Macy’s
Annual Report 2010

Plain-text annual report

2010 ANNUAL REPORT DEVELOPING A CULTURE OF GROWTH macysannual2010_08.indd 3 3/22/11 12:06 AM MACY’S, INC. IS ONE OF ThE NATION’S PREMIER RETAILERS, WITh FISCAL 2010 SALES OF $25.0 BILLION. ThE COMPANY OPERATES ThE MACY’S AND BLOOMINGDALE’S BRANDS WITh ABOUT 850 DEPARTMENT STORES IN 45 STATES, ThE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, GUAM AND PUERTO RICO, AND ThE MACYS.COM AND BLOOMINGDALES.COM WEBSITES. ThE COMPANY ALSO OPERATES FOUR BLOOMINGDALE’S OUTLET STORES. Macy’s BlooMingdale’s Bloomingdale’s, America’s only nationwide, full- line, upscale department store, is recognized for its originality, innovation and fashion leadership. It truly is “Like no other store in the world.” In fact, Bloomingdale’s is a leading attraction for visitors and tourists coming to the United States from around the globe. This brand includes 41 stores, bloomingdales.com and four Bloomingdale’s Outlet locations. Bloomingdale’s opened in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, in February 2010 under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group LLC. foCusing on an upsCale niChe Bloomingdale’s is separating itself from the mainstream and reinforcing its position as an authority for upscale, contemporary fashion. Customers are attracted by the latest styles from the hottest brands, such as Armani, Burberry, Chanel, Christian Dior, David Yurman, Jimmy Choo, Louis Vuitton, Miu Miu, Prada, Ralph Lauren Black Label,Theory and Tory Burch. Bloomingdale’s shoppers have come to expect and savor variety – the newest looks from established brands, as well as unique products from rising young designers. Supporting these fashion brands are exceptional customer amenities – international visitors centers, personal shoppers, outstanding fitting rooms and lounges – elegant events and personalized, attentive service that strengthen customer relationships and build loyalty. Macy’s, established in 1858, is the Great American Department Store – an iconic retailing brand with nearly 810 stores operating coast-to-coast and online at macys.com. Macy’s offers powerful assortments and the best brands, tailored to each and every customer with obvious value, engaging service and unforgettable moments. Celebrating the MagiC of MaCy’s Clearly, Macy’s is distinctly different from other major retailers. Macy’s embraces customers and strives to provide an experience that transcends ordinary shopping. Our DNA includes special events that are magical – the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade, Fourth of July Fireworks, flower shows, fashion extravaganzas, celebrity appearances, cooking demonstrations and holiday traditions ranging from the arrival of Santa Claus to tree lightings and animated window displays. Beyond fantastic events, Macy’s is delivering magical moments every day. We surprise and delight customers with unique and interesting fashion merchandise – including exclusive brands that our customers won’t find elsewhere. We engage customers in stores, online and via mobile devices by offering advice and options that bring fashion ideas to life. Our looks set the tone in style magazines, videos, TV shows, movies, blogs and websites. Our associates take the extra step to help a customer in need. Every year, we receive tens of thousands of messages complimenting our people and saluting the shopping experience at Macy’s. It’s all part of the excitement that we’ve been creating for 152 years. growing through loCalization Localization is a key component of Macy’s strategic formula for continued growth and success. Through My Macy’s, we have invested in talent, technology and marketing that allow us to ensure that each and every Macy’s store is “just right” for the customer who shops in that location. We have provided for more local decision-making in every Macy’s community. We are tailoring our merchandise assortments, space allocations, service levels, visual merchandising and special events store-by-store. macysannual2010_08.indd 3 3/22/11 4:04 AM Terry j. Lundgren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS Over the past five years, we have taken extraordinary steps to reinvent our business and organizational structure at Macy’s, Inc. Between 2005 and 2009, we nearly doubled our size through the May Company acquisition, transformed Macy’s into a nationwide brand by converting nearly 600 stores from regional nameplates, centralized our organization for clarity and speed in decision-making, adopted a breakthrough localization strategy called My Macy’s, and significantly expanded our capabilities in e-commerce and digital marketing. The impact of all of these fundamental changes began coming to fruition in 2010. Simply put, it was a terrific year. • Same-store sales were up 4.6 percent. • Operating income rose by 78 percent to $1.894 billion in 2010 from $1.063 billion in 2009. The increase in operating income was 32 percent, excluding asset impairment, store closing and division consolidation costs and expenses of $25 million in 2010 and $391 million in 2009. • We ended the year with $1.5 billion of cash after paying down more than $1.2 billion of debt and contributing $825 million to our pension plan during fiscal 2010. • Return on invested capital – a key measure of financial productivity – rose significantly in 2010 from 2009. Best of all, we are developing a culture of growth at Macy’s, Inc. We believe the strategies that led to our success in 2010 are still in the early phases of implementation, with plenty of runway ahead to produce further improvements in sales, earnings and cash flow as our execution sharpens. driving SaLeS growTh in 2011 and Beyond In particular as we enter fiscal 2011, four primary strategies are positioning us to continue to drive sales growth. All are rooted in our overriding philosophy for putting the customer at the center of all decisions. My Macy’s Localization – 2010 was the first full year of implementation of My Macy’s, having been piloted in 2008 and rolled out nationally in mid-2009. Already, we have seen significant progress in tailoring the merchandise assortment and shopping experience in each Macy’s location to the customer who shops there. In fact, some of our most successful geographic markets in 2010 sales growth were the original My Macy’s pilot districts from 2008 – indicating that our execution continues to improve with experience. The more we learn about the customer and her preferences, the better we are able to respond store-by-store. Clearly, My Macy’s is a long-term approach that will allow us to continue to adapt to local customers and communities. As each of our 69 My Macy’s districts discovers new avenues for success, we are able to share and leverage best practices across the country. My Macy’s has been a game-changer for our company and continues to represent a sustainable competitive advantage. macysannual2010_08.indd 1 PAGE 1 3/25/11 10:27 AM Distinctive and Exclusive Merchandise – Customers expect newness and unique ideas from us in the form of interesting products they don’t see in other places. In 2010, we launched a number of exciting market brands exclusively at Macy’s, including Kenneth Cole Reaction, Sean John men’s sportswear and Material Girl, a juniors collection from Madonna and her daughter Lourdes. That momentum will continue in 2011, particularly as we fill gaps in our assortment (we call this “white space”) where we are underserving customer needs. A good example of this approach is the spring 2011 launch of our capsule collections that will feature rotating merchandise lines throughout the year from leading designers in Impulse, Macy’s contemporary fashion department. Also in Impulse, we launched in early 2011 a new private brand called Bar III for women and men. In 2010, approximately 43 percent of Macy’s sales were in exclusive or limited distribution brands and labels. Included in this total is Macy’s lineup of very successful private brands, which represented approximately 20 percent of sales in 2010. MAGIC Selling – We launched this energized new approach to customer engagement at Macy’s by training more than 130,000 store associates in 2010, reinforced with a refresher course in early 2011 and ongoing coaching of associates on the sales floor. An initiative unprecedented in its size and scope, MAGIC Selling helps us to better understand the needs of our customers, as well as to provide options and advice. It is, in effect, our in-store growth strategy. Omnichannel Integration – Online sales at Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s have risen by 20 percent or more in each of the past three years (including by 29 percent in 2010). But we believe that the ongoing key to success is the integration across channels – blurring the line between our stores, the Internet and mobile technology to the point that we surround the customer and can respond to her needs no matter which way she prefers to shop and buy. We have taken action to drive our store customers online while driving our online customers into the stores, and using mobile engagement to drive business both online and in the stores. This omnichannel integration is helping Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s to develop deeper relationships with loyal customers who appreciate the convenience and flexibility we bring to the shopping experience. STRENGTH AT BlOOMINGDAlE’S Bloomingdale’s performance was strong in 2010 with sales growth that compared favorably to its upscale competitors. Meanwhile, the Bloomingdale’s brand continued to expand. Bloomingdale’s opened its 41st store in 2010 with an exciting new location in Santa Monica that is smaller and focused on the more relaxed fast-fashion customer in that market. In the fall season, a Bloomingdale’s Outlet concept was launched with four stores in Miami and Sunrise, FL; Paramus, NJ; and Woodbridge, VA. Additional Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores are expected to open in 2011 and beyond. In February 2010, Bloomingdale’s opened in Dubai under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group LLC. This is the first international location for either Bloomingdale’s or Macy’s. INSpIRING OuR ORGANIzATION An essential ingredient in the culture of growth we are building at Macy’s, Inc. is the talent, experience, energy and diversity of our people at all levels. I have said repeatedly that I believe we have the best and most resourceful organization in the retailing business. And we have continued to improve over time in recruiting, retaining and developing the best person for each position. More than ever before, we are encouraging teamwork across functions among individuals with different perspectives and points of view. We are collaborating closely with our vendors and other outside partners. Working together, we are formulating new ideas in every function so they can be evaluated, tested and rolled out quickly if successful. And we are encouraging a higher level of risk-taking with the understanding that growth requires new and often untested approaches to the business. The initial success of our newly unified operating structure in 2010 – including the local focus of My Macy’s – has instilled a renewed sense of momentum in our company. Progress that once was thought to be beyond reach has become reality. We are developing the confidence to stretch ever-higher in the quest to attain and exceed our goals. Clearly, shareholders benefit when we succeed at motivating our associates and delighting our customers. Macy’s, Inc. is committed to maximizing shareholder value as we continue to evolve as a growth company dedicated to customer centricity. The Macy’s, Inc. management team and organization appreciates your support of our company. We look forward to continued progress in building a dynamic growth company capable of accomplishing great things. Terry J. lundgren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer PAGE 2 macysannual2010_08.indd 2 3/22/11 12:07 AM UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2011 Commission File Number: 1-13536 7 West Seventh Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 579-7000 and 151 West 34th Street New York, New York 10001 (212) 494-1602 Incorporated in Delaware I.R.S. No. 13-3324058 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $.01 per share 7.45% Senior Debentures due 2017 6.79% Senior Debentures due 2027 7% Senior Debentures due 2028 New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ‘ No È Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer È Accelerated filer ‘ Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No È The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (July 31, 2010) was approximately $7,873,300,000. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Class Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share Outstanding at February 25, 2011 423,747,325 shares DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Document Parts Into Which Incorporated Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 20, 2011 (Proxy Statement) Part III Explanatory Note On August 30, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of The May Department Stores Company (“May”) by means of a merger of May with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, May’s separate corporate existence terminated. Upon the completion of the Merger, the subsidiary was merged with and into the Company and its separate corporate existence terminated. On June 1, 2007, the Company changed its name from Federated Department Stores, Inc. to Macy’s, Inc. (“Macy’s”). Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Macy’s” or the “Company” are references to Macy’s and its subsidiaries and references to “2010,” “2009,” “2008,” “2007” and “2006” are references to the Company’s fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively. Forward-Looking Statements This report and other reports, statements and information previously or subsequently filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain or may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements are based upon the beliefs and assumptions of, and on information available to, the management of the Company at the time such statements are made. The following are or may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: (i) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “future,” “potential,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “think,” “estimate” or “continue” or the negative or other variations thereof, and (ii) statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including: • • • • • • • • • • • risks and uncertainties relating to the possible invalidity of the underlying beliefs and assumptions; competitive pressures from department and specialty stores, general merchandise stores, manufacturers’ outlets, off-price and discount stores, and all other retail channels, including the Internet, mail-order catalogs and television; general consumer-spending levels, including the impact of general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of the weather or natural disasters; conditions to, or changes in the timing of, proposed transactions and changes in expected synergies, cost savings and non-recurring charges; possible changes or developments in social, economic, business, industry, market, legal and regulatory circumstances and conditions; actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties, including customers, suppliers, business partners, competitors and legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities and officials; adverse changes in relationships with vendors and other product and service providers; risks related to currency, interest and exchange rates and other capital market, economic and geo-political conditions; risks associated with severe weather, natural disasters and changes in weather patterns; risks associated with an outbreak of an epidemic or pandemic disease; the potential impact of national and international security concerns on the retail environment, including any possible military action, terrorist attacks or other hostilities; • • • • risks associated with the possible inability of the Company’s manufacturers to deliver products in a timely manner or meet the Company’s quality standards; risks associated with the Company’s reliance on foreign sources of production, including risks related to the disruption of imports by labor disputes, regional health pandemics, and regional political and economic conditions; risks related to duties, taxes, other charges and quotas on imports; and risks associated with possible systems failures and/or security breaches, including, any security breach that results in the theft, transfer or unauthorized disclosure of customer, employee or company information, or the failure to comply with various laws applicable to the Company in the event of such a breach. In addition to any risks and uncertainties specifically identified in the text surrounding such forward- looking statements, the statements in the immediately preceding sentence and the statements under captions such as “Risk Factors” and “Special Considerations” in reports, statements and information filed by the Company with the SEC from time to time constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual amounts, results, events and circumstances to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Item 1. Business. General. The Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1985. The Company and its predecessors have been operating department stores since 1830. On June 1, 2007, the Company changed its corporate name from Federated Department Stores, Inc. to Macy’s, Inc. and the Company’s shares began trading under the ticker symbol “M” on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). As of January 29, 2011, the operations of the Company included approximately 850 stores in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico under the names “Macy’s” and “Bloomingdale’s” as well as macys.com and bloomingdales.com. The Company also operates four Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores. On June 1, 2005, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Citibank, N.A. (together with its subsidiaries, as applicable, “Citibank”). The Purchase Agreement provided for, among other things, the purchase by Citibank of substantially all of (i) the credit card accounts and related receivables owned by FDS Bank, (ii) the “Macy’s” credit card accounts and related receivables owned by GE Money Bank, immediately upon the purchase by the Company of such accounts from GE Money Bank, and (iii) the proprietary credit card accounts and related receivables owned by May (collectively, the “Credit Assets”). In connection with the sale of these assets, the Company and Citibank entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the “Program Agreement”) with an initial term of ten years expiring on July 17, 2016 and, unless terminated by either party as of the expiration of the initial term, an additional renewal term of three years. The Program Agreement provides for, among other things, (i) the ownership by Citibank of the accounts purchased by Citibank pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, (ii) the ownership by Citibank of new accounts opened by the Company’s customers, (iii) the provision of credit by Citibank to the holders of the credit cards associated with the foregoing accounts, (iv) the servicing of the foregoing accounts, and (v) the allocation between Citibank and the Company of the economic benefits and burdens associated with the foregoing and other aspects of the alliance. On August 30, 2005, upon the completion of the Merger, the Company acquired May’s approximately 500 department stores and approximately 800 bridal and formalwear stores. Most of the acquired May department stores were converted to the Macy’s nameplate in September 2006, resulting in a national retailer with stores in almost all major markets. The operations of the acquired Lord & Taylor division and the bridal group (consisting of David’s Bridal, After Hours Formalwear and Priscilla of Boston) have been divested and are presented as discontinued operations. 2 In 2008, the Company announced the “My Macy’s” localization initiative which was developed with the goal of accelerating sales growth in existing locations by ensuring that core customers surrounding each Macy’s store find merchandise assortments, size ranges, marketing programs and shopping experiences that are custom- tailored to their needs. My Macy’s has concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the “span of control” over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with district planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. Also as part of My Macy’s, the Company’s Macy’s branded stores are organized in a unified operating structure and division central office organizations were eliminated. This has reduced central office and administrative expense, eliminated duplication, sharpened execution, and helped the Company to partner more effectively with its suppliers and business partners. During January 2010, the Company announced plans to launch a new Bloomingdale’s Outlet store concept in 2010, to initially consist of four Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores, each with approximately 25,000 square feet. All four Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores opened during 2010. Additional Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores are expected to roll out to selected locations across the country in 2011 and beyond. Additionally, in February 2010, Bloomingdale’s opened in Dubai, United Arab Emirates under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group, LLC, under which the Company is entitled to a license fee in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement, generally based upon the greater of the contractually earned or guaranteed minimum amounts. The Company’s retail stores and Internet websites sell a wide range of merchandise, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods. The specific assortments vary by size of store, merchandising character and character of customers in the trade areas. Most stores are located at urban or suburban sites, principally in densely populated areas across the United States. For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the following merchandise constituted the following percentages of sales: Feminine Accessories, Intimate Apparel, Shoes and Cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feminine Apparel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Men’s and Children’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Home/Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 36% 36% 36% 26 26 22 23 16 15 27 22 15 100% 100% 100% In 2010, the Company’s subsidiaries provided various support functions to the Company’s retail operations on an integrated, company-wide basis. • The Company’s bank subsidiary, FDS Bank, and its financial, administrative and credit services subsidiary, Macy’s Credit and Customer Service, Inc. (“MCCS”), provide credit processing, certain collections, customer service and credit marketing services in respect of all proprietary and non-proprietary credit card accounts that are owned either by Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”), a subsidiary of Citibank, N.A., or FDS Bank and that constitute a part of the credit programs of the Company’s retail operations. • Macy’s Systems and Technology, Inc. (“MST”), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, provides operational electronic data processing and management information services to all of the Company’s operations. • Macy’s Merchandising Group, Inc. (“MMG”), a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of the Company, is responsible for the design, development and marketing of Macy’s private label brands and certain 3 licensed brands. Bloomingdale’s uses MMG for only a very small portion of its private label merchandise. The Company believes that its private label merchandise further differentiates its merchandise assortments from those of its competitors and delivers exceptional value to its customers. The principal private label brands currently offered by Macy’s include Alfani, American Rag, Bar III, Charter Club, Club Room, Epic Threads, first impressions, Giani Bernini, greendog, Holiday Lane, Hotel Collection, I-N-C, jenni by jennifer moore, John Ashford, JM Collection, Karen Scott, Martha Stewart Collection, Morgan Taylor, Style & Co., Tasso Elba, the cellar, Tools of the Trade, and Via Europa. The principal licensed brands managed by MMG are American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection. The trademarks associated with all of the foregoing brands, other than American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection, are owned by Macy’s. The American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection brands are owned by third parties, which license the trademarks associated with such brands to Macy’s pursuant to agreements which are presently scheduled to expire in 2050 and 2027, respectively. • Macy’s Logistics and Operations (“Macy’s Logistics”), a division of a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, provides warehousing and merchandise distribution services for the Company’s operations. MMG also offers their services, either directly or indirectly, to unrelated third parties. The Company’s executive offices are located at 7 West Seventh Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, telephone number: (513) 579-7000 and 151 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001, telephone number: (212) 494-1602. Employees. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately 166,000 regular full-time and part- time employees. Because of the seasonal nature of the retail business, the number of employees peaks in the holiday season. Approximately 10% of the Company’s employees as of January 29, 2011 were represented by unions. Management considers its relations with its employees to be satisfactory. Seasonality. The retail business is seasonal in nature with a high proportion of sales and operating income generated in the months of November and December. Working capital requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing in mid-summer in anticipation of the fall merchandising season and increasing substantially prior to the holiday season when the Company must carry significantly higher inventory levels. Purchasing. The Company purchases merchandise from many suppliers, no one of which accounted for more than 5% of the Company’s net purchases during 2010. The Company has no material long-term purchase commitments with any of its suppliers, and believes that it is not dependent on any one supplier. The Company considers its relations with its suppliers to be satisfactory. Competition. The retailing industry is intensely competitive. The Company’s stores and direct-to-customer business operations compete with many retailing formats in the geographic areas in which they operate, including department stores, specialty stores, general merchandise stores, off-price and discount stores, new and established forms of home shopping (including the Internet, mail order catalogs and television) and manufacturers’ outlets, among others. The retailers with which the Company competes include Bed Bath & Beyond, Belk, Bon Ton, Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard’s, Gap, J.C. Penney, Kohl’s, Limited, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks, Sears, Target, TJ Maxx and Wal-Mart. The Company seeks to attract customers by offering superior selections, obvious value, and distinctive marketing in stores that are located in premier locations, and by providing an exciting shopping environment and superior service through an omnichannel experience. Other retailers may compete for customers on some or all of these bases, or on other bases, and may be perceived by some potential customers as being better aligned with their particular preferences. 4 Available Information. The Company makes its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge through its internet website at http://www.macysinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The public also may read and copy any of these filings at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains the Company’s filings; the address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Company has made the following available free of charge through its website at http://www.macysinc.com: • • • • • • • Audit Committee Charter, Compensation and Management Development Committee Charter, Finance Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Principles, Non-Employee Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Code of Conduct. Any of these items are also available in print to any shareholder who requests them. Requests should be sent to the Corporate Secretary of Macy’s, Inc. at 7 West 7th Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202. Executive Officers of the Registrant. The following table sets forth certain information as of March 25, 2011 regarding the executive officers of the Company: Name Age Position with the Company Terry J. Lundgren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Chairman of the Board; President and Chief Executive Officer; Director Janet E. Grove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Timothy M. Adams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas L. Cole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jeffrey Gennette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Julie Greiner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Karen M. Hoguet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ronald Klein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Sachse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark S. Cosby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Joel A. Belsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dennis J. Broderick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Vice Chair 57 Chief Private Brand Officer 62 Chief Administrative Officer 49 Chief Merchandising Officer 57 Chief Merchandise Planning Officer 54 Chief Financial Officer 61 Chief Stores Officer 53 Chief Marketing Officer 52 President - Stores 57 Executive Vice President and Controller 62 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Terry J. Lundgren has been Chairman of the Board since January 2004 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 2003; prior thereto he served as the President/Chief Operating Officer and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company from April 2002 to February 2003. Mr. Lundgren served as the President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company from May 1997 to April 2002. Janet E. Grove has been Vice Chair of the Company since February 2009 responsible for facilitating the transition of merchandising, planning and private brand development functions under the new Macy’s organization structure and International Retail Store Development initiatives; prior thereto she served as Vice 5 Chair, Merchandising, Private Brand and Product Development of the Company from February 2003 to February 2009. Ms. Grove also served as Chairman of MMG from 1998 to 2009 and Chief Executive Officer of MMG from 1999 to 2009. Timothy M. Adams has been the Chief Private Brand Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macy’s Home Store from July 2005 to February 2009 and as Chairman of Macy’s Florida from April 2001 to July 2005. Thomas L. Cole has been Chief Administrative Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Vice Chair, Support Operations of the Company from February 2003 to February 2009. Until February 2009, he also was responsible for the operations of Macy’s Logistics since 1995, of MST since 2001, and of MCCS since 2002. Jeffrey Gennette has been Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macy’s West from February 2008 to February 2009, as Chairman of Macy’s Northwest from December 2005 to February 2008 and as Executive Vice President and Director of Stores of Macy’s Central from March 2004 to December 2005. Mr. Gennette served as Senior Vice President/General Merchandise Manager of Macy’s West from May 2001 to March 2004. Julie Greiner has been Chief Merchandise Planning Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto she served as Chairman and CEO of Macy’s Florida from July 2005 to February 2009 and as Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Stores of Bloomingdale’s from April 1998 to July 2005. Karen M. Hoguet has been Chief Financial Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from June 2005 to February 2009. Mrs. Hoguet served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from October 1997 to June 2005. Ronald Klein has been Chief Stores Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macy’s East from February 2004 to February 2009. Peter Sachse has been Chief Marketing Officer of the Company since February 2009 and Chairman of macys.com since April 2006; prior thereto he served as President of Macy’s Corporate Marketing from May 2007 to February 2009 and as Chief Marketing Officer of the Company from June 2003 to May 2007. Mark S. Cosby has been President – Stores of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Macy’s East from May 2007 to February 2009 and as Senior Vice President – Property Development of the Company from July 2006 to May 2007. Joel A. Belsky has been Executive Vice President and Controller of the Company since May 2009; prior thereto he served as Vice President and Controller of the Company from October 1996 through April 2009. Dennis J. Broderick has been Secretary of the Company since July 1993 and Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since May 2009; prior thereto he served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company from January 1990 to April 2009. Item 1A. Risk Factors. In evaluating the Company, the risks described below and the matters described in “Forward-Looking Statements” should be considered carefully. Such risks and matters could significantly and adversely affect the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 6 The Company faces significant competition in the retail industry. The Company conducts its retail merchandising business under highly competitive conditions. Although the Company is one of the nation’s largest retailers, it has numerous and varied competitors at the national and local levels, including conventional and specialty department stores, other specialty stores, category killers, mass merchants, value retailers, discounters, and Internet and mail-order retailers. Competition may intensify as the Company’s competitors enter into business combinations or alliances. Competition is characterized by many factors, including assortment, advertising, price, quality, service, location, reputation and credit availability. If the Company does not compete effectively with regard to these factors, its results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The Company’s sales and operating results depend on consumer preferences and consumer spending. The fashion and retail industries are subject to sudden shifts in consumer trends and consumer spending. The Company’s sales and operating results depend in part on its ability to predict or respond to changes in fashion trends and consumer preferences in a timely manner. The Company develops new retail concepts and continuously adjusts its industry position in certain major and private-label brands and product categories in an effort to satisfy customers. Any sustained failure to anticipate, identify and respond to emerging trends in lifestyle and consumer preferences could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company’s sales are impacted by discretionary spending by consumers. Consumer spending may be affected by many factors outside of the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt and customer behaviors towards incurring and paying debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of the weather or natural disasters. The Company’s business is subject to unfavorable economic and political conditions and other developments and risks. Unfavorable global, domestic or regional economic or political conditions and other developments and risks could negatively affect the Company’s business. For example, unfavorable changes related to interest rates, rates of economic growth, fiscal and monetary policies of governments, inflation, deflation, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, consumer debt payment behaviors, tax rates and policy, unemployment trends, oil prices, and other matters that influence the availability and cost of merchandise, consumer confidence, spending and tourism could adversely impact the Company’s business and results of operations. In addition, unstable political conditions or civil unrest, including terrorist activities and worldwide military and domestic disturbances and conflicts, may disrupt commerce and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The Company’s revenues and cash requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of its business. The Company’s business is seasonal, with a high proportion of revenues and operating cash flows generated during the second half of the fiscal year, which includes the fall and holiday selling seasons. A disproportionate amount of revenues fall in the fourth fiscal quarter, which coincides with the holiday season. In addition, the Company incurs significant additional expenses in the period leading up to the months of November and December in anticipation of higher sales volume in those periods, including for additional inventory, advertising and employees. The Company’s business could be affected by extreme weather conditions or natural disasters. Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which the Company’s stores are located could adversely affect the Company’s business. For example, frequent or unusually heavy snowfall, ice storms, rainstorms or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period could make it difficult for the Company’s customers to 7 travel to its stores and thereby reduce the Company’s sales and profitability. The Company’s business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of the Company’s inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions. Reduced sales from extreme or prolonged unseasonable weather conditions could adversely affect the Company’s business. In addition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes, or a combination of these or other factors, could severely damage or destroy one or more of the Company’s stores or warehouses located in the affected areas, thereby disrupting the Company’s business operations. The Company’s pension costs could increase at a higher than anticipated rate. Significant changes in interest rates, decreases in the fair value of plan assets and investment losses on plan assets could affect the funded status of the Company’s plans and could increase future funding requirements of the pension plans. A significant increase in future funding requirements could have a negative impact on the Company’s cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. Increases in the cost of employee benefits could impact the Company’s financial results and cash flow. The Company’s expenses relating to employee health benefits are significant. Unfavorable changes in the cost of such benefits could impact the Company’s financial results and cash flow. Healthcare costs have risen significantly in recent years, and recent legislative and private sector initiatives regarding healthcare reform could result in significant changes to the U.S. healthcare system. The Company is not able at this time to determine the impact that healthcare reform could have on the Company-sponsored medical plans. Inability to access capital markets could adversely affect the Company’s business or financial condition. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict the Company’s access to this potential source of future liquidity. A decrease in the ratings that rating agencies assign to the Company’s short and long-term debt may negatively impact the Company’s access to the debt capital markets and increase the Company’s cost of borrowing. In addition, the Company’s bank credit agreements require the Company to maintain specified interest coverage and leverage ratios. The Company’s ability to comply with the ratios may be affected by events beyond its control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If the Company’s results of operations or operating ratios deteriorate to a point where the Company is not in compliance with its debt covenants, and the Company is unable to obtain a waiver, much of the Company’s debt would be in default and could become due and payable immediately. The Company’s assets may not be sufficient to repay in full this indebtedness, resulting in a need for an alternate source of funding. The Company cannot make any assurances that it would be able to obtain such an alternate source of funding on satisfactory terms, if at all, and its inability to do so could cause the holders of its securities to experience a partial or total loss of their investments in the Company. The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of its goodwill for possible impairment; if future circumstances indicate that goodwill is impaired, the Company could be required to write down amounts of goodwill and record impairment charges. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company reduced the carrying value of its goodwill from $9,125 million to $3,743 million and recorded a related non-cash impairment charge of $5,382 million. The Company continues to monitor relevant circumstances, including consumer spending levels, general economic conditions and the market prices for the Company’s common stock, and the potential impact that such circumstances might have on the valuation of the Company’s goodwill. It is possible that changes in such circumstances, or in the numerous variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates made by the Company in assessing 8 the appropriate valuation of its goodwill, could in the future require the Company to further reduce its goodwill and record related non-cash impairment charges. If the Company were required to further reduce its goodwill and record related non-cash impairment charges, the Company’s financial position and results of operations would be adversely affected. The Company depends on its ability to attract and retain quality employees. The Company’s business is dependent upon attracting and retaining a large number of quality employees. Many of these employees are in entry level or part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover. The Company’s ability to meet its labor needs while controlling the costs associated with hiring and training new employees is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation and changing demographics. Changes that adversely impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain quality employees could adversely affect the Company’s business. The Company depends upon designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise, goods and services. The Company’s relationships with established and emerging designers have been a significant contributor to the Company’s past success. The Company’s ability to find qualified vendors and access products in a timely and efficient manner is often challenging, particularly with respect to goods sourced outside the United States. The Company’s procurement of goods and services from outside the United States is subject to risks associated with political or financial instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, transport capacity and costs and other factors relating to foreign trade. In addition, the Company’s procurement of all its goods and services is subject to the effects of price increases which the Company may or may not be able to pass through to its customers. All of these factors may affect the Company’s ability to access suitable merchandise on acceptable terms, are beyond the Company’s control and could adversely impact the Company’s performance. The Company depends upon the success of its advertising and marketing programs. The Company’s advertising and promotional costs, net of cooperative advertising allowances, amounted to $1,072 million for 2010. The Company’s business depends on high customer traffic in its stores and effective marketing. The Company has many initiatives in this area, and often changes its advertising and marketing programs. There can be no assurance as to the Company’s continued ability to effectively execute its advertising and marketing programs, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The benefits expected to be realized from the expansion of the Company’s market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure are subject to various risks. The Company’s success in fully realizing the anticipated benefits from the expansion of its market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure will depend in large part on achieving anticipated cost savings, business opportunities and growth prospects. The Company’s ability to benefit from expanded market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure is subject to both the risks affecting the Company’s business generally and the inherent difficulties associated with implementing these initiatives. The failure of the Company to fully realize the benefits expected to result from these initiatives could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. Parties with whom the Company does business may be subject to insolvency risks or may otherwise become unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to the Company. The Company is a party to contracts, transactions and business relationships with various third parties, including vendors, suppliers, service providers, lenders and participants in joint ventures, strategic alliances and other joint commercial relationships, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other 9 obligations to the Company. In some cases, the Company depends upon such third parties to provide essential leaseholds, products, services or other benefits, including with respect to store and distribution center locations, merchandise, advertising, software development and support, logistics, other agreements for goods and services in order to operate the Company’s business in the ordinary course, extensions of credit, credit card accounts and related receivables, and other vital matters. Current economic, industry and market conditions could result in increased risks to the Company associated with the potential financial distress or insolvency of such third parties. If any of these third parties were to become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, the rights and benefits of the Company in relation to its contracts, transactions and business relationships with such third parties could be terminated, modified in a manner adverse to the Company, or otherwise impaired. The Company cannot make any assurances that it would be able to arrange for alternate or replacement contracts, transactions or business relationships on terms as favorable as the Company’s existing contracts, transactions or business relationships, if at all. Any inability on the part of the Company to do so could negatively affect the Company’s cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. A material disruption in the Company’s computer systems could adversely affect the Company’s business or results of operations. The Company relies extensively on its computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage its business. The Company’s computer systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by the Company’s employees. If the Company’s computer systems are damaged or cease to function properly, the Company may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and the Company may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in its operations in the interim. Any material interruption in the Company’s computer systems could adversely affect its business or results of operations. A privacy breach could result in negative publicity and adversely affect the Company’s business. The protection of customer, employee, and company data is critical to the Company. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements across business units. In addition, customers have a high expectation that the Company will adequately protect their personal information. A significant breach of customer, employee, or company data could attract a substantial amount of media attention, damage the Company’s customer relationships and reputation and result in lost sales, fines, or lawsuits. A regional or global health pandemic could severely affect the Company’s business. A health pandemic is a disease that spreads rapidly and widely by infection and affects many individuals in an area or population at the same time. If a regional or global health pandemic were to occur, depending upon its location, duration and severity, the Company’s business could be severely affected. Customers might avoid public places in the event of a health pandemic, and local, regional or national governments might limit or ban public gatherings to halt or delay the spread of disease. A regional or global health pandemic might also adversely impact the Company’s business by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials and products in its supply chain and by causing staffing shortages in its stores. The Company is subject to numerous regulations that could adversely affect its business. The Company is subject to customs, child labor, truth-in-advertising and other laws, including consumer protection regulations and zoning and occupancy ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of retail stores and warehouse facilities. Although the Company undertakes to monitor changes in these laws, if these laws change without the Company’s knowledge, or are violated by importers, designers, manufacturers or distributors, the Company could experience 10 delays in shipments and receipt of goods or be subject to fines or other penalties under the controlling regulations, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s business. Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect the Company’s business or financial condition. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and initiatives, including laws and regulations with respect to the credit card industry including the Credit Card Act of 2009 and the Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which may change from time to time. In addition, the Company is regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect the Company’s business and financial condition. Factors beyond the Company’s control could affect the Company’s stock price. The Company’s stock price, like that of other retail companies, is subject to significant volatility because of many factors, including factors beyond the control of the Company. These factors may include: • • • • • • general economic and stock and credit market conditions; risks relating to the Company’s business and its industry, including those discussed above; strategic actions by the Company or its competitors; variations in the Company’s quarterly results of operations; future sales or purchases of the Company’s common stock; and investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with the Company’s common stock relative to other investment alternatives. In addition, the Company may fail to meet the expectations of its stockholders or of analysts at some time in the future. If the analysts that regularly follow the Company’s stock lower their rating or lower their projections for future growth and financial performance, the Company’s stock price could decline. Also, sales of a substantial number of shares of the Company’s common stock in the public market or the appearance that these shares are available for sale could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. None. Item 2. Properties. The properties of the Company consist primarily of stores and related facilities, including warehouses and distribution and fulfillment centers. The Company also owns or leases other properties, including corporate office space in Cincinnati and New York and other facilities at which centralized operational support functions are conducted. As of January 29, 2011, the operations of the Company included 850 retail stores in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam, comprising a total of approximately 154,200,000 square feet. Of such stores, 467 were owned, 268 were leased and 115 stores were operated under arrangements where the Company owned the building and leased the land. Substantially all owned properties are held free and clear of mortgages. Pursuant to various shopping center agreements, the Company is obligated to operate certain stores for periods of up to 20 years. Some of these agreements require that the stores be operated under a particular name. Most leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes, maintenance and other costs; some also require additional payments based on percentages of sales and some contain purchase options. Certain of the Company’s real estate leases have terms that extend for a significant number of years and provide for rental rates that increase or decrease over time. 11 Additional information about the Company’s stores and warehouses, distribution and fulfillment centers (“DC’s”) as of January 29, 2011 is as follows: Geographic Region Mid-Atlantic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Northeast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Northwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Southeast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Southwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Midwest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Central Total Stores Owned Stores Leased Stores Stores Subject to a Ground Lease Total DC’s Owned DC’s 107 84 104 126 110 117 96 106 850 55 65 54 39 72 45 58 79 33 15 41 69 17 48 27 18 19 4 9 18 21 24 11 9 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 467 268 115 21 16 The eight geographic regions detailed in the foregoing table are based on the Company’s Macy’s branded operational structure. The Company’s retail stores are located at urban or suburban sites, principally in densely populated areas across the United States. Store count activity was as follows: Store count at beginning of fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New stores opened and other expansions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stores closed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 7 (7) 847 9 (6) 853 11 (17) Store count at end of fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850 850 847 2010 2009 2008 Item 3. Legal Proceedings. On October 3, 2007, Ebrahim Shanehchian, an alleged participant in the Macy’s, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of persons who participated in the 401(k) Plan and The May Department Stores Company Profit Sharing Plan (the “May Plan”) between February 27, 2005 and the present. The lawsuit has been conditionally certified as a class action. The complaint alleges that the Company, as well as members of the Company’s board of directors and certain members of senior management, breached various fiduciary duties owed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to participants in the 401(k) Plan and the May Plan, by making false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operations and prospects in relation to the integration of the acquired May operations, resulting in supposed “artificial inflation” of the Company’s stock price and “imprudent investment” by the 401(k) Plan and the May Plan in Macy’s stock. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and costs. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to contest it vigorously. The Company and its subsidiaries are also involved in various proceedings that are incidental to the normal course of their businesses. As of the date of this report, the Company does not expect that any of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Item 4. Reserved. 12 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol “M.” As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately 23,000 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth for each fiscal quarter during 2010 and 2009 the high and low sales prices per share of Common Stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape and the dividend declared with respect to each fiscal quarter on each share of Common Stock. 2010 2009 Low High Dividend Low High Dividend 1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4th Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.34 16.93 18.70 22.78 25.25 24.84 25.26 26.32 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 6.27 10.27 13.58 15.39 14.09 15.29 20.84 19.77 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 The declaration and payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, are subject to restrictions under the Company’s credit facility and may be affected by various other factors, including the Company’s earnings, financial condition and legal or contractual restrictions. The following table provides information regarding the Company’s purchases of Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2010. October 31, 2010 – November 27, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . November 28, 2010 – January 1, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 2, 2011 – January 29, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Number of Shares Purchased (thousands) – – – – Average Price per Share ($) Number of Shares Purchased under Program (1) Open Authorization Remaining (1)($) – – – – (thousands) – – – – (millions) 852 852 852 (1) Commencing in January 2000, the Company’s board of directors has from time to time approved authorizations to purchase, in the aggregate, up to $9,500 million of Common Stock. All authorizations are cumulative and do not have an expiration date. As of January 29, 2011, $852 million of authorization remained unused. Although the Company has not made any purchases of Common Stock since February 1, 2008 and currently does not intend to make any such purchases in 2011, it may resume purchases of Common Stock under these or possible future authorizations in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise at any time and from time to time without prior notice. 13 The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Common Stock with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and the Standard & Poor’s Retail Department Store Index for the period from January 27, 2006 through January 28, 2011, assuming an initial investment of $100 and the reinvestment of all dividends, if any. M S&P 500 Retail Department Stores S&P 500 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 The companies included in the S&P Retail Department Store Index are Dillard’s, Macy’s, J.C. Penney, Kohl’s, Nordstrom and Sears. 14 Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto and the other information contained elsewhere in this report. 2010 2009** 2008** 2007 2006* (millions, except per share data) Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory valuation adjustments – May integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,003 (14,824) – $ 23,489 (13,973) – $ 24,892 (15,009) – $ 26,313 (15,677) – $ 26,970 (16,019) (178) Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May integration costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gains on sale of accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . Federal, state and local income tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discontinued operations, net of income taxes (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share: Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per share: 10,179 (8,260) (25) – – – 1,894 (579) 5 1,320 (473) 847 – 847 2.00 2.00 $ $ $ $ 9,516 (8,062) (391) – – – 1,063 (562) 6 507 (178) 329 – 329 9,883 (8,481) (398) (5,382) – – (4,378) (588) 28 (4,938) 163 (4,775) – 10,636 (8,554) – – (219) – 1,863 (579) 36 1,320 (411) 909 (16) $ (4,775) $ 893 .78 .78 $ (11.34) $ (11.34) 2.04 2.00 Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid per share (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance Sheet Data (at year end): Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.98 1.98 422.2 $ .2000 $ 1,150 505 $ $ 1,464 20,631 454 6,971 5,530 $ .78 .78 420.4 $ .2000 $ 1,210 460 $ $ 1,686 21,300 242 8,456 4,653 $ (11.34) $ (11.34) 420.0 $ .5275 $ 1,278 897 $ 2.01 1.97 445.6 $ .5175 $ 1,304 $ 1,105 $ 1,385 22,145 966 8,733 4,620 $ 676 27,789 666 9,087 9,907 10,773 (8,678) – – (450) 191 1,836 (451) 61 1,446 (458) 988 7 995 1.83 1.84 $ $ $ 1.80 1.81 539.0 $ .5075 $ 1,265 $ 1,392 $ 1,294 29,550 650 7,847 12,254 53 weeks * ** The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change retroactively to fiscal 2008. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. Interest expense in 2010 includes approximately $66 million of expenses associated with the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt. Interest expense includes a gain of approximately $54 million in 2006 related to the completion of a debt tender offer. (a) (b) Discontinued operations include (1) for 2007, the after-tax results of the After Hours Formalwear business, including an after-tax loss of $7 million on the disposal of After Hours Formalwear, and (2) for 2006, the after-tax results of operations of the Lord & Taylor division and the Bridal Group division (including David’s Bridal, After Hours Formalwear, and Priscilla of Boston), including after-tax losses of $38 million and $18 million on the disposals of the Lord & Taylor division and the David’s Bridal and Priscilla of Boston businesses, respectively. (c) Cash dividends paid for 2006 have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock-split effected in the form of a stock dividend distributed on June 9, 2006. 15 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The Company is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico. As of January 29, 2011, the Company’s operations were conducted through Macy’s, macys.com, Bloomingdale’s, bloomingdales.com and Bloomingdale’s Outlet which are aggregated into one reporting segment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” The Company is focused on four key strategies for continued growth in sales, earnings and cash flow in the years ahead: (i) maximizing the My Macy’s localization initiative; (ii) developing private and exclusive brands; (iii) embracing customer centricity, including engaging customers on the selling floor; and (iv) driving the omnichannel business. The My Macy’s localization initiative was developed with the goal of accelerating sales growth in existing locations by ensuring that core customers surrounding each Macy’s store find merchandise assortments, size ranges, marketing programs and shopping experiences that are custom-tailored to their needs. My Macy’s has concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the “span of control” over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with district planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. Also as part of My Macy’s, the Company’s Macy’s branded stores are organized in a unified operating structure and division central office organizations were eliminated. This has reduced central office and administrative expense, eliminated duplication, sharpened execution, and helped the Company to partner more effectively with its suppliers and business partners. The Company’s omnichannel strategy allows customers to shop seamlessly in stores, online and via mobile devices. As part of the comprehensive focus on its omnichannel business, the Company is building an efficient and resourceful organization that thrives on unrelenting creativity and innovation. Current and future expansions to the macys.com and bloomingdales.com online businesses represent investments in merchandising, marketing and site development, all of which complement ongoing improvements in systems infrastructure, fulfillment capacity and customer service. During 2010, the Company launched a new Bloomingdale’s Outlet store concept, which initially consists of four Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores, each with approximately 25,000 square feet. Additional Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores are expected to roll out to selected locations across the country in 2011 and beyond. Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores offer a range of apparel and accessories, including women’s ready-to-wear, men’s, children’s, women’s shoes, fashion accessories, jewelry, handbags and intimate apparel. Additionally, in February 2010, Bloomingdale’s opened in Dubai, United Arab Emirates under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group, LLC, under which the Company is entitled to a license fee in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement, generally based upon the greater of the contractually earned or guaranteed minimum amounts. During 2010, the Company opened two new Macy’s stores, one new Bloomingdale’s store, and four Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores. During 2009, the Company opened five new Macy’s department stores, re-opened two Macy’s department stores that had been damaged in 2008 by Hurricane Ike, opened one replacement Macy’s department store, and also expanded into an additional Macy’s location in an existing mall. In 2011, the Company intends to open three Bloomingdale’s Outlet stores and re-open a Macy’s department store that had been closed in 2010 due to flood damage. 16 The Company’s operations are impacted by competitive pressures from department stores, specialty stores, mass merchandisers and all other retail channels. The Company’s operations are also impacted by general consumer spending levels, including the impact of general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of weather or natural disasters and other factors over which the Company has little or no control. Throughout 2008 and into 2009, consumer spending levels were adversely affected by a number of factors, including substantial declines in the level of general economic activity and real estate and investment values, substantial increases in consumer pessimism, unemployment and the costs of basic necessities, and a significant tightening of consumer credit. These conditions adversely affected, and to varying degrees continue to adversely affect, the amount of funds that consumers are willing and able to spend for discretionary purchases, including purchases of some of the merchandise offered by the Company. These conditions also adversely affected the projected future cash flows attributable to the Company’s operations, including the projected future cash flows assumed in connection with the acquisition of The May Department Stores Company (“May”), resulting in the Company recording in the fourth quarter of 2008 a reduction in the carrying value of its goodwill, and a related non-cash impairment charge, in the amount of $5,382 million. The Company experienced significantly higher sales growth and steady gross margin and cash flow in 2010, and therefore is optimistic about the improvement in current and future economic conditions. The effects of economic conditions have been, and may continue to be, experienced differently, or at different times, in the various geographic regions in which the Company operates, in relation to the different types of merchandise that the Company offers for sale, or in relation to the Company’s Macy’s-branded and Bloomingdale’s-branded operations. All economic conditions, however, ultimately affect the Company’s overall operations. Based on its assessment of current and anticipated market conditions and its recent performance, the Company is assuming that its comparable store sales in 2011 will increase approximately 3% from 2010 levels. The discussion in this Item 7 should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. The discussion in this Item 7 contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Company’s plans, estimates and beliefs. The Company’s actual results could materially differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to those differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.” Results of Operations Net sales include merchandise sales, leased department income, shipping and handling fees and sales to third party retailers. In 2010, the Company began including sales of private brand goods directly to third party retailers and sales of excess inventory to third parties in net sales. These items were previously reported, net of the related cost of sales, in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) expenses. This change in presentation had an immaterial impact on reported net sales, does not impact comparable store sales, net income (loss) or diluted earnings (loss) per share, and was not applied retroactively to annual periods prior to fiscal 2010. The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. Net income for 2010 was $847 million, compared to net income of $329 million for 2009, reflecting the benefits of the strategic initiatives at 17 Macy’s and the continued strong performance at Bloomingdale’s. The net income for 2010 includes the impact of $25 million of impairments and store closing costs. The net income for 2009 included the impact of $391 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs. Net sales for 2010 totaled $25,003 million, compared to net sales of $23,489 million for 2009, an increase of $1,514 million or 6.4%. On a comparable store basis, net sales for 2010 were up 4.6% compared to 2009. Sales from the Company’s Internet businesses in 2010 increased 28.7% compared to 2009 and positively affected the Company’s 2010 comparable store sales by 0.9%. The Company has realized continued success in the My Macy’s localization strategy. Geographically, sales in 2010 were strongest in Florida and the upper Midwest. By family of business, sales in 2010 were strongest in updated women’s apparel, particularly the Company’s I-N-C brand, jewelry and watches, men’s apparel and accessories, luggage, furniture and mattresses. Sales of the Company’s private label brands continued to be strong and represented approximately 20% of net sales in the Macy’s-branded stores in 2010. Sales in 2010 were less strong in traditional women’s sportswear. The Company calculates comparable store sales as sales from stores in operation throughout 2009 and 2010 and all net Internet sales. Stores undergoing remodeling, expansion or relocation remain in the comparable store sales calculation unless the store is closed for a significant period of time. Definitions and calculations of comparable store sales differ among companies in the retail industry. Cost of sales was $14,824 million or 59.3% of net sales for 2010, compared to $13,973 million or 59.5% of net sales for 2009, an increase of $851 million. The improved cost of sales rate reflects the benefit of good inventory management throughout 2010. The valuation of merchandise inventories on the last-in, first-out basis did not impact cost of sales in either period. SG&A expenses were $8,260 million or 33.0% of net sales for 2010, compared to $8,062 million or 34.3% of net sales for 2009, an increase of $198 million. The SG&A rate as a percent of net sales was lower in 2010, as compared to 2009, reflecting an increase in net sales. SG&A expenses in 2010 increased due to higher selling costs as a result of stronger sales, higher workers’ compensation and general liability insurance costs, higher pension and supplementary retirement plan expense, and higher costs in support of the Company’s omnichannel operations, partially offset by lower depreciation and amortization expense, lower stock-based compensation expense, higher income from credit operations and lower advertising expense. Workers’ compensation and general liability insurance costs were $148 million for 2010, compared to $124 million for 2009. Pension and supplementary retirement plan expense amounted to $144 million for 2010, compared to $110 million for 2009. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,150 million for 2010, compared to $1,210 million for 2009. Stock-based compensation expense was $66 million for 2010, compared to $76 million for 2009. Income from credit operations was $332 million in 2010 as compared to $323 million in 2009. Advertising expense, net of cooperative advertising allowances, was $1,072 million for 2010 compared to $1,087 million for 2009. Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2010 amounted to $25 million and included $18 million of asset impairment charges and $7 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2011. Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2009 amounted to $391 million and included $115 million of asset impairment charges, $6 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2010, and $270 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs. Net interest expense was $574 million for 2010, compared to $556 million for 2009, an increase of $18 million. The increase in net interest expense is primarily due to approximately $66 million of expenses associated with the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt during 2010, partially offset by lower levels of borrowings due primarily to such early retirement of outstanding debt. 18 The Company’s effective tax rate of 35.8% for 2010 and 35.2% for 2009 differ from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35%, and on a comparative basis, principally because of the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations. Federal, state and local income tax expense for 2009 included a benefit of approximately $21 million related to the settlement of federal income tax examinations, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries. Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009. Net income for 2009 was $329 million, compared to the net loss of $4,775 million for 2008. The net income for 2009 included the impact of $391 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs. The net loss for 2008 included the impact of $5,382 million of goodwill impairment charges and $398 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs. Net sales for 2009 totaled $23,489 million, compared to net sales of $24,892 million for 2008, a decrease of $1,403 million or 5.6%. On a comparable store basis, net sales for 2009 were down 5.3% compared to 2008. Sales from the Company’s Internet businesses in 2009 increased 19.6% compared to 2008 and positively affected the Company’s 2009 comparable store sales by 0.6%. Geographically, sales in 2009 were strong in the Midwest and weaker in Florida and California. By family of business, sales in 2009 were strongest in moderate apparel, updated better women’s sportswear, women’s shoes, outerwear, jewelry and watches, housewares, home textiles and mattresses. Sales of the Company’s private label brands continued to be strong and represented approximately 19% of net sales in the Macy’s-branded stores in 2009. The weaker businesses during 2009 included traditional better women’s sportswear, men’s suits, handbags, fragrances, fine china and crystal and furniture. The Company calculates comparable store sales as net sales from stores in operation throughout 2008 and 2009 and all net Internet sales. Stores undergoing remodeling, expansion or relocation remain in the comparable store sales calculation unless the store is closed for a significant period of time. Definitions and calculations of comparable store sales differ among companies in the retail industry. Cost of sales was $13,973 million or 59.5% of net sales for 2009, compared to $15,009 million or 60.3% of net sales for 2008, a decrease of $1,036 million. The improved cost of sales rate reflected the benefit of good inventory management throughout 2009. The valuation of merchandise inventories on the last-in, first-out basis did not impact cost of sales in either period. SG&A expenses were $8,062 million or 34.3% of net sales for 2009, compared to $8,481 million or 34.1% of net sales for 2008, a decrease of $419 million. The SG&A rate as a percent of net sales was higher in 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily because of weaker sales. SG&A expenses in 2009 benefited from consolidation- related expense savings, lower depreciation and amortization expenses, lower workers’ compensation and general liability insurance costs and lower advertising expense, partially offset by higher stock-based compensation expense, higher performance based incentive compensation expense, lower income from credit operations and higher costs in support of the Company’s omnichannel operations. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,210 million for 2009, compared to $1,278 million for 2008. Workers’ compensation and general liability insurance costs were $124 million for 2009, compared to $164 million for 2008. Advertising expense, net of cooperative advertising allowances, was $1,087 million for 2009 compared to $1,239 million for 2008. Stock-based compensation expense was $76 million for 2009, compared to $43 million for 2008. Income from credit operations was $323 million in 2009 as compared to $372 million in 2008. Pension and supplementary retirement plan expense amounted to $110 million for 2009, compared to $114 million for 2008. Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2009 amounted to $391 million and included $115 million of asset impairment charges, $6 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2010, and $270 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs. 19 Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2008 amounted to $398 million and included $211 million of asset impairment charges, $11 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2009, and $176 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs. Goodwill impairment charges for 2008 amounted to $5,382 million, which represented a write down of goodwill in the amount of the excess of the previous carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill, as calculated under the two-step goodwill impairment process in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-20, “Goodwill.” Net interest expense was $556 million for 2009, compared to $560 million for 2008, a decrease of $4 million. The decrease in net interest expense for 2009, as compared to 2008, resulted primarily from a lower level of borrowings due to retirement of debt at maturity and the debt tender offer completed during 2009, and was partially offset by a decrease in interest income due to lower rates on invested cash. The Company’s effective income tax rate of 35.2% for 2009 differed from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35.0% principally because of the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations. Federal, state and local income tax expense for 2009 included a benefit of approximately $21 million related to the settlement of federal income tax examinations, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries. The Company’s effective income tax rate for 2008 differed from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35.0%, principally because of the impact of non-deductible goodwill impairment charges, the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, cash on hand and the credit facility described below. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 was $1,506 million, compared to $1,750 million provided in 2009. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2010 compared to 2009 includes a greater decrease in other liabilities not separately identified, primarily accelerated pension contributions. During 2010, the Company made pension funding contributions totaling approximately $825 million, compared to pension funding contributions made during 2009 of approximately $370 million. Net cash used by investing activities was $465 million for 2010, compared to net cash used by investing activities of $377 million for 2009. Investing activities for 2010 include purchases of property and equipment totaling $339 million and capitalized software of $166 million, compared to purchases of property and equipment totaling $355 million and capitalized software of $105 million for 2009. Cash flows from investing activities included $74 million and $60 million from the disposition of property and equipment for 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company’s budgeted capital expenditures are approximately $800 million for 2011, primarily related to store remodels, maintenance, technology and omnichannel investments, and distribution network improvements, including construction of a new fulfillment center. Management presently anticipates funding such expenditures with cash on hand and cash from operations. Net cash used by the Company for all financing activities was $1,263 million for 2010, including the repayment of $1,245 million of debt and the payment of $84 million of cash dividends, partially offset by an increase in outstanding checks of $24 million and the issuance of $43 million of common stock, primarily related 20 to the exercise of stock options. The debt repaid during 2010 includes the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt with various stated maturities, and payment at maturity of $76 million of 8.5% senior notes due June 1, 2010 and $150 million of 10.625% senior debentures due November 1, 2010. Net cash used by the Company for all financing activities was $1,072 million for 2009, including the repayment of $966 million of debt, a decrease in outstanding checks of $29 million, and the payment of $84 million of cash dividends. The debt repaid during 2009 included $350 million of 6.30% senior notes due April 1, 2009 and $600 million of 4.80% senior notes due July 15, 2009. The Company is a party to a credit agreement with certain financial institutions providing for revolving credit borrowings and letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000 million (which amount may be increased to $2,500 million at the option of the Company, subject to the willingness of existing or new lenders to provide commitments for such additional financing) outstanding at any particular time. This agreement is set to expire August 30, 2012. As of January 29, 2011 and throughout all of 2010, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this agreement. The credit agreement requires the Company to maintain a specified interest coverage ratio for the latest four quarters of no less than 3.25 and a specified leverage ratio as of and for the latest four quarters of no more than 4.50. The Company’s interest coverage ratio for 2010 was 5.64 and its leverage ratio at January 29, 2011 was 2.34, in each case as calculated in accordance with the credit agreement. The interest coverage ratio is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) over net interest expense and the leverage ratio is defined as debt over EBITDA. For purposes of these calculations EBITDA is calculated as net income plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash impairment of goodwill, intangibles and real estate, non-recurring cash charges not to exceed in the aggregate $500 million from the date of the agreement and extraordinary losses less interest income and non-recurring or extraordinary gains. Debt and net interest are adjusted to exclude the premium on acquired debt and the resulting amortization, respectively. A breach of a restrictive covenant in the Company’s credit agreement or the inability of the Company to maintain the financial ratios described above could result in an event of default under the credit agreement. In addition, an event of default would occur under the credit agreement if any indebtedness of the Company in excess of an aggregate principal amount of $150 million becomes due prior to its stated maturity or the holders of such indebtedness become able to cause it to become due prior to its stated maturity. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement, elect to declare the outstanding principal, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. Moreover, most of the Company’s senior notes and debentures contain cross-default provisions based on the non-payment at maturity, or other default after an applicable grace period, of any other debt, the unpaid principal amount of which is not less than $100 million, that could be triggered by an event of default under the credit agreement. In such an event, the Company’s senior notes and debentures that contain cross-default provisions would also be subject to acceleration. At January 29, 2011, no notes or debentures contain provisions requiring acceleration of payment upon a debt rating downgrade. However, the terms of approximately $3,000 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s senior notes outstanding at that date require the Company to offer to purchase such notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest in specified circumstances involving both a change of control (as defined in the applicable indenture) of the Company and the rating of the notes by specified rating agencies at a level below investment grade. The rate of interest payable in respect of $612 million in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s senior notes outstanding at January 29, 2011 decreased by .50 percent per annum to 8.375% effective in May 2010 as a result of an upgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies. The rate of interest payable in respect of 21 these senior notes outstanding at January 29, 2011 could increase by up to 1.50 percent per annum or decrease by up to .50 percent per annum from its current level in the event of one or more downgrades or upgrades of the notes by specified rating agencies. During 2010, the Company repurchased no shares of its common stock under its share repurchase program. The Company’s share repurchase program is currently suspended. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately $850 million of authorization remaining under its share repurchase program. The Company may continue or, from time to time, suspend repurchases of shares under its share repurchase program, depending on prevailing market conditions, alternate uses of capital and other factors. On February 25, 2011, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of 5 cents per share on its common stock, payable April 1, 2011 to Macy’s shareholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2011. At January 29, 2011, the Company had contractual obligations (within the scope of Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K) as follows: Obligations Due, by Period Total Less than 1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years More than 5 Years Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 451 6,702 5,082 58 1,354 2,612 38 2,320 $ 451 – 472 6 26 245 38 1,988 (millions) – $ 1,219 814 10 375 446 – 265 $ – 1,179 685 7 245 340 – 61 $ – 4,304 3,111 35 708 1,581 – 6 $18,617 $3,226 $3,129 $2,517 $9,745 “Other obligations” in the foregoing table consist primarily of merchandise purchase obligations and obligations under outsourcing arrangements, construction contracts, employment contracts, group medical/dental/ life insurance programs, energy and other supply agreements identified by the Company and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that the Company expects to settle in cash in the next year. The Company’s merchandise purchase obligations fluctuate on a seasonal basis, typically being higher in the summer and early fall and being lower in the late winter and early spring. The Company purchases a substantial portion of its merchandise inventories and other goods and services otherwise than through binding contracts. Consequently, the amounts shown as “Other obligations” in the foregoing table do not reflect the total amounts that the Company would need to spend on goods and services in order to operate its businesses in the ordinary course. The Company has not included in the contractual obligations table approximately $170 million of long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits for various tax positions taken or approximately $76 million of related accrued federal, state and local interest and penalties. These liabilities may increase or decrease over time as a result of tax examinations, and given the status of examinations, the Company cannot reliably estimate the period of any cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. The Company has included in the contractual obligations table $11 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that the Company expects to settle in cash in the next year. The Company has not included in the contractual obligation table the $220 million Pension Plan liability. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy pension funding requirements, including requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the Pension Plan’s funded status. The Pension Plan’s 22 funded status is affected by many factors including discount rates and the performance of Pension Plan assets. On March 28, 2011, the Company made a voluntary funding contribution to the Pension Plan of $225 million. The Company does not presently anticipate making any additional funding contributions to the Pension Plan during 2011, but may choose to do so in its discretion. Management believes that, with respect to the Company’s current operations, cash on hand and funds from operations, together with its credit facility and other capital resources, will be sufficient to cover the Company’s reasonably foreseeable working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements and other cash requirements in both the near term and over the longer term. The Company’s ability to generate funds from operations may be affected by numerous factors, including general economic conditions and levels of consumer confidence and demand; however, the Company expects to be able to manage its working capital levels and capital expenditure amounts so as to maintain sufficient levels of liquidity. To the extent that the Company’s cash balances from time to time exceed amounts that are needed to fund its immediate liquidity requirements, the Company will consider alternative uses of some or all of such excess cash. Depending upon its actual and anticipated sources and uses of liquidity, conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Company will from time to time consider the issuance of debt or other securities, or other possible capital markets transactions, for the purpose of raising capital which could be used to refinance current indebtedness or for other corporate purposes, and the redemption or repurchase of debt or other securities through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Management believes the department store business and other retail businesses will continue to consolidate. The Company intends from time to time to consider additional acquisitions of, and investments in, department stores and other complementary assets and companies. Acquisition transactions, if any, are expected to be financed from one or more of the following sources: cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings under existing or new credit facilities and the issuance of long-term debt or other securities, including common stock. Critical Accounting Policies Merchandise Inventories Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, inventory is segregated into departments of merchandise having similar characteristics, and is stated at its current retail selling value. Inventory retail values are converted to a cost basis by applying specific average cost factors for each merchandise department. Cost factors represent the average cost-to-retail ratio for each merchandise department based on beginning inventory and the fiscal year purchase activity. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and contains estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins. Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross profit reduction is recognized in the period the markdown is recorded. The Company receives certain allowances from various vendors in support of the merchandise it purchases for resale. The Company receives certain allowances as reimbursement for markdowns taken and/or to support the gross margins earned in connection with the sales of merchandise. These allowances are generally credited to cost of sales at the time the merchandise is sold in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, “Customer Payments and Incentives.” The Company also receives advertising allowances from more than 1,000 of its merchandise vendors pursuant to cooperative advertising programs, with some vendors participating in multiple programs. These allowances represent reimbursements by vendors of costs incurred by the Company to promote the 23 vendors’ merchandise and are netted against advertising and promotional costs when the related costs are incurred in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50. Advertising allowances in excess of costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs. The arrangements pursuant to which the Company’s vendors provide allowances, while binding, are generally informal in nature and one year or less in duration. The terms and conditions of these arrangements vary significantly from vendor to vendor and are influenced by, among other things, the type of merchandise to be supported. Although it is highly unlikely that there will be any significant reduction in historical levels of vendor support, if such a reduction were to occur, the Company could experience higher costs of sales and higher advertising expense, or reduce the amount of advertising that it uses, depending on the specific vendors involved and market conditions existing at the time. Physical inventories are generally taken within each merchandise department annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. While it is not possible to quantify the impact from each cause of shrinkage, the Company has loss prevention programs and policies that are intended to minimize shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations for substantially all merchandise categories approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period, based on historical shrinkage rates. Long-Lived Asset Impairment and Restructuring Charges The carrying values of long-lived assets are periodically reviewed by the Company whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred. For long-lived assets held for use, a potential impairment has occurred if projected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. The estimate of cash flows includes management’s assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. When a potential impairment has occurred, an impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company believes its estimated cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If estimated cash flows significantly differ in the future, the Company may be required to record asset impairment write-downs. If the Company commits to a plan to dispose of a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, estimated cash flows are revised accordingly, and the Company may be required to record an asset impairment write-down. Additionally, related liabilities arise such as severance, contractual obligations and other accruals associated with store closings from decisions to dispose of assets. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the facts and circumstances in existence for each restructuring decision. The amounts the Company will ultimately realize or disburse could differ from the amounts assumed in arriving at the asset impairment and restructuring charge recorded. The Company classifies certain long-lived assets as held for disposal by sale and ceases depreciation when the particular criteria for such classification are met, including the probable sale within one year. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, an impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less costs to sell. Such valuations include estimations of fair values and incremental direct costs to transact a sale. Goodwill and Intangible Assets The Company reviews the carrying value of its goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.” Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Company’s retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step involves estimating the fair value of 24 each reporting unit based on its estimated discounted cash flows and comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If this comparison indicates that a reporting unit’s estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, a second step is required. If applicable, the second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess. The Company uses judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. The occurrence of a change in circumstances, such as continued adverse business conditions or other economic factors, would determine the need for impairment testing between annual impairment tests. Due to deterioration in the general economic environment during 2008 (and the impact thereof on the Company’s then-most recently completed annual business plan) and the resultant decline in the Company’s market capitalization, the Company believed that an additional goodwill impairment test was required as of January 31, 2009. In performing the first step of this impairment test, the Company estimated the fair value of its reporting units by discounting their projected future cash flows to present value, and reconciling the aggregate estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the trading value of the Company’s common stock (together with an implied control premium). The Company believes that this reconciliation process represents a market participant approach to valuation. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded its fair value at January 31, 2009, which resulted in all of the Company’s reporting units failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company then undertook the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which involved, among other things, obtaining third-party appraisals of substantially all of the Company’s tangible and intangible assets. Based on the results of its goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $5,382 million ($5,083 million after income taxes) in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the 2008 goodwill impairment charge, the Macy’s retail operating division is the only reporting unit with goodwill. Based on the results of the most recent annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets completed during the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired as of May 29, 2010 and the estimated fair value of the Macy’s retail operating division substantially exceeded its carrying value. The goodwill impairment testing process involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. Estimating a reporting unit’s discounted cash flows involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments with respect to a variety of factors, including sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures, cash flows and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. Projected sales, gross margin and SG&A expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Company’s annual business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. The allocation of the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the estimated fair value of their net assets also involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments. Both the estimates of the fair value of the Company’s reporting units and the allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting units to their net assets are based on the best information available to the Company’s management as of the date of the assessment. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the goodwill impairment testing process, including with respect to the estimated future cash flows of the Company’s reporting units, the discount rate used to discount such estimated cash flows to their net present value, the reasonableness of the resultant implied control premium relative to the Company’s market capitalization, and the appraised fair value of the reporting units’ tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, could materially increase or decrease the fair value of the reporting unit and/or its net assets and, accordingly, could materially increase or decrease any related impairment charge. 25 Income Taxes Income taxes are estimated based on the tax statutes, regulations and case law of the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred income tax assets are evaluated for recoverability based on all available evidence, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. Uncertain tax positions are recognized if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Uncertain tax positions meeting the more- likely-than-not recognition threshold are then measured to determine the amount of benefit eligible for recognition in the financial statements. Each uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Uncertain tax positions are evaluated and adjusted as appropriate, while taking into account the progress of audits of various taxing jurisdictions. The Company does not anticipate that resolution of these matters will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain tax positions, provision for income taxes, and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. Although the Company believes that its judgments are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in the Company’s historical income provisions and accruals. Self-Insurance Reserves The Company, through its insurance subsidiaries, is self-insured for workers’ compensation and general liability claims up to certain maximum liability amounts. Although the amounts accrued are actuarially determined by third parties based on analysis of historical trends of losses, settlements, litigation costs and other factors, the amounts the Company will ultimately disburse could differ from such accrued amounts. Pension and Supplementary Retirement Plans The Company has a funded defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) and an unfunded defined benefit supplementary retirement plan (the “SERP”). The Company accounts for these plans in accordance with ASC Topic 715, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits.” Under ASC Topic 715, an employer recognizes the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability on the balance sheet and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. Additionally, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees’ approximate service periods. The pension expense calculation is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements. The Company anticipates that Pension and SERP expense, which was approximately $144 million in 2010, will remain comparable in 2011. 26 The Pension Protection Act of 2006 provides the funding requirements for the Pension Plan which are different from the employer’s accounting for the plan as outlined in ASC Topic 715. During 2010, the Company made funding contributions to the Pension Plan totaling approximately $825 million. On March 28, 2011, the Company made a voluntary funding contribution to the Pension Plan of $225 million. The Company does not presently anticipate making any additional funding contributions to the Pension Plan during 2011, but may choose to do so in its discretion. Management believes that, with respect to the Company’s current operations, cash on hand and funds from operations, together with available borrowing under its credit facility and other capital resources, will be sufficient to cover the Company’s Pension Plan cash requirements in both the near term and also over the longer term. At January 29, 2011, the Company had unrecognized actuarial losses of $1,116 million for the Pension Plan and $113 million for the SERP. The unrecognized losses for the Pension Plan and the SERP will be recognized as a component of pension expense in future years in accordance with ASC Topic 715, and is expected to impact 2011 Pension and SERP expense by approximately $90 million. The calculation of pension expense and pension liabilities requires the use of a number of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience may differ significantly from current expectations. The Company believes that the most critical assumptions relate to the long-term rate of return on plan assets (in the case of the Pension Plan), the discount rate used to determine the present value of projected benefit obligations and the weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels. As of January 29, 2011, the Company lowered the assumed annual long-term rate of return for the Pension Plan’s assets from 8.75% to 8.00% based on expected future returns on the portfolio. The Company develops its expected long-term rate of return assumption by evaluating input from several professional advisors taking into account the asset allocation of the portfolio and long-term asset class return expectations, as well as long-term inflation assumptions. Pension expense increases or decreases as the expected rate of return on the assets of the Pension Plan decreases or increases, respectively. Lowering the expected long-term rate of return on the Pension Plan’s assets by 0.25% (from 8.00% to 7.75%) would increase the estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $8 million and raising the expected long-term rate of return on the Pension Plan’s assets by 0.25% (from 8.00% to 8.25%) would decrease the estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $8 million. The Company discounted its future pension obligations using a rate of 5.40% at January 29, 2011, compared to 5.65% at January 30, 2010. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the Company’s Pension Plan and SERP obligations is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various maturities. Each year’s expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for Pension Plan and SERP obligations. Pension liability and future pension expense both increase or decrease as the discount rate is reduced or increased, respectively. Lowering the discount rate by 0.25% (from 5.40% to 5.15%) would increase the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $98 million and would increase estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $11 million. Increasing the discount rate by 0.25% (from 5.40% to 5.65%) would decrease the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $89 million and would decrease estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $10 million. The assumed weighted average age-graded rate of increase in future compensation levels was 4.5% at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 for the Pension Plan, and 4.9% at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 for the SERP. The Company develops its rate of compensation increase assumption on an age-graded basis based on recent experience and reflects an estimate of future compensation levels taking into account general increase levels, seniority, promotions and other factors. This assumption was revised during 2009 based on the completion of a third-party assumption study reflecting more recent experience. Pension liabilities and future pension expense both increase or decrease as the weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels is 27 increased or decreased, respectively. Increasing or decreasing the assumed weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels by 0.25% would increase or decrease the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $16 million and change estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $4 million. New Pronouncements In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, which provides amendments and requires new disclosures relating to ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” and also conforming amendments to guidance relating to ASC Topic 715, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits.” The Company adopted this guidance on January 31, 2010, except for the disclosure requirement regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which the Company adopted on January 30, 2011. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures, and the portion thereof that has been adopted did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company does not anticipate that the full adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-20, which amends various sections of ASC Topic 310, “Receivables,” relating to a company’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendment requires companies to provide disaggregated levels of disclosure by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk, how the risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 29, 2011, except as it relates to disclosures regarding activities during a reporting period, which is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 31, 2010. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures. The initial adoption did not have, and the full adoption is not expected to have, an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-28, which amends ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other,” relating to the goodwill impairment test of a reporting unit with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates that may adversely affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposures through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and is not a party to any leveraged financial instruments. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk through its borrowing activities, which are described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The majority of the Company’s borrowings are under fixed rate instruments. However, the Company, from time to time, may use interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements to help manage its exposure to interest rate movements and reduce borrowing costs. At January 29, 2011, the Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments and based on the Company’s lack of market risk sensitive instruments outstanding at January 29, 2011, the Company has determined that there was no material market risk exposure to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as of such date. 28 Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Information called for by this item is set forth in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data contained in this report and is incorporated herein by this reference. Specific financial statements and supplementary data can be found at the pages listed in the following index: INDEX Report of Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended Page F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7 F-8 29 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have carried out, as of January 29, 2011, with the participation of the Company’s management, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports the Company files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. b. Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s management conducted an assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, the Company’s management has concluded that, as of January 29, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011 and has issued an attestation report expressing an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report located on page F-3. c. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. d. Certifications The certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report. Additionally, in 2010 the Company’s Chief Executive Officer certified to the NYSE that he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. 30 Item 9B. Other Information. In January 2011, the Company determined that the performance restricted stock unit agreements issued to participants in the Company’s long-term incentive program (including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers) on March 19, 2010 contained an erroneous definition of “Net Sales” in the definition of the EBITDA Margin performance goal. On February 25, 2011, the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the Company to include language in the form of the performance restricted stock unit agreement to be used for 2011 grants, which is filed as Exhibit 10.23 to this report, correcting the definition of Net Sales in the 2010 agreement. Additional information regarding the performance restricted stock units granted to the Company’s named executive officers in fiscal 2010 is set forth under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” and “Compensation of the Named Executives for 2010” in the Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and incorporated herein by reference. 31 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. Information called for by this item is set forth under “Item 1 – Election of Directors” and “Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors – Committees of the Board” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”), and “Item 1. Business – Executive Officers of the Registrant” in this report and incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation. Information called for by this item is set forth under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” “Compensation of the Named Executives for 2010,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Information called for by this item is set forth under “Stock Ownership – Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Stock Ownership – Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. Information called for by this item is set forth under “Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors – Director Independence” and “Policy on Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Information called for by this item is set forth under “Item 2 – Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. 32 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: PART IV 1. Financial Statements: The list of financial statements required by this item is set forth in Item 8 “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and is incorporated herein by reference. 2. Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto. 3. Exhibits: Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation 3.1.1 Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2010 (the “May 18, 2010 Form 8-K”) Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 1995 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3.1 4.4 Amended and Restated By-Laws Exhibit 3.2 to the May 18, 2010 Form 8-K Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.1.1 Amended and Restated By-Laws See Exhibit 3.2 Exhibit 4(2) to May New York’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 1991 Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1991, among the Company (as successor to The May Department Stores Company (“May Delaware”)), Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc. (“Macy’s Retail”) (f/k/a The May Department Stores Company (NY) or “May New York”) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (“BNY Mellon”, successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company and as successor to The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (the “1991 Indenture”) Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1991 Indenture Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2005 (the “August 30, 2005 Form 8-K”) Indenture, dated as of December 15, 1994, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee (the “1994 Indenture”) 33 Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-88328) filed on January 9, 1995 Exhibit Number 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.5.3 4.5.4 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 1997 (the “July 1997 Form 8-K”) Exhibit 3 to the July 1997 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.14 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.16 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-34321) filed on September 11, 1997 Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 1998 Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-76795) filed on April 22, 1999 Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2001 Exhibit 10.15 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Eighth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of July 14, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee Ninth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of July 14, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee Tenth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macy’s Retail and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and as successor to The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1994 Indenture Indenture, dated as of September 10, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee (the “1997 Indenture”) First Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of February 6, 1998, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee Third Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of March 24, 1999, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee Fifth Supplemental Trust Indenture dated as of March 27, 2001, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee Seventh Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005 among the Company, Macy’s Retail and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee 34 Exhibit Number 4.5.5 4.6 4.6.1 4.7 4.7.1 4.8 4.8.1 4.8.2 4.8.3 4.8.4 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Exhibit 10.17 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-06171) filed on June 18, 1996 by May Delaware Exhibit 10.9 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-00079) filed July 21, 2004 by May Delaware Exhibit 10.10 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR (Registration No. 333-138376) filed on November 2, 2006 Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2006 Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2007 (the “March 12, 2007 Form 8-K”) Exhibit 4.2 to the March 12, 2007 Form 8-K Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2007 Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1997 Indenture Indenture, dated as of June 17, 1996, among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macy’s Retail (f/k/a May New York) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (“BNY Mellon”, successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company), as Trustee (the “1996 Indenture”) First Supplemental Indenture to the 1996 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005, by and among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macy’s Retail (f/k/a May New York) and BNY Mellon, as Trustee Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2004, among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macy’s Retail (f/k/a May New York) and BNY Mellon, as Trustee (the “2004 Indenture”) First Supplemental Indenture to the 2004 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005 among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macy’s Retail and BNY Mellon, as Trustee Indenture, dated as of November 2, 2006, by and among Macy’s Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the “2006 Indenture”) First Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated November 29, 2006, among Macy’s Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated March 12, 2007, among Macy’s Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated March 12, 2007, among Macy’s Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2007, among Macy’s Retail, as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee 35 Exhibit Number 4.8.5 10.1+ 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Fifth Supplemental Trust Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated as of June 26, 2008, among Macy’s Retail, as issuer, Macy’s, Inc., as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of dated as of December 18, 2008, among Macy’s, Inc., Macy’s Retail, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and paying agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, which includes as an exhibit the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 5, 2009, among Macy’s, Inc., Macy’s Retail, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as paying agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers Amended and Restated Guarantee Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2009, among the Company, Macy’s Retail, certain subsidiary guarantors and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as paying agent Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macy’s Retail and Banc of America Securities LLC Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macy’s Retail and Goldman, Sachs & Co. Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macy’s Retail and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2006, among the Company and Loop Capital Markets, LLC Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2008 Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 8, 2009 (the “September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q”) Exhibit 10.2 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.6 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.7 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.8 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.6 to the 2006 Form 10-K Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on November 27, 1991, as amended (the “Form 10”) 10.7 Tax Sharing Agreement 36 Exhibit Number 10.8+ 10.8.1 10.8.2+ 10.8.3 10.8.4+ 10.9+ 10.9.1+ 10.9.2+ 10.9.3 10.9.4 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Exhibit 10.3 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.17.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-13536) for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (the “2005 Form 10-K”) Exhibit 10.4 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2006 Exhibit 10.5 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.6 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.7 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.8 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the “May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q”) Exhibit 10.7 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Prime II Receivables Corporation (“Prime II”) and Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) Letter Agreement, dated August 22, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Prime II and Citibank Second Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated October 24, 2005, between the Company and Citibank Third Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated May 1, 2006, between the Company and Citibank Fourth Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated May 22, 2006, between the Company and Citibank Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Macy’s Credit and Customer Services, Inc. (“MCCS”) (f/k/a FACS Group, Inc.) and Citibank First Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated October 24, 2005, between the Company and Citibank Second Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated May 22, 2006, between the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, Macy’s West Stores, Inc. (f/k/a Macy’s Department Stores, Inc,) (“MWSI”), Bloomingdale’s, Inc. (“Bloomingdale’s”) and Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”) and Citibank Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of December 18, 2006, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s, Inc. (“Bloomingdale’s), and DSNB (as assignee of Citibank, N.A.) Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of March 22, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB 37 Exhibit Number 10.9.5 10.9.6 10.9.7 10.9.8+ 10.9.9+ 10.9.10+ 10.9.11+ 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of April 6, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of June 1, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Restated Third Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated May 31, 2008 and effective as of February 3, 2008, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Fourth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of August 1, 2008, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB. Fifth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2009, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Sixth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2009, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Seventh Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of February 26, 2010, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdale’s and DSNB Exhibit 10.8 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.9 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.10 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.9 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.10 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.11 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q Exhibit 10.9.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-13536) for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 1995 Executive Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of June 1, 2007 (the “1995 Plan”) * Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the “2008 Form 10-K”) 1992 Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated as of February 3, 2007 * Appendix B to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated April 4, 2007 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of June 1, 2007 * Exhibit 10.13 to the 2008 Form 10-K Form of Indemnification Agreement * Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10 Employment Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2007, between Terry J. Lundgren and the Company (the “Lundgren Employment Agreement”) * Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2007 10.14.1 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 19, 2010, between Terry J. Lundgren and the Company Exhibit 10.5 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K (the “March 25, 2010 Form 8-K”) * 38 Exhibit Number 10.15 10.16 10.17 10. 18 10.19 10.20 10.20.1 10.20.2 10.20.3 10.21 10.22 10.22.1 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Thomas L. Cole and Macy’s Corporate Services, Inc. * Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Janet Grove and Macy’s Merchandising Group, Inc. * Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Karen M. Hoguet and Macy’s Corporate Services, Inc. * Form of Employment Agreement for Executives and Key Employees * Executive Severance Plan, effective November 1, 2009 * Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1995 Plan (for Executives and Key Employees) * Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1995 Plan (for Executives and Key Employees), as amended * Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan * Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (for Executives and Key Employees) * Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2007, by and between the Company and Terry Lundgren * Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan * Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (Founders Award) * Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan * 39 Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2008 (the “April 22, 2008 Form 8-K”) Exhibit 10.2 to the April 22, 2008 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.3 to the April 22, 2008 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.31 the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-10951) for fiscal year ended January 29, 1994 Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 7, 2009 (the “December 7, 2009 Form 10-Q”) Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 25, 2005 Exhibit 10.33.1 to the 2005 Form 10-K Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on From 8-K (File No. 001-00079) filed on March 23, 2005 by May Delaware (the “March 23, 2005 Form 8-K”) Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2007 Exhibit 10.4 to the March 23, 2005 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.3 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 8-K dated March 24, 2009 Exhibit 10.4 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K Exhibit 10.29 to the 2008 Form 10-K Exhibit Number 10.27 10.28 10.28.1 10.28.2 10.28.3 10.28.4 10.28.5 10.28.6 10.28.7 10.29 10.30 10.30.1 10.31 10.32 10.33 21 23 24 31.1 Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Executive Deferred Compensation Plan * Exhibit 10.30 to the 2008 Form 10-K Exhibit 10.31 to the 2008 Form 10-K Macy’s, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the “Plan”) (amending and restating the Macy’s, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan and The May Department Stores Company Profit Sharing Plan), effective as of September 1, 2008 * First Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plan’s 2009 plan year, effective as of January 1, 2009 * Second Amendment to the Plan regarding certain rollover requirements added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, restated effective as of January 1, 2008 * Third Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plan’s 2010 plan year, effective January 1, 2010 * Fourth Amendment to the Plan regarding deferral percentage and average actual contribution limits, effective January 1, 2010 * Fifth Amendment to the Plan regarding the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008, effective as of January 1, 2008 * Sixth Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plan’s plan year on or after January 1, 2011, effective as of January 1, 2011 * Seventh Amendment to the Plan regarding name change of the Plan effective as of April 1, 2011 * Director Deferred Compensation Plan * Exhibit 10.33 to the 2008 Form 10-K Stock Credit Plan for 2006 – 2007 of Federated Department Stores, Inc. * Stock Credit Plan for 2008 – 2009 of Macy’s, Inc. (as amended as of August 22, 2008) * Exhibit 10.43 to the 2005 Form 10-K Exhibit 10.1 to the August 2, 2008 Form 10-Q Macy’s, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * Appendix B to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated April 1, 2009 Exhibit 10.2 to the December 7, 2009 Form 10-Q Change in Control Plan, effective November 1, 2009 * Time Sharing Agreement between Macy’s, Inc. and Terry J. Lundgren, dated March 25, 2011 * Subsidiaries Consent of KPMG LLP Powers of Attorney Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) 40 Exhibit Number 31.2 32.1 32.2 101** Description Document if Incorporated by Reference Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications by Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certifications by Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act The following financial statements from Macy’s, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011, filed on March 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. + Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The confidential portions have been provided to the SEC. Constitutes a compensatory plan or arrangement. * ** As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 41 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES MACY’S, INC. By: /s/ DENNIS J. BRODERICK Dennis J. Broderick Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Date: March 30, 2011 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 30, 2011. Signature * Terry J. Lundgren * Karen M. Hoguet * Joel A. Belsky * Stephen F. Bollenbach * Deirdre Connelly * Meyer Feldberg * Sara Levinson * Joseph Neubauer * Joseph A. Pichler * Joyce M. Roché * Craig E. Weatherup * Marna C. Whittington Title Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Director Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) Executive Vice President and Controller (principal accounting officer) Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director * The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does sign and execute this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to the Powers of Attorney executed by the above-named officers and directors and filed herewith. By: /s/ DENNIS J. BRODERICK Dennis J. Broderick Attorney-in-Fact 42 INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended Page F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, and January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7 F-8 F-1 REPORT OF MANAGEMENT To the Shareholders of Macy’s, Inc.: The integrity and consistency of the Consolidated Financial Statements of Macy’s, Inc. and subsidiaries, which were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, are the responsibility of management and properly include some amounts that are based upon estimates and judgments. The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls, which is supported by a program of internal audits with appropriate management follow-up action, to provide reasonable assurance, at appropriate cost, that the Company’s assets are protected and transactions are properly recorded. Additionally, the integrity of the financial accounting system is based on careful selection and training of qualified personnel, organizational arrangements which provide for appropriate division of responsibilities and communication of established written policies and procedures. The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and has issued Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been audited by KPMG LLP. Their report expresses their opinion as to the fair presentation, in all material respects, of the financial statements and is based upon their independent audits. The Audit Committee, composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with KPMG LLP, the internal auditors and representatives of management to discuss auditing and financial reporting matters. In addition, KPMG LLP and the Company’s internal auditors meet periodically with the Audit Committee without management representatives present and have free access to the Audit Committee at any time. The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, which is subject to shareholder approval, and the general oversight review of management’s discharge of its responsibilities with respect to the matters referred to above. Terry J. Lundgren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Karen M. Hoguet Chief Financial Officer Joel A. Belsky Executive Vice President and Controller F-2 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders Macy’s, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Macy’s, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2011. We also have audited Macy’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Macy’s, Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A(b), “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Macy’s, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, Macy’s, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. /s/ KPMG LLP Cincinnati, Ohio March 30, 2011 F-3 MACY’S, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (millions, except per share data) 2010 2009 2008 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,003 (14,824) $ 23,489 (13,973) $ 24,892 (15,009) Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal, state and local income tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,179 (8,260) (25) – 1,894 (579) 5 1,320 (473) 9,516 (8,062) (391) – 1,063 (562) 6 507 (178) 9,883 (8,481) (398) (5,382) (4,378) (588) 28 (4,938) 163 $ $ $ 847 2.00 1.98 $ $ $ 329 $ (4,775) .78 $ (11.34) .78 $ (11.34) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. F-4 MACY’S, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (millions) January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 Current Assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and Equipment – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Intangible Assets – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,464 392 4,758 285 6,899 8,813 3,743 637 539 $ 1,686 358 4,615 223 6,882 9,507 3,743 678 490 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,631 $21,300 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities: Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ Equity: Common stock (423.3 and 420.8 shares outstanding) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 454 1,421 2,644 182 364 5,065 6,971 1,245 1,820 5 5,696 2,990 (2,431) (730) 5,530 $ 242 1,312 2,626 68 214 4,462 8,456 1,132 2,597 5 5,689 2,227 (2,515) (753) 4,653 Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,631 $21,300 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. F-5 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (millions) MACY’S, INC. Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Equity Treasury Stock Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Shareholders’ Equity $5,609 $ 7,032 $(2,557) $(182) $ 9,907 Balance at February 2, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative effect of change in methodology of deferred state income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at February 2, 2008, as revised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $183 million . . . . . Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of income tax effect of $11 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassifications to net loss: Realized loss on marketable securities, net of income tax effect of $5 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $1 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service credit on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $1 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock dividends ($.5275 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $166 million . . . . . Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income tax effect of $3 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassifications to net income: Net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $3 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service credit on post employment benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $1 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock dividends ($.20 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at January 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $4 million . . . . . . . Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income tax effect of $3 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassifications to net income: Net actuarial loss on postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $23 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service credit on post employment benefit plans, net of income tax effect of $1 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock dividends ($.20 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5 5 5,609 (54) 6,978 (4,775) (2,557) (182) 61 (7) 5 5,663 50 (24) 5 5,689 (221) 1,982 329 (84) 2,227 847 (294) (17) 7 1 (1) (1) 13 1 (2,544) (486) (266) 5 (4) (2) (1) 29 1 (2,515) (753) (17) 5 36 (1) (84) 47 (40) (1) 82 3 (54) 9,853 (4,775) (294) (17) 7 1 (1) (5,079) (221) (1) 61 6 1 4,620 329 (266) 5 (4) (2) 62 (84) (1) 50 5 1 4,653 847 (17) 5 36 (1) 870 (84) (1) 47 42 3 Balance at January 29, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5 $5,696 $ 2,990 $(2,431) $(730) $ 5,530 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. F-6 MACY’S, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (millions) 2010 2009 2008 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 847 $ 329 $(4,775) Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of financing costs and premium on acquired debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in supplies and prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in other assets not separately identified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in merchandise accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities not separately identified . . Increase (decrease) in current income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in other liabilities not separately identified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 – 1,150 66 (25) (51) (143) (10) 2 91 (45) 115 241 (757) 391 – 1,210 76 (23) 7 154 3 (16) 29 (201) 40 123 (372) 398 5,382 1,278 43 (27) (1) 291 (7) 1 (90) (228) (146) (315) 62 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,506 1,750 1,866 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capitalized software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from property insurance claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Disposition of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used by investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Debt issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt repaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (339) (166) 6 74 (40) (465) – – (1,245) (84) 24 (1) 43 (355) (105) 26 60 (3) (377) – – (966) (84) (29) (1) 8 Net cash used by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,263) (1,072) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (222) 1,686 301 1,385 (761) (136) 68 38 (1) (792) 650 (18) (666) (221) (116) (1) 7 (365) 709 676 Cash and cash equivalents end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,464 $ 1,686 $ 1,385 Supplemental cash flow information: Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes paid (net of refunds received) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 627 5 108 $ 601 9 35 $ 642 26 323 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. F-7 MACY’S, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Macy’s, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico. As of January 29, 2011, the Company’s operations were conducted through Macy’s, macys.com, Bloomingdale’s, bloomingdales.com and Bloomingdale’s Outlet, which are aggregated into one reporting segment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” The metrics used by management to assess the performance of the Company’s operating divisions include sales trends, gross margin rates, expense rates, and rates of earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). The Company’s operating divisions have historically had similar economic characteristics and are expected to have similar economic characteristics and long-term financial performance in future periods. For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the following merchandise constituted the following percentages of sales: Feminine Accessories, Intimate Apparel, Shoes and Cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Feminine Apparel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Men’s and Children’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Home/Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 36% 36% 36% 26 26 22 23 16 15 27 22 15 100% 100% 100% The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 ended on January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. References to years in the Consolidated Financial Statements relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company from time to time invests in companies engaged in complementary businesses. Investments in companies in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for by the equity method. All marketable equity and debt securities held by the Company are accounted for under ASC Topic 320, “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” with unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities being included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income tax effect. All other investments are carried at cost. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainties, which may result in actual amounts differing from reported amounts. Certain reclassifications were made to prior years’ amounts to conform with the classifications of such amounts for the most recent year. F-8 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Net sales include merchandise sales, leased department income and shipping and handling fees. In 2010, the Company began including sales of private brand goods directly to third party retailers and sales of excess inventory to third parties in net sales. These items were previously reported, net of the related cost of sales, in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”). This change in presentation had an immaterial impact on reported net sales, does not impact comparable store sales, net income (loss) or diluted earnings (loss) per share, and was not applied retroactively to annual periods prior to fiscal 2010. The Company licenses third parties to operate certain departments in its stores. The Company receives commissions from these licensed departments based on a percentage of net sales. Commissions are recognized as income at the time merchandise is sold to customers. Sales taxes collected from customers are not considered revenue and are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities until remitted to the taxing authorities. Cost of sales consists of the cost of merchandise, including inbound freight, and shipping and handling costs. Sales of merchandise are recorded at the time of delivery and reported net of merchandise returns. An estimated allowance for future sales returns is recorded and cost of sales is adjusted accordingly. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents also includes credit card sales transactions that are settled early in the following period and amounted to $104 million at January 29, 2011 and $98 million at January 30, 2010. In connection with the sale of the Company’s credit assets, the Company and Citibank, N.A. entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the “Program Agreement”) (see Note 4, “Receivables”). Income earned under the Program Agreement is treated as a reduction of SG&A expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under the Program Agreement, Citibank offers proprietary and non-proprietary credit to the Company’s customers through previously existing and newly opened accounts. The Company maintains customer loyalty programs in which customers are awarded certificates based on their spending. Upon reaching certain levels of qualified spending, customers automatically receive certificates to apply toward future purchases. The Company recognizes the estimated net amount of the certificates that will be earned and redeemed as a reduction to net sales. Merchandise inventories are valued at lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, inventory is segregated into departments of merchandise having similar characteristics, and is stated at its current retail selling value. Inventory retail values are converted to a cost basis by applying specific average cost factors for each merchandise department. Cost factors represent the average cost-to-retail ratio for each merchandise department based on beginning inventory and the fiscal year purchase activity. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins. Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross margin reduction is recognized in the period the markdown is recorded. Physical inventories are generally taken within each merchandise department annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. While it is not possible to quantify the impact from each cause of shrinkage, the Company has loss prevention programs and policies that F-9 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) are intended to minimize shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations for substantially all merchandise categories approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period, based on historical shrinkage rates. The Company receives certain allowances from various vendors in support of the merchandise it purchases for resale. The Company receives certain allowances as reimbursement for markdowns taken and/or to support the gross margins earned in connection with the sales of merchandise. These allowances are generally credited to cost of sales at the time the merchandise is sold in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, “Customer Payments and Incentives.” The Company also receives advertising allowances from more than 1,000 of its merchandise vendors pursuant to cooperative advertising programs, with some vendors participating in multiple programs. These allowances represent reimbursements by vendors of costs incurred by the Company to promote the vendors’ merchandise and are netted against advertising and promotional costs when the related costs are incurred in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50. Advertising allowances in excess of costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs and, ultimately, through cost of sales when the merchandise is sold. Advertising and promotional costs, net of cooperative advertising allowances, amounted to $1,072 million for 2010, $1,087 million for 2009 and $1,239 million for 2008. Cooperative advertising allowances that offset advertising and promotional costs were approximately $345 million for 2010, $298 million for 2009 and $372 million for 2008. Department store non-direct response advertising and promotional costs are expensed either as incurred or the first time the advertising occurs. Direct response advertising and promotional costs are deferred and expensed over the period during which the sales are expected to occur, generally one to four months. The arrangements pursuant to which the Company’s vendors provide allowances, while binding, are generally informal in nature and one year or less in duration. The terms and conditions of these arrangements vary significantly from vendor to vendor and are influenced by, among other things, the type of merchandise to be supported. Depreciation of owned properties is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over the estimated asset lives, which range from fifteen to fifty years for buildings and building equipment and three to fifteen years for fixtures and equipment. Real estate taxes and interest on construction in progress and land under development are capitalized. Amounts capitalized are amortized over the estimated lives of the related depreciable assets. The Company receives contributions from developers and merchandise vendors to fund building improvement and the construction of vendor shops. Such contributions are netted against the capital expenditures. Buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, beginning on the date the asset is put into use. The Company receives contributions from landlords to fund buildings and leasehold improvements. Such contributions are recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease term. The Company recognizes operating lease minimum rentals on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Executory costs such as real estate taxes and maintenance, and contingent rentals such as those based on a percentage of sales are recognized as incurred. The lease term, which includes all renewal periods that are considered to be reasonably assured, begins on the date the Company has access to the leased property. F-10 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The carrying value of long-lived assets is periodically reviewed by the Company whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred. For long-lived assets held for use, a potential impairment has occurred if projected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. The estimate of cash flows includes management’s assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. When a potential impairment has occurred, an impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company believes its estimated cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If estimated cash flows significantly differ in the future, the Company may be required to record asset impairment write-downs. If the Company commits to a plan to dispose of a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, estimated cash flows are revised accordingly, and the Company may be required to record an asset impairment write-down. Additionally, related liabilities arise such as severance, contractual obligations and other accruals associated with store closings from decisions to dispose of assets. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the facts and circumstances in existence for each restructuring decision. The amounts the Company will ultimately realize or disburse could differ from the amounts assumed in arriving at the asset impairment and restructuring charge recorded. The Company classifies certain long-lived assets as held for disposal by sale and ceases depreciation when the particular criteria for such classification are met, including the probable sale within one year. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, an impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less costs to sell. Such valuations include estimations of fair values and incremental direct costs to transact a sale. The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-20 “Goodwill.” Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Company’s retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The Company estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. The reporting unit’s discounted cash flows require significant management judgment with respect to sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. The projected sales, gross margin and SG&A expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Company’s annual business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value in the first step, a second step is performed, in which the reporting unit’s goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. The second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit derived in the first step to the fair value of the reporting unit’s net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess. The Company capitalizes purchased and internally developed software and amortizes such costs to expense on a straight-line basis over two to five years. Capitalized software is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. F-11 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Historically, the Company offered both expiring and non-expiring gift cards to its customers. At the time gift cards are sold, no revenue is recognized; rather, the Company records an accrued liability to customers. The liability is relieved and revenue is recognized equal to the amount redeemed at the time gift cards are redeemed for merchandise. The Company records income from unredeemed gift cards (breakage) as a reduction of SG&A expenses. For expiring gift cards, income is recorded at the end of two years (expiration date) when there is no longer a legal obligation. For non-expiring gift cards, income is recorded in proportion and over the time period gift cards are actually redeemed. At least three years of historical data, updated annually, is used to determine actual redemption patterns. Since February 2, 2008, the Company sells only non-expiring gift cards. The Company, through its insurance subsidiaries, is self-insured for workers compensation and general liability claims up to certain maximum liability amounts. Although the amounts accrued are actuarially determined based on analysis of historical trends of losses, settlements, litigation costs and other factors, the amounts the Company will ultimately disburse could differ from such accrued amounts. The Company, through its actuaries, utilizes assumptions when estimating the liabilities for pension and other employee benefit plans. These assumptions, where applicable, include the discount rates used to determine the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations, the rate of increase in future compensation levels, the long-term rate of return on assets and the growth in health care costs. The cost of these benefits is recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements over an employee’s term of service with the Company, and the accrued benefits are reported in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as appropriate. Financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. The Company records derivative transactions according to the provisions of ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging,” which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measurement of those instruments at fair value. The Company makes limited use of derivative financial instruments. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and is not a party to any leveraged financial instruments. On the date that the Company enters into a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative instrument as either a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or as a free-standing derivative instrument, each of which would receive different accounting treatment. Prior to entering into a hedge transaction, the F-12 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Company formally documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Derivative instruments that the Company may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements and Treasury lock agreements. At January 29, 2011, the Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments. The Company records stock-based compensation expense according to the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC Topic 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under the provisions of ASC Topic 718, the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments and the amortization method for compensation cost. See Note 13, “Stock Based Compensation,” for further information. In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, which provides amendments and requires new disclosures relating to ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” and also conforming amendments to guidance relating to ASC Topic 715, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits.” The Company adopted this guidance on January 31, 2010, except for the disclosure requirement regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which the Company adopted on January 30, 2011. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures, and the portion thereof that has been adopted did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company does not anticipate that the full adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-20, which amends various sections of ASC Topic 310, “Receivables,” relating to a company’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendment requires companies to provide disaggregated levels of disclosure by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk, how the risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 29, 2011, except as it relates to disclosures regarding activities during a reporting period, which is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 31, 2010. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures. The initial adoption did not have, and the full adoption is not expected to have, an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-28, which amends ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other,” relating to the goodwill impairment test of a reporting unit with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. F-13 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 2. Impairments, Store Closing Costs and Division Consolidation Costs Impairments, store closing costs, and division consolidation costs consist of the following: 2010 2009 2008 (millions) Impairments: Properties held and used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquired indefinite-lived private brand tradenames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18 – – $115 – – $136 63 12 Store closing costs: Severance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 – 2 4 270 4 7 176 $25 $391 $398 Long-lived assets held for use are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability of long- lived assets is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of those assets in operation. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. As a result of the Company’s projected undiscounted future cash flows related to certain store locations being less than the carrying value of those assets, the Company recorded the impairment charges reflected in the table above relating to properties held and used, including properties that were the subject of announced store closings. The fair values of these locations were calculated based on the projected cash flows and an estimated risk-adjusted rate of return that would be used by market participants in valuing these assets or based on prices of similar assets. During January 2011, the Company announced the closure of three underperforming Macy’s stores; during January 2010, the Company announced the closure of five underperforming Macy’s stores; and during January 2009, the Company announced the closure of eleven underperforming Macy’s stores. In connection with these announcements and the plans to dispose of these locations, the Company incurred severance costs and other costs related to lease obligations and other store liabilities. For 2010, these costs also included a loss on the sale of one property to be disposed. The following table shows for 2010, 2009 and 2008, the beginning and ending balance of, and the activity associated with, the severance accruals established in connection with announced store closings: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charged to store closing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (millions) $ 4 2 (4) $ 2 1 (2) Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 $ 2 $ – 4 – $ 4 2010 2009 2008 The Company expects to pay out the 2010 accrued severance costs, which are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, prior to April 30, 2011. F-14 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) In February 2008, the Company began a localization initiative called “My Macy’s.” This initiative was intended to strengthen local market focus and enhance selling service in an effort to both accelerate same-store sales growth and reduce expenses. To maximize the results from My Macy’s, the Company took action, initially in selected markets, that: concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the “span of control” over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. In combination with the localization initiative, the Company consolidated the Minneapolis-based Macy’s North organization into New York-based Macy’s East, the St. Louis- based Macy’s Midwest organization into Atlanta-based Macy’s South and the Seattle-based Macy’s Northwest organization into San Francisco based Macy’s West. The Atlanta-based division was renamed Macy’s Central. In February 2009, the Company announced the expansion of the My Macy’s localization initiative across the country. As My Macy’s was rolled out nationally to new local markets in 2009, the Company’s Macy’s branded stores were reorganized into a unified operating structure, through division consolidations, to support the Macy’s business. Division central office organizations were eliminated in New York-based Macy’s East, San Francisco-based Macy’s West, Atlanta-based Macy’s Central and Miami-based Macy’s Florida. The New York- based Macy’s Home Store and Macy’s Corporate Marketing divisions no longer exist as separate entities. Home Store functions were integrated into the Macy’s national merchandising, merchandise planning, stores and marketing organizations. Macy’s Corporate Marketing was integrated into the new unified marketing organization. The New York-based Macy’s Merchandising Group was refocused solely on the design, development and marketing of the Macy’s family of private brands. The costs and expenses associated with the division consolidations and localization initiatives consisted primarily of severance costs and other human resource-related costs. The following table shows for 2010, 2009 and 2008, the beginning and ending balance of, and the activity associated with, the severance accruals established in connection with the division consolidations and localization initiatives: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charged to division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 (millions) $ 30 166 (127) $ 69 – (69) $ – 99 (69) Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – $ 69 $ 30 The Company performed both an annual and an interim impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during 2008 (see Note 3, “Goodwill Impairment Charges”). As a result of the then-current economic environment and expectations regarding future operating performance of the Karen Scott, John Ashford and Frango private brand tradenames, it was determined that the carrying values exceeded the estimated fair values, which were based on discounted cash flows, and management concluded that asset impairment charges were required. The Company accounts for its investment in available-for-sale marketable equity securities with unrealized gains and losses being included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. During 2008, based on the then-current economic environment, it was determined that the carrying value of certain marketable equity securities exceeded the current fair value on an “other-than-temporary” basis, and the previously unrecognized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income were reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Operations. F-15 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 3. Goodwill Impairment Charges The Company reviews the carrying value of its goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.” Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Company’s retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step involves estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on its estimated discounted cash flows and comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If this comparison indicates that a reporting unit’s estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, a second step is required. If applicable, the second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess. The Company uses judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. The occurrence of a change in circumstances, such as continued adverse business conditions or other economic factors, would determine the need for impairment testing between annual impairment tests. Due to deterioration in the general economic environment in 2008 (and the impact thereof on the Company’s then- most recently completed annual business plan) and the resultant decline in the Company’s market capitalization, the Company believed that an additional goodwill impairment test was required as of January 31, 2009. In performing the first step of this impairment test, the Company estimated the fair value of its reporting units by discounting their projected future cash flows to present value, and reconciling the aggregate estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the trading value of the Company’s common stock (together with an implied control premium). The Company believes that this reconciliation process represents a market participant approach to valuation. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded its fair value at January 31, 2009, which resulted in all of the Company’s reporting units failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company then undertook the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which involved, among other things, obtaining third-party appraisals of substantially all of the Company’s tangible and intangible assets. Based on the results of its goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $5,382 million ($5,083 million after income taxes) in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the 2008 goodwill impairment charge, Macy’s is the only retail operating division with goodwill. Based on the results of the most recent annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets completed during the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired as of May 29, 2010 and the estimated fair value of the Macy’s reporting unit substantially exceeded its carrying value. The goodwill impairment testing process involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. Estimating a reporting unit’s discounted cash flows involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments with respect to a variety of factors, including sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures, cash flows and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. Projected sales, gross margin and expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Company’s business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. The allocation of the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the estimated fair value of their net assets also involves the use of significant assumptions, F-16 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) estimates and judgments. Both the estimates of the fair value of the Company’s reporting units and the allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting units to their net assets are based on the best information available to the Company’s management as of the date of the assessment. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the goodwill impairment testing process, including with respect to the estimated future cash flows of the Company’s reporting units, the discount rate used to discount such estimated cash flows to their net present value, the reasonableness of the resultant implied control premium relative to the Company’s market capitalization, and the appraised fair value of the reporting units’ tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, could materially increase or decrease the fair value of the reporting unit and/or its net assets and, accordingly, could materially increase or decrease any related impairment charge. 4. Receivables Receivables were $392 million at January 29, 2011, compared to $358 million at January 30, 2010. In connection with the sales of credit card accounts and related receivable balances, the Company and Citibank entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the “Program Agreement”) with an initial term of 10 years expiring on July 17, 2016 and, unless terminated by either party as of the expiration of the initial term, an additional renewal term of three years. The Program Agreement provides for, among other things, (i) the ownership by Citibank of the accounts purchased by Citibank, (ii) the ownership by Citibank of new accounts opened by the Company’s customers, (iii) the provision of credit by Citibank to the holders of the credit cards associated with the foregoing accounts, (iv) the servicing of the foregoing accounts, and (v) the allocation between Citibank and the Company of the economic benefits and burdens associated with the foregoing and other aspects of the alliance. Pursuant to the Program Agreement, the Company continues to provide certain servicing functions related to the accounts and related receivables owned by Citibank and receives compensation from Citibank for these services. The amounts earned under the Program Agreement related to the servicing functions are deemed adequate compensation and, accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts received under the Program Agreement were $528 million for 2010, $525 million for 2009 and $594 million for 2008, and are treated as reductions of SG&A expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s earnings from credit operations, net of servicing expenses, were $332 million for 2010, $323 million for 2009, and $372 million for 2008. 5. Inventories Merchandise inventories were $4,758 million at January 29, 2011, compared to $4,615 million at January 30, 2010. At these dates, the cost of inventories using the LIFO method approximated the cost of such inventories using the FIFO method. The application of the LIFO method did not impact cost of sales for 2010, 2009 or 2008. F-17 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 6. Properties and Leases Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings on owned land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixtures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased properties under capitalized leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) $ 1,702 5,148 2,227 5,752 33 14,862 6,049 $ 1,719 5,160 2,232 6,129 49 15,289 5,782 $ 8,813 $ 9,507 In connection with various shopping center agreements, the Company is obligated to operate certain stores within the centers for periods of up to twenty years. Some of these agreements require that the stores be operated under a particular name. The Company leases a portion of the real estate and personal property used in its operations. Most leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes, maintenance and other executory costs; some also require additional payments based on percentages of sales and some contain purchase options. Certain of the Company’s real estate leases have terms that extend for significant numbers of years and provide for rental rates that increase or decrease over time. In addition, certain of these leases contain covenants that restrict the ability of the tenant (typically a subsidiary of the Company) to take specified actions (including the payment of dividends or other amounts on account of its capital stock) unless the tenant satisfies certain financial tests. Minimum rental commitments (excluding executory costs) at January 29, 2011, for noncancellable leases are: Capitalized Leases Operating Leases Total (millions) Fiscal year: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6 6 4 4 3 35 58 25 Present value of net minimum capitalized lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $33 $ 245 233 213 190 150 1,581 $ 251 239 217 194 153 1,616 $2,612 $2,670 Capitalized leases are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as property and equipment while the related obligation is included in short-term ($3 million) and long-term ($30 million) debt. Amortization of assets subject to capitalized leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense. Total minimum lease payments shown above have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of approximately $80 million on operating leases. F-18 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The Company is a guarantor with respect to certain lease obligations associated with The May Department Stores Company and previously disposed subsidiaries or businesses. The leases, one of which includes potential extensions to 2070, have future minimum lease payments aggregating approximately $389 million and are offset by payments from existing tenants and subtenants. In addition, the Company is liable for other expenses related to the above leases, such as property taxes and common area maintenance, which are also payable by existing tenants and subtenants. Potential liabilities related to these guarantees are subject to certain defenses by the Company. The Company believes that the risk of significant loss from the guarantees of these lease obligations is remote. Rental expense consists of: Real estate (excluding executory costs) Capitalized leases – 2010 2009 2008 (millions) Contingent rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ – $ – $ 1 Operating leases – Minimum rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingent rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 16 250 230 15 245 230 16 247 Less income from subleases – Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (15) (16) (15) $235 $229 $232 Personal property – Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10 $ 12 $ 19 Included as a reduction to the expense above is deferred rent amortization of $7 million, $7 million and $6 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to contributions received from landlords. F-19 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The following summarizes the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets: January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) Non-amortizing intangible assets Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated impairment losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,125 (5,382) Tradenames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,743 414 $ 9,125 (5,382) 3,743 414 $ 4,157 $ 4,157 Amortizing intangible assets Favorable leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Accumulated amortization Favorable leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 188 438 (113) (102) (215) $ 256 188 444 (97) (83) (180) $ 223 $ 264 During 2008, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge based on the results of goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009. See Note 3, “Goodwill Impairment Charges,” for further information. Also during 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge associated with acquired indefinite-lived private brand tradenames. See Note 2, “Impairments, Store Closing Costs and Division Consolidation Costs,” for further information. Intangible amortization expense amounted to $41 million for 2010, $41 million for 2009 and $42 million for 2008. Future estimated intangible amortization expense is shown below: Fiscal year: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39 37 34 31 21 (millions) Favorable lease intangible assets are being amortized over their respective lease terms (weighted average life of approximately twelve years) and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years. F-20 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 8. Financing The Company’s debt is as follows: January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) Short-term debt: 6.625% Senior notes due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.625% Senior debentures due 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5% Senior notes due 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease and current portion of other long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt: 5.9% Senior notes due 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.35% Senior notes due 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.875% Senior notes due 2015 * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.375% Senior notes due 2037 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.75% Senior notes due 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9% Senior debentures due 2029 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.7% Senior debentures due 2034 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.65% Senior debentures due 2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0% Senior debentures due 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.875% Senior notes due 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9% Senior debentures due 2032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.7% Senior debentures due 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.0% Senior debentures due 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.79% Senior debentures due 2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.625% Senior debentures due 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.875% Senior debentures due 2036 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5% Senior debentures due 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.125% Senior debentures due 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.75% Senior debentures due 2029 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.5% amortizing debentures due 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5% Senior debentures due 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.25% Senior debentures due 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6% Senior debentures due 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.75% amortizing debentures due 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.875% Senior debentures due 2030 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.625% Senior notes due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premium on acquired debt, using an effective interest yield of 4.854% to 6.165% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease and other long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 330 109 – – 15 $ 454 $ 977 616 612 500 453 400 400 300 300 300 298 250 200 173 165 123 109 108 100 76 61 37 36 33 24 20 18 – – 239 43 $ – – 150 76 16 $ 242 $1,100 1,100 650 500 500 400 400 300 300 300 350 250 200 200 165 125 125 108 100 76 61 41 36 33 24 22 18 500 150 275 47 * The rate of interest payable in respect of these senior notes was increased by one percent per annum to 8.875% in April 2009 as a result of a downgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies and was decreased by 0.50 percent per annum to 8.375% effective in May 2010 as a result of an upgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies. The rate of interest payable in respect of these senior notes could increase by up to 1.50 percent per annum or decrease by up to 0.50 percent per annum from its current level in the event of one or more downgrades or upgrades of the notes by specified rating agencies. $6,971 $8,456 F-21 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Interest expense is as follows: Interest on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Premium on early retirement of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of debt premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest on capitalized leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Less interest capitalized on construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 (millions) $587 – (33) 10 3 $535 66 (31) 11 3 584 5 567 5 $621 – (34) 7 5 599 11 $579 $562 $588 Future maturities of long-term debt, other than capitalized leases and premium on acquired debt, are shown below: Fiscal year: 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (millions) $1,098 121 461 718 1,105 3,199 During 2010, consistent with its strategy to reduce indebtedness, the Company used approximately $1,067 million of cash to repurchase approximately $1,000 million of indebtedness prior to maturity. In connection with these repurchases, the Company recognized additional interest expense of approximately $66 million in 2010 due to the expenses associated with the early retirement of this debt. In 2009, the Company completed a cash tender offer pursuant to which it purchased approximately $680 million of its outstanding debt for aggregate consideration, including accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $686 million. On June 23, 2008, the Company issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2015. The net proceeds of the debt issuance were used for the repayment of amounts due on debt maturing in 2008. F-22 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The following table shows the detail of debt repayments: 10.625% Senior debentures due 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5% Senior notes due 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.625% Senior notes due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.35% Senior notes due 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.0% Senior debentures due 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.875% Senior notes due 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.625% Senior debentures due 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.75% Senior notes due 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.875% Senior notes due 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.90% Senior notes due 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45% Senior debentures due 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8% Senior notes due 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3% Senior notes due 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.625% Senior notes due 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.95% Senior notes due 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.5% amortizing debentures due 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.75% amortizing debentures due 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital leases and other obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 (millions) – $ – – – – – – – – – – – 600 350 – – 4 2 10 $ 150 76 170 41 484 27 52 16 47 38 123 2 – – – – 4 2 13 $ – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 500 150 4 2 10 $1,245 $966 $666 The following summarizes certain components of the Company’s debt: Bank Credit Agreement The Company is a party to a credit agreement with certain financial institutions providing for revolving credit borrowings and letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000 million (which amount may be increased to $2,500 million at the option of the Company, subject to the willingness of existing or new lenders to provide commitments for such additional financing) outstanding at any particular time. This credit agreement is set to expire August 30, 2012. As of January 29, 2011, and January 30, 2010, there were no revolving credit loans outstanding under the credit agreement. However, there were less than $1 million and approximately $52 million, respectively, of standby letters of credit outstanding at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. There were no borrowings under this agreement throughout all of 2010 and 2009. Revolving loans under the credit agreement bear interest based on various published rates. This agreement, which is an obligation of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macy’s, Inc. (“Parent”), is not secured. However, Parent and each direct and indirect subsidiary of such wholly owned subsidiary of Macy’s, Inc. have fully and unconditionally guaranteed this obligation, subject to specified limitations. The Company’s interest coverage ratio for 2010 was 5.64 and its leverage ratio at January 29, 2011 was 2.34, in each case as calculated in accordance with the credit agreement. The credit agreement requires the F-23 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Company to maintain a specified interest coverage ratio for the latest four quarters of no less than 3.25 and a specified leverage ratio as of and for the latest four quarters of no more than 4.50. The interest coverage ratio is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) over net interest expense and the leverage ratio is defined as debt over EBITDA. For purposes of these calculations EBITDA is calculated as net income plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash impairment of goodwill, intangibles and real estate, non-recurring cash charges not to exceed in the aggregate $500 million from the date of the amended agreement and extraordinary losses less interest income and non-recurring or extraordinary gains. Debt and net interest are adjusted to exclude the premium on acquired debt and the resulting amortization, respectively. A breach of a restrictive covenant in the Company’s credit agreement or the inability of the Company to maintain the financial ratios described above could result in an event of default under the credit agreement. In addition, an event of default would occur under the credit agreement if any indebtedness of the Company in excess of an aggregate principal amount of $150 million becomes due prior to its stated maturity or the holders of such indebtedness become able to cause it to become due prior to its stated maturity. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement, elect to declare the outstanding principal, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. Moreover, most of the Company’s senior notes and debentures contain cross-default provisions based on the non-payment at maturity, or other default after an applicable grace period, of any other debt, the unpaid principal amount of which is not less than $100 million that could be triggered by an event of default under the credit agreement. In such an event, the Company’s senior notes and debentures that contain cross-default provisions would also be subject to acceleration. Commercial Paper The Company is a party to a $2,000 million unsecured commercial paper program. The Company may issue and sell commercial paper in an aggregate amount outstanding at any particular time not to exceed its then- current combined borrowing availability under the bank credit agreement described above. The issuance of commercial paper will have the effect, while such commercial paper is outstanding, of reducing the Company’s borrowing capacity under the bank credit agreement by an amount equal to the principal amount of such commercial paper. The Company had no commercial paper outstanding under its commercial paper program throughout all of 2010 and 2009. This program, which is an obligation of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macy’s, Inc., is not secured. However, Parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations. Senior Notes and Debentures The senior notes and the senior debentures are unsecured obligations of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macy’s, Inc. and Parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed these obligations (see Note 18, “Condensed Consolidating Financial Information”). Other Financing Arrangements At January 29, 2011, the Company had dedicated approximately $52 million of cash, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, which is used to collateralize the Company’s issuances of standby letters of credit. There were approximately $38 million of other standby letters of credit outstanding at January 29, 2011 and none outstanding at January 30, 2010. F-24 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 9. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gift cards and customer award certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued wages and vacation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease related liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taxes other than income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of workers’ compensation and general liability reserves . . . Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of post employment and postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . Allowance for future sales returns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Severance and relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) $ 559 654 311 271 186 144 98 88 67 1 265 $2,644 $ 484 594 307 265 199 141 122 94 65 71 284 $2,626 Adjustments to the allowance for future sales returns, which amounted to a charge of $2 million for 2010, a charge of $6 million for 2009, and a credit of $14 million for 2008 are reflected in cost of sales. Changes in workers’ compensation and general liability reserves, including the current portion, are as follows: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charged to costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments, net of recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 478 148 (138) (millions) $ 495 $ 471 164 (140) 124 (141) Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 488 $ 478 $ 495 2010 2009 2008 The non-current portion of workers’ compensation and general liability reserves is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, workers’ compensation and general liability reserves included $93 million and $90 million, respectively, of liabilities which are covered by deposits and receivables included in current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 10. Taxes The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. F-25 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Income tax expense (benefit) is as follows: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total $217 12 $229 $234 10 $244 $451 22 $473 $48 9 $57 (millions) $ 84 37 $121 $132 46 $178 $ 6 8 $14 $(109) (68) $(103) (60) $(177) $(163) The income tax expense (benefit) reported differs from the expected tax computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rate of 35% for 2010, 2009 and 2008 to income (loss) before income taxes. The reasons for this difference and their tax effects are as follows: Expected tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlement of federal tax examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-deductibility of goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $462 14 – – (3) (millions) $177 30 (21) – (8) $(1,728) (40) – 1,611 (6) 2010 2009 2008 $473 $178 $ (163) During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company settled Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examinations for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006. As a result of the settlement, the Company recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries. F-26 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows: January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) Deferred tax assets: Post employment and postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued liabilities accounted for on a cash basis for tax purposes . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized state tax benefits and accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 473 195 117 91 61 144 (35) $ 667 316 132 91 55 114 (33) Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,046 1,342 Deferred tax liabilities: Excess of book basis over tax basis of property and equipment . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,793) (483) (162) (217) (2,655) (1,919) (456) (129) (184) (2,688) Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,609) $(1,346) The valuation allowance at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 relates to net deferred tax assets for state net operating loss carryforwards. The net change in the valuation allowance amounted to an increase of $2 million for 2010 and no change for 2009. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had no federal net operating loss carryforwards and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,301 million, which will expire between 2011 and 2031. F-27 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: Balance, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reductions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statute expirations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 (millions) $207 19 – (8) (4) (9) $205 $170 24 11 $205 $237 23 – (34) (8) (11) $207 $169 24 14 $207 As of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, net of deferred tax assets, that, if recognized would affect the effective income tax rate, was $133 million and $135 million, respectively. The Company classifies unrecognized tax benefits not expected to be settled within one year as other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company classifies federal, state and local interest and penalties not expected to be settled within one year as other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and follows a policy of recognizing all interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized charges of $5 million, $4 million and $16 million, respectively, in income tax expense for federal, state and local interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $80 million and $78 million accrued for the payment of federal, state and local interest and penalties at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively. The accrued federal, state and local interest and penalties primarily relates to state tax issues and the amount of penalties paid in prior periods, and the amount of penalties accrued at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 are insignificant. At January 29, 2011, approximately $76 million of federal, state and local interest and penalties is included in other liabilities and $4 million is included in current income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2000. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been accrued for any adjustments that are expected to result from the years still subject to examination. F-28 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 11. Retirement Plans The Company has a funded defined benefit plan (“Pension Plan”) and a defined contribution plan (“Retirement Plan”) which cover substantially all employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a year. In addition, the Company has an unfunded defined benefit supplementary retirement plan (“SERP”), which provides benefits, for certain employees, in excess of qualified plan limitations. Pension Plan The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status of the Pension Plan as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: 2010 2009 (millions) Change in projected benefit obligation Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,879 99 158 103 (215) $ 2,444 81 173 401 (220) Projected benefit obligation, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,024 $ 2,879 Changes in plan assets Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Company contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,865 329 825 (215) $ 1,438 277 370 (220) Fair value of plan assets, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,804 $ 1,865 Funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (220) $(1,014) Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (220) $(1,014) Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,116 (2) $ 1,186 (3) $1,114 $ 1,183 The accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension Plan was $2,791 million as of January 29, 2011 and $2,657 million as of January 30, 2010. F-29 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Net pension costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the Pension Plan included the following actuarially determined components: Net Periodic Pension Cost Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service credit $ 99 158 (218) 61 (1) $ 81 $ 97 159 (192) 5 – 173 (187) – (1) 2010 2009 2008 (millions) Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligation Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Net actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Amortization of prior service credit 99 66 69 (9) (61) 1 (69) 311 – 1 312 604 (5) – 599 Total recognized in net periodic pension cost and other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . $ 30 $ 378 $ 668 The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the Pension Plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss into net periodic benefit cost during 2011 are $84 million and $(1) million, respectively. As permitted under ASC Subtopic 715-30, “Defined Benefit Plans – Pension,” the amortization of any prior service cost is determined using a straight-line amortization of the cost over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive the benefits under the Pension Plan. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the projected benefit obligations for the Pension Plan at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.40% 5.65% 4.50% 4.50% 2010 2009 The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the net periodic pension cost for the Pension Plan: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected long-term return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.65% 7.45% 6.25% 8.75% 8.75% 8.75% 4.50% 5.40% 5.40% 2010 2009 2008 The Pension Plan’s assumptions are evaluated annually and updated as necessary. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the projected benefit obligation for the Pension Plan is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various F-30 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) maturities. Each year’s expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for the projected benefit obligation. The Company develops its expected long-term rate of return on plan asset assumption by evaluating input from several professional advisors taking into account the asset allocation of the portfolio and long-term asset class return expectations, as well as long-term inflation assumptions. Expected returns for each major asset class are considered along with their volatility and the expected correlations among them. These expectations are based upon historical relationships as well as forecasts of how future returns may vary from historical returns. Returns by asset class and correlations among asset classes are combined using the target asset allocation to derive an expected return for the portfolio as a whole. Long-term historical returns of the portfolio are also considered. Portfolio returns are calculated net of all expenses, therefore, the Company also analyzes expected costs and expenses, including investment management fees, administrative expenses, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premiums and other costs and expenses. The Company develops its rate of compensation increase assumption on an age-graded basis based on recent experience and reflects an estimate of future compensation levels taking into account general increase levels, seniority, promotions and other factors. The salary increase assumption is used to project employees’ pay in future years and its impact on the projected benefit obligation for the Pension Plan. This assumption was revised during 2009 based on the completion of a third-party assumption study reflecting more recent experience. The assets of the Pension Plan are managed by investment specialists with the primary objectives of payment of benefit obligations to Plan participants and an ultimate realization of investment returns over longer periods in excess of inflation. The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of domestic and foreign equity securities, fixed income securities and other investments is used to maximize the long-term return on the assets of the Pension Plan for a prudent level of risk. Risks are mitigated through the asset diversification and the use of multiple investment managers. The target allocation for plan assets is currently 60% equity securities, 25% debt securities, 10% real estate and 5% private equities. The Company generally employs investment managers to specialize in a specific asset class. These managers are chosen and monitored with the assistance of professional advisors, using criteria that include organizational structure, investment philosophy, investment process, performance compared to market benchmarks and peer groups. The Company periodically conducts an analysis of the behavior of the Pension Plan’s assets and liabilities under various economic and interest rate scenarios to ensure that the long-term target asset allocation is appropriate given the liabilities. F-31 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The fair values of the Pension Plan assets as of January 29, 2011, excluding interest and dividend receivables and pending investment purchases and sales, by asset category are as follows: Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total $ 381 $ – $ 381 $ (millions) – – – – – – – – – – 201 143 144 $488 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity securities: U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income securities: U. S. Treasury bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Government bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency backed bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-backed securities and forwards . . . . . . . . . Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other types of investments: Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hedge funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814 517 54 28 11 267 107 19 180 201 143 144 238 – – – – – – – – – – – 576 517 54 28 11 267 107 19 180 – – – Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,866 $238 $2,140 F-32 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The fair values of the Pension Plan assets as of January 30, 2010, excluding interest and dividend receivables and pending investment purchases and sales, by asset category are as follows: Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total $ 184 $ – $ 184 $ (millions) Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity securities: U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income securities: U. S. Treasury bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Government bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency backed bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mortgage-backed securities and forwards . . . . . . . . . Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pooled funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other types of investments: Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hedge funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Private equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613 262 41 11 15 91 91 20 164 156 133 124 163 – – – – – – – – – – – 450 262 41 11 15 91 91 20 164 – – – Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,905 $163 $1,329 – – – – – – – – – – 156 133 124 $413 Corporate bonds consist primarily of investment grade bonds of U.S. issuers from diverse industries. The fair value of the real estate, hedge funds and private equity investments represents the reported net asset value of shares or underlying assets of the investment. Private equity and real estate investments are valued using fair values per the most recent financial reports provided by the investment sponsor, adjusted as appropriate for any lag between the date of the financial reports and the Company’s reporting date. The real estate investments are diversified across property types and geographical areas primarily in the United States of America. Private equity investments generally invest in limited partnerships in the United States of America and Europe. The hedge fund investments are through a fund of funds approach. Due to the nature of the underlying assets of the real estate, hedge funds and private equity investments, changes in market conditions and the economic environment may significantly impact the net asset value of these investments and, consequently, the fair value of the Pension Plan’s investments. These investments are redeemable at net asset value to the extent provided in the documentation governing the investments. However, these redemption rights may be restricted in accordance with the governing documents. Redemption of these investments is subject to restrictions including lock-up periods where no redemptions are allowed, restrictions on redemption frequency and advance notice periods for redemptions. As of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, certain of these investments are generally subject to lock-up periods, ranging from three to fifteen years, certain of these investments are subject to restrictions on redemption frequency, ranging from daily to twice per year, and certain of these investments are subject to advance notice requirements, ranging from sixty-day notification to ninety-day notification. As of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the Pension Plan had unfunded F-33 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) commitments related to certain of these investments totaling approximately $133 million and $78 million, respectively. The following table sets forth a summary of changes in fair value of the Pension Plan’s level 3 assets for 2010 and 2009: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual gain (loss) on plan assets: Relating to assets still held at the reporting date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Relating to assets sold during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 (millions) $413 $419 28 18 29 (13) (21) 28 Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $488 $413 During 2010 and 2009, the Company made funding contributions to the Pension Plan totaling approximately $825 million and $370 million, respectively. On March 28, 2011, the Company made a voluntary funding contribution to the Pension Plan of $225 million. The Company does not presently anticipate making any additional funding contributions to the Pension Plan during 2011, but may choose to do so in its discretion. The following benefit payments are estimated to be paid from the Pension Plan: Fiscal year: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016-2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (millions) $ 233 230 230 234 239 1,234 F-34 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Supplementary Retirement Plan The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of the supplementary retirement plan as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: 2010 2009 (millions) Change in projected benefit obligation Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 680 6 37 22 (57) $ 599 4 42 113 (78) Projected benefit obligation, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 688 $ 680 Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Company contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – 57 (57) $ – 78 (78) Fair value of plan assets, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – $ – Funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(688) $(680) Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (52) (636) $ (54) (626) $(688) $(680) Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service credit $ 113 (2) $ 94 (3) $ 111 $ 91 The accumulated benefit obligation for the supplementary retirement plan was $645 million as of January 29, 2011 and $643 million as of January 30, 2010. F-35 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Net pension costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the supplementary retirement plan included the following actuarially determined components: Net Periodic Pension Cost Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service credit Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligation Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Net actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service credit 2010 2009 2008 (millions) $ 6 37 3 (1) 45 $ 4 42 – (2) 44 $ 8 39 – (2) 45 22 (3) 1 20 113 – 2 115 (57) – 2 (55) Total recognized in net periodic pension cost and other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . $65 $159 $(10) The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the supplementary retirement plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss into net periodic benefit cost during 2011 are $7 million and $(1) million, respectively. As permitted under ASC Subtopic 715-30, “Defined Benefit Plans – Pension,” the amortization of any prior service cost is determined using a straight-line amortization of the cost over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive the benefits under the plans. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the projected benefit obligations for the supplementary retirement plan at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.40% 5.65% 4.90% 4.90% 2010 2009 The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine net pension costs for the supplementary retirement plan: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.65% 7.45% 6.25% 4.90% 7.20% 7.20% 2010 2009 2008 The supplementary retirement plan’s assumptions are evaluated annually and updated as necessary. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the projected benefit obligation for the supplementary retirement plan is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various maturities. Each year’s expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for the projected benefit obligation. F-36 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The Company develops its rate of compensation increase assumption on an age-graded basis based on recent experience and reflects an estimate of future compensation levels taking into account general increase levels, seniority, promotions and other factors. The salary increase assumption is used to project employees’ pay in future years and its impact on the projected benefit obligation for the supplementary retirement plan. This assumption was revised during 2009 based on the completion of a third-party assumption study reflecting more recent experience. The following benefit payments are estimated to be funded by the Company and paid from the supplementary retirement plan: Fiscal year: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016-2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (millions) $ 52 50 50 54 54 264 Retirement Plan The Retirement Plan includes a voluntary savings feature for eligible employees. The Company’s contribution was historically based on the Company’s annual earnings including a minimum contribution rate based on an employee’s eligible savings and more recently based on a stated matching contribution rate based on an employee’s eligible savings. Expense for the Retirement Plan amounted to $9 million for 2010, $9 million for 2009 and $37 million for 2008. Deferred Compensation Plan The Company has a deferred compensation plan wherein eligible executives may elect to defer a portion of their compensation each year as either stock credits or cash credits. The Company transfers shares to a trust to cover the number management estimates will be needed for distribution on account of stock credits currently outstanding. At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the liability under the plan, which is reflected in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $46 million and $51 million, respectively. Expense for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was immaterial. F-37 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 12. Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits In addition to pension and other supplemental benefits, certain retired employees currently are provided with specified health care and life insurance benefits. Eligibility requirements for such benefits vary by division and subsidiary, but generally state that benefits are available to eligible employees who were hired prior to a certain date and retire after a certain age with specified years of service. Certain employees are subject to having such benefits modified or terminated. The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status of the postretirement obligations as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: 2010 2009 (millions) Change in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Medicare Part D subsidy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 – 15 8 2 (25) $ 277 – 19 8 2 (28) Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 $ 278 Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Company contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – 25 (25) $ – 28 (28) Fair value of plan assets, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ – $ – Funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(278) $(278) Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (30) (248) $ (31) (247) $(278) $(278) Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 Net actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (25) $ (38) F-38 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Net postretirement benefit costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income included the following actuarially determined components: 2010 2009 2008 (millions) Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service credit $ – 15 (5) – $ – 19 (7) – $ – 19 (3) – Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligation Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Net actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service credit 8 5 – 8 7 – 13 15 (70) 3 – (67) Total recognized in net periodic postretirement benefit cost and other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23 $27 $(51) 10 12 16 The estimated net actuarial gain of the postretirement obligations that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss into net postretirement benefit cost during 2011 is $(3) million. As permitted under ASC Subtopic 715-60, “Defined Benefit Plans – Other Postretirement,” the amortization of any prior service cost is determined using a straight-line amortization of the cost over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive the benefits under the plans. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.40% 5.65% 2010 2009 The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the net postretirement benefit costs for the postretirement obligations: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.65% 7.45% 6.25% 2010 2009 2008 The postretirement benefit obligation assumptions are evaluated annually and updated as necessary. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligations is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various maturities. Each year’s expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations. F-39 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The future medical benefits provided by the Company for certain employees are based on a fixed amount per year of service, and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is not affected by increases in health care costs. However, the future medical benefits provided by the Company for certain other employees are affected by increases in health care costs. In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” and the “Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010” (the “2010 Acts”). Included among the major provisions of these laws is a change in the tax treatment related to the Medicare Part D subsidy. The Company’s postretirement obligations reflect estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Under the 2010 Acts, the Company’s deductions for retiree prescription drug benefits will be reduced by the amount of Medicare Part D subsidies received beginning February 3, 2013. During 2010, the Company recorded a $4 million deferred tax expense to reduce its deferred tax asset as a result of the elimination of the deductibility of retiree health care payments to the extent of tax-free Medicare Part D subsidies that are received. Based on data currently available, the Company is not able at this time to determine the ongoing impact that the other provisions of the 2010 Acts will have on the Company-sponsored medical plans. As a result of this legislation, the Company is evaluating the impact of the 2010 Acts on the active and retiree benefit plans offered by the Company. The provisions of the 2010 Act did not require a re-measurement of the Company’s postretirement obligations and did not impact the postretirement net periodic benefit costs for 2010. The following provides the assumed health care cost trend rates related to the Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010: Health care cost trend rates assumed for next year . . . . . . . . . . Rates to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 8.38% – 10.08% 8.69% – 10.54% 5.0% 2022 5.0% 2022 The assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects: Effect on total of service and interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 $15 $ (1) $(14) 1 – Percentage Point Increase 1 – Percentage Point Decrease (millions) F-40 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The following table reflects the benefit payments estimated to be funded by the Company and paid from the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations and estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003: Expected Benefit Payments Expected Federal Subsidy (millions) Fiscal Year: 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016-2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28 28 27 26 25 109 $1 1 1 1 1 5 13. Stock Based Compensation During 2009, the Company obtained shareholder approval for the Macy’s 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan under which up to fifty-one million shares of Common Stock may be issued. This plan is intended to help the Company attract and retain directors, officers, other key executives and employees and is also intended to provide incentives and rewards relating to the Company’s business plans to encourage such persons to devote themselves to the business of the Company. Prior to 2009, the Company had two equity plans. As a result of the August 30, 2005 acquisition of The May Department Stores Company (“May”), the Company assumed May’s equity plan, which was subsequently amended to have identical terms and provisions of the Company’s other equity plan. At August 30, 2005, all outstanding May options under May’s equity plan were fully vested and were converted into options to acquire common stock of the Company in accordance with the merger agreement. The following disclosures present the Company’s equity plans prior to 2009 on a combined basis. The equity plan is administered by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors (the “CMD Committee”). The CMD Committee is authorized to grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to officers and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and to non-employee directors. Stock option grants have an exercise price at least equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, have ten-year terms and typically vest ratably over four years of continued employment. Restricted stock and time-based restricted stock unit awards generally vest one to four years from the date of grant. Performance-based restricted stock units vest based on the results attained during the performance period. As of January 29, 2011, 41.7 million shares of common stock were available for additional grants pursuant to the Company’s equity plan. Common stock is delivered out of treasury stock upon the exercise of stock options and grant of restricted stock. F-41 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Stock-based compensation expense included the following components: Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 (millions) $43 26 3 4 $ 55 (18) 6 – $76 $ 43 $34 19 2 11 $66 All stock-based compensation expense is recorded in SG&A expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Stock-based compensation expense for 2008 included a credit, reflecting a decrease in the stock price used to calculate the settlement amount of stock credits. The income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to stock-based compensation was approximately $24 million, approximately $28 million, and approximately $16 million, for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During 2010, the CMD Committee approved awards of performance-based restricted stock units to certain senior executives of the Company. Each award reflects a target number of shares (“Target Shares”) that may be issued to the award recipient. These awards may be earned upon the completion of a three-year performance period ending February 2, 2013. Whether units are earned at the end of the performance period will be determined based on the achievement of certain performance objectives set by the CMD Committee in connection with the issuance of the units. The performance objectives are based on the Company’s business plan covering the performance period and include an EBITDA as a percent to sales ratio and a return on invested capital ratio. Depending on the results achieved during the three-year performance period, the actual number of shares that a grant recipient receives at the end of the period may range from 0% to 150% of the Target Shares granted. Also during 2010, the CMD Committee approved awards of time-based restricted stock to certain senior executives of the Company and awards of time-based restricted stock units to the non-employee members of the Company’s board of directors. During 2009, the CMD Committee approved awards of performance-based restricted stock units to certain senior executives of the Company (the “Founders Awards”). The Founders Awards may be earned upon the completion of a three-year performance period ending January 28, 2012. Whether units are earned at the end of the performance period will be determined based on the achievement of relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance objectives set by the CMD Committee in connection with the issuance of the units. Relative TSR reflects the change in the value of the Company’s common stock over the performance period in relation to the change in the value of the common stock of a ten-company executive compensation peer group over the performance period, assuming the reinvestment of dividends. If the Company’s TSR for the performance period is equal to or less than the median TSR for the peer group, the entire Founders Award opportunity will be forfeited. If the Company’s TSR for the performance period is above the median but equal to or below the 66th percentile for the peer group, 75% of the award opportunity will vest. If the Company’s TSR for the performance period is above the 66th percentile for the peer group, 100% of the award opportunity will vest. F-42 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The fair value of stock-options granted during 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value are as follows: Weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 7.34 1.0% 37.6% 2.7% $ 2.51 2.3% 36.4% 1.9% 7.42 2.2% 36.2% 2.7% 5.5years 5.4 years 5.3 years 2010 2009 2008 The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option- pricing model. The Company estimates the expected volatility and expected option life assumption consistent with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The expected volatility of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is estimated based on a historic volatility rate and the expected option life is calculated based on historical stock option experience as the best estimate of future exercise patterns. The dividend yield assumption is based on historical and anticipated dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates consistent with the expected life of each stock option grant. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. Compensation expense is recorded for all stock options expected to vest based on the amortization of the fair value at the date of grant on a straight-line basis primarily over the vesting period of the options. Stock option activity for 2010 is as follows: Outstanding, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canceled or forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (millions) Weighted Average Exercise Price $25.47 $20.88 $24.46 $16.70 Shares (thousands) 38,804.9 3,908.6 (2,285.2) (2,327.0) Outstanding, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,101.3 $25.59 Exercisable, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,404.5 $27.92 Options expected to vest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,293.1 $20.35 4.0 8.0 $(130) $ 27 Additional information relating to stock options is as follows: Intrinsic value of options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grant date fair value of stock options that vested during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash received from stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefits realized from exercised stock options and vested restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2010 2009 2008 (millions) $ 2 71 8 – $ 1 65 6 – $13 55 39 4 F-43 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) The Company also has a stock credit plan. In 2006, key management personnel became eligible to earn a stock credit grant over a two-year performance period ending February 2, 2008. There were a total of 727,629 stock credit awards outstanding as of January 29, 2011, including reinvested dividend equivalents earned during the holding period, relating to the 2006 grant. In general, with respect to the stock credits awarded to participants in 2006, the value of one-half of the stock credits earned plus reinvested dividend equivalents was paid in cash in early 2010 and the value of the other half of such earned stock credits plus reinvested dividend equivalents was paid in cash in early 2011. In 2008, key management personnel became eligible to earn a stock credit grant over a two-year performance period ending January 30, 2010. There were a total of 1,690,716 stock credit awards outstanding as of January 29, 2011, relating to the 2008 grant. In general, with respect to the stock credits awarded to participants in 2008, the value of one-half of the stock credits earned plus reinvested dividend equivalents will be paid in cash in early 2012 and the value of the other half of such earned stock credits plus reinvested dividend equivalents will be paid in cash in early 2013. Compensation expense for stock credit awards is recorded on a straight-line basis primarily over the vesting period and is calculated based on the ending stock price for each reporting period. At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the liability under the stock credit plans, which is reflected in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $52 million and $45 million, respectively. Activity related to stock credits for 2010 is as follows: Stock credits, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional dividend equivalents earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock credits forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock credits distributed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 3,267,355 22,339 (145,404) (725,945) Stock credits, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,418,345 The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows: Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20.89 $20.95 $ – $3.59 $24.85 – $ 2010 2009 2008 The fair value of the Target Shares and restricted stock awards are based on the fair value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. The fair value of the Founders Award was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the total shareholder return ranking of the Company among a ten-company executive compensation peer group over the remaining performance period. The expected volatility of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant was estimated based on a historical average volatility rate for the approximate three-year performance period. The dividend yield assumption was based on historical and anticipated dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on observed interest rates consistent with the approximate three-year performance measurement period. Compensation expense is recorded for all restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards based on the amortization of the fair market value at the date of grant over the period the restrictions lapse or over the performance period of the performance-based restricted stock units. F-44 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) Restricted stock award activity for 2010 is as follows: Nonvested, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 179,056 148,366 (17,782) (59,594) Nonvested, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250,046 Activity related to restricted stock units for 2010 is as follows: Nonvested, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted – performance-based . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted – time-based . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 2,886,975 1,046,602 39,924 (184,867) – Nonvested, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,788,634 There have been no grants of stock appreciation rights under the equity plans. Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $33.66 20.89 23.78 26.55 $28.48 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $ 3.59 20.89 22.54 3.59 – $ 8.57 As of January 29, 2011, the Company had $38 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years, $2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years, and $19 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years. 14. Shareholders’ Equity The authorized shares of the Company consist of 125 million shares of preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”), par value of $.01 per share, with no shares issued, and 1,000 million shares of Common Stock, par value of $.01 per share, with 495.0 million shares of Common Stock issued and 423.3 million shares of Common Stock outstanding at January 29, 2011, and with 495.0 million shares of Common Stock issued and 420.8 million shares of Common Stock outstanding at January 30, 2010 (with shares held in the Company’s treasury being treated as issued, but not outstanding). Commencing in January 2000, the Company’s board of directors has from time to time approved authorizations to purchase, in the aggregate, up to $9,500 million of Common Stock. All authorizations are cumulative and do not have an expiration date. As of January 29, 2011, $852 million of authorization remained unused. Although the Company’s share repurchase program is currently suspended and the Company has not made any purchases of Common Stock since February 1, 2008 and currently does not intend to make any such F-45 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) purchases in 2011, it may resume purchases of Common Stock under these or possible future authorizations in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise at any time and from time to time without prior notice. Common Stock The holders of the Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Subject to preferential rights that may be applicable to any Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors in its discretion, out of funds legally available therefor. Treasury Stock Treasury stock contains shares repurchased under the share repurchase program, shares repurchased to cover employee tax liabilities related to stock plan activity and shares maintained in a trust related to deferred compensation plans. Under the deferred compensation plans, shares are maintained in a trust to cover the number estimated to be needed for distribution on account of stock credits currently outstanding. Changes in the Company’s Common Stock issued and outstanding, including shares held by the Company’s treasury, are as follows: Balance at February 2, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases: Repurchase program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . Balance at January 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases: Repurchase program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . Balance at January 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock issued under stock plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock repurchases: Repurchase program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation plan distributions . . . . . Treasury Stock Common Stock Issued Deferred Compensation Plans Other Total Common Stock Outstanding 495,038.5 (1,218.1) (157.6) (thousands) (74,075.4) 464.1 (75,293.5) 419,745.0 306.5 306.5 (25.7) 58.0 – (25.7) 58.0 – (25.7) 58.0 495,038.5 (1,317.7) (105.0) (73,637.0) 937.9 (74,954.7) 420,083.8 832.9 832.9 (130.1) 56.6 – (130.1) 56.6 – (130.1) 56.6 495,038.5 (1,366.1) (48.8) (72,829.2) 2,439.5 (74,195.3) 420,843.2 2,390.7 2,390.7 (58.5) – (58.5) 165.9 – (58.5) 165.9 165.9 Balance at January 29, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495,038.5 (1,249.0) (70,448.2) (71,697.2) 423,341.3 F-46 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 15. Fair Value Measurements and Concentrations of Credit Risk The following table shows the Company’s financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis: January 29, 2011 Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Total Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total (millions) January 30, 2010 Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Marketable equity and debt securities . . . . $95 $41 $54 $ – $99 $33 $66 $ – On February 25, 2011, the Company sold its investment in The Knot, Inc. and unrecognized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income were reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Other financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, short-term debt, merchandise accounts payable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and long-term debt. With the exception of long-term debt, the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of long-term debt, excluding capitalized leases, are estimated based on the quoted market prices for publicly traded debt or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The following table shows the estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt: January 29, 2011 January 30, 2010 Notional Amount Carrying Amount Fair Value Notional Amount Carrying Amount Fair Value (millions) Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,702 $6,941 $6,969 $8,156 $8,431 $7,946 The following table shows certain of the Company’s non-financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2010 and 2009: January 29, 2011 Fair Value Measurements January 30, 2010 Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Total Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total (millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Long-lived assets held and used . . . . . . . . . $18 $ – $ – $18 $33 $ – $ – $33 During 2010, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $36 million were written down to their fair value of $18 million, resulting in an asset impairment charge of $18 million. During 2009, long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $148 million were written down to their fair value of $33 million, resulting in an asset impairment charge of $115 million. The fair values of these locations were calculated based F-47 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) on the projected cash flows and an estimated risk-adjusted rate of return that would be used by market participants in valuing these assets or prices of similar assets. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments. The Company places its temporary cash investments in what it believes to be high credit quality financial instruments. 16. Earnings (Loss) Per Share The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share: 2010 2009 2008 Net Income Shares Net Income Shares Net Loss (millions, except per share data) Net income (loss) and average number of shares outstanding . . . $847 422.2 $329 420.4 $(4,775) Shares to be issued under deferred compensation plans . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per 1.1 1.3 $847 423.3 $329 421.7 $(4,775) share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.00 $.78 $(11.34) Effect of dilutive securities – Stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units . . Diluted earnings (loss) per 4.0 1.5 $847 427.3 $329 423.2 $(4,775) share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.98 $.78 $(11.34) Shares 420.0 1.2 421.2 – 421.2 In addition to the stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units reflected in the foregoing table, stock options to purchase 24.8 million shares of common stock and restricted stock units relating to 260,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at January 29, 2011 and stock options to purchase 28.9 million shares of common stock, 75,000 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units relating to 2.9 million shares of common stock were outstanding at January 30, 2010 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for 2010 and 2009, respectively, because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Stock options to purchase 38.8 million of shares of common stock and 483,000 shares of restricted stock were outstanding at January 31, 2009, but were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for 2008 because, as a result of the Company’s net loss for the fiscal year, their inclusion would have been antidilutive. F-48 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) 17. Quarterly Results (unaudited) Unaudited quarterly results for the last two years were as follows: First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter (millions, except per share data) 2010: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,574 (3,378) $ 5,537 (3,214) $ 5,623 (3,377) $ 8,269 (4,855) Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,196 (1,993) – 23 .05 .05 2,323 (1,953) – 147 .35 .35 2,246 (2,069) – 10 .02 .02 3,414 (2,245) (25) 667 1.57 1.55 2009: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,199 (3,219) $ 5,164 (3,021) $ 5,277 (3,156) $ 7,849 (4,577) Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,980 (1,956) (138) (88) (.21) (.21) 2,143 (1,861) (34) 7 .02 .02 2,121 (2,033) (33) (35) (.08) (.08) 3,272 (2,212) (186) 445 1.05 1.05 18. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information The senior notes and senior debentures of the Company described in Note 8, which constitute debt obligations of Parent’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc. (“Subsidiary Issuer”) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Parent. In the following condensed consolidating financial statements, “Other Subsidiaries” includes all other direct subsidiaries of Parent, including FDS Bank, Leadville Insurance Company and Snowdin Insurance Company, Macy’s Merchandising Group, Inc. and its subsidiary Macy’s Merchandising Group International, LLC. “Subsidiary Issuer” includes operating divisions and non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Subsidiary Issuer on an equity basis. The assets and liabilities and results of operations of the non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Subsidiary Issuer are also reflected in “Other Subsidiaries.” Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the related Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008, and the related Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for 2010, 2009, and 2008 are presented on the following pages. F-49 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet As of January 29, 2011 (millions) Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated ASSETS: Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,174 $ Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and Equipment – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill Other Intangible Assets – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Tax Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in Subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,174 – – – 4 19 1,651 2,908 41 89 2,589 98 – – 2,817 5,013 3,315 184 133 – – 2,598 $ 249 303 2,169 187 – – 2,908 3,800 428 453 402 – 2,738 – $ – – – – – – – – – – – (19) (4,389) (5,506) $ 1,464 392 4,758 285 – – 6,899 8,813 3,743 637 539 – – – Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,756 $14,060 $10,729 $(9,914) $20,631 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Current Liabilities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Short-term debt Merchandise accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – $ – 144 29 – 451 680 1,069 18 285 $ Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Debt Intercompany Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 – – – 53 5,530 2,503 6,942 4,389 400 748 (922) Total Liabilities and 3 741 1,431 135 79 2,389 29 – 864 1,019 6,428 $ – – – – – – – (4,389) (19) – (5,506) $ 454 1,421 2,644 182 364 5,065 6,971 – 1,245 1,820 5,530 Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,756 $14,060 $10,729 $(9,914) $20,631 F-50 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For 2010 (millions) Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest (expense) income, net: External . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal, state and local income tax benefit – – – (8) – (8) 2 (2) 852 844 $13,124 (8,006) $ 19,900 (14,782) $(8,021) 7,964 5,118 (4,519) (21) 578 (575) (165) 417 255 5,118 (3,790) (4) 1,324 (1) 167 – 1,490 (57) 57 – – – – (1,269) (1,269) (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 65 (541) – $ 25,003 (14,824) 10,179 (8,260) (25) 1,894 (574) – – 1,320 (473) Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $847 $ 320 $ 949 $(1,269) $ 847 F-51 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For 2010 (millions) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . Dividends received from subsidiaries . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in working capital . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided (used) by Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated $ 847 $ 320 $ 949 $(1,269) $ 847 – (852) 541 – 179 8 21 (417) 250 566 (454) (526) 4 – – 584 232 45 – 1,269 (791) – – – 25 – – 1,150 (43) (473) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 723 (240) 1,814 (791) 1,506 – – – (178) – (178) – (84) (1,242) – 42 (710) (115) (867) (144) – 1,656 (15) 399 (19) 60 41 (247) (40) (287) (3) (791) – (946) 154 (1,586) (59) 308 249 $ $ – – – – 791 – – – 791 – – – (425) (40) (465) (1,245) (84) 42 – 24 (1,263) (222) 1,686 $ 1,464 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment and capitalized software, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used by investing activities . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Debt repaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock, net of common stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany activity, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided (used) by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,318 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . $1,174 $ F-52 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet As of January 30, 2010 (millions) Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated ASSETS: Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,318 $ Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – 7 – Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and Equipment – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill Other Intangible Assets – net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Tax Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in Subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,325 – – – 4 113 895 2,574 60 82 2,536 98 – – 2,776 5,383 3,315 217 123 – – 2,790 $ 308 276 2,079 125 – 54 2,842 4,124 428 461 363 – 2,185 – $ – – – – (7) (54) (61) – – – – (113) (3,080) (5,364) $ 1,686 358 4,615 223 – – 6,882 9,507 3,743 678 490 – – – Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,911 $14,604 $10,403 $(8,618) $21,300 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Current Liabilities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Short-term debt Merchandise accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – $ – 117 – 93 239 637 1,529 4 175 $ Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Debt Intercompany Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 – – – 48 4,653 2,584 8,432 3,080 635 1,137 (1,264) Total Liabilities and 3 675 980 71 – 1,729 24 – 610 1,412 6,628 $ – – – (7) (54) (61) – (3,080) (113) – (5,364) $ 242 1,312 2,626 68 214 4,462 8,456 – 1,132 2,597 4,653 Shareholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,911 $14,604 $10,403 $(8,618) $21,300 F-53 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For 2009 (millions) Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest (expense) income, net: External . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal, state and local income tax benefit – – – (8) – (8) 3 (2) 333 326 $12,791 (7,836) $ 16,700 (12,073) $(6,002) 5,936 4,955 (4,616) 4,627 (3,504) (226) 113 (558) (153) 201 (397) (165) 958 (1) 155 – 1,112 (66) 66 – – – – (534) (534) (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 232 (413) – Consolidated $ 23,489 (13,973) 9,516 (8,062) (391) 1,063 (556) – – 507 (178) Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $329 $ (165) $ 699 $ (534) $ 329 F-54 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For 2009 (millions) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . Dividends received from subsidiaries . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in working capital . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated $ 329 $(165) $ 699 $(534) $ 329 – (333) 436 – 114 73 226 (201) 60 619 163 (96) 165 – – 591 (245) (189) – 534 (496) – – – 391 – – 1,210 32 (212) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619 606 1,021 (496) 1,750 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment and capitalized software, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used by investing activities . . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Debt repaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock, net of common stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany activity, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used by financing activities . . . . – – – – (84) 7 (247) (24) (348) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,047 (147) – (147) (963) – – 493 3 (467) (8) 68 (227) (3) (230) (3) (496) – (246) (8) (753) 38 270 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . $1,318 $ 60 $ 308 $ – – – – 496 – – – (374) (3) (377) (966) (84) 7 – (29) 496 (1,072) – – – 301 1,385 $ 1,686 F-55 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For 2008 (millions) Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments $13,540 (8,528) $13,755 (8,812) $(2,403) 2,331 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – (5) – – 5,012 (4,747) (224) (3,243) Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest (expense) income, net: External . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in losses of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) (3,202) 20 (5) (4,781) (583) (130) (1,880) 4,943 (3,801) (174) (2,139) (1,171) 3 135 – Consolidated $ 24,892 (15,009) 9,883 (8,481) (398) (5,382) (4,378) (560) – – (4,938) (72) 72 – – – – – 6,661 6,661 Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal, state and local income tax benefit (4,771) (5,795) (1,033) (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) 560 (393) – 163 Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(4,775) $ (5,235) $ (1,426) $ 6,661 $ (4,775) F-56 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) MACY’S, INC. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For 2008 (millions) Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in losses of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends received from subsidiaries . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net Net cash provided by Parent Subsidiary Issuer Other Subsidiaries Consolidating Adjustments Consolidated $(4,775) $(5,235) $(1,426) $ 6,661 $(4,775) – – 4,781 800 – (35) (94) 224 3,243 1,880 45 689 174 (617) 174 2,139 – – 589 (320) 475 – – (6,661) (845) – – – 398 5,382 – – 1,278 (181) (236) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 677 403 1,631 (845) 1,866 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment and capitalized software, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net Net cash used by investing activities . . . Cash flows from financing activities: Debt repaid, net of debt issued . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock, net of common stock acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany activity, net Other, net Net cash provided (used) by – – – – (221) 6 332 (82) (224) – (224) (13) (245) – 104 (32) (567) (1) (568) (3) (600) – (436) (20) – – – – 845 – – – (791) (1) (792) (16) (221) 6 – (134) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 (186) (1,059) 845 (365) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712 335 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . $ 1,047 $ (7) 75 68 4 266 270 $ – – – $ 709 676 $ 1,385 F-57 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] SUSTAINABILITY AT MACY’S, INC. At Macy’s, Inc., we believe that contributing to a more sustainable environment is good business practice and the right thing to do for future generations. We also believe in taking a comprehensive approach to sustainability and renewability with our customers, associates and vendor partners. We have made significant progress and have taken dozens of tangible steps to reduce our impact on the environment. In part, we have: • Installed active solar power systems at about 40 Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s stores and facilities. When a new 3.5-megawatt high-efficiency solar power system goes into service in spring 2011 on the company’s Goodyear, AZ, online fulfillment center, it will be the largest rooftop solar power system in the United States. • Invested in energy efficiency projects and consumption reduction initiatives that reduced our total energy use by 23 percent in the period 2002 to 2010. • Decreased our use of office/copy paper by 36 percent and paper used in marketing by 14 percent in the period 2007 to 2010. • Increased to 90 percent the proportion of recycled or certified paper used in our marketing materials, to 80 percent in our shopping bags, and to 89 percent in gift boxes. • Installed more than 130,000 LED light bulbs in 2010 to cut energy consumption by up to 73 percent in 95 Macy’s stores in 2010, with continued rollout planned for 2011. • Initiated recycling programs that diverted more than 66 tons of waste in 2010 from our stores, offices and distribution centers away from dumping in landfills. • Created an internal website, Green Living, so our 160,000+ associates can interact with the company on sustainability-related topics at work and home. • Substituted biodegradable packing materials in place of foam “peanuts” in shipping products bought by customers online. • Eliminated the use of bottled water for internal meetings in Macy’s offices. • Initiated a two-year process for eliminating foam packaging (cups, bowls, plates, to-go containers) in the company’s in-store restaurants. • Pioneered efforts to reduce the number of empty trucks on the nation’s highways through a coordinated program called Empty Miles Service that matches empty trucks/trailers with other shippers or carriers that can use the space. Macy’s has been recognized by ForestEthics for reducing mailings and overall paper consumption, as well as for increased use of recycled and certified paper. The EPA has rated Macy’s as one of its top 20 partners for generating the most green electricity on site. And Newsweek ranked Macy’s among the top 150 greenest companies in America for its efforts with solar power, recycled paper and eco-friendly merchandise. We know we have more to learn and more to do in reducing our overall impact on the environment. We want Macy’s, Inc. to be a leader in the global effort to improve our climate and we are moving forward with conviction. TANGIBLE SuSTAINABILITy GoALS Building on progress over the past several years, Macy’s, Inc. has set sustainability goals to guide our progress through 2013. Specifically, Macy’s, Inc. will seek to: • Reduce our energy consumption on a kWh per square foot basis by another 8 percent to 10 percent by 2013 (compared with 2009 levels), recognizing that we have already reduced our energy consumption by about 19 percent over the previous seven years (2003 to 2009). • Host an additional 15 percent to 25 percent of renewable energy sources by 2013. • Reduce the amount of paper we use by at least 10 percent by 2013 (from 2009 levels). This is on top of a reduction of 23 percent in the 2007 to 2009 period. • Increase the percentage of recycled (10 percent PCW or higher) and/or third-party certified paper we use in marketing materials to 70 percent by 2013 from 63 percent in 2009 (up from 3 percent in 2006). • Increase the use of sustainable building materials in all major construction projects by 20 percent (over 2010 levels). macysannual2010_08.indd 3 PAGE 3 3/22/11 12:07 AM executive MaNageMeNt teaM otHer Macy’s, iNc. corPorate officers terry J. Lundgren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer timothy M. adams Chief Private Brand Officer thomas L. cole Chief Administrative Officer Mark s. cosby President – Stores Joel a. Belsky Controller dennis J. Broderick General Counsel and Secretary david W. clark Human Resources and Diversity amy Hanson Property Development, Credit and Customer Services Jeffrey gennette Chief Merchandising Officer robert B. Harrison Finance Julie greiner Chief Merchandise Planning Officer Karen M. Hoguet Chief Financial Officer ronald Klein Chief Stores Officer Peter sachse Chief Marketing Officer Michael gould Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bloomingdale’s Janet e. grove Vice Chair William L. Hawthorne iii Diversity Strategies and Legal Affairs Bradley r. Mays Tax James a. sluzewski Corporate Communications and External Affairs ann Munson steines Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary felicia Williams Risk Management and Financial Services shirley H. yoshida Internal Audit Michael Zorn Associate and Labor Relations Board of directors stephen f. Bollenbach Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors KB Home deirdre P. connelly President, North American Pharmaceuticals GlaxoSmithKline Meyer feldberg Dean Emeritus and Professor of Leadership and Ethics Columbia Business School sara Levinson Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ClubMom, Inc. terry J. Lundgren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Macy’s, Inc. Joseph Neubauer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ARAMARK Holdings Corporation Joseph a. Pichler Former Chairman The Kroger Company Joyce M. roché Former President and Chief Executive Officer Girls Incorporated craig e. Weatherup Former Chief Executive Officer The Pepsi-Cola Company Marna c. Whittington Chief Executive Officer Allianz Global Investors Capital macysannual2010_08.indd 4 3/22/11 12:08 AM Shareholder InformatIon TRANSFER AGENT FOR MACY’S, INC. SHARES Macy’s, Inc. c/o BNY Mellon Shareowner Services P.O. Box 358015 Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8015 1-866-337-3311 (Inside the United States and Canada) 1-201-680-6578 (Outside the United States and Canada) For the hearing impaired 1-800-231-5469 (TDD) www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess VISIt US on the Internet: www.macysinc.com www.macys.com www.macysJOBS.com www.bloomingdales.com www.bloomingdalesJOBS.com TO REACH US www.macysinc.com/ir Sign up to have Macy’s, Inc.’s news releases sent to you via e-mail by subscribing to News Direct. Get the latest stock price and chart, or take advantage of the historical price look-up feature. CALL: Macy’s, Inc. Investor Relations Department Monday-Friday, 8:30 a.m. – 5 p.m. (ET) 1-513-579-7028 Macy’s, Inc. News & Information Request Hotline: 1-800-261-5385 WRITE: Macy’s, Inc. Investor Relations Department 7 West Seventh Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 macysannual2010_08.indd 5 3/22/11 12:21 AM www.macysinc.com www.macys.com www.bloomingdales.com macysannual2010_08.indd 3 3/22/11 2:04 PM 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above