More annual reports from NXP Semiconductors:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of NXP Semiconductors:
Silicon Motion Technology CorporationTable of ContentsAs filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2015 UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F ¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934OR xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014OR ¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934OR ¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934Date of event requiring this shell company report For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-34841 NXP Semiconductors N.V.(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) The Netherlands(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)High Tech Campus 60, Eindhoven 5656 AG, the Netherlands(Address of principal executive offices)Jean Schreurs, SVP and Senior Corporate Counsel, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, the NetherlandsTelephone: +31 40 2728686 / E-mail: jean.schreurs@nxp.com(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon shares—par value euro (EUR) 0.20 per share The NASDAQ Global Select MarketSecurities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.None(Title of class)Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.Common shares—par value EUR 0.20 per share(Title of class) Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the AnnualReport. Class Outstanding at December 31, 2014Ordinary shares, par value EUR 0.20 per share 251,751,500 sharesIndicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes ¨ NoIf this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨ Yes x NoNote—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934from their obligations under those Sections.Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required tobe submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period thatthe registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer andlarge accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP x International Financial Reporting Standards as issuedby the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ Other ¨If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected tofollow. Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨If this is an Annual Report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the ExchangeAct). ¨ Yes x No Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction Part I Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 2 Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 2 Item 3. Key Information 2 A. Selected Financial Data 2 B. Capitalization and Indebtedness 4 C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds 4 D. Risk Factors 5 Item 4. Information on the Company 18 A. History and Development of the Company 18 B. Business Overview 19 C. Organizational Structure 26 D. Property, Plant and Equipment 28 Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments 28 Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 28 A. Operating Results 28 B. Liquidity and Capital Resources 37 C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. 43 D. Trend Information 43 E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 44 F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations 44 G. Safe Harbor 45 Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 45 A. Directors and Senior Management 45 B. Compensation 48 C. Board Practices 54 D. Employees 56 E. Share Ownership 56 Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 57 A. Major Shareholders 57 B. Related Party Transactions 58 C. Interests of Experts and Counsel 58 Item 8. Financial Information 58 A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information 58 B. Significant Changes 58 Item 9. The Offer and Listing 58 A. Offer and Listing Details 58 B. Plan of Distribution 58 C. Markets 58 D. Selling Shareholders 58 E. Dilution 59 F. Expenses of the Issue 59 Table of Contents Page Item 10. Additional Information 59 A. Share Capital 59 B. Memorandum and Articles of Association 59 C. Material Contracts 59 D. Exchange Controls 59 E. Taxation 59 F. Dividends and Paying Agents 64 G. Statement by Experts 64 H. Documents on Display 64 I. Subsidiary Information 64 Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 64 Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities 65 Part II Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 66 Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds 66 Item 15. Controls and Procedures 66 Item 16. A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 66 B. Code of Ethics 67 C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 67 D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 68 E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 68 F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant 68 G. Corporate Governance 68 H. Mine Safety Disclosures 70 Part III Item 17. Financial Statements 71 Item 18. Financial Statements 71 Item 19. Exhibits 71 GLOSSARY 74 Financial Statements F-1 Table of ContentsIntroductionThis Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that contain risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from futureresults as a result of factors such as those set forth in Part I. Item 3D. Risk Factors and Part I, Item 5G. Safe Harbor.The financial information included in this Annual Report is based on United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), unlessotherwise indicated.In presenting and discussing our financial position, operating results and cash flows, management uses certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures.These non-U.S. GAAP financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as alternatives to the equivalent U.S. GAAP measures and should be used inconjunction with the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures. A discussion of non-U.S. GAAP measures included in this Annual Report and areconciliation of such measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are set forth under “Use of Certain Non-U.S. GAAP FinancialMeasures” contained in this report under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results.Unless otherwise required, all references herein to “we”, “our”, “us”, “NXP” and the “Company” are to NXP Semiconductors N.V. and its consolidatedsubsidiaries.A glossary of abbreviations and technical terms used in this Annual Report is set forth on page 74. 1Table of ContentsPART I Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and AdvisersNot applicable. Item 2.Offer Statistics and Expected TimetableNot applicable. Item 3.Key InformationA. Selected Financial DataThe following table presents a summary of our selected historical consolidated financial data. We prepare our financial statements in accordance withU.S. GAAP.The results of operations for prior years are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. 2Table of ContentsThe selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the discussion under Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results and theConsolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. As of and for the years ended December 31, ($ in millions unless otherwise stated) 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Consolidated Statements of Operations: Revenue 5,647 4,815 4,358 4,194 4,402 Operating income (loss) 1,049 651 412 357 273 Financial income (expense)-net (410) (274) (437) (257) (628) Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to stockholders 539 348 (116) (44) (515) Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to stockholders — — 1 434 59 Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders 539 348 (115) 390 (456) Per share data(1)(2): Basic earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $ - Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.27 1.40 (0.46) (0.17) (2.25) - Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — 1.74 0.26 - Net income (loss) 2.27 1.40 (0.46) 1.57 (1.99) Diluted earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $ - Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.17 1.36 (0.46) (0.17) (2.25) - Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — 1.74 0.26 - Net income (loss) 2.17 1.36 (0.46) 1.57 (1.99) Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year (inthousands) • Basic 237,954 248,526 248,064 248,812 229,280 • Diluted 248,609 255,050 248,064(3) 248,812(3) 229,280(3) Consolidated balance sheet data: Cash and cash equivalents 1,185 670 617 743 898 Total assets 6,893 6,449 6,439 6,612 7,637 Net assets 801 1,546 1,284 1,357 1,219 Working capital(4) 1,340 939 765 969 811 Total debt(5) 3,999 3,321 3,492 3,799 4,551 Total stockholders’ equity 538 1,301 1,049 1,145 986 Common stock 51 51 51 51 51 Other operating data: Capital expenditures (329) (215) (251) (221) (258) Depreciation and amortization(6) 405 514 533 591 684 Consolidated statements of cash flows data: Net cash provided by (used for): Operating activities 1,468 891 722 175 361 Investing activities (387) (240) (243) (202) (269) Financing activities (554) (598) (574) (926) (157) Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations 527 53 (95) (953) (65) Net cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations — — (45) 809 (5) (1)In 2010, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split, decreasing the number of shares of common stockoutstanding from approximately 4.3 billion to approximately 215 million and increasing the par value of the shares of common stock from €0.01 to€0.20. In all periods presented, basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding and earnings per share have been calculated to reflect the 1-for-20 reverse stock split.(2)The Company has not paid any dividends during the periods presented.(3)Due to our net losses from continuing operations attributable to stockholders in the periods from 2010 to 2012, all potentially dilutive securities havebeen excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.(4)Working capital is calculated as current assets less current liabilities (excluding short-term debt). 3Table of Contents(5)As adjusted for our cash and cash equivalents our net debt was calculated as follows: ($ in millions) 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Long-term debt 3,979 3,281 3,185 3,747 4,128 Short-term debt 20 40 307 52 423 Total debt 3,999 3,321 3,492 3,799 4,551 Less: cash and cash equivalents (1,185) (670) (617) (743) (898) Net debt 2,814 2,651 2,875 3,056 3,653 Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures” under Part I, 5A. Operating Results. (6)Depreciation and amortization includes the cumulative net effect of purchase price adjustments related to a number of acquisitions and divestments,including the purchase by a consortium of private equity investors of an 80.1% interest in our business, described elsewhere in this Annual Report asour “Formation.” The cumulative net effects of purchase price adjustments in depreciation and amortization aggregated to $164 million in 2014, $246million in 2013, $273 million in 2012, $301 million in 2011 and $302 million in 2010. In 2014, depreciation and amortization included $1 million(2013: $9 million; 2012: $2 million; 2011: $5 million and 2010: $40 million) related to disposals that occurred in connection with our restructuringactivities and $1 million (2013: $3 million; 2012: $2 million; 2011: $1 million and 2010: $6 million) relating to other incidental items. For a detailedlist of the acquisitions and a discussion of the effect of acquisition accounting, see the “Effect of Acquisition Accounting” section in Part I, Item 5 A.Operating Results. Depreciation and amortization also includes impairments to goodwill and other intangibles, as well as write-offs in connection withacquired in-process research and development, if any.As used in this Annual Report, “euro”, or “€” means the single unified currency of the European Monetary Union. “U.S. dollar”, “USD”, “U.S. $” or “$”means the lawful currency of the United States of America. As used in this Annual Report, the term “noon buying rate” refers to the exchange rate for euro,expressed in U.S. dollars per euro, as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes as the rate in the city of New York for cabletransfers in foreign currencies.The table below shows the average noon buying rates for U.S. dollars per euro for the five years ended December 31, 2014. The averages set forth in thetable below have been computed using the noon buying rate on the last business day of each month during the periods indicated. Year ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Average $ per € 1.3297 1.3281 1.2859 1.3931 1.3261 The following table shows the high and low noon buying rates for U.S. dollars per euro for each of the six months in the six-month period endedFebruary 20, 2015: Month High Low ($ per €) 2014 August 1.3436 1.3150 September 1.3136 1.2628 October 1.2812 1.2517 November 1.2554 1.2394 December 1.2504 1.2101 2015 January 1.2015 1.1279 On February 20, 2015, the noon buying rate was $1.1372 per €1.00.Fluctuations in the value of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar have had a significant effect on the translation into U.S. dollar of our euro-denominatedassets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and may continue to do so in the future. For further information on the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates onour operations, see the “Fluctuations in Foreign Rates May Have An Adverse Effect On Our Financial Results” section in Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors andthe “Foreign Currency Risks” section in Part I, Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.B. Capitalization and IndebtednessNot applicable.C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of ProceedsNot applicable. 4Table of ContentsD. Risk FactorsThe following section provides an overview of the risks to which our business is exposed. You should carefully consider the risk factors describedbelow and all other information contained in this Annual Report, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. The occurrence of therisks described below could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Various statements in this AnnualReport, including the following risk factors, contain forward-looking statements. Please also refer to Part I, Item 5G. Safe Harbor, contained elsewhere inthis Annual Report.Risks related to our businessThe semiconductor industry is highly cyclical.Historically, the relationship between supply and demand in the semiconductor industry has caused a high degree of cyclicality in the semiconductormarket. Semiconductor supply is partly driven by manufacturing capacity, which in the past has demonstrated alternating periods of substantial capacityadditions and periods in which no or limited capacity was added. As a general matter, semiconductor companies are more likely to add capacity in periodswhen current or expected future demand is strong and margins are, or are expected to be, high. Investments in new capacity can result in overcapacity, whichcan lead to a reduction in prices and margins. In response, companies typically limit further capacity additions, eventually causing the market to be relativelyundersupplied. In addition, demand for semiconductors varies, which can exacerbate the effect of supply fluctuations. As a result of this cyclicality, thesemiconductor industry has in the past experienced significant downturns, such as in 1997/1998, 2001/2002 and in 2008/2009, often in connection with, orin anticipation of, maturing life cycles of semiconductor companies’ products and declines in general economic conditions. These downturns have beencharacterized by diminishing demand for end-user products, high inventory levels, under-utilization of manufacturing capacity and accelerated erosion ofaverage selling prices. The foregoing risks have historically had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition andresults of operations.Significantly increased volatility and instability and unfavorable economic conditions may adversely affect our business.In 2008 and 2009, Europe, the United States and international markets experienced increased volatility and instability. In 2014, volatility andinstability in financial markets continued following renewed investor concerns related to the economic situation in parts of the world, increased hostilities inthe Middle East, increased conflict between the Ukraine and Russia and other world events. These, or other events, could further adversely affect theeconomies of the European Union, the United States and those of other countries and may exacerbate the cyclicality of our business. Among other factors, weface risks attendant to declines in general economic conditions, changes in demand for end-user products and changes in interest rates.Despite indications of recovery and aggressive measures taken by governments and central banks, there is a significant risk that the global economycould fall into recession again. If economic conditions remain uncertain or deteriorate, our business, financial condition and results of operations could bematerially adversely affected.As a consequence of the significantly increased volatility and instability, it is difficult for us, our customers and suppliers to forecast demand trends.We may be unable to accurately predict the extent or duration of cycles or their effect on our financial condition or result of operations and can give noassurance as to the timing, extent or duration of the current or future business cycles. A recurrent decline in demand or the failure of demand to return to priorlevels could place pressure on our results of operations. The timing and extent of any changes to currently prevailing market conditions is uncertain andsupply and demand may be unbalanced at any time.The semiconductor industry is highly competitive. If we fail to introduce new technologies and products in a timely manner, this could adverselyaffect our business.The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and characterized by constant and rapid technological change, short product lifecycles, significantprice erosion and evolving standards. Accordingly, the success of our business depends to a significant extent on our ability to develop new technologiesand products that are ultimately successful in the market. The costs related to the research and development necessary to develop new technologies andproducts are significant and any reduction of our research and development budget could harm our competitiveness. Meeting evolving industry requirementsand introducing new products to the market in a timely manner and at prices that are acceptable to our customers are significant factors in determining ourcompetitiveness and success. Commitments to develop new products must be made well in advance of any resulting sales, and technologies and standardsmay change during development, potentially rendering our products outdated or uncompetitive before their introduction. If we are unable to successfullydevelop new products, our revenue may decline substantially. Moreover, some of our competitors are well-established entities, are larger than us and havegreater resources than we do. If these competitors increase the resources they devote to developing and marketing their products, we may not be able tocompete effectively. Any consolidation among our competitors could enhance their product offerings and financial resources, further strengthening theircompetitive position. In addition, some of our competitors operate in narrow business areas relative to us, allowing them to concentrate their research anddevelopment efforts directly on products and services for those areas, which may give them a competitive advantage. As a result of these competitivepressures, we may face declining sales volumes or lower prevailing prices for our products, and we 5Table of Contentsmay not be able to reduce our total costs in line with this declining revenue. If any of these risks materialize, they could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial condition and results of operations.In many of the market segments in which we compete, we depend on winning selection processes, and failure to be selected could adversely affect ourbusiness in those market segments.One of our business strategies is to participate in and win competitive bid selection processes to develop products for use in our customers’ equipmentand products. These selection processes can be lengthy and require us to incur significant design and development expenditures, with no guarantee ofwinning a contract or generating revenue. Failure to win new design projects and delays in developing new products with anticipated technological advancesor in commencing volume shipments of these products may have an adverse effect on our business. This risk is particularly pronounced in markets wherethere are only a few potential customers and in the automotive market, where, due to the longer design cycles involved, failure to win a design-in couldprevent access to a customer for several years. Our failure to win a sufficient number of these bids could result in reduced revenue and hurt our competitiveposition in future selection processes because we may not be perceived as being a technology or industry leader, each of which could have a material adverseeffect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.The demand for our products depends to a significant degree on the demand for our customers’ end products.The vast majority of our revenue is derived from sales to manufacturers in the automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial,mobile, consumer and computing markets. Demand in these markets fluctuates significantly, driven by consumer spending, consumer preferences, thedevelopment of new technologies and prevailing economic conditions. In addition, the specific products in which our semiconductors are incorporated maynot be successful, or may experience price erosion or other competitive factors that affect the price manufacturers are willing to pay us. Such customers havein the past, and may in the future, vary order levels significantly from period to period, request postponements to scheduled delivery dates, modify theirorders or reduce lead times. This is particularly common during periods of low demand. This can make managing our business difficult, as it limits thepredictability of future revenue. It can also affect the accuracy of our financial forecasts. Furthermore, developing industry trends, including customers’ use ofoutsourcing and new and revised supply chain models, may affect our revenue, costs and working capital requirements. Additionally, a significant portion ofour products is made to order.If customers do not purchase products made specifically for them, we may not be able to resell such products to other customers or may not be able torequire the customers who have ordered these products to pay a cancellation fee. The foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial condition and results of operations.The semiconductor industry is characterized by significant price erosion, especially after a product has been on the market for a significant period oftime.One of the results of the rapid innovation in the semiconductor industry is that pricing pressure, especially on products containing older technology,can be intense. Product life cycles are relatively short, and as a result, products tend to be replaced by more technologically advanced substitutes on a regularbasis.In turn, demand for older technology falls, causing the price at which such products can be sold to drop, in some cases precipitously. In order tocontinue profitably supplying these products, we must reduce our production costs in line with the lower revenue we can expect to generate per unit. Usually,this must be accomplished through improvements in process technology and production efficiencies. If we cannot advance our process technologies orimprove our efficiencies to a degree sufficient to maintain required margins, we will no longer be able to make a profit from the sale of these products.Moreover, we may not be able to cease production of such products, either due to contractual obligations or for customer relationship reasons, and as a resultmay be required to bear a loss on such products. We cannot guarantee that competition in our core product markets will not lead to price erosion, lowerrevenue or lower margins in the future. Should reductions in our manufacturing costs fail to keep pace with reductions in market prices for the products wesell, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets represent a significant portion of our total assets, and we may never realize the full value of ourintangible assets.Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. We review our goodwill and other intangibleassets balance for impairment upon any indication of a potential impairment, and in the case of goodwill, at a minimum of once a year. Impairment may resultfrom, among other things, deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes thatrestrict the activities of or affect the products and services we sell, challenges to the validity of certain registered intellectual property, reduced sales of certainproducts incorporating registered intellectual property and a variety of other factors. The amount of any quantified impairment must be expensedimmediately as a charge to results of operations. Depending on future circumstances, it is possible that we may never realize the full value of our intangibleassets. Any future determination of impairment of goodwill or other identifiable intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our financialposition, results of operations and stockholders’ equity. 6Table of ContentsAs our business is global, we need to comply with laws and regulations in countries across the world and are exposed to international business risksthat could adversely affect our business.We operate globally, with manufacturing, assembly and testing facilities in several continents, and we market our products globally.As a result, we are subject to environmental, labor and health and safety laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we operate. We are alsorequired to obtain environmental permits and other authorizations or licenses from governmental authorities for certain of our operations and have to protectour intellectual property worldwide. In the jurisdictions where we operate, we need to comply with differing standards and varying practices of regulatory,tax, judicial and administrative bodies.In addition, the business environment is also subject to many economic and political uncertainties, including the following international businessrisks: • negative economic developments in economies around the world and the instability of governments, such as the sovereign debt crisis in certainEuropean countries; • social and political instability in a number of countries around the world, including continued hostilities and civil unrest in the Middle East.Although we have no direct investments in North Africa and the Middle East, the ongoing changes may have, for instance via our customers, theenergy prices and the financial markets, a negative effect on our business, financial condition and operations; • potential terrorist attacks; • epidemics and pandemics, which may adversely affect our workforce, as well as our local suppliers and customers in particular in Asia; • adverse changes in governmental policies, especially those affecting trade and investment; • our customers or other groups of stakeholders might impose requirements that are more stringent than the laws in the countries in which we areactive; • volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, in particular with respect to the U.S. dollar, and transfer restrictions, in particular in Greater China;and • threats that our operations or property could be subject to nationalization and expropriation.No assurance can be given that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with the laws and regulations to which we are subject orthat we have obtained or will obtain the permits and other authorizations or licenses that we need. If we violate or fail to comply with laws, regulations,permits and other authorizations or licenses, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In this case, or if any of the international business riskswere to materialize or become worse, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for publiccompanies, further increasing legal and financial compliance costs. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in manycases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory andgoverning bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure.Interruptions in our information technology systems could adversely affect our business.We rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of complex information technology applications, systems and networks to operate our business.Any significant interruption in our business applications, systems or networks, including but not limited to new system implementations, computer viruses,cyber attacks, security breaches, facility issues or energy blackouts could have a material adverse impact on our operations, sales and operating results. Inrecent years, the risks that we and other companies face from cyber attacks have increased significantly. Given the nature of some of our products theseattacks may originate from well organized, highly skilled and highly funded organizations. Any such attack or system or network disruption could result in aloss of our intellectual property, the release of commercially sensitive information or partner, customer or employee personal data, disruption of the supplychain towards our customers, or the loss of production capabilities at one of our manufacturing sites. Therefore, any such severe incident could harm ourcompetitive position, result in a loss of customer confidence, and cause us to incur significant costs to remedy the damages caused by the system or networkdisruptions, whether caused by cyber attacks, security breaches or otherwise. The protective measures that we are adopting to avoid system or networkdisruptions may, especially given the potential professionalism of the intruders, be insufficient to prevent or limit the damage from any future disruptions andany disruption could have a material adverse impact on our business, operations and financial results. Although we have experienced cyber attacks, to datewe have not incurred any significant damage as a result. There can be no assurance that our controls will be adequate to avoid damages from cyber attacks. 7Table of ContentsIn difficult market conditions, our high fixed costs combined with low revenue negatively affect our results of operations.The semiconductor industry is characterized by high fixed costs and, notwithstanding our utilization of third-party manufacturing capacity, most ofour production requirements are met by our own manufacturing facilities. In less favorable industry environments, like we faced in the second half in 2011,we are generally faced with a decline in the utilization rates of our manufacturing facilities due to decreases in demand for our products. During such periods,our fabrication plants could operate at lower loading level, while the fixed costs associated with the full capacity continue to be incurred, resulting in lowergross profit.The semiconductor industry is capital intensive and if we are unable to invest the necessary capital to operate and grow our business, we may notremain competitive.To remain competitive, we must constantly improve our facilities and process technologies and carry out extensive research and development, each ofwhich requires investment of significant amounts of capital. This risk is magnified by the indebtedness we currently have, since we are required to use aportion of our cash flow to service that debt. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or raise sufficient capital to meet both our debt service andcapital investment requirements, or if we are unable to raise required capital on favorable terms when needed, this could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial condition and results of operations.We rely to a significant extent on proprietary intellectual property. We may not be able to protect this intellectual property against improper use byour competitors or others.We depend significantly on patents and other intellectual property rights to protect our products and proprietary design and fabrication processesagainst misappropriation by others. We may in the future have difficulty obtaining patents and other intellectual property rights, and the patents we receivemay be insufficient to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantage. We may not be able to obtain patent protection or secure otherintellectual property rights in all the countries in which we operate, and under the laws of such countries, patents and other intellectual property rights maybe or become unavailable or limited in scope. The protection offered by intellectual property rights may be inadequate or weakened for reasons orcircumstances that are out of our control. Further, our trade secrets may be vulnerable to disclosure or misappropriation by employees, contractors and otherpersons. In particular, intellectual property rights are difficult to enforce in some countries, since the application and enforcement of the laws governing suchrights may not have reached the same level as compared to other jurisdictions where we operate, such as the United States, Germany and the Netherlands.Consequently, operating in some of these countries may subject us to an increased risk that unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use ourintellectual property or the intellectual property of our suppliers or other parties with whom we engage. There is no assurance that we will be able to protectour intellectual property rights or have adequate legal recourse in the event that we seek legal or judicial enforcement of our intellectual property rightsunder the laws of such countries. Any inability on our part to adequately protect our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our business,financial condition and results of operations.The intellectual property that was transferred or licensed to us from Philips may not be sufficient to protect our position in the industry.In connection with our separation from Philips in 2006, Philips transferred patents to us subject to certain limitations, including (1) any priorcommitments to and undertakings with third parties entered into prior to the separation and (2) certain licenses retained by Philips. The licenses retained byPhilips give Philips the right to sublicense to third parties in certain circumstances, which may divert revenue opportunities from us. In the meantime, severaldivestitures, including the divestment of our wireless operations to ST-NXP Wireless in 2008, the divestment of our television systems and set-top boxbusiness lines to Trident in 2010, and the sale of our Sound Solutions business to Knowles Electronics in 2011 has led to the transfer of certain patents tothird parties.Philips granted us a non-exclusive license to: (1) all patents Philips holds but has not assigned to us, to the extent that they are entitled to the benefit ofa filing date prior to the separation and for which Philips is free to grant licenses without the consent of or accounting to any third party and (2) certain know-how that is available to us, where such patents and know-how relate to: (i) our current products and technologies, as well as successor products andtechnologies, (ii) technology that was developed for us prior to the separation and (iii) technology developed pursuant to contract research co-funded by us.Philips has also granted us a non-exclusive royalty-free and irrevocable license under: (1) certain patents for use in giant magneto-resistive devices outsidethe field of healthcare and bio applications, and (2) certain patents relevant to polymer electronics resulting from contract research work co-funded by us inthe field of radio frequency identification tags. Such licenses are subject to certain prior commitments and undertakings. However, Philips retained ownershipof certain intellectual property related to our business, as well as certain rights with respect to intellectual property transferred to us in connection with theseparation. There can be no guarantee that the patents transferred to us will be sufficient to assert offensively against our competitors, to be used as leverageto negotiate future cross-licenses or to give us freedom to operate and innovate in the industry. The strength and value of our intellectual property may bediluted if Philips licenses or otherwise transfers such intellectual property or such rights to third parties, especially if those third parties compete with us. Theforegoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 8Table of ContentsWe may become party to intellectual property claims or litigation that could cause us to incur substantial costs, pay substantial damages or prohibitus from selling our products.We have from time to time received, and may in the future receive, communications alleging possible infringement of patents and other intellectualproperty rights of others. Further, we may become involved in costly litigation brought against us regarding patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets orother intellectual property rights. If any such claims are asserted against us, we may seek to obtain a license under the third party’s intellectual propertyrights. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any or all of the necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all. In the event that we cannotobtain or take the view that we don’t need a license, these parties may file lawsuits against us seeking damages (and potentially treble damages in the UnitedStates) or an injunction against the sale of our products that incorporate allegedly infringed intellectual property or against the operation of our business aspresently conducted. Such lawsuits, if successful, could result in an increase in the costs of selling certain of our products, our having to partially orcompletely redesign our products or stop the sale of some of our products and could cause damage to our reputation. Any litigation could require significantfinancial and management resources regardless of the merits or outcome, and we cannot assure you that we would prevail in any litigation or that ourintellectual property rights can be successfully asserted in the future or will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. The award of damages, includingmaterial royalty payments, or the entry of an injunction against the manufacture and sale of some or all of our products, could affect our ability to compete orhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.We rely on strategic partnerships, joint ventures and alliances for manufacturing and research and development. However, we often do not controlthese partnerships and joint ventures, and actions taken by any of our partners or the termination of these partnerships or joint ventures could adverselyaffect our business.As part of our strategy, we have entered into a number of long-term strategic partnerships with other leading industry participants. For example, wehave entered into a joint venture with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (“TSMC”) called Systems on Silicon ManufacturingCompany Pte. Ltd. (“SSMC”). We established Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation Limited (“ASMC”) together with a number of Chinesepartners, and together with Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. (“ASE”), we established the assembly and test joint venture ASEN SemiconductorsCo. Ltd. (“ASEN”).If any of our strategic partners in industry groups or in any of the other alliances we engage with were to encounter financial difficulties or change theirbusiness strategies, they may no longer be able or willing to participate in these groups or alliances, which could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial condition and results of operations. We do not control some of these strategic partnerships, joint ventures and alliances in which weparticipate. We may also have certain obligations, including some limited funding obligations or take or pay obligations, with regard to some of our strategicpartnerships, joint ventures and alliances. For example, we have made certain commitments to SSMC, in which we have a 61.2% ownership share, wherebywe are obligated to make cash payments to SSMC should we fail to utilize, and TSMC does not utilize, an agreed upon percentage of the total availablecapacity at SSMC’s fabrication facilities if overall SSMC utilization levels drop below a fixed proportion of the total available capacity.The Merger with Freescale may not be consummated.On March 1, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) providing for the merger of Nimble AcquisitionLimited (“Sub”) with and into Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. (“Freescale”), with Freescale surviving the merger as a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary ofNXP (the “Merger”). The Merger Agreement provides that the consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions. If the Merger is notconsummated, this could cause serious disruptions to our business, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results ofoperations. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights and obligations, including payment of termination fees, for the Companyand Freescale.We entered into the Merger Agreement with Freescale and may continue to make other acquisitions and engage in other transactions to complementor expand our existing businesses. However, we may not be successful in acquiring other suitable targets or we may not be successful in integratingFreescale or any such other target into our operations. Any acquisitions we make may lead to a diversion of management resources.Our future success may depend on acquiring businesses and technologies, making investments or forming joint ventures that complement, enhance orexpand our current portfolio or otherwise offer us growth opportunities. On March 2, 2015, we announced our intent to merge with Freescale, however, as ofthe date hereof, we have not obtained any of the conditions to which the Merger is subject. In addition, in pursuing acquisitions, including the Merger withFreescale, we may face competition from other companies in the semiconductor industry. Our ability to consummate the Merger Agreement we entered intowith Freescale or to acquire other targets may also be limited by applicable antitrust laws and other regulations in the United States, the European Union andother jurisdictions in which we do business. To the extent that we are successful in consummating the Merger Agreement we entered into with Freescale ormaking other acquisitions, we may have to expend substantial amounts of cash, incur debt, assume loss-making divisions and incur other types of expenses.We may also face challenges in successfully integrating Freescale or any such other acquired companies into our existing organization or in creating theanticipated cost synergies. Each of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 9Table of ContentsWe may from time to time desire to exit certain product lines or businesses, or to restructure our operations, but may not be successful in doing so.From time to time, we may decide to divest certain product lines and businesses or restructure our operations, including through the contribution ofassets to joint ventures. We have, in recent years, exited several of our product lines and businesses, and we have closed several of our manufacturing andresearch facilities. We may continue to do so in the future. However, our ability to successfully exit product lines and businesses, or to close or consolidateoperations, depends on a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. For example, if we are seeking a buyer for a particular business line,none may be available, or we may not be successful in negotiating satisfactory terms with prospective buyers. In addition, we may face internal obstacles toour efforts. In particular, several of our operations and facilities are subject to collective bargaining agreements and social plans or require us to consult withour employee representatives, such as work councils which may prevent or complicate our efforts to sell or restructure our businesses. In some cases,particularly with respect to our European operations, there may be laws or other legal impediments affecting our ability to carry out such sales orrestructuring.If we are unable to exit a product line or business in a timely manner, or to restructure our operations in a manner we deem to be advantageous, thiscould have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if a divestment is successful, we may face indemnityand other liability claims by the acquirer or other parties.We may from time to time restructure parts of our processes. Any such restructuring may impact customer satisfaction and the costs ofimplementation may be difficult to predict.Between 2008 and 2011, we executed our redesign program (the “Redesign Program”) and in 2013 we executed a restructuring initiative designed toimprove operational efficiency and to competitively position the company for sustainable growth (the “OPEX Reduction Program”). We plan to continue torestructure and make changes to parts of the processes in our organization. Furthermore, if the global economy remains as volatile or unstable or if the globaleconomy reenters into a deeper and longer lasting recession, our revenues could decline, and we may be forced to take additional cost savings steps thatcould result in additional charges and materially affect our business. The costs of implementing any restructurings, changes or cost savings steps may differfrom our estimates and any negative impacts on our revenues or otherwise of such restructurings, changes or steps, such as situations in which customersatisfaction is negatively impacted, may be larger than originally estimated.If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements and social plans with our labor unions as they expire from time to time, ifregular or statutory consultation processes with employee representatives such as works councils fail or are delayed, or if our unionized employees were toengage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially harmed.We are a party to collective bargaining agreements and social plans with our labor unions. We are also required to consult with our employeerepresentatives, such as works councils, on items such as restructurings, acquisitions and divestitures. Although we believe that our relations with ouremployees, employee representatives and unions are satisfactory, no assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully extend or renegotiate theseagreements as they expire from time to time or to conclude the consultation processes in a timely and favorable way. The impact of future negotiations andconsultation processes with employee representatives could have a material impact on our financial results. Also, if we fail to extend or renegotiate our laboragreements and social plans, if significant disputes with our unions arise, or if our unionized workers engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we couldincur higher ongoing labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.Our working capital needs are difficult to predict.Our working capital needs are difficult to predict and may fluctuate. The comparatively long period between the time at which we commencedevelopment of a product and the time at which it may be delivered to a customer leads to high inventory and work-in-progress levels. The volatility of ourcustomers’ own businesses and the time required to manufacture products also makes it difficult to manage inventory levels and requires us to stockpileproducts across many different specifications.Our business may be adversely affected by costs relating to product defects, and we could be faced with product liability and warranty claims.We make highly complex electronic components and, accordingly, there is a risk that defects may occur in any of our products. Such defects can giverise to significant costs, including expenses relating to recalling products, replacing defective items, writing down defective inventory and loss of potentialsales. In addition, the occurrence of such defects may give rise to product liability and warranty claims, including liability for damages caused by suchdefects. If we release defective products into the market, our reputation could suffer and we may lose sales opportunities and incur liability for damages.Moreover, since the cost of replacing defective semiconductor devices is often much higher than the value of the devices themselves, we may at times facedamage claims from customers in excess of the amounts they pay us for our products, including consequential damages. We also face exposure to potentialliability resulting from the fact that our customers typically integrate the semiconductors we sell into numerous consumer products, which are then sold intothe marketplace. We are exposed to product liability claims if our semiconductors or the consumer 10Table of Contentsproducts based on them malfunction and result in personal injury or death. We may be named in product liability claims even if there is no evidence that ourproducts caused the damage in question, and such claims could result in significant costs and expenses relating to attorneys’ fees and damages. In addition,our customers may recall their products if they prove to be defective or make compensatory payments in accordance with industry or business practice or inorder to maintain good customer relationships. If such a recall or payment is caused by a defect in one of our products, our customers may seek to recover allor a portion of their losses from us. If any of these risks materialize, our reputation would be harmed and there could be a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial condition and results of operations.Our business has suffered, and could in the future suffer, from manufacturing problems.We manufacture, in our own factories as well as with third parties, our products using processes that are highly complex, require advanced and costlyequipment and must continuously be modified to improve yields and performance. Difficulties in the production process can reduce yields or interruptproduction, and, as a result of such problems, we may on occasion not be able to deliver products or do so in a timely or cost-effective or competitive manner.As the complexity of both our products and our fabrication processes has become more advanced, manufacturing tolerances have been reduced andrequirements for precision have become more demanding. As is common in the semiconductor industry, we have in the past experienced manufacturingdifficulties that have given rise to delays in delivery and quality control problems. There can be no assurance that any such occurrence in the future wouldnot materially harm our results of operations. Further, we may suffer disruptions in our manufacturing operations, either due to production difficulties such asthose described above or as a result of external factors beyond our control. We may, in the future, experience manufacturing difficulties or permanent ortemporary loss of manufacturing capacity due to the preceding or other risks. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financialcondition and results of operations.We rely on the timely supply of equipment and materials and could suffer if suppliers fail to meet their delivery obligations or raise prices. Certainequipment and materials needed in our manufacturing operations are only available from a limited number of suppliers.Our manufacturing operations depend on deliveries of equipment and materials in a timely manner and, in some cases, on a just-in-time basis. Fromtime to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit the amounts supplied to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. Supplydisruptions may also occur due to shortages in critical materials, such as silicon wafers or specialized chemicals. Because the equipment that we purchase iscomplex, it is frequently difficult or impossible for us to substitute one piece of equipment for another or replace one type of material with another. A failureby our suppliers to deliver our requirements could result in disruptions to our manufacturing operations. Our business, financial condition and results ofoperations could be harmed if we are unable to obtain adequate supplies of quality equipment or materials in a timely manner or if there are significantincreases in the costs of equipment or materials.Failure of our third party suppliers to perform could adversely affect our ability to exploit growth opportunities.We currently use outside suppliers for a portion of our manufacturing capacity. Outsourcing our production presents a number of risks. If our outsidesuppliers are unable to satisfy our demand, or experience manufacturing difficulties, delays or reduced yields, our results of operations and ability to satisfycustomer demand could suffer. In addition, purchasing rather than manufacturing these products may adversely affect our gross profit margin if the purchasecosts of these products are higher than our own manufacturing costs would have been. Prices for foundry products also vary depending on capacityutilization rates at our suppliers, quantities demanded, product technology and geometry. Furthermore, these outsourcing costs can vary materially fromquarter to quarter and, in cases of industry shortages, they can increase significantly, negatively affecting our gross profit.Loss of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to attract such management and other personnel, could affect our business.We depend on our key management to run our business and on our senior engineers to develop new products and technologies. Our success willdepend on the continued service of these individuals. Although we have several share based compensation plans in place, we cannot be sure that these planswill help us in our ability to retain key personnel, especially considering the fact that the stock options under some of our plans become exercisable upon achange of control (in particular, when a third party, or third parties acting in concert, obtains, whether directly or indirectly, control of us). The loss of any ofour key personnel, whether due to departures, death, ill health or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business. The market for qualifiedemployees, including skilled engineers and other individuals with the required technical expertise to succeed in our business, is highly competitive and theloss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate the additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion ofour business could hinder our ability to successfully conduct research activities or develop marketable products. The foregoing risks could have a materialadverse effect on our business. 11Table of ContentsDisruptions in our relationships with any one of our key customers could adversely affect our business.A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from our top customers, including our distributors. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to generatesimilar levels of revenue from our largest customers in the future. If one or more of these customers substantially reduce their purchases from us, this couldhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.We receive subsidies and grants in certain countries, and a reduction in the amount of governmental funding available to us or demands forrepayment could increase our costs and affect our results of operations.As is the case with other large semiconductor companies, we receive subsidies and grants from governments in some countries. These programs aresubject to periodic review by the relevant governments, and if any of these programs are curtailed or discontinued, this could have a material adverse effecton our business, financial condition and results of operations. As the availability of government funding is outside our control, we cannot guarantee that wewill continue to benefit from government support or that sufficient alternative funding will be available if we lose such support. Moreover, if we terminateany activities or operations, including strategic alliances or joint ventures, we may face adverse actions from the local governmental agencies providing suchsubsidies to us. In particular, such government agencies could seek to recover such subsidies from us and they could cancel or reduce other subsidies wereceive from them. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.Legal proceedings covering a range of matters are pending in various jurisdictions. Due to the uncertainty inherent in litigation, it is difficult topredict the final outcome. An adverse outcome might affect our results of operations.We and certain of our businesses are involved as plaintiffs or defendants in legal proceedings in various matters. Although the ultimate disposition ofasserted claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, our financial position and results of operations could be affected by an adverse outcome.We are exposed to a variety of financial risks, including currency risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, commodity price risk, credit risk and othernon-insured risks, which may have an adverse effect on our financial results.We are a global company and, as a direct consequence, movements in the financial markets may impact our financial results. We are exposed to avariety of financial risks, including currency fluctuations, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, commodity price risk and credit risk and other non-insured risks.We have euro-denominated assets and liabilities and, since our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, the impact of currency translation adjustments to suchassets and liabilities may have a negative effect on our stockholders’ equity. We continue to hold or convert a part of our cash in euros as a hedge for euroexpenses and euro interest payments. We are exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates when we convert U.S. dollars to euro. We enter into diverse financialtransactions with several counterparties to mitigate our currency risk. We only use derivative instruments for hedging purposes. The U.S. dollar-denominateddebt issued by us and our subsidiary, NXP B.V., with functional currency euro may generate adverse currency results in our financial income and expenses.Part of this effect is mitigated due to the application of net investment hedge accounting, since May 2011, pursuant to which the currency results on (part of)the U.S. dollar-denominated debt is reported as part of other comprehensive income within equity instead of financial income and expense in theConsolidated Statements of Operations. Absent the application of net investment hedge accounting, we would have recorded an additional charge of $214million, before tax, within financial income and expense in the 2014 statement of operations. The rating of our debt by major rating agencies may furtherimprove or deteriorate, which could affect our additional borrowing capacity and financing costs.We are also a purchaser of certain base metals, precious metals, chemicals and energy used in the manufacturing process of our products, the prices ofwhich can be volatile. Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform upon their agreedpayment obligations. Credit risk is present within our trade receivables. Such exposure is reduced through ongoing credit evaluations of the financialconditions of our customers and by adjusting payment terms and credit limits when appropriate. We invest available cash and cash equivalents with variousfinancial institutions and are in that respect exposed to credit risk with these counterparties. We actively manage concentration risk on a daily basis adheringto a treasury management policy. We seek to limit the financial institutions with which we enter into financial transactions, such as depositing cash, to thosewith a strong credit rating wherever possible. If we are unable to successfully manage these risks, they could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial condition and results of operations. 12Table of ContentsThe impact of a negative performance of financial markets and demographic trends on our defined benefit pension liabilities and costs cannot bepredicted.We sponsor defined benefit pension plans in a number of countries and a significant number of our employees are covered by our defined benefitpension plans. As of December 31, 2014, we had recognized a net accrued benefit liability of $290 million, representing the unfunded benefit obligations ofour defined pension plans. The funding status and the liabilities and costs of maintaining these defined benefit pension plans may be impacted by financialmarket developments. For example, the accounting for such plans requires determining discount rates, expected rates of compensation and expected returnson plan assets, and any changes in these variables can have a significant impact on the projected benefit obligations and net periodic pension costs. Negativeperformance of the financial markets could also have a material impact on funding requirements and net periodic pension costs. Our defined benefit pensionplans may also be subject to demographic trends. Accordingly, our costs to meet pension liabilities going forward may be significantly higher than they aretoday, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.Changes in the tax deductibility of interest may adversely affect our financial position and our ability to service the obligations under ourindebtedness.Effective January 1, 2013 certain new limitations apply to the tax deductibility of interest expense in the Netherlands. A Dutch company that isconsidered to be financed with excessive debt, may not be entitled to deduct interest expense on such excessive debt. Existing debt is not grandfatheredunder these rules. The measurement of whether there is excessive debt is based on arithmetic tests based on the amount of equity of the company in relationto the acquisition cost of and capital invested in the Netherlands and foreign subsidiaries of the Netherlands consolidated group. When the equity of thecompany is below a certain minimum threshold, the company may be considered to have excessive debt. Certain safe harbor rules apply when newoperational businesses are acquired by the company. Despite this was not the case in 2014 and is not expected for 2015, the application of this limitation ontax deductibility of interest expense may adversely affect our financial position and our ability to service the obligations under our indebtedness.We are exposed to a number of different tax uncertainties, which could have an impact on tax results.We are required to pay taxes in multiple jurisdictions. We determine the taxes we are required to pay based on our interpretation of the applicable taxlaws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We may be subject to unfavorable changes in the respective tax laws and regulations to whichwe are subject. Tax controls, audits, change in controls and changes in tax laws or regulations or the interpretation given to them may expose us to negativetax consequences, including interest payments and potentially penalties. We have issued transfer-pricing directives in the areas of goods, services andfinancing, which are in accordance with the Guidelines of the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). As transfer pricing has across border effect, the focus of local tax authorities on implemented transfer pricing procedures in a country may have an impact on results in anothercountry.Transfer pricing uncertainties can also result from disputes with local tax authorities about transfer pricing of internal deliveries of goods and servicesor related to financing, acquisitions and divestments, the use of tax credits and permanent establishments, and tax losses carried forward. These uncertaintiesmay have a significant impact on local tax results. We also have various tax assets resulting from acquisitions. Tax assets can also result from the generationof tax losses in certain legal entities. Tax authorities may challenge these tax assets. In addition, the value of the tax assets resulting from tax losses carriedforward depends on having sufficient taxable profits in the future.There may from time to time exist deficiencies in our internal control systems that could adversely affect the accuracy and reliability of our periodicreporting.We are required to establish and periodically assess the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Despite thecompliance procedures that we have adopted to ensure internal control over financial controls, there may from time to time exist deficiencies in our internalcontrol systems that could adversely affect the accuracy and reliability of our periodic reporting. Our periodic reporting is the basis of investors’ and othermarket professionals’ understanding of our businesses. Imperfections in our periodic reporting could create uncertainty regarding the reliability of our resultsof operations and financial results, which in turn could have a material adverse impact on our reputation or share price.Environmental laws and regulations expose us to liability and compliance with these laws and regulations, and any such liability may adverselyaffect our business.We are subject to many environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we operate, which govern, among otherthings, emissions of pollutants into the air, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of hazardous substances, waste disposal, the investigation andremediation of soil and ground water contamination and the health and safety of our employees. We are also required to obtain environmental permits fromgovernmental authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws,regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. 13Table of ContentsAs with other companies engaged in similar activities or that own or operate real property, we face inherent risks of environmental liability at ourcurrent and historical manufacturing facilities. Certain environmental laws impose strict, and in certain circumstances, joint and several liability on current orprevious owners or operators of real property for the cost of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances as well as liability for relateddamages to natural resources. Certain of these laws also assess liability on persons who arrange for hazardous substances to be sent to disposal or treatmentfacilities when such facilities are found to be contaminated. While we do not expect that any contamination currently known to us will have a materialadverse effect on our business, we cannot assure you that this is the case or that we will not discover new facts or conditions or that environmental laws or theenforcement of such laws will not change such that our liabilities would be increased significantly. In addition, we could also be held liable for consequencesarising out of human exposure to hazardous substances or other environmental damage. In summary, we cannot assure you that our costs of complying withcurrent and future environmental and health and safety laws, or our liabilities arising from past or future releases of, or exposures to, regulated materials, willnot have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.Scientific examination of, political attention to and rules and regulations on issues surrounding the existence and extent of climate change may resultin an increase in the cost of production due to increase in the prices of energy and introduction of energy or carbon tax. A variety of regulatory developmentshave been introduced that focus on restricting or managing the emission of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases. Enterprises may need topurchase at higher costs new equipment or raw materials with lower carbon footprints. Environmental laws and regulations could also require us to acquirepollution abatement or remediation equipment, modify product designs, or incur expenses. New materials that we are evaluating for use in our operationsmay become subject to regulation. These developments and further legislation that is likely to be enacted could affect our operations negatively. Changes inenvironmental regulations could increase our production and operational costs, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financialcondition.Certain natural disasters, such as flooding, large earthquakes, volcanic eruptions or nuclear or other disasters, may negatively impact our business.There is increasing concern that climate change is occurring and may cause a rising number of natural disasters.Environmental and other disasters, such as flooding, large earthquakes, volcanic eruptions or nuclear or other disasters, or a combination thereof maynegatively impact our business. If flooding, a large earthquake, volcanic eruption or other natural disaster were to directly damage, destroy or disrupt ourmanufacturing facilities, it could disrupt our operations, delay new production and shipments of existing inventory or result in costly repairs, replacements orother costs, all of which would negatively impact our business. Even if our manufacturing facilities are not directly damaged, a large natural disaster mayresult in disruptions in distribution channels or supply chains and significant increases in the prices of raw materials used for our manufacturing process. Forinstance, the nuclear incident following the tsunami in Japan in 2011 impacted the supply chains of our customers and suppliers. Furthermore, any disasteraffecting our customers (or their respective customers) may significantly negatively impact the demand for our products and our revenues.The impact of any such natural disasters depends on the specific geographic circumstances but could be significant, as some of our factories are locatedin areas with known earthquake fault zones, flood or storm risks, including but not limited to the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia or Thailand.There is increasing concern that climate change is occurring that may cause a rising number of natural disasters with potentially dramatic effects on humanactivity. We cannot predict the economic impact, if any, of natural disasters or climate change.The price of our common stock historically has been volatile. The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.The stock market in recent years has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performanceof companies. The market price for our common stock has varied between a high of $78.34 on November 28, 2014 and a low of $42.42 on January 13, 2014in the twelve-month period ending on December 31, 2014. The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile and subject tosignificant price and volume fluctuations for many reasons, including in response to the risks described in this section, or for reasons unrelated to ouroperations, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions or negative announcements by our customers, competitors, peer companies or suppliersregarding their own performance, or announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, market perception of the Merger with Freescale or otheracquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, joint marketing relationships or capital commitments, the passage of legislation or other regulatorydevelopments affecting us or our industry, as well as industry conditions and general financial, economic and political instability. In the past, followingperiods of market volatility, shareholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have asubstantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.We have not paid dividends in the past and may not do so in the foreseeable future.We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and may not pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currentlyretain all of our earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business, to repurchase or redeem capital stock, and in the repayment of our debt.Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their shares of common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize anyfuture gains on their investments. 14Table of ContentsFuture sales of our shares of common stock could depress the market price of our outstanding shares of common stock.The market price of our shares of common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market, or theperception that these sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equitysecurities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.In the future, we may issue additional shares of common stock in connection with acquisitions and other investments, as well as in connection with ourcurrent or any revised or new equity plans for management and other employees. The amount of our common stock issued in connection with any suchtransaction could constitute a material portion of our then outstanding common stock.Our actual operating results may differ significantly from our guidance.From time to time, we release guidance regarding our future performance that represents our management’s estimates as of the date of release. Thisguidance, which consists of forward-looking statements, is prepared by our management and is qualified by, and subject to, the assumptions and the otherinformation contained or referred to in such release and the factors described under “Forward-Looking Statements”. Our guidance is not prepared with a viewtoward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our independent registered publicaccounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the guidance and, accordingly, no such person expresses anyopinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.Our guidance is based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, is inherently subject to significantbusiness, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions withrespect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We generally state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide asensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principalreason that we release this data is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept anyresponsibility for any projections or reports published by any such persons.Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will notmaterialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of thedate of release. Actual results will vary from the guidance and the variations may be material. Investors should also recognize that the reliability of anyforecasted financial data diminishes the farther in the future the data is forecasted. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to put the guidance in contextand not to place undue reliance on it.Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy, failure to close on the proposed merger with Freescale or the occurrence of any of theevents or circumstances set forth in, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report could result in the actual operating results being different than theguidance, and such differences may be adverse and material.Risks related to our corporate structureUnited States civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us.We are incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands and substantial portions of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition,certain members of our board, our officers and certain experts named herein reside outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors toeffect service of process within the United States upon us or such other persons residing outside the United States, or to enforce outside the United Statesjudgments obtained against such persons in U.S. courts in any action. In addition, it may be difficult for investors to enforce, in original actions brought incourts in jurisdictions located outside the United States, rights predicated upon the U.S. laws.In the absence of an applicable treaty for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercialmatters to which the United States and the Netherlands are a party, a judgment obtained against the Company in the courts of the United States, whether ornot predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws, including a judgment predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities law orsecurities laws of any State or territory within the United States, will not be directly enforceable in the Netherlands.In order to obtain a judgment which is enforceable in the Netherlands, the claim must be relitigated before a competent court of the Netherlands; therelevant Netherlands court has discretion to attach such weight to a judgment of the courts of the United States as it deems appropriate; based on case law, thecourts of the Netherlands may be expected to recognize and grant permission for enforcement of a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction in the UnitedStates without re-examination or relitigation of the substantive matters adjudicated thereby, provided that (i) the relevant court in the United States hadjurisdiction in the matter in accordance with standards which are generally accepted internationally; (ii) the proceedings before that court complied withprinciples of proper procedure; (iii) recognition and/or enforcement of that judgment does not conflict with the public policy of the Netherlands; and(iv) recognition and/or enforcement of that judgment is not irreconcilable with a decision of a Dutch court rendered between the same parties or with anearlier decision of a foreign court rendered between the same parties in a dispute that is about the same subject matter and that is based on the same cause,provided that earlier decision can be recognized in the Netherlands. 15Table of ContentsBased on the foregoing, there can be no assurance that U.S. investors will be able to enforce against us or members of our board of directors, officers orcertain experts named herein who are residents of the Netherlands or countries other than the United States any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil andcommercial matters.In addition, there is doubt as to whether a Dutch court would impose civil liability on us, the members of our board of directors, our officers or certainexperts named herein in an original action predicated solely upon the U.S. laws brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the Netherlands against us orsuch members, officers or experts, respectively.We are a Dutch public company with limited liability. The rights of our stockholders may be different from the rights of stockholders governed by thelaws of U.S. jurisdictions.We are a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap). Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of association andby the laws governing companies incorporated in the Netherlands. The rights of stockholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directorsmay be different from the rights and obligations of stockholders in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In the performance of its duties, ourboard of directors is required by Dutch law to consider the interests of our company, its stockholders, its employees and other stakeholders, in all cases withdue observation of the principles of reasonableness and fairness. It is possible that some of these parties will have interests that are different from, or inaddition to, your interests as a stockholder. See Part II, Item 16G. Corporate Governance.Our articles of association, Dutch corporate law and our current and future debt instruments contain provisions that may discourage a takeoverattempt.Provisions contained in our articles of association and the laws of the Netherlands, the country in which we are incorporated, could make it moredifficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our stockholders. Provisions of our articles of association impose variousprocedural and other requirements, which could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions.Our general meeting of stockholders has empowered our board of directors to issue additional shares and grant rights to subscribe for shares in the formof shares of common or preferred stock, up to the maximum of the relevant class or series included in the authorized share capital and to restrict or excludepre-emptive rights pertaining to (the right to subscribe for) shares for a period of five years from August 2, 2010 until August 2, 2015. Although we have notand do not envisage to adopting any specific takeover measures, our preferred shares are separate classes of equity securities that could be issued fordefensive purposes. Such shares would typically have both a liquidation and dividend preference over our shares of common stock and otherwise accrue cashdividends at a fixed rate.In addition, our debt instruments contain, and future debt instruments may also contain, provisions that require prepayment or offers to prepay upon achange of control. These clauses may also discourage takeover attempts.We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, are not subject to U.S. proxy rules but are subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations that, tosome extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of a U.S. issuer.We report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status.Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act and although we follow Dutch laws and regulations with regard to such matters, we areexempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. public companies, including: (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulatingthe solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act (ii) the sections of the Exchange Actrequiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short periodof time and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the Commission of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financialand other specified information, or current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified significant events. In addition, foreign private issuers arerequired to file their Annual Report on Form 20-F by 120 days after the end of each fiscal year while U.S. domestic issuers that are large accelerated filers arerequired to file their Annual Report on Form 10-K within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from the RegulationFair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. As a result of the above, even though we arecontractually obligated and intend to make interim reports available to our stockholders, copies of which we are required to furnish to the Securities andExchange Commission (the “SEC”) on a Form 6-K, and even though we are required to furnish reports on Form 6-K disclosing whatever information we havemade or are required to make public pursuant to Dutch law or distribute to our stockholders and that is material to our company, you may not have the sameprotections afforded to investors in companies that are not foreign private issuers. 16Table of ContentsWe are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market we rely on certainhome country governance practices rather than the corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market.We are a foreign private issuer. As a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market we rely on home countrygovernance requirements and certain exemptions thereunder rather than relying on the corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ Global SelectMarket. For an overview of our corporate governance principles, see “Item 16G.- Corporate Governance” of our 2014 Annual Report, including the sectiondescribing the differences between the corporate governance requirements applicable to common stock listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and theDutch corporate governance requirements. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are not foreignprivate issuers.Risks related to our indebtednessOur debt obligations expose us to risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, which could adversely affect our results of operations.As of December 31, 2014, we had outstanding indebtedness with an aggregate principal amount of $4,206 million. Our substantial indebtedness couldhave a material adverse effect on our business by: • increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments; • requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereforereducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities; • exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our indebtedness, including our loans under the Secured Revolving Credit Facilityand Term Loans, bear interest at a variable rate; • making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, including the Notes, and any failure to comply with theobligations of any our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, could result in an event default under the indenturegoverning the Notes and the indentures and agreements governing such other indebtedness; • restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures; • limiting our ability to obtain additional financial for working capital, capital expenditures, restructurings, product development, research anddevelopment, debt service requirements, investments, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and • limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantagecompared to our competitors who are less highly leveraged and who therefore, may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverageprevents us from exploiting.Despite our level of indebtedness, we may still incur significantly more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks described above and affect ourability to service and repay our debt.If we do not comply with the covenants in our debt agreements or fail to generate sufficient cash to service and repay our debt, it could adverselyaffect our operating results and our financial condition.The Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the Term Loans, the indentures governing the Unsecured Notes or any other debt arrangements that we mayhave require us to comply with various covenants. If there were an event of default under any of our debt instruments that was not cured or waived, theholders of the defaulted debt could terminate commitments to lend and cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt to be due and payableimmediately, which in turn could result in cross defaults under our other debt instruments. Our assets and cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repayborrowings under all of our outstanding debt instruments if some or all of these instruments are accelerated upon an event of default.Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which issubject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyondour control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or future borrowings under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility or fromother sources may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness, or to fund our other liquidity needs, including ourworking capital and capital expenditure requirements, and we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additionalcapital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness.If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capitalexpenditures, or to sell assets, seek additional capital, restructure or refinance our indebtedness or reduce or delay capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions,investments and alliances, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain enoughcapital to service our debt and fund our planned capital expenditures and business plan. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on thecondition of the capital 17Table of Contentsmarkets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with moreonerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. The terms of existing or future debt instruments may restrict us from adopting someof these alternatives. In addition, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely resultin a reduction of our credit rating, which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and maynot permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.The conditional conversion feature of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition andoperating results.In the event the conditional conversion feature of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes is triggered, holders thereof will be entitled to convert the2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes solely into cash at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their 2019Cash Convertible Senior Notes, we would be required to pay cash to settle any such conversion, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, evenif holders do not elect to convert their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or aportion of the outstanding aggregate principal of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which may adverselyaffect our net working capital.The accounting for the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes will result in our having to recognize interest expense significantly greater than thestated interest rate of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes and may result in volatility to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.We will settle conversions of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes entirely in cash. Accordingly, the conversion option that is part of the 2019Cash Convertible Senior Notes will be accounted for as a derivative pursuant to applicable accounting standards relating to derivative instruments andhedging activities. In general, this resulted in an initial valuation of the conversion option, which was bifurcated from the debt component of the 2019 CashConvertible Senior Notes, resulting in an original issue discount. The original issue discount will be amortized and recognized as a component of interestexpense over the term of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, which will result in an effective interest rate reported in our Consolidated Statements ofOperations significantly in excess of the stated coupon of 1.0%. This accounting treatment will reduce our earnings, but it will not affect the amount of cashinterest paid to holders of Notes or our cash flows.For each financial statement period after issuance of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, a hedge gain or loss will be reported in our ConsolidatedStatements of Operations to the extent the valuation of the conversion option changes from the previous period. The cash convertible note hedge transactionswe entered into in connection with the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes will also be accounted for as derivative instruments, generally offsetting the gainor loss associated with changes to the valuation of the conversion option. Although we do not expect there to be a material net impact to our ConsolidatedStatements of Operations as a result of issuing the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes and entering into the cash convertible note hedge transactions, wecannot assure you that these transactions will be completely offset, which may result in volatility to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.The accounting of the warrant transactions requires the warrants being marked-to-market as liabilities on a quarterly basis, and may result involatility to our earnings each quarterly period.Concurrently with the pricing of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes on November 24, 2014, we entered into warrant transactions with the optioncounterparties pursuant to which we sold warrants to purchase our common stock. Under U.S. GAAP, the fair value of the warrants would be subject tochanges in currency exchange rates because the warrants’ strike price is denominated in U.S. dollars, which is different from our functional currency, which iseuros. As a result, under U.S. GAAP, the warrants are not considered indexed to our own stock, which in turn results in the warrants being classified asliabilities on our balance sheet and required to be marked-to-market on a quarterly basis. Applying mark-to-market accounting to the liability-classifiedwarrants may result in volatility to our earnings. As our stock price increases, the fair value of the warrants increases, and accordingly our liability increases.This increase is reflected as an expense in our consolidated statements of operations, which leads to lower earnings for the quarterly period. Conversely, asour stock price decreases, the fair value of the warrants declines, resulting in a gain that is reported in our consolidated statements of operations, which leadsto higher earnings for the quarterly period. Item 4.Information on the CompanyA. History and Development of the CompanyName and HistoryOur legal name is NXP Semiconductors N.V. and our commercial name is “NXP” or “NXP Semiconductors”.We were incorporated in the Netherlands as a Dutch private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met 18Table of Contentsbeperkte aansprakelijkheid) under the name KASLION Acquisition B.V. on August 2, 2006, in connection with the sale by Philips of 80.1% of itssemiconductor business to the “Private Equity Consortium”. Initially, the Private Equity Consortium invested in our Company through KASLION HoldingB.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability.On May 21, 2010, we converted into a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed our name to NXPSemiconductors N.V. Concurrently, we amended our articles of association in order to effect a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our shares of common stock.On August 5, 2010, we made an initial public offering of 34 million shares of our common stock and listed our common stock on the NASDAQ GlobalSelect Market.In 2014, the last members of the Private Equity Consortium sold their remaining shares of our common stock. Representatives of certain members of thePrivate Equity Consortium continue to serve on our Board of Directors.On March 2, 2015, NXP announced that the company has entered into a definitive agreement under which NXP will merge with FreescaleSemiconductor, Ltd. (Freescale).Under the terms of the agreement, Freescale shareholders will receive $6.25 in cash and 0.3521 of an NXP ordinary share for each Freescale commonshare held at the close of the transaction. The purchase price implies a total equity value for Freescale of approximately $11.8 billion (based on NXP’sclosing stock price as of February 27, 2015) and a total enterprise value of approximately $16.7 billion including Freescale’s net debt. The transaction isexpected to close in the second half of calendar 2015. NXP intends to fund the transaction with $1.0 billion of cash from its balance sheet, $1.0 billion of newdebt and approximately 115 million of NXP ordinary shares. Post transaction, Freescale shareholders are expected to own approximately 32 percent of thecombined company. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is subject to regulatory approvals invarious jurisdictions and customary closing conditions, as well as the approval of NXP and Freescale shareholders. Upon consummation, we expect toaccount for the merger under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic805, Business Combinations, with NXP treated as the accounting acquirer.We are a holding company whose only material assets are the direct ownership of 100% of the shares of NXP B.V., a Dutch private company withlimited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid).Our corporate seat is in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Our principal executive office is at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, the Netherlands,and our telephone number is +31 40 2729233. Our registered agent in the United States is NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc., 411 East Plumeria Drive, San Jose,CA 95134, United States of America, phone number +1 408 5185400.Reporting SegmentsNXP is organized into two market oriented reportable segments, High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) and Standard Products (“SP”). Corporateand Other represents the remaining portion (or “segment”) to reconcile to the Consolidated Financial Statements. You can find a description of each of ourreportable segments below. We also have a manufacturing group that manages our manufacturing and supply chain activities. Prior to January 1, 2013 we hadthree reportable segments: HPMS, SP and Manufacturing Operations. During the first quarter of 2013 we moved our General Purpose Logic Product Line fromour HPMS segment (Portable & Computing) to our SP segment; and our NXP software product line to our HPMS Segment (Industrial & Infrastructure) fromCorporate and Other. We also determined in the fourth quarter of 2013 that Manufacturing Operations no longer meets the criteria for separate reporting as areportable segment and consequently, its results are now reflected within Corporate and Other. As a result of the above changes to the composition of ouroperating and reportable segments, corresponding information for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.B. Business OverviewOur CompanyWe are a global semiconductor company and a long-standing supplier in the industry, with over 50 years of innovation and operating history. Weprovide leading High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage our deep application insight and our technology andmanufacturing expertise in security, interface, RF, analog, power management and digital processing products. Our product solutions are used in a wide rangeof applications such as: automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer and computing. We engage with leadingoriginal equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) worldwide and 68% of our revenue in 2014 was derived from Asia Pacific (excluding Japan).As of December 31, 2014, we had 27,884 full-time equivalent employees located in over 20 countries, with research and development activities inAsia, Europe and the United States, and manufacturing facilities in Asia and Europe. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we generated revenue of $5,647million.Markets, applications and productsWe sell two categories of products, High Performance Mixed Signal product solutions and Standard Products. The first category, which consists ofhighly differentiated application-specific High Performance Mixed Signal semiconductors and system solutions, accounted for 77% of our total productrevenue in 2014. We believe that High Performance Mixed Signal is an attractive market in terms of growth, barriers to entry, relative business and pricingstability and capital intensity. The second of our product categories, Standard Products, accounted for 23% of our total product revenue in 2014, and consistsof devices that can be incorporated in many different types of electronics equipment and that are typically sold to a wide variety of customers, both directlyand through distributors. Manufacturing cost, supply chain efficiency and continuous improvement of manufacturing processes drive the profitability of ourStandard Products.Reorganization of HPMS segmentEffective January 1, 2015, NXP has reorganized the HPMS segment from the four business lines: Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrialand Portable & Computing into the following four business lines: Automotive, Secure Identification Solutions, Secure Connected Devices and SecureInterfaces and Power. 19Table of ContentsHigh Performance Mixed SignalWe focus on developing products and system and sub-system solutions that are innovative and allow our customers to bring their end products tomarket more quickly. Our products, particularly our application system and sub-system solutions, help our customers design critical parts of their endproducts and thus help many of them to differentiate themselves based on feature performance, advanced functionality, cost or time-to-market.We leverage our technical expertise in the areas of RF, analog, power management, interface, security technologies and digital processing across ourpriority applications markets. Our strong RF capabilities are utilized in our high performance RF for wireless infrastructure and industrial applications,television tuners, car security and car radio products and contactless identification products. Our power technologies and capabilities are applied in ourlighting products, AC-DC power conversion and audio power products, while our ability to design ultra-low power semiconductors is used in a wide range ofour products including our consumer, mobile, identification, healthcare products and our microcontrollers. Our high-speed interface design skills are appliedin our interface products business, and our security solutions are used in our identification, microcontroller, telematics and smart metering products andsolutions. Finally, our digital processing capabilities are used in our Auto DSPs, the products leveraging our Coolflux ultra-low power DSPs, such as in ourhearing aid business, and our microcontroller based products. In addition, our digital processing knowledge is used to design High Performance MixedSignal solutions that leverage other suppliers’ digital processing products.The High Performance Mixed Signal segment is organized into four business lines named: Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial andPortable & Computing. The below table provides an overview of the key applications per business line, the leading market positions and our key customers. Automotive Identification Infrastructure & Industrial Portable & ComputingKey applications • Car access & immobilizers• In vehicle networking• Car entertainment• Telematics• ABS• Transmission/ throttle control• Automotive Lighting • Secure identity• Secure transactions• Tagging &authentication • Wireless base stations• Satellite & CATV infra• Radar• Power supplies• Lighting• Personal Healthcare• TV & Set-top boxes• Mobile Handsets • Mobile handset• Tablet• Monitor• Personal computer• Smart metering• White goods & homeappliances• Pachinko machines• Medical• Industrial• ConsumerSelected marketleading positions • #1 Can/LIN/ Flex Ray in-vehicle networking• #1 passive keyless entry/immobilizers• #1 car radio• #2 audio amplifiers • #1 e-Government• #1 Transport & Accessmanagement• #1 Banking• #1 NFC • #2 in RF Power • # 3 in sensor hubKey OEM andelectronicmanufacturingservices (EMS) endcustomers • Becker• Bosch• Clarion• Continental• Delphi• Fujitsu Ten• Hyundai• Mitsubishi• Panasonic• Visteon • Apple• Bundesdruckerei• Gemalto• Giesecke• Kona• Oberthur• Samsung• Smartrac• Sony• Wuhan/Tianyu Info • Alcatel• BBK• Ericsson• HTC• Huawei• NSN• Philips• Samsung• Sony• ZTE • Apple• Continental• Foxconn• Huawei• Inventec• Samsung• Vasco• Wistron• ZLG Electronics• ZTEThe list above, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabetical order, represents our key OEM, ODM and electronic manufacturing servicesend customers based on 2014 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Edom, Vitec and WPG.Automotive. In the automotive market we are a leader in in-vehicle networking, car passive keyless entry and immobilization, and car radio and caraudio amplifiers. We also have an emerging business in car solid state lighting drivers and are investing in growth areas, such as Car2X communicationproducts which relate to assisted and autonomous driving.In the can/LIN/FlexRay in-vehicle networking market, we are the market leader, having played a defining role in setting the can/LIN and more recentlyFlexRay standards. We are a leading supplier to major OEMs and continue to drive new system concepts, such as partial networking for enhanced energyefficiency. In the car access and immobilizers market, we lead the development of new passive keyless entry/start and two-way key concepts with ourcustomers and, as a result, we are a key supplier to almost all car OEMs for those products. We are the market leader in AM/FM car radio chip sets.Our leadership in mid- and high-end car radio is driven by excellent reception performance, whereas in the low-end and after-market car radio, ourleadership is driven by our one-chip radio solutions that offer ease of implementation and low cost of ownership. In digital reception, we have developedmulti-standard radios based on our software-defined radio implementation. Based on these software-defined radio technology, we are developing Car2Xcommunication products. In addition, we provide class-AB and class-D audio amplifiers and power analog products for car entertainment. We leverage ourproprietary processes for automotive, high-voltage, RF and non-volatile processes as well as our technology standards and leading edge security IPdeveloped by our identification business, to deliver our automotive solutions. We are compliant with all globally relevant automotive quality standards(such as ISO/TS16949 and VDA6.3). 20Table of ContentsIn 2013, we made (together with Cisco), a strategic investment in Cohda Wireless, an equipment vendor in the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS)market with whom we co-operate for Car2X solutions. In December 2013, we announced a joint venture with Datang Telecom, targeting the China domestichybrid and electrical car market which became active in April 2014. In December 2013, we also announced the intended sale of our Telematics Modulebusiness to Telit communications which was closed end of March 2014.For the full year 2014, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $1,144 million in automotive applications, compared to $1,019 million in2013, which represents a 12.3% year over year increase. According to Strategy Analytics, the total market for automotive semiconductors was $27.7 billion in2013, and projects it will grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 7.4% between 2013 and 2017. According to Strategy Analytics’ estimates we were thefifth largest supplier of automotive semiconductors worldwide in 2013.Identification. Based on revenue in 2014, NXP continues to have the leading position in the overall identification chip market segment. We address allsegments of the market, except for the commodity SIM market. We are the largest supplier world-wide of ICs for e-government, transportation and accessmanagement.NXP is a global market segment leader in the EMV migration wave in which credit and debit cards around the world are transitioning from non-securemagnetic stripes to secure chips.Our MIFARE products are widely used in worldwide e-passport projects and public transport systems that have adopted electronic ticketing.We have led the development and standard setting of Near Field Communications (NFC), which is a rapidly growing standard for secure short-rangeconnectivity. In combination with our Secure Element portfolio, this has given us a leadership position in Mobile wallets and Mobile payment.Our leadership in the identification market is based on the breadth of our product portfolio underpinned by the successful launch of new productplatforms led by the strength of our security and our end-to-end system contactless read speed performance.Key growth drivers will be the further adoption of security ICs in governmental documents and payment cards, the adoption of new security standards,the need for multi-application solutions in existing smart card markets and the increasing needs of anti-counterfeiting solutions.For the full year 2014, we had High Performance Mixed Signal revenue of $1,469 million in identification applications, compared to $1,297 million in2013, which represents a 13.3% year over year growth. According to ABI Research, the market size for identification ICs was $3.3 billion in 2013, and isexpected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 14% to $5.6 billion in 2017.Infrastructure and Industrial. We have a leading market position in high-performance radio frequency solutions and have a broad portfolio in lightingdrivers and strong positions in selected niche segments of the AC-DC power conversion and personal healthcare markets. In addition, we have an emergingbusiness in low power connectivity and mobile audio. Our overall revenue in these businesses was $883 million in 2014 versus $729 million in 2013, whichrepresents an increase of 21.1% year over year.Our leading high-performance radio frequency business mainly provides RF front-end solutions for markets, such as mobile base stations, wirelessconnectivity, satellite and CATV infrastructure and receivers, industrial applications, and to a lesser extent addresses the military and aerospace markets. Wehave a leading position in RF Power Amplifiers and significant sales in Small Signal RF discretes and RF ICs for mobile, consumer electronics and cabletelevision infrastructure, while we have emerging businesses in RF ICs for mobile base stations and monolithic microwave ICs (“MMICs”). Our leadership isbased on our world-class proprietary RF process technologies and technology advancements that drive overall system performance, such as power scaling inmobile base stations. We are engaged with the majority of the largest customers in mobile base stations and in several other application areas. Key growthdrivers for our high-performance RF business include infrastructure build-outs driven by the substantial growth in mobile data use and digital broadcastadoption, infrastructure development of developing countries, including China, 4G roll out, and our expansion into new product markets such as wirelesscommunications LNAs and infrastructure MMICs. We estimate that the market for RF Power Amplifiers was $0.8 billion in 2013 and is expected to grow witha compounded annual growth rate of 8.8% till 2017.Our market strengths are our specialty RF process technology, decades of experience in designing tuners that work under all broadcasting standardsand conditions across the world, and our innovations in new broadcasting standards.In lighting, we have a broad driver portfolio serving all main segments in general lighting applications. Our strength in lighting ICs is based on ourleading-edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and system optimization concepts, such as our patented technology to develop sensors-lesstemperature-controlled LED drivers. The growth of the lighting IC market has been partly driven by government regulations around the world that ban ordiscourage the use of incandescent light bulbs and encourage or mandate CFL and LED lighting solutions and by energy-savings conscious customers. 21Table of ContentsWe are a key player in high efficiency AC-DC power conversion ICs for notebook personal computers (our “green chip” solutions). Our strength in AC-DC power conversion is based on our leading edge high-voltage power analog process technologies and engineering capabilities in designing highefficiency power conversion products. Due to worldwide conservation efforts, many countries, states and local governments have adopted regulations thatincrease the demand for higher power efficiency solutions in computing and consumer applications, especially in power conversion.Our personal healthcare revenue is generated by our hearing aid products, which leverage our proprietary ultra low power Coolflux DSP, our low poweraudio IC design capabilities and our magnetic induction radio technology. We design customer-specific ICs for major hearing aid OEMs, and many of thesecustomers fund our product development efforts.In addition, we have two emerging product areas, one focused on the mobile audio market and the other on the low power connectivity market. Ourmobile audio business focuses on smart speaker drivers and leverages many of the same core technologies and competencies as our personal healthcarebusiness. In 2012 we started shipping to a key smart phone OEMs, followed by many other design wins and significant revenue ramp up in 2014. Our lowpower connectivity business started in 2010 through the acquisition of Jennic, which brought us a portfolio of 802.15.4-based low power connectivity ICswith a broad range of both the Zigbee standard-based as well as proprietary protocol stacks. In November 2014 we entered into a definitive agreement withQuintic to acquire assets and IP, which will add Bluetooth Low Energy to our connectivity portfolio. With this portfolio we target the emerging Internet ofThings market, starting with application solutions for smart lighting, smart energy, wireless remote controls & switches and healthcare monitoring.We also sell software solutions for mobile phones through our NXP Software business.The NXP Software solutions business develops audio solutions that enable mobile device manufacturers to produce differentiated hand held productsthat enhance the end-user experience. Our software has been incorporated into over 1 billion mobile devices produced by many of the world’s leading mobiledevice manufacturers.Portable and Computing. We are a top three supplier in the fragmented interface market outside Japan and have a strong portfolio in 32-bit ARMmicrocontrollers. Our overall High Performance Mixed Signal revenue in these businesses was $712 million in 2014, compared to $488 million in 2013,which represents a 45.9% year over year growth.In microcontrollers, we have a strong position in multi-purpose 32-bit ARM microcontrollers serving a broad array of applications. ARM processorcores have been gaining momentum in the general purpose MCU market during the past few years. Our competitive advantage is based on having been alaunching partner for several low power ARM microcontroller cores, our rich portfolio of analog and security IP, which we integrate with the ARM core into afamily of microcontroller products, and our distribution leverage based on our ability to offer a full microcontroller software development kit. Our ARMCortex M0-based products achieve pricing levels that places it squarely in competition with 8-bit microcontrollers, while offering better performance in termsof processing speed and system power consumption, expanding the addressable market for 32-bit ARM microcontrollers at the expense of 8-bit ARMmicrocontrollers. Gartner 1 estimates the worldwide market for Microcontrollers 32-bit to be $5.7 billion in 2013, and expects a compounded annual growthrate of 7.6% between 2013 and 2017 2.The interface products market is highly fragmented with niche markets around each of the established interface standards. Our products address manyinterface standards and we serve various applications across the mobile, computing, industrial, consumer and automotive markets. We have broad productportfolios in five interface segments, being UARTs and bridges, I 2 C and SPI LED controllers, low power real-time clocks and watch ICs, HDMI switches andtransceivers, and display port multiplexers. Our core competencies are the design of high speed interfaces, high voltage design needed for LED and LCDdrivers, ultra low power design for real-time clocks and watch ICs, and our ability to engage with leading OEMs in defining new interface standards andproduct designs. While we successfully engage with leading OEMs to drive our innovation roadmaps, we generate a large part of our revenue bysubsequently selling these products to a very broad customer base, which we serve through our distribution channel. We are engaged in developmentactivities and standard setting initiatives with many of the innovation leaders in each of these markets. Key growth drivers will be the adoption rate of newhigh-speed interface standards such as display port and USB, and application specific interface products for the mobile market. According to Gartner, theworldwide Interface IC market is projected to grow at a 4.5% compounded annual rate between 2013 and 2017, from a revenue base of $1.5 billion in 2013 2. 1 The Gartner Report(s) described herein, (the “Gartner Report(s)”) represent(s) data, research opinion or viewpoints published, as part of a syndicatedsubscription service, by Gartner, Inc. (“Gartner”), and are not representations of fact. Each Gartner Report speaks as of its original publication date (and notas of the date of this Filing) and the opinions expressed in the Gartner Report(s) are subject to change without notice.2 Source: Gartner, Inc., Semiconductor Forecast Database, 4Q14 Update, December, 2014. 22Table of ContentsStandard ProductsOur Standard Products business supplies a broad range of standard semiconductor components, such as small signal discretes, power discretes,protection and signal conditioning devices and standard logic devices, which we largely produce in dedicated in-house high-volume manufacturingoperations. Our portfolio consists of a large variety of catalog products, using widely-known production techniques, with characteristics that are largelystandardized throughout the industry as well as leading discrete solutions especially in the field of ESD protection / EMI filtering and low loss rectificationand power switching. Our Standard Products are often sold as separate components, but in many cases, are used in conjunction with our High PerformanceMixed Signal solutions, often within the same subsystems. Further, we are able to leverage customer engagements where we provide standard productsdevices, as discrete components, within a system to identify and pursue potential High Performance Mixed Signal opportunities.Our products are sold both directly to OEMs as well as through distribution, and are primarily differentiated on cost, packaging type andminiaturization, and supply chain performance. Alternatively, our innovative products include “design-in” products, which require significant engineeringeffort to be designed into an application solution. For these products, our efforts make it more difficult for a competitor to easily replace our product, whichmakes these businesses more predictable in terms of revenue and pricing than is typical for standard products.Our key product applications, markets and customers are described in the table below. Key Products• SS Transistors and Diodes• SS MOS• Power MOS• Bipolar Power Transistors• Thyristors• Rectifiers• Interface protection devices• General Purpose LogicKey OEM andelectronic manufacturing services (EMS) endcustomers• Apple• Asustek• Bosch• Continental• Delphi• Delta Electronics• Huawei• LGE• Philips• SamsungThe list above, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabetical order, represents our key OEM and electronic manufacturing services endcustomers based on 2014 revenue. Key distributors across these applications are Arrow, Avnet, Future and WPG.In 2014, our Standard Products business generated net revenue of $1,275 million, compared to $1,145 million in 2013, which represents a 11.4% yearover year growth.We are the number one global supplier of small-signal discretes with one of the broadest product portfolios in the industry. We have a strong positiondue to our strong cost competitiveness, supply chain performance, leverage of our OEM relationships and a broadening portfolio. We are focusing onexpanding our share of higher margin products in this business. In addition, we are also building a small signal MOSFET product line, which leverages oursmall signal transistors and diodes packaging operations and strong customer relationships. In addition to our small signal discretes products, we have aPower MOSFET product line, which is focused on the low-voltage segment of the market. The majority of our revenue in Power MOSFETs is to automotivecustomers.We have introduced a new range of Automotive Power MOSFET products in our Trench 6 manufacturing process. Finally, we have small bipolarpower, thyristor and rectifier product lines, which are focused on specific applications, such as white goods and power supplies, and are sold as part of ouroverall High Performance Mixed Signal application solutions. We estimate that the market for discretes, excluding RF & Microwave, was $18 billion in 2013and is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 5%, between 2013 and 2017.Next to discrete semiconductors, the Standard Products segment also includes Standard Logic ICs. We have the number two position in Standard LogicIC markets 3 based on worldwide revenue for 2013, which we leverage in a large number of our High Performance Mixed Signal solutions. We offer severalproduct families for low-voltage applications in communication equipment, personal computers, personal computer peripherals and consumer and portableelectronics. Our 3V and 5V families hold a leading share of the logic market. We continue to expand into the higher margin product range in this business byexpanding, among others, our switches and translators (or custom logic) portfolio and optimizing our manufacturing. Gartner sizes the worldwide StandardLogic market at $1.5 billion in 2013, and is estimated to grow with compound annual rate of 2.9% between 2013 and 2017 2. 3 Source: Gartner, Inc., Market Share, Semiconductor Applications, Worldwide, 2013, March 2014 23Table of ContentsCorporate and OtherWe manufacture integrated circuits and discrete semiconductors through a combination of wholly owned manufacturing facilities, manufacturingfacilities operated jointly with other semiconductor companies and third-party foundries and assembly and test subcontractors. Our manufacturing operationsprimarily focus on manufacturing and supplying products to our High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Products businesses. We manage ourmanufacturing assets together through one centralized organization to ensure we realize scale benefits in asset utilization, purchasing volumes and overheadleverage across businesses.In the future, we expect to outsource an increased part of our internal demand for wafer foundry and packaging services to third-party manufacturingsources in order to increase our flexibility to accommodate increased demand mainly in our High Performance Mixed Signal and to a lesser extent inStandard Products businesses.The manufacturing of a semiconductor involves several phases of production, which can be broadly divided into “front-end” and “back-end”processes. Front-end processes take place at highly complex wafer manufacturing facilities (called fabrication plants or “wafer fabs”), and involve theimprinting of substrate silicon wafers with the precise circuitry required for semiconductors to function. The front-end production cycle requires high levelsof precision and involves as many as 300 process steps. Back-end processes involve the assembly, test and packaging of semiconductors in a form suitable fordistribution. In contrast to the highly complex front-end process, back-end processing is generally less complicated, and as a result we tend to determine thelocation of our back-end facilities based more on cost factors than on technical considerations.We primarily focus our internal and joint venture wafer manufacturing operations on running proprietary specialty process technologies that enable usto differentiate our products on key performance features, and we generally outsource wafer manufacturing in process technologies that are available at third-party wafer foundries when it is economical to do so. In addition, we increasingly focus our in-house manufacturing on our competitive 8-inch facilities,which predominantly run manufacturing processes in the 140 nanometer, 180 nanometer and 250 nanometer process nodes, and have concentrated themajority of our manufacturing base in Asia. This focus increases our return on invested capital and reduces capital expenditures.Our front-end manufacturing facilities use a broad range of production processes and proprietary design methods, including CMOS, bipolar, bipolarCMOS (“BiCMOS”) and double-diffused metal on silicon oxide semiconductor (“DMOS”) technologies. Our wafer fabs produce semiconductors with linewidths ranging from 140 nanometers to 3 microns for integrated circuits and 0.5 microns to greater than 4 microns for discretes. This broad technologyportfolio enables us to meet increasing demand from customers for system solutions, which require a variety of technologies.Our back-end manufacturing facilities test and package many different types of products using a wide variety of processes. To optimize flexibility, weuse shared technology platforms for our back-end assembly operations. Most of our assembly and test activities are maintained in-house. Finally, a number ofour High Performance Mixed Signal products enjoy significant packaging cost and innovation benefits due to the scale of our Standard Products business,which manufactures tens of billions of units per year. 24Table of ContentsThe following table shows selected key information with respect to our major front-end and back-end facilities: Site Ownership Wafer sizes used Line widths used (vm) Technology (Microns) Front-end Singapore(1) 61.2% 8” 0.14-0.25 CMOSJilin, China 100% 5” >4 BipolarNijmegen, the Netherlands 100% 8” 0.14-0.80 CMOS, BiCMOS, LDMOSHamburg, Germany 100% 6”/8” 0.5-3.0 Discretes, BipolarManchester, United Kingdom 100% 6” 0.5 Power discretesBack-end(2) Kaohsiung, Taiwan 100% — — Leadframe-based packages and ballgrid arraysBangkok, Thailand 100% — — Low-pin count leadframesGuangdong, China 100% — — Discrete devicesSeremban, Malaysia 100% — — Discrete devicesCabuyao, Philippines 100% — — Power discretes, sensors and RFmodules processes (1)Joint venture with TSMC; we are entitled to 60% of the joint venture’s annual capacity.(2)In back-end manufacturing we entered into a joint venture with ASE in Suzhou (ASEN), in which we currently hold a 40% interest.We use a large number of raw materials in our front- and back-end manufacturing processes, including silicon wafers, chemicals, gases, lead frames,substrates, molding compounds and various types of precious and other metals. Our most important raw materials are the raw, or substrate, silicon wafers weuse to make our semiconductors. We purchase these wafers, which must meet exacting specifications, from a limited number of suppliers in the geographicregion in which our fabrication facilities are located. At our wholly owned fabrication plants, we use raw wafers ranging from 5 inches to 8 inches in size. OurSSMC wafer fab facility, which produces 8 inch wafers, is jointly owned by TSMC and ourselves. We are leveraging our experience in that fab facility inoptimizing our remaining wholly owned Nijmegen and Hamburg wafer fabs. Our other remaining fabs are small and are focused exclusively onmanufacturing power discretes. Emerging fabrication technologies employ larger wafer sizes and, accordingly, we expect that our production requirementswill in the future shift towards larger substrate wafers.We typically source our other raw materials in a similar fashion as our wafers, although our portfolio of suppliers is more diverse. Some of our suppliersprovide us with materials on a just-in-time basis, which permits us to reduce our procurement costs and the negative cash flow consequences of maintaininginventories, but exposes us to potential supply chain interruptions. We purchase most of our raw materials on the basis of fixed price contracts, but generallydo not commit ourselves to long-term purchase obligations, which permits us to renegotiate prices periodically.In addition, on a limited basis, we also produce and sell wafers and packaging services to our divested businesses in order to support their separationand, on a limited basis, their ongoing operations. As these divested businesses develop or acquire their own foundry and packaging capabilities, our revenuefrom these sources is declining. Our agreement with DSPG expired in December 2010 (although we had an ongoing obligation to supply services relating tocertain specialty processes until December 2014), the supplies to ST-Ericsson have effectively been terminated except for a small number of identifiedproducts. The former agreement with Trident Microsystems was converted into two separate agreements with Entropic and Sigma after Trident’s bankruptcy.The agreement with IDT is the result of the sale of our high-speed data-converter activity to IDT.Sales, Marketing and CustomersWe market our products worldwide to a variety of OEMs, ODMs, contract manufacturers and distributors. We generate demand for our products bydelivering High Performance Mixed Signal solutions to our customers, and supporting their system design-in activities by providing application architectureexpertise and local field application engineering support. We have 36 sales offices worldwide.Our sales and marketing teams are organized into six regions, which are EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa), the Americas, Japan, South Korea,Greater China and Asia Pacific. These sales regions are responsible for managing the customer relationships, design-in and promotion of new products. Weseek to further expand the presence of application engineers closely supporting our customers and to increase the amount of product development work thatwe can conduct jointly with our leading customers. Our web-based marketing tool is complementary to our direct customer technical support. 25Table of ContentsOur sales and marketing strategy focuses on deepening our relationship with our top OEMs and electronic manufacturing service customers anddistribution partners and becoming their preferred supplier, which we believe assists us in reducing sales volatility in challenging markets. We have long-standing customer relationships with most of our customers. Our 10 largest OEM end customers, some of whom are supplied by distributors, in alphabeticalorder, are Apple, Bosch, Continental, Gemalto, Giesecke/Devrient, Huawei, Kona, NSN, Panasonic and Samsung. When we target new customers, wegenerally focus on companies that are leaders in their markets either in terms of market share or leadership in driving innovation. We also have a strongposition with our distribution partners, being the number two semiconductor supplier (other than microprocessors) through distribution worldwide. Our 3largest distribution partners are Arrow, Avnet and WPG.Our revenue is the sum of our direct sales to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, plus our distributors’ resale of NXP products. Two distributorsaccounted for more than 10% of total 2014 revenue: WPG accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2014, 11% in 2013 and 12% in 2012. Avnet accounted for13% of our revenue in 2014. No other distributor accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in 2014, 2013 or 2012. No individual OEM for which we haddirect sales to accounted for more than 10% of revenue in 2014, 2013 or 2012.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.See the discussion set forth under Part I, Item 5C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.CompetitionWe compete with many different semiconductor companies, ranging from multinational companies with integrated research and development,manufacturing, sales and marketing organizations across a broad spectrum of product lines, to “fabless” semiconductor companies, to companies that arefocused on a single application market segment or standard product. Most of these competitors compete with us with respect to some, but not all, of ourbusinesses. None of our competitors have operations across all of our business lines.Our key competitors in alphabetical order include Analog Devices Inc., Atmel Corporation, Entropic Communications Inc., Fairchild SemiconductorsInternational Inc., Freescale, Infineon, Linear Technology Corporation, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., MaxLinear, Renesas, ON SemiconductorCorporation, Power Integrations Inc., ROHM Co., Ltd., Silicon Laboratories Inc., STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments Incorporated.The basis on which we compete varies across market segments and geographic regions. Our High Performance Mixed Signal businesses competeprimarily on the basis of our ability to timely develop new products and the underlying intellectual property and on meeting customer requirements in termsof cost, product features, quality, warranty and availability. In addition, our High Performance Mixed Signal system solutions businesses require in-depthknowledge of a given application market in order to develop robust system solutions and qualified customer support resources. In contrast, our StandardProducts business competes primarily on the basis of manufacturing and supply chain excellence and breadth of product portfolio.Legal ProceedingsThe information set forth under the “Litigation” caption of note 17 of our notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see Part I, Item 3D. RiskFactors above.Environmental RegulationThe information set forth under the “Environmental remediation” caption of note 17 of our notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included inPart III, Item 18 of this Report is incorporated herein by reference. For additional discussion of certain risks associated with environmental regulation, see PartI, Item 3D. Risk Factors above.C. Organizational StructureA list of our significant subsidiaries, including name, country of incorporation or residence and proportion of ownership interest and voting power isprovided as “Exhibit 21.1” under Part III, Item 19. Exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference. 26Table of ContentsCORPORATE STRUCTUREThe following chart reflects our corporate structure as of December 31, 2014. (1)For a more detailed description of our management equity stock option plan (“Management Equity Stock Option Plan”) and our Long-Term IncentivePlans as of 2010 see the discussion set forth under “Share Based Compensation Plans” contained in this Report in Part I, Item 6B. Compensation.(2)As of December 31, 2014, we had $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes outstanding.(3)As of December 31, 2014, no borrowings outstanding under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility.(4)As of December 31, 2014, we had $791 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Term Loans.(5)As of December 31, 2014, we had $2,250 million aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding. 27Table of ContentsD. Property, Plant and EquipmentNXP uses 65 sites in over 25 countries with approximately 27,900 full-time employees, 8.5 million square feet of total owned and leased buildingspace of which 5.5 million square feet is owned property.The following table sets out our principal real property holdings as of December 31, 2014: Location Use Owned/leased Building space(square feet) Eindhoven, the Netherlands Headquarters Leased 152,666 Hamburg, Germany Manufacturing Owned 844,899 Nijmegen, the Netherlands Manufacturing Owned 1,845,542 Singapore Manufacturing Owned 746,753 Bangkok, Thailand Manufacturing Owned 561,402 Cabuyao, Philippines Manufacturing Owned 444,080 Kaohsiung, Taiwan Manufacturing Owned 342,971 Manchester, United Kingdom Manufacturing Owned 273,266 Jilin, China Manufacturing Leased 138,856 Guangdong, China Manufacturing Leased 917,272 Seremban, Malaysia Manufacturing Owned 304,309 The following is a summary of the terms of our material lease agreements:Manufacturing in Singapore (SSMC) leases the land at 70 Pasir Ris Drive 1 in Singapore from Jurong Town Corporation for use as a manufacturingfacility. The lease commenced on June 1, 1999 for a term of 30 years at an annual rental rate of 1,408,694 Singapore Dollars ($1,113,737), which amount issubject to revision up to, but not exceeding, 5% of the yearly rent for the immediately preceding year, on the anniversary of the lease commencement date.The building has 746,753 square feet of floor space and is owned by us.We lease 917,272 square feet of manufacturing space through our subsidiary, NXP Semiconductors Guangdong Ltd., at Tian Mei High Tech, IndustrialPark, Huang Jiang Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong, China, from Huangjiang Investment Development Company (“Huangjiang”). The lease commencedon October 1, 2003 for a term of 13 years at an annual rental rate of RMB 811,467. Item 4A.Unresolved Staff CommentsNot applicable. Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsA. Operating ResultsEffect of Acquisition AccountingOur FormationOn September 29, 2006, Philips sold 80.1% of its semiconductor business to the Private Equity Consortium in a multi-step transaction. We refer to thisacquisition as our “Formation”.The Formation has been accounted for using the acquisition method. Accordingly, the $10,601 million purchase price has been “pushed down” withinthe NXP group and allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.The carrying value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as of the Formation date on September 29, 2006, amounted to $3,302 million.This resulted in an excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of $7,299 million. The excess of the purchase price was allocated to intangible assets,step-up on tangible assets and liabilities assumed, using the estimated fair value of these assets and liabilities.An amount of $3,096 million, being the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired, was allocated to goodwill.This goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually. 28Table of ContentsOther Significant AcquisitionsSince its Formation, NXP has acquired various companies and businesses. These acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method,and the respective purchase prices have been “pushed down” within the NXP group and allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilitiesassumed. This has also resulted in an allocation to goodwill for the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. Therelated goodwill is not amortized but included in the annual impairment test.Adjusting the carrying value of the assets acquired in the Formation and subsequent acquisitions to their fair value has had an adverse effect on ouroperating income for various reporting periods, stemming from amortization charges on intangible assets and higher depreciation charges on tangible fixedassets that are the result of acquisition accounting effects.The cumulative net effect resulting from the application of acquisition accounting is recorded in the financial statements with the term “PPA effect”.This effect is calculated taking into account the fact that any divestments and impairments in any particular reporting period reduce the amortization anddepreciation charges going forward. Impairment losses are not part of the PPA effect.Use of Certain Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNet debt is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total debt (short-term and long-term debt) after deduction of cash and cash equivalents.Management believes this measure is an appropriate reflection of our net leverage.We understand that, although net debt is used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluation of companies, this concept has limitations as ananalytical tool, and it should not be used as an alternative to any other measure in accordance with U.S. GAAP. 29Table of ContentsYear Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013Results of OperationsThe following table presents the composition of operating income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2014 2013 Revenue 5,647 4,815 % nominal growth 17.3 10.5 Gross profit 2,640 2,177 Research and development (763) (639) Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) (838) (896) Other income (expense) 10 9 Operating income 1,049 651 RevenueThe following table presents revenue by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Revenue % nominal growth Revenue % nominal growth High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) 4,208 19.1 3,533 18.7 Standard Products (“SP”) 1,275 11.4 1,145 (2.0) Corporate and Other 164 19.7 137 (36.0) Total 5,647 17.3 4,815 10.5 Revenue increased by $832 million to $5,647 million in 2014 compared to $4,815 million in 2013, a nominal increase of 17.3%. The increase wasdriven by strong growth in all of our business lines, highlighted by the growth in our HPMS segment.Our HPMS segment saw an increase in revenue of $675 million to $4,208 million in 2014 compared to $3,533 million in 2013. The increase wasprimarily driven by increased demand in all four business lines - Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing. Theincrease in Automotive was driven by our In-Vehicle Networking products. The increase in Identification was primarily driven by our embedded securesolutions associated with the ramp up of mobile transactions used in high-end smartphone and tablet platforms and continued demand for banking dual-interface cards. The increase in Infrastructure & Industrial was mainly in RF Power, in connection with the roll out of 4G base stations. The increase inPortable & Computing was driven by our microcontrollers and interface products.Revenue for our SP segment increased by $130 million to $1.275 million in 2014, compared to $1,145 million in 2013. The increase was primarily dueto increased demand in general applications, as a result of market share gains.Revenue for Corporate and Other amounted to $164 million in 2014, compared to $137 million in 2013 and mainly related to our manufacturingoperations.Gross ProfitThe following table presents gross profit by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Gross Profit % of segmentrevenue Gross Profit % of segmentrevenue HPMS 2,253 53.5 1,905 53.9 SP 382 30.0 285 24.9 Corporate and Other 5 3.0 (13) (9.5) Total 2,640 46.8 2,177 45.2 Gross profit in 2014 was $2,640 million, or 46.8% of revenue compared to $2,177 million, or 45.2% of revenue in 2013, an increase of $463 million.This increase was primarily attributable to market share gains in all business lines but primarily in our HPMS segment. Our gross profit rate, up 1.6 pointswhen compared to 2013, is heavily influenced by our product mix and the end customer mix in our business lines.Our HPMS segment had a gross profit of $2,253 million, or 53.5% of revenue in 2014, compared to $1,905 million, or 53.9% of revenue in 2013. Thedecrease in the gross profit percentage of 0.4 points was driven by changes in our product mix primarily in our Identification business line as well as newproduct introduction costs.Gross profit in our SP segment was $382 million, or 30.0% of revenue in 2014, compared to $285 million, or 24.9% of revenue in 2013. The increase inthe gross profit percentage of 5.1 points was driven by the benefit of market share gains, favorable pricing, product mix and improved manufacturing costs,partly from lower depreciation expenses. 30Table of ContentsOperating ExpensesThe following table presents operating expenses by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Operating expenses % of segmentrevenue Operating expenses % of segmentrevenue HPMS 1,278 30.4 1,193 33.8 SP 262 20.5 247 21.6 Corporate and Other 61 — 95 — Total 1,601 28.4 1,535 31.9 The following table below presents the composition of operating expenses by line item in the statement of operations. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2014 2013 Research and development 763 639 Selling, general and administrative 838 896 Operating expenses 1,601 1,535 Operating expenses were $1,601 million, or 28.4% of revenue in 2014, compared to $1,535 million, or 31.9% of revenue in 2013, an increase of $66million, or a decrease of 3.5 points as a percentage of revenue. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to higher share-based compensationcosts and an increased investment in research and development. The increase was offset by lower PPA expenses mainly due to certain intangible assetsbecoming fully amortized in the course of 2014. The decrease of operating expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily driven by our continued focuson cost controls in SG&A.In our HPMS segment, operating expenses amounted to $1,278 million, or 30.4% of revenue in 2014, compared to $1,193 million, or 33.8% of revenuein 2013. The increase was primarily driven by increased investment in research and development and increased share-based compensation costs.Operating expenses in our SP segment increased to $262 million, or 20.5% of revenue in 2014 compared to $247 million or 21.6% of revenue in 2013.The increase in operating expenses was mainly driven by higher share-based compensations costs.Operating expenses in Corporate and Other decreased by $34 million to $61 million in 2014 compared to $95 million in 2013. The decrease comparedto the prior year period was primarily due to lower restructuring and restructuring-related costs.Other Income (Expense)The following table presents other income (expense) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2014 2013 Other income (expense) 10 9 Other income (expense) reflects income of $10 million for 2014 compared to $9 million of income in 2013.Restructuring ChargesRestructuring and restructuring related costs amounted to $57 million in 2014 compared to $40 million in 2013.In 2014, we had restructuring charges, which related to a workforce reduction charge as a result of redundancy at our ICN 8 wafer fab in Nijmegen of$16 million and for our wafer fab in Hamburg of $5 million. The remaining restructuring and restructuring related costs were for the cumulative impact ofspecific targeted actions.In 2013, we had restructuring charges related mainly to a charge of $16 million associated with onerous contracts relating to leased office buildings inthe Netherlands and France. The remaining restructuring and restructuring related costs were for the cumulative impact of specific targeted actions. 31Table of ContentsOperating Income (Loss)The following table presents operating income (loss) by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Operating income(loss) % of segmentrevenue Operating income(loss) % of segmentrevenue HPMS 983 23.4 712 20.2 SP 120 9.4 39 3.4 Corporate and Other (54) — (100) — Total 1,049 18.6 651 13.5 The table below summarizes the PPA effects for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 on operating income (loss) by segment. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2014 2013 HPMS (84) (163) SP (58) (59) Corporate and Other (25) (24) Total (167) (246) The table below depicts the PPA effects within the Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. ($ in millions) 2014 2013 Gross profit (12) (14) Selling, general and administrative (152) (232) Other income (expense) (3) — Operating income (loss) (167) (246) “PPA effects” reflect the amortization in the period related to fair value adjustments resulting from acquisition accounting and other acquisitionadjustments charged to the income statement applied to the formation of NXP on September 29, 2006 and all subsequent acquisitions. The PPA effect on theCompany’s gross profit refers to additional depreciation charges on tangible fixed assets, resulting from the step-up in fair values. The amortization chargesrelated to long-lived intangible assets are reflected in general and administrative expenses.The decrease in PPA effects results in part from certain items becoming fully amortized during the course of 2014.Financial Income (Expense) For the years ended December 31, ($ in millions) 2014 2013 Interest income 3 3 Interest expense (145) (182) Foreign exchange rate results (246) 62 Net gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt (3) (114) Other (19) (43) Total (410) (274) Financial income (expense) was an expense of $410 million in 2014, compared to an expense of $274 million in 2013. Extinguishment of debt in 2014amounted to a loss of $3 million compared to a loss of $114 million in 2013. In 2014, financial income (expense) included a loss of $246 million as a resultof changes in foreign exchange rates mainly applicable to re-measurement of our U.S. dollar-denominated notes and short term loans, which reside in a eurofunctional currency entity, compared to a gain of $62 million in 2013. The net interest expense amounted to $142 million in 2014 compared to $179 millionin 2013. This was mainly attributable to a lower average interest rate on our long-term debt of 3.9% in 2014 compared to 5.2% in 2013.Benefit (Provision) for Income TaxesThe provision for income taxes was $40 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $20 million for the year ended December 31,2013, and the effective income tax rates were 6.3% and 5.3%, respectively. The effective income tax rates were impacted by foreign earnings taxed at lowerrates than the Netherlands statutory rate, tax incentives in certain jurisdictions, and the mix of income and losses in various jurisdictions. 32Table of ContentsResults Relating to Equity-accounted InvesteesResults relating to the equity-accounted investees amounted to a gain of $8 million in 2014, compared to a gain of $58 million in 2013. The gain in2013 primarily reflects a $46 million release of the contingent liability related to an arbitration commenced by ST. By ruling of April 2, 2013, the ICCarbitration tribunal dismissed all claims made by ST in this arbitration. No appeal is available to ST. Based on this award, the provision amounting to $46million, established in 2012 was released.Non-controlling InterestsNon-controlling interests are related to the third party share in the results of consolidated companies, predominantly SSMC. Their share of non-controlling interests amounted to a profit of $68 million in 2014, compared to a profit of $67 million in 2013. 33Table of ContentsYear Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012Results of OperationsThe following table presents the composition of operating income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2013 2012 Revenue 4,815 4,358 % nominal growth 10.5 3.9 Gross profit 2,177 1,988 Research and development (639) (628) Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) (896) (977) Other income (expense) 9 29 Operating income (loss) 651 412 RevenueThe following table presents revenue by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2013 2012 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Revenue % nominal growth Revenue % nominal growth High Performance Mixed Signal 3,533 18.7 2,976 12.2 Standard Products 1,145 (2.0) 1,168 (3.9) Corporate and Other 137 (36.0) 214 (34.2) Total 4,815 10.5 4,358 3.9 Revenue increased by $457 million to $4,815 million in 2013 compared to $4,358 million in 2012, a nominal increase of 10.5%. The increase wasdriven by strong growth in HPMS which was partly offset by a decline in revenue from our SP segment and from Corporate and Other.Our HPMS segment saw an increase in revenue of $557 million to $3,533 million in 2013 compared to $2,976 million in 2012. The increase wasprimarily driven by increased volumes in all four business lines (Automotive, Identification, Infrastructure & Industrial and Portable & Computing). Thehighest volume increase was associated with our banking business within our Identification portfolio and within our Portable & Computing portfolio.Revenue for our SP segment declined by $23 million to $1,145 million in 2013, compared to $1,168 million in 2012. The decline was primarily due tocompetitive pricing pressure in our protection and signal conditioning devices business.Revenue from Corporate and Other amounted to $137 million in 2013, compared to $214 million in 2012 and mainly related to our manufacturingoperations. The decline in revenue was primarily due to the expiration of contractual obligations to provide manufacturing services for previously divestedbusinesses. As these businesses develop or acquire their own foundry and packaging capabilities, our revenue from these sources will further decline.Gross ProfitThe following table presents gross profit by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. 2013 2012 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Gross Profit % of segmentrevenue Gross Profit % of segmentrevenue HPMS 1,905 53.9 1,656 55.6 SP 285 24.9 346 29.6 Corporate and Other (13) (9.5) (14) (6.5) Total 2,177 45.2 1,988 45.6 Gross profit in 2013 was $2,177 million, or 45.2% of revenue compared to $1,988 million, or 45.6% of revenue in 2012, an increase of $189 million.The increase in gross profit was mainly driven by higher revenue in the HPMS segment, partly offset by lower revenue due to competitive pricing pressure inour SP segment and the absence of the favorable legal award recorded in the second quarter of 2012 that increased our margin percentage. We were awarded afavorable judgment involving a dispute over the collection of a receivable that we recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts that impacted costs ofrevenue in a prior year. The arbitration tribunal arrived at an award on April 5, 2012, in favor of NXP. No appeal was possible against the arbitration award. 34Table of ContentsFollowing this award, we reversed the allowance for doubtful accounts previously established, again impacting our gross margin, and the invoices underlyingthe outstanding accounts received were collected in May 2012.Our HPMS segment had a gross profit of $1,905 million, or 53.9% of revenue in 2013, compared to $1,656 million, or 55.6% of revenue in 2012. Theincrease in gross profit was primarily due to increased revenue. This was partly offset by the absence of the favorable legal award recorded in the secondquarter of 2012 and lower margins within our Identification portfolio.Gross profit in our SP segment was $285 million, or 24.9% of revenue in 2013, compared to $346 million, or 29.6% of revenue in 2012. The decreasein gross profit was mainly attributed to lower revenue due to competitive price pressure.Operating ExpensesThe following table presents operating expenses by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. 2013 2012 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Operating expenses % of segmentrevenue Operating expenses % of segmentrevenue HPMS 1,193 33.8 1,197 40.2 SP 247 21.6 260 22.3 Corporate and Other 95 — 148 — Total 1,535 31.9 1,605 36.8 The following table below presents the composition of operating expenses by line item in the statement of operations. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2013 2012 Research and development 639 628 Selling, general and administrative 896 977 Operating expenses 1,535 1,605 Operating expenses were $1,535 million, or 31.9% of revenue in 2013, compared to $1,605 million, or 36.8% of revenue in 2012, a decrease of $70million. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to $73 million lower restructuring and restructuring related costs, $15 million lower IT systemsreorganization costs, the absence of operating expenses associated with the divestment of our high speed data converter business that was sold in 2012 andcost savings associated with the restructuring activities. Also the PPA expenses decreased by $21 million mainly due to part of the intangible assets beingfully amortized in the course of 2013. These decreases were partly offset by an increase of $30 million in share-based compensation costs and increasedinvestments in research and development costs within our Identification business.In our HPMS segment, operating expenses amounted to $1,193 million, or 33.8% of revenue in 2013, compared to $1,197 million, or 40.2% of revenuein 2012. The slight decrease was primarily driven by $24 million lower restructuring and restructuring related costs, the absence of operating expenseassociated with the divestment of our data converter business in 2012 and the current period cost savings associated with the restructuring activities. Thesedecreases were partly offset by $26 million higher share-based compensation costs and increased investments in research and development costs within ourIdentification business.Operating expenses in our SP segment decreased by $13 million to $247 million, or 21.6% of revenue in 2013 compared to $260 million or 22.3% ofrevenue in 2012. The decrease in operating expenses was mainly driven by the current period cost savings associated with the restructuring activities, partlyoffset by $7 million higher share-based compensation costs.Operating expenses in Corporate and Other decreased by $53 million to $95 million in 2013 compared to $148 million in 2012. The strong decreasecompared to the prior year period was primarily due to $45 million lower restructuring and restructuring related costs and $15 million lower IT systemsreorganization costs.Other Income (Expense)The following table presents other income (expense) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2013 2012 Other income (expense) 9 29 Other income (expense) reflects income of $9 million for 2013 compared to $29 million of income in 2012. The decrease is primarily due to a gain of$19 million on the sale of our high speed data converter business during the third quarter of 2012. 35Table of ContentsRestructuring ChargesNet restructuring and restructuring related costs that affected our operating income amounted to $40 million in 2013 compared to $111 million in2012.In 2013, we had net restructuring charges of $6 million, recorded in the liabilities, which related mainly to a charge of $16 million associated withonerous contracts relating to leased office buildings in the Netherlands and France, as part of the OPEX Reduction Program, partly offset by some releasesrelated to previous restructuring programs. Furthermore $34 million of restructuring costs were directly charged to our operating income.In 2012, we had net restructuring charges of $99 million, recorded in the liabilities, which were mainly associated with a restructuring initiative duringthe fourth quarter of 2012, designed to improve operational efficiency and to competitively position the company for sustainable growth. In addition, weincurred $12 million of restructuring related costs in 2012 which were directly charged to our operating income. For additional information, see note 5 to theConsolidated Financial Statements included in Part III, Item 18.Operating Income (Loss)The following table presents operating income (loss) by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. 2013 2012 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Operating income(loss) % of segmentrevenue Operating income(loss) % of segmentrevenue HPMS 712 20.2 479 16.1 SP 39 3.4 89 7.6 Corporate and Other (100) — (156) — Total 651 13.5 412 9.5 The table below summarizes the PPA effects for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 on operating income (loss) by segment. ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2013 2012 HPMS (163) (190) SP (59) (60) Corporate and Other (24) (23) Total (246) (273) The table below depicts the PPA effects within the Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. For the years ended December 31, ($ in millions) 2013 2012 Gross profit (14) (20) Selling, general and administrative (232) (253) Operating income (loss) (246) (273) “PPA effects” reflect the amortization in the period related to fair value adjustments resulting from acquisition accounting and other acquisitionadjustments charged to the income statement applied to the formation of NXP on September 29, 2006 and all subsequent acquisitions. The PPA effect on theCompany’s gross profit refers to additional depreciation charges on tangible fixed assets, resulting from the step-up in fair values. The amortization chargesrelated to long-lived intangible assets are reflected in general and administrative expenses.The decrease in PPA effects results in part from the PPA being fully amortized in the course of 2013. 36Table of ContentsFinancial Income (Expense) For the years ended December 31, ($ in millions) 2013 2012 Interest income 3 4 Interest expense (182) (270) Foreign exchange rate results 62 28 Net gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt (114) (161) Other (43) (38) Total (274) (437) Financial income (expense) (including the extinguishment of debt) was an expense of $274 million in 2013, compared to an expense of $437 millionin 2012. Extinguishment of debt in 2013 amounted to a loss of $114 million compared to a loss of $161 million in 2012. In 2013, financial income (expense)included a gain of $62 million as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates mainly applicable to re-measurement of our U.S. dollar-denominated notes andshort term loans, which reside in a euro functional currency entity, compared to a gain of $28 million in 2012. The net interest expense amounted to $179million in 2013 compared to $266 million in 2012. This mainly related to a lower average interest percentage of 5.2% and 7.2%, respectively and loweraverage debt outstanding of $3.4 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively in 2013 compared to 2012.Benefit (Provision) for Income TaxesThe provision for income taxes was $20 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012,and the effective income tax rates were positive 5.3% and negative 4.0%, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,2013 compared to the same period in the previous year was primarily due to the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which theCompany operates including jurisdictions where a full valuation allowance was recognized and in addition the year 2013 included more benefits for theeffect of tax incentives in certain jurisdictions.Results Relating to Equity-accounted InvesteesResults relating to the equity-accounted investees amounted to a gain of $58 million in 2013, compared to a loss of $27 million in 2012. The gain in2013 primarily reflects a $46 million release of the contingent liability related to an arbitration commenced by STMicroelectronics (ST). By ruling of April 2,2013, the ICC arbitration tribunal dismissed all claims made by ST in this arbitration. No appeal is available to ST. Based on this award, the provisionamounting to $46 million, established in 2012 was released. In 2012, a loss of $46 million related to extra provisions for the above mentioned legal claim ofST and a gain of $12 million related to a partial recovery of our equity investment in Trident are included.Non-controlling InterestsNon-controlling interests are related to the third party share in the results of consolidated companies, predominantly SSMC. Their share of non-controlling interests amounted to a profit of $67 million in 2013, compared to a profit of $63 million in 2012.B. Liquidity and Capital ResourcesLiquidity and Capital ResourcesAt the end of 2014 our cash balance was $1,185 million, an increase of $515 million compared to prior year. Taking into account the availableundrawn amount of the Secured Revolving Credit Facility, we had access to $1,938 million of liquidity as of December 31, 2014.Our capital expenditures were $329 million in 2014, compared to $215 million in 2013.The total amount of cash used for financing activities amounted to $554 million.In November 2014, we issued $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of cash convertible senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 Cash ConvertibleSenior Notes”). The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.00% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1of each year, beginning on June 1, 2015. The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes will mature on December 1, 2019. In connection with the pricing of the2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, NXP entered into separate privately negotiated cash convertible note hedge and warrant transactions withcounterparties that include the initial purchasers of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes or their respective affiliates (the “hedge counterparties”). Thecash convertible note hedge transactions will be cash settled upon exercise and are expected generally to offset any cash payments NXP is required to makein excess of the principal amount of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes upon conversion. The warrant transactions will be net share settled uponexercise and could therefore have a dilutive effect with respect to NXP’s common stock to the extent that the market price per share of NXP’s common stockexceeds the strike price of the warrants. The strike price of the warrant transactions will initially be approximately $133.32 per share, which represents apremium of approximately 75% over the 37Table of Contentslast reported sale price of NXP’s common stock on the closing date, November 24, 2014, and is subject to certain adjustments under the terms of the warranttransactions.At the end of 2014, we had an undrawn availability of $753 million remaining under our Secured Revolving Credit Facility, net of outstanding bankguarantees, based on the end of year exchange rate. However, the amount of this availability varies with fluctuations between the euro and the U.S. dollar asthe total amount of the facility, €620 million, is denominated in euro and the amounts drawn are denominated in U.S. dollars.For the year ended December 31, 2014, we incurred total net interest expense of $142 million compared to $179 million during 2013. The weightedaverage interest rates on our debt instruments as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were 3.3% and 4.3%, respectively.As of December 31, 2014, our cash balance was $1,185 million, of which $426 million was held by SSMC, our consolidated joint venture companywith TSMC. Under the terms of our joint venture agreement with TSMC, a portion of this cash can be distributed by way of a dividend to us, but 38.8% of thedividend will be paid to our joint venture partner. In 2014, a dividend of $130 million was distributed, of which $50 million was distributed to the jointventure partner.We repurchased $1,435 million of our common stock pursuant to our share buyback program during 2014 at a weighted average price of $61.73 pershare.Our sources of liquidity include cash on hand, cash flow from operations and amounts available under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility. Webelieve that, based on our current level of operations as reflected in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, these sources of liquiditywill be sufficient to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and debt service for at least the next twelve months.Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject toprevailing economic and competitive conditions. In the future, we may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient topermit us to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or we maynot have enough capacity under our Secured Revolving Credit Facility, or from other sources in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness,including the Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the Term Loans and the Unsecured Notes or to fund our other liquidity needs, including working capitaland capital expenditure requirements. In any such case, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additionalcapital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. See Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors.Cash Flow from Operating ActivitiesIn 2014 our operating activities provided $1,468 million in cash. This was primarily the result of net income of $607 million and changes in operatingassets and liabilities of $96 million. The net income includes non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, of $765 million.In 2013 our operating activities provided $891 million in cash. This was primarily the result of net income of $415 million and changes in operatingassets and liabilities of $120 million. The net income includes non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, of $596 million.Operating activities provided $722 million in cash in 2012. This was primarily the result of a net loss of $52 million and changes in operating assetsand liabilities of $28 million. The net income includes non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, of $747 million.Cash Flow from Investing ActivitiesNet cash used for investing activities amounted to $387 million in 2014 and principally consisted of cash outflows for capital expenditures of $329million and $36 million for the purchase of identified intangible assets, mainly related to the purchase of software.Net cash used for investing activities amounted to $240 million in 2013 and principally consisted of cash outflows for capital expenditures of $215million and $35 million for the purchase of identified intangible assets, mainly related to the purchase of software.Investing activities in 2012 used $243 million of net cash in 2012. This net use of cash primarily included $251 million for capital expenditures, and$29 million for the purchase of identified intangible assets, mainly related to the purchase of software, partially offset by proceeds from sale of interests in ourdata converters business of $26 million and $12 million of proceeds related to the partial recovery of our equity investments in Trident.Cash Flow from Financing ActivitiesNet cash used for financing activities was $554 million in 2014, $598 million in 2013 and $574 million in 2012. The cash flows related to financingtransactions in 2014, 2013 and 2012 are primarily related to the financing activities described below under the captions 2014 Financing Activities, 2013Financing Activities and 2012 Financing Activities, respectively. 38Table of ContentsIn addition to the financing activities described below, net cash used for financing activities by year included: Year ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (50) (48) (40) Purchase of non-controlling interest shares — (12) — Cash proceeds from exercise of stock options 145 177 14 Purchase of treasury shares (1,435) (405) (40) Cash paid for Notes hedge derivatives (208) — — Proceeds from the sale of warrants 134 — — Net (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit facility (150) (80) 230 2014 Financing Activities2017 Term LoanOn February 18, 2014, our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC entered into a new $400 million aggregate principal amount SeniorSecured Term Loan Facility due March 4, 2017 (the “2017 Term Loan”). Concurrently, NXP repaid the $486 million principal amount Senior Secured TermLoan Facility due March 4, 2017. A $100 million draw-down under our existing Revolving Credit Facility and approximately $5 million of cash on handwere used to settle the combined transactions, as well as pay the related call premium of $5 million and accrued interest of $4 million.2019 Cash Convertible Senior NotesOn November 24, 2014, NXP issued 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1,150 million, which matureDecember 1, 2019. The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes were issued at par and were recorded at their fair value of $1,150 million on the accompanyingConsolidated Balance Sheet. We used the net proceeds of $1,134 million (i) to fund the cost of entering into the cash convertible note hedge transactions (thecost of which were partially offset by the proceeds that NXP received from entering into warrant transactions) with certain hedge counterparties, as describedbelow, (ii) to repay up to €225 million in respect of intercompany loans to our subsidiary NXP B.V., (iii) to fund the repurchase of $150 million of ourcommon stock in the offering in privately negotiated transactions through one of the initial purchasers or its affiliate conducted concurrently with the pricingof the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, and (iv) for general corporate purposes, including additional share repurchases and potential acquisitions.In connection with the pricing of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, NXP entered into separate privately negotiated cash convertible note hedgeand warrant transactions with counterparties that include the initial purchasers of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes or their respective affiliates (the“hedge counterparties”). The cash convertible note hedge transactions will be cash settled upon exercise and are expected generally to offset any cashpayments NXP is required to make in excess of the principal amount of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes upon conversion. The warrant transactionswill be net share settled upon exercise and could therefore have a dilutive effect with respect to NXP’s common stock to the extent that the market price pershare of NXP’s common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants. The strike price of the warrant transactions will initially be approximately $133.32 pershare, which represents a premium of approximately 75% over the last reported sale price of NXP’s common stock on November 24, 2014, and is subject tocertain adjustments under the terms of the warrant transactions.2013 Financing Activities2021 Senior Unsecured NotesOn February 14, 2013 our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC issued U.S. dollar-denominated 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes withan aggregate principal amount of $500 million, which mature February 15, 2021 (the “2021 Unsecured Notes”). The 2021 Unsecured Notes were issued at parand were recorded at their fair value of $500 million on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. On March 4, 2013, we used the net proceeds of $495million together with approximately $14 million of cash on hand to fully repay the outstanding principal amount of $494 million under the Senior SecuredTerm Loan Facility due April 3, 2017, as well as to pay related call premiums of $10 million and accrued interest of $5 million.2023 Senior Unsecured NotesOn March 12, 2013 our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC issued U.S. dollar-denominated 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes with anaggregate principal amount of $500 million, which mature March 15, 2023 (the “2023 Unsecured Notes”). The 2023 Unsecured Notes were issued at par andwere recorded at their fair value of $500 million on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. On March 12, 2013, we used the net proceeds of $495million to fully repay the $471 million principal amount Senior Secured Term Loan Facility due March 19, 2019, to pay related call premiums of $5 millionand accrued interest of $5 million. We used the balance of $14 million for general corporate purposes.2018 Senior Unsecured NotesOn May 20, 2013 our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC issued U.S. dollar-denominated 3.75% Senior Unsecured Notes with anaggregate principal amount of $750 million, which mature June 1, 2018 (the “2018 Unsecured Notes”). 39Table of ContentsThe 2018 Unsecured Notes were issued at par and were recorded at their fair value of $750 million on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. OnMay 21, 2013, we used the net proceeds of $743 million together with cash on hand to redeem €142 million aggregate principal amount of Senior SecuredFloating Rate Notes due October 2013 for $184 million, to repurchase $58 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes dueOctober 2013, and to redeem $615 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due November 2016, as well as to pay relatedcall premiums of $16 million and accrued interest of $2 million.2016 Senior Unsecured NotesOn September 24, 2013 our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC issued U.S. dollar-denominated 3.5% Senior Unsecured Notes withan aggregate principal amount of $500 million, which mature September 15, 2016 (the “2016 Unsecured Notes”, and together with the 2021 UnsecuredNotes, the 2023 Unsecured Notes and the 2018 Unsecured Notes, the “Unsecured Notes”, and together with the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, the“Notes”). The 2016 Unsecured Notes were issued at par and were recorded at their fair value of $500 million on the accompanying Consolidated BalanceSheet. On October 15, 2013, we used the net proceeds of $495 million to redeem $422 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes dueAugust 2018, as well as to pay related call premiums of $51 million and accrued interest of $8 million. We used the balance of $14 million for generalcorporate purposes.2020 Term LoanOn November 27, 2013 our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC entered into a new $400 million aggregate principal amount SeniorSecured Term Loan Facility due January 11, 2020 (the “2020 Term Loan”, and together with the 2017 Term Loan, the “Term Loans”). Concurrently, NXPrepaid the $496 million principal amount Senior Secured Term Loan Facility due January 11, 2020. A $100 million draw-down under our existing RevolvingCredit Facility and approximately $6 million of cash on hand were used to settle the combined transactions, as well as pay the related call premium of $5million and accrued interest of $5 million. The exchange of the First 2020 Term Loan for the 2020 Term Loan was a non-cash financing transaction.2012 Financing Activities2019 Term LoanOn February 16, 2012, our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC entered into a new $475 million aggregate principal amount SeniorSecured Term Loan Facility due March 19, 2019. The Term Loan was issued with an original issue discount at 98.5% of par and was recorded at its fair valueof $468 million on the accompanying Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet. The net proceeds of this issuance, together with a $330 million draw-down underour Secured Revolving Credit Facility and approximately $52 million of cash on hand, were used to redeem $510 million aggregate principal amount of theU.S. dollar-denominated 9.5% Senior Notes due October 2015, €203 million aggregate principal amount of the euro-denominated 8 5/8% Senior Notes dueOctober 2015, and pay related call premiums of $36 million and accrued interest of $31 million. The 2019 Term Loan was fully repaid on March 12, 2013.Secured Revolving Credit FacilityOn April 27, 2012, NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC concluded the Secured Revolving Credit Facility under which it borrowed $330 million to settleand close its existing revolving credit facility (the “Initial Secured Revolving Credit Facility”). It subsequently reduced its outstanding drawings to $230million as of December 31, 2012.On October 24, 2012, NXP B.V., NXP Funding LLC and certain participating banks entered into an incremental joinder agreement to increase theborrowing capacity under the Initial Secured Revolving Credit Facility subject to an effective date of October 29, 2012 (the “Incremental JoinderAgreement”, and together with the Initial Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the “Secured Revolving Credit Facility”). The borrowing capacity under theSecured Revolving Credit Facility was increased by €120 million (approximately $155 million) up to a total amount of €620 million ($818 million). TheSecured Revolving Credit Facility will expire on March 1, 2017 and will be used for general corporate purposes.2013 Super Priority NotesDuring 2012, NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC redeemed all euro-denominated 2013 Super Priority Notes, which had an aggregate principal amount of€29 million and all U.S. dollar-denominated 2013 Super Priority Notes, which had an aggregate principal amount of $221 million.First 2020 Term LoanOn December 10, 2012, our subsidiary, NXP B.V. together with NXP Funding LLC entered into a new $500 million aggregate principal amount SeniorSecured Term Loan Facility due January 11, 2020 ( the “First 2020 Term Loan”). The First 2020 Term Loan was issued with an original issue discount at99.5% of par and was recorded at its fair value of $498 million on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The net proceeds of this issuance, togetherwith a $100 million draw-down under our existing revolving credit facility and approximately $12 million of cash on hand, were used to settle our tenderoffer for $500 million of the U.S. dollar-denominated 9.75% Senior Notes due 2018, and pay related call premiums of $86 million, accrued interest of $18million and debt issuance costs of $6 million. 40Table of ContentsCash Flow from Discontinued OperationsNet cash used for discontinued operations in 2012 was $45 million reflecting a payment of $45 million to Dover Corporation related to outstandingcommitments on the sale of the Sound Solution business.Debt PositionShort-term DebtIn 2014, our short-term debt of $20 million included other short-term bank borrowings of $8 million, related to a local bank loan in China.In 2013, our short-term debt of $40 million included other short-term bank borrowings of $24 million, related to a local bank loan in China.Long-term DebtAs of December 31, 2014, we had outstanding debt of: ($ in millions) December 31,2013 Accrual of DebtDiscount Debt Exchanges/Repurchases/ NewBorrowings Other(9) December 31,2014 U.S. dollar-denominated secured term credit agreementdue March 2017 (1) — 395 (4) 391 U.S. dollar-denominated secured term credit agreementdue April 2017 (2) 480 (480) — U.S. dollar-denominated secured term credit agreementdue April 2020 (3) 394 (4) 390 U.S. dollar-denominated 3.5% senior unsecured notes dueSeptember 2016(4) 500 500 U.S. dollar-denominated 3.75% senior unsecured notesdue June 2018(5) 750 750 U.S. dollar-denominated 5.75% senior unsecured notesdue February 2021(6) 500 500 U.S. dollar-denominated 5.75% senior unsecured notesdue March 2023(7) 500 500 U.S. dollar-denominated 1.00% cash convertible seniornotes due December 2019(8) — (205) 1,150 945 3,124 (205) 1,061 (4) 3,976 Secured Revolving Credit Facility 150 (150) — Other long-term debt 7 (4) 3 Total long-term debt 3,281 (205) 911 (8) 3,979 (1)On February 18, 2014, we entered into a new 2017 Term Loan for an aggregate principal amount of $400 million at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus 2%with a floor of 0.75%.(2)On March 4, 2011, we entered into the First 2017 Term Loan for an initial principal amount of $500 million at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus 3.25%with a floor of 1.25%.(3)On November 27, 2013, we entered into the 2020 Term Loan for an initial principal amount of $400 million at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus 2.5%with a floor of 0.75%.(4)On September 24, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 3.5% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2016.(5)On May 20, 2013, we issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2018.(6)On February 14, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2021.(7)On March 15, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023.(8)On November 24, 2014, we issued $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of 1.00% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2019.(9)Other mainly concerns the reclassification of the current portion of long-term debt.We may from time to time continue to seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges, in open marketpurchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. See the discussion in the “Recent Developments” section in Part I, Item 5A. Operating Results andPart II, Item 10C. Material Contracts.Certain Terms of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior NotesWe have issued $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, which bear interest at 1.00% per annum andmature on December 1, 2019, unless earlier converted, repurchased or redeemed. The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes pay interest on June 1 andDecember 1 of each year, beginning on June 1, 2015. The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of NXP Semiconductor N.V.and will be settled solely in cash upon conversion. We may not redeem the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes prior to their maturity date other thanfollowing the occurrence of certain tax law changes as set forth in the indenture governing the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible NotesIndenture”). Upon the 41Table of Contentsoccurrence of certain events which constitute a “fundamental change” under the Convertible Notes Indenture, such as certain change of control, the holdersof 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes at a price equal to 100%of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest.Prior to September 1, 2019, holders may convert their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes only upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in theConvertible Notes Indentures. On or after September 1, 2019 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding thematurity date, holders may, at their option, convert their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes solely into cash at any time.Upon conversion, in lieu of receiving any shares of our common stock, a holder will receive, per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Cash ConvertibleSenior Notes being converted, an amount in cash equal to the settlement amount, determined as described in the Convertible Notes Indenture. Theconversion rate will initially be 9.7236 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately$102.84 per share). The conversion rate for the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments and will also beadjusted for any fundamental change or tax redemption, each as described in the Convertible Notes Indenture.Concurrently with the issuance of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into cash convertible note hedge and warrant transactions. Forfurther information on the cash convertible note hedge and warrant transactions, please see “—Financial Instruments.”Certain Terms and Covenants of the Term Loans and Secured Revolving Credit FacilityThe Term Loans are fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally, on a senior secured basis by certain of our current and future materialwholly owned subsidiaries.Pursuant to various security documents related to the Term Loans and the Secured Revolving Credit Facility, we have granted liens and securityinterests over substantially all of our assets, including the assets of our material wholly owned subsidiaries.Cash Convertible Note Hedge Transactions and Warrant TransactionsOn November 24, 2014 and November 25, 2014, in connection with our issuances of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into cashconvertible note hedge transactions with affiliates of the initial purchasers of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes (in such capacity, the “OptionCounterparties”) to offset any cash payment we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes.In these transactions, we paid approximately $208 million for call options relating to, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately11.18 million shares of NXP’s common stock (which is equal to the number of shares that initially underlie the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes), with astrike price of approximately $102.84 per share. The Option Counterparties or their respective affiliates may enter into, or unwind, various over-the-counterderivatives and/or purchase or sell our common stock in open market and/or privately negotiated transactions prior to maturity of the 2019 Cash ConvertibleSenior Notes, including during any observation period for the settlement of conversions of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, or upon any repurchaseof the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes by us, which could adversely impact the price of our common stock and of the 2019 Cash Convertible SeniorNotes.Separately, we sold warrants to the Option Counterparties for $134 million giving them the right to purchase from us, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 11.18 million shares of NXP’s common stock, with a strike price of $133.32 per share. The warrants will have a dilutiveeffect with respect to our common stock to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants on or priorto the expiration date of the warrants.Critical Accounting EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires our management to make judgments,assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Our management bases itsestimates and judgments on historical experience, current economic and industry conditions and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonableunder the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.The accounting policies where management believes the nature of the estimates or assumptions involved is material due to the levels of subjectivityand judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change are as follows: Inventories, Goodwill,Impairment or disposal of identified intangible assets and tangible fixed assets, Revenue recognition, Income taxes, Postretirement benefits, Share-basedcompensation and Litigation and claims.If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financialcondition and liquidity. 42Table of ContentsC. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.Research and DevelopmentWe believe that our future success depends on our ability to both improve our existing products and to develop new products for both existing andnew markets. We direct our research and development efforts largely to the development of new High Performance Mixed Signal semiconductor solutionswhere we see significant opportunities for growth. We target applications that require stringent overall system and subsystem performance. As new andchallenging applications proliferate, we believe that many of these applications will benefit from our solutions. We have assembled a team of highly skilledsemiconductor and embedded software design engineers with expertise in RF, analog, power management, interface, security and digital processing. As ofDecember 31, 2014, we had approximately 3,447 employees in research and development, of which approximately 3,142 support our High PerformanceMixed Signal businesses and approximately 305 support our Standard Products businesses. Our engineering design teams are located in India (Bangalore),China (Shanghai, Beijing), the United States (San Jose, Chandler), France (Caen, Suresnes), Germany (Hamburg, Dresden), Austria (Gratkorn), the Netherlands(Nijmegen, Eindhoven), Hong Kong, Singapore, the United Kingdom (Manchester, Sheffield), Switzerland (Zurich) and Belgium (Leuven). Our research anddevelopment expenses were $763 million in 2014 (of which 87% related to our High Performance Mixed Signal businesses) and $639 million in 2013.To outpace market growth we invest in research and development to extend or create leading market positions, with an emphasis on fast growingsizable market segments, such as identification and smart mobile, and emerging markets, such as the Internet of Things and automotive solid state lighting.Finally, we invest around 3% of our total research and development expenditures in research activities that develop fundamental new technologies orproduct categories that could contribute significantly to our company growth in the future.We annually perform a fundamental review of our business portfolio and our related new product and technology development opportunities in orderto decide on changes in the allocation of our research and development resources. For products targeting established markets, we evaluate our research anddevelopment expenditures based on clear business need and risk assessments. For break-through technologies and new market opportunities, we look at thestrategic fit and synergies with the rest of our portfolio and the size of the potential addressable market. Overall, we allocate our research and development tomaintain a healthy mix of emerging growth and mature businesses.Intellectual PropertyThe creation and use of intellectual property is a key aspect of our strategy to differentiate ourselves in the marketplace. We seek to protect ourproprietary technologies by obtaining patents, trademarks, domain names, retaining trade secrets and defending, enforcing and utilizing our intellectualproperty rights, where appropriate. We believe this strategy allows us to preserve the advantages of our products and technologies, and helps us to improvethe return on our investment in research and development. Our portfolio of approximately 9,000 patents and patent applications, as well as our access viaroyalty-free licenses to a significant number of patents held by Philips, give us the benefit of a large patent portfolio positions in the High PerformanceMixed Signal and Standard Products markets. To protect confidential technical information that is not subject to patent protection, we rely on trade secretlaw and frequently enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, customers, suppliers and partners. In situations where we believe that a thirdparty has infringed on our intellectual property, we enforce our rights through all available legal means to the extent that we determine the benefits of suchactions to outweigh any costs involved.We have engaged in licensing, selling and other activities aimed at generating income and other benefits from our intellectual property assets. Webelieve that there is an opportunity to generate additional income and other benefits from our intellectual property assets. This is a process that will take timebefore meaningful benefits can be reaped but the program has been further developed and is well underway.While our patents and trade secrets constitute valuable assets, we do not view any one of them as being material to our operations as a whole. Instead,we believe it is the combination of our patents and trade secrets that creates an advantage for our business.In addition to our own patents and trade secrets, we have entered into licensing, broad-scope cross licensing and other agreements authorizing us to usepatents, trade secrets, confidential technical information, software and related technology owned by third parties and/or operate within the scope of patentsowned by third parties. We are party to technology partnerships, with universities across the world, particularly in Europe, China, Singapore and India, withapplication and infrastructure owners.We own a number of trademarks and, where we consider it desirable, we develop names for our new products and secure trademark protection throughenforcement for them.D. Trend InformationWithin the overall umbrella of Secure Connections for a Smarter World, NXP addresses four key macro growth trends: Intelligent Devices, Mobility,Hyper-connectivity and Security, that drive applications such as the Connected Car, Portable & Wearable and the Internet of Things, with Security being arequirement across all applications. Our innovative solutions are used in a wide range of applications. Many electronic payment and government ID servicesare enabled by our secure identification solutions and with the transition of those services to new form factors in secure connected devices, there is strongmarket demand for embedded security solutions such as mobile payment, cyber-security and authentication. Fast innovation in smart phones & tablets 43Table of Contentsdrives demand for our secure interface and power solutions while always-on requirements in secure connected devices further drive demand for our advancedmobile audio, sensing and connectivity solutions, with advanced magnetic induction radios for implantable medical devices such as hearing aids as anexample. Cities, buildings and industrial production systems all want to become smart, connected and secure; they provide fertile new markets for our smartgrid, intelligent logistics and industrial security solutions. Our new high-performance RF power amplifier products allow wireless network operators toexpand network capacity with fewer base stations. The automotive industry brings fast trends in advanced driver assistance, seamless consumer electronicsexperience and energy efficiency, and we respond to those by delivering solutions for secure car access, car entertainment and in-vehicle networking. Inaddition, we leverage our core competencies to innovate in the transition to highly and eventually fully automated cars with ground breaking solutions insecure vehicle-to-infrastructure & vehicle-to-vehicle and radar.We believe that we are strategically positioned to capture rapid growth in emerging markets through our strong position in Asia Pacific (excludingJapan), which represented 68% of our revenue in 2014, compared to 64% of our revenue in 2013. In particular, Greater China represented 51% of our revenuein 2014, compared to 45% of our revenue in 2013.E. Off-balance Sheet ArrangementsAs of December 31, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual ObligationsPresented below is a summary of our contractual obligations as at December 31, 2014 ($ in millions) Total 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 andthereafter Long-term debt 3,042 11 508(1) 391(2) 754(3) 3 1,375(4) 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes (5) 945 — — — — 945 — Capital lease obligations 4 1 2 1 — — — Short-term debt 8 8 — — — — — Operating leases 130 42 27 14 12 13 22 Interest on the notes (6) 690 140 134 113 97 81 125 Software licences (7) 49 19 16 14 — — — Long-term purchase contracts 336 127 172 25 6 6 — Total contractual cash obligations (6)(8) 5,204 348 859 558 869 1,048 1,522 (1)On September 24, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 3.5% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2016.(2)On February 18, 2014, we entered into a new 2017 Term Loan with an initial principal amount of $400 million at a rate of interest of LIBOR plus 2%with a floor of 0.75%.(3)On May 20, 2013, we issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2018.(4)On November 27, 2013, we entered into a new $400 million aggregate principal amount senior secured term loan facility due January 11, 2020 at a rateof interest of LIBOR plus 2.5% with a floor of 0.75%. On February 14, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% SeniorUnsecured Notes due 2021 and on March 15, 2013, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023.(5)On November 24, 2014, we issued $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of 1.00% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2019.(6)The interest on the notes was determined on the basis of LIBOR interest rates for floating rate instruments and on the basis of contractual agreedinterest rates for other debt instruments.(7)As of December 31, 2014, we had $49 million of non-cancellable license obligations for software.(8)Certain of these obligations are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, and have been translated from foreign currencies into U.S. dollarsbased on an aggregate average rate of $1.3285 per €1.00, in effect at December 31, 2014. As a result, the actual payments will vary based on anychange in exchange rate.Our debt instruments had accrued interest of $28 million as of December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013: $27 million).In addition to the above obligations, we enter into a variety of agreements in the normal course of business, containing provisions that certain penaltiesmay be charged if we do not fulfill our commitments. It is not possible to predict with certainty the maximum potential amount of future payments underthese or similar provisions due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular case.Historically, payments pursuant to such provisions have not been material and we believe that any future payments required pursuant to such provisionswould not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. However, such payments may be material to our consolidated statement ofoperations for a specific period.We sponsor pension plans in many countries in accordance with legal requirements, customs and the local situation in the countries involved. Theseare defined-benefit pension plans, defined contribution pension plans and multi-employer plans. Contributions to funded pension plans are made asnecessary, to provide sufficient assets to meet future benefits payable to plan participants. These contributions are determined by various factors, includingfunded status, legal and tax considerations and local customs. We currently estimate contributions to funded pension plans will be $59 million in 2015,consisting of $4 million in employer contributions to defined-benefit pension plans and $55 million in employer contributions to defined-contributionpension plans and multi-employer plans. The expected cash outflows in 2015 and subsequent years are uncertain and may change as a consequence ofstatutory funding requirements as well as changes in actual versus currently assumed discount rates, estimations of compensation increases and returns onpension plan assets. 44Table of ContentsG. Safe HarborThis Annual Report includes forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “forecast”,“expect”, “intend”, “plan” and “project” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, our management or third parties, identify forward-looking statements.Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our business strategy, financial condition, results of operations and market data, as well as anyother statements that are not historical facts. These statements reflect beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by our management andinformation currently available to us. Although we believe that these beliefs and assumptions are reasonable, these statements are subject to numerousfactors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. These factors, risks anduncertainties expressly qualify all subsequent oral and written forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf and include, inaddition to those listed under Part I, Item 3D. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Report, the following: • market demand and semiconductor industry conditions; • our ability to successfully introduce new technologies and products; • the demand for the goods into which our products are incorporated; • our ability to generate sufficient cash, raise sufficient capital or refinance our debt at or before maturity to meet both our debt service and research anddevelopment and capital investment requirements; • our ability to accurately estimate demand and match our production capacity accordingly; • our ability to obtain supplies from third-party producers; • our access to production from third-party outsourcing partners, and any events that might affect their business or our relationship with them; • our ability to secure adequate and timely supply of equipment and materials from suppliers; • our ability to avoid operational problems and product defects and, if such issues were to arise, to rectify them quickly; • our ability to form strategic partnerships and joint ventures and successfully cooperate with our alliance partners; • our ability to win competitive bid selection processes; • our ability to develop products for use in our customers’ equipment and products; • our ability to successfully hire and retain key management and senior product engineers; and • our ability to maintain good relationships with our suppliers.We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements and disclaim any obligation to update our view of any risks oruncertainties described herein or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to the forward-looking statements made in this Report, except as requiredby law.In addition, this Report contains information concerning the semiconductor industry and business segments generally, which is forward-looking innature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which the semiconductor industry, our market and business segments will develop. Wehave based these assumptions on information currently available to us, including through the market research and industry reports referred to in this Report.Although we believe that this information is reliable, we have not independently verified and cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. If any one ormore of these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual market results may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact any suchdifferences may have on our business, if there are such differences, they could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financialcondition, and the trading price of our common stock. Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesA. Directors and Senior ManagementThe following description sets forth certain information about management and management-related matters. We have a one-tier board structure.Board of DirectorsSet forth below are the names, ages and positions as of December 31, 2014, of the persons who serve as members of our board of directors. Name Age PositionRichard L. Clemmer 63 Executive director, president and chief executive officerSir Peter Bonfield 70 Non-executive director and chairman of the boardJohannes P. Huth 54 Non-executive director and vice-chairman of the boardKenneth A. Goldman 65 Non-executive directorDr. Marion Helmes 49 Non-executive directorJosef Kaeser 57 Non-executive directorIan Loring 48 Non-executive directorEric Meurice 58 Non-executive directorJulie Southern 55 Non-executive directorRick Tsai 63 Non-executive director 45Table of Contents • Richard L. Clemmer (1951, American). Mr. Clemmer became executive director, president and chief executive officer on January 1, 2009. Prior tothat, from December 2007, Mr. Clemmer was a member of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. and a senior advisor of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Prior to joining NXP, he was the President and CEO of Agere Systems, served as Chairman of u-Nav Microelectronics Corporation, and held a five-yeartenure at Quantum Corporation where he was executive vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to that, Mr. Clemmer worked for TexasInstruments Incorporated as senior vice president and semiconductor group chief financial officer. Mr. Clemmer also serves on the board of NCRCorporation. • Sir Peter Bonfield CBE FREng (1944, British). Sir Peter has been appointed as a non-executive director and as the chairman of our board of directorsin August 2010. Prior to that, Sir Peter was the chairman of the supervisory board of NXP B.V. from September 29, 2006. Sir Peter served as chiefexecutive officer and chairman of the executive committee for British Telecom plc from 1996 to 2002 and prior to that was chairman and chiefexecutive officer of ICL plc (now Fujitsu Services Holdings Ltd.). Sir Peter also worked in the semiconductor industry during his tenure as a divisionaldirector at Texas Instruments Incorporated, for whom he held a variety of senior management positions around the world. Sir Peter currently holds non-executive directorships at Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, Mentor Graphics Corporationand Global Logic Inc. Sir Peter is Chair of Council and Senior Pro-Chancellor at Loughborough University, Senior Advisor to N M Rothschild inLondon and Board Mentor at CMi in Belgium. He is also Advisor to Longreach LLP in Hong Kong and NVP LLP in New Jersey. • Johannes P. Huth (1960, German). Mr. Huth has been appointed as a non-executive director and vice-chairman of our board of directors in August2010. Prior to that, Mr. Huth was a member and chairman of our supervisory board and a member and vice-chairman of NXP B.V.’s supervisory boardfrom September 29, 2006. Mr. Huth joined Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. LLP in May 1999 and is a Member of KKR and Head of KKR’s operations inEurope, the Middle East and Africa. He is also a member of the Firm’s Management Committee and several of the Firm’s Investment Committees. Priorto joining KKR, he was a member of the Management Committee of Investcorp and jointly responsible for Investcorp’s operations in Europe. From1986 to 1991, he worked at Salomon Brothers, where he was a Vice President in the Mergers and Acquisitions departments in London and New York.Mr. Huth currently is also a Member of the Supervisory Board of Kion, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of WMF, member of the Board of HerthaKGaA, and member of the Supervisory Board of GEG German Estate Group AG. He is the Chairman of the Trustees of Impetus – Private EquityFoundation, a charitable organization set up by the Private Equity industry focused on providing support to charities involved with young people notin education, employment or training. He is Vice-Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Design Museum, trustee of the Staedel Museum in Frankfurt, agovernor of the London School of Economics and trustee of The Education Endowment Foundation. He is a Visiting Fellow of Oxford University and aFellow of the Royal Society of Arts. He earned a BSc with Highest Honors from the London School of Economics and an MBA from the University ofChicago. • Kenneth A. Goldman (1949, American). Mr. Goldman has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective August 6,2010. Mr. Goldman is chief financial officer of Yahoo!, Inc responsible for Yahoo!’s global finance functions including financial planning andanalysis, controllership, tax, treasury and investor relations since October 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance andadministration, and chief financial officer of Fortinet, Inc, a provider of unified threat management solutions, from September 2007 to September 2012.From November 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Goldman served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Dexterra, Inc. From August 2000until March 2006, Mr. Goldman served as senior vice president, finance and administration, and chief financial officer of Siebel Systems, Inc., and fromDecember 1999 to December 2003, Mr. Goldman served on the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s primary advisory group. Mr. Goldman alsoserves on the board of directors of Gigamon, Yahoo! Japan, Trinet, GoPro, Inc. and several private companies. Mr. Goldman was a member of board oftrustees of Cornell University from 2005 to 2013 and was designated as Emeritus Trustee. He was formerly a member of the Treasury AdvisoryCommittee on the Auditing Profession, a public committee that made recommendations in September 2008 to encourage a more sustainable auditingprofession. Mr. Goldman holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School. • Dr. Marion Helmes (1965, German). Dr. Helmes has been appointed a non-executive director of our board of directors in October 2013. Dr. Helmeswas the Speaker of the Management Board of Celesio AG until July 2014; in addition she was CFO of Celesio from January 2012 until July 2014. Priorto joining Celesio, she was member of the board of management and CFO of Q-Cells SE and from 1997 until 2010 she held various management rolesat ThyssenKrupp, including CFO of ThyssenKrupp Stainless and CFO of ThyssenKrupp Elevator. Dr. Helmes is currently also non-executive directorand member of the audit and finance committee of ProSiebenSat1 Media AG and member of the Central Advisory Board of Commerzbank AG. • Josef Kaeser (1957, German). Mr. Kaeser has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective September 1, 2010.Mr. Kaeser is the president and chief executive officer of Siemens AG since August 2013. Prior to this, from May 2006 to August 2013, he wasexecutive vice president and chief financial officer of Siemens AG. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Kaeser served as chief strategy officer for Siemens AG andas the chief financial officer for the mobile communications group from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Kaeser has additionally held various other positions withinthe Siemens group since he joined Siemens in 1980. Mr. Kaeser also serves on the managing board of Siemens AG and the board of directors of SiemensLtd., India, Daimler AG and Allianz Deutschland AG. • Ian Loring (1966, American). Mr. Loring has been appointed a non-executive director of our board of directors in August 2010. Mr. Loring became amember of our supervisory board and the supervisory board of NXP B.V. on September 29, 2006 46Table of Contents and is a managing director of Bain Capital Partners, LLC. Prior to joining Bain Capital Partners in 1996, Mr. Loring worked at Berkshire Partners andhas previously also worked at Drexel Burnham Lambert. He serves as a director of The Weather Company, iHeart Media (formerly Clear ChannelCommunication Inc.), BMC Software, Inc. and Viewpoint, Inc. • Eric Meurice (1956, France). Mr. Meurice has been appointed as a non-executive director of the board of directors effective April 1, 2014.Mr. Meurice was the CEO and Chairman of the management board of ASML Holding NV (The Netherlands), a leading provider of manufacturingequipment and technology to the semiconductor industry from 2004 to 2013. Under his watch, ASML became the largest Lithography vendor in theworld, leading to a significant equity investment and funding commitment by its customers. Before Joining ASML, he was Executive Vice President ofThomson Television, where he completed the merger of his division with TCL Corporation, one of the largest Chinese consumer electronics company.Before 2001, he served as head of Dell Computers’ Western, Eastern Europe and EMEA emerging market businesses. He gained extensive technologyexperience in the semiconductor industry between 1984 and 1994, first at Intel, in the micro-controller group, and then at ITT Semiconductors, aprovider then of digital video and audio DSP integrated circuits. Mr. Meurice is an independent director of IPG Photonics, a US based Laser supplier,since June 2014. He served on the board of Verigy LTD (former HP test division), until its acquisition by Advantest in 2011. From July 1, 2013 toApril 1, 2014 he was non-executive director of ARM Holdings plc (UK, semiconductor intellectual property supplier). • Ms. Julie Southern (1959, British). Ms. Southern has been appointed a non-executive director of our board of directors in October 2013. She was withVirgin Atlantic Limited (UK) from 2000 to May 2013. From 2010 to 2013 Ms. Southern was chief commercial officer and from 2000 to 2010 she waschief financial officer of Virgin Atlantic. Prior to joining Virgin Atlantic, she was group finance director at Porsche Cars Great Britain and finance andoperations director at W H Smith – H J Chapman & Co Ltd. Prior to that, she was chartered accountant at Price Waterhouse Coopers. Since July 2014,Ms. Southern also serves as a non-executive director and Chair of the Audit Committee for Rentokil-Initial Plc. • Dr. Rick Tsai (1951, Taiwan/Republic of China). Dr. Tsai has been appointed as a non-executive director of our board of directors effective July1,2014. Dr. Tsai is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd., integrated telecom service provider in Taiwan as ofJanuary 28, 2014, Prior to joining Chunghwa Telecom, Dr. Tsai served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TSMC Solar and TSMC: SolidState Lighting from 2011 to 2014. From 2001 to 2011, he held the following successive positions in TSMC: President and Chief Operation Officer,President and Chief Executive Officer and President of New Business. Prior to joining TSMC, Dr. Tsai was based in the United States and worked forHewlett-Packard for several years. He holds a Ph.D. in material science from Cornell University.Management TeamSet forth below are the names, ages as of December 31, 2014, and positions of the executive officers who together with our chief executive officer,Mr. Clemmer, constitute our management team. Name Age PositionRichard L. Clemmer 63 Executive director, president and chief executive officerGuido Dierick 55 Executive vice president and general counselLoh Kin Wah 60 Executive vice president sales & marketingPeter Kelly 57 Executive vice president and chief financial officerRobert Rigby-Hall 49 Executive vice president and chief human resources officerSean Hunkler 52 Executive vice president and general manager of operationsRuediger Stroh 52 Executive vice president and general manager HPMS IdentificationFrans Scheper 52 Executive vice president and general manager Standard ProductsKurt Sievers 45 Executive vice president and general manager HPMS AutomotiveHai Wang 54 Executive vice president of R&DSteve Owen 54 Executive vice president sales & marketing • Guido Dierick (1959, Dutch). Mr. Dierick is executive vice president, general counsel, secretary of our board of directors and member of themanagement team. Since 2000 he has been responsible for legal and intellectual property matters at NXP. He previously was employed by Philips from1982 and worked in various legal positions. • Loh Kin Wah (1954, Malaysian). Mr. Loh Kin Wah is executive vice president, member of the management team, responsible for the RF Powerbusiness. Mr. Loh joined NXP in October, 2011 and was responsible for sales and marketing in the period 2011 – 2014: for much of 2014 he was co-lead along with Steve Owen. He previously was the President and CEO of Qimonda AG following its spin-out from Infineon Technologies AG. Prior tothis appointment, he was a member of the Infineon AG Executive Management Board responsible for the Communication Business Group andsubsequently the Memories Product 47Table of Contents Group. Mr. Loh has held a series of management positions within Infineon AG and its parent company Siemens AG, both in Europe and Asia. • Peter Kelly (1957, American). Mr. Kelly is executive vice president and chief financial officer of NXP and a member of the management team. Hejoined NXP in March, 2011, sharing responsibility with Mr. Belden for managing our overall operations, and since July 2012 he is CFO. Mr. Kelly hasover 30 years of applicable experience in the global technology industry and has extensive financial expertise having worked in financial managementpositions in several other companies, including as CFO of UGI Corp. and Agere Systems Inc. Mr. Kelly also serves on the board of Plexus, Corp. • Robert Rigby-Hall (1965, British). Mr. Rigby-Hall is executive vice president, chief human resources officer and member of the management teamsince August, 2011. Previously, Mr. Rigby-Hall was chief HR officer of LexisNexis, a global provider of information and technology solutions, that ispart of Anglo-Dutch group Reed Elsevier. • Sean Hunkler (1962, American). Mr. Hunkler is executive vice president, general manager of operations and a member of the management team.Mr. Hunkler joined NXP in July, 2012 with more than 28 years of experience in the semiconductor and materials industries in the US and Asia,including leading roles in internal and external manufacturing operations for MEMC and Freescale. Previously, Mr. Hunkler also served as a non-executive director on the board of SMIC and is a founding trustee of the Virginia Commonwealth University Engineering Foundation Board. • Ruediger Stroh (1962, German). Mr. Stroh is executive vice president, member of the management team and general manager of our High PerformanceMixed Signal businesses focused on the identification application markets. Before joining NXP in May, 2009, he led LSI Corporation’s StoragePeripherals business, overseeing silicon solutions for hard disk and solid state drives addressing consumer and enterprise markets. Previously, heheaded Agere System Inc’s storage division and served as chief executive officer for a number of start-up companies. Mr. Stroh began his career atSiemens AG where he held multiple management positions before joining Infineon Technologies AG. • Frans Scheper (1962, Dutch). Mr. Scheper has been executive vice president and general manager for the Standard Products business since November,2009, and has been a member of the management team since January, 2010. He has previously served as general manager of the general applications(discretes) business line within the multimarket business and served in various positions at Philips since 2000. • Kurt Sievers (1969, German). Mr. Sievers has been executive vice president and general manager of our High Performance Mixed Signal businessesfocused on the automotive application markets since November 2009 and since January 2010 he has been a member of the management team. He haspreviously managed the automotive safety and comfort business line and served in various positions at Philips since 1995. • Hai Wang (1960, American). Dr. Wang is executive vice president of R&D, leads the NXP R&D leadership team and is a member of our managementteam. He joined NXP as senior vice president, global external manufacturing in operations in July 2010. Mr. Wang has more than 24 years ofexperience in the semiconductor industry, where his management experience spans from IC design, technology R&D, front end & back end operations,sourcing, marketing and IP licensing. Prior to joining NXP, he held senior executive positions at companies as LSI Corporation, Agere Systems andFlextronics Semiconductors. He was co-founder and CEO of start-up MiraWave, Inc. Mr. Wang started his career at National Semiconductor as atechnology R&D engineer. • Steve Owen (1960, British), Mr. Owen is executive vice president, global sales & marketing and member of the management team. He has extensiveexperience in developing business internationally and served in various marketing and sales leadership positions at NXP and Philips since 1998.B. CompensationIn accordance with Dutch law, our stockholders have adopted a compensation policy for the board of directors. The remuneration of the non-executivedirectors has been resolved upon by our stockholders at a stockholder meeting at the proposal of our board of directors, prior to the consummation of theinitial public offering in August 2010. The remuneration of our executive directors is resolved upon by our board of directors, with due observance of ourcompensation policy. Our chief executive officer is our only executive director. The respective executive director does not participate in the discussions ofour board of directors on his compensation, nor does the chief executive officer vote on such a matter. To the extent the stockholders at a future stockholdermeeting do not adopt the proposal of the board, the board must prepare a new proposal. After adoption of a proposal, only subsequent amendments willrequire stockholder approval. Furthermore, any proposed share or option-based director compensation (including any performance conditions relating tosuch compensation) must be submitted by our board to the general meeting of stockholders for its approval, detailing the number of shares or options overshares that may be awarded to the directors and the criteria that apply to such award or any modification of such rights. Prior to the consummation of theinitial public offering in August 2010, our stockholders have approved such equity-based director compensation.Compensation Policy and ObjectivesThe objective in establishing the compensation policies for our chief executive officer, the other members of our management team and our otherexecutives, will be to provide a compensation package that is aligned with our strategic goals and that enables us to attract, motivate and retain highlyqualified professionals who will provide leadership for NXP’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. NXP seeks to accomplish this goal in a way thatrewards performance and is aligned with its shareholders’ long-term interests. We believe that the best way to achieve this is by linking executivecompensation to individual performance 48Table of Contentstargets, on the one hand, and to NXP’s performance, on the other hand. Our executive compensation package will therefore include a significant variable part,consisting of an annual cash incentive, shares and stock options. Executive performance targets will be determined annually, at the beginning of the year,and assessed at the end of the year by, respectively, our nominating and compensation committee, our executive officers or the other members of ourmanagement team. The compensation package for our chief executive officer, the other members of our management team and our NXP executives isbenchmarked on a regular basis against other companies in the high-tech and semiconductors industry.Base SalaryWe currently pay our chief executive officer an annual base salary of €1,142,000, the chairman of our board of directors an annual fixed fee of€275,000 and the other members of our board of directors an annual fixed fee of $85,000 gross. Members of our Audit Committee and the Nominating &Compensation Committee receive an additional annual fixed fee of $6,000 gross and the chairmen of both committees receive an additional annual fixed feeof $10,000 and $8,000 gross, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the current and former members of our management team as a group (intotal 14 members) received a total aggregate compensation of €8,233,052, compared to a total aggregate compensation of €7,974,976 (in total 13 members)in 2013.Our chief executive officer, the other members of our management team and most of our executives have a contract of employment for an indefiniteterm. The main elements of any new employment contract that we will enter into with a member of the board of directors will be made public no later than thedate of the public notice convening the general meeting of stockholders at which the appointment of such member of the board of directors will be proposed.Non-executive directors of our board do not have a contract of employment.Annual IncentiveEach year, our chief executive officer, the other members of our management team and our other executives can qualify to earn a variable cashincentive, subject to whether certain specific and challenging performance targets have been met. For our chief executive officer, the on-target cash incentivepercentage is set at 75% of the base salary, with the maximum cash incentive set at 150% of the annual base salary. The cash incentive pay-out in any yearrelates to the achievements of the preceding financial year in relation to agreed targets. In 2014, an amount of €1,575,960 has been paid to our chiefexecutive officer as annual incentive bonus for our performance in 2013. The total annual incentive bonus amount paid in 2014 to members of ourmanagement team, including our chief executive officer, is €5,047,102. In 2013, an amount of €4,002,021 has been paid to members of our managementteam, including our chief executive officer.Share Based Compensation PlansThe purpose of our share based compensation plans, including the Management Equity Stock Option Plan implemented prior to the consummation ofour initial public offering in August 2010 and our subsequent Long-Term Incentive Plans, is to align the interests of management with those of ourstockholders by providing additional incentives to improve our medium and long term performance, by offering the participants an opportunity to share inthe success of NXP.In the period from 2007 until our initial public offering in August 2010, we granted stock options to the members of our management team and toapproximately 135 of our other executives under the Management Equity Stock Option Plan (“MEP”). Under the MEP, the participants acquired the right topurchase a certain number of shares of common stock at a predetermined exercise price, provided that certain conditions are met. The stock options (“MEPOptions”) have a vesting schedule as specified upon the grant to the individuals. Pursuant to our MEP, members of our management team and certain otherexecutives will be allowed to exercise, from time to time, their vested MEP Options. The MEP Options became fully exercisable upon the Private EquityConsortium ceasing to hold 30% of our shares of common stock which was the case following the consummation of the secondary offering of shares onSeptember 18, 2013. Current employees owning MEP Options may exercise such MEP Options during the period of five years as of September 18, 2013,subject to these employees remaining employed by us and subject to the applicable laws and regulations. As of December 31, 2014, a total of 2,916,205 MEPOptions were granted and outstanding to a group of 20 (current) NXP executives (which includes our chief executive officer and other members of themanagement team). These MEP Options can be exercised at exercise prices which vary from €2.00 to €40.00 per stock option.In November 2010 and 2011, and in October 2012, 2013 and 2014 we introduced Long Term Incentive Plans 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014respectively, under which performance stock, restricted stock and stock options may be granted to the members of our board of directors, management team,our other executives, selected other key employees/talents of NXP and selected new hires. Under these Long Term Incentive Plans, equity incentives may begranted on, or the day after, the dates NXP publishes its quarterly financials, beginning on November 2, 2010, November 1, 2011, October 25, 2012,October 24, 2013 and October 23, 2014, respectively. Performance stock and restricted stock vest over a period of one to four years, subject to relevantperformance criteria relating to operating income being met, and stock options vest over four years. The size of the annual equity pool available for LongTerm Incentive Plan 2010 awards from November 2, 2010 up to the fourth quarter of 2011 was for an aggregate of up to 7,200,000 common shares in ourshare capital. On December 31, 2014, grants to 228 participants were outstanding, in total representing some 865,017 shares of common stock, consisting of865,017 stock options. 49Table of ContentsThe size of the annual equity pool available for Long Term Incentive Plan 2011 awards from November 1, 2011 up to the fourth quarter of 2012 was foran aggregate of up to 8.6 million (including 1.4 million which remained from the 2010 LTIP pool) common shares in our share capital. On December 31,2014, grants to 611 participants were outstanding, in total representing 2,735,020 shares of common stock, consisting of 534,311 performance stock units,96,460 restricted stock units and 2,104,249 stock options.The size of the annual equity pool available for Long Term Incentive Plan 2012 awards from October 25, 2012 up to the fourth quarter of 2013 was foran aggregate of up to 9.3 million (including 2.1 million which remained from the 2011 LTIP pool) common shares in our share capital. On December 31,2014, grants to 1,003 participants were outstanding, in total representing 5,136,389 shares of common stock, consisting of 1,833,835 performance stockunits, 554,816 restricted stock units and 2,747,738 stock options.The size of the annual equity pool available for Long Term Incentive Plan 2013 awards from October 24, 2013 up to the fourth quarter of 2014 is for anaggregate of up to 6.7 million (including 0.4 million which remained from the 2012 LTIP pool) common shares in our share capital. On December 31, 2014,grants to 1,533 participants were outstanding, in total representing 3,453,447 shares of common stock, consisting of 598,462 performance stock units,1,433,170 restricted stock units and 1,421,815 stock options.The size of the annual equity pool available for Long Term Incentive Plan 2014 awards from October 23, 2014 up to the fourth quarter of 2015 is for anaggregate of up to 7.5 million (including 2.2 million which remained from the 2013 LTIP pool) common share in our share capital. On December 31, 2014grants to 2,414 participants were outstanding, in total representing 2,590,477 shares of common stock, consisting of 307,735 performance stock units,1,473,561 restricted stock units and 809,181 stock options.Shares to be delivered under any equity program may be newly issued, for up to 10% of our share capital, or they may come out of treasury stock or bepurchased from time to time upon the decision of our board of directors.As of December 31, 2014, the following stock options, restricted stock, performance stock and shares of common stock were outstanding with membersof our board of directors:Richard L. Clemmer, CEO and presidentAs of December 31, 2014, our chief executive officer held 292,200 shares and had been granted the following (vested and unvested) stock options and(unvested) performance stock units, which were outstanding: Series Number of StockOptions ExercisePrice (in $) Number of Stock Options per vesting schedule 10/23/15 10/23/16 10/23/17 10/23/18 2014/October 161,675 64.18 40,418 40,419 40,419 40,419 Series Number ofStock Options ExercisePrice (in $) Stock OptionsVested Stock Options per vesting schedule 10/24/15 10/24/16 10/24/17 2013/October 344,635 39.58 86,158 86,159 86,159 86,159 Series Number of StockOptions ExercisePrice (in $) Stock OptionsVested Stock Options per vesting schedule 10/25/15 10/25/16 2012/October 410,000 23.49 205,000 102,500 102,500 Series Number of StockOptions ExercisePrice (in $) Stock optionsVested Stock Options per vesting schedule 11/01/15 2011/November 410,000 16.84 307,500 102,500 Series Number of StockOptions (all vested) ExercisePrice (in $) 2010/November 360,252 13.27 Series Number of StockOptions (all vested) ExercisePrice (in €) 2009/1 51,400 2.00 2009/2 1,400,000 15.00 2009/3 234,000 30.00 2009/4 374,252 40.00 Total 2,059,652 50Table of ContentsSeries Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance Stock Units per vesting schedule 10/23/15 10/23/16 10/23/17 10/23/18 2014/October 70,116 Maximum25% oftotal Maximum50% oftotal Up to75% oftotal Up to100% oftotal Series Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance Stock Units per vesting schedule 11/1/16 11/1/17 11/1/18 2014/October 50,639 Maximum 1/3rdoftotal Maximum2/3rd oftotal Up to100% oftotal Series Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance Stock Units per vesting schedule 10/24/15 10/24/16 10/24/17 2013/October 106,524 Maximum53,262 Up to 106,524 Up to106,524 Series Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance StockUnits per vesting schedule 03/01/16 2013/March 315,000 315,000 Series Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance Stock Units pervesting schedule 10/25/15 10/25/16 2012/October 100,000 Up to100,000 Up to100,000 Series Number ofPerformanceStock Units Number of Performance Stock Units pervesting schedule 02/09/15 2011/November 100,000 Up to100,000 Other members of our board of directorsAs of December 31, 2014, the other members of our board of directors held the following number of shares:Sir Peter Bonfield: 25,312 from vested stock unitsMr. Huth: 98,351 of which 28,351 are from vested stock unitsMr. Goldman: 28,351 from vested stock unitsDr. Helmes: 1,685 from vested stock unitsMr. Kaeser: 25,312 from vested stock unitsMr. Loring: 28,351 from vested stock unitsMs. Southern: 1,072 from vested stock units 51Table of ContentsTo each of Sir Peter Bonfield and Messrs. Huth, Goldman, Kaeser and Loring, all being members of our board of directors, the following restricted stockunits had been granted and were outstanding as of December 31, 2014: Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number ofStock Units pervesting schedule 10/23/15 2014/October 3,117 3,117 Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number of Stock Units per vesting schedule 10/24/15 10/24/16 2013/October 3,370 1,685 1,685 Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number of Stock Unitsper vesting schedule 10/25/15 2012/October 3,334 3,334 To each of Dr. Helmes and Ms. Southern, the following restricted stock units had been granted and were outstanding as of December 31, 2014: Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number of Stock Unitsper vesting schedule 10/23/15 2014/October 3,117 3,117 Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number of Stock Units per vesting schedule 10/24/15 10/24/16 2013/October 3,370 1,685 1,685 To each of Mr. Meurice and Dr. Tsai, in 2014 being appointed as member of our board of directors, the following restricted stock units had beengranted and were outstanding as of December 31, 2014: Series Number ofRestrictedStock Units Number of Stock Unitsper vesting schedule 10/23/15 2014/October 3,117 3,117 PensionsOur chief executive officer and eligible members of the management team participate in the executives’ pension plan, which we set up in theNetherlands and which consists of a combination of a career average and a defined-contribution plan. The plan does not require employee contributions. Wepaid for our chief executive officer a total pension plan contribution of €589,262 in 2014 (2013: €591,508). We also made a total pension plan contributionin the aggregate of €1,183,695 (2013: €1,160,470) for the members of our management team.Additional ArrangementsIn addition to the main conditions of employment, a number of additional arrangements apply to our chief executive officer and other members of themanagement team; these arrangements do not apply to the non-executive members of our board of directors. These additional arrangements, such as housingcompensation and relocation allowances, medical insurance, accident insurance, school fee compensation and company car arrangements are broadly in linewith those for the NXP executives globally. In the event of disablement, our chief executive officer and other members of the management team are entitledto benefits in line with those for other NXP executives. In the event of our chief executive officer’s death while in the service of NXP, any unvested equityawards (including any NXP stock options, performance stock units and restricted stock units) will vest. In line with regulatory requirements, the Company’spolicy forbids personal loans, guarantees or similar arrangements to members of our board, and consequently no loans, guarantees or similar arrangementswere granted to such members since 2010, nor were any such loans outstanding as of December 31, 2014. 52Table of ContentsUnless the law provides otherwise, the members of our board of directors are expected to be reimbursed by us for various costs and expenses, such asreasonable costs of defending claims, as formalized in the articles of association. Under certain circumstances, described in the articles of association, such asan act or failure to act by a member of our board of directors that can be characterized as intentional (opzettelijk), intentionally reckless (bewust roekeloos) orseriously culpable (ernstig verwijtbaar), there will be no entitlement to this reimbursement.Summary Compensation TableThe following table sets forth the annual compensation paid or granted during the year ended December 31, 2014 to the members of our board ofdirectors on an individual basis for services in all capacities. Salary and/or fees Performancerelatedcompensation(€) Number ofstock, stockoptions and stockunits granted Non-equityincentive plancompensationor benefits in kind(€) Pension,retirement orsimilar benefits(€) Richard L. Clemmer 1,142,000(1) 1,575,960 282,430 1,007,751 589,262 Sir Peter Bonfield 275,000(1) — 3,117 — — 6,000(2) — — — — Johannes P. Huth 91,000(2) — 3,117 — — Kenneth A. Goldman 101,000(2) — 3,117 — — Dr. Marion Helmes 91,000(2) — 3,117 — — Josef Kaeser 91,000(2) — 3,117 — — Ian Loring 85,000(2) — 3,117 — — Eric Meurice* 69,914(2) — 3,117 — — Michel Plantevin* 36,438(2) — — — — Jean-Pierre Saad* 32,603(2) — — — — Julie Southern 91,000(2) — 3,117 — — Rick Tsai* 42,500(2) — 3,117 — — Total: 1,417,000(1) 1,575,960 310,483 1,007,751 589,262 737,455(2) 1)in €2)in $*Mr. Eric Meurice was appointed effective April 1, 2014 and Mr. Rick Tsai was appointed effective July 1, 2014. Mr. Michel Plantevin and Mr. Jean-Pierre Saad resigned as non-executive director of the Company on May 20, 2014. 53Table of ContentsThe following table sets forth the annual compensation paid or granted during the year ended December 31, 2013 to the members of our board ofdirectors on an individual basis for services in all capacities. Salary and/or fees Performancerelatedcompensation(€) Number ofstock, stockoptions and stockunits granted Non-equityincentive plancompensationor benefits in kind(€) Pension,retirement orsimilar benefits(€) Richard L. Clemmer 1,142,000(1) 1,044,930 854,421 1,035,596 591,508 Sir Peter Bonfield 275,000(1) — 5,055 — — 6,000(2) — — — — Johannes P. Huth 91,000(2) — 5,055 — — Vikram Bhatia* 72,042(2) — — — — Nicolas Cattelain* 35,417(2) — — — — Egon Durban* 81,458(2) — — — — Kenneth A. Goldman 101,000(2) — 5,055 — — Dr. Marion Helmes* 19,716(2) — 5,055 — — Josef Kaeser 91,000(2) — 5,055 — — Ian Loring 85,000(2) — 5,055 — — Michel Plantevin 99,000(2) — 5,055 — — Roy MacKenzie* 81,458(2) — — — — Jean-Pierre Saad* 49,583(2) — 5,055 — — Julie Southern* 19,716(2) — 5,055 — — Total: 1,417,000(1) 1,044,930 899,916 1,035,596 591,508 832,390(2) 1)in €2)in $*Mr. Jean-Pierre Saad was appointed to replace Nicolas Cattelain, who resigned as non-executive director of the Company on May 30, 2013. OnOctober 10, 2013, Dr. Marion Helmes and Ms. Julie Southern were appointed as non-executive directors of the Company. On October 10, 2013,Mr. Vikram Bhatia, and on December 13, 2013, Messrs. Egon Durban and Roy MacKenzie, resigned as non-executive directors of the Company.C. Board PracticesManagement StructureWe have a one-tier board structure, consisting of an executive director and non-executive directors.Powers, Composition and FunctionThe number of executive and non-executive directors is determined by the board of directors. The board of directors will consist of one executivedirector and nine non-executive directors. The executive director, Mr. Clemmer, has been appointed as our chief executive officer.The appointment of the directors will be made by our general meeting of stockholders upon a binding nomination of the board of directors. Aresolution to appoint a director nominated by the board of directors shall be adopted by a simple majority of the votes cast. The nomination shall statewhether the director is proposed to be an executive or non-executive director. The general meeting of stockholders may at all times overrule the bindingnature of such a nomination by a resolution adopted by at least a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of ourissued share capital. The board of directors may then make a new nomination. If a nomination has not been made or has not been made in due time, this shallbe stated in the notice and the general meeting of stockholders shall be free to appoint a director at its discretion. The latter resolution of the general meetingof stockholders must also be adopted by at least two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of our issued sharecapital.Under our articles of association and Dutch corporate law, the members of the board of directors are collectively responsible for the management,general and financial affairs and policy and strategy of our company. Our executive director will be responsible for the day-to-day management of theCompany and for the preparation and execution of board resolutions, to the extent these tasks are not delegated to a committee of the board of directors. Ourchief executive officer or all directors acting jointly may represent our company with third parties.A conflict of interest between the Company and one or more of our directors is not expected to have any impact on the authority of directors torepresent the Company. Under our board regulations, a conflict needs to be reported to the board of directors and the board of directors shall resolve on theconsequences, if any. Effective per January 1, 2013, Dutch law, in case of a conflict, does not allow the directors concerned to participate in discussions orvote on such matters. 54Table of ContentsOur non-executive directors will supervise the executive director and our general affairs and provide general advice to the executive director.Furthermore the non-executive directors will perform such acts that are delegated to them pursuant to our articles of association or by our board regulation.One of the non-executive directors has been appointed as chairman of the board and another non-executive director has been appointed as vice-chairman ofthe board of directors.Each director owes a duty to us to properly perform the duties assigned to him and to act in the corporate interest of our company. Under Dutch law, thecorporate interest extends to the interests of all corporate stakeholders, such as stockholders, creditors, employees, customers and suppliers.Our directors are appointed for one year and will be re-electable each year at the general meeting of stockholders. The members of our board ofdirectors may be suspended or dismissed at any time by the general meeting of stockholders. A resolution to suspend or dismiss a director will have to beadopted by at least a two thirds majority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents more than half of our issued share capital and unless the proposalto suspend or dismiss a member of the board of directors is made by the board of directors itself, in which case resolutions shall be adopted by a simplemajority of votes cast. Effective per January 1, 2013, Dutch law facilitates the suspension of executive directors by the board.In the event that one or more directors are prevented from acting or in the case of a vacancy or vacancies for one or more directors, the board ofdirectors remains properly constituted. The board of directors is expected to have the power, without prejudice to its responsibility, to cause our company tobe represented by one or more attorneys. These attorneys shall have such powers as shall be assigned to them on or after their appointment and in conformitywith our articles of association, by the board of directors.The board of directors has adopted board regulations governing its performance, its decision making, its composition, the tasks and working procedureof the committees and other matters relating to the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the non-executive directors and the committees establishedby the board of directors. In accordance with our board regulations, resolutions of our board of directors will be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast ina meeting at which at least the majority of its members is present or represented. Each member of the board of directors has the right to cast one vote. In a tievote, the proposal will be rejected.Board CommitteesWhile retaining overall responsibility, our board of directors has assigned certain of its tasks to permanent committees. Members of the permanentcommittees will be appointed by the board of directors. The board of directors will also determine the tasks of each committee. Our board of directors hasestablished an audit committee and a nominating and compensation committee, each of which will have the responsibilities and composition describedbelow: • Audit Committee. Our audit committee consists of four independent non-executive directors, Messrs. Goldman and Kaeser and Dr. Helmes andMs. Southern. Mr. Goldman, who is appointed as chairman of the audit committee, will qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term isdefined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and as determined by our board of directors. Our audit committee will assist the board of directors insupervising, monitoring and advising the board of directors on financial reporting, risk management, compliance with relevant legislation andregulations and our business code of conduct. It will oversee the preparation of our financial statements, our financial reporting process, our system ofinternal business controls and risk management, our internal and external audit process and our internal and external auditor’s qualifications,independence and performance. Our audit committee also will review our annual and interim financial statements and other public disclosures, prior topublication. At least once per year, the non-executive directors who are part of the audit committee will report their findings to the plenary board ofdirectors. Our audit committee also recommends to our stockholders the appointment of external auditors. The external auditor will attend mostmeetings of the audit committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the risk analysis are also discussed at these meetings. • Nominating and Compensation Committee. Our nominating and compensation committee consists of three non-executive directors, Messrs. Huth,Meurice and Sir Peter Bonfield; all three members are independent directors under the Dutch corporate governance rules and under the NASDAQ andSEC compensation committee structure and membership requirements. Mr. Meurice is appointed as chairman of this committee. The nominating &compensation committee will determine selection criteria and appointment procedures for members of our board of directors, to periodically assess thescope and composition of our board of directors and to evaluate the performance of its individual members. It will be responsible for recommending tothe board of directors the compensation package for our executive directors, with due observance of the remuneration policy adopted by the generalmeeting of stockholders. It will review employment contracts entered into with our executive directors, make recommendations to our board ofdirectors with respect to major employment-related policies and oversee compliance with our employment and compensation-related disclosureobligations under applicable laws. 55Table of ContentsLimitation of Liability and Indemnification MattersUnless prohibited by law in a particular circumstance, our articles of association require us to reimburse the members of the board of directors and theformer members of the board of directors for damages and various costs and expenses related to claims brought against them in connection with the exerciseof their duties. However, there shall be no entitlement to reimbursement if and to the extent that (i) a Dutch court has established in a final and conclusivedecision that the act or failure to act of the person concerned may be characterized as willful (opzettelijk), intentionally reckless (bewust roekeloos) orseriously culpable (ernstig verwijtbaar) conduct, unless Dutch law provides otherwise or this would, in view of the circumstances of the case, beunacceptable according to standards of reasonableness and fairness, or (ii) the costs or financial loss of the person concerned are covered by an insurance andthe insurer has paid out the costs or financial loss. We may enter into indemnification agreements with the members of the board of directors and our officersto provide for further details on these matters. We expect to purchase directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for the members of the board of directors andcertain other officers, substantially in line with that purchased by similarly situated companies.At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any member of the board of directors, officer, employee or agent whereindemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceedings that might result in a claim for suchindemnification.Insofar as indemnification of liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to members of the board of directors,officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification isagainst public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is therefore unenforceable.D. EmployeesThe following table provides an overview of the number of full time employees we had per segment: As of December 31, 2014 2013 High Performance Mixed Signal 3,344 3,128 Standard Products 1,674 1,864 Corporate and Other: Manufacturing Operations 19,335 17,428 Central research and development 721 479 Sales and marketing 702 697 Information technology 343 307 Other shared services 1,753 1,761 Other 12 27 Total 27,884 25,691 The following table indicates the number of full time employees per geographic area: As of December 31, 2014 2013 Europe and Africa 6,344 6,574 Americas 518 479 Greater China 8,094 7,335 Asia Pacific 12,928 11,303 Total 27,884 25,691 We have not experienced any material strikes or labor disputes in the past. A number of our employees are members of a labor union. In variouscountries, local law requires us to inform and consult with employee representatives on matters relating to labor conditions. We consider our employeerelations to be good.E. Share OwnershipInformation with respect to share ownership of members of our board of directors is included in Part I, Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related PartyTransactions and notes 18 and 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to the grantof shares and stock options to employees is included in note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements which are incorporated herein by reference. In orderto maintain a strong alignment between the interests of NXP’s management and our shareholders, we have adopted an equity ownership policy for thePresident/CEO and the other members of our management team. The number of shares to be maintained by the members of our management team increaseseach time our shares are being delivered upon the vesting of stock options or other rights to our shares. The management team members are required tomaintain a certain number of our shares until the time that he or she is no longer employed by us. 56Table of ContentsItem 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party TransactionsA. Major ShareholdersThe following table shows the amount and percentage of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 by (i) each person who is or was known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each current member of ourboard of directors, and (iii) all members of the board and named executive officers as a group. A person is a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person hasor shares voting or investment power over the security or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Unless otherwise noted, thesepersons may be contacted at our executive offices and, unless otherwise noted, have to our knowledge sole voting and investment power over the shareslisted.As of December 31, 2014, the Cede & Co., a nominee of the Depository Trust Company, was the sole registered owner of our common stock in theUnited States and held 100% of shares of our common stock.In 2014, the Private Equity Consortium sold their remaining shares in the Company and as of December 31, 2014 no longer held any common stock inNXP. Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of December 31 2014 2013 2012 Number %* Number %* Number** %* Wellington Management Company, LLP(1) 18,843,170 7.48 28,935,677 11.49 — — FMR and FIL(2) 22,796,838 9.05 23,180,919 9.21 — — T. Rowe (3) 1,715,115 0.68 18,606,181 7.39 — — Richard L. Clemmer 3,410,762 1.36 3,224,174 1.28 1,309,587 0.52 Sir Peter Bonfield 25,312 0.01 43,549 0.02 27,897 0.01 Johannes P. Huth 98,351 0.04 89,999 0.04 79,999 0.03 Kenneth Goldman 28,351 0.011 22,999 0.01 14,999 0.01 Dr. Marion Helmes 1,685 0.001 — — — — Josef Kaeser 25,312 0.01 19,999 0.01 9,999 0.004 Ian Loring(4) 28,351 0.011 7,764,240 3.08 25,766,790 10.24 Eric Meurice — — — — — — Julie Southern 1,072 0.001 — — — — Rick Tsai — — — — — — All directors and named executive officers as a group(5) 3,619,196 1.44 11,184,959 4.45 27,219,270 10.81 *Percentage computations are based on 251,751,500 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013and December 31, 2012.**As of February 7, 2013.(1)Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management”), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own18,843,170 shares of our common stock, which are held by its clients and with regard to which Wellington Management has shared voting power andshared dispositive power. Wellington Management’s address is 28 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210, United States.(2)FMR LLC and/or Edward C. Johnson 3d, chairman of FMR LLC (collectively, “FMR”), through, among others, Fidelity Management & ResearchCompany “Fidelity”), Strategic Advisers, Inc. (“SA”), Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC (“PGALLC”) and Pyramis Global Advisors Trust Company(“PGATC”), and/or FIL Limited (“FIL”), through, among others, various subsidiaries, are, directly or indirectly, the beneficial owners of 22,796,838shares of our common stock. The address of Fidelity and SA is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, United Sates. The address ofPGALLC and PGATC is 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917, United States. The address of FIL is Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane,Hamilton, Bermuda.(3)T.Rowe Rice Associates, inc. (“T.Rowe”), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own 1,715,115 shares of our commonstock, which are held by its clients. T.Rowe’s address is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, United States.(4)Mr. Loring is a director of our Company, as well as a member of the investment committee of Bain Capital Investors, LLC. Amounts disclosed forMr. Loring include shares beneficially owned by the funds advised by Bain. Mr. Loring disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares owned directly orindirectly by funds advised by Bain.(5)Reflects shares that may be beneficially owned by our directors. However, each director disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. In addition, as ofDecember 31, 2014, stock options and other rights to shares represented a total of 17,696,555 shares of common stock were outstanding.No shareholders held different voting rights. 57Table of ContentsB. Related Party TransactionsSee Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, note 20 Related-party Transactions.C. Interests of Experts and CounselNot applicable. Item 8.Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationConsolidated StatementsSee Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements.Dividend PolicyWe currently retain all of our earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business, to repurchase or redeem capital stock, and in therepayment of our debt. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and may not pay any cash dividends in the foreseeablefuture. Whether or not dividends will be paid in the future will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level ofindebtedness, cash requirements, covenants in our financings, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors and our stockholders maydeem relevant. If, in the future, our board of directors decides not to allocate profits to our reserves (making such profits available to be distributed asdividends), any decision to pay dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our stockholders.B. Significant ChangesSee Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements, note 24 Subsequent Events. Item 9.The Offer and ListingA. Offer and Listing DetailsNot applicable.The following table shows the high and low closing sales prices of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ as reported in the Official PriceList for the following periods: Most recent six months January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low 80.35 72.38 77.82 72.13 77.85 69.25 68.66 53.90 73.01 68.43 68.52 60.50 On February 20, 2015, the closing sales price of the common stock on the stock market of NASDAQ was $84.66. 2014 2013 2012 High Low High Low High Low 1st quarter 59.91 42.94 32.80 26.55 26.97 16.01 2nd quarter 66.44 55.72 32.01 25.29 26.32 18.81 3rd quarter 73.01 60.50 39.11 31.18 26.67 20.03 4th quarter 77.85 53.90 45.95 36.03 26.32 20.93 B. Plan of DistributionNot applicable.C. MarketsThe shares of common stock of the Company are listed on the stock market of the NASDAQ Global Select Market in New York under the ticker symbol“NXPI”.D. Selling ShareholdersNot applicable. 58Table of ContentsE. DilutionNot applicable.F. Expenses of the IssueNot applicable. Item 10.Additional InformationA. Share CapitalNot applicable.B. Memorandum and Articles of AssociationThe information required by this section is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm F-1, filed on August 5, 2010 (File No. 333-166128).C. Material ContractsOther than the material contracts described below, we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business.2015On March 1, 2015, we entered into a Merger Agreement, by and among the Company, Freescale and Nimble Acquisition Limited, a Bermuda exemptedlimited liability company and Sub, providing for the merger of Sub with and into Freescale (the “Merger”), with Freescale surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of the Company.Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, Freescale Holdings L.P. (“Freescale LP”), the largest holder of FreescaleCommon Shares, the Company and certain limited partners of Freescale LP, entered into a support agreement (the “Support Agreement”) whereby FreescaleLP committed, among other things, subject to the terms and conditions of the Support Agreement, to vote all of its Freescale Common Shares (representingapproximately 64% of the Freescale Common Shares outstanding as of the date of the Support Agreement) for the adoption of (and not to participate in anylitigation challenging) the Merger Agreement.In connection with the Merger Agreement, NXP B.V. entered into a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with Credit Suisse Securities (USA)LLC (“Credit Suisse USA”) and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (“CS,” and together with Credit Suisse USA, “Credit Suisse”) regarding term loanfacilities, in an aggregate amount of up to $6,500 million (the “Term Facilities”). The proceeds of the Term Facilities will be used (i) to finance the cashconsideration due pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (ii) to refinance certain of Freescale’s indebtedness that becomes due as a result of theMerger, (iii) to effect the repayment of any amounts drawn under Freescale’s outstanding revolving credit facility and, if the Company so elects, theoutstanding revolving credit facility of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and (iv) to pay certain transaction costs.2014We entered into an indenture in relation to $1,150 million aggregate principal amount of U.S. Dollar-denominated 1.00% Cash Convertible SeniorNotes due 2019 on November 24, 2014.NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC entered into a Senior Secured Term Loan Facility for an aggregate principal amount of $400 million at a rate ofinterest of LIBOR plus 2% with a floor of 0.75% due 2017 on February 18, 2014.D. Exchange ControlsCash dividends payable on our ordinary shares and cash interest payments to holders of our debt securities may be remitted from the Netherlands tononresidents without legal restrictions imposed by the laws of the Netherlands, except that (i) such payments must be reported to the Dutch Central Bank forstatistical purposes only and (ii) the transfer of funds to jurisdictions subject to general economic sanctions adopted in connection with policies of the UnitedNations, European Commission or similar measures imposed directly by the Government of the Netherlands may be restricted.E. TaxationCertain Tax Considerations-Holder of Common StockSummary of Dutch Tax ConsiderationsThe following summary describes the material Dutch tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares of common stock as of the datehereof and is intended as general information only. This summary does not contain a detailed description of all the Dutch tax law consequences applicable toyou as a holder of shares of common stock in the Company in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the effects of any non-Dutch taxlaws. For Dutch tax purposes, a holder of our shares may include an individual who or an entity that does not have the legal title of the shares, but to whomnevertheless the shares are attributed based either on such individual or entity holding a beneficial interest in the shares or based on specific statutoryprovisions, including statutory provisions pursuant to which shares are attributed to an individual who is, or who has directly or indirectly inherited from aperson who was, the settlor, grantor or similar originator of a trust, foundation or similar entity that holds the shares.If you are considering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the Dutch taxconsequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.The following summary is based on the Dutch tax law as applied and interpreted by Dutch tax courts and as published and in effect on the date hereof,without prejudice to any amendments introduced at a later date and implemented with or without retroactive effect. For the purpose of this paragraph, “Dutchtaxes” means taxes of whatever nature levied by or on behalf of the Netherlands or any of its subdivisions or taxing authorities. The Netherlands means thepart of the Kingdom of the Netherlands located in Europe and does not include Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba. Any reference hereafter made to a treaty forthe avoidance of double taxation concluded by the Netherlands includes the Tax Regulation for the Kingdom of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor hetKoninkrijk), the Tax Regulation for the country of the Netherlands (Belastingregeling voor het land Nederland) and the Agreement between the TaipeiRepresentative Office in the Netherlands and the Netherlands Trade and Investment Office in Taipei for the avoidance of double taxation. 59Table of ContentsWithholding TaxA stockholder is generally subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent on dividends distributed by us, if any. Generally, we areresponsible for the withholding of such dividend withholding tax at source; the dividend withholding tax is for the account of the stockholder.Dividends distributed by us include, but are not limited to: • distributions of profits in cash or in kind, whatever they be named or in whatever form; • proceeds from the liquidation of the Company, or proceeds from the repurchase of shares by the Company, in excess of the average paid-incapital recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes; • the par value of shares issued to a stockholder or an increase in the par value of shares, to the extent that no contribution, recognized for Dutchdividend withholding tax purposes, has been made or will be made; and • partial repayment of paid-in capital, that is (i) not recognized for Dutch dividend withholding tax purposes, or (ii) recognized for Dutch dividendwithholding tax purposes, to the extent that we have net profits (zuivere winst), unless (a) the general meeting of stockholders has resolved inadvance to make such repayment and (b) the par value of the shares concerned has been reduced with an equal amount by way of an amendmentto our articles of association. The term net profits includes anticipated profits that have yet to be realized.Notwithstanding the above, no withholding is required in the event of a repurchase of shares, if certain conditions are fulfilled.Furthermore, subject to certain exceptions under Dutch domestic law, we may not be required to transfer to the Dutch tax authorities the full amount ofDutch dividend withholding tax withheld in respect of dividends distributed by us, if we have received a profit distribution from a qualifying foreignsubsidiary (including a subsidiary resident on Bonaire, St. Eustatius or Saba), which distribution is exempt from Dutch corporate income tax and has beensubject to a foreign withholding tax of at least 5 percent. The amount that does not have to be transferred to the Dutch tax authorities can generally notexceed the lesser of (i) 3 percent of the dividends distributed by us and (ii) 3 percent of the profit distributions that we received from qualifying foreignsubsidiaries in the calendar year in which we distribute the dividends (up to the moment of such dividend distribution) and in the two previous calendaryears. Further limitations and conditions apply. We will, upon request, provide stockholders with information regarding the Dutch dividend withholding taxthat was retained by us.If a stockholder is resident in a country other than the Netherlands under the provisions of a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation between theNetherlands and such country, such stockholder may, depending on the terms of such treaty, be entitled to an exemption from, reduction in or refund ofDutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.If a stockholder is subject to Dutch corporate income tax and is entitled to the participation exemption in relation to the benefits derived from theshares held by it and such shares are attributable to an enterprise carried out in the Netherlands, such stockholder will generally be entitled to an exemptionfrom Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.If a stockholder (i) is resident in another member state of the European Union or an appointed state of the European Economic Area, i.e. Iceland,Norway and Liechtenstein, according to the tax laws of that state and, under the terms of a double taxation agreement concluded by that state with a thirdstate, is not considered to be resident for tax purposes outside the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein; and (ii) owns an interest in us to whichthe Dutch participation exemption would be applicable if the stockholder were resident in the Netherlands; such stockholder will generally be eligible for anexemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us.Furthermore, if a stockholder: (a)is an entity which is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a member state of the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein or which is aqualifying stockholders resident elsewhere; (b)is not subject to a tax levied by reference to its profits in its country of residence; and (c)would not have been subject to Dutch corporate income tax had the stockholder been resident in the Netherlands for Dutch tax purposes;such stockholder will be eligible for a full refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax on dividends distributed by us, unless such stockholder iscomparable to an exempt investment institution (vrijgestelde beleggingsinstelling) or fiscal investment institution (fiscale beleggingsinstelling), asdescribed respectively in article 6a and 28 of the Dutch corporate income tax act 1969 (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969). For purposes of (a) above, aqualifying stockholder is an entity that (i) is resident for Dutch tax purposes in a jurisdiction which has an arrangement for the exchange of tax informationwith the Netherlands and (ii) holds its shares as a portfolio investment, i.e. such shares are not held with a view to the establishment or maintenance of lastingand direct economic links between the stockholder and the company and the shares do not allow the stockholder to participate effectively in the managementor control of the company.A stockholder who is considered to be resident in the United States and is entitled to the benefits of the convention between the United States and theNetherlands for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, dated December 18, 1992, as amendedmost recently by the Protocol signed March 8, 2004 (the “Treaty”), will be entitled to a reduction in the Dutch withholding tax by way of an exemption,reduction or refund, as follows: • if the U.S. stockholder is an exempt pension trust, as described in article 35 of the Treaty, or an exempt organization, as described in article 36 ofthe Treaty, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; 60Table of Contents • if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent of the voting power in the company, the U.S. stockholder will besubject to Dutch withholding tax at a rate not exceeding 5 percent; • if the U.S. stockholder is a company which holds directly at least 80 percent of the voting power in the company and certain other conditions aremet, the U.S. stockholder will be exempt from Dutch dividend withholding tax; and • in all other cases, the U.S. stockholder will be subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax at a rate of 15 percent.According to Dutch domestic anti-dividend stripping rules, no credit against Dutch (corporate) income tax, exemption from, reduction in or refund of,Dutch dividend withholding tax will be granted if the recipient of the dividend paid by us is not considered to be the beneficial owner (uiteindelijkgerechtigde) of such dividends as meant in these rules.Taxes on Income and Capital GainsThe description of taxation set out in this section of the Report does not apply to any stockholder who is an individual for whom the income or capitalgains derived from our shares of common stock are attributable to employment activities, the income from which is taxable in the Netherlands.A stockholder will not be subject to Dutch taxes on income or capital gains in respect of the ownership and disposal of our shares, other than Dutchdividend withholding tax as described above, except if: (i)the stockholder is, or is deemed to be, resident in the Netherlands for Dutch (corporate) income tax purposes; (ii)the stockholder derives profits from an enterprise, whether as entrepreneur (ondernemer) or pursuant to a co-entitlement to the net worth of suchenterprise other than as an entrepreneur or a stockholder, which enterprise is, in whole or in part, carried on through a permanent establishment(vaste inrichting) or a permanent representative (vaste vertegenwoordiger) in the Netherlands, to which the shares are attributable; (iii)the stockholder is an individual and derives benefits from miscellaneous activities (resultaat uit overige werkzaamheden) carried out in theNetherlands in respect of the shares, including, without limitation, activities which are beyond the scope of active portfolio investmentactivities; (iv)the stockholder is an individual and has a substantial interest (aanmerkelijk belang) or a fictitious substantial interest (fictief aanmerkelijkbelang) in the company, which is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise; (v)the stockholder is not an individual and has a substantial interest or a fictitious substantial interest in the company, which (fictitious) substantialinterest is not attributable to the assets of an enterprise and (one of) the main purposes of the chosen ownership structure is the evasion of Dutchincome tax or dividend withholding tax; (vi)the stockholder is not an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise or a co-entitlement to the net-worth of an enterprise,other than by way of the holding of securities, which enterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares areattributable; or (vii)the stockholder is an individual and is entitled to a share in the profits of an enterprise, other than by way of the holding of securities, whichenterprise is effectively managed in the Netherlands and to which enterprise the shares are attributable.Generally, a stockholder has a substantial interest if such stockholder, alone or together with its partner, directly or indirectly (a) owns, or holds certainrights on, shares representing five percent or more of the total issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of anyclass of shares of the company; (b) holds rights to, directly or indirectly, acquire shares, whether or not already issued, representing five percent or more of thetotal issued and outstanding capital of the company, or of the issued and outstanding capital of any class of shares of the company; or (c) owns, or holdscertain rights on, profit participating certificates that relate to five percent or more of the annual profit of the company or to five percent or more of theliquidation proceeds of the company. A stockholder will also have a substantial interest if its partner or one of certain relatives of the stockholder or of itspartner has a substantial interest.Generally, a stockholder has a fictitious substantial interest in the company if, without having an actual substantial interest in the company (i) anenterprise has been contributed to the company in exchange for shares on an elective non-recognition basis; (ii) the shares have been obtained underinheritance law or matrimonial law, on a non-recognition basis, while the disposing stockholder had a substantial interest in the company; (iii) the shareshave been acquired pursuant to a share merger, legal merger or legal demerger, on an elective non-recognition basis, while the stockholder prior to thistransaction had a substantial interest in an entity that was party thereto; or (iv) the shares held by the stockholder, prior to dilution, qualified as a substantialinterest and, by election, no gain was recognized upon disqualification of these shares. 61Table of ContentsGift Tax and Inheritance TaxNo Dutch gift or inheritance tax is due in respect of any gift of the shares by, or inheritance of the shares on the death of, a stockholder, except if: (i)at the time of the gift or death of the stockholder, the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands; (ii)the stockholder passes away within 180 days after the date of the gift of the shares and is not, or not deemed to be, at the time of the gift, but is, ordeemed to be, at the time of its death, resident in the Netherlands; or (iii)the gift of the shares is made under a condition precedent and the stockholder is resident, or is deemed to be resident, in the Netherlands at thetime the condition is fulfilled.For purposes of Dutch gift or inheritance tax, an individual who is of Dutch nationality will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has beenresident in the Netherlands at any time during the ten years preceding the date of the gift or its death. For purposes of Dutch gift tax, any individual,irrespective of its nationality, will be deemed to be resident in the Netherlands if he has been resident in the Netherlands at any time during the 12 monthspreceding the date of the gift.Other Taxes and DutiesNo other Dutch Taxes, including turnover tax and taxes of a documentary nature, such as capital tax, stamp or registration tax or duty, are payable byor on behalf of a stockholder by reason only of the purchase, ownership and disposal of the shares.ResidencyA stockholder will not become resident, or deemed resident in the Netherlands for tax purposes by reason only of holding the shares.United States Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsThe following summary describes the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our shares as of thedate hereof. The summary set forth below is applicable only to United States Holders (as defined below) (i) who are residents of the United States for purposesof the Treaty, (ii) whose shares do not, for purposes of the Treaty, form part of the business property of a permanent establishment, or pertain to a fixed base, inthe Netherlands, and (iii) who otherwise qualify for the full benefits of the Treaty. Except where noted, this summary deals only with shares held as capitalassets. As used herein, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of a share that is for United States federal income tax purposes: • an individual citizen or resident of the United States; • a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws ofthe United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; • an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or • a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authorityto control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to betreated as a United States person.This summary does not represent a detailed description of the United States federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject tospecial treatment under the United States federal income tax laws, including if you are: • a dealer in securities or currencies; • a financial institution; • a regulated investment company; • a real estate investment trust; • an insurance company; • a tax-exempt organization; • a person holding our shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, a constructive sale or a straddle; • a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities; • a person liable for alternative minimum tax; • a person liable for Medicare contribution tax; • a person who owns or is deemed to own 10% or more of our voting stock; • a person holding our shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States; • a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States federal income tax purposes; or • a person whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar.The summary below is based upon the provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations,rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be replaced, revoked or modified so as to result in United Statesfederal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. 62Table of ContentsIf a partnership holds our shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.If you are a partnership or a partner of a partnership holding our shares, you should consult your tax advisors.This summary does not contain a detailed description of all the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particularcircumstances and does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or the effects of any state, local or non-United States tax laws. If you areconsidering the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the United States federal income taxconsequences to you in light of your particular situation as well as any consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.Taxation of DividendsThe gross amount of distributions on the shares (including any amounts withheld in respect of Dutch withholding taxes to the extent such amounts areactually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Certain Tax Considerations—Holder of Common Stock—Summary of Dutch TaxConsiderations—Withholding Tax” above) will be taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, asdetermined under United States federal income tax principles. Such amounts taxable as dividends (including any portion thereof withheld and (or, in the caseof amounts withheld, deemed received) paid over to the Dutch tax authorities) will be includable in your gross income as ordinary income on the dayactually received by you or on the day received by your nominee or agent that holds the shares on your behalf. Such dividends will not be eligible for thedividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.With respect to non-corporate United States investors, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced ratesof taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with theUnited States which the United States Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of informationprovision. The United States Treasury Department has determined that the Treaty meets these requirements. We believe we are currently eligible for thebenefits of the Treaty. A foreign corporation is also treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares thatare readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that our shares, which arelisted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, are considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There can be noassurance that our shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years.Non-corporate holders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from a risk of loss or that elect totreat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless ofour status as a qualified foreign corporation. For this purpose, the minimum holding period requirement will not be met if a share has been held by a holderfor 60 days or less during the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which such share becomes ex-dividend with respectto such dividend, appropriately reduced by any period in which such holder is protected from risk of loss. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply todividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Thisdisallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of thislegislation to your particular circumstances.The maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to you pursuant to the Treaty is 15 percent. You may be required to properly demonstrate tothe Company and the Dutch tax authorities your entitlement to the reduced rate of withholding under the Treaty. Subject to certain conditions andlimitations, Dutch withholding taxes on dividends may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability.However, amounts withheld to reflect Dutch withholding taxes will not be creditable to the extent that we are allowed to reduce the amount of thewithholding tax that is actually transferred to the Dutch tax authorities, as described under “Certain Tax Considerations—Holder of Common Stock—Summary of Dutch Tax Considerations—Withholding Tax” above. For purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit, dividends paid on the shares will betreated as income from sources outside the United States and will generally constitute passive category income. Further, in certain circumstances, if you: • have held shares for less than a specified minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss, or • are obligated to make payments related to the dividends,you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on the shares. The rules governing the foreign tax credit arecomplex. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your particular circumstances.To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, as determined underUnited States federal income tax principles, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of theshares, and to the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds your tax basis, the excess will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange.However, we do not expect to determine earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expectthat a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend (as discussed above). 63Table of ContentsPassive Foreign Investment CompanyBased on the composition of our income and valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe we were a passive foreign investmentcompany (a “PFIC”) for the 2014 taxable year, and we do not expect to become one in the future, although there can be no assurance in this regard. If,however, we are or become a PFIC, you could be subject to additional United States federal income taxes on gain recognized with respect to the shares and oncertain distributions, plus an interest charge on certain taxes treated as having been deferred under the PFIC rules. Non-corporate United States Holders willnot be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us if we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in thepreceding taxable year.Taxation of Capital GainsFor United States federal income tax purposes, you will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of a share in an amount equal to thedifference between the amount realized for the share and your tax basis in the share. Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss. Capital gains ofindividuals derived with respect to capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses issubject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized by you will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss.Information Reporting and Backup WithholdingIn general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of our shares and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of our sharesthat are paid to you within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you are an exempt recipient. Backup withholding mayapply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report in full dividend andinterest income.Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your United States federal income taxliability provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.F. Dividends and Paying AgentsNot applicable.G. Statement by ExpertsNot applicable.H. Documents on DisplayIt is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this Report on Form 20-F that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference roomlocated at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges.The Company’s SEC filings are also publicly available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.I. Subsidiary InformationNot applicable. Item 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskWe are exposed to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates because we finance certain operations through fixed and variable ratedebt instruments and denominate our transactions in a variety of foreign currencies. Changes in these rates may have an impact on future cash flow andearnings. We manage these risks through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financialinstruments. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.By using derivative instruments, we are subject to credit and market risk. The fair market value of the derivative instruments is determined by usingvaluation models whose inputs are derived using market observable inputs, including interest rate yield curves, as well as foreign exchange and commodityspot and forward rates, and reflects the asset or liability position as of the end of each reporting period. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive,the counterparty owes us, thus creating a receivable risk for us. We are exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterpartiesto our derivative agreements. We minimize counterparty credit (or repayment) risk by entering into transactions with major financial institutions ofinvestment grade credit rating. Our exposure to market risk is not hedged in a manner that completely eliminates the effects of changing market conditions onearnings or cash flow. 64Table of ContentsInterest Rate RiskGiven the leveraged nature of our Company, we have inherent exposure to changes in interest rates. Our Secured Revolving Credit Facility has afloating rate interest. We have issued several Term Loans that have a floating rate interest and have issued several series of notes with maturities ranging from3 to 10 years with fixed rates. From time to time, we may execute a variety of interest rate derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. Consistent withour risk management objective and strategy, we have no interest rate risk hedging transactions in place.Foreign Currency RisksWe are also exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results as well as our financialposition and cash flows. We monitor our exposures to these market risks and generally employ operating and financing activities to offset these exposureswhere appropriate. If we do not have operating or financing activities to sufficiently offset these exposures, from time to time, we may employ derivativefinancial instruments such as swaps, collars, forwards, options or other instruments to limit the volatility to earnings and cash flows generated by theseexposures. Derivative financial instruments are only used for hedging purposes and not for trading or speculative purposes. The Company measures allderivative financial instruments based on fair values derived from market prices of the instruments or from option pricing models, as appropriate and recordthese as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair values are recognized in the statement of operations immediately unless cash flow hedgeaccounting is applied.Our primary foreign currency exposure relates to the U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate. However, our foreign currency exposures also relate, but are notlimited, to the Chinese Yuan, the Japanese Yen, the Pound Sterling, the Malaysian Ringit, the Singapore Dollar, the Taiwan Dollar and the Thailand Baht.Equity Price Risk2019 Cash Convertible Senior NotesOur 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes include conversion and settlement provisions that are based on the price of our common stock at conversionor at maturity of the notes. In addition, the hedges and warrants associated with these convertible notes also include settlement provisions that are based onthe price of our common stock. The amount of cash we may be required to pay to the holders at conversion or maturity of the notes is determined by the priceof our common stock. The amount of cash that we may receive from hedge counterparties in connection with the related hedges and the number of shares thatwe may be required to provide warrant counterparties in connection with the related warrants are also determined by the price of our common stock. Item 12.Description of Securities Other than Equity SecuritiesNot applicable. 65Table of ContentsPART II Item 13.Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and DelinquenciesNone Item 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of ProceedsNone Item 15.Controls and ProceduresDisclosure Controls and ProceduresAs of the end of the period covered by this Report, our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) of theeffectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financialofficer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Report such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonableassurance that information required to be disclosed in reports we filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized andreported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and included controls and procedures designedto ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executiveofficer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial ReportingThe Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, notabsolute assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S.generally accounting principles.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of anyevaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degreeof compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 based on the criteriaestablished in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).During the last quarter of 2014 the Company completed its transition to the updated 2013 COSO framework. Based on that assessment our managementconcluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at December 31, 2014.During 2014, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or arereasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.It should be noted that any control system, regardless of how well it is designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance thatits objectives will be met. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or bymanagement override of the control. In addition, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with thepolicies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design willsucceed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting FirmFor the year ended December 31, 2014 an attestation report regarding internal control over financial reporting of the Company’s registered publicaccounting firm is required. The attestation is included in Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements. Item 16A.Audit Committee Financial ExpertMr. Goldman, chairman of our audit committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) ofRegulation S-K and as determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Goldman is an independent director under theNASDAQ Global Select Market Corporate Governance Rules. 66Table of ContentsItem 16B.Code of EthicsThe NXP Code of Conduct outlines our general commitment to be a responsible social partner and the way in which we attempt to interact with ourstakeholders, including stockholders, suppliers, customers, employees and the market. The Code of Conduct expresses our commitment to an economically,socially and ethically sustainable way of working. It covers our policy on a diverse array of subjects, including corporate gifts, child labor, InternationalLabor Organization conventions, working hours, sexual harassment, free-market competition, bribery and the integrity of financial reporting.We have also adopted a Financial Code of Ethics applicable to certain of our senior employees, which constitutes a “code of ethics” as such term isdefined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Both the NXP Code of Conduct and our Financial Code of Ethics are available on our website atwww.nxp.com/investor/governance. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of thisReport on Form 20-F nor is incorporated by reference herein. Item 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesThe Company has instituted a comprehensive auditor independence policy that regulates the relation between the Company and its external auditorsand is available on our website (www.nxp.com/investor). The policy includes rules for the pre-approval by the audit committee of all services to be providedby the external auditor. The policy also describes the prohibited services that may not be provided. Proposed services may be pre-approved at the beginningof the year by the audit committee (annual pre-approval) or may be pre-approved during the year by the audit committee in respect of a particularengagement (specific pre-approval). The annual pre-approval is based on a detailed, itemized list of services to be provided, designed to ensure that there isno management discretion in determining whether a service has been approved and to ensure the audit committee is informed of each service it is pre-approving. Unless pre-approval with respect to a specific service has been given at the beginning of the year, each proposed service requires specific pre-approval during the year. Any annually pre-approved services where the fee for the engagement is expected to exceed pre-approved cost levels or budgetedamounts will also require specific pre-approval. The term of any annual pre-approval is 12 months from the date of the pre-approval unless the auditcommittee states otherwise. During 2014, there were no services provided to the Company by the external auditors which were not pre-approved by the auditcommittee.The external auditor attends, in principle, all meetings of the audit committee. The findings of the external auditor, the audit approach and the riskanalysis are also discussed at these meetings. The external auditor attends the meeting of the board of directors at which the report of the external auditor withrespect to the audit of the annual accounts is discussed, and at which the annual accounts are approved. In its audit report on the annual accounts to the boardof directors, the external auditor refers to the financial reporting risks and issues that were identified during the audit, internal control matters, and any othermatters, as appropriate, requiring communication under the auditing standards generally accepted in the Netherlands and the United States.Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report have been audited by KPMG Accountants N.V., an independent registered publicaccounting firm. These financial statements have been approved by the relevant boards.The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the fiscal periods 2014 and 2013 were as follows:Aggregate fees KPMG ($ in millions) 2014 2013 Audit fees 3.2 3.5 Other fees 0.1 0.1 3.3 3.6 Audit fees consist of fees for the examination of both the consolidated and statutory financial statements. Audit fees also include fees that only ourindependent auditor can reasonably provide such as comfort letters and review of documents filed with the SEC. 67Table of ContentsItem 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit CommitteesNot applicable. Item 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated PurchasersThe following table provides a summary of shares repurchased by the Company in 2014: Period begin Period end Period Total Numberof SharesPurchased Average PricePaid perShare Total Number ofShares Purchasedas Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plansor Programs MaximumNumber of Sharesthat May Yet BePurchased Underthe Plans orPrograms January 1 February 2 January 774 48.35 774 1,905,014 February 3 March 2 February 7,929,712 54.80 7,929,712 18,975,302 March 3 March 30 March 405,000 56.92 405,000 18,570,302 March 31 May 4 April 1,690,861 59.94 1,690,861 16,879,441 May 5 June 1 May 1,794,210 60.72 1,794,210 15,085,231 June 2 June 29 June 274,534 47.45 145,034 14,940,197 June 30 August 3 July 1,807,837 63.65 1,807,837 13,132,360 August 4 August 31 August 4,621,487 64.58 4,582,991 8,549,369 September 1 September 28 September 2,300,201 69.82 2,300,201 6,249,168 September 29 November 2 October 452,540 65.68 452,540 5,796,628 November 3 November 30 November — — — 5,796,628 December 1 December 31 December 1,969,021 76.18 1,969,021 3,827,607 Total 2014 23,246,177 61.73 23,078,181 From time to time, last in February 2014, the General Meeting of Shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to repurchase shares of our commonstock. On that basis, the Board of Directors resolved to repurchase shares to cover in part employee stock options and equity rights under its long termincentive plans. The purchases identified in the table were all pursuant to this authorization. Item 16F.Change in Registrant’s Certifying AccountantNot applicable. Item 16G.Corporate GovernanceThe Dutch Corporate Governance CodeSince our initial public offering in August 2010, we have been required to comply with the Dutch corporate governance code. The Dutch corporategovernance code, as revised, became effective on January 1, 2009, and applies to all Dutch companies listed on a government-recognized stock exchange,whether in the Netherlands or elsewhere. The code is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, companies are required to disclose in theirAnnual Reports filed in the Netherlands whether or not they are complying with the various rules of the Dutch corporate governance code that are addressedto the board of directors or, if any, the supervisory board of the company and, if they do not apply those provisions, to give the reasons for such non-application. The code contains principles and best practice provisions for managing boards, supervisory boards, stockholders and general meetings ofstockholders, financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards.The Dutch corporate governance code provides that if a company indicates to what extent it applies the best practice provisions, such company willdeemed to have applied the Dutch corporate governance code.The following discussion summarizes the primary differences between our corporate governance structure and best practice provisions of the Dutchcorporate governance code: • Best practice provisions II.2.4 and II.2.5 state that stock options granted to members of our board shall, in any event, not be exercised in the firstthree years after the date of granting and shares granted to board members without financial consideration shall be retained for a period of at leastfive years or until at least the end of the employment, if this period is shorter. Under our equity incentive schemes, part of the stock optionsgranted to our chief executive officer are exercisable one year after the date of grant, and members of our board who received restrictive sharesand performance shares are not required to retain these shares for at least five years. Although a deviation from the Corporate Governance Code,we hold the view that the combination of equity incentives granted to our chief executive officer, in relation to his obligation—laid down in theNXP Executive Equity Ownership Policy of October 2013—to maintain at least 20% of the after tax number of NXP shares delivered upon thevesting of any performance stock units granted as of October 2013, as well as the applicable strict vesting and performance criteria, will enhancethe goal of promoting long-term investments in the Company. The 68Table of Contents same is true for the equity grants made to other members of our board, which also have very strict vesting criteria with the purpose of creatinglong-term commitment to the Company. • Pursuant to best practice provision IV.1.1, a general meeting of stockholders is empowered to cancel binding nominations of candidates for theboard, and to dismiss members of the board by a simple majority of votes of those in attendance, although the company may require a quorum ofat least one third of the voting rights outstanding. If such quorum is not represented, but a majority of those in attendance vote in favor of theproposal, a second meeting may be convened and its vote will be binding, even without a one-third quorum. Our articles of association currentlystate that the general meeting of stockholders may at all times overrule a binding nomination by a resolution adopted by at least a two-thirdsmajority of the votes cast, if such majority represents more than half of the issued share capital. Although a deviation from provision IV.1.1 of theDutch Corporate Governance Code, we hold the view that these provisions will enhance the continuity of the Company’s management andpolicies.Effective January 1, 2012, Dutch law does not allow directors to vote on a matter with regard to which they have an interest.The NASDAQ Global Select Market Corporate Governance RulesWe are a foreign private issuer. As a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we rely on home countrygovernance requirements and are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements that would otherwise apply in accordance with the listingrequirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. These exemptions and home country rules relied on by us are described below: • We are exempt from NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of stockholders. Pursuant to Dutch corporate law, the validity of aresolution by the general meeting of stockholders does not depend on the proportion of the capital or stockholders represented at the meeting(i.e. quorum), unless the law or articles of association of a company provide otherwise. Our articles of association provide that a resolutionproposed to the general meeting of stockholders by the board of directors shall be adopted by a simple majority of votes cast, unless anothermajority of votes or quorum is required under Dutch law or our articles of association. All other resolutions shall be adopted by a two thirdsmajority of the votes cast, provided such majority represents at least half of the issued share capital, unless another majority of votes or quorum isrequired under Dutch law. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirement of Listing Rule 5620(c), which requires an issuer to provide inits bylaws for a quorum, and that such quorum may not be less than one-third of the outstanding voting stock. • We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies and provision of proxy statements for meetings ofstockholders. We inform stockholders of meetings in a public notice. We prepare a proxy statement and solicit proxies from the holders of ourlisted stock. Our practice in this regard, however, differs from the typical practice of U.S. corporate issuers in that the advance record date fordetermining the holders of record entitled to attend and vote at our stockholder meetings is determined by Dutch law (currently 28 days prior tothe meeting). As an administrative necessity, we establish a mailing record date in advance of each meeting of stockholders for purposes ofdetermining the stockholders to which the proxy statement and form of proxy will be sent. However, only stockholders of record on the specifiedrecord date are entitled to attend and vote, directly or by proxy, at the meeting. • NASDAQ requires stockholder approval prior to the issuance of securities when a stock option or purchase plan is to be established or materiallyamended or other equity compensation arrangement made or materially amended, pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors,employees or consultants. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, stockholder approval is only required for equitycompensation plans (or changes thereto) for members of the board, and not for equity compensation plans for other groups of employees.However, we note that under Dutch law, the stockholders have the power to issue shares or rights to subscribe for shares at the general meeting ofthe stockholders unless such power has been delegated to the board. Our board is designated for a period of five years from the date of the publicoffering in August 2010 to issue shares and rights to subscribe for shares. • As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement that compensation committees be comprised exclusively of independentdirectors provided that we describe the home country practice followed in lieu of such requirement and disclose the reasons for not having suchan independent compensation committee. Under Dutch law and the Dutch corporate governance code, the general meeting of stockholders mustadopt a policy in respect of the remuneration of the board. In accordance with our articles of association and our board rules, the remuneration ofthe executive directors is determined by the board of directors upon the recommendation of our nominating and compensation committee.Accordingly, applicable laws, regulations and corporate governance rules and practices do not require independence of the members of ournominating and compensation committee. Currently, all three members of our nominating and compensation committee are independentdirectors under the Dutch corporate governance rules and under the NASDAQ and SEC compensation committee structure and membershiprequirements. • We are exempt from NASDAQ’s requirement to have independent director oversight of director nominations. In accordance with Dutch law, ourarticles of association require that our directors will be appointed by the general meeting of stockholders upon the binding nomination of theboard. In accordance with our board rules, the nominating and compensation committee will recommend the nomination of directors to ourboard. 69Table of Contents • NASDAQ requires us to adopt a nominations committee charter or a board resolution addressing the nominations process. In accordance with theDutch corporate governance code, we have adopted the committee’s charter. However, the nominations process has been set out in our articles ofassociation and board rules.Moreover, we will not distribute Annual Reports to all of our stockholders in accordance with NASDAQ rules. Dutch law requires that the externalauditors be appointed at the general meeting of stockholders and not by the audit committee. Our audit committee, which consists of members of our board ofdirectors, shall only make a recommendation to the stockholders through the board of directors for the appointment and compensation of the independentregistered public accounting firm and shall oversee and evaluate the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. Item 16H.Mine Safety DisclosuresNot applicable. 70Table of ContentsPART III Item 17.Financial StatementsWe are furnishing the financial statements pursuant to the instructions of Part III, Item 18. Financial Statements of this Report. Item 18.Financial StatementsSee pages F-1 to F-36 Item 19.Exhibits ExhibitNumber Description of Document 2.1# Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2010, between NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V., the Dover Corporation, KnowlesElectronics, LLC and EFF Acht Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Form 20-F of NXPSemiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXPSemiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) 3.2 Articles of Association of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 7 to the RegistrationStatement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V., filed on August 2, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) 4.1 Secured Term Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2011, as amended by (i) the Joinder and Amendment Agreement dated as of November 18,2011, (ii) the New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of February 16, 2012, (iii) the New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as ofDecember 10, 2012, (iv) the 2013 New Term Loan Joinder Agreement dated as of November 27, 2013, and (v) the 2014 New Term LoanJoinder Agreement dated as of February 18, 2014, among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrowers, Barclays Bank PLC as AdministrativeAgent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global Collateral Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent, and thelenders party thereto. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) 4.2 Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated April 27, 2012, as amended by an Incremental Joinder Agreement dated as of October 29, 2012,among NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as borrower, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Global CollateralAgent and Administrative Agent, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. as Taiwan Collateral Agent and the lenders party thereto. (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 4.10 of the Form 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 1, 2013) 4.3 Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of February 14, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named onthe signature page thereto as borrower and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 ofForm 20-F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012) 4.4 Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of March 12, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named onthe signature pages thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Form-20Fof NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) 4.5 Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of May 20, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors named on thesignature pages thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form-20F ofNXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) 4.6 Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of September 24, 2013 among NXP B.V. and NXP Funding LLC as Issuers, each of the Guarantors namedon the signature page thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014) 4.7 Senior Unsecured Indenture dated as of November 24, 2014 among NXP Semiconductors N.V. as Issuer and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas as Trustee 4.8 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP Semiconductors N.V., Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. andNimble Acquisition Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) 4.9 Support Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP Semiconductors N.V., Freescale Holdings L.P. and certain limited partnersof Freescale Holdings L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) 4.10 Commitment Letter, dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among NXP B.V., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse AG, CaymanIslands Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Form 6-K of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 3, 2015) 71Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description of Document10.1 Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of September 28, 2006 between Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and NXPB.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP SemiconductorsN.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.2 Intellectual Property Transfer and License Agreement dated as of November 16, 2009 among NXP B.V., Virage Logic Corporation and VL C.V.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V.filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.3 Shareholders’ agreement dated as of March 30, 1999, as amended among EBD Investments Pte. Ltd., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. andTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Amendment No. 3 to the RegistrationStatement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.4 Lease Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004 between Jurong Town Corporation and Systems on Silicon Manufacturing Company Pte. Ltd.for the property at No. 70 Pasir Ris Drive 1, Singapore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Amendment No. 2 to the RegistrationStatement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.5 Lease Agreement dated September 26, 2003 between Huangjiang Investment Development Company and NXP Semiconductors (Guangdong)Company Ltd. for the property at Tian Mei High Tech Industrial Park, Huang, Jiang Town, Dongguan City, China (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.9 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No.333-166128))10.6 Building Lease Contract dated as of May 12th, 2000 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) andNXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on FormF-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.7 Agreement with regard to the Lease of a Single (vehicle) Shelter dated as of October 30, 2009 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.8 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Standard Plant Basements dated as of July 1, 2011 between the Export Processing Zone Administration(Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form-20F of NXPSemiconductors N.V. filed on February 28, 2014)10.9 Agreement with regard to the Lease of a Single (vehicle) Shelter dated as of March 8, 2010 between the Export Processing Zone Administration(Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Amendment No. 2 tothe Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.10 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Additional Land dated as of July 1, 2008 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministryof Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Amendment No. 2 to theRegistration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.11 Agreement with regard to the Lease of a Dangerous Goods Warehouse dated as of November 27, 2009 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.12 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Land at Property Number AL012 dated as of July 1, 2008 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128)) 72Table of ContentsExhibitNumber Description of Document10.13 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Land at Property Number AL020 dated as of July 1, 2008 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.14 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Land at Property Number AL071 dated as of July 1, 2008 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.15 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Land at Property Number CL102 dated as of July 1, 2008 between the Export Processing ZoneAdministration (Ministry of Economic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of theAmendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.16 Agreement with regard to the Lease of Land dated as of September 30, 2008 between the Export Processing Zone Administration (Ministry ofEconomic Affairs) and NXP Semiconductors Taiwan Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Amendment No. 2 to theRegistration Statement on Form F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.17 Management Equity Stock Option Plan Terms and Conditions dated August 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Form-20Fof NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012)10.18 Management Equity Stock Option Plan Terms and Conditions dated January 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Form-20Fof NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012)10.19 Long Term Incentive Plan 2010 Terms and Conditions with regard to the Stock Option Plan, the Performance Stock Unit Plan, Restricted StockUnit Plan and Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012)10.20 NXP Global Equity Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement onForm F-1 of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on June 30, 2010 (File No. 333-166128))10.21 Long Term Incentive Plan 2011 Terms and Conditions with regard to the Stock Option Plan, the Performance Stock Unit Plan, Restricted StockUnit Plan and Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 13, 2012)10.22 Long Term Incentive Plan 2012/3 Terms and Conditions with regard to the Stock Option Plan, the Performance Stock Unit Plan, RestrictedStock Unit Plan and Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on March 1,2013). Long Term Incentive Plan 2013/4 Terms and Conditions with regard to the Stock Option Plan, the Performance Stock Unit Plan andRestricted Stock Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Form-20F of NXP Semiconductors N.V. filed on February 28,2014) and Long Term Incentive Plan 2014/5 Terms and Conditions with regard to the Stock Option Plan, the Performance Stock Unit Plan, theRestricted Stock Unit Plan and the Keep Restricted Stock Unit Plan10.23 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Terms and Conditions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form S-8 of NXP Semiconductors N.V.filed on August 8, 2013)12.1 Certification of R. Clemmer filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13a-14(a)12.2 Certification of P. Kelly filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13a-14(a)13.1 Certification of R. Clemmer furnished pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13a-14(b)13.2 Certification of P. Kelly furnished pursuant to 17 CFR 240. 13a-14(b)21.1 List of Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant22 Consent of KPMG Accountants N.V. #Confidential treatment previously requested and granted 73Table of ContentsGLOSSARY 32 bit ARM microcontrollersMicrocontroller based on a 32-bit processor core developed and licensed by ARM Technologies.AC-DCConversion of alternating current to direct current.AnalogA form of transmission that is a continuous wave of an electrical signal that varies in frequency and/oramplitude in response to variations of physical phenomena such as human speech or music.Back-endThe packaging, assembly and testing stages of the semiconductors manufacturing process, which takes placeafter electronic circuits are imprinted on silicon wafers in the front-end process.BCDMOSBipolar CMOS DMOS. A process technology that combines elements of bipolar, CMOS and DMOS technologyand is capable of handling high voltages.BiCMOSA process technology that combines bipolar and CMOS processes, typically by combining digital CMOScircuitry with higher voltage or higher speed bipolar circuitry.BipolarA process technology used to create semiconductors for applications involving the use of higher power levelsthan are possible with a CMOS chip. Due to the geometry of a bipolar circuit, these devices are significantlylarger than CMOS devices. The speed of the most advanced bipolar devices exceeds those attainable withCMOS, but only at very large electrical currents. As a result, the number of bipolar devices that can beintegrated into a single product is limited.Bluetooth low energyBluetooth low energy (BLE) is a wireless computer network technology that, in comparison with “classic”Bluetooth, requires considerably less power and provides a similar communication range. BLE has beenincluded in the majority of smart phones for the past couple of years, with its initial application as thecommunication between the smart phone and other personal devices like fitness trackers and head-sets.Recently also other applications like communication with light bulbs are emerging.CANController Area Network. A network technology used in automotive network architecture.CATVAn abbreviation for cable television.Car access and immobilizersAn automobile technology segment focused on keyless entry and car immobilization applications. Anautomobile immobilizer is an electronic device fitted to an automobile which prevents the engine from runningunless the correct key (or other token) is present.ChipSemiconductor device.CFLCompact Fluorescent Light. A type of fluorescent lamp designed to replace an incandescent lamp, while usingless power and increasing rated life. 74Table of ContentsCMOSComplementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor. The most common integrated circuit fabrication technology inthe semiconductor industry. The technology is used to make integrated circuits where small size and high speedare important. As a result of the very small feature sizes that can be attained through CMOS technology,however, the ability of these integrated circuits to cope with high electrical currents and voltages is limited.Coolflux DSPA low power digital signal processor designed for mobile audio applications.DigitalA form of transmission where data is represented by a series of bits or discrete values such as 0 and 1.DiodeA semiconductor that allows currents to flow in one direction only.Discrete semiconductorsUnlike integrated circuits, which contain up to tens of millions of transistors, discrete semiconductors are singledevices, usually with two terminals (diodes) or three terminals (transistors). These are either applied asperipheral components on printed circuit boards, or used for special purposes such as very high powerapplications.DMOSDiffused Metal on Silicon Oxide Semiconductor. A process technology used to manufacture integrated circuitsthat can operate at high voltage.DSPDigital signal processor. A specialized microprocessor optimized to process sequences of numbers or symbolswhich represent signals.EMI filteringElectromagnetic interference (or EMI, also called radio frequency interference or RFI when in high frequency orradio frequency) is disturbance that affects an electrical circuit due to either electromagnetic induction orelectromagnetic radiation emitted from an external source.e-passportA passport with secure data source chip used in providing personalized information.ESDElectrostatic discharge. The sudden and momentary electric current that flows between two objects caused bydirect contact or induced by an electrostatic field. This term is used in the context of electronics to describemomentary unwanted currents that may cause damage to electronic equipment.Fab (or wafer fab)A semiconductor fabrication facility in which front-end manufacturing processes take place.Fabless semiconductor companyA semiconductor company that does not have any internal wafer fab manufacturing capacity but insteadfocuses on designing and marketing its products, while outsourcing manufacturing to an independent foundry.FlexRayA new communications protocol designed for the high data transmission rates required by advancedautomotive control systems.FoundryA semiconductor manufacturer that manufactures chips for third parties.Front-endThe wafer processing stage of the semiconductors manufacturing process in which electronic circuits areimprinted onto raw silicon wafers. This stage is followed by the packaging, assembly and testing stages, whichtogether comprise the back-end process.HDMIHigh-Definition Multimedia Interface. A compact audio/video interface for transmitting uncompressed digitaldata. 75Table of ContentsI2 CA multi-master serial single-ended computer bus that is used to attach low-speed peripherals to a motherboard,embedded system or mobile phone.Integrated CircuitIntegrated Circuit. A miniaturized electronic circuit that has been manufactured in the surface of a thin substrateof semiconductor material.ICN 4,6,8NXP wafer fab facilities located in Nijmegen, Netherlands, processing 4”, 6” or 8” diameter wafers. As of endDecember 2014, only ICN 8 is still in use.In-process research and developmentThe value allocated to incomplete research and development projects in acquisitions treated as purchases.LeadframeA thin layer of metal that connects the wiring from tiny electrical technicals on the semiconductor surface to thelarge scale circuitry on electrical devices and circuit boards. Leadframes are used in almost all semiconductorpackages.LDMOSLaterally Diffused Metal Oxide Semiconductor. A transistor used in RF/microwave power amplifiers.LEDLight Emitting Diode. A semiconductor device which converts electricity into light.LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate. The benchmark rate at which interbank term deposits within the leadings banksin London would be charged if borrowing from other banks.LINLocal Interconnect Network. A network technology used in automotive network architecture.LNALow-Noise Amplifier. An electronic amplifier used to amplify very weak signals.Magneto-resistive deviceA device fabricated with magneto-resistive material (material that has the ability to change the value of itselectrical resistance when an external magnetic field is applied to it).MemoryAny device that can store data in machine readable format. Usually used synonymously with random accessmemory and read only memory.MicrocontrollerA microprocessor combined with memory and interface integrated on a single circuit and intended to operate asan embedded system.MicronA metric unit of linear measure which equals one millionth of a meter. A human hair is about 100 microns indiameter.MIFARETrademarked name, owned by NXP, for the most widely used contactless smart card, or proximity card,technology, for payment in transportation systems.Mixed-signalThe mixed-signal part of an application solution refers to the devices and sub-system solutions that translatereal world analog signals and phenomena such as radio frequency communication and power signals, sound,light, temperature, pressure, acceleration, humidity and chemical characteristics into digital or power signalsthat can be fed into the central microprocessing or storage devices at the heart of an application systemsolution.MMICMonolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit. A type of integrated circuit device that operates at microwavefrequencies. 76Table of Contents MOS Metal Oxide Semiconductor. A metal insulator semiconductor structure in which the insulating layer is anoxide of the substrate material.MOSFETMetal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor. A device used for amplifying or switching electronicsignals.NanometerA metric unit of linear measure which equals one billionth of a meter. There are 1,000 nanometers in 1 micron.NFCNear field communication. A technology which allows devices to establish a secure point-to-point wirelessconnection at very close ranges (within several centimeters), and which is being increasingly adopted in mobiledevices and point-of-sale terminals or other devices.ODMOriginal Design Manufacturer. A company which manufactures a product which ultimately will be branded byanother firm for sale.OEMOriginal Equipment Manufacturer. A manufacturer that designs and manufactures its products for the endconsumer market.Power MOSA specific type of metal oxide semiconductor designed to handle large amounts of power.Power scalingDesign technique used to increase output power without changing the geometry, shape, or principle ofoperation.Process technologiesThe technologies used in front-end processes to convert raw silicon wafers into finished wafers containinghundreds or thousands of chips.QAMQuadrature-Amplitude ModulationQPSKQuadrature phase shift keyingRectifierAn electrical device that converts alternating current to direct current.RFRadio Frequency. A high frequency used in telecommunications. The term radio frequency refers to alternatingcurrent having characteristics such that, if the current is input to an antenna, an electromagnetic (EM) field isgenerated suitable for wireless broadcasting and/or communications.Radio Frequency IdentificationAn RF chip used for identification.SemiconductorsGeneric term for devices such as transistors and integrated circuits that control the flow of electrical signals. Themost common semiconductor material for use in integrated circuits is silicon.SiliconA type of semiconducting material used to make wafers. Silicon is widely used in the semiconductor industry asa base material.Silicon tunersSemiconductor devices for receiving broadcast television signals. Silicon tuners are expected to displacemechanical can tuners as the dominant technology in television receivers.SIMSubscriber Identity Module. A smart card that stores the key identifying a cellular phone service subscriber andrelated information.Solid State LightingA type of lighting that uses semiconductor light-emitting diodes (LEDs), organic light-emitting diodes (OLED),or polymer light-emitting diodes (PLED) as sources of illumination rather than electrical filaments, plasma orgas. 77Table of ContentsSPISerial Peripheral Interface Bus. A synchronous serial data link standard that operates in full duplex mode.SS MOSSmall signal power discrete including a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor.SS TransistorA small signal transistor.SubstrateThe base material made from silicon on which an integrated circuit is printed.TelematicsThe science of sending, receiving and storing information via telecommunication devices.ThyristorA four-layer semiconductor that is often used for handling large amounts of electrical power.UARTUniversal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter. An integrated circuit used for serial communications over acomputer or peripheral device serial port.USBUniversal Serial Bus. A standard that provides a serial bus standard for connecting devices, usually to acomputer.WaferA disk made of a semiconducting material, such as silicon, usually either 100, 125, 150, 200 or 300 millimetersin diameter, used to form the substrate of a chip. A finished wafer may contain several thousand chips.White goodsA term which refers to large household appliances such as refrigerators, stoves, dishwashers and other similaritems.YieldThe ratio of the number of usable products to the total number of manufactured products. 78Table of ContentsSIGNATURESThe registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned tosign this Annual Report on its behalf. NXP Semiconductors N.V.(Registrant)/s/ RICK CLEMMER/s/ PETER KELLYRick ClemmerPeter KellyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: March 6, 2015 79Table of ContentsINDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe following financial statements and related schedules, together with the report of independent registered public accounting firms thereon, are filedas part of this Annual Report:Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, KPMG Accountants N.V.Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 F-4 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 F-6 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 F-7 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-8 F-1Table of ContentsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmThe Board of Directors and StockholdersNXP Semiconductors N.V.:We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NXP Semiconductors N.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in equity for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2014. We also have audited NXP Semiconductors N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteriaestablished in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).NXP Semiconductors N.V.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financialreporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report onInternal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require thatwe plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effectiveinternal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimatesmade by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtainingan understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design andoperating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessaryin the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal controlover financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairlyreflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permitpreparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are beingmade only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention ortimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate.In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NXP SemiconductorsN.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, NXP Semiconductors N.V. maintained, inall material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – IntegratedFramework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). /s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.Amstelveen, the NetherlandsMarch 6, 2015 F-2Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Consolidated Statements of Operations ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Revenue 5,647 4,815 4,358 Cost of revenue (3,007) (2,638) (2,370) Gross profit 2,640 2,177 1,988 Research and development (763) (639) (628) Selling, general and administrative (838) (896) (977) Other income (expense) 10 9 29 Operating income (loss) 1,049 651 412 Financial income (expense):Extinguishment of debt (3) (114) (161) Other financial income (expense) (407) (160) (276) Income (loss) before income taxes 639 377 (25) Benefit (provision) for income taxes (40) (20) (1) Results relating to equity-accounted investees 8 58 (27) Income (loss) from continuing operations 607 415 (53) Income (loss) on discontinued operations, net of tax — — 1 Net income (loss) 607 415 (52) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests 68 67 63 Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders 539 348 (115) Earnings per share data:Basic earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $– Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.27 1.40 (0.46) – Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — – Net income (loss) 2.27 1.40 (0.46) Diluted earnings per common share attributable to stockholders in $– Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.17 1.36 (0.46) – Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — – Net income (loss) 2.17 1.36 (0.46) Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year (in thousands)– Basic 237,954 248,526 248,064 – Diluted 248,609 255,050 248,064 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-3Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Net income (loss) 607 415 (52) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Net investment hedge, net of deferred taxes of $0, $0 and $(8) (214) 68 18 Changes in fair value cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes $0, $0 and $0 — (9) — Foreign currency translation adjustments 140 (27) 10 Net actuarial gain (loss), net of deferred taxes of $2, $(10) and $3 (66) 10 (51) Unrealized gains (losses) available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes of $0 1 — — Reclassification adjustments, net of deferred taxes of $0: Changes in fair value cash flow hedges * 2 5 — Total other comprehensive income (loss) (137) 47 (23) Total comprehensive income (loss) 470 462 (75) Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests 68 67 63 Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to stockholders 402 395 (138) *Included in Cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-4Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Consolidated Balance Sheets ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) As of December 31, 2014 2013 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 1,185 670 Receivables, net 593 542 Assets held for sale — 13 Inventories, net 755 740 Deferred tax assets 8 11 Other current assets 99 116 Total current assets 2,640 2,092 Non-current assets:Investments in equity-accounted investees 71 52 Other non-current assets 365 144 Property, plant and equipment, net 1,123 1,048 Identified intangible assets, net 573 755 Goodwill 2,121 2,358 Total non-current assets 4,253 4,357 Total assets 6,893 6,449 Liabilities and equityCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable 729 544 Liabilities held for sale — 1 Restructuring liabilities - current 37 103 Payroll and related benefits 295 260 Accrued liabilities 239 245 Short-term debt 20 40 Total current liabilities 1,320 1,193 Non-current liabilities:Long-term debt 3,979 3,281 Pension and postretirement benefits 284 247 Restructuring liabilities 3 14 Other non-current liabilities 506 168 Total non-current liabilities 4,772 3,710 Equity:Non-controlling interests 263 245 Stockholders’ equity:Common stock, par value €0.20 per share:Authorized: 430,503,000 shares (2013: 430,503,000 shares)Issued and fully paid: 251,751,500 shares (2013: 251,751,500 shares) 51 51 Capital in excess of par value 6,300 6,175 Treasury shares, at cost:19,171,454 shares (2013: 4,170,833 shares) (1,219) (167) Accumulated deficit (4,804) (5,105) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 210 347 Total Stockholders’ equity 538 1,301 Total equity 801 1,546 Total liabilities and equity 6,893 6,449 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-5Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) 607 415 (52) (Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax — — (1) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 405 514 533 Share-based compensation 133 88 52 Net (gain) loss on sale of assets (10) (2) (20) (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt 3 114 161 Results relating to equity-accounted investees (8) (58) 27 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in receivables and other current assets (109) (35) 2 (Increase) decrease in inventories (42) (22) (61) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 217 (76) 61 Decrease (increase) in other non-current assets 30 13 26 Exchange differences 246 (62) (28) Other items (4) 2 22 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 1,468 891 722 Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of identified intangible assets (36) (35) (29) Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment (329) (215) (251) Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment 4 6 2 Proceeds from disposals of assets held for sale 6 — — Purchase of interests in businesses (8) (1) (2) Proceeds from sale of interests in businesses 1 3 26 Proceeds from return of equity investment — 4 12 Other (25) (2) (1) Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities (387) (240) (243) Cash flows from financing activities:Net (repayments) borrowings of short-term debt (17) (11) — Amounts drawn under the revolving credit facility 800 530 760 Repayments under the revolving credit facility (950) (610) (530) Repurchase of long-term debt (92) (2,429) (1,676) Principal payments on long-term debt (15) (18) (20) Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt 1,150 2,251 967 Cash paid for debt issuance costs (16) (23) (9) Proceeds from the sale of warrants 134 — — Cash paid for Notes hedge derivatives (208) — — Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (50) (48) (40) Purchase of non-controlling interest shares — (12) — Cash proceeds from exercise of stock options 145 177 14 Purchase of treasury shares (1,435) (405) (40) Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities (554) (598) (574) Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations 527 53 (95) Cash flows from discontinued operations:Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities — — — Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities — — (45) Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities — — — Net cash provided by (used for) discontinued operations — — (45) Net cash provided by (used for) continuing and discontinued operations 527 53 (140) Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash positions (12) — 14 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 515 53 (126) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 670 617 743 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 1,185 670 617 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-6Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Consolidated Statements of Changes in EquityFor the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Outstandingnumber ofshares (inthousands) Commonstock Capital inexcess ofpar value Treasurysharesat cost Accumulateddeficit Accumulatedothercomprehensiveincome (loss) Totalstockholders’equity Non-controllinginterests Totalequity Balance as of January 1, 2012 247,837 51 6,047 (57) (5,219) 323 1,145 212 1,357 Net income (loss) (115) (115) 63 (52) Other comprehensive income (23) (23) (23) Share-based compensation plans 52 52 52 Treasury shares (1,245) 8 (34) (26) (26) Shares issued pursuant to stock awards 2,434 (19) 33 14 14 Equity classified financial instruments 2 2 2 Dividends non-controlling interests (40) (40) Balance as of December 31, 2012 249,026 51 6,090 (58) (5,334) 300 1,049 235 1,284 Net income (loss) 348 348 67 415 Other comprehensive income 47 47 47 Share-based compensation plans 88 88 88 Treasury shares (11,072) (405) (405) (405) Shares issued pursuant to stock awards 9,627 296 (119) 177 177 Dividends non-controlling interests (48) (48) Purchase of non-controlling interest shares (3) (3) (9) (12) Balance as of December 31, 2013 247,581 51 6,175 (167) (5,105) 347 1,301 245 1,546 Net income (loss) 539 539 68 607 Other comprehensive income (137) (137) (137) Share-based compensation plans 125 125 125 Treasury shares (23,246) (1,435) (1,435) (1,435) Shares issued pursuant to stock awards 8,245 383 (238) 145 145 Dividends non-controlling interests (50) (50) Balance as of December 31, 2014 232,580 51 6,300 (1,219) (4,804) 210 538 263 801 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-7Table of ContentsNXP Semiconductors N.V.Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsAll amounts in millions of $ unless otherwise stated1 The CompanyNXP Semiconductors N.V. (including our subsidiaries, referred to collectively herein as “NXP”, “NXP Semiconductors”, “we”, “our”, “us” and the“Company”) is a global semiconductor company incorporated in the Netherlands as a Dutch public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap).We provide leading High Performance Mixed Signal and Standard Product solutions that leverage our deep application insight and our technology andmanufacturing expertise in radio frequency, analog, power management, interface, security and digital processing products. Our product solutions are used ina wide range of application areas including: automotive, identification, wireless infrastructure, lighting, industrial, mobile, consumer, computing andsoftware solutions for mobile phones.2 Significant Accounting PoliciesBasis of presentationThe Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including NXP B.V. and allentities in which the Company holds a direct or indirect controlling interest, in such a way that the Company would have the power to direct the activities ofthe entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits of theentity that could be potentially significant to the Company. Investments in companies in which the Company exercises significant influence but does notcontrol, are accounted for using the equity method. The Company’s share of the net income of these companies is included in results relating to equity-accounted investees in the consolidated statements of operations.All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Net income (loss) includes the portion ofthe earnings of subsidiaries applicable to non-controlling interests. The income (loss) and equity attributable to non-controlling interests are disclosedseparately in the consolidated statements of operations and in the consolidated balance sheets under non-controlling interests.ReclassificationsCertain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.Certain prior year amounts relating to the cost basis of property, plant and equipment balances and the accumulated depreciation associated withbuildings, machinery and installations and other equipment were adjusted, due to an immaterial error. The accumulated depreciation and cost basis of certainfully depreciated assets had been incorrectly presented resulting in an offsetting understatement of both the cost basis of property, plant and equipment andtotal accumulated depreciation. There was no change to total property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2013 due to this adjustment.Use of estimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect thereported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts ofrevenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Fair value measurementsFair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with a market participant at themeasurement date. In the absence of active markets for an identical asset or liability, we develop assumptions based on market observable data and, in theabsence of such data, utilize internal information that we consider to be consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction thatoccurs at the measurement date. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our marketassumptions. Priority is given to observable inputs. These two types of inputs form the basis for the following fair value hierarchy. • Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. • Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar or identical assets or liabilities in markets thatare not active; and valuations based on models where the inputs are observable or where the significant value drivers are observable. • Level 3: Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.Foreign currenciesThe Company uses the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency. The functional currency of the Holding company is the euro. For consolidation purposes,the financial statements of the entities within the Company with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, are translated into U.S. dollars. Assets andliabilities are translated using the exchange rates on the applicable balance sheet dates. Income and expense items in the statements of operations, statementsof comprehensive income and statements of cash flows are translated at monthly exchange rates in the periods involved. F-8Table of ContentsThe effects of translating the financial position and results of operations from functional currencies to reporting currency are recognized in othercomprehensive income and presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholder’s equity. If theoperation is a non-wholly owned subsidiary, then the relevant proportionate share of the translation difference is recorded under non-controlling interests.The following table sets out the exchange rates for U.S. dollars into euros applicable for translation of NXP’s financial statements for the periodsspecified. $ per € 1 period end average(1) high low 2014 1.2155 1.3262 1.2155 1.3857 2013 1.3765 1.3285 1.2818 1.3765 2012 1.3190 1.2887 1.2238 1.3347 (1)The average rates are the average rates based on monthly quotations.The functional currency of foreign entities is generally the local currency, unless the primary economic environment requires the use of anothercurrency. Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions orvaluation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of operations, except when theforeign exchange exposure is part of a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge accounting relationship, in which case the related foreign exchangegains and losses are recognized directly in other comprehensive income to the extent that the hedge is effective and presented as a separate component ofaccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, such differences are recognized inthe statement of operations. Currency gains and losses on intercompany loans that have the nature of a permanent investment are recognized as translationdifferences in other comprehensive income and are presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within equity.Derivative financial instruments including hedge accountingThe Company uses derivative financial instruments in the management of its foreign currency risks and the input costs of gold for a portion of ouranticipated purchases within the next 12 months.The Company measures all derivative financial instruments based on fair values derived from market prices of the instruments or from option pricingmodels, as appropriate, and records these as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair values are immediately recognized in the statement ofoperations unless cash flow hedge accounting is applied.Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated othercomprehensive income (loss), until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. The application of cash flow hedgeaccounting for foreign currency risks is limited to transactions that represent a substantial currency risk that could materially affect the financial position ofthe Company.Foreign currency gains or losses arising from the translation of a financial liability designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation arerecognized directly in other comprehensive income, to the extent that the hedge is effective, and are presented as a separate component of accumulated othercomprehensive income (loss) within stockholders equity.To the extent that a hedge is ineffective, the ineffective portion of the fair value change is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.When the hedged net investment is disposed of, the corresponding amount in the accumulated other comprehensive income is transferred to the statement ofoperations as part of the profit or loss on disposal.On initial designation of the hedge relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item, the Company documents this relationship,including the risk management objectives and strategy in undertaking the hedge transaction and the hedged risk, together with the methods that will be usedto assess the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. The Company makes an assessment, both at the inception of the hedge relationship as well as on anongoing basis, of whether the hedging instruments are expected to be “highly effective” in offsetting the changes in the fair value or cash flows of therespective hedged items attributable to the hedged risk, and whether the actual results of each hedge are within a range of 80-125 percent.When cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued because it is not probable that a forecasted transaction will occur within a period of two monthsfrom the originally forecasted transaction date, the Company continues to carry the derivative on the consolidated balance sheets at its fair value, and gainsand losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are recognized immediately in earnings. In situations in which hedge accounting isdiscontinued, the Company continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, and recognizes any changes in its fair valuein earnings.Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and short-term highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at acquisition thatare readily convertible into known amounts of cash. It also includes cash balances that cannot be freely repatriated based on certain country restrictions. Cashand cash equivalents are stated at face value which approximates fair value. F-9Table of ContentsReceivablesReceivables are carried at amortized cost, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and net of rebates and other contingent discounts granted todistributors. When circumstances indicate a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligation to us is impaired, we record an allowance againstamounts due and value the receivable at the amount reasonably expected to be collected. For all other customers, we evaluate our trade accounts receivablefor collectability based on numerous factors including objective evidence about credit-risk concentration, collective debt risk based on average historicallosses, and specific circumstances such as serious adverse economic conditions in a specific country or region.InventoriesInventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, less advance payments on work in progress. The cost of inventories is determined using the first-in,first-out (FIFO) method. An allowance is made for the estimated losses due to obsolescence. This allowance is determined for groups of products based onpurchases in the recent past and/or expected future demand and market conditions. Abnormal amounts of idle facility expense and waste are not capitalizedin inventory. The allocation of fixed production overheads to the inventory cost is based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.Property, plant and equipmentProperty, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the expected economic life of the asset. Depreciation of special tooling is also based on the straight-line method unless a depreciationmethod other than the straight-line method better represents the consumption pattern. Gains and losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment areincluded in other income and expense. Plant and equipment under capital leases are initially recorded at the lower of the fair value of the leased property orthe present value of minimum lease payments. These assets and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of thelease term or the estimated useful life of the asset.Business combinations and intangible assetsAmounts paid for acquisitions are allocated to the tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value at the date ofacquisition. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is based on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management.We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets withfinite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Acquisition-related costs, including advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other costs, are expensed inthe periods in which the costs are incurred. The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from theacquisition date. We evaluate the remaining useful life of intangible assets on a periodic basis to determine whether events and circumstances warrant arevision to the remaining useful life. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, we amortize the remaining carrying value of theintangible asset prospectively over the revised remaining useful life.Long-lived assets including goodwill and acquisition related intangible asset impairmentWe perform reviews of property, plant and equipment, and certain identifiable intangibles, excluding goodwill, to determine if facts and circumstancesindicate that the useful life is shorter than what we had originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts andcircumstances exist, we assess the recoverability of the long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the relatedasset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient torecover the recorded value of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values based on the expected discounted future cash flowsattributable to the assets or based on appraisals. Impairment losses, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.We do not amortize goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, rather such assets are required to be tested for impairment at leastannually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. We perform our goodwill and intangible assetimpairment tests annually during the fourth quarter unless a triggering event would require an expedited analysis. If a qualitative assessment is used and theCompany determines that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50%) lessthan its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test will be performed. If goodwill is quantitatively assessed for impairment, a two-step approach isapplied. First, the Company compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit in which the goodwill resides to its carrying value. The second step, ifnecessary, measures the amount of such impairment by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. Other indefinite-lived intangibleassets are quantitatively assessed for impairment, if necessary, by comparing their estimated fair values to their carrying values. If the carrying value exceedsthe fair value, the difference is recorded as an impairment.Research and developmentCosts of research and development are expensed in the period in which they are incurred, except for in-process research and development assetsacquired in business combinations, which are capitalized and, after completion, are amortized over their estimated useful lives. F-10Table of ContentsAdvertisingAdvertising costs are expensed when incurred.Debt Issuance CostsDirect costs incurred to obtain financings are capitalized and subsequently amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest rate method.Upon extinguishment of any related debt, any unamortized debt issuance costs are expensed immediately.Revenue recognitionThe Company’s revenue is derived from sales to distributors, made-to-order sales to Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and similarcustomers.Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the service has been provided, the sales price isfixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured, based on the terms and conditions of the sales contract. For made-to-order sales, these criteria aremet at the time the product is shipped and delivered to the customer and title and risk have passed to the customer. Acceptance of the product by thecustomer is generally not contractually required, since, for made-to-order customers, design approval occurs before manufacturing and subsequently deliveryfollows without further acceptance protocols. Payment terms used are those that are customary in the particular geographic market. When management hasestablished that all aforementioned conditions for revenue recognition have been met and no further post-shipment obligations exist, revenue is recognized.For sales to distributors, revenue is recognized upon sale to the distributor (sell-in accounting). The same recognition principles apply and similarterms and conditions as for sales to other customers are applied. However, for some distributors contractual arrangements are in place, which allow thesedistributors to return products if certain conditions are met. These conditions generally relate to the time period during which a return is allowed and reflectcustomary conditions in the particular geographic market. Other return conditions relate to circumstances arising at the end of a product life cycle, whencertain distributors are permitted to return products purchased during a pre-defined period after the Company has announced a product’s pendingdiscontinuance. However, long notice periods associated with these announcements prevent significant amounts of product from being returned. Repurchaseagreements with OEMs or distributors are not entered into by the Company.For sales where return rights exist, the Company has determined, based on historical data, that only a very small percentage of the sales of this type todistributors is actually returned. In accordance with this historical data, a pro rata portion of the sales to these distributors is not recognized but deferred untilthe return period has lapsed or the other return conditions no longer apply.Revenue is recorded net of sales taxes, customer discounts, rebates and other contingent discounts granted to distributors. We include shipping chargesbilled to customers in revenue and include the related shipping costs in cost of revenue.RestructuringThe provision for restructuring relates to the estimated costs of initiated restructurings that have been approved by Management. When such plansrequire discontinuance and/or closure of lines of activities, the anticipated costs of closure or discontinuance are recorded at fair value when the liability hasbeen incurred. The Company determines the fair value based on discounted projected cash flows in the absence of other observable inputs such as quotedprices. The restructuring liability includes the estimated cost of termination benefits provided to former or inactive employees after employment but beforeretirement, costs to terminate leases and other contracts, and selling costs associated with assets held for sale and other costs related to the closure of facilities.One-time employee termination benefits are recognized ratably over the future service period when those employees are required to render services to theCompany, if that period exceeds 60 days or a longer legal notification period. However, generally, employee termination benefits are covered by a contract oran ongoing benefit arrangement and are recognized when it is probable that the employees will be entitled to the benefits and the amounts can be reasonablyestimated.Financial income and expenseFinancial income comprises interest income on funds invested and the net gain on the disposal of other financial assets.Financial expense comprises interest expense on borrowings, accretion of the discount on provisions and contingent consideration, losses on disposalof financial assets, impairment losses recognized on financial assets (other than trade receivables) and losses on hedging instruments recognized in thestatement of operations.Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of property, plant and equipment are recognized in thestatement of operations using the effective interest method.Foreign currency gains and losses, not related to accounts receivable, accounts payable and intercompany current accounts, are reported on a net basisas either financial income or financial expense in the statement of operations depending on whether foreign currency movements are in a net gain or net lossposition. Foreign currency gains and losses on accounts receivable, accounts payable and intercompany current accounts that are not hedged in a netinvestment hedge are reported under cost of revenue in the statement of operations. F-11Table of ContentsIncome taxesDeferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets andliabilities and their reported amounts. Measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities is based upon the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxableincome in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax liabilities for withholding taxes on dividendsfrom subsidiaries are recognized in situations where the company does not consider the earnings indefinitely reinvested and to the extent that thesewithholding taxes are not expected to be refundable.Deferred tax assets, including assets arising from loss carryforwards, are recognized, net of a valuation allowance, if based upon the available evidenceit is more likely than not that the asset will be realized.The income tax benefit from an uncertain tax position is recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained uponexamination by the relevant taxing authorities. The income tax benefit recognized is measured based on the largest benefit that is more than 50% likely to berealized upon resolution of the uncertainty. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits and the related interest and penalties is recorded under accruedliabilities and other non-current liabilities in the balance sheet based on the timing of the expected payment. Penalties are recorded as income tax expense,whereas interest is reported as financial expense in the statement of operations.Postretirement benefitsThe Company’s employees participate in pension and other postretirement benefit plans in many countries. The costs of pension and otherpostretirement benefits and related assets and liabilities with respect to the Company’s employees participating in defined-benefit plans are based uponactuarial valuations. Some of the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans are funded with plan assets that have been segregated and restricted in a trust,foundation or insurance company to provide for the pension benefits to which the Company has committed itself.The net pension liability or asset recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the projecteddefined-benefit obligation less the fair value of plan assets at the balance sheet date.Most of the Company’s plans are unfunded and result in a pension provision or a net pension liability.The projected defined-benefit obligation is calculated annually by qualified actuaries using the projected unit credit method. For the Company’s majorplans, the discount rate is derived from market yields on high quality corporate bonds. Plans in countries without a deep corporate bond market use adiscount rate based on the local government bond rates.Pension costs in respect of defined-benefit pension plans primarily represent the increase in the actuarial present value of the obligation for pensionbenefits based on employee service during the year and the interest on this obligation in respect of employee service in previous years, net of the expectedreturn on plan assets and net of employee contributions.Actuarial gains and losses arise mainly from changes in actuarial assumptions and differences between actuarial assumptions and what has actuallyoccurred. They are recognized in the statement of operations, over the expected average remaining service periods of the employees only to the extent thattheir net cumulative amount exceeds 10% of the greater of the present value of the obligation or of the fair value of plan assets at the end of the previous year(the corridor). Events which invoke a curtailment or a settlement of a benefit plan will be recognized in our statement of operations.In calculating obligation and expense, the Company is required to select actuarial assumptions. These assumptions include discount rate, expectedlong-term rate of return on plan assets and rates of increase in compensation costs determined based on current market conditions, historical information andconsultation with and input from our actuaries. Changes in the key assumptions can have a significant impact to the projected benefit obligations, fundingrequirements and periodic pension cost incurred. A sensitivity analysis is provided in note 15, “Postretirement Benefit Plans”.Unrecognized prior-service costs related to pension plans are amortized to the statements of operations over the average remaining service period of theactive employees.Contributions to defined-contribution and multi-employer pension plans are recognized as an expense in the statements of operations as incurred.If the projected benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets, we recognize in the consolidated balance sheet a liability that equals theexcess. If the fair value of plan assets exceeds the projected benefit obligation, we recognize in the balance sheet an asset that equals the excess.The Company determines the fair value of plan assets based on quoted prices or comparable prices for non-quoted assets. For a defined-benefit pensionplan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other postretirement defined benefit plan it is the accumulated postretirement benefitobligation.The Company recognizes as a component of other comprehensive income, net of taxes, the gains or losses and prior service costs that arise during theyear but are not recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, including thegains or losses and the prior services costs are adjusted as they are subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs.For all of the Company’s defined pension benefit plans, the measurement date is year-end. F-12Table of ContentsShare-based compensationWe recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards based on the grant-date estimated fair values, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. We usethe Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the estimated fair value for certain awards. Share-based compensation cost for restricted share units(“RSU”s) with time-based vesting is measured based on the closing fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant, reduced by the presentvalue of the estimated expected future dividends, and then multiplied by the number of RSUs granted. Share-based compensation cost for performance-basedshare units (“PSU”s) granted with performance or market conditions is measured using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant.The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service periods in ourConsolidated Statements of Operations. For stock options and RSUs, the grant-date value, less estimated pre-vest forfeitures, is expensed on a straight-linebasis over the vesting period. PSUs are expensed using a graded vesting schedule. The vesting period for stock options is generally four years, for RSUs isgenerally three years and PSUs is one to three years.Earnings per shareBasic earnings per share attributable to stockholders is calculated by dividing net income or loss attributable to stockholders of the Company by theweighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.To determine diluted share count, we apply the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of outstanding stock option shares, RSUs, PSUsand Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) shares. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising share-based awards,the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of excess tax benefits that would be recorded inadditional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.Concentration of riskFinancial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, that may potentially subject NXP to concentrations of credit risk, consist principallyof cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, long-term investments, accounts receivable and forward contracts.We sell our products to OEMs and to distributors in various markets, who resell these products to OEMs, or their subcontract manufacturers. One of ourdistributors accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2014, 11% in 2013 and 12% in 2012 and one other distributor accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2014.No other distributor accounted for greater than 10% of our revenue for 2014, 2013 or 2012. No individual OEM for which we had direct sales to accountedfor more than 10% of our revenue for 2014, 2013 or 2012.Credit exposure related to NXP’s foreign currency forward contracts is limited to the realized and unrealized gains on these contracts.NXP is party to certain hedge transactions related to its 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes. NXP is subject to the risk that the counterparties to thesetransactions may not be able to fulfill their obligations under these hedge transactions.NXP purchased options and issued warrants to hedge potential cash payments in excess of the principal and contractual interest related to its 2019Cash Convertible Senior Notes, which were issued during fiscal 2014. The 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Note hedges and warrants are adjusted to fair valueeach reporting period and unrealized gains and losses are reflected in NXP’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Because the fair value of the 2019 CashConvertible Senior Notes embedded conversion derivative and the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes hedges are designed to have similar offsettingvalues, there was no impact to NXP’s Consolidated Statements of Operations relating to these adjustments to fair value, the fair value adjustment for thewarrant resulted in an unrealized loss of $2 million in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.The Company is using outside suppliers or foundries for a portion of its manufacturing capacity.We have operations in Europe and Asia subject to collective bargaining agreements which could pose a risk to the Company in the near term but we donot expect that our operations will be disrupted if such is the case.Accounting standards adopted in 2014The following accounting pronouncements became effective in 2014 and were adopted by the Company • ASU No. 2013-05 “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment uponDerecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity”On March 4, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, which indicates that the entire amount of a cumulative translation adjustment (CTA) relatedto an entity’s investment in a foreign entity should be released when there has been a: • Sale of a subsidiary or group of net assets within a foreign entity and the sale represents the substantially complete liquidation of theinvestment in the foreign entity. • Loss of a controlling financial interest in an investment in a foreign entity (i.e., the foreign entity is deconsolidated). • Step acquisition for a foreign entity (i.e., when an entity has changed from applying the equity method for an investment in a foreignentity to consolidating the foreign entity).The ASU does not change the requirement to release a pro rata portion of the CTA of the foreign entity into earnings for a partial sale of anequity method investment in a foreign entity. The effective date for NXP was January 1, 2014. There F-13Table of Contentswas no impact on the Company’s financial statements. In the event that NXP enters into a divestment, the ASU could have a material impact tothe financial statements. • ASU No. 2013-11 “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a TaxCredit Carryforward Exists”On July 18, 2013 the FASB issued ASU 2013-11 which provides guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit(UTB) when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists.Under the ASU, an entity must present a UTB, or a portion of a UTB, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset (DTA) for anNOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except when: • An NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available as of the reporting date under the governing tax lawto settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position. • The entity does not intend to use the DTA for this purpose.If either of these conditions exists, an entity should present a UTB in the financial statements as a liability and should not net the UTB with aDTA. New recurring disclosures are not required because the ASU does not affect the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positionsunder ASC 740.The effective date for NXP was January 1, 2014.The ASU had no significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.New standards to be adopted after 2014 • ASU No. 2014-08 “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): ReportingDiscontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”On April 10, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation in ASC 205-20 and requires entitiesto provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued- operationscriteria. A disposal of a component of an entity or group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if thedisposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results as determined when thecomponent or group of components: (i)Meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or (ii)Is disposed of by sale or (iii)Is disposed of other than by saleThe ASU also expands the scope of ASC 205-20 to disposals of equity method investments and businesses that, upon initial acquisition, qualifyas held for sale.The ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) or components initiallyclassified as held for sale in periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (orclassifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company hasthe intention to implement the provisions of ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2015. • ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”On May 28, 2014 the FASB and IASB issued their final standard on revenue from contracts with customers. The standard, issued as ASU 2014-09by the FASB and as IFRS 15 by the IASB, outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising fromcontracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle ofthe revenue model is that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount thatreflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” In applying the revenue model tocontracts within its scope, an entity will: • Identify the contract(s) with a customer (step 1) • Identify the performance obligations in the contract (step 2) • Determine the transaction price (step 3) • Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract (step 4) • Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation (step 5)Compared with current US GAAP, the ASU also requires significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition.The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016,for public entities. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in the ASU. TheCompany will implement the provisions of ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 willhave on its consolidated financial statements and F-14Table of Contentsrelated disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoingfinancial reporting. • ASU No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements- Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)”On August 27, 2014 the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, which provides guidance on determining when and how reporting entities must disclosegoing-concern uncertainties in their financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments ofan entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity’s financial statements. Further, an entitymust provide certain disclosures if there is “substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.”The ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.NXP will apply the ASU prospectively as from January 1, 2017. The ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’sfinancial statements.3 Acquisitions and Divestments2014 and 2013There were no significant acquisitions and divestments in 2014 and 2013.2012In April 2012, the Company acquired Catena, an electronic design and IP company. The purchase price consideration of $20 million, including theissuance of 599,000 treasury shares with a fair value of $14 million was allocated to goodwill of $11 million, other intangible assets with an amortizationperiod of five years of $9 million, assets acquired of $7 million and liabilities assumed of $7 million. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.The results of Catena are consolidated in the Automotive operating segment that is part of the reportable segment HPMS.On July 19, 2012, we sold the High Speed Data Converter business (a product line of the High Performance Mixed Signal segment) to IntegratedDevice Technology (IDT) for $31 million. The gain on the sale of $19 million is included in other income (expense).On January 4, 2012, Trident Microsystems, Inc., in which we held a 60% shareholding after the sale in 2010 of our digital television and set-top-boxbusiness line, filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and was subsequently delisted from the NASDAQ. An initialdistribution to shareholders took place on December 21, 2012. In view of the aforementioned distribution, NXP B.V. returned its shares in Trident. See note 7“Investments in Equity Accounted Investees” for an additional discussion of Trident.4 Supplemental Financial InformationStatement of Operations InformationDepreciation, amortization and impairmentDepreciation and amortization, including impairment charges, are as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 219 246 247 Amortization of internal use software 31 32 24 Amortization of identified intangible assets 155 236 262 405 514 533 Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is primarily included in cost of revenue. Amortization of intangible assets is primarily reported in theselling, general and administrative expenses.Change in accounting estimateIn December 2013, we determined that the estimated useful life of the machinery and equipment used in our Standard Products front-end and back-endmanufacturing processes had increased to ten years, from the five to seven years previously estimated.We believe that the change in estimated useful life better reflects the future usage of this equipment. The effect of this change was recognizedprospectively as a change in accounting estimate beginning January 1, 2014. The change in estimate resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense ofapproximately $26 million for the year ending December 31, 2014.Foreign exchange differencesIn 2014, cost of revenue included foreign exchange differences amounting to a profit of $4 million (2013: a loss of less than $1 million; 2012: a loss of$4 million). F-15Table of ContentsFinancial income and expense 2014 2013 2012 Interest income 3 3 4 Interest expense (145) (182) (270) Total interest expense, net (142) (179) (266) Net gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt (3) (114) (161) Foreign exchange rate results (246) 62 28 Miscellaneous financing costs/income, net (19) (43) (38) Total other financial income and expense (268) (95) (171) Total (410) (274) (437) The Company has applied net investment hedging since May, 2011. The U.S. dollar exposure of the net investment in U.S. dollar functional currencysubsidiaries of $1.7 billion has been hedged by our U.S. dollar-denominated notes. As a result in 2014 a charge of $214 million (2013: a benefit of $68million; 2012: a benefit of $26 million) was recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) relating to the foreign currency result on the U.S. dollar-denominated notes that are recorded in a euro functional currency entity.Cash Flow Information 2014 2013 2012 Net cash paid during the period for: Interest 138 174 292 Income taxes 24 34 28 Net gain (loss) on sale of assets: Cash proceeds from the sale of assets 11 6 31 Book value of these assets (10) (4) (12) Non-cash gains (losses) 9 — 1 10 2 20 Non-cash investing information:Assets received in lieu of cash from the sale of businesses:Fair value of available-for-sale securities 9 — — Non-cash financing information:Exchange of Term Loan A1 for Term Loan E 400 — — Exchange of Term Loan C for Term Loan D — 400 — Other items:Other items consists of the following non-cash element in income:Non-cash interest cost due to applying effective interest method 3 2 22 Others (7) — — (4) 2 22 Cash flows from financing activities in 2013 included $12 million in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 40% non-controlling interestshare from Jilin Sino-Microelectronics Co. Ltd.5 Restructuring ChargesAt each reporting date, we evaluate our restructuring liabilities, which consist primarily of termination benefits, to ensure that our accruals are stillappropriate. The restructuring liability balance as of December 31, 2014 primarily relates to: • Workforce reduction accrual of $7 million for redundancy at our ICN 8 wafer fab in Nijmegen; • Workforce reduction accrual of $5 million for redundancy at our wafer fab in Hamburg; • 2012 OPEX Reduction Program accrual of $12 million. The OPEX Reduction Program is expected to be completed by the third quarter of 2015; • Accruals of $16 million for individual cases that arose in 2014.There were no material new restructuring projects in 2014 and 2013The most significant projects for restructuring in 2012In 2012 we announced a cost savings and restructuring initiative, designed to improve operational efficiency and to competitively position theCompany for sustainable growth. We recorded a restructuring charge of $90 million in 2012 associated with this initiative classified within the statement ofoperations under cost of goods sold of $17 million, mainly relating to the consolidation of MOS technologies from our German fabrication facility inHamburg to the Company’s 8-inch Dutch facility in Nijmegen, and selling, general and administrative of $52 million and research and development of $21million, to consolidate resources. This charge primarily related to a worldwide workforce reduction of approximately 650 employees, with the majority of theheadcount reductions in Europe and the U.S. The restructuring liabilities of $90 million recognized for this initiative were reflected within current liabilities($64 million) and non-current liabilities ($26 million) as of December 31, 2012 and primarily related to termination and employee benefit related costs. F-16Table of ContentsThe following table presents the changes in the position of restructuring liabilities in 2014 by segment: BalanceJanuary 1,2014 Additions Utilized Released Otherchanges(1) BalanceDecember 31,2014 HPMS 46 6 (29) (4) (5) 14 SP 31 14 (35) (4) (1) 5 Corporate and Other 40 24 (34) (8) (1) 21 117 44 (98) (16) (7) 40 (1)Other changes primarily related to translation differences and internal transfersThe total restructuring liability as of December 31, 2014 of $40 million is classified in the balance sheet under current liabilities ($37 million) andnon-current liabilities ($3 million).In 2014 the Company recorded $44 million of additional restructuring liabilities which largely consisted of workforce reduction charges as a result ofredundancy at our ICN 8 wafer fab in Nijmegen ($16 million) and our wafer fab in Hamburg ($5 million), workforce reduction charges of $4 million from theclosure of the product line Standard Linear in Hamburg and $4 million from the transfer of R&D activities of Smart Analog from Nijmegen to other locations.Releases of restructuring liabilities of $16 million were recorded in 2014. These releases related mainly to the earlier OPEX reduction program and theworkforce reduction actions we took in 2014.The utilization of the restructuring liabilities mainly reflects the execution of ongoing restructuring programs the Company initiated in earlier years.The following table presents the changes in the position of restructuring liabilities in 2013 by segment: BalanceJanuary 1,2013 Additions Utilized Released Otherchanges(1) BalanceDecember 31,2013 HPMS 57 3 (23) (4) 13 46 SP 41 6 (3) (7) (6) 31 Corporate and Other 72 18 (39) (10) (1) 40 170 27 (65) (21) 6 117 (1)Other changes primarily related to translation differences and internal transfersThe total restructuring liability as of December 31, 2013 of $117 million is classified in the balance sheet under current liabilities ($103 million) andnon-current liabilities ($14 million).In 2013 the Company recorded $27 million of additional restructuring liabilities which largely consisted of $16 million stemming from onerouscontracts relating to leased office buildings in the Netherlands and France and $8 million of termination benefits related to additional workforce reductionsas part of its closure of ICN 4 and ICN 6.Releases of restructuring liabilities of $21 million were recorded in 2013. These releases related mainly to liabilities for the closure of ICN 4 and ICN 6(partly reversed) and liabilities related to other workforce reduction plans.The utilization of the restructuring liabilities mainly reflects the execution of ongoing restructuring programs the Company initiated in earlier years.The components of restructuring charges less releases recorded in the liabilities in 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Personnel lay-off costs 43 10 101 Lease and Contract Terminations 1 17 2 Release of provisions/accruals (16) (21) (4) Net restructuring charges 28 6 99 F-17Table of ContentsThe following table summarizes the significant activity within, and components of, the Company’s restructuring obligations: Personnel lay-offcosts Lease and ContractTerminations Total Balance at December 31, 2012 167 3 170 Expense (8) 14 6 Utilized 1) (54) (11) (65) Other changes 2) 5 1 6 Balance at December 31, 2013 110 7 117 Expense 29 (1) 28 Utilized 1) (93) (5) (98) Other changes 2) (7) — (7) Balance at December 31, 2014 39 1 40 1) Represents cash payments.2) Other changes primarily related to translation differences.The restructuring charges less releases recorded in operating income are included in the following line items in the statement of operations: 2014 2013 2012 Cost of revenue 16 — 18 Selling, general and administrative 3 7 59 Research & development 9 (1) 22 Net restructuring charges 28 6 99 6 Provision for Income TaxesIn 2014, NXP generated income before income taxes of $639 million (2013: $377 million; 2012: $25 million loss). The components of income (loss)before income taxes are as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Netherlands 398 205 (93) Foreign 241 172 68 639 377 (25) The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Current taxes: Netherlands (7) (10) (1) Foreign (32) (17) (20) (39) (27) (21) Deferred taxes:Netherlands 2 1 5 Foreign (3) 6 15 (1) 7 20 Total provision for income taxes (40) (20) (1) A reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate in the Netherlands as a percentage of income (loss) before income taxes and the effective income taxrate is as follows: (in percentages) 2014 2013 2012 Statutory income tax in the Netherlands 25.0 25.0 25.0 Increase (reduction) in rate resulting from: Rate differential local statutory rates versus statutory rate of the Netherlands (2.5) (3.4) 64.0 Net change in valuation allowance 2.4 5.3 (178.0) Prior year adjustments 0.5 (0.8) 5.2 Non-taxable income (0.3) (1.1) 41.6 Non-tax-deductible expenses/losses 5.6 6.6 (69.6) Other taxes and tax rate changes — 2.3 18.2 Withholding taxes 1.3 0.8 (7.6) Unrecognized tax benefits 0.6 0.8 (24.8) Tax incentives (26.3) (30.2) 122.0 Effective tax rate 6.3% 5.3% (4.0)% F-18Table of ContentsFor the year 2014 the main part of tax incentives includes a tax benefit resulting from the application of the Dutch “Innovation box” tax rules. TheCompany also benefits from income tax holiday incentives in certain jurisdictions which provide that we pay reduced income taxes in those jurisdictions fora fixed period of time that varies depending on the jurisdiction. The predominant income tax holiday is expected to expire at the end of 2021. The related taxbenefit of 4.3% (2013: 6.5%) is also recorded above within tax incentives.The Company has considered all items of income (including items recorded in other comprehensive income) in determining the amount of tax benefitthat should be allocated to a loss from continuing operations. As a result, during 2012 we recorded $8 million of non-cash tax benefit on a loss fromcontinuing operations arising in one of our jurisdictions for the year ended December 31, 2012 which was exactly offset by $8 million income tax expense inother comprehensive income. Because the income tax expense on other comprehensive income is equal to the income tax benefit from continuing operations,our net deferred tax positions at December 31, 2012 were not impacted by this tax allocation.Deferred tax assets and liabilitiesThe principal components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented below: 2014 2013 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Intangible assets 2 (120) 5 (160) Property, plant and equipment 19 (35) 27 (36) Inventories 2 — 2 — Receivables — — — (1) Other assets 1 (1) 1 — Liabilities: Pensions 51 — 36 (5) Restructuring 6 — 27 — Other 25 — 24 — Long-term debt — — — (23) Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries — (31) — (31) Tax loss carryforwards (including tax credit carryforwards) 659 — 686 — Total gross deferred tax assets (liabilities) 765 (187) 808 (256) Net deferred tax position 578 552 Valuation allowances (627) (607) Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) (49) (55) The Company has significant deferred tax assets resulting from net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards and deductible temporarydifferences that may reduce taxable income in future periods. Valuation allowances have been established for deferred tax assets based on a “more likely thannot” threshold. The realization of our deferred tax assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforwardperiods provided for in the tax law for each applicable tax jurisdiction. The valuation allowance increased by $20 million during 2014 (2013: $18 millionincrease). When the Company’s operating performance improves on a sustained basis, our conclusion regarding the need for such valuation allowance couldchange.Subsequently recognized tax benefits related to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2014, will be allocated as follows:$620 million of income tax benefit that would be reported in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, $7 million to additional paid-in capital.After the recognition of the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, a net deferred tax liability remains of $49 million at December 31, 2014(2013: $55 million). This net deferred tax liability relates to certain taxable temporary differences reversing outside the tax loss carryforward periods, deferredtax liabilities recorded for profitable entities and deferred tax liabilities for withholding taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries.At December 31, 2014 tax loss carryforwards of $2,463 million will expire as follows: BalanceDecember 31, Scheduled expiration 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2024 later unlimited Tax loss carryforwards 2,463 143 688 448 10 193 198 152 631 The Company also has tax credit carryforwards of $95 million, which are available to offset future tax, if any, and which will expire as follows: BalanceDecember 31, Scheduled expiration 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2024 later unlimited Tax credit carryforwards 95 — — — — — — 10 85 F-19Table of ContentsThe classification of the deferred tax assets and liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is as follows: 2014 2013 Deferred tax assets within current assets 8 11 Deferred tax assets within other non-current assets 19 24 Deferred tax liabilities within accrued liabilities — (2) Deferred tax liabilities within other non-current liabilities (76) (88) (49) (55) The net income tax payable (excluding the liability for unrecognized tax benefits) as of December 31, 2014 amounted to $9 million (2013: $6 millionpayable) and includes amounts directly payable to or receivable from tax authorities.As from 2009 the Company intends to repatriate the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries. Consequently, the Company has recognized a deferredincome tax liability of $31 million at December 31, 2014 (2013: $31 million) for the additional withholding taxes payable upon the future remittances ofthese earnings of foreign subsidiaries.A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Balance as of January 1, 143 139 169 Increases from tax positions taken during prior periods — 1 16 Decreases from tax positions taken during prior periods (21) (4) (25) Increases from tax positions taken during current period 3 7 2 Decreases relating to settlements with the tax authorities — — (23) Balance as of December 31, 125 143 139 Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2014, $23 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. All other unrecognized taxbenefits, if recognized, would not affect the effective tax rate as these would be offset by compensating adjustments in the Company’s deferred tax assets thatwould be subject to valuation allowance based on conditions existing at the reporting date.The Company classifies interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as financial expense and penalties as income tax expense. The total relatedinterest and penalties recorded during the year 2014 amounted to $3 million (2013: $1 million; 2012: $(5) million). As of December 31, 2014 the Companyhas recognized a liability for related interest and penalties of $7 million (2013: $4 million; 2012: $3 million). It is reasonably possible that the total amountof unrecognized tax benefits may significantly increase/decrease within the next 12 months of the reporting date due to, for example, completion of taxexaminations; however, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible change cannot be made.Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions (the Netherlands, Germany, USA, China, Taiwan, Thailand and the Philippines)are 2009 through 2014.7 Investments in Equity-accounted InvesteesResults relating to equity-accounted investees 2014 2013 2012 Company’s share in income (loss) 8 7 7 Other results — 51 (34) 8 58 (27) Company’s share in income (loss) 2014 2013 2012 ASMC 2 1 3 ASEN 6 6 4 8 7 7 On January 4, 2012, Trident and one of its subsidiaries, Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd., filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the UnitedStates Bankruptcy code, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware and was subsequently delisted from the NASDAQ. The U.S. BankruptcyCourt approved the plan of liquidation and entered an order confirming such plan on December 13, 2012. An initial distribution to shareholders took placeon December 21, 2012. In view of the aforementioned distribution, NXP B.V. returned its shares in Trident. F-20Table of ContentsOther resultsOther results relating to equity-accounted investees amounted to a gain of $51 million in 2013. The gain in 2013 primarily reflects a $46 millionrelease of the contingent liability related to an arbitration commenced by ST. By ruling of April 2, 2013, the ICC arbitration tribunal dismissed all claimsmade by ST in this arbitration. No appeal is available to ST. Based on this award, the provision amounting to $46 million, established in 2012, was released.In 2012, a loss of $46 million related to extra provisions for the above mentioned legal claim of ST and a gain of $12 million related to a partial recovery ofour equity investment in Trident are included.Investments in equity-accounted investeesThe changes in 2014 and 2013 are as follows: 2014 2013 Balance as of January 1 52 45 Changes: Acquisitions/additions 12 — Deductions — — Share in income (loss) 8 7 Translation and exchange rate differences (1) — Balance as of December 31 71 52 The total carrying value of investments in equity-accounted investees is summarized as follows: 2014 2013 Shareholding % Amount Shareholding % Amount ASMC 27 20 27 18 ASEN 40 40 40 34 Others 11 — 71 52 Investments in equity-accounted investees are included in Corporate and Other.The fair value of NXP’s shareholding in the publicly listed company ASMC based on the quoted market price at December 31, 2014 is $35 million.8 Earnings per shareThe computation of earnings per share (EPS) is presented in the following table: 2014 2013 2012 Income (loss) from continuing operations 607 415 (53) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests 68 67 63 Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to stockholders 539 348 (116) Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to stockholders — — 1 Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders 539 348 (115) Weighted average number of shares outstanding (after deduction of treasury shares) during theyear (in thousands) 237,954 248,526 248,064 Plus incremental shares from assumed conversion of:Options 6,753 5,004 — Restricted Share Unites, Performance Share Units and Equity Rights 3,902 1,520 — Dilutive potential common share 10,655 6,524 — Adjusted weighted average number of shares outstanding (after deduction of treasury shares)during the year (in thousands) 1) 248,609 255,050 248,064 Basic EPS attributable to stockholders in $:Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.27 1.40 (0.46) Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — Net income (loss) 2.27 1.40 (0.46) Diluted EPS attributable to stockholders in $:Income (loss) from continuing operations 2.17 1.36 (0.46) Income (loss) from discontinued operations — — — Net income (loss) 2.17 1.36 (0.46) 1) In 2014, 1,670,519 securities (2013: 10,609,942 securities; 2012: 32,394,794 securities) that could potentially dilute basic EPS were not included inthe computation of dilutive EPSs because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for the period presented. F-21Table of Contents9 Share-based CompensationOur share-based compensation plans include the long-term incentive plans and the management equity stock option plan.Share-based compensation expense is included in the following line items in our statement of operations: 2014 2013 2012 Cost of revenue 10 8 2 Research and development 20 13 5 Selling, general and administrative 103 67 45 133 88 52 Long Term Incentive Plans (LTIP’s)The LTIP was introduced in 2010 and is a broad-based long-term retention program to attract, retain and motivate talented employees as well as alignstockholder and employee interests. The LTIP provides share-based compensation (“awards”) to both our eligible employees and non-employee directors.Awards that may be granted include performance shares, stock options and restricted shares. The number of shares authorized and available for awards asDecember 31, 2014 was approximately 4.8 million.A charge of $123 million was recorded in 2014 for the LTIP (2013: $87 million; 2012: $44 million).A summary of the activity for our LTIP’s during 2014 is presented below.Stock optionsThe options have a strike price equal to the closing share price on the grant date. The fair value of the options has been calculated using the Black-Scholes formula, using the following assumptions: • an expected life of 6.25 years, calculated in accordance with the guidance provided in SEC Staff bulletin No. 110 for plain vanilla options usingthe simplified method, since our equity shares have been publicly traded for only a limited period of time and we do not have sufficienthistorical exercise data; • a risk-free interest rate varying from 0.8% to 2.8% (2013: 1.0% to 1.9%; 2012: 0.8% to 1.3%); • no expected dividend payments; and • a volatility of 45-50% based on the volatility of a set of peer companies. Peer company data has been used given the short period of time ourshares have been publicly traded.Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. Stock options Weighted averageexerciseprice in USD Weighted averageremainingcontractual term Aggregate intrinsicvalue Outstanding at January 1, 2014 10,245,818 22.82 Granted 945,269 63.48 Exercised (2,759,035) 19.82 Forfeited (483,782) 23.39 Outstanding at December 31, 2014 7,948,270 28.66 7.8 379 Exercisable at December 31, 2014 2,840,911 19.98 7.0 160 The weighted average per share grant date fair value of stock options granted in 2014 was $29.10 (2013: $17.83; 2012: $10.44).The intrinsic value of the exercised options was $129 million (2013: $41 million; 2012: $7 million), whereas the amount received by NXP was $55million (2013: $34 million; 2012: $9 million).At December 31, 2014, there was a total of $62 million (2013: $67 million) of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options.This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years (2013: 2.9 years).Performance share unitsFinancial performance conditions Shares Weighted average grantdate fair valuein USD Outstanding at January 1, 2014 2,204,303 25.21 Granted 235,136 62.29 Vested (1,037,149) 23.32 Forfeited (78,996) 28.45 Outstanding at December 31, 2014 1,323,294 33.09 F-22Table of ContentsThe weighted average grant date fair value of performance share units granted in 2014 was $62.29 (2013: $39.59; 2012: $23.35). The fair value of theperformance share units at the time of vesting was $70 million (2013: $27 million; 2012: $1 million).Market performance conditions Shares Weighted average grantdate fair valuein USD Outstanding at January 1, 2014 1,775,000 17.54 Granted 353,549 39.29 Vested (177,500) 17.54 Forfeited — — Outstanding at December 31, 2014 1,951,049 23.27 The weighted average grant date fair value of performance share units granted in 2014 was $39.29 (2013: $17.54).At December 31, 2014, there was a total of $42 million (2013: $44 million) of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performanceshare units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years (2013: 1.8 years).Restricted share units Shares Weighted average grantdate fair valuein USD Outstanding at January 1, 2014 3,821,895 31.50 Granted 1,645,188 63.42 Vested (1,687,895) 28.44 Forfeited (221,451) 29.18 Outstanding at December 31, 2014 3,557,737 47.86 The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted share units granted in 2014 was $63.42 (2013: $39.23; 2012: $23.31). The fair value of therestricted share units at the time of vesting was $110 million (2013: $57 million; 2012: $21 million).At December 31, 2014, there was a total of $140 million (2013: $98 million) of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted shareunits. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years (2013: 2.4 years).Management Equity Stock Option Plan (“MEP”)Awards are no longer available under these plans. Current employees owning vested MEP Options may exercise such MEP Options during the five yearperiod subsequent to September 18, 2013, subject to these employees remaining employed by us and subject to the applicable laws and regulations.No charge was recorded in 2014 (2013: $1 million, 2012: $8 million) for options granted under the MEP.The following table summarizes the information about NXP’s outstanding MEP Options and changes during 2014.Stock options Stock options Weighted averageexerciseprice in EUR Weighted averageremaining contractualterm Aggregate intrinsicvalue Outstanding at January 1, 2014 5,401,285 24.93 Granted — — Exercised (2,485,080) 26.02 Forfeited — — Expired — — Outstanding at December 31, 2014 2,916,205 24.00 3.7 113 Exercisable at December 31, 2014 2,916,205 24.00 3.7 113 The intrinsic value of exercised options was $74 million (2013: $71 million; 2012: $8 million), whereas the amount received by NXP was $86 million(2013: $142 million; 2012: $6 million).The number of vested options at December 31, 2014 was 2,916,205 (2013: 5,359,984 vested options) with a weighted average exercise price of €24.00(2013: €24.95 weighted average exercise price).At December 31, 2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. F-23Table of Contents10 Receivables, netAccounts receivable are summarized as follows: 2014 2013 Accounts receivable from third parties 549 504 Allowance for doubtful accounts (3) (3) Other receivables 47 41 593 542 The current portion of income taxes receivable of $2 million (2013: $7 million) is included under other receivables.11 Inventories, netInventories are summarized as follows: 2014 2013 Raw materials 50 59 Work in process 580 597 Finished goods 125 84 755 740 The portion of the finished goods stored at customer locations under consignment amounted to $19 million as of December 31, 2014 (2013: $22million).The amounts recorded above are net of an allowance for obsolescence of $64 million as of December 31, 2014 (2013: $63 million).12 Property, plant and equipment, netThe following table presents details of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation: Useful Life(in years) 2014 2013 Land 56 60 Buildings 9 to 50 686 679 Machinery and installations 2 to 10 2,549 2,492 Other Equipment 1 to 5 249 273 Prepayments and construction in progress 143 88 3,683 3,592 Less accumulated depreciation (2,560) (2,544) Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 1,123 1,048 Land with a book value of $56 million (2013: $60 million) is not depreciated.Property and equipment includes $15 million (2013: $62 million) related to assets acquired under capital leases. Accumulated depreciation related tothese assets was $12 million (2013: $55 million). See note 17 for information regarding capital lease obligations.There was no significant construction in progress and therefore no related capitalized interest.13 Identified Intangible AssetsIntangible assets, net of accumulated amortization and impairments of $573 million and $755 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectivelywere composed of the following: December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 Gross Accumulatedamortization andimpairments Gross Accumulatedamortization andimpairments Marketing-related 17 (16) 19 (18) Customer-related 400 (223) 437 (211) Technology-based 1,298 (968) 2,104 (1,619) 1,715 (1,207) 2,560 (1,848) Software(1) 151 (86) 137 (94) Identified intangible assets 1,866 (1,293) 2,697 (1,942) (1)Software includes $49 million (2013: $31 million) related to assets acquired under non-cancellable software licenses. The financial obligations fromthese contractor agreements are reflected in accrued and other non-current liabilities. Future payments are $19 million (2015), $16 million (2016) and$14 million (2017). F-24Table of ContentsThe estimated amortization expense for these identified intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is: 2015 123 2016 118 2017 107 2018 88 2019 26 All intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are subject to amortization and have no assumed residual value.The expected weighted average remaining life of identified intangibles is 5 years as of December 31, 2014.The estimated amortization expense for software as of December 31, 2014 for each of the five succeeding years is: 2015 28 2016 21 2017 16 2018 — 2019 — The expected weighted average remaining lifetime of software is 3 years as of December 31, 2014.14 GoodwillThe changes in goodwill in 2014 and 2013 were as follows: 2014 2013 Balances as of January 1 Cost 2,593 2,502 Accumulated impairment (235) (225) Book value 2,358 2,277 Changes in book value:Acquisitions — 1 Divestments — — Translation differences (237) 80 Total changes (237) 81 Balances as of December 31Cost 2,328 2,593 Accumulated impairment (207) (235) Book value 2,121 2,358 No goodwill impairment charges were required to be recognized in 2014 or 2013.The fair value of the reporting units substantially exceeds the carrying value of the reporting units.See note 23, “Segment and Geographical Information”, for goodwill by segment and note 3, “Acquisitions and Divestments”.15 Postretirement Benefit PlansPensionsOur employees participate in employee pension plans in accordance with the legal requirements, customs and the local situation in the respectivecountries. These are defined-benefit pension plans, defined-contribution plans and multi-employer plans.The Company’s employees in The Netherlands participate in a multi-employer plan, implemented for the employees of the Metal and ElectricalEngineering Industry (“Bedrijfstakpensioenfonds Metalektro or PME”) in accordance with the mandatory affiliation to PME effective for the industry inwhich NXP operates. As this affiliation is a legal requirement for the Metal and Electrical Engineering Industry it has no expiration date. This PME multi-employer plan (a career average plan) covers approximately 1,300 companies and 626,000 participants. The plan monitors its risk on an aggregate basis, notby company or participant and can therefore not be accounted for as a defined benefit plan. The pension fund rules state that the only obligation for affiliatedcompanies will be to pay the annual plan contributions. There is no obligation for affiliated companies to fund plan deficits. Affiliated companies are alsonot entitled to any possible surpluses in the pension fund.Every participating company contributes the same fixed percentage of its total pension base, being pensionable salary minus an individual offset. TheCompany’s pension cost for any period is the amount of contributions due for that period. F-25Table of ContentsThe contribution rate for the mandatory scheme will decrease from 27.1% (2014) to 26.6% (2015). PME multi-employer plan 2014 2013 2012 NXP’s contributions to the plan 48 51 53 (including employees’ contributions) 4 3 4 Average number of NXP’s active employees participating in the plan 2,881 3,133 3,229 NXP’s contribution to the plan exceeded more than 5 percent of the total contribution (as ofDecember 31 of the plan’s year end) No No No The amount for pension costs included in the statement of operations for the year 2014 was $77 million (2013: $86 million; 2012: $84 million) ofwhich $21 million (2013: $20 million; 2012: $19 million) represents defined-contribution plans and $41 million (2013: $45 million; 2012: $47 million)represents the PME multi-employer plans.Defined-benefit plansThe benefits provided by defined-benefit plans are based on employees’ years of service and compensation levels. Contributions are made by theCompany, as necessary, to provide assets sufficient to meet the benefits payable to defined-benefit pension plan participants.These contributions are determined based upon various factors, including funded status, legal and tax considerations as well as local customs. TheCompany funds certain defined-benefit pension plans as claims are incurred.The total cost of defined-benefit plans amounted to $15 million in 2014 (2013: $21 million; 2012: $18 million) consisting of $15 million ongoingcost (2013: $21 million; 2012: $20 million) and nil from special events resulting from restructurings, curtailments and settlements (2013: nil; 2012: $2million).The table below provides a summary of the changes in the pension benefit obligations and defined-benefit pension plan assets for 2014 and 2013,associated with the Company’s dedicated plans, and a reconciliation of the funded status of these plans to the amounts recognized in the consolidatedbalance sheets. 2014 2013 Projected benefit obligation Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year 406 419 Additions — — Service cost 10 12 Interest cost 13 15 Actuarial (gains) and losses 76 (23) Curtailments and settlements — — Benefits paid (15) (24) Exchange rate differences (43) 7 Projected benefit obligation at end of year 447 406 Plan assetsFair value of plan assets at beginning of year 170 162 Actual return on plan assets 10 5 Employer contributions 11 21 Benefits paid (15) (24) Exchange rate differences (19) 6 Fair value of plan assets at end of year 157 170 Funded status (290) (236) Classification of the funded status is as follows- Prepaid pension cost within other non-current assets — 18 - Accrued pension cost within other non-current liabilities (282) (245) - Accrued pension cost within accrued liabilities (8) (9) Total (290) (236) Accumulated benefit obligationAccumulated benefit obligation for all Company-dedicated benefit pension plans 416 370 Plans with assets less than accumulated benefit obligationFunded plans with assets less than accumulated benefit obligation- Fair value of plan assets 153 17 - Accumulated benefit obligations 204 56 - Projected benefit obligations 224 84 Unfunded plans- Accumulated benefit obligations 209 179 - Projected benefit obligations 218 187 Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (before tax)Total AOCI at beginning of year 2 22 - Net actuarial loss (gain) 74 (21) - Exchange rate differences (6) 1 Total AOCI at end of year 70 2 F-26Table of ContentsThe weighted average assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligations were as follows: 2014 2013 Discount rate 2.6% 3.7% Rate of compensation increase 1.8% 2.3% The weighted average assumptions used to calculate the net periodic pension cost were as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Discount rate 3.7% 3.5% 4.4% Expected returns on plan assets 4.2% 4.0% 4.1% Rate of compensation increase 2.3% 2.4% 3.1% For the Company’s major plans, the discount rate used is based on high quality corporate bonds (iBoxx Corporate Euro AA 10+).Plans in countries without a deep corporate bond market use a discount rate based on the local sovereign rate and the plans maturity (BloombergGovernment Bond Yields).Expected returns per asset class are based on the assumption that asset valuations tend to return to their respective long-term equilibria. The ExpectedReturn on Assets for any funded plan equals the average of the expected returns per asset class weighted by their portfolio weights in accordance with thefund’s strategic asset allocation.The components of net periodic pension costs were as follows: 2014 2013 2012 Service cost 10 12 11 Interest cost on the projected benefit obligation 13 15 14 Expected return on plan assets (7) (7) (6) Amortization of net (gain) loss (1) 1 — Curtailments & settlements — — (2) Other — — 1 Net periodic cost 15 21 18 A sensitivity analysis shows that if the discount rate increases by 1% from the level of December 31, 2014, with all other variables held constant, thenet periodic pension cost would increase by $2 million. If the discount rate decreases by 1% from the level of December 31, 2014, with all other variablesheld constant, the net periodic pension cost would decrease by $2 million.The estimated net actuarial loss (gain) and prior service cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodicbenefit cost over the next year (2015) are $3 million and nil respectively.Plan assetsThe actual pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows: 2014 2013 Asset category: Equity securities 35% 32% Debt securities 54% 53% Other 11% 15% 100% 100% We met our target plan asset allocation. The investment objectives for the pension plan assets are designed to generate returns that, along with thefuture contributions, will enable the pension plans to meet their future obligations. The investments in our major defined benefit plans largely consist ofgovernment bonds, “Level 2” Corporate Bonds and cash to mitigate the risk of interest fluctuations. The asset mix of equity, bonds, cash and other categoriesis evaluated by an asset-liability modeling study for our largest plan. The assets of funded plans in other countries mostly have a large proportion of fixedincome securities with return characteristics that are aligned with changes in the liabilities caused by discount rate volatility. Total pension plan assets of$157 million include $145 million related to the German, Swiss and Philippine pension funds.The following table summarizes the classification of these assets. 2014 2013 Level I Level II Level III Level I Level II Level III Equity securities 1 47 — 1 51 — Debt securities 15 61 — 15 66 — Other 12 6 3 13 7 4 28 114 3 29 124 4 F-27Table of ContentsThe Company currently expects to make cash contributions of $65 million in 2015, consisting of $4 million of employer contributions to defined-benefit pension plans, $18 million of employer contributions to defined-contribution pension plans, $37 million of employer contributions to multi-employer plans and $6 million of expected cash payments in relation to unfunded pension plans.Estimated future pension benefit paymentsThe following benefit payments are expected to be made (including those for funded plans): 2015 14 2016 13 2017 13 2018 16 2019 17 Years 2020-2024 107 16 DebtShort-term debt 2014 2013 Short-term bank borrowings 8 24 Current portion of long-term debt 12 16 Total 20 40 At December 31, 2014, short-term bank borrowings of $8 million (2013: $24 million) consisted of a local bank borrowing by our Chinese subsidiary.The applicable weighted average interest rate during 2014 was 2.3% (2013: 3.5%).Long-term debt Range ofinterest rates Averagerate ofinterest Amountoutstanding 2014 Due in2015 Due after2015 Due after2019 Averageremainingterm(in years) AmountoutstandingDecember 31,2013 USD notes 2.8%-5.8% 4.2% 3,039 8 3,031 1,375 4.4 3,133 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes 1.0%-1.0% 1.0% 945 — 945 — 4.9 — Revolving Credit Facility (1) — — — — — — — 150 Bank borrowings 2.0%-2.0% 2.0% 3 3 — — 0.3 4 Liabilities arising from capital lease transactions 2.6%-13.8% 5.9% 4 1 3 — 1.8 10 3.3% 3,991 12 3,979 1,375 4.6 3,297 (1) We do not have any borrowings under the €620 million Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2014.The following amounts of long-term debt at book value as of December 31, 2014 are due in the next 5 years: 2015 12 2016 510 2017 392 2018 754 2019 948 Due after 5 years 1,375 3,991 As of December 31, 2014, the fixed rate notes and floating rate notes represented 81% and 19% respectively of the total principal amount of the notesoutstanding at December 31, 2014. The remaining tenor of secured debt is on average 3.6 years.Accrued interest as of December 31, 2014 is $28 million (December 31, 2013: $27 million).Debt exchange and repurchaseAt December 31, 2014 long-term debt increased to $3,979 million from $3,281 million at December 31, 2013. In 2014, the book value of our long-termdebt increased by $698 million to $3,979 million, mainly due to the issuance of the Cash Convertible Notes due 2019 offset by repayments of the RevolvingCredit Facility. Extinguishment of debt in 2014 amounted to a loss of $3 million compared to a loss of $114 million in 2013. F-28Table of Contents2014 Financing Activities2017 Term LoanOn February 18, 2014, NXP entered into a new $400 million aggregate principal amount Senior Secured Term Loan Facility due March 4, 2017.Concurrently, NXP called the $486 million principal amount Senior Secured Term Loan Facility due March 4, 2017. A $100 million draw-down under ourexisting Revolving Credit Facility and approximately $5 million of cash on hand were used to settle the combined transactions, as well as pay the related callpremium of $5 million and accrued interest of $4 million.2019 Cash Convertible Senior NotesIn November 2014, NXP issued $1,150 million principal amount of its 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes (the “Notes”). The 2019 Cash ConvertibleSenior Notes have a stated interest rate of 1.00%, matures on December 1, 2019 and may be settled only in cash. The indenture for the 2019 Cash ConvertibleSenior Notes does not contain any financial covenants. Contractual interest payable on the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes began accruing in December2014 and is payable semi-annually each December 1st and June 1st. The initial purchasers’ transaction fees and expenses totaling $16 million werecapitalized as deferred financing costs and are amortized over the term of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes using the effective interest method.Prior to September 1, 2019, holders may convert their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes into cash upon the occurrence of one of the followingevents: • the price of NXP’s common stock reaches $102.84 during certain periods of time specified in the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes; • specified corporate transactions occur; or • the trading price of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes falls below 98% of the product of (i) the last reported sales price of NXP’s commonstock and (ii) the conversion rate on the date.On or after September 1, 2019, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders mayconvert their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes into cash at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. NXP may not redeem the 2019 CashConvertible Senior Notes prior to maturity.The initial cash conversion rate for the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes is 9.7236 shares of NXP’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, equivalent to a cash conversion price of approximately $102.84 per share of NXP’s common stock, with the amount dueon conversion payable in cash. Upon cash conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis foreach day, during a specified observation period following the cash conversion date.If a “fundamental change” (as defined below in this section) occurs at any time, holders will have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchasefor cash all of their 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, or any portion of the principal thereof that is equal to $1,000 or a multiple of $1,000 (provided thatthe portion of any global note or certified note, as applicable, not tendered for repurchase has a principal amount of at least $200,000, on the fundamentalchange repurchase date. A fundamental change is any transaction or event (whether by means of an exchange offer, change of common stock, liquidation,consolidation, merger, reclassification, recapitalization or otherwise) in which more than 50% of NXP’s common stock is exchanged for, converted into,acquired for or constitutes solely the right to receive, consideration. A transaction or transactions described above will not constitute a fundamental change,however, if at least 90% of the consideration received or to be received by our common shareholders, excluding cash payments for fractional shares, inconnection with such transaction or transactions consists of shares of common equity that are listed or quoted on any permitted exchange or will be so listedor quoted when issued or exchanged in connection with such transaction or transactions and as a result of such transaction or transactions such considerationbecomes the reference property for the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes.As of December 31, 2014, none of the conditions allowing the holders of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes to convert the 2019 CashConvertible Senior Notes into cash had been met.The cash conversion feature of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, or the Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative, requires bifurcation from the2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes. The Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative is accounted for as a derivative liability, which is included in Other non-current liabilities in NXP’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative at the time of issuance of the 2019Cash Convertible Senior Notes was $208 million, and was recorded as the original debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of theNotes. This discount is recognized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes. As ofDecember 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of the Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative was $203 million.Concurrently with the pricing of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes, NXP entered into hedge transactions, or the Notes Hedges, with variousparties whereby NXP has the option to receive the cash amount that may be due to the Notes holders at maturity in excess of the $1,150 million principalamount of the notes, subject to certain conversion rate adjustments in the Notes Indenture. These options expire on December 1, 2019, and must be settled incash. The aggregate cost of the Notes Hedges was $208 million. The Notes Hedges are accounted for as derivative assets, and are included in Other assets inNXP’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of the Notes Hedges was $203 million.The Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative and the Notes Hedges are adjusted to fair value each reported period and unrealized gains and losses arereflected in NXP’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Because the fair values of the Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative and the Notes Hedges aredesigned to have similar offsetting values, there was no impact to NXP’s Consolidated Statements of Operations relating to these adjustments to fair valueduring fiscal 2014. F-29Table of ContentsIn separate transactions, NXP also sold warrants, to various parties for the purchase of up to approximately 11.18 million shares of NXP’s commonstock at a price of $133.32 per share in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. TheWarrants expire on various dates from March 2, 2012, through April 30, 2020, and will be net share settled. NXP received $134 million in cash proceeds fromthe sale of the Warrants, which has been recorded in Other non-current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the Warrants will be recognized in NXP’sConsolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2014 the estimated fair value of the Warrants was $136 million. The Warrants are included in dilutedearnings per share to the extent the impact is dilutive. As of December 31, 2014, the Warrants were not dilutive.The principal amount, unamortized debt discount and net carrying amount of the liability component of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes as ofDecember 31, 2014 was as follows: (in millions) As ofDecember 31, 2014 Principal amount of Cash Convertible Senior Notes 1,150 Unamortized debt discount of Cash Convertible Senior Notes 205 Net liability of Cash Convertible Senior Notes 945 The effective interest rate, contractual interest expense and amortization of debt discount for the Convertible Notes for fiscal 2014 were as follows: (in millions, except percentage) 2014 Effective interest rate 5.14% Contractual interest expense $1 Amortization of debt discount $3 As of December 31, 2014, the if-converted value of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes exceeded the principal amount of the Notes. The total fairvalue of the 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes was $1,176 million.U.S. dollar-denominated notesThe following table summarizes the outstanding notes as of December 31, 2014: Principalamount Fixed/floating Interestrate Current couponrate Maturitydate Term Loan 396 Floating LIBOR plus 2% with a floor of 0.75% 2.75% 2017 Term Loan 395 Floating LIBOR plus 2.50% with a floor of 0.75% 3.25% 2020 Senior Unsecured Notes 500 Fixed 3.5% 3.5% 2016 Senior Unsecured Notes 750 Fixed 3.75% 3.75% 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes 500 Fixed 5.75% 5.75% 2021 Senior Unsecured Notes 500 Fixed 5.75% 5.75% 2023 Cash Convertible Notes 1,150 Fixed 1% 1% 2019 Revolving Credit Facility Floating 2017 Certain terms and Covenants of the U.S. dollar-denominated notesThe Company is not required to make mandatory redemption payments or sinking fund payments with respect to the notes. With respect to the TermLoans, the Company is required to repay $8 million annually.The indentures governing the notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and that of restricted subsidiaries to incuradditional indebtedness, create liens, pay dividends, redeem capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments; enter into agreementsthat restrict dividends from restricted subsidiaries; sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; engage in transactions with affiliates; andeffect a consolidation or merger.Certain portions of long-term and short-term debt as of December 31, 2014 in the principal amount of $791 million (2013: $1,033 million) have beensecured by collateral on substantially all of the Company’s assets and of certain of its subsidiaries.Each series of the senior unsecured notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally, on a senior basis by certain of the Company’scurrent and future material wholly owned subsidiaries (“Guarantors”). F-30Table of ContentsPursuant to various security documents related to the above mentioned term loans and the $754 million (denominated €620 million) committedrevolving credit facility, the Company and each Guarantor has granted first priority liens and security interests in, amongst others, the following, subject tothe grant of further permitted collateral liens: (a)all present and future shares of capital stock of (or other ownership or profit interests in) each of its present and future direct subsidiaries, otherthan SMST Unterstützungskasse GmbH, and material joint venture entities; (b)all present and future intercompany debt of the Company and each Guarantor; (c)all of the present and future property and assets, real and personal, of the Company, and each Guarantor, including, but not limited to, machineryand equipment, inventory and other goods, accounts receivable, owned real estate, leaseholds, fixtures, general intangibles, license rights,patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, chattel paper, insurance proceeds, contract rights, hedge agreements, documents, instruments,indemnification rights, tax refunds, but excluding cash and bank accounts; and (d)all proceeds and products of the property and assets described above.Notwithstanding the foregoing, certain assets may not be pledged (or the liens not perfected) in accordance with agreed security principles, including: • if the cost of providing security is not proportionate to the benefit accruing to the holders; and • if providing such security requires consent of a third party and such consent cannot be obtained after the use of commercially reasonable efforts;and • if providing such security would be prohibited by applicable law, general statutory limitations, financial assistance, corporate benefit, fraudulentpreference, “thin capitalization” rules or similar matters or providing security would be outside the applicable pledgor’s capacity or conflict withfiduciary duties of directors or cause material risk of personal or criminal liability after using commercially reasonable efforts to overcome suchobstacles; and • if providing such security would have a material adverse effect (as reasonably determined in good faith by such subsidiary) on the ability of suchsubsidiary to conduct its operations and business in the ordinary course as otherwise permitted by the indenture; and • if providing such security or perfecting liens thereon would require giving notice (i) in the case of receivables security, to customers or (ii) in thecase of bank accounts, to the banks with whom the accounts are maintained. Such notice will only be provided after the secured notes areaccelerated.Subject to agreed security principles, if material property is acquired by the Company or a Guarantor that is not automatically subject to a perfectedsecurity interest under the security documents, then the Company or relevant Guarantor will within 60 days provide security over this property and delivercertain certificates and opinions in respect thereof as specified in the indenture governing the notes.17 Commitments and ContingenciesLease CommitmentsProperty, plant and equipment includes $3 million as of December 31, 2014 (2013: $7 million) for capital leases and other beneficial rights of use, suchas building rights and hire purchase agreements. The financial obligations arising from these contractual agreements are reflected in long-term debt. Long-term operating lease commitments totaled $130 million as of December 31, 2014 (2013: $107 million). The long-term operating leases are mainly related tothe rental of buildings. These leases expire at various dates during the next 30 years. Future minimum lease payments under operating and capital leases areas follows: Operating Leases Capital Leases 2015 42 1 2016 27 2 2017 14 1 2018 12 — 2019 13 — Thereafter 22 — Total future minimum leases payments 130 4 Less: amount representing interest — Present value of future minimum lease payments 4 Rent expense amounted to $63 million in 2014 (2013: $65 million; 2012: $54 million).Purchase CommitmentsThe Company maintains purchase commitments with certain suppliers, primarily for raw materials, semi finished goods and manufacturing services andfor some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed uponbetween the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary for different suppliers. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had purchase commitments of $336million, which are due through 2019. F-31Table of ContentsEnvironmental remediationIn each jurisdiction in which we operate, we are subject to many environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that govern, among otherthings, emissions of pollutants into the air, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of hazardous substances, waste disposal, the investigation andremediation of soil and ground water contamination and the health and safety of our employees. We are also required to obtain environmental permits fromgovernmental authorities for certain of our operations.As with other companies engaged in similar activities or that own or operate real property, the Company faces inherent risks of environmental liabilityat our current and historical manufacturing facilities. Certain environmental laws impose liability on current or previous owners or operators of real propertyfor the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances. Certain of these laws also assess liability on persons who arrange for hazardous substances tobe sent to disposal or treatment facilities when such facilities are found to be contaminated.Soil and groundwater contamination has been identified at our properties in Hamburg, Germany and Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The remediationprocesses have been ongoing for several years and are expected to continue for several years.Our former property in Lent, the Netherlands, is affected by trichloroethylene contamination. ProRail B.V., owns certain property located nearby andhas claimed that we have caused trichloroethylene contamination on their property. We have rejected ProRail’s claims, as we believe that the contaminationwas caused by a prior owner of our property in Lent. While we are currently not taking any remediation or other actions, we estimate that our aggregatepotential liability, if any, in respect of this property will not be material.Asbestos contamination has been found in certain parts of our properties in Manchester in the United Kingdom and in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Bothin the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, we will be required to dispose of the asbestos when the buildings currently standing on the property aredemolished or divested. We estimate our potential liability will not be material. Additionally, in the Netherlands, we will be required to remediate theasbestos contamination at a leased property, upon termination of the lease. The lease is not expected to end soon and we estimate the cost of remediation willnot be material.LitigationWe are regularly involved as plaintiffs or defendants in claims and litigation relating to matters such as commercial transactions and intellectualproperty rights. In addition, our divestments sometimes result in, or are followed by, claims or litigation by either party. From time to time, we also are subjectto alleged patent infringement claims. We rigorously defend ourselves against these alleged patent infringement claims, and we rarely participate insettlement discussions. Although the ultimate disposition of asserted claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is our belief that theoutcome of any such claims, either individually or on a combined basis, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.However, such outcomes may be material to our consolidated statement of operations for a particular period.With the support from its in-house and outside counsel and based on its best estimate, the Company records an accrual for any claim that ariseswhenever it considers that it is probable that it is exposed to a loss contingency and the amount of the loss contingency can be reasonably estimated. Basedon the most current information available to it and based on its best estimate, the Company also reevaluates at least on a quarterly basis the claims that havearisen to determine whether any new accruals need to be made or whether any accruals made need to be adjusted.Based on the procedures described above, the Company has an aggregate amount of approximately $2 million accrued for legal proceedings pendingas of December 31, 2014, compared to approximately $7 million as of December 31, 2013. Such accruals are for the greater part included in “Accruedliabilities”. There can be no assurance that the Company’s accruals will be sufficient to cover the extent of its potential exposure to losses. Historically, legalactions have not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.The estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses is based on currently available information in relation to the claims that have arisen andon the Company’s best estimate of such losses for those cases for which such estimate can be made. For certain claims, the Company believes that an estimatecannot currently be made. The estimated aggregate range requires significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact thatmany of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants (including the Company) in such claims whose share of liability hasyet to be determined, the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the claims, and the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of suchclaims. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate. As at December 31,2014, the Company believes that for all litigation pending its aggregate exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued could range between $0 andapproximately $44 million.18 Stockholders’ EquityThe share capital of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 consists of 1,076,257,500 authorized shares, including 430,503,000 authorizedshares of common stock, and 645,754,500 authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock.At December 31, 2014, the Company has issued and paid up 251,751,500 shares (2013: 251,751,500 shares) of common stock each having a par valueof €0.20 or a nominal stock capital of €50 million.Share-based awardsThe Company has granted share-based awards to the members of our board of directors, management team, our other executives, selected other keyemployees/talents of NXP and selected new hires to receive the Company’s shares in the future. See note 9, “Share-based Compensation”. F-32Table of ContentsTreasury sharesIn connection with the Company’s share repurchase programs, which originally commenced in 2011, and which were extended effective August 1,2013 and February 6, 2014, and in accordance with the Company’s policy to provide share-based awards from its treasury share inventory, shares which havebeen repurchased and are held in treasury for delivery upon exercise of options and under restricted and performance share programs, are accounted for as areduction of stockholders’ equity. Treasury shares are recorded at cost, representing the market price on the acquisition date. When issued, shares are removedfrom treasury shares on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.Differences between the cost and the proceeds received when treasury shares are reissued, are recorded in capital in excess of par value. Deficiencies inexcess of net gains arising from previous treasury share issuances are charged to retained earnings.The following transactions took place resulting from employee option and share plans in 2014: 2014 Total shares in treasury at beginning of year 4,170,833 Total cost 167 Shares acquired under repurchase program 23,246,177 Average price in $ per share 61.73 Amount paid 1,435 Shares delivered 8,245,556 Average price in $ per share 46.84 Amount received 145 Total shares in treasury at end of year 19,171,454 Total cost 1,219 19 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxTotal comprehensive income (loss) represents net income (loss) plus the results of certain equity changes not reflected in the Consolidated Statementsof Operations. The after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and their corresponding changes are shown below: Netinvestmenthedge Currencytranslationdifferences Changes infair value cashflow hedges Netactuarialgain/(losses) Unrealizedgain/(losses)available-for-salesecurities AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (loss) As of December 31, 2011 (203) 504 — 22 — 323 2012 other comprehensive income (loss) 18 10 — (51) — (23) As of December 31, 2012 (185) 514 — (29) — 300 2013 other comprehensive income (loss) 68 (27) (4) 10 — 47 As of December 31, 2013 (117) 487 (4) (19) — 347 2014 other comprehensive income (loss) (214) 140 2 (66) 1 (137) As of December 31, 2014 (331) 627 (2) (85) 1 210 20 Related-party TransactionsThe Company’s related parties are the members of the board of directors of NXP Semiconductors N.V., the members of the management team of NXPSemiconductors N.V. and equity-accounted investees.OtherWe have a number of strategic alliances and joint ventures. We have relationships with certain of our alliance partners in the ordinary course ofbusiness whereby we enter into various sale and purchase transactions, generally on terms comparable to transactions with third parties. However, in certaininstances upon divestment of former businesses where we enter into supply arrangements with the former owned business, sales are conducted at cost.The following table presents the amounts related to revenue and expenses incurred in transactions with these related parties: 2014 2013 2012 Revenue 11 — 33 Purchase of goods and services 103 102 204 The following table presents the amounts related to balances with these related parties: 2014 2013 Receivables 15 — Payables 30 33 F-33Table of Contents21 Fair Value of Financial Assets and LiabilitiesThe following table summarizes the estimated fair value and carrying amount of our financial instruments: December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 Fair valuehierarchy(1) Carryingamount Estimatedfair value Carryingamount Estimatedfair value Assets: Notes hedges 2 203 203 — — Other financial assets 2 44 44 18 18 Derivative instruments-assets 2 2 2 1 1 Liabilities: Short-term debt 2 (12) (12) (31) (31) Short-term debt (bonds) 2(1) (8) (8) (9) (9) Long-term debt (bonds) 2(1) (3,031) (3,079) (3,124) (3,181) 2019 Cash Convertible Senior Notes 2 (945) (1,176) — — Other long-term debt 2 (3) (3) (157) (157) Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative 2 (203) (203) — — Warrants 2 (136) (136) — — Derivative instruments-liabilities 2 (4) (4) (6) (6) (1) Transfers between the levels of fair value hierarchy are recognized when a change in circumstances would require it. Short-term and long-term debt(bonds) was transferred to level 2 from level 1 as the Company concluded the inputs had become less observable.The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:Other financial assets and derivativesFor other financial assets and derivatives the fair value is based upon significant other observable inputs depending on the nature of the other financialasset and derivative.Notes hedgesThe Notes hedges are measured at fair value using level 2 inputs. The instrument is not actively traded and is valued using an option pricing modelthat uses observable market data for all inputs, such as implied volatility of NXP’s common stock, risk-free interest rate and other factors.DebtThe fair value is estimated on the basis of observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities for certain issues, or onthe basis of discounted cash flow analyses. Accrued interest is included under accounts payable and not within the carrying amount or estimated fair value ofdebt.Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative and WarrantsThe Notes Embedded Conversion Derivative and Warrants are measured at fair value using level 2 inputs. These instruments are not actively tradedand are valued using an option pricing model that uses observable market data for all inputs, such as implied volatility of NXP’s common stock, risk-freeinterest rate and other factors.Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basisWe measure and record our non-marketable equity investments (non-marketable equity method and cost method investments) and non-financial assets,such as intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, at fair value when an impairment charge is required.22 Other Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Currency RiskWe conduct business in diverse markets around the world and employ a variety of risk management strategies and techniques to manage foreigncurrency exchange rate and interest rate risks. Our risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize thepotentially adverse effects that the volatility of these markets may have on our operating results. One way we achieve this is through the active hedging ofrisks through the selective use of derivative instruments.Derivatives are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value which fluctuates based on changing market conditions.The Company does not purchase or hold financial derivative instruments for trading purposes. F-34Table of ContentsCurrency riskThe Company’s transactions are denominated in a variety of currencies. The Company uses financial instruments to reduce its exposure to the effects ofcurrency fluctuations. Accordingly, the Company’s organizations identify and measure their exposures from transactions denominated in other than theirown functional currency. We calculate our net exposure on a cash flow basis considering balance sheet items, actual orders received or made and anticipatedrevenue and expenses. The Company generally hedges foreign currency exposures in relation to transaction exposures, such as receivables/payables resultingfrom such transactions and part of anticipated sales and purchases. The Company generally uses forwards to hedge these exposures. In addition, the U.S.dollar-denominated debt held by our Dutch subsidiary which has a euro functional currency may generate adverse currency results in financial income andexpenses depending on the exchange rate movement between the euro and the U.S. dollar. This exposure has been partially mitigated by the application ofnet investment hedge accounting. In accordance with the provisions in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, the Company has applied net investmenthedging since May 2011. The U.S. dollar exposure of our net investment in U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries has been hedged by our U.S. dollardenominated debt for an amount of $1.7 billion. The hedging relationship is assumed to be highly effective. Foreign currency gains or losses on this U.S.dollar debt that is recorded in a euro functional currency entity that are designated as, and to the extent they are effective as, a hedge of the net investment inour U.S. dollar foreign entities, are reported as a translation adjustment in other comprehensive income within equity, and offset in whole or in part theforeign currency changes to the net investment that are also reported in other comprehensive income. As a result, in 2014, a charge of $214 million (2013: abenefit of $68 million) was recorded in other comprehensive income relating to the foreign currency result on the U.S. dollar-denominated notes that arerecorded in a euro functional currency entity. Absent the application of net investment hedging, this amount would have been recorded as a loss (2013: gain)within financial income (expense) in the statement of operations. No amount resulting from ineffectiveness of net investment hedge accounting wasrecognized in the statement of operations in 2014 (2013: no amount).23 Segments and Geographical InformationNXP is organized into two reportable segments, High Performance Mixed Signal (“HPMS”) and Standard Products (“SP”). Corporate and Otherrepresents the remaining portion to reconcile to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Our HPMS business segment delivers high performance mixed signal solutions to our customers to satisfy their system and sub-systems needs acrosseight application areas: automotive, identification, mobile, consumer, computing, wireless infrastructure, lighting and industrial, and software solutions formobile phones. Our SP business segment offers standard products for use across many application markets, as well as application-specific standard productspredominantly used in application areas such as mobile handsets, computing, consumer and automotive. The segments each include revenue from the saleand licensing of intellectual property related to that segment.Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our CODM, regularly reviews financial information at the reporting segment level in order to make decisions aboutresources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance. Segment results that are reported to the CODM include items directly attributable toa segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis. Asset information by segment is not provided to our CODM as the majority of ourassets are used jointly or managed at corporate level. Arithmetical allocation of these assets to the various businesses is not deemed to be meaningful and assuch total assets per segment has been omitted.Detailed information by segment for the years 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented in the following tables. Revenue 2014 2013 2012 HPMS 4,208 3,533 2,976 SP 1,275 1,145 1,168 Corporate and Other (1) 164 137 214 5,647 4,815 4,358 Operating income (loss) 2014 2013 2012 HPMS 983 712 479 SP 120 39 89 Corporate and Other (1) (54) (100) (156) 1,049 651 412 (1) Corporate and Other is not a segment under ASC 280 “Segment Reporting”. Corporate and Other includes unallocated expenses not related to anyspecific business segment and corporate restructuring charges. F-35Table of ContentsGoodwill assigned to segments Cost at January 1,2014 Acquisitions Translationdifferences and otherchanges Cost atDecember 31,2014 HPMS 1,788 — (183) 1,605 SP 472 — (48) 424 Corporate and Other (1) 333 — (34) 299 2,593 — (265) 2,328 Accumulatedimpairment atJanuary 1, 2014 Translation differencesand other changes Accumulatedimpairment atDecember 31, 2014 HPMS (195) 23 (172) SP (40) 5 (35) Corporate and Other (1) — — — (235) 28 (207) (1) Corporate and Other is not a segment under ASC 280 “Segment Reporting”.Geographical Information Revenue (1) Property, plant and equipment 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 China 2,756 2,047 1,699 116 115 131 Netherlands 171 146 94 169 180 180 Taiwan 96 98 112 138 91 80 United States 396 365 303 5 6 8 Singapore 452 421 436 200 214 226 Germany 450 434 447 80 80 88 South Korea 287 294 238 1 1 — Other countries 1,039 1,010 1,029 414 361 357 5,647 4,815 4,358 1,123 1,048 1,070 (1) Revenue attributed to geographic areas is based on the customer’s shipped-to location (except for intellectual property license revenue which isattributable to the Netherlands).24 Subsequent EventsOn March 2, 2015, NXP announced that the company has entered into a definitive agreement under which NXP will merge with FreescaleSemiconductor, Ltd. (Freescale).Under the terms of the agreement, Freescale shareholders will receive $6.25 in cash and 0.3521 of an NXP ordinary share for each Freescale commonshare held at the close of the transaction. The purchase price implies a total equity value for Freescale of approximately $11.8 billion (based on NXP’sclosing stock price as of February 27, 2015) and a total enterprise value of approximately $16.7 billion including Freescale’s net debt. The transaction isexpected to close in the second half of calendar 2015. NXP intends to fund the transaction with $1.0 billion of cash from its balance sheet, $1.0 billion of newdebt and approximately 115 million of NXP ordinary shares. Post transaction, Freescale shareholders are expected to own approximately 32 percent of thecombined company. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies and is subject to regulatory approvals invarious jurisdictions and customary closing conditions, as well as the approval of NXP and Freescale shareholders. Upon consummation, we expect toaccount for the merger under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Topic805, Business Combinations, with NXP treated as the accounting acquirer.Following our initial announcement on November 24, 2014, we purchased certain assets and IP of Quintic related to its Wearable and BluetoothEnergy IC business during the first quarter of 2015. This transaction contributes to NXP’s drive to create security and connectivity solutions for fast-growingInternet-of-Things applications in Health & Fitness Wearables, Mobile Transactions, Proximity Marketing, Smart Home and Automotive. The acquisition wasaccounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The financial impact of this acquisition was not material to the Company. F-36Exhibit 4.7EXECUTION VERSION NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V.ANDDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,as TrusteeINDENTUREDated as of December 1, 20141.00% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS Section 1.01.Definitions 1 Section 1.02.References to Interest 12 ARTICLE 2 ISSUE, DESCRIPTION, EXECUTION, REGISTRATION AND EXCHANGE OF NOTES Section 2.01.Designation and Amount 12 Section 2.02.Form of Notes 12 Section 2.03.Date and Denomination of Notes; Payments of Interest and Defaulted Amounts 13 Section 2.04.Execution, Authentication and Delivery of Notes 14 Section 2.05.Exchange and Registration of Transfer of Notes; Restrictions on Transfer; Depositary 15 Section 2.06.Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Notes 22 Section 2.07.Temporary Notes 23 Section 2.08.Cancellation of Notes Paid, Converted, Etc 24 Section 2.09.CUSIP Numbers 24 Section 2.10.Additional Notes; Repurchases 24 ARTICLE 3 SATISFACTION AND DISCHARGE Section 3.01.Satisfaction and Discharge 25 ARTICLE 4 PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY Section 4.01.Payment of Principal and Interest 25 Section 4.02.Maintenance of Office or Agency 25 Section 4.03.Appointments to Fill Vacancies in Trustee’s Office 26 Section 4.04.Provisions as to Paying Agent 26 Section 4.05.[Reserved] 28 Section 4.06.Rule 144A Information Requirement and Annual Reports 28 Section 4.07.Stay, Extension and Usury Laws 29 Section 4.08.Compliance Certificate; Statements as to Defaults 29 Section 4.09.Further Instruments and Acts 30 Section 4.10.Additional Amounts. 30 iARTICLE 5 LISTS OF HOLDERS AND REPORTS BY THE COMPANY AND THE TRUSTEE Section 5.01.Lists of Holders 32 Section 5.02.Preservation and Disclosure of Lists 33 ARTICLE 6 DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Section 6.01.Events of Default 33 Section 6.02.Acceleration; Rescission and Annulment 34 Section 6.03.Additional Interest 35 Section 6.04.Payments of Notes on Default; Suit Therefor 36 Section 6.05.Application of Monies Collected by Trustee 37 Section 6.06.Proceedings by Holders 38 Section 6.07.Proceedings by Trustee 39 Section 6.08.Remedies Cumulative and Continuing 39 Section 6.09.Direction of Proceedings and Waiver of Defaults by Majority of Holders 40 Section 6.10.Notice of Defaults 40 Section 6.11.Undertaking to Pay Costs 40 ARTICLE 7 CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE Section 7.01.Duties and Responsibilities of Trustee 41 Section 7.02.Reliance on Documents, Opinions, Etc 42 Section 7.03.No Responsibility for Recitals, Etc 43 Section 7.04.Trustee, Paying Agents, Conversion Agents, Bid Solicitation Agent or Note Registrar May Own Notes 44 Section 7.05.Monies to Be Held in Trust 44 Section 7.06.Compensation and Expenses of Trustee 44 Section 7.07.Officer’s Certificate as Evidence 45 Section 7.08.Eligibility of Trustee 45 Section 7.09.Resignation or Removal of Trustee 45 Section 7.10.Acceptance by Successor Trustee 46 Section 7.11.Succession by Merger, Etc 47 Section 7.12.Trustee’s Application for Instructions from the Company 47 ARTICLE 8 CONCERNING THE HOLDERS Section 8.01.Action by Holders 48 Section 8.02.Proof of Execution by Holders 48 Section 8.03.Who Are Deemed Absolute Owners 48 Section 8.04.Company-Owned Notes Disregarded 49 Section 8.05.Revocation of Consents; Future Holders Bound 49 iiARTICLE 9 HOLDERS’ MEETINGS Section 9.01.Purpose of Meetings 49 Section 9.02.Call of Meetings by Trustee 50 Section 9.03.Call of Meetings by Company or Holders 50 Section 9.04.Qualifications for Voting 50 Section 9.05.Regulations 50 Section 9.06.Voting 51 Section 9.07.No Delay of Rights by Meeting 51 ARTICLE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURES Section 10.01.Supplemental Indentures Without Consent of Holders 52 Section 10.02.Supplemental Indentures with Consent of Holders 52 Section 10.03.Effect of Supplemental Indentures 54 Section 10.04.Notation on Notes 54 Section 10.05.Evidence of Compliance of Supplemental Indenture to Be Furnished Trustee 54 ARTICLE 11 CONSOLIDATION, MERGER, SALE, CONVEYANCE AND LEASE Section 11.01.Company May Consolidate, Etc. on Certain Terms 54 Section 11.02.Successor Corporation to Be Substituted 55 Section 11.03.Opinion of Counsel to Be Given to Trustee 55 ARTICLE 12 IMMUNITY OF INCORPORATORS, STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Section 12.01.Indenture and Notes Solely Corporate Obligations 56 ARTICLE 13 [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED] ARTICLE 14 CONVERSION OF NOTES Section 14.01.Conversion Privilege 56 Section 14.02.Conversion Procedure; Payment Upon Conversion. 59 Section 14.03.Increased Conversion Rate Applicable to Certain Notes Surrendered for Conversion in Connection with Make-Whole FundamentalChanges or Tax Redemptions 61 Section 14.04.Adjustment of Conversion Rate 63 Section 14.05.Adjustments of Prices 72 Section 14.06.[Reserved] 72 iiiSection 14.07.Effect of Recapitalizations, Reclassifications and Changes of the Common Stock 72 Section 14.08.[Reserved] 74 Section 14.09.Responsibility of Trustee 74 Section 14.10.Notice to Holders Prior to Certain Actions 74 Section 14.11.Stockholder Rights Plans 75 Section 14.12.Exchange in Lieu of Conversion 75 ARTICLE 15 REPURCHASE OF NOTES AT OPTION OF HOLDERS Section 15.01.[Reserved] 76 Section 15.02.Repurchase at Option of Holders Upon a Fundamental Change 76 Section 15.03.Withdrawal of Fundamental Change Repurchase Notice 78 Section 15.04.Deposit of Fundamental Change Repurchase Price 78 Section 15.05.Covenant to Comply with Applicable Laws Upon Repurchase of Notes 79 ARTICLE 16 TAX REDEMPTION Section 16.01.No Redemption Except for Taxation Reasons 80 Section 16.02.Notice of Tax Redemption. 80 Section 16.03.Payment of Notes Called for Tax Redemption 82 Section 16.04.Holders’ Right to Avoid Redemption 82 Section 16.05.Restrictions on Tax Redemption 83 ARTICLE 17 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 17.01.Provisions Binding on Company’s Successors 83 Section 17.02.Official Acts by Successor Corporation 83 Section 17.03.Addresses for Notices, Etc 83 Section 17.04.Governing Law; Jurisdiction 84 Section 17.05.Evidence of Compliance with Conditions Precedent; Certificates and Opinions of Counsel to Trustee 84 Section 17.06.Legal Holidays 85 Section 17.07.No Security Interest Created 85 Section 17.08.Benefits of Indenture 85 Section 17.09.Table of Contents, Headings, Etc 85 Section 17.10.Authenticating Agent 85 Section 17.11.Execution in Counterparts 86 Section 17.12.Severability 86 Section 17.13.Waiver of Jury Trial 87 Section 17.14.Force Majeure 87 Section 17.15.Calculations 87 Section 17.16.USA PATRIOT Act 87 Section 17.17.Service Of Process 87 ivSection 17.18.Waiver Of Immunity 88 EXHIBIT Exhibit AForm of Note A-1 vINDENTURE dated as of December 1, 2014 between NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V., a public company with limited liability (naamlozevennootschap) incorporated under Dutch law, as issuer (the “Company”, as more fully set forth in Section 1.01) and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS, a New York banking corporation, as trustee (the “Trustee”, as more fully set forth in Section 1.01).W I T N E S S E T H:WHEREAS, for its lawful corporate purposes, the Company has duly authorized the issuance of its 1.00% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 (the“Notes”), initially in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $1,150,000,000, and in order to provide the terms and conditions upon which the Notes areto be authenticated, issued and delivered, the Company has duly authorized the execution and delivery of this Indenture; andWHEREAS, the Form of Note, the certificate of authentication to be borne by each Note, the Form of Notice of Conversion, the Form of FundamentalChange Repurchase Notice and the Form of Assignment and Transfer to be borne by the Notes are to be substantially in the forms hereinafter provided; andWHEREAS, all acts and things necessary to make the Notes, when executed by the Company and authenticated and delivered by the Trustee or a dulyauthorized authenticating agent, as in this Indenture provided, the valid, binding and legal obligations of the Company, and this Indenture a valid agreementaccording to its terms, have been done and performed, and the execution of this Indenture and the issuance hereunder of the Notes have in all respects beenduly authorized.NOW, THEREFORE, THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH:That in order to declare the terms and conditions upon which the Notes are, and are to be, authenticated, issued and delivered, and in consideration ofthe premises and of the purchase and acceptance of the Notes by the Holders thereof, the Company covenants and agrees with the Trustee for the equal andproportionate benefit of the respective Holders from time to time of the Notes (except as otherwise provided below), as follows:ARTICLE 1DEFINITIONSSection 1.01. Definitions. The terms defined in this Section 1.01 (except as herein otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwiserequires) for all purposes of this Indenture and of any indenture supplemental hereto shall have the respective meanings specified in this Section 1.01. Thewords “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” and words of similar import refer to this Indenture as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or othersubdivision. The terms defined in this Article include the plural as well as the singular.“Additional Amounts” shall have the meaning specified in Section 4.10(a).“Additional Interest” means all amounts, if any, payable pursuant to Section 4.06(d), Section 4.06(e) and Section 6.03, as applicable.“Affiliate” of any specified Person means any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect commoncontrol with such specified Person. For the purposes of this definition, “control,” when used with respect to any specified Person means the power to direct orcause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract orotherwise; and the terms “controlling” and “controlled” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.“Applicable Law” shall have the meaning specified in Section 17.16.“Bid Solicitation Agent” means the Company or the Person appointed by the Company to solicit bids for the Trading Price of the Notes in accordancewith Section 14.01(b)(i). The Company shall initially act as the Bid Solicitation Agent.“Board of Directors” means the board of directors of the Company or a committee of such board duly authorized to act for it hereunder.“Board Resolution” means a copy of a resolution certified by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Company to have been duly adopted bythe Board of Directors, and to be in full force and effect on the date of such certification, and delivered to the Trustee.“Business Day” means, with respect to any Note, any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which banking institutions in London,United Kingdom or New York, New York are authorized or required by law to close.“Capital Stock” means, for any entity, any and all shares, interests, rights to purchase, warrants, options, participations or other equivalents of orinterests in (however designated) stock issued by that entity.“Change in Tax Law” shall have the meaning specified in Section 16.01(b).“Clause A Distribution” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.04(c).“Clause B Distribution” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.04(c).“Clause C Distribution” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.04(c).“close of business” means 5:00 p.m. (New York City time).“Commission” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.“Common Equity” of any Person means Capital Stock of such Person that is generally entitled (a) to vote in the election of directors of such Person or(b) if such Person is not a 2corporation, to vote or otherwise participate in the selection of the governing body, partners, managers or others that will control the management or policiesof such Person.“Common Stock” means the common shares of the Company, par value €0.20 per share, at the date of this Indenture, subject to Section 14.07.“Company” shall have the meaning specified in the first paragraph of this Indenture, and subject to the provisions of Article 11, shall include itssuccessors and assigns.“Company Order” means a written order of the Company, signed by one of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Executive or any Senior Vice President (whether or not designated by a number or numbers or word or words added before or after the title “Senior VicePresident”) or the Group Treasurer or Assistant Group Treasurer, and delivered to the Trustee.“Conversion Agent” shall have the meaning specified in Section 4.02.“Conversion Date” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.02(c).“Conversion Obligation” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.01(a).“Conversion Price” means as of any date, $1,000, divided by the Conversion Rate as of such date.“Conversion Rate” shall have the meaning specified in Section 14.01(a).“Corporate Trust Office” means the principal office of the Trustee at which at any time its corporate trust business shall be administered, which officeat the date hereof is located at 60 Wall Street, 16th Floor, Mail Stop: NYC60 1630, New York, New York 10005, Attention: Corporates Team, NXP, or suchother address as the Trustee may designate from time to time by notice to the Holders and the Company, or the principal corporate trust office of anysuccessor trustee (or such other address as such successor trustee may designate from time to time by notice to the Holders and the Company).“Custodian” means the Trustee, as custodian for The Depository Trust Company, with respect to the Global Notes, or any successor entity thereto.“Daily Conversion Value” means, for each of the 30 consecutive VWAP Trading Days during the relevant Observation Period, one-thirtieth(1/30th) of the product of (a) the Conversion Rate on such VWAP Trading Day and (b) the Daily VWAP on such VWAP Trading Day.“Daily VWAP” means, for each of the 30 consecutive VWAP Trading Days during the applicable Observation Period, the per share volume-weightedaverage price as displayed under the heading “Bloomberg VWAP” on Bloomberg page “NXPI
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above