Liquidity Services provides clients with global coverage for their reverse supply chain needs. With 44 locations in 19 countries and buyers in nearly 200 countries and territories, we can manage, value, and sell your surplus assets virtually anywhere in the world. 2016 Annual Report Building a Better Future for Surplus United States New Castle, DE Anaheim, CA Atlanta, GA (2) East Brunswick, NJ Fontana, CA Fort Worth, TX Frisco, TX Garland, TX Groveport, OH Hayward, CA Houston, TX Lockbourne, OH Montgomery, AL Nashville, TN North Las Vegas, NV North Wilkesboro, NC Oklahoma City, OK Owings Mills, MD Plainfield, IN Scottsdale, AZ Washington, DC Argentina* Buenos Aires Australia Victoria *Locations of committed strategic partners Canada Brampton, ON China Hong Kong Shanghai Colombia* Bogota Costa Rica* Heredia Ecuador* Quito France Vanves Germany Munich Ireland* Dublin Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Peru* Surco South Korea* Seoul Philippines Muntinlupa City Spain Barcelona Singapore Singapore United Kingdom Birmingham Leeds London South Africa* Cape Town Johannesburg About Liquidity Services Liquidity Services (NASDAQ: LQDT) works with clients to ensure surplus is intelligently transformed from a burden into a liquid opportunity that fuels the achievement of strategic goals. Our superior service, unmatched scale, and ability to deliver results enable us to forge trusted, long-term relationships with over 9,000 clients, including Fortune 1000 and Global 500 organizations as well as government agencies. With over $6 billion in completed transactions, 3 million registered buyers, and reach into almost 200 countries and territories, we are the proven market leader in delivering smart surplus solutions. North America: 844.704.0367 Info@LiquidityServices.com Europe: 800.2007.0312 Asia Pacific: 800.1408.1960 LS0278_0117 LiquidityServices.com A LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS Fellow shareholders: Our business was founded to transform the underserved reverse supply chain market and create value for all constituencies – sellers, buyers, and our planet – by enabling the world to better manage surplus assets with transparency, compliance, and convenience. By making it easy for end users, entrepreneurs, and small businesses to securely connect with the millions of surplus and idle assets residing in the world’s supply chains, everybody wins. Another rewarding aspect of our business is its positive impact on the environment. In April we celebrated Earth Day’s 46th anniversary by recognizing how our global online marketplaces play a critical role in zero- waste initiatives. This year we eclipsed the cumulative sale of over 3 billion pounds of scrap material, diverting material that might have otherwise been destined for landfills. Indeed, our use of technology, robust marketplaces, valuation data, and integrated services has allowed our team to advance our mission and develop the leading reverse supply solution. Our tagline “A Better Future for Surplus” reinforces our purpose and in this Annual Report we celebrate how we are providing meaningful solutions to diverse clients across the $130 billion global reverse supply chain market. With 3 million registered buyers, a large and growing roster of blue-chip clients, and over $6 billion in gross merchandise volume (GMV) sold, Liquidity Services is the unrivaled leader in the reverse supply chain market, with unmatched expertise to intelligently manage, value, and sell assets. The breadth and liquidity of our marketplace was on display during FY16: • On behalf of over 9,000 clients we completed 574,000 transactions totaling $642 million in GMV. • Assets sold spanned approximately 500 individual asset categories in many key industry verticals, including: Energy, Government, Industrial, Retail, and Transportation. • Sales took place from client locations across North America, Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and South America. • Buyers hailed from around the globe and purchased assets in new, used, salvage, and scrap conditions. Our Strategy We are well positioned to serve any seller for virtually any asset type across every major industry sector. To further capture this large addressable market, we are focused on growing the size and scale of our global e-commerce solution to better serve and create enhanced value for retailers, manufacturers, and government agencies with the following key priorities: • Grow the volume transacted on our e-commerce platform in our core industry verticals with both large Global 5000 and small and middle market organizations; • Grow our market share by providing flexible service offerings and pricing models suited to individual client needs; • Provide full asset lifecycle solutions to leverage our marketplaces from initial purchase of new assets to final disposition of used assets; • Expand our ecosystem of partners who capture value by leveraging our e-commerce platform, buyer liquidity, and data; and • Execute our LiquidityOne transformation program to enable new functionality and greater efficiencies through the development of our new e-commerce platform, financial systems, and back office infrastructure. FY16 Results Our results for fiscal year 2016, while disappointing due to the impact of lower commodity prices and the transitioning of selected retail and Department of Defense (DoD) contracts, reflected our commitment to invest in our long-term strategy by expanding our service offerings, positioning our commercial marketplaces for accelerated growth, and focusing on our seller and buyer experience CORPORATE INFORMATION Executive Officers William P. Angrick, III CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors Jorge Celaya Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Leoncio Casusol Chief Information Officer Michael Sweeney Chief Accounting Officer James M. Rallo President, Retail Supply Chain Group Gardner Dudley President, Capital Assets Group Additional Information Roger Gravley President, GovDeals Mark Shaffer VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Mike Lutz Vice President, Human Resources Board of Directors William P. Angrick, III Chairman of the Board Phillip A. Clough Director George H. Ellis Director Patrick W. Gross Lead Director Beatriz Infante Director Edward J. Kolodzieski Director Director Jaime Mateus-Tique INVESTOR RELATIONS Julie Davis Senior Director of Investor Relations Phone: 202.558.6234 julie.davis@liquidityservices.com STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Computershare Trust Company, N.A. PO Box 43010 Providence, RI 02940-3010 Phone: 781.575.4238 www.computershare.com CORPORATE SECRETARY Mark Shaffer VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Ernst & Young LLP 8484 Westpark Drive McLean, VA, 22102 Phone: 703.747.1000 LiquidityServices.com through our LiquidityOne transformation strategy. The significant investments made in our LiquidityOne initiative and in expanding our sales organization had a dampening impact on 2016 earnings. However, we are confident in our strategy and in the positioning it will provide us in the market for the long term. buyers throughout the asset ownership lifecycle including the management, valuation, and sale of both new and used equipment. • We grew our liquidity position to support our growth strategy, exiting FY16 with cash of $134.5 million and zero financial debt. Looking Ahead As we begin to harvest the investments we are making in our people, processes, and platform over the next few years, we are excited about the tremendous potential to grow our business. We have firmly established ourselves as a premier provider in the global reverse supply chain market. We have developed an outstanding team of professionals dedicated to building and delivering innovative solutions that create value for our customers. Macro trends in globalization, the growth of e-commerce, and increased emphasis on sustainability will drive the need for our scalable, global solutions to manage reverse supply chain activities and B2B e-commerce more generally. Our strategic actions and investments will result in a more diversified, scalable business with more opportunities for growth and value creation for our long- term owners. Our entire team looks forward to working together this year to advance our market leadership and strategic plan, while maintaining the highest standards of integrity, service, and quality for our clients and buying customers. We thank our dedicated staff, clients, buyers, and shareholders for their trust and support in 2016 and in the years ahead. Sincerely, William P. Angrick We also made strong gains in several areas during the year, including: • Our GovDeals marketplace achieved record results fueled by growth in its seller base and expansion into the western region of the U.S. and Canada. • Our retail supply chain business expanded with numerous existing clients, added 10 new significant accounts during the year, and sharply grew its returns management and refurbishing services with the opening of a new flagship service center in Garland, TX as well as a redesign of our Las Vegas distribution center. • Our capital assets business expanded its client base and strategic partnerships within the energy vertical, which strengthened during the year, recording over 45% annual GMV growth in Q4-FY16. We also improved our market share by offering flexible pricing models and utilizing our global footprint to attract and serve both sellers and buyers of industrial assets. • We extended our relationship with the DoD with the award of an up to five year contract for the sale of virtually all DoD scrap materials generated in the U.S. • We leveraged our experience completing over 5.5 million B2B transactions to advance the development of our new LiquidityOne platform. This initiative builds on best practices and feedback from our customers to provide an enhanced marketplace for clients to safely and efficiently sell surplus - and for buyers to purchase an unmatched selection of business assets from the most recognizable sellers across the globe. • We expanded our offering with the launch of IronDirect, a new marketplace to address the $40 billion U.S. construction equipment market1 through a disruptive business model designed to unlock more value from the existing construction industry supply chain. We will serve this new market by supporting suppliers and 1 Statista Organizations Have Surplus. We Have Solutions. On average, 20% of an organization’s assets is surplus to its needs*, but most businesses struggle to manage this surplus effectively. Liquidity Services simplifies surplus with transparency and efficiency through proven management, valuation, and sales solutions, transforming our clients’ 20% surplus into 100% opportunity. *(Source: Investment Recovery Association) We Sell Any Surplus. In Any Condition. Anywhere in the World. With 3 million buyers across the globe and over $6 billion in completed transactions for clients, Liquidity Services provides the world’s largest marketplace for surplus across all asset categories and conditions. — C O R E VA L U E S — — F E AT U R E D T R A N S A C T I O N S — Surplus Management – Effective surplus management can save organizations millions through redeployment, cost avoidance, and efficiencies. We help clients simply and effectively manage surplus across their organization globally, handling every aspect of their programs from sale preparation and warehousing to compliance and fulfillment or removal. Valuation Services – Accurate, timely asset appraisals help organizations meet financial reporting needs, make asset management decisions, and facilitate events such as mergers and acquisitions. We have the experience and market data to deliver efficient valuations that achieve our clients’ goals. Sales Solutions – With a global network of 3 million buyers, we sell surplus quickly and for the highest possible return. Our clients can maximize buyer interest and recovery for their surplus through proven marketing and sales strategies, from email marketing and online advertising to private treaty sales and online auctions. DID YOU KNOW? The largest item by dollar figure we sold in fiscal year 2016 was a scanning electron microscope for nearly $4.2 million. CUSTOMER FOCUS INNOVATION Client and buyer satisfaction are key to our continued success. We seek to exceed our customers’ expectations every day. We continually seek out, develop, and implement new ideas to enhance our position as industry leader. — C A S E S T U D I E S — $70 Million for Multinational Energy Corporation • 15 year and counting partnership • 14 countries in which we’ve sold client surplus • Managed all aspects of program, from appraisal through removal Returns Management for Leading Consumer Brand • More than 400,000 returned goods processed and sold • $60 million original MSRP value of items sold • Reduced resources client needs for surplus management — W H AT O U R C L I E N T S S AY — “Liquidity Services executed the auction and collection process in a professional manner, completing it as planned and in the timeline requested with no issues. Liquidity Services’ team is top-notch and it was a great pleasure to work with them to successfully conclude this project.” $15 Million for Machine Tool Assets • 30,000 page views • 100 buyers • Assets sold and compliantly removed within tight six-month timeline $4 Million for Test & Measurement Assets • 187 bidders from 25 countries across four continents • $600,000 over recovery expectation • 100,00 page views and 4,000 total bids for 300 assets — C A S E S T U D Y — Five-Year Global Partnership with Construction and Civil Engineering Company • $6.3 million and counting in recovery • Over 3,300 assets sold • Projects executed across eight locations in four countries — W H AT O U R C L I E N T S S AY — DID YOU KNOW? “The people, the service, the relationship that is built on trust make it a partnership. If the folks at Liquidity Services say something, I believe it… nothing’s going to come up that we can’t work through.” Ian Colvin, Project Manager at BAE Systems Leading Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Company Our marketplaces are segmented by industry – including energy, government, industrial, retail, and transportation – and achieved a combined 13 million visitors and over 150 million page views. With our unparalleled marketplace for surplus, proven multichannel marketing and sales strategies, and services that span the spectrum of asset management from buyer vetting to asset removal, we generate the highest recovery for clients while minimizing risk and resource use. Global Marketplaces segmented by industry 13 million visitors annually Over 150 million page views Unique items we sold this past fiscal year included: • Bell Helicopter • Personal 3D Printers • Metalworking & Fabrication Facility Organizations Have Surplus. We Have Solutions. On average, 20% of an organization’s assets is surplus to its needs*, but most businesses struggle to manage this surplus effectively. Liquidity Services simplifies surplus with transparency and efficiency through proven management, valuation, and sales solutions, transforming our clients’ 20% surplus into 100% opportunity. *(Source: Investment Recovery Association) We Sell Any Surplus. In Any Condition. Anywhere in the World. With 3 million buyers across the globe and over $6 billion in completed transactions for clients, Liquidity Services provides the world’s largest marketplace for surplus across all asset categories and conditions. — C O R E VA L U E S — — F E AT U R E D T R A N S A C T I O N S — Surplus Management – Effective surplus management can save organizations millions through redeployment, cost avoidance, and efficiencies. We help clients simply and effectively manage surplus across their organization globally, handling every aspect of their programs from sale preparation and warehousing to compliance and fulfillment or removal. Valuation Services – Accurate, timely asset appraisals help organizations meet financial reporting needs, make asset management decisions, and facilitate events such as mergers and acquisitions. We have the experience and market data to deliver efficient valuations that achieve our clients’ goals. Sales Solutions – With a global network of 3 million buyers, we sell surplus quickly and for the highest possible return. Our clients can maximize buyer interest and recovery for their surplus through proven marketing and sales strategies, from email marketing and online advertising to private treaty sales and online auctions. DID YOU KNOW? The largest item by dollar figure we sold in fiscal year 2016 was a scanning electron microscope for nearly $4.2 million. CUSTOMER FOCUS INNOVATION Client and buyer satisfaction are key to our continued success. We seek to exceed our customers’ expectations every day. We continually seek out, develop, and implement new ideas to enhance our position as industry leader. — C A S E S T U D I E S — $70 Million for Multinational Energy Corporation • 15 year and counting partnership • 14 countries in which we’ve sold client surplus • Managed all aspects of program, from appraisal through removal Returns Management for Leading Consumer Brand • More than 400,000 returned goods processed and sold • $60 million original MSRP value of items sold • Reduced resources client needs for surplus management — W H AT O U R C L I E N T S S AY — “Liquidity Services executed the auction and collection process in a professional manner, completing it as planned and in the timeline requested with no issues. Liquidity Services’ team is top-notch and it was a great pleasure to work with them to successfully conclude this project.” $15 Million for Machine Tool Assets • 30,000 page views • 100 buyers • Assets sold and compliantly removed within tight six-month timeline $4 Million for Test & Measurement Assets • 187 bidders from 25 countries across four continents • $600,000 over recovery expectation • 100,00 page views and 4,000 total bids for 300 assets — C A S E S T U D Y — Five-Year Global Partnership with Construction and Civil Engineering Company • $6.3 million and counting in recovery • Over 3,300 assets sold • Projects executed across eight locations in four countries — W H AT O U R C L I E N T S S AY — DID YOU KNOW? “The people, the service, the relationship that is built on trust make it a partnership. If the folks at Liquidity Services say something, I believe it… nothing’s going to come up that we can’t work through.” Ian Colvin, Project Manager at BAE Systems Leading Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Company Our marketplaces are segmented by industry – including energy, government, industrial, retail, and transportation – and achieved a combined 13 million visitors and over 150 million page views. With our unparalleled marketplace for surplus, proven multichannel marketing and sales strategies, and services that span the spectrum of asset management from buyer vetting to asset removal, we generate the highest recovery for clients while minimizing risk and resource use. Global Marketplaces segmented by industry 13 million visitors annually Over 150 million page views Unique items we sold this past fiscal year included: • Bell Helicopter • Personal 3D Printers • Metalworking & Fabrication Facility Fiscal Year 2016: Our Success by the NumbersWould You Pay $8,000 for a Tilt-A-Whirl?One of our buyers did! In April, they purchased this item from the city of North Little Rock, Arkansas through our GovDeals marketplace.— CASE STUDY —Thirteen-Year Partnership with Leading Food Company• Thirteen years and counting of partnership• Millions of dollars in ROI generated• Thousands of surplus vehicles sold• 25,000 vehicles managed— WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY —“Liquidity Services is very professional in the service provided. Follows up very closely to expedite the sales and also managed to get a very good offer for the sales of our scraps.”Logistics Manager, Multinational Oil & Gas CorporationEMPLOYED NEARLY1,000 PEOPLE ACROSS 44 LOCATIONSIN 19 COUNTRIESSOLD ASSETS AND INVENTORY SPANNING500 categoriesIN ALL KEY INDUSTRY VERTICALS INCLUDING ENERGY, GOVERNMENT, DIVERSIFIED MANUFACTURING, RETAIL, AND TRANSPORTATIONCOMPLETED574,000TRANSACTIONS TOTALING$642 millionIN SALES FOR OVER9,000CLIENTSCONDUCTED SALES ACROSS46 countriesON SIX CONTINENTSWORLDWIDEREACHED BUYERS FROM OVER200 COUNTRIES UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) (cid:2) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FORM 10-K For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 OR (cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-51813 LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 1920 L Street, N.W., 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 52-2209244 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 20036 (Zip Code) (202) 467-6868 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.001 per share Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One): Large accelerated filer (cid:3) Non-accelerated filer (cid:3) Smaller reporting company (cid:3) Accelerated filer (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2) Aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 31, 2016 based upon the closing price of the common stock as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market on such date, was approximately $127,314,180. The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, as of November 17, 2016 was 31,288,551. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting, to be filed subsequently, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Description PART I Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplemental Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 17 35 36 36 37 38 39 43 61 61 61 62 64 65 65 65 65 65 Item 1. 1A. 1B. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 7A. 8. 9. 9A. 9B. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15. Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 107 PART IV Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ the ‘‘Company’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to Liquidity Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Item 1. Business. Overview PART I We employ innovative e-commerce marketplace solutions to manage, value, and sell inventory and equipment for business and government clients. We operate a network of leading e-commerce marketplaces that enable buyers and sellers to transact in an efficient, automated environment offering over 500 product categories. The Company’s marketplaces provide professional buyers access to a global, organized supply of new, surplus, and scrap assets presented with digital images and other relevant product information. Additionally, the Company enables its corporate and government sellers to enhance their financial return on assets offered for sale by providing a liquid marketplace and value- added services that encompass the consultative management, valuation, and sale of surplus assets. Our broad range of services include program management, valuation, asset management, reconciliation, RTV and RMA (‘‘Return to Vendor’’ and ‘‘Returns Management Authorization’’), refurbishment and recycling, fulfillment, marketing and sales, warehousing and transportation, buyer customer support, and compliance and risk mitigation. We organize the products on our marketplaces into categories across major industry verticals such as consumer electronics, general merchandise, apparel, scientific equipment, aerospace parts and equipment, technology hardware, energy equipment, industrial capital assets, fleet and transportation equipment and specialty equipment. Our network of marketplaces includes: www.liquidation.com, www.govliquidation.com, www.govdeals.com, www.networkintl.com, www.truckcenter.com, www.secondipity.com, www.unclesamsretailoutlet.com, www.go-dove.com, and www.irondirect.com. We have over 8,000 clients, including Fortune 1000 and Global 500 organizations as well as government agencies. The Company has one reportable segment consisting of an aggregation of five operating segments that manage e-commerce marketplaces for sellers and buyers of new, surplus, and scrap assets. We believe our ability to create liquid marketplaces for surplus and salvage assets generates a continuing flow of goods from our corporate and government sellers. This valuable and reliable flow of goods in turn attracts an increasing number of professional buyers to our marketplaces. During fiscal year 2016, the number of registered buyers grew from approximately 2,845,000 to approximately 2,986,000, or 5.0%. During the past three fiscal years, we have conducted over 1,688,000 online transactions generating approximately $2.4 billion in gross merchandise volume or GMV. We believe the continuing flow of goods in our marketplaces attracts a growing buyer base which creates a self-sustaining cycle for our buyers and sellers. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we generated GMV of $642.1 million and revenue of $316.5 million through multiple sources, including transaction fees from sellers and buyers, revenue sharing arrangements, value-added service charges and online advertising fees. Our GMV has grown at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 14% since fiscal year 2006. We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1999 as Liquidation.com, Inc. and commenced operations in early 2000. Industry Overview While a well-established forward supply chain exists for the procurement of assets, most manufacturers, retailers, corporations and government agencies have not made significant investments in their reverse supply chain process or systems. The reverse supply chain addresses the redeployment 1 and remarketing of surplus and salvage assets. These assets generally consist of retail customer returns, overstock products and end-of-life goods or capital assets from both the corporate and government sectors. The market is large, as indicated by a National Retail Federation (NRF) report in November 2015 that $260.5 billion of merchandise is returned on an annual basis. According to a May 2015 report by the retail analyst firm IHL Group, retailers worldwide lose $1.75 trillion annually due to the cost of overstocks, out-of-stocks and needless returns. Additionally, the Investment Recovery Association, a professional association for managers of surplus assets, reports on its website that at any given time, almost 20% of a typical organization’s capital assets are surplus to its needs. The supply of surplus and salvage assets in the reverse supply chain results from a number of factors, including: (cid:129) Supply chain inefficiencies. Forecasting inaccuracies, manufacturer overruns, cancelled orders, evolving market preferences, discontinued product lines, merchandise packaging changes and seasonal fluctuations result in the growth of surplus assets. (cid:129) Product innovation. Continuous innovation in technology products, such as computer and office equipment, consumer electronics, and personal communication and entertainment devices, results in a continuous flow of surplus assets. (cid:129) Return policies of large national and online retailers. The flexible return practices of many large national retailers and online shopping sites result in a continuous supply of returned merchandise, a significant portion of which must be liquidated. The NRF from November 2015 reports that approximately 8% of all merchandise purchases are returned. (cid:129) Compliance with government regulations. An increasingly stringent regulatory environment necessitates the verifiable recycling and remarketing of surplus assets that would otherwise be disposed of as waste. (cid:129) Increasing focus by corporate and government agencies to seek green solutions for surplus assets. Most organizations appreciate the growing need to be environmentally friendly by improving their management of end of life or surplus goods, including creating the need to repurpose or efficiently redistribute surplus and capital assets to minimize waste and maximize value for themselves and the communities they serve. (cid:129) Changing budgetary trends in corporate and governmental entities. As corporate and governmental entities increasingly are being pressured to enhance efficiencies, while utilizing less resources, surplus and salvage capital assets become a source of funds once liquidated. Organizations that manufacture, distribute, sell or use finished goods regularly need to dispose of excess inventory or returned merchandise. We believe the management and remarketing of surplus assets traditionally has been an inefficient process. While many organizations spend considerable resources developing systems and channels supporting the flow of finished goods to their core customers, we believe that many have not historically dedicated significant resources to the reverse supply chain. Factors contributing to these inefficiencies in the reverse supply chain include the lack of: (cid:129) a centralized and global marketplace to sell bulk products in the reverse supply chain; (cid:129) awareness of effective methods and mechanisms for disposal of surplus assets; (cid:129) experience in managing the reverse supply chain to seek optimal net returns and improve gross margins; and (cid:129) real time market data on surplus assets as they move through the final steps of the product life cycle. 2 Traditional methods of surplus and salvage asset disposition include ad-hoc, negotiated direct sales, utilization of individual brokers or sales agents and live on-site auctions. We believe these solutions are generally highly fragmented, geographically dispersed and poorly integrated with supply chain operations. The manual, negotiated and geographically dispersed nature of traditional surplus resale methods results in a lack of pricing transparency for offered goods, multiple brokers/parties ultimately involved in the final disposition and a lower number of potential buyers and bids, which we believe typically leads to lower recovery for sellers. A significant number of professional buyers seek surplus and salvage assets to sustain their operations and meet demands of end-customers. They include online and offline retailers, convenience and discount stores, value-added resellers such as refurbishers and scrap recyclers, import and export firms, and small businesses. Traditionally, these buyers have had limited access to a reliable flow of surplus goods and assets, relying instead on their own network of industry contacts and fixed-site auctioneers to locate, evaluate and purchase specific items of interest. Traditional methods are inefficient for buyers due to the lack of: (cid:129) global access to an available continuous supply of desired goods and assets; (cid:129) efficient and inexpensive sourcing processes; (cid:129) a professionally managed central marketplace with transparent, high quality services; (cid:129) detailed information and product description for the offered goods; and (cid:129) pricing transparency or ability to compare asset prices. The Internet is a global medium enabling millions of people worldwide to share information, communicate and conduct business electronically. Strong growth has occurred in the business-to-business (B2B) online retail market, which can be attributed to the rapid migration of manufacturers and wholesalers to open, online platforms. This continued evolution toward ubiquitous B2B platforms that enable sellers and buyers to interact with each other anywhere in the world, totaled $855 billion in total B2B e-commerce sales in the United States in 2016, led by the industrials sector which is on pace to grow 2016 sales by 8% to $246.5 billion (Source: Forrester Research Inc.). Forrester also anticipates that B2B e-commerce sales will reach $1.1 trillion by 2020, a compound average growth rate of 7.7% since 2014. We believe professional buyers of surplus and salvage assets will increasingly use these B2B platforms to identify and source goods available for immediate online purchase. Our Solution Our solution is comprised of ecommerce marketplaces and value-added services. Our marketplaces and services are designed to provide sellers a comprehensive solution to quickly bring surplus assets to market and enhance the financial value realized from the sale of their surplus assets while providing buyers with confidence in the reliable flow of goods they purchase. We provide our sellers access to a network of liquid marketplaces with over 2.9 million professional buyers and a suite of services including consultative surplus asset management, valuation, sales solutions, and logistics capabilities to efficiently manage our clients’ reverse supply chain and maximize total supply chain value. We also seek the optimal methods to maximize our clients’ net recovery using channel strategies and dedicated programs to deliver transparent, sustained value. Through our relationships with sellers, we provide buyers convenient access to a substantial and continuous flow of surplus and salvage assets. We provide buyers with products in over 500 categories in lot sizes ranging from full truck loads to pallets, packages and individual items. Our solution combines leading ecommerce marketplaces with a full suite of integrated sales, marketing, merchandising, fulfillment, payment collection, customer support, dispute mediation and logistics 3 services. We provide buyers a convenient method for sourcing surplus consumer goods and commercial capital assets including, industrial equipment, energy equipment, and transportation assets. For any given asset, buyers have access to a detailed product description, product manifest, digital images of a product, relevant transaction history regarding the seller, shipping weights, product dimensions and estimated shipping costs to the buyer’s location. This enables our solutions to become the primary source for surplus and salvage assets for many of our professional buyers and end-users. We believe our marketplaces benefit over time from greater scale and adoption by our constituents creating a virtual cycle for our buyers and sellers. As of September 30, 2016, we had aggregated approximately 2,986,000 registered buyers in our marketplaces and access to millions of end-users through a range of existing consumer marketplaces. Aggregating this level of buyer demand and market data enables us to generate a continuous flow of goods from corporate and government sellers, which in turn attracts an increasing number of professional buyers. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 we had over 2,417,000 auction participants in our online auctions from our registered buyers. During fiscal year 2016, we grew our registered buyer base by 5.0% or approximately 141,000. As buyers continue to discover and use our ecommerce marketplaces as an effective method to source assets, we believe our solutions become an increasingly attractive sales channel for corporate and government agency sellers. We believe this self-reinforcing cycle results in greater transaction volume and enhances the value of our marketplaces. Competitive Factors We have created liquid marketplaces for virtually any type, quantity or condition of surplus or salvage assets. The strengths of our business model include: Aggregation of supply and demand for surplus and salvage assets Our ability to aggregate sellers and buyers through our marketplaces is a fundamental strength of our business model. Sellers benefit from a liquid, transparent market and the active participation of our large base of professional buyers, which enhances returns. Buyers benefit from our relationships with high-volume, corporate and government sellers, which provides them with continuous access to a comprehensive selection of surplus and salvage assets. Our solution eliminates the need for sellers and buyers to rely on the highly fragmented and geographically dispersed group of traditional liquidators. Instead, sellers and buyers conveniently access our ecommerce marketplaces for their entire surplus and salvage asset needs. Integrated and comprehensive solution Our marketplaces are designed to provide sellers and buyers with a comprehensive solution for the online sale and purchase of surplus and salvage assets. We offer a full suite of value-added services to simplify the sales and supply chain processes for sellers and improve the utility of our marketplaces for buyers. For corporate and government sellers, we provide sales, marketing, logistics and customer support services that are fully integrated with our marketplaces, creating operational and system efficiencies. For many of these sellers, asset disposition is not a core business function to which they desire to dedicate internal resources. With our solution, we manage each step of the transaction and supply chain for our sellers reducing complexity while providing the ability to optimize the client’s net financial return in the sale of surplus goods and assets. Sellers simply make goods available at their facilities or deliver them to our distribution centers and we deliver the profits after the sale is completed. Our buyer services include intelligent alerts, search tools, dynamic pricing, shipping and delivery, secure settlement, live customer support and dispute resolution to enable the most effective methods to source assets for their businesses. 4 Flexible and aligned transaction model We offer three primary transaction models to our sellers: purchase, consignment and profit-sharing. Under these models, our compensation is derived from either the gross or net proceeds received from the sale of the assets. Our consignment and profit-sharing arrangements are designed to maximize returns by aligning our economic interests with those of our sellers. Faster transaction cycle times for our sellers and buyers We believe our marketplace solutions allow sellers to complete the entire sales process more rapidly than through other liquidation methods by generally reducing the complexities in the reverse supply chain and utilizing our multi-channel strategies to optimize recovery and velocity. As a result, sellers are able to reduce surplus or less valuable inventory quickly, generate additional working capital and reduce the cost of carrying unwanted assets. We provide a one stop solution to enable professional buyers of any size throughout the world to purchase assets in an efficient manner. For these buyers, we provide a broad range of services to give them the information necessary to make an informed bid and ensure they quickly and efficiently receive the goods purchased. Solutions that promote sustainability and green solutions for improved corporate/government stewardship Our solutions provide a range of capabilities that enable corporate and government agencies to directly reduce the amount of waste generated by redistributing end-of-life products or assets, through our solutions, improving the net financial recovery generated while positively impacting the communities they serve. Some of the world’s largest forward thinking corporations and government agencies have significantly enhanced their stewardship of communities and the environment by partnering with us. Our Strategy The focus of our growth strategy is to provide commercial, municipal government, and federal agency clients and buying customers the world’s most transparent, innovative and effective ecommerce marketplaces and integrated services for surplus assets. Our business has already attracted nearly 3.0 million registered buyers and achieved over $642 million of gross merchandise volume in fiscal year 2016 and is well positioned to serve any seller for virtually any asset type in every industry sector. Our goal is to develop a multi-billion dollar business through organic growth by expanding our platform to a diversified base of Fortune 1000 corporations, municipal agencies and small and medium size businesses that can benefit from our global marketplace, buyer liquidity and integrated services. The key elements of our growth strategy are to: Intensify Supply and Demand in our core vertical markets We intend to increase the active buyer participation within our consumer goods, commercial capital assets (energy, industrial, transportation and other markets), and municipal government marketplaces, by attracting new buyers and more deeply penetrating our base of existing professional buyers. We intend to attract new buyers by using a variety of online and traditional marketing programs while improving the services and experience for our valued professional buyers. In addition, we plan to use the comprehensive buyer profiles, preferences and transactional data we have compiled over the last 17 years to enable us to identify and market highly relevant assets available through our marketplaces to the most likely buyers. We believe these initiatives will help us to increase the total number of auction participants and increase loyalty among our buyer base. In turn, increased buyer participation within our marketplaces should enable us to sell higher volumes of surplus assets, expand into new vertical markets, and maintain high recovery values for our selling clients. 5 Increase value and services for sellers We intend to build upon our client base of the world’s largest retailers and manufacturers, thousands of municipal clients and our expertise with the Department of Defense (‘‘DoD’’) to attract additional corporate and government sellers to our marketplaces. The majority of corporations and government agencies still rely on inefficient, traditional, and less transparent disposition methods for their surplus assets. To help more organizations address these inefficiencies, we plan to extend our platform to new partners, including dealers, auctioneers and refurbishers, who would benefit from accessing our marketplaces, leveraging our global buyer base, and relying on our service offerings, including dealers, auctioneers, refurbishers, and other principals. We also intend to partner with our seller base to address inefficient markets and practices in the forward supply chain of select industries, such as construction equipment, through our IronDirect marketplace, to provide a full lifecycle solution from initial purchase to disposition. By addressing inefficiencies in forward supply chain markets and bundling solutions with our core reverse supply chain services, we anticipate that we will increase our base of buyers and sellers and handle higher volumes of surplus in the industries we serve. Develop new relationships and expand our solution to the full supply chain life cycle We intend to build upon our client base of the world’s largest retailers and manufacturers, thousands of municipal clients and our expertise with the DoD to attract additional corporate and government sellers to our marketplaces. The majority of corporations and government agencies still rely on inefficient, traditional, and less transparent disposition methods for their surplus assets. To further our reach in helping organizations address these inefficiencies, we will extend our platform to partners who would benefit from accessing our marketplace, leveraging our global buyer base, and tapping into our service offerings, including dealers, auctioneers, refurbishers, and other principals. We will also partner with our seller base to address and disrupt inefficient markets and practices in the forward supply chain of select industries, such as construction equipment through our IronDirect marketplace, to provide a full lifecycle solution from initial purchase to disposition. By addressing inefficiencies in forward supply chain markets and bundling solutions with our core reverse supply chain services, we anticipate that we would increase our entry points with both buyers and sellers to handle higher volumes of surplus in the industries we serve. Innovation and technology development Currently our marketplaces operate on separate platforms. Pursuant to our LiquidityOne Transformation initiative, we are creating a single integrated platform to support customer management, property management, transaction management, and financial and human capital management across all of our marketplaces. This initiative is designed to implement a uniform set of best practices across our entire business and to provide a superior customer experience by making more personalized tools and services available to our buyers and sellers. Upgraded features on our e-commerce platform and enhancements to our multi-channel optimization capabilities made as part of this initiative have already improved our business and we expect that the efficiencies and operating leverage created by LiquidityOne will drive profitability, including by enabling us to be more competitive in pricing new client programs. The LiquidityOne program will further automate our global solution and leverage the scalability of our technology investments across all of our marketplaces, including multi-currency and multi-lingual solutions. In addition to enhancing the features, experience, and services available for our buyers and sellers, we seek to leverage the increasing insight we gain with each transaction to enhance the recovery value clients realize along with improving the relevancy for our buyers in the reverse supply chain. The LiquidityOne Transformation initiative will also simplify and streamline our operations, improve the functionality of our systems support, and decrease the cost of our systems infrastructure. 6 Our Marketplaces Our ecommerce marketplaces serve as an efficient and convenient method for the sale of surplus and salvage consumer goods and capital assets. They are designed to address the particular requirements and needs of buyers and sellers. We operate and enable several marketplaces, including the following: (cid:129) Our www.liquidation.com marketplace enables corporations located in the United States to sell surplus and salvage consumer goods and capital assets. This leading business to business marketplace and our related value-added services are designed to meet the needs of clients by selling their surplus assets to domestic and international buyers. (cid:129) Our www.govliquidation.com marketplace enables selected federal government agencies as well as commercial businesses to sell surplus and scrap assets. In addition to goods sold on behalf of other federal agencies, the surplus and scrap assets we sell as the exclusive contractor of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposition Services of the U.S. Department of Defense are sold in this marketplace. To satisfy the requirements of U.S. federal government agency sellers, this marketplace incorporates additional terms and conditions of sale, such as U.S. Trade Security Controls clearance for the sale of export-controlled property. (cid:129) Our www.govdeals.com marketplace enables local and state government entities including city, county and state agencies as well as school boards and public utilities located in the United States to sell surplus and salvage assets. This marketplace and our related services are designed to meet the unique needs of public sector clients selling to domestic and international buyers. (cid:129) Our www.networkintl.com marketplace enables corporations to sell idle, surplus, and scrap equipment in the oil and gas, petrochemical and power generation industries. This marketplace and our related services are designed to meet the unique needs of energy sector clients. (cid:129) Our www.go-dove.com marketplace enables corporations located in the United States, Europe, and Asia to sell manufacturing surplus and salvage capital assets. This marketplace and our related services are designed to meet the specific needs of manufacturing sector clients by selling their surplus assets to domestic and international buyers. (cid:129) Our www.truckcenter.com marketplace enables corporations located in the United States to sell surplus and salvage transportation assets. This marketplace and our related services are designed to meet the specific needs of companies and financial institutions by selling their surplus transportation assets to domestic and international buyers. During fiscal year 2016, TruckCenter also began selling trucks through its newly created Retail channel, primarily to Owner Operators and small fleets. (cid:129) Our www.irondirect.com marketplace enables buyers to purchase value-priced equipment, attachments, parts and services from proven global manufacturers of construction equipment. IronDirect allows companies to consider the full life cycle of their equipment and the value that accrues through proper fleet management. In addition to these leading business-to-business marketplaces, we recognize the need to reach end users for some of the assets our clients have entrusted to us. Thus, we have developed the capability to sell products on our client’s behalf directly to end-users and/or consumers using a range of existing marketplaces. Our www.secondipity.com marketplace provides consumers a trusted source of value products through a socially conscious online experience designed to provide ‘‘Better Value, Better Life,’’ through donating a portion of the proceeds of every sale to charity. Our Uncle Sam’s Retail Outlet website uses a business-to-consumer model to sell surplus military goods. We also have an established global buyer base that seeks to buy in larger quantities than are offered through our standard auction platform. Thus, we have dedicated sales teams to support their needs and supply 7 chain. These range from a single truckload to ongoing flows for export anywhere in the world, where we market, handle, and support the full transaction on behalf of our buyers. We expect to continue to meet the needs of our clients and to access a growing range of products for all our buyers by enabling our multi-channel strategy to ensure we create the greatest value for assets at the end of their initial product life cycle. Our Value-Added Services for Buyers and Sellers We have integrated value-added services to simplify the reverse supply chain processes for our buyers and sellers. We believe these services create the greatest operational efficiencies within this element of the supply chain enabling the greatest value for sellers and buyers with the highest level of confidence and transparency in the services we provide. Additionally, we believe these services improve compliance with the various policies, regulations and sale restrictions of our corporate and government sellers while supporting, or greatly enhancing, many corporate or government environmental initiatives. Seller services. We offer value-added services to sellers in three areas: (1) merchandising and channel optimization, (2) logistics and (3) settlement and customer support, including compliance services. (cid:129) Merchandising and Channel Optimization efforts encompass all of the services necessary to prepare merchandise for a successful auction and include the following: (cid:129) Channel Optimization—we determine the marketplace and channel sales strategy that creates the greatest value for the individual asset using our real time transaction systems and proprietary data to support ongoing optimization. (cid:129) Marketing and promotion—we use a variety of both online and traditional marketing methods to promote our sellers’ merchandise and generate the greatest interest in each asset. (cid:129) Asset lotting and merchandising—we leverage our industry experience to organize the merchandise we receive into size and product combinations that meet buyer preferences within each marketplace and channel. (cid:129) Product information enhancement—we provide digital images of the merchandise to be sold and combine the images with relevant information. In order to increase the realized sales value, we also research, collect and use supplemental product information to enhance product descriptions. (cid:129) Logistics. We provide logistics services designed to support the receipt, handling, transportation and tracking of merchandise offered through our marketplaces, including the following: (cid:129) Distribution centers—we provide sellers with the flexibility of either having us manage the sales process at their location or delivering merchandise to one of our distribution centers. (cid:129) Inventory management—sellers benefit from our management and inventory tracking system designed so that merchandise is received, processed and delivered in a timely manner. (cid:129) Cataloguing merchandise—we catalogue all merchandise, which enables us to provide useful product information to buyers and sellers. In certain circumstances, we will inspect the merchandise and provide condition descriptions to improve quality and the financial recovery to the client. (cid:129) Testing, data wiping, de-labeling and refurbishment—we test products, wipe electronic data, refurbish and remove labels and product markings from merchandise prior to sale in order to add value to the asset and protect sellers’ brand equity and distribution relationships. 8 (cid:129) Return to vendor or product disposition to non-sales channels—we will manage the end-to- end processes for our clients ensuring that returned merchandise is disposed through a variety of disposition requirements including the end-to-end management of returning products to vendors, charities, or channels outside of our leading marketplace solutions. (cid:129) Outbound fulfillment—we can arrange for domestic or international shipping for all merchandise, whether it’s a small item or container load for export located in one of our distribution centers or at a seller’s facility. (cid:129) Settlement and customer support. Settlement and customer support services are designed for successful and reliable completion of transactions and include: (cid:129) Buyer qualification—we qualify buyers to ensure their compliance with applicable government or seller mandated terms of sale, as well as to confirm their ability to complete a transaction. (cid:129) Collection and settlement—we collect payments on behalf of sellers prior to delivery of any merchandise and disburse the profits to the seller after the satisfaction of all conditions of a sale. (cid:129) Transaction tracking and reporting—we enable sellers and buyers to track and monitor the status of their transactions throughout the sales process. We support the successful completion of each transaction on behalf of the buyer and seller. We provide a range of comprehensive reporting services to sellers upon the completion of a transaction. Our invoicing and reporting tools can be integrated with the seller’s information system, providing a more efficient flow of data. (cid:129) Customer support and dispute resolution—we provide full customer support throughout the transaction process and dispute resolution for our customers if needed. Buyer services. Many of the services we provide to sellers also benefit buyers by providing them with the information necessary to make a more informed bid and by delivering the goods they purchased. Our buyer-focused services include the following: (cid:129) Intelligent alerts and recommendations—we notify buyers of upcoming auctions based on their registered preferences and prior transaction history. Registered preferences can be as broad as a product category or as specific as a part number or key word. We use this information to ensure informed recommendations whenever we identify a product that fits a buyer’s preference. We will alert our buyers based on their preferences when auctions are initially launched or nearing conclusion and based on various other parameters to enable our buyers to see the most relevant products. (cid:129) Search and navigation tools—buyers can search our marketplaces for products based on a variety of criteria and personalized settings, including product category, keyword, lot size, product condition, product geographic location and auction ending date. (cid:129) Dynamic pricing tools, product information, and shipping quotes—we offer multiple dynamic pricing tools including outbid notification, automated bid agent and automatic auction extension. In addition, we provide buyers the information they need to make informed decisions, including product data, seller performance, and online shipping quotes to help understand their landed cost. (cid:129) Broad and flexible range of shipping/pick-up options—we can provide packaging and shipping services for each transaction, whether it is a small item or container loads for export, including buyer pick-up at our premises, for the majority of transactions, or support of buyer arranged transportation. We support the most efficient solution for each transaction and each buyer. 9 (cid:129) Secure settlement and customer support—in addition to qualifying sellers, providing several electronic payment options and serving as a trusted market intermediary, we verify transaction completion, which in turn enhances buyer confidence. In addition, we provide full reliable customer support throughout the transaction process. Sales and Marketing We utilize a direct sales and marketing force to acquire and manage our seller and buyer accounts. As of September 30, 2016, we had 120 sales and marketing personnel. Our sales activities are focused primarily on acquiring new sellers and improving the value of our solutions to existing sellers. Our marketing activities are focused primarily on acquiring and activating new buyers and increasing existing buyer participation. Our marketing team also manages our Liquidity Services and marketplace brands as well as driving lead generation efforts that support the sales team. Sales Our sales personnel develop seller relationships, establish agreements to provide our services and manage the business accounts on an on-going basis. Our sales team focuses on building long-term relationships with sellers that we believe will generate recurring transactions. They also leverage our years of experience and market data of completed transactions to identify which of our various services would be beneficial to each new or existing seller. Our sales group is organized to serve three distinct groups of sellers: large corporate accounts, medium to small corporate accounts and government accounts. This approach is based on our experience in understanding and serving the unique needs of each type of seller: (cid:129) Large corporate sellers. These sellers require a customized approach, using a combination of our industry-focused sales team and our value-added services to create a comprehensive solution. (cid:129) Medium to small corporate sellers. These sellers are offered a turn-key solution enabling them to self-serve in our marketplaces by accessing tools and resources to optimize their internal processes and net recovery. (cid:129) Government sellers. These sellers require a customized approach. Sales efforts are both pro-active and re-active, including responding to already structured contract proposal requests and assisting government agencies in developing the appropriate scope of work to serve their needs. Our sales personnel receive a salary and performance-based commissions. Marketing We use a variety of online and traditional marketing strategies to attract and activate professional buyers to maximize the number of bidders participating in our ecommerce marketplaces as well as to support our sales team: (cid:129) Buyer acquisition. We utilize sophisticated marketing automation and digital online marketing, including paid search advertising, search engine optimization, affiliate programs and cross promotion on all of our marketplaces to acquire new buyers. We supplement this online marketing with special event print media, classified advertisements and selected direct mail campaigns. Public relations campaigns, participation in trade shows and speaking engagements also complement our overall buyer acquisition efforts. (cid:129) Buyer participation. We use a variety of tools to increase buyer participation, including: targeted opt-in e-mail newsletters that rely on the buyer’s stated categories of interest and past bidding or transaction activity; special e-mail alerts highlighting specific products of interest; personalized 10 recommendation engines; and convenient search tools that enable a buyer or prospective buyer to find desired items on our ecommerce marketplaces. (cid:129) Market research. In order to better target buyers by industry segment, geographic location or other criteria, our marketing department continually gathers data and information from each of the buyer segments we serve. In addition, the marketing department conducts regular surveys to better understand buyers’ behavior and needs. We have a privacy policy and have implemented security measures to protect this information. (cid:129) Sales support. Our marketing department has a robust lead generation program, creates supporting documentation and research to support our sales team in presenting our company to potential sellers and buyers, including sales brochures, white papers and participation in selected trade shows. All marketing activities are evaluated based on the level of auction participation in our marketplaces, the cost to acquire new sellers, and the cost effectiveness of each action. Technology and Infrastructure Our marketplaces are fully web-based and can be accessed from any Internet-enabled device by using a standard web browser. Our technology systems enable us to automate and streamline many of the manual processes associated with finding, evaluating, bidding on, paying for and shipping surplus and salvage assets. The technology and content behind our marketplaces and integrated value-added services were developed in-house by full-time employees, providing us with control over the marketplaces and the ability to make rapid enhancements to better fit the specific needs of our business and customers. Our marketplaces are supported by a common database architecture and a shared system application. This infrastructure provides: (cid:129) an efficient channel to sell online through a variety of pricing mechanisms (standard auction, sealed bid, Dutch auction and fixed price); (cid:129) a scalable back office that enables buyers and sellers to efficiently manage transactions among remote business users by utilizing account management tools, including payment collection, invoicing management, shipping and transaction settlement; and (cid:129) an input/output agnostic platform, including Application Programming Interface (APIs) or other conduits that enable us to integrate seamlessly with partner enterprise applications of sellers and third party service providers. We have designed our websites and supporting infrastructure to be highly robust and to support new services and increased traffic. Our servers are fully-managed and hosted by Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Platforms. Every critical piece of our application is fully redundant, and we maintain off-site back-up systems and can provision a disaster recovery facility. Our network connectivity offers high performance and scalability to accommodate increases in website traffic. Since January 1, 2003, we have experienced no material service interruptions on our ecommerce marketplaces. Our applications support multiple layers of security, including password-protected log-ins, encryption technology to safeguard information transmitted in web sessions and firewalls to help prevent unauthorized access to our network and servers. We devote significant efforts to protecting our systems from intrusion. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, we launched our first marketplace, the IronDirect marketplace, on the new LiquidityOne Platform. The launch of IronDirect supports our strategy of leveraging investments in technology, superior process and integrated services to drive transparency, 11 convenience and win-win value creation for customers in large, global markets. During fiscal year 2017, we will continue to migrate our remaining marketplaces to the LiquidityOne Platform. Operations Supporting large organizations that have a recurring need to sell surplus and salvage assets requires systematic processes to enhance the financial value and convenience received by our customers. We believe we have integrated all of the required operational processes into our solution to efficiently and to effectively support our buyers and sellers. Our operations group is comprised of three functions: (1) buyer relations, (2) shipping logistics and (3) distribution center and field service operations. Buyer relations Our buyer relations group supports the completion of buyer transactions by managing the buyer registration and qualification process, answering questions and requests from buyers, collecting buyer payments and resolving disputes. Our websites contain extensive information about buying through our ecommerce marketplaces, including an online tutorial regarding the use of our marketplaces, answers to frequently-asked buyer questions and an indexed help section. Buyers are able to contact a customer service representative by live chat as well as e-mail or phone if they need additional support. Shipping logistics Our shipping logistics group manages and coordinates inbound and outbound shipping of merchandise for sellers and buyers. We offer, as part of our value-added services, integrated shipping services using our own fleet or multiple vetted and pre-qualified carrier partners. In addition, our shipping coordination group personnel monitor the performance and service level of our network of carriers to help ensure speed and quality of service. Distribution center and field service operations Our distribution center and field service operations group performs selected pre-sale and post-sale value-added services at our distribution centers and at seller locations globally. These activities include unloading, manifesting and reporting discrepancies for all received assets and sales preparation of offered assets, including merchandising and organizing offered assets, writing product descriptions, capturing digital images and/or video and providing additional optional value-added services such as returns management (RM) services, return to vendor (RTV) services and product delabeling, data cleaning/wiping, testing, refurbishment and repackaging. Our distribution center and field service operations group personnel also arrange the outbound shipping or pick-up of purchased assets with our buyers. Competition The online services market for auctioning or liquidating surplus and salvage assets is competitive and growing rapidly. We currently compete with: (cid:129) other e-commerce providers; (cid:129) auction websites; (cid:129) government agencies that have created websites to sell surplus and salvage assets; and (cid:129) traditional liquidators and fixed-site auctioneers. We expect our market to become even more competitive as traditional and online liquidators and auctioneers continue to develop online and offline services for disposition, redeployment and 12 remarketing of surplus and salvage assets. In addition, manufacturers, retailers and additional government agencies may decide to create their own websites to sell their own surplus and salvage assets and those of third parties. Competitive pressures could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. In our IronDirect and retail TruckCenter businesses we compete with local, regional and national sellers and rental companies offering vehicles and construction equipment, respectively, as well as parts and service suppliers. Some of our other current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger client bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, some of these competitors may be able to devote greater financial resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, secure merchandise from sellers on more favorable terms, adopt more aggressive pricing or inventory availability policies and devote substantially more resources to website and systems development than we are able to do. Increased competition may result in reduced operating margins and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Our Contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense We have two material contracts with the DoD, the Surplus Contract and the Scrap Contract, under which we acquire, manage and sell government property. This relationship provides a significant supply of goods that we offer to our buyer base through our ecommerce marketplace www.govliquidation.com. In support of these contracts, we provide services in over 2 million square feet of military space at over 150 military bases throughout the United States and in U.S. territories. The Surplus Contract is a competitive-bid contract under which we acquire, manage and sell usable DoD surplus personal property turned into the DLA Disposition Services (‘‘DLA’’). Surplus property generally consists of items determined by the DoD to be no longer needed, and not claimed for reuse by, any federal agency, such as computers, electronics, office supplies, scientific and medical equipment, aircraft parts, clothing and textiles. The Surplus Contract requires us to purchase all usable surplus property offered by the DoD at 4.35% of the DoD’s original acquisition value (OAV). The current, or third, Surplus Contract became effective December 2014, covers only non-rolling stock and has a base term of two years with four one-year options to extend. The prior, or second, Surplus Contract required us to purchase all rolling and non-rolling usable surplus property offered by the DoD at 1.8% of the DoD’s OAV; the wind-down period under the second Surplus Contract will remain in effect until January 2017 to allow for the continued processing of usable Recycling Control Point (RCP) non-rolling stock surplus property. Revenue from the second and third Surplus Contracts (including buyer premiums) accounted for approximately 26.8%, 24.7%, and 31.0% of our total revenue for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014, 2015, and 2016. The property sold under the second and third Surplus Contracts accounted for approximately 14.3%, 12.3%, and 12.7% of our GMV for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The DoD has broad discretion to determine what property will be made available for sale to us under the Surplus Contract and may retrieve or restrict property previously sold to us for national security, public safety, or other reasons or if the property is otherwise needed to support the mission of the DoD. Scrap Contract. The Scrap Contract is a competitive-bid contract under which we acquire, manage and sell substantially all scrap property of the DoD turned into the DLA at a per pound price. Scrap property generally consists of items determined by the DoD to have no value beyond their base material content value, such as metals, alloys, and building materials. Under the current Scrap 13 Contract, which became effective on October 1, 2016, we acquire scrap property from the DLA and pay the DLA a revenue-sharing payment equal to 64.5% of the gross resale proceeds. We bear all of the costs for the sorting, merchandising and sale of the property. The Scrap Contract has a 36-month base term, with two 12-month extension options exercisable by the DLA. Under the prior Scrap Contract that expired September 30, 2016, we paid the DLA 65-75% of the profits realized from the sale of the inventory, after deduction for allowable expenses. We refer to the disbursement payments to the DoD as profit-sharing distributions, and we recognize as revenue the gross proceeds from the sales. During fiscal 2015, if the Company’s customer base met certain small business criteria as defined in the contract, we received an additional incentive payment which was withheld from payments to the DLA. Revenue from the Scrap contract accounted for approximately 14.4%, 15.3% and 10.2% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, and 7.7%, 7.6%, and 5.0% of our GMV for the twelve months ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. These Surplus and Scrap contracts require us to satisfy export control and other regulatory requirements in connection with sales. Specifically, for specified categories of property sold under the contracts that are designated by the DoD as being subject to export controls, we are required to (1) obtain an end-use certificate from the prospective buyer describing the nature of the buyer’s business, describing the expected disposition and specific end-use of the property, and acknowledging the applicability of pertinent export control and economic sanctions laws and (2) confirm that each buyer has been cleared to purchase export-controlled items. Applicable export controls include the Export Administration Regulations enforced by the Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the International Traffic In Arms Regulations enforced by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (‘‘DDTC’’) of the U.S. Department of State. Our collection, settlement tools and procedures are designed so that transactions for these categories of property cannot be completed until we receive a completed end-use certificate and confirmation of the buyer’s trade security controls clearance. In addition, we do not combine export-controlled property into auction lots with property not subject to export controls. We are also prohibited from selling property to persons or entities that appear on lists of restricted or prohibited parties maintained by the United States or other governments, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Entity List maintained by BIS, the Denied Persons List maintained by BIS and the Debarred Parties List maintained by DDTC. In addition, we are prohibited from selling to countries, regimes, or nationals that are the target of applicable economic sanctions or other embargoes. As part of each sale, we collect information from potential customers that our systems cross reference against a list of restricted or prohibited parties and countries, regimes, or nationals that are the target of economic sanctions or other embargoes in order to comply with these restrictions. Failure to satisfy any of these export control and other regulatory requirements could subject us to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of the DLA Disposition Services contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with U.S. federal government agencies. Government Regulation We are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws, including laws protecting the privacy of customer non-public information and regulations prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices. Furthermore, the growth and demand for ecommerce has resulted in and may continue to result in more stringent consumer protection laws that impose additional compliance burdens on ecommerce 14 companies. Many jurisdictions also regulate ‘‘auctions’’ and ‘‘auctioneers’’ and may regulate online auction services. These consumer protection laws and regulations could result in substantial compliance costs and could interfere with the conduct of our business. In many states, there is currently great uncertainty about whether or how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, auctions and auctioneering, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet and commercial online services. These issues may take years to resolve. New legislation or regulation, the application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to our business or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and commercial online services could result in significant additional taxes or regulatory restrictions on our business. These potential restrictions could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations. Furthermore, there is a possibility that we may be subject to significant fines or other payments for any past failures to comply with these requirements. In connection with our contracts with the U.S. federal government, the U.S. federal government has the right to audit and review our performance on our government contracts, as well as our compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, we sell merchandise under our government contracts, such as scientific instruments, information technology equipment and aircraft parts, that is subject to further government regulations, some of which may require us to obtain an export license in certain circumstances or an end-use certificate from the buyer. In the United States, the sale of this type of merchandise is further regulated by, among others, the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the economic sanctions and embargo laws enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulations. If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, or if we are alleged to have violated any laws or regulations governing the products we sell under our government contracts, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, denial of export privileges, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with U.S. federal government agencies. See ‘‘Risk Factors—Unfavorable findings resulting from a government investigation or audit could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions, could negatively impact our future operating results and could force us to adjust previously reported operating results.’’ Intellectual Property We regard our intellectual property, particularly domain names, copyrights and trade secrets, as critical to our success. We rely on a combination of contractual restrictions and common law copyright and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights, know-how, information and technology. These contractual restrictions include confidentiality and non-compete provisions. We generally enter into agreements containing these provisions with our employees, contractors and third parties with whom we have strategic relationships. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property without our authorization. We currently are the registered owners of several Internet domain names, including www.liquidation.com, www.govliquidation.com, www.govdeals.com, www.networkintl.com, www.truckcenter.com, www.secondipity.com, www.go-dove.com, and www.irondirect.com. We pursue the registration of our trademarks in the U.S. and internationally. Effective patent, copyright, trademarks, trade secret and domain name protection is expensive to maintain and may require litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights. We seek to protect our domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions and may not be successful in certain jurisdictions. We rely on technologies that we license from third parties. These licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms in the future. As a result, we may be required to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or at greater cost, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 15 We do not believe that our business, sales policies or technologies infringe the proprietary rights of third parties. However, third parties have in the past and may in the future claim that our business, sales policies or technologies infringe their rights. We expect that participants in the e-commerce market will be increasingly subject to infringement claims as the number of services and competitors in the industry grows. Any such claim, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation or an injunction or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements might not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all or may be prohibited by an injunction. As a result, any such claim of infringement against us could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Employees As of September 30, 2016, we had 713 U.S. employees, including 93 in sales and marketing, 92 in technology, 73 in customer service, 369 in operations and 86 in finance and administration. In addition, as of that date, we had 240 international employees, including 88 in sales and marketing, 8 in technology, 3 in customer service, 103 in operations and 38 in finance and administration. None of our U.S. employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees. Available Information Our annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, amendments to those reports and other information are also made available free of charge on our website www.liquidityservices.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC. We use our website as a channel of distribution for material company information. Important information, including news releases, analyst presentations and financial information regarding the Company is routinely posted on and accessible at www.liquidityservices.com. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This document contains forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include but are not limited to those listed in Part I, Item 1A (‘‘Risk Factors’’) and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from time to time. You can identify forward- looking statements by terminology such as ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘would,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘predicts,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘continues’’ or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. There may be other factors of which we are currently unaware or deem immaterial that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this Annual Report and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this document. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. 16 Item 1A. Risk Factors. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes, before making an investment decision with respect to our common stock. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could suffer. As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not in any particular order and are not the only significant risks we may face. Other events that we do not currently anticipate or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results of operations and financial condition. We depend on contracts with the United States Department of Defense for a significant portion of our revenue, and if our relationship with the United States Department of Defense is disrupted, we would experience a significant decrease in revenue and income. We have two material contracts with the DLA Disposition Services under which we acquire, manage and sell surplus and scrap property of the DoD. If our relationship with the DoD is impaired, we are not awarded new DoD contracts when our current contracts expire, any of our DoD contracts are terminated or the supply of assets under the contracts is significantly decreased, we would experience a significant decrease in revenue and have difficulty generating income. The Surplus Contract accounted for 26.8%, 24.7% and 31.0% of our revenue and 14.3%, 12.3% and 12.7% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The Scrap Contract accounted for 14.4%, 15.3% and 10.2% of our revenue and 7.7%, 7.6% and 5.0% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We believe that these contracts will continue to be the source of a significant portion of our revenue and GMV during their respective terms. The current Surplus Contract has an initial two-year term that ends in December 2016. There are four one-year options to extend, exercisable by DLA Disposition Services. The current Scrap Contract has a three-year base term that will expire in September 2019, subject to the DoD’s right to extend for two additional one-year terms. The contracts were awarded by the DoD through a competitive bidding process, and we may be required to go through a new competitive bidding process when our existing contracts expire. Under the current Surplus Contract, as amended, we are obligated to purchase all DoD surplus property at 4.35% of Disposition Services’ original acquisition value (‘‘OAV’’). The DoD has broad discretion to determine what property will be made available for sale to us under the Surplus Contract and may retrieve or restrict property previously sold to us for national security or public safety reasons or if the property is otherwise needed to support the mission of the DoD. The DoD may also elect to provide for itself certain services that we currently provide under the Surplus Contract. Although the revenue we earn for these services has increased, if the DoD makes such an election, the revenue we earn under the Surplus Contract will decrease. Our Surplus Contract and our Scrap Contract with the DoD allow either party to terminate the contract for convenience. The DoD also has the right, after giving us notice and a 30-day opportunity to cure, to terminate the contracts and seek other contract remedies in the event of material breaches. We expect that there will be significant competition to renew our DoD contracts. We may not win any such competitive solicitation, as one or more providers may offer to provide the same or similar services at a more favorable price. Even if we win the competitive procurement, we could be required to reduce significantly the prices we charge for our services under the new contracts. The failure to win the competitive solicitation or a requirement to provide our services at significantly less favorable prices would materially adversely affect our revenues and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. 17 Unfavorable findings resulting from a government audit or investigation could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions, could negatively impact our future operating results and could force us to adjust previously reported operating results. The federal government has the right to audit our performance under our government contracts. Any adverse findings from audits or reviews of our performance under our contracts could result in a significant adjustment to our previously reported operating results. The results of an audit by the government could significantly limit the volume and type of merchandise made available to us under our contracts with the DoD, resulting in lower gross merchandise volume, revenue, and profitability for our company. If such a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties, administrative sanctions and could suffer serious harm to our reputation. Government and law enforcement agencies may also investigate our other activities under our DoD contracts and our company. If such an investigation alleges that we engaged in improper or illegal activities, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with U.S. federal government agencies. If, as the result of a government audit or investigation, or for any other reason, we are suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government generally, or any specific agency, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies is impaired, or if the government otherwise ceases doing business with us or significantly decreases the amount of business it does with us, our revenue and profitability would substantially decrease. The success of our business depends on our ability to successfully obtain a supply of merchandise for our buyers and to attract and retain active professional buyers to create sufficient demand for our sellers. Our ability to increase our revenue and maintain profitability depends on whether we can successfully expand the supply of merchandise available for sale on our ecommerce marketplaces and attract and retain active professional buyers to purchase the merchandise. Our ability to attract sufficient quantities of suitable merchandise and new buyers will depend on various factors, some of which are out of our control. These factors include our ability to: (cid:129) offer sellers liquid marketplaces for their surplus and salvage assets; (cid:129) offer buyers a sufficient supply of merchandise; (cid:129) develop and implement effective sales and marketing strategies; (cid:129) comply with regulatory or corporate seller requirements affecting marketing and disposition of certain categories of merchandise; (cid:129) efficiently catalogue, handle, store, ship and track merchandise; and (cid:129) achieve high levels of seller and buyer satisfaction with the trading experience. We face intense competition. Our businesses are rapidly evolving and intensely competitive, and we have many competitors in different industries, including the online services market for auctioning or liquidating surplus and salvage assets and retail markets. Competitive pressures could affect our ability to attract and retain customers, which could decrease our revenue and negatively affect our operating results. In our marketplaces for surplus and salvage assets, we currently compete with: (cid:129) other e-commerce providers; (cid:129) auction websites; 18 (cid:129) government agencies that have created websites to sell surplus and salvage assets; and (cid:129) traditional liquidators and fixed-site auctioneers. We expect our market to become even more competitive as traditional and online liquidators and auctioneers continue to develop online and offline services for disposition, redeployment and remarketing of surplus and salvage assets. In addition, manufacturers, retailers and government agencies may decide to create their own websites to sell their own surplus and salvage assets and those of third parties. The identity and composition of our competitors will expand as we increase our activity in our TruckCenter and IronDirect businesses. We will compete in these businesses with local, regional and national sellers and rental companies offering vehicles and construction equipment, respectively, as well as parts and service suppliers. Competition may intensify in each of our businesses as our competitors enter into business combinations or alliances and established companies in other market segments expand to become competitive with our business. In addition, new and enhanced technologies, including search, web and infrastructure computing services, digital content, and electronic devices, may increase our competition. The Internet facilitates competitive entry and comparison shopping, and increased competition may reduce our sales and profits. Some of our other current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger client bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. They may be able to devote greater financial resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, secure better terms from sellers and vendors, adopt more aggressive pricing or inventory availability policies and devote substantially more resources to technology and infrastructure than we are able to do. Increased competition may result in reduced operating margins and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Our operating results depend on our websites, network infrastructure, transaction processing systems, and our software runs on public clouds. Service interruptions or system failures could negatively affect the demand for our services and our ability to grow our revenue. Any system interruptions that affect our websites or our transaction systems could impair the services that we provide to our sellers and buyers. In addition, our systems and data centers may be vulnerable to damage from a variety of other sources, including, for example, (cid:129) damage to, or failure of, our computer software or hardware or our connections to, and outsourced service arrangements with, third parties; (cid:129) failure of, or defects in, the third-party systems, software or equipment on which we rely to access our data centers and other systems; (cid:129) errors in the processing of data by our systems; (cid:129) computer viruses, malware or software defects; (cid:129) physical or electronic break-ins, sabotage, distributed denial of service, or DDoS, penetration attacks, intentional acts of vandalism and similar events; and (cid:129) telecommunications failures, power outages, pandemics, political unrest, malicious human acts and natural disasters. Improving the reliability and redundancy of our systems may be expensive, reduce our margins and may not be successful in preventing system failures. Our services are also substantially dependent on systems provided by third parties, over whom we have little control. We have occasionally experienced 19 interruptions to our services due to system failures unrelated to our own systems. Any disruption to our data centers, interruptions or failures of our current systems or our ability to communicate with third party systems could negatively affect the demand for our services and our ability to grow our revenue. Although we carry specific insurance against cybersecurity events, our insurance coverage may be inadequate to compensate us for any related losses we incur. We are implementing a new eCommerce marketplace and back-office solution integrated with an Enterprise Resource Planning (‘‘ERP’’) system as part of our LiquidityOne Transformation initiative in order to upgrade and replace with cloud-based solutions, our information technology systems used to operate our business. Upon implementation of the new cloud-based solutions, a large portion of our information technology systems will be comprised mostly of outsourced, cloud-based infrastructure, platform, and software as a service solutions not under our direct management or control. Any disruption to either the outsourced systems or the communication links between us and the outsourced supplier, could negatively impact our ability to operate our websites or our transaction systems and could impair the services that we provide to our sellers and buyers. We may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions. In addition, implementation of the LiquidityOne transformation plan and the new ERP system will require substantial changes to our software and network infrastructure, which could lead to system interruptions, affect our websites and transaction systems and further expose us to operational disruptions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. If we do not respond to rapid technological changes or upgrade our systems, we could fail to grow our business and our revenue could decrease. To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our e-commerce business through initiatives like the LiquidityOne transformation initiative. Although we currently do not have specific plans for any upgrades that would require significant capital investment beyond the LiquidityOne Transformation, in the future we will need to improve and upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems and network infrastructure in order to allow our operations to grow in both size and scope. Without such improvements, our operations might suffer from unanticipated system disruptions, slow transaction processing, unreliable service levels, or impaired quality or delays in reporting accurate financial information, any of which could negatively affect our reputation and ability to attract and retain sellers and buyers. We may also face material delays in introducing new services, products and enhancements. The Internet and the e-commerce industry are rapidly changing. If competitors introduce new products and services using new technologies or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing websites and our proprietary technology and systems may become obsolete. In addition, the expansion and improvement of our systems and infrastructure may require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources, with no assurance our business will increase. If we fail to respond to technological change or to adequately maintain, expand, upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure in a timely fashion our ability to grow could be limited and our revenue could decrease. We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from our LiquidityOne Transformation initiative. We expect our LiquidityOne Transformation initiative will significantly increase our efficiency and productivity, the functionality of our marketplaces and our cross-selling opportunities, as well as decrease the cost of our systems infrastructure, all of which will drive scale and growth for our company and have a positive effect on our business, competitive position and results of operations. This initiative is a major undertaking that will replace many of our existing operating and financial systems over the course of multiple years. We cannot assure you that the LiquidityOne Transformation program will be beneficial to the extent or within the timeframes expected, or that the estimated efficiency, cost savings and other improvements will be realized as anticipated or at all. If the LiquidityOne 20 Transformation program is not implemented successfully and within budget, or if the changes, including the new ERP system do not perform in a satisfactory manner, it could disrupt or otherwise materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. Similarly, if our buyers and sellers fail to accept our new platform or our new unified process for handling the transactions on all of our marketplaces, it could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our LiquidityOne Transformation program places a significant strain on our management, operational, financial and other resources. As part of the LiquidityOne Transformation program, we are replacing multiple non-scalable legacy IT platforms with a singular, modular technology platform with key modules for unified management of client/sellers and buyers, property handling, transaction processing and finance functions across our entire company. The new platform is designed to provide our buyers access to all the property available in all our marketplaces, provide a common account experience for sellers, harmonize, simplify and streamline our operations. This program is placing significant strain on our management, personnel, operations, systems, technical performance and financial resources and internal financial control and reporting function. The LiquidityOne Transformation initiative will require management time and resources to educate employees and implement new ways of conducting business. We may not be able to effectively manage this initiative, including its timing, costs, and adoption by client/sellers and buyers, which could negatively affect our business and our operating results, as well as result in damage to our reputation and our prospects. In addition, the dedication of resources to the LiquidityOne Transformation program limits the resources we have available to devote to other initiatives or growth opportunities, or to invest in the maintenance of our internal systems. Further, the timing of completion of various phases of marketplace rollouts on to the new LiquidityOne platform could be delayed, resulting in higher costs during the implementation and greater strain on management time and resources. We may need additional financing in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. We may need additional funds to finance our operations, as well as to enhance our services, and acquire inventory for our businesses, fund initiatives such as the LiquidityOne Transformation program, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or otherwise support our growth. We may also require additional funds if vendors and other third parties from whom we purchase inventory, other goods or services extend less favorable credit terms to us. Our business may not generate the cash needed to finance such requirements. We currently do not have a revolving credit facility with third-party lenders from which we may draw funds. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders would be reduced, and these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock. The general economic and capital market conditions in the United States and other parts of the world can deteriorate significantly, adversely affecting access to capital and increasing the cost of capital. A large degree of uncertainty remains both domestically and abroad, which can adversely impact access to capital, and the cost of capital. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to enhance our services, fund strategic initiatives, respond to competitive pressures, take advantage of business opportunities or grow our business would be limited, and we might need to restrict our operations and initiatives. Shipment of merchandise sold in our marketplaces could be delayed or disrupted by factors beyond our control and we could lose buyers and sellers as a result. We rely upon third-party carriers such as United Parcel Services, or UPS, for timely delivery of our merchandise shipments. As a result, we are subject to carrier disruptions and increased costs due to 21 factors that are beyond our control, including labor difficulties, inclement weather, terrorist activity and increased fuel costs. In addition, we do not have a long-term agreement with UPS or any other third party carriers, and we cannot be sure that our relationship with UPS will continue on terms favorable to us, if at all. If our relationship with UPS is terminated or impaired or if UPS is unable to deliver merchandise for us, we would be required to use alternative carriers for the shipment of products to our buyers. We may be unable to engage alternative carriers on a timely basis or on terms favorable to us, if at all. Potential adverse consequences include: (cid:129) reduced visibility of order status and package tracking; (cid:129) delays in merchandise receipt and delivery; (cid:129) increased cost of shipment; and (cid:129) reduced shipment quality, which may result in damaged merchandise. Any failure to receive merchandise at our distribution centers or deliver products to our buyers in a timely and accurate manner could lead to client dissatisfaction and cause us to lose sellers and buyers. A significant interruption in the operations of our customer service system or our distribution centers could harm our business and operating results. Our business depends, to a large degree, on effective customer service and distribution center operations. We currently staff DoD warehouse distribution space, for which we do not incur leasing costs, as well as leased commercial warehouse distribution space. These operations could be harmed by several factors, including any material disruption or slowdown at our distribution centers resulting from labor disputes, changes in the terms of our underlying lease agreements or occupancy arrangements in the case of government provided facilities, telecommunications failures, power or service outages, human error, terrorist attacks, natural disasters or other events. In addition, space provided to us by the DoD could be re-configured or reduced in the DoD’s discretion. If we fail to accurately predict our ability to sell merchandise in which we take inventory risk and credit risk, our margins may decline as a result of lower sale prices from such merchandise. Under our profit-sharing and purchase model, we purchase merchandise and assume the risk that the merchandise may sell for less than we paid for it. We assume general and physical inventory and credit risk. These risks are especially significant because some of the goods we sell on our websites are characterized by rapid technological change, obsolescence and price erosion, and because we sometimes make large purchases of particular types of inventory. In addition, we do not typically receive warranties on the surplus goods we purchase and, as a result, we have to resell or dispose of any returned goods. Historically, the number of disposed goods (which includes returned goods that we have not resold) has been less than 2% of the goods we have purchased. To manage our inventory successfully, we need to maintain sufficient buyer demand and sell merchandise for a reasonable financial return. We may overpay for the acquired merchandise if we miscalculate buyer demand or the acquired merchandise has defects of which we were unaware. In the event that merchandise is not attractive to our buyer base, we may be required to take significant losses resulting from lower sale prices, which could reduce our revenue and margins. Currency exchange rates may negatively affect our results if we pay for inventory using a different currency than we receive when we sell the inventory. Declines in commodity prices may also reduce the profit we are able to realize in our scrap business. For example, we may not be able to sell our inventory for amounts above its cost and we may incur a loss in products we handle for our commercial clients. From time to time, in our capital assets marketplace, we make very significant inventory acquisitions, such as the purchase of semi-conductor equipment and biopharma and metal-working 22 machinery, for subsequent resale on our energy and industrial marketplaces. We plan to continue to opportunistically make such acquisitions. The risks described above are heightened in connection with these acquisitions due to their size and, at times, the limited market for the assets we acquire. If we obtain financing to fund such acquisitions, such financing will increase our costs, which will decrease any profits we receive from the sale of the acquired assets. As we grow our business, we may choose to increase the amount of merchandise we purchase directly from sellers, thus resulting in increased inventory levels and related risk. Any such increase would require the use of additional working capital and subject us to the additional risk of incurring losses on the sale of that inventory. We may be unable to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could harm our reputation and negatively impact the growth of our business. We regard our intellectual property, particularly domain names, copyrights and trade secrets, as critical to our success. We rely on a combination of contractual restrictions and copyright and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights, know-how, information and technology. Despite these protections, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property without authorization or independently develop similar intellectual property. We currently are the registered owners of several Internet domain names, including www.liquidation.com, www.govliquidation.com, www.govdeals.com, www.networkintl.com, www.truckcenter.com, www.secondipity.com, www.go-dove.com and www.irondirect.com. We pursue the registration of our domain names in the U.S. and internationally. We currently do not have any patents or registered copyrights, but we are pursuing patents. Effective patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret and domain name protection is expensive to maintain and may require litigation. Our competitors may adopt trade names or domain names similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to promote our marketplaces and possibly leading to client confusion. In addition, we could face trade name or trademark or service mark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks, including trademarks or service marks that may incorporate variations of our marketplace names. Any claims related to our intellectual property or client confusion related to our marketplaces could damage our reputation and negatively impact the growth of our business. If we fail to successfully identify, finance and integrate acquisitions, our future operating results may be materially adversely affected. We have expanded our business in part through acquisitions and may continue to do so in the future. The success in any future growth strategy involving acquisitions will depend on our ability to identify, and the availability of, suitable acquisition candidates. We may incur costs in the preliminary stages of an acquisition, but may ultimately be unable or unwilling to consummate the proposed transaction for various reasons. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including our ability to successfully integrate the acquired businesses and operations with our other businesses and fully realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions. If we are not able to achieve these objectives in a cost-effective and timely manner, we may not fully realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition or it may take us longer to realize the benefits of the acquisition than we expect. Acquired operations outside the U.S. may present unique challenges or increase our exposure to risks associated with foreign operations, including foreign currency risks and risks associated with local regulatory regimes. The integration process could result in the loss of key customers, employees or vendors, increase our operating or other costs, decrease our profit margins or disrupt our other businesses, each of which could impair our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Our efforts to integrate acquired businesses will divert management’s attention and resources from our other businesses. Any 23 failure to timely realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, expenses and operating results. Acquisitions could result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, one-time write-offs of goodwill and substantial amortization expenses of other intangible assets. We may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, if necessary to finance future acquisitions, making it impossible or more costly to acquire other businesses. If we are able to obtain financing, the terms may be onerous and restrict our operations. Further, certain acquisitions may be subject to regulatory approval, which can be time-consuming and costly to obtain, and the terms of such regulatory approvals may impose limitations on our ongoing operations or require us to divest assets or lines of business. Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may do so in the future, which could cause volatility in our stock price. Our prior operating results have fluctuated due to changes in our business and the e-commerce industry. Similarly, our future operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. You should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our operating results as an indication of our future performance. Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include the following: (cid:129) our ability to retain and increase sales to existing buyers, attract new buyers and satisfy buyer demands; (cid:129) our ability to retain and expand our base of sellers; (cid:129) entry into, or the modification, termination or expiration of, material contracts; (cid:129) the volume, size, timing and completion rate of transactions in our marketplaces, including variability due to the timing of large, project based activities; (cid:129) changes in the supply and demand for and the volume, price, mix and quality of our supply of surplus and salvage assets; (cid:129) introduction of new or enhanced websites, services or product offerings by us or our competitors, which may impact our margins; (cid:129) implementation costs of significant new contracts; (cid:129) changes in the volume and type of value-added services we provide to the DoD or other buyers and sellers; (cid:129) changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; (cid:129) changes in the conditions and economic prospects of the e-commerce industry or the economy generally, which could alter current or prospective buyers’ and sellers’ priorities; (cid:129) impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets; (cid:129) technical difficulties, including telecommunication system or Internet failures; (cid:129) changes in government regulation of the Internet and e-commerce industry; (cid:129) the extent to which use of our services is affected by spyware, viruses, phishing and other spam emails, denial of service attacks, data theft, computer intrusions, outages and similar events; (cid:129) event-driven disruptions such as war, terrorism, armed hostilities, disease and natural disasters; (cid:129) changes in energy and commodities prices, including the timing and speed of recovery in energy sector macro conditions; 24 (cid:129) seasonal patterns in selling and purchasing activity; (cid:129) costs related to acquisitions of technology or equipment; and (cid:129) rising health care insurance costs. Our operating results may fall below the expectations of market analysts and investors in some future periods. If this occurs, even temporarily, it could cause volatility in our stock price. Our inability to use software licensed from third parties or our use of open source software under license terms that interfere with our proprietary rights could disrupt our business. We use software licensed from third parties, including some software, known as open-source software that we use without charge. We currently use the following open-source software: Linux (an operating system); MySQL (database software); PERL (an interpreter); Apache (a web server); Java; Liferay (content management system); Mule (enterprise service bus); ActiveMQ (message queue); Tomcat (application container); Chef (infrastructure automation); and Jenkins (code deployment) and we may in the future use additional open-source software. In the future, these licenses to third party software may not be available on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. As described above, we currently rely on third parties to provide cloud-based services. Upon completion of our LiquidityOne Transformation program, we will rely to a greater degree on outsourced, cloud-based, platform as a service solutions not under our direct management or control. Our inability to use third-party software or to enter into agreements on acceptable terms with providers of cloud-based solutions could result in disruptions to our business, or delays in the development of future services or enhancements of existing services, which could impair our business. In addition, the terms of certain open source software licenses may require us to provide modified versions of the open source software, which we develop, if any, or any proprietary software that incorporates all or a portion of the open source software, if any, to others on unfavorable license terms that are consistent with the open source license term. If we are required to license our proprietary software in accordance with the foregoing, our competitors and other third parties could obtain access to our intellectual property, which could harm our business. Assertions that we infringe on intellectual property rights of others could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and operating results. Other parties may assert that we have infringed on their technology or other intellectual property rights. We use internally developed systems and licensed technology to operate our online auction platform and related websites. Third parties could assert intellectual property infringement claims against us based on our internally developed systems or use of licensed third party technology. Third parties also could assert intellectual property infringement claims against parties from whom we license technology. If we are forced to defend against any infringement claims, whether they are with or without merit or are determined in our favor, we may face costly litigation, diversion of technical and management personnel and/or delays in completion of sales. Furthermore, the outcome of a dispute may be that we would need to change technology, develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. A switch to different technology could cause interruptions in our business. Internal development of a non-infringing technology may be expensive and time-consuming, if we are able to successfully develop such technology at all. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Incurrence of any of these costs could negatively impact our operating results. 25 If we do not retain our senior management and other key personnel, we may not be able to achieve our business objectives. Our future success, including our ability to implement successfully the LiquidityOne transformation program is substantially dependent on the continued service of our senior management and other key personnel, particularly William P. Angrick, III, our chief executive officer. We do not have key-person insurance on any of our officers or employees. The loss of any member of our existing senior management team could damage key seller relationships, result in the loss of key information, expertise or know-how, lead to unanticipated recruitment and training costs and make it more difficult to successfully operate our business and achieve our business goals. Further, the loss of any of our key personnel involved in the implementation of the LiquidityOne Transformation program may cause delays in, or otherwise impair, the successful implementation of the program. If we are unable to attract and retain skilled employees, our business may be harmed. Our future success depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees, particularly employees with sales, marketing, operations and technology expertise. Competition for employees in our industry is intense. We have experienced difficulty from time to time in attracting the personnel necessary to support the growth of our business, and we may experience similar difficulties in the future. If we are unable to attract, assimilate and retain employees with the necessary skills, we may not be able to grow our business and revenue as expected and we could experience increased turnover, decreased levels of customer service, low morale, inefficiency or internal control failures. The seasonality of our business places increased strain on our operations. We have seasonality in each portion of our business. We expect a disproportionate amount of transactions on our marketplaces to occur at certain times during the year. If we are unable to effectively manage increased demand, or the increased flow of goods that we typically experience during these times, it could significantly affect our revenue and our future growth. If too many customers access our websites within a short period of time due to increased demand, we may experience system interruptions that make our websites unavailable or prevent us from providing efficient service, which may reduce our GMV and the attractiveness of our value-added services. In addition, we may be unable to adequately staff our distribution centers during these peak periods. Our international operations expose us to a number of risks. Our international activities are significant to our revenues and profits, and we may continue to expand internationally. It is costly to establish, develop, and maintain international operations and websites, and promote our brand internationally. Our international operations may not be profitable on a sustained basis. In addition to risks described elsewhere in this section, our international operations are subject to a number of risks, including: (cid:129) local economic and political conditions, or civil unrest that may disrupt economic activity in affected countries; (cid:129) government regulation of e-commerce and other services, competition, and restrictive governmental actions (such as trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and custom duties and tariffs), nationalization, and restrictions on foreign ownership; (cid:129) restrictions on sales or distribution of certain products or services and uncertainty regarding liability for products and services, including uncertainty as a result of less Internet-friendly legal systems, local laws, lack of legal precedent, and varying rules, regulations, and practices regarding the enforcement of intellectual property rights; 26 (cid:129) business licensing or certification requirements, such as for imports, exports, and web services; (cid:129) limitations on the repatriation and investment of funds and foreign currency exchange restrictions; (cid:129) shorter payable and longer receivable cycles and the resultant negative impact on cash flow; (cid:129) laws and regulations regarding consumer and data protection, privacy, network security, encryption, payments, and restrictions on pricing or discounts; (cid:129) lower levels of consumer spending and fewer opportunities for growth compared to the U.S.; (cid:129) lower levels of credit card usage and increased payment risk; (cid:129) different employee/employer relationships and the existence of works councils; (cid:129) compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other applicable U.S. and foreign laws prohibiting certain payments to government officials and other third parties; (cid:129) laws and policies of the U.S. and other jurisdictions affecting trade, foreign investment, loans, and taxes; and (cid:129) geopolitical events, including war and terrorism. Our operations are subject to extensive anti-corruption laws and regulations. Due to the international scope of our operations, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and similar foreign anti-corruption laws. These laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments or providing anything of value to improperly influence foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, or obtaining an unfair advantage. Global enforcement of these laws has increased substantially in recent years. Violations of anti-corruption laws or regulations by our employees or by intermediaries acting on our behalf may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, could disrupt our business, and result in an adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations or financial condition. The economic effects of ‘‘Brexit’’ may affect relationships with existing and future customers and could have an adverse impact on our business and operating results. On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (the ‘‘U.K.’’) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (‘‘E.U.’’), commonly referred to as ‘‘Brexit.’’ The referendum is non-binding; however, it is expected to be passed into law, after which negotiations will commence to determine the future terms of the U.K.’s relationship with the E.U. The impact on us from Brexit will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory and other negotiations. As a result of the referendum, the global markets and currencies have been adversely impacted, including a sharp decline in the value of the British pound as compared to the U.S. dollar. A potential devaluation of the local currencies of our international buyers relative to the U.S. dollar may impair the purchasing power of our international buyers and could cause international buyers to decrease their participation in our marketplaces or use of our services. Volatility in exchange rates resulting from Brexit is expected to continue in the short term as the U.K. negotiates its exit from the E.U. We translate sales and other results denominated in foreign currency into U.S. dollars for our financial statements. During periods of a strengthening dollar, our reported international sales and earnings could be reduced because foreign currencies may translate into fewer U.S. dollars. The withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. may create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our buyers to reduce their participation in our marketplaces or cause our customers generally to 27 reduce their spending on our products and services. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate, and those laws and regulations may be cumbersome, difficult or costly in terms of compliance. Any of these effects of Brexit, among others, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. We face legal uncertainties relating to the Internet in general and to the e-commerce industry in particular and may become subject to costly government regulation. The laws and regulations related to the Internet and e-commerce are evolving. These laws and regulations relate to issues such as user privacy, freedom of expression, pricing, fraud, quality of products and services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights and information security. Laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel and defamation, obscenity and personal privacy could also affect our business. Laws adopted prior to the advent of the Internet may not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies and it is not clear how they will apply. Current and future laws and regulations could increase our cost of doing business and/or decrease the demand for our services. Our auction business may be subject to a variety of additional costly government regulations. Many states and other jurisdictions have regulations governing the conduct of traditional ‘‘auctions’’ and the liability of traditional ‘‘auctioneers’’ in conducting auctions, as well as the handling of property by ‘‘secondhand dealers’’, which may apply to online auction services. In addition, certain states have laws or regulations that expressly apply to online auction services. We expect to continue to incur costs in complying with these laws and could be subject to fines or other penalties for any failure to comply with these laws. We may be required to make changes in our business to comply with these laws, which could increase our costs, reduce our revenue, cause us to prohibit the listing of certain items or restrict certain listing formats in some locations, or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. In addition, the law regarding the potential liability of an online auction service for the activities of its users is not clear. Users of our websites may not always comply with our terms and conditions or with laws and regulations applicable to them and their transactions. It is possible that we may be subject to allegations of civil or criminal liability for any unlawful activities conducted by sellers or buyers. Any costs we incur as a result of any such allegations, or as a result of actual or alleged unlawful transactions using our marketplaces, or in our efforts to prevent any such transactions, may harm our opportunities for future revenue growth. In addition, any negative publicity we receive regarding any such transactions or allegations may damage our reputation, our ability to attract new sellers and buyers and our business. Certain categories of merchandise sold on our marketplaces are subject to government restrictions. We sell merchandise, such as scientific instruments, information technology equipment and aircraft parts, that is subject to export control and economic sanctions laws, among other laws, imposed by the United States and other governments. Such restrictions include the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, and economic sanctions and embargo laws administered by the Office of the Foreign Assets Control Regulations. These restrictions prohibit us from, among other things, selling property to (1) persons or entities that appear on lists of restricted or prohibited parties maintained by the United States or other governments or (2) countries, regimes, or nationals that are the target of applicable economic sanctions or other embargoes. In addition, for specified categories of property sold under our contracts with the DoD, we are required to (1) obtain an end-use certificate from the prospective buyer describing the nature of the buyer’s business, describing the expected disposition and specific end-use of the property, and acknowledging the 28 applicability of pertinent export control and economic sanctions laws and (2) confirm that each buyer has been cleared to purchase export-controlled items. We may incur significant costs or be required to modify our business to comply with these requirements. If we are alleged to have violated any of these laws or regulations we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with U.S. federal government agencies. In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety are made against us, whether or not true. We are exposed to risks related to cybersecurity and protection of confidential information. We retain highly confidential information on behalf of our clients in our systems and databases. Although we maintain security features in our systems that are designed to protect customer information and prevent data loss and other security breaches, such measures cannot provide absolute security and our operations may be susceptible to breaches, including from circumvention of security systems, denial of service attacks or other cyber-attacks, hacking, computer viruses or malware, technical malfunction, employee error, malfeasance, physical breaches, system disruptions or other disruptions. These disruptions may jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our systems. An increasing number of websites, including those owned by several other large Internet and offline companies, have disclosed breaches of their security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on portions of their websites or infrastructure. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable, or degrade service, or sabotage systems, change frequently, may be difficult to detect for a long time, and often are not recognized until launched against a target. Certain efforts may be state sponsored and supported by significant financial and technological resources and therefore may be even more difficult to detect. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. As the Department of Defense is one of our clients, our systems may be especially targeted by such malicious attackers. We currently expend, and may be required to expend significant additional capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. These issues are likely to become more difficult as we expand our operations. Any breach of our security measures, or even a perceived breach of our security measures, could cause us to lose clients, suffer material harm to our business, financial condition, operating results and reputation or be subject to regulatory actions, sanctions or other statutory penalties, litigation, liability for failure to safeguard our clients’ information. Further, the loss of confidential client information could also expose us to the risk of liability and costly litigation. In addition, if there is any perception that we cannot protect our clients’ confidential information, we may lose the ability to retain existing clients and attract new clients and our revenue could decline. If we fail to comply with increasing levels of regulation relating to privacy, our business could suffer harm. We are subject to regulation at the federal, state and international levels relating to privacy and the use of third-party data, including personal user information and employee data. These statutory and regulatory requirements are evolving, increasing in complexity and number, and may change significantly. How companies collect, process, use, store, share or transmit personal and employee data is subject to increasing scrutiny by governments as well as the public, which could influence the adoption of legislation or regulation. New statutory or regulatory developments may restrict our ability to collect and use demographic and personal information from our buyers and our sellers, which could be costly or harm our marketing efforts. Further, there may be conflicts among the privacy and data protections laws adopted by the various countries in which we operate. Judicial and regulatory application and interpretation of these statutory and regulatory requirements are often uncertain and 29 may also limit our marketing efforts. Compliance with regulations regarding privacy, security and protection of user and employee data, increased government or private enforcement, and changing public attitudes about data privacy, may increase the cost of growing our business and require us to expend significant capital and other resources. Our failure to comply with these federal, state and international laws and regulations could subject us to lawsuits, fines, criminal penalties, statutory damages, adverse publicity and other costs which could decrease our profitability. We may be subject to product liability claims if people or property are harmed by the products we sell. Some of the products we sell through our online marketplaces or at our IronDirect and TruckCenter store locations may expose us to product liability claims relating to personal injury, death, or environmental or property damage, and may be the subject of product recalls or other actions. Our exposure to product liability claims may be increased by the fact that we sell products manufactured by third parties. For example, if the manufacturers do not have sufficient protection from such claims, we may be subject to claims relating to the products in question. Defense of any such actions could be costly and involve significant time and attention of our management and other resources, may result in monetary liabilities or penalties, and may require us to change our business in an adverse manner. Although we maintain liability insurance, we cannot be certain that our coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred or that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, some of our agreements with our vendors and sellers do not indemnify us from product liability. If one or more states successfully assert that we should collect sales or other taxes on the sale of our merchandise or the merchandise of third parties that we offer for sale on our websites, our business could be harmed. The application of indirect taxes (such as sales and use tax, value-added tax (‘‘VAT’’), goods and services tax, business tax and gross receipt tax) to ecommerce businesses is a complex and evolving issue. Many of the fundamental statutes and regulations that impose these taxes were established before the adoption and growth of the Internet and ecommerce. In many cases, it is not clear how existing statutes apply to the Internet or ecommerce. In addition, governments around the world are increasingly looking for ways to increase revenues, which has resulted in discussions about tax reform and other legislative action to increase tax revenues, including through indirect taxes. There are many transactions that occur during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are currently required to collect and remit sales taxes in all states for shipment of goods from our DoD contracts. We also collect and remit sales or other similar taxes in respect of shipments of other goods into states in which we have a substantial presence. In addition, as we grow our business, any new operation in states in which we currently do not collect and remit sales taxes could subject shipments into such states to state sales taxes under current or future laws. U.S. Supreme Court decisions restrict the imposition of obligations to collect state and local taxes with respect to sales made over the Internet. However, a number of states have adopted or are considering laws that levy additional taxes on Internet access and electronic commerce transactions. Congress is also considering legislation allowing states to require out-of-state sellers to collect sales and use taxes for ecommerce transactions. It is not possible to predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these initiatives or the impact of these initiatives on our business and marketing strategies that we are considering or may consider in the future. An unfavorable change in U.S. Supreme Court guidance related to sales tax, or a successful assertion by one or more jurisdictions that our sale of merchandise in such jurisdiction is subject to sales or other taxes may result in material tax liabilities, interest and penalties. A change in state or 30 federal laws, or our business model, business strategy, or marketing initiatives may require us to collect sales tax on transactions in which we do not currently collect such tax. These developments, should they occur, may result in a decrease in future sales, may decrease our ability to compete, increase our compliance costs or otherwise harm our business. Similar issues exist outside of the United States, where the application of VAT or other indirect taxes on ecommerce providers is complex and evolving. On January 1, 2015, changes to the rules determining the place of supply (and thus the country of taxation) for all European Union based providers of electronically supplied services were implemented that require that we pay VAT based on the residence or normal place of business of our customers. These changes may result in our paying a higher rate of VAT or VAT on a higher number of transactions. Additionally, we pay input VAT on applicable taxable purchases within the various countries in which we operate. In most cases, we are entitled to reclaim this input VAT from the various countries. However, the application of the laws and rules that allow such reclamation is sometimes uncertain. A successful assertion by one or more countries that we are not entitled to reclaim VAT could harm our business. In certain jurisdictions, we collect and remit indirect taxes on our fees and pay taxes on our purchases of goods and services. However, tax authorities may raise questions about our calculation, reporting and collection of taxes and may ask us to remit additional taxes, as well as the proper calculation of such taxes. Should any new taxes become applicable or if the taxes we pay are found to be deficient, our business could be harmed. Fraudulent activities involving our websites and disputes relating to transactions on our websites may cause us to lose clients and adversely affect our ability to grow our business. We are aware that other companies operating online auction or liquidation services have periodically received complaints of fraudulent activities of buyers or sellers on their websites, including disputes over the quality of goods and services, unauthorized use of credit card and bank account information and identity theft, potential breaches of system security, and infringement of third-party copyrights, trademarks and trade names or other intellectual property rights. We may receive similar complaints if sellers or buyers trading in our marketplaces are alleged to have engaged in fraudulent or unlawful activity. In addition, we may suffer losses as a result of purchases paid for with fraudulent credit card data even though the associated financial institution approved payment. In the case of disputed transactions, we may not be able to require users of our services to fulfill their obligations to make payments or to deliver goods. We also may receive complaints from buyers about the quality of purchased goods, requests for reimbursement, or communications threatening or commencing legal actions against us. Negative publicity generated as a result of fraudulent conduct by third parties or the failure to satisfactorily settle disputes related to transactions on our websites could damage our reputation, cause us to lose clients and adversely affect our ability to grow our business. False or defamatory statements transmitted through our services could harm our reputation and affect our ability to attract clients. The law relating to the liability of online services companies for information carried on or disseminated through their services is currently unsettled. Claims could be made against online services companies under both the U.S. and foreign law for defamation, libel, invasion of privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, or other theories based on the nature and content of the materials disseminated through their services. Our website allows users to make comments regarding the online auction industry in general and other users and their merchandise in particular. Although all such comments are generated by users and not by us, we are aware that claims of defamation or other injury have been made against other companies operating auction services in the past and could be made in the future against us for comments made by users. If we are held liable for information provided by our users and carried on our service, we could be directly harmed and may be forced to implement measures to reduce our liability. This may require us to expend substantial resources or discontinue certain service offerings, which could negatively affect our operating results. In addition, the increased attention focused upon liability issues as a result of these lawsuits and legislative proposals could harm our reputation and affect our ability to attract clients. 31 Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a report containing management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources. The LiquidityOne Transformation program, as well as other changes in our business, including initiatives to invest in information systems or to transition particular functions to third party providers, will necessitate modifications to our internal controls. We cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting, or any changes to be made, will be sufficient to enable management to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, market perception of our financial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and client perception of our business may suffer. Our internal control policies and procedures may not always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, agents or third parties with whom we work. Internal controls may become less effective over time as a result of, among other things, changes in conditions, failures to comply with our policies and procedures or new business that strains our system of internal controls. Changes in accounting and reporting policies or practices may affect our financial results, which may affect our stock price. Our accounting policies are fundamental to determining and understanding our financial results and condition. Some of these policies require our management to use estimates and make subjective and complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Factors may arise over time that lead us to change our estimates and judgments. In some cases, our management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which may be reasonable under the circumstances, yet may result in us reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative. Any changes in accounting policies or methods could reduce our net income, which reductions may be independent of changes in our operations. These reductions in reported net income could cause our stock price to decline. For example, our operating results for the fourth quarter, and full fiscal year 2016 have been affected by our recording of a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets and by our recording of an impairment of goodwill. The success of our business depends on our ability to market quality products that meet our customers’ needs. Our business relies on continued demand for the products we offer. To compete effectively, we must offer products that appeal to our customers. This is dependent on a number of factors, including our ability to acquire products that meet the quality, performance and price expectations of our customers and our ability to develop effective sales, advertising and marketing programs. Failure to continue to offer competitive products to the marketplace, to supply products that meet applicable regulatory requirements, or to predict market demands for, or gain market acceptance of, such products, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We expect IronDirect’s business will be highly sensitive to general economic conditions and economic conditions in the industries it will serve. The construction equipment industry is cyclical and its revenues are closely tied to general economic conditions and to conditions in the non-residential construction industry in particular. As a 32 result, we expect demand for IronDirect’s products and services will be cyclical and may be significantly reduced in an economic environment characterized by lower levels of government and business investment, lower levels of business confidence, lower corporate earnings, perceived or actual industry overcapacity, higher unemployment and lower consumer spending. A prolonged period of slow growth may also reduce demand for IronDirect’s products and services. Economic conditions affecting the industries IronDirect will serve may lead to reduced capital expenditures by its customers which may, in turn, lead to a decrease in the demand for IronDirect’s products and services. We expect IronDirect’s customers will operate in the non-residential construction and oil and gas end-markets and, to a lesser extent, in industrial activity and residential construction end-markets. These are cyclical businesses that are sensitive to changes in general economic conditions. Weakness in these end-markets, such as a decline in non-residential construction, oil and gas end-markets or industrial activity, may lead to a decrease in the demand for IronDirect’s equipment or the prices we can charge. Factors that may cause weakness in these end-markets include: (cid:129) weakness in the economy, decreases in the market value of real estate or the onset of a new recession; (cid:129) slowdowns in residential construction and/or non-residential construction; (cid:129) continued decline and/or volatility in oil and gas prices as well as slowdowns in the oil and gas industry; (cid:129) reductions in spending levels by customers; (cid:129) unfavorable credit markets affecting end-user access to capital; (cid:129) adverse changes in the federal and local government infrastructure spending; (cid:129) increases in the cost of construction materials; (cid:129) increases in interest rates; and (cid:129) terrorism or hostilities involving the United States. In addition, the cyclicality of the construction equipment industry may make it more difficult for us to forecast trends. Uncertainty regarding future product demand could cause us to maintain excess equipment inventory, which will increase our equipment inventory costs. Alternatively, if we are not able to predict periods of increased demand, we may lose customers if we do not have enough equipment to satisfy demand. We plan to provide financing and credit support for some of our customers. We assist customers in their rental, leasing and acquisition of products sold through our IronDirect and TruckCenter business. We intend to provide financing for some of our customers, primarily in the U.S., to acquire vehicles and equipment through loans, sales-type leases, and operating leases. We may enter into these financing agreements with the intent either to hold the financing until maturity or to sell the financing to a third party within a short time period. Until such financing obligations are satisfied through either customer payments or a third-party sale, we retain the risks associated with such customer financing. Our results could be adversely affected if such customers default on their contractual obligations to us, if the residual values of such equipment on these transactions decline below the original estimated values or we are unable to sell the financing receivable to a third party. In addition, we expect our customers, from time to time, may fund the acquisition of equipment or vehicles through third-party finance companies. In certain instances, we may provide credit guarantees, residual value guarantees or buyback guarantees. With these guarantees, we must assess the probability of losses or non-performance in ways similar to the evaluation of accounts receivable, including consideration of a customer’s payment history, leverage, availability of third party financing, political 33 and currency exchange risks, and other factors. Many of these factors, including the assessment of a customer’s ability to pay, are influenced by economic and market factors that cannot be predicted with certainty. In circumstances where we believe it is probable that a specific customer will have difficulty meeting its financial obligations, we will record a specific reserve to recognize a liability for a guarantee we expect to pay, taking into account any amounts that we anticipate realizing if we are forced to repossess the equipment that supports the customer’s financial obligations to us. During periods of economic weakness, the collateral underlying our guarantees of indebtedness of customers or receivables can decline sharply, which would increase our exposure to losses. In the future, we may incur losses in excess of our recorded reserves if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate further or the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale of the collateral supporting our customers’ financial obligations is not realized. To date, losses related to guarantees have been negligible; however, there can be no assurance that our historical experience with respect to guarantees will be indicative of future results. Our stock price has been volatile, and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value. The worldwide financial crisis led to an increase in the overall volatility of the stock market. Despite improved stock market performance, the increased volatility and other broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. Other factors that could cause fluctuation in our stock price may include: (cid:129) actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results; (cid:129) changes in financial estimates by us or by a securities analyst who covers our stock; (cid:129) publication of research reports about our company or industry; (cid:129) conditions or trends in our industry; (cid:129) stock market price and volume fluctuations of other publicly traded companies and, in particular, those whose business involves the Internet and e-commerce; (cid:129) announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts (or the amendment or loss of such contracts), acquisitions, commercial relationships, strategic partnerships or divestitures; (cid:129) announcements by us or our competitors of technological innovations, new services or service enhancements; (cid:129) announcements of investigations or regulatory scrutiny of our operations or lawsuits filed against us; (cid:129) the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us, our clients or our industry; (cid:129) additions or departures of key personnel; (cid:129) sales of our common stock, including sales of our common stock by our directors and officers or specific stockholders; and (cid:129) general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets. Volatility in the market price of shares may prevent investors from being able to sell their shares of common stock at prices they view as attractive. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources. 34 Some provisions of our charter, bylaws and Delaware law inhibit potential acquisition bids that you may consider favorable. Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that may enable our board of directors to resist a change in control of our company even if a change in control were to be considered favorable by you and other stockholders. These provisions include: (cid:129) a staggered board of directors; (cid:129) a prohibition on actions by our stockholders by written consent; (cid:129) limitations on persons authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders; (cid:129) the authorization of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval; (cid:129) advance notice procedures required for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders; and (cid:129) the requirement that board vacancies be filled by a majority of our directors then in office. These provisions could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. In addition, our bylaws provide that the Delaware Court of Chancery will be the exclusive forum for certain types of legal action (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court within Delaware). This provision may make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to challenge certain corporate actions we take. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. Not Applicable 35 Item 2. Properties. We lease the following properties: Purpose Location Square Feet Lease Expiration Date Corporate Headquarters Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse Administrative Administrative Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse Storage Lot Warehouse Administrative Administrative Storage Lot Storage Lot Storage Lot Storage Lot Storage Lot Testing Facility Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse Administrative Warehouse Washington, D.C., USA Dallas, Texas, USA Plainfield, Indiana, USA North Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Scottsdale, Arizona, USA Plano, Texas USA Obetz, Ohio, USA Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA Columbus, Ohio, USA Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA Montgomery, Alabama, USA Houston, Texas, USA Fontana, California, USA Blue Mound, Texas, USA Indianapolis, Indiana, USA Atlanta, Georgia, USA Wilmington, Delaware, USA Asheville, NC, USA Hayward, California, USA Hazelwood, Missouri, USA Atlanta, Georgia, USA London, GBR Brampton, Canada 27,250 September 30, 2019 127,144 December 31, 2020 187,704 April 30, 2019 102,400 March 31, 2021 February 28, 2019 June 30, 2021 23,536 December 31, 2016 12,234 December 31, 2021 340,000 319,000 516,174 December 31,2016 435,600 122,200 Month to Month 11,356 12,422 March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 June 30, 2021 511,830 May 31, 2018 727,500 May 31, 2018 697,000 May 31, 2018 479,200 May 31, 2018 484,000 May 31, 2018 1,502,820 December 31, 2016 24,600 October 31, 2018 21,368 December 31, 2016 47,636 May 31, 2018 July 12, 2017 6,036 February 28, 2017 53,621 In addition, we lease various administrative spaces in North America totaling 46,714 square feet, in Europe, 4,864 square feet, and in Asia, 9,088 square feet. We also own a 420,000 square feet warehouse located in North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, USA. Our servers are housed in data centers in Ashburn, Virginia, which is managed by Equinix, Inc. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Howard v. Liquidity Services, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 14-1183 (D. D. C. 2014). On July 14, 2014, Leonard Howard filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the ‘‘District Court’’) against the Company and its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief accounting officer, on behalf of stockholders who purchased the Company’s common stock between February 1, 2012, and May 7, 2014. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by, among other things, misrepresenting the Company’s growth initiative, growth potential, and financial and operating conditions, thereby artificially inflating its share price, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and costs and expenses, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees. On October 14, 2014, the Court appointed Caisse de D´epˆot et Placement du Qu´ebec and the Newport News Employees’ Retirement Fund as co-lead plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on December 15, 2014, which alleges substantially similar claims but which does not name the chief accounting officer as a defendant. On March 2, 2015, the Company moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim or plead fraud with the requisite particularity. On March 31, 2016, 36 the Court granted that motion in part and denied it in part. On May 16, 2016, the Company answered the amended complaint. Pursuant to the scheduling order in this action, document production shall be substantially complete by January 13, 2017, class certification shall be fully briefed by May 2, 2017, all fact discovery shall be completed by August 31, 2017, and expert discovery shall be completed by February 23, 2018. The Company believes the allegations in the amended complaint are without merit and cannot estimate a range of potential liability, if any, at this time. Billard v. Angrick, et al., Civ. No. 16-1612-BAH (D. D. C. 2016) and Slingerland v. Angrick, et al., Civ. No. 16-1725-BAH (D. D. C. 2016). Two of the Company’s stockholders filed putative derivative actions on behalf of the Company against certain individuals who served on the Company’s Board of Directors or as members of its management between 2012 and 2014. The cases are pending in the District Court. On June 8, 2016, Harold Slingerland filed a putative derivative complaint in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (the ‘‘Superior Court’’), purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain individuals who served on the Company’s Board of Directors or as members of the Company’s management between February 1, 2012, and May 7, 2014. The complaint asserted that, among other things, the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders by supposedly causing or allowing the Company to make the same misstatements that are alleged in the putative class action complaint and exposing the Company to potentially significant costs and expenses in connection with defending that action. The complaint sought monetary damages from the defendants other than the Company, changes to the Company’s corporate governance, disgorgement of any profits, benefits, or other compensation obtained by the director defendants, and an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses for plaintiff’s counsel. The plaintiff in this putative derivative action never served his complaint and, on August 3, 2016, the action was voluntarily dismissed. On August 8, 2016, Thomas Billard filed a putative derivative complaint in the District Court, which challenges conduct similar to that challenged in the Slingerland complaint filed in the Superior Court, and which asserts claims against the Company’s Board and certain former Board members and members of management. The Billard complaint asserts derivative claims for breach of fiduciary, waste, unjust enrichment, and insider trading. On August 24, 2016, the District Court entered a briefing schedule pursuant to which the defendants shall move to dismiss the Billard complaint solely on forum non conveniens grounds based on a Delaware forum selection clause contained in the Company’s bylaws, without prejudice to any other grounds for dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b) or 23.1. This motion is fully briefed and awaiting decision. On August 25, 2016, the Slingerland plaintiff filed a putative derivative complaint in the District Court that alleges substantially the same claims as raised in the Billard derivative complaint. On October 21, 2016, the Court entered an order staying the defendants’ obligation to respond to this complaint to and including January 19, 2017. On September 23, 2016, the plaintiffs and defendants in the Billard and Slingerland actions filed a proposed stipulation and order that would consolidate the two actions into a ‘‘Consolidated Action’’ and that provides that defendants’ motion to dismiss the Billard complaint on forum non conveniens grounds is deemed to have been made in the Consolidated Action. The proposed stipulation and order further provides that if defendants’ motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds is denied, the parties to the Consolidated Action shall submit a proposed order setting forth a deadline for the filing of a consolidated complaint and subsequent motions and deadline. The Company believes the allegations in both complaints are without merit and cannot estimate a range of potential liability, if any, at this time. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable. 37 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases PART II of Equity Securities. Price Range of Common Stock Our common stock has been traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol LQDT since February 23, 2006. The following table sets forth the intra-day high and low per share bid price of our common stock as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market for the periods indicated. Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 Low High First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.41 $7.32 $8.60 $6.65 $13.80 $10.50 $11.00 $ 9.89 Fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.20 $4.42 $5.10 $7.06 $ 9.19 $ 6.58 $ 7.84 $11.25 As of October 28, 2016, there were approximately 8,250 beneficial holders of our common stock and 17 holders of record of our common stock. Dividend Policy Since becoming a public company on February 22, 2006, we have not paid cash dividends on our stock and currently anticipate that we will continue to retain any future earnings to finance the growth of our business. 38 COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Liquidity Services, Inc, the Russell 2000 Index, the S&P Smallcap 600 Index, and a Peer Group $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 9/11 12/11 3/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15 9/15 12/15 3/16 6/16 9/16 Liquidity Services, Inc Russell 2000 S&P Smallcap 600 9NOV201613004602 Peer Group * $100 invested on 9/30/11 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending September 30. Copyright(cid:4) 2016 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.Copyright(cid:4) 2016 Russell Investment Group. All rights reserved. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. You should read the following selected consolidated financial data together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and with ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,’’ included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2015 and 2016 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, our consolidated financial statements that have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and that are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2012, 2013 39 and 2014 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Profit-sharing distributions . . . . . . . . . . Technology and operations . . . . . . . . . . Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets . . . . . . Business disposition loss . . . . . . . . . . . Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . Interest income (expense) and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per common share: Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 415,829 59,475 475,304 $ 404,041 101,815 505,856 $ 388,671 106,990 495,661 $ 315,668 81,457 397,125 $ 233,828 82,626 316,454 198,123 43,242 67,553 31,252 37,107 14,166 1,695 — 393,138 82,166 199,494 35,944 90,052 40,170 48,950 17,374 5,921 — 437,905 67,951 211,659 35,055 108,940 41,951 49,428 16,595 (18,384) — 445,244 50,417 166,009 28,093 99,743 41,465 41,418 9,235 147,414 7,963 541,340 (144,215) 143,127 11,214 93,405 37,570 39,717 6,502 19,037 — 350,572 (34,118) (2,218) 704 (370) (171) 1,217 79,948 31,652 48,296 1.57 1.47 $ $ $ 68,655 27,551 41,104 1.30 1.26 $ $ $ $ $ $ 50,047 19,657 (144,386) (39,571) (32,901) 27,025 30,390 $ (104,815) $ (59,926) 0.97 0.97 $ $ (3.50) $ (1.96) (3.50) $ (1.96) Basic weighted average shares outstanding . 30,854,796 31,616,926 31,243,932 29,987,985 30,638,163 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,783,079 32,657,236 31,395,301 29,987,985 30,638,163 Non-GAAP Financial Measures: EBITDA from continuing operations(1) . . Adjusted EBITDA from continuing $ 96,332 $ 85,325 $ 67,012 $ (134,980) $ (27,616) operations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110,144 104,625 63,013 33,075 3,668 Supplemental Operating Data: Gross merchandise volume from continuing operations(2) . . . . . . . . . . . Completed transactions(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . Total registered buyers(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . Total auction participants(5) . . . . . . . . . . $ 864,226 501,000 2,186,000 2,105,000 $ 973,325 530,000 2,424,000 2,458,000 $ 931,556 547,000 2,615,000 2,538,000 $ 798,977 567,000 2,845,000 2,483,000 $ 642,078 574,000 2,986,000 2,417,000 40 As of September 30, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (in thousands) Consolidated Balance Sheet Data Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments . . . . . Working capital(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $104,782 53,194 400,408 150,405 250,003 $ 95,109 79,289 421,344 106,465 314,879 $ 62,598 77,935 431,718 114,735 316,983 $ 95,465 119,225 288,488 72,486 216,002 $134,513 99,424 260,109 97,498 162,611 (1) EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. GAAP means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. EBITDA is equal to net income plus (a) interest income (expense) and other income (expense), net; (b) provision for income taxes; (c) amortization of contract intangibles; and (d) depreciation and amortization. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA because we further adjust EBITDA for stock based compensation expense, acquisition costs such as transaction expenses and changes in earn out estimates, business realignment expense, goodwill and long-lived assets impairment, and business disposition loss. For a description of our use of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to net income, see the discussion and related table below. (2) Gross merchandise volume is the total sales value of all merchandise sold through our marketplaces during a given period. (3) Completed transactions represent the number of auctions in a given period from which we have recorded revenue. (4) Total registered buyers as of a given date represent the aggregate number of persons or entities who have registered on one of our marketplaces. (5) For each auction we manage, the number of auction participants represents the total number of registered buyers who have bid one or more times on that auction, and total auction participants for a given period is the sum of the auction participants in each auction conducted during that period. (6) Working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. We believe non-GAAP financial measures, such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, are useful to an investor in evaluating our performance for the following reasons: (cid:129) The amortization of contract intangibles relates to the amortization of the Scrap Contract beginning in June 2005, the Wal-Mart Agreement beginning in October 2011, and an assumed contract associated with the National Electronic Service Association (NESA) acquisition on November 1, 2012. Depreciation and amortization expense primarily relates to property and equipment. Both of these expenses are non-cash charges that have significantly fluctuated over the past five years. As a result, we believe that adding back these non-cash charges to net income is useful in evaluating the operating performance of our business on a consistent basis from year to year. (cid:129) As a result of varying federal and state income tax rates, we believe that presenting a financial measure that adjusts net income for provision for income taxes is useful to investors when evaluating the operating performance of our business on a consistent basis from year to year. (cid:129) The authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights to be recognized in the income statement based on their estimated fair values. We believe adjusting net income for this stock-based compensation expense is useful to investors when evaluating the operating performance of our business on a consistent basis from year to year. (cid:129) We believe adjusting net income for acquisition and disposition related transaction expenses and changes in contingent consideration is useful to investors when evaluating the operating performance of our business on a consistent basis from year to year. 41 (cid:129) We believe adjusting net income for business realignment expense is useful to investors when evaluating the operating performance of our business on a consistent basis from year-to-year, as these expenses are infrequent in nature and have been incurred only twice in the financial periods presented. (cid:129) We believe isolating non-cash charges, such as amortization and depreciation, and other items, such as impairment costs incurred outside our ordinary course of business, provides additional information about our cost structure, and, over time, helps track our performance. (cid:129) We believe EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are important indicators of our operational strength and the performance of our business because they provide a link between profitability and operating cash flow. (cid:129) We also believe that analysts and investors use EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as supplemental measures to evaluate the overall operating performance of companies in our industry. Our management uses EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA: (cid:129) as measurements of operating performance because they assist us in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis as they remove the impact of items not directly resulting from our core operations; (cid:129) for planning purposes, including the preparation of our internal annual operating budget; (cid:129) to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; (cid:129) to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational strategies; and (cid:129) to evaluate our capacity to fund capital expenditures and expand our business. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as calculated by us are not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. In addition, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA: (a) do not represent net income or cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP; (b) are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash flow needs; and (c) should not be considered as alternatives to net income, income from operations, cash provided by operating activities or our other financial information as determined under GAAP. We prepare adjusted EBITDA by adjusting EBITDA to eliminate the impact of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. As an analytical tool, adjusted EBITDA is subject to all of the limitations applicable to EBITDA. Our presentation of adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an implication that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. 42 The table below reconciles income from continuing operations to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations for the periods presented. Net income (loss) from continuing operations . Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . EBITDA from continuing operations . . . . . . . Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business disposition loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business realignment expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 48,296 2,218 31,652 14,166 96,332 12,117 $ 41,104 (704) 27,551 17,374 (in thousands) $ 30,390 370 19,657 16,595 $(104,815) $(59,926) (1,217) 27,025 6,502 171 (39,571) 9,235 85,325 13,379 67,012 12,605 (134,980) 12,405 (27,616) 12,247 1,695 — — 5,921 — — (18,384) — 1,780 147,414 7,963 273 19,037 — — Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations $110,144 $104,625 $ 63,013 $ 33,075 $ 3,668 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information contained under the caption ‘‘Selected Consolidated Financial Data’’ contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could vary materially from those indicated, implied, or suggested by these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Overview About us. We employ innovative e-commerce marketplace solutions to manage, value, and sell inventory and equipment for business and government clients. We operate a network of leading e-commerce marketplaces that enable buyers and sellers to transact in an efficient, automated environment offering over 500 product categories. The Company’s marketplaces provide professional buyers access to a global, organized supply of new, surplus, and scrap assets presented with digital images and other relevant product information. Additionally, the Company enables its corporate and government sellers to enhance their financial return on assets offered for sale by providing a liquid marketplace and value-added services that encompass the consultative management, valuation, and sale of surplus assets. Our broad range of services include program management, valuation, asset management, reconciliation, RTV and RMA (‘‘Return to Vendor’’ and ‘‘Returns Management Authorization’’), refurbishment and recycling, fulfillment, marketing and sales, warehousing and transportation, buyer customer support, and compliance and risk mitigation. We organize the products on our marketplaces into categories across major industry verticals such as consumer electronics, general merchandise, apparel, scientific equipment, aerospace parts and equipment, technology hardware, energy equipment, industrial capital assets, fleet and transportation equipment and specialty equipment. Our network of marketplaces includes: www.liquidation.com, www.govliquidation.com, www.govdeals.com, www.networkintl.com, www.truckcenter.com, www.secondipity.com, www.go-dove.com, and www.irondirect.com. We have over 8,000 clients, including Fortune 1000 and Global 500 organizations as well as government agencies. We have one reportable segment consisting of operating e-commerce marketplaces for sellers and buyers of new, surplus, and scrap assets. 43 We believe our ability to create liquid marketplaces for surplus and salvage assets generates a continuous flow of goods from our corporate and government sellers. This valuable and reliable flow of goods in turn attracts an increasing number of professional buyers to our marketplaces. During fiscal year 2016, the number of registered buyers grew from approximately 2,845,000 to approximately 2,986,000, or 5.0%. During the past three fiscal years, we have conducted over 1,688,000 online transactions generating approximately $2.4 billion in gross merchandise volume or GMV. We believe the continuous flow of goods in our marketplaces attracts a growing buyer base which creates a virtual cycle for our buyers and sellers. Our history. We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1999 as Liquidation.com, Inc. and commenced operations in early 2000. During 2000, we developed our ecommerce marketplace platform and began auctioning merchandise primarily for small commercial sellers and government agencies. In 2001, we changed our name to Liquidity Services, Inc. In June 2001, we were awarded our first major Department of Defense (DoD) contract, the Surplus Contract. Under this agreement, we became the exclusive contractor with the DLA Disposition Services, for the sale of usable DoD surplus assets in the United States. In June 2005, we were awarded an additional exclusive contract with the DLA Disposition Services to manage and sell substantially all DoD scrap property. During 2005, we opened our first distribution center in Dallas, Texas and began serving the reverse logistics needs of top 100 retailers. Our revenue. We offer our sellers three primary transaction models: a Purchase model, a Consignment model, and an Other model. (cid:129) Purchase model. Under our purchase model, we offer our sellers a fixed amount or the option to share a portion of the proceeds received from our completed sales in the form of a distribution. Distributions are calculated based on the value we receive from the sale after deducting a required return to us that we have negotiated with the seller. Because we are the primary obligor, and take general and physical inventory risks and credit risk under this transaction model, we recognize as revenue the sale price paid by the buyer upon completion of a transaction. Revenue from our purchase model accounted for approximately 64.0%, 64.1%, and 63.7% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The merchandise sold under our purchase model accounted for approximately 34.6%, 32.7%, and 30.4% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. (cid:129) Consignment model—fee revenue. Under our consignment model, we recognize commission revenue from sales of merchandise in our marketplaces that is owned by others. These commissions, which we refer to as seller commissions, represent a percentage of the sale price the buyer pays upon completion of a transaction. We vary the percentage amount of the seller commission depending on the various value-added services we provide to the seller to facilitate the transaction. For example, we generally increase the percentage amount of the seller commission if we take possession, handle, ship and / or provide enhanced product information for the merchandise. We collect the seller commission by deducting the appropriate amount from the sales proceeds prior to the distribution to the seller after completion of the transaction. Revenue from our consignment model accounted for approximately 21.6%, 20.6%, and 20.9% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, and is recorded as fee revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The merchandise sold under our consignment model accounted for approximately 57.7%, 59.7%, and 64.6% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. (cid:129) Other. The Other category includes revenue from profit-sharing arrangements as well as non-consignment fee revenue. Under our profit-sharing model, we purchase inventory from our suppliers and share with them a portion of the profits received from a completed sale in the 44 form of a distribution. Distributions are calculated based on the value received from the sale after deducting allowable costs, such as sales and marketing, technology and operations and other general and administrative costs. Because we are the primary obligor, and take general and physical inventory risks and credit risk under this transaction model, we recognize as revenue the sale price paid by the buyer upon completion of a transaction. Other revenue accounted for approximately 14.4%, 15.3%, and 15.4% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, and approximately 7.7%, 7.6%, and 5.0% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. We collect a buyer premium on substantially all of our transactions under all of our transaction models. Buyer premiums are calculated as a percentage of the sale price of the merchandise sold and are paid to us by the buyer. Buyer premiums are in addition to the price of the merchandise. Under our profit-sharing model, we typically share the proceeds of any buyer premiums with our sellers. Industry trends. We believe there are several industry trends impacting the growth of our business including: (1) the increase in the adoption of the Internet by businesses to conduct e-commerce both in the United States and abroad; (2) in the near term the decrease in the volume, innovation, and price of consumer electronic products, resulting in lower supply from our retail clients and lower per unit prices and margins in our retail goods marketplace, although in the long term we expect innovation in the retail supply chain will increase the pace of product obsolescence and, therefore, the supply of surplus assets; (3) the increase in the volume of returned merchandise handled by both online and offline retailers; (4) the increase in government regulations and the need for corporations to have sustainability solutions necessitating verifiable recycling and remarketing of surplus assets; (5) the increase in outsourcing by corporate and government organizations of disposition activities for surplus and end-of-life assets as they focus on reducing costs, improving transparency, compliance and working capital flows, and increasingly prefer service providers with a proven track record, innovative scalable solutions and the ability to make a strategic impact in the reverse supply chain, which we expect to increase our seller base; and (6) an increase in buyer demand for surplus merchandise as consumers trade down by purchasing less expensive goods and seek greater value from their purchases, which results in lower per unit prices and margins in our retail goods vertical. Our Seller Agreements Our DoD agreements. We have two contracts with the DoD pursuant to which we acquire, manage and sell excess property: (cid:129) Surplus Contract. The Surplus Contract (third awarded to us since 2001) is a competitive-bid contract under which we acquire, manage and sell usable DoD surplus personal property turned into the DLA. Surplus property generally consists of items determined by the DoD to be no longer needed, and not claimed for reuse by any federal agency, such as computers, electronics, office supplies, scientific and medical equipment, aircraft parts, clothing and textiles. The Surplus Contract requires us to purchase all usable surplus property offered by the DoD at 4.35% of the DoD’s original acquisition value (OAV). The current, or third, Surplus Contract became effective December 2014, covers only non-rolling stock and has a base term of two years with four one-year options to extend. The prior, or second, Surplus Contract required us to purchase all rolling and non-rolling usable surplus property offered by the DoD at 1.8% of the DoD’s OAV; the wind-down period under the second Surplus Contract will remain in effect until January 2017 to allow for the continued processing of usable Recycling Control Point (RCP) non-rolling stock surplus property. The Surplus Contract accounted for 26.8%, 24.7% and 31.0% of our revenue and 14.3%, 12.3% and 12.7% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. 45 The DoD has broad discretion to determine what property will be made available for sale to us under the Surplus Contract and may retrieve or restrict property previously sold to us for national security, public safety, or other reasons or if the property is otherwise needed to support the mission of the DoD. (cid:129) Scrap Contract. In June 2005 the Company was awarded the original Scrap Contract which was structured as a profit-sharing arrangement with 75.2% of the profits distributed to the DLA, and 1.8% to a third party. The contract was amended in June 2015 to adjust the DLA profit sharing percentage to 65.0%, eliminating the distribution to the third party. The Scrap Contract is a competitive-bid contract under which we acquire, manage and sell substantially all scrap property of the DoD turned into the DLA. Scrap property generally consists of items determined by the DoD to have no value beyond their base material content value, such as metals, alloys, and building materials. Under the first Scrap Contract, we acquired scrap property at a per pound price and disbursed to the DLA a percentage of the profits, currently 65% of the amount realized from the sale of the inventory, after deduction for allowable expenses. We refer to these disbursement payments to the DoD as profit-sharing distributions. We recognized as revenue the gross proceeds from these sales. The DoD reimbursed us for certain direct expenses deemed to be payable by the DoD rather than by us. During fiscal 2015, if the Company’s customer base met certain small business criteria as defined in the contract, we received an additional incentive payment which was withheld from payments to the DLA. The prior Scrap Contract expired on September 30, 2016. On April 8, 2016, the DLA awarded the second Scrap Contract to the Company. Under the second Scrap Contract, the Company acquires scrap property from the DLA and pay the DLA a revenue-sharing payment equal to 64.5% of the gross resale proceeds. The Company bears all of the costs for the sorting, merchandising and sale of the property. The second Scrap Contract has a 36-month base term, commencing in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with two 12-month extension options exercisable by the DLA. The Scrap Contract accounted for 14.4%, 15.3% and 10.2% of our revenue and 7.7%, 7.6% and 5.0% of our GMV for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Our Commercial Agreements We have various contracts with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., under which we purchase certain consumer products from Wal-Mart that have been removed from the sales stream of its retail operations. All of these agreements have customary commercial terms, which generally expire within a year and allow both parties to terminate for convenience with reasonable notice. We also had a long-term contract with Wal-Mart that was terminated effective December 8, 2014. As part of a final settlement of claims Wal-Mart paid us $7.5 million in February 2015. On September 30, 2015, we sold certain assets related to the Jacobs Trading Company to a buyer, Tanager Acquisitions, LLC. In connection with the disposition, the buyer assumed certain liabilities related to the Jacobs Trading Company. The buyer issued to us a promissory note in the amount of $12.3 million. The divestiture of the Jacobs Trading Company resulted in an $8.0 million loss. The sale generated a tax loss that resulted in a $30.9 million cash benefit from prior year income taxes. In fiscal year 2016, we received $30.1 million of tax refunds related to this cash benefit, plus an additional $5.0 million for an overpayment of taxes paid in fiscal year 2015. During fiscal year 2016, we had over 600 corporate clients who each sold in excess of $10,000 of surplus and salvage assets in our marketplaces. Our agreements with these clients are generally terminable at will by either party. 46 Key Business Metrics Our management periodically reviews certain key business metrics for operational planning purposes and to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational strategies, allocation of resources and our capacity to fund capital expenditures and expand our business. These key business metrics include: Gross merchandise volume. Gross merchandise volume, or GMV, is the total sales value of all merchandise sold through our marketplaces during a given period. We review GMV because it provides a measure of the volume of goods being sold in our marketplaces and thus the activity of those marketplaces. GMV also provides a means to evaluate the effectiveness of investments that we have made and continue to make, including in the areas of customer support, value-added services, product development, sales and marketing, and operations. The GMV of goods sold in our marketplace during fiscal year 2016 totaled $642.1 million. Completed transactions. Completed transactions represents the number of auctions in a given period from which we have recorded revenue. Similar to GMV, we believe that completed transactions is a key business metric because it provides an additional measurement of the volume of activity flowing through our marketplaces. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we completed approximately 574,000 transactions. Total registered buyers. We grow our buyer base through a combination of marketing and promotional efforts. A person becomes a registered buyer by completing an online registration process on one of our marketplaces. As part of this process, we collect business and personal information, including name, title, company name, business address and contact information, and information on how the person intends to use our marketplaces. Each prospective buyer must also accept our terms and conditions of use. Following the completion of the online registration process, we verify each prospective buyer’s e-mail address and confirm that the person is not listed on any banned persons list maintained internally or by the U.S. federal government. After the verification process, which is completed generally within 24 hours, the registration is approved and activated and the prospective buyer is added to our registered buyer list. Total registered buyers, as of a given date, represents the aggregate number of persons or entities who have registered on one of our marketplaces. We use this metric to evaluate how well our marketing and promotional efforts are performing. Total registered buyers excludes duplicate registrations, buyers who are suspended from utilizing our marketplaces and those buyers who have voluntarily removed themselves from our registration database. In addition, if we become aware of registered buyers that are no longer in business, we remove them from our database. As of September 30, 2016, we had approximately 2,986,000 registered buyers. Total auction participants. For each auction we manage, the number of auction participants represents the total number of registered buyers who have bid one or more times in that auction. As a result, a registered buyer who bids, or participates, in more than one auction is counted as an auction participant in each auction in which he or she participates. Thus, total auction participants for a given period is the sum of the auction participants in each auction conducted during that period. We use this metric to allow us to compare our ecommerce marketplaces to our competitors, including other ecommerce auction sites and traditional on-site auctioneers. In addition, we measure total auction participants on a periodic basis to evaluate the activity level of our base of registered buyers and to measure the performance of our marketing and promotional efforts. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, approximately 2,417,000 total auction participants participated in auctions on our marketplaces. 47 Critical Accounting Estimates Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. A ‘‘critical accounting estimate’’ is one which is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We continuously evaluate our critical accounting estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Revenue recognition. For transactions in our marketplaces, which generate substantially all of our revenue, we recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (cid:129) a buyer submits the winning bid in an auction and, as a result, evidence of an arrangement exists and the sale price has been determined; (cid:129) the buyer has assumed risks and rewards of ownership; and (cid:129) collection is reasonably assured. Most of our sales are recorded subsequent to receipt of payment authorization, utilizing credit cards, wire transfers and PayPal, an Internet based payment system, as methods of payments. As a result, we are not subject to significant collection risk, as goods are generally not shipped before payment is received. Revenue is also evaluated to determine whether to report the gross proceeds as revenue (when we act as the principal in the arrangement) or report our net commissions and related fees as revenue (when we act as an agent). In arrangements in which we are deemed to be the primary obligor, bear physical and general inventory risk, and credit risk, we recognize as revenue the gross proceeds from the sale, including buyer’s premiums. For Arrangements in which we act as an agent or broker on a consignment basis, without taking general or physical inventory risk, revenue is recognized based on the sales commissions that are paid to us by the sellers for utilizing our services; in this situation, sales commissions represent a percentage of the gross proceeds from the sale that the seller pays to us upon completion of the transaction. We also recognize buyer premiums in consignment arrangements. We have evaluated our revenue recognition policy related to sales under our profit-sharing model and determined it is appropriate to account for these sales on a gross basis. The following factors were most heavily relied upon in our determination: (cid:129) We are the primary obligor in the arrangement, and we have general inventory risk. (cid:129) We are the seller in substance and in appearance to the buyer; the buyer contacts us if there is a problem with the purchase. Only we and the buyer are parties to the sales contract and the buyer has no recourse to the supplier. If the buyer has a problem, he or she looks to us, not the supplier. (cid:129) The buyer does not and cannot look to the supplier for fulfillment or for product acceptability concerns. (cid:129) We take title to the inventory upon paying the amount set forth in the contract with the supplier. Such amount is generally a percentage of the supplier’s original acquisition cost under 48 our Surplus Contract, a percentage of the supplier’s last retail price under certain commercial contracts and varies depending on the type of the inventory purchased or a fixed price per pound under our Scrap Contract. (cid:129) We are at risk of loss for all amounts paid to the supplier in the event the property is damaged or otherwise becomes unsaleable. In addition, as payments made for inventory are excluded from the calculation for the profit-sharing distribution under our DoD contracts, we effectively bear inventory risk for the full amount paid to acquire the property (i.e., there is no sharing of inventory risk). In fiscal year 2016, approximately 11.1% of our revenue was generated outside of the U.S. Business combinations. We recognize all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. Acquisition- related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. Restructuring costs incurred in periods subsequent to the acquisition date are expensed and changes to the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in the statement of operations subsequent to the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the purchase price (i.e., working capital adjustments) or other fair value adjustments determined during the measurement period are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill. All subsequent changes to a valuation allowance or uncertain tax position that relate to the acquired company and existed at the acquisition date that occur both within the measurement period and as a result of facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date are recognized as an adjustment to goodwill. All other changes in valuation allowances are recognized as a reduction or increase to income tax expense or as a direct adjustment to additional paid-in-capital as required. Valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets. We identify and value intangible assets that we acquire in business combinations, such as customer arrangements, customer relationships and non-compete agreements, that arise from contractual or other legal rights or that are capable of being separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. The fair value of identified intangible assets is based upon an estimate of the future economic benefits expected to result from ownership, which represents the amount at which the assets could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. We test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate impairment may exist. We test our long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Examples of such events or circumstances could include a significant change in business climate, a loss of significant customers, or a significant decline in stock price. With regard to goodwill we first make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether we should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. If our qualitative evaluation indicates a likelihood of goodwill impairment, we apply a two-step fair value-based test to assess goodwill for impairment. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the test is then performed. The second step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of the the reporting unit, an impairment loss would be recorded in our statements of operations. With regard to long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets, they are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment only if events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be realizable. Our management makes certain estimates and assumptions in order to determine the fair value of net assets and liabilities, including, among other things, an assessment of market conditions, projected cash flows, cost of capital and growth rates, which could significantly impact the reported value of goodwill, long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment, and our projections may vary from cash flows eventually realized. Valuations 49 prepared by management employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value, corroborated by comparisons to market information. These valuations are based on a discount rate determined by our management to be consistent with industry discount rates and the risks inherent in our current business model. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgments about the appropriate discount rates, terminal growth rates, weighted average costs of capital, exit multiples, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The judgments used in determining the fair value of our reporting units are based on significant unobservable inputs which causes the determination of the implied fair value of goodwill to fall within level three of the GAAP fair value hierarchy. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow analysis are based on the most recent budgets, forecasts, and business plans as well as various growth rate assumptions for years beyond the current business plan period. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future revenue streams and cash flows of the reporting unit. Various factors, including the failure to successfully implement our business plan for any of our reporting units, as well as other factors beyond our control, could have a negative effect on the fair value of such reporting unit, and increase the risk of further impairments of goodwill in the future. A reporting unit represents a component of an operating segment that (a) constitutes a business, (b) has discrete financial information, and (c) its performance is reviewed by management. At fiscal year-end 2015, the Company had two reporting units—LSI-Retail Supply Chain Group (RSCG) and LSI-Capital Assets Group (CAG). During fiscal year 2016, in light of new business ventures and management restructuring, the Company concluded it now has five reporting units—RSCG, CAG, LSI-GovDeals, LSI-Truckcenter, and LSI-IronDirect. In previous years we performed the annual goodwill impairment assessment as of September 30, which is the end of our fiscal year. However, during fiscal year 2016, the Company made a voluntary change in the method of applying an accounting principle to change the date of the annual goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets impairment assessment. The date was changed from September 30 to July 1, the first day of our fiscal fourth quarter. As a result, the annual goodwill impairment assessment was performed as of July 1, 2016, for fiscal year 2016. The Company believes that changing the annual goodwill impairment assessment date allows for enhanced internal controls over financial reporting by providing additional time during the fiscal fourth quarter to perform necessary analyses and reviews. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we identified indicators of impairment, including the termination of the Wal-Mart Agreement on December 1, 2014, the significant decline in market capitalization during the quarter, and continued uncertainty in projections for fiscal year 2015 and beyond. As a result, we performed step one of our goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2014. Based on step one of the goodwill impairment test as of the interim testing date, we determined that the carrying values of our two reporting units exceeded their fair values. Accordingly, step two of the goodwill impairment test was performed, where we determined the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities of the reporting units. As a result of the step two test, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $85.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. As part of our annual impairment assessment as of September 30, 2015, we identified indicators of impairment, including a decline in market capitalization and continued uncertainty in projections for fiscal year 2016 and beyond. Based on the results of step one of our goodwill impairment analysis as of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the carrying values of both of our two reporting units exceeded their fair value. Accordingly, step two of the goodwill impairment test was performed, where we determined the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the impaired reporting units. As a result of the step two test, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $51.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015. 50 As part of our annual impairment assessment as of July 1, 2016, we identified indicators of impairment. Step one of our goodwill impairment analysis as of July 1, 2016, resulted in the carrying value exceeding fair value of one of our five reporting units that had goodwill. Accordingly, step two of the goodwill impairment test was performed, where we determined the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the impaired reporting unit. As a result of step two, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $19.0 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. The goodwill impairment was due to updated assumptions used in the fair value calculation. We cannot predict the occurrence of certain future events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill, which totaled $45.1 million at September 30, 2016. Such events may include strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic environment on our base of buyers and sellers or material negative changes in our relationships with material customers. Income taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for the years in which the taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax asset. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended September 30, 2016 and projected losses in the near-term future. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as our projections for future growth. On the basis of the evaluation, we believe that it is more likely than not that the benefit of some of our deferred tax assets will not be realized within the applicable carryforward periods. In recognition of this risk, we have recorded a charge of 35.8 million to our valuation allowance to recognize only the portion of our deferred tax asset that is more likely than not to be realized. We apply the authoritative guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. ASC 740 states that a benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits. We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of federal and state tax liabilities. These estimates include, among other items, effective rates for state and local income taxes, estimates related to depreciation and amortization expense allowable for tax purposes, and the tax deductibility of certain other items. Our estimates are based on the information available to us at the time we prepare the income tax provision. We generally file our annual income tax returns several months after our fiscal year-end. Income tax returns are subject to audit by federal, state and local governments, generally years after the returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws. Stock-based compensation. We recognize all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the statements of operations based on their estimated fair values. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair values of stock options and share appreciation rights. The above list is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting estimates. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP, with little need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different 51 result. See our audited financial statements and related notes, which contain accounting policies and other disclosures required by GAAP. Components of Revenue and Expenses Revenue. We generate substantially all of our revenue from sales of merchandise, either by acting as the principal and recording the total sale price as revenue, or by acting as an agent to a seller and recording our consignment fees as revenue. Our revenue recognition practices are discussed in more detail in the section above entitled ‘‘Critical Accounting Estimates.’’ Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold includes the costs of purchasing and transporting property for auction, as well as credit card transaction fees. Profit-sharing distributions. Our prior Scrap Contract with the DoD that expired September 30, 2016, was structured as a profit-sharing arrangement in which we purchase and take possession of all goods we receive from the DoD at a contractual price per pound. After deducting allowable operating expenses, we disburse to the DoD on a monthly basis a percentage of the profits of the aggregate monthly sales. We retain the remaining percentage of these profits after the DoD’s disbursement. We refer to these disbursement payments to the DoD as profit-sharing distributions. Our new Scrap Contract that commences in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 is structured as a revenue-sharing arrangement, and so we will no longer be reporting distributions on this contract based on a share of profit, but instead on a share of revenue. Technology and operations. Technology expenses consist primarily of personnel costs related to our programming staff who develop and deploy new marketplaces and continuously enhance existing marketplaces. These personnel also develop and upgrade the software systems that support our operations, such as sales processing. Our marketplaces and support systems require frequent upgrades and enhancements to maintain viability. Software development costs are capitalized if they meet the criteria under ASC 350. Operations expenses consist primarily of operating costs, including buyer relations, shipping logistics and distribution center operating costs. Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses include the cost of our sales and marketing personnel as well as the cost of marketing and promotional activities. These activities include online marketing campaigns such as paid search advertising. General and administrative. General and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions that support our operations and provide an infrastructure to facilitate our future growth. Components of these expenses include executive management and staff salaries, bonuses and related taxes and employee benefits; travel; headquarters rent and related occupancy costs; and legal and accounting fees. The salaries, bonus and employee benefits costs included as general and administrative expenses are generally more fixed in nature than our operating expenses and do not vary directly with the volume of merchandise sold through our marketplaces. Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses consist primarily of the depreciation and amortization of amounts recorded in connection with the purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment and amortization of intangible assets from our acquisitions. Depreciation and amortization also consists of the amortization of our contract intangibles associated with the Jacobs Trading acquisition on October 1, 2011, and the NESA transaction on November 1, 2012. The intangible asset created in conjunction with the acquisition of Jacobs Trading Company was valued at $33.3 million and was being amortized over 55 months on a straight-line basis. The amortization period was correlated to the base term of the Wal-Mart contract from the acquisition date, exclusive of renewal periods. Upon the early termination of the Wal-Mart contract in December 2014, we expensed the remaining amount of unamortized expense of approximately $10.3 million during the three months 52 ended December 2014. The vendor contract intangible asset created in conjunction with the NESA acquisition was written off in fiscal year 2015. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets consist of expenses incurred to complete a business combination, adjustments to the fair value of earn-outs, and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Interest (income) expense and other expense, net. consists of interest income on the note receivable related to the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company, expenses related to our terminated credit facility, and impacts of foreign currency fluctuations. Interest (income) expense and other expense, net Income taxes. During fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016, we had an effective income tax rate for continuing operations of approximately 39.3%, 27.4% and (82.1%), respectively, which included federal, state and foreign income taxes. Results of Operations The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of revenue. Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization) . . . . . . . . . Profit-sharing distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Technology and operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments 45.2 3.5 29.5 11.9 12.6 2.1 and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets . . . 6.0 Business disposition loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110.8 (Loss) income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10.8) 0.4 Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.8 7.1 25.1 10.5 10.4 2.3 37.1 2.0 136.3 (36.3) (0.1) (Loss) income from operations before provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10.4) 8.5 Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (36.4) (10.0) 42.7 7.1 22.0 8.4 10.0 3.3 (3.7) — 89.8 10.2 (0.1) 10.1 4.0 Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (18.9)% (26.4)% 6.1% 53 Year Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2015 Revenue. Revenue decreased $80.7 million, or 20.3%, to $316.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $397.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, due to (1) a 24.9% decrease, or $54.2 million, in our commercial marketplaces due to the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company in September 2015, the wind down of the NESA refurbishment business in Canada, reduced product flows within our retail vertical and, slightly offset by stronger capital assets deal flow; and (2) an 18.0% decrease, or $28.7 million, in our DoD contracts due to lower commodity prices and a shift in property mix to lower valued property provided under the Scrap and Surplus Contracts, partly offset by higher service revenue. These decreases were partially offset by a 10.8% increase, or $2.2 million, in our state and local government marketplace due to an increase in the number of new sellers and additional sales volume from existing clients. The amount of GMV decreased 19.6%, or $156.9 million to $642.1 million, for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $799.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, due to (1) a 31.6% GMV decrease, or $139.4 million, in our commercial marketplaces due to the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company, the wind down of the NESA business, reduced product flows within our retail vertical, and continued weakness in the energy sector; and (2) a 28.4% GMV decrease, or $45.2 million, in our DoD contracts due to lower commodity prices and a shift in property mix to lower valued property provided under the Scrap and Surplus Contracts. These GMV decreases were partially offset by a 13.9% GMV increase, or $27.7 million, in our state and local government (GovDeals) marketplace due to an increase in the number of new sellers and additional sales volume from existing clients. Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization) decreased $22.9 million, or 13.8%, to $143.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $166.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. This decrease is primarily attributed to the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company, as well as the wind down of the NESA refurbishment business in Canada. This decrease was partially offset by the increase in the price we pay for inventory under the current Surplus Contract as well as a greater mix of deals in our commercial marketplaces in which we act as principal and incur greater transaction costs. In line with these changes, and the decrease in revenue, cost of goods sold increased as a percentage of revenue to 45.2%, from 41.8%. Profit-sharing distributions. Profit-sharing distributions decreased $16.9 million, or 60.1%, to $11.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $28.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. As a percentage of revenue, profit-sharing distributions decreased to 3.5% from 7.1%. This is due to lower commodity prices and decreases in property flow from the DoD in our scrap business. Technology and operations expenses. Technology and operations expenses decreased $6.3 million, or 6.4%, to $93.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $99.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, due to the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company, the wind down of the NESA business, and reduction in staff. As a percentage of revenue, technology and operations expenses increased to 29.5% from 25.1% primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue described above. Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 9.4%, to $37.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $41.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to bad debt expense related to the Jacobs Trading Company in fiscal 2015, as well as staff reductions. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses increased to 11.9% from 10.4% primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue described above. General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased $1.7 million, or 4.1%, to $39.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $41.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 due to the wind down of the NESA refurbishment business in Canada and the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company in fiscal 2015. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative 54 expenses increased to 12.6% from 10.4% primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue described above. Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $2.7 million, or 29.6%, to $6.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $9.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, as a result of merging the line item Amortization of Contract Intangibles, which had been disclosed in previous financial statements, to the depreciation and amortization expenses line item. The balance in Amortization of Contract Intangibles related to specific contract intangibles, and in the prior year totaled $1.2 million. The decrease also relates to certain capitalized software becoming full amortized, and the sale of the Jacobs Trading Company in September 2015 and its related depreciable assets. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets decreased $128.4 million, or 87.1% to $19.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $147.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. During fiscal 2016 the Company recorded an impairment charge of $19.0 million of goodwill related to one of its reporting units. During fiscal 2015 the Company recorded $147.4 million of goodwill and long-lived assets impairment charges. Business disposition loss. Business disposition loss was $8.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, due to the disposal of the Jacobs Trading Company. Interest and other income (expense), net. $1.4 million, to $1.2 million of income for the year ended September 30, 2016 from an expense of ($0.2) million for the year ended September 30, 2015. Interest and other income (expense), net included the impacts of foreign currency fluctuations and interest income. Interest and other income (expense), net increased Provision (benefit) for income taxes. Provision for income taxes increased $66.6 million, or 168.2%, to $27.0 million for year ended September 30, 2016 from ($39.6) million of benefit for the year ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the valuation allowance against deferred taxes. Net loss. Net loss decreased $44.9 million, or 42.8%, to $59.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 from $104.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the larger impairment of goodwill in the twelve months ended September 30, 2015. Year Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2014 Revenue. Revenue decreased $98.5 million, or 19.9%, to $397.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $495.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily due to (1) a 27.9% decrease, or $62.5 million, in our retail commercial marketplaces, primarily as a result of the loss of the Wal-Mart Agreement; and (2) a 22.2% decrease, or $45.3 million, in our DoD contracts as the result of decreased property flows of lower value product. These decreases were offset in part by (1) a 13.4% increase, or $6.6 million, in our capital assets marketplaces due to an increase in principal deals in our manufacturing vertical; and (2) a 14.8% increase, or $2.6 million, in our state and local government (GovDeals) marketplace due to an increase in the number of sellers. The amount of gross merchandise volume decreased $132.6 million, or 14.2%, to $799.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $931.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to (1) a 31.8% decrease, or $102.7 million, in our commercial retail marketplaces, primarily as a result of the loss of the Wal-Mart Agreement; (2) the decreases in our DoD contracts discussed above; and (3) a 17.7% decrease, or $11.9 million, in our capital assets marketplaces due to the continued weakness in the energy and transportation verticals. These decreases were partially offset by a 15.9% increase, or $27.3 million, in our state and local government (GovDeals) marketplace due to an increase in the number of sellers. 55 Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization) decreased $45.7 million, or 21.6%, to $166.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $211.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses decreased to 41.8% from 42.7%. These decreases are primarily due to (1) decreased sales of lower value product under our DoD contracts; and (2) decreases in property flow in our retail commercial marketplaces as a result of the termination of the Wal-Mart Agreement. Profit-sharing distributions. Profit-sharing distributions decreased $7.0 million, or 19.9%, to $28.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $35.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily as a result of decreased property flow under the Scrap Contract. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses were consistent at 7.1%. Technology and operations expenses. Technology and operations expenses decreased $9.2 million, or 8.4%, to $99.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $108.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to (1) a decrease in expenses of $8.3 million in staff and temporary wages, including stock based compensation, primarily as a result of our business realignment initiative; and (2) a decrease in expenses of $0.9 million in warehouse space as our inventory balance has declined resulting in lower storage costs. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses increased to 25.1% from 22.0%, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue as described above. Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $0.5 million, or 1.2%, to $41.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $42.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, which is not significant. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses increased to 10.5% from 8.4%, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue as described above. General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased $8.0 million, or 16.2%, to $41.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $49.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to (1) a decrease in expenses of $3.0 million in staff wages, including stock based and performance based compensation, primarily as a result of our business realignment initiative; and (2) a net decrease in expenses of $4.8 million in overhead and travel expenses due to streamlining our GoIndustry global operations and lowering our general and administrative expenses. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses increased to 10.4% from 10.0%, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue as described above. Depreciation and amortization expenses. Aside from amortization of contract intangibles, depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $1.3 million, or 14.0%, to $8.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $9.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to intangible assets related to the NESA acquisition being fully amortized in fiscal year 2014. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses increased to 2.0% from 1.9%, primarily as a result of the decrease in revenue as described above. Amortization of contract intangibles decreased $6.1 million, or 83.3%, to $1.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $7.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses decreased to 0.3% from 1.4%. These decreases are primarily due to the write-off of the remaining unamortized expense related to the Jacobs Trading acquisition contract intangible asset due to the early termination of the Wal-Mart contract in December 2014. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets increased $165.8 million to $147.4 million of expense for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $18.4 million of income for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily as a result of goodwill and long-lived assets impairment charges of $147.4 million during the year ended September 30, 2015, and the reversal of the earn-out liability associated with the NESA acquisition of approximately $18.6 million during the twelve months ended September 30, 2014. 56 Business disposition loss. Business disposition loss was $8.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, due to the disposal of the Jacobs Trading business. Interest and other expense, net. $0.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $0.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2014, which is not significant. Interest and other expense, net, decreased $0.2 million, or 53.8%, to Benefit (provision) for income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased $59.3 million, or 301.3%, to $39.6 million of benefit for the year ended September 30, 2015, from $19.7 million of expense for the year ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to the decrease in income before provision for income taxes from operations and deferred tax benefits resulting from the goodwill impairment charges. Net income (loss). Net income decreased $135.2 million, or 444.8%, to $104.8 million of net loss for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $30.4 million of net income for the year ended September 30, 2014. Liquidity and Capital Resources Historically, our primary cash needs have been working capital (including capital used for inventory purchases), which we have funded primarily through cash generated from operations. As of September 30, 2016, we had approximately $134.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. Effective March 25, 2016, we terminated our $75 million senior credit facility. We do not expect the termination of the Senior Credit Facility to have a material effect on our liquidity or financial position. Throughout the year, we have continued to advance the design and development of our LiquidityOne platform, services and analytical tools to empower our clients to maximize bottom-line return, and transform their supply chain into a high-performing business function. We will continue to incur additional costs throughout the duration of this initiative to implement the new platform and educate our employees and clients about the initiative. As part of this process, we have invested in new business ventures, such as our IronDirect marketplace in the construction vertical. We expect that the IronDirect marketplace may generate future synergies with our other marketplaces when IronDirect customers dispose of the construction equipment purchased from this marketplace. We did not record a provision for deferred U.S. tax expense on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries since we intend to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of these foreign subsidiaries outside the U.S. The amount of such undistributed foreign earnings was approximately $10.7 million as of September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, approximately $21.5 million and $23.6 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents was held overseas and not available to fund domestic operations without incurring taxes upon repatriation. We are authorized to repurchase issued and outstanding shares of our common stock under a share repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. Share repurchases may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. The repurchase program may be discontinued or suspended at any time, and will be funded using our available cash. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews the share repurchase program periodically, the last such review having occurred in May 2016. We did not repurchase shares under this program during the twelve months ended September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we may 57 repurchase an additional $10.1 million shares under this program. A summary of our share repurchase activity from fiscal year 2013 to the year ended September 30, 2016 is as follows: Fiscal Year Period 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Number of Shares Purchased — 2,962,978 — — Average Price Paid per Share — $15.90 — — Total Cash Paid for Shares Purchased — 44,873,000 — — Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) $31,000,000 5,127,000 5,127,000 10,127,000 (1) On February 5, 2014, our Board of Directors approved an additional $19.0 million for the share repurchase program. On May 5, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional $5.0 million in shares raising the current amount approved for repurchase, that may yet be expended up to $10.1 million. Senior credit facility. Effective March 25, 2016, the Company terminated its $75 million senior credit facility. Borrowings under the Agreement bore interest at an annual rate equal to the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.25% (1.608% at December 31, 2015) due monthly. The Company’s borrowing availability under the Facility as of December 31, 2015 was $37.5 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Facility at the time of its termination. Substantially all of our sales are recorded subsequent to receipt of payment authorization, utilizing credit cards, wire transfers and PayPal, an Internet based payment system, as methods of payments. As a result, we are not subject to significant collection risk, as goods are generally not shipped before payment is received. Changes in Cash Flows: 2016 Compared to 2015 Net cash provided by operating activities was $45.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2016, from $43.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. The $2.3 million increase in cash provided by operations between periods was primarily attributable to an overall decrease of approximately $59.3 million in net loss including non-cash adjustments offset by an increase in cash flows from changes in working capital of approximately $61.7 million. For the year ended September 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities primarily consisted of $34.0 million related to the recovery of prior year income taxes, netted with estimated taxes for fiscal year 2016. This cash benefit resulted from the tax loss on the fiscal 2015 sale of the Jacobs Trading Company. Net cash used in investing activities was $6.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 and $9.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2016 consisted primarily of expenditures of $6.1 million for capitalized software, purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2015 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $7.3 million for purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements, and $2.4 million related to net cash paid for a business disposition. Net cash used by financing activities was $0.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 and net cash provided by financing activities was $0.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2015 consisted primarily of proceeds from the exercise of common stock options. 58 Changes in Cash Flows: 2015 Compared to 2014 Net cash provided by operating activities increased $31.6 million to $43.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 from $11.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. For the year ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities primarily consisted of net loss of $104.8 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $9.2 million, stock compensation expense of $12.4 million, loss on business disposition of $8.0 million, goodwill and long-lived assets impairment of $147.4 million, net increase in accounts receivable, inventory, and prepaid expenses of $15.7 million, and provisions for inventory allowance and doubtful accounts of $0.5 million, offset in part by a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $38.7 million, and deferred tax benefit and incremental tax from exercises of common stock options of $6.2 million, net. For the year ended September 30, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities primarily consisted of net income of $30.4 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $16.6 million, stock compensation expense of $12.6 million and a net increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $20.6 million, offset in part by the NESA earn-out liability reversal of $18.4 million, a net increase in accounts receivable, inventory and prepaid expense of $47.4 million, and provisions for inventory allowance, doubtful accounts, deferred tax benefit, and incremental tax from exercises of common stock options of $2.6 million, net. Net cash used in investing activities was $9.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, and $7.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. For the year ended September 2015, net cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of net cash paid for business disposition of $2.4 million, an increase of goodwill and intangibles of $0.1 million, and capital expenditures of $7.3 million for purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements. For the year ended September 30, 2014, net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2014 consisted primarily of net cash paid for acquisitions and an increase of goodwill and intangibles of $0.2 million, and capital expenditures of $7.5 million for purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements. Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2015. Net cash used in financing activities as $36.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2014. For the year ended September 30, 2015, cash provided by financing activities consisted primarily of $0.1 million from exercises of common stock options and the tax benefit, net. For the year ended September 30, 2014, cash used in financing activities consisted primarily of $44.9 million in stock repurchases, offset in part by proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and the incremental tax benefit from the exercise of common stock options of $8.0 million. Capital Expenditures. Our capital expenditures consist primarily of capitalized software, computers and purchased software, office equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements. The timing and volume of such capital expenditures in the future will be affected by the addition of new customers or expansion of existing customer relationships. We intend to fund those expenditures primarily from operating cash flows. Our capital expenditures for the twelve months ended September 30, 2016 were $6.1 million. As of September 30, 2016, we had no outstanding commitments for capital expenditures. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the development and deployment of new marketplaces, the introduction of new value added services and the costs to establish additional distribution centers. Although we are currently not a party to any definitive agreement with respect to potential investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, products or technologies, we may enter into these types of arrangements in the future, which could also require us to seek additional equity or debt financing. The sale of additional equity securities or convertible debt securities would result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Additional debt would result in increased interest 59 expense and could result in covenants that would restrict our operations. There is no assurance that such financing, if required, will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Contractual and Commercial Commitments The table below represents our significant commercial commitments as of September 30, 2016. Operating leases represent commitments to rent office and warehouse space in the United States. These items are not reflected on our balance sheets. Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other contractual cash obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29,780 3,027 (in thousands) $15,252 723 $ 9,406 1,999 $5,073 305 Total contractual cash obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,807 $11,405 $15,975 $5,378 $49 0 $49 Total Less than 1 year 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 Years 5+ years Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered material off-balance sheet arrangements. Inflation Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor and equipment. We do not believe that inflation had any material effect on our results of operations during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016. New Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide disclosures in certain circumstances. The new guidance was issued to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects to adopt this standard in its fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect upon its consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The new standard will change the way the Company recognizes revenue and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements. In July 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of the new standard such that the new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on October 1, 2018, and may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new and existing arrangements with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date, with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to retained earnings at the effective date for existing arrangements with remaining performance obligations. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect that adoption of the standard is expected to have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2015-05, ‘‘Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. ASU 2015-05 provides guidance regarding whether a 60 cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the software license element of the arrangement must be accounted for in a manner consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement must be accounted for as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 does not change the accounting for service contracts. ASU 2015-05 is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company will apply the amendments in this Update beginning in fiscal 2017. In November, 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2015-17, ‘‘Income Taxes—Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.’’ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this update. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. The amendments in the Update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company has early adopted and chosen to apply the amendments in this Update prospectively effective fiscal year 2016. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 will change the way the Company recognizes its leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets—referred to as ‘‘lessees’’—to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities representing the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning on October 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect that adoption of the standard is expected to have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. Interest rate sensitivity. We did not have any debt as of September 30, 2016 and thus do not have any related interest rate exposure. Our investment policy requires us to invest funds in excess of current operating requirements. The principal objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income consistent with minimizing risk of material loss. Exchange rate sensitivity. We consider our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal, as approximately 11.1% percent of our revenue was generated outside of the U.S. We have not engaged in any hedging or other derivative transactions to date. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data. Annual Financial Statements and Selected Financial Data: The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes listed in Part IV, Item 15(a)(1) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. 61 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This ‘‘Controls and Procedures’’ section includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in the certifications. The report of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, and its audit of our internal control over financial reporting is set forth below in this section. This section should be read in conjunction with the certifications and the Ernst & Young LLP report for a more complete understanding of the topics presented. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our ‘‘disclosure controls and procedures’’ as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. Disclosure controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of disclosure controls includes an evaluation of some components of our internal control over financial reporting, and internal control over financial reporting is also separately evaluated on an annual basis for purposes of providing the management report which is set forth below. The evaluation of our disclosure controls included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, our implementation of the controls and their effect on the information generated for use in this Form 10-K. In the course of the controls evaluation, we reviewed identified data errors, control deficiencies and, where appropriate, sought to confirm that appropriate corrective actions, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, concerning the effectiveness of the disclosure controls can be reported in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K. Many of the components of our disclosure controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by our finance organization. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls, and to modify them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain the disclosure controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant. Based upon the controls evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, our disclosure controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material information related to Liquidity Services and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared. We reviewed the results of management’s evaluation with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. 62 Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding authorization to effect the acquisition, use or disposition of company assets, as well as the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Management’s assessment included evaluation of such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies and our overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed by our finance organization. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, independently assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP has issued an attestation report, which is included at the end of this section. Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Other inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting On a quarterly basis we evaluate any changes to our internal control over financial reporting to determine if material changes occurred. There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 63 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016 of Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated November 21, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP McLean, Virginia November 21, 2016 Item 9B. Other Information. None. 64 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2016. Code of Ethics, Governance Guidelines and Committee Charters We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all Liquidity Services employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website. Item 11. Executive Compensation. Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2016. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters. Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2016. Item 13. Certain Relationship and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2016. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 2016. 65 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. PART IV (a)(1) The following financial statements are filed as part of this report: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 (a)(2) The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this report: Schedules for the three years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016: II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted. (a)(3) The documents required to be filed as exhibits to this report under Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index included elsewhere in this report, which list is incorporated herein by reference. 66 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Liquidity Services, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated November 21, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP McLean, Virginia November 21, 2016 67 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in Thousands) September 30, 2016 2015 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $718 and $471 in 2016 and 2015, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax refund receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid and deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred long-term tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $134,513 $ 95,465 10,355 27,610 1,205 2,166 9,063 184,912 14,376 2,650 45,134 1,021 12,016 6,194 25,510 33,491 19,903 7,826 188,389 13,356 4,051 64,073 5,871 12,748 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $260,109 $288,488 Liabilities and stockholders’ equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Profit-sharing distributions payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,732 45,133 1,722 28,901 $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred taxes and other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and contingencies (Note 9 and 19) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ equity: Common stock, $0.001 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 30,742,662 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016; 30,026,223 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162,611 216,002 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $260,109 $288,488 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 68 9,500 27,350 2,512 29,802 69,164 3,322 72,486 — 85,488 12,010 97,498 — 29 220,192 (8,571) (49,039) 29 210,712 (5,626) 10,887 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations (Dollars in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data) Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total revenue from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 $ 233,828 82,626 316,454 $ 315,668 81,457 397,125 388,671 106,990 495,661 Costs and expenses from operations: Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization) . . . . . . . . . . . Profit-sharing distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Technology and operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales and marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . Business disposition loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143,127 11,214 93,405 37,570 39,717 6,502 19,037 — Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350,572 166,009 28,093 99,743 41,465 41,418 9,235 147,414 7,963 541,340 (Loss) income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Loss) income before provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (34,118) 1,217 (32,901) 27,025 (144,215) (171) (144,386) (39,571) Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic (loss) earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted (loss) earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ (59,926) $ (104,815) $ (1.96) $ (3.50) $ (1.96) $ (3.50) $ 211,659 35,055 108,940 41,951 49,428 16,595 (18,384) — 445,244 50,417 (370) 50,047 19,657 30,390 0.97 0.97 Basic weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,638,163 29,987,985 31,243,932 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,638,163 29,987,985 31,395,301 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 69 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (In Thousands) Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive (loss) income: Defined benefit pension plan—unrecognized amounts, net of taxes . Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive (loss), net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 $(59,926) $(104,815) $30,390 (2,547) (398) (2,945) 1,101 (3,276) (927) (3,042) (2,175) (3,969) Comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(62,871) $(106,990) $26,421 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 70 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (In Thousands Except Share Data) Treasury Stock Common Stock Shares Amount Shares Amount Balance at September 30, 2013 — Common stock repurchase . . (2,962,978) (44,870) Common stock retired . . . . 44,870 Exercise of common stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,962,978 — — $31 — 31,811,764 (3) — (2,962,978) — 819,364 — 4,146 Additional Paid-in Capital $206,861 — (22,713) Accumulated Other Retained Earnings Comprehensive (Accumulated Income (Loss) Loss) Total $ 518 — $ 107,469 — (22,157) $ 314,879 (44,873) — Compensation expense and incremental tax benefit from grant of common stock options and issuance of restricted stock . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . Defined benefit pension plan—unrecognized amounts, net of taxes . . . . Foreign currency translation . Balance at September 30, 2014 Exercise of common stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation expense and incremental tax benefit from grant of common stock options and issuance of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss Defined benefit pension plan—unrecognized amounts, net of taxes . . . . Foreign currency translation . Balance at September 30, 2015 Exercise of common stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation expense and incremental tax benefit from grant of common stock options and issuance of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss Defined benefit pension plan—unrecognized amounts, net of taxes . . . . Foreign currency translation . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,146 — 30,390 16,410 30,390 — 358,073 1 105 16,410 — 5,903 — — — — — — — — 29,668,150 — — — $28 — — — — — — — 30,026,223 — — — $29 — 716,439 — 9 — — 9,471 — — — — — — — $29 — (927) (3,042) — (927) (3,042) $204,704 $(3,451) $ 115,702 $ 316,983 — — — — 106 — (104,815) 5,903 (104,815) — 1,101 (3,276) — 1,101 (3,276) $210,712 $(5,626) $ 10,887 $ 216,002 — — — — 9 — (59,926) 9,471 (59,926) Balance at September 30, 2016 — $ — 30,742,662 — — — (2,547) (398) — (2,547) (398) $220,192 $(8,571) $ (49,039) $ 162,611 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 71 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In Thousands) Operating activities Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business disposition loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in fair value of earn out liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for inventory allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Incremental tax loss (benefit) from exercise of common stock 2016 2015 2014 $ (59,926) $(104,815) $ 30,390 6,502 — — 12,247 2,676 247 26,177 18,998 9,235 7,963 16,595 — — (18,390) 12,605 271 151 828 — 12,405 (575) 1,109 (6,282) 147,414 options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 38 (3,805) Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid and deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Profit-sharing distributions payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investing activities Cash paid in divestiture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash paid for acquisitions and increase in intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized software . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing activities Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of common stock options (net of tax) . . . . . . . Incremental tax benefit from exercise of common stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . (4,408) (4,776) 27,057 (160) 232 17,151 (790) (901) 5,283 45,838 — (62) (6,090) (6,152) — 9 (229) (220) (418) 12,651 43,101 (38,545) (1,499) (4,534) (18,895) (2,228) (11,742) (1,310) 2,211 (49,488) (2,829) 2,735 (545) 9,659 425 12,046 (1,003) 43,491 11,856 (2,372) (137) (7,312) (9,821) — (141) (7,539) (7,680) — (44,873) 4,146 106 (38) 68 (871) 3,805 (36,922) 235 (32,511) 95,109 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,048 95,465 32,867 62,598 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $134,513 $ 95,465 $ 62,598 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information Cash received (paid) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 33,966 $ (5,678) $(18,108) See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 72 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Organization Liquidity Services (the ‘‘Company’’) employs innovative e-commerce marketplace solutions to manage, value, and sell inventory and equipment for business and government clients. The Company operates a network of leading e-commerce marketplaces that enable buyers and sellers to transact in an efficient, automated environment offering over 500 product categories. The Company’s marketplaces provide professional buyers access to a global, organized supply of new, surplus, and scrap assets presented with digital images and other relevant product information. Additionally, the Company enables its corporate and government sellers to enhance their financial return on offered assets by providing a liquid marketplace and value-added services that encompass the consultative management, valuation, and sale of surplus assets. The Company’s broad range of services include program management, valuation, asset management, reconciliation, RTV and RMA (‘‘Return to Vendor’’ and ‘‘Returns Management Authorization’’), refurbishment and recycling, fulfillment, marketing and sales, warehousing and transportation, buyer customer support, and compliance and risk mitigation. The Company organizes the products on its marketplaces into categories across major industry verticals such as consumer electronics, general merchandise, apparel, scientific equipment, aerospace parts and equipment, technology hardware, energy equipment, industrial capital assets, fleet and transportation equipment and specialty equipment. The Company’s marketplaces are www.liquidation.com, www.govliquidation.com, www.govdeals.com, www.networkintl.com, www.truckcenter.com, www.secondipity.com, www.unclesamsretailoutlet.com, www.go-dove.com, and www.irondirect.com. We have over 8,000 clients, including Fortune 1000 and Global 500 organizations as well as government agencies. The Company has one reportable segment consisting of an aggregation of five operating segments that manage e-commerce marketplaces for sellers and buyers of new, surplus, and scrap assets. The Company’s operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties associated with technology-oriented companies including, but not limited to, the Company’s dependence on use of the Internet, the effect of general business and economic trends, its susceptibility to rapid technological change, actual and potential competition by entities with greater financial resources, and the potential for the U.S. Government agencies from which the Company has derived a significant portion of its inventory to change the way they conduct their surplus disposition or to otherwise not renew their contracts with the Company. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date that these financial statements were issued and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. 73 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented have been included. Business Combinations The Company recognizes all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred. Restructuring costs incurred in periods subsequent to the acquisition date are expensed when incurred. Subsequent changes to the purchase price (i.e., working capital adjustments) or other fair value adjustments determined during the measurement period are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill, with the exception of contingent consideration, which is recognized in the statement of operations in the period it is modified. All subsequent changes to a valuation allowance or uncertain tax position that relate to the acquired company and existed at the acquisition date that occur both within the measurement period and as a result of facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date are recognized as an adjustment to goodwill. All other changes in valuation allowances are recognized as a reduction or increase to income tax expense or as a direct adjustment to additional paid-in capital as required. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid securities purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and are non-interest bearing. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially uncollectible receivables. Allowances are based on management’s judgment, which considers historical experience and specific knowledge of accounts where collectability may not be probable. The Company makes provisions based on historical bad debt experience, a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices and an assessment of general economic conditions. Inventory Inventory consists of property obtained for resale, generally through the online auction process, and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the specific identification method. Charges for unsellable inventory, as well as for inventory written down to expected market price, are included in cost of goods sold in the period in which they have been determined to occur. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s inventory reserve was approximately $3.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. 74 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Property and Equipment Property and equipment is recorded at cost, and depreciated and amortized on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: Computers and purchased software Office equipment Furniture and fixtures Leasehold improvements Buildings Land One to five years Three to five years Five to seven years Shorter of lease term or useful life Thirty-nine years Not depreciated Intangible Assets Intangible assets primarily consist of contract acquisition costs, covenants not to compete, customer relationships and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, ranging from three to ten years. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets, including definite lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, the Company evaluates recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the assets are impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Goodwill Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate impairment may exist. Examples of such events or circumstances could include a significant change in business climate or the loss of a significant customer. In evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more than likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, no further testing of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit is required. However, if the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the Company applies a two-step fair value-based test to assess goodwill for impairment. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is then performed. The second step compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recorded in the statement of operations. During fiscal year 2016, the Company made a voluntary change in the method of applying an accounting principle to change the date of the annual goodwill impairment assessment. The date was changed from September 30 to July 1. As a result, the annual goodwill impairment assessment was performed as of July 1, 2016 for fiscal year 2016. 75 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (cid:129) a buyer submits the winning bid in an auction and, as a result, evidence of an arrangement exists and the sale price has been determined; (cid:129) the buyer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership; and (cid:129) collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is also evaluated to determine whether to report the gross proceeds as revenue (when we act as the principal in the arrangement) or report our net commissions and related fees as revenue (when we act as an agent). In arrangements in which the Company is deemed to be the primary obligor, bears physical and general inventory risk, and credit risk, the Company recognizes as revenue the gross proceeds from the sale, including buyer’s premiums. The Company has evaluated its revenue recognition policy related to sales under its profit-sharing model and determined it is appropriate to account for these sales on a gross basis. In the Company’s evaluation, the Company relied most heavily upon its status as primary obligor in the sales relationship and the fact that the Company has general inventory risk. In arrangements in which the Company acts as an agent or broker on a consignment basis, without taking physical or general inventory risk, revenue is recognized based on the sales commissions that are paid to the Company by the sellers for utilizing the Company’s services; in this situation, sales commissions represent a percentage of the gross proceeds from the sale that the seller pays to the Company upon completion of the transaction. Such revenue as well as other fee revenue is presented as Fee Revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company collects and remits sales taxes on merchandise that it purchases and sells, and reports such amounts under the net method in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold includes the costs of purchasing and transporting property for auction as well as credit card transaction fees. The Company purchases the majority of its inventory at a percentage of the supplier’s original acquisition cost under the Surplus Contract and certain commercial contracts, at a percentage of the supplier’s last retail price under certain commercial contracts, and at a fixed price per pound that varies depending on the type of the inventory purchased under the Scrap Contract. Title for the inventory passes to the Company at the time of purchase and the Company bears the risks and rewards of ownership. The Company does not have title to assets sold on behalf of its commercial or government customers when it receives only sales commission revenue and, as such, recognizes no cost of goods sold associated with those sales. Cost of goods sold also includes shipping and handling costs. Risk Associated with Certain Concentrations The Company does not perform credit evaluations for the majority of its buyers. However, substantially all sales are recorded subsequent to payment authorization being received. As a result, the Company is not subject to significant collection risk, as most goods are not shipped before payment is received. 76 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) For consignment sales transactions, funds are collected from buyers and are held by the Company on the sellers’ behalf. The funds are included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated financial statements. The Company releases the funds to the seller, less the Company’s commission and other fees due, after the buyer has accepted the goods or within 30 days, depending on the state where the buyer and seller conduct business. The amount of cash held on behalf of the sellers is recorded as customer payables in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents in banks over FDIC limits, and accounts receivable. The Company deposits its cash with financial institutions that the Company considers to be of high credit quality. The Company has two material contracts with the DoD under which it acquires, manages and sells government property. Revenue from the current Surplus Contract accounted for 26.8%, 24.7%, and 31.0% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Revenue from the Scrap contract accounted for approximately 14.4%, 15.3% and 10.2% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, the Company has a contract with a commercial client under which it acquires and sells commercial merchandise. Revenue generated from the arrangement represented approximately 9.7% of revenue during fiscal year 2016. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for the years in which the taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax asset. The resulting net tax asset reflects management’s estimate of the amount that will be realized. The Company applies the authoritative guidance related to uncertainty in income taxes. ASC 740 states that a benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits. We record unrecognized tax benefits as a reduction to our deferred tax asset for our net operating loss carryforward. We have reduced our net operating loss carryforward by $0.7 million for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal and state exposures. Stock-Based Compensation The Company estimates the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The determination of the fair value of the Company’s stock option awards and stock appreciation rights is based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, the 77 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Company’s common stock price, expected stock price volatility over the expected life of awards, and actual and projected exercise behavior. Additionally, the Company has estimated forfeitures for share- based awards at the dates of grant based on historical experience, adjusted for future expectation. The forfeiture estimate is revised as necessary if actual forfeitures differ from these estimates. The Company issues stock options, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights where restrictions lapse upon either the passage of time (service vesting), achievement of performance targets, or some combination thereof. For those awards with only service vesting conditions, the Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the explicit service period. For awards with both performance and service conditions, the Company starts recognizing compensation cost over the remaining service period, when it is probable the performance condition will be met. For stock options and stock awards that contain performance vesting conditions, the Company excludes these awards from diluted earnings per share computations until the contingency is met as of the end of that reporting period. The Company presents the cash flows from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) as a financing activity with a corresponding operating cash outflow in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Advertising Costs Advertising expenditures are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs charged to expense were $7.2 million, $5.3 million, and $6.0 million for the years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, profit-sharing distributions payable, and customer payables reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate their fair values. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is primarily the local currency. The translation of the subsidiary’s financial statements into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses for 2014, 2015 and 2016 are included in interest and other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. 78 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) (Net of taxes, amount in dollars) The following table shows the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes (in thousands): Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Net Change Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Balance at 09/30/13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at 09/30/14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at 09/30/15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at 09/30/16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (629) (3,042) (3,671) (3,276) (6,947) (398) (7,345) 1,147 (927) 220 1,101 1,321 (2,547) (1,226) 518 (3,969) (3,451) (2,175) (5,626) (2,945) (8,571) Earnings per Share The Company calculates net income (loss) per share in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) Topic 260 Earnings Per Share (‘‘ASC 260’’). Under ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding includes vested restricted stock awards. Diluted net income (loss) per share (‘‘EPS’’) reflects the potential dilution that could occur assuming conversion or exercise of all dilutive unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. The dilutive effect of unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards was determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service not yet recognized by the Company and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when stock options become deductible for income tax purposes are all assumed to be used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock options and restricted stock awards are not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share when they are antidilutive. The Company has not included the following stock options in the calculation of diluted income per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market prices for the applicable periods: (a) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 - 1,284,689 options; (b) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 - 1,256,345 options; and (c) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 - 836,303 options. 79 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) For the twelve months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the basic and diluted weighted average common shares were the same because the inclusion of dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive. Diluted net income attributable to common stockholders per share includes the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. See Note 12 for outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock, all of which are anti-dilutive as of September 30, 2016. The following summarizes the potential outstanding common stock of the Company as of the dates set forth below: September 30, 2016 2015 2014 (amounts in thousands except per share and share data) Weighted average shares calculation: Basic weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock effect of options and restricted stock . . . . . . . 30,638,163 — 29,987,985 — 31,243,932 151,369 Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . 30,638,163 29,987,985 31,395,301 Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic (loss) earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted (loss) earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ (59,926) $ (104,815) $ 30,390 (1.96) $ (3.50) $ (1.96) $ (3.50) $ 0.97 0.97 Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide disclosures in certain circumstances. The new guidance was issued to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects to adopt this standard in its fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect upon its consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The new standard will change the way the Company recognizes revenue and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements. In July 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of the new standard such that the new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on October 1, 2018, and may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new and existing arrangements with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date, with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to retained earnings at the effective date for existing arrangements with remaining performance obligations. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect that adoption of the standard is expected to have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 80 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2015-05, ‘‘Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. ASU 2015-05 provides guidance regarding whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the software license element of the arrangement must be accounted for in a manner consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement must be accounted for as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 does not change the accounting for service contracts. ASU 2015-05 is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company will apply the amendments in this Update beginning in fiscal year 2017. In November, 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2015-17, ‘‘Income Taxes—Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.’’ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this update. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. The amendments in the Update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company has early adopted and chosen to apply the amendments in this Update prospectively effective to the fiscal year 2016. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (‘‘ASU’’) 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 will change the way the Company recognizes its leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets—referred to as ‘‘lessees’’—to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities representing the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning on October 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect that adoption of the standard is expected to have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 3. Significant Contracts DLA Disposition Services The Company has a Surplus Contract with the DLA Disposition Services (DLA) under which the Company is the remarketer of all Department of Defense (DoD) non-rolling stock surplus turned into the DLA available for sale within the United States, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The Surplus Contract requires the Company to purchase all usable surplus property offered to the Company by the DoD at a fixed percentage of the DoD’s original acquisition value (OAV). This fixed percentage is 4.35%; prior to the date the current Surplus Contract became effective, this fixed percentage was 1.8%. The Company retains 100% of the profits from the resale of the property and bears all of the costs for the merchandising and sale of the property. Included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is a liability to the DoD of $16.1 million and $2.0 million for inventory as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Surplus Contract permits either party to 81 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 3. Significant Contracts (Continued) terminate the contract for convenience. The initial two-year base period ends in December 2016. There are four one-year options to extend, exercisable by DLA. Revenue from the current Surplus Contract accounted for 26.8%, 24.7%, and 31.0% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. The Company has a Scrap Contract with the DLA under which the Company is the remarketer of all DoD non electronic scrap turned into the DLA available for sale within the United States, Puerto Rico, and Guam. The DLA initiated an Invitation to Bid for the next Scrap Contract. Bids were solicited in February 2016, and the contract was awarded to the Company in April 2016. The contract is a three- year contract with two one-year options. The Company will pay a revenue-sharing payment to the DLA under this contract equal to 64.5% of the gross resale proceeds of the scrap property, and the Company will bear all of the costs for the sorting, merchandising and sale of the property. The contract contains a provision permitting the DLA to terminate the contract for convenience upon written notice to the Company from the DLA. The Company has commenced operations under this contract in the first fiscal quarter of 2017. Revenue from the Scrap contract accounted for approximately 14.4%, 15.3% and 10.2% of the Company’s total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. 4. National Electronic Service Association (NESA)Acquisition On November 1, 2012, the Company acquired the assets and assumed liabilities of NESA in an all- cash transaction. The acquisition price included an upfront cash payment of approximately $18.3 million and an earn-out payment. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of the earn-out as of the date of acquisition was $18.0 million. Based upon revised projections, the Company determined that the fair value of the earn-out as of June 30, 2014 was zero and reversed the liability of $18.6 million with a corresponding reduction (credit) in the acquisition costs and related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2014. NESA ceased operations in fiscal 2015. The Company has no further contractual obligations regarding the earn-out payment. 82 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 5. Property and Equipment Property and equipment, including equipment under capital lease obligations, consists of the following: September 30, 2016 2015 (in thousands) Computers and purchased software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office/Operational equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 24,584 6,700 1,356 981 5,139 2,257 754 3,926 $ 24,140 6,922 1,260 1,015 5,301 1,849 754 425 Total property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . 45,697 (31,321) 41,666 (28,310) Total property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,376 $ 13,356 Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016 was $5.6 million, $6.1 million, and $5.1 million, respectively. 6. Goodwill During fiscal year 2016, the Company made a voluntary change in the method of applying an accounting principle to change the date of the annual goodwill impairment assessment. The date was changed from September 30 to July 1. As a result, the annual goodwill impairment assessment was performed as of July 1, 2016 for fiscal year 2016. The goodwill of acquired companies is primarily related to the acquisition of an experienced and knowledgeable workforce. A reporting unit represents a component of an operating segment that (a) constitutes a business, (b) has discrete financial information, and (c) its performance is reviewed by management. At fiscal year-end 2015, the Company had two reporting units—LSI-Retail Supply Chain Group (RSCG) and LSI-Capital Assets Group (CAG). During fiscal year 2016, in light of new business ventures and management restructuring, the Company concluded it now has five reporting units—RSCG, CAG, LSI-GovDeals, LSI-Truckcenter, and LSI-IronDirect. As part of the Company’s fiscal year 2016 annual impairment assessment, the Company identified indicators of impairment and as a result performed step one of the goodwill impairment test. The Company performed the step one test using a discounted cash flow method. The Company concluded that the carrying value exceeded fair value for one of the Company’s five reporting units that had goodwill. Accordingly, the Company performed the step two test to derive the fair value of the goodwill, and as a result the Company recorded a $19.0 million impairment charge during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. The goodwill impairment was due to updated assumptions used in the fair value calculation. 83 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 6. Goodwill (Continued) As of December 31, 2014, the Company identified indicators of impairment and as a result performed an impairment test and concluded as part of the step one test that the carrying values of both of the Company’s two reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values. The Company performed the step one test using the discounted cash flow method. As a result of the step two test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $85.1 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. As of September 30, 2015, as part of the Company’s annual impairment test, the Company identified indicators of impairment and as a result performed an impairment test and concluded as part of the step one test that the carrying values of both of the Company’s two reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values. As a result of the step two test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $51.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015. Goodwill impairment losses for fiscal 2015 totaled $136.2 million and were the result of the termination of the Wal-Mart Agreement, cessation of operations of NESA, and decline in market capitalization. The following summarizes the goodwill activity for the periods indicated: Balance at September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business disposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill (in thousands) $ 209,656 (136,248) (6,733) (2,602) 64,073 (18,998) 59 Balance at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45,134 No goodwill impairments were recorded prior to September 30, 2014. 7. Intangible Assets As a result of the acquisition of Jacobs Trading Company on October 1, 2011, the Company assumed the rights and obligations of Jacobs Trading Company under the seller’s Master Merchandise Salvage Contract with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (the ‘‘Wal-Mart Agreement’’) dated May 13, 2011. On December 1, 2014, Wal-Mart provided the Company with written notice terminating the Wal-Mart Agreement effective December 8, 2014. As a result of the termination of the Wal-Mart Agreement, the Company concluded that the intangible asset related to the Wal-Mart Agreement was impaired and reduced the remaining unamortized contract intangible asset of $10.3 million to zero during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. This impairment charge is recorded in the Acquisition costs and the related fair value adjustments and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets line item in the 84 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 7. Intangible Assets (Continued) Consolidated Statements of Operations. Intangible assets at September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 consisted only of definite-lived intangible assets, and were the following: September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015 Gross Net Gross Net Carrying Accumulated Carrying Carrying Accumulated Carrying (in years) Amount Amortization Amount Amount Amortization Amount Useful Life Contract intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brand and technology . . . . . . . . . . . Covenants not to compete . . . . . . . . Patent and trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3 - 5 3 - 5 3 - 10 $1,500 5,749 700 820 (dollars in thousands) $ (150) (5,018) (533) (418) $1,350 $1,500 5,749 700 792 731 167 402 $ — $1,500 1,823 (3,926) 267 (433) 461 (331) Total intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . $8,769 $(6,119) $2,650 $8,741 $(4,690) $4,051 Future expected amortization of intangible assets at September 30, 2016 is as follows: Years ending September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 and after . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization (in thousands) $1,073 281 207 957 132 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,650 Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.4 million, $3.1 million, and $11.0 million, respectively. In prior years the Company presented amortization of contract intangibles on a separate line item within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During fiscal year 2016, the Company reclassified amortization of contract intangibles to the depreciation and amortization line item. 8. Debt Senior Credit Facility In 2010, the Company entered into a senior credit facility (the Agreement) with a bank, which provided for borrowings up to $75.0 million, as amended. On May 1, 2015, the Company amended this credit facility extending the term to May 31, 2018. Borrowings under the Agreement bore interest at an annual rate equal to the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.25% (1.451% at September 30, 2015) due monthly. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Agreement, and the Company’s borrowing availability was $37.5 million, of which the Company had used $13.9 million for issued letters of credit. Borrowings under the Agreement were secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The Agreement contained certain financial and non-financial restrictive covenants including, among others, the requirements to maintain a minimum level of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and a minimum debt coverage ratio. Effective March 25, 2016, the Company terminated its $75 million senior credit facility. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Agreement at the time of its termination. 85 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 9. Commitments Leases The Company leases certain office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements, which expire at various dates through 2021. Certain of the leases contain escalation clauses and provide for the pass-through of increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes. Rent related to leases that have escalation clauses is recognized on a straight-line basis. Resulting deferred rent charges are included in other long-term liabilities and were $1.0 million and $1.2 million, at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum payments under the leases as of September 30, 2016 are as follows: Years ending September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating Lease Payments (in thousands) $ 9,406 8,645 6,607 3,434 1,639 49 Total future minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29,780 Rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $11.5 million, $12.5 million, and $12.1 million, respectively. 10. 401(k) Benefit Plan The Company has a retirement plan (the Plan), which is intended to be a qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan is a defined contribution plan available to all eligible employees and allows participants to contribute up to the legal maximum of their eligible compensation, not to exceed the maximum tax-deferred amount allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Plan also allows the Company to make discretionary matching contributions. For the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company contributed and recorded expense of approximately $1.7 million, $2.4 million, and $2.7 million, respectively, to the Plan. 86 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 11. Income Taxes The components of the provision for income taxes of continuing operations are as follows: Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 (in thousands) Current tax provision (benefit): U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax (benefit) expense: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Federal State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $(32,116) $14,328 2,613 1,888 (1,375) 203 672 176 848 (33,288) 18,829 25,338 3,890 (3,051) 26,177 326 (4,422) (2,187) (6,283) (2,886) (526) 4,240 828 Total provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,025 $(39,571) $19,657 Deferred taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: Deferred tax assets: Net operating losses—Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating losses—U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued vacation and bonus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 30, 2016 2015 (in thousands) $ 8,964 17,086 1,305 1,906 1,311 120 8,105 2,286 1,021 133 3,699 $ 8,586 11,208 4,251 2,817 299 83 7,135 2,808 — — 530 Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . Less: valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,936 (44,257) 37,717 (8,474) Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Amortization of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,679 29,243 9,444 658 — 14,760 472 112 Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,102 $15,344 Net deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8,423) $13,899 87 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 11. Income Taxes (Continued) To simplify the presentation of the deferred income taxes, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-17. The amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has early adopted and chosen to apply the new amendments prospectively effective fiscal year 2016. Prior periods have not been retroactively adjusted. The net current deferred tax asset of $10.1 million is recorded in prepaid and deferred taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015. The net non-current deferred tax asset of approximately $1.0 million and $5.9 million is recorded in deferred tax assets and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net non-current deferred tax liability of approximately $9.4 million and $2.0 million is recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 respectively. The reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the effective rate for continuing operations is as follows: Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 U.S. statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Permanent items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net foreign rate differential Unrecognized tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% (6.3) (4.2) 2.6 1.9 (3.0) (3.8) (2.2) (108.8) 0.5 2.7 (2.5) (0.9) 3.6 Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (82.1)% 27.4% 39.3% At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had federal and state deferred tax assets of $35.8 million and $28.3 million, respectively, related to available federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards and other U.S. deductible temporary differences. The NOL carryforwards expire beginning in 2035 through 2036. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had deferred tax assets related to available foreign NOL carryforwards of approximately $9.0 million and $8.6 million respectively. All but approximately $0.3 million of our foreign NOLs maintain an indefinite carry forward life. The NOLs with limited carryforward periods will expire beginning in 2017 through 2036. The Company assesses available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended September 30, 2016. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other evidence such as our projections for future growth. On the basis of this evaluation, the Company recorded a valuation allowance charge of $35.8 million to bring the total valuation allowance to $44.3 million at September 2016. The Company has not recorded a provision for deferred U.S. tax expense on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries since the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of these foreign subsidiaries outside the U.S. The amount of such undistributed foreign earnings was approximately $10.7 million as of September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, 88 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 11. Income Taxes (Continued) approximately $21.5 million and $23.6 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents was held overseas and not available to fund domestic operations without incurring taxes upon repatriation. The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits: Year ended September 30 (In thousands) 2016 2015 2014 Beginning balance at October 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions based on positions related to the current year . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — — — — — — 725 — — — — — — — — Balance at September 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $725 — — The Company applies the authoritative guidance related to uncertainty in income taxes. ASC 740 states that a benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits. We record unrecognized tax benefits as a reduction to our deferred tax asset for our net operating loss carryforward. We have reduced our net operating loss carryforward by $0.7 million for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal and state exposures. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, are $0.7 million, $0 and $0, respectively, of benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties in the period in which they occur in the income tax provision. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and local jurisdictions and in foreign jurisdictions, primarily Canada and the U.K. Currently, the Company is subject to income tax examinations for fiscal years 2012 through 2015. The Company anticipates no material tax liability to arise from these examinations. The statute of limitations for years prior to fiscal 2013 is now closed. However, certain tax attribute carryforwards that were generated prior to fiscal 2013 may be adjusted upon examination by tax authorities if they are utilized. 12. Equity Transactions 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan In conjunction with the Company’s initial public offering, the board of directors and the Company’s stockholders approved the 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan, on December 2, 2005. The 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan was terminated when the 2006 Plan became effective, immediately after the closing of the initial public offering. A portion of the options and restricted shares granted to employees vest based on certain performance conditions being satisfied by the Company. Performance-based stock options are tied to the Company’s annual performance against pre-established internal targets and the actual payout under these awards may vary from zero to 100% of an employee’s target payout, based upon the Company’s actual performance during the previous twelve months. The performance-based stock options are also 89 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 12. Equity Transactions (Continued) subject to vesting requirements and generally vest when the performance condition has been satisfied. The fair value for stock options granted during the period was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as described in Note 2, and the fair value of restricted shares granted is based on the closing price of the shares on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized when the performance condition has been satisfied or when it becomes probable that the performance condition will be satisfied. Under the 2006 Plan, as amended, 10,000,000 shares of common stock were available for issuance. At September 30, 2014, there were 772,227 shares remaining reserved for issuance in connection with awards under the 2006 Plan. In February 2015, at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan which increased the shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan by 3,000,000 shares and established a fungible share pool so that awards other than options or stock appreciation rights granted after January 9, 2015, would be counted as 1.5 shares from the shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2016, the Company canceled 92,499 options and 214,014 restricted shares with performance conditions because the Compensation Committee, which administers the 2006 Plan, determined the performance goals had become unachievable. At September 30, 2016, there were 456,424 shares remaining reserved for issuance in connection with awards under the 2006 Plan. During fiscal year 2015, the Company issued 737,972 cash-settled stock appreciation rights at the price of $9.35, and 59,156 cash-settled stock appreciation rights were forfeited. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 1,062,668 cash-settled stock appreciation rights at a price of $4.57 and 153,338 cash-settled stock appreciation rights were forfeited. Stock appreciation rights are recorded as liability awards. The maximum number of shares subject to options or stock appreciation rights that can be awarded under the 2006 Plan to any person is 1,000,000 per year. The maximum number of shares that can be awarded under the 2006 Plan to any person, other than pursuant to an option or stock appreciation right, is 700,000 per year. The Company issues stock appreciation rights where restrictions lapse upon either the passage of time (service vesting), achievement of performance targets, or some combination of these conditions. For those stock appreciation rights with only service conditions, the Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the explicit service period. For awards with both performance and service conditions, the Company starts recognizing compensation cost over the remaining service period, when it is probable the performance condition will be met. The stock appreciation rights that include only service conditions generally vest over a period of one to four years conditioned on continued employment for the incentive period. For the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $12.3 million, $12.4 million, and $12.6 million, respectively. The total costs related to unvested awards, not yet recognized, as of September 30, 2016 was $17.1 million, which will be recognized over the weighted average vesting period of 34.1 months. The 2006 Plan permits the granting of options to purchase shares of common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code and stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options (‘‘non-qualified stock options’’). The exercise price of each stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. However, if a grant recipient, who holds at least 10% of the common stock of the Company, receives an incentive stock option, the exercise price of such incentive stock option may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The term of each stock option is fixed by the compensation committee and may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. 90 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 12. Equity Transactions (Continued) The compensation committee may also award under the 2006 Plan: (cid:129) restricted stock, which are shares of common stock subject to restrictions; (cid:129) stock units, which are common stock units subject to restrictions; (cid:129) dividend equivalent rights, which are rights entitling the recipient to receive credits for dividends that would be paid if the recipient had held a specified number of shares of common stock; (cid:129) stock appreciation rights, which are rights to receive a number of shares or, in the discretion of the compensation committee and subject to applicable law, an amount in cash or a combination of shares and cash, based on the increase in the fair market value of the shares underlying the right during a stated period specified by the compensation committee; (cid:129) unrestricted stock, which are shares of common stock granted without restrictions as a bonus; and (cid:129) performance and annual incentive awards, ultimately payable in common stock or cash, as determined by the compensation committee (the compensation committee may grant multi-year and annual incentive awards subject to achievement of specified goals tied to business criteria set forth in the 2006 Plan). Share Repurchase Program The Company is authorized to repurchase issued and outstanding shares of its common stock under a share repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. Share repurchases may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. The repurchase program may be discontinued or suspended at any time, and will be funded using our available cash. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews the share repurchase program periodically, the last such review having occurred in May 2016. We did not repurchase shares under this program during the twelve months ended September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we may repurchase an additional $10.1 million shares under this program. A summary of the Company’s share repurchase activity from fiscal year 2009 to the year ended September 30, 2016 is as follows: Fiscal Year Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 2,962,978 — — — $15.90 — — Total Cash Paid for Shares Purchased — 44,873,000 — — Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) 31,000,000 5,127,000 5,127,000 $10,127,000 (1) On February 5, 2014, our Board of Directors approved an additional $19.0 million for the share repurchase program. On May 5, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved 91 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 12. Equity Transactions (Continued) the repurchase of an additional $5.0 million in shares raising the current amount approved for repurchase, that may yet be expended up to $10.1 million. Stock Option Activity A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014 is as follows: Options outstanding at September 30, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding at September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options 1,592,406 437,755 (383,160) (181,094) 1,465,907 310,177 (14,869) (288,572) 1,472,643 583,228 (1,251) (346,133) Options outstanding at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,708,487 Options exercisable at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 979,633 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $16.46 22.41 10.83 18.14 19.50 9.92 7.09 20.26 17.46 6.68 7.48 16.99 13.91 17.76 The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at September 30, 2016: Range of Exercise Price Options Outstanding Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted- Average Exercise Price Number Outstanding $5.53 - $11.24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11.25 - $46.72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939,057 769,430 7.83 5.02 $ 7.85 21.31 The following table summarizes information about options exercisable at September 30, 2016: Range of Exercise Price Options Exercisable Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life Number Exercisable $5.53 - $11.24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11.25 - $46.72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319,733 659,900 5.12 4.57 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $ 9.42 21.80 92 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 12. Equity Transactions (Continued) The following table summarizes information about assumptions used in valuing options granted: Year ended September 30 2016 2015 2014 Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . Expected forfeiture rate . . . . . . . . . — — 51.5% - 58.6% 71.9% - 77.9% — 50.9% 0.5% - 1.5% 0.26% - 1.4% 0.1% - 1.2% 22.8% 23.5% 22.2% - 22.8% The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable options at September 30, 2016 was approximately $3.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, based on a stock price of $11.24 on September 30, 2016. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $2.07, $4.89, and $7.89, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised at September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014 was approximately $3,128, $4,000, and $1,119,000, respectively. Approximately 0.4 million unvested service-based stock options are expected to vest. Restricted Share Activity A summary of the Company’s restricted share activity for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014 is as follows: Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted shares canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted Shares 1,543,869 1,040,748 (436,204) (250,586) 1,897,827 1,298,604 (343,204) (486,040) 2,367,187 1,504,655 (715,188) (495,409) Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . 2,661,245 Weighted- Average Fair Value $28.89 18.78 24.72 23.87 24.96 10.04 27.50 26.54 16.08 5.54 16.09 20.25 9.34 The intrinsic value and weighted average remaining contractual life in years of unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2016 is approximately $29.9 million and 8.68, respectively, based on a stock price of $11.24 on September 30, 2016. Approximately 1.6 million unvested service-based restricted stock shares are expected to vest. 93 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 13. Fair Value Measurement The Company measures and records in the accompanying consolidated financial statements certain liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Authoritative guidance issued by the FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy for those instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels: Level 1 Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions developed by the Company, which reflect those that a market participant would use. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities measured at fair value. The Company’s financial assets not measured at fair value are cash and cash equivalents (which includes cash and commercial paper with original maturities of less than 90 days). The Company believes the carrying value approximates fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments. 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Certain employees of GoIndustry (UK) Limited (‘‘GoIndustry’’), which the Company acquired in July 2012, are covered by the Henry Butcher Pension Fund and Life Assurance Scheme (the ‘‘Scheme’’), a qualified defined benefit pension plan. The Company recognizes the funded status of its postretirement benefit plans, with a corresponding noncash adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in stockholders’ equity. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and the benefit obligation of the plan. The net periodic benefit cost recognized for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, included the following components: Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 814 (1,066) 964 $ (1,186) $ 1,125 (1,324) Total net periodic benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (252) $ (222) $ (199) Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 2014 (in thousands) 94 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Continued) The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status related to the Company’s qualified defined benefit pension plan for the years ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015: Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 (in thousands) Change in benefit obligation Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss/(gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,069 814 (1,246) 5,999 (3,315) $27,527 964 (1,674) (905) (1,843) Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,321 $24,069 Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 (in thousands) Change in plan assets Beginning balance at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer’s contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency exchange rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,537 4,831 (1,246) 1,482 (3,837) $24,946 1,382 (1,674) 1,613 (1,730) Ending balance at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,767 $24,537 (Underfunded) overfunded status of the plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (554) $ 468 The accrued pension liability of $0.6 million is recorded in Other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Because the plan is closed to new participants, the accumulated benefit obligation is equal to the projected benefit obligation, and totals $26.3 million and $24.1 million at September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively. 95 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Continued) The amount recognized in other comprehensive loss related to the Company’s qualified defined benefit pension plan, net of tax, for the year ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, is shown in the following table: Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan Year ended September 30, 2016 2015 (in thousands) Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New actuarial losses/(gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,321) $ (220) (1,101) 2,547 Accumulated OCI at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,226 $(1,321) Estimated amounts to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost during 2016 based on September 30, 2016 plan measurements are $0. The plan complies with the funding provisions of the UK Pensions Act 2004 and the Occupational Pension Schemes Regulations Act 2005. In fiscal year 2017, the Company expects to contribute $1.4 million to the plan. In addition, the Company expects to make the following pension plan contributions over the next 10 years: Plan Contributions (in thousands) Year ending September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 through 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,358 1,358 340 — — — $3,056 96 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Continued) Actuarial Assumptions The actuarial assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, and to determine the net periodic (benefit) cost for the year were as follows: Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases to non-GMP pensions in payment accrued pre 4/6/97 . . . . . . Increases to non-GMP pensions in payment accrued post 4/6/97 . . . . . Rate of increases to deferred CPI linked benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of increases to deferred RPI linked benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 2015 2.30% 3.70% 3.20% 4.60% 0.00% 0.00% 2.00% 1.90% 2.00% 1.90% 3.10% 3.00% Mortality—100% for males and 105% for females of S2PxA ‘‘light’’ tables, projected in line with 2014 CMI projection model and 1.5% pa long-term rate of improvement. Estimated Future Benefit Payments The Company’s pension plan expects to make the following benefit payments to participants over the next 10 years: Pension Benefits (in thousands) Year ending September 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2022 through 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 859 704 722 748 651 4,119 $7,803 Fair Value Measurements The investment policy and strategy of the plan assets, as established by the Trustees of the plan, strive to maximize the likelihood of achieving primary objectives of the investment policy established for the plan. The primary objectives are: 1) Funding—to ensure that the Plan is fully funded using assumptions that contain a modest margin for prudence. Where an actuarial valuation reveals a deficit, a recovery plan will be put in place which will take into account the financial covenant of the employer; 2) Stability—to have due regard to the likely level and volatility of required contributions when setting the Plan’s investment strategy; and 97 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Continued) 3) Security—to ensure that the solvency position of the Plan is expected to improve. The Trustees will take into account the strength of employer’s covenant when determining the expected improvement in the solvency position of the Plan. The assets are allocated among equity investments and fixed income securities. The assets are not rebalanced but the allocation between equities and bonds is reviewed on a periodic basis to ensure that the investments are appropriate to the Scheme’s circumstances. The Trustees review the investment policy on an ongoing basis, to determine whether a change in the policy or asset allocation targets is necessary. The assets consisted of the following as of September 30, 2016: Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed-income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual 2016 39.1% 58.8% 2.1% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% The class of equity securities consists of one pooled fund whose strategy is to invest in approximately 70% UK company shares (domestic) and 30% international equity securities. The class of fixed-income securities consists of one pooled fund whose strategy is to invest in a limited number of government and corporate bonds. The expected long-term rate of return for the plan’s total assets is based on the expected returns of each of the above categories, weighted based on the current target allocation for each class. The Trustees evaluate whether adjustments are needed based on historical returns to more accurately reflect expectations of future returns. The Company is required to present certain fair value disclosures related to its postretirement benefit plan assets, even though those assets are not included on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents the fair value of the assets of the Company’s qualified defined benefit pension plan by asset category and their level within the fair value hierarchy, which has three levels based on reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant unobservable inputs. Balance as of September 30, 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed-income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 9,692 — 14,477 — 368 $— $ 9,692 14,477 368 — — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $368 $24,169 $— $24,537 (in thousands) 98 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 14. Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Continued) Balance as of September 30, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed-income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $10,087 — 15,149 — 531 $— $10,087 15,149 531 — — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $531 $25,236 $— $25,767 (in thousands) Valuation Techniques The Company relies on pricing inputs from investment fund managers to value investments. The fund manager prices the underlying securities using independent external pricing sources. 15. Guarantees During the second quarter of 2015, the Company issued a guarantee to GoIndustry (the ‘‘Subsidiary’’) and the Trustees (the ‘‘Trustees’’) of the Scheme. Under the arrangement, the Company irrevocably and unconditionally (a) guarantees to the Trustees punctual performance by the Subsidiary of all its Guaranteed Obligations, defined as all present and future obligations and liabilities (whether actual or contingent and whether owed jointly or severally in any capacity whatsoever) of the Company to make payments to the Scheme up to a maximum of 10 million British pounds, (b) undertakes with the Trustees that, whenever the Subsidiary does not pay any amount when due in respect of its Guaranteed Obligations, it must immediately on demand by the Trustees pay that amount as if it were the principal obligor; and (c) indemnifies the Trustees as an independent and primary obligation immediately on demand against any cost, charge, expense, loss or liability suffered or incurred by the Trustees if any payment obligation guaranteed by it is or becomes unenforceable, invalid or illegal; the amount of the cost, charge, expense, loss or liability under this indemnity will be equal to the amount the Trustees would otherwise have been entitled to recover on the basis of a guarantee. The guarantee is a continuing guarantee that will extend to the ultimate balance of all sums payable by the Company in respect of its Guaranteed Obligations. 16. Business Realignment Expenses On October 1, 2014, the Company announced that it had realigned its workforce in response to the new terms and scope of its DoD (third) Surplus Contract for non-rolling stock and to adjust for the efficiencies realized in its commercial business through ongoing integration efforts to support the future vision and growth of the Company. The business realignment included employee reductions across the organization. Business realignment expenses during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, included costs of $1.8 million in employee severance and benefit costs. In September 2015, the Company evaluated its business realignment effort which resulted in a net increase of $0.3 million in accrued expense primarily due to timing changes in commencement of the third DoD Surplus Contract and the delay in the wind-down of the NESA business. 99 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 16. Business Realignment Expenses (Continued) The table below sets forth the significant components and activity in the business realignment initiatives during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. (in thousands) Liability Balance at September 30, 2015 Business Realignment Expenses Cash Payments Liability Balance at September 30, 2016 Employee severance and benefit costs for fiscal 2014 accrual Employee severance and benefit costs for fiscal 2015 accrual . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $356 489 $845 $ (21) $(335) (80) $(101) (409) $(744) $— — $— The business realignment expenses are recorded in costs and expenses from operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and 2016. 17. Termination of the Wal-Mart Agreement As a result of the acquisition of Jacobs Trading Company on October 1, 2011, the Company assumed the rights and obligations of Jacobs Trading Company under Seller’s Master Merchandise Salvage Contract (the ‘‘Wal-Mart Agreement’’) dated May 13, 2011. On December 1, 2014, Wal-Mart provided the Company written notice (the ‘‘Termination Notice’’) terminating the Wal-Mart Agreement effective December 8, 2014. As a result of settlement negotiations following the delivery of the Termination Notice, both parties agreed to a settlement including a mutual release of their respective claims, and Wal-Mart agreed to pay $7.5 million in damages to the Company. The payment was received from Wal-Mart in February 2015. 18. Business Disposition On September 30, 2015, the Company sold certain assets related to the Jacobs Trading Company to Tanager Acquisitions, LLC (the ‘‘Buyer’’). In connection with the disposition, the Buyer assumed certain liabilities related to the Jacobs Trading Company. The Buyer issued the Company a five-year interest bearing promissory note in the amount of $12.3 million. Of the $12.3 million, $11.3 million is recorded in Other assets, and $1 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets as of September 30, 2016. As a result of the disposition, during the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a loss on the disposition of $8.0 million, determined as follows (in thousands): Carrying value of net assets disposed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carrying value of net liabilities disposed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22,920 (2,707) Buyer issued note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,213 (12,250) Loss on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,963 100 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 19. Legal Proceedings Howard v. Liquidity Services, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 14-1183 (D. D. C. 2014). On July 14, 2014, Leonard Howard filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the ‘‘District Court’’) against the Company and its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief accounting officer, on behalf of stockholders who purchased the Company’s common stock between February 1, 2012, and May 7, 2014. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by, among other things, misrepresenting the Company’s growth initiative, growth potential, and financial and operating conditions, thereby artificially inflating its share price, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and costs and expenses, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees. On October 14, 2014, the Court appointed Caisse de D´epˆot et Placement du Qu´ebec and the Newport News Employees’ Retirement Fund as co-lead plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on December 15, 2014, which alleges substantially similar claims but which does not name the chief accounting officer as a defendant. On March 2, 2015, the Company moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim or plead fraud with the requisite particularity. On March 31, 2016, the Court granted that motion in part and denied it in part. On May 16, 2016, the Company answered the amended complaint. Pursuant to the scheduling order in this action, document production shall be substantially complete by January 13, 2017, class certification shall be fully briefed by May 2, 2017, all fact discovery shall be completed by August 31, 2017, and expert discovery shall be completed by February 23, 2018. The Company believes the allegations in the amended complaint are without merit and cannot estimate a range of potential liability, if any, at this time. Billard v. Angrick, et al., Civ. No. 16-1612-BAH (D. D. C. 2016) and Slingerland v. Angrick, et al., Civ. No. 16-1725-BAH (D. D. C. 2016). Two of the Company’s stockholders filed putative derivative actions on behalf of the Company against certain individuals who served on the Company’s Board of Directors or as members of its management between 2012 and 2014. The cases are pending in the District Court. On June 8, 2016, Harold Slingerland filed a putative derivative complaint in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (the ‘‘Superior Court’’), purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain individuals who served on the Company’s Board of Directors or as members of the Company’s management between February 1, 2012, and May 7, 2014. The complaint asserted that, among other things, the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company and its stockholders by supposedly causing or allowing the Company to make the same misstatements that are alleged in the putative class action complaint and exposing the Company to potentially significant costs and expenses in connection with defending that action. The complaint sought monetary damages from the defendants other than the Company, changes to the Company’s corporate governance, disgorgement of any profits, benefits, or other compensation obtained by the director defendants, and an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses for plaintiff’s counsel. The plaintiff in this putative derivative action never served his complaint and, on August 3, 2016, the action was voluntarily dismissed. On August 8, 2016, Thomas Billard filed a putative derivative complaint in the District Court, which challenges conduct similar to that challenged in the Slingerland complaint filed in the Superior Court, and which asserts claims against the Company’s Board and certain former Board members and members of management. The Billard complaint asserts derivative claims for breach of fiduciary, waste, 101 Liquidity Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 19. Legal Proceedings (Continued) unjust enrichment, and insider trading. On August 24, 2016, the District Court entered a briefing schedule pursuant to which the defendants shall move to dismiss the Billard complaint solely on forum non conveniens grounds based on a Delaware forum selection clause contained in the Company’s bylaws, without prejudice to any other grounds for dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b) or 23.1. This motion is fully briefed and awaiting decision. On August 25, 2016, the Slingerland plaintiff filed a putative derivative complaint in the District Court that alleges substantially the same claims as raised in the Billard derivative complaint. On October 21, 2016, the Court entered an order staying the defendants’ obligation to respond to this complaint to and including January 19, 2017. On September 23, 2016, the plaintiffs and defendants in the Billard and Slingerland actions filed a proposed stipulation and order that would consolidate the two actions into a ‘‘Consolidated Action’’ and that provides that defendants’ motion to dismiss the Billard complaint on forum non conveniens grounds is deemed to have been made in the Consolidated Action. The proposed stipulation and order further provides that if defendants’ motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds is denied, the parties to the Consolidated Action shall submit a proposed order setting forth a deadline for the filing of a consolidated complaint and subsequent motions and deadline. The Company believes the allegations in both complaints are without merit and cannot estimate a range of potential liability, if any, at this time. 20. Quarterly Results (Unaudited) The following table sets forth for the eight most recent quarters the selected unaudited quarterly consolidated statement of operations data. The unaudited quarterly consolidated statement of operations data has been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of this data. Dec. 31, 2014 Mar. 31, 2015 June 30, 2015 Sept. 30, 2015 Dec. 31, 2015 Mar. 31, 2016 June 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2016 (in thousands, except share and per share data) Three months ended Revenue from operations . . . . . . . . $ 125,143 $ 102,943 $ 89,746 $ 79,293 $ 65,875 $ 86,878 $ 85,188 $ 78,513 (Loss) income before provision for income taxes from operations . $ Net (loss) income from (84,996) $ 3,811 $ (6) $ (63,024) $ (7,351) $ (1,117) $ (141) $ (24,291) operations . . . . . . . . $ (64,116) $ 1,381 $ 1,615 $ (43,695) $ (5,197) $ (850) $ (124) $ (53,755) Basic (loss) earnings per common share . . . . . $ (2.14) $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ (1.46) $ (0.17) $ (0.03) $ (0.00) $ (1.75) Diluted (loss) earnings per common share . . . $ (2.14) $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ (1.46) $ (0.17) $ (0.03) $ (0.00) $ (1.75) Basic weighted average shares outstanding . . . 29,926,273 29,988,324 30,011,121 30,026,223 30,490,670 30,594,940 30,726,554 30,740,977 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . 29,926,273 29,988,324 30,011,121 30,026,223 30,490,670 30,594,940 30,726,554 30,740,977 102 LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (dollars in thousands) Balance at beginning of period Charged (credited) to expense Reductions Balance at end of period Deferred tax valuation allowance (deducted from net deferred tax assets) Year ended September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts (deducted from accounts receivable) Year ended September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory allowance (deducted from inventory) Year ended September 30, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended September 30, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,424 7,216 8,474 891 1,042 471 1,452 1,723 770 1,792 1,258 35,783 240 1,243 247 271 (575) 2,709 — — — 7,216 8,474 44,257 89 1,814 — — 378 33 1,042 471 718 1,723 770 3,446 103 Exhibit No. 3.1 3.2 4.1 10.1 10.1.2 10.2 10.3 EXHIBIT INDEX Description Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-129656), filed with the SEC on January 17, 2006. Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 4, 2016. Form of Certificate of Common Stock of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-129656), filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006. Executive Employment Agreement, dated January 27, 2005, between the Company and James M. Rallo, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-129656), filed with the SEC on February 1, 2006.# Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and James M. Rallo, dated January 25, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-129656), filed with the SEC on February 1, 2006.# Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-129656), filed with the SEC on February 1, 2006.# Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2013, by and between the Company and Leoncio Casusol, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 4, 2013.# 10.3.1 Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Leoncio Casusol, dated as of June 13, 2016, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016.# 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.6.1 10.7 Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2014, by and between the Company and Thomas B. Burton, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report filed with the SEC on November 21, 2014.# Liquidity Services, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on January 26, 2015.# Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant under 2006 Omnibus Long Term Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 4, 2006.# Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant, under 2006 Omnibus Long Term Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2008.# Surplus Usable Property Sales Contract (Sales Contract Number 08-0001-0001) between Liquidity Services, Inc. and the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of Defense, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 6, 2008. 104 Exhibit No. 10.7.1 10.7.2 10.7.3 10.7.4 10.8 10.9 10.9.1 10.10 10.10.1 10.11 10.12 Description Supplemental Agreement 1 (Sales Contract Number 08-0001-0001), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 5, 2009. Supplemental Agreement No. 6 relating to Surplus Usable Property Sales Contract (Sales Contract Number 08-0001-0001) between Liquidity Services, Inc. and the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of Defense, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 17, 2012. Supplemental Agreement No. 8, dated January 17, 2014, relating to the modification of Surplus Usable Property Sales Contract (Sales Contract Number 08-0001-0001), as amended, between the Company and DLA Disposition Services, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 21, 2014. Notice of Award, Statement, and Release Document, dated January 17, 2014, relating to Surplus Usable Property Sales Contract (Sales Contract Number 08-0001-0001), as amended, between the Company and DLA Disposition Services, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 21, 2014. Shareholders’ Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 among Liquidity Services, Inc., Jacobs Trading, LLC, WGD, Inc., Irwin L. Jacobs and Howard Grodnick, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 1, 2011. Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 10, 2014, by and between the Company and Gardner Dudley, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Annual Report filed with the SEC on November 21, 2014.# Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Gardner H. Dudley, dated as of June 13, 2016, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016.# Notice of Award, Statement, and Release Document, dated February 13, 2015, relating to the Surplus Contract between the Company and the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services of the U.S. Department of Defense, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2015. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Mutual Agreement for Contract (15-0001-0001) dated February 13, 2015, relating to the Surplus Contract between the Company and the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services of the U.S. Department of Defense, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 21, 2015. Notice of Award, Statement and Release Document (Contract Number 15-5601-0001) dated June 8, 2015 issued by DLA Disposition Services, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015. Executive Employment Agreement dated July 20, 2015 by and between the Company and Jorge Celaya, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015.# 105 Exhibit No. 10.13 Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and William P. Angrick, dated as of June 13, 2016, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016.# Description 10.14 Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Mark A. Shaffer, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 13, 2016.# 21.1 23.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 31.3 32.1 32.2 32.3 101 List of Subsidiaries. Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. Power of Attorney (included on signature page). Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The following materials from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. # Designates management or compensation plans. 106 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on November 21, 2016. SIGNATURES LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. By: /s/ WILLIAM P. ANGRICK, III William P. Angrick, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer We, the undersigned directors and officers of Liquidity Services, Inc., hereby severally constitute William P. Angrick, III and Mark A. Shaffer, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on November 21, 2016. Signature Title /s/ WILLIAM P. ANGRICK, III William P. Angrick, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ JORGE A. CELAYA Jorge A. Celaya /s/ MICHAEL SWEENEY Michael Sweeney /s/ PHILLIP A. CLOUGH Phillip A. Clough /s/ GEORGE H. ELLIS George H. Ellis /s/ PATRICK W. GROSS Patrick W. Gross /s/ BEATRIZ V. INFANTE Beatriz V. Infante Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director /s/ EDWARD J. KOLODZIESKI Director Edward Kolodzieski /s/ JAIME MATEUS-TIQUE Jaime Mateus-Tique Director 107 (This page has been left blank intentionally.) (This page has been left blank intentionally.) (This page has been left blank intentionally.) A LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS Fellow shareholders: Our business was founded to transform the underserved reverse supply chain market and create value for all constituencies – sellers, buyers, and our planet – by enabling the world to better manage surplus assets with transparency, compliance, and convenience. By making it easy for end users, entrepreneurs, and small businesses to securely connect with the millions of surplus and idle assets residing in the world’s supply chains, everybody wins. Another rewarding aspect of our business is its positive Our Strategy impact on the environment. In April we celebrated Earth Day’s 46th anniversary by recognizing how our global online marketplaces play a critical role in zero- waste initiatives. This year we eclipsed the cumulative sale of over 3 billion pounds of scrap material, diverting material that might have otherwise been destined for landfills. Indeed, our use of technology, robust marketplaces, valuation data, and integrated services has allowed our team to advance our mission and develop the leading reverse supply solution. Our tagline “A Better Future for Surplus” reinforces our purpose and in this Annual Report we celebrate how we are providing meaningful solutions to diverse clients across the $130 billion global reverse supply chain market. With 3 million registered buyers, a large and growing roster of blue-chip clients, and over $6 billion in gross merchandise volume (GMV) sold, Liquidity Services is the unrivaled leader in the reverse supply chain market, with unmatched expertise to intelligently manage, value, and sell assets. The breadth and liquidity of our marketplace was on display during FY16: • On behalf of over 9,000 clients we completed 574,000 transactions totaling $642 million in GMV. We are well positioned to serve any seller for virtually any asset type across every major industry sector. To further capture this large addressable market, we are focused on growing the size and scale of our global e-commerce solution to better serve and create enhanced value for retailers, manufacturers, and government agencies with the following key priorities: • Grow the volume transacted on our e-commerce platform in our core industry verticals with both large Global 5000 and small and middle market organizations; • Grow our market share by providing flexible service offerings and pricing models suited to individual client needs; • Provide full asset lifecycle solutions to leverage our marketplaces from initial purchase of new assets to final disposition of used assets; • Expand our ecosystem of partners who capture value by leveraging our e-commerce platform, buyer liquidity, and data; and • Execute our LiquidityOne transformation program to enable new functionality and greater efficiencies through the development of our new e-commerce platform, financial systems, and back office • Assets sold spanned approximately 500 individual asset categories in many key industry verticals, including: Energy, Government, Industrial, Retail, and Transportation. infrastructure. FY16 Results • Sales took place from client locations across North America, Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and South America. • Buyers hailed from around the globe and purchased assets in new, used, salvage, and scrap conditions. Our results for fiscal year 2016, while disappointing due to the impact of lower commodity prices and the transitioning of selected retail and Department of Defense (DoD) contracts, reflected our commitment to invest in our long-term strategy by expanding our service offerings, positioning our commercial marketplaces for accelerated growth, and focusing on our seller and buyer experience CORPORATE INFORMATION Executive Officers William P. Angrick, III CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors Jorge Celaya Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Leoncio Casusol Chief Information Officer Michael Sweeney Chief Accounting Officer Board of Directors William P. Angrick, III Chairman of the Board Phillip A. Clough Director George H. Ellis Director Patrick W. Gross Lead Director Beatriz Infante Director Edward J. Kolodzieski Director Jaime Mateus-Tique Director James M. Rallo President, Retail Supply Chain Group Gardner Dudley President, Capital Assets Group Additional Information Roger Gravley President, GovDeals Mark Shaffer VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Mike Lutz Vice President, Human Resources INVESTOR RELATIONS Julie Davis Senior Director of Investor Relations Phone: 202.558.6234 julie.davis@liquidityservices.com STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Computershare Trust Company, N.A. PO Box 43010 Providence, RI 02940-3010 Phone: 781.575.4238 www.computershare.com CORPORATE SECRETARY Mark Shaffer VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Ernst & Young LLP 8484 Westpark Drive McLean, VA, 22102 Phone: 703.747.1000 Liquidity Services provides clients with global coverage for their reverse supply chain needs. With 44 locations in 19 countries and buyers in nearly 200 countries and territories, we can manage, value, and sell your surplus assets virtually anywhere in the world. 2016 Annual Report Building a Better Future for Surplus United States Anaheim, CA Atlanta, GA (2) East Brunswick, NJ Fontana, CA Fort Worth, TX Frisco, TX Garland, TX Groveport, OH Hayward, CA Houston, TX Lockbourne, OH Montgomery, AL Nashville, TN New Castle, DE North Las Vegas, NV North Wilkesboro, NC Oklahoma City, OK Owings Mills, MD Plainfield, IN Scottsdale, AZ Washington, DC Argentina* Buenos Aires Australia Victoria Canada Brampton, ON China Hong Kong Shanghai Colombia* Bogota Costa Rica* Heredia *Locations of committed strategic partners Ecuador* Quito France Vanves Germany Munich Ireland* Dublin Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Peru* Surco South Korea* Seoul Philippines Muntinlupa City Spain Barcelona Singapore Singapore South Africa* Cape Town Johannesburg United Kingdom Birmingham Leeds London About Liquidity Services Liquidity Services (NASDAQ: LQDT) works with clients to ensure surplus is intelligently transformed from a burden into a liquid opportunity that fuels the achievement of strategic goals. Our superior service, unmatched scale, and ability to deliver results enable us to forge trusted, long-term relationships with over 9,000 clients, including Fortune 1000 and Global 500 organizations as well as government agencies. With over $6 billion in completed transactions, 3 million registered buyers, and reach into almost 200 countries and territories, we are the proven market leader in delivering smart surplus solutions. North America: 844.704.0367 Info@LiquidityServices.com Europe: 800.2007.0312 Asia Pacific: 800.1408.1960 LS0278_0117 LiquidityServices.com