M
a
p
l
e
l
e
a
f
f
o
o
d
s
I
n
c
.
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
0
7
Recipe for Success
Maple leaf foods I nc.
Maple leaf foods Inc.
30 St. Clair avenue West, Suite 1500
toronto, ontario, Canada M4V 3a2
www.mapleleaf.com
p
r
i
n
t
e
d
i
n
C
a
n
a
d
a
annual report 2007
Corporate Information
capItal stocK
The Company’s authorized capital consists of an unlimited
number of voting common and an unlimited number of non-voting
common shares. At December 31, 2007, 107,600,271 voting shares
and 22,000,000 non-voting shares were issued and outstanding,
for a total of 129,600,271 outstanding shares. There were
821 shareholders of record of which 786 were registered
in Canada, holding 98.6% of the issued voting shares. All of the
issued non-voting shares are held by Ontario Teachers’ Pension
Plan Board. These non-voting shares may be converted into
voting shares at any time.
sHaReHoldeR InQUIRIes
Inquiries regarding dividends, change of address, transfer
requirements or lost certificates should be directed to the
Company’s transfer agent:
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1
Tel: (514) 982-7555
or 1-800-564-6253 (toll-free North America)
or service@computershare.com
oWneRsHIp
The Company’s major shareholders are McCain Capital Corporation
holding 41,518,153 voting shares representing 32% of the total
issued and outstanding shares and Ontario Teachers’ Pension
Plan Board holding 20,728,371 voting shares and 22,000,000
non-voting shares representing 32.96% of the total issued and
outstanding shares. The remainder of the issued and outstanding
shares are publicly held.
coMpanY InfoRMatIon
For public and investment analysis inquiries, please contact
our Senior Vice-President, Communications & Consumer Affairs
at (416) 926-2000.
For copies of annual and quarterly reports, annual information
form and other disclosure documents, please contact our Senior
Vice-President, Transactions & Administration and Corporate
Secretary at (416) 926-2000.
coRpoRate offIce
Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
30 St. Clair Avenue West
Suite 1500
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4V 3A2
Tel: (416) 926-2000
Fax: (416) 926-2018
Website: www.mapleleaf.com
annUal MeetInG
The annual meeting of shareholders of Maple Leaf Foods Inc. will
be held on Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. at the Glenn Gould
Studio, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation building, 250 Front
Street West, Toronto, Canada.
dIVIdends
The declaration and payment of quarterly dividends are made
at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Anticipated payment
dates in 2008: March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31.
tRansfeR aGent and ReGIstRaR
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1
Tel: (514) 982-7555
or 1-800-564-6253 (toll-free North America)
or service@computershare.com
aUdItoRs
KPMG llp
Toronto, Ontario
stocK eXcHanGe lIstInGs and stocK sYMBol
The Company’s voting common shares are listed on The Toronto
Stock Exchange and trade under the symbol “MFI”.
RappoRt annUel
Si vous désirez recevoir un exemplaire de la version française
de ce rapport, veuillez écrire à l’adresse suivante : Secrétaire
de la société, Les Aliments Maple Leaf Inc., 30 St. Clair Avenue
West, Toronto, Ontario M4V 3A2.
The Main Course
at Maple leaf, we are pursuing a new vision to become
a globally admired meat, meals and bakery company.
We have a recipe for success. It involves building on
our core strengths in brand marketing, consumer insights
and innovation, backed up by world-class plants and
distribution capabilities.
our current focus is on completing the execution of our
plan, and delivering step-change growth in profitability.
Supported by the passion of 23,000 global employees
who share our vision, we are well on our way.
contents
1. Financial Highlights 2. Transforming Our Company 4. Segmented Operating Results
5. Letter from the Chairman 6. Message to Shareholders 18. Financial Statements
financial highlights
For years ended December 31
(In millions of Canadian dollars, except share information)
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Consolidated results
Sales
Adjusted operating earnings(i)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Net earnings, as reported(ii)
Return on assets employed(iii)
FinanCial position
Net assets employed(iv)
Shareholders’ equity
Net borrowings
per share
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations(i)
Net earnings, as reported(ii)
Dividends
Book Value
number oF shares (millions)
Weighted average
Outstanding at December 31
5,210
5,325
199
(23)
207
6.7%
173
(20)
5
5.6%
2,267
1,161
855
-0.18
0.51
1.63
0.16
8.96
127.3
129.6
2,177
994
1,213
-0.16
0.38
0.04
0.16
7.82
127.5
127.1
5,555
201
65
94
7.0%
2,047
999
1,063
0.52
0.59
0.74
0.16
7.82
5,425
4,187
197
68
102
83
(3)
30
7.7%
4.3%
1,893
906
1,046
0.60
0.60
0.90
0.16
7.24
1,322
654
785
-0.03
0.04
0.27
0.16
5.78
113.1
113.2
126.8
127.7
113.6
125.2
(i)
Refer to non-GAAP measures on page 20 of (Management’s Discussion & Analysis) for definition.
(ii)
Includes results of discontinued operations.
(iii) After tax, but before interest, calculated on average month-end net assets employed. Excludes restructuring and other related costs.
(iv) Total assets, less net cash, future tax assets, assets held for sale and non-interest bearing liabilities.
operating
earnings before
restructuring and
other related Costs
45.3% Meat Products
58.6% Bakery Products
(3.9%) Agribusiness
total assets
by Group
52.0% Meat Products
27.5% Bakery Products
10.1% Agribusiness
10.4% Not Allocated
sales by Group
66.4% Meat Products
29.0% Bakery Products
4.6% Agribusiness
domestic vs.
international sales
71.6% Domestic
14.7% U.S.
13.7% Other International
2007 a nnua l report
1
Transforming Our Company
By 2010 Maple Leaf will be a focused, consumer packaged food
company, with significantly higher earnings through growth in our
value-added meat, meals and bakery businesses. Here are some
highlights of this transformation.
Strategy
refocus our
business model
1
2
increase scale
and efficiency
3
drive innovation
and market Growth
•
Consolidate our protein businesses
into one meat company
• Sell our animal nutrition business
•
•
Reduce hogs raised by 50%
Reduce hogs processed
annually by 43% consolidating
six processing plants into one
Since we began our transformation
in late 2006, we have sold our animal
nutrition business, closed four sub-scale
meat processing plants and largely
restructured our hog production
operations. By the end of 2009 we will
have a tightly integrated protein business,
with our fresh pork operations supplying
raw materials for our higher margin
value-added meat and meals businesses.
This will substantially reduce the
currency and commodity exposure that
have overshadowed the underlying value
in this business.
•
•
•
•
Double-shift Brandon pork plant
to realize economies of scale
Increase capacity in our value-added
meat, meals and bakery businesses
Invest approximately $280 million in
capital improvements in 2008 across
our bakery and protein businesses
Implement shared services structure
to reduce complexity and costs
We are stepping up our capital program
to raise the efficiency and scale of our
plants, ensuring that we are globally
competitive regardless of currency
influences. This means investing in
new plants and warehousing capacity,
significant expansions in others,
and closing sub-scale facilities.
We are also implementing a shared
services organization to simplify our
overhead structure.
•
•
•
Build world-class food
innovation centre
Expand in higher growth, higher
margin markets by adding value
across all our product lines
Increase investment in brands
to maintain our strong market
leadership across all categories
Realizing our transformation requires
a step-change in innovation in higher
value segments of the market. We will
complete construction of our food
centre in early 2009, bringing together
our product development teams in
a world-class facility. We are expanding
into new categories like sandwiches
and chilled meals, broadening our
strong position in premium nutrition and
specialty bakery categories, and expect
to launch over 120 new products in 2008.
2
M a ple lea f foods
bakery products Group
•
fresh breads, rolls and ethnic breads
meat products Group
•
processed meats
•
•
•
•
bagels, croissants and morning goods
premium artisan bakery products
frozen par-baked and fully-baked goods
•
•
•
fresh pasta and sauces
chilled and frozen ready-to-cook products
chilled ready-to-serve products
value-added fresh pork, poultry
and turkey products
agribusiness Group
•
rendering operations
•
•
biodiesel production
hog production
Outlook
incremental earnings Growth
Our transformation plan for our new protein business model is expected
to recover earnings impacts of $100 million related to currency changes
by the end of 2009. In addition, we will benefit from earnings growth
in our bakery businesses and other cost-reduction initiatives.
“ Through this transformation we will unlock significant capital in our balance sheet to re-invest in our core strategies.
We will have less exposure to currency and commodities. We will have less volatility in our earnings. Our business
will be simpler, more focused and easier for people to understand. We will have the benefit of higher growth rates
and stronger brands, backed up by a heavier emphasis on innovation. We will have more control over our destiny,
with every intention to pursue a more global growth agenda.”
Michael McCain,
President and CEO
long-term Financial Goals
11.5%
15%
Long Term Earnings Per Share Growth
Return on Net Assets
2007 a nnua l report
3
segemented operating results
protein group
(In millions of Canadian dollars)
meat produCts Group
Sales
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Total Assets
aGribusiness Group
Sales
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Total Assets
total protein Group
(In millions of Canadian dollars)
Sales
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Total Assets
Operating Groups
2007
2006
% change
3,458
90
1,560
241
(8)
303
2007
3,699
82
1,863
3,746
74
1,552
245
(2)
703
(8%)
21%
1%
(2%)
(217%)
(57%)
2006
% change
3,991
72
2,254
(7%)
15%
(17%)
The Meat Products Group includes consumer foods, value-added pork, poultry and turkey products, and global meat sales
operations. The Agribusiness Group comprises hog production and rendering operations.
Bakery products group
(In millions of Canadian dollars)
Sales
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Total Assets
2007
1,511
117
823
2006
1,334
101
811
% change
13%
16%
2%
The Bakery Products Group comprises Maple Leaf’s 88.0% ownership in Canada Bread Company, Limited (“Canada Bread”)
a producer of fresh, frozen and branded value-added bakery products, including frozen par-baked bakery products, and specialty
pasta and sauces.
4
M a ple lea f foods
letter from the chairman
G. Wallace F. McCain, Chairman
dear fellow shareholders:
I am pleased to report that the Board’s
strong ‘culture of involvement’ continued
this past year. Through continual
communication with management and
active participation in Board and
Committees meetings and strategy
sessions, our Board remains openly and
actively engaged in the present and future
of our Company.
We count as a major accomplishment our
involvement in the complex and
fundamental transformation of our protein
business that commenced in 2007.
Oversight of this significant change
initiative was likely our largest and most
important contribution last year. By the
end of 2009, we expect refocusing this
business will step change our earnings
and reduce the impact of the high
Canadian dollar and commodity markets
on our protein business. Management is
doing an exceptional job of leading this
process with precision. The Board’s role
as we implement the required changes
is as important now as when the strategy
was being formed. We receive detailed
briefings at every Board meeting on
progress and challenges to ensure that
initiatives are sufficiently resourced, that
issues are resolved, and that we are
meeting critical timelines.
Last year we approved a 52% increase
in capital investments, which will increase
the Company’s competitive positioning,
drive innovation and fuel growth in new
geographic markets and product
categories. With the sale of non-core
businesses over the past year we have
a stronger balance sheet than ever before.
Management’s execution of the sale
of the animal nutrition business and
non-core hog production operations has
been exceptional. Although we paid down
debt in 2007, we plan to redeploy some
of this capital to support acquisitions
down the road that support our global
growth in value-added bakery and protein.
The fact that Maple Leaf was able to
achieve steady earnings growth in
2007 – in the face of unprecedented food
inflation and major change initiatives
– speaks volumes to the correctness
of our strategies, careful execution, and
the dedication and skill of our thousands
of people who live and breathe this
business. On behalf of all shareholders,
thank you to our 23,000 employees, and to
our directors for your diligence, insights,
and passion to see our company grow and
prosper. 2008 will be another year of major
change, drawing on the experience in
business transformation that the Board
brings to the process. We are well on
track to achieve what shareholders want
– a stronger more profitable company
with exciting growth opportunities ahead.
Sincerely,
G. Wallace F. McCain
chairman
2007 a nnua l report
5
message to shareholders
In Every Home
Michael H. McCain, President and CEO
fellow shareholders
Last year was a year of change, a year
of volatility and a year where we laid the
foundation for our future. It was also
a year where we exceeded our financial
targets and accomplished all of our 2007
strategic goals in the midst of a complex
business transformation. We made
remarkable headway in one of the most
unpredictable years the food industry
has ever experienced. Climbing wheat
(up 37%), corn (up 42%) and soy prices
(up 46%) resulted in soaring worldwide
input costs and food inflation; further
strengthening of the Canadian dollar
increased the already monumental
challenges faced by domestic
manufacturing and export industries;
and increased competition in the Canadian
retail grocery sector fuelled intense price
pressure on suppliers to reduce costs.
So how did Maple Leaf perform? In the
midst of turbulent markets and major
transformation in our protein business,
our stock rose 20% in 2007, outperforming
the S&P/TSX Composite Index that rose
7% and the S&P 1500 Food Index that
increased 8%. We achieved 15% growth
in adjusted operating earnings and a 34%
increase in adjusted earnings per share.
While a solid performance, it absolutely
does not reflect our goals and full potential,
nor does it include any benefits to come
from the dramatic changes underway
in our protein business. We continue to
expect this restructuring alone to yield
an incremental $100 million in operating
earnings by the end of 2009, not including
profit growth in our other businesses. So
we are satisfied with our 2007 performance
and very confident about our ability to
step-change shareholder return through
the transformational business changes
that are part of our “Destination 2010”.
Here are more details as we look
back on 2007 (all earnings exclude
restructuring and other related costs,
certain non-recurring tax adjustments
and discontinued operations):
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sales were $5.2 billion compared with
$5.3 billion in 2006
Adjusted earnings from operations
increased 15% to $199 million
Adjusted earnings per share increased
to $0.51 from $0.38 last year
Operating cash flow from continuing
operations increased 14% to $123 million
Capital expenditures increased
52% to $237 million
Return on net assets was
6.7% compared to 5.6% last year
Share price at year end was $14.85;
outperforming the S&P Food Products
Index by 14%
6
M a ple lea f foods
We are satisfied with our 2007 performance and very confident
about our ability to step-change shareholder return through
the transformational business changes that are part
of our “Destination 2010”.
Overall, the Company continued
to generate strong cash flow, with
$123 million in operating cash flow
from continuing operations in 2007.
We increased our capital expenditures
by 52% to $237 million; this is a critical
element of our plan to adjust our Canadian
operations to the new currency reality.
Through these investments we are
increasing the efficiency and scale of our
plants, reducing costs and improving our
competitiveness. Capital projects must
pass intense scrutiny and generate
satisfactory returns for shareholders, and
are an essential part of our transformation.
In addition, we invested approximately
$50 million on acquisitions in the bakery
business to extend our product and
geographic diversification, largely in the
United Kingdom. We ended the year with
a very strong balance sheet reflected in
a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of 2:2, benefiting
from the sale of our animal nutrition
business for $525 million, the proceeds
of which were used to pay down near-term
debt. We expect to redeploy this capital
in the next few years with significant
investments behind our new vision.
In our Bakery Products Group, adjusted
earnings from operations for the year
increased by 16% to $117 million compared
to $101 million in 2006, including the
contribution of acquisitions in the
United Kingdom. While commodity prices
for wheat and other grains were
at historically high levels, the Company
successfully implemented cost reduction
initiatives and increased pricing to offset
the continued rise in input costs.
In our Meat Products Group, adjusted
earnings from operations for the year
increased by 21% to $90 million, mainly
driven by improvements in the fresh pork
and poultry businesses. Operating
efficiencies in both these businesses
combined with improved industry
processor margins in pork more than
offset the impact of the strengthening
Canadian dollar in the year. While this
was a positive trend, comparisons are off
a low base of earnings in 2006, and protein
results have yet to materially benefit from
any of the strategic initiatives underway.
In our Agribusiness Group, adjusted
earnings from operations for the year
declined to a loss of $8 million compared
to a loss of $3 million in 2006. Rising feed
costs, lower hog prices, a strong
Canadian dollar, and increased mortality
as a result of an industry outbreak
of porcine circovirus resulted in lower hog
production margins. Losses in the farming
operation were mitigated by the increased
contribution of rendering and biodiesel
operations, benefiting from strong
commodity and oil prices.
2007 a nnua l report
7
Everyday
The progress we made in 2007 attests to our collective skill
at managing complex organizational change. We are well down
the path to achieve this transformation.
h e a l t h y n u t r i t iou s f r e s h & p r e pa r e d
creating a gloBally
adMired, value-added Meat,
Meals and Bakery coMpany.
Looking back before the meteoric rise
in the Canadian dollar, we had built
a business that was well positioned
to deliver strong earnings. However
the world changed – a 46% rise in the
Canadian dollar since 2002 has resulted
in an annualized loss of competitiveness
of approximately $135 million. In last
year’s annual report, we wrote about
our new vision for the future and how
we are making radical changes in our
protein business to reposition it for
success. We also elaborated on value
creation strategies to drive increased
top-line growth in our fresh and frozen
bakery businesses.
The progress we made in 2007 attests
to our collective skill at managing complex
organizational change. We are well down
the path to achieve this transformation,
a journey we call Destination 2010.
The focus of these activities is to:
•
•
•
Restructure our protein operations
to secure a low cost supply of high
quality meat for our value-added
meat and meals businesses and
significantly reduce our currency
and commodity exposure.
Drive sales and margin growth
in value-added bakery and protein
markets through product and packaging
innovation and expansion into new
categories and geographies.
Increase capital investment to
improve manufacturing and distribution
efficiencies and create a cost structure
that is competitive with large U.S.
food manufacturers.
8
M a ple lea f foods
h e a l t h y n u t r i t io u s f r e s h & p r e pa r e d
here are the highlights
of what we achieved
last year:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sold our non-core animal nutrition
business for gross proceeds
of $525 million
Invested over $237 million in capital
projects to reduce costs and add
capacity in our manufacturing and
distribution network
Recognized as one of Canada’s 10 Most
Admired Corporate Cultures
Launched more than 100 new products
in our protein and bakery businesses
Started construction on our new food
innovation centre, expected to be
completed in early 2009
Achieved major growth in our U.K.
business, establishing it as a leading
specialty bakery
•
Materially offset raw material inflation
through price increases
•
•
•
•
•
•
Diversified our fresh bakery
business into the sweet goods and
sandwich markets
Double-shifted front-end processing
at our Brandon pork plant, enabling the
closure of two older facilities
Established a modern, scale plant
in Ontario with capacity to support
growth in value-added, packaged meat
and meals
Substantially restructured our hog
production operations, which was
completed in early 2008
Increased capacity utilization in our
poultry and processed meats
network through the closure of four
sub-scale facilities
Laid the groundwork to create a shared
services organization to streamline
and improve the efficiency of core
business processes
2007 a nnua l report
9
Everywhere
Our five key value drivers provide the platform to increase
profitability and earnings stability, and drive top-line growth
through product and geographic expansion.
Fa m i l y F r i e n d s Hom e S c ho ol “ on t h e g o ”
We have a clear path to add over
$100 million in incremental operating
earnings on an annualized basis by the end
of 2009 through our protein reorganization.
We started down this path in late 2006
and we are on track to achieve our goals.
While 2008 will be another year of intense
change, we expect the bulk of major
projects will be completed this year and
to start seeing the financial rewards
of our efforts as we head into 2009.
Building value –
the five key drivers
Our path to step-change shareholder
value consists of five key value drivers.
They provide the platform to increase
profitability and earnings stability, and
drive top-line growth through product
and geographic expansion.
•
•
•
Restructuring our Protein Business
Driving Growth in Fresh Bakery
Fix to Grow in Frozen Bakery
Value Creation in Value-Added
•
Meat and Meals
•
Expansion in U.K. Bakery
1. Restructuring our Protein Business.
Our strategy is straightforward – reduce
our currency and commodity exposure
and increase profitability by downsizing
our hog production and fresh pork
operations, converting them from
independent businesses to an internal
supplier of high quality pork to support
growth in our more stable and profitable
packaged meat and meals business.
Last year we sold our animal nutrition
business, significantly restructured our
hog production operations and improved
the scale and efficiency of our pork
processing plant in Brandon, Manitoba
by doubling the hogs processed.
10
M a ple lea f foods
five key drivers
• Restructuring Our
Protein Business
• Driving Growth
in Fresh Bakery
• Fix to Grow
in Frozen Bakery
• Value Creation in
Value-Added Meat
and Meals
• Expansion in
U.K. Bakery
Fa m i l y F r i e n d s Hom e S c ho ol “ on t h e g o ”
After the first quarter of 2008, we expect
to reduce the number of hogs we raise to
750,000 compared to 1.5 million in 2006 and
have largely restructured this business.
In 2008, we will complete the second-shift
expansion at the Brandon pork processing
plant, creating one scale facility where
five previously existed, and will have
sold or transitioned our remaining pork
processing operations. We are intensifying
our product innovation focus to identify
new categories where we can add value
to the fresh pork and poultry we process.
2. Driving Growth in Fresh Bakery.
Over the past four years we have realized a
compound annual growth rate in operating
earnings of 24% in the fresh bakery
business. We benefit from a product mix
that is weighted towards higher value
bakery products, such as whole grains,
organics and specialty breads. Our focus
is to manage food inflation through cost
reduction initiatives and responsible
pricing, but also to accelerate top line
growth by broadening into new categories.
In particular we are focused on expansion
in fresh sandwiches – a natural for
a company which manufactures meat
and bread products – and the sweet goods
market. We have significantly increased
our expertise, production capabilities, and
market penetration through acquisitions
in both categories. In 2008 we will be
integrating these acquisitions and
concentrating our efforts on product
innovation to add excitement and
consumer appeal to mainstream sandwich
and sweet goods products. In our fresh
pasta and sauce business, we are
continuing our market expansion in the
U.S. and Mexico, adding new products like
NutriWise whole grain pastas under the
strong Olivieri brand.
2007 a nnua l report
11
Every taste
B r e a k fa s t B ru nc h Lu nch Snack s Di n n er
3. Fix to Grow in Frozen Bakery.
The North American frozen bakery
industry, including products like bagels,
hearth breads, artisan breads, rolls
and croissants that are sold mostly
through in-store bakeries, is an attractive
market where we have important
strengths. These include high speed lines,
scale plants, leadership in par-baked
breads and rolls, and large retail and
foodservice customers. However there
are challenges, including industry
fragmentation, low capacity utilization,
and rising input costs that have impacted
our profitability. We have made huge
strides in reducing our cost structure,
the results of which were reflected
in improved financial results last year.
In 2008, we will be implementing more
network changes and sharpening our
customer focus to build relationships
that complement our product expertise,
geographic and product innovation
capabilities – in short, better deeper
relationships with fewer customers.
Once we have restored profitability
in the base business we plan to grow
this business through capital investment
and acquisitions.
4. Value Creation in Value-Added Meat
and Meals. As the growth engine of our
Protein Group, we are placing our
emphasis on increasing top-line growth
and margins in processed meat and the
chilled meals market, which is growing
at a rate of over 20%. First, we are
investing to establish a low cost, efficient
manufacturing and distribution network
with the capacity to support growth.
In 2007 this involved the construction
or expansion of five plants/distribution
centres and the closure of four sub-scale
meat processing facilities. Last year over
31% of our capital investment was in
this business. Second, we are vastly
accelerating our innovation goals.
12
M a ple lea f foods
B r e a k fa s t B ru nc h Lu nch Snack s Di n n er
New products typically deliver higher
sales and margins and we are targeting
the launch of over 50 new products in
2008. While our major focus is on the
chilled meals category and developing
products that add value to the fresh pork
and poultry we process internally, our
innovation activities also include new
packaging ideas and working closely with
our customers to develop exciting new
products that differentiate them with
consumers. Finally, in the face of ongoing
food inflation, we are working with our
customers to prudently raise prices.
5. Expansion in U.K. Bakery.
Our U.K. Bakery business is now
a material earnings contributor and an
important global growth platform for our
Bakery Products Group. Over the past two
years we have quadrupled the size of this
business through acquisitions and organic
growth. With three more acquisitions
in 2007, we further consolidated the
specialty bakery industry and expanded
our presence in new markets – premium
hearth and artisan breads. We now have
leading market shares in several specialty
bakery categories including bagels,
croissants, artisan breads and in-store
bakery breads and rolls, supported
by eight plants across England. We
invested $19 million in 2007 to expand
our manufacturing capacity in croissants,
bagels and in-store bakery products
to support market expansion in the U.K.
and Europe. While this business has also
been impacted by the sharp rise in wheat
and dairy input costs, it is mitigating
these influences through a combination
of cost reduction initiatives and
increased pricing. In 2008, the focus will
be on organizational integration, driving
costs out, and tapping into the breadth
of our significantly larger business
to deliver more products and services
to our customers.
2007 a nnua l report
13
Everyway
Attracting and developing leaders at all levels of the
organization lies at the heart of building an agile culture where
people are empowered to think and act to drive positive change.
P or k Pa s t a C h ic k e n B r e a d B e e f B a g e l s
Leadership. Our workplace safety record
continued its seventh consecutive year
of improvement in lost time accidents.
Since establishing a comprehensive
workplace health and safety scorecard
in 2005, we have benchmarked our
performance annually and in 2007
achieved a 33% improvement across
all Maple Leaf operations. We are also
rigorously tracking employee engagement
and responding to issues to create
a better workplace. Our Six Sigma
professionals are at the forefront
of leading change projects to success
employing their expertise in analysis,
project and change management.
Successfully completing these five major
initiatives will add incremental value well
beyond the $100 million resulting from the
protein reorganization and position our
Company for stable, higher returns.
investing in our dna
While our businesses must be flexible
to changing market dynamics, our
commitment to building a values-focused
culture through leadership development
and continuous improvement is
unwavering. We are a company that
prides itself on attracting and developing
leaders at all levels in the organization.
It lies at the heart of building an agile
culture where people are empowered
to think and act to drive positive change.
In 2007, we invested in over 7,500 person
days of learning and development in Direct
Personal Leadership, Leading Innovation,
Manufacturing Excellence, Sales
Excellence, Six Sigma, and Project
14
M a ple lea f foods
P or k Pa s t a C h ic k e n B r e a d B e e f B a g e l s
health, environMental
and social iMperatives
As a large food company, there are major
health, environmental and social issues
that go beyond short-term profitability
that must shape our business if we are
to realize a sustainable future. On the
environmental front, we are undertaking
multiple initiatives in conjunction with
key customers to reduce packaging and
improve its recyclability, track our
greenhouse gas emissions and the miles
it takes to produce and deliver food
products. Increasingly and importantly,
sound environmental practices are
becoming a key component of competitive
advantage. In 2008, we are undertaking
a comprehensive planning process to
measure our environmental footprint,
coordinate cross-company mitigation
activities and define our longer-term
environmental objectives. In short –
moving beyond compliance to
self-directed environmental action.
On the health front, nutrition
is a fundamental element of our innovation
strategies. Across our portfolios we
have a range of products that provide
consumers with added nutritional benefits
including reduced sodium and the
additional of healthy ingredients like
inulin, fibre and Omega 3. Our Dempster’s
brand is synonymous with premium
nutrition in the fresh bread market; our
Maple Leaf Simply Fresh products deliver
reduced sodium choices; and we are
providing consumers the benefit of whole
grains in fresh pasta and in-store bakery
products under our respective NutriWise
and Wholesome Harvest brands. Aligning
with our philanthropy strategy to leverage
our capabilities and expertise to deliver
nutritious food products to those in need,
we generously donated meat and bread
products last year and supported the
positive contributions of our employees
to local community initiatives.
2007 a nnua l report
15
outlook
We are a significantly stronger company than a year ago, with
solid and achievable value creation strategies that will step-change
our financial results.
Richard A. Lan
Michael H. McCain
Michael H. Vels
J. Scott McCain
suMMary
We are a significantly stronger
company than a year ago, with solid
and achievable value creation strategies
that will step-change our financial results.
While Maple Leaf currently trades
at a discount to our peer group in the
consumer packaged goods sector, we
believe that our transformation will result
in market valuations more in line with the
expectations of a consumer packaged
goods company focused in meat, meals
and bakery products. It is up to us to
complete the changes underway and
deliver the earnings potential that
our plan is capable of.
16
M a ple lea f foods
In the year to come, we are going
to substantially complete most of the
large remaining projects in our protein
transformation. While 2007 was
a year of improved profitability and
major accomplishments, the passion
of thousands of amazing people and their
disciplined approach to management
and change gives us the confidence
to look for much greater things ahead.
Destination 2010!
Michael H. McCain
president and chief
executive officer
Richard A. Lan
chief operating officer,
food group
Michael H. Vels
executive vice-president
and chief financial officer
J. Scott McCain
president and chief operating
officer, agribusiness group
our brand family
2007 a nnua l report
17
Financial Statements
for the year 2007
19 Results of Operations 22 Operating Segments 22 Operating Review 23 Meat Products Group 24 Agribusiness Group
25 Bakery Products Group 25 Company Reorganization 28 Acquisitions and Divestitures 30 Capital Resources and Liquidity
31 Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments 32 Share Capital and Dividends 32 Environment 33 Risk Factors
37 Critical Accounting Estimates 38 Changes in Accounting Policies 38 Recent Accounting Prenouncements
39 Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting 39 Summary of Quarterly Results
40 Forward-Looking Statements 41 Management’s Statement of Responsibility 41 Auditors’ Report to the Shareholders
42 Consolidated Financial Statements 46 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
70 Corporate Governance and Board of Directors 72 Senior Management and Officers 75 Corporate Information
18
M a ple lea f foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
the Business
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (“Maple Leaf” or the “Company”) is a leading Canadian value-added meat, meals and bakery company
committed to delivering quality food products to consumers around the world. Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, the Company employs
approximately 23,000 people at its operations across Canada and in the United States, Europe and Asia.
overview
In 2007 earnings from continuing operations before restructuring and other related costs (“Adjusted Operating Earnings”) (i) increased
by 15.2% to $199.1 million (2006: $172.8 million) and adjusted earnings per share from continuing operations (“Adjusted EPS from Continuing
Operations”) (i) increased 34.2% to $0.51 per share (2006: $0.38 per share). Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
(“Basic EPS from Continuing Operations”) (i) decreased 12.5% to $(0.18) per share (2006: $(0.16) per share). All figures are reported
in Canadian dollars except as otherwise specified.
In 2006 the Company announced and began execution of a new strategic direction to refocus on its value-added meat, meals and bakery
business. This strategy, formulated in response to changes in the Company’s competitive position as a result of the strengthening
of the Canadian dollar, is expected to be materially complete by the end of 2009. Results of operations during 2007 include significant
costs, investments and other impacts related to the first full year of execution of the new strategy. These impacts have been separately
disclosed, where appropriate, in order to provide a clearer assessment of underlying Company results. This has required the use
of non-GAAP measures in the Company’s disclosures which Management believes to provide the most appropriate basis on which
to evaluate operating results.
During 2007, in addition to significant internal change activities related to execution of its strategy, the Company was materially affected
by unprecedented increases in the price of key inputs to its manufacturing operations, including wheat, corn, other grains and fuel costs.
Management believes that these impacts, which must be offset by increasing the prices of the Company’s products or reducing costs,
reinforce the new strategy including downsizing or exiting from product categories in which the Company has limited pricing power,
or is unduly exposed to commodity and currency effects.
selected Financial inFormation
Following is a summary of audited financial information for the three years ended December 31, 2007:
(Millions of dollars except “EPS” information)
Sales
Adjusted operating earnings (i)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Net earnings
Basic EPS
Diluted EPS
Basic EPS from continuing operations, as reported
Diluted EPS from continuing operations, as reported
Adjusted EPS from continuing operations (i)
Total assets
Net debt (i)
Return on net assets (RONA) (i)
Cash flow from continuing operations
Cash dividends per share
(i)
Refer to non-GAAP measures on Page 20.
2007
5,209.6
199.1
(23.2)
207.1
1.63
1.59
(0.18)
(0.18)
0.51
2,998
855
6.7%
122.8
0.16
$
$
$
$
$
$
2006
5,324.8
172.8
(20.0)
4.5
0.04
0.03
(0.16)
(0.16)
0.38
3,276
1,213
5.6%
107.4
0.16
$
$
$
$
$
$
2005
5,554.8
201.0
65.4
94.2
0.74
0.72
0.52
0.50
0.59
2,928
1,062
7.0%
217.9
0.16
$
$
$
$
$
$
2007 a nnua l report
19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
non-Gaap measures
The Company reports its financial results in accordance with Canadian GAAP. However, the Company has included certain non-GAAP
financial measures and ratios in this analysis which Management believes provide useful information in measuring the financial
performance and financial condition of the Company. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by Canadian GAAP
and therefore may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, nor should they be
construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
a) adjusted Operating earnings
”Adjusted Operating Earnings” is defined as earnings from continuing operations before restructuring and other related costs.
Management believes that this is the most appropriate basis on which to evaluate operating results, as restructuring and other related
costs are not representative of continuing operations. Following is a reconciliation of earnings from operations as reported in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements to Adjusted Operating Earnings.
Operating Earnings Reconciliation
(Millions of dollars)
Earnings from operations, as reported
Restructuring and other related costs
Adjusted Operating Earnings
2007
76.8
122.3
199.1
$
$
2006
109.6
63.2
172.8
$
$
2005
187.8
13.2
201.0
$
$
b) adjusted eps frOm COntinuing OperatiOns
“Adjusted EPS from Continuing Operations” excludes restructuring and other related costs, net of taxes and minority interest, and certain
non-recurring taxation adjustments. Management believes that this is the most appropriate basis on which to evaluate financial results,
as the taxation adjustment and restructuring and other related costs are not representative of continuing operations.
EPS Reconciliation
(Per share)
Reported Basic EPS from continuing operations
Restructuring and other related costs, net of tax
Tax benefit from lower future tax rates (i)
Tax benefit related to animal nutrition business (ii)
U.S. tax adjustment, net of minority interest (iii)
Adjusted EPS from continuing operations
2007
(0.18)
0.81
(0.08)
(0.04)
—
0.51
$
$
2006
(0.16)
0.37
—
—
0.17
0.38
$
$
2005
0.52
0.07
—
—
—
0.59
$
$
(i)
(ii)
During 2007 the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $9.9 million related to the enactment of lower future tax rates.
In Q2 2007 the Company recorded a non-recurring tax benefit of $5.1 million related to the sale of its animal nutrition business.
(iii)
In Q3 2006 the Company recorded a non-recurring tax expense of $21.2 million to write-down future tax assets that originated in 2006 and earlier years related to its U.S. frozen
bakery business.
C) return On net assets (“rOna”)
RONA is calculated by dividing tax-effected earnings from continuing operations before restructuring and other related costs and before
interest by average monthly net assets. Net assets are defined as total assets less cash, future tax assets and non-interest bearing
liabilities. Management believes that this is the most appropriate way to reflect financial performance relative to assets employed.
d) earnings befOre interest, tax, depreCiatiOn and amOrtizatiOn (“ebitda”)
EBITDA is calculated as earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs and before interest and income taxes plus
depreciation and intangible amortization. EBITDA also includes a pro forma adjustment to reflect prior 12 months earning for acquisitions.
e) net debt
Net debt is calculated as long-term debt and bank indebtedness, less cash of $28.2 million.
20
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
risinG input prices
“Food for fuel” initiatives sponsored by the United States Government have resulted in increasing demand for grains, in particular corn,
that are used for ethanol production and diminishing land set aside for other crops such as wheat. Combined with strong demand from
export markets and shortfalls in world crops, this has resulted in unprecedented increases in the prices of commodities including wheat,
corn, barley and soybeans, all of which are inputs into or affect the Company’s operations. Consequently in 2007 the input costs for
a number of the Company’s businesses have increased dramatically.
Increased corn and barley prices result in higher feed costs and therefore cost of production in the Company’s hog production operations.
The market price of hogs has not increased at the same rate as inputs, and as a result hog production earnings have declined significantly
during 2007. The cost of meat and poultry has increased as a result of increased demand in North America, exports to areas such as Asia
and increases in poultry feed costs, but livestock prices have not yet responded fully to the increased cost of grains. The Company has
limited ability to offset cost increases in the prices of its fresh meat as these prices are influenced by world commodity markets.
Increased fresh meat and poultry prices affect the Company’s further processed meat and meals businesses, but the Company in general
has the ability to recover these cost increases in the price of its finished products. These price increases do not always precisely track
increases in input and inflationary costs, but over time the Company is generally able to fully offset these increases.
The scale and speed of wheat price increases in 2007 that have continued during 2008, have materially increased the cost of production in
the Company’s bakery operations. When combined with inflationary cost increases related to the fixed costs of the bakery and distribution
operations, Management has had to increase prices significantly and find ways to improve efficiencies in the Bakery Products Group to
offset these cost increases.
The following table outlines the change in some key commodity indicators that have impacted the Company’s business and
financial results:
Price of a Market Hog (CAD per hog) (ii)
Price of a Market Hog (USD per hog) (ii)
Wheat (USD per bushel) (iii)
Corn (USD per bushel) (iii)
Soybeans (USD per bushel) (iii)
At December 31 (i)
2007
93.32
94.50
10.36
4.56
12.14
$
$
$
$
$
2007
125.76
116.94
6.41
3.80
8.72
$
$
$
$
$
Annual Averages
2006
Change
$
$
$
$
$
131.14
115.62
4.67
2.67
6.00
(4.1)%
1.1 %
37.2 %
42.2 %
45.5 %
$
$
$
$
$
2005
148.52
122.50
3.55
2.14
6.13
(i)
Spot prices for the week ended December 28, 2007 based on CME or WCB depending on region (Source: USDA).
(ii) % change in live hog price calculated using 5-day average of CME or WCB depending on region (Source: USDA).
(iii) % change in average price calculated using daily close prices (Source: Bloomberg, CBOT).
impact oF currency
Since 2005 the Canadian dollar has materially strengthened against most world currencies, and in particular the U.S. dollar, and in 2007
reached parity with the U.S. dollar. This change has had significant impacts on the Company’s relative competitiveness, particularly
in its export, international and domestic commodity-based businesses, when compared with its U.S.-based competitors. The principal
effects of these changes were experienced in 2005 through 2007. The businesses most affected by these changes in currency are the hog
production and fresh pork operations as the value of hogs is pegged to the U.S. dollar and fresh pork products compete on a relative price
basis with U.S.-based competitors.
2007 a nnua l report
21
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Conversely, the Company’s domestic branded and private label meat and meals business, and its Bakery Products Group (as defined under
“Operating Segments” below), while affected by these currency changes, have the advantage of strong brands and market shares, which
provide the ability to react to changes in relative competitiveness by reducing costs and investing in brand and innovation support.
As a result, in November 2006, the Company announced a redirection of strategy to reorganize its protein operations to focus on growth
in the higher margin, value-added meat, meals and bakery businesses where the Company has brand and market leadership.
The following table outlines the change in some of the key currency indicators that have affected the Company’s business and
financial results:
Canadian dollar strengthened against the U.S. dollar by:
Canadian dollar strengthened against the Japanese yen by:
(i)
% change in average rate calculated using daily closing rates (Source: Bloomberg).
Average rate change (i)
Between 2007
and 2006
Between 2007
and 2002
5.6%
7.4%
46.2%
38.0%
Since 2002, the Canadian dollar has appreciated 46% against the U.S. dollar. The Company estimates that in isolation this represented
an annualized loss of competitiveness of approximately $100.0 million in primary pork processing business and more than $35.0 million
in hog production business.
operatinG seGments
The Company reports in three segments: the Meat Products Group, the Agribusiness Group and the Bakery Products Group.
The combination of the Company’s Meat Products Group and the Agribusiness Group comprises the Protein Group, which is involved
in producing and marketing animal protein-based products. The Meat Products Group comprises value-added processed packaged
meats; chilled meal entrees and lunch kits; value-added pork, poultry and turkey products; and global meat sales.
The Agribusiness Group operations include swine production and animal by-products recycling.
The Bakery Products Group comprises Maple Leaf’s 88.0% ownership in Canada Bread Company, Limited (“Canada Bread”), a producer
of fresh, frozen and branded value-added bakery products, including frozen par-baked bakery products and specialty pasta and sauces.
operatinG review
Following are sales from continuing operations by business segment for the three years ended December 2007:
sales
($ millions)
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group (i)
Protein Group
Bakery Products Group
Full Year
$
2007
3,458.0
241.0
3,699.0
1,510.6
$
2006
3,745.7
245.4
3,991.1
1,333.7
$
5,209.6
$
5,324.8
Change
(7.7)%
(1.8)%
(7.3)%
13.3 %
(2.2)%
$
2005
4,102.4
226.4
4,328.8
1,226.0
$
5,554.8
(i)
Agribusiness Group excludes the sales of the animal nutrition business which are reported as discontinued operations.
22
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Sales for the year decreased 2.2% to $5.2 billion. Although price increases and acquisitions generated higher sales, sales in total
are lower than the prior year due to the sale or exit of non-core protein operations, and the impact of a stronger Canadian dollar.
The non-core businesses that were sold or exited include international meat trading, soybean trading, and an interest in a joint-venture
hog operation in Quebec.
Following are Adjusted Operating Earnings by business segment for the three years ended December 2007:
adjusted Operating earnings
($ millions)
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group (i)
Protein Group
Bakery Products Group
2007
90.2
(7.8)
82.4
116.7
199.1
$
$
2006
74.4
(2.5)
71.9
100.9
172.8
$
$
Full Year
Change
21.2 %
(216.8)%
14.6 %
15.7 %
15.2 %
2005
59.9
39.8
99.7
101.3
201.0
$
$
(i)
Agribusiness Group excludes the results of the animal nutrition business which are reported as discontinued operations.
meat prOduCts grOup
(value-added processed packaged meats; chilled meal entrees and lunch kits; value-added pork, poultry and turkey products; and global
meat sales)
Meat Products Group sales for the year declined 7.7% to $3.5 billion compared to $3.7 billion last year. This decrease was due primarily
to the exit of global businesses, currency changes, and a reduction in the number of hogs processed to 6.6 million in 2007, down from
6.8 million in 2006.
Adjusted Operating Earnings for the year increased by 21.2% to $90.2 million from $74.4 million in 2006. The increase was principally due
to improved returns in the fresh pork and poultry businesses, benefiting from higher industry processor margins on average throughout
the year, compared to 2006. Following is a summary of publicly quoted North American and Canadian industry pork and poultry processor
margins for the three years ended December 2007. Although the Company’s results are affected by changes in industry processing
margins, differences in the mix of products sold by the Company, such as branded chicken or pork exports, can result in fresh meat returns
differing from industry margins.
Pork Industry Processor Margins (USD per cwt) (i)
Poultry Industry Processor Margins (CAD per kg) (ii)
Annual Averages
2007
3.17
1.45
$
$
2006
3.12
1.25
$
$
Change
1.5%
15.4%
2005
3.25
1.15
$
$
(i)
% change in average pork industry processor margins calculated using daily margins (Source: USDA).
(ii) % change in average poultry industry processor margins calculated using daily margins (Source: EMI Composite Market Indicator).
Note the measurement was revised in 2007 from using the AOCP Indicator, resulting in the revision of 2006 comparable.
The net benefit of industry processor margins, principally in fresh poultry, was further reinforced by improved operating efficiencies
and together offset the impact of the strengthening Canadian dollar during 2007. These operating improvements were driven by benefits
related to the closure of a poultry primary processing facility in Atlantic Canada in the second quarter of 2007, the closure of the Saskatoon
and Winnipeg pork processing plants in the second and fourth quarters of 2007, respectively, and efficiencies from double-shifting
front-end processing at the Brandon, Manitoba primary pork processing plant in the fourth quarter of 2007.
In the value-added further processed meat business, although price increases implemented during 2007 offset rising raw material and
inflationary costs, lags in the timing of such pricing together with significantly increased investment in product development and marketing
resulted in lower earnings compared to 2006. The Company has made significant investments in 2006 and 2007 to fuel expansion in the
2007 a nnua l report
23
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
chilled meals category, and over the past year has established market leadership in this higher growth market segment. In the first quarter
of 2007, the Company launched Maple Leaf Simply Fresh, a new line of fresh, nutritious ready meal solutions. Manufactured at its newly
constructed Brampton, Ontario facility, these products include pork, chicken or beef and vegetables, and carry the Heart and Stroke
Foundation’s Health Check™ symbol. The products are developed using technology that significantly extends shelf life while delivering
fresh taste, low sodium and fat, and high nutrition. Continued rationalization and efficiency improvements in the Company’s value-added
manufacturing and distribution network, including the closure of a red meat facility in Etobicoke, Ontario and consolidation of these
products into the Brampton facility, and consolidation and upgrades of its Western distribution network, are expected to contribute
to future earnings.
A cornerstone of Maple Leaf’s new protein strategy is to reduce the volume of fresh pork it processes to a level that supports internal
raw material requirements for further processed products, consolidated in one scale plant in Brandon, Manitoba. Supporting this strategy,
the Company double shifted the front-end processing at Brandon in early September 2007, reaching its target of 75,000 hogs per week
during the fourth quarter. In 2007 the Company closed two pork plants in Saskatoon and Winnipeg, which processed a combined total
of approximately 1.7 million hogs per year. These changes were significant milestones in the execution of the Company’s strategy.
During 2008 Management intends to invest further capital in the Brandon facility to expand and double-shift the back-end ‘cut’ operations,
invest in further processing ham operations in Winnipeg and proceed with the divestiture of its primary processing facility in Burlington,
Ontario. It is anticipated that once these initiatives are complete by 2009 the Company will process approximately 4.3 million hogs annually.
agribusiness grOup
(swine production and animal by-products recycling)
Agribusiness Group sales for the year decreased 1.8% to $241.0 million from $245.4 million, as the impact of restructuring the hog
production operations more than offset the impact of rising commodity prices on by-product recycling revenues.
Adjusted Operating Earnings in the Agribusiness Group for the year were a loss of $7.8 million compared to a loss of $2.5 million in 2006.
Sharp increases in feed prices and the continuing strength of the Canadian dollar created a very difficult environment and significant
operating losses for hog producers in 2007. Hog production results were also impacted in the first half of the year by an industry-wide
outbreak of porcine circovirus, a disease that affects growth rates and mortality rates of hogs. In 2006, results from hog production
operations were negatively impacted by a one-time adjustment to inventory values of work-in-progress hogs. Hog production earnings
benefited from the effects of short-term hedging, but this was not sufficient to offset the higher cost of feed.
Earnings for the by-products recycling business for 2007 benefited from higher volumes and higher prices for finished products that
correlate to rising commodity prices, particularly soybeans. The Company’s biodiesel operations improved outputs and efficiencies and
benefited from further capital upgrades in 2007.
An element of the Company’s new protein strategy is to restructure the Manitoba hog production operations towards wholly-owned
balanced operations concentrated in proximity to the Brandon primary processing plant, reducing both the total number of hogs produced
and the cost and complexity of the existing operations. This goal was materially achieved in Manitoba in 2007, and during 2008 and 2009
Management will focus on further reducing costs in this business.
In January 2008 the Company sold most of its Ontario hog production operations and almost all of its hog production investments in
Alberta. This, combined with progress in restructuring its operations in Manitoba, represents a significant milestone in the Company’s
strategic plans. This marks the effective completion of the Company’s exit from Alberta and Ontario hog production operations and the
concentration of its production assets into Manitoba. The balance of the hog inventory in Ontario and Alberta will be marketed in the first
quarter of 2008. As a result, after the first quarter of 2008, the annualized number of finished pigs produced by the Company is expected to
reduce to approximately 750,000 hogs compared to 1.3 million produced in 2007. At the end of 2007, the Company effectively owned 20.0%
of the hogs that it processed in its facilities.
Financial results for the animal nutrition business, divested during 2007, have been reported as discontinued operations. Maple Leaf has
retained ownership of two feed mills in Western Manitoba and the operating results and the net assets related to these mills are included
in the Agribusiness Group.
24
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
bakery prOduCts grOup
(fresh, frozen and branded value-added bakery products, including frozen par-baked bakery products; and specialty pasta and sauces)
Bakery Products Group sales for the year increased 13.3% to $1.5 billion. Excluding acquisitions, sales increased by 5.3%, reflecting
increased volumes in the U.K. and price increases across all the bakery businesses.
Adjusted Operating Earnings in the Bakery Products Group for the year increased by 15.7% to $116.7 million compared to $100.9 million
in 2006. This improvement was due primarily to the contribution of acquisitions in the U.K. and improvements in the North American
frozen bakery operations.
Profitability in the fresh bakery and pasta operations decreased slightly over the prior year. The business experienced an unprecedented
rise in wheat costs that was partially mitigated by forward flour purchases earlier in the year and a weaker U.S. dollar. While the Company
was able to secure price increases to largely offset these rising direct input costs, increased spend on marketing initiatives, inflationary
increases in manufacturing costs and an industry-wide volume decline in the fresh bread category had a negative impact on earnings.
Since the beginning of 2008, wheat prices have continued to increase. In order to offset these impacts, further price increases during
2008 will be necessary. The timing of such price increases may not match the increase in wheat prices and other inflationary increases,
but over the medium-term the Company expects to recover these increased costs through increased prices and operating efficiencies.
For the U.K. bakery operations, the benefits of price increases were not sufficient to offset the impact of higher input costs and
investments in promotion and advertising. However, these headwinds were offset by the positive contribution of acquisitions and organic
growth in bagel and other specialty bakery categories. During 2007 the U.K. business, responding to customer needs, invested significantly
in new capacity and operational efficiencies, including installation of a new high speed croissant line at the Maidstone bakery, and
increases in cold storage and production capacity at the Rotherham bagel facility.
The North American frozen bakery operations recorded a solid improvement in Adjusted Operating Earnings against a low prior year
comparative by increasing volumes and prices to offset input cost increases. It also benefited from improved operating efficiencies,
mainly at the Roanoke, Virginia bakery and also completed a large warehouse expansion in Roanoke that has optimized storage capacity
and reduced third-party storage costs and freight.
sale oF animal nutrition Business
On July 20, 2007 Maple Leaf completed the sale of its animal nutrition business to Nutreco Holding BV for gross proceeds of $524.8 million.
Including the impact of a $20.7 million goodwill impairment charge related to the retained operations of the animal nutrition business
and a $5.1 million tax benefit required to be recorded in earnings from continuing operations in the second quarter and the impact of final
closing adjustments, the after-tax adjusted gain on the sale of the business was $204.0 million ($1.60 per share).
Proceeds from the sale of the animal nutrition business were used to pay down long-term debt, strengthening the Company’s balance
sheet to support future expansion of core business lines and potential acquisitions.
The operating results of the animal nutrition business that were sold have been classified as discontinued operations and prior year
amounts have been restated on a comparable basis. Earnings per share from discontinued operations were $1.81 for the year (2006: $0.19).
Included in 2007 earnings were restructuring and other related costs of $2.7 million. In calculating net earnings from discontinued
operations, interest expense has been allocated to these operations assuming a uniform debt-to-equity ratio.
company reorGanization
In October 2006, the Company announced and began a comprehensive strategy to significantly increase the profitability of its Meat
Products and Agribusiness operations by refocusing its growth in the value-added meat and meals businesses. This strategy, formulated
in response to material changes in the Company’s competitive position as a result of the strengthening Canadian dollar, is expected to be
materially complete by the end of 2009.
2007 a nnua l report
25
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
To achieve its objective, the Company is focusing its protein strategy on growing its value-added fresh and further processed meat and
meals businesses. Through integration of its fresh and value-added further processed operations, the Company’s goal is to balance
and optimize the value of all meats that it processes by significantly increasing the raw materials it directs into further processing; by
accelerating new product innovation; establishing a low cost manufacturing base; and reducing the scope of its value chain to the size
required to support its value-added meat businesses.
All components of the protein group, including the feed, hog production and primary processing operations will be sized to support its
value-added fresh and further processed meat businesses. This will result in reducing the number of hogs processed from 7.5 million
to approximately 4.3 million annually. It will result in reducing the number of hogs produced from approximately 1.5 million hogs in 2006
to 750,000 hogs annually. The Company is selling or exiting operations and businesses that do not support this balanced, aligned and
vertically integrated model.
The strategy goes beyond addressing currency challenges alone by seeking to provide significant value creation for the Company and
its shareholders. The goal of the restructuring is to create a simpler, more focused and profitable meat, meals and bakery company, with
significantly less exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and commodity markets. The Company is seeking to build off its considerable
strengths in the higher margin, fresh and further processed meat, meals and bakery businesses through innovation, investment,
and acquisitions.
In 2007 and early 2008, the Company achieved the following milestones towards the transformation:
•
•
Substantially restructured its Manitoba hog production operations towards wholly-owned and balanced operations concentrated
in proximity to the Brandon processing plant.
Entered into transactions to sell all of its wholly-owned hog investments in Alberta and most of its hog production operations in Ontario.
These transactions were completed in Q1 2008.
• Sold the animal nutrition business, except for two feed mills required to meet internal hog requirements, for proceeds of $524.8 million.
•
Double-shifted the front-end “kill” processing at the Brandon pork plant enabling the closure of two older facilities in Saskatoon
and Winnipeg.
• Started construction of a new $12.0 million food innovation centre in Toronto, Ontario, expected to be completed in early 2009.
•
Established a modern scale plant in Brampton, Ontario with capacity to support growth in value-added, packaged meats and meals,
involving investment of approximately $25.0 million in 2007.
• Invested over $40.0 million in capital projects to reduce costs and add capacity in the manufacturing distribution network.
• Increased capacity utilization in the poultry and processed meats networks through closing four sub-scale facilities.
•
Laid the groundwork for a shared services organization to streamline and improve the efficiency of the Company’s core
business processes.
In 2008 and 2009, the following milestones relating to the protein transformation are expected to be completed:
•
Divestiture of the Burlington and Lethbridge pork processing plants and consolidation of all primary pork operations into one fully
double-shifted “cut and kill” facility in Brandon, Manitoba.
• Further manufacturing network optimization in the further processed meats business.
• Complete the distribution network optimization.
• Implement the Company’s shared services structure.
26
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
restructurinG and other related costs
During 2007, the Company recorded restructuring and other related costs of $125.0 million before taxation and $103.7 million after-tax
and minority interest (2006: $64.6 million, $49.9 million after-tax and minority interest) primarily related to the reorganization of its protein
value operations, and including other initiatives in the bakery and value-added meats businesses. Details of these restructuring and other
related costs are as follows:
($ millions)
Protein Group restructuring
Impairment of Ontario and Alberta hog production assets
Impairment of long-lived hog production assets
Goodwill impairment related to retained operations of the animal nutrition business
Retention payments
Poultry plant closure
Impairment of a non-core equity investment
Bakery plant closure
$
Discontinued operations
Total restructuring
Cash incurred and to be incurred
Non-cash
$
$
$
2007
19.6
27.0
36.1
20.7
8.7
6.3
—
3.9
122.3
2.7
125.0
23.2
101.8
125.0
2006
27.6
18.6
—
—
2.0
2.3
7.3
5.5
63.3
1.3
64.6
25.4
39.2
64.6
$
$
$
$
Total-to-date
$
$
$
$
47.2
45.6
36.1
20.7
10.7
8.6
7.3
9.4
185.6
4.0
189.6
48.6
141.0
189.6
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Protein Group restructuring Includes costs of closure of two primary pork processing plants in Saskatoon and Winnipeg, the closure
of a red meat processing facility in Etobicoke, Ontario, severances related to salaried headcount reductions, the exit of non-core
protein operations including international meat trading, soybean trading, and a joint-venture hog production operation in Quebec.
Impairment of Ontario and Alberta hog production assets In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company entered into transactions to
sell most of its Ontario hog production operations and its wholly-owned hog production investments in Alberta. These transactions
resulted in a combined impairment loss of $27.0 million to reduce the carrying value of these assets to fair value less costs to sell.
These sale transactions closed in January 2008 (2006: $18.6 million).
Impairment of long-lived hog production assets The strengthening of the Canadian dollar, escalating input costs and losses on
divestitures of hog production assets in Alberta and Ontario have caused Management to assess the carrying value of its remaining
hog production operations in Manitoba. The Company has concluded that the long-lived assets related to the Manitoba hog
operations have been impaired and consequently recorded an impairment charge of $36.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Goodwill impairment related to retained operations of the animal nutrition business When the assets of the animal nutrition
business were sold, a further $20.7 million of goodwill was, as required by Canadian accounting rules, allocated to Maple Leaf’s
remaining feed and hog operations. The sale of the animal nutrition business placed certain restrictions in the operations of the
two feed mills that were retained by Maple Leaf to supply feed to the Company’s owned hog production operations in Manitoba.
This reduced the assessment of future cash flows related to these remaining feed and hog operations. As a result, the Company
determined that the goodwill allocated to the remaining feed and hog operations was impaired and recorded an impairment charge
of $20.7 million in the second quarter of 2007.
Retention payments These represent incremental compensation incentives put in place to retain certain key personnel in operating
businesses that are impacted by restructuring activities.
Poultry plant closure These charges are the costs of closure, including severance, decommissioning and asset write-downs,
of a primary poultry processing plant in Canard, Nova Scotia.
(vii) Impairment of a non-core equity investment In 2006, the Company wrote down an investment in a non-core flour, feed and rice
milling company in the Caribbean to net realizable value.
(viii) Bakery plant closure These charges represent the costs of closure, including severance, decommissioning and asset write-downs
of closing a bakery in Langley, B.C. and a bagel plant in Toronto, Ontario.
2007 a nnua l report
27
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
As a result of actual experience and costs of completed projects, Management have revised their estimates of total restructuring and
other related costs for 2006 to 2009 to between $275 million and $325 million (of which the cash component is $90.0 million to $110.0 million).
As at December 31, 2007, $189.6 million has been recorded to date. This compares to a range of $140.0 million to $190.0 million estimated
during 2006 (of which the cash component was $50.0 million to $75.0 million). The increase is primarily due to three factors, namely, the
impairment of hog production assets classified as held for sale in Alberta and Ontario, the impairment of long-lived hog production assets
in Manitoba, and the goodwill impairment related to retained operations of the animal nutrition business.
The total amount of restructuring and other related charges is partly dependent on whether certain facilities that are non-core to the
Company strategy will be sold or closed. These estimates include restructuring and other related charges for projects that are anticipated
to occur before the end of 2009, for which the plans are both known to Management and the amounts of restructuring and other related
charges are reasonably quantifiable. These estimates do not include all restructuring projects that will occur during this time period and
may change as the Company implements its restructuring initiatives. As a result, actual restructuring and other related costs over the next
two years may differ materially from what is expressed.
Other inCOme
Other income increased to $4.6 million from $2.6 million in 2006, mainly due to receipt of insurance proceeds in the first quarter.
interest expense
Interest expense for the year increased to $94.1 million compared to $90.2 million last year. The increase is primarily due to an increase
in short-term interest rates. At December 31, 2007, 75.0% of indebtedness was not exposed to interest rate fluctuations (2006: 77.0%).
inCOme taxes
Income tax expense decreased to $0.8 million from $35.8 million in 2006. A reconciliation between statutory tax rates and the Company’s
effective tax rate is set out in Note 21 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Following is a discussion of certain reconciling amounts:
•
•
•
•
•
During the year, the Company recorded reductions of $9.9 million (2006: $3.4 million) to tax expense attributable to changes to future tax
rates that were enacted.
During the year, the Company recorded restructuring and other related costs of $122.3 million (2006: $63.3 million) that had a tax effect
of $20.6 million (2006: $14.3 million).
The restructuring and other related charges included the write-off of goodwill for which there is no corresponding tax recovery.
Accordingly, the tax expense is higher by $7.1 million.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company recorded a tax expense of $21.2 million to write down future tax assets related to its
U.S. frozen bakery business. In 2007, a future tax asset valuation allowance of $5.7 million was recorded against additional tax losses
generated in the year.
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $5.1 million related to outside basis differences on shares
of subsidiaries that were sold as part of the divestiture of the animal nutrition business.
pensiOn inCOme
Pension income for the year was $17.1 million compared to $10.1 million in 2006. Components of pension income are provided in Note 22
of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
acquisitions and divestitures
2008
On January 29, 2008, the Company acquired the shares of Aliments Martel Inc., a leading manufacturer and distributor of sandwiches,
meals and sweet goods based in Quebec, for an initial purchase price of $42.4 million plus contingent consideration of up to $23.0 million
based on financial performance over the next three years.
On January 22, 2008, the Company completed the sale of most of its Ontario hog production operations and on January 29, 2008, the
Company completed the sale of all of its wholly-owned investments in Alberta. Combined proceeds were $10.2 million. Impairment
charges of $27.0 million were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 relating to these sales and were included in restructuring and other
related costs.
28
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
On January 14, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Central By-Products, a by-products recycling business located near
London, Ontario, for cash consideration of $18.0 million subject to normal closing adjustments. This acquisition reflects the Company’s
ongoing commitment to the by-products recycling business.
2007
On August 17, 2007, the Company acquired La Fornaia Ltd. (“La Fornaia”), a leading producer of a range of specialty Italian breads such
as traditional ciabatta, organic breads and crisp breads for total consideration of £18.9 million ($40.3 million). The Company has allocated
£3.7 million ($7.9 million) of the purchase price to the identifiable net assets of La Fornaia at the acquisition date, and £15.2 million
($32.4 million) to goodwill. The Company has not yet finalized the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
During 2006 and 2007, the Company completed certain acquisition and divestiture transactions related to the realignment of its hog
production business in Manitoba. These transactions did not have a significant impact on the financial position of the Company.
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company completed the sale of its European seafood and convenience businesses in Germany.
The sales of these businesses will not have a significant impact on ongoing earnings or cash flows.
On February 26, 2007, the Company acquired 100% ownership in Pâtisserie Chevalier Inc. (“Chevalier”) for $8.2 million. Chevalier is
a leading producer of single-portion snack cake products in Quebec. The Company has allocated $6.4 million of the purchase price to the
identifiable net assets of Chevalier at the acquisition date, and $1.8 million to goodwill. As at December 31, 2007, the Company has not yet
finalized the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
On July 20, 2007, Maple Leaf completed the sale of its animal nutrition business for proceeds of $525 million. The final adjusted after-tax
gain was $204 million ($1.60 per share).
2006
On November 27, 2006, the Company purchased The French Croissant Company Ltd. (“FCC”) and Avance U.K. Limited (“Avance”), two
related bakeries in the U.K. for total consideration of £29.2 million ($64.0 million). FCC produces and markets croissants and specialty
goods across the U.K., and Avance is a leading supplier of fresh, frozen and long-life specialty bakery items. The Company has completed
the purchase price allocation and has allocated $7.5 million to the identifiable net tangible assets of FCC and Avance and $56.5 million
to goodwill and intangibles. The acquired intangible assets include $8.8 million of customer relationships that are being amortized on
a straight-line basis over their useful lives to a maximum of 25 years.
On March 24, 2006, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Harvestime Limited (“Harvestime”), a bakery in Walsall, England
for £1.0 million ($2.0 million). Harvestime is a producer of par-baked breads, rolls and specialty bakery products. As at December 31, 2006,
the Company had finalized the purchase price allocation and goodwill of $0.7 million resulting from the transaction has been included
in the total assets of the Bakery Products Group.
transactions with related parties
On January 16, 2007, the Company purchased 122,900 shares of Canada Bread for $6.5 million increasing the Company’s ownership interest
in Canada Bread from 87.5% to 88.0%.
In August 2006, the Company purchased an additional interest in Cold Springs Farm (“Cold Springs”) for cash consideration of $5.0 million
in cash. In August 2007, the Company purchased the remaining interest in Cold Springs for $10.0 million with $5.0 million paid in cash and
$5.0 million due in the third quarter of 2008. The Company has not yet completed the purchase price allocation.
On October 2, 2006, Canada Bread acquired 50% of the shares of Royal Touch Foods Inc. (“Royal Touch”), a pre-packaged sandwich
supplier based in Etobicoke, Ontario, from a third party, for $3.8 million net of cash acquired of $0.8 million. The investment in Royal Touch
had previously been accounted for on an equity basis by Maple Leaf. In 2007, there were minor adjustments to the purchase price and the
purchase price allocation was completed. Royal Touch will be merged with the newly acquired Martel business during 2008.
2007 a nnua l report
29
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
capital resources and liquidity
The food industry segments in which the Company operates are generally characterized by high sales volume and rapid turnover
of inventories and accounts receivable. In general, accounts receivable and inventories are readily convertible into cash. Investment
in working capital is affected by fluctuations in the prices of raw materials, seasonal and other market-related fluctuations. For example,
although an increase or decrease in pork or grain commodity prices may not affect margins, they can have a material effect on investment
in working capital, primarily inventory and accounts receivable. Due to its diversity of operations, the Company has in the past consistently
generated a strong base level of operating cash flow, even in periods of higher commodity prices and restructuring of its operations.
These operating cash flows provide a base of underlying liquidity that the Company supplements with credit facilities to provide
longer-term funding and to finance fluctuations in working capital levels.
Cash flOw
Total debt, net of cash balances, was $0.9 billion at December 31, 2007 compared to $1.2 billion last year a decrease of $0.3 billion.
The most significant reason for the decline in debt outstanding compared to last year is application of cash received from the sale
of the Company’s animal nutrition business to repay long-term debt.
Operating cash flow for the year was $105.7 million compared to $132.0 million last year, a decrease of $26.3 million. Discontinued
operations of the animal nutrition business accounted for a decrease in cash flow of $41.7 million. The operating cash flow, excluding
discontinued operations, was $122.8 million compared to $107.4 million last year, an increase of $15.4 million. This increase is the result
of favourable contributions from earnings before restructuring charges partially offset by an increased investment in working capital.
Capital expenditures
Expenditures on capital plant and equipment for the year of $236.7 million compared to $155.9 million last year. In 2007, the Company
invested in a number of initiatives to increase manufacturing and distribution efficiencies and capacity expansion in core businesses.
These projects include a substantial expansion in capacity at the U.K. bagel and croissant facilities and the construction of a new
warehouse at the Company’s bakery in Roanoke, Virginia. The Company also invested in the launch of the Maple Leaf Simply Fresh product
line and continued to support this expansion in the chilled meals market through capital investment at its plant in Brampton, Ontario.
Capital investments were also made to support the consolidation of fresh pork processing at the Company’s plant in Brandon, Manitoba.
The Company intends to double-shift the primary pork processing facility in Brandon, Manitoba, and the majority of capital spending
related to this initiative will be spent or committed during 2008.
During the next three years, the Company will be investing considerable amounts of capital and will incur significant implementation
expenses related to the creation of a shared services organization to streamline and improve the efficiency of the Company’s core
business processes.
debt faCilities
The Company’s strategy related to liquidity is to reduce reliance on any single source of credit, maintain sufficient undrawn credit facilities
to provide liquidity and to spread debt maturities over time to reduce refinancing risk. In order to ensure continued access to competitively
priced credit, the Company’s policy is to maintain its primary credit ratios and leverage at levels that provide access to investment grade
credit. In circumstances where the Company determines it is appropriate to reduce leverage, it will use equity or other forms of liquidity
as an additional source of capital.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had available undrawn committed credit of $705.6 million. Primarily due to proceeds from asset sales,
and internal cash flows, at year end the Company had a strong balance sheet, evidenced by improvements in key cash flow measures.
Net debt to EBITDA (i) (net debt to earnings before interest, income taxes, deprecation and amortization) at December 2007 was
2.2x (2006: 3.2x).
(i)
Refer to non-GAAP measures on Page 20.
30
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
At December 31, 2007, the Company had aggregate credit facilities, including subsidiary debt, of $1.8 billion (2006: $2.0 billion), of which
$1.0 billion (2006: $1.4 billion) was utilized (including $120.2 million (2006: $116.7 million) in respect of letters of credit). Subsidiary debt
facilities available amounted to $115.0 million (2006: $148.4 million), of which $94.0 million (2006: $123.9 million) was utilized (including
$8.8 million (2006: $9.4 million) in respect of letters of credit) at year end.
To access competitively priced financing, and to further diversify its funding sources, the Company operates several accounts receivable
financing facilities pursuant to which the Company sells certain accounts receivable to financial institutions. At year end, the Company
had $218.5 million (2006: $241.5 million) trade accounts receivable being serviced under these facilities. These facilities are accounted for
as an off-balance sheet transaction under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Where cost effective to do so, the Company may
finance automobiles, heavy equipment, computers and office equipment with operating lease facilities.
In December 2007, the Company repaid a maturing US$60.0 million note and concurrently settled the related cross-currency swap for
a total payment of CAD$93.2 million.
COntraCtual ObligatiOns
The following table provides information about certain of the Company’s significant contractual obligations as at December 31, 2007:
($ millions)
Long-term debt
Cross-currency swaps related
to long-term debt
Contractual obligations including leases
Total
$
873.2
$
139.3
1,012.5
280.7
Total contractual obligations
$ 1,293.2
$
Payments due by fiscal year
2009
2010
2011
2012
After 2012
$
148.9
$
203.3
$
237.0
$
7.1
$
258.9
8.4
157.3
51.4
36.4
239.7
37.6
55.6
292.6
29.6
$
208.7
$
277.3
$
322.2
$
—
7.1
22.5
29.6
$
38.9
297.8
76.7
374.5
2008
18.0
—
18.0
62.9
80.9
Management is of the opinion that its cash flow and sources of financing provide the Company with sufficient resources to finance
ongoing business requirements and its planned capital expenditure program. Additional details concerning financing are set out in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As at December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
derivatives and other Financial instruments
The Company uses derivatives and other non-derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates and commodity prices (including prices of wheat, feed grains and livestock).
The Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates by using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt and utilizing interest rate
swaps as necessary to achieve the desired proportion of variable to fixed-rate debt. The Company did not have any interest rate swaps
outstanding at the end of 2007 as all interest rate swaps in place were settled during the year, concurrent with repayment of related debt
from proceeds received from the disposal of the animal nutrition business. At December 31, 2007, 75.0% of the Company’s outstanding debt
was not exposed to interest rate movements (2006: 77.0%).
The Company’s foreign exchange risk management includes the use of forward foreign exchange contracts, cross-currency interest
rate swaps and foreign currency-denominated debt to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign exchange rates arising from
transactions in currencies other than the Canadian dollar.
The Company’s meat processing, hog production and bakery operations use various raw materials, mainly hogs, feed grains and wheat.
The Company uses long-term contracts with suppliers and exchange-traded futures and options to reduce price fluctuations in raw
material purchases.
All hedging and derivatives activity is governed by risk management policies that specify the type of allowed hedging instrument, maximum
exposure and the allowable hedge activity. Counterparties to the Company’s non-exchange-traded derivatives are major international
financial institutions with long-term debt ratings of single A or better.
2007 a nnua l report
31
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
If the Company had not entered into these contracts, earnings from operations for the year would have been lower by $13.6 million
(2006: lower by $5.4 million). Without these contracts, interest expense for the year would have been lower by $18.7 million (2006: lower
by $16.2 million).
Since January 1, 2007, all derivatives (whether designated in hedging relationships or not) are carried on the balance sheet at fair value
unless they are exempt from derivative treatment based upon expected purchase, sale or usage requirements. Derivatives are reported as
assets where they have a positive fair value and as liabilities where they have a negative fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair
value of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated in a hedging relationship and on the type of hedging relationship. Prior to
January 1, 2007, derivatives that met hedge accounting criteria were accounted for on an accrual basis. For details on the accounting for
these instruments see Note 12 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
seasonality
The Company is sufficiently large and diversified that seasonal factors within each operation and business tend to offset each other and in
isolation do not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated earnings. For example, pork processing margins tend to be higher
in the last half of the year when hog prices historically decline, and as a result, earnings from hog production operations tend to be lower.
Strong demand for grilled meat products positively affects the fresh and processed meats operations in the summer, while back-to-school
promotions support increased sales of bakery, sliced meats and lunch items in the fall. Higher demand for turkey and ham products occurs
in the fourth quarter and spring holiday seasons.
share capital and dividends
The Company did not repurchase any of its own shares in 2007 and its normal course issuer bid expired in August 2007. During 2006, the
Company repurchased 1,909,600 common shares at an average exercise price of $12.07 per share. The excess of the purchase cost over
the book value of the shares was charged to retained earnings.
In each of the quarters of 2007, the Company declared and paid cash dividends of $0.04 per common share (voting and non-voting).
This represents a total dividend of $0.16 per common share (voting and non-voting) and aggregate dividend payments of $20.8 million
(2006: $20.4 million).
As at January 31, 2008, there were 107,607,971 voting common shares of the Company issued and outstanding and 22,000,000 non-voting
common shares issued and outstanding. The non-voting common shares are convertible into voting common shares on a one-for-one
basis at the option of the holder or holders thereof.
environment
Maple Leaf Foods is committed to maintaining high standards of environmental responsibility and positive relationships in the
communities where the Company operates. Each of its businesses operates within the framework of an environmental policy entitled
“Our Environmental Commitment” that is approved by the Board of Directors’ Environment, Health and Safety Committee. The Company’s
environmental program is monitored on a regular basis by the Committee, including compliance with regulatory requirements, the use of
internal environmental specialists and independent, external environmental experts. The Company continues to invest in environmental
infrastructure related to water, waste and air emissions to ensure that environmental standards continue to be met or exceeded,
while implementing procedures to reduce the impact of operations on the environment. Expenditures related to current environmental
requirements are not expected to have a material effect on the financial position or earnings of the Company. However, there can be no
assurance that certain events will not occur that will cause expenditures related to the environment to be significant and have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Such events could include, but not be limited to, additional
environmental regulation or the occurrence of an adverse event at one of the Company’s locations.
As a large food company, there are health, environmental and social issues that go beyond short-term profitability that Management
believe must shape our business if the Company is to realize a sustainable future. On the environmental front, the Company is undertaking
multiple initiatives in conjunction with key customers to reduce packaging and improve its recyclability, track our greenhouse gas
emissions and the miles it takes to produce and deliver food products. Increasingly and importantly, sound environmental practices
are becoming a key component of maintaining a competitive advantage. In 2008, the Company is undertaking a comprehensive
planning process to measure our environmental footprint, coordinate cross-company mitigation activities and define our longer-term
environmental objectives.
32
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
risk Factors
The Company operates in the food processing sector, and is therefore subject to risks and uncertainties related to these businesses
that may have adverse effects on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. Some of these risks and uncertainties
are outlined below. Prospective investors should carefully review and evaluate the following risk factors together with all of the other
information contained in this report. The risk factors described below are not the only risk factors facing the Company. The Company may
be subject to risks and uncertainties not described below that the Company is not presently aware of or that the Company may currently
deem insignificant.
hOg and pOrk market CyCliCality
The Company’s results of operations and financial condition are partially dependent upon the cost and supply of hogs and the selling
prices for fresh meat products, both of which are influenced by constantly changing market forces of supply and demand over which the
Company has little or no control. These prices, for the most part are denominated in or related to U.S. dollars which adds further variability
due to fluctuations in exchange rates. The North American primary pork processing markets are highly competitive, with major and
regional companies competing in each market. The market prices for pork products regularly experience periods of supply and demand
imbalance, and are sensitive to changes in industry processing capacity. Factors contributing to this cyclicality include the substantial
capital investment and high fixed costs required to manufacture primary pork products efficiently and the significant costs associated with
plant closures. In addition, the supply and market price of live hogs is dependent upon a variety of factors over which the Company has
little or no control, including fluctuations in the size of herds maintained by North American hog suppliers, environmental and conservation
regulations, economic conditions, the relative cost of feed for hogs, weather, livestock diseases and other factors. The Company’s recently
developed protein strategy is designed to reduce certain of these risks by reducing volumes of hogs produced and volume of fresh pork
sold. There can be no assurance that all or part of increased costs experienced by the Company from time to time can be passed along to
consumers of the Company’s products directly or in a timely manner. As a result, there is no assurance that the occurrence of these events
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
prOtein business strategiC transfOrmatiOn
In 2006, in response to a four-year strengthening of the Canadian dollar and challenging global protein markets that impacted the
performance of the Company’s protein value chain operations, primarily in hog production and fresh pork processing, the Company
completed a comprehensive review of its protein-related businesses and operations, with the objective to maximize the profitability of its
meat businesses and recover the loss in competitiveness due to adverse currency movements. As a result, the Company has decided to
focus its strategy in the protein operations on growing its value-added fresh and further processed meat and meals businesses. As part
of this strategy, the Company intends to integrate its fresh and valued-added further processed operations, with the goal of balancing and
optimizing the value of all the meat that it processes through significantly increasing the raw materials it directs into further processing;
increasing its new product innovation; establishing a low cost manufacturing base; and reducing the scope of its value chain to the size
required to support and supply its value-added meat businesses. In 2007, the Company completed many steps in the strategy including
closing two pork plants and double-shifting the front-end “kill” portion of the Brandon, Manitoba primary processing plant, selling the
animal nutrition business, opening a modern, scaleable plant for value-added, packaged meats and meals products, and restructuring
or disposing of elements of the Company’s Manitoba, Alberta and Ontario hog operations. Other actions will be pursued over the next
two years to complete the strategy. While the Company has invested considerable effort in developing the strategy and is carefully
planning the execution of the strategy, there can be no guarantee that the strategy is the correct one to maximize the profitability of its
meat businesses and recover the loss in competitiveness due to adverse currency movements, or that the Company will be successful
in implementing or executing the strategy or that its business will not be disrupted. If the strategy is unsuccessful or implemented or
executed incorrectly, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
2007 a nnua l report
33
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
standardized and shared systems and prOCesses
In 2006, in conjunction with the strategic review of its protein businesses, the Company began a process to standardize core operational
and financial processes and supporting systems across the Company as a foundation to establish a multi-functional shared service
organization expected to provide lower cost, value-added services for all the Company’s business operations. Poor design or execution
of the these changes, disruptions to and diversions of the Company’s management resources or poor implementation of the information
technology systems required to support the new structure could result in the project not achieving the objectives in the longer-term and
may also negatively impact the Company’s performance in the shorter-term. Any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect
on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
fOOd safety and COnsumer health
The Company is subject to risks that affect the food industry in general, including risks posed by food spoilage, accidental contamination,
product tampering, consumer product liability, and the potential costs and disruptions of a product recall. The Company actively manages
these risks by maintaining strict and rigorous controls and processes in its manufacturing facilities and distribution systems and by
maintaining prudent levels of insurance.
The Company’s facilities are subject to audit by federal health agencies in Canada and similar institutions outside of Canada, and performs
its own audits to ensure compliance with its internal standards, which are generally at, or higher than, regulatory agency standards.
However, the Company cannot guarantee that compliance with procedures and regulations will necessarily mitigate the risks related
to food safety.
livestOCk
The Company is susceptible to risks related to health status of livestock both within and outside its protein operations. Livestock health
problems could adversely affect production, supply of raw material to manufacturing facilities and consumer confidence. The Company
monitors herd health status and has strict biosecurity procedures and employee training programs throughout its hog production system.
However, not all livestock procured by the Company may be subject to these processes, as hog and poultry livestock is also purchased
from independent third parties, and the Company cannot be assured that an outbreak of animal disease in Canada will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Maple Leaf Foods has developed a comprehensive internal
contingency plan for dealing with animal disease occurrences or a more broad-based pandemic and has taken steps to encourage the
Canadian government to enhance both the country’s prevention measures and preparedness plans. There can be no assurance, however,
that these prevention measures or plans will be successful in minimizing or containing the impact of an outbreak of animal disease and
that such an outbreak, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
fOreign CurrenCies
A significant amount of the Company’s revenues and costs are either denominated in or directly linked to other currencies (primarily
U.S. dollars and Japanese yen). In periods when the Canadian dollar has appreciated both rapidly and materially against these foreign
currencies, revenues linked to U.S. dollars or Japanese yen are immediately reduced while the Company’s ability to change prices or
realize on natural hedges may lag the immediate currency change. The effect of such sudden changes in exchange rates can have a
significant immediate impact on the Company’s earnings. Due to the diversity of the Company’s operations, normal fluctuations in other
currencies do not generally have a material impact on the Company’s profitability in the short-term due to either “natural hedges” and
offsetting currency exposures (for example, when revenues and costs are both linked to other currencies) or the ability in the near-term
to change prices of its products to offset adverse currency movements. However, as the Company competes in international markets, and
faces competition in its domestic markets from U.S. competitors, significant changes in the Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rate can have,
and has had significant effects on the Company’s relative competitiveness in its domestic and international markets which can have, and
has had, significant effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s earnings related to the U.K. may
also be affected, adversely or favourably, by foreign currency translation in a similar manner.
34
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
COmmOdities
The Company is a purchaser of certain commodities, such as wheat, feed grains, livestock and natural gas, in the course of normal
operations. Commodity prices are subject to fluctuation and such fluctuations are sometimes severe. The Company may use commodity
futures and options for hedging purposes to reduce the effect of changing prices in the short-term but such hedges may not be successful
in mitigating this commodity price risk. On a longer-term basis, the Company manages the risk of increases in commodities and other input
costs by increasing the price it charges to its customers. Any fluctuations in commodity prices that the Company is unable to properly
hedge or mitigate could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
internatiOnal trade
The Company exports significant amounts of its products to customers outside Canada and certain of its inputs are affected by global
commodity prices. As a result, the Company can be affected, both positively and adversely, by international events that affect the price
of food commodities or the free flow of food products between countries. Examples of such events are animal disease in other countries,
trade actions and tariffs on food products, and government subsidies of competing agricultural products.
regulatiOn and legal matters
The Company’s operations are subject to extensive regulation by government agencies in the countries in which it operates, including
the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and the Ministry of Agriculture in Canada. These agencies regulate the processing, packaging,
storage, distribution, advertising and labelling of the Company’s products, including food safety standards. The Company’s manufacturing
facilities and products are subject to inspection by federal, provincial and local authorities. The Company strives to maintain material
compliance with all laws and regulations and maintains all material permits and licences relating to its operations. Nevertheless, there
can be no assurance that the Company is in compliance with such laws and regulations or that it will be able to comply with such laws
and regulations in the future. Failure by the Company to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject the Company to civil
remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company. Various governments throughout the world are considering regulatory proposals relating to genetically modified
organisms, drug residues or food ingredients, food safety and market and environmental regulation that, if adopted, may increase the
Company’s costs. If any of these or other proposals are enacted, the Company could experience a disruption in supply and may be unable
to pass on the cost increases to its customers without incurring volume loss as a result of higher prices.
In the normal course of its operations, the Company becomes involved in various legal actions. The Company believes that the resolution
of these claims will not have a material effect on the Company. However, the final outcome with respect to actions outstanding, pending
or with respect to future claims cannot be predicted with certainty. Therefore, there can be no assurance that their resolution will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
envirOnmental regulatiOn
The Company’s operations are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the
environment and the handling and disposition of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) or otherwise relating to protection of the
environment. Failure to comply could have serious consequences, such as criminal as well as civil penalties, liability for damages, and
negative publicity to the Company. The Company has incurred and will continue to incur capital and operating expenditures to comply
with such laws and regulations. No assurances can be given that additional environmental issues relating to presently known matters
or identified sites or to other matters or sites will not require additional expenditures, or that requirements applicable to the Company will
not be altered in ways that will require the Company to incur significant additional costs. In addition, certain of the Company’s facilities
have been in operation for many years and, over such time, the Company and other prior operators of such facilities may have generated
and disposed of wastes which are or may be considered hazardous. Future discovery of previously unknown contamination of property
underlying or in the vicinity of the Company’s present or former properties or manufacturing facilities and/or waste disposal sites could
require the Company to incur material unforeseen expenses. Occurrences of any such events may have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
2007 a nnua l report
35
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
COnsOlidating CustOmer envirOnment
As the retail grocery and foodservice trades continue to consolidate and customers grow larger, the Company is required to adjust to
changes in purchasing practices and changing customer requirements, as failure to do so could result in losing sales volumes and market
share. The Company’s net sales and profitability could also be affected by deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse
developments in the relationship with, one or more of its major customers.
leverage
The terms of the Company’s credit facilities and the terms of any debt securities, if issued, include covenants which could limit the
Company’s operating and financial flexibility. The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest, or refinancing
of its indebtedness depends on its future business performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors
beyond its control. Any failure by the Company to satisfy its obligations with respect to its indebtedness at maturity or prior thereto would
constitute a default under such indebtedness and could cause a default under the agreements governing other indebtedness, if any, of the
Company. Such events could cause a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
animal disease and human health
The Company is subject to risks that affect agriculture and animal health, including disease affecting its employees, such as a pandemic.
These risks could result in disruptions of trade, consumer confidence issues, and impact its ability to manufacture and ship products
as well as perform core business processes. The Company actively manages these risks by maintaining a general emergency response
process. This process involves prevention, preparedness including emergency simulations, response and recovery plans. In 2005, the
Company initiated a project to update its emergency response plans to more thoroughly address the potential for a global pandemic
and its human health implications. These plans will be updated as necessary to maintain relevance and priority, and be supported by
simulations of various emergencies for continuous improvement. The Company monitors the World Health Organization and other alert
systems worldwide, to enable prompt reaction to any specific issues. However, not all services procured by the Company may be subject
to these processes, as it depends on independent third parties for many aspects of the business, such as transportation. The Company
cannot guarantee that a potential human disease pandemic will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition
and results of operations.
COnsumer trends
Success of the Company depends in part on the Company’s ability to respond to market trends and produce innovative products that
anticipate and respond to the changing tastes and dietary habits of consumers. From time to time, certain products are deemed more
healthy or less healthy and this can impact consumer buying patterns. For instance, there was a “low carb” trend a number of years
ago that, in the short-term, diverted customers away from the Company’s pasta products but increased demand for proteins generally.
The Company’s failure to anticipate, identify or react to these changes or to innovate our products could result in declining demand for the
Company’s products, which in turn could cause a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
emplOyment matters
The Company and its subsidiaries have approximately 23,000 full and part-time employees, which include salaried and union employees,
many of whom are covered by collective agreements. These employees are located in various jurisdictions around the world, each
of which with differing employment laws and practices and differing liabilities for employment violations, which may result in punitive
or extraordinary damages. While the Company maintains systems and procedures to comply with the applicable requirements, there
is a risk that failures or lapses by individual managers could result in a violation or cause of action that could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if a collective agreement covering a significant number
of employees or involving certain key employees were to expire leading to a work stoppage, there can be no assurance that such work
stoppage would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
36
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
critical accountinG estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions.
The estimates and assumptions are based on the Company’s experience combined with Management’s understanding of facts and
circumstances at the time. These estimates may differ from actual results, and certain estimates are considered critical as they are both
important to reflect the Company’s financial position and results of operations and require a significant or complex judgement on the
part of Management. The following is a summary of certain accounting estimates or policies considered critical by the Management
of the Company.
gOOdwill and intangible valuatiOn
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the second quarter and otherwise as required if events occur that indicate that it is more
likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit has been impaired. In performing this test, the Company assesses the fair value
of its various reporting units and the fair value of goodwill, if required. Indefinite life intangibles are tested for impairment annually
in the fourth quarter and otherwise as required if events occur that indicate that it is more likely than not that the carrying value has
been impaired.
The sale of the Company’s animal nutrition business on July 20, 2007 triggered a goodwill impairment charge of $20.7 million related to
the retained operations of the animal nutrition business. The impairment test for intangibles was performed in 2007 and no impairment
was identified.
asset impairment
During 2007, the Company entered into transactions to sell most of its Ontario hog production operations and all wholly-owned investments
in Alberta. Proceeds realized on the sales of these businesses in 2008 resulted in an impairment charge of $27.0 million being recorded
in the fourth quarter of 2007 which was included in restructuring and other related costs.
These proceeds received for its hog production assets in Alberta and Ontario have caused Management to reassess the carrying value
of its remaining hog production operations in Manitoba. The Company has concluded that the long-lived assets related to the Manitoba
hog operations have been impaired and consequently, the Company has recorded an impairment charge of $36.1 million in the fourth
quarter of 2007. Estimates of fair value of these long-lived assets were used to determine the impairment charge.
reserve fOr bad debts
The Company establishes an appropriate provision for non-collectible or doubtful accounts. Estimates of recoverable amounts are based
on Management’s best estimate of a customer’s ability to settle its obligations, and actual amounts received may be affected by various
factors, including industry conditions and changes in individual customer financial condition.
prOvisiOns fOr inventOry
Management makes estimates as to the future customer demand for our products when establishing the appropriate provisions for
inventory. In making these estimates, Management considers product life, the profitability of recent sales of inventory, and changes
in customer mix.
trade merChandise allOwanCes and Other trade disCOunts
The Company provides for estimated payments to customers based on various trade programs and contracts, which includes payments
upon attainment of specified sales volumes. Significant estimates used to determine these liabilities include the level of customer
performance and the historical promotional expenditure rate compared to contracted rates.
emplOyee benefit plans
The cost of pensions and other retirement benefits earned by employees is actuarially determined using the projected benefit method
prorated on service and Management’s best estimate of expected plan investment performance of 7.5%, salary escalation (3.5%),
retirement ages of employees and expected heath care costs. Discount rates used in actuarial calculations are based on long-term
interest rates and can have a material effect on the amount of plan liabilities.
2007 a nnua l report
37
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The effect on the following items of a 1% increase and decrease in health care costs, assuming no change in benefit levels, is as follows:
End-of-year obligation ($ million change)
Aggregate of 2007 current service cost and interest cost ($ million change)
taxes
1% increase
1% decrease
3.4
0.2
(3.8)
(0.3)
Provisions for income taxes are based on domestic and international statutory income tax rates and tax planning opportunities available
to the Company in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Significant judgement is required in determining income tax provisions and
in evaluating tax positions. The Company establishes additional provisions for income taxes when, despite the belief that existing tax
positions are fully supportable, there remain certain tax positions that may be reviewed and reassessed by tax authorities. The Company
adjusts these additional accruals in light of changing facts and circumstances.
restruCturing and Other related COsts reserves
The Company evaluates accruals related to restructuring and other related costs at each reporting date to ensure these accruals are
still appropriate. In certain instances, Management may determine that these accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies
in carrying out restructuring and other related activities. In certain circumstances, Management may determine that certain accruals
are insufficient as new events occur or as additional information is obtained.
chanGes in accountinG policies
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted new Canadian accounting standards for financial instruments. The adoption of these
new standards requires the Company to present a new balance sheet account entitled Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).
This account includes (i) unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments, and (ii) unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
net of tax. On transition, the Company recorded $32.2 million in accumulated unrealized losses related to cash flow hedges as at
January 1, 2007. In accordance with the standard $9.8 million, which had previously been classified as unrealized foreign currency
adjustment, is now presented within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
During 2007, the Company recorded Other Comprehensive Income of $6.6 million, primarily related to fair value changes in cash flow
hedges of interest rate exposures offset by changes in unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments. As at the end of the year,
the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss balance was a loss of $35.4 million.
recent accountinG pronouncements
gOOdwill and intangible assets
In 2008, the CICA issued Handbook Section 3064 (“CICA 3064”), “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”. CICA 3064 replaces Section 3062,
“Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, and Section 3450, “Research and Development Costs”. It establishes standards for the recognition,
measurement and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. This new standard is effective for the Company’s interim and annual
consolidated financial statements commencing January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard.
inventOries
In May 2007, the Accounting Standards Board issued Handbook Section 3031, “Inventories”. The standard introduces changes to the
measurement and disclosure of inventory and converges with international accounting standards. The standard is effective for interim
and annual periods relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this
standard will have a material impact on the financial statements.
Capital disClOsures
In October 2006, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board issued Section 1535, “Capital Disclosures” which requires entities to disclose
qualitative information about their objectives, policies and process for managing capital. This standard is effective for fiscal periods
beginning on or after October 1, 2007. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on the
financial statements.
38
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
finanCial instruments
In December 2006, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board issued Section 3862, “Financial Instruments Disclosures” and Section 3863,
“Financial Instruments – Presentation”, which replaces Section 3861, “Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation”. The new
disclosure standards increase the emphasis on the risks associated with both recognized and unrecognized financial instruments and
how those risks are managed. The new presentation standards carry forward the former presentation requirements and are effective
for the fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new disclosure standard.
disclosure controls and internal controls over Financial reportinG
The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to
the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to Management in a timely manner so that information required to be
disclosed by the Company under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in applicable securities legislation. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2007, and have concluded that such disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
The Company’s Management, under the direction and supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are also
responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting. These controls are designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with Canadian GAAP. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
summary oF quarterly results
Following is a summary of unaudited quarterly financial information (in thousands of dollars except per share information):
Sales
Net earnings from continuing operations
Net earnings
Earnings per share:
Basic from continuing operations (i)
Adjusted EPS from continuing operations (i) (ii)
Total
Diluted from continuing operations
Diluted
(i)
(ii)
Does not add due to rounding.
Refer to non-GAAP measures on Page 20.
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Total
$ 1,316,135
1,286,297
$ 1,318,773
1,356,465
$ 1,301,099
1,320,633
$ 1,273,633
1,361,361
$ 5,209,640
5,324,756
5,266
11,327
10,463
17,272
(6,458)
14,735
(1,671)
21,186
1,698
(28,174)
220,424
(22,309)
(23,738)
(17,879)
(22,072)
(11,624)
(23,232)
(19,991)
207,144
4,525
$
$
0.04
0.09
0.12
0.09
0.08
0.14
0.04
0.09
0.08
0.13
(0.05) $
0.12
0.13
0.12
(0.01)
0.17
(0.05)
0.11
(0.01)
0.16
$
0.01
(0.22)
0.06
0.05
1.72
(0.17)
0.01
(0.22)
1.67
(0.17)
(0.19) $
(0.14)
0.20
0.13
(0.16)
(0.09)
(0.18)
(0.14)
(0.15)
(0.09)
(0.18)
(0.16)
0.51
0.38
1.63
0.04
(0.18)
(0.16)
1.59
0.03
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
2007
2006
For an explanation and analysis of quarterly results, refer to Management’s Discussion & Analysis for each of the respective quarterly
periods filed on SEDAR and also available on the Company’s website at www.mapleleaf.ca.
2007 a nnua l report
39
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Forward-lookinG statements
This document contains, and the Company’s oral and written public communications often contain, forward-looking statements that are
based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries in which the Company operates, and beliefs
and assumptions made by the Management of the Company. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to
our objectives and goals, as well as statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates and
intentions. Words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “attempt”, “may”, “will”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate”, and variations
of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The Company does not
intend, and the Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, or whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law.
These forward-looking statements are based on a variety of factors and assumptions including, but not limited to: the condition of the
Canadian and United States economies; the rate of appreciation of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar and Japanese yen; the
availability and saleability of livestock, raw materials, energy and supplies; product pricing; the competitive environment and related
market conditions; improvement of operating efficiencies; continued access to capital; the cost of compliance with environmental and
health standards; adverse results from ongoing litigation; no expected actions of domestic and foreign governments and the general
assumption that none of the risks identified under “Risk Factors” will materialize. These assumptions have been derived from information
currently available to the Company including information obtained by the Company from third-party industry analysts.
Actual results may differ materially from those predicted by such forward-looking statements. While the Company does not know what
impact any of these differences may have on its business, results of operations, financial condition and the market price of its securities
may be materially adversely affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from the results expressed
or implied by forward-looking statements include, among other things:
• the risks posed by food contamination, consumer liability and product recalls;
• the risks related to the health status of livestock;
• the risks related to the creditworthiness of customers to whom the Company extends credit;
• the Company’s exposure to currency exchange risks;
• the ability of the Company to hedge against the effect of commodity price changes through the use of commodity futures and options;
• the impact of international events on commodity prices and the free flow of goods;
• the cyclical nature of the cost and supply of hogs and the competitive nature of the pork market generally;
• the risks associated with implementing and executing the protein business transformation;
• the risks associated with changes in the Company’s shared systems and processes;
• the risks posed by compliance with extensive government regulation;
• the impact of extensive environmental regulation and potential environmental liabilities;
• the risks associated with a consolidating retail environment;
• the risks associated with the Company’s outstanding indebtedness;
• the impact of a pandemic on the Company’s operations; and
•
the risks associated with complying with differing employment laws and practices globally and the potential for work stoppages due
to non-renewal of collective agreements.
The Company cautions you that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. These factors are discussed in more detail under the
heading “Risk Factors” on page 33 of this document. The reader should review such section in detail.
Additional information concerning the Company, including the Company’s Annual Information Form, is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com.
40
m a ple lea F Foods
Management’s Statement of Responsibility
Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in the best interests of all its shareholders. The Consolidated
Financial Statements and related information in the annual report are the responsibility of management. The Consolidated Financial
Statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, which involve the use of
judgement and estimates in applying the accounting principles selected. Other financial information in the annual report is consistent with
that in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company maintains systems of internal controls, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that accounting records are
reliable, and to safeguard the Company’s assets. The Company’s independent auditors, KPMG llp, Chartered Accountants, have audited
and reported on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Their opinion is based upon audits conducted by them in accordance
with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards to obtain reasonable assurance that the Consolidated Financial Statements are free
of material misstatement.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, all of whom are independent of the Company or any of its affiliates, meets periodically with
the independent external auditors, the internal auditors and management representatives to review the internal accounting controls, the
consolidated quarterly and annual financial statements and other financial reporting matters. Both the internal and independent external
auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reports its findings and makes recommendations to the
Board of Directors.
February 20, 2008
M. H. McCain
President and
Chief Executive Officer
M. H. Vels
Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer
Auditors’ Report to the Shareholders
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Maple Leaf Foods Inc. as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings, comprehensive income and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan
and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles.
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 20, 2008
2007 a nnua l report
41
2007
2006
(Note 2(r))
$
28,222
202,285
351,064
25,409
16,529
10,092
633,601
1,207
1,126,727
303,360
22,837
817,477
92,635
$
64,494
201,743
376,216
2,128
11,158
311,172
966,911
15,499
1,080,293
279,001
23,464
829,641
80,917
$ 2,997,844
$ 3,275,726
$
9,845
550,528
12,881
17,945
—
591,199
855,281
61,935
248,448
79,554
1,161,427
$
9,130
594,685
18,056
81,954
74,474
778,299
1,185,970
29,867
196,911
90,237
994,442
$ 2,997,844
$ 3,275,726
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at December 31,
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable (Note 5)
Inventories (Note 6)
Future tax asset – current (Note 21)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Assets held for sale (Note 4)
Investments in associated companies
Property and equipment (Note 7)
Other long-term assets (Note 8)
Future tax asset – non-current (Note 21)
Goodwill
Other intangibles (Note 9)
liabilities and sharehOlders’ eQuity
Current liabilities
Bank indebtedness
Accounts payable and accrued charges
Income and other taxes payable
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)
Liabilities related to assets held for sale (Note 4)
Long-term debt (Note 10)
Future tax liability – non-current (Note 21)
Other long-term liabilities (Note 11)
Minority interest
Shareholders’ equity (Note 14)
Contingencies and commitments (Note 25)
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On behalf of the Board:
Michael H. McCain
Director
Diane McGarry
Director
42
m a ple lea F Foods
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands of Canadian dollars, except share amounts)
Sales
Earnings from continuing operations before restructuring and other related costs
Restructuring and other related costs (Note 13)
Earnings from continuing operations
Other income (Note 19)
Earnings from continuing operations before interest and income taxes
Interest expense (Note 20)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
Income taxes (Note 21)
Loss from continuing operations before minority interest
Minority interest
Net loss from continuing operations
Net earnings from discontinued operations – net of income tax (Note 3)
Net earnings
Basic earnings (loss) per share (Note 17) (i)
From continuing operations
From discontinued operations
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (Note 17)
From continuing operations
From discontinued operations
Weighted average number of shares (millions)
(i)
2006 Basic earnings (loss) per share does not add due to rounding.
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007
2006
(Note 2(r))
$ 5,209,640
$ 5,324,756
$
199,056
(122,304)
$
172,802
(63,230)
76,752
4,578
81,330
94,122
(12,792)
801
(13,593)
9,639
(23,232)
230,376
$
207,144
$
$
$
$
(0.18)
1.81
1.63
(0.18)
1.77
1.59
127.3
109,572
2,647
112,219
90,204
22,015
35,799
(13,784)
6,208
(19,992)
24,517
4,525
(0.16)
0.19
0.04
(0.16)
0.19
0.03
127.5
$
$
$
$
$
2007 a nnua l report
43
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
Retained earnings, beginning of year
Net earnings for the year
Dividends declared $0.16 per share (2006: $0.16 per share)
Premium on repurchase of share capital (Note 14)
Retained earnings, end of year
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007
2006
$
204,415
207,144
(20,775)
—
$
231,807
4,525
(20,387)
(11,530)
$
390,784
$
204,415
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
Net earnings for the year
Other comprehensive income (Note 15)
Change in accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment
Change in net unrealized derivative loss on cash flow hedges
Comprehensive income
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007
2006
$
207,144
$
4,525
(16,036)
22,620
6,584
8,749
—
8,749
$
213,728
$
13,274
44
m a ple lea F Foods
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31,
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
Cash prOvided by (used in)
Operating activities
Net loss from continuing operations
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation (Note 16)
Minority interest
Future income taxes
Gain on sale of property and equipment
Loss (gain) on sale of investments
Change in other long-term receivables
Increase in net pension asset
Asset impairments and changes in restructuring and other related costs (Note 13)
Other
Change in non-cash operating working capital
Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations
Financing activities
Dividends paid
Dividends paid to minority interest
Increase in long-term debt
Decrease in long-term debt
Increase in share capital (Note 14)
Shares repurchased for cancellation (Note 14)
Purchase of treasury stock (Note 14)
Other
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations
Investing activities
Additions to property and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
Acquisition of businesses – net of cash acquired (Note 24)
Proceeds on sale of investments
Proceeds on disposal of business (Note 24)
Purchase of Canada Bread shares (Note 23)
Other
Cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
Supplemental cash flow information:
Net interest paid
Net income taxes paid
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007
2006
(Note 2(r))
$
(23,232)
$
(19,992)
141,181
15,340
9,639
(46,290)
(2,341)
(176)
(1,957)
(48,034)
101,348
7,999
(30,643)
122,834
(17,086)
105,748
(20,775)
(801)
5,389
(340,863)
20,944
—
(30,054)
8,200
(357,960)
(389)
(358,349)
(236,660)
9,788
(65,013)
3,713
5,470
(6,521)
1,521
(287,702)
503,316
215,614
(36,987)
55,364
18,377
102,455
62,574
$
$
130,736
10,384
6,208
75
(2,051)
202
4,546
(55,322)
20,621
7,185
4,827
107,419
24,592
132,011
(20,387)
(1,602)
237,778
(128,098)
15,556
(23,056)
—
2,357
82,548
403
82,951
(155,935)
7,605
(80,986)
—
—
—
1,956
(227,360)
(12,740)
(240,100)
(25,138)
80,502
55,364
96,222
67,072
$
$
2007 a nnua l report
45
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (Tabular amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
1. the company
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (“Maple Leaf Foods” or the “Company”) is a leading Canadian-based value-added meat, meals and bakery
company, serving wholesale, retail and foodservice customers across North America and internationally. The Company’s results are
organized into three segments: Meat Products Group, Agribusiness Group and Bakery Products Group.
2. siGniFicant accountinG policies
The following are the significant accounting policies of the Company.
(a) prinCiples Of COnsOlidatiOn
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries and the Company’s proportionate share
of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses of joint ventures over which the Company exercises joint control. Investments in associated
companies over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for by the equity method. Variable Interest Entities
(“VIEs”), as defined by Accounting Guideline 15 – “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” are consolidated by the Company when it is
determined that the Company will, as the primary beneficiary, absorb the majority of the VIEs’ expected losses and/or expected residual
returns. Investments in equity securities of entities over which the Company does not exert significant influence are accounted for using
the cost method or at fair value depending on whether such investments are publicly traded.
(b) use Of estimates
The preparation of periodic financial statements necessarily involves the use of estimates. Estimates are used when accounting for items
and matters such as allowances for uncollectible accounts, sales of receivables, inventory obsolescence, depreciation and amortization,
asset valuations, impairment assessments, employee benefits, pensions, taxes and any corresponding valuation allowances, restructuring
and other related costs, stock-based compensation and contingencies. Should the underlying assumptions change, the actual amounts
could differ from those estimates.
(C) translatiOn Of fOreign CurrenCies
The accounts of the Company are presented in Canadian dollars. The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries whose unit of measure
is not the Canadian dollar are translated into Canadian dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the year end for assets and liabilities
and the average exchange rates for the period for revenue, expenses and cash flows. Exchange gains or losses on translation of foreign
subsidiaries are deferred and included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, a component of shareholders’ equity until realized.
(d) revenue reCOgnitiOn
The Company recognizes revenues from product sales upon transfer of title to customers. Revenue is recorded at the invoice price for
each product net of estimated returns. An estimate of sales incentives provided to customers is also recognized at the time of sale and
is classified as a reduction in reported sales. Sales incentives include various rebate and promotional programs with the Company’s
customers. The rebates are primarily based on achievement of specified volume or growth in volume levels.
(e) finanCial instruments
The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as held for trading, available-for-sale financial assets, held-to-
maturity investments, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial
instruments were acquired and their characteristics. Held for trading is the required classification for all derivative instruments unless
they are specifically designated within an effective hedge relationship. Held for trading financial instruments are measured at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings in the period in which they arise. Loans and receivables and other financial liabilities
are measured at amortized cost.
(f) hedge aCCOunting
The Company uses derivatives and other non-derivative financial instruments to manage its exposures to fluctuations in interest rates,
foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.
46
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
At the inception of a hedging relationship, the Company designates and formally documents the relationship between the hedging
instrument and the hedged item, its risk management objective and its strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation identifies
the specific asset, liability or anticipated cash flows being hedged, the risk that is being hedged, the type of hedging instrument used
and how effectiveness will be assessed.
The Company also formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether or not the derivatives that are used in
hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes attributable to the hedged risks in the fair values or cash flows of the
hedged items. If a hedge relationship becomes ineffective, it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting and any subsequent change in the
fair value of the hedging instrument is recognized in earnings.
When hedge accounting is appropriate, the hedging relationship is designated as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge or a hedge
of foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a self-sustaining foreign operation.
Effective January 1, 2007, in a cash flow hedge, the change in fair value of the hedging instrument is recorded in other comprehensive
income, to the extent it is effective, until the hedged item affects the consolidated statement of earnings. The Company uses cash flow
hedges primarily to convert fixed-rate U.S. dollar-denominated notes payable to fixed-rate notes denominated in Canadian dollars.
The Company also uses cash flow hedges to mitigate the risk from variable cash flows associated with forecasted foreign currency-
denominated cash flows and forecasted purchases and sales of various agricultural commodities.
Effective January 1, 2007, in a fair value hedge, the change in fair value of the hedging derivative is offset in the consolidated statement
of earnings by the change in fair value of the hedged item relating to the hedged risk.
Effective January 1, 2007, in a net investment hedge, the change in fair value of the hedging instrument, to the extent effective, is recorded
directly in other comprehensive income. These amounts are recognized in income when the corresponding cumulative translation
adjustments from self-sustaining foreign operations are recognized in income. The Company designates certain U.S. dollar-denominated
notes payable as net investment hedges of U.S. operations.
Commencing January 1, 2007, hedge ineffectiveness is measured and recorded in current period earnings in the consolidated statement
of earnings. When either a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge is discontinued, any cumulative adjustment to either the hedged item or
other comprehensive income is recognized in earnings as the hedged item affects earnings, or when the hedged item is derecognized.
If a designated hedge is no longer effective, the associated derivative instrument is subsequently carried at fair value through earnings
without any offset from the hedged item.
For all periods presented, changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are carried at fair value in the
consolidated balance sheet, and subsequent changes in their fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of earnings.
Prior to January 1, 2007, derivatives that met hedge accounting criteria were accounted for on an accrual basis. Income and expenses
on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as hedges were recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings in the same
period as the related hedged item. When a hedging relationship was discontinued, the associated derivative instrument was subsequently
carried at fair value and any previously deferred income or expenses were carried forward for recognition in the consolidated statement
of earnings in the same period as the related hedged item, generally by amortization over the remaining term of the hedged asset or
liability. Hedge ineffectiveness was generally recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings over the life of the hedging relationship.
(g) inventOries
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, with cost being determined substantially on a first-in, first-out basis.
Included in the cost of inventory are direct product costs, direct labour and an allocation of variable and fixed manufacturing overhead
including depreciation.
2007 a nnua l report
47
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(h) impairment Or dispOsal Of lOng-lived assets
Maple Leaf Foods reviews long-lived assets or asset groups held and used including property and equipment and intangible assets
subject to amortization for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of
the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the asset or asset group. An impairment loss is
recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group. Long-lived assets are
classified as held for sale when certain criteria are met and the sale is expected to be completed within one year. These assets to be
disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet, reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell,
and are no longer depreciated.
(i) prOperty and eQuipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost including, where applicable, interest capitalized during the construction or development
period. Construction in process assets are capitalized during construction and depreciation commences when the asset is available
for use. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line basis at the following rates, which are based on the expected useful lives
of the assets:
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
(j) finanCing COsts
2.5% to 6%
10% to 33%
Costs incurred to obtain long-term debt financing are amortized over the term of such debt based on the effective interest method and the
amount amortized is included in interest expense for the year.
(k) gOOdwill and Other intangibles
Goodwill is the residual amount that results when the purchase price of an acquired business exceeds the sum of the amounts allocated
to identifiable assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, based on their fair values. Goodwill is allocated as of the date of the business
combination to the Company’s reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. The Company
assigns value to certain acquired identifiable intangible assets, primarily brands, customer relationships, poultry quota and delivery routes.
Definite life intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment annually
in the second quarter and otherwise as required if events occur that indicate that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a
reporting unit has been impaired. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying
amount to its fair value. During the year, the Company recorded an impairment in goodwill (Note 18). Indefinite life intangibles, including
poultry quota and certain brands, are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and, as required, if events occur that indicate it
is more likely than not the carrying value has been impaired. The impairment test for indefinite life intangible assets was performed in 2007
and no impairment was identified.
(l) inCOme taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Accordingly, future tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
In addition, the effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the year that includes the
enactment or substantive enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized against future tax assets when it is more likely than not
that all or some part of the asset will not be realized.
48
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(m) emplOyee benefit plans
The Company accrues obligations and costs in respect of employee benefit plans. The cost of pensions and other retirement benefits
earned by employees is actuarially determined using the projected benefit method prorated on service and Management’s best estimate
of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation, retirement ages of employees and expected health care costs. Changes
in these assumptions could affect future pension expense. For the purpose of calculating the expected return on plan assets, those
assets are valued at fair value. Past service costs arising from plan amendments are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average
remaining service period of employees active at the date of amendment.
Actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the actuarial liabilities and the market value of assets at the beginning of the
year and all gains and losses due to changes in plan provisions are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected average remaining
service period of the active plan members. When a restructuring of a benefit plan gives rise to both a curtailment and settlement of
obligations, the curtailment is accounted for prior to the settlement.
(n) stOCk-based COmpensatiOn
The Company applies the fair value method of accounting for its stock-based compensation. The fair value at grant date of stock options
(“options”) is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are measured
based on the fair value of the underlying shares on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
expected vesting period of the stock-based compensation. The Company estimates forfeitures at the grant date and revises the estimate
as necessary if subsequent information indicates that actual forfeitures differ significantly from the original estimate.
(O) statement Of Cash flOws
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash and short-term securities with maturities less than 90 days at the date of acquisition,
less bank indebtedness.
(p) aCCOunting Changes
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted three new financial instrument accounting standards that were issued by the CICA:
Handbook Section 1530, “Comprehensive Income”, Handbook Section 3855, “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”,
and Handbook Section 3865, “Hedges”. Comparative amounts for prior periods have not been restated except for the currency translation
account, which was reclassified to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
The following table summarizes the adjustments required to adopt the new standards on January 1, 2007:
Increase in other current assets
Decrease in other assets
Increase in future tax asset – long-term
Increase in other current liabilities
Decrease in long-term debt
Increase in other long-term liabilities
Increase in unrealized foreign currency adjustment
Accumulated other comprehensive loss – cash flow hedges
Accumulated other comprehensive loss – cumulative translation account
$
1,167
(12,889)
16,587
(3,085)
3,123
(37,101)
9,809
32,198
(9,809)
The overall impact to net earnings from the adoption of the new standards for the year was not significant.
(Q) reCent aCCOunting prOnOunCements
In 2008, the CICA issued Handbook Section 3064 (“CICA 3064”), “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”. CICA 3064, which replaces Section
3062, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, and Section 3450, “Research and Development Costs”, establishes standards for the recognition,
measurement and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. This new standard is effective for the Company’s interim and annual
consolidated financial statements commencing January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard.
2007 a nnua l report
49
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In May 2007, the Accounting Standards Board issued CICA Handbook Section 3031, “Inventories”. The standard introduces changes to
the measurement and disclosure of inventory and converges with international accounting standards. The standard is effective for interim
and annual periods relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this
standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In December 2006, the Accounting Standards Board issued CICA Handbook Section 3862, “Financial Instruments – Disclosure” and
Section 3863, “Financial Instruments – Presentation” which replaces Section 3861, “Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation”.
The new disclosure standards increase the emphasis on the risks associated with both recognized and unrecognized financial instruments
and how those risks are managed. The new presentation standards carry forward the former presentation requirements and are effective
for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new disclosure standard.
In October 2006, the Accounting Standards Board issued CICA Handbook Section 1535, “Capital Disclosures”, which establishes standards
for disclosing information about an entity’s capital and how it is managed. The standard is effective for interim and annual financial
statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard
will have a material impact on its financial statements.
(r) COmparative figures
Certain 2006 comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the financial statement presentation adopted in 2007.
3. discontinued operations
On July 20, 2007, the Company sold its animal nutrition business, retaining two mills in Western Canada to meet future requirements of its
hog production operations, for gross proceeds of $524.8 million. As a result, the Company has reclassified the portion of its animal nutrition
business that has been sold as discontinued operations.
The assets and liabilities of the animal nutrition business reflected in balance sheets prior to the sale date have been classified as held for
sale (Note 4). The results of discontinued operations were as follows:
$
$
2007
342,642
25,651
(2,672)
22,979
162
23,141
5,147
17,994
7,000
10,994
219,382
$
$
2006
570,460
51,096
(1,388)
49,708
379
50,087
8,900
41,187
16,670
24,517
—
24,517
$
230,376
$
Sales
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Restructuring and other related costs
Earnings from operations
Other income
Earnings from operations before interest and income taxes
Interest expense (i)
Earnings before income taxes
Income taxes
Net earnings from discontinued operations before gain on sale
Gain on sale of business (net of income taxes of $65.1 million)
Net earnings from discontinued operations
(i)
In calculating net earnings from discontinued operations, interest expense has been allocated assuming a uniform debt-to-equity ratio.
50
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
4. assets and liaBilities held F or sale
Assets and liabilities held for sale consist of the assets of the animal nutrition business sold on July 20, 2007 (Note 3), and the assets
of certain hog production operations in Ontario and Alberta sold in January 2008 (Note 26). Assets and liabilities held for sale consist
of the following:
Animal
Nutrition
2007
Hog
Production
$
$
—
4,074
—
—
—
6,018
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Assets held for sale
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Future tax asset – current
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Investments in associated companies
Property and equipment
Other long-term assets
Goodwill
Other intangibles
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
Accounts payable and accrued charges
Income and other taxes payable
Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities
$
$
$
—
—
—
$
$
2006
Animal
Nutrition
Hog
Production
$
62,063
39,604
193
828
6,611
88,398
3,090
77,922
1,730
$
—
12,026
—
—
—
18,707
—
—
—
Total
2006
62,063
51,630
193
828
6,611
107,105
3,090
77,922
1,730
Total
2007
—
4,074
—
—
—
6,018
—
—
—
$
10,092
$
10,092
$
280,439
$
30,733
$
311,172
$
—
—
—
—
$
—
—
—
—
$
$
71,201
2,009
974
290
—
$
—
$
—
$
74,474
$
—
—
—
—
—
$
$
71,201
2,009
974
290
74,474
5. accounts receivaBle
Under revolving securitization programs, the Company has sold certain of its trade accounts receivable to financial institutions. The
Company retains servicing responsibilities and retains a limited recourse obligation for delinquent receivables. At December 31, 2007,
trade accounts receivable being serviced under this program amounted to $218.5 million (2006: $241.5 million).
6. inventories
Material held for production
Finished products
7. property and equipment
Land
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress
Less: Accumulated depreciation
$
2007
198,547
152,517
$
2006
194,517
181,699
$
351,064
$
376,216
$
2007
59,752
625,351
1,472,548
165,434
2,323,085
1,196,358
$
2006
63,905
559,070
1,411,464
122,429
2,156,868
1,076,575
$ 1,126,727
$ 1,080,293
2007 a nnua l report
51
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
8. other lonG-term assets
Pension assets (Note 22)
Financing costs
Notes and mortgages receivable
Other
9. other intanGiBles
Brands
Poultry production quota
Customer relationships
Other
10. lonG-term deBt
Notes payable:
– due 2007 (US$60.0 million) (a)
– due 2009 (US$140.0 million) (a)
– due 2010 (US$75.0 million and CAD$115.0 million) (b)
– due 2011 (US$207.0 million) (c)
– due 2014 (US$98.0 million and CAD$105.0 million) (c)
– due 2016 (US$7.0 million and CAD$20.0 million) (c)
– due 2010 (CAD$6.5 million) (d)
– due 2016 (CAD$47.4 million) (d)
Revolving term facility (e)
Other (f)
Less: Current portion
$
2007
292,798
4,945
1,056
4,561
$
2006
251,959
20,663
1,367
5,012
$
303,360
$
279,001
$
$
$
2007
53,645
28,396
8,424
2,170
92,635
2007
—
138,378
189,348
205,199
202,148
26,939
7,195
53,258
25,000
25,761
873,226
17,945
$
$
$
2006
53,869
24,442
—
2,606
80,917
2006
69,918
163,142
202,398
241,217
219,199
28,157
9,458
58,028
237,778
38,629
1,267,924
81,954
$
855,281
$ 1,185,970
In December 2002, the Company issued US$60.0 million of notes payable, bearing interest at 5.6% per annum and due in 2007. Through
(a)
the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps entered into in prior years (Note 12), the Company effectively converted US$60.0 million into
Canadian dollar-denominated debt of $93.2 million bearing interest at floating interest rates being the three-month bankers’ acceptance
rate plus 2.5% per annum. In December 2007, the Company repaid the note payable and the cross-currency interest rate swap in full. The
financial impact of currency rate changes on the swap was reported as other long-term liabilities prior to January 1, 2007 and effective
January 1, 2007, the swap is now recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the swap was $nil (2006: carrying value of
swap liability, $23.3 million).
In December 2002, the Company issued US$140.0 million of notes payable, bearing interest at 6.3% per annum and due in 2009. Through
the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps entered into in prior years (Note 12), the Company effectively converted US$15.0 million into
Canadian dollar-denominated debt of $23.3 million bearing interest at floating interest rates being the three-month bankers’ acceptance
rate plus 2.6% per annum. In 2006, the Company entered into cross-currency swaps, which effectively converted the interest on the
remaining US$125.0 million notes payable from U.S. dollar-denominated interest at 6.3% per annum into Canadian dollar-denominated
interest at 6.2% per annum. The financial impact of currency rate changes on the swap was reported as other long-term liabilities prior
to January 1, 2007 and effective January 1, 2007, the swap is now recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the swap
(a liability) was $11.1 million (2006: carrying value of swap liability, $5.8 million).
52
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In April 2000, the Company issued notes payable due April 2010. The notes payable include a Canadian dollar-denominated tranche
(b)
for CAD$115.0 million, bearing interest at 7.7% per annum, and a U.S. dollar-denominated tranche for US$75.0 million, bearing interest
at 8.5% per annum. Through the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps (Note 12), the Company effectively converted the U.S. dollar
tranche into Canadian dollar-denominated debt, resulting in a Canadian dollar-denominated amount of $110.8 million at an effective fixed
interest rate of 7.7% per annum. The financial impact of currency rate changes on the swap was reported as other long-term liabilities
prior to January 1, 2007 and effective January 1, 2007, the swap is now recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the
swap liability was $37.0 million (2006: carrying value of swap liability, $23.4 million).
(c)
In December 2004, the Company issued $500.0 million of notes payable. The notes were issued in tranches of U.S. and Canadian
dollar denominations, with maturity dates from seven to 12 years and bearing interest at fixed annual coupon rates. Details of the five
tranches are:
Principal
US$207.0 million
US$98.0 million
US$7.0 million
CAD$105.0 million
CAD$20.0 million
Maturity Date
Annual Coupon
2011
2014
2016
2014
2016
5.2%
5.6%
5.8%
6.1%
6.2%
Interest is payable semi-annually. Through the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps (Note 12), the Company effectively converted;
US$177.0 million of debt maturing in 2011 into Canadian dollar-denominated debt of $231.0 million bearing interest at an annual fixed rate
of 5.4%, US$98.0 million of debt maturing in 2014 into Canadian dollar-denominated debt of $135.3 million bearing interest at an annual
fixed rate of 6.0%, and US$2.0 million of debt maturing in 2016 into Canadian dollar-denominated debt of $2.7 million bearing interest at an
annual fixed rate of 6.1%. The financial impact of currency rate changes on the swaps was reported as other long-term liabilities prior to
January 1, 2007 and effective January 1, 2007, the swaps are now recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of the swap
liabilities were $98.0 million (2006: carrying value of swap liabilities, $46.2 million).
(d) Concurrent with the acquisition of Schneider Corporation in April 2004, the Company assumed the liabilities outstanding in respect of
debentures previously issued by Schneider Corporation. In April 2004, the debentures provided for principal payments totalling $13.1 million
and $60.0 million, bearing interest at fixed annual rates of 10.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The debentures require annual principal
repayments over the term of the bonds that have final maturity dates of September 2010 and October 2016, respectively. These debentures
were recorded at their fair value on the acquisition closing date. The difference between the acquisition date fair value and the face value
of the bonds is amortized over the remaining life of the debentures on an effective yield basis. On December 31, 2007, the remaining book
values were $7.2 million for the 2010 debentures (2006: $9.5 million) and $53.2 million for the 2016 debentures (2006: $58.0 million) and the
remaining principal payments outstanding are $6.5 million and $47.4 million, respectively (2006: $8.3 million and $51.0 million).
(e) The Company has an unsecured revolving debt facility with a principal amount of $870.0 million. The maturity date is May 31, 2011.
This facility can be drawn in Canadian dollars, U.S. dollars, or British pounds, and bears interest based on bankers’ acceptance rates for
Canadian dollar loans and LIBOR for U.S. dollar and British pound loans. As at December 31, 2007, $136.3 million of the revolving facility
was utilized (2006: $345.0 million), of which $111.3 million was in respect of letters of credit and trade finance (2006: $107.2 million).
(f) Subsidiaries of the Company have various lending facilities, including capital leases, with interest rates ranging from non-interest
bearing to 8.1% per annum. These facilities are repayable over various terms from 2008 to 2012. As at December 31, 2007, $25.8 million
(2006: $38.6 million) was outstanding.
The Company’s various facilities with Canadian chartered banks and other lenders, all of which are unsecured, are subject to certain
financial covenants. As at December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
The Company’s estimated blended average effective cost of borrowing for 2007 was approximately 6.6% (2006: 6.5%) after taking into
account the impact of interest rate hedges.
2007 a nnua l report
53
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Required repayments of long-term debt are as follows:
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Thereafter
Total long-term debt
11. other lonG-term liaBilities
Derivative instruments (Notes 10 and 12)
Pension liabilities (Note 22)
Post-retirement benefits (Note 22)
Other
$
17,945
148,897
203,335
237,037
7,116
258,896
$
873,226
$
2006
98,729
32,338
61,783
4,061
$
2007
143,604
29,829
61,387
13,628
$
248,448
$
196,911
12. Financial instruments and risk manaGement activities
The Company uses various financial instruments in its operations, including certain components of working capital such as cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. Additionally, the Company uses short-term and long-term debt to fund operating
requirements and derivative financial instruments including interest rate and cross-currency swap agreements, foreign currency
forwards, and commodity futures and options to manage its interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity price risk.
Credit risk
The Company’s financial assets that are exposed to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
non-exchange-traded derivatives with positive fair values.
Cash and cash equivalents, are comprised primarily of investments in deposits with Canadian chartered banks who have investment
grade credit ratings. In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to credit risk from its customers, substantially all of which
are in the grocery and foodservice markets. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of new and existing customers’ financial
condition and reviews the collectibility of its trade and other accounts receivables in order to mitigate any possible credit losses.
The Company is also exposed to credit risk from the potential default by any of its counterparties on its non-exchange-traded derivatives
contracts. The Company mitigates this credit risk by dealing with counterparties who are major international financial institutions with
long-term debt ratings of single A or better that the Company anticipates will satisfy their obligations under the contracts.
interest rate risk
The Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates by using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt and utilizing interest rate
swaps as necessary to achieve the desired proportion of variable to fixed-rate debt.
During 2007, the Company terminated interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totalling $260.0 million following repayment
of floating rate borrowings with the cash proceeds received from the sale of its animal nutrition business. These swaps had been used
to effectively convert certain of the Company’s floating rate borrowings to fixed rate and were designated and accounted for as cash flow
hedges. The loss realized on termination was $2.8 million (net of tax of $1.4 million) of which $1.1 million was expensed in the year with the
balance deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income to be amortized over the term of the hedging relationship.
The notional amount of interest rate swaps was $260.0 million at December 31, 2006. The swaps had a negative fair value of $12.5 million
at December 31, 2006.
54
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
fOreign exChange risk
The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts, cross-currency interest rate swaps and foreign currency-denominated
debt to manage its exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates arising from transactions and balances in currencies other than
Canadian dollar.
The Company uses cross-currency interest rate swaps to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange rates related to U.S. dollar-
denominated debt. These swaps are used primarily to effectively convert fixed-rate U.S. dollar-denominated notes payable to fixed-rate
notes denominated in Canadian dollars and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The notional amounts of cross-currency interest rate
swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges totalled US$477.0 million at December 31, 2007 (2006: US$477.0 million) with maturity
dates ranging from December 2009 to December 2014. These swaps had a negative fair value of $137.2 million at December 31, 2007
(2006: negative fair value of $94.2 million) of which $2.1 million was recorded in other current liabilities and $135.1 million in other
long-term liabilities.
The Company also uses cross-currency swaps to effectively convert fixed-rate U.S. dollar notes payable to floating rate Canadian dollar
notes. These swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges. The notional amounts of cross-currency swap agreements designated as fair
value hedges totalled US$15.0 million at December 31, 2007 (2006: US$75.0 million) with a maturity date of December 2009. The swaps had
a negative fair value of $8.8 million at December 31, 2007 (2006: negative fair value of $32.2 million) of which $0.3 million was recorded in
other current liabilities and $8.5 million in other non-current liabilities.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts and interest rates of the Company’s cross-currency interest rate swaps:
(In thousands of currency units)
Maturity
2009 (Note 10 (a))
2009 (Note 10 (a))
2010 (Note 10 (b))
2011 (Note 10 (c))
2014 (Note 10 (c))
Notional
amount
US$
15,000
125,000
75,000
177,000
100,000
Receive
rate
6.3%
6.3%
8.5%
5.2%
5.6%
Notional
amount
CAD$
23,273
144,606
110,775
231,025
138,000
Pay
rate
BA(i) + 2.6%
6.2% (ii)
7.7%
5.4%
6.0%
(i)
(ii)
Three-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate.
Swap notional amounts are not exchanged at inception and maturity. These swaps hedge the coupon payments on USD notes payable by converting the U.S. dollar interest into
Canadian dollar interest.
The Company uses foreign currency forwards from time to time to hedge a portion of its anticipated foreign currency-denominated
transactions. The primary currencies to which the Company is exposed include the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. Qualifying foreign
currency forward contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2007, $58.0 million of anticipated foreign
currency-denominated sales have been hedged with the underlying foreign currency forwards settling at various dates beginning
February 2008 through March 2009. The aggregate fair value of these forward contracts as at December 31, 2007 was a $1.4 million
gain and was recorded in other current assets.
The Company designates certain U.S. dollar-denominated notes payable as net investment hedges of U.S. operations.
At December 31, 2007, the amount of notes payable designated as a hedge of the Company’s net investment in U.S. operations
was US$160.0 million (2006: US$160.0 million). Foreign exchange gains and losses on the designated notes payable are recorded in
Shareholders’ equity in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive income and offset translation
adjustments on the underlying net assets of U.S. operations, which also are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Prior to January 1, 2007, foreign exchange gains and losses on the designated notes payable were recorded in Unrealized Foreign
Currency Adjustment within Shareholders’ equity. The gain on the net investment hedge recorded in Other Comprehensive Loss for the
year was $29.9 million before taxes in 2007 (2006: $nil).
2007 a nnua l report
55
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
COmmOdity priCe risk
The Company is exposed to price risk related to forecasted purchases and sales of live hogs and forecasted purchases of certain other
agricultural commodities used as raw materials including feed grains and wheat. The Company may use fixed price contracts with
suppliers as well as exchange-traded futures and options to manage its exposure to price fluctuations.
Derivatives designated as a hedge of an anticipated or forecast transaction are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Changes in the
fair value of the hedging derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income to the extent the hedge is effective in mitigating the
exposure to the related anticipated transaction, and subsequently reclassified to earnings to offset the impact of the hedged items when
they affect earnings. Unrealized gains on commodity positions designated as cash flow hedges totalled $5.6 million at December 31, 2007
and was recorded in other current assets.
The Company also uses futures to minimize the price risk assumed under forward priced contracts with suppliers. The intent of the
strategy is to make the forward priced commodities cost nearly the same as cash market purchases at the date of delivery. The futures
contracts are designated and accounted for as fair value hedges. Unrealized gains on commodity positions designated as fair value
hedges totalled $0.4 million at December 31, 2007 and was recorded in other current assets.
The Company has elected to apply the normal purchase and sales classification to certain contracts that are entered into for the purpose
of procuring commodities to be used in production.
The amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2007, was not material.
fair value Of finanCial instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their fair values due to the
immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Effective January 1, 2007, all derivatives are recorded on the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value. Prior to 2007, only derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting were carried at fair value.
The carrying and fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of commodity, interest rate, and
foreign currency exposures as at December 31, 2007 are as follows:
Futures contracts to hedge commodity price exposure
Cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge
U.S. dollar-denominated notes payable
Foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge
transactions denominated in foreign currencies
Total
Current
assets
Current
liabilities
Other
long-term
liabilities
$
5,998
$
—
$
—
—
1,388
7,386
$
2,446
—
143,604
—
$
2,446
$
143,604
The following table illustrates the carrying and fair values of the Company’s long-term debt:
2007
2006
Carrying
amount
Fair
value
Carrying
amount
Fair
value
Long-term debt (including current portion)
$
(873,226)
$
(892,229)
$ (1,267,924)
$ (1,284,252)
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated based on discounted future cash flows using current rates for similar
financial instruments subject to similar risks and maturities. The fair values of the Company’s derivative financial instruments used to
manage exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks were estimated using current market measures for interest rates and foreign
exchange rates. Commodity futures and options contracts are exchange-traded and fair value was determined based on exchange prices.
56
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
13. restructurinG and other related costs
During 2007, the Company recorded restructuring and other related costs of $125.0 million ($103.9 million after-tax). $122.3 million of this
related to continuing operations and the balance is disclosed as part of discontinued operations (Note 3). The majority of these costs
related to asset impairments on the Company’s hog production assets. A goodwill impairment of $20.7 million was recorded in the hog
operations due to the sale of the animal nutrition business in the second quarter, $63.1 million of impairments were recorded in the hog
production operations in the fourth quarter; $27.0 million of which related to an impairment on the Ontario and Alberta hog production
assets which were disposed of in asset sales closing January 2008 (Note 26) and $36.1 million related to an impairment on the remaining
hog production assets retained by the Company. The balance of restructuring and other related costs related to restructuring in the
Meat Products Group, including the closure of two primary processing plants and the closure of a red meat processing facility.
During 2006, the Company recorded restructuring and other related costs of $64.6 million ($50.4 million after-tax). The portion of these
restructuring and other related costs that related to continuing operations was $63.2 million and the balance is disclosed as part of
discontinued operations (Note 3). The majority of these restructuring and other related costs relate to the closure of a poultry plant
in Nova Scotia, the closure of a fresh bakery plant in British Columbia and the write-down of certain hog investments in Alberta.
The following table provides a summary of costs recognized and cash payments made in respect of the above-mentioned restructuring
initiatives in 2007 and 2006 and the corresponding liability as at December 31, 2007 and 2006, all on a pre-tax basis:
Restructuring and other related costs
Charges
Cash payments
Non-cash items
Balance at December 31, 2006
Charges
Cash payments
Non-cash items
Asset
impairment
and
accelerated
depreciation
Severance
Site closing
Retention
Pension
Total
$
$
$
$
16,034
(1,862)
—
14,172
8,667
(13,128)
—
$
$
6,317
(1,286)
—
5,031
5,569
(7,977)
(589)
$
$
39,217
—
(39,217)
—
97,443
—
(97,443)
$
$
3,050
(35)
—
3,015
9,497
(6,983)
—
$
$
—
—
—
—
3,800
—
(3,800)
64,618
(3,183)
(39,217)
22,218
124,976
(28,088)
(101,832)
Balance at December 31, 2007
$
9,711
$
2,034
$
—
$
5,529
$
—
$
17,274
14. shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity consists of the following:
Share capital
Retained earnings
Contributed surplus
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 15)
Treasury stock (i)
$
2007
797,658
390,784
38,462
(35,423)
(30,054)
$
2006
769,696
204,415
30,140
(9,809)
—
$ 1,161,427
$
994,442
(i)
During 2007, the Company repurchased 2,169,000 common shares through a trust for cash consideration of $30.0 million for the purpose of funding grants under the Restricted Share Unit
Plan (Note 16).
The authorized share capital of Maple Leaf Foods consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of non-
voting common shares. As at December 31, 2007, there were 107,600,271 voting common shares issued and outstanding (2006: 105,135,866)
and 22,000,000 non-voting common shares issued and outstanding (2006: 22,000,000). The non-voting common shares carry rights identical
to those of the common shares, except that they have no voting rights other than as specified in the Canada Business Corporations Act.
2007 a nnua l report
57
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Each non-voting common share is convertible at any time into one common share at the option of the holder. Holders of non-voting
common shares have a separate class vote on any amendment to the articles of the Company, if the non-voting common shares would
be affected by such amendment in a manner that is different from the holders of common shares.
Details of share transactions relating to both voting and non-voting shares during the years are as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2005
Issued for cash on exercise of options (Note 16)
Repurchased for cancellation (i)
Balance, December 31, 2006
Issued for cash on exercise of options (Note 16)
Balance, December 31, 2007
Number of
shares
127,704,812
1,340,654
(1,909,600)
127,135,866
2,464,405
129,600,271
Share
capital
765,666
15,556
(11,526)
769,696
27,962
$
$
$
797,658
(i)
During 2006, the Company repurchased for cancellation 1,909,600 common shares pursuant to a normal course issuer bid at an average exercise price of $12.07. The excess of the
purchase cost over the book value of the shares was charged to retained earnings.
15. accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following:
Years ended December 31,
Balance at the beginning of the period – net (i)
Transition adjustment as of January 1, 2007 (Note 2(p))
Adjusted balance at the beginning of the period
Change in accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment – net (i)
Change in unrealized derivative loss on cash flow hedges – net (ii)
Other comprehensive income for the period
Balance at end of period
$
2007
(9,809)
(32,198)
(42,007)
(16,036)
22,620
6,584
$
2006
(18,558)
—
(18,558)
8,749
—
8,749
$
(35,423)
$
(9,809)
(i)
Balance at the beginning of the current period is net of tax of $9.1 million. The change in accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment is net of tax of $10.6 million for the
12 months ended December 31, 2007 (2006: $9.1 million).
(ii)
Change in unrealized derivative loss on cash flow hedges is net of tax of $11.5 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2007 (2006: $nil).
The Company estimates that $0.1 million of net unrealized derivative gain included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss will be
reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months. The actual amount of this reclassification will be impacted by future changes in
the fair value of financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and the actual amount reclassified could differ from this estimated
amount. During the year, a loss of approximately $12.8 million net of tax of $6.8 million was released to income from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss, which is included in the net change for the period.
16. stock-Based compensation
Under the Maple Leaf Foods Share Incentive Plan as at December 31, 2007, the Company may grant additional options to its employees
and employees of its subsidiaries to purchase up to 8,440,624 shares of common stock and may grant additional Restricted Share Units
(“RSUs”) entitling employees to receive up to 1,804,900 in common shares. Options and RSUs are granted from time to time by the Board
of Directors on the recommendation of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The vesting conditions are specified by the
Board of Directors and may include continued service of the employee with the Company and/or other criteria based on measures of the
Company’s performance.
58
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
stOCk OptiOns
A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options as at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and changes during these years
is presented below:
Outstanding, beginning of year
Exercised
Granted
Expired and terminated
Outstanding, end of year
Options currently exercisable
2007
2006
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
—
$
$
12.45
10.15
14.24
12.84
12.30
Options
outstanding
11,448,616
(1,340,654)
119,000
(607,433)
9,619,529
6,424,579
Weighted
average
exercise
price
$
$
$
12.37
11.60
15.04
13.31
12.45
11.63
Options
outstanding
9,619,529
(2,069,305)
—
(1,271,974)
6,278,250
5,172,400
All outstanding share options vest and become exercisable over a period not exceeding six years (time vesting) from the date of grant
and/or upon the achievement of specified performance targets (based on return on net assets, earnings, share price or total stock return
relative to an index). The options have a term of between seven and ten years.
The number of options outstanding at December 31, 2007, together with details regarding time and performance vesting conditions of the
options, is as follows:
Options outstanding
exercisable
time vesting only
performance vesting
Options currently
Options subject to
Options subject to
Range of
exercise
prices
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Number
outstanding
Weighted
average
remaining
term
Number
(in years) exercisable
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Weighted
average
exercise
Number
price outstanding
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Number
outstanding
$10.00 to $10.97
$11.64 to $12.65
$13.21 to $13.76
$14.56 to $14.90
$14.90 to $16.88
2,677,400 $
450,600
1,041,100
895,650
1,213,500
$10.00 to $16.88
6,278,250 $
10.55
12.36
13.24
14.74
16.36
12.84
1.8
1.3
3.7
1.6
4.7
2.6
$
2,655,000
448,300
753,700
886,800
428,600
5,712,400
$
10.55
12.36
13.23
14.74
16.37
12.30
— $
—
—
—
16,300
16,300 $
—
—
—
—
16.37
16.37
$
22,400
2,300
287,400
8,850
768,600
1,089,550
$
10.66
11.97
13.24
14.82
16.34
15.39
During 2006, the Company granted 119,000 stock options at a weighted average exercise price per share of $15.04. The fair value of the
total options issued is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Expected option life (in years)
Risk-free interest rate
Expected annual volatility
Dividend yield
2006
4.4
4.0%
27.0%
1.2%
The estimated fair value of options granted during 2006 was $0.3 million. This value is amortized to income over the vesting period of the
related options. The amortization of the fair value of options in 2007 is $2.2 million (2006: $4.0 million) and is recorded in contributed surplus.
2007 a nnua l report
59
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
restriCted stOCk units
The Company has two plans under which RSUs may be granted to employees. The awards under the Share Incentive Plan (adopted in
2004) are satisfied by the issuance of treasury shares on maturity, while the awards granted under the Restricted Share Unit Plan (adopted
in 2006) are satisfied by shares to be purchased on the open market via a trust established for that purpose.
In both plans, RSUs are subject to time vesting and performance vesting based on the achievement of specified stock performance targets
relative to a North American index of food stocks. Under the 2004 Plan, one common share in the capital of the Company will be issued to
the holder on vesting. All outstanding RSUs vest over a period of between three years and five years from the date of grant. Under the 2006
Plan, up to 1.5 common shares in the capital of the Company can be distributed for each RSU if the performance of the Company exceeds
the target level. All outstanding RSUs vest over a period between 1.5 years and three years from the date of grant.
A summary of the status of the Company’s RSU plan as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and changes during these years is presented below:
Outstanding, beginning of year
Granted (i)
Issued (ii)
Expired and terminated (iii)
Outstanding, end of year
2007
2006
Weighted
average
price at
grant
$
$
13.28
14.88
13.13
14.11
13.81
RSUs
outstanding
1,578,625
2,017,060
—
(137,250)
3,458,435
Weighted
average
price at
grant
$
$
14.82
12.10
—
14.13
13.28
RSUs
outstanding
3,458,435
1,586,525
(395,100)
(341,760)
4,308,100
(i)
(ii)
In 2007, the Company granted 1,586,525 (2006: 1,956,560) RSUs under the Restricted Share Unit Plan. In 2006, the Company granted 60,500 RSUs under the Share Incentive Plan.
In 2007, the Company issued 395,100 shares under the Share Incentive Plan.
(iii)
In 2007, the RSUs expired and terminated consist of 237,150 (2006: 128,250) under the Share Incentive Plan and 104,610 (2006: 9,000) under the Restricted Share Unit Plan.
The fair value of the RSUs granted in 2007 on the date of grant was $18.8 million (2006: $22.4 million), after taking account of forfeiture due
to performance, which is amortized to income on a pro rata basis over the vesting periods of the related RSUs. The amortization of the fair
value of the RSUs in 2007 is $13.2 million (2006: $6.4 million).
The fair value of the total RSUs granted in the year is based on the following weighted average assumptions:
Expected RSU life (in years)
Forfeiture rate
Discount rate
Dividend yield
2007
2.5
15.0%
4.0%
1.2%
2006
2.8
15.4%
4.0%
1.2%
60
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
17. earninGs per share
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”):
Years ended December 31,
Basic
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Stock options (i)
Diluted
Continuing operations (ii)
Discontinued operations
2007
Weighted
average
number of
shares (iii)
$
$
$
127.3
127.3
127.3
2.8
130.1
130.1
Net
earnings
(23,232)
230,376
207,144
—
(23,232)
230,376
$
$
$
2006
Weighted
average
number of
shares (iii)
$
$
$
127.5
127.5
127.5
1.9
129.4
129.4
EPS
Net
earnings
(0.18) $
1.81
$
1.63
(0.04)
(19,991)
24,516
4,525
—
(0.18) $
1.77
(19,991)
24,516
$
207,144
130.1
$
1.59
$
4,525
129.4
$
EPS (iv)
(0.16)
0.19
0.04
(0.01)
(0.16)
0.19
0.03
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Excludes the effect of approximately 9.0 million options and restricted stock units (2006: 9.5 million) to purchase common shares that are anti-dilutive.
As a result of the net loss from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, all potential dilutive stock options were considered anti-dilutive.
In millions.
Basic EPS does not add due to rounding.
18. Goodwill impairment
The Company entered into an agreement to sell its animal nutrition business in the second quarter of 2007 and the terms and conditions
of sale placed certain restrictions on the operations of the two retained feed mills. This resulted in a change in the Company’s assessment
of future cash flows of its remaining feed and hog operations. As a result, the Company determined, in the second quarter, that the
goodwill related to the remaining feed and hog operations was fully impaired and recorded an impairment charge of $20.7 million, which
is included in restructuring and other related costs (Note 13).
19. other income
Gain on sale of property and equipment
Proceeds from insurance claim
Earnings (loss) from real estate operations
Dividends received
Rental income
Gain (loss) on sale of investments, net
Loss from associated companies
20. interest eXpense
Interest expense on long-term debt
Other interest expense, net
2007
2,341
1,854
(148)
—
355
176
—
4,578
2007
88,758
5,364
94,122
$
$
$
$
2006
2,051
—
1,047
332
191
(204)
(770)
2,647
2006
89,110
1,094
90,204
$
$
$
$
2007 a nnua l report
61
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
21. income taXes
Income tax expense varies from the amount that would be computed by applying the combined federal and provincial statutory income tax
rates as a result of the following:
Income tax expense according to combined statutory rate of 36.0% (2006: 36.1%)
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
Adjustment to net future tax liabilities for changes in enacted tax laws and rates
Rate differences in other jurisdictions
Manufacturing and processing credit
Non-taxable gains
Stock-based compensation
Dividends not taxable
Outside basis differences on investments
Impairment of goodwill
Non-deductible expenses
Pre-acquisition tax liability
Valuation allowance on U.S. tax losses
Other
2007
$
(4,612)
$
(9,913)
(7,285)
208
1,893
2,559
(199)
1,605
7,134
2,018
—
5,704
1,689
2006
7,963
(3,389)
(6,769)
(275)
5,505
3,173
—
—
—
1,018
5,500
21,434
1,639
$
801
$
35,799
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the future tax assets and future tax liabilities at
December 31 are presented below:
Future tax assets:
Non-capital loss carryforwards
Accrued liabilities
Tax on intra-subsidiary asset transfer
Valuation allowance
Investment in subsidiary
Other
Future tax liabilities:
Property and equipment
Cash basis farming
Investments in associated companies
Net pension asset
Goodwill and other intangibles
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on long-term debt
Other
Classified in the consolidated financial statements as:
Future tax asset – current
Future tax asset – non-current
Future tax liability – non-current
Net future tax liability
62
m a ple lea F Foods
2007
2006
$
81,966
44,418
19,814
(27,138)
13,028
9,767
$
130,200
43,116
21,574
(21,434)
—
6,498
$
141,855
$
179,954
$
35,849
12,959
1,135
70,232
16,583
12,407
6,379
$
60,195
21,622
1,135
71,335
15,691
7,876
6,375
$
155,544
$
184,229
$
25,409
22,837
(61,935)
$
2,128
23,464
(29,867)
$
(13,689)
$
(4,275)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3465, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company reviews all available positive and negative
evidence to evaluate the recoverability of future tax assets. This includes a review of the Company’s cumulative losses in recent years, the
carry forward period related to the tax losses, and the tax planning strategies available to the Company. Upon applying these accounting
rules to the Company’s accumulated tax losses in the U.S. frozen bakery business, there continues to be sufficient uncertainty surrounding
the timing and amount of losses that will be utilized. Accordingly, during the year the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance
of US$5.4 million ($5.7 million) against current year U.S. tax losses and a valuation allowance has been recorded for all the accumulated
tax losses in the U.S. frozen bakery business.
22. pensions and other post-retirement BeneFits
Information about the Company’s defined benefit plans as at December 31, in aggregate, is as follows:
Post-retirement
benefits
Total
pensions
2007
Total
2006
Total
Accrued benefit obligation:
Balance, beginning of year
Current service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gains) losses
Employee contributions
Plan amendments
Contractual termination benefits
Curtailments
Balance, end of year
Plan assets:
Fair value, beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Employee contributions
Benefits paid
Asset transfer to Company defined
contribution plan
Fair value, end of year
Funded status – plan surplus (deficit)
Unamortized transition amount
Unamortized actuarial losses
Unamortized prior service costs
Other
$ 1,135,138
26,804
56,623
(67,564)
25,922
5,421
—
—
—
$ 1,182,344
$ 1,321,304
162,814
39,924
5,421
(67,564)
$
68,923
1,041
3,422
(2,856)
7,003
—
—
—
—
$ 1,113,421
22,020
55,917
(76,185)
(34,450)
4,734
16,133
1,900
(400)
$ 1,182,344
23,061
59,339
(79,041)
(27,447)
4,734
16,133
1,900
(400)
$
77,533
$ 1,103,090
$ 1,180,623
$
$
$
—
—
2,856
—
(2,856)
—
—
(77,533)
—
13,289
—
—
$ 1,446,074
(15,825)
19,850
4,734
(76,185)
$ 1,446,074
(15,825)
22,706
4,734
(79,041)
(16,244)
(16,244)
(15,825)
$ 1,362,404
$ 1,362,404
$ 1,446,074
$
259,314
(134,594)
123,249
13,970
(239)
$
181,781
(134,594)
136,538
13,970
(239)
$
263,730
(153,174)
42,007
932
(198)
Net accrued benefit asset (liability), end of year
$
(64,244)
$
261,700
$
197,456
$
153,297
2007 a nnua l report
63
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
Other long-term assets
Accounts payable and accrued charges
Other long-term liabilities
Pension benefit expense (income):
Current service cost – defined benefit
Current service cost – defined contribution
Interest cost
Actual return on plan assets
Difference between actual and expected return
Actuarial (gains) losses recognized
Difference between actual and recognized actuarial (gains) losses in the year
Amortization of transitional amount
Difference between amortization of prior service costs and actual plan amendments in the year
Plan amendments
Curtailment loss
Contractual termination benefits
$
$
2007
292,798
4,126
91,216
2007
22,020
25,112
55,917
15,825
(122,544)
(34,450)
35,025
(18,580)
(15,438)
16,133
2,000
1,900
$
$
2006
251,959
4,541
94,121
2006
25,849
25,306
53,333
(162,814)
65,351
24,758
(23,447)
(18,580)
96
—
—
—
Net benefit plan income
$
(17,080)
$
(10,148)
The significant actuarial assumptions adopted in measuring the Company’s accrued benefit obligations are as follows:
2007
5.00%
5.25%
7.50%
3.50%
2007
1,041
3,422
7,003
(7,003)
$
$
4,463
2006
5.00%
5.00%
7.50%
3.50%
2006
956
3,290
1,164
(1,183)
4,227
$
$
1% Increase
1% Decrease
$
3,364
231
$
(3,786)
(254)
Discount rate used to calculate net benefit plan expense
Discount rate used to calculate year end benefit obligation
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Other post-retirement benefits expense:
Current service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial losses recognized
Difference between actual and expected actuarial gain
Impact of 1% change in health care cost trend:
Effect of end-of-year obligation
Aggregate of 2007 current service cost and interest cost
64
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Measurement dates:
2007 expense
Balance sheet
December 31, 2006
December 31, 2007
The pension assets are invested in the following asset categories at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
Asset category
Equity securities
Debt securities
2007
62%
38%
100%
2006
61%
39%
100%
23. investment in canada Bread company, limited (“canada Bread”)
During 2007, the Company acquired 122,900 shares in Canada Bread for $6.5 million, increasing its ownership to 88.0%.
The allocation of the acquisition of shares is as follows:
Goodwill
Other intangibles
Minority interest
Total purchase cost
24. acquisitions and divestitures
2007
2007
3,437
239
2,845
6,521
$
$
(a) On August 17, 2007, the Company acquired La Fornaia Ltd. (“La Fornaia”) a leading producer of a range of specialty Italian breads
for total consideration of £18.9 million ($40.3 million). The Company has allocated £3.7 million ($7.9 million) of the purchase price to the
identifiable net assets of La Fornaia at the acquisition date, and £15.2 million ($32.4 million) to goodwill. The Company has not yet finalized
the purchase equation for this acquisition.
(b) On August 31, 2007, the Company purchased the remaining interest in its subsidiary Cold Springs Farm Limited (“Cold Springs”)
for $10.0 million with $5.0 million paid in cash and $5.0 million due in the third quarter of 2008. The Company has not yet finalized the
purchase equation for this acquisition.
(c) On July 20, 2007, the Company completed the sale of its animal nutrition business (Note 3).
(d) On February 26, 2007, the Company acquired 100% ownership in Pâtisserie Chevalier Inc. (“Chevalier”) for $8.2 million. Chevalier is
a leading producer of single-portion snack cake products in Quebec. The Company has allocated $6.4 million of the purchase price to the
identifiable net assets of Chevalier at the acquisition date, and $1.8 million to goodwill. As at December 31, 2007, the Company had not yet
finalized the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
(e) During the first quarter, the Company completed the sale of its European seafood and convenience businesses in Germany. The sales
of these businesses will not have a significant impact on ongoing earnings or cash flows.
(f) On January 16, 2007, the Company purchased 122,900 additional shares in Canada Bread for $6.5 million, increasing the Company’s
ownership interest in Canada Bread from 87.5% to 88.0% (Note 23).
(g) During 2007, the Company completed several transactions comprising both the purchase and sale of interests in certain hog
investment companies related to the realignment of its hog production business. These transactions did not have a significant impact on
the financial position of the Company.
2007 a nnua l report
65
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Details of net assets acquired and purchase adjustments made in 2007 are as follows:
Cash (bank indebtedness)
Net working capital
Investments
Property and equipment
Other assets
Goodwill
Other intangibles
Future income taxes
Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities
Minority interest
Total purchase cost
La Fornaia
Chevalier
$
$
(25)
2,349
—
5,953
—
32,419
—
104
—
(469)
—
$
40,331
$
(15)
780
—
5,827
148
1,787
—
(85)
—
(221)
—
8,221
$
Other (i)
—
955
(5,979)
12,525
(130)
(2,943)
12,727
(630)
(10,318)
(322)
10,536
$
2007
Total
(40)
4,084
(5,979)
24,305
18
31,263
12,727
(611)
(10,318)
(1,012)
10,536
$
16,421
$
64,973
(i)
Other includes the impact of the finalization of the purchase equations for Royal Touch, FCC and Avance in 2007 as well as other small acquisitions in 2007.
2006
(h) On November 27, 2006, the Company purchased The French Croissant Company Ltd. (“FCC”) and Avance U.K. Limited (“Avance”),
two related bakeries in the U.K. for total consideration of £29.2 million ($64.0 million). FCC markets croissants and specialty goods across
the U.K., and Avance is a leading supplier of fresh, frozen and long-life specialty bakery items. The Company has completed the purchase
equation and has allocated $7.5 million to the identifiable net tangible assets of FCC and Avance and $56.5 million to goodwill and
intangibles. The acquired intangible assets include $8.8 million allocated to customer relationships that are being amortized on
a straight-line basis over their useful lives to a maximum of 25 years.
(i) On October 2, 2006, the Company acquired the remaining interest in Royal Touch Foods Inc. (“Royal Touch”), a pre-packaged
sandwich supplier based in Toronto, Ontario. The Company paid $3.8 million, net of estimated cash acquired of $0.8 million for the shares
of Royal Touch. The investment in Royal Touch had been accounted for on an equity basis prior to this purchase. In 2007, there were minor
adjustments to the purchase price and the purchase price allocation was completed.
In August 2006, the Company purchased an additional 17% interest in its subsidiary Cold Springs Farm Limited (“Cold Springs”)
(j)
for $5.0 million in cash, thereby increasing its ownership to 66%.
(k) During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company acquired the remaining interest in several partly-owned hog production investments
that had previously been accounted for on an equity basis for a total of $2.9 million.
(l) On March 24, 2006, the Company acquired Harvestime Limited (“Harvestime”), a bakery in Walsall, England for £1.0 million
($2.0 million). Harvestime is a producer of par-baked breads, rolls and specialty bakery products. As at December 31, 2006, the Company
had finalized the purchase price allocation, and goodwill of $0.7 million resulting from the transaction has been included in the total assets
of the Bakery Products Group.
66
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Details of net assets acquired and purchase adjustments made in 2006 are in the following tables. Note that some figures have changed
to reflect Management’s best estimate of fair value:
Cash (bank indebtedness)
Net working capital (deficit)
Investments
Property and equipment
Goodwill
Other intangibles
Future income taxes
Minority interest
Total purchase cost
Consideration:
Cash
Accounts payable, accrued
charges, and long-term debt
$
$
$
Royal
Touch
812
822
(1,134)
574
3,220
—
(44)
—
4,250
4,250
—
$
$
$
FCC and
Avance
—
(862)
—
14,293
50,512
—
—
—
63,943
$
Other
(945)
4,071
(3,521)
10,274
1,052
2,162
(1,228)
5,000
$
16,865
63,943
$
12,660
—
4,205
$
$
$
2006
Total
(133)
4,031
(4,655)
25,141
54,784
2,162
(1,272)
5,000
85,058
80,853
4,205
$
4,250
$
63,943
$
16,865
$
85,058
25. continGencies and commitments
(a) The Company has been named as defendant in several legal actions and is subject to various risks and contingencies arising in the
normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that the outcome of these uncertainties will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s financial position.
In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries enter into sales commitments with customers, and purchase
(b)
commitments with suppliers. These commitments are for varying terms and can provide for fixed or variable prices. With respect to certain
contracts, the Company has the right to acquire at fair value, and the suppliers have the right to sell back to the Company, certain assets
which have an estimated fair value of $10.6 million (2006: $12.4 million). The Company believes that these contracts serve to reduce risk,
and it is not anticipated that losses will be incurred on these contracts.
(c) The Company has operating lease, rent and other commitments that require minimum annual payments as follows:
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Thereafter
$
62,888
51,364
37,615
29,611
22,493
76,700
$
280,671
2007 a nnua l report
67
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
26. suBsequent events
On January 29, 2008, the Company acquired the shares of Aliments Martel Inc., a leading manufacturer and distributor of sandwiches,
meals and sweet goods based in Quebec for an initial purchase price of $42.4 million plus contingent consideration of up to $23.0 million
based on financial performance over the next three years.
On January 14, 2008, the Company purchased the assets of Central By-Products, a rendering business located near London, Ontario
for $18.0 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company entered into transactions to sell most of its Ontario hog production operations and all its
wholly-owned hog production investments in Alberta (Note 4). These transactions closed in January 2008.
27. seGmented Financial inFormation
The Company’s operations are classified into the following three primary business segments, which have been used for the operating
segment disclosures for all years presented:
(a) The Meat Products Group comprises value-added processed packaged meats; chilled meal entrees and lunch kits; value-added pork,
poultry and turkey products; and global meat sales.
(b) Agribusiness Group includes the Company’s animal by-products recycling and hog production operations. Results and financial
position of the animal nutrition business sold in 2007 and previously disclosed in the Agribusiness Group are disclosed as discontinued
operations (Note 3).
(c) Bakery Products Group comprises the Company’s 88.0% ownership in Canada Bread Company, Limited, a producer of fresh and
frozen par-baked bakery products, and fresh pasta and sauces.
68
m a ple lea F Foods
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Sales to customers
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
Earnings from operations before restructuring and other related costs
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
Capital expenditures
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
Depreciation and amortization
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
Total assets
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
Non-allocated assets
Goodwill
Meat Products Group
Agribusiness Group
Bakery Products Group
2007
2006
$ 3,458,055
240,956
1,510,629
$ 5,209,640
$ 3,745,654
245,438
1,333,664
$ 5,324,756
$
90,193
(7,841)
116,704
$
74,400
(2,475)
100,877
$
199,056
$
172,802
$
132,220
15,068
89,372
$
91,271
15,210
49,454
$
236,660
$
155,935
$
68,806
20,536
51,839
$
66,987
17,323
46,426
$
141,181
$
130,736
$ 1,560,244
302,999
823,137
311,464
$ 2,997,844
$
450,929
2,058
364,490
$ 1,551,502
702,534
810,940
210,750
$ 3,275,726
$
457,039
19,885
352,717
$
817,477
$
829,641
The Agribusiness Group operating earnings include the Company’s share of earnings from equity-accounted hog investments in the year
in the amount of $0.5 million (2006: $(0.4) million).
During the year, total sales to customers outside of Canada were $1,478.3 million (2006: $1,608.1 million) of which $764.7 million
(2006: $823.8 million) were sales to customers in the U.S.
2007 a nnua l report
69
Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
corporate Governance
The Board of Directors and Management of the Company are
committed to maintaining a high standard of corporate governance.
The Board has responsibility for the overall stewardship of the
Company and discharges such responsibility by reviewing,
discussing and approving the Company’s strategic planning
and organizational structure and supervising management with
a view to preserving and enhancing the underlying value of the
Company. Management of the business within this process and
structure is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer and
senior management.
The Board has adopted guidelines to assist it in meeting its
corporate governance responsibilities. The role of the Board,
the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman, Lead Director and the
individual committees are clearly delineated. Together with the
Chairman, Lead Director and the Corporate Governance Committee,
the Board assesses its processes and practices regularly to ensure
its governance objectives are met.
composition oF the Board oF directors
The Board is comprised of experienced directors with a diversity
of relevant skills and competencies. The Board of Directors has
assessed each of the Company’s 10 non-management directors
to be independent. These 10 directors are also considered
independent under the relevant securities regulations.
A more comprehensive analysis of the Company’s approach to
corporate governance matters is included in the Management
Proxy Circular for the April 24, 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
Board oF directors
purdy CrawfOrd O.C.
Counsel, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Law firm)
Mr. Crawford, 76, is a director of several Canadian companies.
Until February 2000, he was the non-Executive Chairman of Imasco
Limited and CT Financial Services. Mr. Crawford is a Companion
of the Order of Canada and a member of the Canadian Business
Hall of Fame.
Director since: 1995
jeffrey gandz
Professor, Managing Director – Program Design, Richard Ivey
School of Business, University of Western Ontario
Dr. Gandz, 63, has been a consultant for many Canadian and
multinational corporations and government ministries, and
is the author of several books, many articles and government
reports on a variety of subjects, including leadership and
organizational effectiveness.
Director since: 1999
james f. hankinsOn
President and Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Power Generation
(Electric generation company)
Mr. Hankinson, 64, is a director of several Canadian companies.
Mr. Hankinson retired as President and Chief Executive Officer
of New Brunswick Power Corporation in 2002. He was President
and Chief Operating Officer of Canadian Pacific Limited until 1995.
Director since: 1995
rObert w. hiller
Corporate Director
Mr. Hiller, 71, has served as a director and senior officer
of a number of large multinational food companies in the United
States and in Canada. Until 1991, he was Senior Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Campbell Soup Company Limited.
Director since: 1995
Chaviva m. hOsek
President and Chief Executive Officer, The Canadian Institute
for Advanced Research (Research Institute)
Dr. Hosek, 61, received her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1973.
She was Director of Policy and Research from 1993 to 2000 in the
Prime Minister’s Office. Her career has included a term as Minister
of Housing for the Province of Ontario and a 13-year period as
an academic at the University of Toronto. Dr. Hosek serves as a
director of the Central European University and AllerGen NCE.
Director since: 2002
70
m a ple lea F Foods
Corporate Governance and Board of Directors
dOnald e. lOadman
Corporate Director and Business Consultant
Mr. Loadman’s career includes service in Canada and the
United States with three multinational food and packaged goods
companies. Until 1991, Mr. Loadman was Chairman of Pillsbury
International. Mr. Loadman, 75, is a resident of California.
Until 1996, Mr. Loadman was Chairman of Ault Foods Limited.
Director since: 1995
diane e. mCgarry
Corporate Director
Ms. McGarry, 58, has over 30 years’ experience with Xerox
including five years in Canada as Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Xerox Canada from 1993 to 1998. Prior to
retiring in 2005, Ms. McGarry held the position of Chief Marketing
Officer, Xerox Corporation.
Director since: 2005
g. wallaCe f. mCCain O.C.
Chairman, Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
Mr. McCain, 77, was appointed Chairman following the acquisition
of the Company in April 1995. Mr. McCain co-founded McCain
Foods Limited in 1956 which has grown to become one of the
largest frozen food companies in the world. Mr. McCain was
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of McCain Foods Limited
until 1994 and is currently its Vice-Chairman and director of other
associated companies within the McCain Foods Group. Mr. McCain
is an Officer of the Order of Canada.
Director since: 1995
j. sCOtt mCCain
President and Chief Operating Officer, Agribusiness Group,
Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
Before joining Maple Leaf Foods Inc. in April 1995, Mr. McCain was
Vice-President for Production of McCain Foods Limited in Canada,
a company he joined in 1978 and where he held progressively
senior positions in manufacturing and operations. He is a
director of Canada Bread Company, Limited and McCain Capital
Corporation. Mr. McCain, 51, is a director of McCain Foods Group.
Director since: 1995
miChael h. mCCain
President and Chief Executive Officer, Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
Mr. McCain, 49, joined Maple Leaf Foods Inc. in April 1995 as
President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Maple Leaf
Foods, Mr. McCain spent 16 years with McCain Foods Limited
in Canada and the United States and was, at the time of leaving
in March 1995, President and Chief Executive Officer of McCain
Foods USA Inc. In January 1999, Mr. McCain was appointed Chief
Executive Officer of Maple Leaf Foods. He is the Chairman and
director of Canada Bread Company, Limited, a director of McCain
Foods Group Ltd., the American Meat Institute, and Royal Bank
of Canada. He is a past director of American Frozen Food Institute
and Bombardier Inc. Mr. McCain also serves on the Board
of Trustees of The Hospital for Sick Children.
Director since: 1995
j. edward newall O.C.
Chairman, Newall & Associates (Consulting firm)
Mr. Newall, 72, is also Chairman Emeritus of both NOVA Chemicals
Corporation and Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. He was Chairman
of NOVA Chemicals Corporation from 1999 to 2007, when he retired.
He served as a director of Alcan Inc. until December 2004 and
as a director of Royal Bank Financial Group until January 2005.
Mr. Newall is an Officer of the Order of Canada.
Director since: 1997
gOrdOn ritChie
Chairman of Public Affairs, Hill & Knowlton Canada (Government
and public relations company)
Mr. Ritchie, 64, is also Chief Executive Officer of Strategico Inc.
and has been a director of a number of leading Canadian
corporations. Mr. Ritchie had 22 years of distinguished public
service. As Ambassador for Trade Negotiations, Mr. Ritchie was
one of the principal architects of the Canada/United States Free
Trade Agreement.
Director since: 1995
rObert t. stewart
Corporate Director
Mr. Stewart, 75, was a director of a number of large North
American companies in various industries. Mr. Stewart had
a 40-year career with Scott Paper Limited, retiring in 1995
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Director since: 1995
Note: Ages of the Board of Directors provided as at March 2008.
2007 a nnua l report
71
Senior Management and Officers
eXecutive council
(Includes members of the Corporate Council
and Senior Operating Management as follows)
maryanne Chantler
Vice-President, Purchasing and Supply Chain
kevin p. gOlding
President, Rothsay
peter g. mayCOCk
Managing Director, Maple Leaf Bakery U.K.
rOry a. mCalpine
Vice-President, Government and Industry Relations
C. barry mClean
President, Canada Bread Fresh Bakery
réal menard
President, Canada Bread Frozen Bakery
bruCe y. miyashita
Vice-President, Six Sigma
patriCk a. ressa
Chief Information Officer
peter C. smith
Vice-President, Corporate Engineering
riChard yOung
President, Maple Leaf Consumer Foods
other corporate oFFicers
j. niChOlas bOland
Vice-President, Finance Projects
natalie m. marChe
Vice-President and Treasurer
debOrah k. simpsOn
Vice-President, Finance
dianne singer
Assistant Corporate Secretary
committees oF the Board oF directors
audit COmmittee
D.E. McGarry, Chair
R.W. Hiller
J.F. Hankinson
D.E. Loadman
R.T. Stewart
COrpOrate gOvernanCe COmmittee
J.F. Hankinson, Chairman
P. Crawford
C.M. Hosek
D.E. McGarry
G. Ritchie
envirOnment, health and safety COmmittee
J. Gandz, Chairman
R.W. Hiller
C.M. Hosek
D.E. Loadman
J.E. Newall
human resOurCes and COmpensatiOn COmmittee
G. Ritchie, Chairman
P. Crawford
J. Gandz
J.E. Newall
R.T. Stewart
corporate council
g. wallaCe f. mCCain
Chairman
miChael h. mCCain
President and Chief Executive Officer
j. sCOtt mCCain
President and Chief Operating Officer, Agribusiness Group
riChard a. lan
Chief Operating Officer, Food Group
miChael h. vels
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
dOuglas w. dOdds
Chief Strategy Officer
wayne jOhnsOn
Senior Vice-President and Chief Human Resources Officer
rOCCO CappuCCitti
Senior Vice-President, Transactions & Administration
and Corporate Secretary
lynda j. kuhn
Senior Vice-President, Communications & Consumer Affairs
72
m a ple lea F Foods
Corporate Information
capItal stocK
The Company’s authorized capital consists of an unlimited
number of voting common and an unlimited number of non-voting
common shares. At December 31, 2007, 107,600,271 voting shares
and 22,000,000 non-voting shares were issued and outstanding,
for a total of 129,600,271 outstanding shares. There were
821 shareholders of record of which 786 were registered
in Canada, holding 98.6% of the issued voting shares. All of the
issued non-voting shares are held by Ontario Teachers’ Pension
Plan Board. These non-voting shares may be converted into
voting shares at any time.
sHaReHoldeR InQUIRIes
Inquiries regarding dividends, change of address, transfer
requirements or lost certificates should be directed to the
Company’s transfer agent:
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1
Tel: (514) 982-7555
or 1-800-564-6253 (toll-free North America)
or service@computershare.com
oWneRsHIp
The Company’s major shareholders are McCain Capital Corporation
holding 41,518,153 voting shares representing 32% of the total
issued and outstanding shares and Ontario Teachers’ Pension
Plan Board holding 20,728,371 voting shares and 22,000,000
non-voting shares representing 32.96% of the total issued and
outstanding shares. The remainder of the issued and outstanding
shares are publicly held.
coMpanY InfoRMatIon
For public and investment analysis inquiries, please contact
our Senior Vice-President, Communications & Consumer Affairs
at (416) 926-2000.
For copies of annual and quarterly reports, annual information
form and other disclosure documents, please contact our Senior
Vice-President, Transactions & Administration and Corporate
Secretary at (416) 926-2000.
coRpoRate offIce
Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
30 St. Clair Avenue West
Suite 1500
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4V 3A2
Tel: (416) 926-2000
Fax: (416) 926-2018
Website: www.mapleleaf.com
annUal MeetInG
The annual meeting of shareholders of Maple Leaf Foods Inc. will
be held on Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. at the Glenn Gould
Studio, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation building, 250 Front
Street West, Toronto, Canada.
dIVIdends
The declaration and payment of quarterly dividends are made
at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Anticipated payment
dates in 2008: March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31.
tRansfeR aGent and ReGIstRaR
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1
Tel: (514) 982-7555
or 1-800-564-6253 (toll-free North America)
or service@computershare.com
aUdItoRs
KPMG llp
Toronto, Ontario
stocK eXcHanGe lIstInGs and stocK sYMBol
The Company’s voting common shares are listed on The Toronto
Stock Exchange and trade under the symbol “MFI”.
RappoRt annUel
Si vous désirez recevoir un exemplaire de la version française
de ce rapport, veuillez écrire à l’adresse suivante : Secrétaire
de la société, Les Aliments Maple Leaf Inc., 30 St. Clair Avenue
West, Toronto, Ontario M4V 3A2.
The Main Course
at Maple leaf, we are pursuing a new vision to become
a globally admired meat, meals and bakery company.
We have a recipe for success. It involves building on
our core strengths in brand marketing, consumer insights
and innovation, backed up by world-class plants and
distribution capabilities.
our current focus is on completing the execution of our
plan, and delivering step-change growth in profitability.
Supported by the passion of 23,000 global employees
who share our vision, we are well on our way.
contents
1. Financial Highlights 2. Transforming Our Company 4. Segmented Operating Results
5. Letter from the Chairman 6. Message to Shareholders 18. Financial Statements
M
a
p
l
e
l
e
a
f
f
o
o
d
s
I
n
c
.
a
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
0
7
Recipe for Success
Maple leaf foods I nc.
Maple leaf foods Inc.
30 St. Clair avenue West, Suite 1500
toronto, ontario, Canada M4V 3a2
www.mapleleaf.com
p
r
i
n
t
e
d
i
n
C
a
n
a
d
a
annual report 2007