More annual reports from Mount Gibson Iron Limited:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Mount Gibson Iron Limited:
Peabody EnergyM
o
u
n
t
G
i
b
s
o
n
i
r
o
n
L
i
M
i
t
E
D
2
0
1
3
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
2013 ANNUAL REPORT
2012/13 Performance Summary
Operational Highlights
Financial Highlights
Chairman’s Report
Chief Executive Officer’s Report
Operational Review
Koolan Island
Mid West
Exploration
Health and Safety, Environment, Community Affairs
Health and Safety
Environment
Community Affairs
Resources and Reserves Statement
Financial Statements
Corporate Directory
2
2
3
4
6
8
8
11
12
14
15
16
18
20
21
105
Mount Gibson Iron Limited is an Australian “pure play”
iron ore producer and an established force in the bulk
commodities sector. The Company was incorporated in
Perth in 1996 and was listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange in 2002.
Mount Gibson owns and operates three hematite iron ore
mines in Western Australia – the Koolan Island mine off the
Kimberley coast in the remote north-west of the State, while
in the Mid West region there is the Extension Hill mine in the
Mt Gibson range south-east of Geraldton, and the Tallering
Peak mine, east of Geraldton.
Mount Gibson seeks to optimise the returns from its existing
operations and grow long-term profitability through the
discovery, development, participation and/or acquisition of
mineral resources.
As an established exporter of direct shipping hematite ore,
Mount Gibson has a clearly defined operating strategy to
operate as a successful Australian supplier of raw materials
to the global carbon steel market, providing sustainable,
long-term returns to shareholders.
Extension Hill Crusher Superintendent Chris Farrall
tHE MGX WAY
To succeed we do the essential things well.
Our Values guide us in working the MGX Way by defining the behaviours expected of all employees.
Courage
Integrity
Safety
Agility
Respect
Taking and giving
feedback
Do what you say
you will do
Genuine care for
self and others
Make timely decisions
Be prepared to
admit being wrong
Do the right thing,
even when no
one is looking
Constant concern
(hazard identification)
Be dynamic and
embrace change
Be approachable
and open to other
points of view
Treat others as
you would expect
to be treated
Challenge the norm
constructively
“Walk the talk”
Actively intervene
to improve
Grab the opportunity
Encourage and
develop people
Make the
hard calls
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
1
2012/13
PErforMAncE
suMMArY
OPERATiONAL HigHLigHTs
Record ore sales of 8.8 million tonnes
Total ore mined of 5.8 million tonnes
Record 7.7 million tonnes of ore
crushed
Record Mid West ore sales of
5.3 million tonnes
Increased Koolan Island sales of
3.5 million tonnes
Koolan Island mine optimisation
completed and production ramp-up
to 4 million tonnes commenced
Tallering Peak mine life extended
after approval of T1 mining proposal
RECORD ORE SALES
8.8Mt
2
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
RECORD SALES REvEnuE
$853M
FiNANciAL HigHLigHTs
Record sales revenue of $852.9 million
Net profit after tax of $157.3 million
Underlying net profit after tax of
$92.9 million, excluding MRRT tax credit
Total fully franked dividends of
4.0 cents per share
Cash and term deposits at 30 June 2013
increased to $376 million
Significant savings delivered through
ongoing cost reduction program
Minimal debt
Net assets of $1,182 million
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
3
cHAirMAn’s rEPort
With difficult trading
conditions in the first half,
Mount Gibson achieved
significant improvement in
its underlying business. The
transformation during the year
under our new management
team has created a robust
platform to build long-term
value for all shareholders.
Building our existing business
remained a key strategic
focus. After completing the
rebuilding of our management
team with senior appointments
at the start of the year, we
focused on extracting the
most from our existing
resource assets, optimising
costs, and maintaining our
strong balance sheet.
uP28%
TOTAL CASH RESERvES
4
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
The Company delivered a reasonable
performance in extremely volatile market
conditions, especially given the first half
when commodity prices fell sharply.
At Tallering Peak, which was previously
expected to close in mid-2013, the
delineation of the T1 deposit has helped
add another year of high value production.
And at Extension Hill, we are extremely
excited about the exploration potential to
add resources to the south of the current pit.
Similarly, our acquisition of the Field’s Find
exploration tenements north of Extension
Hill highlights our strategy of expanding
our footprint within reach of our current
operations and infrastructure.
I would like to record my appreciation
of the efforts of my fellow Directors
and acknowledge the assistance of
Mr Lee Seng Hui who was appointed
Non-Executive Deputy Chairman during
the year. Mr Lee has been a Non-Executive
Director of Mount Gibson since 2010 and
plays an important role in our relationships
with China.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to
thank our employees for their dedication
and contribution to the results that we
have collectively achieved for Mount
Gibson’s shareholders during the year.
Geoffrey Hill
Chairman
For the year, Mount Gibson reported
record sales volumes of 8.8 million tonnes
and revenue of $852.9 million, trebled
operating cash flow to $179.7 million and
increased total cash reserves by 28% to
$376 million, with little debt. Net profit after
tax of $157.3 million was a strong result in
the volatile conditions. This profit included
a non-cash tax accounting credit of
$64.5 million relating to the Mineral
Resource Rent Tax.
We are targeting higher sales volumes
in 2014 and further permanent cost
reductions in addition to the $50 million
of permanent savings captured in the year
just completed.
On the back of this strong performance,
the Board was pleased to reward
shareholders by maintaining our record
of dividend payments with a fully franked
distribution of 4.0 cents per share for the
year. The 2013 distribution takes total
dividends declared to approximately
$130 million since September 2011.
While we do not have a formal dividend
policy, the view of the Board remains that
shareholders should be rewarded when
the Company is performing well, and can
afford to do so.
I am pleased to note the Company made
significant gains in adding value to its
existing business during the year.
At Koolan Island, the Company has
significantly reduced costs and is
undertaking a staged ramp-up that
will increase production by a third and
maximise returns from this long-life asset.
We have also stepped up exploration both
on the island, and the mainland nearby.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
5
cHiEf EXEcutivE officEr’s rEPort
The iron ore price volatility that continued
through the latter part of 2012 and
into 2013 underlines the importance
of our focus on business optimisation,
operational agility and cost reduction in
order that our business can remain robust
even during times of high volatility.
This approach required some extremely
difficult decisions, in particular a significant
reduction of our workforce in October
2012. However, our actions were
necessary to reposition the business to
meet the challenges of the market.
As planned, the Company’s approach
reduced total cash expenditure by
$140 million compared with our original
internal budget for the year, and captured
at least $50 million in permanent ongoing
annual savings. Our focus on costs
remains unrelenting and we are confident
of identifying additional permanent savings
in the year ahead.
This commitment, combined with the
continued strength of our balance sheet,
also will allow us to better capture the
benefits of stronger iron ore prices in
periods of improved market performance.
I am pleased to provide my report for
Mount Gibson Iron Limited for the 2012/13
financial year.
As always, the safety and wellbeing of our
employees is at the forefront of conducting
our business. Our performance on this
front was mixed during the year and we
are committed to achieving continuous
improvement across our entire business.
Both our Mid West mines delivered excellent
results. In January, Extension Hill passed
12 months without a Lost Time Injury (LTI)
and remained LTI-free at the end of the
financial year. Tallering Peak also achieved
significant improvement, and subsequent
to the end of the year, passed 12 months
LTI-free in early September 2013.
Unfortunately Koolan Island’s performance
declined, however we have implemented
a range of actions that have contributed
to an encouraging level of improvement
since the end of the financial year.
On the production front, the year was
characterised by strong performance,
delivering record full year sales of
8.8 million tonnes and providing a
substantial buffer against the prevailing
volatile market conditions.
Particularly pleasing was the record
performance of our Mid West operations,
which offset the planned short-term
slow-down in ore production at Koolan
Island in the first half of the financial year
after which we commenced our ramp-up
to 4 million tonnes that is forecast to be
achieved by the end of 2014.
These achievements demonstrate the merits
of our portfolio management approach to
operating our business, giving us confidence
of further increased sales to more than
9 million tonnes in the current year.
6
8
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Our strong performance in the year was
built on significant improvement across all
our operations.
In March 2013, the Company announced the
completion of the Koolan Island optimisation
study, which confirmed a staged production
ramp-up as the most value accretive
development strategy. This will enable us to
maximise returns from Koolan Island for the
minimum risk in a volatile iron ore market.
This will also better balance the overall
performance of Mount Gibson’s existing
asset portfolio. Our Mid West business
Tallering Peak Crusher Manager Carlos Munoz
is now in its peak production and cash
generation phase, which will be followed
by Koolan Island’s peak cash generating
phase later in the decade.
At Tallering Peak, we addressed significant
operational problems which affected
the mine’s performance in early 2012,
and further extended the mine life by 12
months to mid 2014, delivering significant
additional value to Mount Gibson.
Similarly at Extension Hill, we successfully
debottlenecked and ramped-up port and
rail throughput, enabling us to maximise
sales from this high-margin operation.
Our efforts at Tallering Peak and Extension
Hill demonstrate our ongoing commitment
to the Mid West region, where we have
invested heavily in strategic export capacity
and are targeting opportunities that will
complement our existing operations.
Mount Gibson intends to remain a
substantial producer in this region.
In April 2013, Mount Gibson completed
the purchase of a substantial exploration
landholding that covers exploration
tenements at Field’s Find, north of the
Extension Hill mine. This acquisition is a
result of carefully focusing our resources
on growth opportunities where we have
existing infrastructure and proven expertise.
The Company is also looking to the area
immediately south of Extension Hill,
which – based on detailed reviews of past
exploration data – we believe has the most
exciting near-mine exploration potential for
iron ore in the Mid West.
We are excited about the potential of both
areas and look forward to commencing
work at the earliest opportunity.
programs delivering significant improvement,
we are increasingly turning our attention to
broader long-term opportunities to expand
our business. In this, our primary focus
remains on iron ore opportunities that
complement our existing operations.
Rest assured that we will apply the same
strict discipline and diligence that we
have demonstrated in our operational
performance during the last year to
any opportunities we may consider.
The primary consideration is to create
superior value for shareholders.
Mount Gibson remains committed to
operating in a sustainable manner with
regards to the environment and the local
communities in our areas of operation.
We have improved our environmental
reporting and introduced a new Corporate
Risk Policy. Our community affairs activities
included implementing a new community
consultation program for our Mid West
sites, and a review of our Traditional
Owner agreements.
I would like to take this opportunity to
thank all of our employees, contractors
and suppliers for their efforts, as well as the
support of our diverse stakeholder
groups including our valued shareholders.
I would also like to thank the Board for its
contribution and continued strong support.
Our strong financial position, expanding
sales outlook, capable team and our
demonstrated ability to deliver business
enhancement position Mount Gibson well
for further operating improvement and
business growth for the near future.
With our new executive team being well
established and our site optimisation
Jim Beyer
Chief Executive Officer
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
7
9
oPErAtionAL rEviEW
During 2012/13, Mount Gibson achieved record total ore sales of 8.8 million
tonnes, a 69% increase over the previous year. This comprised a record
8.1 million tonnes of direct shipping ore (DSO) hematite, and 709,000 tonnes of
Rizhao Special Product (RSP).
Higher sales were achieved in line with the Company’s strategy of temporarily
moderating mining activity whilst maximising sales from ore stockpiles.
This both helped minimise cash expenditure during a period of extreme price
volatility, but also enabled considered business optimisation plans to be
implemented across all sites without curtailing sales.
KOOLAN isLANd
The 2012/13 financial year was one of
transition at Koolan Island as management
focused on optimising the mining schedule
for Main Pit.
Total ore sales increased 22% to 3.5 million
tonnes, as conventional ore sales were
supplemented by the first sales of Rizhao
Special Product (RSP).
Although a low-grade product, the low
cost of RSP to Mount Gibson makes it a
high-margin product, and the Company
looks forward to achieving similar RSP
sales in the 2014 financial year.
These sales were particularly important
in 2012/13 in supplementing a planned
reduction of ore production from Main Pit
to allow the mine plan to be optimised.
This planned reduction was implemented
in October 2012 as part of a business-wide
initiative to reduce costs and prepare a
base to establish improved productivity.
This initiative included a reduction of
approximately 240 positions at Koolan
Island.
In March 2013, Mount Gibson announced
the optimisation work had confirmed a
staged ramp-up to 4 million tonnes per
annum (Mtpa) as the most value accretive
development strategy for Koolan Island.
The ramp-up commenced in April 2013,
with the final target expected to be achieved
by the end of calendar 2014. The staged
ramp-up will reduce financial and technical
risks of Main Pit development.
Though June quarter production was
adversely affected by heavy unseasonal
rain, the optimisation work progressed
well and significant cost and productivity
improvements were achieved as mining
activity increased.
A major maintenance shutdown of the
crushing circuit was also undertaken during
the June quarter to coincide with the
planned period of reduced ore production.
Construction of a new maintenance
workshop also continued, with final fit-out
nearing completion. These initiatives will
assist in achieving targeted production
and productivity levels.
Koolan Island Port Control Officer Rebecca Keys
8
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
KOOLAN isLANd
HigHLigHTs
22% increase in total ore
sales to 3.5 million tonnes
Rizhao Special Product
sales commenced
Ramp-up to 4 million tonnes
per annum underway
Improving productivity and
cost profile as ramp-up
progresses
uP22%
KOOLAn ISLAnD TOTAL ORE SALES
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
9
Mid WEsT
HigHLigHTs
Record sales of 5.3 million
tonnes, more than double
the previous year
Strong rail availability
delivering 5.1 million tonnes
to Geraldton Port
Record ore shipments
from Geraldton of 1.6 million
tonnes in the June quarter,
equivalent to an annualised
export rate of more than
6 Mtpa
Delineation of T1 deposit
extends Tallering Peak mine
life by one year
uP124%
MID WEST ORE SALES
10
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Mid WEsT
Extension Hill
The year commenced with a contraction
in mining rates, reflecting a planned
reduction in activity to reduce costs and
maximise sales from the substantial ore
stockpiles built up at both the mine site
and Perenjori rail siding as a result of port
and rail constraints experienced in the
previous year.
This approach delivered record ore sales
of 2.8 million tonnes on mine production
of only 1.8 million tonnes. At year end,
stockpiles of crushed finished product
at the Perenjori rail siding had more than
halved to 295,000 tonnes, while mine-site
stockpiles of uncrushed standard product
had also been reduced to approximately
446,000 tonnes.
Rail availability reached contracted capacity
before the end of the 2012 calendar year,
following the completion of works on the
regional rail network and Mount Gibson’s
upgraded facilities at Geraldton Port.
This resulted in record June quarter sales
from Extension Hill of 968,000 tonnes,
including opportunistic mine gate
sales totalling 176,000 tonnes from the
Perenjori siding to a third party with
available rail capacity.
Extension Hill Excavator Operator Rebecca Reid
Tallering Peak
The Tallering Peak mine performed strongly
throughout the year. A total of 2.1 million
tonnes were mined, representing a 10%
increase over the previous year. More than
half of this ore was mined in the first half of
the year, with activity slowing as the mine
approached the end of the reserve life.
However, ore sales increased 60% to
2.6 million tonnes, reflecting increased
sales from stockpiles and improved rail
availability following the completion of
regional rail upgrades.
Most importantly, a maiden resource for
the T1 satellite deposit was reported in the
March quarter, followed by the declaration
of ore reserves in July 2013.
Development commenced following the
receipt of mining approval in July 2013.
Critically, mine design optimisation of
the existing T6 pit and the development
of T1 has extended the expected life of
Tallering Peak by approximately 12 months
to mid 2014.
Tallering Peak is now expected to
generate total ore sales of 2.5 million
tonnes in the 2014 financial year, including
700,000 tonnes of lower grade ore
already in stockpiles. This extra year of
sales represents the creation of significant
additional value for Mount Gibson.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
11
EXPLORATiON
Mid West
Mount Gibson’s long-term growth strategy
is to seek and evaluate opportunities to
complement its existing businesses, with
a near-term focus on identifying suitable
opportunities in the Mid West region where
the Company’s existing processing and
infrastructure footprint gives Mount Gibson
a strategic competitive advantage.
EXTENSION HILL
Extension Hill South
Early in 2013, Mount Gibson completed
a detailed review of past exploration data
from the area immediately south of the
Extension Hill open pit, with the result that
the Company considers the area to have
the most exciting near mine exploration
potential for iron ore in the Mid West.
A Program of Work for a drilling program
at Extension Hill South is currently being
assessed by the Department of Mines
and Petroleum (DMP). An environmental
survey was conducted in April across the
exploration area yielding encouraging data
to assist access. Heritage approvals have
been granted for the planned exploration.
In June, Mount Gibson applied for an
additional exploration licence over ground
adjacent to the Field’s Find project
tenements. The application is on the
strike extension of Baron Rothschild and
Stone Hut prospects and covers a portion
of the Pinyalling Hills that is considered
prospective for iron ore.
TALLERING PEAK
Exploration activity at the T1 prospect at
Tallering Peak – comprising two phases of
RC drilling – commenced towards the end
of the 2012 financial year and continued
through to December.
Evaluation of the technical data from this
drilling combined with historical data led
to the reporting of a maiden Indicated
and Inferred Mineral Resource for T1 in
March 2013.
The T1 deposit Mineral Resource stands at
1.4 million tonnes at a grade of 60.4% Fe,
and shortly after year end, Mount Gibson
announced Probable Ore Reserves of
801,000 tonnes grading 61.0% Fe.
With key State Government approvals
received, Mount Gibson commenced
development of T1 in July 2013. Production
is expected to conclude in mid 2014.
Field’s Find
Koolan Island
In December 2012, Mount Gibson
announced it had reached agreement
with Royal Resources Ltd to acquire a
substantial landholding at Field’s Find,
approximately 60 kilometres north of the
Extension Hill mine.
The land package covers approximately
250 square kilometres and includes a
number of iron ore targets, including the
Plateau prospect. It also covers the historic
Baron Rothschild and Field’s Find gold
camps and the abandoned Warriedar
copper mine.
Technical due diligence for the acquisition
was completed in the early part of 2013,
with the acquisition finalised in April.
Several field visits were conducted before
year end, including surface mapping
and review of workings. Permitting is
well advanced and drilling is expected to
commence later in 2013.
Mount Gibson’s Koolan South exploration
licence is located on the mainland directly
south of Koolan Island, covering an under-
explored area of 230 square kilometres
considered prospective for iron ore and
base metals.
A helicopter-supported exploration and
reconnaissance program commenced
during the last week of the year – the
first time Mount Gibson geologists have
had access to the area since grant of the
tenement in October 2012 – and a second
program was conducted early in the new
financial year.
While exploration on this project area is
at a very early stage, the geology is now
better understood, with data from the initial
phase proving to be of significant value for
future exploration activity.
The Company is also revisiting the
exploration potential of the western end
of the island following a review of prior
exploration results.
12
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
EXPLORATiON
HigHLigHTs
Exploration activity at
T1 deposit at Tallering
Peak leads to resource
declaration and approval
of mining proposal
Advancement of exploration
permitting at Extension
Hill South
Acquisition of exploration
landholding at Field’s Find,
north of Extension Hill
Commencement of Koolan
South exploration program
Tallering Peak Mining Manager Folker Schilling
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
13
HEALtH AnD sAfEtY
EnvironMEnt
coMMunitY AffAirs
14
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Koolan Island Maintenance Superintendent Scott Quintrell
Koolan Island Occupational Health Nurse Sandy Daniels
HEALTH ANd sAFETy
• a study to address musculoskeletal as
well as other injuries across all sites, and
Corporate
Mount Gibson made significant progress
during 2012/13 in raising a higher level
of safety awareness across all of its
operations. This included implementation
of a new web-based system to record
and report health and safety statistics,
enabling more effective document control,
consistency between sites, accountability
and transparency.
Following an external risk review of all
operations, risk registers have been
developed for all operations. The risk
registers are monitored and documented
through status reports/presentations to
executive management and the Operational
Risk and Sustainability Committee (ORSC).
The ORSC is a sub-committee of the Board
of Directors and is responsible for formally
reporting the operational risk status to the
Board on an annual basis.
External health and safety management
systems audits were conducted across all
operations.
Further corporate achievements for the
year included:
• Crisis Management Standard developed
and mock scenarios conducted,
•
“Good to Go” OH&S contractor
management process developed and
implemented,
• developed and implemented a
consistent CONTAM (air quality
monitoring program) process and
subsequent risk assessments to satisfy
the requirements of the Department
of Mines and Petroleum (DMP),
• conducted Section 44 training for
line managers,
•
line management leadership
training at Koolan Island as part of
the “Journey” Program,
•
implementation of business systems
for training competence and flight and
roster coordination across all operations.
Mid West
EXTENSION HILL
The implementation of new safety
management systems allowed a more
focused approach to addressing safety
issues and solutions, resulting in a strong
safety performance by Extension Hill during
the year and an outstanding average
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)
at 30 June of 0.0.
The site recorded a 73% reduction in all
recordable injury rates, and remained Lost
Time Injury (LTI) and Medical Treatment
Injury (MTI) free over this period, after
achieving 12 months LTI-free in January
2013. This was aided by audits of all facets
of the operation, including contractors,
together with broad training programs to
provide employees with the required skills
and knowledge necessary to safely and
competently complete their duties
A key result of this training has been the
site’s Emergency Response Team’s ability
to positively respond to motor traffic
incidents on the Great Northern Highway,
with positive feedback from emergency
services in attendance.
The Extension Hill Fatigue Management
Program was a runner-up finalist in the
Chambers of Minerals and Energy Safety
Awards for 2013.
TALLERING PEAK
Tallering Peak achieved a 32% reduction in
the site Total Recordable Injury Frequency
Rate during the 2012/13 year, while the
12 month average LTIFR at 30 June had
halved to 2.0. This reflected a range
of initiatives aimed at injury prevention
and promoting a positive safety culture.
Subsequent to the end of the period, in
early September 2013, Tallering Peak
passed the milestone of 12 months LTI-free.
A strong focus on increasing the participation
of crew-based toolbox meetings also
led to increased employee buy-in and
consultation on all safety matters.
Injury prevention and injury management
was a strong focus throughout the year,
with assistance from an external injury
management provider to expedite the
return to work of injured workers.
Scenario-based training and the
procurement of additional rescue and
medical equipment have strengthened
the site’s emergency response and first
aid capabilities.
Koolan Island
Koolan Island’s safety performance was
disappointing in the year, with an average
LTIFR at 30 June of 10.0, compared with
5.0 at the end of the previous year.
A number of initiatives have been
implemented to improve performance
focused on the strengthening of policies,
procedures and work instructions, coupled
with an emphasis on safety behaviour
as part of the drive to achieve and
ensure a safe place of work. Importantly,
performance has improved significantly
since the end of the financial year.
Site leaders were supported with
the introduction of a safety-oriented
leadership training package for managers,
superintendents and supervisors. The
site-based training team was strengthened
in preparation for the ramp-up in employee
numbers, and the induction process was
enhanced to capture the changes to safety
procedures and expected behaviours.
The year also saw the development of a
single integrated Health, Safety, Environment
and Training (HSET) department. This has
ensured the consistent development of
documentation and training packages and
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
15
creates the opportunity to align processes
whenever possible.
To ensure the capability of the Emergency
Response Team (ERT) was maintained,
two block training sessions were
conducted such that the experienced
ERT members continued to improve their
skillset and the new members learnt new
skills. The ERT is a critical aspect of the
island operation given its remote location.
ENviRONMENT
Corporate
The 2012/13 financial year was one of
significant achievements in the area of
environmental protection and preservation.
Mount Gibson formed a dedicated
internal Environmental Reporting Team
to streamline and standardise the
processes for tracking and reporting fuel
consumption and energy production, data
collection and verification. The group’s
report and recommendations will improve
the accuracy and efficiency of future
Greenhouse reporting to government.
A Safety and Environment Team conducted
risk workshops across all sites, introduced
a new Corporate Risk Policy and risk
likelihood/consequence matrix, and ran
an assessment of progress against Risk
Action Plans. In addition, a review of safety
risks specific to site-based environmental
personnel was conducted, resulting in the
development of a range of management
strategies to mitigate those risks.
Environment and heritage field surveys were
conducted for the proposed exploration
areas of Field’s Find in the Mid West, and
the mainland south of Koolan Island.
Various requests for approvals or
amendments were submitted to
government departments, including the
Department of Mines and Petroleum
(DMP), the Department of Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Populations and
Community (DSEWPaC), the Department
of Environment and Conservation (DEC)
and the Office of the Environmental
Protection Authority (OEPA).
Detailed third party mine closure cost
estimates and decommissioning plans
were delivered for each of the sites.
These cost estimates build on previous,
desk top and high level cost estimates
and will enable Mount Gibson to better
plan the rehabilitation of its sites at the
end of mine life.
Environmental audits were conducted
during the year at all Mount Gibson
operations, focusing on identifying
potential gaps in the sites’ environmental
systems to ensure regulatory compliance,
and enable the implementation of
appropriate action plans.
A legal reference system for inclusion on all
Mount Gibson intranet sites was created,
providing site-wide intranet access to all
current legislation and Australian Standards
relating to environment and safety.
The first two biodiversity offset payments
associated with DSEWPaC approvals
were made to the DEC to fund the
implementation of recovery actions
related to the Kimberley region and island
populations of the Northern Quoll.
Koolan Island
Regulatory approvals
A series of regulatory approvals were
gained for Koolan Island during the past
12 months:
• approval from DSEWPaC to develop
Acacia East under the Environmental
Protection and Biodiversity
Conservation Act 1999, and
•
revision and approval of the Significant
Species Management Plans from the
OEPA.
Rehabilitation and mine closure
During the period Koolan Island developed
and submitted a Mine Closure Plan to
the DMP with the assistance of relevant
expertise in accordance with the DMP mine
closure guidelines. The plan will be utilised
to manage the environmental impacts of the
mine during its operation and after it closes.
It will assist in minimising the environmental
and financial liability of the operation.
Koolan Island engaged a consultant
to assist with the development of a
rehabilitation plan and guidelines. To date
the focus has been on determining the
appropriate soil and vegetation associations
with native species to determine those
species most appropriate for use.
A specialised seed storage facility was
constructed and will be used for the
storage of native seed species collected
for later use in rehabilitation programs.
Contaminated sites
With the assistance of specialised
expertise, Koolan Island undertook
investigations into legacy and current
contaminated sites across the island in
order to identify and determine the level
and extent of contamination. It is intended
that areas will be remediated to prevent
both current and future potential impacts
to the environment. These efforts have
been made in consultation with the DEC.
Reporting
Koolan Island submitted a range of
regulatory reports during the year, including:
• Annual Compliance Certificate
– DSEWPaC
• Annual Audit Compliance Report
and Annual Environmental Report
– DEC and DMP
• Annual groundwater and aquifer review
– DEC and OEPA
• National Pollutant Inventory and
National Greenhouse Energy Report
– DSEWPaC
16
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Koolan Island Training Supervisor Chris Thompson and Manager External Relations John Phaceas
formed part of Koolan Island’s approach to
conducting further research on the species
and sharing this information with the
scientific community.
An island-wide survey was also conducted
on the Northern Quoll due to requirements
of approvals granted by DSEWPaC. The
initial report indicates a 9% increase in
individual captures, which demonstrates
the population’s health and abundance
continues to be maintained. The 2012/13
Annual Northern Quoll Populations Survey
showed an increase in population to
numbers above the 2006 baseline survey.
The four marine monitoring surveys
conducted during the reporting year
indicated that the marine environment
surrounding Koolan Island was not being
impacted by mining activity. In addition,
the exotic marine pest survey found no
exotic pests in the marine environment
surrounding Koolan Island.
Weather monitoring
The Koolan Island weather station was
commissioned during the year, providing
real-time weather information to the site and
to Mount Gibson’s intra and internet. It is
also designed to provide a constant stream
of weather information to personnel in the
cyclone shelter in the event of a cyclone.
During the period Koolan Island was
also subject to an audit by the OEPA
for compliance under Part IV of the
Environmental Protection Act 1986.
The audit concluded that Koolan Island
was in substantial compliance with the
relevant obligations under this act.
Approvals were also sought for an
extension to the capacity of areas
designated for the disposal of general
waste. Once approved, this extension
will allow for the responsible disposal of
waste generated for the life of mine.
Flora and fauna
Wild passionfruit (Passiflora foetida)
is a weed species that is widespread
throughout the Kimberley region of Western
Australia. Koolan Island recently contributed
to an offset program with the DEC and
CSIRO to determine an appropriate control
that would reduce the extent of the weed.
Koolan Island is working in collaboration
with CSIRO scientists to undertake the
research. The project is planned to continue
during the next reporting period.
Koolan Island is home to the Northern
Quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), which is listed
as an endangered species under the
Environmental Protection and Biodiversity
Conservation Act 1999. The frequency of
the monitoring regime was increased in
an effort to better understand seasonal
variations such as changes in health and
mass, life span, offspring gender and
survival, and population structure. This
Mid West
EXTENSION HILL
Regulatory approvals
During the year, the following approvals
were received:
• a revised Mining Proposal Addendum,
which included changes to the waste
dump design to incorporate the
results of the erosion modelling study
completed in the previous period,
• an exemption from Total Fire Ban,
granted under s22c of the Bush Fires
Act 1954,
• changes to the mining rate,
vegetation clearing area and power
supply, granted under s45c of the
Environmental Protection Act 1986,
• amendments to the DEC Prescribed
Premises Licence, allowing for
additional waste types to be disposed
of on site, a relocation of the landfill
and permitting the burning of some
waste materials for Emergency
Response training,
• amendments to the groundwater
licence and operating strategy, such
as burying the water pipelines for fire
protection and reducing the monitoring
obligation, and
• amendment to the Dangerous Goods
Licence to include the ability to store
LPG at the camp.
A Program of Works application has been
submitted to the DMP for an exploration
drilling program on Iron Hill and Gibson Hill.
Malleefowl
A Malleefowl Mound Monitoring Survey is
conducted once every breeding season,
and this was undertaken during November
and December 2012. A total of 10 mounds
were recorded as being active.
Mount Gibson communicates regularly
with the North Central Malleefowl
Conservation Group to remain abreast
of any new developments or improvements
in Malleefowl conservation practices,
and regularly promotes awareness on site
of the plight of the bird through various
media including inductions, photographs,
signs and site notices.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
17
cOMMUNiTy AFFAiRs
Corporate
A formal tripartite (government, community
and Mount Gibson) Community
Consultation program has been
implemented for the Mid West mine sites,
with two meetings held during November
2012, including a bus tour of the mine site
by community stakeholders. The Extension
Hill Community Consultation process
was updated to the new standard with a
meeting held in May 2013, and this process
will flow on to Koolan Island later in 2013.
Environment and community affairs
personnel, together with Koolan Island
site personnel, represented the
organisation again at the annual Norwest
Expo held in Broome.
A Donations Team has been implemented
for the assessment of applications for
sponsorship from various community
groups. Sponsorship is focused on
education, health and community events,
and over $100,000 was provided in
2012/13 to a wide range of community
programs, with particular emphasis on
initiatives in the Mid West and Kimberley,
including an Arts and Writers Award for
children in the Mid West.
Declared Rare Flora
Annual monitoring of the health status of
two Declared Rare Flora (DRF) species
– Darwinia masonii and Lepidosperma
gibsonii – was conducted during the year
by external consultants.
To support this activity, additional
environmental factors such as dust, wind,
rainfall and groundwater are also regularly
monitored. There have been no recorded
detrimental impacts due to mining
activities detected to date in the regular
weekly and monthly visual assessments
of these species.
TALLERING PEAK
Regulatory approvals
During the year, the following approvals
were received from the DMP:
• a second Program of Works for the
T1 exploration area (new areas of
clearing required)
• a Mining Proposal to expand the truck
turnaround bay at the entrance to the
operations
• a Mining Proposal to establish in-pit
dumping areas on the eastern and
western ends of the T6 pit
A targeted DRF flora survey was
conducted along the proposed exploration
drilling lines on Iron Hill and Gibson Hill.
• a Mining Proposal for the T1 Pit,
Haul Road and Waste Rock
Management Project
Audits/inspections
The following audits/inspections were
conducted by regulatory authorities during
the year:
•
•
the OEPA conducted a desktop audit
in November 2012 and found the
site to be compliant with Ministerial
Statement 786, and
the DEC conducted a compliance
inspection of the site in August 2012
and found no compliance issues.
Reporting
Regulatory reports submitted during the
year included:
• Annual and Quarterly Potable Water
Reports – Department of Health
Key State mining approval was received
for the T1 deposit in July, with first ore
anticipated in September 2013.
Audits/inspections
The following audits/inspections were
conducted during the year:
• an internal audit of the site in May 2013,
• a compliance inspection of the site
by the DMP in May 2013, resulting in
receipt of a letter requesting further
information for several items related to
closure, and
• a compliance inspection of the site
by the DEC in June 2013, resulting in
receipt of a letter requesting some minor
improvements to the management of
hydrocarbons and dust suppression.
• Annual Groundwater Report –
Department of Water
Reporting
• Consolidated Annual Environmental
Report – DSEWPaC, DEC (Geraldton),
OEPA and DMP
• Annual Environmental Report for the
Road and Rail – OEPA
• Annual Compliance Certificate –
DSEWPaC
Regulatory reports submitted during the
year included:
• Annual Groundwater Report
– Department of Water
• Annual Environmental Report
– DEC (Geraldton)
• Annual Audit Compliance Report
• Annual Audit Compliance Report –
– DEC (Geraldton)
DEC (Geraldton)
Other
An external consultant was commissioned
to conduct a closure costing assessment
of the mine site.
The bio-remediation pad and the landfill were
both relocated to the waste dump footprint
to improve accessibility by machinery and
improve the management regime.
Negotiations with the DEC were completed
regarding the employment of a part-time
DEC officer, to be advertised by the DEC.
• Annual Environmental Report
– DMP (Perth)
• Annual Clearing Reports for all approved
clearing permits – DMP (Perth)
Mine closure
An external consultant was commissioned
to produce a decommissioning plan and
conduct a closure costing assessment
of the site, while the Mine Closure Plan
Version 7 was submitted to the DMP
for approval in October 2012. This plan
was reviewed – and was provisionally
accepted – by the DMP, and Version 8 was
submitted in August 2013.
18
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Traditional Dambimangari dancers celebrating the opening of the Centre
Koolan Island
A visit by Dambimangari Elders to
Koolan Island resulted in the granting of
permission, by the Koolan Island Traditional
Owners, to conduct a preliminary non-
ground disturbing exploration of the
mainland south of Koolan Island.
Ongoing consultation with the Dambimangari
people included discussions on how the
new Dambimangari rangers could be used
on Koolan Island for work such as seed
collecting for mine site rehabilitation, weed
control, preparation for the Indigenous
Protected Area (IPA) and the official
opening of the Cultural Heritage Centre.
The Cultural Heritage Centre on Koolan
Island is a requirement of the Coexistence
Deed between Mount Gibson and
the Dambimangari People. Since its
construction by Mount Gibson in 2010,
the Centre has been used for a range
of training and development programs
including development of a Cultural
Awareness Program.
Koolan Island has supported a range of
community activities including sponsorship
for the local Boab Festival, school camps, art
and local sport awards. In addition Koolan
Island continues to support local business
through the purchase of goods locally and
use of local contractors where possible.
Mid West
EXTENSION HILL
To encourage communication with key
stakeholders, Mount Gibson hosted
a Project Update and Environmental
Discussion Meeting on site in June 2013,
involving representatives from the local
Shires, the North Central Malleefowl
Preservation Group, neighbours and
the DEC.
Mount Gibson continued to host and
participate in biannual meetings of the
Badimia Monitoring and Liaison Committee
on site throughout the period, and regularly
participated in the Gunduwa Regional
Conservation Association, which will be
hosting an “Understanding Our Region”
workshop in October 2013.
The Perenjori Public Benefit Committee
met twice during the year to assess
applications from the community for the
Public Benefit Funds provided by Mount
Gibson. Recipients of funding include
the Perenjori Cricket Club, St John
Ambulance, the Perenjori Tourist Bureau
and the Latham Golf and Bowls Club.
The Yalgoo Public Benefit Agreement
was amended slightly to improve the
administration of the funding, and Mount
Gibson contributed to the Perenjori
Early Childhood Centre through a Public
Infrastructure Fund payment.
Biodiversity offsets payments were made
to Bush Heritage Australia, the Australian
Wildlife Conservancy and the Pindiddy
Aboriginal Corporation to assist in the
biodiversity and conservation projects in
the immediate vicinity of the mine site.
Funding was provided to the Badimia
Native Title Party, including a payment
specifically to promote the Law and
Culture of Indigenous Australians and
the Badimia people in particular.
TALLERING PEAK
A formal stakeholder consultation
program, outlining key mine closure
issues, was initiated in November 2012.
A public meeting was held in Mullewa at
that time and a public tour of the mine
was conducted in April 2013. Further
stakeholder consultation will occur as
the mine progresses towards closure
in mid-2014.
Regular meetings with the Pastoral Lease
Holder and the Traditional Owner Group
were held during the year. Traditional
Owners on site at Tallering Peak were
involved in a detailed heritage assessment
and subsequently provided participants to
observe exploration drilling at T1.
CEO Jim Beyer and Dambimangari Aboriginal Corporation
Chairman Warren Barunga officially opening the Koolan
Island Cultural Heritage and Training Centre, with traditional
dancers and members of the Dambimangari Rangers.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
19
rEsourcEs AnD rEsErvEs
as at 30 June 2013
Tonnes
millions
Fe
%
SiO2
%
Al2O3
%
Koolan Island
Mineral Resources, above 50% Fe
Measured
Indicated
Inferred
Total
Ore Reserves, above 50% Fe
Proved
Probable
Total
Extension Hill
Mineral Resources, above 50% Fe
Measured
Indicated
Inferred
Total
Ore Reserves, above 50% Fe
Proved
Probable
Total
Tallering Peak
Mineral Resources, above 50% Fe
Measured
Indicated
Inferred
Total
Ore Reserves, above 50% Fe
Proved
Probable
Total
8.4
44.6
15.4
68.5
4.2
26.0
30.2
10.5
4.1
0.3
14.8
9.7
3.1
12.8
2.0
3.1
0.3
5.4
0.5
1.6
2.1
59.7
64.5
60.7
63.0
59.5
64.8
64.0
58.0
58.1
52.9
57.9
58.1
58.9
58.3
60.0
57.9
54.7
58.5
59.8
58.1
58.5
TOTAL GROUP MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES AT 30 JUNE 2013
Total Mineral Resources
Total Ore Reserves
NOTE: Errors may occur due to rounding.
88.6
45.2
61.9
62.1
12.72
6.21
12.15
8.35
14.18
5.70
6.89
6.50
9.06
10.71
7.28
6.54
8.92
7.12
5.53
10.12
15.56
8.72
6.39
10.93
9.81
8.19
7.09
1.14
0.77
0.60
0.78
0.37
0.82
0.76
2.24
1.61
5.46
2.12
2.18
1.23
1.96
3.27
2.40
2.99
2.76
2.91
1.88
2.14
1.12
1.16
P
%
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.03
Attributions: The information in this report relating to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Elizabeth Haren, who is a member and Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute
of Mining and Metallurgy. Elizabeth Haren has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a
Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Elizabeth Haren consents to the inclusion in the report
of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears. Elizabeth Haren was a full-time employee of, and is a consultant to Mount Gibson Mining Limited. The information in this
report relating to Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Weifeng Li, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Weifeng Li has sufficient experience that is relevant to
the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Weifeng Li consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears. Weifeng
Li is a consultant to Mount Gibson Mining Limited.
20
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Directors’ Report
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Consolidated Income Statement
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Report
Directors’ Declaration
Independent Auditor’s Report
Corporate Governance Statement
ASX Additional Information
22
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
92
93
95
101
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
21
Directors’ report
Your Directors submit their report for the year ended 30 June 2013 for Mount Gibson Iron Limited (“Company” or “Mount Gibson”) and
the consolidated entity incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year (“Group”).
Directors
The names and details of the Company’s Directors in office during the financial period and until the date of this report are set out below.
Directors were in office for the entire period unless otherwise stated.
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities
Geoffrey Hill B.Econ, MBA, FCPA, FCDA, FSIA
Chairman, Independent Non-Executive Director
Mr Hill was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 20 May 2011 and Chairman on 24 August 2011. He is a company
director and merchant banker. He served as Managing Director and Chief Executive Australia of the Morgan Grenfell group in the mid-
1980s, before forming his own investment advisory business, International Pacific Securities. He is currently the Chairman of Texas and
Oklahoma Coal Company Limited and Metals Finance Limited, and a director of Broken Hill Prospecting Limited and Asian Property
Investments Limited and is the Executive Chairman of International Pacific Securities Inc. During the past three years Mr Hill has also
served as a director of Centrex Metals Limited, Hills Holdings Limited, Outback Metals Limited and Heritage Gold Limited.
Lee Seng Hui LLB (Hons)
Non-Executive Deputy Chairman
Mr Lee was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 29 January 2010 and was appointed as Non-Executive Deputy Chairman on
14 December 2012. Mr Lee graduated with Honours from the University of Sydney Law School. Mr Lee is the Chief Executive and an
Executive Director of Allied Group Limited which is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. He is also the Chairman and a Non-
Executive Director of Tian An China Investments Company Limited and a Non-Executive Director of both Tanami Gold NL and APAC
Resources Limited, the latter being one of Mount Gibson’s substantial shareholders. Mr Lee was previously the Chairman and an
Executive Director of Yu Ming Investments Limited (now known as SHK Hong Kong Industries Limited). During the past 3 years Mr Lee
has not served as a director of any other listed companies.
Alan Jones CA
Independent Non-Executive Director
Mr Jones was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 28 July 2006. Mr Jones is a Chartered Accountant with
extensive senior management and board experience in listed and unlisted Australian public companies, particularly in the construction,
engineering, finance and investment industries. Mr Jones has been involved in the successful merger and acquisition of a number of
public companies in Australia and internationally. He is a Non-Executive Director of Mulpha Australia Ltd, Sun Hung Kai & Co Ltd (Hong
Kong), Allied Group Ltd (Hong Kong), Allied Properties Ltd (Hong Kong) and Air Change International Limited.
Chen Zhouping CPA
Non-Executive Director
Mr Chen was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 19 January 2009. Mr Chen is a graduate from the School of Economics and
Management, Beijing Tsinghua University, and is a member of the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He has extensive
experience in the steel industry, engineering design, human resources and management. Mr Chen was appointed as Deputy Managing
Director of Shougang Concord International Enterprises Company Limited (“Shougang International”) in November 2002. He is also
the Deputy Managing Director of Shougang Holding (Hong Kong) Limited (“Shougang Holding”) and the Vice Chairman and Managing
Director of Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited formerly known as Fushan International Energy Group Limited (a Hong Kong
listed company), a substantial shareholder of Mount Gibson. He is a director of a number of other companies of which Shougang
Holding or Shougang International is the holding company. During the past three years Mr Chen has not served as a director of any
other listed companies.
Li Shaofeng B.Automation
Non-Executive Director
Mr Li was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 23 February 2012. Mr Li has extensive experience in the management of and
investments in various listed companies, Sino-foreign joint ventures and steel industry entities. He holds a bachelor degree in Automation
from University of Science and Technology Beijing. He is the Vice Chairman and Managing Director of Shougang Holding (Hong Kong)
Limited. Mr Li is the Managing Director of Shougang Concord International Enterprises Company Limited and the Chairman of each
of Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited, a substantial shareholder of Mount Gibson, Shougang Concord Century Holdings
Limited, Shougang Concord Technology Holdings Limited, Shougang Concord Grand (Group) Limited and Global Digital Creations
Holdings Limited, all of which are companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. He is also a director of Sinocop Resources
(Holdings) Limited, a Hong Kong listed company.
Russell Barwick Dip.Mining Engineering, FAICD, FAusIMM
Independent Non-Executive Director
Mr Barwick was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 16 November 2011. Mr Barwick is a mining engineer with 40
years of technical, operational, managerial and corporate experience in international mining companies covering various commodities.
He has worked for Bougainville Copper Limited (CRA), Pancontinental Mining Ltd (Jabiluka Uranium) and CSR Limited (coal). He has
spent 17 years with Placer Dome Asia Pacific in key development, operational and corporate roles in numerous countries culminating in
his appointment as Managing Director of Placer Niugini Ltd. He then served as Managing Director of Newcrest Mining Limited (2000 to
2001). For the four years to the end of 2006, Mr Barwick was the Chief Operating Officer of Wheaton River Minerals Ltd and Goldcorp
Inc., based in Vancouver, Canada. He was subsequently the Chief Executive Officer of Canada-based Gammon Gold Inc. before
returning to Australia in 2008. He is currently the Chairman of Red Metal Ltd.
22
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
Simon Bird B.Acc.Science (Hons) FCPA, FAICD
Independent Non-Executive Director
Mr Bird was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 23 February 2012 and is Chairman of the Audit and Financial Risk
Management Committee. Mr Bird has 27 years of international finance experience, including holding the positions of General Manager
Finance for Stockland Ltd, Chief Financial Officer of GrainCorp Ltd for six years, and Chief Financial Officer of Wizard Mortgage Corp
for two years. He was also until recently the CEO of ASX-listed King Island Scheelite Ltd which is developing the tungsten mines on King
Island in Tasmania. Mr Bird is a Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Metals Finance Limited, the Chairman
of Rawson Resources Limited and a former director of CPA Australia Limited and Kosciusko Alpine Club Limited.
Professor Paul Dougas B.Eng (Chem), M.Eng.Science, FAICD, CEng., Hon Fellow Engineers Australia
Independent Non-Executive Director
Professor Dougas was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 16 November 2011. He has 40 years of design,
process, project engineering, managerial, commercial and corporate experience having commenced his career in the Melbourne &
Metropolitan Board of Works before joining engineering firm Sinclair Knight Merz (“SKM”) in 1978. From initial technical roles, he soon
assumed leadership roles in Sydney before returning to Melbourne as Associate Director and Victorian Branch Manager in 1985. In
1995 he was appointed Managing Director Elect and Director of Marketing before becoming Chief Executive Officer and Managing
Director in 1996. For the next 15 years, he led a significant expansion of SKM locally and internationally involving more than 50 local and
international acquisitions. He also oversaw SKM’s expansion into South-East Asia with the opening of offices in Shanghai and Hong
Kong. During his leadership, SKM developed strong project alliances with major mining companies including BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto
and Vale Metals Group. Professor Dougas was a Non-Executive Director of ConnectEast Ltd from 2009 until its takeover in September
2011 and was also on the SKM Board from 1990 until 2011.
Peter Curry B.Comm, LLB, CA, FAICD
Alternate Director to Lee Seng Hui
Mr Curry was an Alternate Director until 25 September 2012. With over 35 years of business experience, he worked as Tax Partner
in Peat Marwick Mitchell (now known as “KPMG”) and thereafter in different listed and unlisted companies in Australia as executive
director or managing director specialising in natural resources, corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions. He has extensive
experience in public and private capital raisings, initial public offering related services and corporate and financial advisory services.
Mr Curry is a director of APAC Resources Limited, Sun Hung Kai & Co Limited and Ormil Energy Limited. During the past four years
Mr Curry has also served as a director of Forrest Enterprises Australia Limited.
Andrew Ferguson
Alternate Director to Lee Seng Hui
Mr Ferguson was appointed Alternate Director to Lee Seng Hui on 24 September 2012, replacing Mr Curry. Mr Ferguson is Chief
Executive Officer and an Executive Director of APAC Resources Ltd, one of Mount Gibson’s substantial shareholders. Mr Ferguson
holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Natural Resource Development and worked as a mining engineer in Western Australia in the mid
1990s. He has 14 years of experience in the finance industry specialising in global natural resources. In 2003, Mr Ferguson co-founded
New City Investment Managers in the United Kingdom. He was the former co-fund manager of City Natural Resources High Yield Trust,
and managed New City High Yield Trust Ltd and Geiger Counter Ltd. He has also worked as Chief Investment Officer for New City
Investment Managers CQS Hong Kong. Mr Ferguson is currently a Non-Executive Director of Metals X Limited and ABM Resources NL,
both of which are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.
coMpANY secretArY
David Stokes B.Bus, LLB, ACIS
Company Secretary and General Counsel
Mr Stokes was appointed Company Secretary and General Counsel in April 2012. He is a corporate lawyer with a diverse range of
mining and governance experience having worked at a corporate and operational level in the energy and resources sectors for over 15
years. Prior to joining Mount Gibson, Mr Stokes was General Counsel and Company Secretary at Gindalbie Metals Limited, Corporate
Counsel for Iluka Resources Limited and Resolute Mining Limited, and has also worked in private practice for a number of years.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
23
Directors’ report
corporAte iNForMAtioN
corporate structure
Mount Gibson is a company limited by shares that is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. It is the ultimate parent entity and has
prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year. The structure of the Group
as at 30 June 2013 was as follows:
Mount Gibson Iron Limited
ABN: 87 008 670 817
100%
100%
100%
Mount Gibson Mining Limited
ABN: 32 074 575 885
Aztec Resources Limited
ABN: 45 078 548 562
Geraldton Bulk Handling Pty Ltd
ABN: 45 100 105 388
100%
100%
100%
Brockman Minerals Pty Ltd
ABN: 75 094 634 401
Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd
ABN: 87 099 455 277
Koolan Shipping Pty Ltd
ACN: 110 647 848
Nature of operations and principal activities
The principal activities of the entities within the Group are:
•
•
•
mining and shipment of hematite iron ore at Koolan Island in the Kimberley region of Western Australia;
mining of hematite iron ore deposits at the Tallering Peak and Extension Hill mine sites in the Mid West region of Western Australia
and haulage of the ore via road and rail for sale from the Geraldton Port; and
exploration and development of hematite iron ore deposits at Koolan Island and in the Mid West region of Western Australia.
employees
The Group employed 599 employees (excluding contractors) as at 30 June 2013 (2012: 694 employees). The decrease in employees
from the prior year resulted from the cost reduction initiatives announced in October 2012.
operAtiNG AND FiNANciAL reVieW
introduction
The Board presents the 2012/13 Operating and Financial Review which has been prepared to provide shareholders with a clear and
concise overview of Mount Gibson’s operations, financial position, business strategies and prospects. This review also provides a
summary of the impact of key events which occurred in 2012/13 and the material business risks so that shareholders can make an
informed assessment of the results and prospects of the Group.
The review complements Mount Gibson’s financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2013 and has been prepared in accordance
with the recently released guidance set out in Regulatory Guidance 247 published by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission (“ASIC”).
overview of the 2012/13 financial year
Several significant developments occurred during the 2012/13 financial year.
Group ore sales increased 68% to a record 8.8 million wet metric tonnes (“wmt”) during the financial year. The increase reflected a
number of factors, including the sale of 709,000 wmt of Rizhao Special Product (“RSP”, previously referred to as mineralised waste)
from Koolan Island under the offtake agreement entered into with Rizhao Steel in October 2011. The increase also reflected the
commissioning of upgraded rail unloading and ore storage facilities at the Geraldton Port in mid-2012, and an upgrade of the regional
Mid-West rail network which resulted in improved rail availability from late 2012.
The significant increase in sales volumes was offset by a decline in the average iron ore price over the year, and increased price volatility.
In September 2012, the Platts CFR price for 62% Fe fines fell to a three year low of just under US$89/dmt, before recovering to peak
at US$159/dmt in January 2013. Mount Gibson achieved an average realised fines price, excluding sales of RSP, of US$108 per dry
metric tonne (“dmt”) Free On Board (“FOB”) for the year, compared with an average of US$124/dmt in 2011/12. This reflected a decline
in the average Platts CFR price (where the supplier pays shipping freight costs) for 62% Fe fines delivered to China from US$150/dmt
in 2011/12 to US$125/dmt in 2012/13.
In October 2012, following the rapid decline in iron ore prices described above and the anticipated ongoing price volatility, Mount
Gibson announced a range of business optimisation measures to reduce expenditure and position the business to operate in more
volatile market conditions. These initiatives were detailed in the Company’s Half Year Financial Report for the six months ended
31 December 2012, and included a manpower reduction of approximately 270 positions, primarily at Koolan Island, and reduced mining
activity to enable increased sales from ore stockpiles and provide time to complete the optimisation of the Koolan Island mine plan.
In March 2013, Mount Gibson announced the completion of the Koolan Island optimisation plan, which confirmed a staged ramp-up
in production to 4 million tonnes per annum by the end of calendar year 2014 as the most value accretive outcome for the Company.
The plan included a smoothing of the anticipated waste stripping profile and the identification of measures to achieve a significant
reduction in unit cash mining costs to between $8 and $10 per tonne of material moved as mining rates increased. The ramp-up, and
staged recruitment of approximately 100 workers, commenced in April 2013.
24
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
The Company also made significant progress with respect to other business development initiatives.
The rebuilding of the Company’s executive team was completed in September 2012 with the commencement of Mr Peter Kerr as the
Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Mr Andrew Thomson as Chief Operating Officer.
At 30 June 2013, the Company’s cash and term deposits totalled $376,018,000 compared with $292,678,000 at the end of June 2012.
In March 2013, the Company announced a maiden mineral resource estimate for the T1 satellite deposit at Tallering Peak, and
commenced detailed mine planning. Subsequent to year-end in July 2013, Mount Gibson announced Probable Ore Reserves for T1 of
801,000 tonnes grading 61.0% Fe, with the first ore scheduled to be extracted in September 2013. Development of T1, and optimisation
of the existing main T6 pit, is now expected to extend mining operations at Tallering Peak by approximately one year to mid-2014.
Tallering Peak is now expected to achieve total ore sales of approximately 2.5 million wmt in 2013/14, including approximately 700,000
wmt of stockpiled lower grade ore.
In April 2013, Mount Gibson also completed the acquisition of a substantial exploration landholding at Field’s Find, approximately 60
kilometres north of Extension Hill, for an upfront payment of $500,000. The landholding covers 250 square kilometres and is considered
highly prospective for iron ore, gold and base metals. The package includes the Plateau iron prospect where drilling by the previous
owner intersected shallow hematite/goethite iron mineralisation on a plateau covering an area of approximately 12 square kilometres.
In early 2013, Mount Gibson also completed a detailed review of previous exploration data from the Extension Hill South area, on
granted mining leases immediately south of the Extension Hill mine. This review confirmed the area as having significant potential to
host additional DSO iron resources. Applications to obtain exploration access were submitted in the June quarter of 2013, and Mount
Gibson anticipates field work will commence in the September quarter of 2013.
In late June 2013, Mount Gibson also commenced an initial helicopter-supported reconnaissance program on the Koolan South
tenement, located on the Kimberley mainland immediately south of Koolan Island. The tenement was granted in October 2012 and is
considered prospective for iron ore and base metals. The initial reconnaissance program represented the first substantial exploration
activity undertaken on the tenement in approximately 15 years.
operating results for the financial year
For the year ended 30 June 2013, Mount Gibson achieved a net profit before tax of $128,440,000 and, after recording a normal tax
expense of $35,559,000 and a tax benefit of $64,461,000 relating to recognition of the Company’s starting base for the purposes of the
Australian Minerals and Resource Rent Tax (MRRT), a net profit after tax of $157,342,000. Excluding the tax benefit attributable to the
MRRT, the net profit after tax for the period was $92,881,000.
Year ended:
Net profit before tax
Taxation benefit/(expense)
Net profit after tax
Earnings per share
30 June
2013
Restated*
30 June
2012
30 June
2011
30 June
2010
30 June
2009
128,440
224,621
342,888
188,308
61,709
28,902
(62,605)
(103,388)
(55,913)
(19,091)
$’000
157,342
162,016
239,500
132,395
$/share
0.1445
0.1496
0.2214
0.1230
42,618
0.0456
* Restated to reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as detailed in Note 1(e) of the 2012/13 financial statements. Amounts in prior years
are not restated.
Consolidated quarterly operating and sales statistics for the 2012/13 financial year are tabulated below:
Sept Qtr
2012
Dec Qtr
2012
Mar Qtr
2013
Jun Qtr
2013
2012/13
2011/12
Mining and crushing
Total waste mined
Total ore mined
Total ore crushed
Shipping/sales^
Lump*
Fines
RSP
Total
Ave. Platts 62%Fe
CFR price
MGX FOB Ave.
realised fines price**
kwmt = thousand wet metric tonnes
kwmt
kwmt
kwmt
kwmt
kwmt
kwmt
kwmt
US$/dmt
US$/dmt
9,376
1,643
1,930
895
864
-
1,759
113
110
4,650
1,923
2,254
1,317
1,068
283
2,668
122
96
2,721
1,294
1,889
750
1,102
148
2,000
148
117
5,574
948
1,585
1,230
834
279
2,343
126
107
22,321
40,987
5,808
7,658
4,193
3,869
709
8,771
127
108
7,275
6,943
2,382
2,830
-
5,212
150
124
^ Includes mine gate sales totalling 42kwmt of DSO lump and 134kwmt of DSO fines in the June 2013 quarter.
*
Includes the sale of 115kwmt of lower grade DSO lump in the September 2012 quarter and 115kwmt in the June 2013 quarter.
** Reflects the realised fines price for standard DSO fine ore only, after adjustments for shipping freight and grade. Contract pricing in the year was based on a mix of lagging-
monthly and month-of-shipment averages.
Minor discrepancies may appear due to rounding.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
25
Directors’ report
Koolan island
The Koolan Island iron ore mine is located on Koolan Island in the Buccaneer Archipelago of Yampi Sound in the Kimberley region of
Western Australia. The mine was originally opened by BHP in 1965 and operated until 1993. Mount Gibson acquired and reopened the
mine in 2007.
The 2012/13 financial year was one of significant transition at Koolan Island. This reflected the major operational restructure and
temporary mining slowdown announced in October 2012 in response to volatile market conditions, and the need to complete mine
optimisation work which in April 2013 confirmed a staged ramp-up in production to 4 million tonnes per annum as the most value
accretive outcome for the Group.
Waste movement and ore production were significantly lower in 2012/13, due to the planned mining slow-down and the adverse effects
of unseasonal rain in the June 2013 quarter. Full year ore sales, however, were increased 22% to 3.5 million wmt, reflecting increased
sales from ore stockpiles early in the financial year and the commencement of RSP shipments in October 2012. RSP sales totalled
709,000 wmt for the year.
The most significant development at Koolan Island was the commencement of the mining ramp-up in April 2013 in order to achieve
annualised ore production of 4 million tonnes per annum by the end of calendar year 2014. Consequently, waste mining increased
significantly in the June 2013 quarter and unit cash mining costs began to decline, in line with the ramp-up plan. In the month of June,
unit cash mining costs were approximately 11% lower than the average achieved in the December 2012 half year, reflecting increased
productivity levels.
Concurrent with the mining ramp-up commencement, a major maintenance shutdown of the crushing circuit was undertaken and
construction of a new maintenance workshop was further advanced.
In addition, further detailed geotechnical evaluation at the end of the financial year reduced expected ongoing sustaining capital
expenditure for pit wall geotechnical support to less than $10 million per annum, being 50% lower than initial estimates.
As at 30 June 2013, crushed DSO stockpiles at Koolan Island totalled approximately 67,000 wmt, and uncrushed DSO stockpiles
totalled 134,000 wmt.
Production
summary
Mining
Waste mined
Ore mined
Crushing
Lump
Fines
RSP*
Shipping
Lump
Fines
RSP*
Unit
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
Sept Qtr
2012
’000
Dec Qtr
2012
’000
Mar Qtr
2013
’000
Jun Qtr
2013
’000
Year
2012/13
’000
Year
2011/12
’000
%
Incr/
(decr)
5,373
555
2,668
707
1,256
460
4,033
134
13,330
1,856
20,750
2,959
232
464
97
793
151
635
-
786
254
396
263
913
364
651
283
1,298
170
352
224
746
217
435
148
800
27
40
267
334
213
87
279
578
683
1,252
851
2,787
945
1,807
709
3,461
(36%)
(37%)
(45%)
(35%)
-
1,252
1,912
-
3,164
(12%)
1,012
1,831
-
2,843
(7%)
(1%)
-
22%
* Rizhao Special Product (“RSP”). Minor discrepancies may appear due to rounding.
In accordance with the Company’s stated accounting policy, deferred waste expenditure for the period has been capitalised in the
Group’s Balance Sheet and will be amortised on a units of production basis. Expenditure on waste development at Koolan Island during
the financial year was as follows:
Waste mined
Waste mined
Ore mined
Ore mined
Deferred waste capitalised
Amortisation of deferred waste
12 Months ended
30 June 2013
12 Months ended
30 June 2012
mill bcm
mill wmt
mill bcm
mill wmt
$ mill
$ mill
5.43
13.33
0.48
1.86
97.10
46.15
8.40
20.75
0.77
2.96
147.07*
46.77*
* Restated to reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as detailed in Note 1(e) of the 2012/13 financial statements.
26
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
tallering peak
The Tallering Peak mine is located approximately 130 kilometres north east of Geraldton in the Mid West region of Western Australia.
Ore is mined, crushed and screened on-site, transported by sealed road 65 kilometres to Mullewa, where it is loaded onto rail wagons
and railed 107 kilometres to the Geraldton Port.
Tallering Peak performed well during 2012/13 in what was previously expected to be its final year of operation.
Total material movement declined substantially, reflecting the approaching completion of mining in the main T6 pit, while the operation
also benefited from operating improvements implemented in October 2012 and the completion of regional rail upgrades in late 2012.
Ore production increased 10% to 2.1 million wmt, while ore sales increased 60% to 2.5 million wmt, including the sale of approximately
230,000 wmt of lower grade lump DSO from crushed ore stockpiles at the Mullewa rail siding.
Substantial additional value was also realised at Tallering Peak through the successful definition of the T1 Mineral Resource and Ore
Reserve, located one kilometre east of the main T6 pit, and further optimisation of the T6 final pit design.
As a result, mining in the T6 pit is now expected to continue until January 2014, and first ore from the T1 deposit is scheduled for
September 2013. These two initiatives will extend mining operations at Tallering Peak by approximately one year to mid-2014.
Tallering Peak is now forecast to achieve total ore sales of approximately 2.5 million wmt in 2013/14, including the sale of approximately
700,000 wmt of stockpiled lower grade ore. All ore sales from Tallering Peak are presently expected to be concluded in the September
quarter of 2014.
As at 30 June 2013, approximately 218,000 wmt of crushed standard product were stockpiled at the mine, in addition to stockpiles of
approximately 29,000 wmt of uncrushed standard product. Uncrushed stocks of lower grade ore at the mine totalled approximately
335,000 wmt. At the Mullewa rail siding, stockpiles of crushed standard product totalled approximately 182,000 wmt, while stockpiles
of crushed lower grade lump material totalled approximately 647,000 wmt.
Production
summary
Mining
Waste mined
Ore mined
Crushing
Lump
Fines
Unit
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
Transported to Mullewa Railhead
Lump
Fines
wmt
wmt
Transported to Geraldton Port
Lump
Fines
Shipping
Lump
Fines
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
Minor discrepancies may appear due to rounding.
Sept Qtr
2012
’000
Dec Qtr
2012
’000
Mar Qtr
2013
’000
Jun Qtr
2013
’000
Year
2012/13
’000
Year
2011/12
’000
%
Incr/
(decr)
3,076
558
1,387
627
320
184
504
275
140
415
260
154
414
275
113
388
428
247
675
389
225
614
449
150
599
592
178
771
820
517
396
246
642
411
245
656
385
302
687
353
241
594
832
445
365
218
583
397
216
613
537
276
813
487
310
797
6,115
2,146
1,509
895
2,404
1,472
826
2,298
1,631
882
2,513
1,707
842
2,550
16,888
1,949
(64%)
10%
1,166
967
2,133
1,328
839
2,167
880
737
1,617
831
763
1,594
29%
(7%)
13%
11%
(2%)
6%
85%
20%
55%
105%
10%
60%
In accordance with the Company’s stated accounting policy, deferred waste expenditure for the period has been capitalised in the
Group’s Balance Sheet and will be amortised on a units of production basis. Expenditure on waste development at Tallering Peak
during the financial year was as follows:
Waste mined
Waste mined
Ore mined
Ore mined
Deferred waste capitalised
Amortisation of deferred waste
12 Months ended
30 June 2013
12 Months ended
30 June 2012
mill bcm
mill wmt
mill bcm
mill wmt
$ mill
$ mill
2.04
6.12
0.52
2.15
3.81
51.39
5.77
16.89
0.47
1.95
62.50*
6.51*
* Restated to reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as detailed in Note 1(e) of the 2012/13 financial statements.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
27
Directors’ report
extension Hill
The Extension Hill mine is located in the Mount Gibson Ranges, 85 kilometres east of Perenjori and 260 kilometres east south east of
Geraldton in the Mid West region of Western Australia. The project has similar operational characteristics to Tallering Peak, with ore
mined, crushed and screened on-site, transported by sealed road 85 kilometres to Perenjori, where it is loaded onto rail wagons and
railed 240 kilometres to the Geraldton Port. Mining commenced at Extension Hill in the 2011/12 financial year.
The Extension Hill mine performed strongly in 2012/13, reflecting the commissioning of upgraded rail unloading and ore storage facilities
at the Geraldton Port in mid-2012, and the completion of a regional rail network upgrade in late 2012.
Production
summary
Mining
Waste mined
Ore mined
Crushing
Lump
Fines
Unit
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
Transported to Perenjori Railhead
Lump
Fines
wmt
wmt
Transported to Geraldton Port
Lump (Rail)
Lump (Road)
Fines (Rail)
Shipping
Lump
Fines
Mine gate sales
Lump
Fines
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
wmt
Minor discrepancies may appear due to rounding.
Sept Qtr
2012
’000
Dec Qtr
2012
’000
Mar Qtr
2013
’000
Jun Qtr
2013
’000
Year
2012/13
’000
Year
2011/12
’000
%
Incr/(decr)
927
530
387
246
633
428
166
594
464
-
61
525
469
116
585
-
-
-
595
589
371
295
666
339
285
624
410
-
320
730
361
239
600
-
-
-
645
317
281
220
501
262
336
598
199
-
426
625
180
426
606
-
-
-
709
370
381
286
667
330
269
599
442
-
249
691
488
304
792
42
134
176
2,876
1,805
1,420
1,047
2,467
1,359
1,056
2,415
1,515
-
1,056
2,571
1,498
1,085
2,583
42
134
176
3,349
2,368
1,033
613
1,646
919
519
1,438
484
62
298
844
539
236
775
-
-
-
(14%)
(24%)
37%
71%
50%
48%
103%
68%
213%
(100%)
254%
205%
178%
360%
233%
-
-
-
Ore production of 1.8 million wmt was lower than in the previous year, reflecting the operational focus on reducing expenditure and
maximising the drawdown of ore stockpiles built up due to infrastructure constraints during the previous financial year.
Expenditure on waste development at Extension Hill during the financial year was as follows:
Waste mined
Waste mined
Ore mined
Ore mined
Deferred waste capitalised
Amortisation of deferred waste
12 Months ended
30 June 2013
12 Months ended
30 June 2012
mill bcm
mill wmt
mill bcm
mill wmt
$ mill
$ mill
1.15
2.88
0.62
1.81
-
-
1.36
3.35
0.80
2.37
-*
-*
* Restated to reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as detailed in Note 1(e) of the 2012/13 financial statements.
Total sales in the mine’s first full year of shipping consequently increased significantly to 2.8 million tonnes. The full year total included
mine gate sales to an unrelated party of 176,000 tonnes of DSO in the June 2013 quarter made possible under a short-term opportunity
to utilise available third party rail capacity in excess of the Company’s allocated train paths from the Perenjori rail siding.
28
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
Mine gate sales were priced on a Free on Train basis, reflecting the prevailing market price less rail, port and shipping costs (which are
incurred by the purchaser). These sales delivered Mount Gibson a cash margin comparable to conventional DSO shipments from the
Geraldton Port.
At 30 June 2013, stockpiles of crushed finished product at the Perenjori rail siding totalled approximately 295,000 wmt. At the mine site,
stockpiles of uncrushed product ready for crushing totalled approximately 446,000 wmt, while stockpiles of crushed finished product
totalled 169,000 wmt. Minesite stockpiles of uncrushed lower grade material totalled 1.8 million wmt.
Financial position
During the course of the financial year, the Group’s mining operations performed well in a volatile iron ore price environment. Cash
flows from operating activities totalled $179,652,000, a significant improvement on the prior financial year operating cash flows of
$56,169,000, driven by increased sales volumes.
At 30 June 2013, the Group’s cash and term deposit balances totalled $376,018,000, an increase of $83,340,000 from the prior year’s
closing balance of $292,678,000. This increase was achieved after the payment of $40,004,000 in cash dividends, $54,092,000 in
income taxes and $27,189,000 in the repayment of lease liabilities and other borrowings.
Accordingly, as at 30 June 2013, Mount Gibson had a robust working capital position with limited borrowings in the form of equipment
lease and hire purchase liabilities totalling $28,392,000.
As at the date of this report, the Group has sufficient funds as well as access to further equity and debt funding to operate and sell iron
ore from the Koolan Island, Tallering Peak and Extension Hill mines, and to advance its exploration and growth objectives.
income tax
Mount Gibson has in prior periods had the benefit of taxation arrangements for the treatment of provisional invoices for the sale of
iron ore. These arrangements have now ended and, accordingly, revenue which was previously deferred for tax purposes from the
prior financial year will be assessed in the 2013 financial year. The expected corporate taxation arising from cessation of the previous
arrangements has been reflected in the results for the 2013 financial year.
early adoption of new deferred waste stripping requirements
Mount Gibson has elected to early adopt the new Australian and international accounting requirements for waste stripping activities in
the operating phase of an open pit mine. The new accounting requirements result in the capitalisation of only a portion of waste stripping
costs where the benefit of such stripping activity is the improved access to components of the orebody in future periods. Capitalised
waste stripping costs are amortised over the remaining ore reserves of the relevant ore component being mined. In accordance with the
transitional provisions of the new requirements, this new policy has been applied from the start of the prior comparative period, being
1 July 2011, resulting in the restatement of the prior period’s results.
Minerals resource rent tax (Mrrt)
Based on updated internal modelling, Mount Gibson does not currently expect to pay any MRRT over the life of its current operating
mines. It is expected that Mount Gibson will utilise a portion of its MRRT starting base allowances to offset any MRRT which might
otherwise arise and, accordingly, a deferred tax asset and a corresponding reduction in tax expense has been recognised in the year.
Mount Gibson’s accounting treatment relating to MRRT remains dependent on future iron ore prices, foreign exchange rates and
operating costs.
Likely developments and expected results
Mount Gibson’s overall objective is to maintain and grow long-term profitability through the discovery, development, operation and
acquisition of mineral resources. As an established producer and seller of hematite iron ore, Mount Gibson’s strategy is to maintain and
grow its profile as a successful and profitable supplier of raw materials to the global carbon steels sector.
Mount Gibson’s strategic priority is to operate its existing mines in a responsible manner in order to generate maximum cash flows from
each operation. Accordingly, over the last 12 months, Mount Gibson management has made a series of fundamental changes to the
Group’s operations in order to create a solid base from which its operations can continue to perform well in volatile commodity and
foreign exchange markets. For the coming 2013/14 financial year, Mount Gibson expects to grow its annual sales to between 9.0 and
9.5 million wmt of iron ore.
Key influences on the success of Mount Gibson are not only iron ore and foreign exchange prices but also consistency in government
policy, the continued attainment of regulatory approvals, the ability to delineate new mineral resources and ore reserves, and the
continued control of operating and capital costs. Looking forward, a key focus of the Mount Gibson management team is therefore
continued reductions in unit operating costs and the pursuit of production efficiencies across its operating mine sites. In addition,
priority has been placed on the search for new mineral resources which would provide low capital mine life extensions for its mines, in
particular the Extension Hill operation.
Mount Gibson has a growth ambition in the carbon steels sector, in particular in the bulk commodities of iron ore and metallurgical coal.
The Board and management team therefore continuously assesses possible acquisition opportunities for assets which would grow
the Company’s production and extend its cash flow profile beyond the life of its current mining operations. Mount Gibson is particularly
focused on low capital intensity projects, preferably within Australia or comparable political risk regions, which are of an affordable size
to acquire and develop, as appropriate. Potential acquisition opportunities are assessed against a base case scenario of Mount Gibson
continuing to operate its existing mines well and generate optimal investment returns.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
29
Directors’ report
siGNiFicANt eVeNts AFter BALANce DAte
On 22 August 2013, the Company declared a final dividend on ordinary shares in respect of the 2012/13 financial year of $0.02 per
share fully franked. The total amount of the dividend is $21,812,000. The dividend has not been provided for in the 30 June 2013
financial statements.
Subsequent to the end of the period, the Board approved the award of certain amounts under the Company’s Short Term and Long
Term Incentive Plans to members of executive management team. These amounts have been included in the financial statements and
Directors’ Report for the year.
Apart from the above, as at the date of this report there are no significant events after balance date of the Company or of the Group that
require adjustment of or disclosure in this report.
iNDeMNiFicAtioN AND iNsUrANce oF Directors AND oFFicers
The Company has, during current or previous financial periods, entered into deeds of access and indemnity with certain Directors.
These deeds provide access to documentation and indemnification against liability for loss suffered, as a result of any act or omission,
to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001, from conduct of the Group’s business.
During the financial year, the Company paid a premium in respect of a contract insuring the Directors of the Company, the Company
Secretary and all executive officers of the Company and of any related body corporate against a liability incurred as such a Director,
Company Secretary or executive officer to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001.
The Directors have not included details of the nature of the liabilities covered or the amount of the premium paid in respect of the
Directors’ and officers’ liability and legal expenses’ insurance contracts, as such disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract.
The Company has not otherwise, during or since the end of the financial year, except to the extent permitted by law, indemnified or
agreed to indemnify an officer or auditor of the Company or any related body corporate against a liability incurred as such an officer or
auditor.
sHAre optioNs
Unissued shares
There are no options over ordinary shares in the Company on issue as at balance date and at the date of this report.
shares issued as a result of the exercise of options
There were no options exercised or forfeited during the financial year or to the date of this report.
DiViDeNDs
During the financial year, dividends of $43,526,253 (2012: $64,957,156) were paid as follows:
•
•
A final dividend of 2 cents per share fully franked in respect of the 2011/12 financial year was paid by way of $18,192,154 in cash
and 4,855,802 new shares issued under the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan; and
An interim dividend of 2 cents per share fully franked in respect of the 2012/13 financial year was paid in cash totalling $21,811,685.
A final dividend of 2.0 cents fully franked has been declared for the year ended 30 June 2013. Refer “Significant Events After Balance
Date” above.
With the declaration of this final dividend for the 2012/13 financial year, Mount Gibson has now paid $130,295,000 in dividends since
its maiden dividend in September 2011.
Directors’ iNterests iN tHe sHAres AND optioNs oF tHe coMpANY
As at the date of this report, the interests of the Directors in the shares and options of the Company were:
Ordinary shares
Options over shares
Performance rights
over shares
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
A Ferguson
70,000
-
100,000
-
-
-
20,000
203,866
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
Directors’ MeetiNGs
The number of meetings of Directors (including meetings of Committees of Directors) held during the year and the number of meetings
attended by each Director are as follows:
Directors’
meetings
Audit and Risk
Management
Committee
Nomination,
Remuneration
and Governance
Committee
Operational Risk
and Sustainability
Committee
Contracts
Committee
Number of meetings held
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
P Curry[1]
A Ferguson[2]
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
7
6
-
-
4
4
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
[1] Mr Curry was an Alternate Director to Mr Lee until 25 September 2012.
[2] Mr Ferguson was appointed as an Alternate Director to Mr Lee from 24 September 2012.
eNViroNMeNtAL reGULAtioN AND perForMANce
6
6
-
6
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
-
2
-
-
2
-
-
2
2
2
-
-
The Group has developed Environmental Management Plans for its operations at Koolan Island, Tallering Peak and Extension Hill. The
Environmental Management Plans have been approved by the Western Australian Government Departments of Mines and Petroleum,
Environment and Conservation and where applicable the Department of Health. In addition, plans associated with specific species have
been approved by the federal Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has also granted approval for the sites’ Environmental Management Plans. In addition,
the Department of Environment and Conservation has granted approval of environmental works to allow construction of “prescribed”
facilities and the Department of Mines and Petroleum has granted approval for Mining Proposals at each of the three mine sites.
The Group holds various environmental licences and authorities, issued under both State and Federal law, to regulate its mining and
exploration activities in Australia. These licences include conditions and regulations in relation to specifying limits on discharges into the
environment, rehabilitation of areas disturbed during the course of mining, exploration activities, tenement conditions associated with
exploration and mining and the storage of hazardous substances.
There have been no material breaches of the Group’s licences. A formal letter of warning was received following a site inspection of
Koolan Island conducted in September 2012 by the Western Australian Department of Environment Regulation (“DER”). The letter was
given for alleged breaches of a number of licence conditions and, following work conducted by Mount Gibson to remediate the areas
of concern, the DER acknowledged the actions undertaken.
The Group continues to report under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) Act 2009. Diesel combustion is the
largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.
proceeDiNGs oN BeHALF oF tHe coMpANY
There are no proceedings on behalf of the Company under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 in the financial year or at the date
of this report.
roUNDiNG
Amounts in this report and the accompanying financial report have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($’000) unless
otherwise stated under the option available to the company under ASIC Class Order 98/0100. The Company is an entity to which the
class order applies.
cUrreNcY
Amounts in this report and the accompanying financial report are presented in Australian dollars unless otherwise stated.
corporAte GoVerNANce
The Company’s Corporate Governance Statement is contained in the Additional ASX Information section of the Annual Report.
AUDitor’s iNDepeNDeNce DecLArAtioN
In accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, the Directors received the attached Independence Declaration from the
auditor of the Company on page 39 which forms part of this Report.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
31
Directors’ report
NoN-AUDit serVices
The following non-audit services were provided by the Company’s auditor, EY, during the financial year ended 30 June 2013. The
Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors
imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The nature and scope of each type of non-audit service provided means that auditor
independence was not compromised. EY received or is due to receive the following amounts for the provision of non-audit services:
Native title royalty audit
Agreed upon procedures engagement
Insurance review
2013
$
3,500
4,635
5,150
13,285
reMUNerAtioN report (AUDiteD)
This report outlines the remuneration arrangements in place for Directors and Key Management Personnel of the Group in accordance
with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and its Regulations.
For the purposes of this report Key Management Personnel of the Group are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility
for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Directors of the Company.
Nomination, remuneration and Governance committee (“NrGc”)
The NRGC comprises three independent Non-Executive Directors, being Messrs Hill (Chairman), Jones and Barwick.
The NRGC of the Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for determining and reviewing remuneration arrangements for the
Board and Key Management Personnel.
The NRGC assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of Key Management Personnel on a periodic basis
by reference to relevant employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the
retention of a high quality, high performing Board and executive team.
remuneration policy
The Remuneration Policy of the Group has been put in place to ensure that:
•
•
•
remuneration policies and systems support the Company’s wider objectives and strategies;
Directors’ and senior executives’ remuneration is aligned to the long-term interests of shareholders within an appropriate control
framework; and
there is a clear relationship between the executives’ performance and remuneration.
remuneration structure
In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of Non-Executive Director and senior executive management
remuneration is separate.
Non-executive Director remuneration
Objective
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the Company with the ability to attract and retain Directors of
the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost which is acceptable to shareholders.
Structure
The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate remuneration of Non-Executive Directors shall be determined
from time to time by a general meeting of shareholders. An amount not exceeding the amount determined is then divided between
the Non-Executive Directors as agreed. The latest determination was at the Annual General Meeting held on 16 November 2011 when
Shareholders approved an aggregate remuneration of $1,250,000 per year.
Each Non-Executive Director receives a fee for being a Director of the Company.
Non-Executive Directors should be adequately remunerated for their time and effort and the risks involved. Non-Executive Directors are
remunerated to recognise the responsibilities, accountabilities and associated risks of Directors.
Each Non-Executive Director’s performance and remuneration is reviewed on an annual basis by the Chairman and NRGC.
Non-Executive Directors’ fixed remuneration will comprise the following elements:
•
•
cash remuneration; and
superannuation contributions made by the Company.
Board operating costs do not form part of Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration.
Amount
With the price volatility experienced during the first half of the financial year, and as part of the Company’s overall cost reduction
program, the Board of Directors of the Company agreed to a 10% reduction in Directors’ fees for the year.
32
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
senior executives’ remuneration
Objective
The Company aims to reward senior executives with a level and mix of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities
within the Company and so as to:
•
•
•
•
reward senior executives for Company and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
align the interests of senior executives with those of shareholders;
link reward with the strategic goals and performance of the Company; and
ensure total remuneration is competitive by market standards.
Fixed remuneration
The components of the senior executives’ fixed remuneration are determined individually and may include:
•
•
•
•
•
cash remuneration;
superannuation;
accommodation and travel benefits;
motor vehicle, parking and other benefits; and
reimbursement of entertainment, home office and telephone expenses.
The senior executives’ remuneration is reviewed on an annual basis by the Chief Executive Officer, whose remuneration is reviewed
annually by the NRGC.
In determining the remuneration package, the NRGC reviews the individual’s remuneration with the use of market data for positions
with comparable companies. Where appropriate, the package is adjusted so as to keep pace with market trends and ensure continued
remuneration competitiveness. In conducting a comparative analysis, the Company’s expected performance for the year is considered
in the context of the Company’s capacity to fund remuneration budgets.
Use of remuneration consultants
The NRGC from time to time seeks advice from independent remuneration consultants regarding senior executives’ remuneration
structures and levels. Such consultants are engaged by, and report directly to, the NRGC, and are required to confirm in writing their
independence from the Group’s senior and other executives.
During the year, the NRGC sought advice from Egan Associates regarding market data in relation to senior executives’ remuneration
packages and incentive structures. The recommendations were provided to the NRGC as an input to the decision-making process, and
the NRGC considered these recommendations, along with other factors, in making its remuneration decisions and recommendations
to the Board. The fees paid to Egan Associates during the year totalled $22,680 and no other services were provided by Egan
Associates. The NRGC and Board are satisfied the advice received was free from undue influence from the senior executives to whom
the remuneration recommendations applied, and Egan Associates confirmed this in writing to the NRGC.
Variable remuneration
Short-term incentives (“STI”)
The senior executives may receive variable remuneration in the form of STI of up to one half of their annual salary package. STI payments
are linked to defined performance measures and provide rewards for completing actions and objectives that are expected to materially
improve Company performance. The total potential STI available for award is ultimately at the Board’s discretion but is measured to
provide sufficient incentive to the senior executives to achieve the objectives set such that the cost to the Group is reasonable in the
circumstances.
The performance measures comprise a combination of group and individual measures, chosen to align the interests of senior
executives with shareholders, representing the key drivers for short-term success of the business and providing a framework for delivering
long-term value.
Group and individual performance measures are weighted and specify performance required to meet or exceed expectations.
The Group performance measures for the 2012/13 STI were:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: objectives relate to reduction in the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) and implementation of corporate risk
and safety management processes and projects.
Production: objectives relate to delivering at or beyond planned ore sales.
Costs: objectives relate to delivering at or below planned cost levels and implementation of cost management and operational
efficiency programs.
Capital: objectives relate to delivering at or below the agreed program of expenditure.
Ore reserve/mineral resource addition: objectives relate to maintaining and growing the mineral resource and ore reserve base.
Organisation development: objectives relate to organisational reviews and implementation of performance management and
talent management programs designed to improve organisational effectiveness.
Corporate growth: objectives relate to the development of growth options.
These Group measures are cascaded into individual performance measures for each senior executive, depending upon the executive’s
role and area of responsibility. In addition to these cascaded group measures, executives have personal performance measures which
are role-specific and focus on areas or projects above and beyond the performance expected on a day to day basis. The focus of the
personal measures is to improve business effectiveness. Individual performance measures are agreed annually and documented in the
Company’s performance review process.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
33
Directors’ report
On an annual basis, the individual performance of each senior executive is reviewed after consideration of the executive’s performance
against individual performance measures. This process usually occurs prior to or just after the reporting date. The NRGC then
determines the amount of STI to be allocated to each executive. Payments made are delivered as a cash bonus prior to or just after
the reporting date.
For the 2013 financial year, a total STI cash bonus of $877,537 was approved, of which $110,000 was paid during the year and $767,537
was paid after year end.
Long-term incentive (“LTI”) for 2013 financial year
The Company established the Mount Gibson Iron Limited Performance Rights Plan (“PRP”) in the 2008 financial year. Under the
PRP, the Board may invite eligible executives to apply for performance rights, which are an entitlement to receive ordinary shares
in the Company, subject to satisfaction by the executive of specified performance hurdles set by the Board. The rights are granted
at no cost to the executives and will convert into ordinary shares on completion by the executive of three years’ continuous service,
subject to satisfaction of specified performance hurdles. Current LTI awards are issued and tested for vesting against the Company’s
Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) relative to the TSR of a comparator group of companies over the same period. The PRP provides its
executives with long-term incentives linked between the delivery of value to shareholders, financial performance and rewarding and
retaining the executives. The Board is currently undertaking a review of the hurdles within the PRP and may consider modification of
the hurdles in future periods.
The employment contracts for the Chief Executive Officer, Mr Beyer, the Company Secretary and General Counsel, Mr Stokes, the
Chief Financial Officer, Mr Kerr and the Chief Operating Officer, Mr Thomson, incorporate payment of a LTI. Under their employment
contracts, these executives may each year be invited to apply for, and the Company will grant, a number of performance rights
equivalent to up to one third of their respective base salaries (including superannuation) divided by the volume weighted average price
of the Company’s shares as traded on ASX for the 30 day period prior to 30 June for the relevant year.
As part of the overall cost reduction program commenced during the year, by mutual consent with the senior executives, the LTI award
was reduced by an average of 55% in order to achieve the committed 10% reduction in total executive remuneration.
At year end, 633,590 performance rights were granted by the Company to senior executives in respect of the 2012/13 financial year.
The Company has a policy restricting executives from entering into arrangements to protect the value of unvested LTI entitlements
under equity-based remuneration plans.
employment contracts
As at the date of this report, the Group had entered into employment contracts with the following executives:
Jim Beyer
The key terms of his contract include:
•
•
•
•
•
Commenced 14 May 2012 with no set term;
Annual Salary Package increase by minimum of CPI from 1 July every year. Mr Beyer waived this increase as part of the Company’s
cost reduction program;
STI bonus of up to one half of Annual Salary Package;
LTI bonus of up to one third of Annual Salary Package; and
If the Company wishes to terminate the contract other than if Mr Beyer is guilty of any grave misconduct, serious or persistent
breach of the terms of the contract or wilful neglect in the discharge of his duties, the Company is obliged to pay out 12 months
Annual Salary Package plus any other accrued entitlements and bonuses. If Mr Beyer wishes to terminate the contract, he must
provide six months’ notice.
David Stokes
The key terms of his contract include:
•
•
•
•
•
Commenced 2 April 2012 with no set term;
Annual Salary Package increase by minimum of CPI from 1 July every year;
STI bonus of up to one half of Annual Salary Package;
LTI bonus of up to one third of Annual Salary Package; and
If the Company wishes to terminate the contract other than if Mr Stokes is guilty of any grave misconduct, serious or persistent
breach of the terms of the contract or wilful neglect in the discharge of his duties, the Company is obliged to pay out 12 months
Annual Salary Package plus any other accrued entitlements and bonuses. If Mr Stokes wishes to terminate the contract, he must
provide six months’ notice.
Peter Kerr
The key terms of his contract include:
•
•
•
•
•
Commenced 19 September 2012 with no set term;
Annual Salary Package increase by minimum of CPI from 1 July every year;
STI bonus of up to one half of Annual Salary Package;
LTI bonus of up to one third of Annual Salary Package; and
If the Company wishes to terminate the contract other than if Mr Kerr is guilty of any grave misconduct, serious or persistent
breach of the terms of the contract or wilful neglect in the discharge of his duties, the Company is obliged to pay out 12 months
Annual Salary Package plus any other accrued entitlements and bonuses. If Mr Kerr wishes to terminate the contract, he must
provide six months’ notice.
34
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
Andrew Thomson
The key terms of his contract include:
•
•
•
•
•
Commenced 18 September 2012 with no set term;
Annual Salary Package increase by minimum of CPI from 1 July every year;
STI bonus of up to one half of Annual Salary Package;
LTI bonus of up to one third of Annual Salary Package; and
If the Company wishes to terminate the contract other than if Mr Thomson is guilty of any grave misconduct, serious or persistent
breach of the terms of the contract or wilful neglect in the discharge of his duties, the Company is obliged to pay out 12 months
Annual Salary Package plus any other accrued entitlements and bonuses. If Mr Thomson wishes to terminate the contract, he
must provide six months’ notice.
Details of Directors and Key Management personnel disclosed in this report
[i] Directors
Non-Executive Director, Chairman
G Hill
Non-Executive Deputy Chairman (from 14 December 2012) and Non-Executive Director (until 14 December 2012)
Lee SH
Non-Executive Director
A Jones
Non-Executive Director
Chen Z
Li S
Non-Executive Director
R Barwick Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
S Bird
Non-Executive Director
P Dougas
P Curry
Alternate Director to Mr Lee (until 25 September 2012)
A Ferguson Alternate Director to Mr Lee (from 24 September 2012)
[ii] Key Management Personnel
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer (from 19 September 2012)
Acting Chief Financial Officer (from 1 July 2012 to 19 September 2012)
J Beyer
P Kerr
K Bozanic
A Thomson Chief Operating Officer (from 18 September 2012)
K Faulkner
D Stokes
Acting Chief Operating Officer (from 17 April 2012 to 18 September 2012)
Company Secretary and General Counsel
remuneration of Key Management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2013
Short term
Post employment
Long term
Non
monetary
Cash
bonuses
Super-
annuation
Retirement
benefits
Long service
leave
Share-based
payment
Termination
payment
Options and
performance
rights
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
$
%
Performance
related
Salary
& fees
$
179,816
81,345
102,232
88,196
81,345
Directors
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
105,718
S Bird
P Dougas
98,929
99,067
Sub-total
836,648
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16,183
7,321
9,201
7,938
7,321
9,515
8,904
8,916
75,299
25,000
17,872
14,661
25,033
-
Other KMP
J Beyer
P Kerr
K Bozanic
A Thomson
K Faulkner
675,000
331,016
162,900
361,474
152,100
6,741
2,015
463
372,496
130,833
-
2,015
144,939
60
-
D Stokes
290,010
5,332
118,129
25,000
Sub-total
1,972,500
16,626
766,397
107,566
Totals
2,809,148
16,626
766,397
182,865
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,211
179,586
217
-
244
-
245
30,586
-
33,883
-
33,537
1,917
277,592
1,917
277,592
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
44
31
-
32
-
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
195,999
88,666
111,433
96,134
88,666
115,233
107,833
107,983
911,947
1,260,034
512,539
178,024
567,588
152,160
472,253
3,142,598
4,054,545
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
35
Directors’ report
options granted as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2013
There is currently a Directors, Officers, Employees and Other Permitted Persons option plan. Options issued pursuant to this plan do
not have performance conditions but do contain a vesting condition requiring the employee to remain employed by the Group until a
certain date. The cost of these options is measured by reference to their fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value
is determined by using a binomial model.
There were no options granted to Directors and executives during the year ended 30 June 2013 and there are no options outstanding
at 30 June 2013.
performance rights granted as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2013
J Beyer
P Kerr
A Thomson
D Stokes
Grant
date
01-Jul-12
19-Sep-12
19-Sep-12
01-Jul-12
Number
granted
243,450
121,340
134,420
109,560
Value of performance
rights granted
during the year
$
% of
remuneration
223,974
109,206
120,978
100,795
18
21
21
21
The estimated maximum and minimum possible total value of these performance rights is $554,953 and $nil respectively.
Performance rights granted above as part of remuneration are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology which considers the
incorporation of the market-based hurdles. The value per performance right at grant date is calculated using the following assumptions:
Accounting grant date
Share price
Risk free interest rate
Volatility factor
01-Jul-12
$0.92
2.35%pa
51%
19-Sep-12
$0.90
2.55%pa
51%
The vesting of these performance rights is subject to a relative TSR hurdle to be measured on 30 June 2015 and re measured on
31 December 2015. As noted earlier, the Board is undertaking a review of the performance rights hurdles.
Mount Gibson’s TSR performance is ranked relative to a comparator group consisting of resource companies listed on ASX.
The comparator group comprises companies in the ASX Metals and Mining index with market capitalisations above certain sizes.
The vesting scale is as follows:
Percentile rank achieved
Proportion of target award vesting
>76th percentile
100%
> 51st percentile and ≤76th percentile
Pro rata allocation
51st percentile
<51st percentile
performance rights vested
50%
0%
The following performance rights vested to the following Directors and executives:
Year ended 30 June 2013
Year ended 30 June 2012
A Rule
D Berg
Total
-
-
-
211,778
83,128
294,906
There were no performance rights vested during the financial year.
36
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Directors’ report
performance rights benefits
For each grant of performance rights, the percentage of the available grant that was paid, or that vested, in the financial year, and the
percentage that was forfeited because the person did not meet the service and performance criteria is set out below. The performance
rights vest after three years, providing the vesting conditions are met (refer above).
J Beyer
J Beyer
P Kerr
A Thomson
D Stokes
Year
granted
Vested
%
Forfeited
%
Financial years
performance
rights may vest
2012
2013
2013
2013
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
shares issued on exercise of options for the year ended 30 June 2013
There were no shares issued on exercise of options by the Directors and executives during the year ended 30 June 2013 (2012: nil).
remuneration of Key Management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2012
Short term
Post employment
Long term
Non
monetary
Cash
bonuses
Super-
annuation
Retirement
benefits
Long service
leave
Share-based
payment
Termination
payment
Options and
performance
rights
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
$
%
Performance
related
Salary
& fees
$
177,275
104,129
90,844
87,156
30,868
62,572
33,467
56,915
65,512
39,857
59,156
364,582
Directors
G Hill
A Jones
Chen Z
Lee SH
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
C Readhead
I Macliver
Cao Z
L Tonkin
Sub-total
1,172,333
Other KMP
A Rule
J Beyer
D Berg
D Stokes
580,482
686,651
221,248
73,347
K Faulkner
140,400
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,151
1,151
2,303
1,343
1,919
576
480
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
292,340
100,000
140,331
-
-
15,955
9,372
6,681
7,844
2,778
5,632
3,012
5,122
-
3,587
4,178
25,000
89,161
25,000
25,000
25,000
6,192
-
Sub-total
1,702,128
6,621
532,671
81,192
Totals
2,874,461
7,772
532,671
170,353
[1] Reversal of performance rights on termination
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
193,230
113,501
97,525
95,000
33,646
68,204
36,479
62,037
65,512
43,444
63,334
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(305,237)[1]
745,370
830,866
(37)
(305,237)
745,370
1,702,778
137,641
13,816
37,792
-
-
-
-
1,037,766
827,066
27,653
453,943
-
-
80,115
140,880
41
14
39
-
-
256
189,249
27,653
2,539,770
256
(115,988)
773,023
4,242,548
Accrued annual leave and long service leave benefits were paid on termination to Mr Tonkin of $198,284, to Mr Rule of $326,651, and
to Mr Berg of $37,016. These amounts are not included in the table above.
options granted as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2012
There were no options granted to Directors and executives during the year ended 30 June 2012 and there are no options outstanding
at 30 June 2012.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
37
Directors’ report
performance rights granted as part of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2012
Grant
date
30-Jun-12
Number
granted
271,318
Value of performance
rights granted
during the year
$
276,907
% of
remuneration
14
J Beyer
The estimated maximum and minimum possible total value of these performance rights is $276,907 and $nil respectively.
Performance rights granted above as part of remuneration are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology which considers the
incorporation of the market-based hurdles. The value per performance right at grant date is calculated using the following assumptions:
Accounting grant date
Share price at accounting grant date
Risk free interest rate
Volatility factor
30-Jun-12
$1.03
2.67%pa
51%
The vesting of these performance rights is subject to a relative TSR hurdle to be measured on 30 June 2014 and re-measured on
31 December 2014. As noted earlier, the Board is undertaking a review of the performance rights hurdles.
Mount Gibson’s TSR performance is ranked relative to a comparator group consisting of resource companies listed on ASX.
The comparator group comprises companies in the ASX Metals and Mining index with market capitalisations above certain sizes.
The vesting scale is as follows:
Percentile rank achieved
Proportion of target award vesting
>76th percentile
100%
> 51st percentile and ≤76th percentile
Pro rata allocation
51st percentile
<51st percentile
company performance
50%
0%
The table below shows the performance of the Group over the last five years:
Year ended
Net profit after tax
Earnings per share
Closing share price
30 June 2013
Restated*
30 June 2012
30 June 2011
30 June 2010
30 June 2009
$’000
$/share
$
157,342
0.1445
0.47
162,016
0.1496
0.86
239,500
132,395
0.2214
1.84
0.1230
1.55
42,618
0.0456
0.90
* Restated to reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as detailed in Note 1(e) of the 2012/13 financial statements. Amounts in prior years
are not restated.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
G HILL
Chairman
Perth, 22 August 2013
38
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
AUDitor’s iNDepeNDeNce DecLArAtioN
to the Directors of Mount Gibson Iron Limited
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
39
coNsoLiDAteD iNcoMe stAteMeNt
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Continuing operations
Sale of goods
Other revenue
Total revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Administration expenses
Exploration expenses
Profit from continuing operations before tax and finance costs
Finance costs
Profit from continuing operations before tax
Tax benefit/(expense)
Net profit after tax attributable to members of the Company
Earnings per share (cents per share)
• basic earnings per share
• diluted earnings per share
Notes
2[a]
2[a]
2[d]
2[b]
2[e]
2[c]
3
22
22
2013
$’000
852,873
11,951
864,824
(698,291)
166,533
162
(30,798)
(144)
135,753
(7,313)
128,440
28,902
157,342
Restated[1]
2012
$’000
648,464
20,425
668,889
(413,526)
255,363
163
(23,554)
(53)
231,919
(7,298)
224,621
(62,605)
162,016
14.45
14.45
14.96
14.95
[1] Certain numbers shown here do not correspond to the 30 June 2012 financial statements and reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as
detailed in note 1(e).
40
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
coNsoLiDAteD stAteMeNt oF coMpreHeNsiVe iNcoMe
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Net profit for the period after tax
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges
Reclassification adjustments for losses on cash flow hedges included in the
Income Statement
Deferred income tax on cash flow hedges
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
2013
$’000
Restated[1]
2012
$’000
157,342
162,016
(18,860)
9,062
2,790
(7,008)
(11,170)
11,453
61
344
Total comprehensive income for the year
150,334
162,360
[1] Certain numbers shown here do not correspond to the 30 June 2012 financial statements and reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as
detailed in note 1(e).
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
41
coNsoLiDAteD BALANce sHeet
as at 30 June 2013
Notes
2013
$’000
Restated[1]
2012
$’000
Restated[1]
1 July
$’000
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Term deposits
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Prepayments
Derivative financial assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred acquisition, exploration and evaluation
Mine properties
Deferred tax assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LiABiLities
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Derivative financial liabilities
Income tax payable
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Provisions
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
eQUitY
Issued capital
Retained earnings
Reserves
Total equity
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
3
13
14
15
16
16
14
3
62,018
314,000
47,301
151,973
2,732
-
40,678
252,000
23,792
209,966
3,186
5,584
117,007
270,000
22,249
160,358
3,210
386
578,024
535,206
573,210
247,924
861
661,213
67,350
977,348
283,381
344
673,059
2,889
959,673
246,695
309
457,409
-
704,413
1,555,372
1,494,879
1,277,623
105,736
19,188
4,607
26,010
12,384
167,925
78,637
9,204
117,557
205,398
373,323
122,530
21,702
393
9,440
10,603
164,668
78,098
25,322
155,453
258,873
423,541
1,182,049
1,071,338
17[a]
19
18
568,328
600,978
12,743
564,710
487,162
19,466
1,182,049
1,071,338
99,556
28,607
63
22,793
4,348
155,367
24,228
16,461
110,641
151,330
306,697
970,926
561,585
390,103
19,238
970,926
[1] Certain numbers shown here do not correspond to the 30 June 2012 financial statements and reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as
detailed in note 1(e).
42
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
coNsoLiDAteD cAsH FLoW stAteMeNt
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Notes
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest paid
Income tax paid
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
4[b]
cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Payment (for)/from term deposits
Payment for deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure
Payment for mine properties
Net cash flows (used in) investing activities
cash flows from financing activities
Repayment of lease liabilities
Proceeds from borrowings
Repayment of borrowings
Payment of borrowing costs
Dividends paid
Net cash flows (used in) financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Net foreign exchange difference
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
4[a]
830,510
(593,288)
(3,478)
(54,092)
179,652
13,028
15
(42,421)
(62,000)
(216)
(2,511)
(94,105)
(21,275)
5,527
(5,914)
(1,806)
(40,004)
(63,472)
22,075
(735)
40,678
62,018
639,176
(548,883)
(53)
(34,071)
56,169
19,765
1,273
(86,191)
18,000
(35)
(6,359)
(53,547)
(18,290)
7,005
(5,497)
(1,075)
(61,935)
(79,792)
(77,170)
841
117,007
40,678
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
43
coNsoLiDAteD stAteMeNt oF cHANGes iN eQUitY
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
(Accumulated
losses)/
retained
earnings
$’000
Share-based
payments
reserve
$’000
Issued
capital
$’000
Net
unrealised
gains/
(losses)
reserve
$’000
Total
equity
Other
reserves
$’000
$’000
At 1 July 2011 – as previously reported
561,585
585,718
18,991
3,439
(3,192)
1,166,541
Change in accounting policy (note 1(e))
-
(195,615)
-
-
-
(195,615)
18,991
3,439
(3,192)
970,926
At 1 July 2011 restated[1]
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners
- Deferred income tax on capital raising cost
- Shares issued
- Dividends paid
- Share-based payment
At 30 June 2012 restated[1]
At 1 July 2012 restated
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners
- Deferred income tax on capital raising cost
- Shares issued
- Dividends paid
- Share-based payment
At 30 June 2013
561,585
-
-
-
(94)
3,219
-
-
564,710
-
-
-
95
3,523
-
-
390,103
162,016
-
162,016
-
-
(64,957)
487,162
157,342
-
157,342
-
-
(43,526)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
344
344
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
162,016
344
162,360
(94)
3,219
(64,957)
(116)
-
(7,008)
(7,008)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
157,342
(7,008)
150,334
95
3,523
(43,526)
285
-
(116)
564,710
487,162
18,875
3,783
(3,192)
1,071,338
18,875
3,783
(3,192)
1,071,338
-
285
568,328
600,978
19,160
(3,225)
(3,192)
1,182,049
[1] Certain numbers shown here do not correspond to the 30 June 2012 financial statements and reflect adjustments made on the adoption of new accounting requirements, as
detailed in note 1(e).
44
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies
(a) Corporate information
The consolidated financial statements of the Group, comprising the Company and the entities that it controlled during the year
ended 30 June 2013, was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 22 August 2013.
The Company is a company limited by shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian
Securities Exchange.
The nature of operations and principal activities of the Group are the mining of hematite iron ore deposits at Tallering Peak, Koolan
Island and Extension Hill and exploration and development of hematite deposits in the Mid West region of Western Australia.
The address of the registered office is Level 1, 2 Kings Park Road, West Perth, Western Australia, 6005, Australia.
(b) Basis of preparation
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
Corporations Act 2001, applicable Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian
Accounting Standards Board. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial
instruments that have been measured at fair value.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($’000) unless
otherwise stated under the option available to the Company under Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) Class
Order 98/0100. The Company is an entity to which the class order applies.
For the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is a for-profit entity.
(c) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its controlled entities.
The financial statements of controlled entities are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company, using consistent
accounting policies.
Adjustments are made to bring into line any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist.
All intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealised profits arising from intra-group transactions, have been
eliminated in full. Unrealised losses are eliminated unless costs cannot be recovered.
Controlled entities are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from
the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
Where there is loss of control of a controlled entity, the consolidated financial statements include the results for the part of the
reporting period during which the Company has control.
(d) Compliance with IFRS
The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
(e) New accounting standards and interpretations
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year, except for the change arising due to
the early adoption of AASB Interpretation 20 “Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine” (“Interpretation 20”).
Interpretation 20 clarifies when an entity should recognise production phase waste removal (stripping) costs (production stripping
costs) incurred in relation to a surface mining operation as an asset. Such an asset will be referred to as a stripping activity asset.
The interpretation has been adopted for the annual reporting period beginning on 1 July 2011 and has impacted the way in which
the Group accounts for production stripping costs.
Prior to the issuance of Interpretation 20, the Group deferred all costs attributable to waste stripping and concurrently recognised
as an expense the amortisation of capitalised waste stripping costs over the remaining ore reserves of the relevant mine. The
amortisation rate was calculated based on the historical and estimated future waste mining costs.
The accounting treatment in accordance with Interpretation 20 differs from the Group’s previous policy in that not all waste
development costs are initially capitalised, and the capitalisation and amortisation of waste stripping costs is undertaken at the level
of individual deposits or components thereof rather than on a whole-of-mine basis. In addition, specific transitional rules are provided
to deal with any opening deferred stripping balances an entity may have recognised under its previous accounting policy.
In order to reflect the new requirements of Interpretation 20, the Group has adopted the following accounting policy:
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
45
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(e) New accounting standards and interpretations (continued)
Deferred stripping (waste removal) costs
As part of its mining operations, the Group incurs mining stripping (waste removal) costs both during the development and
production phases of its operations.
When stripping costs are incurred in the development phase of a mine before the production phase commences (development
stripping), such expenditure is capitalised as part of the cost of constructing the mine and subsequently amortised over its
useful life using a units of production method, in accordance with the policy applicable to mine properties. The capitalisation of
development stripping costs ceases when the mine/component is commissioned and ready for use as intended by management.
Stripping activities undertaken during the production phase of a surface mine (production stripping) are accounted for as set out below.
After the commencement of production, further development of the mine may require a phase of unusually high stripping that
is similar in nature to initial development phase stripping. The costs of such stripping are accounted for in the same way as
development stripping, as outlined above.
Waste development costs incurred in the production phase create two benefits, being either the production of inventory or
improved access to the ore to be mined in the future. Where the benefits are realised in the form of inventory produced in the
period, the production stripping costs are accounted for as part of the cost of producing those inventories. Where production
stripping costs are incurred and the benefit is improved access to ore to be mined in the future, the costs are recognised as a
non-current asset, referred to as a stripping activity asset if the following criteria are met:
a)
b)
c)
Future economic benefits (being improved access to the ore body) are probable;
The component of the orebody for which access will be improved can be accurately identified; and
The costs associated with the improved access can be reliably measured.
If not all of the criteria are met, the production stripping costs are charged to the Income Statement as operating costs as they
are incurred.
In identifying components of the orebody, the Group works closely with its mining operations personnel to analyse its various mine
plans. Mines may be divided into more than one ore component with deposits potentially comprising geographically separated
components or major pushbacks forming part of a larger investment decision.
The stripping activity asset is initially measured at cost, which is the accumulation of costs directly incurred to perform the
stripping activity that improves access to the identified component of ore, plus an allocation of directly attributable overhead
costs. If incidental operations are occurring at the same time as the production stripping activity, but are not necessary for the
production stripping activity to continue as planned, these costs are not included in the cost of the stripping activity asset.
If the costs of the inventory produced and the stripping asset are not separately identifiable, the allocation is undertaken based
on the waste-to-ore stripping ratio for the particular ore component concerned. If mining of waste in a period occurs in excess of
the expected life-of-component average waste-to-ore strip ratio, the excess is recognised as part of the stripping asset. Where
mining occurs at or below the expected life-of-component stripping ratio in a period, the entire production stripping cost is
allocated to the cost of the ore inventory produced.
The stripping activity asset is accounted for as an addition to “mine properties” in the statement of financial position. This
forms part of the total investment in the relevant cash generating units, which are reviewed for impairment if events or changes
of circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The stripping activity asset is carried at cost less
amortisation and any impairment losses.
The stripping activity asset is subsequently amortised using the units of production method over the life of the identified component
of the orebody that became more accessible as a result of the stripping activity.
A regular review is undertaken of each ore component to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs
in relation to that component. Should the carrying value of the expenditure not yet amortised exceed its estimated recoverable
amount in any year, the excess is written off to the Income Statement.
Transition
Interpretation 20 is to be applied prospectively to production stripping costs incurred on or after the beginning of the earliest
period presented, which for the Group is 1 July 2011. Any previously recognised asset balance(s) that resulted from stripping
activity undertaken during the production phase “predecessor stripping asset” is reclassified as a part of an existing asset
to which the stripping activity related, to the extent that there remains an identifiable component of the orebody with which the
predecessor stripping asset can be associated. Such balances are then amortised over the remaining expected useful life of the
identified component of the orebody to which each predecessor stripping asset balance relates.
If there is no identifiable component of the orebody to which the predecessor asset relates, it has been written off through opening
retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented, being 1 July 2011.
Impact as at transition date and on the comparative financial information
In accordance with the transitional provisions of Interpretation 20, this new policy has been applied prospectively from the start of
the comparative period, being 1 July 2011. As a result of the adoption of Interpretation 20, the adjustments outlined below were
made to the financial statements.
The Group has three mining operations, Tallering Peak, Koolan Island and Extension Hill, all of which are in the production phase.
The Group had previously accounted for production stripping costs using a life-of-mine approach as explained above. As at
1 July 2011, the Group’s total deferred stripping balance was $427,650,000, of which $116,499,000 related to Tallering Peak,
$300,270,000 related to Koolan Island and $10,881,000 related to Extension Hill.
In applying the requirements of Interpretation 20, the Group has determined that, at the date of transition (i.e. 1 July 2011), Tallering
Peak had three ore components, Koolan Island had five ore components and Extension Hill had one ore component.
46
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Given the nature of the Group’s mining operations and the way the Group plans to mine the remaining components of the
orebodies, it has been determined that $279,451,000 of the predecessor stripping asset relates to components of the orebodies
where the associated ore has already been extracted.
Accordingly, an amount of $279,451,000 ($195,616,000 net of tax) has been derecognised via opening retained earnings at the
date of transition, 1 July 2011 (see adjustments below). Based on reasonable assumptions and guidance from technical personnel,
the balance of the predecessor stripping asset amounting to $148,199,000 has been allocated to identified components and will
be amortised over the remaining useful lives of these components using a units of production method.
The Group has determined that it is not practicable to quantify the impact for the 2013 financial year under the pre-Interpretation
20 approach.
The adoption of Interpretation 20 had the following impact at the transition date of 1 July 2011 and for the year ended 30 June 2012:
30 June 2012 – closing balance
581,204
(279,450)
Description
Retained earnings
1 July 2011 – opening balance
Derecognise opening deferred stripping balance
Tax effect at 30%
585,718
-
-
1 July 2011 – adjusted opening retained earnings
585,718
Mine properties
Stripping activity asset
1 July 2011 – opening balance
Derecognise opening deferred stripping balance
Sub total
Additions under previous approach
Deferred stripping recognised in profit or loss
Production stripping costs capitalised under
Interpretation 20
Stripping activity asset depreciated during the period
427,650
-
427,650
384,326
(230,772)
-
-
Other
1 July 2011 – opening balance
Net movement
30 June 2012 – closing balance
Total mine properties at
30 June 2012 – closing balance
Inventory
30 June 2012 – closing balance
Net adjustment to stripping costs allocated directly
to inventory
30 June 2012 – closing balance
227,694
-
227,694
Profit or Loss
Profit after tax for the year ended 30 June 2012
172,496
Decrease in profit due to adjustment to stripping
costs allocated directly to inventory
Increase in profit due to adjustments to production
stripping costs capitalised and stripping activity
asset depreciated during the period
Sub total
Tax effect of adjustments at 30%
-
-
172,496
-
Profit after tax for the year ended 30 June 2012
172,496
Impact on earnings per share
Previously
reported
$’000
Transition
adjustments
$’000
Adjustment due
to adoption of
Interpretation 20
$’000
Adjusted
balance
$’000
-
(279,450)
83,835
(195,615)
-
(279,450)
(279,450)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(384,326)
230,772
209,578
(53,268)
2,756
-
-
-
585,718
(279,450)
83,835
390,103
427,650
(279,450)
148,200
-
-
209,578
(53,268)
304,510
309,209
59,340
368,549
309,209
59,340
368,549
-
-
-
949,753
(279,450)
2,756
673,059
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(17,728)
227,694
(17,728)
(17,728)
209,966
-
(17,728)
172,496
(17,728)
2,756
2,756
(14,972)
4,492
(10,480)
157,524
4,492
162,016
The effect on basic earnings per share related to the 30 June 2012 restatement was a decrease of 0.97 cents per share.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
47
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(e) New accounting standards and interpretations (continued)
From 1 July 2012 the Group has adopted all new and amended accounting standards mandatory for annual periods beginning
on or after 1 July 2012 including:
Reference
Title
AASB
2010-8
Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets [AASB 112]
These amendments address the determination of deferred tax on investment property
measured at fair value and introduce a rebuttable presumption that deferred tax on
investment property measured at fair value should be determined on the basis that the
carrying amount will be recoverable through sale. The amendments also incorporate
SIC-21 Income Taxes – Recovery of Revalued Non-Depreciable Assets into AASB 112.
Application
date of
standard
1 January
2012
Application
date for
Group
1 July
2012
AASB
2011-9
Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
Presentation of Other Comprehensive Income
1 July
2012
1 July
2012
[AASB 1, 5, 7, 101, 112, 120, 121, 132, 133, 134, 1039 & 1049]
This standard requires entities to group items presented in other comprehensive income
on the basis of whether they might be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and
those that will not.
The adoptions of the above Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have an impact on the financial position or performance
of the Group.
Other Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended, are not yet effective and
have not been adopted by the Group for the period ended 30 June 2013 are outlined in the table below:
Application
date of
standard
Application
date for
Group
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
Reference
Title
Summary
AASB 10 Consolidated
Financial
Statements
AASB 10 establishes a new control model that applies to
all entities. It replaces parts of AASB 127 Consolidated and
Separate Financial Statements dealing with the accounting for
consolidated financial statements and UIG-112 Consolidation –
Special Purpose Entities.
The new control model broadens the situations when an entity
is considered to be controlled by another entity and includes
new guidance for applying the model to specific situations,
including when acting as a manager may give control, the impact
of potential voting rights and when holding less than a majority
voting rights may give control.
Consequential amendments were also made to this and other
standards via AASB 2011-7 and AASB 2012-10.
AASB 11
Joint Arrangements
AASB 11 replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and
UIG-113 Jointly-controlled Entities – Non-monetary Contributions
by Ventures.
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
AASB 11 uses the principle of control in AASB 10 to define joint
control and therefore the determination of whether joint control
exists may change. In addition it removes the option to account for
jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation.
Instead, accounting for a joint arrangement is dependent on the
nature of the rights and obligations arising from the arrangement.
Joint operations that give the venturers a right to the underlying
assets and obligations themselves is accounted for by recognising
the share of those assets and obligations. Joint ventures that give
the venturers a right to the net assets is accounted for using the
equity method.
Consequential amendments were also made to this and other
standards via AASB 2011-7, AASB 2010-10 and amendments to
AASB 128.
48
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Reference
Title
Summary
AASB 12 Disclosure of
Interests in Other
Entities
AASB 13
Fair Value
Measurement
AASB 119 Employee Benefits
AASB
2012-2
AASB
2012-5
AASB
2012-9
AASB
2011-4
Amendments
to Australian
Accounting
Standards –
Disclosures –
Offsetting Financial
Assets and
Financial Liabilities
Amendments
to Australian
Accounting
Standards arising
from Annual
Improvements
2009-2011 Cycle
Amendment to
AASB 1048 arising
from the withdrawal
of Australian
Interpretation 1039
Amendments
to Australian
Accounting
Standards to
Remove Individual
Key Management
Personnel
Disclosure
Requirements
[AASB 124]
AASB 12 includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interests
in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structured
entities. New disclosures have been introduced about the
judgements made by management to determine whether
control exists, and to require summarised information about joint
arrangements, associates, structured entities and subsidiaries
with non-controlling interests.
AASB 13 establishes a single source of guidance for determining
the fair value of assets and liabilities. AASB 13 does not change
when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather, provides
guidance on how to determine fair value when fair value is
required or permitted. Application of this definition may result in
different fair values being determined for the relevant assets.
AASB 13 also expands the disclosure requirements for all assets
or liabilities carried at fair value. This includes information about
the assumptions made and the qualitative impact of those
assumptions on the fair value determined.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards
via AASB 2011-8.
The revised standard changes the definition of short-term
employee benefits. The distinction between short-term and
other long-term employee benefits is now based on whether the
benefits are expected to be settled wholly within 12 months after
the reporting date.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards
via AASB 2011-10.
AASB 2012-2 principally amends AASB 7 Financial Instruments:
Disclosures to require disclosure of the effect or potential
effect of netting arrangements. This includes rights of set-off
associated with the entity’s recognised financial assets and
liabilities on the entity’s financial position, when offsetting criteria
of AASB 132 are not all met.
Application
date of
standard
Application
date for
Group
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
AASB 2012-5 makes amendments resulting from the 2009-2011
Annual Improvements Cycle. The standard addresses a range of
improvements, including the following:
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
•
•
Repeat application of AASB 1 is permitted (AASB 1)
Clarification of the comparative information requirements
when an entity provides a third Balance Sheet (AASB 101
Presentation of Financial Statements).
AASB 2012-9 amends AASB 1048 Interpretation of Standards
to evidence the withdrawal of Australian Interpretation 1039
Substantive Enactment of Major Tax Bills in Australia.
1 January
2013
1 July
2013
This amendment deletes from AASB 124 individual Key
Management Personnel disclosure requirements for disclosing
entities that are not companies. It also removes the individual
KMP disclosure requirements for all disclosing entities in relation
to equity holdings, loans and other related party transactions.
1 July
2013
1 July
2013
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
49
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(e) New accounting standards and interpretations (continued)
Reference
Title
Summary
Application
date of
standard
Application
date for
Group
1 January
2014
1 July
2014
AASB 2012-3 adds application guidance to AASB 132 Financial
Instruments: Presentation to address inconsistencies identified
in applying some of the offsetting criteria of AASB 132, including
clarifying the meaning of “currently has a legally enforceable
right of set-off” and that some gross settlement systems may be
considered equivalent to net settlement.
This standard establishes a differential financial reporting
framework consisting of two tiers of reporting requirements for
preparing general purpose financial statements:
1 July
2013
1 July
2013
(a)
(b)
Tier 1: Australian Accounting Standards
Tier 2: Australian Accounting Standards – Reduced
Disclosure Requirements
Tier 2 comprises the recognition, measurement and presentation
requirements of Tier 1 and substantially reduced disclosures
corresponding to those requirements.
The following entities apply Tier 1 requirements in preparing
general purpose financial statements:
(a)
(b)
For-profit entities in the private sector that have public
accountability (as defined in this standard)
The Australian Government and State, Territory and local
governments
The following entities apply either Tier 2 or Tier 1 requirements in
preparing general purpose financial statements:
(a)
For-profit private sector entities that do not have public
accountability
(b) All not-for-profit private sector entities
(c) Public sector entities other than the Australian Government
and State, Territory and local governments.
Consequential amendments to other standards to implement the
regime were introduced by AASB 2010-2, 2011-6, 2011-11, 2012-
1, 2012-7 and 2012-11.
AASB 9 includes requirements for the classification and
measurement of financial assets. It was further amended by
AASB 2010-7 to reflect amendments to the accounting for
financial liabilities.
These requirements improve and simplify the approach for
classification and measurement of financial assets compared
with the requirements of AASB 139. The main changes are
described below.
(a)
Financial assets that are debt instruments will be classified
based on
(1)
the objective of the entity’s business model for
managing the financial assets;
(2)
the characteristics of the contractual cash flows.
(b) Allows an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present
gains and losses on investments in equity instruments that
are not held for trading on other comprehensive income.
Dividends in respect of these investments that are a return
on investment can be recognised in profit or loss and there
is no impairment or recycling on disposal of the instrument.
1 January
2015
1 July
2015
AASB
2012-3
Amendments
to Australian
Accounting
Standards –
Offsetting Financial
Assets and
Financial Liabilities
AASB
1053
Application of
Tiers Australian
Accounting
Standards
AASB 9
Financial
Instruments
50
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Reference
Title
Summary
AASB 9
Financial
Instruments
(c)
Financial assets can be designated and measured at fair
value through profit or loss at initial recognition if doing
so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or
recognition inconsistency that would arise from measuring
assets or liabilities, or recognising the gains and losses on
them, on different bases.
Application
date of
standard
Application
date for
Group
1 January
2015
1 July
2015
(d) Where the fair value option is used for financial liabilities the
change in fair value is to be accounted for as follows:
•
•
The change attributable to changes in credit risk are
presented in other comprehensive income (OCI)
The remaining change is presented in profit or loss
If this approach creates or enlarges an accounting mismatch in
the profit or loss, the effect of the changes in credit risk are also
presented in profit or loss.
Further amendments were made by AASB 2012-6 which
amends the mandatory effective date to annual reporting periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2015. AASB 2012-6 also modifies
the relief from restating prior periods by amending AASB 7 to
require additional disclosures on transition to AASB 9 in some
circumstances.
Consequential amendments were also made to other standards
as a result of AASB 9, introduced by AASB 2009-11 and
superseded by AASB 2010-7 and 2010-10.
AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements – based on investments held by the Group at 30 June 2013, this Standard is not
expected to have a significant impact on the entities that are currently consolidated in the year of initial application.
AASB 11 Joint Arrangements - the Group does not have any joint arrangements therefore this Standard is not expected to have
any impact on the Group’s financial results in the initial year of application.
AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities – based on investments held by the Group at 30 June 2013, this Standard will
have no impact on the Group’s financial results and Balance Sheet in the initial year of application.
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement – this Standard establishes a single source of guidance for determining the fair value of assets
and liabilities. Based on the fair value measurements of the Group’s assets and liabilities at 30 June 2013, this Standard is not
expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s financial results in the initial year of application.
Except as disclosed above, the Group has yet to fully assess the impact of the other Accounting Standards and Amendments to
Accounting Standards will have on the financial statements, when applied in future financial periods.
(f)
Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company and its controlled entities is Australian dollars (A$).
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency at the exchange rates ruling at the date of the
transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at
the Balance Sheet date. All such exchange differences are taken to the Income Statement in the consolidated financial report.
(g) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits in the Balance Sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short-term deposits with an original
maturity of three months or less.
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above,
net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(h) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are recognised and carried at amortised cost less any allowance for impairment.
Collectability of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis at an operating unit level. Individual debts that are known to
be uncollectible are written off when identified. An allowance for impairment of trade receivables is made when there is objective
evidence that the Group will not be able to collect the debts. Indicators of impairment would include financial difficulties of the
debtor, likelihood of the debtor’s insolvency and default in payment. Any impairment is recognised in the Income Statement.
The vast majority of sales revenue is invoiced and received in US dollars (US$). The balance is invoiced and received in A$.
Generally, on presentation of shiploading documents and provisional invoice, the customer settles 90-95% of the provisional sales
invoice value within 10 days of receipt of shiploading documents and provisional invoice, and the remaining 5-10% is settled within
30 days of presentation of the final invoice. The final value is subject to minor adjustments based on the final analyses of weight,
chemical and physical composition, and moisture content.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
51
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(i)
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Cost comprises direct material, labour and expenditure in getting such inventories to their existing location and condition, based
on weighted average costs incurred during the period in which such inventories were produced.
Consumable materials for plant and equipment are recognised as inventory. Consumable stocks are carried at the lower of cost
and net realisable value.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the
estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
(j) Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment in value.
Depreciation
The cost of owned property, plant and equipment directly engaged in mining operations is written off over its expected economic
life on a units-of-production method, in the establishment of which, due regard is given to the life of the related area of interest.
Plant and equipment under hire purchase or finance lease directly engaged in mining operations is written down to its residual
value over the lesser of the hire purchase or finance lease term or useful life. Other assets which are depreciated or amortised on
a basis other than the units-of-production method typically are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life
of the asset as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
Buildings
Motor vehicles
Office equipment
Leasehold improvements
Koolan Island mining fleet on hire purchase
5 - 20 years
4 - 5 years
3 - 5 years
Shorter of lease term or useful life of 5 - 10 years
5 years
Impairment
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-
generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If any such indication exists and where the carrying values exceed the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-
generating units are written down to their recoverable amount.
Derecognition
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to
arise from the continued use of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the
carrying amount of the item) is included in the Income Statement in the period the item is derecognised.
(k) Mine properties
Deferred stripping
As part of its mining operations, the Group incurs mining stripping (waste removal) costs both during the development and
production phase of its operations.
When stripping costs are incurred in the development phase of a mine before the production phase commences (development
stripping), such expenditure is capitalised as part of the cost of constructing the mine and subsequently amortised over its
useful life using a units of production method, in accordance with the policy applicable to mine properties. The capitalisation of
development stripping costs ceases when the mine/component is commissioned and ready for use as intended by management.
Waste development costs incurred in the production phase creates two benefits, being either the production of inventory or
improved access to the ore to be mined in the future. Where the benefits are realised in the form of inventory produced in the
period, the production stripping costs are accounted for as part of the cost of producing those inventories. Where production
stripping costs are incurred and the benefit is improved access to ore to be mined in the future, the costs are recognised as a
stripping activity asset in mine properties.
If the costs of the inventory produced and the stripping asset are not separately identifiable, the allocation is undertaken based
on waste-to-ore stripping ratio for the particular ore component concerned. If mining of waste in a period occurs in excess of
the expected life-of-component average waste-to-ore strip ratio, the excess is recognised as part of the stripping asset. Where
mining occurs at or below the expected life-of-component stripping ratio in a period, the entire production stripping cost is
allocated to the cost of the ore inventory produced.
Amortisation is provided on the units-of-production method over the life of the identified component of orebody. The units-
of-production method results in an amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the economically recoverable mineral
resources (comprising proven and probable reserves).
52
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Other mine properties
Other mine properties represent the accumulation of all acquisition, exploration, evaluation and development expenditure incurred
by or on behalf of the Group in relation to areas of interest in which mining of mineral resource has commenced. When further
development expenditure is incurred in respect of a mine property after the commencement of production, such expenditure
is carried forward as part of the cost of that mine property only when substantial future economic benefits are established,
otherwise such expenditure is classified as part of the cost of production.
Amortisation is provided on the units-of-production method over the life of the mine, with separate calculations being made for
each mineral resource. The units-of-production method results in an amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the
economically recoverable mineral resources (comprising proven and probable reserves).
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in
relation to that area of interest. Should the carrying value of the expenditure not yet amortised exceed its estimated recoverable
amount in any year, the excess is written off to the Income Statement.
(l) Acquisition, exploration and evaluation costs
Acquisition costs
Exploration and evaluation costs arising from acquisitions are carried forward where exploration and evaluation activities have not,
at balance date, reached a stage to allow a reasonable assessment regarding the existence of economically recoverable reserves.
Exploration and evaluation costs
Costs arising from exploration and evaluation activities are capitalised if activities in the area of interest have not yet reached a
stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves. To the extent
that it is determined in the future that this capitalised expenditure should be written off, this will reduce profits and net assets in
the period in which this determination is made.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in
relation to that area of interest. Where uncertainty exists as to the future viability of certain areas, the value of the area of interest
is written off to the Income Statement or provided against.
(m) Rehabilitation costs
Long-term environmental obligations are based on the Group’s environmental management plans, in compliance with current
environmental and regulatory requirements.
Full provision is made based on the net present value of the estimated cost of restoring the environmental disturbance that has
occurred up to the Balance Sheet date. Increases due to additional environmental disturbances, relating to the development of
an asset, are capitalised and amortised over the remaining lives of the area of interest.
Annual increases in the provision relating to the change in the net present value of the provision are accounted for in the Income
Statement as borrowing costs.
The estimated costs of rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology or
other circumstances. Cost estimates are not reduced by potential proceeds from the sale of assets.
(n) Recoverable amount of assets
At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of
impairment exists, the Group makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Recoverable amount is determined for an
individual asset, unless the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less cost to sell and it does not
generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case the recoverable
amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
An assessment is also made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that a previously recognised impairment
loss may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously
recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable
amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to
its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of
depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss
unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase. After such a reversal,
the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a
systematic basis over its remaining useful life.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
53
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(o) Financial assets
Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: ‘held-to-maturity’ investments, ‘loans and receivables’ and
‘available-for-sale financial assets’. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined
at the time of initial recognition.
All financial assets are recognised initially at fair value plus transaction costs, except in the case of financial assets recorded at
fair value through profit or loss.
Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and of allocating interest income
over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the
expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.
[i] Held-to-maturity investments
Commercial bills and bonds with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity dates that the Group has the positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments are recorded
at amortised cost using the effective interest method less impairment, with revenue recognised on an effective yield basis.
[ii]
Loans and receivables
Trade receivables, loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active
market are classified as ‘loans and receivables’.
Trade receivables, loans and other receivables are recorded at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method, less
any impairment. Interest is recognised by applying the effective interest rate method.
(p) Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the
Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments
in respect of the purchase of these goods and services.
(q)
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received less directly attributable transaction
costs.
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest rate method. Fees paid on the establishment of loan facilities are included as part of the carrying amount of the loans and
borrowings.
Gains and losses are recognised in the profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised.
(r) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable
that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be
made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a
pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific
to the liability.
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
A provision for dividends is not recognised as a liability unless the dividends have been declared, determined or publicly
recommended on or before the balance date.
(s) Share-based payment transactions
The Group provides benefits to employees (including Directors) of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions,
whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (“equity-settled transactions”).
Options
There is currently a Directors, Officers, Employees and Other Permitted Persons option plan.
The cost of these options is measured by reference to their fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is
determined by using a binomial model.
In valuing these options, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares
of the Company.
54
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Performance rights
There is a Mount Gibson Iron Limited Performance Rights Plan (“PRP”). The PRP enables the Company to provide its executives
with long-term incentives which create a link between the delivery of value to shareholders, financial performance and rewarding
and retaining the executives.
The cost of these performance rights is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value
is determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which
the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award
(“vesting date”).
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent
to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the number of awards that, in the opinion of the Directors of the Group, will
ultimately vest. This opinion is formed based on the best available information at balance date. No adjustment is made for the
likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair
value at grant date.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market
condition.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been
modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any increase in the value of the transaction as a result of the modification, as
measured at the date of modification.
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not
yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and
designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a
modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share.
(t) Employee benefits
Wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits and annual leave due to be settled within 12 months of the
reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date. They are measured at
the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken
and are measured at the rates paid or payable.
Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of future
payments due to be settled in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. Consideration is given to
future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures, and periods of service. Future payments are discounted using
market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currencies that match, as closely as
possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
Superannuation
Contributions made by the Group to employee superannuation funds, which are defined contribution plans, are charged as an
expense when incurred.
(u) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred except when borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the
acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset.
(v) Leases
The determination of whether an arrangement is or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement and requires
an assessment of whether the fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets and the
arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.
Leases are classified at their inception as either operating or finance leases based on the economic substance of the agreement
so as to reflect the risks and benefits incidental to ownership.
Operating leases
The minimum lease payments of operating leases, where the lessor effectively retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of
ownership of the leased item, are recognised as an expense in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Contingent rentals are recognised as an expense in the financial year in which they are incurred.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
55
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(v) Leases (continued)
Finance leases
Leases which effectively transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item to the Group
are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum
lease payments.
Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate
of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly to the Income Statement.
Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset or where appropriate, over the estimated life
of the mine.
The cost of improvements to or on leasehold property is capitalised, disclosed as leasehold improvements, and amortised over
the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is the shorter.
(w) Revenue
Revenue is recognised and measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable to the extent that it is probable that
the economic benefits will flow to the entity and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria
must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Sale of goods
Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and can be
measured reliably.
Interest
Revenue is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest method. This is a method of calculating the amortised cost
of a financial asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period using the effective interest rate, which is the rate
that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount
of the financial asset.
Dividends
Revenue is recognised when the shareholders’ right to receive the payment is established.
(x) Taxation
Income tax
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the Balance Sheet date between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable differences:
•
•
except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is
not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss;
and
in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint
ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the
temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and
unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary
differences, and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:
•
•
except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition
of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither
the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in controlled entities, associates and interests
in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will
reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each Balance Sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is
no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is
realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the Balance
Sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the Income Statement.
Mineral Resource Rent Tax (MRRT)
MRRT is considered, for accounting purposes, to be a tax based on income. Accordingly, current and deferred MRRT tax
expense is measured and disclosed on the same basis as income tax.
The Group has recognised deferred income tax assets in respect of the tax base of MRRT assets to the extent that the Group
estimates these deferred income tax assets will be utilised in the future.
56
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
(y) Other taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
•
•
where the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case
the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in
the Balance Sheet.
Cash flows are included in the cash flow statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing
and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
(z) Derivative financial instruments and hedging
The Group uses foreign currency contracts to hedge its risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. Such derivative
financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently
remeasured to fair value.
Any gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives, except those that qualify as cash flow hedges, are taken
directly to net profit or loss for the year.
The fair value of forward exchange contracts is calculated by reference to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar
maturity profiles.
For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as either fair value hedges when they hedge the exposure to changes
in the fair value of a recognised asset or liability; or cash flow hedges where they hedge exposure to variability in cash flows that
is either attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a forecasted transaction.
Cash flow hedges – forward foreign currency contracts
In relation to cash flow hedges (forward foreign currency contracts) to hedge firm commitments which meet the conditions
for hedge accounting, the portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is
recognised directly in equity and the ineffective portion is recognised in the Income Statement.
When the hedged firm commitment results in the recognition of an asset or a liability, then, at the time the asset or liability is
recognised, the associated gains or losses that had previously been recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement
of the acquisition cost or other carrying amount of the asset or liability.
For all other cash flow hedges, the gains or losses that are recognised in equity are transferred to the Income Statement in the
same year in which the hedged firm commitment affects the net profit and loss, for example when the future sale actually occurs.
The Group tests each of the designated cash flow hedges for effectiveness on a monthly basis both retrospectively and
prospectively using regression analysis. A minimum of 50 data points is used for regression analysis and if the testing falls within
the 80:125 range, the hedge is considered highly effective and continues to be designated as a cash flow hedge.
At each balance date, the Group measures ineffectiveness using the ratio offset method. For foreign currency cash flow hedges if
the risk is over hedged, the ineffective portion is taken immediately to other income or expense in the Income Statement.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies
for hedge accounting. At that point in time, any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is kept in
equity until the forecasted transaction occurs.
If a hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the net cumulative gain or loss recognised in equity is transferred to the
Income Statement.
(aa) Financial instruments issued by the Group
[i]
Debt and equity instruments
Debt and equity instruments are classified as either liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual
arrangement.
[ii]
Transaction costs on the issue of equity instruments
Transaction costs arising on the issue of equity instruments are recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds
of the equity instruments to which the costs relate. Transaction costs are the costs that are incurred directly in connection
with the issue of those equity instruments and which would not have been incurred had those instruments not been issued.
(bb) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs of
servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the company, adjusted for:
•
•
•
costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;
the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised
as expenses; and
other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential
ordinary shares;
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
57
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
1. sUMMArY oF siGNiFicANt AccoUNtiNG poLicies (coNtiNUeD)
(cc) Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions have been made as follows:
(i) Mine rehabilitation provision
The Group assesses its mine rehabilitation provision annually in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note
1(m). Significant judgement is required in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation as there are many transactions
and other factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable to rehabilitate the mine site. Factors that will affect this liability
include future development, changes in technology, commodity price changes and changes in interest rates. When these
factors change or become known in the future, such difference will impact the mine rehabilitation provision in the period in
which they change or become known.
(ii) Units of production method of depreciation
The Group applies the units of production method of depreciation of its mine assets based on ore tonnes mined. These
calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. Significant judgement is required in assessing the available ore
reserves and mineral resources and the production capacity of the operations to be depreciated under this method. Factors
that are considered in determining ore reserves and mineral resources and production capacity are the Group’s history
of converting mineral resources to ore reserves and the relevant time frames, the complexity of metallurgy, markets and
future developments. The Group uses economically recoverable mineral resources (comprising proven and probable ore
reserves) to depreciate assets on a unit of production basis. However, where a mineral property has been acquired and an
amount has been attributed to the fair value of mineral resources not yet designated as ore reserves, the additional mineral
resources have been taken into account. When these factors change or become known in the future, such differences will
impact pre-tax profit and carrying values of assets.
(iii) Determination of mineral resources and ore reserves
The Group estimates its mineral resources and ore reserves in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 2012 (the ‘JORC Code’). The information on mineral resources
and ore reserves was prepared by or under the supervision of Competent Persons as defined in the JORC Code. The
amounts presented are based on the mineral resources and ore reserves determined under the JORC Code.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral resources and ore reserves and assumptions that are valid
at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available.
Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery rates may change the
economic status of reserves and may, ultimately, result in the ore reserves being restated. Such changes in the ore reserves
could impact on depreciation and amortisation rates, asset carrying values, deferred stripping costs and provisions for
decommissioning and restoration.
(iv)
Impairment of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure
The future recoverability of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is dependent on a number of factors, including
whether the Group decides to exploit the related lease itself or, if not, whether it successfully recovers the related exploration
and evaluation asset through sale.
Factors which could impact the future recoverability include the level of mineral resources and ore reserves, future
technological changes which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes (including changes to environmental
restoration obligations) and changes to commodity prices.
To the extent that capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is determined not to be recoverable in the future, this
will reduce profits and net assets in the period in which this determination is made.
In addition, exploration and evaluation expenditure is capitalised if activities in the area of interest have not yet reached a
stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable ore reserves. To
the extent that it is determined in the future that this capitalised expenditure should be written off, this will reduce profits and
net assets in the period in which this determination is made.
(v)
Impairment of capitalised mine development expenditure
The future recoverability of capitalised mine development expenditure is dependent on a number of factors, including the
level of mineral resources and ore reserves, future technological changes which could impact the cost of mining, future legal
changes (including changes to environmental restoration obligations) and changes to commodity prices.
To the extent that capitalised mine development expenditure is determined not to be recoverable in the future, this will
reduce profits and net assets in the period in which this determination is made. Capitalised mine development expenditure
is assessed for recoverability along with property, plant and equipment as described below.
58
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
(vi)
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
The carrying value of property, plant and equipment is reviewed for impairment if there is any indication that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Where a review for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by
reference to the higher of ‘value in use’ (being the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant cash
generating unit) and ‘fair value less costs to sell’.
In determining value in use, future cash flow forecasts for each cash generating unit (i.e. each mine) are prepared utilising
management’s latest estimates of mine life, mineral resource and ore reserve recovery, operating and capital costs, royalties
and taxation, and other relevant cash inflows and outflows. Cash flow scenarios for a range of commodity prices and foreign
exchange rates are assessed using internal and external market forecasts, and the present value of the forecast cash flows
is determined utilising estimates of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital.
The Group’s cash flows are most sensitive to movements in iron ore prices, the discount rate and key operating costs. In
particular, the forecast cash flows of the Koolan Island operation are most sensitive to variations in these key factors while a
mine waste stripping program is completed over the next few years.
Variations to the expected future cash flows, and the timing thereof, could result in significant changes to any impairment
assessment or losses recognised, if any, which could in turn impact future financial results.
(vii) Deferred waste
The Group has adopted a policy of deferring waste development costs and amortising them in accordance with the
accounting policies set out in Notes 1(e) and 1(k). Significant judgement is required in determining the capitalisation ratio for
each mine. Factors that are considered include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Any proposed changes in the design of the mine;
Estimates of the quantities of ore reserves and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of confidence of
economic extraction;
Identifiable components of orebody;
Future production levels;
Impacts of regulatory obligations and taxation legislation;
Future commodity prices; and
Future cash costs of production.
(viii) Recoverability of potential deferred tax assets
The Group recognises deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses to the extent that the future utilisation of these losses
is considered probable. Assessing the future utilisation of these losses requires the Group to make significant estimates
related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from
operations and the application of existing tax laws. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly
from estimates, this could result in significant changes to the deferred tax assets recognised, which would in turn impact
future financial results.
(ix) Share-based payment transactions
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity
instruments at the date at which they are granted and applying an estimated probability that they will vest. The accounting
estimates and assumptions relating to share-based payments would have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact expenses and equity.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
59
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Notes
2013
$’000
2. reVeNUe AND expeNses
[a] Revenue
Sale of ore
Realised gain on foreign exchange hedges
Other revenue
Interest income
[b] Other income
Realised gain on foreign exchange
Other income
[c] Finance costs
Finance charges on banking facilities
Finance charges payable under finance leases
Interest accretion on rehabilitation provision
[d] Cost of sales
Mining costs
Mining depreciation costs
Mining waste costs deferred
Amortisation of mining waste costs deferred
Amortisation of mine properties
Preproduction expenditure
Crushing costs
Depreciation – crushing
Transport costs
Depreciation – transport
Port costs
Depreciation – port
Royalties
Net ore inventory movement
12
12
12
[e] Administration expenses include:
Depreciation
Share-based payments expense
21[a]
Net loss on disposal of plant and equipment
Net unrealised foreign exchange loss
843,811
9,062
852,873
11,951
11,951
1
161
162
2,406
2,869
5,275
2,038
7,313
319,823
28,935
(100,904)
97,544
26,806
-
34,230
7,112
104,810
7,622
27,680
26,390
64,832
53,411
698,291
514
285
38
735
Restated
2012
$’000
637,011
11,453
648,464
20,425
20,425
-
163
163
2,301
4,010
6,311
987
7,298
397,594
28,622
(209,578)
53,268
22,995
(1,208)
28,091
6,063
57,071
4,318
16,027
4,456
46,959
(41,152)
413,526
370
(116)
494
129
[f] Cost of sales and administration expenses above include:
Salaries, wages expense and other employee benefits
Operating lease rental – minimum lease payments
104,535
41,053
88,859
36,430
60
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
3. tAxAtioN
Major components of tax (benefit)/expense for the years ended 30
June 2013 and 2012 are:
Income Statement
Current tax
Current income tax charge
Deferred tax
Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences:
Income tax
Minerals resource rent tax
Tax (benefit)/expense reported in Income Statement
Statement of changes in equity
Current income tax
Current income tax charge
Deferred income tax
Capital raising costs
Remeasurement of foreign exchange contracts
Deferred income tax (benefit)/liability reported in equity
Reconciliation of tax expense
A reconciliation of tax expense applicable to accounting profit before tax
at the statutory income tax rate to tax expense at the Group’s effective
tax rate for the years ended 30 June 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
Accounting profit before tax
• At the statutory income tax rate of 30% (2012: 30%)
• Expenditure not allowed for income tax purposes
• Other
Minerals resource rent tax benefit
Tax (benefit)/expense
Effective tax rate
Tax (benefit)/expense reported in Income Statement
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
72,073
20,718
(36,514)
(64,461)
(28,902)
44,776
(2,889)
62,605
-
-
(1,382)
(1,382)
128,440
38,532
101
(3,074)
(64,461)
(28,902)
(23.0)%
(28,902)
-
94
(61)
33
224,621
67,386
(123)
(1,769)
(2,889)
62,605
28.0%
62,605
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
61
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
3. tAxAtioN (coNtiNUeD)
recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:
Consolidated
Accrued liabilities
Capital raising costs
Deferred income
Foreign exchange contracts
Interest receivable
Inventory
Lease liability
Minerals resource rent tax
Prepaid expenditure
Fixed assets, mine properties
and exploration expenditure
Provisions
Borrowing cost
Share-based payment
Tax losses
Tax (assets) liabilities
Set off of tax
Assets
Liabilities
Net
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
(2,201)
342
-
(1,602)
-
-
(885)
(1,145)
(412)
-
(15)
-
(974)
(890)
(67,350)
(2,889)
-
-
-
-
(27,437)
(26,610)
(732)
-
-
-
-
(3,401)
-
-
-
-
740
3,898
-
-
48
-
-
43,877
-
699
-
-
-
(2,201)
342
-
(1,602)
740
3,898
(885)
(1,145)
(412)
43,877
(15)
699
(974)
(890)
(67,350)
(2,889)
101
48
101
145,386
144,219
145,386
144,219
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
(27,437)
(26,610)
(732)
-
-
-
4
(3,401)
(99,865)
(36,336)
150,072
188,900
50,207
152,564
32,515
33,447
(32,515)
(33,447)
-
-
Net tax (assets)/liabilities
(67,350)
(2,889)
117,557
155,453
50,207
152,564
Movement in temporary differences during
the financial year ended 30 June 2013
Accrued liabilities
Capital raising costs
Deferred income
Foreign exchange contracts
Interest receivable
Inventory
Lease liability
Minerals resource rent tax
Prepaid expenditure
Fixed assets, mine properties and exploration
expenditure
Provisions
Borrowing cost
Share-based payment
Tax losses
Restated
balance
1 July 2012
$’000
Recognised
in income
$’000
Recognised
in equity
$’000
Balance
30 June 2013
$’000
(1,145)
(412)
43,877
(15)
699
(974)
(890)
(2,889)
101
144,219
(26,610)
-
4
(3,401)
152,564
(1,056)
754
(43,877)
(205)
41
4,872
5
(64,461)
(53)
1,167
(827)
(732)
(4)
3,401
-
-
-
(1,382)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,201)
342
-
(1,602)
740
3,898
(885)
(67,350)
48
145,386
(27,437)
(732)
-
-
(100,975)
(1,382)
50,207
62
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Restated
balance
1 July 2011
$’000
Recognised
in income
$’000
Recognised
in equity
$’000
Balance
30 June 2012
$’000
Movement in temporary differences during
the financial year ended 30 June 2012
Accrued liabilities
Capital raising costs
Deferred income
Foreign exchange contracts
Interest receivable
Inventory
Lease liability
Minerals resource rent tax
Prepaid expenditure
Fixed assets, mine properties and exploration
expenditure
Provisions
Share-based payment
Tax losses
(1,255)
(912)
44,246
2,518
1,278
3,482
(1,559)
-
27
73,590
(7,373)
-
(3,401)
110,641
110
406
(369)
(2,472)
(579)
(4,456)
669
(2,889)
74
70,629
(19,237)
4
-
-
94
-
(61)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41,890
33
2013
$’000
(1,145)
(412)
43,877
(15)
699
(974)
(890)
(2,889)
101
144,219
(26,610)
4
(3,401)
152,564
2012
$’000
Unrecognised deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of the
following items:
Minerals resource rent tax – mine properties (net of income tax)
[1]
217,784
292,659
Provision for write down of investments
Tax losses
-
558
965
44
218,342
293,668
[1] Deferred tax assets relating to minerals resource rent tax have not been recognised on the basis that it is not probable they will be utilised in the future and therefore they are
considered not to be recoverable.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
63
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
4. cAsH AND cAsH eQUiVALeNts
[a] Reconciliation of cash
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash
equivalents comprise the following at 30 June:
Cash at bank and in hand
Short-term deposits
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily
bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for varying
periods of between one day and three months depending on the
immediate cash requirements of the Group, and earn interest at
the respective short-term deposit rates.
[b] Reconciliation of the net profit after tax to the net cash
flows from operations
Net profit after tax
Adjustments for:
Depreciation of non-current assets
Amortisation of deferred waste
Amortisation of other mine properties
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Net mark-to-market differences on derivatives
Interest received
Exploration expenses written off
Share-based payments
Interest accretion on rehabilitation provision
Stock obsolescence
Borrowing costs
Unrealised loss on foreign exchange
Capitalised expenses
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase) in trade and other receivables
(Increase)/decrease in inventory
(Increase)/decrease in prepayments and deposits
(Increase) in deferred tax assets
(Increase) in capitalised deferred waste
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
Increase/(decrease) in current income tax liabilities
Increase in deferred tax liabilities
Increase in restructure provision
Increase in road sealing provision
Increase in employee benefits
Net cash flow from operating activities
[c] Non-cash financing activities
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
47,018
15,000
62,018
40,678
-
40,678
157,342
162,016
70,573
97,544
26,806
38
-
43,829
53,268
22,995
494
(4,747)
(11,951)
(20,425)
144
285
2,038
1,699
1,797
735
(2,116)
(23,509)
56,294
452
(64,461)
(100,904)
(16,794)
16,570
(35,102)
1,279
200
693
179,652
47
(116)
987
-
1,738
-
-
(1,589)
(49,608)
(24)
(2,889)
(209,578)
24,873
(13,353)
41,892
4,158
333
1,868
56,169
During the financial year, the Group acquired property, plant and equipment with an aggregate fair value of $2,531,193 (2012:
$27,714,098) by means of finance leases and hire purchase agreements. During the financial year, the Group disposed of items of
property, plant and equipment with an aggregate fair value of $nil (2012: $345,350) which were financed by means of finance leases.
64
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
5. terM Deposits
Current
Receivables – term deposits
Term deposits are made for varying periods of between three and 12
months depending on the term cash requirements of the Group, and
earn interest at market term deposit rates.
6. trADe AND otHer receiVABLes
Current
Trade debtors
Sundry debtors
Other receivables
Notes
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
314,000
314,000
252,000
252,000
[a][i]
[a][ii]
37,705
6,490
3,106
47,301
13,432
5,384
4,976
23,792
[a] Terms and conditions
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments:
[i]
[ii]
Details of terms and conditions of trade debtors and credit sales are set out in note 1(h).
Sundry debtors are non-interest bearing and have repayment terms between 30 and 90 days.
[b]
Impaired or past due financial assets
An allowance for impairment loss is recognised when there is objective evidence that an individual trade receivable is impaired.
At 30 June 2013, trade debtors of nil (2012: $ $nil) in the Group were impaired.
At 30 June 2013, trade debtors of $5,166,585 (2012: $4,585,321) in the Group were past due but not impaired. These relate
to a number of customers for whom there is no recent history of default or other indicators of impairment. At 13 August 2013
$4,170,000 of this amount remains outstanding.
With respect to trade debtors that are neither impaired nor past due, there are no indications as of the reporting date that the
relevant debtors will not meet their payment obligations.
Movements in the allowance for impairment of trade debtors were as follows:
Balance at the beginning of the year
Charge for the year
Amounts written off
Balance at the end of the year
The ageing of trade debtors past due but not impaired is as follows:
Less than 30 days overdue
Between 30 and 60 days overdue
Between 60 and 90 days overdue
Greater than 90 days overdue
Trade debtors not impaired and not past due
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
-
-
-
-
109
-
999
4,058
5,166
32,539
37,705
-
-
-
-
-
509
1,819
2,257
4,585
8,847
13,432
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
65
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
7.
iNVeNtories
Consumables – at cost
Provision for stock obsolescence
Ore – at cost
Provision for low grade ore
8. DeriVAtiVe FiNANciAL Assets
Current
Foreign currency forward contracts and options
30[b][i]
Notes
2013
$’000
28,736
(1,893)
147,443
(22,313)
151,973
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
31,620
(194)
203,657
(25,117)
209,966
2012
$’000
-
-
5,584
5,584
Percentage of equity
interest held by the group
9.
iNterest iN sUBsiDiAries
Name
Mount Gibson Mining Limited
Geraldton Bulk Handling Pty Ltd
Aztec Resources Limited
• Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd
• Koolan Shipping Pty Ltd
• Brockman Minerals Pty Ltd
Country of
incorporation
2013
%
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
100
100
100
100
100
100
2012
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
entities subject to class order relief
Pursuant to Class Order 98/1418, relief has been granted to Mount Gibson Mining Limited, Aztec Resources Limited and Koolan
Iron Ore Pty Ltd from the Corporations Act 2001 requirements for the preparation, audit and lodgement of their financial reports. As
a condition of the Class Order, Mount Gibson Iron Limited, Mount Gibson Mining Limited, Aztec Resources Limited and Koolan Iron
Ore Pty Ltd (“Closed Group”) entered into a Deed of Cross Guarantee on 1 May 2009. The effect of this deed is that Mount Gibson
Iron Limited has guaranteed to pay any deficiency in the event of winding up of these controlled entities or if they do not meet their
obligations under the terms of overdrafts, loans, leases or other liabilities subject to the guarantee. The controlled entities have also
given a similar guarantee in the event that Mount Gibson Iron Limited is wound up or if it does not meet its obligations under the terms
of overdrafts, loans, leases or other liabilities subject to the guarantee.
The Consolidated Income Statement and Balance Sheet of the Closed Group are set out below:
66
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Consolidated Income Statement of the Closed Group
Continuing operations
Sale of goods
Other revenue
Total revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Administration expenses
Exploration expenses
Profit from continuing operations before tax and finance costs
Finance costs
Profit from continuing operations before tax
Tax benefit/(expense)
Net profit after tax attributable to members of the Closed Group
2013
$’000
852,873
11,945
864,818
(653,668)
211,150
160
(30,795)
(144)
180,371
(7,366)
173,005
10,625
183,630
Restated
2012
$’000
648,464
20,412
668,876
(400,817)
268,059
163
(23,550)
(53)
244,619
(7,298)
237,321
(63,282)
174,039
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
67
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
9.
iNterest iN sUBsiDiAries (coNtiNUeD)
Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Closed Group
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
Restated
1 July 2011
$’000
59,004
314,000
43,081
151,973
2,706
-
40,028
252,000
22,869
209,962
3,155
5,584
116,082
270,000
21,365
160,358
3,183
386
570,764
533,598
571,374
121,275
195,066
861
661,213
61,201
1,039,616
100,732
216,640
344
673,059
2,889
993,664
32,561
244,280
309
457,318
-
734,468
1,610,380
1,527,262
1,305,842
99,990
19,188
4,607
26,010
12,220
162,015
78,598
9,204
110,372
198,174
360,189
117,468
21,702
393
9,440
10,454
159,457
78,063
25,322
151,228
254,613
414,070
96,492
28,607
63
22,793
4,256
152,211
24,217
16,461
112,287
152,965
305,176
1,250,191
1,113,192
1,000,666
568,328
669,120
12,743
564,710
529,016
19,466
561,585
419,843
19,238
1,250,191
1,113,192
1,000,666
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Term deposits
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Prepayments
Derivative financial assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Other receivables
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred acquisition, exploration and evaluation costs
Mine properties
Deferred tax assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LiABiLities
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Derivative financial liabilities
Income tax payable
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Provisions
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
eQUitY
Issued capital
Retained earnings
Reserves
Total equity
68
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
10. propertY, pLANt AND eQUipMeNt
Freehold land – at cost
Plant and equipment – at cost
Accumulated depreciation
Plant and equipment under lease – at cost
Accumulated depreciation
Buildings – at cost
Accumulated depreciation
Buildings under lease – at cost
Accumulated depreciation
Capital works in progress – at cost
Total property, plant and equipment
At cost
Total accumulated depreciation
[a] Assets pledged as security
The value of assets pledged as security are:
Freehold land
Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment under lease
Buildings
Buildings under lease
Capital works in progress
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
654
240,306
(112,316)
127,990
101,208
(69,763)
31,445
118,112
(49,660)
68,452
522
(512)
10
654
220,706
(81,162)
139,544
98,710
(52,076)
46,634
115,207
(30,722)
84,485
522
(476)
46
19,373
12,018
480,175
(232,251)
247,924
447,817
(164,436)
283,381
654
127,990
31,445
68,452
10
19,373
247,924
654
139,544
46,634
84,485
46
12,018
283,381
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
69
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
10. propertY, pLANt AND eQUipMeNt (coNtiNUeD)
[b] Reconciliations
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of property, plant and
equipment at the beginning and end of the current and previous
financial year:
Plant and equipment
Carrying amount at the beginning of the year
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Plant and equipment under lease
Carrying amount at the beginning of the year
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Buildings
Carrying amount at the beginning of the year
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Buildings under lease
Carrying amount at the beginning of the year
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Capital works in progress
Carrying amount at the beginning of the year
Additions
Transfers
Transfers to mine properties
Carrying amount at the end of the year
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
139,544
18,391
3,951
(52)
(33,844)
127,990
46,634
2,533
-
-
(17,722)
31,445
84,485
2,802
136
-
(18,971)
68,452
46
(36)
10
12,018
21,970
(4,087)
(10,528)
19,373
91,911
32,043
32,339
(1,530)
(15,219)
139,544
52,276
27,714
(11,847)
(277)
(21,232)
46,634
36,830
15,471
39,534
-
(7,350)
84,485
72
(26)
46
64,975
30,206
(60,026)
(23,137)
12,018
70
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
11. DeFerreD AcQUisitioN, expLorAtioN AND
eVALUAtioN costs
Deferred acquisition, exploration and evaluation costs carried forward
in respect of mining areas of interest:
Extension Hill
Koolan Island
Fields Find
Other
Reconciliation
Carrying amount at beginning of the year
Additions
Transferred to mine properties
Exploration expenditure written off
Carrying amount at the end of the year
12. MiNe properties
Mine development expenditure
Accumulated amortisation
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
68
160
584
49
861
344
1,640
(979)
(144)
861
62
282
-
-
344
309
1,125
(1,043)
(47)
344
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
Restated
1 July 2011
$’000
1,318,075
(656,862)
661,213
1,205,572
(532,513)
673,059
913,658
(456,249)
457,409
Reconciliation
Carrying amount at beginning of the year
Additions
Transferred from deferred acquisition,
exploration, evaluation and development costs
Transferred from capital works in progress
Deferred waste capitalised during the year
Amortisation expensed – deferred waste
Amortisation expensed – other
Derecognise opening deferred stripping balance
2[d]
2[d]
2[d]
1(e)
673,059
93
979
10,528
100,904
(97,544)
(26,806)
-
457,409
58,155
1,043
23,137
209,578
(53,268)
(22,995)
-
Carrying amount at the end of the year
661,213
673,059
The security pledged for financing facilities includes
mining mortgages over the mining tenements
and contractual rights to mine hermatite deposits
owned by the Group. Refer Note 14.
13. trADe AND otHer pAYABLes
Current
Trade creditors
Accruals and other payables
Notes
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
[a]
[a]
33,720
72,016
105,736
32,867
89,663
122,530
[a] Current trade creditors and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 day terms.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
71
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
14. iNterest-BeAriNG LoANs AND BorroWiNGs
Notes
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
Current
Lease liability
Hire purchase facility
Non-Current
Lease liability
Hire purchase facility
Financing facilities available
At reporting date, the following financing facilities had been negotiated
and were available:
Total facilities:
• Finance leases
• Hire purchase facility
• Contingent instrument facility
• Corporate debt
Facilities used at reporting date:
• Finance leases
• Hire purchase facility
• Contingent instrument facility
• Corporate debt
Facilities unused at reporting date:
• Finance leases
• Hire purchase facility
• Contingent instrument facility
• Corporate debt
[a]
[b]
[a]
[b]
[a]
[b]
[c]
[c]
1,197
17,991
19,188
-
9,204
9,204
1,197
27,195
65,000
-
93,392
1,197
27,195
58,625
-
87,017
-
-
6,375
-
6,375
1,769
19,933
21,702
1,197
24,125
25,322
2,966
44,058
65,000
50,000
162,024
2,966
44,058
57,743
-
104,767
-
-
7,257
50,000
57,257
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial facilities:
[a] Finance lease facility
Finance leases are repayable monthly with final instalments due in May 2014. Interest is charged at an average rate of 8.29% pa.
The facilities are secured by first mortgages over the leased assets.
[b] Hire purchase facility
Hire purchase arrangements have been entered into by Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd and Mount Gibson Mining Ltd via master lease
agreements with Komatsu Corporate Finance Pty Limited and National Australia Bank Limited. Hire purchase amounts are
repayable monthly with final instalments due in August 2016. Interest is charged at an average rate of 7.58% pa. The facilities are
secured by a first mortgage over the assets the subject of the hire purchase agreements and a guarantee from the Company.
This facility is drawn and repayable in A$.
[c] Corporate debt and contingent instrument facility
On 9 May 2011, the Company entered into a facility agreement for a $115,000,000 finance facility which expires on 30 June 2014
consisting of:
• Senior debt facility of $50,000,000 repayable as follows:
- $25,000,000 on 31 December 2013; and
- $25,000,000 on 30 June 2014.
• Contingent instrument facility of $65,000,000 (including guarantees and performance bonds).
On 22 April 2013, the Company cancelled the undrawn senior debt facility of $50,000,000.
The security pledge for the contingent instrument facility is a fixed and floating charge over all the assets and undertakings of
Mount Gibson Iron Limited, Mount Gibson Mining Limited, Geraldton Bulk Handling Limited, Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd and Aztec
Resources Limited together with mining mortgages over the mining tenements owned by Mount Gibson Mining Limited and
Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd and the contractual rights of Mount Gibson Mining Limited to mine hematite iron ore at Extension Hill.
72
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
15. DeriVAtiVe FiNANciAL LiABiLities
Current
Foreign currency forward contracts
Notes
30[b][i]
16. proVisioNs
Current
Employee benefits
Road resealing
Restructure
Non-Current
Employee benefits
Decommissioning rehabilitation
Movement in provisions:
Road resealing
Carrying amount at beginning of the year
Provision for period
Amounts utilised during the period
Carrying amount at end of the year
This provision relates to the forecast cost of roadworks associated
with the Tallering Peak mine site. The payments to the shires are
made annually.
Restructure
Carrying amount at beginning of the year
Provision for period
Amounts utilised during the period
Carrying amount at end of the year
This provision relates to the forecast costs associated with release of
personnel on closure of Tallering Peak, which is expected to occur in
June 2014.
Decommissioning rehabilitation
Carrying amount at beginning of the year
Provision for period
Amounts utilised during the period
Interest accretion on rehabilitation provision
Carrying amount at end of the year
This provision represents the present value of decommissioning
and rehabilitation costs on closure of the Tallering Peak, Koolan
Island and Extension Hill mines. The timing of decommissioning and
rehabilitation expenditure is dependent on the life of the mines, which
may vary in future.
Tallering Peak
Koolan Island
Extension Hill
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
4,607
4,607
6,314
633
5,437
12,384
1,057
77,580
78,637
433
400
(200)
633
4,158
2,674
(1,395)
5,437
77,432
-
(1,890)
2,038
77,580
8,584
61,313
7,683
77,580
393
393
6,012
433
4,158
10,603
666
77,432
78,098
100
333
-
433
-
4,158
-
4,158
23,666
52,779
-
987
77,432
10,406
59,569
7,457
77,432
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
73
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
17. issUeD cApitAL
[a] Ordinary shares
Issued and fully paid
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
568,328
564,710
2013
2012
Number
of shares
$’000
Number
of shares
$’000
[b] Movement in ordinary shares on issue
Beginning of the financial year
1,085,728,430
564,710
1,082,570,693
561,585
Exercise of performance rights
Shares issued under dividend
reinvestment plan
Shares issued – other
Deferred income tax on capital raising cost
-
4,855,802
-
-
-
3,523
-
95
294,906
2,717,071
145,760
-
-
3,020
199
(94)
End of the financial year
1,090,584,232
568,328
1,085,728,430
564,710
[c] Terms and conditions of contributed equity
Ordinary shares have the right to receive dividends as declared, and in the event of winding up the Company, to participate in the
proceeds from the sale of all surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts paid up on shares held. Ordinary shares
entitle their holder to one vote, either in person or by proxy, at a meeting of the Company.
Effective from 1 July 1998, the Corporations legislation abolished the concept of authorised capital and par values. Accordingly,
the Company does not have authorised capital nor a par value in respect of its issued shares.
[d] Share options
As at 30 June 2013, there were no options on issue (2012: 2,000,000) – see Note 21(b).
Share options carry no right to dividends and no voting rights.
[e] Performance rights
As at 30 June 2013, there were 904,908 performance rights on issue (2012: 271,318) – see Note 21(c).
[f] Capital management
The primary objective of the Group’s capital management is to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost
of capital.
The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or
adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue
new shares or other securities.
No changes were made in the objectives, policy or processes for managing capital during the years ended 30 June 2013 and 30
June 2012.
74
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
18. reserVes
Option premium reserve
Net unrealised gains/(losses) reserve
Other reserves
[a] Option premium reserve
The option premium reserve is used to record the value of equity
benefits provided to employees and directors as part of their
remuneration.
Balance at the beginning of the year
Share-based payments
Balance at the end of the year
[b] Net unrealised gains/(losses) reserve
This reserve records movement for available-for-sale financial
assets to fair value and gains and losses on hedging instruments
determined to be effective cash flow hedges.
Balance at the beginning of the year
Net gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
Deferred income tax on cash flow hedges
Balance at the end of the year
[c] Other reserves
This reserve is used to record the gain or loss arising from the
sale or acquisition of non-controlling interests to or from third
party investors.
Balance at the beginning of the year
Movement during the period
Balance at the end of the year
19. retAiNeD eArNiNGs
Balance at the beginning of the year
Dividends paid during the period
Net profit attributable to members of the Company
Balance at the end of the year
Notes
[a]
[b]
[c]
Notes
23(a)
2013
$’000
19,160
(3,225)
(3,192)
12,743
18,875
285
19,160
3,783
(9,798)
2,790
(3,225)
(3,192)
-
(3,192)
2013
$’000
487,162
(43,526)
157,342
600,978
2012
$’000
18,875
3,783
(3,192)
19,466
18,991
(116)
18,875
3,439
283
61
3,783
(3,192)
-
(3,192)
Restated
2012
$’000
390,103
(64,957)
162,016
487,162
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
75
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Notes
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
20. expeNDitUre coMMitMeNts
[a] Exploration expenditure commitments
Minimum obligations not provided for in the financial report and
are payable:
• Not later than one year
• Later than one year but not later than five years
• Later than five years
[b] Operating lease commitments
Minimum lease payments
• Not later than one year
• Later than one year but not later than five years
• Later than five years
[i]
[ii]
[c] Finance lease and hire purchase commitments
[iii]
Minimum lease payments
• Not later than one year
• Later than one year but not later than five years
Total minimum lease payments
Future finance charges
14
14
[iv]
Total lease liability accrued for:
Current
Finance leases and hire purchase facility
Non-current
Finance leases and hire purchase facility
[d] Property, plant and equipment commitments
Commitments contracted for at balance date but not recognised
as liabilities
• Not later than one year
• Later than one year but not later than five years
[e] Contractual commitments
Commitments for the payment of other mining and transport
contracts:
• Not later than one year
• Later than one year but not later than five years
890
2,588
2,658
6,136
17,305
8,258
1,055
26,618
20,571
9,643
30,214
(1,822)
28,392
545
1,978
2,653
5,176
19,761
15,564
-
35,325
24,451
26,984
51,435
(4,411)
47,024
19,188
21,702
9,204
28,392
25,322
47,024
244
-
244
3,323
-
3,323
71,299
98,854
170,153
69,998
105,555
175,553
[i] In order to maintain current rights to explore and mine the tenements at Tallering Peak, Koolan Island and Extension Hill, the Group is required to perform minimum exploration
work to meet the expenditure requirements specified by the Department of Mines and Petroleum.
[ii] Operating leases relates to leases for office space with an initial term of six years and leases for machinery which have an average term of 1.8 years.
[iii] Finance leases and hire purchase arrangements have an average term of 3.5 years with, in certain cases, the option to purchase the asset at the completion of the lease term
for a pre-agreed amount. The average discount rates implicit in the finance leases and hire purchase arrangements are 8.29% pa and 7.58% pa respectively (2012: 8.94% pa
and 7.48% pa respectively). Lease liabilities are secured by a charge over the leased assets.
[iv] The Group has contractual commitments to purchase property, plant and equipment relating principally to the construction of buildings at Koolan.
[v] Amounts disclosed as contractual commitments relate to contracts in respect of mining and transport that are not recognised as liabilities.
76
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
21. sHAre-BAseD pAYMeNt pLANs
Notes
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
(a) Recognised share-based payment (income)/expense
(Income)/expense arising from equity-settled share-based
payment transactions
2[e]
285
(116)
The share-based payment plans are described below. There have been no cancellations or modifications to any of the plans during
2013 and 2012.
(b) Employee share scheme
An employee share scheme has been established where the Company may, at the discretion of the Board, grant options over the
ordinary shares of the Company. The options, issued for nil consideration, are granted in accordance with performance guidelines
established by the Directors of the Company. All Directors, officers and employees are eligible for this scheme. No options were
issued during the year ended 30 June 2013. As at balance date the following options over unissued shares were on issue:
Exercise price
Vesting date / exercise period
110 cents
Vested 24 Oct 2010 – exercise on or before 23 Oct 2012
2013
Number
-
-
2012
Number
2,000,000
2,000,000
The remaining contractual life for the options on issue as at 30 June 2012 is less than one year.
Information with respect to the number of options granted and issued under the employee share scheme is as follows:
2013
2012
Weighted
average exercise
price (cents)
Number of
options
Weighted
average exercise
price (cents)
110.0
-
(110.0)
-
-
-
2,000,000
110.0
-
-
-
2,000,000
2,000,000
-
-
-
110.0
110.0
Number of
options
2,000,000
-
(2,000,000)
-
-
-
Balance at beginning of year
- granted
- forfeited
- exercised
Balance at year end
Exercisable at year end
(c) Performance rights plan
The Company has established the Mount Gibson Iron Limited Performance Rights Plan. Rights are granted at no cost to the
executives and convert into ordinary shares on completion by the executive of three years’ continuous service, subject to
satisfaction of specified performance hurdles related to the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) measured against
a comparator group of companies over the same period. The Board is currently undertaking a review of the hurdles within the
performance rights plan and may consider modification of the hurdles in future periods.
The vesting scale is as follows:
Percentile rank achieved
Proportion of target award vesting
>76th percentile
100%
> 51st percentile and ≤76th percentile
Pro rata allocation
51st percentile
<51st percentile
50%
0%
The following table lists the inputs to the model used for the performance rights plan:
Accounting grant date
Share price at accounting grant date
Risk free interest rate
Volatility factor
2013
2013
2012
19-Sep-2012
01-Jul-2012
30-Jun-2012
$0.90
2.55%
51%
$0.92
2.35%
51%
$1.03
2.67%
51%
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
77
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
21. sHAre-BAseD pAYMeNt pLANs (coNtiNUeD)
Information with respect to the number of performance rights granted and issued is as follows:
Balance at beginning of year
- granted
- vested
- lapsed/forfeited
Balance at year end
Exercisable at year end
22. eArNiNGs per sHAre
2013
Number of
performance
rights
2012
Number of
performance
rights
271,318
633,590
-
-
904,908
-
1,102,599
271,318
(294,906)
(807,693)
271,318
-
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted earnings per share amounts is calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company by
the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares
that would be issued on the conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares. 904,908 performance rights
on issue have not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the performance hurdles are yet to be met and the
performance rights have not vested.
The following reflects the income and share data used in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Profits used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share
157,342
162,016
2013
$’000
Restated
2012
$’000
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic
earnings per share
Effect of dilution
- Share options
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating
diluted earnings per share
Earnings per share (cents per share):
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Number of
shares
Number of
shares
1,088,961,197
1,083,055,540
-
341,357
1,088,961,197
1,083,396,897
14.45
14.45
14.96
14.95
Conversions, calls, subscriptions or issues after 30 June 2013
No options were outstanding at 30 June 2013. Since the end of the financial year, no shares have been issued upon vesting of
performance rights granted by the Company. There have been no other conversions to, calls of, or subscriptions for ordinary shares or
issues of potential ordinary shares since the balance date and before the completion of this report.
78
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
23. DiViDeNDs pAiD AND proposeD
Declared and paid during the year:
(a) Dividends on ordinary shares:
Maiden final fully franked dividend for 2011: 4.0 cents per share
Maiden interim fully franked dividend for 2012: 2.0 cents per share
Final fully franked dividend for 2012: 2.0 cents per share
Interim fully franked dividend for 2013: 2.0 cents per share
(b) Dividends not recognised at the end of the reporting period:
On 22 August 2013, the Company declared a final dividend on ordinary shares
in respect of the 2012/13 financial year of $0.02 per share fully franked. The total
amount of the dividend is $21,812,000. The dividend has not been provided for in
the 30 June 2013 financial statements.
(c) Franked dividends:
The amount of franking credits available for the subsequent financial year are:
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
-
-
21,714
21,812
43,526
43,303
21,654
-
-
64,957
Franking account balance as at the end of the financial year at 30%
41,670
6,232
Franking credits that will arise from the payment of income tax payable as at the
end of the financial year
The amount of franking credits available for future reporting periods:
Impact on the franking account of dividends proposed or declared before the
financial report was authorised for issue but not recognised as a distribution to
equity holders during the period
7,396
49,066
(9,348)
39,718
12,503
18,735
(9,306)
9,429
Tax rates
The tax rate at which paid dividends have been franked is 30%.
24. coNtiNGeNt LiABiLities
1.
2.
3.
4.
The Group has a performance bond facility drawn to a total of $58,625,000 (2012: $57,743,000). The performance bonds secure
the Group’s obligations relating to environmental matters and historical rail upgrades.
A dispute has arisen between Mount Gibson Mining Limited and a construction contractor. The contractor is seeking that Mount
Gibson Mining Limited pay an additional sum of $6,550,000 in connection with historical works. Mount Gibson Mining Limited
disputes that the additional sum is payable. The parties have commenced arbitration to resolve the matter.
A dispute has arisen between Mount Gibson Iron Limited and a third party regarding payment of an advisory fee in connection
with the Company’s takeover of Aztec Resources Limited in the 2006/07 financial year. The parties are involved in litigation
before the New South Wales Supreme Court in an attempt to resolve the matter. The third party claim is valued at approximately
$10,000,000. The Company disputes the validity of the claim and believes it will be successful in defending the claim.
A dispute has arisen between Mount Gibson Iron Limited and a third party regarding the amount of royalty payable in connection
with the Company’s mining operations at Extension Hill. The Company is in disagreement as to the amount of the royalty payable.
The disputed portion of the third party claim is dependent upon future iron ore prices and could be valued at approximately
$2,500,000 per year over the life of the mine.
5. Certain claims arising with customers, employees, consultants, and contractors have been made by or against certain controlled
entities in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve litigation or arbitration. The Directors do not consider the
outcome of any of these claims will have a material adverse impact on the financial position of the consolidated entity.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
79
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
25. KeY MANAGeMeNt persoNNeL DiscLosUres
[a] Compensation of Key Management Personnel
Short-term
Post employment
Long-term
Share-based payment
Termination payment
[b] Option holdings of Key Management Personnel
2013
$
3,592,171
182,865
1,917
277,592
-
2012
$
3,414,904
170,353
256
(115,988)
773,023
4,054,545
4,242,548
Balance at
beginning
of period
1 July
2012
Granted
as remun-
eration
Options
exercised
Net
change
Balance
at end of
period
30 June
2013
Vested at 30 June 2013
Not
Total
exercisable Exercisable
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30 June 2013
Directors
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
A Ferguson
Other KMP
J Beyer
P Kerr
K Bozanic
A Thomson
K Faulkner
D Stokes
Total
80
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Balance at
beginning
of period
1 July
2011
Granted
as remun-
eration
Options
exercised
Net
change
Balance
at end of
period
30 June
2012
Vested at 30 June 2012
Not
Total
exercisable Exercisable
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30 June 2012
Directors
G Hill
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
Lee SH
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
C Readhead
I Macliver
Cao Z
L Tonkin
Other KMP
J Beyer
A Rule
D Berg
D Stokes
K Faulkner
Total
[c] Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel
30 June 2013
Directors
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
A Ferguson
Other KMP
J Beyer
P Kerr
K Bozanic
A Thomson
K Faulkner
D Stokes
Total
Balance
1 July 2012
Ord
Granted as
remuneration
Ord
On exercise of
performance
rights
Ord
Net change
other
Ord
Balance
30 June 2013
Ord
70,000
-
-
-
-
-
20,000
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
190,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100,000
-
-
-
-
103,866
-
70,000
-
100,000
-
-
-
20,000
203,866
-
19,801
19,801
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
223,667
413,667
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
81
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
25. KeY MANAGeMeNt persoNNeL DiscLosUres (coNtiNUeD)
[c] Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel (continued)
30 June 2012
Directors
G Hill
A Jones
Chen Z
Lee SH
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
C Readhead
I Macliver
Cao Z
L Tonkin
Other KMP
J Beyer
A Rule
D Berg
D Stokes
K Faulkner
Total
Balance
1 July 2011
Ord
Granted as
remuneration
Ord
On exercise of
performance
rights
Ord
Net change
other
Ord
Balance
30 June 2012
Ord
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,000[1]
567,500
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,587,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
211,778
83,128
-
-
70,000
70,000
-
-
-
-
-
20,000
80,000
(567,500)[2]
(1,000,000)[3]
-
-
-
-
(83,128)[4]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,000
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
211,778
-
-
-
294,906
(1,480,628)
401,778
[1] Initial interest on appointment as at 16 November 2011
[2] Final interest on resignation as at 14 December 2011
[3] Final interest on resignation as at 16 November 2011
[4] Final interest on resignation as at 30 April 2012
All equity transactions with Key Management Personnel other than those arising from the exercise of remuneration options have been
entered into under terms and conditions no more favourable than those the entity would have adopted if dealing at arm’s length.
82
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
[d] Performance rights holdings by Key Management Personnel
30 June 2013
Directors
G Hill
Lee SH
A Jones
Chen Z
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
A Ferguson
Other KMP
J Beyer
P Kerr
K Bozanic
A Thomson
K Faulkner
D Stokes
Total
30 June 2012
Directors
G Hill
A Jones
Chen Z
Lee SH
Li S
R Barwick
S Bird
P Dougas
C Readhead
I Macliver
Cao Z
L Tonkin
Other KMP
J Beyer
A Rule
D Berg
D Stokes
K Faulkner
Total
Balance
1 July 2012
Granted as
remuneration
Vested during
year
Lapsed/
forfeited
during year
Balance
30 June 2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
271,318
-
-
-
-
-
271,318
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
243,450
121,340
-
134,420
-
109,560
608,770
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
514,768
121,340
-
134,420
-
109,560
880,088
Balance
1 July 2011
Granted as
remuneration
Vested during
year
Lapsed/
forfeited
during year
Balance
30 June 2012
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
535,985
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
271,318
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(535,985)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
271,318
382,846
183,768
-
-
-
-
-
-
(211,778)
(83,128)
-
-
(171,068)
(100,640)
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,102,599
271,318
(294,906)
(807,693)
271,318
[e] Loans to specified Key Management Personnel
There were no loans to Key Management Personnel during the year.
[f] Other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel
There were no other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel during the year.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
83
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
26. reLAteD pArtY DiscLosUre
Ultimate parent
Mount Gibson Iron Limited is the ultimate Australian parent company.
Director-related entity transactions
Sales
During all or part of the year Mr Li and Mr Chen were directors of Shougang Concord (SCIT) and Mr Lee, Mr Curry and Mr Ferguson
were directors of APAC.
The following sale agreements are in place with director-related entities:
•
•
•
•
The sale of 80% of iron ore from Tallering Peak’s production over the life of mine after 0.65 million (+/-10%) wet metric tonnes
(“WMT”) per year is provided to other customers to SCIT.
The sale of 20% of iron ore from Tallering Peak’s production over the life of mine after 0.65 million (+/-10%) WMT per year is
provided to other customers to APAC.
The sale of 80% of iron ore from Koolan Island’s available mined production over the life of mine to SCIT.
The sale of 20% of iron ore from Koolan Island’s available mined production over the life of mine to APAC.
Pursuant to these sales agreements, during the financial year, the Group:
•
•
Sold 1,180,188 WMT (2012: 1,203,488 WMT) of iron ore to APAC; and
Sold 3,360,446 WMT (2012: 2,883,959 WMT) of iron ore to SCIT.
Amounts recognised at the reporting date in relation to director-related entity transactions:
Assets and liabilities
Current assets
Trade receivables – APAC
Trade receivables – SCIT
Total trade receivables
Total assets
Current liabilities
Trade payables – APAC
Trade payables – SCIT
Total trade payables
Total liabilities
Revenues and Expenses
Sale of goods – APAC
Sale of goods – SCIT
Total sale of goods
2013
$’000
2,019
4,267
6,286
6,286
(1)
(11)
(12)
(12)
2012
$’000
426
8,133
8,559
8,559
-
2
2
2
104,721
361,204
465,925
116,331
387,059
503,390
Apart from the above, there are no director-related entity transactions other than those specified in Note 25.
27. AUDitor’s reMUNerAtioN
Amounts received or due and receivable by EY for:
•
An audit or review of the financial report of the entity and any other entity in the
consolidated entity
• Other services in relation to the entity and any other entity in the consolidated entity
2013
$
2012
$
254,395
231,885
13,285
267,680
-
231,885
84
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
28. seGMeNt iNForMAtioN
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Chief Executive Officer
and the executive management team in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources.
All operating segments have been aggregated to form one reportable segment representing the entity as a whole. The reportable
segments are based on aggregated operating segments determined by the similarity of economic characteristics and the segments
are similar in each of the following respects:
[i]
[ii]
the nature of the product mined and sold, being hematite iron ore;
the nature of the production process which involves mining and crushing of iron ore;
[iii]
the similarity of customers across the segments; and
[iv]
the similarities of the shipping method used to distribute the iron ore to market.
The accounting policies applied for internal reporting purposes are consistent with those applied in the preparation of the financial
statements. During the year ended 30 June 2013, revenue received from the sale of iron ore was comprised of the following buyers who
each on a proportionate basis equated to greater than 10% of total sales for the period:
Customer
# 1
# 2
# 3
# 4
Other
2013
$’000
351,127
136,398
113,087
107,248
135,951
843,811
During the year ended 30 June 2012, revenue received from the sale of iron ore was comprised of the following buyers who each on a
proportionate basis equated to greater than 10% of total sales for the period:
Customer
# 1
# 2
# 3
# 4
Other
2012
$’000
387,059
116,331
59,140
47,209
27,272
637,011
Revenue from external customers by geographical location is based on location of the customer. In the 2012 financial year, all iron ore
was shipped to China. In the 2013 financial year, approximately 2% of the iron ore sales were sold on a mine gate basis to a local buyer,
with the vast majority of the balance shipped to China.
All segment assets are located within Australia.
29. eVeNts AFter tHe BALANce sHeet DAte
On 22 August 2013, the Company declared a final dividend on ordinary shares in respect of the 2012/13 financial year of $0.02 per
share fully franked. The total amount of the dividend is $21,812,000. The dividend has not been provided for in the 30 June 2013
financial statements.
Subsequent to the end of the period, the Board approved the award of certain amounts under the Company’s short-term and long-term
incentive plans to members of executive management team. These amounts have been included in the financial statements and Directors’
report for the year.
As at the date of this report there are no significant events after balance date of the Company or of the Group that require adjustment
of or disclosure in this report.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
85
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
30. FiNANciAL iNstrUMeNts
[a] Financial risk management objectives
The Group’s principal financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise bank loans, finance leases and hire purchase
contracts, cash and short-term deposits.
The main purpose of these financial instruments is to raise finance for the Group’s operations.
The Group has various other financial instruments such as trade debtors and trade creditors, which arise directly from its operations.
The Group also enters into derivatives transactions, principally forward currency contracts, and from time to time also enters into
foreign currency collar options and interest rate swaps. The purpose is to manage the currency and interest rate risks arising from
the Group’s operations and its sources of finance.
The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, commodity
price risk and liquidity risk. The Board reviews and agrees management’s recommended policies for managing each of these
risks, as summarised below.
[b] Foreign currency risk
The Group is exposed to the risk of adverse movement in the A$ compared to the US$ as its iron ore sales receipts are
denominated in US$. The Group uses derivative financial instruments to manage specifically identified foreign currency exposures
by hedging a proportion of forecast US$ sales transactions in accordance with its risk management policy. The primary objective
of using derivative financial instruments is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows attributable to changes in the A$/US$
exchange rate and to protect against adverse movements in this rate.
The Group recognises derivative financial instruments at fair value at the date the derivative contract is entered into. The Group
applies hedge accounting to forward foreign currency contracts that meet the criteria of cash flow hedges.
During the period from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013, the Group delivered into US dollar foreign exchange forward contracts
totalling US$309,999,994 at a weighted average exchange rate of A$1.00/US$1.0064.
At 30 June 2013, the notional amount of the foreign exchange hedge book totalling US$55,000,000 is made up as follows:
•
Forward contracts totalling US$55,000,000 due in the 12 months ending 30 June 2014 and with a weighted average
contract rate of A$1.00/US$0.9860.
As at 30 June 2013, the mark-to-market loss on the total outstanding US dollar foreign exchange hedge book of US$55,000,000
was A$4,606,687.
It is the Group’s policy to negotiate the terms of the hedge derivatives to match the terms of the hedged item to maximise hedge
effectiveness.
The Group uses the following derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk:
Instrument
Type of Hedging
Objective
Forward exchange contracts
Cash flow hedge
To hedge sales receipts against cash flow volatility
arising from the fluctuation of A$/US$ exchange rate.
[i]
Foreign exchange contracts – cash flow hedges
The Group has entered into forward exchange contracts at the reporting date designed as a hedge of anticipated future receipts
that will be denominated in US$.
At balance date, the following foreign exchange contracts were outstanding:
2013
2012
Average
contract
rate
A$/US$
US$
$’000
Contract
value
A$
$’000
Fair
value
A$
$’000
Average
contract
rate
A$/US$
US$
$’000
Contract
value
A$
$’000
Fair
value
A$
$’000
Forward exchange
contracts
- within one year
Total
0.9860
0.9860
55,000
55,000
55,781
55,781
(4,607)
0.9900
200,000
202,012
(4,607)
0.9900
200,000
202,012
5,191
5,191
86
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Current assets (note 8)
Current liabilities (note 15)
Total forward exchange contracts
Movement in forward exchange contract cash flow hedge reserve:
Opening balance
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges net of tax
Transferred from/(to) revenue in Income Statement net of tax
Closing balance
Cash flow hedge ineffectiveness recognised immediately in profit and loss
[ii]
Foreign currency sensitivity
2013
$’000
-
(4,607)
(4,607)
5,191
(18,860)
9,062
(4,607)
-
2012
$’000
5,584
(393)
5,191
323
(6,585)
11,453
5,191
-
The following table details the effect on profit after tax and other comprehensive income after tax of a 10% change in the A$ against
the US$ from the spot rates at 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012 due to changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities.
10% appreciation in the A$ spot rate
with all other variables held constant
10% depreciation in the A$ spot rate
with all other variables held constant
Net profit
Other comprehensive income
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
(749)
915
601
23,007
(7,907)
(19,461)
2013
$’000
(2,268)
2,772
The sensitivity analysis of the Group’s exposure to the foreign currency risk at balance date has been determined based on the
change in value due to foreign exchange movement based on exposures at Balance Sheet date. A positive number indicates an
increase in profit and other comprehensive income.
At balance date, the Group’s exposure to foreign currency risks on financial assets and financial liabilities, excluding derivatives,
are as follows:
Financial assets
Cash
Trade receivables
Financial liabilities
Trade payables
Net exposure
(included within Note 4)
(included within Note 6)
(included within Note 13)
Consolidated
2013
$’000
6,536
29,146
(43)
35,639
2012
$’000
1,149
10,755
(136)
11,768
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
87
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
30. FiNANciAL iNstrUMeNts (coNtiNUeD)
[c]
Interest rate risk
The Group’s exposure to market interest rates relates primarily to the Group’s long-term debt obligations and cash equivalents.
The Group’s policy is to manage its interest costs using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt.
The Group regularly analyses its interest income rate exposure. Within this analysis, consideration is given to potential renewals
of existing positions and alternative financing.
At balance date, the Group’s exposure to interest rate risks on financial assets and financial liabilities are as follows:
Fixed interest rate maturing in:
Floating
interest rate
1 year or less
Over 1 to 5 years
Non-interest
bearing
Total carrying
amount per
Balance Sheet
Weighted
average interest
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
2013
%
2012
%
Consolidated
i) Financial assets
Cash
47,014
40,673
-
Short-term deposits
Term deposits
Trade and other
receivables
Derivatives
Total financial
assets
ii) Financial liabilities
Trade and other
payables
Derivatives
Lease liabilities
Hire purchase
Total financial
liabilities
-
-
-
15,000
- 314,000 252,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
47,014
40,673 329,000 252,000
-
-
-
-
1,197
1,769
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
5
-
47,018
40,678
15,000
-
- 314,000 252,000
1.12
3.78
4.00
2.82
-
5.65
47,301
23,792
47,301
23,792
-
5,584
-
5,584
47,305
29,381 423,319 322,054
- 105,736 122,530 105,736 122,530
-
4,607
393
4,607
393
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,991
19,933
9,204
24,125
1,197
-
-
-
-
1,197
2,966
27,195
44,058
8.29
7.58
8.94
7.48
19,188
21,702
9,204
25,322 110,343 122,923 138,735 169,947
[i]
Interest rate sensitivity
The following table details the effect on profit and other comprehensive income after tax of a 1% change in interest rates at
30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012.
• 1% increase in interest rate with
all other variables held constant
• 1% decrease in interest rate with
all other variables held constant
Net profit
Other comprehensive income
2013
$’000
2,303
(2,303)
2012
$’000
1,764
(1,764)
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
-
-
-
-
The sensitivity analysis of the Group’s exposure to Australian variable interest rates at balance date has been determined based
on exposures at Balance Sheet date. A positive number indicates an increase in profit and equity.
[d] Credit risk
The Group’s maximum exposures to credit risk at balance date in relation to each class of recognised financial assets, other than
derivatives, is the carrying amount of those assets as indicated in the Balance Sheet.
In relation to derivative financial instruments, whether recognised or unrecognised, credit risk arises from the potential failure of
counterparties to meet their obligations under the contract or arrangement. The Group’s maximum credit risk exposure in relation
to forward exchange contracts is the full amount of the foreign currency it will be required to pay or purchase when settling the
forward exchange contract, should the counterparty not pay the currency it is committed to deliver to the Group.
The Group minimises concentrations of credit risk in relation to trade receivables by undertaking transactions with a number of
customers and by the use of advance payments and letters of credit which guarantee at least 90% of receivable amount at the
time of sale.
88
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
Credit risk from balances with banks and financial institutions is managed in accordance with a Board approved policy. Investments
of surplus funds are made only with approved counterparties with an acceptable Standard & Poors short-term credit rating and
within credit limits assigned to each counterparty. Counterparty credit limits are reviewed by the Board on an annual basis, and
may be updated throughout the year. The limits are set to minimise the concentration of risks and therefore mitigate financial
loss through potential counterparty failure. No material exposure is presently considered to exist by virtue of the possible non
performance of the counterparties to financial instruments.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group.
[e] Commodity price risk
The Group’s operations are exposed to commodity price risk as the Group sells iron ore to its customers. The Group’s sales
revenue is derived under long-term sales contracts for the life of mine at each of its operations. The pricing mechanism in these
contracts reflects a market based clearing index. The pricing mechanism adopts the Platts Iron Ore Index Price (“Platts Index”)
which is published daily for iron ore “fines” with Fe content ranging from 52% to 65% and is quoted on a US$ per dry metric tonne
“Cost and Freight” North China basis. The price to be paid by Mount Gibson’s customers is based on the applicable Platts Index
for the type and quality of ore delivered and reflects the average Platts Index for the preceding or the actual calendar month of the
iron ore shipment. The average monthly Platts Index is converted to an “Free On Board” price per dry metric tonne by deducting
the calculated shipping freight costs utilising corresponding shipping average monthly indices for Panamax vessels from the ports
of Geraldton and Koolan Island to Qingdao in China. “Lump” iron ore receives a premium to the published Platts Index “fines” price
and is determined every one to six months depending on the relevant sales contract.
Revenue on sales is recognised based on provisional priced sales and is subject to final adjustments between 30 to 120 days
after shipment and delivery. There are limited available financial instruments available to hedge the iron ore price and the Group
has yet to enter into such arrangements.
[f] Liquidity risk
The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of its cash reserves,
finance leases and hire purchase contracts. The Group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual
cash flows and matching maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
The Group’s capital risk management objectives are to safeguard the business as a going concern, to maximise returns for
shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure in order to reduce the cost of capital
(being equity and debt).
Mount Gibson does not have a target debt/equity ratio but has a policy of maintaining a flexible financing structure so as to be
able to take advantage of new investment opportunities that may arise.
At 30 June 2013, the Group had unutilised standby credit facilities totalling $6,375,000 (2012: $57,257,000). Refer Note 14.
The table below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period from the
Balance Sheet date to the contractual maturity date. As the amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash
flows, these balances will not necessarily agree with the amounts disclosed in the Balance Sheet.
30 June 2013
30 June 2012
Less
than 6
months
$’000
6 to 12
months
$’000
1 to 5
years
$’000
Over 5
years
$’000
Total
$’000
Less
than 6
months
$’000
6 to 12
months
$’000
1 to 5
years
$’000
Over 5
years
$’000
Total
$’000
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
105,736
Lease liabilities
Hire purchases
-
931
-
-
338
11,336
7,964
9,643
Derivatives – gross inflow
(51,200)
Derivatives – gross outflow
55,807
-
-
-
-
122,017
8,895
9,643
[g] Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
105,736
122,530
-
-
1,269
741
1,203
1,269
28,943
11,604
10,903
25,714
(51,200)
(185,662)
(21,671)
55,807
181,368
20,775
-
-
140,555
130,581
11,210
26,983
-
-
-
-
-
-
122,530
3,213
48,221
(207,333)
202,143
168,774
The carrying amounts and fair values of the financial assets and financial liabilities for the Group are shown below.
The fair value representing the marked to market value of a financial asset or a financial liability is the amount at which the asset
could be exchanged or liability settled in a current transaction between willing parties after allowing for transaction costs.
The fair values of cash, short-term deposits, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables and other short-term
borrowings approximate their carrying values, as a result of their short maturity or because they carry floating rates of interest.
The fair values of derivative financial instruments are determined using the Level 2 method requiring fair value to be calculated
using observable market inputs. The Group’s fair values under the Level 2 method are sourced from an independent valuation
by the Group’s treasury advisors. The valuation techniques use prevailing market inputs sourced from Reuters/Bloomberg to
determine an appropriate mid price valuation.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
89
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
30. FiNANciAL iNstrUMeNts (coNtiNUeD)
[g] Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities (continued)
Financial assets - current
Cash
Short-term deposits
Term deposits
Trade debtors
Other receivables
Derivatives
Financial liabilities – current
Trade and other payables
Lease and hire purchase liabilities
Derivatives
Financial liabilities – non current
Lease and hire purchase liabilities
2013
2012
Carrying amount
$’000
Fair value
$’000
Carrying amount
$’000
Fair value
$’000
47,018
15,000
314,000
37,705
9,596
-
47,018
15,000
314,000
37,705
9,596
-
40,678
-
252,000
13,432
10,360
5,584
40,678
-
252,000
13,432
10,360
5,584
423,319
423,319
322,054
322,054
105,736
19,188
4,607
129,531
9,204
9,204
105,736
19,188
4,607
129,531
9,204
9,204
122,530
21,702
393
144,625
25,322
25,322
122,530
21,702
393
144,625
25,322
25,322
Net financial assets
284,584
284,584
152,107
152,107
31. pAreNt eNtitY iNForMAtioN
[a]
Information relating to Mount Gibson Iron Limited:
Current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Issued capital
Accumulated losses
Share-based payments reserve
Total shareholders’ equity
Net profit/(loss) after tax of the parent entity
Total comprehensive income/(loss) of the parent entity
2013
$’000
2012
$’000
454
659,811
26,466
209,990
568,328
(137,667)
19,160
449,821
24,404
24,404
846
670,726
10,215
205,593
564,805
(118,546)
18,874
465,133
(46,429)
(46,429)
[b] Details of any guarantees entered into by the parent entity
There are cross guarantees given by Mount Gibson Iron Limited in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries as described in Note 9.
The parent entity has further provided bank guarantees in respect of obligations to various authorities. Refer to Note 14.
[c] Details of any contingent liabilities of the parent entity
The parent entity had contingent liabilities as at reporting date as set out in Note 24. For information about guarantees given by
the parent entity, refer [b] above.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited guarantees the performance of Mount Gibson Mining Limited’s obligations to Aurizon entities under
the Transport Access Agreement made on 26 June 2008 as amended and restated on 30 June 2009. In accordance with this
agreement, Mount Gibson Mining Limited agrees to reimburse Aurizon for track access charges properly due and payable to
Brookfield, the rail infrastructure owner.
90
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Notes to tHe coNsoLiDAteD FiNANciAL report
for the year ended 30 June 2013
[d] Details of any contractual commitments by the parent entity for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment
There are no contractual commitments by the parent entity for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment as at reporting date.
[e] Tax consolidation
The Company and its 100% owned controlled entities have formed a tax consolidated group. Members of the Group entered into a
tax sharing arrangement in order to allocate income tax expense to the wholly owned controlled entities. The agreement provides
for the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations.
At balance date, the possibility of default is remote. The head entity of the tax consolidated group is Mount Gibson Iron Limited.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
91
Directors’ DecLArAtioN
Directors’ Declaration
In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Mount Gibson Iron Limited, I state that:
1.
In the opinion of the Directors:
a.
the financial statements, notes and the additional disclosures included in the Directors’ Report designated as audited of the
Group are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
i)
giving a true and fair view of the financial position of the Group as at 30 June 2013 and of its performance for the year
ended on that date; and
ii)
complying with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
b.
c.
the financial statements and notes also comply with International Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1; and
there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and
payable.
2.
This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the Directors in accordance with section
295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2013.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
G HILL
Chairman
Perth, 22 August 2013
92
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
iNDepeNDeNt AUDitor’s report
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
93
iNDepeNDeNt AUDitor’s report
94
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
tHe BoArD AND corporAte GoVerNANce
The Company’s Board is committed to protecting and enhancing shareholder value and conducting the Company’s business ethically
and in accordance with high standards of corporate governance. In determining those standards the Company has reference to ASX
Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (2nd edition with 2010 amendments – “ASX
Recommendations”). The Company believes that its practices are consistent with the ASX Recommendations.
The Board undertook a complete review of the Company’s corporate governance policies during the year ended 30 June 2012. Since
then the Company continues to review and improve its governance practices consistent with the ASX Recommendations and make
changes as appropriate, having regard to the nature and scale of the Company’s business.
A description of the Company’s main corporate governance practices is set out below. These practices reflect the Company’s existing
corporate governance policies. Copies of the relevant policies are available in the corporate governance section of the Company’s
website at www.mtgibsoniron.com.au.
tHe roLe oF tHe BoArD AND tHe BoArD cHArter
The Board operates in accordance with the broad principles set out in the Company’s Board Charter, a copy of which is available
from the Company’s website. The Board is responsible for guiding and monitoring the performance of the Company on behalf of
shareholders, to whom they are accountable. Day to day management of the Company’s affairs and the implementation of corporate
strategies and policy initiatives are delegated by the Board to the Chief Executive Officer and the senior executives as set out in the
Board Charter.
The Board Charter sets out the powers and responsibilities of the Board, including:
•
•
•
•
•
charting the direction of the Company, formulating and adopting policies, strategies and financial objectives, and ensuring
appropriate resources are available to management;
monitoring the implementation of policies and strategies, and achievement of those financial objectives and performance against
the strategic plan and budgets; and
monitoring compliance with control and accountability systems, regulatory requirements and ethical standards;
ensuring the preparation of accurate financial reports and statements; and
encouraging a culture that promotes ethical and responsible decision-making, compliance with legal responsibilities and
transparency through effective and timely disclosure.
Specific powers reserved to the Board in the Board Charter include:
•
•
•
•
•
appointing, removing and monitoring the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and Company Secretary, determining their
terms and conditions of employment and ratifying other key executive appointments and planning for executive succession;
reviewing and approving systems of risk management and internal control and compliance, codes of conduct and legal
compliance;
reviewing and approving financial and other reporting;
reviewing and approving major capital expenditure, capital management and acquisitions and divestitures; and
approving the issue of any shares, options or other securities in the Company.
A statement on Board and management functions, which sets out those matters reserved to the Board and the roles and responsibilities
of senior management, is available on the Company’s website.
cHieF execUtiVe oFFicer
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for running the affairs of the Company under delegated authority from the Board and
implementing the policies and strategy set by the Board. In carrying out his responsibilities, the Chief Executive Officer must:
•
•
•
•
report directly to the Board;
provide prompt and full information to the Board regarding the conduct of the business of the Company;
comply with the reasonable directions of the Board; and
have regard to the requirements of the ASX Listing Rules and expectations of stakeholders and the wider investment community.
coNFLict oF iNterest poLicY
The Board has adopted a Conflict of Interest Policy which establishes a protocol under which each Director is required to disclose
certain interests and advise the Board in circumstances where a potential conflict of interest may arise. The Conflict of Interest Policy
also sets out the procedures to be followed where the Chairman determines that a Director’s interest in a matter may result in a conflict
of interest occurring.
The Board has established a Contracts Committee to handle negotiations and disputes between the Company and its major
shareholders regarding contractual matters such as offtake arrangements.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
95
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
BoArD coMpositioN
As at the date of this report the Company has eight Directors. All are Non-Executive Directors, including the Chairman.
Board composition, size and structure will be reviewed annually to ensure that the Non-Executive Directors between them bring the
range of skills, knowledge and experience necessary to direct the Company. The skills, knowledge and experience which the Board
considers to be particularly relevant include qualifications and experience in the areas of mining, engineering and project management,
accounting and finance, commodities, mergers and acquisitions. The Board is not considering the appointment of additional Directors
at this time and considers that its current membership has an appropriate mix of the requisite skills, knowledge, experience and
independence for current business needs.
The Board, with the assistance of the Nomination, Remuneration and Governance Committee (“NRGC”), regularly reviews its membership
to ensure that it has the appropriate mix of skills and experience required to meet the needs of the Company. When a Board position
becomes vacant or additional Directors are required, external professional advisers are engaged to assist with identifying potential
candidates and to ensure that a diverse range of candidates is considered.
All Directors, excluding the Managing Director (if any), are required to retire and may stand for re-election by shareholders, at the third
Annual General Meeting (AGM) following their election or most recent re-election.
Details of skills, experience and relevant expertise for each Director in office as at the date of the Annual Report, and the period for
which each Director has held office, are set out on page 22.
Director iNDepeNDeNce
The ASX Recommendations define an independent director as a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who
is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with – or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere
with – the independent exercise of their judgement. The Board determines the independence of Directors.
As announced in November 2011, the Company received an expression of concern from the Foreign Investment Review Board (“FIRB”)
about whether the Board had a majority of independent directors as required by Recommendation 2.1 of the ASX Recommendations.
In response, the Company worked with its legal and financial advisers (and remained in close communication with the FIRB) in order to
address this issue. This work included completing a process of Board renewal which saw the appointment of three new independent
Directors.
The Board has now determined that five of the eight directors currently in office (Messrs Hill, Jones, Dougas, Barwick and Bird) are
independent. In July 2012 FIRB informed the Company that on the basis of steps taken and information provided by the Company, it
was satisfied that the structure of the Company’s Board was now consistent with Principle 2 of the ASX Recommendations insofar as
it relates to the independence of directors.
In determining “independence” the Board assesses independence with reference to whether a Director is non-executive, is not a
member of management, and is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with, or could reasonably be
perceived to materially interfere with, the independent exercise of their judgement. In making this assessment the Board considers all
relevant facts and circumstances. As directed by the ASX Recommendations, the Board in assessing independence considers whether
a Director:
•
•
•
•
•
is a substantial shareholder of the Company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the
Company;
is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member, and there has
not been a period of at least three years between ceasing such employment and serving on the Board;
has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the Company or
another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided;
is a material supplier or customer of the Company or other group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or
indirectly with a material supplier or customer;
has a material contractual relationship with the Company or another group member other than as a Director.
Having reference to the above factors, the Board has determined that the following Directors are not classified as independent:
•
•
•
Mr Lee is a Non-Executive Director of APAC Resources Limited, which is a substantial shareholder and holds a controlling
interests in a major offtake customer of the Group. Mr Lee is also an Executive Director of Allied Group Limited and Allied
Properties (H.K.) Limited, both of which are deemed to be substantial shareholders of the Company.
Mr Li Shao Feng is Chairman of Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited, which is also a substantial shareholder and holds
a controlling interest in a major offtake customer of the Group.
Mr Chen is Vice Chairman and Managing Director of Shougang Fushan Resources Group Limited.
Directors’ Access to iNDepeNDeNt ADVice
The Company recognises that, from time to time, a Director may need to obtain independent expert advice in order to discharge that
Director’s duties. Any reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining that advice will be met by the Company, provided advance approval
is obtained in accordance with the Board Charter. This approval is not to be unreasonably withheld.
96
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
BoArD MeetiNGs
The Board meets at least six times each year, and full Board meetings are usually held every two months. Meetings are convened
outside the scheduled dates to consider issues of importance that arise from time to time. Board members are encouraged to visit the
Group’s operations at least once per year. The Board has sought to reduce the frequency of Board meetings to six times a year to take
into account the increased number of Committee meetings now being held.
Directors’ attendance at Board and Committee meetings is detailed on page 31.
BoArD coMMittees
The Board has established an Audit and Financial Risk Management Committee, a Nomination, Remuneration and Governance
Committee, a Contracts Committee, and an Operational Risk and Sustainability Committee.
Audit and Financial Risk Committee (“AFRC”)
The AFRC is currently comprised of Simon Bird, Alan Jones, and Geoff Hill. Mr Bird is currently the Chair of the AFRC. The AFRC
has a formal charter and usually meets four times during a financial year. A copy of the Charter is located on the Company’s website.
Committee members’ attendance at AFRC meetings is detailed on page 31.
The AFRC’s overall role is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for the Company’s financial reporting and audit, internal control
and financial risks. During the 2012 financial year the Board strengthened the audit and risk management framework by introducing
an internal audit function. In addition, as part of that governance review, the Board established the Operational Risk and Sustainability
Committee (“ORSC”) to enhance the oversight of operational risk issues, leaving the AFRC to focus primarily on financial risks.
The AFRC’s specific responsibilities now include:
•
Assist the Board to meet its oversight responsibilities in relation to:
(i)
(ii)
the Company’s financial reporting obligations;
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in relation to financial matters, including accounting standards;
(iii)
financial internal control structure;
(iv)
financial risk management procedures; and
(v)
the internal and external audit functions.
•
•
•
•
•
Oversee the Company’s relationship with the external auditors and the external audit function generally.
Oversee the Company’s relationship with the internal auditors and the internal audit function generally.
Oversee the preparation of the financial statements and reports to ensure that they are fair and accurate and comply with the
requirements of the Corporations Act and the applicable accounting standards.
Monitor the Company’s financial controls and systems to ensure that they are in place and operating effectively.
Manage the Company’s processes of identifying and managing financial risk and review the Company’s effectiveness in doing so.
The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, internal and external auditors normally attend AFRC meetings however there are
occasions where there are meetings just between the auditors and Committee members.
Information on the procedures for selection and appointment of the internal and external auditor, and for the rotation of external audit
engagement partners, is set out in the Company’s policy on external audit. Copies of these policies, together with a summary of the
Company’s risk policy are located on the Company’s website.
Nomination, Remuneration and Governance Committee (“NRGC”)
The NRGC is currently comprised of Geoff Hill, Alan Jones, and Russell Barwick. Mr Hill is currently the Chair of this Committee.
The NRGC has a formal charter and normally meets at least four times during a financial year. A copy of the Charter is located on the
Company’s website. Committee members’ attendance at NRGC meetings is detailed on page 31.
The NRGC’s specific responsibilities include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
reviewing and recommending to the Board the size and composition of the Board;
recommending prospective candidates for appointment to the Board;
recommending and assisting in the implementation of the process for Board and Director evaluation;
making recommendations to the Board on remuneration of Directors and senior executives;
ensuring the performance of the Chief Executive Officer is reviewed by the Chairman as provided in the remuneration policy; and
review and implementation of corporate governance policies.
Details of the structure of Directors’ and senior executives’ remuneration are set out in the Directors’ Report.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
97
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
Operational Risk and Sustainability Committee (“ORSC”)
The ORSC was established during the 2012 financial year as part of the Company’s governance review and in particular to enhance
the risk management process for the Company in respect of operational matters. The ORSC is currently comprised of Russell Barwick,
Paul Dougas, and Chen Zhouping. Mr Barwick is currently the Chair of this Committee.
The ORSC has a formal charter and normally meets at least four times during a financial year. A copy of the Charter is located on the
Company’s website. Committee members’ attendance at ORSC meetings is detailed on page 31.
The ORSC’s specific responsibilities include:
•
•
•
assisting the Board to monitor and understand the Company’s business and operations so as to assess if operating risks and
sustainability actions are being managed;
monitoring operational risks and sustainable performance associated with occupational health and safety, environment, development,
community and stakeholder relationships, human resources management and optimisation, legal and regulatory compliance,
geological resources and reserves, mining, geotechnical, transport and infrastructure, marketing and business risk; and
reviewing and reporting to the Board as to whether the risk management program is operating effectively, including identification
of risk, management of risks, remedial actions for areas of weakness, and auditing processes.
As noted above, a summary of the Company’s risk policy is located on the Company’s website.
Contracts Committee (“CC”)
The CC was established during the 2012 financial year as part of the Company’s governance review to provide an independent
Committee to oversee management’s interaction with substantial shareholders regarding areas of major contractual negotiation and
disputes. The Committee is comprised of independent Directors including Paul Dougas, Alan Jones, Russell Barwick, and Simon Bird.
Mr Dougas is currently the Chair of this Committee.
The CC has a formal charter and normally meets at least two times during a financial year. A copy of the Charter is located on the
Company’s website. Committee members’ attendance at CC meetings is detailed on page 31.
The CC’s specific responsibilities include:
•
•
•
overseeing the work of management in managing and resolving issues and disputes arising as between the Company and
substantial shareholders;
engaging with substantial shareholders to ensure there is a common understanding of the relationship and business dealings; and
handling all matters in a balanced and sensitive manner with proper regard to the overall best interests of the Company and all
shareholders.
corporAte reportiNG
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have made the following certifications to the Board with respect to the 2013
accounts:
•
•
that the financial statements and notes give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the Company and
Group and comply with the Corporations Act 2001 and relevant accounting standards; and
that the above statement is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating
effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
secUrities DeALiNG poLicY
The Company has a policy imposing restraints on Directors and Key Management Personnel dealing in the Company’s securities.
The policy is aimed at minimising the risk of Directors and Key Management Personnel contravening insider trading laws, ensuring the
Company is able to meet its reporting obligations under the ASX Listing Rules and increasing transparency with respect to trading in
the Company’s securities by Directors and Key Management Personnel. A copy of this policy is located on the Company’s website.
Under the policy, Key Management Personnel must not at any time engage in short-term trading in securities of the Company.
Furthermore, executives are prohibited from entering into arrangements to protect the value of unvested entitlements under equity-
based remuneration plans.
FiNANciAL reportiNG
Consistent with ASX Governance Principle 4.1, the Company’s financial report preparation and approval process for the financial year
ended 30 June 2013 involved both the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer providing detailed representations to the
Board covering:
•
•
•
•
compliance with the Company’s accounting policies and relevant accounting standards;
the accuracy of the financial statements and that they provide a true and fair view;
integrity and objectivity of the financial statements; and
effectiveness of the system of risk management and internal control.
98
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
iNDeMNities
The Company has entered into deeds of access, indemnity and insurance with each Director. These deeds provide:
•
•
•
rights of access to Company documentation;
rights of indemnification against liability arising from conduct of the Company’s and Group’s business; and
commitments that the Company will provide Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage,
subject in all cases to limitations imposed by law.
Directors’ AND seNior execUtiVes’ perForMANce eVALUAtioN AND reMUNerAtioN
During the reporting period the Board commenced a formal process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its Committees and
individual Directors. The performance evaluation process was substantially completed in September 2013. The process for review
involved Board members responding to a series of questions and those answers being compiled into a report so as to identify areas of
strength and weakness with the objective of improving the overall performance of the team. The evaluation process involved questions
directed at both individual and team performance.
The NRGC annually evaluates the performance of senior executives against both financial and non-financial, corporate and individual
performance measures. For the reporting period, the NRGC undertook a review of the Chief Executive Officer and all the senior
executives against these performance measures. The review was completed in September 2013. Further information about the
performance measures are detailed in the remuneration report on pages 32-38.
The Company’s policy and procedure for selection and appointment of new Directors and its Remuneration Policy are available on
its website.
coNtiNUoUs DiscLosUre AND sHAreHoLDer coMMUNicAtioNs
The Company has established a continuous disclosure policy, identifying the procedure for executives in identifying material price
sensitive information and reporting that information to the Company Secretary for review. The Company Secretary has primary
responsibility for ensuring that ASX disclosure requirements are met.
The Company has also adopted a policy for shareholder communications in order to promote effective communication with shareholders
and encouraging participation at the Company’s annual general meeting.
Copies of each of these policies are located on the Company’s website.
Shareholders may elect to receive company reports by mail or e-mail.
risK MANAGeMeNt
The Company recognises that there are multiple risks inherent in everything it does, including financial, operational, safety, legal and
compliance, geotechnical, and environmental risks, including loss of opportunities, all of which may impact the success of the business.
The Company is committed to developing and maintaining a risk management system that effectively identifies and controls all areas
of substantial risk to the business.
The Company is committed to ensuring risk management is integrated across the business.
The key elements of the Company’s risk management policy include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
identifying and ranking key business risks based on approved risk ranking criteria;
developing policies and procedures to identify, manage, control and report key risks;
provide for remedial action and auditing process;
having adequate crisis management and business continuity plans;
insurance programs to transfer residual risk; and
reporting to the Board of high level risks.
The Board has delegated responsibility to the AFRC (financial risks) and OSRC (operational and other risks) to review and report to the
Board that:
•
•
•
•
the Company’s ongoing risk management program has effectively identified all areas of material business risk during the financial
year;
adequate policies and procedures have been designed and implemented to manage identified risks;
a regular program of audits is undertaken to test the adequacy of and compliance with prescribed policies; and
proper remedial action is undertaken to redress areas of weakness.
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
99
corporAte GoVerNANce stAteMeNt
risK MANAGeMeNt (coNtiNUeD)
The Company has in place specific policies and programs addressing certain strategic, financial, operational and compliance risks.
Comprehensive reports addressing each of these areas are provided regularly to management and the Board. Controls are in place to
ensure that the Company’s risks are managed effectively and the integrity of its financial reporting is preserved, including:
•
•
•
•
•
an annual budgeting process with at least monthly reporting against performance targets;
Board approved delegated authority limits that set out authority levels for expenditure and commitments for different levels of
management within the Company;
a financial risk management policy, which establishes a risk management framework and procedures for the effective management
of the Company’s financial risks, including management of investment of surplus cash and foreign currency;
a capital approval process that controls the authorisation of capital expenditure and investments; and
a crisis and emergency management system designed to address emergencies at any of the Company’s operating sites.
The Board has received an assurance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that the declaration provided
under s295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is
operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
A summary of the risk policy is on the Company website.
AUDitors
The external auditor attends the annual general meeting and is available to answer shareholder questions about the conduct of the
audit, the preparation and content of the auditor’s report and the independence of the auditor in relation to the conduct of the audit.
Shareholders also have a right to submit written questions to the external auditor (via the Company) in advance of the annual general
meeting, in relation to the contents of the audit report or the conduct of the audit for the relevant year.
etHicAL stANDArDs AND coNDUct
The Company has an Employee Code of Conduct providing a framework of principles for conducting business and dealing with
stakeholders. Employees are required to perform and act with integrity, fairness and in accordance with the law and to avoid real or
apparent conflicts of interest. In addition, the Company has also established a Board Code of Conduct for Directors, which establishes
guidelines for their conduct in carrying out their duties. Copies of both Codes of Conduct are located on the Company’s website.
DiVersitY
The Company wishes to be recognised as an organisation that welcomes diversity and is committed to equality at all levels.
The Company established a diversity policy during the reporting period and this is now published on the Company’s website. The Board
also set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity during the period in accordance with the diversity policy and these are
provided in the table below, together with performance.
The percentage of women employees in the whole organisation is 16%. There are no female members presently on the Board.
Gender diversity targets – measurable objectives
Measurable objective
Target FY2013
Female employees in Mt Gibson
Female employees in executive
and senior management roles
Female members on the Board
20%
10%
1
Actual
16%
21%
0%
Comments
Below target. In line with the mining industry
female participation rate of 17% as reported by
the Workplace Gender Equality Agency
Exceed. Revised target for FY2014 increased
to 20%.
Below. No plans to increase the number of Board
members at the present time.
100
Mount Gibson Iron Limited 2013 Annual Report
Asx ADDitioNAL iNForMAtioN
The following information is required in order to complete the back end of the annual report entitled “ASX and Additional Information”.
The information is current as at 16 September 2013.
(a) Distribution of equity securities
The number of shareholders, by size of holding, in each class of share, are as follows:
1 - 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 - 999,999,999
Total
Number of holders
Number of shares
% of issued capital
Ordinary shares
2,187
5,388
3,001
3,954
298
1,228,052
15,905,942
23,758,301
113,915,902
935,776,035
14,828
1,090,584,232
0.11
1.46
2.18
10.45
85.81
100.00
The number of shareholders holding less
than a marketable parcel of shares are:
1,208
337,730
0.039%
(b) Equity security holders
The names of the 20 largest holders of quoted shares are:
Ordinary shares
Number of shares
% of shares held
True Plus Limited
Sun Hung Kai Investment Services Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above