Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Lucara Diamond Group

Lucara Diamond Group

luc · TSX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker luc
Exchange TSX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Lucara Diamond Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
MD&A	
  and	
  Consolidated	
  
Financial	
  Statements	
  

Year	
  Ending:	
  December	
  31,	
  2013	
  

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 
DECEMBER 31, 2013 

Management’s  discussion  and  analysis  (“MD&A”)  focuses  on  significant  factors  that  have  affected 
Lucara Diamond Corp. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries performance and such factors that may 
affect  its  future  performance.  In  order  to  better  understand  the  MD&A,  it  should  be  read  in 
conjunction  with  the  audited  consolidated  financial  statements  of  the  Company  for  the  year  ended 
December  31,  2013,  which  are  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards  (“IFRS”  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards  Board  (“IASB”).  All  amounts 
are expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. The effective date of this MD&A is February 
20, 2014. 

Some of the statements in this MD&A are forward-looking statements that are subject to risk factors 
set out in the cautionary note contained herein. 

Additional  information  about  the  Company  and  its  business  activities  is  available  on  SEDAR  at 
www.sedar.com. 

HIGHLIGHTS 

Safety:  There  were  no  Lost  Time  Injury  (“LTI’s”)  and  no  reportable  environmental  incidents  at 
Karowe  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013.     Karowe’s  full  year  Lost  Time  Injuries  Frequency  Rate 
(“LTIFR”) was 0.17.  LTIFR is defined as the total number of work hours lost per 200,000 work hours.   

Cash  flows,  cash  operating  margins  and  year  end  diamond  inventory:  The  Company 
achieved revenue of $47.9 million ($433 per carat) from sales of  110,635 carats of diamond during 
the  fourth  quarter  of  2013  including  one  exceptional  stone  tender.   This  excludes  revenue  of  $10.9 
million, which was received during the quarter from Karowe’s late September tender.   At an average 
operating  expense  of  $109  per  carat,  the  cash  operating  margin  during  the  quarter  was  $324  per 
carat.  

Full  year  sales  of  438,717  carats  achieved  proceeds  of  $180.5  million,  or  $411  per  carat.    The 
Company achieved a full year cash operating margin of $311 per carat based on operating expenses 
of $100 per carat.  Full year operating cost per tonne milled was $18 compared to budget of $23 per 
tonne.    Attention  to  cost  control  and  the  revenues  from  exceptional  stone  tenders  have  resulted  in 
the  Company  achieving  a  full  year  earnings  before  deducting  interest  and  other  financial  charges, 
income  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization  (“EBITDA”  see  page  7  Non-IFRS  measures)  of  $102.9 
million in its first full year of operations. 

At  year  end  the  Company  was  well  positioned  for  2014  with  a  significant  diamond  inventory  of 
approximately  67,000  carats  of  diamond,  including  a  selection  of  exceptional  stones  totalling  over 
1,000 carats.  The Company expects to hold its first Exceptional Stone Tender of 2014, early in the 
second quarter.  

Exceptional stone tenders:  The Company continued to recover large and exceptional diamonds, 
resulting  in  an  exceptional  stone  tender  during  the  quarter  achieving  revenue  of  $22.9  million 
($20,280  per  carat).    During  2013  the  Company  held  three  exceptional  stone  tenders  achieving 
revenues of $72.1 million (2,971 carats at $24,290 per carat). 

Net  cash  position:  The  Company  continued  to  achieve  strong  cash  operating  earnings  of  $39.0 
million  during  the  quarter  and  $118.6  million  for  the  year  resulting  in  a  year-end  cash  balance  of 
$49.4  million.    Management  expects  to  use  the  existing  cash  resources  to  finance  Karowe’s  plant 
upgrade capital expenditure during 2014.    At year-end the Company remains debt free with the $25 
million Scotiabank credit facility being undrawn.   

	
  
 
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Karowe operating performance: Karowe exceeded budget in terms of carats recovered and sold 
and  surpassed  its  initial  and  updated  revenue  forecast  of  $90  million  and  $118  million  respectively 
due largely to the recovery of its large and exceptional diamonds.  

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

In millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted 

Revenues  
Proceeds from quarterly sales tenders is comprised of: 

Sales proceeds received during the period 
September tender proceeds received in October 

Total proceeds from quarterly sales tenders 

   Average price per carat sold (excluding September tender 

proceeds received in October) 
   Operating expenses per carat sold 
   Cash operating margin per carat 

Net income (loss) for the period 
Income (loss) per share 
Cash flow from operations (before working capital adjustments) 
Cash on hand 

OUTLOOK 

Three months ended 
December 31 

Year Ended 
December 31 

2013 

$  58.7 

47.8 
10.9 
58.7 

433    

109 
324 

21.3 
0.05 
33.9 
49.4 

2012 

2013 

2012 

$ 29.1    

$ 180.5  

$  41.8 

29.1 
- 
29.1 

289      

84   
205   

(4.1) 
(0.01) 
3.8 
13.3 

180.5 
- 
180.5 

411  

100 
311 

65.2 
0.17 
99.6 
49.4 

41.8 
- 
41.8 

$274  

92 
182 

(7.5) 
(0.02) 
(3.8) 
13.3 

This section of the MD&A provides management's production and cost estimates for 2014.  These are 
“forward-looking statements” and subject to the cautionary note regarding the risks associated with 
forward-looking statements. 

Karowe Mine, Botswana 

Karowe  is  forecast  to  process  2.2-2.4  million  tonnes  of  ore  and  to  produce  and  sell  400,000  to 
420,000 carats of diamond in 2014.  Revenue is forecast between $150 - $160 million.   

Ore mined is forecast between 3.0 – 3.5 million tonnes and waste mined is expected to be between 
10.0 – 11.0 million tonnes. 

Karowe’s operating cash costs (see page 7 Non-IRFS measures) are expected to be between $31-$33 
per tonne ore treated.   

Capital  expenditures  include  between  $45-$50  million  for  Karowe’s  plant  upgrade  to  improve  large 
diamond  recovery  following  the  occurrence  of  exceptional  stones,  and  to  enable  sustainable 
processing of hard ore in the south lobe.  Sustaining capital expenditures is forecast at $3.5 million.   

The Company plans on holding eight diamond tenders and two exceptional stone tenders during the 
year.  The timing of these tenders will be based on Karowe’s production profile as well as commercial 
decisions to maximize diamond revenue. 

Karowe’s  detailed  operating  performance  and  capital  spend  guidance  is  available  on  SEDAR  at 
www.sedar.com.   

BUSINESS OVERVIEW 

The Company is a diamond mining company focused in Africa. The business of the Company consists 
of  the  acquisition,  exploration,  development  and  operation  of  diamond  properties.  The  Company’s 
head  office  is  in  Vancouver,  BC,  Canada  and  its  common  shares  trade  on  the  Toronto  Stock 
Exchange,  the  NASDAQ  OMX  First  North  in  Sweden  and  the  Botswana  Stock  Exchange  under  the 
symbol “LUC”. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  principal  assets  of  the  Company  and  the  focus  of  the  Company’s  operations,  development  and 
exploration activities are on assets in Lesotho and Botswana.  

The following summarizes the Company’s current land holdings: 

Country 

Name 

Botswana 

Karowe Diamond License 

Lesotho 

Mothae Diamond Mining Lease 

Interest 
Held 

100% 

75% 

Area 
(km2) 

15.3 

20.0 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

Karowe Mine, Botswana  

Sales 
Revenues 
Proceeds generated from sales tenders conducted in the quarter 
are comprised of: 
   Sales proceeds received during the quarter 
   September tender proceeds received in October 
   Sales proceeds received post June period end 
Carats sold for proceeds generated during the period  
Carats sold for revenues recognized during the period 
Average price per carat for proceeds generated during the period 

UNIT 

Q4-13 

Q3-13 

Q2-13 

Q1-13 

Q4-12 

US$m 
US$m 

US$m 
US$m 
US$m 
Carats 
Carats 
US$ 

58.7 
47.8 

58.7 
(10.9) 
- 
110,635 
127,804 
433 

42.1 
50.9 

42.1 
10.9 
(2.1) 
80,918 
76,582 
625 

47.2 
49.3 

32.5 
32.5 

29.1 
29.1 

47.2 
- 
2.1 
102,452 
89,619 
481 

32.5 
- 
- 
144,712 
144,712 
225 

29.1 
- 
- 
100,987 
100,987 
289 

Production 
Tonnes mined (ore) 
Tonnes mined (waste) 
Tonnes milled 
Average grade processed 
Carats recovered 

Costs 

Tonnes 
Tonnes 
Tonnes 
cpht (*) 
Carats 

918,765 
1,694,134 
613,064 
18.9 
116,061 

898,501 
1,430,105 
647,304 
17.6 
113,882 

1,157,747 
1,259,479 
560,910 
15.6 
87,580 

969,330 
1,109,727 
533,260 
23.1 
123,228 

701,931 
1,267,343 
545,354 
25.4 
138,487 

Operating costs per carats sold (see page 7 Non-IRFS measures) 
Capital expenditures 

US$ 
US$m 

109 
1.5 

110 
2.4 

102 
1.7 

86 
2.2 

84 
0.4 

(*)	
  carats	
  per	
  hundred	
  tonnes 

Operational performance at Karowe was as per forecast for the last quarter of 2013.  Tonnes of 
ore mined were on target, and overall waste stripping was well advanced to access the deeper 
sections of the ore body in the south lobe as per the life of mine plan. The mine currently has 
three  months  of  ore  exposed  providing  flexibility  of  material  processed.  The  process  plant 
performed well during the quarter, and tonnes processed and carats produced were in line with 
forecast.  

The  first  full  year  of  operations  at  Karowe  was  very  successful  with  production  and  cost 
targets  either  being  met  or  exceeded.  The  2013  year  end  target  of  440,000  carats  recovered 
was surpassed.	
  

The  frequency  of  special  stones  (+10.8  carats)  recovered  during  the  quarter  was  significant 
with 190 stones recovered with an average size of over 26 carats. This included five stones of 
over  100  carats  and  a  single  281  carat  stone.  The  recovery  of  specials  during  2013  far 
exceeded  expectations  with  732  specials  recovered  with  a  total  weight  of  over  18,000  carats 
equating to 4% of annual production.  Included in this were 17 stones over 100 carats and 4 
stones over 200 carats.	
  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 	
  
 	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  geological  resource  update  was  completed  during  the  quarter,  which  demonstrated 
superior  value  through  the  recognition  of  a  continued  presence  of  exceptional  stones  within 
the  centre  and  south  lobes.    This  is  now  reflected  in  the  size  frequency  distributions  and  an 
increase in average modeled price to $394 per carat for an indicated mineral resource of 46.2 
million tonnes with an average grade of 16 carats per hundred tonnes. The NI43-101 technical 
report  accompanying  the  resource  update  was  published  on  February  3,  2014  and  can  be 
found at www.sedar.com. 

REVIEW OF PROJECTS 

Mothae Diamond Project, Lesotho 

The Mothae project is located in northeast Lesotho and is a large low grade kimberlite containing a 
population of large, high value Type IIa diamonds. 

The Company is currently reviewing a number of development options for Mothae.  

Karowe, Plant Optimization Project 

Karowe’s plant optimization project to modify the process plant to treat the harder material at depth 
and  improve  the  recovery  of  exceptional  diamonds  is  advancing.  Orders  have  been  completed  for 
some long lead items, and the project schedule is on track to be complete by year end.   

SELECT ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

In millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted 

Revenues 
Operating expenses 
Royalty expenses 
Cash operating earnings (1) 
Exploration and other mining costs 
Administration 
Gain on sale of exploration program diamonds 
Sales and marketing 
EBITDA (2) 
Depletion, amortization and accretion 
Finance income (expenses) 
Foreign exchange gain (loss) 
Income tax expense 
Net income (loss) for the year 

Total equity 
Cash flow from operations (before working capital 
adjustments) 
Total assets 
Cash on hand 
Income (loss) per share (basic and 
diluted) 

Per carat sold  
Sales price 
Operating expenses 

  $   

2013 

180.5  $  
(43.8) 
(18.1) 
118.6 
(1.3) 
(11.4) 
0.5 
(3.5) 
102.9 
(15.0) 
(3.8) 
(3.9) 
(15.0) 
65.2 

202.9 

99.6 
247.2 
49.4 
0.17 

Year ended December 31,   
2011   

2012 

41.8  $ 

(14.0) 
(4.2) 
23.6 
(12.8) 
(9.5) 
- 
(1.5) 
(0.2) 
(5.9) 
(3.1) 
1.7 
- 
(7.5) 

157.5 

3.8 
235.4 
13.3 
(0.02) 

-   
-   
-   
-   

(6.6) 
(8.2) 
2.3 
- 
(12.5) 
- 
(1.9) 
(4.3) 
- 
(18.7) 

170.4 

(11.7) 
241.3 
48.6 
(0.05) 

$ 

411  $ 
100 

274 
92 

- 
- 

(1)  Cash operating earnings is a non-IFRS measure (page 7) defined as sales less operating expenses and royalty expenses. 
(2)  EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure (page 7) defined as earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortization. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Revenues 

During the year the Company had sales totalling 438,717 carats for gross proceeds of $180.5 million 
at  an  average  price  of  $411  per  carat.  The  increase  in  revenues  of  $138.7  million  compared  to  the 
prior year is due to a full year’s production and the corresponding sales as well as the sale of large 
exceptional  stones,  which  contributed  $72  million  to  revenues.  In  2012  the  Company  commenced 
production and declared commercial production at Karowe as at July 1, 2012.   

Cash operating earnings 

Cash  operating  earnings  for  the  year  ended  December  31  2013  were  $118.6  million  resulting  in  a 
cash  operating  margin  (before  royalties)  of  76%.    Full  year  operating  expenses  at  $100  per  carat 
resulted in a cash operating margin of $311 per carat.    

Cash operating earnings is a non-IFRS measure and is reconciled in the table above. 

Exploration and other mining costs 

Exploration  expenditures  and  other  mining  costs  relating  to  the  Mothae  project  were  $1.3  million 
during  2013  compared  to  $12.8  million  in  2012.  The  decrease  is  due  to  Mothae  being  on  care  and 
maintenance during the year compared to the previous year when the Company was completing its 
trial mining program.  

Administration expenses 

Administration expenses were $11.4 million in 2013 compared to $9.5 million in 2012. The increase of 
$1.9  million  was  due  largely  to  accrued  employee  performance  payments,  higher  professional  fee 
expenditures due to the preparation of the Company’s resource update and contribution to the Lundin 
Foundation.  

Income Tax expense  

Income  tax  expense  was  $15.0  million  during  the  year.  This  is  mainly  due  to  the  recognition  of  a 
deferred  tax  liability  during  the  year,  which  resulted  in  a  corresponding  non-cash  future  income  tax 
expense  of  $14.9  million.  The  deferred  tax  liability  relates  to  temporary  differences  between  the 
accounting and tax base of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, restoration provisions and 
non-capital tax loss pools. The Company has applied a significant portion of its non-capital losses in 
Botswana against taxable income during the year. 

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 

Full  year  EBITDA  was  $102.9  million  compared  to  a  loss  in  the  previous  year  of  $0.2  million.    This 
increase  was  due  to  an  additional  285,993  carats  sold  during  the  year,  including  three  exceptional 
stone tenders achieving $72.1 million and lower exploration costs following Mothae being placed on 
care and maintenance during 2013.   

EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure and is reconciled in the table above. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 

As at December 31, 2013, the Company had cash of $49.4 million compared to cash of $13.3 million 
at  December  31,  2012  and  $33.6  million  at  September  30,  2013.    The  December  sale’s  royalty 
payment was not paid until January 2014. 

Cash  generated  from  operating  activities  before  working  capital  movements  for  the  year  ended 
December  31,  2013  was  an  inflow  of  $99.6  million.  These  proceeds  were  offset  by  the  Company’s 
repayment  of  its  $50  million  debenture  as  well  as  repayment  of  the  outstanding  balance  of  the 
Company’s  revolving  credit  facility  of  $4.5  million.  In  addition,  the  Company  incurred  capital 
expenditures of $7.9 million, which includes payment of $2.9 million for project retentions during the 
year, which had been previously accrued.   

In  April  2012,  the  Company  signed  a  definitive  agreement  with  the  Bank  of  Nova  Scotia  for  a  $25 
million revolving term credit facility with a maturity date of March 26, 2014, which may be extended if 
both parties agree.  

The  facility  contains  financial  and  non-financial  covenants  customary  for  a  facility  of  this  size  and 
nature. As at December 31, 2013 and to date, the Company was in compliance with all financial and 
non-financial  covenants.  The  applicable  interest  rate  of  any  loan  advances  under  the  facility  will  be 
determined by the Company’s leverage ratio at that time. The Company has provided security on the 
two  year  facility  by  way  of  a  charge  over  the  Company’s  Karowe  assets  and  a  guarantee  by  the 
Company’s  subsidiaries,  which  hold  the  Karowe  assets.  As  at  December  31,  2013  the  full  amount 
under this facility was available. 

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS 

(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data) 

The Company’s financial statements are reported under IFRS issued by the IASB. The following table 
provides  highlights,  extracted  from  the  Company’s  financial  statements,  of  quarterly  results  for  the 
past eight quarters (unaudited): 

Three months ended 

Dec-13 

Sept-13 

Jun-13  Mar-13 

Dec-12 

Sept-12 

Jun-12  Mar-12 

A. Revenues 

58,683 

42,096 

47,224 

32,504 

29,172 

12,658 

Nil 

Nil 

B. Exploration (expenditures) 

recovery 

(167) 

(389) 

(557) 

374 

(2,277) 

(4,465) 

(2,798) 

(3,314) 

C. Administration expenses  

(4,871) 

(1,851) 

(2,761) 

(1,946) 

(1,798) 

(2,980) 

(3,392) 

(1,364) 

D. Net income (loss) 

21,331 

15,043 

22,679 

6,169 

7,664 

(3,413) 

(7,606) 

(4,170) 

E. Earnings (loss) per share 

(basic and diluted) 

Revenues 

0.05 

0.04 

0.06 

0.02 

0.02 

(0.01) 

(0.02) 

(0.01) 

During  the  three  months  ended  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  completed  three  diamond 
tenders,  one  of  which  was  an  exceptional  diamond  tender.  The  exceptional  diamond  tender 
generated  gross  proceeds  of  $22.9  million  or  $20,280  per  carat.  The  tenders  achieved  winning 
bids totalling $47.8 million or $433 per carat. During the three months ended December 31, 2013, 
the  Company  received  proceeds  of  $10.9  million  (17,642  carats)  from  tenders  completed  in  the 
previous quarter, which had not been collected at the end of the third quarter and therefore this 
revenue  has  have  been  recognized  during  the  current  period  in  the  Company’s  consolidated 
statement of operations.  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exploration and other mining costs 

Exploration  expenditures  and  other  mining  costs  relating  to  the  Mothae  project  were  $0.2  million 
during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013  compared  to  $1.3  million  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012.  The 
decrease in costs follows Mothae being placed on care and maintenance. 

Administration expenses 

Administration  expenses  increased  $3.0  million  during  the  quarter  when  compared  to  the  previous 
three month period due largely to accrued employee performance payments, higher professional fee 
expenditures due to the preparation of the Company’s resource update and contribution to the Lundin 
Foundation of $0.3 million for social programs in Botswana and Lesotho.  

NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES 

This MD&A refers to certain financial measures, such as cash operating earnings and EBITDA, which 
are  not  measures  recognized  under  IFRS  and  do  not  have  a  standardized  meaning  prescribed  by 
IFRS. These measures may differ from those made by other corporations and accordingly may not be 
comparable to such measures as reported by other corporations. These measures have been derived 
from  the  Company’s  financial  statements,  and  applied  on  a  consistent  basis,  because  the  Company 
believes they are of assistance in the understanding of the results of operations and financial position. 

Cash operating earnings (see “Select Annual Financial Information”) is the term the Company uses to 
describe  the  cash  that  is  generated  from  sales  net  of  cost  of  goods  sold,  excluding  depletion, 
amortization and accretion, and excluding the effect of changes in working capital. 

EBITDA (see “Select Annual Financial Information”) is the term the Company uses as an approximate 
measure  of  the  Company’s  pre-tax  operating  cash  flow  and  is  generally  used  to  better  measure 
performance  and  evaluate  trends  of  individual  assets.  EBITDA  comprises  earnings  before  deducting 
interest  and  other  financial  charges,  income  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization  and  net  loss 
attributable to non-controlling interests. 

Operating  costs  per  carats  sold  (see  “Karowe  Mine,  Botswana”)  is  the  term  the  Company  uses  to 
describe  the  mining,  processing  and  site  administration  costs  to  produce  a  single  carat  of  diamond.  
This is calculated as operating costs per carat of diamond sold. 

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  incurred  the  following  expenses  with 
Namdo  Management  Services  Limited  (“Namdo”)  and  Mile  High  Holdings  Ltd.  (“Mile  High”), 
companies  related  by  way  of  directors  in  common.  The  Company  also  incurred  professional 
geological  services  and  laboratory  related  expenditures  from  the  Mineral  Services  Group  (“MS 
Group”), a company that is associated with a former director of Company. Beginning July 1, 2013, 
the MS Group is no longer a related party.  

(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) 

Description of services 

Management fees 
Donations  
Exploration related expenditures 
Aircraft charter 

Related Party 

Namdo 
Lundin Foundation 
MS Group 
Mile High 

December 31, 
2013 

December 31, 
2012 

$     489   

253 
84 
71 

$     897     

$    504 
- 
1,916 
382 
$  2,802 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

Financial  assets  and  liabilities  have  been  classified  into  categories  that  determine  their  basis  of 
measurement and, for items measured at fair value, whether changes in fair value are recognized in 
the consolidated statements of operations or consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Those 
categories are: fair value through profit or loss; loans and receivables; available for sale assets; and, 
for liabilities, amortized cost.  

The fair value of the Company’s available for sale financial instruments is derived from quoted prices 
in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates 
their carrying amounts due to the fact that there have been no significant changes in the Company’s 
own  credit  risk.  The  fair  value  of  all  other  financial  instruments  of  the  Company  approximates  their 
carrying values because of the demand nature or short-term maturity of these instruments. 

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  the  Company  is  inherently  exposed  to  currency  and  commodity 
price  risk.  For  a  discussion  of  certain  risks  and  assumptions  that  relate  to  the  use  of  derivatives, 
including  equity  market  risk,  liquidity  risk  and  credit  risk,  refer  to  Note  21  in  the  Company’s 
consolidated  financial  statements.  For  a  discussion  of  the  methods  used  to  value  financial 
instruments,  as  well  as  any  significant  assumptions,  refer  also  to  Note  21  of  the  Company’s 
consolidated financial statements. 

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA 

As  at  the  date  of  this  MD&A,  the  Company  had  376,899,415  common  shares  outstanding  and 
4,208,334  stock  options  outstanding  under  its  stock-based  incentive  plan.  As  at  the  same  date,  the 
Company had no stock purchase warrants outstanding. 

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 

Sale of Mothae plant 

In  December  2013,  the  Company  signed  a  memorandum  of  understanding  (“MOU”)  with  Paragon 
Diamonds Ltd. (“Paragon”) for the sale of certain kimberlite processing plant and diamond recovery 
assets. Under the terms of the MOU, the Company will receive consideration of: 

•  $0.1  million  cash  and  4,434,589  common  shares  of  Paragon  on  signing  of  the  asset 

purchase agreement 

•  $0.2  million  cash  and  5,543,236  common  shares  of  Paragon  on  commencement  of 
relocation  of  the  assets  from  the  Mothae  site.  The  number  of  common  shares  will  be 
adjusted should an equity raise be completed by Paragon at a price less than £0.04.  

The signing of the asset purchase agreement is anticipated by the end of February 2014. 

As part of the MOU, the Company received a non-refundable deposit of US$50,000 from Paragon in 
December 2013. 

Litigation 

Upon completion of the African Diamonds PLc (“AFD”) Arrangement Agreement which resulted in 
the  Company  holding  an  undivided  100%  ownership  interest  in  the  Karowe  Mine,  the  Company 
retained  certain  liabilities  related  to  legal  proceedings  initiated  by  two  former  directors  of  AFD 
against  AFD  alleging  entitlement  to  a  3%  NSR  on  production  from  the  Karowe  Mine.  The  claim 
was  heard  in  the  Botswana  High  Court  in  early  June  2011.  The  High  Court  delivered  its  ruling  in 
August 2011 dismissing the claims against AFD, with costs awarded against the plaintiffs. 

In September 2011, the Company was notified that the plaintiffs, in the legal proceedings initiated 
against  AFD,  had  filed  an  appeal  of  the  decision  of  the  High  Court  of  Botswana  dismissing  the 
plaintiff’s claims with costs awarded in favor of AFD. The appeal was heard in the Appeal Court of 
Botswana in January 2014 and judgment was handed down in February 2014.  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Court of Appeals, the highest court in Botswana upheld the previous ruling by the Botswana High 
Court, dismissing the claim against African Diamonds, with costs awarded against the plaintiffs.  The 
decision is final and there is no further recourse against African Diamonds. 

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 

The  operations  of  the  Company  are  speculative  due  to  the  high  risk  nature  of  its  business  which 
includes  acquisition,  financing,  exploration,  development  and  operation  of  diamond  properties. 
Material  risk  factors  and  uncertainties,  which  should  be  taken  into  account  in  assessing  the 
Company’s activities, include, but are not necessarily limited to, those set below. Any one or more of 
these risks and others could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

Diamond Prices and Marketability 

The mining industry, in general, is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, a profitable 
market will exist for the sale of diamonds produced.  The value of the Company’s shares, its financial 
results and its mining activities are significantly affected by the price and marketability of diamonds. 
Numerous factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the price and marketability of any 
diamonds  produced  which  cannot  be  accurately  predicted,  such  as  international  economic  and 
political  trends,  global  or  regional  consumption  and  demand  and  supply  patterns,  increased 
production  of  other  diamond  producers,  especially  due  to  the  small  concentration  of  producers  and 
sellers within the market.  There is no assurance that the sale price of diamonds produced from any 
diamond deposit will be such that they can be mined at a profit. 

Economic Conditions 

financial  ability.  
Unfavourable  economic  conditions  may  negatively 
Unfavourable  economic  conditions  could  also  increase  the  Company’s  financing  costs,  decrease 
estimated income from prospective mining operations, limit access to capital markets and negatively 
impact the availability of credit facilities to the Company. 

impact  the  Company’s 

Uncertainties Related to Mineral Resource Estimates 

There  is  a  high  degree  of  uncertainty  attributable  to  the  calculation  of  mineral  resources  and 
corresponding  grades  being  mined  or  dedicated  to  future  production.    Until  resources  are  actually 
mined  and  processed,  no  assurance  can  be  given  to  the  actual  quantity  of  mineral  resources  and 
grades.    Any  material  change  in  the  quantity  of  resources,  grades  or  stripping  ratio  may  affect  the 
economic viability of the Company’s properties.  In addition, there is no assurance that recoveries in 
small-scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger-scale tests under on-site conditions, or during 
production.    Determining  the  economic  viability  of  a  diamond  project  is  complicated  and  involves  a 
number of variables.  It involves extensive geo-statistical analysis due to the highly variable nature of 
diamond distribution in Kimberlite pipes and the fact that both diamond grade and average diamond 
value  play  important  roles  in  determining  the  viability  of  any  given  diamond  project.    Since  no  two 
diamonds  are  exactly  alike,  a  significant  parcel  of  diamonds  is  needed  to  gain  confidence  levels  on 
diamond  size  distribution  and  average  diamond  value  necessary  to  make  any  realistic  decisions 
regarding future development. 

Licenses, permits and approvals 

The  Company’s  operations  require  licenses,  permits  and  approvals  from  various  governmental 
authorities.  The  Company  believes  that  it  currently  holds  and  is  presently  complying  in  all  material 
respects with all necessary licenses and permits under applicable laws and regulations to conduct its 
current  operations.  However,  such  licenses  and  permits  are  subject  to  change  in  various 
circumstances  and  certain  permits  and  approvals  are  required  to  be  renewed  from  time  to  time. 
Additional  permits  or  permit  renewals  will  need  to  be  obtained  in  the  future.  The  granting,  renewal 
and continued effectiveness of these permits and approvals are, in most cases, subject to some level 
of  discretion  by  the  applicable  regulatory  authority.  Certain  governmental  approval  and  permitting 
processes  are  subject  to  public  comment  and  can  be  appealed  by  project  opponents,  which  may 
result in significant delays or in approvals being withheld or withdrawn.  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
There can be no guarantee the Company will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and 
permits as are required to explore and develop its properties, commence construction or operation of 
mining facilities and properties under exploration or development or to maintain continued operations 
that economically justify the cost.  

Currency Risk 

Currency  fluctuations  may  impact  the  Company’s  financial  performance.    Diamonds  are  sold  in  US 
dollar with a majority of the Company’s costs and expenses being incurred in Botswana Pula, South 
African  Rand,  Lesotho  Loti,  Canadian  and  U.S.  dollar  currencies.    As  a  consequence,  fluctuations  in 
exchange rates may have a significant effect on the cash flows and operating results of the Company 
in  either  a  positive  or  negative  direction.    In  order  to  mitigate  foreign  exchange  fluctuations  the 
Company has hedged a proportion of its Botswana pula costs for the 2014 financial year. 

Mining and Processing 

The Company’s business operations are subject to risks and hazards inherent in the mining industry, 
including, but not limited to, unanticipated variations in grade and other geological problems, water, 
power,  surface  conditions,  metallurgical  and  other  processing  problems,  mechanical  equipment 
performance  problems,  the  lack  of  availability  of  materials  and  equipment,  the  occurrence  of 
accidents,  labour  force  disruptions,  force  majeure  factors,  weather  conditions,  which  can  materially 
and  adversely  affect  among  other  things  production  quantities  and  rates,  development,  costs  and 
expenditures and production commencement dates. 

The Company periodically reviews its Life of Mine (“LOM”) planning.  Significant changes in the LOM 
plans can occur as a result of experience obtained in the course of carrying out its mining activities, 
changes  in  mining  methods  and  rates,  process  changes,  investments  in  new  equipment  and 
technology,  diamond  price  assumptions  and  other  factors.    Based  on  this  analysis,  the  Company 
reviews its accounting estimates and in the event of an impairment may be required to write down 
the carrying value of its mine or development property.  This process continues for the economic life 
of the mines in which the Company has an interest. 

Environmental and Other Regulatory Requirements 

All  phases  of  mining  and  exploration  operations  are  subject  to  government  regulation  including 
regulations  pertaining  to  environmental  protection.  Environmental  legislation  is  becoming  stricter, 
with increased fines and penalties for non‐compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of 
proposed  projects  and  heightened  responsibility  for  companies  and  their  officers,  directors  and 
employees. There can be no assurance that possible future charges in environmental regulation will 
not  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  operations.  As  well,  environmental  hazards  may  exist  on  a 
property in which the Company holds an interest which were caused by previous or existing owners 
or operators of the properties and of which the Company is not aware at present. Operations at the 
Company’s  mines  are  subject  to  strict  environmental  and  other  regulatory  requirements,  including 
requirements  relating  to  the  production,  handling  and  disposal  of  hazardous  materials,  pollution 
controls and health and safety. Any failure to comply with the requirements could result in substantial 
fines, delays in production, or the withdrawal of the Company’s mining licenses. 

Foreign Operations Risk 

The  Company’s  current  significant  projects  are  located  in  Botswana  and  Lesotho.   Each  of  these 
countries exposes the Company to risks that may not otherwise be experienced if its operations were 
domestic.   The  risks  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  environmental  protection,  land  use,  water  use, 
health safety, labor, restrictions on production, price controls, currency remittance, and maintenance 
of  mineral  tenure  and  expropriation  of  property.   For  example,  changes  to  regulations  in  Botswana 
and  Lesotho  relating  to  royalties,  allowable  production,  importing  and  exporting  of  diamonds  and 
environmental protection, may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on investment 
capital. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Although the operating environments in Botswana and Lesotho are considered favorable compared to 
those  in  other  developing  countries,  there  are  still  political  risks.   These  risks  include,  but  are  not 
limited  to  terrorism,  hostage  taking,  military  repression,  expropriation,  extreme  fluctuations  in 
currency exchange rates, high rates of inflation and labour unrest. Changes in mining or investment 
policies  or  shifts  in  political  attitudes  in  these  countries  may  also  adversely  affect  the  Company’s 
business.  In  addition,  there  may  be  greater  exposure  to  a  risk  of  corruption  and  bribery  (including 
possible prosecution under the federal Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act). Also, in the event of 
a  dispute  arising  in  foreign  operations,  the  Company  may  be  subject  to  the  exclusive  jurisdiction  of 
foreign courts and may be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights. There is no assurance that 
future  changes  in  taxes  in  any  of  the  countries  in  which  the  Company  operates  will  not  adversely 
affect the Company’s operations. 

Mineral Exploration and Development 

The  business  of  exploring  for  diamonds  and  mining  is  highly  speculative  in  nature  and  involves 
significant financial and other risks which even careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not 
eliminate.  There is no certainty that expenditures made or to be made by the Company in exploring 
and  developing  diamond  properties  in  which  it  has  an  interest  will  result  in  the  discovery  of 
commercially  mineable  deposits.    Most  exploration  projects  do  not  result  in  the  discovery  of 
commercially  mineable  deposits.    While  discovery  of  a  diamond  bearing  deposit  may  result  in 
substantial  rewards,  few  properties,  which  are  explored  are  ultimately  developed  into  producing 
mines.  Major expenses may be required to establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and 
processing  facilities  at  a  site.    There  can  be  no  guarantee  that  exploration  programs  carried  out  by 
the Company will result in the development of profitable mining operations. 

Title Matters 

Any  changes  in  the  laws  of  Botswana  or  Lesotho  relating  to  mining  could  have  a  material  adverse 
effect to the rights and title to the interests held in those countries by the Company.  No assurance 
can  be  given  that  applicable  governments  will  not  revoke  or  significantly  alter  the  conditions  of 
applicable exploration and mining authorizations nor that such exploration and mining authorizations 
will not be challenged or impugned by third parties. 

Infrastructure 

The Karowe Mine and the Mothae Project are located in remote areas and the availability of adequate 
infrastructure is critical.  Reliable roads, bridges, power and water supply are important determinants, 
which  affect  capital  and  operating  costs.    Sabotage,  government  or  other  interference  in  the 
maintenance of provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect activities and profitability of the 
Company. 

Rehabilitation Funds and Mine Closure Costs  
Changes  in  environmental  laws  and  regulations  can  create  uncertainty  with  regards  to  future 
rehabilitation  costs  and  affect  the  funding  requirements.  Closing  a  mine  can  have  significant  impact 
on  local  communities  and  site  remediation  activities  may  not  be  supported  by  local  stakeholders. 
Actual  costs  realized  in  satisfaction  of  mine  closure  obligations  may  vary  materially  from 
management’s estimates. 

Community Relations  

The  Company’s  relationships  with  the  communities  in  which  it  operates  and  other  stakeholders  are 
critical to ensure the future success of its existing operations and the construction and development 
of  its  projects.    There  is  an  increasing  level  of  public  concern  relating  to  the  perceived  effect  of 
mining  activities  on  the  environment  and  on  communities  impacted  by  such  activities.  Publicity 
adverse to the Company’s operations, or the mining industry generally, could have an adverse effect 
on the Company and may impact relationships with the communities in which the Company operates 
and  other  stakeholders.  While  the  Company  is  committed  to  operating  in  a  socially  responsible 
manner, there can be no assurance that its efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential risk. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Uninsured Risks and Insurance Coverage 

The mining business is subject to a number of risks and hazards that may not be insured including, 
but not limited to, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labour disputes, encountering unusual 
or unexpected geologic formations or other geological or grade problems, encountering unanticipated 
ground or water conditions, cave-ins, pit wall failures, flooding, rock bursts, periodic interruptions due 
to  inclement  or  hazardous  weather  conditions  and  other  acts  of  God.    Such  risks  could  result  in 
damage to mineral properties or facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in 
exploration, development or mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. 

The  Company  maintains  insurance  against  certain  risks  that  are  associated  with  its  business  in 
amounts  that  it  believes  to  be  reasonable  at  the  current  stage  of  operations.    There  can  be  no 
assurance that such insurance will continue to be available at economically acceptable premiums or 
will be adequate to cover any future claim. 

Competition 

The mining industry is intensely competitive in all its phases and the Company competes with other 
companies that have greater financial resources and technical capacity.  Competition could adversely 
affect the Company’s ability to acquire prospective properties in the future. 

Current and Future Legal Proceedings 

Due  to  the  nature  of  its  business,  the  Company  may  be  subject  to  numerous  regulatory 
investigations,  claims,  lawsuits  and  other  proceedings  in  the  ordinary  course  of  its  business.    The 
results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicated with certainty due to the uncertainty inherent 
in litigation, including the effects of discovery of new evidence or advancement of new legal theories, 
the  difficulty  of  predicting  decisions  of  judges  and  juries  and  the  possibility  that  decisions  may  be 
reversed on appeal.  There can be no assurance that these matters will not have a material adverse 
effect on the Company’s business.  

Conflicts of Interest 

The  Company’s  directors  and  officers  may  serve  as  directors  or  officers,  or  may  be  associated  with 
other  public  companies  or  have  significant  shareholdings  in  other  public  companies.    To  the  extent 
that such other companies may participate in business or asset acquisitions, dispositions, or ventures 
in which the Company may participate, the directors and officers of the Company may have a conflict 
of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the transactions. 

If  a  conflict  of  interest  arises,  the  Company  will  rely  on  its  code  of  ethics  policy  and  applicable 
corporate legislation to which all directors and officers are subject. These provisions state that where 
a director has such a conflict, that director must, at a meeting of the company’s directors, disclose his 
interest and refrain from voting.  In accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the 
directors  and  officers  of  the  Company  are  required  to  act  honestly,  in  good  faith  and  in  the  best 
interests of the Company. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key Personnel 

The Company is depending on a relatively small number of key employees, the loss of any of whom 
could have an adverse effect on the Company. The Company does not have key person insurance on 
these individuals. 

Share Price Volatility and Future Sales by Existing Shareholders 
In recent years, the securities markets have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, 
and  the  market  price  of  securities  of  many  companies,  particularly  those  considered  to  be 
development  stage  companies  or  early  stage  production  companies  without  a  proven  history  of 
sustainable cash flow, have experienced wide fluctuations which have not necessarily been related to 
the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no 
assurance that such fluctuations will not affect the price of the Company’s securities. Also, subject to 
compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company’s officers, directors, significant shareholders 
may  sell  some  or  all  of  their  common  shares  in  the  future.  No  prediction  can  be  made  as  to  the 
effect,  if  any,  such  future  sales  of  common  shares  will  have  on  the  market  price  of  the  Company’s 
securities.  The  future  sale  of  a  substantial  number  of  common  shares  by  the  Company’s  officers, 
directors,  principal  shareholders  and  their  affiliates,  or  the  perception  that  such  sales  could  occur, 
could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Company’s securities. 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS 

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements. 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

The  report  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2014  is  expected  to  be  published  on  or  about  May  8, 
2014.  In  addition,  the  Company’s  annual  general  meeting  of  shareholders  will  be  held  on  May  14, 
2014 in Vancouver, British Columbia. 

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

The  Company  prepared  its  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  International  Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). 
Note  3  of  the  audited  consolidated  financial  statements  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013 
provides  details  of  significant  accounting  policies  and  accounting  policy  decisions  for  significant  or 
potentially  significant  areas  that  have  had  an  impact  on  our  financial  statements  or  may  have  an 
impact in future periods. 

As  of  January  1,  2013,  the  Company  adopted  the  new  and  amended  IFRS  pronouncements  in 
accordance with the transitional provisions outlined in the respective standards as listed below. 

a)  Pronouncement affecting financial statement presentation or disclosures 

i)  IFRS 12, Disclosure of interests in other entities  

The  Company  adopted  IFRS  12  on  January  1,  2013.  IFRS  12  establishes  disclosure 
requirements  for  interests  in  other  entities,  such  as  subsidiaries,  joint  arrangements, 
associates,  and  unconsolidated  structured  entities.  Refer  to  Note  13  of  the  audited 
consolidated  financial  statements  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013  for  disclosures 
with regards to the Company’s subsidiaries. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ii)  IFRS 13, Fair value measurement 

The  Company  adopted  IFRS  13  with  prospective  application  from  January  1,  2013.  IFRS 
13 is a comprehensive standard for fair value measurement and disclosure for use across 
all  IFRS  standards.  The  new  standard  clarifies  that  fair  value  is  the  price  that  would  be 
received  to  sell  an  asset,  or  paid  to  transfer  a  liability  in  an  orderly  transaction  between 
market participants, at the measurement date. 

The  adoption  of  IFRS  13  did  not  have  an  effect  on  the  Company’s  consolidated  financial 
statements. 

iii) Amendment to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements  

The Company adopted the amendments to IAS 1 on January 1, 2013, with restrospective 
application.  The  amendments  to  IAS  1  require  items  to  be  grouped  within  other 
comprehensive income that may be reclassified to profit or loss and those that will not be 
reclassified. 

The  adoption  of  the  IAS  1  amendments  did  not  have  an  effect  on  the  Company’s 
consolidated financial statements for the current period or prior period. 

b)  Pronouncements affecting accounting policies only 

i)  IFRS 10, Consolidated financial statements 

The Company adopted IFRS 10 on January 1, 2013 with retrospective application. IFRS 10 
requires  an  entity  to  consolidate  an  investee  when  it  has  power  over  the  investee,  is 
exposed, or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has 
the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. IFRS 10 supercedes 
IAS  27,  Consolidated  and  Separate  Financial  Statements  and  SIC  12,  Consolidation  – 
Special Purpose Entities. 

The  Company  has  concluded  that  IFRS  10  did  not  have  an  effect  on  the  consolidated 
financial statements for the current year or prior years presented as the adoption did not 
result in the consolidation status of any of the subsidiaries. 

ii)  IFRS 11, Joint arrangements 

The Company adopted IFRS 11 on January 1, 2013 with retrospective application. IFRS 11 
requires a venturer to classify its interest in a joint agreement as a joint venture or joint 
operation.  Joint  ventures  will  be  accounted  for  using  the  equity  method  of  accounting 
whereas for a joint operation the venturer will recognize its share of the assets, liabilities, 
revenue and expenses of the joint operation. 

The  Company  has  concluded  that  IFRS  11  did  not  have  an  effect  on  the  consolidated 
financial  statements  for  the  current  year  or  prior  years  presented  as  the  Company  does 
not have any joint arrangements. 

iii) IFRIC 20, Stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine 

The  Company  adopted  IFRIC  20  and  applied  the  requirements  to  production  stripping 
costs incurred on or after January 1, 2012, in accordance with the transitional provisions. 
The predecessor stripping assets recorded as of January 1, 2012, the date of the earliest 
period presented, have been reviewed in accordance with IFRIC 20. IFRIC 20 sets out the 
accounting  for  overburden  waste  removal  (stripping)  costs  in  the  production  phase  of  a 
mine.  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  Company  has  identified  components  of  ore  bodies  to  be  phases,  pits  or  sub-pits 
depending on the ore body being analyzed. These components align with the view of the 
mine and the plan of mining activities. Previously, the Company recorded stripping activity 
relating  to  major  expansions  only.  Under  IFRIC  20,  the  Company  recognizes  stripping 
activity assets when the following three criteria are met: 

• 

• 

• 

It  is  probable  that  the  future  economic  benefit  (improved  access  to  the  ore  body) 
associated with the stripping activity will flow to the entity; 
The  entity  can  identify  the  component  of  the  ore  body  for  which  access  has  been 
improved; and 
The  costs  relating  to  the  stripping  activity  associated  with  that  component  can  be 
measured reliably. 

Stripping activity assets capitalized under IFRIC 20 are classified within mineral properties, 
which is consistent with the classification of the asset these costs relate to. 

These assets are amortized on a units-of-production basis over the remaining proven and 
probable reserves of the respective components. 

The Company completed an analysis of IFRIC 20 and did not require any adjustments to 
the consolidated financial statements. 

c)  Pronouncements issued but not yet effective 

In July 2013, the IASB tentatively decided to defer the mandatory effective date of IFRS 9. 
The  IASB  agreed  that  the  mandatory  effective  date  should  no  longer  be  annual  periods 
beginning on or after January 1, 2015 but rather left open pending the finalization of the 
impairment and classification and measurement requirements. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS 

The  application  of  certain  accounting  policies  requires  the  Company  to  make  estimates  that  affect 
both  the  amount  and  timing  of  the  recording  of  assets,  liabilities,  revenues  and  expenses.  Some  of 
these estimates require judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. 

Note  3  to  the  audited  consolidated  financial  statements  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013 
includes  a  summary  of  the  significant  accounting  policies  adopted  by  the  Company.  The  following 
policies  are  considered  to  be  critical  accounting  policies  since  they  involve  the  use  of  significant 
estimates. 

Depreciation, depletion and accretion 

Mineral  properties  and  plant  and  equipment  comprise  a  large  component  of  the  Company’s  assets 
and  as  such,  depreciation  and  depletion  of  these  assets  have  a  significant  effect  on  the  Company’s 
financial  statements.  Upon  commencement  of  commercial  production,  the  Company  amortizes 
mineral  property  and  mining  equipment  and  other  assets  over  the  life  of  the  mine  based  on  the 
depletion  of  the  mine’s  proven  and  probable  reserves.  In  the  case  of  mining  equipment  and  other 
assets, if the useful life of the asset is shorter than the life of the mine, the asset is amortized over its 
expected useful life. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proven  and  probable  reserves  are  determined  based  on  a  professional  evaluation  using  accepted 
international  standards  for  the  assessment  of  mineral  reserves.  The  assessment  involves  geological 
and  geophysical  studies  and  economic  data  and  the  reliance  on  a  number  of  assumptions.  The 
estimates of the reserves may change based on additional knowledge gained subsequent to the initial 
assessment. This may include additional data available from continuing exploration, results from the 
reconciliation of actual mining production data against the original reserve estimates, or the impact of 
economic  factors  such  as  changes  in  the  price  of  commodities  or  the  cost  of  components  of 
production.  

A change in the original estimate of reserves would result in a change in the rate of depreciation and 
amortization of the related mining assets and could result in an impairment of the mining assets. 

Mineral properties 

The  Company  carries  the  acquisition  costs  of  its  mineral  properties  at  cost  less  any  provision  for 
impairment. The costs of each property will be amortized over the economic life of the property on a 
unit  of  production  basis.  Costs  are  charged  to  operations  when  a  property  is  abandoned  or  when 
impairment  in  value,  other  than  temporary,  has  been  determined.  Exploration  costs  are  charged  to 
operations as incurred. 

The Company undertakes a periodic review of the carrying values of mineral properties and whenever 
events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may exceed their fair value. In 
undertaking  this  review,  management  of  the  Company  is  required  to  make  significant  estimates. 
These  estimates  are  subject  to  various  risks  and  uncertainties,  which  may  ultimately  have  an  effect 
on  the  expected  recoverability  of  the  carrying  values  of  the  mineral  properties  and  related 
expenditures. 

Income taxes 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial 
statement carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases (“temporary 
difference”), and losses carried forward. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using 
tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on 
the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by year end. The effect on deferred income 
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is included in operations in the period in which the 
change is substantively enacted. The amount of deferred income tax assets recognized is limited to 
the  extent  that  it  is  probable  that  future  tax  profits  will  be  available  against  which  the  temporary 
difference can be utilized. 

Management  of  the  Company  is  required  to  exercise  judgments  and  make  assumptions  about  the 
future performance of the Company in determining its ability to utilize loss carry-forwards and realize 
the benefits of deferred income tax assets. 

Stock-based compensation 

In  calculating  the  fair  value  of  stock  options  granted,  management  is  required  to  make  significant 
estimates  in  relation  to  the  future  volatility  of  the  Company’s  share  price  and  the  period  in  which 
stock options will be exercised. Selection of a volatility factor and the estimate of the expected option 
life  will  have  a  significant  impact  on  costs  recognized  for  stock-based  compensation.  Estimates 
concerning  volatility  are  made  with  reference  to  historical  volatility,  which  is  not  necessarily  an 
accurate indicator of volatility that will be experienced in the future. Management assumes that stock 
options will be exercised prior to their expiry date. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Decommissioning and site restoration 

The  Company  has  obligations  for  site  restoration  and  decommissioning  related  to  its  diamond 
properties. The future obligations for decommissioning and site restoration activities are estimated by 
the  Company  using  mine  closure  plans  or  other  similar  studies  which  outline  the  requirements  that 
will  be  carried  out  to  meet  the  obligations.  Because  the  obligations  are  dependent  on  the  laws  and 
regulations of the countries in which the mines operate, the requirements could change as a result of 
amendments  in  the  laws  and  regulations  relating  to  environmental  protection  and  other  legislation 
affecting  resource  companies.  As  the  estimate  of  obligations  is  based  on  future  expectations,  a 
number  of  assumptions  and  judgments  are  made  by  management  in  the  determination  of  closure 
provisions.  The  decommissioning  and  site  restoration  provisions  are  more  uncertain  the  further  into 
the future the mine closure activities are to be carried out.  

The  Company’s  policy  for  recording  decommissioning  and  site  restoration  provisions  is  to  establish 
provisions  for  future  mine  closure  costs  at  the  commencement  of  mining  operations  based  on  the 
present value of the future cash flows required to satisfy the obligations. The amount of the present 
value of the provision is added to the cost of the related mining assets and depreciated over the life 
of the mine. The provision is accreted to its future value over the life of the mine through a charge to 
operating  costs.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  estimates  made  by  management  during  the 
preparation of these consolidated financial statements and those differences may be material. 

INTERNAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS 

Disclosure  controls  and  procedures  are  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  information 
required to be disclosed by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or 
submitted  by  it  under  securities  legislation  is  recorded,  processed,  summarized  and  reported  within 
the time periods specified in the securities legislation and include controls and procedures designed to 
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings 
or  other  reports  filed  or  submitted  under  securities  legislation  is  accumulated  and  communicated  to 
the  Company’s  management,  including  its  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer,  as 
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the 
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. As of 
December  31,  2013,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer  have  each  concluded 
that  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  as  defined  in  NI  52-109  -  Certification  of 
Disclosure in Issuer’s Annual and Interim Filings, are effective to achieve the purpose for which they 
have been designed.  

Internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS. 
Management  is  also  responsible  for  the  design  of  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial 
reporting in order to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and 
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.  

The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting include policies and procedures that: pertain 
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions 
and disposition of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary 
to  permit  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  IFRS  and  that  receipts  and 
expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of 
the  Company;  and  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  prevention  or  timely  detection  of 
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial 
statements.  

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Because  of  their  inherent  limitations,  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  can  provide  only 
reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Furthermore, projections of any 
evaluation  of  effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become 
inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of  compliance  with  the  policies  or 
procedures may deteriorate. 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS 

Certain  of  the  statements  made  and  contained  herein  in  the  MD&A  and  elsewhere  constitute 
forward-looking  statements  as  defined  in  applicable  securities  laws.  Generally,  these  forward-
looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expects”, 
“anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “potential”, “possible” and similar expressions, or 
statements  that  events,  conditions  or  results  “will”,  “may”,  “could”  or  “should”  occur  or  be 
achieved.  

In particular, this MD&A may contain forward looking information pertaining to the following: the 
estimates  of  the  Company’s  mineral  reserve  and  resources;  estimates  of  the  Company’s 
production and sales volumes for the Karowe Mine; estimated costs to construct the Karowe Mine; 
start-up,  exploration  and  development  plans  and  objectives;  production  costs;  exploration  and 
development  expenditures  and  reclamation  costs;  expectation  of  diamond  price  and  changes  to 
foreign  currency  exchange  rates;  expectations  regarding  the  need  to  raise  capital;  possible 
impacts  of  disputes  or  litigation;  and  other  risks  and  uncertainties  described  under  the  heading 
“Risks  and  Uncertainties”  in  the  Company’s  Annual  Information  Form  dated  March  27,  2013 
available at http://www.sedar.com (the “AIF”). 

Forward-looking  statements  are  based  on  the  opinions,  assumptions  and  estimates  of 
management  as  of  the  date  such  statements  are  made,  and  they  are  subject  to  a  number  of 
known  and  unknown  risks,  uncertainties  and  other  factors  which  may  cause  the  actual  results, 
performance  or  achievements  of  the  Company  to  be  materially  different  from  any  future  results, 
performance  or  achievement  expressed  or  implied  by  such  forward-looking  statements.  Such 
assumptions  include:  the  Company’s  ability  to  obtain  necessary  financing;  the  Company’s 
expectations  regarding  the  economy  generally,  results  of  operations  and  the  extent  of  future 
growth  and  performance;  and  assumptions  that  the  Company’s  activities  will  not  be  adversely 
disrupted  or  impeded  by  development,  operating  or  regulatory  risk.  The  Company  believes  that 
expectations reflected in this forward-looking information are reasonable but no assurance can be 
given  that  these  expectations  will  prove  to  be  correct  and  such  forward-looking  information 
included in this MD&A should not be unduly relied upon.  

There  can  be  no  assurance  that  such  statements  will  prove  to  be  accurate,  as  the  Company’s 
results  and  future  events  could  differ  materially  from  those  anticipated  in  this  forward-looking 
information  as  a  result  of  those  factors  discussed  in  or  referred  to  under  the  heading  “Risks  and 
Uncertainties”  in  the  Company’s  AIF,  as  well  as  changes  in  general  business  and  economic 
conditions, changes in interest and foreign currency rates, the supply and demand for, deliveries 
of  and  the  level  and  volatility  of  prices  of  rough  diamonds,  costs  of  power  and  diesel,  acts  of 
foreign  governments  and  the  outcome  of  legal  proceedings,  inaccurate  geological  and 
recoverability assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral 
reserves  and  resources),  unanticipated  operational  difficulties  (including  failure  of  plant, 
equipment  or  processes  to  operate  in  accordance  with  specifications  or  expectations,  cost 
escalations, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt 
of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job actions, adverse weather conditions, 
and unanticipated events relating to health safety and environmental matters) 

Accordingly,  readers  are  cautioned  not  to  place  undue  reliance  on  these  forward-looking 
statements  which  speak  only  as  of  the  date  the  statements  were  made,  and  the  Company  does 
not  assume  any  obligations  to  update  or  revise  them  to  reflect  new  events  or  circumstances, 
except as required by law. 

	
  
 
	
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
February 20, 2014

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the Shareholders of Lucara Diamond Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Lucara Diamond Corp., which
comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and changes in equity for
the years then ended, and the related notes, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies
and other explanatory information.

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control
as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements
that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those
standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material
misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment,
including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control
relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order
to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Lucara Diamond Corp. as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and its financial
performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards.

signed “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”

Chartered Accountants

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Place, 250 Howe Street, Suite 700, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3S7
T: +1 604 806 7000, F: +1 604 806 7806, www.pwc.com/ca

“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership.

LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

December 31, 
2013 

December 31, 
2012 

ASSETS 
Current assets 

Cash (Note 21) 
Investments (Note 21) 
Trade receivables and other (Note 5) 
Inventories (Note 6) 

Plant and equipment (Note 7) 
Mineral properties (Note 8) 
Other non-current assets 

TOTAL ASSETS 

LIABILITIES 
Current liabilities 

Trade payables and accrued liabilities (Note 21) 
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 9) 

Long-term debt (Note 9) 
Restoration provisions (Note 10) 
Future income taxes (Note 17) 

TOTAL LIABILITIES 

EQUITY  

Share capital (Note 11) 
Contributed surplus (Note 12) 
Cumulative deficit 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 

Total equity attributable to shareholders of the Company 

Non-controlling interests (Note 13) 

TOTAL EQUITY 

$ 

49,364  $ 
90 
3,593 
21,132 

74,179 

100,886 
72,061 
62 

$ 

247,188  $ 

$ 

15,491  $ 

- 

15,491 

- 
14,515 
14,258 

44,264 

283,609 
5,108 
(45,516) 
(41,820) 

201,381 

1,543 

202,924 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 

$ 

247,188  $ 

Commitments (Note 23) and subsequent events (Note 24) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

Approved on Behalf of the Board of Directors: 

“Paul K. Conibear” 
Director  

“William Lamb” 
Director 

13,261 
86 
5,527 
13,300 

32,174 

118,395 
84,645 
137 

235,351 

14,695 
30,311 

45,006 

20,643 
12,242 
- 

77,891 

282,796 
4,874 
(110,740) 
(21,381) 

155,549 

1,911 

157,460 

235,351 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

Revenues  

$ 

180,507  $    

41,830 

2013 

2012 

Cost of goods sold 

Operating expenses 
Royalty expenses (Note 8) 
Depletion, amortization and accretion 

43,835 
18,051 
14,979 

76,865 

13,992 
4,183 
5,898 

24,073 

Income from mining operations 

103,642 

17,757 

Other expenses 

Exploration and other mine costs (Note 14) 
Administration (Note 15) 
Gain on sale of exploration program diamonds (Note 16) 
Sales and marketing 
Finance expenses 
Foreign exchange loss (gain) 

1,323 
11,429 
(584) 
3,523 
3,785 
3,953 

23,429 

12,854 
9,534 
- 
1,481 
3,103 
(1,690) 

25,282 

Net income (loss) before tax 

80,213 

(7,525) 

Income tax expense (Note 17) 

Current income tax  
Future income tax  

Net income (loss) for the year 

Attributable to: 

Shareholders of the Company 
Non-controlling interests 

Income (loss) per common share (Note 18) 

Basic 
Diluted 

Weighted average common shares outstanding (Note 18) 

Basic 
Diluted 

$ 

$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 

96 
14,895 

14,991 

- 
- 

- 

65,222  $ 

(7,525) 

65,317  $ 
(95)  $ 

(5,911) 
(1,614) 

0.17  $   
0.17  $   

(0.02) 
(0.02) 

376,392,625 
376,512,990 

374,621,554 
374,621,554 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

2013 

2012 

Net income (loss) for the year 

$ 

65,222  $ 

(7,525) 

Other comprehensive loss 
      Change in fair value of available-for-sale securities 
      Currency translation adjustment 

11 
(20,816)  
(20,805) 

(26) 
(8,246) 
(8,272) 

Comprehensive income (loss) 

$ 

44,417  $ 

(15,797) 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to: 
      Shareholders of the Company 
      Non-controlling interests 

44,878 
(461) 

(14,092) 
(1,705) 

$ 

44,417  $ 

(15,797) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

Cash flows from (used in): 
Operating Activities 
Net income (loss) for the year 
Items not involving cash: 

Depletion, amortization, accretion and depreciation 
Foreign exchange gain 
Stock-based compensation  
Deferred income taxes 
Finance costs 

Net changes in working capital items: 

VAT receivables and other current assets 
Inventories 
Trade payables and other current liabilities 

Financing Activities 

Repayments of debenture 
Drawdown of revolving credit facility 
Repayments of revolving credit facility 
Finance costs paid 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 

Investing Activities 

Acquisition of plant and equipment 
Other 

2013 

2012 

$ 

65,222  $ 

(7,525) 

15,402 
- 
517 
14,895 
3,527 
99,563 

2,060 
(6,953) 
3,893 

98,563 

(50,000) 
- 
(4,500) 
- 
530 
(53,970) 

(7,865) 
54 
(7,811) 

(679) 
36,103 
13,261 
49,364  $ 

9,306 
(1,037) 
286 
- 
2,779 
3,809 

706 
(10,123) 
8,505 

2,897 

- 
9,500 
(5,000) 
(585) 
2,620 
6,535 

(44,441) 
7 
(44,434) 

(326) 
(35,328) 
48,589 
13,261  

Effect of exchange rate change on cash  
Increase (decrease) in cash during the year 
Cash, beginning of year 
Cash, end of year 

$ 

Supplemental Information 
Interest received (paid) 
Taxes paid 
Changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
related to plant and equipment 

(109) 
96 

311 
- 

(2,870) 

(10,621) 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

Number of 
shares 
issued and 

outstanding  Share capital 

Contributed 
surplus 

Cumulative 
deficit 

Accumulated 
other 
comprehensive 
loss 

Non-
controlling 
interests 

Total 

Balance, January 1, 2012 

372,349,049  $ 

278,995  $ 

5,769  $ 

(104,244)  $ 

(13,200)  $ 

3,031  $ 

170,351 

Exercise of stock options 
Stock-based compensation 
Effect of foreign currency 
translation 
Unrealized loss on investments 
Free-carried non-controlling 
interests (Note 13) 
Net loss for the year 

3,943,700 
- 

3,801 
- 

(1,181) 
286 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

(8,155) 
(26) 

- 
- 

(91) 
- 

(585) 
(5,911) 

- 
- 

585 
(1,614) 

2,620 
286 

(8,246) 
(26) 

- 
(7,525) 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

376,292,749  $ 

282,796  $ 

4,874  $ 

(110,740)  $ 

(21,381)  $ 

1,911  $ 

157,460 

Balance, January 1, 2013 

376,292,749  $ 

282,796  $ 

4,874  $ 

(110,740)  $ 

(21,381)  $ 

1,911  $ 

157,460 

Exercise of stock options 
Stock-based compensation 
Effect of foreign currency 
translation 
Unrealized gain on investments 
Free-carried non-controlling 
interests (Note 13) 
Net income for the year 

606,666 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

813 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

(283) 
517 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

(93) 
65,317 

- 
- 

(20,450) 
11 

- 
- 

- 
- 

(366) 
- 

93 
(95) 

530 
517 

(20,816) 
11 

- 
65,222 

Balance, December 31, 2013 

376,899,415  $ 

283,609  $ 

5,108  $ 

(45,516)   $ 

(41,820)   $ 

1,543  $ 

202,924 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

1.  NATURE OF OPERATIONS 

Lucara Diamond Corp. together with its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) is 
a diamond mining company focused on the development and operation of diamond properties in 
Africa. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Karowe Mine (previously named AK6 Diamond 
Project) located in Botswana and a 75% interest in Mothae Diamond Project located in Lesotho.  

The  Company’s  common  shares  are  listed  on  the  TSX,  NASDAQ  OMX  First  North  and  Botswana 
Stock  Exchanges.  The  Company  was  continued  into  the  Province  of  British  Columbia  under  the 
Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) in August 2004 and its registered office is located at 
Suite 2610 - 1066 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3E8. 

2.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION  

The  Company  prepared  its  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  International  Financial 
Reporting  Standards  (“IFRS”)  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting  Standards  Board 
(“IASB”). The same accounting policies have been consistently applied in all periods presented. 

These  financial  statements  were  approved  by  the  Board  of  Directors  for  issue  on  February  20, 
2014. 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

The  significant  accounting  policies  used  in  the  preparation  of  these  consolidated  financial 
statements are as follows: 

(a)  Basis of measurement 

These  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  under  the  historical  cost  convention, 
except for investments in equity securities, which are measured at fair value. 

(b)  Consolidation 

These  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  the  Company  and  all  of  its 
subsidiaries.  

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. Control is the power to govern the financial and 
operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. Subsidiaries are included in 
the consolidated financial statements from the date control is obtained until the date control ceases. 
Where the Company’s interest is less than 100%, the Company recognized non-controlling interests. 
All  intercompany  balances,  transactions,  income,  expenses,  profits  and  losses,  including  unrealized 
gains  and  losses  have  been  eliminated  on  consolidation.  Accounting  policies  of  subsidiaries  have 
been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

Non-controlling interests represent the equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly and indirectly, 
to  the  Company  and  is  presented  separately  within  equity  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheet, 
separately from equity attributable to the shareholders of the  Company. Losses within a subsidiary 
continue  to  be  attributed  to  the  non-controlling  interests  even  if  that  results  in  a  deficit  balance. 
Changes  in  the  Company’s  ownership  interest  in  subsidiaries  that  do  not  result  in  a  loss  of  control 
are accounted for as equity transactions. 

 (c) Critical accounting estimates and judgments 

The  preparation  of  consolidated  financial  statements  requires  management  to  use  judgment  in 
applying  its  accounting  policies  and  estimates  and  assumptions  about  the  future.  Estimates  and 
other judgments are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other 
factors,  including  expectations  about  future  events  that  are  believed  to  be  reasonable  under  the 
circumstances.  The  following  discusses  the  most  significant  accounting  judgments  and  estimates 
that the Company has made in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements: 

Valuation of mineral properties – The Company carries the acquisition costs of its mineral properties 
at cost less any provision for impairment. The Company undertakes a periodic review of the carrying 
values  of  mineral  properties  and  whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  their 
carrying  values  may  exceed  their  fair  value.  In  undertaking  this  review,  management  of  the 
Company  is  required  to  make  significant  judgments.  These  judgments  are  subject  to  various  risks 
and uncertainties, which may ultimately have an effect on the expected recoverability of the carrying 
values of the mineral properties and related expenditures. 

Utilization of tax losses  –  The  Company  is  subject  to  income  taxes  in  a  number  of  jurisdictions.  At 
present  all  of  the  entities,  except  Boteti  Mining  (PTY)  Ltd.  are  making  tax  losses.  These  tax  losses 
are only recognized to the extent that expected future taxable profits are available.  

Stock based compensation  –  The  fair  value  of  stock  options  is  determined  using  the  Black-Scholes 
option  pricing  model  and  are  expensed  over  their  vesting  periods.  In  estimating  fair  value, 
management of the Company is required to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding the 
life  of  the  options,  volatility  and  forfeitures  rates.  Changes  in  the  assumptions  used  could  result  in 
materially different results. 

Decommissioning and site restoration  –  The  Company  has  obligations  for  site  restoration  and 
decommissioning related to its diamond properties. The future obligations for decommissioning and 
site  restoration  activities  are  estimated  by  the  Company  using  mine  closure  plans  or  other  similar 
studies which outline the requirements that will be carried out to meet the obligations. Because the 
obligations are dependent on the laws and regulations of the countries in which the mines operate, 
the  requirements  could  change  as  a  result  of  amendments  in  the  laws  and  regulations  relating  to 
environmental  protection  and  other  legislation  affecting  resource  companies.  As  the  estimate  of 
obligations is based on future expectations, a number of assumptions and judgments are made by 
management  in  the  determination  of  closure  provisions.  The  decommissioning  and  site  restoration 
provisions are more uncertain the further into the future the mine closure activities are to be carried 
out.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

The  Company’s  policy  for  recording  decommissioning  and  site  restoration  provisions  is  to  establish 
provisions  for  future  mine  closure  costs  at  the  commencement  of  mining  operations  based  on  the 
present value of the future cash flows required to satisfy the obligations. The amount of the present 
value of the provision is added to the cost of the related mining assets and depreciated over the life 
of the mine. The provision is accreted to its future value over the life of the mine through a charge 
to  operating  costs.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  estimates  made  by  management  during  the 
preparation of these consolidated financial statements and those differences may be material. 

 (d)  Segment reporting 

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the 
chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating 
resources  and  assessing  performance  of  the  operating  segments,  has  been  identified  as  the  person 
that  makes  strategic  decisions.  The  CEO  is  deemed  the  chief  operating  decision-maker  of  the 
Company. 

The  Company’s  primary  reporting  segments  are  based  on  individual  diamond  properties,  being  the 
Karowe Mine and the Mothae Diamond Project and Corporate. The Corporate office provides support 
to  the  diamond  properties  with  respect  to  treasury  and  finance,  technical  support,  regulatory 
reporting and corporate administration. 

(e)  Foreign currency translation 

Functional and presentation currency 

Items included in the financial statements of each of the Company’s entities are measured using the 
currency  of  the  primary  economic  environment  in  which  the  entity  operates  (the  “functional 
currency”).  The  consolidated  financial  statements  are  presented  in  U.S.  dollars.  The  functional 
currency of the parent company, Lucara Diamond Corp., is the Canadian dollar.   

Transactions and balances 

Foreign  currency  transactions  are  translated  into  the  functional  currency  using  the  exchange  rates 
prevailing  at  the  dates  of  the  transactions.  Foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses  resulting  from  the 
settlement  of  such  transactions  and  from  the  translation  at  exchange  rates  of  monetary  assets  and 
liabilities  denominated  in  currencies  other  than  an  entity’s  functional  currency  are  recognized  in  the 
statement of operations. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

Group companies 

The  functional  currency  of  the  significant  subsidiaries  of  the  Company  are  Boteti  Mining  (PTY)  Ltd., 
which  has  a  Pula  functional  currency  and  Mothae  Diamonds  (Pty)  Ltd,  which  has  a  Loti  functional 
currency. The results and financial position of the group companies, which have a functional currency 
different from the presentation currency, are translated into the presentation currency as follows: 

(i)  Assets  and  liabilities  for  each  balance  sheet  presented  are  translated  at  the  closing  rate  at  the 

date of that balance sheet 

(ii)  Income and expenses for each statement of operation are translated at average exchange rates 
(unless  this  average  is  not  a  reasonable  approximation  of  the  cumulative  effect  of  the  rates 
prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate 
on the dates of the transactions). 

(iii) All  resulting  exchange  differences  are  recognized  in  other  comprehensive  income as  cumulative 

translation adjustments. 

 (f)  Cash  

Cash  include  cash  on  hand,  deposits  held  at  call  with  banks,  other  short-term  highly  liquid 
investments with original maturities of three months or less.  

(g)  Financial instruments 

Financial assets and liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the contractual 
provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows 
from  the  assets  have  expired  or  have  been  transferred  and  the  Company  has  transferred 
substantially  all  risks  and  rewards  of  ownership.  Financial  liabilities  are  derecognized  when  the 
obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expires. 

At initial recognition, the Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: 

(i)  Financial  assets  and  liabilities  at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss:  A  financial  asset  or  liability  is 
classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the 
short-term. Derivatives are also included in this category unless they are designated as hedges.  

Financial  instruments  in  this  category  are  recognized  initially  and  subsequently  at  fair  value. 
Transaction  costs  are  expensed  in  the  consolidated  statement  of  operations.  Gains  and  losses 
arising  from  changes  in  fair  value  are  presented  in  the  consolidated  statement  of  operations 
within “other gains and losses” in the period in which they arise. Non-derivative financial assets 
and  liabilities  at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss  are  classified  as  current  except  for  the  portion 
expected  to  be  realized  or  paid  beyond  twelve  months  of  the  balance  sheet  date,  which  are 
classified as non-current. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

(ii)  Available-for-sale investments: Available-for-sale investments are non-derivatives that are either 

designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories.  

Available-for-sale investments are recognized initially at fair value plus transaction costs and are 
subsequently carried at fair value. Gains or losses arising from remeasurement are recognized in 
other  comprehensive  income.  When  an  available-for-sale  investment  is  sold  or  impaired,  the 
accumulated  gains  or  losses  are  moved  from  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  to  the 
statement  of  operations  and  are  included  in  “other  gains  and  losses”.  Available-for-sale 
investments are classified as non-current, unless an investment matures within twelve months, or 
management expects to dispose of it within twelve months. 

(iii) Loans  and  receivables:  Loans  and  receivables  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or 
determinable  payments  that  are  not  quoted  in  an  active  market.  The  Company’s  loans  and 
receivables comprise cash and trade receivables and are included in current assets due to their 
short-term  nature.  Loans  and  receivables  are  initially  recognized  at  the  amount  expected  to  be 
received,  less,  when  material,  a  discount  to  reduce  the  loans  and  receivables  to  fair  value. 
Subsequently, loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest 
method less a provision for impairment. 

(iv) Financial liabilities at amortized cost: Financial liabilities at amortized cost include trade payables, 
bank debt and long-term debt. Trade payables are initially recognized at the amount required to 
be paid, less, when material, a discount to reduce the payables to fair value. Subsequently, trade 
payables  are  measured  at  amortized  cost  using  the  effective  interest  method.  Bank  debt  and 
long-term  debt  are  recognized  initially  at  fair  value,  net  of  any  transaction  costs  incurred  and 
subsequently  at  amortized  cost  using  the  effective  interest  method.  These  are  classified  as 
current liabilities if payment is due within twelve months. Otherwise, they are presented as non-
current liabilities. 

Impairment of financial assets 

At  each  reporting  date,  the Company  assesses  whether  there  is  objective  evidence  that  a  financial 
asset (other than a financial asset classified as fair value through profit or loss) is impaired. 

The criteria used to determine if objective evidence of an impairment loss exists include: 

(i)  significant financial difficulty of the obligor; 
(ii) delinquencies in interest or principal payments; and 
(iii) it becomes probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization.  

For equity securities, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost 
is also evidence that the assets are impaired. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

If such evidence exists, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, as follows: 

(i)  Financial assets carried at amortized cost: The loss is the difference between the amortized cost 
of  the  loan  or  receivable  and  the  present  value  of  the  estimated  future  cash  flows,  discounted 
using the instrument’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced 
by this amount either directly or indirectly through the use of an allowance account. 

(ii)  Available-for-sale financial assets: The impairment loss is the difference between the original cost 
of  the  asset  and  its  fair  value  at  the  measurement  date,  less  any  impairment  losses  previously 
recognized in the statement of operations. This amount represents the loss in accumulated other 
comprehensive income that is reclassified to net loss. 

Impairment losses on financial assets carried at amortized cost and available-for-sale debt instruments 
are  reversed  in  subsequent  periods  if  the  amount  of  the  loss  decreases  and  the  decrease  can  be 
related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized. Impairment losses on 
available-for-sale equity instruments are not reversed. 

(h)  Inventories 

Inventories,  which  include  rough  diamonds,  ore  stock  piles  and  consumables,  are  measured  at  the 
lower of cost and net realizable value. The amount of any write-down of inventories to net realizable 
value and all losses, are recognized in the period the write-down of loss occurs. Cost is determined 
using the weighted average method. Cost includes directly attributable mining overhead but excludes 
borrowing costs. 

Net realizable value represents the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less all 
estimated costs to completion and selling expenses. 

(i)  Plant and equipment 

Plant  and  equipment  are  stated  at  cost  less  accumulated  depreciation  and  impairment  losses.  The 
cost of an asset consists of its purchase price, any directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to 
its present working condition and location for its intended use and an initial estimate of the costs of 
dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located. 

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as 
appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow 
to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. 

Depreciation  of  each  asset  is  calculated  using  the  straight  line  or  unit  of  production  method  to 
allocate its cost less its residual value over its estimated useful life. The estimated useful lives of plant 
and equipment are as follows: 

Machinery   
Plant facilities 
Furniture and office equipment 

5 to 10 years 
based on resources on a unit of production basis 
2 to 3 years 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance 
sheet date. 

An  asset’s  carrying  amount  is  written  down  immediately  to  its  recoverable  amount  if  the  asset’s 
carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. 

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount 
and are recognized within “other gains and losses” in the statement of operations. 

 (j)  Exploration and evaluation expenditures and mineral properties 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures relate to the search for mineral resources, the determination 
of  technical  feasibility  and  the  assessment  of  commercial  viability  of  an  identified  resource. 
Exploration and evaluation activities include: 

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Researching and analyzing historical exploration data; 
Gathering exploration data through topographical, geochemical and geophysical studies; 
Exploratory drilling, trenching and sampling; 
Determining and examining the volume and grade of the resource; and 
Surveying, transportation and infrastructure requirement 

Exploration  and  development  expenditures  are  expensed  as  incurred  on  mineral  properties  not 
sufficiently advanced as to identify their development potential. When it has been established that a 
mineral  property  is  considered  to  be  sufficiently  advanced  and  an  economic  analysis  has  been 
completed,  all  further  expenditures  for  the  current  year  and  subsequent  years  are  capitalized  as 
incurred. Costs associated with acquiring a mineral property are capitalized as incurred. 

(k)  Intangible assets 

Intangible  assets  are  initially  recognized  at  cost  and  measured  subsequently  at  cost  less 
accumulated  amortization  and  impairment  losses.  Finite-lived  intangible  assets  are  amortized 
based on resources over a unit of production basis.  

 (l)  Impairment of non-financial assets 

Long lived assets are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that 
the  carrying  amount  may  not  be  recoverable.  An  impairment  loss  is  recognized  for  the  amount  by 
which  the  asset’s  carrying  amount  exceeds  its  recoverable  amount.  The  recoverable  amount  is  the 
higher  of  an  asset’s  fair  value  less  costs  to  sell  and  value  in  use.  For  the  purposes  of  assessing 
impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash 
flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible 
reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

 (m) Provisions 

  Asset retirement obligations 

The  Company  recognizes  a  liability  for  an  asset  retirement  obligation  on  long-lived  assets  when  a 
present  legal  or  constructive  obligation  exists,  as  a  result  of  past  events  and  the  amount  of  the 
liability is reasonably determinable. Asset retirement obligations are initially recognized and recorded 
as a liability based on estimated future cash flows discounted at a risk free rate. This is adjusted at 
each reporting period for changes to factors including the expected amount of cash flows required to 
discharge the liability, the timing of such cash flows and the risk free discount rate. Corresponding 
amounts  and  adjustments  are  added  to  the  carrying  value  of  the  related  long-lived  asset  and 
amortized or depleted to operations over the life of the related asset. 

  Environmental expenditures 

Environmental  expenditures  that  relate  to  current  operations  are  expensed  or  capitalized  as 
appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and which 
do  not  contribute  to  current  or  future  revenue  generation  are  expensed.  Liabilities  are  recorded 
when  environmental  assessments  and/or  remedial  efforts  are  probable,  and  the  costs  can  be 
reasonably estimated. 

Other provisions 

Provisions are recognized when: 

• 
• 

the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event; 
a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation. 

Provisions  are  measured  at  the  present  value  of  the  expenditures  expected  to  be  required  to  settle 
the  obligation,  using  a  pre-tax  discount  rate  that  reflects  current  market  assessments  of  the  time 
value  of  money  and  the  risks  specific  to  the  obligation.  The  increase  in  the  provision  due  to  the 
passage of time is recognized as finance costs. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

(n)  Deferred income taxes 

Deferred  tax  is  recognized  using  the  balance  sheet  method,  providing  for  temporary  differences 
between  the  carrying  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  the 
amounts  used  for  taxation  purposes.  Deferred  tax  is  not  recognized  for  the  following  temporary 
differences:  the  initial  recognition  of  assets  or  liabilities  in  a  transaction  that  is  not  a  business 
combination  and  that  affects  neither  accounting  nor  taxable  income,  and  differences  relating  to 
investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will 
not  reverse  in  the  foreseeable  future.  In  addition,  deferred  tax  is  not  recognized  for  taxable 
temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. 

Deferred  tax  is  measured  at  the  tax  rates  that  are  expected  to  be  applied  to  the  temporary 
differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by 
the year end. 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax 
liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same 
taxable  entity,  or  on  different  tax  entities  where  there  is  a  legal  right  to  do  so,  but  they  intend  to 
settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized 
simultaneously. 

A  deferred  tax  asset  is  recognized  to  the  extent  that  it  is  probable  that  future  tax  profits  will  be 
available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at 
each year end and are reduced to extent that is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will 
be realized. 

 (o) Share capital 

Common shares are classified as equity. 

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a 
deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. 

(p)  Revenue recognition 

Revenues from diamond sales are recognized when the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the 
customer which is when proceeds are received and title is transferred to the purchaser. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 

(q)  Royalties 

Royalties  and  revenue-based  taxes  are  accounted  for  under  IAS  12  when  they  have  the 
characteristics  of  income  tax.  This  is  considered  to  be  the  case  when  they  are  imposed  under 
Government authority and the amount payable is based on taxable income – rather than based on 
quantity produced or as a percentage of revenue. For such arrangements, current and deferred tax 
is  provided  on  the  same  basis  as  described  above  for  other  forms  of  taxation.  Obligations  arising 
from royalty arrangements that do not satisfy these criteria are recognized as current provisions and 
disclosed as part of royalty expenses. The royalties incurred by the Company are considered not to 
meet the criteria to be treated as part of income tax. 

(r)  Stock-based compensation 

The  Company  has  a  stock-based  compensation  plan,  under  which  the  entity  receives  services  from 
employees and non-employees as consideration for equity instruments (options) of the Company. 

Stock options granted to employees are measured on the grant date. Stock options granted to non-
employees are measured on the date that the goods or services are received. 

The fair value of the employee and non-employee services received in exchange for the grant of the 
options is recognized as an expense. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to 
the  fair  value  of  the  options  granted  and  the  vesting  periods.  The  total  expense  is  recognized  over 
the  vesting  period,  which  is  the  period  over  which  all  of  the  specified  vesting  conditions  are  to  be 
satisfied. 

The cash subscribed for the shares issued when the options are exercised is credited to share capital, 
net of any directly attributable transaction costs. 

(s)  Income (loss) per share 

Income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of 
the Company by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the 
year. Diluted income (loss) per share is calculated using the treasury stock method.  

(t)  Leases 

Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor 
are  classified  as  operating  leases.  Payments  made  under  operating  leases  (net  of  any  incentives 
received from the lessor) are charged to the statement of operations on a straight-line basis over the 
period of the lease. 

(u)  Borrowing costs 

Borrowing  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  acquisition,  construction  or  production  of  a  qualifying 
asset are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs not directly attributable 
to a qualifying asset are expensed in the period incurred. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

4.  ADOPTION OF NEW IFRS PRONOUNCEMENTS 

As  of  January  1,  2013,  the  Company  adopted  the  new  and  amended  IFRS  pronouncements  in 
accordance with the transitional provisions outlined in the respective standards as listed below. 

a)  Pronouncement affecting financial statement presentation or disclosures 

i)  IFRS 12, Disclosure of interests in other entities  

The  Company  adopted  IFRS  12  on  January  1,  2013.  IFRS  12  establishes  disclosure 
requirements  for  interests  in  other  entities,  such  as  subsidiaries,  joint  arrangements, 
associates,  and  unconsolidated  structured  entities.  Refer  to  Note  13  for  disclosures  with 
regards to the Company’s subsidiaries. 

ii)  IFRS 13, Fair value measurement 

The Company adopted IFRS 13 with prospective application from January 1, 2013. IFRS 13 is 
a comprehensive standard for fair value measurement and disclosure for use across all IFRS 
standards. The new standard clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell 
an asset, or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants, 
at the measurement date. 

The  adoption  of  IFRS  13  did  not  have  an  effect  on  the  Company’s  consolidated  financial 
statements. 

iii) Amendment to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements  

The  Company  adopted  the  amendments  to  IAS  1  on  January  1,  2013,  with  restrospective 
application.  The  amendments  to  IAS  1  require  items  to  be  grouped  within  other 
comprehensive  income  that  may  be  reclassified  to  profit  or  loss  and  those  that  will  not  be 
reclassified. 

The adoption of the IAS 1 amendments did not have an effect on the Company’s condensed 
interim consolidated financial statements for the current period or prior period. 

b)  Pronouncements affecting accounting policies only 

i)  IFRS 10, Consolidated financial statements 

The  Company  adopted  IFRS  10  on  January  1,  2013  with  retrospective  application.  IFRS  10 
requires an entity to consolidate an investee when it has power over the investee, is exposed, 
or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to 
affect  those  returns  through  its  power  over  the  investee.  IFRS  10  supercedes  IAS  27, 
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and SIC 12, Consolidation – Special Purpose 
Entities. 

The Company has concluded that IFRS 10 did not have an effect on the consolidated financial 
statements for the current year or prior years presented as the adoption did not result in the 
consolidation status of any of the subsidiaries. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

4.  ADOPTION OF NEW IFRS PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued) 

ii)  IFRS 11, Joint arrangements 

The  Company  adopted  IFRS  11  on  January  1,  2013  with  retrospective  application.  IFRS  11 
requires  a  venturer  to  classify  its  interest  in  a  joint  agreement  as  a  joint  venture  or  joint 
operation. Joint ventures will be accounted for using the equity method of accounting whereas 
for a joint operation the venturer will recognize its share of the assets, liabilities, revenue and 
expenses of the joint operation. 

The Company has concluded that IFRS 11 did not have an effect on the consolidated financial 
statements for the current year or prior years presented as the Company does not have any 
joint arrangements. 

iii) IFRIC 20, Stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine 

The  Company  adopted  IFRIC  20  and  applied  the  requirements  to  production  stripping  costs 
incurred  on  or  after  January  1,  2012,  in  accordance  with  the  transitional  provisions.  The 
predecessor  stripping  assets  recorded  as  of  January  1,  2012,  the  date  of  the  earliest  period 
presented, have been reviewed in accordance with IFRIC 20. IFRIC 20 sets out the accounting 
for overburden waste removal (stripping) costs in the production phase of a mine.  

The  Company  has  identified  components  of  ore  bodies  to  be  phases,  pits  or  sub-pits 
depending on the ore body being analyzed. These components align with the view of the mine 
and the plan of mining activities. Previously, the Company recorded stripping activity relating 
to  major  expansions  only.  Under  IFRIC  20,  the  Company  recognizes  stripping  activity  assets 
when the following three criteria are met: 

• 

• 

• 

It  is  probable  that  the  future  economic  benefit  (improved  access  to  the  ore  body) 
associated with the stripping activity will flow to the entity; 
The  entity  can  identify  the  component  of  the  ore  body  for  which  access  has  been 
improved; and 
The  costs  relating  to  the  stripping  activity  associated  with  that  component  can  be 
measured reliably. 

Stripping  activity  assets  capitalized  under  IFRIC  20  are  classified  within  mineral  properties, 
which is consistent with the classification of the asset these costs relate to. 

These  assets  are  amortized  on  a  units-of-production  basis  over  the  remaining  proven  and 
probable reserves of the respective components. 

The Company completed an analysis of IFRIC 20 and did not require any adjustments to the 
consolidated financial statements. 

c)  Pronouncements issued but not yet effective 

In  July  2013,  the  IASB  tentatively  decided  to  defer  the  mandatory  effective  date  of  IFRS  9. 
The  IASB  agreed  that  the  mandatory  effective  date  should  no  longer  be  annual  periods 
beginning  on  or  after  January  1,  2015  but  rather  left  open  pending  the  finalization  of  the 
impairment and classification and measurement requirements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

5.  TRADE RECEIVABLES AND OTHER 

  VAT 
  Trade 
  Other 
  Prepayments 

6.  INVENTORIES 

  Rough diamonds 
  Ore stockpile 
  Parts and supplies 

2013 

2012 

$ 

2,694  $ 
- 
233 
666 

$ 

3,593  $ 

3,034 
1,503 
248 
742 

5,527 

2013 

2012 

$ 

$ 

9,026  $ 
6,674 
5,432 

8,444 
1,797 
3,059 

21,132  $ 

13,300 

Inventory expensed during the year ended December 31, 2013 totaled $43.8 million (2012 – $14.0 
million). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

7.  PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 

Cost 

Construction 
in progress 

Mine and 
plant 
facilities 

Vehicles 

Furniture 
and office 
equipment 

Total 

Balance, January 1, 2012 

$ 

86,720  $ 

7,766  $ 

1,314  $ 

2,319  $ 

98,119 

Additions 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 
Reclassification 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Additions 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

27,070 
862 
(1,256) 
(113,396) 

8,027 
- 
(2,759) 
113,396 

284 
(2) 
(54) 
- 

1,241 
(1,129) 
(70) 
- 

36,622 
(269) 
(4,139) 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 

126,430 

1,542 

2,361 

130,333 

5,212 
(964) 
(14,748) 

100 
(36) 
(187) 

293 
334 
(281) 

5,605 
(666) 
(15,216) 

Balance, December 31, 2013 

$ 

-  $ 

115,930  $ 

1,419  $ 

2,707  $ 

120,056 

Accumulated depreciation 

Balance, January 1, 2012 

$ 

-  $ 

3,164  $ 

282  $ 

171  $ 

3,617 

Depletion, amortization and 
accretion for the year 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Depletion, amortization and 
accretion for the year 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 

7,922 
- 
(334) 

10,752 

8,515 
(33) 
(2,042) 

334 
- 
(18) 

598 

382 
(35) 
(90) 

431 
- 
(14) 

588 

619 
12 
(96) 

8,687 
- 
(366) 

11,938 

9,516 
(56) 
(2,228) 

Balance, December 31, 2013 

$ 

-  $ 

17,192  $ 

855  $ 

1,123  $ 

19,170 

Net book value 

As at December 31, 2012 

As at December 31, 2013 

$ 

$ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

115,678  $ 

944  $ 

1,773  $ 

118,395 

98,738  $ 

564  $ 

1,584  $ 

100,886 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  the  Company  reduced  plant  and  equipment  by  $12.8 
million relating to diamonds sold during the pre-commercial production period. 

Plant  and  equipment  include  interest  and  financing  costs  relating  to  the  construction  of  plant  and 
equipment  prior  to  the  commencement  of  commercial  production.  Interest  and  financing  costs  are 
capitalized only for the project for which funds have been borrowed. Interest expense capitalized in 
2013 was nil (2012 – $2.5 million). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

8.  MINERAL PROPERTIES 

Cost 

Karowe 
Mine 

Mothae 
Diamond 

Mothae 
mining 
license 

Total 

Balance, January 1, 2012 

$ 

68,502  $ 

18,226 

$ 

3,315  $ 

90,043 

Additions 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Additions 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

- 
(547) 
(2,451) 

65,504 

2,324 
(500) 
(7,459) 

29 
- 
(567) 

17,688 

- 
(74) 
(1,773) 

- 
- 
(138) 

3,177 

- 
- 
(609) 

29 
(547) 
(3,156) 

86,369 

2,324 
(574) 
(9,841) 

Balance, December 31, 2013 

  $ 

59,869  $ 

15,841  $ 

2,568  $ 

78,278 

Accumulated depletion 

Balance, January 1, 2012 

$ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

- 

Depletion for the year 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

Balance, December 31, 2012 

Depletion for the year 
Disposals and other 
Translation differences 

1,761 
- 
(37) 

1,724 

4,896 
- 
(403) 

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 
- 
- 

Balance, December 31, 2013 

$ 

6,217  $ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

1,761 
- 
(37) 

1,724 

4,896 
- 
(403) 

6,217 

Net book value 

As at December 31, 2012 

As at December 31, 2013 

a)  Karowe Mine 

$ 

$ 

63,780  $ 

17,688  $ 

53,652  $ 

15,841  $ 

3,177  $ 

2,568  $ 

84,645 

72,061 

A  royalty  of  10%  of  the  sales  value  of  diamonds  produced  from  Karowe  is  payable  to  the 
government of Botswana. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

8.  MINERAL PROPERTIES (continued) 

b)  Mothae Diamond Project 

Pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  mining  agreement,  Mothae  Diamonds,  an  indirect  75%  owned 
subsidiary  of  the  Company  has  a  100%  interest  in  the  project.  The  remaining  25%  of  Mothae 
Diamonds is held by the Government of Lesotho (Note 13). One half of the project interest held 
by the Government is a free carried interest and one half is funded by the Government through 
its share of project dividends. During an initial pre-production test mining stage, a royalty of 4% 
of the sales value of diamonds produced from  Mothae has been paid to  the  government.  At  full 
production the royalty will increase to 8% of diamond sales value. The mining lease is valid until 
September 2019 and renewable for an additional 10 years. 

9.  LONG-TERM DEBT 

  Debenture (a) 

Principal 
Unamortized discount 

  Revolving credit facility (b) 
  Deferred finance charges (b) 

Less: Current portion 

2013 

2012 

$ 

-  $ 
- 

50,000 
(3,179) 

- 
- 

- 

- 

4,500 
(367) 

50,954 

(30,311) 

Long-term portion of long-term debt 

$ 

-  $ 

20,643 

a)   Debenture 

Through  agreements  in  July  2011  and  in  July  2012,  the  Company  secured  a  $50  million 
debenture to fund the development of the Company’s projects. The debenture was repayable in 
quarterly  repayments  of  $8.3  million  commencing  March  31,  2013  and  a  final  maturity  date  of 
June 30, 2014. No interest was payable during the term of the facility.  

The  terms  of  the  debenture  financing  also  included  the  Company  issuing  an  aggregate  of  9 
million  common  shares  (fair  value  $10.7  million)  to  Zebra  and  Lorito  as  consideration  for  the 
facility, in lieu of interest and fees. During the year ended December 31, 2013, accretion of $3.2 
million (2012 - $5.0 million) was recorded of which nil (2012 - $2.5 million) was been capitalized 
in plant and equipment (Note 7). 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  repaid  this  debenture  in  full  and 
recorded a foreign exchange loss on settlement of $2.1 million. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

9.  LONG-TERM DEBT (continued) 

The borrowings were measured initially at fair value. The liability was subsequently measured at 
amortized  cost  using  the  effective  interest  method,  with  interest  expense  recognized  on  an 
effective  yield  basis.  The  effective  interest  rate  was  the  rate  that  exactly  discounts  estimated 
future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability, or (where appropriate) a 
shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.   

As at December 31, 2013 

Current 
portion 

Long-term 
portion 

Total 

Principal 
Unamortized discount 

Total carrying value 

As at December 31, 2012 

Principal 
Unamortized discount 

Total carrying value 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

 $ 

- 
- 

-  $ 

-  $ 
- 

-  $ 

- 
- 

- 

Current 
portion 

Long-term 
portion 

Total 

33,333  $ 
(2,729) 

16,667  $ 

(450) 

50,000 
(3,179) 

30,604  $ 

16,217  $ 

46,821 

b)   Revolving credit facility 

In  April  2012,  the  Company  signed  a  definitive  agreement  with  the  Bank  of  Nova  Scotia  for  a  $25 
million revolving term credit facility with a maturity date of March 26, 2014, which may be extended 
if both parties agree. Funds drawn under the revolving credit facility are due in full at maturity. The 
facility contains financial and non-financial covenants customary for a facility of this size and nature. 
As  at  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  is  in  compliance  with  all  financial  and  non-financial 
covenants. Outstanding amounts under the facility bear interest at LIBOR or an alternative base rate 
plus an applicable margin based on the Company’s leverage ratio.  

The Company has provided security on the two year facility by way of a charge over the Company’s 
Karowe assets and a guarantee by the Company’s subsidiaries, which hold the Karowe assets. 

The Bank of Nova Scotia has first ranking security over the Karowe assets. 

As  at  December  31,  2013,  the  full  amount  under  this  facility  was  available.  As  a  result,  the 
deferred finance charges have been classified under VAT receivables and other. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

10.  RESTORATION PROVISIONS 

The  Company’s  restoration  provisions  relate  to  the  rehabilitation  of  its  diamond  properties.  The 
provisions have been calculated based on total estimated rehabilitation costs and discounted back to 
their present values. The pre-tax discount rates and inflation rates are adjusted annually and reflect 
current  market  assessments.  The  Company  has  applied  a  pre-tax  discount  rate  of  10.8%  at 
December  31,  2013  (10.4%  at  December  31,  2012)  and  an  inflation  rate  of  5.8%  at  December  31, 
2013 (6.2% at December 31, 2012) at the Karowe Mine project. The Company has applied a pre-tax 
discount rate of 9.9% at December 31, 2013 (9.9% at December 31, 2012) and an inflation rate of 
6.0%  at  December  31,  2013  (6.1%  at  December  31,  2012)  at  its  Mothae  Diamond  Project.  The 
rehabilitation  costs  are  expected  to  be  incurred  in  the  period  of  2022  to  2025.  The  estimated  total 
liability for reclamation and remediation costs on an undiscounted basis is approximately $15.9 million 
(December 31, 2012 - $16.9 million). 

Balance, beginning of year 

$ 

Revisions to estimated cash flows 
Accretion of liability component of obligation  
Foreign currency translation adjustment 

Balance, end of year 

Less: Current portion 

2013 

12,242 

2,250 
1,628 
(1,605) 

14,515 

- 

2012 

$               12,486 

(1,069) 
1,284 
(459) 

12,242 

- 

Long-term portion of restoration provisions 

$       

14,515 

$               12,242 

11.  SHARE CAPITAL 

The authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares, with no par value. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

12.  STOCK OPTIONS 

The  Company  has  one  rolling  stock  option  plan  (the  “Plan”)  approved  by  the  shareholders  of  the 
Company on May 13, 2011 which reserves an aggregate of 10% of the issued and outstanding shares 
of the Company for issuance upon the exercise of options granted. Vesting and terms of the option 
agreement are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. 

Movements in the number of stock options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise 
prices are as follows: 

Balance at December 31, 2011 

12,031,671 

$                      0.93 

Number of shares issuable pursuant 
to stock options 

Weighted average exercise 
price per share (CDN$) 

Granted 

Forfeited 

Expired 

Exercised 

150,000 

(391,671) 

(5,181,300) 

(3,943,700) 

1.03 

0.90 

1.13 

0.70 

Balance at December 31, 2012 

2,665,000 

                      0.88 

Granted 

Forfeited 

Expired 

Exercised 

2,775,000 

(50,000) 

(575,000) 

(606,666) 

0.72 

1.03 

0.91 

0.92 

Balance at December 31, 2013 

4,208,334 

$ 

0.76  

The weighted average share price of options exercised during the year was $1.45. 

Options to acquire common shares have been granted and are outstanding at December 31, 2013 as 
follows: 

Outstanding Options 

Exercisable Options 

Range of 
exercise prices 
CDN$ 
$0.61 - $0.70 
$0.71 - $0.80 
$0.81 - $0.90 
$0.91 - $1.00 
$1.01 - $1.25 

Number of 
options 
outstanding 
2,625,000 
1,033,334 
- 
500,000 
50,000 
4,208,334 

Weighted 
average 
remaining 
contractual 
life (years) 

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price 
CDN$ 
0.70 
0.80 
- 
0.98 
1.13 
0.76 

2.3973  $ 
0.9068 
- 
1.3803 
1.1452 
1.8956  $ 

Weighted 
average 
remaining 
contractual 
life (years) 

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price 
CDN$ 
0.70 
0.80 
- 
0.98 
1.13 
0.80 

2.3973  $ 
0.9068 
- 
1.0526 
1.1452 
1.4984  $ 

Number of 
options 
exercisable 
874,909 
1,033,334 
- 
366,665 
33,333 
2,308,241 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

12.  STOCK OPTIONS (continued) 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  an  amount  of  $0.5  million  (2012  –  $0.3  million)  was 
charged  to  operations  in  recognition  of  stock-based  compensation  expense,  based  on  the  vesting 
schedule for the options granted. 

The  fair  value  of  each  option  granted  is  estimated  on  the  date  of  grant  using  the  Black-Scholes 
option pricing model with weighted average assumptions and resulting values for grants as follows: 

Assumptions: 

Risk-free interest rate (%) 
Expected life (years) 
Expected volatility (%) 
Expected dividend 

Results: 

2013 

2012 

1.00 
3.00 
52.85 
Nil 

1.03 
3.00 
51.23 
Nil 

Weighted average fair value of options granted (per option) 

$ 

0.25        $ 

0.35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

13.  PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES 

The Company had the following subsidiaries at December 31, 2013: 

Country of 
incorporation 
and place of 
business 
UK 

Name 
African 
Diamonds Ltd. 

Lucara 
Management 
Services Ltd. 

UK 

Lucara Diamond 
Holdings (I) 
Inc. 

Mauritius 

Mothae 
Diamond 
Holdings Inc. 

Mauritius 

Boteti Diamond 
Holdings Inc. 

Mauritius 

Lucara Diamond 
South Africa 
(Pty) Ltd. 

South Africa 

Wati Ventures 
(Pty) Ltd. 

Botswana 

Debwat 
Exploration 
(Pty) Ltd. 

Botswana 

Nature of 
business 
Intermediate 
holding 
company 
Intermediate 
services 
company 

Intermediate 
holding 
company 

Intermediate 
holding 
company 

Intermediate 
holding 
company 
Intermediate 
holding 
company 

Intermediate 
holding 
company 
Intermediate 
holding 
company 

Boteti Mining 
(Pty) Ltd. 

Botswana 

Mining of 
diamonds 

Mothae 
Diamonds (Pty) 
Ltd. 

Lesotho 

Exploration of 
diamond 
properties 

Proportion of 
shares directly 
held by the 
Company (%) 
100 

Proportion of 
shares held by 
the group (%) 
- 

100 

100 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

75 

Proportion of 
shares held by 
non-
controlling 
interests (%) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

25 

All subsidiary undertakings are included in the consolidation. The proportion of the voting rights in 
the subsidiary undertakings held directly by the parent company do not differ from the proportion of 
ordinary shares held.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

13.  PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES (continued) 

The total non-controlling interest at December 31, 2013 is $1.5 million (2012 - $1.9 million).  

As  consideration  for  acquiring  a  mining  license  from  the  Government  of  Lesotho  (“GOL”),  the 
Company issued the GOL 25% ownership in Mothae Diamonds (Pty) Ltd. (“Mothae Diamonds”). One 
half of the interest held by the GOL is a free-carried interest and the other 12.5% will ultimately be 
paid for by the GOL through its share of future dividends paid by Mothae Diamonds, if any.  

The GOL’s equity interest must be kept at 25% and cannot be diluted by further equity issuances. As 
such,  the  12.5%  free-carried  interest  portion  of  the  Company’s  capital  contributions  into  Mothae 
Diamonds is accounted for as an equity transaction between shareholders. 

Set  out  below  is  the  summarized  financial  information  for  Mothae  Diamonds  which  has  non-
controlling interests that are material to the Company. 

Summarized balance sheet 

2013 

2012 

CURRENT 

Assets 
Liabilities 

NON-CURRENT 

Assets 
Liabilities 

  $ 

$ 

890 
(77) 

813 

8,953 
(608) 

8,345 

NET ASSETS 

  $ 

9,158 

$ 

Summarized statement of operations 

Revenue 
Depreciation 
Loss from continuing operations 
Loss from discontinued operations 
Other comprehensive loss 

Comprehensive loss 

Attributable to non-controlling interests 
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests 

  $ 

$ 

2013 

- 
- 
(758) 
- 
(2,174) 

(2,932) 

(367) 
- 

1,247 
(360) 

887 

11,221 
(761) 

10,460 

11,347 

2012 

- 
(3,262) 
(12,911) 
- 
(397) 

(13,308) 

(1,664) 
- 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

13.  PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES (continued) 

Summarized statement of cash flows 

Cash used in operating activities 
Cash generated from financing activities 
Cash generated from (used in) investing activities 
Effect of exchange rate on cash  

$ 

Net increase (decrease) in cash  
Cash, beginning of year 

Cash, end of year 

2013 

(538)  $ 
742 
54 
(46) 

212 
128 

340 

2012 

(9,746) 
4,680 
(1) 
(43) 

(5,110) 
5,238 

128 

The information above is the amount before inter-company eliminations. 

14.  EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES 

  Test mining 
  Depreciation 
  Resource development 
  Geology 
  Office and other 
  Care and maintenance 
  Diamonds recovered 

15.  ADMINISTRATION 

$ 

2013 

2012 

-  $ 
- 
- 
- 
849 
474 
- 

7,928 
3,262 
1,870 
652 
621 
- 
(1,479) 

$ 

1,323  $ 

12,854 

2013 

2012 

$ 

  Salaries and benefits 
  Professional fees 
  Office and general 
  Travel 
  Stock exchange, transfer agent, shareholder communication 
  Stock based compensation 
  Management fees 
  Depreciation 
  Donations 

5,275  $ 
1,490 
1,313 
894 
775 
517 
489 
423 
253 

$ 

11,429  $ 

4,651 
575 
1,037 
741 
1,575 
286 
504 
146 
19 

9,534 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
	
  
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

16.  GAIN ON SALE OF EXPLORATION PROGRAM DIAMONDS 

During the year ended December 31, 2013, Mothae Diamonds held a diamond sale and received 
gross proceeds of $0.9 million. The sale included the rough diamond inventory that was held at 
December  31,  2012,  which  was  valued  using  the  Company’s  best  estimate  of  the  lower  of  cost 
and  net  realizable  value.  The  Company  has  recorded  a  gain  on  the  sale  of  this  inventory  in  the 
amount of $0.6 million. 

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  Mothae  Diamonds  held  one  diamond  sale  and 
received  gross  proceeds  of  $1.5  million.  The  proceeds  on  this  sale  have  been  netted  against 
exploration expenditures (Note 14). 

17.  INCOME TAXES 

Income tax expense differs from the amount that would result from applying the Canadian federal 
and provincial income tax rates to net income before tax. These differences result from the following 
items: 

  Basic statutory tax rate 

  Net income (loss) before tax 

  Computed income tax expense (recovery) 
  Differences between Canadian and foreign tax rates 
  Non-deductible expenses and other permanent differences 
  Change in future tax rates 
  Benefits from previously unrecognized tax benefits 
  Change in deferred benefits not recognized 
  Exchange rate differences 
  Other 

2013 

2012 

25.75% 

25.00% 

80,213 

(7,525) 

20,655 
(3,962) 
1,331 
(376) 
(8,458) 
4,461 
1,144 
196 

(1,881) 
(749) 
71 
847 
- 
1,104 
655 
(47) 

$ 

14,991  $ 

- 

Income  tax  expense  is  derived  from  income  generated  at  the  Company’s  Karowe  Mine.  The 
Company  recorded  a  deferred  tax  liability  during  the  year,  which  resulted  in  a  corresponding  non-
cash  future  income  tax  expense  of  $14.9  million.  The  deferred  tax  liability  relates  to  temporary 
differences between the accounting and tax base of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, 
restoration provisions and non-capital tax loss pools. The Company has applied a significant portion 
of its non-capital losses in Botswana against taxable income during the year. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

17.  INCOME TAXES (continued) 

The  movement  in  deferred  tax  liabilities  during  the  year,  without  taking  into  consideration  the 
offsetting balances within the same tax jurisdiction, is as follows: 

Balance, beginning of year 

$ 

- 

$               

Future income tax expense 
Foreign currency translation adjustment 

14,895 
(637) 

Balance, end of year 

$        14,258 

$               

- 

- 
- 

- 

2013 

2012 

Deferred income tax assets not recognized 

2013 

2012 

  Tax losses 
  Mineral property, plant and equipment 
  Other deductible temporary differences 

$ 

19,229  $ 
58 
1,045 

26,383 
97 
601 

$ 

20,332  $ 

27,081 

As at December 31, 2013, the Company has non-capital losses for income tax purposes which expire 
as follows: 

2014 

2015 

2016 

Subsequent 
to 2017 

No expiry 
date 

Canada 
United Kingdom 
Botswana 
Lesotho 

$ 

11  $ 

- 
- 
- 

 -  $ 
- 
- 
- 

-  $ 
- 
- 
- 

49,949  $ 
- 
- 
- 

-  $ 

5,085 
30,533 
22,245 

Total 

49,960 
5,085 
30,533 
22,245 

$ 

11  $ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

49,949  $ 

57,863  $ 

107,823 

No tax benefit has been recorded for the majority of the Canadian and Lesotho non-capital losses 
while a tax benefit has been recorded for the Botswana non-capital losses. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

18.  INCOME PER COMMON SHARE 

a)  Basic  

Basic  earnings  per  common  share  are  calculated  by  dividing  the  net  income  attributable  to  the 
shareholders  of  the  Company  by  the  weighted  average  number  of  common  shares  outstanding 
during the year: 

2013 

2012 

Income (loss) for the year – attributable to Shareholders of 
the Company 

$ 

65,317  $ 

(5,911) 

  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 

  376,392,625 

374,621,554 

$ 

0.17  $ 

(0.02) 

b)  Diluted 

Diluted  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  by  adjusting  the  weighted  average  number  of  common 
shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential common shares. For stock options, 
a calculation is done to determine the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value 
(determined as the average market share price of the Company’s outstanding shares for the period), 
based on the exercise prices attached to the stock options. The number of shares calculated above 
is compared with the number of shares that would have been issued assuming the exercise of stock 
options. 

2013 

2012 

Income (loss) for the year – attributable to Shareholders of 
the Company 

$ 

65,317  $ 

(5,911) 

  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 
  Adjustment for stock options 
  Weighted average number of common shares for diluted 

  376,392,625 
120,365 

 374,621,554 
- 

earnings per share 

  376,512,990 

374,621,554 

$ 

0.17  $ 

(0.02) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

19.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

a)  Related party expenses 

The  Company  incurred  the  following  expenses  with  Namdo  Management  Services  Limited 
(“Namdo”),  Mile  High  Holdings  Ltd.  (“Mile  High”)  and  Lundin  Foundation  (“LF”),  companies 
related  by  way  of  directors  in  common.  The  Company  also  incurred  professional  geological 
services  and  laboratory  related  expenditures  from  the  Mineral  Services  Group  (“MS  Group”),  a 
company that is associated with a director of Company. Beginning July 1, 2013, the MS Group is 
no longer a related party. 

Description of services 

Related party 

2013 

Management fees 
Donations 
Exploration related expenditures 
Aircraft charter 

Namdo 
LF 
MS Group 
Mile High 

$ 

$ 

489  $ 
253 
84 
71 

897  $ 

2012 

504 
- 
1,916 
382 

2,802 

b)  Related party liabilities 

The liabilities of the Company include the following amounts due to related parties: 

  Namdo 
  MS Group 

c)  Key management compensation 

2013 

2012 

$ 

$ 

-  $ 
- 

-  $ 

38 
54 

92 

Key management personnel are those persons having the authority and responsibility for planning, 
directing  and  controlling  the  activities  of  the  Company,  directly  or  indirectly.  Key  management 
personnel  include  the  Company’s  executive  officers,  vice-presidents  and  members  of  its  Board  of 
Directors. 

The remuneration of key management personnel were as follows: 

  Salaries and wages 
  Short term benefits 
  Stock based compensation 

2013 

2012 

2,142  $ 
49 
402 

2,593  $ 

1,408 
112 
186 

1,706 

$ 

$ 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

20. SEGMENT INFORMATION 

The Company’s primary business activity is the development and operation of diamond properties in 
Africa. The Company has three operating segments: Karowe Mine, Mothae Diamond Project and 
Corporate and other. 

2013 

Karowe 
Mine 

Mothae 
Diamond 
Project 

Corporate 
and other 

Total 

Revenues 

$ 

180,507  $ 

- 

$ 

-  $ 

180,507 

Income from mining operations 
Exploration expenditures 
Gain on sale of exploration program diamonds 
Finance expenses 
Other income (expenses) 

Net income before tax for the year 

Capital expenditures 

Total assets 

103,899 
- 
- 
96 
(4,836) 

99,159 

(7,822) 

- 
(1,323) 
584 
(67) 
48 

(257) 
- 
- 
(3,814) 
(14,117) 

103,642 
(1,323) 
584 
(3,785) 
(18,905) 

(758) 

(18,188) 

80,213 

- 

(43) 

(7,865) 

222,031 

19,845 

5,312 

247,188 

2012 

Karowe 
Mine 

Mothae 
Diamond 
Project 

Corporate 
and other 

Total 

Revenues 

$ 

41,830  $ 

- 

$ 

-  $ 

41,830 

Income from mining operations 
Exploration expenditures 
Gain on sale of exploration program diamonds 
Finance expenses 
Other income (expenses) 

17,849 
- 
- 
155 
(2,350) 

- 
(12,854) 
- 
(72) 
15 

(92) 
- 
- 
(3,186) 
(6,990) 

17,757 
(12,854) 
- 
(3,103) 
(9,325) 

Net loss before tax for the year 

15,654 

(12,911) 

(10,268) 

(7,525) 

Capital expenditures 

(44,441) 

- 

- 

(44,441) 

Total assets 

207,037 

12,468 

15,846 

235,351 

The geographic distribution of non-current assets is as follows: 

Plant and equipment 

Mineral properties 

Other 

2013 

2012 

2013 

2012 

2013 

2012 

Canada 
Lesotho 
Botswana 

$ 

$ 

142  $ 
486 
100,258 
100,886  $ 

209  $ 

1,369 
116,817 
118,395  $ 

-  $ 

18,408 
53,653 
72,061  $ 

-  $ 

20,865 
63,780 
84,645  $ 

-  $ 

62 
- 
62  $ 

- 
137 
- 
137 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

21.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

a)  Measurement categories and fair values 

As  explained  in  Note  3,  financial  assets  and  liabilities  have  been  classified  into  categories  that 
determine their basis of measurement and, for items measured at fair value, whether changes in fair 
value  are  recognized  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  operations  or  consolidated  statements  of 
comprehensive  loss.  Those  categories  are:  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss;  loans  and  receivables; 
available for sale assets; and, for liabilities, amortized cost.  

The fair value of the Company’s available for sale financial instruments is derived from quoted prices 
in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates 
their carrying amounts due to the fact that there have been no significant changes in the Company’s 
own credit risk. The fair value of all other financial instruments of the Company approximates their 
carrying values because of the demand nature or short-term maturity of these instruments. 

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are categorized as follows: 

ASSETS 
Loans and receivables 

Cash 
Trade receivables 
Other receivables 

Available for sale 
Investments 

LIABILITIES 
Amortized cost 

Trade payables  
Accrued liabilities 

Long-term debt 

December 31, 
2013 

  December 31, 
2012 

  $ 

$ 

49,364 
- 
233 

  $ 

49,597 

$ 

  $ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

90 

90 

9,169 
6,322 
15,491 
- 

  $ 

15,468 

$ 

13,261 
1,503 
248 

15,012 

86 

86 

7,429 
7,266 
14,695  
50,954 

65,649 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

21.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued) 

b)  Fair value hierarchy 

The following table classifies financial assets and liabilities that are recognized on the balance sheet 
at  fair  value  in  a  hierarchy  that  is  based  on  significance  of  the  inputs  used  in  making  the 
measurements. The levels in the hierarchy are: 

Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities 
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or 
liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) 
Level  3  -  Inputs  for  the  asset  or  liability  that  are  not  based  on  observable  market  data  (that  is, 
unobservable inputs). 

Level 1 

Investments 

Level 2 and Level 3 – N/A 

c)  Financial risk management 

December 31, 
2013 

  December 31, 
2012 

  $ 

90 

$ 

86 

The  Company’s  financial  instruments  are  exposed  to  certain  financial  risks,  including  commodity 
price, currency, credit, liquidity and price risks. 

Commodity price risk 

The Company is subject to commodity price risk. Diamonds are not a homogenous product and the 
price  of  rough  diamonds  is  not  monitored  on  a  public  index  system.  The  fluctuation  of  prices  is 
related  to  certain  features  of  diamonds  such  as  quality  and  size.  Diamond  prices  are  marketed  in 
U.S.  dollars  and  long  term  U.S.  dollar  per  carat  prices  are  based  on  external  market  consensus 
forecasts.  The  Company  does  not  have  any  financial  instruments  that  may  fluctuate  as  a  result  of 
commodity price movements. 

Currency risk 

The Company is exposed to the financial risk related to fluctuating foreign exchange rates. All sales 
revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, while directly related costs are denominated in Botswana 
Pula.  At  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  is  exposed  to  currency  risk  relating  to  U.S.  dollar  cash 
held within the Company’s Botswana entity. Based on this exposure, a 10% change in the Botswana 
Pula/U.S. dollar exchange rate would give rise to an increase/decrease of approximately $3.6 million 
in net income for the year. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

21.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued) 

Credit risk 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails 
to  meet  its  contractual  obligations.  The  majority  of  the  Company’s  cash  is  held  through  a  large 
Canadian  financial  institution  with  a  high  investment  grade  rating.  Considering  the  nature  of  the 
Company’s  ultimate  customers  and  the  relevant  terms  and  conditions  entered  into  with  such 
customers, the Company believes that credit risk is limited as customers pay on receipt of goods. 

The  carrying  amount  of  financial  assets  recorded  in  the  financial  statements,  net  of  any  allowance 
for losses, represents the Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk. 

Liquidity risk  

Liquidity  risk  is  the  risk  that  the  Company  will  not  be  able  to  meet  its  financial  obligations  as  they 
become  due.  Cash  flow  forecasting  is  performed  in  the  operating  entities  of  the  Company  and 
aggregated in head office which monitors rolling forecasts of the Company’s liquidity requirements to 
ensure  it  has  sufficient  cash  to  meet  operational  needs  at  all  times.  Such  forecasting  takes  into 
consideration the Company’s debt financing plans.  

The  Company’s  estimated  minimum  contractual  undiscounted  cash  flow  requirements  for  financial 
liabilities were: 

December 31, 2013 

Trade payables and accrued 
liabilities 
Long-term debt 

December 31, 2012 

Trade payables and accrued 
liabilities 
Long-term debt 

Interest rate risk 

Less than 3 
months 

3 months 
to 1 year 

2-5 years  Over 5 years 

$ 

15,491  $ 
- 

-  $ 
- 

-  $ 
- 

- 
- 

Less than 3 
months 

3 months 
to 1 year 

2-5 years  Over 5 years 

$ 

14,695  $ 

-  $ 

-  $ 

- 

33,333 

21,167 

- 
- 

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk results from the effects that changes in interest rates 
may  have  on  the  reported  value  of  cash.  There  is  minimal  risk  that  the  Company  would  recognize 
any  loss  as  a  result  of  a  decrease  in  the  fair  value  of  any  short-term  investments  included  in  cash 
due to their short-term nature. Based on the balance of cash at December 31, 2013, and assuming 
that all other variables remain constant, a 0.25% change in the U.S. prime rate would result in an 
increase/decrease of $0.1 million in the interest accrued by the Company per annum. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

21.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued) 

Equity market risk 

The  Company  is  exposed  to  equity  price  risk  arising  from  its  marketable  securities,  which  are 
classified as available-for-sale. 

22.  CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue 
as a going concern in order to pursue the development of its mineral properties and to maintain a 
flexible capital structure which optimizes costs of capital at an acceptable risk. 

In  the  management  of  capital,  the  Company  considers  items  included  in  equity  attributable  to 
shareholders to be capital. 

The  Company  manages  the  capital  structure  and  makes  adjustments  to  it  in  light  of  changes  in 
economic  conditions  and  the  risk  characteristics  of  the  Company’s  assets.  In  order  to  maintain  or 
adjust  the  capital  structure,  the  Company  may  attempt  to  issue  new  shares  or  debt  instruments, 
acquire or dispose of assets, or to bring in joint venture partners. 

In  order  to  facilitate  the  management  of  its  capital  requirements,  the  Company  prepares  annual 
expenditures  budgets  that  are  updated  as  necessary  depending  on  various  factors,  including 
successful capital deployment and general industry conditions. The annual and updated budgets are 
approved by the Board of Directors. 

23.  COMMITMENTS 

In conjunction with the building and commissioning of a plant upgrade at the Karowe Mine, the 
Company has committed to approximately $1.2 million in capital expenditures. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LUCARA DIAMOND CORP. 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise indicated.) 

24.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 

(a)  Sale of Mothae plant 

In  December  2013,  the  Company  signed  a  memorandum  of  understanding  (“MOU”)  with  Paragon 
Diamonds Ltd. (“Paragon”) for the sale of certain kimberlite processing plant and diamond recovery 
assets. Under the terms of the MOU, the Company will receive consideration of: 

•  $0.1  million  cash  and  4,434,589  common  shares  of  Paragon  on  signing  of  the  asset 

purchase agreement 

•  $0.2 million cash and 5,543,236 common shares of Paragon on commencement of relocation 
of the assets from the Mothae site. The number of common shares will be adjusted should 
an equity raise be completed by Paragon at a price less than £0.04.  

The signing of the asset purchase agreement is anticipated by the end of February 2014. 

As part of the MOU, the Company received a non-refundable deposit of US$50,000 from Paragon in 
December 2013. 

(b)  Litigation 

Upon completion of the African Diamonds plc (“AFD”) Arrangement Agreement which resulted in 
the  Company  holding  an  undivided  100%  ownership  interest  in  the  Karowe  Mine,  the  Company 
retained  certain  liabilities  related  to  legal  proceedings  initiated  by  two  former  directors  of  AFD 
against  AFD  alleging  entitlement  to  a  3%  NSR  on  production  from  the  Karowe  Mine.  The  claim 
was heard in the Botswana High Court in early June 2011. The High Court delivered its ruling in 
August 2011 dismissing the claims against AFD, with costs awarded against the plaintiffs. 

In  September  2011,  the  Company  was  notified  that  the  plaintiffs,  in  the  legal  proceedings 
initiated  against  AFD,  had  filed  an  appeal  of  the  decision  of  the  High  Court  of  Botswana 
dismissing the plaintiff’s claims with costs awarded in favor of AFD. The appeal was heard in the 
Appeal Court of Botswana in January 2014 and judgment was handed down in February 2014.  

The Court of Appeals, the highest court in Botswana upheld the previous ruling by the Botswana 
High  Court,  dismissing  the  claim  against  African  Diamonds,  with  costs  awarded  against  the 
plaintiffs.  The decision is final and there is no further recourse against African Diamonds. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lucara	
  Diamond	
  Corp.	
  

Vancouver	
  Corporate	
  Office:	
  
Suite	
  2000	
  
885	
  West	
  Georgia	
  Street	
  
Vancouver,	
  BC	
  
Canada	
  V6C	
  3E8	
  

T:	
  604	
  689	
  7842	
  
F:	
  604	
  689	
  4250	
  
E:	
  sophias@namdo.com	
  
Contact:	
  Sophia	
  Shane,	
  Investor	
  Relations