Quarterlytics / Aerospace & Defense / Meggitt

Meggitt

mggt · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker mggt
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2021 Annual Report · Meggitt
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report and Accounts 2021
ENABLING THE 
EXTRAORDINARY
TO FLY   TO POWER   TO LIVE

Performance
Contents
Revenue
£1,489m
2020: £1,684m
Net debt2
£780m
2020: £773m
Underlying basic  
earnings per share4
15.4p
2020: 16.5p
Net debt: EBITDA6
1.9×
2020: 2.2x
Underlying operating profit1
£177m
2020: £191m
Free cash flow3
£46m
2020: £32m
Liquidity  
headroom5
£573m
2020: £908m
Statutory profit before tax
£31m
2020: loss of £334m
> Supported our stakeholders 
through another challenging 
year of COVID-19 and supply 
chain disruption
> Delivered good cash 
performance with free cash 
flow of £46m
> Global employee engagement 
up 2% versus 2020 levels and 
4% above high performing 
benchmark
> Commissioned our new 
manufacturing and engineering 
COE and global headquarters 
at Ansty Park, UK
> Delivered civil aftermarket 
organic revenue growth of 
7% for full year; up 51% in the 
second half (vs. H2 2020)
> Committed to setting targets 
under SBTi framework
> Added 11 SMARTSupport™ 
aftermarket contracts
Financial summary
Highlights
Introduction
Our vision
02
At a glance
04
Chairman’s statement
06
Strategic Report
Chief Executive’s review
09
Business model
16
Market trends
20
Our strategy
24
Key performance indicators
26
Divisional reviews
34
Chief Financial Officer’s review
42
Risk management
48
Principal risks & uncertainties
50
Taskforce on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures
58
Corporate Responsibility
64
Section 172 statement
89
Stakeholder engagement
90
Directors’ Report
Chairman’s introduction to Governance
98
Board of Directors
100
Corporate Governance
104
Audit Committee report
114
Nominations Committee report
122
Directors’ remuneration report
126
Other statutory information
156
Financial Statements
Group Financial Statements
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC
160
Consolidated income statement
171
Consolidated statement  
of comprehensive income
172
Consolidated balance sheet
173
Consolidated statement of  
changes in equity
174
Consolidated cash flow statement
175
Notes to the consolidated  
financial statements
176
Company Financial Statements
Company balance sheet
232
Company statement of changes  
in equity
233
Notes to the financial statements  
of the Company
234
Other Information
Five-year record
243
Investor information
244
Glossary
246
1	 Underlying operating profit is reconciled to operating profit 
in note 9 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on 
page 198.
2	 Please see note 43 to the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements on page 229.
3	 Free cash flow is reconciled to cash from operating activities 
in note 42 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements 
on page 228.
4	 Underlying earnings per share is reconciled to basic earnings 
per share in note 14 to the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements on page 201.
5	 Liquidity headroom is the difference between the 
Group’s committed credit facilities and its net borrowings 
(excluding lease liabilities). Please see note 1 to the Group’s 
consolidated financial statements on page 176.
6	 As calculated in accordance with covenants in the Group’s 
committed credit facilities as described on page 176.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021

We are Meggitt
We are innovators.
Customers worldwide rely on our  
advanced technologies, products and 
services in aerospace, defence and  
selected energy markets to help make  
the world a more efficient, sustainable 
and safe environment.
Enabling a more 
sustainable future
We work in amazing industries that underpin the 
prosperity and wellbeing of our planet. As the world 
looks to a net zero future, our technology and products 
play a key role in enabling environmentally sustainable 
flight and low-carbon power generation, enhancing  
lives and making the world more secure. 
 Find out how we are creating a more sustainable future 
in our Corporate Responsibility section on page 64
ENABLING THE 
EXTRAORDINARY
TO FLY   TO POWER   TO LIVE
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
01
Introduction

Driven by our purpose,  
vision and values
We are Meggitt
Introduction
Our purpose
At Meggitt we work closely with our customers to design and manufacture 
systems and products for the aerospace, defence and selected energy markets to 
deliver sustainable solutions for the most challenging environments by focusing on 
engineering and operational excellence.
Our vision
ENABLING THE EXTRAORDINARY
We support each other working in  
highly skilled passionate teams and 
recognise outstanding contributions, 
building great relationships with all  
our stakeholders. 
We do the right thing, in the  
right way wherever we operate.  
All our stakeholders can count on  
us to act with integrity, honesty  
and respect, with the highest  
standards of ethical behaviour.
We’re good at what we do and  
that’s why customers come back  
to us. We deliver the most ambitious 
technologies, products and services 
safely, efficiently and cost-effectively 
to our customers.
Our values
Our values reflect how we should strive together and  
the behaviours that are integral to our drive for success. 
EXCELLENCE
INTEGRITY
TEAMWORK
Expertise relied upon by customers 
to enable safe, cost-effective and 
environmentally responsible flight.
Products and services that  
enable customers to operate  
critical infrastructure reliably  
and without disruption.
Innovative technologies  
which enhance lives and make  
the world more secure.
To
LIVE
To
POWER
To
FLY
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
02

Guided by our strategy 
and business model
Our strategy and business model 
Our sustainability pillars
Delivering for our stakeholders
Our strategy
Our strategy supports our vision to enable the 
extraordinary and to deliver technologically differentiated 
systems and products with high certification requirements 
in aerospace, defence and selected energy markets.
  Read more on page 08
Our business model
Our diversified business model is core to our strategy.  
The resilience this brings means we can deliver  
value to all our stakeholders.
  Read more on page 16
Technology
To support the evolving needs of our 
global customers we will continue to 
invest in innovative new technologies 
to enable sustainable aviation.
  Read more on page 83
Planet
Our goal is to contribute to a cleaner 
future by continuously improving and 
adapting our operational systems to 
promote best practices, efficiencies 
and improvements.
  Read more on page 78
People
We are committed to creating a 
rewarding, safe and productive working 
culture for all Meggitt colleagues and 
supporting our local communities 
around the world.
  Read more on page 72
Our customers 
We strive to deliver the most  
sustainable services and products  
to our customers worldwide.
  Read more on page 18
Our shareholders 
We create value for shareholders 
through earnings generation and 
dividend payments.
  Read more on page 17
Our people 
Our success depends on the skills  
and expertise of our people.
  Read more on page 72
Our communities 
We understand our role in  
society and contribute to the  
communities in which we operate.
  Read more on page 75
Our suppliers
We have longstanding and  
beneficial relationships with  
our partners and suppliers. 
  Read more on page 17
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
03
Introduction

Introduction
At a glance
We deliver technologically differentiated systems and  
products, with high certification requirements, across the 
civil aerospace, defence and selected energy markets.
Aerospace 
Unique technologies 
for aerospace 
Civil aerospace accounts for 46% of 
Group revenue, with products and  
sub-systems installed on almost every jet 
airliner, regional aircraft and business jet 
in service today.
Group revenue  
by end market
Energy and other 
Keeping the lights on 
We supply unique technology to enable 
clean and efficient production and use  
of natural gas and support nuclear, 
hydro-electric and novel clean-energy 
power generation. 
Defence 
Protecting defence  
forces worldwide 
Defence represents 42% of Group 
revenue. We have equipment on an 
installed base of around 22,000 fixed 
wing and rotary aircraft and a significant 
number of ground vehicles. 
46%
Civil Aerospace
42%
Defence
12%
Energy and other
Our products are manufactured in our globally located facilities.
UK
2,327 
8 
Europe
940 
4 
North America
4,644 
18 
Rest of World
1,359 
6 
9,270
Total Group employees
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
04

We work in close collaboration with our customers to  
develop pioneering products, and go to market through 
four customer-aligned business divisions. 
Innovation is at the heart of what we do,  
underpinning the safety, reliability,  
and environmental performance  
of our products.
Optical sensing offers significant advantages over piezoelectric 
sensing technologies. For combustion dynamics monitoring, 
it enables more accurate measurement over a larger range of 
frequencies and allows gas turbines to operate more efficiently 
with lower emissions. Smaller in size and able to operate at a 
higher temperature, optical sensors can be positioned closer 
to the measurement point without signal degradation caused 
by electromagnetic perturbations or vibrations, making them 
suitable for hazardous environments.
Airframe Systems 
Market-leading industry 
provider of braking systems 
for commercial, business 
and defence aircraft, fire 
protection and safety systems, 
power and motion, fuel 
systems, avionics and sensors 
and advanced polymer 
seals for around 51,000 
in-service civil and 22,000 
defence aircraft. 
  Read more on page 34
Engine Systems
Market-leading position in 
advanced engine composites, 
thermal and safety systems 
with a broad range of 
technologies including 
vibration monitoring and 
engine health management 
systems. This division 
also provides aerospace 
engine flow control and 
sensing solutions.  
  Read more on page 36
Energy & Equipment 
Specialises in energy and 
defence equipment ranging 
from electronics cooling to 
ammunition handling systems 
and heat transfer equipment 
for offshore oil and gas 
facilities and renewable 
energy applications.
  Read more on page 38
Services & Support 
Provides a full-service 
aftermarket offering including 
spares distribution and 
maintenance, repair and 
overhaul (MRO) to our 
commercial, business jet 
and defence customers 
throughout the lifecycle 
of our products.
  Read more on page 40
50%
of revenue
14%
of revenue
18%
of revenue
18%
of revenue
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
05
Introduction

Introduction
Chairman’s statement
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank 
all employees for their resilience, dedication 
and hard work in delivering the year. 
Introduction
Having successfully navigated the 
unprecedented reduction in global flight 
activity in 2020 and the associated impact 
on the civil aerospace sector and the 
Group, 2021 has proved to be another 
highly eventful year in the long and proud 
history of Meggitt. 
And, as in previous years, the Board’s 
number one priority has been ensuring 
the safety and wellbeing of our people 
across the world as they continue to 
deliver for our customers. While the 
recovery has at times allowed for more 
normal working patterns to resume, our 
people and our sites have remained agile 
and adapted to changing circumstances 
throughout the year. 
While we have been encouraged by 
the impact of the vaccine rollout and 
gradual recovery in civil aerospace during 
the year, it is clear that activity levels 
and consumer sentiment remain highly 
sensitive to regional outbreaks and, as 
we saw during 2021, the emergence of 
new variants. We remain confident that 
recovery will continue during 2022 albeit 
its trajectory is likely to remain uneven. 
The ongoing impact of global supply 
chain disruption across many sectors as 
economies have recovered and demand 
has increased is well documented, 
posing an additional challenge during 
the year. I am extremely grateful to all our 
employees for once again demonstrating 
outstanding dedication and resilience 
across our global sites which has been a 
critical factor in enabling us to mitigate 
these headwinds. 
Alongside managing the recovery, 
we have continued to invest in the 
business across a number of areas: 
through our ongoing commitment to 
innovation and new technologies, we 
continue to support our customers in 
the development of more sustainable 
solutions and applications across the 
aerospace, defence and energy end 
markets; under our People, Planet and 
Technology framework, we are making 
our ways of working and facilities 
more sustainable; and finally, we have 
continued to invest in our operational 
capability through a number of projects 
and initiatives, most notably the transition 
to Ansty Park, our state-of-the-art facility 
in the UK. 
This investment will help ensure that our 
people, technology and global footprint 
will continue to thrive as the recovery 
continues in 2022 and beyond. 
2021 Performance
The Group has delivered the year against 
a backdrop of continuing challenging 
market conditions in civil aerospace, 
where activity levels remain below 
2019 levels despite recovering steadily 
during the year. Our operations and 
procurement teams have also worked 
hard to mitigate the impact of disruption 
in the supply chain at our sites as global 
demand has increased. 
The benefit of our diverse end-market 
exposure and breadth of our civil 
aerospace business can be seen in our 
results, with civil aftermarket revenue 
up on the prior year, with a strong 
performance from business jets. Our 
energy business has also performed well.
As in 2020, where possible, we have 
continued to safeguard future growth 
by protecting investment in new 
technologies, completing key projects 
such as Ansty Park and expanding 
capacity to support our brakes business 
as the recovery continues. Ansty Park and 
the associated consolidation of five sites 
in the UK, provides a modern, advanced 
and sustainable facility fostering 
enhanced interaction between a number 
of product groups, as well as a number of 
efficiency gains.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
06

Maintaining a robust balance sheet and 
managing cash flow remained key focus 
areas for the Board and I am pleased 
that our net debt levels were held in line 
with the prior year. In accordance with 
the terms of the proposed transaction 
with Parker-Hannifin, the Board did not 
reinstate the payment of dividends during 
the year. 
Proposed acquisition by 
Parker-Hannifin
Meggitt is one of the world’s leading 
aerospace, defence and selected energy 
market businesses and over the last four 
years, we have successfully delivered a 
strategy that has fundamentally improved 
our competitive position and standing 
with customers, transitioning the business 
through a programme of non-core 
disposals, targeted investments and 
building a High Performance Culture. 
And the benefits of our independent 
strategy were clear to see prior to 
COVID-19, with the Group recording 
seven consecutive quarters of revenue 
growth, achieving record operating 
profit and strong cash generation in 
2019, and creating significant value 
for shareholders. With the onset of 
COVID-19 we took quick and decisive 
action in the face of unprecedented 
challenges, positioning the business to 
remain competitive in that environment 
and well positioned for the recovery. 
As a result, the Group remains strongly 
positioned, with a compelling strategy 
which the Board believes can deliver 
attractive value for shareholders over the 
long term as our key markets, particularly 
commercial aerospace, recover. At the 
same time, however, there remains 
significant uncertainty as to the precise 
timing and speed of that recovery.
In that context, the Board decided that 
the all-cash offer by Parker-Hannifin 
would substantially accelerate and de-risk 
the delivery of that value. In reaching this 
decision, the Board carefully considered 
the commitments offered by Parker-
Hannifin to safeguard the interests of 
the Group’s wider stakeholders, the 
alignment of respective business models, 
cultures and the shared commitment to 
invest in technology and sustainability.
Accordingly, following careful 
consideration of both the financial 
terms and Parker-Hannifin’s plans for 
the Group under their ownership, the 
Board recommended unanimously 
the proposed acquisition which was 
subsequently approved by shareholders 
in September.
Board interaction/ 
developments
The Board has continued to operate 
effectively through virtual and, where 
possible, the resumption of face-to-
face meetings with UK-based Directors 
with a number of additional meetings 
being held over and above those that 
were scheduled. 
With no changes to the membership of 
the Board in 2021, as in 2020, this has 
provided important stability and continuity 
for the Group, particularly in light of the 
corporate activity in the summer months 
culminating in the recommended offer in 
August by Parker-Hannifin. 
In addition to managing the Parker-
Hannifin transaction, the Board has 
continued to focus on business as usual 
activities with the main focus areas 
being managing the Group through the 
recovery, maintaining a robust balance 
sheet and executing our strategy 
including investment in technologies to 
make aviation and energy generation 
more sustainable.
I am also pleased to report that 
Nancy Gioia, Chair of the Corporate 
Responsibility Committee and Non-
Executive Director responsible for 
employee engagement, was able to 
continue her employee engagement 
schedule alongside other Board Directors 
during 2021.
In light of continued restrictions on travel 
and free movement at the start of the 
year, Executive Directors increased their 
level of interaction using virtual meetings 
with every site and involving all levels of 
the business. 
As in previous years, I held virtual 
meetings with shareholders at various 
points during 2021 discussing a range 
of topics.
People
We have no higher priority than 
ensuring a safe and secure working 
environment for all employees. As 
well as the continued provision of 
additional measures at each site to 
protect our people and reduce the risk 
of infection, I am also pleased to report 
an improvement in our overall safety 
performance with our Total Recordable 
Incident Rate for the year reaching its 
lowest level to date at 0.63 (2020: 0.71).
The Board is pleased that our work 
on culture could continue during the 
year, not only through monthly culture 
briefings run for all of our leaders, but 
also through our second annual Inclusion 
Week in September, helping to connect 
more of our employees across Meggitt 
to our eight Employee Resource Groups, 
membership of which has doubled to 
reach over a thousand employees. 
Navigating what has proved to be 
another challenging year has required 
strong leadership across the Group, 
particularly our line managers and 
operational leaders. On behalf of the 
Board, I would like to thank all employees 
for their resilience, dedication and 
hard work. 
In particular, I’d like to thank again all 
those that have continued to work at 
our sites to deliver for our customers 
throughout the year.
Looking ahead
Having put in place strong foundations 
through the execution of our strategy 
over the last four years, with the recovery 
in civil aerospace underway and the 
ongoing commitments made by Parker-
Hannifin, the Board is optimistic about 
the opportunities that lie ahead for 
the Group and for all our stakeholders 
including employees, customers, 
shareholders and pension plan members. 
Sir Nigel Rudd
Chairman
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
07
Introduction

Strategic Report
STRATEGIC 
REPORT
Chief Executive’s review
09
Strategy in action: Strategic portfolio
14
Business model
16
Strategy in action: Customers
18
Market trends
20
Our strategy
24
Key performance indicators
26
Strategy in action: Competitiveness
30
Strategy in action: Culture
32
Divisional reviews
34
Chief Financial Officer’s review
42
Risk management
48
Principal risks & uncertainties
50
Taskforce on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures
58
Corporate Responsibility
64
Section 172 statement
89
Stakeholder engagement
90
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
08

Chief Executive’s review
Our priority during the year has 
continued to be the safety of our teams 
while delivering for our customers as 
the recovery continues.
Introduction
Our focus in 2021 and as we move 
through 2022, continues to be ensuring 
the safety and wellbeing of our people, 
protecting our sites, serving our 
customers and executing our strategy.
As in 2020, against the backdrop of 
what continued to be challenging 
market conditions as the recovery 
in civil aerospace got underway, our 
employees have once again remained 
focused on delivering for our customers 
and executing our strategy, and I want 
to thank all of them for their continued 
resilience and dedication throughout  
the period. 
While the recovery in civil aerospace is 
encouraging, driven by the continued 
rollout of vaccines and more of the 
global fleet gradually returning to 
service, as we have seen throughout the 
year, its trajectory has been non-linear 
and remains highly sensitive to the 
reintroduction of local restrictions and 
border controls. 
The extent of the recovery has also 
varied greatly, with domestic, cargo 
and business jets leading the way, with 
international activity levels held back 
by the closure of borders. With strong 
content across all parts of the civil fleet 
including large, regional and business 
jets, the diverse nature of our civil 
aerospace business allows us to benefit 
from those parts of the market recovering 
more quickly. 
Full year performance
Having moved fast to reposition the 
business in 2020, a major priority for  
the Group and our global teams in 2021  
has been to ensure our sites continued  
to deliver for our customers as civil 
activity levels increased, while navigating 
the additional challenge caused by  
disruption in the global supply chain as 
global demand across a number  
of sectors returned. 
The work we have done over the last 
four years to strengthen the Group 
through our investments in differentiated 
technology and operations combined 
with our focus on High Performance 
Culture, have been pivotal in helping 
the Group mitigate the impact of these 
additional external pressures.
During the year, we have seen 
encouraging signs of the recovery with 
civil aftermarket organic revenue growth 
of 7% including a strong performance 
from brakes where revenue grew 22%, 
reflecting increased utilisation in the 
narrow body, regional aircraft and 
business jet fleets. We also saw strong 
civil aftermarket organic order intake 
in the final quarter of the year providing 
us with momentum as we entered 2022. 
I am also pleased that we delivered 
another year of positive free cash flow, 
maintaining a robust balance sheet 
while continuing to invest in our people, 
operations and technology in line with 
our strategy. 
During the year, we secured a number 
of significant customer wins across our 
end markets and continued to build the 
pipeline of new opportunities to underpin 
future growth, leveraging our leading 
market positions and strong technology.
As we look ahead to the remainder of 
2022 and beyond, and notwithstanding 
that the trajectory of the recovery 
in civil aerospace is likely to remain 
uneven in the short term, the long-term 
fundamentals of civil aerospace and  
our defence and energy end markets 
remain strong. 
As a result of the successful execution 
of our strategy and the work we have 
done to position the Group, I am 
positive about the future for the Group 
and the opportunities that lie ahead for 
employees and all our other stakeholders. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
09
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Chief Executive’s review
continued
Enabling our sustainable future
At Meggitt, we work in partnership 
with all of our stakeholders to enable a 
sustainable future and have adopted a 
framework to illustrate our approach and 
ambition, focusing on three core pillars: 
People, Planet and Technology. The 
framework is aligned to our core business 
strategy and also looks through the wider 
ESG lens including the United Nations 
Sustainability Development Goals and 
our corporate responsibility objectives.
•	 People – through our core values of 
Teamwork, Integrity and Excellence 
and our High Performance Culture 
we are committed to creating a 
rewarding, safe and productive working 
environment for our employees and 
supporting our local communities. 
	 During 2021, aligned with our purpose 
of connecting our employees with the 
communities we serve, we launched 
our Community Heroes initiative, a 
global volunteering programme giving 
employees paid time off to volunteer 
in their communities. We continued 
the rollout of our leadership training 
programmes, Spitfire and LeadX, to 
develop our operational and high 
potential leaders. We also significantly 
expanded the number of ambassadors 
supporting our eight Employee 
Resource Groups and continued our 
Extraordinary People recognition 
scheme, recognising people and 
teams across a number of categories: 
Operational Excellence, Innovation, 
Teamwork, Safety, Sustainability, 
Customer Service and Community.
•	 Planet – our goal is to contribute 
to a cleaner future by continuously 
improving and adapting our 
operational systems across our sites to 
promote efficiencies and improvements 
by harnessing green energy, driving 
operational excellence and reducing 
harmful emissions, where we have set a 
target to reduce net carbon emissions 
by 50% by 2025 relative to revenue. 
	 In 2021, we joined the United Nations 
Race to Zero campaign committing to 
reduce absolute value chain emissions 
in line with a trajectory compatible with 
a 1.5 degree warming scenario, and 
reaching Net Zero before 2050. We 
have increased our dedicated resources 
with the appointment of a Group 
Director of Sustainability, a key role to 
review and oversee our environmental 
operational performance across 
the Group. Earlier in the year, we 
completed our transition in the UK to 
source 100% of electricity from green 
sources and are proud that Ansty Park 
was recognised as being in the top 
25% of international new construction 
projects for sustainability. Additionally, 
we adopted the use of the Science 
Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to allow 
us to accurately measure emissions in 
line with the Paris Agreement goals.
•	 Technology – to support the evolving 
needs of our global customers and 
building on our rich heritage, we 
continue to invest in innovative new 
technologies to support and enable 
sustainable aviation, such as advanced 
thermal systems, optical sensing 
and engine composites, that allow 
engines to become more efficient 
and technologies that improve the 
environmental performance of aircraft, 
including electrical power and storage 
solutions and green fire protection. 
We are also actively involved in the 
industry’s exploration of alternative 
fuels including sustainable aviation 
fuels and hydrogen.
Strategy update
Portfolio
We focus investment in attractive markets 
where we have, or can develop, a leading 
position. This encompasses organic 
investment in differentiated products and 
manufacturing technologies; targeted, 
value-enhancing acquisitions; and 
selective non-core disposals resulting in 
over 80% of Group revenue derived from 
attractive markets where we have strong 
market positions. With over 70% of Group 
revenue generated from sole-source, 
life-of-programme positions underpinned 
by Meggitt-owned intellectual property, 
the continued strengthening of our 
technology portfolio remains a critical 
priority of the Group.
In the year we successfully delivered 
our technology programme milestones, 
maintained our investment in 
differentiated technology and continued 
our commitment to invest two-thirds of 
our innovation budget on technologies to 
deliver the next generation of sustainable 
aircraft. A summary of key highlights and 
progress in 2021 are as follows:
•	 Next generation engines – 
good progress has been made in 
developing the new heat exchanger 
technologies that will be needed to 
meet the increased cooling of the next 
generation of aircraft engines. This 
has included expanding our additive-
manufacturing capabilities and working 
with major engine companies and 
industry research organisations to 
develop and test solutions for new civil 
and military engine designs. 
•	 Green fire suppression – 
work continues with aircraft OEMs 
to qualify VERDAGENT®, Meggitt’s 
proprietary “green” fire suppressant 
agent to replace ozone depleting 
Halon 1301. For cargo applications, 
preparation is under way for an Airbus 
flight test in 2022 and we were also 
selected by Boeing to support their 
2021 Eco Demonstrator programme 
with an Alaskan Airlines sponsored 737-
9 aircraft equipped with our CF3I engine 
fire suppressant delivery system. We 
have also progressed the Minimum 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
10

Key highlights
55
SMARTSupport™ contracts with 
an aggregate value of £223m
76%
Global engagement 2% above 
2020 levels and 4% above high 
performance benchmark
Performance Standard (MPS) testing 
for engine applications of CF3I with 
Boeing at the FAA Technical Centre 
with cold testing to follow in 2022.
•	 Energy – in our Heatric business, we 
continued to make good progress on 
the application of its market-leading 
PCHE technology in the field of super 
critical CO2 power cycles, including 
the supply of a recuperator for an EU 
sponsored collaboration demonstrator 
project launched in 2021. We are 
working with turbine OEMs to develop 
hydrogen-capable valves and an 
optical sensing solution for combustion 
pressure monitoring, allowing better 
control of emissions and efficiency. 
A customer engine demonstration 
is under way and industrialisation is 
continuing in 2022.
•	 Optical sensing – we have delivered 
our first high-temperature engine- 
mounted optical pressure sensing 
systems to support engine testing 
with major aerospace customers. Our 
dynamic pressure sensing system 
continues its demonstration testing 
in an energy gas turbine environment 
and we are planning an evaluation 
test of this technology in a hydrogen 
combustion environment in 2022. 
Working with major aerospace 
customers we have also made good 
progress in evaluating the use of 
our optical bleed air leak detection 
technology as an upgrade on high-
rate programmes.
•	 Engine data management – 
we successfully developed a prototype 
of a high-temperature engine-mounted 
Data Acquisition and Transmission Unit 
(DATU), which supports an innovative 
modular distributed health monitoring 
solution for engine and airframe OEMs, 
enabling them to access end-to-end 
data for next generation engines in 
real time. This prototype was delivered 
to its miniaturised specification and 
has elicited a positive response 
from customers.
•	 Electric flight – with our major 
urban air mobility customer, we 
successfully delivered and tested our 
technology meeting all expectations 
for performance, stability and control. 
On our second generation of lithium 
ion batteries, we have focused on 
industrialisation and continue to co-
define technology acceptance criteria 
with certification authorities. The 
3D-printed concept demonstrator was 
shown at the NBAA exhibition. We 
have also launched the development of 
a HVDC energy buffer to complement 
the primary electrical power source for 
a customer’s greener future platform 
architecture. We have matured our 
technology for inertial sensing and 
have received an award to develop a 
tactical grade inertial measurement 
unit for an eVTOL primary flight control 
by a major airframe OEM.
We have also continued to leverage 
advanced manufacturing technology 
and processes across our sites: 
•	 Additive manufacturing (AM) – 
we have continued to increase the 
use of additively manufactured tooling 
to support production operations 
across the Group and, through our 
partnership with HiETA Technologies, 
we have proven our capability to 
provide AM heat exchangers, in less 
than four weeks, to OEM customers for 
ground-based tests. The work on the 
ATI sponsored programme LAMDA has 
launched, which sees our participation 
in the development and evaluation of 
a large format AM machine with our 
partner Renishaw in Ansty Park.
•	 Digital manufacturing – 
we have continued to deploy digital 
manufacturing technologies into 
production cells through the use of 
digital work instructions, integration of 
machining and inspection data systems 
and the use of RFID real-time location 
and augmented reality systems. The 
technology has proven valuable both in 
improving productivity and supporting 
collaboration across our global teams 
when, due to the pandemic, travel  
was difficult.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
11
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Chief Executive’s review
continued
Customers
Our success in moving from a 
transactional approach to building long- 
term relationships through our customer- 
aligned divisions, extends our visibility of 
near-term customer requirements and has 
enabled us to better support the demand 
for original equipment and spare parts 
and maintenance, repair and overhaul 
(MRO) in the aftermarket.
We have continued to invest in capability 
and capacity across our three global 
Services & Support centres of excellence. 
In our APAC hub in Singapore, we have 
doubled our footprint and added over 
100 new part numbers to our portfolio and 
at our Americas hub in Miami, we have 
consolidated a number of sites into the 
facility and increased our footprint adding 
significant capability across our product 
portfolio. These investments, together with 
our world-class facility at Ansty Park, provide 
us with multi-product group MRO and 
spares capability across all three regions.
During the year, we secured a number of 
customer contracts across our three core 
end markets of civil aerospace, defence 
and energy, including:
•	 In civil aerospace, a $40m contract to 
supply Wireless Emergency Lighting 
Systems (WELS) to Boeing for the 787 
and a £98m life of programme contract 
for a civil airframe OEM for the supply 
of rate gyrometer accelerometer units.
•	 In defence, a $22m contract for the 
supply and retrofit of RF cables for the 
F-22 aircraft.
•	 In energy, a significant order with a major 
US turbines manufacturer for the sole 
source supply of next generation valves 
and a multi-million pound contract with 
Siemens Energy to supply PCHEs for the 
Mero 3 Floating Production Storage and 
Offloading vessel.
A number of facilities were recognised 
for their excellence by our customers in 
2021: our facility in Rockmart, US, which 
manufactures self-sealing, crashworthy 
fuel cells, received “Supplier of the 
Year” from Bell, Boeing Defence and a 
multi-service US military panel for the 
development and production of new 
ballistic-tolerant, crashworthy fuel cells for 
the Osprey aircraft; our San Diego site, 
which supplies high performance and 
high-temperature advanced composites, 
was presented with a Performance 
Excellence Award for Product Quality 
and On-Time Delivery; and our Fribourg 
facility was nominated for an innovation 
award for their novel optical sensing 
technology, recognised as a breakthrough 
in combustion monitoring for aircraft 
engines and land-based gas turbines, 
used in power generation.
In Services & Support, we saw continued 
momentum with SMARTSupport™, 
our long-term contract offering for 
aftermarket customers, securing an 
additional 11 agreements, taking the total 
number to 55 with an aggregate value 
of £223m, with a number of additional 
opportunities in the pipeline. These long-
term contracts underpin our aftermarket 
and market share growth in the future 
and provide better insights into customer 
requirements and order patterns. We 
were also delighted that our partnership 
with Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen 
was approved by the Civil Aviation 
Administration of China to perform repair 
and overhaul services for our market-
leading fire detectors.
Competitiveness 
We have no higher priority than ensuring 
a safe and secure working environment for 
all employees. As well as the continued 
provision of additional measures at 
each site to protect our people and 
reduce the risk of infection, we delivered 
an improvement in our overall safety 
performance with our Total Recordable 
Incident Rate for the year reaching its 
lowest level to date at 0.63 (FY 2020: 0.71).
We have commissioned our Ansty 
Park facility, our state-of-the-art UK 
engineering and advanced manufacturing 
centre of excellence and global 
headquarters. The site is one of the 
biggest investments in UK manufacturing 
in a decade as well as being Meggitt’s 
largest infrastructure investment in 
its history. The transition included the 
closure of five UK sites and the transfer 
of over 1,000 employees and 1,700 
separate pieces of equipment with the 
site housing our Thermal and Braking 
Systems product groups as well as our 
European Services & Support hub for 
MRO and spares. Having attained CAA 
and BSI approvals, we are conducting 
direct customer shipments from the site. 
We are pleased with the operation of the 
site in these early stages and supported 
our customers well over the traditionally 
busy final quarter. We look forward to 
further productivity improvements as 
the new ways of working at Ansty are 
further embedded.
In line with our footprint reduction 
strategy, we concluded the sale of our 
Dunstable and Toulouse sites, with the 
closure of a further two sites planned for 
2021 moving into 2022. At the end of the 
year we had a total of 36 manufacturing 
locations, representing a 36% reduction 
in our global footprint since 2016 and 
remain on track with our target to reduce 
footprint by 50% by the end of 2023.
We made good progress in Engine 
Composites, following our investments in 
engineering and process improvements 
at our Erlanger and Saltillo sites and 
have received further customer approvals 
for direct shipment of our high-volume 
products from our site in Saltillo, Mexico.
We deployed our High Performance 
System (HPS), which replaces and builds 
on the Meggitt Production System (MPS) 
and is designed to measure and drive 
efficiency across all Group functions and 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
12

sites. All sites have been assessed in line 
with the framework and action plans have 
been created to deliver improvements.
A key area of focus for the Group in 2021, 
which we expect to continue in 2022, 
has been managing the procurement of 
materials into our sites against a backdrop 
of global supply chain disruption as 
demand levels in civil aerospace have 
increased. We have deployed dedicated 
resources and new tools to improve 
access to critical materials, with the 
main priority being to continue to satisfy 
customer orders. We have also taken the 
opportunity during the year to further 
develop our supply chain function by: 
continuing to enhance our processes; 
upskilling our teams; rationalising our 
supply base; and increasing the use of 
analytics and automation.
Culture
Our work on culture continues to be a 
key part of our overall Group strategy, 
to accelerate our progress towards 
becoming a truly integrated global 
business and cultivating a culture of 
high performance. In 2021, we focused 
our efforts on protecting our people, 
employee and leadership development, 
diversity and inclusion and employee 
engagement and recognition. 
We continue to invest in talent 
through our graduate and apprentice 
programmes. Following nearly a decade 
of success with our Engineering & 
Operations Graduate programme, 
we launched our Corporate Graduate 
Programme to business functions in the 
UK promoting professional development 
opportunities across Finance, Corporate 
Affairs and IT. Alongside this, the Ansty 
Park facility welcomed its first degree 
apprentices and across the Group 
we now have over 100 graduates and 
apprentices. We also participated in the 
10,000 Black Interns programme in the 
UK in anticipation of hiring a number of 
interns in 2022.
In the first half we also launched two new 
training programmes: Spitfire for our 
Operations leaders and LeadX, which 
embed and reinforce concepts from our 
High Performance Culture work for our 
future business leaders.
During 2021 we saw continued progress 
with our work on High Performance 
Culture despite extremely challenging 
COVID-19 travel restrictions and 
lockdowns. Nearly 70% of employees 
have now attended training sessions.  
We made excellent progress in the 
number of employees engaged with 
our Employee Resource Groups (ERG), 
doubling membership to over 1,000. We 
held our annual Diversity and Inclusion 
week with 18 sites hosting events 
along with virtual sessions focused on 
introducing employees to our ERGs and 
providing learning and development 
opportunities on various topics. 
We also hosted numerous events 
throughout the year to increase awareness 
and visibility including: celebrating 
International Women’s Day and Women 
in Engineering Day, Pride Week and 
Black History month in the US and UK. 
Employees also took part in the Steps 
for Vet’s Challenge, Remembrance Day 
Celebrations and joined talks on Latino 
History. Additionally, in support of Suicide 
prevention week, our SHINE ERG hosted 
“Subject Matter Expert” talks at multiple 
sites and provided Mental Health First 
Responders training. We also launched 
Community Heroes, our community 
and charity outreach programme, which 
enables employees to volunteer for local 
good causes in their community.
Our progress on culture, throughout a 
particularly challenging period for the 
Group and our teams over the last two 
years, has been reflected in our recent 
employee survey, with engagement 
levels increasing by 2% above 2020 
levels and 4% above the global high 
performing benchmark.
Outlook
Building on the positive momentum 
in 2021 and good order intake at the 
end of the year, the outlook for our civil 
aerospace business is encouraging. 
However, with a number of countries still 
experiencing high infection rates and with 
travel restrictions in place, forecasting 
the pace and trajectory of this recovery 
remains difficult, particularly in the short 
term. The prospects for our energy and 
defence end markets are expected to 
remain solid. 
Looking ahead, based on the significant 
progress we have made to transform the 
Group, our diverse end-market exposure 
and leading market positions, we are well 
placed to benefit from the recovery in 
civil aerospace and to deliver long-term 
profitable growth.
Since the Group is in an offer period 
under the UK Takeover Code, we are not 
providing financial guidance for 2022, nor 
are we able to comment on expected 
performance relative to any analyst 
forecasts that may be available. 
Tony Wood
Chief Executive Officer
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
13
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Strategy in action
IMAGES: A colleague demonstrates how 
Meggitt are using augmented reality to 
train operators without needing to travel. 
Another colleague uses his Hololens to  
run Visual Factory work instructions.
Digital and additive manufacturing technologies are being used across 
Meggitt to make products in new and unique ways, to improve productivity 
and to reduce waste.
Digital work instructions allow complex 
parts to be assembled by skilled 
technicians whilst efficiently collecting 
all of the information that is needed in 
aerospace’s highly regulated market. 
Replacing the traditional paper-based 
systems, that are still widely used in 
the aerospace sector, has increased 
productivity and allowed the operators 
to focus on the critical aspects of 
building the products.
Connecting machining and inspection 
tools into the same ecosystem is 
driving further improvements in 
productivity and augmented reality 
adds another dimension, enabling
operators to work with a digital overlay 
to what they are seeing in the physical 
world and to interact with colleagues 
across our global factories. 
Additive manufacturing is another 
technology that has come of age in the 
manufacturing environment where fittings 
and tools can now be quickly designed 
and printed to meet local needs. 
There are many more opportunities 
for us to integrate digital technologies 
into our operations and processes, as 
we continue to investigate possibilities 
we are driving fundamental change, 
both in how we operate and how we 
deliver value to our customers. 
12%
average efficiency gain in  
teams adopting Visual Factory
c. 7,000 
labour hours saved on one  
pilot product line between 
Jan 21 – Dec 21 compared 
with 2020 baseline
At Meggitt we are developing both next generation products 
and advanced manufacturing technologies to make them 
efficiently and sustainably.
TECHNOLOGY.
Our strategic priorities are underpinned by 
our three Corporate Responsibility pillars. 
 Read more about our Technology pillar on page 83
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
14

Delivering breakthrough performance
STRATEGIC
PORTFOLIO
Through focusing on engineering and operational excellence,  
we build broad installed bases of equipment for which we  
provide support throughout their lifecycle.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
15
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Business model
How we create value through the investment cycle
Strong partnerships
We seek strong, collaborative and  
close relationships with our customers 
and suppliers. Our business cycle is 
multi-year, and we seek relationships  
to support this.
Market-leading technology
We invest in market-leading technology 
and robustly defend our intellectual 
property rights. We hold leading  
market positions across a number  
of product lines.
Maintaining a 
competitive 
advantage
What we do
Innovation is at the heart of what we do 
with safety, reliability, and operating and 
environmental performance underpinning 
our approach. 
By investing in and developing 
sustainable and differentiated 
technologies for application in our 
selected markets, including civil 
aerospace, defence and energy, 
we develop pioneering products in 
collaboration with our customers.
Our products are manufactured in our 
globally located facilities and we go 
to market through our four customer- 
aligned business divisions:
Differentiated  
technology
We invest in differentiated 
technologies for extreme 
environments with deep 
intellectual property.
As such, our products are  
hard to replicate with  
high barriers to entry.
Through-life  
Services & Support
We provide aftermarket  
services and support building 
longer-term, more durable and 
deep partnerships through 
SMARTSupport™.
 Strong content  
and sole source
We maximise our content  
on new-to-market platforms, 
where possible securing sole- 
source, life-of-programme  
positions across a diverse fleet  
of over 73,000 civil and  
military aircraft.
Outstanding  
operations
We value operational excellence  
as a strategic imperative, 
continuously striving to do things 
better through investment in our 
High Performance System and 
initiatives such as our Operations 
Academy and campus at  
Ansty Park.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
16

Diverse end markets
We have diverse end-market exposure 
with our technology and products utilised 
in a large fleet across civil, defence and 
selected energy markets.
World-class services and support
Our customers demand high quality, 
timely services and support to maximise 
the value of our products through  
their lifecycles.
Strong values
Our values underpin what we do and 
are supported by HPC. Our people 
collaborate to create value by combining 
extensive technical capabilities and long-
standing sector knowledge.
How we 
share value
Customers
We develop innovative and differentiated 
technology for our customers, that 
anticipates future market demand and 
meets high certification requirements.
Equity and debt holders
Over the last five years we have returned 
£373m to our shareholders through 
dividends and paid £166m in interest to 
our holders of debt.
Employees
We employ over 9,000 people and in 
2021 paid over £568m in wages, salaries 
and employee benefits.
Governments
We paid over £80m in social security 
and corporation taxes to governments in 
2021. The Group’s employees also paid 
a share of their wages and salaries to 
governments through income taxes.
Suppliers
Over the last five years, through our 
central procurement function, we have 
paid c.£4.5bn to our suppliers.
Aerospace, defence and aero-derived energy 
We secure content across a broad range of platforms in civil aerospace,  
defence and selected energy end markets, generating original equipment (OE) 
revenue from day one and a growing aftermarket (AM) revenue stream as the fleet 
grows over time.
Aftermarket annuity
Leveraging our long-term customer relationships, strong IP and differentiated 
technology we have secured increased content on the latest generation of platforms. 
Our business model is to grow and constantly refresh our aftermarket revenue 
providing a strong annuity revenue stream for years to come.
Airframe Systems
Engine Systems
Energy & Equipment
Services & Support
Through our Services 
& Support division and 
SMARTSupport™ (our 
brand name for a range 
of tailored, longer-term, 
aftermarket offerings), 
we provide a tailored 
package of spare parts 
and repair services to our 
customers depending on 
their requirements to fit 
their operational model.
Aftermarket revenue (£)
Time
Legacy platforms
Younger platforms
New and future platforms
Illustrative
Annual revenue (£)
Entry in service
25 years
Fleet size/deliveries
Product  
development
Revenue from aftermarket 
grows over the life of the 
programme
Revenue from original 
equipment as OEMs 
produce each new aircraft
Annual deliveries
Total fleet
Illustrative
Production
Post Production
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
17
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Strategy in action
Enhancing lives by keeping 
the lights on for our
CUSTOMERS
Connecting valuable components to new opportunities. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
18

We repair through all stages of lifecycle, offering our global customers 
a more cost-efficient, sustainable way to stay airborne for longer.
For airline operators, scheduled 
maintenance is a way of life. Ensuring 
passenger safety, reliability and 
operational efficiency. An aircraft on 
ground (AOG) due to component 
failure not only results in lost 
passenger and cargo revenue, but 
there are also significant associated 
costs. New for old is not the most 
cost-efficient route and it isn’t the 
most sustainable either. 
We harvest and refurbish Meggitt parts 
from retired aircraft and offer them 
to our customers as a convenient, 
cost-efficient alternative to brand-new 
spares. Known as Used Serviceable 
Material (USM), this solution optimises 
product lifecycle, giving high quality, 
recertified parts a second chance to fly 
as well as offering a more sustainable 
alternative. For example, a USM fire 
extinguishing bottle can be seen in the 
image below.
End-of-life recycling is another 
major part of our SMARTSupport™ 
value proposition.
3 
Global regional centres  
of excellence in EMEA,  
Asia and the Americas
It’s fair to say that when a Meggitt part enters service it’s in 
it for the long haul.
IMAGES: Colleagues from the 
SmartScoping team within Meggitt’s 
Services & Support division take part  
in a Daily Layered Accountability  
meeting (DLA). 
An electromechanical valve is repaired  
at Ansty Park, UK.
PLANET.
Our strategic priorities are underpinned by 
our three Corporate Responsibility pillars. 
 Read more about our Planet pillar on page 78
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
19
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Market trends
Revenue
£260m
Market segments 
•	 Large jets >100 seats 
•	 Regional jets <100 seats 
•	 Business jets
•	 Civil helicopters
Revenue by platform category
 Large jets
66%
 Regional jets
6%
 Business jets
28%
Annual commercial deliveries1
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
1,372
693
918
1,196
1,474
1,422
125
126
224
1,586 235
262
290
287
 Large jets
 Regional jets
Annual business jet deliveries
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
609
560
710
625
643
651
2016
2022 outlook
OEM production rates expected to 
increase versus 2021 levels, as airframe 
and engine manufacturers begin 
to gradually increase supply as the 
recovery continues and demand for 
new aircraft increases.
Business jet deliveries are expected 
to be slightly up on 2021 reflecting 
the continued recovery and customer 
demand in this segment.
Backlog for new aircraft remains 
healthy reflecting expectations of 
continued fleet renewal and strong 
long-term fundamentals.
Over the medium term air traffic is 
expected to return to pre-COVID 
levels by 2023/24 and then continue 
growing. This will then feed through to 
increased deliveries of new aircraft.
Civil original equipment
2021 market trends
•	 Increase in new build rates by airframe 
and engine OEMs as demand for new 
aircraft continued to recover during  
the year.
•	 Increase of 32% in combined deliveries 
of large jets from Airbus and Boeing.
•	 Deliveries of regional aircraft in line 
with 2020 with growth in business jets 
of 9%.
•	 	Continued approvals for the return to 
service of the Boeing 737MAX with the 
aircraft authorised in 180 countries.
Meggitt performance in 2021
•	 Civil OE revenue down 10% organically 
with growth of 17% in the second half 
(vs. H2 2020), reflecting the gradual 
recovery in civil aerospace.
•	 In large jets, the largest component 
of our civil OE revenue (66%), organic 
revenue was down 13% driven by lower 
wide body demand including the B787, 
B777 and A350XWB.
•	 OE revenue from business jets (28%  
of civil OE revenue) was down 4% on 
an organic basis.
•	 OE revenue from regional jets (6%  
of civil OE revenue) was 7% lower on 
an organic basis.
1	 Excludes military variants.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
20

Revenue
£425m
Market segments 
•	 Large jets >100 seats 
•	 Regional jets <100 seats 
•	 Business jets
•	 Civil helicopters
Revenue by platform category
 Large jets
54%
 Regional jets
20%
 Business jets
26%
Average monthly  
commercial active fleet
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
74%
65%
90%
91%
91%
91%
90%
Average monthly  
commercial ASKs (Mn)
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
446 
848 
794 
745 
693 
2016
380 
2022 outlook
The continued rollout of vaccines and 
significant pent up demand to travel 
expected to underpin the continued 
recovery in civil aerospace.
Pace and trajectory of the recovery 
in the short term expected to remain 
sensitive to regional outbreaks and 
local restrictions.
Domestic travel, business jets and 
regional aircraft expected to continue 
to lead the recovery.
Industry expectation that air traffic 
activity will return to 2019 levels by 
2023/24.
Beyond the recovery period, the 
fundamental drivers supporting air 
traffic growth over the long term 
remain in place, with global passenger 
growth of 3.3% (IATA) per annum 
expected over the next 20 years.
Civil aftermarket
2021 market trends
•	 Continued recovery in flight activity 
with global RPKs and ASKs for the 
month of December 2021 up 80% and 
46% versus December 2020.
•	 Active fleet up to 79% at the end of 
2021 having started the year at 68%.
•	 Trajectory and pace of recovery 
remained sensitive to regional 
outbreaks of COVID-19 and associated 
restrictions on travel.
•	 Recovery led by domestic travel, with 
global domestic ASKs for the month 
of December 2021 up 15% versus 
December 2020, representing 85% of 
2019 levels.
•	 Strong recovery in business jets with 
activity levels up 48% for the full year, 
with activity for the month of December 
2021 at 123% of December 2019 levels.
Meggitt performance in 2021
•	 Group civil AM revenue up 7% 
organically with large jets up 1%, 
regional aircraft up 6% and business 
jets up 21%.
•	 Strong civil AM growth of 51%  
in the second half on an organic basis.
•	 Civil AM organic orders up 50% in the 
year with growth of 119% in the second 
half and book to bill of 1.11x.
•	 Good performance in brakes with 
revenue up 22% organically, with 
growth across all platform categories.
•	 On a regional basis in Services & 
Support: revenue in Asia and the US 
up 7% and 2% respectively with Europe 
down 18%, all on an organic basis.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
21
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Market trends
continued
Revenue 
£620m
Market segments 
•	 Military aircraft & helicopters 
•	 Ground vehicles
•	 Naval
•	 Space
Group defence revenue 
by platform category
 Fighter/attack
36%
 Light attack
5%
 Rotary wing
28%
 Special mission
3%
 Transports
8%
 Ground/naval
20%
US DoD Spending ($bn)
134
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
    Procurement
    Research, Development, Test & Evaluation
    Other
92
95
105
106
112
432
442
444
456
469
142
146
147
147
Group defence revenue 
by geography
 Rest of Europe
15%
 Rest of the World
9%
 UK
4%
 US
72%
2022 outlook
Defence expenditure in the US, our 
most important defence market 
representing 72% of total Group 
defence revenue expected to 
remain stable.
US defence budget for 2022 approved 
at $715 billion representing an increase 
of 2% on 2021.
While most major defence spending 
nations are committed to maintaining 
defence spending, an increasing 
proportion is expected to be allocated 
to cyber, autonomy, space, maritime 
and weapon systems.
Defence
2021 market trends
•	 US Department of Defence outlays 
in the US up 4% for fiscal year 2021.
•	 Outlays for Procurement and RDT&E 
up 6% and 2% respectively.
•	 After a period of robust spending 
between 2017-2019, inventory 
destocking by the Defence Logistics 
Agency (DLA) lowered demand 
for aftermarket spares.
Meggitt performance in 2021
•	 After three years of strong growth, 
Group defence revenue ended the 
year 11% lower on an organic basis.
•	 OE revenue down 7% and aftermarket  
down 17% on an organic basis versus 
the comparative period.
•	 Performance reflects inventory 
destocking, lower orders by the US 
Defence Logistics Agency in the 
aftermarket and COVID-related 
disruption at two of our US sites  
in the year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
22

Revenue 
£184m
Market segments 
•	 Power generation
•	 Oil & Gas
•	 Renewables
Global investment in the power 
sector by technology1
 Battery storage
 Renewable power
 Electricity network
1%
 Fossil fuel power
14%
 Nuclear
5%
45%
35%
Group energy revenue by 
application
 Oil
 Other
7%
 Low carbon (vs. Oil)
70%
 Zero carbon
10%
13%
2022 outlook
Medium-term growth expectations for 
our energy businesses remain good.
We have differentiated technology 
which plays a critical role in the 
extraction of deep water offshore 
gas reserves and good opportunities 
in adjacent markets including LNG 
and increasingly lower carbon and 
renewable applications.
Our energy businesses benefit from 
synergistic relationships across the 
Group, e.g. thermal systems for the 
aerospace market, as well as the long-
term demand for energy, particularly in 
emerging markets.
Energy and other
2021 market trends
•	 Oil prices increased 76% from a low in 
January reaching an in-year high of $85 
per barrel in October, before ending 
the year at $75 per barrel.
•	 Capital expenditure levels on energy 
projects remained strong, particularly in 
the renewables space where a number 
of large projects were commissioned.
•	 Growth driven by increasing electricity 
demand supplied by gas-fired 
power plants and renewable power 
generation systems.
•	 High gas prices have added to interest 
in investment in LNG production 
and transport.
Meggitt performance in 2021
•	 Energy revenue was up 6% in the year 
on an organic basis with 8% growth 
in the second half.
•	 Organic revenue in our Heatric and 
Energy Sensing & Controls businesses 
up 5% and 12% respectively.
•	 Revenue from other markets was 8% 
lower versus the comparative period 
on an organic basis.
1	 International Energy Agency (2021), 
World Energy Investment 2021, IEA, Paris.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
23
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
STRATEGIC 
PORTFOLIO
Focus areas
–	 Investment in sustainable and differentiated technologies.
–	 Increasing our exposure to attractive markets where 
we have strong competitive positions.
2021 progress
–	 Sale of our ducting business and closure of our site 
in Toulouse as part of our strategy to consolidate our 
Power & Sensing capabilities.
–	 Successfully delivered all key technology 
programme milestones.
–	 Continued investment in differentiated technologies 
to contribute to a Net Zero Future including those to 
support our customers in the development of next 
generation aviation and low-carbon energy applications.
–	 Intensified focus on returns across our product portfolio.
2022 priorities
–	 Continue to invest at least two-thirds of our Research 
and Technology innovation budget in technologies for 
sustainable aviation and low-carbon energy.
–	 Continue to progress technology and product 
development programmes with our customers.
–	 Focus on opportunities to grow revenue in defence 
and energy.
Key risks
Business model
Failure to respond to fundamental changes in our 
aerospace business model.
 
CUSTOMERS
Focus areas
–	 Supporting customers through the civil aerospace 
recovery as demand and production levels increased.
–	 Growing our market share in the aftermarket.
–	 Consolidating our customer-aligned organisation.
2021 progress 
–	 Customer-aligned organisation key to managing the 
recovery in both OE production and the aftermarket.
–	 Continued to win new customer orders across civil 
aerospace, defence and energy.
–	 Customer awards for our Airframes Systems Rockmart 
and Engine Systems San Diego sites in the US.
–	 11 SMARTSupport™ deals signed in the year taking 
total number of contracts to 55 with an aggregate 
value of £223m.
–	 Investment to broaden our offering and capability 
across our three aftermarket Centres of Excellence 
in Singapore, UK and the US.
–	 Worked closely with customers on key sustainability 
programs for aerospace and energy.
2022 priorities
–	 Continue to support our customers through the 
recovery as activity levels continue to increase.
–	 Continue to focus on operational improvements to 
drive customer satisfaction.
–	 Grow our market share in the aftermarket by securing 
additional SMARTSupport™ agreements.
–	 Continue to support customers and their net 
zero ambitions.
Key risks
Customer satisfaction
Failure to meet customers’ cost, quality and delivery 
standards as preferred suppliers.
Our strategy
continued
As the recovery in civil aerospace continued during 2021, we remained focused on 
operational execution and our four strategic priorities to accelerate growth, increase 
cash flow and improve return on capital employed. These priorities are:  
Strategic Portfolio, Customers, Competitiveness and Culture.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
24

COMPETITIVENESS
Focus areas
–	 Ensuring readiness across our global sites as OE build 
rates and aftermarket demand increases. 
–	 Driving productivity improvements across all sites.
–	 Building a resilient and optimised supply chain 
delivering further purchase cost savings.
–	 Optimising factory footprint.
2021 progress 
–	 Completed commissioning of our Ansty Park, UK 
facility including customer transitions. 
–	 Deployment of Meggitt High Performance System 
(HPS) to drive process maturity.
–	 Embedded Spitfire operational leadership programme. 
–	 Good progress streamlining our UK Polymers and 
Composites business.
–	 Further reduction in our global footprint with 36 sites 
at the end of 2021, a 36% reduction compared with 
our 2016 baseline.
–	 Implementation of greater automation and advanced 
digital manufacturing at our sites.
–	 Further product transfers to low-cost manufacturing.
–	 Delivered improved safety performance recording 
lowest ever TRIR of 0.63.
2022 priorities
–	 Continue to manage raw material and labour cost 
inflation across global supply chain. 
–	 Continue footprint consolidation to reach our goal of 
50% reduction by end 2023.
–	 Drive environmental and sustainability improvements 
across our sites.
–	 Roll out “Safety Star Program” to reinforce site safety.
Key risks
Project/programme management & inflation
Failure to meet new product programme milestones or 
lower than expected production volumes.
Increase in raw material and input costs.
CULTURE
Focus areas
–	 Protecting our people.
–	 Recruiting, retaining, developing and engaging talent.
–	 Embedding a high performance, diverse and  
inclusive culture.
–	 Supporting our local communities.
2021 progress 
–	 Continued investment in talent through our graduate 
and apprentice programmes.
–	 Continued commitment to High Performance 
Culture with 70% of employees having attended 
training sessions.
–	 Successfully launched “LeadX” leadership programme.
–	 Doubled membership of our eight Employee 
Resource Groups to over 1,000 employees.
–	 Adoption of flexible working guidelines.
–	 Participated in 10,000 Black Interns programme.
–	 Increase of 2% in employee engagement versus 2020, 
4% above high performance benchmark.
2022 priorities
–	 Continue to protect employees across our global sites.
–	 Complete rollout of HPC training across the Group 
and reinforce HPC principles through our LeadX and 
Spitfire leadership programmes.
–	 Continue to strengthen our approach to inclusion 
and diversity. 
–	 Encourage our people to engage with local 
communities and charities through our Community 
Heroes volunteering programme.
Key risks
People
Failure to attract, motivate and retain people due to lack 
of opportunities and/or training.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
25
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Key performance indicators
Link to strategic priorities
Strategic Portfolio
Customers
Competitiveness
Culture
1
2
3
4
The Group uses a mix of financial and 
non-financial key performance indicators 
(KPIs) to measure execution against 
our strategic objectives. To ensure we 
deliver value to our shareholders over 
the investment cycle, financial KPIs 
balance short-term measures (underlying 
operating profit and free cash flow in the 
year) with longer-term measures (return 
on capital employed and underlying 
EPS growth). Non-financial KPIs focus 
on investment in R&D to drive future 
revenues, the health and safety of our 
employees and raising standards of 
operational performance to satisfy our 
customers whilst also managing our 
impact on our wider environment. The 
Group adopted IFRS 15 and IFRS 16 with 
effect from 1 January 2018, with prior 
year comparatives for 2017 restated. 
For 2017, EPS growth compared to 
performance in 2016, is not fully restated, 
though it does reflect the requirement 
to expense free of charge manufactured 
parts (FOC) as incurred under IFRS 15, 
rather than initially recognising costs as 
an intangible asset and then amortising 
them over their useful lives. The Group’s 
performance against climate change 
objectives continues to be a focus. After 
a trial during 2021, from 2022 onwards, 
the Group will include measures 
supporting the Group’s environmental 
commitments in its KPI monitoring, and 
also in the Group’s 2022 LTIP Award. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
26

Underlying operating 
profit (UOP)
1
3
4
Performance
£177.3m
Underlying operating profit
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
177.3 
190.5 
402.8 
367.3 
353.3 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Underlying operating profit is defined 
and reconciled to statutory measures 
in note 9 to the Group’s consolidated 
financial statements on page 197.
  Read more on page 132
Target
As part of the Group’s Q3 2021 Trading 
Update the Group guided that FY 2021 
underlying operating profit would be 
between £170m – £190m. The Group 
does not typically publish profit targets.
Result
2021: £177.3m. See page 42 for details. 
  Read more on page 132
Directors’ incentive plans
Underlying operating profit was a 
performance measure in the 2021 STIP 
and is a measure for the 2022 STIP. The 
2021 STIP outturn fell between Threshold 
and Target. It is expected that a 
proportion of the STIP bonus will be paid 
in respect of 2021.
For the purposes of these plans, actual 
and target underlying operating profit 
are measured at constant currency. See 
pages 132 and 142 for details.
Return on capital 
employed (ROCE)
1
3
4
Performance
5.3%
ROCE
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
5.3% 
5.2% 
11.0% 
10.0% 
9.4% 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Return on capital employed is underlying 
operating profit expressed as a 
percentage of average capital employed 
(i.e. the underlying return on average 
capital employed).
Capital employed is defined as net assets 
excluding net debt, retirement benefit 
obligations net of associated deferred 
tax and derivative financial instruments. 
Average capital employed is the mean 
of the period’s opening and closing 
capital employed.
Target
As LTIP ROCE targets are set over a 
three-year period, there is no specific 
target for 2021 alone. Details of the 
ROCE target from the 2021 LTIP are 
shown on page 135.
Result
2021: 5.3%. Three-year average ROCE to 
2021 was 7.1%. 
  Read more on page 134
Directors’ incentive plans
ROCE is a performance measure for 
Executive Directors in the 2019, 2020 and 
2021 LTIP. ROCE will be a performance 
measure in the 2022 LTIP. For the 
purposes of these plans, underlying 
operating profit and capital employed 
are measured at constant currency. See 
pages 135 and 142 for details.
Underlying 
EPS growth
1
2
3
4
Performance
-6.7%
Underlying EPS growth
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
-6.7% 
 -55.8% 
9.1% 
6.9% 
-1.5% 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
The percentage change in underlying 
earnings per share (EPS) from the 
previous year. Underlying EPS is defined 
and reconciled to statutory measures 
in note 14 to the Group’s consolidated 
financial statements.
  Read more on page 201
Target
We do not typically publish profit targets. 
As LTIP underlying EPS targets are set 
over a three-year period, there are no 
specific targets for 2021 alone. Details of 
the underlying EPS target from the 2021 
LTIP are shown on page 135. 
Result
2021: -6.7%. See page 42 for details. 
  Read more on page 171
Directors’ incentive plans
Underlying EPS is a performance measure 
for the 2019, 2020 and 2021 LTIPs, and is 
proposed for the 2022 Award. See pages 
135 and 142 for details.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
27
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Key performance indicators
continued
 
Free cash flow
1
2
3
4
Performance
£45.7m
Free cash flow
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
 45.7 
 
 31.9
267.8 
167.4 
197.4 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Cash generated excluding amounts in 
respect of the proposed acquisition and 
disposal of businesses and payments to 
shareholders. Free cash flow is reconciled 
to statutory measures in note 42 of the 
Group’s consolidated financial statements 
on page 228.
  Read more on page 132
Target
We do not typically publish free cash flow 
targets. At the start of 2021, the Group was 
expecting to maintain a positive free cash 
flow through 2021. This view was maintained 
in the Q3 2021 Trading Update. 
Result
2021: £45.7m. This was in line with the 
Q3 2021 Trading Update. Free cash flow 
before tax and interest is a measure in the 
2021 STIP. However, the 2021 outturn did 
not trigger vesting and no bonus will be 
paid on this component of the 2021 STIP.
  Read more on page 44
Directors’ incentive plans
Free cash flow is a performance measure for 
the 2021 and 2022 STIP. For the purpose of 
these plans, actual and target free cash flow 
figures are measured at constant currency 
and exclude interest and tax. See pages 132 
and 142 for details.
 
R&D investment
1
2
3
4
Performance
4.7%
R&D investment
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
4.7% 
5.8% 
5.2% 
6.6% 
7.9% 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Investment in research and development 
expressed as a percentage of revenue. 
Investment is measured as total 
expenditure in the year as disclosed 
in note 7 to the Group’s consolidated 
financial statements on page 196. It is 
not adjusted for amounts capitalised, 
amortised, impaired or incurred on 
contracts funded by customers.
  Read more on page 181
Target
Investment of 5% to 7% per annum. 
The range reflects typical investment 
fluctuations within the industry cycle. 
Result
2021: 4.7%. Average over the last three 
years 5.3%. 
  Read more on page 44
Directors’ incentive plans
R&D investment is not a specific 
measure used in Directors’ incentive 
plans. However, the 2019, 2020 and 2021 
LTIPs include programme performance 
measures which include the effective 
delivery of R&D programmes. This same 
measure is proposed for 2022 LTIP. See 
pages 135 and 142 for details.
Total recordable 
incident rate (TRIR)
1
2
3
4
Performance
0.6
Accident/incident rate Group
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
0.6 
0.7 
0.7 
0.8 
1.2 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
The total recordable safety incident 
rate calculated per 100 employees. It is 
calculated as the number of recordable 
incidents multiplied by 200,000 and then 
divided by the total number of hours 
worked during the year.
  Read more on page 76
Target
In 2021, the Group had a TRIR target of 
less than or equal to 0.7 For 2022, the 
target is 0.6. 
Result
2021: 0.6. The Group has been collecting 
TRIR data for this KPI since 2017. See 
page 133 for details. 
  Read more on page 76
Directors’ incentive plans
Health and safety performance is not 
a specific measure used in Directors’ 
incentive plans. However, improvement 
in health and safety is included in the 
personal objectives of the Chief Executive 
in the 2021 STIP.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
28

 
Inventory turns
1
2
3
4
Performance
2.2x
Inventory turns
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2.2 
2.1 
2.7 
2.7 
2.5 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Underlying cost of sales divided by average inventory measured at constant currency 
and excluding businesses acquired or disposed of in the year. Underlying cost of sales 
adjusts cost of sales for the impact of items which are excluded from the Group’s 
underlying profit measures as disclosed in note 9 to the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements on page 197. Average inventory is calculated as the 13-month average of 
inventory, gross of provision, at the end of the previous financial year and at the end 
of each month of the current year. To measure inventory at constant currency, average 
inventory of foreign subsidiaries is translated at average exchange rates for the year.
In 2021, the Group updated its inventory turns definition. Annualised underlying cost of 
sales is Q4 cost of sales, multiplied by 4. Average inventory is measured on a 4-month 
average to the month of reporting. Using this approach for 2021, inventory turns would 
fall to 2.0x vs. the 2.2x shown.  
  Read more on page 134
Target
The 2021 LTIP inventory turns target was 2.8 for 2021 using the 4-month average measure. 
Result
2021: 2.0 (4-month measure); 2.2 (13-month measure) 
  Read more on page 134
Directors’ incentive plans
Inventory reduction is a performance measure for the 2019, 2020 and 2021 LTIP and is 
proposed as a measure for 2022. 2019 and 2020 use the 13-month average definition, 
whilst 2021 and 2022 use the 4-month average. 
 
Emissions intensity
1
2
3
4
Performance
36.9T/£m CO2e
Tonnes Scope 1 and 2 CO2e /
£m revenue
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
36.9 
52.8 
48.3 
55.1 
57.1 
Definition and basis 
of calculation 
Scope 1 and scope 2 CO2 equivalent 
emissions for the reporting period 
calculated using market-based reporting, 
divided by consolidated Group revenue. 
Market based reporting includes the 
impact of renewable energy contracts. Note 
that 2020 and 2021 reporting includes the 
impact of propane consumption.
  Read more on page 82
Target
The Group has a target to reduce its 
greenhouse gas emissions relative to 
revenue by 50%, against a base year 
of 2015, by 31 December 2025 and 
includes the impact of incorporating 
renewables energy contracts (market 
based reporting). All site level targets use 
location-based reporting to drive local 
abatement and energy efficiency.
Result
2021: CO2e equivalent tonnes per £m 
revenue of 36.9, a reduction of 54% vs. 
a 2015 baseline.
  Read more on page 82
Directors’ incentive plans
Emissions intensity is being introduced 
for the first time to the Group’s 2022 LTIP 
Award. The overall Group target of a 50% 
reduction by December 2025 will also 
continue to be monitored by the Board.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
29
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Strategy in action
Enhancing lives through investing 
in continuous improvement and
COMPETITIVENESS
We are committed to spending two-thirds  
of investment in research and technology on 
developing technologies that support industries 
in the drive to become more sustainable.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
30

TECHNOLOGY.
Our strategic priorities are underpinned by 
our three Corporate Responsibility pillars. 
 Read more about our Technology pillar on page 83
The first ever commercial application of a MAN ETES heat pump system 
in the Danish port of Esbjerg. 
Developing technologies that provide real alternatives to fossil 
fuel power plants.
This groundbreaking solution offers a 
carbon-neutral alternative to traditional 
fossil fuel power plants, harnessing 
wind and seawater hydro power 
to supply energy to approximately 
100,000 local inhabitants. 
The MAN ETES heat pump installation 
is both the largest sea water heat 
pump in Denmark and the largest  
heat pump in the world to use CO2  
as a refrigerant. 
Meggitt PCHEs (Printed Circuit Heat 
Exchangers) are central to the system 
and provide the thermal transfer 
between the innovative CO2 refrigerant 
loop and the district heating network.
Gas turbines, fuelled with natural gas 
or hydrogen, will remain an important 
part of the world’s energy systems for 
the coming decades and Meggitt is 
partnering with some of the leading 
suppliers to develop technologies that 
continue to improve turbine efficiency 
and performance.
100% 
The ETES system achieves 
complete decarbonisation  
of the final energy demand
IMAGE: An example of 
a Meggitt PCHE (Printed 
Circuit Heat Exchanger).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
31
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Strategy in action
Enhancing lives by building 
an inclusive culture
CULTURE
Our people are at the centre of our  
sustainable future. They are the ones who  
enable our innovation, sustainable  
technologies and success.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
32

Our peer recognition scheme, “Extraordinary People”, gives each of us the 
opportunity to reward colleagues who live and breathe the core Meggitt 
values of Teamwork, Integrity and Excellence.
There are many things that go 
into being a truly great company – 
innovative technology and solutions, 
operations and functions performing at 
their best, and great relationships with 
our customers and each other. 
Our High Performance Culture and 
great values are at the heart of how 
we work at Meggitt. Colleagues that 
demonstrate great Teamwork, always 
acting with Integrity – doing the right 
thing, in the right way, and staying 
focused on Excellence for  
our customers. 
A culture of appreciation and 
recognition is an important building 
block for our values. Our new 
employee recognition programme 
“Extraordinary People” is a great 
way of recognising the special 
efforts and commitment of individual 
colleagues and teams across the whole 
of Meggitt.
4,000+
Nominations of Extraordinary 
People since the launch
Recognising our Extraordinary People. 
PEOPLE.
Our strategic priorities are underpinned by 
our three Corporate Responsibility pillars. 
 Read more about our People pillar on page 72
Sustainability
Safety
Customer Service
Innovation
Teamwork
Excellence
Community
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
33
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Divisional reviews
AIRFRAME 
SYSTEMS
Providing core components for original equipment airframe 
manufacturers and the Services & Support division across multiple 
platforms, and specialising in products designed to operate in 
demanding conditions across a diverse range of applications.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
34

What does the division do
Provides Braking Systems, Fire Protection 
& Safety Systems, Power & Motion, Fuel 
Systems, Avionics & Sensors and Polymer 
Seals for around 51,000 in-service civil and 
22,000 defence aircraft. As well as increasing 
our content on the new generation aircraft 
by as much as 250%, we also have a strong 
presence on all of the fastest growing and 
hardest worked defence platforms.
As such, we have strong relationships 
with all of the major OEMs, whether 
commercial, defence or business jet; fixed 
wing or rotorcraft; US, European or Rest 
of World. The division represents 50% 
of Group revenue, generating 52% of its 
revenue from OE sales and 48% from the 
aftermarket derived mainly from Braking 
Systems, with the remaining aftermarket 
revenue from other product groups 
reported in Services & Support. 
Highlights
•	 Progress on testing and certification 
with OEMs to qualify VERDAGENT®, 
Meggitt’s proprietary “green” fire 
suppressant; we have also been 
selected by Boeing to support their 
ecoDemonstrator programme with 
our CF3I engine fire suppressant 
delivery system.
•	 Supporting more electric flight, launched 
the development of an HVDC energy 
buffer to complement the primary 
electrical power source for a customer’s 
greener future platform architecture.
•	 Transfer of products associated with 
footprint consolidation with disposal of 
Toulouse site and associated product 
moves to sites in Europe and APAC.
•	 Significant investment in automation, 
lean production, testing capability and 
efficiency at our Rockmart facility in the US.
IMAGE: Swiss Airbus A320 pictured on take-off. 
President: Chris Allen
Revenue 
£737m
(2020: £793m)
Airframes
 Civil OE
23%
 Civil AM
27%
 Defence OE
27%
 Defence AM
20%
 Energy & other
3%
Divisional capabilities
–	 Wheels and brakes (including control 
and monitoring systems)
–	 Aircraft fire protection and safety systems
–	 Electro-thermal ice protection
–	 Power generation, conversion and storage
–	 Avionics and air data systems
–	 High performance sensors
–	 Flexible fuel tanks for defence and 
civil aircraft
–	 Sealing solutions
Markets
Civil aerospace
Fixed wing defence aircraft
Rotary wing defence aircraft
Unmanned aerial vehicles
•	 “Supplier of the Year 2021” award 
received from Bell, Boeing Defence 
at Rockmart facility.
2021 Performance 
Organic revenue was down 3% for the 
year (H1: -15%; H2: +12%) with civil 
aerospace revenue up 2% and defence 
revenue down 5%. 
Civil OE revenue was down 14% on an 
organic basis with growth of 7% in the 
second half reflecting the gradual recovery 
in OEM build rates during the year. Large 
jet and regional aircraft OE ended the 
period down 20% driven by lower widebody 
demand on the B787, B777 and A350XWB 
partially offset by growth on the A320 and 
A220 platforms. In regional aircraft, revenue 
was down 12% with business jets flat versus 
2020, outperforming large and regional jets 
on a relative basis. 
Civil aftermarket revenue grew by 20% on 
an organic basis driven by the recovery 
in demand in brakes with large, regional 
and business jets up 19%, 18% and 23% 
respectively. Brakes revenue increased by 
22% organically with good growth across 
a number of platforms including the A220 
in large jets, CRJ and ERJ fleets within 
regional aircraft and a number of business 
jet platforms. 
Defence revenue was down 5% on an 
organic basis, with OE 1% higher. In the 
defence aftermarket, revenue was 12% lower 
than the prior year, reflecting general market 
softness (including customer destocking) 
seen during the period and COVID-related 
disruption at one of our sites in the US.
Underlying operating profit was up 4% 
on an organic basis with underlying 
operating margin 110 basis points higher 
than the comparative period at 16.3% 
(FY 2020: 15.2%).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
35
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
ENGINE 
SYSTEMS
Divisional reviews
continued
Providing core technologies for engine manufacturers across  
a broad range of competencies including thermal management, 
engine sensing and advanced composites.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
36

What does the division do
Market-leading position in advanced 
engine composites, thermal and safety 
systems with a broad range of technologies 
including vibration monitoring and engine 
health management systems. This division 
also provides aerospace engine flow control 
and sensing solutions. Strong positions on 
high-volume platforms mean we are well 
positioned for growth in Engine Systems.
The division represents 14% of Group 
revenue, generating 91% of its revenue 
from OE and 9% from the aftermarket 
as a result of its principal route to the 
aftermarket being through the Services 
& Support division.
Highlights
•	 Established our new thermals 
headquarters at our Ansty Park facility.
•	 Good progress developing new 
products in the engine core to displace 
heat, increase efficiency, and reduce 
fuel, particularly projects to support 
next generation engine demonstrators.
•	 Transfer of high-volume engine 
composite parts to Saltillo, Mexico 
with customer approvals received from 
Pratt & Whitney and Safran for direct 
shipment on GTF and LEAP programmes.
•	 MBDA “Performance Excellence 
Award” at our site in San Diego.
•	 Completed sale of our ducting business 
based in Dunstable (UK) in January 2021.
IMAGE: A Meggitt colleague sets up a Mazak in our brand new thermal cell producing 
commercial and defence heat exchangers at Ansty Park, UK.
President: Troy Peterson
Revenue 
£208m
(2020: £253m)
Engines
 Civil OE
43%
 Civil AM
2%
 Defence OE
39%
 Defence AM
7%
 Energy & other
9%
Divisional capabilities
–	 Complex high-temperature engine 
composite components
–	 Control valves and sub-systems
–	 Engine sensors
–	 Thermal management
Markets
Civil aerospace
Fixed wing defence aircraft
Rotary wing defence aircraft
•	 Good progress with cost reduction, 
operating margin expansion, yield 
improvement and new technology 
development using optical and 
wireless systems.
2021 Performance
Revenue decreased by 10% (H1: -27%; 
H2: +10%) on an organic basis largely 
driven by defence where revenue ended 
the year down 18% due to a large, one 
-off order in the prior year and quality 
issues experienced in the first half from 
a key supplier which were subsequently 
resolved. Civil OE revenue was down 2% 
with growth of 41% in the second half 
all on an organic basis. Civil revenue in 
Engine Composites was flat year on year. 
Engine Systems generated an underlying 
operating loss of £16.5m (2020: loss of 
£16.2m) resulting from lower revenue 
and, as reported in our half year results, 
lower productivity in in the first quarter 
caused by COVID-related disruption at 
our US sites.
We made good progress on our recovery 
plan in Engine Composites, transferring 
more production down to our low cost 
facility in Saltillo, Mexico, as well as 
introducing further process improvements 
and increasing yields significantly on 
certain parts. As volumes recover in both 
civil and defence, we expect the financial 
performance of this product group to 
steadily improve with our ultimate target 
of mid-teens operating margins.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
37
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Divisional reviews
continued
Providing innovative, aero-derivative technologies with  
applications across the energy and defence sectors.
ENERGY &
EQUIPMENT
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
38

What does the division do
Energy & Equipment consists of our 
energy product groups and defence 
business that provide products directly 
to defence customers. Energy Sensors 
& Controls provides a range of valves, 
actuators, sensor and condition 
monitoring systems for oil and gas 
applications. Heatric provides innovative 
printed circuit heat exchanger technology 
for offshore gas applications. Defence 
Systems provides a series of complex 
engineered products to defence agencies 
in electronic cooling, ammunition 
handling and scoring systems. Energy 
& Equipment represents 18% of Group 
revenue and generates 84% of its revenue 
from OE and 16% from the aftermarket.
Highlights
•	 Supply by Heatric of its heat exchanger 
technology on the first commercial 
application of a MAN ETES (Electro- 
Thermal Energy Storage) heat pump, 
which harnesses wind and hydro power 
to supply energy.
•	 Provision of our optical dynamic 
pressure sensing technology on two 
demonstrator power stations.
•	 Secured a significant customer order 
with a major US turbines manufacturer 
for the sole-source supply of next 
generation valves.
•	 Continued progress on the transfer of 
high-volume parts to low-cost countries.
•	 Strong focus on operational 
performance and procurement 
initiatives to drive margin improvement.
IMAGE: Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHEs) being manufactured at our Heatric facility in 
Poole, UK.
President: Paul Devaux
Revenue 
£271m
(2020: £315m)
E&E
 Defence
47%
 Energy & other
53%
Divisional capabilities
–	 Combat support (ammunition handling, 
electronics cooling and countermeasure 
launch and recovery systems)
–	 Energy sensing and controls
–	 Vibration condition monitoring systems 
for energy markets
–	 Heat transfer equipment for offshore 
oil and gas
–	 Fuel handling
Markets
Defence ground vehicles
Defence and security
Energy and industrial
Ground fuelling
2021 Performance 
Revenue for the year was flat on 2021  
(H1: +4%; H2: -4%) on an organic basis 
with a good performance from energy 
offset by lower defence revenue. 
In energy, revenue grew by 9%, with 
Heatric revenue up 5% and sensing  
and controls up 12%. 
Defence revenue was 9% lower driven by 
lower rotary wing orders into our Defence 
Systems business.  
Underlying operating profit was 7% lower 
with operating margin at 15.6%, 120 
basis points higher than the comparative 
period (FY 2020: 14.4%).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
39
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Divisional reviews
continued
Providing throughlife MRO and spares services  
across our extensive installed base through  
our three regional hubs.
SERVICES &
SUPPORT
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
40

What does the division do
Services & Support provides a full-service 
aftermarket offering including spares 
distribution and MRO to our commercial, 
business jet and defence customer base 
throughout the lifecycle of our products. 
The division represents 18% of Group 
revenue and generates 100% of its 
revenue from the aftermarket. 
Highlights
•	 Continued delivery of strategic 
initiatives with consolidation of our 
MRO capabilities and expansion of our 
capacity in our three regional centres 
of excellence: Ansty Park in the UK, 
Singapore and Miami in the US.
•	 Enhanced maintenance forecasting 
capabilities leveraging best-in-class 
technologies to improve inventory 
management, reduce lead times and 
enhance customer service levels.
•	 Introduction of “Smart Scoping” in 
our three regional hubs to leverage 
engineering capabilities to increase 
efficiency and reduce MRO costs.
•	 Launched Customer Experience 
journey to streamline and improve 
customer interactions.
•	 Addition of 11 SMARTSupport™ 
agreements. 
IMAGE: A Meggitt colleague working on restraints at our Services & Support MRO Centre of 
Excellence which is located within Ansty Park, UK. 
President: Stewart Watson
Revenue 
£274m
(2020: £322m)
S&S
 Civil AM
80%
 Defence AM
20%
Divisional capabilities
–	 Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO)
–	 Spares provisioning
–	 SMARTSupport™
Markets
Civil aftermarket
Fixed wing defence 
aircraft AM
Energy and industrial
Rotary wing defence aircraft
2021 Performance 
Divisional revenue was 11% lower for 
the full year (H1: -27%; H2: +10%) on an 
organic basis, with civil aftermarket down 
3% and defence down 32%.
In civil aerospace, we saw good growth 
in both organic revenue and order 
intake in the second half up 31% and 
58% respectively, reflecting the overall 
recovery in the sector and book to bill of 
1.09x providing good momentum as we 
entered 2022. 
The differing pace and trajectory of the 
recovery across the world can be seen in 
the disparities in regional performance 
with our Asian and US businesses ending 
the year with organic revenue up 7% and 
2% respectively and Europe down 18%. 
Large jet revenue, which represented 
82% of Services & Support civil revenue, 
was down 3% in the year, with regional 
and business jets down 21% and up 
12% respectively. 
The softer performance in defence largely 
reflects lower orders from the Defense 
Logistics Agency in the US linked to the 
burn down of inventory after several years 
of robust spending to increase combat 
readiness. In the second half, we saw 
signs of an improving outlook with orders 
up 4% and book to bill for defence for the 
year at 1.14x.  
Underlying operating profit was 23% 
lower with underlying operating margin 
120 basis points lower at 11.5% (FY 
2020: 12.7%).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
41
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Chief Financial Officer’s review
We’ve remained focused on the continued 
stewardship of the Group through a second 
year of COVID-19, whilst protecting investment 
to support growth and the recovery.
Against the backdrop of a second year 
of COVID-19 and another challenging 
year for the civil aerospace sector, we 
remained focused on the continued 
stewardship of the Group while 
continuing to execute our strategy. 
We navigated the Group safely through 
2021, generating positive free cash flow, 
maintaining a robust balance sheet 
(net debt:EBITDA ratio of 1.9x) while 
protecting investment in key projects that 
will underpin the recovery and the return 
to growth. 
We also successfully refinanced the 
Group with a new, three-year, $410m 
revolving credit facility, which will 
continue to provide solid financial 
foundations as the recovery continues 
in 2022 and beyond.
Table 1 – Financial summary
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Growth %
Reported
Organic1
Orders
1,525.8
1,547.1
(1)
9
Revenue
1,489.2
1,684.1
(12)
(5)
Underlying2 
   EBITDA3 
291.0
296.9
(2)
3
   Operating profit
177.3
190.5
(7)
(3)
   Profit before tax
149.3
159.5
(6)
(4)
   Earnings per share (p)
15.4
16.5
(7)
Statutory
   Operating profit/(loss)
63.4
(297.3)
121
   Profit/(loss) before tax
31.3
(334.0)
109
   Earnings/(loss) per share (p)
4.0
(40.4)
110
Free cash flow4 
45.7
31.9
43
Net cash flow5 
58.8
136.0
(57)
Net debt
779.5
773.0
1
1	
Organic numbers exclude the impact of acquisitions, disposals and foreign exchange. 
2	
Underlying profit and EPS are used by the Board to measure the trading performance of the Group as set out in notes 9 and 14.
3	
Underlying EBITDA represents underlying operating profit adjusted to add back depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses.
4	
Free cash flow is used by the Board to measure the underlying trading cash performance of the Group as set out in note 42.
5	
Net cash flow represents the movement in net debt in the year, adjusted to exclude new lease liabilities entered, exchange differences and other non-cash movements.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
42

The work we have done in recent years 
to make the Group more competitive, 
including rationalising our global 
footprint, and the cost reduction 
measures taken in 2020 to resize the 
Group, means we are well placed to drive 
efficiency savings as volumes recover.
Our ability to realise some of these 
benefits in 2021 has been held back by 
input and labour cost inflation resulting 
from disruption across the global supply 
chain, and we expect some of this to 
continue in 2022. While we will continue to 
use a number of measures to offset these 
cost headwinds, including pricing, the 
long-term nature of some of our customer 
and supplier contracts may constrain our 
ability to do so in the short term.
Following completion of a consultation 
process, we closed the UK defined 
benefit scheme to future accrual in April 
2021, bringing it in line with the Group’s 
pension schemes in the US. 
We have also started preparations 
across the Group for the introduction of 
a UK Sarbanes-Oxley regime, which will 
reform the UK’s corporate governance, 
audit and reporting regimes with 
implementation expected to happen 
towards the end of 2023.
Finally, I would like to thank the finance 
team for their hard work and their 
valuable contribution to what has been 
another important year for the Group.
Group orders and revenue
While we have continued to see 
encouraging signs of the recovery in 
civil aerospace during 2021, with overall 
activity levels rising, an increase in Group 
civil aftermarket organic revenue and 
sequential increases in quarterly civil 
aerospace organic revenue, the Group’s 
full year results reflect the ongoing 
effects of COVID-19 and global supply 
chain disruption on the Group and the 
wider sector. 
Group and civil aerospace organic 
revenue were 16% and 26% lower 
respectively in the first half, reflecting the 
continuation of low levels of civil activity 
in 2021 and trading in the first quarter 
of 2020 being relatively unaffected by 
COVID-19. In the second half, Group 
civil aerospace organic revenue was 37% 
higher than the comparative period, with 
OE up 17% (large jets +15%, regional 
+42% and business jets +18%) and 
civil aftermarket up 51% on an organic 
basis (large jets +42%, regional +71% 
and business jets +58%). We also saw 
a continuation of the trend seen in the 
second quarter, with good sequential 
growth in civil aftermarket organic 
revenue in the third and fourth quarters. 
For the full year, Group orders were 
up 9% on an organic basis with book 
to bill of 1.01x. Our order book in civil 
aerospace saw strong organic growth 
with orders up 117% in the second half 
versus the comparative period and book 
to bill for the full year of 1.11x in both civil 
OE and civil aftermarket. 
Group revenue for the year was 5% lower 
on an organic basis with solid growth in 
energy and flat revenue in civil aerospace 
more than offset by softer defence where 
revenue was down 11% organically. In civil 
aerospace, organic revenue from civil OE 
and civil AM ended the year down 10% 
and up 7% respectively. Energy revenue 
increased by 6% on an organic basis. 
Reported Group revenue of £1,489.2m 
(FY 2020: £1,684.1m) was 12% lower as 
analysed in table 3.
Profit and earnings per share
As in previous years, underlying profit 
is used by the Board to measure the 
underlying trading performance of 
the Group and excludes certain items 
including: amounts arising on the 
acquisition, disposal and closure of 
businesses; amortisation of intangible 
assets acquired in business combinations; 
movements in financial instruments; 
and exceptional operating items. In 
2021, given their significance and that 
they relate to historic matters, certain 
Whittaker environmental costs have been 
recognised as an exceptional operating 
item (see Note 10). 
Group underlying operating profit on a 
reported basis was 7% lower in the year 
at £177.3m (FY 2020: £190.5m) as a result 
of the lower revenue, additional costs 
associated with COVID-19 and supply 
chain disruption and adverse currency 
movements. Underlying operating 
margins for the full year increased by 60 
basis points to 11.9% (FY 2020: 11.3%) 
with operating margin recovering strongly 
in the second half increasing 520 basis 
points compared with the first half. 
Underlying profit before tax decreased 
by 6% on a reported basis to £149.3m (FY 
2020: £159.5m) with underlying earnings 
per share 7% lower at 15.4 pence (FY 
2020: 16.5 pence). 
Moving from underlying to statutory 
measures, Group profit before tax was 
£31.3m (FY 2020: loss of £334.0m) and 
basic earnings per share was 4.0 pence 
(FY 2020: loss per share of 40.4 pence), 
with the prior year impacted by the non-
cash impairment of intangible assets and 
other asset write-downs. 
Divisional performance
The main focus areas across our four 
divisions in 2021 has been protecting 
Table 2 – Revenue growth
Revenue (£’m)
Growth (%)
2021
2020
Reported
Organic
Civil OE
260.2
306.0
(15)
(10)
Civil AM
424.7
419.6
1
7
Total civil
684.9
725.6
(6)
–
Defence
620.0
768.4
(19)
(11)
Energy
135.0
131.1
3
6
Other
49.3
59.0
(16)
(8)
TOTAL
1,489.2
1,684.1
(12)
(5)
Table 3 – Organic growth
Revenue
Underlying operating profit
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Growth %
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Growth %
1,489.2
(0.1)
72.3
1,684.1
(42.2)
(12) Reported
Impact of M&A1
Impact of currency2
177.3
0.2
10.0
190.5
3.7
(7)
1,561.4
1,641.9
(5) Organic
187.5
194.2
(3)
1	
Excludes the results of businesses acquired and disposed during the current and prior year or classified 
as held for sale. 
2 	 Restates the current year using 2020 translation and transaction exchange rates.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
43
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Table 4 – Operational highlights 
Revenue
Underlying Operating Profit/(Loss)
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
% Growth
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
% Growth
Reported
Organic
Reported
Organic
Airframe Systems
737.0
793.1
(7)
(3)
120.2
120.5
–
4
Engine Systems
207.8
253.3
(18)
(10)
(16.5)
(16.2)
(2)
(8)
Energy & Equipment
270.7
315.3
(14)
–
42.1
45.4
(7)
(5)
Services & Support
273.7
322.4
(15)
(11)
31.5
40.8
(23)
(18)
Total Group
1,489.2
1,684.1
(12)
(5)
177.3
190.5
(7)
(3)
Table 5 – Investing for the future	
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
% Growth
Reported
Organic
Total research and development (R&D)
70.7
97.9
(28)
(21)
   Less: Charged to cost of sales/WIP
(14.5)
(20.8)
(30)
(24)
   Less: Capitalised
(27.6)
(41.4)
(33)
(26)
   Add: Amortisation/Impairment
35.6
32.6
9
27
Charge to underlying net operating costs
64.2
68.3
(6)
4
Capital expenditure
69.7
89.7
Chief Financial Officer’s review
continued
our people, keeping our sites open 
and delivering for our customers and 
supporting our local communities. As a 
result of the increase in global demand 
as economies recovered in 2021, the 
divisions have had to face an additional 
challenge during the year of ramping 
up production against the backdrop of 
disruption across the global supply chain 
and, at times, site-specific disruption 
caused by COVID-19. 
The financial performance of the 
individual divisions is summarised in 
table 4. Prior year figures have been 
restated to reflect the transfer of a 
number of product lines from the Energy 
& Equipment division to the Engine 
Systems division with effect from 1 
January 2021. The restatement comprised 
external revenue of £19.7m and 
underlying operating profit of £3.0m. 
Finance costs
Lower underlying net finance costs of 
£28.0m (FY 2020: £31.0m) principally 
reflects currency translation benefits and 
lower overall levels of bank debt during 
the year.
Taxation
The Group’s underlying tax rate for the 
year was 19.3% (FY 2020: 19.7%).
As anticipated, the Group received 
assessments from the UK tax authority in 
2021 following the EU Commission ruling 
that the UK CFC regime constituted 
partial state aid. The assessments 
received amounted to £18.0m and were 
fully covered by provisions held at 31 
December 2020 and have been paid in 
full in 2021. During the year the Group 
has been in dialogue with HMRC and 
continues to appeal against the ruling, 
in parallel with the UK government’s own 
appeal, to the European General Court. 
We understand the European General 
Court is due to issue its judgment in 2022. 
Cash tax decreased in the year and was 
lower than expected at £37.7m (FY 2020: 
£42.1m) largely driven by the geographic 
mix of profits and the phasing of tax 
payments in 2020. Over the next few 
years, we continue to expect the cash tax 
rate to converge with the P&L tax rate as 
historical tax reliefs and allowances come 
to an end and tax relief on certain capital 
expenditure is received over a longer 
time period.
Dividends
In line with the terms of the previously 
announced proposed transaction with 
Parker-Hannifin, the Group is not paying a 
final dividend for 2021.
Investing for the future
During the year, we continued to 
invest in differentiated and sustainable 
technologies to support new product 
development and future growth 
opportunities. Total R&D expenditure for 
the full year of £70.7m which represented 
4.7% of Group revenue was lower than 
the comparative period (FY 2020: £97.9m, 
representing 5.8% of Group revenue) 
reflecting measures taken across the 
Group in 2020 and 2021 to bring R&D 
expenditure back in line with our target 
of ~5% of Group revenue. The charge to 
underlying net operating costs, including 
amortisation and impairment, decreased 
by 6% (increased by 4% on an organic 
basis) to £64.2m (FY 2020: £68.3m). 
Capital expenditure of £69.7m in 2021 
was lower than the prior year (FY 2020: 
£89.7m) and below our guidance of 
around £80m issued in March 2021, 
driven by the re-phasing of a proportion 
of investment in carbon expansion and 
a change in mix between operating and 
capital expenditure on the completion of 
Ansty Park. 
Cash flow and net debt
We continued to maintain a disciplined 
approach to managing our cash during 
the year while continuing to invest in the 
Group and, despite the continuation of 
challenging market conditions, generated 
another year of positive free cash flow of 
£45.7m (FY 2020: £31.9m).
Investment in working capital generated 
an outflow of £48.8m (FY 2020: 
£8.1m inflow) as we responded to 
the anticipated increase in customer 
demand as the civil recovery continued. 
Investment in capital expenditure was 
£69.7m (FY 2020: £89.7m) with the Ansty 
Park and carbon expansion projects 
representing over half of this spend. 
Deficit payments made in respect 
of retirement benefit schemes were 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
44

£42.1m (FY 2020: £21.7m) in line with 
the revised payment schedule agreed 
with the pension trustees following the 
deferral of some deficit contributions to 
the UK scheme in 2020. Cash inflows of 
£36.4m from the disposal of property, 
plant and equipment primarily relates 
to the proceeds generated by the sale 
and leaseback of sites in the US and 
UK as part of our ongoing footprint 
optimisation strategy.
At the end of December 2021, net debt 
of £779.5m (FY 2020: £773.0m) including 
lease liabilities of £169.0m (FY 2020: 
£144.3m), was broadly in line with the 
prior year after taking into account 
adverse currency movements of £27.1m 
and we had ample headroom of £572.6m 
on committed facilities of £1,183.1m.
Debt structure and financing
In November 2021, we extended the 
duration of our debt by refinancing our 
revolving credit facility with a three-year, 
$410m multi-currency facility maturing in 
November 2024 with options to extend 
by another two years. We also reduced 
the size of our three term loans from 
$125m, £100m and £45m, to $50m, £50m 
and £30m respectively, while extending 
some maturities and increasing flexibility 
to further extend, if required. At the year 
end, £30m was drawn under these bank 
facilities and with headroom of £573m on 
committed facilities our liquidity remains 
strong. In 2022, we have one maturity of 
$125m, which represents the final tranche 
of our 2010 private placement notes.
There are two main financial covenants 
in our financing agreements. The net 
debt:EBITDA ratio, which must not 
exceed 3.5x, was at 1.9x at 31 December 
2021 (December 2020: 2.2x) and interest 
cover, which must be not less than 3.0x, 
was 11.3x (December 2020: 9.8x). At the 
end of 2021, the Group had significant 
headroom against both key covenant 
ratios, and net debt:EBITDA was within 
our target range of 1.5x to 2.5x. 
Post-retirement benefit 
schemes
The Group’s principal defined benefit 
schemes are in the UK and US. Following 
completion of a consultation process, the 
UK scheme was closed to future accrual 
with effect from 6 April 2021. All of 
the Group’s US pension schemes have 
previously been closed to future accrual.
Total scheme deficits in 2021 reduced 
to £136.4m (FY 2020: £295.4m), 
Table 6 – Cash flow
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Underlying operating profit
177.3
190.5
Depreciation and amortisation
113.7
106.4
Working capital movements
(48.8)
8.1
Net interest paid
(28.2)
(32.1)
Tax paid
(37.7)
(42.1)
Exceptional operating items paid
(25.9)
(49.3)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and software assets
(69.7)
(89.7)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
36.4
1.3
Capitalised development costs/programme participation costs
(29.3)
(43.0)
Retirement benefit deficit reduction payments
(42.1)
(21.7)
Other
–
3.5
Free cash flow
45.7
31.9
Net proceeds from disposal/acquisition of businesses
11.3
104.2
Issue of equity share capital 
1.3
0.3
Other
0.5
(0.4)
Net cash generated 
58.8
136.0
Lease liabilities entered 
(38.7)
(11.4)
Lease liabilities disposed with businesses 
0.1
5.6
Exchange differences
(27.1)
7.6
Other movements
0.4
0.4
Net debt movements
(6.5)
138.2
Net debt at 1 January
(773.0)
(911.2)
Net debt at 31 December
(779.5)
(773.0)
Table 7 – Post-retirement benefit scheme summary
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Opening net deficit
295.4
267.9
Service cost
6.8
15.2
Group cash contributions
(48.9)
(36.9)
Deficit reduction payments
(42.1)
(21.7)
Other amounts charged to income statement1
(1.6)
8.4
Remeasurement gains – schemes’ assets
(47.4)
(93.5)
Remeasurement (gains)/losses- schemes’ liabilities
(77.3)
136.1
Remeasurement losses – asset ceiling
9.3
–
Currency movements
0.1
(1.8)
Closing net deficit2
136.4
295.4
Liabilities
1,355.1
1,463.9
Less assets
(1,228.0)
(1,168.5)
Add impact of asset ceiling
9.3
–
Closing net deficit2
136.4
295.4
Assets as percentage of liabilities
91%
80%
1	
Comprises past service amounts, administration expenses borne directly by schemes, net interest expense 
and, in 2021, a curtailment gain arising from closure of the UK scheme to future accrual.
2	
Comprises £97.9m (2020: £248.7m) in respect of pension schemes and £38.5m (2020: £46.7m) in respect of US 
healthcare schemes.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
45
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Chief Financial Officer’s review
continued
with the principal drivers of the net 
reduction being:
–	 A reduction of £77.3m (FY 2020: 
increase of £136.1m) relating to 
re-measurement gains on scheme 
liabilities. These principally arise from 
an increase in AA corporate bond 
yields in both the UK and US, reversing 
the trend seen in recent years, which 
more than offset increases in UK 
inflation assumptions;
–	 A reduction of £47.4m (FY 2020: 
reduction of £93.5m) due to re-
measurement gains on scheme 
assets; and
–	 Deficit reduction payments of £42.1m 
(FY 2020: £21.7m) of which £38.0m (FY 
2020: £21.7m) was paid in respect of 
the UK scheme. 
In the UK, the Group continues to 
make deficit payments in accordance 
with a recovery plan agreed with the 
trustees following the 2018 triennial 
funding valuation, amended following 
the four-month deferral of £9.6m of 
deficit contributions originally due to be 
made in 2020. This amended recovery 
plan provides for the 2018 deficit to be 
addressed by payments which gradually 
increase over the period to August 2023. 
Under the plan, the Group will make 
deficit contributions of £40.2m in 2022 
and £29.9m in the period to August 2023. 
The UK 2021 triennial valuation is 
substantially complete and is expected 
to be finalised in H1 2022. The draft 
valuation results indicate an additional 
funding shortfall, not covered by the 
deficit payments being made under 
the existing amended recovery plan, of 
approximately £60.0m. This additional 
shortfall principally arises due to a 
significant reduction in gilt rates between 
the two valuation dates and is equivalent 
to approximately 1.5 years of additional 
deficit contributions, based on the 
annual deficit payments being made 
under the existing 2018 recovery plan. 
Discussions with the trustees to agree 
the timing of contributions to meet the 
additional funding shortfall have not yet 
been concluded.
In the US, the Group made deficit 
payments in respect of its funded defined 
benefit pension schemes of £4.1m (FY 
2020: £1.7m). Under current legislation, 
no further payments are expected to be 
required until 2025. 
Foreign exchange
The Group is exposed to both translation 
and transaction risk due to changes in 
foreign exchange rates. These risks 
principally relate to the US dollar/sterling 
rate, although exposure also exists in 
relation to other currency pairs, principally 
translation risk for the sterling/euro and 
sterling/Swiss franc and transaction risk 
for the US dollar/euro and US dollar/
Swiss franc.
The results of foreign subsidiaries are 
translated into sterling at weighted 
average exchange rates. Over the year 
as a whole, the average sterling rate 
against the US dollar was $1.36 (FY 2020: 
$1.29) providing a negative impact 
on our reported results for the year. 
Compared to 2020, translation of results 
from overseas businesses decreased 
Group revenue by £60.4m and decreased 
underlying profit before tax (PBT) by 
£6.5m in the year.
The sensitivity of full-year revenue 
and underlying PBT to exchange rate 
translation movements against sterling, 
when compared to the 2021 average 
rates, is shown in table 9.
Transaction risk arises where revenues 
and/or costs of our businesses are 
denominated in a currency other than 
their own. We hedge known, and 
some anticipated transaction currency 
exposures, based on historical experience 
Table 8 – Exchange rates 
2021
2020
Average translation rates against Sterling:
US dollar
1.36
1.29
Euro
1.17
1.14
Swiss franc
1.26
1.22
Average transaction rates:
US dollar/sterling
1.36
1.38
US dollar/euro
1.16
1.15
US dollar/Swiss franc
1.13
1.08
Year-end rates against Sterling:
US dollar
1.35
1.37
Euro
1.19
1.11
Swiss franc
1.23
1.20
Table 9 – Translation currency sensitivity
Average
rate
Revenue 
£’m
Underlying 
PBT
£’m
Impact of 10 cent movement*:
US dollar
1.36
75
7
Euro
1.17
7
1
Swiss franc
1.26
6
2
*	
As measured against 2021 actual full-year revenue and underlying PBT.
Table 10 – Transaction hedging
Hedging in 
place1 %
Average 
transaction 
rates
2022:
US dollar/sterling
100
1.34
US dollar/euro
100
1.19
US dollar/Swiss franc
46
1.12
2023 – 2025 inclusive: 
US dollar/sterling
47
1.34
US dollar/euro
32
1.20
US dollar/Swiss franc
–
1.15
1	
Based on forecast transaction exposures, with unhedged exposures based on exchange rates at 31 December 2021.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
46

and projections. Our policy is to hedge 
at least 70% of the next 12 months’ 
anticipated exposure and to permit 
the placing of cover up to five years 
ahead. Compared to 2020, the Group’s 
revenue and underlying profit before tax 
were unfavourably impacted by £11.9m 
and £2.3m respectively by currency 
transaction movements.
Each ten cent movement in the US 
dollar against the average hedge 
rates achieved in 2021 would affect 
underlying PBT by approximately 
£6.0m in respect of US dollar/sterling 
exposure, £2.0m in respect of US dollar/
euro exposure and £2.0m in respect of 
US dollar/Swiss franc exposure. Table 10 
sets out the Group’s transaction hedging 
currently in place.
Taking translation and transaction effects 
into account, the impact of changes 
in foreign exchange rates in FY 2021 
compared with FY 2020 rates was to 
decrease reported revenue by £72.3m 
and underlying PBT by £8.8m.
Debt financing risks
The Group seeks to minimise debt 
financing risk as follows:
a. Concentration of risk
We raise funds through private placement 
issuances and committed bank facilities 
to reduce reliance on any one market. 
Bank financing is sourced from nine 
international institutions spread across 
North America, Europe and Asia. 
No single lender accounts for more 
than 10% of the Group’s total credit 
facilities and the credit rating of lenders 
is monitored by our treasury department. 
The Group’s largest lenders are Bank of 
America, Bank of China, Barclays, BNP 
Paribas, Crédit Industriel et Commercial, 
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation 
and Wells Fargo. We seek to maintain 
at least £100m of undrawn committed 
facilities, net of cash, as a buffer.
b. Set-off arrangements
The Group utilises set-off and netting 
arrangements to reduce the potential 
effect of counterparty defaults. All 
treasury transactions are settled on a net 
basis where possible and surplus cash 
is generally deposited with our lenders 
up to the level of their current exposure 
to us.
c. Refinancing risk
We seek to ensure the maturity of our 
facilities is staggered and any refinancing 
is concluded in good time, typically more 
than 12 months before expiry.
d. Currency risk
To ensure we mitigate headroom erosion 
due to currency movements, over 90% of 
our credit facilities are denominated in US 
dollars, the currency in which the majority 
of our borrowings are held.
e. Covenant risk
Our committed credit facilities contain 
two financial ratio covenants – net debt: 
EBITDA and interest cover. The covenant 
calculations are drafted to protect us from 
potential volatility caused by accounting 
standard changes, sudden movements 
in exchange rates and exceptional items. 
This is achieved by measuring EBITDA 
on a rolling 12-month (30 June and 31 
December) and frozen GAAP basis, 
retranslating net debt and EBITDA at 
similar average exchange rates for the 
year and excluding exceptional items 
from the definition of EBITDA. At 31 
December 2021, we have comfortable 
headroom on both key financial 
covenant measures.
Interest risk
The Group seeks to reduce volatility 
caused by interest rate fluctuations on net 
borrowings. Our US private placements 
are subject to fixed interest rates, 
whereas borrowings under our syndicated 
and bilateral bank credit facilities are at 
floating rates. To manage interest rate 
volatility, we use interest rate derivatives 
to either convert floating rate interest 
into fixed rate or vice versa. Our policy is 
to generally maintain at least 25% of net 
borrowings at fixed rates with a weighted 
average maturity of two years or more. At 
31 December 2021, the percentage of net 
borrowings at fixed rates was 109% (2020: 
108%), and of gross borrowings was 83% 
(2020: 84%) and the weighted average 
period to maturity for the first 25% was 
4.5 years (2020: 6.0 years). A higher 
proportion of debt is held at fixed interest 
rates, than the minimum required under 
our policy, in anticipation of further 
increases in market interest rates.
Non-financial information
Our non-financial information statement is 
contained in the Corporate responsibility 
report on page 88.
Louisa Burdett 
Chief Financial Officer
Table 11 – Net debt by drawn currency (£’m)
2021
2020
Sterling
34.3
39.2
US dollar
778.8
786.3
Euro
(26.3)
(32.4)
Swiss franc
(6.3)
(16.1)
Other
(1.0)
(4.0)
Net debt
779.5
773.0
Table 12 – Covenant ratios
Covenant
2021
2020
Net debt:EBITDA
<3.5x1
1.9x
2.2x
Interest cover
>3.0x
11.3x
9.8x
1 	 A ratio of 4.0x applies in the two six-month reporting periods following a significant acquisition.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
47
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Risk management
Meggitt seeks to operate within a low risk appetite range 
overall. Effective risk management is required to deliver this 
while supporting the achievement of the Group’s strategic 
and business objectives. Our risk management framework 
is based on ISO 31000 and includes a formal process for 
identifying, assessing and responding to risk.
Meggitt’s corporate strategy is designed 
to optimise our business model and 
take risk, with the required controls, 
on an informed basis. See pages 16 to 
17 for a full description of our business 
model and pages 24 to 25 for our 
strategy. To enable value to be created 
for our shareholders, we set varying risk 
tolerances and associated criteria. Risk 
tolerance levels are flowed down to the 
divisions and functions to embed in 
operational processes.
The Board approved an updated 
Group risk appetite statement with 
associated risk tolerances to ensure 
Governance
Responsibility for risk management operates  
at all levels throughout Meggitt:
The Board
The Board takes overall responsibility, determining the nature and extent of the  
principal risks it is willing to take in achieving our strategic objectives, and overseeing 
the Group’s risk governance structure and internal control framework. During 2021, 
the Board carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group, 
including those emerging, that would threaten its business model, future performance, 
solvency or liquidity. This report describes those risks and how they are being 
managed or mitigated.
Audit Committee
The Board has delegated responsibility for reviewing and ensuring the 
effectiveness of the risk management process to the Audit Committee.
Executive Committee
Divisional and functional leadership are responsible for the management 
of risk and for compiling and maintaining their own risk registers,  
which outline risks at business unit and programme levels.
The Executive Committee as a whole regularly reviews the Group’s 
principal risks, while individual members own specific risks.
that identified risks are managed within 
acceptable limits.
The likely timeframe within which the impact 
of these risks might be felt (risk velocity) and 
how we prioritise risks is considered as part 
of our risk management strategy and feeds 
into our assessment of long-term viability. 
Where appropriate, insurance is used to 
manage risks and our risk management 
procedures are shared with our insurers 
when assessing any potential exposures. 
Our insurers have provided funding 
via bursaries to enable more detailed 
reviews of certain risk areas to increase 
understanding of the key drivers and 
indicators which enables more efficient 
action to address these, either through 
mitigation or insurance. These reviews 
have been well received by the risk 
owners for improving their ability to 
monitor and assess their risks and 
by the insurers for providing a more 
detailed analysis of the causes and their 
respective impacts.
Our process
During 2021 we continued to refine our 
risk management approach as a result 
of the ongoing pandemic impacts. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
48

Risk heat map
The heat map below shows the outcome of the risk identification and assessment 
processes used to compile the Group Risk Register. This shows the relative 
likelihood and impact of the principal risks identified. Risks rated as green or  
those with a low expected impact are not considered principal risks of the Group 
for inclusion in the Group Risk Register, although they may feature on divisional  
or functional risk registers and be managed at that level.
 2
1  3  7   
9  10  11
5
12  14
8
4  6  13
Increasing likelihood
Increasing risk impact
Medium
High
Very high
Almost 
certain
Highly 
probable
  
Probable
 Unlikely
Very 
unlikely
We were pleased to note the processes 
described below continued to operate 
on a consistent basis with prior years, 
providing dynamic risk assessments to 
support decision-making for business unit, 
functional and executive management.
Our risk management processes require 
identified risks throughout the Group 
to be owned by a named individual. 
They must review them regularly and 
consider related emerging risks. Risk 
identification is embedded within other 
processes, including strategy, project and 
programme management, bid approvals 
and other operational activities.
Once identified, risks are reviewed at 
a site level and aggregated for review 
at divisional and functional levels on a 
consistent basis, before being submitted 
through the Group’s review process.
The resultant Group Risk Register is subject 
to a detailed review and discussion by 
the Executive Committee which includes 
discussion of risks which may not have been 
identified through the normal channels and 
the interconnectivity of identified risks.
The Board assesses the outputs from this 
process and takes comfort from the “three 
lines of defence” risk assurance model. 
The first line represents operational 
management who own and manage risk 
on a day-to-day basis, utilising effective 
internal controls. Group functions and 
divisions monitor and oversee these 
activities, representing governance and 
compliance at the second line. The third 
line is the independent assurance over 
these activities provided by internal and 
external audits.
Comfort over the management of 
these risks is demonstrated through the 
updated Group risk assurance matrix 
which summarises the assurance activities 
taking place throughout the Group in 
relation to the principal risks.
Strategic risks
Medium to low tolerance for risks 
arising from poor business decisions 
or sub-standard execution of 
business objectives.
1  Business model
2  Industry changes
3  Climate change
Operational risks
Low to near-zero tolerance for risks 
arising from business processes 
including the technical, quality and 
project management or organisational 
risks associated with programmes 
and products.
4  Quality escape/equipment failure
5  Business interruption
6  Project/programme management
7  Customer satisfaction
8  IT/system failure
9  Supply chain
10  Group change management
11  People
Corporate risks
Low to zero tolerance for compliance 
and reputational risks including those 
related to the law and regulations, 
health, safety and the environment.
12  Legal and compliance
Financial risks
Medium to low tolerance for financial 
risks including taxation, pension 
funding, management failure to 
provide adequate liquidity to meet our 
obligations and managing currency, 
interest rate and credit risks.
13  Pension funding
14  Liquidity
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
49
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
The Group’s strategic objectives can 
only be achieved if certain risks are taken 
and managed effectively. We have listed 
below the most significant risks that may 
affect our business, although there may 
be other risks – of which the Group is 
unaware or are considered less significant 
– which may affect our performance. The 
potential impacts of each of our principal 
risks were considered as part of the 
viability stress testing and considered to 
be consistent with, analogous to or less 
significant than the scenarios modelled.
Approach to COVID-19
Given the wide-ranging impact of 
COVID-19 on the aviation industry we 
have continued to assess the effect on 
our existing risks and considered resultant 
emerging risks rather than having a 
single, standalone COVID-19 risk.
Strategic priorities
1  Strategic portfolio
2  Customers
3  Competitiveness
4  Culture
Change in risk
 Increase
y
 No change
 Decrease
Risk velocity
H  High
Impact within 6 months of risk occurring
M  Medium
Impact between 6 and 36 months of risk 
occurring
L  Low
Impact after more than 36 months of risk 
occurring
KPIs
•	 Financial performance (underlying 
operating profit, ROCE, underlying EPS 
growth and free cash flow)
•	 R&D investment
•	 TRIR (total recordable incident rate)
•	 Inventory turns
•	 Emissions intensity
Principal risks & uncertainties
Strategic risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Industry changes
1  
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
Significant variation in demand 
for air travel and/or our products 
due to aerospace and defence 
business downcycles coinciding; 
serious political, economic, 
pandemic (including the ongoing 
impacts of COVID-19) or terrorist 
events; or industry consolidation 
that materially changes the 
competitive landscape.
Volatility in revenue 
and underlying 
profitability.
•	 Demand is managed by monitoring external 
economic and commercial environment and 
long-lead indicators whilst maintaining focus 
on balanced portfolio.
•	 Monitoring international political and tax 
developments to assess implications of 
future legislation.
Business model
2  
y
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 R&D investment
Failure to respond to 
fundamental changes in 
our aerospace business 
model, primarily the evolving 
aftermarket. This includes 
more durable parts requiring 
less frequent replacement, a 
growing supply of surplus parts, 
OE customers seeking greater 
control of their aftermarket 
supply chain and accelerated 
pace of new aircraft deliveries 
leading to the earlier retirement 
of older aircraft.
Decreased revenue 
and profit.
•	 Alignment of Group, divisional and functional 
strategy processes.
•	 Dedicated full-service aftermarket 
organisation.
•	 Long-term customer agreements including 
SMARTSupport™ packages to create 
tailored solutions for customers throughout 
the product lifecycle enabling more effective 
performance monitoring and more 
predictable pricing.
•	 Investment in research and development 
to maintain and enhance Meggitt’s 
intellectual property.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
50

Strategic risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Climate change
3  
y
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 R&D investment
•	 Emissions intensity
Failure to adapt to the transition 
and physical impacts of climate 
change, including:
•	 government legislation to limit 
air travel;
•	 regulations limiting 
greenhouse gas emissions 
from aviation come into effect 
faster than technical solutions;
•	 societal attitudes shifting 
against air travel (e.g. “flight 
shaming”);
•	 acute physical risks such as the 
increased likelihood of 
extreme weather events; and
•	 chronic physical risks such as 
changing weather patterns 
including rising temperatures 
and sea levels.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 Continued dialogue with governments, 
industry bodies and customers to maintain 
awareness of evolving aviation sector 
requirements.
•	 Continued focus on developing technologies 
to support sustainable aviation and on 
reducing the carbon intensity of our 
production operations.
•	 Allocation of two-thirds of innovation budget 
to sustainable solutions.
•	 Reduction in Group carbon footprint through 
new facilities, more efficient production 
processes and using green energy sources.
•	 Comprehensive business continuity plans 
across the Group, supported by an insurance 
programme subject to annual renewal.
•	 Long-term weather considerations as part of 
site footprint strategy.
•	 These are considered further as part of the 
TCFD disclosures on pages 58 to 63.
Operational risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Quality escape/
equipment failure
3  
y
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
Defective product leading to 
in-service failure, accidents, 
the grounding of aircraft or 
prolonged production shut- 
downs for the Group and 
its customers.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 System safety analysis, verification and 
validation policy and processes, combined 
with quality and customer audits and 
industry certifications.
•	 HPS implementation and maturity.
•	 Supplier quality assurance process.
Business interruption
3  
y
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 R&D investment
A catastrophic event such as 
natural disasters (including 
earthquake – the Group has a 
significant operational presence 
in Southern California); civil 
unrest, military conflict or 
terrorist activity; or a pandemic 
(including further impacts 
from COVID-19) could lead to 
infrastructure disruption and/or 
property damage which prevents 
the Group from fulfilling its 
contractual obligations.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 Group-wide business continuity and crisis 
management plans, subject to regular testing 
and updated for lessons learned. These were 
also invoked during 2021 in response to 
COVID-19.
•	 Comprehensive insurance programme, 
renewed annually and subject to property 
risk assessment visits.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
51
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Principal risks & uncertainties
continued
Operational risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Project/programme 
management
3  
y
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 R&D investment
Failure to meet new product 
development programme 
milestones and certification 
requirements and successfully 
transition new products into 
manufacturing as production 
rates increase. This also covers 
lower than expected production 
volumes, including programme 
cancellations or delays.
Failure to deliver 
financial returns 
against investment 
and/or significant 
financial penalties 
leading to decreased 
profit and damage 
to reputation.
•	 Rigorous commercial and technological 
reviews of bids and contractual terms before 
entering into programmes.
•	 Continuous review of programme 
performance through the Programme 
Lifecycle Management (PLM) process 
including:
–	 regular monitoring of the end-market 
performance of key OE programmes;
–	 internal review process, to stress-test 
readiness to proceed at each stage of key 
programmes; and
–	 regular monitoring of the financial health 
of customers.
Customer 
satisfaction
2  
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 Inventory turns
Failure to meet customers’ cost, 
quality and delivery standards or 
qualify as preferred suppliers.
Failure to win future 
programmes resulting 
in decreased revenue 
and profit.
•	 Creation of a customer-facing organisational 
structure including a dedicated aftermarket 
division.
•	 Regular monitoring of customer scorecards 
and ensuring responsiveness to issues via 
Voice of the Customer process.
•	 Functional excellence in operations, project 
management and engineering.
•	 Increased utilisation of low-cost 
manufacturing base.
IT/Systems failure
1  
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
A breach of IT security due to 
increasingly more sophisticated 
cyber crime/terrorism resulting 
in intellectual property or other 
sensitive information being lost, 
made inaccessible, corrupted 
or accessed by unauthorised 
users. This also includes the 
loss of critical systems such as 
SAP due to poorly executed 
implementation or change of 
control; poor maintenance, 
business continuity or back-up 
procedures and the failure of 
third parties to meet service 
level agreements.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 Information Security infrastructure, policies 
and procedures supported by a Group-wide 
security awareness programme.
•	 Intelligence sharing on threats with 
government and security bodies including 
the FBI, CPNI and NCSC.
•	 Management of third-party service providers 
and risks, including resilience and disaster 
recovery processes.
•	 Rolling programme of system upgrades 
(including SAP implementation) to replace 
legacy systems.
•	 Defined vulnerability management policy 
with monitoring capability to ensure that 
vulnerabilities are identified and 
appropriately patched.
•	 Dedicated cyber-security protective 
monitoring resources, employing industry-
leading technical controls and procedures.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
52

Operational risks continued
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Supply chain
1  
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 Inventory turns
Failure or inability of critical 
suppliers to supply unique 
products, capabilities or services 
preventing the Group from 
satisfying customers or meeting 
contractual requirements.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 Dynamic supplier risk assessment process 
leveraging our data and using leading 
indicators to help identify risks and trigger 
containment and corrective actions.
•	 Local sourcing strategy to improve operational 
efficiency and minimise potential impacts 
and disruption from cross-border tariffs.
•	 Enhanced approach to supplier excellence 
by supporting supplier audit activities.
•	 Improved supplier engagement on delivery 
performance including the placing of 
longer-term commitments, buffer stock 
arrangements and issuing of performance 
“report cards” to key suppliers.
Group change 
management
3  
y
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 Inventory turns
Failure to successfully, 
simultaneously, deliver the 
significant change programmes 
currently in process and planned, 
including site consolidation 
activity such as Ansty Park and 
investments in new carbon 
manufacturing facilities in 
the USA.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, increased 
costs, damage 
to operational 
performance 
and reputation.
•	 PMO oversight of large capital projects.
•	 Dedicated site consolidation and property 
management teams for significant 
transition projects.
•	 Regular monitoring by Executive Committee 
through operational and project reviews.
•	 HPS implementation at new/expanded sites.
People
4  
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 Inventory turns
Failure to attract, retain or 
mobilise people due to factors 
including industrial action, 
workforce demographics, lack of 
training, availability of talent and 
inadequate compensation.
Decreased revenue 
and profit, damage 
to operational 
performance.
•	 Embedding of High Performance Culture.
•	 Action plans to improve employee 
engagement.
•	 Graduate and apprentice programmes in 
partnership with schools and universities.
•	 Regular oversight by Executive Committee.
•	 Creation of Employee Resource Groups to 
foster diversity, boost employee engagement 
and enable global collaboration.
•	 Talent attraction and retention strategies 
focusing on local market competitiveness 
and career development frameworks.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
53
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Principal risks & uncertainties
continued
Corporate risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Legal and 
compliance
3  
y
 H
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
•	 TRIR
Significant breach of increasingly 
complex trade compliance, 
bribery and corruption, USG 
contracting, ethics, intellectual 
property, data protection, 
competition/anti-trust laws, 
facilitation of tax evasion and 
the market abuse regime.
Damage to reputation, 
loss of supplier 
accreditations, 
suspension of activity, 
fines from civil and 
criminal proceedings.
•	 Continuing investment in compliance 
programmes including Board-approved 
policies and rollout of training and 
IT solutions.
•	 Regular monitoring of ethics and anti-bribery 
programme by Corporate Responsibility 
Committee.
•	 Ongoing trade compliance programme 
including third-party audits.
•	 Comprehensive ethics programme including 
training, anti-corruption policy and “Speak 
Up” Line.
•	 Third-party and internal audits including 
HS&E and Anti-Bribery & Corruption.
•	 HPS implementation to enhance safety 
measures, validated by third-party audits.
Financial risks
Risk
Description
Impact
How we manage it
Pension funding
3  
y
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
The Group operates defined 
benefit pensions schemes in 
the UK, US and Switzerland. The 
level of deficits in these schemes 
may be affected adversely by 
investment returns, interest 
rates, increasing life expectancy 
and changes in the regulatory 
environment. The rates at which 
deficits are funded is subject 
to agreement with the trustees 
in the UK and is dependent 
on legislation in the US and 
Switzerland.
Higher pension 
scheme funding 
contributions resulting 
in decreased cash 
and profit.
•	 Triennial valuation process and deficit 
funding agreement with UK Pension Trustees.
•	 Continued monitoring of asset allocations 
and funding levels for all schemes.
•	 Closure of UK and US defined benefit 
schemes to future accrual.
Liquidity
3  
 M
KPIs:
•	 Financial performance
Financial risk management is 
considered in detail on pages 
188 to 189.
Inability to access 
financing on normal 
commercial terms.
•	 Maintaining sufficient headroom in 
committed credit facilities and against 
covenants in those facilities.
•	 Arranging funding with maturities spread 
over several years or the ability to terminate 
early at little or no cost to the Group.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
54

Oversight of risk and 
internal control
The Board is responsible for risk 
management and internal control and for 
maintaining and reviewing its financial 
and operational effectiveness. The Board 
has taken into account the guidance 
provided by the FRC on risk management 
and internal control in carrying out its 
duties. The system of internal control 
is designed to manage, but not to 
eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve 
business objectives and to provide 
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance 
against material misstatement or loss.
The Group’s functions are responsible 
for determining Group policies 
and processes. The businesses are 
responsible for implementing them, 
with internal and/or external audits to 
confirm business unit compliance. The 
key features of the risk management and 
internal control system are described 
below, including those relating to the 
financial reporting process, as required 
under the Disclosure Guidance and 
Transparency Rules (DGTR):
•	 Group policies – key policies are 
approved by the Board and other 
policies are approved by Group 
functions;
•	 process controls – for example 
financial controls including the Group 
Finance Policies and Procedures 
Manual, the bid approval process, 
programme lifecycle management 
reviews, IT security framework and risk 
management; and
•	 the forecasting, budget and strategic 
plan processes.
The Group’s programmes for insurance 
and business continuity form part of our 
risk management and internal control 
framework. 
The following features allow the Group 
to monitor the effective implementation 
of policies and process controls by 
business units:
•	 a business performance review process 
(including financial, operational and 
compliance performance);
•	 semi-annual business unit, product 
group and divisional sign-off of 
compliance with Group policies 
and processes;
•	 compliance programmes and external 
audits (including trade compliance, 
ethics, anti-corruption, health, safety 
and environmental);
•	 an effective internal audit function 
which, primarily, performs business unit 
reviews by rotation (including finance, 
programme management, IT, HR, 
ethics, anti-bribery & corruption and 
business continuity); and
•	 a whistleblowing line to enable 
employees to raise concerns.
To review the effectiveness of the 
system of internal controls, the Board 
and Audit Committee applied the 
following processes and activities in 2021 
and up to the date of approval of the 
Annual Report:
•	 reviews of the risk management 
process, risk register and risk appetite 
statement;
•	 written and verbal reports to the Audit 
Committee from internal and external 
audit on progress with internal control 
activities, including:
–	 Reviews of business processes and 
activities, including action plans 
to address any identified control 
weaknesses and recommendations 
for improvements to controls or 
processes;
–	 The results of internal audits;
–	 Internal control recommendations 
made by the external auditors; and
–	 Follow-up actions from previous 
internal control recommendations.
•	 regular compliance reports from the 
Group General Counsel and Director, 
Corporate Affairs;
•	 regular reports on the state of the 
business from the Chief Executive and 
Chief Financial Officer;
•	 presentation on IT security activities 
and plans from the Chief Information 
Officer and the Chief Information 
Security Officer;
•	 strategy reviews, review of the five-year 
financial plan and review and approval 
of the 2022 budget;
•	 written reports to the Corporate 
Responsibility Committee on the 
effectiveness and outcomes of 
whistleblowing procedures; and
•	 reports on insurance coverage and 
uninsured risks.
The risk management and internal 
control systems have been in place for 
the year under review and up to the date 
of approval of the Annual Report, and 
are regularly reviewed by the Board. The 
Board monitors executive management’s 
action plans to implement improvements 
in internal controls that have been 
identified following the above mentioned 
reviews and reports. The Board confirms 
that it has not identified any significant 
failings or weaknesses in the Group’s 
systems of risk management or internal 
control as a result of information provided 
to the Board and resulting discussions.
Viability statement
In accordance with the provision 31 of the 
2018 Code, as part of their assessment of 
the Group’s viability, the Directors have 
assessed the prospects of the Group and 
its ability to meet its liabilities as they 
fall due.
Response to COVID-19 and 
impact on Meggitt’s viability
During 2020, in response to the 
COVID-19 pandemic, the Group 
executed a material reduction in its 
structural cost base and held net debt 
below £800m (December 2020: £773m). 
The covenant ratio was 2.2x. The Group 
secured a forward start on its RCF for 
one year on $575m to September 2022 
and issued $300m on an oversubscribed 
private placement in November 2020. 
The anticipated recovery in the civil 
aerospace aftermarket has been slower 
to materialise than was anticipated 12 
months ago, extending the pressure 
on profitability and therefore covenants 
through 2021. Continued close 
management of the Group’s cash position 
and a focus on delivery through H1 2021 
saw the Group’s covenant rise modestly 
to 2.4x by June 2021 after more than 
12 months of the pandemic, whilst also 
protecting the business from further 
significant cost reduction in anticipation 
of a market recovery. Through H2 2021, 
there was a focus on continuing to 
refinance debt, with the Group closing a 
new $410m RCF facility in Q4, alongside a 
number of revisions to bilateral facilities. 
By the end of 2021, the Group had 
materially extended its maturity profile 
and resized its gross debt burden, whilst 
also delivering its strongest six months 
of profit generation since the start of 
the pandemic.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
55
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Principal risks & uncertainties
continued
By the end of 2021, the Group’s covenant 
ratio has fallen to 1.9x with net debt at 
£779.5m. With increased volumes of AM 
orders now being placed, though the 
COVID pandemic is not over, the Group’s 
financial and debt position continues to 
improve, moderating the threat posed to 
its viability by COVID. 
Climate change
Meggitt explicitly monitors the impact 
of climate change on the Group as part 
of its risk register. Meggitt has potential 
exposures both on the demand side 
(primarily transition risks) should flight 
volumes be impacted by changes in the 
tax regime or consumer flying habits 
be moderated. In addition, there are 
a number of supply side challenges 
(primarily physical risks) from issues such 
as extreme weather.
Whilst the Group does consider that it 
has potentially material exposure to the 
impact of climate change, the magnitude 
of that impact within the current viability 
assessment period is likely to be lower 
than for some of the other risks faced 
by the Group. Therefore, though it is 
monitored, it is not formally part of this 
viability assessment, given the magnitude 
of the potential impacts from other risks. 
Assessment of prospects
The Board believes that, despite the 
impact of COVID-19 over the last years, 
the prospects for both the aerospace 
market and for the Group within it 
continue to be favourable in the medium 
to long term: 
•	 We believe that the desire for 
individuals to travel and to connect 
with others remains and that air travel 
will play a critical part in meeting 
that demand;
•	 Growth in civil aerospace markets is 
returning; Meggitt provides equipment 
to all major new platforms entering 
service in the near future; 
•	 Meggitt has an installed base of over 
73,000 in service aircraft, and with an 
average aircraft lifespan of 25 years, 
our aftermarket will be providing 
meaningful revenues to the Group well 
into the future;
•	 We are diversified by end market and 
by customer; 
•	 We supply into both civil (46% revenue) 
and defence (42%) aircraft markets, and 
into selected energy markets (9%); 
•	 Our revenues are split broadly 
evenly between equipment sales 
and aftermarket; 
•	 We work with a diverse group of 
customers from across the globe. Our 
top ten customers generate 45% of 
our revenue;
•	 We invest for the long term and protect 
our know-how; 
•	 We invest in market-leading 
technology. We continue to target 
spending, on average, 5-7% of revenue 
on R&D through the cycle; 
•	 We grow, manage and defend our 
intellectual property portfolio robustly; 
•	 We continue to invest in next 
generation technologies to support 
a sustainable future for aviation and 
power generation; 
•	 We seek to attract and retain 
colleagues who can enable 
the extraordinary; 
•	 We manufacture based on quality, 
consistency and value; 
•	 We manage our manufacturing facilities 
using HPS, a tiered improvement 
programme, providing a roadmap to 
best-in-class manufacturing; 
•	 We operate a globally distributed 
manufacturing infrastructure, producing 
both in the OECD and in lower 
cost locations; 
•	 We continue to have robust liquidity 
and a strong financial base; 
•	 The Group has reduced its levels of 
debt over the last two years to £779.5m 
in spite of the pressures from COVID. 
The Group generated free cash flow in 
both 2020 and 2021;
•	 Our gearing ratio at the end of 2021 
was 1.9x (net debt/EBITDA) and 
interest cover was 11.3x, both well 
within our covenant limits; and
•	 We have just under £1.2bn of 
committed facilities as at 31 December 
2021, and a headroom of £573m.
Assessment period
The Board considered the Group’s 
principal risks as detailed in our risk 
register, and assessed the impact, 
likelihood and timeframe over which the 
risks might crystallise. It also considered 
over what timeframe certain business and 
sector changes currently impacting the 
Group would likely be resolved.
1. Market recovery: Industry observers 
continue to see a recovery in the civil 
aerospace market. The Group expects 
revenue to recover to 2019 levels by 
2024-25.
2. Meggitt evolution: The Group has a 
number of material projects, including 
the completion of the move into Ansty 
Park and other footprint reduction 
efforts, for which the benefits are 
expected to accrue to Meggitt within 
the next five years. 
3. Programme investment: The Group 
typically expects the investment 
cycle of five years for engineering 
development programmes. 
4. Refinancing: The Group’s existing debt 
base will typically be fully refinanced 
over a five-year period. 
Given the above, and the long cycle 
nature of the Company’s activities, the 
Board concluded that five years continues 
to be the correct timeframe over which to 
assess viability and risk impact.
Assessment of viability and risk 
stress tests
The Group continues to model a 
progressive recovery in activity in the 
civil aerospace market on the back of 
encouraging market data seen in late 
2021. A number of outcomes continue 
to be possible regarding COVID-19, 
but the Group continues to believe 
that a full recovery in civil aerospace 
activity is likely to be by 2023-24. It is 
against this recovery baseline that the 
Group’s viability has been tested using 
two scenarios against the output of 
the Group’s annual long-term planning 
process. More detail on the base 
performance case can be seen in Note 1 
of the consolidated financial statements. 
1. Loss of a major customer
Other than with the profound ongoing 
demand shock precipitated by COVID, 
we test the scenario in which the Group 
faces potential major customer loss risk. 
The aviation sector is reliant on a well-
developed system of global regulations 
and equipment qualifications. Security 
of data is also critical when working 
with both the private sector and with 
governments. The Group has modelled 
the impact of a significant loss of revenue 
following a regulatory or compliance 
failure at Meggitt. Censure for non-
compliance can be severe, whether 
through fines or fleet grounding. This 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
56

scenario is modelled to unfold in parallel 
with the recovery from COVID-19 but 
over a 12-month period given the time 
taken for customers to resource, which 
allows the civil AM recovery to be well 
underway in the underlying base case. 
2. Major business disruption event
We model a supply-side shock, such as 
manufacturing disruption in California 
as a result of a natural disaster. Business 
disruption continues to be one of the 
highest impacting risks on the Group’s 
financial performance, both around the 
impact on major customers and suppliers. 
Given the concentration of aerospace 
assets in California, a natural disaster 
here would have a significant impact. 
As modelled, such a disaster takes two 
years to rebuild from, and with material 
production losses. 
The Group has modelled the financial 
impact of the risks articulated above, 
together with mitigating actions. 
Mitigating actions include a reduction 
in investment both in PP&E and R&D 
or curtailment of indirect expenditure 
and headcount reduction. Levers such 
as extended dividend suspension or 
material reduction in discretionary spend 
would also be open beyond current 
COVID horizons. As in 2020, the Group 
would find it challenging should a second 
external shock occur before the recovery 
from COVID-19 is well established. 
However, particularly given the recent 
strong data on AM orders, the Group 
continues to believe that both the scale 
of losses and of mitigating levers would 
mean there was limited impact on the 
Group’s viability.
Statement of viability
Based on the results of the analysis, the 
Board has a reasonable expectation that 
the Group will continue in operation 
and be able to meet its liabilities as 
they fall due over the five-year period 
of assessment.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
57
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Taskforce on Climate-related  
Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Recommendation
Recommended disclosure
Further detail 
available
Current status
Future priorities
1) Governance
a) Describe the Board’s oversight of climate 
related risks and opportunities
Section 
1 below
 
•	 Climate change and 
environmental sustainability is 
a major consideration of our 
business at all levels.
•	 Climate related risks and 
opportunities are integrated 
into our strategy and 
business model.
•	 All Board and management 
committees review risks and 
opportunities as part of their 
areas of responsibility.
•	 Sustainability strategy will 
continue to be reviewed 
by the Board on an 
annual basis. 
•	 Any future Board 
appointments will take 
into consideration climate 
change/sustainability skills 
and experience.
•	 Increased linkages between 
sustainability performance 
and LTIP/Remuneration 
Committee considerations.
b) Describe management’s role in assessing 
and managing climate related risks and 
opportunities
Section 
1 below
2) Strategy
a) Describe the climate-related risks and 
opportunities the organisation has 
identified over the short, medium and 
long term
Section 
2 below
 
•	 Climate related risk and 
opportunities have been 
considered in the overall 
strategic plan over three 
timeframes, <3 years, 3-10 
years and >10 years.
•	 Strategic planning is integrated 
into financial planning.
•	 Greater level of scenario 
modelling within the 
review cycle.
•	 Continued commitments 
on research and technology 
investment into sustainable 
technologies.
•	 Setting of science-based 
targets and confirming 
a clearly defined path to 
reduce emissions.
b) Describe the impact of climate 
related risks and opportunities on the 
organisation’s businesses, strategy and 
financial planning
Section 
2 below
c) Describe the resilience of the 
organisation’s strategy, taking into 
consideration different climate related 
scenarios, including a 2C or lower scenario
Section 
2 below
3) Risk 
Management
a) Describe the organisation’s processes for 
identifying and assessing climate related 
risks
Principal Risks 
section and 
section 3 below 
•	 ISO 31000 aligned risk 
management framework 
incorporating climate-
related risk.
•	 Climate change is viewed as 
a principal strategic risk which 
is continually reviewed across 
the business.
•	 Transition and physical 
risks are evaluated through 
demand side and supply side 
scenario planning.
•	 Continued development of 
risk assessment processes 
to better identify emerging 
climate related risks.
•	 Greater scenario planning 
incorporating climate 
related risks.
b) Describe the organisation’s processes for 
managing climate related risks
Principal Risks 
section and 
section 3 below
c) Describe how processes for identifying, 
assessing and managing climate related 
risks are integrated into the organisation’s 
overall risk management
Principal Risks 
section and 
section 3 below
4) Metrics & 
Targets
a) Disclose the metrics used by the 
organisation to assess climate related risks 
and opportunities in line with its strategy 
and risk management process
Section 
4 below
•	 GHG emissions have been 
reported since 2017 against a 
target to reduce GHG by 50% 
(relative to revenue) against the 
2016 baseline.
•	 Market and location based 
reporting is including in the 
reporting regime.
•	 Disclosure of Scope 3 emissions 
are in the planning and initial 
screening phase.
•	 Set internal site targets to drive 
a reduction in emissions.
•	 Scope 1 & 2 reduction measures 
incorporated into LTIP.
•	 Complete and disclose 
material scope 3 categories.
•	 Implement an internal 
carbon price to ensure 
cost of climate impact (all 
scopes) is embedded in 
business decisions – e.g. 
capital expenditure within 
our facilities.
•	 Lay out a roadmap to 
achieve science based 
targets, e.g. through 
substitution of fossil-
fuel fired processes and 
facilities and procurement 
of renewable energy.
b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and if 
appropriate Scope 3 greenhouse gas 
(GHG) emissions, and the related risks
Section 4 below 
and Planet 
section of CR 
report (page 82)
c) Describe the targets used by the 
organisation to manage climate related 
risks and opportunities and performance 
against these targets
Section 
4 below
We adopted TCFD reporting early in 
2020 and have developed our reporting 
process during 2021 towards compliance 
with the disclosure requirements from 
2021 onwards. 
Many of the TCFD requirements were 
already integrated into our strategy, 
operations and culture and we have 
strengthened our reporting in this Annual 
Report to provide additional disclosures 
in key areas. 
As per Listing Rule 9.8.6(8)R, Meggitt 
has adopted climate-related financial 
disclosures consistent with the TCFD 
recommendations and recommended 
disclosures with the exception of Scope 
3 data disclosure and improvements 
planned for 2022 as detailed below. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
58

Integrating Meggitt reporting 
into the TCFD framework:
Risk  
Management
Metrics  
& Targets
Strategy
Governance
The Board of Directors is ultimately 
responsible for developing the Group’s 
strategy on climate change and 
overseeing our progress in this area. 
Day-to-day responsibility is delegated 
to the Chief Executive, supported by the 
Executive Committee. Below that there 
are employee working groups working 
on specific projects, overseen by the 
Environmental Steering Committee. 
1) Governance 
Climate change, with the associated risks 
and opportunities, has been identified by 
the Board and Executive Committee as a 
key strategic issue and is an integral part 
of our business planning framework. Our 
strategy includes how we can position the 
business to offer products that will enable 
the shift to sustainable aviation and low-
carbon energy production, how we can 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions from 
our operations, and how we can ensure 
our facilities are resilient in the face of a 
changing climate.
Summary of responsibilities Board 
The Board is responsible for the Group’s 
strategy on climate change, including 
oversight of climate-related risks and 
opportunities impacting the Group. 
At a strategic level, the Board considers 
the impacts of climate change on both 
our markets and our operations. 
The Board continually monitors our 
performance and progress in these 
areas, receiving regular updates on 
international policies to decarbonise the 
aviation sector, including market-based 
measures, technological solutions and 
demand management. The Board takes 
these factors into consideration when 
setting the Group’s policies and strategy. 
The Board approves the Corporate 
Responsibility & Sustainability Policy 
and the Environmental Policy that sets 
out the Group’s commitment to running 
a sustainable business. These policies, 
which are available on our website, are 
reviewed by the Board on a regular 
basis to ensure they are appropriate and 
up to date. 
There has been an increased focus on 
climate-related matters as the landscape 
continues to evolve with further 
regulatory developments and changes 
in stakeholder expectations. A summary 
of the primary climate change-related 
activities undertaken by the Board 
throughout 2021 and into 2022 are set 
out below:
1.	 Reviewed and approved an updated 
Environmental Policy;
2.	 Reviewed the performance on our 
environmental sustainability metrics 
and targets;
3.	 Reviewed and approved risk appetite 
including appetite in respect of 
climate change risk;
4.	 Reviewed and approved the Group 
Risk Register to monitor Group 
risks and how they are mitigated, 
including climate change risk;
5.	 Received regular updates on climate 
change risk and opportunities 
from the Chief Executive, Group 
Operations Director and Group 
Director Engineering and Strategy;
6.	 Considered climate change risk and 
opportunities when reviewing and 
approving our strategic plan;
7.	 Received an update on the Group’s 
sustainability strategy; and
8.	 Received an update on technology 
with a primary focus on sustainable 
aviation.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible 
for reviewing the content of the ARA, 
including the TCFD disclosures, and 
advising the Board if the ARA as a whole 
is fair, balanced and understandable. 
The Committee is also responsible for 
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness 
of the Group’s risk management 
processes including those relating to 
climate change risk and the processes 
to determine the Group’s overall risk 
appetite, tolerance and strategy, and 
advises the Board on the appropriateness 
of those processes.
During the year the Committee discussed 
the Group’s natural catastrophe business 
interruption risk, including climate 
related weather events using scenario 
analysis to look at emerging risks, 
common underlying drivers and potential 
mitigating actions. The Committee 
discussed severe climate-related weather 
events, sought clarification on mitigating 
actions and a report will be provided to 
the Board on climate-related risk to our 
operations in 2022.
Corporate Responsibility Committee 
The Corporate Responsibility (CR) 
Committee has independent oversight 
of the implementation of the Group’s 
environmental performance and receives 
regular updates on environmental KPIs, 
environmental audits.
The Corporate Responsibility Committee 
reviews environmental reports twice 
a year.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee is 
responsible for setting the Group’s 
remuneration policy, including how ESG 
factors are considered when determining 
executive pay. 
In 2021, the Committee considered the 
increasing importance of ESG-related 
factors and agreed to incorporate a 
new sustainability measure into the LTIP. 
The 2021 goal is to direct two-thirds 
of Meggitt’s research and technology 
expenditure towards developing 
sustainable technology. In this context 
“sustainable technologies” are those 
that will enable customers to operate 
with lower greenhouse gas emissions and 
more efficiently. Strategic measures under 
the short-term incentive plan for the 
Chief Executive also include sustainability 
goals. The Committee further considered 
ESG measures when looking at 2022 plan 
measures and has incorporated a new 
strategic measure on carbon emission 
reduction (more detail can be found in 
the Directors’ remuneration report on 
page 126).
The Committee is satisfied that the 
current and proposed incentive structures 
for senior executives do not raise 
ESG risks by inadvertently motivating 
irresponsible behaviour.
The Remuneration Committee reviews 
performance updates for the LTIP, 
including ESG measures, three times 
a year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
59
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Nominations Committee
The Nominations Committee ensures 
the Board and senior management team 
have the appropriate skills, knowledge 
and experience to operate effectively and 
to deliver the Group’s strategy.
In 2021, climate change/sustainability 
expertise was added to our skills matrix.
Management level
Finance Committee
The Finance Committee has delegated 
responsibility to approve investments and 
certain corporate activities up to amounts 
determined by the Board. 
The Committee considers climate-related 
risks and opportunities relating to proposals 
submitted for approval. 
CEO
The Chief Executive Officer is the 
designated owner of the Group’s climate 
change risk and is ultimately responsible 
for managing the risk across the business. 
Executive submit regular reports to the 
Board on the Group’s climate change- 
related risks and opportunities.
Executive Committee 
The Executive Committee leads 
the consistent implementation of 
business and operational processes to 
minimise the impact of the Group on 
the environment and sets targets for 
improving the Group’s environmental 
performance. Functional responsibility 
is delegated to the Group Director 
of Engineering & Strategy (for our 
response from a technology and 
market perspective) and to our Group 
Operations Director (for our response 
from an operational perspective). 
Divisions, product groups and sites 
Our divisions, product groups and 
sites are responsible for day-to-day 
performance in these areas. Each 
site is required to drive a number of 
projects locally to support the reduction 
of carbon emissions, electricity and 
water consumption, and landfill wastes 
disposals. Targets have been deployed 
at each site and will be tracked as part of 
the overall Strategy Deployment Process 
at site and product group level. 
Environmental Steering  
Committee (ESC)
The ESC, comprised of the Group 
Company Secretary, Group Director, 
Engineering & Strategy, and Group 
Operations Director deploys the Group’s 
strategy into the business by providing 
direction to the Environmental Working 
Group on key business plans, such as 
the procurement of clean electricity and 
deployment of site targets. 
Group Director, Sustainability
The Group Director, Sustainability 
was appointed in 2021 (reporting to 
the Group Operations Director) and 
is driving Meggitt’s environmental 
sustainability programme of change – 
defining our increased ambition, and 
launching projects directly reducing 
our impact, as well as change initiatives 
designed to embed progressively 
sustainable considerations into our core 
operating model.
Environmental Senior Forum 
Environmental Senior Forum includes 
senior stakeholders and project sponsors 
from Finance, Operations, Procurement, 
Communications, Research and 
Technology, Corporate Responsibility and 
Facilities Management, reporting to the 
ESC for strategic guidance.
2) Strategy
Overview of climate-related risks 
and opportunities
Given the scale and immediacy of the 
climate change challenge, the changing 
expectations of our key stakeholders 
present both risks and opportunities to 
our business. A summary of these risks 
and opportunities are presented in the 
following table, as a complement and 
expansion of the overall climate change 
risk detailed on page 51. Potential impact 
and mitigation of these risks are outlined 
in the table at the bottom of page 62.
Taskforce on Climate-related  
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
60

Short term (<3 yrs)
Medium term (3-10 yrs)
Long term (> 10yrs)
Opportunities
Risks
Opportunities
Risks
Opportunities
Risks
Aerospace 
markets
Increased utilisation 
of more modern 
and fuel-efficient 
aircraft where 
Meggitt has a 
higher ship-set 
content leading 
to increased sales 
of both original 
equipment and 
aftermarket 
services.
Early reduced 
demand for air 
travel, driven by 
evolving passenger 
preference, or 
increased prices 
due to further 
regulatory changes 
(e.g. more 
onerous CORSIA 
requirements).
Upgrades of 
existing aircraft 
designs and launch 
of new platforms 
to improve fuel 
efficiency where 
Meggitt’s thermal, 
sensing, composite, 
electrical and 
flow control 
technologies are 
well suited.
Material reduced 
demand for air 
travel, driven by 
evolving passenger 
preferences, or 
increased prices 
due to regulatory 
changes (e.g. 
introduction of 
carbon taxes, 
increase in fuel 
costs due to SAF 
mandates).
Continued demand 
for Meggitt 
technologies to 
enable highly 
efficient aircraft 
powered by SAF 
and the emergence 
of hydrogen- 
powered aircraft.
Sustainable 
aviation technology 
transition is 
not sufficiently 
rapid to alleviate 
environmental 
concerns and 
mitigate additional 
regulatory costs, 
further reducing 
demand for air 
travel.
Energy 
markets
Accelerating 
demand for energy 
efficiency, natural 
gas and energy 
storage driving 
strong demand 
for Meggitt’s 
industrial heat 
exchangers and 
gas-turbine control 
technologies.
Initial assessment of 
risks in this market 
segment is limited 
given Meggitt’s 
exposure to both 
natural gas and 
renewable energy 
markets.
Further accelerating 
demand for low-
carbon energy 
drive further 
increased demand 
for Meggitt’s key 
clean energy 
technologies.
Early, meaningful 
transition away 
from natural gas 
reduces demand for 
equipment in this 
part of the market.
Increased demand 
for energy 
efficiency and 
storage, hydrogen, 
carbon capture, 
offers significant 
opportunities 
for our heat 
exchangers and 
thermal systems 
capabilities.
Long-term trends 
away from fossil 
fuels reduces 
demand for 
equipment in this 
part of the market.
Production 
operations
Substitution of 
gas-fired processes, 
modernising 
our facilities and 
improvement 
of production 
processes all reduce 
Scope 1and 2 
emissions.
Engagement 
with suppliers 
on low-carbon 
expectations in 
purchased goods 
and services.
Increased input 
costs due to 
energy prices and 
incremental cost of 
renewable energy.
Move to renewable 
electricity through 
mix of on-site/
off-site generation, 
provide long-
term price 
stability/security 
e.g. through 
Power Purchase 
Agreements. 
Smaller number of 
larger and more 
efficient global 
plants.
Further reductions 
in embedded 
carbon in material 
inputs through 
collaboration with 
suppliers to reduce 
emissions and 
increase yields.
Increased input 
costs due to carbon 
taxes and higher 
cost of low-carbon 
raw materials and 
services.
Additional capex 
required to 
substitute fossil fuel 
fired processes to 
meet internal GHG 
reduction targets.
Physical disruption 
to Meggitt facilities 
and supply chains.
Sub-optimised 
capacity due 
to changes in 
demand.
Changes to 
production facilities 
to provide key 
technologies for 
next generation 
green propulsion 
and energy sectors.	
Increased input 
costs due to carbon 
taxes, voluntary 
carbon removals 
and higher cost 
of low-carbon 
raw materials and 
services.
Additional capex 
required to 
substitute fossil fuel 
fired processes to 
meet internal GHG 
reduction targets.
Physical disruption 
to Meggitt facilities 
and supply chains.
Impact of climate-related risks and 
opportunities on our strategy
The world has a few short years to meet 
the challenge of climate change in order 
to avoid its worst effects. We are a key 
supplier of technology to the critical 
aviation, defence and energy markets and 
as such we recognise the important role 
we play in the ongoing carbon transition.
The opportunities and risks that climate 
change pose are managed as an integral 
part of our strategic plan for the business 
(see page 62), in terms of how demand 
will change for existing and new products 
and how our operations will change in 
terms of greenhouse gas emissions, 
and resilience to changing climate. The 
strategic planning process is integrated 
with our financial planning processes 
and includes climate change scenarios 
with a focus on the evolution of air travel, 
potential launches of new types of aircraft 
and engines, and impact on our sites.
Our strategy is heavily influenced by 
the risks and opportunities we have 
identified, and consideration of these 
are incorporated into our business and 
financial planning processes. Innovation 
is at the heart of everything we do, 
and enabling a sustainable future is a 
core element of our purpose, driving 
our long-term strategy. Recognising 
the opportunity in supporting our end 
markets through the carbon transition, 
in 2020 we committed that at least two- 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
61
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Scenario
Scenario summary
Main risks
Main opportunities
Impact
Mitigation
~1.5-2 degree 
warming
The global economy 
de-carbonises 
largely in line with 
the commitments 
made under the Paris 
Agreement.
Primarily transition risks:
•	 Market – short-medium-
term reduction in 
demand for flying as 
consumer priorities 
evolve, prior to 
technological change 
enabling low-carbon 
commercial flight.
•	 Regulatory – reduced 
margin due to 
internalisation of carbon 
cost through e.g. 
carbon taxes.
Accelerated transition 
to Net Zero in energy 
and aviation stimulates 
greater demand for 
Meggitt’s sustainability-
focused and 
low-carbon enabling 
technology.
We’ve considered a 
wide range of demand 
and supply shocks, 
including risk related 
to climate change in 
our overall viability 
assessment. More 
details can be found 
on pages 55-57.
Full economic 
modelling of balance 
of risk and opportunity 
in this scenario is 
under review.
Market – Investment 
targets for low-carbon 
technologies to enable 
systemic carbon 
transition enable 
continued growth 
(see page 84).
Regulatory – Progressive 
investment in permanent 
abatement to achieve 
science-based targets to 
minimise regulatory risk.
~3-4 degree 
warming
The global economy 
does not make 
sufficient progress on 
reducing emissions 
to limit the average 
temperature rise to 
<2 degree over pre-
industrial levels.
Primarily physical risks:
•	 Disruption of global 
supply chains.
•	 Increased severe 
weather events 
disrupting our 
manufacturing facilities.
•	 Reduction in demand 
for flying driven by 
economic disruption.
Although, in this 
scenario air travel 
may continue to 
grow, we do not see 
opportunities related 
specifically to climate 
change.
We conduct physical 
risk assessments of our 
sites’ vulnerability to 
natural events.
Full economic 
modelling of balance 
of risk and opportunity 
in this scenario is 
under review.
Work with insurers to 
continually update 
specific site risk and 
mitigation measures.
Increased focus on 
resilience in supply 
chain strategy.
thirds of our Research & Technology 
investment would be into sustainable 
technologies, outlined in more detail 
on page 84. We work closely with our 
customers to develop the next generation 
of lighter, more efficient systems and 
components, as well as the breakthrough 
technology needed to reach Net Zero.
Our strategic planning process for 
our operating businesses ensures that 
climate-related risks and opportunities are 
considered and incorporated in individual 
business unit strategy. In addition, we 
include material risks and opportunities, 
including those related to climate, into 
our investment cases.
We also understand the important 
contribution of our own operations – we 
have reduced net Scope 1 and 2 emissions 
by 50% since 20151, and in 2021 committed 
to setting updated, science-based targets 
in line with the 1.5 degree pathway of the 
Paris Agreement. Our abatement plan 
will also contribute to our customers’ and 
suppliers’ Scope 3 reduction targets, and 
we constantly look for opportunities to 
collaborate to support the more efficient 
decarbonisation of the full value chain (e.g. 
through our membership of the International 
Aerospace Environmental Group).
As part of our sustainability strategy, 
in 2022 we will work to further embed 
our climate impact into key business 
decision-making processes – developing 
common and consistent methodologies 
for management to assess and quantify 
environmental impact, and ensure that 
decisions are consistent with our science-
based reduction targets.
Resilience of our strategy
In assessing scenarios affecting the 
long-term viability of the Group, climate 
change was considered as a potential 
driver of both demand and supply 
side shocks.
In understanding how our business may 
be impacted by climate-related risks and 
opportunities based on our strategy, 
we consider two high level scenarios 
emerging by 2030, outlined below:
•	 1.5-2 degrees
–	 In this scenario, the global response to 
the threat of climate change is timely 
and effective, and succeeds in limiting 
global average temperatures to 1.5-2 
degrees over pre-industrial levels. 
The global business environment 
is characterised by coordinated 
government policy and regulation such 
as carbon taxes, as well as consumer 
behaviour favouring low-carbon 
products and services. With regard 
to our end markets – in civil aviation, 
demand growth is dampened until 
technological change enables low- 
carbon commercial flight and growth 
can re-start, and the energy market 
accelerates its transition towards large- 
scale renewables and away from fossil 
fuel generation.
•	 3-4 degree pathway
–	 In this scenario, there is less 
coordinated and concerted effort, 
change is slower and more piecemeal, 
emissions remain at or close to 2021 
levels and the world starts to feel 
ever more effects of climate change 
through the 2020s. The temperature 
continues to climb on the trajectory 
to hit 4 degrees, leading to significant 
disruption in societies, economies and 
supply chains across the world. In this 
scenario, there is both demand and 
supply side impact as the physical 
manifestations of climate change 
emerge in the shape of extreme 
weather events, and biodiversity loss 
and desertification leading to food 
system disruption and mass migration.
Both scenarios present risk (and in some 
cases opportunity) to our business, but 
each has a greater or lesser degree of 
transition and physical risks as outlined in 
the table below (with linked mitigation)
1	
Relative to revenue.
Taskforce on Climate-related  
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
62

To further understand the physical risk 
that climate change presents to our 
business, we have undertaken a high 
level assessment of the impact of natural 
hazards, including those made more likely 
by climate change (flood, wildfire and 
wind storm).
A specialist third party analysed Meggitt’s 
key manufacturing sites, utilising 
desktop modelling for each location, 
considering a variety of hazard zones. The 
geographic concentration of sites within 
the portfolio was mapped to understand 
risk clusters. The number of high and 
extreme risk assets within the portfolio 
was identified, along with the peril types 
driving exposure. A report was then 
produced analysing which portfolios and 
countries are most exposed to each peril, 
determining key drivers, and aggregating 
the information to understand where 
resilience resources should be targeted.
We intend to conduct further risk analysis 
in 2022, aligned with climate change 
scenarios, to greater understand the 
physical risks to the business prevalent in 
the 3-4 degree warming scenario.
In summary, through our risk and 
opportunity management process 
and the mitigating actions we are 
undertaking, we believe we are resilient 
to the majority of risks presented by 
climate change currently assessed, and 
well positioned to take advantage of 
the opportunities deriving from the Net 
Zero transition. 
During 2022 we intend to further develop 
our risk and opportunity assessment 
framework, and continually review 
mitigating actions based on scenario 
modelling and analysis.
3) Risk Management 
The Group maintains a robust risk 
management framework based on ISO 
31000, and includes a formal process for 
identifying, assessing and responding 
to risk, including climate-related risk. 
Our risk management processes are 
detailed on page 48, and includes 
a series of Group-wide control and 
actions to mitigate principal risks to 
our business. Our published principal 
risks have included a specific risk for 
climate change since 2020 (consolidating 
previous climate-related risks previously 
incorporated into other risks) along with 
potential impact and mitigation. 
In addition, we model both demand 
and supply side shocks to our business 
in order to test ongoing viability, and 
risk related to climate change is a 
specific consideration.
4) Metrics & Targets
We have a number of metrics and targets 
which allow us to measure and reduce our 
impact on the environment, summarised 
on page 82. For our carbon emissions 
specifically, we track Gross and Net 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions (reported in line 
with the Greenhouse Gas protocol), which 
are measured by site and communicated 
quarterly for Board and management 
level reporting and management 
action purposes.
Our existing Greenhouse Gas reduction 
target is to reduce Scope 1 and 2 
emissions, normalised for revenue, by 
50% by 2025 (with a 2015 base year). We 
are on track to achieve this reduction 
early, and so have committed to update 
this target by 2023, including a Scope 3 
measure, in line with the requirements of 
the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) 
for the 1.5 degree pathway.
Throughout 2021 and for 2022 Meggitt 
has and will continue to put in place 
appropriate plan and incentives for 
the businesses to invest in reducing 
our impact by:
•	 Setting a clear direction by committing 
to setting science-based targets, 
illustrating the methodology and the 
data throughout the business and 
in reporting;
•	 Cascading site level in-year 
environmental targets through our 
strategy deployment process;
•	 Incorporating Scope 1 and 2 reduction 
measures into our LTIP measure;
•	 Implementing an internal carbon 
price to ensure cost of climate impact 
is embedded in business decisions 
– e.g. capital expenditure within our 
facilities; and 
•	 Laying out a roadmap to substitute 
fossil fuel-fired processes and 
facilities, including long-term capital 
allocation planning.
We have conducted initial screening 
of our Scope 3 inventory to identify 
the most material categories, and 
are working to develop a consistent 
calculation methodology in line with the 
Greenhouse Gas Protocol. In calculating 
our full Scope 3 inventory we will utilise 
voluntary methodologies, tools and 
standards appropriate to the aerospace, 
defence and energy markets (such as 
those developed by the International 
Aerospace Environmental Group). In 2022 
we will refine our initial Scope 3 baseline 
and commence reporting of material 
Scope 3 emissions by 2023, with a view 
to progressively incorporating absolute 
Scope 3 reduction measures into our 
climate-related KPIs and targets as 
outlined above, including those covered 
by our forthcoming science-based 
targets. These targets will be linked to 
business decision-making processes as 
outlined in Section 2 above.
To ensure we are positioned to meet 
customers’ increasing demand for 
enabling technologies for sustainable 
aviation, we have set a target that two-
thirds of our Research & Technology 
investment would be in sustainable 
technologies (see page 84) – we continue 
to track and actively manage this metric.
We constantly review our metrics and 
targets to ensure that the data reported 
is aligned with our strategy, targets, and 
provides the information needed for 
our business leaders to drive results. We 
also review other relevant data, such as 
market data and reports, as well as our 
customers’ and suppliers’ commitments 
and expectations, to provide an 
indicator on the status of our climate 
change-related risks and opportunities, 
our stakeholder expectations in the 
context of their own commitments, and 
changes to our strategy and planning 
processes required.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
63
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
ENABLING 
A MORE 
SUSTAINABLE 
FUTURE
We are committed to working in partnership with 
our employees, communities, customers, suppliers 
and shareholders to protect our people and planet 
and to develop technologies for the benefit 
of future generations.
Corporate Responsibility
People
Planet
Technology
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
64

Our Corporate Responsibility and 
Sustainability Policy supports our strategy 
for a sustainable future by concentrating 
on three core pillars: People, Planet 
and Technology. Our strategy is tied to 
four of the United Nations Sustainable 
Development Goals, and allows us to 
strengthen our relationships with all of 
our stakeholder groups.
2021 saw Meggitt expand even further 
the role of corporate responsibility 
across the Group. Our work on our 
strategic portfolio, our investment in 
differentiated technologies, alongside 
our commitment to manufacturing 
efficiencies and our high performance 
culture, values, and diversity and 
inclusion all contribute to the sustainable 
development of our business and is the 
key to our continued long-term success.
Delivering on 
our commitments
Focusing on our People, our Planet and our Technology 
as the framework to enable a more sustainable future 
and deliver on our commitments to our stakeholders.
Technology
To support the evolving needs of our 
global customers we will continue to 
invest in innovative new technologies 
to enable sustainable aviation.
  Read more on page 83
Planet
Our goal is to contribute to  
a cleaner future by continually  
improving and adapting  
our operations.
  Read more on page 78
People
We are committed to creating a 
rewarding and safe working culture 
for all colleagues and supporting  
our communities.
  Read more on page 72
Our sustainability pillars
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
65
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
01 Strategy 
and Approach
Our approach to Corporate 
Responsibility and 
Sustainability is a vital 
thread across the whole 
business which is integrated 
into our strategy and 
priorities. As we venture 
into the future with all 
our stakeholders we are 
developing a business that 
is innovative and conscious 
of our responsibilities, from 
reducing our emissions 
and inequalities to driving 
forward an ethical culture 
and supply chain. We 
continue to develop our 
approach to sustainability 
and reporting mechanisms 
whilst understanding our 
opportunities through our 
sustainability framework 
of People, Planet 
and Technology.
02 Corporate Responsibility 
& Sustainability Policy 
•	 Addresses our key stakeholders: 
employees, customers, suppliers, 
shareholders and the wider 
community; 
•	 upholding sound corporate 
governance principles and applying 
the UK Corporate Governance Code; 
•	 supporting the Ten Principles of the 
United Nations Global Compact, 
relating to human rights, labour, the 
environment and anti-corruption; 
•	 upholding our employees’  
human rights; 
•	 encouraging dialogue with 
employees through engagement 
and our Speak Up Line; 
•	 building a more diverse and inclusive 
Meggitt, including meeting reporting 
requirements such as gender pay 
gap and gender ratios for executives 
and the Board; 
•	 minimising the environmental 
impact of products and processes 
and maintaining internationally 
accredited environmental 
management systems standard 
ISO 14001; 
•	 conducting business relationships 
ethically and responsibly; 
•	 complying with anti-slavery and 
human-trafficking legislation; 
•	 working with our suppliers to 
build a sustainable and resilient 
supply chain;
•	 acting as a responsible supplier and 
encouraging all our counterparties 
to do the same; and 
•	 supporting our local communities.
03 Our focus areas and stakeholders
People
Health & Safety
Diversity &
Inclusion 
Technology
Reducing 
aerospace emissions
Supporting green
energy   
Employees
Shareholders
Customers  
& suppliers
Ethics and
business conduct
Anti-bribery
Speaking up  
Planet
Using low-carbon
energy
Reducing our
waste
 
Local  
communities
Stakeholders
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
66

04 Action 
For our stakeholders 
this means: 
•	 committing to invest over two-
thirds of our innovation budget on 
technologies for sustainable aviation 
and energy; 
•	 continuing to improve the 
environmental sustainability and 
resilience of our global sites; 
•	 complying with relevant national 
laws and regulations and 
reporting requirements; 
•	 providing a supportive, rewarding 
and safe working environment; 
•	 embedding the employee 
recognition scheme, “Extraordinary 
People” into the way we work;
•	 delivering training for all employees 
on our Code of Conduct, health  
and safety, anti-harassment and  
other areas; 
•	 continuing to develop our approach 
to employee communications and 
improving our collaboration tools; 
•	 maintaining modern, safe and 
efficient operational practices; 
•	 contributing to the social and 
economic enrichment of local 
communities, focusing particularly 
on activities related to STEM,  
and the work of our Employee 
Resource Groups; 
•	 having effective risk identification  
and mitigation policies and 
procedures across all areas  
of the business; 
•	 removing all sales agents from 
our business and implementing a 
continuous improvement plan for 
all intermediaries; 
•	 conducting audits and risk assurance 
reviews in key compliance areas; and
•	 adopting robust internal and external 
reporting and controls, and ensuring 
financial probity.
05 Governance and Compliance
Ultimately, the Board 
is responsible for the 
implementation and 
monitoring of our 
Corporate Responsibility 
and Sustainability 
Policy (CR&S Policy).
Ongoing monitoring of corporate 
responsibility (CR) activities has 
been delegated by the Board to the 
Corporate Responsibility Committee 
(CR Committee). The CR Committee 
maintains oversight of ethics and 
business conduct, sustainability, 
charitable and community activities. 
The CR Committee also oversees the 
Board’s approach to implementing 
sections of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 (the 2018 
Code) and the UK Companies Act 2006 
relevant to stakeholder engagement. 
Nancy Gioia, the Chair of the CR 
Committee also performs the role of 
Non-Executive Director responsible for 
Employee Engagement. The role and 
activities undertaken by Nancy in 2021 
are outlined on page 92. 
In 2021, the Board of Directors 
continued to receive updates on 
diversity and inclusion activities across 
the Group, including the significant 
progress in 2021 with our Employee 
Resource Groups and the Meggitt 
Inclusion Week held in September. 
Health and safety reporting is also 
overseen directly by the Board 
with regular reports from the Chief 
Executive, and in 2021 the Board 
reviewed current health, safety and 
environmental performance with the VP 
Health, Safety and Environment and the 
Group Director of Operations.
Group support is provided to ensure 
we fulfil the requirements outlined in 
our CR&S Policy, and our divisional 
presidents, product group leaders 
and site directors take responsibility 
for implementing Group policies 
and procedures locally. Day-to-day 
responsibilities of the Board and the 
Chief Executive for overseeing the 
CR&S Policy in 2021 were delegated 
as follows: 
•	 the Group Operations Director 
had functional responsibility for 
environment and sustainability and 
health and safety, led by our Group 
Director, Sustainability and VP Health, 
Safety and Environment; 
•	 the Group HR Director led initiatives 
focused on culture, diversity, inclusion 
and employee engagement; and 
•	 the Group Company Secretary had 
functional responsibility for ethics 
and business conduct and charity and 
community matters, working closely 
with our Group General Counsel 
& Director, Corporate Affairs, and 
Group HR Director.
In 2021, health and safety (total 
recordable incident rate) was a key 
strategic non-financial KPI (see page 
28). In 2021, we introduced carbon 
emissions as another non-financial 
KPI recognising the key strategic 
importance of this area. Data in other 
key areas, such as employees and other 
environmental data are continually 
monitored and assessed and our Group 
progress is reported in this section. Our 
non-financial information statement as 
required by Sections 414CA and 414CB 
of the Companies Act 2006 is set out on  
page 88.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
67
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Environmental, Social and 
Governance (ESG) reporting 
and guidance 
During 2021, Meggitt built on the 2020 
review of environmental, social and 
governance reporting, and further 
embedded the sustainability framework 
of “Enabling our sustainable future” 
through the three pillars of People, 
Planet and Technology.
This framework captures our commitment 
to drive our business to be more sustainable.
Our framework covers the reporting 
requirements under the Taskforce on 
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (see 
page 58) and is also linked to the United 
Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
United Nations Sustainable 
Development Goals
After aligning to four United Nations 
Sustainable Development Goals in 2020 
which integrate into the overall Meggitt 
strategy, Meggitt has continued to develop 
its corporate responsibility approach 
(see pages 66 and 67). During 2021, 
the following progress has been made:
UN Sustainable  
Development Goal
Our approach
Our commitment
What we  
did in 2021
9 Industry, innovation  
and infrastructure 
Inclusive and sustainable 
industrialisation, together with 
innovation and infrastructure, 
can unleash dynamic and 
competitive economic forces 
that generate employment 
and income. They play a 
key role in introducing and 
promoting new technologies, 
facilitating international trade 
and enabling the efficient use 
of resources.
Meggitt can contribute to this 
goal by encouraging innovation 
and continuing our commitment 
to research and development 
on sustainable technologies for 
aviation and energy.
See our pillars on Planet 
and Technology.
•	 Investing two-thirds of our Applied Research 
& Technology spend in technologies and 
products needed for sustainable aviation 
and low-carbon power generation; 
•	 Membership of the UK Government’s 
Jet Zero Council which is a partnership 
between industry and Government in the 
UK to bring together ministers and chief 
executive officer-level stakeholders to 
drive the ambitious delivery of new 
technologies and innovative ways to 
cut aviation emissions; and 
•	 Working with established and new 
companies developing innovative low-
carbon solutions.
•	 See technology 
case studies 
throughout;
•	 Footprint 
reduction;
•	 Reduced 
emissions;
•	 Utilising Employee 
Resource Groups 
(ERGs) across the 
business; and
•	 Joining the UN’s 
Race to Zero and 
committing to 
setting targets 
under the SBTi 
framework.
UN Sustainability  
Development Goal
Our approach
Our commitment
What we  
did in 2021
10 Reduced 
inequalities 
Reducing inequalities and 
ensuring no one is left  
behind are integral to 
achieving the Sustainable 
Development Goals.
Meggitt can contribute to this goal 
by empowering and promoting 
the social, economic and political 
inclusion of all, irrespective of 
age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, 
origin, religion or economic or 
other status.
See our pillar on People.
•	 Continuing commitment to our values and 
our High Performance Culture (HPC) journey; 
•	 Creating and supporting Employee Resource 
Groups which sponsor, promote and 
challenge our approach to diversity and 
inclusion across Meggitt;
•	 Increased emphasis on our Speak Up culture; 
•	 Commitment to Gender Pay Gap and other 
diversity related data reporting; and 
•	 Increased community-based charity support 
connected to STEM and our Employee 
Resource Groups.
•	 Inclusion Week 
– multiple ERG 
activities;
•	 Joined 10,000 
black interns 
programme;
•	 Launched 
Community Heroes 
programme 
enabling 
employees to 
support local 
good causes.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
68

UN Sustainability  
Development Goal
Our approach
Our commitment
What we  
did in 2021
16 Peace, justice  
and strong 
institutions 
Promote peaceful and 
inclusive societies for 
sustainable development.
Meggitt can contribute to this 
goal by:
taking action to prevent modern 
slavery within Meggitt and our 
supply chain; 
implementing policies, processes 
and awareness training to prevent 
bribery and corruption; and 
ensuring effective and 
accountable reporting.
See our section on Corporate 
compliance and business conduct.
•	 Increased transparent reporting in the 
environmental, social and governance space;
•	 Increased emphasis on creating a sound 
Anti-Bribery & Corruption compliance 
programme through our annual continuous 
improvement plan; 
•	 Driving ethical business conduct through 
emphasis on our Speak Up culture;
•	 Creation and support for our Employee 
Resource Groups;
•	 Continuing commitment to our High 
Performance Culture journey; and
•	 All-employee yearly compliance training 
in key areas including our Code of Conduct, 
ethical business practices and health 
and safety.
•	 Revised Financial 
Crime policy;
•	 Revised Anti-
Corruption and 
Ethical Business 
Conduct Policy;
•	 Risk Assurance  
reviews;
•	 Improved data 
analysis for 
ethics cases; and
•	 Launched ethics 
investigation 
standard process 
and training.
UN Sustainability  
Development Goal
Our approach
Our commitment
What we  
did in 2021
12 Responsible  
consumption and 
production 
Worldwide consumption  
and production – a driving 
force of the global economy 
– rest on the use of the natural 
environment and resources 
in a way that continues to 
have destructive impacts 
on the planet.
Meggitt can contribute to this goal 
by concentrating on: 
achieving the environmentally 
sound management of chemicals 
and all wastes throughout their 
lifecycle and significantly reducing 
their release into air, water and soil 
in order to minimise their adverse 
impacts on human health and 
the environment;
substantially reducing waste 
generation through prevention, 
reduction, recycling and reuse; and 
adopting sustainable practices 
and to integrate sustainability 
information into our 
reporting cycle. 
See our pillar on Planet.
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions 
and waste to landfill, which are being 
managed by opportunities to maximise 
operational efficiencies:
•	 Setting science-based targets for GHG 
reduction in line with 1.5 deg pathway;
•	 Sourcing renewable energy; 
•	 Harmonising more sustainable practices 
across our sites including waste recycling, 
minimising plastics, electric car charging;
•	 Sites maintaining ISO 14001 certification; 
•	 Site-level environmental performance 
monitoring and reporting against targets;
•	 increased external reporting in the 
environmental, social and governance space 
including the Taskforce on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures.
•	 GHG reductions;
•	 Purchased 
renewable energy;
•	 Reviewing waste 
goals;
•	 Environmental 
targets for each 
site; 
•	 Commenced TCFD 
reporting; and
•	 Joined the UN’s 
Race to Zero and 
committing to 
setting targets 
under the SBTi 
framework.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
69
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Our behaviours with each other, our customers, 
our suppliers and in our communities must be 
exemplary and we must accept nothing less. 
Corporate Responsibility 
Committee
As Chair of the Corporate Responsibility 
Committee, Nancy Gioia’s role is to 
ensure that we oversee the Group’s 
activities in the areas of ethics and 
business conduct, environment and 
charity and community. 
Our values and commitments are set out 
in our CR&S Policy to ensure it reflects 
our strategic goal to conduct business 
in a sustainable, long-term manner 
while demonstrating a high degree of 
social responsibility. Our approach and 
performance in this area is monitored 
closely by the CR Committee and 
oversight is provided by the Board. 
The CR Committee covers ethics and 
business conduct, environmental 
performance, charity and community 
in detail. It also ensures that the Board 
meets its responsibilities under the 2018 
Code and UK Companies Act 2006 on 
stakeholder engagement, and other 
reporting requirements. 
The challenges created by the COVID-19 
pandemic continued to bring all matters 
related to corporate responsibility and 
sustainability to the fore in 2021. During 
2021, we received detailed progress 
reports on environmental performance, 
sustainability and ethics and business 
conduct including trend analysis, detailed 
Speak Up Line case reports, and updates 
on all-employee training. We also 
received reports on supplier engagement 
and discussed feedback on employee 
engagement activities. We also discussed 
specifically the impact of COVID-19 on 
our stakeholder groups to ensure our 
approach was balanced.
Committee membership and 
attendance in 2021
Mrs N L Gioia
(Committee Chairman)
Mr A Wood
Mrs L S Burdett
Mr G S Berruyer
Mr A Garard
  x Scheduled meetings
Teamwork 
In 2021 new training on our ethics 
investigations process was rolled out 
to relevant employees from different 
functions including in Health & Safety, 
Quality, Commercial, Legal and Human 
Resources in order to standardise and 
provide a consistent standard to all 
ethics investigations. Best practice 
was shared and a single approach was 
adopted enabling all investigators to 
work as a team globally.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
70

2021 in numbers
0.9 
ethics cases per 100 
employees globally
+31,000 
hours of training 
delivered to all employees
51
trained ethics investigators
37%
reduction YoY in Scope 1 and 2
GHG emissions (market-based)
50%
of all energy consumed from 
renewable sources
Customers 
The Board discussed engagement 
with customers at every meeting 
during 2021. The Committee 
determined that the regular 
reports to the Board and customer 
updates were appropriate and gave 
the Board a good oversight and 
understanding of customer views. 
Our markets and key customer 
activities are outlined in our Strategic 
Report (page 24).
Suppliers 
The Chief Procurement Officer 
presented an update on the 
implementation of our supply 
chain strategy to the Board and 
detailed written reports on supplier 
engagement were provided direct 
to the Committee in 2021. This 
highlighted that Meggitt’s approach 
to supply chain management is 
evolving, with a targeted reduction 
in the cost and complexity of our 
supply chain, but a deeper level of 
engagement with retained suppliers.
Employees 
The Board reviewed reports from 
executive management on employee 
engagement and culture on a regular 
basis. The Committee reviewed 
the activities of the Non-Executive 
Director for Employee Engagement 
in detail. The results of the employee 
engagement survey as well as the 
whistleblowing hotline and ethics 
programme were also reviewed by 
the Board and CR Committee (see 
pages 74 and 87).
•	 A focus on the impact of COVID-19 on 
our stakeholder groups, particularly 
in relation to actions taken by 
management to control cost;
•	 Appointment of Group Director of 
Sustainability to drive operational 
improvements connected to 
environmental sustainability across 
the Group; 
•	 Expansion of the Ethics Management 
Committee to provide direction on all 
employee compliance training;
•	 Continuing to minimise sales agents in 
our business;
•	 Refreshing our Financial Crime Policy 
and also updating and consolidating 
our Anti-Corruption and Ethical 
Business Conduct policies; 
•	 Improving data analysis in connection 
with the independent Speak Up Line 
to identify trends and shape training 
requirements across the business;
•	 Launched our employee volunteering 
programme “Community Heroes” 
giving all employees time to volunteer 
for worthy causes;
Shareholders 
The Committee determined that 
the regular reports to the Board 
on shareholder engagement 
during 2021, in addition to direct 
engagement by the Chairman, 
Executive Directors and Chair of 
the Remuneration Committee 
were appropriate and gave the 
Board a good level of oversight 
and understanding of shareholder 
views. Our shareholder engagement 
activities are described in more 
detail on page 90.
•	 Implementing site-level key 
performance indicators and targets 
for environmental measures such as 
energy and water consumption and 
waste to landfill;
•	 Joined the United Nations Race to 
Zero campaign – committing to reduce 
absolute value chain emissions in line 
with a trajectory compatible with a 1.5 
degree Celsius warming scenario, and 
reaching Net Zero before 2050;
•	 Joined the 10,000 Black interns 
programme in the UK with anticipation 
of hiring 13 interns from the programme;
•	 Continuing with the LeadX training 
programme for high-potential leaders 
across the Group and Spitfire Training 
Programme for operations leaders;
•	 Grew the percentage of electricity 
consumed from renewable sources 
through a mix of on-site generation 
and market-based measures; and
•	 Scope 2 emissions reporting to capture 
both location-based and market-based 
methodologies.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
71
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
PEOPLE
Meggitt continues to put our people first  
through our values, our work towards a high 
performing and inclusive and diverse culture, 
as well as supporting our communities.
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
72

 EXCELLENCE
We enable the 
extraordinary 
at Meggitt.
We are good at what we do and 
that’s why customers come back to 
us. We are constantly working to 
improve our processes and attention 
to detail. As a result, we deliver 
the most ambitious technologies, 
products and services safely, 
efficiently and cost-effectively to 
our customers.
INTEGRITY
At Meggitt we do the right 
thing, in the right way 
wherever we operate. 
Our colleagues, customers and the 
communities we are part of can 
count on us to act with integrity, 
honesty and respect. We form lasting 
positive relationships built on open 
communication, understanding, 
fairness and impartiality. We conduct 
ourselves with integrity and the 
highest standards of ethical behaviour 
across the business.
TEAMWORK
At Meggitt, we support 
each other and recognise 
outstanding contributions. 
By working together, we bring 
extraordinary technology to 
our customers. We build great 
relationships with all of our 
stakeholders, providing the support 
they need to succeed. We build highly 
skilled teams passionate about what 
we do and how we do it. 
Living our values
and gain support for any culture-related 
programmes.
High Performance 
Culture (HPC)
68% of our total workforce have attended 
unfreezing sessions (including 87% of 
our leaders). Due to the challenges 
we faced as a result of the COVID-19 
pandemic, we were unable to support 
the volume of in person training required 
and therefore our goals to achieve higher 
Our values and culture
To accelerate our progress towards 
becoming a truly integrated global 
business and cultivating a culture of high 
performance, we focused our efforts on 
employee and leadership development, 
diversity and inclusion, employee 
engagement, and recognition. Culture 
forums were held across the organisation 
on a bi-monthly basis. This forum is where 
our site and product group leaders can 
update progress on culture plans, share 
ideas and best practices as well as reinforce 
Our values reflect how we should work together and the behaviours that are 
integral to our culture. Our work on culture continues to be a key part of our overall 
Group strategy and supported by culture plans established in the business.
participation rates have been delayed 
into 2022, however, in order to combat 
these challenges some sessions have 
been conducted virtually. Our target is to 
ensure over 90% of our employees have 
attended unfreezing sessions by the end 
of 2022. We also launched content across 
the workforce to reinforce HPC on a 
daily basis in DLA meetings and through 
intranet articles and videos. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
73
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Diversity and Inclusion
Our Diversity and Inclusion Policy sets 
out our commitments at Board-level to 
making Meggitt a diverse and inclusive 
organisation. The Policy reinforces that 
we employ a diverse workforce that 
reflects the diverse communities within 
which we operate and that we always 
foster an inclusive culture where people 
are valued, respected and supported.
The Board, executive management and 
leaders across the Group recognise that a 
diverse and inclusive workforce is critical 
to running a sustainable and successful 
business. To reinforce our commitment 
to creating a diverse and inclusive 
environment, we have created divisional-
level diversity plans, and established a 
Group-wide Diversity & Inclusion Council.
During 2021 we saw substantial progress 
in the number of employees engaged 
with our Employee Resource Groups 
(ERG), from 400 ambassadors to over 
1,100. We held our annual Diversity 
& Inclusion Week event with 18 sites 
hosting events along with virtual sessions 
focused on learning more about our 
ERGs. Employee Resource Group leaders 
were trained in advanced concepts 
relating to diversity and inclusion. 
ERGs took the lead on many activities 
throughout the year to raise awareness, 
educate, and support the cultivation of 
an environment where employees can 
be at their best, including celebrating 
International Women’s Day and Women 
in Engineering Day, Pride Week and 
Black History month in the US and UK. 
Employees also took part in the Steps 
for Vet’s Challenge, Remembrance Day 
Celebrations and joined talks on Latino 
History. Additionally, in support of Suicide 
prevention week, our SHINE ERG hosted 
“Subject Matter Expert” talks at multiple 
sites and provided Mental Health First 
Responders training. We also launched 
Community Heroes, our community 
and charity outreach programme which 
enables employees to volunteer for local 
good causes in their community.
Our UK gender pay gap reduced from 
9.3% to 5.7% in 2021, with progress driven 
by several senior executive changes 
and our increased focus on diversity 
and inclusion. Our full UK gender pay 
gap statement will be available on our 
website by April 2022. We are committed 
to building a more diverse and inclusive 
Meggitt and meeting reporting 
requirements including gender pay gap 
reporting and the FTSE Women Leaders 
Review, as well as equal pay and fostering 
a fair and transparent environment where 
employees are rewarded based on their 
position, competencies, performance 
and contribution.
Meggitt does not discriminate on the 
grounds of age, colour, disability, ethnic 
or national origin, gender, gender 
expression, gender identity, marital 
status, pregnancy, race, religion or belief, 
or sexual orientation and new hires are 
offered positions based on merit, taking 
account of their specific skills, experience 
and knowledge. All individuals are 
supported during their employment 
through training, career development 
and awareness of diversity and inclusion 
groups are promoted to all employees 
through our Employee Resource Groups.
Employee recognition
A culture of appreciation and recognition is 
an important building block for our values. 
Our Extraordinary People programme is 
a way of recognising the special efforts 
and commitment of individual colleagues 
and teams across the whole of Meggitt. 
Open to all, this programme, together with 
recognition schemes already running at 
local sites, is motivational and rewarding, 
helping to create a culture of customer 
service and appreciation. Nominations 
are accepted for individuals and teams in 
seven categories: Operational Excellence, 
Innovation, Teamwork, Safety, Sustainability, 
Customer Service and Community. 
The level of uptake of this recognition 
scheme has been very well received 
by staff, having received over 4,000 
nominations in 2021. 
Employee engagement 
and feedback
We recognise that our future success 
depends upon our shared sense of 
purpose and it is important that we find 
out from our employees what they think 
about Meggitt and how they feel about 
the work that they do. 
Our work on culture, particularly 
throughout a challenging period for 
the Group and for our people over the 
last two years, has been reflected in our 
results for 2021 which show engagement 
Group Board
5
56%
4
44%
Senior managers*
97
82%
21
18%
Wider employees
6,490
70%
2,790
30%
*	 includes members of the Executive Committee, direct reports of the Executive Committee and,  
as required by s414C of the Companies Act 2006, subsidiary directors.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
74

levels rising 2% from 2020 (and 4% 
above the global high performing 
benchmark). Most improved areas are 
ethical behaviours, team-working and 
cooperation, challenging the status 
quo and ongoing feedback. The area 
most needing to improve is reducing 
bureaucracy and efficiency of processes, 
which is an area of ongoing focus.
Training and development
We invest time and energy into ensuring 
we attract, develop and retain the best 
talent to ensure people succeed based 
on their skills, behaviours, knowledge and 
experience. We have had great success 
in the two programmes we launched in 
2020, LeadX for high-potential leaders 
completed two cohorts and launched two 
additional cohorts in 2021. 
Spitfire for operations leaders continued 
with great success in 2021. Cohort 1 and 
2 both graduated from the programme, 
completing ten “Action Learning 
Projects”, each with significant cost 
savings to the business. Our current 
Cohort 3 includes 26 participants across 
the US and Mexico, with eight actively 
progressing Action Learning Projects. 
Several of our sites also launched 
operator certification programmes 
to upskill employees while improving 
operational performance. 
We continue to develop employees’ 
leadership capabilities and during the 
year implemented formal programmes 
to raise capability in functional teams, 
including finance, engineering, 
information technology, procurement, 
project and programme management.
We also continue to build on our 
graduate and apprenticeship 
programmes with 41 graduates in the 
programme and 61 apprentices. We 
were also the first aerospace company 
to participate in the 10,000 Black interns 
programme in the UK, and we expect to 
hire 13 new interns in 2022 as a result. 
The market for talent acquisition 
and labour shortages has presented 
challenges in several of the regions 
in which we operate. Despite the 
challenges, our talent acquisition team 
worked closely with our leaders to ensure 
we could secure talent at pace.
In our efforts to improve processes related 
to people, we created shared service teams 
in the UK and US to manage employee 
transactions more efficiently and enabling 
better use of our technology for employee 
self-service. AskHR and our intranet 
supports employees and managers on 
items related to HR policy and processes. 
Communities and charities
The Sponsorship & Charitable Giving 
Policy contains guidance about the 
types of organisations (charitable and 
non-charitable) that we will consider 
funding, with criteria that are aligned to 
our Values. It is the responsibility of our 
Group Director of Ethics and Corporate 
Responsibility to ensure the policy is 
followed across the Group including 
providing guidance on charitable giving, 
and communicating this policy across 
the business. 
Each site is ultimately responsible for 
agreeing and administering its own 
budget for charitable donations and 
sponsorships to ensure they have a 
positive impact on the local community 
that they support and in which their 
business operates. In 2021 Meggitt 
donated to a number of charities aligned 
to the goals set out by our Employee 
Resource Groups and foodbanks in 
the UK and US which are linked to our 
local communities. Our plan for work 
with charities in 2022 will continue to 
Headcount by division
Number of employees 
and contractors
 Airframe Systems
4,406
 Engine Systems
2,249
 Energy & Equipment
1,215
 Services & Support
551
 Central
849
 Legacy Businesses
–
Total
9,270
Headcount by region
Number of employees 
and contractors
 UK
2,327
 Rest of Europe
940
 USA
4,644
 Rest of World
1,359
Total
9,270
Headcount by length of service
Number of employees 
and contractors
 Less than 5 years
4,558
 Between 5 and 10 years
1,640
 Between 10 and 15 years
1,115
 Between 15 and 20 years
749
 Between 20 and 25 years
580
 Over 25 years
628
Total
9,270
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
75
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
be aligned to our sites and their local 
communities and the work our Employee 
Resource Groups do. 
In addition to charitable giving, Meggitt 
launched a new volunteering scheme 
called Community Heroes. In the spirit 
of community and sustainability Meggitt 
wants to celebrate our extraordinary 
people who already contribute to their 
local communities and charities and 
give them an additional day’s paid leave 
to spend within their communities, or 
give others the opportunity to give back 
through various initiatives run by our 
sites and Employee Resource Groups. 
Our colleagues have gone above and 
beyond throughout the pandemic and 
Meggitt will continue to support and 
encourage this through our Community 
Heroes programme.
Disability
Meggitt’s policy in relation to the 
employment of disabled persons is to 
give full consideration to job applications 
received from disabled persons. 
Candidates are selected and appointed 
on the basis of their ability to perform the 
duties of the job. 
Where appropriate, special training is 
given to facilitate engagement of the 
disabled and modifications to the job 
are considered. Where an employee 
becomes disabled whilst in our 
employment and is unable to perform 
their existing role, arrangements will 
be made where possible for retraining 
in order that a different job may 
be performed.
Health & Safety
Our Health & Safety Policy sets outs 
responsibilities at all levels of our 
Company towards health and safety and 
the prevention of injury to our employees, 
visitors, contractors, customers and 
others who may be affected by 
our activities.
At Meggitt, we have continuously placed 
the health and safety of our employees, 
contractors, customers and visitors at 
the forefront of everything we do. In 
2021, we continued to take steps to 
ensure that our workers were protected 
against COVID-19 and strongly promoted 
vaccinations for employees. We 
continued to implement the COVID-19 
pandemic risk mitigation measures such 
as social distancing and mandatory 
mask-wearing in accordance with national 
and local government requirements, 
and required sites to conduct COVID-19 
pandemic risk assessments on a 
frequent basis taking into account local 
transmission rates, changes in national 
and local guidelines and requirements 
and information provided by applicable 
health authorities. All of these actions 
allowed our businesses to operate in the 
COVID-19 pandemic as secure and safe 
environments throughout 2021.
We continued to conduct daily safety 
reviews and training through our HPS 
DLA process by presenting health 
and safety topics for discussion at the 
beginning of every day for employees 
at all levels of the Company. These 
discussions also included safety stand 
downs where we shared lessons learned 
across all of our sites from incidents that 
occurred. We also resumed our external 
third-party HSE auditing programme 
which was paused in 2020 due to the 
COVID-19 pandemic and which ensures 
our sites are maintaining compliance with 
applicable health and safety regulations. 
In 2021, we integrated health and 
safety awareness training in our Spitfire 
training programme, which included 
detailed health and safety training for 
members of our executive management 
teams across the Group. This training 
included an awareness training of health 
and safety compliance obligations that 
are applicable to our sites as well as a 
behavioural based safety training which 
focused on how employees’ individual 
behaviours and actions can contribute to 
incidents that occur in the workplace. 
We continue to measure site health and 
safety performance through our Safety 
Star Programme. One key change that 
was made to this Programme in 2021 
was to incorporate our Safety Leadership 
Index (SLI) as a mandatory metric that 
all sites had to achieve in order to 
achieve Platinum Star status. The SLI 
incorporates the number of safety walks 
that our site Senior Leadership teams 
conduct on our production floors, the 
number of Safety Stand Downs (site-
wide discussions on a specific subject 
regarding health and safety) that sites 
conduct, and the number of days in 
which the sites’ safety champions are 
conducting “safe observations” which 
are dedicated to focusing on health and 
safety behaviours and actions as opposed 
to their normal production job. In 2021, 
61% of sites achieved Platinum Star status 
in our Safety Star Programme, which 
represents the highest level of health 
and safety excellence achievable within 
the Company.
In 2021, we continued to reduce our 
Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). 
Our TRIR improved in 2021 to 0.6 (0.7 
in 2020), representing a 0.9% reduction 
year on year as a result of a decade of 
continuous improvement activities. Our 
lost time incident rate (LTIR) was at 0.24 
which represents an excellent indicator 
of preventing serious injuries within 
the Company.
We are targeting all of our sites to 
obtain certification to ISO 45001 for 
their occupational health and safety 
management system by end of 2022. 
In 2021, 60% of sites have achieved this 
target. This will ensure that all of our 
sites are maintaining a health and safety 
management system that provides the 
maximum achievable protection for all of 
our employees.
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
76

2021 saw Meggitt participate in the first year of 
the 10,000 Black Interns programme which aims  
to sustainably tackle Black underrepresentation 
in the UK’s professional industries. 
The scheme plans to cumulatively 
hire 10,000 Black interns over a 
five-year period to help shape career 
trajectories and broaden horizons 
through work experience. Companies 
from numerous sectors pledged one 
or more paid summer internship 
positions to the scheme, to which 
Black students who are studying at, 
or recently graduated from a UK 
university can apply. With over 700 
companies participating in this first 
year, Meggitt was the first aerospace 
company of the seven participants in 
the Engineering & Automotive sector.
All applicants are provided 
with a wide range of training 
opportunities, such as CV writing 
and interview preparation as part 
of the development aspect of the 
programme, providing knowledge 
that candidates will take with them 
into their future careers. 
In December, assessment centres 
for the 2022 summer intake were 
held at Ansty Park, and from a pool 
of high calibre candidates, 13 roles 
were offered in Engineering & Supply 
Chain over 4 UK sites: Ansty Park, 
Fareham, Loughborough and Poole. 
The successful applicants ranged 
from final year PhD candidates to 
students at the beginning of their 
undergraduate degree. 
This programme which reinforces our 
commitment to welcome Black talent 
to the engineering industry, was 
brought forward within Meggitt by 
BE@M, an employee-led group which 
exists to highlight and advocate for 
people of colour within Meggitt. 
10,000 Black Interns. 
13 
Roles were offered 
in Engineering and 
Supply Chain
4
UK sites participated:  
Ansty Park, Fareham, 
Loughborough and Poole
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
77
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
PLANET
Corporate Responsibility
continued
We take our responsibility towards the 
environment seriously, setting ever higher 
ambitions to reduce our impact, and ensuring we 
have achievable plans that we will deliver upon.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
78

Our commitment
At Meggitt we recognise that we have 
an important role in preserving and 
sustaining the finite resources and 
natural capital of our planet for future 
generations. The starting point for our 
contribution to this critical imperative 
for the planet is the impact of our own 
operations, value chain and products. 
In 2021 we renewed our focus on two 
specific environmental areas – our 
greenhouse gas emissions and our 
use of material across our value chain 
– which together provide our greatest 
opportunity to reduce our impact on the 
environment, and accelerate towards our 
sustainable future. 
Our Corporate Responsibility & 
Sustainability (CR&S) Policy and 
our Environmental Policy set out 
our commitments to incorporate 
environmental considerations, 
sustainability and responsibility in all 
aspects of our business by including 
environmental protection, resource 
conservation and waste reduction in 
our strategic planning. Our policies 
require all of our sites to comply 
with relevant legislation, promote 
environmental stewardship and achieve 
recognised ISO14001 certification 
of their environmental management 
systems, and commits us to work with our 
suppliers to minimise any adverse impact 
of their products and operations on 
the environment. 
During 2021, Meggitt appointed its 
first dedicated Group Director of 
Sustainability to review the environmental 
operational performance across the 
Group, define our ambition and create 
the programme to achieve our targets.  
The position has been designed to work 
with our health, safety and environmental 
teams as well as other functional leaders 
and in line with our sustainability, ESG 
and corporate responsibility strategies. A 
clear aim is to focus our innovation, which 
is at the heart of what we do, to build a 
sustainable business for the future, and 
embed sustainability as a thread through 
our whole business.
Greenhouse gas emissions 
We recognise the responsibility that 
we have to play an important role in 
mitigating the most disruptive effects 
of climate change on vulnerable 
populations, by eliminating our net 
greenhouse gas emissions across our 
value chain in line with the goals of the 
Paris Agreement. That’s why, in 2021, 
we joined the United Nations Race to 
Zero campaign – committing to reduce 
absolute value chain emissions in line 
with a trajectory compatible with a 1.5 
degree warming scenario, and reaching 
Net Zero before 2050. 
We have committed, through the 
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), 
to setting science-based greenhouse 
gas reduction targets. These will update 
our existing target to reduce by 50% our 
Scope 1 and 2 emissions (normalised for 
revenue) by 2025 from a 2015 baseline, 
and will incorporate Scope 3 emissions 
for the first time. Our plan to achieve 
these ambitious targets is prioritised 
based on the materiality of our Scope 
1, 2 and 3 emission categories, and the 
important principle of focusing initially 
on our own operations before expanding 
progressively to encompass the 
embedded carbon emissions elsewhere 
in our value chain. 
Our Planet, Our Home
We are gathering momentum towards a sustainable future, committing to 
Net Zero across our value chain in line with a pathway that limits global 
warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and setting science-based targets to make 
further meaningful reductions in our environmental impact in this decade.
Our approach
Our overall approach to meeting 
our environmental commitments 
was agreed in 2021 and is 
summarised by the following 
six points: 
Set out a roadmap to reduce 
materially our Scope 1 emissions  
by progressively replacing Natural 
Gas fired processes with low-  
carbon alternatives. 
Launch a project to reduce the 
effect of the combustion of  
effluent gas from our carbon  
brake manufacturing process. 
Increase our use of renewable 
energy through a blend of on-site 
renewable electricity generation, 
and market-based mechanisms 
such as 100% renewable contracts, 
Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) 
and Renewable Energy Certificates. 
Increase our energy efficiency 
by putting in place measures to 
improve consumption visibility  
and management.
Better understand the carbon 
emissions “embedded” in the 
goods and services we purchase, 
and work with our suppliers to set 
and implement near-term science-  
based reduction targets. 
Progressively embed environmental 
considerations into all our  
business decisions, for example 
through the use of an internal 
“shadow“ carbon price.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
79
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Performance
Overall, our electricity and natural 
gas consumption fell by 8% and 15% 
respectively (0% and 7% normalised 
for revenue), reflecting primarily the 
continued impact of the COVID-19 
pandemic on our operations and the 
consequent re-sizing of the business 
since Q2 2020, and also continuing 
energy efficiency programmes.
Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions also fell 
in absolute terms, driven, in addition 
to continued lower levels of activity, by 
the continued reduction in the carbon 
intensity of the electricity grids in the 
countries in which we operate. Our 
growing on-site generation capacity also 
contributed to gross Scope 2 reductions 
– for example our solar roof at Ansty Park 
generated 2GWh of renewable electricity 
over the course of 2021, supplying 26% 
of the site’s need over the course of the 
year, and saving 440 tonnes of CO2e. 
Our site in Rockmart, US, completed a 
major project in 2021 to replace two of 
their large older boilers with five smaller 
batch boilers which reduces natural gas 
consumption when demands for steam 
are low. 
Our continued footprint consolidation 
strategy has led to a smaller number of 
larger more efficient sites. This activity has 
also contributed to the reduction in our 
GHG emissions.
For the first time, we report our Scope 
2 emissions with both location-based 
and market-based methodologies, 
incorporating our long-standing contracts 
for renewable energy in Switzerland 
and Denmark, and the 100% renewable 
contract in the UK which was introduced 
in 2020. In the US we purchased 
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) 
equivalent to the non-renewable portion 
of our consumption in Kentucky and 
California, and have joined a community-
based solar PV project in the vicinity of 
our Danville, Kentucky, facility. These 
measures lead to a reduction of 50% in 
our market-based Scope 2 emissions 
when compared to the location-
based figure:
We are on track to meet our existing 
GHG reduction target, of a 50% reduction 
in Scope 1 and 2 emissions, normalised 
for revenue, between 2015 and 2025. 
The reduction to 2021 is 54% which is 
already over the target threshold, albeit 
driven in part by a reduction in volume 
which will in some part reverse as the 
world emerges from the pandemic. We 
will replace this objective by 2023 with a 
science-based target, in line with the 1.5 
degree pathway, in order to continue our 
GHG reduction trajectory through to 2030 
and beyond.
With regard to our Scope 3 emissions, 
we undertook a screening exercise 
in 2021 to identify our most material 
categories for more accurate baselining, 
and incorporation into our science- 
based targets. Our upstream supply 
chain emissions will continue to be a 
particular focus, and we have launched 
projects to define and set near-term 
science-based targets covering this 
category, determining a meaningful and 
actionable baseline, and set a strategy to 
engage with suppliers and set a reduction 
trajectory. We continue to work towards 
making our initial Scope 3 emissions 
disclosures for 2022.
Material use, waste  
and recycling 
In 2021 we renewed our focus on the 
materials and consumables we utilise 
over the lifecycle of our products. 
Our target of reducing total waste to 
landfill by 10% from 2016 levels expired 
at the end of 2021. Although we did see 
an improvement from 37% in 2016 to 32% 
in 2021, we did not achieve the overall 
target set. 
We remain committed to eliminating 
waste to landfill where technically 
feasible, and learning the lessons 
from previous initiatives. During 2022 
a new target will be set renewing our 
waste management targets based on 
reviewing our waste streams in more 
detail, in line with a hierarchical plan to 
improve efficiency of material use across 
our operations: 
•	 Improve the waste management of our 
existing waste streams – increasing the 
recycling rate and setting site targets; 
•	 Review how waste is generated 
in our manufacturing operations 
and look to reduce at source – e.g. 
through use of re-usable packaging, 
advanced machining and additive layer 
manufacturing;
•	 Incorporate material re-usability into 
our design processes, preserving the 
value of the materials we use as far as 
possible for re-use after de-commission 
and disposal; and
•	 Maximise lifecycle utilisation of our 
parts through our Services & Support 
division – for example through “smart 
scoping” in our Maintenance Repair 
and Overhaul (MRO) processes to 
extend the life of our parts and reduce 
the need for replacement.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
80

Some successes realised in 2021 
include our Denmark site where the 
site team identified an opportunity to 
recycle a portion of a production water 
waste stream. 
Our Troy, US, site worked with their 
vendors to identify many waste streams 
that could be recycled instead of 
landfilled. Our Irvine, US, site conducted 
a waste audit involving a number of 
site volunteers – to inspect general 
waste streams, educate and improve 
recycling behaviour.
Water usage
Overall our water usage has increased 
by 11% (21% normalised for revenue) 
between 2020 and 2021, and has also 
increased by 20% since 2016, missing 
our target of a 10% reduction between 
2016 and 2021. The specific rise in 2021 
was partially driven by the transition 
to Ansty Park, with similar levels of 
consumption seen at the legacy and new 
sites as all were operating during the 
transition period. This one-time effect is 
expected to unwind in 2022; without this 
one-off effect, the water consumption 
15%
reduction YoY in Scope 1 & 2 
emissions (location-based)
37%
reduction YoY in Scope 1 & 2 
emissions (market-based)
54%
reduction in Scope 1 & 2 emissions 
against 2015 baseline
Waste to landfill has decreased by 35% since 2016/percentage waste to landfill has reduced from 37% to 32%.
Water purchased (l)
per £1m revenue
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
476 
394 
401 
365 
345 
Waste to landfill as % total waste
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
31.9% 
34.6% 
25.7% 
37.7% 
34.2% 
Waste to landfill (haz vs. non-haz)
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
 152
2,561 
 522
2,884 
 303
4,247 
 250
3,811 
 305
3,815 
Non-hazardous waste to landfill
Hazardous waste to landfill
normalised for revenue would be largely 
flat compared to 2020 and compared 
to 2016. 
Unlike carbon emissions where a tonne 
of GHG emitted anywhere has the same 
effect, our impact on water supply is 
highly dependent on the geographical 
context. Learning the lessons from 
previous water management targets, 
our refreshed approach will concentrate 
on regional regulations and reduction 
targets in the areas of greatest water 
scarcity and issue, to ensure tighter focus 
on our areas of greatest impact.
Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions
(location-based)
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
 26,342
49,066 
 31,042
57,918 
 36,724
73,271 
 36,571
78,055 
 34,495
79,292 
Scope 1 (tonnes CO2e)
Scope 2 (tonnes CO2e)
Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions
(market-based)
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
 26,342
28,668 
 31,042
57,918 
 36,724
73,271 
 36,571
78,055 
 34,495
79,292 
Scope 1 (tonnes CO2e)
Scope 2 (tonnes CO2e)
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
81
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Environmental metrics1 (Table 1)
2021
Change
2020
Utilities
 
 
 
Purchased electricity – gWh 
156 
-8%
170 
MWh per £m revenue
105 
4%
101 
Purchased natural gas – gWh
135 
-15%
158 
MWh per £m revenue
90 
-4%
94 
Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2e) (Scope 1 and 2, location-based reporting) – tonnes 
75,408 
-15%
88,9593 
Tonnes per £m revenue
50.6 
-4%
52.83 
Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2e) (Scope 1 and 2, market-based reporting2) – tonnes
55,010 
-38%
88,9593 
Tonnes per £m revenue
36.9
-33%
52.83 
Waste – tonnes
8,503 
-14%
9,852 
Tonnes per £m revenue
5.7 
-2%
5.9 
Water – cubic metres
708,786 
11%
637,546 
Cubic metres per £m revenue
476 
26%
379 
Targets (Table 2)
 
Baseline year
Five year performance  
period (financial years)
Target improvement over 
performance period
Achieved  
as at 31.12.2021
GHG emissions1,2 – 
relative to revenue
2015
To 31 December 2025
-50%
-54%
Water consumption – 
relative to revenue
2016
To 31 December 2021
-10%
+20%
Waste to landfill – as a % 
of total waste
2016
To 31 December 2021
-10%
-5.4%
GHG emissions data4 (Table 3)
2021 Tonnes of CO2e
2020 Tonnes of CO2e
Scope 1 – Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities
26,342 
31,0423
Scope 22 (market-based) – Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use
28,668 
57,9173 
Scope 2 (location-based) – Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use
49,066 
57,9173 
Total Scope 1 & Scope 2 (market-based) emissions 
 55,010 
 88,9593
Intensity measurement:
 
 
Total Scope 1 and Scope 2 (market-based) emissions reported above, normalised to tonnes  
per £m revenue
36.9 
52.8 
Proportion of emissions and energy usage for UK and offshore area sites (Table 4)
UK and offshore areas
UK % of Group total
Electricity purchased (gWh)
37.3
24
Natural gas purchased (gWh)
44.4
33
Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) greenhouse gas emissions (CO2e, tonnes)
16,104
21
Proportion of Renewable Energy generated and purchased (Table 5)
2021
 
Total electricity consumed by all sites (gWh)
157
Renewable energy generated on-site (gWh)
2
Renewable energy purchased (gWh)
77
Percentage electricity from renewable sources
50%
1 	 Location-based Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are calculated using location-based conversion factors published in the 2020 and 2021 Guidelines to BEIS GHG Conversion Factors for 
Company Reporting for UK locations. Emissions from overseas electricity are calculated using location-based conversion factors published in the IEA Emission factors 2021. Reported as per 
requirements of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008; Scope 1 emissions are conservatively calculated with total consumption of 
natural gas, assuming all combusted – however, a proportion of carbon is captured in solid form within carbon brake discs.
2	 Market-based Scope 2 emissions incorporate market-based reporting, taking into account 100% renewable energy contracts in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, and the purchase of Renewable 
Energy Certificates in California and Kentucky, US.
3	 2020 Scope 1 emissions re-stated to include the consumption of propane gas in carbon brake manufacturing facilities. For clarity, propane gas is included in 2021 data.
4	 Table 3 shows the GHG emissions data required by the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008; The companies for which the GHG data 
is reported here are the same as those consolidated in the Group’s financial statements; Global GHG emissions were calculated using conversion factors published in the Guidelines to BEIS 
GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting and the WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Emissions from overseas electricity are 
calculated using conversion factors published in the IEA Emission factors 2021.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
82

TECHNOLOGY
Decarbonising how we fly is a  
generational challenge that will need  
both nearer-term evolutionary  
developments and more radical  
mid-term changes.
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
83
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Enabling sustainable 
aviation
Improve propulsion system 
efficiency – burn less fuel per unit 
of thrust or power delivered
Reduce aircraft weight – less units  
of thrust required to carry payload
Use of sustainable aviation fuels – 
new fuels with lower greenhouse  
gas emissions
Enabling sustainable  
energy production
Enabling renewable  
power generation
Enabling zero carbon  
power generation
Enabling green hydrogen  
production and/or operation
Reducing emissions through 
improved gas turbine combustion 
efficiency and/or turbine 
performance optimisation
We believe that technology has a critical 
role in making air travel sustainable and 
in transitioning energy systems away 
from fossil fuels. We have committed 
to spend at least two-thirds of our 
investment in innovation in sustainable 
technologies annually. In 2021 actual 
investment was at 81% and we have 
also committed to reducing the 
greenhouse gas emissions from our own 
operations. In 2021 we made a net zero 
commitment that includes developing 
manufacturing technologies that improve 
the environmental impact of our own 
production processes.
Aerospace
Decarbonising how we fly is a generational 
challenge that will need both nearer-term 
evolutionary developments and radical 
mid-term changes.
In the near term we continue to see 
opportunities in improving the efficiencies 
of engines and reducing the weight and 
drag of airframes. The current generation 
of aircraft are already ~15% more efficient 
than those that they are replacing and 
replacement of the older aircraft, due 
to fuel prices and the consequences of 
the COVID-19 pandemic, continues to 
accelerate. Meggitt already has a strong 
position on the majority of the modern 
and fuel-efficient aircraft and engine 
programmes and, as they are further 
developed, our intent is to continue 
partnering with our customers to maintain 
and grow our position. 
In the next few years we expect that 
increasing quantities of sustainable 
aviation fuel (SAF) will be required in 
jet-fuel. SAF will initially be produced 
from biomass and municipal waste and, 
in time, to transition to power-to-liquid 
fuels formed from green hydrogen and 
captured carbon. The speed at which 
SAF production can be brought on-
stream and production costs reduced will 
be critical to the long-term sustainable 
growth of the aviation sector.
Innovating for a sustainable future
As communities, governments and markets around the world increasingly face the 
need to decarbonise how we live, work and travel, Meggitt is committed to developing 
technologies that will support the world’s net zero journey. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
84

Innovation investment in sustainable technologies
Meggitt Technologies
Lighter, more  
efficient aircraft
Next generation  
engines
Sustainable aviation  
fuels (e-fuels, hydrogen)
Thermal systems



Safety systems


Fuel systems


Optical sensing



Engine composites



Braking systems

High temperature systems


Electrical systems


Additive/digital manufacturing



Hydrogen-fuelled aircraft are being 
explored in the industry and many of 
the challenges are around the thermal 
systems where Meggitt has considerable 
capability. However, the challenges of 
operating hydrogen fuel systems in an 
aircraft are significant and we believe 
that hydrogen-fuelled gas turbines may 
offer the most viable solution, although 
the challenges around cryogenic fuel 
storage and the atmospheric impact 
of the water emissions from the aircraft 
still need to be resolved. Meggitt is 
participating in the development of this 
technology but we do not anticipate 
this emerging technology having a 
significant commercial impact in the 
coming decade. 
Electric propulsion is being 
commercialised for a new class of small 
aircraft and Meggitt is playing an active 
part in these programmes. We anticipate 
the first of these new aircraft will enter 
into service in the coming year or two 
and it will be important to see how the 
new airborne mobility sector develops.  
However, limitations in battery power 
density mean that battery-powered 
aircraft will require a further breakthrough 
in battery chemistry before they are 
viable for longer distance air travel and 
we see these new aircraft as developing 
a potentially new mode of short-range 
transport and not replacing existing types 
of aircraft.
The aircraft and engine OEMs continue 
to develop the next generation of 
aircraft and propulsion systems and 
Meggitt is developing technologies 
to support these programmes. 
Some of these technologies include 
additively manufactured thermal system 
components, lightweight composite 
parts, optical and wireless sensing 
solutions, high power density electric 
machines and green fire-suppressants.  
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
85
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Additive Manufacturing ZEROe
Through our partnership with HiETA 
Technologies Limited, we have 
expanded our Additive Manufacturing 
(AM) possibilities.
We use AM to improve the 
performance of our heat exchangers. 
This manufacturing process enables 
us to produce more complex shapes 
than ever before, while enhancing the 
thermal performance by allowing us to 
get more heat transfer surface within a 
smaller volume. 
Meggitt is contributing to the Airbus 
ZEROe demonstrator programme, which 
is developing zero emission aircraft. In 
support of the programme the Meggitt 
Applied Research & Technology team 
and the HiETA engineering teams have 
successfully designed and manufactured 
a world-first additive manufactured heat 
exchanger for the Airbus ZEROe ground 
test rig in less than four weeks. 
The team worked collaboratively 
to produce a range of concepts, 
incorporating novel heat transfer 
surfaces, flow guide vanes and 
optimised structural support. The 
Airbus Design Review was completed 
successfully and the Meggitt team 
started the build the same day! 
This project is testament to the market 
changing dynamics that Additive 
Manufacturing offers as it revolutionises 
the way that products are conceived, 
designed and manufactured. It also 
offers an unrivalled benefit to sustainable 
aviation in its greatly reduced weight 
compared with conventional heat 
exchanger technology thus reducing the 
overall fuel consumption of an aircraft.
Corporate Responsibility
continued
“Additive Manufacturing is enabling smaller and lighter heat 
exchangers than ever before. We are extremely proud to be 
able to support Airbus’s ZEROe programme by producing 
a one-of-a-kind heat exchanger. Developing technologies to 
support sustainable aviation is at the heart of our AR&T strategy. 
Additive Manufacturing is just one of the tools enabling future 
generations of aircraft such as the ZEROe programme.”
1st
climate neutral zero 
emission aircraft
4 weeks
from design and manufacture 
to test rig
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
86

Business conduct
Our CR&S Policy sets out our position in 
relation to conducting all business in a 
manner that achieves sustainable growth 
whilst demonstrating a high degree of 
social responsibility. It aims to balance 
the interests of all our stakeholders 
including shareholders, employees, 
customers, suppliers and the wider 
community in accordance with the law 
and governance, ethics, diversity and the 
environment. At Meggitt, we commit to 
conducting business fairly, impartially, 
and to complying with all applicable laws 
and regulations. Our values of Teamwork, 
Integrity and Excellence are at the heart 
of how we do things and underpin our 
policies which are reinforced by applying 
our High Performance Culture concepts 
throughout the working day. 
After updating our Code of Conduct in 
2020, Meggitt followed this with updates 
to the Financial Crime Policy as well as 
updating and consolidating the Anti-
Corruption and Ethical Business Conduct 
policies. Our policies complement our value 
of Integrity and accompany our standards 
on conducting business fairly and ethically 
under the remit of corporate compliance.
We operate an independently run Speak 
Up Line that enables employees to raise 
questions or concerns anonymously and 
confidentially, 24 hours a day, 7 days a 
week from anywhere in the world. In 2021 
additional work has been conducted with 
the service provider to compile greater 
data analysis of calls enabling us to better 
identify trends and training requirements. 
Contact information for people who can 
help employees if there are any concerns 
is available on our intranet, in all of our 
ethics policies and on posters at all of 
our sites. Our programme continues to 
have daily oversight through the Ethics 
Management Committee, which reviews 
cases to ensure consistent application 
of the process and investigation quality. 
The Committee reviewed trend analysis 
data to ensure additional training 
and coaching was being rolled out in 
the required areas. The results of the 
Committee’s findings were also reported 
to the CR Committee and a process of 
debriefing participants in larger cases 
was included in 2021. Alongside this, 
new training was rolled out in 2021 for 
ethics investigators to ensure a consistent 
approach. A total of 48 employees were 
trained on this process during 2021.
The investigation process is available 
on the intranet to all employees so that 
they are aware of our procedures when 
speaking up and how confidential ethics 
cases and whistleblowing are dealt with. 
All employees are entitled to a thorough 
investigation of concerns raised and 
receive feedback on whether the issues 
are substantiated or not. Our values and 
our High Performance Culture concepts 
underpin our ethics programme with their 
focus on how we treat each other (which 
was the main area for calls received on 
our Speak Up Line in 2021). Each Meggitt 
site has a designated Ethics Champion 
who is available to assist employees with 
questions or concerns, and who also 
attends virtual sessions to share best 
practice, develop skills and identify issues 
and the need for additional training at 
their site. Alongside these practices 
ethical behaviour is also drawn out in our 
Employee Engagement surveys which are 
monitored and impact future strategy.
Compliance training
In addition to the updated Ethical Business 
Conduct Policy and Code of Conduct, we 
continued to promote our ethical business 
conduct through training issued to all 
employees, targeted training delivered 
at specific sites, video messaging to all 
employees and briefings delivered to our 
site-based Ethics Champions. Our training 
reminds employees about ethical business 
conduct, and we provide examples of 
how to apply the principles laid out in our 
policies in the training and reminders of 
help, support and our responsibility in the 
Code itself. In 2021, we provided training 
to all employees on data privacy, health 
and safety, our Code of Conduct, physical 
security and anti-harassment.
Anti-bribery and corruption 
Our Anti-Corruption Policy, which has now 
been updated and consolidated with our 
Ethical Business Conduct Policy, covers 
bribery, gifts and entertainment, conflicts 
of interest, competition and anti-trust, 
operating with intermediaries such as sales 
representatives and distributors, offset 
contracting, political contributions and 
lobbying activities, know your counterparty, 
as well as breaches of the Ethical Business 
Conduct Policy and reporting obligations. 
In addition to the Anti-corruption Policy, we 
also have a Financial Crime Policy covering 
anti-money laundering, fraud prevention 
and corporate tax evasion. Both policies 
set out clear escalation procedures to raise 
concerns through management or via the 
independently run Speak Up hotline as well 
as employee responsibilities. 
Meggitt continued to treat our approach 
to commercial intermediaries as 
extremely important. During 2021 this 
remit was broadened to review all types 
of counterparties within our business 
dealings and now is captured in a “know 
your counterparty” process across the 
business. Our continuous improvement 
plan has strengthened our work with 
independent organisations assessing 
potential country corruption risk, leading 
to enhanced due diligence and alerts in 
our customer relationship management 
tool, which is independently audited. 
Human rights 
Our CR&S Policy covers Human Rights, 
setting out our position in relation to 
conducting our business in the right way. 
We recognise that as a large international 
business, our business operations can 
impact the lives and rights of other people 
(not just our employees). As such, we 
support the Ten Principles of the United 
Nations Global Compact, relating to 
human rights, labour, the environment 
and anti-corruption. Our Code of Conduct 
training also reinforces the behaviour that 
we expect from our employees as well as 
suppliers and contractors. We encourage 
suppliers and contractors to be responsible 
and adhere to our values and principles 
to ensure our business relationships are 
responsible and ethical. We are committed 
to complying with anti-slavery and human-
trafficking legislation and we will continue 
to work with our suppliers to engage on 
this topic. 
Corporate compliance 
and business conduct
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
87
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Corporate Responsibility
continued
Modern slavery
As part of our commitment to acting 
as a responsible supplier, we commit 
to abstaining from practices such as 
slavery, human trafficking, forced labour 
and child labour and reduce offset 
contracting. We also commit to take all 
reasonable measures to ensure that our 
suppliers and other entities acting on our 
behalf do not engage in practices that 
violate applicable laws and regulations 
relating to slavery, human trafficking, 
forced labour and child labour. We ask 
our suppliers to comply with our Code 
of Conduct or similar standards. Steps 
that we are taking to combat modern 
slavery and human trafficking in our 
supply chain are set out in our Modern 
Slavery Statement available on our 
website. Meggitt has implemented a 
framework to mitigate against the risk of 
modern slavery and human trafficking in 
our business and supply chain, including 
annual confirmations of compliance 
with Group policies and procedures, 
strengthened recruitment processes and 
high level engagement with our suppliers 
incorporating clear communication of 
our expectations and regular site visits. 
Taking into account the output from our 
diligence and assurance processes and 
the absence of any concerns highlighted 
in this area the Group considers the risk 
of forced labour in its business and supply 
chain to be low. In addition, during 2021 
Meggitt combined modern slavery efforts 
with the requirements of US legislation on 
the Combatting of Trafficking in Persons 
which has led to a rollout of employee 
and Company obligations, responsibilities 
and renewed ways of working. Further 
information can be found in our Modern 
Slavery Statement on our website. 
Non-financial information 
statement 
The table below summarises where to 
find non-financial information required 
under Section 414C of the Companies 
Act 2006. Our business model on page 
16 summarises the key resources and 
relationships we leverage to generate 
and preserve value. Non-financial key 
performance indicators on page 26 
onwards, allow us to assess progress 
against objectives and monitor the 
development and performance of 
specific areas of the business.
Further information on Group policies 
can be found on our website. 
Related Group policies
Related principal risks 
(pages 50 to 54)
Environmental matters pages 78 to 82
Environmental Policy
Industry Change 
Climate Change 
Business Interruption
Employees pages 72 to 77
Diversity & Inclusion Policy 
Health & Safety Policy
People
Social matters pages 72 to 77
Group Sponsorship and 
Charitable Giving Policy
Business Interruption 
Industry Change
Human rights pages 87 to 88
Corporate Responsibility 
and Sustainability Policy
People 
Supply Chain
Anti-bribery and corruption page 87
Ethical Business Conduct and 
Anti-Bribery & Corruption Policy
Legal & Compliance
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
88

Section 172 statement
In accordance with Section 172 of the 
Companies Act 2006, our Directors must 
act in good faith to promote the success 
of the Company for the benefit of its 
shareholders as a whole. In performing 
this duty, they are required to have 
regard, amongst other things, to the 
interests of employees, the impact of 
our operations on the communities in 
which we operate and the environment, 
and the need to foster relationships 
with our suppliers, customers and other 
key stakeholders in order to maintain a 
reputation for high standards of business 
conduct and enhance the sustainable 
long-term success of the business. 
The Directors give careful consideration 
to these matters when discharging their 
duties and are supported by.
•	 An induction programme and ongoing 
briefings, visits and discussions to 
ensure that they understand the 
business including our markets, future 
prospects, and environmental and 
wider stakeholder impacts.
•	 A formalised procedure which 
highlights the impact of important 
decisions on key stakeholders to assist 
the assessment of Section 172 impacts. 
This formalised approach embeds the 
consideration of stakeholder interests 
during the decision-making process.
•	 Carefully planned agendas to ensure 
the Board and its Committees have 
sufficient time to consider and discuss 
key matters.
Business conduct 
As explained on page 105 the day-to-
day management of the business is 
delegated to the executive management 
team. The principles underpinning 
Section 172 of the Companies Act are 
not only considered at Board level 
but are an integral part of our Group’s 
culture. Our Corporate Responsibility and 
Sustainability Policy requires our business 
to be conducted in a manner that 
achieves sustainable growth by balancing 
the interests of all stakeholders. This 
Policy prompts consideration of the 
matters set out in Section 172 during the 
decision-making process undertaken at 
all levels of the business. Through this 
Policy we ensure that the business is run 
with regard to our stakeholders.
Our comprehensive ethics programme, 
which includes an independently run 
whistleblowing hotline, promotes high 
standards of business conduct across the 
Group. The programme is monitored by 
the Board on a quarterly basis and by the 
Corporate Responsibility Committee at a 
more detailed level at each meeting. It is 
reinforced through our policies, regular 
ethics training and our values and High 
Performance Culture programme. To 
date, [6,315] of our current employees 
have attended High Performance 
Culture “unfreezing” sessions including 
the Board who participated in sessions 
in 2019.
Our Group Environmental Policy sets 
out our commitment to incorporate 
environmental considerations in all 
aspects of our business. See page 79 
for further details. 
Depending on the subject matter, the 
relevance of each stakeholder group may 
differ and decisions will not always result 
in a positive outcome for all stakeholders. 
But by having due regard to the interests 
of our key stakeholders at each decision-
making level of the business we ensure 
that key decisions taken promote 
the long-term sustainable success of 
the Group.
Engagement and decision-making
How we engage with 
our stakeholders
The Board has identified our key 
stakeholders as: our workforce, 
shareholders, customers, suppliers, 
and the communities within which we 
operate. Management conduct much 
of the primary engagement activities 
and present regular updates to the 
Board, providing critical insights and 
perspectives to shape Board decisions 
and enable effective challenge of 
decisions taken by management on 
behalf of the Board.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
89
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Stakeholder
How we engage at 
Board level
Further engagement 
activities
What matters 
to them
Governance 
in action
Workforce
Building a safe, 
healthy and 
happy work 
environment 
helps our 
workforce reach 
their full potential 
and strengthens 
our business.
Nancy Gioia, Chair of the 
Corporate Responsibility 
Committee and the Non-
Executive Director responsible 
for employee engagement, 
led a programme of employee 
engagement activities 
throughout the year. This 
included the independent 
Non-Executive Directors 
mentoring a member of the 
senior management team 
and remotely participating in 
various employee engagement 
activities. Further details of 
our employee engagement 
programme during 2021 can be 
found on page 92. 
Early in 2021, our Chief 
Executive conducted over 50 
remote Town Halls with teams 
across the globe, representing 
a cross section of employees 
from all levels of the business, 
to obtain a direct pulse from 
employees on key matters that 
interest them. Themes from 
these Town Halls were reported 
back to the Board.
Annual employee 
engagement surveys and 
annual “pulse” surveys are 
issued to employees with 
the results reported to and 
discussed by the Board.
Intranet updates and 
leadership blogs provide 
employees with key 
information and achieve 
a common awareness of 
the financial and economic 
factors affecting the Group’s 
performance.
Members of senior 
management participate 
in Board and Committee 
meetings. 
An independently run 
whistleblowing hotline is in 
place with regular reports to 
the Corporate Responsibility 
Committee and the Board.
Interests relate to: 
•	 Personal development, 
progression opportunities 
and pay reviews/rises.
•	 Retention of key talent.
•	 Employee wellbeing and 
mental health.
•	 Clarity on future flexible 
working arrangements.
•	 The impact of the proposed 
acquisition by Parker-
Hannifin on the workforce.
•	 The future of flying/civil 
aerospace especially bearing 
in mind the impacts of 
climate change.
•	 The future of defence 
spending.
To sustain morale and retention 
and respond to feedback from 
our workforce we:
•	 Issued a global (but locally 
variable %) pay rise in 
October 2021.
•	 Committed to return to the 
normal pay review process in 
April 2022.
•	 Released a policy statement 
and global guidelines on 
flexible working.
•	 Released a new mental 
health and wellbeing policy. 
•	 Continued to update our 
workforce on factors 
affecting our business via 
intranet updates and 
leadership blogs.
•	 Communicated with 
employees on the proposed 
acquisition by Parker-
Hannifin, with 
communications linked to 
major milestones owing to 
regulatory restrictions on 
what we can say.
Shareholders
Securing our 
shareholders’ 
trust through 
continuous 
engagement 
ensures their 
ongoing 
investment and 
support.
The Chief Executive and Chief 
Financial Officer, together with 
our VP Investor Relations meet 
regularly with key shareholders 
and report back to the Board.
The Chairman met with some 
of our key shareholders during 
the year on matters related to 
governance.
In early 2021, the Chair of the 
Remuneration Committee 
continued engagement with 
our major shareholders, and 
proxy advisors, to discuss 
and seek feedback on 
remuneration proposals which 
cumulated in the approval of 
the Remuneration Policy at the 
2021 Annual General Meeting. 
The Chair of the Audit 
Committee will seek 
engagement with shareholders 
on significant matters related 
to the Committee’s area 
of responsibility as and 
when applicable.
The Company Secretary 
and VP Investor Relations 
engaged with our major 
shareholders and proxy 
advisors ahead of and after 
the Annual General Meeting 
to answer questions on the 
resolutions and report key 
themes back to the Board.
Last year’s Annual General 
Meeting was held as a hybrid 
meeting to facilitate greater 
shareholder engagement 
and participation by allowing 
shareholders to attend, speak 
and vote at the meeting 
virtually.
The General Meeting 
and Court Meeting for 
shareholders to approve the 
offer from Parker-Hannifin 
were also held as hybrid 
meetings to maximise 
shareholder participation 
and engagement.
Interests relate to:
•	 Strategy and performance, 
financial returns and 
dividends. 
•	 Availability of our Non-
Executive Directors to 
discharge their duties 
effectively.
•	 Gender and ethnic 
diversity at Board and 
senior management level.
•	 How effectively the 
Company is managing risks 
and pursuing opportunities 
including in relation to 
climate change.
•	 Directors’ remuneration.
•	 The Directors’ authority to 
allot shares in the Company. 
Our dividend decision-making 
process balances the desire 
of shareholders for immediate 
returns, against the need to 
maintain a robust balance 
sheet and manage cash flow. 
It is in this context, and the 
subsequent offer from Parker-
Hannifin, that the Board did not 
make or propose a dividend 
in 2021.
We maintain robust processes to 
monitor the time-commitments 
of our Non-Executive Directors 
and conduct annual evaluations 
to ensure that they continue to 
be effective and discharge their 
duties properly. More information 
is available on page 110.
We are mindful of the 
increasing interest in climate 
change and have focused on 
improving our disclosures on 
this topic so that shareholders 
are better informed on how 
we manage risk and pursue 
opportunities in this area. 
Further details can be found 
on pages 58 to 63.
At the 2021 Annual General 
Meeting we received more 
than 20% of votes against 
the resolutions to approve 
the Remuneration Policy and 
to authorise the Directors to 
allot shares in the Company. 
Further details can be found 
on page 113.
Stakeholder engagement
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
90

Stakeholder
How we engage at 
Board level
Further engagement 
activities
What matters 
to them
Governance 
in action
Customers
Understanding 
our customers’ 
priorities is 
imperative to 
meeting their 
needs.
Continuous engagement by our 
CEO and divisional presidents 
and product group teams 
to discuss performance and 
technologies. 
The Board receives regular 
reports on customers, 
customer-related key 
performance indicators, 
and ongoing actions to 
improve performance.
The Group’s Services & 
Support division is entirely 
focused on civil and defence 
aerospace aftermarket 
customer service. The 
Board receives regular 
updates on the division’s 
progress from the CEO and 
an annual update from the 
divisional president. 
Customers are invited for 
site visits and to speak at 
leadership conferences 
to strengthen our 
collaborative relationships. 
Interests relate to:
•	 Product value and quality.
•	 On time delivery.
•	 Excellent customer service 
and support.
•	 Innovative and sustainable 
technologies.
•	 Strong, collaborative 
relationships.
•	 Sustainability.
•	 Ethical conduct and 
behaviour with increased 
focus on human trafficking 
and modern slavery.
The Meggitt High Performance 
System (HPS) provides 
continuous improvement to our 
manufacturing processes for 
the benefit of our customers. 
HPS measures are included 
in the Long Term Incentive 
Plan and progress with HPS is 
discussed by the Board and 
Remuneration Committee. 
We hold monthly leadership 
meetings with a consistent 
focus on our customers and 
performance. We also meet 
with customers to discuss 
technology road maps.
We share our customers’ 
commitment to sustainability 
and have signed up to the 
United Nations’ Race to Zero 
campaign. Further details can 
be found on page 79.
We are committed to 
conducting our business in an 
ethical manner. During 2021 
we revised and merged our 
Ethical Business Conduct and 
Anti-Bribery and Corruption 
policies and introduced a 
new compliance plan to 
combat human trafficking and 
modern slavery.
We regularly monitor customer 
scorecards and ensure 
responsiveness to issues via the 
Voice of the Customer process. 
Suppliers
Strong 
relationships 
with our supply 
base enhance our 
effectiveness and 
profitability. 
The Corporate Responsibility 
Committee receives 
regular updates on supplier 
engagement activities from 
our Chief Procurement Officer, 
which is reported back to 
the Board.
The Corporate Responsibility 
Committee monitors the 
communication channels 
and relationships with our 
suppliers to ensure that they 
facilitate open discussion on 
areas of concern and support 
best practice.
Payment practices are 
managed by the Chief Financial 
Officer and Chief Procurement 
Officer who monitor actions to 
improve payments to suppliers. 
The Board and Corporate 
Responsibility Committee also 
receive biannual updates on 
payment practices.
Our requirements for 
suppliers to demonstrate 
compliance to industry-wide 
policies regarding quality, 
security and a wide range of 
corporate social responsibility 
matters including 
environmental performance, 
modern slavery and human 
trafficking and conflict 
minerals are documented 
and made available to our 
suppliers. The requirements 
are included in our standard 
terms and conditions.
Supplier risk assessments 
are undertaken and we 
engage with those suppliers 
perceived to be higher 
risk to seek confirmation 
of compliance on certain 
matters.
We also conduct site visits of 
our suppliers’ facilities. 
Interests relate to: 
•	 Being treated fairly during 
the sourcing stage.
•	 Solid two-way 
communication channels.
•	 Timely financial payments.
•	 Strong, collaborative 
relationships. 
Our supplier development 
process enables suppliers 
to feed back comments and 
if necessary seek our help 
to resolve systemic issues. 
Through this process we have 
achieved an overall reduction 
in total supplier responsible 
quality escapes of more 
than 10%.
We have taken actions to 
improve our Pay on Time 
performance with increased 
focus on addressing 
bottlenecks and using metrics 
to identify and address 
underlying causes. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
91
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
Stakeholder engagement
continued
Stakeholder
How we engage at 
Board level
Further engagement 
activities
What matters 
to them
Governance 
in action
Local 
communities
Our relationships 
with the 
communities close 
to our sites are 
vital; we build 
trust through 
local dialogue.
The Board approves 
the Group’s Corporate 
Responsibility and Sustainability 
Policy which sets out our 
commitment to encourage 
employees to help community 
organisations and charities, 
provide financial or in-kind 
resources to organisations and 
projects with a community 
benefit and support local 
schools, colleges and 
universities for the benefit of 
our communities.
Our approach to local 
communities, charities and 
implementation of the Group’s 
Sponsorship and Charitable 
Giving Policy is discussed at 
each Corporate Responsibility 
Committee meeting.
The Board is kept up to date 
with community projects 
on a regular basis through 
the CEO’s report and 
updates from the Corporate 
Responsibility Committee.
We monitor the 
environmental impact of our 
facilities and agree targets on 
greenhouse gas emissions, 
water and waste.
Our site managers and their 
teams engage with their 
local communities to provide 
support in line with our 
Corporate Responsibility and 
Sustainability Policy. 
We maintain an active 
external communications 
programme through social 
media to communicate 
key messages and monitor 
comments about the Group. 
Regular social media updates 
are provided to executive 
management.
•	 Responsiveness to local 
concerns.
•	 Ongoing open dialogue.
•	 Our impact on the local 
environment.
•	 Local jobs.
•	 Local contributions (skills or 
financial donations).
As part of Earth Day in April 
2021, many of our sites across 
the globe planted trees at their 
facilities, or at a local school 
or park as part of our efforts 
to promote responsible use of 
natural resources and to further 
the advancement of sustainable 
practices across the Group.
In July 2021 we launched our 
Community Heroes scheme 
which enables our colleagues 
to give their time to worthy 
causes. Further details can be 
found on page 76. 
Implementing site level key 
performance indicators and 
targets for environmental 
measures such as energy and 
water consumption and waste 
to landfill.
Employee engagement 
With the continuation of COVID-19 
travel restrictions in 2021 and the impact 
of a challenging trading backdrop, 
my engagement strategy focused on 
delivering to the best extent possible 
a rounded view of what is top of mind 
of Meggitt employees. Although in 
person visits were not possible for the 
majority of the year, video chats with 
employees, either one-on-one or as a 
small group, proved to be very effective. 
Additionally, I was pleased that the use 
of video enabled the continued and 
expanded involvement of my Non-
Executive Director colleagues in the 2021 
programme. This enabled us to cover 
more ground and broadened board 
exposure to direct employee feedback.  
Key engagement undertaken in 2021 and 
early 2022 include: 
•	 Virtual engagements – supported by 
my Non-Executive Director colleagues, 
virtual engagements have been 
conducted with our sites in Xiamen, 
China and Stevenage, UK and with 
individuals from different levels of the 
following functions: Finance and IT, 
Commercial and Corporate Affairs, HR, 
Engineering and Operations. I also 
conducted virtual engagement with the 
ERG leads and HPC facilitators. 
•	 Site visit – with the easing of lockdown 
restrictions I was able to visit our 
Airframe Systems site in Oregon where 
I was able to meet and speak with the 
local workforce.
•	 Ethical engagement – detailed 
engagement with the Group 
Company Secretary & EVP Ethics 
and Communications and the Group 
Director, Corporate Compliance, 
Ethics & Corporate Responsibility, 
in which we were able to discuss 
specific ethics cases and themes, and 
improvement work being undertaken 
on the ethics programme.
•	 Graduate engagement – Colin Day and 
I conducted virtual engagement with a 
small group of graduates to get a feel 
on the matters of importance to them.  
•	 Mentoring – my Non-Executive 
Director colleagues and I held one-
on-one discussions on careers and 
personal development with selected 
high potential employees. 
•	 Career talks – Alison Goligher attended 
a Women in Engineering event hosted 
by our STEM/PAVE Employee Resource 
Groups to speak about her career 
in engineering, and Caroline Silver 
attended our leadership conference 
to discuss her background in finance 
and how it supports her role as a Non-
Executive Director of the Company.   
General feedback themes included: the 
proposed acquisition by Parker-Hannifin; 
the importance of the High Performance 
Culture programme and the challenges 
in embedding the programme during 
the COVID-19 pandemic; the value 
employees placed on inclusion activities 
undertaken throughout the Group and 
what more could be done to support 
activities for shopfloor employees in 
future; graduate retention; flexibility and 
working from home arrangements; the 
senior management team communicates 
and listens well to employees.   
Feedback from these activities was 
provided to the Board in February 2022 
and will help shape future decisions.
Nancy Gioia
Non-Executive Director responsible for 
employee engagement
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
92

During the year, the Board and its 
Committees made decisions to 
strengthen our governance framework, 
implement our strategy and generate 
the best returns for our shareholders. 
The different interests of our stakeholder 
groups, and the impact of decisions 
upon them, were considered during 
the decision-making process. In some 
cases, the interests of stakeholder 
groups conflicted, and the Board and its 
Committees had to assess these conflicts 
and attempt to balance them in their 
decision-making.
Key
	
Likely consequences of our 
decisions in the long term
	
The interests of our workforce
	
The need to foster relationships 
with our suppliers, customers 
and others
	
Impact of our operations on the 
community and environment
	
Maintaining a reputation for high 
standards of business conduct
	
The need to act fairly between 
our shareholders 
Decision – Disposal of  
the Airframe Systems 
Toulouse business
1  2  3  4  5
Key considerations
•	 The Toulouse site was not achieving 
its financial targets and had not been 
prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. 
Consideration was given to closing or 
selling the site.
•	 The site’s financial performance had 
led to a high level of uncertainty and 
anxiety amongst the local workforce, 
which was compounded by the 
COVID-19 pandemic. The workforce 
therefore sought clear direction for the 
future of the site. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
•	 Closing the site would make the 
entire workforce redundant, with 
poor prospects of employment 
in other Meggitt sites due to the 
physical location and hiring freeze 
implemented in response to COVID-19. 
The local labour market had also been 
significantly impacted by COVID-19 
meaning potentially poor prospects 
for alternative employment elsewhere. 
A site closure would therefore likely 
have a significant impact on the local 
community. Alternatively, a buyer 
would retain a significant portion of 
the workforce and Meggitt would offer 
enhanced redundancy terms to those 
who would not be retained.
•	 In the case of a site closure, the 
manufacturing activity would transfer 
to other Meggitt sites, carrying a high 
level of risk for customers arising from 
the loss of legacy knowledge of the 
Toulouse employees. A sale of the 
site would mean a smoother transition 
for customers but would mean them 
accepting a new supplier which would 
carry continuity risk given that the 
prospective buyers were smaller than 
Meggitt and thus more susceptible 
to economic pressure resulting from 
COVID-19.  
•	 External legal advice was sought to 
ensure compliance with applicable 
labour laws and maintain our 
reputation for high standards of 
business conduct. 
Stakeholder engagement
•	 The workforce was informed of the 
proposals and was updated regularly 
on developments. 
•	 Regular meetings with the employee 
work council encouraged a high level 
of trust and transparency despite the 
highly sensitive nature of the discussions. 
•	 All affected customers had been 
informed of the proposal and were 
kept engaged by local management 
throughout the process.
Outcome
•	 Significant effort was made in finding 
a suitable buyer for the business. 
Due diligence was conducted 
on all potential buyers to ensure 
the business was transferred to a 
suitable custodian.
•	 The business was sold to Domusa, 
with final approval of the transaction 
delegated to the Board’s Finance 
Committee. The sale helped progress 
the Group’s footprint consolidation 
strategy and enable more efficient 
use of shareholder investment to 
maximise long-term returns.
•	 The high level of transparency with 
the workforce and clarity as to the 
site’s future alleviated workforce 
anxiety and allowed those who 
would not be retained to plan for 
future employment. 
•	 Transparency and engagement with 
our customers helped maintain trust 
and our reputation for high standards 
of business conduct. 
•	 The majority of roles were retained 
by Domusa, minimising the number 
of redundancies and the overall 
impact on the local community. 
Enhanced redundancy terms were 
offered to those who lost their roles 
as a result of the sale, maintaining 
Meggitt’s reputation for treating its 
workforce fairly. 
Decision – Supporting and 
recommending to shareholders 
Parker-Hannifin’s offer of 800 
pence per Meggitt share 
1  2  3  4  5  6
Key considerations  
•	 Meggitt had a compelling standalone 
strategy which would deliver attractive 
value for shareholders over time as 
the Group’s key markets recovered 
from the impact of COVID-19. At 
the same time, there was significant 
uncertainty as to the precise 
timing and speed of recovery and 
Parker-Hannifin’s cash offer would 
substantially accelerate delivery of 
value to shareholders at a substantial 
premium to the then prevailing 
market price of Meggitt shares.
Decision-making in practice
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
93
Strategic Report

Strategic Report
•	 The need to generate the best value for 
shareholders while ensuring that other 
stakeholder interests (including those of 
the Group’s key customers) are protected. 
•	 The need to comply with all applicable 
laws, regulations and contractual 
obligations to maintain our reputation 
for high standards of business conduct. 
•	 The need to incentivise and retain key 
members of staff, especially those at 
greater risk of being made redundant 
or who would play key roles in 
the transaction. 
•	 The combination of Meggitt and Parker-
Hannifin may give rise to operational 
economies of scale which could result in 
headcount reductions or the relocation of 
Meggitt employees, particularly those in 
central corporate functions. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin’s highly regarded 
reputation and acquisition experience 
suggested that the Meggitt businesses 
would continue to thrive within the 
Parker-Hannifin Group. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin’s enhanced access 
to capital would enable it to invest in 
Meggitt’s long-term programmes and 
benefit from the sharing of technology. 
The integration of the businesses 
would likely benefit our customers by 
creating scale and an ability to take 
on more technical and commercial risk 
in developing products and systems 
especially relating to sustainable 
technologies required for the future. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin could leverage its 
enhanced scale to negotiate more 
favourable terms with suppliers 
and customers. 
•	 The importance of Meggitt’s rich UK 
heritage and its customer relationship 
with the UK Government, and the need 
to secure binding commitments to 
protect its interests. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin’s reputation for 
supporting its local communities and its 
generous charitable giving campaigns 
meant that Meggitt’s local communities 
would likely be well supported 
following the proposed acquisition. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin’s commitment 
to mitigating its impact on the 
environment and implementing 
creative solutions to reduce their 
energy consumption and emissions 
complemented Meggitt’s sustainable 
aviation strategy. The scale of the 
combined business would enable it to 
take on greater risk and develop more 
sustainable products at a faster pace.
Stakeholder engagement
•	 Meggitt provided Parker-Hannifin 
with due diligence information and 
held extensive discussions to secure 
commitments to Meggitt’s business, 
employees, pension schemes and the 
UK Government. 
•	 Meggitt undertook due diligence on 
Parker-Hannifin to ensure that it would 
be a good long-term owner of the 
Group’s business. 
•	 Meggitt continues to engage 
extensively with advisors and relevant 
regulators to obtain all required 
approvals and ensure that all 
applicable laws and regulations are 
complied with. 
•	 Meggitt held a hybrid Court and 
General meeting to approve the 
transaction. The hybrid nature of 
the meetings facilitated greater 
shareholder participation and 
engagement by allowing shareholders 
to attend, ask questions and vote at the 
meeting either in person or virtually. 
•	 Meggitt engaged on a constructive 
basis with TransDigm and its advisors 
in order to facilitate an offer by 
TransDigm following its expression 
of interest at 900 pence per share. 
Meggitt provided TransDigm and 
Parker­-Hannifin with equivalent access 
to both due diligence information and 
management and in response to a 
request from TransDigm, further due 
diligence information was provided to 
both TransDigm and Parker-Hannifin 
after the announcement of Parker­
Hannifin’s cash offer. 
•	 Communications were issued 
after the announcement of Parker­-
-Hannifin’s cash offer to inform Group 
employees, the trustees of Meggitt’s 
pension schemes and Meggitt’s 
shareholders and share option holders. 
Further communications were sent 
to participants in the Group’s share 
incentive schemes to explain how the 
proposed acquisition would impact 
them and the steps they would need 
to take, if any, to realise value from 
their entitlements.
Outcome
•	 Shareholders approved the 800 pence 
cash offer from Parker-Hannifin on 
21 September 2021. The proposed 
acquisition is currently subject to 
various regulatory approvals and is 
expected to complete in Q3 2022. 
•	 Where possible, the new combined 
Group will seek to reallocate staff 
from discontinued roles arising from 
the transaction to other appropriate 
roles. Furthermore, Parker-Hannifin 
has provided binding commitments to 
the effect that assuming an ordinary 
course of business environment, it 
will maintain Meggitt’s existing R&D, 
product engineering, and direct 
manufacturing labour headcount in 
the UK at no less than current levels 
and will increase by at least 10% the 
number of overall apprenticeship 
opportunities currently offered by 
Meggitt in the UK. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin has also held 
constructive discussions with the 
trustee of the UK Meggitt Pension Plan 
and has entered into a memorandum 
of understanding to set out its intention 
with respect to the future funding of 
the Plan. 
•	 Tailored incentive and retention 
mechanisms have been deployed to 
those in critical roles to ensure that 
they do not leave the business before 
the deal is completed and to maintain 
talent in the business until a proper 
evaluation can be undertaken by 
Parker-Hannifin. 
•	 Parker-Hannifin announced its intention 
to safeguard the existing employment 
rights of the management and 
employees of the Combined Group 
in accordance with applicable law and 
confirmed that it does not envisage any 
material change in their conditions of 
employment.
Strategic Report 
This Strategic Report comprising pages 
08 to 94 has been approved by the Board 
and is signed on its behalf by.
Tony Wood
Chief Executive Officer
Stakeholder engagement
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
94

Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
95
Strategic Report

DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT
Chairman’s introduction to Governance
98
Board of Directors
100
Corporate Governance
104
Audit Committee report
114
Nominations Committee report
122
Directors’ remuneration report
126
Other statutory information
156
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
96

Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
97
Directors’ Report

Directors’ Report
Chairman’s introduction
We uphold the highest standards of corporate governance and 
business conduct that underpin successful and sustainable long-
term businesses. We remain accountable to our shareholders, whilst 
recognising the value of strong relationships with our workforce 
and wider stakeholders built on a culture of openness and trust.
Governance highlights in 2021
•	 Ongoing oversight of the business 
response to COVID-19. 
•	 Leading the strategy and response 
in respect of Parker-Hannifin’s and 
TransDigm’s interest in Meggitt.  
•	 Setting the Group’s strategy and plan.
•	 Additional Remuneration Committee 
meetings to consider the impact of 
the all-cash offer from Parker-Hannifin 
on the Group’s outstanding share 
schemes and incentives to mitigate the 
increased retention risk arising from 
the offer. 
•	 We maintained a robust schedule of 
employee engagement activities to 
better understand and address key 
issues raised by employees including 
the impact of the all-cash offer from 
Parker-Hannifin on the workforce. 
More details on employee engagement 
activities can be found on page 92.
•	 The appointment of Alison Goligher 
as Senior Independent Director from 
the date of the 2021 Annual General 
Meeting and a review of Guy Berruyer’s 
independence following the conclusion 
of his third three-year term. 
2021 Board attendance
Sir Nigel Rudd1
Chairman
Mr A Wood2
Chief Executive
Mr G S Berruyer
Non-Executive 
Director
Mrs L S Burdett2
Chief Financial 
Officer
Mr C R Day2
Non-Executive 
Director
Mrs N L Gioia
Non-Executive 
Director
Ms A J P Goligher
Non-Executive 
Director
Mr G C Hachey2
Non-Executive 
Director
Mrs C L Silver2
Non-Executive 
Director
  7 Scheduled meetings
  18 Additional meetings
 
 Meetings attended  
  Non-attendance
 
1 	 Met the independence criteria on appointment as 
Chairman on 23 April 2015.
2	 Unable to attend additional meetings due to prior 
commitments. Many additional meetings were 
convened at short notice, where possible the 
Chairman sought the views of Directors not able to 
attend in advance of the meetings and fed these 
back to the Board.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
98

Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board I am pleased 
to present the Corporate governance 
report for the year ended 31 December 
2021. This report describes Meggitt’s 
governance structures and procedures, 
and summarises the work of the Board 
and its Committees to illustrate how 
we have discharged our responsibilities 
this year.
The COVID-19 pandemic continued to 
impact the way we worked throughout 
the year with meetings conducted 
remotely to accommodate attendance 
during various lockdowns and periods of 
travel restrictions, although I am pleased 
that I and other Board members were 
physically able to attend some meetings 
during the year. 
In addition to seven scheduled Board 
meetings, we held 18 additional Board 
meetings in 2021 to support and 
guide senior management and give 
due consideration to the all-cash offer 
from Parker-Hannifin and TransDigm’s 
expressed interest in the Group. 
I am proud of the Board’s dynamic and 
agile response to these events and I 
thank my Board colleagues for their 
flexibility and outstanding support 
throughout the year, particularly as some 
of the additional meetings were called at 
short notice and at unsociable hours.
Board composition
Continuity of leadership has been a 
key focus during the pandemic and will 
continue to be so up to the anticipated 
completion date of the proposed 
acquisition by Parker-Hannifin. I believe 
that the Board has the right balance 
of skills and expertise to successfully 
guide the Company through continued 
challenges presented by COVID-19 and 
the proposed acquisition by Parker-
Hannifin, and that changes to the Board 
composition during the year would have 
detracted from these critical focus areas. 
Whilst regrettable that we were not able 
to strengthen the diversity of our Board 
during the year, I believe that our focus 
on continuity has enabled the Group to 
respond well to the challenges of the 
pandemic and the all-cash offer from 
Parker-Hannifin. Further details on the 
Board’s skills and experience can be 
found on page 123.
Purpose, values and culture
Our culture is important to us, it’s what 
makes us who we are. We monitor our 
culture to ensure that it remains aligned 
with our purpose and values. Details of 
how we monitor culture can be found on 
page 107.
In addition to the financial terms of 
Parker-Hannifin’s all-cash offer, we 
carefully considered Parker-Hannifin’s 
values, culture, plans for Meggitt’s 
business and the impact of the proposed 
acquisition on our key stakeholders. 
Further details on the process the Board 
followed and the matters it considered 
when considering the Parker-Hannifin 
offer can be found in the case study on 
pages 93 and 94.
UK Corporate Governance 
Code 
This report explains how the Group 
has applied the principles of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code (the 
2018 Code) and how our governance 
framework supports delivery of our 
strategy as set out on pages 24 and 25.
Sir Nigel Rudd
Chairman of the Board of Directors
2 March 2022
In this section
Board of Directors
This introduces our individual Board 
members by providing details of the skills 
and experience they bring to the Board 
and the Committees on which they serve. 
Page100
Corporate governance report
The Corporate governance report 
analyses the leadership provided by the 
Board, the steps taken to ensure that the 
Board is effective and the frameworks by 
which the Board manages relationships 
with shareholders.
Page104
Audit Committee report
Introduced by its Chair, Colin Day, this 
report describes the Audit Committee’s 
work during the year by reference to 
the principal responsibilities of the 
Committee for financial reporting, 
external audit, the risk management 
process, internal controls and 
internal audit. 
Page114
Nominations Committee report
Introduced by its Chair, Sir Nigel Rudd, 
this report outlines the Committee’s 
philosophy on appointments and diversity 
and describes the activities of the 
Committee during the year. 
Page122
Directors’ remuneration report
Introduced by its Chair, Alison Goligher, 
this report summarises the Committee’s 
approach to remuneration and its link 
with our strategy.
Page126
Other statutory information
This section sets out other information  
we are required to disclose in  
accordance with Section 415  
of the Companies Act 2006.
Page156
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
99
Directors’ Report

Board of Directors
Sir Nigel Rudd DL
Non-Executive Chairman 
Appointed: 2015 
Nationality: British
Whilst Sir Nigel had confirmed his intention 
to retire from the Board in 2019, which was 
subsequently delayed owing to the significant 
impact of COVID-19 on the Group, the Board 
believes that there is significant benefit in 
continuity of leadership as the proposed 
acquisition by Parker-Hannifin progresses. 
Skills and experience 
Chartered accountant with extensive board 
experience spanning multiple sectors including 
aerospace, retail and financial services.
Sir Nigel plays a critical role in leading the 
Board and the Nominations Committee 
and brings decades of executive leadership 
and chairmanship experience across many 
industrial companies, including aerospace 
and defence, and other complex sectors. His 
commercial, financial and business acumen 
and strong shareholder focus are extremely 
valuable to the Board and have played a key 
role during the acquisition process. 
Current appointments
Non-Executive Chairman of Sappi Limited.
Appointments in unlisted companies 
Director of iPulse Limited and iPulse 
Direct Limited.
Previous appointments
Chairman of Signature Aviation plc and 
Williams Holdings plc, Destiny Pharma PLC, 
Kidde plc, Heathrow Airport Holdings Limited 
(formerly BAA Limited), The Boots Company, 
Pilkington PLC, Pendragon PLC, Invensys 
plc, Aquarius Platinum Limited and BGF PLC. 
Deputy Chairman of Barclays PLC and Non-
Executive Director of BAE Systems plc.
Committee membership
N
Tony Wood
Chief Executive 
Appointed: 2016 (appointed as  
CEO: 2018) 
Nationality: British
Skills and experience
Extensive aerospace industry experience 
gained with Rolls-Royce plc where he held 
a number of senior management positions, 
latterly as President, Aerospace. Previously 
spent 16 years at Messier-Dowty, now part of 
Safran Group.
Tony’s significant operational experience in 
aerospace and defence and other industrial 
sectors, strong customer relationships and 
strategic oversight of the Group are critical 
to the Board as the business benefits from 
the recovery in the civil aerospace market. 
His experience of leading cultural change in 
previous roles has brought the Group’s culture 
into focus and created a cooperative and 
collaborative workforce to execute the Group’s 
strategic objectives. 
Current appointments
Non-Executive Director of National Grid plc 
and member of the People & Governance and 
Safety & Sustainability Committees.
Organisations
Director of ADS, the UK trade organisation 
representing the aerospace, defence, security 
and space sectors. Fellow of the Royal 
Aeronautical Society and Association for 
Project Management (APM).
Committee membership
C  F  D
Committee membership
A   Audit
N   Nominations
R   Remuneration
C   Corporate Responsibility
F   Finance
D   Disclosure
  Denotes Chairman
Directors’ Report
Providing expert 
skills and experience 
to create and deliver 
sustainable value 
and promote the 
long-term success 
of the Group.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
100

Guy Berruyer
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed: 2012 
Nationality: French
Guy reached the conclusion of his nine-year 
term in October 2021. The Board reviewed 
this position in 2021, and considered that it 
was important both to ensure continuity on 
the Board and to secure continued input from 
a valued Board member, during a period of 
ongoing uncertainty as a result of COVID-19 
and the proposed acquisition by Parker-
Hannifin. The Board is satisfied that Guy 
continues to be independent and proposes his 
re-election as an independent Non-Executive 
Director. 
Skills and experience
Trained as an electrical engineer at the École 
Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and 
holds a Harvard Business School MBA. Guy has 
extensive international leadership experience 
and as former Chief Executive of a FTSE 100 
plc, he brings significant insight, challenge and 
expertise to Board and Committee discussions.
Appointments in unlisted companies
Non-Executive Director of Civica Group. 
Chairman of the Supervisory Committee of 
DL Software.
Previous appointments
Group Chief Executive of The Sage Group 
plc and Chief Executive of Sage Group plc’s 
Europe and Asia division. Early career spent 
with software and hardware vendors in French 
and other European management roles. 
Non-Executive Chairman of Brandwatch, a 
digital consumer intelligence company. Non-
Executive Director of Berger Levrault, a French 
software and services company.
Committee membership
A  N  R  C
Louisa Burdett
Chief Financial Officer 
Appointed: 2019 
Nationality: British
Skills and experience 
Chartered accountant who has held senior 
financial positions in industrial, manufacturing, 
publishing and pharmaceutical companies.
Louisa brings solid financial, commercial and 
M&A experience across a broad range of 
sectors, including aerospace. This has been 
key as the Group took decisive action to deal 
with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic 
and in discussions regarding the proposed 
acquisition by Parker-Hannifin. 
Current appointments
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit 
Committee of Electrocomponents plc, a global 
distributor of industrial and electronic products.
Organisations
Member of the Institute of Chartered 
Accountants in England and Wales.
Previous appointments
Chief Financial Officer of Victrex plc. CFO roles 
with Optos plc, the Financial Times Group, 
GE Healthcare and Chep Europe. She also 
spent time in various roles at GlaxoSmithKline, 
including Finance Integration Director.
Committee membership
C  F  D
Colin Day
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed: 2015 
Nationality: British
Skills and experience 
Chartered certified accountant who makes a 
significant contribution as Chairman of the 
Audit Committee, responsible for the interface 
between the Committee and the auditors and 
internal audit.
Colin has more than 25 years’ experience in 
senior roles and non-executive positions at 
blue-chip companies across a wide range 
of industries, including engineering and 
technology, pharmaceuticals, oil and gas and 
aerospace. He brings significant commercial 
and financial expertise to the Board.
Current appointments
Non-Executive Chairman of Premier Foods plc. 
Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the 
Audit Committee of Euromoney Institutional 
Investor PLC.
Appointments in unlisted companies 
Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the 
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee of the UK 
Government’s Department for Environment, 
Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Non-Executive 
Director of FM Global Inc. and FM Insurance 
Europe S.A. Non-Executive Chairman of 
MK:U Limited.
Organisations
Independent member and member of 
the Finance Committee of the Council of 
Cranfield University.
Previous appointments
Chief Executive of Essentra PLC, Chief Financial 
Officer of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Group 
Finance Director of Aegis Group plc, Non-
Executive Director of WPP plc, Easyjet plc, 
Imperial Tobacco Group plc, Cadbury plc, FM 
Global and Senior Independent Director of 
Amec Foster Wheeler plc.
Committee membership
A  N  R
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
101
Directors’ Report

Gender Diversity
 Female
44%
 Male
56%
Independence
 Independent1
67%
 Non-Independent
33%
1	 Excluding the Chairman.
Board of Directors – Non-Executive
continued
Nancy Gioia
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed: 2017 
Nationality: American
Skills and experience 
Electrical engineer who has held senior 
engineering and operational roles and has 
a strong background in manufacturing.
Nancy’s background in the fast-paced 
automotive manufacturing area brings 
important perspective to Board discussions 
about strategic initiatives. Her prior roles mean 
that she brings an understanding of the value 
of culture and diversity and inclusion to her 
role as Chair of the Corporate Responsibility 
Committee and as the Non-Executive Director 
responsible for employee engagement. She 
also has a keen interest in cyber security.
Current appointments
Non-Executive Director of Brady Corporation, 
Chair of the Management Development and 
Compensation Committee and member of 
the Technology Committee. Non-Executive 
Director of Lucid Group Inc., member of the 
Executive Committee, Member of the Board of 
Advisors of KPIT Technologies Ltd.
Appointments in unlisted companies 
Principal of Gioia Consulting Services, LLC, 
a strategic business advisory company.
Organisations
Member of the University of Michigan- 
Dearborn Electrical and Computer Engineering 
Advisory Council and Engineering Dean’s 
Advisory Board.
Previous appointments
Held several key executive positions at Ford 
Motor Company during a 33-year career. 
Non-Executive Director of Exelon Corporation, 
former Chair of AutomotiveNEXT and Stanford 
University Alliance for Integrated Manufacturing.
Other responsibilities
Appointed by the Board as the Non-Executive 
Director responsible for employee engagement.
Committee membership
A  N  R  C
Alison Goligher OBE
Senior Independent Director 
Appointed: 2014 
Nationality: British
Skills and experience 
Trained engineer and holds a MEng Petroleum 
Engineering from Heriot-Watt University.
Alison brings important energy sector 
experience and, with her strong operations 
focus, makes an excellent contribution to 
strategic discussions. During her seven years 
on the Board she has built strong relationships 
with other non-executives and executive 
management and has a detailed knowledge of 
the Group which makes her well qualified for 
the role of Senior Independent Director which 
she assumed in 2021. 
Alison has chaired our Remuneration 
Committee since 2019 and also chairs 
Remuneration Committees on two other 
boards, all of which provide her with 
excellent experience of overseeing complex 
remuneration matters and policy reviews.
Current appointments
Non-Executive Director of United Utilities 
Group PLC and Chair of the Remuneration 
Committee. Non-Executive Director of 
Technip Energies N.V. and Chair of the 
Compensation Committee.
Appointments in unlisted companies 
Part-time Executive Chair of Silixa Ltd, 
a provider of distributed fibre optic 
monitoring solutions.
Organisations
Member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the 
Institute of Directors, the Society of Petroleum 
Engineers and the Society of Petrophysicists 
and Well Log Analysts (SPWLA).
Previous appointments
Various roles at Royal Dutch Shell from 2006 to 
2015, most recently as Executive Vice President, 
Upstream International Unconventionals. 
Previously spent 17 years at Schlumberger, 
a supplier of technology, integrated project 
management and information solutions to oil 
and gas customers worldwide.
Committee membership
A  N  R  
Committee membership
A   Audit
N   Nominations
R   Remuneration
C   Corporate Responsibility
F   Finance
D   Disclosure
  Denotes Chairman
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
102

Non-Executive Director Tenure
 0–2 years
14%
 3–4 years
29%
 5–6 years
29%
 7–8 years
14%
 9+ years
14%
Executive Director Tenure
 0–2 years
0%
 3–4 years
50%
 5–6 years
50%
 7–8 years
0%
 9+ years
0%
Guy Hachey
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed: 2019 
Nationality: Canadian
Skills and experience 
Holds an MBA from Concordia University, 
a B. Comm. from McGill University and has 
over 30 years’ experience in senior roles 
across aerospace and automotive industries.
Guy brings significant operational, 
commercial and global experience to the 
Board. During his career, Guy has played a 
vital role in transforming product portfolios 
and was recognised at Bombardier Aerospace 
for having brought five new derivative aircraft 
to market. His invaluable experience and 
knowledge with company transformations 
introduces a fresh perspective to discussions 
at Board and Committee meetings, and his 
skill-set aligns well in supporting the Board 
achieve its strategic priorities.
Current appointments
Non-Executive Director of Hexcel 
Corporation and Chairman of the 
Compensation Committee.
Previous appointments
Guy served as President and Chief Operating 
Officer of Bombardier Aerospace from May 
2008 to July 2014. Prior to joining Bombardier, 
he held numerous senior roles with Delphi 
Corporation, including President Delphi 
Powertrain Systems and President Delphi 
Europe, Middle East and Africa. Guy began 
his career with General Motors Corporation, 
where he held senior operational roles in 
Canada and the US.
Committee membership
A  N  R  
Caroline Silver
Non-Executive Director 
Appointed: 2019 
Nationality: British
Skills and experience 
Chartered accountant with significant global 
investment banking experience specialising in 
financial institutions, financial technology and 
market infrastructure, and capital raising.
Caroline brings strong financial, investment and 
audit skills to the Group gained from her broad 
experience in different industry sectors. As Chair 
of a listed company, she also brings experience of 
leading international strategies and shareholder 
dialogue and introduces a fresh perspective to 
discussions at the Board and Committees owing 
to her background in financial services.
Current appointments
Non-Executive Chair of consumer products 
group PZ Cussons Plc and Chair of the 
Nominations Committee. Non-Executive Director 
of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Chair 
of ICE Clear Europe Limited. Member of the 
International Advisory Board of Adobe Inc.
Appointments in unlisted companies 
Non-Executive Director of BUPA, Chair of the 
Risk Committee and member of the Audit and 
Remuneration Committees. Part-time advisory 
partner at Moelis & Company. Mentor at JNA 
Mentoring Partners.
Organisations
Trustee of the Victoria and Albert Museum and 
Chair of the Finance and Investment Committees 
and member of the Audit Committee.
Previous appointments
Caroline was Vice Chair of EMEA Investment 
Banking at Bank of America Merrill Lynch and 
spent 14 years at Morgan Stanley where she 
held a number of senior positions including 
Global Vice Chair of Investment Banking and 
European Head of Financial Institutions. She 
started her career as a chartered accountant 
with PricewaterhouseCoopers. Previously on the 
Board of the London Ambulance Service NHS 
Trust and Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee. 
Former Senior Independent Director of M&G 
PLC and member of the Audit, Remuneration, 
Risk and Nominations Committees.
Committee membership
A  N  R  
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
103
Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance
Directors’ Report
Management  
Committees
Board Committees
Remuneration
The Independent  
Non-Executive Directors
Determines the reward strategy for 
 the Executive Directors and senior 
management, taking into  
consideration shareholder  
interests and the  
wider workforce.
Audit
The Independent  
Non-Executive Directors 
Monitors the integrity of the Group’s 
financial statements, the effectiveness  
of the external and internal auditors,  
risk and internal control processes,  
tax and treasury.
Corporate  
Responsibility 
Two Independent  
Non-Executive Directors, 
the Executive Directors and 
Group General Counsel
Stakeholder engagement, including but  
not limited to employees, and oversees 
the implementation of the Group’s  
strategy and programmes in the areas  
of corporate responsibility, charity  
and community, ethics and  
business conduct (including  
anti-corruption) and 
environment.
Disclosure
Executive Directors,  
Company Secretary, VP  
Investor Relations and  
Group General Counsel 
Discusses and approves all  
matters related to inside 
information under the  
market abuse regime.
Nominations 
Chairman and Independent 
Non-Executive Directors 
Ensures the Board and senior  
management team have the appropriate 
skills, knowledge and experience to 
operate effectively and to deliver 
the Group’s strategy.
Finance
Executive Directors and 
Group General Counsel & 
Director, Corporate Affairs
Approves treasury related activity, 
insurance and other matters 
delegated by the Board.
Executive Committee
Chief Executive and his direct reports.
Responsible for overall management of the 
Group, driving its vision and strategy and ensuring 
the organisational culture leverages diversity, 
industry knowledge, global perspective and 
customer insight.
Commercial Committee
Executive Directors, Group General 
Counsel and Director, Corporate Affairs, 
Group Director, Engineering & Strategy 
and Group Operations Director.
Reviews and approves bids and proposals of 
Group significance and any other significant 
commercial activity.
Technology Advisory Board
Group Director, Engineering & 
Strategy, Chief Technology Officer, 
between two and four external 
members with backgrounds in 
technology or academia, Meggitt 
engineering fellows and other 
appropriate employees.
Provides advice on the direction and pace of 
technology road maps, increases awareness  
of disruptive technologies, business models  
or business trends and provides guidance on 
new areas and opportunities.
Board of Directors
Membership: Sir Nigel Rudd (Chairman), Executive and Independent Non-Executive Directors
Creating and delivering sustainable value by:
•	 Collectively setting the strategy and directing the Group.
•	 Setting the Group’s values and standards.
•	 Ensuring obligations to shareholders, employees and other stakeholders are met.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
104

Key matters reserved for the Board:
•	 Approval of the Group’s strategic aims, objectives, purpose and values.
•	 Approval of significant changes in accounting policies.
•	 Approval of the Group’s risk appetite statement.
•	 Approval of the viability statement.
•	 Approval of capital projects or treasury activities over pre-determined amounts.
•	 Appointment and removal of Board members.
•	 Approval of significant Group policies.
•	 Reviewing the Group’s culture and corporate governance arrangements.
•	 Appointment and removal of the Company Secretary.
Area of focus in 2021
Key matters 
considered
Outcome
Strategy
The Group’s strategy 
 
 
Acquisition
 
Disposals
The Board receives regular updates on business strategy throughout 
the year and held a strategy session in October where it approved the 
five-year strategic plan for the Group.
Reviewed and approved the terms of the proposed acquisition of the 
Group by Parker-Hannifin.
Approved the sale of the high pressure metallic ducting and clamps 
business in January 2021 and the sale and leaseback of the Group’s 
Airframe Systems facility in Loughborough, UK in July 2021.
Culture
Code of Conduct and 
Group policies 
The Board reviewed and re-approved our Code of Conduct which 
reflects our commitment to ethical business conduct and to comply 
with laws and regulations. The Code demonstrates the conduct that is 
a fundamental part of our values and culture.
During the year the Board has also reviewed and approved Group 
policies on the following matters: Diversity and Inclusion, Financial 
Crime, Environmental, Treasury and a consolidated policy on Ethical 
Business Conduct and Anti-Bribery and Corruption.
Monitor culture
The Board receives numerous updates throughout the year to monitor 
culture and how well policies have been embedded. Further details on 
how we monitor culture can be found on page 107.
Leadership and purpose
Our purpose at Meggitt is to design and 
manufacture world-class systems and 
products for the aerospace, defence and 
selected energy markets to enable the 
extraordinary and deliver sustainable 
solutions for the most challenging 
environments by working closely with our 
customers and focusing on engineering 
and operational excellence.
The role of the Board
Our role as a Board is to promote 
the long-term success of the Group. 
We do this by establishing its purpose, 
implementing and overseeing 
frameworks for governance and risk 
management and receiving regular 
updates on governance, stakeholder 
engagement activities, risk, strategy 
and culture.
Whilst day-to-day responsibility for 
the business lies with the executive 
management team, we maintain a 
schedule of matters reserved for the 
Board which we review regularly and 
against the latest guidance and best 
practice to ensure that key decisions 
which affect the Group and are of the 
utmost importance to our shareholders 
and wider stakeholders are taken by the 
Board as a whole.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
105
Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance
continued
Directors’ Report
Area of focus 
in 2021
Key matters 
considered
Outcome
Risk
Risk appetite and 
principal risks
 The Board:
–	 Conducted a robust assessment of the emerging and principal 
risks facing the Group and determined the nature and extent of 
the principal risks the Group is willing to take in order to achieve its 
long-term strategic objectives.
–	 Approved an updated Risk Management Policy.
–	 Implemented a new risk oversight process (risk on a page).
–	 Received an update on the effectiveness of risk management from 
the Audit Committee.
–	 Reviewed and approved the risk appetite statement and Group 
Risk Register.
–	 Approved the long-term viability statement.
 
Long-term viability
Reviewed models of a number of scenarios including climate change, 
base case and severe but plausible downside scenario for both 
planning and going concern purposes which underlie the long-term 
viability of the Group.
Operational 
performance
Performance of the 
four divisions against 
strategic objectives
The Chief Executive provided updates on divisional performance at 
every meeting.
The divisional presidents attended Board meetings during the year to 
provide detailed updates on divisional performance.
Financial 
performance
Payment to 
shareholders
In order to retain cash within the Group, manage net debt levels and 
preserve flexibility the Board did not recommend a final dividend for 
2020 or declare an interim dividend during 2021.
Financial statements
Approved the 2020 financial statements and 2021 interim 
financial statements. 
Going concern
The Board reviewed the models underlying the appropriateness of 
adopting the going concern basis in the 2020 financial statements.
Budget
The Board reviewed performance against 2021 budget.
Governance
Stakeholder engagement
The Board continued with its stakeholder engagement programmes 
as detailed on pages 90 to 92 and took the interests of all stakeholders 
into consideration when making its decisions through the review of 
detailed stakeholder analysis provided with each Board proposal.
Governance framework
The Board reviewed and updated the terms of reference for its 
principal committees.
Effectiveness
An internal evaluation was conducted at the end of 2021 for the 
Board and its Committees to reflect on their own performance and 
recommend areas for improvement.
Independence
The Board gave careful consideration to whether Guy Berruyer 
remained independent on conclusion of his third three-year term as 
a Non-Executive Director of the Company, and concluded that he 
remained independent.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
106

Purpose, strategy and values
To perform our role effectively, it 
is essential that we have a good 
understanding of the views of our 
shareholders and other key stakeholders. 
Details of shareholder and other 
stakeholder engagement activities can 
be found on pages 90 to 92. Output from 
these activities are reported to the Board 
and its Committees to help shape the 
decisions that we make.
We hold an annual strategy day where 
we receive a detailed report on the 
markets in which the Group operates, 
agree the strategic objectives to achieve 
our purpose and approve the financial 
plan to implement them. We receive 
updates from the businesses and 
functions throughout the year to assess 
performance against the strategy and 
provide additional direction if needed. 
Our values are supported by our High 
Performance Culture initiative and 
embedded in our Code of Conduct and 
Group policies which we review and 
approve on a rolling basis to ensure that 
they remain appropriate and clearly 
articulate the behaviours we expect from 
employees and management.
The Remuneration and Nominations 
Committees promote our values by 
ensuring that we have the right people in 
the organisation who respect our purpose 
and values and structuring remuneration 
schemes to reward the right behaviours as 
well as strategic achievements.
The Audit Committee plays a key role in 
ensuring that our values are embedded 
in our financial reporting process 
and risk management framework by 
monitoring the integrity of the financial 
statements and reviewing the adequacy 
and effectiveness of the Group’s internal 
controls, risk management systems and 
processes. The Corporate Responsibility 
Committee monitors culture by 
overseeing the implementation of 
the Group’s strategy and corporate 
responsibility programmes. The Chair of 
the Corporate Responsibility Committee 
is also the Non-Executive Director 
responsible for employee engagement 
and undertakes a range of activities 
alongside other Non-Executive Directors 
each year to assess how well our values 
are embedded within the organisation, 
better understand the challenges faced 
by our workforce, share feedback with 
senior management and the Board, and 
make recommendations based on the 
output from the engagement.
How we monitor culture
1.   Health and safety – Reports are provided to the Board at every meeting through the Chief Executive, with detailed 
reports every six months and regular presentations from the Vice President of Health and Safety on our safety culture 
and leading and lagging indicators.
2.   Reports to the Board on culture, diversity and inclusion and engagement – There is regular commentary provided in 
the Chief Executive’s Report at every meeting. We also have a standalone annual session with the Group HR Director 
focused on our culture, diversity and inclusion and engagement.
3.   Annual employee engagement survey feedback – A summary of the results of the annual engagement survey was 
shared with the Board in February 2022, with a detailed review taking place with the Non-Executive Director for 
employee engagement beforehand.
4.   Employee engagement – Reports from the Non-Executive Director for employee engagement are provided to the 
Board. See page 92 for further details on engagement activities and key themes in 2021.
5.   Whistleblowing and ethics reports – Provided quarterly to the Board to monitor if there are any systemic issues and 
how they are being addressed. More detailed reports are provided to the Corporate Responsibility Committee at each 
meeting. The Corporate Responsibility Committee Chair has separate meetings with the Group Director, Corporate 
Compliance, Ethics & Corporate Responsibility.
6.   Internal audit reports – Provided to the Audit Committee at each meeting and identify areas of non-compliance to 
help us assess the effectiveness of the policies and processes implemented to embed our values and shape our culture. 
We also monitor management’s response to audit findings and time taken to address audit actions.
7.   UK gender pay gap – Receive an update on the UK gender pay gap report, including an explanation of the factors that 
have impacted the data and actions implemented to close the gap.
8.   Modern slavery – Receive an update on the approach to modern slavery and approve the modern slavery statement. 
This includes details of processes and activities that have been implemented to reduce the risk of slavery and human 
trafficking in our organisation and supply chain.
9.   Prompt payment reporting – Review performance on supplier payment practices and discuss improvements 
to processes. 
10. Training completion rates – Robust and regular training is essential to ensure our workforce understands our policies 
and regulations that apply to them. During 2021, we continued to deliver virtual training on key governance and 
regulatory matters and track completion rates. Employees without regular access to remote training undertake it in 
a classroom environment. We maintain an annual schedule of mandatory training for both new starters and existing 
employees with training completion rates reported to the Board and the Corporate Responsibility Committee.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
107
Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance
continued
Directors’ Report
Shareholders and other stakeholders
Corporate 
Responsibility 
Committee
Remuneration 
Committee
Board
Audit  
Committee
Nominations 
Committee
Workforce/culture/performance
Ensure remuneration is fair  
across the organisation 
Attract and retain talent
Strategic objectives
Oversight financial reporting 
 and risk management
Business and functional  
updates
Policies
Ensuring the right people  
are in place
Oversight 
of engagement 
Engage
Reports
Engage
Reports
Engage
Reports
Reports
Reports
Engage
Oversight corporate  
responsibility 
Reports and KPIs
Assurance on integrity of 
the financial statements
Promote and reward  
right behaviours 
How we ensure our culture aligns with our values and strategy
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
108

Board effectiveness
Composition
The composition of the Board is 
closely monitored by the Nominations 
Committee to ensure that it remains 
appropriately balanced and is regularly 
refreshed to safeguard its independence 
and ensure that the skills, knowledge 
and experience of Board members align 
with those needed to deliver against the 
business strategy. 
Appointments, induction 
and training
We have a formal, rigorous and 
transparent procedure for the 
appointment of new Directors. 
On appointment, Directors are 
provided with a comprehensive 
induction programme tailored to their 
needs based on their experience and 
background and the requirements of 
the role.
The Chairman agrees a personalised 
approach to the training and 
development of each Director and 
reviews this regularly. The Company 
Secretary assists with professional 
development where required and 
Directors are encouraged to update 
their skills regularly. Training needs are 
assessed as part of the Board evaluation 
process described below. During 2021 
an updated briefing was provided 
by external lawyers to the Board and 
members of the Executive Committee 
with regard to inside information and 
their obligations under the market 
abuse regime.
The Non-Executive Directors’ 
knowledge and familiarity with the 
Group is facilitated by access to senior 
management, reports on the business 
and site visits.
Resources are available to all Directors 
to develop and update their knowledge 
and capabilities.
Roles and responsibilities 
Chairman
Sir Nigel Rudd
•	 Leads the Board and sets 
the agenda.
•	 Promotes culture of openness 
and debate.
•	 Ensures the Board is effective.
•	 Facilitates the contribution of Non-
Executive Directors and oversees 
the relationship between them and 
the Executive Directors.
•	 Ensures there is an effective 
system for communication 
with shareholders.
Senior Independent Director 
Alison Goligher
•	 Makes herself available to 
shareholders if they have concerns 
which cannot be resolved through 
the normal channels.
•	 Chair of the Nominations 
Committee when it is 
considering the Chairman of the 
Board’s succession.
•	 Appraises the Chairman’s 
performance annually with the 
Non-Executive Directors.
•	 Acts, if necessary, as a focal 
point and intermediary for the 
other Directors.
Chief Executive
Tony Wood
•	 Leads the Executive Directors 
and the senior executive team 
in the day-to-day running of the 
Group’s business.
•	 Ensures effective implementation 
of Board decisions.
•	 Regularly reviews the strategic 
direction and operational 
performance of the 
Group’s business.
•	 Keeps the Chairman informed on 
all important matters.
Executive Directors
Tony Wood and Louisa Burdett
•	 Responsible for successful 
delivery of the Group’s objectives 
and strategy.
•	 Manage various functions and 
operations across the Group.
Independent Non-Executive 
Directors
Alison Goligher, Colin Day, Nancy 
Gioia, Guy Hachey, Caroline 
Silver and Guy Berruyer
•	 Constructively challenge 
management and scrutinise 
their performance.
•	 Contribute to the development of 
the Group’s strategy.
•	 Monitor the Group’s performance.
•	 Satisfy themselves on the integrity 
of financial information and the 
effectiveness of financial controls 
and risk management.
•	 Determine appropriate levels of 
remuneration for the Executive 
Directors and participate in the 
selection and recruitment of new 
Directors and succession planning.
Non-Executive Director for 
employee engagement
Nancy Gioia
•	 Engages with employees 
through a range of formal and 
informal initiatives.
•	 Ensures that employee policies and 
practices are in line with the Group’s 
purpose and values and support the 
desired culture.
•	 Regularly reviews Speak Up 
Line reports.
Company Secretary 
Marina Thomas
•	 Acts as secretary to the Board and 
its Committees.
•	 Ensures compliance with Board 
procedures and advises on 
governance issues.
•	 Facilitates the induction process for 
new Directors.
•	 Ensures good information flow 
within the Board and between 
Non-Executive Directors and 
senior management.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
109
Directors’ Report

Directors’ Report
Corporate Governance
continued
Conflicts
Our Directors hold appointments in 
other listed and non-listed companies 
as shown on pages 100 to 103. 
We recognise the value derived from 
these appointments particularly 
with regard to Board discussions 
and the sharing of best practice 
where appropriate.
We maintain a register of all external 
appointments and interests of our Board 
members which is reviewed regularly 
to ensure that it is accurate and up to 
date. Directors notify the Board of any 
actual or potential conflicts arising from 
these external appointments or other 
matters, which are duly considered by 
the Board and, if thought appropriate, 
approved together with relevant 
conditions to ensure that the conflict is 
appropriately managed.
As Meggitt’s business is diverse and 
operates across multiple markets, a 
list of our competitors by division is 
included in our Group Strategy review 
and assists Non-Executive Directors in 
identifying actual or potential conflicts 
arising out of current or prospective 
external appointments.
Time commitment
The minimum time commitment 
expected from the Non-Executive 
Directors is set out in their letters 
of appointment. We monitor the 
external time commitments of our 
Directors closely to ensure that they 
have the capacity to discharge their 
responsibilities to Meggitt effectively. 
Prior to appointment, all existing 
commitments are considered against 
the overboarding guidance issued by 
the institutional shareholder advisory 
organisations, and all additional 
appointments are subject to Board 
approval following consideration of the 
additional time commitment and the 
overboarding risk.
In July 2021, Nancy Gioia was appointed 
as a Non-Executive Director of Lucid 
Group, a company incorporated in 
the United States and listed on the 
Nasdaq stock market. The Board 
considered the appointment on its own 
merit, taking into consideration the 
nature, expectation and requisite time 
commitment of the new role together 
with a holistic view of Nancy’s existing 
appointments and responsibilities and 
her strong attendance at scheduled 
and additional Board and Committee 
meetings. Following such consideration 
the Board was satisfied that Nancy 
would continue to have sufficient time 
to effectively discharge her duties to 
Meggitt following the appointment. 
The Board is mindful of the number of 
external appointments held by Colin 
Day and Caroline Silver. Both Colin and 
Caroline have risen to the challenges 
and extra time commitment demanded 
of the Board and its Committees 
over the past two years. Colin has 
continued to meet with management 
and the internal and external auditors 
outside of scheduled Audit Committee 
meetings to provide additional oversight 
and guidance on risk management 
and financial reporting matters. 
Both Caroline and Colin have mentored 
a member of senior management 
and have been involved in the 2021 
employee engagement programme 
and Caroline presented at our 2021 
leadership conference. The Board 
continues to be satisfied that both Colin 
and Caroline have time to discharge 
their duties to Meggitt and is completely 
satisfied with their performance. 
Additionally, as part of the year-end 
process, each Non-Executive Director 
confirmed that, taking into consideration 
all of their external appointments and 
commitments, they continue to have the 
capacity to effectively discharge their 
duties to Meggitt effectively. 
Information and support
The Chairman is responsible for ensuring 
the Directors receive accurate, timely 
and clear information.
The Company Secretary is responsible 
for supplying the Board with the 
information it needs to discharge its 
duties and ensuring good information 
flows within the Board and Committees 
and between senior management and 
the Non-Executive Directors. The Board 
considers the quality of information it 
receives and the effectiveness of the 
annual Board schedule during the Board 
evaluation process.
All Directors have had access to the 
advice and services of the Company 
Secretary, who is responsible 
to the Board for advising on all 
governance matters.
The Board allows all Directors to take 
external independent professional 
advice at the Group’s expense.
Board evaluation
The Board undertakes an annual 
review of its own effectiveness using a 
combination of independent externally 
facilitated and internally run evaluations 
over a three-year cycle. The last external 
review was undertaken in 2019 by Clare 
Chalmers Limited. An internal review was 
undertaken in 2021 which focused on 
key governance areas. 
The Board reviewed the suggestions 
made following the evaluation and 
agreed the actions shown on page 112.
Mindful that Guy Berruyer’s nine-year 
tenure on the Board could impair, or 
appear to impair his independence 
and impartiality towards executive 
management, the Board carefully 
considered his contribution to 
Board and Committee meetings and 
relationship with the management 
team and unanimously agreed that Guy 
continued to bring an objective view 
to Board and Committee discussions, 
offer constructive challenge to executive 
management and hold them to account, 
add value to the development of 
the Group’s strategy and remained 
independent and was not swayed by his 
relationship with the executives.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
110

2020 Evaluation results
Agreed actions
Progress
Improving the quality of Board and 
Committee papers with a focus 
on enhancing readability, avoiding 
duplication and making better use of 
executive summaries.
Feedback has been delivered to executive management on: (i) the length of 
papers; (ii) overlap in reports; (iii) more use of executive summaries; and (iv) the 
importance of readability.
Recognising the cost and time saving 
benefits of wholly-virtual meetings 
given the international nature of the 
Board, integrate some wholly-virtual 
meetings into future Board schedules.
Wholly-virtual meetings continued in 2021 due to ongoing COVID-19 
restrictions and the need for short notice meetings to consider and respond to 
interest in the Group from TransDigm and Parker-Hannifin.   
Some wholly-virtual meetings will be scheduled for 2022.
Schedule more virtual engagements 
with senior executives in 2021. 
Senior management engagement was hosted virtually in 2021. Further details 
on engagement activities can be found on page 92.
Resume site visits and in person 
Non-Executive Director events and 
briefings as soon as possible.
Ongoing COVID-19 restrictions in 2021 impeded this action, however, the 
Chairman and several Non-Executive Directors visited the new Ansty Park site 
in 2021, and three Non-Executive Directors attended the senior leadership 
conference in February 2022. Subject to COVID-19 restrictions, site visits and 
other in person Non-Executive Director events will resume in 2022.
Board and Committee evaluation process
In order to evaluate its own 
effectiveness, the Board undertakes 
annual effectiveness reviews using 
a combination of independent 
externally facilitated and internally run 
evaluations over a three-year cycle.
November 2021
Internal Board evaluation 
planning by the Chairman 
and Company Secretary.
December 2021 
to January 2022
Questionnaires issued 
to the Board, Committees 
and other attendees.
The Board effectiveness questionnaire 
posed questions in the following areas 
ranked on a scale of 1 to 3 (with space 
for comments):
•	 How well the Non-Executive 
Directors support and challenge 
executive management.
•	 How well the Non-Executive 
Directors understand the Group’s 
business and contribute to setting 
the Group’s strategy.
•	 Whether the Board responded 
well to the proposed acquisition 
by Parker-Hannifin, gave due 
consideration to all stakeholder 
groups and achieved the 
best outcome for the 
Company’s shareholders. 
•	 How well the Board understands 
the impact of climate change on 
Meggitt’s markets and operations.
•	 Whether the Board takes the 
impact of climate change into 
consideration when 
setting the Group’s policies 
and strategy. 
•	 Whether the Board has a good 
understanding of the interests of the 
Company’s key stakeholders.
•	 To what extent Board meetings 
are engaging with high quality 
discussion and open debate 
and whether all Board members 
contribute to discussions and work 
together well.
•	 Whether the skills and experience on 
the Board are appropriate.
•	 Whether the Chairman’s leadership 
style and tone is effective.
•	 Whether the Company Secretary is 
supporting the Board as appropriate. 
•	 Whether the Board schedule and 
papers are appropriate.
•	 Whether risk management is 
undertaken appropriately.
•	 Whether the Board has sufficient 
oversight of the succession 
planning process.
February 2022
A detailed discussion 
is held by the Board on 
their responses to the 
questionnaire and resulting 
actions are agreed.
The Senior Independent Director met 
with the Non-Executive Directors 
to assess the performance of the 
Chairman and the Chairman held 
remote meetings with the Non-
Executive Directors without the 
Executive Directors present where the 
performance of executive management 
was discussed.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
111
Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance
continued
Directors’ Report
2021 Evaluation
Another internally run evaluation was conducted via an online questionnaire at the end of 2021 and focused on the governance 
areas set out on page 111. The Board has reviewed the output from the evaluation and has agreed the following:
Area
Agreed action
Engagement with the senior 
management team.
The continued impact of COVID-19 limited the frequency of interactions 
between the senior management team and the Non-Executive Directors, as 
a result additional engagement sessions between the senior management 
team and the Non-Executive Directors will be incorporated into the 2022 
engagement schedule.
Board composition.
The proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin is expected to 
complete in Q3 2022 and there is no appetite to change the Board composition 
whilst the acquisition process is progressing. Should the proposed acquisition 
not complete a detailed review of the Board’s composition will be conducted. 
Whilst appointments will always be made on merit, strengthening the ethnic 
diversity of the Board will be a key consideration in the recruitment process for 
any new Director.
Board and Committee papers.
Whilst recognising the improvements to Board and Committee papers over 
the year, more work is needed to ensure the succinctness of presentations and 
consistent use of executive summaries. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
112

Shareholder documents
We provide annual reports and other 
documents to shareholders in their 
elected format. Electronic copies of this 
Annual Report and Accounts and the 
Notice of the Annual General Meeting 
will be posted on our website, together 
with announcements, press releases and 
other investor information, including an 
analysis of ordinary shareholders by size 
of holdings and shareholder type.
General Meetings
2021 Annual General Meeting
We recognise the importance of 
the Annual General Meeting for 
shareholders and held a hybrid 
meeting in 2021 to facilitate and 
enhance shareholder engagement 
and participation. 
We received 24.34% of votes against 
the resolution to approve the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy and 22.82% 
of votes against the resolution to 
authorise the Directors to allot shares 
up to the maximum nominal amount 
of £26,042,444, representing the UK 
Investment Association’s guideline 
limit of approximately two-thirds of the 
Company’s share capital. 
Remuneration Policy
We recognise the importance 
of stakeholder engagement on 
remuneration, particularly in the 
aftermath of and recovery from the 
COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the Annual 
General Meeting and as reported in the 
2020 Directors’ remuneration report, we 
carried out an extensive consultation 
with our largest shareholders, 
representing a significant proportion 
of the register. As a result of the initial 
consultation stages we implemented 
changes to the proposed Policy to take 
account of feedback received. We were 
pleased that the Policy was supported 
by a wide range of our shareholders as 
a result. 
Whilst we will continue to consider any 
feedback received as we implement the 
Policy, we still believe that the hybrid 
approach to our long-term incentives 
adopted by the Policy, including both 
performance and restricted share 
awards, is completely appropriate 
for Meggitt, allowing us to maintain 
alignment between our shareholders 
and motivating our leadership and 
senior management team. We will 
continue to assess the suitability of 
the hybrid approach during the 
Policy period.  
Authority of Directors to 
allot shares
We are aware that some institutional 
investors, particularly outside the UK, 
have specific policies against supporting 
allotment authorities or allotment 
authorities at the level sought. We also 
note that this level of authority continues 
to be supported by the majority of our 
shareholders and is in line with the UK 
Investment Association’s share capital 
management guidelines and prevailing 
voting guidelines of leading corporate 
governance agencies applicable to UK 
listed companies. 
The Company has taken into 
consideration shareholders’ views and 
best practice in this area, and whilst 
noting the stance of certain investors 
on the matter, the Board considers it 
appropriate to maintain the flexibility 
these authorities provide to enable the 
Company to respond quickly to market 
developments and enable allotments 
to take place to finance business 
opportunities. The Directors confirm 
that they have no current intention of 
exercising this authority.
General and Court Meetings
In September 2021 the General and 
Court Meetings for shareholders to 
approve the offer from Parker-Hannifin 
were held as hybrid meetings to 
facilitate and encourage shareholder 
participation and engagement. 
The resolution put to the General 
Meeting was passed by 99.79% of the 
votes cast and the resolution put to the 
Court Meeting was passed by 99.77% of 
the votes cast. 
2022 Annual General Meeting
Our 2022 Annual General Meeting 
is scheduled on 29 June 2022 and 
will be held as a hybrid meeting to 
enhance shareholder engagement and 
participation channels. Further detail are 
included in the Notice of Meeting.
All Directors are subject to election by 
shareholders at the first Annual General 
Meeting after their appointment. 
After that, all Directors are subject to 
annual re-election to comply with the 
2018 Code. All Directors in office at the 
date of the Annual General Meeting will 
be subject to re-election.
Statement of compliance
Throughout the financial year ended 
31 December 2021 and to the date of 
this Annual Report, we have complied 
with the provisions set out in the 
2018 Code published by the Financial 
Reporting Council, with the exception 
of Provision 38. Provision 38 requires 
the alignment of Executive Director 
pension contributions with the wider 
workforce. We were planning a review 
of the UK pension plans and pension 
provision for Meggitt in the UK when the 
2018 Code came into force. This review 
was completed and as a result, our UK 
defined benefit pension plan closed in 
April 2021 and the UK workforce pension 
contribution will be 10% by April 2022. 
Mr Wood and Mrs Burdett received 
pension allowances in 2021 of 18% and 
17.5% of salary respectively. In 2022, 
Mr Wood and Mrs Burdett’s pension 
allowances are being reduced to 15% of 
salary. It has been agreed that further 
reductions will be reviewed by the 
Remuneration Committee in 2022 should 
the proposed acquisition by Parker-
Hannifin not proceed.
A copy of the 2018 Code can be found 
on the Financial Reporting Council’s 
website: https://www.frc.org.uk. 
Details of how the Group has applied the 
principles set out in the 2018 Code are 
included in this report and in the Audit 
Committee, Nominations Committee 
and the Directors’ Remuneration 
reports. The information required under 
Rule 7.2.6 of the Disclosure Guidance 
and Transparency Rules is disclosed in 
the Directors’ report.
By order of the Board
M L Thomas 
Company Secretary
2 March 2022
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
113
Directors’ Report

Audit Committee report
Protecting shareholders’ interests 
through financial reporting and 
internal control.
Chief Executive Officer of Essentra plc 
and Chief Financial Officer of Reckitt 
Benckiser Group plc, I can confirm that I, 
together with Caroline Silver, a chartered 
accountant with significant global 
investment banking experience, bring 
recent and relevant financial experience 
to the Committee.
In addition to myself, Committee members 
throughout 2021 were Guy Berruyer, Nancy 
Gioia, Alison Goligher, Guy Hachey and 
Caroline Silver. As a whole, we bring skills, 
knowledge and experience relevant to the 
aerospace, defence and selected energy 
markets in which the Group operates. 
Further details are included in our profiles 
on pages 100 to 103.
By invitation, there were a number of 
other regular attendees at meetings 
throughout the year including the 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive, 
Chief Financial Officer, the Group 
Financial Controller, and the internal 
and external auditors. The Group Head 
of Tax and a representative of Grant 
Thornton, who provide co-sourced 
audits for the internal audit function, 
also attended meetings by invitation.
Responsibilities
The Committee’s key role is to protect 
shareholders’ interests in relation to the 
Group’s financial reporting and internal 
control arrangements. The Committee 
is responsible for ensuring the integrity 
of the processes and procedures 
relating to corporate reporting and the 
effectiveness of the internal controls 
and risk management systems. The 
Board relies on the Committee to ensure 
appropriate disclosures are made in the 
financial reports and to oversee the work 
of the internal and external auditors.
Specific responsibilities include:
Financial reporting:
•	 Focusing on accounting policies, 
judgements and estimates, 
challenging the decisions and 
approach taken by management to 
ensure appropriate disclosures and 
compliance with relevant regulations.
•	 Challenging and scrutinising the work 
taken to support the long-term viability 
and going concern statements.
•	 Reviewing the content of the Annual 
Report and Accounts and advising the 
Board whether it is fair, balanced and 
understandable.
Risk and control:
•	 Monitoring the effectiveness of risk 
management and internal control 
systems.
•	 Reviewing the effectiveness of the risk 
management processes, including 
those used to determine risk appetite, 
tolerance and strategy and advising 
the Board of the appropriateness of 
those processes.
Committee membership and 
attendance in 2021
Mr C R Day
Committee 
Chairman
Mr G S Berruyer
Non-Executive 
Director
Mrs N L Gioia1
Non-Executive 
Director
Ms A J P Goligher
Non-Executive 
Director
Mr G C Hachey
Non-Executive 
Director
Mrs C L Silver
Non-Executive 
Director
  Scheduled meetings 
  Non-attendance
1 	 Unable to attend due to prior external 
commitments.
 Meetings attended  
  Non-attendance
Directors’ Report
Dear Shareholder
I am pleased to present the report of the 
Audit Committee for 2021.
I chair the Audit Committee and as a 
Fellow of the Association of Chartered 
Certified Accountants, and previous 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
114

Internal audit:
•	 Reviewing the resources and scope 
of the internal audit function and 
approving the internal audit charter.
•	 Approving annual internal audit 
plans and reviewing the results and 
effectiveness of internal audits.
External audit:
•	 Monitoring independence and 
effectiveness of the external 
auditors and approving the terms of 
engagement and audit fees.
•	 Recommending to the Board the 
appointment, re-appointment or 
removal of the auditors.
•	 Reviewing and approving the annual 
external audit plan and ensuring that 
it is consistent with the scope of the 
audit engagement and coordinated 
with the activities of internal audit.
Effectiveness
The Committee has a carefully planned 
agenda of items of business to ensure 
that high standards of financial governance 
and risk management are maintained. 
There were three scheduled meetings 
during the year.
I have an open, constructive and 
collaborative relationship with 
management and meet with them 
and the internal and external auditors 
outside scheduled meetings to provide 
guidance as appropriate. Prior to each 
scheduled meeting, I meet with the 
Chief Financial Officer, Group Financial 
Controller, Head of Assurance & Risk and 
the external auditors, to share views and 
consider key issues, particularly regarding 
significant estimates and judgements, 
to be highlighted to the Committee for 
discussion and ensure appropriate time is 
allocated for each item.
The Committee reviewed its own 
effectiveness via the process described 
on pages 110 to 111. Overall the results 
of the survey were very positive with 
no improvement actions identified 
and areas previously highlighted for 
improvement in prior years scoring 
highly. It was noted that the Committee 
was effective at discussing the material 
matters of importance and challenging 
management appropriately.
Since the year end, the Committee has 
discussed the external auditors’ final 
audit clearance report for 2021, reviewed 
the financial information contained in 
the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts 
and full year results announcement and 
recommended them to the Board for 
approval. The Committee also provided 
advice to the Board that the 2021 Annual 
Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, 
is fair, balanced and understandable. 
The Committee provided this advice 
having reviewed management’s process 
and confirmed its output, and provided 
confirmation to the Board that this process 
was effective. The Committee also 
recommended that the Board approves 
the viability and going concern statements.
Committee activities in 2021
Approved
•	 The 2021 external audit fees
•	 The internal audit plan for 2022
•	 The terms of engagement for the external auditors
•	 The 2022 Audit Committee Agenda
Reviewed
•	 The financial information contained in the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts, 2020 full year and 2021 interim results 
announcements and recommended them to the Board for approval.
•	 Significant estimates and judgements in respect of the Group’s financial statements (pages 116 to 119).
•	 The independence and effectiveness of the external auditors, and agreed their terms of engagement; the Committee also 
reviewed the process for the mandatory audit tender in light of the proposed acquisition by Parker-Hannifin.
•	 The adequacy and effectiveness of: (i) the systems of internal control; (ii) the risk management process; and (iii) the process 
executive management used to enable the Board to make the viability statement.
•	 The effectiveness of the Committee and external audit using the process described on pages 110 to 111.
•	 The outcome of the internally facilitated internal audit review (see page 121).
•	 The external auditors’ strategy memorandum, including level of materiality applied by PwC, and interim audit clearance report for 2021.
•	 Terms of Reference for the Committee, which were recommended to the Board for approval.
•	 The reporting processes applied in the production of the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts and the output of these processes 
to determine that the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts was fair, balanced and understandable and advised the Board as such.
•	 The basis of preparation of the financial statements as a going concern and scrutinised the work undertaken by management.
•	 Issues and findings of the internal audit function and satisfied itself that management had resolved or was in the process of 
resolving any outstanding issues.
•	 The financial reporting consequences of TCFD and climate change.
•	 The implications of the BEIS consultation on “Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance”.
Updates and reports
•	 Received at every meeting from the Head of Assurance & Risk a report on findings from internal audits and progress with the 
internal audit plan and internal controls across the Group.
•	 Received an update on the results of the viability statement stress testing scenarios.
•	 Received updates on the risk management process.
•	 Received an update from the Group Head of Tax.
•	 Received technical accounting and governance updates provided by the Group Financial Controller, Company Secretary 
and the external auditors.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
115
Directors’ Report

Audit Committee report
continued
Critical accounting estimates and judgements:
Area
Action
Provision for environmental 
matters relating to historic sites 
and related insurance receivables
At each meeting in 2021, and also at the February 2022 meeting, the Committee 
discussed the status of a claim from a third party that a former site operated 
by Whittaker had contributed to environmental pollution for which it should be 
responsible. These discussions included the status on a number of areas notably: 
the third-party legal action; mediation between Whittaker and the third party; 
mediation between Whittaker and its historic insurers and the ongoing litigation 
brought by Whittaker against those insurers; and discussions with other third 
parties over their responsibility for reimbursing Whittaker should it be found 
responsible for any amounts. 
At both the March 2021 meeting and the July 2021 meeting, the Committee 
concluded that based on conditions at that date, including the nature and 
amounts claimed by the third party, that neither a mediated settlement or, in 
the event the matter went to court, an adverse trial outcome would result in a 
material charge being recorded in the income statement in the next 12 months. 
In their subsequent December 2021 and February 2022 meetings, the Committee 
discussed the change in conditions since the July 2021 meeting and which 
had led to the recognition by management of a £29.5m charge to the income 
statement and were satisfied these could not have previously been considered 
reasonably foreseeable.
In respect of the £29.5m liability recognised in the year, the Committee 
discussed their expectations of potential outcomes. The Committee agreed with 
management that a most likely amount approach should be used for estimating 
the liability and that the amounts recorded reflected their best estimate of 
that outcome based on conditions prevailing at the date of their February 
meeting. Given the uncertainty over how the matter would be finally resolved, 
the Committee concluded it was however appropriate to disclose that it was 
reasonably foreseeable that material changes to the amounts recorded could be 
recognised in the next 12 months.
At the February 2022 meeting, the Committee discussed with management its 
assessment that it was not appropriate to recognise any amounts recoverable 
from either historic insurers or third parties. The Committee concluded that whilst 
it expected material amounts would be recovered, under the accounting policy it 
had agreed with management that typically any insurance or third party recovery 
in respect of environmental matters would only be considered virtually certain 
when there was a signed binding agreement between the parties concerning 
the nature and amounts to be reimbursed, no recoverable amounts should be 
recognised as an asset at the balance sheet date. However, the Committee 
agreed that given the likelihood that material amounts would meet the criteria to 
be recognised within the next 12 months, this should be disclosed.
The Committee agreed that disclosing their estimate of any material adjustments 
to the liability recognised or amounts that would be recognised as recoverable 
from historic insurers or other third parties would be seriously prejudicial to the 
outcome and accordingly should not be disclosed.
Significant estimates, judgements and disclosures relating to the financial statements
The table below summarises the significant estimates, judgements and disclosures reviewed by the Committee in respect of 
the Group’s financial statements ensuring key personnel in the finance team have appropriate exposure to the Committee in the 
virtual environment.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
116

Critical accounting estimates and judgements:
Area
Action
Development costs
The Committee discussed a report from management analysing amounts 
capitalised across different aircraft platforms and manufacturers, including a 
sensitivity analysis for specific programmes. 
In light of the tensions with Russia over Ukraine at the date of the February 
Committee, which preceded the date on which Russian troops entered Ukraine, 
the main area of focus was the Irkut MC-21 programme, on which the Group has 
a capitalised value of £40.9m at 31 December 2021. The Committee discussed 
management’s sensitivity analysis for the programme, which showed headroom 
had increased during 2021; the extent to which fleet volumes would need to 
fall from those modelled by the Group before a material impairment would be 
required, noting this was significant; the existing reported order backlog for the 
aircraft; and its planned entry into service (EIS) date in late 2022 or early 2023. 
The Committee concluded that, management’s assumptions were appropriate 
and agreed no impairment was required. However, the Committee agreed that 
it was reasonably foreseeable that tensions over Ukraine may escalate further in 
the future, and were these to lead to sanctions, trade embargoes and/or other 
measures being imposed, this could result in significant delays to the aircraft’s 
EIS and/or the ability of the Group to access the benefits it expects from the 
programme. Were these events to happen in the next 12 months, the Committee 
concluded there was a risk a material impairment loss would be required against 
the capitalised value on the programme. 
For the remaining platforms on which the Group had material capitalised 
balances at 31 December 2021, the Committee concluded that assumptions made 
by management were reasonable and the carrying values and estimated lives of 
the programmes were appropriate. The Committee also discussed the risk of any 
programme cancellations or OEM bankruptcies which would lead to a material 
impairment and concluded that the risk of such an event in the next financial year 
was not significant. 
There was also a wider discussion about the potential impacts of climate 
change on the expected life of aircraft/engines and the fleet volumes assumed 
by management in their impairment testing, including input from the Group’s 
Director, Engineering & Strategy. The Committee concluded that climate 
change had been appropriately reflected in the impairment testing modelling 
assumptions used by management. 
Retirement benefit obligations
The Committee considered a report from management setting out the basis 
on which assumptions on mortality, inflation and the rates at which scheme 
liabilities are discounted had been determined; how the Group’s assumptions 
used in its prior year 2020 financial statements benchmarked against those 
disclosed by other large corporate entities in the UK and US; and the sensitivity 
of amounts recorded in the balance sheet to changes in assumptions. The 
Committee concluded that the assumptions used, which were supported by 
third-party actuarial advice, were appropriate. Given the sensitivity of the deficit 
recognised to reasonably foreseeable changes in assumptions in the next 12 
months, the Committee agreed this should continue to be considered a critical 
accounting estimate.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
117
Directors’ Report

Other significant areas of Committee focus:
Area
Action
Going concern
The Committee reviewed the work performed by management in assessing the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. 
For the base case, the Committee considered the outputs from management’s 
work, noting that in their role as members of the Board they had reviewed and 
challenged the cash flow forecasts prepared by management that were used in 
this scenario. The Committee also noted the level of committed credit facility 
headroom that existed throughout the going concern assessment period and the 
significant covenant headroom at the twice yearly testing dates of 30 June 2022 
and 31 December 2022. The Committee agreed that given the Group is in an offer 
period under the UK Takeover Code, it is not providing financial guidance for 2022 
and accordingly the base case scenario assumptions should not be disclosed.
In considering the reverse stress scenario, the Committee discussed those 
conditions under which the Group would be close to breaching its covenant ratios 
during the going concern assessment period and the risk that these could occur. 
The Committee noted that at each of the four covenant testing dates since the 
COVID-19 outbreak, the Group had maintained comfortable headroom on its 
covenant ratios with net debt/EBITDA remaining within the Board’s target range 
of 1.5x to 2.5x. The Committee concluded that the likelihood of the conditions 
modelled in the reverse stress scenario occurring was remote. 
The Committee agreed in the event the proposed acquisition of the Group by 
Parker-Hannifin was completed during the going concern assessment period, 
that it believed Parker-Hannifin would be able to continue to operate the Group 
as a going concern during that period and be able to finance the proposed 
acquisition, including settlement of those liabilities becoming repayable on a 
change of control.  
The Committee concluded there was no material uncertainty around the Group’s 
ability to continue as a going concern and that the disclosures in the Annual 
Report were appropriate.
Goodwill
The Committee agreed with management that, in light of the proposed 
acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin, a reliable estimate of the fair 
value less costs of disposal (FVLCOD) of the Group existed. In assessing how 
to attribute the FVLCOD of the Group to the level of the CGUs and groups of 
CGUs at which impairment testing was performed, there was a discussion with 
management on various different methods that could be used. As the offer from 
Parker-Hannifin was made during the period the Group was performing its annual 
impairment testing using a value-in-use basis, consistent with prior years, the 
Committee agreed with management’s view that they should use the results of 
this value-in-use analysis as an appropriate basis for allocation.
At the December meeting, the Committee considered a report from 
management setting out the assumptions made in its value-in-use modelling, 
including the cash flows used, which as members of the Board they had 
previously reviewed; how these cash flows had been probability weighted to 
reflect a number of different scenarios; discount rates applied to the cash flows; 
and long-term growth rates, including the extent to which they reflected the 
potential impacts of climate change and other structural changes in the market. 
They also discussed a sensitivity analysis prepared by management setting out 
the impact reasonably foreseeable changes in these assumptions could have 
on the value-in use of each CGU and group of CGUs and how this would impact 
the determination of their FVLCOD. The Committee noted that in each of the 
sensitivities modelled, there was significant headroom between the FVLCOD of 
the CGUs and groups of CGUs and their carrying value.
The Committee therefore concluded that no reasonably foreseeable change in 
assumptions would lead a material goodwill impairment in the next 12 months.
Audit Committee report
continued
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
118

Other significant areas of Committee focus:
Area
Action
Liabilities for uncertain tax 
positions
In assessing the appropriateness of the provision recognised in respect of 
uncertain tax positions, the Committee considered a report from management 
setting out the basis for the assumptions made for each significant area of tax 
exposure. It discussed the assumptions in light of the current tax environment 
and the status of tax audits in the main jurisdictions in which the Group operates. 
A separate presentation from the Group’s Head of Tax on each of the major 
areas of exposure was also received and discussed. The Committee noted 
that the anticipated assessment in the year by HMRC of £16.9m tax in respect 
of the European Commission’s decision that state aid partially applied to one 
of the UK’s CFC exemptions utilised by the Group, had been fully provided 
for at 31 December 2020. It agreed that the future recovery of any element of 
the assessment was dependent on the occurrence of certain events which are 
uncertain, including the European General Court overturning the European 
Commission’s state aid ruling on appeal. Given these uncertainties, the 
Committee agreed that it was not appropriate to recognise any receivable in 
respect of the matter. The Committee further agreed there was not a significant 
risk of any material adjustment to the estimates made in 2022.
Treatment of items excluded from 
underlying profit measures
The Committee discussed the treatment and disclosure of amounts included 
within exceptional operating items. The Committee agreed that it was 
appropriate to treat the £29.5m costs relating to the Whittaker environmental 
claim as exceptional given its size, nature and that it was considered non-
recurring, noting that it related to a former site sold by Whittaker, prior to its 
acquisition by the Group in 1999. 
It noted other items classified as exceptional operating items continued to 
reflect the way in which they, as members of the Board, reviewed the underlying 
performance of the Group, were treated consistently year on year and 
disclosed appropriately.
The Committee agreed with management’s exclusion of costs incurred relating to 
the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin from underlying profit 
measures and the disclosure of those costs contingent on the acquisition being 
completed as a financial commitment.
Key areas of oversight
Financial reporting
The Committee’s role is to ensure that 
disclosures in the financial statements 
are appropriate given the data available 
and, if not, challenge management to 
explain and justify their interpretation 
and, if necessary, update the disclosure.
Significant estimates and judgements 
reviewed by the Committee in respect of 
the 2021 financial statements are set out 
on pages 116 to 119. When considering 
these matters we sought the opinion of 
the external auditors as to whether the 
estimates and judgements made were 
appropriate taking into consideration 
information available and agreed 
accounting practices.
The Committee reviews the content 
of the Annual Report and Accounts 
and advises the Board whether, taken 
as a whole, it is fair, balanced and 
understandable and provides the 
information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s performance, 
business model and strategy. To assist 
with this assessment, the Committee 
seeks input from the Head of Assurance 
& Risk and reviews questions completed 
by management to illustrate the fair, 
balanced and understandable aspects 
of the Annual Report and Accounts and 
a summary of the financial reporting 
process. Following consideration of 
these items together with the Annual 
Report and Accounts, the Committee is 
satisfied that the key events and issues 
impacting the Group during the year, 
both positive and negative, have been 
adequately reflected and referenced in 
the Annual Report and Accounts.
EU Single Electronic Format (ESEF)
Pursuant to Disclosure and Transparency 
Rule (DTR) 4.1.14R, the Group’s 2021 
Annual Report and Accounts has to be 
prepared in XHTML, a form of computer 
language used to create web pages, and 
the data included in the consolidated 
financial statements needs to be marked 
up with XBRL tags. In December 2021, 
the Committee reviewed the process 
management would take to comply 
with the new requirements, which 
included: our publisher partnering with 
Arkk Solutions, a firm specialising in 
XBRL tagging since 2011 to deliver a 
full service ESEF solution; preparing a 
test ESEF filing using the 2020 Annual 
Report and Accounts to pre-empt and 
address any potential issues; and the 
Group’s central finance team working 
with our publisher and Arkk to agree the 
tagging taxonomy. In February 2022, the 
Committee received an update on the 
ESEF process and was satisfied with the 
approach taken.  
External audit
The external auditors are 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) who 
were first appointed for the financial 
year commencing 1 January 2003 after 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
119
Directors’ Report

a competitive tender. The Committee 
undertook a further competitive tender 
in 2017 (described in our 2017 Audit 
Committee report) as a result of which 
it was agreed that PwC should be 
re-appointed. There are no contractual 
obligations restricting the Committee’s 
choice of external auditors.
The mandatory rotation of auditors will 
take place in 2023. Audit tenders include 
a significant investment by the firms 
chosen to tender, as well as additional 
workload for the Group’s finance 
team. In light of the high probability 
that the proposed acquisition of the 
Group by Parker-Hannifin will complete 
before the end of PwC’s audit tenure, 
the Committee confirmed support 
for management’s proposal to pause 
and re-commence the audit tender 
project in Q2 2022 should it be 
considered necessary.
The Committee maintains oversight 
of the Group’s relationship with the 
external auditors, and is responsible 
for reviewing the effectiveness of the 
audit process, including an assessment 
of the quality of audit, and assessing 
annually their independence and 
objectivity taking into account relevant 
UK professional and regulatory 
requirements and the Group’s 
relationship with the auditors as a whole.
Quality
PwC presented the audit strategy for 
the 2021 financial year at the meeting 
in July 2021, including their application 
of materiality and the scope to be 
able to provide an opinion on the 
Group financial statements as a whole. 
Following discussion, the Committee 
approved the scope of the audit and the 
threshold for materiality. PwC reported 
on the progress made against the audit 
plan at subsequent meetings to enable 
the Committee to monitor progress.
Access to management 
and information
The Committee routinely meets 
PwC without executive management 
present to encourage open and honest 
feedback. No concerns have been 
raised by PwC who confirmed that they 
had been able to offer rigorous and 
constructive challenge to executive 
management during the year.
Evaluation
During the year, all members of the 
Committee, as well as key members 
of the senior management team and 
those who regularly provide input into 
the Committee or have regular contact 
with the external auditors, completed 
a feedback questionnaire seeking 
their views on the effectiveness of the 
external audit. Views of the respondents 
were sought in terms of:
•	 The independence and objectivity of 
the external auditors.
•	 The external auditors understanding 
of the business and risks material to 
the audit including those resulting 
from COVID-19.
•	 The robustness of the external audit 
process and degree of challenge to 
matters of significant audit risk and 
areas of management subjectivity.
•	 Whether the scope of the audit and 
the planning process were appropriate 
for the delivery of an effective and 
efficient audit.
•	 The expertise of the audit team 
conducting the audit.
•	 The degree of professional scepticism 
applied by the external auditors.
•	 The appropriateness of the 
communication between the 
Committee and the external auditors 
in terms of technical issues.
•	 The quality of the audit and service 
provided by the external auditors.
The feedback was collated and 
presented to the meeting of the 
Committee held in February 2022, at 
which the conclusions were discussed. 
The Committee is satisfied with 
PwC’s performance and that PwC 
have employed an appropriate level 
of professional challenge in fulfilling 
their role. 
Independence
In assessing PwC’s independence, the 
Committee takes into consideration 
information and assurances provided by 
the external auditors confirming that the 
partner and staff involved in the audit 
are independent of any connection to 
Meggitt. PwC also confirmed to the 
Board that its partner and staff complied 
with their ethics and independence 
policies and procedures which are 
fully consistent with the 2019 FRC 
Ethical Standard. PwC is also required 
to provide written disclosure at the 
planning stage of the audit about any 
significant relationships and matters 
that may reasonably be thought to 
have an impact on its objectivity and 
independence and that of the lead 
partner and the audit team. The lead 
audit partner must change every five 
years and other senior audit staff rotate 
at regular intervals. The lead audit 
partner is Mr J Ellis whose appointment 
in this role commenced with the 
audit for the financial year ended 31 
December 2018. Mr Ellis has had no 
previous involvement with the Group in 
any capacity.
The Committee is responsible for the 
development and implementation of 
the non-audit services policy which 
was reviewed and re-approved in 2021. 
The policy reflects the 2019 FRC Ethical 
Standard and caps non-audit services 
at 70% of the average annual statutory 
audit fee. The policy covers a short list 
of permitted non-audit services and 
applies a limit of £100,000 for individual 
items that the Chief Financial Officer can 
approve, with individual items in excess 
of this amount requiring approval from 
the Committee.
The Committee agrees fees paid to the 
external auditors for their services as 
auditors. Details of fees paid for audit 
services, audit-related services and 
non-audit services can be found in Note 
6 to the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements. Fees paid for non-audit 
services in 2021 were less than £0.1 
million (1.1% of the total audit fee) and 
average fees paid for non-audit services 
for the last three years to 2021 were 
less than £0.1 million (1.0% of the total 
audit fee over that period). Fees paid for 
non-audit services related to services 
permitted under the Group’s policy on 
non-audit services.
The Committee is satisfied that the 
overall levels of audit-related and non-
audit fees are not material to the PwC 
office conducting the audit, or PwC as a 
whole, and therefore the objectivity and 
independence of the external auditors 
was not compromised by the non-audit 
services provided to the Group.
On the basis of the information above, 
the Committee has determined that 
the audit process is effective and that 
PwC are appropriately objective and 
independent and has recommended 
that the Board submit the re-
appointment of PwC to shareholders for 
approval at the Annual General Meeting 
in 2022 for the 2022 financial year.
Audit Committee report
continued
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
120

Internal audit
The internal audit function is led by 
the Head of Assurance & Risk and is a 
key element of the Group’s corporate 
governance framework. Its role is to 
provide independent and objective 
assurance, advice and insight on 
governance, risk management and 
internal control to the Committee, 
the Board and to senior management. 
The internal audit function makes 
recommendations to improve processes 
and address key issues identified 
through their audit programme.
The Committee agrees the annual 
internal audit plan which is developed 
according to a risk assessment process 
and ensures adequate resources are 
available to execute the plan. The risk 
assessment process initially divides 
our business units into three tiers 
determined by financial measures. 
Tier 1 businesses are visited annually, 
with Tier 2 businesses visited every 
other year and Tier 3 businesses 
every third year. This is then subject 
to a further discretionary risk-based 
adjustment, if there are circumstances 
which suggest a business unit should 
have an audit accelerated. Reasons 
for this can include adverse prior audit 
findings, a change in IT system, site 
location moves, substantiated issues 
reported by whistleblowers, senior 
leadership changes or operational 
performance issues.
The business unit audit programme’s 
scope includes finance, tax, programme 
management, HR/payroll, commercial 
intermediaries, bid and proposal activity, 
corporate compliance and business 
continuity. In 2021, internal audits were 
carried out for 30 Group locations 
as part of the rotational audit cycle, 
including shared service functions. 
During the year, the Committee 
monitored implementation of the plan 
which was broadly delivered as originally 
committed with remote audits being 
conducted where necessary through the 
use of technology, including utilisation 
of applications such as WebEx and file 
sharing and other innovative solutions 
such as using cameras on factory floors 
to validate tests.
The scope and responsibilities of internal 
audit continue to expand and develop 
with the business and are documented 
in the Internal Audit Charter. 
In addition to the site-based business 
unit reviews, internal audit has a co-
source arrangement with Grant Thornton 
UK LLP to assist with resourcing 
specialist audits for areas such as IT, 
treasury and complex legislation such 
as the Criminal Finances Act 2017 and 
Defense Federal Acquisition Relation 
Supplement (DFARS). During the year, 
Grant Thornton conducted audits on 
cyber security, finance shared services, 
ERP implementations and change 
management and reported its findings 
back to the Committee in December 
2021. The approach for 2022 will 
continue to rely on Grant Thornton’s 
subject matter experts to deliver 
specialist audits, including readiness 
for cyber security model certification, 
IT resilience, site and IT transformation 
projects and finance shared services.
I regularly discuss the results of audits 
with the Group Head of Assurance & 
Risk between Committee meetings, 
and at each meeting the Committee 
receives a status update on the internal 
audit programme, discusses and 
challenges any significant issues arising 
and monitors implementation by the 
business of any recommendations made.
The Committee routinely meets with 
the Group Head of Assurance & Risk 
without executive management present. 
No concerns have been raised and it 
was confirmed that the internal auditors 
had been able to carry out their work 
and offer constructive challenge to 
executive management during the 
year. The Committee considered 
the effectiveness of the internal 
audit function in 2021, taking into 
consideration its discussions with the 
Group Head of Assurance & Risk without 
management present, its assessment of 
the internal audit plan and the delivery 
against that plan, the reports it received 
on the work of internal audit and the 
role and effectiveness of the internal 
audit function in the context of the 
wider risk management system and was 
satisfied that the quality, experience 
and expertise of the function remained 
appropriate for the size and complexity 
of the Group. 
Communications with the FRC
During the year there was no interaction 
with the FRC’s Corporate Reporting 
Review team.
Whistleblowing
To help us encourage the highest 
standards of ethical behaviours, 
corporate governance and 
accountability in our business activities, 
the Group operates an independent 
and anonymous Speak Up Line which 
is available 24 hours a day, seven days 
a week. A summary of whistleblowing 
activity, together with details of related 
investigations, is provided to the 
Corporate Responsibility Committee, 
which is responsible for oversight and 
review of the process for handling 
allegations from whistleblowers. The 
Board also reviews whistleblowing 
reports on a quarterly basis and 
routinely reviews the arrangements for 
employees to raise concerns.
Compliance with Audit 
Services Order
We comply with the Competition and 
Market Authority Order 2014 relating 
to audit tendering and the provision of 
non-audit services, as discussed further 
above.
On behalf of the Audit Committee
Colin Day
Chairman of the Audit Committee
2 March 2022
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
121
Directors’ Report

Nominations Committee report
Overseeing the composition of the Board 
to ensure that it has the right balance of 
skills, experience and expertise to deliver 
on the Group’s strategic objectives.
Dear Shareholder,
The Nominations Committee plays a 
leading role in assessing the balance 
of skills, knowledge, experience 
and diversity on the Board and its 
Committees. It leads the process for 
appointments, ensures plans are in place 
for orderly succession to both the Board 
and senior management positions, and 
oversees the development of a diverse 
pipeline for succession.
The Committee reviews the structure, 
size and composition (including the 
skills, knowledge, experience and 
diversity) of the Board and makes 
recommendations to the Board on 
any proposed changes. Decisions on 
Board changes are taken by the Board 
as a whole taking into consideration 
the Committee’s recommendations. 
In performing its duties, the Committee 
has access to the services of the Group 
HR Director and the Company Secretary 
and may seek external professional 
advice at the Group’s expense.
The full terms of reference for the 
Committee can be found on our website. 
Committee effectiveness 
In 2021, as a Committee we reviewed 
our own effectiveness by way of a 
questionnaire as set out on pages 110 to 
111. Overall the evaluation was positive, 
with the Committee satisfied with its 
own effectiveness and no further actions 
to take as a result.
Board composition and tenure
We consider a comprehensive skills 
matrix that sets out the experience 
and background of each Director and 
review it against the Group’s strategic 
objectives and principal risks to ensure 
the Board comprises the skills and 
capabilities required to meet the 
demands of the business.
In February 2022 we expanded our skills 
matrix to include details of Directors’ 
experience in respect of sustainability/
climate change in the sectors in which 
we operate. This provides a clearer 
picture of expertise in this area and will 
assist in determining the requisite skill 
set of future appointees.
Our skills matrix also includes the 
tenure of myself and the Non-Executive 
Directors to ensure that our succession 
is regularly discussed and planned 
accordingly in order to facilitate regular 
refreshment of Board membership. 
Guy Berruyer’s third three-year 
term expired on 1 October 2021. 
During the year, we carefully considered 
his independence, taking into 
Committee membership and 
attendance in 2021
Sir Nigel Rudd
Committee Chairman
Mr G S Berruyer
Non-Executive Director
Mr C R Day
Non-Executive Director
Mrs N L Gioia
Non-Executive Director
Ms A J P Goligher
Non-Executive Director
Mr G C Hachey
Non-Executive Director
Mrs C L Silver
Non-Executive Director
  Meetings attended  
  Non-attendance
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
122

consideration his relationship with 
executive management and the challenge 
and support he provided at Board and 
Committee meetings. We established that 
he remained independent and provided 
a key point of stability during a period of 
significant change. We also determined 
that Guy’s skills and experience remained 
relevant, and his capabilities and 
contribution at Board and Committee 
meetings added great value to the 
Company. Recognising the importance 
of continuity whilst the proposed 
acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin 
progresses, we recommended to the 
Board that Guy continue to serve as an 
independent Non-Executive Director. 
The Board accepted this recommendation 
and extended his service contract for a 
further one-year term. 
Colin Day’s second three-year term also 
expired during the year. We recognised 
the significant contribution he had made 
during the year to Board and Committee 
discussions, the additional time he 
had dedicated to his Audit Committee 
duties, including regular meetings with 
management and the internal and external 
auditors outside formal proceedings 
and the time he had dedicated to the 
employee engagement programme (see 
page 92 for details) and were satisfied 
that he was able to continue to discharge 
his duties effectively notwithstanding his 
external appointments. We recommended 
that he remain on the Board as an 
independent Non-Executive Director and 
the Board accepted this recommendation 
and extended his service contact for a 
further three-year term.
Guy Hachey’s first three-year term 
as a Non-Executive Director expired 
on 31 December 2021. During this 
first term Guy has brought significant 
insight, challenge and expertise to 
Board and Committee discussions 
and has provided valuable support 
to the employee engagement 
programme. Following consideration 
of Guy’s contribution to the Group 
we recommended that he remain on 
the Board as an independent Non-
Executive Director. The Board accepted 
this recommendation and extended his 
service contract for a further three-
year term.
In light of Guy Berruyer’s length of 
service, we agreed in 2020 that Alison 
Goligher should succeed Guy as Senior 
Independent Director and she was 
appointed to the role immediately 
following the 2021 Annual General 
Meeting. Alison has nearly seven years’ 
experience on the Board and has, as a 
result, built good relationships with the 
Non-Executive Directors and executive 
management, has relevant experience 
of Board dynamics, and has a detailed 
understanding of the Group, which 
makes her well qualified to succeed Guy 
as Senior Independent Director.
As a Committee we are mindful of 
Guy Berruyer’s tenure on the Board, 
my announcement to retire from the 
Board (which was postponed until 
further notice during the COVID-19 
pandemic) and that Alison Goligher’s 
nine-year term is due to expire in 2023. 
Whilst focus in 2020 and 2021 has been 
on continuity to guide the Company 
through the COVID-19 pandemic and 
the proposed acquisition of the Group 
by Parker-Hannifin we are aware that, 
should the proposed acquisition not go 
ahead, changes will need to be made 
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Listed Chair
CEO
AC Chair
RC Chair
SID
Operations
Financial
Risk/Legal/Regulatory
M&A
Information security (including cyber)
Climate change/Sustainability
Aerospace/Defence/Energy
Aerospace aftermarket/Customer Services
Industrial
Engineering
Europe (Inc UK)
N America
S America
Asia
Africa
Australia
 
Geographical Markets
Sectors
Corporate
Board Experience
Listed Chair
CEO
AC Chair
RC Chair
SID
Operations
Financial
Risk/Legal/Regulatory
M&A
Information security (including cyber)
Climate change/Sustainability
Aerospace/Defence/Energy
Aerospace aftermarket/Customer Services
Industrial
Engineering
Europe (Inc UK)
N America
S America
Asia
Africa
Australia
 
Geographical Markets
Sectors
Corporate
Board Experience
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Board skills and experience
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
123
Directors’ Report

Nominations Committee report
continued
to ensure our Board is appropriately 
refreshed. We have reviewed and 
discussed the skills matrix and any future 
appointments will focus on ensuring the 
Board is appropriately diverse with the 
right balance of skills and experience 
to lead the Company in achieving its 
strategic objectives.
Board effectiveness
In February 2022 we reviewed the 
Board skills matrix and the output of the 
Board evaluation process (described on 
pages 110 to 111) and considered the 
Board’s effectiveness. We paid particular 
attention to the skillset each Director 
brings to the Board, Guy Berruyer’s 
independence, and to whether Colin 
Day and Caroline Silver continued to 
have sufficient time to discharge their 
duties effectively in light of their external 
appointments. On review, we were 
satisfied that the Group has a strong, 
dynamic and effective Board capable 
of delivering the Group’s strategic 
objectives and recommended to the 
Board that all Directors be put forward 
for re-election at the 2022 Annual 
General Meeting.
Executive succession planning
The Group operates a succession 
planning process which enables the 
identification and development of 
employees with the potential to fill key 
business leadership positions.
The succession plans for the executive 
team, including the Executive Directors 
are reviewed by the Committee to 
ensure that they are effective, based on 
merit and objective criteria, promote a 
diverse talent pool and take into account 
the challenges and opportunities 
facing the Group as well as the Group’s 
strategic priorities. The plan identifies 
emergency replacements, those who 
are ready to fulfil leadership roles now, 
those that will be ready in the short term 
following further development and those 
that will be ready in the longer term.
Diversity and inclusion
The Board places great emphasis on 
ensuring that its own membership 
reflects diversity in its broadest sense. 
A combination of demographics, 
skills, experience, race, age, gender, 
educational and professional 
background and other relevant personal 
attributes on the Board is important 
in providing a range of perspectives, 
insights and challenge needed to 
support good decision-making.
Whilst we do not currently have an ethnic 
minority Director on our Board, the Board 
remains diverse in terms of demographics, 
skills, experience, age, gender and 
professional background. Further details 
on the diverse attributes of Board 
members can be found in the pie charts on 
pages 102 and 103 and in the Board skills 
and experience chart above.
It is our policy that Board appointments 
are made on merit, taking account 
of the specific skills and experience, 
independence and knowledge needed 
to ensure a rounded Board and the 
diversity benefits each candidate can 
bring to the overall Board composition. 
The policy aims for all appointments 
to diversify and strengthen the 
overall composition of the Board by 
contributing something new to the 
overall board dynamic, be it in terms of 
experience, skills, perspective, interests 
or other attributes.
Our Diversity and Inclusion Policy, which 
is available on our website, is brought 
to the attention of any executive search 
firm used as part of the selection and 
appointment process for a Board 
position and we request that they be 
proactive in marketing to a truly diverse 
range of candidates.
On gender diversity, the Board currently 
has four female Board members 
representing 44% of the Board. This year, 
Meggitt appeared 78th in the list of FTSE 
100 companies on the FTSE Women 
Leadership Review gender diversity 
rankings. Our position is largely impacted 
by the combined data for Executive 
Committee members and their direct 
reports which stands at 18.2% and shows 
that we can improve further in this area. 
Details of the work underway to strengthen 
the diversity of our talent pipeline can be 
found on page 74.
The Board has discussed the suggested 
target set out in the Parker Review of 
having “at least one Director of colour 
on the Board by the end of 2021” 
and was planning to take this into 
account, alongside diversity of gender, 
nationality, skills and experience, in 
filling the next Board position. However, 
due to the focus on managing the 
Group’s response to and recovery from 
the COVID-19 pandemic, the significant 
cost and time commitment required 
to identify and select suitable Board 
candidates and the high probability that 
the proposed acquisition of the Group 
by Parker-Hannifin will complete in 2022, 
the Committee determined that it would 
not be practical to recruit an additional 
Board member during the year. As such 
there was no opportunity to strengthen 
the ethnic diversity of our Board in 2021. 
Whilst no appointments are currently 
planned for 2022, should the proposed 
acquisition of the Group by Parker-
Hannifin not complete, a detailed review 
of the Board’s composition will be 
conducted and whilst appointments will 
always be made on merit, strengthening 
the ethnic diversity of the Board will be 
a key consideration in the recruitment 
process for any new Director. 
The Board, our executive leadership team, 
and management at all levels recognise 
that a diverse and inclusive workforce 
is critical to running a sustainable and 
successful business. Our Diversity and 
Inclusion Policy, which was reviewed and 
updated during the year, seeks to increase 
and leverage diversity by employing 
a diverse workforce that reflects the 
communities within which we operate and 
fostering an inclusive culture where people 
are valued, respected and supported. 
The Board and Executive Committee 
remain focused on this area.
Candidate selection
When recruitment is undertaken, 
an independent external search 
consultancy is used for the appointment 
of the Chairman and Non-Executive 
Directors with guidance provided by 
the Committee on the requisite skills, 
knowledge and experience to fill any 
gaps identified by the Board skills matrix 
and complement those of existing Board 
members. Instruction is also given to 
provide long and short lists, with a 
diverse range of candidates.
On behalf of the 
Nominations Committee
Sir Nigel Rudd
Chairman of the 
Nominations Committee
2 March 2022
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
124

Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
125
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
It has been a busy year during which we 
have continued to engage with our wider 
stakeholders during an exciting, interesting 
and challenging period for the Group.
Chair’s introduction 
and annual statement
Introduction
I am pleased to present the Directors’ 
remuneration report for the year ended 
31 December 2021. In addition to this 
introduction and annual statement, the 
report includes: an “At a Glance” summary; 
the Annual Report on Remuneration for 
the year; and a copy of the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy which was approved 
by shareholders at the 2021 AGM. 
Looking back… performance and 
remuneration in 2021
Many of the challenges of 2020, driven 
by the external environment, continued 
to impact the civil aerospace industry in 
2021, including the rise of the Omicron 
COVID-19 variant in the latter part 
of the year. Despite these ongoing 
challenges, Meggitt has continued to 
position itself well to benefit from the 
recovery over time of the civil aerospace 
sector, delivering robust performance 
outcomes against its KPIs. This is 
reflective of the significant ongoing 
contribution of all our colleagues, 
and the leadership of the Executive 
Directors and the wider leadership team. 
Significant time and effort was also 
invested in the proposed acquisition of 
the Group by Parker-Hannifin, to protect 
the interests of all our stakeholders and, 
if successful, significantly accelerate 
and de-risk our plans to deliver value to 
our shareholders. 
It is this challenging, but exciting, 
context that framed the Committee’s 
decision-making in the year, and which 
is summarised below.
Salary
The April 2021 annual merit based 
increases were deferred for all employees 
until October due to the continued 
uncertainty for the industry. Additionally, 
during the first half of 2021, in order to 
manage cost and capacity with continued 
volatility in civil aerospace markets, most 
of our employees, including the Executive 
Committee, took mandatory or voluntary 
unpaid leave ranging from 8-13 days. 
Our Board also volunteered a salary/fee 
reduction of 10% during the same period. 
In October 2021, a delayed increase 
was awarded to all employees of 2.5%, 
including Executive Directors, Executive 
Committee and Non-Executive Directors.
STIP
2021 performance was above threshold 
for underlying operating profit but below 
threshold for the free cash flow element. 
The Executive Directors’ performance 
against the strategic objectives set at 
Committee membership and 
attendance in 2021
Ms A J P Goligher
Committee Chairperson
Mrs C L Silver
Non-Executive director
Mr C R Day
Non-Executive director
Mrs N L Gioia
Non-Executive director
Mr G C Hachey
Non-Executive director
Mr G S Berruyer
Non-Executive director
  x Scheduled meetings 
  x Additional meetings
 
 Meetings attended  
  Non-attendance
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
126

the start of year, and in the context of 
the evolving priorities of the Group 
during the year, was rated as significantly 
exceeding expectations, using the 
same scoring methodology as for the 
wider STIP population. This outcome 
warranted full payout of this element, 
resulting in an overall STIP outcome 
of 46.7% of maximum. The Committee 
is satisfied that the outcome is 
warranted by underlying performance 
and accordingly did not exercise any 
discretion. 25% of the amount earned 
will be deferred into shares for two years.
LTIP
Although our financial performance 
in 2019 was strong, the outturn for the 
financial metrics in the 2019 LTIP award 
(based on three-year performance 
to 31 December 2021) was below 
the threshold vesting, against the 
backdrop of the continuing impact of 
COVID-19 on the civil aerospace market. 
Progress against our long-term strategic 
targets produced an overall vesting of 
13.2%. The Committee considered this 
outcome in the wider context of the 
Group’s performance, recognising the 
outturn was in line with the employee 
and shareholder experience and no 
adjustments were made.
The Committee is confident that 
the 2021 remuneration outcome for 
Executive Directors is appropriate 
given the context of the internal and 
external environment.
2021 AGM 
Prior to the 2021 AGM, the Committee 
carried out an extensive consultation 
on proposed changes to the Policy with 
our largest shareholders, representing 
a significant proportion of the register. 
As a result of the initial consultation, the 
Committee implemented changes to its 
proposals to take account of feedback 
received, as detailed in last year’s 
report. We were pleased that the Policy 
was supported by a wide range of our 
shareholders as a result, registering a 
75.66% vote in favour.
In accordance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, and reflecting that 
the Policy resolution received less than 
80% of votes in favour, the Committee 
published an update on the 2021 AGM 
vote via RNS during the year. As noted 
in that market announcement, the 
Committee was aware at the time 
of the AGM that shareholders have 
divergent views on the proposals, 
mainly regarding the use of multiple 
long-term incentive vehicles. However, 
the Committee continues to believe 
that the hybrid approach adopted by 
the Policy, including both performance 
and restricted share awards, is 
appropriate for Meggitt, allowing 
us to maintain alignment between 
our shareholders and motivating our 
leadership and senior management 
team. Following shareholder approval 
of the Remuneration Policy in 2021, 
the Executive Directors received Long 
Term Incentive Plan awards under the 
performance share award (PSA) at 125% 
of salary and restricted share awards 
(RSA) at 62.5% of salary. However, we 
will continue to assess the suitability 
of the hybrid approach during the 
Policy period.
2022 implementation of Policy
The Committee remains confident that 
the Remuneration Policy continues to 
effectively support Meggitt’s short- 
and long-term strategic objectives 
and promote management and 
shareholder alignment.
The Committee took actions to apply 
our Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
appropriately and in shareholders’ 
best interests in the context of the 
offer for the Company by Parker-
Hannifin, which was approved by our 
shareholders in September 2021. 
Remuneration arrangements relating to 
the offer for the Company are detailed 
in the Co-Operation Agreement for the 
transaction. In the process with Parker-
Hannifin, we were supportive of the 
treatments secured by management 
to protect the interests of employees, 
including the preservation of all terms 
and conditions until the end of 2022, 
and beneficial terms to compensate 
participating employees for the closing 
of our Sharesave schemes following 
deal completion.
Fixed pay
Effective 1 April 2022, Executive Director 
salaries will be increased by 3% in line 
with the broader employee population. 
In line with our commitment to reduce 
Executive Director pensions over time, 
pension allowances will be further 
reduced; from 18% to 15% of salary in 
respect of the CEO and from 17.5% to 
15% of salary from 1 January 2022. 
STIP
The STIP will operate on the same basis 
as last year, with a maximum opportunity 
of 150% of salary for both Executive 
Directors and with performance 
assessed against a small number of key 
financial and strategic measures. If the 
Parker-Hannifin proposed acquisition 
completes, Meggitt will assess the 
performance conditions for the period 
up to the court sanction date and pay 
out the relevant portion of the STIP at 
that time, in accordance with the Co-
Operation Agreement. 
Long-term incentives
As in 2021, Executive Directors will 
receive LTIP awards in the form of both 
performance share awards (PSA) and 
restricted share awards (RSA).
PSAs will be granted at 125% of salary, 
with vesting assessed against an equal 
blend of EPS, ROCE and strategic 
objectives measured over three years. 
RSAs will be granted at 62.5% of salary, 
with final vesting (at the end of a three-
year vesting period for 2022 RSAs) 
subject to a Committee assessment of 
a range of business factors and overall 
Group performance. 
If the Parker-Hannifin proposed 
acquisition completes, the LTIP awards 
will vest on completion, in accordance 
with the Co- Operation Agreement. 
Looking forward
The Committee considers that the 
current remuneration structure is clear, 
simple, and appropriately aligned with 
the Group’s strategy, risk appetite 
and culture, and that incentives are 
appropriately capped. 
Our Remuneration Policy and practice 
is in line with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code (with the exception of 
Provision 38 on pension allowances).
I hope that you find this report a clear 
account of the Committee’s decisions for 
the year and would be happy to answer 
any questions you may have at the AGM.
Alison Goligher
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
127
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Remuneration at a glance
Remuneration principles
Our Remuneration Policy is designed to deliver against these key remuneration principles for the long-term growth of 
the business:
Attract 
an overall remuneration package that is competitive in the global markets where Meggitt competes 
for talent;
Align
with investors: a significant proportion of remuneration is delivered in shares and subject to long-term 
performance and holding periods; and between our Executive Directors and other senior managers who 
work as one team towards the same goals;
Incentivise
short and long-term incentive plans provide an opportunity for management to meet and exceed targets 
whilst outcomes are appropriately aligned with financial and operational performance; and
Retain
the remuneration structure and opportunity supports retention in an increasingly competitive 
global setting.
Directors’ Report
2021 activity
Approved
•	 The 2018 LTIP vesting outcome.
•	 The 2021 STIP and PSA performance targets.
•	 The 2021 PSA and RSA opportunity levels.
•	 The 2020 Directors’ remuneration report and revised Remuneration Policy (which were subsequently 
approved by shareholders at the 2021 AGM).
•	 The key remuneration terms of the Co-Operation Agreement with Parker-Hannifin.
•	 Terms of Reference for the Committee (available on our website).
•	 Since the year end, we have approved the structure of the 2022 STIP and both the 2022 PSA and RSA 
awards, and confirmed the vesting outcome of the 2021 STIP and 2019 LTIP awards.
Discretion 
exercised
•	 After due consideration, no discretion was exercised by the Committee during the year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
128

Strategic Portfolio
Investing in differentiated technologies
Delivering sustainability goals
Enhancing our business portfolio
LTIP: Innovation targets and ROCE in the LTIP. 
Sustainability targets in the LTIP.
STIP: Strategic objectives for Executive 
Directors include portfolio-related 
activity and sustainability goals.
Customers
Accelerate organic growth 
Maximising our share of the aftermarket
LTIP: Quality and delivery and other operational targets 
to facilitate business recovery are included in the LTIP.
STIP: Strategic objectives for Executive Directors 
include improving customer satisfaction.
Culture
Attracting and developing diverse talent
High performance culture
STIP: Strategic objectives for Executive Directors 
include measures to improve employee engagement 
and embed our high performance culture.
Competitiveness
Outstanding operations and processes
LTIP: Quality and delivery targets, programme 
management, ROCE and inventory improvement 
targets are measures in the LTIP.
STIP: Strategic objectives for Executive Directors 
include operational performance, footprint 
consolidation and net purchasing costs.
Linking our remuneration to our strategy
KPIs
2019-2021 LTIP
Financial 
Measures 
Strategic Measures 
Outturn 2021
72.4p
Earnings per share
(3-year cumulative)
Inventory 2.11
7%
ROCE
(3-year average)
Prog Excellence 3.1
On time delivery 68%
Quality Escapes 681
1	 Cost of Sales as used in the inventory 
turns measure includes the impact of 
exceptional items.
2021 STIP
Financial 
Measures 
Strategic 
Measures
£184m
Underlying 
Operating Profit
Culture −  
Engagement
£119m 
Free Cash Flow1
Customer −  
Operational 
Improvements
1	 As with previous years, the 2021 STIP 
uses the Free Cash Flow measure 
excluding the impact of interest 
and taxation.
Strategic Portfolio
KPIs: 
Growth 
ROCE
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
129
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
2021 Outcomes
Outcomes versus pay scenarios
Directors’ Report
Single Figure 2021
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
78%
22%
36%
19%
31%
25%
27%
24%
10%
51%
5%
13%
16%
£986
£2,170
£4,055
£1,737
44%
Salary and benefits
Pension
STIP
LTIP
RSA
Outcome
Maximum
Strategic            UOP            FCF
Strategic            EPS            ROCE
2021 LTIP Outcome (% Vesting)
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
EPS 0.0%
ROCE 0.0%
13.2%
Actual (CEO)
50.0%
20.1%
Actual (CFO)
50.0%
20.1%
Maximum
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
Pay for performance history
£
Value of £100 invested on 31 December 2010
Group Chief Executive’s single total
remuneration figure £'000
Meggitt
Mr T Twigger
Mr S G Young
Mr A Wood
FTSE 100
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
31/12/2021
31/12/2020
31/12/2019
31/12/2018
31/12/2017
31/12/2016
31/12/2015
31/12/2014
31/12/2013
31/12/2012
Incentive outcomes
2021 STIP Outcome
Mr A Wood (£’000)
Mrs L Burdett (£’000)
Single Figure 2021
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
35%
31%
24%
10%
27%
45%
78%
22%
19%
25%
16%
51%
5%
13%
£628
£1,378
£2,572
£1,103
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
130

2022 Remuneration
The summaries and illustrations below do not include any impact of the Parker-Hannifin proposed acquisition and associated Co-
Operation Agreement. In the event that the proposed acquisition completes, the terms of the Co-Operation Agreement with Parker-
Hannifin will take effect.
Components of Executive Directors’ remuneration 2022
Base salary
Set at a competitive level to attract and retain high calibre Directors in the relevant talent market.
Pension
To provide post-retirement benefits for Executive Directors in a cost-efficient manner. New Directors are 
eligible for a pension allowance at the same level as the wider workforce. Pension allowances for incumbent 
Executive Directors are being reduced to 15% with effect from 1 January 2022.
Benefits
Provides non-cash benefits which are competitive in the market where the Director is employed.
Annual 
bonus (STIP)
Incentivises Executive Directors to deliver annual financial and strategic targets set at the start of each year. 
There is a maximum award opportunity of up to 150% of salary, with 25% of any amount earned deferred in 
Meggitt shares for two years.
LTIP (PSA 
and RSA)
Aligns the interests of Executive Directors with shareholders in growing the value of the Group over the long term. 
Awards vest after three years and are subject to a two-year holding period. Executive Directors are currently eligible for 
Performance Share Awards of up to 125% of salary and Restricted Share Awards of up to 62.5% of salary. The Executive 
Directors are subject to post-cessation shareholding requirements, along with malus and clawback provisions.
Sharesave 
Scheme and 
Share Incentive 
Plan (SIP)
To align the interests of UK employees and shareholders by encouraging all UK employees to own Meggitt shares.
2022 remuneration time horizons
2022 Incentive Plans
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
STIP
Performance 
Period
Deferral Period1
PSA
Performance Period
Holding Period
RSA
Vesting Period
Holding Period
1 STIP deferral of 25% of the outcome into shares for two years.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – 
Performance Share Awards
Short-Term Incentive Plan 
(STIP)
	 Underlying operating profit
33.3%
	 Free cash flow 
33.3%
	 Strategic and financial objectives
33.3%
	
Total STIP
100.0%
	 Underlying EPS
33.3%
	 ROCE
33.3%
	 Strategic measures: HPS / Inventory /
Programmes / Sustainability
33.3%
	
Total PSA
100.0%
2022 pay scenario summaries
Max+50% SP
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
57%
35%
8%
33%
22%
5%
3%
3%
32% 10% 20%
33%
27%
14%
34%
27%
17%
£1,221
£2,114
£3,091
£3,729
19%
Salary and benefits
Pension
STIP
PSA
RSA
Max+50% SP
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
57% 8% 35%
33%
23%
5%
33%
3%
32% 10% 20%
27%
14%
£779
£1,345
£1,964
£2,368
19% 3%
27%
34%
17%
Mr A Wood (£’000)
Mrs L Burdett (£’000)
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
131
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued 
Annual report on remuneration
Executive Directors
Single total figure of remuneration for Executive Directors (audited)
The table below sets out a single figure for the total remuneration received by each Executive Director for the year ended 
31 December 2021 and the prior year:
 
Mr A Wood
Mrs L S Burdett
 
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
2021
£’000
2020
£’000
Salary1
Taxable benefits2
Pension Allowance3
 634 
 14 
 120 
 597 
 14 
 143 
 402
 14
 74 
 378 
 14 
 84 
Total fixed
 768 
 754 
 490 
 476 
Annual bonus4
Deferred bonus4
LTIP5
RSA6
357
119
275
218
–
–
171
 n/a 
226
75
174
138
–
–
–
n/a
Total variable
969
 171
613
–
Total remuneration
1,737 
 925
 1,103
 476
1	 Salary for both Executive Directors is reported with a voluntary reduction of 10% in the first half of the year in exchange for unpaid leave, aligned with the wider workforce. For the 
CEO the annual salary of £663k reduced by £33k from January to June 2021, and for the CFO the annual salary of £420k reduced by £21k from January to June 2021. Executive Director 
salaries were increased by 2.5% with effect from the deferred salary review date of 1 October 2021, in line with the wider workforce.
2	 Taxable benefits consist primarily of company car or car allowance, fuel allowance and private health care insurance. Mrs Burdett received a relocation allowance as part of the transition 
of the head office to Ansty Park of £6,240 in 2021.
3	 Pension allowances were calculated on the unreduced salary for 2021 at 18% of salary for the CEO and 17.5% for the CFO.
4	 STIP paid for performance over the relevant financial year. 25% of the payout was deferred into shares. Further details of the 2021 STIP, including performance measures, actual 
performance and bonus payouts, can be found on pages 132 to 133.
5	 LTIP is calculated as the number of shares vesting based on certain performance measures and valued at the market value of the shares on the vesting date. The value includes 
distribution payments. For 2021, the figure represents the actual vesting outcome of the 2019 award. Based on performance to 31 December 2021 the 2019 LTIP award will vest at 13.2%. 
The market value of vested shares has been estimated using the average share price over the last quarter of 2021 of 742.80 pence. £80k and £51k of the value of the 2019 LTIP shown for 
the CEO and CFO respectively is attributable to share price appreciation, with Meggitt’s share price increasing by 42% since the grant date. The value also includes accrued dividends 
of £2k and £1k for the CEO and CFO respectively. This value will be trued up in next year’s report to reflect the actual share price on the vesting date. Further details on performance 
criteria, achievement and resulting vesting levels can be found on page 134. For 2020, the figure represents the actual vesting of the 2018 award which has been trued up, compared to 
that reported last year, to reflect the share price on the date of vesting. The value of the 2018 LTIP (for the CEO only, the CFO having joined Meggitt in 2019) vesting has been updated 
from the 2020 report from £131k to £171k due to increase in share price owing to the proposed acquisition by Parker-Hannifin since the figures were estimated in February 2021.
6	 RSA (Restricted Share Awards) were granted in 2021 as 3 separate tranches with a 1, 2 and 3-year vesting period. They are subject to a holding period, which when added to the vesting 
period, will not be less than 5 years from date of grant and ends on the relevant expiry date. The 2021 figure represents full vesting of the 1-year tranche of awards granted in April 2021, 
the Committee assessment period for which was substantially completed as at year end which is reported on page 135. The market value of vested shares has been estimated using 
the share price over the last quarter of 2021 of 742.80 pence, with this value to be trued up in next year’s report. £79k and £50k of the value of the RSA shown for the CEO and CFO, 
respectively, is attributable to share price appreciation, with Meggitt’s share price increasing by 58% since the grant date. See page 135 for further details.
Incentive outcomes for the year ended 31 December 2021 (audited)
STIP in respect of 2021 performance
The Board set stretching financial and strategic targets for the STIP at the start of the 2021 financial year. These targets, and the 
performance against these, are summarised in the table below.
Executive Directors
 
Weighting
Measure
(as a percentage 
of maximum)
Threshold 
1/3 payout
Target 
2/3 payout
Stretch 
full payout
Actual1
Percentage of 
element
Financial Underlying operating profit
33.3%
£175.3m
£219.1m
£241.0m
£184.2m
40.1%
Financial Free cash flow
33.3%
£130.4m
£163.0m
£179.3m
£118.6m
0%
Strategic See below
33.3%
See tables below
1	 For the purpose of STIP, targets and actual performance for both underlying operating profit and free cash flow are measured on a constant currency basis, adjusted where appropriate 
for any M&A activity and, in the case of free cash flow, excludes interest and tax. The STIP targets and actual performance for underlying operating profit are measured before 
the impact of any share-based payment expense. Other adjustments are also made at the discretion of the Committee to ensure the outcome is a fair reflection of the underlying 
performance of the Group for the year. These are described on page 133 of this report.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
132

A summary of the strategic objectives applying to each Executive Director and the outcome is provided below:
Tony Wood
Chief Executive
Strategy
Deliver sustainability goals and enhance portfolio to 
underpin margin and earnings growth
Performance against objectives
•	 Implemented pricing review across all Product Groups.
•	 	Implemented pricing review across all Product Groups.
Customer
Increase satisfaction levels and grow aftermarket 
and defence
•	 Organic AM growth closed up 6.6% against a slower than 
anticipated recovery in air travel globally. Quality Escapes – 
significant improvement following Zero Defect Plan success 
closing the year 48% lower than target, with DPPM also better 
by 17%.
Competitiveness
Improve core business processes and efficiencies
•	 Successful transition of multiple business units to Ansty Park.
Culture
Improve employee engagement and embed high 
performance culture programmes
•	 Engagement index achieved all-time best result at 76% with 
a 73% response rate – a very good result in very challenging 
circumstances for the business given the extended pandemic 
and Parker-Hannifin deal impacts during the year.
•	 Lowest to date TRIR achieved at 0.63 and two key leadership 
and operations leadership training programmes successfully 
delivered and positively received by employees.
Louisa Burdett
Chief Financial Officer
Strategy 
Provide liquidity for the Company
Performance against objectives
•	 Implemented necessary financial arrangements in place to 
enable the business to operate safely through an extended 
pandemic and to position it with sufficient flexibility to operate 
successfully as civil aerospace recovers.
Customer
Support investors and MIS and FSSC as internal partners
•	 Managed investor messages during 2021 especially during 
acquisition discussions and supported ESG disclosures.
Competitiveness
Improve Meggitt’s recurring cost base
•	 Significant de-risking in UK pension plan liabilities.
•	 Implemented new Investment Committee.
•	 Lead the acquisition of HiETA.
Culture
Drive incremental change to impact overall score
•	 Improvements and automation delivering significant 
improvements in cash forecasting capability.
•	 Balance sheet reviews and an in-depth assessment of SOx 
in readiness for 2022 action.
The Committee sets the above stated objectives for the Executive Directors at the start of the year. In its adjudication of the 
outcome under the personal element of the STIP opportunity, the Committee also considered it appropriate to reflect the 
Executive Directors’ personal performance in the context of the evolution in short-term strategic priorities presented by the 
approaches from Parker-Hannifin and TransDigm. The Committee’s adjudication therefore reflects not only the basket of 
objectives outlined above, but also a qualitative overlay of the significant contribution made to protecting stakeholder interests 
throughout the year. This includes the significant value created through the potential transaction with Parker-Hannifin, which was 
strongly supported by shareholders, and the work undertaken to safeguard wider stakeholder interests, including employees, 
pension plan members, customers and suppliers, through the transaction should it proceed. In this context, the Committee 
assessed the performance of the Executive Directors to have significantly exceeded expectations. In line with the approach 
adopted for the wider STIP population, this rating outcome corresponds to full payout of the strategic element.
CEO and CFO payout based on assessment of objectives (% of element): 100%
As a result, the following STIP awards were received by Executive Directors in respect of 2021 performance:
Executive
% salary
£’000
Mr A Wood
70.1%
476
Mrs L S Burdett
70.1%
301
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
133
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
STIP – deferral into shares (audited)
As a result of the 2021 STIP outcome described above, and in line with the Remuneration Policy, 25% of the payout will be deferred 
into shares and released (with no further performance conditions attached) after two years. Deferred STIP awards may lapse in 
certain leaver circumstances.
Last year the Committee used its discretion to reduce the 2020 STIP vesting to zero. Accordingly, no deferred bonus share awards 
were made under the Share Incentive and Retention Plan during the 2021 financial year.
LTIP 2019 outcome
The LTIP award granted in April 2019 was subject to performance measures comprising three-year cumulative underlying EPS, 
three-year average ROCE and a scorecard of strategic measures. The outcome of the EPS measure has been adjusted for 
disposals. Performance against each of these measures over the completed performance period is summarised in the table below:
 
Performance period
Targets
Actual
% vesting
Element
2019
2020
2021   Weighting
Threshold
30%
Mid-point
65%
Stretch
100%
Performance
(of LTIP)
Underlying EPS (pence)
three-year aggregate
• 
•
w
33.3%
108.9
115.5
122.3
72.4
0.0%
ROCE % average over three years
• 
•
•
33.3%
12.1%
12.5%
12.9%
7.0%
0.0%
Strategic Measures1
• 
•
•
Programme excellence2
•
•
•
11.1%
2.0
3.0
4.0
2019: 3.1
7.3%
2020: 2.8
2021: 3.1
MPS3
•
•
7.4%
40%
50%
60%
2019: 50.0%
4.1%
2020: 44.6%
HPS (MPS) Quality4
•
1.9%
1,225
1,192
1,165
681
1.8%
HPS Delivery4
•
1.9%
74%
84%
94%
68%
0.0%
Inventory Turns5
•
•
•
11.1%
3.0
3.2
3.4
2019: 2.7
0.0%
2020: 2.1
2021: 2.1
Overall outcome
13.2%
1	 Progress against the targets for all strategic measures are assessed annually and the final vesting outcome is based on the average warranted outcome for performance in each year 
covered by the relevant measure. For example the score for MPS is the average vesting warranted by for delivering a score of 50% in 2019 and 44.6% in 2020 (being the two years of the 
2019 LTIP for which MPS targets were set). 
2	 Performance score out of 5. Programme excellence is the combined score of programmes and AR&T programmes (previously “innovation”) weighted 50/50. 
3	 Vesting is based on the number of our sites that have progressed up one stage of HPS in the year.
4	 HPS (Quality and Delivery) vesting is based on progress against specific targets in each of these areas. For each of these measures, vesting criteria were set at the start of the year and 
assessed at the end of the year and reviewed by internal audit.
5	 Cost of Sales as used in the inventory turns measure includes the impact of exceptional items.
Based on these performance outcomes, 13.2% of the 2019 LTIP award will vest. Details of the awards vesting for Executive 
Directors are set out in the table below:
Executive
Interests 
held
Vesting
%
Interests 
vesting
Date 
of vesting
Share price
at vesting1
Value
£’0002
Mr A Wood
278,443
13.2
36,754
08.04.2022
742.8p
275
Mrs L Burdett
176,389
13.2
23,283
08.04.2022
742.8p
174
1	 The market value of vested stock is based on the average share price over the last quarter of 2021.
2	 The value includes the accrued distribution payable on the shares that vest (equivalent to a dividend, paid as income) of £2k for Mr A Wood and £1k for Mrs L Burdett.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
134

LTIP – 2021 Restricted Share Award (RSA) Tranche 1
As set out in last year’s remuneration report, the 2021 RSA vests in equal instalments after 1, 2 and 3 years, subject to a 
discretionary assessment by the Committee of Meggitt’s performance against a basket of measures. The Committee evaluated 
a range of performance categories, including: balance sheet strength (management of interest cover to 2.4x, and safeguarding 
the balance sheet through successful RCF refinancing during the year); employee engagement scores (which increased in 41 of 42 
parameters); health & safety (our best TRIR results to date); customer measures (escapes and AM growth); and progress against 
our sustainability roadmap (exceeding our target for R&D expenditure in sustainable technologies, and ensuring no reputational 
incidents in the year). Following the Committee’s assessment of Meggitt’s overall performance against this range of categories in 
2021 it is confirmed that 100% of the first tranche of the 2021 RSA will vest in full as set out below: 
 
Executive
Interests 
held
Vesting
%
Interests 
vesting
Date 
of vesting
Share price
at vesting1
Value
£’000
Mr A Wood
29,292
100
29,292
29.04.2022
742.8p
218
Mrs L Burdett
18,556
100
18,556
29.04.2022
742.8p
138
1	 The market value of vested stock is based on the average share price over the last quarter of 2021.
Scheme interests awarded in the year ended 31 December 2021 (audited)
LTIP – Performance Share Award (PSA)
Executive Directors were each granted PSA awards in 2021. Vesting is dependent on the achievement of three-year targets ending 
on 31 December 2023. As disclosed in last year’s report, due to the impact of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee 
decided to delay setting the targets for the PSAs for 2021 until such time that it could finalise appropriate performance ranges. 
Awards were granted on 29 April 2021 and the accompanying market announcement set out full details of the targets applying to 
these awards, as below:
 
Weighting
Measure
Threshold1
Mid-point1
Stretch1
33.3%
Underlying EPS (pence) three-year cumulative
57.4
67.6
77.7
33.3%
ROCE average over three years
5.3%
6.8%
8.3%
Strategic measures:
11.1%
Programme excellence (programme performance on NPI and 
AR&T programme health, and progress with sustainable technology 
programmes)
2.0
3.0
4.0
11.1%
High Performance System	 Delivery Outcomes
	
	
	
Quality Outcomes
(outcomes are averaged based on our Company performance)
74%
1,225
84%
1,192
94%
1,165
11.1%
Inventory Turns
2.3
2.8
3.3
1	 Vesting is 25% at threshold, 62.5 at mid-point and 100% at stretch.
2021 PSA
Executive
Form of award
Date of award
Shares over which 
awards granted
Award price1
Face value
End of Performance 
Period
£’000
% of salary2
Mr A Wood
Conditional Award
29.04.2021
175,753
471.54p
829
125%
31.12.23
Mrs L S Burdett
Conditional Award
29.04.2021
111,337
471.54p
525
125%
31.12.23
1	 The award price is the average close price for the five days prior to the award date. The face value has been calculated using the award price for each award.
2	 Based on salary at the date of award.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
135
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
LTIP – Restricted Share Award (RSA)
Following shareholder approval of the new Remuneration Policy, Executive Directors were each granted RSA awards in 2021. 
Vesting of RSAs awards is subject to continued employment, but not any formal performance measures; however, the Committee 
has assessed the vesting based on a basket of measures, as adjusting these measures to be appropriate for the position in the 
recovery period. These measures have been disclosed on page 135. The balance and weighting of the factors may be adjusted as 
priorities for the Group develop over time to align with the anticipated recovery, and the Committee will consider performance 
in the round. The factors considered in the assessment will be fully disclosed in the relevant Annual Report. In order to address 
immediate issues of incentive and retention during the recovery period, and as disclosed last year, vesting of this first grant of RSA 
awards will occur on a phased basis over the three-year period, i.e. a third annually, but with release of the vested shares to remain 
at five years following grant owing to the application of the normal holding period.
2021 RSA
Executive
Form of award
Date of award
Shares over which 
awards granted
Award price1
Face value
Date of vesting
£’000
% of salary2
Mr A Wood
Conditional Award
29.04.2021
87,876
471.54p
414
62.5%
29.04.2022-
29.04.2024
Mrs L S Burdett
Conditional Award
29.04.2021
55,668
471.54p
262
62.5%
29.04.2022-
29.04.2024
1	 The award price is the average close price for the five days prior to the award date. The face value has been calculated using the award price for each award.
2	 Based on salary at date of grant.
Total pension entitlements (audited)
Mr Wood and Mrs Burdett received pensions allowances in 2021 of 18.0% and 17.5% of salary respectively. The pension allowance 
payments made in 2021 are included in the single total figure of remuneration table. Consistent with all employees, the Executive 
Directors received pension contributions and all other benefits based on their unreduced salary (and the data in the single total 
figure of remuneration reflects this).  
In 2022, Mr Wood and Mrs Burdett’s pension allowances are being reduced to 15% of salary. Neither Executive Director 
participates in a defined benefit pension. Further reductions to their pension allowances will be reviewed by the Committee later 
in 2022.
Share ownership guidelines (audited)
The minimum shareholding guideline for Executive Directors is 300% of base salary for the Chief Executive and 200% of base 
salary for the Chief Financial Officer. There is no set time frame within which Executive Directors have to meet the guideline, 
however, until they meet the guideline they are not permitted to sell more than 50% of the after-tax value of a vested share award.
Post-cessation shareholding guidelines of two years from vesting applies to the Executive Directors. Further information on their 
progress towards meeting their shareholding guidelines is set out below. The Executive Directors have each executed a deed 
under which they acknowledge and agree to the Company’s post-employment shareholding requirements and acknowledge 
that Meggitt reserves the right to take action to enforce compliance with the requirements. In the event of a breach of the post-
employment shareholding obligations, Meggitt reserves the right to require the individual to revoke any assignment, transfer 
or charge, or acquire shares to replace disposed shares. Meggitt may also apply malus against unvested awards. To date, no 
Executive Directors have left office following the introduction of our post-employment shareholding requirements.
As at 31 December 2021, the Chief Executive’s shareholding was 252% of base salary and the Chief Financial Officer’s shareholding 
was 32% of base salary.
Executive Director
Shareholding Guideline
(% 2021 salary)
Shareholding
Current Shareholding
(% 2021 salary)
Guideline Met?
Mr A Wood
300%
232,316
252%
Building
Mrs L S Burdett
200%
18,413
32%
Building
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
136

Executive Directors’ beneficial interests (audited)
The beneficial interests of the Executive Directors and their connected persons in the ordinary shares of the Group at 
31 December 2021, as notified under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) of the Financial Conduct Authority 
(FCA) (including shares held beneficially in the SIP by Executive Directors), were as follows:
Shareholding 
Ordinary shares of 5p each
Executive Director
2021
2020
Mr A Wood
123,348
43,291
Mrs L S Burdett
8,628
5,500
Between 1 January 2022 and 1 March 2022, the following changes to the interests of the Directors in the ordinary shares of the 
Company took place: 1) Mr Wood acquired 40 shares through the Meggitt PLC Share Incentive Plan; and 2) Mr Wood and Mrs 
Burdett retained 15,419 shares and 9,768 shares respectively following the vesting of their 2020 SIRP award on 28 February 2022.
Executive Directors’ shareholding requirements (audited)
Shares which are included within the shareholding requirement are:
Source of shares
Description
LTIP (PSA and RSA)
Shares awards that have vested but not been exercised on a net of tax basis and 
share awards that have been exercised and retained
SIRP (Deferred Bonus)
Share awards that have not vested on a net of tax basis and shares released after 
the two-year deferral period
Ordinary shares
Shares purchased directly in the market
Dividend reinvestment plan
Shares acquired through the dividend reinvestment plan 
SIP
Shares acquired under the SIP (including those held in trust)
Sharesave Scheme
Shares exercised and retained
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
137
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Executive Directors’ interests in share schemes (audited)
All outstanding LTIP PSA awards have performance conditions attached (as detailed in the Directors’ remuneration report in 
the year of grant and in this report for those awards made in 2021). The awards made up to and including 2018 have already 
vested to the extent detailed in this and previous reports and the figures shown in the table below for those years are the 
vested share award amounts. The awards made in 2019 and later years were unvested as at 31 December 2021. RSA awards (the 
first grant of which took place in 2021) are not subject to a formal performance condition. Sharesave awards are not subject to 
performance conditions.
Number of shares under award
Date of 
award
At 1 
January 
2021
Awarded 
Exercised
Lapsed
At 31 
December 
2021
Exercise 
price
Market price 
at date of 
exercise
Date 
exercisable 
from
Expiry 
Date
Mr A Wood
LTIP (2016)
1.12.16
112,506
0
-112,506
0
0
0
740.75p
1.12.19
1.12.21
LTIP (2017)1
7.4.17
142,837
0
0
0
142,837
0
n/a
7.4.20
7.4.22
LTIP (2018)1
3.4.18
332,852
0
0
-299,234
33,618
0
n/a
3.4.21
3.4.23
LTIP (2019)2
8.4.19
278,443
0
0
0
278,443
0
n/a
8.4.22
8.4.24
LTIP (2020)3
28.2.20
251,638
0
0
0
251,638
n/a
n/a
28.2.23
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)3
294.21
0
29,292
0
0
29,292
n/a
n/a
29.4.22
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)3
294.21
0
29,292
0
0
29,292
n/a
n/a
29.4.23
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)3 
294.21
0
29,292
0
0
29,292
n/a
n/a
29.4.24
n/a
LTIP (2021 – PSA)3
294.21
0
175,753
0
0
175,753
n/a
n/a
29.4.24
n/a
SIRP 2019
8.4.19
38,155
0
-38,155
0
0
n/a
n/a
8.4.21
n/a
SIRP 20203
28.2.20
29,146
0
0
0
29,146
n/a
n/a
28.2.22
n/a
Sharesave 20184
13.9.18
847
0
0
0
847 425.02p
n/a
1.11.21
1.5.22
Sharesave 20195
17.9.19
1,826
0
0
0
1,826 492.80p
n/a
1.11.24
1.5.25
Total
1,188,250
263,629
-150,661
-299,234
1,001,984
1	 Nil cost options – vested (unexercised).
2	 Nil cost options – unvested.
3	 Conditional award – unvested.
4	 Options – vested (unexercised).
5	 Options – unvested.
Number of shares under award
Date of 
award
At 1 
January 
2021
Awarded
Exercised
Lapsed
At 31 
December 
2021
Exercise 
price
Market price 
at date of 
exercise
Date 
exercisable 
from
Expiry 
Date
Mrs L S Burdett
LTIP (2019)1
8.4.19
176,389
0
0
0
176,389
n/a
n/a
8.4.22
8.4.24
LTIP (2020)2
28.2.20
159,409
0
0
0
159,409
n/a
n/a
28.2.23
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)2
294.21
0
18,556
0
0
18,556
n/a
n/a
294.22
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)2
294.21
0
18,556
0
0
18,556
n/a
n/a
294.23
n/a
LTIP (2021 – RSA)2
294.21
0
18,556
0
0
18,556
n/a
n/a
294.24
n/a
LTIP (2021 – PSA)2
294.21
0
111,337
0
0
111,337
n/a
n/a
294.24
n/a
SIRP (2019)
8.4.19
5,913
0
-5,913
0
0
n/a
n/a
8.4.21
n/a
SIRP (2020)2
28.2.20
18,463
0
0
0
18,463
n/a
n/a
28.2.22
n/a
Sharesave (2019)3
17.9.19
1,826
0
0
0
1,826 492.80p
–
1.11.24
1.5.25
Total
362,000
167,005
-5,913
0
523,092
1	 Nil cost options – unvested.
2	 Conditional award – unvested.
3	 Options – unvested.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
138

External appointments held by Executive Directors as at 31 December 2021
Executive Director
Company
Role
Fees retained 2021
£’000
Mr A Wood
National Grid plc
Non-Executive Director 
(from 1 September 2021)
Committee membership
30
5
35
Mrs L S Burdett
Electrocomponents plc
Non-Executive Director
Chair of Audit Committee
61
14
Total
75
Exit payments made in the year (audited)
No exit payments have been made in 2021.
Payments to past Directors (audited)
There were no payments to past Directors in 2021. A de minimis of £10,000 applies to all disclosures under this note.
Review of past performance
The remuneration package is structured to help ensure alignment with shareholders. However, there may be no direct correlation 
between share price movement and the change in the value of the pay package in any one year (as the remuneration package 
comprises several components, some fixed and others based on non-financial measures).
The graph below illustrates the Group’s performance compared to the FTSE 100 Index, which is considered an appropriate broad 
equity market index against which the Group’s performance should be measured. Performance, as required by legislation, is 
measured by TSR over the ten-year period from 31 December 2011 to 31 December 2021.
£
Value of £100 invested on 31 December 2010
Group Chief Executive’s single total
remuneration figure £'000
Meggitt
Mr T Twigger
Mr S G Young
Mr A Wood
FTSE 100
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
31/12/2021
31/12/2020
31/12/2019
31/12/2018
31/12/2017
31/12/2016
31/12/2015
31/12/2014
31/12/2013
31/12/2012
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
139
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Pay for performance history
The table below details the CEO’s single total figure of remuneration over the same period:
2012
2013
2014   
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Mr A Wood1
Single total figure of remuneration 
(£’000)
STIP outcome2
LTIP vesting2
2,334
82%
52.1%
1,949
68%
62.4%
925
0%
10.1%
1,737
70%
13.2%
Mr S G Young1
Single total figure of remuneration 
(£’000)
STIP outcome2
EPP vesting2
ESOS vesting2
LTIP vesting2
1,296
39%
38%
76%
–
1,232
23%
0%
0%
–
1,347
31%
0%
0%
–
1,969
60%
N/A
N/A
17.3%
2,040
68%
N/A
N/A
18.9%
Mr T Twigger1
Single total figure of remuneration 
(£’000)
STIP outcome2
EPP vesting2
ESOS vesting2
3,812
80%
88%
100%
1,845
35%
56%
98%
1	 Figures are provided for Mr T Twigger for the period up to 1 May 2013, for Mr S G Young for the period up to 31 December 2017 and for Mr A Wood from his appointment as CEO on 
1 January 2018.
2	 The outcomes are for those awards which are included in the single figure of remuneration for that year. For 2021, this represents the outcome of the 2019 LTIP and the 2021 STIP. 
Outcomes are expressed as a percentage of maximum.
Change in Executive Directors’ pay for the year in comparison to that of Meggitt employees
The table below shows the year-on-year percentage change in salary, benefits and annual bonus earned between the years ended 
31 December 2019 to 31 December 2021 for all Executive Directors compared to the change in earnings for employees of Meggitt 
PLC, and UK employees over the same periods.
Salary
Benefits
Annual Bonus
2020-2021
2019-2020
2020-2021
2019-2020
2020-20212
2019-2020
CEO
CFO
6.2%3
6.3%3
-9.5%
-10%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
n/a
n/a
-100%
-100%
Meggitt PLC Employees
UK Meggitt Employees
2.1%
0.4%
-3.2%
-0.5%
0.0%1
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
n/a
n/a
-100%
-100%
1	 Benefits changes for the PLC and All UK populations are based on value of entitlement, and exclude, for example, the change in Benefit in Kind value created by a change in 
Company Car.
2	 “n/a” for 2020-2021 reflects a nil bonus outcome for 2020 (the base year of the calculation).
3	 The % increases to CEO/CFO salaries in 2020/2021, reflect the material voluntary reductions taken in 2020/2021. Excluding those voluntary reductions, the increases in salary earnt by 
Executive Directors in 2020/2021 would have been in line with the Employee populations stated above.
A similar analysis is provided for the Non-Executive Directors on page 144.
CEO pay ratio
The lower quartile, median and upper quartile employees were determined using Calculation Method A, which involved calculating 
the actual full-time equivalent remuneration for all UK employees for the year ending 31 December 2021. Where variable pay data was 
available for the 2021 financial year outturn (to be paid in March 2022 in respect of executive and senior management annual bonus and 
LTIP), actual amounts were used. Where the outturn of variable pay for 2021 was unknown at the date of calculation (for managerial, 
professional and direct workforce), the amount to be paid in March 2022 was estimated.
From this analysis, three employees were then identified as representing the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the UK employee 
population. The Committee chose this method as it is the preferred approach of the Government and that of institutional 
shareholders, and Meggitt has the systems in place to undertake this method.
The three individuals identified were full-time employees during the year and did not receive any exceptional incentive award 
which would otherwise inflate their pay figures. No adjustments or assumptions were made by the Committee, with the total 
remuneration of these employees calculated in accordance with the methodology used to calculate the single figure of the Chief 
Executive. The calculation was made as at 31 December 2021 and the Committee considered the median pay ratio to be reflective 
of pay and progression policies, together in the context of the ratio reported in prior years as well as the figures produced by 
sector comparators and across the FTSE more generally.
The CEO pay ratio is based on comparing the Chief Executive’s pay to that of the Group’s UK-based workforce, a large proportion of whom 
are production workers. The Committee expects that the ratios will be largely driven by the Chief Executive’s incentive pay outcomes, 
which will likely lead to greater variability in his pay than that observed at lower levels who, consistent with market practices, have a greater 
proportion of their pay linked to fixed components. This expectation has been realised in the change between 2020 and 2021 ratios.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
140

The Committee takes into account these ratios when making decisions around the Executive Director pay packages, and the 
Group takes the need to ensure competitive pay packages across the organisation seriously.
Lower quartile (25th percentile)
Median
Upper quartile (75th percentile)
(£)
Method
Total Pay 
& Benefits
Total 
Salary
Total Pay 
& Benefits
Total 
Salary
Total Pay 
& Benefits
Total 
Salary
2021
A
35,376
33,637
44,570
40,016
60,952
52,206
2020
A
34,019
31,788
43,831
40,584
59,994
55,550
2019
A
32,879
27,986
42,861
41,317
58,479
52,776
(£)
Method
Pay Ratio 25th Percentile
Pay Ratio Median
Pay Ratio 75th Percentile
2021
A
47:1
38:1
28:1
20201
A
26:1
20:1
15:1
2019
A
59:1
45:1
33:1
1	 2020 Ratio has been updated due to the true up of the value at vesting of the 2018 LTIP. Prior reported ratio at median was 20:1.
Relative importance of spend on pay
The chart below shows shareholder distributions (i.e. dividends) and total employee expenditure for 2021 and the prior year, along 
with the percentage change in both.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Dividends1
£0.0m
£0.0m
0%
14.2%
£485.1m
£565.4m
Shareholder distributions
Employee costs2
2021
2020
1	 See Note 15 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
2	 Comprises wages and salaries and retirement benefit costs. See Note 8 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
2021 Committee evaluation
The Committee reviewed its own effectiveness and the effectiveness of their advisors using a detailed questionnaire and follow 
up discussion. Overall, the results of the review were positive, in what was another challenging year including the continued 
significant impact of COVID-19 on the aerospace market, and the Parker-Hannifin proposed acquisition, both of which had 
implications for remuneration, recruitment and retention across Meggitt. The response of the Committee was viewed as proactive 
and appropriate in these circumstances. 
Overall, the meetings were well run, with papers of the right length, and discussions being both well-informed and appropriately 
robust. The Committee considered it important to consider proactive and pragmatic approaches to remuneration structures, 
whilst also taking into account international aerospace and defence comparators.
Context for the Committee’s decisions in 2021
The Committee included regular updates from executive management on the experience of key stakeholders in Meggitt to 
ensure that this context was front of mind as the Committee discussed executive pay, with regular updates on impacts on wider 
stakeholders, including employees, shareholders, customers and suppliers. The Committee also considered reports from Ellason 
on the views of investors and investor advisory bodies on remuneration. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
141
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
2022 Policy implementation
Base salary, pension and benefits
With effect from 1 April 2022, the Executive Directors’ salaries will be increased by 3%, in line with the salary increases for the 
wider employee population effective from that date.
The following table shows the base salaries for the Executive Directors:
From 1 April 2022
£’000
%
change
From 1 October 2021
£’000
Mr A Wood
700
+3%
680
Mrs L S Burdett
443
+3%
431
The Committee periodically benchmarks Executive Director salaries against other FTSE companies of similar size, as well as a 
defined group of UK-listed industry comparators, comprising: BAE Systems, Halma, IMI, Melrose Industries, Rolls-Royce, Rotork, 
Senior, Spectris, Spirax-Sarco, Ultra Electronics and Weir Group.
From 1 January 2022, the Committee agreed a reduced pensions allowance for the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of 
15% of salary. There are no other changes to benefit provisions for 2022.
2022 Incentive Opportunities
No changes are proposed to the implementation of the 2021 Policy in 2022. The maximum STIP opportunity for Executive 
Directors will continue to be 150% of salary. Performance Share Awards (PSA) are expected to be granted with face values of 125% 
of salary for the Executive Directors, alongside Restricted Share Awards (RSA) with face values of 62.5% of salary.
2022 Incentive Plan Measures
Targets for the 2022 STIP and 2022 PSAs have been set following the usual methodology.
For 2022, the Committee has considered the increasing importance of ESG-related factors and has incorporated a new 
sustainability measure into the PSA scorecard. The 2022 goal is to reduce Meggitt’s gross Scope 1 & 2 carbon emissions 
(normalised for revenue, excluding carbon brake manufacturing) by 3% from 2022 levels. Carbon brake manufacturing 
emissions are excluded as they arise from the brake manufacturing process itself and specific projects are underway to review 
and reduce emissions from brake manufacturing. Strategic measures under the STIP for the Executive Directors also include 
sustainability goals.
STIP
STIP design for 2022 is unchanged from 2021, as follows:
•	 Underlying operating profit 33.3%
•	 Free cash flow 33.3%
•	 Strategic Objectives 33.3%
The STIP targets for 2022 are considered to be commercially sensitive, and will be disclosed, together with details of whether they 
have been met, in the 2022 Directors’ remuneration report (subject to them being no longer considered sensitive).
LTIP – Performance Share Awards
The measures for the 2022 PSAs are earnings per share (weighted one-third), ROCE (weighted one-third) and four strategic 
measures (weighted one-third in aggregate, and which include our High Performance System, programme excellence, 
sustainability and inventory):
•	 HPS: site specific Quality and Delivery targets measure two of the key outputs of HPS.
•	 Programme excellence: this measure scores the health of all of the Group’s programmes, including specific 
sustainability programmes.
•	 Sustainability: based on reducing gross Scope 1 & 2 carbon emissions (CO2e), normalised for revenue, excluding carbon 
brake manufacturing.
•	 Inventory: based on inventory turns.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
142

Targets
Weight
Threshold
Mid-point
Stretch Financial 
measures
EPS (3-year average)
33.33%
76.0p
89.4p
102.8p
ROCE (3-year average)
33.33%
7.1%
8.6%
10.1%
Strategic measures*
HPS – quality escapes
5.6%
666
646
626
HPS – on-time delivery
5.6%
74%
84%
94%
Programme excellence
5.6%
2.0
3.0
4.0
Sustainability
5.6%
2%
3%
4%
Inventory
11.1%
2.2
2.7
3.2
Total
100%
*	 The targets apply to year 1 of the 2022 PSA, and also apply to year 2 of the 2021 PSA and year 3 of the 2020 LTIP.
LTIP – Restricted Share Awards
Although not subject to any formal performance measures, the Committee will assess RSAs vesting based on a basket of  
measures, adjusting these measures to be appropriate for Meggitt’s stage in the recovery period. A wide range of business 
factors is expected to be considered including, free cash flow, balance sheet health, adherence to dividend policy and overall cash 
returns to shareholders, customer service, health and safety performance, ESG performance and corporate culture. The balance 
and weighting of the factors may be adjusted as priorities for the Group develop over time to align with the anticipated recovery, 
and the Committee will consider performance in the round. The factors considered in the application of discretion used will be 
fully disclosed in the relevant Annual Report.
Co-Operation Agreement with Parker-Hannifin 
The Committee took actions to apply our Directors’ Remuneration Policy appropriately and in shareholders’ best interests 
in the context of the proposed acquisition for the Company by Parker-Hannifin which was approved by our shareholders in 
September 2021. 
All incentive plan outcomes for executives in the context of the transaction will be appropriately assessed by the Committee 
against the relevant performance conditions (and subject to time pro-rating) prior to completion of the transaction which is 
anticipated in Q3 2022. Complete details of the remuneration arrangements agreed by Meggitt and Parker-Hannifin relating 
to the offer for the Company are detailed in the Co-Operation Agreement for the transaction which is available to view at 
www.meggittoffer.com. 
Owing to the lengthy regulatory process prior to completion, and as set out in the Co-Operation Agreement, the Committee 
intends to operate the STIP and LTIP as normal in 2022 up until the deal completes. Further information is included in the STIP/
LTIP sections in this report.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
143
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Non-Executive Directors
Chairman and Non-Executive Director fee structure for 2021 and 2022
In Q1 2021, it was agreed to continue to freeze fees at 2020 levels, and to apply a 10% fee reduction from 1 January 2021 to 
30 June 2021, aligned with the 10% voluntary unpaid leave reduction for Executive Directors. 
On 1 October 2021, the Chairman and Non-Executive Director fees were increased by 2.5% from 2020 levels, consistent with the 
delayed increase awarded to the wider workforce.
The Committee has approved a 3% increase to the Chairman’s fee with effect from 1 April 2022, in line with the salary increases 
for the wider employee population effective from that date. The Finance Committee approved the same increase to the Non-
Executive Director base fee from that date.
The fee structure and levels for the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors in 2022 and 2021 (not including COVID-19 reductions) 
are as follows:
20221
£’000
20211
£’000
Chairman fee2
366
364
Non-Executive Director base fee3
61
60
Additional fee for chairing Audit or Remuneration Committee
11
11
Additional fee for chairing Corporate Responsibility Committee and 
Non-Executive Director responsible for Employee Engagement
11
11
Additional fee for Senior Independent Director
11
11
1	 Fees shown are effective for a year from 1 April.
2	 Sir Nigel Rudd receives additional benefits of £20,000 per annum for secretarial and car services required for business purposes.
3	 A fee of £4,000 is paid per meeting to non-UK Directors when travelling to meetings outside of their home continent.
Single total figure of remuneration Non-Executive Directors (audited)
The table below sets out a single figure for the total remuneration received by each Non-Executive Director in 2021 and 2022:
20211
£’000
20201
£’000
Sir Nigel Rudd
Mr G S Berruyer
Mr C R Day
Mrs N L Gioia1
Ms A J P Goligher
Mr G Hachey1
Mrs C L Silver
348
61
69
69
76
57
57
328
65
65
62
65
58
54
1	 Includes fees to cover the cost of attendance at meetings that took place outside continent of residence.
Change in Non-Executive Directors’ pay for the year in comparison to that of Meggitt employees
The table below shows the year-on-year percentage change in fees earned between the years ended 31 December 2019 to 
31 December 2021 for all Non-Executive Directors compared to the change in salary, benefits and annual bonus for Meggitt PLC 
employees, and all Meggitt UK employees over the same periods.
Salary
Benefits
Annual Bonus
2020-2021
2019-2020
2020-2021
2019-2020
2020-2021
2019-2020
Sir Nigel Rudd
Mr G S Berruyer
Mr C R Day
Mrs N L Gioia
Ms A J P Goligher
Mr G Hachey
Mrs C L Silver
6%
-6%
6%
11%
17%
-2%
6%
-9%
-4%
-8%
-26%
-4%
-34%
32%
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Meggitt PLC employees
UK Meggitt employees
2.1%
0.4%
-3.2%
-0.5%
0%
0%
n/a
n/a
0%
0%
-100%
-100%
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
144

Non-Executive Directors’ beneficial interests (audited)
The beneficial interests of the Non-Executive Directors and their connected persons in the ordinary shares of the Group at 
31 December 2021, as notified under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) of the Financial Conduct Authority 
(FCA), were as follows:
Shareholding 
Ordinary shares of 5p each
2021
2020
Sir Nigel Rudd
Mr G S Berruyer
Mr C R Day
Mrs N L Gioia
Ms A J P Goligher
Mr G Hachey
Mrs C L Silver
250,000
38,000
76,937
3,188
6,000
3,000
5,000
250,000
38,000
76,937
3,188
6,000
3,000
5,000
Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2022, there were no changes in the beneficial interests of the Non-Executive Directors in 
the ordinary shares of the Company.
Other disclosures
Advisors to the Committee
Ellason LLP was appointed as the independent remuneration advisor to the Committee effective 1 January 2021 as a result of 
a competitive tender run by the Committee for remuneration advisory services in H2 2020. The Committee undertakes due 
diligence periodically to ensure that Ellason is independent and that the advice provided is impartial and objective. During 2021, 
Ellason provided independent advice including support on the review of the Remuneration Policy and consultation, remuneration 
provisions as part of the proposed acquisition by Parker-Hannifin, updates on the external remuneration environment and 
Directors’ remuneration report drafting support. Ellason reports directly to the Chair of the Remuneration Committee and does 
not advise the Company on any other issues. Their total fees for the provision of remuneration services to the Committee in 2021 
were £46,085 (2020: £81,117 to previous advisors, Mercer) on the basis of time and materials.
Ellason is member and signatory of the Code of Conduct for Remuneration Consultants, details of which can be found at 
www.remunerationconsultantsgroup.com. None of the individual Directors have any direct personal connections with Ellason.
AGM voting
The following table shows the results of the advisory vote on the 2020 Directors’ remuneration report at the 2021 AGM:
Resolution text
Votes 
for
% of votes 
cast for
Votes 
against
% of votes 
cast against
Total 
votes cast
Votes
withheld1
(abstentions)
Approval of Directors’ 
remuneration report
603,974,822
95.82
26,349,305
4.18
630,324,127
5,384,782
1	 A withheld vote is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the proportion of votes cast for and against a resolution.
The following table shows the results of the binding vote on the Directors’ Remuneration Policy at the 2021 AGM:
Resolution text
Votes 
for
% of votes 
cast for
Votes 
against
% of votes 
cast against
Total 
votes cast
Votes
withheld1
(abstentions)
Approval of Directors’ 
remuneration policy
477,572,623
75.66
153,628,927
24.34
631,201,550
4,507,829
1	 A withheld vote is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the proportion of votes cast for and against a resolution.
Following the AGM, the Committee reviewed shareholder feedback in relation to the remuneration resolutions, as described in 
the Chair’s introduction to this report. The Committee acknowledges the differing views of shareholders regarding the use of 
multiple long-term incentive vehicles, but believes this to be appropriate in facilitating Meggitt’s ability to compete effectively in 
its key talent markets to attract motivate and retain talent. We remain committed to keeping under review our approach during 
the life of the Policy.
Remuneration Policy
The Policy that was approved by shareholders at the AGM on 29 April 2021 is reproduced in full below. The only change is the 
update to the pay scenario charts to reflect 2022 remuneration and updating the pension allowance rates payable in 2022. 
The Policy is effective for a period of up to three years from the date it was approved. In developing the 2021 Remuneration 
Policy, the Committee took into account the provisions of the Code. The Policy is compliant with the Code, with the exception of 
Provision 38 on pension allowances. We recap below our assessment of how we believe the current Policy complies with Provision 
40 of the Code.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
145
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Clarity: Our approach to remuneration disclosure and decision-making is transparent and supported by clear rationale. We remain 
committed to consulting shareholders on the Policy (and any changes to it), as well as our approach – and material revisions – to 
how it is implemented.
Simplicity: The Remuneration Policy and our approach to implementation is logical and well understood internally, as well 
as externally. The performance measures used in the STIP and LTIP are well aligned to the Group’s strategy, as illustrated on 
page 129.
Risk: The Committee regularly reviews remuneration arrangements to ensure that these continue to drive an appropriate focus 
on performance (through short- and long-term performance-based incentives), without encouraging and rewarding excessive 
risk taking (for example, by having an element of longer-term variable remuneration – restricted shares – linked to continued 
employment only). We set incentive targets to be stretching and achievable, while retaining appropriate discretion to adjust 
formulaic bonus and LTIP outcomes to ensure that pay reflects underlying performance.
Predictability: Incentive opportunities are capped, with clearly defined payout schedules aiding participants’ understanding 
of how incentives operate and the performance expectations attaching to these. The use of restricted share awards, further 
enhances the predictability of pay outcomes.
Proportionality: Performance ranges are calibrated to ensure that incentive outcomes do not reward poor performance. The use 
of sliding scales helps ensure that incremental performance is incentivised and rewarded by incremental reward, while discretion 
helps safeguard against the possibility that pay outcomes are disproportionate to performance outcomes.
Culture: The Policy is consistent with Meggitt’s culture and strategy, and it reflects our approach to remuneration across the 
Group more widely. This consistency of approach aligns the focus of our employees and drives collective behaviours that promote 
the long-term success of the Company for the benefit of all stakeholders.
Remuneration Policy 
Executive Directors’ Policy Table
Base salary
Function
To attract and retain talent by ensuring base salaries are competitive in the relevant 
talent market.
Operation
Salary will be reviewed by the Committee annually, in February, with changes effective 
from 1 April of that year. Salaries for the year under review are disclosed in the annual 
report on remuneration.
In deciding salary levels, the Committee considers personal performance including 
how the individual has helped to support the strategic objectives of the Group. 
The Committee will also consider employment conditions and salary levels across the 
Group, prevailing market conditions, and market data for FTSE companies in similar 
industries and those with similar market capitalisation.
Salaries are paid to existing Executive Directors in GBP, however the Committee reserves 
the right to pay future and existing Executive Directors in any other currency (converted 
at the prevailing market rate when a change is agreed).
Opportunity 
The percentage salary increases for Executive Directors will not exceed those of the 
wider workforce over the life of this Remuneration Policy in the normal course of business. 
Higher increases may be awarded (i.e. in excess of the wider employee population) in 
instances where, for example, there is a material change in the responsibility, size or 
complexity of the role, or if a new Executive Director was intentionally appointed on 
a below-market salary. The Committee will provide the rationale for any such higher 
increases in the relevant year’s annual report on remuneration.
Performance metrics
None explicitly, but salaries are independently benchmarked periodically against FTSE 
companies in similar industries and those with similar market capitalisation. 
Personal performance is also taken into account when considering salary increases.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
146

Pension
Function
To provide post-retirement benefits for executive directors in a cost-efficient manner.
Operation
The pension plans operated by the Group, of which Executive Directors are or could be 
members, are:
•	 Meggitt Pension Plan (defined benefit pension plan, closed to new members).
•	 Meggitt Workplace Savings Plan (defined contribution personal pension scheme, open 
to new members).
Salary is the only element of remuneration that is pensionable. There are no unfunded 
pension promises or similar arrangements for Directors.
Opportunity 
New directors are eligible for a pension allowance at the same level as the wider 
workforce. In 2022, for incumbent Executive Directors, the pension allowance will be 15% 
of salary. 
Performance metrics
None.
Benefits
Function
To provide market-competitive benefits for Executive Directors.
Operation
The Group may provide benefits including, but not limited to, a company car or car 
allowance, private medical insurance, permanent health insurance, life assurance, a fuel 
allowance, a mobile phone, relocation costs and any other future benefits made available 
either to all employees globally or all employees in the region in which the Executive 
Director is employed.
Opportunity
Benefits vary by role and individual circumstances; eligibility and cost is reviewed 
periodically. Benefits in respect of the year under review are disclosed in the annual report 
on remuneration. It is not anticipated that the costs of benefits provided will increase 
significantly in the financial years over which this Remuneration Policy will apply, although 
the Committee retains discretion to approve a higher cost in exceptional circumstances 
(e.g. to facilitate recruitment, relocation, expatriation, etc.) or in circumstances where 
factors outside the Group’s control have changed materially (e.g. market increases in 
insurance costs).
Performance metrics
None.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
147
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Annual bonus – Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP)
Function
To incentivise Executive Directors to deliver annual financial and strategic objectives.
Operation
Performance measures, targets and weightings are set at the start of the year.
The performance period of the STIP is a financial year. After the end of the financial year, 
to the extent that the performance criteria have been met, 75% of the STIP Award is paid 
in cash to the Director (or at the discretion of the Committee, in shares). The remaining 
25% of the award will be deferred into shares and released (with no further performance 
conditions attached and no matching shares provided) after a further period of two years.
Under the STIP, the Committee may decide to apply malus and/or clawback to STIP Awards 
and deferred STIP Awards to reduce the vesting of awards and/or require repayment of 
awards in the event of:
(a) The participant leaves employment and facts emerge which, if known earlier, would have 
caused the award to lapse or caused the Committee to exercise discretion differently.
(b) Any error in the assessment of a performance condition or vesting calculation 
that resulted in an overpayment.
(c) The Group being the subject of a regulatory investigation or in breach of any applicable 
laws, rules or codes of conduct or the standards reasonably expected of it.
(d) A material failure of risk management for any period which caused serious harm to the 
reputation of the Group and/or significant financial loss to the Group.
(e) A serious breach of health and safety which caused serious harm to the reputation of the 
Group and/or significant financial loss to the Group.
(f) The Committee determines that the underlying financial health of the Group has 
significantly deteriorated such that there are severe financial constraints on payment 
of awards.
(g) The participant, after having left employment, is found to be in breach of any restrictive 
covenant, non-solicitation, anti-disparagement or confidentiality undertakings.
Deferred STIP Awards may lapse in certain leaver circumstances.
Opportunity 
The STIP provides for a maximum award opportunity of up to 150% of salary in normal 
circumstances, with an on-target opportunity of 100% of salary and an opportunity of 50% 
of salary at threshold performance.
The Committee has discretion to make a STIP award of up to 200% of salary in exceptional 
circumstances (e.g. a substantial contract win which has a significant positive financial 
impact in the long term but which has no, or negative, short-term financial impact).
Dividends accrue on unvested deferred STIP awards over the vesting period and are 
released on the vesting date.
Performance metrics
STIP awards are based on the achievement of financial and strategic performance targets. 
For Executive Directors, the STIP will be based on a combination of the financial performance 
of the Group and strategic performance. The relative weightings of the financial and strategic 
elements for any STIP period, and the measures used to assess financial and non-financial 
performance, will be set by the Committee in its absolute discretion to align with the Group’s 
operating and strategic priorities for that year. However, the weighting for strategic performance 
will not exceed one-third of the maximum STIP opportunity in any year.
The award for performance under each element of the STIP will be calculated independently. 
The Committee has discretion to review the consistency of the payout of the financial and 
strategic elements and adjust the total up or down (within the levels specified above) if it does not 
consider this to be a fair reflection of the underlying performance of the Group or the individual.
The strategic performance element will typically be based on three to five objectives, 
both financial and strategic, relevant to the Executive Director’s role cascaded from the 
Group’s strategy.
Details of the measures, weightings and targets applicable to the STIP for each year, including a 
description of how they were chosen and whether they were met, will be disclosed retrospectively 
in the annual report on remuneration for the following year (subject to commercial sensitivity).
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
148

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Function
To align the interests of Executive Directors with shareholders in growing the value of the 
Group over the long term.
Operation
Under the LTIP, Executive Directors are eligible to receive annual awards over the 
Company’s shares normally vesting after three years.
Two different types of awards can be granted:
1. Performance Share Awards (PSAs) which are subject to the achievement of stretching 
performance targets.
2. Restricted Share Awards (RSAs) for which vesting levels are subject to a general 
assessment by the Committee as to overall performance and any other wider 
considerations. The Committee has discretion to apply additional conditions to some 
or all of an RSA.
Under the LTIP rules, the Committee may decide to apply malus and/or clawback to 
awards to reduce the vesting of awards and/or require repayment of awards in the 
event of:
(a) The participant leaves employment and facts emerge which, if known earlier, 
would have caused the award to lapse or caused the Committee to exercise 
discretion differently.
(b) Any error in the assessment of a performance condition or vesting calculation that 
resulted in an overpayment.
(c) The Group being the subject of a regulatory investigation or in breach of any 
applicable laws, rules or codes of conduct or the standards reasonably expected of it.
(d) A material failure of risk management for any period which caused serious harm to the 
reputation of the Group and/or significant financial loss to the Group.
(e) A serious breach of health and safety which caused serious harm to the reputation of 
the Group and/or significant financial loss to the Group.
(f) The Committee determines that the underlying financial health of the Group has 
significantly deteriorated such that there are severe financial constraints on payment 
of awards.
(g) The participant, after having left employment, is found to be in breach 
of any restrictive covenant, non-solicitation, anti-disparagement or 
confidentiality undertakings.
PSAs and RSAs made to Executive Directors are subject to a holding period after the 
vesting period, normally a two-year period after a three-year vesting period but, in any 
case, the vesting plus holding period will always be no shorter than five years from grant.
Opportunity 
Executive Directors will normally be eligible for annual LTIP awards of 250% of salary. 
RSAs will be granted at a discount of 50% of the regular PSA, i.e. a regular award of 250% 
value would be made up of 125% of salary PSA and 62.5% of salary RSA. Awards (PSA 
and RSA combined) up to a maximum of 300% of salary may be granted in exceptional 
circumstances (e.g. to support the recruitment of a key executive or to recognise 
exceptional individual performance).
25% of a PSA will vest if performance against each performance condition is at threshold 
and 100% if each is at maximum, with straight-line vesting in between.
Dividends accrue on unvested awards granted under the LTIP (i.e. PSA and RSA) over 
the vesting period and are released, to the extent the award vests, on the vesting/
exercise date.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
149
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) continued
Performance metrics
Vesting of PSAs is subject to continued employment and performance against corporate 
measures, which are intended to be as follows for awards made over the life of the 
Remuneration Policy but are subject to change at the discretion of the Committee:
•	 Earnings per Share (EPS).
•	 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE).
•	 Strategic goals (typically but not always to be based on strategic priorities around 
execution, growth and innovation), which will be explained in the relevant annual report 
on remuneration.
It is the intention that the weighting of the measures will be equal (e.g. one-third each 
if three measures are used) but that the Committee will consider, and adjust if deemed 
appropriate, the weighting at the start of each LTIP cycle.
PSAs made under the LTIP have a performance period of three financial years, starting 
from 1 January of the year in which the award is made and ending on 31 December of the 
third year. If conditions are not met at the end of the relevant performance period, awards 
will lapse.
Vesting of the strategic objectives element will also be subject to a discretionary 
assessment by the Committee of the extent to which achievement is consistent with the 
Group’s underlying financial performance over the three-year period.
The measures and targets in operation for the PSAs, and which are not deemed 
commercially sensitive, are normally disclosed in the annual report on remuneration for the 
relevant year of grant. Any commercially sensitive information on measures, targets and 
performance will be disclosed retrospectively.
Vesting of RSAs is subject to a general underpin allowing the Committee to adjust vesting 
if business performance, individual performance or wider considerations mean, in its view, 
that an adjustment is required. Any vesting is also subject to any other conditions set by the 
Committee at grant.
Sharesave Scheme and Share Incentive Plan (SIP)
Function
To align the interests of employees and shareholders by encouraging all employees to 
own the Company’s shares.
Operation
Sharesave Scheme – All-employee scheme under which all UK employees (including UK 
Executive Directors) may save up to a maximum monthly savings limit over a period of 
three or five years. Options under the Sharesave Scheme are granted up to a discount of 
up to 20% to the market value of shares at the date of grant.
SIP – All-employee scheme under which: (i) all UK employees (including UK Executive 
Directors) may contribute up to a monthly maximum to purchase shares monthly from 
pre-tax pay; and (ii) all UK employees (including UK Executive Directors) may receive free 
shares up to an annual maximum value.
Opportunity 
Savings, contributions and free shares are capped at or below the legislative maximum for 
tax-qualifying approved share plans at the time UK employees are invited to participate.
Performance metrics
None.
Notes to the Policy table
The Committee is satisfied that the above Remuneration Policy is in the best interests of shareholders and does not promote 
excessive risk-taking. The Committee retains discretion to make minor, non-significant changes to the Policy without reverting 
to shareholders.
Consideration of shareholder views
The Committee Chair is available to discuss remuneration matters with the Group’s major shareholders and is also regularly 
updated on feedback on remuneration received by the Chairman of the Board and Executive Directors directly from shareholders. 
The Committee Chair ensures the Committee is kept informed of shareholder views.
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
150

External appointments
In cases of hiring or appointing a new Executive Director from outside the Group, the Committee may make use of all existing 
components of remuneration, as follows:
Component
Approach
Maximum annual
grant value
Base salary
The base salaries of new appointees will be determined based on the experience 
and skills of the individual, internal comparisons, employment conditions and 
salary levels across the Group and prevailing market conditions. Initial salaries may 
be set below market conditions and consideration given to phasing any increases 
over two or three years subject to development in the role.
N/A
Pension
In line with the Remuneration Policy, new appointees will be entitled to become 
members of the Meggitt Workplace Savings Plan (defined contribution plan) or 
receive a cash pension allowance at the same level as the wider workforce in lieu 
of salary.
N/A
Benefits/ 
Sharesave/SIP
New appointees will be eligible to receive benefits in line with the Remuneration 
Policy and any applicable UK all-employee share plans.
N/A
STIP
The structure described in the Remuneration Policy table will apply to new 
appointees with the relevant maximum being pro-rated to reflect the proportion 
of the year worked. Targets for the strategic element will be tailored to the 
appointee.
150% of salary 
(200% in exceptional 
circumstances)
LTIP
New appointees will be granted awards under the LTIP on similar terms as other 
Executive Directors, as described in the Remuneration Policy table.
250% of salary (300%, 
combined, in exceptional 
circumstances)
In determining the appropriate remuneration structure and levels, the Committee will take into consideration all relevant factors 
to ensure that arrangements are in the best interests of shareholders and employees. The Committee may make an award in 
respect of a new appointment to “buy out” incentive arrangements forfeited on leaving a previous employer, i.e. over and above 
the approach outlined in the table above. Any such compensatory awards will be made under the Group’s existing share plans, 
where appropriate, and will be subject to the normal rules and performance conditions of those schemes.
The Committee may also consider it appropriate to structure “buy-out” awards differently to the structure described in the 
Remuneration Policy table, exercising the discretion available under UKLA Listing Rule 9.4.2 R where necessary to make a one-off 
award to an Executive Director in the context of recruitment. In doing so, the Committee will consider relevant factors including 
any performance conditions attached to these awards, the likelihood of those conditions being met and the proportion of the 
vesting period remaining. The value of any such “buy-out” will be fully disclosed.
Internal promotion
Where a new Executive Director is appointed by way of internal promotion, the Remuneration Policy will be consistent with that for 
external appointees as detailed above. Any commitments made prior to an individual’s promotion will continue to be honoured 
even if they would not otherwise be consistent with the Remuneration Policy prevailing when the commitment is fulfilled although 
the Group may, where appropriate, seek to revise an individual’s existing service contract on promotion to ensure it aligns with 
other Executive Directors and prevailing market best practice.
Disclosure of the remuneration structure of any new Executive Director, including details of any exceptional payments, will be 
disclosed either in the RNS notification made at the time of appointment or in the annual report on remuneration for the year in 
which the recruitment occurred.
Approach to performance measure selection and target setting
Performance measures have been selected to closely align with and reinforce our strategic priorities (see pages 24 to 25).
Targets applying to the STIP and PSAs are reviewed annually, based on a number of internal and external reference points, including the 
Group’s strategic plan, analyst forecasts for the Group and its sector comparators, historical growth achieved by the Group and its 
sector comparators, market practice and external expectations for growth in our markets.
STIP
The performance measures used in the STIP reflect financial targets for the year and non-financial performance objectives  The 
Remuneration Policy provides the Committee with flexibility to select appropriate measures on an annual basis. STIP performance 
targets are set to be stretching but achievable, with regard to the particular strategic performance objectives and the economic 
environment in a given year. For financial measures, “target” is based around the annual budget approved by the Board. Prior to 
the start of the financial year, the Committee sets an appropriate performance range around target, which it considers provides an 
appropriate degree of “stretch” challenge and an incentive to outperform.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
151
Directors’ Report

Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Directors’ Report
STIP strategic measures are set each year under the themes of our four strategic blue chips: Strategy, Customer, Competitiveness 
and Culture. Each year every Executive Director is assigned measures against these themes which will drive the long-term success 
of the Group. These measures are then cascaded through the Executive Committee and beyond using a policy deployment 
matrix to ensure alignment across the entire organisation to the Group’s strategic priorities. Strategic measures are disclosed 
retrospectively when they are considered not to be commercially sensitive.
LTIP – PSA
It is intended that the vesting of PSAs made during the life of this Remuneration Policy will be linked to EPS, ROCE and the 
achievement of long-term strategic goals, but may also include other measures to enable the PSA to reinforce appropriate 
financial and non-financial objectives aligned with our strategy. EPS is considered by the Board to be the most important measure 
of our financial performance. It is highly visible internally, is regularly monitored and reported and is strongly motivational for 
participants. EPS targets will continue to be set on a nominal cumulative (pence) basis to incentivise consistent performance and 
reflect the fact that our profits are generated to a large degree outside the UK and not significantly influenced by UK retail price 
inflation. ROCE helps to balance the achievement of growth and returns. The Committee believes ROCE is a good proxy for total 
shareholder return (TSR) which focuses executives on managing the balance sheet and the Group’s operational performance. 
For Executive Directors, the use of ROCE targets reflects the fact that acquisition decisions come within the collective 
responsibility of the Board.
The Committee believes that the strategic goals component helps reinforce the realisation of the Group’s strategy and the 
achievement of key non-financial and strategic goals over long product cycles which drive long-term value for the Group. 
This element will typically comprise a scorecard of three-year targets across a maximum of three core strategic areas for 
the Group. The Committee believes that this approach enables it to reflect the Group’s long-term nature and shifting 
strategic priorities in the PSA to ensure executives’ interests remain closely aligned with those of our shareholders over time. 
Specific measures and targets for each area will be developed and clearly defined at the start of each three-year cycle to balance 
leading and lagging indicators of performance. Vesting of this element is subject to a discretionary assessment by the Committee 
of the extent to which achievement of the strategic objectives is consistent with the Group’s underlying financial performance over 
the performance period.
LTIP – RSA
The vesting of the RSAs is subject to a discretionary assessment of “corporate health” by the Committee, taking into account a 
wide range of business factors including, but not limited to, free cash flow, balance sheet health, adherence to dividend policy and 
overall cash returns to shareholders, customer service, health and safety performance, ESG performance and corporate culture. 
The balance and weighting of the factors may be adjusted as priorities for the Group develop over time, and the Committee will 
consider performance in the round.
Pay-for-performance: scenario analysis
The charts below provide an estimate of the potential future reward opportunities for the Executive Directors and the potential 
split between the different elements of remuneration under three different performance scenarios: “Minimum”, “On-target” and 
“Maximum”. This chart also shows the effect of future share price increases on executive pay outcomes under The Companies 
(Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018. Potential reward opportunities are based on the Policy, applied to 2022 base salaries. 
Note that the awards granted under the LTIP in a year will not normally vest until the third anniversary of the date of grant and the 
projected value excludes the impact of dividend accrual.
2022 pay scenario summaries
Max+50% SP
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
57%
35%
8%
33%
22%
5%
3%
3%
32% 10% 20%
33%
27%
14%
34%
27%
17%
£1,221
£2,114
£3,091
£3,729
19%
Salary and benefits
Pension
STIP
PSA
RSA
Max+50% SP
Maximum
On-target
Minimum
57% 8% 35%
33%
23%
5%
33%
3%
32% 10% 20%
27%
14%
£779
£1,345
£1,964
£2,368
19% 3%
27%
34%
17%
Mr A Wood (£’000)
Mrs L Burdett (£’000)
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
152

The following assumptions have been made in compiling the charts:
Scenario
Minimum
On-target
Maximum
Maximum +50% 
share price increase
Fixed pay
Latest known base salary,
pension and value of 
benefits
Latest known base salary, 
pension and value of 
benefits
Latest known base salary, 
pension and value of 
benefits
Latest known base 
salary, pension and 
value of benefits
STIP
No STIP payable
On-target STIP payable 
(67% of maximum)
Maximum STIP payable
Maximum STIP payable
LTIP
PSA – Threshold not 
achieved (0% vesting)
PSA – Performance 
warrants threshold 
vesting (25%)
PSA – Performance 
warrants full vesting 
(100%)
PSA and RSA warrants 
full vesting plus 50% 
share price appreciation 
on all awards
RSA – it is assumed that 
the Committee did not 
exercise its discretion to 
adjust vesting levels
RSA – it is assumed that 
the Committee did not 
exercise its discretion to 
adjust vesting levels
RSA – it is assumed that 
the Committee did not 
exercise its discretion to 
adjust vesting levels
Exercise of discretion
The Committee will operate the Group’s incentive plans according to their respective rules and the Remuneration Policy set out 
above, and in accordance with the Listing Rules and HMRC rules, where relevant. The Group’s incentive plans enable the use 
of discretionary override and the Directors to exercise independent judgement and discretion when authorising remuneration 
outcomes, taking account of Group and individual performance, and wider circumstances. In line with common market practice, 
the Committee retains discretion as to the operation and administration of these incentive plans, including routine administration 
matters such as the participating employees, timing of awards and the manner in which they are settled. The Committee also 
retains discretion over the choice of performance measures and targets in accordance with the Remuneration Policy set out above 
and the rules of each plan and the measurement of performance in the event of a variation of share capital, change of control, 
special dividend, distribution or any other corporate event which may affect the current or future value of an award.
The Committee also has discretion over determination of a “good leaver” (in addition to any specified categories) for incentive 
plan purposes, based on the rules of each plan and the circumstances of the individual leaving and adjustments required in 
certain circumstances (e.g. rights issues, share buybacks, special dividends, other corporate events, etc.).
Any use of the above discretion in relation to the Executive Directors would, where relevant, be explained in the annual report on 
remuneration for the year in which the discretion was exercised. As appropriate, it might also be the subject of consultation with 
the Group’s major shareholders.
Minor changes
The Committee may make minor amendments to the rules of the Group’s incentive plans (for regulatory, exchange control, 
tax or administrative purposes or to take account of a change in legislation) without requiring prior shareholder approval for 
that amendment.
Service contracts and exit payment policy
Executive Director service contracts, including arrangements for early termination, are carefully considered by the Committee and 
are designed to recruit, retain and motivate Directors of the quality required to manage the Group.
The Committee’s policy is that Executive Directors’ service contracts should be terminable on no more than 12 months’ notice.
The Committee’s approach to payments in the event of termination of employment of an Executive Director is to take account of 
the particular circumstances, including the reasons for termination, individual performance, contractual obligations and the rules 
of the Group’s applicable incentive plans which apply to awards held by the Executive Directors:
•	 Compensation for loss of office in service contracts
Except as set out in the table below, under the terms of their service contracts, the Executive Directors may be required to work 
during their notice period or may, if the Group decides, be paid in lieu of notice if not required to work the full notice period. 
Payment in lieu of notice will be equal to base salary plus the cost to the Group of providing the contractual benefits (pensions 
allowance, health insurance and company car or car allowance) that would otherwise have been paid or provided during the 
notice period.
Payments will be in equal monthly instalments and will be subject to mitigation such that payments will either reduce, or stop 
completely, if the Executive Director obtains alternative employment. An Executive Director’s employment can be terminated 
by the Group without notice or payment in lieu of notice in specific circumstances including summary dismissal, bankruptcy 
or resignation.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
153
Directors’ Report

•	 Treatment of STIP
Executive directors have no automatic entitlement to any bonus on termination of employment under the STIP, but the Committee may 
use its discretion to award a bonus (normally pro-rated). Where any bonus is deferred into shares, the award will normally lapse if an 
Executive Director’s employment terminates unless the Executive Director leaves for specified reasons. The “good leaver” reasons are 
death, redundancy, retirement, injury, disability, the business or company which employs the Executive Director ceasing to be part of the 
Group or any other circumstances in which the Committee exercises discretion to treat the Executive Director as a “good leaver”. If the 
Executive Director is a “good leaver”, their award will vest on the normal vesting date and will not be subject to pro-rating.
Awards normally vest early on a change of control of the Company.
•	 Treatment of long-term incentive plan awards
The treatment of awards under the LTIP (both PSA and RSA) is governed by the rules of the plan which have been approved by 
shareholders and are described below. Awards will normally lapse if an Executive Director’s employment terminates, unless the 
Executive Director leaves for specified “good leaver” reasons. The “good leaver” reasons are the same as described above. If the 
Executive Director is a “good leaver”, awards will vest to the extent that the attached performance conditions are met, but on a 
time pro-rated basis, with Committee discretion to allow early vesting. Under the LTIP, awards vest on the normal vesting date 
subject to performance over the normal performance period, unless the Committee decides otherwise. Awards normally vest 
early on a change of control of the Company, subject to performance conditions and time pro-rating.
A summary of the key terms of the Executive Directors’ service contracts on termination of employment or change of control is set 
out below.
Name
Position
Notice period  
from employer
Notice period 
from employee
Compensation payable on termination 
of employment or change of control
Mr A Wood
Service contract dated 
13 November 2017
Chief Executive 
Officer
12 months
6 months
As set out in the Remuneration Policy.
No change of control provisions
Mrs L S Burdett 
Service contract dated  
17 September 2018
Chief Financial 
Officer
12 months
6 months
As set out in the Remuneration Policy.
No change of control provisions
Remuneration policy for other employees and engagement
The Committee has ensured “workforce remuneration and related policies and the alignment of incentives and rewards with 
culture” has been considered when making decisions regarding Executive Director remuneration in 2021.
In setting the Remuneration Policy, the Committee reviewed:
•	 Our Global Compensation Policy – it noted alignment between pay for performance provisions for Executive Directors and the 
wider workforce, along with an alignment of historic average pay increases.
•	 Our incentive plans (STIP and LTIP) – it noted alignment between the plans for the top 200 senior managers and the Executive 
Directors and that work is underway to align other short-term incentive plans lower down the organisation.
•	 Alignment of reward with culture, values and long-term success – it noted the successful implementation of our High 
Performance Culture programme (which is linked to our culture strategic priority) which is embedded in performance and 
talent processes across the Group. The success of our High Performance Culture programme is enhanced by the increase in 
employee engagement.
A report will be provided each year to the Committee, ensuring it is updated on remuneration of the wider workforce and ensuring 
context as it makes remuneration decisions related to the Executive Directors. 
The Remuneration Committee primarily consults management to understand employee views on executive remuneration. The Board 
also regularly invites Meggitt’s Non-Executive Director responsible for employee engagement, Nancy Gioia – who is a member of the 
Committee – to report on feedback received through the Board’s very extensive engagement programme with the workforce (as outlined 
elsewhere in this Annual Report). Therefore there is an effective two-way mechanism in place for employees’ views and feedback. As a 
Board generally, we keep our approach to employee engagement (as set out on pages 90 and 92) under review and look forward to 
evolving our approach further over time. 
The Remuneration Policy for other employees is based on broadly consistent principles as that for Executive Directors. 
Annual salary reviews take into account personal performance, Group performance, local pay and market conditions, and salary 
levels for similar roles in comparable companies. Some employees below executive level are eligible to participate in annual bonus 
schemes; opportunities and performance measures vary by organisational level, geographical region and an individual’s role. 
Senior executives are eligible for LTIP (PSA and RSA) on similar terms to the Executive Directors (except some of the performance 
conditions may vary), although award opportunities are lower and vary by organisational level. All UK employees are eligible to 
participate in the Sharesave Scheme and SIP on identical terms.
Directors’ remuneration report
continued
Directors’ Report
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
154

Pay ratios and pay gaps
Conscious of the increasing focus on the context of the wider stakeholder experience, the Committee also kept front of mind 
other remuneration metrics such as the CEO Pay Ratio and Gender Pay Gap. The Gender Pay Gap reduced from 9.3% to 5.7% in 
2021. Our progress was driven by several senior executive changes and our increased focus on diversity and inclusion. The CEO 
Pay Ratio increased from 20x to 38x, due to a increased incentive outcome for the CEO relative to the more fixed remuneration 
packages for the UK workforce, a large proportion of whom are production workers.
Non-Executive Directors – Remuneration Policy table
Non-Executive Directors stand for re-election annually, do not have a contract of service and are not eligible to join the Group’s 
pension or share schemes.
Fees
Function
To attract and retain Non-Executive Directors of the highest calibre with broad 
commercial and other experience relevant to the Group.
Operation
Fee levels are reviewed annually, with any adjustments effective 1 April each year. 
The fees paid to the Chairman of the Board are determined by the Committee, while 
the fees for all other Non-Executive Directors are reviewed by a committee of the Board 
formed of the Executive Directors. Fees for the year under review and for the current year 
are disclosed in the annual report on remuneration.
Additional fees are paid to the Chair of the Remuneration Committee; Chair of the 
Audit Committee; Chair of the Corporate Responsibility Committee and Non-Executive 
Director responsible for employee engagement; and to the Senior Independent Director, 
to reflect the additional time commitment of these roles. Additional fees may also be paid 
to Non-Executive Directors to cover the cost of attendance at meetings which take place 
outside their continent of residence. In addition, Non-Executive Directors are reimbursed 
for reasonable business-related expenses. The Group may pay any tax due on these 
expenses on behalf of Non-Executive Directors.
In deciding fee increases, the Committee considers external market benchmarks as well 
as salary increases across the Group and prevailing market conditions. Currently, all fees 
are paid in GBP, however the Committee reserves the right to pay future and existing 
Non-Executive Directors in any other currency (converted at the prevailing market rate 
when a change is agreed).
Opportunity 
Fee increases will be applied taking into account the outcome of the annual review. 
The maximum aggregate annual fee for all Non-Executive Directors (including the 
Chairman) as provided in the Company’s Articles of Association is £1,000,000.
Performance metrics
None.
Non-Executive Director expenses
Non-Executive Directors are already reimbursed for reasonable business-related expenses. The Group may decide to pay any tax 
that is due on such expenses on behalf of the Non-Executive Director.
Non-Executive Director recruitment
In recruiting a new Non-Executive Director, the Committee will use the Remuneration Policy as set out in the table above.
By order of the Board
Alison Goligher
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
2 March 2022
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
155
Directors’ Report

Other statutory information
Directors’ Report
The Directors present their report with the Group’s audited consolidated financial statements (prepared in accordance with UK-
adopted international accounting standards and the Companies Act 2006) and the Company’s audited financial statements (prepared 
in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101, “Reduced Disclosure Framework” (FRS 101) and the Companies Act 2006) for 
the year ended 31 December 2021.
Incorporation by reference
Certain laws and regulations require that specific information should be included in the Directors’ report. The table below shows the 
items which are incorporated into our Directors’ report by reference:
Information incorporated into the Directors’ report by reference
Location and page
Important events and likely future developments in the Group’s 
business
Strategic report (pages 08 to 94)
Post balance sheet events
N/A
Employee information 
Employee engagement
Employment of disabled persons
Corporate responsibility report (pages 74 to 77)
Stakeholder engagement pages (90 and 92)
Corporate responsibility report (page 76)
Engagement with stakeholders
Stakeholder engagement (pages 90 to 92)
Greenhouse gas emissions
Corporate responsibility report (page 82)
Research and development
Note 7 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements (page 
196) and Chief Financial Officer’s review (page 44)
Policies on financial risk management, including the extent to 
which financial instruments are utilised to mitigate any significant 
risks to which the Group is exposed
Note 3 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements (pages 
188 and 189)
Statement of the amount of interest capitalised by the Group 
during the year with an indication of the amount and treatment 
of any related tax relief
Note 18 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements (page 
204)
Overseas branches
Note 45 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements (pages 
230 and 231)
Dividends
The Board recognises the importance of the dividend to the Company’s shareholders, but due to the financial impact of the 
COVID-19 pandemic on the Group, the Board took the prudent decision not to recommend a final dividend per ordinary 5 pence 
share for 2020 in order to retain cash within the Group, manage net debt levels and preserve flexibility. The Board also took the 
decision not to pay an interim dividend in 2021 due to ongoing market conditions. Therefore no dividend was paid in 2021 (2020: nil). 
In line with the terms of the previously announced proposed acquisition with Parker-Hannifin, the Group is not paying a final dividend 
for 2021. 
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
We operate a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) which enables shareholders to buy the Company’s shares on the London Stock 
Exchange with their cash dividend. Further information about the DRIP is available from Computershare, our Registrar. During 2021, 
no dividends were paid. 
Directors
The Directors of the Company in office during the year and up to the date of signing the financial statements were:
Sir Nigel Rudd (Chairman), Mr A Wood, Mr G S Berruyer, Mrs L S Burdett, Mr C R Day, Mrs N L Gioia, Ms A J P Goligher, Mr G C 
Hachey and Mrs C L Silver.
All Directors listed above will be submitted for re‑election at the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
Details of any unexpired terms of the Directors’ service contracts are in the Directors’ remuneration report. Membership of 
Committees and biographical information is disclosed on pages 100 to 103 and in the AGM notice. Succession activities are 
highlighted in the Nominations Committee report on pages 122 to 124.
The Directors benefit from qualifying third‑party indemnity provisions for the purposes of Section 236 of the Companies Act 
2006 pursuant to the Articles in effect throughout the financial year and up to the date of this Directors’ report. The Company 
also purchased and maintained throughout the year Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance. No indemnity is provided for the 
Company’s auditors.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
156

Conflicts of interest
We have a procedure for the disclosure, review, authorisation and management of Directors’ conflicts of interest and potential 
conflicts of interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. In deciding whether to authorise a conflict or 
potential conflict, the Directors must have regard to their general duties under the Companies Act 2006. 
The authorisation of any conflict matter and the terms of authorisation are regularly reviewed by the Board. Further details can be 
found on page 110.
Political donations
Neither the Group nor the Company made any political donations or incurred any political expenditure during the year (2020: None).
Share capital and control
As at 31 December 2021, the Company held 9,859 treasury shares with a nominal value of 5 pence each and the Company’s issued 
share capital (excluding shares held in treasury) consisted of 782,005,314 shares with a nominal value of 5 pence each. As at 1 
March 2022, the Company held 9,859 treasury shares with a nominal value of 5 pence each and the Company’s issued share capital 
(excluding shares held in treasury) consisted of 782,021,555 shares with a nominal value of 5 pence each. The issued share capital 
of the Company at 31 December 2021 and details of shares issued during the financial year are shown in Note 37 to the Group’s 
consolidated financial statements.
The ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The rights and obligations attaching to the Company’s ordinary shares 
are set out in the Articles. A copy of the Articles is available for inspection at our registered office. The holders of ordinary shares are 
entitled to receive a copy of our Annual Report and Accounts, to attend and speak at our General Meetings, to appoint proxies to 
exercise full voting rights and to participate in any distribution of income or capital.
There are no restrictions on transfer, or limitations on holding ordinary shares, and no requirements for prior approval of any transfers. 
There are no known arrangements under which financial rights are held by persons other than holders of the shares and no known 
agreements or restrictions on share transfers or on voting rights. Shares acquired through Company share plans rank pari passu (on 
an equal footing) with the shares in issue and have no special rights.
We operate an Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (the “Trust”) that was formed to acquire shares to satisfy the vesting and 
exercise of awards under the Group’s share-based incentive arrangements. The trustees do not exercise any voting rights on shares 
held by the Trust and a dividend waiver operates in respect of these shares. Once shares are transferred from the Trust to participants 
the participants are entitled to receive dividends and exercise voting rights attached to the shares.
Rules about the appointment and replacement of Directors are contained in the Articles which provide that a Director may be 
appointed by ordinary resolution of the shareholders or by the existing Directors, either to fill a vacancy or as an additional Director. 
Changes to the Articles must be submitted to the shareholders for approval by way of special resolution. The Directors may exercise 
all the powers of the Company subject to the provisions of relevant legislation, the Articles and any directions given by the Company 
in a General Meeting.
At the 2021 AGM, the Company was granted authority by shareholders to purchase up to 78,127,336 ordinary shares, being 10% of 
the Company’s issued share capital, in accordance with the Articles. No shares were bought back under this authority during the year 
ended 31 December 2021. Shares purchased under this authority would have been cancelled or held as treasury shares to be sold at 
a later date or used to satisfy awards under the Company’s share plans as the Board saw fit.
The Directors were also granted authority by shareholders to allot securities in the Company up to a maximum nominal amount of 
£26,042,444, of this amount £13,021,222 can only be allotted pursuant to a rights issue. The Directors were also authorised to allot 
securities, without the application of pre‑emption rights, up to a nominal amount of £1,953,183 and a further £1,953,183 in connection 
with an acquisition or other capital investment of a kind contemplated by the Statement of Principles on Disapplying Pre‑Emption 
Rights. No such transaction is contemplated at present.
These authorities apply until the conclusion of the 2022 AGM or, if earlier, 30 June 2022. The Company will seek shareholder approval 
to renew these authorities at the 2022 AGM. Detailed explanatory notes are set out in the AGM notice.
The Group has significant financing agreements which include change of control provisions which, should there be a change of ownership 
of the Company, could result in renegotiation, withdrawal or early repayment of these financing agreements. These are a USD125m note 
purchase agreement dated June 2010, a USD600m note purchase agreement dated May 2016, two term loan facility agreements in the 
amounts of GBP30m and USD50m dated December 2019, a GBP50m term loan agreement dated June 2020, a USD300m note purchase 
agreement dated November 2020 and a USD410m syndicated revolving credit agreement dated November 2021.
There are a number of other long‑term commercial agreements that may alter or terminate upon a change of control of the Company 
following a successful takeover bid. These arrangements are commercially sensitive and their disclosure could be seriously prejudicial 
to the Company.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
157
Directors’ Report

Other statutory information
continued
Directors’ Report
Agreements with the Company’s Directors or employees providing compensation in the event of a takeover bid:
Director
Contractual entitlement
Mr A Wood
None except that provisions in the Company’s share plans may cause options and/or awards granted 
to employees under such plans to vest on a takeover.
Mrs L S Burdett
None except that provisions in the Company’s share plans may cause options and/or awards granted 
to employees under such plans to vest on a takeover.
Non-Executive Directors
None.
All other employees
There are no agreements that would provide compensation for loss of employment resulting from 
a takeover except that provisions in the Company’s share plans may cause options and/or awards 
granted to employees under such plans to vest on a takeover.
Substantial shareholdings 
At 31 December 2021, the Company had been notified under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) of the following 
substantial interests in the issued ordinary shares of the Company requiring disclosure:
Direct
voting rights*
Indirect
voting rights*
Other financial 
instruments with
voting rights*
Total
voting rights*
Percentage 
of total
voting rights**
BlackRock Inc.
–
33,087,041
60,961,162
94,048,203
12.02
JPMorgan Securities plc
–
2,157,686
68,237,708
70,395,394
9.00
Societe Generale
50,995,659
–
95,500
51,091,159
6.53
Morgan Stanley
–
47,052,874
183,169
47,236,043
6.04
FMR LLC (FIL Limited)
–
38,024,107
1,430,060
39,454,167
5.05
The Capital Group Companies, Inc
–
38,606,468
–
38,606,468
4.94
Harris Associates L.P.
–
38,323,051
–
38,323,051
4.94
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc
–
37,789,977
–
37,789,977
4.84
Standard Life Investments Ltd
22,153,694
3,769,560
–
25,923,254
3.96
Legal & General Group plc
23,704,643
–
–
23,704,643
3.01
*	 One voting right per ordinary share.
**	 Percentage of the Company’s issued share capital when the Company was notified of the change in holding.
In the period from 31 December 2021 to 1 March 2022 we received numerous notifications in accordance with DTR5 from Societe 
Generale, Morgan Stanley, Barclays Bank plc, JP Morgan Securities plc and UBS AG London Branch. Details of all notifications were 
published on a regulatory information service and are available on our website. The substantial interests notified to us as at 1 March 
2022 are set out below:
Direct
voting rights*
Indirect
voting rights*
Other financial 
instruments with
voting rights*
Total
voting rights*
Percentage 
of total
voting rights**
BlackRock Inc.
–
33,087,041
60,961,162
94,048,203
12.02
JPMorgan Securities plc
–
2,764,678
68,955,589
71,720,267
9.17
Societe Generale
56,518,850
–
95,500
56,614,350
7.24
Barclays Bank plc
5,217,610
–
54,006,090
59,223,700
7.57
Morgan Stanley
–
43,625,560
18,950,751
62,576,311
8.00
FMR LLC (FIL Limited)
–
38,024,107
1,430,060
39,454,167
5.05
The Capital Group Companies, Inc
–
38,606,468
–
38,606,468
4.94
Harris Associates L.P.
–
38,323,051
–
38,323,051
4.94
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc
–
37,789,977
–
37,789,977
4.84
Standard Life Investments Ltd
22,153,694
3,769,560
–
25,923,254
3.96
Legal & General Group plc
23,704,643
–
–
23,704,643
3.01
*	 One voting right per ordinary share.
**	 Percentage of the Company’s issued share capital when the Company was notified of the change in holding.
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law 
and regulation.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
158

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have 
prepared the Group financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and the Company 
financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting 
Standards, comprising FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and applicable law).
Under company law, Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view 
of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the financial 
statements, the Directors are required to:
•	 Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently.
•	 	State whether applicable UK- adopted international accounting standards have been followed for the Group financial statements 
and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 have been followed for the Company financial statements, 
subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements.
•	 Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent.
•	 Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and Company will 
continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group’s and 
Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and Company and 
enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Directors’ remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Directors’ confirmations
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 100 to 103, confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
•	 The Group financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards, give a true 
and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group.
•	 The Company financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Accounting Standards, 
comprising FRS 101, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Company. 
•	 The Strategic Report and this Directors’ report include a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the 
position of the Group and Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
In the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors’ report is approved:
•	 So far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group’s and Company’s auditors are unaware.
•	 They have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit 
information and to establish that the Group’s and Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
Fair, balanced and understandable
The Board of Directors as at the date of this report consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced 
and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s and Company’s position, 
performance, business model and strategy. The Board has made this assessment on the basis of a review of the accounts process, a 
discussion on the content of the Annual Report assessing its fairness, balance and understandability, together with the confirmation 
from executive management that the Annual Report is fair, balanced and understandable.
Going concern
The Directors have formed a judgement, at the time of approving the financial statements, that there is a reasonable expectation that the 
Group and the Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for a period of at least 12 months from the date of this 
report. For this reason, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Group and Company financial statements. 
Details on how the Directors reached this judgement are set out in Note 1 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on pages 176 
to 177.
This Directors’ report, comprising pages 96 to 159, has been approved by the Board and is signed on its behalf by
M L Thomas 
Company Secretary 
2 March 2022
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
159
Directors’ Report

Report on the audit of the financial statements
Opinion
In our opinion:
•	 Meggitt PLC’s Group financial statements and Company financial statements (the financial statements) give a true and fair view of 
the state of the Group’s and of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2021 and of the Group’s profit and the Group’s cash flows 
for the year then ended;
•	 the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards;
•	 the Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting 
Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and applicable law); and
•	 the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts 2021 (the Annual Report), which comprise: the 
Consolidated and Company balance sheets as at 31 December 2021; the Consolidated income statement, the Consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income, the Consolidated cash flow statement, and the Consolidated and Company statements of changes in equity for 
the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the significant accounting policies.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. 
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial 
statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have 
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided.
Other than those disclosed in note 6 to the Group financial statements, we have provided no non-audit services to the Company 
or its controlled undertakings in the period under audit.
Our audit approach
Overview
Audit scope
•	 We identified 12 reporting units which, in our view, required a full scope audit based on their size or risk. In addition, we 
determined that specified audit procedures were required at a further two reporting units to address specific risk characteristics 
and provide sufficient overall Group coverage of particular revenue streams. We used component teams in five countries to 
perform a combination of full scope audits and specified procedures at 14 reporting units.
•	 The Group team performed procedures over several different financial statement line items, including complex areas prepared 
by the head office finance function, to provide sufficient overall Group coverage. The consolidation and financial statement 
disclosures were audited by the Group team.
•	 Reporting units where we performed audit procedures accounted for 62% of Group profit before tax; 63% of Group underlying 
profit before tax; and 79% of Group total assets. Our audit scope provided sufficient appropriate audit evidence as a basis for our 
opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. We considered the Group’s climate change risk assessment process and 
this, together with involvement of our own climate change experts, provided us with an understanding of the potential impact of 
climate change on the financial statements. See the ‘How we tailored the audit scope’ section below for further details.
Key audit matters
•	 Going concern (Group and Company)
•	 Goodwill impairment assessment (Group)
•	 Development costs impairment assessments (Group)
•	 Environmental provisions (Group)
•	 Retirement benefit obligation liabilities and complex pension scheme assets (Group and Company)
Materiality
•	 Overall Group materiality: £13.2m (2020: £15.2m) based on a five-year average of 5% of underlying profit before tax.
•	 Overall Company materiality: £35.0m (2020: £35.0m) based on 1% of total assets.
•	 Performance materiality: £9.9m (2020: £11.4m) (Group) and £26.25m (2020: £26.25m) (Company).
Financial Statements
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
160

The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the 
financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not 
due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation 
of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on 
the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in 
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
COVID-19, provisions for uncertain tax positions and Company’s investments in subsidiary undertakings impairment assessment, 
which were key audit matters last year, are no longer included because of the relative level of assessed audit risk associated with 
these matters having reduced in the current year. Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.
Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Going concern (Group and Company)
The Directors have formed a judgement, at the time 
of approving the consolidated and Company financial 
statements, that there is a reasonable expectation that the 
Group and Company (hereinafter, the ‘Group’) have adequate 
resources to continue in operational existence for a period of 
at least 12 months from the date of approval. For this reason, 
the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in 
preparing these financial statements. 
In making an assessment as to whether the going concern 
principle should be adopted, the Directors have considered 
the period to 31 March 2023 (the ‘assessment period’). 
The Directors have concluded that there are no material 
uncertainties around the Group’s ability to continue as a 
going concern. 
In forming this assessment the Directors considered 
its liquidity requirements and compliance with its loan 
covenants based upon its plans, as approved by the Board 
in December 2021 and updated through to the date of 
approval of these financial statements. Further the Directors 
modelled a reverse stress test scenario under which the 
Group would be close to breaching its net debt:EBITDA 
covenant ratio and concluded that, the likelihood of such a 
scenario occurring to be remote and significantly outside 
any severe but plausible scenarios modelled.
The Directors also considered the proposed acquisition 
of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation (Parker). 
The Directors concluded that Parker has the intention and 
ability to: finance the equity purchase, repay liabilities 
falling due on a change of control and continue to 
operate the Group as a going concern throughout the 
assessment period.
In light of the uncertainty that remains as to the precise 
timing and speed of the recovery and the challenging 
market conditions, particularly in civil aerospace, and the 
proposed acquisition by Parker, our audit devoted a significant 
amount of resources to evaluating the Directors’ going 
concern assessment. 
Refer also to note 1 of the consolidated financial statements 
(pages 176 to 177).
For our audit response and conclusions in respect of going 
concern, see the ‘Conclusions relating to going concern’ 
section below.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
161
Financial Statements

Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC continued
Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Goodwill impairment assessment (Group)
The Group holds significant amounts of goodwill (£1,531.8m) 
on the balance sheet.
Management has performed their annual impairment 
review as at 30 June 2021. No triggering events have 
been identified during 2021 and therefore no additional 
impairment reviews have been performed. No impairment 
charge has been recorded against goodwill in the 
current year.
The proposed acquisition by Parker provides a reliable 
estimate of fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCOD) and 
this has been used to determine the recoverable amount for 
the impairment review. 
The recoverable amount has been allocated to each cash-
generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs using the relative 
value-in-use of each CGU.
The value-in-use model includes the following estimates:
•	 The forecast cash flows in the five-year plan;
•	 The probability weighting factors applied to each of the 
potential scenarios used to derive an expected value for 
the cash flow projections; 
•	 The growth rates applied to extrapolate forecasts beyond 
the plan; and
•	 The discount rates applied to future cash flows.
Our audit focused on the risk that the carrying value of 
goodwill could be overstated.
Refer also to note 17 of the consolidated financial 
statements (pages 202 to 203).
We have performed the following procedures over the 
FVLCOD used to determine the recoverable amount for the 
impairment review: 
•	 Recalculated FVLCOD using information from the Scheme 
Document, including the offer price per ordinary share and 
the estimated costs of disposal;
•	 Tested the mathematical accuracy of management’s 
allocation of FVLCOD to each CGU or group of CGUs; and
•	 Compared management’s allocation of FVLCOD based on 
value-in-use with alternative allocations based on revenue 
and underlying profitability. 
We did not identify any indication of management bias or any 
material exceptions in these tests, with significant headroom 
across all CGUs or groups of CGUs.
We have performed the following procedures over the value-
in-use model used to by management to allocate the FVLCOD 
to each CGU or group of CGUs:
•	 Evaluated management’s future cash flow forecasts by 
obtaining the scenarios modelled by management and:
–	 Tested the mathematical accuracy and integrity of 
the models;
–	 Agreed the forecasts used to the five-year plan presented 
to the Board;
–	 Identified the key assumptions applied, which we 
determined to be revenue growth and margins. 
We compared these assumptions against historical 
actuals and management’s prior year value-in-use model; 
and 
–	 Assessed the appropriateness of the alternative scenarios 
and whether the weighting applied to each scenario 
was reasonable.
  We did not identify any material exceptions in these tests.
•	 Compared the long-term growth rate used for each territory 
to long term inflation projections for the countries in which 
the CGUs operate. We did not identify any differences; and
•	 Tested the discount rates used in management’s impairment 
assessment by comparing key inputs, where relevant, 
to externally derived data or data for comparable listed 
organisations. Our specialists reviewed the discount rates and 
management’s estimates were within our expected range, 
with one exception, which does not materially impact the 
level of headroom.
We have not identified any impairment triggers which would 
require an updated impairment assessment in the intervening 
period to year end.
We have assessed the related disclosures in the consolidated 
financial statements and consider them to be appropriate.
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
162

Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Development costs impairment assessments (Group)
The Group holds a significant amount of development 
costs (£524.7m) on the balance sheet. These assets are 
subject to impairment testing at the individual asset 
(programme) level, at least annually. Where headroom is 
limited, when comparing its value-in-use to its carrying 
value, or if events or changes in circumstances indicate the 
carrying value may not be recoverable, an impairment test 
is performed more frequently. 
An impairment charge of £3.7m has been recorded against 
development costs in the current year. 
This matter involves a high degree of estimation and 
judgement which necessitated us devoting significant 
time to this area. Our audit focused on the accuracy of the 
impairment charge recorded, whilst also considering the 
risk that the carrying value of development costs could be 
overstated post the impairment being recorded. 
We focused our audit procedures on those programmes 
against which management holds an impairment provision, 
those with limited headroom and those with a significant 
carrying value. The key estimates and assumptions 
assessed were:
•	 The estimated aircraft or engine volumes (fleet forecasts) 
and the period over which future cash flows are forecast 
(fleet lives);
•	 The sales price per part where a purchase price has not yet 
been agreed;
•	 The cost per part where the programme is still in 
development; and
•	 The discount rate applied to future cash flows. 
The impact of climate change is specifically related to the 
time that a platform (e.g. aircraft or aero engine on which 
the Group has content) will remain in service and thus 
generate revenue either through sales to the aircraft or 
engine OEM or to the Operators and MRO companies in 
the aftermarket. We considered the impact climate change 
is anticipated to have on future cash flows and assessed 
the appropriateness of how management had considered 
these in programme impairment assessments. We also 
considered management’s assessment of programme 
useful economic lives in the context of risks posed by 
climate change.
Refer also to note 4 and 18 of the consolidated financial 
statements (pages 190 to 191 and page 204).
We have performed the following procedures over the 
value-in-use models which support management’s 
impairment assessment: 
•	 Tested the mathematical integrity of the model;
•	 Tested the discount rates used in management’s impairment 
assessment by comparing key inputs, where relevant, 
to externally derived data or data for comparable listed 
organisations. Our specialists reviewed the discount rates and 
management’s estimates were within our expected range, with 
two exceptions, which do not materially impact the level of 
headroom; and
•	 Agreed fleet forecast data used in calculating the programme 
forecast cash flow up to 2035 to external market forecasts 
for all heightened risk programmes (defined below) and on 
a sample basis over the remaining programme population. 
We corroborated any significant deviations applied by 
management to supporting evidence. We assessed fleet 
forecasts used beyond the period covered by the external 
market forecasts, considering average aircraft lives and 
trend analysis and considered them to be supported by the 
evidence we obtained. 
We identified those programmes which we considered to be 
of heightened risk based on their value or potential for the 
carrying amount not being recovered. For these models we 
performed the following additional audit procedures:
•	 Agreed the sales price per part to customer contract or 
alternative supporting evidence;
•	 Agreed cost per part to inventory historic cost per unit, 
including bill of materials, or alternative supporting evidence; 
and
•	 Performed a sensitivity analysis over the discount rates and 
fleet forecasts. 
We did not identify any material exceptions in these tests. 
We compared management’s assumptions to external industry 
benchmarks and reports, including forecasts for OE fleet sizes 
(fleet forecast data, see above) and civil aerospace passenger 
traffic forecasts measured using RPKs. We also considered the 
estimated weighted average remaining useful economic life 
of the development costs and the average period over which 
the carrying value will be recovered. The audit evidence that 
we obtained supports management’s judgement that the fleet 
lives of the aircraft to which the development costs relate are 
not expected to reduce significantly. On this basis we have not 
identified an additional impairment as a result of the impact 
of climate change and consider the amortisation charge to be 
materially accurate.
Based on the procedures described above, we consider the 
impairment charge recognised to be materially accurate. 
We evaluated and concluded that the assets, including 
significant estimates and judgements, were appropriately 
disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
163
Financial Statements

Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Environmental provisions (Group)
The Group has liabilities of £93.6m relating to 
environmental matters.
The environmental matters primarily relate to known 
exposures arising from environmental investigation and 
remediation of certain sites in the US for which the Group 
has been identified as a potentially responsible party 
under US law. The liabilities are based on subjective 
estimates of the level and timing of remediation costs, 
including the period of operating and monitoring 
activities required. Our audit procedures focused on the 
risk that the provisions in relation to these matters could 
be understated.
The Group has separately recognised insurance and 
other receivables of £15.0m. We focused on the required 
asset recognition criteria being met and recoverability of 
these receivables.
Refer also to note 4 and 34 of the consolidated financial 
statements (pages 190 to 191 and page 218).
Our work on the valuation of environmental liabilities 
comprised the following:
•	 Confirmed that the Group’s external environmental 
consultants and legal advisors have sufficient expertise, 
are qualified and affiliated with the appropriate industry 
bodies in the respective local territory, and are independent 
of the Group. In addition, we have held discussions with 
management’s external experts for the most significant sites 
to further understand the cost estimates provided;
•	 Obtained the cost estimates and reports prepared by the 
Group’s external environmental consultants and legal advisors 
for the most significant sites. We assessed the consistency of 
the cost estimates year on year and the level of costs incurred 
compared to the prior year estimates to assess the historical 
accuracy of the estimates and understand significant changes 
to the scope of remediation plans. We confirmed that these 
changes have been appropriately reflected in the provision;
•	 Reconciled the cost estimates and reports to the provision 
recorded and gained an understanding of all significant 
adjustments applied, such as differences in the period over 
which operating and monitoring activities are conducted and 
the application of additional provisions for incremental costs. 
We assessed the reasonableness of these, including reviewing 
historical data where appropriate and consider the provision 
to be supported by reasonable assumptions; 
•	 In respect of the matter set out in the ‘Environmental 
provisions and associated recoveries from insurers and 
other third parties’ section of note 4 of the consolidated 
financial statements, we obtained a letter from the Group’s 
external legal advisors and a copy of the jury verdict form. 
The evidence obtained supported the amounts recorded in 
the financial statements in respect of this matter; and
•	 We obtained evidence of the settlements and claims which 
resulted in the recognition of receivables and found that the 
evidence obtained supported asset recognition. 
We evaluated and concluded that the liabilities, related 
assets and potential exposures, including significant 
estimates, were appropriately disclosed in the consolidated 
financial statements.
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
164

Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Retirement benefit obligation liabilities and complex 
pension scheme assets (Group and Company)
The Group has retirement benefit obligations with gross 
liabilities of £1,355.1m, of which £899.3m is recognised by 
the Company. The liabilities are significant in the context of 
the overall Group and Company balance sheets.
The valuation of retirement benefit obligations requires 
significant levels of estimation and technical expertise, 
including the use of actuarial experts to support 
management in selecting appropriate assumptions. 
Small changes in a number of the key financial and 
demographic assumptions used to value the Group’s 
and the Company’s retirement benefit obligation could 
have a material impact on the calculation of the liability. 
These include:
•	 Discount rates;
•	 Inflation rates; and
•	 Mortality.
Of the £1,228.0m of pension plan assets (of which £839.9m 
is recognised by the Company), there is a significant 
amount of complex pooled investment vehicles (PIVs). 
This is as a result of complex issues such as an element 
of the underlying investments being classified as level 
2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy, transfer restrictions, 
infrequent pricing and/or investments in less regulated 
markets. As the nature of these assets is more complex; the 
valuation of these PIVs could have a material impact on the 
valuation of the pension assets.
Our audit procedures focused on the risk that the 
retirement benefit obligations could be understated.
Refer also to note 36 of the consolidated financial 
statements (pages 221 to 226) and note 12 of the Company 
financial statements (pages 241 to 242).
We evaluated the assumptions made in relation to the 
valuation of the liabilities, with input from our actuarial experts. 
In particular we:
•	 Confirmed that the Group’s external experts are qualified 
and affiliated with the appropriate industry bodies in the 
respective local territory and are independent of the Group. 
In addition, we have held discussions with management’s 
external expert for the UK, US and Swiss pension schemes to 
further understand the key assumptions;
•	 Tested the completeness and accuracy of participant 
employee data used by the actuary in the liability calculation 
to underlying records;
•	 Tested the discount and inflation rate assumptions used by 
comparing them to our internally developed benchmarks, 
which are based on externally derived data, and to 
comparable organisations. We observed the assumptions to 
be within our expected range;
•	 Compared assumed mortality rates to national and 
industry averages. From the evidence obtained we found 
the assumptions to be within our expected range and 
methodology used to be appropriate; and
•	 Considered the appropriateness of the methodology used 
to update estimates from the latest actuarial valuation and 
assessed changes in assumptions in aggregate from the 
prior year to assess the consistency of approach overall. 
From the evidence obtained we found the assumptions and 
methodology used to be appropriate.
Our work on the valuation of complex pension assets 
comprised the following:
•	 Obtained an understanding of the nature of the 
complex assets;
•	 Obtained third party confirmations and Service Organisation 
Control (SOC) reports from investment and fiduciary managers 
and found that the evidence obtained supported the valuation 
of the complex assets; and
•	 Considered the extent to which there was any evidence 
available which might contradict the valuation. No such 
contradictory evidence was identified.
We evaluated and concluded that the pension assets 
and liabilities, including significant estimates, were 
appropriately disclosed in the consolidated and Company 
financial statements.
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial 
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the Company, the accounting processes and controls, 
and the industry in which they operate.
The Group’s accounting process is structured around a local finance function in each of the Group’s reporting units. 
These functions maintain their own accounting records and controls (although transactional processing and certain controls for 
some reporting units are performed at the Group’s shared service centres) and report to the head office finance team through an 
integrated consolidation system.
In establishing the overall Group audit strategy and plan, we determined the type of work that needed to be performed at the 
reporting units by the Group engagement team and by component auditors from other PwC network firms. Where the work 
was performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement we needed to have in the audit work at those 
reporting units to be able to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion 
on the Group financial statements as a whole.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
165
Financial Statements

For each reporting unit we determined whether we required an audit of their complete financial information (full scope) or 
whether specified audit procedures addressing a specific risk characteristic or financial statement line item would be sufficient. 
Those where a full scope audit was required included six reporting units considered to be individually financially significant 
(Airframe Systems based in Akron (US), Fareham (UK) and Coventry (UK), Defense Systems based in Irvine (US), Airframe Systems 
and Services & Support based in Ventura County (US) and Airframe Systems, Engine Systems, Energy & Equipment and Services 
& Support based in Fribourg (Switzerland)). We performed a full scope audit at a further six reporting units selected by their 
size or risk and reviewed certain working papers for those contributing material amounts to Group underlying profit before 
tax. We determined that specified audit procedures were required at a further two reporting units to address specific risk 
characteristics or to provide sufficient overall Group coverage of particular revenue streams.
In addition to the work performed at the in-scope reporting units, there is a substantial amount of work performed at head 
office by the Group audit engagement team. The Group team performs audit procedures over the Company’s financial position 
and results and several financial statement line items, including complex areas prepared by the head office finance function, to 
provide sufficient overall Group coverage. These include goodwill, development costs, other intangible assets, investments, 
derivative financial instruments and related hedge accounting, cash and cash equivalents, bank and other borrowings and 
related finance costs, certain right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, environmental and other provisions and related receivables, 
retirement benefit obligations, certain current tax charges, deferred tax, share-based payments and amounts arising on the 
acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses. The Group team also performs procedures over the consolidation and financial 
statement disclosures.
These audit procedures covered 62% of Group profit before tax; 63% of Group underlying profit before tax; and 79% of Group 
total assets (key coverage metrics). As a result of its structure and size, the Group also has a large number of small reporting units 
that, in aggregate, make up a material portion of the key coverage metrics. The Group engagement team perform analytical 
review procedures over a significant proportion of these with the remaining population of reporting units contributing insignificant 
underlying profit before tax individually and in aggregate. These procedures include an analysis of year-on-year movements, at a 
level of disaggregation to enable a focus on higher risk balances and unusual movements. This gave us the evidence we needed 
for our opinion on the financial statements as a whole.
We considered the Group’s climate change risk assessment and this, together with involvement of our own climate change 
experts, provided us with an understanding of the potential impact of climate change on the financial statements. We assessed 
that the key financial statement line items and estimates which are more likely to be materially impacted by climate risks are those 
associated with future cash flows, given the more notable impacts of climate change on the business are expected to arise in 
the medium to long term. These include the impairment assessments of the Group’s goodwill and development costs, including 
the specific consideration of the impact of climate change on likely aircraft lives, and the related impact on annual amortisation 
charges, and the Company’s investments in subsidiaries. For the impairment assessments of the Group’s goodwill and the 
Company’s investments in subsidiaries, the proposed acquisition by Parker provided a reliable estimate of fair value less costs 
of disposal (FVLCOD), and this has been used to determine the recoverable amount for the impairment review. This is a market 
based measure and factors in the buyer’s assessment of climate change. Therefore our audit response for these areas did not 
require additional climate change considerations. Our ‘development costs impairment assessments’ key audit matter further 
explains how we evaluated the impact of climate change on the other risks identified. 
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. 
These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and 
extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of 
misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
Financial statements – Group
Financial statements – Company
Overall materiality
£13.2m (2020: £15.2m)
£35.0m (2020: £35.0m)
How we determined it
A five-year average of 5% of underlying profit before tax
1% of total assets
Rationale for 
benchmark applied
Based on the benchmarks used in the Annual Report, 
underlying profit before tax is the primary measure used 
by the shareholders in assessing the performance of the 
Group. Further, we consider it appropriate to eliminate 
volatility and to preserve the link between materiality and 
the performance of the underlying business. As such, we 
have used a five-year average benchmark, consistent with 
the benchmark applied in 2020.
We believe that total assets is 
the primary measure used by the 
shareholders in assessing the 
performance and position of the entity 
and reflects the Company’s principal 
activity as a holding company.
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
166

For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. 
The range of materiality allocated across components was between £0.89m and £11.88m. Certain components were audited to a 
local statutory audit materiality that was also less than our overall Group materiality.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and 
undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope 
of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example 
in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2020: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £9.9m 
(2020: £11.4m) for the Group financial statements and £26.25m (2020: £26.25m) for the Company financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors – the history of misstatements, risk assessment 
and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls – and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range 
was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £0.66m 
(Group audit) (2020: £0.8m) and £1.75m (Company audit) (2020: £1.75m) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our 
view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern 
basis of accounting included:
•	 Testing the mathematical integrity of the cash flow forecasts and the models and reconciled these to Board-approved budgets;
•	 Identifying the key assumptions included in the Group’s base case scenario (as described in note 1 of the consolidated financial 
statements), which we determined to be revenue growth and margins, particularly in civil aerospace, taking account of the impact 
of COVID-19 and the pace of anticipated recovery. We evaluated these key assumptions by: 
–	 Revenue – We compared these assumptions to external industry benchmarks, including forecasts for civil OE fleet sizes, civil 
aerospace passenger traffic measured using RPKs, territory defence spend budgets and territory inflation projections; and
–	 Margin – We compared these assumptions to historical margins and considered the feasibility of margin improvements 
throughout the assessment period.
•	 Reviewing the debt agreements to confirm the terms and conditions, including covenants. The covenants were consistent with 
those used in management’s going concern assessment;
•	 Agreeing all borrowings as at 31 December 2021 to third-party confirmations and considered the Group’s available financing 
and maturity profile. This supported the Directors’ conclusion that sufficient liquidity headroom remained throughout the 
assessment period;
•	 Testing the mathematical accuracy of the covenant calculations, including confirming that the adjustments recorded to determine 
underlying EBITDA agreed to the terms of the covenant. We concluded that covenant compliance remained throughout the 
assessment period;
•	 Assessing management’s reverse stress test (as described in note 1 of the consolidated financial statements) and the extent to 
which such a scenario is plausible, specifically to understand the change in forecast net debt or underlying EBITDA required to 
breach the financial covenant ratio. We concurred with the Directors’ conclusion that the likelihood of such a set of circumstances 
occurring to be remote and significantly outside any severe but plausible scenarios the Group has modelled;
•	 On 21 September 2021, the shareholders of the Group approved an all-cash offer of 800 pence per share for the Group by Parker. 
In the event the acquisition by Parker is completed within the going concern assessment period, the directors considered the 
impact on the Group’s going concern assessment. We have performed the following audit procedures on this scenario:
–	 Examining documentation regarding Parker’s ability to finance the proposed acquisition, including bridge credit and term 
loan agreements and recent financial results published by Parker. We did not identify any evidence to suggest that Parker 
could not finance the proposed acquisition, including the repayment of Meggitt liabilities falling due on a change of control; 
and
–	 Examining intention statements outlined in the Scheme Document, including commitments by Parker to continue to run 
the Meggitt business in line with how it currently operates. In addition, we held discussions with management at Parker 
who, based on publicly available information, re-confirmed the intention statements and ability of Parker to finance the 
proposed acquisition.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, 
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for 
a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
167
Financial Statements

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and 
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the Directors’ reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to 
add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered 
it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections 
of this report.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ 
report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information, which includes reporting based on the Task Force on climate-
related financial disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information 
and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of 
assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider 
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are 
required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material 
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of 
this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic report and Directors’ report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies 
Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and 
matters as described below.
Strategic report and Directors’ report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and Directors’ 
report for the year ended 31 December 2021 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we 
did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and Directors’ report.
Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of 
the corporate governance statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other 
information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate 
governance statement, included within the Corporate governance report is materially consistent with the financial statements and 
our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
•	 The Directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
•	 The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and 
an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
•	 The Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern 
basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the Group’s and Company’s ability to 
continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements;
•	 The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s and Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and 
why the period is appropriate; and
•	 The Directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation 
and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any 
necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Our review of the Directors’ statement regarding the longer-term viability of the Group was substantially less in scope than an 
audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the Directors’ process supporting their statement; checking that 
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
168

the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the 
statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their 
environment obtained in the course of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate 
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:
•	 The Directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the 
information necessary for the members to assess the Group’s and Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy;
•	 The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and
•	 The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the Directors’ statement relating to the Company’s 
compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the 
Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements, the Directors are 
responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied 
that they give a true and fair view. The Directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to 
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of 
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic 
alternative but to do so.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, 
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be 
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which 
our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the Group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and 
regulations related to breaches of trade compliance legislation, bribery and corruption legislation, US Government contracting 
regulations, US environmental regulations, aviation regulations including the Federal Aviation Agency and Civil Aviation Authority, 
data protection legislation and competition/antitrust laws, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have 
a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the 
financial statements such as the Companies Act 2006 and international tax legislation. We evaluated management’s incentives and 
opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined 
that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries and management bias in accounting estimates or 
judgements to manipulate results. The Group engagement team shared this risk assessment with the component auditors so that 
they could include appropriate audit procedures in response to such risks in their work. Audit procedures performed by the Group 
engagement team and/or component auditors included:
•	 Held discussions with Meggitt PLC’s Group management, Head of Internal Audit, legal and tax advisors, including consideration of 
known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud.
•	 Evaluated management’s controls designed to prevent and detect irregularities.
•	 Reviewed meeting minutes of the Board, Audit, Nominations, Remuneration, Corporate Responsibility and Finance Committees.
•	 Assessed matters reported on the Group’s Speak Up Line and the results of management’s investigation of such matters.
•	 Challenged assumptions and judgements made by management in their significant accounting estimates and judgements, 
particularly in relation to the key audit matters above.
•	 Identified and tested journal entries based on our risk assessment and evaluated whether there was evidence of management bias 
that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
•	 Incorporated elements of unpredictability into the audit procedures performed.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
169
Financial Statements

Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from 
error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing 
techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. 
We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit 
sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: 
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members as a body in accordance with 
Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume 
responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save 
where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Other required reporting
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
•	 we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
•	 adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from 
branches not visited by us; or
•	 certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
•	 the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the 
accounting records and returns.
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Appointment
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the Directors on 2 October 2003 to audit the 
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2003 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted 
engagement is 19 years, covering the years ended 31 December 2003 to 31 December 2021.
Other matter
As required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.14R, these financial statements 
form part of the ESEF-prepared annual financial report filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct 
Authority in accordance with the ESEF Regulatory Technical Standard (‘ESEF RTS’). This auditors’ report provides no assurance 
over whether the annual financial report has been prepared using the single electronic format specified in the ESEF RTS.
John Ellis (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 
Reading 
2 March 2022
Independent auditors’ report  
to the members of Meggitt PLC continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
170

Notes
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Revenue
5
1,489.2
1,684.1
  Non-GAAP measures
  Exceptional impairment losses and other asset write-downs
10
–
(8.6)
  Other cost of sales
(1,016.8)
(1,192.0)
Cost of sales
 7
(1,016.8)
(1,200.6)
Gross profit
472.4
483.5
  Non-GAAP measures
  Exceptional impairment losses and other asset write-downs
10
–
(365.6)
  Other operating costs
(435.7)
(452.7)
Operating costs
7
(435.7)
(818.3)
Operating income
7
26.7
37.5
Net operating costs
(409.0)
(780.8)
Operating profit/(loss)1
5,7
63.4
(297.3)
Finance income
11
0.5
0.5
Finance costs
12
(32.6)
(37.2)
Net finance costs
(32.1)
(36.7)
Profit/(loss) before tax2
31.3
(334.0)
Tax (charge)/credit
13
(0.1)
19.8
Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to equity owners of the Company
 
31.2
(314.2)
Earnings/(loss) per share:
Basic3
14
4.0p
(40.4)p
Diluted4
14
4.0p
(40.4)p
Non-GAAP measures
1  Underlying operating profit
9
177.3
190.5
2  Underlying profit before tax
9
149.3
159.5
3  Underlying basic earnings per share
14
15.4p
16.5p
4  Underlying diluted earnings per share
14
15.4p
16.2p
Consolidated income statement
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
171
Financial Statements

Notes
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to equity owners of the Company
31.2
(314.2)
Items that may be reclassified to the income statement in subsequent years:
Currency translation movements
(6.9)
(79.9)
Movements in fair value of financial liabilities arising from changes in credit risk
(1.3)
1.8
Tax effect
13 
3.2
1.6
 
(5.0)
(76.5)
Items that will not be reclassified to the income statement in subsequent years:
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations
36
115.4
(42.6)
Tax effect
13
(21.8)
10.8
93.6
(31.8)
 
 
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year
 
88.6
(108.3)
 
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year attributable to equity owners of the Company 
119.8
(422.5)
Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
172

Notes
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Non-current assets
Goodwill
17
1,531.8
1,519.5
Development costs
18
524.7
531.9
Programme participation costs
18
19.0
18.7
Other intangible assets
19
306.6
401.1
Property, plant and equipment
20
478.6
458.8
Investments 
21
18.7
20.8
Other receivables
24
18.8
16.5
Contract assets
25
55.8
59.6
Derivative financial instruments
33
10.0
15.0
Deferred tax assets
35
–
19.2
 
2,964.0
3,061.1
Current assets
Inventories
23
455.4
426.9
Trade and other receivables
24
294.5
251.1
Contract assets
25
53.7
48.8
Derivative financial instruments
33
4.8
5.4
Current tax recoverable
8.1
11.5
Cash and cash equivalents
26
190.8
178.6
Assets classified as held for sale
22
–
14.7
 
 
1,007.3
937.0
Total assets
5
3,971.3
3,998.1
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
27
(317.9)
(296.5)
Contract liabilities
28
(62.7)
(50.8)
Derivative financial instruments
33
(3.2)
(21.6)
Current tax liabilities
29
(34.2)
(56.9)
Lease liabilities
30 
(15.6)
(14.7)
Bank and other borrowings
31
(105.3)
(10.5)
Provisions
34
(55.8)
(32.6)
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale
22
–
(3.7)
 
 
(594.7)
(487.3)
Net current assets
 
412.6
449.7
Non-current liabilities
Other payables
27
(3.7)
(8.5)
Contract liabilities
28
(72.6)
(73.9)
Derivative financial instruments
33
(1.3)
(0.3)
Deferred tax liabilities
35
(70.9)
(93.4)
Lease liabilities
30
(153.4)
(129.6)
Bank and other borrowings
31
(696.0)
(796.8)
Provisions
34
(80.3)
(80.3)
Retirement benefit obligations
36
(136.4)
(295.4)
 
(1,214.6)
(1,478.2)
Total liabilities
 
(1,809.3)
(1,965.5)
Net assets
 
2,162.0
2,032.6
Equity
Share capital
37
39.1
39.0
Share premium
1,227.8
1,226.6
Other reserves
15.7
15.7
Hedging and translation reserves
343.9
348.9
Retained earnings
 
535.5
402.4
Total equity attributable to owners of the Company
 
2,162.0
2,032.6
The financial statements on pages 171 to 231 were approved by the Board of Directors on 2 March 2022 and signed on its behalf by: 
Consolidated balance sheet
At 31 December 2021
A Wood
Director
L Burdett
Director
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
173
Financial Statements

Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Notes
Share 
capital  
 
£m
Share 
premium 
 
£m
Other 
reserves*
 
£m
Hedging and 
translation
reserves**
£m
Retained 
earnings 
 
£m
Total 
equity  
 
£m
At 1 January 2020
38.8
1,226.5
15.7
425.4
750.4
2,456.8
Loss for the year
–
–
–
– 
(314.2)
(314.2)
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year:
Currency translation movements: 
  Arising in the year
–
–
–
(35.9)
–
(35.9)
  Currency translation gain transferred from equity
–
–
–
(44.0)
–
(44.0)
Movements in fair value of financial liabilities arising 
from changes in credit risk
–
–
–
1.8
–
1.8
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations
36
–
–
–
–
(42.6)
(42.6)
Other comprehensive expense before tax
–
–
–
(78.1)
(42.6)
(120.7)
Tax
13 
– 
–
–
1.6
10.8
12.4
Other comprehensive expense for the year 
–
–
–
(76.5)
(31.8)
(108.3)
Total comprehensive expense for the year
–
–
–
(76.5)
(346.0)
(422.5)
Employee share schemes:
  Value of services provided
–
–
–
–
(1.7)
(1.7)
  Issue of equity share capital
0.2
0.1
–
–
(0.3)
–
At 31 December 2020
39.0
1,226.6
15.7
348.9
402.4
2,032.6
Profit for the year
–
–
–
–
31.2
31.2
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the 
year:
Currency translation movements: 
  Arising in the year
–
–
–
(6.9)
–
(6.9)
Movements in fair value of financial liabilities arising 
from changes in credit risk
32
–
–
–
(1.3)
–
(1.3)
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations
36
–
–
–
–
115.4
115.4
Other comprehensive (expense)/income before tax
–
–
–
(8.2)
115.4
107.2
Tax
13 
–
–
–
3.2
(21.8)
(18.6)
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the 
year 
–
–
–
(5.0)
93.6
88.6
Total comprehensive (expense)/income for the 
year
–
–
–
(5.0)
124.8
119.8
Employee share schemes:
  Value of services provided
–
–
–
–
9.6
9.6
  Issue of equity share capital
0.1
1.2
–
–
(1.3)
–
At 31 December 2021
 
39.1
1,227.8
15.7
343.9
535.5
2,162.0
*	
Other reserves relate to capital reserves of £14.1m (2020: £14.1m) arising on the acquisition of businesses in 1985 and 1986 where merger accounting was applied and 
a capital redemption reserve of £1.6m (2020: £1.6m) created as a result of the share buyback programme in 2014 and 2015.
** 	 Hedging and translation reserves comprise a credit balance on the hedging reserve of £1.9m (2020: £2.9m) and a credit balance on the translation reserve of  
£342.0m (2020: £346.0m).
Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
174

Notes
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Non-GAAP measures
Cash inflow from operations before business disposal expenses and exceptional operating items
200.6
282.9
Cash outflow from business disposal expenses
44
(3.5)
(5.2)
Cash outflow from exceptional operating items
10
(25.9)
(49.3)
Cash inflow from operations
42
171.2
228.4
Interest received
0.5
0.1
Interest paid 
(28.7)
(32.2)
Tax paid
 
(37.7)
(42.1)
Cash inflow from operating activities
 
105.3
154.2
Investment acquired
21
(0.9)
(7.6)
Deferred consideration paid in respect of business acquired in prior year
(1.0)
–
Businesses disposed
44
16.7
117.0
Capitalised development costs
18
(27.6)
(41.4)
Capitalised programme participation costs
(1.7)
(1.6)
Purchase of intangible assets
(10.7)
(11.0)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
(66.4)
(80.8)
Government grants received in respect of purchase of property, plant and equipment
20
7.4
2.1
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
36.4
1.3
Cash outflow from investing activities
 
(47.8)
(22.0)
Issue of equity share capital
1.3
0.3
Proceeds from bank and other borrowings
1.2
618.6
Repayments of bank and other borrowings
 
(30.5)
(705.8)
Debt issue costs paid
(1.9)
(2.4)
Reverse lease premium received
42
–
3.5
Repayments of lease liabilities
30
(14.9)
(15.4)
Cash outflow from financing activities
 
(44.8)
(101.2)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
12.7
31.0
Cash and cash equivalents at start of the year
178.6
155.3
Exchange losses on cash and cash equivalents
 
(0.5)
(7.7)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
26
190.8
178.6
Consolidated cash flow statement
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
175
Financial Statements

1.	General information and basis of preparation
Meggitt PLC is a public limited company listed on the London Stock Exchange, domiciled and incorporated in the United 
Kingdom with the registered number 432989. Its registered office is Pilot Way, Ansty Business Park, Coventry, England, CV7 9JU.
Meggitt PLC is the parent company of a Group whose principal activities during the year were the design and manufacture of 
high performance components and sub-systems for aerospace, defence and other specialist markets, including energy, medical, 
industrial and test.
On 31 December 2020, IFRS as adopted by the European Union at that date was brought into UK law and became UK-adopted 
International Accounting Standards, with future changes being subject to endorsement by the UK Endorsement Board. 
The Group transitioned to UK-adopted International Accounting Standards in its consolidated financial statements on 1 January 
2021. This change constitutes a change in accounting framework. However, there is no impact on recognition, measurement or 
disclosure in the year reported as a result of the change in framework.
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting 
Standards and with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies reporting under those standards. 
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and under the historical cost convention, 
as modified by the revaluation of certain financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative financial instruments) at 
fair value.
Going concern
The Directors have formed a judgement, at the time of approving the financial statements, that there is a reasonable expectation 
that the Group and Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for a period of at least 12 months from 
the date of approval of the Annual Report. For this reason, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing 
the Group’s consolidated financial statements and the Company’s financial statements. 
In making a judgement as to whether the going concern principle should be adopted, the Directors have considered the period 
starting with the date these financial statements were approved by the Board and ending on 31 March 2023. In reaching this 
judgement, the Directors considered:
Existing financing
During 2021, the Group arranged a new USD410m revolving credit facility maturing in 2024, to replace a USD575m forward start 
revolving credit facility which was due to mature in September 2022. Following this refinancing, the Group has committed credit 
facilities with its relationship banks and private placement investors of £1,183.1m at the balance sheet date. With the exception of 
one tranche of USD125m private placement debt, which is due for repayment in June 2022, no other facilities mature during the 
going concern assessment period.
Current liquidity
At 31 December 2021, the Group had significant headroom against its committed credit facilities, as set out below, and no new 
financing is required to meet the repayment of the USD125m private placement debt in June 2022.
Total
£’m
Committed credit facilities
1,183.1
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)
801.3
Less: cash (see note 26)
(190.8)
Net borrowings excluding lease liabilities
610.5
Headroom
572.6
Covenants
The Group’s committed credit facilities contain two financial ratio covenants – net debt/EBITDA and interest cover (EBITA/net 
finance costs). The covenant calculations are drafted to protect the Group from potential volatility caused by accounting standard 
changes, sudden movements in exchange rates and exceptional items. This is achieved by measuring each of EBITDA, net debt, 
EBITA and net finance costs on a frozen GAAP basis; excluding exceptional operating items; and retranslating net debt and 
EBITDA at similar average exchange rates. Covenant ratios are required to be measured on a trailing 12-month basis twice a year 
(at 30 June and 31 December), with net debt/EBITDA not to exceed 3.5x and interest cover to be not less than 3.0x.
At 31 December 2021, net debt/EBITDA was 1.9x, well within the Group’s target range of 1.5x to 2.5x and only marginally 
higher than that in the three years prior to the COVID-19 outbreak (2019: 1.5x, 2018: 1.8x and 2017: 1.9x). Interest cover at 
31 December 2021 was 11.3x. No covenant waivers have ever been sought by the Group, including during the period since the 
COVID-19 outbreak.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
176

1.	General information and basis of preparation continued
Going concern continued
Base case scenario
The Group has developed a base case scenario, using its budget for 2022 and forecasts for Q1 2023. It assumes the recovery in 
civil aerospace markets continues and the outlook for defence markets is stable. As the Group is under an offer period under the 
UK Takeover Code, it is not providing financial guidance for 2022 and accordingly the base case scenario assumptions have not 
been disclosed. However, under this scenario, the Group has significant headroom under its existing committed facilities to meet 
its obligations as they fall due and does not breach either of its financial covenant ratios. 
Reverse stress test scenario
The Group has performed a reverse stress test scenario to determine the conditions under which it would be close to breaching either of 
its financial covenant ratios during the going concern assessment period. Under this stressed scenario, the following conditions (which are 
stated on an organic basis i.e. excluding the impacts of currency and M&A) would all need to occur in the assessment period:
•	 Civil aerospace revenue in 2022 is flat compared to 2021, which would represent a 10% reduction compared to the Group’s 
annualised H2 2021 revenue.
•	 Defence revenue reduces by approximately 20% compared to 2021, significantly greater in percentage terms than the 11% 
decline seen in 2021, which was off a strong comparator in 2020.
•	 Direct material cost inflation of 15%.
•	 The Group takes no action to reduce its cost base from the levels assumed in the base case scenario, in response to the lower 
revenues modelled in the stressed scenario; and.
•	 The Group takes no additional actions to preserve cash.
The Group considers the likelihood of such a set of circumstances occurring to be remote and significantly outside any severe but 
plausible scenarios the Group has modelled.
Principal risks
The Group has also considered whether its principal risks (as described on pages 50 to 54 of the Strategic Report) have been 
appropriately reflected in its going concern assessment. The Group has considered the likelihood of the risks taking place during 
the going concern assessment period and, were they to occur, the extent to which the impacts would be experienced during 
this period and the timing of mitigation actions available to the Group. The Board has regularly reviewed these risks throughout 
the year and up to the date of the financial statements and maintains a risk appetite statement with associated risk tolerances to 
ensure that identified risks are managed within acceptable limits. The Group has concluded that its going concern assessment has 
been appropriately adjusted to reflect these risks.
Proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation (Parker-Hannifin)
On 21 September 2021, the shareholders of the Group approved an all-cash offer of 800 pence per share for the Group by Parker-
Hannifin. In the event the proposed acquisition by Parker-Hannifin is completed within the going concern assessment period, the 
Directors considered the intention and ability of Parker-Hannifin to be able to:
•	 finance the equity purchase of the Group; 
•	 repay those liabilities of the Group which would immediately become due on a change of control; and
•	 continue to operate the Group as a going concern for the remainder of the assessment period, post completion.
The Directors believe that Parker-Hannifin will be able to meet these obligations, having taken into account publicly available 
information including:
•	 The Scheme Document, published on 16 August 2021, and approved by the Group’s shareholders on 21 September 2021, 
which included:
–	 the binding commitments given by Parker-Hannifin to HM Government;
–	 the intentions of Parker-Hannifin regarding the Group’s business, employees, pension schemes, locations and research and 
development; and 
–	 a statement from Citibank Global Markets Limited, acting as financial advisor to Parker-Hannifin, that it was satisfied Parker-
Hannifin had sufficient resources to meet in full the cash consideration payable to the Group’s shareholders.
•	 Recent financial results published by Parker-Hannifin including its Annual Report (10K) for the year ended 30 June 2021 (published on 
25 August 2021) and its Q2 results (10Q) for the six months ended 31 December 2021 (published on 4 February 2022), which include 
disclosures regarding its profit and cash generation, existing committed financing facilities and headroom against those facilities.
Conclusion
Based on the above, the Directors have concluded there are no material uncertainties around the Group’s or Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern and it is appropriate to adopt the going concern principle in the financial statements.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
177
Financial Statements

2. Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted by the Group in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are set out 
below. These policies have been applied consistently to all years presented unless stated otherwise.
Basis of consolidation
The Group’s consolidated financial statements consolidate the financial statements of the Company, all of its subsidiaries and the 
Group’s share of the results of its joint ventures.
A subsidiary is an entity over which the Group has control. The Group has control over an entity where the Group is exposed to,  
or has the rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the power over the entity to affect those returns. 
The results of subsidiaries acquired are consolidated from the date on which control transfers to the Group. The results of 
subsidiaries disposed are consolidated up to the date on which control transfers from the Group. Transactions between, and 
balances with, subsidiary companies are eliminated together with unrealised gains on intra-Group transactions. Unrealised losses 
are eliminated to the extent the asset transferred is not impaired. 
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement between the Group and one or more other parties, under which control is shared 
between the parties and the Group and other parties have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. A joint venture is 
accounted for using the equity method whereby the Group’s share of profits and losses of the joint venture is recognised in the 
income statement within net operating costs and its share of net assets and goodwill of the joint venture is recognised as an 
investment. Unrealised gains and losses on transactions with the joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest 
in the arrangements.
The cost of an acquisition is the fair value of consideration provided, including the fair value of contingent consideration, 
measured at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration payable is measured at fair value at each subsequent balance sheet 
date, with changes in fair value recorded in the income statement within net operating costs. Identifiable assets and liabilities of 
an acquired business, meeting the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3, are recognised at fair value at the date of acquisition. 
The extent to which the cost of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Costs directly 
attributable to an acquisition are recognised in the income statement within net operating costs as incurred. 
When a business is acquired, the fair value of its identifiable assets and liabilities are finalised within 12 months of the acquisition 
date. All fair value adjustments are recognised with effect from the date of acquisition and consequently may result in the 
restatement of previously reported financial results. The accounting policies of acquired businesses are changed, where 
necessary, to be consistent with those of the Group.
When a business is disposed, the difference between the fair value of consideration receivable and the value at which the net 
assets of the business were recognised, immediately prior to disposal, is recognised in the income statement within net operating 
costs. Contingent consideration receivable is measured at fair value at the date of disposal in determining the gain or loss 
recognised. It is subsequently measured at fair value at each balance sheet date, with any changes in fair value recognised in the 
income statement within net operating costs. 
When a foreign subsidiary is disposed, the cumulative exchange differences relating to the retranslation of the net investment 
in the foreign subsidiary are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal. This applies only to 
exchange differences recognised in equity after 1 January 2004. Exchange differences arising prior to 1 January 2004 remain in 
equity on disposal as permitted by IFRS 1 (First time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards).
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses recognised in the income statement are excluded from 
the underlying profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Group (see note 
9). They comprise gains or losses made on the disposal or closure of businesses, adjustments to the fair value of contingent 
consideration payable in respect of acquired businesses or receivable in respect of disposed businesses and costs directly 
attributable to the acquisition or disposal of businesses. Additionally in 2021, they include amounts incurred in respect of the 
proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation. Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of 
businesses are included within the appropriate consolidated income statement category, but are highlighted separately in the 
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Foreign currencies
Functional and presentational currency
The Group’s consolidated financial statements are presented in pounds sterling. Items included in the financial statements of 
each of the Group’s subsidiaries are measured using the functional currency of the primary economic environment in which the 
subsidiary operates.
Transactions and balances
Transactions in foreign currencies are recognised at exchange rates prevailing on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets 
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are reported at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. 
Exchange differences on retranslating monetary assets and liabilities are recognised in the income statement within net operating 
costs, except where they relate to qualifying net investment hedges in which case exchange differences are recognised in hedging 
and translation reserves within other comprehensive income.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
178

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Foreign currencies continued
Foreign subsidiaries
The results of foreign subsidiaries are translated at average exchange rates for the year. Assets and liabilities of foreign 
subsidiaries are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences arising from the 
retranslation of the results and net assets of foreign subsidiaries are recognised in hedging and translation reserves within other 
comprehensive income. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising from the acquisition of foreign subsidiaries are treated as 
assets and liabilities of those subsidiaries and retranslated at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. 
Segment reporting
Operating segments are those segments for which results are reviewed by the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) 
to assess performance and make decisions about resources to be allocated. The CODM has been identified as the Board (see 
page 104 of the Corporate governance report). The Group has determined that its segments for the year ended 31 December 
2021, which are unchanged from the prior year, are: Airframe Systems, Engine Systems, Energy & Equipment and Services 
& Support.
The principal profit measure reviewed by the CODM is “underlying operating profit” as defined in note 9. A segmental analysis of 
underlying operating profit is accordingly provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements (see note 5).
Segmental information on assets is provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in respect of “trading assets”, 
which are defined to exclude from total assets, amounts which the CODM does not regularly review at a segmental level (see 
note 5). Excluded assets comprise centrally managed trading assets, goodwill, other intangible assets (excluding software assets), 
investments, derivative financial instruments, deferred tax assets, current tax recoverable, cash and cash equivalents and assets 
classified as held for sale.
No segmental information on liabilities is provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, as no such measure is 
reviewed by the CODM. 
Revenue from external customers
Revenue is recognised when control of goods or services provided by the Group is transferred to the customer at an amount 
reflecting the consideration the Group expects to receive from the customer in exchange for those goods and services. 
There are no significant judgements required in either determining the Group’s performance obligations or, because the majority 
of the Group’s revenue is recognised when goods or services are delivered to the customer, the timing of revenue recognition. 
As revenue is typically recognised at amounts agreed in advance with customers, no significant estimates are required in 
determining transaction prices. 
Transfer of control – At a point in time
For the majority of goods and services provided by the Group, transfer of control occurs when delivery to the customer takes 
place which, depending on the specific terms agreed with the customer, may be when goods are collected from the Group’s 
facilities or when they are delivered either to the customer’s facilities or to a third-party transport agent. The more common 
exceptions to this assessment for when control passes are:
•	 Bill and hold arrangements. Where, under the terms of a contract, a customer agrees to accept title to goods which remain at 
the Group’s facility, and normal credit terms apply, transfer of control occurs when contractual terms have been met, which will 
typically be when goods are completed, packaged and segregated at the Group’s facility.
•	 Goods and services are not distinct performance obligations. Where a contract involves the supply of multiple goods and 
services, the Group has concluded that typically each good and service supplied is a distinct performance obligation. However, 
contracts may require the Group to provide installation and other services specific to the goods but subsequent to their 
delivery. Where installation and other services are specialised, significant and not capable of being performed by another party, 
control of the goods transfers when installation and other services are completed by the Group and not when delivery of the 
goods to the customer takes place.
•	 Goods are delivered subject to consignment arrangements. Where the Group delivers goods to a customer facility, such as 
an airline operator, but retains control of the goods until they are used by the customer, control transfers when the Group is 
notified by the customer of their use.
•	 Goods supplied subject to customer acceptance. Within the aerospace industry, goods are frequently subject to customer 
acceptance testing on delivery, or at the Group’s facilities. Normally the Group is able, through its own testing procedures, to 
predict with reasonable certainty that customer acceptance testing will be successful and accordingly customer acceptance 
testing will not affect the determination of when control passes. However, where the Group cannot predict the outcome with 
reasonable certainty, control is not considered to transfer until the goods have been accepted by the customer.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
179
Financial Statements

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued 
Revenue from external customers continued
Transfer of control – Over time
The principal circumstances in which control transfers over time are where the Group provides goods or services for which it has 
no alternative use and has the enforceable right to payment, plus a reasonable profit margin, throughout the life of the contract. 
An alternative use exists where there are multiple potential OEMs and/or aftermarket customers to whom the Group could 
provide those goods or services.
Certain defence contracts include clauses entitling the Group to be awarded a reasonable profit margin in the event the customer 
cancels for convenience. Where the Group considers such rights to be enforceable; is confident that a reasonable profit margin 
would be awarded regardless of the stage of contract completion and would apply to all costs incurred by the Group; and the 
goods and services have no alternative use, control will transfer over time.
Where a contract is structured such that non-refundable milestone payments are receivable from a customer in advance of work 
being performed, and the Group is reasonably certain at contract inception that the cumulative value of such milestone payments 
will exceed cumulative costs incurred throughout the duration of the contract, control will transfer over time.

Where control transfers over time, the Group considers costs incurred, as a proportion of total expected contract costs, to be the 
most appropriate measure of contract completion. For power-by-the-hour and cost-per-brake-landing contracts this results in 
revenue being recognised when maintenance events are performed. Estimates of total contract costs are required to determine 
the extent to which revenue is recognised in a year. The Group does not consider that any reasonably foreseeable changes in 
these estimates could give rise to a significant impact on revenue recognised in the current year. 
Net transaction price
The majority of the Group’s contracts provide that consideration is receivable by the Group within a short period after control 
of goods and services is transferred to the customer, typically up to three months, and accordingly no significant financing 
component to the consideration receivable exists.
Where a contract includes variable consideration, the Group estimates the variable consideration to which it will be entitled at 
contract inception and revises the estimate throughout the life of the contract. Estimates are constrained until it is highly probable 
that the uncertainty affecting the level of variable consideration has been resolved and a significant reversal of cumulative revenue 
recognised will not arise. For power-by-the-hour and cost-per-brake-landing contracts, this requires the Group to estimate the 
number of aircraft flying hours or landings expected over the contract.
In certain instances the Group will receive contributions from customers during the development phase of an aerospace 
programme, where the Group expects to retain the intellectual property of the developed technology throughout the programme 
life. Such contributions, typically in the form of cash, are treated as customer consideration and initially recognised as a contract 
liability when receivable. Contributions are subsequently included in the transaction price attributable to goods and services 
provided to the customer during the production phase of the programme. Where the contribution is received more than 
12 months in advance of goods and services being provided to the customer and the financing element of the contribution 
is significant, it is separately identified and recognised within finance costs over the period beginning with receipt of the 
contribution and ending when the goods and services are provided to the customer.
Where the Group makes contributions to customers to participate in aerospace programmes, typically in the form of cash, such 
contributions are initially recognised within contract assets provided the Group has received, or it is highly probable that it will 
receive, contracts from the same customer relating to the same aerospace programme (see Programme participation costs policy). 
Where the contribution is made more than 12 months in advance of goods and services being provided to the customer and the 
financing element of the contribution is significant, it is separately identified and recognised within finance income over the period 
beginning with payment of the contribution and ending when the goods and services are provided to the customer. Other than 
such contributions, the Group does not typically incur significant incremental costs to obtain contracts.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
180

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Exceptional operating items
Items which are significant by virtue of their size or nature, are considered non-recurring, and which are excluded from the 
underlying profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Group (see note 9), 
are classified as exceptional operating items. They include, for instance, costs directly attributable to the integration of acquired 
businesses; significant site consolidations and other restructuring costs; incremental income and expenditure directly attributable 
to the COVID-19 pandemic; and in 2021, given their significance, costs in respect of historical environmental matters relating to 
businesses disposed of by Whittaker Corporation prior to its acquisition by the Group in 1999. In 2020, given their significance, 
impairment losses and other asset write-downs arising from the uncertainty facing the commercial aerospace industry were also 
treated as exceptional operating items. 
Exceptional operating items are presented separately on the face of the income statement, where the Group considers it relevant 
to an understanding of the Group’s financial performance. This separate presentation was adopted in 2020 in respect of the 
impairment losses and other asset write-downs as they were in aggregate of such a significance, that the Group considered 
separate presentation to have been appropriate (see note 10). Exceptional operating items which are not presented separately 
on the face of the income statement are included within the appropriate consolidated income statement category, but are 
highlighted separately in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Intangible assets
Goodwill 
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of identifiable assets acquired 
and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and also whenever events or changes 
in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is held at cost less amortisation charged prior to 
1 January 2004 and accumulated impairment losses. 
In the event a business to which goodwill relates is disposed, its attributable goodwill is included in the determination of the 
gain or loss on disposal. Where the Group restructures or reorganises its operations, goodwill relating to affected businesses is 
reallocated using a relative fair value basis.
Research and development
Research expenditure is recognised as an expense in the income statement as incurred. Development costs incurred on 
projects where the Group retains ownership of intellectual property; the related expenditure is separately identifiable and 
measurable; and management are satisfied as to the ultimate technical and commercial viability of the project and that the 
asset will generate future economic benefits based on all relevant available information, are recognised as an intangible 
asset. Capitalised development costs are subsequently held at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. 
Amortisation is charged to net operating costs over the periods expected to benefit, typically up to 15 years, commencing with 
launch of the product. Development costs not meeting the criteria for capitalisation are expensed as incurred. 
Programme participation costs
Programme participation costs are contributions made to OEMs, typically in the form of cash, in connection with their selection 
of the Group’s products for installation onto new aircraft where the Group has obtained principal supplier status. The recognition 
of programme participation costs depends on the contractual relationship between the Group and the third party to whom the 
contribution is made:
•	 Where the contribution is made to a customer under a revenue contract (as defined by IFRS 15), or the award of future IFRS 15 
revenue contracts on the same aerospace programme from the same customer is highly probable such that the Group expects 
the contributions to be recovered, contributions are initially recognised within contract assets (see Revenue from external 
customers policy). These amounts are amortised to revenue as a reduction in the transaction price of those IFRS 15 revenue 
contracts over the period the relevant performance obligations are satisfied by the Group, typically up to 15 years.
•	 Where the contribution is made to a third party other than a customer, contributions are initially recognised as intangible assets 
and subsequently held at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. Amortisation is charged to net operating 
costs over periods expected to benefit from receiving the status of principal supplier, through the sale of replacement parts, 
typically up to 15 years.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
181
Financial Statements

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Intangible assets continued
Other intangible assets – Assets acquired as part of a business combination
The Group recognises intangible assets separately from goodwill provided they are separable or arise from contractual or 
other legal rights and their fair value can be measured reliably. Intangible assets are initially recognised at fair value, which is 
regarded as their cost. Intangible assets are subsequently held at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. 
Amortisation is charged on a straight-line basis to net operating costs over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets. 
The nature of intangible assets recognised and their estimated useful lives are as follows:
Customer relationships
Up to 20 years
Technology
Up to 20 years
Trade names and trademarks
Up to 15 years
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination is excluded from the underlying profit measures used 
by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Group (see note 9).
Other intangible assets – Software and other intangible assets
Software and purchased licences, trademarks and patents are held at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. 
Amortisation is charged on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets, commencing with the date 
the assets are available for use, typically over periods up to ten years. Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually and 
adjusted if appropriate.
Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are held at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost includes expenditure 
directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. For right-of-use assets, cost comprises an amount equal to the initial lease 
liability recognised, adjusted to include any payments made for the right to use the asset, initial direct costs incurred and 
estimated costs for dismantling, removing and restoring the asset at the end of the lease term. Depreciation is charged on a 
straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets, commencing with the date the assets are available for 
use, as follows:
Freehold buildings
Up to 50 years

Right-of-use assets
Shorter of the useful economic life of the asset and the lease term
Plant and machinery
3 to 10 years
Furnaces
Up to 20 years
Fixtures and fittings
3 to 10 years
Motor vehicles
4 to 5 years
Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate. When items of property, plant and equipment 
are disposed, the difference between sale proceeds, net of related costs, and the carrying value of the asset is recognised in the 
income statement. When items of property, plant and equipment are disposed of through a sale and leaseback transaction, the 
Group retains a right-of-use asset following the transaction. In these situations, the amount recognised in the income statement 
on disposal is reduced by the portion of the gain or loss related to those retained rights. The amount not recognised in the 
income statement is recognised as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the construction or production of qualifying assets, are capitalised as part of the cost of 
those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. Qualifying assets are those that necessarily 
take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use, typically at least 12 months. All other borrowing costs are 
recognised in the income statement within finance costs as incurred.
Impairment of non-current non-financial assets
Assets are reviewed for impairment annually and also whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value 
may not be recoverable. To the extent the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the difference is recognised 
as an expense in the income statement. The recoverable amount used for impairment testing is the higher of value in use and fair 
value less costs of disposal. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are generally tested individually or at a CGU level which 
represents the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of cash inflows 
from other assets or groups of assets. Where it is not possible to allocate goodwill on a non-arbitrary basis to individual CGUs, it is 
allocated to the group of CGUs which represent the lowest level within the Group at which goodwill is monitored by management. 
At each balance sheet date, previously recognised impairment losses, other than any relating to goodwill, are reviewed and if no 
longer required reversed with a corresponding credit to the income statement.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
182

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Inventories
Inventories are recognised at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises materials, direct labour, other direct 
costs and related production overheads, based on normal operating capacity, and is determined using the first-in first-out (FIFO) 
method. Production overheads relating to abnormal variations between actual volumes and normal operating capacity are 
excluded from the costs of inventory. Net realisable value is based on estimated selling price, less further costs expected to be 
incurred to completion and disposal. Provision is made for obsolete, slow moving or defective items where appropriate.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost less any impairment losses. 
To the extent outflows of economic benefits required to settle an obligation recognised as a provision are recoverable from an 
insurer or other third party and their recovery is considered virtually certain, typically when a signed binding agreement exists, 
an other receivable is recognised. Other receivables are discounted to present value where the impact is significant, using a 
pre-tax rate. The discount rate used is based on current market assessments of the time value of money, adjusted to reflect any 
risks specific to the receivable which have not been reflected in the undiscounted receivable. The impact of the unwinding of 
discounting is recognised in the income statement within finance income.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and deposits held at call with banks. Bank overdrafts are disclosed as current 
liabilities, within bank and other borrowings, except where the Group participates in offset arrangements with certain banks 
whereby cash and overdraft amounts are offset against each other.
Impairment of financial assets
The Group’s financial assets, which are subject to the expected credit loss (ECL) model, are:
•	 trade receivables;
•	 other receivables; and 
•	 cash and cash equivalents.
For trade receivables, the simplified method has been applied whereby ECLs are measured using a lifetime expected loss 
allowance. Expected loss rates are based on historical ageing of receivables adjusted for risk-based estimates of future losses. 
The historical data is assessed over a period that reflects the current conditions and may change year on year. 
For other receivables, which principally relate to amounts recoverable from insurers and other third parties in respect of 
environmental matters, ECLs are measured using those expected to arise in the 12 months subsequent to the balance sheet date. 
For cash and cash equivalents, the Group does not currently anticipate any future credit losses given the high quality credit rating 
of the financial institutions with which balances are held.
Trade and other payables
Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost. Trade payables are not 
interest bearing.
The Group operates a supplier financing programme whereby suppliers can elect, on an invoice-by-invoice basis, to receive 
discounted early payment from a bank, rather than being paid directly by the Group in line with agreed payment terms. In the 
event the option for early payment is taken by a supplier, the amount payable by the Group remains unchanged but is assigned by 
the supplier under the programme as payable by the Group to the bank. The Group assesses the programme against indicators to 
assess if liabilities should be classified as other payables or borrowings. Under the Group’s current supplier financing programme, 
contractual rights and obligations of the supplier and Group are not substantively modified when a supplier elects to participate 
in the programme, credit terms agreed between the Group and the bank do not differ significantly from those agreed by the 
Group with suppliers who do not participate in the programme; no additional security is provided by the Group to the bank; 
and to the extent the Group has existing committed or uncommitted facility arrangements with the same bank, the amounts 
due under the supplier financing programme are not considered by the bank to represent utilisation of those existing facilities. 
Accordingly, provided amounts due to the bank do not exceed agreed credit terms, they are classified as other payables. If the 
Group exceeds agreed credit terms, amounts that are overdue are classified as bank borrowings.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
183
Financial Statements

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Taxation
Current tax is based on taxable profit for the year, calculated using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance 
sheet date. Deferred tax is provided in full using the liability method on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets 
and liabilities and their corresponding book values as recognised in the Group’s consolidated financial statements. It is calculated 
using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is provided on unremitted earnings of 
foreign subsidiaries, except where the Group can control the remittance and it is probable that earnings will not be remitted in the 
foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent it is probable that taxable profits will be available against 
which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Current tax and deferred tax are recognised in the income statement, 
other comprehensive income or directly in equity, depending on where the item to which they relate has been recognised.
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of past events, it is 
probable an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. 
The Group typically uses a weighted average of outcomes assessed as possible to determine the liabilities required, unless a 
single best estimate of the outcome is considered to be more appropriate. Assessments are made at the level of an individual tax 
uncertainty, unless uncertainties are considered to be related in which case they are grouped together. Liabilities, which are not 
discounted given the short period over which they are expected to be utilised, are included within current tax liabilities, together 
with any liability for penalties, which to date have not been significant. Any liability relating to interest on tax liabilities is included 
within finance costs.
Bank and other borrowings
Bank and other borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, being proceeds received less directly attributable transaction 
costs incurred. Borrowings are generally subsequently held at amortised cost at each balance sheet date, with any transaction costs 
amortised to the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. Certain borrowings 
are in a fair value hedge relationship with the Group’s interest rate swaps. Such borrowings are measured at amortised cost but 
have a fair value adjustment recognised as a result of the fair value hedge relationship. Movements in fair value recognised in 
net operating costs are excluded from the underlying profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying 
performance of the Group (see note 9).
Any related interest accruals are included within borrowings. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an 
unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
Leases
The majority of the Group’s leases relate to property. A lease liability is recognised when the Group obtains control of the right-
of-use asset, that is the subject of the lease. The initial lease liability recognised represents the discounted value of payments 
due under the lease less any incentives receivable. Where lease payments are variable, often because they are based on future 
inflation rates or indices, they are initially measured using the inflation rate or index value at lease inception. Typically the 
interest rate implicit in the Group’s leases cannot be easily determined and accordingly the Group’s incremental borrowing rate, 
for borrowings of similar amounts and maturity periods, is used to discount amounts due under the lease. The lease liability is 
subsequently measured using the effective interest method, with interest recognised within finance costs.
At inception, the Group evaluates whether it is reasonably certain that any option to extend a lease term will be exercised. 
Typically, where the initial lease term for a property used for the Group’s manufacturing operations is for at least five years, 
the option to extend the lease term is at market rates and the right-of-use asset is not considered specialised, the Group will 
not assess the likelihood of the lease being extended at inception as reasonably certain. The Group continues to evaluate the 
likelihood of exercising such options however throughout the initial lease term. When the Group is committed to extending 
the lease, having considered the alternative options available and where appropriate lessor consent to the extension has been 
obtained, the Group will consider the option to be reasonably certain to be exercised. When an option is reasonably certain to be 
exercised, the right-of-use asset and lease liabilities recognised are adjusted to reflect the extended term.
Leases, which at inception have a term of less than 12 months or relate to low-value assets, are not recognised on the balance 
sheet. Payments made under such leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
184

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued 
Derivative financial instruments and hedging
The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to interest rate risk and foreign currency transactional 
risk. Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and 
are subsequently held at fair value at each balance sheet date, using values determined indirectly from quoted prices that are 
observable for the asset or liability. 
The method by which any gain or loss arising from subsequent measurement at fair value is recognised, depends on whether the 
instrument is designated as a hedging instrument and if so the nature of the item hedged. The Group recognises an instrument 
as a hedging instrument by documenting, at its inception, the economic relationship between the instrument and the hedged 
item and the objectives and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction. To be designated as a hedging instrument, an 
instrument must also be assessed, at inception and on an ongoing basis, to be effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash 
flows of hedged items as outlined in the objectives and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction and any changes in fair 
values must not be dominated by the effect of credit risk. 
To the extent the maturity of the derivative financial instruments are more than 12 months from the balance sheet date, they are 
classified as non-current assets or non-current liabilities. All other derivative financial instruments are classified as current assets or 
current liabilities. 
Fair value hedges
Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments, that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, are recognised 
in the income statement within net operating costs together with changes in fair value of the hedged item not attributable to 
credit risk. Changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to credit risk are recognised in other comprehensive income. 
Any difference recognised in the income statement between movements in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item 
is excluded from the underlying profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the 
Group (see note 9). The Group currently applies fair value hedge accounting to the hedging of fixed interest rate risk on bank and 
other borrowings. 
Net investment hedges
Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of any net investment hedge are recognised in other comprehensive 
income. Changes in the fair value of any ineffective portion are recognised immediately in the income statement within net 
operating costs. 
Derivatives not meeting the criteria for hedge accounting
Where derivatives do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, changes in fair value are recognised immediately in the income 
statement within net operating costs. Gains and losses arising from measuring these derivatives at fair value are excluded from the 
underlying profit measures used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying performance of the Group (see note 9). 
Provisions
Provision is made for environmental liabilities, onerous contracts, product warranty claims and other liabilities when the Group 
has a present obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle 
the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. In determining the estimated costs to fulfil a contract, the Group 
includes only incremental direct costs (e.g. direct materials and direct labour). The Group typically uses a single most likely 
outcome approach to determine the provision recognised unless, for instance in the case of product warranty claims, a weighted 
average of all possible outcomes is considered more appropriate. Provisions are discounted to present value where the impact 
is significant, using a pre-tax rate. The discount rate used is based on current market assessments of the time value of money, 
adjusted to reflect any risks specific to the obligation which have not been reflected in the undiscounted provision. The impact of 
the unwinding of discounting is recognised in the income statement within finance costs.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
185
Financial Statements

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued 
Retirement benefit schemes
For defined benefit schemes, pension costs and the costs of providing other post-retirement benefits, principally healthcare, are 
charged to the income statement in accordance with the advice of qualified independent actuaries. Past service credits and costs 
and curtailment gains and losses are recognised immediately in the income statement.
Retirement benefit obligations represent, for each scheme, the difference between the fair value of the schemes’ assets and the 
present value of the schemes’ defined benefit obligations measured at the balance sheet date. The defined benefit obligation is 
measured annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit 
obligation is determined by discounting the defined benefit obligations using interest rates of high quality corporate bonds 
denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid and with terms to maturity comparable with the terms of the 
related defined benefit obligations. Where the assets of a scheme exceed its defined benefit obligations, a retirement benefit 
asset is recognised equal to the lower of this surplus and the asset ceiling. The asset ceiling represents the present value of any 
economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the scheme or reductions in future contributions to the scheme and 
to which the Group has an unconditional right to. Changes in the asset ceiling are recognised in other comprehensive income, 
except for any related interest which is recognised in finance costs. Where the Group has a statutory or contractual minimum 
funding requirement to make contributions to a scheme in respect of past service and any such contributions are not available to 
the Group once paid (as a reduction in future contributions, or as a refund to which the Group has an unconditional right either 
during the life of the scheme or when the scheme liabilities are settled), an additional liability for such amounts is recognised.
Remeasurement gains and losses are recognised in the year in which they arise in other comprehensive income.
For defined contribution schemes, payments are recognised in the income statement when they fall due. The Group has no 
further obligations once the contributions have been paid.
Share-based compensation
The Group operates a number of share-based compensation schemes, which are subject to non-market-based vesting conditions 
and are principally equity-settled. For equity-settled schemes, at the date of grant, the Group estimates the number of awards 
expected to vest as a result of vesting conditions. The fair value of this estimated number of awards is recognised as an expense 
in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period for which services are received. At each balance sheet date, the 
Group revises its estimate of the number of awards expected to vest and adjusts the amount recognised cumulatively in the 
income statement to reflect the revised estimate. When awards are exercised and the Company issues new shares, the proceeds 
received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium.
Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are deducted from 
the proceeds recognised in equity. Own shares represent shares in the Company that are held by an independently managed 
Employee Share Ownership Plan. Consideration paid for own shares, including any incremental directly attributable costs, is 
recognised as a deduction from retained earnings. 
Dividends
Interim dividends are recognised when paid to shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when approved by the shareholders. 
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
186

2.	Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Adoption of new and revised accounting standards
Phase 2 amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 for interest rate benchmark (IBOR) reform
The phase 2 amendments relating to interest rate benchmark reform address issues arising due to the replacement of one 
benchmark rate with an alternative one. The following financial instruments held by the Group are impacted by IBOR reform:
Carrying value at 31 December 2021
 
Interest rate  
benchmark impacted
Transitioned to  
alternative rate
Assets
£’m
Liabilities
£’m
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31):
Syndicated credit facility (USD410m) – GBP borrowings
GBP LIBOR
SONIA*
–
–
Syndicated credit facility (USD410m) – USD borrowings
USD LIBOR
Not yet transitioned*
–
–
Bilateral facility: Caixabank (GBP30m)
GBP LIBOR
SONIA**
–
(30.0)
Bilateral facility: SMBC (GBP50m)
GBP LIBOR
SONIA**
–
–
Bilateral facility: Bank of America (USD50m) 
USD LIBOR
SOFR**
–
–
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33):
Interest rate swaps (USD125m)
USD LIBOR Not yet transitioned***
1.7
–
Total financial instruments exposed to IBOR reform
 
1.7
(30.0)
*	
The Group refinanced its syndicated credit facility in November 2021; the facility was and remains undrawn. The updated facility amended the interest calculation 
methodology from referencing GBP LIBOR to compounded SONIA in the first utilisation after execution and from USD LIBOR to SOFR on a future date to be 
agreed (long-stop 30 June 2023); until this date, a USD drawing would continue to reference USD LIBOR.
**	
The Group refinanced its three bilateral facilities in December 2021 to adopt the same interest calculation methodology as that in the refinanced syndicated credit 
facility. Only the Caixabank facility is drawn; the first rollover of the drawing subsequent to the refinancing will reference SONIA. The SMBC facility and the Bank of 
America facility are undrawn. If and when amounts are drawn under these facilities they would reference SONIA and SOFR respectively.
***	 The Group’s interest rate swaps are in a fair value hedge relationship with the Group’s USD fixed rate 2010 senior notes. Both the hedged items and hedging 
instruments mature in June 2022, prior to when the referenced USD LIBOR interest rate is expected to cease being published. 
There are no changes to the Group’s risk management strategy as a result of IBOR reform. Changes to IT systems, specifically 
the treasury management system, are in progress to enable the new reference rates to be used in calculations of interest on 
external borrowings.
No other accounting standards, amendments or revisions to existing standards, or interpretations have become effective which 
had a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements. 
Recent accounting developments
Amendments to IAS 37 “Onerous contracts – costs of fulfilling a contract”
Under IAS 37, a contract is onerous when the unavoidable costs of meeting the contractual obligations exceed the economic 
benefits arising from the contract. Prior to the amendments to IAS 37, there was diversity in practice as to whether the costs of 
meeting contractual obligations should comprise only incremental costs (e.g. direct materials and direct labour) or also include 
an allocation of other direct costs (e.g. factory overheads) which would be incurred regardless of whether the contract was being 
performed or not. Under the Group’s current accounting policy, it only includes incremental direct costs in measuring the costs 
to fulfil a contract under IAS 37. The IAS 37 amendments clarify however, that the costs of fulfilling a contract should include an 
allocation of other direct costs. The amendments are effective for accounting periods beginning on, or after, 1 January 2022 to 
open contracts at that date, with any additional amounts required to be recognised as an adjustment to retained earnings at 
that date. The Group is in the process of finalising the impact of these amendments, but currently estimates the amendments 
will result in the recognition of new onerous contract provisions of approximately £20.0m (in respect of contracts which are 
not onerous on an incremental direct cost basis), an increase in the measurement of existing onerous contract provisions of 
approximately £5.0m and an increase in the measurement of existing product warranty claims of approximately £5.0m. 
A number of other additional new standards and amendments and revisions to existing standards have been published and 
are mandatory for the Group’s future accounting periods. These have not been early adopted and are not expected to have a 
significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements when they are adopted. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
187
Financial Statements

3.	Financial risk management
Financial risk factors
The Group’s operations expose it to a number of financial risks including market risk (principally foreign exchange risk and interest 
rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. These risks are managed by a centralised treasury department, in accordance with Board-
approved objectives, policies and authorities (see also pages 45 and 47 of the Chief Financial Officer’s review). Regular reports 
monitor exposures and assist in managing the associated risks. 
Market risk
Foreign exchange risk
The Group operates internationally and is subject to foreign exchange risks on future commercial transactions and the 
retranslation of the results of, and net investments in, foreign subsidiaries. The principal exposure arises with respect to the US 
dollar against the pound sterling. To mitigate risks associated with future commercial transactions, the Group policy is to hedge 
known and certain forecast transaction exposures based on historical experience and projections. The Group hedges at least 
70% of the next 12 months anticipated exposures and can hedge expected exposures up to five years. Details of hedges in place 
are provided in note 33. The Group does not hedge exposure arising from the retranslation of the results of foreign subsidiaries. 
The Group uses borrowings denominated in the relevant currencies to partially hedge its net investments in foreign subsidiaries.
Interest rate risk
The Group has borrowings issued at both fixed and floating rates of interest. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group 
to fair value interest rate risk, whereas borrowings issued at floating rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. 
The Group’s principal exposure is to changes in US interest rates. The Group’s policy is to generally maintain at least 25% of its 
net borrowings at fixed rates and mitigates interest rate risks through interest rate derivatives which have the economic effect of 
converting fixed rate borrowings into floating rate borrowings and floating rate borrowings into fixed rate borrowings. Details of 
hedges in place are provided in note 33.
Sensitivity analysis
The table below illustrates the sensitivity of the Group’s results to changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and 
pound sterling and to changes in US interest rates at the balance sheet date. The analysis covers only financial assets and 
liabilities held at the balance sheet date and is made on the basis of the hedge designations in place on those dates, assuming no 
hedge ineffectiveness.
2021
2020
Income 
statement 
£’m
Equity
 
£’m
Income 
statement 
£’m
Equity
 
£’m
US dollar/sterling exchange rate +/- 10%
25.0
79.0
37.8
80.3
US yield curve +/- 1%
2.9
–
6.3
–
The impact on equity from movements in the exchange rate comprises £78.3m (2020: £78.3m) in respect of US dollar net 
borrowings, and £0.7m (2020: £2.0m) in respect of other financial assets and liabilities. However, as all US dollar net borrowings 
are designated as a net investment hedge, or are held by US subsidiaries, this element of the impact is entirely offset by the 
retranslation of foreign subsidiaries. The impact of a 1% movement in the US yield curve includes the effect on the Group’s foreign 
currency forward contracts and other financial assets and liabilities.
Credit risk
Concentration of credit risk on the Group’s trade and other receivables and contract assets is spread across a large number 
of customers and third parties across the world. In addition, many of the Group’s principal customers are either government 
departments or large multinationals. Note 32 details the Group’s credit risk exposures in relation to its customers. Policies are 
maintained to ensure the Group makes sales to customers with an appropriate credit history. Letters of credit, or other 
appropriate instruments, are put in place to reduce credit risk where considered necessary. The Group is also subject to credit risk 
on the counterparties to its other financial assets and financial liabilities which it controls through only dealing with highly rated 
counterparties and netting transactions on settlement wherever possible. The credit quality of the Group’s counterparties is set 
out in notes 32 and 33.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
188

3.	Financial risk management continued
Liquidity risk
The Group maintains sufficient committed facilities to meet projected borrowing requirements based on cash flow forecasts. 
Additional headroom is maintained to protect against the variability of cash flows and to accommodate small bolt-on acquisitions. 
Key ratios are monitored to ensure continued compliance with covenants contained in the Group’s principal credit agreements. 
The following tables analyse the Group’s derivative financial instruments and other non-derivative financial liabilities at the 
balance sheet date. The amounts disclosed in the tables are the contractual undiscounted cash flows:
2021
Less 
than 
1 year 
£’m
Between 1 
and  
5 years
£’m
Greater 
than 
5 years
£’m
Total
£’m
Trade and other payables*
305.5
2.9
0.8
309.2
Derivative financial instruments (Inflows)**
(4.8)
(1.5)
–
(6.3)
Lease liabilities
21.1
67.4
133.1
221.6
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)
95.5
698.6
0.2
794.3
Interest payments on borrowings
24.6
55.0
0.2
79.8
Total
441.9
822.4
134.3
1,398.6
2020
Less 
than 
1 year 
£’m
Between 1 
and  
5 years
£’m
Greater  
than 
5 years
£’m
Total
£’m
Trade and other payables*
285.8
7.7
0.8
294.3
Derivative financial instruments (Inflows)**
(3.9)
(1.7)
–
(5.6)
Lease liabilities
19.5
61.4
112.1
193.0
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)
2.2
576.1
219.8
798.1
Interest payments on borrowings
26.7
71.0
7.9
105.6
Total
330.3
714.5
340.6
1,385.4
*	
Excludes social security and other taxes of £12.4m (2020: £10.7m) (see note 27).
**	
Assumes no change in interest rates from those prevailing at the balance sheet date.
Capital risk management
The Group’s objective when managing its capital structure is to minimise the cost of capital whilst maintaining adequate capital to 
protect against volatility in earnings and net assets. The strategy is designed to maximise shareholder return over the long term. 
The Group’s capital structure is as follows: 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Net debt (see note 43)
779.5
773.0
Total equity
2,162.0
2,032.6
Debt/equity %
36.1%
38.0%
The Board believes that in maintaining an efficient balance sheet, a net debt:EBITDA ratio of between 1.5x and 2.5x is appropriate, 
whilst retaining the flexibility to move outside the range if appropriate. Further details on the Group’s strategy for delivering net 
debt:EBITDA in this range can be found on pages 45 and 47 of the Chief Financial Officer’s review, which includes details on how 
the Group has complied with the two principal financial covenant requirements contained in its committed credit facilities.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
189
Financial Statements

4.	Critical accounting estimates and judgements
In applying the Group’s accounting policies set out in note 2, the Group is required to make certain estimates and judgements 
concerning the future. These estimates and judgements are regularly reviewed and revised as necessary. The estimates and 
judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements are described 
below. Further consideration of these critical estimates and judgements can be found in the Audit Committee report on pages 114 
to 121.
Critical accounting estimates
Environmental provisions and associated recoveries from insurers and other third parties 
The Group is involved in the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at certain sites for which it has been 
identified as a potentially responsible party under US law. In determining the provision to be recognised, advice is received by 
the Group from its environmental consultants and legal advisors to assist in the estimate of the level and timing of remediation 
costs, including the period for which operations and monitoring (O&M) activities will be required. These estimates are revised 
regularly as remediation activities progress and further information is obtained on the extent of activities for which the Group 
is responsible.
During the latter part of 2021, a jury determined that Whittaker Corporation was responsible to a third party for certain material 
amounts. These material amounts have been attributed by the jury to environmental pollution resulting from past operations at 
one of Whittaker Corporation’s former sites, which it had sold prior to its acquisition by the Group in 1999. The adverse jury finding 
has resulted in Whittaker concluding that, when the relevant court issues its final ruling, it is probable Whittaker will need to 
contribute to the third-party costs, with the amounts recognised based on its best estimate of the most likely outcome, resulting 
in a charge to the income statement in the year of £29.5m.
The liability, for which the Group may ultimately be responsible is however subject to a number of significant uncertainties, which 
may be resolved through mediation or alternatively end up in a court appeal process. It is therefore reasonably foreseeable that 
material adjustments (either increases to, or reductions in) the amounts recognised as a provision may be required in the next 
12 months. The Group has not quantified its estimate of the adjustments that may be required as it could be seriously prejudicial 
to the outcome.
The Group has insurance arrangements in place which, together with other agreements with third parties, mitigate the ongoing 
impact of historical environmental events on the Group. A receivable has been established to the extent amounts are virtually 
certain to be recoverable from these parties, typically when there is a signed binding agreement between the parties.
With regards to the matter for which the liability of £29.5m referred to above has been recognised in the year, the Group is 
currently seeking recovery from a number of historic insurers and third parties, including litigation with the historic insurers. 
The Group expects to receive material amounts in respect of these recoveries but, in the absence of signed binding settlement 
agreements with the parties, has not recognised these as meeting the virtually certain threshold. It is reasonably foreseeable 
however, that material amounts will meet this threshold for recognition within the next 12 months. The amounts the Group expects 
to recover are not disclosed as it could be seriously prejudicial to the outcome.
The Group had not previously considered it to be reasonably foreseeable that there would be a material impact on the income 
statement in 2021 arising from the specific matter referred to above, based on conditions that existed at that time. However, 
subsequent to the date this assessment was last made, Whittaker received adverse pre-trial motions as to the nature of the costs it 
could be considered liable for, a material increase in the amounts claimed by the third party, together with the adverse jury finding 
described above.
Capitalised development costs: Irkut MC-21
The Group’s capitalised development costs include £40.9m (2020: £39.6m) relating to the Irkut MC-21 aircraft, which is due to 
enter service in 2022. The capitalised amount is supported by an impairment test performed by the Group in Q4 2021, taking into 
account third-party estimates of fleet volumes and utilisation. 
During 2022, tensions between Russia and the West have escalated and, in the period immediately preceding the date of 
this Annual Report, has seen Russian troops enter Ukraine with Western countries imposing a number of sanctions on Russia 
in response. It is impracticable at the date of these consolidated financial statements to determine the possible effects this 
escalation of the conflict will have on the future of the aircraft programme or the ability of the Group to access benefits from 
it. However, it is reasonably foreseeable that a material impairment loss on the programme could be recognised in the next 
12 months.
Retirement benefit obligations
The liability recognised in respect of retirement benefit obligations is dependent on a number of estimates, principally those 
relating to mortality, inflation and the rate at which liabilities are discounted. External actuarial advice is taken with regard to the 
most appropriate assumptions to use. Further details on these estimates and sensitivities of the retirement benefit obligations to 
these estimates are provided in note 36.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
190

4.	Critical accounting estimates and judgements continued
Critical accounting estimates continued
Area no longer considered a critical accounting estimate
The Group previously disclosed in its 2020 Annual Report, a critical accounting estimate relating to significant estimation 
uncertainty in its forward-looking assessments of cash flows used in assessing goodwill for impairment, following the COVID-19 
pandemic and the dramatic impact on the commercial aerospace industry. As set out in note 17, the Group no longer believes that 
any reasonably foreseeable changes in estimates would result in a material impairment of goodwill in the next 12 months. 
Critical accounting judgements
Capitalisation of development costs
The Group is required to make judgements as to when development costs meet the criteria to be recognised as intangible 
assets. The majority of capitalised development costs relate to technology developed for aerospace programmes. In such cases, 
costs are typically not capitalised until a contract to develop the technology is awarded by a customer as, prior to this date, it is 
generally not possible to reliably estimate the point at which research activities conclude and development activities commence. 
Absent a contract to develop the technology, the Group also does not believe there is generally sufficient certainty over the future 
economic benefits that will be generated from the technology, to allow capitalisation of costs. Once such a contract is awarded, 
the Group capitalises development costs provided it expects to retain the intellectual property in the technology throughout 
substantially all of the life of the aircraft or engine and it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group. 
In making a judgement as to whether economic benefits will flow to the Group, it makes estimates of aircraft or engine volumes 
(taking into account the extent to which the Group has a sole-source position); aftermarket revenues which are dependent on 
aircraft utilisation, fleet lives and operator service routines; costs of manufacture; and costs to complete the development activity. 
Estimates of aircraft or engine volumes reflect the Group’s judgement as to the extent to which the impacts of climate change 
may impact the future OE and aftermarket revenues it will derive from the aerospace programme. This takes into account its 
assessment of the likelihood that programme lives will be maintained by multiple technical upgrades over their lifetime, to boost 
fuel efficiency and support the move to the use of growing fractions of Sustainable Aviation Fuel, rather than programme lives 
being significantly shortened.
During 2021, the Group recognised £27.6m (2020: £41.4m) of development costs as an intangible asset (see note 18).
Area no longer considered a critical accounting judgement
The Group previously disclosed in its 2020 Annual Report, a critical accounting judgement relating to the Directors’ assessment 
that the adoption of the going concern basis in the Group’s consolidated financial statements was appropriate. For the reasons set 
out in note 1, this is no longer considered a critical judgment for the current year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
191
Financial Statements

5.	Segmental analysis 
Analysis by operating segment – current year
The Group manages its businesses under four customer-aligned divisions: Airframe Systems, Engine Systems, Energy & 
Equipment and Services & Support. Details of the Group’s divisions can be found on pages 34 to 41 of the Strategic Report. 
Transactions between divisions are reflected in the segmental information below, are measured at arm’s length and are eliminated 
on consolidation. 
Year ended 31 December 2021: Analysis of income statement items
The key performance measure reviewed by the CODM is underlying operating profit. A detailed reconciliation of operating profit 
to underlying operating profit is provided in note 9.
Airframe 
Systems 
£’m
Engine 
Systems
£’m
Energy & 
Equipment 
£’m
Services & 
Support
£’m
Total 
 
£’m
Gross segment revenue
863.6
289.6
281.4
278.8
1,713.4
Inter-segment revenue
(126.6)
(81.8)
(10.7)
(5.1)
(224.2)
Revenue from external customers
737.0
207.8
270.7
273.7
1,489.2
At a point in time
696.1
202.8
119.7
268.7
1,287.3
Over time: Power by the hour/cost per brake landing
24.1
4.1
–
5.0
33.2
Over time: Other
16.8
0.9
151.0
–
168.7
Revenue from external customers by basis of recognition
737.0
207.8
270.7
273.7
1,489.2
Civil OE
170.8
89.4
–
–
260.2
Civil aftermarket
201.8
3.4
–
219.5
424.7
Defence
343.5
96.6
126.5
53.4
620.0
Energy
11.6
1.7
121.4
0.3
135.0
Other
9.3
16.7
22.8
0.5
49.3
Revenue from external customers by end market
737.0
207.8
270.7
273.7
1,489.2
Underlying operating profit/(loss) (see note 9)*
120.2
(16.5)
42.1
31.5
177.3
Items not affecting underlying operating profit (see note 9)
(113.9)
Operating profit (see note 9)
63.4
Finance income (see note 11)
0.5
Finance costs (see note 12)
(32.6)
Net finance costs
(32.1)
Profit before tax
31.3
Tax charge (see note 13)
(0.1)
Profit for the year
31.2
Exceptional operating items**
2.7
10.8
1.3
(0.1)
14.7
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets (see notes 18 and 19)***
101.5
26.8
8.8
2.0
139.1
Depreciation (see note 20)****
27.1
16.3
7.9
3.4
54.7
*	
Central costs are allocated using a variety of bases designed to reflect the beneficial relationship between costs and segments. Bases include headcount, 
payroll costs, gross assets and revenue.
**	
Of the total exceptional operating items in the year of £43.2m (see note 10), central items of £28.5m were not included in segmental exceptional operating items 
reviewed by the CODM.
***	 Excludes impairment losses of £1.1m charged to exceptional operating items. Of the total amortisation and impairment in the year, £59.0m has been charged to 
underlying operating profit as defined in note 9. 
****	 Excludes depreciation of £1.2m charged to exceptional operating items.
The Group’s largest customer accounts for 8.1% of revenue (£120.9m). Revenue from this customer arises across the Airframe 
Systems, Engine Systems and Services & Support segments. Revenue recognised in the current year relating to performance 
obligations satisfied or partially satisfied in the prior year was £3.6m.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
192

5. Segmental analysis continued
Year ended 31 December 2021: Analysis of additions to non-current assets
Airframe 
Systems 
£’m
Engine 
Systems
£’m
Energy & 
Equipment 
£’m
Services & 
Support
£’m
Total 
 
£’m
Development costs (see note 18)
15.9
3.9
7.5
0.3
27.6
Programme participation costs (see note 18)
1.4
–
–
–
1.4
Other purchased intangible assets*
0.1
0.7
0.1
1.6
2.5
Property, plant and equipment*
38.4
16.5
6.5
4.5
65.9
Total
55.8
21.1
14.1
6.4
97.4
*	
Relate to those non-current assets included within segmental trading assets reviewed by the CODM.
At 31 December 2021: Analysis of segmental trading assets
Total 
£’m
Airframe Systems
1,071.0
Engine Systems
384.0
Energy & Equipment
218.7
Services & Support
119.7
Total segmental trading assets
1,793.4
Centrally managed trading assets*
163.0
Goodwill (see note 17)
1,531.8
Other intangible assets excluding software assets
250.7
Investments (see note 21)
18.7
Derivative financial instruments – non-current (see note 33)
10.0
Derivative financial instruments – current (see note 33)
4.8
Current tax recoverable
8.1
Cash and cash equivalents (see note 26)
190.8
Total assets
3,971.3
*	
Centrally managed trading assets principally include amounts recoverable from insurers and other third parties in respect of environmental issues relating to 
former sites, other receivables and property, plant and equipment of central companies, including the Group’s Ansty Park facility. 
Analysis by geography
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
UK
110.0
129.7
Europe
255.0
270.8
United States of America
911.9
1,027.6
Rest of World
212.3
256.0
Revenue 
1,489.2
1,684.1
Revenue is based on the location of the customer.
 
 2021
£’m
2020
£’m
UK
610.2
617.6
Europe
166.5
184.0
United States of America
2,051.3
2,094.3
Rest of World
32.7
34.1
Non-current assets 
2,860.7
2,930.0
Segmental non-current assets are based on the location of the assets. They exclude investments, other receivables, contract 
assets and derivative financial instruments.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
193
Financial Statements

5. Segmental analysis continued
Analysis by operating segment – prior year
Year ended 31 December 2020 (restated): Analysis of income statement items
The key performance measure reviewed by the CODM is underlying operating profit. A detailed reconciliation of operating 
profit to underlying operating profit is provided in note 9. Prior year figures have been restated to reflect the transfer of a 
number of product lines from the Energy & Equipment division to the Engine Systems division with effect from 1 January 2021. 
The restatement comprised external revenue of £19.7m and underlying operating profit of £3.0m. In addition, gross segment 
revenue and inter-segment revenue have both been reduced by £58.2m.
 
Airframe 
Systems 
£’m
Engine 
Systems
£’m
Energy & 
Equipment 
£’m
Services & 
Support
£’m
Total 
 
£’m
Gross segment revenue
936.5
352.2
323.9
325.8
1,938.4
Inter-segment revenue
(143.4)
(98.9)
(8.6)
(3.4)
(254.3)
Revenue from external customers
793.1
253.3
315.3
322.4
1,684.1
At a point in time
754.2
239.6
141.5
315.2
1,450.5
Over time: Power by the hour/cost per brake landing
22.2
4.4
–
7.2
33.8
Over time: Other
16.7
9.3
173.8
–
199.8
Revenue from external customers by basis of recognition
793.1
253.3
315.3
322.4
1,684.1
Civil OE
207.8
98.2
–
–
306.0
Civil aftermarket
176.7
4.0
–
238.9
419.6
Defence
377.7
128.8
179.4
82.5
768.4
Energy
13.9
2.2
114.4
0.6
131.1
Other
17.0
20.1
21.5
0.4
59.0
Revenue from external customers by end market
793.1
253.3
315.3
322.4
1,684.1
Underlying operating profit/(loss) (see note 9)*
120.5
(16.2)
45.4
40.8
190.5
Items not affecting underlying operating profit (see note 9)
(487.8)
Operating loss (see note 9)
(297.3)
Finance income (see note 11)
0.5
Finance costs (see note 12)
(37.2)
Net finance costs
(36.7)
Loss before tax
(334.0)
Tax credit (see note 13)
19.8
Loss for the year
(314.2)
Impairment losses on goodwill and other intangible assets (see notes 17
and 18)**
145.5
201.1
14.7
–
361.3
Other exceptional operating items***
27.3
22.3
4.0
3.4
57.0
Amortisation of intangible assets (see notes 18 and 19)****
104.6
24.5
9.7
1.8
140.6
Depreciation (see note 20)
28.6
16.6
8.3
3.2
56.7
*	
Central costs are allocated using a variety of bases designed to reflect the beneficial relationship between costs and segments. Bases include headcount,  
payroll costs, gross assets and revenue.
** 	 Of the total impairment losses in the year, £1.1m relating to Engine Systems has been charged to underlying operating profit as defined in note 9, with the balance 
of £360.2m charged to exceptional operating items (see note 10).
***	 Comprises exceptional operating items other than those relating to impairment losses on goodwill and development costs. Of the total exceptional operating 
items in the year of £428.7m (see note 10), central items of £11.5m were not included in segmental exceptional operating items reviewed by the CODM.
****	 Of the total amortisation in the year, £52.4m has been charged to underlying operating profit as defined in note 9.
The Group’s largest customer accounts for 8.9% of revenue (£149.5m). Revenue from this customer arises across all segments. 
Revenue recognised in the current year relating to performance obligations satisfied or partially satisfied in the prior year was £3.2m.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
194

5. Segmental analysis continued
Year ended 31 December 2020 (restated): Analysis of additions to non-current assets*
 
Airframe 
Systems 
£’m
Engine 
Systems
£’m
Energy & 
Equipment 
£’m
Services & 
Support
£’m
Total 
 
£’m
Development costs (see note 18)
28.4
3.1
9.7
0.2
41.4
Programme participation costs (see note 18)
2.6
–
–
–
2.6
Other purchased intangible assets**
0.7
0.3
0.6
0.9
2.5
Property, plant and equipment**
36.9
23.6
6.1
3.5
70.1
Total
68.6
27.0
16.4
4.6
116.6
*	
Prior year figures have been restated to reflect the transfer of a number of product lines from the Energy & Equipment division to the Engine Systems division with 
effect from 1 January 2021. The restatement comprised additions to non-current assets of £10.2m.
**	
Relates to those non-current assets included within segmental trading assets reviewed by the CODM.
At 31 December 2020 (restated): Analysis of segmental trading assets*
Total 
£’m
Airframe Systems
1,036.5
Engine Systems
390.1
Energy & Equipment
200.4
Services & Support
90.4
Total segmental trading assets
1,717.4
Centrally managed trading assets**
167.4
Goodwill (see note 17)
1,519.5
Other intangible assets excluding software assets
328.6
Investments (see note 21)
20.8
Derivative financial instruments – non-current (see note 33)
15.0
Deferred tax assets (see note 35)
19.2
Derivative financial instruments – current (see note 33)
5.4
Current tax recoverable
11.5
Cash and cash equivalents (see note 26)
178.6
Assets classified as held for sale (see note 22)
14.7
Total assets
3,998.1
*	
Prior year figures have been restated to reflect the transfer of a number of product lines from the Energy & Equipment division to the Engine Systems division with 
effect from 1 January 2021. The restatement comprised segmental trading assets of £33.9m.
** 	 Centrally managed trading assets principally include amounts recoverable from insurers and other third parties in respect of environmental issues relating to 
former sites, other receivables and property, plant and equipment of central companies, including the Group’s Ansty Park facility. 
6. Auditors’ remuneration
Payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its associates:
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
For the audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements in respect of the current year
2.2
2.2
For the audit of the accounts of any subsidiary of the Company in respect of the current year
0.7
0.6
Auditors’ remuneration
2.9
2.8
Non-audit fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were £0.1m (2020: £0.1m), consisting of other assurance services.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
195
Financial Statements

Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
7. Operating profit/(loss)
Operating profit/(loss) is stated after charging/(crediting):
2021
£’m
2020
 (restated)*
£’m
Raw materials and consumables used
443.8
457.1
Employee costs (see note 8)
568.2
659.3
Site related costs**
109.7
118.3
Change in inventories of finished goods and work in progress
(20.9)
38.5
Capitalisation of development costs (see note 18)
(27.6)
(41.4)
Free of charge/deeply discounted manufactured parts
49.2
53.4
Amortisation and impairment of capitalised development costs (see note 18)***
35.6
32.6
Amortisation of programme participation costs (see note 18)
1.2
1.2
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired in business combinations (see note 9)
80.1
88.2
Amortisation and impairment of software and other intangible assets (see note 19)
22.2
19.7
Depreciation (see note 20)***
54.7
52.9
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
–
1.4
Exceptional operating items (see note 10)
43.2
428.7
Financial instruments – loss (see note 9)
–
2.9
Net foreign exchange loss
5.4
8.1
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses (see note 9)****
3.3
–
Share of loss after tax of joint ventures (see note 21)
0.4
3.2
Other costs*****
84.0
94.8
Total
1,452.5
2,018.9
*	
Prior year figures have been restated on a comparable basis to 2021. As a result, prior year figures for raw materials and consumables used has reduced by £10.9m, 
amortisation and impairment of capitalised development costs has increased by £1.1m, depreciation has reduced by £3.8m, net foreign exchange losses has 
increased by £8.1m and other costs has increased by £5.5m.
**	
Site related costs comprise business insurance, energy, establishment and other factory costs. 
***	
Excludes amounts recorded as exceptional operating items.
****	 Excludes £4.0m of costs related to the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation which are included within employee costs.
*****	Other costs principally comprise engineering materials of £22.4m (2020: £16.8m), freight costs of £20.5m (2020: £22.8m) and professional fees of £32.4m (2020: £27.7m).
Disclosed as:
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Cost of sales
1,016.8
1,200.6
Operating costs
435.7
818.3
Total
1,452.5
2,018.9
Total research and development expenditure in the year is £70.7m (2020: £97.9m) of which £14.5m (2020: £20.8m) is charged to cost 
of sales or manufacturing work in progress, £28.6m (2020: £35.7m) is charged to net operating costs and £27.6m (2020: £41.4m) is 
capitalised as development costs (see note 18).
Operating profit/(loss) is stated after crediting:
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
5.3
–
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses (see note 9)
–
32.0
Financial instruments – gain (see note 9)
16.7
–
Other income
4.7
5.5
Operating income
26.7
37.5
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
196

8. Employee information

2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Wages and salaries
460.0
530.2
Social security costs
42.8
53.0
Retirement benefit costs (see note 36)
25.1
35.2
Share-based payment expense/(credit) (see note 38)
5.5
(2.5)
Other benefits including US medical costs
34.8
43.4
Employee costs including Executive Directors
568.2
659.3
2021
Average
Monthly
Number
2020
Average
Monthly
Number
Airframe Systems
4,793
5,324
Engine Systems*
1,773
2,013
Energy & Equipment* 
1,133
1,479
Services & Support
520
543
Corporate including shared services**
705
510
Total persons employed including Executive Directors
8,924
9,869
Other persons providing similar services
261
651
Total 
9,185
10,520
*	
A number of product lines from the Energy & Equipment division were transferred to the Engine Systems division with effect from 1 January 2021. If this transfer was 
reflected in 2020, it would result in an increase to Engine Systems average monthly headcount of 141, with a corresponding decrease to Energy & Equipment.
**	
Corporate headcount has increased as a result of further centralisation of activity previously performed at a divisional level.
9. Reconciliations between profit and underlying profit

Underlying profit is used by the Board to monitor and measure the underlying trading performance of the Group. Items excluded 
from underlying profit measures are treated consistently with the way performance is measured under the Group’s short-term and 
long-term incentive plans and with covenant requirements defined in the Group’s committed credit facilities.
 
Notes
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Operating profit/(loss)
63.4
(297.3)
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses
a
7.3
(32.0)
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired in business combinations
b
80.1
88.2
Financial instruments – (gain)/loss
c
(16.7)
2.9
Exceptional operating items (see note 10) 
43.2
428.7
Adjustments to operating profit/(loss)*
 
113.9
487.8
Underlying operating profit
 
177.3
190.5
Profit/(loss) before tax
31.3
(334.0)
Adjustments to operating profit/(loss) per above
113.9
487.8
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations (see note 36)**
 
4.1
5.7
Adjustments to profit/(loss) before tax
 
118.0
493.5
Underlying profit before tax
 
149.3
159.5
Profit/(loss) for the year
31.2
(314.2)
Adjustments to profit/(loss) before tax per above
118.0
493.5
Tax effect of adjustments to profit before tax***
(28.7)
(51.2)
Adjustments to profit/(loss) for the year
 
89.3
442.3
Underlying profit for the year
 
120.5
128.1
*	
Of the adjustments to operating profit/(loss), £9.2m (2020: £39.0m) relating to exceptional operating items has been charged to cost of sales, with the balance of 
£104.7m (2020: £448.8m) included within net operating costs.
**	
The Board considers net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations to be a non-trading item and accordingly excludes it from underlying profit measures.
***	 Of the tax effect of adjustments to profit/(loss) before tax, £10.4m (2020: £32.5m) relates to exceptional operating items (see note 10).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
197
Financial Statements

9. Reconciliations between profit and underlying profit continued
a.	 Delivery of the Group’s strategy includes investment in acquisitions that enhance its technology portfolio. The exclusion of 
significant items arising from M&A activity is designed by the Board to align short-term operational decisions with this longer-
term strategy. Accordingly amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses are excluded from underlying 
profit measures. These include gains or losses made on the disposal or closure of businesses, adjustments to the fair value of 
contingent consideration payable in respect of acquired businesses or receivable in respect of disposed businesses and costs 
directly attributable to the acquisition and disposal of businesses. Additionally in 2021, it includes amounts incurred in respect 
of the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation.
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Loss/(gain) on disposal of businesses before disposal expenses 
0.6
(37.1)
Costs related to disposal of businesses in the current year (see note 44)
1.8
3.8
Loss/(gain) on disposal of businesses in the current year (see note 44)
2.4
(33.3)
Costs related to the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation
5.1
–
Amounts recognised in respect of disposals in prior years
(0.2)
1.3
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses
7.3
(32.0)
b.	 For the same reasons as described in note 9a, the Group also excludes from its underlying profit figures the amortisation of 
intangible assets acquired in business combinations.
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Amortisation of other intangible assets (see note 19)
100.3
107.9
Less: amortisation of software and other intangible assets (see note 19)
(20.2)
(19.7)
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired in business combinations
80.1
88.2
c.	 To ensure appropriate and timely commercial decisions are made as to when and how to mitigate the Group’s foreign currency 
and interest rate exposures, gains and losses arising from the marking to market of financial instruments that are not hedge 
accounted are excluded from underlying profit measures. The Group does not hedge account for foreign currency forward 
contracts, cross-currency derivatives or treasury lock derivatives (see note 33 for further details).
	
When interest rate derivatives qualify to be hedge accounted, any difference recognised in the income statement as hedge 
ineffectiveness between movements in fair value of the derivatives and fair value of fixed rate borrowings is excluded from 
underlying profit measures. 
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Movement in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts
10.0
(15.9)
Impact of retranslating net foreign currency assets and liabilities at spot rate
(1.8)
6.5
Movement in fair value of interest rate derivatives
3.4
1.6
Movement in fair value of fixed rate borrowings due to interest rate risk (see note 32)
(3.3)
(1.6)
Movement in fair value of cross-currency derivatives
(24.5)
12.8
Movement in fair value of treasury lock derivative
(0.5)
(0.5)
Financial instruments – (gain)/loss
(16.7)
2.9
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
198

10. Exceptional operating items
Delivery of the Group’s strategy includes the restructuring of its cost base to deliver operational improvements. The exclusion 
from underlying profit measures of significant items arising from site consolidations, business restructuring and integration of 
acquired businesses is designed by the Board to align short-term operational decisions with this longer-term strategy. In 2021, 
given their significance and that they relate to historical environmental matters in respect of businesses disposed of by Whittaker 
Corporation prior to its acquisition by the Group in 1999, costs recognised have been treated as operating exceptional items. 
In 2020, the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting uncertainty facing the commercial aerospace industry, 
gave rise to significant non-recurring impairment losses and asset write-downs which were treated as exceptional operating items. 
 
Note
Income statement
Cash flow
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
(Reversals)/impairment losses and other asset write-downs
a
(3.8)
374.2
–
–
COVID-19 incremental non-recurring costs net of income
 b
3.8
22.0
3.3
18.9
Site consolidations
c
14.7
33.5
22.6
31.6
Environmental clean-up costs 
d
29.5
–
–
–
Business restructuring costs and other items
e
(1.0)
(1.0)
–
(1.2)
Exceptional operating items
43.2
428.7
25.9
49.3
a.	 In 2020, the Group recognised material impairment losses and other reductions in asset values arising from the uncertainty 
facing the commercial aerospace industry that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic as an exceptional operating item. 
Given their significance, they were presented separately on the face of the income statement as the Group considered it relevant 
to an understanding of the Group’s financial performance. In 2021, £3.8m of the impairment losses and other asset write-downs 
originally recognised in 2020 were reversed. Given the reversals were not significant, they have not been separately presented 
on the face of the income statement, but have been treated consistently with 2020 as an exceptional operating item. Of the 
amounts classified as exceptional operating items, a £2.4m credit has been recognised within cost of sales, with the remaining 
£1.4m credit recognised within other operating costs. The tax charge in respect of these items was £0.3m.
b.  The Group continues to exclude incremental income and expenditure directly attributable to the global COVID-19 pandemic, 
and which is not expected to recur in future years, from its underlying profit measures. In 2021, this principally relates to 
additional cleaning costs; the purchase of personal protective equipment; and shift premiums and other associated costs 
arising from social distancing measures. Of the amounts classified as exceptional operating items, £2.1m has been recognised 
within cost of sales, with the balance of £1.7m recognised within other operating costs. The tax credit in respect of these items 
was £0.7m.
c.  Amounts principally relate to costs incurred in respect of the Group’s previously announced plans to reduce its footprint by the 
end of 2021. This project was substantially complete at the end of 2021, but costs in respect of projects commenced in 2021 
will be incurred in subsequent years as these projects are completed. Cumulative costs since the announcement are £111.9m. 
In 2021, costs are principally in respect of the move to the new facility at Ansty Park in the West Midlands, UK which has enabled 
the Group to consolidate a range of manufacturing, engineering and support operations into a single centre of excellence. 
Of the amounts classified as exceptional operating items, £10.5m has been recognised within cost of sales with the balance of 
£4.2m recognised within other operating costs. The tax credit in respect of these items was £3.6m.
d.  During the year, the Group recognised a provision for £29.5m (2020: £nil) in respect of environmental matters relating to a 
former site operated by Whittaker Corporation, prior to its acquisition by the Group in 1999. See note 4 for further details. 
Amounts classified as exceptional operating items have been recognised within net operating costs. The tax credit in respect 
of this item was £6.8m.
e.  This principally relates to the reversal of amounts previously recognised as exceptional operating items. Amounts classified as 
exceptional operating items have been recognised within cost of sales. The tax charge in respect of these items was £0.4m.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
199
Financial Statements

11. Finance income
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Interest on bank deposits
–
0.1
Unwinding of interest on other receivables (see note 34)
0.2
0.2
Other finance income
0.3
0.2
Finance income
0.5
0.5
12.	Finance costs
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Interest on bank borrowings
0.6
1.3
Interest on senior notes 
21.4
24.5
Interest on lease liabilities
5.7
6.0
Unwinding of discount on provisions (see note 34)
0.6
0.7
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations (see note 36)
4.1
5.7
Amortisation of debt issue costs
1.5
0.8
Less: amounts capitalised in the cost of qualifying assets (see note 18)
(1.3)
(1.8)
Finance costs
32.6
37.2
13. Tax
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Current tax – current year
29.3
29.3
Current tax – adjustment in respect of prior years
(5.2)
(10.5)
Deferred tax – origination and reversal of temporary differences
(26.3)
(44.6)
Deferred tax – adjustment in respect of prior years
2.3
6.0
Tax charge/(credit)
0.1
(19.8)
The Finance Act 2021 introduced legislation to increase the main rate of corporation tax in the UK from 19% to 25% from 1 April 
2023. The legislation was substantively enacted in 2021 and has resulted in an additional current year tax charge of £5.7m, arising 
from the impact of the change in tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities.
Reconciliation of tax charge/(credit)
A reconciliation based on the weighted average tax rate applicable to the profit/(loss) of the Group’s consolidated businesses is 
as follows:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Profit/(loss) before tax at weighted average tax rate of 9.6%* (2020: 24.7%)
3.0
(82.4)
Effects of:
Impact of impairment losses on intangible assets
–
67.9
Deferred tax – effects of changes in other statutory tax rates
1.8
0.3
Tax effect of share-based payments
–
1.5
Non-taxable gain on disposal of businesses
(0.5)
(4.8)
Tax losses not recognised
(1.0)
0.5
Tax credits and incentives
(1.4)
(2.7)
Provision for/(release of) uncertain tax positions
(1.1)
1.3
Other permanent differences
2.2
3.1
Current tax – adjustment in respect of prior years
(5.2)
(10.5)
Deferred tax – adjustment in respect of prior years
2.3
6.0
Tax charge/(credit)
0.1
(19.8)
*	
Calculated as the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the Group’s businesses in their respective countries in the year. Accordingly it does not reflect 
any changes in tax rates that have been substantively enacted, but are not applicable until future years. The change in the weighted average applicable tax rate 
is caused by changes to the geographical balance of the Group’s profits and losses due to the impact of the exceptional operating items. The sensitivity of the 
tax charge to changes in the tax rate is such that a one percentage point increase, or reduction, in the tax rate would cause the total taxation charge for 2021 to 
increase, or reduce respectively, by approximately £4.3m of which £3.2m arises from the impact of the change in tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities.
The tax reconciliation for 2021 includes £1.4m (2020: £2.7m) in respect of tax credit and incentives in the US for items such as 
research and development and certain foreign derived income, and a release of £1.1m (2020: £1.3m charge) in respect of various 
uncertain tax positions in the Group (see note 29). 
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
200

13. Tax continued
Tax relating to components of other comprehensive income/(expense)
 
2021
2020
Before 
tax 
 
£’m
Tax  
(charge)/ 
credit 
£’m
After 
tax 
 
£’m
Before 
tax 
 
£’m
Tax  
(charge)/ 
credit 
£’m
After 
tax 
 
£’m
Current tax – currency translation movements
(6.9)
2.9
(4.0)
–
–
–
Current tax – movements in fair value of financial liabilities 
arising from changes in credit risk
(1.3)
0.3
(1.0)
–
–
–
Deferred tax – currency translation movements
–
–
–
(79.9)
2.0
(77.9)
Deferred tax – movements in fair value of financial liabilities 
arising from changes in credit risk
–
–
–
1.8
(0.4)
1.4
Deferred tax – remeasurement of retirement benefit 
obligations
115.4
(21.8)
93.6
(42.6)
10.8
(31.8)
Other comprehensive income/(expense)
107.2
(18.6)
88.6
(120.7)
12.4
(108.3)
Tax relating to items recognised directly in equity
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Current tax relating to share-based payment expense
1.4
(0.2)
Deferred tax relating to share-based payment expense (see note 35)
1.3
(2.0)
Total credit/(charge)
2.7
(2.2)
14. Earnings/(loss) per share 
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the Company by the weighted average 
number of shares in issue during the year. The weighted average number of shares excludes treasury shares and any shares 
bought by the Group and held during the year by an independently managed Employee Share Ownership Plan Trust (see note 39). 
The weighted average number of own shares excluded is 2.3m shares (2020: 3.6m shares). The calculation of diluted EPS adjusts 
the weighted average number of shares to reflect the assumption that all potentially dilutive ordinary shares convert. For the 
Group, this means assuming all share awards in issue are exercised. 
2021
2020
 
Profit*
£’m
Shares 
Number ’m
EPS 
Pence
Loss*
£’m
Shares 
Number ’m
EPS 
Pence
Basic EPS
31.2
780.2
4.0
(314.2)
777.8
(40.4)
Potential effect of dilutive ordinary shares
–
4.2
–
–
11.6
–
Diluted EPS
31.2
784.4
4.0
(314.2)
789.4
(40.4)
*	
Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to equity owners of the Company.
Underlying EPS is based on underlying profit for the year (see note 9) and the same number of shares used in the calculation of 
basic EPS. It is reconciled to basic EPS below:
 
2021
Pence
2020
Pence
Basic EPS
4.0
(40.4)
Adjust for effects of:
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses
0.6
(4.2)
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired in business combinations
8.0
9.2
Financial instruments – (gain)/loss
(1.8)
0.3
Exceptional operating items
4.2
51.0
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations
0.4
0.6
Underlying basic EPS
15.4
16.5
Diluted underlying EPS is based on underlying profit for the year (see note 9) and the same number of shares used in the 
calculation of diluted EPS. Diluted underlying EPS for the year is 15.4 pence (2020: 16.2 pence).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
201
Financial Statements

15. Dividends
The Directors did not recommend the payment of a dividend in respect of 2020. In line with the terms of the previously announced 
proposed transaction with Parker-Hannifin, the Group is not paying a final dividend for 2021.
16. Related party transactions
During the year, the Group made sales to the joint ventures of £0.4m (2020: £0.7m) and purchases from the joint ventures of £1.0m 
(2020: £0.6m). Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation. 
The remuneration of key management personnel of the Group, which is defined for 2021 as members of the Board and the Group 
Executive Committee, is set out below. 
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits
7.6
4.7
Share-based payment expense/(credit)
1.3
(0.5)
Total
8.9
4.2
Full details of all elements in the remuneration package of each Director, together with Directors’ share interests and share 
awards, are disclosed in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 126 to 155 which forms part of these consolidated 
financial statements.
17. Goodwill
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
At 1 January
1,519.5
1,966.6
Exchange rate adjustments
12.3
(22.9)
Businesses disposed 
–
(84.8)
Transferred to assets classified as held for sale
–
(3.7)
Impairment losses
–
(335.7)
At 31 December 
1,531.8
1,519.5
The net book amount at 31 December 2021 comprises cost of £1,856.5m (2020: £1,841.4m) and accumulated impairment losses of 
£324.7m (2020: £321.9m).
An analysis of goodwill by CGU or group of CGUs is shown below:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Airframe Systems
1,115.0
1,105.3
Engine Systems*
130.5
115.3
Services & Support
207.7
206.6
Defence Systems
30.6
30.2
Other*
48.0
62.1
Total
1,531.8
1,519.5
*	
As a result of the transfer of a number of product lines from the Energy & Equipment division to the Engine Systems division on 1 January 2021, the related goodwill 
of £13.9m has been reclassed from Other to the Engine Systems group of CGUs.
Impairment testing
Under the Group’s annual impairment testing cycle, goodwill is tested for impairment at 30 June each year. During 2021, the 
Group did not identify any trigger events indicating the carrying value of goodwill attributable to any of the Group’s CGUs was 
impaired and accordingly no additional impairment testing was performed.
No changes were made in 2021 to the level at which impairment testing was performed.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
202

17. Goodwill continued
Impairment testing continued 
For the purpose of impairment testing, the Group historically used value-in-use calculations to determine recoverable amounts 
as it had not considered there to be reliable estimates of fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCOD). However, following approval 
by the Group’s shareholders on 21 September 2021 of the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 
FVLCOD has been determined to be £6,200.0m based on the all-cash offer of 800 pence per share and estimated costs of 
disposal of £55.0m. This is higher than the Group’s calculation of its estimated value-in-use which, by restricting cash flows to a 
five-year period and capping growth in subsequent periods to long-term inflation estimates, does not fully capture the extent of 
the anticipated civil aerospace recovery. Accordingly, for the purposes of impairment testing recoverable value has been based 
on FVLCOD.
FVLCOD for each CGU has been estimated by allocating the FVLCOD of the Group using the relative value-in-use of each CGU. 
The key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations were as follows:
Cash flows covered by management estimates
Estimates of cash flows prepared and approved by management covering a five-year period from the date of the impairment 
testing were used. Cash flow estimates covering three potential scenarios were prepared and probability weighted to derive an 
expected value for the cash flows to be used. The scenarios modelled reflected a range of assumptions as to the extent and pace 
of recovery in the civil aerospace sector in particular, although the impacts on other markets of the economic uncertainty arising 
from COVID-19 were also considered, together with different assumptions on the level of gross margin improvement over the five-
year period.
Growth rates used for periods beyond those covered by management’s detailed budgets and plans
The Group’s assumptions reflected a number of different inputs: its own estimates taking into account the long-term nature of the 
industry in which the CGUs operate and their sole source positions; industry estimates where available; and the impacts of climate 
change and other potential structural changes in markets. These different assumptions were probability weighted to derive an 
expected growth rate and the lower of this value and the long-term inflation forecasts for the countries in which the CGUs operate 
was used. The growth rates used were as follows:
 
2021 
%
2020 
%
Airframe Systems
2.2
2.0
Engine Systems
1.7
1.3
Services & Support
2.2
2.1
Defence Systems
2.3
2.2
Other
1.1-2.3
0.7-2.2
Discount rates applied to future cash flows 
The Group’s post-tax weighted average cost of capital (WACC) was used as the foundation for determining the discount rates 
to be applied. The WACC was adjusted to a pre-tax rate and to reflect risks specific to the CGU or group of CGUs not already 
reflected in its future cash flows. The pre-tax discount rates used were as follows:
 
2021 
%
2020 
%
Airframe Systems
9.9
10.7
Engine Systems
8.5
9.1
Services & Support
9.5
10.4
Defence Systems
9.9
10.6
Other
7.3-10.2
8.1-11.0
As a result of the impairment test, no impairment of any CGU or group of CGUs was identified. With the exception of Airframe 
Systems, headroom measured in percentage terms for each of the CGUs and groups of CGUs was greater than 100% of the 
carrying value of the CGU’s assets, including goodwill. For Airframe Systems, headroom was £1,474.0m (71% of the carrying 
value of the CGU’s assets, including goodwill). Having modelled a number of sensitivities, it was concluded that no reasonably 
foreseeable change in key assumptions used in the impairment model would result in a significant impairment charge being 
recognised in the consolidated financial statements.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
203
Financial Statements

18. Development costs and programme participation costs
 
Development 
costs 
 
£’m
Programme 
participation 
costs 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
Cost
814.4
38.4
Accumulated amortisation
(238.5)
(20.4)
Net book amount
575.9
18.0
Year ended 31 December 2020
Opening net book amount
575.9
18.0
Exchange rate adjustments
(7.6)
(0.7)
Additions – Internal development costs
41.4
–
– Cash payments
–
2.6
Transfers to contract assets
(1.8)
–
Disposals
(1.0)
–
Interest capitalised (see note 12)
1.8
–
Businesses disposed
(19.7)
–
Impairment losses*
(25.6)
–
Amortisation – net operating costs
(31.5)
(1.2)
Net book amount
531.9
18.7
At 1 January 2021
Cost
800.0
39.6
Accumulated amortisation
(268.1)
(20.9)
Net book amount
531.9
18.7
Year ended 31 December 2021
Opening net book amount
531.9
18.7
Exchange rate adjustments
3.1
0.2
Additions – Internal development costs
27.6
–
– Cash payments
–
1.4
Transfers to contract assets
(2.5)
(0.1)
Interest capitalised (see note 12)
1.3
–
Impairment losses*
(3.7)
–
Amortisation – net operating costs
(33.0)
(1.2)
Net book amount
524.7
19.0
At 31 December 2021
Cost
824.6
44.9
Accumulated amortisation 
(299.9)
(25.9)
Net book amount
524.7
19.0
*	
Of the impairment losses, £1.1m (2020: £24.5m) has been charged to operating exceptional items (see note 10). 
The net book amount of development costs includes £419.3m (2020: £423.3m) in respect of Airframe Systems which have an 
estimated weighted average remaining life of 12.7 years (2020: 12.7 years). Interest has been capitalised using the average rate 
payable on the Group’s floating rate borrowings of 0.9% (2020: 1.2%). Tax relief claimed on interest capitalised in the year is  
£0.3m (2020: £0.3m). 
The Group has individually material balances capitalised on the Airbus A220, Airbus A321NEO, Bombardier Global 7500/8000, 
Embraer 450/500, Irkut MC-21, Gulfstream G500/G600, LEAP-X, Dassault Falcon 6X, Boeing 787 and Boeing 737 programmes. 
These programmes have an aggregate net book amount of £333.4m (at 31 December 2020 these programmes had an aggregate 
net book amount of £331.8m). Of this net book amount, £67.6m (2020: £59.0m) relates to aircraft programmes not yet in service. 
In note 4, the Group discloses a critical accounting estimate in respect of the MC-21 programme. In respect of the other 
programmes with individually material capitalised balances, the Group does not believe there is a significant risk of an OEM 
bankruptcy, programme cancellation or other event in the next 12 months which would give rise to material loss in 2022.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
204

19. Other intangible assets
Acquired in business combinations*
 
Customer  
relationships 
 
£’m
Technology 
 
 
£’m
Trade 
names and 
trademarks 
 £’m
Software  
and other 
assets 
£’m
Total 
 
 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
Cost
1,099.9
321.8
30.0
202.4
1,654.1
Accumulated amortisation 
(754.5)
(245.6)
(27.6)
(122.8)
(1,150.5)
Net book amount 
345.4
76.2
2.4
79.6
503.6
Year ended 31 December 2020
Opening net book amount
345.4
76.2
2.4
79.6
503.6
Exchange rate adjustments
(6.1)
(1.1)
–
(0.1)
(7.3)
Businesses disposed
–
–
–
(0.1)
(0.1)
Additions
–
–
–
13.2
13.2
Disposals
–
–
–
(0.4)
(0.4)
Amortisation – net operating costs
(67.0)
(20.5)
(0.7)
(19.7)
(107.9)
Net book amount
272.3
54.6
1.7
72.5
401.1
At 1 January 2021
Cost
1,056.9
282.5
21.7
212.2
1,573.3
Accumulated amortisation 
(784.6)
(227.9)
(20.0)
(139.7)
(1,172.2)
Net book amount 
272.3
54.6
1.7
72.5
401.1
Year ended 31 December 2021
Opening net book amount
272.3
54.6
1.7
72.5
401.1
Exchange rate adjustments
1.8
0.4
 –
  –
2.2
Additions
 –
 –
 –
9.5
9.5
Disposals
 –
 –
 –
(3.9)
(3.9)
Impairment losses – net operating costs 
–
–
–
(2.0)
(2.0)
Amortisation – net operating costs
(63.6)
(15.8)
(0.7)
(20.2)
(100.3)
Net book amount
210.5
39.2
1.0
55.9
306.6
At 31 December 2021
Cost
1,067.2
284.6
21.7
217.2
1,590.7
Accumulated amortisation 
(856.7)
(245.4)
(20.7)
(161.3)
(1,284.1)
Net book amount
210.5
39.2
1.0
55.9
306.6
*	
Amortisation of these items is excluded from the Group’s underlying profit figures (see note 9).
The net book amount of customer relationships includes £129.8m (2020: £182.8m) in respect of Airframe Systems and £70.6m 
(2020: £77.3m) in respect of Engine Systems. These have estimated weighted average remaining lives of 3.6 years (2020: 4.3 years) 
and 11.2 years (2020: 12.0 years), respectively. 
The net book amount of technology includes £20.0m (2020: £32.0m) in respect of Airframe Systems and £18.0m (2020: £20.6m) 
in respect of Engine Systems. These have estimated weighted average remaining lives of 2.7 years (2020: 3.3 years) and 6.7 years 
(2020: 7.7 years), respectively.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
205
Financial Statements

20. Property, plant and equipment
 
Land and 
buildings
 
 
£’m
Plant, 
equipment 
and 
vehicles 
£’m
Right-of-use 
assets: 
property
 
£’m
Right-of-use 
assets: 
other
 
£’m
Total
 
 
 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
Cost
221.7
570.3
203.8
4.6
1,000.4
Accumulated depreciation 
(95.6)
(363.0)
(90.3)
(2.1)
(551.0)
Net book amount 
126.1
207.3
113.5
2.5
449.4
Year ended 31 December 2020
Opening net book amount
126.1
207.3
113.5
2.5
449.4
Exchange rate adjustments
(1.7)
(3.4)
(1.6)
(0.1)
(6.8)
Businesses disposed
(0.4)
(2.4)
(4.0)
–
(6.8)
Additions
30.8
40.8
10.4
1.0
83.0
Transfer to assets classified as held for sale
–
(0.8)
(0.9)
–
(1.7)
Disposals
(0.2)
(1.2)
–
(0.2)
(1.6)
Transfers
1.9
(1.9)
–
–
–
Depreciation*
(8.3)
(32.4)
(14.8)
(1.2)
(56.7)
Net book amount
148.2
206.0
102.6
2.0
458.8
At 1 January 2021
Cost
233.2
567.5
188.2
5.0
993.9
Accumulated depreciation 
(85.0)
(361.5)
(85.6)
(3.0)
(535.1)
Net book amount 
148.2
206.0
102.6
2.0
458.8
Year ended 31 December 2021
Opening net book amount
148.2
206.0
102.6
2.0
458.8
Exchange rate adjustments
0.2
1.2
0.5
 –
1.9
Businesses disposed (see note 44)
 –
(0.3)
(0.2)
 –
(0.5)
Additions
25.8
35.1
25.8
0.8
87.5
Transfer from inventory**
 –
6.4
 –
 –
6.4
Disposals
(17.7)
(1.6)
(0.2)
(0.1)
(19.6)
Transfers
2.4
(2.4)
 –
 –
 –
Depreciation*
(11.2)
(30.3)
(13.5)
(0.9)
(55.9)
Net book amount
147.7
214.1
115.0
1.8
478.6
At 31 December 2021
Cost
235.1
592.5
209.7
5.0
1,042.3
Accumulated depreciation 
(87.4)
(378.4)
(94.7)
(3.2)
(563.7)
Net book amount***
147.7
214.1
115.0
1.8
478.6
*	
The depreciation charge includes £1.2m which has been charged to exceptional operating items (2020: £3.8m).
**	
Arises from the reclassification of amounts relating to rotable asset pools, which are used by the Group to improve turnaround times in relation to 
aftermarket services. 
*** 	Included within the net book amount are assets under construction of £12.6m (2020: £9.2m) relating to land and buildings and £42.1m (2020: £26.9m) relating to 
plant, equipment and vehicles. 
The Group received £7.4m (2020: £2.1m) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act from the US 
Department of Defense to sustain critical industrial base capability for military grade fuel bladders at its Rockmart facility in 
the US. These amounts have been recognised in property, plant and equipment as a reduction in the cost of the related capital 
expenditure additions in the year.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
206

21. Investments 
The Group’s investments in its joint ventures, Meggitt UTC Aerospace Systems, LLC (UTC Aero) and HiETA Technologies Limited 
(HiETA) are accounted for using the equity method and are stated as follows:
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
At 1 January
20.8
14.1
Exchange rate adjustments
0.2
(0.5)
Additions
–
10.4
Adjustment to contingent consideration*
(1.9)
–
Share of loss after tax
(0.4)
(3.2)
At 31 December
18.7
20.8
*	
During 2021, £0.9m in contingent consideration relating to HiETA was paid. The remaining contingent consideration payable of £1.9m was reassessed and 
determined to no longer be required and was therefore adjusted against the investment value.
Summarised financial information for the joint ventures
The information below reflects amounts presented in the financial statements of the joint ventures adjusted to reflect the Group’s 
accounting policies (and not the Group’s share of those amounts unless otherwise stated).
Summarised statement of comprehensive income
2021
2020
 
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
Revenue
12.6
2.4
15.0
10.6
2.4
13.0
Operating profit/(loss)
0.9
(2.3)
(1.4)
(2.9)
(3.1)
(6.0)
Finance costs
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0.4)
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0.4)
Profit/(loss) before tax
0.7
(2.5)
(1.8)
(3.1)
(3.3)
(6.4)
Tax charge
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
Profit/(loss) after tax
0.6
(2.5)
(1.9)
(3.2)
(3.3)
(6.5)
Total comprehensive income/(expense)
0.6
(2.5)
(1.9)
(3.1)
(3.3)
(6.4)
Summarised balance sheet
2021
2020
 
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
Property, plant and equipment
2.5
1.1
3.6
2.8
2.8
5.6
Cash and cash equivalents
2.7
0.2
2.9
4.3
0.3
4.6
Other current assets
6.8
0.3
7.1
7.3
0.6
7.9
Total assets
12.0
1.6
13.6
14.4
3.7
18.1
Financial liabilities (excluding trade payables)
(4.0)
(5.5)
(9.5)
(4.1)
(6.6)
(10.7)
Other liabilities
(5.8)
(1.6)
(7.4)
(8.7)
(1.0)
(9.7)
Total liabilities
(9.8)
(7.1)
(16.9)
(12.8)
(7.6)
(20.4)
Net assets/(liabilities)
2.2
(5.5)
(3.3)
1.6
(3.9)
(2.3)
Reconciliation of summarised financial information
2021
2020
 
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
UTC Aero
£’m
HiETA
£’m
Total
£’m
Net assets/(liabilities) at 1 January
1.6
(3.9)
(2.3)
4.7
(0.6)
4.1
Total comprehensive income/(expense)
0.6
(2.5)
(1.9)
(3.1)
(3.3)
(6.4)
Adjustment to equity*
–
0.9
0.9
–
–
–
Net assets/(liabilities) at 31 December
2.2
(5.5)
(3.3)
1.6
(3.9)
(2.3)
Group’s interest in joint venture
1.5
(1.8)
(0.3)
1.1
(1.3)
(0.2)
Goodwill
10.6
8.4
19.0
10.4
10.6
21.0
Group’s investment at 31 December
12.1
6.6
18.7
11.5
9.3
20.8
*	
Resulting from payment by the Group of contingent consideration relating to the acquisition of HiETA. 
There are no contingent liabilities relating to the Group’s interest in the joint ventures.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
207
Financial Statements

22. Assets classified as held for sale
On 30 January 2021, the Group completed the disposal of the Group’s aircraft ducting business, based in Dunstable UK, together 
with a small product line from one of the Group’s other businesses, previously classified as held for sale (see note 44). 
 
Assets 
classified as 
held for sale
 
£’m
Liabilities 
directly 
associated 
with assets 
classified as 
held for sale
£’m
Total
 
£’m
At 1 January 2021
14.7
(3.7)
11.0
Change in carrying value up to date of disposal
0.6
0.1
0.7
Business disposed (see note 44)
(15.3)
3.6
(11.7)
At 31 December 2021
–
–
–
23. Inventories
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Raw materials and bought-in components
173.4
163.3
Manufacturing work in progress
183.5
160.3
Finished goods and goods for resale
98.5
103.3
Total
455.4
426.9
The cost of inventories recognised as an expense and included within cost of sales is £923.8m (2020: £1,080.9m). The cost of 
inventories recognised as an expense includes £9.1m (2020: £13.4m) in respect of write-downs of inventory to net realisable value. 
The cost of inventories recognised as an expense has been reduced by £4.1m (2020: £3.3m) in respect of the reversal of write-
downs of inventory to net realisable value made in previous years.
24. Trade and other receivables
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Trade receivables
248.0
198.8
Prepayments
14.5
12.5
Other receivables
32.0
39.8
Current portion
294.5
251.1
Other receivables
18.8
16.5
Non-current portion
18.8
16.5
Total
313.3
267.6
As at 31 December 2021, £4.9m was due from one of the joint ventures (2020: £7.9m) and is included within trade receivables. 
Other receivables include £15.0m (2020: £18.8m) in respect of amounts recoverable from insurers and other third parties, 
principally relating to businesses sold by Whittaker Corporation prior to its acquisition by the Group, of which £2.8m (2020: £5.0m) 
is shown as current (see note 34). 
The Group does not hold any collateral as security. Trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies:
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Sterling
39.1
46.1
US dollar
243.9
189.3
Euro
18.1
19.3
Other
12.2
12.9
Total
313.3
267.6
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
208

25. Contract assets
 
2021
£’m
2020 
£’m
Conditional rights to consideration on over time contracts
50.6
45.7
Programme participation cash payments
3.1
3.1
Current portion
53.7
48.8
Conditional rights to consideration on over time contracts
22.3
24.6
Programme participation cash payments
33.5
35.0
Non-current portion
55.8
59.6
Total
109.5
108.4
Amortisation of programme participation cash payments of £3.1m (2020: £3.1m) has been recognised as a reduction in revenue in 
the year. Cumulative catch-up adjustments to revenue recognised in a prior year, arising from changes in the current year in the 
measure of progress or contract price on contract assets were £1.6m (2020: £0.4m).
Contract assets are also subject to the impairment requirements of IFRS 9, however the identified impairment loss was 
not significant.
26. Cash and cash equivalents
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Cash at bank and on hand
190.8
178.6
Total
190.8
178.6
Cash and cash equivalents are subject to interest at floating rates. 
27. Trade and other payables 
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Trade payables
132.4
131.4
Social security and other taxes
12.4
10.7
Accrued expenses
64.3
58.5
Other payables
108.8
95.9
Current portion
317.9
296.5
Other payables
3.7
8.5
Non-current portion
3.7
8.5
Total
321.6
305.0
Other payables include £26.3m (2020: £23.5m) due to banks in respect of the Group’s supplier financing programme. No amounts 
due under the programme met the requirements to be classified as bank borrowings (2020: £Nil).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
209
Financial Statements

28. Contract liabilities
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Contributions received from customers during development phase of programmes
2.4
1.7
Cost per brake landing/power by the hour contracts
7.9
4.9
Other consideration received in advance of performance
52.4
44.2
Current portion
62.7
50.8
Contributions received from customers during development phase of programmes
44.9
45.1
Cost per brake landing/power by the hour contracts
4.1
5.2
Other consideration received in advance of performance
23.6
23.6
Non-current portion
72.6
73.9
Total
135.3
124.7
Revenue recognised in the year relating to amounts recognised as a contract liability at the beginning of the year was £31.0m 
(2020: £36.1m). Cumulative catch-up adjustments to revenue recognised in a prior year, arising from changes in the current year in 
the measure of progress or contract price on contract liabilities were £2.2m (2020: £0.7m).
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partly satisfied at 
31 December 2021 is £369.1m (2020 (restated): £387.2m). Of this aggregate amount, the Group expects to recognise £130.6m 
(2020 (restated): £174.0m) as revenue during 2022, with the balance recognised in more than one year but not more than five years. 
Prior year figures have been restated to incorporate the full contract life of a number of power by the hour contracts resulting 
in an increase in the aggregate amount of £178.6m and an increase in the amount expected to be recognised in 2021 of £12.6m. 
The Group has taken the practical expedients available in IFRS 15 not to include amounts relating to contracts which have an 
expected duration of less than 12 months when received, or amounts relating to contracts for which revenue is recognised using 
a method whereby the value to the customer corresponds to the right to invoice the customer. 
29. Current tax liabilities
 
Note
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
UK Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) regime
a
1.9
18.3
Other liabilities in respect of uncertain tax positions
b
29.6
30.8
Other current tax liabilities
2.7
7.8
Current tax liabilities
34.2
56.9
a.	 In April 2019, the European Commission announced its decision that state aid partially applies to one of the UK’s CFC 
exemptions that was utilised by the Group. This decision has been appealed by the UK Government and the Group has also 
lodged its own separate appeal. There are a number of uncertainties that remain to be resolved, including the results of the 
appeals processes and, should these be unsuccessful, the extent to which historical tax benefits received by the Group are 
deemed to have derived from financing activities performed in the UK rather than overseas. In making an assessment of the 
appropriate tax liability related to historical tax benefits received by the Group under the CFC regime, the Group has estimated 
that the most likely outcome is that the appeals will not be successful and accordingly a liability for the Group’s estimated 
exposure was held at 31 December 2020. 
	
On 17 December 2020, the Taxation (Post-transition Period) Act 2020 received Royal Assent which gave the UK tax authorities 
specific powers to recover amounts considered due from UK businesses. The Group received tax assessments during 2021 
from the UK authority in this regard of £16.9m, for which a liability was held at 31 December 2020. The £16.9m was paid by the 
Group in the year. Separately, the Group is in discussion with the UK tax authorities over the applicability of one of the UK’s 
CFC exemptions utilised by the Group under UK domestic law and while this issue largely overlaps with the State Aid benefit 
now repaid, a residual liability is held in this regard at 31 December 2021. The Group does not consider there to be a significant 
risk of a material adjustment to the residual liability recognised within the next 12 months. 
b.	 In determining the Group’s tax liabilities, it is also necessary to consider other transactions in key tax jurisdictions for which the 
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Group’s tax liabilities for these matters reflect a number of estimates where the 
amount of tax payable is either currently under audit by the tax authorities or relates to a period which has yet to be audited. 
These areas include the deductibility of interest on certain borrowings used to finance acquisitions made by the Group and the 
value at which goods and services are transferred between Group companies. The nature of the items, for which a liability is held, 
is such that the final outcome could vary from the amounts recognised once a final tax determination is made, although currently 
none of these exposures are considered individually material. To the extent the estimated final outcome differs from the tax that 
has been provided, adjustments will be made to the liabilities held in the year the determination is made. The Group does not 
consider there to be a significant risk of a material adjustment to the liabilities recognised within the next 12 months.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
210

30. Lease liabilities
The Group leases various factories, warehouses, offices, plant and equipment. The following amounts are included in the Group’s 
consolidated financial statements in respect of its leases:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Depreciation charge for right-of-use assets (see note 20)
14.4
16.0
Additions to right-of-use assets (see note 20)*
26.6
11.4
Net book amount of right-of-use assets (see note 20)
116.8
104.6
Interest on lease liabilities (see note 12)
5.7
6.0
Expense related to short-term leases and low-value assets
1.0
0.6
Net cash outflow for leases** 
20.6
17.9
*	
In 2021, this includes £6.8m relating to the sale and leaseback of the Group’s Engine Systems facility in North Hollywood, USA which has a lease term of 15 years and 
£8.3m relating to a ten-year lease extension of the Group’s Airframe Systems facility in Portland, USA.
**	
Comprises capital payments of £14.9m (2020: £15.4m) and interest payments of £5.7m (2020: £6.0m), less a reverse lease premium received of £Nil (2020: £3.5m) 
relating to the new Ansty Park site.
Analysis of lease liabilities
 
Present value  
of minimum  
lease payments
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
In one year or less
15.6
14.7
In more than one year but not more than five years
50.0
45.4
In more than five years
103.4
84.2
Present value of lease liabilities
169.0
144.3
Current portion
15.6
14.7
Non-current portion
153.4
129.6
31. Bank and other borrowings
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Bank loans
2.8
2.2
Other loans
102.5
8.3
Current portion
105.3
10.5
Bank loans
28.2
43.7
Other loans
667.8
753.1
Non-current portion
696.0
796.8
Total
801.3
807.3
Analysis of bank and other borrowings repayable:
In one year or less
105.3
10.5
In more than one year but not more than five years
695.8
577.4
In more than five years
0.2
219.4
Total
801.3
807.3
Analysis of bank and other borrowings:
Drawn under committed facilities
791.6
795.9
Drawn under uncommitted facilities
2.7
2.2
Less unamortised debt issue costs
(2.7)
(2.4)
Fair value adjustment to fixed rate borrowings
1.2
3.3
Interest accruals
8.5
8.3
Total
801.3
807.3
Debt issue costs are amortised over the period of the facility to which they relate. The Group has no secured borrowings. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
211
Financial Statements

31. Bank and other borrowings continued 
Committed facilities
The Group has the following committed facilities at notional value:
 
2021
2020
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
2010 Senior notes : USD125.0m
92.8
–
92.8
91.6
–
91.6
2016 Senior notes: USD600.0m
445.4
–
445.4
439.5
–
439.5
2020 Senior notes: USD300.0m
222.7
–
222.7
219.8
–
219.8
Syndicated credit facilities: USD410.0m (2020: USD 750.0m)
–
304.4
304.4
–
549.4
549.4
Bilateral facility: USD50.0m (2020: USD125.0m)
–
37.1
37.1
–
91.5
91.5
Bilateral facility: GBP50.0m (2020: GBP100.0m)
–
50.0
50.0
–
100.0
100.0
Bilateral facility: GBP30.0m (2020: GBP45.0m)
30.0
–
30.0
45.0
–
45.0
Other: EUR0.8m
0.7
–
0.7
–
–
–
Committed facilities
791.6
391.5
1,183.1
795.9
740.9
1,536.8
The Group issued USD400m of loan notes to private placement investors in 2010, of which USD125m remains outstanding. 
The outstanding notes carry an interest rate of 5.12% and are due for repayment in June 2022. These loan notes are in a fair value 
hedge relationship with the Group’s interest rate swaps.
The Group issued USD600m of loan notes to private placement investors in 2016. The notes comprise two tranches as follows: 
USD300m carry an interest rate of 3.31% and are due for repayment in July 2023; and USD300m carry an interest rate of 3.60% 
and are due for repayment in July 2026. These loan notes are designated as net investment hedges of the net assets of USD 
denominated subsidiaries.
The Group issued USD300m of loan notes to private placement investors in 2020. The notes comprise two tranches as follows: 
USD100m carry an interest rate of 2.78% and are due for repayment in November 2023; and USD200m carry an interest rate of 
3.00% and are due for repayment in November 2025. 
In November 2021, the Group secured a three-year USD410m syndicated multi-currency revolving credit facility maturing in 
November 2024, which replaced the previous USD750m facility. At 31 December 2021, the amounts drawn under the facility 
are £Nil (2020: £Nil). Borrowings under the new facility are subject to interest at floating rates which are linked to SONIA 
(GBP), EURibor (EUR) and USD LIBOR (USD), until such future date to be agreed between the Group and the banks when USD 
borrowings will be linked to SOFR.
During 2021, the Group amended the three committed term loan bilateral facility agreements with its relationship banks. 
They now comprise a USD50m facility with Bank of America, a GBP50m facility with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation 
and a GBP30m facility with Caixabank. The USD facility now matures in December 2023 and the two GBP facilities mature in 
January 2024. Borrowings under the USD and GBP facilities are subject to interest at floating rates which are linked to SOFR 
and SONIA respectively.
Committed facilities expire as follows:
 
2021
2020
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
In one year or less
92.8
–
92.8
–
128.2
128.2
In more than one year but not more than five years
698.6
391.5
1,090.1
576.1
612.7
1,188.8
In more than five years
0.2
–
0.2
219.8
–
219.8
Committed facilities
791.6
391.5
1,183.1
795.9
740.9
1,536.8
The Group also has various uncommitted facilities with its relationship banks. At 31 December 2021, £2.7m (2020: £2.2m) was 
drawn under these facilities.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
212

31. Bank and other borrowings continued
Interest rate exposure
After taking account of financial derivatives entered into by the Group that alter the interest basis of its financial liabilities, the 
interest rate exposure on bank and other borrowings is: 
At 31 December 2021:
Fixed rate borrowings
Floating
 
 
 
£’m
Fixed
 
 
 
 
£’m
Total
  
 
 
£’m
Weighted 
average 
interest 
rate 
 
%
Weighted 
average 
period 
for which 
rate is fixed 
Years
US dollar
93.0
452.4
545.4
Swiss franc
–
148.8
148.8
Euro
–
79.8
79.8
Sterling
30.0
–
30.0
Gross bank and other borrowings
123.0
681.0
804.0
2.9
3.1
Less: unamortised debt issue costs
(1.8)
(0.9)
(2.7)
Bank and other borrowings
121.2
680.1
801.3
At 31 December 2020:
Fixed rate borrowings
Floating
 
 
 
 
£’m
Fixed 
 
 
 
 
£’m
Total
  
 
 
 
£’m
Weighted 
average 
interest 
rate 
 
%
Weighted 
average 
period 
for which 
rate is fixed 
Years
US dollar*
(133.1)
672.9
539.8
Swiss franc
–
166.4
166.4
Euro
–
58.5
58.5
Sterling
45.0
–
45.0
Gross bank and other borrowings
(88.1)
897.8
809.7
2.4
3.1
Less: unamortised debt issue costs
(1.4)
(1.0)
(2.4)
Bank and other borrowings
(89.5)
896.8
807.3
*	
Part of the proceeds from the issue of USD300m senior notes at fixed interest rates in 2020, was used to reduce the level of gross USD borrowings held at floating 
rates. Prior to this reduction, the Group had entered cross-currency derivatives, which matured during 2021, and which converted USD floating rate borrowings 
into fixed rate borrowings denominated in Swiss francs and euros. At 31 December 2020, the notional amounts of these cross-currency swaps exceeded the gross 
value of USD floating rate borrowings and accordingly a negative value is reported in the table above for floating rate USD borrowings after taking account of these 
financial derivatives.
The weighted average interest rate reflects the relative impact of interest rates based on the principal amounts and the duration 
of borrowings.
Hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries
The Group manages risks in respect of net operating assets held in foreign currencies by holding foreign currency 
denominated loans. 
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Carrying value at 1 January
446.3
461.1
Loss/(gain) recognised in net finance costs due to movements in accrued interest and debt costs
0.3
(0.1)
Loss/(gain) recognised in other comprehensive income due to exchange rate movements
5.9
(14.7)
Carrying value at 31 December
452.5
446.3
Cumulative translation adjustments recognised in other comprehensive income in relation to continuing net investment hedge 
loans are a gain of £9.9m (2020: £15.8m gain). 
The Group also uses the notional principal from cross-currency swaps in its net investment hedge which resulted in a £14.1m loss 
recognised in other comprehensive income. 
Net investment hedges are considered effective unless the value of the hedging instrument exceeds the value of the hedged 
item. No ineffectiveness arose in either 2021 or 2020.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
213
Financial Statements

32. Financial instruments
At 31 December 2021:
Held at fair value
Held at amortised cost
Through 
profit 
& loss
 
£’m
Derivatives 
designated 
for 
hedging 
£’m
Assets
 
£’m
Liabilities
 
£’m
Total 
book 
value
 
£’m
Total 
fair 
value
 
£’m
Non-current:
Other receivables (see note 24)
–
–
18.8
–
18.8
18.8
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
10.0
–
–
–
10.0
10.0
Current:
Trade and other receivables*
–
–
280.0
–
280.0
280.0
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
3.1
1.7
–
–
4.8
4.8
Cash and cash equivalents (see note 26)
–
–
190.8
–
190.8
190.8
Financial assets
13.1
1.7
489.6
–
504.4
504.4
Current:
Trade and other payables**
–
–
–
(305.5)
(305.5)
(305.5)
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
(3.2)
–
–
–
(3.2)
(3.2)
Lease liabilities (see note 30)
–
–
–
(15.6)
(15.6)
(15.6)
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)***
–
–
–
(105.3)
(105.3)
(105.3)
Non-current:
Other payables (see note 27)
–
–
–
(3.7)
(3.7)
(3.7)
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
(1.3)
–
–
–
(1.3)
(1.3)
Lease liabilities (see note 30)
–
–
–
(153.4)
(153.4)
(153.4)
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)
–
–
–
(696.0)
(696.0)
(692.6)
Financial liabilities
(4.5)
–
–
(1,279.5)
(1,284.0)
(1,280.6)
Total 
8.6
1.7
489.6
(1,279.5)
(779.6)
(776.2)
*	
Excludes prepayments of £14.5m (see note 24).
**	
Excludes social security and other taxes of £12.4m (see note 27).
***	 Current bank and other borrowings includes loan notes with a carrying amount of £94.2m which are designated as in a fair value hedge relationship (see note 31). 
This carrying amount includes a fair value hedge adjustment of £1.2m.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
214

32. Financial instruments continued
At 31 December 2020:
Held at fair value
Held at amortised cost
Through 
profit 
& loss
 
£’m
Derivatives 
designated 
for 
hedging 
£’m
Assets
 
£’m
Liabilities
 
£’m
Total 
book 
value
 
£’m
Total 
fair 
value
 
£’m
Non-current:
Other receivables (see note 24)
–
–
16.5
–
16.5
16.5
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
9.9
5.1
–
–
15.0
15.0
Current:
Trade and other receivables*
–
–
238.6
–
238.6
238.6
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
5.4
–
–
–
5.4
5.4
Cash and cash equivalents (see note 26)
–
–
178.6
–
178.6
178.6
Financial assets
15.3
5.1
433.7
–
454.1
454.1
Current:
Trade and other payables**
–
–
–
(285.8)
(285.8)
(285.8)
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
(21.6)
–
–
–
(21.6)
(21.6)
Lease liabilities (see note 30)
–
–
–
(14.7)
(14.7)
(14.7)
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)
–
–
–
(10.5)
(10.5)
(10.5)
Non-current:
Other payables (see note 27)
–
–
–
(8.5)
(8.5)
(8.5)
Derivative financial instruments (see note 33)
(0.3)
–
–
–
(0.3)
(0.3)
Lease liabilities (see note 30)
–
–
–
(129.6)
(129.6)
(129.6)
Bank and other borrowings (see note 31)***
–
–
–
(796.8)
(796.8)
(813.1)
Financial liabilities
(21.9)
–
–
(1,245.9)
(1,267.8)
(1,284.1)
Total 
(6.6)
5.1
433.7
(1,245.9)
(813.7)
(830.0)
*	
Excludes prepayments of £12.5m (see note 24).
**	
Excludes social security and other taxes of £10.7m (see note 27).
***	 Non-current bank and other borrowings includes loan notes with a carrying amount of £95.0m which are designated as in a fair value hedge relationship (see note 
31). This carrying amount includes a fair value hedge adjustment of £3.3m.
Fair value measurement and hierarchy

For trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, trade and other payables and floating rate bank and other borrowings, 
fair values approximate to book values primarily due to the short maturity periods of these financial instruments. For trade and 
other receivables, allowances are made within their book value for credit risk. Lease liabilities are outside the scope of IFRS 7 
“Financial Instruments: Disclosures” with regards to fair value disclosures.
Derivative financial instruments measured at fair value, are classified as level 2 in the fair value measurement hierarchy, as they 
have been determined using significant inputs based on observable market data. The fair values of interest rate derivatives have 
been derived from forward interest rates based on yield curves observable at the balance sheet date and contractual interest 
rates. The fair values of foreign currency forward contracts have been derived from forward exchange rates observable at the 
balance sheet date and contractual forward rates. The fair values of cross-currency derivatives have been derived from forward 
interest rates based on yield curves observable at the balance sheet date, forward exchange rates observable at the balance sheet 
date and contractual interest and forward rates. Credit risk is not significant for these instruments.
The current and non-current elements of fixed rate bank and other borrowings measured at fair value, are classified as level 3 in 
the fair value measurement hierarchy, as they have been determined using significant inputs which are a mixture of those based on 
observable market data (interest rate risk) and those not based on observable market data (credit risk). The fair values attributable 
to interest rate risk have been derived from forward interest rates based on yield curves observable at the balance sheet date and 
contractual interest rates, with the credit risk margin kept constant. The fair values attributable to credit risk have been derived 
from quotes from lenders for borrowings of similar amounts and maturity periods. The same methods of valuation have been 
used to derive the fair values of the current and non-current elements of fixed rate bank and other borrowings which are held at 
amortised cost, but for which fair values are provided in the tables above.
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy in the year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
215
Financial Statements

32. Financial instruments continued
Impairment of financial assets
Trade receivables are stated after a loss allowance. Movements in the loss allowance during the year are as follows:
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
At 1 January
12.4
6.1
Exchange rate adjustments
0.1
(0.2)
Businesses disposed
–
(0.2)
Utilised
(1.4)
(1.1)
(Credit)/charge to income statement – net operating costs*
(0.3)
7.8
At 31 December
10.8
12.4
* 	
Includes £2.5m (2020: £5.4m charge) which has been credited to exceptional operating items (see note 10). This relates, in 2021, to a partial reversal of the additional 
credit loss allowances recognised as an exceptional operating item in 2020 as a result of the uncertainty facing the commercial aerospace industry and a number of 
airline operator bankruptcies subsequent to the COVID-19 outbreak. 
The loss allowance is determined by reference to the ageing of gross balances which at 31 December 2021 is as follows:
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Current
203.6
165.4
Up to 1 month past due
20.6
20.7
Up to 2 months past due
11.2
7.3
Up to 3 months past due
5.8
4.1
More than 3 months past due
17.6
13.7
Gross balances
258.8
211.2
Loss allowance
(10.8)
(12.4)
Total
248.0
198.8
Impairment of other financial assets
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the balance sheet date is the fair value of each class of financial asset reported above. 

Other receivables and cash and cash equivalents are also subject to the impairment requirements of IFRS 9, however the identified 
impairment loss was not significant. The credit quality of the financial institutions where cash and cash equivalents is held are 
as follows:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Moody’s rating:
Aa
81.5
176.1
A
107.7
2.2
Baa
1.6
0.3
Total (see note 26)
190.8
178.6
33. Derivative financial instruments
At 31 December 2021:
 
Contract or underlying 
principal amount
Fair value 
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Interest rate swaps – fair value hedges
92.8
–
1.7
–
Cross-currency swaps – not hedge accounted
–
(87.6)
–
(1.1)
Foreign currency forward contracts – not hedge accounted
89.6
(77.3)
3.1
(2.1)
Current portion
182.4
(164.9)
4.8
(3.2)
Cross-currency swaps – not hedge accounted
228.6
–
6.5
–
Foreign currency forward contracts – not hedge accounted
76.1
(50.6)
3.5
(1.3)
Non-current portion
304.7
(50.6)
10.0
(1.3)
Total
487.1
(215.5)
14.8
(4.5)
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
216

33. Derivative financial instruments continued
At 31 December 2020:
 
Contract or underlying 
principal amount
Fair value 
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Cross-currency swaps – not hedge accounted
–
(299.5)
–
(20.0)
Foreign currency forward contracts – not hedge accounted
182.6
(40.3)
5.4
(1.6)
Current portion
182.6
(339.8)
5.4
(21.6)
Interest rate swaps – fair value hedges
91.6
–
5.1
–
Foreign currency forward contracts – not hedge accounted
172.0
(85.7)
9.9
(0.3)
Non-current portion
263.6
(85.7)
15.0
(0.3)
Total
446.2
(425.5)
20.4
(21.9)
Credit quality of derivative financial assets
The credit quality of derivative financial assets is as follows:
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Moody’s rating:
Aa
9.0
8.1
A
5.8
12.3
Total
14.8
20.4
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the balance sheet date is the fair value of the derivative financial instruments.
Interest rate swaps
The Group currently holds fixed to floating interest rate swap contracts, denominated in US dollars, that have the economic effect 
of converting fixed rate US dollar borrowings into floating rate US dollar borrowings. To the extent they continue to meet the 
criteria for hedge accounting, the contracts are accounted for as fair value hedges. 
The total notional principal amount of outstanding interest rate swap contracts at 31 December 2021 is USD125m (2020: USD125m) 
which will expire in 2022. The weighted average floating rate payable on the swap contracts in 2021 was LIBOR +1.1% (2020: LIBOR 
+1.1%). As the critical terms of the interest rate swaps match the underlying hedged loan, there is an expectation that the value 
of the hedging instrument and the value of the hedged item will move in the opposite direction. The hedge ratio is therefore 
expected to be 1:1.
Any difference recognised in the income statement between movements in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the fixed 
rate borrowings is considered to be hedge ineffectiveness. The fair value hedge ineffectiveness recognised in the year was a 
£0.1m charge (2020: £Nil) (see note 9). Possible sources of ineffectiveness arise from changes in the credit risk of either party to the 
derivative contract and timing differences on cash flows between the derivative and hedged item. 
Cross-currency swaps
The cross-currency swap contracts are used to synthetically convert US dollar denominated floating borrowings into Swiss franc 
and euro denominated fixed borrowings to commercially hedge against Swiss franc and euro denominated assets of foreign 
subsidiaries. The contracts do not qualify to be hedge accounted. 
Foreign currency forward contracts 
Although the Group uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against foreign currency exposures, it has decided the 
costs of meeting the extensive documentation requirements to be able to apply hedge accounting under IFRS 9 “Financial 
Instruments” are not merited. Foreign currency forward contracts are analysed as follows:
2021
2020
 
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Fair value:
US dollar/sterling forward sales
6.4
(2.6)
12.7
(1.7)
Forward sales denominated in other currencies
0.3
(0.7)
2.6
(0.2)
Total
6.7
(3.3)
15.3
(1.9)
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
217
Financial Statements

34. Provisions
 
Provisions
Environmental
(a)
£’m
Onerous
contracts 
(b)
£’m
Warranty
costs
(c)
£’m
Other 
(d)
£’m
Total
£’m
Environmental 
receivables
(a)
£’m
At 1 January 2021
72.7
13.0
16.0
11.2
112.9
(18.8)
Exchange rate adjustments
1.3
0.1
(0.1)
(0.1)
1.2
(0.3)
Additional provisions* 
29.5
8.2
8.9
3.7
50.3
–
Unused amounts reversed*
(1.0)
(4.3)
(0.3)
(5.8)
(11.4)
1.0
Charge/(credit) to net finance costs (see notes 12 and
11 respectively)
0.6
–
–
–
0.6
(0.2)
Transfers from trade and other payables
–
1.2
–
1.6
2.8
–
Amounts (utilised)/settled
(9.5)
(3.1)
(5.3)
(2.4)
(20.3)
3.3
At 31 December 2021
93.6
15.1
19.2
8.2
136.1
(15.0)
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Current
55.8
32.6
Non-current
80.3
80.3
At 31 December 
136.1
112.9
*	
Amounts in respect of warranty costs, a £5.0m charge in respect of onerous contract provisions and a £2.3m credit in respect of other provisions have been 
recognised in cost of sales. All other amounts have been recognised within net operating costs. Additional provisions of £29.5m in respect of environmental 
matters have been charged to exceptional operating items (see note 10).
a.	 The Group’s operations and facilities are subject to laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and 
hazardous substances into the ground, air and water as well as the handling, storage and disposal of such materials and other 
environmental matters. Failure to comply with its obligations potentially exposes the Group to serious consequences, including 
fines, other sanctions and limitations on operations. The Group is involved in the investigation and remediation of current and 
former sites for which it has been identified as a potentially responsible party under US law. In determining the provision to be 
recognised, advice is received by the Group from its environmental consultants and legal advisors to assist in the estimate of 
the level and timing of remediation costs, including the period for which operations and monitoring (O&M) activities will be 
required. These estimates are revised regularly as remediation activities progress and further information is obtained on the 
extent of activities for which the Group is responsible. Note 4 describes the Group’s critical accounting estimate in respect of 
the £29.5m recorded as a provision in the year.
	
Provisions are expected to be substantially utilised over the next 20 years and are discounted using an appropriate 
discount rate. 
	
The Group has insurance arrangements in place which, together with other agreements with third parties, partly mitigates the 
ongoing impact of historical environmental events on the Group. A receivable has been established to the extent these costs 
are virtually certain to be recoverable under the Group’s environmental insurance policies or from other parties, typically when 
there is a binding signed agreement in place. Movements in the receivable are shown in the table above (see also note 24). 
Note 4 describes the Group’s critical accounting estimate in respect of amounts recoverable from historic insurers and other 
third parties relating to the matter for which £29.5m has been recorded as a provision in the year.
b.	 Provision has been made for estimated losses under certain trading contracts. Provisions are expected to be substantially 
utilised over the next five years and are not discounted given the short period over which they will be utilised and accordingly 
the impact would be immaterial.
c.	 Provision has been made for product warranty claims. Provisions are expected to be substantially utilised over the next 
three years and are not discounted given the short period over which they will be utilised and accordingly the impact would 
be immaterial.
d.	 A number of asbestos-related claims have been made against subsidiary companies of the Group. To date, the amount 
connected with such claims in any year has not been material and many claims are covered fully or partly by existing insurance 
and indemnities. There is a provision, included within other provisions, for certain claims which cannot be recovered from 
insurers. Provisions are expected to be substantially utilised over the next ten years and are discounted, where appropriate, 
using a discount rate appropriate to each provision.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
218

35. Deferred tax
Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities without taking into consideration the offsetting of balances, are analysed below:
Assets
£’m
Liabilities
£’m
Net 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
124.2
(256.2)
(132.0)
Exchange rate adjustments
(3.1)
5.2
2.1
Businesses disposed
(0.7)
7.4
6.7
Reclassifications
(1.9)
1.9
–
Credit to income statement (see note 13)
6.7
31.9
38.6
Credit to other comprehensive income (see note 13)
12.4
–
12.4
Charge to equity (see note 13)
(2.0)
–
(2.0)
At 31 December 2020
135.6
(209.8)
(74.2)
Exchange rate adjustments
1.5
(1.6)
(0.1)
Credit to income statement (see note 13)
4.3
19.7
24.0
Charge to other comprehensive income (see note 13)
(21.8)
–
(21.8)
Credit to equity
1.2
–
1.2
At 31 December 2021
120.8
(191.7)
(70.9)
Movements in gross deferred tax assets are analysed as follows:
Assets
Provisions
£’m
Retirement
benefit 
obligations
£’m
Contract 
liabilities
£’m
Other 
(*)
£’m
Total 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
30.8
52.2
15.5
25.7
124.2
Exchange rate adjustments
(1.1)
(0.4)
(2.0)
0.4
(3.1)
Businesses disposed
(0.5)
–
(0.9)
0.7
(0.7)
Reclassifications
–
–
–
(1.9)
(1.9)
Credit/(charge) to income statement
4.9
(1.7)
4.6
(1.1)
6.7
Credit to other comprehensive income
–
12.4
–
–
12.4
Charge to equity
–
(1.9)
–
(0.1)
(2.0)
At 31 December 2020
34.1
60.6
17.2
23.7
135.6
Exchange rate adjustments
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.4
1.5
Credit/(charge) to income statement
5.9
(9.5)
0.9
7.0
4.3
Charge to other comprehensive income
–
(21.8)
–
–
(21.8)
Credit to equity
–
–
–
1.2
1.2
At 31 December 2021
40.8
29.4
18.3
32.3
120.8
*	
Includes balances arising from temporary differences in relation to accruals, share-based payments, finance costs and derivative financial instruments, none of 
which are individually material at either balance sheet date or include any material movements during either year.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
219
Financial Statements

35. Deferred tax continued
Movements in gross deferred tax liabilities are analysed as follows:
Liabilities
Intangible 
assets
£’m
Contract 
assets
£’m
Accelerated 
tax 
depreciation
£’m
Total
£’m
At 1 January 2020
(222.4)
(10.9)
(22.9)
(256.2)
Exchange rate adjustments
4.2
0.4
0.6
5.2
Businesses disposed
7.3
–
0.1
7.4
Reclassifications
2.1
–
(0.2)
1.9
Credit/(charge) to income statement 
30.4
(1.1)
2.6
31.9
At 31 December 2020
(178.4)
(11.6)
(19.8)
(209.8)
Exchange rate adjustments
(1.4)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(1.6)
Credit/(charge) to income statement
13.7
0.5
5.5
19.7
At 31 December 2021
(166.1)
(11.2)
(14.4)
(191.7)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current 
tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same tax authority. The balances after allowing for such offsets are 
as follows:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Deferred tax assets
–
19.2
Deferred tax liabilities
(70.9)
(93.4)
Net balance at 31 December
(70.9)
(74.2)
Deferred tax liabilities all fall due after more than one year. Deferred tax assets are analysed as follows:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
To be recovered within one year
–
4.4
To be recovered after more than one year
–
14.8
Total
–
19.2
The Group has unrecognised tax losses of £8.0m (2020: £8.0m) for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised. No asset 
has been recognised in respect of these losses, as it is not regarded as probable they will be recovered. Deferred tax assets not 
recognised would be recoverable in the event they reverse and suitable taxable profits are available. There are no unremitted 
earnings in foreign subsidiaries that would give rise to a tax liability in the event of those subsidiaries remitting their earnings.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
220

36. Retirement benefit obligations
Pension schemes
The Group operates a number of pension schemes for the benefit of its employees. The nature of each scheme which has a 
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements is detailed below: 
•	 In the UK, the Group operates a funded defined benefit scheme. This scheme is closed to new members and, following 
conclusion of a consultation process with active members of the scheme, the scheme was closed to future accrual for all 
members with effect from 6 April 2021. It is a registered scheme and subject to the statutory scheme-specific funding 
requirements outlined in UK legislation, including the payment of levies to the Pension Protection Fund. It is established under 
trust and the responsibility for its governance lies with the trustees who also agree funding arrangements with the Group.
•	 In the US, the Group operates three principal defined benefit schemes, each of which is closed to future accrual for all members. 
The schemes are tax-qualified pension schemes regulated by the US Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor, 
and are insured by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation up to certain limits. They are established under, and governed 
by, the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974, including the Pension 
Protection Act of 2006. Meggitt is a named fiduciary and plan administrator with the authority to manage the operation of the 
schemes. The Group also operates two small unfunded schemes.
•	 In Switzerland, the Group operates a funded defined benefit scheme which is open to new members and future accrual. 
The scheme is a tax-qualified pension plan subject to the Swiss Federal Law on Occupational Retirement, Survivors’ and 
Disability Plans which constitutes a legal framework setting out the minimum requirements for occupational pension plans. 
Responsibility for its governance lies with a foundation, which is similar in nature to a UK trustee board.
The UK and US schemes provide benefits to members in the form of a guaranteed level of pension payable for life. The benefits 
provided depend on a member’s length of service. For the UK scheme, benefits are dependent on salary at the date of closure 
to future accrual or average salary over employment in the final years leading up to the date of closure to future accrual, together 
with inflation linked to CPI for the period from closure to future accrual to retirement. In the US, the schemes either provide a 
benefit linked to salary at the date they were closed to future accrual or provide a fixed benefit for each year of service. The Swiss 
scheme has many of the characteristics of a defined contribution scheme, but provides for certain minimum benefits to be 
guaranteed to members. 
For all funded schemes, benefit payments are made from funds administered by third parties unrelated to the Group. The assets 
of such schemes are held in trust funds, or their equivalent, separate from the Group’s finances. For all unfunded schemes, benefit 
payments are made by the Group as obligations fall due.
The Group also operates a number of defined contribution schemes under which the Group has no further obligations once 
contributions have been made.
Healthcare schemes
The Group has two principal other post-retirement benefit schemes providing medical and life assurance benefits to certain 
employees and former employees of Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation and Meggitt (Rockmart), Inc. These schemes 
are unfunded and closed to new members.
Amounts recognised in the income statement
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Total charge in respect of defined contribution pension schemes
26.5
19.9
Service cost
6.5
14.5
Past service (credit)/cost 
(0.2)
0.1
Curtailment gain
(8.0)
–
Administrative expenses borne directly by schemes
2.5
2.6
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations
3.2
4.3
Total charge in respect of defined benefit pension schemes
4.0
21.5
Service cost
0.3
0.7
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations
0.9
1.4
Total charge in respect of healthcare schemes
1.2
2.1
Total charge
31.7
43.5
Of the total charge, £25.1m (2020: £35.2m) is included in employee costs (see note 8), of which £14.8m (2020: £19.2m) has been 
recognised in cost of sales and £10.3m (2020: £16.0m) in net operating costs. Of the remaining charge, £2.5m (2020: £2.6m) has 
been recognised in net operating costs in respect of scheme administration expenses and £4.1m (2020: £5.7m) is recognised in 
finance costs (see note 12). 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
221
Financial Statements

36. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Amounts recognised in the income statement continued
Following closure of the UK scheme to future accrual, a curtailment gain of £8.0m was recognised in the year (2020: £Nil), which 
arises from the reduction in scheme liabilities as a result of breaking the salary and career average revalued earnings revaluation 
link for members in service at the date of closure.
The Group has estimated, with the advice of its actuary, that the impact of the High Court ruling in 2020 in respect of the 
requirement to provide uplifts to transfer values paid before 26 October 2018 to address inequalities in the calculation of 
Guaranteed Minimum Pension obligations is not significant.
Amounts recognised on the balance sheet
 
2021
2020
UK 
pension 
scheme 
£’m
Overseas*
pension 
schemes 
£’m
US 
healthcare 
schemes 
£’m
Total
£’m
UK 
pension 
scheme 
£’m
Overseas*
pension 
schemes 
£’m
US 
healthcare 
schemes 
£’m
Total 
 
 
£’m
Present value of liabilities
899.3
417.3
38.5
1,355.1
961.1
456.1
46.7
1,463.9
Fair value of assets
(839.9)
(388.1)
–
(1,228.0)
(774.5)
(394.0)
–
(1,168.5)
Effect of asset ceiling**
–
9.3
–
9.3
–
–
–
–
Retirement benefit obligations
59.4
38.5
38.5
136.4
186.6
62.1
46.7
295.4
*	
Includes £36.1m (2020: £46.8m) in respect of US schemes.
**	
The asset ceiling relates to surpluses in one of the Group’s US defined benefit schemes and its Swiss defined benefit scheme, which have not been recognised as 
future economic benefits are not available to the Group in the form either of a reduction in contributions or a refund. 
Of the total deficit of £136.4m (2020: £295.4m), £52.3m (2020: £61.7m) is in respect of unfunded schemes.
Changes in the present value of retirement benefit obligations 
 
2021
2020
Liabilities
 
£’m
Assets
 
£’m
Asset 
ceiling 
£’m
Total
 
£’m
Liabilities
 
£’m
Assets
 
£’m
Total
 
£’m
At 1 January
1,463.9
(1,168.5)
–
295.4
1,347.5
(1,079.6)
267.9
Exchange rate adjustments
0.8
(0.7)
–
0.1
(4.0)
2.2
(1.8)
Service cost
6.8
–
–
6.8
15.2
–
15.2
Past service (credit)/cost
(0.2)
–
–
(0.2)
0.1
–
0.1
Curtailment gain
(8.0)
–
–
(8.0)
–
–
–
Net interest expense (see note 12)
24.6
(20.5)
–
4.1
28.4
(22.7)
5.7
Contributions – Group
–
(48.9)
–
(48.9)
–
(36.9)
(36.9)
Contributions – Members
2.8
(2.8)
–
–
2.5
(2.5)
–
Benefits paid
(58.3)
58.3
–
–
(60.8)
60.8
–
Settlements
–
–
–
–
(1.1)
1.1
–
Administrative expenses borne directly by schemes
–
2.5
–
2.5
–
2.6
2.6
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations:
  Experience gain
(9.4)
–
–
(9.4)
(7.8)
–
(7.8)
  Gain from change in demographic assumptions
(20.7)
–
–
(20.7)
(2.4)
–
(2.4)
  (Gain)/loss from change in financial assumptions
(47.2)
–
–
(47.2)
146.3
–
146.3
  Return on schemes’ assets excluding amounts 
included in finance costs
–
(47.4)
–
(47.4)
–
(93.5)
(93.5)
  Change in the effect of asset ceiling
–
–
9.3
9.3
–
–
–
Total remeasurement (gain)/loss
(77.3)
(47.4)
9.3
(115.4)
136.1
(93.5)
42.6
At 31 December
1,355.1
(1,228.0)
9.3
136.4
1,463.9
(1,168.5)
295.4
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
222

36. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Analysis of pension scheme assets

 
2021
 2020
Quoted
£’m
Unquoted
£’m
Total
£’m
%
Quoted
£’m
Unquoted
£’m
Total
£’m
%
Equities
199.1
–
199.1
23.7
208.5
–
208.5
26.9
Government bonds 
371.9
–
371.9
44.3
314.5
–
314.5
40.6
Corporate bonds
85.5
0.3
85.8
10.2
102.4
0.5
102.9
13.3
Hedge funds
–
41.6
41.6
4.9
–
54.3
54.3
7.0
Property funds
–
47.7
47.7
5.7
–
41.6
41.6
5.4
Cash
42.0
–
42.0
5.0
24.4
–
24.4
3.1
Derivative assets/(liabilities)
15.9
23.7
39.6
4.7
8.1
(2.1)
6.0
0.8
Other assets*
–
12.2
12.2
1.5
9.0
13.3
22.3
2.9
UK pension scheme
714.4
125.5
839.9
100.0
666.9
107.6
774.5
100.0
Equities
39.3
0.9
40.2
10.4
35.1
4.5
39.6
10.1
Government bonds 
81.1
–
81.1
21.0
87.6
–
87.6
22.2
Corporate bonds
187.5
–
187.5
48.2
203.3
–
203.3
51.6
Property funds
31.2
2.8
34.0
8.8
28.6
3.7
32.3
8.2
Cash
18.0
–
18.0
4.6
9.0
–
9.0
2.3
Derivative assets
7.8
–
7.8
2.0
5.3
–
5.3
1.3
Other assets*
19.5
–
19.5
5.0
16.9
–
16.9
4.3
Overseas pension schemes
384.4
3.7
388.1
100.0
385.8
8.2
394.0
100.0
Equities
238.4
0.9
239.3
19.5
243.6
4.5
248.1
21.2
Government bonds 
453.0
–
453.0
36.9
402.1
–
402.1
34.4
Corporate bonds
273.0
0.3
273.3
22.2
305.7
0.5
306.2
26.2
Hedge funds
–
41.6
41.6
3.4
–
54.3
54.3
4.6
Property funds
31.2
50.5
81.7
6.6
28.6
45.3
73.9
6.3
Cash
60.0
–
60.0
4.9
33.4
–
33.4
2.9
Derivative assets/(liabilities)
23.7
23.7
47.4
3.9
13.4
(2.1)
11.3
1.0
Other assets*
19.5
12.2
31.7
2.6
25.9
13.3
39.2
3.4
Total pension schemes’ assets
1,098.8
129.2
1,228.0
100.0
1,052.7
115.8
1,168.5
100.0
*	
Other assets principally comprise annuities, mortgages and emerging market debt, no category of which is individually material. 
The schemes have no investments in any assets of the Group.
Financial assumptions used to calculate scheme liabilities
2021
2020
UK 
pension 
scheme 
%
US 
pension 
schemes 
%
US 
healthcare 
schemes  
%
UK 
pension 
scheme  
%
US
pension 
schemes  
%
US 
healthcare 
schemes  
%
Discount rate* 
1.8
2.8
2.8
1.4
2.3
2.3
Inflation rate (RPI)
3.4
n/a
n/a
3.0
n/a
n/a
Increases to deferred benefits during deferment**
2.7
n/a
n/a
2.3
n/a
n/a
Increases to pensions in payment**
3.2
n/a
n/a
2.9
n/a
n/a
Salary increases***
n/a
n/a
n/a
2.8
n/a
n/a
*	
The discount rate for the Swiss scheme was 0.34% (2020: 0.08%).
**	
To the extent not overridden by specific scheme rules.
***	 No longer relevant following closure of the UK scheme to future accrual with effect from 6 April 2021.
In determining the fair value of scheme liabilities, the Group uses mortality assumptions which are based on published mortality 
tables adjusted to reflect the characteristics of the scheme populations. 
In the UK, mortality assumptions are based on the most recently published Continuous Mortality Investigation model (the 
CMI_20 model) using the default model parameter that since the long-term impacts of COVID-19 on mortality improvements 
are still largely unknown, no weighting is applied to actual mortality experience in 2020. Assumptions are adjusted to reflect the 
profile of the membership of the scheme, which includes the results of a refreshed analysis of the scheme’s membership used 
to support the 2021 triennial actuarial valuation. Allowance has been made for rates of mortality to continue to fall at the rate of 
1.25% per annum.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
223
Financial Statements

36. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Financial assumptions used to calculate scheme liabilities continued
In the US, mortality assumptions are based on the PriH-2012 headcount weighted table, for schemes where benefits are not salary-
linked, and the Pri-2012 table for other schemes, with both tables projecting rates of mortality to fall using the 2021 Social Security 
Administration’s Intermediate-Cost Projections scale.
In Switzerland, mortality assumptions are based on the BVG/LPP 2020 (Generational) tables with an allowance for rates of mortality 
to continue to fall at the rate of 1.25% per annum.
 
2021
2020
UK 
scheme 
Years
US
schemes 
Years
Swiss
scheme 
Years
UK 
scheme 
Years
US
schemes 
Years
Swiss
scheme 
Years
Member age 45 (life expectancy at age 65) – male
22.9-24.8
21.0-21.9
23.3
23.1-25.0
21.0-21.9
24.5
Member age 45 (life expectancy at age 65) – female
25.5-26.9
23.5-23.7
25.0
25.6-26.9
23.4-23.6
26.5
Member age 65 (current life expectancy) – male
21.6-23.4
19.8-20.7
22.8
21.7-23.6
19.7-20.6
22.7
Member age 65 (current life expectancy) – female
24.0-25.5
22.3-22.6
24.9
24.2-25.5
22.3-22.5
24.8
Details on the sensitivity of scheme liabilities to changes in key assumptions are provided below:
•	 The impact of either a 50 basis point reduction or increase in discount rate, the average annual movement in discount rates 
observed over the last five years, would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 2021 to either increase by approximately 
£114.0m or decrease by approximately £101.0m respectively.
•	 The impact of a 50 basis point increase in inflation rates would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 2021 to increase by 
approximately £50.0m.

•	 The impact of assuming every scheme member were to live for an additional year would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 
2021 to increase by approximately £51.0m.
The above sensitivities are based on a change in a single assumption while keeping all other assumptions constant. In practice, 
this is unlikely to occur and changes in assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit 
obligation to significant actuarial assumptions, the same method of calculating the defined benefit obligation has been used as 
when calculating the retirement benefit obligations recognised on the balance sheet. The methods and types of assumptions 
used in preparing the sensitivity analysis are consistent with the previous year. The sensitivity for inflation has been increased 
from 10 basis points in 2020 to 50 basis points in 2021, given the increases experienced in the current year. No changes have been 
considered necessary to any other sensitivity levels.
Risks
The Group is exposed to a number of risks arising from operating its defined benefit pension and healthcare schemes, the most 
significant of which are detailed below. The Group has not changed the process used to manage defined benefit scheme risks 
during the year unless otherwise stated. 
Asset volatility
This risk is partly mitigated by funded schemes investing in matching corporate bonds, such that changes in asset values are 
offset by similar changes in the value of scheme liabilities. However, the Group also invests in other asset classes such as equities, 
property funds, hedge funds and derivatives where movements in asset values may be uncorrelated to movements in the yields 
on high quality corporate bonds. The Group believes that, due to the long-term nature of its scheme liabilities, it is appropriate 
to invest in assets which are expected to outperform corporate bonds over this timeframe. Scheme assets are well diversified, 
such that the failure of any single investment would not have a material impact on the overall level of assets. Both the UK and US 
schemes have purchased equity derivatives which enable the schemes to benefit from equity-like returns, subject to certain caps, 
whilst providing an element of protection against falls in equity markets. These derivatives cover approximately 30% of the total 
equities held by the schemes and have an average remaining life of 0.7 years at 31 December 2021. The Group actively monitors 
how the duration and expected yield of scheme assets match the expected cash outflows arising from its pension obligations. 
For each UK and US funded scheme, there is a “glide-path” in place which provides, to the extent the funding position improves, 
for asset volatility to be reduced by reduced exposure to return seeking assets and increased investment in bonds with maturities 
that match benefit payments as they fall due.
Interest risk
In both the UK and the US, schemes invest in government bonds and corporate bonds as part of their hedging strategy. 
Additionally, in the UK, the scheme has invested in cash flow matching credit assets and interest rate derivatives to provide 
additional hedging against interest risk exposures. At 31 December 2021, approximately 85% of the interest rate risk on the UK 
scheme’s liabilities, measured on a funding basis, is hedged (2020: 80%). In the US, across the three funded schemes, hedging 
levels range from 90% to 98% of scheme liabilities measured on a funding basis (2020: 80% to 90%). 
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
224

36. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Risks continued
Inflation risk
Following closure of the UK scheme to future accrual with effect from 6 April 2021, it is no longer exposed to salary inflation risk. 
Inflation risk in the UK in respect of deferred benefits and pensions in payment is mitigated by caps on the levels of inflation under 
the scheme rules. Residual inflation risk (after scheme caps) is mitigated through investing in index linked gilts and inflation rate 
derivatives. At 31 December 2021, these assets cover approximately 85% of liabilities measured on a funding basis (2020: 80%). 
In the US, schemes do not provide benefits at retirement which are dependent on future salary increases and the impact for the 
scheme in Switzerland of salary inflation is not significant. In both the US and Switzerland, schemes provide for no inflation to be 
applied to benefits in deferment or retirement. Exposure to inflation on US healthcare costs has been mitigated by freezing Group 
contributions to medical costs at 2011 cost levels.
Longevity risk
To the extent life expectancy exceeds the Group’s estimates, the retirement benefit obligations recognised in the consolidated 
financial statements would increase. This risk is more significant in the UK scheme, where the average duration of its liabilities is 
longer compared to the US schemes and inflationary increases more common, resulting in higher sensitivity to changes in life 
expectancy. The Group currently does not use derivatives to mitigate this risk. 
Other information 

In the UK, the most recent triennial valuation was as at 5 April 2018 at which date the deficit was measured for funding purposes 
at £171.8m. As part of this valuation, the Group agreed with the trustees that it would make deficit contributions, which would 
increase by approximately 5% each year in the expectation that these payments, together with asset returns, would eliminate 
the deficit by August 2023. Following the COVID-19 outbreak, the Group agreed with the trustees to defer four months’ deficit 
contributions originally due to be made in 2020 amounting to £9.6m and which are being made over the remainder of the current 
recovery plan to August 2023. Deficit contributions recommenced in Q3 of 2020. Under the amended recovery plan, the Group will 
make deficit contributions of £40.2m in 2022 and £29.9m in the period to August 2023. 
The 2021 triennial valuation at 5 April 2021 is substantially complete and is expected to be finalised in H1 2022. The draft valuation 
results indicate an additional funding shortfall, not covered by the deficit payments being made under the existing amended 
recovery plan, of approximately £60.0m. This additional shortfall principally arises due to a significant reduction in gilt rates 
between the two valuation dates and is equivalent to approximately 1.5 years of additional deficit contributions, based on the 
annual deficit payments being made under the existing 2018 recovery plan. Discussions with the trustees to agree the timing of 
contributions to meet the additional funding shortfall have not yet been concluded. 
The buy-out valuation at the 2018 valuation date was measured at £467.9m. The draft 2021 valuation results indicate an equivalent 
buy-out valuation at the 2021 valuation date of approximately £380.0m. These buy-out valuations assume the Group were to 
transfer responsibility of the scheme to an insurance company, the Group has no current plans to make such a transfer. 
To the extent the present value of future deficit payments agreed as part of the actuarial valuation exceed the scheme accounting 
deficit at the balance sheet date, such amounts would be recoverable by the Group under the scheme rules once the last member 
has died and accordingly no additional minimum funding liability arises.
In the US, minimum deficit reduction payments are driven by regulations and provide for deficits to be eliminated over periods 
up to 15 years. At 31 December 2021, the three funded schemes had funding levels of 81%, 93% and 98% respectively. Absent any 
changes in legislation, no deficit contributions are currently expected to be required until 2025. Deficit contributions are expected 
to be £0.8m in 2025 and £1.5m in 2026. The present value of deficit payments due under legislation does not exceed the schemes’ 
deficits at 31 December 2021 and accordingly no additional minimum funding liability arises. 
The Swiss scheme has a surplus on a funding basis of £30.0m and no additional minimum funding liability arises.
Estimated total Group contributions expected to be paid to the schemes during 2022 are £47.2m.
The weighted average duration of the schemes’ defined benefit obligations are 18.7 years (UK scheme), 10.5 years (US schemes) 
and 17.8 years (Swiss scheme). 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
225
Financial Statements

36. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Other information continued
The expected maturity of undiscounted pension and healthcare benefits at 31 December 2021 is as follows:
 
Pension 
schemes 
£’m
Healthcare 
 schemes 
£’m
Total 
 
£’m
To be made in 2022
49.3
2.9
52.2
To be made in 2023
50.1
2.8
52.9
To be made in 2024 to 2026
153.3
7.7
161.0
To be made in 2027 to 2031
269.3
10.8
280.1
To be made in 2032 to 2036
271.9
8.5
280.4
To be made in 2037 to 2041
253.4
6.4
259.8
To be made in 2042 to 2046
223.1
4.7
227.8
To be made from 2047 onwards
549.0
7.8
556.8
Total expected benefit payments
1,819.4
51.6
1,871.0
37. Share capital
 
Ordinary 
shares of 
5p each 
Number ‘m
Nominal 
 value 
 
£’m
Net 
consideration 
 
£’m
Allotted and fully paid:
At 1 January 2020
777.5
38.8
Issued on exercise of Sharesave awards
3.7
0.2
–
At 31 December 2020
781.2
39.0
Issued on exercise of Sharesave awards
0.8
0.1
–
At 31 December 2021
782.0
39.1
The Company does not have an authorised share capital.
38. Share-based payment

The Group operates a number of share schemes for the benefit of its employees. The total expense recognised in net operating 
costs in respect of such schemes (see note 8) is analysed as follows:
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Meggitt Long-Term Incentive Plan 2014 – Equity-settled
3.8
(3.0)
Meggitt Long-Term Incentive Plan 2014 – Cash-settled
–
(0.1)
Deferred Share Bonus Plan – Equity-settled
0.8
0.3
Deferred Share Bonus Plan – Cash-settled
0.2
–
Sharesave Plans – Equity-settled
0.7
0.3
Total expense/(credit)
5.5
(2.5)
Meggitt Long-Term Incentive Plan 2014: Equity-settled
Under this plan, an annual award of shares may be made to certain senior executives. Two different awards can be granted under 
the Plan – Performance Share Awards (PSAs) and Restricted Share Awards (RSAs). The number of shares, if any, that an executive 
ultimately receives in respect of a PSA, depends on three performance conditions:
•	 an earnings per share measure (33% of the award); 
•	 a return on assets measure (33% of the award); and
•	 a strategic goals measure (33% of the award).
Each of the conditions is measured over a three-year performance period. For RSAs, vesting is subject to a general assessment 
by the Remuneration Committee of overall Group performance, together with any wider considerations it considers appropriate. 
For both PSAs and RSAs, an employee is generally entitled to a payment at the end of the vesting period, equivalent to dividends 
that would have been paid during the vesting period, on any shares that vest. There is no exercise price payable by the employees. 
The fair value of the awards made in 2021 has been estimated at the market price of the share on the date of grant, which was 
433.2 pence (2020: 579.6 pence). 
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
226

38. Share-based payment
continued
Meggitt Long-Term Incentive Plan 2014: Equity-settled continued
Movements in the number of outstanding shares that may potentially be released to employees are as follows:
 
2021 
Number of 
shares 
under 
award 
outstanding 
‘m
2020 
Number of 
shares 
under 
award 
outstanding 
‘m
At 1 January
14.7
16.0
Awarded 
3.6
4.1
Exercised
(1.0)
(2.4)
Lapsed
(6.5)
(3.0)
At 31 December 
10.8
14.7
At 31 December 2021, there are 9.4m PSAs outstanding (2020: 14.7m) and 1.4m RSAs (2020: Nil). At 31 December 2021, 0.6m PSAs 
are eligible for release. The remaining 10.2m shares under award have a weighted average life of 385 days until they are eligible 
for release.
39. Own shares
Own shares represent shares in the Company that are held by an independently managed Employee Share Ownership Plan 
Trust (the trust) formed to acquire shares to be used to satisfy share options and awards under the employee share schemes as 
described in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 126 to 155. At December 2021, the trust holds 2.0m ordinary shares 
(2020: 3.8m ordinary shares) which are unallocated, being retained by the trust for future use. The shares are held for the benefit 
of employees. Of the shares held at 31 December 2021, 0.8m were issued during 2021 and 1.2m were issued during 2020. 
Their market value at 31 December 2021 is £14.4m (2020: £17.6m), representing 0.25% of the issued share capital of the Company 
(2020: 0.48%).



40. Contractual commitments
Capital commitments
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Contracted for but not incurred: 
Intangible assets
0.8
3.8
Property, plant and equipment
6.8
24.0
Total
7.6
27.8
Other financial commitments
The Group enters into long-term arrangements with aircraft and original equipment manufacturers for the design and 
development of products. This represents a significant long-term financial commitment for the Group and requires the 
consideration of a number of uncertainties including the feasibility of the product and the ultimate commercial viability over a 
period which can extend over 35 years. The Directors are satisfied that, at this time, there are no significant contingent liabilities 
arising from these commitments. The future estimated expenditure under contractual commitments to incur development costs 
at 31 December 2021, is shown in the table below.
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
In one year or less
34.3
33.4
In more than one year but not more than five years
18.2
17.8
In more than five years 
10.7
8.9
Total
63.2
60.1
As part of the Scheme Document issued by the Group on 16 August 2021 in connection with the proposed acquisition of the 
Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation, the Group estimated its aggregate fees relating to financial and corporate broking advice 
would be £43.0m, which are dependent on whether the acquisition is completed. These amounts have not been recognised in the 
consolidated financial statements, but represent a financial commitment of the Group in the event the acquisition is completed. 
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
227
Financial Statements

41. Contingent liabilities
The Company has given guarantees in respect of credit facilities for certain of its subsidiaries, some property and other leases, 
and the performance by some current and former subsidiaries of certain contracts. Also, there are similar guarantees given by 
certain other Group companies. The Directors believe that the probability of an outflow of economic benefits arising from the 
guarantees is remote.
The Company and various of its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to legal proceedings, regulatory investigations 
and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Directors do not anticipate that the outcome of these 
proceedings, investigations and claims, either individually or in aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon the Group’s 
financial position.
42. Cash inflow from operations
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Profit/(loss) for the year
31.2
(314.2)
Adjustments for:
  Finance income (see note 11)
(0.5)
(0.5)
  Finance costs (see note 12)
32.6
37.2
  Tax charge/(credit) (see note 13)
0.1
(19.8)
  Depreciation (see note 20)
55.9
56.7
  Amortisation (see notes 18 and 19)
134.5
140.6
  Impairment losses (see notes 17, 18 and 19)
5.7
361.3
  (Gain)/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
(5.3)
1.4
  Loss/(gain) on disposal of businesses (see note 9)
7.3
(32.0)
  Costs arising on disposal of businesses
(6.7)
(3.8)
  (Gain)/loss on financial instruments (see note 9)
(16.7)
2.9
  Impact of retranslating net foreign currency cash at spot rate
0.5
(0.4)
  Share of loss after tax of joint venture (see note 21)
0.4
3.2
  Retirement benefit obligation deficit payments
(42.1)
(21.7)
  Share-based payment expense/(credit) (see note 38)
5.5
(2.5)
Changes in working capital:
  Inventories
(32.8)
39.8
  Trade and other receivables
(43.5)
115.0
  Contract assets
(2.7)
(4.3)
  Trade and other payables
16.4
(146.2)
  Contract liabilities
12.6
1.7
  Provisions
18.8
14.0
Cash inflow from operations
171.2
228.4
The Board uses free cash flow to monitor and measure the underlying trading cash performance of the Group. It excludes 
amounts received and/or paid in respect of M&A activity for the reasons set out in note 9a. It is reconciled to cash from operating 
activities below:
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Cash inflow from operating activities
105.3
154.2
Add back cash outflow from business disposal expenses
3.5
5.2
Add back impact of retranslating net foreign currency cash at spot rate
(0.5)
0.4
Capitalised development costs (see note 18)
(27.6)
(41.4)
Capitalised programme participation costs
(1.7)
(1.6)
Purchase of intangible assets
(10.7)
(11.0)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (net of grants received)
(59.0)
(78.7)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment*
36.4
1.3
Reverse lease premium received
–
3.5
Free cash inflow
45.7
31.9
*	
In 2021, includes £19.4m relating to proceeds from the sale and leaseback of the Group’s Engine Systems facility in North Hollywood, USA and £12.7m relating to 
proceeds from the sale and leaseback of the Group’s Airframe Systems facility in Loughborough, UK.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
228

43. Movements in net debt
Bank and  
other 
borrowings: 
Current 
£’m
Bank and  
other 
borrowings: 
Non-current
£’m
Lease 
liabilities:  
Current
 
£’m
Lease
liabilities:  
Non-
current
£’m
Total 
debt
£’m
Cash and 
cash
equivalents
£’m
Net 
debt 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
219.4
694.5
16.4
136.2
1,066.5
(155.3)
911.2
Cash inflow from operating activities
–
–
–
–
–
(154.2)
(154.2)
Cash outflow from investing activities
–
–
–
–
–
22.0
22.0
Cash outflow from financing activities*
(215.1)
125.5
(11.9)
–
(101.5)
101.2
(0.3)
Lease liabilities entered
–
–
–
11.4
11.4
–
11.4
Businesses disposed or classified as held for sale
–
–
(1.7)
(3.9)
(5.6)
–
(5.6)
Exchange rate adjustments
9.1
(22.2)
(0.3)
(1.9)
(15.3)
7.7
(7.6)
Other movements
(2.9)
(1.0)
12.2
(12.2)
(3.9)
–
(3.9)
At 31 December 2020
10.5
796.8
14.7
129.6
951.6
(178.6)
773.0
Cash inflow from operating activities
–
–
–
–
–
(105.3)
(105.3)
Cash outflow from investing activities
–
–
–
–
–
47.8
47.8
Cash outflow from financing activities*
0.4
(31.6)
(14.9)
–
(46.1)
44.8
(1.3)
Lease liabilities entered
–
–
4.0
34.7
38.7
–
38.7
Businesses disposed
–
–
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
–
(0.1)
Exchange rate adjustments
0.2
25.5
0.2
0.8
26.7
0.5
27.2
Other movements**
94.2
(94.7)
11.7
(11.7)
(0.5)
–
(0.5)
At 31 December 2021
105.3
696.0
15.6
153.4
970.3
(190.8)
779.5
* 	
Cash flows relating to bank and other borrowings are disclosed in the cash flow statement as proceeds from borrowings of £1.2m (2020: £618.6m), repayments of 
borrowings of £30.5m (2020: £705.8m) and debt issue costs paid of £1.9m (2020: £2.4m). 
**	
Other movements includes reclassification of bank and other borrowings from non-current to current of £92.8m, as their maturity date is now less than 12 months 
from the balance sheet date.
44. Business disposals
During 2020, the Group agreed the disposal of the trade and assets of its aircraft ducting business, based in Dunstable, UK, 
together with a small product line from one of the Group’s other businesses. The related assets were classified as a disposal group 
held for sale at 31 December 2020, together with the directly associated liabilities. The disposal subsequently completed on 
30 January 2021 for a consideration of £20.4m. Additionally, on 31 August 2021, the Group disposed of a number of product lines 
from its power and sensing business based in Toulouse, France for a consideration of 1 euro. In addition, a commercial subsidy 
payment by the Group of 9.8m euros was agreed to provide assistance to the buyer to integrate the business; this is payable by 
the Group in instalments. The businesses disposed were not major lines of business or geographical areas of operation of the 
Group. The net assets of the businesses at the date of disposal were as follows:
 
Dunstable 
operations
£’m
Toulouse 
product 
lines
£’m
Total 
£’m
Property, plant and equipment (see note 20)
 –
0.5
0.5
Inventories
 –
0.6
0.6
Lease liabilities – current
 –
(0.1)
(0.1)
Assets classified as held for sale (see note 22)
11.7
 –
11.7
Net assets disposed
11.7
1.0
12.7
Consideration receivable/(payable)
20.4
(8.3)
12.1
Business disposal expenses payable
(1.0)
 (0.8)
(1.8)
Consideration receivable/(payable) net of business disposal expenses
19.4
(9.1)
10.3
Gain/(loss) on disposal
7.7
(10.1)
(2.4)
Consideration receivable/(payable)
20.4
(8.3)
12.1
Less deferred consideration payable in future years
–
 4.6
4.6
Consideration received/(paid) in cash
20.4
(3.7)
16.7
Business disposal expenses paid
(1.0)
 (0.8)
(1.8)
Total cash inflow/(outflow) relating to disposals in the year
19.4
(4.5)
14.9
Expenses paid relating to the proposed acquisition of the Group by Parker-Hannifin Corporation
(1.1)
Expenses paid relating to disposals in prior years
(0.6)
Total cash inflow
13.2
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
229
Financial Statements

Subsidiaries – directly owned 
Dunlop Aerospace Limited
Integrated Target Services Limited
KDG Holdings Limited
Meggitt (Pamphill) Limited
Meggitt (Sand) Limited
Meggitt (Wimborne) Limited
Meggitt Engineering Limited
Meggitt International Holdings Limited³
Meggitt Pension Trust Limited
Negretti & Zambra Limited
Negretti Limited
Phoenix Travel (Dorset) Limited1
The Microsystems Group Limited
Subsidiaries – indirectly owned 
Aero-Tech Composites de Mexico, S. de R.L. 
de C.V. (Mexico)2
Carretera a Zacatecas 5570-1, Parque Industrial Amistad 
Sur, Saltillo, Coahuila, 25070
Aircraft Braking Systems Europe Limited 
Aircraft Braking Systems Services Limited 
Alston Properties, LLC (USA)7
1955 N. Surveyor Ave., Simi Valley, California, 93063
Artus SAS (France)
Chemin du Champ des Martyrs, 49240 Avrillé
Atlantic House Pension Trustee Limited
BAJ Coatings Limited4
Bells Engineering Limited
Bestobell Aviation Products Limited
Bestobell Engineering Products Limited
Bestobell Insulation Limited
Bestobell Meterflow Limited
Bestobell Mobrey Limited
Bestobell Service Co Limited
Bestobell Sparling Limited
Cavehurst Limited
Dunlop Aerospace Group Limited3
Dunlop Aerospace Holdings Limited3
Dunlop Aerospace Overseas 
Investments Limited 
Dunlop Aerospace Overseas Limited3
Dunlop Holdings Limited3
Dunlop Limited3
Europeenne de Conception et d’Etudes  
Technologiques SAS (France)
196 rue Louis Rustin, Archamps Technopole, 
74160 Archamps
Evershed & Vignoles Limited
Heatric Limited5
King Tool International Limited
Meggitt (Baltimore), Inc. (USA)6
3310 Carlins Park Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21215
Meggitt (Canford) Limited
Meggitt (Colehill) Limited
Meggitt (Erlanger), LLC (USA)6
1400 Jamike Avenue, Erlanger, Kentucky, 41018
Meggitt (France) SAS (France)
196 rue Louis Rustin, Archamps Technopole, 
74160 Archamps
Meggitt (Hurn) Limited
Meggitt (Korea) Limited
Meggitt (North Hollywood), Inc. (USA)6
12838 Saticoy Street, North Hollywood,  
California 91605
Meggitt (Orange County), Inc. (USA)6
4 Marconi, Irvine, California 92618
Meggitt Overseas Limited
Meggitt (Rockmart), Inc. (USA)6
669 Goodyear Street, Rockmart, Georgia 30153
Meggitt (San Diego), Inc. (USA)6
6650 Top Gun Street, San Diego, California 92121
Meggitt (Sapphire) GmbH (Germany)
Kaiserleistraße 51, 63067 Offenbach
Meggitt (Sapphire) Limited
Meggitt (Sensorex) SAS (France)
196 rue Louis Rustin, Archamps Technopole, 
74160 Archamps
Meggitt (Shapwick) Limited
Meggitt (Simi Valley), Inc. (USA)6
1955 N. Surveyor Ave., Simi Valley, California, 93063
Meggitt (Tarrant) Limited
Meggitt (Troy), Inc. (USA)6
3 Industrial Drive, Troy, Indiana 47588
Meggitt (UK) Limited
Meggitt (Vietnam) Co., Ltd (Vietnam)8
#7 Road 16A. Bienhoa Industrial Zone 2
Meggitt (Xiamen) Sensors & Controls Co., Ltd. 
(China)9
No.230, South 5 Gaoqi Road, Huli District, Xiamen City, 
Fujian Province
Meggitt A/S (Denmark)
Porthusvej 4, 3490 Kvistgaard
Meggitt Acquisition Limited3
Meggitt Advanced Composites Limited3
Meggitt Aerospace Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. 
(Singapore)
1A Seletar Aerospace Link, 797552
Meggitt Aerospace Holdings Limited3
Meggitt Aerospace Limited
Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation 
(USA)6
1204 Massillon Road, Akron, Ohio 44306
Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems Kentucky 
Corporation (USA)6
190 Corporate Drive, Danville, Kentucky 40422
Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems Queretaro  
S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)2
Carretera Estatal 200 Queretaro-Tequisquiapan, Km 22 + 
547 Interior A, Parque Aeroespacial, Queretaro, Colon, 
Qro., C.P. 76270
Meggitt Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
1A Seletar Aerospace Link, 797552
Meggitt Brasil Solucoes de Engenharia Ltda. 
(Brazil)9
Avenida João Cabral de Mello Neto, No. 850, Suites 815 
and 816, Barra da Tijuca, CEP 22.775-057, City and State 
of Rio de Janeiro
Meggitt Canada Enterprises Inc. (Canada)12
6140 boul. Henri-Bourassa O, Montréal (Québec) H4R3A6
Meggitt Defense Systems, Inc. (USA)6
9801 Muirlands Boulevard, Irvine, California 92618
Meggitt Filtration & Transfer Limited
Meggitt Finance (Beta)
Meggitt Finance Limited
Meggitt GmbH (Germany)
Kaiserleistraße 51, 63067 Offenbach
Meggitt Holdings (France) SAS (France)
Chemin du Champ des Martyrs, 49240 Avrillé
Meggitt Holdings (USA) Inc. (USA)6
1955 N. Surveyor Ave., Simi Valley, California 93063
Meggitt India Private Limited (India)
901, Brigade Rubix, No.20, HMT Main Road, HMT 
Township, Bangalore 560022
Meggitt International Limited3
Meggitt Investments Limited3
Meggitt-Oregon, Inc. (USA)6
2010 Lafayette Avenue, McMinnville, Oregon 97128
Meggitt Properties PLC
Meggitt Queretaro LLC (USA)7
1204 Massillon Road, Akron, Ohio 44306
Meggitt SA (Switzerland)
Route de Moncor 4, 1752 Villars-sur-Glâne
Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. (USA)6
1785 Voyager Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Meggitt-USA Services, Inc. (USA)6
1955 Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Meggitt-USA, Inc. (USA)6
1955 N. Surveyor Ave., Simi Valley, California 93063
Miller Insulation and Engineering Limited 
(Scotland)
125 West Regent Street, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G2 2SA
NASCO Aircraft Brake, Inc. (USA)6
13300 Estrella Avenue, Gardena, California 90248
OECO, LLC (USA)7
4607 SE International Way, Milwaukie, Oregon 97222
Pacific Scientific Company (USA)6
1955 N. Surveyor Ave., Simi Valley, California 93063
Park Chemical Company (USA)6
1955 Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Piher International Limited
Precision Engine Controls Corporation (USA)6
11661 Sorrento Valley Road, San Diego,  
California 92121
Securaplane Technologies, Inc. (USA)6
12350 N. Vistoso Park Road, Oro Valley, Arizona 85755
Serck Aviation Limited
Target Technology Petrel Limited
Tri-scan Limited
Vibro-Meter Limited
Vibro-Meter S.a.r.l (Switzerland)
Route de Moncor 4, 1752 Villars-sur-Glâne
Wallaby Grip (NSW) Ltd (in liquidation) (Australia)
PKF, Level 8, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney, New South 
Wales 2000
Wallaby Grip Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) 
(Australia)
PKF, Level 8, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney, New South 
Wales 2000
Wallaby Grip B.A.E. Ltd (in liquidation) (Australia)
PKF, Level 8, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney, New South 
Wales 2000
45. Related undertakings
In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006, a full list of related undertakings as at 31 December 2021 is disclosed 
below. Unless otherwise stated, undertakings are incorporated in England & Wales, have their registered office at Pilot Way, 
Ansty Business Park, Coventry, England, CV7 9JU, England, and have a single class of ordinary shares with 100% of the equity and 
votings rights owned by the Group. No material subsidiaries have been excluded from the consolidation.
Financial Statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
continued
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
230

45. Related undertakings continued
Subsidiaries – indirectly owned 
continued
Wallaby Grip Industries Australia Pty Ltd  
(in liquidation) (Australia)
PKF, Level 8, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney, New South 
Wales 2000
Wallaby Grip Limited
Whittaker Aerospace
Whittaker Corporation (USA)6
1955 Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Whittaker Development Co. (USA)6
1955 Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Whittaker Ordnance, Inc. (USA)6
1955 N. Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Whittaker Technical Products, Inc. (USA)6
1955 Surveyor Avenue, Simi Valley, California 93063
Zambra Legal Pty Ltd (Australia)
Suite 2, Level 11, 60 Castlereagh Street, Sydney,  
New South Wales 2000
Registered branches
Meggitt (Korea) Limited has a branch in 
South Korea
Meggitt (Xiamen) Sensors & Controls Co., Ltd. 
has a branch in Shanghai
Equity accounted investments 
Meggitt UTC Aerospace Systems, LLC (USA)13
1400 Jamike Avenue, Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
Parkway-Hamilton Sundstrand Mexico S.  
de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)14
Carretera 54 a Zacatecas 5690, Parque Industrial 
Amistad Sur Saltillo, Coahuila 25070
HiETA Technologies Limited11
Entities not included in the 
consolidation 
Private company limited by  
guarantee without share capital
Meggitt Pension Plan Trustees Limited 
Registered charity
Evershed Ayrton Fund
Joint venture
Valley Association Corporation (USA)10
1204 Massillon Road, Akron, Ohio 44306
Notes
1	 Ownership held as ordinary B shares (50%).
2	 Ownership held as quota interest (100%).
3	 Entity has taken the audit exemption under Section 
479A of the Companies Act 2006 for the financial year 
ended 31 December 2021.
4	 Ownership held as deferred shares (55.55%) and 
ordinary shares (44.45%).
5	 Ownership held as ordinary A shares (60%) and 
ordinary B shares (40%).
6	 Ownership held as common stock (100%).
7	 Ownership held as membership interest (100%).
8	 Ownership held as owner’s capital (100%).
9	 Ownership held as registered capital (100%).
10	Ownership held as common stock (33.33%).
11	 Ownership held as ordinary shares (33.33%).
12	 Ownership held as class A common shares (100%).
13	 Ownership held as membership interest (70%).
14	Subsidiary of Meggitt UTC Aerospace Systems which 
holds a quota interest (99.97%).
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
231
Financial Statements

 
Notes
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Non-current assets
Intangible assets
4
25.1
36.1
Property, plant and equipment
5
3.6
0.4
Investments
6
2,082.5
2,078.8
Derivative financial instruments
10
10.1
15.1
Deferred tax assets
 11
20.3
37.8
 
 
2,141.6
2,168.2
Current assets
Other receivables
7
1,481.1
1,451.4
Derivative financial instruments
10
6.4
5.2
Current tax recoverable
–
0.1
Cash and cash equivalents
 
57.2
27.7
 
 
1,544.7
1,484.4
Total assets
 
3,686.3
3,652.6
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
8
(171.6)
(99.0)
Derivative financial instruments
10
(5.4)
(29.2)
Current tax liabilities
(6.9)
(8.4)
Lease liabilities
(0.1)
(0.5)
Bank and other borrowings
9
(7.5)
(7.4)
 
 
(191.5)
(144.5)
Net current assets
 
1,353.2
1,339.9
Non-current liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
10
(3.0)
(6.2)
Lease liabilities
(0.3)
–
Bank and other borrowings
9
(444.1)
(439.0)
Provisions
–
(0.2)
Retirement benefit obligations
12
(59.4)
(186.6)
 
(506.8)
(632.0)
Total liabilities
 
(698.3)
(776.5)
Net assets
 
2,988.0
2,876.1
Equity
Share capital
13
39.1
39.0
Share premium
1,227.8
1,226.6
Capital redemption reserve
1.6
1.6
Other reserves
17.5
17.5
Retained earnings:
  At 1 January
1,591.4
1,460.3
  Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company
31.5
177.0
  Other changes in retained earnings
79.1
(45.9)
Total equity attributable to owners of the Company
2,988.0
2,876.1
The financial statements on pages 232 to 242 were approved by the Board of Directors on 2 March 2022 and signed on its 
behalf by:
A Wood		
	
	
	
L Burdett
Director	 	
	
	
	
Director 
Financial Statements
Company balance sheet
At 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
232

Notes
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Share  
capital 
 
 £’m
Share  
premium 
 
£’m
Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£’m
Other
reserves*
 
£’m
Retained 
earnings 
 
£’m
Total  
equity 
 
 £’m
At 1 January 2020
38.8
1,226.5
1.6
17.5
1,460.3
2,744.7
Profit for the year
–
–
–
–
177.0
177.0
Other comprehensive expense for the year:
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations
12
–
–
–
–
(54.1)
(54.1)
Other comprehensive expense before tax
–
–
–
–
(54.1)
(54.1)
Tax credit
11
–
–
–
–
12.1
12.1
Other comprehensive expense for the year
–
–
–
–
(42.0)
(42.0)
Total comprehensive income for the year
–
–
–
–
135.0
135.0
Employee share schemes:
  Value of subsidiary employee services
–
–
–
–
(3.0)
(3.0)
  Value of services provided
–
–
–
–
(0.6)
(0.6)
  Issue of equity share capital
0.2
0.1
–
–
(0.3)
–
At 31 December 2020
 
39.0
1,226.6
1.6
17.5
1,591.4
2,876.1
Profit for the year
–
–
–
–
31.5
31.5
Other comprehensive income for the year:
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations
12
–
–
–
–
84.3
84.3
Other comprehensive income before tax
–
–
–
–
84.3
84.3
Tax charge
11
–
–
–
–
(15.8)
(15.8)
Other comprehensive income for the year
–
–
–
–
68.5
68.5
Total comprehensive income for the year
–
–
–
–
100.0
100.0
Employee share schemes:
  Value of subsidiary employee services
–
–
–
–
10.0
10.0
  Value of services provided
–
–
–
–
1.9
1.9
  Issue of equity share capital
0.1
1.2
–
–
(1.3)
–
At 31 December 2021
 
39.1
1,227.8
1.6
17.5
1,702.0
2,988.0
*	
Other reserves relate to the cancellation of the Company’s share premium account in 1988, which was transferred to a non-distributable capital reserve.
Company statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
233
Financial Statements

1. Basis of preparation
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101, “Reduced 
Disclosure Framework” (FRS 101). In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, measurement 
and disclosure requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the UK (UK adopted international 
accounting standards), but makes amendments where necessary in order to comply with the Companies Act 2006 and has taken 
advantage of the following disclosure exemptions permitted by FRS 101:
•	 Paragraphs 10(d), 111 and 134–136 of IAS 1 “Presentation of financial statements”.
•	 IAS 7 “Statement of cash flows”.
•	 Paragraph 17 of IAS 24, “Related party disclosures”. 
•	 The requirements in IAS 24 “Related party disclosures to disclose related party transactions entered into between two or more 
members of a group”.
•	 Paragraphs 45(b) and 46–52 of IFRS 2, “Share‑based payment”.
•	 IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”.
The Company has taken advantage of the legal dispensation contained in Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 allowing it not 
to publish a separate income statement and related notes and not to publish a separate statement of comprehensive income.
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of derivative 
financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss, and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. 
In making a judgement as to whether the going concern principle should be adopted, the Directors have considered the period 
starting with the date these financial statements were approved by the Board and ending on 31 March 2023. Further details on the 
considerations made by the Directors are disclosed in note 1 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on pages 176 to 177.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted by the Company in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below.  
These policies have been applied consistently to all years presented unless stated otherwise.
Foreign currencies
The Company’s financial statements are presented in pounds sterling. Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at exchange 
rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities, denominated in foreign currencies are reported 
at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Exchange differences on retranslating monetary assets and liabilities are 
recognised in the income statement. 
Investments
Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses, except for investments acquired before 
1 January 1988 where Section 612 merger relief has been taken and investments are stated at the nominal value of the shares  
issued in consideration, using the deemed cost exemption in IFRS 1 on transition to FRS 101.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets, which comprise software, are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. 
Amortisation is charged on a straight‑line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets, commencing with the date 
the assets are available for use, typically over periods up to five years. Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually and 
adjusted if appropriate.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost includes 
expenditure directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. 
For right‑of‑use assets, cost comprises an amount equal to the initial lease liability recognised, adjusted to include any payments 
made for the right to use the asset, initial direct costs incurred and estimated costs for dismantling, removing and restoring the 
asset at the end of the lease term. 
Depreciation is charged on a straight‑line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets, commencing with the date 
the assets are available for use, as follows:
Right‑of‑use assets
Shorter of the useful economic life of the asset and the lease term
Plant and equipment
3 to 5 years
Motor vehicles
5 years
Residual values and useful lives are reviewed annually and adjusted if appropriate. When items of property, plant and equipment 
are disposed, the difference between sale proceeds, net of related costs, and the carrying value of the asset is recognised in the 
income statement.
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements of the Company
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
234

2. Summary of significant accounting policies continued 
Impairment of non-current, non-financial assets
At each balance sheet date, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its non-current, non-financial assets to determine 
whether there is any indication that those assets are impaired. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is 
estimated in order to determine the extent of any impairment loss. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of 
an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash‑generating unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future 
pre‑tax cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre‑tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of 
the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. 
If the recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or 
CGU is reduced to its recoverable amount.
Any impairment loss is recognised immediately in the income statement. Where an impairment loss is no longer required, it is 
reversed with a corresponding credit to the income statement.
Other receivables
Other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost less any impairment losses.  
The Company applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses (ECLs), which uses a lifetime expected  
loss allowance. To measure ECLs, other receivables have been grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics and their 
ageing. For amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings, which are repayable on demand, ECLs are based on the assumption that 
repayment is demanded at the balance sheet date. The subsidiary undertaking’s access to sufficient accessible highly liquid 
assets in order to repay the amounts due if demanded at the balance sheet date is assessed. The expected manner of recovery is 
considered when measuring ECLs. 
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and deposits held at call with banks. Bank overdrafts are disclosed as current 
liabilities, within bank and other borrowings, except where the Company participates in offset arrangements with certain banks 
whereby cash and overdraft amounts are offset against each other.
Taxation
Current tax is based on taxable profit for the year, calculated using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance  
sheet date.
Deferred tax is provided in full using the liability method on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities  
and their corresponding book values as recognised in the Company’s financial statements. It is calculated using tax rates enacted 
or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent it is probable that 
taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. 
Current tax and deferred tax are recognised in the income statement, other comprehensive income or directly in equity 
depending on where the item to which they relate has been recognised.
Retirement benefit schemes
For the Company’s defined benefit scheme, pension costs are charged to the income statement in accordance with the advice of 
qualified independent actuaries. Past service credits and costs and curtailment gains and losses are recognised immediately in 
the income statement.
Retirement benefit obligations represent the difference between the fair value of the scheme assets and the present value 
of the scheme defined benefit obligations measured at the balance sheet date. The defined benefit obligation is measured 
annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation 
is determined by discounting the defined benefit obligations using interest rates of high quality UK corporate bonds with terms 
to maturity comparable with the terms of the related defined benefit obligations. Where the assets of a scheme exceed its 
liabilities, the surplus recognised is restricted to the lower of this amount and the future economic benefits to which the Company 
has an unconditional right to receive either in the form of reduced contributions or a cash refund. Where the Company has a 
statutory or contractual minimum funding requirement to make contributions to a scheme in respect of past service and any 
such contributions are not available to the Company once paid (as a reduction in future contributions or as a refund, to which the 
Company has an unconditional right either during the life of the scheme or when the scheme liabilities are settled), an additional 
liability for such amounts is recognised.
Remeasurement gains and losses are recognised in the year in which they arise in other comprehensive income. 
For defined contribution schemes, payments are recognised in the income statement when they fall due. The Company has no 
further obligations once the contributions have been paid.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
235
Financial Statements

2. Summary of significant accounting policies continued 
Share‑based compensation
The Company operates a number of share‑based compensation schemes, which are subject to non‑market based vesting 
conditions and are principally equity-settled.
For equity‑settled schemes, at the date of grant, the Company estimates the number of awards expected to vest as a result of  
vesting conditions and the fair value of this estimated number of awards is recognised as an expense in the income statement on  
a straight‑line basis over the period for which services are received. At each balance sheet date, the Company revises its estimate 
of the number of awards expected to vest and adjusts the amount recognised cumulatively in the income statement to reflect 
the revised estimate. When awards are exercised and the Company issues new shares, the proceeds received, net of any directly 
attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium.
The grant by the Company of options over its equity instruments to employees of subsidiary undertakings, is treated as a capital 
contribution. The fair value of the awards made is recognised, over the vesting period, as an increase in investment in subsidiary 
undertakings, with a corresponding credit to retained earnings.
Derivative financial instruments and hedging
Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are 
subsequently measured at fair value at each balance sheet date using values determined indirectly from quoted prices that are 
observable for the asset or liability. 
To the extent the maturity of the derivative financial instruments are more than 12 months from the balance sheet date, they are 
classified as non‑current assets or non‑current liabilities. All other derivative financial instruments are classified as current assets or 
current liabilities. 
The Company utilises a large number of foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate against currency fluctuations. The Company has 
determined that the additional costs of meeting the extensive documentation requirements in order to apply hedge accounting under 
IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” are not merited. Therefore changes in fair value are recognised immediately in the income statement. 
Borrowings
Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, being proceeds received less directly attributable transaction costs incurred. 
Borrowings are generally subsequently held at amortised cost at each balance sheet date with any transaction costs amortised to 
the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. 
Any related interest accruals are included within borrowings. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Company 
has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
Share capital 
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are deducted from the 
proceeds recorded in equity. 
Own shares represent shares in the Company that are held by an independently managed Employee Share Ownership Plan. 
Consideration paid for own shares, including any incremental directly attributable costs, is recorded as a deduction from retained 
earnings. Details of own shares in the Company are disclosed in note 39 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
Dividends
Interim dividends are recognised when paid to shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when approved by the shareholders. 
Details of dividends paid and proposed by the Company are disclosed in note 15 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
Adoption of new and revised accounting standards
Phase 2 amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 for interest rate benchmark (IBOR) reform became effective in the 
year. The effect of these amendments on the Company’s committed syndicated credit facility and interest rate swaps is disclosed in 
note 2 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on page 187. 
In addition, some of the Company’s intercompany loan agreements which are used to manage liquidity between the UK and 
overseas subsidiaries referenced LIBORs at 31 December 2020. For GBP, CHF, EUR and USD loans, these have been amended 
in the year to reference SONIA, SARON, EURIBOR and SOFR respectively. For GBP, CHF and EUR loans the rate switch date is 
specified as 31 December 2021, for USD loans the rate switch date is to be a date to be agreed between the parties with a long 
stop date of 30 June 2023. 
No other accounting standards, amendments or revisions to existing standards, or interpretations have become effective or 
have been published as mandatory for future accounting periods which had or will have a significant effect on the Company’s 
financial statements.
Notes to the financial statements of the Company
continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
236

3. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
In applying the Company’s accounting policies set out in note 2, the Company is required to make certain estimates and 
judgements concerning the future. These estimates and judgements are regularly reviewed and revised as necessary. 
The estimates and judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts included in the financial statements are 
described below. 
Critical accounting estimates
Retirement benefit obligations
The liability recognised in respect of retirement benefit obligations is dependent on a number of estimates including those 
relating to mortality, inflation and the rate at which liabilities are discounted. External actuarial advice is taken with regard to the 
most appropriate assumptions to use. Further details on these estimates, and sensitivities of the retirement benefit obligations to 
these estimates, are disclosed in note 12.
Critical accounting judgements
There are no critical judgements for the current year. The Company previously disclosed in its 2020 Annual Report, a critical 
accounting judgement relating to the Directors’ assessment that the adoption of the going concern basis in the financial statements 
was appropriate. For the reasons set out in note 1, to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on pages 176 to 177, this is no 
longer considered a critical judgment for the current year.
4. Intangible assets
 
Software 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
Cost
89.4
Accumulated amortisation
(46.0)
Net book amount
43.4
Year ended 31 December 2020
Opening net book amount
43.4
Additions
2.9
Disposals
(0.3)
Amortisation
(9.9)
Net book amount
36.1
At 1 January 2021
Cost
92.0
Accumulated amortisation
(55.9)
Net book amount
36.1
Year ended 31 December 2021
Opening net book amount
36.1
Additions
3.6
Disposals
(2.8)
Amortisation
(9.8)
Impairment losses
(2.0)
Net book amount
25.1
At 31 December 2021
Cost
95.1
Accumulated amortisation
(70.0)
Net book amount
25.1
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
237
Financial Statements

5. Property, plant and equipment
 
2021
2020
Plant, 
equipment 
and vehicles
 
£’m
Other
 
£’m
Total 
 
 
£’m
Plant, 
equipment and 
vehicles
 
£’m
Other 
 
£’m
Total 
 
 
£’m
Cost
9.5
1.5
11.0
6.2
1.9
8.1
Accumulated depreciation
(6.3)
(1.1)
(7.4)
(6.2)
(1.5)
(7.7)
Net book amount
3.2
0.4
3.6
–
0.4
0.4
6. Investments
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Shares in subsidiary undertakings:
At 1 January
2,078.8
2,082.7
Contributions to/(from) subsidiary undertakings 
3.7
(3.9)
At 31 December
2,082.5
2,078.8
Each year, the Company carries out impairment tests of its investments which require estimates to be made of the value in use 
of its CGUs and groups of CGUs. The value‑in‑use calculations are dependent on estimates of future cash flows, long-term 
growth rates and appropriate discount rates to be applied to future cash flows. Having modelled a number of sensitivities, it 
was concluded that no reasonably foreseeable change in the key assumptions used in the impairment model would result in a 
significant impairment charge being recorded in the financial statements. 
A list of all subsidiary undertakings is disclosed in note 45 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on pages 230 to 231.
7. Other receivables
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings
1,478.4
1,450.8
Prepayments
1.6
0.4
Other
1.1
0.2
Total
1,481.1
1,451.4
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings are unsecured and are stated net of amounts due to subsidiary undertakings, where a 
right of set off exists. Within amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings are amounts totalling £1,401.2m (2020: £1,358.3m) which 
are interest bearing, have no fixed date for repayment and are repayable on demand. 
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings are stated net of a loss allowance of £1.7m (2020: £1.7m). Each year, the Company 
performs an assessment of recoverability of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings in accordance with IFRS 9 requirements. 
The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of a material adjustment to the loss allowance recognised in respect of 
these receivables in the next 12 months. 
8. Trade and other payables – current
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Trade payables
1.3
1.7
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings
157.2
90.6
Social security and other taxes
2.3
0.5
Accrued expenses
5.6
4.1
Other payables
5.2
2.1
Total
171.6
99.0
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings are unsecured, non-interest bearing, have no fixed date for repayment and are 
repayable on demand. 
Notes to the financial statements of the Company
continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
238

9. Bank and other borrowings
 
2021
£’m
2020
£’m
Other loans – current
7.5
7.4
Bank loans – debt costs non‑current
(0.9)
–
Other loans – non‑current
445.0
439.0
Total
451.6
446.4
Analysis of bank and other borrowings repayable:
In one year or less
7.5
7.4
In more than one year but not more than five years
444.1
219.5
In more than five years
–
219.5
Total
451.6
446.4
Analysis of bank and other borrowings:
Drawn under committed facilities
445.4
439.5
Less unamortised debt issue costs
(1.3)
(0.5)
Interest accruals
7.5
7.4
Total
451.6
446.4
Debt issue costs are amortised over the period of the facility to which they relate. The Company has no secured borrowings 
(2020: £Nil).
The Company has the following committed facilities at notional value:
 
2021
2020 (restated)*
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
Drawn 
£’m
Undrawn 
£’m
Total 
£’m
Syndicated credit facility: USD410.0m (2020: USD750.0m)
–
304.4
304.4
–
549.4
549.4
2016 Senior notes: USD600.0m
445.4
–
445.4
439.5
–
439.5
Committed facilities
445.4
304.4
749.8
439.5
549.4
988.9
The committed facilities expire as follows:
In more than one year but not more than five years
445.4
304.4
749.8
219.8
549.4
769.2
In more than five years
–
–
–
219.7
–
219.7
Committed facilities
445.4
304.4
749.8
439.5
549.4
988.9
*	
 Prior year figures have been restated to incorporate the undrawn USD750.0m syndicated credit facility, under which the Company was an eligible borrower at 
31 December 2020. 
Further details of the committed facilities are disclosed in note 31 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on pages 211 
to 213. 
The Company also has various uncommitted facilities with its relationship banks. No amounts had been drawn under these 
facilities at 31 December 2021 (2020: £Nil).
The fair value of bank and other borrowings is as follows:
 
2021
2020
Book  
 value 
£’m
Fair  
 value 
£’m
Book  
 value 
£’m
Fair  
 value 
£’m
Current
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.4
Non‑current
444.1
443.4
439.0
452.7
Total
451.6
450.9
446.4
460.1
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
239
Financial Statements

9. Bank and other borrowings continued 
All borrowings are subject to interest at fixed rates. The interest rate exposure on bank and other borrowings is: 
2021
2020
Total 
 
 
 
 
£’m
Weighted 
average 
interest 
rate 
%
Weighted 
average 
period 
for which 
rate is fixed 
Years
Total 
 
 
 
 
£’m
Weighted 
average 
interest 
rate 
 
%
Weighted 
average 
period 
for which 
rate is fixed 
Years
US dollar denominated other loans
452.9
3.5%
3.0
446.9
3.5
4.0
Less unamortised debt issue costs
(1.3)
(0.5)
Bank and other borrowings
451.6
446.4
The weighted average interest rate reflects the relative impact of interest rates based on the principal amounts and the duration  
of borrowings. 
10. Derivative financial instruments
2021
2020
 
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Interest rate swaps
1.7
–
–
–
Cross-currency swaps 
–
(1.1)
–
(20.0)
Foreign currency forward contracts
4.7
(4.3)
5.2
(9.2)
Current portion
6.4
(5.4)
5.2
(29.2)
Interest rate swaps 
–
–
5.1
–
Cross-currency swaps
6.5
–
–
–
Foreign currency forward contracts 
3.6
(3.0)
10.0
(6.2)
Non‑current portion
10.1
(3.0)
15.1
(6.2)
Total
16.5
(8.4)
20.3
(35.4)
The Company does not use hedge accounting for any of its derivative financial instruments. It is exempt from certain FRS 101 
disclosures as the Group’s consolidated financial statements provide the disclosures required by IFRS 7 (see note 33 to the Group’s 
consolidated financial statements on pages 216 to 217).
The gain recorded in the income statement, recognised in net operating costs, arising from the measurement at fair value of 
derivative financial instruments, is £23.0m (2020: loss £7.3m).
The contract or underlying principal amount of foreign currency forward contracts in respect of derivative financial assets is 
£233.6m (2020: £443.1m) and in respect of derivative financial liabilities is £220.6m (2020: £362.1m).
The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is analysed as follows:
2021
2020
 
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
Assets 
£’m
Liabilities 
£’m
US dollar forward sales and purchases (USD/£)
7.8
(6.2)
13.0
(11.2)
Forward sales and purchases denominated in other currencies
0.5
(0.9)
2.2
(4.2)
Fair value
8.3
(7.1)
15.2
(15.4)
11. Deferred tax
Deferred tax assets are analysed as follows:
 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
To be recovered within one year
16.3
6.8
To be recovered after more than one year
4.0
31.0
Total
20.3
37.8
Notes to the financial statements of the Company
continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
240

11. Deferred tax continued
Movements in deferred tax assets during the year are as follows:
Assets
Retirement 
benefit 
obligations 
£’m
Other 
 
 
£’m
Total 
£’m
At 1 January 2020
25.8
1.6
27.4
Charge to income statement
(2.4)
(0.7)
(3.1)
Credit to other comprehensive income
12.1
–
12.1
Credit to equity
–
1.4
1.4
At 31 December 2020
35.5
2.3
37.8
(Charge)/credit to income statement
(8.0)
5.0
(3.0)
Charge to other comprehensive income
(15.8)
–
(15.8)
Credit to equity
–
1.3
1.3
At 31 December 2021
11.7
8.6
20.3
There are no unremitted earnings in foreign subsidiaries that would give rise to a tax liability in the event of those subsidiaries 
remitting their earnings.
12. Retirement benefit obligations
The Company is the sponsoring employer of the Meggitt Pension Plan, a funded defined benefit plan. Each participating company 
in the Meggitt Pension Plan bears employer contributions in respect of future service. No other amounts are recharged by the 
Company to any other participating employer. The Company has recognised the total deficit in respect of the Meggitt Pension 
Plan in these financial statements. Further details on the plan are disclosed in note 36 to the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements on pages 221 to 226 in respect of the UK scheme.
The total charge to net operating expenses in respect of the defined contribution scheme in which employees of the Company 
participate is £2.6m (2020: £2.0m). 
Changes in the present value of retirement benefit obligations are as follows:
 
2021
2020
Liabilities*
£’m
Assets**
£’m
Total 
£’m
Liabilities*
£’m
Assets**
£’m
Total 
£’m
At 1 January
961.1
(774.5)
186.6
855.7
(705.1)
150.6
Service cost
1.9
–
1.9
7.8
–
7.8
Past service cost
–
–
–
0.1
–
0.1
Curtailment gain
(8.0)
–
(8.0)
–
–
–
Net interest cost
16.6
(14.4)
2.2
17.3
(14.6)
2.7
Contributions – Company
–
(39.9)
(39.9)
–
(29.6)
(29.6)
Benefits paid
(30.9)
30.9
–
(29.5)
29.5
–
Administrative expenses borne directly by scheme
–
0.9
0.9
–
0.9
0.9
Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations:
  Experience gain
(13.5)
–
(13.5)
–
–
–
  Gain from change in demographic assumptions 
(4.5)
–
(4.5)
(1.6)
–
(1.6)
  (Gain)/loss from change in financial assumptions 
(23.4)
–
(23.4)
111.3
–
111.3
  Return on scheme assets excluding amounts included in 
finance costs
–
(42.9)
(42.9)
–
(55.6)
(55.6)
Total remeasurement (gain)/loss
(41.4)
(42.9)
(84.3)
109.7
(55.6)
54.1
At 31 December
899.3
(839.9)
59.4
961.1
(774.5)
186.6
*	
Present value of scheme liabilities.
**	
Fair value of scheme assets.
Details on the sensitivity of scheme liabilities to changes in assumptions are provided below:
•	 The impact of either a 50 basis point reduction or increase in discount rate would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 2021 
to either increase by approximately £86.0m or decrease by approximately £76.0m respectively.
•	 The impact of a 50 basis point increase in inflation rates would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 2021 to increase by 
approximately £48.0m.
•	 The impact of assuming every scheme member were to live for an additional year would cause scheme liabilities at 31 December 
2021 to increase by approximately £35.0m.
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
241
Financial Statements

12. Retirement benefit obligations continued
Sensitivity analyses are based on a change in a single assumption while keeping all other assumptions constant. In practice, this is 
unlikely to occur, and changes in assumptions may be correlated. When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation 
to significant actuarial assumptions, the same method of calculating the defined benefit obligation has been used as when 
calculating the retirement benefit obligations recognised on the balance sheet. The methods and types of assumptions used in 
preparing the sensitivity analysis are consistent with the previous year. The sensitivity for inflation has been increased from 10 basis 
points in 2020 to 50 basis points in 2021, given the increases experienced in the current year. No changes have been considered 
necessary to any other sensitivity levels.
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation is 18.7 years. The expected maturity of undiscounted pension 
benefits at 31 December 2021 is as follows:
Total
£’m
To be made in 2022
24.4
To be made in 2023 
25.4
To be made in 2024 to 2026
82.6
To be made in 2027 to 2031
161.0
To be made in 2032 to 2036
180.0
To be made in 2037 to 2041
181.2
To be made in 2042 to 2046
170.2
To be made from 2047 onwards
458.0
Total
1,282.8
13. Share capital
Disclosures in respect of share capital of the Company are provided in note 37 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on 
page 226.
14. Share‑based payment
Share awards have been granted to employees of the Company under various plans. Details of the general terms and conditions 
of each share‑based payment plan are provided in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 126 to 155. Disclosure is also made 
in the Group’s consolidated financial statements in note 38 on pages 226 to 227.
15. Commitments and contingencies
The Company has no capital commitments (2020: Nil). Details of contingent liabilities impacting the Company are disclosed in 
note 41 to the Group’s consolidated financial statements on page 228.
16. Other information
Directors’ remuneration
Details of the remuneration paid to Directors of the Company are provided in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 126 
to 155.
Auditors’ remuneration
Remuneration payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of the Company was £29,800 (2020: £27,000).
Employee information
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
Wages and salaries
26.3
21.0
Social security costs
4.6
4.2
Retirement benefit (credit)/expense
(3.5)
9.9
Share‑based payment expense/(credit)
1.9
(0.6)
Employee costs including Executive Directors
29.3
34.5
The average number of persons employed by the Company in the year was 327 (2020: 278). 
Notes to the financial statements of the Company
continued
Financial Statements
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
242

 
2021 
£’m
2020 
£’m
2019 
£’m
2018 
£’m
2017 
£’m
Revenue and profit
Revenue
1,489.2
1,684.1
2,276.2
2,080.6
1,994.4
Underlying profit before tax
149.3
159.5
370.3
334.8
320.2
Amounts arising on the acquisition, disposal and closure of businesses
(7.3)
32.0
23.5
25.1
25.3
Amortisation of intangible assets acquired in business combinations
(80.1)
(88.2)
(89.8)
(91.5)
(93.5)
Financial instruments
16.7
(2.9)
15.0
(10.1)
60.7
Exceptional operating items
(43.2)
(428.7)
(26.2)
(34.2)
(73.1)
Net interest expense on retirement benefit obligations 
(4.1)
(5.7)
(6.1)
(8.0)
(11.3)
(Loss)/profit before tax
31.3
(334.0)
286.7
216.1
228.3
Earnings and dividends
(Loss)/earnings per share – basic
4.0p
(40.4)p
28.8p
23.2p
37.8p
Earnings per share – underlying
15.4p
16.5p
37.3p
34.2p
32.0p
Dividends per ordinary share in respect of the year
–
–
5.55p
16.65p
15.85p
Gearing ratio
Net debt as a percentage of total equity
36.1%
38.0%
37.1%
43.1%
45.9%
Five-year record
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
243
Other Information

Contacts
Investor relations
E: investors@meggitt.com
Information on Meggitt PLC, including the latest share price: www.meggitt.com
Shareholder enquiries
Registrar: 
Computershare Investor  
Services PLC  
The Pavilions  
Bridgwater Road  
Bristol BS99 6ZZ
T: 0370 703 6210  
W: www.investorcentre.co.uk/
contactus
Enquiries about the following matters should be addressed to Meggitt PLC’s registrar: 
•	 Change of address notification.
•	 Lost share certificates.
•	 Dividend payment enquiries.
•	 Dividend mandate instructions. Shareholders may have their dividends paid directly 
into their bank or building society accounts by completing a dividend mandate 
form. Dividend confirmations are sent directly to shareholders’ registered addresses. 
Quarterly statements will be available online at www.investorcentre.co.uk. Shareholders will 
need their Shareholder Reference Number (SRN) and registered address details to get started. 
Statements will be available from 30 April, 31 July, 31 October and 31 January each year.
•	 Amalgamation of shareholdings. Shareholders who receive more than one copy of the Annual 
Report are invited to amalgamate their accounts on the share register.
Shareholders can view and manage their shareholdings online at www.investorcentre.co.uk, 
including updating address records, making dividend payment enquiries, updating dividend 
mandates and viewing the latest share price. Shareholders will need their Shareholder Reference 
Number, which can be found on their share certificate or a recent dividend tax voucher or dividend 
confirmation, to access this site. Once signed up to Investor Centre, an activation code may be sent 
to the shareholder’s registered address to enable the shareholder to manage their holding.
Other useful contacts
Share dealing services are provided for shareholders by Computershare Investor Services PLC. 
These services are provided online, to access these services shareholders should have their SRN 
and log onto www.computershare.com/dealing/uk.
ShareGift (www.sharegift.org, registered charity number 1052686): PO Box 72253, London, SW1P 
9LQ (0207 930 3737). ShareGift, the independent share donation charity, is especially useful for 
those who may want to dispose of a small number of shares which are uneconomic to sell on their 
own. Shares which have been donated to ShareGift are aggregated and sold when practicable, with 
the proceeds passed on to a wide range of UK registered charities. 
Other Information
Investor information
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
244

FAQs on the impact of the proposed acquisition of Meggitt by Parker-Hannifin
How will the proposed
acquisition affect the
ordinary shares I hold
in Meggitt?
On completion of the acquisition, all Meggitt share certificates will become invalid and should 
be destroyed. 
Shareholders will automatically receive payment for their shares, by cheque or direct into their 
bank account if the distribution payment is £250,000 or more (bank details must be registered with 
Computershare for direct payments). 
Alternatively, shareholders who hold their shares in Crest will receive their payment electronically 
directly through the Crest payment system.
I have lost my share 
certificate, do I need to 
get a new one before the 
acquisition completes?
No. On completion shareholders will automatically receive payment for their Meggitt shares. 
Shareholders only need to obtain a new share certificate if they are planning to sell or transfer the 
shares to someone else before the acquisition completes. 
When will payment 
be made? 
Completion is currently expected to occur in Q3 2022 and payment is expected approximately 
14 days from the effective date.
If shareholders do not receive payment within 14 days from completion they should contact 
Computershare on 0370 703 6210.
Do I need to take 
any action?
Yes.
1.	Shareholders should ensure that their details registered with Computershare are accurate and 
up-to-date.
–	 Shareholders can update their details online at www.investorcentre.co.uk. To access this site 
shareholders will need their Shareholder Reference Number which can be found on their share 
certificate or a recent dividend confirmation voucher. Alternatively they can call Computershare 
on 0370 703 6210.
–	 Shareholders who will receive a distribution payment of £250,000 or more will need to provide 
consent for Computershare to use their bank details to make the payment. Computershare will 
contact affected shareholders separately to obtain consent.
2.	Capital gains taxes could accrue in certain jurisdictions between the value of the shares when 
originally purchased/exercised an award and the value of the shares when Parker-Hannifin buys 
them. For capital gains purposes, shareholders should check their records of all transactions in 
Meggitt shares to make sure they can calculate any capital gains tax due. This is a personal tax 
liability and Meggitt cannot make this calculation for you.
Shareholders should seek independent financial advice if they are unsure as to their tax position. 
Meggitt is not authorised to provide tax advice in any form. 
I’m an overseas 
shareholder, will I get 
a cheque in GBP?
Yes, shareholders will receive a cheque in GBP or payment direct into their bank account if 
the distribution payment is £250,000 or more (and if their bank details have been registered 
with Computershare).  
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
245
Other Information

Other Information
401(k)	
An employer-sponsored defined-
contribution pension in the 
United States
ADS	
Aerospace, Defence, Security and  
Space Organisation
Aftermarket (AM)	
Spares and repairs
AGM	
Annual General Meeting
AR&T	
Applied research and technology
ASK 	
Available seat kilometres
AOG	
Aircraft on ground
BAME	
Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic
Basis point	
One-hundredth of a percent
Board 	
Board of Directors
Book to bill	
The ratio of orders received to revenue 
recognised in a period
BSI 	
British Standards Institution
Business jets	
Aircraft used for non-commercial 
operations
CAA 	
Civil Aviation Authority
CAGR	
Compound annual growth rate
Capability 	
Expertise in technology and 
manufacturing
CARES act	
Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic 
Security act
CFC	
Controlled Foreign Company
CGU 	
Cash-generating unit
CHF 	
Swiss franc
CI	
Continuous improvement
CO2 	
Carbon dioxide
2018 Code 	
UK Corporate Governance Code 2018
CODM 	
Chief operating decision maker
Company 	
Meggitt PLC
Condition‑monitoring	
Monitoring the condition of aerospace 
and land‑based turbines and 
supporting equipment to predict wear 
and tear, promoting safety, up‑time and 
planned maintenance
Continuing Resolution	
Appropriations legislation restricting 
modification from prior‑year funding 
patterns
CR	
Corporate Responsibility
CREST	
Certificateless Registry for Electronic 
Share Transfer
D&A	
Depreciation and amortisation
DECC	
Department of Energy & Climate 
Change
DEFRA 	
Department for Environment, Food & 
Rural Affairs
DFARS	
(US) Defense Federal Acquisition 
Relation Supplement
DLA	
Daily layered accountability, the 
nervous system of Meggitt’s High 
Performance System, DLA is a  
multi‑layered structure of interlocking 
meetings at the start of each working 
day that flows fresh, accurate 
performance and operational 
information up and down the business 
enabling problems to be solved quickly 
by those best equipped to do so
DoD 	
(United States) Department of Defense
DPPM	
Defective parts per million, a measure  
of quality
DRIP 	
Dividend reinvestment plan
DGTR	
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency 
Rules
EBITA	
Earnings Before Interest, Tax 
and Amortisation
EBITDA	
Earnings Before Interest, Tax, 
Depreciation and Amortisation
E&C	
Ethics & Compliance
ECR	
(US) Export Controls Reform
ECL	
Expected Credit Loss
EPS	
Earnings per Share
ERG	
Employee Resource Group
ESG	
Environment, Social & Governance
ETES 	
Electro-thermal Energy Storage
EU 	
European Union
eVTOL 	
Electric vertical take-off and landing
Executive Committee	
Assists the Chief Executive to develop 
and implement the Group’s strategy, 
manage operations and discharge 
responsibilities delegated by the Board
FCA	
Financial Conduct Authority
FIFO 	
First‑in first‑out
FIRST	
For Inspiration and Recognition of 
Science and Technology 
FOC	
Free of charge
FVLCOD 	
Fair Value Less Cost of Disposal
FRC 	
Financial Reporting Council
FRS 	
Financial Reporting Standard
FTSE	
Share index of companies listed on the 
London Stock Exchange
GAAP	
Generally Accepted Accounting 
Practice
GBP 	
British pound or pound sterling 
GDP 	
Gross domestic product
GDPR 	
General Data Protection Regulation
GHG 	
Greenhouse gas
Group 	
Meggitt PLC and its subsidiaries
HMRC 	
HM Revenue & Customs
HSE	
Health, Safety & Environment
HPC	
High Performance Culture (HPC) – our 
chosen culture, with a particular focus 
on diversity & inclusion and improved 
employee engagement, to accelerate 
execution of our strategy
HPS	
High Performance System (HPS) –  
our new Emerging Stronger plan for 	
Outstanding Operations, which 	
replaced the Meggitt Production  
System (MPS) in 2021
IAS 	
International Accounting Standards
IATA 	
The International Air Transport 
Association
IBOR 	
Inter Bank Offered Rate
IET	
Institution of Engineering and 
Technology
IFBEC	
International Forum on Business Ethical 
Conduct
Glossary
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
246

IFRS	
International Financial Reporting 
Standards
Installed base	
The sum total of the Meggitt products 
and sub‑systems installed on 
customers’ equipment
IR	
Investor Relations
IP	
Intellectual property
ISA 	
International Standards on Auditing
Jet Zero Council (JZC)	
Partnership between industry and 
government bringing together 
ministers and chief executive officer-
level stakeholders to drive the 
ambitious delivery of new technologies 
and innovative ways to cut aviation 
emissions
KPI 	
Key performance indicator
Large jets	
Commercial aircraft with greater than 
100 seats
Lean	
A method for the continual elimination 
of waste within a manufacturing system
LIBOR 	
London Inter‑Bank Offered Rate
LNG 	
Liquefied Natural Gas
LTIP 	
Long-Term Incentive Plan
M&A	
Mergers and acquisitions
MPS	
Meggitt Production System (MPS) – 
Replaced by our High Performance 
System in 2021
Mix	
The impact on performance of 
revenue streams with higher or lower 
profitability growing at differing rates
MoD 	
UK Ministry of Defence 
MPP	
Meggitt Pension Plan
MRO 	
Maintenance, repair and overhaul
NBAA 	
National Business Aviation Association
Net borrowings	
Net debt adjusted to exclude lease 
liabilities
NHS	
National health Service
NPI	
New product introduction
O&M	
Operations and monitoring
OE 	
Original equipment
OECD 	
Organisation for Economic 
Cooperation and Development
OEM 	
Original equipment manufacturer
Operations excellence	
A system of tools and processes that 
embraces the way in which every 
aspect of Meggitt is managed from the 
factory floor to all functions and every 
level of leadership from supervisors to 
the Group Executive Committee
Organic growth 	
Growth excluding the impact of 
currency and acquisitions and disposals 
of businesses
OSHA	
Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration
OTD	
On‑time delivery
PBT	
Profit before tax
PCHE	
Printed circuit heat exchanger – a block 
of flat, diffusion bonded plates on to 
which fluid flow channels have been 
chemically milled
PFEP	
Plan for every part
Platform 	
Aircraft or ground vehicle model 
incorporating Meggitt products 
PMO	
Project management office
PPC	
Programme Participation Cost
Programme 	
The production and utilisation lifecycle 
of an aircraft model or ground vehicle
PwC	
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
RDT&E 	
Research Development Test and 
Evaluation
R&D 	
Research and development
RCF 	
Revolving Credit Facility
REACH 	
Registration, Evaluation and 
Authorisation of Chemicals
RECs	
Renewable Energy Credits
Regional aircraft 	
Commercial aircraft with fewer than  
100 seats
Registrar 	
Computershare Investor Services PLC
RIDDOR	
The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and 
Dangerous Occurrences Regulations
RMU	
Retrofit, modification and upgrade
RNS	
Regulatory News Service 
announcement
ROCE	
Return on capital employed
ROTA	
Return on trading assets
RPH	
Retirement Plan Headcount
RPK	
Revenue Passenger Kilometers
SAP	
The Group’s selected enterprise 
management system
SAF	
Sustainable Aviation Fuels
Sell-side	
Refers to the part of the financial 
industry that is involved in the creation, 
promotion, and sale of stocks, bonds, 
foreign exchange, and other financial 
instruments
Shipset	
Value of Meggitt’s content on  
aircraft platforms
SIP 	
Share Incentive Plan
SOC 	
Service Organisation Control
SRN 	
Shareholder Reference Number
STIP 	
Short-Term Incentive Plan
TCFD	
Taskforce on Climate-related Financial 
Disclosures
TRIR	
Total recordable injury rate
TSR 	
Total shareholder return
UAV 	
Unmanned aerial vehicle
UN SDG	
United Nations Sustainable 
Development Goals
UKLA	
UK Listing Authority
USD 	
United States dollar
Ventilator Challenge 	
A consortium led rapid production of 
ventilators to help patients hospitalised 
with COVID-19
WACC 	
Weighted average cost of capital
WBCSD	
World Business Council for Sustainable 
Development
WIP	
Work in Progress
WRI	
World Resources Institute
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
247
Other Information

Notes
Meggitt PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2021
248

Designed and produced by Radley Yeldar www.ry.com
This annual report is printed on Chorus Silk. The manufacturers of Chorus Silk hold ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 certifications and 
are also FSC & PEFC certified. This report is printed by Pureprint is a CarbonNeutral® company. Both manufacturing mill and 
the printer are registered to the Environmental Management System ISO 14001 and are Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) 
chain-of-custody certified. If you have finished reading the report and no longer wish to retain it, please pass it on to other 
interested readers or dispose of it in your recycled paper waste.

Meggitt PLC
Ansty Business Park
Pilot Way
Coventry
CV7 9JU
United Kingdom
T +44 (0)24 7682 6900
www.meggitt.com
Registered in England and Wales
Company number 432989