Medexus Pharmaceuticals Annual Report 2017

FY2017 Annual Report · Medexus Pharmaceuticals

Loading PDF…

Our Mission
We are Meredith Corporation, a publicly held media and marketing company founded upon service to
our customers and committed to building value for our shareholders.

Our cornerstone is a commitment to service journalism. From that, we have built businesses that serve
well-defined readers and viewers, deliver the messages of advertisers and extend our brand franchises
and expertise to related markets.

Our products and services distinguish themselves on the basis of quality, customer service and value
that can be trusted.

M
e
r
e
d
i
t
h
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

2
0
1
7
A
n
n
u
a

R
e
p
o
r
t

2017 Annual Report

Financial Highlights

Years Ended June 30 (In millions except per share data)

GAAP Results

Revenues

Income from operations

Net earnings

Earnings per share

Total assets

Total debt

Non-GAAP Results

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

1,713 $

1,650 $

1,594 $

1,469 $

1,471

309

189

4.16

131

0.75

242

137

3.02

187

114

2.50

2,730

2,627

2,843

2,544

701

695

795

715

211

124

2.74

2,140

350

Adjusted earnings per share (1)

4.00 $

3.30 $

2.80 $

2.91

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

369

351

300

246

256

Revenue
5-Year CAGR: 4%

Dividend Per Share(3)
5-Year CAGR: 7%

$2,000

$1,713

$2.50

$1,650

$1,594

1,500

$1,471

$1,469

$2.08

$1.98

$2.00

$1.83

$1.73

$1.63

1,000

500

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

$ in millions

1.50

1.00

0.50

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Non-GAAP amounts are not in accordance with GAAP (accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America). While management believes
these measures contribute to an understanding of the Company’s financial performance, they should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures
of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in the Appendix immediately following the included
Form 10-K.

(1) From continuing operations adjusted for special charges recorded in all fiscal years.
(2) Adjusted EBITDA – Earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets.
(3) Annualized dividend per share at end of fiscal year

Corporate Information

MEREDITH CORPORATION
Meredith Corporation (NYSE: MDP; meredith.com)
has been committed to service journalism for more
than 115 years. Today, Meredith uses multiple
distribution platforms – including broadcast television,
print, digital, mobile and video – to provide consumers
with content they desire and to deliver the messages
of its advertising and marketing partners.

ANNUAL MEETING
Holders of Meredith Corporation stock are invited to
attend the annual meeting of shareholders at 10 a.m.
Central Standard Time on November 8, 2017, at the
Company’s principal office, 1716 Locust Street,
Des Moines, IA.

STOCK EXCHANGE
Meredith Corporation Common stock is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange. The exchange symbol for
Meredith is MDP. CUSIP Number: 589433101. Meredith
Corporation Class B stock (issued as a dividend
on common stock in December 1986) is not listed.
The transfer of Class B stock is limited to the lineal
descendants of original owners, their spouses, or trusts/
family partnerships for the benefit of those persons.
Requests for transfer to any other person or entity
will require a share-for-share conversion to common
stock. Conversion prior to sale is recommended. CUSIP
Number: 589433200. The Company’s chairman and chief
executive officer has certified to the New York Stock
Exchange that he is not aware of any violation by the
Company of the New York Stock Exchange Corporate
Governance Listing Standards. The most recently
required certification was submitted to the exchange on
December 8, 2016.

REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., PO Box 64854, St. Paul, MN
55164-0854 or 1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101,
Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100, 800-468-9716 or
651-450-4064, email: stocktransfer@wellsfargo.com

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT
Meredith Corporation offers a dividend reinvestment
plan that automatically reinvests shareholder dividends
for the purchase of additional shares of stock. To obtain
more information or to join the plan, contact Wells Fargo
at 800-468-9716 or write to the preceding addresses.

FORM 10-K
A copy of the Meredith Corporation Fiscal 2017 Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) is included in this report and available
at meredith.com. Additional copies are available without
charge to shareholders by calling 515-284-3000. The
Company has filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K the certification of its chief executive officer
and chief financial officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

QUARTERLY INFORMATION
To receive copies of Meredith Corporation quarterly SEC
filings, earnings releases and dividend releases, please
visit meredith.com, or call 515-284-3000.

INVESTOR CONTACT
Meredith Corporation Investor Relations,
1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50309-3023,
515-284-3000, Meredith.com,
investor.relations@meredith.com

NATIONAL MEDIA

LOCAL MEDIA

Atlanta

Phoenix

St. Louis

Portland

Nashville

Hartford - New Haven

Kansas City

Greenville - Asheville

Las Vegas

Mobile - Pensacola

M O BI L E P E N S AC O LA

Flint - Saginaw

Springfield - Holyoke

To Our Shareholders

On behalf of Meredith Corporation and our more
than 3,500 employees, we want to thank you for your
investment in our Company. As a shareholder, you’ve
entrusted us with your financial resources. We take
that responsibility very seriously.

We continued to aggressively execute our multi-
platform growth strategies, delivering record revenue
and profit in fiscal 2017. Revenues grew 4 percent to
$1.71 billion. Earnings per share (EPS) were $4.16,
compared to $0.75 in the prior year. Excluding special
items in both years, EPS grew 20 percent to an all-time
high of $4.00.

We delivered strong results across the entire Company.
Two aspects of our performance stood out in particular:

We delivered record digital performance as total
Company digital advertising revenue grew by more
than 20 percent. In our National Media Group,
we reached an important milestone as digital
advertising growth offset print advertising declines
for comparable titles. Our digital business continues
to be highly profitable and contributes to Meredith
shareholder value.

We generated record political advertising revenue of
$63 million in our Local Media Group, an increase of
nearly 45 percent over the fiscal 2015 political cycle.
Political advertising was particularly strong at our
stations in Las Vegas, St. Louis, Phoenix, Kansas City
and Atlanta.

Stepping back to look at our fiscal 2017 performance as
a whole, we continued to execute a strategic plan that
strengthens our connection with consumers, delivers
value to our advertising and marketing clients, and
yields a superior return for our shareholders.

First, we continued to grow our already
powerful consumer connection across
Meredith’s media platforms:

Our television stations ranked No. 1 or No. 2 in
morning or late news viewership in 10 of our 12
markets, according to May 2017 Nielsen data.

Readership across our magazine portfolio was more
than 105 million adults, according to the Spring 2017
GfK Mediamark Research & Intelligence Report.

STRONG DIGITAL METRICS

31%

23%

15%

2011

2013

2015

2017

National Media Group digital advertising as a percent
of total advertising revenues continues to grow
strongly, reaching 31 percent in fiscal 2017, up from
8 percent in fiscal 2011.

Importantly, growth in digital advertising revenues
offset print advertising declines and drove gains
in total National Media Group advertising for
comparable brands.

In our Local Media Group, digital advertising grew
17 percent, and we’ve doubled digital advertising
revenues in the last four years with room for continued
strong growth.

Traffic to our digital sites averaged 86 million
monthly unique visitors, according to comScore,
representing an 8 percent increase over the prior year.

Our reach to young women stood at more than 70
percent of U.S. female Millennials.

Additionally, Meredith’s database of 125 million
individuals now represents 80 percent of U.S.
homeowners. It is a key part of our ability to
successfully segment and target consumer audiences
with relevant editorial along with messages from our
advertising and marketing clients.

Meredith Corporation 2017 Annual Report | 1

RECORD LOCAL MEDIA RESULTS

Total Operating Profit
Dollars in millions

$215

$163

$124

$88

2011

2013

2015

2017

Our Local Media Group delivered all-time highs in
revenue and profit in fiscal 2017, fueled by higher
political and digital advertising revenues and growing
retransmission fees. Record political advertising
revenues of $63 million were driven primarily by
competitive races in Las Vegas, St. Louis, Phoenix,
Kansas City and Atlanta.

fiscal 2021. We also extended our FOX affiliations
in Portland, Las Vegas, Greenville, Mobile and
Springfield into fiscal 2019.

In our National Media Group, we renewed our
licensing program with Walmart. This program
features more than 3,000 SKUs of Better Homes
& Gardens-branded products available at 5,000
Walmart stores and on Walmart.com. In addition,
we launched new licensing programs based on other
Meredith’s brands, including a very well-received
line of EatingWell-branded frozen entrées, and an
array of SHAPE-branded fitness apparel.

Finally, we continued to execute our Total
Shareholder Return strategy:

Our strategy is anchored by the very consistent and
strong cash flows generated by our portfolio of media
assets. Cash flow from operations was $219 million
in fiscal 2017. We grew our dividend by 5 percent
to $2.08 per share on an annualized basis, the 24th
consecutive year of dividend growth. We have grown
our dividend at an average annual rate of 6 percent
since launching our Total Shareholder Return strategy
with a 50 percent increase in fiscal 2012. Fiscal 2017
Total Shareholder Return was 18 percent.

Second, we took steps to expand our
media portfolio:

In our Local Media Group, we acquired the
broadcast assets of WPCH in Atlanta from Turner
Broadcasting, strengthening our position in one of
the nation’s largest television markets. We also added
newscasts in several markets, further increasing our
competitive position.

In our National Media Group, we launched The
Magnolia Journal, an extension of Joanna and Chip
Gaines’ popular Magnolia brand. It quickly became
the strongest-selling newsstand title in Meredith’s
recent history, and we are currently selling more than
1 million copies of each issue.

Third, we successfully renewed several key
revenue-generating agreements:

Our Plans for Fiscal 2018

As we look to fiscal 2018, we will continue to
aggressively pursue strategic growth initiatives that
have established Meredith as a leader in the media
and marketing industry, and have driven higher
shareholder value over time.

In our Local Media Group these
initiatives include:

First, continuing to strengthen and expand our
local broadcast programming and converting
audience gains into higher advertising revenue.

Second, monetizing our fast-growing local media
digital platforms. We’ve doubled digital advertising
revenues in our Local Media Group in the last four
years, and we have room for continued strong growth.

In our Local Media Group, we renewed our CBS
affiliation agreements for stations in Atlanta,
Phoenix, Kansas City and Flint/Saginaw into

And third, renegotiating retransmission
agreements with cable, satellite and telecom
providers to increase revenue over time.

2 | Meredith Corporation 2017 Annual Report

In our National Media Group these
initiatives include:

MEDIA PORTFOLIO EXPANSION

First, continuing to create vibrant and relevant
content and growing our reach to Millennials,
many of whom are getting married, starting families
and buying homes – the life stages that are right
in our wheelhouse.

Second, growing total advertising revenues and
increasing our market share. In print, our competitive
set advertising market share is at an all-time high
of 41 percent. Our digital growth strategy focuses
on delivering premium branded content; growing
our audience and strengthening its engagement;
accumulating rich and differentiated first-party data;
and using advertising technology to put the right
message in front of the right consumer at the right
time. This strategy results in a better experience for
our consumers and strong returns for our advertising
and marketing clients – which allows us to charge
premium rates.

And third, generating more profit from consumers.
This includes maximizing our highly profitable
circulation activities; growing our industry-leading
brand licensing business; and ramping up our
eCommerce initiatives.

Our Long-Term Vision

We will continue to focus on producing consistently
strong results, driven by:

A great portfolio of media assets that deliver
consistent and growing cash flows.

A balanced capital allocation strategy that
re-invests approximately half of cash generated
into our business and returns the other half to our
shareholders. Our goal is to deliver top-third Total
Shareholder Return.

Our track record as an industry consolidator. We
are constantly evaluating strategic acquisitions
across our media portfolio.

A strong and proven management team that
consistently delivers results.

We expanded our magazine portfolio with the addition
of The Magnolia Journal, a quarterly lifestyle magazine
based on Joanna and Chip Gaines’ popular Magnolia
brand. The title quickly became Meredith’s strongest-
selling launch in recent history, and one of the industry’s
most successful debuts. It is selling more than 1 million
copies each issue through both subscriptions and at
the newsstand.

dedicated support groups, and committed management
team. Our workforce is the best in the media industry,
underscored by our 115-year track record of success.

In closing, we continue to be highly confident in
the strength and resilience of Meredith’s diversified
business model. We have proven adept at developing
our existing brands and profitably integrating
acquired properties. We have a long history of prudent
capital stewardship and an ongoing commitment to
maximizing Total Shareholder Return.

It is our mission and pledge to protect and grow the
value of your investment in Meredith over time.

Our talented and creative employees play a vital role in
Meredith’s success. They include our inventive editorial
teams, innovative sales and marketing professionals,

Stephen M. Lacy
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

Mell Meredith Frazier
Vice Chairman

Meredith Corporation 2017 Annual Report | 3

Board of Directors

Donald A. Baer 1, 2
Mr. Baer, 62, a director since
2014, is worldwide chair and
chief executive officer of Burson-
Marsteller, a member of WPP PLC,
one of the world’s largest strategic
communications businesses.

Donald C. Berg 1, 2
Mr. Berg, 63, a director since
2012, is the president of DCB
Advisory Services, which provides
consulting services to food and
beverage companies.

Mell Meredith Frazier 3, 4
Ms. Frazier, 61, a director since
2000, is vice chairman of Meredith
Corporation and chairman of the
Meredith Corporation Foundation.

Thomas H. Harty
Mr. Harty, 54, a newly elected
director, is president and chief
operating officer of Meredith
Corporation.

Frederick B. Henry 3, 4
Mr. Henry, 71, a director
since 1969, is president of
The Bohen Foundation, a
private charitable foundation.

Joel W. Johnson 2, 3
Mr. Johnson, 74, a director
since 1994, is the retired
chairman and chief executive
officer of Hormel Foods Corporation,
a leading producer of meat and
other products.

Beth J. Kaplan 1, 2
Ms. Kaplan, 59, a newly elected
director, is the managing member
of Axcel Partners, LLC, investing
in consumer-facing early-stage
and growth companies founded
and led by women.

Stephen M. Lacy
Mr. Lacy, 63, a director since 2004,
is chairman and chief executive
officer of Meredith Corporation.

Officers
Stephen M. Lacy
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thomas H. Harty
President and Chief Operating Officer

Paul A. Karpowicz
President, Local Media Group

Jonathan B. Werther
President, National Media Group

Joseph H. Ceryanec
Chief Financial Officer

John S. Zieser
Chief Development Officer
and General Counsel

Steven M. Cappaert
Corporate Controller

Committee Assignments
1 Audit 2 Finance 3 Nominating/Governance 4 Compensation

Philip A. Marineau 1, 4
Mr. Marineau, 70, a director since
1998, is a partner at LNK Partners, a
private equity firm.

Elizabeth E. Tallett 3, 4
Ms. Tallett, 68, a director since
2008, is a consultant to early
stage pharmaceutical and
healthcare companies.

OUR COMMITMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENT

As a leading media and marketing communications company, Meredith serves millions of
consumers who come to our brands for timeless advice about food, decorating, building,
parenting, gardening, beauty, crafts, health and well-being – and more. We realize that
to take care of our homes and families, we must take care of the planet. Meredith has in
place a number of sustainable business practices, as well as a network of environmental
sustainability ambassadors whose goal is to recommend ongoing changes that will enable
us to be an even more responsible member of the global community. To see our progress,
please visit our corporate social responsibility report at Meredith.com.

4 | Meredith Corporation 2017 Annual Report

2017
Form 10-K

MEREDITH CORPORATION

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017

Commission file number 1-5128

MEREDITH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Iowa
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

42-0410230
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa
(Address of principal executive offices)

50309-3023
(ZIP Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (515) 284-3000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $1

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of class
Class B Common Stock, par value $1

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or
an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and emerging growth
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any
new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The registrant estimates that the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant at
December 31, 2016, was approximately $2.2 billion based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange at that date.

Shares of stock outstanding at July 31, 2017
Common shares..............................................
Class B shares ................................................
Total common and Class B shares .................

39,475,889
5,119,163
44,595,052

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
November 8, 2017, are incorporated by reference in Part III to the extent described therein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I
Business..................................................................................................................
Description of Business
Local Media.......................................................................................................
National Media..................................................................................................
Executive Officers of the Company .......................................................................
Employees ..............................................................................................................
Other.......................................................................................................................
Available Information.............................................................................................
Forward Looking Statements .................................................................................
Risk Factors............................................................................................................
Unresolved Staff Comments ..................................................................................
Properties................................................................................................................
Legal Proceedings ..................................................................................................
Mine Safety Disclosures.........................................................................................

Part II

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities................................................................
Selected Financial Data..........................................................................................
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations ........................................................................................
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ...............................
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data......................................................
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure..........................................................................................
Controls and Procedures.........................................................................................
Other Information...................................................................................................

Part III
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance....................................
Executive Compensation........................................................................................
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters .............................................................................
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence........
Principal Accounting Fees and Services ................................................................

Part IV
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules ...............................................................

Item 1.

Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

Item 5.

Item 6.
Item 7.

Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.

Item 9A.
Item 9B.

Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.

Item 13.
Item 14.

Item 15.

Signatures.......................................................................................................................................

Page

3
7
10
10
10
10
11
11
14
14
14
15

15
17

18
38
40

90
90
91

91
92

92
92
92

Meredith Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
(Form 10-K) as Meredith, the Company, we, our, and us.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Meredith Corporation has been committed to service journalism for 115 years. Meredith began in 1902 as an
agricultural publisher. In 1924, the Company published the first issue of Better Homes & Gardens. The Company
entered the television broadcasting business in 1948. Today, Meredith uses multiple media platforms—including
broadcast television, print, digital, mobile, and video—to provide consumers with content they desire and to deliver
the messages of our advertising and marketing partners. The Company is incorporated under the laws of the State of
Iowa. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol MDP.

The Company operates two business segments: local media and national media. Our local media segment consists
of 17 television stations located across the United States (U.S.) concentrated in fast growing markets with related
digital and mobile media assets. The television stations include seven CBS affiliates, five FOX affiliates, two
MyNetworkTV affiliates, one NBC affiliate, one ABC affiliate, and two independent stations. Local media's digital
presence includes 12 websites, 12 mobile-optimized websites, and approximately 30 applications (apps) focused on
news, sports, and weather-related information.

Our national media segment includes leading national consumer media brands delivered via multiple media
platforms including print magazines and digital and mobile media, brand licensing activities, database-related
activities, and business-to-business marketing products and services. It focuses on the food, home, parenting, and
lifestyle markets and is a leading publisher of magazines serving women. In fiscal 2017, we published in print more
than 20 subscription magazines, including Better Homes & Gardens, Shape, Parents, Family Circle, Martha
Stewart Living, Rachael Ray Every Day, FamilyFun, and Allrecipes, and nearly 140 special interest publications.
Most of our brands are also available as digital editions on one or more of the major digital newsstands and on
major tablet devices. The national media segment's extensive digital presence consists of more than 50 websites,
nearly 50 mobile-optimized websites, and nearly 20 apps. The national media segment also includes digital and
customer relationship marketing, which provides specialized marketing products and services to some of America's
leading companies; a large consumer database; brand licensing activities; and other related operations.

Financial information about industry segments can be found in Item 7-Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data under
Note 15.

The Company's largest revenue source is advertising. National and local economic conditions affect the magnitude
of our advertising revenues. Both local media and national media revenues and operating results can be affected by
changes in the demand for advertising and consumer demand for our products. Television advertising is seasonal
and cyclical to some extent, traditionally generating higher revenues in the second and fourth fiscal quarters and
during key political contests and major sporting events. Magazine circulation revenues are generally affected by
national and regional economic conditions and competition from other forms of media.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS

During fiscal 2017, Meredith renewed its licensing program with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Walmart). This program
features more than 3,000 SKUs of Better Homes & Gardens branded products at 5,000 Walmart stores and on
walmart.com. In addition, in September 2016, EatingWell-branded frozen entrées were launched through a variety
of regional and national grocers. Due to the strong consumer demand for these products, additional distribution will
be added in the second half of calendar 2017.

During fiscal 2017, Meredith continued to expand our reach to the consumer through magazine brand launches. In
July 2016, Meredith announced a partnership with Joanna and Chip Gaines, owners of the successful Magnolia
brand, to launch the Magnolia Journal, a quarterly lifestyle magazine. Due to strong demand, two weeks after its
newsstand debut in October 2016, Meredith went back to press to increase the distribution from 400 thousand to
600 thousand. The title quickly became Meredith's strongest-selling launch in recent history, and is on track to
become the most profitable title in the first year of operation in Meredith history. The title is now selling more than
900,000 copies each issue through both paid subscriptions and at newsstand. In addition to the Magnolia Journal
launch, Meredith released a bookazine based on the House & Garden brand and a newsstand magazine based on the
Forks Over Knives brand.

In fiscal 2017, Meredith debuted redesigns of our two largest subscription magazines. The September 2016 issue of
Family Circle introduced a new logo with refreshed layouts, fonts, and bolder photography. This redesign allows
easier navigation with more entry points, quick takeaways, and engaging story formats. The January 2017 issue of
Better Homes & Gardens revealed a new logo. The new logo provides equal balance to both components and
creates a cohesive brand identity across multiple platforms.

In April 2017, Meredith acquired WPCH-TV (Peachtree TV), an independent station in Atlanta, Georgia. Prior to its
acquisition, Meredith had managed the day-to-day operations of Peachtree TV, including advertising sales,
marketing and promotions, and technical operations. This acquisition created Meredith's fifth owned-and-operated
duopoly market, as Meredith also owns WGCL, the CBS affiliate in Atlanta.

In May 2017, Meredith, in partnership with Andrews McMeel Universal, launched the Posh Coloring Studio, the
first on-demand, all-access, coloring club for adults. The Posh Coloring Studio is a membership program that
provides members with continuously added designs from top coloring creators, exclusive editorial features, and
social community connection with other Posh Coloring Studio members.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Local Media

Local media contributed 37 percent of Meredith's consolidated revenues and 59 percent of the combined operating
profit from local media and national media operations in fiscal 2017. Information about the Company's television
stations at June 30, 2017, follows:

Station,
Market

WGCL-TV
Atlanta, GA

WPCH-TV
Atlanta, GA

KPHO-TV
Phoenix, AZ

KTVK
Phoenix, AZ

KMOV
St. Louis, MO

KPTV
Portland, OR

KPDX
Portland, OR

WSMV-TV
Nashville, TN

WFSB
Hartford, CT
New Haven, CT

KCTV
Kansas City, MO

KSMO-TV
Kansas City, MO

WHNS
Greenville, SC
Spartanburg, SC
Asheville, NC
Anderson, SC

KVVU-TV
Las Vegas, NV

DMA
National
Rank 1

Network
Affiliation

Expiration
Date of Network
Affiliation

Virtual
Channel

Expiration
Date of FCC
License

Average
Audience
Share 2

CBS

August 2020

Independent

n/a

CBS

August 2020

Independent

n/a

CBS

June 2020

FOX

December 2018

MyNetworkTV

September 2018

NBC

December 2017

CBS

June 2020

CBS

August 2020

MyNetworkTV

September 2018

FOX

December 2018

April 2021

3.8 %

April 2021

2.0 %

October 2022

6.3 %

October 2022

3.8 %

February 2022

10.4 %

February 2023

5.3 %

February 2023

1.7 %

August 2021

7.1 %

April 2023

11.3 %

February 2022

9.0 %

February 2022

0.8 %

December 2020

3.6 %

FOX

December 2018

October 2022

4.8 %

DMA
National
Rank 1

Network
Affiliation

Expiration
Date of Network
Affiliation

Virtual
Channel

Expiration
Date of FCC
License

Average
Audience
Share 2

114

FOX

December 2018

April 2021

6.5 %

CBS

August 2020

October 2021

13.2 %

ABC
FOX

December 2019
December 2018

40
40.2

April 2023

8.9 %
3.8 %

114

CBS

June 2020

April 2023

7.1 %

Station,
Market

WALA-TV
Mobile, AL
Pensacola, FL

WNEM-TV
Flint, MI
Saginaw, MI
Bay City, MI

WGGB-TV
Springfield, MA
Holyoke, MA

WSHM-LD
Springfield, MA
Holyoke, MA

n/a - Not applicable
1 Designated Market Area (DMA) is a registered trademark of, and is defined by, Nielsen Media Research. The national rank is
from the 2016-2017 DMA ranking.

2 Average audience share represents the estimated percentage of households using television tuned to the station in the DMA.
The percentages shown reflect the average total day shares (6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.) for the November 2016, February 2017,
and May 2017 measurement periods.

Operations
The principal sources of the local media segment's revenues are: 1) local non-political advertising focusing on the
immediate geographic area of the stations; 2) retransmission of our television signals by cable, satellite, and
telecommunications service providers; 3) national non-political advertising; 4) political advertising which is
cyclical with peaks occurring in our odd fiscal years (e.g., fiscal 2015, fiscal 2017) and particularly in our second
fiscal quarter of those fiscal years; and 5) digital advertising on the stations' websites, mobile-optimized websites,
and apps.

The stations sell commercial time to both local/regional and national advertisers. Rates for spot advertising are
influenced primarily by the market size, number of media competitors, including in-market broadcasters, and
audience ratings and demographics. The larger a station's audience in any particular daypart, the more leverage a
station has in negotiating advertising rates. Generally, as supply and demand fluctuate in the market, so do a
station's advertising rates. Most national advertising is sold by an independent representative firm. The sales staff at
each station generates local/regional advertising revenues.

Typically 40 to 50 percent of a market's television advertising revenue is generated during local newscasts. Stations
are continually working to grow their news ratings, which in turn increase advertising revenues.

Meredith's 16 national network affiliations at our television stations also influence advertising rates. Generally, a
network affiliation agreement provides a station the exclusive right to broadcast network programming in its local
service area. In return, the network has the right to sell most of the commercial advertising aired during network
programs.

Programming fees paid to the networks are in essence a portion of the retransmission consent fees that Meredith
receives from cable, satellite, and telecommunications service providers, which pay Meredith to carry our television
programming in our markets. In addition to increases in fiscal 2016, programming fees paid to the networks
increased significantly in fiscal 2017.

Stations generally also pay networks for certain programming and services such as marquee sports (professional
football, college basketball, and Olympics) and news services. Most of the Company's FOX affiliates also pay the
FOX network for additional advertising spots during prime-time programming. While Meredith's relations with the
networks historically have been very good, the Company can make no assurances they will remain so over time.

Retransmission consent revenue is generated from cable, satellite, and telecommunications service providers who
pay Meredith for access to our television station signals so that they may retransmit our signals and charge their
subscribers for this programming. These fees increased in fiscal 2017 primarily due to renegotiations of expiring
contracts and negotiated contract step-ups on existing contracts effective during the year.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has permitted broadcast television station licensees to use their
digital spectrum for a wide variety of services such as high-definition television programming, audio, data, mobile
applications, and other types of communication, subject to the requirement that each broadcaster provide at least
one free video channel equal in quality to the current technical standards. Several of our stations are broadcasting
one or more additional programming streams on their digital channel. Examples include: two of our markets have
MyNetworkTV, three air the LAFF network, eight carry COZI TV network, and six broadcast Escape network.

The costs of television programming are significant. In addition to network affiliation fees, there are two principal
programming costs for Meredith: locally produced programming, including local news, and purchased syndicated
programming. The Company continues to increase our locally produced news and entertainment programming to
control content and costs and to attract advertisers. Syndicated programming costs are based largely on demand
from stations in the market and can fluctuate significantly.

Competition
Meredith's television stations compete directly for advertising dollars and programming in their respective markets
with other local television stations, radio stations, cable television providers, and competitors' websites and mobile-
optimized websites. Other mass media providers such as newspapers and their related websites and apps, are also
competitors. Advertisers compare market share, audience demographics, and advertising rates, and take into
account audience acceptance of a station's programming, whether local, network, or syndicated.

Regulation
The ownership, operation, and sale of broadcast television stations, including those licensed to the Company, are
subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC, which engages in extensive regulation of the broadcasting industry under
authority granted by the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act), including authority to
promulgate rules and regulations governing broadcasting. The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve
the public interest. Among other things, the FCC assigns frequency bands; determines stations' locations and
operating parameters; issues, renews, revokes, and modifies station licenses; regulates and limits changes in
ownership or control of station licenses; regulates equipment used by stations; regulates station employment
practices; regulates certain program content, including commercial matters in children's programming; has the
authority to impose penalties for violations of its rules or the Communications Act; and imposes annual fees on
stations. Reference should be made to the Communications Act, as well as to the FCC's rules, public notices, and
rulings for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of broadcast stations.

Broadcast licenses are granted for eight-year periods. The Communications Act directs the FCC to renew a
broadcast license if the station has served the public interest and is in substantial compliance with the provisions of
the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies. Management believes the Company is in substantial
compliance with all applicable provisions of the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies and knows of no
reason why Meredith's broadcast station licenses will not be renewed.

The FCC has, on occasion, changed the rules related to ownership of media assets, including rules relating to the
ownership of one or more television stations in a market. The FCC's media ownership rules are subject to further
review by the FCC, various court appeals, petitions for reconsideration before the FCC, and possible actions by
Congress. We cannot predict the impact of any of these developments on our business.

The Communications Act and the FCC also regulate relationships between television broadcasters and cable,
satellite, and telecommunications television providers. Under these provisions, most cable systems must devote a
specified portion of their channel capacity to the carriage of the signals of local television stations that elect to
exercise this right to mandatory carriage. Alternatively, television stations may elect to restrict cable systems from
carrying their signals without their written permission, referred to as retransmission consent. Congress and the FCC
have established and implemented generally similar market-specific requirements for mandatory carriage of local
television stations by satellite television providers when those providers choose to provide a market's local
television signals. These rules, including related rules on exclusivity, good faith bargaining, and "over-the-top"
carriage are subject to further review by the FCC and possible actions by Congress. We cannot predict the impact of
any of these developments on our business.

The FCC proposed a plan, called the National Broadband Plan, to increase the amount of spectrum available in the
U.S. for wireless broadband use. In furtherance of the National Broadband Plan, Congress enacted, and the
President signed into law, legislation authorizing the FCC to conduct a “reverse auction” for which television
broadcast licensees could submit bids to receive compensation in return for relinquishing all or a portion of their
rights in the television spectrum of their full service and/or Class A stations. Under the new law, the FCC may hold
one reverse auction and a follow-up auction for the newly freed spectrum. The FCC completed both auctions earlier
in calendar 2017.

Even if a television licensee did not participate in the reverse auction, the results of the auction could materially
impact a station's operations. The FCC has the authority to force a television station to change channels and/or
modify its coverage area to allow the FCC to rededicate certain channels within the television band for wireless
broadband use. Earlier this calendar year, the FCC released a list of television stations that must change their
facilities as part of this "repacking" process. Several of our stations are among the hundreds of stations selected for
repacking of the television band. The repacking process will be ongoing for several years and may change. The
FCC will reimburse us for certain repacking expenses subject to an overall $1.75 billion industry cap on the
reimbursed expenses of all repacked television stations. We cannot predict whether or how this process will
ultimately affect the Company or our television stations.

In addition to the National Broadband Plan, Congress, and the FCC have under consideration, and in the future may
adopt, new laws, regulations, and policies regarding a wide variety of other matters that also could affect, directly or
indirectly, the operation, ownership transferability, and profitability of the Company's broadcast stations and affect
the ability of the Company to acquire additional stations. In addition to the matters noted above, these could include
spectrum usage fees, regulation of political advertising rates, restrictions on the advertising of certain products
(such as alcoholic beverages), program content restrictions, and ownership rule changes.

Other matters that could potentially affect the Company's broadcast properties include technological innovations
and developments generally affecting competition in the mass communications industry for viewers or advertisers,
such as home video recording devices and players, satellite radio and television services, cable television systems,
newspapers, outdoor advertising, and internet-delivered video programming services. For example, the FCC is
currently considering a proposal to allow the voluntary transition of television broadcasters to ATSC 3.0, known as
Next Generation Television. We cannot predict whether or how this process will ultimately affect the Company or
our television stations.

The information provided in this section is not intended to be inclusive of all regulatory provisions currently in
effect. Statutory provisions and FCC regulations are subject to change, and any such changes could affect future
operations and profitability of the Company's local media segment. Management cannot predict what regulations or
legislation may be adopted, nor can management estimate the effect any such changes would have on the
Company's television broadcasting operations.

National Media

National media contributed 63 percent of Meredith's consolidated revenues and 41 percent of the combined
operating profit from local media and national media operations in fiscal 2017. Better Homes & Gardens, our
flagship brand, continues to account for a significant percentage of revenues and operating profit of the national
media segment and the Company.

Magazines
Information for our major subscription magazine titles as of June 30, 2017, follows:

Title

Description

Frequency
per Year

Year-end
Rate Base 1

Better Homes & Gardens
Family Circle
Shape
Parents
FamilyFun
Martha Stewart Living
Fit Pregnancy and Baby
Rachael Ray Every Day
Allrecipes
EatingWell
Midwest Living
Traditional Home
Successful Farming
Wood

Women's service
Women's service
Women's lifestyle
Parenting
Parenting
Women's service
Parenting
Women's lifestyle and food
Food
Women's lifestyle and food
Travel and lifestyle
Home decorating
Farming business
Woodworking

12
12
10
12
9
10
11
10
6
6
6
8
13
7

7,600,000
4,000,000
2,500,000
2,200,000
2,100,000
2,050,000
2,000,000
1,700,000
1,350,000
1,000,000
950,000
850,000
390,000
340,000

1 Rate base is the circulation guaranteed to advertisers. Actual circulation generally exceeds rate base and for most of the Company's

titles is tracked by the Alliance for Audited Media, which issues periodic statements for audited magazines.

In addition to these major magazine titles, we published nearly 140 special interest publications under
approximately 90 titles in fiscal 2017, primarily under the Better Homes & Gardens brand. The titles are issued
from one to six times annually and sold primarily on newsstands. A limited number of subscriptions are also sold to
certain special interest publications. The following special interest titles were published quarterly or more
frequently: American Patchwork & Quilting; Country Gardens; Diabetic Living; Do It Yourself; Eat This, Not
That!; The Magnolia Journal; and Quilts & More.

Magazine Advertising—Advertising revenues are generated primarily from sales to clients engaged in consumer
marketing. Many of Meredith's larger magazines offer regional and demographic editions that contain similar
editorial content but allow advertisers to customize messages to specific markets or audiences. The Company sells
two primary types of magazine advertising: display and direct-response. Advertisements are either run-of-press
(printed along with the editorial portions of the magazine) or inserts (preprinted pages). Most of the national media
segment's advertising revenues are derived from run-of-press display advertising. Meredith also possesses strategic
marketing capabilities, which provide clients and their agencies with access to all of Meredith’s media platforms
and capabilities, including print, television, digital, video, mobile, consumer events, and custom marketing. Our
team of creative and marketing experts delivers innovative solutions across multiple media channels that meet each
client's unique advertising and promotional requirements.

Magazine Circulation—Subscriptions obtained through direct-mail solicitation, agencies, insert cards, the internet,
and other means are Meredith's largest source of circulation revenues. Revenue per subscription and related
expenses can vary significantly by source. Some subscription sources generate lower revenues than other sources,

but have proportionately lower related costs. The majority of subscription magazines are also sold by single copy.
Single copies sold on newsstands are distributed primarily through magazine wholesalers, who have the right to
receive credit from the Company for magazines returned to them by retailers.

Digital and Mobile Media
We have 21 of our titles available as digital editions, with an audience of approximately 1.2 million. Digital
subscriptions and single copy sales collectively represent 4 percent of our total rate base.

National media's more than 50 websites and nearly 50 mobile-optimized websites provide ideas and inspiration.
These branded websites focus on the topics that women care about most—food, home, entertaining, and meeting
the needs of moms—and on delivering powerful content geared toward lifestyle topics such as health, beauty, style,
and wellness. Our Allrecipes brand alone accounts for 19 web and mobile sites serving 24 countries in 12
languages, one app across multiple platforms, and one Skill for Amazon Alexa. Digital traffic across our various
platforms averaged 77 million unique monthly visitors in fiscal 2017. Our brands have a strong social networking
presence as well. In fiscal 2017, national media reached over 30 million Facebook fans, nearly 13 million Twitter
followers, about 5 million Instagram followers, and nearly 6 million Pinterest followers.

Other Sources of Revenues
Other revenues are derived from digital and customer relationship marketing, other custom publishing projects,
brand licensing agreements, and ancillary products and services.

Meredith Xcelerated Marketing—Meredith Xcelerated Marketing (MXM) is a strategic and creative agency with
digital expertise across multiple channels. MXM provides fully-integrated marketing solutions for some of the
world's top brands, including The Kraft Heinz Co., Benjamin Moore, Allergan, TGIFridays, and WebMD. MXM's
revenue is independent of advertising and circulation, though sometimes its services are sold as part of larger
programs that include advertising components.

Brand Licensing—Meredith owns a portfolio of valuable registered trademarks. Meredith brand licensing
generates royalty revenue through multiple long-term licensing agreements with retailers, manufacturers, and
service providers benefiting through the use of those trademarks. Brand licensing extends the reach of Meredith
brands into additional consumer channels in the U.S. and abroad.

For almost 10 years, Meredith has had a direct-to-retail licensing agreement with Walmart for Better Homes &
Gardens-branded products sold at Walmart stores in the U.S., Walmart.com, and emerging in stores in Mexico and
China. We recently extended our licensing agreement with Walmart through 2019. Meredith also has a long-term
agreement to license the Better Homes & Gardens brand to Realogy Corporation, which continues to build a
residential real estate franchise system as Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate, LLC. The network now includes
more than 300 offices and more than 11,000 agents across the U.S., Canada, and the Bahamas. Other licensing
agreements include Better Homes & Gardens floral arrangements with FTD.com and SHAPE Active, an activewear
collection designed for women.

During fiscal 2017, the EatingWell branded line of healthy frozen food entrées manufactured and distributed by
Bellisio Foods Inc. launched across a variety of regional and national grocers. Due to strong consumer response,
these "Better For You" entrées are expected to continue to gain retail distribution in the second-half of calendar
2017.

Meredith's national media brands are currently distributed in nearly 80 countries, including a localized presence in
more than 30 countries such as Australia, China, India, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey in print and digitally.

The Company continues to pursue activities that will serve consumers and advertisers while also extending and
strengthening the reach and vitality of our brands.

Meredith has licensed exclusive global rights to publish and distribute books based on our consumer-leading
brands, including the powerful Better Homes & Gardens imprint, to a book publisher. Meredith creates book
content and retains all approval and content rights while the publisher is responsible for book layout and design,
printing, sales and marketing, distribution, and inventory management. Meredith receives royalties based on sales
subject to a guaranteed minimum.

Production and Delivery
Paper, printing, and postage costs accounted for 27 percent of the national media segment's fiscal 2017 operating
expenses.

Coated publication paper is the major raw material essential to the national media segment. We directly purchase all
of the paper for our magazine production and custom publishing business. The Company has contractual
agreements with major paper manufacturers to ensure adequate supplies for planned publishing requirements. The
price of paper is driven by overall market conditions and is therefore difficult to predict. In fiscal 2017, average
paper prices decreased 5 percent. They declined 2 percent in fiscal 2016 and 3 percent in fiscal 2015. Management
anticipates paper prices will be stable during fiscal 2018 and that fiscal 2018 average paper prices will be relatively
flat compared to fiscal 2017 given no significant shifts in the current supply and demand structure are anticipated.

Meredith has multi-year printing contracts with two major domestic printers for the printing of our magazines.

Postage is a significant expense of the national media segment. We continually seek the most economical and
effective methods for mail delivery, including cost-saving strategies that leverage work-sharing opportunities
offered within the postal rate structure. Periodical postage accounts for over 80 percent of Meredith's postage costs,
while other mail items—direct mail, replies, and bills—account for nearly 20 percent. The Governors of the United
States Postal Service (USPS) review prices for mailing services annually and adjust postage rates periodically. In
general, postage rate changes are capped by law at the rate of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
The most recent rate change was an increase of less than one percent effective January 2017. With the exception of
fiscal 2016, postage prices have risen in each of Meredith's last five fiscal years. In fiscal 2016, we saw a rare
reduction in postage prices due to a roll-back of the temporary 4.3 percent exigent increase implemented in January
2014. While we expect postage prices to again increase in January 2018, a legislatively mandated calendar 2017
review of the existing law by the Postal Regulatory Commission could potentially result in adjustments to the
current rate setting regime. The impact of any such change could be effective as early as the first quarter of calendar
2018. Meredith continues to work independently and with others to encourage and help the USPS find and
implement efficiencies to contain rate increases. We cannot, however, predict future changes in the postal rates or
the impact they will have on our national media business.

Subscription fulfillment services for Meredith's national media segment are provided by third parties. National
magazine newsstand distribution services are also provided by third parties through multi-year agreements.

Competition
Publishing is a highly competitive business. The Company's magazines and related publishing products and services
compete with other mass media, including the internet and many other leisure-time activities. Competition for
advertising dollars is based primarily on advertising rates, circulation levels, reader demographics, advertiser
results, and sales team effectiveness. Competition for readers is based principally on editorial content, marketing
skills, price, and customer service. While competition is strong for established titles, gaining readership for newer
magazines and specialty publications is especially competitive.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

Executive officers are elected to one year terms each November. The current executive officers of the Company are:

Stephen M. Lacy—Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2016 - present) and a director of the Company since
2004. Formerly Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer (2010 - 2016). Age 63.

Thomas H. Harty—President and Chief Operating Officer (2016 - present) and a director of the Company since
August 2017. Formerly President, National Media Group (2010 - 2016). Age 54.

Paul A. Karpowicz—President, Local Media Group (2005 - present). Age 64.

Jonathan B. Werther—President, National Media Group (2016 - present). Formerly EVP/President Meredith
Digital (2013 - 2016) and Chief Strategy Officer (2012 - 2013). Age 48.

Joseph H. Ceryanec—Chief Financial Officer (2008 - present). Age 56.

John S. Zieser—Chief Development Officer/General Counsel and Secretary (2006 - present). Age 58.

EMPLOYEES

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had approximately 3,500 full-time and 120 part-time employees. Only a small
percentage of our workforce is unionized. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

OTHER

Name recognition and the public image of the Company's trademarks (e.g., Better Homes & Gardens and Parents)
and television station call letters are vital to the success of our ongoing operations and to the introduction of new
businesses. The Company protects our brands by aggressively defending our trademarks and call letters.

The Company had no material expenses for research and development during the past three fiscal years. Revenues
from individual customers and revenues, operating profits, and identifiable assets of foreign operations were not
significant. Compliance with federal, state, and local provisions relating to the discharge of materials into the
environment and to the protection of the environment had no material effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or
the Company's competitive position.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Company's corporate website is meredith.com. The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into
this Form 10-K. Meredith makes available free of charge through our website our Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as
reasonably practical after such documents are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Meredith also
makes available on our website our corporate governance information including charters of all of our Board
Committees, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Ethics, and our Bylaws. Copies of such documents
are also available free of charge upon written request.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K, including the sections titled Item 1-Business, Item 1A-Risk Factors, and Item 7-Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements
that relate to future events or our future financial performance. We may also make written and oral forward-looking
statements in our SEC filings and elsewhere. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, trends, and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking
statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those items described in Item 1A-Risk Factors below, those
identified elsewhere in this document, and other risks and factors identified from time to time in our SEC filings.
We have tried, where possible, to identify such statements by using words such as believe, expect, intend, estimate,
may, anticipate, will, likely, project, plan, and similar expressions in connection with any discussion of future
operating or financial performance. Any forward-looking statements are and will be based upon our then-current
expectations, estimates, and assumptions regarding future events and are applicable only as of the dates of such
statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements that are part of
this filing; actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K, investors should
consider carefully the following risk factors when investing in our securities. In addition to the risks described
below, there may be additional risks that we have not yet perceived or that we currently believe are immaterial.

Advertising represents the largest portion of our revenues and advertising demand may fluctuate from
period to period. In fiscal 2017, 55 percent of our revenues were derived from advertising. Advertising constitutes
66 percent of our local media revenues and 48 percent of our national media revenues. Demand for advertising is
highly dependent upon the strength of the U.S. economy. During an economic downturn, demand for advertising
may decrease. The growth in alternative forms of media, particularly electronic media including those based on the
internet, has increased the competition for advertising dollars, which could in turn reduce expenditures for
magazine and television advertising or suppress advertising rates.

Circulation revenues represent a significant portion of our revenues. Magazine circulation is another significant
source of revenue, representing 19 percent of total revenues and 30 percent of national media revenues. Preserving
the number of copies sold is critical for maintaining advertising sales. Magazines face increasing competition from
alternative forms of media and entertainment. As a result, sales of magazines through subscriptions and at the
newsstand could decline. As publishers compete for subscribers, subscription prices could decrease and marketing
expenditures may increase.

Technology in the media industry continues to evolve rapidly. Advances in technology have led to an increasing
number of alternative methods for the delivery of content and have driven consumer demand and expectations in
unanticipated directions. If we are unable to exploit new and existing technologies to distinguish our products and
services from those of our competitors or adapt to new distribution methods that provide optimal user experiences,
our business, financial condition, and prospects may be adversely affected. Technology developments also pose
other challenges that could adversely affect our revenues and competitive position. New delivery platforms may
lead to pricing restrictions, the loss of distribution control, and the loss of a direct relationship with consumers. We
may also be adversely affected if the use of technology developed to block the display of advertising on websites
proliferates. In addition, technologies such as subscription streaming media services and mobile video are
increasing competition for household audiences and advertisers. This competition may make it difficult for us to

grow or maintain our broadcasting and print revenues, which we believe may challenge us to expand the
contribution of our digital businesses.

Our websites and internal networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized persons accessing our systems, which
could disrupt our operations. The Company uses computers in substantially all aspects of our business operations,
and our revenues are increasingly dependent on digital products. Such increases exposes us to potential cyber
incidents resulting from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Our website activities involve the storage and
transmission of proprietary information, which we strive to protect from unauthorized access. However, it is
possible that unauthorized persons may be able to circumvent our protections and misappropriate proprietary
information or cause interruptions or malfunctions in our digital operations. We invest in security resources and
technology to protect our data and business processes against risk of data security breaches and cyber-attack, but the
techniques used to attempt attacks are constantly changing. A breach or successful attack could have a negative
impact on our operations or business reputation.

Evolving privacy and information security laws and regulations may impair our ability to market to
consumers. Meredith's consumer database includes first-party data that is used to market our products to our
customers and is also rented to or used on behalf of marketing and advertising clients. As public awareness shifts to
data gathering and usage, privacy rights, and data protection, new laws and regulations may be passed that would
restrict or prevent us from utilizing this data. Such restrictions could reduce or eliminate this resource for generating
revenue for the Company.

World events may result in unexpected adverse operating results for our local media segment. Our local
media results could be affected adversely by world events such as wars, political unrest, acts of terrorism, and
natural disasters. Such events can result in significant declines in advertising revenues as the stations will not
broadcast or will limit broadcasting of commercials during times of crisis. In addition, our stations may have higher
newsgathering costs related to coverage of the events.

Our local media operations are subject to FCC regulation. Our broadcasting stations operate under licenses
granted by the FCC. The FCC regulates many aspects of television station operations including employment
practices, political advertising, indecency and obscenity, programming, signal carriage, and various other technical
matters. Violations of these regulations could result in penalties and fines. Changes in these regulations could
impact the results of our operations. The FCC also regulates the ownership of television stations. Changes in the
ownership rules could adversely affect our ability to consummate future transactions. Details regarding regulation
and its impact on our local media operations are provided in Item 1-Business beginning on page 5.

Loss of or changes in affiliation agreements could adversely affect operating results for our local media
segment. Due to the quality of the programming provided by the networks, stations that are affiliated with a
network generally have higher ratings than unaffiliated independent stations in the same market. As a result, it is
important for stations to maintain their network affiliations. Most of our stations have network affiliation
agreements. Seven are affiliated with CBS, five with FOX, two with MyNetworkTV, one with NBC, and one with
ABC. These television networks produce and distribute programming in exchange for each of our stations'
commitment to air the programming at specified times and for commercial announcement time during the
programming. In most cases, we also make cash payments to the networks. These payments are in essence a portion
of the retransmission consent fees that Meredith receives from cable, satellite, and telecommunications service
providers, which pay Meredith to carry our television programming in our markets. These network relationships
may also include terms regarding over-the-top distribution. The non-renewal or termination of any of our network
affiliation agreements would prevent us from being able to carry programming of the affiliate network. This loss of
programming would require us to obtain replacement programming, which may involve higher costs and/or which
may not be as attractive to our audiences, resulting in reduced revenues. Furthermore, the non-renewal of any
retransmission consent agreement with a major cable, satellite, or telecommunications service provider could
adversely affect the economics of our relationship with the applicable network(s), advertising revenues, and our
local brands. If renewed, our network affiliation agreements and our retransmission agreements may be renewed on
terms that are less favorable to us. Our CBS affiliation agreements expire in June and August 2020. The

MyNetworkTV affiliation agreements expire in September 2018. Our FOX affiliation agreements expire in
December 2018. Our NBC affiliation agreement expires in December 2017 and our ABC affiliation agreement
expires in December 2019.

Client relationships are important to our brand licensing and consumer relationship marketing businesses.
Our ability to maintain existing client relationships and generate new clients depends significantly on the quality of
our products and services, our reputation, and the continuity of Company and client personnel. Dissatisfaction with
our products and services, damage to our reputation, or changes in key personnel could result in a loss of business.

Paper and postage prices are difficult to predict and control. Paper and postage represent significant
components of our total cost to produce, distribute, and market our printed products. In fiscal 2017, these expenses
accounted for 19 percent of national media's operating costs. Paper is a commodity and its price can be subject to
significant volatility. All of our paper supply contracts currently provide for price adjustments based on prevailing
market prices; however, we historically have been able to realize favorable paper pricing through volume discounts.
The USPS distributes substantially all of our subscription magazines and many of our marketing materials. Postal
rates are dependent on the operating efficiency of the USPS and on legislative mandates imposed upon the USPS.
Although we work with others in the industry and through trade organizations to encourage the USPS to implement
efficiencies that will minimize rate increases, we cannot predict with certainty the magnitude of future price
changes for paper and postage. Further, we may not be able to pass such increases on to our customers.

Acquisitions pose inherent financial and other risks and challenges. As a part of our strategic plan, we have
acquired businesses and we expect to continue acquiring businesses in the future. These acquisitions can involve a
number of risks and challenges, any of which could cause significant operating inefficiencies and adversely affect
our growth and profitability. Such risks and challenges include underperformance relative to our expectations and
the price paid for the acquisition; unanticipated demands on our management and operational resources; difficulty
in integrating personnel, operations, and systems; retention of customers of the combined businesses; assumption of
contingent liabilities; and acquisition-related earnings charges. If our acquisitions are not successful, we may record
impairment charges. Our ability to continue to make acquisitions will depend upon our success at identifying
suitable targets, which requires substantial judgment in assessing their values, strengths, weaknesses, liabilities, and
potential profitability, as well as the availability of suitable candidates at acceptable prices and whether restrictions
are imposed by regulations. Moreover, competition for certain types of acquisitions is significant, particularly in the
fields of broadcast stations and digital media. Even if successfully negotiated, closed, and integrated, certain
acquisitions may not advance our business strategy and may fall short of expected return on investment targets.

Further impairment of goodwill and intangible assets is possible, depending upon future operating results
and the value of the Company's stock. Although the Company wrote down certain of its intangible assets,
including goodwill and trademarks, by $5.3 million in fiscal 2017 and $155.8 million in fiscal 2016, further
impairment charges are possible. We test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment during
the fourth quarter of every fiscal year and on an interim basis if indicators of impairment exist. Factors which
influence the evaluation include, among many things, the Company's stock price and expected future operating
results. If the carrying value of a reporting unit or an intangible asset is no longer deemed to be recoverable, a
potentially material non-cash impairment charge could be incurred. At June 30, 2017, goodwill and intangible assets
totaled $1.9 billion, or 68 percent of Meredith's total assets, with $1.0 billion in the national media segment and
$0.9 billion in the local media segment. The review of goodwill is performed at the reporting unit level. The
Company has three reporting units - local media, magazine brands, and MXM. As of May 31, 2017, the date that
management last performed our annual review of impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, there were no
qualitative factors that indicated that a quantitative impairment analysis was needed for the the local media
reporting unit. The fair value of the magazine brands reporting unit exceeded its net assets by more than 30 percent
and the MXM reporting unit exceeded its net assets by nearly 80 percent. Changes in key assumptions about the
economy or business prospects used to estimate fair value or other changes in market conditions could result in
additional impairment charges. Although these charges would be non-cash in nature and would not affect the
Company's operations or cash flow, they would reduce stockholders' equity and reported results of operations in the
period charged.

We have two classes of stock with different voting rights. We have two classes of stock: common stock and Class
B stock. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share and account for 44 percent of the voting power.
Holders of Class B stock are entitled to ten votes per share and account for the remaining 56 percent of the voting
power. There are restrictions on who can own Class B stock. The majority of Class B shares are held by members of
Meredith's founding family. Control by a limited number of holders may make the Company a less attractive
takeover target, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. This voting control also
prevents other shareholders from exercising significant influence over certain of the Company's business decisions.

The preceding risk factors should not be construed as a complete list of factors that
may affect our future operations and financial results.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Meredith is headquartered in Des Moines, IA. The Company owns buildings at 1716 and 1615 Locust Street and is
the sole occupant of these buildings. The Company believes these facilities are adequate for their intended use.

The local media segment operates from facilities in the following locations: Atlanta, GA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Louis,
MO; Beaverton, OR; Nashville, TN; Rocky Hill, CT; Fairway, KS; Greenville, SC; Henderson, NV; Mobile, AL;
Saginaw, MI; and Springfield, MA. The Company believes these properties are adequate for their intended use. The
property in St. Louis is leased, while the other properties are owned by the Company. Each of the broadcast stations
also maintains one or more owned or leased transmitter sites.

The national media segment operates mainly from the Des Moines offices and from a leased facility in New York,
NY. The New York facility is used primarily as advertising sales offices for all Meredith magazines and as
headquarters for the Family Circle, Shape, Parents, FamilyFun, Fit Pregnancy and Baby, and Rachael Ray Every
Day properties. Allrecipes operates out of leased space in Seattle, WA. We have also entered into leases for
magazine editorial offices, MXM operations, and national media sales offices in the states of California, Colorado,
Illinois, Michigan, Texas, Vermont, and Virginia. The Company believes these facilities are sufficient to meet our
current and expected future requirements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are various legal proceedings pending against the Company arising from the ordinary course of business. In
the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from existing litigation and claims are not expected to have a
material effect on the Company's earnings, financial position, or liquidity.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION, DIVIDENDS, AND HOLDERS

The principal market for trading Meredith's common stock is the New York Stock Exchange (trading symbol MDP).
There is no separate public trading market for Meredith's Class B stock, which is convertible share for share at any
time into common stock. Holders of both classes of stock receive equal dividends per share.

The range of trading prices for the Company's common stock and the dividends per share paid during each quarter
of the past two fiscal years are presented below.

Fiscal 2017
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Fiscal 2016
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

High

Low

Dividends

57.53
59.70
66.25
66.15

49.17
43.85
54.60
51.20

0.4950
0.4950
0.5200
0.5200

High

Low

Dividends

53.11
47.70
48.00
52.49

39.40
38.80
35.03
44.80

0.4575
0.4575
0.4950
0.4950

Meredith stock became publicly traded in 1946, and quarterly dividends have been paid continuously since 1947.
Meredith has increased our dividend for 24 consecutive years. It is currently anticipated that comparable dividends
will continue to be paid in the future.

On July 31, 2017, there were approximately 930 holders of record of the Company's common stock and 510 holders
of record of Class B stock.

COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDER RETURN

The following graph compares the performance of the Company's common stock during the period July 1, 2012, to
June 30, 2017, with the Standard and Poor's (S&P) MidCap 400 Index and with a peer group of companies engaged
in multimedia businesses primarily with publishing and/or television broadcasting in common with the Company.

The S&P MidCap 400 Index is comprised of 400 mid-sized U.S. companies with a market cap in the range of $1.6
billion to $6.8 billion in primarily the information technology, financial, industrial, and consumer discretionary
industries weighted by market capitalization. The peer group selected by the Company for comparison, which is
weighted by market capitalization, is comprised of Media General, Inc. (until its acquisition by Nexstar
Broadcasting Group, Inc.on January 17, 2017); Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc.; TEGNA Inc.; The E.W. Scripps
Company; and Time Inc. (since June 9, 2014, the date its stock began trading).

The graph depicts the results for investing $100 in the Company's common stock, the S&P MidCap 400 Index, and
the peer group at closing prices on June 30, 2012, assuming dividends were reinvested.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company's repurchases of common stock during the
quarter ended June 30, 2017.

Period

April 1 to
April 30, 2017
May 1 to
May 31, 2017
June 1 to
June 30, 2017

Total

(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased 1, 2

(b)
Average price
paid
per share

(d)
Approximate dollar value
of shares that may yet be
purchased under the
programs

1,625

64.26

40,653

—

42,278

53.28

—

53.71

499

40,358

—

40,857

(in thousands)

70,191

68,040

1 The number of shares purchased includes 499 shares in April 2017 and 358 shares in May 2017 delivered or deemed to be delivered to us

in satisfaction of tax withholding on option exercises and the vesting of restricted shares. These shares are included as part of our
repurchase program and reduce the repurchase authority granted by our Board.

2 The number of shares purchased includes 1,126 shares in April 2017 and 295 shares in May 2017 deemed to be delivered to us on tender

of stock in payment for the exercise price of options. These shares do not reduce the repurchase authority granted by our Board.

In May 2014, Meredith announced the Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $100.0 million in
additional shares of the Company's stock through public and private transactions. The table above reflects the
amounts that may be repurchased under this authorization.

For more information on the Company's share repurchase program, see Item 7-Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading "Share Repurchase Program" on
page 34.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected financial data for the fiscal years 2013 through 2017 are contained under the heading "Five-Year Financial
History with Selected Financial Data" beginning on page 89 and are primarily derived from consolidated financial
statements for those years. Information contained in that table is not necessarily indicative of results of operations in
future years and should be read in conjunction with Item 7-Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) consists of the
following sections:

Executive Overview ............................................................

Results of Operations ..........................................................

Liquidity and Capital Resources .........................................

Critical Accounting Policies................................................

Accounting and Reporting Developments ..........................

Page

MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Form 10-K, including Item 1-Business, Item 6-
Selected Financial Data, and Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. MD&A contains forward-
looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements
are based upon our current expectations and could be affected by many risks, uncertainties, and changes in
circumstances including the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing, particularly in Item 1A-
Risk Factors. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-
looking statements are set forth under the heading “Forward Looking Statements" in Item 1-Business.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Meredith has been committed to service journalism for 115 years. Today, Meredith uses multiple distribution
platforms – including broadcast television, print, digital, mobile, and video – to provide consumers with content
they desire and to deliver the messages of its advertising and marketing partners.

Meredith operates two business segments. The local media segment includes 17 television stations reaching 11
percent of U.S. households. Meredith’s portfolio is concentrated in large, fast-growing markets, with seven stations
in the nation’s Top 25 markets—including Atlanta, Phoenix, St. Louis, and Portland—and 13 in Top 50 markets.
Meredith’s stations produce 700 hours of local news and entertainment content each week, and operate leading local
digital destinations.

Meredith’s national media segment reaches more than 110 million unduplicated American women, including more
than 70 percent of U.S. millennial women. Meredith is the leader in creating content across media platforms in key
consumer interest areas such as food, home, parenting, and lifestyle through well-known brands such as Better
Homes & Gardens, Allrecipes, Parents, and Shape. The national media segment features robust brand licensing
activities, including more than 3,000 SKUs of branded products at 5,000 Walmart stores across the U.S. and at
Walmart.com. MXM is an award-winning, strategic, and creative agency that provides fully integrated marketing
solutions for many of the world’s top brands.

Both segments operate primarily in the U.S. and compete against similar media and other types of media on both a
local and national basis. In fiscal 2017, the national media segment accounted for 63 percent of the Company's $1.7
billion in revenues while local media segment revenues contributed 37 percent.

Meredith continued to aggressively execute a series of well-defined strategic initiatives in fiscal 2017 to generate
growth in revenue and operating profit, and increase shareholder value over time. These included:

•

Increasing Meredith’s powerful consumer connection - Consumer engagement expanded across
Meredith’s media platforms, including magazine readership, digital and mobile traffic, and sales of branded
product at retail.

• Rapidly growing digital, mobile, video, and social platforms - Total Company digital advertising
revenues grew 20 percent. National media digital advertising increased more than 20 percent and
represented more than 30 percent of its total advertising. Local media digital advertising rose more than 15
percent. Traffic across Meredith’s digital properties averaged 86 million unique visitors per month, an
increase of 8 percent over the prior year.

• Generating record political advertising revenues - Our television stations generated $63 million of
political advertising revenues, an increase of 43 percent compared to the fiscal 2015 election cycle.

• Expanding Meredith’s media portfolio:

◦

In the local media segment, Meredith acquired Peachtree TV in Atlanta, the nation’s 10th largest
market. With Peachtree TV, we created our fifth owned-and-operated duopoly. To further strengthen
our competitive position, we added newscasts in Atlanta, Phoenix, Portland, Nashville, Greenville,
and Flint/Saginaw.

In the national media segment, we launched The Magnolia Journal, an extension of Joanna and
Chip Gaines’ popular Magnolia brand. It quickly became the strongest-selling newsstand title in
Meredith’s recent history and is currently selling more than 900,000 copies of each issue.

•

Successful renewal of key strategic agreements:

◦

In the local media segment, we renewed our CBS affiliation agreements for our stations in Atlanta,
Phoenix, Kansas City, and Flint/Saginaw into fiscal 2021. We also extended our FOX agreements
in Portland, Las Vegas, Greenville, Mobile, and Springfield into fiscal 2019.

In the national media segment, we renewed our licensing program with Walmart. In addition, we
launched several new brand licensing programs, including a well-received EatingWell line of
frozen entrées and a Shape line of apparel for women.

•

Successful execution of our total shareholder return strategy - We increased our dividend by 5.1 percent
to $2.08 per share on an annualized basis, its 24th consecutive year of dividend growth. As of June 30,
2017, our dividend yield was 3.5 percent.

LOCAL MEDIA

Local media derives the majority of its revenues—66 percent in fiscal 2017—from the sale of advertising both over
the air and on our stations' websites and apps. The remainder comes from television retransmission consent fees,
television production, and other services.

The stations sell advertising to both local/regional and national accounts. Political advertising revenues are cyclical
in that they are significantly greater during biennial election campaigns (which take place primarily in odd-
numbered fiscal years) than at other times. We generate additional revenues from internet activities and programs
focused on local interests such as community events and college and professional sports.

Changes in advertising revenues tend to correlate with changes in the level of economic activity in the U.S. and in
the local markets in which we operate stations, and with the cyclical changes in political advertising discussed
previously. Programming content, audience share, audience demographics, and the advertising rates charged
relative to other available advertising opportunities also affect advertising revenues. On occasion, unusual events
necessitate uninterrupted television coverage and will adversely affect spot advertising revenues.

Local media's major expense categories are employee compensation and programming fees paid to the networks.
Employee compensation represented 40 percent of local media's operating expenses in fiscal 2017. Compensation
expense is affected by salary and incentive levels, the number of employees, the costs of our various employee
benefit plans, and other factors. Programming fees paid to the networks represented 24 percent of this segment's
fiscal 2017 expenses. Sales and promotional activities, costs to produce local news programming, and general
overhead costs for facilities and technical resources accounted for most of the remaining 36 percent of local media's
fiscal 2017 operating expenses.

NATIONAL MEDIA

Advertising revenues made up 48 percent of fiscal 2017 national media revenues. These revenues were generated
from the sale of advertising space in our magazines and on our websites to clients interested in promoting their
brands, products, and services to consumers. Changes in advertising revenues tend to correlate with changes in the
level of economic activity in the U.S. Indicators of economic activity include changes in the level of gross domestic
product, consumer spending, housing starts, unemployment rates, auto sales, and interest rates. Circulation levels of
Meredith's magazines, reader demographic data, and the advertising rates charged relative to other comparable
available advertising opportunities also affect the level of advertising revenues.

Circulation revenues accounted for 30 percent of fiscal 2017 national media revenues. Circulation revenues result
from the sale of magazines to consumers through subscriptions and by single copy sales on newsstands in print
form, primarily at major retailers and grocery/drug stores, and in digital form on tablets and other media devices. In
the short term, subscription revenues, which accounted for 86 percent of circulation revenues, are less susceptible to
economic changes because subscriptions are generally sold for terms of one to three years. The same economic
factors that affect advertising revenues also can influence consumers' response to subscription offers and result in
lower revenues and/or higher costs to maintain subscriber levels over time. Subscription revenues per copy and
related costs can also vary significantly by subscription source. Some subscription sources generate lower revenues
than other sources, but have proportionately lower related costs. A key factor in our subscription success is our
industry-leading database. It contains an abundance of attributes on 125 million individuals, which represents 80
percent of American homeowners and nearly 65 percent of millennial women. The size and depth of our database is
a key to our circulation model and allows more precise consumer targeting. Newsstand revenues are more volatile
than subscription revenues and can vary significantly month to month depending on economic and other factors.

The remaining 22 percent of national media revenues came from a variety of activities that included the sale of
customer relationship marketing products and services as well as brand licensing, digital lead generation and other
eCommerce sales, product sales, and other related activities. MXM offers integrated promotional, database
management, relationship, and direct marketing capabilities for corporate customers, both in printed and digital
forms. These other revenues are generally affected by changes in the level of economic activity in the U.S.
including changes in the level of gross domestic product, consumer spending, unemployment rates, and interest
rates.

National media's major expense categories are production and delivery of publications and promotional mailings
and employee compensation costs. Paper, postage, and production charges represented 27 percent of the segment's
operating expenses in fiscal 2017. The price of paper can vary significantly on the basis of worldwide demand and
supply for paper in general and for specific types of paper used by Meredith. The printing of our publications is
outsourced. We typically have multi-year contracts for the printing of our magazines, a practice which reduces price
fluctuations over the contract term. Postal rates are dependent on the operating efficiency of the USPS and on

legislative mandates imposed on the USPS. The USPS adjusted rates most recently in January 2017, which resulted
in an increase of less than one percent. While we expect postage prices to increase again in January 2018, a
legislatively mandated calendar 2017 review of the existing law by the Postal Regulatory Commission could
potentially result in adjustments to the current rate setting regime. Meredith works with others in the industry and
through trade organizations to encourage the USPS to implement efficiencies and contain rate increases.

Employee compensation, which includes benefits expense, represented 27 percent of national media's operating
expenses in fiscal 2017, and is affected by the same factors noted for local media. The remaining 46 percent of
fiscal 2017 national media expenses included costs for magazine newsstand distribution, advertising and
promotional efforts, and overhead costs for facilities and technology services.

FISCAL 2017 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

•

Local media revenues increased 15 percent and operating profit rose 36 percent reflecting increased cyclical
political advertising and higher retransmission consent revenues.

• National media revenues declined 2 percent as declines in the revenues of our magazine operations of $43.0

million and our MXM operations of $6.7 million more than offset increased revenues in our digital
operations of $34.2 million. Approximately 30 percent of the decline in magazine operation revenues was
due to the closure of MORE magazine effective following the April 2016 issue. Operating expenses
decreased 16 percent. In fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $5.3
million to reduce trademarks whereas in fiscal 2016, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment
charges of $155.8 million to reduce goodwill and trademarks. Due primarily to the significantly smaller
impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2017, national media operating profit increased $164.2 million in
fiscal 2017. In addition, growth in the operating profit of our digital operations of $21.6 million and an
increase in the reduction of previously accrued contingent consideration payable of $15.3 million more than
offset declines in the operating profit of our magazine operations of $14.4 million and MXM's operations of
$7.2 million.

• Due to the resolution of certain federal and state tax matters, an income tax benefit of $6.7 million was

recorded in fiscal 2017.

• During fiscal 2017, management committed to several performance improvement plans related primarily to
business realignments. These actions resulted in selected workforce reductions. In connection with these
plans, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges totaling $12.4 million, which consisted
primarily of severance and related benefit costs for the involuntary termination of employees.

• Diluted earnings per share increased 455 percent to $4.16 from $0.75 in the prior year primarily due to the
increase in political advertising and retransmission consent revenues, the increase in the reduction of
previously accrued contingent consideration payable, and the credit to income taxes. Prior-year earnings per
share was impacted by the goodwill and trademark impairments, income received from the termination of a
merger, and merger-related expenses incurred by the Company.

•

In fiscal 2017, we generated $219.3 million in operating cash flows, invested $84.4 million in acquisitions
of and investments in businesses, and invested $34.8 million in capital improvements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2017

2016

Change

Years ended June 30,
(In millions except per share data)
4 % $ 1,649.6
Total revenues............................................................... $ 1,713.4
1,341.9
0 %
1,344.1
Costs and expenses .......................................................
59.1
(9)%
53.9
Depreciation and amortization .....................................
161.5
6.2
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ....
(96)%
(43.5)
— (100)%
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs .....
1,519.0
(8)%
Total operating expenses ..............................................
130.6
137 % $
Income from operations................................................ $
33.9
457 % $
Net earnings.................................................................. $
Diluted earnings per share ............................................
0.75
455 %
n/m - Not meaningful

1,404.2
309.2
188.9
4.16

Change

2015

3 % $ 1,594.2
1,294.3
4 %
56.5
5 %
1.3
n/m
—
n/m
1,352.1
12 %
242.1
(46)% $
136.8
(75)% $
3.02
(75)%

OVERVIEW

Following are brief descriptions of recent acquisitions and a discussion of the trends and uncertainties that affected
our businesses. Following the Overview is an analysis of the results of operations for the local media and national
media segments and an analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the last three fiscal years.

Acquisitions

Meredith acquired the assets of a digital lead-generation company in the home services market in December 2016
and completed, in April 2017, the acquisition of Peachtree TV, an independent station in Atlanta, Georgia, which
was operated by Meredith prior to its acquisition. The results of these acquisitions have been included in the
Company's consolidated operating results since their respective acquisition dates. See Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information.

Trends and Uncertainties

Advertising revenues accounted for 55 percent of total revenues in fiscal 2017. Advertising demand is the
Company's key uncertainty, and its fluctuation from period to period can have a material effect on operating results.
Demand for political advertising in the Company’s local media segment is cyclical in nature, generally following
the biennial cycle of election campaigns with peaks occurring in our odd fiscal years (e.g., fiscal 2015, fiscal 2017)
and particularly in our second fiscal quarter of those fiscal years. Other significant uncertainties that can affect
operating results include fluctuations in the cost of paper, postage rates, and over time, television programming
rights. The Company's cash flows from operating activities, our primary source of liquidity, is adversely affected
when the advertising market is weak or when costs rise. One of our priorities is to manage our businesses prudently
during expanding and contracting economic cycles to maximize shareholder return over time. To manage the
uncertainties inherent in our businesses, we prepare monthly internal forecasts of anticipated results of operations
and monitor the economic indicators mentioned in the Executive Overview. See Item 1A-Risk Factors in this
Form 10-K for further discussion.

LOCAL MEDIA

The following discussion reviews operating results for the Company's local media segment, which consists of 17
television stations and related digital and mobile media. The local media segment contributed 37 percent of
Meredith's consolidated revenues in fiscal 2017 and 59 percent of the combined operating profit from local media
and national media operations in fiscal 2017.

Fiscal 2017 local media revenues rose 15 percent and operating profit grew 36 percent primarily reflecting
increased cyclical political advertising and higher retransmission consent revenues.

Local media revenues increased 3 percent in fiscal 2016 as revenues from the acquisition of two television stations
in fiscal 2015 and strong increases in other revenues more than offset a $30.8 million cyclical reduction in political
advertising, which was expected in a non-political year. Local media operating profit declined 3 percent in fiscal
2016.

Local media operating results for the last three fiscal years were as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

(In millions)
Revenues...................................................................... $
Operating expenses......................................................
Operating profit ........................................................... $

630.1
(415.2)
214.9

15% $
6%
36% $

548.4
(389.9)
158.5

3 % $
5 %
(3)% $

534.3
(371.6)
162.7

Local Media Revenues

The table below presents the components of revenues for the last three fiscal years.

Years ended June 30,

(In millions)
Revenues

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

Non-political advertising......................................... $
Political advertising.................................................
Other........................................................................
Total revenues .............................................................. $

351.5
62.5
216.1
630.1

(6)% $

379 %
34 %
15 % $

374.1
13.0
161.3
548.4

5 % $

(70)%
20 %
3 % $

356.5
43.8
134.0
534.3

Local media revenues increased 15 percent in fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher political
advertising related to the November 2016 elections. Political advertising revenues totaled $62.5 million in fiscal
2017 compared with $13.0 million in fiscal 2016. Fluctuations in political advertising revenues at our stations, and
throughout the broadcasting industry, generally follow the biennial cycle of election campaigns. Political
advertising displaces a certain amount of non-political advertising; therefore, the revenues are not entirely
incremental. Non-political advertising revenues decreased 6 percent in fiscal 2017, due primarily to political
advertising displacement, the Super Bowl moving to FOX from CBS, and the Summer Olympic games on NBC.
Local non-political advertising revenues declined 5 percent and national non-political advertising revenues
decreased 11 percent in fiscal 2017. Digital advertising increased 17 percent as compared to fiscal 2016 as a series
of growth strategies continued to drive higher advertising rates across the station group.

Other revenues, which are primarily retransmission consent fees from cable, satellite, and telecommunications
operators, increased 34 percent in fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased retransmission consent fees.

Local media revenues increased 3 percent in fiscal 2016. Non-political advertising revenues increased 5 percent.
Non-political advertising revenues from station acquisitions accounted for almost 75 percent of the increase.
Organic local non-political advertising revenues increased 1 percent in fiscal 2016 and organic national non-
political advertising revenues increased 2 percent. Political advertising revenues totaled $13.0 million in fiscal 2016
as compared with $43.8 million in the prior year. Digital advertising increased 13 percent in fiscal 2016 due to the
addition of digital advertising revenues from station acquisitions and organic growth.

Other revenues grew 20 percent in fiscal 2016. Incremental other revenues from station acquisitions accounted for
approximately 25 percent of the increase. The remainder was primarily due to an increase in retransmission consent
fees of $27.6 million partially offset by a reduction in station management fees of $2.6 million.

Local Media Operating Expenses

Local media operating expenses increased 6 percent in fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher programming fees paid
to affiliated networks.

Fiscal 2016 local media operating expenses increased 5 percent. Incremental operating expenses from station
acquisitions of $13.4 million, increased programming fees paid to affiliated networks of $9.7 million, and increased
performance-based incentive accruals of $3.3 million were partially offset by reductions in employee compensation
costs of $2.2 million. In addition, the lack of $2.3 million in acquisition and disposal transaction costs as compared
to the prior year and a reduction in previously accrued restructuring costs of $2.1 million recorded in fiscal 2016
also helped offset the increases.

Local Media Operating Profit

Local media operating profit increased 36 percent in fiscal 2017 primarily reflecting the increase in higher-margin
political advertising and retransmission consent revenues.

Fiscal 2016 local media operating profit declined 3 percent compared with fiscal 2015 primarily due to a change in
the mix of revenues from higher-margin political advertising revenues to lower margin revenues and increased
operating expenses.

NATIONAL MEDIA

The following discussion reviews operating results for our national media segment, which includes magazine
publishing, digital and customer relationship marketing, digital and mobile media, brand licensing, database-related
activities, and other related operations. The national media segment contributed 63 percent of Meredith's
consolidated revenues in fiscal 2017 and 41 percent of the combined operating profit from local media and national
media operations in fiscal 2017.

Fiscal 2017 national media revenues declined 2 percent. Costs and expenses decreased 3 percent and an impairment
charge of $5.3 million was recorded. Fiscal 2017 segment operating profit was $146.5 million.

National media revenues increased 4 percent in fiscal 2016. Costs and expenses increased 3 percent and impairment
charges of $155.8 million were recorded in the national media segment. Due to the impairment charges, the national
media operations reported an operating loss of $17.7 million in fiscal 2016.

National media operating results for the last three fiscal years were as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

(In millions)
Revenues ...................................................................... $ 1,083.2
Operating expenses

(2)% $ 1,101.2

4% $ 1,059.9

Costs and expenses ....................................................
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets..
Total operating expenses............................................
Operating profit (loss) .................................................. $

(931.4)
(5.3)
(936.7)
146.5

(3)%
(97)%
(16)%
n/m

(963.1)
(155.8)
(1,118.9)
(17.7)

3%
n/m
19%
n/m

(937.2)
—
(937.2)
122.7

n/m - Not meaningful

National Media Revenues

The table below presents the components of revenues for the last three fiscal years.

Years ended June 30,

(In millions)
Revenues

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

Advertising ............................................................. $
Circulation ..............................................................
Other .......................................................................

520.1
322.0
241.1
Total revenues ............................................................. $ 1,083.2

527.1
(1)% $
328.6
(2)%
(2)%
245.5
(2)% $ 1,101.2

496.2
6 % $
313.7
5 %
(2)%
250.0
4 % $ 1,059.9

Advertising Revenue
The following table presents advertising page information according to Publishers Information Bureau for our
major subscription-based magazines for the last three fiscal years:

Years ended June 30,
Better Homes & Gardens ............................................
Family Circle...............................................................
Parents.........................................................................
Shape / Fitness.............................................................
Martha Stewart Living 1 ..............................................
Rachael Ray Every Day...............................................
Traditional Home ........................................................
Midwest Living ............................................................
FamilyFun ...................................................................
EatingWell ...................................................................
Allrecipes.....................................................................
Fit Pregnancy and Baby / American Baby ..................
More 2 ..........................................................................
¹ Since date of acquisition in fiscal 2015
2 Closed during fiscal 2016

2017
1,043
954
885
885
602
519
440
416
317
305
299
229
—

Change
3 %
1 %
(11)%
(2)%
7 %
6 %
(11)%
12 %
(24)%
7 %
19 %
(10)%
—

2016
1,009
948
994
905
565
491
496
373
418
286
252
254
296

Change
(8)%
(1)%
(7)%
26 %
88 %
(4)%
1 %
4 %
(5)%
11 %
54 %
(18)%
(48)%

2015
1,099
956
1,074
720
301
513
493
358
441
257
164
309
565

National media advertising revenues decreased 1 percent in fiscal 2017. Digital advertising revenues grew 21
percent in fiscal 2017. Growth in digital advertising was primarily led by native, engagement-based video, and

programmatic advertising, along with shopper marketing revenues. Magazine advertising revenues declined 9
percent and advertising pages decreased 5 percent. Approximately 20 percent of the magazine ad revenues decline
and 55 percent of the ad pages decline were due to the closing of MORE magazine. Approximately 50 percent of the
remaining decline in magazine ad revenues and most of the remaining decline in ad pages were due to softness in
the parenting titles. Among our core advertising categories, the food and beverage, direct response, and beauty
categories showed strength while demand was weaker for the finance, prescription drug, and non-prescription drug
categories.

National media advertising revenues increased 6 percent in fiscal 2016. Digital advertising revenues grew 16
percent in fiscal 2016 due to acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, organic growth. Magazine advertising revenues
increased 3 percent and advertising pages increased 7 percent in fiscal 2016. Excluding incremental advertising
revenues and ad pages from acquisitions, magazine advertising revenues and ad pages declined in the mid to high-
single digits on a percentage basis. Among our core advertising categories, demand was weaker for the toiletries
and cosmetics and retail categories while the prescription and non-prescription drugs categories showed strength.

Circulation Revenues
Magazine circulation revenues declined 2 percent in fiscal 2017. Subscription revenues were down in the low-single
digits on a percentage basis. Newsstand revenues declined 1 percent. Subscription and newsstand revenues were
affected by the closure of MORE magazine. Newsstand revenues benefited from the strong performance of The
Magnolia Journal, Meredith’s new quarterly lifestyle magazine based on Joanna and Chip Gaines’ popular
Magnolia brand. The subscription revenues decline was also partially due to ongoing efforts to source a larger
percentage of magazine subscribers from Meredith’s own database instead of external agent sources. This direct-to-
publisher strategy increases circulation profit but lowers revenues over time. The direct-to-publisher strategy is
expected to adversely affect subscription revenues for the foreseeable future.

Fiscal 2016 magazine circulation revenues increased 5 percent. Subscription revenues increased in the mid-single
digits on a percentage basis primarily due to subscription revenues from acquisitions. Newsstand revenues were flat
in fiscal 2016 as increases from acquisitions were offset by overall weaker newsstand demand for most other titles.

Other Revenues
Other revenues decreased 2 percent in fiscal 2017 primarily due to a decline in MXM revenues of $6.7 million due
to certain client losses and project scope reductions and a decrease in brand licensing revenues of $2.4 million.
These declines were partially offset by increases in eCommerce revenues of $8.2 million.

Other revenues declined 2 percent in fiscal 2016 as a decrease in MXM revenues of $12.6 million was partially
offset by increases in content and web development revenues in our magazine operations of $4.8 million and an
increase in brand licensing revenues of $2.5 million.

National Media Costs and Expenses

Fiscal 2017 national media costs and expenses decreased 3 percent in fiscal 2017. An increase in the reduction of
previously accrued contingent consideration payable of $15.3 million and a decline in paper expense of $10.7
million contributed to the decline. Paper expenses declined due to both a decrease in the volume of paper used and a
mid-single digit decline in average paper prices as compared to fiscal 2016. Also contributing to the decline was
decreases in postage and other delivery costs of $8.2 million, lower employee compensation costs of $7.6 million,
decreases in processing costs of $6.1 million, and declines in non-payroll related editorial costs of $4.9 million. The
closing of MORE magazine contributed to the expense declines. These declines were partially offset by higher
magazine and digital-related production costs of $14.5 million and increases in circulation expenses of $5.8 million.

National media costs and expenses increased 3 percent in fiscal 2016. Incremental operating expenses from
acquisitions of $65.5 million and a pension settlement charge of $3.3 million were partially offset by reductions in
paper costs of $7.4 million. Paper expense declined due to both a decrease in the volume of paper used and a low-
single digit decline in average paper prices as compared to the prior year. In addition, non-payroll related editorial

costs declined $7.0 million, employee compensation costs decreased $5.9 million, postage and other delivery costs
were down $5.5 million, and processing costs decreased $3.3 million. Consistent with the decrease in MXM
revenues, MXM operating expenses declined $8.5 million.

National Media Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the national media segment recorded a pre-tax, non-cash impairment
charge of $5.3 million related to a trademark. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the national media segment
recorded a pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $116.9 million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill related
to MXM's operations and a pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $38.9 million related to a trademark.

National Media Operating Profit (Loss)

Fiscal 2017 national media operating profit grew to $146.5 million. The reduction in impairment charges of $150.5
million and an increase in the reduction of previously accrued contingent consideration payable of $15.3 million in
fiscal 2017 contributed to the increase. In addition, growth in the operating profit of our digital operations of $21.6
million partially offset declines in the operating profit of our magazine operations of $14.4 million and MXM's
operations of $7.2 million.

National media operations resulted in a $17.7 million loss in fiscal 2016 reflecting the $155.8 million non-cash
impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of its goodwill and one of its trademarks. Absent the impairment
charges, national media operating profit would have been $138.1 million, an increase of 13 percent from fiscal
2015. The increase is primarily due to incremental operating profit from acquisitions of $17.8 million more than
offsetting a $4.2 million decline in MXM 's operating profit.

UNALLOCATED CORPORATE EXPENSES

Unallocated corporate expenses are general corporate overhead expenses not attributable to the operating groups.
These expenses for the last three fiscal years were as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

(In millions)
Costs and expenses .....................................................
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ..
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs....
Unallocated corporate expenses .................................

n/m - Not meaningful

$ 51.4
0.9
—
$ 52.3

7 %
(85)%
(100)%
413 %

$ 48.0
5.7
(43.5)
$ 10.2

11 %
n/m

n/m
(76)%

$ 43.2
—
—
$ 43.2

Fiscal 2017 unallocated corporate costs and expenses increased 7 percent primarily due to increases in
performance-based incentive accruals of $4.2 million and consulting costs of $1.9 million. These increases more
than offset a gain of $1.7 million related to the sale of an investment that had previously been written off.

Unallocated corporate costs and expenses increased 11 percent in fiscal 2016 primarily due to increases in
performance-based incentive accruals of $2.9 million, consulting costs of $1.6 million, and other small increases in
various expense categories.

During fiscal 2016, the Company's two corporate airplanes met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and as
such were written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell. This resulted in a $5.7 million impairment
charge. An additional impairment charge of $0.9 million was taken on these corporate airplanes during fiscal 2017.

In September 2015, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Media General, Inc. This agreement was
terminated in January 2016. In exchange for terminating the merger agreement, the Company received $60.0
million of cash, which was partially offset by $16.5 million in merger-related expenses.

CONSOLIDATED

Consolidated Operating Expenses

Consolidated operating expenses for the last three fiscal years were as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

Change

2016

Change

2015

(In millions)
602.9
Production, distribution, and editorial ........................ $
741.2
Selling, general, and administrative ...........................
53.9
Depreciation and amortization....................................
6.2
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ..
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs....
—
Operating expenses..................................................... $ 1,404.2

n/m - Not meaningful

(1)% $
2 %
(9)%
(96)%
(100)%

611.8
730.1
59.1
161.5
(43.5)
(8)% $ 1,519.0

2% $
5%
5%
n/m

598.9
695.4
56.5
1.3
—
n/m
12% $ 1,352.1

Production, Distribution, and Editorial Costs
Production, distribution, and editorial costs decreased 1 percent in fiscal 2017 as declines in paper expense of $10.7
million, employee compensation costs of $9.3 million, postage and other delivery costs of $8.2 million, processing
costs of $6.1 million, non-payroll related editorial costs of $4.9 million, and MXM production costs of $4.4 million
more than offset increases in programming fees paid to affiliated networks of $21.1 million and higher magazine
and digital-related production costs of $14.5 million.

Fiscal 2016 production, distribution, and editorial costs increased 2 percent. The addition of expenses of acquired
businesses of $31.0 million and increases in programming fees paid to affiliated networks of $9.7 million, more
than offset declines in paper expenses of $7.4 million, non-payroll related editorial costs of $7.0 million, postage
and other delivery costs of $5.5 million, and processing costs of $3.3 million.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Fiscal 2017 selling, general, and administrative expenses increased 2 percent as increases in MXM selling and
general expenses of $8.4 million, higher circulation expenses of $5.8 million, increased employee compensation
costs of $4.7 million, higher performance-based incentive accruals of $3.9 million, and the write-down of
investments of $3.6 million, were partially offset by an increase in the reduction of previously accrued contingent
consideration payable of $15.3 million.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased 5 percent in fiscal 2016. The addition of expenses from
acquired businesses of $43.0 million, increased performance-based incentive accruals of $6.3 million, and a pension
settlement charge of $5.6 million more than offset declines in employee compensation costs of $12.8 million, lower
severance and related benefit accruals of $4.9 million, and an increase of $3.1 million in the credit to expense for
reduction in previously accrued restructuring accruals.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense declined 9 percent fiscal 2017 primarily due to decreases in depreciation in
our local media segment.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 5 percent in fiscal 2016 due primarily to increased depreciation
and amortization from acquisitions of $4.9 million partially offset by certain intangible assets related to prior
acquisitions becoming fully amortized.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-lived Assets
The impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2017 related to a pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $5.3 million
related to a trademark in the national media segment. During fiscal 2016, the national media segment recorded a
pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $116.9 million to reduce the carrying value of goodwill related to MXM's
operations and a pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $38.9 million related to a trademark. In addition, in fiscal
2016, the Company's two corporate airplanes met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and as such were
written down to their estimate fair value less costs to sell. This resulted in an impairment charge of $5.7 million.

Merger Termination Fee Net of Merger-related Costs
In September 2015, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Media General, Inc. This agreement was
terminated in January 2016. In exchange for terminating the merger agreement, the Company received $60.0
million of cash, which was partially offset by $16.5 million in merger-related expenses.

Operating Expenses
Employee compensation including benefits was the largest component of our operating expenses in fiscal 2017.
Employee compensation represented 34 percent of total operating expenses in fiscal 2017, compared to 31 percent
in fiscal 2016, and 34 percent in fiscal 2015. National media paper, production, and postage combined expense was
the second largest component of our operating costs in fiscal 2017, representing 18 percent of the total. In fiscal
2016, these expenses represented 18 percent and in fiscal 2015, they were 20 percent. In fiscal 2016, the impairment
of goodwill and other long-lived assets was the third largest component representing 11 percent of total operating
expenses. Absent the impairment charges, employee compensation including benefits represented 34 percent and
national media paper, production, and postage combined expense represented 20 percent of total operating costs.

Income from Operations

Income from operations increased 137 percent in fiscal 2017 primarily due to the non-cash impairment charges of
$161.5 million recorded in fiscal 2016. Absent the impairment charges, income from operations increased 6 percent
in fiscal 2017 primarily due to higher operating profits in our local media segment of $59.5 million, a reduction of
$16.5 million in merger-related expenses, and an increase in the reduction of previously accrued contingent
consideration payable of $15.3 million partially offset by the absence of the $60.0 million received by the Company
in fiscal 2016 in conjunction with the termination of the merger agreement.

Income from operations decreased 46 percent in fiscal 2016 primarily due to the non-cash impairment charges of
$161.5 million described above, merger-related expenses of $16.5 million, lower operating profits before
acquisitions in our local media segment of $16.4 million due primarily to the cyclical nature of political revenues,
and a decline in MXM's operating results of $4.2 million. Partially offsetting these decreases were the receipt of
merger related fees of $60.0 million, incremental operating profit from acquisitions of $24.2 million, and the
reduction in the severance and benefits accrual of $4.9 million.

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense was $18.8 million in fiscal 2017, $20.4 million in fiscal 2016, and $19.4 million in fiscal 2015.
Average long-term debt outstanding was $678.1 million in fiscal 2017, $766.4 million in fiscal 2016, and $780.3
million in fiscal 2015. The Company's approximate weighted average interest rate was 2.8 percent in fiscal 2017,
2.7 percent in fiscal 2016, and 2.5 percent in fiscal 2015. The weighted average interest rates include the effects of
derivative financial instruments.

Income Taxes

The Company's effective tax rate was 34.9 percent in fiscal 2017, 69.2 percent in fiscal 2016, and 38.6 percent in
fiscal 2015. The fiscal 2017 effective tax rate was primarily impacted by a credit to income taxes of $6.7 million
related to the resolution of certain federal and state tax matters recorded in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2016, the Company
recorded an impairment of goodwill of $116.9 million, of which approximately 20 percent was deductible for
income tax purposes.

Net Earnings and Earnings per Share

Net earnings were $188.9 million ($4.16 per diluted share) in fiscal 2017, up 457 percent from $33.9 million ($0.75
per diluted share) in fiscal 2016, primarily due to the increase in political advertising and retransmission consent
revenues, the reduction in previously accrued contingent consideration payable, and the credit to income taxes.
Prior-year earnings per share was impacted by the goodwill and trademark impairments recorded by the Company
in fiscal 2016. Both average basic and diluted shares outstanding increased slightly.

Net earnings were $33.9 million ($0.75 per diluted share) in fiscal 2016, down 75 percent from $136.8 million
($3.02 per diluted share) in fiscal 2015. The decrease in net earnings was primarily due to the impairment charges
and a higher effective tax rate due to the limited tax deductibility of the goodwill impairment. Both average basic
and diluted shares outstanding increased slightly.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities ..................... $ 219.3
(117.7)
Cash flows from investing activities .....................
(104.3)
Cash flows from financing activities .....................
(2.7)
Net cash flows ....................................................... $
22.3
Cash and cash equivalents ..................................... $
700.6
Total long-term debt ..............................................
996.0
Shareholders' equity...............................................
41%
Debt to total capitalization.....................................

$ 226.6
(31.5)
(193.0)
2.1
25.0
695.0
889.0
44%

$
$

$ 192.3
(206.8)
0.7
$ (13.8)
22.8
$
795.0
951.9
46%

OVERVIEW

Meredith's primary source of liquidity is cash generated by operating activities. Debt financing is typically used for
significant acquisitions. Our core businesses—television broadcasting and magazine advertising—have been strong
cash generators. Despite the introduction of many new technologies, we believe these businesses will continue to
have strong market appeal for the foreseeable future. As is true in any business, changes in the level of demand for
magazine and television advertising or our other products as well as changes in costs can have a significant effect
on operating results and cash flows.

Historically, Meredith has been able to absorb normal business downturns without significant increases in debt and
management believes the Company will continue to do so. We expect cash on hand, internally generated cash flow,
and available credit from financing agreements will provide adequate funds for operating and recurring cash needs
(e.g., working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayments, and cash dividends) into the foreseeable future. At
June 30, 2017, we had up to $115.0 million available under our revolving credit facility and up to $25.0 million

available under our asset-backed bank facility (depending on levels of accounts receivable). While there are no
guarantees that we will be able to replace current credit agreements when they expire, we expect to be able to do so.

SOURCES AND USES OF CASH

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $2.7 million in fiscal 2017; they increased $2.1 million in fiscal 2016 and
decreased $13.8 million in fiscal 2015. Over the three-year period, net cash provided by operating activities was
used for acquisitions, debt repayments, dividends, stock repurchases, and capital investments.

Operating Activities

The largest single component of operating cash inflows is cash received from advertising customers. Advertising
accounted for more than 50 percent of total revenues in each of the past three fiscal years. Other sources of
operating cash inflows include cash received from magazine circulation sales and other revenue transactions such as
retransmission consent fees, customer relationship marketing, brand licensing, and product sales. Operating cash
outflows include payments to vendors and employees and payments of interest and income taxes. Our most
significant vendor payments are for production and delivery of publications and promotional mailings, network
programming fees, employee benefits (including pension plans), broadcast programming rights, and other services
and supplies.

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $219.3 million in fiscal 2017 compared with $226.6 million in fiscal
2016. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the receipt, in fiscal 2016, of a net
$43.5 million reflecting the merger termination fee less merger-related expenses. This onetime receipt of cash is
included in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2016.

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $226.6 million in fiscal 2016 compared with $192.3 million in fiscal
2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to increased net earnings (excluding the
impact of non-cash impairment charges). The increase in net earnings reflects the merger termination fee less
merger-related expenses and associated taxes.

Changes in the Company's cash contributions to qualified defined benefit pension plans can have a significant effect
on cash provided by operations. During fiscal 2017, we contributed $10.0 million to the defined benefit pension
plans. During fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, we made a $5.0 million contribution in each fiscal year. We do not
anticipate a required contribution in fiscal 2018.

Investing Activities

Investing cash inflows generally include proceeds from the sale of assets or a business. Investing cash outflows
generally include payments for the acquisition of new businesses; investments; and additions to property, plant, and
equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities rose to $117.7 million in fiscal 2017 from $31.5 million in fiscal 2016
primarily due to increased cash outflows for acquisitions of businesses in the current year.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $31.5 million in fiscal 2016 compared to $206.8 million in fiscal
2015 primarily due to fewer acquisitions of businesses in fiscal 2016.

Financing Activities

Financing cash inflows generally include borrowings under debt agreements and proceeds from the exercise of
common stock options issued under share-based compensation plans. Financing cash outflows generally include the

repayment of long-term debt, repurchases of Company stock, the payment of dividends, and the payment of
acquisition-related contingent consideration.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $104.3 million in fiscal 2017, compared with $193.0 million in the
prior year. The change in cash flows from financing activities is primarily due to a net $5.6 million of debt
issuances in the current year compared to a net $100.0 million of debt being paid down in the prior year.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $193.0 million in fiscal 2016, compared with net cash provided by
financing activities of $0.7 million in fiscal 2015. The change in cash flows from financing activities is primarily
due to a net $100.0 million of debt being paid down in fiscal 2016 compared to a net $80.0 million of debt
issuances in fiscal 2015.

Long-term Debt

At June 30, 2017, total long-term debt outstanding was $700.6 million ($240.6 million under a term loan, $250.0
million in floating-rate unsecured senior notes, $50.0 million in fixed-rate unsecured senior notes, $75.0 million
under an asset-backed bank facility, and $85.0 million outstanding under a revolving credit facility).

During fiscal 2015, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable interest rate risk on
the $250.0 million floating-rate senior notes and on $50.0 million of the term loan. The expiration of the swaps is as
follows: $50.0 million in August 2018, $100.0 million in March 2019, and $150.0 million in August 2019. Under
the swaps the Company will pay fixed rates of interest (1.36 percent on the swap maturing in August 2018, 1.53
percent on the swap maturing in March 2019, and 1.76 percent on the swaps maturing in August 2019) and receive
variable rates of interest based on the one to three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (1.21 percent on
the swap maturing in August 2018, 1.28 percent on the swap maturing in March 2019, and 1.20 percent on the
swaps maturing in August 2019 as of June 30, 2017) on the $300.0 million notional amount of indebtedness.

During fiscal 2017, Meredith amended and restated its credit agreement that provides a revolving credit facility of
$200.0 million and a term loan facility of $250.0 million, which now expires on November 30, 2021. Other than
extending the expiration date, the terms of the amended and restated credit agreement are substantially the same as
those previously in place. The amended and restated credit agreement replaced our prior revolving credit facility
and term loan. The interest rate under both the revolving credit facility and the term loan is variable based on
LIBOR and Meredith's debt to trailing 12 month EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization as defined in the debt agreement) ratio. As of June 30, 2017, the weighted average interest rate was
2.49 percent for the revolving credit facility and term loan, after taking into account the effect of outstanding
interest rate swap agreements. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments based on an amortization schedule
as set forth in the agreement. At June 30, 2017, $240.6 million was outstanding under the term loan and $85.0
million was outstanding under the revolver. Of the term loan, $12.5 million is due in the next 12 months. We expect
to repay this with cash from operations and credit available under existing credit agreements.

The floating-rate unsecured senior notes are due in December 2022 and February 2024. The weighted average
effective interest rate for $150.0 million of the floating-rate unsecured senior notes was 3.26 percent at June 30,
2017, after taking into account the effect of outstanding interest rate swap agreements. The weighted average
effective interest rate for $100.0 million of the floating-rate unsecured senior notes was 3.03 percent at June 30,
2017, after taking into account the effect of the outstanding interest rate swap agreement. None of the floating-rate
senior notes are due in the next 12 months.

The $50.0 million fixed-rate senior note, which carries an interest rate of 3.04 percent, is due on March 1, 2018. We
expect to repay this senior note with cash from operations and credit available under existing credit agreements.

In connection with the asset-backed bank facility, we entered into a revolving agreement. Under this agreement, we
currently sell all of our rights, title, and interest in the majority of our accounts receivable related to advertising and
miscellaneous revenues to Meredith Funding Corporation, a special-purpose entity established to purchase accounts

receivable from Meredith. At June 30, 2017, $179.6 million of accounts receivable net of reserves were outstanding
under the agreement. Meredith Funding Corporation in turn sells receivable interests to a major national bank. In
consideration of the sale, Meredith receives cash and a subordinated note that bears interest at the prime rate, 4.25
percent at June 30, 2017, from Meredith Funding Corporation. As of June 30, 2017, the asset-backed bank facility
had a capacity of up to $100.0 million (depending on levels of accounts receivable). The interest rate on the asset-
backed bank facility is variable based on LIBOR plus a fixed spread. The interest rate was 2.08 percent as of
June 30, 2017. The current term of the asset-backed bank facility ends in October 2017. We expect to renew this
facility on or before its expiration date under substantially similar terms or refinance it with available borrowing
capacity.

We believe our debt agreements are material to discussions of Meredith's liquidity. All of our debt agreements
include financial covenants, and failure to comply with any such covenants could result in the debt becoming
payable on demand. A summary of the most significant financial covenants and their status at June 30, 2017, is as
follows:

Ratio of debt to trailing 12 month EBITDA1 ..........
Less than 3.75
Ratio of EBITDA1 to interest expense .................... Greater than 2.75

1.93

19.30

1 EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization as defined in the debt agreements.

Required at
June 30, 2017

Actual at
June 30, 2017

The Company was in compliance with these and all other financial covenants at June 30, 2017.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our principal contractual obligations as of June 30, 2017:

Contractual obligations

(In millions)
Total long-term debt
Debt interest 1

Broadcast rights and network programming
Contingent consideration 2
Operating leases
Purchase obligations and other 3

Payments Due by Period

Total

Less than
1 Year

700.6

73.0

484.5

35.9

134.6

32.7

62.5

15.4

173.0

4.0

18.4

17.8

1-3
Years

46.8

26.3

288.3

27.2

33.4

8.9

4-5
Years

After 5
Years

341.3

250.0

21.8

20.4

4.7

27.4

2.4

9.5

2.8

—

55.4

3.6

Total contractual cash obligations

$ 1,461.3

291.1

430.9

418.0

321.3

1 Debt interest represents semi-annual interest payments due on fixed-rate senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2017, and estimated

interest payments on variable-rate term loan and variable-rate private placement senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2017. Interest
payments on variable-rate debt is estimated using the effective interest rate including projected payments related to interest rate swaps
as of June 30, 2017.

2 While it is not certain if or when these contingent acquisition payments will be made, we have included the payments in the table based

on our best estimates of the amounts and dates when the contingencies may be resolved.

3 Purchase obligations and other includes expected postretirement benefit payments.

Due to uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with unrecognized tax benefits at
June 30, 2017, the Company is unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement.

Therefore, $22.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table
above. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of income taxes.

Purchase obligations represent legally binding agreements to purchase goods and services that specify all significant
terms. Outstanding purchase orders, which represent authorizations to purchase goods and services but are not
legally binding, are not included in purchase obligations. We believe current cash balances, cash generated by future
operating activities, and cash available under current credit agreements will be sufficient to meet our contractual
cash obligations and other operating cash requirements for the foreseeable future. Projections of future cash flows
are, however, subject to substantial uncertainty as discussed throughout MD&A and particularly in Item 1A-Risk
Factors beginning on page 11. Debt agreements may be renewed or refinanced if we determine it is advantageous to
do so. We also have commitments in the form of standby letters of credit totaling $1.2 million that expire within one
year.

Share Repurchase Program

We have maintained a program of Company share repurchases for 29 years. In fiscal 2017, we spent $53.4 million
to repurchase an aggregate of 941,000 shares of Meredith Corporation common and Class B stock at then current
market prices. We spent $31.1 million to repurchase an aggregate of 651,000 shares in fiscal 2016 and $46.8 million
to repurchase an aggregate of 924,000 shares in fiscal 2015. We expect to continue repurchasing shares from time to
time subject to market conditions. In May 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100.0
million in additional shares of the Company's stock through public and private transactions. As of June 30, 2017,
$68.0 million remained available under the current authorizations for future repurchases. The status of the
repurchase program is reviewed at each quarterly Board of Directors meeting. See Item 5-Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities of this Form 10-K for detailed information on share repurchases during the quarter ended June 30,
2017.

Dividends

Meredith has paid quarterly dividends continuously since 1947 and we have increased our dividend annually for 24
consecutive years. The last increase occurred in January 2017 when the Board of Directors approved the quarterly
dividend of 52.00 cents per share effective with the dividend payable in March 2017. Given the current number of
shares outstanding, the increase will result in additional dividend payments of approximately $4.5 million annually.
Dividend payments totaled $91.9 million, or $2.030 per share, in fiscal 2017 compared with $86.1 million, or
$1.905 per share, in fiscal 2016, and $80.0 million, or $1.780 per share, in fiscal 2015.

Capital Expenditures

Spending for property, plant, and equipment totaled $34.8 million in fiscal 2017, $25.0 million in fiscal 2016, and
$33.2 million in fiscal 2015. Spending for all fiscal years primarily related to assets acquired in the normal course
of business. The Company has a $14.1 million commitment to purchase a corporate airplane in fiscal 2018. We have
no other material commitments for capital expenditures. We expect funds for future capital expenditures to come
from operating activities or, if necessary, borrowings under credit agreements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Meredith's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Some of these estimates and assumptions are inherently difficult to make and subjective in
nature. We base our estimates on historical experience, recent trends, our expectations for future performance, and

other assumptions as appropriate. We reevaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis; actual results, however, may
vary from these estimates.

The following are the accounting policies that management believes are most critical to the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements and require management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments. In
addition, there are other items within the consolidated financial statements that require estimation but are not
deemed to be critical accounting policies. Changes in the estimates used in these and other items could have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company has a significant amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets that are reviewed at least
annually for impairment. At June 30, 2017, goodwill and intangible assets totaled $1.9 billion, or 68 percent of
Meredith's total assets, with $1.0 billion in the national media segment and $0.9 billion in the local media segment.
The impairment analysis of these assets is considered critical because of their significance to the Company and our
local media and national media segments.

Management is required to evaluate goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment on an annual
basis or when events occur or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying value exceeds the fair value. In
reviewing goodwill for impairment, the Company may first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is
more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.

Fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model which requires us to estimate the future cash flows
expected to be generated by the reporting unit or to result from the use of the assets. These estimates depend upon
assumptions about future revenues (including projections of overall market growth and our share of market),
estimated costs, and appropriate discount rates where applicable. Our assumptions are based on historical data,
various internal estimates, and a variety of external sources and are consistent with the assumptions used in both our
short-term financial forecasts and long-term strategic plans. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used,
future cash flow projections can vary within a range of outcomes. Changes in key assumptions about the local
media and national media businesses and their prospects or changes in market conditions could result in an
impairment charge. See Item 1A.-Risk Factors for other factors which could affect our assumptions.

As of May 31, 2017, the date that management last performed our annual review of impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets, there were no qualitative factors that indicated that a quantitative impairment analysis was needed
for the local media reporting unit. At May 31, 2017, management elected to perform the quantitative goodwill
impairment test for the magazine brands reporting unit and the MXM reporting unit. The first step of this test is to
compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. In reviewing other indefinite-lived intangible assets
for impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the asset to the asset’s carrying value. The fair value of the
magazine brands reporting unit exceeded its net assets by more than 30 percent and the MXM reporting unit
exceeded its net assets by nearly 80 percent.

In fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $5.3 million to write-off the national
media segment's Mywedding trademark. In fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment
charge of $116.9 million to reduce the carrying value of MXM's goodwill. Additionally, in fiscal 2016, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $38.9 million on the national media segment's American Baby
trademark. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

BROADCAST RIGHTS

Broadcast rights, which consist primarily of rights to broadcast syndicated programs and feature films, are recorded
at cost when the programs become available for airing. Amortization of broadcast rights is generally recorded on an

accelerated basis over the contract period. Broadcast rights valued at $29.7 million were included in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2017. In addition, we had entered into contracts valued at $21.7 million not
included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2017, because the related programming was not yet
available for airing.

Broadcast rights are valued at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. The determination of net
realizable value requires us to estimate future net revenues expected to be earned as a result of airing the
programming. Future revenues can be affected by changes in the level of advertising demand, competition from
other television stations or other media, changes in television programming ratings, changes in the planned usage of
programming materials, and other factors. Changes in such key assumptions could result in an impairment charge.

PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS

Meredith has noncontributory pension plans covering substantially all employees. These plans include qualified
(funded) plans as well as nonqualified (unfunded) plans. These plans provide participating employees with
retirement benefits in accordance with benefit provision formulas. The nonqualified plans provide retirement
benefits only to certain highly compensated employees. Meredith also sponsors defined healthcare and life
insurance plans that provide benefits to eligible retirees.

The accounting for pension and postretirement plans is actuarially based and includes assumptions regarding
expected returns on plan assets, discount rates, and the rate of increase in healthcare costs. We consider the
accounting for pension and postretirement plans critical to Meredith and both of our segments because of the
number of significant judgments required. More information on our assumptions and our methodology in arriving at
these assumptions can be found in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements. Changes in key assumptions
could materially affect the associated assets, liabilities, and benefit expenses. Depending on the assumptions and
estimates used, these balances could vary within a range of outcomes. We monitor trends in the marketplace and
rely on guidance from employee benefit specialists to arrive at reasonable estimates. These estimates are reviewed
annually and updated as needed. Nevertheless, the estimates are subjective and may vary from actual results.

Meredith will use a long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0 percent in developing fiscal 2018 pension costs,
the same as used in fiscal 2017. The fiscal 2017 rate was based on various factors that include but are not limited to
the plans' asset allocations, a review of historical capital market performance, historical plan performance, current
market factors such as inflation and interest rates, and a forecast of expected future asset returns. The pension plan
assets earned 15.4 percent in fiscal 2017 and 1.0 percent in fiscal 2016. If we had decreased our expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets by 0.5 percent in fiscal 2017, our pension expense would have increased by
$0.7 million.

Meredith will use a weighted average discount rate of 3.41 percent in developing the fiscal 2018 pension costs, up
from a rate of 2.98 percent used in fiscal 2017. If we had decreased the discount rate by 0.5 percent in fiscal 2017,
our pension expense would have increased by $0.6 million.

Assumed rates of increase in healthcare cost levels have a significant effect on postretirement benefit costs. A one-
percentage-point increase in the assumed healthcare cost trend rate would have resulted in an increase of $0.4
million in the postretirement benefit obligation at June 30, 2017, and no increase in the aggregate service and
interest cost components of fiscal 2017 expense.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE

Meredith has a stock incentive plan that permits us to grant various types of share-based incentives to key
employees and directors. The primary types of incentives granted under the plan are stock options and restricted
stock units. Share-based compensation expense totaled $12.7 million in fiscal 2017. As of June 30, 2017, unearned

compensation cost was $5.3 million for restricted stock units, $2.1 million for stock options, and $0.1 million for
restricted stock. These costs will be recognized over weighted average periods of 1.5 years, 1.4 years, and 0.9 years,
respectively.

Restricted shares and units are valued at the market value of traded shares on the date of grant. The valuation of
stock options requires numerous assumptions. We determine the fair value of each option as of the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires inputs for the expected volatility of our stock
price, expected life of the option, and expected dividend yield, among others. We base our assumptions on historical
data, expected market conditions, and other factors. In some instances, a range of assumptions is used to reflect
differences in behavior among various groups of employees. In addition, we estimate the number of options and
restricted stock units expected to eventually vest. This is based primarily on past experience.

We consider the accounting for share-based compensation expense critical to Meredith and both of our segments
because of the number of significant judgments required. More information on our assumptions can be found in
Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. Changes in these assumptions could materially affect the share-
based compensation expense recognized as well as various liability and equity balances.

INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are recorded for the amount of taxes payable for the current year and include deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the effect of temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense was 34.9 percent of earnings
before income taxes in fiscal 2017. Net deferred tax liabilities totaled $384.7 million, or 22 percent of total
liabilities, at June 30, 2017.

We consider accounting for income taxes critical to our operations because management is required to make
significant subjective judgments in developing our provision for income taxes, including the determination of
deferred tax assets and liabilities, any valuation allowances that may be required against deferred tax assets, and
reserves for uncertain tax positions.

The Company operates in numerous taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in each of these jurisdictions. These
audits can involve complex issues that tend to require an extended period of time to resolve and may eventually
result in an increase or decrease to amounts previously paid to the taxing jurisdictions. Any such audits are not
expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS

ADOPTED OR PENDING ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

There were no new accounting pronouncements issued or effective during the fiscal year which have had or are
expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2018. See Note 1
to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting
standards and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Meredith is exposed to certain market risks as a result of our use of financial instruments, in particular the potential
market value loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. The Company does not utilize financial instruments
for trading purposes and does not hold any derivative financial instruments that could expose the Company to
significant market risk. There have been no significant changes in the market risk exposures since June 30, 2016.

Interest Rates

We generally manage our risk associated with interest rate movements through the use of a combination of variable
and fixed-rate debt. At June 30, 2017, Meredith had $50.0 million outstanding in fixed-rate, long-term debt. In
addition, Meredith has effectively converted the $250.0 million floating-rate senior notes and $50.0 million of the
term loan to fixed-rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps. Since the interest rate swaps hedge the variability
of interest payments on variable-rate debt with the same terms, they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting
treatment. There are no earnings or liquidity risks associated with the Company's fixed-rate debt. The fair value of
the fixed-rate debt (based on discounted cash flows reflecting borrowing rates currently available for debt with
similar terms and maturities) varies with fluctuations in interest rates. A 10 percent decrease in interest rates would
have changed the fair value of the fixed-rate debt to $50.2 million from $50.1 million at June 30, 2017.

At June 30, 2017, $650.6 million of our debt was variable-rate debt before consideration of the impact of the swaps.
The Company is subject to earnings and liquidity risks for changes in the interest rate on the portion of this debt that
is not hedged by interest rate swaps. A 10 percent increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense
by $1.0 million.

The fair value of the interest rate swaps is the estimated amount, based on discounted cash flows, the Company
would pay or receive to terminate the swap agreements. We intend to continue to meet the conditions for cash flow
hedge accounting. However, if hedges were not highly effective in offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged
risk, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges could have an impact on our consolidated net
earnings.

Broadcast Rights Payable

The Company enters into broadcast rights contracts for our television stations. As a rule, these contracts are on a
market-by-market basis and subject to terms and conditions of the seller of the broadcast rights. These procured
rights generally are sold to the highest bidder in each market, and the process is very competitive. There are no
earnings or liquidity risks associated with broadcast rights payable. Fair values are determined using discounted
cash flows. At June 30, 2017, a 10 percent decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a $0.2 million increase
in the fair value of the available broadcast rights payable and the unavailable broadcast rights commitments.

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ..................................................................................

Report of Management ..........................................................................................................................................

Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 ...........................
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 ...
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 ........
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.......................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ...................................................................................................

45
47
48
49
50
52

Five-Year Financial History with Selected Financial Data....................................................................................

Financial Statement Schedule

Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts .............................................................................................

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Meredith Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Meredith Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive
income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2017. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the consolidated financial
statement schedule, Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. We also have audited the Company's internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Item 9A (Controls and Procedures). Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on
the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Meredith Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2017, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material

respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).

Des Moines, Iowa
August 29, 2017

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets

Assets
(In thousands)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................... $

June 30,

2017

2016

22,287

24,970

289,052
21,890
144,896
7,853
19,275
505,253

Accounts receivable
(net of allowances of $7,975 in 2017 and $8,331 in 2016)....................................
Inventories...................................................................................................................
Current portion of subscription acquisition costs .......................................................
Current portion of broadcast rights .............................................................................
Other current assets.....................................................................................................
Total current assets ...................................................................................................
Property, plant, and equipment
24,725
Land ............................................................................................................................
153,680
Buildings and improvements ......................................................................................
355,087
Machinery and equipment...........................................................................................
14,349
Leasehold improvements ............................................................................................
1,695
Construction in progress .............................................................................................
549,536
Total property, plant, and equipment ..........................................................................
(359,670)
Less accumulated depreciation ...................................................................................
189,866
Net property, plant, and equipment ........................................................................
79,740
Subscription acquisition costs.....................................................................................
21,807
Broadcast rights ..........................................................................................................
69,616
Other assets .................................................................................................................
955,883
Intangible assets, net ...................................................................................................
907,458
Goodwill .....................................................................................................................
Total assets ................................................................................................................. $ 2,729,623

273,927
20,678
133,338
4,220
24,023
481,156

24,697
149,950
332,314
14,317
8,774
530,052
(339,099)
190,953
95,960
4,565
57,151
913,877
883,129
$ 2,626,791

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands except per share data)
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt .............................................................................. $
Current portion of long-term broadcast rights payable ..............................................
Accounts payable .......................................................................................................
Accrued expenses

Compensation and benefits ....................................................................................
Distribution expenses.............................................................................................
Other taxes and expenses .......................................................................................
Total accrued expenses ..........................................................................................
Current portion of unearned subscription revenues ...................................................
Total current liabilities.............................................................................................
Long-term debt...........................................................................................................
Long-term broadcast rights payable...........................................................................
Unearned subscription revenues.................................................................................
Deferred income taxes................................................................................................
Other noncurrent liabilities.........................................................................................
Total liabilities...........................................................................................................
Shareholders' equity
Series preferred stock, par value $1 per share

62,500
9,206
66,598

75,000
4,649
82,107

68,988
5,271
42,648
116,907
204,459
459,670
635,737
22,454
106,506
384,726
124,558
1,733,651

71,135
10,779
34,863
116,777
199,359
477,892
618,506
5,524
128,534
336,346
170,946
1,737,748

Authorized 5,000 shares; none issued....................................................................

—

Common stock, par value $1 per share

Authorized 80,000 shares; issued and outstanding 39,433 shares in 2017
(excluding 24,754 treasury shares) and 39,272 shares in 2016 (excluding
24,607 treasury shares) ..........................................................................................

Class B stock, par value $1 per share, convertible to common stock

39,433

39,272

Authorized 15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,119 shares in 2017 and
5,119
5,284 shares in 2016 ..............................................................................................
54,726
Additional paid-in capital...........................................................................................
915,703
Retained earnings .......................................................................................................
(19,009)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss.....................................................................
995,972
Total shareholders' equity .......................................................................................
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity ............................................................... $ 2,729,623

5,284
54,282
818,706
(28,501)
889,043
$ 2,626,791

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

934,153
321,959
457,249
1,713,361

914,202
328,599
406,827
1,649,628

896,548
313,685
383,943
1,594,176

(In thousands except per share data)
Revenues
Advertising ......................................................................................... $
Circulation ..........................................................................................
All other..............................................................................................
Total revenues ..............................................................................

Operating expenses
Production, distribution, and editorial ................................................
Selling, general, and administrative ...................................................
Depreciation and amortization............................................................
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ..........................
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs............................
Total operating expenses ..............................................................
Income from operations ...................................................................
Interest expense, net ...........................................................................
Earnings before income taxes.............................................................
Income taxes .......................................................................................
Net earnings....................................................................................... $

602,985
741,188
53,892
6,173
—
1,404,238
309,123
(18,789)
290,334
(101,406)
188,928

Basic earnings per share .................................................................. $
Basic average shares outstanding .......................................................

4.23
44,617

Diluted earnings per share ............................................................... $
Diluted average shares outstanding ....................................................

4.16
45,447

611,872
730,074
59,152
161,462
(43,541)
1,519,019
130,609
(20,402)
110,207
(76,270)
33,937

0.76
44,606

0.75
45,357

598,941
695,319
56,546
1,258
—
1,352,064
242,112
(19,352)
222,760
(85,969)
136,791

3.07
44,522

3.02
45,323

Dividends paid per share .................................................................... $

2.030

1.905

1.780

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)
Net earnings ........................................................................................ $
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans activity .....................
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps .....................................
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes ............
Comprehensive income .................................................................... $

188,928

33,937

136,791

5,327
4,165
9,492
198,420

(12,752)
(3,101)
(15,853)
18,084

(2,591)
(1,299)
(3,890)
132,901

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity

Common
Stock - $1
(In thousands except per share data)
par value
Balance at June 30, 2014 ......................... $ 36,776
—
Net earnings ...............................................
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax.........
—
Stock issued under various incentive
plans, net of forfeitures ..............................
Purchases of Company stock .....................
Share-based compensation.........................
Conversion of class B to common stock....
Dividends paid, $1.780 per share

1,069
(924)
—
736

Common stock ....................................
Class B stock.......................................
Tax benefit from incentive plans................
Balance at June 30, 2015 .........................
Net earnings ...............................................
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax.........
Stock issued under various incentive
plans, net of forfeitures ..............................
Purchases of Company stock .....................
Share-based compensation.........................
Conversion of class B to common stock....
Dividends paid, $1.905 per share

Common stock ....................................
Class B stock.......................................
Tax benefit from incentive plans................
Balance at June 30, 2016 .........................
Net earnings ...............................................
Other comprehensive income, net of tax ...
Stock issued under various incentive
plans, net of forfeitures ..............................
Purchases of Company stock .....................
Share-based compensation.........................
Conversion of class B to common stock....
Dividends paid, $2.030 per share

Common stock ......................................
Class B stock .........................................
Tax benefit from incentive plans................

Class B
Stock - $1
par value
7,700
$
—
—

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

41,884

Retained
Earnings
$ 814,050
— 136,791
—
—

—
—
—
—

(67,276)
(12,706)
—
870,859
33,937
—

—
—
—
—

—
(1)
—
(736)

—
—
—
6,963

40,182
(45,839)
12,515
—

—
—
277
49,019

—
—
—
37,657

—

587
(648)
—
1,676

—
—
—
39,272
—
—

937
(941)
—
165

—
—
—

—
(3)
—
(1,676)

—
—
—
5,284
—
—

—
—
—
(165)

—
—
—

20,292
(30,429)
12,757
—

—
—
2,643
54,282

(72,874)
(13,216)
—
818,706
— 188,928
—
—

37,124
(52,458)
12,737
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
3,041

(81,419)
(10,512)
—

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(8,758)
$
—
(3,890)

Total
$ 891,652
136,791
(3,890)

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
(12,648)
—
(15,853)

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
(28,501)
—
9,492

—
—
—
—

—
—
—

41,251
(46,764)
12,515
—

(67,276)
(12,706)
277
951,850
33,937
(15,853)

20,879
(31,080)
12,757
—

(72,874)
(13,216)
2,643
889,043
188,928
9,492

38,061
(53,399)
12,737
—

(81,419)
(10,512)
3,041

Balance at June 30, 2017 ......................... $ 39,433

5,119

54,726

$ 915,703

(19,009)

$ 995,972

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended June 30,
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings ................................................................................................. $ 188,928
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided
by operating activities

2017

2016

2015

33,937

$ 136,791

Depreciation ..........................................................................................
Amortization..........................................................................................
Share-based compensation ....................................................................
Deferred income taxes ...........................................................................
Amortization of broadcast rights ...........................................................
Payments for broadcast rights ...............................................................
Write-down of impaired assets ..............................................................
Fair value adjustment to contingent consideration ................................
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments ...................................
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions/dispositions

Accounts receivable ........................................................................
Inventories.......................................................................................
Other current assets.........................................................................
Subscription acquisition costs.........................................................
Other assets .....................................................................................
Accounts payable ............................................................................
Accrued expenses and other liabilities............................................
Unearned subscription revenues .....................................................
Other noncurrent liabilities .............................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities ....................................................
Cash flows from investing activities

Acquisitions of and investments in businesses......................................
Additions to property, plant, and equipment .........................................
Proceeds from disposition of assets.......................................................
Net cash used in investing activities ............................................................
Cash flows from financing activities

34,770
19,122
12,737
42,463
17,580
(17,028)
9,751
(19,520)
(6,765)

(15,125)
(1,218)
4,748
4,662
(2,070)
(15,509)
8,390
(16,928)
(29,642)
219,346

(84,400)
(34,785)
1,500
(117,685)

39,430
19,722
12,757
9,094
16,735
(16,865)
161,997
(4,104)
(4,241)

10,718
3,468
(518)
(3,106)
4,906
(11,892)
(16,638)
(31,272)
2,469
226,597

(8,186)
(25,035)
1,767
(31,454)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt ............................................
Repayments of long-term debt ..............................................................
Dividends paid.......................................................................................
Purchases of Company stock.................................................................
Proceeds from common stock issued ....................................................
Payment of acquisition-related contingent consideration......................
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments ...................................
Other ......................................................................................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .....................................
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ..................................
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ..........................................
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ................................................ $

380,000
(374,375)
(91,931)
(53,399)
38,061
(8,000)
6,765
(1,465)
(104,344)
(2,683)
24,970
22,287

167,500
(267,500)
(86,090)
(31,080)
20,879
(800)
4,241
(156)
(193,006)
2,137
22,833
24,970

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

38,918
17,628
12,515
47,220
16,576
(16,364)
3,142
(1,500)
(6,471)

(18,991)
(1,013)
(6,501)
(27,766)
(391)
10,040
13,866
(19,093)
(6,259)
192,347

(257,030)
(33,245)
83,434
(206,841)

470,000
(390,000)
(79,982)
(46,764)
41,251
—
6,471
(236)
740
(13,754)
36,587
$ 22,833

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

Years ended June 30,
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid

2017

2016

2015

Interest ............................................................................................ $
Income taxes ...................................................................................

22,045
73,145

20,235
72,979

19,111
40,419

Non-cash transactions

Broadcast rights financed by contracts payable .............................

15,396

19,264

15,300

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations—Meredith Corporation (Meredith or the Company) is a diversified media company. The
Company has two reporting segments: local media and national media. The Company's local media segment
includes 17 television stations and related digital and mobile media operations. The national media segment
includes print magazines, digital and mobile media, brand licensing activities, database-related activities, business-
to-business marketing products and services, and other related operations. Meredith's operations are primarily
diversified geographically within the United States (U.S.) and the Company has a broad customer base.

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Meredith Corporation
and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. Meredith
does not have any off-balance sheet financing activities. The Company's use of special-purpose entities is limited to
Meredith Funding Corporation, whose activities are fully consolidated in Meredith's consolidated financial
statements (See Note 6).

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience, management expectations for future performance, and other assumptions as appropriate. Key areas
affected by estimates include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, including goodwill and other
intangible assets, which is based on such factors as estimated future cash flows; the determination of the net
realizable value of broadcast rights, which is based on estimated future revenues; provisions for returns of
magazines sold, which are based on historical experience and current marketplace conditions; pension and
postretirement benefit expenses, which are actuarially determined and include assumptions regarding discount rates,
expected returns on plan assets, and rates of increase in compensation and healthcare costs; and share-based
compensation expense, which is based on numerous assumptions including future stock price volatility and
employees' expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. While the Company re-evaluates
its estimates on an ongoing basis, actual results may vary from those estimates.

Reclassifications—Certain prior years' amounts have been reclassified to conform to fiscal 2017 presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less are
considered to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair
value.

Accounts Receivable—The Company's accounts receivable are primarily due from advertisers. Credit is extended
to clients based on an evaluation of each client's creditworthiness and financial condition; collateral is not required.
The Company maintains allowances for uncollectible accounts, rebates, rate adjustments, returns, and discounts.
The allowance for uncollectible accounts is based on the aging of such receivables and any known specific
collectability exposures. Accounts are written off when deemed uncollectible. Allowances for rebates, rate
adjustments, returns, and discounts are generally based on historical experience and current market conditions.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally limited due to the large number of
geographically diverse clients and individually small balances.

Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the last-in first-out (LIFO)
basis for paper and on the first-in first-out or average basis for all other inventories.

Subscription Acquisition Costs—Subscription acquisition costs primarily represent magazine agency
commissions. These costs are deferred and amortized over the related subscription term, typically one to two years.
In addition, direct-response advertising costs that are intended to solicit subscriptions and are expected to result in

probable future benefits are capitalized. These costs are amortized over the period during which future benefits are
expected to be received. The asset balance of the capitalized direct-response advertising costs is reviewed quarterly
to ensure the amount is realizable. Any write-downs resulting from this review are expensed as subscription
acquisition advertising costs in the current period. Capitalized direct-response advertising costs were $6.0 million at
June 30, 2017 and $5.5 million at June 30, 2016. There were no material write-downs of capitalized direct-response
advertising costs in any of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2017.

Property, Plant, and Equipment—Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Costs of replacements and
major improvements are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
Depreciation expense is provided primarily by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets: 5-45 years for buildings and improvements and 3-20 years for machinery and equipment. The costs of
leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful lives or the terms of the respective leases.
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant, and equipment was $34.8 million in fiscal 2017, $39.4 million in
fiscal 2016, and $38.9 million in fiscal 2015.

In fiscal 2016, management committed to a plan to sell the Company's two corporate airplanes and classified them
as held for sale at June 30, 2017 and 2016. The estimated fair value of these airplanes of $1.9 million and $2.8
million is included in the machinery and equipment line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2017 and
2016, respectively. A loss of $5.7 million was recorded in the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2016. Based on sales agreements, an additional loss of $0.9
million was recorded in fiscal 2017 to value the planes at fair market value less costs to sell in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.

Broadcast Rights—Broadcast rights consist principally of rights to broadcast syndicated programs, sports, and
feature films. The total cost of these rights is recorded as an asset and as a liability when programs become
available for broadcast. The current portion of broadcast rights represents those rights available for broadcast that
are expected to be amortized in the succeeding year. These rights are valued at the lower of unamortized cost or
estimated net realizable value, and are generally charged to operations on an accelerated basis over the contract
period. Impairments of unamortized costs to net realizable value are included in production, distribution, and
editorial expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. There were no material impairments
of unamortized costs in fiscals 2017, 2016, or 2015. Future write-offs can vary based on changes in consumer
viewing trends and the availability and costs of other programming.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill—Amortizable intangible assets consist primarily of network affiliation
agreements, retransmission agreements, and advertiser relationships. Intangible assets with finite lives are
amortized over their estimated useful lives. The useful life of an intangible asset is the period over which the asset
is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Network affiliation agreements are amortized
over the period of time the agreements are expected to remain in place, assuming renewals without material
modifications to the original terms and conditions (generally 25 to 40 years from the original acquisition date).
Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 1 to 10 years.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives include Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broadcast licenses.
These licenses are granted for a term of up to eight years, but are renewable if the Company provides at least an
average level of service to its customers and complies with the applicable FCC rules and policies and the
Communications Act of 1934. The Company has been successful in every one of its past license renewal requests
and has incurred only minimal costs in the process. The Company expects the television broadcasting business to
continue indefinitely; therefore, the cash flows from the broadcast licenses are also expected to continue
indefinitely.

Goodwill and certain other intangible assets (FCC broadcast licenses and trademarks), which have indefinite lives,
are not amortized but tested for impairment annually or when events occur or circumstances change that would
indicate the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The review of goodwill is performed at the reporting unit level.
The Company has three reporting units - local media, magazine brands, and Meredith Xcelerated Marketing

(MXM). We also assess, at least annually, whether assets classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets continue to
have indefinite lives.

At May 31, 2017, the date the Company last performed its annual evaluation of impairment of goodwill,
management elected to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test for the magazine brands and MXM
reporting units, and a qualitative assessment for the local media reporting unit. The first step of the quantitative test
is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. In reviewing other indefinite-lived intangible
assets for impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the asset to the asset’s carrying value. In the
qualitative assessment, we evaluate the reporting unit to determine if there are cost, legal and regulatory, market or
industry, or other macroeconomic factors that would lead us to believe that the carrying value of the reporting unit
is more likely than not greater than its fair value.

Fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows
expected to be generated by the reporting unit or to result from the use of the asset. These estimates include
assumptions about future revenues (including projections of overall market growth and our share of market),
estimated costs, and appropriate discount rates where applicable. Our assumptions are based on historical data,
various internal estimates, and a variety of external sources and are consistent with the assumptions used in both our
short-term financial forecasts and long-term strategic plans. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used,
future cash flow projections can vary within a range of outcomes. Changes in key assumptions about the magazine
brands and MXM and their prospects or changes in market conditions could result in an impairment charge.

Additional information regarding intangible assets and goodwill including a discussion of the impairment charges
taken in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 on goodwill and other long-lived intangible assets is provided in Note 4.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets—Long-lived assets (primarily property, plant, and equipment and amortizable
intangible assets) are reviewed for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate the carrying value of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the forecasted undiscounted cash flows
of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount of the assets. Tests for impairment or
recoverability require significant management judgment, and future events affecting cash flows and market
conditions could result in impairment losses.

Derivative Financial Instruments—Meredith does not engage in derivative or hedging activities, except to hedge
interest rate risk on debt as described in Note 6. Fundamental to our approach to risk management is the desire to
minimize exposure to volatility in interest costs of variable-rate debt, which can impact our earnings and cash
flows. We have entered into interest rate swap agreements with counterparties that are major financial institutions.
These agreements effectively fix the variable-rate cash flow on $300.0 million of a combination of our variable-rate
private placement senior notes and bank term loan. We designated and accounted for the interest rate swaps as cash
flow hedges in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The effective
portion of the change in the fair value of interest rate swaps is reported in other comprehensive income (loss). The
gain or loss included in other comprehensive income (loss) is subsequently reclassified into net earnings on the
same line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as the hedged item in the same period that the hedge
transaction affects net earnings. The ineffective portion of a change in fair value of the interest rate swaps would be
reported in interest expense. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, the interest rate swap agreements were considered
effective hedges and there were no material gains or losses recognized in earnings for hedge ineffectiveness.

Revenue Recognition—The Company's primary source of revenue is advertising. Other sources include circulation
and other revenues.

Advertising revenues—Advertising revenues are recognized when advertisements are published (defined as an
issue's on-sale date) or aired by the broadcasting station, net of provisions for estimated rebates, rate adjustments,
and discounts. Barter revenues are included in advertising revenue and are also recognized when the advertisements
are published or the commercials are broadcast. Barter advertising revenues and the offsetting expense are
recognized at the fair value of the advertising surrendered, as determined by similar cash transactions. Barter

advertising revenues were not material in any period. Digital advertising revenues are recognized ratably over the
contract period or as services are delivered.

Circulation revenues—Circulation revenues include magazine single copy and subscription revenue. Single copy
revenue is recognized upon publication, net of provisions for estimated returns. The Company bases its estimates
for returns on historical experience and current marketplace conditions. Revenues from magazine subscriptions are
deferred and recognized proportionately as products are distributed to subscribers.

Other revenues—Revenues from customer relationship marketing and other custom programs are recognized when
the products or services are delivered. In addition, the Company participates in certain arrangements containing
multiple deliverables. The guidance for accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements requires that overall
arrangement consideration be allocated to each deliverable (unit of accounting) in the revenue arrangement based
on the relative selling price as determined by vendor specific objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated
selling price. The related revenue is recognized when each specific deliverable of the arrangement is delivered.
Brand licensing-based revenues are accrued generally monthly or quarterly based on the specific mechanisms of
each contract. Payments are generally made by the Company's partners on a quarterly basis. Generally, revenues are
accrued based on estimated sales and adjusted as actual sales are reported by partners. These adjustments are
typically recorded within three months of the initial estimates and have not been material. Any minimum guarantees
are typically earned evenly over the fiscal year. Retransmission consent revenues are recognized over the contract
period based on the negotiated fee.

In certain instances, revenues are recorded gross in accordance with GAAP although the Company receives cash for
a lesser amount due to the netting of certain expenses. Amounts received from customers in advance of revenue
recognition are deferred as liabilities and recognized as revenue in the period earned.

Contingent Consideration—The Company estimates and records the acquisition date estimated fair value of
contingent consideration as part of purchase price consideration for acquisitions. Additionally, each reporting
period, the Company estimates changes in the fair value of contingent consideration, and any change in fair value is
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. An increase in the earn-out expected to be paid will result in
a charge to operations in the quarter that the anticipated fair value of contingent consideration increases, while a
decrease in the earn-out expected to be paid will result in a credit to operations in the quarter that the anticipated
fair value of contingent consideration decreases. The estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration requires
subjective assumptions to be made of future operating results, discount rates, and probabilities assigned to various
potential operating result scenarios. Future revisions to these assumptions could materially change the estimate of
the fair value of contingent consideration and, therefore, materially affect the Company’s future financial results.
Additional information regarding contingent consideration is provided in Note 2.

Advertising Expenses—The majority of the Company's advertising expenses relate to direct-mail costs for
magazine subscription acquisition efforts. Advertising costs that are not capitalized are expensed the first time the
advertising takes place. Total advertising expenses included in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings were $63.9
million in fiscal 2017, $72.6 million in fiscal 2016, and $75.8 million in fiscal 2015.

Share-based Compensation—The Company establishes fair value for its equity awards to determine their cost and
recognizes the related expense over the appropriate vesting period. The Company recognizes expense for stock
options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and shares issued under the Company's employee stock purchase
plan. See Note 11 for additional information related to share-based compensation expense.

Income Taxes—The income tax provision is calculated under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when such a change is enacted. The

Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being
sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely
of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in
judgment occurs.

Self-Insurance—The Company self-insures for certain medical claims, and its responsibility generally is capped
through the use of a stop loss contract with an insurance company at a certain dollar level (usually $350 thousand).
A third-party administrator is used to process claims. The Company uses actual claims data and estimates of
incurred-but-not-reported claims to calculate estimated liabilities for unsettled claims on an undiscounted basis.
Although management re-evaluates the assumptions and reviews the claims experience on an ongoing basis, actual
claims paid could vary significantly from estimated claims.

Pensions and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions—Retirement benefits are provided to employees
through pension plans sponsored by the Company. Pension benefits generally are based on the Company's
contributions and interest credits allocated to participants' accounts based on years of benefit service and annual
pensionable earnings. It is the Company's policy to fund the qualified pension plans to at least the extent required to
maintain their fully funded status. In addition, the Company provides health care and life insurance benefits for
certain retired employees, the expected costs of which are accrued over the years that the employees render
services. It is the Company's policy to fund postretirement benefits as claims are paid. Additional information is
provided in Note 8.

Comprehensive Income—Comprehensive income consists of net earnings and other gains and losses affecting
shareholders' equity that, under GAAP, are excluded from net earnings. Other comprehensive income (loss)
includes changes in prior service costs and net actuarial losses from pension and postretirement benefit plans, net of
taxes, and changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net of taxes, to the extent that they are
effective.

Earnings Per Share—Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
common and Class B shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly but includes the dilutive
effect, if any, of the assumed exercise of securities, including the effect of shares issuable under the Company's
share-based incentive plans.

Merger Termination—In January 2016, the Company and Media General, Inc. (Media General) terminated their
merger agreement under which the companies would have combined to form Meredith Media General. In exchange
for terminating the merger agreement, the Company received $60.0 million in cash and an opportunity to negotiate
for the purchase of certain broadcast and digital assets owned by Media General. The $60.0 million has been
included as a credit in the merger termination fee net of merger-related costs line in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings. The Company incurred $16.5 million of investment banking, legal, accounting, and other professional
fees and expenses in fiscal 2016 related to the terminated merger. These costs are also included in the merger
termination fee net of merger-related costs line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements—

ASU 2015-03—In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) on the presentation of debt issuance costs. The new standard requires that debt issuance costs be
recorded as a reduction from the face amount of the related debt rather than recorded as a deferred asset, with
amortization recorded as interest expense. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017,
and it was retrospectively applied to the prior period, as required. Adoption changed the classification of debt
issuance costs from other assets to current portion of long-term debt or long-term debt based on the classification of
the related debt instrument. As a result, other assets and long-term debt each decreased by $1.5 million as of
June 30, 2016, compared to amounts previously reported. Additionally, the format of the long-term debt disclosure
was updated to include debt issuance costs separately. The adoption did not have an impact on our results of
operations or cash flows.

ASU 2015-05—In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of cloud computing arrangements that
include a software license. The new guidance requires capitalization of the software license fee as internal-use
software if certain criteria are met, otherwise the costs are expensed as incurred. The standard was prospectively
adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of the standard had no impact to the
Company's consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2015-10—In June 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that included technical corrections
to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. These technical corrections are divided into four categories:
amendments related to differences between original guidance and the codification, guidance clarification and
reference corrections, minor structural changes to simplify the codification, and minor improvements that are not
expected to have a significant impact on current accounting practice. The amendments were effective for the
Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of the amendments had no impact to the Company's
consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Pronouncements—

ASU 2014-09—In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that replaces existing revenue
recognition guidance. The new guidance requires a company to recognize revenue for the transfer of promised
goods or services equal to the amount it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance
includes a five-step framework to determine the timing and amount of revenue to recognize related to contracts with
customers. Additionally, the guidance requires new and significantly enhanced disclosures about the nature,
amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from customer contracts as well as judgments made by a
company when following the framework. The FASB continues to issue amendments to further clarify provisions of
this guidance. These amendments will be effective upon adoption of the standard.

The Company will adopt the standard beginning July 1, 2018 (fiscal 2019). The two permitted transition methods
are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period
presented and the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized in the earliest period shown; and
the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be
recognized at the date of initial application. While a final decision has not been made, we currently anticipate
adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method.

We are in the process of documenting the impact of the guidance on our current accounting policies and practices to
identify material differences, if any, that would result from applying the new requirements to our revenue contracts.
We continue to make progress on our revenue recognition review and are also in the process of evaluating the
impact, if any, on changes to our business processes, systems, and controls to support recognition and disclosure
requirements under the new guidance. As these reviews are completed, the Company will be better able to quantify
the anticipated impact, if any, to our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-01—In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance to improve and simplify accounting for financial
instruments. The updated guidance includes several provisions that are not applicable to the Company's
consolidated financial statements, with the exception of changes to fair value disclosure. Under the new guidance,
public entities are no longer required to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value
of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheets. It also requires public
entities to use the exit price when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The
guidance is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this guidance requires a
change in our disclosures only and it is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

ASU 2016-02—In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that replaces existing lease
accounting standards. The new standard requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of use asset,
representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms
greater than 12 months. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the
amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. Treatment of lease payments in the statement of

earnings and statement of cash flows is relatively unchanged from previous guidance. The new standard is required
to be applied with a modified retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented with various optional
practical expedients. The standard is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019, with early adoption
permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating our existing lease portfolios, including accumulating all of
the necessary information required to properly account for the leases under the new standard. As such, the Company
is currently evaluating the effect the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-07—In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance simplifying the transition to the equity method of
accounting. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to apply the equity method of accounting retrospectively
when a reporting entity obtains significant influence over a previously held investment. The new guidance is
effective for the Company during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this guidance is currently not
expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-09—In March 2016, as a part of its simplification initiative, the FASB issued guidance on the
accounting for employee share-based payments. The new guidance is intended to simplify several aspects of the
accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax treatment, classification of awards as
either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective in the
Company's first quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the guidance will have on
our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-13—In June 2016, the FASB issued a standard that replaces the current incurred loss methodology for
recognizing credit losses with a current expected credit loss methodology. Under this standard, the establishment of
an allowance for credit losses reflects all relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable
supportable forecasts rather than delaying the recognition of the full amount of a credit loss until the the loss is
probable of occurring. The new standard changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other
instruments, including trade receivables. A modified retrospective implementation of this standard is effective in the
Company's first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-15—In August 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standards update clarifying the classification of
certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The update is intended to reduce the diversity in
practice around how certain transactions are classified within the statement of cash flows. Retrospective adoption is
required in our first quarter of fiscal 2019 with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-01—In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that clarifies the definition of a
business and adds guidance to assist entities in the determination of whether an acquisition (or disposal) represents
assets or a business. The update provides a test to determine whether or not an acquisition is a business. If
substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset or a group of similar
identifiable assets, the acquired assets do not represent a business. If this test is not met, the update provides further
guidance to evaluate if the acquisition represents a business. Prospective adoption is required in the first quarter of
fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted if certain transaction criteria are met. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-04—In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that simplifies the subsequent
measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test . The Step 2 test requires an entity
to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, an entity will
record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying value over its fair value determined
in Step 1. This update also eliminates the qualitative assessment requirements for a reporting unit with zero or
negative carrying value. Prospective adoption is required in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial
statements.

ASU 2017-07—In March 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update on the presentation of net periodic
pension and postretirement benefit costs. This guidance revises how employers that sponsor defined benefit pension
and other postretirement plans present the net periodic benefit costs in their income statement and requires that the
service cost component of net periodic benefit costs be presented in the same line items as other employee
compensation costs for the related employees. Of the components of net periodic benefit costs, only the service cost
component will be eligible for asset capitalization. The other components of net periodic benefit costs must be
presented separately from the line items that include the service cost and outside of the income from operations
subtotal. The update is effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted. The adoption is
expected to require reclassification of expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings; however, it is not
expected to have an impact on the Company's operating results or cash flows.

2. Acquisitions

Fiscal 2017
During fiscal 2017, Meredith paid $84.4 million for the acquisitions of WPCH-TV (Peachtree TV), an independent
television station in Atlanta, Georgia, and the assets of a digital lead-generation company in the home services
market.

On December 7, 2016, Meredith acquired the assets of a digital lead-generation company in the home services
market, which has been rebranded Meredith Performance Marketing by the Company. The acquisition-date fair
value of the consideration was $21.1 million, which consisted of $13.4 million of cash and $7.7 million of
contingent consideration. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay contingent
payments based on the achievement of certain operational targets in fiscal 2017 and on financial performance
during fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2021 measured in terms of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization (EBITDA) as defined in the acquisition agreement. The contingent consideration is not dependent on
the continued employment of the sellers. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration using a
probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The fair value is based on significant inputs not observable in the
market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in Note 14. During fiscal 2017, the Company paid
$2.6 million in contingent consideration. Although operating performance for the brand has been strong, revised
projections in revenues resulted in lower projected EBITDA than anticipated at acquisition. Therefore, the
Company recognized a non-cash credit to operations of $0.4 million in fiscal 2017 to reduce the estimated
contingent consideration payable. This credit was recorded in the selling, general, and administrative expense line
on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. As of June 30, 2017, the Company estimates the future payments will
range from $4.4 million to $6.2 million.

Effective April 21, 2017, Meredith acquired Peachtree TV, which was operated by Meredith prior to its acquisition.
The results of Peachtree TV's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date.
The cash purchase price was $70.0 million.

The following table summarizes the fair value of total consideration transferred and the recognized amounts of
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by segment during the year ended June 30, 2017:

(In thousands)
Consideration
Cash ......................................................................... $
Payment in escrow...................................................
Contingent consideration arrangements ..................
Fair value of total consideration transferred............ $

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed
Total identifiable assets acquired ............................ $
Total liabilities assumed ..........................................
Total identified net assets ........................................
Goodwill..................................................................

Local
Media
Acquisition

National
Media
Acquisition

70,000
—
—
70,000

81,615
(23,444)
58,171
11,829
70,000

11,819
1,600
7,681
21,100

8,600
—
8,600
12,500
21,100

Total

81,819
1,600
7,681
91,100

90,215
(23,444)
66,771
24,329
91,100

The following table provides details of the acquired intangible assets by acquisition:

(In thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization

Local
Media
Acquisition

National
Media
Acquisition

Retransmission agreements.................................. $
Customer list ........................................................
Other.....................................................................
Total.........................................................................
Intangible assets not subject to amortization

6,694
—
657
7,351

Total

6,694
4,200
5,057
15,951

— $

4,200
4,400
8,600

—
8,600

FCC licenses ........................................................
Intangible assets ...................................................... $

50,477
57,828

50,477
66,428

The useful life of the customer list is 10 years, and other national media intangible assets' useful life is 5 years. The
useful lives of the retransmission agreements are 10 years and local media other intangible assets' useful life is 4
years.

For these acquisitions, goodwill is attributable primarily to expected synergies and the assembled workforces.
Goodwill, with an assigned value of $24.3 million, is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.

During fiscal 2017, acquisition related costs of $0.3 million were incurred. These costs are included in the selling,
general, and administrative line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Fiscal 2015
During fiscal 2015, Meredith paid $257.0 million primarily for the acquisitions of the television station WGGB, the
ABC affiliate in Springfield, Massachusetts; MyWedding LLC (Mywedding); the television station WALA, the
FOX affiliate in Mobile, Alabama-Pensacola, Florida; Selectable Media, Inc. (Selectable Media); the Shape brand
and related digital assets (collectively Shape); and the assets of Qponix, a shopper marketing platform technology.

On October 31, 2014, Meredith acquired WGGB. The results of WGGB's operations have been included in the
consolidated financial statements since that date. The fair value of the consideration, including the purchase of
working capital, totaled $52.6 million, which consisted of $49.3 million of cash and a preliminary estimate of $3.3
million of contingent consideration. The contingent consideration arrangement required the Company to pay
contingent payments based on certain future regulatory actions. During fiscal 2017, the Company paid $4.0 million
in contingent consideration, which was the maximum amount of contingent consideration that could be earned
under the asset purchase agreement.

Effective November 1, 2014, Meredith completed its acquisition of Martha Stewart Living magazine and its related
digital assets (collectively Martha Stewart Living Media Properties). In addition, Meredith entered into a 10‑year
licensing arrangement with Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSLO) for the licensing of the Martha Stewart
Living trade name. The acquired business operations included sales and marketing, circulation, production, and
other non-editorial functions. Meredith sourced editorial content from MSLO. On December 22, 2015, Meredith
entered into a new 10‑year licensing arrangement with Sequential Brands Group, Inc. This agreement replaced the
October 2014 agreement with MSLO (which was acquired by Sequential Brands Group, Inc. in 2015). Under the
new agreement, Meredith assumed the cross-platform editorial responsibilities for the Martha Stewart Living and
Martha Stewart Weddings media brands and related digital assets. The results of the Martha Stewart Living Media
Properties have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the effective dates. There was no cash
consideration exchanged in these transactions.

On November 13, 2014, Meredith acquired 100 percent of the membership interests in Mywedding. Mywedding
operates mywedding.com, which proivdes couples with a complete wedding planning product suite. The results of
Mywedding have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. The acquisition-date fair
value of the consideration was $42.7 million, which consisted of $20.1 million of cash and a preliminary estimate of
$22.6 million of contingent consideration. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay a
contingent payment based on certain financial targets achieved during fiscal 2018 primarily based on EBITDA, as
defined in the acquisition agreement. The contingent consideration is not dependent on the continued employment
of the sellers. The fair value of the contingent consideration was originally estimated based on the projected results
for fiscal 2018 in financial models developed for the business at the time of acquisition. These models are reviewed
and updated on a quarterly basis. During fiscal 2017, quarterly comprehensive reviews of operations were
completed. As a result of the business having failed to achieve certain key milestones, the Company revised its
financial models. Projected fiscal 2018 results for the business are now lower than originally estimated.
Accordingly, in fiscal 2017, the Company recognized a non-cash credit to operations of $20.0 million to reduce the
estimated contingent consideration payable. This credit was recorded in the selling, general, and administrative
expense line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The fair value is based on significant inputs not
observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in Note 14. As of June 30, 2017, the
Company estimates the future payments will range from $0 to $10 million. In addition, during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2017, the Company fully impaired the trademark associated with this business. For further details of the
impairment, refer to Note 4.

On December 19, 2014, Meredith acquired WALA. The results of WALA's operations have been included in the
consolidated financial statements since that date. The cash purchase price, including the purchase of working
capital, was $90.4 million.

On December 30, 2014, Meredith acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Selectable Media, a leading
native and engagement-based digital advertising company. The results of Selectable Media have been included in
the consolidated financial statements since that date. The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration totaled
$30.2 million, which consisted of $23.0 million of cash and a preliminary estimate of $7.2 million of contingent
consideration. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay contingent payments based
on certain financial targets over three fiscal years primarily based on revenue, as defined in the acquisition
agreement. The contingent consideration is not dependent on the continued employment of the sellers. We estimated
the fair value of the contingent consideration using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The fair
value is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as

defined in Note 14. During fiscal 2017, the Company paid $4.0 million in contingent consideration. As of June 30,
2017, the Company estimates the future payments will be $4.0 million.

Effective February 1, 2015, Meredith completed its acquisition of Shape. Shape is the women's active lifestyle
category leader with content focusing on exercise, beauty, nutrition, health, fashion, wellness, and other lifestyle
topics to help women lead a healthier, active lifestyle. The results of Shape have been included in the consolidated
financial statements since the effective date. The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration totaled $87.4
million, which consisted of $60.0 million of cash and a preliminary estimate of $27.4 million of contingent
consideration. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay a contingent payment based
on the achievement of certain financial targets over three fiscal years primarily based on operating profit, as defined
in the acquisition agreement. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration using a probability-
weighted discounted cash flow model. The fair value is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and
thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in Note 14. Although operating performance for the brand has
been strong, revised projections in advertising revenue resulted in lower projected operating profit than anticipated
at acquisition. Therefore, the Company recognized non-cash credits to operations of $1.3 million in fiscal 2017 and
$4.9 million in fiscal 2016, to reduce the estimated contingent consideration payable. These credits were recorded
in the selling, general, and administrative expense line on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. As of June 30,
2017, the Company estimates the future payments will range from $20.9 million to $22.1 million.

On June 19, 2015, Meredith completed the acquisition of Qponix, a leading shopper marketing data platform
technology (hereafter referred to as Meredith Shopper Marketing). The results of the business have been included in
the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. The acquisition-date fair value of the
consideration totaled $2.3 million, which consisted of $1.5 million of cash and $0.8 million of contingent
consideration. During fiscal 2016, the Company paid $0.8 million in contingent consideration, which was the
maximum amount of contingent consideration that could be earned under the asset purchase agreement.

During fiscal 2015, acquisition related costs of $1.4 million were incurred. These costs are included in the selling,
general, and administrative line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of paper stock, editorial content, and books. Of total net inventory values, 65 percent at June 30,
2017, and 54 percent at June 30, 2016, were determined using the LIFO method. LIFO inventory income included
in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings was $1.7 million in fiscal 2017, $0.7 million in fiscal 2016, and $0.5
million in fiscal 2015.

June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)
Raw materials ............................................... $ 13,404
8,665
Work in process ............................................
1,111
Finished goods..............................................
23,180
(1,290)
Reserve for LIFO cost valuation ..................
Inventories .................................................... $ 21,890

$ 11,698
10,107
1,834
23,639
(2,961)
$ 20,678

4. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible assets consist of the following:

June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Intangible assets
subject to amortization
National media

Gross
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Amount

Gross
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Amount

Advertiser relationships .............. $ 18,610
7,280
Customer lists..............................
22,325
Other............................................

(15,514) $
(3,395)
(9,850)

3,096
3,885
12,475

$ 18,610
5,230
19,425

(10,670) $
(4,310)
(8,685)

7,940
920
10,740

Local media

Network affiliation agreements...
Retransmission agreements.........
Other............................................

229,309
27,923
1,680
Total ................................................. $ 307,127
Intangible assets not
subject to amortization
National media

Internet domain names ................
Trademarks..................................

Local media

FCC licenses ...............................
Total .................................................
Intangible assets, net ........................

(142,216)
(10,700)
(472)
$ (182,147)

87,093
17,223
1,208
124,980

229,309
21,229
1,214
$ 295,017

(135,789)
(6,993)
(419)
$ (166,866)

93,520
14,236
795
128,151

7,827
147,915

675,161
830,903
$ 955,883

7,827
153,215

624,684
785,726
$ 913,877

Amortization expense was $19.1 million in fiscal 2017, $19.7 million in fiscal 2016, and $17.6 million in fiscal
2015. Future amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be as follows: $17.2 million in fiscal 2018,
$14.6 million in fiscal 2019, $13.8 million in fiscal 2020, $9.7 million in fiscal 2021, and $7.3 million in fiscal
2022. Actual future amortization expense could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions,
dispositions, and other factors.

Due to continued weakness in the Mywedding.com revenue forecasts and a lack of sales growth from recent brand
support efforts, the annual impairment analysis performed as of May 31, 2017, of the Mywedding trademark
indicated an impairment. As such, during fiscal 2017, the national media segment recorded a non-cash impairment
charge of $5.3 million to fully impair the Mywedding trademark. During fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a non-
cash impairment charge of $38.9 million on the national media segment's American Baby trademark. Management
determined that this trademark was fully impaired as part of management's decision to discontinue the use of the
American Baby brand following its combination with the Fit Pregnancy brand. These impairment charges are
recorded in the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:

(In thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2015

Goodwill................................................... $
Accumulated impairment losses ..............

Acquisitions..................................................
Impairment ...................................................

Balance at June 30, 2016

Goodwill...................................................
Accumulated impairment losses ..............

Acquisitions..................................................
Balance at June 30, 2017

Goodwill...................................................
Accumulated impairment losses ..............

National
Media

Local
Media

Total

932,471 $
—
932,471
(1,168)
(116,949)
(118,117)

68,775 $ 1,001,246
—
1,001,246
(1,168)
(116,949)
(118,117)

—
68,775
—
—
—

931,303
(116,949)
814,354
12,500

68,775
—
68,775
11,829

1,000,078
(116,949)
883,129
24,329

943,803
(116,949)
826,854 $

80,604
—
80,604 $

1,024,407
(116,949)
907,458

During fiscal 2017, the Company performed a qualitative assessment of the local media reporting unit during its
annual impairment review as of May 31, 2017, and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of
the Company's local media reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Therefore, the quantitative goodwill
impairment test for the local media reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2017.

The national media segment is comprised of two reporting units, the magazine brands reporting unit, which has
$772.0 million of goodwill, and the MXM reporting unit, which has $54.9 million of goodwill at June 30, 2017.

As of May 31, 2017, the fair value of the magazine brands reporting unit exceeded its net assets by approximately
30 percent. The fair value of the magazine brands reporting unit assumes a discount rate of 9.5 percent. Assumed
revenue growth rates range from approximately flat to up 2.0 percent. The assumed terminal growth rate is 2.0
percent. These assumptions are contingent upon a stable economic environment, continuing strong consumer
engagement, and a continuing shift to digital platforms. Holding other assumptions constant, a 100 basis point
increase in the discount rate would result in an estimated fair value that exceeds net assets by 17 percent. Holding
other assumptions constant, a 100 basis point decrease in the terminal growth rate would result in an estimated fair
value that exceeds net assets by 22 percent. Both of these scenarios individually indicate no impairment in the
magazine brands reporting unit.

As of May 31, 2017, the fair value of the MXM reporting unit exceeded its net assets by nearly 80 percent. The fair
value of the MXM reporting unit assumes a discount rate of 12 percent, near term revenue growth rates ranging
from 2.5 percent to 5.0 percent, and a terminal growth rate of 2.5 percent. These assumptions are contingent upon a
stable economic environment and either retaining or replacing key customers. Holding other assumptions constant,
a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in an estimated fair value that exceeds net assets by 62
percent. Holding other assumptions constant, a 100 basis point decrease in the terminal growth rate would result in
an estimated fair value that exceeds net assets by more than 61 percent. Both of these scenarios individually
indicate no impairment in the MXM reporting unit.

Meredith completed annual impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for the local
media reporting unit and the magazine brands reporting unit as of May 31, 2016. No impairments were recorded as
a result of these reviews.

In fiscal 2016, the Company determined that triggering events, including reduced operating and cash flow forecasts,
required us to perform an evaluation of goodwill for the MXM reporting unit for impairment. Due to the timing of
the triggering events, this testing was performed in conjunction with the Company's annual impairment testing as of
May 31, 2016. This evaluation indicated that the carrying value of MXM's goodwill exceeded its estimated fair
value. As a result, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $116.9 million to reduce the
carrying value of MXM's goodwill in fiscal 2016. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $9.5 million
related to this charge. This impairment charge is recorded in the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Meredith completed an annual impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives as of
May 31, 2015. No impairments were recorded as a result of this review.

5. Restructuring Accrual

During fiscal 2017, management committed to several performance improvement plans related primarily to
business realignments. These actions resulted in selected workforce reductions. In connection with these plans, the
Company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges totaling $12.4 million including $11.9 million for severance and
related benefit costs related to the involuntary termination of employees and other accruals of $0.3 million. The
majority of severance costs will be paid out during fiscal 2018. The plans affected approximately 215 employees.
The severance and related benefit costs and other accruals are recorded in the selling, general, and administrative
line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The Company also wrote down manuscript and art inventory by
$0.2 million, which is recorded in the production, distribution, and editorial line of the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings.

During fiscal 2016, management committed to several performance improvement plans that resulted in selected
workforce reductions related primarily to business realignments from recent acquisitions and the closing of MORE
magazine effective following the publication of the April 2016 issue. In connection with these plans, the Company
recorded pre-tax restructuring charges of $10.3 million. The restructuring charges included severance and related
benefit costs of $9.8 million related to the involuntary termination of employees which is recorded in the selling,
general, and administrative line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. These plans affected approximately
150 employees. The Company also wrote down related manuscript and art inventory by $0.5 million, which is
recorded in the production, distribution, and editorial line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

During fiscal 2015, management committed to several performance improvement plans related to business
realignments resulting primarily from recent broadcast station acquisitions, recent digital business acquisitions, and
other selected workforce reductions. In connection with these plans, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring
charges of $16.6 million. The restructuring charges included severance and related benefit costs of $14.7 million
related to the involuntary termination of employees and other write-downs and accruals of $0.4 million, which are
recorded in the selling, general, and administrative line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. These plans
affected approximately 275 employees. The Company also wrote down video production fixed assets that the
Company abandoned for $1.2 million, which is recorded in the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and manuscript and art inventory for $0.3 million, which is
recorded in the production, distribution, and editorial line of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

During the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company recorded reversals of $1.8 million, $3.2
million, and $0.1 million, respectively, of excess restructuring reserves accrued in prior fiscal years. The reversals
of excess restructuring reserves are recorded as a credit in the selling, general, and administrative line of the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Details of changes in the Company's restructuring accrual are as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year ........................ $
Severance accrual .........................................
Cash payments..............................................
Reversal of excess accrual............................
Balance at end of year .................................. $

7,388
11,863
(8,801)
(1,776)
8,674

$ 15,731
9,792
(14,888)
(3,247)
7,388

6. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

June 30,
(In thousands)
Variable-rate credit facilities

2017

2016

Asset-backed bank facility of $100 million, due 10/20/2017......................................... $ 75,000
85,000
Revolving credit facility of $200 million, due 11/30/2021 ............................................
240,625
Term loan due 11/30/2021 ..............................................................................................

$ 80,000
40,000
225,000

Private placement notes

—
3.04% senior notes, due 3/1/2017...................................................................................
50,000
3.04% senior notes, due 3/1/2018...................................................................................
100,000
Floating rate senior notes, due 12/19/2022.....................................................................
150,000
Floating rate senior notes, due 2/28/2024.......................................................................
700,625
Total long-term debt ..............................................................................................................
(2,388)
Unamortized debt issuance costs ..........................................................................................
(62,500)
Current portion of long-term debt .........................................................................................
Long-term debt...................................................................................................................... $ 635,737

50,000
50,000
100,000
150,000
695,000
(1,494)
(75,000)
$ 618,506

The following table shows principal payments on the debt due in succeeding fiscal years:

Years ending June 30,
(In thousands)
62,500
2018 ................................................. $
21,875
2019 .................................................
25,000
2020 .................................................
25,000
2021 .................................................
316,250
2022 .................................................
Thereafter.........................................
250,000
Total long-term debt ........................ $ 700,625

In connection with the asset-backed bank facility, Meredith entered into a revolving agreement to sell all of its
rights, title, and interest in the majority of its accounts receivable related to advertising and miscellaneous revenues
to Meredith Funding Corporation, a special purpose entity established to purchase accounts receivable from

Meredith. At June 30, 2017, $179.6 million of accounts receivable net of reserves were outstanding under the
agreement. Meredith Funding Corporation in turn sells receivable interests to a major national bank. In
consideration of the sale, Meredith receives cash and a subordinated note, bearing interest at the prime rate, 4.25
percent at June 30, 2017, from Meredith Funding Corporation. The agreement is structured as a true sale under
which the creditors of Meredith Funding Corporation will be entitled to be satisfied out of the assets of Meredith
Funding Corporation prior to any value being returned to Meredith or its creditors. The accounts of Meredith
Funding Corporation are fully consolidated in Meredith's consolidated financial statements. The interest rate on the
asset-backed bank facility is based on a fixed spread over London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The weighted
average effective interest rate was 2.08 percent as of June 30, 2017. The current term of the asset-backed bank
facility ends in October 2017. We expect to renew this facility on or before its expiration date under substantially
similar terms or refinance it with available borrowing capacity.

The Company holds interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable interest rate risk on the $250.0 million floating-
rate senior notes and on $50.0 million of the term loan. The expiration of the swaps is as follows: $50.0 million in
August 2018, $100.0 million in March 2019, and $150.0 million in August 2019. Under the swaps the Company
will pay fixed rates of interest (1.36 percent on the swap maturing in August 2018, 1.53 percent on the swap
maturing in March 2019, and 1.76 percent on the swaps maturing in August 2019) and receive variable rates of
interest based on the one to three-month LIBOR (1.21 percent on the swap maturing in August 2018, 1.28 percent
on the swap maturing in March 2019, and 1.20 percent on the swaps maturing in August 2019 as of June 30, 2017)
on the $300.0 million notional amount of indebtedness. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges. The
Company evaluates the effectiveness of the hedging relationships on an ongoing basis by recalculating changes in
fair value of the derivatives and related hedged items independently.

Unrealized gains or losses on cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive loss to the extent the cash flow
hedges are effective. The amount of the swap that offsets the effects of interest rate changes on the related debt is
subsequently reclassified into interest expense. Any ineffective portions on cash flow hedges are recorded in interest
expense. No material ineffectiveness existed at either June 30, 2017 or 2016.

The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is the estimated amount the Company would pay or receive to
terminate the swap agreements. At June 30, 2017 and 2016, the swaps had a fair value of a net liability of $0.4
million and $7.3 million, respectively. The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties to the swap agreements. The Company strives to manage this exposure through
diversification and monitoring of the creditworthiness of the counterparties. There was $0.2 million potential loss
that the Company would incur on the interest rate swaps if the counterparties were to fail to meet their obligations
under the agreements at June 30, 2017, and none at June 30, 2016. Given the strong creditworthiness of the
counterparties, management does not expect any of them to fail to meet their obligations. Additionally, the
concentration of risk with any individual counterparty is not considered significant at June 30, 2017.

The interest rates on the private placement floating-rate senior notes is based on a fixed spread over LIBOR.
Interest rates on the private placement floating-rate senior notes were 3.03 percent on the $100.0 million note and
3.26 percent on the $150.0 million note at June 30, 2017, after taking into account the effect of outstanding interest
rate swap agreements. As of June 30, 2017, the weighted average interest rate was 2.49 percent for the revolving
credit facility and term loan, after taking into account the effect of the outstanding interest rate swap agreement. The
interest rate under both facilities is variable based on LIBOR and Meredith's debt to trailing 12 month EBITDA (as
defined in the debt agreement) ratio.

All of the Company's debt agreements include financial covenants and failure to comply with any such covenants
could result in the debt becoming payable on demand. The most significant financial covenants require a ratio of
debt to trailing 12 month EBITDA of less than 3.75 and a ratio of EBITDA to interest expense of greater than 2.75.
The Company was in compliance with these and all other financial covenants at June 30, 2017.

Interest expense related to long-term debt and the amortization of the associated debt issuance costs totaled $18.8
million in fiscal 2017, $20.3 million in fiscal 2016, and $19.2 million in fiscal 2015.

At June 30, 2017, Meredith had additional credit available under the asset-backed bank facility of up to $25.0
million (depending on levels of accounts receivable) and had $115.0 million of credit available under the revolving
credit facility with an option to request up to another net $200.0 million. The commitment fee for the asset-backed
bank facility ranges from 0.40 percent to 0.45 percent of the unused commitment based on utilization levels. The
commitment fees for the revolving credit facility ranges from 0.125 percent to 0.25 percent of the unused
commitment based on the Company's leverage ratio. Commitment fees paid in fiscal 2017 were not material.

7. Income Taxes

The following table shows income tax expense attributable to earnings before income taxes:

Years ended June 30,

(In thousands)
Currently payable

2017

2016

2015

Federal ................................. $ 62,170
403
State .....................................
38
Foreign.................................
62,611

Deferred

Federal .................................
State .....................................

32,961
5,834
38,795
Income taxes............................... $ 101,406

$ 59,173
7,263
30
66,466

8,297
1,507
9,804
$ 76,270

$ 39,429
4,583
35
44,047

36,314
5,608
41,922
$ 85,969

The differences between the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate were as follows:

Years ended June 30,
U.S. statutory tax rate ...................................................
State income taxes, less federal income tax benefits ....
Settlements - audits / tax litigation ...............................
Impairment of goodwill ................................................
Other .............................................................................
Effective income tax rate ..............................................

2017
35.0%
3.0
(2.3)
—
(0.8)
34.9%

2016
35.0%
3.6
(0.4)
29.3
1.7
69.2%

2015
35.0%
2.9
(0.1)
—
0.8
38.6%

The Company's effective tax rate was 34.9 percent in fiscal 2017, 69.2 percent in fiscal 2016, and 38.6 percent in
fiscal 2015. The fiscal 2017 effective tax rate was primarily impacted by a credit to income taxes of $6.7 million
related to the resolution of certain federal and state tax uncertainties recorded in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2016, the
Company recorded an impairment of goodwill of $116.9 million, of which approximately 20 percent was deductible
for income tax purposes.

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as
follows:

June 30,

(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets

2017

2016

Accounts receivable allowances and return reserves......................... $ 11,019
47,222
Compensation and benefits ................................................................
5,068
Indirect benefit of uncertain state and foreign tax positions..............
7,676
All other assets...................................................................................
70,985
Total deferred tax assets ...........................................................................
—
Valuation allowance..................................................................................
70,985
Net deferred tax assets..............................................................................
Deferred tax liabilities

86,426
Subscription acquisition costs............................................................
329,826
Accumulated depreciation and amortization .....................................
29,820
Deferred gains from dispositions .......................................................
9,639
All other liabilities .............................................................................
Total deferred tax liabilities......................................................................
455,711
Net deferred tax liability........................................................................... $ 384,726

$ 12,742
45,813
10,598
16,589
85,742
(905)
84,837

88,177
292,871
29,804
10,331
421,183
$ 336,346

The Company has $8.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal purposes which will expire if unused
from fiscal 2029 through fiscal 2034. It is expected that all net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized prior to
expiration. There are no related state net operating loss carryforwards remaining.

The Company's June 30, 2017, deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year ................................. $
Increases in tax positions for prior years ...............
Decreases in tax positions for prior years..............
Increases in tax positions for current year .............
Settlements ............................................................
Lapse in statute of limitations................................
Balance at end of year ........................................... $

37,966
774
(3,052)
2,864
(181)
(8,848)
29,523

35,919
51
(2,334)
6,259
(97)
(1,832)
37,966

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was $18.2
million as of June 30, 2017, and $28.3 million as of June 30, 2016. The uncertain tax benefit recognized during
fiscal 2017 from lapse in statute of limitations that related to income tax positions on temporary differences was
$0.5 million. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense. The amount of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was $6.0
million and $8.6 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2017, may change significantly within the next 12
months, decreasing by an estimated range of $6.8 million to $2.5 million. The change, if any, may result primarily
from foreseeable federal and state examinations, ongoing federal and state examinations, anticipated state
settlements, expiration of various statutes of limitation, the results of tax cases, or other regulatory developments.

The Company's federal tax returns for fiscal years prior to fiscal 2013 are no longer subject to further IRS
examination. However, certain items from completed examinations of fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2012 are still
pending final resolution as of June 30, 2017. Fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015 are under IRS examination. The
Company has various state income tax examinations ongoing and at various stages of completion, but generally the
state income tax returns have been audited or closed to audit through fiscal 2005.

8. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

Savings and Investment Plan

Meredith maintains a 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan that permits eligible employees to contribute funds on a
pre-tax basis. The plan allows employee contributions of up to 50 percent of eligible compensation subject to the
maximum allowed under federal tax provisions. Prior to January 1, 2017, the Company matched 100 percent of the
first 3 percent and 50 percent of the next 2 percent of employee contributions. Effective January 1, 2017, the
Company matches 100 percent of the first 4 percent and 50 percent of the next 1 percent of employee contributions.

The 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan allows employees to choose among various investment options, including
the Company's common stock, for both their contributions and the Company's matching contribution. Company
contribution expense under this plan totaled $10.9 million in fiscal 2017, $9.6 million in fiscal 2016, and $9.7
million in fiscal 2015.

Pension and Postretirement Plans

Meredith has noncontributory pension plans covering substantially all employees. These plans include qualified
(funded) plans as well as nonqualified (unfunded) plans. These plans provide participating employees with
retirement benefits in accordance with benefit provision formulas. The nonqualified plans provide retirement
benefits only to certain highly compensated employees. The Company also sponsors defined healthcare and life
insurance plans that provide benefits to eligible retirees.

Obligations and Funded Status
The following tables present changes in, and components of, the Company's net assets/liabilities for pension and
other postretirement benefits:

June 30,

Pension

Postretirement

2017

2016

2017

2016

(In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation, beginning of year...................... $ 161,892
12,545
Service cost..............................................................
4,900
Interest cost..............................................................
—
Participant contributions..........................................
501
Plan amendments.....................................................
3,600
Actuarial loss (gain) ................................................
Benefits paid (including lump sums).......................
(12,520)
Benefit obligation, end of year ................................ $ 170,918

$ 155,427
11,908
5,874
—
—
15,085
(26,402)
$ 161,892

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year ............ $ 122,583
18,527
Actual return on plan assets.....................................
10,635
Employer contributions ...........................................
—
Participant contributions..........................................
(12,520)
Benefits paid (including lump sums).......................
Fair value of plan assets, end of year ...................... $ 139,225

$ 141,586
1,129
6,270
—
(26,402)
$ 122,583

Under funded status, end of year............................. $ (31,693) $ (39,309)

9,666
92
321
787
—
(205)
(1,386)
9,275

9,408
101
385
748
—
565
(1,541)
9,666

— $
—
599
787
(1,386)

— $

—
—
793
748
(1,541)
—

(9,275) $

(9,666)

Benefits paid directly from Meredith assets are included in both employer contributions and benefits paid.

Fair value measurements for pension assets as of June 30, 2017, were as follows:

June 30, 2017

Total
Fair Value

Quoted
Prices
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)

(In thousands)
Investments in registered investment companies .... $ 138,886
339
Pooled separate accounts.........................................
Total assets at fair value .......................................... $ 139,225

$ 76,837
—
$ 76,837

$ 62,049
339
$ 62,388

—
—
—

Fair value measurements for pension assets as of June 30, 2016, were as follows:

June 30, 2016

Total
Fair Value

Quoted
Prices
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)

(In thousands)
Investments in registered investment companies .... $ 120,996
Pooled separate accounts.........................................
1,587
Total assets at fair value .......................................... $ 122,583

$ 65,376
—
$ 65,376

$ 55,620
1,587
$ 57,207

—
—
—

Refer to Note 14 for a discussion of the three levels in the hierarchy of fair values.

The following amounts are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

June 30,

(In thousands)
Other assets

Pension

Postretirement

2017

2016

2017

2016

Prepaid benefit cost..................................... $ 16,901

1,458

— $

—

Accrued expenses-compensation and benefits

Accrued benefit liability .............................

(5,776)

(4,703)

(657)

(656)

Other noncurrent liabilities

Accrued benefit liability .............................

(36,064)
Net amount recognized, end of year.................. $ (31,693) $ (39,309)

(42,818)

(8,618)
(9,275) $

(9,010)
(9,666)

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $154.0 million and $144.8 million at
June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table provides information about pension plans with projected benefit obligations and accumulated
benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

June 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)
Projected benefit obligation .................. $ 48,692
42,634
Accumulated benefit obligation ............
98
Fair value of plan assets ........................

$ 40,867
35,225
100

Costs
The components of net periodic benefit costs recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as
follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

Pension
2016

2015

2017

Postretirement
2016

2015

(In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit costs
Service cost.................................................. $ 12,545
4,900
Interest cost..................................................
(9,191)
Expected return on plan assets.....................
194
Prior service cost (credit) amortization........
3,587
Actuarial loss (gain) amortization ...............
Settlement charge.........................................
—
Net periodic benefit costs (credit)................ $ 12,035

$ 11,908
5,874
(10,982)
194
628
5,586
$ 13,208

$ 12,173
5,582
(11,037)
225
667
—
$ 7,610

92
321
—
(393)
(310)
—
(290) $

101
385
—
(428)
(677)
—
(619) $

117
407
—
(432)
(433)
—
(341)

The amortization of amounts related to unrecognized prior service costs/credit and net actuarial gain/loss was
reclassified out of other comprehensive income as components of net periodic benefit costs.

The pension settlement charge recorded in fiscal 2016 related to cash distributions paid by the pension plan during
fiscal 2016 exceeding a prescribed threshold. This required that a portion of pension losses within accumulated
other comprehensive loss be realized in the period that the related pension liabilities were settled.

Amounts recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders' equity for Company-
sponsored plans were as follows:

June 30,

2017

2016

Pension

Postretirement

Total

Pension

Postretirement

Total

(In thousands)
Unrecognized net actuarial losses
(gains), net of taxes ........................ $ 18,524
Unrecognized prior service cost
(credit), net of taxes .......................
659
Total ............................................... $ 19,183

$ (1,240)

$ 17,284

$ 24,267

$ (1,305)

$ 22,962

(210)
$ (1,450)

449
$ 17,733

470
$ 24,737

(452)
$ (1,757)

18
$ 22,980

During fiscal 2018, the Company expects to recognize as part of its net periodic benefit costs $2.1 million of net
actuarial losses and $0.3 million of prior service costs for the pension plans, and $0.3 million of net actuarial gains
and $0.3 million of prior service credit for the postretirement plan that are included, net of taxes, in the accumulated
other comprehensive loss component of shareholders' equity at June 30, 2017.

Assumptions
Benefit obligations were determined using the following weighted average assumptions:

June 30,
Weighted average assumptions
Discount rate ..............................................................
Rate of compensation increase...................................
Rate of increase in health care cost levels

Pension

2017

2016

Postretirement
2017

2016

3.41%
3.50%

2.98%
3.50%

3.65%
3.50%

3.40%
3.50%

Initial level ...........................................................
Ultimate level.......................................................
Years to ultimate level .........................................

n/a
n/a
n/a

7.00%
5.00%
4 years

7.00%
5.00%
5 years

n/a - Not applicable

Net periodic benefit costs were determined using the following weighted average assumptions:

Years ended June 30,
Weighted average assumptions
Discount rate ..........................................................
Expected return on plan assets ...............................
Rate of compensation increase...............................
Rate of increase in health care cost levels

2017

Pension
2016

2015

2017

Postretirement
2016

2015

2.98%
8.00%
3.50%

3.75%
8.00%
3.50%

3.57%
8.00%
3.50%

3.40%
n/a
3.50%

4.20%
n/a
3.50%

4.00%
n/a
3.50%

Initial level .......................................................
Ultimate level...................................................
Years to ultimate level .....................................

n/a
n/a
n/a

7.00%
5.00%
5 years

7.00%
5.00%
6 years

7.00%
5.00%
4 years

n/a - Not applicable

The expected return on plan assets assumption was determined, with the assistance of the Company's investment
consultants, based on a variety of factors. These factors include but are not limited to the plans' asset allocations,
review of historical capital market performance, historical plan performance, current market factors such as
inflation and interest rates, and a forecast of expected future asset returns. The Company reviews this long-term
assumption on a periodic basis.

Assumed rates of increase in healthcare cost have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare
plans. A change of one percentage point in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:

(In thousands)
Effect on service and interest cost components for fiscal 2017...............
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of June 30, 2017 .............

25
401

(20)
(329)

One
Percentage
Point Increase

One
Percentage
Point Decrease

Plan Assets
The targeted and weighted average asset allocations by asset category for investments held by the Company's
pension plans are as follows:

2017 Allocation

2016 Allocation

June 30,
Domestic equity securities..............
Fixed income investments ..............
International equity securities.........
Global equity securities ..................
Fair value of plan assets..................

Target
35%
30%
25%
10%
100%

Actual
34%
29%
27%
10%
100%

Target
35%
30%
25%
10%
100%

Actual
30%
32%
27%
11%
100%

Meredith's investment policy seeks to maximize investment returns while balancing the Company's tolerance for
risk. The plan fiduciaries oversee the investment allocation process. This includes selecting investment managers,
setting long-term strategic targets, and monitoring asset allocations. Target allocation ranges are guidelines, not
limitations, and plan fiduciaries may occasionally approve allocations above or below a target range, or elect to
rebalance the portfolio within the targeted range. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and
fixed-income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across domestic and international stocks
and between growth and value stocks and small and large capitalizations. The primary investment strategy currently
employed is a dynamic target allocation method that periodically rebalances among various investment categories
depending on the current funded position. This program is designed to actively move from return-seeking
investments (such as equities) toward liability-hedging investments (such as long-duration fixed-income) as funding
levels improve. The reverse effect occurs when funding levels decrease.

Equity securities did not include any Meredith Corporation common or Class B stock at June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Cash Flows
Although we do not have a minimum funding requirement for the pension plans in fiscal 2018, the Company is
currently determining what voluntary pension plan contributions, if any, will be made in fiscal 2018. Actual
contributions will be dependent upon investment returns, changes in pension obligations, and other economic and
regulatory factors. Meredith expects to contribute $0.7 million to its postretirement plan in fiscal 2018.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

Years ending June 30,

(In thousands)
2018.......................................
2019.......................................
2020.......................................
2021.......................................
2022.......................................
2023-2027 .............................

Pension
Benefits

Postretirement
Benefits

$ 22,207
24,165
25,726
21,562
15,723
83,584

657
699
688
674
655
2,874

Other
The Company maintains collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangements on certain key officers and
retirees. The net periodic pension cost for fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $0.5 million, $0.4 million, and $0.4
million, respectively, and the accrued liability at June 30, 2017 and 2016, was $4.3 million and $4.6 million,
respectively.

9. Earnings per Share

The calculation of basic earnings per share for each period is based on the weighted average number of common
and Class B shares outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for each period is
based on the weighted average number of common and Class B shares outstanding during the period plus the effect,
if any, of dilutive common stock equivalent shares.

The following table presents the calculations of earnings per share:

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands except per share data)
Net earnings ................................................................. $ 188,928
44,617
Basic average shares outstanding.................................
830
Dilutive effect of stock options and equivalents ..........
Diluted average shares outstanding..............................
45,447
Earnings per share

Basic ........................................................................ $
Diluted .....................................................................

4.23
4.16

33,937
44,606
751
45,357

$ 136,791
44,522
801
45,323

0.76
0.75

3.07
3.02

In addition, antidilutive options excluded from the above calculations totaled 0.3 million options for the year ended
June 30, 2017 ($54.28 weighted average exercise price), 1.3 million options for the year ended June 30, 2016
($49.02 weighted average exercise price), and 0.9 million options for the year ended June 30, 2015 ($50.52
weighted average exercise price).

10. Capital Stock

The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding: common and Class B. Each class receives equal
dividends per share. Class B stock, which has 10 votes per share, is not transferable as Class B stock except to
family members of the holder or certain other related entities. At any time, Class B stock is convertible, share for
share, into common stock with one vote per share. Class B stock transferred to persons or entities not entitled to
receive it as Class B stock will automatically be converted and issued as common stock to the transferee. The
principal market for trading the Company's common stock is the New York Stock Exchange (trading symbol MDP).
No separate public trading market exists for the Company's Class B stock.

From time to time, the Company's Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of the Company's
common stock and Class B stock. In May 2014, the Board approved the repurchase of $100.0 million of shares. As
of June 30, 2017, $68.0 million remained available under the current authorizations for future repurchases.

Repurchases of the Company's common and Class B stock are as follows:

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)
Number of shares .......................
Cost at market value................... $

941
53,399

651
31,080

925
46,764

Shares deemed to be delivered to the Company on tender of stock in payment for the exercise price of options do
not reduce the repurchase authority granted by our Board. Shares tendered for the exercise price of stock options
were 0.6 million shares at a cost of $37.5 million in fiscal 2017, 0.4 million shares at a cost of $18.0 million in
fiscal 2016, and 0.7 million shares at a cost of $35.6 million in fiscal 2015.

11. Common Stock and Share-based Compensation Plans

Meredith has a shareholder-approved stock incentive plan. Prior to January 1, 2016, the Company had a
shareholder-approved employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). The ESPP was suspended indefinitely as of January 1,
2016. More detailed descriptions of these plans follows. Compensation expense recognized for these plans was
$12.7 million in fiscal 2017, $12.8 million in fiscal 2016, and $12.5 million in fiscal 2015. The total income tax
benefit recognized in earnings was $4.8 million in fiscal 2017, $4.6 million in fiscal 2016, and $4.6 million in fiscal
2015.

Stock Incentive Plan

Meredith has a stock incentive plan that permits the Company to issue stock options, restricted stock, stock
equivalent units, restricted stock units, and performance shares to key employees and directors of the Company.
Approximately 9.0 million shares remained available for future awards under the plan as of June 30, 2017. Forfeited
awards, shares deemed to be delivered to us on tender of stock in payment for the exercise price of options, and
shares reacquired pursuant to tax withholding on option exercises and the vesting of restricted shares and restricted
stock units increase shares available for future awards. The plan is designed to provide an incentive to contribute to
the achievement of long-range corporate goals; provide flexibility in motivating, attracting, and retaining
employees; and to align more closely the employees' interests with those of shareholders.

The Company has awarded restricted shares of common stock and restricted stock units to eligible key employees
and to non-employee directors under the plan. In addition, certain awards are granted based on specified levels of
Company stock ownership. All awards have restriction periods tied primarily to employment and/or service. The
awards granted to employees generally vest over three or five years and the awards granted to directors vest one-
third each year during the three-year period from date of grant. The grant date of awards is the date the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves the granting of the awards. The awards are recorded
at the market value of traded shares on the date of the grant as unearned compensation. The initial values of the
grants, net of estimated forfeitures, are amortized over the vesting periods.

The Company's restricted stock activity during the year ended June 30, 2017, was as follows:

Restricted Stock

(Shares and Aggregate Intrinsic Value in thousands)
Nonvested at June 30, 2016 .................................
Granted ................................................................
Vested...................................................................
Forfeited...............................................................
Nonvested at June 30, 2017 .................................

179
7
(148)
—
38

Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

$ 45.93
47.65
47.08
45.78
41.85

2,282

As of June 30, 2017, there was $0.1 million of unearned compensation cost related to restricted stock granted under
the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years. The weighted average
grant date fair value of restricted stock granted during the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $47.65,
$47.01, and $51.22, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016,
and 2015, was $7.9 million, $8.5 million, and $7.8 million, respectively.

The Company's restricted stock unit activity during the year ended June 30, 2017, was as follows:

Restricted Stock Units

Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

319
153
(3)
(38)
431

$ 45.28
52.97
47.70
47.47
47.80

$ 25,628

As of June 30, 2017, there was $5.3 million of unearned compensation cost related to restricted stock units granted
under the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. The weighted
average grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
was $52.97, $44.44, and $46.21, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended June 30,
2017, 2016, and 2015 was $0.2 million, $0.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively.

Meredith also has outstanding stock equivalent units resulting from the deferral of compensation of employees and
directors under various deferred compensation plans. The period of deferral is specified when the deferral election
is made. These stock equivalent units are issued at the market price of the underlying stock on the date of deferral.
In addition, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units may be converted to stock equivalent units upon
vesting.

The following table summarizes the activity for stock equivalent units during the year ended June 30, 2017:

Stock Equivalent Units

Units

Weighted Average
Issue Date
Fair Value

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(Units and Aggregate Intrinsic Value in thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2016 ..............................
Additions ......................................................
Converted to common stock.........................
Balance at June 30, 2017 ..............................

296
19
(19)
296

$ 36.77
53.58
37.51
37.81

$6,406

The total intrinsic value of stock equivalent units converted to common stock was $0.2 million in fiscal 2017, $0.1
million in fiscal 2016, and $0.1 million for fiscal year 2015.

Meredith has granted nonqualified stock options to certain employees and directors under the plan. The grant date
of options issued is the date the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves the granting of the
options. The exercise price of options granted is set at the fair value of the Company's common stock on the grant
date. All options granted under the plan expire at the end of 10 years. Options granted to employees vest three years
from the date of grant and options granted to directors vest one-third each year during the three-year period from
date of grant.

A summary of stock option activity and weighted average exercise prices follows:

Stock Options

Options

(Options and Aggregate Intrinsic Value in thousands)
Outstanding July 1, 2016 ............................................
Granted........................................................................
Exercised.....................................................................
Forfeited ......................................................................
Outstanding June 30, 2017..........................................
Exercisable June 30, 2017...........................................

2,414
467
(906)
(138)
1,837
694

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 42.12
52.43
41.76
49.82
44.34
38.19

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

6.8
4.3

$ 27,773
14,788

The fair value of each option is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company's common stock and other factors. The expected
life of options granted incorporates historical employee exercise and termination behavior. Different expected lives
are used for separate groups of employees who have similar historical exercise patterns. The risk-free rate for
periods that coincide with the expected life of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant.

The following summarizes the assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted:

Years ended June 30,
Risk-free interest rate ...................................
Expected dividend yield ...............................
Expected option life......................................
Expected stock price volatility .....................

2017
1.3-2.1%
4.00%
7 yrs
29%

2016
1.8-2.0%
4.00%
7 yrs
36%

2015
1.4-2.0%
4.00%
7 yrs
37%

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and
2015, was $9.35, $10.80, and $11.59, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $15.2 million, $8.0 million, and $14.2 million, respectively. As of
June 30, 2017, there was $2.1 million in unrecognized compensation cost for stock options granted under the plan.
This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment plans for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016,
and 2015 was $37.9 million, $18.2 million, and $37.7 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the
tax deductions from option exercises totaled $5.9 million, $3.0 million, and $5.5 million, respectively, for the years
ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Meredith has an ESPP available to substantially all employees. As of January 1, 2016, the ESPP was suspended
indefinitely. The ESPP allowed employees to purchase shares of Meredith common stock through payroll
deductions at the lesser of 85 percent of the fair market value of the stock on either the first or last trading day of an
offering period. The ESPP had quarterly offering periods. One million five hundred thousand common shares were
authorized and approximately 244,000 shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP. Compensation cost
for the ESPP was based on the present value of the cash discount and the fair value of the call option component as
of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The term of the option was three months, the term

of the offering period. The expected stock price volatility was 36 percent in fiscal 2016 and 37 percent in fiscal
2015. Information about the shares issued under this plan is as follows:

Years ended June 30,
Shares issued (in thousands) ..............................
Average fair value..................................... $
Average purchase price.............................
Average market price................................

2016
45
6.77
35.94
42.91

2015
72
7.52
39.95
50.83

12. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

The Company occupies certain facilities and sales offices and uses certain equipment under lease agreements.
Rental expense for such leases was $20.1 million in fiscal 2017, $20.9 million in fiscal 2016, and $20.1 million in
fiscal 2015.

Below are the minimum rental commitments at June 30, 2017, under all noncancelable operating leases due in
succeeding fiscal years:

Years ending June 30,

(In thousands)
2018 ..................................................................... $
2019 .....................................................................
2020 .....................................................................
2021 .....................................................................
2022 .....................................................................
Thereafter.............................................................
Total minimum rentals ......................................... $

18,401
16,828
16,562
14,163
13,281
55,429
134,664

Most of the future lease payments relate to the lease of office facilities in New York City through December 31,
2026. In the normal course of business, leases that expire are generally renewed or replaced by leases on similar
properties.

The Company has recorded commitments for broadcast rights payable in future fiscal years. The Company also is
obligated to make payments under contracts for broadcast rights not currently available for use and therefore not
included in the consolidated financial statements. Such unavailable rights amounted to $21.7 million at June 30,
2017. The fair value of these commitments for unavailable broadcast rights, determined by the present value of
future cash flows discounted at the Company's current borrowing rate, was $20.9 million at June 30, 2017.

The table shows broadcast rights payments due in succeeding fiscal years:

Years ending June 30,

(In thousands)
2018 ........................................
2019 ........................................
2020 ........................................
2021 ........................................
2022 ........................................
Thereafter................................
Total amounts payable ............

Recorded
Commitments

Unavailable
Rights

9,206
10,519
3,723
3,375
2,520
2,317
$ 31,660

$ 11,385
6,232
3,578
549
—
—
$ 21,744

The Company is involved in certain litigation and claims arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of
management, liabilities, if any, arising from existing litigation and claims are not expected to have a material effect
on the Company's earnings, financial position, or liquidity.

13. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events
and circumstances from nonowner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings as well as items of
other comprehensive income (loss).

The following table summarizes the items of other comprehensive income (loss) and the accumulated other
comprehensive loss balances:

Minimum
Pension/Post
Retirement
Liability
Adjustments

Interest
Rate
Swaps

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

(In thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2014....................................... $
Current-year adjustments, pre-tax.....................
Tax expense.......................................................
Other comprehensive loss ..........................
Balance at June 30, 2015.......................................
Current-year adjustments, pre-tax.....................
Tax benefit ........................................................
Other comprehensive loss ..........................
Balance at June 30, 2016.......................................
Current-year adjustments, pre-tax.....................
Tax benefit ........................................................
Other comprehensive income.....................

Balance at June 30, 2017....................................... $

(8,758)
(4,206)
1,615
(2,591)
(11,349)
(20,703)
7,951
(12,752)
(24,101)
8,648
(3,321)
5,327
(18,774)

— $

(2,109)
810
(1,299)
(1,299)
(5,034)
1,933
(3,101)
(4,400)
6,761
(2,596)
4,165
(235)

(8,758)
(6,315)
2,425
(3,890)
(12,648)
(25,737)
9,884
(15,853)
(28,501)
15,409
(5,917)
9,492
(19,009)

14. Fair Value Measurement

Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Specifically, it establishes a
hierarchy prioritizing the use of inputs in valuation techniques. The defined levels within the hierarchy are as
follows:

• Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
• Level 2

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly
observable;

• Level 3 Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable

pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.

The following table sets forth the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments
not measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(In thousands)
Broadcast rights payable....................................... $
Long-term debt .....................................................

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2016

Carrying
Value

31,660
700,625

Fair Value
30,544
700,714

Carrying
Value

10,173
695,000

Fair Value
9,655
695,533

The fair value of broadcast rights payable was determined using the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the Company's current borrowing rate with inputs included in Level 3. The fair value of long-term
debt was determined using the present value of expected future cash flows using borrowing rates currently available
for debt with similar terms and maturities with inputs included in Level 2.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had assets related to its qualified pension plans measured at fair value. The
required disclosures regarding such assets are presented within Note 8. In addition, the Company has liabilities
related to contingent consideration payables that are valued at estimated fair value as discussed in Note 2 and
interest rate swaps discussed in Note 6.

In fiscal 2016, the Company committed to a plan to sell the Company's two corporate airplanes. In conjunction with
that plan, the Company wrote the assets to fair value. Thus, the carrying value of these assets represented their fair
value at June 30, 2017 and 2016. During fiscal 2017, the Company fully impaired the Mywedding trademark. Thus,
the carrying value of this trademark represented its fair value at June 30, 2017. Additionally, during fiscal 2016, the
Company took impairment charges on the American Baby trademark and on goodwill in the MXM reporting unit.
Thus, the carrying value of these assets represented their fair value at June 30, 2016. For further discussion on the
trademark and goodwill impairment charges, refer to Note 4. The Company does not have any other assets or
liabilities recognized at fair value.

The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(In thousands)
Machinery and equipment

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2016

Corporate airplanes, held for sale.................... $

1,927

2,800

Other assets

Interest rate swaps ...........................................

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Contingent consideration.................................
Interest rate swaps ...........................................

Other noncurrent liabilities

Contingent consideration.................................
Interest rate swaps ...........................................

158

4,000
602

30,211
—

—

—
2,768

56,631
4,511

The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined based on discounted cash flows derived using market observable
inputs including swap curves that are included in Level 2. The fair value of the contingent consideration and the
corporate airplanes is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents Level 3
measurements.

The following table sets forth the assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

(In thousands)
Trademarks 1 ........................................................ $
Goodwill 2 ............................................................

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2016

—

54,910

1 Represents the fair value of the trademarks that were fully impaired during fiscal 2017 and 2016.

For further discussion, refer to Note 4.

2 Fair value of the MXM reporting unit's goodwill after impairment taken during fiscal 2016. Not
considered to be measured at fair value for fiscal 2017. For further discussion, refer to Note 4.

Based on the respective impairment analyses, the trademarks were deemed to be fully impaired and thus were
written off. The valuations of the trademarks represents Level 3 measurements. The fair value of the goodwill is
determined based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement.
The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the MXM reporting unit consisted primarily of significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value inputs), including discount rates, estimated cash flows, profit margins, and
growth rates. The discount rate used to determine the fair value of the MXM reporting unit is based on several
factors including market interest rates, a weighted average cost of capital analysis based on the target capital
structure, and includes adjustments for market risk and company specific risk. Estimated cash flows are based upon
internally developed estimates and the growth rates and profit margins are based on industry knowledge and
historical performance.

The following table represents the changes in the fair value of Level 3 contingent consideration, corporate airplanes,
trademarks, and goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)
Contingent consideration
Balance at beginning of year ................................................... $
Additions due to acquisitions...................................................
Payments..................................................................................
Change in present value of contingent consideration 1............
Balance at end of year

Corporate airplanes 2
Balance at beginning of year ................................................... $
Fair market value adjustment of corporate airplanes...............
Balance at end of year.............................................................. $

56,631
7,681
(10,581)

(19,520)
34,211

2,800
(873)
1,927

Trademarks 3
Balance at beginning of year ................................................... $

5,300

Impairment...............................................................................

(5,300)

Balance at end of year.............................................................. $

— $

61,535
—
(800)

(4,104)
56,631

8,439
(5,639)
2,800

38,874

(38,874)

—

Goodwill 4
Balance at beginning of year ................................................... $

Impairment...............................................................................

— $

171,859

—

(116,949)

Balance at end of year.............................................................. $

— $

54,910

1 Change in present value of contingent consideration is included in earning and comprised of changes in estimated
earn out payments based on projections of performance and the amortization of the present value discount.
2 Consistent with the decision to sell the corporate airplanes, these assets were adjusted to fair value.

3 Represents the fair value of trademarks, which were fully impaired during fiscal 2017 and 2016. For further
discussion, refer to Note 4.
4 Fair value of the MXM reporting unit's goodwill after impairment taken during fiscal 2016. Not considered to be
measured at fair market value for fiscal 2017. For further discussion, refer to Note 4.

15. Financial Information about Industry Segments

Meredith is a diversified media company focused primarily on service journalism. On the basis of products and
services, the Company has established two reportable segments: national media and local media. The national
media segment includes magazine publishing, customer relationship marketing, digital and mobile media, brand
licensing, database-related activities, and other related operations. The local media segment consists primarily of
the operations of network-affiliated television stations. Virtually all of the Company's revenues are generated in the
U.S. and substantially all of the assets reside within the U.S. There are no material intersegment transactions.

There are two principal financial measures reported to the chief executive officer (the chief operating decision
maker) for use in assessing segment performance and allocating resources. Those measures are operating profit and
EBITDA. Operating profit for segment reporting, disclosed below, is revenues less operating costs and unallocated

corporate expenses. Segment operating expenses include allocations of certain centrally incurred costs such as
employee benefits, occupancy, information systems, accounting services, internal legal staff, and human resources
administration. These costs are allocated based on actual usage or other appropriate methods, primarily number of
employees. Unallocated corporate expenses are corporate overhead expenses not attributable to the operating
groups. Interest income and expense are not allocated to the segments. In accordance with authoritative guidance on
disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information, EBITDA is not presented below.

Significant non-cash items included in segment operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization of
fixed and intangible assets is the amortization of broadcast rights in the local media segment. Broadcast rights
amortization totaled $17.6 million in fiscal 2017, $16.7 million in fiscal 2016, and $16.6 million in fiscal 2015.

Segment assets include intangible, fixed, and all other non-cash assets identified with each segment. Jointly used
assets such as office buildings and information technology equipment are allocated to the segments by appropriate
methods, primarily number of employees. Unallocated corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash items,
assets allocated to or identified with corporate staff departments, and other miscellaneous assets not assigned to a
segment.

The following table presents financial information by segment:

Years ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)
Revenues
National media.................................................. $ 1,083,200
Local media.......................................................
630,161
Total revenues ................................................... $ 1,713,361

Segment profit (loss)
National media.................................................. $
Local media.......................................................
Unallocated corporate .......................................
Income from operations ....................................
Interest expense, net..........................................
Earnings before income taxes ........................... $

146,541
214,920
(52,338)
309,123
(18,789)
290,334

Depreciation and amortization
National media.................................................. $
Local media.......................................................
Unallocated corporate .......................................
Total depreciation and amortization ................. $

17,555
34,818
1,519
53,892

$ 1,101,183
548,445
$ 1,649,628

$ 1,059,852
534,324
$ 1,594,176

(17,693)
158,481
(10,179)
130,609
(20,402)
110,207

18,698
38,332
2,122
59,152

122,681
162,677
(43,246)
242,112
(19,352)
222,760

17,186
37,521
1,839
56,546

Assets
National media.................................................. $ 1,487,070
1,124,853
Local media.......................................................
Unallocated corporate .......................................
117,700
Total assets ........................................................ $ 2,729,623

$ 1,478,243
1,054,311
94,237
$ 2,626,791

$ 1,665,542
1,072,152
105,588
$ 2,843,282

Capital expenditures
National media.................................................. $
Local media.......................................................
Unallocated corporate .......................................
Total capital expenditures ................................. $

4,507
12,165
18,113
34,785

4,739
17,250
3,046
25,035

4,829
23,224
5,192
33,245

16. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

Year ended June 30, 2017

(In thousands except per share data)
Revenues
National media........................................... $
Local media ...............................................
Total revenues............................................ $
Operating profit
National media........................................... $
Local media ...............................................
Unallocated corporate................................
Income from operations............................. $

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Total

247,293
152,586
399,879

24,111
50,622
(13,971)
60,762

259,345
183,297
442,642

46,757
76,815
(13,747)
109,825

71,805

283,351
142,069
425,420

41,314
41,164
(12,450)
70,028

39,781

293,211
152,209
445,420

$ 1,083,200
630,161
$ 1,713,361

34,359
46,319
(12,170)
68,508

43,369

146,541
214,920
(52,338)
309,123

188,928

Net earnings ............................................. $

33,973

Basic earnings per share .........................

Diluted earnings per share......................

0.76

0.75

1.61

1.58

0.89

0.87

0.97

0.95

4.23

4.16

Dividends per share .................................

0.495

0.520

2.030

In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a reduction in contingent consideration payable of
$19.6 million, a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.1 million, and $1.7 million for the write-down of an investment.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a reduction in contingent consideration payable of $1.1
million.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $5.3 million to fully
impair the Mywedding trademark, a pre-tax restructuring charge of $4.3 million, the write-down of an investment
of $1.9 million, the write-down to fair value of the Company's two airplanes of $0.9 million, and the reversal of
excess restructuring reserves accrued in prior fiscal years of $1.8 million.

As a result of changes in shares outstanding during the year, the sum of the four quarters' earnings per share may
not necessarily equal the earnings per share for the year.

Year ended June 30, 2016

(In thousands except per share data)
Revenues
National media........................................... $
Local media ...............................................
Total revenues............................................ $
Operating profit (loss)
National media........................................... $
Local media ...............................................
Unallocated corporate................................
Income (loss) from operations................... $

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Total

258,199
126,467
384,666

22,803
29,327
(23,118)
29,012

266,527
139,886
406,413

33,583
40,441
(13,911)
60,113

32,519

281,843
140,928
422,771

294,614
141,164
435,778

$ 1,101,183
548,445
$ 1,649,628

34,781
46,150
47,107
128,038

$ (108,860) $
42,563
(20,257)
(86,554) $

(17,693)
158,481
(10,179)
130,609

80,904

(90,515) $

33,937

Net earnings (loss).................................... $

11,029

Basic earnings (loss) per share................

Diluted earnings (loss) per share ............

0.25

0.24

0.73

0.72

1.81

1.79

(2.03)

0.76

0.75

Dividends per share .................................

0.4575

0.4950

1.9050

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded $12.7 million of merger-related expenses and a pre-tax
restructuring charge of $3.4 million. Also in the first quarter, the Company recorded a reduction in contingent
consideration payable of $1.4 million and $1.1 million in reversals of excess restructuring reserves accrued in prior
fiscal years.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded $3.5 million of merger-related expenses and a pre-tax
restructuring charge of $1.0 million.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company received $60.0 million of cash in conjunction with the termination
of the Media General merger. Also in the third quarter, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $3.5
million and recorded a reduction in contingent consideration payable of $1.8 million.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded an impairment of the goodwill of the national media
segment of $116.9 million, the impairment of the American Baby trademark of $38.9 million, the write-down to fair
value of the Company's two airplanes of $5.7 million, a pension settlement charge of $5.6 million, and a pre-tax
restructuring charge of $2.4 million. Also in the fourth quarter, the Company recorded a reduction in contingent
consideration payable of $3.2 million and $1.7 million in reversals of excess restructuring reserves accrued in prior
fiscal years.

As a result of changes in shares outstanding during the year, the sum of the four quarters' earnings (loss) per share
may not necessarily equal the earnings per share for the year.

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL HISTORY WITH SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

2017

Years ended June 30,
(In thousands except per share data)
Results of operations
Revenues .................................................................... $ 1,713,361
1,344,173
Costs and expenses.....................................................
53,892
Depreciation and amortization ...................................
6,173
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ..
—
Merger termination fee net of merger-related costs ...
309,123
Income from operations .............................................
(18,789)
Net interest expense ...................................................
(101,406)
Income taxes...............................................................
188,928
Net earnings................................................................ $

Basic earnings per share .......................................... $

4.23

Diluted earnings per share....................................... $
Average diluted shares outstanding ........................

4.16
45,447

Other per share information
Dividends ................................................................... $
Stock price-high .........................................................
Stock price-low ..........................................................
Financial position at June 30,
Current assets ............................................................. $
Working capital ..........................................................
Total assets .................................................................
Long-term obligations (including current portion) ....
Shareholders' equity ...................................................
Number of employees at June 30, ...........................

2.030
66.25
43.85

505,253
45,583
2,729,623
729,897
995,972
3,653

2016

2015

2014

2013

$ 1,649,628
1,341,946
59,152
161,462
(43,541)
130,609
(20,402)
(76,270)
33,937

$ 1,594,176
1,294,260
56,546
1,258
—
242,112
(19,352)
(85,969)
136,791

$ 1,468,708
1,222,265
48,726
11,202
—
186,515
(12,176)
(60,798)
113,541

$ 1,471,340
1,210,061
45,350
—
5,095
210,834
(13,430)
(73,754)
123,650

0.76

0.75
45,357

1.905
53.11
35.03

481,156
3,264
2,626,791
703,679
889,043
3,790

3.07

3.02
45,323

1.780
57.22
41.95

482,531
(48,470)
2,843,282
802,774
951,850
3,878

2.54

2.50
45,410

1.680
53.84
40.11

493,122
10,019
2,543,800
723,838
891,652
3,639

2.78

2.74
45,085

1.580
48.37
29.27

407,692
(48,979)
2,140,059
359,185
854,296
3,347

This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. Over the last five fiscal
years, we have acquired a number of companies. The results of our acquired companies have been included in our
consolidated financial statements since their respective dates of acquisition. Long-term obligations include
broadcast rights payable and Company debt associated with continuing operations.

Meredith Corporation and Subsidiaries
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Reserves Deducted from Receivables in
the Consolidated Financial Statements:
(In thousands)
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2017

Additions

Balance at
beginning of
period

Charged to
costs and
expenses

Charged to
other
accounts

Deductions

Balance at
end of
period

Reserve for doubtful accounts ................... $
Reserve for returns ....................................

Total....................................................... $

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2016

Reserve for doubtful accounts ................... $
Reserve for returns ....................................

Total....................................................... $

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2015

Reserve for doubtful accounts ................... $
Reserve for returns ....................................

Total....................................................... $

7,054
1,277
8,331

6,523
1,972
8,495

5,464
2,349
7,813

4,465
3,966
8,431

4,845
3,797
8,642

5,044
4,747
9,791

— $
—
— $

(4,978) $
(3,809)
(8,787) $

(4,314) $
(4,492)
(8,806) $

(3,985) $
(5,124)
(9,109) $

6,541
1,434
7,975

7,054
1,277
8,331

6,523
1,972
8,495

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Meredith conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2017. On the basis of this evaluation, Meredith's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that Meredith files or submits under the Exchange Act are (i)
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to Meredith's management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). On
the basis of that evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
June 30, 2017.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 41.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
June 30, 2017, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item is set forth in Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on November 8, 2017, under the captions "Election of Directors," "Corporate Governance,"
"Meetings and Committees of the Board" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," and in
Part I of this Form 10-K beginning on page 10 under the caption "Executive Officers of the Company" and is
incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior
Financial Officers. These codes are applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller,
and any persons performing similar functions. The Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the
Company's Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers are available free of charge on the Company's
corporate website at meredith.com. Copies of the codes are also available free of charge upon written request to the
Secretary of the Company. The Company will post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
and the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers, as well as any waivers that are required to be
disclosed by the rules of either the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the New York Stock Exchange on
the Company's corporate website.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders of the Company may recommend
nominees to the Company's Board of Directors.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is set forth in Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on November 8, 2017, under the captions "Compensation Discussion and Analysis,"
"Compensation Committee Report," "Summary Compensation Table," "Director Compensation," and
"Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Certain information required by this Item is set forth in Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on November 8, 2017, under the captions "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plans” is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is set forth in Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on November 8, 2017, under the captions "Related Person Transaction Policy and
Procedures" and "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is set forth in Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on November 8, 2017, under the caption "Audit Committee Disclosure" and is incorporated
herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following consolidated financial statements listed under (a) 1. and the financial statement schedule listed under
(a) 2. of the Company and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this report as set forth in the Index on page 40
(Item 8).

(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedule, and Exhibits

1. Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Five-Year Financial History with Selected Financial Data

2. Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other Schedules have been omitted because the items required by such schedules are not present in
the consolidated financial statements, are covered in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto, or are not significant in amount.

3. Exhibits

Certain of the exhibits to this Form 10-K are incorporated herein by reference, as specified:
(See Index to Attached Exhibits on page E-1of this Form 10-K.)

3.1

3.2

4.1

The Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2003.

The Restated Bylaws, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015.

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of February 29, 2012, among Meredith Corporation, as
issuer and seller, and named purchasers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 1, 2012.

4.2

4.3

4.4

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of February 19, 2014, among Meredith Corporation, as
issuer and seller, and named purchasers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 28, 2014.

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 30, 2016, among Meredith
Corporation and a group of banks including Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender, and L/C Issuer.is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2016.

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of October 31, 2014, among Meredith Corporation, as
issuer and seller, and named purchasers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014.

10.1

Indemnification Agreement in the form entered into between the Company and its officers
and directors is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 1988.*

10.2 Meredith Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of November 8, 1993, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 1993.*

10.3 Meredith Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 2002, as amended, is incorporated

herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
November 13, 2012.*

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of April 9, 2002 among Meredith Corporation, as Sole
Initial Originator and Meredith Funding Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Meredith
Corporation), as buyer is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002.

Parent Guarantee from Meredith Corporation dated as of April 25, 2011, is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2011.

First Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of April 25, 2011,
among Meredith Funding Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Meredith Corporation)
as Seller, Meredith Corporation, as Servicer, Falcon Asset Securitization Company LLC, The
Financial Institutions from time to time party hereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011. First amendment dated as of
September 21, 2012, to the aforementioned agreement is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2012. Second Amendment dated as of February 18, 2015, to the
aforementioned agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015. Third
amendment dated as of October 21, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015.

Amended and Restated Replacement Benefit Plan effective January 1, 2001, is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.*

Amended and Restated Supplemental Benefit Plan effective January 1, 2001, is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.*

10.9 Meredith Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2008.*

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between Meredith Corporation and the
named employee for the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2004.*

Form of Continuing Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors under the Company's Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011.*

Employment Agreement dated January 20, 2006, and re-executed August 24, 2009, between
Meredith Corporation and Stephen M. Lacy is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
First amendment to the aforementioned agreement is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2009.*

Employment Agreement dated August 10, 2016, between Meredith Corporation and
Thomas H. Harty is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2016.*

Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2015, between Meredith Corporation and Paul
Karpowicz is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed June 5, 2015. First amendment to the aforementioned agreement is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8‑K filed August 12, 2016.*

Employment Agreement dated August 10, 2016, between Meredith Corporation and
Jonathan B. Werther is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2016.*

Employment Agreement dated August 14, 2008, and re-executed August 24, 2009, between
Meredith Corporation and John S. Zieser is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.*

Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2015, between Meredith Corporation and Joseph H.
Ceryanec is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed June 5, 2015.*

10.18 Amended and Restated Severance Agreement in the form entered into between the Company
and its executive officers is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2016.*

10.19 Meredith Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 18, 2014.*

10.20

Form of the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Employees for the 2014 Stock
Incentive Plan.*

10.21

Form of the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors for
the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.*

10.22

Form of the Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees for the 2014 Stock Incentive
Plan.*

10.23

Form of the Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors for the 2014
Stock Incentive Plan.*

10.24

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement - Time Vested for the 2014 Stock Incentive
Plan.*

10.25

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement - Performance-Based for the 2014 Stock
Incentive Plan.*

31.1

31.2

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

The Company agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, a copy of each agreement with respect to
long-term debt of the Company for which the amount authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of
the total assets of the Company on a consolidated basis.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following tables provide reconciliations of financial measures that are not in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), or non-GAAP financial measures, used in
the annual report to shareholders to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. This information is not
part of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Years ended June 30,

Diluted earnings per share.......................................... $
Special items 1 ...............................................................
Adjusted diluted earnings per share .......................... $

2017

2016

2015

2014

4.16 $

0.75 $

3.02 $

2.50 $

(0.16)

2.55

0.28

0.30

4.00 $

3.30 $

2.80 $

2013

2.74

0.17

2.91

2017

Years ended June 30,
(In thousands)
Net earnings ................................................................. $ 188,928 $ 33,937 $ 136,791 $ 113,541 $ 123,650
45,350
Depreciation and amortization ......................................
—
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets .....
13,430
Net interest expense.......................................................
Income taxes ..................................................................
73,754
Adjusted EBITDA 2 ..................................................... $ 369,188 $ 351,223 $ 299,916 $ 246,443 $ 256,184

59,152
161,462
20,402
76,270

53,892
6,173
18,789
101,406

56,546
1,258
19,352
85,969

48,726
11,202
12,176
60,798

2016

2015

2014

2013

Results excluding special items are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. While these adjusted results are not a substitute
for reported results under GAAP, management believes this information is useful as an aid in further understanding Meredith’s
current performance, performance trends, and financial condition.

●

Fiscal 2017 special items include the write-down of contingent consideration payable, the impact of the resolution of certain
federal and state tax matters, and a reduction in previously accrued restructuring charges partially offset by severance and
related benefit charges and the write-down of impaired assets.
Fiscal 2016 special items include the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, merger-related costs, severance and
related benefit costs, a pension settlement charge, and other net miscellaneous write-downs and accruals partially offset by a
merger termination fee and a reduction in previously accrued restructuring charges.
Fiscal 2015 special items include severance and related benefit costs, the write-down of impaired assets, acquisition and
disposal transaction costs, and other miscellaneous write-down and accruals.
Fiscal 2014 special items include severance and related benefit costs; the write-down of certain identifiable intangibles, fixed
assets, and art and manuscript inventory; television station acquisition transaction costs; vacated building and lease accruals;
the write-off of deferred financing costs; and other miscellaneous accruals partially offset by a tax benefit from realignment of
international operations and a reduction in previously accrued restructuring charges.
Fiscal 2013 special items include severance and related benefit costs, professional fees and expenses related to a transaction
that did not materialize, and vacated lease accruals partially offset by a reduction in previously accrued restructuring charges.

Adjusted EBITDA is net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and impairment of goodwill and other long-
lived assets.

Appendix

Financial Highlights

Years Ended June 30 (In millions except per share data)

GAAP Results

Revenues

Income from operations

Net earnings

Earnings per share

Total assets

Total debt

Non-GAAP Results

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

1,713 $

1,650 $

1,594 $

1,469 $

1,471

309

189

4.16

131

0.75

242

137

3.02

187

114

2.50

2,730

2,627

2,843

2,544

701

695

795

715

211

124

2.74

2,140

350

Adjusted earnings per share (1)

4.00 $

3.30 $

2.80 $

2.91

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

369

351

300

246

256

Revenue
5-Year CAGR: 4%

Dividend Per Share(3)
5-Year CAGR: 7%

$2,000

$1,713

$2.50

$1,650

$1,594

1,500

$1,471

$1,469

$2.08

$1.98

$2.00

$1.83

$1.73

$1.63

1,000

500

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

$ in millions

1.50

1.00

0.50

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Corporate Information

QUARTERLY INFORMATION
To receive copies of Meredith Corporation quarterly SEC
filings, earnings releases and dividend releases, please
visit meredith.com, or call 515-284-3000.

INVESTOR CONTACT
Meredith Corporation Investor Relations,
1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50309-3023,
515-284-3000, Meredith.com,
investor.relations@meredith.com

NATIONAL MEDIA

LOCAL MEDIA

Atlanta

Phoenix

St. Louis

Portland

Nashville

Hartford - New Haven

Kansas City

Greenville - Asheville

Las Vegas

Mobile - Pensacola

M O BI L E P E N S AC O LA

Flint - Saginaw

Springfield - Holyoke

Our Mission
We are Meredith Corporation, a publicly held media and marketing company founded upon service to
our customers and committed to building value for our shareholders.

Our products and services distinguish themselves on the basis of quality, customer service and value
that can be trusted.

M
e
r
e
d
i
t
h
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

2
0
1
7
A
n
n
u
a

R
e
p
o
r
t

2017 Annual Report