.7 billion as of December 31, 2023. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet
cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value
of $26.8 billion as of December 31, 2023, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of
cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the
maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business.
For additional discussion, see “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 and “Liquidity
and Capital Resources” below.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $20.6 billion and $19.0 billion,
respectively, representing 17% and 14% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair
value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains
and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting
these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying
reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 8 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable
prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time
of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will
incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate
an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the
securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either
gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages
79
backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall
securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities
with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in
securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either
guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at
discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by
subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are
backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of
creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent
credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack
documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the
unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in
accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of
the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or
most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, our ABS home equity and
RMBS had a market value of $2.0 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, and a net unrealized gain (loss) of $(155) million and
$(195) million, respectively.
80
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $176 million and represented less than 1%
of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2023. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $169 million, or 96%, and trading
securities represented $7 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2023. The table below summarizes our
investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2023:
Agency
Prime
Alt-A
Subprime/
Option ARM (1)
Total
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
$
1,609 $ 1,431 $
–
–
1,609 $ 1,431 $
182 $ 178 $
17
199 $ 195 $
17
56 $
13
69 $
61 $
20
81 $
95 $ 103 $
145
240 $ 267 $
164
1,942 $ 1,773
201
2,117 $ 1,974
175
$
1,324 $ 1,185 $
285
–
–
–
246
–
–
–
$
1,609 $ 1,431 $
77 $
15
8
21
74
79 $
15
8
25
72
199 $ 195 $
$
337 $ 326 $
50
130
383
157
148
153
63
115
46
27
46
116
322
137
138
126
52
97
44
27
75 $
–
15
–
–
–
–
3
26
62
18
77 $
–
15
–
–
–
–
3
22
60
18
– $
2
1
3
63
69 $
69 $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– $
2
1
3
75
81 $
81 $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– $
5
3
12
247
– $
5
3
11
221
240 $ 267 $
1,403 $ 1,262
268
12
36
396
2,117 $ 1,974
307
12
39
356
240 $ 267 $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
721 $ 751
46
50
131
145
322
383
137
157
138
148
126
153
55
66
119
141
104
108
45
45
$
1,609 $ 1,431 $
199 $ 195 $
69 $
81 $
240 $ 267 $
2,117 $ 1,974
Type
RMBS
ABS home equity
Total by type (2)(3)
Rating
AAA
AA
A
BBB
BB and below
Total by rating (2)(3)(4)
Origination Year
2013 and prior
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total by origination
year (2)(3)
Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages
as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities
Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities
2.2 % 2.2 %
0.5 % 0.6 %
(1) Includes the net amortized cost and fair value of option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”) within RMBS, totaling $91 million and
$98 million, respectively.
(2) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $62 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld
and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The
$62 million in trading securities consisted of $53 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $8 million subprime.
(3) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $52 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and
modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The
$52 million in trading securities consisted of $44 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $7 million subprime.
(4) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For
securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used.
For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount
of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
81
None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to
subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of
December 31, 2023:
Type
CMBS (1)(2)
Rating
AAA
AA
A
Total by rating (1)(2)(3)
Origination Year
2013 and prior
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total by origination year (1)(2)
Multiple Property
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
Single Property
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
Total
Net
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
$
1,558 $
1,371 $
64 $
53 $
1,622 $
1,424
$
$
$
$
1,077 $
477
4
1,558 $
981 $
387
3
1,371 $
11 $
15
27
72
198
140
323
251
246
158
117
1,558 $
10 $
14
25
66
185
133
289
203
189
140
117
1,371 $
16 $
45
3
64 $
7 $
–
–
1
–
–
–
3
36
13
4
64 $
15 $
36
2
53 $
6 $
–
–
1
–
–
–
2
28
12
4
53 $
1,093 $
522
7
1,622 $
18 $
15
27
73
198
140
323
254
282
171
121
1,622 $
996
423
5
1,424
16
14
25
67
185
133
289
205
217
152
121
1,424
1.7 %
1.6 %
Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial
mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $125 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld
and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The
$125 million in trading securities consisted of $85 million of multiple property CMBS and $40 million of single property CMBS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $104 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and
modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The
$104 million in trading securities consisted of $70 million of multiple property CMBS and $34 million of single property CMBS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For
securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used.
For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount
of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of
securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance
sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which
securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of
the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in
any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings.
82
The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31,
2023, was as follows:
Net
Amortized
Cost
%
Net
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
%
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Healthcare
Electric
ABS
Technology
Banking
Food and beverage
Local authorities
Industrial – other
Diversified manufacturing
Natural gas
Brokerage asset management
Pharmaceuticals
Chemicals
Retail
Transportation services
Non-agency CMBS
Life insurance
Property and casualty
Utility – other
Aerospace and defense
Midstream
Consumer products
Government-sponsored
Wirelines
Automotive
Railroads
Wireless
Integrated
Industries with unrealized losses
less than $100 million
Total by industry
$
4,833
6,183
9,368
3,610
4,804
3,018
1,673
1,875
1,910
1,434
1,602
1,809
1,515
1,429
2,029
1,364
961
1,244
1,032
1,119
1,257
927
484
670
1,195
663
645
512
6.8 % $
8.6 %
13.1 %
5.0 %
6.7 %
4.2 %
2.3 %
2.6 %
2.7 %
2.0 %
2.2 %
2.5 %
2.1 %
2.0 %
2.8 %
1.9 %
1.4 %
1.7 %
1.4 %
1.6 %
1.8 %
1.3 %
0.7 %
0.9 %
1.7 %
0.9 %
0.9 %
0.7 %
12,537
71,702
$
17.5 %
100.0 % $
1,053
1,009
569
500
491
453
423
376
255
238
236
235
211
205
203
202
187
187
155
151
142
135
122
117
114
107
101
93
1,497
9,767
Fair Value
3,780
5,174
8,799
3,110
4,313
2,565
1,250
1,499
1,655
1,196
1,366
1,574
1,304
1,224
1,826
1,162
774
1,057
877
968
1,115
792
362
553
1,081
556
544
419
10.8 % $
10.3 %
5.8 %
5.1 %
5.1 %
4.6 %
4.3 %
3.8 %
2.6 %
2.4 %
2.4 %
2.4 %
2.2 %
2.1 %
2.1 %
2.1 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
1.6 %
1.6 %
1.5 %
1.4 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
1.1 %
1.0 %
1.0 %
%
Fair Value
6.1 %
8.4 %
14.2 %
5.0 %
7.0 %
4.2 %
2.0 %
2.4 %
2.7 %
1.9 %
2.2 %
2.6 %
2.1 %
2.0 %
2.8 %
1.9 %
1.2 %
1.7 %
1.4 %
1.6 %
1.8 %
1.3 %
0.6 %
0.9 %
1.7 %
0.9 %
0.9 %
0.7 %
15.3 %
100.0 % $
11,040
61,935
17.8 %
100.0 %
Total by industry as a percentage of
total fixed maturity AFS securities
73.6 %
100.0 %
69.8 %
83
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
Credit Quality Indicator
Current
Delinquent (1)
Foreclosure (2)
Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance
Allowance for credit losses
Total mortgage loans on real estate
Credit Quality Indicator
Current
Delinquent (1)
Foreclosure (2)
Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance
Allowance for credit losses
Total mortgage loans on real estate
As of December 31, 2023
Commercial
Residential
Total
%
$
$
17,273 $
–
–
17,273
(86)
17,187 $
1,742 $
21
41
1,804
(28)
1,776 $
19,015
21
41
19,077
(114)
18,963
99.7 %
0.1 %
0.2 %
100.0 %
As of December 31, 2022
Commercial
Residential
Total
%
$
$
16,987 $
–
–
16,987
(84)
16,903 $
1,379 $
13
21
1,413
(15)
1,398 $
18,366
13
21
18,400
(99)
18,301
99.8 %
0.1 %
0.1 %
100.0 %
(1) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 34 and 24 residential mortgage loans, respectively, were
delinquent.
(2) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 82 and 49 residential mortgage loans, respectively, were in
foreclosure.
As of December 31, 2023, there were 3 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate
carrying value of $2 million and 99 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying
value of $47 million. As of December 31, 2022, there were 2 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate
with an aggregate carrying value of less than $1 million and 37 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate
with an aggregate carrying value of $16 million.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent,
excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, was less than $1 million. The total outstanding principal and interest on
residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2023
and 2022, was $20 million and $13 million, respectively.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
Segment
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total mortgage loans on real estate
As of
December 31,
2023
As of
December 31,
2022
7,362 $
3,675
1,550
4,813
1,563
18,963 $
7,008
3,536
1,417
4,253
2,087
18,301
$
$
84
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
As of December 31, 2023
Carrying
Value
%
As of December 31, 2023
Carrying
Value
%
Property Type
Apartment
Industrial
Office building
Retail
Other commercial
Hotel/motel
Mixed use
Total
Geographic Region
Pacific
South Atlantic
Middle Atlantic
West South Central
Mountain
East North Central
East South Central
West North Central
New England
Non U.S.
Total
$
$
$
5,602
4,487
3,359
2,674
765
163
137
17,187
5,629
3,627
2,046
1,753
1,441
1,172
678
456
357
28
17,187
32.6 %
26.1 %
19.5 %
15.6 %
4.5 %
0.9 %
0.8 %
100.0 %
32.8 %
21.1 %
11.9 %
10.2 %
8.4 %
6.8 %
3.9 %
2.6 %
2.1 %
0.2 %
100.0 %
State
CA
TX
FL
NY
AZ
PA
WA
GA
MD
TN
NC
OH
VA
NJ
WI
OR
SC
Non U.S.
All other states
Total
$
$
4,613
1,612
952
886
830
783
692
676
663
553
448
384
381
378
355
325
299
28
2,329
17,187
26.8 %
9.4 %
5.5 %
5.2 %
4.8 %
4.6 %
4.0 %
3.9 %
3.9 %
3.2 %
2.6 %
2.2 %
2.2 %
2.2 %
2.1 %
1.9 %
1.7 %
0.2 %
13.6 %
100.0 %
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the
principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
Principal Repayment Year
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029 and thereafter
Total
As of December 31, 2023
Commercial
Residential
Total
%
$
$
922 $
1,029
1,401
1,737
2,151
10,077
17,317 $
25 $
25
26
27
28
1,631
1,762 $
947
1,054
1,427
1,764
2,179
11,708
19,079
5.0 %
5.5 %
7.5 %
9.2 %
11.4 %
61.4 %
100.0 %
See Note 4 for information regarding our loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
85
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total (1)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
$
16 $
207
9
10
1
243 $
8 $
47
5
4
2
66 $
63
522
41
38
15
679
(1) Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, alternative investments included investments in 352 and 337 different partnerships, respectively, and
the portfolio represented approximately 3% and 2% of total investments, respectively. The partnerships do not represent off-balance
sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to
contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and
are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative
investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that
were non-income producing was $79 million and $11 million, respectively.
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Policy loans
Cash and invested cash
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums (1)
Alternative investments (2)
Consent fees
Other investments
Investment income
Investment expense
Net investment income
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
$
4,819 $
161
13
755
103
129
10
243
3
(33)
6,203
(324)
5,879 $
4,469 $
182
11
689
101
13
105
66
8
79
5,723
(208)
5,515 $
4,351
167
3
680
115
–
199
679
10
64
6,268
(157)
6,111
(1) See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
86
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Interest Rate Yield
Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on
real estate and other, net of investment expenses
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and
bond make-whole premiums
Alternative investments
Net investment income yield on invested assets
4.04 %
0.01 %
0.17 %
4.22 %
3.87 %
0.08 %
0.05 %
4.00 %
3.92 %
0.15 %
0.51 %
4.58 %
We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life
and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected
by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest
credited to the contract holder on our average fixed account balances, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and
the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments
and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a
number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A
prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments
until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance
companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek annuity and life reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to
mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and
limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. The consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” reflect insurance premiums, insurance fees, benefits and DAC amortization net of
insurance ceded. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable
reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge
program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not
have an effect on the consolidated financial statements. For information regarding reserve financing and LOC expenses from inter-
company reinsurance agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Material Cash Outflows” below.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and
selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an
AM Best rating of A+ or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If
the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral
requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability
risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified
quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to
indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding
company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive
reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable,
unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated
funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must
be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries
require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
As a result of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld agreements, we reported deposit assets, net of allowances
for credit losses of $28.8 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023. For additional information, see Note 8.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2023, 86%, or
$25.6 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $24.7 billion was held by
87
reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets), $121 million was held in our funds withheld portfolios and $813 million was secured by LOCs for which
we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement. We reported funds withheld reinsurance liabilities of $17.6 billion on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023. The excess funds withheld represent funds above the reinsurance recoverable
from our reinsurers.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all
of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and
commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging
and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the
Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A.
Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could
materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New
York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,”
remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as
the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained,
depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs
at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.6 billion of statutory
reserves as of December 31, 2023. LNL must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength
rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust
equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $1.0 billion
of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2023. LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P
financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least
160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by
which we established $585 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2023, LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength
rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of
these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of
these arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial
Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 8 and 18 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses
of Liquidity and Capital –Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and
“Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent
margin of safety. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic
conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding
company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its
insurance subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may
be affected by factors influencing the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and statutory earnings performance. Based on the sources of liquidity
available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs.
Capital
Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to
support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient capital depends on the profitability of
our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described
below. Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may materially affect our business operations and results of
operations and may adversely affect our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC.
88
Reductions to our subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC may cause them to retain more capital, which may pressure their ability to pay
dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. We believe we have adequate capital to operate
our business as we replenish statutory capital back to our targeted levels. For more information, see “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for
liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments,
issuance of debt or other types of securities and policyholder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed
below. Our primary uses are to pay policy claims and benefits, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase
investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our common and preferred stockholders, to repurchase our
common stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $(2.1) billion, $3.6 billion and $(217) million in 2023,
2022 and 2021, respectively.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries,
augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing
under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities,
preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources support
the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common and preferred stock dividends, common stock repurchases,
interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Dividends from Subsidiaries
LNL
First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company
Lincoln Investment Management Company
Lincoln National Management Corporation
Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited
$
Total dividends from subsidiaries
$
495 $
15
25
–
150
685 $
645 $
22
38
7
85
797 $
1,910
45
20
10
75
2,060
Interest from Subsidiaries
Interest on inter-company notes
$
147 $
118 $
111
See Note 24 for information on the increase in dividends from LNL in 2021. The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash
flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, issuance of
preferred stock, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital
contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing
agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from
this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise
activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule
II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of
dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary
insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the
“Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend,
along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current
statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the
Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory
89
unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits.
LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the
applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately
preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains.
Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in
relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a
dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is
inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from
another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $790 million in 2024 without prior
approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is
constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for
future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and
surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity,
market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’
ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or
at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios
and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and
Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of
capital.”
Subsidiaries’ Capital
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital
adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength
ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus will affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying
capacity. For a discussion of the actions management is taking to rebuild statutory capital, see “Introduction – Executive Summary –
Significant Operational Matters – Protect and Rebuild Statutory Capital.” For additional information on RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1.
Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our insurance subsidiaries’ regulatory capital levels are affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each
applicable insurance regulator. For instance, our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves
calculated pursuant to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) and Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”),
respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to
reinsurance captives. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess
reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including
paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance
those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2023, was $1.9 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-
company reinsurance agreements for UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see the credit
facilities table in Note 14. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.8 billion to finance
a portion of the excess reserves associated with our term and UL products with secondary guarantees as of December 31, 2023; of this
amount, $3.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and
reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 5. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term
structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market
solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves established for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates
and are affected by the level of account balances relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As
a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Our
insurance subsidiaries’ cede a portion of the guaranteed benefit riders to Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited
(“LNBAR”) through a modified coinsurance agreement. Our variable annuity hedge program mitigates the risk to LNBAR from
guaranteed benefit riders and continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing
distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect
on the valuation of reserves and supporting derivatives. In December 2022, LNC issued a long-term note to a non-affiliated variable
interest entity in exchange for notes of like principal and duration classified as AFS securities. LNC contributed the securities to LNBAR
to address asset value volatility based on market conditions. Under the current terms of the note facility, the maximum permissible
principal amount of the note is $1.25 billion, the full amount of which was outstanding as of December 31, 2023. There are no impacts
to the LNC Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the set-off right provided in the note facility. For more information, see Note 5.
90
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital
among our insurance subsidiaries, including our captive reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our
insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and variable universal life
insurance separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance
subsidiaries also increases. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our
insurance subsidiaries may also decrease, which will affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than
the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
We continue to analyze the use of our existing captive reinsurance structures, as well as additional third-party reinsurance arrangements,
and our hedging strategies relative to managing the effects of equity markets and interest rates on the statutory reserves, statutory capital
and the dividend capacity of our life insurance subsidiaries.
In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re, with an effective date of October 1, 2023, which improved
our statutory capital position. For more information, see Notes 4 and 8.
In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through LFN,
which is expected to close in the first half of 2024. We anticipate that the capital benefit from this transaction will be used to improve our
statutory capital position and reduce our leverage ratio. For more information, see “Results of Annuities” above and Note 1.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue
debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2023, were as follows:
Beginning
Balance
Issuance
Maturities,
Repayments
and
Refinancing
Change in
Fair Value
Hedges
Other
Changes (1)
Ending
Balance
Short-Term Debt
Current maturities of long-term debt (2)
Long-Term Debt
Senior notes
Term loans
Subordinated notes (3)
Capital securities (3)
Total long-term debt
$
$
$
500 $
– $
(500) $
– $
250 $
250
4,497 $
250
995
213
5,955 $
– $
–
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
–
– $
5 $
–
–
–
5 $
(11) $
(250)
–
–
(261) $
4,491
–
995
213
5,699
(1) Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts
and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2) As of December 31, 2023, consisted of $250 million principal amount of our term loan due December 3, 2024.
(3) To hedge the variability in rates, we purchased interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining
terms of the subordinated notes and capital securities.
LNC made interest payments to service debt to third parties of $311 million, $278 million and $269 million for the years ended December
31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities, see Note 14.
Preferred Stock
In November 2022, we raised approximately $1 billion through the issuance of preferred stock, $780 million of which was contributed to
LNL in the fourth quarter of 2022 to strengthen LNL’s statutory capital. We used the remaining proceeds to fund part of the repayment
upon maturity of our 4.00% Senior Notes due September 1, 2023. For additional information, see Note 19.
91
Details underlying preferred stock dividends paid (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Series C preferred stock dividends
Series D preferred stock dividends
Total preferred stock dividends
Capital Contributions to Subsidiaries
$
$
36 $
46
82 $
– $
–
– $
–
–
–
LNC made capital contributions to subsidiaries of $7 million, $925 million and $65 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022
and 2021, respectively.
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock
repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings,
capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchases
depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of dividends from our subsidiaries and an evaluation of the costs
and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our buyback program
during 2023. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II – Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Dividends to common stockholders
Repurchase of common stock
Total cash returned to common stockholders
$
$
305 $
–
305 $
310 $
550
860 $
Number of shares repurchased
–
8.7
319
1,105
1,424
16.2
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
To promote effective short-term cash management strategies, we utilize an inter-company cash management program between LNC and
participating subsidiaries under which each entity can lend to or borrow from the holding company to meet short-term borrowing needs.
As of December 31, 2023, the holding company had a net receivable of $258 million due from certain subsidiaries in the inter-company
cash management program. Loans under the cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain
restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s
admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2%
of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
LNC entered into a facility agreement in 2020 with a Delaware trust that gives LNC the right over a 10-year period to issue, from time to
time, up to $500 million of 2.330% senior notes to the trust in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by
the trust. By agreeing to purchase the 2.330% senior notes in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities upon exercise of the issuance right,
the trust will provide a source of liquid assets for the Company. The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure
to make certain payments to the trust, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving LNC.
We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below a
minimum threshold (which was $2.75 billion as of December 31, 2023, and is subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases)
and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement. For additional information, see Note 14.
92
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”).
Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as
an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities.
Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of
December 31, 2023, LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility and maximum available
borrowing based on qualifying assets of $5.1 billion. As of December 31, 2023, LNL had outstanding borrowings of $2.7 billion under
this facility reported within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings
under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31,
2023, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on
Investments” in Note 4.
Securities Lending Programs and Repurchase Agreements
Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can access liquidity through securities
lending programs and repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2023, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under
securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $205 million. In addition, our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to
$2.25 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which $25 million was utilized as of December 31, 2023. The cash received in
our securities lending programs and repurchase agreements is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.
For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with
counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract
changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures
hedged. As of December 31, 2023, we were in a net collateral payable position of $5.0 billion compared to $3.1 billion as of December
31, 2022. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to post collateral with a counterparty.
If we do not have sufficient high-quality securities or cash and invested cash to provide as collateral, we have committed liquidity sources
through facilities that can provide up to $1.25 billion of additional liquidity to help meet collateral needs. Access to such facilities is
contingent upon interest rates having achieved certain threshold levels. In addition to these facilities, we have the facility agreement for
senior notes issuance, the FHLB facilities and the repurchase agreements discussed above as well as the five-year revolving credit facility
discussed in Note 14 to leverage that would be eligible for collateral posting. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 6.
93
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
Future contract benefits and policyholder account balances (1)
Short-term and long-term debt (2)
Reserve financing and LOC expenses (3)
Payables for collateral on investments (4)
Investment commitments (5)
Operating leases (6)
Finance leases (6)
Certain financing arrangements (7)
Retirement and other plans (8)
Total
Less Than
1 Year
1 - 3 Years
3 - 5 Years
More than
5 Years
$
$
22,361 $
250
67
2,855
890
43
18
152
100
26,736 $
46,149 $
700
128
–
1,013
66
11
396
196
48,659 $
46,824 $
500
120
–
1,135
44
–
137
189
48,949 $
389,433 $
4,381
231
–
50
9
–
6
440
394,550 $
Total
504,767
5,831
546
2,855
3,088
162
29
691
925
518,894
(1) Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years and are not discounted for the time value of money. New business issued
or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these
amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2) Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 14 for additional information.
(3) Estimates are based on the level of capacity we expect to utilize during the life of the LOCs and other reserve financing
arrangements. See Note 14 for additional information.
(4) Excludes collateral payable held for derivative investments. See Note 4 for additional information.
(5) See Note 4 for additional information.
(6) See Note 18 for additional information.
(7) Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See
Note 18 for additional information.
(8) Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2033 and known payments
under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined
benefit plans. See Note 16 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so
actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not
disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Our credit ratings assigned by Moody’s and
S&P are on outlook stable, and our credit ratings assigned by AM Best and Fitch are on outlook negative
As of February 16, 2024, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit
are indicated in the following table.
AM Best
“aaa to c”
bbb+
(8th of 22)
Fitch
“AAA to D”
BBB+
(8th of 23)
Moody's
“Aaa to C”
Baa2
(9th of 21)
S&P
“AAA to D”
BBB+
(8th of 22)
94
As of February 16, 2024, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term
credit are indicated in the following table.
AM Best
“AMB-1+ to
AMB-4”
AMB-2
(3rd of 6)
Fitch
Moody's
S&P
“F1+ to D”
F2
(3rd of 8)
“P-1 to NP”
P-2
(2nd of 4)
“A-1+ to D”
A-2
(3rd of 7)
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given
that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and
conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could
make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries
and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business –
Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements may be
triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event
with respect to LNC if its long-term senior debt ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s); or with respect to LNL if its financial
strength ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be
negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products. See “Part I –
Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market
products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We analyze and manage the risks arising from market exposures of financial instruments, as well as other risks, in an integrated asset-
liability management process that considers diversification. By aggregating the potential effect of market and other risks on the entire
enterprise, we estimate, review and in some cases manage the risk to our earnings and shareholder value. We have exposures to several
market risks including interest rate risk, equity market risk, credit risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency exchange risk. The
exposures of financial instruments to market risks, and the related risk management processes, are most important to our business where
most of the investments support accumulation and investment-oriented insurance products. As an important element of our integrated
asset-liability management processes, we use derivatives to minimize the effects of changes in interest levels, the shape of the yield curve,
currency movements and volatility. In this context, derivatives serve to minimize interest rate risk by mitigating the effect of significant
increases in interest rates on our earnings. Additional market exposures exist in our other general account insurance products and in our
debt structure and derivatives positions. Our primary sources of market risk are substantial, relatively rapid and sustained increases or
decreases in interest rates or a sharp drop in equity market values. These market risks are discussed in detail in the following pages and
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes presented in “Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of financial loss due to adverse changes in the value of assets and liabilities due to movements in interest rates.
We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from our fixed maturity securities and interest sensitive liabilities.
With respect to accumulation and investment-oriented products, we seek to earn a stable and profitable spread, or margin, between
investment income we earn on our investments and interest credited to account balances of our contract holders. If we have adverse
experience on investments that cannot be passed on to customers, our spreads are reduced. The combination of a probable range of
interest rate changes over the next 12 months, asset-liability management strategies, flexibility in adjusting policy crediting rate levels and
protection afforded by policy surrender charges all work together to mitigate this risk. The interest rate scenarios of concern are those in
which there is a substantial, relatively prolonged decrease in interest rates that is sustained over a long period or a rapid increase in interest
rates.
95
Significant Interest Rate Exposures
The following provides a general measure of our significant interest rate risk; principal, including amortization of premiums and
discounts, notional amounts, and estimated fair values of assets, liabilities and derivatives are shown by year of maturity (dollars in
millions) as of December 31, 2023:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
Rate Sensitive Assets
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Fixed interest rate securities
Average interest rate
Variable interest rate securities
Average interest rate
Trading securities:
Fixed interest rate securities
Average interest rate
Variable interest rate securities
Average interest rate
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Total mortgage loans
Average interest rate
Rate Sensitive Liabilities
Investment type
$
$
$
$
$
4,088
3.5 %
208
10.6 %
86
5.0 %
5
2.5%
947
4.2 %
$
3,087
3.5 %
250
6.6 %
insurance contracts (1)
Average interest rate (1)
Debt
Average interest rate
Rate Sensitive Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest rate, foreign currency swaps and forwards: (4)
2,854
6.1 %
2.7 %
$
$
Pay variable/receive fixed
Average pay rate
Average receive rate
Pay fixed/receive variable
Average pay rate
Average receive rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,212
3.8 %
288
10.4 %
144
5.0 %
–
0.0%
1,054
4.0 %
2,503
3.8 %
300
3.4 %
689
5.2 %
3.4 %
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,788
3.5 %
515
10.1 %
83
4.3 %
6
7.2%
1,427
3.7 %
3,354
3.6 %
400
3.6 %
8,249
4.4 %
2.3 %
Interest rate cap corridors:
Average buy strike rate (2)
Average sell strike rate (2)
Forward swap curve
Reverse Treasury locks:
30-year on-the-run Treasury
Average strike rate
Forward CMT curve (3)
Total return swaps:
Pay variable/receive fixed
Pay fixed/receive variable
Interest rate futures:
2-year Treasury notes
5-year Treasury notes
10-year Treasury notes
Treasury bonds
$ 2,583
$ 1,155
$ 8,789
$
2.7 %
6.6 %
$ 12,300
6.0 %
10.0 %
3.5 %
$
$
$
340
3.3 %
4.0 %
164
3,609
104
20
329
139
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4.1 %
5.4 %
–
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
–
0.0%
0.0%
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
$
$
$
2.1 %
5.4 %
–
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
–
0.0%
0.0%
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,792
3.7 %
563
10.2 %
74
5.1 %
–
0.0%
1,764
4.1 %
3,892
3.8 %
–
0.0%
805
4.9 %
2.8 %
325
1.0 %
5.0 %
–
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
–
0.0%
0.0%
–
–
–
–
–
–
4,498
4.1 %
517
9.9 %
$ 70,010
4.1 %
4,954
6.9 %
$
$ 90,388
4.0 %
7,045
7.9 %
$
$
81,768
$
6,970
$
$
58
4.9 %
–
0.0%
$
$
1,658
4.8 %
401
6.4 %
$
$
2,103
4.8 %
412
6.4 %
1,967
392
2,179
4.4 %
$ 11,708
4.2 %
$ 19,079
4.2 %
$
17,407
4,235
4.2 %
500
3.8%
4,048
5.4 %
2.1 %
2,245
1.8 %
5.5 %
–
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
–
0.0%
0.0%
–
–
–
–
–
–
$ 26,845
4.1 %
$ 43,916
4.0 %
$
40,923
$ 4,381
$ 5,831
$
5,431
5.6 %
5.2 %
$
(2,881)
$
1,767
$
–
$ 28,054
5.0 %
2.5 %
$ 21,800
2.6 %
5.6 %
–
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$
$ 44,699
5.2 %
2.5 %
$ 36,897
2.5 %
5.6 %
$ 12,300
6.0 %
10.0 %
3.5 %
$
$
$
$
$
$
–
0.0%
0.0%
–
–
–
–
–
–
340
3.3 %
4.0 %
164
3,609
104
20
329
139
$
(37)
$
$
5
(129)
–
–
–
–
(1) The information shown is for our fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans on real estate that support these insurance contracts.
(2) The indexes are the 5-year and 10-year constant maturity swap.
(3) The Constant Maturity Treasury (“CMT”) curve is the applicable 5-year, 10-year or 30-year CMT forward curve.
(4) Includes notional of $290 million and fair value of $5 million that support our modified coinsurance and funds withheld reinsurance
agreements. Investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers.
96
The following provides the principal, including amortization of premiums and discounts, notional amounts, and estimated fair values of
assets, liabilities and derivatives (in millions) having significant interest rate risks as of December 31, 2022:
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Investment-type insurance contracts (1)
Debt
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps
Interest rate cap corridors
Reverse Treasury locks
Total return swaps
Interest rate futures
$
Principal /
Notional
Amount
Estimated Fair
Value
111,707 $
3,833
18,399
43,106
6,331
79,734
25,800
1,305
7,028
635
99,736
3,498
16,553
38,598
5,501
(878)
2
(230)
38
–
(1) The information shown is for our fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans on real estate that support these insurance contracts.
Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity
The following table presents our estimate of the effect on income (loss) from operations by segment (in millions) for the next 12-month
period if the level of interest rates were to instantaneously increase or decrease by 1% and remain at those levels immediately after
December 31, 2023, relative to interest rates remaining flat:
Annuities (1)
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Income (loss) from operations
1%
Increase
1%
Decrease
$
$
(20) $
7
5
–
(9)
(17) $
21
(7)
(5)
(5)
9
13
(1) Includes the impact on bond funds in our separate accounts, which move in the opposite direction of interest rates.
For purposes of this estimate, we assumed asset purchases are made at prevailing new money rates and exclude the impact of new
business, unlocking, persistency, hedge program performance, reserve discounting caused by interest rate changes or customer behavior
caused by the interest rate changes.
Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Falling Rates
In periods of declining interest rates, we have to reinvest the cash we receive as interest or return of principal on our investments in lower
yielding instruments. Moreover, borrowers may prepay fixed-income securities, commercial mortgages and MBS in our general accounts
in order to borrow at lower market rates, which exacerbates this risk. Because we are entitled to reset the interest rates on our fixed-rate
annuities only at limited, pre-established intervals, and because many of our contracts have guaranteed minimum interest or crediting
rates, our spreads could decrease and potentially become negative.
Prolonged historically low rates are not healthy for our business fundamentals. However, we have recognized this risk and have been
proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of
unfavorable consequences in this type of environment. For some time now, new products have been sold with low minimum crediting
floors, and we apply disciplined asset-liability management standards, such as locking in spreads on these products at the time of issue.
See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest
rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” for additional
information on low interest rate risks.
See Note 12 for information on excess crediting rates over contract minimums.
97
Interest Rate Risk on Fixed Insurance Businesses – Rising Rates
For both annuities and universal life insurance, a rapid rise in interest rates poses risks of deteriorating spreads and high surrenders. The
portfolios supporting these products have fixed-rate assets laddered over maturities generally ranging from 1 to 10 years or more.
Accordingly, the earned rate on each portfolio lags behind changes in market yields. As rates rise, the lag may be increased by slowing
MBS prepayments. The greater and faster the rise in interest rates, the more the earned rate will tend to lag behind market rates. If we set
renewal crediting rates to earn the desired spread, the gap between our renewal crediting rates and competitors’ new money rates may be
wide enough to cause increased surrenders that could cause us to liquidate a portion of our portfolio to fund these surrenders. If we
credit more competitive renewal rates to limit surrenders, our spreads will narrow. We devote extensive effort to evaluating these risks by
simulating asset and liability cash flows for a wide range of interest rate scenarios. Such analysis has led to adjustments in the target
maturity structure and to hedging the risk of rising rates by entering into interest rate cap corridor agreements. With these instruments in
place, the potential adverse effect of a rapid and sustained rise in rates is kept within our risk tolerances. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk
Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our
investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” for more information on the risks related to rising interest
rates.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
We manage the timing of maturities and the mixture of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt as part of the process of integrated management
of interest rate risk for the entire enterprise. See Note 14 for additional information on our debt.
Derivatives
See Note 6 for information on our derivatives used to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates.
Equity Market Risk
Equity market risk is the risk of financial loss due to changes in the value of equity securities or equity indices. Our revenues, assets and
liabilities are exposed to equity market risk that we often hedge with derivatives. However, earnings are affected by equity market
movements on account balances and the related fees we earn on those balances.
Fee Income
The fees earned from variable annuities and variable life insurance products are exposed to the risk of a decline in equity market values.
These fees are generally a fixed percentage of the market value of account balances. In a severe equity market decline, fee income could
be reduced by not only reduced market valuations but also by customer withdrawals and redemptions. Such withdrawals and
redemptions from equity funds and accounts might be partially offset by transfers to our fixed-income accounts and the transfer of funds
to us from our competitors’ customers.
Equity Assets
While we invest in equity assets with the expectation of achieving higher returns than would be available in our core fixed-income
investments, the returns on and values of these equity investments are subject to somewhat greater market risk than our fixed-income
investments. These investments, however, add diversification benefits to our fixed-income investments.
Derivatives Hedging Equity Market Risk
We enter into derivative transactions to hedge our exposure to equity market risk. Such derivatives include over-the-counter equity
options, total return swaps, variance swaps, and equity futures. See Note 6 for additional information on our derivatives used to hedge
our exposure to equity market fluctuations.
98
The following provides the sensitivity of price changes (in millions) to our equity assets owned and derivatives hedging equity market risk:
Equity Assets
Domestic equities
Foreign equities
Total equity securities
Hedge funds
Private equities
Other equity interests
Total equity assets
Derivatives Hedging Equity
Market Risk
Call options (2)
Equity futures
Put options
Total return swaps
Total derivatives hedging
equity market risk
Carrying /
Notional
Value
As of December 31, 2023
10% Fair
Value
Increase (1)
Estimated
Fair Value
10% Fair
Value
Decrease (1)
As of December 31, 2022
Carrying /
Notional
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
$
$
$
279 $
27
306
284
3,893
2
4,485 $
279 $
27
306
284
3,893
2
4,485 $
28 $
3
31
28
389
–
448 $
(28) $
(3)
(31)
(28)
(389)
–
(448) $
282 $
145
427
265
2,793
3
3,488 $
98,521 $
1,627
100,856
17,937
7,623 $
–
(938)
(667)
1,942 $
(49)
68
(899)
(1,978) $
49
(48)
908
40,821 $
983
47,206
25,247
282
145
427
265
2,793
3
3,488
4,330
–
(911)
(144)
$
218,941 $
6,018 $
1,062 $
(1,069) $
114,257 $
3,275
(1) Assumes a plus or minus 10% change in underlying indexes. Estimated fair value does not reflect daily settlement of futures or
monthly settlement of total return swaps.
(2) Includes notional of $2.7 billion and fair value of $94 million that support our modified coinsurance and funds withheld reinsurance
agreements. Investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers.
Liabilities
We have exposure to changes in our stock price through both our deferred and stock-based incentive compensation plans. For additional
information on our deferred and stock-based incentive compensations plans, see Notes 16 and 17, respectively.
Effect of Equity Market Sensitivity
If the level of the equity markets were to have instantaneously increased or decreased by 1% immediately after December 31, 2023, we
estimate the effect on income (loss) from operations for the next 12-month period from the change in asset-based fees and related
expenses would be approximately $12 million. For purposes of this estimate, we excluded any effect related to net flows, our annual
assumption review, persistency, hedge program performance, policyholder behavior or reduction in account balances attributable to
policyholder assessments.
The effect of quarterly equity market changes upon fee income and asset-based expenses is generally not fully recognized in the first
quarter of the change because fee income is earned and related expenses are incurred based upon daily variable account balances. The
difference between the current period average daily variable account balances compared to the end-of-period variable account balances
affects fee income in subsequent periods. Additionally, the effect on earnings may not necessarily be symmetrical with comparable
increases or decreases in the equity markets. This discussion concerning the estimated effects of ongoing equity market volatility on the
fees we earn from account balances is intended to be illustrative and is concentrated primarily in our Annuities and Retirement Plan
Services segments. Actual effects may vary depending on a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, such as changing
customer behaviors that might result in changes in the mix of our business between variable and fixed annuity contracts, switching among
investment alternatives available within variable products, changes in sales production levels or changes in policy persistency. For
purposes of this guidance, the change in account balances is assumed to correlate with the change in the relevant index.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk to earnings and capital that arises from uncertainty of an obligor’s or counterparty’s ability or willingness to meet its
obligations in accordance with contractually agreed upon terms. We are exposed to credit risk primarily by our investments in corporate
bonds and mortgage loans on real estate and through our use of derivatives.
99
Investments
The majority of our credit risk is concentrated in investment holdings. Our portfolio of investments was $124.3 billion and $131.7 billion
as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Of this total, $71.3 billion and $81.3 billion consisted of corporate bonds and
$19.0 billion and $18.3 billion consisted of mortgage loans on real estate as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We manage the
risk of adverse default experience on these investments by applying disciplined credit evaluation and underwriting standards, prudently
limiting allocations to lower-quality, higher-yielding investments and diversifying exposures by issuer, industry, region and property type.
For each counterparty or borrowing entity and its affiliates, our exposures from all transactions are aggregated and managed in relation to
formal limits set by rating quality. Additional diversification limits, such as limits per industry, are also applied. We remain exposed to
occasional adverse cyclical economic downturns during which default rates may be significantly higher than the long-term historical
average used in pricing.
Derivatives
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk through our various derivative contracts. We depend on the ability of derivative product
dealers and their guarantors to honor their obligations to pay the contract amounts under various derivatives agreements. In order to
minimize the risk of default losses, we diversify our exposures among several dealers and limit the amount of exposure to each in
accordance with the credit rating of each dealer or its guarantor. We generally limit our selection of counterparties that are obligated
under these derivative contracts to those with an “A” credit rating or above. See Note 6 for additional information on managing the
credit risk of our counterparties.
We are also exposed to credit risk through the use of certain derivatives. We buy CDSs to minimize our exposure to credit-related events
with respect to a single entity or referenced index. We also sell CDSs to offer credit protection to our contract holders and investors with
respect to a single entity or referenced index. See Note 6 for additional information on our use of credit derivatives.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Foreign Currency Denominated Investments
Foreign currency exchange risk is the risk of financial loss due to changes in the relative value between currencies. We have foreign
currency exchange risk in our non-U.S. dollar denominated investments, which primarily consist of fixed maturity securities. The
currency risk is hedged using foreign currency derivatives of the same currency as the foreign denominated security.
We invest in fixed maturity securities denominated in foreign currencies for incremental return and risk diversification relative to U.S.
dollar-denominated securities. We use foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to our investment in fixed
maturity securities denominated in foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, our unhedged positions consisted of $1
million and zero, respectively, of principal in U.S. dollar equivalents of foreign-denominated investments with maturity dates up to 2049
and an average interest rate of 3%. As of the same dates, our modified coinsurance portfolios were partially hedged and consisted of
$156 million and $164 million, respectively, of principal in U.S. dollar equivalents of foreign denominated investments with maturity dates
up to 2063 and an average interest rate of 6%. Investment results for our modified coinsurance agreements are passed directly to the
reinsurers. See “Interest Rate Risk – Significant Interest Rate Exposures” above for our notional amounts in U.S. dollar equivalents (in
millions) by year of maturity for our foreign currency swaps.
See Note 6 for additional information on our foreign currency swaps used to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
Market Risk Related to Certain Variable Annuity and Fixed Indexed Annuity Products
Our variable annuity and fixed indexed annuity contracts are exposed to market risks related to changes in the assumptions used in the
original pricing of these products, including equity market, interest rate, and non-market actuarial assumptions. For additional
information, see Note 10. We manage our exposure to market risks created by these fluctuations through a combination of product
design elements and our hedge program. In addition, we utilize reinsurance to mitigate risk. For additional information, see Note 8 and
“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Reinsurance.” Certain variable
annuity GLB and GDB riders are accounted for as MRBs and recorded at fair value. For more information on the market risk
sensitivities associated with MRBs, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
– Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Market Risk Benefits.”
100
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:
Note 1 – Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2 – New Accounting Standards
Note 3 – Adoption of ASU 2018-12
Note 4 – Investments
Note 5 – Variable Interest Entities
Note 6 – Derivative Instruments
Note 7 – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
Note 8 – Reinsurance
Note 9 – Goodwill and Specifically Identifiable Intangible Assets
Note 10 – MRBs
Note 11 – Separate Accounts
Note 12 – Policyholder Account Balances
Note 13 – Future Contract Benefits
Note 14 – Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Note 15 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 16 – Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans
Note 17 – Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans
Note 18 – Contingencies and Commitments
Note 19 – Shares and Stockholders’ Equity
Note 20 – Segment Information
Note 21 – Realized Gain (Loss)
Note 22 – Commissions and Other Expenses
Note 23 – Federal Income Taxes
Note 24 – Statutory Information and Restrictions
Note 25 – Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Data
Page
102
103
107
108
109
110
111
111
127
128
136
146
148
157
160
163
165
166
167
171
177
180
193
195
198
204
208
212
213
213
215
217
101
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Lincoln National
Corporation to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles. Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States of America generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, the end of our fiscal year. Management
based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Management’s assessment included evaluation of such elements as the
design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall control
environment.
Based on the assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the
fiscal year due to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles.
Remediation of Previously Reported Material Weakness
As previously reported, in the first quarter of 2023 management identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Specifically, management’s review control did not detect an error in the accounting related to the
recognition of realized gains on investments transferred in conjunction with a 2021 reinsurance transaction. The realized gains were
included in the deferred gain on reinsurance rather than recognized as realized gains in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income (Loss). As a result, realized gains on investments was understated and the deferred gain on reinsurance was overstated by $498
million, net of tax. In the first quarter of 2023, the Company restated its consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2022 and 2021 to reflect the correction of this error.
As of December 31, 2023, management has completed the remediation activities summarized below and has performed testing to evaluate
the design and operating effectiveness of the controls. As a result, we concluded that we had remediated the material weakness as of that
date.
Remediation Activities
Management took the following steps to remediate the material weakness:
1. We formed a technical review committee comprising cross-functional accounting, business, legal, and risk personnel that is in place
and operating with a dedicated charter in overseeing the technical accounting and reporting implications of complex significant
transactions;
2. We established protocols that are in place and operating, effectively enabling the involvement of external subject matter experts
providing support and insights to management from third party firms;
3. We formalized the documentation and review of key considerations and critical decision matters resulting from significant
reinsurance transactions by the aforementioned technical review committee; and
4. We communicated across the organization to reinforce the steps taken to strengthen the control environment related to significant
reinsurance transactions.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included on the following page.
102
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Lincoln National Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Lincoln National Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Lincoln National Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB),
the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of
comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and
the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 22, 2024 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company
in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 22, 2024
103
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Lincoln National Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lincoln National Corporation (the Company) as of December 31,
2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item
15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB),
the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our
report dated February 22, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of ASU No. 2018-12
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU No. 2018-12, Financial
Services – Insurance (Topic 944), Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts, with a transition date of January 1, 2021.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to
the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures
to which they relate.
104
Future Contract Benefits Liability
Description of the Matter At December 31, 2023, future contract benefits liabilities totaled $39.9 billion, a portion of
which related to universal life-type contracts with secondary guarantees.
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
The future contract benefits liability related to these product guarantees is based on estimates
of how much the Company will need to pay for future benefits and the amount of fees to be
collected from policyholders for these policy features. As described in Notes 1 (see section on
Future Contract Benefits), 3, and 13, to the consolidated financial statements, there is significant
uncertainty inherent in estimating this liability because there is a significant amount of
management judgment involved in developing certain assumptions that impact the liability
balance, which include mortality rates and policyholder lapse behavior.
Auditing the valuation of future contract benefits liabilities related to these products was
complex and required the involvement of our actuarial specialists due to the high degree of
judgment used by management in setting the assumptions used in the estimate of the future
contract benefits liability related to these products.
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of
controls over the future contract benefits liability estimation processes, including, among
others, controls related to the review and approval processes that management has in place for
the assumptions used in estimating the benefit ratio related to the future contract benefits
liability. This included testing controls related to management’s evaluation of the need to
update assumptions based on the comparison of actual Company experience to previous
assumptions.
We involved actuarial specialists to assist with our audit procedures which included, among
others, an evaluation of the methodology applied by management with those methods used in
prior periods. To assess the significant assumptions used by management, we compared the
significant assumptions noted above to historical experience and management’s estimates of
prospective changes in these assumptions. In addition, we performed an independent
recalculation of benefit ratio cash flows related to the future policy benefit reserves for a
sample of cohorts or contracts which we compared to the actuarial model used by
management.
Description of the Matter The Company’s market risk benefits (“MRBs”) assets and liabilities totaled $3.9 billion and
Market Risk Benefits
$1.7 billion, as of December 31, 2023, respectively, a portion of which relates to MRBs
associated with variable and fixed annuity contracts issued through separate accounts that may
include guaranteed living benefit and guaranteed death benefit features. As described in Notes
1 (see section on MRBs), 3, 10 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements, there is a
significant amount of estimation uncertainty inherent in measuring the fair value of the MRBs
because of the sensitivity of certain assumptions underlying the estimate, including equity
market return, volatility, policyholder lapse and benefit utilization. Management’s assumptions
are adjusted over time for emerging experience and expected changes in trends, resulting in
changes to the estimated fair value of the MRBs.
Auditing the valuation of the MRBs was complex and required the involvement of our
actuarial specialists due to the high degree of judgment used by management in setting the
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MRBs.
105
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of
controls over the MRBs estimation process, including, among others, controls related to the
review and approval processes that management has in place to develop the assumptions used
in measuring the fair value of the MRBs. This included testing controls related to
management’s evaluation of current and future capital market performance and the need to
update actuarial lapse and benefit utilization assumptions.
We involved actuarial specialists to assist with our audit procedures which included, among
others, an evaluation of the methodology applied by management with those methods used in
prior periods. To assess the significant assumptions used by management, we compared the
significant assumptions noted above to historical experience, observable market data or
management’s estimates of prospective changes in these assumptions. In addition, we
performed an independent recalculation of the MRBs for a sample of contracts which we
compared to the fair value model used by management.
Accounting for Reinsurance of Universal Life Insurance Products with Secondary
Guarantees, MoneyGuard® and Fixed Annuities Blocks of Business
Description of the Matter As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, in May 2023, the Company
entered into reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude
Re”) to cede in-force universal life insurance products with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”),
MoneyGuard® and fixed annuities blocks of business to Fortitude Re with an effective date of
October 1, 2023. A portion of the reinsurance agreements are accounted for using deposit
accounting representing a $12.0 billion deposit asset as of December 31, 2023, with the
remainder accounted for as reinsurance representing a $10.5 billion asset included in
reinsurance recoverables and a $2.7 billion deferred loss included in other assets as of
December 31, 2023. The Company recorded funds withheld reinsurance liabilities of $9.9
billion as of December 31, 2023 related to the retained portfolio of assets relating to the
MoneyGuard® policies.
Auditing the reinsurance agreements was complex due to the multiple elements of the
transaction, including the evaluation of deposit accounting versus reinsurance accounting for
each line of business and determination of the reinsurance recoverables, deferred loss, deposit
asset and funds withheld reinsurance liabilities.
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of
the controls over the accounting for the reinsurance agreements including, among others,
controls related to the application of deposit or reinsurance accounting, the determination of
the reinsurance recoverables, deferred loss, deposit asset and funds withheld reinsurance
liabilities.
We involved actuarial specialists to assist with our audit procedures which included, among
others, assessing and confirming the terms of the agreements with Fortitude Re, evaluating
management’s risk transfer conclusion, testing the fair value of the consideration transferred,
testing the calculation of the deferred loss, reconciling the funds withheld reinsurance liabilities
to the underlying investment portfolio and reconciling the deposit asset and reinsurance
recoverables to the recorded reserves based on the terms of the reinsurance agreements.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1966.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 22, 2024
106
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)
ASSETS
Investments:
Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, at fair value
(amortized cost: 2023 - $97,433; 2022 - $111,707; allowance for credit losses: 2023 - $19; 2022 - $22)
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate, net of allowance for credit losses
(portion at fair value: 2023 - $288; 2022 - $487)
Policy loans
Derivative investments
Other investments
Total investments
Cash and invested cash
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired and deferred sales inducements
Reinsurance recoverables, net of allowance for credit losses
Deposit assets, net of allowance for credit losses
Market risk benefit assets
Accrued investment income
Goodwill
Other assets
Separate account assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances
Future contract benefits
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities
Market risk benefit liabilities
Deferred front-end loads
Payables for collateral on investments
Short-term debt
Long-term debt
Other liabilities
Separate account liabilities
Total liabilities
Contingencies and Commitments (See Note 18)
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock – 10,000,000 shares authorized:
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
88,738 $
2,359
306
99,736
3,498
427
18,963
2,476
6,474
5,015
124,331
3,365
12,397
29,843
28,789
3,894
1,082
1,144
9,311
158,257
372,413 $
120,737 $
39,864
17,641
1,716
5,901
8,105
250
5,699
7,350
158,257
365,520
18,301
2,359
3,594
3,739
131,654
3,343
12,235
19,953
11,628
2,807
1,253
1,144
6,778
143,536
334,331
114,435
38,826
5,740
2,078
5,091
6,712
500
5,955
6,356
143,536
329,229
$
$
Series C preferred stock – 20,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023
Series D preferred stock – 20,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023
493
493
493
493
Common stock – 800,000,000 shares authorized; 169,666,137 and 169,220,511 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
4,605
4,778
(3,476)
6,893
372,413 $
4,544
5,924
(6,352)
5,102
334,331
$
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
107
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
Insurance premiums
Fee income
Net investment income
Realized gain (loss)
Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold through reinsurance
Other revenues
Total revenues
Expenses
Benefits
Interest credited
Market risk benefit (gain) loss
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Commissions and other expenses
Interest and debt expense
Spark program expense
Impairment of intangibles
Total expenses
Income (loss) before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized investment gain (loss)
Market risk benefit non-performance risk gain (loss)
Policyholder liability discount rate remeasurement gain (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Funded status of employee benefit plans
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic
Diluted
Cash Dividends Declared Per Preferred Share
Series C preferred stock
Series D preferred stock
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
3,672 $
5,467
5,879
(4,311)
38
900
11,645
6,138
3,248
(2,264)
(152)
5,339
331
153
–
12,793
(1,148)
(396)
(752)
3,715
(671)
(160)
8
(16)
2,876
2,124 $
6,087 $
5,603
5,515
840
42
723
18,810
8,479
2,877
(3,246)
2,766
5,125
283
167
634
17,085
1,725
367
1,358
(18,059)
(210)
2,012
(20)
(59)
(16,336)
(14,978) $
5,617
6,039
6,111
(867)
38
777
17,715
8,503
2,929
(3,753)
(183)
5,219
270
87
–
13,072
4,643
865
3,778
(3,287)
(923)
591
(2)
47
(3,574)
204
(4.92) $
(4.92)
7.93 $
7.78
20.17
19.96
1,792.19 $
2,306.25
– $
–
–
–
1.80 $
1.80 $
1.71
$
$
$
$
$
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
108
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in millions)
Preferred Stock
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Issuance of Series C preferred stock
Issuance of Series D preferred stock
Balance as of end-of-year
Common Stock
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Stock compensation/issued for benefit plans
Retirement of common stock/cancellation of shares
Balance as of end-of-year
Retained Earnings
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards
Net income (loss)
Retirement of common stock
Preferred stock dividends declared
Common stock dividends declared
Balance as of end-of-year
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Balance as of end-of-year
Total stockholders’ equity as of end-of-year
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
986 $
–
–
986
– $
493
493
986
–
–
–
–
4,544
61
–
4,605
5,924
–
(752)
–
(82)
(312)
4,778
4,735
40
(231)
4,544
5,196
–
1,358
(319)
–
(311)
5,924
(6,352)
–
2,876
(3,476)
6,893 $
9,984
–
(16,336)
(6,352)
5,102 $
$
5,082
85
(432)
4,735
8,686
(6,273)
3,778
(673)
–
(322)
5,196
8,931
4,627
(3,574)
9,984
19,915
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
109
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Realized (gain) loss
Market risk benefit (gain) loss
Sales and maturities (purchases) of trading securities, net
Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold through reinsurance
Impairment of intangibles
Net operating cash payments related to closing Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction
Change in:
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired, deferred sales inducements
and deferred front-end loads
Accrued investment income
Insurance liabilities and reinsurance-related balances
Accrued expenses
Federal income tax accruals
Other
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchases of available-for-sale securities and equity securities
Sales of available-for-sale securities and equity securities
Maturities of available-for-sale securities
Purchases of alternative investments
Sales and repayments of alternative investments
Issuance of mortgage loans on real estate
Repayment and maturities of mortgage loans on real estate
Repayment (issuance) of policy loans, net
Net change in collateral on investments, certain derivatives and related settlements
Other
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Payment of long-term debt, including current maturities
Issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs
Payment related to modification or early extinguishment of debt
Payment related to sale-leaseback transactions
Proceeds from certain financing arrangements
Payment related to certain financing arrangements
Net financing cash proceeds related to closing Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction
Deposits of fixed account balances
Withdrawals of fixed account balances
Transfers from (to) separate accounts, net
Common stock issued for benefit plans
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
Repurchase of common stock
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders
Dividends paid to common stockholders
Other
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash, invested cash and restricted cash
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of beginning-of-year
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of end-of-year
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
(752) $
1,358 $
3,778
4,311
(2,264)
1,301
(38)
–
(1,438)
637
4
(3,681)
109
(396)
133
(2,074)
(11,131)
4,013
5,670
(630)
111
(1,946)
1,268
(119)
(260)
(310)
(3,334)
(500)
–
–
(79)
86
(49)
1,246
16,404
(10,660)
(624)
(7)
–
–
(82)
(305)
–
5,430
22
3,343
3,365 $
(840)
(3,246)
300
(42)
634
–
488
(67)
4,419
(91)
421
275
3,609
(14,813)
2,297
5,453
(664)
446
(2,507)
2,255
5
(4,070)
(48)
(11,646)
(300)
296
–
(70)
186
–
–
16,203
(7,674)
19
(16)
986
(550)
–
(310)
(2)
8,768
731
2,612
3,343 $
867
(3,753)
(87)
(38)
–
–
475
16
(2,337)
399
864
(401)
(217)
(16,915)
2,268
9,621
(757)
377
(3,079)
1,881
62
3,261
(303)
(3,584)
–
–
(8)
(59)
159
–
–
13,426
(7,174)
(175)
20
–
(1,105)
–
(319)
(60)
4,705
904
1,708
2,612
$
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
110
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Lincoln National Corporation and its subsidiaries (“LNC” or the “Company,” which also may be referred to as “we,” “our” or “us”)
operate multiple insurance businesses through four business segments: Annuities, Life Insurance, Group Protection and Retirement Plan
Services. In addition, we include financial data for operations that are not directly related to our business segments in Other Operations.
The collective group of businesses uses “Lincoln Financial Group” as its marketing identity. Through our business segments, we sell a
wide range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement income products and solutions. These products
primarily include variable annuities, fixed annuities (including indexed), registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”), universal life insurance
(“UL”), variable universal life insurance (“VUL”), linked-benefit UL and VUL, indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”), term life
insurance, group life, disability and dental and employer-sponsored retirement plans and services. For more information on our segments
and the products and solutions we provide, see Note 20.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”). Certain GAAP policies, which significantly affect the determination of financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows, are summarized below.
Certain amounts reported in prior year’s Consolidated Balance Sheet have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in the
current year.
On January 1, 2023, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-12,
Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts and related amendments (“ASU 2018-12”) with a transition date
of January 1, 2021. ASU 2018-12 updated accounting and reporting requirements for long-duration contracts and certain investment
contracts issued by insurance entities. We adopted ASU 2018-12 under the modified retrospective approach, except for market risk
benefits (“MRBs”), which applied the full retrospective approach. Our consolidated financial statements are presented under the new
guidance for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2021.
We present disaggregated disclosures in the Notes below for long-duration insurance balances, applying the level of aggregation by
reportable segment as follows:
Reportable Segment
Level of Aggregation
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
Payout Annuities
Traditional Life
UL and Other
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
The variable annuities level of aggregation includes RILA products, which are indexed variable annuities. The fixed annuities level of
aggregation represents deferred fixed annuities. We have excluded amounts reported in Other Operations from our disaggregated
disclosures that are attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements with Protective Life Insurance Company (“Protective”) and
Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc (“Swiss Re”) as these contracts are fully reinsured, run-off institutional pension business in the form
of group annuity and the results of certain disability income business and not reflected in the results of the reportable segments listed
above.
Sale of Wealth Management Business
On December 14, 2023, we announced that we had entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Osaic Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Osaic”), pursuant to which Osaic agreed to acquire all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that
comprise the Company’s wealth management business, which include Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation and Lincoln Financial
Advisors Corporation. We anticipate the transaction will close in the first half of 2024, subject to receipt of required regulatory approvals
and satisfying other customary closing conditions.
111
As of December 31, 2023, we had assets of $131 million and liabilities of $60 million classified as held-for-sale and reported within other
assets and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The assets are reported primarily within Other Operations in
Note 20.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LNC and all other entities in which we have a controlling
financial interest and any variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which we are the primary beneficiary. We use the equity method of
accounting to recognize all of our investments in limited partnerships (“LPs”). All material inter-company accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Our involvement with VIEs is primarily to invest in assets that allow us to gain exposure to a broadly diversified portfolio of asset classes.
A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity to finance its own activities without additional financial support or where investors
lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. We assess our contractual, ownership or other interests in a VIE to
determine if our interest participates in the variability the VIE was designed to absorb and pass onto variable interest holders. We
perform an ongoing qualitative assessment of our variable interests in VIEs to determine whether we have a controlling financial interest
and would therefore be considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If we determine we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we
consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. In applying these estimates and assumptions, management
makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require assumptions about matters that are uncertain and inherently subject to
change. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. Included among the material (or potentially material) reported
amounts and disclosures that require use of estimates are: fair value of certain financial assets, derivatives, allowances for credit losses,
goodwill and other intangibles, MRBs, future contract benefits, income taxes including the recoverability of our deferred tax assets, and
the potential effects of resolving litigated matters.
Business Combinations
We use the acquisition method of accounting for all business combination transactions, and accordingly, recognize the fair values of
assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. The allocation of fair values
may be subject to adjustment after the initial allocation for up to a one-year period as more information becomes available relative to the
fair values as of the acquisition date. The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of any acquired company
since the acquisition date.
Fair Value Measurement
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include
inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or non-performance risk, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate
of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit
price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as
opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). Pursuant to the Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”), we categorize our financial instruments carried at fair value
into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for
fair value measurement is defined as follows:
•
•
•
Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the
reporting date, except for large holdings subject to “blockage discounts” that are excluded;
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly
observable as of the reporting date, and fair value can be determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies;
and
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs in situations where there is little or no market activity for the
asset or liability, and we make estimates and assumptions related to the pricing of the asset or liability, including assumptions
regarding risk.
112
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level
within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the
investment.
When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the determination is based upon
the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. Because certain securities trade in less liquid or illiquid
markets with limited or no pricing information, the determination of fair value for these securities is inherently more difficult. However,
Level 3 fair value investments may include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 inputs, observable components, which are
components that are actively quoted or can be validated to market-based sources.
Fixed Maturity Available-For-Sale Securities – Fair Valuation Methodologies and Associated Inputs
Securities classified as available-for-sale (“AFS”) consist of fixed maturity securities and are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses included within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”).
We measure the fair value of our securities classified as fixed maturity AFS based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing
the security. The most appropriate valuation methodology is selected based on the specific characteristics of the fixed maturity security,
and we consistently apply the valuation methodology to measure the security’s fair value. Our fair value measurement is based on a
market approach that utilizes prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable
securities. Sources of inputs to the market approach primarily include third-party pricing services, independent broker quotations or
pricing matrices. We do not adjust prices received from third parties; however, we do analyze the third-party pricing services’ valuation
methodologies and related inputs and perform additional evaluation to determine the appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy.
The observable and unobservable inputs to our valuation methodologies are based on a set of standard inputs that we generally use to
evaluate all of our fixed maturity AFS securities. Observable inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes,
issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators, industry and
economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. For certain security types, additional
inputs may be used, or some of the inputs described above may not be applicable. For private placement securities, we use pricing
matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement.
Depending on the type of security or the daily market activity, standard inputs may be prioritized differently or may not be available for all
fixed maturity AFS securities on any given day. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-
dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. For securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or
no pricing information, we use unobservable inputs to measure fair value.
The following summarizes our fair valuation methodologies and associated inputs, which are particular to the specified security type and
are in addition to the defined standard inputs to our valuation methodologies for all of our fixed maturity AFS securities discussed above:
•
Corporate bonds and U.S. government bonds – We also use Trade Reporting and Compliance EngineTM reported tables for our
corporate bonds and vendor trading platform data for our U.S. government bonds.
• Mortgage- and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) – We also utilize additional inputs, which include new issues data, monthly payment
information and monthly collateral performance, including prepayments, severity, delinquencies, step-down features and over
collateralization features for each of our mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), which include collateralized mortgage obligations and
mortgage pass through securities backed by residential mortgages (“RMBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and
collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”).
State and municipal bonds – We also use additional inputs that include information from the Municipal Securities Rule Making
Board, as well as material event notices, new issue data, issuer financial statements and Municipal Market Data benchmark yields for
our state and municipal bonds.
•
• Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities – We also utilize additional inputs of exchange prices (underlying and common stock of
the same issuer) for our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker-dealer quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons
with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security
classes. We have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by our third-party pricing service and the output
that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and
assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing service output to an alternative pricing source. We
also evaluate prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices
for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next.
113
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities (also referred to as “debt securities”) for declines in fair value that we determine to
be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit loss allowance.
For our debt securities, we generally consider the following to determine whether our debt securities with unrealized losses are credit
impaired:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The estimated range and average period until recovery;
The estimated range and average holding period to maturity;
Remaining payment terms of the security;
Current delinquencies and nonperforming assets of underlying collateral;
Expected future default rates;
Collateral value by vintage, geographic region, industry concentration or property type;
Subordination levels or other credit enhancements as of the balance sheet date as compared to origination; and
Contractual and regulatory cash obligations.
For a debt security, if we intend to sell a security, or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of
its amortized cost basis and the fair value of the debt security is below amortized cost, we conclude that an impairment has occurred and
the amortized cost is written down to current fair value, with a corresponding charge to realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For debt securities where impairment has been recognized, the difference between the new
amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected are accreted as interest income and recognized in net investment income
on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). If we do not intend to sell a debt security, or it is not more likely than
not we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis but the present value of the cash flows expected
to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the debt security (referred to as the credit loss), we conclude that an impairment has
occurred, and a credit loss allowance is recorded, with a corresponding charge to realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss). The remainder of the decline to fair value related to factors other than credit loss is recorded in other
comprehensive income (“OCI”) to unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities on the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’
Equity, as this amount is considered a noncredit impairment.
When assessing our intent to sell a debt security, or if it is more likely than not we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery
of its cost basis, we evaluate facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, decisions to reposition our security portfolio, sales of
securities to meet cash flow needs and sales of securities to capitalize on favorable pricing. Management considers the following as part of
the evaluation:
The current economic environment and market conditions;
•
• Our business strategy and current business plans;
•
• Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our
The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
•
hedging and overall risk management strategies;
The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments
and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of annuity contracts and life insurance policies;
The capital risk limits approved by management; and
•
• Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, we calculate the recovery value by performing a discounted cash
flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. The discount rate is the effective interest rate
implicit in the underlying debt security. The effective interest rate is the original yield, or the coupon if the debt security was previously
impaired. See the discussion below for additional information on the methodology and significant inputs, by security type, that we use to
determine the amount of a credit loss.
To determine the recovery period of a debt security, we consider the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including,
but not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
•
Historical and implied volatility of the security;
The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
114
In periods subsequent to the recognition of a credit loss impairment through a credit loss allowance, we continue to reassess the expected
cash flows of the debt security at each subsequent measurement date as necessary. If the measurement of credit loss changes, we
recognize a provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense through realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss), limited by the amount that amortized cost exceeds fair value. Losses are charged against the allowance
for credit losses when management believes the uncollectibility of a debt security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding
intent or requirement to sell is met. Accrued interest on debt securities is written-off through net investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) when deemed uncollectible.
To determine the recovery value of a corporate bond or CLO, we perform additional analysis related to the underlying issuer including,
but not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fundamentals of the issuer to determine what we would recover if they were to file bankruptcy versus the price at which the market
is trading;
Fundamentals of the industry in which the issuer operates;
Earnings multiples for the given industry or sector of an industry that the underlying issuer operates within, divided by the
outstanding debt to determine an expected recovery value of the security in the case of a liquidation;
Expected cash flows of the issuer (e.g., whether the issuer has cash flows in excess of what is required to fund its operations);
Expectations regarding defaults and recovery rates;
Changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; and
Additional market information (e.g., if there has been a replacement of the corporate debt security).
Each quarter, we review the cash flows for the MBS portfolio, including current credit enhancements and trends in the underlying
collateral performance to determine whether or not they are sufficient to provide for the recovery of our amortized cost. To determine
recovery value of a MBS, we perform additional analysis related to the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
• Discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover;
•
Level of borrower creditworthiness of the home equity loans or residential mortgages that back an RMBS or commercial mortgages
that back a CMBS;
Susceptibility to fair value fluctuations for changes in the interest rate environment;
Susceptibility to reinvestment risks, in cases where market yields are lower than the securities’ book yield earned;
Susceptibility to reinvestment risks, in cases where market yields are higher than the book yields earned on a security;
Expectations of sale of such a security where market yields are higher than the book yields earned on a security; and
Susceptibility to variability of prepayments.
•
•
•
•
•
When evaluating MBS and mortgage-related ABS, we consider a number of pool-specific factors as well as market level factors when
determining whether or not the impairment on the security requires a credit loss allowance. The most important factor is the
performance of the underlying collateral in the security and the trends of that performance in the prior periods. We use this information
about the collateral to forecast the timing and rate of mortgage loan defaults, including making projections for loans that are already
delinquent and for those loans that are currently performing but may become delinquent in the future. Other factors used in this analysis
include the credit characteristics of borrowers, geographic distribution of underlying loans and timing of liquidations by state. Once
default rates and timing assumptions are determined, we then make assumptions regarding the severity of a default if it were to occur.
Factors that impact the severity assumption include expectations for future home price appreciation or depreciation, loan size, first lien
versus second lien, existence of loan level private mortgage insurance, type of occupancy and geographic distribution of loans. Once
default and severity assumptions are determined for the security in question, cash flows for the underlying collateral are projected
including expected defaults and prepayments. These cash flows on the collateral are then translated to cash flows on our tranche based
on the cash flow waterfall of the entire capital security structure. If this analysis indicates the entire principal on a particular security will
not be returned, the security is reviewed for a credit loss by comparing the expected cash flows to amortized cost. To the extent that the
security has already been impaired through a credit loss allowance or was purchased at a discount, such that the amortized cost of the
security is less than or equal to the present value of cash flows expected to be collected, no credit loss allowance is required. Otherwise, if
the amortized cost of the security is greater than the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, and the security was not
purchased at a discount greater than the expected principal loss, then an impairment through a credit loss allowance is recognized.
We further monitor the cash flows of all of our debt securities backed by mortgages on an ongoing basis. We also perform detailed
analysis on all of our subprime, Alt-A, non-agency residential MBS and on a significant percentage of our debt securities backed by pools
of commercial mortgages. The detailed analysis includes revising projected cash flows by updating the cash flows for actual cash received
and applying assumptions with respect to expected defaults, foreclosures and recoveries in the future. These revised projected cash flows
are then compared to the amount of credit enhancement (subordination) in the structure to determine whether the amortized cost of the
security is recoverable. If it is not recoverable, we record an impairment through a credit loss allowance for the security.
115
Trading Securities
Trading securities consist of fixed maturity securities in designated portfolios, some of which support modified coinsurance and
coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance agreements. Investment results for the portfolios that support modified coinsurance and
coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance agreements, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers
pursuant to contractual terms of the reinsurance agreements. Trading securities are carried at fair value, and changes in fair value and
changes in the fair value of embedded derivative liabilities associated with the underlying reinsurance agreements are recorded in realized
gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) as they occur.
Equity Securities
Equity securities are carried at fair value, and changes in fair value are recorded in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) as they occur. Equity securities consist primarily of common stock of publicly-traded companies, privately
placed securities and mutual fund shares. We measure the fair value of our equity securities based on assumptions used by market
participants in pricing the security. The most appropriate valuation methodology is selected based on the specific characteristics of the
equity security. Fair values of publicly-traded equity securities are determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical or
comparable securities. When quoted prices are not available, we use valuation methodologies most appropriate for the specific asset. Fair
values for private placement securities are determined using discounted cash flow, earnings multiple and other valuation models. The fair
values of mutual fund shares that transact regularly are based on transaction prices of identical fund shares.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Mortgage loans on real estate consist of commercial and residential mortgage loans and are generally carried at unpaid principal balances
adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts and are net of allowance for credit losses. We carry certain mortgage
loans associated with modified coinsurance agreements at fair value where the fair value option has been elected. Interest income is
accrued on the principal balance of the loan based on the loan’s contractual interest rate. Premiums and discounts are amortized using
the effective yield method over the life of the loan. Interest income and amortization of premiums and discounts are reported in net
investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) along with mortgage loan fees, which are recorded
as they are incurred.
Our policy for commercial mortgage loans is to report loans that are 60 or more days past due, which equates to two or more payments
missed, as delinquent. Our policy for residential mortgage loans is to report loans that are 90 or more days past due, which equates to
three or more payments missed, as delinquent. We do not accrue interest on loans 90 days past due, and any interest received on these
loans is either applied to the principal or recorded in net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Loss) when received, depending on the assessment of the collectability of the loan. We resume accruing interest once a loan complies
with all of its original terms or restructured terms. Mortgage loans deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit
losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are likewise credited to the allowance for credit losses. Accrued interest on mortgage loans is
written-off when deemed uncollectible.
In connection with our recognition of an allowance for credit losses for mortgage loans on real estate, we perform a quantitative analysis
using a probability of default/loss given default/exposure at default approach to estimate expected credit losses in our mortgage loan
portfolio as well as unfunded commitments related to commercial mortgage loans, exclusive of certain mortgage loans held at fair value.
Our model estimates expected credit losses over the contractual terms of the loans, which are the periods over which we are exposed to
credit risk, adjusted for expected prepayments. Credit loss estimates are segmented by commercial mortgage loans, residential mortgage
loans, and unfunded commitments related to commercial mortgage loans.
The allowance for credit losses for pooled loans of similar risk (i.e., commercial and residential mortgage loans) is estimated using relevant
historical credit loss information adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions. Historical
credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses with adjustments for differences in current loan-
specific risk characteristics, such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term lengths as well as
adjustments for changes in environmental conditions, such as unemployment rates, property values, or other factors that management
deems relevant. We apply probability weights to the positive, base and adverse scenarios we use. For periods beyond our reasonable and
supportable forecast, we use implicit mean reversion over the remaining life of the recoverable, meaning our model will inherently revert
to the baseline scenario as the baseline is representative of the historical average over a longer period of time.
Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that, based upon current information and events, we will be unable to collect all
amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When we determine that a loan is impaired, a specific credit loss
allowance is established for the excess carrying value of the loan over its estimated value. The loan’s estimated value is based on: the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; the loan’s observable market price; or the fair
value of the loan’s collateral.
116
Allowance for credit losses are maintained at a level we believe is adequate to absorb current expected lifetime credit losses. Our periodic
evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is based on historical loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value
of the underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts about
the future and other relevant factors.
Mortgage loans on real estate are presented net of the allowance for credit losses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the
allowance are reported in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Mortgage loans on real
estate deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance for credit losses, limited to the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.
Our commercial loan portfolio is primarily comprised of long-term loans secured by existing commercial real estate. We believe all of the
commercial loans in our portfolio share three primary risks: borrower credit worthiness; sustainability of the cash flow of the property;
and market risk; therefore, our methods of monitoring and assessing credit risk are consistent for our entire portfolio.
For our commercial mortgage loan portfolio, trends in market vacancy and rental rates are incorporated into the analysis that we perform
for monitored loans and may contribute to the establishment of (or an increase or decrease in) an allowance for credit losses. In addition,
we review each loan individually in our commercial mortgage loan portfolio on an annual basis to identify emerging risks. We focus on
properties that experienced a reduction in debt-service coverage or that have significant exposure to tenants with deteriorating credit
profiles. Where warranted, we establish or increase a credit loss allowance for a specific loan based upon this analysis.
We measure and assess the credit quality of our commercial mortgage loans by using loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios. The
loan-to-value ratio compares the principal amount of the loan to the fair value at origination of the underlying property collateralizing the
loan and is commonly expressed as a percentage. Loan-to-value ratios greater than 100% indicate that the principal amount is greater
than the collateral value. Therefore, all else being equal, a lower loan-to-value ratio generally indicates a higher quality loan. The debt-
service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt-service payments. Debt-service coverage ratios of less than
1.0 indicate that property operations do not generate enough income to cover its current debt payments. Therefore, all else being equal, a
higher debt-service coverage ratio generally indicates a higher quality loan. These credit quality metrics are monitored and reviewed at
least annually.
We have off-balance sheet commitments related to commercial mortgage loans. As such, an allowance for credit losses is developed
based on the commercial mortgage loan process outlined above, along with an internally developed conversion factor.
Our residential loan portfolio is primarily comprised of first lien mortgages secured by existing residential real estate. In contrast to the
commercial mortgage loan portfolio, residential mortgage loans are primarily smaller-balance homogenous loans that share similar risk
characteristics. Therefore, these pools of loans are collectively evaluated for inherent credit losses. Such evaluations consider numerous
factors, including, but not limited to borrower credit scores, collateral values, loss forecasts, geographic location, delinquency rates and
economic trends. These evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available, including
updated forecasts, which can cause the allowance for credit losses to increase or decrease over time as such evaluations are revised.
Generally, residential mortgage loan pools exclude loans that are nonperforming, as those loans are evaluated individually using the
evaluation framework for specific allowance for credit losses described above.
For residential mortgage loans, our primary credit quality indicator is whether the loan is performing or nonperforming. We generally
define nonperforming residential mortgage loans as those that are 90 or more days past due and/or in nonaccrual status. There is
generally a higher risk of experiencing credit losses when a residential mortgage loan is nonperforming. We monitor and update aging
schedules and nonaccrual status on a monthly basis.
Policy Loans
Policy loans represent loans we issue to policyholders that use the cash surrender value of their life insurance policy as collateral. Policy
loans are carried at unpaid principal balances.
Derivative Instruments
We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity
risk and credit risk by entering into derivative transactions. Our derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at estimated fair value. We have master netting agreements with each of our derivative counterparties that
allow for the netting of our derivative asset and liability positions by counterparty. We categorize derivatives into a three-level hierarchy,
based on the priority of the inputs to the respective valuation technique as discussed above in “Fair Value Measurement.” The
accounting for changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as
part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and
117
qualify as hedging instruments, we designate the hedging instrument based upon the exposure being hedged: as a cash flow hedge or a fair
value hedge.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as
a component of AOCI and reclassified into net income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects net
income. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as
well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in net income during the period of
change in estimated fair values. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, but that are economic hedges, the gain
or loss is recognized in net income.
We purchase and issue financial instruments and products that contain embedded derivative instruments that are recorded with the
associated host contract. When it is determined that the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and
closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a
derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host for measurement purposes and reported within other assets or
other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The embedded derivative is carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized
in net income during the period of change.
We employ several different methods for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments. The fair value of our derivative
contracts are measured based on current settlement values, which are based on quoted market prices, industry standard models that are
commercially available and broker quotes. These techniques project cash flows of the derivatives using current and implied future market
conditions. We calculate the present value of the cash flows to measure the current fair market value of the derivative.
Other Investments
Other investments consist primarily of alternative investments, cash collateral receivables related to our derivative instruments, Federal
Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) common stock and short-term investments.
Alternative investments consist primarily of investments in LPs. We account for our investments in LPs using the equity method to
determine the carrying value. Recognition of alternative investment income is delayed due to the availability of the related financial
statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners. As a result, our private equity investments are generally
on a three-month delay and our hedge funds are on a one-month delay. In addition, the impact of audit adjustments related to
completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the second quarter of each calendar
year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar-year period may not include the complete impact
of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar-year period.
In uncleared derivative transactions, we and the counterparty enter into a credit support annex requiring either party to post collateral,
which may be in the form of cash, equal to the net derivative exposure. Cash collateral we have posted to a counterparty is recorded
within other investments. Cash collateral a counterparty has posted is recorded within payables for collateral on investments. We also
have investments in FHLB common stock, carried at cost, that enable access to the FHLB lending program. For more information on
our collateralized financing arrangements, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” below.
Short-term investments consist of securities with original maturities of one year or less, but greater than three months. Securities included
in short-term investments are carried at fair value, with valuation methods and inputs consistent with those applied to fixed maturity AFS
securities.
Cash and Invested Cash
Cash and invested cash is carried at cost and includes all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three
months or less.
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
Acquisition costs directly related to successful contract acquisitions or renewals of annuities, UL, VUL, traditional life insurance, group
life and disability insurance and other investment contracts have been deferred (i.e., DAC). Such acquisition costs are capitalized in the
period they are incurred and primarily include commissions, certain bonuses, a portion of total compensation and benefits of certain
employees involved in the acquisition process and medical and inspection fees. VOBA is an intangible asset that reflects the estimated
fair value of in-force contracts in a life insurance company acquisition and represents the portion of the purchase price that is allocated to
the value of the right to receive future cash flows from the business in force at the acquisition date. Bonus credits and excess interest for
dollar cost averaging contracts are considered DSI and reported in deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired and deferred
sales inducements on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contract sales charges that are collected in the early years of an insurance contract
are deferred and reported as deferred front-end loads on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
118
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization is reported within the following financial statement line items on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
• DAC and VOBA – commissions and other expenses
• DSI – interest credited
• DFEL – fee income
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL are amortized on a constant level basis relative to the insurance in force over the expected term of the
related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions that are consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder
liability balances. Actuarial assumptions include, but are not limited to, mortality, morbidity and certain policyholder behaviors such as
persistency, which are adjusted for emerging experience and expected trends of the related long-duration insurance contracts and certain
investment contracts by each reportable segment. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review and
update these actuarial assumptions. We may update our actuarial assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that
warrants updating outside of our comprehensive review. These resulting changes are applied prospectively.
The following provides a summary of our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization basis and expected amortization period by
reportable segment:
Reportable Segment
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Amortization Basis
Total deposits paid to date on policies in force
Policy count of policies in force
Group certificate contracts in force
Lives in force
Expected Amortization Period
Between 30 to 40 years
On average 60 years
4 years
Between 40 to 50 years
We account for modifications of insurance contracts that result in a substantially unchanged contract as a continuation of the replaced
contract. We account for modifications of insurance contracts that result in a substantially changed contract as an extinguishment of the
replaced contract.
For reinsurance transactions where we receive proceeds that represent recovery of our previously incurred acquisition costs, we reduce
the applicable unamortized acquisition cost such that net acquisition costs are capitalized and charged to commissions and other
expenses.
Reinsurance
Our insurance subsidiaries enter into reinsurance agreements in the normal course of business to limit our exposure to the risk of loss and
to enhance our capital management.
In order for a reinsurance agreement to qualify for reinsurance accounting, the agreement must satisfy certain risk transfer conditions that
include, among other items, a reasonable possibility of a significant loss for the assuming entity. When we apply reinsurance accounting,
insurance premiums, benefits and DAC and VOBA amortization are reported net of reinsurance ceded, as applicable, on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Amounts currently recoverable, such as ceded reserves, other than ceded
MRBs, are reported in reinsurance recoverables, and amounts currently payable to the reinsurers, such as premiums, are included in other
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In a modified coinsurance or coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance structured agreement, the investments that would have been
sent to the reinsurer as premiums are withheld by us and remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the existing accounting
maintained. A corresponding liability is recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets within funds withheld reinsurance liabilities
representing our obligation to pay the reinsurer. This liability includes embedded derivatives, which are total return swaps with
contractual returns that are attributable to various assets and liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. The changes in the
embedded derivative liabilities are reported within realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We use deposit accounting to recognize reinsurance agreements that do not transfer significant insurance risk. This accounting treatment
results in amounts paid or received by our insurance subsidiaries to be considered on deposit with the reinsurer and such amounts are
reported in deposit assets, net of allowance for credit losses and other liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As
amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted.
Reinsurance recoverables are measured and recognized consistent with the liabilities related to the underlying contracts. The interest
assumption used for discounting reinsurance recoverables associated with limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts and non-
participating traditional life insurance contracts is the upper-medium grade fixed income instrument (“single-A”) interest rate locked-in at
the reinsurance contract issuance date. We remeasure reinsurance recoverables associated with limited payment life-contingent annuity
119
contracts and non-participating traditional life insurance contracts with the current single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting
period. Ceded MRBs are accounted for separately from reinsurance recoverables. See “MRBs” below for additional information.
We estimated an allowance for credit losses for all reinsurance recoverables and related reinsurance deposit assets held by our subsidiaries,
other than ceded MRB assets. As such, we performed a quantitative analysis using a probability of loss model approach to estimate
expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables, inclusive of similar assets recognized using the deposit method of accounting. The
credit loss allowance is a general allowance for pools of receivables with similar risk characteristics segmented by credit risk ratings and
receivables assessed on an individual basis that do not share similar risk characteristics where we anticipate a credit loss over the life of
reinsurance-related assets, other than ceded MRB assets.
Our model uses relevant internal or external historical loss information adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable
forecasts of future events and conditions in developing our credit loss estimate. We utilized historical credit rating data to form an
estimation of probability of default of counterparties by means of a transition matrix that provides the rates of credit migration for credit
ratings transitioning to impairment. We updated reinsurer credit ratings during the period to incorporate the most up-to-date information
on the current state of the financial stability of our reinsurers. To simulate changes in economic conditions, we used positive, base and
adverse scenarios that include varying levels of loss given default assumptions to reflect the impact of changes in severity of losses. We
applied probability weights to the positive, base and adverse scenarios. For periods beyond our reasonable and supportable forecasts, we
used implicit mean reversion over the remaining life of the recoverable. Additionally, we considered factors that impact our exposure at
default that are driven by actuarial expectations around term assumptions rather than being directly driven by market or economic
environment.
Our model estimates the expected credit losses over the life of the reinsurance asset. Credit loss estimates are segmented based on
counterparty credit risk. Our modeling process utilizes counterparty credit ratings, collateral types and amounts, and term and run-off
assumptions. For reinsurance recoverables that do not share similar risk characteristics, we assessed on an individual basis to determine a
specific credit loss allowance.
We estimated expected credit losses over the contractual term of the recoverable, which is the period during which we are exposed to the
credit risk. Reinsurance recoverables may not have explicit contractual lives, but are tied to the underlying insurance products; as a result,
we estimated the contractual life by utilizing actuarial estimates of the timing of payouts related to those underlying products.
Reinsurance agreements often require the reinsurer to collateralize the recoverable with funds in a trust account or with a letter of credit
for the benefit of the ceding insurance entity that can reduce the expected credit losses on a given agreement. As such, we review
reinsurance collateral by individual agreement to sensitize risk of loss based on level of collateralization. This review is driven by the
assumption that non-collateralized reinsurance recoverables would have materially higher losses in times of default. Therefore,
reinsurance recoverables are pooled as either fully-collateralized or non-collateralized.
Reinsurance recoverables are presented net of the allowance for credit losses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the
allowance for credit losses are reported in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Reinsurance recoverables deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to the allowance for credit losses, limited to the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.
Where applicable, gains or losses recognized on reinsurance transactions are deferred and amortized into net income (loss) using an
amortization basis reflective of the characteristics of the underlying ceded business. Our deferred gains and losses on reinsurance of our
interest-sensitive life insurance products are recognized over the projected life of the policies, based on projected profitability or projected
reserve development for blocks with negative profitability. Our deferred gains and losses on reinsurance of our annuity products are
recognized over the period in which the majority of account balances is expected to run off. Deferred gains and losses are reported
within other liabilities and other assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Goodwill
We recognize the excess of the purchase price, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, over the fair value of
identifiable net assets acquired as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more
frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its
carrying value.
We perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying
value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired
and written down to the reporting unit’s fair value; and a charge is reported in impairment of intangibles on the Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The results of one goodwill impairment test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of
another reporting unit.
120
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other assets consist primarily of deferred loss on business sold through reinsurance, current and deferred taxes, certain reinsurance assets,
property and equipment, balances associated with corporate-owned and bank-owned life insurance, receivables resulting from sales of
securities that had not yet settled as of the balance sheet date, premiums and fees receivable, specifically identifiable intangible assets,
funds withheld reinsurance assets, operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, finance lease assets, ceded MRB liabilities and other
receivables and prepaid expenses. Other liabilities consist primarily of other policyholder liabilities, pension and other employee benefit
liabilities, certain financing arrangements, payables resulting from purchases of securities that had not yet settled as of the balance sheet
date, derivative instrument liabilities, ceded MRB assets, certain reinsurance payables, deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance,
long-term operating lease liabilities, finance lease liabilities and other accrued expenses.
The carrying values of specifically identifiable intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for indicators of impairment in value that are
related to credit loss or non-credit, including unexpected or adverse changes in the following: the economic or competitive environments
in which the company operates; profitability analyses; cash flow analyses; and the fair value of the relevant business operation. If there
was an indication of impairment, then the discounted cash flow method would be used to measure the impairment, and the carrying value
would be adjusted as necessary and reported in impairment of intangibles on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Loss). Sales force intangibles are attributable to the value of the new business distribution system acquired through business
combinations. These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of 25 years. Specifically identifiable intangible
assets also includes the value of customer relationships acquired (“VOCRA”) and value of distribution agreements (“VODA”). The
carrying values of VOCRA and VODA are amortized using a straight-line basis over their weighted average life of 20 years and 13 years,
respectively. See Note 9 for more information regarding specifically identifiable intangible assets.
Property and equipment owned for company use is carried at cost less allowances for depreciation. Provisions for depreciation of
investment real estate and property and equipment owned for company use are computed principally on the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which include buildings, computer hardware and software and other property and equipment. Certain
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to finance leases and certain financing arrangements and are depreciated in a
manner consistent with our current depreciation policy for owned assets. We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived
assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such
assets may not be fully recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, impairments are recognized when the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the
sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss is
measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value.
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by abandonment or in an exchange for a similar productive long-lived asset are classified as held-for-
use until they are disposed. Long-lived assets to be sold are classified as held-for-sale and are no longer depreciated. Certain criteria have
to be met in order for the long-lived asset to be classified as held-for-sale, including that a sale is probable and expected to occur within
one year. Long-lived assets classified as held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
We lease office space and certain equipment under various long-term lease agreements. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at
inception. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum
lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. Our leases do not provide an implicit rate; therefore, we use our
incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The ROU asset is calculated
using the lease liability carrying amount, plus or minus prepaid/accrued lease payments, minus the unamortized balance of lease incentives
received, plus unamortized initial direct costs. Lease terms used to calculate our lease obligation include options when we are reasonably
certain that we will exercise such options. Our lease agreements may contain both lease and non-lease components, which are accounted
for separately. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Separate Account Assets and Liabilities
Separate accounts represent segregated funds that are maintained to meet specific investment objectives of policyholders who direct the
investments and bear the investment risk, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain
accounts. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the
Company.
We report separate account assets as a summary total on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the fair value of the underlying
investments. The underlying investments consist primarily of mutual funds, fixed maturity AFS securities, short-term investments and
cash. Investment income and net realized and unrealized gains (losses) of the separate accounts generally accrue directly to the
policyholders; therefore, they are not reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), and the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows do not reflect investment activity of the separate accounts. Asset-based fees and contract administration
charges (collectively referred to as “policyholder assessments”) are assessed against the accounts and included within fee income on the
121
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). An amount equivalent to the separate account assets is recorded as separate
account liabilities, representing the account balance obligated to be returned to the policyholder.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date.
The liability for policyholder account balances includes UL and VUL and investment-type annuity products where account balances are
equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, policyholder assessments, as well as amounts representing the
fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our IUL and indexed annuity products. During the third quarter of each
year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating these embedded derivatives and
update assumptions as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is
indicative of the need for such an update.
Future Contract Benefits
Future contract benefits represent liability reserves, including liability for future policy benefits (“LFPB”), liability for future claims
reserves and additional liability for other insurance benefits that we have established and carry based on estimates of how much we will
need to pay for future benefits and claims.
The LFPB associated with limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts and non-participating traditional life insurance contracts is
measured using a net premium ratio approach. This approach accrues expected benefits and claims in proportion to the premium
revenue recognized. For life-contingent payout annuity contracts with limited premium payments, as premium collection is not the
completion of the earnings process, gross premiums in excess of net premiums are deferred. This excess of gross premiums received
over the related net premiums is referred to as the deferred profit liability (“DPL”). The DPL is included in the LFPB, and profits are
recognized over the life of the contracts.
In measuring our LFPB, we establish cohorts, which are groupings of long-duration contracts. Factors that we consider in determining
cohorts include, but are not limited to, our contract classification and issue year requirements, product risk characteristics, assumptions
and modeling level used in the valuation systems. The net premium ratio is capped at 100% at the individual cohort level. Expected
benefits and claims in excess of premium revenue recognized are expensed immediately.
We use actuarial assumptions to best estimate future premium and benefit cash flows (“cash flow assumptions”) as well as the actual
historical cash flows received and paid to derive a net premium ratio in measuring the LFPB. These actuarial assumptions include
mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals based principally on generally accepted actuarial
methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the cash flow assumptions
and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions (excluding the claims settlement expense
assumption that is locked in at inception) in the calculation of the net premium ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other
quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of such update. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the net
premium ratio for actual experience. The remeasurement of LFPB for both assumption updates and actual experience are reported
within policyholder liability remeasurement gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For all contract
cohorts issued after January 1, 2021, interest is accrued on LFPB at the single-A interest rate on the contract cohort inception date. For
contract cohorts issued prior to January 1, 2021, interest remains accruing at the original discount rate in effect on the contract cohort
inception date due to the modified retrospective transition method. We also remeasure the LFPB using the single-A interest rate as of the
end of each reporting period, which is reported within policyholder liability discount rate remeasurement gain (loss) on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We evaluate the liability for future claims on our long-term life and disability group products. Given the term and renewal features of our
product and funding nature of the associated premiums, we have determined that the liability value is generally zero for policies that are
not on claim. Therefore, the liability for future claims represents future payments on claims for which a disability event has occurred as
of the valuation date. In measuring the liability for future claims, we establish cohorts similar to the process described above and use
actuarial assumptions primarily based on claim termination rates, offsets for other insurance including social security and long-term
disability incidence and severity assumptions. Cash flow assumptions are subject to the comprehensive review process discussed above.
On a quarterly basis, the liability for future claims is updated for actual claims experience. The remeasurement of the liability for future
claims for both assumption updates and actual experience are reported within policyholder liability remeasurement gain (loss) on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). We remeasure the liability for future claims using a single-A interest rate as of
the end of each reporting period, which is reported within policyholder liability discount rate remeasurement gain (loss) on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We use the single-A interest rate curve to discount cash flows used to calculate the LFPB and the liability for future claims. This curve is
developed using the upper-medium grade (low credit risk) fixed-income instrument yields that are intended to reflect the duration
characteristics of the applicable insurance liabilities.
122
We issue UL contracts with separate accounts that may include various types of guaranteed benefits that are not accounted for as MRBs
or embedded derivatives. These guaranteed benefits require an additional liability that is calculated by estimating the present value of total
expected benefit payments over the life of the contract from inception divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the
life of the contract (“benefit ratio”) multiplied by the cumulative assessments recorded from the contract inception through the balance
sheet date less the cumulative payments plus interest on the liability. Cash flow assumptions incorporated in a benefit ratio in measuring
these additional liabilities for other insurance benefits include mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and
withdrawals based principally on generally accepted actuarial methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we
conduct our comprehensive review of the cash flow assumptions and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update
these assumptions in the calculation of the benefit ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of
information that is indicative of such update. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the benefit ratio for actual experience. The
remeasurement of additional liability for both assumptions and actual experience are reported within policyholder liability remeasurement
gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). As future cash flow assumption and experience updates
result in changes in expected benefit payments or assessments, the benefit ratio is recalculated using the updated expected benefit
payments and assessments over the life of the contract since inception. The revised benefit ratio is then applied to the liability calculation
described above.
Premium deficiency testing is performed for interest-sensitive life products periodically using best estimate assumptions as of the testing
date to test the adequacy and appropriateness of the established net reserve (i.e., GAAP reserves net of any DSI or VOBA assets). The
premium deficiency test is also performed using a discount rate based on the average crediting rate. A premium deficiency exists when
the net reserve plus the present value of expected future gross premiums are determined to be insufficient to cover expected future
benefits and non-level expenses.
The business written or assumed by us includes participating life insurance contracts, under which the policyholder is entitled to share in
the earnings of such contracts via receipt of dividends. The dividend scale for participating policies is reviewed annually and may be
adjusted to reflect recent experience and future expectations. As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, participating policies comprised
less than 1% of the face amount of business in force, and dividend expenses were $41 million, $49 million and $48 million for the years
ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
MRBs
MRBs are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and
expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or circumstance, such as death, annuitization
or periodic withdrawal. MRBs do not include the death benefit component of a life insurance contract (i.e., the difference between the
account balance and the death benefit amount). All long-duration insurance contracts and certain investment contracts are subject to
MRB evaluation. An MRB can be in either an asset or a liability position. Our MRB assets and MRB liabilities are reported at fair value
separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We issue variable and fixed annuity contracts that may include various types of guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) and guaranteed death
benefit (“GDB”) riders that we have classified as MRBs. For contracts that contain multiple features that qualify as MRBs, the MRBs are
valued on a combined basis using an integrated model. We have entered into reinsurance agreements to cede certain GLB and GDB
riders where the reinsurance agreements themselves are accounted for as MRBs or contain MRBs. We therefore record ceded MRB
assets and ceded MRB liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. Ceded MRB liabilities are included in other assets and
ceded MRB assets are included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our non-performance risk.
Ceded MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our counterparties’
non-performance risk. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market
participant and include assumptions for capital markets, policyholder behavior (e.g., policy lapse, rider utilization, etc.) mortality, risk
margin and administrative expenses. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical data and actuarial judgments. During
the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the actuarial assumptions and projection models used in
estimating these MRBs and update these assumptions on a prospective basis as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other
quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. The assumptions for our own non-
performance risk and our counterparties’ non-performance risk for MRBs and ceded MRBs, respectively, are determined at each valuation
date and reflect our and our counterparties’ risks of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the non-
performance risk is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. For information on fair value
inputs, see Note 15.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Short-term debt has contractual or expected maturities of one year or less. Long-term debt has contractual or expected maturities greater
than one year.
123
Payables for Collateral on Investments
When we enter into collateralized financing transactions on our investments, a liability is recorded equal to the cash or non-cash collateral
received. This liability is included within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Income and
expenses associated with these transactions are recorded as investment income and investment expenses within net investment income on
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Changes in payables for collateral on investments are reflected within
cash flows from investing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Contingencies and Commitments
A loss contingency is an existing condition, situation or set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible loss that will ultimately
be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Contingencies arising from environmental remediation costs,
regulatory judgments, claims, assessments, guarantees, litigation, recourse reserves, fines, penalties and other sources are recorded when
deemed probable and reasonably estimable, based on our best estimate.
Fee Income
Fee income for investment and interest-sensitive life insurance contracts consists of asset-based fees, percent of premium charges,
contract administration charges and surrender charges that are assessed against policyholder account balances. Investment products
consist primarily of individual and group variable and fixed annuities. Interest-sensitive life insurance products include UL, VUL, linked-
benefit UL and VUL and other interest-sensitive life insurance policies. These products include life insurance sold to individuals,
corporate-owned life insurance and bank-owned life insurance.
The timing of revenue recognition as it relates to fees assessed on investment contracts is determined based on the nature of such fees.
Asset-based fees and contract administration charges are assessed on a daily or monthly basis and recognized as revenue as performance
obligations are met, over the period underlying customer assets are owned or advisory services are provided. Percent of premium charges
are assessed at the time of premium payment and recognized as revenue when assessed and earned. Certain amounts assessed that
represent compensation for services to be provided in future periods are reported as unearned revenue and recognized in income over the
periods benefited. Surrender charges are recognized upon surrender of a contract by the policyholder in accordance with contractual
terms. For investment and interest-sensitive life insurance contracts, the amounts collected from policyholders are considered deposits
and are not included in revenue.
Wholesaling-related 12b-1 fees received from separate account fund sponsors as compensation for servicing the underlying mutual funds
are recorded as revenues based on a contractual percentage of the market value of mutual fund assets over the period shares are owned by
customers. Net investment advisory fees related to asset management of certain separate account funds are recorded as revenues based
on a contractual percentage of the customer’s managed assets over the period advisory services are provided. Fee income related to 12b-1
fees and net investment advisory fees, reported primarily within our Annuities segment, was $715 million, $743 million and $848 million
for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums consist primarily of group insurance products, payout annuities with life contingencies and traditional life insurance.
These insurance premiums are recognized as revenue when due.
Net Investment Income
We earn investment income on the underlying general account investments supporting our fixed products less related expenses.
Dividends and interest income, recorded in net investment income, are recognized when earned. Amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts on investments in debt securities are reflected in net investment income over the contractual terms of the
investments in a manner that produces a constant effective yield.
For CLOs and MBS, included in the trading and fixed maturity AFS securities portfolios, we recognize income using a constant effective
yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When actual prepayments differ significantly
from originally anticipated prepayments, the retrospective effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and a catch up
adjustment is recorded in the current period. In addition, the new effective yield, which reflects anticipated future payments, is used
prospectively. Any adjustments resulting from changes in effective yield are reflected in net investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
124
Realized Gain (Loss)
Realized gain (loss) includes realized gains and losses from the sale of investments, write-downs for impairments of investments and
changes in the allowance for credit losses for financial assets, changes in fair value of mortgage loans on real estate accounted for under
the fair value option, changes in fair value of equity securities, certain derivative and embedded derivative gains and losses, gains and
losses on the sale of subsidiaries and businesses and net gains and losses on reinsurance-related embedded derivatives and trading
securities. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined using the specific identification method. Realized gain
(loss) is reported net of allocations of investment gains and losses to certain policyholders, certain funds withheld on reinsurance
arrangements and certain modified coinsurance arrangements for which we have a contractual obligation to cede realized gains and losses
to the reinsurer.
MRB Gain (Loss)
MRB gain (loss) includes the change in fair value of MRB and ceded MRB assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of MRB assets
and liabilities are recognized in net income (loss), except for the portion attributable to the change in non-performance risk that is
recognized in OCI. Changes in the fair value of ceded MRB assets and liabilities, including the changes in our counterparties’ non-
performance risks, are recognized in net income (loss).
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist primarily of fees attributable to broker-dealer services recorded as performance obligations are met, either at the
time of sale or over time based on a contractual percentage of customer account balances, and proceeds from reinsurance recaptures.
The broker-dealer services primarily relate to our retail sales network and consist of commission revenue for the sale of non-affiliated
securities recorded on a trade date basis and advisory fee income. Advisory fee income is asset-based revenues recorded as earned based
on a contractual percentage of customer account balances. Other revenues attributable to broker-dealer services and advisory fee income,
reported primarily within our Annuities segment, were $564 million, $584 million and $628 million for the years ended December 31,
2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Other revenues earned by our Group Protection segment consist of fees from administrative services
performed, which are recognized as performance obligations are met over the terms of the underlying agreements, and were $210 million,
$203 million and $180 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Interest Credited
We credit interest to our policyholder account balances based on the contractual terms supporting our products.
Benefits
Benefits for UL and other interest-sensitive life insurance products include benefit claims incurred during the period in excess of contract
account balances. Benefits also include the change in reserves for annuity products with guaranteed death and living benefits, certain
annuities with life contingencies and life insurance products with secondary guarantee benefits. For traditional life, group life and
disability income products, benefits are recognized when incurred in a manner consistent with the related premium recognition policies.
Policyholder Liability Remeasurement Gain (Loss)
Policyholder liability remeasurement gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) includes remeasurement gains and losses resulting from
updates in cash flow assumptions and actual variance from expected experience used in the net premium ratio or benefit ratio calculation
for future policy benefits associated with limited payment life-contingent annuity products and traditional life insurance, liabilities for
future claims associated with our group products, and additional liabilities for other insurance benefits on certain guaranteed benefits
associated with our UL products.
Policyholder liability remeasurement gain (loss) recognized in OCI includes any changes resulting from the discount rate remeasurement
of future policy benefits associated with limited payment life-contingent annuity products and traditional life insurance and liabilities for
future claims associated with our group products as of each reporting period.
Spark Program Expense
Spark program expense consists primarily of costs related to our Spark Initiative.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Pursuant to the accounting rules for our obligations to employees and agents under our various pension and other postretirement benefit
plans, we are required to make a number of assumptions to estimate related liabilities and expenses. The mortality assumption is based on
125
actual and anticipated plan experience, determined using acceptable actuarial methods. We use assumptions for the weighted-average
discount rate and expected return on plan assets to estimate pension expense. The discount rate assumptions are determined using an
analysis of current market information and the projected benefit flows associated with these plans. The expected long-term rate of return
on plan assets is based on historical and projected future rates of return on the funds invested in the plan. The calculation of our
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation also uses an assumption of weighted-average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost
of covered benefits, which reflects a health care cost trend rate.
Stock-Based Compensation
In general, we expense the fair value of stock awards included in our incentive compensation plans. As of the date our stock awards are
approved, the fair value of stock options is determined using a Black-Scholes options valuation methodology, and the fair value of other
stock awards is based upon the market value of the stock. The fair value of the awards is expensed over the performance or service
period, which generally corresponds to the vesting period, and is recognized as an increase to common stock in stockholders’ equity. We
apply an estimated forfeiture rate to our accrual of compensation cost. We classify certain stock awards as liabilities. For these awards,
the settlement value is classified as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the liability is marked-to-market through net income
at the end of each reporting period. Stock-based compensation expense is reflected in commissions and other expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest expense on our short-term and long-term debt is recognized as due and any associated premiums, discounts and debt issuance
costs are amortized (accreted) over the term of the related borrowing utilizing the effective interest method. In addition, gains or losses
related to certain derivative instruments associated with debt are recognized in interest and debt expense during the period of the change.
Income Taxes
We file a U.S. consolidated income tax return that includes all of our eligible subsidiaries. Ineligible subsidiaries file separate individual
corporate tax returns. Subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S. are taxed, and income tax expense is recorded, based on applicable
foreign statutes. Deferred income taxes are recognized, based on enacted rates, when assets and liabilities have different values for
financial statement and tax reporting purposes. A valuation allowance is recorded to the extent required. Judgment and the use of
estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary and, if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In
evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and
liabilities; taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized;
and any tax planning strategies we would employ to avoid a tax benefit from expiring unused.
We use the individual security approach for releasing income tax effects from AOCI.
Foreign Currency Translation
The balance sheet accounts and income statement items of foreign subsidiaries, reported in functional currencies other than the U.S.
dollar are translated at the current and average exchange rates for the year, respectively. Resulting translation adjustments and other
translation adjustments for foreign currency transactions that affect cash flows are reported in AOCI, a component of stockholders’
equity.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the average common shares
outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed assuming the conversion or exercise of non-vested stock, stock options and performance share
units outstanding during the year. For any period where a net loss is experienced, shares used in the diluted EPS calculation represent
basic shares, as the use of diluted shares would result in a lower loss per share.
126
2. New Accounting Standards
The following table provides a description of our adoption of new Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) issued by the FASB and the
impact of the adoption on the consolidated financial statements. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not
applicable or insignificant in presentation or amount.
Standard
ASU 2020-04,
Reference Rate
Reform (Topic 848)
and related
amendments
ASU 2018-12,
Targeted
Improvements to
the Accounting for
Long-Duration
Contracts and
related amendments
Effect on Financial Statements or Other
Significant Matters
Description
Effective Date
March 12, 2020
through
December 31,
2024
This standard may be elected and applied
prospectively. We utilized certain practical
expedients under this guidance for contract
modifications and to maintain hedge
accounting for certain derivatives from the
effective date through December 31, 2023.
This ASU has not had a material impact to our
consolidated financial condition and results of
operations to date, and we do not expect
future material impacts through the close of
the ASU effective date on December 31, 2024.
The amendments in this update provide
optional guidance for a limited period of time to
ease the potential burden in accounting for (or
recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform
on financial reporting. The amendments provide
optional expedients and exceptions for applying
GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and
other transactions impacted by reference rate
reform. If certain criteria are met, an entity will
not be required to remeasure or reassess
contracts impacted by reference rate reform.
Additionally, changes to the critical terms of a
hedging relationship affected by reference rate
reform will not require entities to de-designate
the relationship if certain requirements are met.
The expedients and exceptions provided by the
amendments do not apply to contract
modifications made and hedging relationships
entered into or evaluated after December 31,
2024, with certain exceptions. The amendments
are effective for contract modifications made
between March 12, 2020, and December 31,
2024.
See Note 3 for information about ASU 2018-12. January 1, 2023 We adopted this ASU effective January 1,
2023, with a transition date of January 1, 2021,
using a modified retrospective approach,
except for MRBs for which we applied a full
retrospective transition approach. See Note 3
for transition disclosures related to the
adoption of this ASU.
127
3. Adoption of ASU 2018-12
On January 1, 2023, we adopted ASU 2018-12 with a transition date of January 1, 2021. ASU 2018-12 updated accounting and reporting
requirements for long-duration contracts and certain investment contracts issued by insurance entities. We adopted ASU 2018-12 under
the modified retrospective approach, except for MRBs, which applied the full retrospective approach. Our consolidated financial
statements are presented under the new guidance for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2021.
Under ASU 2018-12, we include actual historical cash flows along with best estimate future cash flows to derive the net premium ratio
when calculating the LFPB associated with our traditional and limited-payment long-duration contracts. We review and update, if
necessary, assumptions used to measure future cash flows included in the net premium ratio at least annually. Historical cash flows
included in the net premium ratio are updated for actual experience quarterly and as assumptions are updated. Changes in the
measurement of our LFPB result from updates to cash flow assumptions and actual experience, which impacts are reported within
policyholder remeasurement gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). We use an upper-medium
grade (low credit risk) fixed-income instrument yield (single-A) discount rate when calculating the LFPB. This discount rate is updated
quarterly at each reporting date with the impact recognized in OCI. ASU 2018-12 also eliminated loss recognition testing, premium
deficiency testing and the provision for adverse deviation for LFPB.
ASU 2018-12 introduced the category of MRBs, which are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from
other-than-nominal capital market risk and expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or
circumstance, such as death, annuitization or periodic withdrawal. MRBs are required to be measured at fair value, with periodic changes
in fair value reported within MRB gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), except for periodic
changes to instrument-specific credit risk related to direct policies, which are recognized in OCI. Changes in the fair value of ceded MRB
assets and liabilities are also reported within MRB gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
ASU 2018-12 simplified the amortization model for DAC and DAC-like intangible balances, including VOBA, DSI and DFEL.
Historically these balances were amortized in proportion to premium or over expected gross profits. They are now amortized on a
constant-level basis over the expected term of the contract. Loss recognition testing and impairment testing are no longer applicable for
DAC.
ASU 2018-12 requires disaggregated rollforwards of the beginning of year to the end of the reporting period balances. We also disclose
information about inputs, judgments, assumptions, methods, changes during the period and the effect of these changes on the
measurement of applicable balances. In determining the appropriate level of aggregation, we considered our reportable segments, nature
and risk characteristics of our products and level of aggregation we used in disclosures presented outside the financial statements.
The following table presents the cumulative effect adjustments (in millions), after-tax and shown as increase (decrease), to the
components of stockholders’ equity due to the adoption of ASU 2018-12 as of January 1, 2021, by primary accounting topic:
Shadow impacts:
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
Additional liabilities for other
insurance benefits
LFPB and other (1)
MRBs (2)
Total
Retained
Earnings
AOCI
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
$
$
– $
2,271 $
2,271
–
(187)
(6,086)
(6,273) $
1,197
(1,715)
2,874
4,627 $
1,197
(1,902)
(3,212)
(1,646)
(1) Includes impacts to reserves and ceded reserves reported within future contract benefits and reinsurance recoverables, respectively on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets, excluding shadow impacts on additional liabilities for other insurance benefits.
(2) Includes impacts related to MRB assets and MRB liabilities reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and ceded MRBs reported
within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
128
The following table summarizes the effect of the adoption of ASU 2018-12 as of January 1, 2021, (in millions) on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets:
DAC, VOBA and DSI
Reinsurance recoverables
Other assets (1)
Future contract benefits
MRBs, net
DFEL
Other liabilities (2)
Total
Retained
Earnings
AOCI
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
$
$
– $
607
242
(844)
(7,956)
–
1,678
(6,273) $
6,079 $
2,431
–
(3,088)
3,656
(3,190)
(1,261)
4,627 $
6,079
3,038
242
(3,932)
(4,300)
(3,190)
417
(1,646)
(1) Consists primarily of ceded MRB adjustments.
(2) Consists of state and federal tax adjustments.
The following table summarizes the changes in DAC, VOBA and DSI, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU 2018-12 and
reconciles this balance to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Balance Pre-
Adoption
December 31,
2020
Impact from
Removal of
Shadow
Balances from
AOCI
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
$
DAC
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
Traditional Life
UL and Other
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Total DAC
VOBA
Fixed Annuities
Traditional Life
UL and Other
Total VOBA
DSI (1)
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
UL and Other
Retirement Plan Services
Total DSI
Total DAC, VOBA and DSI
$
3,518 $
264
1,082
394
187
120
5,565
–
67
180
247
148
17
35
13
213
6,025 $
52 $
215
–
5,031
–
112
5,410
23
–
630
653
2
13
–
1
16
6,079 $
3,570
479
1,082
5,425
187
232
10,975
23
67
810
900
150
30
35
14
229
12,104
(1) Pre-adoption DSI balance was previously reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
129
The following table summarizes the changes in DFEL, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU 2018-12 and reconciles this
balance to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Balance Pre-
Adoption
December 31,
2020
Impact from
Removal of
Shadow
Balances from
AOCI
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
$
$
288 $
113
401 $
5 $
3,185
3,190 $
293
3,298
3,591
DFEL (1)
Variable Annuities
UL and Other
Total DFEL
(1) Pre-adoption DFEL balance was previously reported in other contract holder funds on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table summarizes the changes in future contract benefits, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU 2018-12 and
reconciles this balance to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Balance
Pre-Adoption
December 31,
2020 (1)
Impact from
Removal of
Shadow
Balances
from AOCI
Single-A
Discount
Rate
Measurement
in AOCI
Cumulative
Effect to
Retained
Earnings
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
LFPB
Payout Annuities
Traditional Life
Liability for Future Claims
Group Protection
Additional Liabilities for Other
Insurance Benefits
UL and Other
Other Operations (2)
Other (3)
Total future contract benefits
$
$
2,314 $
3,483
(105) $
–
415 $
943
44 $
–
5,422
–
517
–
13,649
10,463
3,565
38,896 $
(1,515)
(80)
–
(1,700) $
–
2,913
–
4,788 $
174
626
–
844 $
2,668
4,426
5,939
12,308
13,922
3,565
42,828
(1) Balance pre-adoption excludes features that meet the definition of an MRB upon transition, including features that were previously
accounted for as an additional liability. Also, balance pre-adoption reflects certain reclassifications of non-life contingent account
balances from future contract benefits to policyholder account balances within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Represents future contract benefits reported in Other Operations primarily attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements with
Protective ($6.3 billion and $7.4 billion as of December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2021, respectively) and Swiss Re ($2.0 billion and
$3.5 billion as of December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2021, respectively). Includes LFPB and additional liabilities balances.
(3) Represents other miscellaneous reserves outside the scope of ASU 2018-12.
130
The following table summarizes the changes in reinsurance recoverables, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU 2018-12 and
reconciles this balance to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Balance
Pre-Adoption
December 31,
2020 (1)
Single-A
Discount
Rate
Measurement
in AOCI
Cumulative
Effect to
Retained
Earnings
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
$
2 $
755
– $
151
– $
–
148
14
–
2
906
162
335
14,320
790
16,350 $
–
2,266
–
2,431 $
(3)
610
–
607 $
332
17,196
790
19,388
Reinsured LFPB
Payout Annuities
Traditional Life
Reinsured Liability for Future
Claims
Group Protection
Reinsured Additional Liabilities
for Other Insurance Benefits
UL and Other
Reinsured Other Operations (2)
Reinsured Other (3)
Total reinsurance recoverables
$
(1) Balance pre-adoption excludes features that meet the definition of a ceded MRB upon transition, including features that were
previously accounted for as reinsured additional liabilities.
(2) Represents reinsurance recoverables reported in Other Operations primarily attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements
with Protective ($12.0 billion and $13.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2021, respectively) and Swiss Re ($1.3 billion
and $2.6 billion as of December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2021, respectively). Includes reinsured LFPB and reinsured additional
liabilities balances.
(3) Represents other miscellaneous reinsurance recoverables outside the scope of ASU 2018-12.
The following table summarizes the changes in the net liability position of MRBs, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU
2018-12 and reconciles this balance to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
MRBs, Net
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
Retirement Plan Services
Total MRBs, net
Balance
Pre-Adoption
December 31,
2020 (1)
Cumulative
Effect of
Credit Risk
to AOCI
Cumulative
Effect to
Retained
Earnings
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
$
$
831 $
192
11
1,034 $
(3,592) $
(52)
(12)
(3,656) $
7,968 $
(22)
10
7,956 $
5,207
118
9
5,334
(1) Balance pre-adoption includes all features that meet the definition of an MRB upon transition, including features that were previously
accounted for as additional liabilities or embedded derivatives.
131
The following table summarizes the changes in the net asset position of ceded MRBs, pre-tax, (in millions) due to the adoption of ASU
2018-12, reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Ceded MRBs, Net
Variable Annuities
Total ceded MRBs, net
Balance
Pre-Adoption
December 31,
2020 (1)
Cumulative
Effect to
Retained
Earnings
Balance
Post-Adoption
January 1, 2021
$
$
215 $
215 $
121 $
121 $
336
336
(1) Balance pre-adoption includes all features that meet the definition of a ceded MRB upon transition, including features that were
previously accounted for as reinsured additional liabilities or embedded derivatives.
The following summarizes the effect of the adoption of ASU 2018-12 (in millions) on certain financial statement line items within the
previously reported Consolidated Balance Sheet:
As of December 31, 2022
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Previously
Reported (1)
As Adjusted
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business
acquired and deferred sales inducements (2)
Reinsurance recoverables, net of
allowance for credit losses (2)
Market risk benefit assets
Other assets (2)
Total assets (2)
Future contract benefits (2)
Market risk benefit liabilities
Deferred front-end loads (2)
Other liabilities (2)
Total liabilities (2)
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss)
Total stockholders’ equity
$
13,803 $
(1,568) $
12,235
20,392
–
8,469
335,222
41,756
–
5,708
6,311
330,653
6,707
(439)
2,807
(1,691)
(891)
(2,930)
2,078
(617)
45
(1,424)
(783)
19,953
2,807
6,778
334,331
38,826
2,078
5,091
6,356
329,229
5,924
(7,668)
4,569
1,316
533
(6,352)
5,102
(1) The amounts as previously reported were reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2022
(“2022 Form 10-K/A”).
(2) Certain as previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
132
The following summarizes the effect of the adoption of ASU 2018-12 (in millions, except per share data) on certain financial statement
line items within the previously reported Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Fee income
Realized gain (loss)
Total revenues
Benefits
Interest credited
Market risk benefit (gain) loss
Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain)
loss
Commissions and other expenses
Total expenses
Income (loss) before taxes
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
Unrealized investment gain (loss)
Market risk benefit non-performance risk
gain (loss)
Policyholder liability discount rate
remeasurement gain (loss)
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic
Diluted
As
Previously
Reported (1)
$
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
As
Previously
Reported (1)
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
6,054 $
345
18,766
12,546
2,870
–
–
5,096
21,596
(2,830)
(589)
(2,241)
(14,030)
(451) $
495
44
(4,067)
7
(3,246)
2,766
29
(4,511)
4,555
956
3,599
(4,029)
5,603 $
840
18,810
8,479
2,877
(3,246)
2,766
5,125
17,085
1,725
367
1,358
(18,059)
6,905 $
414
19,862
8,529
2,933
–
–
5,794
17,613
2,249
362
1,887
(2,535)
(866) $
(1,281)
(2,147)
(26)
(4)
(3,753)
(183)
(575)
(4,541)
2,394
503
1,891
(752)
6,039
(867)
17,715
8,503
2,929
(3,753)
(183)
5,219
13,072
4,643
865
3,778
(3,287)
–
–
(210)
(210)
2,012
2,012
–
–
(923)
(923)
591
591
(14,109)
(16,350)
(2,227)
1,372
(16,336)
(14,978)
(2,490)
(603)
(1,084)
807
(3,574)
204
(13.11)
(13.19)
21.04
20.97
7.93
7.78
10.07
9.98
10.10
9.98
20.17
19.96
(1) The amounts as previously reported were reported in our 2022 Form 10-K/A.
133
The following summarizes the effect of the adoption of ASU 2018-12 (in millions) on certain financial statement line items within the
previously reported Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
As
Previously
Reported (1)
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
As
Previously
Reported (1)
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
$
9,578 $
(4,382) $
5,196 $
8,686 $
– $
8,686
–
(2,241)
6,707
–
3,599
(783)
–
1,358
5,924
–
1,887
9,578
(6,273)
1,891
(4,382)
(6,273)
3,778
5,196
6,441
3,543
9,984
8,931
–
8,931
Retained earnings balance as of
beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new
accounting standards
Net income (loss)
Retained earnings balance as of end-of-year
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new
accounting standards
–
–
–
–
4,627
4,627
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) balance as of end-of-year
Total stockholders’ equity as of end-of-year
(14,109)
(2,227)
(16,336)
(2,490)
(1,084)
(3,574)
(7,668)
4,569
1,316
533
(6,352)
5,102
6,441
20,754
3,543
(839)
9,984
19,915
(1) The amounts as previously reported were reported in our 2022 Form 10-K/A.
134
The following summarizes the effect of the adoption of ASU 2018-12 (in millions) on certain financial statement line items within the
previously reported Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Realized (gain) loss
Market risk benefit (gain) loss
Change in:
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired, deferred sales inducements
and deferred front-end loads
Insurance liabilities and reinsurance-related balances (2)
Accrued expenses
Federal income tax accruals
Other (2)
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Realized (gain) loss
Market risk benefit (gain) loss
Change in:
Deferred acquisition costs, value of business acquired, deferred sales inducements
and deferred front-end loads
Insurance liabilities and reinsurance-related balances (2)
Accrued expenses
Federal income tax accruals
Other (2)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
As
Previously
Reported (1)
$
3,599 $
1,358
(2,241) $
(345)
–
(495)
(3,246)
(840)
(3,246)
118
5,630
(89)
(535)
246
370
(1,211)
(2)
956
29
488
4,419
(91)
421
275
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Adoption
of New
Accounting
Standard
As
Adjusted
As
Previously
Reported (1)
$
1,891 $
3,778
1,887 $
(414)
–
1,281
(3,753)
867
(3,753)
312
(2,233)
392
361
(413)
163
(104)
7
503
12
475
(2,337)
399
864
(401)
(1) The amounts as previously reported were reported in our 2022 Form 10-K/A.
(2) Certain as previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
135
4. Investments
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, allowance for credit losses and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities (in
millions) were as follows:
As of December 31, 2023
Amortized
Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
Fair Value
$
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
$
77,085 $
416
3,106
314
1,948
1,622
12,698
244
97,433 $
852 $
6
101
16
28
5
62
21
1,091 $
8,272 $
29
417
47
197
203
585
17
9,767 $
8 $
–
–
–
6
–
4
1
19 $
69,657
393
2,790
283
1,773
1,424
12,171
247
88,738
As of December 31, 2022
Amortized
Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
Fair Value
$
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
$
89,249 $
405
5,410
348
2,216
1,917
11,797
365
111,707 $
787 $
5
172
17
22
3
38
25
1,069 $
11,004 $
31
512
47
222
246
926
30
13,018 $
9 $
–
–
–
7
–
5
1
22 $
79,023
379
5,070
318
2,009
1,674
10,904
359
99,736
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity AFS securities by contractual maturities (in millions) as of December 31, 2023, were as
follows:
Due in one year or less
Due after one year through five years
Due after five years through ten years
Due after ten years
Subtotal
Structured securities (RMBS, CMBS, ABS)
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
$
$
4,295 $
17,171
15,113
44,586
81,165
16,268
97,433 $
4,257
16,563
13,956
38,594
73,370
15,368
88,738
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations.
136
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity AFS securities (dollars in millions) for which an allowance for credit losses has
not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position, were as follows:
Less Than or Equal
to Twelve Months
As of December 31, 2023
Greater Than Twelve
Months
Total
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses (1)
Fair Value
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
$
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
$
14,005 $
65
371
111
360
583
1,900
32
17,427 $
3,270 $
6
72
31
20
56
68
3
3,526 $
34,595 $
195
874
57
886
589
7,217
95
44,508 $
5,002 $
23
345
16
177
147
517
14
6,241 $
48,600 $
260
1,245
168
1,246
1,172
9,117
127
61,935 $
Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position
8,272
29
417
47
197
203
585
17
9,767
7,605
Less Than or Equal
to Twelve Months
As of December 31, 2022
Greater Than Twelve
Months
Total
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses (1)
Fair Value
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
$
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity AFS securities
$
59,929 $
261
1,958
130
1,490
1,224
6,715
63
71,770 $
9,049 $
25
440
19
179
156
552
5
10,425 $
7,094 $
27
237
58
193
320
3,326
97
11,352 $
1,955 $
6
72
28
43
90
374
25
2,593 $
67,023 $
288
2,195
188
1,683
1,544
10,041
160
83,122 $
Total number of fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position
11,004
31
512
47
222
246
926
30
13,018
8,175
(1) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized $8 million and $6 million of gross unrealized losses, respectively, in OCI for fixed
maturity AFS securities for which an allowance for credit losses has been recorded.
137
The fair value, gross unrealized losses (in millions) and number of fixed maturity AFS securities where the fair value had declined and
remained below amortized cost by greater than 20% were as follows:
Less than six months
Six months or greater, but less than nine months
Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months
Twelve months or greater
Total
$
$
2,492 $
343
336
4,094
7,265 $
927
96
109
2,922
4,054
As of December 31, 2023
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
As of December 31, 2022
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Number
of
Securities (1)
533
79
90
997
1,699
Number
of
Securities (1)
1,500
650
74
15
2,239
Less than six months
Six months or greater, but less than nine months
Nine months or greater, but less than twelve months
Twelve months or greater
Total
$
$
11,351 $
4,411
447
2
16,211 $
3,659
2,226
302
1
6,188
(1) We may reflect a security in more than one aging category based on various purchase dates.
Our gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities decreased by $3.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was
driven by declining interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2023 and the transfer of assets as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance
transaction. As discussed further below, we believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2023, did not require an impairment
recognized in earnings as (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be
required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value
compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. Based upon this evaluation as of December 31, 2023,
management believes we have the ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations (e.g., insurance premiums, fee
income and investment income) to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety without requiring the sale of our impaired
securities.
As of December 31, 2023, the unrealized losses associated with our corporate bond, U.S. government bond, state and municipal bond
and foreign government bond securities were attributable primarily to rising interest rates and widening credit spreads since purchase. We
performed a detailed analysis of the financial performance of the underlying issuers and determined that we expected to recover the entire
amortized cost of each impaired security.
Credit ratings express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities rated investment grade (those rated BBB- or higher by
S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”)) are generally considered by the rating agencies
and market participants to be low credit risk. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 96% of the fair value of our corporate bond portfolio
was rated investment grade. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the portion of our corporate bond portfolio rated below investment
grade had an amortized cost of $3.0 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, and a fair value of $2.8 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively.
Based upon the analysis discussed above, we believe that as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we would have recovered the amortized cost
of each corporate bond.
As of December 31, 2023, the unrealized losses associated with our MBS and ABS were attributable primarily to rising interest rates and
widening credit spreads since purchase. We assessed for credit impairment using a cash flow model that incorporates key assumptions
including default rates, severities and prepayment rates. We estimated losses for a security by forecasting the underlying loans in each
transaction. The forecasted loan performance was used to project cash flows to the various tranches in the structure, as applicable. Our
forecasted cash flows also considered, as applicable, independent industry analyst reports and forecasts and other independent market
data. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral
compared to our subordination or other credit enhancement, we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each impaired security.
As of December 31, 2023, the unrealized losses associated with our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities were attributable primarily
to wider credit spreads caused by illiquidity in the market and subordination within the capital structure, as well as credit risk of underlying
138
issuers. For our hybrid and redeemable preferred securities, we evaluated the financial performance of the underlying issuers based upon
credit performance and investment ratings and determined that we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each impaired
security.
Credit Loss Impairment on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including
those attributable to credit risk factors that may require an allowance for credit losses. See Note 1 for a discussion regarding our
accounting policy relating to the allowance for credit losses on our fixed maturity AFS securities.
Changes in the allowance for credit losses on fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions), aggregated by investment category, were as
follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Corporate
Bonds
RMBS
Other
Total
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions from purchases of PCD debt securities (1)
Additions for securities for which credit losses were not
previously recognized
Additions (reductions) for securities for which credit losses
were previously recognized
Reductions for securities disposed
Reductions for securities charged-off
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
$
$
9 $
–
25
(2)
(2)
(22)
8 $
7 $
–
1
(2)
–
–
6 $
6 $
–
–
(1)
–
–
5 $
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Corporate
Bonds
RMBS
Other
Total
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions from purchases of PCD debt securities (1)
Additions for securities for which credit losses were not
previously recognized
Additions (reductions) for securities for which credit losses
were previously recognized
Reductions for securities disposed
Reductions for securities charged-off
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
$
$
17 $
–
4
2
(2)
(12)
9 $
1 $
–
3
3
–
–
7 $
1 $
–
1
4
–
–
6 $
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Corporate
Bonds
RMBS
Other
Total
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions from purchases of PCD debt securities (1)
Additions for securities for which credit losses were not
previously recognized
Additions (reductions) for securities for which credit losses
were previously recognized
Reductions for securities disposed
Reductions for securities charged-off
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
$
$
12 $
–
8
5
(2)
(6)
17 $
1 $
–
–
–
–
–
1 $
– $
–
1
–
–
–
1 $
(1) Represents purchased credit-deteriorated (“PCD”) fixed maturity AFS securities.
(2) As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, accrued investment income on fixed maturity AFS securities totaled $908 million,
$1.1 billion and $972 million, respectively, and was excluded from the estimate of credit losses.
139
22
–
26
(5)
(2)
(22)
19
19
–
8
9
(2)
(12)
22
13
–
9
5
(2)
(6)
19
Trading Securities
Trading securities at fair value (in millions) consisted of the following:
Fixed maturity securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total trading securities
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
1,653 $
21
46
62
104
455
18
2,359 $
2,248
21
49
99
137
919
25
3,498
The portion of the market adjustment for trading gains and losses recognized in realized gain (loss) that relate to trading securities still
held as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was $81 million, $(632) million and $(51) million, respectively.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following provides the current and past due composition of our mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Commercial Residential
Total
Commercial Residential
Total
$
Current
30 to 59 days past due
60 to 89 days past due
90 or more days past due
Allowance for credit losses
Unamortized premium (discount)
Mark-to-market gains (losses) (1)
Total carrying value
$
17,256 $
61
–
–
(86)
(7)
(37)
17,187 $
1,665 $
28
9
60
(28)
43
(1)
1,776 $
18,921 $
89
9
60
(114)
36
(38)
18,963 $
17,003 $
19
–
–
(84)
(8)
(27)
16,903 $
1,315 $
23
6
33
(15)
36
–
1,398 $
18,318
42
6
33
(99)
28
(27)
18,301
(1) Represents the mark-to-market on certain mortgage loans on real estate for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 15
for additional information.
Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio had the largest concentrations in California, which accounted for 27% of commercial mortgage
loans on real estate as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and Texas, which accounted for 9% of commercial mortgage loans on real estate
as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
As of December 31, 2023, our residential mortgage loan portfolio had the largest concentrations in California and New York, which
accounted for 14% and 12% of residential mortgage loans on real estate, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, our residential mortgage
loan portfolio had the largest concentrations in California and New Jersey, which accounted for 17% and 12% of residential mortgage
loans on real estate, respectively.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had 116 and 73 residential mortgage loans, respectively, that were either delinquent or in
foreclosure. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had 82 and 49 residential mortgage loans in foreclosure, respectively, with an
aggregate carrying value of $38 million and $21 million, respectively.
We adopted ASU 2022-02, Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures as of January 1, 2023, and accordingly no longer
identify certain debt modifications as troubled debt restructurings. Losses from loan modifications for the year ended December 31, 2023,
were less than $1 million and reported in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
140
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were three and two specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans, respectively,
with an aggregate carrying value of $2 million and less than $1 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were 99 and 37 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans, respectively, with an
aggregate carrying value of $47 million and $16 million, respectively.
Additional information related to impaired mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Average aggregate carrying value for impaired mortgage loans on real estate
Interest income recognized on impaired mortgage loans on real estate
Interest income collected on impaired mortgage loans on real estate
$
30 $
–
–
16 $
–
–
32
–
–
The amortized cost of mortgage loans on real estate on nonaccrual status (in millions) was as follows:
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Nonaccrual
with no
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
Nonaccrual
with no
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
Nonaccrual
Commercial mortgage loans on real estate
Residential mortgage loans on real estate
Total
$
$
– $
–
– $
– $
62
62 $
Nonaccrual
– $
–
– $
–
34
34
We use loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios as credit quality indicators for our commercial mortgage loans on real estate. The
amortized cost of commercial mortgage loans on real estate (dollars in millions) by year of origination and credit quality indicator was as
follows:
Less than
65%
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
As of December 31, 2023
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
Greater than
75%
65% to 75%
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
Total
Origination Year
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018 and prior
Total
$
$
1,368
1,710
2,335
1,214
2,446
7,789
16,862
1.90 $
2.06
3.34
3.24
2.40
2.39
$
54
140
61
11
80
78
424
1.38 $
1.54
1.55
1.38
1.56
1.60
$
–
–
–
–
10
14
24
– $
–
–
–
2.33
0.87
$
1,422
1,850
2,396
1,225
2,536
7,881
17,310
141
Less than
65%
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
As of December 31, 2022
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
Greater than
75%
65% to 75%
Debt-Service
Coverage
Ratio
Total
Origination Year
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017 and prior
Total
$
$
1,769
2,354
1,289
2,685
2,225
6,184
16,506
2.06 $
3.05
3.00
2.18
2.17
2.44
$
105
72
17
81
71
131
477
1.50 $
1.53
1.58
1.50
1.62
1.75
$
2
–
–
29
–
–
31
1.45 $
–
–
1.58
–
–
$
1,876
2,426
1,306
2,795
2,296
6,315
17,014
We use loan performance status as the primary credit quality indicator for our residential mortgage loans on real estate. The amortized
cost of residential mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) by year of origination and credit quality indicator was as follows:
Origination Year
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018 and prior
Total
Origination Year
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017 and prior
Total
Performing
As of December 31, 2023
Nonperforming
Total
515 $
533
465
78
99
53
1,743 $
2 $
22
18
3
13
4
62 $
Performing
As of December 31, 2022
Nonperforming
Total
578 $
527
90
119
65
–
1,379 $
5 $
6
3
18
2
–
34 $
$
$
$
$
517
555
483
81
112
57
1,805
583
533
93
137
67
–
1,413
Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
In connection with our recognition of an allowance for credit losses for mortgage loans on real estate, we perform a quantitative analysis
using a probability of default/loss given default/exposure at default approach to estimate expected credit losses in our mortgage loan
portfolio as well as unfunded commitments related to commercial mortgage loans, exclusive of certain mortgage loans held at fair value.
See Note 1 for a discussion regarding our accounting policy relating to the allowance for credit losses on our mortgage loans on real
estate.
142
Changes in the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions) were as follows:
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions (reductions) from provision for credit loss expense (1)
Additions from purchases of PCD mortgage loans on real estate
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions (reductions) from provision for credit loss expense (1)
Additions from purchases of PCD mortgage loans on real estate
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Additions (reductions) from provision for credit loss expense (1)
Additions from purchases of PCD mortgage loans on real estate
Balance as of end-of-year (2)
$
$
$
$
$
$
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Residential
Total
Commercial
84 $
2
–
86 $
15 $
13
–
28 $
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Residential
Total
Commercial
79 $
5
–
84 $
17 $
(2)
–
15 $
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Residential
Total
Commercial
187 $
(108)
–
79 $
17 $
–
–
17 $
99
15
–
114
96
3
–
99
204
(108)
–
96
(1) We recognized $(1) million of credit loss benefit (expense) related to unfunded commitments for mortgage loans on real estate for the
year ended December 31, 2023. We did not recognize any credit loss benefit (expense) related to unfunded commitments for
mortgage loans on real estate for the year ended December 31, 2022. We recognized $4 million of credit loss benefit (expense)
related to unfunded commitments for mortgage loans on real estate for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(2) Accrued investment income on mortgage loans on real estate totaled $68 million, $51 million and $49 million as of December 31,
2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and was excluded from the estimate of credit losses.
Alternative Investments
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, alternative investments included investments in 352 and 337 different partnerships, respectively, and
represented approximately 3% and 2% of total investments, respectively.
143
Net Investment Income
The major categories of net investment income (in millions) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as
follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Policy loans
Cash and invested cash
Commercial mortgage loan prepayment
and bond make-whole premiums
Alternative investments
Consent fees
Other investments
Investment income
Investment expense
Net investment income
$
$
4,819 $
161
13
755
103
129
10
243
3
(33)
6,203
(324)
5,879 $
4,469 $
182
11
689
101
13
105
66
8
79
5,723
(208)
5,515 $
4,351
167
3
680
115
–
199
679
10
64
6,268
(157)
6,111
Impairments on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
Details underlying intent to sell impairments and credit loss benefit (expense) incurred that were recognized in net income (loss) and
included in realized gain (loss) on fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Intent to Sell Impairments (1)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total intent to sell impairments
Credit Loss Benefit (Expense)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
RMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total credit loss benefit (expense)
$
$
$
$
(941) $
(48)
(28)
(36)
(37)
(1)
(1,091) $
(24) $
1
1
–
(22) $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
(5) $
(6)
(4)
–
(15) $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(10)
–
–
(1)
(11)
(1) Represents impairments of certain fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, resulting from the Company’s intent
to sell these securities as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. Pursuant to the applicable accounting guidance, the
Company impaired the securities in a loss position down to fair market value upon entry into the agreements in the second quarter of
2023 and recognized additional impairment on certain of these securities during the third quarter of 2023 due to higher interest rates.
Interest rates declined during the fourth quarter of 2023, which resulted in recognition of a $335 million pre-tax net gain upon close
of the transaction, included in gross gains and gross losses on fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 21. See Note 8 for additional
information.
144
Payables for Collateral on Investments
The carrying value of the payables for collateral on investments included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the fair value of the
related investments or collateral (in millions) consisted of the following:
Collateral payable for derivative investments (1)
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements (2)
Investments pledged for FHLBI (3)
Total payables for collateral on investments
As of December 31, 2023
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
As of December 31, 2022
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
$
$
5,250 $
205
2,650
8,105 $
5,250 $
197
3,603
9,050 $
3,284 $
298
3,130
6,712 $
3,284
287
3,925
7,496
(1) We obtain collateral based upon contractual provisions with our counterparties. These agreements take into consideration the
counterparties’ credit rating as compared to ours, the fair value of the derivative investments and specified thresholds that if exceeded
result in the receipt of cash that is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. This also includes
interest payable on collateral. See Note 6 for additional information.
(2) Our pledged securities under securities lending agreements are included in fixed maturity AFS securities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. We generally obtain collateral in an amount equal to 102% and 105% of the fair value of the domestic and foreign securities,
respectively. We value collateral daily and obtain additional collateral when deemed appropriate. The cash received in our securities
lending program is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.
(3) Our pledged investments for FHLBI are included in fixed maturity AFS securities and mortgage loans on real estate on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The collateral requirements are generally 105% to 115% of the fair value for fixed maturity AFS
securities and 155% to 175% of the fair value for mortgage loans on real estate. The cash received in these transactions is primarily
invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities.
We have repurchase agreements through which we can obtain liquidity by pledging securities. The collateral requirements are generally
80% to 95% of the fair value of the securities, and our agreements with third parties contain contractual provisions to allow for additional
collateral to be obtained when necessary. The cash received in our repurchase program is typically invested in fixed maturity AFS
securities. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we were not participating in any open repurchase agreements.
Increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments (in millions) consisted of the following:
Collateral payable for derivative investments
Securities pledged under securities lending agreements
Investments pledged for FHLBI
$
Total increase (decrease) in payables for collateral on investments
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
1,966 $
(93)
(480)
1,393 $
(2,291) $
57
–
(2,234) $
2,599
125
–
2,724
We have elected not to offset our securities lending transactions in the consolidated financial statements. The remaining contractual
maturities of securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings (in millions) were as follows:
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds
Equity securities
Total gross secured borrowings
As of December 31, 2023
Overnight
and
Continuous
Up to 30
Days
30-90 Days
Greater than
90 Days
Total
$
$
202 $
3
205 $
– $
–
– $
– $
–
– $
– $
–
– $
202
3
205
145
Securities Lending
Corporate bonds
Foreign government bonds
Equity securities
Total gross secured borrowings
Overnight
and
Continuous
$
$
288 $
2
8
298 $
As of December 31, 2022
Up to 30
Days
30-90 Days
Greater than
90 Days
Total
– $
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
– $
288
2
8
298
We accept collateral in the form of securities in connection with repurchase agreements. In instances where we are permitted to sell or re-
pledge the securities received, we report the fair value of the collateral received and a related obligation to return the collateral in the
consolidated financial statements. In addition, we receive securities in connection with securities borrowing agreements that we are
permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of all collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge
was $25 million, and we had not re-pledged any of this collateral to cover our collateral requirements.
We also accept collateral from derivative counterparties in the form of securities which we are permitted to sell or re-pledge. As of
December 31, 2023, the fair value of this collateral received that we are permitted to sell or re-pledge was $1.3 billion, and we had
repledged $553 million of this collateral to cover our collateral requirements.
We have also pledged fixed maturity AFS securities to derivative counterparties with a fair value of $42 million as of December 31, 2023.
Investment Commitments
As of December 31, 2023, our investment commitments were $3.1 billion, which included $2.4 billion of LPs, $536 million of mortgage
loans on real estate and $203 million of private placement securities.
Concentrations of Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, our most significant investments in one issuer were our investments in securities issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association with a fair value of $739 million and $745 million, respectively, or 1% of total investments, and
our investments in securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation with a fair value of $570 million and $720 million,
respectively, or 1% of total investments. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, our most significant investments in one industry were our investments in securities in the financial
services industry with a fair value of $14.0 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, or 11% and 13%, respectively, of total investments, and
our investments in securities in the consumer non-cyclical industry with a fair value of $13.8 billion and $15.1 billion, respectively, or 11%
of total investments. These concentrations include fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities.
5. Variable Interest Entities
Consolidated VIEs
Reinsurance-Related Notes
We are the sole equity owner of Lincoln Financial Limited Liability Company I (“LFLLCI”), which we formed in July 2013. The activities
of LFLLCI relate solely to our captive reinsurance subsidiary, the Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont V (“LRCVV”), and are
primarily to acquire, hold and issue notes with LRCVV as well as pay and collect interest on the notes. LFLLCI holds a surplus note
issued by LRCVV that had an outstanding principal balance of $544 million as of December 31, 2023. LFLLCI issued a long-term note
to LRCVV that has a principal balance that moves concurrently with any variability in the face amount of the surplus note LFLLCI
received from LRCVV. We concluded that LFLLCI is a VIE and that LNC is the primary beneficiary as we have the power to direct the
most significant activities affecting the performance of LFLLCI.
146
Asset information (dollars in millions) for the consolidated VIEs included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was as follows:
As of December 31, 2023
Notional
Amounts
Number of
Instruments
Carrying
Value
As of December 31, 2022
Notional
Amounts
Number of
Instruments
Carrying
Value
Assets
Total return swap
1 $
544 $
–
1 $
568 $
–
There were no gains or losses for consolidated VIEs recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for
the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Unconsolidated VIEs
Reinsurance-Related Notes
Effective September 30, 2014, we entered into a transaction with a non-affiliated VIE whose primary activities are to acquire, hold and
issue notes and loans, pay and collect interest on the notes and loans, and enter into derivative instruments. We issued a long-term senior
note to the non-affiliated VIE in exchange for a corporate bond AFS security of like principal and duration that was assigned to one of
our subsidiaries. The outstanding principal balance of this long-term senior note was $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2023, and it is
variable in nature; moving concurrently with any variability in the face amount of the corporate bond AFS security up to a maximum
amount of $1.1 billion. We have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary of the non-affiliated VIE because we do not have
power over the activities that most significantly affect its economic performance. In addition, the terms of the senior note provide us
with a set-off right with the corporate bond AFS security we purchased from the VIE; therefore, neither appears on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The VIE has entered into a total return swap with an unaffiliated third party that supports any necessary principal
funding of the corporate bond AFS security required by our subsidiaries while the security is outstanding.
Effective October 1, 2017, our captive reinsurance subsidiary, the Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont VI, restructured the
$275 million, long-term surplus note which was originally issued to a non-affiliated VIE in October 2015 in exchange for two corporate
bond AFS securities of like principal and duration. The activities of the VIE are primarily to acquire, hold and issue notes and loans and
to pay and collect interest on the notes and loans. The outstanding principal balance of the long-term surplus note is variable in nature;
moving concurrently with any variability in the face amount of the corporate bond AFS securities. We have concluded that we are not
the primary beneficiary of the non-affiliated VIE because we do not have power over the activities that most significantly affect its
economic performance. As of December 31, 2023, the principal balance of the long-term surplus note was zero and we do not currently
have any exposure to this VIE.
Effective November 1, 2019, we entered into a transaction with a non-affiliated VIE whose primary activities are to acquire, hold and
issue notes, as well as pay and collect interest on the notes. We issued a long-term senior note to the non-affiliated VIE in exchange for a
corporate bond AFS security of like principal and duration that was assigned to one of our subsidiaries. The outstanding principal
balance of this long-term senior note was $398 million as of December 31, 2023, and it is variable in nature, moving concurrently with any
variability in the face amount of the corporate bond AFS security up to a maximum amount of $500 million. We have concluded that we
are not the primary beneficiary of the non-affiliated VIE due to our lack of power over the activities that most significantly affect its
economic performance as well as the extent of our obligation to absorb its losses. In addition, the terms of the senior note provide us
with a set-off right with the corporate bond AFS security we purchased from the VIE; therefore, neither appears on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Effective September 30, 2021, we entered into a transaction with a non-affiliated VIE whose primary activities are to acquire, hold and
issue notes, as well as pay and collect interest on the notes. We issued a long-term senior note to the non-affiliated VIE in exchange for a
corporate bond AFS security of like principal and duration that was assigned to one of our subsidiaries. The outstanding principal
balance of this long-term senior note was $400 million as of December 31, 2023, and it is variable in nature, moving concurrently with any
variability in the face amount of the corporate bond AFS security up to a maximum amount of $400 million. We have concluded that we
are not the primary beneficiary of the non-affiliated VIE due to our lack of power over the activities that most significantly affect its
economic performance as well as the extent of our obligation to absorb its losses. In addition, the terms of the senior note provide us
with a set-off right with the corporate bond AFS security we purchased from the VIE; therefore, neither appears on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
147
Effective December 31, 2022, we entered into a transaction with a non-affiliated VIE whose primary activities are to acquire, hold and
issue notes, as well as pay and collect interest on the notes. We issued a long-term note to the non-affiliated VIE in exchange for a
corporate bond AFS security of like principal and duration that was assigned to one of our subsidiaries. The outstanding principal
balance of this long-term note was $1.25 billion as of December 31, 2023, and it is variable in nature, moving concurrently with any
variability in the face amount of the corporate bond AFS security up to a maximum amount of $1.25 billion. We have concluded that we
are not the primary beneficiary of the non-affiliated VIE due to our lack of power over the activities that most significantly affect its
economic performance as well as the extent of our obligation to absorb its losses. In addition, the terms of the note provide us with a
set-off right with the corporate bond AFS security we received from the VIE; therefore, neither appears on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Structured Securities
Through our investment activities, we make passive investments in structured securities issued by VIEs for which we are not the manager.
These structured securities include our ABS, RMBS and CMBS. We have not provided financial or other support with respect to these
VIEs other than our original investment. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs due to the relative
size of our investment in comparison to the principal amount of the structured securities issued by the VIEs and the level of credit
subordination that reduces our obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits. Our maximum exposure to loss on these
structured securities is limited to the amortized cost for these investments. We recognize our variable interest in these VIEs at fair value
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For information about these structured securities, see Note 4.
Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
We invest in certain LPs and limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that we have concluded are VIEs. Our exposure to loss is limited to
the capital we invest in the LPs and LLCs. We do not hold any substantive kick-out or participation rights in the LPs and LLCs, and we
do not receive any performance fees or decision maker fees from the LPs and LLCs. Based on our analysis of the LPs and LLCs, we are
not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs as we do not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the LPs and LLCs. The
carrying amounts of our investments in the LPs and LLCs are recognized in other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
were $4.2 billion and $3.1 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
6. Derivative Instruments
We maintain an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned
fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity risk
and credit risk. We assess these risks by continually identifying and monitoring changes in our exposures that may adversely affect
expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
Derivative activities are monitored by various management committees. The committees are responsible for overseeing the
implementation of various hedging strategies that are developed through the analysis of financial simulation models and other internal and
industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are incorporated into our overall risk management strategies.
See Note 1 for a discussion of the accounting treatment for derivative instruments. See Note 15 for additional disclosures related to the
fair value of our derivative instruments and Note 5 for derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIEs.
Interest Rate Contracts
We use derivative instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless
otherwise noted and include:
Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps
We use forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure within our annuity and life insurance products.
Interest Rate Cap Corridors
We use interest rate cap corridors to provide a level of protection from the effect of rising interest rates for certain annuity contracts and
life insurance products. Interest rate cap corridors involve purchasing an interest rate cap at a specific cap rate and selling an interest rate
cap with a higher cap rate. For each corridor, the amount of quarterly payments, if any, is determined by the rate at which the underlying
index rate resets above the original capped rate. The corridor limits the benefit the purchaser can receive as the related interest rate index
rises above the higher capped rate. There is no additional liability to us other than the purchase price associated with the interest rate cap
corridor.
148
Interest Rate Futures
We use interest rate futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures
contracts require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.
We also use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate risk of floating-rate
bond coupon payments by replicating a fixed-rate bond.
Finally, we use interest rate swap agreements designated and qualifying as fair value hedges to hedge against changes in the fair value of
certain fixed-rate long-term debt and fixed maturity securities due to interest rate risks.
Treasury and Reverse Treasury Locks
We use treasury locks designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate exposure related to our issuance of fixed-
rate securities or the anticipated future cash flows of floating-rate fixed maturity securities due to changes in interest rates. In addition, we
use reverse treasury locks designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge the interest rate exposure related to the anticipated
purchase of fixed-rate securities or the anticipated future cash flows of floating-rate fixed maturity securities due to changes in interest
rates. These derivatives are primarily structured to hedge interest rate risk inherent in the assumptions used to price certain liabilities.
Foreign Currency Contracts
We use derivative instruments as part of our foreign currency risk management strategy. These instruments are economic hedges unless
otherwise noted and include:
Currency Futures
We use currency futures to hedge foreign exchange risk associated with certain options in variable annuity products. Currency futures
exchange one currency for another at a specified date in the future at a specified exchange rate.
Foreign Currency Swaps
We use foreign currency swaps to hedge foreign exchange risk of investments in fixed maturity securities denominated in foreign
currencies. A foreign currency swap is a contractual agreement to exchange one currency for another at specified dates in the future at a
specified exchange rate.
We also use foreign currency swaps designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge foreign exchange risk of investments in fixed
maturity securities denominated in foreign currencies.
Foreign Currency Forwards
We use foreign currency forwards to hedge foreign exchange risk of investments in fixed maturity securities denominated in foreign
currencies. A foreign currency forward is a contractual agreement to exchange one currency for another at specified dates in the future at
a specified current exchange rate.
Equity Market Contracts
We use derivative instruments as part of our equity market risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:
Call Options Based on the S&P 500® Index and Other Indices
We use call options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity, RILA, fixed indexed annuity, IUL and VUL
products.
Our RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component,
where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500 Index or other indices. Policyholders may elect to
rebalance index options at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-
price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We
149
use call options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged
with respect to equity returns for the current reset period.
Consumer Price Index Swaps
We use consumer price index swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in fixed annuity products. Consumer price index
swaps are contracts entered into at no cost and whose payoff is the difference between the consumer price index inflation rate and the
fixed-rate determined as of inception.
Equity Futures
We use equity futures contracts to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products. These futures contracts
require payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the futures index price.
Put Options
We use put options to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity, RILA and VUL products. Put options are
contracts that require the buyers to pay at a specified future date the amount, if any, by which a specified equity index is less than the
strike rate stated in the agreement, applied to a notional amount.
Total Return Swaps
We use total return swaps to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity, RILA and VUL products.
In addition, we use total return swaps to hedge a portion of the liability related to our deferred compensation plans. We receive the total
return on a portfolio of indexes and pay a floating-rate of interest.
Commodity Contracts
We use commodity contracts to economically hedge certain investments that are closely tied to the changes in commodity values. The
commodity contract is an over-the-counter contract that combines a purchase put/sold call to lock in a commodity price within a
predetermined range in exchange for a net premium.
Credit Contracts
We use derivative instruments as part of our credit risk management strategy that are economic hedges and include:
Credit Default Swaps – Buying Protection
We use credit default swaps (“CDSs”) to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.
We buy CDSs to hedge against a drop in bond prices due to credit concerns of certain bond issuers. A CDS allows us to put the bond
back to the counterparty at par upon a default event by the bond issuer. A default event is defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay,
obligation acceleration or restructuring.
CDSs – Selling Protection
We use CDSs to hedge the liability exposure on certain options in variable annuity products.
We sell CDSs to offer credit protection to policyholders and investors. The CDSs hedge the policyholders and investors against a drop in
bond prices due to credit concerns of certain bond issuers. A CDS allows the investor to put the bond back to us at par upon a default
event by the bond issuer. A default event is defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay, obligation acceleration or restructuring.
150
Embedded Derivatives
We have embedded derivatives that include:
RILA, Fixed Indexed Annuity and IUL Contracts Embedded Derivatives
Our RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect an interest rate return or an equity market component,
where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. Policyholders may elect to
rebalance index options at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-
price the indexed component by establishing participation rates, caps, spreads and specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We
use options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged with
respect to equity returns for the current reset period.
Reinsurance-Related Embedded Derivatives
We have certain modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance agreements with embedded derivatives related to
the withheld assets of the related funds. These derivatives are considered total return swaps with contractual returns that are attributable
to various assets and liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements.
Derivatives Related to Divestitures and Reinsurance Transactions
We used interest rate futures contracts to hedge the interest rate risk related to the assets used as consideration in the Fortitude Re
reinsurance transaction. These futures contracts required payment between our counterparty and us on a daily basis for changes in the
associated future index prices.
We use swaptions and forward-starting swaps to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into
with Osaic.
151
We have derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks whose notional or contract amounts exceed the related credit exposure.
Outstanding derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks (in millions) were as follows:
As of December 31, 2023
Fair Value
Notional
Amounts
As of December 31, 2022
Fair Value
Notional
Amounts
Asset
Liability
Asset
Liability
Qualifying Hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)
Foreign currency contracts (1)
Total cash flow hedges
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)
Foreign currency contracts (1)
Total fair value hedges
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts (1)
Foreign currency contracts (1)
Equity market contracts (1)
Commodity contracts (1)
Credit contracts (1)
Embedded derivatives:
Reinsurance-related (2)
RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts (3)
$
1,698 $
4,662
6,360
181 $
423
604
47 $
78
125
2,590 $
4,383
6,973
123 $
643
766
1,081
25
1,106
90,829
306
225,626
–
91
–
–
1
–
1
636
11
10,244
–
–
39
1
40
979
6
4,227
–
–
1,155
–
1,155
105,977
395
142,946
13
–
2
–
2
709
27
5,135
14
–
–
940
12,436 $
552
9,077
15,006 $ 257,459 $
–
–
416
525
7,594 $
232
18
250
44
–
44
935
2
2,035
3
–
–
4,783
8,052
Total derivative instruments
$ 324,318 $
(1) These asset and liability balances are presented on a gross basis. Amounts are reported in derivative investments and other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets after the evaluation for right of offset subject to master netting agreements as described in Note
1.
(2) Reported in funds withheld reinsurance liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3) Reported in policyholder account balances and deposit accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments (in millions) was as follows:
Interest rate contracts (1)
Foreign currency contracts (2)
Equity market contracts
Credit contracts
Total derivative instruments
with notional amounts
Remaining Life as of December 31, 2023
Less Than
1 Year
1 – 5
Years
6 - 10
Years
11 - 30
Years
Over 30
Years
$
22,166 $
276
174,805
–
25,350 $
956
37,200
91
22,349 $
1,687
6,950
–
22,530 $
2,032
9
–
1,213 $
42
6,662
–
Total
93,608
4,993
225,626
91
$
197,247 $
63,597 $
30,986 $
24,571 $
7,917 $
324,318
(1) As of December 31, 2023, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for
these instruments was April 20, 2067.
(2) As of December 31, 2023, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for
these instruments was June 16, 2061.
152
The following amounts (in millions) were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair
value hedges:
Amortized Cost of the
Hedged Assets /
(Liabilities)
Cumulative Fair Value
Hedging Adjustment
Included in the Amortized
Cost of the Hedged Assets /
(Liabilities)
As of
December 31,
2023
As of
December 31,
2022
As of
December 31,
2023
As of
December 31,
2022
$
534 $
(703)
587 $
(698)
39 $
172
44
177
Line Item in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in
which the Hedged Item is Included
Fixed maturity AFS securities, at fair value
Long-term debt (1)
(1) Includes $(326) million and $(341) million of unamortized adjustments from discontinued hedges as of December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively.
The change in our unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments within AOCI (in millions) was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period:
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment
Income tax benefit (expense)
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses)
included in net income (loss):
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts (1)
Interest rate contracts (2)
Foreign currency contracts (1)
Foreign currency contracts (3)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
$
388 $
–
(85) $
–
(402)
25
293
(50)
(169)
(15)
196
182
312
(144)
(1)
31
54
7
(19)
375 $
2
(11)
62
39
(19)
388 $
$
116
130
152
(85)
3
(23)
48
(2)
(5)
(85)
(1) The OCI offset is reported within net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(2) The OCI offset is reported within interest and debt expense on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(3) The OCI offset is reported within realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
153
The effects of qualifying and non-qualifying hedges (in millions) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were
as follows:
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Net Investment
Income
Realized Gain
(Loss)
Interest and
Debt Expense
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value or Cash
Flow Hedges are Recorded
Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Foreign currency contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Equity market contracts
Commodity contracts
Credit contracts
Embedded derivatives:
Reinsurance-related
RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value or Cash
Flow Hedges are Recorded
Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Foreign currency contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Equity market contracts
Commodity contracts
Credit contracts
Embedded derivatives:
Reinsurance-related
RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts
$
(4,311) $
5,879 $
331
–
–
–
7
(161)
(2)
1,387
8
(4)
(968)
(3,187)
(5)
5
(1)
54
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(5)
5
31
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Net Investment
Income
Realized Gain
(Loss)
Interest and
Debt Expense
$
840 $
5,515 $
283
–
–
–
39
(2,113)
3
(2,075)
11
(4)
622
1,760
(167)
167
2
62
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
156
(156)
(11)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
154
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Net Investment
Income
Realized Gain
(Loss)
Interest and
Debt Expense
Total Line Items in which the Effects of Fair Value or Cash
Flow Hedges are Recorded
Qualifying Hedges
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Hedged items
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:
Interest rate contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Foreign currency contracts:
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Interest rate contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Equity market contracts
Credit contracts
Embedded derivatives:
Reinsurance-related
RILA, fixed indexed annuity and IUL contracts
$
(867) $
6,111 $
270
–
–
–
(2)
(957)
(1)
3,354
(1)
185
(2,622)
(60)
60
3
48
–
–
–
–
–
–
46
(46)
(23)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
As of December 31, 2023, $91 million of the deferred net gains (losses) on derivative instruments in AOCI were expected to be
reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would be due primarily to interest rate variances related to our
interest rate swap agreements.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were no material reclassifications to earnings due to hedged firm commitments
no longer deemed probable or due to hedged forecasted transactions that had not occurred by the end of the originally specified time
period.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we did not have any exposure related to CDSs for which we are the seller.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparties on various derivative contracts and reflect
assumptions regarding the credit or non-performance risk. The non-performance risk is based upon assumptions for each counterparty’s
credit spread over the estimated weighted average life of the counterparty exposure, less collateral held. As of December 31, 2023, the
non-performance risk adjustment was zero. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by entering into agreements
with financial institutions with long-standing, superior performance records. Additionally, we maintain a policy of requiring derivative
contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement. We are required to
maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, our insurance
subsidiaries have agreed to maintain certain financial strength or claims-paying ratings. A downgrade below these levels could result in
termination of derivative contracts, at which time any amounts payable by us would be dependent on the market value of the underlying
derivative contracts. In certain transactions, we and the counterparty have entered into a credit support annex requiring either party to
post collateral when net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. The
amount of such exposure is essentially the net replacement cost or market value less collateral held for such agreements with each
counterparty if the net market value is in our favor. We did not have any exposure as of December 31, 2023 or 2022.
155
The amounts recognized (in millions) by S&P credit rating of counterparty, for which we had the right to reclaim cash collateral or were
obligated to return cash collateral, were as follows:
S&P
Credit
Rating of
Counterparty
AA-
A+
A
A-
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Collateral
Posted by
Counter-
Party
(Held by
LNC)
Collateral
Posted by
LNC
(Held by
Counter-
Party)
Collateral
Posted by
Counter-
Party
(Held by
LNC)
Collateral
Posted by
LNC
(Held by
Counter-
Party)
$
$
2,378 $
2,496
82
273
5,229 $
(63) $
(125)
–
–
(188) $
383 $
1,718
1,172
–
3,273 $
(6)
(166)
–
–
(172)
Balance Sheet Offsetting
Information related to the effects of offsetting on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions) was as follows:
Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets
Gross amounts offset
Net amount of assets
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral
Non-cash collateral (1)
Net amount
Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities
Gross amounts offset
Net amount of liabilities
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral
Non-cash collateral (2)
Net amount
As of December 31, 2023
Embedded
Derivative
Instruments
Derivative
Instruments
Total
$
$
$
$
10,927 $
(4,453)
6,474
(5,229)
(1,245)
– $
967 $
(612)
355
(188)
(167)
– $
940 $
–
940
–
–
940 $
9,629 $
–
9,629
–
–
9,629 $
11,867
(4,453)
7,414
(5,229)
(1,245)
940
10,596
(612)
9,984
(188)
(167)
9,629
(1) Excludes excess non-cash collateral received of $1.3 billion, as the collateral offset is limited to the net estimated fair value of
derivatives after application of netting arrangements.
(2) Excludes excess non-cash collateral pledged of $82 million, as the collateral offset is limited to the net estimated fair value of
derivatives after application of netting arrangements.
͏
156
Financial Assets
Gross amount of recognized assets
Gross amounts offset
Net amount of assets
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral
Non-cash collateral (1)
Net amount
Financial Liabilities
Gross amount of recognized liabilities
Gross amounts offset
Net amount of liabilities
Gross amounts not offset:
Cash collateral
Non-cash collateral (2)
Net amount
As of December 31, 2022
Embedded
Derivative
Instruments
Derivative
Instruments
Total
$
$
$
$
6,604 $
(3,010)
3,594
(3,273)
(321)
– $
260 $
(50)
210
(172)
(38)
– $
941 $
–
941
–
–
941 $
4,783 $
–
4,783
–
–
4,783 $
7,545
(3,010)
4,535
(3,273)
(321)
941
5,043
(50)
4,993
(172)
(38)
4,783
(1) Excludes excess non-cash collateral received of $1.1 billion, as the collateral offset is limited to the net estimated fair value of
derivatives after application of netting arrangements.
(2) Excludes excess non-cash collateral pledged of $8 million, as the collateral offset is limited to the net estimated fair value of
derivatives after application of netting arrangements.
7. DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
The following table reconciles DAC, VOBA and DSI (in millions) to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
DAC, VOBA and DSI
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
Traditional Life
UL and Other
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Total DAC, VOBA and DSI
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
3,873 $
455
1,418
6,232
154
265
12,397 $
3,879
479
1,383
6,100
141
253
12,235
157
The following table reconciles DFEL (in millions) to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
DFEL
Variable Annuities
UL and Other (1)
Other Operations (2)
Total DFEL
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
278 $
5,579
44
5,901 $
286
4,766
39
5,091
(1) We reported $257 million of ceded DFEL in reinsurance recoverables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2023.
(2) Represents DFEL reported in Other Operations attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreement with Protective that is excluded
from the following tables. We reported $44 million and $39 million of ceded DFEL in reinsurance recoverables on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
The following tables summarize the changes in DAC (in millions):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
Variable
Annuities
$
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Fixed
Annuities
Traditional
Life
UL and
Other
Group
Protection
Retirement
Plan
Services
3,751 $
361
(361)
3,751 $
439 $
49
(67)
421 $
1,333 $
188
(145)
1,376 $
5,605 $
482
(296)
5,791 $
141 $
113
(100)
154 $
236
21
(18)
239
Variable
Annuities
$
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Fixed
Annuities
Traditional
Life
UL and
Other
Group
Protection
Retirement
Plan
Services
3,717 $
391
(357)
3,751 $
448 $
60
(69)
439 $
1,195 $
266
(128)
1,333 $
5,360 $
539
(294)
5,605 $
140 $
98
(97)
141 $
235
20
(19)
236
$
$
DAC amortization expense of $987 million, $964 million and $958 million was recorded in commissions and other expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
158
The following tables summarize the changes in VOBA (in millions):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Business acquired (sold) through
reinsurance
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
$
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Traditional
Life
UL and
Other
Fixed
Annuities
$
17 $
50 $
465
–
–
(8)
42 $
(11)
2
(43)
413
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Traditional
Life
UL and
Other
Fixed
Annuities
$
59 $
–
(9)
50 $
511
2
(48)
465
$
–
–
(2)
15 $
20 $
–
(3)
17 $
VOBA amortization expense of $53 million, $60 million and $77 million was recorded in commissions and other expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. No
additions or write-offs were recorded for each respective year.
Estimated future amortization of VOBA (in millions), as of December 31, 2023, was as follows:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$
39
37
34
29
25
The following tables summarize the changes in DSI (in millions):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Variable
Annuities
Fixed
Annuities
UL and
Other
128 $
6
(12)
122 $
23 $
–
(4)
19 $
Retirement
Plan
Services
30 $
–
(2)
28 $
17
10
(1)
26
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Variable
Annuities
Fixed
Annuities
UL and
Other
Retirement
Plan
Services
139 $
1
(12)
128 $
27 $
–
(4)
23 $
31 $
1
(2)
30 $
14
4
(1)
17
$
$
$
$
DSI amortization expense of $19 million, $19 million and $23 million was recorded in interest credited on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
159
The following tables summarize the changes in DFEL (in millions):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Deferrals
Amortization
Balance as of end-of-year
Less: ceded DFEL
Balance as of end-of-year, net of reinsurance
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2023
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2022
Variable
Annuities
UL and
Other
Variable
Annuities
UL and
Other
$
$
286 $
19
(27)
278
–
278 $
4,766 $
1,074
(261)
5,579
257
5,322 $
291 $
23
(28)
286
–
286 $
3,934
1,061
(229)
4,766
–
4,766
DFEL amortization of $288 million, $257 million and $220 million was recorded in fee income on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
8. Reinsurance
The following summarizes reinsurance amounts (in millions) recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss),
excluding amounts attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements with Protective and Swiss Re:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Direct insurance premiums and fee income
Reinsurance assumed
Reinsurance ceded (1)
Total insurance premiums and fee income
Direct insurance benefits
Reinsurance ceded (1)
Total benefits
Direct market risk benefit (gain) loss
Reinsurance ceded
Total market risk benefit (gain) loss
Direct policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
Reinsurance ceded
Total policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
13,782 $
90
(4,733)
9,139 $
10,829 $
(4,691)
6,138 $
(2,309) $
45
(2,264) $
(224) $
72
(152) $
13,607 $
98
(2,015)
11,690 $
10,345 $
(1,866)
8,479 $
(3,517) $
271
(3,246) $
3,294 $
(528)
2,766 $
13,415
94
(1,853)
11,656
10,592
(2,089)
8,503
(4,011)
258
(3,753)
(162)
(21)
(183)
(1) Includes impacts related to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction effective in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our annuity and life insurance risks exceeding each of our
insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality
losses and to enhance our capital management. Reinsurance does not discharge us from our primary obligation to contract holders for
losses incurred under the policies we issue. We evaluate each reinsurance agreement to determine whether the agreement provides
indemnification against loss or liability.
As of December 31, 2023, the policy for our reinsurance program was to retain up to $20 million on a single insured life. As the amount
we retain varies by policy, we reinsured 27% of the mortality risk on newly issued life insurance contracts in 2023.
160
Reinsurance Exposures
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers, and we monitor concentration as well as financial strength ratings
of our reinsurers. Significant reinsurance agreements are discussed below.
Fortitude Re
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into two reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re, an authorized Bermuda reinsurer with
reciprocal jurisdiction reinsurer status in Indiana, to reinsure certain blocks of in-force UL with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”),
MoneyGuard® and fixed annuity products, including group pension annuities. Fortitude Re represents our largest reinsurance exposure
as of December 31, 2023.
The first agreement is structured as a coinsurance treaty between us and Fortitude Re for the ULSG and fixed annuities blocks. As
significant insurance risk was transferred for ULSG products and life-contingent annuities, amounts recoverable from Fortitude Re were
$10.5 billion as of December 31, 2023. We recorded a deferred loss on the transaction of $2.7 billion, of which $11 million was amortized
during 2023. Annuities that are not life-contingent do not contain significant insurance risk; therefore, we recorded deposit assets for
these contracts of $4.2 billion as of December 31, 2023.
The second agreement is structured as coinsurance with funds withheld for the MoneyGuard block; however, as we retained significant
insurance risk under the agreement, we recorded deposit assets of $7.8 billion as of December 31, 2023. In this coinsurance with funds
withheld reinsurance agreement, we as the ceding company withhold, and therefore retain, the assets backing the deposit assets. We held
investments with a carrying value of $9.9 billion in support of reserves associated with the Fortitude Re transaction in a funds withheld
arrangement as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, the portfolio included fixed maturity AFS securities, other investments,
cash and invested cash and accrued investment income that had carrying values of $8.9 billion, $759 million, $141 million and
$103 million, respectively. See “Realized Gain (Loss)” in Note 21 for information on reinsurance-related embedded derivatives.
Resolution Life
Effective October 1, 2021, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (a subsidiary of
Resolution Life that we refer to herein as “Resolution Life”) to reinsure liabilities under a block of in-force executive benefit and universal
life policies. The agreement is structured as coinsurance for the general account reserves and modified coinsurance for the separate
account reserves. Amounts recoverable from Resolution Life were $5.0 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Resolution Life has funded trusts, the balances of which change as a result of ongoing reinsurance activity to support the business ceded,
that totaled $3.8 billion and $4.1 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We recognized a realized gain of $635 million in
2021 for the coinsurance portion of the transaction upon the transfer of a portfolio of assets to Resolution Life.
Protective
The sale of individual life and individual and group annuity business acquired from Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
completed May 1, 2018 resulted in amounts recoverable from Protective of $9.1 billion and $9.6 billion as of December 31, 2023 and
2022, respectively. Protective has funded trusts, of which the balance in the trusts changes as a result of ongoing reinsurance activity, to
support the business ceded, which totaled $10.5 billion and $11.5 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Protective
represents our second largest reinsurance exposure as of December 31, 2023.
161
Athene
Effective October 1, 2018, we entered into a modified coinsurance agreement with Athene Holding Ltd. (“Athene”) to reinsure fixed
annuity products, which resulted in a deposit asset of $2.7 billion and $3.8 billion as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We
held assets in support of reserves associated with the Athene transaction in a modified coinsurance investment portfolio, which consisted
of the following (in millions):
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other investments
Cash and invested cash
Accrued investment income
Other assets
Total
As of December 31,
2022
2023
177 $
1,556
58
288
43
41
582
23
6
2,774 $
474
2,644
60
487
39
42
26
35
2
3,809
$
$
The portfolio was supported by $77 million of over-collateralization and a $83 million letter of credit as of December 31, 2023.
Additionally, we recorded a deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance related to the transaction with Athene and amortized
$33 million, $25 million and $26 million of the gain during 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See “Realized Gain (Loss)” in Note 21 for
information on reinsurance-related embedded derivatives.
Swiss Re
Our reinsurance operations were acquired by Swiss Re in December 2001 through a series of indemnity reinsurance transactions. As
such, Swiss Re reinsured certain liabilities and obligations under the indemnity reinsurance agreements. As we are not relieved of our
liability to the ceding companies for this business, the liabilities and obligations associated with the reinsured policies remain on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets with a corresponding reinsurance recoverable from Swiss Re, which totaled $1.6 billion as of December 31,
2023 and 2022, respectively. Swiss Re has funded a trust, with a balance of $656 million and $710 million as of December 31, 2023 and
2022, respectively, to support this business. In addition to various remedies that we would have in the event of a default by Swiss Re, we
continue to hold assets in support of certain of the transferred reserves. These assets consist of those reported as trading securities and
certain mortgage loans.
Credit Losses on Reinsurance-Related Assets
In connection with our recognition of an allowance for credit losses for reinsurance-related assets, we perform a quantitative analysis
using a probability of loss approach to estimate expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables, inclusive of similar assets recognized
using the deposit method of accounting. Our allowance for credit losses was $81 million and $317 million as of December 31, 2023 and
2022, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to the release of the allowance for credit losses related to a third-party
reinsurer, Scottish Re (U.S.) Inc. (“Scottish Re”), where liquidation proceedings commenced during the third quarter of 2023. Effective
September 30, 2023, reinsurance coverage terminated and all business ceded to Scottish Re was therefore recaptured. See Note 21 for
additional information.
162
9. Goodwill and Specifically Identifiable Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in millions) by reportable segment were as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Gross
Goodwill
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Accumulated
Impairment
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Net
Goodwill
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Net
Goodwill as
of End-
of-Year
Impairment
$
$
1,040 $
684
20
1,744 $
(600) $
–
–
(600) $
440 $
684
20
1,144 $
– $
–
–
– $
440
684
20
1,144
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Gross
Goodwill
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Accumulated
Impairment
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Net
Goodwill
as of
Beginning-
of-Year
Net
Goodwill as
of End-
of-Year
Impairment
$
$
1,040 $
2,188
684
20
3,932 $
(600) $
(1,554)
–
–
(2,154) $
440 $
634
684
20
1,778 $
– $
(634)
–
–
(634) $
440
–
684
20
1,144
Annuities
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Total goodwill
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Total goodwill
The fair values of our reporting units (Level 3 fair value estimates) are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the
value of new business. Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we
expect to issue in the future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the
values of in-force and new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected,
weighted-average rate of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each
reporting unit.
2023 Analysis
As of October 1, 2023, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Annuities, Group Protection and
Retirement Plan Services reporting units, and, as of such date, the fair value was in excess of each reporting unit’s carrying value.
2022 Analysis
As a result of the capital market environment during the third quarter of 2022, including (i) declining equity markets and (ii) the impact of
rising interest rates on our discount rate assumption, we accelerated our quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Life Insurance
reporting unit as we concluded that there were indicators of impairment. Based on this quantitative test, which included updating our
best estimate assumptions therein, we incurred an impairment during the third quarter of 2022 of the Life Insurance reporting unit
goodwill of $634 million, which represented a write-off of the entire balance of goodwill for the reporting unit.
As of October 1, 2022, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our other reporting units, and, as of such date,
the fair value was in excess of the carrying value for each of the Annuities, Group Protection and Retirement Plan Services reporting
units.
163
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization (in millions) for each major specifically identifiable intangible asset class by
reportable segment were as follows:
As of December 31, 2023
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
As of December 31, 2022
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Life Insurance:
Sales force
Group Protection:
VOCRA
VODA
Retirement Plan Services:
Mutual fund contract rights (1)
Total
$
$
100 $
71 $
100 $
576
31
5
712 $
145
12
–
228 $
576
31
5
712 $
67
115
10
–
192
(1) No amortization recorded as the intangible asset has indefinite life.
Future estimated amortization of specifically identifiable intangible assets (in millions) as of December 31, 2023, was as follows:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
$
37
37
37
37
37
294
164
10. MRBs
The following table reconciles MRBs (in millions) to MRB assets and MRB liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
Retirement Plan Services
Total MRBs
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Assets
Liabilities
Net
(Assets)
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Net
(Assets)
Liabilities
$
$
3,763 $
96
35
3,894 $
1,583 $
128
5
1,716 $
(2,180) $
32
(30)
(2,178) $
2,666 $
117
24
2,807 $
2,004 $
72
2
2,078 $
(662)
(45)
(22)
(729)
The following table summarizes the balances of and changes in net MRB (assets) liabilities (in millions):
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2023
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2022
Variable
Annuities
Fixed
Annuities
Retirement
Plan
Services
Variable
Annuities
Fixed
Annuities
Retirement
Plan
Services
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Less: Effect of cumulative changes in
non-performance risk
Balance as of beginning-of-year, before the effect
of changes in non-performance risk
Issuances
Attributed fees collected
Benefit payments
Effect of changes in interest rates
Effect of changes in equity markets
Effect of changes in equity index volatility
In-force updates and other changes in MRBs (1)
Effect of assumption review:
Effect of changes in future expected
policyholder behavior
Effect of changes in other future expected
assumptions (2)
Balance as of end-of-year, before the effect of
changes in non-performance risk
Effect of cumulative changes in
non-performance risk
Balance as of end-of-year
Less: ceded MRB assets (liabilities)
Balance as of end-of-year, net of reinsurance
Weighted-average age of policyholders (years)
Net amount at risk (3)
$
(662) $
(45) $
(22) $
2,398 $
114 $
(1)
(2,173)
(40)
(2)
(2,425)
(44)
(13)
1,511
8
1,497
(64)
(110)
(3,167)
(593)
136
(33)
(66)
(881)
(1,299)
(2,180)
(238)
(1,942) $
(5)
–
32
–
(24)
(12)
9
5
70
15
90
(20)
–
6
–
5
(13)
(3)
1
4,823
12
1,571
(63)
(9,346)
4,293
(225)
661
158
–
32
–
(232)
12
14
10
–
(158)
(2)
(57)
1
–
(26)
1,511
(5)
(58)
32
–
32 $
(4)
(30)
–
(30) $
(2,173)
(662)
(193)
(469) $
(40)
(45)
–
(45) $
72
3,031 $
68
203 $
63
4 $
71
7,974 $
68
171 $
$
$
12
(3)
6
–
(55)
18
(1)
3
–
–
(20)
(2)
(22)
–
(22)
63
15
(1) Consists primarily of changes in MRB assets and liabilities related to differences between separate account fund performance and
modeled indices and other changes such as actual to expected policyholder behavior.
(2) Consists primarily of the update of fund mapping, volatility and other capital market assumptions.
(3) Net amount at risk (“NAR”) is the current guaranteed minimum benefit in excess of the current account balance as of the balance
sheet date. For GLBs, the guaranteed minimum benefit is calculated based on the present value of GLB payments. Our variable
annuity products may offer more than one type of guaranteed benefit rider to a policyholder. In instances where more than one
guaranteed benefit feature exists in a contract, the guaranteed benefit rider that provides the highest NAR is used in the calculation.
165
Effect of Assumption Review
For the year ended December 31, 2023, Variable Annuities had a favorable impact to net income (loss) attributable to the annual
assumption review from updates to volatility and policyholder GLB utilization behavior assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable
impacts from updates to mortality and policyholder lapse behavior assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Fixed Annuities
had an unfavorable impact to net income (loss) attributable to the annual assumption review from updates to mortality and policyholder
GLB utilization and lapse behavior assumptions. Retirement Plan Services did not have any significant assumption updates.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, Variable Annuities had a favorable impact to net income (loss) attributable to the annual
assumption review from updates to policyholder benefit utilization behavior and fund mapping and volatility assumptions. Fixed
Annuities and Retirement Plan Services did not have any significant assumption updates.
See “MRBs” in Note 1 and Note 15 for details related to our fair value judgments, assumptions, inputs and valuation methodology.
11. Separate Accounts
The following table presents the fair value of separate account assets (in millions) reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets by major
investment category:
Mutual funds and collective investment trusts
Exchange-traded funds
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Cash and invested cash
Other investments
Total separate account assets
As of December 31,
2022
2023
142,892
157,578 $
258
350
169
167
98
25
119
137
143,536
158,257 $
$
$
The following table reconciles separate account liabilities (in millions) to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Variable Annuities
UL and Other
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations (1)
Total separate account liabilities
As of December 31,
2022
2023
105,573
113,356 $
20,920
25,150
16,996
19,699
47
52
143,536
158,257 $
$
$
(1) Represents separate account liabilities reported in Other Operations primarily attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements
with Protective ($46 million and $42 million as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively) that are excluded from
the following tables.
166
The following table summarizes the balances of and changes in separate account liabilities (in millions):
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2023
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2022
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Gross deposits
Withdrawals
Policyholder assessments
Change in market performance
Net transfers from (to) general account
Balance as of end-of-year
Variable
Annuities
$
105,573 $
2,982
(10,177)
(2,510)
16,870
618
113,356 $
$
UL and
Other
Retirement
Plan
Services
Variable
Annuities
UL and
Other
Retirement
Plan
Services
20,920 $
1,630
(313)
(964)
3,973
(96)
25,150 $
16,996 $
2,222
(2,527)
(163)
3,221
(50)
19,699 $
136,665 $
3,371
(9,238)
(2,603)
(23,194)
572
105,573 $
24,785 $
1,900
(454)
(938)
(4,371)
(2)
20,920 $
21,068
2,378
(2,378)
(164)
(3,710)
(198)
16,996
Cash surrender value
$
111,928 $
22,760 $
19,684 $
103,987 $
18,666 $
16,982
12. Policyholder Account Balances
The following table reconciles policyholder account balances (in millions) to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Variable Annuities
Fixed Annuities
UL and Other
Retirement Plan Services
Other (1)
Total policyholder account balances
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
29,141 $
25,355
37,180
23,784
5,277
120,737 $
22,184
23,365
37,694
25,138
6,054
114,435
(1) Represents policyholder account balances reported primarily in Other Operations attributable to the indemnity reinsurance
agreements with Protective ($4.9 billion and $5.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively) that are
excluded from the following tables.
167
The following table summarizes the balances and changes in policyholder account balances (in millions):
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Gross deposits
Withdrawals
Policyholder assessments
Net transfers from (to) separate account
Interest credited
Change in fair value of embedded derivative
instruments
Balance as of end-of-year
Weighted-average crediting rate
Net amount at risk (1)(2)
Cash surrender value
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Gross deposits
Withdrawals
Policyholder assessments
Net transfers from (to) separate account
Interest credited
Change in fair value of embedded derivative
instruments
Balance as of end-of-year
Weighted-average crediting rate
Net amount at risk (1)(2)
Cash surrender value
Variable
Annuities
$
Fixed
Annuities
UL and
Other
Retirement
Plan
Services
22,184 $
4,709
(742)
(1)
(427)
548
23,365 $
5,130
(3,929)
(56)
–
643
37,694 $
3,755
(1,454)
(4,512)
97
1,479
25,138
2,776
(4,494)
(14)
(295)
673
$
$
2,870
29,141 $
202
25,355 $
121
37,180 $
–
23,784
2.1 %
3,031 $
27,975
2.7 %
4.0 %
203 $
24,349
302,712 $
33,629
2.7 %
4
23,765
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Variable
Annuities
$
Fixed
Annuities
UL and
Other
Retirement
Plan
Services
19,148 $
5,178
(417)
(2)
(492)
287
22,552 $
3,284
(2,514)
(51)
–
532
38,200 $
3,921
(1,244)
(4,496)
2
1,494
23,579
4,012
(3,579)
(13)
510
629
$
$
(1,518)
22,184 $
(438)
23,365 $
(183)
37,694 $
–
25,138
1.4 %
7,974
21,147
$
2.4 %
171
22,529
3.9 %
$ 304,348
34,210
$
2.6 %
15
25,133
(1) NAR is the current guaranteed minimum benefit in excess of the current account balance as of the balance sheet date. For GLBs,
the guaranteed minimum benefit is calculated based on the present value of GLB payments. Our variable annuity products may offer
more than one type of guaranteed benefit rider to a policyholder. In instances where more than one guaranteed benefit rider exists in
a contract, the guaranteed benefit rider that provides the highest NAR is used in the calculation.
(2) Calculation is based on total account balances and includes both policyholder account balances and separate account balances.
168
The following table presents policyholder account balances (in millions) by range of guaranteed minimum crediting rates and the related
range of difference, in basis points, between the interest being credited to policyholders and the respective guaranteed contract
minimums:
Range of Guaranteed
Minimum Crediting Rate
Variable Annuities
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
Fixed Annuities
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
UL and Other
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
Retirement Plan Services
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Total
As of December 31, 2023
At
Guaranteed
Minimum
1-50
Basis
Points
Above
51-100
Basis
Points
Above
101-150
Basis
Points
Above
Greater
Than 150
Basis
Points
Above
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
– $
5
576
1,370
10
–
1,961 $
696 $
426
1,806
927
180
–
4,035 $
275 $
557
6,925
15,587
3,730
–
27,074 $
452 $
550
2,492
5,012
1,610
10,116 $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
511 $
97
35
–
–
–
643 $
– $
–
11
–
–
–
11 $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
546 $
235
6
–
–
–
787 $
195 $
–
148
1
–
–
344 $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
505 $
527
–
–
–
–
1,032 $
121 $
–
–
–
–
–
121 $
569 $
2,065
–
–
–
2,634 $
744 $
1,575
–
–
–
2,319 $
4,904 $
832
–
–
–
5,736 $
– $
7
–
–
–
–
7 $
2,429 $
3,081
18
–
–
–
5,528 $
352 $
3,125
–
–
–
–
3,477 $
2,979 $
–
–
–
–
2,979 $
–
12
576
1,370
10
27,173
29,141
4,687
4,366
1,865
927
180
13,330
25,355
943
3,682
7,084
15,588
3,730
6,153
37,180
9,648
5,022
2,492
5,012
1,610
23,784
169
Range of Guaranteed
Minimum Crediting Rate
Variable Annuities
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
Fixed Annuities
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
UL and Other
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Other (1)
Total
Retirement Plan Services
Up to 1.00%
1.01% - 2.00%
2.01% - 3.00%
3.01% - 4.00%
4.01% and above
Total
As of December 31, 2022
At
Guaranteed
Minimum
1-50
Basis
Points
Above
51-100
Basis
Points
Above
101-150
Basis
Points
Above
Greater
Than 150
Basis
Points
Above
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
– $
4
658
1,545
11
–
2,218 $
891 $
544
1,973
1,353
193
–
4,954 $
318 $
558
7,218
16,282
3,824
–
28,200 $
961 $
1,774
2,711
5,622
1,511
12,579 $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
589 $
179
1
–
–
–
769 $
194 $
–
–
1
–
–
195 $
– $
8
–
–
–
–
8 $
563 $
492
–
–
–
–
1,055 $
29 $
–
–
–
–
–
29 $
4,304 $
982
–
–
–
5,286 $
1,703 $
462
–
–
–
2,165 $
– $
–
–
–
–
–
– $
1,329 $
1,057
–
–
–
–
2,386 $
292 $
3,282
–
–
–
–
3,574 $
1,908 $
–
–
–
–
1,908 $
–
12
658
1,545
11
19,958
22,184
3,869
2,416
1,979
1,353
193
13,555
23,365
833
3,840
7,374
16,283
3,824
5,540
37,694
9,877
5,415
2,712
5,623
1,511
25,138
(1) Consists of indexed account balances that include the fair value of embedded derivative instruments, payout annuity account
balances, short-term dollar cost averaging annuities business and policy loans.
170
13. Future Contract Benefits
The following table reconciles future contract benefits (in millions) to the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Payout Annuities (1)
Traditional Life (1)
Group Protection (2)
UL and Other (3)
Other Operations (4)
Other (5)
Total future contract benefits
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
2,085 $
3,841
5,689
15,000
9,879
3,371
39,864 $
2,004
3,509
5,462
14,818
9,782
3,251
38,826
(1) See “LFPB” below for further information.
(2) See “Liability for Future Claims” below for further information.
(3) See “Additional Liabilities for Other Insurance Benefits” below for further information.
(4) Represents future contract benefits reported in Other Operations primarily attributable to the indemnity reinsurance agreements
with Protective ($5.6 billion and $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively) and Swiss Re
($2.2 billion and $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively) that are excluded from the following
tables.
(5) Represents other miscellaneous reserves that are not representative of long-duration contracts and are excluded from the following
tables.
171
LFPB
The following table summarizes the balances of and changes in the present values of expected net premiums and LFPB (in millions,
except years):
Present Value of Expected Net Premiums
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Less: Effect of cumulative changes in discount
rate assumptions
Beginning balance at original discount rate
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions
Effect of actual variances from expected experience
Adjusted balance as of beginning-of-year
Issuances
Interest accrual
Net premiums collected
Flooring impact of LFPB
Ending balance at original discount rate
Effect of cumulative changes in discount rate assumptions
Balance as of end-of-year
Present Value of Expected LFPB
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Less: Effect of cumulative changes in discount
rate assumptions
Beginning balance at original discount rate (1)
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions
Effect of actual variances from expected experience
Adjusted balance as of beginning-of-year
Issuances
Interest accrual
Benefit payments
Ending balance at original discount rate (1)
Effect of cumulative changes in discount rate assumptions
Balance as of end-of-year
Net balance as of end-of-year
Less: reinsurance recoverables (2)
Net balance as of end-of-year, net of reinsurance
Weighted-average duration of future policyholder
benefit liability (years)
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2023
As of or For the Year Ended
December 31, 2022
Payout
Annuities
Traditional
Life
Payout
Annuities
Traditional
Life
$
– $
6,063 $
– $
6,858
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– $
(582)
6,645
(12)
(303)
6,330
579
244
(804)
(1)
6,348
(148)
6,200 $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– $
883
5,975
(484)
50
5,541
1,656
222
(765)
(9)
6,645
(582)
6,063
2,004 $
9,572 $
2,512 $
11,008
(263)
2,267
–
1
2,268
109
86
(191)
2,272
(187)
2,085 $
2,085 $
1,617
468 $
(785)
10,357
(29)
(333)
9,995
580
387
(732)
10,230
(189)
10,041 $
3,841 $
445
3,396 $
266
2,246
–
3
2,249
122
84
(188)
2,267
(263)
2,004 $
2,004 $
3
2,001 $
1,561
9,447
(415)
69
9,101
1,655
356
(755)
10,357
(785)
9,572
3,509
532
2,977
9
9
9
10
$
$
$
$
$
(1) Includes DPL within Payout Annuities of $56 million, $38 million and $22 million as of December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022 and
December 31, 2021, respectively.
(2) Increase in Payout Annuities reinsurance recoverables driven by the reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re effective October 1,
2023 for certain blocks of in-force life-contingent payout fixed annuities. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction.
172
For the year ended December 31, 2023, Payout Annuities did not have any significant assumption updates. For the year ended December
31, 2023, Traditional Life had a favorable cash flow assumption impact from updates to mortality assumptions, partially offset by an
unfavorable impact from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Payout Annuities
and Traditional Life did not have any significantly different actual experience compared to expected.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, Payout Annuities did not have any significant assumption updates. Traditional Life had an
unfavorable cash flow assumption impact to net income (loss) attributable to the annual assumption review from updates to mortality and
lapse assumptions resulting in lower projected premiums and benefits, and a corresponding increase in reserves. For the year ended
December 31, 2022, Payout Annuities and Traditional Life did not have any significantly different actual experience compared to
expected.
The following table summarizes the discounted and undiscounted expected future gross premiums and expected future benefit payments
(in millions):
Payout Annuities
Expected future gross premiums
Expected future benefit payments
Traditional Life
Expected future gross premiums
Expected future benefit payments
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Undiscounted
Discounted
Undiscounted
Discounted
$
– $
3,483
– $
2,085
– $
3,472
14,015
13,894
9,815
10,041
13,945
13,640
–
2,004
9,475
9,572
The following table summarizes the gross premiums and interest accretion (in millions) recognized in insurance premiums and benefits,
respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Payout Annuities
Gross premiums
Interest accretion
Traditional Life
Gross premiums
Interest accretion
$
116 $
86
133 $
84
1,252
143
1,211
134
95
84
1,103
134
The following table summarizes the weighted-average interest rates:
Payout Annuities
Interest accretion rate
Current discount rate
Traditional Life
Interest accretion rate
Current discount rate
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
3.9 %
4.9 %
5.0 %
4.6 %
3.9 %
5.3 %
5.1 %
5.1 %
173
Liability for Future Claims
The following table summarizes the balances of and changes in liability for future claims (in millions, except years):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
5,462 $
5,936
Group Protection
As of or For the Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
Less: Effect of cumulative changes in discount
rate assumptions
Beginning balance at original discount rate
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions
Effect of actual variances from expected
experience
Adjusted beginning-of-year balance
New incidence
Interest
Benefit payments
Ending balance at original discount rate
Effect of cumulative changes in discount
rate assumptions
Balance as of end-of-year
Less: reinsurance recoverables
Balance as of end-of-year, net of reinsurance
(597)
6,059
(27)
(261)
5,771
1,702
159
(1,453)
6,179
(490)
5,689
123
5,566 $
262
5,674
15
(117)
5,572
1,777
141
(1,431)
6,059
(597)
5,462
127
5,335
$
Weighted-average duration of liability for future
claims (years)
5
4
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we had a favorable cash flow assumption impact to net income (loss) attributable to the annual
assumption review from updates to long-term disability and life waiver claim termination rate assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable
impacts from updates to long-term disability social security offset assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we experienced
more favorable reported incidence and claim terminations than assumed.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had an unfavorable cash flow assumption impact to net income (loss) attributable to the
annual assumption review from updates to the long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions, partially offset by favorable
impacts from updates to the life waiver termination rate assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we experienced more
favorable claim terminations than assumed.
The following table summarizes the discounted and undiscounted expected future benefit payments (in millions):
Group Protection
Expected future benefit payments
As of December 31, 2023
As of December 31, 2022
Undiscounted
Discounted
Undiscounted
Discounted
$
7,250 $
6,179 $
7,063 $
6,059
174
The following table summarizes the gross premiums and interest accretion (in millions) recognized in insurance premiums and benefits,
respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Group Protection
Gross premiums
Interest accretion
For the Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
$
3,549 $
159
3,393 $
141
3,145
145
The following table summarizes the weighted-average interest rates:
Group Protection
Interest accretion rate
Current discount rate
Additional Liabilities for Other Insurance Benefits
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
3.0 %
4.7 %
2.8 %
5.1 %
The following table summarizes the balances of and changes in additional liabilities for other insurance benefits (in millions, except years):
Balance as of beginning-of-year
$
14,818 $
12,556
UL and Other
As of or For the Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
Less: Effect of cumulative changes in shadow
balance in AOCI
Balance as of beginning-of-year, excluding
shadow balance in AOCI
Effect of changes in cash flow assumptions
Effect of actual variances from expected
experience
Adjusted beginning-of-year balance
Issuances
Interest accrual
Net assessments collected
Benefit payments
Balance as of end-of-year, excluding
shadow balance in AOCI
Effect of cumulative changes in shadow
balance in AOCI
Balance as of end-of-year
Less: reinsurance recoverables (1)
Balance as of end-of-year, net of reinsurance
(905)
1,113
15,723
173
(71)
15,825
–
775
1,210
(588)
11,443
3,108
195
14,746
7
626
972
(628)
17,222
15,723
(2,222)
15,000
4,708
10,292 $
(905)
14,818
856
13,962
$
Weighted-average duration of additional liabilities
for other insurance benefits (years)
17
17
(1) Increase in reinsurance recoverables driven by the reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re effective October 1, 2023 for certain
blocks of in-force ULSG. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction.
175
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we had an unfavorable cash flow assumption impact to net income (loss) attributable to the
annual assumption review from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions, partially offset by a favorable impact from updates to
interest rate assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we did not have any significantly different actual experience compared
to expected.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had an unfavorable cash flow assumption impact to net income (loss) attributable to the
annual assumption review primarily from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary
guarantees in the amount of $1.9 billion, net of reinsurance, after-tax, and to a lesser extent mortality and morbidity assumptions. For the
year ended December 31, 2022, we had unfavorable actual mortality experience compared to expected due to ongoing effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
The following table summarizes the gross assessments and interest accretion (in millions) recognized in insurance premiums and benefits,
respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
UL and Other
Gross assessments
Interest accretion
$
3,219 $
775
2,818 $
626
3,150
498
The following table summarizes the weighted-average interest rates:
UL and Other
Interest accretion rate
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2023
2022
5.3 %
5.0 %
176
14. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Details underlying short-term and long-term debt (in millions) were as follows:
$
$
$
Short-Term Debt
Current maturities of long-term debt
Total short-term debt
Long-Term Debt, Excluding Current Portion
Senior notes:
3.35% notes, due 2025 (1)
3.625% notes, due 2026 (1)
3.80% notes, due 2028 (1)
3.05% notes, due 2030 (1)
3.40% notes, due 2031 (1)
3.40% notes, due 2032 (1)
6.15% notes, due 2036 (1)
6.30% notes, due 2037 (1)(2)
7.00% notes, due 2040 (1)(2)
4.35% notes, due 2048 (1)
4.375% notes, due 2050 (1)
Total senior notes
Term loans:
Variable, due 2024 (3)
Total term loans
Subordinated notes:
Variable, due 2066 (4) (5)
Variable, due 2067 (4) (6)
Total subordinated notes
Capital securities:
Variable, due 2066 (4) (7)
Variable, due 2067 (4) (8)
Total capital securities
Unamortized premiums (discounts)
Unamortized debt issuance costs
Unamortized adjustments from discontinued hedges
Fair value hedge on interest rate swap agreements
Total long-term debt
$
As of December 31,
2022
2023
250 $
250 $
500
500
300 $
400
500
500
500
300
243
375
500
450
300
4,368
–
–
562
433
995
160
58
218
(6)
(30)
326
(172)
5,699 $
300
400
500
500
500
300
243
375
500
450
300
4,368
250
250
562
433
995
160
58
218
(6)
(34)
341
(177)
5,955
(1) We have the option to repurchase the outstanding notes by paying the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be
redeemed or the make-whole amount (as defined in each note agreement), plus in each case any accrued and unpaid interest as of the
date of redemption.
(2) Categorized as operating debt for leverage ratio calculations as the proceeds were primarily used as a long-term structured solution to
reduce the strain on increasing statutory reserves associated with secondary guarantee UL and term policies.
(3) Transitioned from London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)-based to Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”)-based interest
rates, plus an applicable transition spread of 10 basis points due to the discontinued publication of LIBOR effective after June 30,
2023. Our applicable credit spread was 112.5 basis points as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
(4) To hedge the variability in rates, we purchased interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining
terms of the subordinated notes and capital securities.
(5) Transitioned from LIBOR-based to 3-Month ISDA SOFR-based interest rates after June 30, 2023, plus a credit spread of 236 basis
points.
177
(6) Transitioned from LIBOR-based to 3-Month ISDA SOFR-based interest rates after June 30, 2023, plus a credit spread of 204 basis
points.
(7) Transitioned from LIBOR-based to 3-Month Term SOFR-based interest rates after June 30, 2023, plus a transition spread of 26.161
basis points after June 30, 2023, plus a credit spread of 236 basis points.
(8) Transitioned from LIBOR-based to 3-Month Term SOFR-based interest rates after June 30, 2023, plus a transition spread of 26.161
basis points after June 30, 2023, plus a credit spread of 204 basis points.
Details underlying the recognition of a gain (loss) on the modification or early extinguishment of debt (in millions) reported within
interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Principal balance outstanding prior to modification
or payoff (1)
Unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts
Amount exchanged or paid to modify or retire debt
Gain (loss) on modification or early
extinguishment of debt, pre-tax
$
$
– $
–
–
– $
– $
–
–
– $
995
–
(1,003)
(8)
(1) During 2021, we completed the exchange of a portion of our outstanding capital securities for newly issued subordinated notes. In
connection with the exchange offer, we solicited and received the requisite number of consents to amend the indentures governing
the remaining outstanding capital securities to eliminate various terms and conditions and other provisions, including the covenant
that required us to make interest payments in accordance with an alternative coupon satisfaction mechanism upon the occurrence of
certain trigger events.
Future principal payments due on long-term debt (in millions) as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
Total
$
$
250
300
400
–
500
4,381
5,831
For our long-term debt outstanding, unsecured senior debt, which consists of senior notes and a term loan, ranks highest in priority,
followed by subordinated notes and then capital securities.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
During August 2020, LNC entered into a 10-year facility agreement (the “facility agreement”) with a Delaware trust in connection with
the sale by the trust of $500 million of pre-capitalized trust securities in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. The trust invested the proceeds from the sale of the trust securities in a portfolio of principal and interest strips of
U.S. Treasury securities. The facility agreement provides LNC the right to issue and sell to the trust, on one or more occasions, up to an
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $500 million of LNC’s 2.330% senior notes due August 15, 2030 (“2.330%
senior notes”) in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by the trust. The 2.330% senior notes will not be
issued unless and until the issuance right is exercised. In return, LNC pays a semi-annual facility fee to the trust at a rate of 1.691% per
year (applied to the unexercised portion of the maximum amount of senior notes that LNC could issue and sell to the trust), and LNC
reimburses the trust for its expenses.
The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure to make certain payments to the trust, such as paying the facility
fee or reimbursing the trust for its expenses, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving
LNC. We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below a
minimum threshold (which was $2.75 billion as of December 31, 2023, and is subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases)
and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement.
178
Prior to any involuntary exercise of the issuance right, LNC has the right to repurchase any or all of the 2.330% senior notes then held by
the trust in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities. LNC may redeem any outstanding 2.330% senior notes, in whole or in part, prior to
their maturity. Prior to May 15, 2030, the redemption price will equal the greater of par or a make-whole redemption price. After
May 15, 2030, any outstanding 2.330% senior notes may be redeemed at par.
Credit Facilities
Credit facilities, which allow for borrowing or issuances of letters of credit (“LOCs”), (in millions) were as follows:
Credit Facilities
Five-year revolving credit facility
LOC facility (1)
LOC facility (1)
Total
Expiration Date
December 21, 2028 $
August 26, 2031
October 1, 2031
$
As of December 31, 2023
Maximum
Available
LOCs Issued
2,000 $
976
859
3,835 $
126
917
859
1,902
(1) Our wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into irrevocable LOC facility agreements with third-party lenders supporting inter-company
reinsurance agreements.
On December 21, 2023, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, which amended and
restated our existing five-year revolving amended and restated credit agreement. The credit agreement, which is unsecured, allows for the
issuance of LOCs and borrowing of up to $2.0 billion and has a commitment termination date of December 21, 2028. The LOCs under
the credit facility are used primarily to satisfy reserve credit requirements of (i) our domestic insurance companies for which reserve credit
is provided by our affiliated reinsurance companies and (ii) certain ceding companies of our legacy reinsurance business.
The credit agreement, as currently in effect, contains:
•
•
•
•
Customary terms and conditions, including covenants restricting our ability to incur liens, merge or consolidate with another entity
where we are not the surviving entity and dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;
Financial covenants including maintenance of a minimum consolidated net worth equal to the sum of $8.626 billion plus 50% of the
aggregate net proceeds of equity issuances received by us after September 30, 2023, all as more fully set forth in the agreement; and a
debt-to-capital ratio as defined in accordance with the agreement not to exceed 0.35 to 1.00;
A cap on secured non-operating indebtedness and non-operating indebtedness of our subsidiaries equal to 7.5% of total
capitalization, as defined in accordance with the agreement; and
Customary events of default, subject to certain materiality thresholds and grace periods for certain of those events of default.
Upon an event of default, the credit agreement, as currently in effect, provides that, among other things, the commitments may be
terminated and the loans then outstanding may be declared due and payable. As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with all
such covenants.
Our LOC facility agreements each contain customary terms and conditions, including early termination fees, covenants restricting the
ability of the subsidiaries to incur liens, merge or consolidate with another entity and dispose of all or substantially all of their assets.
Upon an event of early termination, the agreements require the immediate payment of all or a portion of the present value of the future
LOC fees that would have otherwise been paid. Further, the agreements contain customary events of default, subject to certain
materiality thresholds and grace periods for certain of those events of default. The events of default include payment defaults, covenant
defaults, material inaccuracies in representations and warranties, bankruptcy and liquidation proceedings and other customary defaults.
Upon an event of default, the agreements provide that, among other things, obligations to issue, amend or increase the amount of any
LOC shall be terminated and any obligations shall become immediately due and payable. As of December 31, 2023, we were in
compliance with all such covenants.
Shelf Registration
We currently have an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt
securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units, depositary shares and trust preferred
securities.
179
15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments (in millions) were as follows:
Assets
Fixed maturity AFS securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other investments
Cash and invested cash
MRB assets
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives
Separate account assets
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances:
Account balances of certain investment contracts
RILA, fixed annuity and IUL contracts
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities – reinsurance-related
embedded derivatives
MRB liabilities
Short-term debt
Long-term debt
Other liabilities:
Ceded MRBs
Derivative liabilities
Remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts
As of December 31, 2023
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
As of December 31, 2022
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
$
88,738 $
2,359
306
18,963
6,474
5,015
3,365
3,894
88,738 $
2,359
306
17,407
6,474
5,015
3,365
3,894
99,736 $
3,498
427
18,301
3,594
3,739
3,343
2,807
2
940
158,257
2
940
158,257
12
525
143,536
99,736
3,498
427
16,553
3,594
3,739
3,343
2,807
12
525
143,536
(44,640)
(9,077)
(34,041)
(9,077)
(43,578)
(4,783)
(34,274)
(4,783)
(552)
(1,716)
(250)
(5,699)
(239)
(356)
(411)
(552)
(1,716)
(249)
(5,182)
(239)
(356)
(411)
416
(2,078)
(500)
(5,955)
(205)
(210)
(574)
416
(2,078)
(496)
(5,005)
(205)
(210)
(574)
Valuation Methodologies and Associated Inputs for Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used to determine the fair value of our financial instruments not
carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Considerable judgment is required to develop these assumptions used to
measure fair value. Accordingly, the estimates shown are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a one-time,
current market exchange of all of our financial instruments.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The fair value of mortgage loans on real estate, excluding mortgage loans accounted for using the fair value option, is established using a
discounted cash flow method based on credit rating, maturity and future income. The ratings for mortgages in good standing are based
on property type, location, market conditions, occupancy, debt-service coverage, loan-to-value, quality of tenancy, borrower and payment
record. The fair value for impaired mortgage loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate, the loan’s market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The inputs used to
measure the fair value of our mortgage loans on real estate, excluding mortgage loans accounted for using the fair value option, are
classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
180
Other Investments
The carrying value of our assets classified as other investments, excluding short-term investments, approximates fair value. Other
investments includes primarily LPs and other privately held investments that are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and
the carrying value is based on our proportional share of the net assets of the LPs. Other investments also includes FHLB stock carried at
cost and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our
LPs, other privately held investments and FHLB stock are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The remaining assets in
other investments include cash collateral receivables and securities that are not LPs or other privately held investments. The inputs used
to measure the fair value of these assets are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Separate Account Assets
Separate account assets are primarily carried at fair value. A portion of our separate account assets includes LPs, which are accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value is based on our proportional share of the net assets of the LPs and
approximates fair value. The inputs used to measure the fair value of the separate account asset LPs are classified as Level 3 within the
fair value hierarchy.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include account balances of certain investment contracts. The fair value of the account balances of certain
investment contracts is based on their approximate surrender value as of the balance sheet date. The inputs used to measure the fair
value of these policyholder account balances are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities include remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts. The fair value for the remaining guaranteed interest and
similar contracts is estimated using discounted cash flow calculations as of the balance sheet date. These calculations are based on interest
rates currently offered on similar contracts with maturities that are consistent with those remaining for the contracts being valued. As of
December 31, 2023 and 2022, the remaining guaranteed interest and similar contracts carrying value approximated fair value. The inputs
used to measure the fair value of these other liabilities are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
The fair value of short-term and long-term debt is based on quoted market prices. The inputs used to measure the fair value of our short-
term and long-term debt are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Option
Mortgage loans on real estate, net of allowance for credit losses, as reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, includes mortgage loans
on real estate for which the fair value option was elected. The fair value option allows us to elect fair value as an alternative measurement
for mortgage loans not otherwise reported at fair value. We have made these elections for certain mortgage loans associated with
modified coinsurance agreements to help mitigate the inconsistency in earnings that would otherwise result from the use of embedded
derivatives included with these loans. Changes in fair value are reflected in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk are estimated using changes in credit spreads
and quality ratings for the period reported. Mortgage loans on real estate for which the fair value option was elected are valued using
third-party pricing services. We have procedures in place to review the valuations each quarter to ensure they are reasonable, including
utilizing a separate third party to reperform the valuation for a selection of mortgage loans on an annual basis. Due to lack of observable
inputs, mortgage loans electing the fair value option are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value and aggregate contractual principal for mortgage loans on real estate where the fair value option was elected (in millions)
were as follows:
Fair value
Aggregate contractual principal
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
288 $
326
487
514
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no loans for which the fair value option was elected were in non-accrual status, and none were more
than 90 days past due and still accruing interest.
181
Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
We did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2023 or 2022.
The following summarizes our financial instruments carried at fair value (in millions) on a recurring basis by the fair value hierarchy levels:
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments (1)
Other investments – short-term investments
Cash and invested cash
MRB assets
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives
Separate account assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances – RILA, fixed annuity
and IUL contracts
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities – reinsurance-related
embedded derivatives
MRB liabilities
Other liabilities:
Ceded MRBs
Derivative liabilities (1)
Total liabilities
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
As of December 31, 2023
Significant
Observable Unobservable
Significant
Inputs
(Level 2)
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
$
– $
374
–
–
–
–
–
46
–
1
–
–
–
–
–
67,160 $
19
2,785
283
1,760
1,416
10,687
153
2,075
263
–
10,874
233
3,365
–
2,497 $
–
5
–
13
8
1,484
48
284
42
288
622
–
–
3,894
69,657
393
2,790
283
1,773
1,424
12,171
247
2,359
306
288
11,496
233
3,365
3,894
–
–
402
823 $
–
–
157,855
258,928 $
2
940
–
10,127 $
2
940
158,257
269,878
– $
– $
(9,077) $
(9,077)
–
–
–
–
– $
237
–
(789)
(1,716)
–
(4,792)
(4,555) $
(239)
(586)
(12,407) $
(552)
(1,716)
(239)
(5,378)
(16,962)
$
$
$
182
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
As of December 31, 2022
Significant
Observable Unobservable
Significant
Inputs
(Level 2)
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
$
– $
359
–
–
–
–
–
41
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
76,728 $
20
5,035
318
2,008
1,674
9,787
269
2,917
274
–
6,048
75
3,343
–
–
–
412
812 $
–
–
143,124
251,620 $
2,295 $
–
35
–
1
–
1,117
49
581
153
487
605
–
–
2,807
12
525
–
8,667 $
79,023
379
5,070
318
2,009
1,674
10,904
359
3,498
427
487
6,653
75
3,343
2,807
12
525
143,536
261,099
– $
– $
(4,783) $
(4,783)
–
–
–
–
– $
416
–
–
(2,666)
(2,250) $
–
(2,078)
(205)
(603)
(7,669) $
416
(2,078)
(205)
(3,269)
(9,919)
$
$
$
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments (1)
Other investments – short-term investments
Cash and invested cash
MRB assets
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs
Indexed annuity ceded embedded derivatives
Separate account assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts embedded derivatives
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities – reinsurance-related
embedded derivatives
MRB liabilities
Other liabilities:
Ceded MRBs
Derivative liabilities (1)
Total liabilities
(1) Derivative investment assets and liabilities are presented within the fair value hierarchy on a gross basis by derivative type and not on
a master netting basis by counterparty.
183
The following summarizes changes to our financial instruments carried at fair value (in millions) and classified within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy. The gains and losses below may include changes in fair value due in part to observable inputs that are a component of
the valuation methodology. The summary schedule excludes changes to MRB assets and MRB liabilities as these balances are rolled
forward in Note 10.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Items
Included
in
Net
Income
Gains
(Losses)
in
OCI
and
Other (1)
Issuances,
Sales,
Maturities,
Settlements,
Calls,
Net
Transfers
Into or
Out
of
Level 3,
Net
Ending
Fair
Value
Beginning
Fair
Value
$
2,295 $
35
1
–
1,117
49
581
153
487
2
12
525
2 $
(4)
–
–
–
–
17
(19)
(7)
(13)
(10)
6
(4,783)
(3,193)
17 $
4
–
–
9
(2)
–
–
5
–
–
–
–
194 $
(30)
5
(4)
733
(2)
(313)
(98)
(197)
16
–
409
(1,101)
(11) $
–
7
12
(375)
3
(1)
6
–
31
–
–
–
–
(205)
269 $
(789)
(34)
(4,044) $
$
–
–
33 $
–
–
(388) $
–
–
(328) $
2,497
5
13
8
1,484
48
284
42
288
36
2
940
(9,077)
(789)
(239)
(4,458)
Investments: (2)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs (3)
Indexed annuity ceded embedded
derivatives (4)
Policyholder account balances –
RILA, fixed annuity and IUL
contracts (4)
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities –
reinsurance-related embedded derivatives (4)
Other liabilities - ceded MRBs (3)
Total, net
184
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Items
Included
in
Net
Income
Gains
(Losses)
in
OCI
and
Other (1)
Issuances,
Sales,
Maturities,
Settlements,
Calls,
Net
Transfers
Into or
Out
of
Level 3,
Net
Ending
Fair
Value
Beginning
Fair
Value
$
5,720 $
–
41
4
–
870
1 $
–
–
–
–
–
(1,550) $
(1)
(6)
1
–
(113)
93
828
95
739
21
95
528
(6)
(80)
54
(20)
2
(83)
(215)
(22)
–
–
(5)
(6)
–
–
796 $
–
(30)
21
17
676
(12)
(152)
19
(227)
–
–
212
(2,672) $
36
(5)
(25)
(17)
(316)
(4)
(15)
(15)
–
(15)
–
–
2,295
35
–
1
–
1,117
49
581
153
487
2
12
525
(6,131)
(17)
2,886 $
1,975
(188)
1,440 $
–
–
(1,702) $
$
(627)
–
693 $
–
–
(3,048) $
(4,783)
(205)
269
Investments: (2)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs (3)
Indexed annuity ceded embedded
derivatives (4)
Policyholder account balances – indexed
annuity and IUL contracts embedded
derivatives (4)
Other liabilities – ceded MRBs (3)
Total, net
185
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Items
Included
in
Net
Income
Gains
(Losses)
in
OCI
and
Other (1)
Issuances,
Sales,
Maturities,
Settlements,
Calls,
Net
Transfers
Into or
Out
of
Level 3,
Net
Ending
Fair
Value
Beginning
Fair
Value
$
5,121 $
5
74
2
–
570
4 $
–
–
(1)
–
1
(182) $
–
(11)
–
–
(9)
104
644
59
832
1,542
336
550
–
(3)
39
11
1,255
(241)
87
27
–
–
5
(3)
–
–
748 $
(5)
80
3
8
602
(38)
210
(3)
(109)
(139)
–
(109)
29 $
–
(102)
–
(8)
(294)
–
(23)
–
–
(2,634)
–
–
5,720
–
41
4
–
870
93
828
95
739
21
95
528
(3,594)
–
6,245 $
(2,709)
(17)
(1,574) $
$
–
–
(173) $
172
–
1,420 $
–
–
(3,032) $
(6,131)
(17)
2,886
Investments: (2)
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other assets:
Ceded MRBs (3)
Indexed annuity ceded embedded
derivatives (4)
Policyholder account balances – indexed
annuity and IUL contracts embedded
derivatives (4)
Other liabilities – ceded MRBs (3)
Total, net
(1) The changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps are offset by an adjustment to derivative investments (see Note 6).
(2) Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts are included in net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Gains (losses) from sales, maturities, settlements and calls and credit loss expense are included in
realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(3) Gains (losses) from the changes in fair value are included in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(4) Gains (losses) from the changes in fair value are included in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
186
The following provides the components of the items included in issuances, sales, maturities, settlements and calls, net, (in millions) as
reported above:
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives
Policyholder account balances –
RILA, fixed annuity and IUL
contracts
Total, net
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives
Policyholder account balances – indexed
annuity and IUL contracts embedded
derivatives
Total, net
Issuances
Sales
Maturities
Settlements
Calls
Total
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
$
797 $
–
5
–
971
–
–
1
5
19
(149) $
(30)
–
–
(2)
–
(231)
(99)
–
–
404
–
(34) $
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(3)
–
(409) $
–
–
(4)
(230)
–
(82)
–
(202)
–
(11) $
–
–
–
(6)
(2)
–
–
–
–
194
(30)
5
(4)
733
(2)
(313)
(98)
(197)
16
5
–
409
(1,110)
1,092 $
$
–
(511) $
–
(37) $
9
(913) $
–
(19) $
(1,101)
(388)
Issuances
Sales
Maturities
Settlements
Calls
Total
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
$
1,263 $
–
21
17
918
–
287
28
15
124
(100) $
–
–
–
–
–
(229)
(9)
–
–
(82) $
(30)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(235) $
–
–
–
(235)
–
(210)
–
(242)
(50) $
–
–
–
(7)
(12)
–
–
–
796
(30)
21
17
676
(12)
(152)
19
(227)
88
–
212
(710)
1,963 $
–
(338) $
–
(112) $
83
(751) $
$
–
(69) $
(627)
693
187
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Derivative investments
Other assets – indexed annuity ceded
embedded derivatives
Policyholder account balances – indexed
annuity and IUL contracts embedded
derivatives
Total, net
Issuances
Sales
Maturities
Settlements
Calls
Total
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
$
1,408 $
–
80
3
8
835
12
383
7
96
174
55
(33) $
–
–
–
–
–
(20)
(24)
(10)
(101)
(124)
(109) $
(5)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(26)
(189)
(488) $
–
–
–
–
(233)
–
(149)
–
(78)
–
(30) $
–
–
–
–
–
(30)
–
–
–
–
748
(5)
80
3
8
602
(38)
210
(3)
(109)
(139)
–
–
(164)
–
(109)
(400)
2,661 $
–
(312) $
–
(329) $
572
(540) $
$
–
(60) $
172
1,420
The following summarizes changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income related to financial instruments carried at fair value
classified within Level 3 that we still held (in millions):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
2021
Trading securities (1)
Equity securities (1)
Mortgage loans on real estate (1)
Derivative investments (1)
MRBs (2)
Funds withheld reinsurance liabilities –
$
8 $
(16)
(8)
1
2,200
(81) $
56
(20)
2
3,183
4
43
12
1,051
3,729
reinsurance-related embedded derivatives (1)
(789)
–
–
Embedded derivatives – indexed annuity
and IUL contracts (1)
Total, net
(20)
1,376 $
(95)
3,045 $
44
4,883
$
(1) Included in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(2) Included in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
188
The following summarizes changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in OCI, net of tax, related to financial instruments carried at fair
value classified within Level 3 that we still held (in millions):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
2021
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred
securities
Mortgage loans on real estate
Total, net
$
$
(5) $
3
–
3
(1)
4
4 $
(1,562) $
(1)
(7)
(116)
(22)
(5)
(1,713) $
(183)
–
(10)
(9)
27
4
(171)
͏
The following provides the components of the transfers into and out of Level 3 (in millions) as reported above:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Transfers
Transfers
Out of
Into
Level 3
Level 3
Total
$
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Derivative investments
Total, net
$
195 $
12
12
2
16
6
6
31
280 $
(206) $
(5)
–
(377)
(13)
(7)
–
–
(608) $
(11)
7
12
(375)
3
(1)
6
31
(328)
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal bonds
Foreign government bonds
RMBS
CMBS
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Trading securities
Equity securities
Derivative investments
Total, net
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Transfers
Transfers
Out of
Into
Level 3
Level 3
Total
$
$
296 $
36
–
–
–
16
–
4
–
–
352 $
(2,968) $
–
(5)
(25)
(17)
(332)
(4)
(19)
(15)
(15)
(3,400) $
(2,672)
36
(5)
(25)
(17)
(316)
(4)
(15)
(15)
(15)
(3,048)
189
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS securities:
Corporate bonds
Foreign government bonds
CMBS
ABS
Trading securities
Derivative investments
Total, net
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Transfers
Transfers
Out of
Into
Level 3
Level 3
Total
$
$
163 $
–
–
36
14
24
237 $
(134) $
(102)
(8)
(330)
(37)
(2,658)
(3,269) $
29
(102)
(8)
(294)
(23)
(2,634)
(3,032)
Transfers into and out of Level 3 are generally the result of observable market information on financial instruments no longer being
available or becoming available to our pricing vendors. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, transfers in and out of
Level 3 were attributable primarily to the financial instruments’ observable market information no longer being available or becoming
available. In 2022, transfers out of Level 3 included corporate bonds and ABS for which we changed valuation techniques. This change
in valuation technique was primarily from a change to a third-party-provided pricing model that did not use significant unobservable
inputs. In 2021, transfers out of Level 3 included derivative instruments for which we changed valuation techniques. This change in
valuation technique was primarily from unobservable inputs in counterparty models to a mathematical model provided by a third party.
These updated valuation techniques are considered industry standard and provide us with greater visibility into the economic valuation
inputs.
190
The following summarizes the fair value (in millions), valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs of the Level 3 fair value
measurements as of December 31, 2023:
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Assumption or
Input Ranges
Weighted
Average
Input
Range (1)
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS
and trading securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal
bonds
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities
Equity securities
2.1 %
1.8 %
1.5 %
4.5 %
(10)
94 %
(10)
(10)
1.78 %
(10)
$
186 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
(0.2) % –
3.7 %
2.1 %
5 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
12 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
0.9 % –
1.8 % –
2.2 %
1.8 %
7 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
5 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
1.4 % –
4.5 % –
1.5 %
4.5 %
MRB assets
Other assets – ceded MRBs
3,894
2 Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Utilization of GLB withdrawals (4)
Claims utilization factor (5)
Premiums utilization factor (5)
Non-performance risk (6)
Mortality (7)
Volatility (8)
1.0 % –
85 % –
60 % –
80 % –
0.51 % –
30 %
100 %
100 %
115 %
2.13 %
(9)
1 % –
29 %
13.92 %
Other assets – indexed
annuity ceded embedded
derivatives
Liabilities
Policyholder account
balances – indexed annuity
contracts embedded
derivatives
MRB liabilities
Other liabilities – ceded
MRBs
940 Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Mortality (7)
0% –
9 %
(9)
(10)
(10)
0% –
9 %
(9)
1 % –
85 % –
60 % –
80 % –
0.51 % –
30 %
100 %
100 %
115 %
2.13 %
(9)
(10)
(10)
(10)
94 %
(10)
(10)
1.78 %
(10)
1 % –
29 %
13.92 %
$ (9,013) Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Mortality (7)
(1,716)
(239) Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Utilization of GLB withdrawals (4)
Claims utilization factor (5)
Premiums utilization factor (5)
Non-performance risk (6)
Mortality (7)
Volatility (8)
191
The following summarizes the fair value (in millions), valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs of the Level 3 fair value
measurements as of December 31, 2022:
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Assumption or
Input Ranges
Weighted
Average
Input
Range (1)
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity AFS and
trading securities:
Corporate bonds
State and municipal
bonds
ABS
Hybrid and redeemable
preferred securities
Equity securities
2.3 %
1.4 %
1.5 %
4.5 %
(10)
94 %
(10)
(10)
1.73 %
(10)
$
204 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
(0.2) % –
4.2%
2.1 %
35 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
15 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
1.2 % –
1.4 % –
2.4 %
1.4%
3 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
4 Discounted cash flow Liquidity/duration adjustment (2)
1.5 % –
4.5 % –
1.5%
4.5%
MRB assets
Other assets – ceded MRBs
2,807
12 Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Utilization of GLB withdrawals (4)
Claims utilization factor (5)
Premiums utilization factor (5)
Non-performance risk (6)
Mortality (7)
Volatility (8)
1.0 % –
85 % –
60 % –
80 % –
30%
100%
100%
115%
0.35 % – 2.41%
(9)
1 % –
28%
14.47 %
Other assets – indexed
annuity ceded embedded
derivatives
Liabilities
Policyholder account
balances – indexed annuity
contracts embedded
derivatives
525 Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Mortality (7)
0 % –
9%
(9)
(10)
(10)
$ (4,845) ) Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Mortality (7)
0 % –
9%
(9)
(10)
(10)
MRB liabilities
Other liabilities – ceded
MRBs
(2,078) )
(205) ) Discounted cash flow Lapse (3)
Utilization of GLB withdrawals (4)
Claims utilization factor (5)
Premiums utilization factor (5)
Non-performance risk (6)
Mortality (7)
Volatility (8)
1 % –
85 % –
60 % –
80 % –
0.35 % –
30%
100%
100%
115%
2.41 %
(9)
(10)
94 %
(10)
(10)
1.73 %
(10)
1 % –
28%
14.47 %
(1) Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instruments, unless otherwise noted.
(2) The liquidity/duration adjustment input represents an estimated market participant composite of adjustments attributable to liquidity
premiums, expected durations, structures and credit quality that would be applied to the market observable information of an
investment.
192
(3) The lapse input represents the estimated probability of a contract surrendering during a year, and thereby forgoing any future benefits.
The range for indexed annuity contracts represents the lapses during the surrender charge period.
(4) The utilization of GLB withdrawals input represents the estimated percentage of policyholders that utilize the GLB withdrawal riders.
(5) The utilization factors are applied to the present value of claims or premiums, as appropriate, in the MRB calculation to estimate the
impact of inefficient GLB withdrawal behavior, including taking less than or more than the maximum GLB withdrawal.
(6) The non-performance risk input represents the estimated additional credit spread that market participants would apply to the market
observable discount rate when pricing a contract. The non-performance risk input was weighted by the absolute value of the
sensitivity of the reserve to the non-performance risk assumption.
(7) The mortality input represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according
to age or some other factor such as gender, will die.
(8) The volatility input represents overall volatilities assumed for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a mixture of equity
and fixed-income assets. Volatility assumptions vary by fund due to the benchmarking of different indices. The volatility input was
weighted by the relative account balance assigned to each index.
(9) The mortality is based on a combination of company and industry experience, adjusted for improvement factors.
(10) A weighted average input range is not a meaningful measurement for lapse, utilization factors or mortality.
From the table above, we have excluded Level 3 fair value measurements obtained from independent, third-party pricing sources. We do
not develop the significant inputs used to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities, and the information regarding the
significant inputs is not readily available to us. Independent broker-quoted fair values are non-binding quotes developed by market
makers or broker-dealers obtained from third-party sources recognized as market participants. The fair value of a broker-quoted asset or
liability is based solely on the receipt of an updated quote from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market
participant as we do not adjust broker quotes when used as the fair value measurement for an asset or liability. Significant increases or
decreases in any of the quotes received from a third-party broker-dealer may result in a significantly higher or lower fair value
measurement.
The embedded derivative liability associated with Fortitude Re was excluded from the above table. As discussed in Note 8, this
embedded derivative liability was created through a coinsurance with funds withheld reinsurance agreement where the investments
supporting the reinsurance agreement were withheld by and continue to be reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. This
reinsurance-related embedded derivative is valued as a total return swap with reference to the fair value of the investments held by us.
Accordingly, the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation of the reinsurance-related embedded derivative are a component of the
investments supporting the reinsurance agreement that are reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Changes in any of the significant inputs presented in the table above would have resulted in a significant change in the fair value
measurement of the asset or liability as follows:
•
•
Investments – An increase in the liquidity/duration adjustment input would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value measurement.
Indexed annuity contracts embedded derivatives – For direct embedded derivatives, an increase in the lapse or mortality inputs would have
resulted in a decrease in the fair value measurement.
• MRBs – Assuming our MRBs are in a liability position: an increase in our lapse, non-performance risk or mortality inputs would have
resulted in a decrease in the fair value measurement, except for policies with GDB riders only, in which case an increase in mortality
inputs would have resulted in an increase in the fair value measurement.
For each category discussed above, the unobservable inputs are not inter-related; therefore, a directional change in one input would not
have affected the other inputs.
As part of our ongoing valuation process, we assess the reasonableness of our valuation techniques or models and make adjustments as
necessary. For more information, see Note 1.
16. Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We maintain U.S. defined benefit pension plans in which certain U.S. employees and agents are participants, and a U.K. plan we retained
after the sale of the Lincoln UK business. Our defined benefit pension plans are closed to new entrants and existing participants do not
accrue any additional benefits. We comply with the minimum funding requirements in both the U.S. and the U.K. In accordance with
such practice, we were not required to make contributions for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. We do not expect to be
required to make any contributions to these pension plans in 2024. We sponsor other postretirement benefit plans that provide health
care and life insurance to certain retired employees and agents. Total net periodic cost (recovery) for these plans was $10 million,
$(41) million and $(41) million during 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which was reported within commissions and other expenses on
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). In 2024, we expect the plans to make benefit payments of approximately
$100 million.
193
Information (in millions) with respect to these plans was as follows:
Fair value of plan assets
Projected benefit obligation
Funded status
Amounts Recognized on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Other assets
Other liabilities
Net amount recognized
Weighted-Average Assumptions
Benefit obligations:
Weighted-average discount rate
Net periodic benefit cost:
Weighted-average discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
As of or For the Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2023
2022
Pension Plans
1,125 $
1,131
(6) $
1,126 $
1,126
– $
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
76 $
42
34 $
71
44
27
80 $
(86)
(6) $
91 $
(91)
– $
34 $
–
34 $
27
–
27
$
$
$
$
5.11 %
5.49 %
5.45 %
5.70 %
5.46 %
6.25 %
2.81 %
5.67 %
5.70 %
6.50 %
3.73 %
6.50 %
The weighted average discount rate was determined based on a corporate yield curve as of December 31, 2023, and projected benefit
obligation cash flows. The expected return on plan assets was determined based on historical and expected future returns of the various
asset categories, using the plans’ target plan allocation. We reevaluate these assumptions each plan year.
The following summarizes our fair value measurements of our benefit plans’ assets (in millions) on a recurring basis by asset category:
Fixed maturity securities:
Corporate bonds
U.S. government bonds
Foreign government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Limited partnerships and common and
preferred stock
Bulk annuity insurance policy
Cash and invested cash
Other investments
Total
Defined Contribution Plans
As of December 31,
2022
2023
$
$
229 $
257
1
20
331
250
37
76
1,201 $
292
196
128
22
353
89
46
71
1,197
We sponsor tax-qualified defined contribution plans for eligible employees and agents. We administer these plans in accordance with the
plan documents and various limitations under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. For the years ended December 31,
2023, 2022 and 2021, expenses for these plans were $116 million, $102 million and $107 million, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plans
We sponsor non-qualified, unfunded, deferred compensation plans for certain current and former employees, agents and non-employee
directors. The results of certain notional investment options within some of the plans are hedged by total return swaps. Our expenses
increase or decrease in direct proportion to the change in market value of the participants’ investment options. Participants of certain
194
plans are able to select our stock as a notional investment option; however, it is not hedged by the total return swaps and is a primary
source of expense volatility related to these plans. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, expenses for these plans were
$24 million, $(4) million and $32 million, respectively. For further discussion of total return swaps related to our deferred compensation
plans, see Note 6.
Information (in millions) with respect to these plans was as follows:
Total liabilities (1)
Investments dedicated to fund liabilities (2)
$
736 $
233
686
206
As of December 31,
2022
2023
(1) Reported in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
17. Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans
We sponsor stock-based incentive compensation plans for our employees and directors and for the employees and agents of our
subsidiaries that provide for the issuance of stock options, performance shares and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), among other types of
awards. We issue new shares to satisfy option exercises and vested performance shares and RSUs.
Total compensation expense (in millions) by award type for our stock-based incentive compensation plans was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
2021
Stock options
Performance shares
RSUs
Total
Recognized tax benefit
$
$
$
8 $
12
41
61 $
6 $
10
35
51 $
9 $
11 $
8
18
35
61
13
Total unrecognized compensation expense (in millions) and expected weighted-average life (in years) by award type for our stock-based
incentive compensation plans was as follows:
2023
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
Weighted-
Average
Period
Weighted-
Average
Period
Weighted-
Average
Period
Expense
Expense
Expense
Stock options
Performance shares
RSUs
Total unrecognized stock-based
incentive compensation expense
$
$
9
21
54
84
0.8 $
1.3
1.6
$
11
19
55
85
0.8 $
1.2
1.4
$
8
14
43
65
0.7
1.2
1.4
195
Stock Options
The option price assumptions used for our stock option awards were as follows:
Weighted-average fair value per option granted
Weighted-average assumptions:
Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate (1)
Expected life (in years)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
11.64
$
18.13 $
17.26
4.1 %
48.1 %
3.8-4.1%
5.8
3.2%
44.4%
1.9-3.8%
5.8
3.0%
45.0%
0.6-1.0%
5.8
(1) Risk-free interest rate expressed as a range and not a weighted average.
The fair value of options is determined using a Black-Scholes options valuation model with the assumptions disclosed in the table above.
The dividend yield is based on the expected dividend rate during the expected life of the option. Expected volatility is based on the
implied volatility of exchange-traded securities and the historical volatility of the LNC stock price. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected life of the options granted represents the weighted-average
period of time from the grant date to the date of exercise, expiration or cancellation based upon historical behavior.
Generally, stock options have a maximum contractual term of ten years and vest ratably over a three-year period based solely on a service
condition. Information with respect to our incentive plans involving stock options with service conditions (aggregate intrinsic value
shown in millions) was as follows:
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023
Shares
3,396,539 $
687,027
(7,170)
(199,418)
3,876,978 $
58.36
33.90
29.54
54.14
54.30
5.71 $
Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2023 (1)
3,725,100 $
54.65
5.59 $
Exercisable as of December 31, 2023
2,752,896 $
59.57
4.44 $
(1) Includes estimated forfeitures.
–
–
–
The total fair value of stock options with service conditions that vested during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was
$6 million, $8 million and $8 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of such options exercised during the years ended December
31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was less than $1 million, $1 million and $15 million, respectively.
196
We award to certain agents stock options that have a maximum contractual term of five years and generally vest ratably over a two-year
period depending on the satisfaction of the performance conditions. Information with respect to our incentive plans involving stock
options with performance conditions (aggregate intrinsic value shown in millions) was as follows:
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022
Granted
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023
Shares
121,397 $
24,496
(33,356)
112,537 $
57.55
25.66
73.99
45.73
2.36 $
Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2023 (1)
107,553 $
45.92
2.30 $
Exercisable as of December 31, 2023
95,924 $
46.41
2.12 $
(1) Includes estimated forfeitures.
–
–
–
The total fair value of stock options with performance conditions that vested during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021,
was less than $1 million, $1 million and less than $1 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of such options exercised during the
years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was less than $1 million, less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively.
Performance Shares
LNC performance shares vest, if at all, after the conclusion of the three-year performance period and certification of performance results
by the Compensation Committee, and, generally, on the third anniversary of the grant date. Depending on the achievement level of
performance measures pre-determined by the Compensation Committee for the three-year performance period, payouts could range from
0% to 200% of the target award for performance shares granted prior to 2021, 0% to 240% of the target award for performance shares
granted in 2021 and 0% to 232% of the target award for performance shares granted in 2022 and 2023. Dividend equivalents accrue with
respect to unvested performance shares when and as cash dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock and vest if and to the
extent that the underlying performance shares vest. Performance share information in the table below includes dividend equivalents
credited on unvested performance share awards at target. Information with respect to our performance shares was as follows:
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022 (1)
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Performance adjustment (2)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023 (1)
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares
767,428 $
692,803
–
(79,253)
(188,570)
1,192,408 $
64.61
38.36
–
54.00
64.62
50.06
(1) Represents target award amounts.
(2) Represents the difference between the target shares granted and the actual shares vested based upon the achievement level of
performance measures.
197
RSUs
LNC RSUs generally cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, based solely on a service condition. Dividend equivalents accrue
with respect to unvested RSUs when and as cash dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock and vest if and when the
underlying RSUs vest. RSU information in the table below includes dividend equivalents credited on unvested RSU awards. Information
with respect to our RSUs was as follows:
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares
1,939,149 $
1,828,881
(669,674)
(179,038)
2,919,318 $
61.26
32.91
62.00
49.96
44.00
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023
18. Contingencies and Commitments
Contingencies
Reinsurance Disputes
Certain reinsurers have sought rate increases on certain yearly renewable term agreements. We are disputing the requested rate increases
under these agreements. We may initiate legal proceedings, as necessary, under these agreements in order to protect our contractual
rights. Additionally, reinsurers have initiated, and may in the future initiate, legal proceedings against us. While this may impact the Life
Insurance segment, we believe it is unlikely the outcome of these disputes would have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Regulatory and Litigation Matters
Regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other regulatory bodies
regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws,
securities laws, laws governing the activities of broker-dealers, registered investment advisers and unclaimed property laws.
LNC is involved in various pending or threatened legal or regulatory proceedings, including purported class actions, arising from the
conduct of business both in the ordinary course and otherwise. In some of the matters, very large and/or indeterminate amounts,
including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of
monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit
claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may
permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding verdicts obtained in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This
variability in pleadings, together with the actual experiences of LNC in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an
extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little
relevance to its merits or disposition value.
Due to the unpredictable nature of litigation, the outcome of a litigation matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular
points in time is normally difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the
credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how trial and appellate courts will apply the law in the context of the pleadings or
evidence presented, whether by motion practice, or at trial or on appeal. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how
opposing parties and their counsel will themselves view the relevant evidence and applicable law.
We establish liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when information related to the loss contingencies shows both that
it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. It is possible that some matters could
require us to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated as of December 31,
2023.
For some matters, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters in which a loss is probable, an
accrual has been made. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made.
Accordingly, the estimate contained in this paragraph reflects two types of matters. For some matters included within this estimate, an
accrual has been made, but there is a reasonable possibility that an exposure exists in excess of the amount accrued. In these cases, the
198
estimate reflects the reasonably possible range of loss in excess of the accrued amount. For other matters included within this estimation,
no accrual has been made because a loss, while potentially estimable, is believed to be reasonably possible but not probable. In these
cases, the estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. As of December 31, 2023, we estimate the aggregate range of
reasonably possible losses, including amounts in excess of amounts accrued for these matters as of such date, to be up to approximately
$190 million, after-tax. Any estimate is not an indication of expected loss, if any, or of the Company’s maximum possible loss exposure
on such matters.
For other matters, we are not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. We are often unable to estimate the
possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the
range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual
allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts and the progress of settlement negotiations. On a quarterly
and annual basis, we review relevant information with respect to litigation contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and
estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews.
Among other matters, we are presently engaged in litigation, including relating to cost of insurance rates (“Cost of Insurance and Other
Litigation”), as described below. No accrual has been made for some of these matters. Although a loss is believed to be reasonably
possible for these matters, for some of these matters, we are not able to estimate a reasonably possible amount or range of potential
liability. An adverse outcome in one or more of these matters may have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, but,
based on information currently known, management does not believe those cases are likely to have such an impact.
Cost of Insurance and Other Litigation
Cost of Insurance Litigation
Glover v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Connecticut, No. 3:16-cv-00827, is a putative class action that was served on The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
(“LNL”) on June 8, 2016. Plaintiff is the owner of a universal life insurance policy who alleges that LNL charged more for non-
guaranteed cost of insurance than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all universal life and variable universal life
policyholders who owned policies containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions that are similar to those of plaintiff’s policy and
seeks damages on behalf of all such policyholders. On January 11, 2019, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. In
response, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint, which, on September 25, 2023, the court granted in part and denied in
part. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 10, 2023. We are vigorously defending this matter.
EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch, et al. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:17-cv-02592, is a civil action filed on February 1, 2017. Plaintiffs own universal life insurance policies
originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Among other things, plaintiffs allege that LNL breached the terms of policyholders’
contracts when it increased non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates beginning in 2016. We are vigorously defending this matter.
In re: Lincoln National COI Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:16-cv-06605-
GJP, is a consolidated litigation matter related to multiple putative class action cases that were consolidated by an order dated March 20,
2017. Plaintiffs purport to own certain universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Among other
things, plaintiffs allege that LNL and LNC breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts by increasing non-guaranteed cost of insurance
rates beginning in 2016. Plaintiffs sought to represent classes of policyowners and sought damages on their behalf. On August 9, 2022,
the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The parties participated in a mediation on December 13, 2022, and subsequently
reached a settlement. On January 26, 2023, the parties informed the presiding judge of a class settlement in this action, subject to final
documentation and court approval. On March 24, 2023, plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement, which
was granted by the court on June 14, 2023. The provisional settlement, which was subject to both preliminary and final approval of the
court, consisted of $117.75 million in pre-tax cash (in the aggregate for both this litigation and the In re: Lincoln National 2017 COI Rate
Litigation matter discussed immediately below) and a five-year cost of insurance rate freeze, among other terms. After certain
policyholders timely opted out or otherwise excluded themselves from the settlement class with respect to certain policies, the pre-tax
cash settlement fund was reduced to $109.96 million. The court granted final approval of the settlement on October 5, 2023. On
December 27, 2023, the court ordered that supplemental notice of the class settlement be mailed to a small percentage of settlement class
members who had not been sent the initial class notice. Those policyholders own policies representing less than 0.14% of the total of all
Policy Claim Amounts (as defined in the parties’ settlement agreement) and have until 45 days after the completion of supplemental
notice to object to or opt out of the settlement. Certain of the policyholders who did not participate in the settlement are plaintiffs in
Brighton Trustees, LLC, et al. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Ryan K. Crayne, on behalf of and a trustee for Carlton Peak Trust v.
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company discussed further below. The remaining policyholders who are not participants in the
settlement may bring individual actions in the future to the extent they have not already done so.
199
In re: Lincoln National 2017 COI Rate Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:17-
cv-04150, is a consolidated litigation matter related to multiple putative class action cases that were consolidated by an order dated March
28, 2018. Plaintiffs purport to own certain universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Among other
things, plaintiffs allege that LNL and LNC breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts by increasing non-guaranteed cost of insurance
rates beginning in 2017. Plaintiffs sought to represent classes of policyholders and sought damages on their behalf. On August 9, 2022,
the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The parties participated in a mediation on December 13, 2022, and subsequently
reached a settlement. On January 26, 2023, the parties informed the presiding judge of a class settlement in this action, subject to final
documentation and court approval. On March 24, 2023, plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement, which
was granted by the court on June 14, 2023. The provisional settlement, which was subject to both preliminary and final approval of the
court, consists of $117.75 million in pre-tax cash (in the aggregate for both this litigation and the In re: Lincoln National COI Litigation
matter discussed immediately above) and a five-year cost of insurance rate freeze, among other terms. After certain policyholders timely
opted out or otherwise excluded themselves from the settlement class with respect to certain policies, the pre-tax cash settlement fund
was reduced to $109.96 million. The court granted final approval of the settlement on October 5, 2023. On December 27, 2023, the
court ordered that supplemental notice of the class settlement be mailed to a small percentage of settlement class members who had not
been sent the initial class notice. Those policyholders own policies representing less than 0.14% of the total of all Policy Claim Amounts
(as defined in the parties’ settlement agreement) and have until 45 days after the completion of supplemental notice to object to or opt
out of the settlement. Certain of the policyholders who did not participate in the settlement are plaintiffs in Brighton Trustees, LLC, et al. v.
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Ryan K. Crayne, on behalf of and a trustee for Carlton Peak Trust v. The Lincoln National Life
Insurance Company discussed further below. The remaining policyholders who are not participants in the settlement may bring individual
actions in the future to the extent they have not already done so.
Iwanski v. First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company (“FPP”), No. 2:18-cv-01573 filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania is a putative class action that was filed on April 13, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that defendant FPP breached the terms of his life
insurance policy by deducting non-guaranteed cost of insurance charges in excess of what is permitted by the policies. Plaintiff seeks to
represent all owners of universal life insurance policies issued by FPP containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance provisions that are
similar to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on their behalf. Breach of contract is the only cause of action asserted. We are
vigorously defending this matter.
TVPX ARS INC., as Securities Intermediary for Consolidated Wealth Management, LTD. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:18-cv-02989, is a putative class action that was filed on July 17, 2018.
Plaintiff alleges that LNL charged more for non-guaranteed cost of insurance than permitted by the policy. Plaintiff seeks to represent all
universal life and variable universal life policyholders who own policies issued by LNL or its predecessors containing non-guaranteed cost
of insurance provisions that are similar to those of Plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on behalf of all such policyholders. We are
vigorously defending this matter.
LSH Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as securities intermediary for LSH Co. v. Lincoln National Corporation and The Lincoln National
Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:18-cv-05529, is a civil action filed
on December 21, 2018. Plaintiffs own universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Among other
things, plaintiffs allege that LNL and LNC breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts when LNL increased non-guaranteed cost of
insurance rates in 2016 and 2017. We are vigorously defending this matter.
Vida Longevity Fund, LP v. Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York, No. 1:19-cv-06004, is a putative class action that was filed on June 27, 2019. Plaintiff alleges that Lincoln Life & Annuity Company
of New York (“LLANY”) charged more for non-guaranteed cost of insurance than was permitted by the policies. On March 31, 2022,
the court issued an order granting plaintiff’s motion for class certification and certified a class of all current or former owners of six
universal life insurance products issued by LLANY that were assessed a cost of insurance charge any time on or after June 27, 2013.
Plaintiff seeks damages on behalf of the class. On April 19, 2023, LLANY filed a motion for summary judgment, which remains pending.
We are vigorously defending this matter.
Angus v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:22-
cv-01878, is a putative class action filed on May 13, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that defendant LNL breached the terms of her life insurance
policy by deducting non-guaranteed cost of insurance charges in excess of what is permitted by the policies. Plaintiff seeks to represent
all owners of universal life insurance policies issued or insured by LNL or its predecessors containing non-guaranteed cost of insurance
provisions that are similar to those of plaintiff’s policy and seeks damages on their behalf. Breach of contract is the only cause of action
asserted. On August 26, 2022, LNL filed a motion to dismiss. We are vigorously defending this matter.
Brighton Trustees, LLC, et al. v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:23-cv-02251, is a civil action filed on April 20, 2023. On June 12, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Indiana granted a motion filed by LNL to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs purport to own universal life insurance policies originally issued by Jefferson-Pilot (now LNL). Among other
200
things, plaintiffs allege that LNL breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts and converted property when it increased non-guaranteed
cost of insurance rates beginning in 2016. We are vigorously defending this matter.
Ryan K. Crayne, on behalf of and as trustee for Carlton Peak Trust v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, pending in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:24-cv-00053-GJP, is a civil action filed on November 17, 2023. On January 4, 2024,
upon the parties’ stipulation, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana transferred the case to the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff purports to own claims regarding universal life policies originally issued by Jefferson-
Pilot (now LNL). Among other things, plaintiff alleges that LNL breached the terms of policyholders’ contracts and converted property
when it increased non-guaranteed cost of insurance rates beginning in 2016. We are vigorously defending this matter.
Other Litigation
Andrew Nitkewicz v. Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,
No. 1:20-cv-06805, is a putative class action that was filed on August 24, 2020. Plaintiff Andrew Nitkewicz, as trustee of the Joan C.
Lupe Trust, seeks to represent all current and former owners of universal life (including variable universal life) policies who own or
owned policies issued by LLANY and its predecessors in interest that were in force at any time on or after June 27, 2013, and for which
planned annual, semi-annual, or quarterly premiums were paid for any period beyond the end of the policy month of the insured’s death.
Plaintiff alleges LLANY failed to refund unearned premium in violation of New York Insurance Law Section 3203(a)(2) in connection
with the payment of death benefit claims for certain insurance policies. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages and pre-judgment interest
on behalf of the various classes and sub-class. On July 2, 2021, the court granted, with prejudice, LLANY’s November 2020 motion to
dismiss this matter. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on July 28, 2021, and on September 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit reserved its decision and certified a question to the New York Court of Appeals. On October 20, 2022, the New York
Court of Appeals accepted the question. On October 19, 2023, the New York Court of Appeals answered the question in LLANY’s
favor and transmitted the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Plaintiff sought, and was granted, supplemental
briefing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to certain aspects of the New York Court of Appeals’
decision. The supplemental briefing was completed January 23, 2024. We are vigorously defending this matter.
Henry Morgan et al. v. Lincoln National Corporation d/b/a Lincoln Financial Group, et al, filed in the District Court of the 14th Judicial District of
Dallas County, Texas, No. DC-23-02492, is a putative class action that was filed on February 22, 2023. Plaintiffs Henry Morgan, Susan
Smith, Charles Smith, Laura Seale, Terri Cogburn, Laura Baesel, Kathleen Walton, Terry Warner, and Toni Hale (“Plaintiffs”) allege on
behalf of a putative class that Lincoln National Corporation d/b/a Lincoln Financial Group, LNL and LLANY (together, “Lincoln”),
FMR, LLC, and Fidelity Product Services, LLC (“Fidelity”) created and marketed misleading and deceptive insurance products with
attributes of investment products. The putative class comprises all individuals and entities who purchased Lincoln OptiBlend products
that allocated account monies to the 1-Year Fidelity AIM Dividend Participation Account, between January 1, 2020, to December 31,
2022. Plaintiffs assert the following claims individually and on behalf of the class, (1) violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices
Act against Lincoln; (2) common-law fraud against Lincoln; (3) negligent misrepresentation against Lincoln and Fidelity; and (4) aiding
and abetting fraud against Fidelity. Plaintiffs allege they suffered damages from “a missed investment return of approximately 5-6%” and
mitigation damages. They seek actual, consequential and punitive damages, as well as pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorney’s
fees, and litigation costs. On March 31, 2023, the Lincoln defendants filed a notice of removal removing the action from the 14th Judicial
District of Dallas County, Texas, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. On May 8,
2023, the Lincoln defendants and the Fidelity defendants filed motions to dismiss, which remain pending. We are vigorously defending
this matter.
201
Commitments
Leases
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had operating lease ROU assets of $118 million and $140 million, respectively, and associated
lease liabilities of $129 million and $152 million, respectively. The weighted-average discount rate was 4.4% and 3.3%, respectively, and
the weighted-average remaining lease term was four years and five years, respectively, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Operating lease
expense for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, was $42 million, $45 million and $49 million, respectively, and reported
in commissions and other expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had finance lease assets of $5 million and $14 million, respectively, and associated finance lease
liabilities of $27 million and $106 million, respectively. The accumulated amortization associated with the finance lease assets was
$467 million and $458 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. These assets will continue to be amortized on a straight-
line basis over the assets’ remaining lives. The weighted-average discount rate was 6.4% and 2.9%, respectively, and the weighted-average
remaining lease term was two years and one year, respectively, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Finance lease expense (in millions) was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Amortization of finance lease assets (1)
Interest on finance lease liabilities (2)
Total
$
$
9 $
5
14 $
23 $
4
27 $
38
3
41
(1) Amortization of finance lease assets is reported in commissions and other expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss).
(2) Interest on finance lease liabilities is reported in interest and debt expense on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
The table below presents cash flow information (in millions) related to leases:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases
Financing cash flows from finance leases
Supplemental Non-Cash Information
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new lease obligations:
Operating leases
$
$
42 $
83
47 $
74
– $
23 $
47
62
8
Our future minimum lease payments (in millions) under non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
Total future minimum lease payments
Less: Amount representing interest
Present value of minimum lease payments
Operating Leases
$
Finance Leases
43 $
35
31
24
20
9
162
33
129 $
18
7
4
–
–
–
29
2
27
$
202
As of December 31, 2023, we had no leases that had not yet commenced.
Certain Financing Arrangements
We periodically enter into sale-leaseback arrangements that do not meet the criteria of a sale for accounting purposes. As such, we
account for these transactions as financing arrangements. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had $595 million and $558 million,
respectively, of financing obligations reported within other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Future payments due on certain
financing arrangements (in millions) as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Thereafter
Total future minimum lease payments
Less: Amount representing interest
Present value of minimum lease payments
Vulnerability from Concentrations
$
$
152
172
224
127
10
6
691
96
595
As of December 31, 2023, we did not have a concentration of: business transactions with a particular customer or lender; sources of
supply of labor or services used in the business; or a market or geographic area in which business is conducted that makes us vulnerable
to an event that is at least reasonably possible to occur in the near term and which could cause a severe impact to our financial condition.
For information on our investment and reinsurance concentrations, see Notes 4 and 8, respectively.
Other Contingency Matters
State guaranty funds assess insurance companies to cover losses to contract holders of insolvent or rehabilitated companies. Mandatory
assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states. We have accrued for expected
assessments and the related reductions in future state premium taxes, which net to assessments (recoveries) of less than $1 million and
$(2) million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
203
19. Shares and Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Shares
Preferred stock authorized, issued and outstanding (number of shares) was as follows:
As of December 31,
Shares
Authorized
2023
Shares
Issued
Shares
Outstanding
Shares
Authorized
2022
Shares
Issued
Shares
Outstanding
9.250% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative
Preferred Stock, Series C
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
9.000% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series D
Not designated
Total preferred shares
20,000
9,960,000
10,000,000
20,000
–
40,000
20,000
–
40,000
20,000
9,960,000
10,000,000
20,000
–
40,000
20,000
–
40,000
Series
Series C
Series D
Total
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
Dividend
Per Share
Aggregate
Dividend
Dividend
Per Share
Aggregate
Dividend
$
$
1,792.19 $
2,306.25
4,098.44 $
36
46
82
–
–
–
–
–
–
In November 2022, we issued 500,000 depositary shares (“Series C Depositary Shares”), each representing a 1/25th interest in a share of
our 9.250% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C liquidation preference $25,000 per share (the “Series C Preferred
Stock”) and in the aggregate representing 20,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, for aggregate net cash proceeds of $493 million.
Dividends, if declared, will be payable commencing on March 1, 2023, and will accrue and be payable on the first day of March and
September each year, in arrears, at an annual rate of 9.250% on the liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. From, and including
March 1, 2028 (the first “reset date”), the annual rate will reset every five years at a rate equal to the five-year treasury rate as of the most
recent reset dividend determination date plus 5.318%. We may, at our option, redeem our Series C Preferred Stock in whole but not in
part within 90 days after certain rating agency events, or a regulatory capital event, or in whole or in part, from time to time, during the
three-month period prior to each reset date.
We may, at our option, redeem the Series C Preferred Stock, (a) in whole but not in part within 90 days after the occurrence of a rating
agency event at a redemption price equal to 102% of the stated amount of a share of Series C Preferred Stock (initially, $25,500 per share
of Series C Preferred Stock, equivalent to $1,020 per Depositary Share), plus an amount equal to any dividends per share that have
accrued but not been declared and paid for the then-current dividend period to, but excluding, such redemption date; and (b)(i)in whole
but not in part within 90 days after the occurrence of a regulatory capital event, or (ii) in whole or in part, from time to time, during the
three-month period prior to March 1, 2028, and during the three-month period prior to each reset date thereafter in each case, at a
redemption price equal to the stated amount of a share of Series C Preferred Stock (initially, $25,000 per share of Series C Preferred
Stock, equivalent to $1,000 per Depositary Share), plus an amount equal to any dividends per share that have accrued but not been
declared and paid for the then-current dividend period to, but excluding, such redemption date.
In November 2022, we issued 20,000,000 depositary shares (“Series D Depositary Shares”), each representing a 1/1000th interest in a
share of our 9.000% Series D, Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25,000 per share (the “Series D Preferred Stock”)
and in the aggregate representing 20,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, for aggregate net cash proceeds of $493 million. Dividends,
if declared, will be payable commencing on March 1, 2023, and will accrue and be payable quarterly on the first day of March, June,
September, and December each year, in arrears, at an annual rate of 9.000%. We may, at our option, redeem our Series D Preferred Stock
in whole but not in part within 90 days after certain rating agency events, or a regulatory capital event, or in whole or in part, at any time
or from time to time, on or after December 1, 2027.
We may, at our option, redeem the Series D Preferred Stock, (a) in whole but not in part, at any time prior to December 1, 2027, within
90 days after the occurrence of a rating agency event at a redemption price equal to 102% of the stated amount of a share of Series D
Preferred Stock (initially, $25,500 per share of Series D Preferred Stock, equivalent to $25.50 per Depositary Share), plus an amount equal
to any dividends per share that have accrued but not been declared and paid for the then-current dividend period to, but excluding, such
204
redemption date, and (b)(i) in whole but not in part, at any time prior to December 1, 2027, within 90 days after the occurrence of a
regulatory capital event; or (ii) in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time on or after December 1, 2027, in each case, at a
redemption price equal to the stated amount of a share of Series D Preferred Stock (initially, $25,000 per share of Series D Preferred
Stock, equivalent to $25.00 per Depositary Share), plus an amount equal to any dividends per share that have accrued but not been
declared and paid for the then-current dividend period to, but excluding, such redemption date.
The Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock (together, the “Preferred Stock”) rank equally with each other for
liquidation preference. The Preferred Stock is senior to our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends, if declared, and
distributions of assets upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company. The ability of the Company to declare or pay
dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, shares of its common stock or any shares of the Company that rank junior to, or
on parity with, the Preferred Stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that we do not declare and pay (or set aside) dividends on
the Preferred Stock for the last preceding dividend period.
Except as otherwise provided by law, every holder of Preferred Stock will have the right at every shareholders’ meeting to one vote for
each share of Preferred Stock held in their name as of the record date for such meeting. In addition, at any time when six or more
quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive, on one or more series of the Preferred Stock is in default, the holders of all preferred
stock at the time or times outstanding as to which such default shall exist shall have certain voting rights with respect to the election of
additional directors to the Company’s Board of Directors, as provided in the Certificate of Designations for each series of Preferred
Stock.
Each share of Preferred Stock is perpetual and has no maturity date. The Preferred Stock is not convertible into, or exchangeable for, any
other class or series of stock or other securities of the Company or its subsidiaries and is not subject to any mandatory redemption,
sinking fund, retirement fund, purchase fund, or other similar provisions.
Our Series C and D Preferred Stock are without par value.
Common Shares
The changes in our common stock (number of shares) were as follows:
Common Stock
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Stock compensation/issued for benefit plans
Retirement/cancellation of shares
Balance as of end-of-year
Common Stock as of End-of-Year
Basic basis
Diluted basis
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
169,220,511
445,626
–
169,666,137
177,193,515
692,491
(8,665,495)
169,220,511
192,329,691
1,106,572
(16,242,748)
177,193,515
169,666,137
170,633,123
169,220,511
170,483,323
177,193,515
179,789,097
205
Average Common Shares
A reconciliation of the denominator (number of shares) in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share was as
follows:
Weighted-average shares, as used in basic calculation
Shares to cover non-vested stock
Average stock options outstanding during the year
Assumed acquisition of shares with assumed proceeds and benefits from
exercising stock options (at average market price for the year)
Shares repurchasable from measured but unrecognized stock option expense
Average deferred compensation shares
Weighted-average shares, as used in diluted calculation (1)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2023
2021
187,359,884
171,034,695
169,562,903
1,357,245
968,005
568,491
1,844,117
989,123
25,345
(21,949)
(783,232)
(1,419,165)
(944)
604,809
170,738,655
(21,006)
512,570
172,700,155
(43,314)
538,845
189,637,612
(1) Due to reporting a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2023, basic shares were used in the diluted EPS calculation for this year
as the use of diluted shares would have resulted in a lower loss per share.
In the event the average market price of LNC common stock exceeds the issue price of stock options and the options have a dilutive
effect to our EPS, such options will be shown in the table above.
The income used in the calculation of our diluted EPS is our net income (loss), reduced by preferred stock dividends. This amount is
presented on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
We have participants in our deferred compensation plans who selected LNC stock as the measure for the investment return attributable
to all or a portion of their deferral amounts. This obligation is settled in either cash or LNC stock pursuant to the applicable plan
document. We exclude deferred units of LNC stock that are antidilutive from our diluted EPS calculation. The mark-to-market
adjustment of these deferred units excluded from our diluted EPS calculation was $1 million, $13 million and $(8) million for the years
ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Our common stock is without par value.
206
AOCI
The following summarizes the components and changes in AOCI (in millions):
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities and Certain
Other Investments
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment
Change in future contract benefits and policyholder account balances, net
of reinsurance
Income tax benefit (expense)
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year
Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment
Income tax benefit (expense)
Less:
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
Market Risk Benefit Non-Performance Risk Gain (Loss)
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard
Adjustment arising during the year
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
Policyholder Liability Discount Rate Remeasurement Gain (Loss)
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard
Adjustment arising during the year
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Foreign currency translation adjustment arising during the year
Balance as of end-of-year
Funded Status of Employee Benefit Plans
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Adjustment arising during the year
Income tax benefit (expense)
Balance as of end-of-year
207
For the Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
2021
(8,916) $
–
2,413
179
9,616 $
–
(25,552)
(322)
1,306
(849)
2,291
5,039
(860)
181
(5,188) $
(15)
3
(8,916) $
388 $
–
243
(169)
(15)
91
(19)
375 $
1,741 $
–
(854)
183
1,070 $
747 $
–
(206)
46
587 $
(34) $
8
(26) $
(278) $
(13)
(3)
(294) $
(85) $
–
378
312
(144)
92
(19)
388 $
1,951 $
–
(266)
56
1,741 $
(1,265) $
–
2,559
(547)
747 $
(14) $
(20)
(34) $
(219) $
(74)
15
(278) $
9,611
3,584
(4,673)
(142)
893
838
626
(131)
9,616
(402)
25
246
152
(85)
26
(5)
(85)
–
2,874
(1,174)
251
1,951
–
(1,856)
751
(160)
(1,265)
(12)
(2)
(14)
(266)
56
(9)
(219)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The following summarizes the reclassifications out of AOCI (in millions) and the associated line item in the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Fixed Maturity AFS
Securities and Certain Other Investments
Reclassification
Associated change in future contract benefits
$
(869) $
(15) $
626 Realized gain (loss)
9
–
– Benefits
Reclassification before income
tax benefit (expense)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Reclassification, net of income tax
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative
Instruments
Interest rate contracts
Interest rate contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Foreign currency contracts
Reclassifications before income
tax benefit (expense)
Income tax benefit (expense)
$
$
Reclassifications, net of income tax
$
16
20. Segment Information
(860)
181
(679) $
(15)
3
(12) $
626 Income (loss) before taxes
(131) Federal income tax expense (benefit)
495 Net income (loss)
(1) $
31
54
7
91
(19)
72 $
2 $
(11)
62
39
92
(19)
73 $
3 Net investment income
(23) Interest and debt expense
48 Net investment income
(2) Realized gain (loss)
26 Income (loss) before taxes
(5) Federal income tax expense (benefit)
21 Net income (loss)
We provide products and services and report results through our Annuities, Life Insurance, Group Protection and Retirement Plan
Services segments. We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the
business segments. Our reporting segments reflect the manner by which our chief operating decision makers view and manage the
business. The following is a brief description of these segments and Other Operations.
The Annuities segment provides tax-deferred investment growth and lifetime income opportunities for its clients by offering variable
annuities (including RILA) and fixed annuities (including indexed).
The Life Insurance segment focuses on the creation and protection of wealth through life insurance products, including term insurance,
both single (including UL, corporate-owned UL and VUL and bank-owned UL and VUL products) and survivorship versions of IUL and
VUL products, linked-benefit products (which are UL and VUL with riders providing for long-term care costs), and critical illness and
long-term care riders, which can be attached to IUL or VUL policies.
The Group Protection segment offers group non-medical insurance products and services, including short- and long-term disability,
statutory disability and paid family medical leave administration and absence management services, term life, dental, vision and accident,
critical illness and hospital indemnity benefits and services to the employer marketplace through various forms of employee-paid and
employer-paid plans.
The Retirement Plan Services segment provides employer-sponsored defined benefit and individual retirement accounts, as well as
individual and group variable annuities, group fixed annuities and mutual-fund based programs in the retirement plan marketplace.
Other Operations includes investments related to the excess capital in our insurance subsidiaries; benefit plan obligations; the results of
certain disability income business; our run-off institutional pension business, the majority of which was sold on a group annuity basis;
debt costs; Spark program expense; and other corporate investments.
208
Segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are internal measures used by our management and Board of Directors to
evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Income (loss) from operations is GAAP net income excluding the after-tax effects of the
following items, as applicable:
•
•
Items related to annuity product features, which include changes in MRBs, including gains and losses and benefit payments, changes in
the fair value of the derivative instruments we hold to hedge GLB and GDB riders, net of fee income allocated to support the cost of
hedging them, and changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity contracts and the associated
index options we hold to hedge them, including collateral expense associated with the hedge program (collectively, “net annuity
product features”);
Items related to life insurance product features, which include changes in the fair value of derivatives we hold as part of VUL hedging,
changes in reserves resulting from benefit ratio unlocking associated with the impact of capital markets, and changes in the fair value
of the embedded derivative liabilities of our IUL contracts and the associated index options we hold to hedge them (collectively, “net
life insurance product features”);
• Credit loss-related adjustments on fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate and reinsurance-related assets (“credit
loss-related adjustments”);
• Changes in the fair value of equity securities, certain derivatives, certain other investments and realized gains (losses) on sales,
disposals and impairments of financial assets (collectively, “investment gains (losses)”);
• Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and mortgage loans on real estate electing the
fair value option (“changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage
loans”);
Income (loss) from the initial adoption of new accounting standards, regulations and policy changes;
Income (loss) from reserve changes, net of related amortization, on business sold through reinsurance;
•
•
• Transaction and integration costs related to mergers and acquisitions including the acquisition or divestiture, through reinsurance or
other means, of businesses or blocks of business;
• Gains (losses) on modification or early extinguishment of debt;
• Losses from the impairment of intangible assets and gains (losses) on other non-financial assets; and
•
Income (loss) from discontinued operations.
Operating revenues represent GAAP revenues excluding the pre-tax effects of the following items, as applicable:
• Changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments we hold to hedge GLB and GDB riders, net of fee income allocated to support
the cost of hedging them, and changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL contracts
and the associated index options we hold to hedge them (collectively, “revenue adjustments from annuity and life insurance product
features”);
• Credit loss-related adjustments;
•
Investment gains (losses);
• Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans;
• Revenue adjustments from the initial adoption of new accounting standards; and
• Amortization of deferred gains arising from reserve changes on business sold through reinsurance.
We use our prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 21%, where applicable, net of the impacts related to dividends received
deduction and foreign tax credits and any other permanent differences for events recognized differently in our financial statements and
federal income tax returns.
209
The tables below reconcile our segment measures of performance to the GAAP measures presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in millions):
Revenues
Operating revenues:
Annuities (1)
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations (1)
Revenue adjustments from annuity and life insurance product features
Credit loss-related adjustments
Investment gains (losses)
Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives,
trading securities and certain mortgage loans (2)
Total revenues (1)
Net Income (Loss)
Income (loss) from operations:
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Net annuity product features, after-tax
Net life insurance product features, after-tax
Credit loss-related adjustments, after-tax
Investment gains (losses), after-tax
Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives,
trading securities and certain mortgage loans, after-tax (2)
Impairment of intangibles
Transaction and integration costs related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures,
after-tax (3)
Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment of debt, after-tax
Net income (loss)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
3,002 $
6,907
5,563
1,310
(755)
(2,541)
(80)
(959)
4,482 $
6,747
5,304
1,274
156
1,009
(130)
20
4,691
7,387
4,995
1,322
181
(1,696)
110
658
(802)
11,645 $
(52)
18,810 $
67
17,715
$
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
$
1,073 $
(159)
299
171
(411)
52
(310)
(63)
(744)
(633)
–
(27)
–
(752) $
1,161 $
(2,094)
41
211
(486)
3,266
21
(103)
16
(41)
(634)
–
–
1,358 $
1,337
487
(164)
248
(371)
1,600
(1)
87
519
53
–
(11)
(6)
3,778
(1) Includes ceded insurance premiums primarily related to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction effective in the fourth quarter of
2023. For more information, see Note 8.
(2) Includes primarily changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction effective
(3)
in the fourth quarter of 2023. For more information, see Notes 6 and 8.
Includes costs pertaining to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction and the planned sale of our wealth management business. For
more information, see Note 1 and Note 8, respectively.
210
Other segment information (in millions) was as follows:
Net Investment Income
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total net investment income
Federal Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Net annuity product features
Net life insurance product features
Credit loss-related adjustments
Investment gains (losses)
Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives,
trading securities and certain mortgage loans
Transaction and integration costs related to mergers,
acquisitions and divestitures
Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment of debt
Total federal income tax expense (benefit)
Assets
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total assets
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
1,668 $
2,712
339
1,012
148
5,879 $
1,463 $
2,587
334
976
155
5,515 $
1,400
3,207
365
991
148
6,111
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
140 $
(72)
80
30
(115)
14
(83)
(17)
(198)
185 $
(587)
11
36
(116)
867
5
(27)
4
(168)
(11)
(7)
–
(396) $
–
–
367 $
255
110
(44)
52
(105)
427
—
20
141
14
(3)
(2)
865
As of December 31,
2022
2023
185,599 $
108,932
9,714
46,793
21,375
372,413 $
167,434
94,568
9,784
41,914
20,631
334,331
$
$
$
$
$
$
211
21. Realized Gain (Loss)
Details underlying realized gain (loss) (in millions) reported on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as
follows:
Fixed maturity AFS securities: (1)
Gross gains
Gross losses
Credit loss benefit (expense) (2)
Intent to sell impairments
Realized gain (loss) on equity securities (3)
Credit loss benefit (expense) on mortgage loans on real estate
Credit loss benefit (expense) on reinsurance-related assets (4)
Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments (5)(6)
Indexed product derivative results (7)
Derivative results (8)
Other realized gain (loss)
Total realized gain (loss)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
$
630 $
(408)
(22)
(1,091)
(6)
(16)
(41)
(1,298)
(232)
(1,830)
3
(4,311) $
38 $
(53)
(15)
–
15
(3)
(112)
37
74
901
(42)
840 $
663
(37)
(11)
–
44
112
6
63
22
(1,717)
(12)
(867)
(1) Includes impairments of certain fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, resulting from the Company’s intent to
sell these securities as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. Pursuant to the applicable accounting guidance, the
Company impaired the securities in a loss position down to fair market value upon entry into the agreements in the second quarter of
2023 and recognized additional impairment on certain of these securities during the third quarter of 2023 due to higher interest rates.
Interest rates declined during the fourth quarter of 2023, which resulted in recognition of a $335 million pre-tax net gain upon close
of the transaction, included in gross gains and gross losses. See Notes 4 and 8 for additional information.
(2) Includes changes in the allowance for credit losses as well as direct write-downs to amortized cost as a result of negative credit
events.
(3) Includes mark-to-market adjustments on equity securities still held of $3 million, $10 million and $47 million for the years ended
December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(4) Includes the release of reinsurance recoverables and the corresponding allowance for credit losses related to a third-party reinsurer,
Scottish Re, where liquidation proceedings commenced during the third quarter of 2023. As of September 30, 2023, reinsurance
coverage terminated and all business ceded to Scottish Re was therefore recaptured.
(5) Represents changes in the fair values of derivatives we hold as part of VUL hedging, reinsurance-related embedded derivatives and
trading securities. We recognized a pre-tax loss of $789 million on a reinsurance-related embedded derivative due to the increase in
the market value of the fixed maturity AFS securities included within the Fortitude Re funds withheld account. Also includes an $87
million pre-tax loss related to interest rate futures used to hedge the assets used as consideration in the Fortitude Re reinsurance
transaction. See Note 8 for additional information.
(6) Includes gains and losses from fair value changes on mortgage loans on real estate accounted for under the fair value option of
$(11) million, $(24) million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(7) Represents the change in fair value of the index options that we hold and the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative
liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL contracts, and the associated index options to hedge policyholder index allocations
applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products.
(8) Includes the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to support capital needs associated with our GLB and
GDB riders net of fee income allocated to support the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments.
212
22. Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Commissions
General and administrative expenses
DAC and VOBA deferrals, net of amortization
Broker-dealer expenses
Taxes, licenses and fees
Expenses associated with reserve financing and LOCs
Specifically identifiable intangible asset amortization
Other amortization
Transaction and integration costs related to
mergers, acquisitions and divestitures
Total
$
$
2,075 $
2,390
(174)
526
330
114
37
7
34
5,339 $
2,189 $
2,240
(352)
536
339
108
37
28
–
5,125 $
2,223
2,252
(337)
570
345
102
37
13
14
5,219
23. Federal Income Taxes
The federal income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations (in millions) was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Current
Deferred
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
$
$
(3) $
(393)
(396) $
3 $
364
367 $
12
853
865
A reconciliation of the effective tax rate differences (in millions) was as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
$
Income (loss) before taxes
Federal statutory rate
Federal income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate
Effect of:
Tax-preferred investment income (1)
Tax credits
Excess tax expense (benefit) from stock-based
compensation
Goodwill impairment
Other items
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
$
Effective tax rate
(1,148)
$
1,725
$
4,643
21 %
(241)
(126)
(40)
4
–
7
(396)
34 %
$
21 %
362
(90)
(42)
(1)
133
5
367
21 %
$
21 %
975
(88)
(26)
–
–
4
865
19 %
(1) Relates primarily to separate account dividends eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
213
The federal income tax asset (liability) (in millions) was as follows:
Current
Deferred
Total federal income tax asset (liability)
As of December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
112 $
929
1,041 $
83
1,313
1,396
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities (in millions) were as follows:
Deferred Tax Assets
Insurance liabilities and reinsurance-related balances
Reinsurance-related embedded derivative liabilities
Compensation and benefit plans
Intangibles
Net unrealized loss on fixed maturity AFS securities
Net unrealized loss on trading securities
Investment activity
Tax credits
Net operating losses
Capital losses
Deferred gain on reinsurance
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred Tax Liabilities
DAC and VOBA
Investment activity
Deferred loss on reinsurance
Reinsurance-related embedded derivative assets
MRB-related activity
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
$
$
$
$
$
As of December 31,
2023
2022
1,900 $
116
184
18
1,826
33
–
131
87
93
–
4,388 $
1,744 $
617
465
–
429
204
3,459 $
929 $
410
–
172
21
2,265
70
273
101
278
–
57
3,647
1,742
–
–
87
134
371
2,334
1,313
As of December 31, 2023, we have $131 million of federal income tax credits that can be carried forward to 2030 through 2033. As of
December 31, 2023, we have $414 million of net operating losses to carry forward to future years. As of December 31, 2023, we have
$442 million of capital losses to carry forward to future years. The net operating losses arose in tax years 2018 and 2021 and, under the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changes, have an unlimited carryforward period. The capital losses arose in tax year 2023 and can be carried back
three years and forward five years. As a result, management believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset associated
with the loss carryforwards will be realized. Inclusive of the tax attribute for the net operating losses, although realization is not assured,
management believes that it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of all our deferred tax assets, and, accordingly, no
valuation allowance has been recorded.
We are subject to examination by U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income authorities. With few exceptions for limited scope review,
we are no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years before 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, the Internal Revenue Service
commenced an examination of our 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 refund claims. We are currently under examination by several state and
local taxing jurisdictions; however, we do not expect these examinations will materially impact us.
214
A reconciliation of the gross unrecognized federal tax benefits (in millions) was as follows:
Balance as of beginning-of-year
Decreases for prior year tax positions
Increases for prior year tax positions
Settlements for prior year tax positions
Balance as of end-of-year
For the Years Ended December 31,
2023
2022
$
$
68 $
(6)
25
–
87 $
73
(6)
1
–
68
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, $75 million and $49 million, respectively, of our gross unrecognized federal tax benefits presented
above, if recognized, would have affected our federal income tax expense (benefit) and our effective tax rate. We anticipate that it is
reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits primarily associated with separate account dividends-received deduction, tax credits
and compensation, upon completion of our ongoing refund claims review, will decrease by $43 million by the end of 2024.
We recognize interest and penalties accrued, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. For the years
ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we recognized no interest and penalty expense (benefit), and there was no accrued interest and
penalty expense related to the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net
income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of
2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. Both provisions became effective for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. We determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative minimum tax
for 2023.
24. Statutory Information and Restrictions
The Company’s domestic life insurance subsidiaries prepare financial statements in accordance with statutory accounting principles
(“SAP”) prescribed or permitted by the insurance departments of their states of domicile, which may vary materially from GAAP.
Prescribed SAP includes the Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(“NAIC”) as well as state laws, regulations and administrative rules. Permitted SAP encompasses all accounting practices not so
prescribed. The principal differences between statutory financial statements and financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP
are that statutory financial statements do not reflect DAC, some bond portfolios may be carried at amortized cost, assets and liabilities are
presented net of reinsurance, contract holder liabilities are generally valued using more conservative assumptions and certain assets are
non-admitted.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to the applicable laws and regulations of their respective states of domicile. Changes in these laws
and regulations could change capital levels or capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries.
Statutory capital and surplus, net gain (loss) from operations, after-tax, net income (loss) and dividends to the LNC holding company
amounts (in millions) below consist of all or a combination of the following entities: LNL, LLANY, FPP, Lincoln Reinsurance Company
of South Carolina, Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont I, Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont III, Lincoln Reinsurance
Company of Vermont IV, Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont V, Lincoln Reinsurance Company of Vermont VI and Lincoln
Reinsurance Company of Vermont VII.
U.S. capital and surplus
U.S. net gain (loss) from operations, after-tax
U.S. net income (loss)
U.S. dividends to LNC holding company
$
$
215
As of December 31,
2023
2022
8,129 $
8,624
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
(2,484) $
(2,916)
510
1,730 $
1,991
667
(1,262)
(547)
1,955
State Prescribed and Permitted Practices
The states of domicile of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries have adopted certain prescribed or permitted accounting practices that
differ from those found in NAIC SAP. These prescribed practices are the calculation of reserves on universal life policies based on the
Indiana universal life method as prescribed by the state of Indiana for policies issued before January 1, 2006, the use of a more
conservative valuation interest rate on certain annuities prescribed by the states of Indiana and New York. Also, the state of New York
prescribes use of the continuous Commissioners’ Annuity Reserve Valuation Method in the calculation of reserves and use of minimum
reserve methods and assumptions for variable annuity and individual life insurance contracts that may be more conservative than those
required by NAIC SAP. The statutory permitted practices allow accounting for certain derivative assets at amortized cost and allow
determining certain indexed annuity and indexed universal life statutory reserve calculations with the assumption that the market value of
the related liability call option(s) associated with the current index term is zero. At the conclusion of the index term, credited interest is
reflected in the reserve as realized, based on actual index performance. The statutory accounting practices also allow accounting for
certain group fixed annuity assets at general account balances.
The Vermont reinsurance subsidiaries also have certain accounting practices permitted by the state of Vermont that differ from those
found in NAIC SAP. One permitted practice involves accounting for the lesser of the face amount of all amounts outstanding under an
LOC and the value of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) additional statutory reserves as an admitted
asset and a form of surplus as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Another permitted practice involves the acquisition of an LLC note in
exchange for a variable value surplus note that is recognized as an admitted asset and a form of surplus as of December 31, 2023 and
2022. Lastly, the state of Vermont has permitted a practice to account for certain excess of loss reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated
reinsurers as an asset and form of surplus as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. These permitted practices are related to structures that
continue to be allowed in accordance with the grandfathered structures under the provisions of Actuarial Guideline 48 (“AG48”) or are
compliant under AG48 requirements.
The favorable (unfavorable) effects on statutory surplus compared to NAIC statutory surplus from the use of these prescribed and
permitted practices (in millions) were as follows:
$
State Prescribed Practices
Calculation of reserves using the Indiana universal life method
Conservative valuation rate on certain annuities
Calculation of reserves using continuous CARVM
Conservative Reg 213 reserves on variable annuity and individual life contracts
State Permitted Practice
Derivative instruments and equity indexed reserves
Assets in group fixed annuity contracts held at general account balances
Vermont Subsidiaries Permitted Practices
Lesser of LOC and XXX additional reserve as surplus
LLC notes and variable value surplus notes
Excess of loss reinsurance agreements
As of December 31,
2023
2022
(1) $
(1)
(1)
(31)
(170)
332
1,776
1,444
563
3
(36)
(1)
(37)
14
436
1,838
1,547
549
The NAIC has adopted RBC requirements for life insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus in
relation to investment and insurance risks. The requirements provide a means of measuring the minimum amount of statutory surplus
appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations based on its size and risk profile. Under RBC
requirements, regulatory compliance is determined by the ratio of a company’s total adjusted capital, as defined by the NAIC, to its
company action level of RBC (known as the “RBC ratio”), also as defined by the NAIC. The company action level may be triggered if
the RBC ratio is between 75% and 100%, which would require the insurer to submit a plan to the regulator detailing corrective action it
proposes to undertake. As of December 31, 2023, the consolidated RBC ratio for LNC’s statutory insurance companies was
approximately four times the aforementioned company action level RBC.
216
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of
dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary
insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the
“Commissioner”), only from unassigned surplus and must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend,
along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current
statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the
Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory
unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits.
LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under the laws of New York.
Under New York law, the applicable statutory limitation on dividends is equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the
immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized
capital gains. We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $790 million in 2024
without prior approval from the respective Commissioner of Insurance.
All payments of principal and interest on surplus notes between LNC and our insurance subsidiaries must be approved by the respective
Commissioner of Insurance.
25. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Data
The following summarizes our supplemental cash flow data (in millions):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2023
Net cash paid (received) for:
Interest
Income taxes
Non-cash transactions:
$
344 $
–
269 $
(54)
277
1
Net reduction of fixed maturity AFS securities, other investments and
accrued investment income in connection with a reinsurance transaction
(14,848)
Establishment of funds withheld liability in connection with
a reinsurance transaction
(9,459)
–
–
(4,133)
–
217
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Conclusions Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period required by this report, we, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act).
Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be
disclosed in our periodic reports under the Exchange Act.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is included on page 102 of “Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data” and is incorporated herein by reference.
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the control system’s objectives
will be met. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have
been detected. Projections of any evaluation of controls’ effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as noted in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included on page 103 of “Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” with respect to the completion of the remediation of the material weakness, there has
been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2023, that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Further details are described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Rule 10b5-1 and Non-Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f)) adopted
or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408 of
Regulation S-K.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.
218
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
Information required by this item relating to our executive officers is incorporated by reference to “Part I – Information About our
Executive Officers” of this Form 10-K. Information required by this item relating to our directors and corporate governance matters is
incorporated by reference to the sections captioned “Governance of the Company – Our Corporate Governance Guidelines,”
“Governance of the Company – Director Nomination Process,” “Governance of the Company – Board Committees – Current
Committee Membership and Meetings Held During 2023,” “Governance of the Company – Board Committees – Audit Committee,”
“Agenda Item 1 – Election of Directors” and “General Information – Shareholder Proposals for the 2025 Annual Meeting” of LNC’s
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 23, 2024.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections captioned “Compensation of Outside Directors,”
“Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” “Executive Compensation Tables” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation” of LNC’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 23, 2024.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections captioned “Security Ownership” and “Equity
Compensation Plan Information” of LNC’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 23, 2024.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections captioned “Related-Party Transactions” and “Governance
of the Company – Director Independence” of LNC’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 23, 2024.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections captioned “Agenda Item 2 – Ratification of Appointment
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of LNC’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 23, 2024.
219
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements
PART IV
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Lincoln National Corporation are included in Part II – Item 8:
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
The Financial Statement Schedules are listed in the Index to Financial Statement Schedules on page FS-1, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
(a) (3) Listing of Exhibits
The Exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits beginning on page 221, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) The Financial Statement Schedules for Lincoln National Corporation begin on page FS-2, which are incorporated herein by reference.
220
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Restated Articles of Incorporation of LNC are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K
(File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 14, 2017.
Articles of Amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of LNC designating the 9.250% Fixed Rate
Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C, dated November 18, 2022, is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on November 22, 2022.
Articles of Amendment of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of LNC designating the 9.000% Non-
Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, dated November 18, 2022, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on November 22, 2022.
Amended and Restated Bylaws of LNC (effective September 11, 2023) are incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on September 11, 2023.
Indenture of LNC, dated as of September 15, 1994, between LNC and The Bank of New York, as trustee, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to LNC’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A (File No.
33-55379) filed with the SEC on September 15, 1994.
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2006, to Indenture dated as of September 15, 1994,
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of May 1, 1996, between LNC and The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A. (successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company and The First National Bank of
Chicago) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(j) to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.
Third Supplemental Junior Subordinated Indenture dated May 17, 2006, to Junior Subordinated Indenture,
dated as of May 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028)
filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006.
Fourth Supplemental Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2006, to Junior Subordinated
Indenture, dated May 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No.
1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Fifth Supplemental Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 13, 2007, to Junior Subordinated
Indenture, dated May 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No.
1-6028) filed with the SEC on March 13, 2007.
Sixth Supplemental Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, to Junior Subordinated
Indenture, dated May 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No.
1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Seventh Supplemental Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, to Junior Subordinated
Indenture, dated May 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No.
1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Senior Indenture, dated as of March 10, 2009, between LNC and the Bank of New York Mellon, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form S-3ASR (File No. 333-157822) filed with the SEC
on March 10, 2009.
221
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 18, 2020, to Senior Indenture dated as of March 10, 2009
between LNC and the Bank of New York Mellon, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to LNC’s
Form S-3ASR (File No. 333-249058) filed with the SEC on September 25, 2020.
Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 10, 2009, between LNC and the Bank of New York
Mellon, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to LNC’s Form S-3ASR (File No. 333-157822) filed with
the SEC on March 10, 2009.
Subordinated Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, between LNC and The Bank of New York Mellon, as
trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with
the SEC on August 12, 2021.
First Supplemental Subordinated Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, to Subordinated Indenture dated August
11, 2021, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed
with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Second Supplemental Subordinated Indenture, dated August 11, 2021, to Subordinated Indenture dated
August 11, 2021, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028)
filed with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Form of 7.00% Capital Securities due 2066 of LNC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s
Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006.
Form of 6.15% Senior Notes due April 6, 2036 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-
K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on April 7, 2006.
Form of 6.05% Capital Securities due 2067 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-K
(File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on March 13, 2007.
Form of 6.30% Senior Notes due 2037 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on October 9, 2007.
Form of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2040 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on June 18, 2010.
Form of 3.350% Senior Notes due 2025 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on March 10, 2015.
Form of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2026 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on December 12, 2016.
Form of 3.800% Senior Notes due 2028 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018.
Form of 4.350% Senior Notes due 2048 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018.
Form of 3.050% Senior Notes due 2030 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 19, 2019.
Form of 3.400% Senior Notes due 2031, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on May 15, 2020.
222
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
Form of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2050, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File
No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on May 15, 2020.
Form of Floating Rate Subordinated Note due 2066 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the
Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Form of Floating Rate Subordinated Note due 2067 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the
Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on August 12, 2021.
Form of 3.400% Senior Notes due 2032, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form
8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on March 1, 2022.
Deposit Agreement with respect to the 9.250% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C,
dated November 22, 2022, by and among the Company, Equiniti Trust Company, as depositary, and the
holders from time to time of the depositary receipts described therein, is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on November 22, 2022.
Deposit Agreement with respect to the 9.000% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, dated November
22, 2022, by and among the Company, Equiniti Trust Company, as depositary, and the holders from time to
time of the depositary receipts described therein, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on November 22, 2022.
Form of 9.250% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C Stock Certificate (included as
Exhibit A to Exhibit 3.2 above).
Form of 9.000% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D Stock Certificate (included as Exhibit A to
Exhibit 3.3 above).
Form of Depositary Receipt with respect to the 9.250% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series C (included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.32 above).
Form of Depositary Receipt with respect to the 9.000% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D (included
as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.33 above).
Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.38 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2022.
LNC 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan (effective May 22, 2014) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on May 28, 2014.*
LNC 2009 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended and restated on May 14, 2009)
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to LNC’s Proxy Statement (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on
April 9, 2009.*
Non-Employee Director Fees (effective May 27, 2022) are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended June 30, 2022.*
Non-Employee Director Fees (effective January 1, 2024) are filed herewith.*
Amended and Restated LNC Supplemental Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2007.*
223
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
The Severance Plan for Officers of LNC (Amended and Restated effective as of December 31, 2023) is filed
herewith.*
LNC Executive Officer Cash Severance policy is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form
8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on February 21, 2023.*
The LNC Outside Directors’ Value Sharing Plan, last amended March 8, 2001, is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(e) to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2001.*
LNC Deferred Compensation and Supplemental/Excess Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 2020, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the
year ended December 31, 2019.*
Amendment No. 1 to the LNC Deferred Compensation and Supplemental/Excess Retirement Plan is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended
December 31, 2020.*
Amendment No. 2 to the LNC Deferred Compensation and Supplemental/Excess Retirement Plan,
effective December 19, 2022, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No.
1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2022.*
Amendment No. 3 to the LNC Deferred Compensation and Supplemental/Excess Retirement Plan,
effective January 1, 2024, is filed herewith.*
LNC 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as last amended May 10, 2001, is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(g), to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2001.*
Amendment No. 2 to the LNC 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (effective February 1, 2006) is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on
January 13, 2006.*
LNC Executives’ Severance Benefit Plan (effective August 7, 2008) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.*
Amendment No. 1 to the LNC Executives’ Severance Benefit Plan (effective November 9, 2011) is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended
December 31, 2011.*
Amendment No. 2 to the LNC Executives’ Severance Benefit Plan (effective May 12, 2023) is incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on May 12, 2023.*
Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to LNC’s
Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2007.*
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.17 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2020.*
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.18 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2020.*
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.19 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2020.*
224
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2020.*
Amendment No. 5 to the Amended and Restated LNC Excess Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.21 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2020.*
LNC Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated November 5,
2008, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year
ended December 31, 2008.*
Form of Indemnification between LNC and each director is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option (“Option”) Award Agreement is incorporated by Reference to Exhibit
10.35 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2012.*
Amendment #1 to the Form of Option Award Agreements, effective August 13, 2014, is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.28 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2014.*
Amendment #2 to the Form of Option Award Agreements, effective August 13, 2014, is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2014.*
Form of Option Award Agreement under the LNC 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan is incorporated by
Reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for Senior Management Committee (“SMC”) (Other than Chief
Executive Officer (“CEO”)) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No.
1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2017.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for SMC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to LNC’s Form 10-
Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.*
Form of Long-Term Incentive Award Program Performance Cycle (“PSA”) Agreement for SMC (other than
CEO) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2020.*
10.33
Form of Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) Award Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.*
10.34
Form of Option Award Agreement for Successor CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (effective
February 2022) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
Form of PSA Agreement for Successor CEO and CFO (effective February 2022) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for Successor CEO and CFO (effective February 2022) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) (effective February 2022) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
Form of PSA Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) (effective February 2022) is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
225
10.39
10.40
10.41
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.50
10.51
10.52
10.53
Form of PSA Agreement for Section 16 Officers (effective February 2022) is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for Section 16 Officers (effective February 2022) is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) (effective for officers joining SMC on or
after May 26, 2022) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for
the quarter ended June 30, 2022.*
Form of PSA Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) (effective for officers joining SMC on or after May 26,
2022) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2022.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for SMC (other than CEO) (effective for officers joining SMC on or after
May 26, 2022) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2022.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for Kenneth S. Solon (December 2022) is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.46 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2022.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for Kenneth S. Solon (December 2022) is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.47 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2022.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for CEO (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of PSA Agreement for CEO (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for CEO (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for Chief Information Officer, Kenneth S. Solon (“CIO”) (effective
February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of PSA Agreement for CIO (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for CIO (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for SMC (executives other than CEO and CIO who joined SMC prior to
2022) (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No.
1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of PSA Agreement for SMC (executives other than CEO and CIO who joined SMC prior to 2022)
(effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No.
1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
226
10.54
10.55
10.56
10.57
10.58
10.59
10.60
10.61
10.62
10.63
10.64
10.65
10.66
Form of RSU Award Agreement for SMC (executives other than CEO and CIO who joined SMC prior to
2022) (effective February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No.
1-6028) for the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of Option Award Agreement for SMC (executives who joined SMC in or after 2022) (effective
February 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2023.*
Form of PSA Agreement for SMC (executives who joined SMC in or after 2022) (effective February 2023) is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2023.*
Form of RSU Award Agreement for SMC (executives who joined SMC in or after 2022) (effective February
2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2023.*
Amendment No. 1 to Option Award Agreements listed above (effective November 8, 2023 to Option
awards outstanding under the LNC 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan and LNC 2020 Incentive
Compensation Plan as of such date) is filed herewith.*
Amendment No. 1 to PSA Agreements listed above (effective November 8, 2023 to PSAs outstanding under
the LNC 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan and LNC 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan as of such date) is
filed herewith.*
Amendment No. 1 to RSU Award Agreements listed above (effective November 8, 2023 to RSU awards
outstanding under the LNC 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan and LNC 2020 Incentive Compensation
Plan as of such date) is filed herewith.*
Separation Agreement and General Release, dated February 10, 2023, between Lincoln National Corporation
and Randal J. Freitag is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LNC’s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-6028) for
the quarter ended March 31, 2023.*^
Lincoln National Corporation 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to LNC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-239117) filed with the SEC on June 12, 2020.*
Amendment No. 1 to the Lincoln National Corporation 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (effective May
27, 2022) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to LNC’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-265314) filed with the SEC on May 31, 2022.*
Amendment No. 2 to the Lincoln National Corporation 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan (effective May
25, 2023) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the
SEC on May 26, 2023.*
LNC Domestic Relocation Policy Home Sale Assistance Plan, effective as of September 6, 2007, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.*
Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement by and among LNC, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company,
Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited and Swiss Re Life & Health America Inc. dated
July 27, 2001 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the
SEC on August 1, 2001. Omitted schedules and exhibits listed in the Agreement will be furnished to the SEC
upon request.
227
10.67
10.68
10.69
21
23
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Indemnity Reinsurance Agreement, dated as of January 1, 1998, between Connecticut General Life Insurance
Company and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67
to LNC’s Form 10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2008.^
Coinsurance Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1998, AETNA Life Insurance and Annuity Company and
Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.68 to LNC’s Form
10-K (File No. 1-6028) for the year ended December 31, 2008.^
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2023, among LNC, as an
Account Party and Guarantor, the Subsidiary Account Parties, as additional Account Parties, Bank of
America, N.A. as administrative agent, and the other lenders named therein, is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to LNC’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-6028) filed with the SEC on December 21, 2023.
Subsidiaries List.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
97
LNC Compensation Recovery Policy is filed herewith.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its
XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
* This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
^ Schedules to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a) of Regulation S-K. LNC will furnish
supplementally a copy of the schedule to the SEC, upon request.
NOTE: This is an abbreviated version of the Lincoln National Corporation Form 10-K. Copies of the full Form 10-K and these
exhibits are available electronically at www.sec.gov or www.lfg.com, or by writing to the Corporate Secretary at Lincoln
National Corporation, 150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Suite A305, Radnor, PA 19087.
228
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, LNC has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Dated: February 22, 2024
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
By:
/s/ Christopher Neczypor
Christopher Neczypor
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 22, 2024.
Title
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Signature
/s/ Ellen G. Cooper
Ellen G. Cooper
/s/ Christopher Neczypor
Christopher Neczypor
/s/ Adam Cohen
Adam Cohen
/s/ Deirdre P. Connelly
Deirdre P. Connelly
/s/ William H. Cunningham
William H. Cunningham
/s/Reginald E. Davis
Reginald E. Davis
/s/ Eric G. Johnson
Eric G. Johnson
/s/ Gary C. Kelly
Gary C. Kelly
/s/ M. Leanne Lachman
M. Leanne Lachman
/s/Dale LeFebvre
Dale LeFebvre
/s/ Janet Liang
Janet Liang
/s/ Michael F. Mee
Michael F. Mee
/s/ Owen Ryan
Owen Ryan
/s/ Lynn M. Utter
Lynn M. Utter
229
[This page intentionally left blank]
Index to Financial Statement Schedules
I – Consolidated Summary of Investments – Other than Investments in Related Parties
II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
III – Condensed Supplementary Insurance Information
IV – Consolidated Reinsurance
FS-2
FS-3
FS-6
FS-8
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are
not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial
statements, and therefore omitted. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
– Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates” on page 43 for more detail on items contained within these schedules.
FS-1
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I – CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS – OTHER THAN
INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
(in millions)
Column A
Column B
Column C
As of December 31, 2023
Fair
Value
Column D
Carrying
Value
Cost or
Amortized Cost
Type of Investment
Fixed Maturity Available-For-Sale Securities (1)
Bonds:
U.S. government bonds
Foreign government bonds
State and municipal bonds
Public utilities
All other corporate bonds
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities
Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities
Equity Securities
Common stocks:
Banks, trusts and insurance companies
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
Non-redeemable preferred securities
Total equity securities
Trading Securities
Mortgage loans on real estate (2)
Policy loans
Derivative investments
Other investments
Total investments
$
$
416 $
314
3,106
12,683
64,402
16,268
244
97,433
29
41
270
340
2,515
19,115
2,476
2,714
5,015
129,608
393 $
283
2,790
11,320
58,337
15,368
247
88,738
32
38
236
306
2,359
17,407
N/A
6,474
5,015
$
393
283
2,790
11,320
58,337
15,368
247
88,738
32
38
236
306
2,359
18,963
2,476
6,474
5,015
124,331
(1) For investments deemed to have declines in value that are impairment-related, an allowance for credit losses is recorded to reduce
the carrying value to their estimated realizable value.
(2) Mortgage loans on real estate are generally carried at unpaid principal balances adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion
of discounts and are net of allowance for credit losses. We carry certain mortgage loans at fair value where the fair value option has
been elected.
FS-2
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
BALANCE SHEETS
(Parent Company Only) (in millions, except share data)
As of December 31,
2022
2023
ASSETS
Investments in subsidiaries (1)
Derivative investments
Other investments
Cash and invested cash
Loans and accrued interest to subsidiaries (1)
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Common stock dividends payable
Short-term debt
Long-term debt
Loans from subsidiaries (1)
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Contingencies and Commitments
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock – 10,000,000 shares authorized:
$
$
$
12,205 $
169
34
129
2,606
144
15,287 $
76 $
250
6,949
572
547
8,394
Series C preferred stock – 20,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023
Series D preferred stock – 20,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023
493
493
Common stock – 800,000,000 shares authorized; 169,666,137 and 169,220,511 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
(1) Eliminated in consolidation
4,605
4,778
(3,476)
6,893
15,287 $
$
9,782
119
92
715
2,491
101
13,300
76
500
6,455
679
488
8,198
493
493
4,544
5,924
(6,352)
5,102
13,300
FS-3
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (Continued)
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Parent Company Only) (in millions)
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries (1)
Interest from subsidiaries (1)
Net investment income
Total revenues
Expenses
Operating and administrative expenses
Interest – subsidiaries (1)
Interest – other
Total expenses
Income (loss) before federal income taxes, equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) before equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized investment gain (loss)
Market risk benefit non-performance risk gain (loss)
Policyholder liability discount rate remeasurement gain (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Funded status of employee benefit plans
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Comprehensive income (loss)
(1) Eliminated in consolidation.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
$
685 $
233
25
943
78
175
289
542
401
(61)
462
(1,214)
(752)
3,715
(671)
(160)
8
(16)
2,876
2,124 $
797 $
159
3
959
52
38
266
356
603
(42)
645
713
1,358
(18,059)
(210)
2,012
(20)
(59)
(16,336)
(14,978) $
2,060
114
1
2,175
69
10
263
342
1,833
(49)
1,882
1,896
3,778
(3,287)
(923)
591
(2)
47
(3,574)
204
FS-4
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT (Continued)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Parent Company Only) (in millions)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2023
$
398 $
608 $
1,860
(7)
69
45
107
(500)
–
—
(84)
(113)
(7)
–
–
(82)
(305)
(1,091)
(586)
715
129 $
(925)
583
(5)
(347)
(300)
296
—
(563)
708
(16)
986
(550)
—
(310)
251
512
203
715 $
(65)
168
(40)
63
—
—
(8)
(188)
(234)
20
—
(1,105)
—
(319)
(1,834)
89
114
203
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital contribution to subsidiaries (1)
Net change in collateral on investments, derivatives and related settlements
Other
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Payment of long-term debt, including current maturities
Issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs
Payment related to modification or early extinguishment of debt
Increase (decrease) in loans from subsidiaries, net (1)
Increase (decrease) in loans to subsidiaries, net (1)
Common stock issued for benefit plans
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
Repurchase of common stock
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders
Dividends paid to common stockholders
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash, invested cash and restricted cash
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of beginning-of-year
Cash, invested cash and restricted cash as of end-of-year
$
(1) Eliminated in consolidation.
FS-5
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE III – CONDENSED SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
(in millions)
Column A
Column B
Column C
Column D
Column E
Column F
Segment
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
DAC
and
VOBA
Future
Contract
Benefits
Policyholder
Account
Unearned
Premiums (1) Balances (2)
Insurance
Premiums
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
4,187 $
7,621
154
239
–
12,201 $
2,090 $
21,613
6,282
–
9,879
39,864 $
– $
–
–
–
–
– $
54,496 $
37,432
–
23,784
5,025
120,737 $
(1,584)
1,162
5,014
–
(920)
3,672
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
4,207 $
7,453
141
236
–
12,037 $
2,005 $
20,953
6,086
–
9,782
38,826 $
– $
–
–
–
–
– $
45,549 $
37,959
–
25,138
5,789
114,435 $
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
4,185 $
7,125
140
235
–
11,685 $
2,511 $
19,564
6,604
–
12,746
41,425 $
– $
–
–
–
–
– $
41,700 $
38,475
–
23,579
6,473
110,227 $
165
1,146
4,768
–
8
6,087
116
1,033
4,450
–
18
5,617
$
$
$
$
$
$
(1) Unearned premiums are included in Column C, future contract benefits.
FS-6
Segment
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
Annuities
Life Insurance
Group Protection
Retirement Plan Services
Other Operations
Total
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE III – CONDENSED SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION (Continued)
(in millions)
Column A
Column G
Column H
Benefits
and
Interest
Credited
Column I
Amortization
of DAC
and
VOBA
Column J
Column K
Other
Operating
Expenses
Premiums
Written
Net
Investment
Income
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
1,668 $
2,712
339
1,012
148
5,879 $
(193) $
5,717
4,025
664
(827)
9,386 $
430 $
492
100
18
–
1,040 $
1,618 $
755
1,347
427
636
4,783 $
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
1,463 $
2,587
334
976
155
5,515 $
1,204 $
5,381
4,039
629
103
11,356 $
429 $
478
97
18
–
1,022 $
1,587 $
715
1,219
379
653
4,553 $
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
1,400 $
3,207
365
991
148
6,111 $
1,030 $
5,593
4,075
616
118
11,432 $
403 $
476
139
19
–
1,037 $
1,699 $
739
1,153
387
561
4,539 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
FS-7
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE IV – CONSOLIDATED REINSURANCE
(in millions)
Column A
Column B
Description
Gross
Amount
Column C
Ceded
to
Other
Companies
Column D
Assumed
from
Other
Companies
Column E
Net
Amount
Column F
Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
Individual life insurance in-force (1)
Premiums:
Annuities and life insurance (2)
Accident and health insurance
Total premiums
Individual life insurance in-force (1)
Premiums:
Annuities and life insurance (2)
Accident and health insurance
Total premiums
Individual life insurance in-force (1)
Premiums:
Annuities and life insurance (2)
Accident and health insurance
Total premiums
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
$
2,094,011 $
1,072,577 $
6,024 $
1,027,458
0.6 %
10,369
3,413
13,782 $
4,700
33
4,733 $
$
86
4
90 $
5,755
3,384
9,139
1.5 %
0.1 %
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
$
2,028,279 $
831,478 $
6,512 $
1,203,313
0.5 %
10,365
3,242
13,607 $
1,981
34
2,015 $
$
94
4
98 $
8,477
3,213
11,690
1.1 %
0.1 %
As of or For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
$
1,845,479 $
776,226 $
7,659 $
1,076,912
0.7 %
10,365
3,050
13,415 $
1,816
37
1,853 $
$
88
6
94 $
8,637
3,019
11,656
1.0 %
0.2 %
(1) Includes Group Protection segment and Other Operations in-force amounts.
(2) Includes insurance fees on universal life and other interest-sensitive products.
FS-8
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Lincoln National Corporation and in the related
prospectuses listed below:
1. Forms S-3
a. No. 333-270000 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation automatic shelf registration for certain securities,
b. No. 333-261018 pertaining to the LNL Agents’ 401(k) Savings Plan,
c. No. 333-256416 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation 2009 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan,
and
d. No. 333-265361 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Agents and Brokers;
2. Forms S-8
a. No. 333-203690 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation 2009 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan
and the Jefferson-Pilot Corporation Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan,
b. No. 333-196233 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan,
c. Nos. 333-239117, 333-265314 and 333-272223 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation 2020 Incentive Compensation
Plan,
d. No. 333-155385 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Deferred Compensation and Supplemental/Excess
Retirement Plan,
e. No. 333-142872 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
f. No. 333-133039 pertaining to various Jefferson-Pilot Corporation benefit plans,
g. Nos. 333-143796 and 333-126452 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for
Employees,
h. Nos. 333-126020 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Employees’ Savings and Profit-Sharing Plan and 333-161989
pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Employees’ Savings and Retirement Plan;
i. Nos. 333-143795 and 333-121069 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-
Employee Directors, and
j. Nos. 033-58113 and 333-105344 pertaining to the Lincoln National Corporation 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors;
of our reports dated February 22, 2024, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Lincoln
National Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Lincoln National Corporation, included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2023.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 22, 2024
Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Ellen G. Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lincoln National Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a)
b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 22, 2024
/s/ Ellen G. Cooper
Name: Ellen G. Cooper
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Christopher Neczypor, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lincoln National Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a)
b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 22, 2024
/s/ Christopher Neczypor
Name: Christopher Neczypor
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lincoln National Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 22, 2024
/s/ Ellen G. Cooper
Name: Ellen G. Cooper
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required under Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lincoln National Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 22, 2024
/s/ Christopher Neczypor
Name: Christopher Neczypor
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required under Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
The following represents a five-year comparison of the annual performance of our cumulative total shareholder return (change in the
year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends), based on a hypothetical investment of $100 (invested on December 31, 2018, with
dividends reinvested through December 31, 2023), with the S&P 500® Index and the S&P Life & Health Insurance Index.
Lincoln National Corporation
S&P 500 Index
S&P Life & Health Insurance Index
$
2018
100.00
100.00
100.00
$
2019
117.94
131.49
123.18
$
As of December 31,
2021
2020
146.16
104.82
200.37
155.68
152.41
111.51
$
2022
2023
$
67.91
164.08
168.18
$
64.12
207.21
176.00
There can be no assurance that our stock performance will continue in the future with the same or similar trends depicted in the
preceding graph. We will not make or endorse any predictions as to future stock performance. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) rules, the Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return graph shall not be considered “soliciting material” or
to be “filed” with the SEC, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or
specifically incorporate such information by reference into a document filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Comparision of Five-Year Cumulative Total ReturnLincoln National CorporationS&P 500 IndexS&P Life & Health Insurance Index201820192020202120222023$–$50.00$100.00$150.00$200.00$250.00
Board of Directors
Deirdre P. Connelly
Retired President
North American Pharmaceuticals of GlaxoSmithKline
Ellen G. Cooper
Chairman, President and CEO
Lincoln National Corporation
William H. Cunningham
Professor
The University of Texas at Austin
Reginald E. Davis
Senior EVP and President of Banking
New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
Eric G. Johnson
CEO
Baldwin Richardson Foods Company
Gary C. Kelly
Executive Chairman
Southwest Airlines Co.
M. Leanne Lachman
President
Lachman Associates LLC
Dale LeFebvre
Founder and Chairman
3.5.7.11
Janet Liang
EVP, Group President and COO, Care Delivery
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Hospitals
Michael F. Mee
Retired EVP and CFO
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Owen Ryan
Chairman and Co-CEO
BlackLine, Inc.
Lynn M. Utter
Operating Partner
Atlas Holdings LLC
Corporate Headquarters
Lincoln National Corporation
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road
Radnor, PA 19087-5238
Internet Information
Information on LNC’s financial results and its products and services as well as SEC filings are available on our website at
www.lincolnfinancial.com.
Stock Listings
LNC’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol LNC.
LNC’s Series D depositary shares representing interests in its outstanding Series D preferred stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol LNC PRD.
Inquiries
Analysts and institutional investors should contact:
Tina Madon
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
Lincoln National Corporation
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road
Radnor, PA 19087
E-mail: investorrelations@LFG.com
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The 2024 annual meeting of shareholders will be held as a virtual-only meeting, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LNC2024, at 9:00
a.m. EDT on Thursday, May 23, 2024.
Shareholder Services
General inquiries or concerns about LNC shareholder services may be directed to shareholder services at 1-800-237-2920 or by email at
shareholderservices@LFG.com. Questions that are specific in nature, such as transfer of stock, change of address or general inquiries
regarding stock or dividend matters, should be directed to the transfer agent and registrar.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
For regular mailings use:
EQ Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64874
St. Paul, MN 55164-0874
1-866-541-9693
www.shareowneronline.com
For certified or overnight mailings use:
EQ Shareowner Services
1110 Centre Point Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dividend Reinvestment Program/Direct Stock Purchase Plan
LNC has a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Investment Plan. For further information, write to EQ Shareowner Services at the
addresses noted above.
Direct Deposit of Dividends
Quarterly dividends can be electronically deposited to shareholders’ checking or savings accounts on the dividend payment date.
Telephone inquiries may be directed to EQ Shareowner Services at 1-866-541-9693.
Common Stock Dividend Payment Schedule
Dividends on LNC common stock are paid on or about February 1, May 1, August 1 and November 1.
Lincoln Financial Group is a registered service mark of LNC.
©2024 Lincoln National Corporation
Lincoln National Corporation
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road
Radnor, PA 19087
Lincoln Financial Group is the
marketing name for Lincoln National
Corporation and its affiliates.
LincolnFinancial.com
AR-LNC-23