Quarterlytics / Real Estate / REIT - Healthcare Facilities / Medical Properties Trust

Medical Properties Trust

mpw · NYSE Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker mpw
Exchange NYSE
Sector Real Estate
Industry REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Medical Properties Trust
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2024 
ANNUAL 
REPORT

2 | Medical Properties Trust
Dear Shareholders,
Without a doubt, 2024 was the most challenging year in MPT’s history. 
Steward Health Care’s Chapter 11 events had a significant impact on our performance 
and, for the majority of the year, we were precluded from taking any meaningful 
action by the bankruptcy process and related political involvement. However, when 
we recovered control over our properties in September 2024 and re-leased them 
to several new operators, we once again proved the benefits of the business model 
we have carefully constructed over the past 20-plus years and ended the year well 
positioned to focus on our future. 
It has been gratifying to see the results of our efforts, but given the attention-
grabbing nature of headlines throughout 2024, it has been easy to overlook our 
undeniable successes, the reasons to believe in MPT’s enduring value proposition, and 
this management team’s long history of executing upon clearly communicated goals. 
In 2024, we delivered on exactly what we said we would do before the year began 
– strengthening liquidity, accelerating debt repayment and reinforcing underwritten 
asset values. And that is where we would like to begin today – by sharing the most 
relevant facts for our shareholders to assess our performance for the year:
1.	The success of our business model is best assessed over  
the long-term. MPT has a more than 20-year track record of successfully 
investing in hospital real estate. We have owned over 500 hospitals during that 
period, nearly all are still thriving in their respective communities, and very few  
have resulted in investment losses. 
2.	Our real estate underwriting has repeatedly been validated.  
We have profitably disposed of approximately $2.7 billion of real estate since 
the beginning of 2023, including the sale of our Australian hospitals and a 75% 
interest in our Utah portfolio to separate institutional investors for combined 
proceeds of approximately $1.9 billion as well as the sale of approximately $700 
million of facilities to their respective operators. Despite a uniquely challenging 
capital markets environment, the highest interest rates in nearly two decades 
and generationally high inflation, these properties were sold at prices resulting 
in significant gains. There is no better evidence of effective and knowledgeable 
underwriting. 
3.	We meaningfully outperformed our liquidity target in 2024.  
We entered 2024 with a plan to execute $2 billion in liquidity transactions. We 
exceeded that target by completing approximately $2.9 billion in real estate  
and non-real estate asset sales and sub-7% property-specific debt. 
4. We have repaid or raised sufficient liquidity to address all 
bond maturities until the fourth quarter of 2027. In early 2025, we 
issued more than $2.5 billion of 7-year secured bonds at a blended coupon of less 
than 8.0% in a vastly oversubscribed and upsized offering. Further, our long-time 
syndicate of top-tier banks recommitted to our existing $1.48 billion credit facility 
through June of 2027. The depth and breadth of investor demand for our real 
estate has been remarkable, has enabled us to strengthen our balance sheet while 
demonstrating the embedded value of our assets, and will continue to serve as a 
basis for raising attractive long-term capital. 
21
Years in Business
MPW
NYSE:LISTED
$14.3B
Total Assets
(1)
Footnotes:
(1) As of December 31, 2024.  
(2) Inclusive of all MPT properties.
(3) As of March 31, 2025.  
On the cover: Genolier Innovation Hub 
operated by Swiss Medical Network.

At the Very Heart of Healthcare.® | 3
46m
Square Foot  
Hospital Portfolio
(1,2)
50+
Industry-Leading 
Operator 
Relationships
(1)
5.	Our fourth quarter 2024 performance demonstrates strong 
underlying fundamentals. We delivered strong normalized FFO, reflecting 
a healthy dividend coverage of 2.25 times. Further, the new operators who took 
over the hospitals formerly leased to Steward have complied with terms of those 
new leases, with rents expected to ramp starting in 2025. 
STEWARD HEALTH CARE
It would be impossible to talk about 2024 without discussing Steward’s Chapter 11 
process that began in May 2024. 
Following Steward’s failure to transition even a single hospital to another operator, in 
September 2024 MPT re-established full control over 23 hospitals and severed our 
relationship with Steward. In a span of two weeks, we re-tenanted 15 facilities with a 
lease base of approximately $2 billion to four operators. Since then, three additional 
hospitals have been re-tenanted to two new operators. Put simply, MPT’s bold actions 
successfully kept 18 hospitals open and serving patients under the direction of six 
new, experienced operators. We continue to market three additional properties that 
were closed prior to the bankruptcy and two construction projects.
It is important for shareholders to understand the full scope of our financial recovery. 
In total, we invested approximately $6.5 billion in hospitals leased to Steward as well 
as debt and equity investments. Of this amount, we received roughly $4.5 billion in 
pre-bankruptcy rent and interest payments as well as proceeds from asset sale and 
joint venture transactions. Today, we have a portfolio with six new operators and a 
lease base exceeding $2.1 billion. Based on early indications, we are confident in our 
ability to begin collecting rents in 2025 and fully ramp to expected annualized cash 
rent of approximately $160 million by the fourth quarter of 2026. 
We are well positioned to more than recover our initial investment for our 
shareholders as a direct result of the meticulous real estate underwriting process  
that has served us for decades. 
From left to right: J. Kevin Hanna - Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer; R. Lucas Savage - Vice President, Head of Global Acquisitions;  
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Rosa H. Hooper - Senior Vice President of Operations and Secretary; R. Steven Hamner - Executive  
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Charles R. Lambert - Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer; and Larry H. Portal - Senior Vice President, Senior Advisor to the CEO. 
Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center 
operated by Scion Health.
Approximately

4 | Medical Properties Trust
PROSPECT MEDICAL GROUP
We also want to ensure that shareholders 
understand Prospect Medical Group’s Chapter 
11 filing in early 2025 has been a very different 
story from the start. 
We've been working collaboratively with other 
stakeholders, including quickly engaging with 
Prospect's advisers to reach a consensual 
resolution of various issues. In a short time, 
we reached a global settlement agreement 
that we expect will allow Prospect to more 
effectively market and sell its hospitals  
along with the related real estate and avoid  
the delays, uncertainty and cost of  
prolonged litigation.
LOOKING AHEAD
Despite the challenges presented in 2024, 
we have never been more confident in the 
importance of our business model. Hospitals 
need access to affordable, permanent capital 
to fund investments in patient services, 
expansions of and enhancements to facilities, 
hiring, and cutting-edge technologies and 
equipment – each of which is geared towards 
caring for patients. Sale-leasebacks are a 
relatively inexpensive financing alternative 
compared to other choices like debt and 
traditional equity, and they offer the ability 
to convert 100% of the value of a hospital’s 
real estate into immediate liquidity. MPT’s 
arrangements with tenants are designed to 
provide hospital operators with predictability, 
stability and control. 
General Acute Care
59.4%
Behavioral Health 
16.7%
Other
11.8%
Post Acute Care
11.3%
Freestanding ER 
and Urgent Care
0.8% 
GLOBAL PORTFOLIO MIX (1)
396
Hospital Properties(1)
INVESTMENTS BY COUNTRY (1)
Spain 
1.7%
All Other Countries and 
International Assets 
8.5% 	
Germany 
4.7%
Switzerland
5.0%
United Kingdom 
27.9% 
United States 
52.2%
14.3B
INVESTED (1)
“We are entering 2025 
with a great deal of 
confidence in our ability 
to continue to execute 
our strategy.”
We are entering 2025 with a great deal of 
confidence in our ability to continue to 
execute our strategy. With the vast majority of 
our portfolio expected to generate predictable 
rent payments, rebounding cash rent from 
recently transitioned facilities, and our debt 
maturities addressed for the next two and a 
half years, the future is bright for MPT.

At the Very Heart of Healthcare.® | 5
	 AUGUST 2024 
MPT sells 11 Colorado  
facilities for $86 million
	 MAY 2024  
MPT closes $800 million 
10-year loan secured by 
U.K. hospital portfolio
	 JULY 2024 MPT sells the 50-bed Arizona General  
Hospital in Mesa, AZ and seven freestanding  
emergency department (“FSED”) facilities in the Phoenix 
metropolitan area to Dignity Health, a wholly-owned 
subsidiary of CommonSpirit Health, for $160 million
    SEPTEMBER 2024 / EARLY 2025 
Operations of 18 former  
Steward hospitals transitioned  
to six new operators
RECENT TRANSACTIONS (3)
The essential promise of MPT’s business model is as true today 
as the day we launched more than twenty years ago – delivering 
compelling returns to our shareholders and providing hospital 
operators access to the same affordable capital solutions that 
are prevalent in other sectors of the economy, ensuring millions 
of people around the world have access to quality healthcare in 
their communities. 
	 FEBRUARY 2025 MPT completed a private 
offering of $1.5 billion in aggregate principal 
amount of its senior secured notes due 2032 
and €1.0 billion aggregate principal amount  
of its senior secured notes due 2032
Thank you as always for your unwavering support and patience. 
 
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

6 | Medical Properties Trust
REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 
OF NORTHWEST OHIO
Opened in 2016, Rehabilitation Hospital of Northwest 
Ohio complements Ernest Health's 1,357-bed hospital 
network. The role of rehabilitation and specialty care 
hospitals in the U.S. continues to grow to meet the needs 
of an aging population.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning 
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements 
can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, 
“will”, “would”, “could”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “estimate”, “target”, “anticipate”, 
“believe”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “guidance” or other similar words, and include 
statements regarding our strategies, objectives, asset sales and other liquidity 
transactions (including the use of proceeds thereof), expected re-tenanting 
of facilities and any related regulatory approvals, and expected outcomes 
from Prospect’s Chapter 11 restructuring process. Forward-looking statements 
involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual 
results or future events to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying 
such forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: (i) the risk 
that the outcome and terms of the bankruptcy restructuring of Prospect will 
not be consistent with those anticipated by the Company; (ii) our success in 
implementing our business strategy and our ability to identify, underwrite, 
finance, consummate and integrate acquisitions and investments; (iii) the risk 
that previously announced or contemplated property sales, loan repayments, 
and other capital recycling transactions do not occur as anticipated or at all; (iv) 
the risk that MPT is not able to attain its leverage, liquidity and cost of capital 
objectives within a reasonable time period or at all; (v) MPT’s ability to obtain 
or modify the terms of debt financing on attractive terms or at all, as a result 
of changes in interest rates and other factors, which may adversely impact its 
ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend its indebtedness as it becomes 
due, or pursue acquisition and development opportunities; (vi) the ability of our 
tenants, operators and borrowers to satisfy their obligations under their respective 
contractual arrangements with us; (vii) the ability of our tenants and operators 
to operate profitably and generate positive cash flow, remain solvent, comply 
with applicable laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to 
deliver high-quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract 
patients; (viii) the risk that we are unable to monetize our investments in certain 
tenants at full value within a reasonable time period or at all; and (ix) the risks and 
uncertainties of litigation or other regulatory proceedings.
 
The risks described above are not exhaustive and additional factors could adversely 
affect our business and financial performance, including the risk factors discussed 
under the section captioned “Risk Factors” in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and 
our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and as may be updated in our other filings 
with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual 
performance or outcomes may vary materially from any forward-looking statements 
and the assumptions on which those statements are based. Readers are cautioned 
to not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as predictions of future 
events. We disclaim any responsibility to update such forward-looking statements, 
which speak only as of the date on which they were made.
Rehabilitation Hospital of Northwest Ohio 
Operated by Ernest Health

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
or
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 001-32559
Commission file number 333-177186
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland
Delaware
20-0191742
20-0242069
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501
Birmingham, AL
35242
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
(205) 969-3755
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
MPW
The New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Yes ☐
No ☒
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Yes ☐
No ☒
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Yes ☒
No ☐
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Yes ☒
No ☐
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Large accelerated filer
☒
Accelerated filer
☐
Non-accelerated filer
☐
Smaller reporting company
☐
Emerging growth company
☐
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Large accelerated filer
☐
Accelerated filer
☐
Non-accelerated filer
☒
Smaller reporting company
☐
Emerging growth company
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards
provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to
previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in 12b-2 of the Act).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Yes ☐
No ☒
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Yes ☐
No ☒
As of June 30, 2024, the aggregate market value of the 593.8 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), held by non-affiliates of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
was $2.6 billion based upon the last reported sale price of $4.31 on the New York Stock Exchange on that date. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of Medical
Properties Trust, Inc. have been deemed affiliates.
As of February 28, 2025, 600.6 million shares of Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 29, 2025 are incorporated by reference into Items 10 through 14
of Part III, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, of Medical Properties Trust,
Inc., a Maryland corporation, and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, through which Medical Properties
Trust, Inc. conducts substantially all of its operations. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all
references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Medical Properties,” “MPT,” or “company” refer to Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the
context requires otherwise, all references to “operating partnership” refer to MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. together with its
consolidated subsidiaries.

3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A WARNING ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
4
PART I
ITEM 1.
Business
8
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
23
ITEM 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
40
ITEM 1C.
Cybersecurity
40
ITEM 2.
Properties
42
ITEM 3.
Legal Proceedings
44
ITEM 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
44
PART II
ITEM 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
44
ITEM 6.
[Reserved]
45
ITEM 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
46
ITEM 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
62
ITEM 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
64
ITEM 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
118
ITEM 9A.
Controls and Procedures
118
ITEM 9B.
Other Information
119
ITEM 9C.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
119
PART III
ITEM 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
120
ITEM 11.
Executive Compensation
120
ITEM 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
120
ITEM 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
120
ITEM 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
120
PART IV
ITEM 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
121
ITEM 16.
Form 10-K Summary
125
SIGNATURES
126

4
A WARNING ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Forward-looking
statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "may", "will", "would", "could", "expect",
"intend", "plan", "estimate", "target", "anticipate", "believe", "objectives", "outlook", "guidance", or other similar words. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity,
results of operations, plans, and objectives. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, are forward-looking by their
nature:
•
our business strategy;
•
our projected operating results;
•
our ability to raise funds through disposals of properties and other liquidity transactions, including our ability to dispose of
properties on favorable terms or at all;
•
our ability to raise funds through offerings of debt and equity securities and joint venture arrangements;
•
our ability to obtain future financing arrangements (including refinancing of existing financing arrangements);
•
our ability to close on any pending transactions or complete current development projects on the time schedule or terms
described or at all;
•
our ability to acquire, develop, and/or manage additional facilities in the United States (“U.S.”), Europe, South America,
or other foreign locations;
•
availability of suitable facilities to acquire or develop;
•
our ability to enter into, and the terms of, our prospective leases and loans;
•
our ability to re-lease facilities at similar rates as vacancies occur;
•
estimates relating to, and our ability to pay, future distributions;
•
our ability to service our debt and comply with all of our debt covenants;
•
our ability to compete in the marketplace;
•
lease rates and interest rates;
•
market trends;
•
projected capital expenditures; and
•
the impact of technology on our facilities, operations, and business.
Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance, taking into
account information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations can change as a result of many possible
events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of
operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. You should carefully consider these risks
before you make an investment decision with respect to our common stock and other securities, along with, among others, the
following factors that could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements:
•
macroeconomic conditions, including due to geopolitical conditions and instability, which may lead to a disruption of or
lack of access to the capital markets, disruptions and instability in the banking and financial services industries, rising
inflation and movements in currency exchange rates, and may negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants;
•
the risk that property sales, loan repayments, and other capital recycling transactions do not occur as anticipated or at all,
including the transactions described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K;
•
the risk that the outcome and terms of the bankruptcy restructurings of affiliates of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc.
(collectively, "Prospect") will not be consistent with those we anticipate and the risk that we are unable to recover the
value of our real estate and other investments in the Prospect portfolio as a result of the bankruptcy restructuring, within a
reasonable timeframe or at all;
•
the risk that we are unable to successfully re-tenant or sell the remaining former Steward Health Care System ("Steward")
hospitals, on the terms we expect or at all;

5
•
the risk that governments may exercise powers adverse to our ownership and other rights in our properties;
•
the risk that we are not able to attain our leverage, liquidity, and cost of capital objectives within a reasonable time period
or at all;
•
our ability to obtain debt financing on attractive terms or at all, as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors,
which may adversely impact our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure, or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due,
or pursue acquisition and development opportunities;
•
our ability to remain in compliance with our financial covenants under our debt facilities and obtain additional debt
covenant relief under our Credit Facility;
•
any downgrades in our credit ratings;
•
the ability of our tenants, operators, and borrowers (including those of our joint ventures) to satisfy their obligations under
their respective contractual arrangements with us;
•
the ability of our tenants and operators to operate profitably and generate positive cash flow, remain solvent, comply with
applicable laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to deliver high-quality services, to attract and
retain qualified personnel, and to attract patients;
•
the cooperation of our joint venture partners, including adverse developments affecting the financial health of such joint
venture partners or the joint venture itself;
•
the economic, political and social impact of, and uncertainty relating to, the potential impact from epidemics, pandemics
or other public health crises (like COVID-19), which may adversely affect our and our tenants’ business, financial
condition, results of operations, and liquidity;
•
our success in implementing our business strategy and our ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummate, and
integrate acquisitions and investments;
•
the nature and extent of our current and future competition;
•
factors affecting the real estate industry generally or the healthcare real estate industry in particular;
•
our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for income tax purposes in the U.S. and United
Kingdom ("U.K.");
•
changes in federal, state, or local tax laws in the U.S., Europe, South America, or other jurisdictions in which we may own
healthcare facilities or transact business;
•
federal and state healthcare and other regulatory requirements, as well as those in the foreign jurisdictions where we own
properties;
•
the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain
equity or debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis;
•
loss of property owned through ground leases upon breach or termination of the ground leases;
•
potential environmental contingencies and other liabilities;
•
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
•
the risks and uncertainties of litigation or other regulatory proceedings and investigations;
•
the accuracy of our methodologies and estimates regarding corporate responsibility metrics and targets, tenant willingness
and ability to collaborate towards reporting such metrics and meeting such goals and targets, and the impact of
governmental regulation on our and our tenants’ corporate responsibility efforts; and
•
other factors referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including those set forth under the sections captioned “Risk
Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Business.”
Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to update such statements or to publicly announce the result of any
revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

6
SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
Set forth below is a summary of the risks described under Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Report on Form 10-K.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS, TENANTS, AND STRATEGY
•
Adverse U.S. and global market, economic and political conditions, health crises and other events beyond our control could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
•
Our revenues are dependent upon our relationships with and success of our tenants, particularly our largest tenants, like Circle,
Priory, HSA, Lifepoint Behavioral, and Swiss Medical Network.
•
We have made investments in certain operators of our healthcare facilities and the cash flows (and related returns) from these
investments are subject to more volatility than our properties with the traditional net leasing structure.
•
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants or investees could harm our operating results and financial condition.
•
Declines in the fair value of our assets may force us to recognize impairment charges, which could adversely impact our
financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations.
•
It may be costly to replace defaulting tenants and we may not find suitable replacements on suitable terms.
•
It may be costly to find new tenants when lease terms end, and we may not be able to replace such tenants with suitable
replacements on suitable terms.
•
We have experienced rapid growth over the years, from adding new tenants to expanding our global footprint, and our failure to
effectively manage our growth may adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows, which could negatively affect our
ability to service our debt and make distributions.
•
We have less experience with healthcare facilities located outside the U.S.
•
We and our tenants have exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could impact profitability.
•
Our business is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully.
•
Many of our tenants have an option to purchase the facilities we lease to them, which could disrupt our operations.
•
Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the healthcare industry may result in a change of control of, or a competitor’s
investment in, one or more of our tenants or operators, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
•
Our investments in joint ventures could be adversely affected by our lack of control, our partners’ failure to meet their
obligations, and disputes with our partners.
•
Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, employees, and other stakeholders regarding our corporate
responsibility practices and reporting could cause us to incur additional costs, devote additional resources, and expose us to
additional risks, which could adversely impact our reputation, tenant and employee acquisition and retention, and access to
capital.
FINANCING RISKS
•
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and may otherwise adversely impact our business operations
and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
•
Covenants in our debt instruments limit our operational flexibility, and a breach of these covenants could materially affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
•
Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
•
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile and may decline regardless of our operating
performance, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
•
Future sales of common stock may have adverse effects on our stock price.
•
Downgrades in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital.
•
An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
•
As a result of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024 not being filed timely, we are currently
ineligible to file a new short-form registration statement on Form S-3 for sales of securities, including under an ATM program,
which may impair our ability to raise capital on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner or at all.
•
Limited access to capital may restrict our growth.
RISKS RELATING TO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
•
Our investments are and are expected to continue to be concentrated in a single industry segment, making us more vulnerable
economically than if our investments were more diversified.
•
Our facilities may not have efficient alternative uses, which could impede our ability to find replacement tenants in the event of
termination or default under our leases.

7
•
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of
our facilities and harm our financial condition.
•
Development and construction risks could adversely affect our ability to service debt and make distributions.
•
We may be subject to risks arising from future acquisitions of real estate.
•
Our facilities may not achieve expected results, which may harm our financial condition and operating results and our ability to
service our debt and make the distributions to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT status.
•
We may suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of our insurance coverage limits.
•
Capital expenditures for facility renovation may be greater than anticipated and may adversely impact rent payments by our
tenants and our ability to service debt and make distributions to stockholders.
•
Certain of our healthcare facilities are subject to property taxes that may increase in the future and adversely affect our business.
•
As the owner and lessor of real estate, we are subject to risks under environmental laws, the cost of compliance with which and
any violation of which could materially adversely affect us.
•
Our interests in facilities through ground leases expose us to the loss of the facility upon breach or termination of the ground
lease, may limit our use of the facility, and may result in additional expense to us if our tenants vacate our facility.
RISKS RELATING TO THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY
•
The continued pressure on healthcare reimbursement in the U.S. and other countries in which we do business, including shifts
from fee-for-service reimbursement towards alternative payment models, other healthcare policy reforms and government cost
cutting measures, could adversely affect the profitability of our tenants and hinder their ability to make payments to us.
•
Significant regulation and loss of licensure or certification or failure to obtain licensure or certification could negatively impact
our tenants' financial condition and results of operations and affect their ability to make payments to us.
•
Our tenants are subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make
payments to us and adversely affect their profitability.
•
Certain of our lease arrangements may be subject to laws related to fraud and abuse or physician self-referrals.
•
We may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make our healthcare properties suitable for other tenants.
•
State certificate of need laws may adversely affect our development of facilities and the operations of our tenants.
•
Regulatory restrictions on REIT transactions could adversely affect our business.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
•
We depend on key personnel, the loss of any one of whom may threaten our ability to operate our business successfully.
•
Pursuant to Maryland law, our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of deterring changes in
management and third-party acquisition proposals, which in turn could depress the price of our common stock or cause dilution.
•
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security failure of
our technology (or that of our third-party vendors) could harm our business.
•
Unfavorable resolution of pending and future litigation, regulatory proceedings, or governmental inquiries could have a material
adverse effect on our and our tenants' business, results of operations, financial condition, and reputation.
•
Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely affect us and the reported financial performance of our tenants.
TAX RISKS
•
Loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our common stock.
•
Failure to make required distributions as a REIT would increase our tax burden.
•
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
•
If certain sale-leaseback transactions are not characterized by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or similar tax authorities
internationally as “true leases,” we may be subject to adverse tax consequences.
•
Transactions with TRSs may be subject to excise tax.
•
Loans to our tenants could be characterized as equity, in which case our income from that tenant might not be qualifying income
under the REIT rules and we could lose our REIT status.
•
Certain transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.
•
Changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations, including changes to tax rates, may adversely affect our results of operations.

8
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
Overview
We are a self-advised REIT formed in 2003 to acquire and develop net-leased healthcare facilities. At December 31, 2024, we
had investments in 396 facilities and approximately 39,000 licensed beds in 31 states in the U.S., seven countries in Europe, and
Colombia in South America. We have operated as a REIT since April 6, 2004, and accordingly, elected REIT status upon the filing of
our calendar year 2004 federal income tax return. Medical Properties Trust, Inc. was incorporated under Maryland law on August 27,
2003, and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. was formed under Delaware law on September 10, 2003. We conduct substantially all of
our business through MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Our primary business strategy is to acquire and develop healthcare facilities and lease the facilities to healthcare operating
companies under long-term net leases, which require the tenant to bear most of the costs associated with the property. The majority of
our leased assets are owned 100%; however, we do own some leased assets through joint ventures with other partners that share our
view that healthcare facilities are part of the infrastructure of any community, which we refer to as investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures. We also make mortgage loans to healthcare operators collateralized by their real estate assets. In addition, we
may make loans to certain of our operators through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), the proceeds of which are typically used
for working capital and other purposes. From time-to-time, we may make noncontrolling investments in our tenants, which we refer to
as investments in unconsolidated operating entities. These investments are typically made in conjunction with larger real estate
transactions with the tenant that give us a right to a share in such tenant’s profits and losses, and provide for certain minority rights
and protections. Our business model facilitates acquisitions and recapitalizations, and allows operators of healthcare facilities to serve
their communities by unlocking the value of their real estate assets to fund facility improvements, technology upgrades, and other
investments in operations.
Our investments in healthcare real estate, other loans, and any investments in our tenants are considered a single reportable
segment as further discussed in Note 2 of Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Assets
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, our total assets were made up of the following (dollars in thousands):
2024
2023
Real estate assets - at cost................................................................ $ 12,471,543
87.2%
$ 14,778,132
80.8%
Accumulated real estate depreciation and amortization..................
(1,422,948)
(10.0)%
(1,407,971)
(7.7)%
Cash and cash equivalents...............................................................
332,335
2.3%
250,016
1.4%
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.................
1,156,397
8.1%
1,474,455
8.0%
Investments in unconsolidated operating entities............................
439,578
3.1%
1,778,640
9.7%
Other................................................................................................
1,317,689
9.3%
1,431,572
7.8%
Total assets .................................................................................... $ 14,294,594
100.0%
$ 18,304,844
100.0%
Revenues
The following is a breakdown of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (dollars in thousands):
2024
2023
Rent billed........................................................................................ $
719,749
72.3% $
803,375
92.2%
Straight-line rent..............................................................................
163,414
16.4%
(127,894)
(14.7)%
Income from financing leases..........................................................
63,651
6.4%
127,141
14.6%
Interest and other income.................................................................
48,733
4.9%
69,177
7.9%
Total revenues(1)............................................................................. $
995,547
100.0% $
871,799
100.0%
(1)
Total 2023 revenues include approximately $459 million of reserves for rent billed, straight-line rent, and interest and
other income, primarily related to Steward, as discussed in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
See “Overview” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of transaction and other activity for 2024 and 2023.

9
Portfolio of Properties
As of February 28, 2025, our portfolio consisted of 393 properties: 373 facilities are leased to 52 tenants, along with others in
the form of developments and mortgage loans, and less than 1% of total assets that are not currently leased to a tenant, as discussed in
Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Of our portfolio of properties, 105 facilities are owned by way of our five
unconsolidated real estate joint venture arrangements in which we share control with our joint venture partners. Our facilities consist
of 173 general acute care hospitals, 69 behavioral health facilities, 130 post acute care facilities, and 21 freestanding ER/urgent care
facilities (“FSERs”).
See Item 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our properties.
Outlook and Strategy
Our strategy is to lease the facilities that we acquire or develop to experienced healthcare operators pursuant to long-term net
leases. In addition, we may selectively structure certain of our investments as long-term, interest-only mortgage loans to healthcare
operators. Our mortgage loans are typically structured such that we obtain annual cash returns similar to our net leases. In addition, we
have obtained and may continue to obtain profits or other interests in certain of our tenants’ operations. These noncontrolling
investments in our tenants are typically made in conjunction with larger real estate transactions, provide for certain minority rights and
protections, and sometimes give us a right to participate in future real estate transactions and enhance our overall return.
The market for healthcare real estate is extensive and includes real estate owned by a variety of healthcare operators. For
example, according to the 2025 American Hospital Association statistics report, there were approximately 5,100 community hospitals
in 2023 throughout the U.S. We typically acquire and develop net-leased facilities that focus on the most critical components of
healthcare. We typically invest in facilities that have the highest intensity of care including:
•
General acute care hospitals — provide inpatient and outpatient care for the treatment of acute conditions and
manifestations of chronic conditions, illnesses, or injuries including both surgical and non-surgical
treatments/interventions. This type of facility also provides ambulatory care through onsite emergency rooms.
•
Behavioral health facilities — specialty facilities focused on the treatment of mental, social, and even physical illnesses,
while promoting the health and well-being of the body, mind, and spirit. Behavioral health services range in acuity of care
from outpatient therapy and drug and alcohol rehabilitation services to secured, inpatient mental health hospital care.
•
Post acute care facilities — includes a) inpatient rehabilitation facilities that provide rehabilitation to patients with various
neurological, musculoskeletal orthopedic, and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical
issues and b) long-term acute care hospitals that are specialty-care hospitals designed for patients with serious medical
problems that require intense, specialized treatment for an extended period of time, sometimes requiring a hospital stay
averaging in excess of three weeks.
•
FSERs — provide emergency medical services comparable to most hospital emergency rooms, while not physically
attached to a hospital campus. Urgent care centers operate similarly, but generally provide care for non-emergent injuries
and illnesses.

10
On a property type basis, our total assets at December 31, 2024 are as follows:
Diversification
A fundamental component of our business plan is the continued diversification of our portfolio. We monitor diversification in
several ways, including concentration in any one facility. We believe facility level diversification is important because if an individual
facility is needed in the community and has support from local physicians and others in the community, its operations will generally
be successful regardless of who the operator is (see "Underwriting/Asset Management" section below for performance indicators we
look for at the facility level). Other ways we monitor diversification include our tenant relationships, the types of hospitals we own,
and the geographic areas in which we invest.
At December 31, 2024, our largest investment in any single property was approximately 2% of our total assets. From a tenant
relationship perspective, see section titled “Significant Tenants” below for detail. See sections titled “Portfolio of Properties” and
“Outlook and Strategy” above for information on the diversification of our hospital types. From a geographical perspective, we have
investments across the U.S. and in Europe and South America. See Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more
detail on our geographic concentration information.
Underwriting/Asset Management
Revenues from rents we earn pursuant to lease agreements with our tenants make up approximately 95% of our total revenues
with the remainder of our income coming from interest income from loans to our tenants and other facility owners and from profits or
equity interests in certain of our tenants’ operations. Our tenants operate in the healthcare industry, generally providing medical,
surgical, rehabilitative, and behavioral health care to patients. The capacity of our tenants to pay our rents and interest is dependent
upon their ability to conduct their operations at profitable levels. We believe that the business environment of the industry segments in
which our tenants operate is generally positive for efficient operators. However, our tenants’ operations are impacted by economic,
regulatory, healthcare, and market conditions (along with the possibility of natural disasters, epidemics, pandemics, or other public
health crises, like COVID-19) that may affect their profitability, which could impact our results. Accordingly, we monitor certain key
performance indicators (based on available data provided by our tenants/borrowers) that we believe provides us with early indications
of conditions that could affect the level of risk in our portfolio.
Key factors that we may consider in underwriting prospective deals and in our ongoing monitoring of our tenants’ (and
guarantors’) performance, as well as the condition of our properties, include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
the scope and breadth of clinical services and programs, including utilization trends (both inpatient and outpatient) by
service type;
•
the size and composition of medical staff and physician leadership at our facilities, including specialty, tenure, and
number of procedures performed and/or referrals;
•
an evaluation of our operators’ management team, as applicable, including background and tenure within the healthcare
industry;
•
staffing trends, including ratios, turnover metrics, recruitment and retention strategies at corporate and individual facility
levels;
General Acute Care Hospitals
Behavioral Health Facilities
Post Acute Care Facilities
Freestanding ER/Urgent Care Facilities
Other
59%
17%
11%
12%
1%
TOTAL ASSETS BY ASSET TYPE

11
•
facility operating performance measured by current, historical, and prospective operating margins (measured by a tenant's
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, management fees, and facility rent) of each tenant and at each
facility;
•
the ratio of our tenants' operating earnings to facility rent and to other fixed costs, including debt costs;
•
changes in revenue sources of our tenants, including the relative mix of public payors (including Medicare,
Medicaid/MediCal, and managed care in the U.S., as well as equivalent payors in Europe, and South America) and private
payors (including commercial insurance and private pay patients);
•
historical support (financial or otherwise) from governments and/or other public payor systems during major economic
downturns/depressions;
•
trends in tenants' cash collections, including comparison to recorded net patient service revenues, knowing and assessing
current revenue cycle management systems and potential future planned upgrades or replacements;
•
tenants' free cash flow;
•
the potential impact of healthcare pandemics/epidemics, legislation, and other regulations (including changes in
reimbursement) on our tenants', borrowers', and guarantors' profitability and liquidity;
•
the potential impact of any legal, regulatory, or compliance proceedings with our tenants (including at the facility level);
•
the potential impact of supply chain and inflation-related challenges as they relate to new developments or capital addition
projects;
•
an ongoing assessment of the operating environment of our tenants, including demographics, competition, market
position, status of compliance, accreditation, quality performance, and health outcomes as measured by The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS"), The Joint Commission, and other governmental bodies in which our tenants
operate;
•
the level of investment in the hospital infrastructure and health IT systems; and
•
physical real estate due diligence, typically including property condition and Phase 1 environmental assessments, along
with routine property inspections thereafter.
In addition to the key factors above, we may analyze the physician relationships with the hospital and study admissions to
understand how broad such referrals are to the hospital. Finally, we typically address two primary questions when underwriting an
investment – 1) is this hospital truly needed in the market? and 2) would the community suffer were the hospital not there? We believe
answers to these two questions can usually provide significant insight on whether or not to move forward with a particular investment.
Healthcare Industry
The delivery of the majority of healthcare services, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere, requires real estate. The global outbreak of
COVID-19 further validated this, as hospitals during the pandemic were proven invaluable. As a consequence, healthcare providers
depend on real estate to maintain and grow their businesses. We believe that the healthcare real estate market provides investment
opportunities due to the:
•
compelling demographics driving the demand for health services;
•
specialized nature of healthcare real estate investing; and
•
consolidation of the fragmented healthcare real estate sector.
As noted previously, we have investments in nine different countries across three continents. Although there are regulatory,
cultural, and other differences between these countries, the importance of healthcare and its impact on the economy is a consistent
theme. See below for details of the healthcare industry in each of the countries in which we currently do business (according to
government sources and healthcare industry reports):
United States (population - approximately 340 million)
•
U.S. citizens receive healthcare primarily through private (via insurance carried by the individual or its employer) or
public (Medicare/Medicaid) payors.

12
•
U.S. currently ranks highest in overall health expenditure in the world with $4.9 trillion in 2023, or $14,570 per person.
U.S. health expenditures as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) were 16.5% in 2023.
•
In 2023, the largest share of total health spending was paid by the federal government at 32%, with individual pay at 27%,
private business funding 18%, state and local governments making up 16%, and other private sources accounting for 7%.
•
Medicare spending grew 8.1% to $1.0 trillion in 2023, or 21% of total National Health Expenditures (“NHE”).
•
Medicaid spending grew 7.9% to $871.7 billion in 2023, or 18% of total NHE.
•
Hospital expenditures grew 10.4% to $1.5 trillion in 2023.
•
Out-of-pocket spending grew 7.2% to $505.7 billion in 2023, or 10% of total NHE.
United Kingdom (population - approximately 68 million)
•
All English residents are entitled to public healthcare through the National Health Service, including hospital, physician,
and mental health care.
•
Overall health expenditures grew to £292 billion in 2023, up from £282.6 billion in 2022.
•
Health expenditures accounted for 10.9% of GDP in 2023.
•
Government-financed healthcare expenditure made up £239 billion in 2023, representing 81.9% of overall healthcare
spending.
•
Private household out-of-pocket and voluntary health insurance spending totaled £47 billion in 2023, representing 16.3%
of overall healthcare spending.
Switzerland (population - approximately 9 million)
•
Switzerland operates a universal healthcare system which is highly decentralized, with the cantons playing a key role in its
operation.
•
Health expenditures accounted for 11.7% of GDP in 2023.
•
Overall health expenditures were CHF91.5 billion in 2022, which was a 2.5% increase from 2021.
•
In 2022, hospital care represented 35.7% of total health expenditures.
Germany (population - approximately 84 million)
•
Health insurance in Germany is compulsory and consequently offers almost universal coverage.
•
Health expenditures were approximately 11.8% of GDP in 2023.
•
Health expenditures were €497.7 billion in 2023, which was a 5% increase from 2022.
•
In 2022, private health insurance accounted for 8.0% of total health expenditures.
Spain (population - approximately 49 million)
•
Spain has a public healthcare system, mainly financed by taxes, which allows residents to have access to free or very low-
cost healthcare.
•
In 2023, total health expenditures were $157.2 billion, or 9.7% of GDP.
•
In 2021, hospital care represented approximately 62% of the overall public healthcare expenditure.
•
Public spending accounted for 70.4% of all health spending in 2022.
•
Out-of-pocket payments were 20.6% in 2021.

13
Italy (population - approximately 59 million)
•
Italy’s healthcare system provides universal coverage for all citizens and legal foreign residents and is funded by
corporate and value-added tax revenues collected by the central government.
•
In 2023, total health expenditures were 8.4% of GDP, down from 9% in 2022.
•
In 2022, public spending on healthcare was €131 billion and private funding was €41.5 billion.
•
In 2023, hospital care represented approximately 41% of the overall healthcare expenditure.
Finland (population - approximately 6 million)
•
Finland's healthcare system provides public healthcare services that all residents are entitled to, which is funded by taxes
and social security payments.
•
In 2023, total health expenditures were €30, or 9.7% of GDP.
•
In 2022, public spending on healthcare accounted for 79.4% of the overall healthcare expenditure.
•
In 2021, 17% of total health spending was paid out-of-pocket.
Portugal (population - approximately 10 million)
•
Portugal provides universal health coverage to its citizens through its National Health Service, which is financed through
taxation.
•
Health spending in Portugal accounted for 10% of GDP in 2023, down from 10.6% in 2022.
•
Overall health expenditures were €26.6 billion in 2023, or €2,574 per person.
•
Public spending accounted for 63% of all health spending in 2022.
Colombia (population - approximately 52 million)
•
Colombia provides universal public and private coverage available for purchase through private companies where all
citizens are entitled to a comprehensive health benefit package.
•
In 2023, health expenditures were 7.7% of GDP, down from 8.1% in 2022.
•
In 2023, overall health expenditures were approximately $26.7 billion.
•
In 2023, 15% of total health spending was paid out-of-pocket.
Our Leases and Loans
The leases of our facilities are generally “triple-net” leases with terms requiring the tenant to pay all ongoing operating expenses
of the facility, including property, casualty, general liability, and other insurance coverages; utilities and other charges incurred in the
operation of the facilities; real estate and certain other taxes; ground lease rent (if any); and the costs of repairs and maintenance
(including any repairs mandated by regulatory requirements). Our tenants are also responsible for any desired capital expenditures
(costs that either improve the value of the facility or extend the facility's life), subject to our approval; however, if we agree to fund
such capital expenditures instead, our lease revenue will typically increase accordingly. Similarly, borrowers under our mortgage loan
arrangements retain the responsibilities of ownership, including physical maintenance and improvements and all costs and expenses.
Our leases and loans typically require our tenants to indemnify us for any past or future environmental liabilities, as well.
Our current leases and loans have a weighted-average remaining initial term of 16.7 years (see Item 2 for more information on
remaining lease and loan terms) and most include renewal options at the election of our tenants. Based on current monthly revenue,
99% of our leases provide annual rent escalations based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), or similar indexes for
properties outside the U.S. and/or fixed minimum annual rent escalations.

14
Significant Tenants
Our top five tenants, on a total asset basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Total Assets by Operator
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
Operators
Total Assets (1)
Percentage of
Total Assets
Total Assets (1)
Percentage of
Total Assets
Circle............................................................... $
2,026,778
14.2% $
2,119,392
11.6%
Priory...............................................................
1,233,462
8.6%
1,391,005
7.6%
Healthcare Systems of America......................
1,187,006
8.3%
—
—
Lifepoint Behavioral Health............................
813,584
5.7%
813,527
4.4%
Swiss Medical Network ..................................
719,632
5.1%
735,891
4.0%
Steward............................................................
—
—
3,518,537
19.2%
Prospect...........................................................
685,772
4.8%
1,092,974
6.0%
Other operators................................................
5,938,534
41.5%
6,616,121
36.2%
Other assets .....................................................
1,689,876
(2)
11.8%
2,017,397
(2)
11.0%
Total ............................................................ $
14,294,644
100.0% $
18,304,844
100.0%
(1)
Total assets by operator are generally comprised of real estate assets, mortgage loans, investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures, investments in unconsolidated operating entities, and other loans.
(2)
Includes our investment in PHP Holdings of approximately $150 million and $700 million at December 31, 2024 and
2023, respectively, that we received as part of the Prospect Transaction as further described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Circle
Affiliates of Circle Health Ltd. ("Circle") lease 36 facilities in the U.K. pursuant to separate lease agreements. Of these leases,
34 are cross-defaulted individual leases guaranteed by Circle and have initial fixed terms ending in 2050, with two five-year extension
options plus annual inflation-based escalators. The remaining two facilities are leased with a weighted-average remaining initial fixed
term of 10.6 years along with annual inflation-based escalators and extension options.
On January 12, 2024, Centene Corporation finalized the divestiture of Circle to Pure Health, the largest integrated healthcare
network in the Middle East.
Priory Group
Affiliates of Priory Group ("Priory"), a subsidiary of Median Kliniken S.á.r.l. ("MEDIAN"), lease 37 facilities in the U.K.
pursuant to separate lease agreements. Of these properties, 31 are cross-defaulted individual leases guaranteed by Priory and have
initial fixed terms ending in 2046, with two ten-year extension options plus annual inflation-based escalators. The remaining six
facilities are cross-defaulted individual leases guaranteed by Priory and have initial fixed terms ending in 2044, with annual inflation-
based escalators.
In 2024, we sold our interest in a British pound syndicated term loan with MEDIAN as the borrower ("Priory syndicated term
loan") for aggregate proceeds of £90 million.
Healthcare Systems of America
As discussed further under "Steward," we re-leased certain former Steward facilities to new operators in 2024. We re-leased
eight of these facilities (covering three states) to Healthcare Systems of America ("HSA") pursuant to one master lease agreement. The
master lease had an initial fixed term of 20 years (ending in September 2044), and contains three extension options of five years plus
inflation-based escalators. We have elected to account for this lease under the cash basis and partial cash rent payments are
contractually scheduled to commence in March of 2025 (which we received early in February 2025) with full cash rent payments in
late 2026. As part of the transfer of operations from Steward to HSA at these facilities, HSA (like the other new tenants) assumed
responsibility for the costs of operating the facilities (including payroll and related benefits) on a go forward basis. In addition, HSA
(like the other new operators that took over former Steward-operated facilities) entered into an interim transition services agreement
with Steward to, among other things, assist with billing and collection. To assist HSA during this transition process and minimize
disruptions to patient care, we advanced a loan to HSA (similar to the other new operators), secured by accounts receivable. This loan

15
is expected to be repaid upon HSA’s completion of an asset-backed working capital loan with third party lenders. Similar to lease
accounting, we will recognize revenue under this loan on a cash basis, and no cash payments were received during 2024.
Lifepoint Behavioral Health
Lifepoint Behavioral Health ("Lifepoint Behavioral") leases 19 facilities pursuant to one master lease agreement. The master
lease's original initial fixed term was 20 years (ending in October 2041), and contains two extension options of five years plus
inflation-based escalators.
Swiss Medical Network
Affiliates of Swiss Medical Network (“Swiss Medical”) lease 17 facilities in Switzerland under individual leases through our
Infracore SA real estate joint venture (“Infracore”), in which we hold a 70% non-controlling interest as of December 31, 2024, and
have two facilities under development that are not yet leased. The weighted-average remaining term of these leases at December 31,
2024 was 26 years. These leases are subject to annual inflation-based escalators. In 2024, Swiss Medical began leasing the Genolier
Innovation Hub, a newly constructed facility designed to accelerate medical and scientific innovation through international
collaboration. The Genolier Innovation Hub is part of the real estate assets owned by Infracore.
In addition, we hold an 8.9% passive equity ownership interest in Swiss Medical Network and hold a loan as part of a
syndicated loan facility for a combined total of approximately $170 million at December 31, 2024. Swiss Medical’s parent is Aevis
Victoria SA (“Aevis”), a public healthcare, lifestyle, and infrastructure investment company that also has interest in Infracore. We
hold a passive 4.6% equity interest in Aevis at December 31, 2024.
Other Significant Tenants
Steward
As discussed in previous filings, Steward experienced significant operational and liquidity challenges and filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy on May 6, 2024 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. On September 11, 2024, the
bankruptcy court entered an interim order approving a global settlement between Steward, its lenders, the unsecured creditors
committee, and us. The interim order was made final by the bankruptcy court on September 18, 2024. The order provided for the
following: a) termination of our master lease with Steward; b) the release of claims against 23 of our properties, allowing us to begin
the process of re-tenanting these facilities, which we did as discussed further in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and c) a full release of claims against us from all parties. In return, we consented to the sale of the operations and our real estate in
three facilities in the Space Coast region of Florida with a substantial portion of the proceeds being transferred to Steward, along with
a full release of our claims in Steward including claims to past due rent and interest, outstanding loans, and our equity investment. In
regard to our real estate partnership with Macquarie Asset Management (“Macquarie”), the bankruptcy court approved the termination
of the partnership’s master lease with Steward during the 2024 third quarter. In addition, we and Macquarie entered into an agreement
with the mortgage lender of the partnership to transition the eight Massachusetts properties to them along with cash proceeds of
approximately $40 million (representing our share), in return for full payment of the underlying mortgage debt and a release of claims
against each party.
With this global settlement, our relationship with Steward effectively ended.
Prospect
Prospect leases nine facilities pursuant to two master lease agreements. Both master leases had initial fixed terms of 15 years
(ending in August 2034) and contain two extension options of five years and one extension option of four years and nine months, plus
annual inflation-based escalators. In addition to these master leases, we hold a $155 million mortgage loan secured by a first mortgage
on four facilities in Pennsylvania and a $75 million term loan. The master leases, mortgage loan, and term loan are all cross-defaulted
and cross-collateralized. We account for these leases and revenue from the loans to Prospect on the cash basis of accounting.
As discussed in previous filings, Prospect has experienced operational and liquidity challenges over the past few years from,
among other things, the COVID-19 global pandemic, labor cost increases, and general higher inflation. To improve its liquidity
position, Prospect completed a recapitalization plan in 2023 (the "Prospect Transaction") that altered the nature of our investments
with them and allowed for a deferral of rent and interest for a period of time. See Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-
K for further details of the Prospect Transaction.
Although the recapitalization plan was executed, the inability to minimize losses in their East Coast markets including selling
the operations of their Pennsylvania, Rhode Island (a state in which we have no investment), and Connecticut facilities in a timely
manner resulted in Prospect filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 11, 2025 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas. Prospect’s bankruptcy filing constitutes a default under the terms of our master leases and loan agreements
and imposes a stay on our ability to exercise contractual rights with respect to these defaults. The bankruptcy filing bars us from

16
collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from Prospect unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. While we
have engaged in negotiations with Prospect and other stakeholders and have reached a tentative agreement with Prospect, the outcome
of any such negotiations and remedies is uncertain at this time and will be subject in all cases to the approval of the bankruptcy court.
In addition, there is a risk that parties may seek to bring claims against us in Prospect’s bankruptcy proceeding. There can be no
guarantee that we will recover any pre-bankruptcy debts from Prospect in full, or at all.
See Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the impact of this bankruptcy on our investments in Prospect in
2024.
No other tenant accounted for more than 5% of our total assets at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Tax Structure
U.S.
We have operated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”)
since 2004. Accordingly, we are generally not subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our REIT taxable income, provided that
we continue to qualify as a REIT and our distributions to our stockholders equal or exceed such taxable income. This treatment
substantially eliminates the “double taxation” that ordinarily results from investment in a "C" corporation.
The Code defines a REIT as a corporation that: (a) is managed by one or more directors; (b) would be taxable as a domestic
corporation if not for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code; (c) is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons; (d) does not have five
or fewer individuals owning more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock; and (e) meets certain asset, income, and distributions
tests.
We believe that we are organized and have operated in a manner that is in line with the Code’s definition of a REIT since 2004,
and we intend to operate in this manner for the foreseeable future. However, see our “Tax Risks” section in Item 1A of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for further information including the potential impact to us if we were to lose our REIT status.
Certain non-real estate activities (such as working capital loans or investments in unconsolidated operating entities) we
undertake are conducted by entities which we elected to be treated as a TRS. Our TRS entities are subject to both U.S. federal and
state income taxes. In the case of domestic investments in unconsolidated operating entities, these investments typically fall under a
structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 (“RIDEA”). Under the provisions of
RIDEA, a REIT may lease “qualified health care properties” on an arm’s length basis to a TRS that owns healthcare operations so
long as the property is operated by an entity that qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor.”
International
For our properties located outside the U.S., we are subject to the local taxes of the jurisdictions where our properties reside
and/or legal entities are domiciled; however, we do not expect to incur additional taxes, of a significant nature, in the U.S. from
foreign-based income as the majority of such income flows through our REIT.
Effective July 1, 2023, we moved a majority of our U.K. assets into a U.K. REIT regime. The REIT requirements in the U.K.
are generally similar to those in the U.S. We believe we have met all requirements as of December 31, 2024.
Environmental Matters
Under various U.S. federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations and similar international laws, a current or
previous owner, operator, or tenant of real estate may be required to remediate hazardous or toxic substance releases or threats of
releases. There may also be certain obligations and liabilities on property owners with respect to asbestos containing materials.
Investigation, remediation, and monitoring costs may be substantial. The confirmed presence of contamination or the failure to
properly remediate contamination on a property may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent that property or to borrow funds using
such property as collateral and may adversely impact our investment in that property. Generally, prior to completing an acquisition or
closing a mortgage loan, we obtain Phase I environmental assessments (or similar studies outside the U.S.) in order to attempt to
identify potential environmental concerns at the facilities. These assessments are carried out in accordance with an appropriate level of
due diligence and generally include a physical site inspection, a review of relevant environmental and health agency database records,
one or more interviews with appropriate site-related personnel, review of the property’s chain of title, and review of historic aerial
photographs and other information on past uses of the property. We may also conduct limited subsurface investigations and test for
substances of concern where the results of the Phase I environmental assessments or other information indicates possible

17
contamination or where our consultants recommend such procedures. Upon closing and for the remainder of the lease or loan term,
our transaction documents typically require our tenants to repair and remediate environmental issues at the applicable facility, and to
comply in full with all environmental laws and regulations.
Seismic Standards
California Seismic Standards
The Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983 (“Alquist Act”), establishes, under the jurisdiction of the
Department of Health Care Access and Information ("HCAI"), formerly the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
("OSHPD"), a program of seismic safety building standards for certain hospitals constructed on and after March 7, 1973. The law
requires the California Building Standards Commission to adopt earthquake performance categories, seismic evaluation procedures,
standards and timeframes for upgrading certain facilities, and seismic retrofit building standards. This legislation was adopted to avoid
the loss of life and the disruption of operations and the provision of emergency medical services that may result from structural
damage sustained to hospitals resulting from an earthquake. A violation of any provision of the act is a misdemeanor.
Under the Alquist Act and related rules and regulations, all general acute care hospital buildings in California are assigned a
structural performance category (“SPC”). SPC ratings range from 1 to 5 with SPC-1 assigned to buildings that may be at risk of
collapse during a strong earthquake and SPC-5 assigned to buildings reasonably capable of providing services to the public following
a strong earthquake. Pursuant to the Alquist Act, state law initially required all SPC-1 buildings to be removed from providing general
acute care services by 2020 and all SPC-2 buildings to be removed from providing general acute care services by 2030. However, in
2017, HCAI adopted a new performance category that allowed hospitals to explore the possibilities of upgrading nonconforming
buildings to a new performance level that is not as rigorous. Under SPC-4D, buildings undergoing a retrofit to this level can continue
functioning indefinitely beyond 2030. In addition, California AB 2190 bill required HCAI to grant an additional extension of time to
an owner who was subject to the January 1, 2020, deadline if specified conditions were met. The bill authorized the additional
extension to be until July 1, 2022, if the compliance plan was based upon replacement or retrofit, or until January 1, 2025, if the
compliance plan was for a rebuild.
As of December 31, 2024, we have 17 licensed hospitals in California totaling investments of approximately $0.9 billion.
Exclusive of one hospital (representing less than 0.8% of our total assets), all of our California hospitals are seismically compliant
through 2030 as determined by HCAI. For the one remaining hospital, we have requested an extension to complete the project that
will result in the property being compliant. We expect this project to be completed by the second quarter of 2026.
Colombia Seismic Standards
Similar to California, the design, construction, and technical supervision of buildings in Colombia must meet certain minimum
seismic standards. Such standards divide the country into seismic hazard zones: low threat, intermediate threat, and high threat. Two
of our facilities are located in Bogotá, an intermediate threat zone, while the other two facilities (representing approximately 1% of our
total assets) are located in a high threat zone.
In addition, all buildings are classified into use groups. Clinical hospitals and health centers fall into Group IV, which are
deemed indispensable buildings and are held to a higher standard of earthquake resistant construction. Buildings in Group IV are
considered essential for the recovery of the community after the occurrence of an emergency, including an earthquake, and the
additional structural requirements are in place to ensure that they can remain operational.
As of December 31, 2024, our two facilities in the high threat zone are seismic compliant. We estimate that our two facilities in
Bogota, an intermediate threat zone, need approximately $15 million of seismic upgrades to become compliant under Colombian law.
Under our current lease and loan agreements, our tenants (or borrowers) are responsible for capital expenditures in connection
with seismic laws. We do not currently expect California or Colombia seismic standards to have a negative impact on our financial
condition or cash flows. We also do not currently expect compliance with seismic standards to materially impact the financial
condition of our tenants.

18
Competition
We compete in acquiring and developing facilities with financial institutions, other lenders, real estate developers, healthcare
operators, other REITs, other public and private real estate companies, infrastructure and other funds, and private real estate investors.
Among the factors that may adversely affect our ability to compete are the following:
•
we may have less knowledge than our competitors of certain markets in which we seek to invest in or develop facilities;
•
some of our competitors may have greater financial and operational resources than we have;
•
some of our competitors may have lower costs of capital than we do;
•
some of our competitors may pursue a transaction more quickly than we do;
•
our competitors or other entities may pursue a strategy similar to ours; and
•
some of our competitors may have existing relationships with our potential tenants/operators.
To the extent that we experience vacancies in our facilities, we will also face competition in leasing those facilities to
prospective tenants. The actual competition for tenants varies depending on the characteristics of each local market. Virtually all of
our facilities operate in highly competitive environments, and patients and referral sources, including physicians, may change their
preferences for healthcare facilities from time-to-time. The operators of our properties compete on a local and regional basis with
operators of properties that provide comparable services. Operators compete for patients based on a number of factors, including
quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of a facility, location, services offered, physicians, staff, and price. We also face
competition for tenants, such as physicians and other healthcare providers, from owners of comparable healthcare facilities.
For additional information, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Insurance
We obtain various types of insurance to mitigate the impact of property, business interruption, liability, flood, earthquake, fire,
wind, and other environmental losses. We attempt to obtain the appropriate policy terms, conditions, limits, and deductibles
considering the relative risk of loss and cost of coverage. However, there are certain types of extraordinary losses that may be either
uninsurable or not economically insurable.
We maintain or require in our leases and mortgage loans that our tenants maintain applicable types of insurance on our facilities
and their operations. In addition, we have a comprehensive insurance program to further protect our interests. At December 31, 2024,
we believe that the policy specifications and insured limits of our tenant’s policies and our own policies are appropriate given the
relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage, and standard industry practice. However, no assurances can be given that we will not
incur losses that are uninsured or that exceed our insurance coverage.
Healthcare Regulatory Matters
The following discussion describes certain material federal healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our operations and
those of our tenants. This discussion does not address all applicable federal healthcare laws, and does not address state healthcare laws
and regulations, except as otherwise indicated. These state laws and regulations, like the federal healthcare laws and regulations, could
affect the operations of our tenants and, accordingly, our operations. In some instances, we own a minority interest in our tenants’
operations and, in addition to the effect on our tenant’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us, our ownership and investment
returns may also be negatively impacted by such laws and regulations. Moreover, the discussion relating to reimbursement for
healthcare services addresses matters that are subject to frequent review and revision by Congress and the agencies responsible for
administering federal payment programs. Consequently, predicting future reimbursement trends or changes, along with the potential
impact to us, is inherently difficult and imprecise. Finally, though we have not included a comprehensive discussion of applicable
foreign laws or regulations, our tenants in Europe and South America may be subject to similar laws and regulations governing the
ownership or operation of healthcare facilities including, without limitation, laws governing patient care and safety, reimbursement,
licensure, and data protection.
Ownership and operation of hospitals and other healthcare facilities are subject, directly and indirectly, to substantial U.S.
federal, state, and local government healthcare laws, rules, and regulations. Our tenants’ failure to comply with these laws and
regulations could adversely affect their ability to meet their obligations to us. Physician investment in our facilities or in real estate
joint ventures is also subject to such laws and regulations. We are not a healthcare provider or in a position to influence the referral of
patients or ordering of items and services reimbursable by the federal government. Nonetheless, to the extent that a healthcare

19
provider engages in transactions with our tenants, such as subleases or other financial arrangements, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the
Stark Law (both discussed in this section), and any state counterparts thereto, could be implicated.
As in the U.S. under HIPAA and similar state data protection laws, our tenants in foreign jurisdictions may be subject to strict
laws and regulations governing data protection (such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR")),
generally, and the protection of a patient’s personal health information, specifically. Tenants may also be subject to laws and
regulations addressing billing and reimbursement for healthcare items and services. Furthermore, in certain cases, as with certificate of
need laws in the U.S., government approval in foreign jurisdictions may also be required prior to the transfer of a healthcare facility or
prior to the establishment of new or replacement facilities, the addition of beds, the addition or expansion of services, and certain
capital expenditures.
Our leases and loan documents typically require our tenants, both domestic and foreign, to comply with all applicable laws,
including healthcare laws. We intend for all of our business activities and operations (including that of our tenants/borrowers) in such
jurisdictions to conform in all material respects with all applicable healthcare laws, rules, and regulations.
Applicable Laws (not intended to be a complete list)
Anti-Kickback Statute. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)) prohibits, among other things,
the offer, payment, solicitation, or acceptance of remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for referring an individual to a provider
of items or services for which payment may be made in whole, or in part, under a federal healthcare program, including the Medicare
or Medicaid programs. Violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a crime, punishable by fines of up to $100,000 per violation, ten
years imprisonment, or both. Violations may also result in civil sanctions, including civil monetary penalties of up to $50,000 per
violation, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and additional monetary
penalties in amounts treble to the underlying remuneration. The Anti-Kickback Statute is an intent-based statute, and has been broadly
interpreted. As an example, courts have held that there is a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute if just one purpose of an
arrangement is to generate prohibited referrals even though there may be one or more other lawful purposes to the arrangement at
issue.
The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services has issued “Safe Harbor Regulations” that
describe practices that will not be considered violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute. Nonetheless, the fact that a particular
arrangement does not meet safe harbor requirements does not also mean that the arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Rather, the safe harbor regulations simply provide a guaranty that qualifying arrangements will not be prosecuted under the Anti-
Kickback Statute. We intend to use commercially reasonable efforts to structure our arrangements with tenants to satisfy, or meet as
closely as possible, all safe harbor conditions. We also require our tenants, under our lease or loan agreements, to comply with
applicable laws which would include structuring their arrangements with third parties in a manner that complies with the Anti-
Kickback Statute. We cannot assure you, however, that we or our tenants will meet all the conditions for an applicable safe harbor.
Physician Self-Referral Statute (“Stark Law”). Unless subject to an exception, the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act of 1989, or the
Stark Law (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn) prohibits a physician from making a referral to an “entity” furnishing “designated health
services” (which would include, without limitation, certain inpatient and outpatient hospital services) paid by Medicare or Medicaid if
the physician or a member of the physician's immediate family has a “financial relationship” with that entity. The prohibition further
bars the entity from billing Medicare or Medicaid for any services furnished pursuant to a prohibited referral. Sanctions for violating
the Stark Law include denial of payment, required refunding of amounts received for services provided pursuant to prohibited
referrals, imposition of civil monetary penalties of up to $15,000 per prohibited service provided, and exclusion from the participation
in federal healthcare programs. The statute also provides for a penalty of up to $100,000 for a circumvention scheme. The Stark Law
is a strict liability Statute, and therefore, no intent is required to be shown in order to prove a violation of the Statute.
There are exceptions to the self-referral prohibition for many of the customary financial arrangements between physicians and
providers, including, without limitation, employment contracts, rental of office space or equipment, personal services agreements and
recruitment agreements. Unlike safe harbors under the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law imposes strict liability on the parties to
an arrangement, and an arrangement must comply with every requirement of a Stark Law exception or the arrangement is in violation
of the Stark Law.
CMS has issued multiple phases of final regulations implementing the Stark Law and continues to make changes to these
regulations. Although our lease and loan agreements require tenants and borrowers to comply with the Stark Law (and we intend for
them to comply with the Stark Law), we cannot offer assurance that the arrangements entered into by us, our facilities, or our tenants
and borrowers will be found to be in compliance with the Stark Law, as it ultimately may be implemented or interpreted. In addition,
changes to the Stark Law could require our tenants to restructure certain arrangements with physicians, which could impact the
business of our tenants.

20
False Claims Act. The federal False Claims Act prohibits the making or presenting of any false claim for payment to the federal
government. It is the civil equivalent to federal criminal provisions prohibiting the submission of false claims to federally funded
programs. Additionally, qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the federal False Claims Act allow private individuals to bring
actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has defrauded the federal government. Whistleblowers may
collect a portion of the federal government’s recovery — an incentive for private parties to bring such actions. A successful federal
False Claims Act case may result in a penalty of three times the actual damages, plus additional civil penalties payable to the
government, plus reimbursement of the fees of counsel for the whistleblower. Many states have enacted similar statutes preventing the
presentation of a false claim to a state government.
The Civil Monetary Penalties Law. The Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) is a comprehensive statute that covers an
array of fraudulent and abusive activities and is very similar to the False Claims Act. Among other things, the CMPL prohibits the
knowing presentation of a claim for certain healthcare services that is false or fraudulent, the presentation of false or misleading
information in connection with claims for payment, and other acts involving fraudulent conduct. Violation of the CMPL may result in
penalties ranging from $20,000 to in excess of $100,000 (penalties are periodically adjusted). Notably, such penalties apply to each
instance of prohibited conduct, including each item or service not provided as claimed and each provision of false information or each
false record. In addition, violators of the CMPL may be penalized up to three times the amount unlawfully claimed and may be
excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs.
Licensure. Our tenants are subject to extensive federal, state, and local licensure, certification, and inspection laws and
regulations, including, in some cases, certificate of need laws. Further, various licenses and permits are required to dispense narcotics,
operate pharmacies, handle radioactive materials, and operate equipment. Failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss
of licensure, certification or accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, and suspension or decertification from federal
and state healthcare programs.
Data Privacy and Security. There are numerous laws and regulations at the U.S. federal and state levels, and globally,
addressing data privacy and cybersecurity. As one example, HIPAA restricts the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health
information (“PHI”), among other things, provides for safeguards of PHI, and requires healthcare providers to notify patients of
breaches of unsecured PHI. In general, our tenants based in the United States are subject to HIPAA, and they may also be subject to
similar state laws addressing the privacy and security of protected health information. Additionally, our tenants in jurisdictions outside
the United States may be subject to GDPR and to other various laws and regulations addressing the privacy and security of protected
health information. Moreover, at the U.S. federal and state levels, and globally, legislative and regulatory bodies continue to consider
various comprehensive data privacy and cybersecurity legislation to which our tenants may be subject. In general, we rely on our
tenants to comply with their obligations with respect to HIPAA and other similar privacy and security laws and regulations, and our
leases and loan agreements require that our tenants conduct their business in substantial compliance with applicable privacy and
security laws.
EMTALA. Our tenants that provide emergency care in the U.S. are subject to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active
Labor Act (“EMTALA”). Regardless of an individual’s ability to pay, this federal law requires such healthcare facilities to conduct an
appropriate medical screening examination of every individual who presents to the hospital’s emergency room for treatment and, if the
individual is suffering from an emergency medical condition, to either stabilize the condition or make an appropriate transfer of the
individual to a facility able to handle the condition. Liability for violations of EMTALA are severe and include, among other things,
civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Our lease and loan agreements require our
tenants to comply with EMTALA, and we believe our tenants conduct business in substantial compliance with EMTALA.
Antitrust Laws. The federal government and most states have enacted antitrust laws that prohibit certain types of conduct
deemed to be anti-competitive, which include, among other things, price fixing, market allocation, market monopolization, price
discrimination, or acquisitions of competitors. Antitrust enforcement in the healthcare industry is currently a priority of the Federal
Trade Commission and the DOJ, including with respect to hospitals, managed care plans, and physician practice acquisitions. As a
REIT, our transactions involving solely the purchase and sale of real estate are generally exempt from these antitrust laws.
Nonetheless, our tenants who operate hospitals, managed care plans, and physician practices may be subject to these laws governing
anti-competitive behavior, and we cannot predict how the enforcement of these antitrust laws may affect the operations, the growth, or
divestiture plans of our tenants.
Reimbursement Pressures. Healthcare facility operating margins have faced significant pressure due to the deterioration in
pricing flexibility and payor mix, a continued shift toward alternative payment models, increases in operating expenses (particularly
labor costs), reductions in levels of Medicaid funding due to state budget shortfalls, and other similar cost pressures on our tenants.
Private payors may also rely, to a certain extent, on government reimbursement programs to set reimbursement rates which could
further negatively impact the results and operations of our tenants.

21
Healthcare Reform. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”) has expanded health insurance coverage through tax subsidies and federal health
insurance programs, individual and employer mandates for health insurance coverage, and health insurance exchanges. A number of
reforms stem from the ACA, and federal agencies, including CMS, continue to propose and implement policies founded in the ACA.
These include various cost containment initiatives, quality improvement efforts, pay-for-performance criteria, and value-based
purchasing programs, among others. Health information technology standards for healthcare providers also continue to be
implemented as a means of improving quality and reducing costs. We cannot predict the impact of how any new initiatives, if adopted,
will affect our business, as some aspects may benefit the operations of our tenants, while other aspects may present challenges.
Corporate Responsibility
Corporate responsibility is an important part of our overall corporate activities, and we intend to further our sustainability
efforts. Our approach to sustainability is overseen by our Board of Directors (“Board”), executive management team, and our
Environmental and Social Committee, a committee of the Board that was formed to continuously improve programs, policies, and
practices relating to environmental, social, and governance initiatives across all aspects of our business. In addition, our Ethics,
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board is responsible for developing and recommending corporate governance
guidelines and policies. We also have an employee-led working group with responsibility for driving further environmental
performance improvements across all aspects of our business.
In 2024, we published our Corporate Responsibility Report, which describes how our approach to corporate responsibility issues
enables us to support our employees, to build strong tenant relationships, and positions us for sustainable success. Our environmental
sustainability initiatives focus on environmental improvements to our corporate operations and hospital facilities. As such, in 2024, we
measured and reported greenhouse gas emissions from our controlled and part of our noncontrolled operations and increased the
number of green provisions in our lease agreements.
To more effectively track and communicate our performance, we have adopted various frameworks and methodologies,
including participation in GRESB's Real Estate Assessment, and reporting disclosures better aligned with the Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board and the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosure.
Our corporate responsibility achievements over the past year include the following:
•
honored among Modern Healthcare Best Places to Work for the fourth consecutive year;
•
named to Newsweek's America's Most Responsible Companies list for the second consecutive year; and
•
achieved Green Lease Leaders Gold Certification by the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT) and the DOE Better
Building Alliance.
For additional information regarding our initiatives and to view our Corporate Responsibility Report, please visit our website at
www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.
Human Capital
Our employees are our most valuable asset. Led by our founding executives, we have a total of 118 employees as of February
28, 2025, located in the U.S., Luxembourg, and the U.K. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
We believe that our relations with our employees are good, and we are committed to providing a dynamic and supportive
workplace for our employees that encourages both personal and professional growth through significant training and continuing
education opportunities. We offer employees the opportunity to attend continuing education courses in order to maintain their
professional certifications, participate in seminars and workshops on topics related to their job responsibilities, and build upon their
leadership abilities through management development programs. In addition, we provide regular training for all employees on topics
such as personal safety, cybersecurity, and data security awareness, and we have established company-wide human rights, and health
and safety policies.
We offer a competitive benefits package that includes annual discretionary performance-based bonuses and stock compensation,
a 401(k) plan, leading healthcare and insurance benefits, paid time off, and health and wellness reimbursement programs, designed to
help recruit and retain high-quality, motivated employees, and to contribute to their health and security. We routinely evaluate and
benchmark the competitiveness of our compensation and benefit programs to ensure that we are rewarding our employees and
supporting their needs.
In 2024, a third party firm conducted an employee satisfaction survey to measure the level of satisfaction of each employee and
gain insight into the health of our company. The responses and comments we received were overwhelmingly positive. As a result,

22
MPT earned an 88% overall engagement score, high levels for employee satisfaction and confidence in executive management, and
was selected as one of Modern Healthcare’s Best Places to Work in healthcare for 2024.
We believe it is important to be a good corporate citizen around the world, particularly in the communities where our employees
live and work. We do this by providing financial support for private and public non-profit programs aimed at improving community
public health and supporting the diverse interests of our employees. In addition, we encourage each of our employees to get involved
in their communities to make a positive difference, and we provide time off to do so.
We are firmly committed to providing equal opportunity in all aspects of employment. We forbid discrimination against any
person or harassment, intimidation, or hostility of any kind, retaliation or any other characteristic or conduct that may be protected by
applicable local, state, or federal law. Our hiring process includes a robust search for the best available candidate and each candidate is
properly vetted through interviews with numerous MPT employees. The company also retains the services of an experienced
independent industrial psychologist to ensure a strong fit exists between the company and the candidate and that the candidate meets
the standards for the specific job and the needs of the company. We provide regular training on anti-harassment policies.
Our commitment to a diverse and inclusive workplace is demonstrated by the following:
Available Information
Our website address is www.medicalpropertiestrust.com and provides access in the “Investor Relations” section, free of charge,
to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, including exhibits, and all
amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We use, and intend to continue to use, the “Investor Relations” section of our website
as a means of disclosing material nonpublic information and of complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD,
including, without limitation, through the posting of investor presentations that may include material nonpublic information.
Accordingly, investors should monitor the “Investor Relations” section, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public
conference calls, presentations, and webcasts. Also available on our website, free of charge, are our Corporate Governance Guidelines,
the charters of our Ethics, Nominating, and Corporate Governance, Audit and Compensation Committees and our Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct. If you are not able to access our website, the information is available in print free of charge to any stockholder who
should request the information directly from us at (205) 969-3755. Information on or connected to our website is neither part of nor
incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other SEC filings.
39%
female
employees
13%
ethnically
diverse
under 30
15%
over 50
25%
44%
female or
ethnically
diverse

23
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The risks and uncertainties described herein are not the only ones facing us. There may be additional risk factors that we do not
presently know of or that we currently consider not likely to have a significant impact on us, and it is not possible for us to assess the
impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may affect our business.
Investors should also refer to our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for future periods and current reports on Form 8-K for material
updates to these risk factors. All of these risk factors could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition,
and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders. Some statements in this report, including statements in
the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. See “A Warning About Forward Looking Statements” at the
beginning of this Annual Report.
Risk factors pertaining to our Company generally fall within the following broad areas:
•
risks related to our business, tenants, and strategy;
•
financing risks;
•
risks relating to real estate investments;
•
risks relating to the healthcare industry;
•
risks relating to our organization and structure; and
•
tax risks.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS, TENANTS, AND STRATEGY
Adverse U.S. and global market, economic and political conditions, health crises and other events beyond our control could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Economic or financial crises, significant concerns over energy costs and inflation, elevated interest rates, geopolitical issues
(including as a result of the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, recent escalation in the conflict between the State of Israel
and Hamas, and other potential conflicts amongst countries in the Middle East and North Africa), the availability and cost of credit, or
a declining real estate market in the U.S. or abroad have in the past, and may in the future, contribute to increased volatility,
diminished expectations for the economy and the markets, shortage of available healthcare workers and related increased labor costs,
and high levels of unemployment by historical standards. As was the case from 2008 through 2010, as well as most of 2022 and 2023,
these factors, combined with volatile oil prices and fluctuating business and consumer confidence, can precipitate an economic
decline.
Adverse U.S. and global market, economic and political conditions, including dislocations and volatility in the credit markets,
elevated levels of inflation and interest rates, and general global economic uncertainty, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition as a result of the following potential consequences, among others:
•
reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices, or at all, or to obtain debt
financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans; and
•
our ability to obtain financing on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce
our ability to pursue acquisition and redevelopment opportunities, refinance existing debt, reduce our returns from our
acquisition and redevelopment activities, reduce our ability to sell properties or re-tenant properties at favorable terms, and
increase our future interest expense.
Public health crises, pandemics and epidemics, such as those caused by viruses such as H5N1 (avian flu), severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) and COVID-19, could adversely impact our and our tenants’ business by disrupting supply chains and
transactional activities, creating labor shortages, and negatively impacting local, national, or global economies.
Our revenues are dependent upon our relationships with and success of our tenants, particularly our largest tenants, like Circle,
Priory, HSA, Lifepoint Behavioral, and Swiss Medical.
Our tenants’ financial performance and resulting ability to satisfy their lease and loan obligations to us are material to our
financial results and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders. We have no operational control over the
business of our tenants and associated health systems. Our tenants experience operational challenges from time-to-time, and this can
be even more of a risk for those tenants that grow (or have grown) via acquisitions in a short time frame, like Circle, and others. Such

24
operational challenges can result in our tenants and operators having to write-off uncollectible accounts receivable, incurring higher
expenses, or even undergoing insolvency in certain cases.
For example, we recorded approximately $1.6 billion of real estate and other impairment charges related to Steward in 2024 due
to operational and liquidity challenges. For more information, including reserves and impairment charges, see Note 3 to Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are dependent upon the ability of our tenants to make rent and loan payments to us, and any failure
to meet these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31,
2024, our largest tenants – Circle, Priory, HSA, Lifepoint Behavioral, and Swiss Medical – represented 14.2%, 8.6%, 8.3%, 5.7%, and
5.1%, respectively, of our total assets.
We rely on our tenants to provide us with accurate financial and other information under the terms of our leases or in the
ordinary course of business relationship, which we, in turn, use for making business decisions, assessing risk and calculating and
reporting tenant coverage and other data. Because most of our tenants are private companies, the financial information they provide us
with might not be audited. If the financial or other information provided to us by our tenants is not accurate, our reported tenant
coverage and other data, which is based on such tenant-provided information might prevent us from making a timely or accurate
business decision or adequately assessing risk in connection with a tenant, which could adversely impact our financial condition,
results of operations, stock price, and reputation.
In addition, our tenants operate in the healthcare industry, which is highly regulated by U.S. federal, state, and local laws along
with laws in Europe and South America and changes in regulations may temporarily impact our tenants’ operations until they are able
to make the appropriate adjustments to their business. Any adverse result to our tenants (particularly Circle, Priory, HSA, Lifepoint
Behavioral, and Swiss Medical) in regulatory proceedings or financial or operational setbacks may have a material adverse effect on
the relevant tenant’s operations and on its ability to make required lease and loan payments to us.
We have made investments in certain operators of our healthcare facilities and the cash flows (and related returns) from these
investments are subject to more volatility than our properties with the traditional net leasing structure.
At December 31, 2024, we have approximately $0.4 billion of investments in unconsolidated operating entities, or 3% of our
total assets. These investments include loans but also equity investments that generate returns dependent upon the operator’s
performance. As a result, the cash flow and returns from these investments may be more volatile than that of our traditional triple-net
leasing structure.
As disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report, operational challenges for certain operators have in the past, and may in the
future, impact our ability to recover our investments, in part or at all, and therefore could have a material adverse impact on our
financial condition, results of operations, stock price, and ability to make distributions to our stockholders. See the risk factor titled
“Our revenues are dependent upon our relationships with and success of our tenants, particularly our largest tenants, like Circle,
Priory, HSA, Lifepoint Behavioral, and Swiss Medical” and Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants or investees could harm our operating results and financial condition.
Any bankruptcy filing by one of our tenants (such as Steward in 2024 and Prospect in 2025) could harm our operating results
and financial condition. A bankruptcy filing could bar us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or their property,
unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. A tenant bankruptcy can be expected to delay our efforts
to collect past due balances under our leases and loans, and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. If a lease is assumed
by a tenant in bankruptcy (as in the case of Pipeline Health System, LLC ("Pipeline") in 2022), we expect that all pre-bankruptcy
balances due under the lease would be paid to us in full. However, if we are required to seek one or more replacement operators for
our facilities, this may result in delays and increase costs as transferring operations of healthcare facilities is highly regulated. If a
lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we could have only a secured claim for damages. Any secured claims we have against our
tenants may only be paid to the extent of the value of the collateral, which may not cover any or all of our losses. Any unsecured claim
(such as our equity interests in our tenants) we hold against a bankrupt entity may be paid only to the extent that funds are available
and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. We may recover none or substantially less than the
full value of any unsecured claims, which would harm our financial condition. In addition, any bankruptcy filing by one of our tenants
may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention and result in increased professional fees that may not be
recovered.
In regard to the Steward bankruptcy, a global settlement was reached by all parties in September 2024, and we have begun the
process of re-tenanting many of the properties. However, certain of the operators who have taken control over the former Steward-
operated facilities are receiving transitional services from Steward. If Steward is unable to continue providing these services, these
operators would be required to find alternative arrangements. These operators may be unable to find alternative arrangements on
similar terms or within their anticipated timelines, which could impact their ability to pay rents due to us or service any loans that have
been extended by us.

25
Declines in the fair value of our assets may force us to recognize impairment charges, which could adversely impact our
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We periodically evaluate our investments for impairment under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the U.S.
based on factors such as market conditions, tenant performance and investment structure. If we determine that an impairment has
occurred, we are required to make a downward adjustment to the net carrying value of the property. For example, the early termination
of, or default under, a lease by a tenant or operator may lead to an impairment charge with respect to the relevant asset. During the
year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred approximately $2 billion of aggregate impairment charges relating to our investments in
Steward and Prospect. For more information, including reserves and impairment charges, see Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Impairment charges also indicate a potential permanent adverse change in the fundamental operating characteristics of the
impaired asset. There is no assurance that adverse impairment charges will be reversed in the future and the decline in the impaired
asset’s value could be permanent. There can be no assurance that we will not take additional charges in the future. Any future
impairment could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and the market price of our
common stock.
It may be costly to replace defaulting tenants and we may not find suitable replacements on suitable terms.
Failure on the part of a tenant to comply materially with the terms of a lease could give us the right to terminate the lease,
repossess the facility, cross default certain other leases and loans with that tenant, and enforce the payment obligations under the lease.
The process of terminating a lease with a defaulting tenant and repossessing the applicable facility may be costly and require a
disproportionate amount of management’s attention. In addition, defaulting tenants may initiate litigation in connection with a lease
termination or repossession against us. If a tenant-operator defaults and we choose to terminate the lease, we would then be required to
find another tenant-operator or to sell the facility. The transfer of healthcare facilities is highly regulated, which may result in delays
and increased costs in locating a suitable replacement tenant. The lease of these properties to non-healthcare operators may be difficult
due to the added cost and time of refitting the properties. If we are unable to re-let the properties, we may be forced to sell the
properties at a loss. There can be no assurance that we would be able to find another tenant in a timely fashion, or at all, or that, if
another tenant were found, we would be able to enter into a new lease on favorable terms. Defaults by our tenants under our leases
may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our
stockholders. Defaults by our significant tenants under master leases (like Circle, Priory, HSA, Lifepoint Behavioral, and Swiss
Medical) would have an even more pronounced negative impact.
It may be costly to find new tenants when lease terms end, and we may not be able to replace such tenants with suitable
replacements on suitable terms.
Failure on the part of a tenant to renew or extend the lease at the end of its fixed term could result in us having to search for,
negotiate with, and execute new lease agreements. The process of finding and negotiating with a new tenant, along with costs (such as
maintenance, property taxes, utilities, ground lease expenses, etc.) that we will incur while the facility is untenanted, may be costly
and require a disproportionate amount of our management’s attention. There can be no assurance that we would be able to find another
tenant in a timely fashion, or at all, or that, if another tenant were found, we would be able to enter into a new lease on favorable
terms. If we are unable to re-let the properties to healthcare operators, we may be forced to sell the properties at a loss due to the
repositioning expenses likely to be incurred by non-healthcare purchasers. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial
amounts to adapt the facility to other uses. Thus, the non-renewal or extension of leases may adversely affect our results of operations,
financial condition, and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders. This risk is even greater for those
properties under master leases (like Circle and Prospect) because several properties have the same lease ending dates. See Item 2 for
our lease and loan maturity schedule.
We have experienced rapid growth over the years, from adding new tenants to expanding our global footprint, and our failure
to effectively manage our growth may adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows, which could negatively affect
our ability to service our debt and make distributions.
In past years, we have experienced growth through investments in healthcare properties and expansion into nine countries and
three continents. We continually evaluate property acquisition and development opportunities as they arise. There is no assurance that
we will be able to adapt our management, administrative, accounting, and operational systems, or hire and retain sufficient operational
staff, to manage any facilities that we may acquire or develop in the future. Additionally, investing in real estate located in foreign
countries creates risks associated with the uncertainty of foreign laws, economies, and markets, and exposes us to local economic
downturns and adverse market developments. Our failure to manage our growth effectively may adversely impact our financial
condition and cash flows, which could negatively affect our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders. Our

26
growth could also increase our capital requirements, which may require us to issue potentially dilutive equity securities and/or incur
additional debt.
We have less experience with healthcare facilities located outside the U.S.
At December 31, 2024, we had approximately 47.8% of our total assets located in eight different countries outside the U.S. We
have less experience investing in healthcare properties or other real estate-related assets located outside the U.S. Investing in real
estate located in foreign countries creates risks associated with the uncertainty of foreign laws and markets including, without
limitation, laws respecting foreign ownership, the enforceability of loan and lease documents, and foreclosure laws. Foreign real estate
and tax laws are complex and subject to change, and we cannot assure you we will always be in compliance with those laws or that
compliance will not expose us to additional expense. The properties we have acquired internationally will face risks in connection
with unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, political and economic instability, potential imposition of adverse or confiscatory
taxes, possible challenges to the anticipated tax treatment of the structures that allow us to acquire and hold investments, possible
currency transfer restrictions, the difficulty in enforcing obligations in other countries, the impact from Brexit and future
developments in the European Union, and the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. In addition, to qualify as a
REIT, we generally will be required to operate any non-U.S. investments in accordance with the rules applicable to U.S. REITs, which
may be inconsistent with local practices. We may also be subject to fluctuations in local real estate values or markets or the economy
as a whole, which may adversely affect our investments.
In addition, the revenues and expenses incurred internationally are denominated in either euros, British pounds, Swiss francs, or
Colombian pesos, which could expose us to losses resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates to the extent we have not hedged our
position, which in turn could adversely affect our revenues, operating margins, and dividends, and may also affect the book value of
our assets and the amount of stockholders’ equity. While we may hedge some of our foreign currency risk, we may not be able to do
so successfully and may incur losses on our investments as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. Furthermore, we are subject to laws
and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar local anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and
their employees, agents, and contractors from making improper payments to governmental officials for the purpose of obtaining or
retaining business. Failure to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could materially and
adversely affect our results of operations, the value of our international investments, and our ability to service our debt and make
distributions to our stockholders.
We and our tenants have exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could impact profitability.
We receive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term net leases that generally provide for fixed
rental rates subject to annual escalations. These annual escalations may be contingent on changes in CPI (or a similar index
internationally), typically with specified caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the CPI does not
increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered by these leases. In addition, if strong economic conditions or higher than
normal inflation results in significant increases in CPI (as was the case in 2023), but the escalations under our leases are capped, our
growth and profitability may be limited.
Conversely, higher than normal increases in CPI could negatively impact our tenants' profitability, particularly if reimbursement
revenues from governmental programs, like Medicare, do not keep pace. Even if these governmental programs eventually increase
reimbursement rates in line with CPI, there could be interim shortfalls for our tenants, which may adversely impact our ability to
collect rent/interest on a timely basis.
Our business is highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete successfully.
We compete for acquisition and development opportunities with, among others, private investors, including large private equity
funds; healthcare providers, including physicians; other REITs; real estate developers; government-sponsored and/or not-for-profit
agencies; financial institutions; and other lenders. Some of these competitors may have substantially greater financial resources than
we have and may have better relationships with lenders and sellers. Competition for healthcare facilities may adversely affect our
ability to acquire or develop healthcare facilities and the prices we pay for those facilities. If we are unable to acquire or develop
facilities or if we pay too much for facilities, our revenue, earnings growth, and financial return could be materially adversely affected.
Certain of our facilities, or facilities we may acquire or develop in the future, will face competition from other nearby facilities that
provide services comparable to those offered at our facilities. Some of those facilities are owned by governmental agencies and
supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by tax-exempt corporations and may be supported to a large extent by endowments
and charitable contributions. Those types of support are not generally available to our facilities. In addition, competing healthcare
facilities located in the areas served by our facilities may provide healthcare services that are not available at our facilities. From time-
to-time, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change the healthcare facilities to which they

27
refer patients. Each of these circumstances could adversely affect our tenants and indirectly our results of operations, financial
condition, and ability to service our debt and make distributions.
Many of our tenants have an option to purchase the facilities we lease to them, which could disrupt our operations.
Many of our tenants have the option to purchase the facilities we lease to them. There is no assurance that the formulas we have
developed for setting the purchase price will yield a fair market value purchase price. In the event our tenants decide to purchase the
facilities at the end of the lease term, we may not be able to re-invest the capital on as favorable terms, or at all. Our inability to
effectively manage the turnover of our facilities could materially adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and our
results of operations.
We have 100 leased properties that are subject to purchase options as of December 31, 2024. For 85 of these properties, the
purchase option generally allows the lessee to purchase the real estate at the end of the lease term, assuming not currently in default, at
a price equivalent to the greater of (i) fair market value or (ii) our original purchase price (increased, in some cases, by a certain annual
rate of return from the lease commencement date). The lease agreements generally provide for an appraisal process to determine fair
market value. For eight of these properties, the purchase option generally allows the lessee to purchase the real estate at the end of the
lease term, assuming not currently in default, at our purchase price (increased, in some cases, by a certain annual rate of return from
lease commencement date). For the remaining seven properties, the purchase options approximate fair value.
In certain circumstances, a prospective purchaser of our hospital real estate may be deemed to be subject to Anti-Kickback and
Stark statutes, which are described in the “Healthcare Regulatory Matters” section in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In
such event, it may not be practicable for us to sell a property to such prospective purchaser at a price other than fair market value.
Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the healthcare industry may result in a change of control of, or a
competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants or operators, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
The healthcare industry continues to experience consolidation, including among owners of real estate and healthcare providers.
We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance
companies, private equity firms, and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our
tenants. We have historically developed strong, long-term relationships with many of our tenants. A competitor’s investment in one of
our tenants, any change of control of a tenant, or a change in the tenant’s management team could enable our competitor to influence
or control that tenant’s business and strategy. This influence could have a material adverse effect on us by impairing our relationship
with the tenant, negatively affecting our interest, or impacting the tenant’s financial and operational performance, including their
ability to pay us rent or interest. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have
consent rights, termination rights, remedies upon default, or other rights and remedies related to a competitor’s investment in, a
change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including
termination rights or remedies upon default, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business, and other
relevant considerations.
Our investments in joint ventures could be adversely affected by our lack of control, our partners’ failure to meet their
obligations, and disputes with our partners.
We have investments in five unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with independent parties that total approximately $1.2
billion at December 31, 2024. Joint venture arrangements involve risks including the possibility that the other party may refuse or not
be able to make capital contributions if needed, that our partner might have economic or other interests that are inconsistent with the
joint venture’s interests, or that we may become engaged in a dispute with our partner. If any of these events occur, we may need to
provide additional funding to the joint ventures to meet its obligations, incur additional expenses to resolve disputes, or be forced to
buy out the partner’s interest or to sell our interests at a time that is not advantageous to us. Any loss of income, cash flow, or
disruption of management’s time could have a negative impact on the rest of our business.
Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, employees, and other stakeholders regarding our corporate
responsibility practices and reporting could cause us to incur additional costs, devote additional resources, and expose us to
additional risks, which could adversely impact our reputation, tenant and employee acquisition and retention, and access to
capital.
Companies across all industries are facing increased scrutiny related to their corporate responsibility practices and reporting.
Investors, employees, and other stakeholders have begun to focus on corporate responsibility practices and to place greater importance
on the implications and social cost of their investments and business decisions. For example, an increasing number of investment
funds focus on positive corporate responsibility practices and sustainability scores when making an investment decision. In addition,

28
investors, particularly institutional investors, use corporate responsibility practices and scores to benchmark companies against their
peers and if a company is perceived as lagging, such investors may engage with a company to improve disclosure or performance and
may also make voting decisions on this basis. Given this increased focus and demand, public reporting regarding corporate
responsibility practices is becoming more broadly expected. If our practices and reporting regarding, among others, corporate
governance, environmental compliance, human capital management, and workforce inclusion and diversity do not meet investor,
employee, and other stakeholder expectations, our reputation may be negatively impacted. We could also incur additional costs and
devote additional resources to monitoring, reporting, and implementing various corporate responsibility practices. Our failure, or
perceived failure, to meet the goals and objectives we set in our sustainability disclosure or the expectations of our various
stakeholders, could negatively impact our reputation, tenant and employee retention, and access to capital.
FINANCING RISKS
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and may otherwise adversely impact our business operations
and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
As of February 28, 2025, we had approximately $9.0 billion of debt outstanding - see "Contractual Commitments" in Item 7 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a schedule of our debt coming due over the next five years. Our indebtedness could have
significant effects on our business, including by:
•
requiring us to use a substantial portion (or all) of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, which would
reduce available cash flow to fund working capital, development projects, and other general corporate purposes, as well as
cash distributions;
•
forcing us to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms, to make payments on our debt;
•
reducing our ability to extend existing bank debt or refinance debt on favorable terms;
•
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
•
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting other business opportunities; and
•
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt.
Our future borrowings under our loan facilities may bear interest at variable rates in addition to the $0.3 billion in variable
interest rate debt that we had outstanding as of February 28, 2025. If interest rates increase significantly, our operating results would
decline along with the cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
In addition, most of our current debt is, and we anticipate that much of our future debt will be, non-amortizing and payable in
balloon payments. Therefore, we will likely need to refinance at least a portion of that debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may
not be able to refinance debt maturing in 2026 and future years or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the
terms of the then-existing debt. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended, or repaid with proceeds from
other sources, such as new equity capital, joint venture proceeds, or sales of facilities, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay all
maturing debt in years when significant balloon payments come due. See Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further
information on our debt maturities.
Covenants in our debt instruments limit our operational flexibility, and a breach of these covenants could materially affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
The terms of our credit facility ("Credit Facility") and the indentures governing our outstanding senior notes and other debt
instruments that we may enter into in the future are subject to customary financial, operational, and reporting covenants. For example,
our Credit Facility imposes certain restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to: incur debts; create or incur liens; provide
guarantees in respect of obligations of any other entity; make redemptions and repurchases of our capital stock; prepay, redeem, or
repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; enter into affiliated transactions; dispose of real estate; and change our business.
In addition, our Credit Facility and senior notes limit the amount of dividends we can pay. Furthermore, our senior notes require us to
maintain total unencumbered assets (as defined in the related indenture) of not less than 150% of our unsecured indebtedness, and the
terms of our senior secured notes issued in February 2025 limit the amount of first lien debt that can be secured on the collateral of
such notes. Finally, our Credit Facility requires compliance with certain borrowing base conditions, as well as maintenance of
maximum total leverage and unsecured leverage ratios and a minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio. From time-to-time, the
lenders of our Credit Facility may adjust certain covenants to give us more flexibility (as was done in April and August of 2024, and
most recently in February 2025); however, such modified covenants could be temporary, and we must be in a position to meet the

29
lowered reset covenants in the future. Our continued ability to incur debt and operate our business is subject to compliance with the
covenants in our debt instruments. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under applicable debt instruments and other
debt instruments due to cross-default provisions, even if payment obligations are satisfied. Financial and other covenants, among
others, that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from a breach of any of these covenants in our debt
instruments, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
As of February 28, 2025, we had approximately $0.3 billion in variable interest rate debt along with €655 million in our joint
venture arrangement with Primotop Holdings S.à.r.l. (“Primotop”). This variable rate debt subjects us to interest rate volatility. To
manage this interest rate volatility, we from time-to-time have entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate. However, these
hedging arrangements involve risk, including the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations, that these arrangements
may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, and that these arrangements may result in higher interest rates
than we would otherwise have (in the case of our interest rate swaps). Moreover, no hedging activity can completely insulate us from
the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely
affect our results of operations and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile and may decline regardless of our operating
performance, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
As observed in 2024 and 2023, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. In
addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. A variety of factors
may cause significant price variations, including, we believe, the amount and status of short interest in our securities and any
coordinated trading activities or large derivative positions in our common stock. For example, the potential for a "short squeeze"
whereby a number of investors take a short position in a stock and have to buy the borrowed securities to close out the position at a
time that other short sellers of the same security also want to close out their positions, may result in volatility in our stock price. If the
market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to sell your shares at or above your purchase price.
We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
Although not a comprehensive list, some possible factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the
price or trading volume of our common stock include:
•
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or distributions;
•
changes in our earnings estimates, or publications of research, news, or other reports about us or the real estate industry;
•
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
•
changes in the market value of our facilities;
•
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the future;
•
additions or departures of key management personnel;
•
actions by institutional stockholders;
•
an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, general acute care hospitals, behavioral health facilities, post acute care
facilities, or freestanding ER/urgent care facilities;
•
speculation in the press or investment community;
•
short-selling activity;
•
the financial performance and health of our tenants; and
•
general market and economic conditions, including inflation and rising interest rates.
Future sales of common stock may have adverse effects on our stock price.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of common stock on the market price of our common stock. Sales of
substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that these sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for
our common stock. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to sell your shares at or above

30
your purchase price. In addition, such a share price decline could impair our ability to raise future capital through a sale of additional
equity securities.
Downgrades in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital.
During 2024, our credit ratings were lowered by both S&P Global and Moody's Investors Service. As of February 28, 2025,
S&P Global rates Medical Properties Trust and our unsecured notes at CCC+. Our corporate family rating for Moody's was upgraded
in February 2025 to B3 and Moody's assigned a B2 rating to the new secured debt that was issued in February 2025 (see Note 14 to
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on this offering). However, S&P currently has a negative outlook on
our ratings, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or improve our current credit ratings. Any downgrades in
terms of ratings or outlook by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of
capital, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell our securities is our dividend rate as a
percentage of our price per share of common stock, relative to market interest rates. In recent years, elevated inflation has prompted
central banks to tighten monetary policies and raise interest rates, which can create headwinds to economic growth. Previous rate
hikes enacted by the Federal Reserve in 2022 and 2023 have had a significant impact on interest rate indexes, such as SOFR and the
Prime Rate. In 2024, amid cooling inflation, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates three times. However, if market interest rates
remain elevated or if they were to begin rising again, prospective investors may desire a higher distribution on our securities or seek
securities paying higher distributions. The market price of our common stock likely will be based primarily on the earnings that we
derive from rental and interest income with respect to our facilities and our related distributions to stockholders, and not from the
underlying appraised value of the facilities themselves. As a result, interest rate fluctuations and capital market conditions can affect
the market price of our common stock. In addition, rising interest rates would result in increased interest expense on our variable-rate
debt, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and make distributions.
As a result of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024, not being filed timely, we are currently
ineligible to file a new short-form registration statement on Form S-3 for sales of securities, including under an ATM program,
which may impair our ability to raise capital on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner or at all.
Form S-3 permits eligible issuers to conduct registered offerings using a short-form registration statement that is automatically
effective and allows the incorporation by reference of past and future filings and reports made under the Exchange Act. In addition,
Form S-3 enables eligible issuers to conduct primary offerings “off the shelf” by registering an indeterminate amount of specified
securities which, combined with automatic effectiveness and the ability to forward incorporate information, allows issuers to access
the capital markets in a more expeditious and efficient manner than raising capital in a standard registered offering pursuant to Form
S-11. As a result of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024, not being filed timely, we are currently
ineligible to file a new short-form registration statement on Form S-3 for sales of securities, including under an at-the-market
("ATM") program, until June 1, 2025, which may impair our ability to raise necessary capital to repay our debt obligations as they
become due, pursue acquisition and development opportunities, and execute our business strategy. If we seek to access the capital
markets through a registered offering during the period of time that we are unable to use a registration statement on Form S-3, we may
experience delays in the offering process due to SEC review of a registration statement on Form S-11, experience downward pressure
on our share price given that we will have to disclose the offering prior to formal commencement, and incur increased offering and
transaction costs. If we are unable to raise capital through a registered offering, we would be required to conduct financing
transactions on a private placement basis, subject to pricing, size and other limitations for equity raises under the NYSE rules, or seek
other sources of capital, which are not guaranteed. The foregoing limitations on our financing approaches could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial position.
Limited access to capital may restrict our growth.
Our business plan contemplates growth through acquisitions and development of facilities. As a REIT, we are required to make
distributions, which (if paid in cash) reduce our ability to fund acquisitions and developments with retained earnings. Thus, access to
the capital markets, bank borrowings and other financing vehicles is important to fund new opportunistic investments. Due to market
or other conditions, we may not be able to obtain additional equity or debt capital or dispose of assets on favorable terms, or at all, at
the time we need additional capital to acquire healthcare properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.

31
RISKS RELATING TO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
Our investments are and are expected to continue to be concentrated in a single industry segment, making us more vulnerable
economically than if our investments were more diversified.
We acquire, develop, and make investments in healthcare real estate. In addition, we selectively make investments in healthcare
operators. We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. The risks resulting from a lack of diversification
become even greater as a result of our business strategy to invest solely in healthcare facilities. A downturn in the real estate industry
could materially adversely affect the value of our facilities. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our tenants’
ability to make lease or loan payments to us as well as our return on our equity investments. Consequently, our ability to meet debt
service obligations or make distributions to our stockholders is dependent on the real estate and healthcare industries.
Our facilities may not have efficient alternative uses, which could impede our ability to find replacement tenants in the event of
termination or default under our leases.
Primarily all of the facilities in our current portfolio are net-leased healthcare facilities. If we, or our tenants, terminate the leases
for these facilities, or if these tenants lose their regulatory authority to operate these facilities, we may not be able to locate suitable
replacement tenants to lease the facilities for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to
adapt the facilities to other uses. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures occurring as a result could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could hinder our ability to meet debt service obligations or
make distributions to our stockholders.
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of
our facilities and harm our financial condition.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Additionally, the real estate market is affected by many factors beyond our
control, including adverse changes in global, national, and local economic and market conditions and the availability, costs, and terms
of financing. Our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our facilities in response to changes in economic and other conditions will
be limited. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any facility that we are required to sell for liquidity
reasons. Our inability to respond rapidly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Development and construction risks could adversely affect our ability to service debt and make distributions.
We have developed and constructed facilities in the past and are currently developing several facilities. Our development and
related construction activities may subject us to the following risks: we may have to compete for suitable development sites; our
ability to complete construction is dependent on there being no title, environmental, or other legal proceedings arising; we may be
subject to delays due to weather conditions, strikes, supply chain disruptions, available labor, and other contingencies beyond our
control; we may be unable to obtain, or suffer delays in obtaining necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required
governmental permits, which could result in increased costs, delays, or our abandonment of these projects; and we may incur
construction costs for a facility which exceed our original estimates due to increased costs for materials or labor or other costs that we
did not anticipate.
We expect to fund our development projects over time. The time frame required for development and construction of these
facilities means that we may have to wait for some time to earn significant cash returns. In addition, our tenants may not be able to
obtain managed care provider contracts in a timely manner or at all. Risks associated with our development projects may reduce
anticipated rental revenue, which could affect our ability to service our debt and make distributions.
We may be subject to risks arising from future acquisitions of real estate.
We may be subject to risks in connection with our acquisition of healthcare real estate, including:
•
we may have no previous business experience with the tenants at the facilities acquired, and we may face difficulties in
working with them;
•
underperformance of the acquired facilities due to various factors, including unfavorable terms and conditions of any
acquired lease agreements, disruptions caused by the management of our tenants, or changes in economic conditions;
•
diversion of our management’s attention away from other business concerns;

32
•
exposure to any undisclosed or unknown potential liabilities (including environmental liabilities) relating to the acquired
facilities (or entities acquired in a share deal); and
•
potential underinsured losses on the acquired facilities.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage the new properties without encountering difficulties or that any such
difficulties will not have a material adverse effect on us.
Our facilities may not achieve expected results, which may harm our financial condition and operating results and our ability to
service our debt and make the distributions to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT status.
Acquisitions and developments entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations and that
estimates of the costs of necessary improvements may prove inaccurate, as well as general investment risks associated with any new
real estate investment. Newly-developed or newly-renovated facilities may not have operating histories that are helpful in making
objective pricing decisions. The purchase prices of these facilities will be based in part upon projections by management as to the
expected operating results of the facilities, subjecting us to risks that these facilities may not achieve anticipated operating results or
may not achieve these results within anticipated time frames. If our facilities do not achieve expected results and generate ample cash
flows from operations, amounts available to service our debt or to make distributions to stockholders in order to maintain our status as
a REIT could be adversely affected.
We may suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of our insurance coverage limits.
Our leases and mortgage loans generally require our tenants/borrowers to carry property, general liability, professional liability,
loss of earnings, all risk, and extended coverage insurance in amounts sufficient to permit the replacement of the facility in the event
of a total loss, subject to applicable deductibles. We carry general liability insurance and loss of earnings coverage on all of our
properties as a contingent measure in case our tenant’s coverage is not sufficient. However, there are certain types of losses, generally
of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, and acts of terrorism, which may be uninsurable or not
insurable at a price we or our tenants/borrowers can afford. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental
considerations, and other factors also might make it impracticable to use insurance proceeds to replace a facility after it has been
damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds we receive might not be adequate to restore our economic
position with respect to the affected facility. If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce our return from the facility and the
value of our investment. We continually review the insurance maintained by our tenants/borrowers and believe the coverage provided
to be adequate and customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. However, we cannot provide any assurances that such
insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future. Also, we cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in
excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.
Capital expenditures for facility renovation may be greater than anticipated and may adversely impact rent payments by our
tenants and our ability to service debt and make distributions to stockholders.
Facilities, particularly those that consist of older structures, have an ongoing need for capital improvements, including periodic
replacement of fixtures and fixed equipment. Although our leases generally require our tenants to be primarily responsible for the cost
of such expenditures, renovation of facilities involves certain risks, including the possibility of environmental problems, regulatory
requirements, construction cost overruns and delays, uncertainties as to market demand or deterioration in market demand after
commencement of renovation, and the emergence of unanticipated competition from other facilities. All of these factors could
adversely impact rent and loan payments by our tenants and returns on our equity investments, which in turn could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and our ability to service debt and make distributions.
Certain of our healthcare facilities are subject to property taxes that may increase in the future and adversely affect our
business.
Our facilities are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as property tax rates change and as the facilities
are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Our leases generally provide that the property taxes are charged to our tenants as an
expense related to the facilities that they occupy. As the owner of the facilities, however, we are ultimately responsible for payment of
the taxes to the government. If property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately
requiring us to pay the taxes. If we incur these tax liabilities, our ability to service our debt and make expected distributions to our
stockholders could be adversely affected. In addition, if such taxes increase on properties in which we have an equity investment in
the tenant, our return on investment maybe negatively affected.

33
As the owner and lessor of real estate, we are subject to risks under environmental laws, the cost of compliance with which and
any violation of which could materially adversely affect us.
Various environmental laws may impose liability on the current or prior owner or operator of real property for removal or
remediation of hazardous or toxic substances. Current or prior owners or operators may also be liable for government fines and
damages for injuries to persons, natural resources, and adjacent property. These environmental laws often impose liability whether or
not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of the hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of
complying with environmental laws could materially adversely affect our ability to service our debt or make distributions to our
stockholders. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure of our tenants to properly manage, dispose of, or
remediate such substances, including medical waste generated by other healthcare operators, may adversely affect our tenants or our
ability to use, sell, or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, could reduce our revenue and
our financing ability. We typically obtain Phase I environmental assessments (or similar studies) on facilities we acquire or develop or
on which we make mortgage loans. However, even if the Phase I environmental assessment reports do not reveal any material
environmental contamination, it is possible that material environmental contamination and liabilities may exist, of which we are
unaware.
Although our leases and mortgage loans require our operators to comply with laws and regulations governing their operations,
including the disposal of medical waste, and to indemnify us for environmental liabilities, the scope of their obligations may be
limited. We cannot assure you that our tenants would be able to fulfill their indemnification obligations and, therefore, any material
violation of environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, environmental laws are constantly evolving,
and changes in laws or regulations, or changes in interpretations of the foregoing, could create liabilities where none exist today.
Our interests in facilities through ground leases expose us to the loss of the facility upon breach or termination of the ground
lease, may limit our use of the facility, and may result in additional expense to us if our tenants vacate our facility.
We have acquired interests in 21 facilities, at least in part, by acquiring leasehold interests in the land on which the facility is
located rather than an ownership interest in the land. As lessee under ground leases, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the
property upon termination, or an earlier breach by us, which could be a negative impact to our financial condition. Ground leases may
also restrict our use of facilities, which may limit our flexibility in renting the facility and may impede our ability to sell the property.
Finally, if our facility lease expires or is terminated for whatever reason resulting in the tenant vacating the facility, we would be
responsible for the ground lease payments until we found a replacement tenant, which would negatively impact our cash flows and
results of operations.
RISKS RELATING TO THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY
The continued pressure on healthcare reimbursement in the U.S. and other countries in which we do business, including shifts
from fee-for-service reimbursement towards alternative payment models, other healthcare policy reforms, and government cost
cutting measures, could adversely affect the profitability of our tenants and hinder their ability to make payments to us.
Sources of revenue for our tenants may include the U.S. Medicare and Medicaid programs, other government-sponsored
payment programs, private insurance carriers, and health maintenance organizations, among others. In addition to ongoing efforts to
reduce healthcare costs, the failure of any of our tenants to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their ability to
continue participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other government-sponsored payment programs.
The shift in our tenant payor mix away from fee-for-service payors results in an increase in the percentage of revenues
attributable to alternative payment models implemented by private and government payors, which can lead to reductions in
reimbursement for services provided by our tenants. In the U.S., there is continued focus on transitioning Medicare from its traditional
fee-for-service model to models that employ one or more capitated, value-based, or bundled payment approaches, and private payors
have implemented similar types of alternative payment models. Other countries where we do business have implemented various
strategies to reduce overall healthcare cost or may do so in the future. Such efforts from private and government payors, in addition to
general industry trends, continue to place pressures on our tenants to control healthcare costs. Furthermore, pressures to control
healthcare costs and a shift away from traditional health insurance reimbursement have resulted in an increase in the number of
patients whose healthcare coverage is provided under managed care plans, such as health maintenance organizations and preferred
provider organizations. These shifts place further cost pressures on our tenants. We also continue to believe that, due to the aging of
the population and the expansion of governmental payor programs, there will be a marked increase in the number of patients relying
on healthcare coverage provided by governmental payors. In instances where we have an equity investment in our tenants’ operations,
in addition to the effect on these tenants’ ability to meet their financial obligations to us, our ownership and investment interests may
also be negatively impacted.

34
Additionally, government and commercial payors in the United States, and in other countries (like Colombia) in which we do
business, have the ability to withhold or delay claims payments to our tenants. Delayed or withheld payments may be due to a variety
of reasons including, but not limited to, initial denials based on incomplete or inaccurate documentation, payors strategically slowing
payments, a lack of funds available, or a combination of these and other factors. Delayed or withheld payments to our tenants may
impact those tenants’ cash flow and working capital. We cannot predict when and to what extent these delays may occur, nor whether
our business will be adversely impacted.
The CMS regulatory restrictions on reimbursement for long-term acute care hospitals ("LTACHs") and inpatient rehabilitation
hospitals ("IRFs") can lead to reduced reimbursement for our tenants that operate such facilities and departments. CMS continues to
explore restrictions on LTACH and IRF reimbursement focused on more targeted facility and patient level criteria.
The Reform Law enacted in 2010 represented a major shift in the U.S. healthcare industry by, among other things, allowing
millions of formerly uninsured individuals to obtain health insurance coverage and by significantly expanding Medicaid.
In addition to the items above, governments may look for cost cutting measures (similar to what the U.S. is currently doing) to
balance budgets and/or control government deficits. Such cost cutting measures may add pressure on healthcare reimbursement to our
tenants, some of which rely heavily on such reimbursements.
We cannot predict with absolute precision how these changes will affect the long-term financial condition of our tenants.
However, any significant negative impact to our tenants could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations and could negatively affect our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.
Significant regulation and loss of licensure or certification or failure to obtain licensure or certification could negatively impact
our tenants' financial condition and results of operations and affect their ability to make payments to us.
The U.S. healthcare industry is highly regulated by federal, state, and local laws and is directly affected by federal conditions of
participation, state licensing requirements, facility inspections, state and federal reimbursement policies, regulations concerning
capital and other expenditures, certification requirements and other such laws, regulations, and rules. As with the U.S. healthcare
industry, our tenants in the U.K., South America, and other parts of Europe are also subject in some instances to comparable types of
laws, regulations, and rules that affect their ownership and operation of healthcare facilities. Although our lease and mortgage loan
agreements require our tenants/borrowers to comply with applicable laws, and we intend for these facilities to comply with such laws,
we do not actively monitor compliance. Therefore, we cannot offer any assurance that our tenants/borrowers will be found to be in
compliance with such, as the same may ultimately be implemented or interpreted.
From time-to-time, our tenants are subject to various federal and state inquiries, investigations, and other proceedings and would
expect such governmental compliance and enforcement activities to be ongoing at any given time with respect to one or more of our
tenants, either on a confidential or public basis. An adverse result to our tenant/borrower in one or more such governmental
proceedings may have a material adverse effect on their operations and financial condition and on its ability to make required lease
and/or loan payments to us. In instances where we have an equity investment in the operator, in addition to the effect on these
tenants’/borrowers’ ability to meet their financial obligation to us, our ownership and investment interests may be negatively
impacted.
In the U.S., licensed health care facilities must comply with minimum health and safety standards and are subject to survey and
inspection by state and federal agencies and their agents or affiliates, including CMS, The Joint Commission, and state departments of
health. CMS develops Conditions of Participation and Conditions for Coverage that health care organizations must meet in order to
begin and continue participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and receive payment under such programs. These minimum
health and safety standards are aimed at improving quality and protecting the health and safety of beneficiaries, and there are several
common criteria that exist across health entities. The failure to comply with any of these standards could jeopardize a healthcare
organization’s Medicare certification and, in turn, its right to receive payment under the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Further, many hospitals and other institutional providers in the U.S. are accredited by accrediting organizations, such as The
Joint Commission. The Joint Commission was created to accredit healthcare providers, including our tenants that meet its minimum
health and safety standards. A national accrediting organization, such as The Joint Commission, enforces standards that meet or
exceed such requirements. Once hospitals achieve a minimum number of patients and approximately every three years thereafter,
surveyors for The Joint Commission conduct on site surveys of facilities for compliance with a multitude of patient safety, treatment,
and administrative requirements. Facilities may lose accreditation for failure to meet such requirements, which in turn may result in
the loss of license or certification including under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, as well as inability to participate in certain
managed care plans, which require the healthcare provider to be accredited.

35
Finally, healthcare facility reimbursement practices and quality of care issues may result in loss of license or certification, such
as engaging in the practice of “upcoding,” whereby services are billed for higher procedure codes, or an event involving poor quality
of care, which leads to the serious injury or death of a patient. The failure of any tenant/borrower to comply with such laws,
requirements, and regulations resulting in a loss of its license would affect its ability to continue its operation of the facility and would
adversely affect its ability to make lease and/or loan payments to us. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations and could negatively affect our ability to service our debt and make distributions.
In addition, establishment of healthcare facilities and transfers of operations of healthcare facilities in the U.S. are typically
subject to regulatory approvals, such as federal antitrust laws and state certificate of need laws in the U.S. Restrictions and delays in
transferring the operations of healthcare facilities, in obtaining new third-party payor contracts, including Medicare and Medicaid
provider agreements, and in receiving licensure and certification approval from appropriate state and federal agencies by new tenants,
may affect our ability to terminate lease agreements, remove tenants that violate lease terms, and replace existing tenants with new
tenants. Furthermore, these matters may affect a new tenant’s/borrower’s ability to obtain reimbursement for services rendered, which
could adversely affect its ability to make lease and/or loan payments to us. In instances where we have an equity investment in the
operator, in addition to the effect on these tenants’/borrowers’ ability to meet their financial obligations to us, our ownership and
investment interests may also be negatively impacted.
Our tenants are subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make
payments to us and adversely affect their profitability.
As noted earlier, in the U.S., the federal government and numerous state governments have passed laws and regulations that
attempt to eliminate healthcare fraud and abuse by prohibiting business arrangements that induce patient referrals, the ordering of
specific ancillary services, or the submission of false claims for payment. The trend towards increased investigation and enforcement
activity in the areas of fraud and abuse and patient self-referrals to detect and eliminate fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid
programs is likely to continue in future years. As described above, the penalties for violations of these laws can be substantial and may
result in the imposition of criminal and civil penalties and possible exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs. Imposition
of any of these penalties upon any of our tenants could jeopardize a tenant’s ability to operate a facility or to make lease and/or loan
payments, thereby potentially adversely affecting us.
In the case of an acquisition of a provider’s operations, some of our tenants have accepted an assignment of the previous
operator’s Medicare provider agreement. Such operators that take assignment of Medicare provider agreements might be subject to
liability for federal or state regulatory, civil, and criminal investigations of the previous owner’s operations and claims submissions.
These types of issues may not be discovered prior to purchase or after our tenants commence operations in these facilities. Adverse
decisions, fines, or recoupments might negatively impact our tenants’ financial condition, and in turn their ability to make lease and/or
loan payments to us.
Certain of our lease arrangements may be subject to laws related to fraud and abuse or physician self-referrals.
Physician investment in subsidiaries that lease our facilities could subject our leases to scrutiny under fraud and abuse and
physician self-referral laws. Under the Stark Law, and its implementing regulations, if our leases do not satisfy the requirements of an
applicable exception, the ability of our tenants to bill for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries pursuant to referrals from
physician investors could be adversely impacted and subject our tenants to fines, which could impact our tenants’ ability to make lease
and/or loan payments to us. In instances where we have an equity investment in our tenants’ operations, in addition to the effect on the
tenants’ ability to meet their financial obligations to us, our ownership and investment interests may also be negatively impacted.
Therefore, in all cases, we intend to use our good faith efforts to structure our lease arrangements to comply with these laws.
We may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make our healthcare properties suitable for other tenants.
Healthcare facilities are typically highly customized and subject to healthcare-specific building code requirements. The
improvements generally required to conform a property to healthcare use can be costly and at times tenant-specific. A new or
replacement operator may require different features in a property, depending on that operator’s particular business. If a current
operator is unable to pay rent and/or vacates a property, we may incur substantial expenditures to modify a property before we are able
to secure another tenant. Also, if the property needs to be renovated to accommodate multiple tenants, or regulatory requirements, we
may incur substantial expenditures before we are able to re-lease the space. These expenditures or renovations may have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

36
State certificate of need laws may adversely affect our development of facilities and the operations of our tenants.
Certain healthcare facilities in which we invest may be subject to state laws in the U.S. which require regulatory approval in the
form of a certificate of need prior to the transfer of a healthcare facility or prior to initiation of certain projects, including the
establishment of new or replacement facilities, the addition of beds, the addition or expansion of services, and certain capital
expenditures. State certificate of need laws are not uniform throughout the U.S., are subject to change, and may delay developments of
facilities or acquisitions or certain other transfers of ownership of facilities. We cannot predict the impact of state certificate of need
laws on any of the preceding activities or on the operations of our tenants. Certificate of need laws often materially impact the ability
of competitors to enter into the marketplace of our facilities. As a result, a portion of the value of the facility may be related to the
limitation on new competitors. In the event of a change in the certificate of need laws, this value may markedly change.
Regulatory restrictions on REIT transactions could adversely affect our business.
On January 8, 2025, Massachusetts enacted House Bill 5159, which increases regulatory oversight of healthcare transactions
involving REITs. The law prohibits certain sale-leaseback transactions for acute-care hospitals, restricts the issuances of new hospital
licenses for facilities leased from REITS, and subjects REIT investments to enhanced transaction reviews and financial reporting
requirements.
These restrictions may limit our ability to acquire and lease hospital properties in Massachusetts and, if similar restrictions are
widely adopted in other states, such restrictions may limit our ability to acquire and lease hospital properties, delay transactions,
increase compliance costs, and expose us to greater regulatory and legal risk, which may adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
We depend on key personnel, the loss of any one of whom may threaten our ability to operate our business successfully.
We depend on the services of our executives and other officers to carry out our business and investment strategy. If we were to
lose any of these, it may be more difficult for us to locate attractive acquisition targets, complete our acquisitions, and manage the
facilities that we have acquired or developed. Additionally, we will continue to need to attract and retain additional qualified officers
and employees. The loss of the services of any of our officers, or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future,
could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Pursuant to Maryland law, our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of deterring changes in
management and third-party acquisition proposals, which in turn could depress the price of our common stock or cause
dilution.
Our charter contains ownership limitations that may restrict business combination opportunities, inhibit change of control
transactions, and reduce the value of our common stock. To qualify as a REIT under the Code, no more than 50% in value of our
outstanding stock, after taking into account options to acquire stock, may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer persons
during the last half of each taxable year. Our charter generally prohibits direct or indirect ownership by any person of more than 9.8%
in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of outstanding shares of any class or series of our securities, including our
common stock. Generally, our common stock owned by affiliated owners will be aggregated for purposes of the ownership limitation.
The ownership limitation could have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a change in control or other transaction in which
holders of common stock might receive a premium for their common stock over the then-current market price or which such holders
otherwise might believe to be in their best interests. The ownership limitation provisions also may make our common stock an
unsuitable investment vehicle for any person seeking to obtain, either alone or with others as a group, ownership of more than 9.8% of
either the value or number of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may impede third-party acquisition proposals. Our charter and bylaws also
provide restrictions on replacing or removing directors. Directors may be removed by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds
of our common stock. Additionally, stockholders are required to give us advance notice of director nominations. Special meetings of
stockholders can only be called by our president, our Board, or the holders of at least 25% of stock entitled to vote at the meetings.
These and other charter and bylaw provisions may delay or prevent a change of control or other transaction in which holders of our
common stock might receive a premium for their common stock over the then-current market price or which such holders otherwise
might believe to be in their best interests.

37
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security failure of
our technology (or that of our third-party vendors) could harm our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic
information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, and maintaining
personal identifying information (in accordance with GDPR law in Europe and similar laws elsewhere) along with tenant and lease
data. We purchase or license some of our information technology from vendors. We rely on commercially available systems, software,
tools, and monitoring to provide security for the processing, transmission, and storage of confidential data. Although we have taken
steps to protect the security of our information systems and the data maintained in those systems, it is possible that our safety and
security measures will not prevent the systems’ improper functioning or the improper access or disclosure of our or our tenant’s
information, such as in the event of cyber-attacks. Further, our failure to protect the security of our information systems and data
maintained in those systems could subject us to liability under various U.S. federal and state, and foreign privacy laws and regulations.
Even well-protected information systems remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in security breaches evolve
and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may
not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other
preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.
A security breach, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar breaches, or other
significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems (or that of our third-party vendors) could:
•
disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations, possibly for an extended
period of time;
•
result in misstated financial reports, violations of loan covenants, and/or missed reporting deadlines;
•
result in our inability to properly monitor our compliance with regulations regarding our qualification as a REIT;
•
result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation, or release of proprietary,
confidential, sensitive, or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against
us or for disruptive, destructive, or otherwise harmful purposes;
•
require management attention and resources to remedy any resulting damages;
•
subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties; or
•
damage our reputation among our tenants and investors generally.
Any of the foregoing could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Unfavorable resolution of pending and future litigation, regulatory proceedings, or governmental inquiries could have a
material adverse effect on our and our tenants' business, results of operations, financial condition, and reputation.
We are, and from time-to-time may be, involved in litigation, regulatory proceedings and other governmental inquiries. In
particular, recent media and political focus on private investments in healthcare has led to heightened regulatory focus in this area,
including Congressional efforts to increase federal oversight over healthcare facilities and an increase in SEC enforcement activity and
government investigations relating to certain of our assets and tenants. An unfavorable resolution of pending or future litigation,
regulatory proceedings, governmental inquiries, or other claims could have a material adverse effect on our and our tenants’ business,
results of operations and financial condition. Regardless of outcome, any litigation, regulatory proceeding or governmental inquiry,
and related adverse publicity, may result in substantial costs and expenses, significantly divert the attention of management, and
materially damage our reputation. An unfavorable outcome may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments, or
settlements, which, if not indemnifiable by our tenants, or if uninsured, or if exceeding insurance coverage, could adversely impact our
financial condition, cash flows, results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock.
Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely affect us and the reported financial performance of our tenants.
Uncertainties posed by various initiatives of accounting standard-setting by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) and the SEC, which create and interpret applicable accounting standards for U.S. companies, may change the financial
accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of our
financial statements.
These changes could have a material impact on our reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we
could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in potentially material restatements of prior period
financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on our tenants’/borrowers’ reported financial condition or
results of operations or could affect our tenants’ preferences regarding leasing real estate.

38
TAX RISKS
Loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our common stock.
We believe that we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2024. In addition, we own a
direct interest in several subsidiary REITs that have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing
with the 2019 and 2022 tax years, respectively. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex, and interpretations of the
U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will be
successful in operating so as to qualify as a REIT. At any time, new laws, regulations, interpretations, or court decisions may change
the U.S. federal or state tax laws relating to, or the U.S. federal or state income tax consequences of, qualification as a REIT. It is
possible that future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause our Board to revoke the REIT election, which it
may do without stockholder approval.
If we lose or revoke our REIT status (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not yet
expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for distribution because we would not
be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income; therefore, we would be subject to U.S.
federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and we might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay any such tax. We also
could be subject to increased state and local taxes. Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we also would be
disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify.
Separately, as of July 1, 2023, the majority of our real estate operations in the U.K. operate as a U.K. REIT and generally are
subject only to a withholding tax on earnings upon distribution out of the U.K. REIT. If we were to fail the requirements of a U.K.
REIT, the related U.K. operations would be subject to higher tax rates like non-REITs.
As a result of all these factors, a loss or revocation of our REIT status could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations and would adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Failure to make required distributions as a REIT would increase our tax burden.
In order to qualify as a U.S. REIT, each year we must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income,
excluding net capital gains. To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable
income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4%
nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary
income for that year; (2) 95% of our capital gain net income for that year; and (3) 100% of our undistributed taxable income from
prior years.
We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily
available for distribution. Differences in timing between the recognition of income and the related cash receipts or the effect of
required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow money or sell assets to pay out enough of our taxable income to
satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. In the future, we may
borrow to pay distributions to our stockholders. Any funds that we borrow would subject us to interest rate and other market risks.
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the
sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders, and the ownership of
our stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego attractive business or investment opportunities. Currently, no
more than 20% of the value of our assets may consist of securities of one or more TRS and no more than 25% of the value of our
assets may consist of securities that are not qualifying assets under the test requiring that 75% of a REIT’s assets consist of real estate
and other related assets. In addition, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources and at least
75% of our gross income must be generated from either rents from real estate or interest on loans secured by real estate (i.e. mortgage
loans). Further, a TRS may not directly or indirectly operate or manage a healthcare facility. Compliance with current and future
changes to REIT requirements may limit our flexibility in executing our business plan.
A significant portion of our U.K. properties were restructured into a U.K. REIT as of July 1, 2023. Similar to the U.S. REIT
qualification requirements, we must satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our U.K. income, the nature and
diversification of our U.K. assets, the amounts we distribute to the shareholders of the U.K. REIT, and the ownership of the U.K.
REIT shares. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego attractive business or investment opportunities.

39
If certain sale-leaseback transactions are not characterized by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or similar tax authorities
internationally as “true leases,” we may be subject to adverse tax consequences.
We have purchased certain properties and leased them back to the sellers of such properties. We intend for any such sale-
leaseback transactions to be structured in a manner that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease,” thereby allowing us to be
treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, depending on the terms of any specific
transaction, taxing authorities might take the position that the transaction is not a “true lease”. In the event any sale-leaseback
transaction is challenged and successfully re-characterized, we might not be able to deduct depreciation expense on the real estate,
resulting in potential higher income taxes.
Transactions with TRSs may be subject to excise tax.
We have historically entered into leases and other transactions with our TRS and its subsidiaries and expect to continue to do so
in the future. Under applicable rules, transactions such as leases between our TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on a
market terms basis may be subject to a 100% excise tax. While we believe that all of our transactions with our TRS are at arm’s
length, imposition of a 100% excise tax could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Loans to our tenants could be characterized as equity, in which case our income from that tenant might not be qualifying
income under the REIT rules and we could lose our REIT status.
Our TRS may make loans to tenants of our facilities to acquire operations or for working capital purposes. The IRS may take the
position that certain loans to tenants should be treated as equity interests rather than debt, and that our interest income from such
tenant should not be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. If the IRS were to successfully treat a
loan to a particular tenant as an equity interest, the tenant would be a “related party tenant” with respect to our company and the rent
that we receive from the tenant would not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. As a result, we could be
in jeopardy of failing the 75% income test discussed above, which if we did would cause us to lose our REIT status. In addition, if the
IRS were to successfully treat a particular loan as interests held by our operating partnership rather than by our TRS, we could fail the
5% asset test, and if the IRS further successfully treated the loan as other than straight debt, we could fail the 10% asset test with
respect to such interest. As a result of the failure of either test, we could lose our REIT status, which would subject us to corporate
level income tax and adversely affect our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders.
Certain transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.
From time-to-time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties, including by contributing properties as part
of joint venture investments. Under the Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as inventory or primarily for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. We
do not believe that our transfers or disposals of property or our contributions of properties into joint venture investments are prohibited
transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and
circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The IRS may contend that these types of transfers or dispositions are prohibited
transactions. While we believe that the IRS would not prevail in any such dispute, if the IRS were to argue successfully that a transfer,
disposition, or contribution of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any
gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our
ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.
Changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations, including changes to tax rates, may adversely affect our results of operations.
We are headquartered in the U.S. with subsidiaries and investments globally and are subject to income taxes in these
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe that we have
adequately assessed and accounted for our potential tax liabilities, and that our tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance
that additional taxes will not be due upon audit of our tax returns or as a result of changes to applicable tax laws. The U.S.
government, as well as the governments of many of the locations in which we operate (such as Germany, the U.K., Colombia,
Portugal, Spain, Finland, and Luxembourg, which is where most of our Europe entities are domiciled) are actively discussing changes
to corporate taxation. Our future tax expense could be adversely affected by these changes in tax laws or their interpretation, both
domestically and internationally. Potential tax reforms being considered by many countries include changes that could impact, among
other things, global tax reporting, intercompany transfer pricing arrangements, the definition of taxable permanent establishments, and
other legal or financial arrangements. The nature and timing of any changes to each jurisdiction’s tax laws and the impact on our
future tax exposure both in the U.S. and abroad cannot be predicted with any accuracy but could materially and adversely impact our
results of operations and cash flows.

40
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 1C. Cybersecurity
Cyber Risk Management and Strategy
We have developed, implemented, and continue to maintain processes and procedures to identify and mitigate cybersecurity
risks across our company (including our offices in Europe). Because we rely on various information technology systems and software
programs to operate our business, we have an extensive cybersecurity program designed to protect our properties and confidential
data. Our cybersecurity risk management and strategy program includes the following:
•
implementing the latest software releases and tools (including multi-factor authentication) in a timely manner;
•
seek to minimize the amount of personal information collected and stored about our employees and seek to avoid any
collection and storage of non-financial or contact information from our tenants/borrowers;
•
constant security monitoring of computers, networks, and cloud-based information assets to detect and respond to
cybersecurity risks and threats;
•
third party internal and external vulnerability assessments and penetration testing;
•
annual review and audit of cyber controls and procedures;
•
periodic review of cybersecurity procedures and implementation of new procedures as necessary to adhere to
cybersecurity standards set forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology;
•
periodic evaluation and review of cybersecurity risks associated with our use of key third-party business partners, vendors,
and service providers. Because we do not control the systems or cybersecurity plans put in place by such third parties, and
we may have limited contractual protections with such parties, we may be negatively impacted as a result of threats or
incidents experienced by such third parties;
•
security awareness training provided during employee onboarding process and successful completion required at least
annually for all employees with passing requirements;
•
employee anti-phishing campaigns performed at least quarterly;
•
a cybersecurity incident response plan, which is reviewed annually, but generally consists of a coordinated approach to
investigating, containing, documenting, and reporting findings and keeping management and others informed and
involved as appropriate; and
•
a cybersecurity risk insurance policy.
We have not identified any known cybersecurity threats or incidents within the prior year that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our overall business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. Although
we have taken steps to protect the security of our information systems and the data maintained in those systems, there is no guarantee
the measures and security we have implemented will be successful in detecting and preventing a cybersecurity incident. Please refer to
Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding additional risks related to cybersecurity and information
technology.
Cyber Governance
Cybersecurity holds a pivotal role in our comprehensive risk management processes and is a key focus for both our Board and
management. Our management has primary responsibility for identifying, assessing, and managing our exposure to cybersecurity
threats and incidents. However, the Board, led by members of the Risk Committee, oversees the enterprise risk management process,
specifically addressing material risks stemming from cybersecurity threats.
The Board receives regular updates from the Computer Security Incident Response Team (“CSIRT”) to provide insight into
significant cybersecurity risks, potential impacts on business operations, and management's strategies for identifying, monitoring, and
mitigating these risks. This includes sharing results from assessments or audits of relevant processes.

41
Led by our Director of Information Technology and Security (“Director of IT”) with years of experience in Information
Technology, our CSIRT, comprising cross-functional professionals, collaborates to execute our cybersecurity risk assessment and
management processes by reviewing and assessing cybersecurity initiatives, including the incident response plan, cybersecurity
compliance, training, and overall risk management efforts. The collaborative efforts of the Board and our skilled CSIRT team
underscore our commitment to effectively addressing and mitigating cybersecurity risks within the organization.

42
ITEM 2. Properties
At December 31, 2024, our portfolio (including properties in our five real estate joint ventures) consisted of 396 properties
(including properties under construction or in the form of a first lien mortgage loan) operated by 53 different operators. Our vacant
facilities represent less than 1% of total assets at December 31, 2024.
Total
Properties
Total 2024
Revenues
Total
Assets(A)
(Dollars in thousands)
United States:
Alabama ..........................................................................................................
2
$
793
$
6,423
Arizona............................................................................................................
10
39,146
379,801
Arkansas..........................................................................................................
1
10,671
67,536
California.........................................................................................................
17
92,200
935,470
Colorado..........................................................................................................
3
15,720
104,079
Connecticut......................................................................................................
3
35
176,087
Florida.............................................................................................................
6
18,168
840,876 (B)
Idaho ...............................................................................................................
6
36,993
295,533
Indiana.............................................................................................................
4
7,122
60,374
Iowa ................................................................................................................
1
5,365
46,483
Kansas.............................................................................................................
9
15,048
208,913 (B)
Kentucky .........................................................................................................
1
4,797
54,746
Louisiana.........................................................................................................
6
5,539
109,955
Massachusetts..................................................................................................
2
877
226,331
Michigan .........................................................................................................
2
3,028
19,678
Missouri...........................................................................................................
4
22,095
121,529
Montana...........................................................................................................
1
1,964
18,904
New Jersey ......................................................................................................
2
29,187
146,080
New Mexico ....................................................................................................
2
5,240
49,488
North Carolina .................................................................................................
1
3,145
30,938
Ohio ................................................................................................................
9
27,791
327,577 (B)
Oklahoma ........................................................................................................
2
7,618
70,188
Oregon.............................................................................................................
1
12,516
83,586
Pennsylvania....................................................................................................
9
31,973
298,684
South Carolina .................................................................................................
6
16,995
127,594
Texas...............................................................................................................
48
91,782
1,394,296 (C)
Utah.................................................................................................................
7
37,248
147,782 (E)
Virginia ...........................................................................................................
2
790
16,286
Washington......................................................................................................
2
4,297
36,435
Wisconsin........................................................................................................
1
3,594
21,554
Wyoming.........................................................................................................
3
9,936
91,401
Other assets......................................................................................................
—
—
951,486
Total United States...........................................................................................
173
$
561,673
$
7,466,093
International:
Colombia.........................................................................................................
4
$
5,177
$
141,508
Germany..........................................................................................................
85
40,662
672,343 (E)
Italy.................................................................................................................
8
—
77,592 (E)
Portugal ...........................................................................................................
2
3,571
45,647
Spain ...............................................................................................................
9
11,534
247,996 (D)(E)
Switzerland......................................................................................................
19
1,015
719,632 (E)
United Kingdom ..............................................................................................
92
359,991
3,985,672
Finland ............................................................................................................
4
11,924
199,721
Other assets......................................................................................................
—
—
738,390
Total International............................................................................................
223
$
433,874
$
6,828,501
Total ...............................................................................................................
396
$
995,547
$
14,294,594
(A)
Represents total assets at December 31, 2024.
(B)
Includes one facility that was vacant at December 31, 2024.
(C)
Includes a development project still under construction and facilities that were vacant at December 31, 2024.

43
(D)
Includes development projects still under construction at December 31, 2024.
(E)
For Germany, the U.S., Switzerland, Spain, and Italy, we own properties through five real estate joint venture arrangements. The
table below shows revenues earned from our joint venture arrangements:
Total
Properties
Total 2024 Revenues
(Dollars in thousands)
Germany....................................................................................................
71
$
66,871
U.S.............................................................................................................
5
11,355
Switzerland................................................................................................
19
52,544
Spain..........................................................................................................
2
7,127
Italy ...........................................................................................................
8
6,006
Total..........................................................................................................
105
$
143,903
(1)
The table above does not include $38 million of revenue earned in 2024 from our Massachusetts-based partnership with
Macquarie, which was terminated in the third quarter of 2024.
A breakout of our facilities at December 31, 2024 based on property type is as follows:
Number of
Properties
Total
Square
Footage
Total
Licensed
Beds(A)
General acute care hospitals.........................................................................................
173
28,183,587
17,474
Behavioral health facilities...........................................................................................
69
3,158,336
4,363
Post acute care facilities...............................................................................................
133
14,096,656
17,246
FSERs...........................................................................................................................
21
179,081
—
396
45,617,660
39,083
(A)
Excludes our facilities that are under development.
The following table shows lease and loan expirations, assuming that none of the tenants/borrowers exercise any of their renewal
options (dollars in thousands):
Total Lease and Loan Portfolio(1)
Total
Leases/
Loans(2)
Annualized
Base
Rent/
Interest(3)
% of Total
Annualized
Base
Rent/
Interest
Total
Square
Footage
Total
Licensed
Beds
2025..............................................................................
3
$
4,962
0.5%
442,947
241
2026..............................................................................
2
1,152
0.1%
23,782
24
2027..............................................................................
3
4,788
0.5%
622,778
140
2028..............................................................................
8
20,880
2.0%
2,281,409
548
2029..............................................................................
6
16,247
1.5%
808,610
527
2030..............................................................................
9
6,205
0.6%
205,795
59
2031..............................................................................
4
4,919
0.5%
172,655
89
2032..............................................................................
22
57,079
5.3%
1,067,663
754
2033..............................................................................
5
6,201
0.6%
85,477
24
2034..............................................................................
15
108,437
10.2%
2,526,898
2,186
Thereafter .....................................................................
296
837,301
78.2%
34,581,624
33,240
Total .............................................................................
373
$
1,068,171
100.0%
42,819,638
37,832
(1)
Schedule includes leases and mortgage loans and related terms as of December 31, 2024.
(2)
Reflects all properties, including those that are part of real estate joint ventures, except vacant properties (less than 1% of total
assets), facilities that are under development, and transitioning properties.
(3)
Represents base rent/interest income contractually owed per the lease/loan agreements on an annualized basis as of period end
(including foreign currency exchange rates) but does not include tenant recoveries, additional rents and other lease-related
adjustments to revenue (i.e., straight-line rents and deferred revenues), or any reserves or write-offs.

44
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
We are party to various lawsuits as further described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We have not recorded a liability related to these lawsuits because, at this time, we are unable to determine
whether an unfavorable outcome is possible or to estimate reasonably possible losses.
In addition to the foregoing, we are currently and have in the past been subject to various other legal proceedings and regulatory
actions in connection with our business. We believe that the resolution of any current pending legal or regulatory matters will not have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Nonetheless, we cannot predict the
outcome of these proceedings, as legal and regulatory matters are subject to inherent uncertainties, and there exists the possibility that
the ultimate resolution of such matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows, results of
operations, and the trading price of our common stock.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MPW.” The following table sets forth the
high and low sales prices for the common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Tape, and the dividends per share declared by us with respect to each such period.
High
Low
Dividends
Year Ended December 31, 2024
First Quarter ........................................................................................................................
$
5.16
$
2.92
$
—
Second Quarter....................................................................................................................
6.54
3.94
0.30
Third Quarter.......................................................................................................................
6.55
3.92
0.08
Fourth Quarter.....................................................................................................................
5.91
3.63
0.08
Year Ended December 31, 2023
First Quarter ........................................................................................................................
$
14.00
$
7.10
$
0.29
Second Quarter....................................................................................................................
9.41
7.20
0.29
Third Quarter.......................................................................................................................
10.74
4.97
0.15
Fourth Quarter.....................................................................................................................
5.77
4.04
0.15
On February 28, 2025, the closing price for our common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $5.90 per
share. As of February 28, 2025, there were 37 holders of record of our common stock. This figure does not reflect the beneficial
ownership of shares held in nominee name.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Stock repurchases:
The table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2024:
Period
Total number of
shares purchased(1)
(in thousands)
Average price
per share
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced
programs
(in thousands)
Approximate dollar
value of shares that
may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs
(in thousands)
October 1-October 31, 2024 ..........
94
$
5.89
—
(1)
The number of shares purchased consists of shares of common stock tendered by employees to satisfy the employees' tax
withholding obligations arising as a result of vesting of restricted stock awards under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the
"Equity Incentive Plan"), which shares were purchased based on their fair market value on the vesting date.

45
The following graph provides a comparison of cumulative total stockholder returns for the period from December 31, 2019
through December 31, 2024, among us, the S&P 500 Index, MSCI U.S. REIT Index, and Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Health Care
Index. The stock performance graph assumes an investment of $100 in us and the three indices, and the reinvestment of dividends.
The historical information below is not indicative of future performance.
Period Ending
Index
12/31/2019
12/31/2020
12/31/2021
12/31/2022
12/31/2023
12/31/2024
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.......................................
100.00
109.05
124.60
63.54
31.62
28.07
S&P 500 Index.............................................................
100.00
118.40
152.39
124.79
157.59
197.02
MSCI U.S. REIT Index................................................
100.00
92.43
132.23
99.82
113.54
123.47
Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Health Care Index ..........
100.00
90.20
104.84
81.93
93.29
120.49
The graph and accompanying text shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by
reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 6. [Reserved]

46
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless otherwise indicated, references to “our,” “we,” and “us” in this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations refer to Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including MPT Operating
Partnership, L.P.
Overview
We are a self-advised healthcare REIT that was incorporated in Maryland on August 27, 2003, primarily for the purpose of
investing in and owning healthcare facilities to be leased to healthcare operators under long-term net leases. We may also make
mortgage loans to healthcare operators that are collateralized by the underlying real estate. We conduct our business operations in one
segment. We currently have healthcare investments in the U.S., Europe, and South America. Our existing tenants are, and our
prospective tenants will generally be, healthcare operating companies and other healthcare providers that use substantial real estate
assets in their operations. We offer financing to these operators through 100% lease and mortgage financing and generally seek lease
and loan terms on a long-term basis (typically at least 15 years) with a series of shorter renewal terms, generally in five year
increments, at the option of our tenants and borrowers. We also have included and intend to include in our lease and loan agreements
annual contractual minimum rate increases. Our existing portfolio’s minimum escalators are typically 2.0%. In addition, most of our
leases and loans include rate increases based on the general rate of inflation (based on CPI or similar indices) if greater than the
minimum contractual increases. Beyond rent or mortgage interest, our leases and loans typically require our tenants to pay all
operating costs and expenses associated with the facility. Finally, from time-to-time, we may make noncontrolling investments in our
tenants, typically in conjunction with larger real estate transactions with the tenant, that give us a right to share in such tenant’s profits
and losses and provide for certain minority rights and protections.
We may make other loans to certain of our operators through our TRSs, which the operators use for working capital. Although it
represents less than 1% of our total assets at December 31, 2024, we consider our lending business an important element of our overall
business strategy for two primary reasons: (1) it provides opportunities to make income-earning investments that could yield attractive
risk-adjusted returns in an industry in which our management has expertise, and (2) by making debt capital available to certain
qualified operators, we believe we create a competitive advantage for our company over other buyers of, and financing sources for,
healthcare facilities.
At December 31, 2024, our portfolio (including real estate assets in joint ventures) consisted of 396 properties, of which 388
properties are leased or loaned to 53 operators, including facilities under development or in the form of mortgage loans.
The information set forth in this Item 7 is intended to provide readers with an understanding of our financial condition, changes
in financial condition, and results of operations. This section generally discusses the results of our operations for the year ended
December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2023 compared
to the year ended December 31, 2022, please refer to Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2023, filed with the SEC on February 29, 2024.

47
Selected Financial Data
The following sets forth selected consolidated financial and operating data. You should read the following selected financial
data in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of each of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and MPT
Operating Partnership, L.P. and their respective subsidiaries included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
(In thousands except per share data)
OPERATING DATA
Total revenues ....................................................................................................................
$
995,547
$
871,799
Expenses:
Interest............................................................................................................................
417,824
411,171
Real estate depreciation and amortization......................................................................
447,657
603,360
Property-related..............................................................................................................
27,255
41,567
General and administrative.............................................................................................
133,789
145,588
Total expenses ....................................................................................................................
1,026,525
1,201,686
Other (expense) income:
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate.....................................................................................
478,693
(1,815)
Real estate and other impairment charges, net...............................................................
(1,825,402)
(376,907)
(Loss) earnings from equity interests .............................................................................
(366,642)
13,967
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing (costs) benefit .............................................
(4,292)
285
Other (including fair value adjustments on securities)...................................................
(615,565)
7,586
Income tax (expense) benefit..............................................................................................
(44,101)
130,679
Net loss...............................................................................................................................
(2,408,287)
(556,092)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests..........................................................
(1,984)
(384)
Net loss attributable to MPT common stockholders ..........................................................
$
(2,410,271)
$
(556,476)
Net loss attributable to MPT common stockholders per
diluted share.....................................................................................................................
$
(4.02)
$
(0.93)
Weighted-average shares outstanding — basic and diluted...............................................
600,248
598,518
OTHER DATA
Dividends declared per common share...............................................................................
$
0.46
$
0.88
FFO(1)................................................................................................................................
$
(1,400,123)
$
287,793
Normalized FFO(1) ............................................................................................................
$
482,705
$
951,066
Normalized FFO per share(1).............................................................................................
$
0.80
$
1.59
Cash paid for acquisitions and other related investments ..................................................
$
105,618
$
212,287
December 31,
2024
2023
(In thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Real estate assets — at cost ...........................................................................................................
$
12,471,543
$
14,778,132
Real estate accumulated depreciation/amortization.......................................................................
(1,422,948)
(1,407,971)
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................................................................................
332,335
250,016
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures...............................................................
1,156,397
1,474,455
Investments in unconsolidated operating entities..........................................................................
439,578
1,778,640
Other loans.....................................................................................................................................
109,175
292,615
Other ..............................................................................................................................................
1,208,514
1,138,957
Total assets.....................................................................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
Debt, net.........................................................................................................................................
$
8,848,112
$
10,064,236
Other liabilities ..............................................................................................................................
612,699
606,743
Total Medical Properties Trust, Inc. stockholders’ equity.............................................................
4,832,729
7,631,600
Non-controlling interests ...............................................................................................................
1,054
2,265
Total equity................................................................................................................................
4,833,783
7,633,865
Total liabilities and equity .............................................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
(1)
See section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of why these non-GAAP financial measures are useful
along with a reconciliation to our GAAP earnings.

48
2024 Highlights
In 2024, our focus was on improving our liquidity position, managing our near-term debt maturities, and securing as much value
as possible while exiting our relationship with Steward. In regard to improving liquidity, we set a target to generate $2 billion of
liquidity in 2024, which we surpassed by approximately $800 million through a combination of real estate asset sales (discussed
below) that resulted in approximately $500 million of gains on sale and closing on a new secured loan facility with a 10-year term for
approximately £631 million (approximately $800 million). In addition, we reduced our dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.08 per
share for the last two quarters of the year, which resulted in cash savings of approximately $40 million per quarter. With these
liquidity proceeds in 2024 and those from our private offering of notes (discussed below) shortly after year-end, along with our ability
to extend our revolving credit facility for an additional year (subject to certain conditions), we have successfully cleared all debt
maturities through June 30, 2027, other than one issue of unsecured notes of €500 million due in October 2026. In regard to Steward,
the bankruptcy court approved a global settlement in September 2024 between Steward, its lenders, the unsecured creditors
committee, and us. The settlement is more fully described in "Significant Tenants"; however, in summary, the settlement effectively
ended our relationship with Steward and allowed us to regain control of 23 of our properties and begin the process of re-tenanting the
properties as discussed below.
See below for more detail on our 2024 activities:
•
Disposal transactions:
(1)
Generated approximately $130 million from the sale of our interest in the Priory syndicated term loan and
remaining minority interest in Lifepoint Behavioral in the 2024 first quarter;
(2)
Sold five properties in April 2024 to Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Prime") for $350 million, including a
$100 million interest-bearing mortgage loan that was subsequently fully paid in August 2024, realizing a gain on
sale of approximately $53 million;
(3)
Sold our controlling interest in five Utah hospitals in April 2024 for an aggregate agreed valuation of
approximately $1.2 billion to a newly formed joint venture with an institutional asset manager. We recognized a
gain on sale of the real estate of approximately $380 million and retained an approximately 25% interest in the
partnership valued initially at approximately $108 million. In conjunction with this transaction closing, the joint
venture placed new non-recourse secured financing on the properties, providing $190 million of additional cash
to us. In total, we received approximately $1.1 billion of cash proceeds from this transaction;
(4)
Completed the sale of eight properties to Dignity Health in July 2024 for approximately $160 million, realizing a
gain on sale of $85 million;
(5)
Completed the sale of 11 properties to UCHealth in August 2024 for approximately $86 million, realizing a gain
on sale of $40 million;
(6)
Completed the sale of Watsonville Community Hospital in Watsonville, California in October 2024 for proceeds
of approximately $40 million, and two freestanding emergency department facilities in Texas for approximately
$5 million. In addition, we received approximately $47 million in October 2024 from proceeds generated by the
sale of three Space Coast properties as previously described in “Significant Tenants”; and
(7)
Completed several small transactions that resulted in approximately $9 million in net proceeds.
•
Additional financing transactions:
(1)
Paid off the remaining A$470 million (approximately $306 million) Australian term loan facility in April 2024;
(2)
Funded and early discharged our British pound sterling secured term loan of approximately £105 million that was
due in December 2024; and
(3)
Amended our credit facility in April and August 2024 which (i) reduced revolving commitments thereunder from
$1.8 billion to $1.28 billion, (ii) modified certain covenants; (iii) required proceeds from asset sales and debt
transactions be used to repay certain loans outstanding; (iv) increased borrowing spreads from 225 basis points to

49
300 basis points; and (v) limited the payment of dividends in cash to $0.08 per share in any fiscal quarter – see
Note 4 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding these amendments.
•
Tenant and property activity:
(1)
Incurred approximately $2.4 billion of impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments in 2024 primarily
related to Steward and Prospect as more fully described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K;
(2)
Re-leased 18 of the former 23 Steward operated facilities to six operators including Honor Health, Quorum
Health, HSA, Insight Health, College Health, and Tenor Health (effective January 2025);
(3)
Recovered from our casualty insurers cash in excess of our recovery receivable related to the 2020 storm losses
at our Norwood redevelopment;
(4)
Completed a building improvement project on an existing general acute care facility in Idaho Falls, Idaho in
October 2024 for a total amount of approximately $50 million and commenced collection of rent; and
(5)
Entered into a new forbearance and restructuring agreement in December 2024 with a former tenant that
represented approximately 1% of our total assets and received $10 million at the signing of this agreement for
unpaid rent.
•
Selected as one of Newsweek’s Most Responsible Companies in 2024.
Subsequent to December 31, 2024, the following activities took place:
•
Repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the British pound sterling term loan due 2025 at maturity in January
2025 of £493 million, with a combination of cash on hand and available capacity under our revolving Credit
Facility;
•
Due to its ongoing operational and liquidity challenges, Prospect filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2025
with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas;
•
Sold two properties in January 2025 for approximately $20 million; and
•
Completed a private notes offering of $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032
and €1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032, proceeds of which were used to
fund the redemption in full of our 3.325% senior notes due 2025, 2.500% senior notes due 2026, and 5.250%
senior notes due 2026, including related accrued interest, fees and expenses. Remaining proceeds were used to
paydown our revolving credit facility, resulting in approximately $1.2 billion of availability at February 28,
2025. Concurrent with the notes offering, we amended our credit facility which, among other things, (i) modified
certain financial covenants and eliminated others including the minimum consolidated tangible net worth
covenant; (ii) lowered borrowing spreads from 300 basis points to 225 basis points; (iii) removed the limitation
on the payment of dividends in cash of $0.08 per share in any fiscal quarter; and (iv) provided for the Credit
Facility to be secured and guaranteed ratably with the newly issued secured notes – see Note 4 to Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding this amendment.
2023 Highlights
In 2023, economic uncertainty, high interest rates, and inflationary pressures affected our business (and that of some of our
tenants) and caused us to look at several initiatives to improve cash flows, reduce costs, and secure the value of our non-performing
assets. In 2023, we completed strategic property sales, highlighted by the sale of our 11 Australia properties for A$1.2 billion. We
used the proceeds from this sale to partially paydown our A$1.2 billion Australian term loan as well as our revolving credit facility. In
regard to cost reduction, we implemented a REIT tax structure in the U.K. in the second quarter of 2023 that provides quarterly
income tax savings. In addition, we reduced our dividend from $0.29 per share per quarter to $0.15 starting with our dividend declared
in the 2023 third quarter, which equates to annual cash savings of approximately $330 million.

50
A summary of additional 2023 activity is as follows:
•
Recorded approximately $700 million in various charges related to our investments in Steward and moved to the cash basis
of accounting at December 31, 2023;
•
Agreed to a restructuring of our investments in Prospect, that included a new investment in PHP Holdings (see Note 3 to
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on this transaction);
•
Reserved approximately $95 million of billed rent/interest receivables and straight-line rent receivables associated with two
other domestic tenants and a loan to our international joint venture and began applying cash basis accounting on these
investments;
•
Received approximately $205 million from Lifepoint to pay off our initial acquisition loan, plus accrued interest, as part of
their acquisition of a majority ownership interest in Springstone (now Lifepoint Behavioral);
•
Sold three facilities to Prime for approximately $100 million;
•
Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado ("CHIC") acquired the Utah hospital operations of five general acute care facilities
previously operated by Steward, and we received $100 million from Steward as a result of this transaction (see Note 3 to
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details);
•
Received CHF 60 million from the payoff of a loan by Infracore;
•
Paid off our £400 million 2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 (of which £50 million was purchased before the
maturity date at a discounted price);
•
Acquired three inpatient rehabilitation facilities for a total of €70 million that are leased to MEDIAN and five behavioral
health hospitals for £44 million that are leased to Priory;
•
Completed two developments for approximately $70 million that are leased to Ernest Health, Inc. (“Ernest”); and
•
Selected as one of Modern Healthcare's Best Places to Work in healthcare in 2023, for the third consecutive year.
Critical Accounting Estimates
In order to prepare financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the U.S., we must make estimates about certain types of
transactions and account balances. We believe that our estimates of the amount and timing of credit losses, fair value adjustments
(either as part of a purchase price allocation, recurring accounting for those investments that we have selected under the fair value
option method, or impairment analyses), and periodic depreciation of our real estate assets, along with our assessment as to whether
investments we make in certain businesses/entities should be consolidated with our results, have significant effects on our financial
statements. Each of these items involves estimates that require us to make subjective judgments. We rely on our experience, collect
historical and current market data, and develop relevant assumptions to arrive at what we believe to be reasonable estimates. Under
different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the critical accounting policies described
below. In addition, application of these critical accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment on the use of assumptions as to
future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. See Note 2 to Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding our accounting policies and recent accounting developments. Our accounting
estimates include the following:
Credit Losses:
Losses from Rent Receivables: For our leases, we review tenant provided financial data and monitor the performance of our
tenants in areas generally consisting of: admission levels and surgery/procedure volumes by type; current operating margins; ratio of
our tenant's operating margins both to facility rent and to facility rent plus other fixed costs; trends in revenue, cash collections, patient
mix; and the effect of evolving healthcare regulations, adverse economic and political conditions, such as rising inflation and interest
rates, and other events ongoing on a tenant's profitability and liquidity.
Losses from Operating Lease Receivables: We utilize the information above along with the tenant's payment and
default history in evaluating (on a property-by-property basis) whether or not a provision for losses on outstanding billed rent
and/or straight-line rent receivables is needed. A provision for losses on rent receivables (including straight-line rent
receivables) is ultimately recorded when it becomes probable that the receivable will not be collected in full. The provision is an
amount which reduces the receivable to its estimated net realizable value based on a determination of the eventual amounts to be
collected either from the debtor or from existing collateral, if any.

51
Losses on Financing Lease Receivables: We apply a forward-looking “expected credit loss” model to all of our
financing receivables, including financing leases and loans. To do this, we group our financial instruments into two primary
pools of similar credit risk: secured and unsecured. The secured instruments include our investments in financing receivables as
all are secured by the underlying real estate, among other collateral. Within the two primary pools, we further group our
instruments into sub-pools based on several tenant/borrower characteristics, including years of experience in the healthcare
industry and in a particular market or region and overall capitalization. We then determine a credit loss percentage per pool
based on our history over a period of time that closely matches the remaining terms of the financial instruments being analyzed
and adjust as needed for current trends or unusual circumstances. We apply these credit loss percentages to the book value of the
related instruments to establish a credit loss reserve on our financing lease receivables and such credit loss reserve (including the
underlying assumptions) is reviewed and adjusted quarterly. If a financing receivable is underperforming and is deemed
uncollectible based on the lessee’s overall financial condition, we will adjust the credit loss reserve based on the fair value of the
underlying collateral.
We exclude interest receivables from the credit loss reserve model. Instead, such receivables are impaired and an
allowance recorded when it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due. Like operating lease
receivables, the need for an allowance is based upon our assessment of the lessee’s overall financial condition, economic
resources and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors, and, if appropriate, the
realizable value of any collateral. Financing leases are placed on non-accrual status when we determine that the collectability of
contractual amounts is not reasonably assured. If on non-accrual status, we generally account for the financing lease on a cash
basis, in which income is recognized only upon receipt of cash.
Loans: Loans consist of mortgage loans, working capital loans, and other loans. Mortgage loans are collateralized by interests in
real property. Working capital and other loans are generally collateralized by interests in receivables and corporate and individual
guarantees. We record loans at cost. Like our financing lease receivables, we establish credit loss reserves on all outstanding loans
based on historical credit losses of similar instruments. Such credit loss reserves, including the underlying assumptions, are reviewed
and adjusted quarterly. If a loan’s performance worsens and foreclosure is deemed probable for our collateral-based loans (after
considering the borrower’s overall financial condition as described above for leases), we will adjust the allowance for expected credit
losses based on the current fair value of such collateral at the time the loan is deemed uncollectible. If the loan is not collateralized, the
loan will be reserved for/written-off once it is determined that such loan is no longer collectible. Interest receivables on loans are
excluded from the forward-looking credit loss reserve model; however, we assess their collectability similar to how we assess
collectability for interest receivables on financing leases described above.
Investments in Real Estate: We maintain our investments in real estate at cost, and we capitalize improvements and
replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. While our tenants are generally responsible for all
operating costs at a facility, in the event we incur costs of repairs and maintenance, we expense those costs as incurred. We compute
depreciation using the straight-line method over the weighted-average useful life of approximately 38.6 years for buildings and
improvements.
When circumstances indicate a possible impairment of the value of our real estate investments, we review the recoverability of
the facility’s carrying value. The review of the recoverability is generally based on our estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows
from the facility’s use and eventual disposition. Our forecast of these cash flows considers factors such as expected future operating
income, market and other applicable trends, and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition, and other
factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a facility on an undiscounted basis, an impairment
loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the facility. In making estimates of fair value
for purposes of impairment assessments, we will look to a number of sources including independent appraisals, available broker data,
or our internal data from recent transactions involving similar properties in similar markets. Given the highly specialized aspects of
our properties, no assurance can be given that future impairment charges will not be taken.
Acquired Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation: For properties acquired for operating leasing purposes, we currently account
for such acquisitions based on asset acquisition accounting rules. Under this accounting method, we allocate the purchase price of
acquired properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their relative fair values. In making estimates of
fair value for purposes of allocating purchase prices of acquired real estate, we may utilize a number of sources, including available
real estate broker data, independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective
property, internal data from previous acquisitions or developments, and other market data, including market comparables for
significant assumptions such as market rental, capitalization, and discount rates. We also consider information obtained about each
property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible
and intangible assets acquired.

52
We record above-market and below-market in-place lease values, if any, for the facilities we own which are based on the present
value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate
of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of
the lease. We amortize any resulting capitalized above-market lease values as a reduction of rental income over the lease term. We
amortize any resulting capitalized below-market lease values as an increase to rental income over the lease term. Because our strategy
to a large degree involves the origination and acquisition of long-term lease arrangements at market rates with independent parties, we
do not expect the above-market or below-market in-place lease values to be significant for many of our transactions.
We measure the aggregate value of other lease intangible assets to be acquired based on the difference between (i) the property
valued with new or in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (ii) the property valued as if vacant when acquired.
Management’s estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow
analysis). Factors considered by management in our analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-
up periods, considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about
each targeted facility as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of
the intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating
expenses, and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, which we expect to be about six months
(based on experience) but can be longer depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute
similar leases including leasing commissions, legal costs, and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already
incurred in connection with a new lease origination.
Other intangible assets acquired may include customer relationship intangible values, which are based on management’s
evaluation of the specific characteristics of each prospective tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that tenant. Characteristics
to be considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the
tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality, and expectations of lease renewals,
including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement, among other factors. At December 31, 2024, we have not assigned
any value to customer relationship intangibles.
We amortize the value of lease intangibles to expense over the term of the respective leases, which have a weighted-average
useful life of 28.3 years at December 31, 2024. If a lease is terminated early, the unamortized portion of the lease intangible is charged
to expense, as was the case in 2023 with the re-leasing of the Utah properties to CommonSpirit as more fully described in Note 3 to
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities: Investments in entities in which we have the ability to significantly influence (but not
control) are accounted for by the equity method. This includes the five investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures at
December 31, 2024. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses are included in the
“Earnings from equity interests” line of our consolidated statements of net income. Except for our joint venture with Primotop (for
which we handle the accounting of), we have elected to record our share of such investee’s earnings or losses on a lag basis (not to
exceed three months). The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the
interest in the investee entity. Subsequently, our investments are increased/decreased by our share in the investees’ earnings/losses and
decreased by cash distributions from our investees. To the extent that our cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the investee
entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is
included in our share of equity in earnings of the investee.
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the fair value of the equity method
investment to its carrying value, when impairment indicators exist. If we determine a decline in the fair value of an investment in an
unconsolidated investee entity below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded.
Investments in entities in which we do not control nor do we have the ability to significantly influence and for which there is no
readily determinable fair value are accounted for at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price
changes in orderly transactions involving the investee. Cash distributions on these types of investments are recorded to either income
upon receipt (if a return on investment) or as a reduction of our investment (if the distributions received are in excess of our share of
the investee’s earnings). For similar investments but for which there are readily determinable fair values, such investments are
measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in income.
Fair Value Option Election: We elected to account for certain investments using the fair value option method, which means we
mark these investments to fair market value on a recurring basis. At December 31, 2024, the amount of investments recorded using the
fair value option were approximately $266 million made up of loans and equity investments (see Note 10 to Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for additional details). Our loans are recorded at fair value based on Level 2 or Level 3 inputs by discounting the

53
estimated cash flows using the market rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and the same
remaining maturities.
For our equity investment in the international joint venture and our investment in PHP Holdings at December 31, 2024, fair
value is determined based on Level 3 inputs, by using a market approach (for our equity investment in the international joint venture)
and a market approach based on the agreed upon price in the pending transaction (for our investment in PHP Holdings), which
requires significant estimates of our investee such as projected revenue, expenses, and working capital and appropriate consideration
of the underlying risk profile of the forecasted assumptions associated with the investee. We classify our valuations of these
investments as Level 3, as we use certain unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value
measurement, and the valuations require management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices. For the market approach
used for our investment in PHP Holdings, our unobservable inputs include purchase price adjustments related to expected balance
sheet measures at the time of the transaction close, and an adjustment for a marketability discount (“DLOM”). In regard to the
underlying projections used in the discounted cash flow model, such projections are provided by the investees. However, we may
modify such projections as needed based on our review and analysis of historical results, meetings with key members of management,
and our understanding of trends and developments within the healthcare industry. The DLOM on our investment in PHP Holdings was
approximately 14.2% at December 31, 2024. In arriving at the DLOM, we considered many qualitative factors, including the percent
of control, the nature of the underlying investee’s business along with our rights as an investor pursuant to the operating agreement,
the size of investment, expected holding period, number of shareholders, access to capital marketplace, etc. See Note 10 to Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details.
Principles of Consolidation: Property holding entities and other subsidiaries of which we own 100% of the equity or have a
controlling financial interest evidenced by ownership of a majority voting interest are consolidated. All inter-company balances and
transactions are eliminated. For entities in which we own less than 100% of the equity interest, we consolidate the property if we have
the direct or indirect ability to control the entity’s activities based upon the terms of the respective entity's ownership agreements. For
these entities, we record a non-controlling interest representing equity held by non-controlling interests.
We continually evaluate all of our transactions and investments to determine if they represent variable interests in a variable
interest entity. If we determine that we have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, we then evaluate if we are the primary
beneficiary of the variable interest entity. The evaluation is a qualitative assessment as to whether we have the ability to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. We consolidate each variable
interest entity in which we, by virtue of or transactions with our investments in the entity, are considered to be the primary beneficiary.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, we determined that we were not the primary beneficiary of any variable interest entity in which we
hold a variable interest because we do not control the activities (such as the day-to-day operations) that most significantly impact the
economic performance of these entities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our typical sources of cash include our monthly rent and interest receipts, distributions from our real estate joint ventures,
borrowings under our revolving credit facility, public and private issuances of debt, public issuances of our equity securities, and
proceeds from bank debt, asset dispositions (either one-off or group asset sales through joint venture transactions), and principal
payments on loans. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service (including principal and interest), new
investments (including acquisitions, developments, or capital improvement projects), loan advances, property expenses, and general
and administrative expenses.
Absent our requirements to make distributions to maintain our REIT qualification (as described earlier and further described in
Note 5 within Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and our current contractual commitments discussed later in this section, we
do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources.
See below for highlights of our sources and uses of cash for the past two years:
2024 Cash Flow Activity
We generated cash of approximately $245 million from operating activities during 2024, primarily consisting of rent and interest
from mortgage and other loans and distributions from our real estate joint ventures. In addition to operating cash flows, we generated
approximately $1.85 billion from the Utah Transaction and the sale of about 30 properties (as further discussed in Note 3 to Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K), along with approximately $130 million from the sale of our interest in the syndicated Priory term
loan and remaining minority interest in Lifepoint Behavioral. In May 2024, we closed on a new secured term loan, generating
proceeds of approximately $800 million. We used our operating cash flows, asset sale proceeds, and term loan proceeds to fund our
investment activities and our dividends of $321 million, pay down over $1 billion of our revolving credit facility and £207 million (or
$266 million) on our British pound sterling term loan due 2025, and to pay off both our Australian term loan facility of A$470 million
(or $306 million) and our British pound sterling secured term loan due 2024 of £105 million (or $134 million).

54
See below for further details of these transactions along with additional liquidity activity in 2024:
a)
we completed the sales of 11 properties to UCHealth for approximately $86 million of proceeds and eight properties to
Dignity Health for approximately $160 million of proceeds;
b)
we completed the sale of five properties to Prime for cash proceeds of $250 million along with a $100 million interest-
bearing mortgage loan that was fully repaid on August 29, 2024;
c)
we completed the Utah Transaction (as discussed in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) that generated
cash proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion. With the proceeds from these asset sales, we paid off and terminated our
$306 million Australian term loan facility that was due in May 2024 and paid down a portion of our revolving credit
facility;
d)
on May 24, 2024, we closed on a secured loan facility with a consortium of institutional investors for an aggregate
principal amount of approximately £631 million (approximately $800 million) secured by a portfolio of 27 properties
located in the U.K. currently leased to affiliates of Circle. See Note 4 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
further details. We used the majority of the net proceeds of the facility to pay down portions of our revolving credit
facility and British pound sterling term loan due 2025, and to pay off our British pound sterling secured term loan due
2024;
e)
received cash related to our Norwood property that exceeded our recovery receivables (as discussed in Note 3 to Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K);
f)
completed the sale of Watsonville Community Hospital in Watsonville, California in October 2024 for proceeds of
approximately $40 million, and two freestanding emergency department facilities in Texas for approximately $5 million.
In addition, we received approximately $47 million in October 2024 from proceeds generated by the sale of three Space
Coast properties as previously described in “Significant Tenants”;
g)
reduced our dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.08 per share for the last two quarters of the year, which resulted in cash
savings of approximately $40 million per quarter;
h)
reduced revolving commitments under our revolving credit facility from $1.8 billion to $1.28 billion as part of a series of
amendments more fully described below under “Debt Amendments, Restrictions, and Covenant Compliance”;
i)
on November 8, 2024, Astrana Health entered into a binding agreement to purchase the majority of PHP Holdings for
approximately $745 million and the assumption of certain liabilities. After satisfaction of certain obligations, we expect to
receive approximately $150 million in total proceeds. We expect to receive the majority of these proceeds in the first half
of 2025, with the remainder by 2027; and
j)
primarily as a result of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024, not being filed timely,
we are currently ineligible to file a new short-form registration statement on Form S-3 for sales of securities, including
under an ATM program, until June 1, 2025, which may impair our ability to raise capital in the public markets. While we
are able to use other registration avenues for offerings (such as the private notes offering we completed in early 2025 as
discussed below), such avenues are less expeditious and efficient than a shelf registration statement on Form S-3.
Subsequent to December 31, 2024, we repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the British pound sterling term loan due
2025 of £493 million, with a combination of cash on hand and available capacity under our revolving credit facility. In addition, we
completed a private offering of $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032 and €1.0 billion aggregate
principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $2.5 billion after
deducting discounts, commissions, and other offering related expenses. See Note 14 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional details. We used the net proceeds from the offering to fund the redemption of our 3.325% Senior Unsecured Notes due
2025, 2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026, and 5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026, with the remainder of net proceeds
used to paydown our revolving credit facility by approximately $800 million.
2023 Cash Flow Activity
We generated cash of approximately $506 million from operating activities during 2023, primarily consisting of rent and interest
from mortgage and other loans and distributions from our real estate joint ventures. We used these operating cash flows (along with
cash on-hand and borrowings on our revolving credit facility) to fund our dividends of $615 million.

55
In regard to other investing and financing activities in 2023, we did the following:
a)
sold all 11 Australian properties ("Australia Transaction") resulting in proceeds of A$1.2 billion and used such proceeds
to pay down our Australian term loan by A$730 million, with the remaining proceeds used to pay down our revolving
credit facility;
b)
sold three properties to Prime resulting in proceeds of $100 million;
c)
received approximately $500 million of loan principal proceeds, including approximately $200 million from the Lifepoint
Transaction, $100 million from Steward after the completion of their sale of Utah properties to CHIC, CHF 60 million
from the payoff of a loan by Infracore, and approximately $100 million from the sale of our interest in Steward's asset-
backed credit facility to a third-party;
d)
funded approximately $290 million of new investments, including $125 million to Prospect as part of its recapitalization
plan that was implemented on May 23, 2023;
e)
funded approximately $195 million to Steward, including our participation in its syndicated four-year asset-backed credit
facility and loans for general working capital purposes;
f)
paid off our £400 million 2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 (of which we purchased approximately £50 million
before the maturity date at a discount); and
g)
reduced our quarterly dividend per share from $0.29 to $0.15 in the 2023 third quarter, which provided for annual cash
savings of approximately $330 million based on shares outstanding at the time.
Debt Amendments, Restrictions, and Covenant Compliance
Our debt facilities impose certain restrictions on us, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability to: incur debt; create
or incur liens; provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other entity; make redemptions and repurchases of our capital stock;
prepay, redeem, or repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; enter into affiliated transactions; dispose of real estate or
other assets; and change our business. In addition, the credit agreement governing our Credit Facility limits the amount of dividends
we can pay to 95% of NAFFO, as defined in the agreements, on a rolling four quarter basis. The indentures governing our senior
unsecured notes also limit the amount of dividends we can pay based on the sum of 95% of funds from operations, proceeds of equity
issuances, and certain other net cash proceeds. Finally, our senior unsecured notes require us to maintain total unencumbered assets (as
defined in the related indenture) of not less than 150% of our unsecured indebtedness.
In addition to these restrictions, the Credit Facility contains customary financial and operating covenants, along with customary
events of default, including among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, material inaccuracy of representations, and failure to
comply with our covenants. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the facility, the entire outstanding balance may
become immediately due and payable.
On April 12, 2024, we amended the Credit Facility and certain other agreements to (i) reduce revolving commitments from $1.8
billion to $1.4 billion, (ii) apply certain proceeds from asset sales and debt transactions to repay the Australian term loan facility and
certain other outstanding obligations, including revolving loans under the Credit Facility to the extent necessary to reduce the
outstanding borrowings to no more than the amended $1.4 billion commitment, (iii) lower the maximum permitted secured leverage
ratio from 40% to 25%, and (iv) waive the 10% cap on unencumbered asset value attributable to tenants subject to a bankruptcy event
for purposes of determining compliance with the unsecured leverage ratio for the trailing four fiscal quarter period ended June 30,
2024, and for purposes of determining pro forma compliance with the unsecured leverage ratio for certain asset sale and debt
transactions.
On August 6, 2024, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility and the British pound sterling term loan due 2025 to (i)
further reduce our maximum borrowing in the Credit Facility from $1.4 billion to $1.28 billion, (ii) increase borrowing spreads to 300
basis points during the Modified Covenant Period (defined below) and then to 225 basis points after the Modified Covenant Period,
and (iii) require that proceeds of certain future asset sales and debt transactions (during the Modified Covenant Period) be applied to
repay certain outstanding obligations, including our revolving loans (by 15% of such proceeds but for which the revolving loans can
be reborrowed) and our British pound sterling term loan due 2025 (by 50% of such proceeds).
The amendments also amended certain covenants including increasing the maximum total leverage ratio covenant from 60% to
65% and the maximum unsecured leverage ratio covenant from 65% to 70% and decreasing the minimum unsecured interest coverage
ratio from 1.75:1.00 to 1.45:1.00. The amendments were effective as of June 30, 2024 and were to continue in effect through and
including September 30, 2025 (the “Modified Covenant Period”) at which point the credit agreement provided that covenants would
automatically reset to their prior levels. In addition, the amendments permanently reduced the minimum consolidated adjusted net
worth covenant from approximately $6.7 billion to $5 billion, in each case plus the sum of certain equity proceeds. The amendments

56
also limited the payment of dividends in cash during the Modified Covenant Period to $0.08 per share in any fiscal quarter, but the
amendments did not provide any additional restrictions on the payment of dividends outside of the Modified Covenant Period.
On February 13, 2025 and concurrent with the closing of our private notes offering discussed previously, we further amended
the Credit Facility and (i) removed the Modified Covenant Period and any restrictions related thereto from the existing Credit Facility,
which restrictions included additional mandatory prepayments and a restriction on cash dividends to $0.08 per share per fiscal quarter,
(ii) permanently removed financial covenants regarding minimum consolidated tangible net worth, maximum unsecured indebtedness
to unencumbered asset value and minimum unsecured net operating income to unsecured interest expense, (iii) amended certain
definitions used in the financial covenant regarding maximum total indebtedness to total asset value to conform to corresponding
definitions in our existing unsecured indentures and the secured notes issued concurrently and set the covenant level at 60%, (iv)
provided notice that we plan to exercise both of our maturity extension options such that the maturity of the revolving portion of our
Credit Facility would move to June 30, 2027 (subject to the satisfaction of the other conditions), (v) reset the interest rate to SOFR
plus 225 basis points, (vi) provided for the loans thereunder to be secured and guaranteed ratably with the newly issued secured notes,
(vii) set the maximum secured leverage ratio at 40%, and (viii) added mandatory prepayments of senior debt or addition of additional
collateral in connection with any failure to (x) maintain a 65% maximum ratio of secured first lien debt to the undepreciated real estate
value of the secured pool properties or (y) maintain a minimum senior secured debt service coverage ratio of 1.15:1.00 (increasing to
1.30:1.00 in 12 months).
As of December 31, 2024, we are in compliance with all such financial and operating covenants, as amended.
Short-term Liquidity Requirements:
Our short-term liquidity requirements typically consist of general and administrative expenses, dividends in order to comply
with REIT requirements, interest payments on our debt, and planned funding commitments on development and capital improvement
projects for the next twelve months. Our monthly rent and interest receipts and distributions from our joint venture arrangements are
typically enough to cover our short-term liquidity requirements.
As disclosed earlier, on February 13, 2025, we completed a private offering of $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of
senior secured notes due 2032 and €1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032, resulting in total net
proceeds of approximately $2.5 billion, after deducting discounts, commissions, and other offering related expenses. We used these
net proceeds to fund the redemption in full of our 3.325% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025, 2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due
2026, and 5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026. We also used approximately $800 million of net proceeds from this offering to
pay down our Credit Facility, leaving a remaining balance of $104 million at February 28, 2025.
After this offering and the subsequent payoffs of the notes mentioned above, we have no debt maturities coming due in the next
twelve months. In addition, we have liquidity of $1.4 billion (including cash on hand and availability under our $1.28 billion revolving
credit facility) at February 28, 2025. We believe this liquidity along with the expected cash receipts of rent and interest pursuant to our
contractual agreements with our tenants/borrowers is sufficient to fund our short-term liquidity requirements.
Long-term Liquidity Requirements:
Our long-term liquidity requirements generally consist of the same requirements described above under “Short-term Liquidity
Requirements” along with the acquisition of real estate and the funding of debt maturities coming due after the next twelve months. At
this time, we do not expect any material acquisitions of real estate in the foreseeable future.
As described previously, our monthly rent and interest receipts and distributions from our joint venture arrangements along with
our current liquidity of approximately $1.4 billion at February 28, 2025, are typically enough to cover our short-term liquidity
requirements. However, to further improve cash flows and to fund future debt maturities, we may need to look to other sources, which
may include one or a combination of the following:
•
further property sales or joint ventures;
•
monetizing our investments in operators, including our investment in PHP Holdings that is expected to close in the first
half of 2025;
•
reducing our dividend (or moving to a stock dividend), while still complying with REIT requirements and credit facility
covenants;
•
identifying and implementing cost reduction opportunities;
•
entering into new secured loans on real estate;
•
extending the maturity or refinancing our existing Credit Facility and other term loans;

57
•
entering into new bank term loans or issuing new USD, EUR, or GBP denominated debt securities; and
•
sale of equity securities.
However, there is no assurance that conditions will be favorable for such possible transactions or that our plans will be
successful. In addition, the Prospect bankruptcy related proceedings discussed previously may negatively impact the timing, value,
and/or our ability to sell certain Prospect assets, such as the three Connecticut facilities and PHP Holdings.
As a result of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024, not being filed timely, we are currently
ineligible to file a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for sales of securities, including under an ATM program, until June 1,
2025, which may impair our ability to raise capital in the public markets. While we are able to use other registration avenues for
offerings, such avenues can be less expeditious and efficient than a shelf registration statement on Form S-3.
Contractual Commitments
The following table summarizes known material contractual commitments including debt service commitments (principal and
interest payments) as of February 28, 2025 and includes the secured notes offering closed on February 13, 2025 and related use of
funds discussed previously (amounts in thousands):
Commitments (1)
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Thereafter
Total
Senior unsecured notes(2)... $
184,182
$
723,744
$ 1,599,843
$
884,463
$ 1,001,982
$
1,823,302
$
6,217,516
Senior secured notes ...........
100,162
200,125
200,125
200,125
200,025
3,038,111
3,938,673
Revolving credit facility(3).
7,375
108,136
—
—
—
—
115,511
Term loan............................
11,343
13,533
206,711
—
—
—
231,587
British pound secured loan
facility ..............................
40,845
54,609
54,609
54,759
54,609
1,039,753
1,299,184
Operating lease
commitments(4)...............
6,518
8,139
7,334
6,734
6,789
185,887
221,401
Purchase obligations(5).......
190,179
21,356
—
—
—
—
211,535
Totals................................... $
540,604
$ 1,129,642
$ 2,068,622
$ 1,146,081
$ 1,263,405
$
6,087,053
$ 12,235,407
(1)
We used the exchange rates at February 28, 2025 in preparing this table. For any variable rate debt, we have assumed that the
interest rate in effect at February 28, 2025 remains in effect through maturity.
(2)
No debt principal maturities until October 15, 2026 for €500 million.
(3)
As of February 28, 2025, we have a $1.28 billion revolving credit facility. This table assumes the balance outstanding under the
revolver (which was $104 million as of February 28, 2025) remains in effect through maturity, which currently is June 30, 2026
but can be extended by one year at our election, which we noticed the lenders of our plan to extend as part of our February 13,
2025 Credit Facility amendment.
(4)
Much of our contractual obligations to make operating lease payments are related to ground leases for which we are reimbursed
by our tenants along with corporate office and equipment leases.
(5)
Includes approximately $40 million of future expenditures related to development projects and $76 million of future
expenditures on committed capital improvement projects.
Results of Operations
Our operating results may vary significantly from year-to-year due to a variety of reasons including acquisitions made during
the year, incremental revenues and expenses from acquisitions made in the prior year, revenues and expenses from completed
development properties, property disposals, annual escalation provisions, interest rate changes, foreign currency exchange rate
changes, new or amended debt agreements, issuances of shares through an equity offering, impact from accounting changes, lease
terminations/re-tenanting, etc. Thus, our operating results for the current year are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected in future years.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2023
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $(2.4) billion ($(4.02) per share) compared to net loss of $(556.5) million
($(0.93) per share) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The net loss for both years was primarily related to loss of rent along with

58
impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments on our investments in Steward and Prospect. The additional net loss in 2024 is
primarily driven by the approximate $2.2 billion of impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments in 2024 related to
Steward, Prospect, and the international joint venture, compared to the more than $700 million of impairment charges on Steward
investments in 2023, as further described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K. In addition, we had an approximate $550 million unfavorable fair value adjustment to our investment in PHP Holdings in 2024
along with lower revenues from Steward and property sales. In 2023, we recognized a $161 million tax benefit related to entering the
U.K. REIT regime (as more fully described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K), with no similar benefit in 2024. These changes were partially offset by approximately $479 million of gains on real estate sales
in 2024 along with lower real estate depreciation due to these sales. Normalized FFO, after adjusting for certain items (as more fully
described in the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), was $483 million
for 2024, or $0.80 per share, as compared to $951 million, or $1.59 per share, for 2023. This 49% decrease in Normalized FFO is
primarily due to lower revenues from Steward and from the various disposals in 2023 and 2024.
A comparison of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
2024
2023
Change
Rent billed............................................................ $
719,749
72.3% $
803,375
92.2%
$
(83,626)
Straight-line rent..................................................
163,414
16.4%
(127,894)
(14.7)%
291,308
Income from financing leases..............................
63,651
6.4%
127,141
14.6%
(63,490)
Interest and other income ....................................
48,733
4.9%
69,177
7.9%
(20,444)
Total revenues...................................................... $
995,547
100.0% $
871,799
100.0%
$
123,748
Our total revenues for 2024 increased by $123.7 million or 14% over the prior year. This change is made up of the following:
•
Operating lease revenue (includes rent billed and straight-line rent) — up $207.7 million from the prior year. Compared
to 2023, we realized $14 million of incremental operating lease revenue from acquisitions in 2023 and the completion of
capital addition and development projects, including the commencement of rent on two development properties in 2024.
With the re-leasing of former Steward properties post the global settlement in the 2024 third quarter, we recorded
approximately $10 million of revenue in the year. In addition, our 2024 operating lease revenues were benefited by $22
million from increases in CPI above the contractual minimum escalations in our leases and $9 million from favorable
foreign currency fluctuations.
However, with our strategy to improve our liquidity position and reduce near-term maturities, we did have significant
property sales in 2023 and 2024. These disposals resulted in a loss of operating lease revenue in 2024 compared to 2023
of approximately $173 million.
Finally, our operating lease revenues were significantly impacted by Steward in both 2024 and 2023 as detailed below:
a)
with Steward’s sale of its Utah operations to CommonSpirit in May 2023, this effectively canceled the old lease
with Steward resulting in approximately $95 million of write-offs of straight-line rent receivables in 2023;
b)
with Steward’s operational and liquidity challenges surfacing in late 2023, we moved to the cash basis of
accounting in December 2023, which resulted in approximately $400 million of reserves against unpaid rent and
straight-line rent receivables which more than offset the roughly $200 million of revenue previously recorded in
2023; and
c)
in 2024, we received approximately $40 million in cash rent and this was reflected as revenue in the year.
See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more details
regarding the activity above.
•
Income from financing leases — down $63.5 million primarily due to receiving cash of approximately $25 million for
rent revenue from Prospect (cash basis tenant) in 2024, whereas we recorded $82 million of rent for this tenant in 2023.
In addition, financing lease income was lower by $7.5 million from the disposal of three Prime financing leases in the
third quarter of 2023. These decreases were partially offset by approximately $1 million from the increase in CPI above
the lease contractual minimum escalations.
•
Interest and other income — down $20.5 million from the prior year due to the following:

Interest from loans — down $4.9 million, primarily due to an approximate $16.9 million decrease from loan
payoffs in 2024 and 2023 (including $12.8 million from the sale of our interest in the Priory syndicated term
loan in the first quarter of 2024) and approximately $10.5 million more interest revenue in 2023 compared to
the same period of 2024 as a result of the Prospect Transaction as described in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

59
These decreases are partially offset by approximately $16 million of net reserves recorded in 2023 related to
interest receivables from Steward and our international joint venture (as the $81 million of write-offs in the
2023 fourth quarter exceeded the amount of revenue recorded in the year), approximately $4 million of interest
income from the Prime mortgage loan we received as a result of the Prime disposal (as further described in Note
3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K including the
repayment on August 29, 2024), approximately $1 million of higher income from annual escalations due to
increases in CPI, approximately $0.8 million from loans made to new operators of the former Steward facilities,
and approximately $1 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations.

Other income — down $15.6 million from the prior year as we had less direct reimbursements from our cash
basis tenants (such as Steward) for ground leases, property taxes, and insurance.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for 2024 and 2023 totaled $417.8 million and $411.2 million, respectively. This increase is primarily related to
additional interest from our British pound sterling secured term loan due 2034 that closed in May 2024 and an increase in our specific
interest rates due to a credit rating adjustment in March 2023 and our Credit Facility amendment on August 6, 2024. Overall, our
weighted-average interest rate was 4.3% for 2024, compared to 3.9% for 2023.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
Real estate depreciation and amortization during 2024 decreased to $447.7 million from $603.4 million in 2023 due to
accelerating the amortization of lease intangibles as part of the sale of hospital operations by Steward and re-leasing of the five Utah
facilities to CommonSpirit in May 2023 (approximately $286 million) and the sale of various properties in 2024 and 2023. This
decrease is partially offset by approximately $170 million of additional amortization expense recorded in 2024 primarily to fully
amortize the intangibles associated with two master leases, including the Steward master lease that was terminated effective
September 11, 2024.
Property-related
Property-related expenses for 2024 decreased to $27.3 million, compared to $41.6 million in 2023. Of the property expenses in
2024 and 2023, approximately $14 million and $29 million, respectively, represents costs (primarily property taxes and insurance
premiums) that were reimbursed by our tenants and included in the “Interest and other income” line on our consolidated statements of
net income. The remaining non-reimbursed property expenses are consistent year over year and include expenses incurred at our
vacant facilities along with costs incurred to manage our portfolio, including physical inspections.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses decreased to $133.8 million in 2024 compared to $145.6 million in 2023 due to various
lower corporate costs including travel costs. For 2024, general and administrative expenses included $33.0 million of stock
compensation expense (slightly lower than 2023), of which $4.6 million related to certain 2024 stock grants with cash-settled features
that are marked to fair value quarterly.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
During 2024, the gain on sale of real estate of $478.7 million primarily related to the disposal of five Prime facilities, the sale of
a 75% interest in five Utah facilities as part of the Utah Transaction, and the sale of eight Dignity Health facilities and 11 UCHealth
facilities as more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
did not have any significant gain/loss on property sales in 2023.
Real Estate and Other Impairment Charges, Net
In 2024, we recognized $1.8 billion of real estate and other impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments, primarily
associated with our investments in Steward, Prospect, and the international joint venture (including approximately $18 million related
to our investment in three hospitals in Colombia) as further described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In 2023, we recorded $376.9 million of impairment charges, of which $271 million related to our
Steward properties, $86 million related to the Australia Transaction, and $11 million was a non-cash impairment charge on the three
Prime properties sold.

60
(Loss) Earnings from Equity Interests
Loss from equity interests was ($366.6) million for 2024, compared to $14 million of earnings for 2023, primarily due to the
$410 million charge in the second quarter of 2024 associated with the real estate impairment in our Massachusetts-based partnership
with Macquarie as further described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This was partially offset by our share of income on our new Utah partnership as a result of the Utah Transaction in the second quarter
of 2024. In 2023, we recorded a $30 million reserve of billed and straight-line rent on Steward leased properties that are included in
our Massachusetts-based partnership with Macquarie (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for further details).
Debt Refinancing and Unutilized Financing (Costs) Benefit
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs were $4.3 million for 2024. These costs were incurred as a result of the
reduction in revolving commitments under our Credit Facility and partial paydown of our British pound sterling term loan due 2025,
both of which are described in more detail in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We had a debt refinancing and unutilized financing net benefit in 2023 of $0.3 million including a $1.1 million benefit related to
the purchase of £50 million of our 2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 at a discounted price, partially offset by $0.8 million of
costs associated with the partial prepayment of our A$1.2 billion Australian term loan in the second quarter of 2023.
Other (Including Fair Value Adjustments on Securities)
Other expense for 2024 was $615.6 million, compared to $7.6 million of income in the prior year. For 2024, we recognized an
approximate $550 million unfavorable fair value adjustments to our investment in PHP Holdings. In addition, we incurred a $7.8
million economic loss from the sale of our interest in the Priory syndicated term loan and approximately $51.3 million of legal and
other professional expenses associated with the Steward bankruptcy and responding to certain defamatory statements published by
certain parties, among other things. For 2023, we had an approximate $45 million favorable non-cash fair value adjustment on our
investment in PHP Holdings and a CHF 20 million (approximately $22 million) unrealized gain on our equity investment in Swiss
Medical Network, partially offset by unfavorable non-cash fair value adjustments on other investments marked to fair value in 2023
and approximately $16 million of expenses associated with responding to certain defamatory statements previously mentioned.
Income Tax
Income tax expense includes U.S. federal and state income taxes on our TRS entities, as well as non-U.S. income based or
withholding taxes on certain investments located in jurisdictions outside the U.S. The $44.1 million income tax expense for 2024 is
primarily based on the income generated by our investments in the U.K. and Germany, and included $5 million of additional tax
expense in the second quarter of 2024 as a result of the gain on the interest rate swap associated with the internal restructuring of the
British pound sterling term loan due 2025. In comparison, we had a $130.7 million income tax benefit in 2023 that was primarily
based on the $161 million benefit received by entering the U.K. REIT regime effective July 1, 2023 and a $5.0 million tax benefit
recognized in the first quarter of 2023 related to the sale of our Australia facilities. For more detailed information, see Note 5 to Item 8
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent we
believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, all available positive and negative evidence is
considered, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and
recent financial performance. Based upon our review of all positive and negative evidence, including our three-year cumulative pre-
tax book loss position in certain entities, we concluded that a valuation allowance of approximately $419 million should be reflected
against certain of our international and domestic net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2024. In the future, if we determine that it is
more likely than not that we will realize our net deferred tax assets, we will reverse the applicable portion of the valuation allowance,
recognize an income tax benefit in the period in which such determination is made, and potentially incur higher income tax expense in
future periods as income is earned. For more detailed information, see Note 5 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We consider non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP
financial measure is a measure of financial performance, financial position, or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are
not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to supplement our evaluation of operating performance
and that we consider useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP
measures.

61
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
Investors and analysts following the real estate industry utilize funds from operations, or FFO, as a supplemental performance
measure. FFO, reflecting the assumption that real estate asset values rise or fall with market conditions, principally adjusts for the
effects of GAAP depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably
over time. We compute FFO in accordance with the definition provided by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts,
or Nareit, which represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate
and impairment charges on real estate assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, including amortization related to in-place
lease intangibles, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
In addition to presenting FFO in accordance with the Nareit definition, we disclose normalized FFO, which adjusts FFO for
items that relate to unanticipated or non-core events or activities or accounting changes that, if not noted, would make comparison to
prior period results and market expectations less meaningful to investors and analysts.
We believe that the use of FFO, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of our operating
results among investors and the use of normalized FFO makes comparisons of our operating results with prior periods and other
companies more meaningful. While FFO and normalized FFO are relevant and widely used supplemental measures of operating and
financial performance of REITs, they should not be viewed as a substitute measure of our operating performance since the measures
do not reflect either depreciation and amortization costs or the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs (if any are not paid by
our tenants) to maintain the operating performance of our properties, which can be significant economic costs that could materially
impact our results of operations. FFO and normalized FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in
accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance
with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss attributable to MPT common stockholders to FFO and Normalized FFO
for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands except per share data):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
FFO Information
Net loss attributable to MPT common stockholders............................................
$
(2,410,271)
$
(556,476)
Participating securities’ share in earnings............................................................
(946)
(1,644)
Net loss, less participating securities’ share in earnings..................................
$
(2,411,217)
$
(558,120)
Depreciation and amortization.............................................................................
509,524
676,132
(Gain) loss on sale of real estate ..........................................................................
(478,693)
1,815
Real estate impairment charges............................................................................
980,263
167,966
Funds from operations .....................................................................................
$
(1,400,123)
$
287,793
Write-off of billed and unbilled rent and other....................................................
2,514
649,911
Other impairment charges....................................................................................
1,255,929
208,941
Litigation and other..............................................................................................
51,308
15,886
Share-based compensation adjustments...............................................................
—
(9,691)
Non-cash fair value adjustments..........................................................................
563,666
(34,157)
Tax rate changes and other...................................................................................
5,119
(167,332)
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs (benefit)...................................
4,292
(285)
Normalized funds from operations ..................................................................
$
482,705
$
951,066
Per diluted share data
Net loss, less participating securities’ share in earnings......................................
$
(4.02)
$
(0.93)
Depreciation and amortization.............................................................................
0.86
1.13
(Gain) loss on sale of real estate ..........................................................................
(0.80)
—
Real estate impairment charges............................................................................
1.63
0.28
Funds from operations .....................................................................................
$
(2.33)
$
0.48
Write-off of billed and unbilled rent and other....................................................
—
1.09
Other impairment charges....................................................................................
2.08
0.35
Litigation and other..............................................................................................
0.09
0.03
Share-based compensation adjustments...............................................................
—
(0.02)
Non-cash fair value adjustments..........................................................................
0.94
(0.06)
Tax rate changes and other...................................................................................
0.01
(0.28)
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs (benefit)...................................
0.01
—
Normalized funds from operations ..................................................................
$
0.80
$
1.59

62
Distribution Policy
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year that began on April 6, 2004 and ended on December
31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that
we distribute (in the form of cash or stock) at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders.
It is our current intention to comply with these requirements and maintain such status going forward.
The table below is a summary of our distributions declared (and paid in cash) during the three year period ended December 31,
2024:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Date of Distribution
Distribution per Share
November 21, 2024......................
December 12, 2024
January 9, 2025
$
0.08
August 22, 2024 ...........................
September 9, 2024
October 10, 2024
$
0.08
May 30, 2024 ...............................
June 10, 2024
July 9, 2024
$
0.15
April 12, 2024 ..............................
April 22, 2024
May 1, 2024
$
0.15
November 9, 2023........................
December 7, 2023
January 11, 2024
$
0.15
August 21, 2023 ...........................
September 14, 2023
October 12, 2023
$
0.15
April 27, 2023 ..............................
June 15, 2023
July 13, 2023
$
0.29
February 16, 2023 ........................
March 16, 2023
April 13, 2023
$
0.29
November 10, 2022......................
December 8, 2022
January 12, 2023
$
0.29
August 18, 2022 ...........................
September 15, 2022
October 13, 2022
$
0.29
May 26, 2022 ...............................
June 16, 2022
July 14, 2022
$
0.29
February 17, 2022 ........................
March 17, 2022
April 14, 2022
$
0.29
On February 13, 2025, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share
of common stock to be paid on April 10, 2025, to shareholders of record on March 10, 2025.
We intend to pay to our stockholders, within the time periods prescribed by the Code, all or substantially all of our annual
taxable income, including taxable gains from the sale of real estate and recognized gains on the sale of securities. It is our policy to
make sufficient distributions to stockholders in order for us to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and to efficiently manage
corporate income and excise taxes on undistributed income, although there is no assurance as to further dividends because they depend
on future earnings, capital requirements, and our financial condition. Although we have only made cash distributions historically, we
may consider making stock dividends in the future for liquidity purposes, while still complying with REIT requirements. In addition,
our Credit Facility limits the amount of cash dividends we can make — see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity
prices, and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We seek to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest
rates by matching the terms of new investments with new long-term fixed rate borrowings to the extent possible. We may or may not
elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate or foreign currency exposure. For interest rate hedging, these
decisions are principally based on our policy to match investments with comparable borrowings, but are also based on the general
trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates. For foreign currency hedging,
these decisions are principally based on how our investments are financed, the long-term nature of our investments, the need to
repatriate earnings back to the U.S., and the general trend in foreign currency exchange rates.
In addition, the value of our facilities will be subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions
and changes in the ability of our tenants to generate profits.
Our primary exposure to market risks relates to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency. The following analyses
present the sensitivity of the market value, earnings, and cash flows of our significant financial instruments to hypothetical changes in
interest rates and exchange rates as if these changes had occurred. The hypothetical changes chosen for these analyses reflect our view
of changes that are reasonably possible over a one-year period. These forward looking disclosures are selective in nature and only
address the potential impact from these hypothetical changes. They do not include other potential effects which could impact our
business as a result of changes in market conditions. In addition, they do not include measures we may take to minimize our exposure
such as entering into future interest rate swaps to hedge against interest rate increases on our variable rate debt.

63
Interest Rate Sensitivity
For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact net income to common stockholders or
cash flows. Conversely, for floating rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact net
income to common stockholders and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. At December 31, 2024, our outstanding
debt totaled $8.9 billion, which consisted of fixed-rate debt of approximately $8.3 billion (after considering interest rate swaps in-
place) and variable rate debt of $0.6 billion. If market interest rates increase by 10%, the fair value of our debt at December 31, 2024
(excluding the three senior unsecured notes paid off in 2025 with the new senior secured notes offering as discussed in Item 7 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K) would decrease by approximately $200.8 million. Changes in the fair value of our fixed rate debt will
not have any impact on us unless we decided to repurchase the debt in the open market.
If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 10%, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate
debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by $3.7 million per year. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt
decrease by 10%, the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by $3.7
million per year. This assumes that the average amount outstanding under our variable rate debt for a year is $0.6 billion, the balance
of such variable rate debt at December 31, 2024.
Foreign Currency Sensitivity
With our investments in the U.K., Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Finland, and Colombia, we are subject to
fluctuations in the British pound, euro, Swiss franc, and Colombian peso to U.S. dollar currency exchange rates. Although we
generally deem investments in these countries to be of a long-term nature, are typically able to match any non-U.S. dollar borrowings
with investments in such currencies, and historically have not needed to repatriate a material amount of earnings back to the U.S.,
increases or decreases in the value of the respective non-U.S. dollar currencies to U.S. dollar exchange rates may impact our financial
condition and/or our results of operations. Based solely on our 2024 operating results, a 10% change to the following exchange rates
would have impacted our net income, FFO, and Normalized FFO by the amounts below (in thousands):
Net Income Impact
FFO Impact
NFFO Impact
British pound (£).......................................................... $
9,093
$
18,948
$
19,675
Euro (€)........................................................................
1,293
5,927
5,785
Swiss franc (CHF) .......................................................
220
2,396
3,252
Colombian peso (COP)................................................
1,849
174
263

64
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”)
as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of net income, of comprehensive (loss) income, of equity
and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, including the related notes and financial
statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).
We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We
are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.

65
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or
disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or
complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the
critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment Assessment of Real Estate Investments
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company’s real estate investments
was $9.8 billion as of December 31, 2024, including land, buildings and improvements net of accumulated depreciation and intangible
assets net of accumulated amortization. Management reviews real estate investments for impairment when events and circumstances
indicate that the assets may not be recoverable. Management analyzes recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the real
estate assets to a probability-weighted set of estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by those assets, including an estimated
liquidation amount, during the expected holding periods. Assumptions used in determining undiscounted cash flows may include, but
are not limited to, market rental rates, capitalization rates, and holding periods. If the recoverability analysis indicates that the carrying
value of the real estate asset is greater than the expected future undiscounted cash flows, impairment losses are measured as the
difference between carrying value and fair value of the assets. Future cash flows are discounted when determining fair value of an
asset. Estimated future cash flows used in such analysis are based on the Company’s plans for the real estate asset and their view of
market economic conditions. Assumptions used in determining fair value may include, but are not limited to, market rental rates,
discount rates, and capitalization rates.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of real estate
investments is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the undiscounted cash flows to
be generated by the assets, and developing the fair value estimate, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in
performing procedures related to evaluating management’s undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets and significant
assumptions related to market rental rates and the holding period used in developing the undiscounted cash flows, and the market
rental rates, capitalization rates, and discount rate used in the fair value estimate, and (iii) the audit effort for certain real estate
investments involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion
on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s
impairment assessment, including controls over the development of the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets and fair
value estimate. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for developing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows and for developing the fair value used in the impairment assessment of real estate investments, (ii) evaluating
the appropriateness of the undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows models, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of
underlying data used in the models, and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related
to the market rental rates and holding period used in the undiscounted cash flow model and the market rental rates, capitalization rates
and discount rate used in the discounted cash flow model. Evaluating management's assumptions related to market rental rates,
capitalization rates, discount rate and holding period involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were
reasonable considering the consistency with external market data and comparable transactions. For certain real estate investments,
professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions related to
market rental rates, capitalization rates and discount rate.
Allowance for Credit Losses and Fair Value Adjustments related to one of the Company's Underlying Operators
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an asset-backed loan, a mortgage loan
secured by four properties and leases real estate assets to an operator, and a non-controlling interest in the operator’s managed care
business. The operator filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 11, 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2024 approximately $400 million
of impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments were recorded associated with these investments. This charge is in addition
to the approximately $498 million of negative fair value adjustments that were made through the first nine months of 2024. As of
December 31, 2024, the total amount of the investments relating to the operator and its managed care business was approximately
$835 million, which the Company may not be able to recover or preserve. In determining the impairment charges needed for these

66
investments, management compared the carrying value of such investments to the fair value of the operator’s underlying collateral
(which includes real estate assets) less cost to sell, and factored in the priority of claims associated with the bankruptcy. In estimating
the fair value of the real estate, management used a combination of cost, market and income approaches using Level 3 inputs. The cost
approach used comparable sales to value the land and cost manuals to value the improvements. The value derived from the market
approach was based on sale prices of similar properties. For the income approach, management divided the expected operating income
for the property by a market capitalization rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for credit losses and fair value
adjustments related to one of the Company's underlying operators is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by
management when developing the fair value estimates of the operator’s underlying collateral, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment,
subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the market
capitalization rates and the expected operating income of the underlying collateral, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of
professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion
on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s
expected credit losses and fair value adjustment processes, including controls over the development of the fair value estimates. These
procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for determining the fair value of the underlying collateral,
(ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the models used by management, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data
used in the models, and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to the market
capitalization rates and the expected operating income. Evaluating management's assumptions related to expected operating income
and market capitalization involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering the
consistency with external market data and comparable transactions. For certain real estate assets, professionals with specialized skill
and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions related to market capitalization rate and
expected operating income.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 3, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

67
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.:
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of net income, of comprehensive (loss)
income, of capital and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, including the related notes and
financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial
statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We
are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

68
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures
that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements,
taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit
matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment Assessment of Real Estate Investments
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company’s real estate investments
was $9.8 billion as of December 31, 2024, including land, buildings and improvements net of accumulated depreciation and intangible
assets net of accumulated amortization. Management reviews real estate investments for impairment when events and circumstances
indicate that the assets may not be recoverable. Management analyzes recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the real
estate assets to a probability-weighted set of estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by those assets, including an estimated
liquidation amount, during the expected holding periods. Assumptions used in determining undiscounted cash flows may include, but
are not limited to, market rental rates, capitalization rates, and holding periods. If the recoverability analysis indicates that the carrying
value of the real estate asset is greater than the expected future undiscounted cash flows, impairment losses are measured as the
difference between carrying value and fair value of the assets. Future cash flows are discounted when determining fair value of an
asset. Estimated future cash flows used in such analysis are based on the Company’s plans for the real estate asset and their view of
market economic conditions. Assumptions used in determining fair value may include, but are not limited to, market rental rates,
discount rates, and capitalization rates.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of real estate
investments is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the undiscounted cash flows to
be generated by the assets, and developing the fair value estimate, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in
performing procedures related to evaluating management’s undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets and significant
assumptions related to market rental rates and the holding period used in developing the undiscounted cash flows, and the market
rental rates, capitalization rates, and discount rate used in the fair value estimate, and (iii) the audit effort for certain real estate
investments involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion
on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s
impairment assessment, including controls over the development of the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets and fair
value estimate. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for developing the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows and for developing the fair value used in the impairment assessment of real estate investments, (ii) evaluating
the appropriateness of the undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows models, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of
underlying data used in the models, and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related
to the market rental rates and holding period used in the undiscounted cash flow model and the market rental rates, capitalization rates
and discount rate used in the discounted cash flow model. Evaluating management's assumptions related to market rental rates,
capitalization rates, discount rate and holding period involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were
reasonable considering the consistency with external market data and comparable transactions. For certain real estate investments,
professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions related to
market rental rates, capitalization rates and discount rate.
Allowance for Credit Losses and Fair Value Adjustments related to one of the Company's Underlying Operators
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an asset-backed loan, a mortgage loan
secured by four properties and leases real estate assets to an operator, and a non-controlling interest in the operator’s managed care
business. The operator filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 11, 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2024 approximately $400 million
of impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments were recorded associated with these investments. This charge is in addition
to the approximately $498 million of negative fair value adjustments that were made through the first nine months of 2024. As of
December 31, 2024, the total amount of the investments relating to the operator and its managed care business was approximately
$835 million, which the Company may not be able to recover or preserve. In determining the impairment charges needed for these
investments, management compared the carrying value of such investments to the fair value of the operator’s underlying collateral
(which includes real estate assets) less cost to sell, and factored in the priority of claims associated with the bankruptcy. In estimating
the fair value of the real estate, management used a combination of cost, market and income approaches using Level 3 inputs. The cost
approach used comparable sales to value the land and cost manuals to value the improvements. The value derived from the market

69
approach was based on sale prices of similar properties. For the income approach, management divided the expected operating income
for the property by a market capitalization rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for credit losses and fair value
adjustments related to one of the Company's underlying operators is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by
management when developing the fair value estimates of the operator’s underlying collateral, (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment,
subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the market
capitalization rates and the expected operating income of the underlying collateral, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of
professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion
on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s
expected credit losses and fair value adjustment processes, including controls over the development of the fair value estimates. These
procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for determining the fair value of the underlying collateral,
(ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the models used by management, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data
used in the models, and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to the market
capitalization rates and the expected operating income. Evaluating management's assumptions related to expected operating income
and market capitalization involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering the
consistency with external market data and comparable transactions. For certain real estate assets, professionals with specialized skill
and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions related to market capitalization rate and
expected operating income.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 3, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

70
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2024
2023
(Amounts in thousands,
except for per share data)
ASSETS
Real estate assets
Land.............................................................................................................................................
$
1,607,869
$
1,806,765
Buildings and improvements.......................................................................................................
8,847,892
10,395,612
Intangible lease assets..................................................................................................................
804,081
1,034,810
Investment in financing leases.....................................................................................................
1,057,770
1,231,630
Real estate held for sale...............................................................................................................
34,019
—
Mortgage loans ............................................................................................................................
119,912
309,315
Gross investment in real estate assets......................................................................................
12,471,543
14,778,132
Accumulated depreciation ...........................................................................................................
(1,221,644)
(1,227,619)
Accumulated amortization...........................................................................................................
(201,304)
(180,352)
Net investment in real estate assets .........................................................................................
11,048,595
13,370,161
Cash and cash equivalents .................................................................................................................
332,335
250,016
Interest and rent receivables ..............................................................................................................
36,327
45,059
Straight-line rent receivables.............................................................................................................
700,783
635,987
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures...................................................................
1,156,397
1,474,455
Investments in unconsolidated operating entities..............................................................................
439,578
1,778,640
Other loans.........................................................................................................................................
109,175
292,615
Other assets........................................................................................................................................
471,404
457,911
Total Assets ......................................................................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Debt, net.........................................................................................................................................
$
8,848,112
$
10,064,236
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.......................................................................................
454,209
412,178
Deferred revenue ...........................................................................................................................
29,445
37,962
Obligations to tenants and other lease liabilities ...........................................................................
129,045
156,603
Total Liabilities........................................................................................................................
9,460,811
10,670,979
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized 10,000 shares; no shares outstanding ..................
—
—
Common stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized 750,000 shares; issued and outstanding —
600,403 shares at December 31, 2024 and 598,991 shares at December 31, 2023....................
600
599
Additional paid-in capital ..............................................................................................................
8,584,917
8,560,309
Retained deficit..............................................................................................................................
(3,658,516)
(971,809)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.........................................................................
(94,272)
42,501
Total Medical Properties Trust, Inc. stockholders’ equity ................................................................
4,832,729
7,631,600
Non-controlling interests ...................................................................................................................
1,054
2,265
Total Equity .............................................................................................................................
4,833,783
7,633,865
Total Liabilities and Equity............................................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

71
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Net Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Amounts in thousands,
except for per share data)
Revenues
Rent billed.................................................................................................................
$
719,749
$
803,375
$
968,874
Straight-line rent .......................................................................................................
163,414
(127,894)
204,159
Income from financing leases...................................................................................
63,651
127,141
203,580
Interest and other income..........................................................................................
48,733
69,177
166,238
Total revenues.......................................................................................................
995,547
871,799
1,542,851
Expenses
Interest.......................................................................................................................
417,824
411,171
359,036
Real estate depreciation and amortization ................................................................
447,657
603,360
332,977
Property-related.........................................................................................................
27,255
41,567
45,697
General and administrative .......................................................................................
133,789
145,588
160,494
Total expenses.......................................................................................................
1,026,525
1,201,686
898,204
Other (expense) income
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate ...............................................................................
478,693
(1,815)
536,755
Real estate and other impairment charges, net..........................................................
(1,825,402)
(376,907)
(268,375)
(Loss) earnings from equity interests........................................................................
(366,642)
13,967
40,800
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing (costs) benefit........................................
(4,292)
285
(9,452)
Other (including fair value adjustments on securities) .............................................
(615,565)
7,586
15,344
Total other (expense) income................................................................................
(2,333,208)
(356,884)
315,072
(Loss) income before income tax ...............................................................................
(2,364,186)
(686,771)
959,719
Income tax (expense) benefit....................................................................................
(44,101)
130,679
(55,900)
Net (loss) income .....................................................................................................
(2,408,287)
(556,092)
903,819
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests ................................................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Net (loss) income attributable to MPT common stockholders................................
$ (2,410,271)
$
(556,476)
$
902,597
Earnings per common share — basic and diluted
Net (loss) income attributable to MPT common stockholders............................
$
(4.02)
$
(0.93)
$
1.50
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic....................................................
600,248
598,518
598,634
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted.................................................
600,248
598,518
598,837
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

72
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Net (loss) income..........................................................................................................
$ (2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate hedges, net of tax.........................................
(20,779)
(34,932)
100,550
Reclassification of interest rate hedges gain from AOCI to
earnings, net of tax.................................................................................................
(18,926)
(28,553)
—
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain ...................................................................
(97,068)
162,680
(123,007)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation loss from
AOCI to earnings...................................................................................................
—
2,490
—
Total comprehensive (loss) income..............................................................................
(2,545,060)
(454,407)
881,362
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests.............................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to MPT common stockholders..................
$ (2,547,044)
$
(454,791)
$
880,140
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Preferred
Common
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Shares
Par
Value
Shares
Par
Value
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
(Deficit)
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2021 ...................................................
—
$
—
596,748
$
597
$ 8,564,009
$
(87,691)
$
(36,727)
$
5,483
$
8,445,671
Net income............................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
902,597
—
1,222
903,819
Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges, net of tax ..............................
—
—
—
—
—
—
100,550
—
100,550
Foreign currency translation loss ..................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(123,007)
—
(123,007)
Stock vesting and amortization of stock-based compensation.................
—
—
3,675
3
49,418
—
—
—
49,421
Stock vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings .................................
—
—
(1,302)
(1)
(29,921)
—
—
—
(29,922)
Repurchase of common stock ......................................................
—
—
(1,645)
(2)
(17,938)
—
—
—
(17,940)
Acquisition of non-controlling interest............................................
—
—
—
—
(30,428)
—
—
(4,594)
(35,022)
Issuance of non-controlling interests..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,054
1,054
Distributions to non-controlling interests.........................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,596)
(1,596)
Dividends declared ($1.16 per common share) ..................................
—
—
—
—
—
(698,621)
—
—
(698,621)
Balance at December 31, 2022 ...................................................
—
$
—
597,476
$
597
$ 8,535,140
$
116,285
$
(59,184)
$
1,569
$
8,594,407
Net (loss) income ....................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
(556,476)
—
384
(556,092)
Unrealized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax...............................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(34,932)
—
(34,932)
Reclassification of interest rate hedge gain to
earnings, net of tax.................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(28,553)
—
(28,553)
Foreign currency translation gain..................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
162,680
—
162,680
Reclassification of foreign currency translation
loss to earnings.....................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,490
—
2,490
Stock vesting and amortization of stock-based compensation.................
—
—
2,457
2
33,248
—
—
—
33,250
Stock vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings .................................
—
—
(942)
—
(8,079)
—
—
—
(8,079)
Issuance of non-controlling interests..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,375
1,375
Distributions to non-controlling interests.........................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,063)
(1,063)
Dividends declared ($0.88 per common share) ..................................
—
—
—
—
—
(531,618)
—
—
(531,618)
Balance at December 31, 2023 ...................................................
—
$
—
598,991
$
599
$ 8,560,309
$
(971,809)
$
42,501
$
2,265
$
7,633,865
Net (loss) income ....................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
(2,410,271)
—
1,984
(2,408,287)
Unrealized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax...............................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(20,779)
—
(20,779)
Reclassification of interest rate hedge gain to
earnings, net of tax.................................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(18,926)
—
(18,926)
Foreign currency translation loss ..................................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
(97,068)
—
(97,068)
Stock vesting and amortization of stock-based compensation.................
—
—
2,173
2
28,412
—
—
—
28,414
Stock vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings .................................
—
—
(761)
(1)
(3,804)
—
—
—
(3,805)
Acquisitions of non-controlling interests .........................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,500)
(1,500)
Distributions to non-controlling interests.........................................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,695)
(1,695)
Dividends declared ($0.46 per common share) ..................................
—
—
—
—
—
(276,436)
—
—
(276,436)
Balance at December 31, 2024 ...................................................
—
$
—
600,403
$
600
$ 8,584,917
$ (3,658,516)
$
(94,272)
$
1,054
$
4,833,783
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
73

74
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Amounts in thousands)
Operating activities
Net (loss) income .......................................................................................................................
$
(2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ............................................................................................
453,749
616,127
345,577
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount..........................................................
17,348
15,775
17,045
Straight-line rent revenue and other......................................................................................
(172,765)
(233,703)
(282,504)
Stock-based compensation.................................................................................................
32,976
33,250
49,421
(Gain) loss on sale of real estate ..........................................................................................
(478,693)
1,815
(536,755)
Real estate and other impairment charges, net..........................................................................
1,825,402
376,907
268,375
Equity interest real estate impairment....................................................................................
410,790
—
—
Straight-line rent and other write-off.....................................................................................
2,514
649,911
34,605
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs (benefit).............................................................
4,292
(285)
9,452
Tax rate changes and other ................................................................................................
5,119
(167,332)
10,697
Non-cash fair value adjustments..........................................................................................
563,666
(34,157)
(3,097)
Non-cash revenue from debt and equity securities received ..........................................................
—
(81,706)
—
Other adjustments...........................................................................................................
4,975
10,287
9,205
Changes in:
Interest and rent receivables...............................................................................................
2,778
(141,729)
(116,420)
Other assets ..................................................................................................................
(36,109)
13,750
(4,029)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................................................................................
23,481
(4,599)
33,576
Deferred revenue............................................................................................................
(5,753)
7,567
43
Net cash provided by operating activities .......................................................................................
245,483
505,786
739,010
Investing activities
Cash paid for acquisitions and other related investments .................................................................
(105,618)
(235,187)
(1,332,962)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate.........................................................................................
1,854,077
897,500
2,185,574
Principal received from sale and repayment of loans receivable.........................................................
214,416
501,630
53,322
Investment in loans receivable ................................................................................................
(420,324)
(250,223)
(207,542)
Construction in progress and other ...........................................................................................
(79,788)
(114,425)
(109,237)
Proceeds from sale and return of equity investments ......................................................................
11,656
12,430
14,295
Capital additions and other investments, net................................................................................
(156,078)
(294,167)
(207,394)
Net cash provided by investing activities........................................................................................
1,318,341
517,558
396,056
Financing activities
Proceeds from term debt .......................................................................................................
804,188
—
128,536
Payments of term debt..........................................................................................................
(701,809)
(988,162)
(869,606)
Revolving credit facilities, net ................................................................................................
(1,131,312)
567,910
203,576
Dividends paid ..................................................................................................................
(321,080)
(615,390)
(698,535)
Lease deposits and other obligations to tenants.............................................................................
2,237
10,139
(5,020)
Repurchase of common stock .................................................................................................
—
—
(17,940)
Stock vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings ............................................................................
(3,805)
(8,079)
(29,922)
Other financing activities, payment of debt refinancing, and deferred financing costs ...............................
(127,798)
13,255
(53,612)
Net cash used for financing activities ............................................................................................
(1,479,379)
(1,020,327)
(1,342,523)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash for the year.............................................
84,445
3,017
(207,457)
Effect of exchange rate changes ..............................................................................................
(5,224)
11,397
(12,887)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year.........................................................
255,952
241,538
461,882
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of year....................................................................
$
335,173
$
255,952
$
241,538
Interest paid, including capitalized interest of $7,642 in 2024, $14,178 in 2023,
and $6,454 in 2022 ...................................................................................................................
$
420,315
$
406,141
$
353,838
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Debt and equity securities received for certain obligations, real estate, and revenue......................................
$
—
$
804,520
$
—
Certain obligations and receivables satisfied and real estate sold............................................................
—
722,814
—
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Dividends declared, unpaid........................................................................................................
$
48,164
$
92,808
$
176,580
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are comprised of the following:
Beginning of period:
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................................
$
250,016
$
235,668
$
459,227
Restricted cash, included in Other assets ......................................................................................
5,936
5,870
2,655
$
255,952
$
241,538
$
461,882
End of period:
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................................
$
332,335
$
250,016
$
235,668
Restricted cash, included in Other assets ......................................................................................
2,838
5,936
5,870
$
335,173
$
255,952
$
241,538
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

75
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2024
2023
(Amounts in thousands,
except for per unit data)
ASSETS
Real estate assets
Land..............................................................................................................................
$
1,607,869
$
1,806,765
Buildings and improvements........................................................................................
8,847,892
10,395,612
Intangible lease assets...................................................................................................
804,081
1,034,810
Investment in financing leases......................................................................................
1,057,770
1,231,630
Real estate held for sale................................................................................................
34,019
—
Mortgage loans .............................................................................................................
119,912
309,315
Gross investment in real estate assets.......................................................................
12,471,543
14,778,132
Accumulated depreciation ............................................................................................
(1,221,644)
(1,227,619)
Accumulated amortization............................................................................................
(201,304)
(180,352)
Net investment in real estate assets ..........................................................................
11,048,595
13,370,161
Cash and cash equivalents..................................................................................................
332,335
250,016
Interest and rent receivables ...............................................................................................
36,327
45,059
Straight-line rent receivables..............................................................................................
700,783
635,987
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures....................................................
1,156,397
1,474,455
Investments in unconsolidated operating entities...............................................................
439,578
1,778,640
Other loans..........................................................................................................................
109,175
292,615
Other assets.........................................................................................................................
471,404
457,911
Total Assets .......................................................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Liabilities
Debt, net..........................................................................................................................
$
8,848,112
$
10,064,236
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................................................................
405,655
318,980
Deferred revenue ............................................................................................................
29,445
37,962
Obligations to tenants and other lease liabilities ............................................................
129,045
156,603
Payable due to Medical Properties Trust, Inc.................................................................
48,164
92,808
Total Liabilities.........................................................................................................
9,460,421
10,670,589
Commitments and Contingencies
Capital
General partner — issued and outstanding — 6,006 units at December 31, 2024 and
5,991 units at December 31, 2023 ...............................................................................
49,348
75,969
Limited Partners — issued and outstanding — 594,397 units at December 31,
2024 and 593,000 units at December 31, 2023 ...........................................................
4,878,043
7,513,520
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income..........................................................
(94,272)
42,501
Total MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. capital..................................................................
4,833,119
7,631,990
Non-controlling interests....................................................................................................
1,054
2,265
Total Capital .............................................................................................................
4,834,173
7,634,255
Total Liabilities and Capital............................................................................................
$
14,294,594
$
18,304,844
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

76
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Net Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Amounts in thousands,
except for per unit data)
Revenues
Rent billed..................................................................................................................
$
719,749
$
803,375
$
968,874
Straight-line rent ........................................................................................................
163,414
(127,894)
204,159
Income from financing leases....................................................................................
63,651
127,141
203,580
Interest and other income...........................................................................................
48,733
69,177
166,238
Total revenues........................................................................................................
995,547
871,799
1,542,851
Expenses
Interest........................................................................................................................
417,824
411,171
359,036
Real estate depreciation and amortization .................................................................
447,657
603,360
332,977
Property-related..........................................................................................................
27,255
41,567
45,697
General and administrative ........................................................................................
133,789
145,588
160,494
Total expenses........................................................................................................
1,026,525
1,201,686
898,204
Other (expense) income
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate ................................................................................
478,693
(1,815)
536,755
Real estate and other impairment charges, net...........................................................
(1,825,402)
(376,907)
(268,375)
(Loss) earnings from equity interests.........................................................................
(366,642)
13,967
40,800
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing (costs) benefit.........................................
(4,292)
285
(9,452)
Other (including fair value adjustments on securities) ..............................................
(615,565)
7,586
15,344
Total other (expense) income.................................................................................
(2,333,208)
(356,884)
315,072
(Loss) income before income tax ................................................................................
(2,364,186)
(686,771)
959,719
Income tax (expense) benefit.....................................................................................
(44,101)
130,679
(55,900)
Net (loss) income ......................................................................................................
(2,408,287)
(556,092)
903,819
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests .................................................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Net (loss) income attributable to MPT Operating Partnership partners...............
$ (2,410,271)
$
(556,476)
$
902,597
Earnings per unit — basic and diluted
Net (loss) income attributable to MPT Operating Partnership partners...........
$
(4.02)
$
(0.93)
$
1.50
Weighted average units outstanding — basic .......................................................
600,248
598,518
598,634
Weighted average units outstanding — diluted....................................................
600,248
598,518
598,837
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

77
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Net (loss) income............................................................................................................... $ (2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate hedges, net of tax..............................................
(20,779)
(34,932)
100,550
Reclassification of interest rate hedges gain from AOCI to
earnings, net of tax .....................................................................................................
(18,926)
(28,553)
—
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain........................................................................
(97,068)
162,680
(123,007)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation loss from
AOCI to earnings........................................................................................................
—
2,490
—
Total comprehensive (loss) income...................................................................................
(2,545,060)
(454,407)
881,362
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests..................................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to MPT Operating Partnership partners......... $ (2,547,044)
$
(454,791)
$
880,140
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Capital
For the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
General
Limited
Accumulated
Partner
Partners
Other
Non-
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
Units
Unit
Value
Units
Unit
Value
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Controlling
Interests
Total
Capital
Balance at December 31, 2021.........................................................
5,968
$
84,847
590,780
$
8,392,458
$
(36,727)
$
5,483
$
8,446,061
Net income .................................................................................
—
9,026
—
893,571
—
1,222
903,819
Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges, net of tax ...................................
—
—
—
—
100,550
—
100,550
Foreign currency translation loss........................................................
—
—
—
—
(123,007)
—
(123,007)
Unit vesting and amortization of unit-based compensation .........................
37
494
3,638
48,927
—
—
49,421
Unit vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings........................................
(13)
(299)
(1,289)
(29,623)
—
—
(29,922)
Repurchase of units .......................................................................
(16)
(179)
(1,629)
(17,761)
—
—
(17,940)
Acquisition of non-controlling interest.................................................
—
(304)
—
(30,124)
—
(4,594)
(35,022)
Issuance of non-controlling interests ...................................................
—
—
—
—
—
1,054
1,054
Distributions to non-controlling interests ..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
(1,596)
(1,596)
Distributions declared ($1.16 per unit).................................................
—
(6,986)
—
(691,635)
—
—
(698,621)
Balance at December 31, 2022.........................................................
5,976
$
86,599
591,500
$
8,565,813
$
(59,184)
$
1,569
$
8,594,797
Net (loss) income..........................................................................
—
(5,564)
—
(550,912)
—
384
(556,092)
Unrealized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax....................................
—
—
—
—
(34,932)
—
(34,932)
Reclassification of interest rate hedge gain to
earnings, net of tax......................................................................
—
—
—
—
(28,553)
—
(28,553)
Foreign currency translation gain .......................................................
—
—
—
—
162,680
—
162,680
Reclassification of foreign currency translation
loss to earnings ..........................................................................
—
—
—
—
2,490
—
2,490
Unit vesting and amortization of unit-based compensation .........................
25
332
2,432
32,918
—
—
33,250
Unit vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings........................................
(10)
(81)
(932)
(7,998)
—
—
(8,079)
Issuance of non-controlling interests ...................................................
—
—
—
—
—
1,375
1,375
Distributions to non-controlling interests ..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
(1,063)
(1,063)
Distributions declared ($0.88 per unit).................................................
—
(5,317)
—
(526,301)
—
—
(531,618)
Balance at December 31, 2023.........................................................
5,991
$
75,969
593,000
$
7,513,520
$
42,501
$
2,265
$
7,634,255
Net (loss) income..........................................................................
—
(24,102)
—
(2,386,169)
—
1,984
(2,408,287)
Unrealized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax....................................
—
—
—
—
(20,779)
—
(20,779)
Reclassification of interest rate hedge gain to
earnings, net of tax......................................................................
—
—
—
—
(18,926)
—
(18,926)
Foreign currency translation loss........................................................
—
—
—
—
(97,068)
—
(97,068)
Unit vesting and amortization of unit-based compensation .........................
23
285
2,150
28,129
—
—
28,414
Unit vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings........................................
(8)
(39)
(753)
(3,766)
—
—
(3,805)
Acquisitions of non-controlling interests ..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
(1,500)
(1,500)
Distributions to non-controlling interests ..............................................
—
—
—
—
—
(1,695)
(1,695)
Distributions declared ($0.46 per unit).................................................
—
(2,765)
—
(273,671)
—
—
(276,436)
Balance at December 31, 2024.........................................................
6,006
$
49,348
594,397
$
4,878,043
$
(94,272)
$
1,054
$
4,834,173
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
78

79
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Amounts in thousands)
Operating activities
Net (loss) income .......................................................................................................................
$
(2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ............................................................................................
453,749
616,127
345,577
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount..........................................................
17,348
15,775
17,045
Straight-line rent revenue and other......................................................................................
(172,765)
(233,703)
(282,504)
Unit-based compensation ..................................................................................................
32,976
33,250
49,421
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate ..........................................................................................
(478,693)
1,815
(536,755)
Real estate and other impairment charges, net..........................................................................
1,825,402
376,907
268,375
Equity interest real estate impairment....................................................................................
410,790
—
—
Straight-line rent and other write-off.....................................................................................
2,514
649,911
34,605
Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs (benefit).............................................................
4,292
(285)
9,452
Tax rate changes and other ................................................................................................
5,119
(167,332)
10,697
Non-cash fair value adjustments..........................................................................................
563,666
(34,157)
(3,097)
Non-cash revenue from debt and equity securities received ..........................................................
—
(81,706)
—
Other adjustments...........................................................................................................
4,975
10,287
9,205
Changes in:
Interest and rent receivables...............................................................................................
2,778
(141,729)
(116,420)
Other assets ..................................................................................................................
(36,109)
13,750
(4,029)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................................................................................
23,481
(4,599)
33,576
Deferred revenue............................................................................................................
(5,753)
7,567
43
Net cash provided by operating activities .......................................................................................
245,483
505,786
739,010
Investing activities
Cash paid for acquisitions and other related investments .................................................................
(105,618)
(235,187)
(1,332,962)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate.........................................................................................
1,854,077
897,500
2,185,574
Principal received from sale and repayment of loans receivable.........................................................
214,416
501,630
53,322
Investment in loans receivable ................................................................................................
(420,324)
(250,223)
(207,542)
Construction in progress and other ...........................................................................................
(79,788)
(114,425)
(109,237)
Proceeds from sale and return of equity investments ......................................................................
11,656
12,430
14,295
Capital additions and other investments, net................................................................................
(156,078)
(294,167)
(207,394)
Net cash provided by investing activities........................................................................................
1,318,341
517,558
396,056
Financing activities
Proceeds from term debt .......................................................................................................
804,188
—
128,536
Payments of term debt..........................................................................................................
(701,809)
(988,162)
(869,606)
Revolving credit facilities, net ................................................................................................
(1,131,312)
567,910
203,576
Distributions paid ...............................................................................................................
(321,080)
(615,390)
(698,535)
Lease deposits and other obligations to tenants.............................................................................
2,237
10,139
(5,020)
Repurchase of units.............................................................................................................
—
—
(17,940)
Unit vesting - satisfaction of tax withholdings..............................................................................
(3,805)
(8,079)
(29,922)
Other financing activities, payment of debt refinancing, and deferred financing costs ...............................
(127,798)
13,255
(53,612)
Net cash used for financing activities ............................................................................................
(1,479,379)
(1,020,327)
(1,342,523)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash for the year.............................................
84,445
3,017
(207,457)
Effect of exchange rate changes ..............................................................................................
(5,224)
11,397
(12,887)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year.........................................................
255,952
241,538
461,882
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year ....................................................................
$
335,173
$
255,952
$
241,538
Interest paid, including capitalized interest of $7,642 in 2024, $14,178 in 2023,
and $6,454 in 2022 ...................................................................................................................
$
420,315
$
406,141
$
353,838
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Debt and equity securities received for certain obligations, real estate, and revenue......................................
$
—
$
804,520
$
—
Certain obligations and receivables satisfied and real estate sold............................................................
—
722,814
—
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Dividends declared, unpaid........................................................................................................
$
48,164
$
92,808
$
176,580
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are comprised of the following:
Beginning of period:
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................................
$
250,016
$
235,668
$
459,227
Restricted cash, included in Other assets ......................................................................................
5,936
5,870
2,655
$
255,952
$
241,538
$
461,882
End of period:
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................................
$
332,335
$
250,016
$
235,668
Restricted cash, included in Other assets ......................................................................................
2,838
5,936
5,870
$
335,173
$
255,952
$
241,538
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

80
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization
Medical Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was formed on August 27, 2003, under the Maryland General
Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in, owning, and leasing healthcare real estate. Our operating
partnership subsidiary, MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), through which we conduct substantially all of
our operations, was formed in September 2003. At present, we own, directly and indirectly, all of the partnership interests in the
Operating Partnership and have elected to report our required disclosures and that of the Operating Partnership on a combined basis,
except where material differences exist.
We operate as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Accordingly, we are generally not subject to United States (“U.S.”)
federal income tax on our REIT taxable income, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT and our distributions to our
stockholders equal or exceed such taxable income. Similarly, the majority of our real estate operations in the United Kingdom
("U.K.") operate as a REIT and generally are subject only to a withholding tax on earnings upon distribution out of the U.K. REIT.
Certain non-real estate activities we undertake in the U.S. are conducted by entities which we elected to be treated as taxable REIT
subsidiaries (“TRS”). Our TRS entities are subject to both U.S. federal and state income taxes. For our properties located outside the
U.S. (excluding those assets that are in the U.K. REIT), we are subject to the local income taxes of the jurisdictions where our
properties reside and/or legal entities are domiciled; however, we do not expect to incur additional taxes, of a significant nature, in the
U.S. from foreign-based income as the majority of such income flows through our REIT.
Our primary business strategy is to acquire and develop healthcare facilities and lease the facilities to healthcare operating
companies under long-term net leases, which require the tenant to bear most of the costs associated with the property. The majority of
our leased assets are owned 100%; however, we do own some leased assets through joint ventures with other partners that share our
view that healthcare facilities are part of the infrastructure of any community, which we refer to as investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures. We also may make mortgage loans to healthcare operators collateralized by their real estate. In addition, we may
make noncontrolling investments in our tenants (which we refer to as investments in unconsolidated operating entities), from time-to-
time, typically in conjunction with larger real estate transactions with the tenant, which may enhance our overall return and provide for
certain minority rights and protections.
Our business model facilitates acquisitions and recapitalizations, and allows operators of healthcare facilities to unlock the value
of their real estate to fund facility improvements, technology upgrades, and other investments in operations. At December 31, 2024,
we have investments in 396 facilities in 31 states in the U.S., in seven countries in Europe, and one country in South America. Our
properties consist of general acute care hospitals, behavioral health facilities, post acute care facilities (including inpatient physical
rehabilitation facilities and long-term acute care hospitals), and freestanding ER/urgent care facilities.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates: The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. We believe the estimates and assumptions underlying our consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2024 are reasonable and supportable based on the information available (particularly as it relates to our assessments of
the recoverability of our real estate and the adequacy of our credit loss reserves on loans and financing receivables). Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation: Property holding entities and other subsidiaries of which we own 100% of the equity or have a
controlling financial interest evidenced by ownership of a majority voting interest are consolidated. All inter-company balances and
transactions are eliminated. For entities in which we own less than 100% of the equity interest, we consolidate the property if we have
the direct or indirect ability to control the entities’ activities based upon the terms of the respective entities’ ownership agreements.
For these entities, we record a non-controlling interest representing equity held by non-controlling interests.
We continually evaluate all of our transactions and investments to determine if they represent variable interests in a variable
interest entity ("VIE"). If we determine that we have a variable interest in a VIE, we then evaluate if we are the primary beneficiary of
the VIE. The evaluation is a qualitative assessment as to whether we have the ability to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. We consolidate each VIE in which we, by virtue of or transactions with our
investments in the entity, are considered to be the primary beneficiary.

81
At December 31, 2024, we had loans and/or equity investments in certain VIEs, which may also be tenants of our facilities. We
have determined that we were not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. The carrying value and classification of the related assets and
maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with these VIEs at December 31, 2024 are presented below (in thousands):
VIE Type
Carrying
Amount(1)
Asset Type
Classification
Maximum Loss
Exposure(2)
Loans, net and equity investments........................ $
149,027
Investments in Unconsolidated
Operating Entities
$
149,027
Loans, net..............................................................
117,187
Mortgage and other loans
117,268
(1)
Carrying amount only reflects the net book value of our loan or equity investment in the VIE.
(2)
Our maximum loss exposure related to loans with VIEs represents our current aggregate gross carrying value of the loan
plus accrued interest and any other related assets (such as rent receivables), less any liabilities. Our maximum loss
exposure related to our equity investments in VIEs represents the current carrying values of such investments plus any
other related assets (such as rent receivables), less any liabilities.
For the VIE types above, we do not consolidate the VIEs because we do not have the ability to control the activities (such as the
day-to-day healthcare operations of our borrowers or investees) that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. As of
December 31, 2024, we were not required to provide financial support through a liquidity arrangement or otherwise to our
unconsolidated VIEs, including circumstances in which they could be exposed to further losses (e.g. cash short falls).
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities: Investments in entities in which we have the ability to significantly influence (but not
control) are accounted for by the equity method. This includes the five investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures at
December 31, 2024. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses are included in the “(Loss)
earnings from equity interests” line of our consolidated statements of net income. Except for our joint venture with Primotop Holdings
S.à.r.l. ("Primotop") (for which we handle the accounting of), we have elected to record our share of such investee’s earnings or losses
on a lag basis (not to exceed three months). The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount
paid to purchase the interest in the investee entity. Subsequently, our investments are increased/decreased by our share in the
investees’ earnings/losses and decreased by cash distributions from our investees. To the extent that our cost basis is different from the
basis reflected at the investee entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities,
and such amortization is included in our share of equity in earnings of the investee.
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the fair value of the equity method
investment to its carrying value, when impairment indicators exist. If we determine a decline in the fair value of an investment in an
unconsolidated investee entity below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded.
Investments in entities in which we do not control nor do we have the ability to significantly influence and for which there is no
readily determinable fair value are accounted for at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price
changes in orderly transactions involving the investee. Cash distributions on these types of investments are recorded to either income
upon receipt (if a return on investment) or as a reduction of our investment (if the distributions received are in excess of our share of
the investee’s earnings). For similar investments but for which there are readily determinable fair values, such investments are
measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in income.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Certificates of deposit, short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less, and
money-market mutual funds are considered cash equivalents. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents are held at major
commercial banks, which at times may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit. We have not experienced any losses
to-date on our invested cash. Cash and cash equivalents which have been restricted as to its use are recorded in other assets.
Revenue Recognition: Our revenues are primarily from leases and loans. For leases, we follow Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) 842, “Leases”, (“ASC 842”). ASC 842 sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation,
and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). For lessors, we apply this standard as follows:
Operating Lease Revenue
We receive income from operating leases based on the fixed required rents (base rents) per the lease agreements. Rent revenue
from base rents is recorded on the cash basis method, when collectability of the lease payments is not deemed probable. Rent revenue
from base rents is recorded on the straight-line method, when collectability of the lease payments is deemed probable, over the terms
of the related lease agreements for new leases and the remaining terms of existing leases for those acquired as part of a property

82
acquisition. The straight-line method records the periodic average amount of base rents earned over the term of a lease, taking into
account contractual rent increases over the lease term. The straight-line method typically has the effect of recording more rent revenue
from a lease than a tenant is required to pay early in the term of the lease. During the later parts of a lease term, this effect reverses
with less rent revenue recorded than a tenant is required to pay. Rent revenue, as recorded on the straight-line method, in our
consolidated statements of net income is presented as two amounts: rent billed and straight-line rent. Rent billed revenue is the amount
of base rent actually billed to our tenants each period as required by the lease. Straight-line rent revenue is the difference between rent
revenue earned based on the straight-line method and the amount recorded as rent billed revenue. We record the difference between
rent revenues earned and amounts due per the respective lease agreements, as applicable, as an increase or decrease to straight-line
rent receivables.
Rental payments received prior to their recognition as income are classified as deferred revenue.
Financing Lease Revenue
Under ASC 842, if an acquisition and subsequent lease of a property back to the seller does not meet the definition of a sale, we
must account for the transaction as a financing lease with income recognized using the imputed interest method.
Another type of financing lease is a direct financing lease (“DFL”). For leases accounted for as DFLs, the future minimum lease
payments are recorded as a receivable at lease inception, while, the difference between the future minimum lease payments and the
estimated residual values less the cost of the properties is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to
income over the lease term to provide a constant yield when collectability of the lease payments is reasonably assured. Investments in
DFLs are presented net of unearned income.
Other Leasing Revenue
We begin recording base rent income from our development projects when the lessee takes physical possession of the facility,
which may be different from the stated start date of the lease. Also, during construction of our development projects, we may be
entitled to accrue rent based on the cost paid during the construction period (construction period rent). We accrue construction period
rent as a receivable with a corresponding offset to deferred revenue during the construction period. When the lessee takes physical
possession of the facility, we begin recognizing the deferred construction period revenue on the straight-line method over the term of
the lease.
We also receive additional rent (contingent rent) under some leases based on increases in the consumer price index (“CPI”) (or
similar index outside the U.S.) or when CPI exceeds the annual minimum percentage increase as stipulated in the lease. Contingent
rents are recorded as rent billed revenue in the period earned.
Tenant payments for ground leases along with other operating expenses, such as property taxes and insurance, that are paid
directly by us and reimbursed by our tenants are presented on a gross basis with the related revenues recorded in “Interest and other
income” and the related expenses in “Property-related” in our consolidated statements of net income. All payments of other operating
expenses made directly by the tenant to the applicable government or appropriate third-party vendor are recorded on a net basis.
Interest Revenue
We receive interest income from our tenants/borrowers on mortgage loans, working capital loans, and other long-term loans.
Interest income from these loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal outstanding and terms of the loans.
Other Revenue
Commitment fees received on operating lessees for development and leasing services are initially recorded as deferred revenue
and recognized as income over the initial term of a lease on the straight-line method. Commitment and origination fees from lending
services are also recorded as deferred revenue initially and recognized as income over the life of the loan using the interest method.
Acquired Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation: We account for acquisitions of real estate under asset acquisition accounting
rules. Under this accounting standard, we allocate the purchase price (including any third-party transaction costs directly related to the
acquisition) of acquired properties to tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed (if any) based on their
relative fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase prices of acquired real estate, we may utilize
a number of sources, from time-to-time, including available real estate broker data, independent appraisals that may be obtained in
connection with the acquisition, internal data from previous acquisitions or developments, and other market data, including market
comparables for significant assumptions such as market rental, capitalization, and discount rates. We also consider information

83
obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, and leasing activities in estimating the fair
value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.
We measure the aggregate value of lease intangible assets acquired based on the difference between (i) the property valued with
new or in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (ii) the property valued as if vacant. Management’s estimates of value are
made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by
management in our analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current
market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about each targeted facility as a result of
our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the intangible assets acquired. In
estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals
at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, which we expect to be about six months, but can be longer depending on specific
local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal costs, and
other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the
transaction.
Other intangible assets acquired may include customer relationship intangible values which are based on management’s
evaluation of the specific characteristics of each prospective tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that tenant. Characteristics
to be considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the
tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality, and expectations of lease renewals,
including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement, among other factors.
We amortize the value of our lease intangible assets to expense over the term of the respective leases. If a lease is terminated
early, the unamortized portion of the lease intangibles are charged to expense.
We record above-market and below-market in-place lease values, if any, for our facilities, which are based on the present value
of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair
market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the
lease. We amortize any resulting capitalized above-market lease values as a reduction of rental income over the lease term. We
amortize any resulting capitalized below-market lease values as an increase to rental income over the lease term. If a lease is
terminated early, the unamortized portion of the capitalized above/below market lease value is recognized in rental income at that
time.
Real Estate and Depreciation: Real estate, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, is maintained at cost. Although
typically paid by our tenants, any expenditure for ordinary maintenance and repairs that we pay are expensed to operations as incurred.
Significant renovations and improvements, which improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives. We review real estate investments for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the
assets may not be recoverable. We analyze recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the real estate assets to a probability-
weighted set of estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by those assets, including an estimated liquidation amount, during
the expected holding periods. Assumptions used in determining undiscounted cash flows may include, but are not limited to, market
rental rates, capitalization rates, and holding periods. If the recoverability analysis indicates that the carrying value of the real estate
asset is greater than the expected future undiscounted cash flows, impairment losses are measured as the difference between carrying
value and fair value of the assets. Future cash flows are discounted when determining fair value of an asset. Estimated future cash
flows used in such analysis are based on our plans for the real estate asset and our view of market economic conditions. Assumptions
used in determining fair value may include, but are not limited to, market rental rates, discount rates, and capitalization rates.
When a real estate investment is designated as held for sale, we cease recording depreciation expense and adjust the assets’
value to the lower of its carrying value or fair value, less cost of disposal. Fair value is typically based on estimated cash flows
discounted at a risk-adjusted rate of interest. We classify real estate assets as held for sale when we have commenced an active
program to sell the assets, and in the opinion of management, it is probable the asset will be sold within the next 12 months.
Construction in progress includes the cost of land, the cost of construction of buildings, improvements, and fixed equipment,
and costs for design and engineering. Other costs, such as interest, legal, property taxes, and corporate project supervision, which can
be directly associated with the project during construction, are also included in construction in progress. We commence capitalization
of costs associated with a development project when the development of the future asset is probable and activities necessary to get the
underlying property ready for its intended use have been initiated. We stop the capitalization of costs when the property is
substantially complete and ready for its intended use.

84
Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related real estate and other assets.
Our weighted-average useful lives at December 31, 2024 are as follows:
Buildings and improvements .............................................................................................................
38.6 years
Lease intangibles................................................................................................................................
28.3 years
Leasehold improvements ...................................................................................................................
14.3 years
Furniture, equipment, and other.........................................................................................................
5.2 years
Credit Losses:
Losses from Rent Receivables: For our leases, we review tenant provided financial data and monitor the performance of our
tenants in areas generally consisting of: admission levels and surgery/procedure volumes by type; current operating margins; ratio of
our tenant's operating margins both to facility rent and to facility rent plus other fixed costs; trends in revenue, cash collections, patient
mix; and the effect of evolving healthcare regulations, adverse economic and political conditions, such as rising inflation and interest
rates, and other events ongoing on a tenant's profitability and liquidity.
Losses from Operating Lease Receivables: We utilize the information above along with the tenant’s payment and
default history in evaluating (on a property-by-property basis) whether or not a provision for losses on outstanding billed rent
and/or straight-line rent receivables is needed. A provision for losses on rent receivables (including straight-line rent
receivables) is ultimately recorded when it becomes probable that the receivable will not be collected in full. The provision is an
amount which reduces lease income to the lesser of a) lease payments that have been collected (cash basis) or b) income under
the straight-line method.
Losses on Financing Lease Receivables: We apply a forward-looking “expected credit loss” model to all of our
financing receivables, including financing leases and loans. To do this, we group our financial instruments into two primary
pools of similar credit risk: secured and unsecured. The secured instruments include our investments in financing receivables as
all are secured by the underlying real estate, among other collateral. Within the two primary pools, we further group our
instruments into sub-pools based on several tenant/borrower characteristics, including years of experience in the healthcare
industry and in a particular market or region and overall capitalization. We then determine a credit loss percentage per pool
based on our history over a period of time that closely matches the remaining terms of the financial instruments being analyzed
and adjust as needed for current trends or unusual circumstances. We apply these credit loss percentages to the book value of the
related instruments to establish a credit loss reserve on our financing lease receivables and such credit loss reserve (including the
underlying assumptions) is reviewed and adjusted quarterly. If a financing receivable is under performing and is deemed
uncollectible based on the lessee’s overall financial condition, we will adjust the credit loss reserve based on the fair value of the
underlying collateral.
We made the accounting policy election to exclude interest receivables from the credit loss reserve model. Instead,
such receivables are impaired and an allowance recorded when it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all
amounts due. Like operating lease receivables, the need for an allowance is based upon our assessment of the lessee’s overall
financial condition, economic resources and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible
guarantors, and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. Financing leases are placed on non-accrual status when we
determine that the collectability of contractual amounts is not reasonably assured. If on non-accrual status, we generally account
for the financing lease on a cash basis, in which income is recognized only upon receipt of cash.
Loans: Loans consist of mortgage loans, working capital loans, and other loans. Mortgage loans are collateralized by interests in
real property. Working capital and other loans are typically collateralized by interests in receivables and corporate and individual
guarantees. We record loans at cost. Like our financing lease receivables, we establish credit loss reserves on all outstanding loans
based on historical credit losses of similar instruments. Such credit loss reserves, including the underlying assumptions, are reviewed
and adjusted quarterly. If a loan’s performance worsens and foreclosure is deemed probable for our collateral-based loans (after
considering the borrower’s overall financial condition as described above for leases), we will adjust the allowance for expected credit
losses based on the current fair value of such collateral at the time the loan is deemed uncollectible. If the loan is not collateralized, the
loan will be reserved for/written-off once it is determined that such loan is no longer collectible. Interest receivables on loans are
excluded from the forward looking credit loss reserve model; however, we assess their collectability similar to how we assess
collectability for interest receivables on financing leases described above.

85
The following table summarizes our credit loss reserves (in thousands):
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Balance at beginning of the year......................................................... $
96,001
$
121,146
Provision for credit loss, net..............................................................
1,241,020
10,194
Expected credit loss reserve written off or related to financial
instruments sold, repaid, or satisfied............................................
(825,548)
(35,339)
Balance at end of year ......................................................................... $
511,473
$
96,001
Earnings Per Share/Units: Basic earnings per common share/unit is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of shares/units outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share/unit is calculated by including the effect of
dilutive securities.
Our unvested restricted stock awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and accordingly, these awards are deemed to be
participating securities. These participating securities are included in the earnings allocation in computing both basic and diluted
earnings per common share/unit.
Income Taxes: We conduct our business as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (“the Code”). To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a
requirement to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of our REIT’s ordinary taxable income. As a REIT, we generally pay little U.S.
federal and state income tax because of the dividends paid deduction that we are allowed to take. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any
taxable year, we will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be
permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which
qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could
materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we intend to operate in
such a manner so that we will remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Our financial statements include the operations of TRS entities. None of our TRS entities are entitled to a dividends paid
deduction and are subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes. Our TRS entities are authorized to provide property
development, leasing, and management services for third-party owned properties, and we will make non-mortgage loans to and/or
investments in our lessees through these entities.
With the property acquisitions and investments in Europe and South America, we are subject to income taxes internationally.
However, we do not expect to incur any additional income taxes, of a significant nature, in the U.S. as the majority of such income
from our international properties flows through our REIT income tax returns. For our TRS entities and international subsidiaries, we
determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in our
deferred tax assets/liabilities that results from a change in circumstances and that causes us to change our judgment about expected
future tax consequences of events, is reflected in our tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the
impact of operating loss carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some
portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change
in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about our ability to realize the related deferred tax asset, is reflected in
our tax provision when such changes occur.
The calculation of our income taxes involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in
a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. An income tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized
when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or
litigation processes, on the basis of technical merits. However, if a more likely than not position cannot be reached, we record a
liability as an offset to the tax benefit and adjust the liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new
information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a
payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the uncertain tax position liabilities. These differences will be
reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which new information is available.
Stock-Based Compensation: We adopted the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) during the second quarter
of 2019, which was amended during the second quarter of 2022. Equity awards of restricted stock with service conditions are valued
at the average stock price per share on the date of grant and are amortized to compensation expense over the service periods (typically
three years), using the straight-line method. Equity awards that contain market conditions are valued on the grant date using a Monte
Carlo valuation model and are amortized to compensation expense over the derived service periods, which correspond to the periods
over which we estimate the awards will be earned, which generally range from three to five years, using the straight-line method.

86
Equity awards with performance conditions are valued at the average stock price per share on the date of grant and are amortized
using the straight-line method over the service period, adjusted for the probability of achieving the performance conditions. In 2024,
certain market-based restricted stock units ("RSUs") were issued with cash-settlement features. These liability-type awards are
adjusted to fair value (using a Monte Carlo valuation model) on a quarterly basis and amortized over the derived service period, which
is also adjusted on a quarterly basis. Forfeitures of stock-based awards are recognized as they occur.
Deferred Costs: Costs incurred that directly relate to the offerings of stock are deferred and netted against proceeds received
from the offering. Leasing commissions and other third-party leasing costs that would not have been incurred if the lease was not
obtained are capitalized as deferred leasing costs and amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of the related lease
agreements. Costs identifiable with loans made to borrowers are capitalized and recognized as a reduction in interest income over the
life of the loan.
Deferred Financing Costs: We generally capitalize financing costs incurred in connection with new financings and refinancings
of debt. These costs are amortized over the lives of the related debt as an addition to interest expense. For debt with defined principal
re-payment terms, the deferred costs are amortized to produce a constant effective yield on the debt (interest method) and are included
within “Debt, net” on our consolidated balance sheets. For debt without defined principal repayment terms, such as our revolving
credit facility, the deferred costs are amortized on the straight-line method over the term of the debt and are included as a component
of “Other assets” on our consolidated balance sheets.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions: Certain of our international subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local
currencies of their respective countries. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using
average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end
of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component
of stockholders’ equity/partnership capital on our consolidated balance sheets.
Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries will enter into short-term and long-term transactions denominated in a foreign currency from
time-to-time. Gains or losses resulting from these foreign currency transactions are revalued into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange
prevailing at the dates of the transactions. The effects of revaluation gains or losses on our short-term transactions are included in
other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income, while the revaluation effects on our long-term investments are
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative Financial Investments and Hedging Activities: During our normal course of business, we may use certain types of
derivative instruments for the purpose of managing interest rate and/or foreign currency risk. We record our derivative and hedging
instruments at fair value on the balance sheet. Changes in the estimated fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as
hedges or that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges, the change in the estimated fair value of the effective portion of the derivative is recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on our consolidated balance sheets, whereas the change in the estimated fair value of the ineffective
portion is recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the change in the estimated fair value of the
effective portion of the derivative offsets the change in the estimated fair value of the hedged item, whereas the change in the
estimated fair value of the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings.
To qualify for hedge accounting, we formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as
well as our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge prior to entering into a derivative transaction. This
process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedge transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and
how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in hedging the exposure to the hedged transaction’s variability in cash flows attributable to
the hedged risk will be assessed. Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the derivatives that are
used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items. In addition, for
cash flow hedges, we assess whether the underlying forecasted transaction will occur. We discontinue hedge accounting if a derivative
is not determined to be highly effective as a hedge or that it is probable that the underlying forecasted transaction will not occur.
Fair Value Measurement: We measure and disclose the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities utilizing a
hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or
unobservable in a marketplace. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs

87
reflect our market assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. These inputs have created
the following fair value hierarchy:
•
Level 1 — quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
•
Level 2 — quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are
observable in active markets; and
•
Level 3 — fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or
significant value drivers are unobservable.
We measure fair value using a set of standardized procedures that are outlined herein for all assets and liabilities which are
required to be measured at their estimated fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis. When available, we utilize quoted
market prices from an independent third party source to determine fair value and classify such items in Level 1. In some instances
where a market price is available, but the instrument is in an inactive or over-the-counter market, we apply the dealer (market maker)
pricing estimate and classify the asset or liability in Level 2.
If quoted market prices or inputs are not available, fair value measurements are based upon valuation models that utilize current
market or independently sourced market inputs, such as interest rates, option volatilities, credit spreads, market capitalization rates,
etc. Items valued using such internally-generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. As a result, the asset or liability could be classified in either Level 2 or 3 even though there
may be some significant inputs that are readily observable. Internal fair value models and techniques that have been used by us include
discounted cash flow, market approach valuations, and Monte Carlo valuation models. We also consider counterparty’s and our own
credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at their estimated fair value.
Fair Value Option Election: For our equity investment in the international joint venture and PHP Holdings, along with any
related investments such as loans (see Note 10 for more details), we have elected to account for these investments at fair value due to
the size of the investments and because we believe this method is more reflective of current values. We have not made a similar
election for other investments that exist at December 31, 2024.
Leases (Lessee)
Pursuant to ASC 842, we are required to apply a dual approach, classifying leases (in which we are the lessee) as either
financing or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase. This classification
determines whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method (for finance leases) or on a straight-line basis
(for operating leases) over the term of the lease. We record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all material leases with a term
greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are off balance sheet with lease
expense recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Segment Reporting
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic
280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures" ("ASU 2023-07") to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements.
We adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2024 and have included the required disclosures within Note 13 - Segment
Disclosures.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation.
Recent Accounting Developments
Income Taxes
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures"
("ASU 2023-09") which focuses on income tax disclosures regarding effective tax rates and cash income taxes paid. This standard
requires public entities to disclose (1) specific categories in the rate reconciliation, (2) the income or loss from continuing operations
before income tax expense or benefit disaggregated by domestic and foreign, and (3) provide additional information for certain
reconciling items at or above a quantitative threshold of 5% of the statutory tax. Additionally, this standard requires disclosure of

88
income taxes paid (net of refunds), separated by international, federal, state, and local jurisdictions. ASU 2023-09 is effective for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We plan to adopt and include the necessary additional required disclosures in our
filings in 2025.
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense
Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses" ("ASU 2024-03") to improve the
disclosures about a public company's expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of
expenses in commonly presented expense captions. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026.
We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Real Estate and Other Activities
New Investments
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, we acquired or invested in the following net assets (in thousands):
2024
2023
2022
Land and land improvements............................................................ $
—
$
28,916
$
135,301
Buildings ...........................................................................................
—
114,966
487,698
Intangible lease assets — subject to amortization
(weighted-average useful life of 24.8 years in 2023
and 21.3 years in 2022).................................................................
—
16,305
45,394
Mortgage loans..................................................................................
—
—
159,735
Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures..................
107,908
—
399,456
Investments in unconsolidated operating entities .............................
—
50,000
131,105
Other loans ........................................................................................
—
25,000
—
Liabilities assumed............................................................................
(2,290)
—
(25,727)
$
105,618
$
235,187
$
1,332,962
Loans repaid(1) .................................................................................
—
(22,900)
—
Total net assets acquired ............................................................... $
105,618
$
212,287
$
1,332,962
(1)
The 2023 column includes a $23 million mortgage loan that was converted to fee simple ownership of one property as
described under the Lifepoint Transaction below.
2024 Activity
Utah Transaction
On April 12, 2024, we sold our interests in five Utah hospitals for an aggregate agreed valuation of approximately $1.2
billion to a newly formed joint venture (the "Utah partnership") with an institutional asset manager (the "Fund"), which we call the
Utah Transaction, and we recognized a gain on real estate of approximately $380 million, partially offset by a $20 million write-off of
unbilled straight-line rent receivables. We retained an approximately 25% interest in the Utah partnership valued initially at
approximately $108 million, which is being accounted for on the equity method on a quarterly lag basis and included in the
"Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures" line of the consolidated balance sheets. The Fund purchased an approximate
75% interest for $886 million. In conjunction with this transaction closing, the Utah partnership placed new non-recourse secured
financing, providing $190 million of additional cash to us. In total, the Utah Transaction generated $1.1 billion of cash to us. The Utah
lessee (an affiliate of CommonSpirit Health ("CommonSpirit")) may acquire the leased real estate at a price equal to the greater of fair
market value and the approximate $1.2 billion lease base at the fifth or tenth anniversary of the 2023 master lease commencement. We
granted the Fund certain limited and conditional preferences based on the possible execution of the purchase option, which we
accounted for as a derivative liability with an initial value of approximately $2.3 million.
2023 Activity
Prospect Transaction
In August 2019, we invested in a portfolio of 14 acute care hospitals in three states (California, Pennsylvania, and
Connecticut) operated by and master leased to or mortgaged by Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. ("Prospect") for a combined
investment of approximately $1.5 billion. In addition, we originated a $112.9 million term loan cross-defaulted to the master lease and

89
mortgage loan agreements and further secured by a parent guaranty. In the 2022 second quarter, we funded an additional $100 million
towards the existing mortgage loan that was secured by a first lien on a California hospital. Prospect's operations were negatively
impacted by the coronavirus global pandemic commencing in early 2020, but Prospect remained current with respect to contractual
rent and interest payments until the fourth quarter of 2022. Accordingly, and due further to the termination of certain refinancing
negotiations between Prospect and certain third parties in early 2023 that would have recapitalized Prospect and provided for payment
of unpaid rent and interest, we recorded an approximate $280 million impairment charge in the 2022 fourth quarter. As part of this
charge, we reduced the carrying value of the underperforming Pennsylvania properties by approximately $170 million (to
approximately $250 million) and reserved all unbilled rent accruals for a total of $112 million.
However, Prospect continued to pursue a recapitalization plan, and, in late March 2023, Prospect received a binding
commitment from several lenders to provide liquidity to pay down certain debt instruments. Along with these commitments from
third-party lenders, we agreed to pursue certain transactions with Prospect as part of their recapitalization plan, including originating a
$50 million convertible loan to PHP Holdings, the managed care business of Prospect, in the first quarter of 2023.
On May 23, 2023, Prospect completed its recapitalization plan, which included receiving $375 million in new financing from
several lenders. Along with this new debt capital from third-party lenders, we agreed to the following restructuring of our then $1.7
billion investment in Prospect including: a) maintaining the master lease covering six California hospitals without any changes in
rental rates or escalator provisions, but with cash payments to start in September 2023 for a substantial portion of the contractual
monthly rent due on these California properties, b) transitioning the Pennsylvania properties back to Prospect in return for a $150
million first lien mortgage on the facilities, c) providing up to $75 million in a loan secured by a first lien on Prospect's accounts
receivable and certain other assets, of which we funded in full during 2023, d) continuing to pursue the sale of the three Connecticut
properties to Yale New Haven ("Yale"), and e) obtaining a non-controlling ownership interest in PHP Holdings of approximately $654
million consisting of an approximate $68 million equity investment and $586 million loan convertible into equity of PHP Holdings
(collectively, the "Prospect Transaction"). This non-controlling ownership interest was received in exchange for unpaid rent and
interest through December 2022, previously unrecorded rent and interest revenue in 2023 totaling approximately $82 million, our
$151 million mortgage loan on a California property, our $112.9 million term loan, and other obligations at the time of such
investment.
See subheading "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" in this Note 3 for further updates on Prospect.
Lifepoint Transaction
On February 7, 2023, a subsidiary of Lifepoint Health, Inc. ("Lifepoint") acquired a majority interest in Springstone (now
Lifepoint Behavioral Health, "Lifepoint Behavioral") (the "Lifepoint Transaction") based on an enterprise value of $250 million. As
part of the transaction, we received approximately $205 million in full satisfaction of our initial acquisition loan, including accrued
interest, and we retained our minority equity investment in the operations of Lifepoint Behavioral. Separately, we converted a
mortgage loan (as part of our initial acquisition in 2021) into the fee simple ownership of a property in Washington, which is leased,
along with other behavioral health hospitals, to Lifepoint Behavioral, under a master lease agreement. In connection with the Lifepoint
Transaction, Lifepoint extended its lease on eight existing general acute care hospitals by five years to 2041.
In the first quarter of 2024, we sold our minority equity investment in Lifepoint Behavioral for approximately $12 million.
Other Transactions
In the second quarter of 2023, we acquired three inpatient rehabilitation facilities for a total of approximately €70 million
(approximately $77 million). These hospitals are leased to Median Kliniken S.á.r.l ("MEDIAN") pursuant to a long-term master lease
with annual inflation-based escalators.
On April 14, 2023, we acquired five behavioral health hospitals located in the U.K. for approximately £44 million
(approximately $58 million). These hospitals are leased to Priory pursuant to five separate lease agreements with annual inflation-
based escalators.
2022 Activity
Macquarie Transaction
On March 14, 2022, we completed a transaction with Macquarie Asset Management ("Macquarie"), an unrelated party, to
form a partnership (the “Macquarie Transaction”), pursuant to which we contributed eight Massachusetts-based general acute care
hospitals that were leased to Steward, and a fund managed by Macquarie acquired, for cash consideration, a 50% interest in the
partnership. The transaction valued the portfolio at approximately $1.7 billion, and we recognized a gain on sale of real estate of
approximately $600 million from this transaction, partially offset by the write-off of unbilled straight-line rent receivables. The
partnership raised nonrecourse secured debt of 55% of asset value, and we received proceeds, including from the secured debt, of
approximately $1.3 billion. We obtained a 50% interest in the real estate partnership valued at approximately $400 million (included
in the "Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures" line of our consolidated balance sheets), which was accounted for
under the equity method of accounting.

90
See subheading "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" in this Note 3 for an update on this partnership.
Other Transactions
On December 9, 2022, we acquired six behavioral health facilities in the U.K. for £233 million ($286 million), plus customary
tax and other transaction costs. These hospitals are leased to Priory pursuant to separate long-term leases with inflation-based
escalators. As part of this transaction, the third-party seller of the real estate provided £105 million of seller financing - see Note 4 for
further details on this debt.
On March 11, 2022, we acquired four general acute care hospitals in Finland for €178 million ($194 million). These hospitals
are leased to Pihlajalinna pursuant to a long-term lease with annual inflation-based escalators. We acquired these facilities by
purchasing the shares of the real estate holding entities, which included deferred income tax and other liabilities of approximately $26
million.
On February 16, 2022, we agreed to participate in an existing syndicated term loan with a term of six years originated on behalf
of Priory, of which we funded £96.5 million towards a £100 million participation level in the variable rate loan.
Other investments in 2022 included six general acute care facilities. Three general acute care facilities, located throughout
Spain, were acquired on April 29, 2022 for €27 million and are leased to GenesisCare pursuant to a long-term lease with annual
inflation-based escalators. Two general acute care facilities, one in Arizona and the other in Florida, were acquired on April 18 and 25,
2022, respectively, for approximately $80 million and are leased to Steward pursuant to a master lease agreement with annual
inflation-based escalators. The other general acute care facility, located in Colombia, was acquired on July 29, 2022 for $26 million
and is leased to Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia pursuant to a long-term lease with inflation-based escalators.
Development and Capital Addition Activities
See table below for a status summary of our current development and capital addition projects (in thousands):
Property
Commitment
Costs
Paid as of
December 31, 2024
Cost Remaining
Lifepoint Behavioral (Arizona)........................................................ $
10,504
$
5,411
$
5,093
Lifepoint Behavioral (Kansas) .........................................................
20,183
11,584
8,599
Surgery Partners (Idaho) ..................................................................
15,993
5,590
10,403
Lifepoint Behavioral (Arizona)........................................................
10,659
470
10,189
IMED Hospitales (Spain).................................................................
49,749
21,355
28,394
IMED Hospitales (Spain).................................................................
36,294
29,261
7,033
Other (Various) ................................................................................
799
494
305
$
144,181
$
74,165
$
70,016
We have two other development projects ongoing in Texas (Texarkana development) and Massachusetts (Norwood
redevelopment). These are not highlighted above; however, we are presently completing construction to the stage where the building
is "weathered in" and environmentally secure so as to physically protect our investment while we actively market the hospitals for sale
or lease. As of December 31, 2024, we estimate that the cost to complete construction to this stage approximates $30 million.
Separately, on the Norwood redevelopment, we recovered from our casualty insurers cash in November 2024 that was in excess
of our recovery receivable related to the 2020 storm losses (included in "Other assets" in the consolidated balance sheets), resulting in
a $24 million additional recovery in the 2024 third quarter.
2024 Activity
During the fourth quarter of 2024, we completed construction and began recording rental income on an existing general acute
care facility located in Idaho Falls, Idaho for a total amount of approximately $50 million.
During the first quarter of 2024, we completed construction and began recording rental income on a $35.4 million behavioral
health facility located in McKinney, Texas, that is leased to Lifepoint Behavioral. We also completed construction and began
recording rental income on a €46 million (approximately $49.0 million) general acute care facility located in Spain that is leased to
IMED.

91
2023 Activity
During 2023, we completed construction and began recording rental income on one inpatient rehabilitation facility located in
Lexington, South Carolina, which commenced rent on July 1, 2023, and another inpatient rehabilitation facility located in Stockton,
California, which commenced rent on May 1, 2023. Both of these facilities are leased to Ernest Health, Inc. ("Ernest") pursuant to an
existing long-term master lease.
2022 Activity
During 2022, we completed construction and began recording rental income on an inpatient rehabilitation facility located in
Bakersfield, California. This facility commenced rent on March 1, 2022 and is leased to Ernest pursuant to an existing long-term
master lease.
Disposals
2024 Activity
During 2024, we had the following disposal activities:
•
See Utah Transaction above for a discussion of the five Utah hospitals sold on April 12, 2024.
•
On April 9, 2024, we sold five properties to Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. ("Prime") for total proceeds of approximately
$250 million along with a $100 million interest-bearing mortgage loan (which was fully repaid on August 29, 2024). This
transaction resulted in a gain on real estate of approximately $53 million, partially offset by a non-cash straight-line rent
write-off of approximately $30 million. As part of this sale transaction, we extended the lease maturity of four other
facilities with Prime to 2044. This amended lease has inflation-based escalators, collared between 2% and 4%, and a
purchase option on or prior to August 26, 2028 for a value of $238 million, which is greater than our net book value for
these properties at December 31, 2024. After August 26, 2028, this option price reverts to $260 million (subject to annual
escalations).
•
On July 23, 2024, we sold the 50-bed Arizona General Hospital in Mesa, Arizona and seven freestanding emergency
departments to Dignity Health ("Dignity") for $160 million. This sale resulted in a gain on real estate of approximately
$85 million, partially offset by a non-cash straight-line rent write-off of approximately $20 million.
•
On August 14, 2024, we sold 11 freestanding emergency departments to UCHealth for $86 million. This sale resulted in a
gain on real estate of approximately $40 million, partially offset by a non-cash straight-line rent write-off of
approximately $16 million.
•
As a result of the Company’s global settlement with Steward Health Care System ("Steward") approved by the bankruptcy
court on September 18, 2024 (as discussed further under "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" under this same Note 3), we
consented to the sale of three facilities located in Florida ("Space Coast" properties) to Orlando Health, which closed on
October 23, 2024. In accordance with the terms of the global settlement, the Steward bankruptcy estate retained $395
million of the approximately $440 million total proceeds, and we recognized an approximate $2 million gain in the fourth
quarter of 2024.
•
In the third quarter of 2024, Pajaro Valley Healthcare District Corporation notified us of their intent to exercise their
purchase option on the Watsonville facility. This transaction, which closed on October 31, 2024, resulted in cash proceeds
of approximately $40 million and an approximate $4 million gain.
•
During 2024, we also completed the sale of six other facilities and two ancillary facilities for approximately $14 million.

92
Summary of Operations for Disposed (or to be Disposed) Assets in 2024
The following represents the operating results from properties sold for 2024 and properties designated as held for sale at
December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
For the Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Revenues(1)...................................................................................................... $
72,362
$
88,938
$
220,183
Real estate depreciation and amortization(2)...................................................
(26,476)
(331,099)
(53,350)
Property-related expenses ................................................................................
(8,277)
(4,697)
(1,759)
Real estate impairment charges(3)...................................................................
(129,159)
—
—
Other (expense) income(4)...............................................................................
480,416
(90)
(19)
(Loss) income from real estate dispositions, net.......................................... $
388,866
$
(246,948)
$
165,055
(1)
The 2023 column includes an approximate $95 million write-off of straight-line rent receivables related to the hospital
operations of the five Utah facilities that were acquired by CommonSpirit on May 1, 2023.
(2)
The 2023 column includes approximately $286 million of lease intangible amortization acceleration related to the hospital
operations of the five Utah facilities that were acquired by CommonSpirit on May 1, 2023.
(3)
Includes the charge associated with the three Space Coast facilities in the third quarter of 2024 due to the global settlement
reached with Steward and its lenders.
(4)
The 2024 column includes approximately $24 million of gains (net of approximately $16 million write-off of straight line
receivables) related to the UCHealth disposal and $65 million of gains (net of approximately $20 million write-off of
straight-line rent receivables) related to the Dignity disposal. In addition, the 2024 column includes $360 million of gains
(net of approximately $20 million write-off of straight-line rent receivables) related to the Utah Transaction and $23
million of gains (net of $30 million write-off of straight-line rent receivables) related to the sale of five Prime properties.
2023 Activity
On March 30, 2023, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our 11 general acute care facilities located in Australia and
operated by Healthscope Ltd. ("Healthscope") (the "Australia Transaction") to affiliates of HMC Capital for cash proceeds of
approximately A$1.2 billion. As a result, we designated the Australian portfolio as held for sale in the first quarter of 2023 and
recorded approximately $79 million of net impairment charges at that time, which included $37.4 million of straight-line rent
receivable write-offs and approximately $8 million in fees to sell the hospitals, partially offset by approximately $16 million of gains
from our interest rate swap and foreign currency translation amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income that were
reclassified to earnings in 2023 as part of the transaction. This transaction closed in two phases. The first phase closed on May 18,
2023, in which we sold seven of the 11 facilities for A$730 million, and the final phase closed on October 10, 2023, in which we sold
the remaining four facilities for approximately A$470 million.
On March 8, 2023, we received notice that Prime planned to exercise its right to repurchase from us the real estate associated
with one master lease for approximately $100 million. As such, we recorded an approximate $11 million impairment charge in the
first quarter of 2023 related to non-cash rent receivables on the three facilities that were sold on July 11, 2023.
2022 Activity
On March 14, 2022, we completed the previously described partnership with Macquarie, in which we sold the real estate of
eight Massachusetts-based general acute care hospitals, with a fair value of approximately $1.7 billion. See "New Investments" in this
same Note 3 for further details on this transaction.
During 2022, we also completed the sale of 15 other facilities (including 11 properties sold on September 1, 2022 to Prime for
proceeds of $366 million) and five ancillary properties for total proceeds of approximately $522 million and recognized a gain on the
sale of real estate of approximately $100 million, along with a $42 million write-off of straight-line rent receivables due to the early
termination of certain properties' expected lease terms.
Intangible Assets
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, our intangible lease assets were $0.8 billion ($0.6 billion, net of accumulated amortization)
and $1.0 billion ($0.9 billion, net of accumulated amortization), respectively.

93
We recorded amortization expense related to intangible lease assets of $205.6 million (including $170 million for accelerating
the amortization of the in-place lease intangibles associated with two master leases, including the Steward master lease that was
terminated effective September 11, 2024), $332.5 million (including $286 million for accelerating the amortization of the in-place
lease intangibles related to re-leasing the Utah properties to CommonSpirit as described in this same Note 3), and $55.9 million in
2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, and expect to recognize amortization expense from existing lease intangible assets as follows
(amounts in thousands):
For the Year Ended December 31:
2025 .....................................................................................................................................................................
$
29,201
2026 .....................................................................................................................................................................
29,052
2027 .....................................................................................................................................................................
28,730
2028 .....................................................................................................................................................................
28,566
2029 .....................................................................................................................................................................
26,726
As of December 31, 2024, capitalized lease intangibles have a weighted-average remaining life of 23.5 years.
Leasing Operations (Lessor)
We acquire and develop healthcare facilities and lease the facilities to healthcare operating companies. The initial fixed lease
terms of these infrastructure-type assets are typically at least 15 years, and most include renewal options at the election of our tenants,
generally in five year increments. Over 99% of our leases provide annual rent escalations based on increases in the CPI (or similar
indices outside the U.S.) and/or fixed minimum annual rent escalations. Many of our domestic leases contain purchase options with
pricing set at various terms but in no case less than our total initial investment. Our leases typically require the tenant to handle and
bear most of the costs associated with our properties including repair/maintenance, property taxes, and insurance.
The following table summarizes total future contractual minimum lease payments, excluding operating expense
reimbursements, tenant recoveries, and other lease/loan-related adjustments to revenue (i.e., straight-line rents, deferred revenues, or
reserves/write-offs), from tenants under noncancelable leases as of December 31, 2024 (amounts in thousands):
Total Under
Operating Leases
Total Under
Financing Leases
Total
2025 ....................................................................................................
$
721,305
$
118,855
$
840,160
2026 ....................................................................................................
810,002
121,289
931,291
2027 ....................................................................................................
856,426
123,772
980,198
2028 ....................................................................................................
868,390
126,304
994,694
2029 ....................................................................................................
869,681
128,887
998,568
Thereafter ...........................................................................................
20,744,147
3,075,567
23,819,714
$
24,869,951
$
3,694,674
$
28,564,625
For all of our properties subject to lease, we are the legal owner of the property and the tenant's right to use and possess such
property is guided by the terms of a lease. At December 31, 2024, we account for all of these leases as operating leases, except where
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires alternative classification, including leases on 13 Ernest facilities that are
accounted for as DFLs and leases on nine of our Prospect facilities and five of our Ernest facilities that are accounted for as a
financing. The components of our total investment in financing leases consisted of the following (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
Minimum lease payments receivable.....................................................................
$
591,142
$
611,669
Estimated unguaranteed residual values................................................................
203,818
203,818
Less: Unearned income and allowance for credit loss...........................................
(547,770)
(571,059)
Net investment in direct financing leases ..........................................................
247,190
244,428
Other financing leases (net of allowance for credit loss) ......................................
810,580
987,202
Total investment in financing leases..................................................................
$
1,057,770
$
1,231,630

94
Other Leasing Activities
At December 31, 2024, our vacant properties represent less than 1% of total assets. We are in various stages of either re-leasing
or selling these vacant properties.
Our tenants’ financial performance and resulting ability to satisfy their lease and loan obligations to us are material to our
financial results and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders. Our tenants operate in the healthcare
industry, which is highly regulated, and changes in regulation (or delays in enacting regulation) may temporarily impact our tenants’
operations until they are able to make the appropriate adjustments to their business. In addition, our tenants may experience
operational challenges from time-to-time as a result of many factors, including those external to them, such as cybersecurity attacks,
public health crises, economic issues resulting in high inflation and spikes in labor costs, extreme or severe weather and climate-
related events, and adverse market and political conditions. We monitor our tenants' operating results and the potential impact from
these challenges. We may elect to provide support to our tenants from time-to-time in the form of short-term rent deferrals to be paid
back in full, or in the form of temporary loans. See below for an update on some of our tenants.
Steward Health Care System
As discussed in previous filings, Steward experienced significant operational and liquidity challenges that led to rent payment
shortfalls in the 2023 fourth quarter and our decision to move to the cash basis of accounting effective December 31, 2023. Steward's
business worsened in 2024, and they ultimately filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 6, 2024 with the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas. On September 11, 2024, the bankruptcy court entered an interim order, subsequently made
final on September 18, 2024, approving a global settlement between Steward, its lenders, the unsecured creditors committee, and the
Company. The order provided for the following: a) termination of our master lease with Steward; b) the release of claims against 23 of
our properties (including the release of claims by the secured lender over its liens on equipment, inventory, and licenses), allowing us
to begin the process of re-tenanting or selling these properties; and c) a full release of claims against us from all parties. In return, we
consented to the sale of the operations and our real estate in three facilities in the Space Coast region of Florida, along with a full
release of our claims in Steward including claims to past due rent and interest, outstanding loans, and our equity investment. The three
Space Coast facilities were sold in October 2024, and we received $47 million, with the remaining proceeds going to Steward in
accordance with the global settlement.
In regard to our real estate partnership with Macquarie that owned and leased eight properties in Massachusetts to Steward, the
bankruptcy court approved the termination of the master lease with Steward during the 2024 third quarter. We and Macquarie entered
into an agreement with the mortgage lender of the joint venture to transition the eight properties to them along with cash proceeds of
approximately $40 million (representing our share), in return for full payment of the underlying mortgage debt and a release of claims
against each party.
With this global settlement and termination of the joint venture master lease, our relationship with Steward effectively ended.
Impairment Charges
Due to the events discussed above, we recorded various impairment charges during 2024 and 2023, which included the
following (in millions):
For the Years Ended December 31,
Description
2024
2023
Income Statement
Classification
Reserve for unpaid rent and interest and straight-line
rent receivables ......................................................... $
—
$
413
Total revenues
Working capital and other loans(1)..............................
787
—
Real estate and other
impairment charges, net
Investment in Massachusetts partnership(2)................
445
30
(Loss) earnings from
equity interests
Real estate(2) ...............................................................
277
100
Real estate and other
impairment charges, net
Equity investment and other(1)....................................
54
171
Real estate and other
impairment charges, net
Total ........................................................................... $
1,563
$
714
(1)
For our non-real estate investments in Steward, we compared our carrying value of all such investments to the fair value
of the underlying collateral, which was no value after the global settlement and our release of claims against Steward as
discussed above.

95
(2)
The three Space Coast properties and certain excess properties previously leased to Steward were deemed held for sale in
the 2024 third quarter. We recognized a real estate impairment charge of approximately $180 million to adjust our net
book value to align with fair value less cost to sell based on expected proceeds, including from a binding agreement for
the Space Coast properties. For the other real estate held for use, we made a comparison of the projected undiscounted
future cash flows with the net book value of each asset. For those properties where the carrying value was deemed not
recoverable, we recorded an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value to its estimated fair value. For the real estate
in the Massachusetts partnership, there was no fair value as we transitioned those properties to the mortgage lender to
satisfy the mortgage debt. For the remaining properties (less than 10 in total in 2024 and 2023), we, along with assistance
from a third-party, independent valuation firm, estimated fair value using a combination of cost, market, and income
approaches using Level 3 inputs. The cost approach used comparable sales to value the land and cost manuals to value the
improvements. The value derived from the market approach was based on sale prices of similar properties. For the income
approach, we divided the expected operating income (rent revenue less expenses, if any) from the property by a market
capitalization rate (range from 8% to 10%).
In addition with the lease termination discussed above, we fully amortized the related in-place lease intangibles resulting in
$149 million of amortization expense in 2024 as reflected in the real estate depreciation and amortization line of our consolidated
statements of net income.
Re-tenanting Activity
Subsequent to the release of claims on the 23 properties as part of the global settlement, we reached definitive agreements with
six operators (Healthcare Systems of America, Honor Health, Insight Health, Quorum Health, College Health, and Tenor Health) to
lease 18 of these facilities in 2024 and early 2025. As of December 31, 2024, we have provided less than $100 million in short-term
working capital loans to these operators. As of January 2025, we have started receiving partial cash rental payments from the re-
tenanted portfolio, and based on our lease contracts, rent payments are ramped up to approximately 57% of contractual rent by the
fourth quarter of 2025, 78% of contractual rent by second quarter 2026, and 100% of contractual rent by year end 2026. Excluding the
two developments, the remaining three former Steward properties (with a net book value of less than 1% of our total assets) are in
various stages of being re-tenanted or sold.
Other Activity
During 2024, we received and recorded rent and interest revenue from Steward of $40 million for the year ended December 31,
2024. In addition, we were benefited from rent paid by Steward to the Massachusetts joint venture of $76 million ($38 million
representing our share) for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Prospect
We lease real estate assets to Prospect in California and Connecticut (for which we account for as financing leases), have a
mortgage loan secured by four properties operated by Prospect in Pennsylvania, and have a $75 million asset-backed loan outstanding.
In addition, in connection with the Prospect Transaction in May 2023, we acquired a non-controlling investment in PHP Holdings.
In recent periods, Prospect’s operating losses in multiple East Coast markets, including Pennsylvania and Rhode Island (a state
in which we have no investment), have adversely impacted Prospect’s overall liquidity. Starting January 1, 2023, we began accounting
for our leases and loans to Prospect on a cash basis. In 2024, we recognized approximately $25 million of revenue representing cash
received for rents on our California properties. In addition, we received and recorded approximately $3.8 million of interest on the $75
million asset-backed loan. However, Prospect has not made any scheduled rent or interest payments since the second quarter of 2024.
In comparison, we recognized approximately $96 million of revenue in 2023, including $14 million received in cash and $82 million
was recorded as part of the Prospect Transaction, in which we received additional monetizable investments in PHP Holdings, in lieu of
cash for rent and interest owed.
On October 5, 2022, we entered into definitive agreements to sell three Prospect facilities located in Connecticut to Yale in a
transaction for which we are contractually entitled to receive $355 million at closing. In addition, on November 8, 2024, Astrana
Health entered into a binding agreement to purchase the majority of PHP Holdings, pursuant to which we are contractually entitled to
receive a portion of the proceeds.
Due to its ongoing operational and liquidity challenges, Prospect filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 11, 2025 with the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. Prospect’s bankruptcy filing constitutes a default under the terms
of our master leases and loan agreements with Prospect, and imposes a stay on our ability to exercise contractual rights with respect to
these defaults. The bankruptcy filing bars us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from Prospect unless we receive an order
permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. While we have engaged in negotiations with Prospect and other stakeholders and
have reached a tentative agreement with Prospect, the outcome of any such negotiations and remedies is uncertain at this time and will

96
be subject in all cases to the approval of the bankruptcy court. In addition, there is a risk that parties may seek to bring claims against
us in Prospect’s bankruptcy proceeding.
The bankruptcy court has the power to approve and direct the sale of Prospect’s real estate free and clear of any associated
mortgages and loans, whether or not there are sufficient net proceeds to repay them, in whole or in part. As a result, we may recover
none or substantially less than the full value of our claims. In addition, the bankruptcy process related proceedings may negatively
impact the sale of the three Connecticut facilities to Yale as planned, and our ability to receive the full amount of proceeds we are
contractually entitled to receive from the sale of PHP Holdings and the repayment of our asset-backed loan.
Due to the events discussed above, we recorded more than $400 million of impairment charges and negative fair value
adjustments associated with our investments in Prospect in the 2024 fourth quarter. With these charges, we have fully reserved for the
asset-backed loan and our Pennsylvania mortgage loan and have decreased the value in our Connecticut properties. No charge was
recorded on our California properties. In determining the impairment charges needed for these investments, we compared the carrying
value of such investment to the fair value of the underlying collateral (which includes real estate assets) less cost to sell, and factored
in the priority of claims associated with the bankruptcy. In estimating the fair value of the real estate, we, along with assistance from a
third-party, independent valuation firm, used a combination of cost, market, and income approaches using Level 3 inputs. The cost
approach used comparable sales to value the land and cost manuals to value the improvements. The value derived from the market
approach was based on sale prices of similar properties. For the income approach, we divided the expected operating income from the
property by a market capitalization rate (range from 8.25% to 8.5%).
In regard to our investment in PHP Holdings, we account for this investment (both the equity investment and convertible loan)
using the fair value option method. Each quarter, we mark such investment to fair value as more fully described in Note 10 to the
consolidated financial statements. In the fourth quarter of 2024 (and as part of the total $400 million of charges noted above), we
recorded an approximate $50 million negative fair value adjustment. This charge is in addition to the $498 million of negative fair
value adjustments made through the first nine months of 2024, resulted in approximately $150 million remaining value at December
31, 2024. These adjustments in 2024 were made based on the binding purchase agreement with Astrana Health, along with
consultations with a third-party, independent valuation firm.
Prospect is early in its bankruptcy proceedings and the ultimate outcome of such proceedings is uncertain. At this time, we are
unable to predict the timing of any of the foregoing matters or the timing for a resolution of the Prospect bankruptcy proceeding. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to recover or preserve the remaining approximately $835 million of our investments in Prospect
and PHP Holdings in whole or in part.
International Joint Venture
As discussed in previous filings, we placed our loan to the international joint venture on the cash basis of accounting in 2023, as
we determined that it was no longer probable that the borrower would pay its future interest in full. This loan, accounted for under the
fair value option method, was collateralized by the equity of Steward held by an investor in both Steward and the international joint
venture. Consistent with the discussion above on non-real estate investments in Steward, we recorded a $225 million unfavorable fair
value adjustment in the 2024 first quarter to fully reserve for the loan and related equity investment. These investments, which are
included in “Investments in unconsolidated operating entities” on our consolidated balance sheets, were adjusted for after comparing
our carrying value to an updated fair value analysis of the underlying collateral, with assistance from a third-party, independent
valuation firm.
CommonSpirit
On May 1, 2023, Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado ("CHIC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CommonSpirit, acquired the
Utah hospital operations of five general acute care facilities previously operated by Steward. The new lease, at the time, for these Utah
assets had an initial fixed term of 15 years with annual escalation provisions. As part of this transaction, we severed these facilities
from the master lease with Steward, and accordingly accelerated the amortization of the associated in-place lease intangibles
(approximately $286 million) and wrote-off approximately $95 million of straight-line rent receivables related to the former lease. As
described earlier, these five properties make up the Utah Transaction.

97
Pipeline Health System
On October 2, 2022, Pipeline Health System ("Pipeline") filed for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 protection of the
United States Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of Texas, while keeping its hospitals open to continue providing care to the
communities served. On February 6, 2023, Pipeline emerged from bankruptcy. Per the bankruptcy settlement, Pipeline's lease of our
California assets remained in place, and we were repaid on February 7, 2023, for all rent that was outstanding at December 31, 2022,
along with what was due for the first quarter of 2023. As part of the settlement, we deferred approximately $6 million of rent in 2023
to be paid with interest. As of December 31, 2024, Pipeline is current on their monthly base rent obligations per the terms of the lease,
and we hold a rent deposit that more than covers the remaining $5 million of unpaid deferred rent.
Other Tenant Matters
In the 2023 third quarter, we moved to cash basis of accounting for a tenant that comprised approximately 1% of our total assets
due to declines in operating results. As a result, we recorded a $49 million charge to reserve billed and straight-line rent receivables.
During the 2024 third quarter, we terminated the lease with this tenant, resulting in the acceleration of lease intangible amortization of
$22 million. On December 31, 2024, we entered into a forbearance and restructuring agreement with the former tenant. This
forbearance and restructuring agreement was then amended on February 28, 2025 to, among other things, give the former tenant more
time to complete its third-party financing which is scheduled to be completed in the 2025 first quarter. The substantive terms of the
amended forbearance and restructuring agreement include the: repayment of $10 million of unpaid rent in cash, which we received on
December 31, 2024; acquisition by this former tenant of certain of our facilities (with a net book value of approximately $39 million)
for approximately $45 million (of which $10 million will be in the form of a secured loan), one of which closed in early January 2025
for approximately $3 million (and we received payment in full); repayment of a mortgage loan; and entering into a new 20 year triple-
net lease agreement of three properties with a net book value of approximately $156 million.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
Our primary business strategy is to acquire real estate and lease to providers of healthcare services. Typically, we directly own
100% of such investments. However, from time-to-time, we will co-invest with other investors that share a similar view that hospital
real estate is a necessary infrastructure-type asset in communities. In these types of investments, we will own undivided interests of
less than 100% of the real estate through unconsolidated real estate joint ventures. The underlying real estate and leases in these
unconsolidated real estate joint ventures are generally structured similarly and carry a similar risk profile to the rest of our real estate
portfolio.
The following is a summary of our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures by operator (amounts in thousands):
Operator
Ownership Percentage
As of December 31,
2024
As of December 31,
2023
Swiss Medical Network ...................................................................
70%
$
483,770
$
472,434
MEDIAN..........................................................................................
50%
431,964
471,336
CommonSpirit (Utah partnership)....................................................
25%
113,202
—
Policlinico di Monza ........................................................................
50%
77,592
80,562
HM Hospitales .................................................................................
45%
49,869
56,071
Steward (Macquarie partnership).....................................................
50%
—
394,052
Total ...............................................................................................
$
1,156,397
$
1,474,455
The decrease in our total investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures since December 31, 2023, is primarily due to
the impairment recorded to our Massachusetts-based partnership with Macquarie in the second quarter of 2024 as more fully described
above in this same Note 3. In the third quarter of 2024, we and the other equity owners funded capital contributions (our share being
approximately $40 million) to the Swiss Medical Network investment, proceeds of which were used to pay off debt inside the joint
venture. As discussed previously, we acquired a 25% interest in the Utah partnership in the 2024 second quarter as part of the Utah
Transaction.
For 2024 and 2023, we received $45 million and $69 million, respectively, in dividends from these real estate joint ventures.
Investments in Unconsolidated Operating Entities
Our investments in unconsolidated operating entities are noncontrolling investments that are typically made in conjunction with
larger real estate transactions in which the operators are vetted as part of our overall underwriting process. In many cases, we would

98
not be able to acquire the larger real estate portfolio without such investments in operators. These investments also offer the
opportunity to enhance our overall return and provide for certain minority rights and protections.
The following is a summary of our investments in unconsolidated operating entities (amounts in thousands):
Operator
As of December 31,
2024
As of December 31,
2023
Swiss Medical Network .................................................................................................
$
172,453
$
186,113
PHP Holdings.................................................................................................................
149,027
699,535
Aevis Victoria SA ("Aevis") ..........................................................................................
63,409
77,345
Priory..............................................................................................................................
38,739
163,837
Aspris Children's Services ("Aspris") ............................................................................
15,950
15,986
Steward (loan investment)..............................................................................................
—
361,591
International joint venture ..............................................................................................
—
225,960
Steward (equity investment)...........................................................................................
—
35,696
Lifepoint Behavioral ......................................................................................................
—
11,429
Caremax .........................................................................................................................
—
1,148
Total .............................................................................................................................
$
439,578
$
1,778,640
See "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" under this same Note 3 for details behind the change from 2023 to 2024 in our Steward
investments (loan and equity).
For our investments marked to fair value (including our investments in PHP Holdings, Aevis, Caremax, and the international
joint venture), we recorded approximately $794 million in unfavorable non-cash fair value adjustments during 2024; whereas, this was
an approximately $45 million favorable non-cash fair value adjustments during 2023. The amount recorded in 2024 includes an
approximate $550 million unfavorable fair market value adjustment to our investment in PHP Holdings, as further described in the
"Prospect" subheading of this Note 3 and included in the "Other (including fair value adjustments on securities)" line of the
consolidated statements of net income. In addition, we recorded a $225 million unfavorable fair value adjustment in the 2024 first
quarter related to our international joint venture investments as described in Note 3 and included in the "Real estate and other
impairment charges, net" line of the consolidated statements of net income. The $45 million favorable fair market value adjustment in
2023 primarily related to PHP Holdings and an approximate CHF 20 million favorable adjustment to our investment in Swiss Medical
Network, partially offset by decreases in value from marking other securities to market, including our equity investment in the
international joint venture.
In the first quarter of 2024, we sold our interest in the Priory syndicated term loan for £90 million (approximately $115 million),
resulting in an approximate £6 million ($7.8 million) economic loss. In addition, we sold our remaining minority equity investment in
Lifepoint Behavioral in the 2024 first quarter.
Other Investment Activities
In the third quarter of 2023, we invested approximately $105 million for a participation in Steward's syndicated asset-backed
credit facility, and we loaned an additional $40 million. On August 17, 2023, we sold the $105 million interest to a global asset
manager for approximately $100 million, and Steward paid approximately $2 million on November 3, 2023. The remainder was
written off as part of the $425 million loan impairment charge in the 2024 third quarter as discussed in the "Leasing Operations
(Lessor)" section of this same Note 3.
In the second quarter of 2023, we received repayment of the CHF 60 million mortgage loan from Infracore that was originally
made in the fourth quarter of 2022.

99
Concentrations of Credit Risks
We monitor concentration risk in several ways due to the nature of our real estate assets that are vital to the communities in
which they are located and given our history of being able to replace inefficient operators of our facilities, if needed, with more
effective operators. See below for our concentration details (dollars in thousands):
Total Assets by Operator
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
Operators
Total Assets (1)
Percentage of
Total Assets
Total Assets (1)
Percentage of
Total Assets
Circle............................................................... $
2,026,778
14.2% $
2,119,392
11.6%
Priory...............................................................
1,233,462
8.6%
1,391,005
7.6%
Healthcare Systems of America......................
1,187,006
8.3%
—
—
Lifepoint Behavioral .......................................
813,584
5.7%
813,527
4.4%
Swiss Medical Network ..................................
719,632
5.1%
735,891
4.0%
Steward............................................................
—
—
3,518,537
19.2%
Other operators................................................
6,624,256
46.3%
7,709,095
42.2%
Other assets .....................................................
1,689,876
(2)
11.8%
2,017,397
(2)
11.0%
Total ............................................................ $
14,294,594
100.0% $
18,304,844
100.0%
(1)
Total assets by operator are generally comprised of real estate assets, mortgage loans, investments in unconsolidated real
estate joint ventures, investments in unconsolidated operating entities, and other loans.
(2)
Includes our investment in PHP Holdings of approximately $150 million and $700 million as of December 31, 2024 and
2023, respectively — see Prospect Transaction and tenant update described previously in this same Note 3 for more
information.
Total Assets by U.S. State and Country (1)
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
U.S. States and Other Countries
Total Assets
Percentage of
Total Assets
Total Assets
Percentage of
Total Assets
Texas ............................................................................... $
1,394,296
9.8% $
1,891,482
10.3%
California ........................................................................
935,470
6.4%
1,252,674
6.8%
Florida .............................................................................
840,876
5.9%
1,348,210
7.4%
Arizona............................................................................
379,801
2.7%
547,789
3.0%
Ohio.................................................................................
327,577
2.3%
349,140
1.9%
All other states ................................................................
2,636,587
18.5%
4,385,814
24.0%
Other domestic assets......................................................
951,486
6.6%
1,397,170
7.6%
Total U.S. ...................................................................... $
7,466,093
52.2% $
11,172,279
61.0%
United Kingdom.............................................................. $
3,985,672
27.9% $
4,261,944
23.3%
Switzerland......................................................................
719,632
5.0%
735,891
4.0%
Germany..........................................................................
672,343
4.7%
734,630
4.0%
Spain................................................................................
247,996
1.7%
252,529
1.4%
Finland ............................................................................
199,721
1.4%
218,322
1.2%
All other countries...........................................................
264,747
1.9%
309,022
1.7%
Other international assets................................................
738,390
5.2%
620,227
3.4%
Total international......................................................... $
6,828,501
47.8% $
7,132,565
39.0%
Grand total................................................................... $
14,294,594
100.0% $
18,304,844
100.0%

100
Total Assets by Facility Type (1)
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
Facility Types
Total Assets
Percentage of
Total Assets
Total Assets
Percentage of
Total Assets
General acute care hospitals .............................................. $
8,493,331
59.4% $
11,764,151
64.3%
Behavioral health facilities ................................................
2,376,460
16.7%
2,576,983
14.1%
Post acute care facilities.....................................................
1,617,596
11.3%
1,716,248
9.4%
Freestanding ER/urgent care facilities...............................
117,331
0.8%
230,065
1.2%
Other assets........................................................................
1,689,876
11.8%
2,017,397
11.0%
Total............................................................................... $
14,294,594
100.0% $
18,304,844
100.0%
(1)
For geographic and facility type concentration metrics in the tables above, we allocate our investments in unconsolidated
operating entities pro rata based on the gross book value of the real estate. Such pro rata allocations are subject to change
from period to period.
On an individual property basis, our largest investment in any single property was approximately 2% of our total assets as of
December 31, 2024.
On a revenue basis, concentration for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the two prior years is as follows:
The following shows those tenants that represented 10% or more of our total revenues by year (in thousands):
2024
Operator
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
Circle ..................................................................
$
205,582
20.7%
Priory..................................................................
101,675
10.2%
2023
Operator
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
Circle ..................................................................
$
194,390
22.3%
Priory..................................................................
107,557
12.3%
2022
Operator
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
Steward...............................................................
$
427,912
27.7%
Circle ..................................................................
189,565
12.3%
Prospect ..............................................................
169,335
11.0%
Total Revenues by Geographic Location
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Geographic Location
Total
Revenues
Percentage of
Total
Revenues
Total
Revenues
Percentage of
Total
Revenues
Total
Revenues
Percentage of
Total
Revenues
Total U.S................................................ $
561,673
56.4% $
407,329
46.7% $ 1,096,465
71.1%
United Kingdom ....................................
359,991
36.2%
352,594
40.4%
317,013
20.5%
All other countries .................................
73,883
7.4%
111,876
12.9%
129,373
8.4%
Grand total ......................................... $
995,547
100.0% $
871,799
100.0% $ 1,542,851
100.0%

101
Total Revenues by Facility Type
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Facility Types
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
Total Revenues
Percentage of
Total Revenues
General acute care hospitals.... $
628,622
63.1% $
541,888
62.2% $
1,167,233
75.7%
Behavioral health facilities......
209,668
21.1%
213,292
24.5%
204,420
13.2%
Post acute care facilities ..........
139,859
14.0%
92,787
10.6%
146,780
9.5%
Freestanding ER/urgent care
facilities ................................
17,398
1.8%
23,832
2.7%
24,418
1.6%
Total ...................................... $
995,547
100.0% $
871,799
100.0% $
1,542,851
100.0%
Related Party Transactions
Revenues earned from tenants and real estate joint ventures in which we had an equity interest (accounted for under either the
equity or fair value option methods) during the year were $33.9 million, $83.0 million, and $135.5 million for 2024, 2023, and 2022,
respectively.
4. Debt
The following is a summary of debt (dollar amounts in thousands):
As of December 31,
2024
As of December 31,
2023
Revolving credit facility(A) ..............................................................................................
$
361,726
$
1,514,420
Term loan ..........................................................................................................................
200,000
200,000
British pound sterling secured term loan due 2024(B) .....................................................
—
133,484
Australian term loan facility(B) ........................................................................................
—
320,164
British pound sterling term loan due 2025(B)...................................................................
617,039
891,170
British pound sterling secured term loan due 2034(B) .....................................................
790,234
—
3.325% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025(B)..................................................................
517,700
551,950
0.993% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026(B)..................................................................
517,700
551,950
2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026(B)..................................................................
625,800
636,550
5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026.......................................................................
500,000
500,000
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027.......................................................................
1,400,000
1,400,000
3.692% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028(B)..................................................................
750,960
763,860
4.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2029.......................................................................
900,000
900,000
3.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2030(B)..................................................................
438,060
445,585
3.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2031.......................................................................
1,300,000
1,300,000
$
8,919,219
$
10,109,133
Debt issue costs and discount, net.....................................................................................
(71,107)
(44,897)
$
8,848,112
$
10,064,236
(A)
Includes £- million and £322 million of GBP-denominated borrowings and €303 million and €303 million of Euro-denominated
borrowings that reflect the applicable exchange rates at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
(B)
Non-U.S. dollar denominated debt that reflects the exchange rates at period-end.
As of December 31, 2024, principal payments due on our debt (which exclude the effects of any discounts, premiums, or debt
issue costs recorded) are as follows (amounts in thousands):
2025 ..........................................................................................................................................................
$
1,134,739
2026 ..........................................................................................................................................................
2,005,226
2027 ..........................................................................................................................................................
1,600,000
2028 ..........................................................................................................................................................
750,960
2029 ..........................................................................................................................................................
900,000
Thereafter..................................................................................................................................................
2,528,294
Total........................................................................................................................................................
$
8,919,219

102
2024 Activity
During 2024, we closed on a term loan with an aggregate principal amount of approximately £631 million (approximately $800
million) secured by a portfolio of properties in the U.K. We used the majority of the net proceeds of the facility to pay down our
revolving credit facility by $375 million and British pound sterling term loan due 2025 by £105 million, and to pay off our British
pound sterling secured term loan due 2024 (approximately £105 million). During the year, we also paid down an additional $756
million on our revolving credit facility and £102 million on our British pound sterling term loan due 2025 with cash proceeds from
asset sales. In addition, on April 18, 2024, we paid off and terminated the remainder of the A$470 million (approximately $306
million) Australian term loan facility with proceeds from the Utah Transaction described in Note 3.
2023 Activity
During 2023, we paid down, prior to maturity, A$730 million (approximately $475 million) of the A$1.2 billion Australian term
loan with proceeds from the Australia Transaction as discussed in Note 3. In addition, we purchased approximately £50 million of our
2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 at a discounted price and yield averaging approximately 13%. As a result of this
prepayment, we realized an approximate $1.1 million gain. On December 5, 2023, we fully paid off the remaining £350 million
balance of our 2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 with cash on-hand and proceeds from the revolving portion of our credit
facility ("Credit Facility").
Credit Facility
We have a multi-currency denominated revolver and a $200 million term loan that make up our Credit Facility. Prior to a series
of amendments in 2024 (discussed below), maximum borrowings under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility was $1.8 billion.
Prior to the 2024 amendments and at our election, loans were made as either alternate base rate loans ("ABR Loans") or loans
for an interest period of either one, three, or six months ("Term Benchmark Loans"). The applicable margin for term loans that were
ABR Loans was adjustable on a sliding scale from 0.00% to 0.70% based on current credit rating. The applicable margin for term
loans that were Term Benchmark Loans was adjustable on a sliding scale from 0.875% to 1.70% based on current credit rating. The
applicable margin for revolving loans that were ABR Loans was adjustable on a sliding scale from 0.00% to 0.50% based on current
credit rating. The applicable margin for revolving loans that were Term Benchmark Loans or risk-free rate loans ("RFR Loans"), as
defined in the Credit Facility agreement, was adjustable on a sliding scale from 0.80% to 1.50% based on current credit rating. The
facility fee was adjustable on a sliding scale from 0.125% to 0.30% based on current credit rating and was payable on the revolving
loan facility. During 2023, our credit rating negatively changed, resulting in adjustments to the applicable margin by 0.375% and an
increase to the facility fee from 0.25% to 0.30%.
On April 12, 2024, we amended our Credit Facility and certain other agreements to (i) reduce revolving commitments from $1.8
billion to $1.4 billion, (ii) apply certain proceeds from asset sales and debt transactions to repay the Australian term loan facility and
certain other outstanding obligations, including revolving loans under the Credit Facility to the extent necessary to reduce the
outstanding borrowings to no more than the amended $1.4 billion commitment, and (iii) amend or waive certain covenants to our
Credit Facility and British pound sterling term loan due 2025 as described under "Covenants" in this same Note 4.
On August 6, 2024, we amended the Credit Facility and the British pound sterling term loan due 2025 to (i) further reduce
revolving commitments in the Credit Facility from $1.4 billion to $1.28 billion, (ii) increase borrowing spreads to 300 basis points
during the Modified Covenant Period (defined in "Covenants" section in this same Note 4) and then to 225 basis points after the
Modified Covenant Period, (iii) require that proceeds of certain future asset sales and debt transactions (during the Modified Covenant
Period) be applied to repay certain outstanding obligations, including our revolving loans (by 15% of such proceeds but for which the
revolving loans can be reborrowed) and our British pound sterling term loan due 2025 (by 50% of such proceeds), and (iv) amend or
waive certain covenants as described under "Covenants" in this same Note 4.
At December 31, 2024, we had $0.4 billion outstanding on the revolver, whereas, we had $1.5 billion outstanding on our
revolver at December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, our availability under our revolver was $0.9 billion and $0.3 billion,
respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on the revolver was 6.6% and 5.9% during 2024 and 2023, respectively.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the interest rate in effect on our term loan was 7.5% and 7.2%, respectively.
Non-U.S. Term Loans
British Pound Sterling Secured Term Loan due 2034
On May 24, 2024, we completed a secured loan facility with a consortium of institutional investors that provides for a term loan
in aggregate principal amount of approximately £631 million (approximately $800 million) secured by a portfolio of 27 properties

103
located in the U.K. currently leased to affiliates of Circle. The facility carries a fixed rate of 6.877% over its 10-year term, excluding
fees and expenses, and is interest-only (payable quarterly in advance) through the maturity date. The facility is secured by first priority
mortgages or similar security instruments on the relevant properties, including assignments of rents and security over accounts, and is
non-recourse to us.
British Pound Sterling Term Loan due 2025
On January 6, 2020, we entered into a £700 million unsecured sterling-denominated term loan with Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent, and several lenders from time-to-time are parties thereto. The applicable margin under the term loan was
adjustable based on a pricing grid from 0.85% to 1.65% dependent on our current credit rating. On March 4, 2020, we entered into an
interest rate swap transaction (effective March 6, 2020) to fix the interest rate to approximately 0.70% for the duration of the loan. The
applicable margin for the pricing grid (which can vary based on our credit rating) increased from 1.25% to 1.65% on March 10, 2023
with the change in credit rating, for an all-in fixed rate at December 31, 2023 of 2.349%. With the August 6, 2024 amendment
discussed above, our all-in fixed rate increased to 3.70%.
As noted earlier, we paid down the British pound sterling secured term loan due 2025 by £207 million in 2024 with proceeds
from the British pound sterling secured term due 2034 and asset sales. The balance of this loan of £493 million at December 31, 2024
was paid in full on January 15, 2025.
Interest Rate Swaps
At December 31, 2024, we had a derivative asset of approximately $3 million related to the sterling-denominated term loan
interest rate swap (which was terminated on January 15, 2025 with the payoff of the British pound sterling term loan due 2025). At
December 31, 2023, we had a derivative asset of approximately $43 million related to the combination of the sterling-denominated
term loan interest rate swap and the Australian dollar term loan interest rate swap (which was terminated in the second quarter of 2024
as a result of the payoff of the Australian term loan). Derivative assets are included in “Other assets” on our consolidated balance
sheets.
Senior Unsecured Notes
The following are the basic terms of our senior unsecured notes at December 31, 2024 (par value amounts in thousands):
Offering
Completion Date
Maturity Date
Par Value
% of Par
Value
Interest Payment
Frequency
3.325% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025
March 24, 2017
March 24, 2025
€
500,000
100.000%
Annually
0.993% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026
October 6, 2021
October 15, 2026
€
500,000
100.000%
Annually
2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026
March 24, 2021
March 24, 2026
£
500,000
99.937%
Annually
5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026
July 22, 2016
August 1, 2026
$
500,000
100.000%
Semi-annually
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027
September 21,
2017
October 15, 2027
$ 1,400,000
100.000%
Semi-annually
3.692% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028
December 5, 2019
June 5, 2028
£
600,000
99.998%
Annually
4.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2029
July 26, 2019
August 1, 2029
$
900,000
99.500%
Semi-annually
3.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2030
March 24, 2021
April 24, 2030
£
350,000
99.448%
Annually
3.500% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2031
December 4, 2020
March 15, 2031
$ 1,300,000
100.000%
Semi-annually
We may repurchase, redeem, or refinance senior unsecured notes from time-to-time. We may purchase senior notes for cash
through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or a tender offer. In some cases, we may redeem some or all of the
notes at any time, but may require a redemption premium that will decrease over time. In the event of a change of control, each holder
of the notes may require us to repurchase some or all of our notes at a repurchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal
amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. Redemptions and repurchases of debt, if any, will depend
on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors.
Debt Refinancing and Unutilized Financing Costs
2024 Activity
In 2024, we incurred $4.3 million of debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs. These costs were incurred primarily as a
result of the reduction in revolving commitments under our Credit Facility and partial paydowns of our British pound sterling term
loan due 2025.

104
2023 Activity
As a result of the early redemption of a portion of the Australian term loan, we incurred approximately $0.8 million to accelerate
the amortization of related debt issue costs in 2023. This charge was more than offset by the $1.1 million gain realized on the purchase
of approximately £50 million of our 2.550% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023 at a discount in 2023.
2022 Activity
In 2022, we incurred approximately $9.5 million of debt refinancing costs. These costs were incurred as a result of the payoff of
our July 2021 Interim Credit Facility with proceeds from the Macquarie Transaction on March 14, 2022, along with the amendment of
our Credit Facility on June 29, 2022.
Covenants and Restrictions
Our debt facilities impose certain restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to: incur debts; create or incur liens;
provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other entity; make redemptions and repurchases of our capital stock; prepay,
redeem, or repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; enter into affiliated transactions; dispose of real estate or other
assets; and change our business. In addition, the credit agreements governing our Credit Facility limit the amount of dividends we can
pay as a percentage of normalized adjusted funds from operations (“NAFFO”), as defined in the agreements, on a rolling four quarter
basis to 95% of NAFFO. The indentures governing our senior unsecured notes also limit the amount of dividends we can pay based on
the sum of 95% of NAFFO, proceeds of equity issuances, and certain other net cash proceeds. Finally, our senior unsecured notes
require us to maintain total unencumbered assets (as defined in the related indenture) of not less than 150% of our unsecured
indebtedness.
In addition to these restrictions, the Credit Facility contains customary financial and operating covenants, including covenants
relating to our total leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, secured leverage ratio, consolidated adjusted net worth, unsecured
leverage ratio, and unsecured interest coverage ratio. On April 12, 2024, the Credit Facility was amended to waive the 10% cap on
unencumbered asset value attributable to tenants subject to a bankruptcy event for purposes of determining compliance with the
unsecured leverage ratio for the trailing four fiscal quarter period ended June 30, 2024, and for purposes of determining pro forma
compliance with the unsecured leverage ratio for certain asset sales and debt transactions.
On August 6, 2024, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to increase the maximum total leverage ratio covenant
from 60% to 65% and the maximum unsecured leverage ratio covenant from 65% to 70% and to decrease the minimum unsecured
interest coverage ratio from 1.75:1.00 to 1.45:1.00. The amendment was effective as of June 30, 2024 and was to continue in effect
through and including September 30, 2025 (the “Modified Covenant Period”) at which point the credit agreement provided that
covenants would automatically reset to their prior levels. In addition, the amendment permanently reduced the minimum consolidated
adjusted net worth covenant from approximately $6.7 billion to $5 billion, in each case plus the sum of certain equity proceeds. The
amendment also limited the payment of dividends in cash during the Modified Covenant Period to $0.08 per share in any fiscal
quarter, but the amendment did not provide any additional restrictions on the payment of dividends outside of the Modified Covenant
Period.
On February 13, 2025 and concurrent with the closing of our private notes offering as discussed in Note 14, we further amended
the Credit Facility and (i) removed the Modified Covenant Period and any restrictions related thereto from the existing Credit Facility,
which restrictions included additional mandatory prepayments and a restriction on cash dividends to $0.08 per share per fiscal quarter,
(ii) permanently removed financial covenants regarding minimum consolidated tangible net worth, maximum unsecured indebtedness
to unencumbered asset value and minimum unsecured net operating income to unsecured interest expense, (iii) amended certain
definitions used in the financial covenant regarding maximum total indebtedness to total asset value to conform to corresponding
definitions in our existing unsecured indentures and the secured notes issued concurrently and set the covenant level at 60%, (iv)
provided notice that we plan to exercise both of our maturity extension options (without changing the other conditions thereof) such
that the maturity of the revolving portion of our Credit Facility would move to June 30, 2027 (subject to the satisfaction of the other
conditions), (v) reset the interest rate to SOFR plus 225 basis points, (vi) provided for the loans thereunder to be secured and
guaranteed ratably with the secured notes issued concurrently, (vii) set the maximum secured leverage ratio at 40%, and (viii) added
mandatory prepayments of senior debt or addition of additional collateral in connection with any failure to (x) maintain a 65%
maximum ratio of secured first lien debt to the undepreciated real estate value of the secured pool properties or (y) maintain a
minimum senior secured debt service coverage ratio of 1.15:1.00 (increasing to 1.30:1.00 in 12 months).
In addition to the covenants and restrictions discussed above, our Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, material inaccuracy of representations, and failure to comply with our covenants. If
an event of default occurs and is continuing under the Credit Facility, the entire outstanding balance may become immediately due and
payable. At December 31, 2024, we were in compliance with all financial and operating covenants, as amended.

105
5. Income Taxes
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
We have maintained and intend to maintain our election as a REIT under the Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a
number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income
to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if we distribute 100% of our REIT taxable
income to our stockholders and satisfy certain other requirements; instead, income tax is paid directly by our stockholders on the
dividends distributed to them. If our REIT taxable income exceeds our dividends in a tax year, REIT tax rules allow us to designate
dividends from the subsequent tax year in order to avoid current taxation on undistributed income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in
any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates. Taxable income from non-REIT activities
managed through our TRS entities is subject to applicable U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes. Our international subsidiaries are
also subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which they operate.
From our TRS entities and our foreign operations, income tax (expense) benefit were as follows (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Current income tax (expense) benefit:
Domestic............................................................................................
$
477
$
(7,756)
$
1,111
Foreign...............................................................................................
(31,589)
(24,257)
(27,751)
(31,112)
(32,013)
(26,640)
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit:
Domestic............................................................................................
(465)
8,926
(15,628)
Foreign...............................................................................................
(12,524)
153,766
(13,632)
(12,989)
162,692
(29,260)
Income tax (expense) benefit ..............................................................
$
(44,101)
$
130,679
$
(55,900)
A reconciliation of income tax (expense) benefit from the statutory income tax rate to the effective tax rate based on (loss)
income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 is as follows (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Loss) income before income tax..........................................................
$
(2,364,186)
$
(686,771)
$
959,719
Income tax benefit (expense) at the U.S. statutory federal rate............
496,479
144,222
(201,541)
Decrease (increase) in income tax resulting from:
Foreign rate differential ....................................................................
4,888
(4,122)
1,826
State income taxes, net of federal benefit.........................................
—
1,275
(1,886)
U.S. earnings not subject to federal income tax................................
(227,080)
(115,189)
165,705
Change in valuation allowance.........................................................
(301,468)
(45,692)
(11,281)
Statutory tax rate change...................................................................
—
—
(941)
Interest disallowance.........................................................................
(2,965)
(3,421)
(1,737)
Tax Impact of UK REIT conversion.................................................
—
160,641
—
Other items, net.................................................................................
(13,955)
(7,035)
(6,045)
Total income tax (expense) benefit.......................................................
$
(44,101)
$
130,679
$
(55,900)
The foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign profit before income taxes of $127.9 million, $6.3 million, and
$159.6 million in 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
The domestic provision for income taxes is based on (loss) income before income taxes of $(1.4) billion in 2024, $(144.5)
million in 2023, and $10.8 million in 2022 from our TRS entities.

106
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
2024
2023
Deferred tax assets:
Operating loss and interest deduction carry forwards .................................................
$
263,523
$
143,683
Depreciation.................................................................................................................
56,089
45,146
Partnership investments...............................................................................................
112,892
15,768
Impairment and other loss reserves .............................................................................
101,834
11,790
Other............................................................................................................................
8,500
7,109
Total deferred tax assets ..............................................................................................
542,838
223,496
Valuation allowance ....................................................................................................
(418,659)
(117,191)
Total net deferred tax assets ........................................................................................
$
124,179
$
106,305
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment...............................................................................................
$
(145,835)
$
(158,330)
Net unbilled revenue....................................................................................................
(82,170)
(65,727)
Partnership investments...............................................................................................
(21,445)
—
Other............................................................................................................................
(3,450)
(10,687)
Total deferred tax liabilities.........................................................................................
(252,900)
(234,744)
Net deferred tax asset (liability) ......................................................................................
$
(128,721)
$
(128,439)
At December 31, 2024, we had net operating losses ("NOL") and other tax attribute carryforwards as follows (in thousands):
U.S.
Foreign
Gross NOL carryforwards..................................................................$
704,434
$
453,615
Tax-effected NOL carryforwards.......................................................$
151,942
$
112,111
Valuation allowance...........................................................................
(151,942)
(6,273)
Net deferred tax asset - NOL carryforwards......................................$
—
$
105,838
Expiration periods
2025-indefinite
indefinite
Valuation Allowance
A valuation allowance has been recorded on certain foreign and domestic net operating loss carryforwards and other net
deferred tax assets that may not be realized. As of each reporting date, we consider all new evidence that could impact the future
realization of our deferred tax assets. In the evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance on our deferred income tax assets, we
consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred income tax liabilities, carryback of
future period losses to prior periods, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance.
During 2024, a valuation allowance of $301.5 million has been recorded against a portion of our deferred tax assets to recognize
only the components of the deferred tax assets that is more likely than not to be realized. The valuation allowance was primarily
recorded against deferred tax assets for NOLs, non-depreciable basis of real property, and other tax attributes that we believe will not
be realized. Valuation allowance activity recorded generally follows the activity of the associated deferred tax asset that is not
expected to be recognized. From time-to-time, we may acquire deferred tax assets as part of real estate transactions and will assess the
need for a valuation allowance as part of the opening balance sheet. Additionally, valuation allowances will be remeasured for foreign
currency translation fluctuations through other comprehensive income.
We have no material uncertain tax position liabilities and related interest or penalties.
REIT Status
We have met the annual REIT distribution requirements by payment of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income in 2024, 2023,
and 2022. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of such distributions, will differ from net income reported for financial
reporting purposes due primarily to differences in cost basis, differences in the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation,
and differences between the allocation of our net income and loss for financial reporting purposes and for tax reporting purposes.

107
A schedule of per share distributions we paid and reported to our stockholders is set forth in the following:
For the Years Ended December 31,
Per share:
2024
2023
2022
Ordinary dividend (1) ........................................................... $
—
$
1.0639
$
0.4703
Long-term capital gain (2) ....................................................
—
0.1061
0.6797
Return of capital....................................................................
0.3800
—
—
Total.................................................................................. $
0.3800 (3) $
1.1700
$
1.1500
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, includes Section 199A dividends of 1.0639 and 0.4703, respectively.
(2) For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, includes Unrecaptured Section 1250 gains of 0.1061 and 0.2574,
respectively.
(3) The dividend declared on November 21, 2024 and paid January 9, 2025 will be applicable to the 2025 tax year and thus
is not reflected in the table above.
Similar to our U.S. REIT, we have met all requirements of our U.K. REIT as of December 31, 2024.
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
As a partnership, the allocated share of income of the Operating Partnership is included in the income tax returns of the general
and limited partners. Accordingly, no accounting for income taxes is generally required for such income of the Operating Partnership.
However, the Operating Partnership has formed TRS entities on behalf of Medical Properties Trust, Inc., which are subject to U.S.
federal, state, and local income taxes at regular corporate rates, and its international subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in the
jurisdictions in which they operate. See discussion above under Medical Properties Trust, Inc. for more details of income taxes
associated with our TRS entities and international operations.
6. Earnings Per Share/Unit
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Our earnings per share were calculated based on the following (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Numerator:
Net (loss) income ...................................................................................... $
(2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Non-controlling interests’ share in earnings.............................................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Participating securities’ share in earnings.................................................
(946)
(1,644)
(1,602)
Net (loss) income, less participating securities’ share in
earnings.............................................................................................. $
(2,411,217)
$
(558,120)
$
900,995
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average common shares ..................................................
600,248
598,518
598,634
Dilutive potential common shares(1)........................................................
—
—
203
Diluted weighted-average common shares ...........................................
600,248
598,518
598,837

108
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Our earnings per unit were calculated based on the following (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Numerator:
Net (loss) income...................................................................................... $
(2,408,287)
$
(556,092)
$
903,819
Non-controlling interests’ share in earnings.............................................
(1,984)
(384)
(1,222)
Participating securities’ share in earnings ................................................
(946)
(1,644)
(1,602)
Net (loss) income, less participating securities’ share in
earnings.............................................................................................. $
(2,411,217)
$
(558,120)
$
900,995
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average units ...................................................................
600,248
598,518
598,634
Dilutive potential units(1).........................................................................
—
—
203
Diluted weighted-average units............................................................
600,248
598,518
598,837
(1)
The above computation of diluted earnings per share does not include 17,162 and 32,382 potential common shares/units
for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
7. Stock Awards
Stock Awards
During the second quarter of 2022, we amended the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan"), which authorizes
the issuance of common stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, deferred stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units, and
awards of interests in our Operating Partnership. Our Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors ("Board"), and we have reserved 28.9 million shares of common stock for awards, of which 8.9 million shares
remain available for future stock awards as of December 31, 2024. The Equity Incentive Plan contains a limit of 5 million shares as
the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be awarded to an individual in any fiscal year. Awards under the Equity
Incentive Plan are subject to forfeiture due to termination of employment prior to vesting and/or from not achieving the respective
performance/market conditions. In the event of a change in control, outstanding and unvested options will immediately vest, unless
otherwise provided in the participant’s award or employment agreement, and restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock
units, and other stock-based awards will vest if so provided in the participant’s award agreement. The term of the awards is set by the
Compensation Committee, though Incentive Stock Options may not have terms of more than ten years. Forfeited awards (along with
shares withheld for payroll tax withholding purposes) are returned to the Equity Incentive Plan and are then available to be re-issued
as future awards. For each share of common stock issued by Medical Properties Trust, Inc. pursuant to its Equity Incentive Plan, the
Operating Partnership issues a corresponding number of Operating Partnership units.
For the past three years, we have only granted restricted stock and RSUs pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan. These awards
have been granted in the form of service-based awards, performance awards based on company-specific performance hurdles, and
market-based awards. See below for further details on each of these awards:
Service-Based Awards
In 2024, 2023, and 2022, the Compensation Committee granted service-based awards to employees and non-employee directors.
Service-based awards vest as the employee/director provides the required service (typically over three years). Dividends are generally
paid on these awards prior to vesting.
Performance-Based Awards
In 2023 and 2022, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based awards to employees. Generally, dividends are not
paid on performance awards until the award is earned. See below for details of such performance-based award grants.
In 2023 and 2022, a target number of stock awards were granted to employees that could be earned based on the achievement of
specific performance thresholds as set by our Compensation Committee. The performance thresholds were based on a three-year
period with the opportunity to earn a portion of the award earlier. More or less shares than the target number of shares are available to
be earned based on our performance compared to the set thresholds. At the end of each of the performance periods, any earned shares
during such period will vest on January 1 of the following calendar year. The performance thresholds for 2023 were based on strategic

109
transactions (including new investments and proceeds from individual property disposals and larger asset disposals through joint
venture transactions) and EBITDA, while 2022 awards were based on funds from operations growth, EBITDA, and acquisitions.
Certain performance awards granted were subject to a modifier which increases or decreases the actual shares earned in each
performance period. The modifier for the 2023 and 2022 awards was based on two components: 1) how our total shareholder return
(“TSR”) compared to the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Health Care Index for 2023 and 2022 and 2) how our TSR compared to a
threshold set by the Compensation Committee.
Market-Based Awards
In 2024 and 2023, the Compensation Committee granted market-based awards to employees. Generally, dividends are not paid
on market-based awards until the award is earned. See details below of such market-based award grants.
On March 8, 2024, the Compensation Committee granted 2,700,000 market-based RSUs to the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer at the target level of achievement, which would represent a 67% increase in the market price of
our common stock at time of grant. The RSUs may be settled only in cash and the cash payment will be calculated based on the
average closing price of the Company's common stock on the five trading days ending on the vesting date. The RSUs are earned at the
same share price target level, with the opportunity to earn up to three times target if the Company's share price reaches higher stock
price hurdles and the same trailing 20-trading day average closing price as the 2023 awards discussed below during the four-year
period ending December 31, 2027. Earned RSUs will become vested on the earlier of equal quarterly installments over the first year
from the date the RSUs are earned or the date that the Committee makes a determination of achievement of the performance metrics
following the end of the four-year performance period, subject to the grantee’s continued employment through such date.
On December 8, 2023, the Compensation Committee approved market-based restricted stock awards to employees other than
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 2,500,000 shares of common stock at the target level of
achievement. These shares will be earned at the target level only if the Company's share price increases to $7.00 per share, with the
opportunity to earn more shares (up to three times target), based on higher stock price hurdles. The actual number of shares to be
earned pursuant to these awards will be determined based on a trailing 20-trading day average closing price of the Company's common
stock during the four-year period following the December 8, 2023 grant date or December 31, 2027, for certain awards granted after
December 8, 2023. Earned shares will vest in equal quarterly installments over two years following the date that the Compensation
Committee makes a determination of achievement of the performance metrics, subject to the grantee’s continued employment through
such date, provided that all unvested earned shares will vest in full following the end of the performance period.
The following summarizes award activity in 2024 and 2023 (which includes awards granted in 2024, 2023, and any applicable
prior years), respectively:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024:
Vesting Based
on Service
Vesting Based on
Market/Performance
Conditions
Shares
Weighted-Average
Value at Award Date
Shares
Weighted-Average
Value at Award Date
Nonvested awards at beginning of the year .............
1,144,796
$
13.01
12,576,792
$
10.20
Awarded...................................................................
1,519,207
$
4.36
345,000
$
7.78
Vested ......................................................................
(993,312) $
10.62
(1,179,631) $
16.81
Forfeited...................................................................
(29,191) $
9.58
(1,428,940) $
10.40
Nonvested awards at end of year .............................
1,641,500
$
6.50
10,313,221
$
9.33
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023:
Vesting Based
on Service
Vesting Based on
Market/Performance
Conditions
Shares
Weighted-Average
Value at Award Date
Shares
Weighted-Average
Value at Award Date
Nonvested awards at beginning of the year...........
810,483
$
21.02
4,349,081
$
18.26
Awarded.................................................................
1,210,448
$
10.36
10,270,260
$
8.47
Vested ....................................................................
(864,482) $
16.60
(1,591,846) $
19.65
Forfeited.................................................................
(11,653) $
12.27
(450,703) $
12.44
Nonvested awards at end of year ...........................
1,144,796
$
13.01
12,576,792
$
10.20
Additionally, the market-based RSUs granted in 2024 (not included in the tables above) with cash-settlement features are
nonvested as of December 31, 2024. These liability-type awards are adjusted to fair value on a quarterly basis using a Monte Carlo

110
valuation model, which used the following assumptions for grant date and quarterly valuations for the year ended December 31, 2024:
(i) common stock price at measurement date, (ii) annual equity volatility ranging from 45.0% to 57.0%, (iii) risk-free rate ranging
from 3.58% to 4.41%, and (iv) dividend yield ranging from 8.10% to 14.35%. The grant date fair value of these RSUs was $13.3
million, and none of these RSUs were vested or forfeited as of December 31, 2024.
The value of stock-based awards is charged to compensation expense over the service periods. For the years ended
December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, we recorded $28.4 million, $33.3 million, and $49.4 million, respectively, of non-cash
compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we also recorded $4.6 million of compensation expense for the RSUs
with cash-settlement features, and we have a corresponding $4.6 million liability as of December 31, 2024.
The remaining unrecognized cost from equity-settled awards at December 31, 2024, is $29.6 million, which will be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.27 years. The remaining unrecognized cost from cash-settled awards at December 31, 2024, is
$11.3 million, which will be recognized over a derived service period of 2.03 years as of December 31, 2024. Stock-based awards that
vested in 2024, 2023, and 2022, had a value of $10.9 million, $22.5 million, and $82.6 million, respectively.
8. Contingencies
As part of the global settlement with Steward discussed in Note 3, upon completion of the transfers to the new operators and
satisfaction of certain other conditions, in addition to approval by relevant state and local regulators, each of the Company and
Steward have agreed, subject to specified exceptions, to the mutual release of claims against each other, including payment by
Steward of any accrued or future rent under its master leases with the Company and accrued or future payments of principal and
interest on outstanding loans from the Company. Steward’s asset backed lenders also forfeited their right to cause the Company to
purchase up to $60 million of bridge loans made to Steward during the first quarter of 2024. In connection with the global settlement
with Steward and reciprocal release of claims, the Company had an approximate $31 million liability at December 31, 2024, for
property taxes, other property related expenses, and other obligations due to third parties.
We are party to various lawsuits as described below:
Securities and Derivative Litigation
On April 13, 2023, we and certain of our executives were named as defendants in a putative federal securities class action
lawsuit alleging false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions resulted in artificially inflated prices for our common stock, filed
by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Case No. 2:23-cv-00486). The
complaint seeks class certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between July 15, 2019 and February 22, 2023 and
unspecified damages including interest and an award of reasonable costs and expenses. This class action complaint was amended on
September 22, 2023 and alleges that we made material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our
tenants. On September 26, 2024, the Court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice, and the plaintiff thereafter moved the
Court to alter its judgment. That motion has been fully briefed and is currently pending before the Court.
Members of our Board of Directors were also named as defendants in two related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by
purported stockholders in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on October 19, 2023 (Case No. 2:23-
cv-01415) and December 7, 2023 (Case No. 2:23-cv-01667). The Company was named as a nominal defendant in both complaints.
These shareholder derivative complaints both make allegations similar to those made in the Alabama securities lawsuit described
above relating to purported material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our tenants. These
derivative actions have been consolidated and stayed pending further developments in the Alabama securities lawsuit. Members of our
Board of Directors were also named as defendants in three related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by purported stockholders in
the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on February 16, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-00471), June 28, 2024 (Case No.
1:24-cv-01899), and July 26, 2024 (Case No. 1 24-cv-02173). The Company was named as a nominal defendant. These shareholder
derivative complaints make allegations similar to those made in the Alabama securities and derivative lawsuits described above
relating to purported material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our tenants. Defendants have not
been required to respond to these complaints pending further developments in the Alabama securities lawsuit.
On September 29, 2023, we and certain of our executives were named as defendants in a putative federal securities class action
lawsuit filed by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-cv-
08597). The complaint seeks class certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between May 23, 2023 and August 17,
2023 and alleges false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. This
class action complaint was amended on October 30, 2024 and alleges that we made material misstatements or omissions in connection
with certain transactions involving Prospect. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on January 14, 2025.
Members of our Board of Directors were also named as defendants in two related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by
purported stockholders in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 18, 2023 (Case No.
1:23-cv- 10934) and March 1, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-01589). The Company was named as a nominal defendant in both complaints.
These shareholder derivative complaints both make allegations similar to those made in the New York securities lawsuit described

111
above relating to purported false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving
Prospect. The two cases have been consolidated and stayed pending further developments in the New York securities lawsuit
described above. On February 21, 2024, members of our Board of Directors were named as defendants in a shareholder derivative
lawsuit filed by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Case No. 1:24-cv-00527). The
Company was named as a nominal defendant. This shareholder derivative complaint makes allegations similar to those made in the
New York securities and derivative lawsuits described above relating to purported false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions
in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. This action has been stayed pending further developments in the New York
securities action described above.
We believe these claims are without merit and intend to defend the remaining open cases vigorously. We have not recorded a
liability related to the lawsuits above because, at this time, we are unable to determine whether an unfavorable outcome is probable or
to estimate reasonably possible losses.
Defamation Litigation
On March 30, 2023, we commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Case No.
2:23-cv-00408), against short-seller Viceroy Research LLC ("Viceroy") and its members. We were seeking injunctive relief and
damages for defamation, civil conspiracy, tortious interference, private nuisance, and unjust enrichment based on defamatory
statements expressed against us. On June 29, 2023, we won a preliminary ruling in this lawsuit after Viceroy's motion to dismiss the
case was denied by a judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. On December 18, 2024, we
reached an agreement with Viceroy and its members to mutually settle and dismiss this defamation lawsuit.
From time-to-time, we are a party to other legal proceedings, claims, or regulatory inquiries and investigations arising out of, or
incidental to, our business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the outcome of any particular matter, in the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to those proceedings is not presently
expected to materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
9. Common Stock/Partner’s Capital
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
On October 9, 2022, the Board of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program (the "Stock Repurchase Program") for
up to $500 million of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. In 2022, we repurchased 1.6 million shares for a total of $17.9
million. The Stock Repurchase Program expired on October 10, 2023.
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
At December 31, 2024, the Operating Partnership is made up of a general partner, Medical Properties Trust, LLC (“General
Partner”) and limited partners, including the Company (which owns 100% of the General Partner) and MPT TRS, Inc. (which is 100%
owned by the General Partner). By virtue of its ownership of the General Partner, the Company has a 100% ownership interest in the
Operating Partnership.
In regards to distributions, the Operating Partnership shall distribute cash at such times and in such amounts as are determined
by the General Partner in its sole and absolute discretion, to common unit holders who are common unit holders on the record date.
However, per the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Operating
Partnership Agreement”), the General Partner shall use its reasonable efforts to cause the Operating Partnership to distribute amounts
sufficient to enable the Company to pay stockholder dividends that will allow the Company to (i) meet its distribution requirement for
qualification as a REIT and (ii) avoid any U.S. federal income or excise tax liability imposed by the Code, other than to the extent the
Company elects to retain and pay income tax on its net capital gain. In accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement, LTIP
units are treated as common units for distribution purposes.
The Operating Partnership’s net income will generally be allocated first to the General Partner to the extent of any cumulative
losses and then to the partners in accordance with their respective percentage interests in the common units issued by the Operating
Partnership. Any losses of the Operating Partnership will be allocated pro-rata to the partners in accordance with their respective
percentage interests in the common units issued by the Operating Partnership until their adjusted capital balances are reduced to zero,
then to the General Partner. In accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement, LTIP units are treated as common units for
purposes of income and loss allocations. Limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of
their common units. It is at the Operating Partnership’s discretion to redeem such common units for cash based on the fair market
value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of redemption or, alternatively, redeem the
common units for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits,
stock dividends, or similar events. LTIP units must wait two years from the issuance of the LTIP units to be redeemed, and then
converted to common units. No LTIP units exist at December 31, 2024.

112
For each share of common stock issued/repurchased by Medical Properties Trust, Inc., the Operating Partnership
issues/repurchases a corresponding number of operating partnership units.
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We have various assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments. We estimate that the carrying value of cash and
cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values. We estimate the fair value of our interest
and rent receivables using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar
receivables would be made to others with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our mortgage
loans and other loans are estimated by using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates
which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. We determine the
fair value of our senior unsecured notes using Level 2 inputs such as quotes from securities dealers and market makers. We estimate
the fair value of our revolving credit facility and term loans using Level 2 inputs based on the present value of future payments,
discounted at a rate which we consider appropriate for such debt.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment. Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be a prudent management decision.
The following table summarizes fair value estimates for our financial instruments (in thousands):
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Asset (Liability)
Book
Value
Fair
Value
Book
Value
Fair
Value
Interest and rent receivables........................ $
36,327
$
36,432
$
45,059
$
45,476
Loans(1) ......................................................
467,120 (2)
470,380
1,302,727 (2)
1,202,383
Debt, net......................................................
(8,848,112)
(7,301,395)
(10,064,236)
(8,256,465)
(1) Excludes the convertible loan made in May 2023 to PHP Holdings and the acquisition loan made in May 2020 related to
our investment in the international joint venture, along with the related subsequent investment in the real estate of three
hospitals in Colombia, as these assets are accounted for under the fair value option method, as noted below.
(2) Includes $7.9 million and $162.4 million of mortgage loans, a $315.5 million and $323.8 million shareholder loan included
in investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, $39.7 million and $526.9 million of loans that are part of our
investments in unconsolidated operating entities, and $104.0 million and $289.6 million of other loans at December 31,
2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Our equity investment and related loan to the international joint venture, our loan investment in the real estate of three hospitals
operated by subsidiaries of the international joint venture in Colombia, our equity investment in Lifepoint Behavioral (which was sold
in March 2024), and our investment in PHP Holdings are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as we elected to account for these
investments using the fair value option at the point of initial investment. We elected to account for these investments at fair value due
to the size of the investments and because we believed this method was more reflective of current values.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the amounts recorded under the fair value option method were as follows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2023
Asset (Liability)
Fair Value
Original
Cost
Fair Value
Original
Cost
Asset Type Classification
Mortgage loans................................. $
111,985
$
129,968
$
146,892
$
146,892
Mortgage loans
Equity investment and other loans ...
154,229
910,594
939,903
912,999
Investments in unconsolidated
operating entities/Other loans
Our loans to the international joint venture and its subsidiaries are recorded at fair value based on Level 2 and Level 3 inputs by
discounting the estimated future contractual cash flows using a credit-adjusted rate of return, which is derived from market rates of
return on similar loans with similar credit quality and remaining maturity. Our equity investment in Lifepoint Behavioral (which was
sold in March 2024) was recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2023, based on Level 2 inputs by discounting the estimated cash
flows expected to be realized as part of the Lifepoint Transaction described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. Our
equity investment in the international joint venture and our investment in PHP Holdings are recorded at fair value based on Level 3
inputs, by using a market approach (for our equity investment in the international joint venture) and a market approach based on the

113
agreed upon price in the pending transaction (for our investment in PHP Holdings), which requires significant estimates of our
investee, such as projected revenue, expenses, and working capital, and appropriate consideration of the underlying risk profile of the
forecasted assumptions associated with the investee. We classify our valuations of these investments as Level 3, as we use certain
unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value measurement, and the valuations require
management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices. For the market approach model used for our investment in PHP
Holdings, our unobservable inputs include purchase price adjustments related to expected balance sheet values at the time of the
transaction close, and an adjustment for a marketability discount ("DLOM"). In regard to the underlying projections used in the
discounted cash flow model, such projections are provided by the investees. However, we may modify such projections as needed
based on our review and analysis of historical results, meetings with key members of management, and our understanding of trends
and developments within the healthcare industry.
In 2024, we recorded a net unfavorable adjustment to the investments accounted for under the fair value option method of
approximately $790 million, primarily related to the loan to the international joint venture (including approximately $18 million
related to our investment in three hospitals in Colombia) and our investment in PHP Holdings as further discussed in Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements, compared to a favorable adjustment of approximately $29 million in 2023.
For our investment in PHP Holdings, the discount rate, selected revenue multiple range, and selected EBITDA multiple range
were 11%, 1.1x to 1.3x, and 10x to 14x, respectively, at December 31, 2023. These measures were not used in our valuation as of
December 31, 2024, as they were not required for the market approach based on the price of the pending transaction. The DLOM on
our investment in PHP Holdings was approximately 14.2% at December 31, 2024 compared to 8% at December 31, 2023. The
increase in the DLOM used in our fair value analysis of our investment in PHP Holdings compared to December 31, 2023 aligned
with the expected value from the Astrana Health deal more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
In arriving at the DLOM, we considered many qualitative factors, including the percent of control, the nature of the underlying
investee's business along with our rights as an investor pursuant to the operating agreement, the size of investment, expected holding
period, number of shareholders, access to capital marketplace, etc. To illustrate the effect of movements in the DLOM, we performed
a sensitivity analysis below by using full basis point variations (in thousands):
Basis Point Change in Marketability Discount
Estimated Increase
(Decrease) in Fair Value
+ 100 basis points...............................................................................................................................
$
(1,737)
- 100 basis points................................................................................................................................
1,737
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we have assets and liabilities that are measured, from
time-to-time, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as for impairment purposes of our real estate, financial instruments, and for
certain equity investments without a readily determinable fair value.
Impairment and Fair Value Adjustments of Non-Real Estate Investments
2024
Prior to the global settlement in September 2024 (as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements) in which our
claims were released, our non-real estate investments in Steward and related affiliates included our 9.9% equity investment, working
capital and other secured loans, and a loan made to a Steward affiliate in 2021, proceeds of which were used to redeem a similarly
sized convertible loan held by Steward’s former private equity sponsor. In addition, the loan to the international joint venture is
collateralized by the equity of Steward held by an investor in both Steward and the international joint venture. To assess recovery of
these investments, we performed a valuation of Steward’s business at March 31, 2024, with assistance from a third-party, independent
valuation firm. The valuation approaches utilized included the cost, market, and income approaches. The fair value analysis was
performed under a non-going concern, orderly liquidation premise of value and assuming normal exposure to market participants. We
utilized this premise of value due to Steward’s ongoing financial distress and subsequent filing of bankruptcy. Accordingly, the
valuation approaches used, including the Level 3 inputs, were based on the financial performance of the Steward assets. For profitable
hospitals, Level 3 inputs included a weighted average EBITDA multiple of 6.48x from a selected range of 5x to 7x in reference to
comparable transactions. We also used a weighted average discount rate of 15.03% from a selected range of 15% to 16%. For
unprofitable hospitals, Level 3 inputs included a weighted average net revenue multiple of 0.275x from a selected range of 0.25x to
0.30x in reference to comparable transactions. We also considered the reported book values inclusive of various adjustments for
unprofitable hospitals. After reducing the derived fair value of Steward's business for Steward's secured debt (including our working
capital and other secured loans) and their working capital deficit, we arrived at only a nominal remaining value that could not support
the carrying value of the loan to a Steward affiliate from 2021 or our remaining 9.9% equity investment. In addition, the value of the
investor's share of the remaining 90.1% of Steward's equity that collateralized the loan to the international joint venture was deemed

114
insufficient to support recovery of this investment. As a result, we recorded impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments in
the 2024 first quarter of approximately $625 million, as discussed further in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
We updated our fair value analysis of Steward's business at June 30, 2024, using a similar approach as done in the 2024 first
quarter resulting in no further impairments or fair value adjustments to non-real estate investments in the 2024 second quarter. In the
third quarter of 2024, as a result of the Company’s global settlement with Steward (as discussed further in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements), the Company recorded impairment charges of approximately $425 million for the working capital loans and
other secured loans previously advanced to Steward.
2023
To assess recovery of our non-real estate investments in Steward in 2023, along with the $219 million loan to the international
joint venture that was collateralized by the equity of Steward held by an investor in both Steward and the international joint venture,
we performed a valuation of Steward's business at December 31, 2023, with assistance from a third-party, independent valuation firm,
using a market valuation approach, with Level 3 inputs including the selected revenue multiple range of 0.50x to 0.60x in reference to
comparable transactions. After reducing the derived fair value for the loans to Steward discussed above, we arrived at a fair value for
Steward's equity. We then compared our equity investment's carrying value to our 9.9% share of the fair value of Steward's equity,
which resulted in the need for an impairment charge of approximately $90 million. The value of the investor's share of the remaining
90.1% of Steward's equity that collateralizes the loan to the international joint venture was deemed sufficient to support recovery of
this investment at that time.
2022
In 2022, we performed an impairment analysis on our investments in financing leases with Prospect using an income approach
with Level 3 inputs including the selected market capitalization rate range of 7.5% to 9.0%. For these assets, we divided the expected
operating income (i.e. rent revenue less expenses, if any) from the underlying properties by a market capitalization rate. We then
compared the carrying value of our investment to the derived fair value, which resulted in a $170 million impairment to the
Pennslyvania assets.
Impairment of Real Estate Investments
See the Steward and Prospect subheadings under "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements for a discussion around the use of fair value and related assumptions in the impairment of our real estate investments.
Equity Investments Without a Readily Determinable Fair Value
For our equity investment in Swiss Medical (which does not have a readily determinable fair value), we marked our investment
to fair value in the 2023 third quarter based on the price paid by a new investor in the same security, resulting in a CHF 20 million
favorable adjustment.
11. Leases (Lessee)
We lease the land underlying certain of our facilities (for which we typically sublease to our tenants), along with corporate
offices and equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms that vary in years, and some of the leases have initial fixed terms (or
renewal options available) that extend the leases up to, or just beyond, the depreciable life of the properties that occupy the leased
land. Renewal options that we are reasonably certain to exercise are recognized in our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. As most
of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at lease
commencement date in determining the present value of future payments.
The following is a summary of our lease expense (in thousands):
Income Statement
For the Years Ended December 31,
Classification
2024
2023
2022
Operating lease cost (1) ..................
(2)
$
10,725
$
11,653
$
12,175
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use
assets.............................................
Real estate depreciation and amortization
51
51
51
Interest on lease liabilities.............
Interest
128
128
128
Sublease income .............................
Other
(3,259)
(4,178)
(4,485)
Total lease cost................................
$
7,645
$
7,654
$
7,869
(1)
Includes short-term leases.

115
(2)
$5.1 million, $6.0 million, and $5.7 million included in “Property-related”, with the remainder reflected in the “General
and administrative” line of our consolidated statements of net income for 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Fixed minimum payments due over the remaining lease term under non-cancelable leases of more than one year and amounts to
be received in the future from non-cancelable subleases over their remaining lease term at December 31, 2024 are as follows (amounts
in thousands):
Operating Leases
Finance Leases
Amounts To
Be Received
From
Subleases
Net
Payments
2025 ........................................................................... $
8,047
$
131
$
(3,503)
$
4,675
2026 ...........................................................................
7,239
133
(3,006)
4,366
2027 ...........................................................................
6,698
134
(2,715)
4,117
2028 ...........................................................................
6,786
135
(2,723)
4,198
2029 ...........................................................................
6,850
137
(2,731)
4,256
Thereafter...................................................................
175,000
4,245
(39,584)
139,661 (1)
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments........... $
210,620
$
4,915
$
(54,262)
$
161,273
Less: interest..............................................................
(132,035)
(2,979)
Present value of lease liabilities................................. $
78,585
$
1,936
(1)
Reflects certain ground leases, in which we are the lessee, that have longer initial fixed terms than our existing sublease to
our tenants. However, we would expect to either renew the related sublease, enter into a lease with a new tenant, or
attempt to early terminate the ground lease to reduce or avoid any significant impact from such ground leases.
Supplemental balance sheet information is as follows (in thousands, except lease terms and discount rate):
Balance Sheet
Classification
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
Right of use assets:
Operating leases - real estate ...................
Land
$
46,881
$
63,675
Finance leases - real estate.......................
Land
1,632
1,683
Total real estate right of use assets ........
$
48,513
$
65,358
Operating leases - corporate ....................
Other assets
20,701
24,243
Total right of use assets .............................
$
69,214
$
89,601
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases.......................................
Obligations to tenants and
other lease liabilities
$
78,585
$
101,812
Financing leases.......................................
Obligations to tenants and
other lease liabilities
1,936
1,938
Total lease liabilities ..................................
$
80,521
$
103,750
Weighted-average remaining lease
term:
Operating leases.......................................
32.6
32.9
Finance leases ..........................................
31.9
32.9
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases.......................................
6.1%
6.2%
Finance leases ..........................................
6.6%
6.6%

116
The following is supplemental cash flow information (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows used for operating leases ...................................................... $
8,447
$
8,210
$
7,169
Operating cash flows used for finance leases..........................................................
130
129
128
Non-cash activities - Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease
obligations:
Operating leases ......................................................................................................
—
—
23,066
12. Other Assets
The following is a summary of our other assets on our consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
As of December 31,
2024
2023
Debt issue costs, net(1)............................................................................................
$
5,675
$
8,513
Other corporate assets..............................................................................................
330,638
275,688
Prepaids and other assets.........................................................................................
135,091
173,710
Total other assets ...................................................................................................
$
471,404
$
457,911
(1) Relates to our revolving credit facility
Other corporate assets include building, land and land improvements associated with our corporate offices, furniture and
fixtures, equipment, corporate vehicles, aircraft, enterprise and other software, deposits, and right-of-use assets associated with
corporate leases. Included in prepaids and other assets is prepaid insurance, prepaid taxes, deferred income tax assets (net of valuation
allowances, if any), non-tenant receivables, derivative assets, and lease incentives provided to tenants, among other items.
Other corporate assets increased in 2024 primarily due to additional funding of our new corporate headquarters. Prepaids and
other assets decreased in 2024 primarily due to a reduction in the value of our interest rate swaps as further discussed in Note 4 and
the Norwood cash recovery from our casualty insurers in November 2024, partially offset by an increase in prepaid interest at
December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023.
13. Segment Disclosures
We manage our business and report financial results as one business segment. This is consistent with the manner in which our
chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), our executive team made up of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business.
Our primary business strategy and source of revenue is from the acquisition and development of healthcare facilities that are
leased to healthcare operating companies under long-term net leases, which require the tenant to bear most of the costs associated with
the property. The majority of our leased assets are owned 100%; however, we do own some leased assets through joint ventures with
other partners. We also may make mortgage loans to healthcare operators collateralized by their real estate. In addition, we may make
noncontrolling investments in our tenants, from time-to-time, typically in conjunction with larger real estate transactions with the
tenant, which may enhance our overall return and provide for certain minority rights and protections. Although we generate our
revenues from these investments in the U.S. and eight other countries across multiple property types, we centrally manage these
business activities on a consolidated basis. The accounting policies of our business segment are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies.
The CODM evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business on a consolidated basis using
consolidated net income from our consolidated statements of net income as our primary GAAP profit measure supplemented by
consolidated funds from operations ("FFO"). We use net income and FFO to monitor expected versus actual results to assess
performance. The measure of segment assets is total assets as reported on our consolidated balance sheets. We compute FFO in
accordance with the definition provided by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, which represents consolidated
net (loss) income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate and impairment charges on
real estate assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, including amortization related to in-place lease intangibles, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Given FFO excludes real estate related depreciation and amortization expense by definition and due to our typical net lease
structure which requires our tenants to bear most of the costs associated with our properties (including property taxes, insurance, etc.),

117
the primary expenses reviewed by the CODM include general and administrative and interest expenses from our consolidated
statements of net income.
See "Concentration of Credit Risks" in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for entity-wide disclosures around major
customers, geographic areas, and property types.
14. Subsequent Events
Senior Secured Notes due 2032
On February 13, 2025, we closed on a private offering that consisted of a $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior
secured notes due 2032 (the "USD Notes") and €1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2032 (the "Euro
Notes"). Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on August
15, 2025. The USD Notes were issued at 98.710% of par value, pay interest at a rate of 8.500% per year and mature on February 15,
2032. The Euro Notes were issued at 98.645% of par value, pay interest at a rate of 7.000% per year and mature on February 15, 2032.
We may redeem some or all of the notes at any time prior to February 15, 2028, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount, plus an applicable “make whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest. On or after February 15, 2028, we may redeem
some or all of the notes at a premium that will decrease over time. In addition, at any time prior to February 15, 2028, we may redeem
up to 40% of the notes at a redemption price equal to 108.500% and 107.000% for the USD Notes and Euro Notes, respectively, of the
aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, using proceeds from one or more equity offerings. In the
event of a change in control, each holder of the notes may require us to repurchase some or all of the notes at a repurchase price equal
to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.
We used the net proceeds from the notes to fund the redemption of our 3.325% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025, 2.500%
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026, and 5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026. We used the remaining net proceeds to pay down
the revolving portion of our Credit Facility.

118
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Medical Properties Trust, Inc. maintains disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management,
including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance
of achieving the desired control objectives. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the management of Medical
Properties Trust, Inc., with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The management of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
GAAP.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting for Medical
Properties Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 2024 based upon the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment,
management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the internal control over financial reporting for Medical Properties
Trust, Inc. was effective.
The effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. as of December 31,
2024 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their
report which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in the internal control over financial
reporting for Medical Properties Trust, Inc. during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. maintains disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management,
including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), as
appropriate, of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (the sole general partner of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.) to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. As
required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the management of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., with the participation of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (the sole general partner of MPT Operating
Partnership, L.P.), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (the sole general partner of MPT Operating
Partnership, L.P.) concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.

119
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The management of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting for MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act).
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in
accordance with GAAP.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting for MPT
Operating Partnership, L.P. as of December 31, 2024, based upon the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment,
management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the internal control over financial reporting for MPT Operating
Partnership, L.P. was effective.
The effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting for MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. as of December 31, 2024
has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in the internal control over financial
reporting for MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. Other Information
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, none of our officers or directors (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the
Exchange Act) adopted, terminated, or modified any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that
was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined
in Item 408 of Regulation S-K).
ITEM 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.

120
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The Company has an insider trading policy governing the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of the Company's securities that
applies to all of the Company's directors, officers, employees, and other covered persons. The Company believes that its insider
trading policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and listing standards
applicable to the Company. It is also the policy of the Company to comply with all insider trading laws and regulations. A copy of the
Company's insider trading policy is listed as Exhibit 19.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed by us with the Commission not later than April 30, 2025.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed by us with the Commission not later than April 30, 2025.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed by us with the Commission not later than April 30, 2025.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed by us with the Commission not later than April 30, 2025.
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our independent public accounting firm is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Birmingham, Alabama, PCAOB Auditor ID 238. The
information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which will be filed by us with the Commission not later than April 30, 2025.

121
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Index of Financial Statements of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. which are included in
Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
64
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
67
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
70
Consolidated Statements of Net Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
71
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
72
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
73
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
74
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
75
Consolidated Statements of Net Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
76
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
77
Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
78
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
79
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
80
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
127
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2024 with reconciliations for the years ended
December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
128
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate at December 31, 2024 with reconciliations for the years ended
December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
136
(b) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
Form
File Number
Exhibit
Number
Filing Date
3.1
Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Medical
Properties Trust, Inc.
S-11/A
333-119957
3.1
January 6, 2005
3.2
Articles of Amendment of Second Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
10-Q
001-32559
3.1
November 10,
2005
3.3
Articles of Amendment of Second Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
January 13, 2009
3.4
Articles of Amendment to Second Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
January 31, 2012
3.5
Articles of Amendment to Second Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
June 26, 2015
3.6
Articles of Amendment to Second Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
10-Q
001-32559
3.2
August 10, 2015
3.7
Articles of Amendment to the Second Articles of
Amendment and Restatement of Medical Properties Trust,
Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
November 8, 2019
3.8
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Medical Properties
Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
November 24,
2009
3.9
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.2
June 26, 2015

122
3.10
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
November 16,
2016
3.11
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
February 22, 2017
3.12
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
May 25, 2018
3.13
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
8-K
001-32559
3.1
May 22, 2020
4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate
S-11/A
333-119957
4.1
January 6, 2005
4.2
Description of Securities of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act,
as amended
10-K
001-32559
4.2
February 27, 2020
4.3
Indenture, dated as of October 10, 2013, among Medical
Properties Trust, Inc., MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., MPT
Finance Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors and
Wilmington Trust, N.A., as Trustee.
8-K
001-32559
4.1
October 16, 2013
4.4
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 21,
2017, by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and
MPT Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties
Trust, Inc., as parent and guarantor, and Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as trustee.
10-Q
001-32559
4.1
November 9, 2017
4.5
Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 26, 2019,
by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., and MPT
Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties Trust,
Inc., as parent and guarantor, and Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as trustee.
8-K
001-32559
4.2
July 29, 2019
4.6
Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 5,
2019, by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and
MPT Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties
Trust, Inc., as parent and guarantor, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as trustee, Elavon Financial Services
DAC, U.K. Branch, as initial paying agent, and Elavon
Financial Services DAC, as initial registrar and transfer
agent.
8-K
001-32559
4.4
December 11,
2019
4.7
Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 4,
2020, by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and
MPT Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties
Trust, Inc. as parent and guarantor, and Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as trustee.
8-K
001-32559
4.2
December 7, 2020
4.8
Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 24,
2021, by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and
MPT Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties
Trust, Inc., as parent and guarantor, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as trustee, and Elavon Financial
Services DAC, as initial paying agent, registrar and transfer
agent
8-K
001-32559
4.4
March 29, 2021
4.9
Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 6,
2021, by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and
MPT Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties
Trust, Inc., as parent and guarantor, Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as trustee, and Elavon Financial
Services DAC, as initial paying agent, registrar and transfer
agent
8-K
001-32559
4.2
October 13, 2021
4.10
Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2025, among Medical
Properties Trust, Inc., MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., MPT
Finance Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto,
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, dollar
paying agent, dollar registrar, dollar transfer agent and notes
collateral agent, and U.S. Bank Europe DAC, as euro paying
agent, euro registrar and euro transfer agent
8-K
001-32559
4.1
February 18, 2025

123
4.11*
Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 28,
2025, among MPT Springstone REIT, Inc., as subsidiary
guarantor, and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. and MPT
Finance Corporation, as issuers, Medical Properties Trust,
Inc., as parent and guarantor, and Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as trustee
10.1
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
8-K
001-32559
10.1
August 6, 2007
10.2
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. Amended and Restated 2019
Equity Incentive Plan***
DEF 14A
001-32559
A
April 28, 2022
10.3
Form of Stock Option Award***
8-K
001-32559
10.2
October 18, 2005
10.4
Form of Restricted Stock Award***
8-K
001-32559
10.4
October 18, 2005
10.5
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award***
8-K
001-32559
10.5
October 18, 2005
10.6
Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock***
8-K
001-32559
10.1
December 14,
2023
10.7
Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units***
8-K
001-32559
10.1
March 14, 2024
10.8
Employment Agreement between Medical Properties Trust,
Inc. and Edward K. Aldag, Jr., dated September 10, 2003***
S-11/A
333-119957
10.3
January 6, 2005
10.9
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Edward K. Aldag, Jr.,
dated March 8, 2004***
S-11/A
333-119957
10.4
January 6, 2005
10.10
Employment Agreement between Medical Properties Trust,
Inc. and R. Steven Hamner, dated September 10, 2003***
S-11/A
333-119957
10.6
January 6, 2005
10.11
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Medical
Properties Trust, Inc. and executive officers and directors***
S-11/A
333-119957
10.55
July 5, 2005
10.12
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Edward K. Aldag, Jr.,
dated September 29, 2006***
10-K
001-32559
10.58
March 14, 2008
10.13
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and R. Steven Hamner, dated
September 29, 2006***
10-K
001-32559
10.59
March 14, 2008
10.14
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Richard S. Hamner, dated
January 1, 2008***
10-K
001-32559
10.76
March 13, 2009
10.15
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and R. Steven Hamner, dated
January 1, 2009***
10-K
001-32559
10.77
March 13, 2009
10.16
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Edward K. Aldag, Jr.,
dated January 1, 2008***
10-K
001-32559
10.78
March 13, 2009
10.17
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement between
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and Edward K. Aldag, Jr.,
dated January 1, 2009***
10-K
001-32559
10.79
March 13, 2009
10.18
Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement dated as of
June 7, 2018 by and among MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.,
Primotop Holding, S.a.r.l. and MPT RHM Holdco S.a.r.l.
10-Q
001-32559
10.1
August 9, 2018
10.19
Real Property Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July
10, 2019, by and among Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc., as
“Prospect Medical Holdings”, and subsidiaries of Prospect
Medical Holdings, as the “Prospect Medical Subsidiaries”,
and subsidiaries of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., as the
“MPT Parties”.
10-Q
001-32559
10.2
November 12,
2019
10.20
Form of Lease Agreement between certain subsidiaries of
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., as Lessor, and Circle
Health Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries, as Lessee
10-Q
001-32559
10.1
August 7, 2020
10.21
Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term
Loan Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2022, among Medical
Properties Trust, Inc., MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., the
several lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of
8-K
001-32559
1.1
July 6, 2022

124
America, N.A., as syndication agent, and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
10.22
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
April 12, 2024, by and among Medical Properties Trust, Inc.,
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., the several lenders from
time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
syndication agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
administrative agent
10-Q
001-32559
10.1
August 9, 2024
10.23
Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
August 6, 2024, by and among Medical Properties Trust, Inc.,
MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., the Guarantors party
hereto, the several lenders from time to time party thereto,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
10-Q/A
001-32559
10.1
November 13,
2024
10.24
Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
February 13, 2025, by and among Medical Properties Trust,
Inc., MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., the Guarantors party
hereto, the several lenders from time to time party thereto,
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
8-K
001-32559
10.1
February 18, 2025
19.1
Compensation Recovery Policy
10-K
001-32559
19.1
February 29, 2024
19.2
Insider Trading Policy
10-K
001-32559
19.2
February 29, 2024
21.1*
Subsidiaries of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
23.1*
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
31.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(Medical Properties Trust, Inc.)
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-
14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (Medical
Properties Trust, Inc.)
31.3*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (MPT
Operating Partnership, L.P.)
31.4*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-
14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (MPT
Operating Partnership, L.P.)
32.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. (Medical Properties Trust, Inc.)
32.2**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. (MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.)
Exhibit
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema With Embedded
Linkbase Documents
104
Cover page interactive data file (Formatted as Inline XBRL
with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in
Exhibits 101.)
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
*** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

125
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.

126
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrants have duly caused this Report to be
signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.
By: /s/ J. Kevin Hanna
J. Kevin Hanna
Senior Vice President, Controller, Assistant Treasurer, and
Chief Accounting Officer
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By: /s/ J. Kevin Hanna
J. Kevin Hanna
Senior Vice President, Controller, Assistant Treasurer, and
Chief Accounting Officer of the sole member of the general
partner of MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
Date: March 3, 2025
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below does hereby constitute and appoint
J. Kevin Hanna and R. Steven Hamner, and each of them singly, as her or his true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and
each of them singly, to sign for such person and in her or his name in the capacity indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Annual Report on Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in her or his name
and in her or his capacity as officer and director to enable the registrants to comply with the provisions of the Exchange Act, and all
requirements of the SEC in connection therewith, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said
attorneys, or any of them, to said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the
registrants and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 3, 2025
/s/ R. Steven Hamner
R. Steven Hamner
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 3, 2025
/s/ G. Steven Dawson
G. Steven Dawson
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ Caterina A. Mozingo
Caterina A. Mozingo
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ Emily W. Murphy
Emily W. Murphy
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ Elizabeth N. Pitman
Elizabeth N. Pitman
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ Michael G. Stewart
Michael G. Stewart
Director
March 3, 2025
/s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, III
C. Reynolds Thompson, III
Director
March 3, 2025

127
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. and MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.
December 31, 2024
Additions
Deductions
Year Ended December 31,
Balance at
Beginning of
Year(1)
Charged
Against
Operations(1)
Charged to
Other Accounts
Net
Recoveries/
Write-offs(1)
Balance at
End of Year(1)
(In thousands)
2024 .............................. $
878,318
$
2,783,001 (2)
$
—
$ (1,495,565) (3)
$
2,165,754
2023 .............................. $
393,057
$
755,627 (4)
$
—
$
(270,366) (5)
$
878,318
2022 .............................. $
154,161
$
294,861 (6)
$
—
$
(55,965) (7)
$
393,057
(1) Includes real estate impairment reserves, allowances for doubtful accounts, straight-line rent reserves, credit loss reserves, tax
valuation allowances, and other reserves.
(2) Represents $1.5 billion increase in credit loss reserves on loans and financing-type investments (primarily related to Steward
and Prospect as further described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and negative fair value adjustment
on our investment in the international joint venture, $86 million increase to real estate impairment reserves, approximately
$500 million increase to equity investment impairment reserves, and a $384 million increase in accounts receivable reserves.
Also includes an approximately $302 million increase in valuation allowances to reserve against our net deferred tax assets in
2024.
(3) Includes a $520 million decrease in accounts receivable reserves and $826 million decrease in credit loss reserves on loans
(primarily related to the full release of our claims in Steward as a result of the global settlement), along with a $138 million
decrease to our equity investment reserves (primarily related to the write-off of our Steward equity investment), and a $12
million decrease in real estate impairment reserves related to disposals in 2024.
(4) Represents $261 million increase in accounts receivable reserves, $259 million increase in straight-line rent receivable
reserves, $90 million increase to equity investment impairment reserves, and $89 million increase to real estate impairment
reserves, as further described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Also includes an increase of $10
million in credit loss reserves and an approximately $47 million increase in valuation allowances to reserve against our net
deferred tax assets in 2023.
(5) Includes a $170 million decrease in real estate impairment reserves, an approximately $35 million decrease in credit loss
reserves related to transitioning properties back to a tenant in exchange for a first-lien mortgage, and a $50 million recovery
of previously reserved interest satisfied as part of the “Prospect Transaction” as disclosed in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Also includes an approximately $11 million write-off of previously reserved accounts receivable.
(6) Represents a $170.6 million increase to real estate impairment reserves, $0.5 million increase in accounts receivable and
other reserves, $114.0 million increase in credit loss reserves on financing-type receivables, and a $9.8 million increase in
valuation allowance to reserve against our net deferred tax assets in 2022.
(7) Includes a $2.9 million decrease in real estate impairment reserves related to disposals in 2022, a $11.7 million decrease in
accounts receivable and other reserves, a net credit loss recovery of approximately $15 million on the Watsonville loans, and
a $26.4 million decrease of credit loss reserves related to financial instruments sold, repaid, or satisfied in 2022.

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2024
Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Aberdeen, UK............................
Acute care general hospital
$
4,180
$
99,020
$
—
$
—
$
4,180
$
99,020
$ 103,200
$
12,419
$
44,407
1985
January 9, 2020
40
Algeciras, Spain ..........................
Acute care general hospital
488
7,712
—
—
488
7,712
8,200
566
—
1997
April 29, 2022
40
Altoona, WI..............................
Acute care general hospital
—
29,062
—
—
—
29,062
29,062
7,508
—
2014
August 31, 2014
40
Altrincham, UK ..........................
Behavioral health facility
14,396
24,713
—
—
14,396
24,713
39,109
1,565
—
1890, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
Alvin, TX................................
Freestanding ER
105
4,087
—
—
105
4,087
4,192
1,075
—
2014
March 19, 2014
40
Arnold, UK ..............................
Behavioral health facility
469
9,749
—
—
469
9,749
10,218
936
—
2008
June 25, 2021
40
Ashtead, UK .............................
Acute care general hospital
37,124
69,603
—
—
37,124
69,603
106,727
9,699
—
1981
August 16, 2019
40
Austin, TX ...............................
Freestanding ER
3,557
4,200
—
—
3,557
4,200
7,757
850
—
2017
March 2, 2017
40
Avondale, AZ ............................
Behavioral health facility
5,383
64,650
470
—
5,383
65,120
70,503
5,563
—
2016
October 19, 2021
40
Ayr, UK..................................
Behavioral health facility
16,703
47,833
—
—
16,703
47,833
64,536
4,274
—
2004
June 25, 2021
40
Bad Salzuflen, Germany ..................
Rehabilitation hospital
9,852
24,931
—
—
9,852
24,931
34,783
4,815
—
1974, 2016
November 30, 2017
40
Bad Salzuflen, Germany ..................
Rehabilitation hospital
6,695
21,926
—
—
6,695
21,926
28,621
4,033
—
1989, 2016
November 30, 2017
40
Bad Oeynhausen, Germany................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,056
2,581
—
—
1,056
2,581
3,637
511
—
1973, 2010
November 30, 2017
40
Bakersfield, CA ..........................
Rehabilitation hospital
2,178
45,253
—
—
2,178
45,253
47,431
3,205
—
2022
May 15, 2020
40
Barby, Germany..........................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,708
19,057
—
—
1,708
19,057
20,765
927
—
1995
April 19, 2023
40
Basingstoke, UK..........................
Acute care general hospital
12,704
49,342
—
—
12,704
49,342
62,046
6,230
31,595
1984
January 9, 2020
40
Bassenheim, Germany ....................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,046
4,961
—
—
1,046
4,961
6,007
814
—
1887, 1983
February 9, 2019
39
Bath, UK.................................
Acute care general hospital
1,483
30,749
—
—
1,483
30,749
32,232
8,072
—
2008, 2009
July 1, 2014
40
Bath, UK.................................
Acute care general hospital
7,072
12,833
—
—
7,072
12,833
19,905
1,667
15,164
1992
January 9, 2020
40
Beckenham, UK..........................
Acute care general hospital
5,369
20,594
—
—
5,369
20,594
25,963
2,591
14,629
1981
January 9, 2020
40
Bedford, UK .............................
Acute care general hospital
1,514
7,416
—
—
1,514
7,416
8,930
939
7,885
1982
January 9, 2020
40
Bellflower, CA ...........................
Behavioral health facility
2,563
—
—
—
2,563
—
2,563
—
—
N/A
August 23, 2019
—
Big Spring, TX...........................
Acute care general hospital
1,655
21,254
815
—
1,655
22,069
23,724
3,485
—
1973
April 12, 2019
41
Birmingham, UK .........................
Behavioral health facility
912
9,988
—
—
912
9,988
10,900
449
—
1864, 2009
April 14, 2023
40
Birmingham, UK .........................
Acute care general hospital
7,870
41,503
—
—
7,870
41,503
49,373
4,669
—
2017
April 3, 2017
40
Birmingham, UK .........................
Acute care general hospital
9,695
92,282
—
—
9,695
92,282
101,977
11,655
—
1982
January 9, 2020
40
Birmingham, UK .........................
Rehabilitation hospital
—
17,067
—
—
—
17,067
17,067
1,920
—
2018
June 29, 2020
40
Birmingham, UK .........................
Behavioral health facility
405
18,840
—
—
405
18,840
19,245
1,767
—
1900, 1984, 2016
June 25, 2021
40
Blackburn, UK ...........................
Acute care general hospital
2,616
50,140
—
—
2,616
50,140
52,756
6,305
23,300
1957
January 9, 2020
40
Blackburn, UK ...........................
Behavioral health facility
19,692
53,421
—
—
19,692
53,421
73,113
5,125
—
1930
June 25, 2021
40
Blue Springs, MO ........................
Acute care general hospital
4,347
23,494
—
—
4,347
23,494
27,841
6,120
—
1980
February 13, 2015
40
Boardman, OH ...........................
Long term acute care
hospital
79
275
—
—
79
275
354
41
—
2008
August 30, 2019
40
Boise, ID.................................
Long term acute care
hospital
1,558
11,027
—
—
1,558
11,027
12,585
1,555
—
2008
February 29, 2012
50
Bolton, UK...............................
Acute care general hospital
1,558
43,781
—
—
1,558
43,781
45,339
5,491
20,817
1989
January 9, 2020
40
128

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Bossier City, LA.........
Long term acute care hospital
900
17,818
944
—
900
18,762
19,662
7,648
—
1982
April 1, 2008
40
Bowling Green, KY......
Rehabilitation hospital
3,486
56,296
3,550
—
3,486
59,846
63,332
8,586
—
1992
August 30, 2019
40
Brandis, Germany .......
Rehabilitation hospital
2,079
22,882
—
—
2,079
22,882
24,961
1,141
—
1995
April 19, 2023
40
Braunfels, Germany......
Acute care general hospital
2,040
12,707
—
—
2,040
12,707
14,747
3,051
—
1977
June 30, 2015
40
Bristol, UK..............
Behavioral health facility
4,626
36,724
—
—
4,626
36,724
41,350
2,052
—
1790, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
Bromley, UK............
Behavioral health facility
7,101
15,259
—
—
7,101
15,259
22,360
1,483
—
1714, 1830, 2021
June 25, 2021
40
Bury, UK................
Behavioral health facility
8,366
19,063
—
—
8,366
19,063
27,429
1,925
—
2003
June 25, 2021
40
Bussage, UK ............
Behavioral health facility
8,346
3,690
—
—
8,346
3,690
12,036
361
—
1970
June 25, 2021
40
Cadiz, Spain.............
Acute care general hospital
281
6,377
—
—
281
6,377
6,658
456
—
2000
April 29, 2022
40
Canterbury, UK..........
Acute care general hospital
9,030
27,124
—
—
9,030
27,124
36,154
3,418
18,894
1982
January 9, 2020
40
Carmarthen, UK.........
Acute care general hospital
895
25,144
—
—
895
25,144
26,039
3,174
14,884
1990
January 9, 2020
40
Carrollton, TX...........
Behavioral health facility
4,941
52,227
—
—
4,941
52,227
57,168
4,514
—
2012
October 19, 2021
40
Casper, WY .............
Rehabilitation hospital
1,632
—
—
—
1,632
—
1,632
—
—
2012
February 29, 2012
—
Caterham, UK...........
Acute care general hospital
10,374
20,494
—
—
10,374
20,494
30,868
2,897
—
1982
August 16, 2019
40
Cayce, SC...............
Rehabilitation hospital
1,022
20,419
—
—
1,022
20,419
21,441
766
—
2023
October 21, 2022
40
Cheadle, UK ............
Acute care general hospital
30,414
160,210
—
—
30,414
160,210
190,624
20,151
105,255
1981
January 9, 2020
40
Cheadle, UK ............
Behavioral health facility
29,311
93,207
—
—
29,311
93,207
122,518
8,826
—
1849, 2018
June 25, 2021
40
Clarksville, TX..........
Rehabilitation hospital
2,460
25,540
—
—
2,460
25,540
28,000
2,840
—
2019
December 17, 2020
39
Cologne, Germany.......
Acute care general hospital
4,152
14,036
—
—
4,152
14,036
18,188
2,679
—
2011
June 23, 2017
40
Columbus, OH ..........
Behavioral health facility
2,101
44,218
—
—
2,101
44,218
46,319
3,859
—
2017
October 19, 2021
40
Conroe, TX..............
Behavioral health facility
3,855
38,892
—
—
3,855
38,892
42,747
3,468
—
2018
October 19, 2021
40
Converse, TX............
Freestanding ER
750
4,423
—
—
750
4,423
5,173
1,078
—
2015
April 10, 2015
40
Coral Gables, FL ........
Acute care general hospital
26,215
84,584
2,624
—
26,215
87,208
113,423
7,509
—
1959
August 1, 2021
40
Croydon, UK............
Acute care general hospital
9,775
41,002
—
—
9,775
41,002
50,777
5,192
25,157
1982
January 9, 2020
40
Dahlen, Germany........
Rehabilitation hospital
1,259
10,635
—
—
1,259
10,635
11,894
1,291
—
1994
July 8, 2020
40
Dallas, TX ..............
Long term acute care hospital
1,421
13,536
—
—
1,421
13,536
14,957
6,176
—
2006
September 5, 2006
40
Darlington, UK..........
Acute care general hospital
2,053
35,213
—
—
2,053
35,213
37,266
3,988
33,613
2001
August 7, 2020
40
Darlington, UK..........
Behavioral health facility
20,888
47,447
—
—
20,888
47,447
68,335
4,862
—
1935, 2018, 2020
June 25, 2021
40
Darlington, UK..........
Behavioral health facility
5,140
25,903
—
—
5,140
25,903
31,043
2,388
—
1960, 1990
June 25, 2021
40
Detroit, MI..............
Long term acute care hospital
1,220
8,323
—
—
1,220
8,323
9,543
3,511
—
1956
May 22, 2008
40
Dewsbury, UK ..........
Behavioral health facility
1,101
10,026
—
—
1,101
10,026
11,127
474
—
2012
April 14, 2023
40
Diss, UK................
Behavioral health facility
2,861
10,202
—
—
2,861
10,202
13,063
1,095
—
1840 (2)
June 25, 2021
40
Dorchester, UK..........
Acute care general hospital
530
30,812
—
—
530
30,812
31,342
3,870
—
1981
January 9, 2020
40
Dormagen, Germany.....
Rehabilitation hospital
1,791
5,298
—
—
1,791
5,298
7,089
892
—
1993, 2006
August 28, 2018
40
129

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Droitwich, UK...........
Acute care general hospital
75
15,040
—
—
75
15,040
15,115
1,905
—
1984
January 9, 2020
40
Dublin, OH..............
Behavioral health facility
5,118
69,346
—
—
5,118
69,346
74,464
5,931
—
2012
October 19, 2021
40
El Paso, TX .............
Rehabilitation hospital
4,268
21,345
—
—
4,268
21,345
25,613
2,479
—
2018
December 17, 2020
38
Englewood, CO..........
Behavioral health facility
3,369
65,480
—
—
3,369
65,480
68,849
5,648
—
2017
October 19, 2021
40
Essex, UK...............
Behavioral health facility
4,563
42,462
—
—
4,563
42,462
47,025
2,365
—
1790, 1992, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
Euxton, UK .............
Acute care general hospital
4,539
34,959
—
—
4,539
34,959
39,498
5,015
—
1981
August 16, 2019
40
Flagstaff, AZ............
Rehabilitation hospital
3,049
22,464
—
—
3,049
22,464
25,513
3,838
—
2016
August 23, 2016
40
Florence, AZ ............
Acute care general hospital
900
28,462
105
—
900
28,567
29,467
9,103
—
2012
February 7, 2012
40
Floridablanca, Colombia .
Acute care general hospital
717
22,411
—
—
717
22,411
23,128
1,367
—
1997
July 29, 2022
40
Folsom, CA .............
Long term acute care hospital
3,291
21,293
—
—
3,291
21,293
24,584
3,370
—
2009
August 30, 2019
40
Fort Worth, TX..........
Behavioral health facility
3,406
34,627
—
—
3,406
34,627
38,033
3,069
—
2014
October 19, 2021
40
Fresno, CA..............
Rehabilitation hospital
5,507
70,473
—
—
5,507
70,473
75,980
10,126
—
1991
August 30, 2019
40
Frome, UK..............
Behavioral health facility
2,847
17,249
—
—
2,847
17,249
20,096
1,703
—
1980
June 25, 2021
40
Frome, UK..............
Behavioral health facility
10,711
10,530
—
—
10,711
10,530
21,241
1,369
—
1700, 2015, 2017
June 25, 2021
40
Gainesborough, UK......
Behavioral health facility
1,503
9,838
—
—
1,503
9,838
11,341
580
—
2008
April 14, 2023
40
Gardena, CA ............
Acute care general hospital
14,010
65,282
—
—
14,010
65,282
79,292
6,174
—
1966
July 6, 2021
40
Georgetown, TX.........
Behavioral health facility
4,569
23,550
10,561
—
4,569
34,111
38,680
2,283
—
2014
October 19, 2021
40
Gilbert, AZ..............
Behavioral health facility
4,790
45,076
5,411
—
4,790
50,487
55,277
3,821
—
2020
October 19, 2021
40
Glasgow, UK............
Acute care general hospital
6,333
129,348
—
—
6,333
129,348
135,681
16,214
67,611
1983
January 9, 2020
40
Glasgow, UK............
Behavioral health facility
1,405
15,356
—
—
1,405
15,356
16,761
1,456
—
1900, 1980
June 25, 2021
40
Gloucester, UK..........
Acute care general hospital
5,486
60,337
—
—
5,486
60,337
65,823
8,521
—
1990
August 16, 2019
40
Godalming, UK..........
Behavioral health facility
9,198
18,660
—
—
9,198
18,660
27,858
1,893
—
1796, 2007
June 25, 2021
40
Great Missenden, UK....
Acute care general hospital
11,571
103,391
—
—
11,571
103,391
114,962
13,026
54,064
1981
January 9, 2020
40
Grefath, Germany........
Rehabilitation hospital
1,126
2,841
—
—
1,126
2,841
3,967
488
—
1886, 1983
August 28, 2018
40
Guildford, UK...........
Acute care general hospital
6,765
35,812
—
—
6,765
35,812
42,577
4,516
21,507
1989
January 9, 2020
40
Halsall, UK..............
Acute care general hospital
1,980
30,633
—
—
1,980
30,633
32,613
4,338
—
1986
August 16, 2019
40
Harrow, UK.............
Acute care general hospital
37,755
39,733
—
—
37,755
39,733
77,488
5,035
—
1980
January 9, 2020
40
Hartsville, SC ...........
Acute care general hospital
2,050
43,970
—
—
2,050
43,970
46,020
11,918
—
1999
August 31, 2015
34
Hassocks, UK ...........
Behavioral health facility
5,392
28,190
—
—
5,392
28,190
33,582
3,032
—
1998
June 25, 2021
40
Hastings, PA ............
Acute care general hospital
603
8,834
—
—
603
8,834
9,437
1,816
—
1924
December 17, 2019
30
Hausman, TX............
Acute care general hospital
1,500
8,957
—
—
1,500
8,957
10,457
2,632
—
2013
March 1, 2013
40
Heidelberg, Germany ....
Rehabilitation hospital
5,850
33,415
—
—
5,850
33,415
39,265
7,139
—
1885, 1991
June 22, 2016
40
Helotes, TX .............
Freestanding ER
1,900
5,115
—
—
1,900
5,115
7,015
1,130
—
2016
March 10, 2016
40
Helsinki, Finland ........
Acute care general hospital
3,832
63,268
494
—
3,832
63,762
67,594
4,471
—
1992, 2013
March 11, 2022
40
Hemel Hempstead, UK...
Behavioral health facility
12,279
6,197
—
—
12,279
6,197
18,476
757
—
1901, 1990
June 25, 2021
40
Hialeah, FL..............
Acute care general hospital
18,802
107,783
3,324
—
18,802
111,107
129,909
9,780
—
1950
August 1, 2021
40
Hialeah, FL..............
Acute care general hospital
75,339
222,271
1,958
—
75,339
224,229
299,568
21,712
—
1969
August 1, 2021
40
Highland Hills, OH ......
Behavioral health facility
3,148
43,891
—
—
3,148
43,891
47,039
3,832
—
2015
October 19, 2021
40
130

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Hill County, TX...........................
Acute care general hospital
1,120
17,882
845
—
1,120
18,727
19,847
17,480
—
1980
September 17, 2010
15
Hinckley, UK.............................
Behavioral health facility
2,424
16,521
—
—
2,424
16,521
18,945
1,566
—
1892, 2007
June 25, 2021
40
Hook, UK ................................
Behavioral health facility
5,324
10,141
—
—
5,324
10,141
15,465
1,045
—
1980
June 25, 2021
40
Hoover, AL...............................
Freestanding ER
—
7,581
—
—
—
7,581
7,581
2,140
—
2015
May 1, 2015
34
Hoover, AL...............................
Freestanding ER
—
1,034
296
—
—
1,330
1,330
348
—
2015
May 1, 2015
34
Hot Springs, AR ..........................
Acute care general hospital
5,622
59,432
21,221
—
5,622
80,653
86,275
19,450
—
1985
August 31, 2015
40
Houston, TX..............................
Behavioral health facility
6,063
19,881
2,565
—
6,063
22,446
28,509
2,245
—
2020
October 25, 2019
40
Houston, TX..............................
Acute care general hospital
28,687
80,168
90,934
—
28,687
171,102
199,789
20,251
—
1940-1950
September 29, 2017
41
Houston, TX..............................
Freestanding ER
950
3,996
—
—
950
3,996
4,946
824
—
2016
September 26, 2016
40
Houston, TX..............................
Acute care general hospital
3,274
27,324
32,499
—
3,274
59,823
63,097
22,782
—
1960
August 10, 2007
40
Huntington Park, CA......................
Acute care general hospital
3,132
5,002
—
—
3,132
5,002
8,134
540
—
1967
July 6, 2021
40
Huntington Park, CA......................
Acute care general hospital
3,935
6,103
—
—
3,935
6,103
10,038
645
—
1960-1969
July 6, 2021
40
Idaho Falls, ID............................
Acute care general hospital
1,822
37,467
67,951
—
1,822
105,418
107,240
19,747
—
2002
April 1, 2008
40
Idaho Falls, ID............................
Acute care general hospital
1,880
108,303
5,590
—
1,880
113,893
115,773
13,216
—
2020
December 19, 2017
40
Johnstown, PA............................
Acute care general hospital
8,877
247,158
—
—
8,877
247,158
256,035
41,793
—
1924
December 17, 2019
30
Kansas City, KS...........................
Acute care general hospital
2,351
13,665
—
—
2,351
13,665
16,016
1,650
—
2017
June 10, 2019
50
Kansas City, MO..........................
Acute care general hospital
10,497
64,419
—
—
10,497
64,419
74,916
16,279
—
1978
February 13, 2015
40
Katy, TX .................................
Freestanding ER
1,512
2,870
—
—
1,512
2,870
4,382
841
—
2016
October 10, 2016
40
Kuhlungsborn, Germany...................
Rehabilitation hospital
6,292
16,179
—
—
6,292
16,179
22,471
732
—
1998
June 1, 2023
40
Kuopio, Finland...........................
Acute care general hospital
1,212
40,662
—
—
1,212
40,662
41,874
3,015
—
2017
March 11, 2022
29
Lafayette, IN..............................
Rehabilitation hospital
800
14,968
(25)
—
800
14,943
15,743
4,442
—
2013
February 1, 2013
40
Lafayette, IN..............................
Behavioral health facility
2,829
10,795
—
—
2,829
10,795
13,624
1,143
—
2012
October 19, 2021
40
Lander, WY ..............................
Acute care general hospital
758
42,849
—
—
758
42,849
43,607
5,724
—
1983
December 17, 2019
40
Lauderdale Lakes, FL .....................
Acute care general hospital
10,657
150,313
2,168
—
10,657
152,481
163,138
14,581
—
1975
August 1, 2021
40
Lawton, OK ..............................
Acute care general hospital
3,944
63,031
—
—
3,944
63,031
66,975
8,462
—
1985
December 17, 2019
40
League City, TX ..........................
Freestanding ER
1,260
3,901
—
—
1,260
3,901
5,161
927
—
2015
June 19, 2015
40
Leawood, KS .............................
Acute care general hospital
2,513
13,938
—
—
2,513
13,938
16,451
1,672
—
2017
June 10, 2019
50
Leeds, UK................................
Behavioral health facility
2,241
9,360
—
—
2,241
9,360
11,601
916
—
1990
June 25, 2021
40
Lewiston, ID..............................
Acute care general hospital
5,389
75,435
—
—
5,389
75,435
80,824
19,557
—
1922
May 1, 2017
40
London, UK ..............................
Acute care general hospital
9,087
59,974
—
—
9,087
59,974
69,061
7,522
37,593
1984
January 9, 2020
40
London, UK ..............................
Behavioral health facility
35,654
51,030
—
—
35,654
51,030
86,684
2,858
—
1811, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
London, UK ..............................
Acute care general hospital
3,229
4,078
—
—
3,229
4,078
7,307
518
—
1987
January 9, 2020
40
London, UK ..............................
Behavioral health facility
28,447
14,719
—
—
28,447
14,719
43,166
940
—
1790, 1992, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
London, UK ..............................
Acute care general hospital
12,241
79,894
—
—
12,241
79,894
92,135
9,995
41,283
1977
January 9, 2020
40
London, UK ..............................
Behavioral health facility
6,057
15,390
—
—
6,057
15,390
21,447
1,481
—
1900, 1960
June 25, 2021
40
131

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
London, UK...............................
Behavioral health facility
13,577
6,695
—
—
13,577
6,695
20,272
671
—
1992
June 25, 2021
40
Los Angeles, CA..........................
Acute care general hospital
12,562
40,164
394
—
12,562
40,558
53,120
3,631
—
1972
July 6, 2021
40
Lubbock, TX..............................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,376
28,292
3,648
—
1,376
31,940
33,316
7,530
—
2008
June 16, 2015
40
Malaga, SP................................
Acute care general hospital
702
10,991
—
—
702
10,991
11,693
748
—
2018
April 29, 2022
40
Mandeville, LA ...........................
Freestanding ER
2,800
5,370
—
—
2,800
5,370
8,170
1,096
—
2016
October 28, 2016
40
Marrero, LA ..............................
Freestanding ER
1,539
5,801
—
—
1,539
5,801
7,340
1,233
—
2016
July 15, 2016
40
McKinney, TX............................
Freestanding ER
2,500
4,060
—
—
2,500
4,060
6,560
1,285
—
2015
July 31, 2015
30
McKinney, TX............................
Behavioral health facility
2,934
32,268
—
—
2,934
32,268
35,202
605
—
N/A
October 19, 2021
-
McMinnville, OR .........................
Acute care general hospital
5,000
97,900
—
—
5,000
97,900
102,900
21,619
—
1996
August 31, 2015
41
Melton Mowbray, UK .....................
Behavioral health facility
5,605
15,712
—
—
5,605
15,712
21,317
1,573
—
1990
June 25, 2021
40
Mesa, AZ.................................
Acute care general hospital
6,140
99,275
4,152
—
6,140
103,427
109,567
30,110
—
2007
September 26, 2013
40
Mesa, AZ.................................
Acute care general hospital
2,604
16,400
—
—
2,604
16,400
19,004
1,131
—
2019
April 18, 2022
40
Meyersdale, PA ...........................
Acute care general hospital
390
4,280
—
—
390
4,280
4,670
913
—
1960
December 17, 2019
30
Miami, FL ................................
Acute care general hospital
44,400
107,203
3,440
—
44,400
110,643
155,043
11,471
—
1955
August 1, 2021
40
Miami, FL ................................
Acute care general hospital
20,430
15,750
10,947
—
20,430
26,697
47,127
2,281
—
1958, 1962, 1988,
2016
April 25, 2022
40
Milton Keynes, UK........................
Acute care general hospital
5,157
35,255
—
—
5,157
35,255
40,412
4,436
—
1983
January 9, 2020
40
Monmouth, UK ...........................
Behavioral health facility
15,244
11,357
—
—
15,244
11,357
26,601
1,343
—
2017
June 25, 2021
40
Montclair, NJ .............................
Acute care general hospital
7,900
99,640
577
—
8,477
99,640
108,117
27,388
—
1920-2000
April 1, 2014
40
Mount Pleasant, SC........................
Long term acute care
hospital
597
2,198
—
—
597
2,198
2,795
335
—
2012
August 30, 2019
40
New Braunfels, TX........................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,853
10,622
—
—
1,853
10,622
12,475
1,126
—
2011
February 29, 2012
40
New Orleans, LA..........................
Freestanding ER
2,850
6,125
—
—
2,850
6,125
8,975
1,263
—
2016
September 23, 2016
40
Newark, NJ ...............................
Acute care general hospital
32,957
24,553
—
—
32,957
24,553
57,510
2,657
—
1919, 1920-2003
May 2, 2016
40
Newburgh, IN.............................
Behavioral health facility
1,215
7,212
—
—
1,215
7,212
8,427
690
—
2010
October 19, 2021
40
Northland, MO............................
Long term acute care
hospital
834
17,182
—
—
834
17,182
18,016
5,978
—
2007
February 14, 2011
40
Norwalk, CA..............................
Acute care general hospital
2,811
5,940
—
—
2,811
5,940
8,751
649
—
1959, 1995
July 6, 2021
40
Norwalk, CA..............................
Acute care general hospital
7,946
30,465
7,104
—
7,946
37,569
45,515
3,158
—
1958-1978
July 6, 2021
40
Norwood, MA.............................
Acute care general hospital
6,373
—
—
—
6,373
—
6,373
—
—
N/A
June 27, 2018
46
Nottingham, UK...........................
Acute care general hospital
4,869
45,175
—
—
4,869
45,175
50,044
5,726
32,221
1983
January 9, 2020
40
Nottingham, UK...........................
Behavioral health facility
9,842
8,808
—
—
9,842
8,808
18,650
1,012
—
2000
June 25, 2021
40
Nottingham, UK...........................
Behavioral health facility
9,988
3,191
—
—
9,988
3,191
13,179
312
—
1980
June 25, 2021
40
Odessa, TX ...............................
Acute care general hospital
6,217
123,518
16,600
—
6,217
140,118
146,335
24,157
—
1973-2004
September 29, 2017
41
Ogden, UT................................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,759
16,414
—
—
1,759
16,414
18,173
4,435
—
2014
March 1, 2014
40
Oklahoma City, OK .......................
Behavioral health facility
3,641
3,047
—
—
3,641
3,047
6,688
492
—
2017
October 19, 2021
40
Olathe, KS................................
Behavioral health facility
6,882
56,381
11,584
—
6,882
67,965
74,847
4,934
—
2015
October 19, 2021
40
Olathe, KS................................
Acute care general hospital
3,485
14,484
—
—
3,485
14,484
17,969
1,756
—
2018
June 10, 2019
50
Orpington, UK ............................
Acute care general hospital
10,163
41,992
—
—
10,163
41,992
52,155
5,299
24,206
1987
January 9, 2020
40
Ottumwa, IA..............................
Acute care general hospital
2,377
48,697
—
—
2,377
48,697
51,074
9,057
—
1950
December 17, 2019
30
Oulu, Finland .............................
Acute care general hospital
2,976
42,125
—
—
2,976
42,125
45,101
3,162
—
2017
March 11, 2022
40
Overland Park, KS ........................
Acute care general hospital
2,974
14,405
—
—
2,974
14,405
17,379
1,755
—
2017
June 10, 2019
50
Overland Park, KS ........................
Acute care general hospital
3,191
14,263
—
—
3,191
14,263
17,454
1,825
—
2019
June 10, 2019
50
Overlook, TX .............................
Acute care general hospital
2,452
9,666
7
—
2,452
9,673
12,125
2,869
—
2012
February 1, 2013
40
Palestine, TX..............................
Acute care general hospital
1,848
95,257
—
—
1,848
95,257
97,105
12,482
—
1988
December 17, 2019
40
132

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Pasco, WA................................
Acute care general hospital
2,594
13,195
—
—
2,594
13,195
15,789
2,855
—
1920
August 31, 2018
30
Pearland, TX..............................
Freestanding ER
1,075
3,577
—
—
1,075
3,577
4,652
924
—
2014
September 8, 2014
40
Petersburg, VA ...........................
Rehabilitation hospital
1,302
9,121
—
—
1,302
9,121
10,423
3,762
—
2006
July 1, 2008
40
Phoenix, AZ ..............................
Behavioral health facility
2,396
7,276
2,985
—
2,396
10,261
12,657
5,014
—
1979
September 29, 2017
42
Phoenix, AZ ..............................
Acute care general hospital
12,695
51,834
4,499
—
12,695
56,333
69,028
14,842
—
1968-1976
September 29, 2017
43
Plano, TX.................................
Freestanding ER
4,077
1,416
—
—
4,077
1,416
5,493
584
—
2016
September 30, 2016
40
Poole, UK ................................
Acute care general hospital
2,286
37,734
—
—
2,286
37,734
40,020
5,620
12,821
1996
April 3, 2019
40
Poplar Bluff, MO .........................
Acute care general hospital
2,659
38,694
—
—
2,659
38,694
41,353
16,156
—
1980
April 22, 2008
40
Port Arthur, TX...........................
Acute care general hospital
11,432
76,746
6,877
—
11,432
83,623
95,055
23,087
—
2005
September 26, 2013
40
Port Huron, MI............................
Acute care general hospital
2,531
14,252
—
—
2,531
14,252
16,783
4,382
—
1953, 1973-1983
December 31, 2015
30
Post Falls, ID .............................
Rehabilitation hospital
417
12,175
1,905
—
767
13,730
14,497
3,785
—
2013
December 31, 2013
40
Preston, UK...............................
Behavioral health facility
8,593
31,287
—
—
8,593
31,287
39,880
2,487
—
1850, 2018, 2021
June 25, 2021
40
Princes Risborough, UK...................
Acute care general hospital
3,345
—
—
—
3,345
—
3,345
—
—
N/A
January 9, 2020
40
Raleigh, NC ..............................
Behavioral health facility
3,469
27,514
—
—
3,469
27,514
30,983
2,585
—
2018
October 19, 2021
40
Reading, UK..............................
Acute care general hospital
34,208
45,393
—
—
34,208
45,393
79,601
6,324
—
1990
August 16, 2019
40
Reading, UK..............................
Acute care general hospital
25,556
81,890
—
—
25,556
81,890
107,446
8,350
22,118
2012
December 18, 2020
40
Remscheid, Germany......................
Rehabilitation hospital
983
2,371
—
—
983
2,371
3,354
398
—
1951, 1983
August 28, 2018
40
Richmond, TX............................
Behavioral health facility
5,380
6,665
10,815
—
5,380
17,480
22,860
867
—
2014
October 19, 2021
40
Richmond, VA............................
Long term acute care
hospital
1,293
10,071
—
—
1,293
10,071
11,364
1,739
—
1989
August 30, 2019
40
Riverton, WY.............................
Acute care general hospital
1,163
29,647
—
—
1,163
29,647
30,810
4,594
—
1983
December 17, 2019
36
Roaring Springs, PA ......................
Acute care general hospital
1,446
9,549
—
—
1,446
9,549
10,995
2,027
—
1924
December 17, 2019
30
Rochdale, MA ............................
Long term acute care
hospital
654
3,368
—
—
654
3,368
4,022
527
—
1989
August 30, 2019
40
Rochdale, MA ............................
Acute care general hospital
67
344
—
—
67
344
411
54
—
1989
August 30, 2019
40
Rochdale, UK.............................
Acute care general hospital
3,517
40,065
—
—
3,517
40,065
43,582
5,054
21,903
1965
January 9, 2020
40
Roeland Park, KS .........................
Acute care general hospital
1,569
15,103
—
—
1,569
15,103
16,672
1,795
—
2018
June 10, 2019
50
Romford, UK.............................
Behavioral health facility
5,263
8,618
—
—
5,263
8,618
13,881
952
—
1980
June 25, 2021
40
Rosenberg, TX............................
Freestanding ER
1,233
4,505
—
—
1,233
4,505
5,738
1,014
—
2016
January 15, 2016
40
Rowley, UK ..............................
Acute care general hospital
2,859
17,993
—
—
2,859
17,993
20,852
2,627
—
1986
August 16, 2019
40
Royston, UK..............................
Behavioral health facility
6,620
19,710
—
—
6,620
19,710
26,330
2,172
—
1906, 1970
June 25, 2021
40
Salt Lake City, UT ........................
Acute care general hospital
2,913
—
—
—
2,913
—
2,913
—
—
N/A
September 29, 2017
41
San Antonio, TX..........................
Acute care general hospital
8,053
10,851
7,982
—
8,053
18,833
26,886
6,230
—
1978-2002
September 29, 2017
41
San Antonio, TX..........................
Freestanding ER
3,030
4,801
—
—
3,030
4,801
7,831
970
—
2016
December 9, 2016
40
San Antonio, TX..........................
Freestanding ER
351
3,952
—
—
351
3,952
4,303
1,061
—
2014
January 1, 2014
40
San Antonio, TX..........................
Acute care general hospital
2,248
5,880
—
—
2,248
5,880
8,128
1,789
—
2012
October 2, 2012
40
San Antonio, TX..........................
Freestanding ER
2,343
4,253
—
—
2,343
4,253
6,596
868
—
2016
October 27, 2016
40
San Bernardino, CA.......................
Acute care general hospital
2,209
37,498
—
—
2,209
37,498
39,707
5,464
—
1993
August 30, 2019
40
—
133

Initial Costs
Additions Subsequent
to Acquisition
Cost at December 31, 2024(1)
Accumulated
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
income
statements is
Location
Type of Property
Land
Buildings
Improve-
ments
Carrying
Costs
Land
Buildings
Total
Depreciation
Encum-
brances
Date of
Construction
Date Acquired
computed
(Years)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Santa Maria de Feira, PT.
Acute care general hospital
1,744
16,732
—
—
1,744
16,732
18,476
1,395
—
2015
October 21, 2021
40
Sharon, PA..............
Acute care general hospital
6,179
9,066
8,513
—
6,179
17,579
23,758
3,984
—
1950-1980
May 1, 2017
41
Shawnee, KS............
Acute care general hospital
3,076
14,945
—
—
3,076
14,945
18,021
2,070
—
2018
June 10, 2019
50
Sheffield, UK ...........
Acute care general hospital
6,502
43,862
—
—
6,502
43,862
50,364
5,564
32,006
2008
January 9, 2020
40
Sherman, TX............
Acute care general hospital
3,363
10,931
—
—
3,363
10,931
14,294
4,595
—
1913, 1960-
2010
October 31, 2014
40
Southampton, UK .......
Behavioral health facility
6,336
18,605
—
—
6,336
18,605
24,941
2,017
—
1820, 1985
June 25, 2021
40
Spartanburg, SC.........
Rehabilitation hospital
1,135
15,717
—
—
1,135
15,717
16,852
4,472
—
2013
August 1, 2013
40
Stirling, UK.............
Acute care general hospital
1,036
19,181
—
—
1,036
19,181
20,217
1,754
9,002
1992
July 6, 2021
40
Stockton, CA............
Rehabilitation hospital
2,757
50,681
—
—
2,757
50,681
53,438
2,112
—
2021
November 23, 2020
40
Surrey, UK..............
Behavioral health facility
14,793
8,975
—
—
14,793
8,975
23,768
632
—
1950, 2014
December 9, 2022
40
Swindon, UK............
Acute care general hospital
5,238
58,763
—
—
5,238
58,763
64,001
7,389
30,855
1984
January 9, 2020
40
Tadley, UK..............
Behavioral health facility
20,564
18,739
—
—
20,564
18,739
39,303
2,154
—
2020
June 25, 2021
40
Tempe, AZ..............
Acute care general hospital
6,050
10,986
5,239
—
6,050
16,225
22,275
3,325
—
1940
September 29, 2017
41
Texarkana, TX ..........
Acute care general hospital
14,562
—
—
—
14,562
—
14,562
—
—
N/A
September 29, 2017
-
The Woodlands, TX .....
Freestanding ER
1,949
4,524
—
—
1,949
4,524
6,473
990
—
2016
March 28, 2016
40
Toledo, OH .............
Rehabilitation hospital
1,118
17,740
—
—
1,118
17,740
18,858
3,881
—
2016
April 1, 2016
40
Tomball, TX ............
Long term acute care
hospital
1,299
20,545
—
—
1,299
20,545
21,844
8,268
—
2005
December 21, 2010
40
Torquay, UK............
Acute care general hospital
2,930
35,139
—
—
2,930
35,139
38,069
4,832
—
1981
August 16, 2019
40
Turku, Finland ..........
Acute care general hospital
1,133
54,582
—
—
1,133
54,582
55,715
3,946
—
2018
March 11, 2022
40
Usk, UK ................
Behavioral health facility
1,700
30,500
—
—
1,700
30,500
32,200
2,164
—
1770, 1850,
1980
June 25, 2021
40
Valencia, SP ............
Acute care general hospital
10,438
65,236
—
—
10,438
65,236
75,674
5,797
—
2017
December 2, 2021
40
Valencia, SP ............
Acute care general hospital
24,332
22,785
—
—
24,332
22,785
47,117
522
—
1960, 2024
May 6, 2022
40
Vancouver, WA .........
Behavioral health facility
9,313
12,505
—
—
9,313
12,505
21,818
803
—
2018
October 19, 2021
40
Viseu, Portugal..........
Acute care general hospital
2,377
27,091
—
—
2,377
27,091
29,468
3,862
—
2016
November 28, 2019
37
Warren, OH.............
Acute care general hospital
5,385
38,374
10,492
—
5,385
48,866
54,251
12,698
—
1982
May 1, 2017
41
Warren, OH.............
Rehabilitation hospital
2,417
15,857
1,737
—
2,417
17,594
20,011
3,983
—
1922-2000
May 1, 2017
46
Webster, TX ............
Long term acute care
hospital
663
33,751
—
—
663
33,751
34,414
11,742
—
2004
December 21, 2010
40
West Chester, OH .......
Behavioral health facility
3,670
61,338
—
—
3,670
61,338
65,008
5,364
—
2013
October 19, 2021
40
West Midlands, UK......
Behavioral health facility
1,890
7,042
—
—
1,890
7,042
8,932
342
—
2013
April 14, 2023
40
West Monroe, LA .......
Acute care general hospital
11,702
69,433
19,116
—
12,254
87,997
100,251
23,234
—
1962
September 26, 2013
40
Wichita, KS.............
Rehabilitation hospital
1,019
18,374
—
—
1,019
18,374
19,393
7,693
—
1992
April 4, 2008
40
Willenhall, UK..........
Behavioral health facility
7,166
15,987
—
—
7,166
15,987
23,153
1,513
—
2000
June 25, 2021
40
Winchester, UK .........
Acute care general hospital
6,377
10,103
—
—
6,377
10,103
16,480
1,303
10,248
1911
January 9, 2020
40
Windsor, UK............
Acute care general hospital
11,978
102,957
—
—
11,978
102,957
114,935
12,903
—
1955
January 9, 2020
40
Woking, UK ............
Behavioral health facility
7,117
4,601
—
—
7,117
4,601
11,718
493
—
1800, 2020
June 25, 2021
40
Worthing, UK...........
Acute care general hospital
6,602
29,637
—
—
6,602
29,637
36,239
3,736
17,192
1994
January 9, 2020
40
York, UK ...............
Behavioral health facility
3,645
6,629
—
—
3,645
6,629
10,274
325
—
2008
April 14, 2023
40
York, UK ...............
Behavioral health facility
21,270
70,559
—
—
21,270
70,559
91,829
6,523
—
1900, 1980
June 25, 2021
40
Youngstown, OH........
Acute care general hospital
3,555
3,469
488
—
3,555
3,957
7,512
2,724
—
1929-2003
May 1, 2017
41
$
1,605,243
$
8,087,849
$ 393,401
$
—
$ 1,606,722
$ 8,479,771
$ 10,086,493
$
1,239,897
$ 790,230
(1)
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $11.0 billion.
(2)
Date of construction is based off of best available information, but note that this facility has had multiple updates since initial construction.
134

The changes in total real estate assets (excluding construction in progress, intangible lease assets, investment in financing leases, and mortgage loans) are as follows for the
years ended (in thousands):
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2022
COST
Balance at beginning of period ......................................................................................... $
11,813,175
$ 12,300,524
$ 13,628,749
Acquisitions ..................................................................................................................
—
143,882
622,999
Transfers from construction in progress .......................................................................
79,385
72,791
47,431
Additions.......................................................................................................................
73,523
87,873
150,290
Dispositions...................................................................................................................
(1,492,320)
(874,519)
(1,471,529)
Impairments ..................................................................................................................
(276,572)
(67,671)
—
Other..............................................................................................................................
(110,698)(3)
150,295 (3)
(677,416)(3)
Balance at end of period.................................................................................................... $
10,086,493 (4)$ 11,813,175 (4)$ 12,300,524
The changes in accumulated depreciation are as follows for the years ended (in thousands):
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
Balance at beginning of period...................................................... $
1,227,619
$
1,008,340
$
950,369
Depreciation ..............................................................................
242,802
270,816
277,032
Depreciation on disposed property............................................
(220,435)
(73,765)
(185,519)
Other..........................................................................................
(10,089)
22,228
(33,542)
Balance at end of period................................................................ $
1,239,897 (5)
$
1,227,619
$
1,008,340
(3) Includes foreign currency fluctuations for all years.
(4) Excludes approximately $420 million and $400 million of construction and building improvements in progress reflected in buildings and improvements at December 31,
2024 and 2023, respectively. Includes $52.2 million of land and building cost reflected in real estate held for sale at December 31, 2024.
(5) Includes $18.2 million of accumulated depreciation reflected in real estate held for sale at December 31, 2024.
135

136
SCHEDULE IV — MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
December 31, 2024
Column A
Column B
Column C
Column D
Column E
Column F
Column
G(1)
Column H
Description
Interest
Rate
Final
Maturity
Date
Periodic Payment
Terms
Prior
Liens
Face
Amount of
Mortgages
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages
Principal
Amount of
Loans
Subject to
Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Long-term first mortgage
loan:
Colombia(2).........................
11.61%
2035
(4)
(6) $
129,968
$ 111,985
(8)
Vibra....................................
11.50%
2026
(5)
(6)
7,986
7,927
(8)
Prospect(3)...........................
9.00%
2028
(4)
(6)
155,223
—
(8)
$
293,177
$ 119,912
(7)
(1)
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $293.2 million.
(2)
Mortgage loans covering three properties.
(3)
Mortgage loans covering four properties.
(4)
Payable in monthly installments of interest plus principal payable in full at maturity.
(5)
Payable in monthly installments of principal and interest.
(6)
There were no prior liens on loans as of December 31, 2024.
(7)
Includes reserves/writedowns of approximately $18 million for Colombia and $155 million for Prospect in 2024. The Vibra loan
includes a credit loss reserve of approximately $0.1 million.
(8)
Mortgage loans were not delinquent with respect to principal or interest, except for interest payments on the Colombia loan.
Changes in mortgage loans (excluding allowance for credit loss) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 are
summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year................................. $
310,101
$
364,420
$
213,320
Additions during year:
New mortgage loans and additional advances
on existing loans.............................................
100,824
155,223
177,924
Exchange rate fluctuations ................................
(17,748)
31,530
(15,824)
393,177
551,173
375,420
Deductions during year:
Collection of principal.......................................
(100,000)
(241,072) (9)
(11,000)
Other..................................................................
(173,265) (7)
—
—
(273,265)
(241,072)
(11,000)
Balance at end of year ........................................... $
119,912
$
310,101
$
364,420
(9)
Includes a $151 million mortgage loan satisfied in exchange for non-controlling ownership interest in PHP Holdings as part of
the Prospect Transaction in the second quarter of 2023 as more fully described in Note 3 to Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

OFFICERS 
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. 
Chairman, President and  
Chief Executive Officer 
R. Steven Hamner 
Executive Vice President  
and Chief Financial Officer 
J. Kevin Hanna 
Senior Vice President,  
Controller and Chief  
Accounting Officer 
Rosa H. Hooper 
Senior Vice President 
of Operations and Secretary
Charles R. Lambert 
Senior Vice President  
of Finance and Treasurer
Larry H. Portal 
Senior Vice President,  
Senior Advisor to the CEO 
R. Lucas Savage 
Vice President,  
Head of Global Acquisitions 
CORPORATE & SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
DIRECTORS 
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. 
Chairman, President and  
Chief Executive Officer 
G. Steven Dawson 
Private Investor 
R. Steven Hamner 
Executive Vice President and  
Chief Financial Officer 
Caterina A. Mozingo, CPA, PFS 
Shareholder, Taxation at Aldridge,  
Borden & Company, PC 
Emily W. Murphy 
Former Administrator,  
U.S. General Services Administration 
Elizabeth N. Pitman, JD, CHPC 
Partner at Holland & Knight, LLP 
D. Paul Sparks, Jr.  
Retired Senior Vice President,  
Energen Corporation 
Michael G. Stewart 
Private Investor 
C. Reynolds Thompson, III 
Chief Executive Officer of  
the Propst Companies
LEGAL COUNSEL 
Baker, Donelson, Bearman,  
Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC  
Birmingham, AL 
Goodwin Procter, LLP 
New York, NY 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Birmingham, AL
ANNUAL MEETING 
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Medical 
Properties Trust, Inc. is scheduled for May 29, 2025,  
10:30 a.m. CDT at the UAB Collat School of Business, 
710 13th St. S., Birmingham, AL 35233. 
CERTIFICATIONS 
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer 
and Chief Financial Officer have filed their certifications 
required by the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(SEC) regarding the quality of the company’s public 
disclosure (these are included in the 2024 Annual 
Report filed with the SEC). Further, the company’s Chief 
Executive Officer has certified to the NYSE that he is 
not aware of any violation by Medical Properties Trust, 
Inc., of NYSE corporate governance listing standards,  
as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE  
listing standards.
TRANSFER AGENT  
AND REGISTRAR
Equiniti Trust Company, LLC
Operations Center
55 Challenger Road, Floor 2
Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660
Toll Free: 1-800-937-5449
Email: helpAST@equiniti.com
Website: https://equiniti.com/us/ast-
access/individuals/
CORPORATE OFFICE
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. 
1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501 
Birmingham, AL 35242 
Main: 205.969.3755 
Fax: 205.969.3756 
www.medicalpropertiestrust.com 
The MPT Annual Report for the year ended 
December 31, 2024, has been filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission and may 
be obtained without charge by any shareholder 
(including beneficial owners) upon written 
request to Investor Relations, Medical Properties 
Trust, Inc. 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, 
Birmingham, AL 35242.

1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501
Birmingham, AL 35242
Medicalpropertiestrust.com