Quarterlytics / Real Estate / Real Estate - Services / Optibase Ltd.

Optibase Ltd.

obas · NASDAQ Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker obas
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Real Estate
Industry Real Estate - Services
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · Optibase Ltd.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2019

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

 ☐☐☐☐

 ☒☒☒☒

 ☐☐☐☐

 ☐☐☐☐

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-29992

OPTIBASE LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s
 name into English)

Israel
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
 or organization)

8 Hamenofim Street
Herzliya 4672559, Israel
+972-73-7073700
(Address of principal executive offices)

Mr. Amir Philips, Chief Executive Officer
Telephone Number: +972-73-7073700, Fax Number: +972-73-7946331, Email: amirp@optibase-holdings.com
8 Hamenofim Street
Herzliya 4672559, Israel
(Name, Telephone, E-Mail and/or Facsimile and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class
Ordinary Shares,
par-value NIS 0.65 each

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The Nasdaq Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Not Applicable

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 5,216,256 Ordinary 

Shares, par value NIS 0.65 per share, including 17,895 Ordinary Shares held by the Registrant awarding their holders no voting or equity rights.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐          No  ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes ☐          No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months 

(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒         No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted 

pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒         No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer, 

“large accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer ☐          Accelerated filer ☐          Non-accelerated filer ☒

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended 
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ☒

International Financing Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board ☐

Other ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Item 17 ☐          Item 18 ☐

Yes ☐          No ☒

- 2 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTION FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEE
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATE PURCHASERS
ITEM 16F. CHANGES IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

- 3 -

4
4
5
5
5
5
19
33
33
49
62
70
73
73
88
89
90
90
90
90
91
91
91
91
92
92
92
92
92
93
93
93
93

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

In this annual report, unless otherwise provided, references to the “Company,” “Optibase”, “we”, “us” or “our” are to Optibase Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Israel, and 
its wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, references to our financial statements are to our consolidated financial statements, except as the context otherwise requires. References to “U.S.” or
“United States” are to the United States of America, its territories and its possessions.

In this annual report, references to “$” or “dollars” or “U.S. dollars” or “USD” are to the legal currency of the United States, references to “CHF” are to Swiss Francs, references to “€”
or “Euro” or “EUR” are to the legal currency of the European Union and references to “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels, the legal currency of Israel. The Company’s financial statements are 
presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. Except as otherwise specified, financial information is presented in U.S. dollars. References 
to a particular “fiscal” year are to the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31 of such year.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

IN ADDITION TO HISTORICAL INFORMATION, THIS ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A 
OF  THE  SECURITIES  ACT  OF  1933,  AS  AMENDED,  AND  SECTION  21E  OF  THE  SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934,  AS  AMENDED.  THE  FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS 
CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE REFLECTED IN 
THE  FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS.  FACTORS  THAT  MIGHT  CAUSE  SUCH  A  DIFFERENCE  INCLUDE,  BUT  ARE  NOT  LIMITED  TO,  THOSE  DISCUSSED  IN  THE  SECTIONS 
ENTITLED “RISK FACTORS”, “INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY” AND “OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS” AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. READERS 
ARE  CAUTIONED  NOT  TO  PLACE  UNDUE  RELIANCE  ON  THESE  FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS,  WHICH  REFLECT  MANAGEMENT’S  BELIEFS,  ASSUMPTIONS  AND 
EXPECTATIONS  OF  OUR  FUTURE  OPERATIONS  AND  ECONOMIC  PERFORMANCE,  TAKING  INTO  ACCOUNT  CURRENTLY  AVAILABLE  INFORMATION.  IN  ADDITION,  READERS 
SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THE OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT AND IN THE COMPANY’S PERIODIC REPORTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FROM TIME TO TIME. WE DO NOT UNDERTAKE ANY OBLIGATION TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHETHER 
AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE, EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED UNDER APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

- 4 -

 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

PART I

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

3.A. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

We derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018 and consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 
from the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally 
accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, and audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. We derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the 
years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in 
this Form 20-F that were also prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. The selected financial data set forth below should be 
read in conjunction with and are qualified by reference to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the financial statements, and notes thereto and other financial information 
included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

2014

Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2018

Fixed income from real estate rent

  $

13,938 

  $

15,273 

  $

16,338 

  $

16,587 

  $

16,608 

Costs and expenses:
Cost of real estate operation
Real estate depreciation and amortization
General and Administrative
Other operating costs
Total costs and expenses
Gain on sale of operating properties
Operating income

Other income
Financial expenses, net
Net income before taxes on income
Taxes on income
Equity share in losses of associates, net

Net income

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase LTD

Net earnings (loss) per share :
Basic and Diluted net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
Basic and diluted net income per share from discontinued operations

Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share

2,777 
3,813 
2,167 
- 
8,757 
2,709 
7,890 

394 
(1,151)  
7,133 
(1,502)  
(186)  

2,958 
3,925 
1,849 
2,352 
11,084 
- 
4,189 

429 
(1,807)  
2,811 
(1,609)  
(31)  

3,159 
4,244 
2,615 
- 
10,018 
- 
6,320 

1,116 
(3,366)  
4,070 
(1,627)  
(323)  

3,057 
4,209 
2,698 
- 
9,964 
- 
6,623 

597 
(2,769)  
4,451 
(1,602)  
(1,677)  

  $

  $

  $
  $

  $

5,445 

  $

1,171 

  $

2,120 

  $

1,172 

  $

2,106 
3,339 

  $

2,239 
(1,068)   $

1,925 
195 

  $

2,295 
(1,123)   $

0.65 
0.00 

  $
  $

0.65 

  $

(0.21)   $
  $
0.00 

(0.21)   $

0.04 
0.00 

  $
  $

0.04 

  $

(0.22)   $
  $
0.00 

(0.22)   $

Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted net 
earnings (loss) per share (in thousands):
Basic
Diluted

5,133 
5,133 

5,147 
5,157 

5,180 
5,180 

5,127 
5,131 

- 5 -

2,991 
4,317 
3,500 
- 
10,808 
- 
5,800 

607 
(2,882)
3,525 
(1,464)
(2,765)

704 

2,077 
(2,781)

(0.54)
0.00 

(0.54)

5,185 
5,185 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
2014

Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

2017

2018

  $

  $

22,902 
14,500 
185,204 
218,004 
112,481 
138,886 
77,075 

  $

  $

23,806 
10,360 
214,840 
262,944 
161,100 
138,949 
75,584 

  $

  $

16,024 
97 
207,690 
250,384 
149,781 
139,148 
74,128 

  $

  $

20,268 
8,927 
216,726 
259,303 
155,181 
139,163 
77,068 

  $

  $

13,836 
2,662 
212,349 
243,958 
144,309 
139,181 
73,393 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

Cash and cash equivalents
Working capital
Real estate property net
Total assets
Long term loans and bonds, including current maturities
Capital Stock
Total shareholders’ equity

3.B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not applicable.

3.C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

3.D. RISK FACTORS

Our  business  operations  are  subject  to  various  risks  resulting  from  changing  economic,  political,  industry,  business  and  financial  conditions.  In  addition,  this  annual  report 
contains  various  forward-looking  statements  that  reflect  our  current  views  with  respect  to  future  events  and  financial  results.  Below  we  attempt  to  identify  and  describe  the  principal 
uncertainties and risk factors that in our view at the present time may affect our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and our forward-looking statements. Readers are 
reminded that the uncertainties and risks identified below in this annual report do not purport to constitute a comprehensive list of all the uncertainties and risks, which may affect our 
business and the forward-looking statements in this annual report. In addition, we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new 
information, future events or otherwise.

Risks Relating to the Economy, Our Financial Condition and Shareholdings

We have a history of losses and we might not be able to sustain profitability.

In 2014 and 2016 we were profitable, while in 2015, 2017, and 2018 we operated at a loss. During 2015, we operated at a loss mainly due to acquisition-related costs of $2.4 million related 
to the acquisition of the twenty-seven (27) supermarkets in Bavaria. During 2017 and 2018, we operated at a loss mainly due to equity losses related to the investment in 300 River Holdings, LLC, 
which beneficially owns the rights to a 23-story Class A office building located at 300 South Riverside Plaza in Chicago, IL.

As of December 31, 2018, we have accumulated losses of $85 million. Given current market conditions, the demand for our real estate properties and other expenses, we may operate at a 
loss and may not be able to sustain profitability in the future, and our operating results for future periods will continue to be subject to numerous uncertainties and risks. We cannot assure you 
that we will be able to increase our revenues and sustain profitability. For further details regarding our cash flow, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and 
Capital Resources”.

We may be affected by instability in the global economy, including the recent European economic and financial turmoil.

Instability in the global credit markets, including the European economic and financial turmoil related to sovereign debt issues in certain countries, the instability in the geopolitical 
environment in many parts of the world and other disruptions, such as changes in energy costs, may continue to put pressure on global economic conditions. The world has experienced a global 
macroeconomic downturn, and if global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in key markets, remain uncertain, stagnant or deteriorate further, we may experience material 
adverse impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

- 6 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our ability to freely operate our business is limited as a result of certain covenants included in the deed of trust of our Series A Bonds.

The deed of trust governing the Series A Bonds, or the Series A Deed of Trust, contains a number of covenants that limit our operating and financial flexibility (such as our minimum 
equity (excluding minority interest) will not be less than $33 million; our equity (including minority interest) to balance sheet ratio will not be less than 25%; and the net financial debt to CAP ratio 
will not be greater than 70%). For a description of Series A Deed of Trust, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources”. As of December 31, 
2018 the outstanding amount under the Series A Bonds was 7.9 million.

Our ability to continue to comply with these and other obligations depends in part on the future performance of our business. Such covenants may hinder our ability to finance our 
future operations or the manner in which we operate our business. In particular, any non-compliance with our financial covenants and other undertakings under Series A Deed of Trust could 
result in demand for immediate repayment of the outstanding amount under the Series A Bonds and restrict our ability to obtain additional funds, which could have a material adverse effect on 
our business, financial condition and our results of operations.

We may continue to seek to expand our business through acquisitions that could result in a diversion of resources and our incurring additional expenses, which could disrupt our business 
and harm our financial condition.

As  we  have  done  in  the  past,  we  may  in  the  future  continue  to  pursue  acquisitions  of  businesses,  or  the  establishment  of  joint  ventures,  that  could  expand  our  business.  The 
negotiation  of  potential  acquisitions  or  joint  ventures  as  well  as  the  integration  of  an  acquired  or  jointly  developed  business,  could  cause  diversion  of  management’s  time  as  well  as  our 
resources. Future acquisitions could result in:

•

•

•

•

•

•

Additional operating expenses without additional revenues;

Potential dilutive issuances of equity securities;

The incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities;

Amortization of bargain purchase gain and other intangibles;

Impairment charges; and

Other acquisition-related expenses.

Acquired  businesses  or  joint  ventures  may  not  be  successfully  integrated  with  our  operations.  If  any  acquisition  or  joint  venture  were  to  occur,  we  may  not  receive  the  intended 

benefits of the acquisition or joint venture. If future acquisitions disrupt our operations, our business may suffer.

A large percentage of our ordinary shares are held by one shareholder who could significantly influence the outcome of actions.

The  Capri  Family  Foundation,  or  Capri,  a  foundation  organized  under  the  laws  of  the  Republic  of  Panama,  beneficially  owns,  directly  and  indirectly  through  its  subsidiaries, 
approximately 73.03% of our outstanding ordinary shares as of March 20, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter. For further information, see Item 4.A. “History and Development of The Company”
and Item 7.A. “Major Shareholders” below. As a result of such holdings in our ordinary shares, Capri can significantly influence the outcome of corporate actions requiring an ordinary majority 
approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions.

We are currently, and may be in the future, the target of securities class action, derivative claim or other litigation, which could be costly and time consuming to defend.

In the past, following a period of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action lawsuits, derivative claims and other actions have often been taken 
against public companies and their directors and officers. Recent years have been characterized by a substantial increase in the number of requests for certification of class actions and derivative 
claims filed and approved in Israel. In May 2015, we were served with a motion to approve the filing of a derivative claim against the Company's controlling shareholder, directors and CEO and 
certain former controlling shareholder and directors, which is still pending, in which we are sued for approximately $41.9 million. If this motion is approved and the derivative claim is accepted, 
this may have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Additionally, and due to the nature of derivative claims, regardless of its outcome, and even if the claims are without merit, we may 
incur substantial costs and our management resources that are diverted to defending such litigation. For information regarding a pending litigation with LEM Switzerland SA, or LEM, one of our 
material tenants pursuant to which LEM argues a reduction of its rent as well as related damages, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings”.

- 7 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have experienced significant fluctuations in our results of operations at times in the past and expect these fluctuations to continue. These fluctuations may result in volatility in our 
share price.

We have experienced at times in the past, and may in the future experience, significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results. Factors that may contribute to the fluctuations in 

our quarterly results of operations include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

The purchase or failure to purchase real-estate assets;

Changes in rent prices for our properties;

Changes in presence of tenants and tenants' insolvency;

Changes in the availability, cost and terms of financing;

The ongoing need for capital improvements;

Changes in foreign exchange rates;

Changes in interest rates; and

General economic conditions, particularly in those countries or regions in which we operate.

It is likely that in some future periods, our operating results may be below expectations of public market analysts or investors. If this occurs, the market price of our ordinary shares may 

drop.

The trading price of our ordinary shares has been volatile, and may continue to fluctuate due to factors beyond our control.

The trading price of our ordinary shares is and will continue to be subject to significant fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

Availability of funding resources for the acquisition of new real estate assets;

General market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors;

Seizure of a substantial business opportunity by our competitors or us;

Changes in interest rates;

Changes in foreign exchange rates;

The entering into new businesses;

Quarterly variations in our results of operations or in our competitors’ results of operations; and

Changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts.

This volatility may continue in the future. In addition, any shortfall or changes in our revenues, operating income, earnings or other financial results could cause the market price of our 
ordinary shares to fluctuate significantly. In recent years, the stock market has experienced significant price and trading volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the market price of 
many companies and which may not be related to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market fluctuations have affected and may continue to affect adversely the market 
price of our ordinary shares. In recent years, the trading price of our ordinary shares has been highly volatile. From January 2018 through March 20, 2019, the closing price of our ordinary shares 
listed on the NASDAQ Global Market fluctuated reaching a high of $10.2 and decreasing to a low of $7.42. The fluctuations and factors listed above, as well as general economic, political and 
market conditions may further materially adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares.

- 8 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our effective tax rate could be materially affected by several factors including, among others, changes in the amount of income taxed by or allocated to the various jurisdictions in which 
we operate that have differing statutory tax rates, changing tax laws, regulations and interpretations of such tax laws in multiple jurisdictions.

We conduct our business globally and file income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. We report our results of operations based on our determination of the amount of taxes owed in the 
various jurisdictions in which we operate. The determination of our consolidated provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires estimation, judgment and calculations where the 
ultimate tax determination may not be certain. Our determination of tax liability is always subject to review or examination by authorities in various jurisdictions.

If a tax authority in any jurisdiction reviews any of our tax returns and proposes an adjustment, including as a result of a determination that the transfer prices and terms we have applied 

are not appropriate, such an adjustment could have a negative impact on our financial results.

There is a substantial risk that we are a passive foreign investment company, and holders of our ordinary shares who are United States residents face income tax risks.

There is a substantial risk that we are a passive foreign investment company, commonly referred to as PFIC. Our treatment as a PFIC could result in a reduction in the after-tax return to 
the holders of our ordinary shares and would likely cause a reduction in the value of such ordinary shares. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable 
year in which either (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of all of our assets for the taxable year produce or are held for the production of 
passive income. For this purpose, cash and real estate properties are considered to be an asset, which produces passive income. As a result of our substantial cash position and the decline in 
the value of our stock, we believe that there is a substantial risk that we may have been a PFIC during the taxable year ended December 31, 2018, under a literal application of the asset test 
described above, which looks solely to the market value. If we are classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, highly complex rules would apply to U.S. holders owning ordinary 
shares. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the application of such rules. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC in the 
future, because the determination of whether we are a PFIC is based upon the composition of our income and assets from time to time, and such determination cannot be made with certainty until 
the end of a calendar year. United States residents should carefully read “Item 10.E. Taxation” under the heading “United States Federal Income Tax Consequences” below for a more complete 
discussion of the U.S. federal income tax risks related to owning and disposing of our ordinary shares.

We do not intend to pay dividends.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance operations and expand our business and, 

therefore, do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

We manage our available cash through investments in various bank deposits and money market funds with leading banks. We are exposed to the credit risk of such banks.

 During 2018, our available cash was invested in various bank deposits and money market funds with various banks. Our available cash is subject to the credit risk of the banks with 

which the funds are deposited and as such we may suffer losses if those banks fail to repay those deposits.

The extenuations given to us as a foreign private issuer impact our publicly available information.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to file less information with the SEC than a company incorporated in the United States. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available 

information concerning us than there is for companies incorporated in the United States.

- 9 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We  are  obligated  to  develop  and  maintain  proper  and  effective  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting.  These  internal  controls  may  not  be  determined  to  be  effective,  which  may 
adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our ordinary shares.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over 
financial reporting on an annual basis. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. During the 
evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective. 
We are required to disclose changes made in our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally 
attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 since the company is non-accelerated filer.

Risks Relating to our Business

The real estate sector continues to be cyclical and affected by changes in general economic, or other business conditions that could materially adversely affect our business or financial 
results.

The real estate sector has been cyclical historically and continues to be significantly affected by changes in industry conditions, as well as in general and local economic conditions, 

such as:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

employment levels;

availability of financing for homebuyers and for real estate investors/funds;

interest rates;

consumer confidence and expenditure;

levels of new and existing homes for sale;

demographic trends;

urban development and changes;

housing demand;

local laws and regulations; and

acts of terror, floods or earthquakes.

These may occur on a global scale, like the recent housing downturn, or may affect some of the regions or markets in which we operate. An oversupply of alternatives to our real estate 

properties can also reduce our ability to lease spaces and depress lease prices, thus reducing our margins.

As a result of the foregoing matters, we may face difficulties in the leasing of our projects and we may not be able to recapture any increased costs by raising lease payments.

We rely on one large property for a significant portion of our revenue.

As of December 31, 2018, our commercial property, CTN complex, in Geneva, Switzerland, accounted for approximately 64% of our portfolio annualized rent. Our revenue would be 
materially adversely affected if this property was materially damaged or destroyed. Additionally, our revenue would be materially adversely affected if rental payments at this property decrease 
or if tenants at this property fail to timely make rental payments due to adverse financial conditions or otherwise, default under their leases or file for bankruptcy. For information regarding the 
CTN  complex  and  regarding  a  pending  litigation  with  LEM  pursuant  to  which  LEM  argues  a  reduction  of  its  rent  as  well  as  related  damages,  see  Item  8  “Financial  Information  - Legal
Proceedings”.

With respect to our commercial properties, we are dependent on the continued tenant demand for our properties. If there is a decrease in tenant demand and an increase in vacancy of our 
commercial properties, it would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We own, through our subsidiaries, holdings in several commercial real estate properties, which are currently leased to third parties. In most of our commercial properties we rely on a few 
tenants which occupy a significant portion of the available rentable area in such properties. For further details regarding the leases of tenants in our properties see Item 4.B. “Business Overview -
Properties”. If the lease agreements with such tenants are terminated, there is no assurance that we will be able to attract new lessees in favorable terms or at all, which would materially adversely 
affect our financial condition and results of operations.

- 10 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Economic recession, pressures that affect consumer confidence, job growth, energy costs and income gains can affect the financial condition of prospective tenants, and a continuing 
soft economic cycle may impact our ability to find tenants for our properties. Failure to attract tenants, the termination of a tenant’s lease, or the bankruptcy or economic decline of a tenant may 
adversely affect the rent fees for our properties and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may have difficulties leasing real-estate properties.

The  fixed  income  real-estate  sector  relies  on  the  presence  of  tenants  in  the  real-estate  assets.  The  failure  of  a  tenant  to  renew  its  lease,  the  termination  of  a  tenant’s  lease,  or  the 
bankruptcy or economic decline of a tenant can have a material adverse effect on the economic performance of the real-estate asset. There can be no assurance that if a tenant were to fail to 
renew its lease, we would be able to replace such tenant in a timely manner or that we could do so without incurring material additional costs. In addition, we are dependent on our ability to enter 
into new leases on favorable terms with third parties, in order to receive a profitable price for each real-estate property. We may find it more difficult to engage tenants to enter into leases during 
periods  when  market  rents  are  increasing,  or  when  general  consumer  activity  is  decreasing,  or  if  there  is  competition  for  tenants  from  competing  properties.  The  existence  of  competitive 
alternatives could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. The global economic condition, pressures that affect consumer confidence, 
job growth, energy costs and income gains can affect retail sales growth, and a continuing soft economic cycle, may impact our ability to find tenants for our properties. Failure to attract tenants, 
the termination of a tenant’s lease, or the bankruptcy or economic decline of a tenant may adversely affect the price obtainable for our real estate projects and adversely affect our financial 
condition and results of operations. The failure of tenants to abide by the terms of their agreements may cause delays or result in a temporary or long term decline in rental income, the effects of 
which we may not be able to offset due to difficulties in finding a suitable replacement tenant.

We are depended on the solvency of our tenants and may lease properties at below expected rental rates.

Rental leases may decrease below our expectations. In the case of such decrease, or if circumstances arise beyond our control, such as market prices, market demand and negative 
trends, we may have to sell a project at a price below our projections. In addition, we could be in a position where there would be no demand at acceptable prices and we would be required to 
hold, operate and maintain the project until the financial environment would improve and allow its disposal.

In addition, the ability to collect rents depends on the solvency of the tenants. Tenants may be in default or not pay on time, or we may need to reduce the amount of rents invoiced by 

lease incentives, to align lease payments with the financial situation of some tenants. In all of these cases, tenant insolvency may hurt our operational results.

We may experience future unanticipated expenses.

Our performance depends, among others, on our ability to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance and other operating costs, including real estate taxes. All of these expenditures 
could increase over time, and may be more expensive than anticipated. Sources of labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may also be more 
expensive than we expected. An unplanned deviation from one of the above expenditures, and other, could increase our operating costs.

The fair value of our real estate may be harmed by certain factors, which may entail impairment losses not previously recorded which, in turn, will adversely affect our financial results.

Certain circumstances may affect the fair value of our real estate assets and/or on certain of our shareholding rights in the companies owning such assets, including, among other 
things, (i) the absence of or modifications to permits or approvals required for the operation of any real estate asset; (ii) lawsuits that are pending, whether or not we are a party thereto. In 
addition, certain laws and regulations, applicable to our business in certain countries where the legislation process undergoes constant changes, may be subject to frequent and substantially 
different interpretations; (iii) agreements which may be interpreted by governmental authorities so as to shorten the term of use of real estate, and which may be accompanied by a demolition 
order with or without compensation, may significantly affect the value of such real estate asset. The fair value of our real estate assets may be significantly decreased, thereby resulting in 
potential impairment losses not previously recorded in our financial results.

- 11 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Since market conditions and other parameters (such as macroeconomic environment trends, and others), which affect the fair value of our real estate, vary from time to time, the fair value 
may not be adequate on a date other than the date the measurement was executed (in general, immediately after the annual balance sheet date). In the event the projected forecasts regarding the 
future cash flows generated by those assets are not met, we may have to record an additional impairment loss not previously recorded.

In addition, any change in the yield rate of any of our real estate assets may cause a significant decrease to the fair value of such assets, thereby resulting in potential impairment losses 

not previously recorded in our financial results.

We may not be able to raise additional financing for our future capital needs on favorable terms, or at all, which could limit our growth and increase our costs and could adversely affect 
the price of our ordinary shares.

Real estate activities are largely financed from external sources. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain financing on favorable terms for our future real estate activities, or at 
all. In addition, an adverse change can occur in the terms of the financing that we receive. Any such occurrence could increase our financing costs and/or result in a material adverse effect on 
our results and ability to develop our real estate business. The amount of long term loans currently outstanding may inhibit our ability to obtain additional financing for our future capital needs, 
inhibit our long-term expansion plans, increase our costs and adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares.

It  is  probable  that  we  will  need  to  raise  additional  capital  in  the  future  to  support  our  strategic  plans.  We  cannot  be  certain  that  we  will  be  able  to  obtain  additional  financing  on 

commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, this could inhibit our growth and increase our operating costs.

In the event we are unable to continuously comply with the covenants, including with respect to financial covenants, which we undertook with respect to our properties, our results of 
operations may be adversely affected.

In connection with the financing of most of our properties, we have long-term agreements with several banks. The agreements that govern the provision of financing include, among 
other  things,  undertakings  and  financial  covenants  that  we  are  required  to  maintain  for  the  duration  of  such  financing  agreements.  For  further  details see  Item  5.B.  “Liquidity  and  Capital 
Resources”. Those existing agreements allow the lender to demand an immediate repayment of the loans in certain events (events of default), including, among other things, a material adverse 
change in the Company's business and noncompliance with the financial covenants set forth in those agreements. The occurrences of any event of default may have an adverse effect on our 
financial position and results of operations and on our ability to obtain outside financing for our continued growth.

Rapid and significant changes in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.

We have financed the purchase of the CTN complex and the Rumlang property with loans bearing floating interest rates and further refinanced during 2017 the existing loan secured by 
our condominium units in Miami with a loan which bears a floating interest rate (as of December 31, 2018 the balance of all such loans was $111.5 million, see also Item “Item 5.B Operating and 
Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”). As a result, we are exposed to changes in the LIBOR interest rate (LIBOR on the US Dollar and LIBOR on the CHF). An 
increase in the LIBOR interest rate could materially adversely affect our financial expenses and thereby our profitability. In light of the low interest rate environment we have also decided at this 
stage not to perform hedging against our exposure to such changes in interest rates.

- 12 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
An adverse change in the Swiss real estate market will adversely affect our results of operations.

Two of our investments, including our most significant property (the CTN complex in Geneva), are located in Switzerland. From 2013 to 2018, as Swiss interest rates declined, Swiss real 
estate prices increased mainly due to the low interest rates and lack of investment alternatives. Along with the historically low interest rates, the overall availability of financing has decreased 
significantly as LTV (Loan to Value) rates have been reduced by lenders, leading to more pressure on leveraged transactions further decreasing investments yields. At the same time, there was 
no increase in the demand for new rental spaces and the rental market appeared to be keeping stable with a slight slowdown, in particular the demand for prime office space and the price for such 
real estate properties. In addition and partially due to the low available yields in the investment market, there is a significant increase in new developments, based on available equity investments 
(as opposed to leveraged investments). Such investments will mature and be available in the near future and may have a significant impact on our rental properties as they will significantly 
increase the availability of rentable area in the vicinity of our rental properties. Any significant adverse change in the real estate market in Switzerland, such as lack of attractive financing, a 
decline in the real estate rates or decrease in demand for the type of properties we own, will adversely affect our results of operations.

We may suffer adverse consequences if our revenues decline since our operating costs do not necessarily decline in proportion to our revenue.

We earn a significant portion of our income from renting our properties. Our operating costs, however, do not fluctuate in relation to changes in our rental revenue. As a result, our 
costs will not necessarily decline even if our revenues do. Similarly, our operating costs could increase while our revenues stay flat or decline. In either such event, we may be forced to borrow to 
cover our costs or we may incur losses.

Because of our small size, we rely on a small number of personnel who possess both executive and financial expertise, and the loss of any of these individuals would hurt our ability to 
implement our strategy and may adversely affect our financial results.

Because  of  our  small  size  and  our  reliance  on  a  limited  financial  and  management  personnel,  our  continued  growth  and  success  depends  upon  the  continued  contribution  of  the 
managerial skills of our financial and management personnel. If any of the current members of the management is unable or unwilling to continue in our employ, our results of operations could be 
adversely affected.

We may experience difficulties in finding suitable real-estate properties for investment, either at all or at viable prices.

Being a company that engages in investments in real-estate, finding a suitable real-estate property for investment is critical to our income. Such finding becomes difficult as the demand 
for real-estates in the markets we are involved in grows, and the supply decreases. Therefore, difficulties in finding suitable real-estate properties for investment may affect our growth and the 
number of assets we have to offer, and therefore materially affect our potential profit and our business and results of operation.

The choice of suitable locations for real estate projects is an important factor in the success of the individual projects. For example, office space should ideally be located within, or near, 
the city center, with well-developed transportation infrastructure (road and rail) located in close proximity to facilitate customer access. If we are not able to find sites in the target cities which 
meet our criteria or which meet our price range, this may materially adversely affect our business and results of operation.

In  addition,  we  may  be  unable  to  proceed  with  the  acquisition  of  properties  because  we  cannot  obtain  financing  on  favorable  terms  or  at  all.  We  may  require  substantial  up-front
expenditures for property acquisition. Accordingly, we may require substantial amounts of cash and financing from banks and other capital resources (such as institutional investors and/or the 
public) for our real estate operations. We cannot be certain that such external financing would be available on favorable terms or on a timely basis or at all.

- 13 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We may acquire individual properties and portfolios of properties, including large portfolios that could significantly increase our size and alter our capital structure. Our acquisition 

activities may be exposed to, and their success may be adversely affected by, the following risks:

•

even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, it is usually subject to customary conditions to closing, including due diligence investigations to our satisfaction;

• we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms or at all; 

•

acquired properties may fail to perform as we expected; 

• we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for new properties; and

• we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and therefore our results 

of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We may acquire properties or property holding companies subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if 
a liability were asserted against us arising from our ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Unknown 
liabilities with respect to properties acquired might include:

•

•

•

•

liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination; 

claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising from dealing with the former owners of the properties; 

liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; and 

claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.

 The illiquidity of real-estate properties may affect our ability to sell our properties.

Real estate properties in general are relatively illiquid. Such illiquidity may affect the ability to dispose of or liquidate part of real-estate assets in a timely fashion and at satisfactory 

prices in response to changes in the economic environment, the real estate market or other conditions.

An adverse change in the German real estate market will adversely affect our results of operations.

Since 2015, we have owned through our wholly-owned subsidiary, a portfolio of supermarkets located mainly in Bavaria, Germany. As the European economy have been stagnant at 
best  over  the  last  few  years,  the  German  economy  and  its  real  estate  sector  have  shown  significant  signs  of  improvement  also  fueled  by  a  steady  decrease  in  interest  rates,  an  increase  in 
availability  of  financing  and  the  increasing  demand  for  real  estate  investments  by  foreign  investors  drawn  to  the  German  market  by  the  reduced  availability  of  other  rewarding  investment 
opportunities in the European market. During 2018, the German real estate market has shown signs of maturity and stabilization. Availability of financing and interest rates are stable, as well as 
the demand for rental properties. Any significant adverse change in the real estate market in Germany, such as an increase of interest rates, a decrease in availability of financing, a decline in the 
real estate rates or decrease in demand for the type of properties we own, will adversely affect our results of operations.

- 14 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
An adverse change in the U.S. real estate market will adversely affect our results of operations.

We own, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, several U.S. real estate properties located in Philadelphia, Texas, Chicago and Miami, From 2014 to 2017, the U.S. real estate market has 
shown signs of improvement and a consistent increase in assets prices as the demand for investments increased significantly also driven by financial institutions increased willingness to finance 
new transactions along with low interest rates. Throughout 2018, we have witnessed certain changes in the U.S real estate market. While the commercial segment has remained stable along with a 
steady demand for commercial and office space rental, the high-end residential market has experienced a significant decrease in the demand for investment properties along with an increase in the 
availability of such assets, which in turn, has put pressure on the prices of such properties. Any significant adverse change in the real estate market in the United States, such as a significant 
increase of interest rates, a decline in the real estate rates or decrease in demand for the type of properties we own, will adversely affect our results of operations.

With respect to our residential properties in Miami, Florida, the success of our investment will depend on market conditions.

We own, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, 25 residential properties in Miami and Miami Beach, Florida, including 21 luxury condominium units and two penthouse units in the 
Marquis Residences, one penthouse unit in Ocean One Condominium and one condominium units in the Continuum on South Beach Condominium. To date, 23 of the units have been fully 
constructed and are in rentable condition, while two penthouses are still undergoing renovations and remodeling. Currently 18 of the units are occupied by tenants and the remaining units are 
being marketed to potential tenants and potential buyers. For further information, see Item 4.B. “Business Overview - Real Estate Business”.

We intend to keep holding the units for investment purposes and will consider renting or selling the units in accordance with our business considerations and market conditions. 
Depending on our decision, we may be unable to sell or lease up these condominium properties on schedule or on favorable terms, which may result in a decrease in expected rental revenues 
and/or lower yields, if any.

We depend on partners in our partnerships and collaborative arrangements.

We currently, with respect to our real-estate properties in Geneva, Switzerland, Philadelphia, Chicago and Texas, and we may, in the future, own interests in real-estate assets or real-
estate holding companies in partnership with other entities. Our investments in these partnerships may, under certain circumstances, be subject to (i) the risk that one of our partners may become 
bankrupt or insolvent or may not fulfill its financial obligations under our partnership agreements, which may cause us to provide financing in excess of our ownership share or which may cause 
us  to  be  unable  to  fulfill  our  financial  obligations,  possibly  triggering  a  default  under  our  bank  financing  agreements  or,  in  the  event  of  a  liquidation,  preventing  us  from  managing  or 
administering our business or entail a compulsory sale of the asset at less favorable terms; (ii) the risk that one of our partners may have economic or other interests or goals that are inconsistent 
with our interests and goals, and that such partner may be in a position to veto actions which may be in our best interests; and (iii) the possibility that disputes may arise regarding the continued 
operational requirements of our assets that are jointly owned. In addition, we hold approximately 30%, approximately 22% and approximately 4%, respectively, of the beneficial interest in the real-
estate properties located in Chicago, Philadelphia and Texas. Our minority interest causes us to rely on our partners to manage the properties, and our influence over decisions regarding the 
properties and their management is limited.

Cause of physical damages and other nature losses may affect our properties.

Properties could suffer physical damage caused by fire or other causes, resulting in losses which may not be fully compensated by insurance. In addition, there are certain types of 
losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, floods, terrorism or acts of war that may be uninsurable or are not economically insurable. Inflation, changes in building codes 
and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors, including terrorism or acts of war, also might result in insurance proceeds being insufficient to repair or replace a property if it is 
damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds may be inadequate to restore the economic position with respect to the affected properties. Should an uninsured loss 
or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose capital invested in the affected property as well as anticipated profits from that property. No assurance can be given that material losses 
in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future.

Competition for acquisitions may reduce the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and increase the costs of those acquisitions.

We plan to continue acquiring properties as we are presented with attractive opportunities. We may face competition for acquisition opportunities from other investors, particularly 

private investors who can incur more leverage, and this competition may adversely affect us by subjecting us to the following risks:

•

•

an inability to acquire a desired property because of competition from well-capitalized real estate investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private real estate 
funds, domestic and foreign financial institutions, life insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, pension trusts, partnerships and individual investors; and 

an increase in the purchase price for such acquisition property, in the event we are able to acquire such desired property.

- 15 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Environmental discoveries may have a significant impact on the value, viability and marketability of our assets.

We may encounter unforeseen decrease in value of our assets due to factors beyond our control caused by previously unknown soil contamination or the discovery of archaeological 
findings which may have a significant impact and a detrimental effect on the value, viability or marketability of our assets or cause legal liability in connection with our real estate properties. We 
may be liable for the costs of removal, investigation or remedy of hazardous or toxic substances located on or in a site owned or leased by us, regardless of whether we were responsible for the 
presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of any required removal, investigation or remedy of such substances may be substantial and/or may result in significant budget 
overruns. The presence of such substances, or the failure to remedy such substances properly, may also adversely affect our ability to sell or lease such property or to obtain financing using the 
real estate as security. Additionally, any future sale of such property will be generally subject to indemnities and warranties to be provided by us to the purchaser against such environmental 
liabilities. Accordingly, we may continue to face potential environmental liabilities with respect to a particular property even after such property has been sold. Laws and regulations may also 
impose liability for the release of certain materials into the air or water from a property, and such release can form the basis for liability to third persons for personal injury or other damages. Other 
laws  and  regulations  can  limit  the  development  of,  and  impose  liability  for,  the  disturbance  of  wetlands  or  the  habitats  of  threatened  or  endangered  species.  Any  environmental  issue  may 
significantly cause decrease in value of our assets or vacancy periods in our leased properties, which could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of that asset and our results of 
operations and cash flows.

We are exposed to cyber security risks that, if materialized, may adversely affect our business and operations.

Our  operations  rely  on  computer,  information  and  communications  technology  and  various  computer  hardware  and  software  applications.  Despite  our  implementation  of  network 
security measures, our tools and servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems and tools located at 
customer sites, or could be subject to system failures or malfunctions for other reasons. System failures or malfunctioning could disrupt our operations and our ability to timely and accurately 
process and report key components of our financial results.

Risks Relating to the Sale of our Video Solutions Business

On March 16, 2010 we and our subsidiary, Optibase Inc., entered into an asset purchase agreement for the sale of all of the assets and liabilities related to our Video Solutions Business. 

For further details see Item 10.C “Material Contracts”. The following is a risk related to the sale of our Video Solutions Business:

We have been and may, in the future, be subject to further review in connection with government programs that we participated in or received.

During our activities in the Vitec Solutions Business, we received grants from the Israel Innovation Authority, or the IIA, in the Israeli Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor for research 
and development programs that meet specified criteria. In addition, we were also involved in joint research projects with European Companies under the auspices of, and with financial assistance 
from, the European Union Research and Development Framework Programs.

In that respect, during 2009 and 2010 we were audited by the European Union, or the EU, for grants received under three FP6 contracts. As a result of the audit findings implementation, 

during 2012, we paid an aggregate amount of approximately Euro 340,000 which settled and concluded the financial audit.

Furthermore, we were undergoing an audit by the IIA for royalties paid before the sale of our Video Solutions Business. A payment to the IIA will adversely affect our cash flow, 
although from financial prospective, at this time, we believe that we have sufficient provisions to cover the final outcome of such review processes. For further details see Item 4.B “Business
Overview - Remaining items of the Video Solution Business”.

In addition to such audits, we may in the future be subject to further reviews in connection with government programs that we participated in or received during our activities in the 

Video Solutions Business. Any review of such kind could result in substantial cost which would have a negative impact on our financial condition.

- 16 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risks Relating to Operations in Israel

The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law.

We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our articles of association and by the Israeli Companies Law, 
1999, or the Companies Law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, pursuant to 
the Companies Law each shareholder of an Israeli company has to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations toward the company and other shareholders 
and to refrain from abusing his or her power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders and class meetings, on amendments to a company’s
articles  of  association,  increases  in  a  company’s  authorized  share  capital,  mergers,  and  transactions  requiring  shareholders’ approval  under  the  Companies  Law.  In  addition,  a  controlling 
shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote, or who has the power to appoint or prevent the 
appointment of a director or officer in the company, or has other powers toward the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. However, Israeli law does not define the substance of 
this  duty  of  fairness.  Because  Israeli  corporate  law  has  undergone  extensive  revision  in  recent  years,  there  is  little  case  law  available  to  assist  in  understanding  the  implications  of  these 
provisions that govern shareholder behavior.

Because a significant amount of our revenues is generated in Swiss Francs and in Euro but a portion of our expenses is incurred in New Israeli Shekels and in US dollars, our results of 
operations may be harmed by currency fluctuations.

Our management believes that the U.S. dollar is the currency in the primary economic environment in which we operate. Thus, our functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. 
Notwithstanding, we generate a significant amount of our revenues in CHF (Swiss Franc) and in Euro and incur a portion of our expenses in NIS and in U.S. dollars. As a result, we are exposed to 
currency fluctuation of the U.S. dollar against the CHF the Euro and the NIS.

The fluctuations in the dollar costs of our operations in Israel related primarily to the costs of salaries in Israel, which are paid in NIS and constitute a portion of our expenses and the 
interest and principal payments of our series A bonds are made in NIS. We cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future if inflation in Israel exceeds the fluctuation of 
NIS against the U.S dollars or if the timing of such fluctuation lags behind increases in inflation in Israel.

Our operations could also be adversely affected if we are unable to guard against currency fluctuations in the future. Accordingly, we perform hedging transactions from time to time 
according  to  our  board's  approval.  In  the  future  we  may  enter  into  additional  currency  hedging  transactions  to  decrease  the  risk  of  financial  exposure  from  fluctuations.  These  measures, 
however, may not adequately protect us from adverse effects due to the impact of inflation in Israel.

The deflation rate in Israel was approximately (0.2) % in 2016, an inflation rate of approximately 0.4% in 2017and a deflation rate of approximately (0.2) % in 2018. The changes of the NIS 
against the dollar was an appreciation of approximately 1.5% in 2016, 9.8% in 2017, and a devaluation of approximately (8.1)% in 2018. The change of the CHF against the dollar was a devaluation 
of approximately (2.8)% in 2016, an appreciation of approximately 4.4% in 2017, and a devaluation of approximately (0.8)% in 2018. The change of the Euro against the dollar was a devaluation of 
approximately (3.6)% in 2016, an appreciation of approximately 13.7%  in 2017 and  a devaluation of approximately (4.5)% 2018.

- 17 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our shares are listed for trade on more than one stock exchange, which may result in price variations.

Our ordinary shares are listed for trade on The NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd., or TASE. This may result in price variations. Our ordinary shares are 
traded on these markets in different currencies, U.S. dollars on The NASDAQ Global Market and New Israeli Shekels on the TASE. These markets have different opening times and close on 
different days. Different trading times and differences in exchange rates, among other factors, may result in our shares being traded at a price differential on these two markets. In addition, market 
influences in one market may influence the price at which our shares are traded on the other.

Potential political, economic and military instability in Israel and its region may adversely affect our results of operations.

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, our principle offices are located in central Israel and some of our officers, employees and directors are residents of Israel. 
Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly influence us. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed 
conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, and a state of hostility, varying from time to time in intensity and degree, has led to security and economic problems for Israel. 
Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partners could adversely affect our operations and results of operations 
and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. In addition, recent political uprisings and conflicts in various countries in the Middle East, including Egypt and Syria, are affecting the 
political stability of those countries. It is not clear how this instability will develop and how it will affect the political and security situation in the Middle East. This instability has raised concerns 
regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. It is also widely believed that Iran, which has previously threatened to attack Israel, has been stepping up its efforts to 
achieve nuclear capability. Iran is also believed to have a strong influence among extremist groups in the region, such as Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. The tension between Israel 
and Iran and/or these groups may escalate in the future and turn violent, which could affect the Israeli economy generally and us in particular. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political 
instability in the region could adversely affect our business conditions, harm our results of operations and adversely affect our share price. No predictions can be made as to whether or when a 
final resolution of the area’s problems will be achieved or the nature thereof and to what extent the situation will impact Israel’s economic development or our operations.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.

The Companies Law provides that certain purchases of securities of a public company are subject to tender offer rules. As a general rule, the Companies Law prohibits any acquisition 
of shares in a public company that would result in the purchaser holding 25% or more, or more than 45% of the voting power in the company, if there is no other person holding 25% or more, or 
more than 45% of the voting power in a company, respectively, without conducting a special tender offer.

The Companies Law further provides that a purchase of shares or voting rights of a public company or a class of shares of a public company, which will result in the purchaser's holding 
90% or more of the company’s shares or class of shares, is prohibited unless the purchaser conducts a full tender offer for all of the company’s shares or class of shares. The purchaser will be 
allowed to purchase all of the company's shares or class of shares (including those shares held by shareholders who did not respond to the offer), if either (i) the shareholders who do not accept 
the offer hold, in the aggregate, less than 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class, and more than half of the shareholders who do not have a 
personal interest in the offer accept the offer, or (ii) the shareholder who do not accept the offer hold less than 2% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable 
class.  The  shareholders,  including  those  who  indicated  their  acceptance  of  the  tender  offer  (except  if  otherwise  detailed  in  the  tender  offer  document),  may,  at  any  time  within  six  months 
following the completion of the tender offer, petition the court to alter the consideration for the acquisition. At the request of an offeree of a full tender offer which was accepted, the court may 
determine that the consideration for the shares purchased under the tender offer, was lower than their fair value and compel the offeror to pay to the offerees the fair value of the shares. Such 
application to the court may be filed as a class action.

- 18 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Israeli courts might not enforce judgments rendered outside of Israel, which may make it difficult to collect on judgments rendered against us.

We are incorporated in Israel. Most of our directors and officers are not residents of the United States and some of their assets and our assets are located outside the United States. 
Service of process upon our non-U.S. resident directors and officers and enforcement of judgments obtained in the United States against us, and our directors and executive officers may be 
difficult to obtain within the United States.

We  have  been  informed  by  our  Israeli  legal  counsel,  that  there  is  doubt  as  to  the  enforceability  of  civil  liabilities  under  U.S.  securities  laws  in  original  actions  instituted  in  Israel. 

However, subject to certain time limitations, an Israeli court may declare a foreign civil judgment enforceable if it finds that all of the following terms are met:

•

•

•

•

The judgment was rendered by a court which was, according to the laws of the state of the court, competent to render the judgment;

The judgment can no longer be appealed;

The  obligation  imposed by  the judgment  is  enforceable  according  to  the  rules  relating  to  the  enforceability  of judgments  in  Israel  and  the  substance  of  the judgment  is  not 
contrary to public policy; and

The judgment is executory in the state in which it was given.

Even if the above conditions are satisfied, an Israeli court will not enforce a foreign judgment if it was given in a state whose laws do not provide for the enforcement of judgments of 
Israeli courts (subject to exceptional cases) or if its enforcement is likely to prejudice the sovereignty or security of the State of Israel. An Israeli court will also not declare a foreign judgment 
enforceable in the occurrence of any of the following:

•

•

•

•

The judgment was obtained by fraud;

There was no due process;

The judgment was rendered by a court not competent to render it according to the laws of private international law in Israel;

The judgment is at variance with another judgment that was given in the same matter between the same parties and which is still valid; or

• At the time the action was brought in the foreign court a suit in the same matter and between the same parties was pending before a court or tribunal in Israel.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

4.A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

History

                We are a real estate company engaged through our subsidiaries in purchasing and operating of real estate properties intended for leasing and resale primarily for the purpose of 
commercial, industrial, office space use as well as for residential purposes.

                We were founded and incorporated in the State of Israel in 1990 under the name of Optibase Advanced Systems (1990) Ltd. In November 1993 we changed our name to Optibase Ltd. 
Our ordinary shares have been trading on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “OBAS” since our initial public offering on April 7, 1999.

                We listed our ordinary shares for trade on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd., or the TASE, on August 6, 2007. On September 23, 2008, we decided to delist our ordinary shares from trade 
on the TASE. The delisting of our ordinary shares from trade on the TASE was effective on September 28, 2008. The last day for trading of our ordinary shares on the TASE was September 24, 
2008. In April 2015, we listed again our ordinary shares for trade on the TASE under the symbol "OBAS". According to the Israeli legislation, Israeli companies whose shares are traded on 
certain stock exchanges outside of Israel are allowed to have shares listed on the TASE, while reporting, in substance, in accordance with the provision of the relevant foreign securities law 
applicable to the Company. In August 2015, we completed an offering of NIS 60 million non-convertible bonds to the public in Israel and such bonds have been traded on the TASE. For further 
information, see “Item 5.B Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

- 19 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commencing in February 2001, Festin Management Corp., a British Virgin Island corporation jointly owned by Shlomo (Tom) Wyler and Arthur Mayer-Sommer began to acquire our 
ordinary shares on the open market. On September 10, 2004, Festin Management Corp. transferred all of its holdings in us to its shareholders. In addition, during 2008 and 2011, we issued an 
aggregate number of 1,063,381 ordinary shares in a private placement to Mr. Wyler, who was considered, until September 12, 2012, our controlling shareholder, and as of the date of this annual 
report, serves as the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, Optibase Inc. Since 2012, Capri, our current controlling shareholder, and Gesafi Real Estate S.A., a Panama Corporation, or Gesafi, 
acquired 1,797,290 of our ordinary shares from Mr. Wyler. In addition, during November 2013, Gesafi transferred all of our ordinary shares held by it to Capri and on December 31, 2013, we issued 
a net sum of 1,300,580 of our ordinary shares to Capri, in consideration for twelve luxury condominium units purchased by us. During January-February 2015, Capri acquired an additional 71,229 
of our ordinary shares in two different transactions with an unrelated third party and on the Nasdaq Global Market.  For additional information see Item 7.A. “Major Shareholders”.

From our formation until 2010 we were engaged in the Video Solution Business. On May 11, 2009, our board of directors resolved to expand and diverse our operations and enter into the 
fixed-income real estate sector. At a special shareholders meeting held on June 25, 2009, our shareholders approved the diversification of our operations by entering into the fixed income real-
estate sector. Such approval was sought solely for cautionary purposes and without any obligation to do so. As of the date hereof, we have entered into certain agreements for the purchase of 
real estate assets. For further information, see Item 4.B “Business Overview” and Item 10.C “Material Contracts”.

On March 16, 2010, we and our subsidiary, Optibase Inc., entered into an asset purchase agreement with Optibase Technologies Ltd. and Stradis Inc., wholly owned subsidiaries of S.A. 
Vitec (also known as Vitec Multimedia), pursuant to which Optibase Technologies Ltd. and Stradis Inc. purchased all of the assets and liabilities related to our video solutions business. The 
closing of the transaction occurred on July 1, 2010.

Our  principal  executive  offices  are  located  at  8  Hamenofim  Street,  Herzliya  4672559,  Israel,  and  our  telephone  number  at  that  location  is  +972-73-7073700.  Our  website  is  located  at 
www.optibase-holdings.com. We  use  a  local  agent  in  California  for  administrative  purposes  and  domestic  filings,  which  is  Formation  Solutions  Inc.  400  Continental  Boulevard,  6th  Floor  El 
Segundo, CA 90245.

4.B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

The real estate market includes the purchasing and operating of real estate properties intended for leasing and resale primarily for the purpose of commercial, industrial, office space, 
parking garage, warehouse use as well as for residential purposes. The real estate market is affected by growth or slowdown in the economy, and by changes in the demand and the available 
supply of commercial and/or residential properties, as well as the construction of additional commercial and/or residential properties. The real estate market is also affected by governmental, 
municipal and tax authority policies regarding planning, building, marketing and taxation of land.

Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2008 and as a result of the global economic and financial market crisis, there has been a slowdown in the real estate market which is evidenced by a 
decline in the number of real estate transactions, a reduction in the availability of credit sources, an increase in financing costs and stricter requirements by banks for providing such financing. 
During the last few years and through 2016, the situation has changed in certain of the real estate markets we are active in (i.e., Central and Western Europe and North America) as interest rates 
decreased and financial institutions were more inclined to grant financing for qualified assets. This has led to increased demand for real estate properties and an increased volume of transactions 
in most asset classes. During 2017 and 2018, the real estate market have yet experienced additional changes as financial institutions have again decreased the availability of financing resulting in 
more equity being invested in transactions.

•

Our strategy in our real estate activities is to become a substantial owner of properties. To achieve this goal, we intend to pursue a number of operating and growth strategies, which 
include: purchase of real estate mainly in Central and Western Europe, North America and Israel;

- 20 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•

•

•

•

developing and improving existing real estate;

maximize the leasing of existing properties to commercial users;

increase and develop unused building rights in our existing properties; and

acquire additional commercial, residential and other real estate assets in light of market conditions, while diversifying our real estate property base.

As of the date of this annual report, our portfolio includes the holdings of interests in six operating commercial properties as well as condominium units in three residential projects.

- 21 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
Properties

The following table provides details regarding real-estate assets properties wholly owned or controlled by us or by our subsidiaries, as of the date of this annual report:

Property

Location

Acquisition
Date

Company
Stake

Nature of 
Rights

Property Type

Net
Rentable
Square Meters
Excluding
Redevelopment
Space(1)

Annualized
Rent
($000)(2)

Rate of 
Occupancy (3)

Centre des 
Technologies
Nouvelles (CTN)

Edeka
supermarkets

Rümlang

Geneva,
Switzerland

March 2, 2011

51%

Ownership with 
land lease

Commercial

35,800

10,998

Bavaria, Germany

June 2, 2015 and 
July 8, 2015

100%

Ownership

Commercial

Rümlang,
Switzerland

October 29, 2009

100%

Ownership

Commercial

Miami, Florida

Miami, Florida

2010-2013

100%

Ownership

Residential -
Condominium
Units

37,000

12,500

4,260

3,264

1,843

1,060

96%

97%

90%

72%

Annualized
Rent per
Occupied
Square
Meter
($)(4)

320

91

165

345

Portfolio Total/ 
Weighted Average

-

-

-

-

-

89,560

17,165

94%

203

(1) Net rentable square meters at a building represents the current square meter at that building under lease as specified in the lease agreements plus management’s estimate of space available for 
lease based on engineering drawings. Net rentable square meter includes tenants’ proportional share of common areas but excludes space held for redevelopment.

(2) Annualized rent represents the monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of December 31, 2018 multiplied by 12.

(3) Excludes space held for redevelopment. Includes unoccupied space for which we are receiving rent and excludes space for which leases had been executed as of December 31, 2018, but for 
which we are not receiving rent. We estimate the total square meter available for lease based on a number of factors in addition to contractually leased square meter, including available power, 
required support space and common area.

(4) Annualized rent per square meter represents annualized rent as computed above, divided by the total square meter under lease as of the same date.

- 22 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-GAAP Net Operating Income (“NOI”)

Net Operating Income, or NOI, is a non-GAAP financial measure. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is operating income, which, to calculate NOI, is adjusted to add back real 
estate  depreciation  and  amortization  and  general  and  administrative  expenses  and  other  operating  costs  less  gain  on  sale  of  operating  properties.  We  use  NOI  internally  as  a  performance 
measure  and  believe  that  NOI  (when  combined  with  the  primary  GAAP  presentations)  provides  useful  information  to  investors  regarding  our  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations 
because it reflects only those income and expense item that are incurred at the property level.

 A reconciliation of GAAP operating income to Non-GAAP NOI is as follows:

GAAP Operating income

Adjustments:

Real estate depreciation and amortization
General and administrative

Non-GAAP Total Net Operating Income (NOI)

Year Ended December 31
Thousands US$
2017

2018

2016

6,320   

6,623 

5,800 

4,244   
2,615   

4,209 
2,698 

4,317 
3,500 

13,179   

13,530 

13,617 

We  consider  the  NOI  to  be  an  appropriate  supplemental  non-GAAP  measure  to  operating  income  because  it  assists  management,  and  thereby  investors,  to  understand  the  core  property 
operations prior to depreciation and amortization expenses and general and administrative costs. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead structures, with 
varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, we consider the NOI to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or groups of assets.

The metric NOI should only be considered as supplemental to the metric operating income as a measure of our performance. NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it 
indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions. NOI should also not be used as a supplement to, or substitute for, cash flow 
from operating activities (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States).

Non-GAAP Funds From Operation (“FFO”) and Non-GAAP Recurring FFO (“Recurring FFO”)

Funds  from  operation,  or  FFO,  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure.  The  most  directly  comparable  GAAP  financial  measure  is  net  income,  which,  to  calculate  FFO,  is  adjusted  to  add  back 
depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated associates. We make certain adjustments to FFO, which it refers to as recurring FFO, to account for items we do not 
believe are representative of ongoing operating results, including transaction costs associated with acquisitions. We use FFO internally as a performance measure and we believe FFO (when 
combined with the primary GAAP presentations) is a useful, supplemental measure of our operating performance as it’s a recognized metric used extensively by the real estate industry. We also 
believe that Recurring FFO is a useful, supplemental measure of our core operating performance. The company believes that financial analysts, investors and shareholders are better served by 
the presentation of operating results generated from its FFO and Recurring FFO measures.

- 23 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
A reconciliation of GAAP net income to Non-GAAP FFO and Recurring FFO is as follows:

Year Ended December 31
Thousands US$
2017

2018

2016

GAAP Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd.

195   

(1,123)  

(2,781)

Adjustments:

Real estate depreciation and amortization
Pro rata share of real estate depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated associates
Non-controlling interests share in the above adjustments
Non-GAAP Fund From Operation (FFO)

Non- GAAP Recurring Fund From Operation (Recurring FFO)

4,244   
1,282   
(1,142)  
4,579   

4,579   

4,209 
2,022 
(1,141)  
3,967 

3,967 

4,317 
2,610 
(1,136)
3,010 

3,010 

We consider the FFO and Recurring FFO to be an appropriate supplemental non-GAAP measure to operating income because it assists management, and thereby investors, in analyzing our 
operating performance.

The metric’s FFO and Recurring FFO should only be considered as supplemental to the metric net income as a measure of our performance. FFO (i) does not represent cash flow from operations 
as defined by GAAP, (ii) is not indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs, including the ability to make distributions, (iii) is not an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity, 
and (iv) should not be considered as an alternative to net income (which is determined in accordance with GAAP) for purposes of evaluating our operating performance.

- 24 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
The following table provides details regarding our non-controlled real-estate assets or projects in which we indirectly own a minority stake, as of the date of this annual report:

Property

Location

Acquisition
date

Company
Stake

Nature of 
Rights

Property Type

Net
Rentable
Square Feet
Excluding
Redevelopment
Space(1)

Annualized
Rent
($000)(2)

Rate of 
Occupancy (3)

Annualized
Rent per
Occupied
Square
Feet
($)(4)

2 Penn Center Plaza

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania

October 12, 2012

22.16%

Houston, Dallas, 
San Antonio, 
Texas

300 South 
Riverside Plaza, 
Chicago

December 31, 
2012

December 29, 
2015

4%

30%

Texas Shopping 
Centers Portfolio

South Riverside 
Plaza Office Tower

Portfolio Total/ 
Weighted Average

Beneficial
interest in the 
owner of the 
property

Beneficial
interest in the 
portfolio

Beneficial
interest in the 
owner of the 
property

Commercial

520,285

12,958

96%

Commercial

2,124,500

27,275

94%

Commercial

1,065,497

19,692

95%

-

-

-

-

-

3,710,282

59,925

95%

26

14

19

17

(1) Net rentable square feet at a building represents the current square meter at that building under lease as specified in the lease agreements plus management’s estimate of space available for 
lease based on engineering drawings. Net rentable square meter includes tenants’ proportional share of common areas but excludes space held for redevelopment.

(2) Annualized rent represents the monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of December 31, 2018 multiplied by 12.

(3) Excludes space held for redevelopment. Includes unoccupied space for which we are receiving rent and excludes space for which leases had been executed as of December 31, 2018, but for 
which we are not receiving rent. We estimate the total square meter available for lease based on a number of factors in addition to contractually leased square meter, including available power, 
required support space and common area.

(4) Annualized rent per square meter represents annualized rent as computed above, divided by the total square meter under lease as of the same date.

- 25 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Set forth below is additional information with respect to our projects:

Geneva, Switzerland

On  March  3,  2011,  we  acquired,  through  our  newly  owned  subsidiary,  an  office  building  complex  in  Geneva,  Switzerland  known  as  Centre  des  Technologies  Nouvelles,  or  CTN 
complex. The acquisition was undertaken by OPCTN S.A., or OPCTN, a Luxembourg company owned 51% by Optibase and 49% by The Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd. and The Phoenix 
Comprehensive Pension, or, collectively, The Phoenix. OPCTN executed the transaction by acquiring all of the shares of the property owner, Eldista. The seller, Apollo CTN. S.a.r.l, is an entity 
majority owned by area property partners.

The transaction was based on a property value of CHF 126.5 million, including existing non-recourse mortgage financing in the principal amount of CHF 85.3 million provided by Credit 
Suisse  (app.  $136.5  million  and  $92.4  million  respectively,  as  of  the  purchase  date).  The  purchase  price  for  the  transaction  was  approximately  CHF  37.7  million  (app.  $40.6  million,  as  of  the 
purchase date).

The CTN complex is a six-building complex located in the Plan-Les-Ouates business park in the outskirts of Geneva. The complex includes approximately 35,500 square meters of leasable 
space (app. 377,000 square feet), is currently leased to 47 tenants, primarily in the field of advanced industries including biotech electronic and information technology industries, and is currently 
96% occupied.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding leases of tenants in the CTN Complex, as of December 31, 2018:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Sub-total
Vacant
Total

Number of tenants 
whose
leases will expire*  
9 
12 
5 
10 
13 
6 
55 
- 
55 

Total area covered
by these leases

Area covered
by these leases 
(%)

Annual rent
at expiration 
($000)

Percent of annual 
rent at expiration 
(%)

3,673 
11,436 
1,509 
4,964 
9,058 
3,566 
34,206 
1,605 
35,581 

10.26%   
31.93%   
4.21%   
13.86%   
25.29%   
9.96%   
95.52%   
4.48%   
100%   

726 
3,802 
485 
1,488 
3,028 
1,188 
10,717 
- 
10,717 

6.77%
35.47%
4.53%
13.89%
28.26%
11.09%
100%
- 
100%

* The leases with the tenants described in the above table include either fixed end date, or notice periods ranging from one to twelve months. Number of tenants includes several 

tenants with multiple lease agreements with different expiration dates.

In connection with the transaction, Optibase and The Phoenix entered into an agreement regarding their shareholdings in OPCTN. The agreement provides that Optibase will make day-

to-day decisions and provide The Phoenix with customary protective rights. For further information see Item 10.C “Material Contracts”.

- 26 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
For a summary of the principal terms of the financing agreement entered by us for the purchase of the CTN complex, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -

Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

For information regarding a pending litigation with LEM Switzerland SA, or LEM, one of our material tenants in the CTN complex, pursuant to which LEM argues a reduction of its rent 

as well as related damages, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings”.

Rümlang, Switzerland

On October 29, 2009, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l., acquired a commercial building located at Riedmattstrasse 9, Rümlang from the Swiss property company Zublin 
Immobilien AG. Rümlang is situated 15 km from Zurich and as many commercial buildings due to its strategic location in proximity to Zurich international airport. The purchase price for the 
transaction was approximately CHF 23.5 million of which CHF 18.8 million (app. $22.8 million and $18.1 million respectively, as of the purchase date) was financed by a local Swiss bank pursuant 
to a mortgage agreement.

The five-story building includes 12,500 square meters (approximately 135,000 square feet) of rentable space with office, laboratory and retail uses. The office building in Rümlang is 

currently leased to 13 tenants, and is currently 90% occupied.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding leases of tenants in the Rümlang property, as of December 31, 2018:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Sub-total
Vacant
Total

Number of tenants 
whose
leases will expire* 
3 
2 
1 
2 
5 
13 
- 
13 

Total area covered
by these leases

Area covered
by these leases 
(%)

Annual rent
at expiration 
($000)

Percent of annual 
rent at expiration 
(%)

1,080 
431 
3,369 
4,617 
1,673 
11,170 
1,209 
12,379 

8.72%  
3.48%  
27.22%  
37.30%  
13.51%  
90.23%  
9.77%  
100%  

188 
99 
422 
629 
226 
1,564 
- 
1,564 

12.03%
6.34%
26.97%
40.21%
14.44%
100%
- 
100%

* The leases with the tenants described in the above table include either fixed end date, or notice periods ranging from three to six months.

For details regarding an option agreement granted to Swiss Pro for the purchase of twenty percent (20%) of the shares of Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l, the owner of the property, see Item 10.C 

“Material Contracts”. For details on a legal claim filed by Swiss Pro against our subsidiaries, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings”.

- 27 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For a summary of the principal terms of the financing agreement entered by us for the purchase of the Rumlang property, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -

Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Two Penn Center Plaza in Philadelphia, PA

On October 12, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase 2 Penn, LLC, acquired an approximately twenty percent (20%) beneficial interest in the owner of a Class A twenty story 

commercial office building in Philadelphia known as Two Penn Center Plaza.

The  transaction  was  based  on  a  valuation  of  Two  Penn  Center  Plaza  of  approximately  $66  million,  including  existing  non-recourse  mortgage  financing  in  the  principal  amount  of 
approximately $51.7 million provided by UBS Real Estate Securities, or UBS. The UBS mortgage loan has a fixed interest rate of 5.61%, maturing in May 2021, and requiring monthly payments of 
principal and interest of approximately $300,000. We made a capital contribution of approximately $4 million to acquire a 19.66% indirect beneficial interest in the owner of the property. As of 
December 31, 2018, the indirect beneficial interest is 22.16%. For further information, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions”.

Optibase 2 Penn, LLC is a limited partner in a larger joint venture that owns 99% of the beneficial interests in the owner of the Two Penn Center. Two Penn Center has approximately 
525,000 rentable square feet and is located in the Center City neighborhood of Philadelphia opposite City Hall and Love Park. The building is currently leased to 148 tenants, primarily for general 
office and retail related usage. As of December 31, 2018, the Two Penn Center was 96% occupied and the annual rental income for the year 2018 totaled to approximately $12 million.

Texas Shopping Centers Portfolio

On December 31, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, OPTX Equity LLC, acquired an approximately 4% beneficial interest in a portfolio of Texas shopping centers. OPTX Equity LLC 
undertook this investment as an approximately 16.5% limited partner in Global Texas, LP a Florida limited partnership that is controlled by Global Fund Investments. Global Texas, LP is a limited 
partner in Global Texas Portfolio, LP a joint venture that acquired 49% of the beneficial interests in a shopping center portfolio. The partnership agreement of Global Texas, LP provides for 
contributions of capital and distributions of proceeds pro rata among the partners according to their respective partnership interests. OPTX Equity LLC has the right to participate in certain 
major decisions of Global Texas, LP that require the approval of 51% of the Global Texas, LP partnership interests.

In connection with the transaction, our wholly-owned subsidiary, OPTX Lender LLC, became an owner of approximately 16.5% of the partnership interests in Global Texas Lender, LP a 
Florida limited partnership. Global Texas Lender, LP provided a loan to Global Texas Portfolio, LP to finance the purchase price paid by Global Texas Portfolio, LP to acquire its 49% beneficial 
interest in the shopping center portfolio. The terms of the partnership agreement of Global Texas Lender, LP are substantially similar to the terms of the partnership agreement of Global Texas, LP.

The  transaction  was  based  on  a  portfolio  valuation  of  approximately  $342  million  including  existing  nonrecourse  mortgage  financing  in  the  principal  amount  of  approximately  $252 
million. The primary mortgage loan had a fixed interest rate of 5.73% and was refinanced in December 2015 with a mortgage for a $247.5 million with a fixed interest rate of 4.1% matures in January 
2026.

- 28 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At the closing of the transaction, which occurred on December 31, 2012, we made an aggregate capital contribution of approximately $4 million to OPTX Equity LLC and OPTX Lender 

LLC in order to fund our share in the transaction.

The shopping centers portfolio includes more than two million square feet of leasable area and is located in Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio areas of Texas. The leasable  area is

currently 94% occupied. For the year ended on December 31, 2018, Texas shopping centers portfolio annual rental income totaled to approximately $27.7 million.

Marquis Residences in Miami, Florida

On December 30, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase Real Estate Miami LLC, had acquired 21 luxury condominium units in the Marquis Residences in Miami, Florida. The 
condominium units were sold by Leviev Boymelgreen Marquis Developers, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company. In consideration for the 21 condominium units, we paid a net purchase price 
of approximately $8.6 million. In addition to the purchase price, we have invested approximately $823,000 in finishing the units.

 The Marquis Residences is a 67-story tower with 292 luxury residential units ranging from 1,477 to 4,200 square feet, a restaurant, a hotel, a spa and fitness center.

 To date, 18 of the 21 units are rented out and the remaining unit is being offered for rental or sale. We intend to hold the units for investment purposes and will consider to continue 

renting or selling the units in accordance with our business considerations and market conditions.

25 units are pledged in connection with a financing agreement entered into by us, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Penthouses Units in Miami, Florida

On April 9, 2013 and on August 22, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase Real Estate Miami LLC, had acquired two luxury condominium penthouses located in the Marquis
Residence in Miami and one condominium penthouse located in the Ocean One condominium in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida. In consideration for the three penthouses, we paid a net purchase 
price of approximately $4.8 million.

The Ocean One condominium in Sunny Isles Beach is a twin tower project with 241 luxury residential units ranging from 1,990 to 2,610 square feet, with penthouses containing more 

square footage, and the amenities include, 700 feet of ocean frontage, a private beach club, a health and fitness center, a pool and spa and two tennis courts.

To date, one penthouse is still undergoing renovations and remodeling, while the other two unit’s renovation has been recently completed. We intend to hold the remaining units for 

investment purposes and will consider renting or selling the units in accordance with our business considerations and market conditions.

- 29 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Condominium Units in Miami Beach, Florida

On December 31, 2013, our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Optibase FMC LLC and Optibase Real Estate Miami LLC, had acquired twelve luxury condominium units located in the 
Flamingo-South Beach One Condominium and in the Continuum on South Beach Condominium, both located in Miami Beach, Florida, in consideration for the issuance of our 1.37 million newly 
issued ordinary shares (of which approximately 67,000 ordinary shares were off set against the lease of one unit), representing, as of the date of the approval of the transaction by our board of 
directors, a value of approximately $8.8 million. The condominium units were sold by private companies indirectly controlled by Capri, our controlling shareholder. At closing, and following the 
approval of the transaction by our shareholders, we  issued to Capri a net sum of 1,300,580 of our ordinary shares. The net fair value of the condominium units as  recorded in our financial 
statement as of the closing date was approximately $7.2 million, representing the fair value of the ordinary shares issued as of the closing date.

The eleven units at the Flamingo-South Beach One Condominium, or Flamingo Condominium, are located on various floors of the South Building of the Flamingo Condominium, and 
ranging in size from 924 to 2,347 square feet. The Flamingo Condominium is a 15-story tower with 513 luxury residential units ranging in size from approximately 450 to approximately 2,347 square 
feet.  On  October  20,  2014,  we  sold  the  eleven  units  located  in  the  Flamingo  Condominium,  in  consideration  for  an  aggregated  gross  price  of  $6.4  million,  and  we  recorded  a  capital  gain  of 
approximately $2.7 million resulting from such transaction. For further details on the transaction to sell such eleven units, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions” and Item 10.C. “Material
Contracts”.

The unit at the Continuum on South Beach Condominium, or Continuum, is located on the 33rd floor of the North Tower of the Continuum on South Beach Condominium located at 50 S. 
Pointe Drive, Miami Beach, Florida. The Continuum on South Beach Condominium is a 37-story ocean-front tower with 203 luxury residential units ranging in size from 1,554 to 3,497 square feet. 
Residences of the Continuum on South Beach Condominium enjoy the right to use the common areas of the residence, including swimming pool, tennis courts, spa and a sporting club. At the 
closing of the acquisition of the Continuum Unit, the seller of the unit leased the Continuum Unit from us for a term of 36 months. We intend to hold the unit for investment purposes and will 
consider to continue renting or selling the unit in accordance with our business considerations and market conditions.

On December 29, 2016, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our audit committee and board of directors, a new lease agreement to be entered into with an affiliate of 
Capri, or the Tenant. The new lease will be in effect for a one-year term commencing on January 2, 2017, which will be automatically extended by a one-year term and up to a total of three years. 
For further details, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transaction”.

Four units are pledged in connection with a financing agreement entered into by us, that was refinanced in November 2017, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 

- Liquidity and Capital Resources” .For further information, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions”.

German Commercial Properties Portfolio

On December 18, 2014, our wholly owned European subsidiary, Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG, or Optibase Bavaria, entered into a purchase agreement with Lincoln Dreizehnte 
Deutche Grundstucksgellschaft mbH and Lincoln Land Passau GmbH, unrelated third parties, or the Sellers, to acquire a retail portfolio of 26 separate commercial properties in Bavaria, Germany, 
and one commercial property in Saxony, Germany, or the German Portfolio. On June 2, 2015 the closing of the transaction occurred and at the first stage we acquired 25 supermarkets in Bavaria. In 
consideration for the 25 supermarkets, we paid a net purchase price of €24 million. On July 8, 2015 we acquired the two remaining supermarkets for an additional purchase price of €4.75 million.

The German Portfolio represents a homogenous retail portfolio in established retail locations. It has approximately 37,000 square meters of total rental space and currently generates 
annual  net  rental  income  of  approximately  EUR  2.8  million  (app.  $3.3  million).  The  leasable  area  is  currently  97%  occupied,  and  the  properties  have  an  average  remaining  lease  term  of 
approximately five years.

- 30 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The tenants currently operate on the properties includes 26 supermarkets, and one commercial building with partly office use. The largest tenant in the German Portfolio is EDEKA 
Handelsgesellschaft Südbayern mbH, or Edeka, one of the largest supermarket chain in the German market, which currently leases 18 of the rental properties in the German Portfolio. In addition to 
the supermarkets, smaller shops (such as bakeries and post offices) operate on several locations as subtenants of Edeka.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding leases of tenants in the portfolio by property, as of December 31, 2018:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Sub-total
Vacant
Total

Number of tenants 
whose
leases will expire* 
1 
6 
- 
5 
- 
14 
25 
1 
27 

Total area covered
by these leases

Area covered
by these leases 
(%)

Annual rent
at expiration 
($000)

Percent of annual 
rent at expiration 
(%)

1,430 
9,657 
- 
6,716 
- 
17,878 
35,681 
1,307 
36,988 

3.87%  
26.11%  
- 
18.16%  
- 
48.33%  
96.47%  
3.53%  
100%  

165 
841 
- 
576 
- 
1,681 
3,264 
- 
3,264 

5.05%
25.77%

- 

17.66%

- 

51.52%
100%
- 
100%

* Number of tenants by property of which 18 are leased by Edeka.

For a summary of the principal terms of the financing agreement entered by us for the purchase of the portfolio, see Item 5.B “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity

and Capital Resources”.

South Riverside Plaza Office Tower, Chicago

On December 29, 2015, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase Chicago 300 LLC, completed an investment in 300 River Holdings, LLC, or the Joint Venture Company, which beneficially 
owns the rights to a 23-story Class A office building located at 300 South Riverside Plaza in Chicago under a 99 year ground lease expiring in 2114. We invested $12.9 million in exchange for a 
thirty percent (30%) interest in the Joint Venture Company.

The property is located in Chicago’s premier West Loop submarket, along the Chicago River. The building, situated on the riverfront, offering 360 degree views at every level of the 
building, including the following major tenants: Zurich American Insurance, DeVry, Inc., National Futures Association, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Newark Corporation. On June 
17, 2016, and in accordance with our initial investment agreement in 300 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, we have invested an additional amount of $3 million which accrues interest of 12% per 
annum which was distributed back to the Company on November 21, 2017.

- 31 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JPMorgan Chase who was an anchor tenant in the building, occupying approximately 486,000 square feet, or 46% of the rentable area, has exercised its option to terminate its entire 
office space at no penalty on September 2016. As a result, we have secured new leases with a variety of new tenants and we are currently seeking and negotiating additional alternative tenants 
to fulfil the vacant space. To date, approximately 95% of the rentable square feet of the building are secured by various signed lease agreements.

Material Tenants

Our commercial properties in Switzerland are supported by anchor tenants who, due to size, reputation and other factors are considered as such. Our largest tenants in Switzerland are 
LEM SA and Novimune SA, located in the CTN complex. As of December 31, 2018, these tenants occupied approximately 13,000 square meters and accounted for approximately $4.5 million of 
rent income, or approximately 27% of our gross leasable area in Switzerland and approximately 35%, of our annual rent in Switzerland. For further details regarding a pending litigation with LEM, 
pursuant to which LEM argues a reduction of its rent as well as related damages, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings.

Our largest tenant in Germany is Edeka. As of December 31, 2018, Edeka occupied approximately 26,900 square meters and accounted for approximately $2.7 million of rent income, or 
approximately 73% of our gross leasable area in Germany and approximately 80%, of our annual rent in Germany. Our other tenant in Germany is Buchbauer Handelsmärkte GmbH. Or Buchbauer. 
As of December 31, 2018, Buchbauer occupied approximately 5,300 square meters and accounted for approximately $340,000 of rent income, or approximately 14% of our gross leasable area in 
Germany and approximately 12%, of our annual rent. No other tenant accounted for over 10% of our annual rent (on a consolidated basis).

Competition

The real estate market is highly competitive and is characterized by a large number of competitors. The main factor affecting competition in this market is geographic location of property. 
There are properties in close proximity to some of our properties that are similar in purpose and use, which has the effect of increasing competition for the leasing of those properties as well as 
reducing the rental rates for those properties. Other factors affecting competition are the leasing price, the physical condition of the properties and their energy efficiency rate, the finishing of the 
properties and the level of the management services provided to tenants. Furthermore, the overall economic and financial trends as reflected, among other things, in interest rates, may further 
increase competition, leading to a reduction of rental fees and a decline in demand for properties. However, as most of our real estate is leased under medium to long term agreements, we believe 
that our exposure is limited to most of the effects of slowdown in the real estate market, although a significant change in market conditions may adversely affect our ability to maintain current 
rates of occupancy or current rent levels.

Remaining items of the Video Solution Business

In connection with the sale of our Video Solutions Business to Vitec, we transferred all rights related to the support of the IIA for the period ending on the date of the closing of the 
Vitec Transaction to Vitec. Although we have no further obligation to pay royalties on revenues generated by our Video Solutions Business subsequent to its sale. We are currently undergoing 
an audit by the IIA, for royalties paid before the sale of our Video Solution Business. The Company has sufficient provision to cover the expected outcome of such review process.

- 32 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

As of December 31, 2018, we have been managing our activity through our four wholly-owned direct subsidiaries: Optibase Inc. which was incorporated in California in 1991, Optibase 
Real Estate Europe SARL, or Optibase SARL, which was incorporated in Luxembourg in October 2009, our 51% held subsidiary OPCTN S.A., which was incorporated in Luxembourg on February 
24, 2011 and through Optibase RES SARL which was incorporated in Luxembourg on June 11, 2018. Our subsidiaries hold the following companies: Optibase Inc. wholly owns Optibase Real 
Estate Miami LLC, Optibase 2Penn LLC, OPTX Equity LLC, OPTX Lender LLC, Optibase FMC LLC, and Optibase 300 Chicago LLC, all limited liability companies which were incorporated in 
Delaware or Florida. Optibase SARL wholly owns Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG, a German partnership, and Optibase Bavaria Holding GmbH, a German corporation  and Optibase RE2 SARL, 
which were incorporated in Luxemburg. Optibase RES SARL wholly owns Optibase  RE1 SARL which was incorporated in Luxemburg  and OPCTN S.A. wholly owns Eldista GmbH, which was 
incorporated in Switzerland.

Our real estate activity is managed through several subsidiaries held directly and indirectly by Optibase Ltd. or its abovementioned subsidiaries.

4.D. PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT

Our headquarters' offices occupy approximately 3,412 square feet in Herzliya Pituach. Our lease for this space expires in 2020.

Our European subsidiaries occupy offices totaling approximately 500 square feet in Luxembourg. The current leases do not have an expiration date and can be terminated at any time 

with three months prior notice.

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion and analysis about our financial condition and results of operations contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual 
results could differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those set 
forth under “Item 3.D. Risk Factors” above and “Item 5.D. Trend Information” below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this annual report. You should read the following discussion 
and analysis in conjunction with the “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Overview

We invest in the fixed-income real estate field and hold properties and beneficial interest in real-estate assets and projects in various locations. Our revenues are comprised of rental 
income we receive from tenants in our various properties. We derive additional income as dividends and interest from various real estate investments where we hold certain beneficial interests. 
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or U.S. GAAP.

- 33 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The presentation currency of the financial statements is the U.S dollar.

The functional currency of the Company is the U.S Dollar.

The functional currencies of Optibase’s subsidiaries are CHF, EUR and U.S dollar. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the year-end exchange rates and their 
statement  of  operations  items  are  translated  using  the  average  exchange  rates  for  all  periods  presented.  The  resulting  translation  adjustments  are  recorded  as  a  separate  component  of 
accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity.

As  of  December  31,  2018,  we  had  available  cash  and  cash  equivalents  of  approximately  $13.8  million.  As  of  March  20,  2019,  we  have  available  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  of 
approximately $15.4 million. For information regarding the investment of our available cash, see Item 5.B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources”
below.

Our business may be affected by the condition in Israel, see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors”.

Fixed income from real estate rent

Fixed income real-estate consists primarily of revenues derived from real estate properties, held through our subsidiaries, in Switzerland (Rümlang and Geneva), Miami and Germany.

Cost of real estate operations

Cost of real estate operations consist primarily of direct costs associated with operating the real estate properties such as building insurance, management company fees and property 

tax.

Real estate depreciation and amortization

Real  estate  depreciation  and  amortization  consist  primarily  of  depreciation  expenses  related  to  the  value  of  properties  net  of  amounts  accounted  for  land,  as  well  as  amortization 

expenses associated with intangible assets derived from the purchase of real estate properties.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of fees to outside consultants, legal and accounting fees, expenses related to the purchase of real estate assets, stock option 

compensation charges and certain office maintenance costs.

Other operating cost

Other operating cost during 2015 consists of acquisition related cost of $2.4 million related to the acquisition of the twenty-seven (27) supermarkets in Bavaria, Germany.

- 34 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of operating properties

Gain on sale of operating properties consists of sale of eleven condominium units located in Miami Beach, Florida during 2014.

Other income

Other income, net, consists of dividend received and interest income on loan to associated company.

Financial expenses, Net

Financial  expenses  consist  primarily  of  interest  we  paid  in  connection  with  bank  loans,  debt  issuance,  currency  hedging  transactions,  and  losses  from  realization  of  securities  and 
financial instruments. Financial income consists mainly of interest received on deposits and other financial assets held in our bank accounts and gains from realization of securities and financial 
instruments. Our exchange differences occur primarily as a result of the change of the NIS, CHF and Euro value relative to the U.S. dollar.

Taxes on income

Israeli companies are generally subject to corporate tax on their taxable income. As of 2018, the corporate tax rate is 23% (in 2016 and 2017, the corporate tax rate was 25% and 24%, 
respectively). In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 
2016 which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1, 2017 and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA").  The TCJA makes broad and 

complex changes to the Code. The changes include, but are not limited to:

1.

2.

3.

4.

A corporate income tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 ("Rate Reduction");

The transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system by providing a 100 percent deduction to an eligible U.S. shareholder on foreign 
sourced dividends received from a foreign subsidiary;

A one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017; and

Taxation of GILTI earned by foreign subsidiaries beginning after December 31, 2017. The GILTI tax imposes a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets 
of foreign corporations.

Taxable income of Luxemburg, Switzerland, Germany and the United States is subject to tax at the rate of approximately 29%, 24%, 16% and 21% respectively in 2018.

- 35 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have final tax assessments through the tax year 2013.

As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $61 million of net operating loss carry-forwards for Israeli tax purposes. These net operating loss carry-forwards have no expiration date. 
Optibase  Inc.  had  U.S.  federal  net  operating  loss  carry-forward  of  approximately  $47  million  that  can  be  carried  forward  and  offset  against  taxable  income  for  20  years,  no  later  than  2038. 
Utilization of U.S. net operating losses may be subject to the substantial annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and similar state 
provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses before utilization.

Equity share in losses of associates, net

Associates in which we have significant influence over the financial and operating policies without having control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, accordingly 
we recorded during 2018 an equity income in associate of our holdings of Two Penn Center Plaza in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and an equity loss in associate of our holdings of 300 South 
Riverside Plaza in Chicago.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest.

 Net income attributed to non-controlling interest following the acquisition of the CTN property in Geneva, Switzerland in March 2011. We have entered into the said transaction with 

The Phoenix group, who owns 49% of the property. Thus, 49% of the net operating results of the property are attributed to them.

5.A. OPERATING RESULTS

The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 statements of operations data as percentages of our total revenues:

Fixed income from real estate rent
Costs and expenses:

Cost of real estate operations
Real estate depreciation and amortization
General and administrative

Total costs and expenses
Operating income
Other income, net
Financial expenses, net
Income before taxes on income
Taxes on income
Equity share in losses of associates, net

Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd.

2016

Year Ended December 31
2017

2018

100% 

19.3 
26 
16 
61.3 
38.7 
6.8 
(20.6)  
24.9 
(10)  
(2)  

12.9 
11.7 
1.2 

100% 

18.4 
25.4 
16.3 
60.1 
39.9 
3.6 
(16.7)  
26.8 
(9.7)  
(10.1)  
7.0 
13.8 
(6.8)  

100%

18 
26 
21.1 
65.1 
34.9 
3.7 
(17.4)
21.2 
(8.8)
(16.6)
(4.2)
12.5 
(16.7)

- 36 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results of Operations for the Years Ended 2018 and 2017

Fixed income from real estate rent. Our fixed income real estate rent in 2018 and in 2017, totaled to $16.6 million.

Cost of real estate operations. Our cost of real estate operation decreased in 2018 to $3 million, compared to $3.1 million in 2017.

Real estate depreciation and amortization. Our real estate depreciation and amortization increased in 2018 to $4.3 million, compared to $4.2 million in 2017.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased in 2018 to $3.5 million, compared to $2.7 million in 2017, mainly attributable to non-recurring legal 

proceeding expenses due to a claim received by our subsidiary Eldista Gmbh from its tenant as detailed in Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings".

Operating Income. As a result of the foregoing, we recorded operating income of $5.8 million in 2018 compared to an operating income of $6.6 in 2017. The decrease in our operating 

income in 2018, is mainly attributed to increase in general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization, offset by a decrease in cost of real estate operations.

Other income (loss). We recorded other income of $607,000 in 2018, compared to other income of $570,000 million in 2017, related to dividend received and interest income on loan to an 

associated company.

Financial Expenses, Net. We recorded financial expenses, net of $2.9 million in 2018, compared with financial expenses, net of $2.8 million in 2017.

Taxes on Income. We and our subsidiaries account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, or ASC 740. Under the requirements of ASC 740, we reviewed 
all of our tax positions and determined whether the position is more-likely-than-not be sustained upon examination by regulatory authorities. The tax expenses of $1.5 million in 2018, compared to 
$1.6 Million in 2017, mainly related to our Luxemburg and Germany subsidiaries.

Equity share in losses of associates, Net. We recorded an equity gain/loss of $2.8 million in 2018, compared to an equity loss of $1.7 million in 2017, mainly attributable to associated 
with equity losses of Optibase Chicago 300 LLC partially off set by equity gains from 2 Penn Philadelphia LP. For further details regarding 2 Penn Philadelphia LP and Optibase Chicago 300 LLC,
see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions” and Item 10.C “Material Contracts”, respectively.

Net Income. As a result of the foregoing,  recorded net loss of $704,000 in 2018, compared with a net income of $1.2 million in 2017.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest. Net income attributed to non-controlling interest was first recorded in 2011 following the acquisition of the CTN complex in March 

2011. We have entered into the said transaction with The Phoenix, who owns 49% of the property. Thus, 49% of the net operating results of the property are attributed to them.

Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd. Net income (loss) attributed to Optibase Ltd., is the result of net income (loss) as affected by net income attributed to non-controlling

interest. As a result of the foregoing, we recorded net loss of $2.8 million in 2018, compared with a net loss of $1.1 million in 2017.

- 37 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results of Operations for the Years Ended 2017 and 2016

Fixed income from real estate rent. Our fixed income real estate rent increased in 2017 to $16.6 million, compared to $16.3 million in 2016.

Cost of real estate operations. Our cost of real estate operation decreased in 2017 to $3.1 million, compared to $3.2 million in 2016.

Real estate depreciation and amortization. Our real estate depreciation and amortization in 2017 and in 2016, totaled to $4.2.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased in 2017 to $2.7 million, compared to $2.6 million in 2016.

Operating Income. As a result of the foregoing, we recorded operating income of $6.6 million in 2017 compared to an operating income of $6.3 in 2016. The increase in our operating 
income in 2017, is mainly attributed to increase in fixed income from real estate rent and due to decrease in cost of real estate operations, offset by an increase in general and administrative 
expenses.

Other income (loss). We recorded other income of $597,000 in 2017, compared to other income of $1.1 million in 2016, related to dividend received and interest income on loan to an 

associated company. The decrease in other income in 2017 is mainly attributed to the realization of two shopping centers of Texas portfolio during 2016.

Financial Expenses, Net. We recorded financial expenses, net of $2.8 million in 2017, compared with financial expenses, net of $3.4 million in 2017. The decrease can be mainly attributed 

to one-time $335,000 interest refund from the Swiss tax authorities.

Taxes on Income. We and our subsidiaries account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, or ASC 740. Under the requirements of ASC 740, we reviewed 
all of our tax positions and determined whether the position is more-likely-than-not be sustained upon examination by regulatory authorities. The tax expenses of $1.6 million in 2017 and in 2016, 
mainly related to our Luxemburg and Germany subsidiaries.

Equity share in losses of associates, Net. We recorded an equity loss of $1.7 million in 2017, compared to an equity loss of $323,000 in 2016 associated with 2 Penn Philadelphia LP and 
Optibase Chicago 300 LLC. For further details regarding 2 Penn Philadelphia LP and Optibase Chicago 300 LLC, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions” and Item 10.C “Material Contracts”,
respectively.

Net Income. As a result of the foregoing, we recorded net income of $1.2 million in 2017, compared with a net income of $2.1 million in 2016.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest. Net income attributed to non-controlling interest was first recorded in 2011 following the acquisition of the CTN complex in March 

2011. We have entered into the said transaction with The Phoenix, who owns 49% of the property. Thus, 49% of the net operating results of the property are attributed to them.

Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd. Net income (loss) attributed to Optibase Ltd., is the result of net income (loss) as affected by net income attributed to non-controlling

interest. As a result of the foregoing, we recorded net loss of $1.1 million in 2017, compared with a net income of $195,000 in 2016.

- 38 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Critical Accounting Policies

Our  consolidated  financial  statements  are  prepared  in  accordance  with  U.S.  GAAP.  These  accounting  principles  require  management  to  make  certain  estimates,  judgments  and 
assumptions based upon information available at the time that they are made, historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These 
estimates,  judgments  and  assumptions  can  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  as  of  the  date  of  the  financial  statements,  as  well  as  the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and 
expenses during the periods presented.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas 
in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our management reviewed these critical accounting policies and related 
disclosures with our audit committee. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures required 
by U.S. GAAP.

Our management believes the significant accounting policies which affect management’s more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial 

statements and which are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

v 

Long-lived assets including intangible assets

v 

Investment in companies

v 

Contingencies; and

v Income Taxes.

Long- Lived Assets including intangible assets

The  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  long-lived  assets  are  reviewed  for  impairment  in  accordance  with  ASC  360, “Property,  Plant  and  Equipment”, whenever  events  or  changes  in 
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset 
to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which 
the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

The Company reviewed assets on a component-level basis, which is the lowest level of assets for which there are identifiable cash flows that can be distinguished operationally and for 
financial reporting purposes. The carrying amount of the asset group was compared with the related expected undiscounted future cash flows to be generated by those assets over the estimated 
remaining useful life of the primary asset. In cases where the expected future cash flows were less than the carrying amounts of the assets, those assets were considered impaired and written 
down to their fair values. Fair value was established based on discounted cash flows.

Investment in companies

Investments in non-marketable  equity  securities  of  companies  in  which  the  Company  does  not  have  control  or  the  ability  to  exercise  significant  influence  over  their  operation  and 

financial policies are recorded at cost.

- 39 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management evaluates investments in non-marketable equity securities for evidence of other-than temporary declines in value. When relevant factors indicate a decline in value that is 

other-than temporary the Company recognizes an impairment loss for the decline in value.

Contingencies

We periodically estimate the impact of various conditions, situations and/or circumstances involving uncertain outcomes to our financial condition and operating results. These events 
are called “contingencies”, and the accounting treatment for such events is prescribed by the ASC 450 “Contingencies”. ASC 450 defines a contingency as “an existing condition, situation, or 
set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible gain or loss to an enterprise that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur”. Legal proceedings 
are a form of such contingencies.

In  accordance  with  ASC  450,  accruals  for  exposures  or  contingencies  are  being  provided  when  the  expected  outcome  is  probable.  It  is  possible,  however,  that  future  results  of 
operations for any particular quarter or annual period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions, the actual outcome of such proceedings or as a result of the effectiveness of 
our strategies related to these proceedings.

Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” or ASC 740, which prescribes the use of the liability method, whereby 
deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax 
rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company and its subsidiaries provide a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to 
amounts more likely than not to be realized.

ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes by establishing minimum standards for the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken 
in a tax return. Under the requirements of ASC 740, the Company must review all of its tax positions and make a determination as to whether its position is more-likely-than-not to be sustained 
upon examination by regulatory authorities. If a tax position meets the more-likely–than-not standard, then the related tax benefit is measured based on a cumulative probability analysis of the 
amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement or disposition of the underlying issue. Our policy is to accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax 
benefits in our financial expenses.

Recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18), which requires companies to 
include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash  equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-  of-period total amounts 
shown  on  the  statement  of  cash  flows.  The  Company  adopted  ASU  2016-18  during  the  first  quarter  of  2018.  The  adoption  of  this  new  guidance  had  no material  impact  on  the  Company’s
consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flows.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10) - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The 
ASU s effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The ASU, among other targeted changes for financial assets and liabilities: 
requires equity investments with readily determinable fair values to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income. In accordance with ASU 2016-01, an entity may choose to 
measure  equity  investments  that  do  not  have  readily  determinable  fair  values  at  cost  minus  impairment,  if  any,  plus  or  minus  changes  resulting  from  observable  price  changes  in  orderly 
transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issue. The Company has equity investments in a privately-held company. This investment is recorded at cost reduced by any 
impairment write-downs plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer, because it has no 
readily determinable fair values. The investment is included in investments in companies and associates in long term investments the accompanying balance sheets. The Company monitors the 
investment and if facts and circumstances indicate any observable price changes or that the investment may be impaired, then it conducts an impairment test of its investment.

- 40 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New accounting pronouncements not yet effective

In  February  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  2016-02, “Leases”, on  the  recognition,  measurement,  presentation  and  disclosure  of  leases  for  both  parties  to  a  contract  (i.e.,  lessees  and 
lessors). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a 
financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, 
respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset ("ROU") and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a 
term of 12 months or less will be accounted for in a manner similar to the accounting under existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases 
using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales- type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASC 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, 
ASC 840, "Leases". The guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, and the Company has adopted the standard on January 1, 2019. A 
modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. The standard provides a number of optional practical 
expedients in transition. The Company is electing the ‘package of practical expedients’, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, 
lease classification and initial direct costs. To adopt this new standard, the Company has implemented changes to our existing systems and processes in conjunction with a review of existing 
vendor agreements. The Company expect adoption of the standard to have an immaterial impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheets which will result in the recognition of ROU assets 
and lease liabilities of approximately $436 to $528 at January 1, 2019. The most significant impact from recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities relates to our office space. However, the 
Company  do  not  anticipate  that  the  adoption  of  this  standard  will  have  an  immaterial  impact  on  the  operating  expenses  in  our  consolidated  statements  of  operations  since  the  expense 
recognition under this new standard will be similar to current practice. The Company's financial income (expenses), net will be impacted by the revaluation of the lease liabilities in non-USD
denominated currencies. Furthermore, the Company does not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have immaterial impact in their revenue recognition.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which requires that expected credit losses relating to financial assets 
measured on an amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount of credit losses to be recognized for 
available for sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and also requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. The new 
standard will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after January 1, 2020, and early adoption is permitted

5.B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We have funded our operations primarily through private and public sales of our equity securities and banks credit. As of December 31, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $13.8 

million, and as of March 20, 2019, we have available cash, and cash equivalents of approximately $15.4 million.

- 41 -

 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by our operating activities was $6.9 million, $7.9 million, and $7.3 million in December 31 of each of the years 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Net cash provided for 
operating activities in 2018 was primarily the result of net income for the period, as adjusted for depreciation and amortization, equity share in losses of associates, net and decrease in other 
accounts receivable and prepaid expenses, offset by increase in trade receivables, decrease in deferred tax liabilities and in land lease liabilities and decrease in accrued expenses and other 
accounts payable.  Net cash provided for operating activities in 2017 and in 2016 was primarily the result of net income for the period, as adjusted for depreciation and amortization and equity 
share in losses of associates, net, increase in accrued expenses and other accounts payable, offset by the increase in other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and in trade receivables, 
and by decrease in deferred tax liabilities and in land lease liabilities.

Net cash used for investment activities in 2018 totaling $2 million reflects primarily the proceeds from our associates, offset by investment in building improvements. Net cash provided 
by  investment  activities  in  2017  totaling  $1.1  million  reflects  primarily  the  return  of  $3  million  investment  in  300  River  Holdings,  LLC  a  Joint  Venture  Company  held  by  our  wholly-owned
subsidiary Optibase Chicago 300 LLC offset by investment in building improvements. Net cash used for investment activities in 2016 totaling $5 million reflects primarily the additional investment 
in 300 River Holdings, LLC a Joint Venture Company held by our wholly-owned subsidiary Optibase Chicago 300 LLC., and investment in building improvements.

Net cash used for financial activities in 2018 totaling $11.1 million reflects loans and bonds repayment, dividend distribution to non-controlling interests partially. Net cash used for 
financial activities in 2017 totaling $5.4 million reflects loans and bonds repayment, dividend distribution to non-controlling interests partially offset by $5.1 million proceeds from controlling 
shareholders' loan. Net cash used for financial activities in 2016 totaling $9.6 million reflects loans and bonds repayment, dividend distribution to non-controlling interests and proceeds from 
shares capital issuance.

Non-GAAP NOI increased by $87,000, or 0.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in NOI was primarily driven by the 
increase in fixed income from real estate rent and due to decrease in cost of real estate operations, and was offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses. For further details 
regarding the definition of NOI please see Item 4.B.

Non-GAAP Recurrent FFO decreased by $958,000, or 24.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in FFO was mainly due 
to increase in Equity share in losses of associates, related to the investment in 300 River Holdings, LLC and increase in general and administrative expenses offset by increase in fixed income 
from real estate rent and decrease in taxes on income. For further details regarding the definition of Recurrent FFO please see Item 4.B.

During 2018, we invested our available cash solely in various bank deposits and money market funds with various banks. As of the date hereof, we do not have any material contractual 

commitments related to capital expenditure.

In March 2017, our audit committee and board of directors approved, in accordance with the Israeli Companies Regulations (Relieves for Transactions with Interested Parties) of 2000, 
the receipt of a $5.1 million loan, or the Loan, from our Controlling shareholder. The Loan was granted to the Company on March 28, 2017 for the purpose of strengthening the Company's 
liquidity. The Loan does not bear any interest or linkage differentials and is unsecured. In May 2018, the parties entered into an amendment to the Loan's agreement, under which the Company 
reapid the Controlling Shareholder $2.5 million on account of the Loan's account. The repayment by the Company of the remaining Loan's amount of a $2.5 million has been postponed from April 
1, 2019 to April 1, 2020, however, we may prepay the Loan prior to such date at our sole discretion without any penalty.

- 42 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In June 2017, Aberdeen Associates LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or Aberdeen Lender, extended a $7 Million, 5-year fixed-rate loan facility, the Aberdeen Loan Facility, to 
the Company’s subsidiary, Optibase Inc.. As the date hereof, Optibase Inc. has not drawn down any funds under the Aberdeen Loan Facility.  The Aberdeen Loan Facility may be drawn down 
in $250,000 increments, and beginning with the first such draw-down, will bear interest at an annual rate of 5% of the amount drawn, and is compounded and paid quarterly until the maturity on 
June 1, 2022, at which point all outstanding principal and interest will become due and payable. The Aberdeen Loan Facility is secured by a pledge by Optibase Inc. of 100% of its membership 
interest in Optibase Chicago 300, LLC. Prepayments of principal on the Aberdeen Loan Facility are allowed without penalty, on ten (10) days’ prior notice to the Aberdeen Lender.

In November 2017, Shinhan Bank, a Korean Bank, or Shinhan, extended a $175 Million, 5-year fixed-rate loan, the Shinhan Loan, to South Riverside Building LLC, or 300 Riverside Owner, 
an entity in which Optibase owns a thirty percent (30%) beneficial interest. The Shinhan Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 5.50% and is compounded and paid monthly until the Shinhan 
Loan matures in November, 2022, at which point all remaining principal and interest will become due and payable. The Shinhan Loan is secured by 300 South Riverside Plaza, a newly renovated, 
22-story LEED Gold Certified office tower located in the West Loop of Chicago, IL, USA which is owned by 300 Riverside Owner. Optibase Ltd. received a repayment of its senior notes to 300 
Riverside Owner’s parent company, 300 River Holdings LLC, in the amount of USD $3 million plus accrued interest from the proceeds of the Shinhan Loan.

The following table summarizes the principle terms of our material financing agreements of the Company in effect as of December 31, 2018:

Type of 
Facility

Borrower

Original Date 
and Maturity 
Date

Original
Amount*

The
Company

Non-
convertible
Series  A  Bonds 
issued 
the 
public in Israel

to 

Original  Date-
August 9, 2015;
Maturity  Date-
December 
31, 
2021

NIS 60 
million
(app. $15 
million)

Outstanding
Amount (as of 
December 31, 
2018)**

NIS 30 million
(app. $8 
million)

Annual
Interest

6.7%

Principal
Securities

none

Payment Terms

Interest -  payable 
semi-annual
in 
payments

-
Principal
payable  in  semi-
annual  payments 
on  June  30  and 
on  December  31 
the 
of  each  of 
2016 
of 
years 
through 2021 (last 
on 
payment 
December 
31, 
2021)

Principal Covenants

Additional Information

in 

of 

on 

all 

Company's 

no  distributions 

•  negative  pledge  regarding 
the  creation  of  a  floating 
charge 
the 
Company's assets, subject to 
certain exceptions.
•no  distributions 
an 
amount  greater  than  35%  of 
the profits
• 
that 
immediately  following  which 
equity 
the 
(excluding  minority  interest) 
will  decrease  below  $50 
million
•  increase  of  interest  rate  in 
case  of  certain  decreases  in 
the bonds' rating.
•  minimum  equity  (excluding 
minority  interest)  will  not  be 
less than $33 million
•  equity  (including  minority 
to  balance  sheet 
interest) 
ratio  will  not  be  less  than 
25%
•  net  financial  debt  to  CAP 
ratio  will  not  be  greater  than 
70%
•  net 
to 
EBITDA  ratio  will  not  be 
greater than 16.

financial  debt 

The  bonds  are  rated  at  a 
rating  of  "Baa1/Stable"  on  a 
local  scale  by  Midroog  Ltd., 
an affiliate of Moody’s.

Events  of  default  include, 
among  which,  the  existence 
of  a  real  concern  that  the 
Company  will  not  meet  its 
undertakings 
material 
the  bondholders; 
towards 
breach  of 
the  Company's 
financial  covenants  during 
fiscal 
two 
consecutives 
quarters; 
default 
cross 
provisions;  the  sale  of  the 
majority  of  the  Company's 
assets,  subject 
to  certain 
exceptions;  and  occurrence 
of certain 'change of control' 
events.

on 

certain 

restriction 

No 
the 
issuance  of  any  new  series 
of  debt  instruments,  subject 
to 
exceptions. 
Expansion  of  the  series  is 
subject  to  maintaining  the 
rating assigned to the bonds 
prior  to  the  expansion  date 
and  continued  compliance 
with the financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2018, the 
Company  meets 
the 
required covenants.

all 

- 43 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual
Interest

Payment Terms

Principal
Securities

Principal Covenants

Additional Information

Type of 
Facility

Borrower

Original Date 
and Maturity 
Date

Original
Amount*

Refinancing
agreement 
the 
complex

of 
CTN 

OPCTN,
S.A.
(Mezzanine
Borrower)

Original  Date-
October 3, 2011; 
Maturity  Date-
Up  to  7.5  years 
from the original 
date.

CHF 15 
million
(app.
$16.5
million).

Outstanding
Amount (as 
of December 
31, 2018)**

CHF 0.5 
million (app. 
$0.5  million).

+ 
LIBOR 
either: 
(a) 
1.30%; or (b) a 
of 
maximum 
the 
2.50% 
if 
lender's 
risk 
assessment
requires  such 
a change.

due 

Interest 
quarterly,
beginning  March 
31, 2012.

senior  
A 
mortgage  over 
the property + a 
pledge 
of 
Eldista's shares

CHF  2  million  to 
be  paid  per  year 
on 
a  quarterly 
basis,  beginning 
31.12.2011.

in 

• Transfers/sales  of  property 
are prohibited.  Any sale will 
result 
loan  being 
the 
repayable  and  a  prepayment 
fee  of  0.1%,  plus  difference 
between  interest  rate  at  time 
of  termination  and  interest 
rate that bank can achieve for 
residual 
(LIBOR) 
interest 
term.
• Distributions 
of 
dividends/shareholder  loans 
are only permitted in line with 
available  yearly  profit  after 
loan payments.

•Distributions 
of 
dividends/shareholder  loans 
are  only  permitted:  (a)  to 
OPCTN 
loan 
to  make 
payments;  and  (b)  otherwise 
in  line  with  available  yearly 
profit after loan payments.

its 

Eldista
GmbH
(Senior
Borrower)

Original  Date-
October 3, 2011;
Maturity  Date-
2061

CHF 85 
million
(app.
$93.5
million).

CHF 85 million 
(app. $86.3  
million).

LIBOR 
0.75% 
annum.

+ 
per 

due 

Interest 
quarterly,
beginning  March 
31, 2012.

CHF  2  million  to 
be  paid  per  year 
a  quarterly 
on 
basis,  beginning 
31.12.2018.

- 44 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding
Amount (as 
of December 
31, 2018)**

€19 million 
(app. $21.6 
million)

Type of 
Facility

Borrower

Original Date 
and Maturity 
Date

Original
Amount*

Financing
(as 
agreement 
amended) of the 
Edeka Portfolio

Optibase
Bavaria
GmbH 
Co. KG

Original  Date-
2015; 
May 
Maturity  Date-
May 31, 2020

& 

€21
million
(app. $23 
million) of 
which
€20.5
million
(app.
$22.5
million)
has been 
drawn
down

Annual
Interest

Payment Terms

Principal
Securities

Principal Covenants

Additional Information

Quarterly
amortization 
€105,000 
from 
June 
2015  until 
maturity date.

of 
each 
30, 
the 

3  month  Euro 
Interbank
Offer  Rate  + 
either: 
(a) 
1.75%;  or  (b) 
if 
certain 
mortgage
requirements
under  German 
law  are  not 
met, 1.89%.

a 

is 

There 
Hedge
Agreement  in 
place
an 
securing 
interest 
rate 
of  a  maximum 
of  2.15%  per 
annum.

charges 
the 

Land 
over 
Portfolio
properties;

Assignment  of 
rent, 
insurance 
right and claims 
as 
as  well 
claims  of 
all 
future  purchase 
agreements;

Pledge  of  rent 
accounts;

Enforceable
abstract
promise 
debt;

of 

Assignment  of 
right and claims 
under 
the 
Hedge
Agreement.

every 

payment 

•  Debt  service  cover  ratio 
("DSCR")  of  at  least  130% 
(breach  is  a  "Soft  Default", 
requiring 
income 
surplus 
from  the  portfolio  properties 
to  be  used  to  remedy  the 
breach)  or  of  at  least  110% 
(breach  is  a  "Hard  Default" 
requiring 
by 
Borrower to fully remedy the 
breach-  DSCR  of  130%  must 
be  restored).   DSCR  must  be 
proven  towards  the  bank  by 
the  Borrower 
six 
months  from  December  31, 
2015.
• Loan to value of 70% in the 
first  three  years  and  65%  in 
the  fourth  and  fifth  years 
(breach  requires  Borrower  to 
the 
make 
the 
Borrower 
breach).  
was 
valued at approximately €32.4
million  on  December  3,  2014, 
and  new  valuations  may  be 
done  at 
two 
years  (first  on  September  30, 
2016)  at  the  cost  of  the 
Borrower or at any other time 
at the Lender's cost.

payment 
to 
Portfolio 

by 
remedy 

intervals  of 

As of December 31, 2018, the 
Company  meets 
the 
required covenants.

all 

- 45 -

the 

out 

•  The  Borrower  should  pay 
certain  release  amounts  (as 
set 
loan 
in 
agreement)  if  a  mortgaged 
property  is  sold  prior  to  the 
maturity  date.  The  release 
amount  is  the  higher  of  (i) 
re-payment
the  minimum 
amount  agreed  for  the  sold 
property  or  (ii)  75%  of  the 
net  sales  proceeds  received 
for the sold property.
•  Exit  Fee  for  prepayment 
prior  to  Maturity  Date  equal 
to  0.30%  per  remaining  year 
plus 
of 
term 
the 
compensation  for 
loss  of 
interest to the Lender.
•  The  Bank  has  a  claim  for 
damages  in  the  event  of  a 
partial  or  full  prepayment  of 
the loan amount.
• 
If 
the  Borrower  fulfils 
certain 
requirements  with 
the 
respect 
to  expanding 
Lenggries  property  on  or  by 
December  31,  2017,  a  part  of 
the  undrawn 
the 
amount  of  €525,884  will  be 
paid  out  to  the  Borrower.  If 
the conditions are not met on 
or by December 31, 2017 then 
the  loan  will  be  reduced  by 
€525,884  and  Borrower  will 
repay  an  amount  of  €74,116.
To  date,  the  Company  is 
negotiating  with  the  bank 
regarding  an  extension  until 
December 31, 2018.
•The Lender is authorized to 
syndicate or transfer parts or 
the  entire  loan  at  its  own 
cost.

loan 

in 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Type of 
Facility

Borrower

Original Date 
and Maturity 
Date

Original
Amount*

Financing
agreement 
condominium
units in Miami

of 

Optibase
Real  Estate 
Miami, LLC

$9.4
million

Original  Date-
July 7, 2015;
Maturity  Date-
July  8,  2018, 
extended 
to 
July 8, 2020

Outstanding
Amount (as 
of December 
31, 2018)**

$9 million

Annual
Interest

Payment Terms

Principal
Securities

Principal Covenants

Additional Information

to 

sale 

no  Event 

•  The  Mortgage  will  be 
partially  released  so  that  a 
sale  of  a  Unit  can  occur, 
provided: 
of 
Default exists at the time the 
Borrower presents a contract 
for 
the  Lender 
executed by a buyer; the sale 
is  to  a  bona-fide  third  party 
purchaser  upon  the  terms 
and  conditions  set  out  in 
Exhibit  B  of 
the  Loan 
Agreement.
• Lender may obtain a new or 
updated  Appraisal  of 
the 
Project 
Borrower’s
at 
expense  once  annually,  or 
more  often  if  an  Event  of 
Default  exists  or  if  required 
by 
or 
banking agency or authority.

governmental 

a 

Libor  (30-day
rate)  +  either: 
(a)  2.65%;  or 
(b)  3,25% 
if 
Borrower  and 
Guarantor  fail 
to  maintain 
depository
accounts with 
the 
Lender 
totaling  $1.5 
million.

Interest
–
payable   monthly 
commencing  on 
August 1, 2015.
Principal: 
is 
amortized  on  a 
basis 
monthly 
principal 
with 
payments 
of 
approximately
$19,000 per month 
until 
loan 
the 
matures on July 8, 
2020  when 
all 
remaining
principal 
and 
interest  become 
due and payable.

senior 

(i)  A 
mortgage
spread  over  25 
residential
condominium
units;  and  (ii) 
from 
Guaranty 
Inc., 
Optibase, 
which 
under 
Inc. 
Optibase, 
guarantees 
the 
obligations  of 
the  Borrower, 
including 
the 
punctual
payment 
of 
amounts  owed 
under  the  loan 
documents.

at 

least 

• Borrower to keep $1 million 
in a Restricted Account, from 
which  interest  payments  are 
deducted  if  such  payments 
are not paid in cash.
• Guarantor and the Borrower 
must  collectively  maintain 
and 
unrestricted 
unencumbered Liquid Assets 
of 
$2  million 
including  any  amounts  held 
as Interest Reserve under the 
Loan Agreement.
Guarantor  not  to  transfer  a 
material portion of its assets, 
other  than  in  the  ordinary 
course  of  business,  for  fair 
market 
such 
transfer will not have material 
adverse  effect  on  its  ability 
to  perform  its  obligations.  
make 
Guarantor 
advances 
in 
ordinary  course  of  business 
without consent.

to  affiliates 

terms, 

and 

can 

As of December 31, 2018, the 
Company  meets 
the 
required covenants.

all 

- 46 -

 
 
 
 
Type of 
Facility

Borrower

Original Date 
and Maturity 
Date

Original
Amount*

Optibase
RE 1 SARL

Financing
agreement 
of 
the  property  in 
Rumlang

Original  Date-
October  2009; 
Maturity  Date-
2059

CHF 18.8 
million
($18.4
million)

Outstanding
Amount (as 
of December 
31, 2018)**

CHF 15.4 
million (app. 
$15.7 million)

Annual
Interest

Payment Terms

Principal
Securities

Principal Covenants

Additional Information

senior 
A 
mortgage  over 
the property +
Pledge  over  the 
holdings 
in 
borrower.

•  Undertaking  not  to  grant 
any 
or 
encumbrance 
mortgage  on  the  Rümlang 
property without the lender's 
approval.

As of December 31, 2018, the 
Company  meets 
the 
required covenants.

all 

Libor  (for  a 
period
determined by 
borrower  per 
interest 
each 
payment 
for 
next 
the 
payment)  +  
0.8%

Interest -  payable 
in  four  quarterly 
payments
annually;

principal 
is 
in  four 

The 
amount 
payable 
quarterly
amortization
payments
annually,  each  in 
the  amount  of 
CHF 
94,000 
(approximately
$92,000  as  of  the 
purchase date).

•  The  lender  may  adjust  the 
margin  at  its  sole  discretion 
on  account  of  deterioration 
in  Optibase  RE  1's  credit 
standing  or  the  value  of  the 
property.
•  The  principal  payments 
may  be  adjusted  at 
the 
lender's sole discretion if the 
lease  of  major  tenants  is 
terminated 
no 
replacement  tenant  is  found 
within 6 months.
•  Borrower  may  repay  the 
mortgage at any time, subject 
to  a  prior  notice  of  three 
months  with  no 
subject 
penalty.
• The  lender  holds  the  right 
to  accelerate 
loan 
payments,  upon  occurrence 
of certain default conditions.

future 

and 

Loan
Agreement

The
Company

$5.1
million

$2.5 million

date-
Original 
March 
2017 
Maturity  Date-
April  1,  2018, 
and extended to 
April 1, 2019

The loan does 
not  bear  any 
interest 
or 
linkage
differentials

we  may  prepay 
the  loan  prior  to 
the  maturity  date 
at 
sole 
our 
discretion
without 
penalty.

any 

loan 

The 
unsecured

is 

none

for 

our 

and 

approved, 

In  March  2017,  our  audit 
committee  and  board  of 
directors 
in 
accordance  with  the  Israeli 
Companies 
Regulations 
(Relieves  for  Transactions 
with  Interested  Parties)  of 
2000,  the  receipt  of  a  $5.1 
million  loan,  or  the  Loan, 
from 
Controlling 
Shareholder.  The  Loan  was 
granted  to  the  Company  on 
March  28,  2017 
the 
purpose of strengthening the 
Company's 
liquidity.  The 
Loan  does  not  bear  any 
linkage 
or 
interest 
differentials 
is 
unsecured,  and  we  may 
prepay  the  Loan  prior  to 
sole 
such  date  at  our 
discretion  without 
any 
penalty.  In  May  2018,  we 
our 
have 
agreed  with 
Controlling  Shareholder 
to 
repay $2.5 million on account 
of  the  Loan's  account  while 
postponing the repayment of 
the  remaining.  The  revised 
agreement  was  approved  by 
our  audit  committee  and 
board 
in 
accordance  with  the  Israeli 
Regulations 
Companies 
(Relieves  for  Transactions 
with  Interested  Parties)  of 
2000.

directors, 

of 

In November 2017, our subsidiary, Optibase Real Estate Miami, LLC, refinanced 25 residential apartment units in Miami, Florida, with City National Bank of Florida.
Translation of the amounts into US Dollar was made in accordance with the representative rate of exchange of the relevant currency into US Dollar as of the date the loan was taken.

(1)
*
** Translation of the amounts into US Dollar was made in accordance with the representative rate of exchange of the relevant currency into US Dollar as of December 31, 2018.

- 47 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We believe that, considering the use of cash in our ongoing operations, together with the existing sources of liquidity described above, our working capital will be sufficient to meet our 
present requirements and our needs for cash for at least the next 12 months. However, our liquidity and capital requirements are affected by many factors, some of which are based on the normal 
ongoing operations of our businesses and some of which arise from uncertainties related to global economies and the markets that we target for our services. In addition, we routinely review 
potential acquisitions, which may require additional funds than are currently available. Therefore, we would likely seek additional equity or debt financing, although we cannot assure you that 
we would be successful in obtaining such financing on favorable terms or at all.

5.C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Irrelevant.

5.D. TREND INFORMATION

During  2014  and  through  2015  the  U.S.  real  estate  market  has  shown  signs  of  improvement  and  a  consistent  increase  in  assets  prices  as  the  demand  for  investments  increased 
significantly also driven by financial institutions increased willingness to finance new transactions along with low interest rates. Economically, that had been supported by moderate job growth, 
record housing affordability and fewer distressed property sales. During 2016 and 2017, we have witnessed a decrease in demand for high end residential projects in the U.S. market, while the 
demand  for  other  quality  projects  both  in  the  residential  and  the  commercial  markets  kept  stable  and  in  certain  cased  showing  a  moderate  increase.  During  2018  and  to  date  the  high  end 
residential market in the U.S. is showing a significant decrease in demand while other segments remain stable.

In addition, during 2015 and throughout 2016, as Swiss interest rates declined, Swiss real estate prices remained stable in most segments, while other segments were showing signs of 
increase mainly due to the low interest rates and lack of investments alternatives. At the same time, there was no increase in the demand for new rental spaces and the rental market appeared to 
be slowing down further, in particular the demand for prime office space and the price for such real estate properties. Although economic conditions were promising in 2013, stagnating sales, 
depressed income and ongoing structural challenges meant that demand for retail floor space was modest. In addition, the two most highly developed tenant markets, Zurich and Geneva, are still 
exposed to growing oversupply of office space. Despite the above, during 2014 and 2015, market values on direct investments generally continued to rise, mainly due to low interest rates, and 
lack of investment alternatives, but have been stable during 2016, 2017 and throughout 2018. As this was accompanied by moderate demand for rents and stability in rental prices, the overall 
yields on such investments have decreased further. During 2015 throughout 2018 and to date, the Swiss Central Bank has set negative interest rates for CHF deposits. This in-turn pushed 
investors to further invest in the real estate market while looking for investments alternatives to generate positive returns on their investments.

Over the course of 2016, 2017 and 2018, the German real estate market continued its expansion and growth. While the majority of European countries are still suffering from the world 
economic downturn which have started back in 2008, the German economy and its real estate sector have shown significant signs of improvement supported by a decrease in interest rates and 
an increase in availability of financing. In addition, an increasing demand by foreign investors also supported the increase in assets value as well as the gradual devaluation of the Euro against 
the USD which made the German market also appealing for U.S. investors.

Our financial income is affected by changes in the 6-month Libor rate, see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors - Risks Relating to the Economy, Our Financial Condition and Shareholdings” above.

In 2014 and 2016 we were profitable, while in 2015, 2017 and 2018 we operated at a loss. During 2015, we operated at a loss mainly due to acquisition-related costs of $2.4 million related 
to the acquisition of the twenty-seven (27) supermarkets in Bavaria. During 2017 and 2018, we operated at a loss mainly due to equity losses related to the investment in 300 River Holdings, LLC, 
which beneficially owns the rights to a 23-story Class A office building located at 300 South Riverside Plaza in Chicago, IL.

- 48 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or 

expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

5.F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Set forth below are our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2018:

Contractual Obligations

Total

Long-Term Debt*
Capital Lease Obligations
Lease Obligations
Bonds*
Total Contractual Cash Obligations

136,403 
10,777 
284 
7,906 
155,370 

Payments Due by Period
(USD in thousands)

  Less than 1 year 
3,121 
187 
141 
2,667 
6,116 

1- 3 years

3-5 years

37,212 
375 
143 
5,239 
42,969 

4,826 
375 
- 
- 
5,201 

more than 5 
years

91,244 
9,840 
- 
- 
101,084 

* Excluding interest

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

6.A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information with respect to the individuals who are currently our directors and executive officers. All of these individuals are presently serving in the 

respective capacities described below:

Alex Hilman

Amir Philips

Shlomo (Tom) Wyler

Yakir Ben-Naim

Orli Garti Seroussi (1)(2)(3)

Danny Lustiger(1)(3)

Chaim Labenski(1)(2)(3)

Reuwen Schwarz

Age

66

51

67

47

59

51

71

42

Position

Executive Chairman of the board of directors

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc.

Chief Financial Officer

Director

Director

Director

Director

(1) Member of our audit committee, financial statements review committee and nominating committee.
(2) External director.
(3) Member of our compensation committee.

On  December  20,  2018,  our  shareholders  approved  the  re-election  of  Alex  Hilman,  Danny  Lustiger  and  Reuwen  Schwarz  as  directors  of  the  Company.  On  February  14,  2019,  our 
shareholders approved an extension to the Company's engagement with Shlomo (Tom) Wyler as the Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc., our subsidiary, including an adjustment of his 
compensation, and an extension of the Company's engagement with Amir Philips, the Company's Chief Executive Officer.

- 49 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
Alex Hilman serves as Executive Chairman of our board of directors since September 2009. He has joined our board of directors in February 2002. Mr. Hilman is a certified accountant in 
Israel (C.P.A ISR.), and a partner in Hilman & Co., accountancy firm which provides auditing, tax and business consulting services to corporations. Mr. Hilman serves as a board member in other 
companies  in  Israel  and  abroad.  Mr.  Hilman  was  the  president  of  the  Israeli  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants  in  Israel,  served  on  the  board  of  IFAC  (International  Federation  of 
Accountants), and was a member of the Small & Medium Practices committee in IFAC. Mr. Hilman has published professional works on tax and accounting, among them, The Israel Tax Guide. 
Mr. Hilman has also held professional and management positions at the ITA (the Israeli Tax Authorities) and lectured Taxation in Tel Aviv University. Mr. Hilman holds a B.A. in Accountancy 
and Economics from Tel-Aviv University.

Amir Philips serves as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Philips has been serving in this position since June 2011. Prior to this position, Mr. Philips served as our Chief Financial Officer 
from May 2007, and as Vice President Finance of Optibase Inc. from July 2004. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Philips held the position of Group Controller and Financial Manager at Optibase Ltd. 
Before joining Optibase, Mr. Philips was an accountant and auditor at Lotker Stein Toledano and Co., currently a member of BDO Ziv Haft. Mr. Philips is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel. 
He holds an MBA from the Kellogg-Recanati School of Business and a B.B. degree in Accounting and Business Management from the Israeli College of Management.

Shlomo (Tom) Wyler serves as the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Optibase Inc. Until December 19, 2013, Mr. Wyler has served as a president and a member our board of 
directors. Since his investment in us in September 2001 (then through Festin Management Corp.), Mr. Wyler has served in various senior executive positions. His other areas of involvement 
include investment banking, foreign exchange, financial futures and real-estate. In the early 1990s, Mr. Wyler turned his efforts to real estate interests. Mr. Wyler holds a Masters degree in 
Business Economics from the University of Zurich. Mr. Wyler is Reuwen Schwarz' father in law.

Yakir Ben-Naim serves as our Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Ben-Naim has been serving in this position since June 2011. From 2004 until May 2011, Ms. Ben-Naim held the position of 
Corporate Controller and Financial Manager at Optibase Ltd. Before joining Optibase, Ms. Ben-Naim was a controller at V.Box Communications Ltd., and an accountant at Ernst & Young. Ms. 
Ben-Naim is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel and holds a B.A degree in social sciences from Bar Ilan University.

Orli Garti Seroussi joined our board of directors on January 31, 2008 as an external director. Ms. Garti-Seroussi serves as an Independent Business Consultant and as an external 
director of Unet Credit Financial Services Ltd., Apio (Africa) Ltd. and of Gamatronic Ltd. From May 2017, Ms. Garti-Seroussi serves as a director of Meuhedet Healthcare Organization from May 
2016, as a board member in the Israel Electricity Company Ltd. and as a council member of the Public Israeli Broadcast Corporation. During 2012 and 2013, Ms. Garti-Seroussi served as the 
Deputy Director and CFO of the Jerusalem Cinematheque - Israel Film Archive. From August 2001 until June 2011, Ms. Garti-Seroussi served as the General Manager of the Bureau of Municipal 
Corporation in the municipality of Tel-Aviv Jaffa. From June 1999 until July 2001 Ms. Garti-Seroussi served as manager of consulting department in Shif-Hazenfrats & Associations, CPA firm. 
Prior to that, Ms. Garti-Seroussi served as Deputy Director of the Department of Market Regulation in the Israel Securities Authority and as an Auditor in the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Ms. Garti-
Seroussi  holds  an  M.P.A  from  Harvard  University  and  M.B.A  degree  and  a  B.A  degree  in  economics  and  accounting  from  Tel  Aviv  University.  Ms.  Garti-Seroussi  is  a  Certified  Public 
Accountant in Israel.

Danny Lustiger joined our board of directors in October 2009. Mr. Lustiger is the president and Chief Executive Officer of Cupron Scientific Ltd. and has over 22 years of experience in 
various  aspects  of  Hi-Tech  industry  at  senior  positions  together  with  Real  estate  and  infrastructure  industries,  experience  at  senior  position  in  public  companies.  From  2007  until  2009,  Mr. 
Lustiger served as the Chief Financial officer of Shikun & Binui Holdings Ltd. From 1996 and until 2005, Mr. Lustiger served at different managerial positions at Optibase including Chief Financial 
Officer. From 1993 to 1996 Mr. Lustiger held the position of an accountant and auditor at Igal Brightman & Co. (currently Brightman Almagor & Co., a member of Deloitte & Touche Tomatsu 
International). Mr. Lustiger is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel. Mr. Lustiger holds a B.A. degree in Accounting and Economics and an MBA in Finance and International management from 
the Tel-Aviv University.

- 50 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chaim Labenski joined our board of directors in December 2010. From 1977 to 1999, Mr. Labenski held a number of positions at Securities Division of Bank Hapoalim BM, including 
being First Vice president and Head of Foreign Securities and was involved in consulting, securities research, trading and I.P.O coordination with global investment houses. Since 1999 he acts as 
a private investor. Mr. Labenski holds a B.Sc degree in Civil Engineering from Aston University, U.K, a M.Sc degree in Engineering Management from Leeds University and D.B.A degree in 
Business Administration from Manchester Business School.

Reuwen Schwarz joined our board of directors in July 2014. Mr. Schwarz serves as an independent contractor providing services to the Company since November 2013. Since 2012, Mr. 
Schwarz serves as a real estate manager for a private company. From 2008 through 2012 Mr. Schwarz has served as a manager for Centris Capital AG. From 2006 through 2008 Mr. Schwarz has 
served as a banker for Meinl Bank AG, Vienna. Mr. Schwarz holds a Magister (MA) degree from the University of Economic and Business Administration Vienna, Austria. Mr. Schwarz is Mr. 
Wyler's son in law.

6.B. COMPENSATION

The compensation terms for the Company’s directors and officers is derived from their employment and services agreements and comply with our compensation policy for Executive 

Officers and Directors as last approved by the Company’s shareholders on February 14, 2019, or the Compensation Policy.

The table and summary below outline the compensation granted to the five highest compensated directors and officers of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018. The 

compensation detailed in the table below refers to actual compensation granted or paid to the director or officer during the year 2018.

Name and Position of director or officer

Salary or Monthly 
Payment (1)

Value of Social 
Benefits (2)

Bonuses

Value of Equity Based 
Compensation Granted (3) All Other Compensation (4)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

Amir Philips,
Chief Executive Officer (5)

Shlomo (Tom) Wyler,
Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc. (6)

Yakir Ben-Naim,
Chief Financial Officer (7)

Alex Hilman,
Executive Chairman of our board of directors (8)

Reuwen Schwarz,
Director (9)

252

200

120.2

78.1

56.7

70

-

40.9

-

-

-

-

10

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

22.7

11

4.8

-

9.9

Total

344.7

211

175.9

78.1

66.6

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

“Salary” means yearly gross base salary with respect to our Executive Officers (Mr. Philips, Mr. Wyler and Ms. Ben-Naim). “Monthly Payment” means the aggregate gross 
monthly payments with respect to the members of our board of directors (Mr. Hilman and Mr. Schwarz) for the year 2018.

“Social Benefits” include payments to the National Insurance Institute, advanced education funds, managers’ insurance and pension funds; vacation pay; and recuperation 
pay as mandated by Israeli law.

Consists of amounts recognized as share-based compensation (options and restricted shares) expense on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

“All Other Compensation” includes, among other things, car-related expenses (including tax gross-up), telephone, basic health insurance, and holiday presents.

Mr. Philips’ employment terms as our Chief Executive Officer provide that Mr. Philips is entitled to a monthly base gross salary of NIS 75,000 (approximately $20,000). Mr. 
Philipshe is entitled to 24 vacation days, convalescence pay of 10 days and sick days in accordance with market practice and applicable law, monthly remuneration for a study 
fund,  contribution  by  us  to  an  insurance  policy  and  pension  fund,  and  additional  benefits,  including  communication  expenses.  In  addition,  Mr.  Philips  is  entitled  to 
reimbursement of car-related expenses from us (including tax gross-up). Mr. Philips’ employment terms include an advance notice period of 6 months. During such advance 
notice period, Mr. Philips will be entitled to all of the compensation elements, and to the continuation of vesting of any options or restricted shares granted to him. Mr. Philips 
is also entitled to bonus payments in accordance with the Compensation Policy.

- 51 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

For details on Mr. Wyler’s compensation terms as approved by our shareholders on February 14, 2019, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions”, below. In February 14, 2019, 
following the approval by our compensation committee, audit committee and board of directors, our shareholders approved an amendment to Mr. Wyler's compensation terms 
in a manner that Mr. Wyler's annual gross base salary shall be $220,000 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2019.

Ms. Ben-Naim’s employment terms as our Chief Financial Officer provide that Ms. Ben-Naim is entitled to a monthly base gross salary of NIS 36,000 (approximately $10,000). 
Ms. Ben-Naim is further entitled to vacation days, sick days and convalescence pay in accordance with market practice and applicable law, monthly remuneration for a study 
fund,  contribution  by  us  to  an  insurance  policy  and  pension  fund,  and  additional  benefits  including  communication  expenses.  In  addition,  Ms.  Ben-Naim  is  entitled  to 
reimbursement of car-related expenses from us. Ms. Ben-Naim’s employment terms include an advance notice period of three months. During such advance notice period, Ms. 
Ben-Naim  may  be  entitled  to  all  of  the  compensation  elements,  and  to  the  continuation  of  vesting  of  her  options  or  restricted  shares,  if  granted.  In  December  2018,  our 
compensation committee and board of directors approved an amendment to Ms. Ben-Naim's compensation terms in a manner that Ms. Ben-Naim's monthly base gross salary 
will be updated to NIS 37,800 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2019.

The compensation terms of Mr. Hilman as the Executive Chairman of our board of directors were approved by our shareholders on October 19, 2009. For details on Mr. Hilman’s
compensation terms, including options and restricted shares granted to him, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions”, below.

Mr. Reuwen Schwarz entered into a service agreement with us, for the provision of real estate related consulting services to us, our subsidiaries and affiliates. Such agreement, 
including the compensation terms of Mr. Schwarz in consideration for the services under the agreement, were approved by our shareholders on December 19, 2013 and on 
December 29, 2016. For further details see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions”, below.

     In addition, all of our directors and officers are entitled to benefit from coverage under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies and were granted letters of indemnification 

by us. For further details see “Indemnification, exemption and insurance of Directors and Officers”, below.

In accordance with our Compensation Policy (for further information, see Item 6.D. “The Compensation Committee”), each of our directors (including external directors and independent 
directors, but excluding the executive chairman of our board of directors and directors who serve in other roles at the Company) is entitled to a grant of compensation pursuant to the fixed 
amounts permitted to be paid to external directors (depending on our equity level), all in accordance with applicable regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, or the 'External Directors' 
Compensation Regulations, as may be from time to time. This remuneration is paid plus value added tax (as applicable). Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred as part of their service as 
directors. None of the directors have agreements with us that provide for benefits upon termination of service.

As of March 20, 2019, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned 205,065 ordinary shares of the Company (of which 45,840 ordinary shares were held by a trustee for the 

benefit of our directors and executive officers under our 2006 Plan, vested as of March 20, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter). For further information, see Item 6.E. “Share Ownership”.

Indemnification, exemption and insurance of Directors and Officers

The Companies Law permits a company to insure its directors and officers, provide them with indemnification, either in advance or retroactively, and exempt its directors and officers 
from liability resulting from their breach of their duty of care towards the company, all in accordance with the terms and conditions specified under Israeli law. Our articles of association include 
clauses allowing us to provide our directors and officers with insurance, indemnification and to exempt them from liability subject to the terms and conditions set forth by the Companies Law, as 
described below.

In  addition,  the  Israeli  Securities  Law  of  1968,  or  the  Securities  Law,  includes  provisions  to  make  the  enforcement  of  violations  of  the  Securities  Law  and  certain  provisions  of  the 
Companies Law more efficient by the Israel Securities Authority, or the ISA. Under the Securities Law, the ISA is allowed to initiate administrative proceedings against entities and individuals 
with respect to such violations, and to impose various sanctions, including fines, payment of damages to the person or entities harmed as a result of such violations, limitations on the service of 
any individual as director or officer and suspension or cancellation of certain permits granted to the entity. Under the Securities Law, a company is not allowed to indemnify or insure its directors 
and officers in connection with administrative proceedings initiated against them by the ISA, except that a company is allowed to insure and indemnify its directors and officers for any of the 
following: (i) financial liability imposed on any director or officer for payment to persons or entities harmed as a result of any violation for which an administrative proceedings has been initiated; 
(ii) expenses incurred by any director or officer in connection with administrative proceedings, including reasonable litigation fees, and including attorney fees.

- 52 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subject to statutory limitations, our articles of association provide that we may insure the liability of our directors and offices to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law. 
Without  derogating  from  the  aforesaid  we  may  enter  into  a  contract  to  insure  the  liability  of  our  directors  and  officer  for  an  obligation  or  payment  imposed  on  such  director  or  officer  in 
consequence of an act done in his capacity as a director or officer of Optibase, in any of the following cases:

v 

A breach of the duty of care vis-a-vis us or vis-a-vis another person;

v 

A breach of the fiduciary duty vis-a-vis us, provided that the director or officer acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm us;

v 

A monetary obligation imposed on him or her in favor of another person;

v 

Financial liability imposed on him or her for payment to persons or entities harmed as a result of violations in Administrative Proceedings, as detailed in section 52(54)(A)(1)(a) of the 
Israeli Securities Law;

v 

Expenses incurred by him or her in connection with Administrative Proceedings (as defined above) he was involved in, including reasonable litigation fees, and including attorney 
fees; or

v Any other matter in respect of which it is permitted or will be permitted under applicable law to insure the liability of our director or officer.

Our articles of association further provide that we may indemnify our directors and officers, to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law. Without derogating from the aforesaid, 
we may indemnify our directors and officers for liability or expense imposed on them in consequence of an action made by them in the capacity of their position as directors or officers of 
Optibase, as follows:

v 

Any financial liability he or she incurs or imposed on him or her in favor of another person in accordance with a judgment, including a judgment given in a settlement or a judgment 
of an arbitrator, approved by a court.

v 

Reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees, incurred by the director or officer or which he or she was ordered to pay by a court, within the framework of proceedings filed 
against him or her by or on behalf of Optibase, or by a third party, or in a criminal proceeding in which he or she was acquitted, or in a criminal proceeding in which he or she was 
convicted of a felony which does not require a finding of criminal intent.

v 

Reasonable litigation expenses, including legal fees he or she incurs due to an investigation or proceeding conducted against him or her by an authority authorized to conduct such 
an investigation or proceeding, and which was ended without filing an indictment against him or her and without being subject to a financial obligation as a substitute for a criminal 
proceeding, or that was ended without filing an indictment against him, but with the imposition of a financial obligation, as a substitute for a criminal proceeding relating to an 
offence which does not require criminal intent, within the meaning of the relevant terms in the Companies Law.

v 

Financial liability he or she incurs for payment to persons or entities harmed as a result of violations in Administrative Proceedings, as detailed in section 52(54)(A)(1)(a) of the 
Securities Law. For this purpose “Administrative Proceeding” shall mean a proceeding pursuant to Chapters H3 (Imposition of Monetary Sanction by the Israel Securities Authority), 
H4 (Imposition of Administrative Enforcement Means by the Administrative Enforcement Committee) or I1 (Settlement for the Avoidance of Commencing Proceedings or Cessation 
of Proceedings, Conditioned upon Conditions) of the Securities Law, as shall be amended from time to time.

- 53 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
v 

Expenses that he or she incurs in connection with Administrative Proceedings (as defined above) he was involved in, including reasonable litigation fees, and including attorney 
fees.

v 

Any other obligation or expense in respect of which it is permitted or will be permitted under law to indemnify a director or officer of Optibase.

In addition, our articles of association provide that we may give an advance undertaking to indemnify a director and/or an officer in respect of all of the matters above, provided that 
with respect to the first matter above, the undertaking is restricted to events, which in the opinion of our board of directors, are anticipated in light of our actual activity at the time of granting the 
obligation to indemnify and is limited to a sum or measurement determined by our board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances. We may further indemnify an officer therein, save for 
the events subject to any applicable law.

Our articles of association further provide that we may exempt a director in advance and retroactively for all or any of his or her liability for damage in consequence of a breach of the 
duty of care vis-a-vis Optibase, to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Companies Law prohibits a company to exempt any of its directors and 
officers in advance from their liability towards such company for the breach of its duty of care in distribution, as defined in the Companies Law, for such company’s shareholders (including 
distribution of dividend and purchase of such company’s shares by the company or an entity held by it).

The above provisions with regard to insurance, exemption and indemnity are not and shall not limit the Company in any way with regard to its entering into an insurance contract and/or 
with regard to the grant of indemnity and/or exemption in connection with a person who is not an officer of the Company, including employees, contractors or consultants of the Company, all 
subject to any applicable law.

All  of  the  above  shall  apply mutatis  mutandis  in  respect  of  the  grant  of  insurance,  exemption  and/or  indemnification  for  persons  serving  on  behalf  of  the  Company  as  officers  in 

companies controlled by the Company, or in which the Company has an interest.

The Companies Law provides that companies may not give insurance, indemnification (including advance indemnification), or exempt their directors and/or officers from their liability in 

the following events:

v 

a breach of the fiduciary duty, except for a breach of the fiduciary duty vis-à-vis the company with respect to indemnification and insurance if the director or officer acted in good 
faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm the company;

v 

an intentional or reckless breach of the duty of care, except for if such breach was made in negligence;

v 

an act done with the intention of unduly deriving a personal profit; or

v Fine, civil penalty, a financial sanction or penalty imposed on the directors or officers.

We have a directors and officers liability insurance policy, as described below.

On February 14, 2019, following the approval by our compensation committee and board of directors, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Compensation Policy which 
includes clauses allowing us to provide our directors and officers with insurance and indemnification, and to exempt them from liability subject to the terms and conditions set forth by the 
Companies Law; provided however, that insurance policies purchased under the Compensation Policy comply with all of the following conditions:

v 

the maximum coverage amount under each policy shall not exceed the higher of: (i) US $25 million; or (ii) 25% of our shareholders equity (based on our most recent financial 
statements at the time of approval by our compensation committee) per incident and insurance period (for a one-year period) in addition to reasonable litigation expenses;

v 

the maximum yearly premium to be paid by us for each policy shall not exceed 1.5% of the aggregate coverage of such policy;

v 

the purchase of each policy shall be approved by our compensation committee (and, if required by law, by our board of directors) which shall determine that the policy reflects the 
current market conditions, and it shall not materially affect our profitability, assets or liabilities.

- 54 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We currently have an insurance policy for our directors' and officers' liability, including as directors or officers of our subsidiaries, for the period commencing on December 1, 2018 and 
ending on November 31, 2019, as approved by our compensation committee and board of directors. The coverage amounts under such policy and the yearly premium to be paid by us for such 
policy are US $19 million and US $189,840, respectively. The terms of such policy are in accordance with our Compensation Policy.

As approved by our shareholders on December 21, 2017, following the approval by our compensation committee and board of directors, we have undertaken to indemnify all of our 
directors and officers, including Mr. Tom Wyler, the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Optibase Inc., to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law and our articles of association 
and entered into an indemnity letter with each of our directors and executive officers. The aggregate indemnification amount shall not exceed the higher of: (i) 25% of our shareholders’ equity, as 
set forth in our financial statements prior to such payment; or (ii) $20 million. For further details regarding the approval of an amendment to the indemnification letters, see Item 6.A “Directors and 
Senior Management”.

6.C. BOARD PRACTICES

Pursuant to our articles of association, our board of directors is required to consist of three to nine members. Directors are elected at the annual general meeting of our shareholders by a 
vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power represented at such meeting. Each director holds office until the annual general meeting of shareholders following the annual general 
meeting at which the director was elected or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. A director may be re-elected for subsequent terms. At present, our board of directors consists of five 
members, including two external directors appointed in accordance with the Israeli law requirements, as detailed herein. Our articles of association provide that our directors may at any time and 
from time to time, appoint any other person as a director, either to fill in a vacancy or to increase the number of members of our board of directors.

Under the Companies Law, each Israeli public company is required to determine the minimum number of directors with “accounting and financial expertise” that such company believes 
is appropriate in light of the particulars of such company and its activities. A director with “accounting and financial expertise” is a person that, due to education, experience and qualifications, is 
highly skilled and has an understanding of business-accounting issues and financial statements in a manner that enables him/her to understand in depth the company’s financial statements and 
stimulate discussion regarding the manner of presentation of the financial data. Our board of directors resolved on March 30, 2006 and on June 27, 2010 that the minimum number of directors with 
accounting and financial expertise appropriate for us in light of the size of the board of directors and nature and volume of the Company’s operations is one director (such director may serve as 
an external director, see below).

External Directors

Under the Companies Law, Israeli public companies are required to appoint at least two external directors to serve on their board of directors (following Amendment 27 to the Companies 
Law all of such external directors are no longer required to be Israeli residents if a company's shares are listed on a foreign stock exchange, such as our Company). On December 29, 2016, our 
shareholders approved the re-appointment of Mr. Chaim Labenski and Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi as our external directors for an additional three years term commencing on December 31, 2016 and 
January 31, 2017, respectively. In addition, each committee of the board of directors entitled to exercise any powers of the board is required to include at least one external director. The audit 
committee must include all the external directors, see “Committees of the Board of Directors” below.

- 55 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the Companies Law, at least one external director is required to have “accounting and financial expertise” and the other is required to have “professional qualification” or

“accounting and financial expertise”. A director has “professional qualification” if he or she satisfies one of the following:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

the director holds an academic degree in one of these areas: economics, business administration, accounting, law or public administration;

the director holds an academic degree or has other higher education, all in the main business sector of the company or in a relevant area for the board position; or

the director has at least five years’ experience in one or more of the following or an aggregate five years’ experience in at least two or more of these: (a) senior management 
position in a corporation of significant business scope; (b) senior public office or senior position in the public sector; or (c) senior position in the main business sector of the 
company.

(iv)

the evaluation of the professional qualification of a candidate shall be made by our board of directors and our nominating committee.

a director with “accounting and financial expertise” is a person that in light of his or her education, experience and skills has high skills and understanding of business-accounting
issues and financial reports which allow him or her to deeply understand the financial reports of the company and hold a discussion relating to the presentation of financial information. The 
company’s board of directors will take into consideration in determining whether a director has “accounting and financial expertise”, among other things, his or her education, experience and 
knowledge in any of the following:

(i)

(ii)

accounting issues and accounting control issues characteristic to the segment in which the company operates and to companies of the size and complexity of the company;

the functions of the external auditor and the obligations imposed on such auditor;

(iii)

preparation of financial reports and their approval in accordance with the Companies Law and the securities law.

A company whose shares are traded in certain exchanges outside of Israel, including The NASDAQ Global Market, such as our company, is not required to nominate at least one 
external director who has accounting and financial expertise so long as another independent director for audit committee purposes who has such expertise serves on board of directors pursuant 
to the applicable foreign securities laws. In such case, all external directors will have professional qualification.

Under Israeli law, a person may not serve as an external director if he or she is a relative of any of the controlling shareholders or at the date of the person’s appointment or within the 
prior two years the person, or his or her relatives, partners, employers or entities under the person’s control or entities which he or she are subject to their control, have or had any affiliation with 
us, with our controlling shareholder, or its relative or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with us. Under the Companies Law,  “affiliation” includes an employment 
relationship, a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis or control or service as an executive officer, excluding service as a director in anticipation of serving as an 
external director in a company that is about to offer its shares to the public for the first time.

Furthermore, under Israeli law, a person may not serve as an external director if he or she, or his or her relatives, partners, employers or a person or entity he or she is subordinate to 
directly or indirectly, or an entity controlled by the external director has business or professional relations (excluding insignificant relations) with a person or entity whose affiliation with such 
external director is forbidden.

A person may not serve as an external director if that person’s position or other business activities create, or may create, a conflict of interest with the person’s service as an external 
director or may otherwise interfere with the person’s ability to serve as an external director. If at the time any external director is appointed, all members of the board (who are not a controlling 
shareholder or its relative) are the same gender, then the external director to be appointed must be of the other gender.

- 56 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External directors are elected by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, so long as either:

(i)

(ii)

the majority of shares voted for the election includes the majority of the shares of non-controlling shareholders or with no personal interest excluding a personal interest not 
resulting from relation with controlling shareholders, voted at the meeting (votes abstaining shall not be taken into account in counting the shareholders' votes); or

the total number of shares to total amount of shareholders listed in subsection (i) above, who voted against the election of the external director does not exceed two percent 
(2%) of the aggregate voting rights of the company.

The  Companies  Law  provides  for  an  initial  three-year  term  for  an  external  director  which  may  be  extended,  for  two  additional  three-year  terms  subject  to  provision  specified  in  the 
Companies Law. In the case of a company whose shares are traded in certain exchanges outside of Israel, including The Nasdaq Global Market, such as our company, regulations promulgated 
under the Companies Law provide that the service of an external director can be extended to additional three-year terms, if both the audit committee and the board of directors confirm that in light 
of the expertise and contribution of the external director, the extension of such external director's term would be in the interest of the company. Election of external directors requires a special 
majority, as described above and that the period which that person served as an external director together with the reasons for the extension given by the audit committee presented to the 
shareholders prior to such approval. External directors may be removed only by the same special majority required for their election or by a court, and then only if the external directors cease to 
meet the statutory qualifications for their appointment or if they violate their duty of loyalty to the company. In the event the number of external directors is less than two external directors, our 
board of directors is required under the Companies Law to call a shareholders' meeting to appoint a new external director.

External directors may be compensated only in accordance with regulations adopted under the Companies Law.

Our board of directors has a majority of independent directors required pursuant to the NASDAQ Global Market rules.

Independent Directors

Under  the  Companies  Law,  the  majority  of  the  members  of  the  audit  committee  must  be  independent  directors.  In  addition,  the  Companies  Law  includes  a  corporate  governance 
recommendation according to which the majority of the members of the board of directors in a public company that does not have a controlling shareholder should be independent directors, and 
in a company with a controlling shareholder at least third of the board of directors should be independent directors. A public company may classify an external director or an individual serving 
as a director, as an independent director only if (i) the audit committee has determined that he or she is qualified to serve as an external director (with the exception that such director does not 
have to have professional qualifications or accounting and financial expertise in order to serve as an independent director), and (ii) he or she is not serving as a director in the company for more 
than consecutive nine years (only a period of two or more years, in which such person did not serve as a director in the company, shall be deemed to discontinue the nine year sequence).

Committees of the Board of Directors

As of the date of this annual report, we have four committees of the board of directors, which includes our audit committee, our financial statements review committee, our nominating 

committee and our compensation committee, as described below.

- 57 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Audit Committee

The  Companies  Law  requires  public  companies  to  appoint  an  audit  committee.  The  responsibilities  of  the  audit  committee  include,  among  others,  identifying  irregularities  and 
deficiencies in the management of the company’s business and approval of related party transactions as required by law. An audit committee must consist of at least three members, and include 
all of the company’s external directors. In addition, the majority of its members shall be independent directors in accordance with the requirements of The Companies Law.  However, the chairman 
of the board of directors, any director employed by the company or by its controlling shareholder or by any other entity controlled by such controlling shareholder or a director providing, on a 
regular basis, services to the company, to any controlling shareholder or to other entity controlled by such controlling shareholder, or any director whose livelihood relies on any controlling 
shareholder, may not be a member of the audit committee. Any controlling shareholder and any relative of a controlling shareholder may also not be a member of the audit committee. The 
chairman of the audit committee must be an external director, who has not been serving as a chairman of the audit committee for more than nine years. An audit committee recommends approval 
of transactions that are deemed interested party transactions, including directors’ compensation and transactions between a company and its controlling shareholder or transactions between a 
company and another person in which its controlling shareholder has a personal interest. The audit committee must also determine whether a transaction constitute an extraordinary transaction. 
Pursuant to Amendment 22 to the Companies Law, effective as of January 10, 2014, the responsibilities of the audit committee under the Companies Law also include the following matters: (i) to 
ensure  that  a  competitive  procedure  is  conducted  for  related  party  transactions  with  a  controlling  shareholder  (regardless  of  whether  or  not  such  transactions  are  deemed  extraordinary 
transactions),  optionally  based  on  criteria  which  may  be  determined  by  the  audit  committee  annually  in  advance;  and  (ii)  setting  forth  the  approval  process  for  transactions  that  are  'non-
negligible' (i.e. transactions with a controlling shareholder that are classified by the audit committee as non-negligible, even though they are not deemed extraordinary transactions), as well as 
determining which types of transactions would require the approval of the audit committee, optionally based on criteria which may be determined annually in advance by the audit committee. An 
audit  committee  may  not  approve  an  action  or  a  transaction  with  an  officer  or  director,  a  transaction  in  which  an  officer  or  director  has  a  personal  interest,  a  transaction  with  a  controlling 
shareholder and certain other transactions specified in the Companies Law, unless at the time of approval the audit committee meets all the criteria required under the Companies Law.

Subject to the exceptions specified in the Companies Law, any person who is not eligible to serve in the audit committee shall not participate in its meetings.

Legal  quorum  shall  be  constituted  when  the  majority  members  of  the  audit  committee  shall  be  present  at  the  meeting,  provided  that:  (a)  the  majority  of  the  present  members  are 

independent directors; and, (b) at least one of the present members is an external director.

 Under  the  Companies  Law  there  are  restrictions  regarding  engagement  or benefits  with  a person  who  served  as  an  external  director  (or  his  or  her  relative)  for period  of  two  years 

commencing the time when such external director leaves office.

In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and NASDAQ requirements, our audit committee reviews our internal accounting procedures and consults with and reviews the 

services provided by our independent auditors.

The rules of NASDAQ currently applicable to foreign private issuers, such as us, require us to establish an audit committee of at least three members, comprised solely of independent 
directors. All of the members of the audit committee must be able to read and understand basic financial statements, and at least one member must have experience in finance or accounting, 
requisite professional certification in accounting or comparable experience or background. The board has determined that Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi is an audit committee financial expert as defined 
by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC” or “Commission” regulation. The responsibilities of the audit committee under the NASDAQ rules include the selection and 
evaluation of the outside auditors and evaluation of their independence.

The members of our audit committee are Mr. Chaim Labenski, Mr. Danny Lustiger and Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi. These include our two external directors as required under the Companies 

Law, and we believe that all of the members of our audit committee are independent of management, and satisfy the requirements of Companies Law, the SEC’s rules and NASDAQ rules.

- 58 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Financial Statements Review Committee

Our  board  of  directors  appointed  a  financial  statement  review  committee,  which  consists  of  members  with  accounting  and  financial  expertise  or  the  ability  to  read  and  understand 
financial statements, with at least one of the members having “accounting and financial expertise” (as defined above). According to a resolution of our board of directors, the audit committee has 
been assigned the responsibilities and duties of a financial statement review committee, as permitted under relevant regulations promulgated under the Companies Law. From time to time as 
necessary and required to approve our financial statements, the audit committee holds separate meetings, prior to the scheduled meetings of the entire board of directors regarding financial 
statement approval.

The function of a financial statement review committee is to discuss and provide recommendations to its board of directors (including the report of any deficiency found) with respect to 
the following issues: (i) estimations and assessments made in connection with the preparation of financial statements; (ii) internal controls related to the financial statements; (iii) completeness 
and  propriety  of  the  disclosure  in  the  financial  statements;  (iv)  the  accounting  policies  adopted  and  the  accounting  treatments  implemented  in  material  matters  of  the  company;  (v)  value 
evaluations, including the assumptions and assessments on which evaluations are based and the supporting data in the financial statements. Our independent auditors and our internal auditor 
are  invited  to  attend  all  meetings  of  the  audit  committee  when  it  is  acting  in  a  role  of  the  financial  statement  review  committee  or  at  which  matters  concerning  the  financial  statements  are 
discussed.

The financial statement review committee is required to consist at least three members, all of its members must be directors, and the majority of its members are required to be directors 
who meet certain independence requirements of the Companies Law. However, the chairman of the board of directors, any director employed by the company or by its controlling shareholder or 
by any other entity controlled by such controlling shareholder or a director providing, on a regular basis, services to the company, to any controlling shareholder or to other entity controlled by 
such controlling shareholder, or any director whose livelihood relies on any controlling shareholder, may not be a member of the financial statement review committee. In addition, any controlling 
shareholder and any relative of a controlling shareholder may also not be a member of the financial statement review committee. All the committee members are required to give a declaration 
before their appointment, and the chairperson of the committee must be an external director.

Legal quorum shall be constituted when the majority members of the financial statement review committee shall be present at the meeting, provided that: (a) the majority of the present 

members are independent directors; and, (b) at least one of the present members is an external director.

The members of our financial statement review committee are Mr. Chaim Labenski, Mr. Danny Lustiger and Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi. These include our two external directors as required 

under the Companies Law, and we believe that all of the members of our financial statement review committee satisfy with the requirements of the Companies Law.

The Nominating Committee

The function of our nominating committee is described in the approved charter of the committee and includes responsibility for identifying individuals qualified to become a board 
members and recommending director nominees to the board of directors for election at the general meeting of shareholders. The nominating committee is also responsible for developing and 
recommending to the board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company, periodically reviewing such guidelines and recommending any changes thereto.

The members of our nominating committee are Mr. Chaim Labenski, Mr. Danny Lustiger and Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi. We believe that all of the members of our nominating committee are 

independent of management, and satisfy the requirements of the NASDAQ rules.

The Compensation Committee

Under the Companies Law, a public company is required to appoint a compensation committee. The compensation committee must consist of at least three directors, must include all the 
external directors, the majority of its members must be external directors, and its chairman must be an external director. In addition, all members of the compensation committee must meet the 
requirements under the Companies Law for membership in the audit committee, as described above, and all of its members shall be compensated in accordance with section 244 of the Companies 
Law.

- 59 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Under the Companies Law and our compensation committee charter, our compensation committee is responsible, among others, for (i) recommending to the board of directors regarding 
its approval of a compensation policy in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law, and any other compensation policies, incentive-based compensation plans and equity-based
plans; (ii) overseeing the development and implementation of such compensation plans and policies that are appropriate in light of all relevant circumstances and recommending to the board of 
directors regarding any amendments or modifications that the compensation committee deems appropriate; (iii) determining whether to approve transactions concerning the terms of engagement 
and employment of our officers and directors that require compensation committee approval under the Companies Law or our compensation plans and policies; and (iv) taking any further actions 
as the compensation committee is required or allowed to under the Companies Law or the compensation plans and policies.

The members of our compensation committee are Mr. Chaim Labenski, Mr. Danny Lustiger and Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi.

Our current compensation policy, or the Compensation Policy, was approved by our shareholders on February 14, 2019 and is in effect for a period of three years from the date of 
approval. The Compensation Policy does not, by nature, grant any rights to our directors or officers. The Compensation Policy includes both long-term and short-term compensation elements 
and is to be reviewed from time to time by our compensation committee and our board of directors, according to the requirements of the Companies Law.

Our  Compensation  Policy  serves  as  the  basis  for  decisions  concerning  the  financial  terms  of  employment  or  engagement  of  office  holders,  including  exculpation,  insurance, 
indemnification or any monetary payment or obligation of payment with respect to employment or engagement. According to the Companies Law, the compensation policy must be approved (or 
reapproved) not longer than every three years and relate to certain factors, including advancement of the company’s objectives, the company’s business plan and its long-term strategy, and 
creation of appropriate incentives for office holders. It must also consider, among other things, the company’s risk management, size, and nature of its operations. The compensation policy must 
furthermore consider the following additional factors:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

the knowledge, skills, expertise, and accomplishments of the relevant office holder;

the office holder’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with him or her;

the ratio between the terms offered and the average compensation of the other employees of the company, including those employed through manpower companies, and in 
particular the ratio between the average wage and the median salary of such employees;

the impact of disparities in salary upon work relationships in the company;

the possibility of reducing variable compensation at the discretion of the board of directors;

the possibility of setting a limit on the exercise value of non-cash variable equity-based compensation; and

as to severance compensation, the period of service of the office holder, the terms of his or her compensation during such service period, the company’s performance during 
that period of service, the person’s contributions towards the company’s achievement of its goals and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the 
person is leaving the company

The compensation policy must also include the following principles:

•

the linkage between variable compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria; however, in certain circumstances, we may grant up to three monthly salaries 
per year of unmeasurable criteria for an office holder who is not our chief executive officer;

- 60 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•

•

•

the ratio between variable and fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation at the time of the payment (or with respect to variable equity 
compensation that is not paid for in cash, a ceiling for their value on the grant date);

the conditions under which an office holder would be required to repay compensation paid to him or her if it was later shown that the data upon which such compensation was 
based was inaccurate and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements;

the minimum holding or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation with a view to long-term incentives; and

• maximum limits for severance compensation

Internal auditor

The Companies Law requires the board of directors of a public company to appoint an internal auditor pursuant to the audit committee’s proposal. The internal auditor must satisfy 
certain independence requirements as required by the law. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other things, the compliance of the company's conduct with applicable law and 
orderly business procedures. Our internal auditor is Mr. Doron Cohen of Fahn Kanne & Co., a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd.

Employment Agreements

Each of our executive officers entered into a written employment agreement with us that provides, among other things, that such officers be paid a monthly salary and bonuses. Each 
such agreement can be terminated either by us, or by the employee, upon prior notice, which ranges between 30 to 120 days for most of the management team. The employment agreements also 
provide that each executive officer will maintain confidentiality of matters relating to us and will not compete with us during the period of the officer’s employment and for a certain period 
thereafter.

6.D. EMPLOYEES

We currently have 11 employees, including employees in our subsidiaries, all of them employed in our general and administrative, finance and human resources divisions. Out of whom 6 

employees are employed in Israel, 4 are employed in the United States and 1 is employed in Europe. All of our employees are currently employed pursuant to personal employment agreements.

6.E. SHARE OWNERSHIP

As of March 20, 2019, our current directors and executive officers (eight persons) beneficially owned an aggregate of 205,065 ordinary shares of our Company, of which 45,840 ordinary 
shares held by a trustee for the benefit of our directors and executive officers under our 2006 Plan, vested as of March 20, 2019 or within 60 days. All of our directors or executive officers hold 
less than 1% of our shares except for Mr. Wyler who holds, to the Company knowledge, approximately 159,218 ordinary, which is approximately 3.06% of the Company's outstanding shares. See 
Item 7.A. “Major Shareholders” for more information regarding Mr. Wyler's holdings.

Incentive Plans

As of March 20, 2019, we had no outstanding options and/or unvested restricted shares. As of December 31, 2017, and 2018, the number of options reserved for issuance under our 

plans was 511,260 and 571,260, respectively.

As of March 20, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter, an aggregate of 235,790 ordinary shares has been reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, and 2018, the 

number of restricted shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan was 235,790.

The following is a description of our incentive plans currently in effect.

- 61 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1999 Plans

In January 1999, our shareholders approved the adoption of an Israeli option plan, or the 1999 Israeli Plan, and a U.S. option plan, or the 1999 U.S. Plan, collectively the “1999 Plans”
both plans have a joint pool of underlying shares to be granted thereunder. The 1999 Plans were amended from time to time to include different tax tracks. The purpose of the 1999 Plans is to 
attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of our business. In December 1999, our board 
of directors adopted a resolution to amend the 1999 Plans in a manner that as of April 1, 2000, the number of shares made available for grant under the 1999 Plans will be automatically increased 
annually, to equal 5% of our outstanding share capital at the relevant time. In May 2003 we amended our 1999 Israeli Plan to provide for the grant of options to Israeli optionees under the new 
capital gains track provisions of the Israeli Tax Ordinance. Unless specifically changed for a certain grantee, options vest monthly over a period of four years, starting one year after the date of 
grant, subject to the continued employment of the grantee. The exercise price of the options is determined by our board of directors, subject to limitations. Generally, options granted under each 
of the 1999 Plans will have a term of no more than seven years from the date of grant. All options are subject to earlier termination upon termination of the grantee’s employment or other 
relationship with us, generally no less than three months from termination. We may make certain exceptions, from time to time, in the vesting and expiration terms of options granted to certain 
grantees.

2006 Israeli Incentive Compensation Plan

In May 2006, our board of directors approved the adoption of the 2006 Israeli Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2006 Plan, the purpose of which is to secure the benefits arising from 
ownership of share capital by our employees, officers and directors who are expected to contribute to the Company’s future growth and success. The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of options, 
restricted shares and restricted share units in accordance with various Israeli tax tracks. We currently use the 2006 Plan for the grant of restricted shares only. The restricted shares are granted 
for no consideration and with a vesting schedule of two years (50% each year). The restricted shares are granted in accordance with the Israeli capital gains tax track. Termination of employment 
of a grantee for any reason will result in the forfeiture of such grantee’s unvested restricted shares. All restricted shares are subject to earlier termination upon termination of the grantee’s
employment or other relationship with us, generally no less than 90 days from termination. We may make certain exceptions, from time to time, in the vesting and expiration terms of the securities 
granted to certain grantees. In November 2013, our board of directors approved the increase of number of shares under the 2006 Plan in additional 50,000 shares and in August 2014, our board of 
directors approved the increase of number of shares under the 2006 Plan in additional 150,000 shares.

NASDAQ Listing Rules permit foreign private issuers to follow home country practices in regard to certain requirements, including the requirement to obtain shareholder approval in 
connection with the establishment of certain incentive plans. In June and September 2006, we notified NASDAQ that we elected to follow home practices with regard to the adoption of, and the 
amendment to, the 2006 Plan. Accordingly, the adoption of, and the amendments to, the 2006 Plan were not approved by our shareholders.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

7.A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information known to us regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of March 20, 2019 of (i) each person or group 
known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding ordinary shares and (ii) the beneficial ownership of all officers and directors as a group, in each case as reported by such persons:

The Capri Family Foundation (2)
Shareholding of all directors and officers as a group (eight persons)(3)

Name of Beneficial Owner

No. of Ordinary 
Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)

Percentage of 
Ordinary Shares 
Beneficially
Owned

3,796,284 
205,065 

73.03%
3.94%

(1) Number of shares and percentage ownership is based on 5,216,256 ordinary shares outstanding as of March 20, 2019. Such number excludes: (i) 17,895 ordinary shares held by us or for 
our benefit. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to such shares. Shares subject to options that are 
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2019 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purpose of 
computing the percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any 
other person. All information with respect to the beneficial ownership of any principal shareholder has been furnished by such shareholder and, unless otherwise indicated below, we believe 
that  persons  named  in  the  table  have  sole  voting  and  sole  investment  power  with  respect  to  all  the  shares  shown  as  beneficially  owned,  subject  to  community  property  laws,  where 
applicable. The shares beneficially owned by the directors include the ordinary shares owned by their family members to which such directors disclaim beneficial ownership.

- 62 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
                                           
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2) The information is accurate as of March 18, 2015, and based on Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on March 18, 2015, by The Capri Family Foundation. According to 
such Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13D, Capri directly owns 3,796,284 of our ordinary shares. The core activity of Capri is the holding of investments. In addition, the beneficiaries of Capri 
are the children of Mr. Tom Wyler, the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, Optibase Inc.

(3) Includes 159,225 ordinary shares, of which 45,840 ordinary shares held by a trustee for the benefit of our directors and executive officers under our 2006 Plan, which have vested on 
March 20, 2019 or within 60 days thereafter. Other than Shlomo (Tom) Wyler, all of our directors or executive officers hold less than 1% of our shares.

There have been no significant changes that we are aware of in the percentage ownership held by any major shareholder during the past three years.

All of our shares have the same voting rights.

On March 20, 2019, registered holders in the United States hold approximately 54% of our ordinary shares. To the best of our knowledge, except as described above, we are not owned 
or controlled directly or indirectly by any government or by any other corporation. We are not aware of any arrangement, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in 
control of us.

7.B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For a description of the insurance, indemnification and exemption granted to our directors and officers, see Item 6.B. “Compensation” above.

 Each  member  of  our  board  of  directors  is  granted  compensation  pursuant  to  the  fixed  amounts  permitted  to  be  paid  to  external  directors  (depending  on  our  equity  level),  all  in 

accordance with the 'External Directors' Compensation Regulations, as may be from time to time, for his/her service as a director. For additional information see Item 6.B. “Compensation” above.

On October 19, 2009, our shareholders approved the compensation of Mr. Hilman, a director of the Company, who was appointed on September 1, 2009 as Executive Chairman of the 
board of directors. The principal terms of such compensation are as follows: a monthly payment of NIS 20,000 plus applicable value added tax, against the receipt of a tax invoice. The Company 
will also reimburse Mr. Hilman for his reasonable expenses directly incurred by him in the performance of his duties against the production of appropriate receipts. In addition, Mr. Hilman was 
granted on October 19, 2009, 20,000 options which have been exercised into 20,000 ordinary shares NIS 0.65 nominal value each of the Company under the Company's 1999 Israeli Share Option 
Plan. All other terms of the options are as stated in the Company's 1999 Israeli Share Option Plan.

On December 19, 2013, and following the approval by our compensation committee and board of directors, our shareholders approved the grant of our 12,000 restricted shares, in three 
equal consecutive annual grants (commencing on January 1, 2014), to each of Mr. Hilman, the executive chairman of our board of directors, and Mr. Philips, our chief executive officer, or the 
Recipients, under the Company's 2006 Israeli Incentive Compensation Plan. The restricted shares were granted to the Recipients for no consideration, and vest after a two-year period (50% each 
year) from their date of grant, subject to the continued employment or service of the Recipients in the Company.

On May 16, 2016, and following the approval by our audit committee, compensation committee and board of directors, our shareholders approved the compensation terms of Mr. Wyler, 
for his service as Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Optibase Inc. According to the terms approved by our shareholders, Mr. Wyler serves as Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc. and 
is responsible for the implementation of our strategy in North America, recognizing new local opportunities, forming strategic alliances and overseeing the ongoing management of our current 
U.S. real estate portfolio. The yearly gross base salary in consideration for Mr. Wyler's services as Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc. was set at $200,000 for a full time position as well as 
reimbursement of health insurance expenses of up to $24,000 per year, and including reimbursement of reasonable work-related expenses incurred as part of his activities as Chief Executive 
Officer  of  Optibase  Inc.,  of  up  to  $50,000  per  year.  On  February  14,  2019,  following  the  approval  by  our  compensation  committee,  audit  committee  and  board  of  directors,  our  shareholders 
approved an extension for a 3 year term, of our engagement with Mr. Wyler's, including an adjustment to his compensation terms, in a manner that Mr. Wyler's annual gross base salary was set 
at $220,000 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2019.

- 63 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On  December  29,  2016,  and  following  the  approval  by  our  audit  committee  and  board  of  directors,  our  shareholders  approved  an  extension  of  the  service  agreement  between  the 
Company and Mr. Schwarz, currently serves also as a member of our board of directors, for the provision of real estate related consulting services to us, our subsidiaries and affiliates. Mr. 
Schwarz is a relative of the beneficiaries of Capri, our controlling shareholder. According to term of the service agreement with Mr. Schwarz, he will provide us with real estate related consulting 
services, including: (i) searching, introducing and advising us on real estate transactions, (ii) advising and negotiating with banks and financing institutions, (iii) advising us on our financing 
agreements, all as requested by us from time to time and at our sole discretion. Such services will be provided by Mr. Schwarz at the request of the Company. Mr. Schwarz will render such 
services faithfully and diligently for the benefit of the Company, and will devote all necessary time and attention for the performance of the services. Mr. Schwarz will also use his best efforts to 
implement the policies established by us in the performance of such services. In consideration for such services, we will pay Mr. Schwarz a monthly fee of EURO 4,000 (approximately $5,350) plus 
applicable value added tax (if applicable). Mr. Schwarz will also be reimbursed for expenses incurred as part of the services provided by him which shall not exceed EURO 12,000 (approximately 
$16,060) per year. In the event the service agreement with Mr. Schwarz is terminated during a certain month, Mr. Schwarz will be entitled to a pro rata fee based on the number of days that has 
lapsed until the termination date of the service agreement. Mr. Schwarz may either provide the services by himself or through a corporation under his control, provided that the consideration 
under the service agreement remains unchanged. The service agreement with Mr. Schwarz will be in effect retroactively from November 1, 2016 for a period of three years. Each of Mr. Schwarz 
and us may terminate the service agreement by giving a prior written notice of 30 days. During such advance notice period, Mr. Schwarz will be required to continue the provision of the services 
provided by him under the agreement (unless we have instructed him otherwise) and in any event Mr. Schwarz will be entitled to receive the consideration for such period, except for cause.

On December 21, 2017, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our compensation committee, audit committee and board of directors, the following amendment to our 
prospective  undertaking  to  indemnify  our  current  and  future  directors,  including  our  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  including  directors  and  officers  who  are  affiliated  with  our  controlling 
shareholder, and the grant of amended letters of indemnification accordingly: an increase of the aggregate and accumulated indemnification amount that the Company may pay its directors and 
officers, to an amount that shall not exceed the higher of: (i) 25% of the shareholders’ equity of the Company, as set forth in the Company’s most recent consolidated financial statements prior to 
such payment; (ii) 20 million U.S. Dollars.

On May 16, 2016, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our compensation committee and board of directors, certain amendments to the compensation terms of Mr. 
Philips and the grant of special bonus as follows: (a) Mr. Philips' monthly gross base salary was updated to NIS 65,000 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2016 and would increase to NIS 
75,000 as of January 1, 2017; and (b) Mr. Philips was awarded a special bonus in the amount of NIS 120,000. On February 14, 2019, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our 
compensation committee and board of directors, an extension of the engagement with Mr. Philips. As such Mr. Philips’ monthly base gross salary is NIS 75,000 (approximately $20,800), and he is 
entitled to 24 vacation days, convalescence pay of 10 days and sick days in accordance with market practice and applicable law, monthly remuneration for a study fund, contribution by us to an 
insurance policy and pension fund, and additional benefits, including communication expenses. In addition, Mr. Philips is entitled to reimbursement of car-related expenses from us (including tax 
gross-up). Mr. Philips’ employment terms include an advance notice period of 6 months. During such advance notice period, Mr. Philips is entitled to all of the compensation elements, and to the 
continuation of vesting of any options or restricted shares granted to him. Mr. Philips is also entitled to bonus payments in accordance with the Compensation Policy.

- 64 -

 
 
 
 
On December 29, 2016, our shareholders approved the reappointment of Ms. Garti-Seroussi and Mr. Labenski as external directors of the Company for an additional three years term 
commencing on January 31, 2017 and on December 31, 2016, respectively, including the compensation terms for their service as external directors of the Company, in the compensation terms 
specified in Item 6.B. “Compensation” above.

In March 2017, our audit committee and board of directors approved, the receipt of a loan from our Controlling shareholder. The Loan was granted to the Company on March 28, 2017. 

For further details see Item 5.B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.

As part of the purchase by the Company's subsidiary Optibase Inc. of twelve luxury condominium units located in Miami Beach, Florida, or the Acquisition Transaction, on December 
31, 2013, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase Real Estate Miami LLC, a Florida limited liability company, or Optibase Miami, has entered into an agreement with an affiliate of Capri, 
our controlling shareholder, for the lease of a luxury condominium unit (including 2 parking spaces) in the Continuum on South Beach Condominium, located in Miami Beach, Florida, for a term of 
36 months. The rent for the entire period of the lease was prepaid at a rate of $12,000 per month including sales tax (for a total rent of $432,000 including sales tax). The rent was paid at the closing 
date of the Acquisition Transaction in 66,977 ordinary shares of the Company, at a price of $6.45 per share (which offset the number of ordinary shares to be issued by us in the Acquisition 
Transaction).

On December 29, 2016, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our audit committee and board of directors, a new lease agreement to be entered into with an affiliate of 
Capri, or the Tenant. The new lease will be in effect for a one-year term commencing on January 2, 2017, which will be automatically extended by a one-year term and up to a total of three years. 
The Tenant may decide not to extend the New Lease provided that it has given notice to that effect to the Company at least 45 days before the end of each year. The monthly rent to be paid by 
the Tenant to the Company is $25,000, including sales tax, the Rent. The Rent will be increased by 3% every year.

Registration Rights Agreement

On October 22, 2014, our shareholders approved, following the approval by our audit committee and board of directors, the entrance by us into a registration rights agreement with Mr. 
Wyler and Capri, or the Holders, for the filing of a registration statement in order to register for resale all of our ordinary shares of held by them. The following is a short summary of the principal 
terms of the agreement:

Demand registration rights

At any time after nine months following the approval of the agreement by our shareholders, at the request of the holders of at least 5% of the ordinary shares outstanding on the 
effective date of the agreement, we must register any or all of the Holders’ ordinary shares as follows: (i) in the event that we are not eligible under applicable securities laws to file a registration 
statement on Form F-3, we are required to effect up to two such registrations, but only if the minimum anticipated gross aggregate offering price of the shares to be registered exceeds $5 million, 
and (ii) in the event that we are eligible under applicable securities laws to file a registration statement on Form F-3, we are required to effect an unlimited number of registrations, but only (a) if 
the minimum gross anticipated aggregate offering price of the shares to be registered exceeds $5 million, and (b) up to two within a period of twelve months. Such registration must also include 
any additional registrable securities requested to be included in such registration by any other holders who are party to the agreement or entitled thereunder.

- 65 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our obligation to effect a registration is subject to certain qualifications and limitations, including our right to postpone a registration during the period that is 90 days before our good 
faith estimate of the date of filing of, and ending up to 180 days after the effective date of, a registration statement initiated by us and for which the piggyback rights described below will apply, 
our right to postpone a registration for a period of up to 60 days in the event of our furnishing a certificate signed by our Chief Executive Officer that states that in the good faith judgment of our 
board  of  directors,  it  would  be  materially  detrimental  to  us  or  our  shareholders  for  such  registration  statement  to  either  become  effective  or  remain  effective,  because  such  action  would  (i) 
materially interfere with a significant acquisition, corporate reorganization, or other similar transaction involving us or (ii) require premature disclosure of material information that we have a bona 
fide business purpose for preserving as confidential. However, we may not invoke this postponement right for more than an aggregate of 90 days in any 12 month period.

Piggyback registration rights

The Holders have the right to request that we include their registrable securities in any registration statement that we file (other than a registration statement on Form S-8, S-4 or other 
equivalent form). The right of a Holder to include shares in the registration related thereto is conditioned upon the shareholder accepting the terms of the underwriting, if any, as agreed between 
us and the underwriters and then only in such quantity as the underwriters in their sole discretion determine will not jeopardize the success of our offering. However, we have agreed not to grant 
any other shareholders priority to have their securities registered prior the securities of a Holder.

Expenses

All expenses incurred in effecting a registration provided for under the agreement, including, without limitation, all registration and filing fees, printing expenses, reasonable fees and 
disbursements of counsel for us and for one U.S. counsel and one Israeli counsel, underwriting expenses (other than share transfer taxes, selling Holder underwriting discounts or commissions), 
road show expenses, expenses of any audits incident to or required by any such registration, shall be paid by us.

Indemnification

The agreement further includes mutual indemnification obligations between the parties, according to which, subject to applicable law, each party to the agreement shall indemnify and 
hold harmless the other party, from and against any and all losses, claims, expenses, damages or liabilities, joint or several as the same are incurred to which they, or any of them, may become 
subject under the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, other federal or state statutory law or regulation, at common law, or otherwise, insofar as such losses, claims, 
expenses, damages or liabilities (or action in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon any of the events specified in the agreement.

Termination of Registration Rights

The Holders’ right to request registration or to include registrable securities held by them in any registration pursuant to the agreement, shall terminate upon the earlier of (a) seven (7) 
years following the effective date of the agreement or (b) when all of their registrable securities can be sold without restriction pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act and without the 
requirement for us to be in compliance with the current public information requirements under Rule 144 as confirmed by an unqualified opinion by counsel of us.

Commercial Office Building in Philadelphia

On October 12, 2012, following the approval of our audit committee and board of directors, and the approval of our shareholders during an annual general meeting of our shareholders 
held on August 16, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Optibase 2 Penn, LLC, became a limited partner of 2 Penn Philadelphia LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, or the Partnership, which 
acquired an approximately 20% indirect beneficial interest in the owner of a Class A 20-story commercial office building in Philadelphia known as Two Penn Center Plaza, or the 2 Penn Property, 
and entered into the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership, or the 2 Penn LPA. As of December 31, 2018, the Company indirect beneficial interest in the 2 Penn Property is 22.16%.

- 66 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The general partner of the partnership and certain other limited partners of the Partnership, are persons or entities affiliated with Mr. Wyler, the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, 
Optibase Inc., who was then our president and member of our board of directors and considered the controlling shareholder of the Company, as detailed herein. The 2 Penn LPA sets forth the 
terms and conditions of the investment in the Partnership. According to the 2 Penn LPA our subsidiary acquired approximately 26% of the limited partnership interests in the Partnership in 
consideration for approximately $4 million.

The  Partnership  owns  a  beneficial  interest  in  the  owner  of  the  2  Penn  Property  by  being  issued  a  85.76%  partnership  interest  in  Two  Penn  Investor  LP,  a  Pennsylvania  limited 
partnership, or the 2 Penn Investor, which acquired 88% (As of December 31, 2018 - 99%) of the limited partnership interests in Crown Two Penn Center Associates Limited Partnership, or the 
Property Owner, and Two Penn General LLC from Crown Penn Associates, L.P., or Crown Penn. Two Penn General LLC, a Delaware limited liability company controlled by Mr. Alex Schwartz 
acquired a 1% general partner interest in the Property Owner from Two Penn Center GP Corp., a Pennsylvania corporation, or the Existing General Partner, for the aggregate sum of approximately 
$12.8 million.

In connection with the closing of the sale agreement transaction, 2 Penn Investor provided a loan to Crown Penn in the original principal amount of approximately $1.6 million, or the 
Purchaser Loan. The Purchaser Loan will bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum and will mature in slightly more than 3 years and will be secured by a pledge of Crown Penn’s remaining 11% of 
the interests in the Partnership.

The 2 Penn Property has existing mortgage financing of approximately $51.7 million from UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., or UBS. The mortgage loan has a fixed interest rate of 5.61% and 
matures in May 2021, and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $300,000. The acquisition of the partnership interests in the Property Owner from Existing General 
Partner and Crown Penn and the performance of the transactions as a whole were conditioned on UBS consenting to the change in ownership of the Property Owner.

Below is a description of the main provisions of the 2 Penn LPA setting forth the terms and conditions of our subsidiary’s investment in the Partnership:

Purpose of the Partnership

The stated purpose of the Partnership is solely to acquire, own, operate and ultimately sell beneficial interests in the 2 Penn Investor (which directly owns partnership interests in the 

Property Owner) and transact any lawful business that is necessary to accomplish this.

 Capital Contributions

The partners will contribute initial capital contributions to the Partnership in the aggregate amount of approximately $15.5 million (of which our subsidiary's share is approximately $4 
million). The Partnership will contribute the initial capital contribution to 2 Penn Investor which will use the funds to acquire the limited partnership interests in the Property Owner, to provide the 
Purchaser Loan, to pay closing costs for the transaction, and to establish reserves for improvements to the 2 Penn Property.

Additional capital contributions may be requested of limited partners at any time that Two Penn Philadelphia GP LLC (which is the general partner of the Partnership, controlled by Mr. 
Alex Schwartz, who is affiliated with Mr. Wyler as set forth below, or the General Partner) determines that the Partnership requires additional funds. The General Partner may request loans or 
capital contributions from the limited partners, provided that if the General Partner requests loans or capital calls exceeding $2 million during any four-year period it must obtain the approval of 
partners owning at least 65% of the interests in the Partnership.

- 67 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If a limited partner does not provide its capital contributions, the other limited partners will have the option to fund the failed contribution in proportion to their relative percentage 
interests. The portion of the deficiency funded shall be treated as a loan from the lending non-defaulting partners to the defaulting limited partner and shall bear a floating interest rate equal to 
the prime rate of PNC Bank plus 9% (which shall be compounded annually to the extent not paid). The loan shall be repaid directly on a first priority basis out of any subsequent distributions to 
the defaulting limited partner. A limited partner's liability for a default loan shall be limited to its share of future distributions from the Partnership.

Limited Partner Approval Rights

The General Partner has full management authority over the Partnership, subject to certain major decisions which require the approval of partners owning 65% of the interests in the 
Partnership. These decisions include: (a) sale or transfer of any asset of the Partnership or granting approval for the sale of the 2 Penn Property; (b) borrowing money from itself or third parties 
for Partnership purposes or to mortgage, pledge or assign any of the Partnerships assets; (c) requesting capital contributions or borrowing money from the partners in an amount exceeding $2 
million during any four year period; (d) admission of any new partners; (e) removal of the General Partner; (f) termination and dissolution of the Partnership; (g) amendment of the Partnership 
agreement; (h) merger or consolidation into or with another entity; (i) amendment of the Partnership certificate in a material manner; or (j) entering into a new line of business.

Fees Paid to the General Partner

The  General  Partner  or  its  affiliates  may  receive  an  annual  management  fee  of  four  percent  (4%)  of  gross  revenues  from  the  Property  from  the  Property  Owner  in  connection  with 
management of the 2 Penn Property and shall be entitled to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in the management of the Partnership business. The General Partner and its affiliates may not 
receive  any  other  fees  or  payments  from  the  Partnership,  2  Penn  Investor  or  from  the  Property  Owner  without  the  consent  of  limited  partners  owning  at  least  65%  of  the  interests  in  the 
Partnership.

Distributions

All revenue of the Partnership, less the operating expenses and any reserves established by the GP, or Net Cash Flow, will be distributed as follows:

(a) First, to repay partners who loaned sums to other limited partners who defaulted on their capital contributions;
(b) Second, to partners that have made voluntary loans to the Partnership;
(c) Third, to repay the partners their capital contributions; and
(d) Fourth, to the partners in accordance with their percentage interests in the Partnership.

The General Partner has undertaken to cause Two Penn Investor and Crown 2 Penn LLC to distribute all net cash flow received from the 2 Penn Property to their limited partners. Other 
than with the consent of partners holding at least 65% of the interests in the Partnership, Crown 2 Penn LLC may only withhold net cash flow in order to: (1) establish reserves not exceeding one 
million dollars ($1 million) for future expenses of the 2 Penn Property, (2) reserve funds to service debt or loan document obligations of the Property Owner, and (3) avoid the violation of 
applicable laws and avoid the imposition of transfer taxes.

Transfer Restrictions

General Partner Consent to Transfer of the Company’s Percentage Interest: After a three year and one month so long as there has not been a change in the controlling shareholder of the 
Company, our subsidiary shall be permitted to transfer all or part of its interests in the Partnership without obtaining the General Partner's prior consent unless:

(1) the proposed transferee is subject to trade restrictions under US law,
(2) the transfer would violate federal or state securities laws, or
(3) the transfer would violate terms of debt obligations which the Property Owner has incurred.

- 68 -

 
                LP Consent to GP Transfer: The General Partner must receive the consent of partners owning at least sixty five percent (65%) of the interests in the Partnership to transfer the General 
Partner interest. Any transfer of the General Partner must be to a person who or which agrees to serve as a replacement General Partner. So long as the Company is a limited partner, unless 
otherwise consented to by Partners owning at least 65% of the Partnership interests, the General Partner will ensure that, as long as it is controlled by Alex Schwartz (a) at least 20% of the 
percentage interests of the Partnership will at all times be held or controlled by Alex Schwartz and his family members and (b) the general partners of Two Penn Investor and the Property 
Owner shall be solely controlled by Alex Schwartz.

                Right of First Offer: Transfers by partners of their interests in the Partnership are generally subject to a right of first offer in favor of the other partners. The selling party must first offer 
the portion of its percentage interest that it is looking to sell to the General Partner and other limited partners, before selling such portion to a third party. If the other partners do not send the 
selling party a notice of acceptance within the prescribed time or do not agree to purchase all of the percentage interest contained in the offer, the selling party shall have the right to sell such 
percentage interest to a third party.

                Tag Along: If the General Partner or Alex Schwartz receive an offer to sell all or a portion of their percentage interests, after which Alex and his family members or entities under his 
control would collectively own less than 20% of the percentage interests, the other Partners shall have the right to sell to the offering third party the same portion of their percentage interests 
that such third party is willing to purchase from the General Partner and/or Alex Schwartz, on the same terms. If the third party refuses to purchase the other Partners' percentage interests, the 
General Partner and/or Alex Schwartz may not sell.

                Bring Along: If the Partners receive a bona fide offer from a third party to acquire all of the percentage interests of the Partnership and the General Partner and partners holding at least 
65% of the interests in the Partnership agree to accept the offer, then the other limited partners will be obligated to sell their percentage interests on the same terms as the other Partners.

Removal of the General Partner

For as long as Alex Schwartz is controlling the General Partner, a vote by partners holding 65% or more of the interests in the Partnership is necessary to remove the General Partner. If 
the General Partner is no longer controlled by Alex Schwartz, a vote of partners owning at least 51% of the interests in the Partnership is required to remove the General Partner. Appointment of a 
new General Partner requires the consent of 51% of the limited partners. If the General Partner is removed, the replacement General Partner must buy-out the General Partner’s interest at fair 
market value.

Amendment of the LPA

Amendment of the LPA requires approval of limited partners owning at least 65% of the Partnership interests provided that any change affecting a Partner's rights must be approved by 

the affected Partner.

Undertaking Ensuring Limited Partner Rights

Together with the signing of the LPA, Alex Schwartz, the General Partner and the general partner of Two Penn Investor will sign an undertaking according to which they shall (1) not 
permit Two Penn Investor or the Property Owner to take any of the actions set forth in the Section entitled “Limited Partner Approval Rights” above without obtaining the prior written consent 
of  65%  of  the  limited  partners  of  the  Partnership,  and  (2)  not  to  permit  Two  Penn  Investor  or  the  Property  Owner to  withhold  distributions  other  than  as  set  forth  in  the  Section  entitled 
“Distributions” above without the consent of partners owning at least 65% of the interests in the Partnership, and (3) not to permit a change in the ownership of the general partner of the 2 Penn 
Investor or the Property Owner as long as Alex Schwartz controls the General Partner interest.

- 69 -

 
Indemnification

The Partnership will indemnify the General Partner and its members from any claim, judgment or liability and from any loss or expense which may be imposed on the General Partner as a 
result of (i) an act performed by the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership or (ii) the inaction of the General Partner or from (iii) any liabilities arising under federal and state securities laws 
so long as the General Partner acts in good faith in the best interest of the Partnership and the conduct of the General Partner does not constitute gross negligence or willful misconduct.

7.C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8.A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See Item 18 “Financial Statements” for a list of financial statements filed as part of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Legal proceedings

Receipt of a Motion to Approve a Derivative Claim

On October 26, 2014, we received a letter on behalf of two purported shareholders of us, or the Shareholders, demanding us to file a derivative claim against our controlling shareholder 
and our directors and officers, according to procedures of the Companies Law and requesting discovery of our internal documents. The demand alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary 
duties by our directors and officers with respect to the approval of the transaction to acquire luxury condominium units in Miami Beach, Florida, or the Transaction. In accordance with the 
Companies  Law,  we  informed  the  Shareholders  in  December  2014  of  the  way  in  which  we  wish  to  proceed  with  respect  to  the  demand.  At  the  Shareholders’ request,  we  presented  the 
Shareholders with certain materials in connection with the Transaction for their review.

On May 12, 2015 we have been served with a motion to approve the filing of a derivative claim (on behalf of the Company) against our controlling shareholder, directors and CEO and 
against certain former controlling shareholder and directors, or the Motion, and a copy of the derviative claim, or the Claim, which were submitted with the Centeral (Lod) District Court, by two 
purported shareholders of the Company, or the Applicants.

The Claim alleges, among other things, a breach of fiduciary duties by the our directors, officers and controlling shareholder, and an exploitation of a business opportunity by the our 
current and former controlling shareholder with respect to certain private placements of the Company's shares to our controlling shareholder conducted in June 2008, May 2011 and December 
2013. The Claim further alleges, that such private placements constitute a prohibited distribution as the shares were issued for an unfair consideration. As a result of the above, the Applicants 
request the Court to allow them to continue with this derivative claim and ultimately to require all the defendants to pay the Company an aggregate amount of approximately $41.9 million, as well 
as required our shareholder (current and former) to pay us approximately $2.9 million plus interest (for the exploitation of a business opportunity). The Applicants further require reimbursement 
of expenses, legal fees and award to the Applicants.

On November 8, 2015, we have submitted our response to the Motion and Claim together with an expert opinion. We have raised several arguments against the Motion including, inter

alia, preliminary claims to dismiss the Motion in-limine. On November 13, 2015, the directors, CEO and former directors submitted their response to the Motion.

On September 6, 2016, the Applicants submitted to the District Court their answer to our response to the motion to approve the filing of a derivative claim, together with an expert 

opinion.

- 70 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On October 30, 2016, a pre-trial hearing was held during which the Court gave instruction regarding the scope of disclosure that we need to discover.

On March 14, 2017 we, our directors, CEO and former directors’ submitted an expert opinion as a response to the expert opinion submitted by the Applicants.

On May 29, 2017 our controlling shareholder submitted an expert opinion as a response to the expert opinion submitted by the Applicants.

The first cross-examination hearing was held on October 31, 2017, and additional hearings were held on November 19, 2017, December 5, 2017, February 25, 2018, October 7, 2018, 

December 2, 2018 and December 18, 2018.

The summaries submission of the Company is scheduled for March 31, 2019, and of the Applicants is scheduled for April 15, 2019.

At this stage, we cannot provide an assessment as to the chances of the claim and the exposure to the Company.

 Receipt of a Claim in Connection with an Option Agreement

On March 6, 2019, we have notified that Swiss Pro Capital Limited, a company organized under the laws of Switzerland, has filed a legal claim against our subsidiaries, Optibase RE 1 

s.a.r.l and Optibase Real Estate Europe SARL pursuant to which Swiss Pro mainly demands the exercise of a granted option to purchase 20% of the shares of Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l, the owner of 
the Rümlang property, or the Option, in connection with an option agreement between Swiss Pro and our subsidiaries, dated March 1, 2010, or the Agreement (for further details on the 
Agreement see Item 10.C. “Material Contracts”).

Swiss Pro alleges that by calculating the formula under the Agreement, the exercise price of the Option is zero, and as such Swiss Pro claims that it holds 20% of the shares of Optibase 

RE 1 s.a.r.l. as of May 25, 2016, the date on which Swiss Pro has informed our subsidiaries about the exercise of the Option. In addition, Swiss Pro alleges that our subsidiaries be ordered to carry 
out the actions required for the allotment of the exercisable shares, and demands that Optibase Real Estate Europe SARL be ordered to pay Swiss Pro an amount of CHF 450,000 for additional 
charges made since the exercise of the Option and its alleged stake in the cash held by Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l.

The filing of the legal claim was preceded by an exchange of letters between Swiss Pro and us during 2015 and 2016 in connection with Swiss Pro's claim for the exercise of the Option. 
We have responded to the allegations then raised by Swiss Pro and rejected them all (see the disclosure of such exchange of letters in our annual reports on Form 20-F for the years 2015 through 
2017). We maintain our rejection of Swiss Pro's allegations and believe the legal claim to be without merit.

Receipt of a Claim from Tenant in the CTN Complex

On April 16, 2015, our subsidiary Eldista GmbH, filed a claim to the court in Switzerland in an amount of approximately CHF 1 million (app. $1 million) due to damages and unpaid amounts 
from a specific tenant. Shortly thereafter, the tenant filed a counterclaim against Eldista GmbH in an amount of approximately CHF 157,000 (app. $171,200) for damages allegedly caused to it. The 
court suggested the parties to transfer to mediation proceedings which failed. The court handed down a partial judgment on 31, October 2016, dismissing Eldista GmbH's claim (though it had not 
yet examined the issue of the damages). Eldista GmbH filed an appeal against the judgment, but it was dismissed on June 12, 2017. On May 2, 2018, the court ruled that the damages owned to the 
tenant  amount  to  CHF  52,916  plus  interest  5%  as  of  June  4,  2014.  An  appeal  has  been  filed  and  is  currently  pending  before  the  supreme  court.  Should  the  supreme  court  confirm  the  first 
judgment, Eldista GmbH will most likely file a counterclaim against the former real estate agency that was managing the CTN Complex, although there is also a possibility that a judge would 
consider that the latter committed no breach or that only a portion of the damage can be recovered from the agency.

- 71 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At this stage, we cannot assess whether the supreme court will receive or dismiss the appeal.

Receipt of a Claim from Tenant in the CTN Complex

 On March 1 2017, our subsidiary Eldista Gmbh, received a notice from its largest tenant in Switzerland, LEM Switzerland SA, or LEM, regarding the deposit of the monthly rent for 
March 2017 amounting to approximately CHF 279,400 (vat inclusive) with Banque cantonale de Genève under the control of the Pouvoir judiciaire of the Canton of Geneva, as a preliminary 
process for filing a claim with the Commission de Conciliation en Matière de Baux et Loyers of the Canton of Geneva, or the Commission. LEM claims that there are serious defects affecting the 
rented premises, which merit LEM with a reimbursement of approximately CHF 2.4 million (excluding VAT) as well as approximately CHF 69,200 as indemnification for consequential damages for 
the years 2014 and 2015. LEM also reserves its claims regarding damages suffered before year 2014.

On April 5, 2017 LEM withdrew the deposit of the monthly rent for March 2017 with Banque cantonale de Genève under the control of the Pouvoir judiciaire of the Canton of Geneva and 

released the amount to the Company. Thus, paying the full payment of the rent.

Based on LEM’s submissions filed during the first hearing before the court, LEM is requesting a 20% rent reduction amounting to a capital amount of CHF 3,094,000 for the period 
starting from  February 1, 2012, until June 30, 2017, with 5% moratory interest per year starting from October 23, 2017, corresponding to CHF 154,700 per year, based on the various defects 
allegedly affecting the rented premises. In addition, LEM is claiming for related damages an amount of CHF 167,721, subject to amplification, with 5% moratory interest per year starting from 
October 23, 2017, corresponding to CHF 8,386 per year. LEM’s claim for rent reduction was reduced to 10% from July 1, 2017, until repair of the alleged defects or entry into force of the judgment, 
that is to say a capital amount of CHF 285,600 if considered from July 1, 2017, until June 31, 2018. LEM further demands to be reserved the right to claim the reimbursement of overpaid ancillary 
fees. A first hearing took place on June 26, 2018, regarding lease matters, and a second hearing took place on November 7, 2018. The next hearing (personal appearance of the parties and witness 
hearing) is not likely to happen before end of March 2019, and may take place in April or later, depending on the agenda of the court. The Company has sufficient provision to cover the expected 
outcome of this claim.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the past. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future and 

intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the development of our business.

A dividend policy, if adopted, will be determined by our board of directors and will depend, among other factors, upon our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, the impact 
of the distribution of dividends on our financial condition and tax liabilities, and such other conditions as our board of directors may deem relevant. Under Israeli law, an Israeli company may pay 
dividends only out of its retained earnings as determined for statutory purposes. Under our articles of association the distribution of dividends will be made by a resolution of our board of 
directors. See “Description of Share Capital” and “Israeli Taxation”.

Cash  dividends  paid  by  an  Israeli  company  are  normally  subject  to  a  withholding  tax,  except  for  dividends  paid  to  an  Israeli  company  in  which  case  no  tax  is  withheld  unless  the 
dividend is in respect of earnings from an Approved Enterprise. In addition, because we have received certain benefits under Israeli laws relating to Approved Enterprises, the payment of 
dividends  by  us  may  be  subject  to  certain  Israeli  taxes  to  which  we  would  not  otherwise  be  subject.  The  tax-exempt  income  attributable  to  the  Approved  Enterprise  can  be  distributed  to 
shareholders without subjecting us to taxes only upon our complete liquidation. If we decide to distribute cash dividends out of income that has been exempted from tax, the income out of which 
the dividend is distributed will be subject to corporate tax. See “Israeli Taxation”. In the event that cash dividends are declared in the future, such dividends will be paid in NIS or in foreign 
currency subject to any statutory limitations. Under current Israeli regulations, any dividends or other distributions paid in respect of ordinary shares will be freely repatriable in such non-Israeli
currencies at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion, provided that Israeli income tax has been paid on, or withheld from, such payments. Because exchange rates between the 
NIS and the dollar fluctuate continuously, a U.S. shareholder will bear the risks of currency fluctuations during the period between the date such dividend is declared and paid by us in NIS and 
the date conversion is made by such shareholder into U.S. dollars.

- 72 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 8.B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Since the date of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, on March 6, 2019, we have notified that Swiss Pro has filed a legal claim against our subsidiaries, in 

connection with an option agreement. For further details, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings”.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

9.A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS

Our ordinary shares are traded on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol OBAS since our initial public offering on April 7, 1999. In addition, on April 29, 2015, our ordinary 

shares were registered for trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the symbol OBAS.

On March 20, 2019, the reported closing sale price of our ordinary shares on The NASDAQ Global Market was $9.74 per share and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange was NIS 38.48 per 

share.

9.B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Not applicable.

9.C. MARKETS

                Our ordinary shares have been listed on The NASDAQ Global Market since April 7, 1999, under the symbol “OBAS”. On April 2015 we have listed our ordinary shares for trading on the 
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the symbol “OBAS”.

9.D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

                Not applicable.

9.E. DILUTION

                Not applicable.

9.F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE

                Not applicable.

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10.A. SHARE CAPITAL

Not applicable.

10.B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Purposes and Objects of the Company

We are a public company registered under the Companies Law as Optibase Ltd., registration number 52-003707-8.

- 73 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant  to  our  articles  of  association,  our  objectives  are  to  engage  in  any  lawful  business  and  our  purpose  is  to  act  pursuant  to  business  considerations  to  make  profits.  A 

consideration to the Company's purpose and objectives can be found in Chapter 1 to the Company's articles of association.

Our  articles  of  association  also  state  that  we  may  contribute  a  reasonable  amount  for  an  appropriate  cause,  even  if  the  contribution  is  not  within  the  framework  of  our  business 

considerations.

The Powers of the Directors

The power of our directors to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which the director is interested is limited by the relevant provisions of the Companies Law. In addition, the 
power of our directors to vote on compensation to themselves or any members of their body is limited in that such decision requires the approval of the compensation committee, the board of 
directors and the shareholders at a general meeting, see “Approval of Certain Transactions” below.

Under Israeli law each director must act with an independent and sole discretion. Director who does not act this way is in breach of his fiduciary duties.

The powers of our directors to borrow are not limited, except in the same manner as any other transaction by the Company.

Rights Attached to Shares

Our registered share capital is NIS 3,900,000 divided into a single class of 6,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.65 per share, of which 5,216,256 ordinary shares were issued and 

outstanding as of March 20, 2019. All outstanding ordinary shares are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. The rights attached to the Ordinary Shares are as follows:

Dividend rights

Holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to the full amount of any cash or share dividend subsequently declared. The board of directors may propose a dividend only out of profits, in 

accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law. Declaration of a dividend requires the approval of our board of directors. Please see Item 10.E. “Taxation” below.

One year after a dividend has been declared and is still unclaimed, the board of directors is entitled to invest or utilize the unclaimed amount of dividend in any manner to our benefit 

until it is claimed. We are not obligated to pay interest or linkage differentials on an unclaimed dividend.

Voting rights

Holders of ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Such voting rights may be affected by the grant of any special 
voting rights to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future. Currently there are no shares of capital stock outstanding with special voting rights. 
The quorum required for an ordinary meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person or by proxy who hold or represent, in the aggregate, at least thirty three and 
one third percent (33.3%) of our voting rights. In the event that a quorum is not present within half an hour of the scheduled time, the shareholders' meeting will be adjourned to the same day of 
the following week, at the same time and place, or such time and place as the board of directors may determine by a notice to the shareholders. If at such adjourned meeting a quorum is not 
present at the time of opening of such meeting, two shareholders, at least, present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum.

An  ordinary  resolution,  such  as  a  resolution  for  the  election  of  directors,  or  the  appointment  of  auditors,  requires  the  approval  by  the  holders  of  a  majority  of  the  voting  rights 
represented  at  the  meeting,  in  person,  by  proxy  or  through  a  voting  instrument  and  voting  thereon.  Under  our  articles  of  association,  if  a  resolution  to  amend  the  articles  of  association  is 
recommended by our board of directors, such recommended resolution’s adoption in a general meeting of the shareholders requires an ordinary majority. In any other case, such a resolution 
requires approval of a special majority of more than three quarters of the votes of the shareholders entitled to vote themselves, by proxy or through a voting instrument.

- 74 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The directors (who are not external directors) are appointed by decision of an ordinary majority at a general meeting. The directors have the right at any time, in a resolution approved by 
at least a majority of our directors, to appoint any person as a director, subject to the maximum number of directors specified in our articles of association, to fill in a place which has randomly 
been vacated, or as an addition to the board of directors. Any such director so appointed shall hold office until the next annual general meeting and may be reelected.

Under our articles of association our directors (who are not external directors) are elected by an ordinary majority of the shareholders at each duly convened annual meeting, and they 
serve until the next annual meeting, provided that external directors shall be elected in accordance with the Companies Law. In each annual meeting the directors that were elected at the previous 
annual meeting are deemed to have resigned from their office. A resigning director may be reelected.

Under the NASDAQ corporate governance rules, foreign private issuers are exempt from many of the requirements if they instead elect to be exempted from such requirements, provided 

they are not prohibited by home country practices and disclose where they have elected to do so.

Rights in the Company’s profits

All of our ordinary shares have the rights to share in our profits distributed as a dividend and any other permitted distribution.

Rights in the event of liquidation

All of our ordinary shares confer equal rights among them with respect to amounts distributed to shareholders in the event of liquidation.

Changing Rights Attached to Shares

According to our articles of association, our share capital may be divided into different classes of shares or the rights of such shares may be altered by an ordinary majority resolution 
passed by the general meetings of the holders of each class of shares separately, or after obtaining the written consent of the holders of all of the classes of shares. As of the date hereof, we 
only have one class of shares.

Annual and Extraordinary Meetings

Our board of directors must convene an annual meeting of shareholders every year by no later than the end of fifteen months from the last annual meeting. Notice of at least twenty-one
days prior to the date of the meeting is required. An extraordinary meeting may be convened by the board of directors, as it decides or upon a demand of any two directors or 25% of the 
directors, whichever is lower, or by one or more shareholders holding in the aggregate at least 5% of the voting rights in the Company. Where the board of directors is requisitioned to call a 
special meeting, it shall do so within twenty-one days, for a date that shall not be later than thirty-five days from the date on which the notice of the special meeting is published. Notice of a 
general meeting shall be given to all shareholders entitled to attend and vote at such meeting. No separate notice is to be given to registered shareholders of the Company. Notices may be 
provided by the Company in person, in mail, transmission by fax or in electronic form. A notice to a shareholder may alternatively be served, as general notice to all shareholders, in accordance 
with the rules and regulations of any applicable securities authority with jurisdiction over the Company or in accordance with the rules of any stock market upon which the Company's shares are 
traded.

- 75 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Limitations on the Rights to Own Securities in the U.S.

Our memorandum and articles of association do not restrict in any way the ownership of our shares by non-residents of Israel, and neither the memorandum and articles of association 
nor Israeli law restricts the voting rights of non-residents of Israel, except that under Israeli law, any transfer or issue of shares of a company to a resident of an enemy state of Israel is prohibited 
and shall have no effect, unless authorized by the Israeli Minister of Finance.

Limitations on Change in Control and Disclosure Duties

Our memorandum and articles of association do not restrict the change of control nor do they impose any disclosure duties beyond the requirements set out in Israeli law. For restriction 

of change of control provision under Israeli law, see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors”, under the heading “Risks Relating to Operations in Israel – Anti-takeover Provisions” above.

Changes in Our Capital

Changes in our capital are subject to the approval of the shareholders at a general meeting by an ordinary majority of shareholders participating and voting in the general meeting.

Fiduciary Duty and Duty of Care of Directors and Officers

The  Companies  Law  codifies  the  duties  directors  and  officers  owe  to  a  company.  An  “Officer” includes  a  company’s  general  manager,  general  business  manager,  executive  vice 
president,  vice  president,  any  other  person  assuming  the  responsibilities  of  any  of  the  foregoing  positions  without  regard  to  such  person’s  title  and  other  directors  or  managers  directly 
subordinate to the general manager. The directors’ and officers’ principal duties to the company are a duty of care and a fiduciary duty to act in good faith for the company’s benefit which 
include:

v 

v 

v 

the avoidance of any conflict of interest between the director’s or officer’s position with the company and any other position he or she fulfills or with his or her personal affairs;

the avoidance of any act in competition with the company’s business;

the avoidance of exploiting any of the company’s business opportunities in order to gain a personal advantage for himself or for others; and

v  the disclosure to the company of any information and documentation relating to the company’s affairs obtained by the director or officer due to his or her position with the 

company.

The Companies Law requires that directors, officers or a controlling shareholder of a public company disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have, including 
all related material facts or documents in connection with any existing or proposed transaction by the company. The disclosure must be made without delay and no later than the first board of 
directors meeting at which the transaction is first discussed.

Approval of Certain Transactions

Generally,  under  the  Companies  Law,  engagement  terms  of  directors,  including  the  grant  of  an  exemption  from  liability,  purchase  of  directors’ and  officers’ insurance,  or  grant  of 
indemnification (whether prospective or retroactive) and engagement terms of such director with a company in other positions require the approval of the audit committee, the board of directors 
and the shareholders of the company. In addition, transactions between a public company and its director or officer, or a transaction between such company and other person in which such 
director or officer has a personal interest must be approved by such company’s board of directors, and if such transaction is considered an extraordinary transaction (as defined below) it must 
receive the approval of such company’s audit committee as well. The determination whether such transaction is considered extraordinary or not is required to be made by audit committee.

- 76 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Companies Law also requires that any extraordinary transaction between a public company and its controlling shareholder or an extraordinary transaction between such company 
and other person in which such company’s controlling shareholder has a personal interest must be approved by the audit committee, the board of directors and the shareholders of the company 
by an ordinary majority, provided that (i) such majority vote at the shareholders meeting shall include a majority of the total votes of shareholders having no personal interest in the transaction, 
participating at the voting (excluding abstaining votes); or (ii) the total number of votes of shareholders mentioned in clause (i) above who voted against such transaction does not exceed two 
percent (2%) of the total voting rights in the company. An “extraordinary transaction” is defined in the Companies Law as any of the following: (i) a transaction not in the ordinary course of 
business;  (ii)  a  transaction  that  is  not  on  market  terms;  or  (iii)  a  transaction  that  is  likely  to  have  a  material  impact  on  the  company’s  profitability,  assets  or  liability.  Such  an  extraordinary 
transaction which shall last for a period exceeding three years shall be approved again by such company’s audit committee, board of directors and general meeting of shareholders by the special 
majority described above once in every three years.

The Companies Law further provides that the engagement terms of a controlling shareholder or its relative (including by an entity controlled by such controlling shareholder or its 
relative) with the company, either as an officer or an employee, must also be approved by such company’s compensation committee, board of directors and general meeting by the special 
majority described above. Such an engagement which shall last for a period exceeding three years shall be approved again by such company’s audit committee, board of directors and general 
meeting by the special majority described above once in every three years. However, an engagement described in the beginning of this paragraph only which may be approved for a period 
exceeding three years, provided that the audit committee approved the engagement term to be reasonable under the circumstances.

The  Companies  Law  prohibits  any  person  who  has  a  personal  interest  in  a  matter  to  participate  in  the  discussion  and  voting  pertaining  to  such  matter  in  the  company’s board of 
directors or audit committee except for in circumstances when the majority of the board of directors’ (or the audit committee – as the case may be) has a personal interest in the matter. In case the 
majority  has  a  personal  interest  in  such  matter  then  such  matter  must  also  be  approved  by  the  company’s  shareholders.  An  officer  who  has  a  personal  interest  may  be  present  for  the 
presentation of the transaction if the chairman of the audit committee or the chairman of the board of directors as the case may be, determined that such officer’s presence is required for the 
presentation of the said transaction.

Compensation of Officers and Directors

Pursuant to the Companies Law, Israeli Public Companies are required to establish a compensation committee and adopt a compensation policy regarding the compensation and terms of 
employment of their directors and officers. For information on the composition, roles and objectives of the compensation committee pursuant to the Companies Law and our compensation 
committee charter, see Item 6.C. “Board Practices – Committees of the Board of Directors – The Compensation Committee”.

The compensation policy must be approved by the company's board of directors after reviewing the recommendations of the compensation committee. The compensation policy also 
requires the approval of the general meeting of the shareholders, which approval must satisfy one of the following (which we refer to hereinafter as the Majority Requirement): (i) the majority 
should include at least a majority of the shares of the voting shareholders who are non-controlling shareholders or do not have a personal interest in the approval of the compensation policy (in 
counting the total votes of such shareholders, abstentions shall not be taken into account) or (ii) the total number of votes against the proposal among the shareholders mentioned in paragraph 
(i)  does  not  exceed  two  percent  of  the  aggregate  voting  power  in  the  company.  Under  certain  circumstances  and  subject  to  certain  exceptions,  the  board  of  directors  may  approve  the 
compensation  policy  despite  the  objection  of  the  shareholders,  provided  that  the  compensation  committee  and  the  board  of  directors  determines  that  it  is  for  the  benefit  of  the  company, 
following an additional discussion and based on detailed arguments. The Companies Law provides that the compensation policy must be re-approved every three years, in the manner described 
above.  Moreover,  the  board  of  directors  is  responsible  for  reviewing  from  time  to  time  the  compensation  policy  and  deciding  whether  or  not  there  are  any  circumstances  that  require  an 
adjustment to the company's compensation policy.

Pursuant to the Companies Law any transaction with an executive office (except directors and the CEO of the company) with respect to such officer's compensation arrangements and 
terms of engagement, requires the approval of the compensation committee and the board of directors. Transactions between Israeli Public Companies and their chief executive officer, with 
respect to his or her compensation arrangement and terms of engagement, require the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholder's meeting, provided 
that the approval of the shareholders' meeting must satisfy the Majority Requirement. Notwithstanding the above, the compensation committee and the board of directors may, under special 
circumstances, approve such transaction with the CEO even if the shareholders' meeting objected to its approval. With respect to transactions relating to the compensation arrangement and 
terms of engagements of directors in public companies (including companies that have issued only debentures to the public), the Companies Law provides that such transaction shall be subject 
to the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholders' meeting.

- 77 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Such  transactions  for  the  approval  of  compensation  arrangements  with  officers  and  directors  of  Israeli  Public  Companies  must  be  consistent  with  the  provisions  of  the  company's 
compensation  policy,  provided  that  the  compensation  committee  and  the  board  of  directors  may,  under  special  circumstances,  approve  such  transaction  that  is  not  in  accordance  with  the 
company's compensation policy, if the conditions under the Companies Law are met and the company's shareholders approved the transaction in the Majority Requirement. Notwithstanding the 
above, with respect to the approval of compensation terms of an executive officer (except directors and the CEO of the company), the compensation committee and the board of directors may, 
under special circumstances, approve such transaction even if the shareholders' meeting objected to its approval, provided that (i) both the compensation committee and the board of directors 
re-discussed the transactions and decided to approve it despite the shareholder's objection, based on detailed arguments, and (ii) the company is not a Public Pyramid Held Company. Non 
material amendments of transactions relating to the compensation arrangement or terms of engagement of executive officer (including the CEO), require only the approval of the compensation 
committee.

On February 14, 2019, and following the approval by our compensation committee and our board of directors, our shareholders approved a new compensation policy and such policy is 

in affect for a 3-year term.

On January 11, 2013, the SEC approved the amended NASDAQ listing standards on compensation committees and advisers. Among others, the amended NASDAQ listing standards 
include  provisions  relating  to  the  establishment  of  a  compensation  committee,  the  compensation  committee  charter,  compensation  committee  members'  independence  requirements,  and 
arrangements relating to advisers retained by the compensation committee. Under the amended rules, the compensation committee adviser and compensation committee authority requirements 
become effective on July 1, 2013. However, NASDAQ listed companies will have, until their first annual meeting after January 15, 2014, or, if earlier, October 31, 2014, to comply with other 
standards, including the compensation committee member independence standards and the requirement to have a compensation committee and charter (including any charter amendment to 
reflect the compensation committee authority requirements). NASDAQ listed companies must certify compliance with the listing standards within 30 days after the applicable implementation 
deadline. In addition, under the amended rules, foreign private issuers are exempt from compliance with the amended listing standards if home country practice is followed and the listed company 
discloses with the SEC the reasons why it does not have an independent compensation committee. Our compensation committee charter was updated in accordance with said amendments.

Anti-Takeover Provisions; Mergers and Acquisitions

     Special Tender Offer. The Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares of an Israeli public company must be made by means of a special tender offer if, as a result of the 
acquisition, the purchaser would become a holder of at least 25% of the voting rights in the company. This rule does not apply if there is already another holder of at least 25% of the voting 
rights in the company. Similarly, the Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of the acquisition, the 
purchaser would become a holder of more than 45% of the voting rights in the company and no other shareholder of the company holds more than 45% of the voting rights in the company. 
These requirements do not apply if the acquisition (i) occurs in the context of a private placement by the company that received shareholder approval, (ii) was from a shareholder holding at least 
25% of the voting rights in the company and resulted in the acquirer becoming a holder of at least 25% of the voting rights in the company, or (iii) was from a holder of more than 45% of the 
voting rights in the company and resulted in the acquirer becoming a holder of more than 45% of the voting rights in the company. The special tender offer may be consummated only if (a) at 
least 5% of the voting power attached to the company’s outstanding shares will be acquired by the offeror and (b) the number of shares tendered in the offer exceeds the number of shares 
whose holders objected to the offer.

- 78 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
     In the event that a special tender offer is made, a company’s board of directors is required to express its opinion on the advisability of the offer or shall abstain from expressing any 
opinion if it is unable to do so, provided that it gives the reasons for its abstention. An executive officer in a target company who, in his or her capacity as an executive officer, performs an action 
the purpose of which is to cause the failure of an existing or foreseeable special tender offer or is to impair the chances of its acceptance, is liable to the potential purchaser and shareholders for 
damages, unless such executive officer acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to believe he or she was acting for the benefit of the company. However, executive officer of the target 
company may negotiate with the potential purchaser in order to improve the terms of the special tender offer, and may further negotiate with third parties in order to obtain a competing offer.

     A special tender offer may not be consummated unless a majority of the shareholders who announced their stand on such offer have accepted it (in counting the total votes of such 
shareholders, shares held by the controlling shareholder, shareholders who have personal interest in the offer, or shareholder who own 25% or more of the voting rights in the company, shall not 
be taken into account). If a special tender offer was accepted by a majority of the shareholders who announced their stand on such offer, then shareholders who did not announce their stand or 
who had objected to the offer may accept the offer within four days of the last day set for the acceptance of the offer.

     In the event that a special tender offer is accepted, the purchaser or any person or entity controlling it at the time of the offer or under common control with the purchaser or such 
controlling person or entity shall refrain from making a subsequent tender offer for the purchase of shares of the target company and cannot execute a merger with the target company for a 
period of one year from the date of the offer, unless the purchaser or such person or entity undertook to effect such an offer or merger in the initial special tender offer.

     Full Tender Offer. A person wishing to acquire shares or a class of shares of an Israeli public company and who would, as a result, hold over 90% of the target company’s issued and 
outstanding share capital or that certain class of shares is required by the Companies Law to make a tender offer to all of the company’s shareholders for the purchase of all of the issued and 
outstanding shares of the company or class of shares. If either (i) the shareholders who do not accept the offer hold less than 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or 
of the applicable class, and more than half of the shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the offer accept the offer, or (ii) the shareholder who do not accept the offer hold less than 
2% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class, then all of the shares that the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to the acquirer by 
operation of law. However, a shareholder that had its shares so transferred, whether it accepted the tender offer or not, may, within six months from the date of acceptance of the tender offer, 
petition the court to determine that tender offer was for less than fair value and that the fair value should be paid as determined by the court. If the shareholders who did not accept the tender 
offer hold at least 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class of shares, the acquirer may not acquire shares of the company that will increase its 
holdings to more than 90% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital or of the applicable class from shareholders who accepted the tender offer.

     Merger. The Companies Law permits merger transactions if approved by each party’s board of directors and, unless certain requirements described under the Companies Law are met, a 

majority of each party’s shares voted on the proposed merger at a shareholders’ meeting called with at least 35 days’ prior notice.

     For purposes of the shareholder vote, unless a court rules otherwise, the merger will not be deemed approved if a majority of the shares represented at the shareholders meeting that are 
held by parties other than the other party to the merger, or by any person who holds 25% or more of the outstanding shares or the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors of the other party, 
vote against the merger. If the transaction would have been approved but for the separate approval of each class or the exclusion of the votes of certain shareholders as provided above, a court 
may still approve the merger upon the request of holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of a company if the court holds that the merger is fair and reasonable, taking into account the value 
of the parties to the merger and the consideration offered to the shareholders.

     Upon the request of a creditor of either party to the proposed merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that, as a result of 

the merger, the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the parties to the merger, and may further give instructions to secure the rights of creditors.

- 79 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     In addition, a merger may not be completed unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a proposal for approval of the merger was filed by each party with the Israeli Registrar 

of Companies and 30 days have passed from the date the merger was approved by the shareholders of each of the merging companies.

     Anti-Takeover Measures Under Israeli Law. The Companies Law allows us to create and issue shares having rights different from those attached to our ordinary shares, including 
shares providing certain preferred rights, distributions or other matters and shares having preemptive rights. As of the date of this annual report, we do not have any authorized or issued shares 
other than our ordinary shares. In the future, if we do create and issue a class of shares other than ordinary shares, such class of shares, depending on the specific rights that may be attached to 
them, may delay or prevent a takeover or otherwise prevent our shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their ordinary shares. The authorization of a new class of 
shares will require an amendment to our articles of association which requires the prior approval of the holders of a majority of our ordinary shares at a general meeting.

     Tax Law. Israeli tax law treats some acquisitions, such as a stock-for-stock swap between an Israeli company and a foreign company, less favorably than U.S. tax law. For example, Israeli 

tax law may subject a shareholder who exchanges his ordinary shares for shares in a foreign corporation to immediate taxation. Please see Item 10E. “Taxation”.

     The Centralization Law. The Israeli parliament (the Knesset) approved the new Promotion of Competition and Reduction of Centralization Law, 5774-2013, or the Centralization Law, 
which, among others, imposes new constraints and stricter corporate governance rules on pyramid conglomerates, and forces separation between equity holdings in significant non-financial
corporate businesses and equity holdings in significant financial businesses. The Centralization Law has entered into force on December 11, 2013.

10.C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Swiss Pro Capital Limited

On  March  1,  2010,  the  Company’s  subsidiary  in  Luxembourg  Optibase  RE  1  SARL  or  Optibase  RE  1  entered  into  an  Option  Agreement,  or  the  Option  Agreement,  with  a  Cypriot 
company, Swiss Pro, with respect to a commercial building acquired by the Company in October, 2009 in Rümlang, Switzerland. Through its beneficial owner, Swiss Pro introduced Optibase to 
the Rümlang property and facilitated Optibase’s acquisition and financing of the property. Under the Option Agreement, Optibase RE 1 granted Swiss Pro an option to purchase twenty percent 
(20%)  of  the  share  capital  of  Optibase  RE  1.  Swiss  Pro  undertook  to  pay  a  purchase  price  for  the  option  of  CHF  315,000  for  the  option.  The  exercise  price  under  the  Option  Agreement  is 
calculated based on twenty percent (20%) Optibase’s acquisition costs for the Rümlang Property plus interest and an adjustment for proceeds that are distributed to the shareholders of Optibase 
RE 1. The shares that would be issued to Swiss Pro upon exercise of the option will not have voting rights and would be subject to transfer restrictions in favor of Optibase. The option granted 
under  the  Option  Agreement  has  expired  at  the  end  of  eight  years  from  the  entrance  into  the  agreement,  i.e.:  in  October  2017. For  details  on  a  legal  claim  filed  by  Swiss  Pro  against  our 
subsidiaries, see Item 8. “Financial Information - Legal Proceedings”.

Shareholders Agreement with The Phoenix

In connection with the purchase of the office complex in Geneva, Switzerland, we and The Phoenix entered on February 8, 2011 into a Shareholders Agreement regarding our joint 
shareholdings in OPCTN. The Shareholders Agreement provides that Optibase will manage the day-to-day operations of OPCTN and Eldista but that certain actions of OPCTN and Eldista are 
subject  to  the  joint  approval  of  and  The  Phoenix.  These  actions  include  amendments  to  organizational  documents,  changes  to  business  activity,  financing  arrangements,  related  party 
agreements, lease agreements exceeding twenty five percent of the leasable area of the Property, and requesting investments from shareholders in excess of CHF one million in a given year and 
CHF 2.5 million in aggregate.

The Shareholders Agreement also provides that Optibase and The Phoenix will fund operating expenses and necessary capital expenditures for the Property that are not adequately 
funded by operating income, up to an amount of CHF two million per event or CHF five million per event if the capital expenditures are recommended by a third-party building engineering 
company. If we or The Phoenix do not provide our respective share of these expenses, the Shareholders Agreement provides that the OPCTN shareholdings (and shareholders loans) of the non-
funding shareholder ownership will be diluted.

- 80 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Shareholders Agreement prohibited us and The Phoenix from transferring shares in OPCTN until March 2012 and provides that any transfer of shares thereafter (other than to a 
related party) is subject to the reasonable approval of Optibase and The Phoenix. In addition, the Shareholders Agreement includes right of first offer, tag along and drag along rights in favor of 
both Optibase and The Phoenix. The agreement provides that Optibase will make day-to-day decisions and provides The Phoenix with customary protective rights.

German Commercial Properties Portfolio

On December 18, 2014, our wholly owned European subsidiary, Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG, or Optibase Bavaria, entered into a purchase agreement with Lincoln Dreizehnte 
Deutche Grundstucksgellschaft GmbH and Lincoln Land Passau GmbH, unrelated third parties, or the Sellers, to acquire a retail portfolio of twenty-six (26) separate commercial properties in 
Bavaria, Germany, and one (1) commercial property in Saxony, Germany, or the Transaction Portfolio. On June 2, 2015 Optibase Bavaria completed the acquisition of twenty-five (25) supermarkets 
from the Seller and on July 8, 2015 Optibase Bavaria completed the acquisition of two (2) supermarkets. The two acquisitions completes the purchase of twenty-seven (27) supermarkets.

Purchase Price

The total purchase price paid by us to the Sellers at the closings of the transaction, was EUR 28.75 million (app. $31.5 million) (EUR 24 million for the twenty-five supermarkets and 
additional EUR 4.75 million for the two supermarkets), or the Purchase Price. In addition to the Purchase Price, we incurred acquisition costs, including real estate transfer taxes, of approximately 
EUR 2.1 million (app. $2.4 million).

We financed a portion of the Purchase Price with the proceeds of a EUR 20 million senior mortgage loan from DG HYP secured by the Transaction Portfolio (as detailed above), and the 

remaining part through a contribution of equity in part from working capital and in part by obtaining additional financing.

Properties

In general, the Transaction Portfolio, which represents a homogenous retail portfolio in established retail locations, has approximately 37,000 square meters of total rental space and 
currently generates annual net rental income of more than EUR 2.8 million (approximately $3.3 million). The properties have an average occupancy rate of more than 90% of the total rental area, 
and an average remaining lease term of approximately seven years.

Upon the acquisition of the Transaction Portfolio, Optibase Bavaria was assigned the Sellers’ rights and obligations under the leases. The tenants currently operating on Transaction 
Portfolio include 26 supermarkets, and one commercial building with mixed retail and office uses. The largest tenant in the Transaction Portfolio is EDEKA Handelsgesellschaft Südbayern mbH, 
or Edeka, one of the largest supermarket chain in the German market, currently leases 19 of the rental properties in the Transaction Portfolio. In addition to the hypermarkets and supermarkets, 
smaller shops (such as bakeries and post offices) operate on several locations as subtenants of Edeka.

Leases

Optibase  Bavaria  accepted  the  assignment  of  the  Sellers’ rights  and  obligations  under  the  leasehold  estate  agreements  in  respect  of  the  properties,  as  of  the  effective  date  of  the 
purchase agreement, and the Sellers were released from all rights and claims of the tenants and future tenants relating to the period after the respective closing dates. Optibase Bavaria retained 
EUR 295,979 of the Purchase Price (i.e. one gross monthly payment from all the lease agreements acquired) to apply to any amounts which tenants erroneously pay to the Sellers. All rental 
deposits paid by the tenants up until the effective date were transferred by the Sellers to Optibase Bavaria.

- 81 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property-Related Agreements

Upon the closing of the Transaction Portfolio, Optibase Bavaria assumed the Sellers’ rights and obligations under certain services and property management agreements.

Under the terms of a Property Management Agreement, McCafferty Asset Management GmbH, or the Manager, manages the Transaction Portfolio for Optibase Bavaria. The property 
management agreement provides for payment of a yearly property management fee equal to two and one half percent (2.5%) of the net rental income of the Transaction Portfolio. Under the terms 
of an Asset Management Agreement between Optibase Bavaria and the Manager, the Manager provides asset management services for the Transaction Portfolio and is paid two and one half 
percent (2.5%) of the net rental income of the Transaction Portfolio, payable monthly in arrears within 10 business days of receipt of the invoice of a statement showing a detailed calculation of 
the fee.

Insurance

Optibase Bavaria obtained its own insurance for the Transaction Portfolio from the closing dates of the Transaction Portfolio.

South Riverside Plaza Office Tower, Chicago

On December 29, 2015 our wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, Optibase Chicago 300 LLC, or Optibase Chicago, completed an investment of 30% interest in 300 River Holdings, LLC, or 
the Joint Venture Company, which beneficially owns the rights to a 23-story Class A office building, located at 300 South Riverside Plaza in Chicago, or the Property. The Property is under a 
99 year ground lease expiring in 2114.

The remaining 70% of the Joint Venture Company is owned by 300 River Plaza One LLC.As part of this transaction, WKEM Riverside Member LLC, or the Outgoing Member, redeemed 

its 30% interest in the Joint Venture Company.

Investment Amount

We have invested $12.9 million, or the Invested Amount, in exchange for a thirty percent (30%) interest in the Joint Venture Company. In addition to the Investment Amount, we 

incurred acquisition costs of approximately $242,000.

On June 17, 2016, and in accordance with our initial investment agreement in 300 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, we have invested an additional amount of $3 million which accrues 

interest of 12% per annum which was distributed back to the Company on November 21, 2017.

Property

In general, the Property is a 23-story, trophy Class A office building located in Chicago’s premier West Loop submarket and encompasses approximately 1.1 million square feet of total 

rental space, of which 98% was occupied at the purchase date. As of the purchase date, the Property generated annual net rental income of $17.4 million.

The largest tenant in the Property was JP Morgan, which at the date of the purchase leased 486,000 square feet or 46% of the Property.  In addition, there are also smaller tenants and 

retail tenants. JP Morgan has exercised its option to terminate its entire office space at no penalty after September 2016.

Management

The Joint Venture Partner serves as the Managing and generally has the authority to make decisions on behalf of the Company, subject to certain approval rights of Optibase Chicago 

set forth in the Operating Agreement of the Joint Venture Company.

- 82 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt

As a part of the transaction, the Joint Venture Company executed a promissory notes in favor of the Joint Venture Partner in the amount of $42 million with no maturity date and in favor 
of the Outgoing Member in the amount of $18 million with a maturity date of 7 years. The interest rate for both notes compounds annually and is equal to four percent (4%) for the first three (3) 
years, five percent (5%) for the fourth (4th) year, six percent (6%) for the fifth (5th) year, and twelve percent (12%) from and following the sixth (6th) year. All payments to be made under the note 
will be made from and subject to net cash flow of the Joint Venture Company.

The  Joint  Venture  Company  will  also  seek  to  fund  anticipated  tenant  improvements  through  the  issuance  of  up  to  $40  million  of  promissory  notes,  or  the  Senior  Notes,  of  which 
Optibase will have the right (but not the obligation) to fund up to 30%.  Such promissory notes will rank ahead of the abovementioned promissory notes in favor of the Joint Venture Partner and 
the Outgoing Member. It is anticipate that the Senior Notes will have a term of six (6) years and an interest rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, compounding annually.

On June 17, 2016, and in accordance with our initial investment agreement in 300 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, we have invested an additional amount of $3 million which accrues 

interest of 12% per annum which was distributed back to the Company on November 21, 2017.

Financing Agreements

For a summary of the principal terms of our material financing agreements, see Item 5.B "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources".

10.D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Israeli law and regulations do not impose any material foreign exchange restrictions on non-Israeli holders of our ordinary shares. In addition, Israeli citizens are freely to invest outside 

of Israel and convert Israeli currency into non-Israeli currencies.

Dividends, if any, paid to holders of our ordinary shares, and any amounts payable upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding up, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of our 
ordinary shares to an Israeli resident, may be paid in non-Israeli currency or, if paid in Israeli currency, may be converted into freely repatriable dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing at the 
time of conversion.

Under Israeli law (and our memorandum and articles of association), persons who are neither residents nor nationals of Israel may freely hold, vote and transfer ordinary shares in the 
same manner as Israeli residents or nationals. Subject to anti-terror legislations, there are no limitations on the rights of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote ordinary shares imposed 
under Israeli law or under our articles of association.

10.E. TAXATION

The following is a discussion of tax consequences material to us and our Israeli and U.S. shareholders. To the extent the discussion is based on new tax legislation, which has not been 
subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this section. The discussion is not intended, 
and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and does not exhaust all possible tax considerations. Holders of our ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors as to 
the United States, Israeli or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares, including, in particular, the effect of any non-U.S., state or local taxes.

- 83 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Israeli taxation

General Corporate Tax Structure in Israel

                 Israeli companies are generally subject to corporate tax on their taxable income. As of 2017, the corporate tax rate is 24% (in 2015 and 2016, the corporate tax rate was 26.5% and 25%,
respectively). In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 
which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1, 2017 and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018.

Israeli Tax Consequences for Our Shareholders

                 The following description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. You 
should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation, as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any state, local, foreign or 
other taxing jurisdiction.

Certain Israeli Tax Consequences

                 This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of 
investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law.  Examples of such investors include residents of Israel or traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this 
discussion.  Because parts of this discussion are based on new tax legislation that has not yet been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you that the appropriate 
tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this discussion.  The discussion below is subject to change, including due to amendments under Israeli law or changes to the 
applicable judicial or administrative interpretations of Israeli law, which change could affect the tax consequences described below.

Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Non Israeli Resident Shareholders.

                 A non Israeli resident who derives capital gains from the sale of shares in an Israeli resident company that were purchased after the company was listed for trading on a stock exchange 
outside of Israel should be exempt from Israeli tax so long as the shares were not held through a permanent establishment that the nonresident maintains in Israel.  However, non Israeli 
corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemption if Israeli residents:  (i) have a controlling interest of 25% or more in such non Israeli corporation or (ii) are the beneficiaries of, or are 
entitled to, 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.  Such exemption is not applicable to a person whose gains from selling or 
otherwise disposing of the shares are deemed to be a business income.

                 Additionally, a sale of shares by a non Israeli resident may be exempt from Israeli capital gains tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty.  For example, under the United States 
Israel Tax Treaty, the disposition of shares by a shareholder who (i) is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty), (ii) holds the shares as a capital asset, and (iii) is entitled to claim the benefits 
afforded to such person by the treaty, is generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax.  Such exemption will not apply if:  (i) the capital gain arising from the disposition can be attributed to a 
permanent establishment in Israel; (ii) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of the voting capital during any part of the 12 month period preceding the 
disposition, subject to certain conditions; or (iii) such U.S. resident is an individual and was present in Israel for a period or periods aggregating to 183 days or more during the relevant taxable 
year.  In such case, the sale, exchange or disposition of our ordinary shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the United States Israel Tax Treaty, the 
taxpayer would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations under U.S. 
law applicable to foreign tax credits.  The United States Israel Tax Treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.

                 In some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli 
tax at source.  Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale. Specifically, in 
transactions involving a sale of all of the shares of an Israeli resident company, in the form of a merger or otherwise, the Israel Tax Authority may require from shareholders who are not liable for 
Israeli tax to sign declarations in forms specified by this authority or obtain a specific exemption from the Israel Tax Authority to confirm their status as non Israeli resident, and, in the absence of 
such declarations or exemptions, may require the purchaser of the shares to withhold taxes at source.

- 84 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxation of Non Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends.

                 Non-Israeli residents are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares at the rate of 25%, unless relief is provided in a treaty between 
Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence. With respect to a person who is a “substantial shareholder” at the time of receiving the dividend or on any time during the preceding twelve 
months, the applicable tax rate is 30%. A “substantial shareholder” is generally a person who alone or together with such person’s relative or another person who collaborates with such person 
on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the “means of control” of the corporation. “Means of control” generally include the right to vote, receive profits, 
nominate a director or an executive officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, regardless of the source of such right. Dividends 
paid on publicly traded shares, which are registered with and held by a nominee company, to non-Israeli residents are generally subject to Israeli withholding tax at a rate of 25%, unless a 
different rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty, provided that a certificate from the Israel Tax Authority allowing for a reduced withholding tax rate is obtained in advance. Under the 
United States-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld at source in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the United States-
Israel Tax Treaty) is 25%.

                 U.S. residents who are subject to Israeli withholding tax on a dividend may be entitled to a credit or deduction for United States federal income tax purposes in the amount of the taxes 
withheld, subject to detailed rules contained in U.S. tax legislation.

Excess Tax.

                 Individuals who are subject to tax in Israel are also subject to an additional tax at a rate of 3% on annual income exceeding NIS 641,880 for 2018 (and as of 2017, the additional tax was on 
annual income exceeding NIS 640,000), which amount is linked to the annual change in the Israeli consumer price index, including, but not limited to, dividends, interest and capital gain.

United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences that apply to U.S. Holders who hold ordinary shares as capital assets. This summary is based on the 
United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Code, as amended, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, and the U.S.-Israel Tax 
Treaty, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change either prospectively or retroactively. This summary does not address all tax considerations that may be relevant 
with respect to an investment in ordinary shares. This summary does not account for the specific circumstances of any particular investor, such as:

v broker-dealers,

v financial institutions,

v certain insurance companies,

v investors liable for alternative minimum tax,

v tax-exempt organizations,

v non-resident aliens of the U.S. or taxpayers whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar,

v persons who hold the ordinary shares through partnerships or other pass-through entities,

v investors that actually or constructively own 10 percent or more of our voting shares, and

v investors holding ordinary shares as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction.

This summary does not address the effect of any U.S. Federal taxation other than U.S. Federal income taxation. In addition, this summary does not include any discussion of state, local 

or foreign taxation. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the non-U. S. and United States federal, state and local tax considerations of an investment in ordinary shares.

- 85 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For purposes of this summary, a U.S. Holder is:

v an individual who is a citizen or, a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

v a partnership, corporation or other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;

v an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source;

v a trust if: (a) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over administration of the trust, and (b) one or more United States persons have the authority to control 

all substantial decisions of the trust; or

v a trust, if the trust were in existence and qualified as a “United States person,” within the meaning of the Code, on August 20, 1996 under the law as then in effect and elected to continue to 

be so treated.

Additional Tax on Investment Income

In addition to the income taxes described above, U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be subject to a 3.8% Medicare 

contribution tax on net investment income, which includes dividends and capital gains.

Taxation of Dividends

The gross amount of any distributions received with respect to ordinary shares, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld therefrom, will constitute dividends for U.S. Federal 
income  tax  purposes,  to  the  extent  of  our  current  and  accumulated  earnings  and  profits  as  determined  for  U.S.  federal  income  tax  principles.  You  will  be  required  to  include  this  amount  of 
dividends in gross income as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in the ordinary 
shares and any amount in excess of your tax basis, will be treated as gain from the sale of ordinary shares. See Item 10.D. “Exchange Controls” under the heading “Disposition of Ordinary 
Shares” below for the discussion on the taxation of capital gains. Dividends will not qualify for the dividends-received deduction generally available to U.S. corporations under Section 243 of the 
Code.

Certain dividend income received by individual U.S. Holders, may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation. Such dividend income will be taxed at the applicable long-term capital gains 
rate (currently, a maximum rate of 20%) if the dividend is received from a “qualified foreign corporation,” and the shareholder of such foreign corporation holds such stock for at least 61 days 
during the 121-day period that begins on the date that is 60 days before the ex-dividend date for the stock. The holding period is tolled for any days on which the shareholder has reduced his 
risk of loss. A “qualified foreign corporation” is one that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States. A foreign corporation will be treated as qualified 
with respect to any dividend paid, if its stock is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Dividend income will not qualify for the reduced rate of taxation if the 
corporation is a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC (see below), for the year in which the dividend is distributed or for the previous year.

Dividends  that  we  pay  in  NIS,  including  the  amount  of  any  Israeli  taxes  withheld  therefrom,  will  be  included  in  your  income  in  a  U.S.  dollar  amount  calculated  by  reference  to  the 
exchange rate in effect on the day such dividends are received. A U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate other than the rate in effect on 
such day may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. 
tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of NIS.

- 86 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Any Israeli withholding tax imposed on such dividends will be a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, subject to certain limitations 
set out in the Code (or, alternatively, for deduction against income in determining such tax liability). The limitations set out in the Code include computational rules under which non-U.S. tax 
credits allowable with respect to specific classes of income cannot exceed the U.S. federal income taxes otherwise payable with respect to each such class of income. Dividends generally will be 
treated as foreign-source passive income for United States foreign tax credit purposes. Foreign income taxes exceeding the credit limitation for the year of payment or accrual may be carried back 
for the first preceding taxable years and forward for the first ten taxable years in order to reduce U.S. federal income taxes, subject to the credit limitation applicable in each of such years. A U.S. 
Holder will be denied a foreign tax credit with respect to Israeli income tax withheld from dividends received on the ordinary shares to the extent such U.S. Holder has not held the ordinary shares 
for at least 16 days of the 31-day period beginning on the date which is 15 days before the ex-dividend date or to the extent such U.S. Holder is under an obligation to make related payments with 
respect to substantially similar or related property. Any days during which a U.S. Holder has substantially diminished its risk of loss on the ordinary shares are not counted toward meeting the 
16-day holding period required by the statute. The rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and you should consult with your personal tax advisors to determine 
whether and to what extent you would be entitled to this credit.

Dispositions of Ordinary Shares

If you sell or otherwise dispose of ordinary shares, you will recognize gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized 
on the sale or other disposition and the adjusted tax basis in ordinary shares. Subject to the discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” such gain or loss 
generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the ordinary shares for more than one year at the time of the sale or other disposition. In general, 
any gain that you recognize on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares will be U.S.-source for purposes of the foreign tax credit limitation; losses will generally be allocated against U.S. 
source income. Deduction of capital losses is subject to certain limitations under the Code.

In the case of a cash basis U.S. Holder who receives NIS in connection with the sale or disposition of ordinary shares, the amount realized will be based on the U.S. dollar value of the 
NIS received with respect to the ordinary shares as determined on the settlement date of such exchange. A U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into United States dollars 
at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the settlement date may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.

Passive Foreign Investment Companies, or PFIC

There is a substantial risk that we are a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our treatment as a PFIC could result in a reduction in the 

after-tax return to the U.S. Holders of our ordinary shares and may cause a reduction in the value of such shares.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year in which either (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or (ii) the average 
percentage of the value of all of our assets for the taxable year which produce or are held for the production of passive income is at least 50%. For this purpose, cash and real estate properties are 
considered to be an asset which produces passive income. Passive income includes, among others, dividends, interest, certain types of royalties and rents, annuities, net foreign exchange gains 
and losses and the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets which produce passive income. As a result of our substantial cash position and the decline in the value of our 
stock, we may be a PFIC under a literal application of the asset test that looks solely to market value. If we are a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, U.S. Holders of our ordinary shares 
would be required, in certain circumstances, to pay an interest charge together with tax calculated at maximum rates on certain “excess distributions,” including any gain on the sale of ordinary 
shares.

The consequences described above can be mitigated if the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a qualified electing fund, or QEF. A shareholder making the QEF election is 
required for each taxable year to include in income a pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the QEF, subject to a separate election to defer payment of taxes, which deferral 
is subject to an interest charge. We have agreed to supply U.S. Holders with the information needed to report income and gain pursuant to a QEF election. The QEF election is made on a 
shareholder-by-shareholder basis and can be revoked only with the consent of the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS.

- 87 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As an alternative to making the QEF election, the U.S. Holder of PFIC stock which is publicly traded could mitigate the consequences of the PFIC rules by electing to mark the stock to 
market annually, recognizing as ordinary income or loss each year an amount equal to the difference as of the close of the taxable year between the fair market value of the PFIC stock and the 
U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the PFIC stock. Losses would be allowed only to the extent of net mark-to-market gain previously included by the U.S. Holder under the election for prior 
taxable years. All U.S. Holders are advised to consult their own tax advisers about the PFIC rules generally and about the advisability, procedures and timing of their making any of the available 
tax elections, including the QEF or mark-to-market elections.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Payments  in  respect  of  ordinary  shares  may  be  subject  to  information  reporting  to  the  U.S.  Internal  Revenue  Service  and  to  a  28  percent  U.S.  backup  withholding  tax.  Backup 
withholding  will  not  apply,  however,  if  you  (i)  are  a  corporation  or  come  within  certain  exempt  categories,  and  demonstrate  the  fact  when  so  required,  or  (ii)  furnish  a  correct  taxpayer 
identification number and make any other required certification. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against a U.S. 
Holder’s U.S. tax liability, and a U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Any 
U.S. holder who holds 10% or more in vote or value of our ordinary shares may be subject to certain additional United States information reporting requirements.

U.S. Gift and Estate Tax

An individual U.S. Holder of ordinary shares will be subject to U.S. gift and estate taxes with respect to ordinary shares in the same manner and to the same extent as with respect to 

other types of personal property.

Other Income Tax

Taxable income of the Company's subsidiary in Luxemburg, Switzerland, Germany and the United States is subject to federal tax at the rate of approximately 29%, 24%, 16% and 21% 

respectively in 2018.

10.F. DIVIDEND AND PAYING AGENTS

Not applicable.

10.G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS

Not applicable.

10.H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, applicable to foreign private issuers, and under those requirements, we file reports with the SEC. Our 

filings with the SEC are available to the public through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

10.I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Most of our revenues are generated in CHF but a portion of our expenses is incurred in NIS and in U.S. dollars. Therefore, our results of operations may be seriously harmed by inflation 
in Israel and currency fluctuations. In addition, following the closing of the Transaction Portfolio in Germany as detailed in Item 10.C. “Material Contracts” above, our results of operations will be 
exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rate of NIS against the U.S. dollar and against the EUR as well.

- 88 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The deflation rate in Israel was approximately (0.2) % in 2016, an inflation rate of approximately 0.4% in 2017and a deflation rate of approximately (0.2) % in 2018. The changes of the NIS 
against the dollar was an appreciation of approximately 1.5% in 2016, 9.8% in 2017, and a devaluation of approximately (8.1)% in 2018. The change of the CHF against the dollar was a devaluation 
of approximately (2.8)% in 2016, an appreciation of approximately 4.4% in 2017, and a devaluation of approximately (0.8)% in 2018. The change of the Euro against the dollar was a devaluation of 
approximately (3.6)% in 2016, an appreciation of approximately 13.7%  in 2017 and  a devaluation of approximately (4.5)% 2018.

Our operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to guard against currency fluctuations in the future. Accordingly, we may enter into currency hedging transactions to 
decrease  the  risk  of  financial  exposure  from  fluctuations  in  the  exchange  rate  of  NIS  against  the  U.S.  dollar  and  against  the  CHF  and  against  the  EUR.  These  measures,  however,  may  not 
adequately protect us from material adverse effects due to the impact of inflation in Israel.

The presentation currency of the financial statements is the U.S. dollar.

Our functional currency is the U.S Dollar.

The functional currencies of Optibase’s subsidiaries are CHF, EUR and U.S dollar. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the year-end exchange rates and their 
statement  of  operations  items  are  translated  using  the  average  exchange  rates  for  all  periods  presented.  The  resulting  translation  adjustments  are  recorded  as  a  separate  component  of 
accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity.

In February 2016,  we entered into a hedging of cross currency interest rate swap transaction for the total amount of approximately NIS 34.2 million at fixed interest rate of 6.7% in 

exchange for approximately $8.7 million at fixed interest rate of 7.95% with semi-annually payments commencing on June 2016 through December 2021, the termination date.

Interest Rate and Rating Risks

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates in Switzerland relates primarily to our long term loan taken for the purchase of our real-estate property in Switzerland and 

denominated in Swiss Franks (CHF). Changes in Swiss interest rates, could affect our financial results.

Investments Risks

As of December 31, 2018, our available net cash was $13.8 million. As of December 31, 2018, our available cash was invested in various bank deposits and money market funds with 

various banks. Our available cash is subject to the credit risk of the banks with which the funds are deposited and as such we may suffer losses if those banks fail to repay those deposits.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable. For a description of our Series A Bonds see “Item 5.B: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

- 89 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

PART II

Not applicable.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

    (a)    Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 
2018. Based on such review, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that we have in place effective controls and procedures designed to ensure that information 
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our 
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, 
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

    (b)    Our management, under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our 
financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process 
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:

•

•

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and asset dispositions;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial 
statements.

     Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future 

periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

     Under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  our  management,  including  our  principal  executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer,  we  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  our 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December 31,  2018  based  on  the  framework  for  Internal  Control-Integrated  Framework  (1992)  set  forth  by  The  Committee  of  Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 
2018.

    This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting, because we are neither a “large

accelerated filer” nor an “accelerated filer” as those terms are defined in the Securities Exchange Act.

- 90 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                (c)    There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified with the evaluation thereof that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that have 
materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The board of directors has determined that Ms. Orli Garti-Seroussi is an  “audit committee financial expert” and that she is independent under the applicable Securities and Exchange 

Commission and NASDAQ listing rules.

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our employees, including our chief executive officer and senior financial officers. The Code of Business Conduct and 

Ethics is attached as Exhibit 11.1 to this annual report, and published on our website in the address: http://www.optibase-holdings.com.

ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Kost, Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, or Ernst & Young has served as our independent public accountants for each of the fiscal years in the three-year

period ended December 31, 2018, for which audited financial statements appear in this annual report on Form 20-F.

The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by Kost, Forer Gabbay & Kasierer in Israel and by Ernst & Young in Switzerland 

and in the United States, to Optibase in 2017 and 2018 (in thousands of dollars):

Audit fees (1)
Audit-related fees (2)
Tax fees (3)
Total

2017
111
5
42
158

2018
107
5
43
155

(1) Audit fees consist of fees billed for the annual audit services engagement and other audit services, which are those services that only the external auditor can reasonably provide, and 

include the group audit; statutory audits; comfort letters and consents; attest services; and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2) Audit-related  fees  consist  of  fees  billed  for  assurance  and  related  services  that  are  reasonably  related  to  the  performance  of  the  audit  or  review  of  our  financial  statements  or  that  are 
traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards; internal control reviews of new systems, programs and 
projects; review of security controls and operational effectiveness of systems; review of plans and control for shared service centers, due diligence related to acquisitions; accounting 
assistance and audits in connection with proposed or completed acquisitions; and employee benefit plan audits.

(3) Tax  fees  include  fees  billed  for  tax  compliance  services,  including  the  preparation  of  original  and  amended  tax  returns  and  claims  for  refund;  tax  consultations,  such  as  assistance  and 
representation in connection with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, transfer pricing, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authority; 
tax planning services; and expatriate tax planning and services.

- 91 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
                                   
 
 
Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

Our  audit  committee's  main  role  is  to  assist  the  board  of  directors  in  fulfilling  its  responsibility  for  oversight  of  the  quality  and  integrity  of  the  accounting,  auditing  and  reporting 
practices of the Company. Our audit committee oversees the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the public accounting firm engaged to prepare or issue an audit report on the financial 
statements of the Company. Our audit committee's specific responsibilities in carrying out its oversight role include the approval of all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the external 
auditor and quarterly review the firm's non-audit services and related fees. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, as described above. 
It  is  the  policy  of  our  audit  committee  to  approve  in  advance  the  particular  services  or  categories  of  services  to  be  provided  to  the  Company  periodically.  Additional  services  may  be  pre-
approved by our audit committee on an individual basis during the year.

During  2017 and 2018, our audit committee approved all the audit-related fees, tax fees or other fees provided to us by Kost, Forer Gabbay & Kasierer in Israel or by Ernst & Young in 

Switzerland and in the United States.

ITEM 16D. EXEMPTION FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEE

We have not and do not expect to apply for any exemptions from the NASDAQ listing standards for audit committees.

ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 16F. CHANGES IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

None.

ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

There are no significant ways in which the Company’s corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Market.

ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

- 92 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PART III

The  financial  statements  required  by  this  item  are  found  at  the  end  of  this  annual  report,  beginning  on  page  F-1.  The  financial  statements  of  300  RIVER  HOLDINGS,  LLC are  also 

provided pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.:

Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm          
Consolidated Balance Sheets          
Consolidated Statements of Operations          
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income          
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity          
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements          

Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements of 300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC          

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

- 93 -

Page
F-2
F-3 - F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8 - F-9
F-10 - F-42

Page
F-44 –F-58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018

U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS

INDEX

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

F-2

F-3 - F-4

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8 - F-9

F-10 - F-42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
144 Menachem Begin Road, Building A,
Tel-Aviv 6492102, Israel

Tel: +972-3-6232525
Fax: +972-3-5622555
ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accountig Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Optibase LTD

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Optibase  Ltd.  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  as  of  December  31,  2018  and  2017,  the  related  consolidated 
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), change in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes 
(collectively referred to as the "financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2018 
and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We did not audit the financial statements of 300 RIVER HOLDINGS LLC ,an associate accounted for using the equity method, amounted to approximately $ 6,953 thousand as of December 31, 
2018, and the Company's share in its net loss amounted to approximately $ 5,254 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018. Those statements were audited by other auditors, whose report 
has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for 300 RIVER HOLDINGS LLC, is based solely on the report of the other auditor.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. 
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in 
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over 
financial  reporting.  As  part  of  our  audits  we  are  required  to  obtain  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the 
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to 
those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting 
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis 
for our opinion.

We have served as the Company's auditor since at least 1997, but we are unable to determine the specific year.

Tel-Aviv, Israel
 28 March, 2019

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global

F - 2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

U.S. dollars in thousands

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $ 207 and $ 161 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively)
Other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses

  $

Total current assets

LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS:
Long-term deposits
Investments in companies and associates

Total long-term investments

PROPERTY AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

Real estate property, net
Other assets, net

Total property, equipment and other assets

Total assets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 3

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

13,836 
31 
427 
320 

14,614 

2,477 
14,377 

16,854 

212,349 
141 

212,490 

20,268 
292 
332 
506 

21,398 

3,483 
17,556 

21,039 

216,726 
140 

216,866 

  $

243,958 

  $

259,303 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term loans and bonds
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses
Total liabilities attributed to discontinued operations

Total current liabilities

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Deferred tax liabilities
Land lease liability, net
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Loan from controlling shareholder
Long-term loans, net of current maturities
Long-term bonds, net of current maturities

Total long-term liabilities

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Share capital -

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

  $

5,788 
4,103 
2,061 

11,952 

13,752 
6,134 
206 
2,476 
130,806 
5,239 

158,613 

6,048 
4,362 
2,061 

12,471 

14,042 
6,295 
294 
4,886 
135,774 
8,473 

169,764 

Ordinary shares of NIS 0.65 par value -
Authorized: 6,000,000 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017; Issued: 5,216,256 and 5,214,256 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively;  
Outstanding: 5,198,361 and 5,188,361 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively

994 

993 

Additional paid-in capital
Treasury shares: 17,895 and  25,895 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively
Other reserves
Accumulated deficit

Total shareholders' equity of Optibase Ltd.

Non-controlling interests

Total shareholders' equity

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

28 March, 2019
Date of approval of the
financial statements

Amir Philips
Chief Executive Officer

F - 4

138,187 

(87)  
(706)  
(84,829)  

53,559 

19,834 

73,393 

138,170 
(87)
9 
(82,048)

57,037 

20,031 

77,068 

  $

243,958 

  $

259,303 

Alex Hilman
Executive Chairman
of the Board

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

Fixed income from real estate rent

Costs and expenses:

Cost of real estate operations
Real estate depreciation and amortization
General and administrative

Total costs and expenses

Operating income

Other income
Financial expenses, net

Income before taxes on income
Taxes on income
Equity share in losses of associates, net

Net income (loss)

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

Net income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd.

Net earnings per share:

Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2016

2018

  $

16,608 

  $

16,587 

  $

16,338 

2,991 
4,317 
3,500 

10,808 

5,800 

607 
(2,882)  

3,525 
(1,464)  
(2,765)  

(704)  

2,077 

3,057 
4,209 
2,698 

9,964 

6,623 

597 
(2,769)  

4,451 
(1,602)  
(1,677)  

1,172 

2,295 

(2,781)   $

(1,123)   $

3,159 
4,244 
2,615 

10,018 

6,320 

1,116 
(3,366)

4,070 
(1,627)
(323)

2,120 

1,925 

195 

(0.54)   $

(0.22)   $

0.04 

  $

  $

Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic net earnings per share:

5,185,352 

5,180,163 

5,147,130 

Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted net earnings per share:

5,185,352 

5,180,163 

5,157,165 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

U.S. dollars in thousands

Net income (loss)

Foreign currency translation adjustments
Financial liability related to hedging

Comprehensive income (loss)

Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests
Other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2016

2018

  $

(704)   $

1,172 

  $

(1,052)  
88 

(1,668)  

(2,077)  
207 

3,357 
113 

4,642 

(2,295)  
(831)  

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Optibase Ltd.

  $

(3,538)   $

1,516 

  $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

2,120 

(1,475)
(143)

502 

(1,925)
522 

(901)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

U.S. dollars in thousands

Ordinary
shares

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Other
reserves

Accumulated
deficit

Total
shareholders'
equity of 
Optibase Ltd.  

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
shareholders'
equity

Balance as of January 1, 2016

988 

  $

137,961 

  $

(354)   $

(1,906)   $

(80,905)   $

55,784 

  $

19,800 

  $

75,584 

Stock-based compensation
Issuance of shares upon exercise of 

stock options

Issuance of treasury shares upon 

vesting of shares

Dividend to non-controlling interests  
Other comprehensive loss
Net income

- 

5 

- 
- 
- 
- 

60 

186 

(52)  
- 
- 
- 

- 

- 

267 
- 
- 
- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

(1,096)  

- 

- 

- 

(215)  
- 
- 
195 

60 

191 

- 
- 

(1,096)  
195 

- 

- 

- 

(2,209)  
(522)  
1,925 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

993 

138,155 

(87)  

(3,002)  

(80,925)  

55,134 

18,994 

Stock-based compensation
Dividend to non-controlling

interests

Other comprehensive income
Equity component of transaction with 

controlling shareholder

Net income (loss)

- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

15 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

993 

138,170 

(87)  

Stock-based compensation
Issuance of shares upon exercise of 

stock options

Dividend to non-controlling

interests

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Equity component of transaction with 

controlling shareholder

Net income (loss)

- 

1 

- 
- 

- 
- 

17 

- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
2,639 

372 
- 

9 

- 

- 

- 
(757)  

42 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

(1,123)  

15 

- 
2,639 

372 
(1,123)  

(82,048)  

57,037 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

(2,781)  

17 

1 

- 
(757)  

42 
(2,781)  

- 

(2,089)  
831 

- 
2,295 

20,031 

- 

- 

(2,067)  
(207)  

- 
2,077 

60 

191 

- 
(2,209)
(1,618)
2,120 

74,128 

15 

(2,089)
3,470 

372 
1,172 

77,068 

17 

1 

(2,067)
(964)

42 
(704)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

  $

994 

  $

138,187 

  $

(87)   $

(706)   $

(84,829)   $

53,559 

  $

19,834 

  $

73,393 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

U.S. dollars in thousands

Cash flows from operating activities:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2016

2018

Net income (loss)
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

  $

(704)   $

1,172 

  $

Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation related to options and unvested shares
Increase in trade receivables
Equity share in losses of associates, net
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities
Decrease in land lease liabilities
Decrease (increase) in other accounts receivable and prepaid expenses
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other accounts payable

Net cash provided by continuing operations
Net cash used in discontinued operations

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investment in real estate property
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
Proceeds from (investments in) associates, net
Decrease (increase) in other long-term deposits

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 8

4,317 
17 
(109)  
2,765 
(173)  
(108)  
965 
(103)  

6,867 
- 

6,867 

(2,764)  
261 
414 
105 

(1,984)  

4,209 
15 
(112)  
1,998 
(169)  
(106)  
(791)  
1,685 

7,901 
- 

7,901 

(2,195)  
(292)  
3,338 
265 

1,116 

2,120 

4,244 
60 
(46)
520 
(177)
(107)
(370)
1,060 

7,304 
(48)

7,256 

(2,450)
- 
(2,749)
159 

(5,040)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

U.S. dollars in thousands

Cash flows from financing activities:

Repayment of long-term bank loans and bonds
Proceeds from bank loan
Dividend paid to non-controlling interests
Proceeds from (repayment of) controlling shareholders' loan
Issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options

Net cash used in financing activities

Exchange differences on balances of cash and cash equivalents

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

(a) Supplemental cash flow activities:

   Cash paid during the year for:

   Taxes

   Interest

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F - 9

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(6,558)  

- 

(2,067)  
(2,500)  

- 

(11,125)  

(190)  

(6,432)  
20,268 

13,836 

(8,431)  

- 

(2,089)  
5,118 
- 

(5,402)  

629 

4,244 
16,024 

20,268 

  $

  $

2,521 

  $

2,744 

  $

2,484 

  $

2,554 

  $

(8,112)
530 
(2,209)
- 
191 

(9,600)

(398)

(7,782)
23,806 

16,024 

1,420 

2,896 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 1:-

GENERAL

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

a.

Optibase Ltd. (the "Company") was incorporated and commenced operations in 1990.

During 2009 the Company entered into the fixed-income real estate sector after an acquisition of a commercial building in Switzerland.

Until the sale of its video solutions business to VITEC Multimedia ("Vitec") in July 2010 (see Note 1d below), the Company and its U.S subsidiary, Optibase Inc., provided 
equipment for a wide range of professional video applications in the Broadband IPTV, Broadcast, Government, Enterprise and Post-production markets. (Collectively, the 
"Video Activity"). Following the sale of the Video Activity, the Company's only operation is the fixed-income real-estate.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company manages its activity through four active subsidiaries: Optibase Inc. in the United States which was incorporated in 1991 ("Optibase 
Inc."),  Optibase  Real  Estate  Europe  SARL  ("Optibase  SARL")  in  Luxembourg  which  was  incorporated  in  October  2009,  Optibase  RES  SARL  in  Luxembourg  which  was 
incorporated in June, 2018 and OPCTN SA, a Luxembourg company owned 51% by the Company which was incorporated in February 2011 ("Subsidiaries"), (collectively, 
the "Group").

b.

Investments in associates:

1.

Retail portfolio in Bavaria, Germany:

On December 18, 2014 the Company through Optibase SARL subsidiary, Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG ("Optibase Bavaria"), entered into a Purchase Agreement 
with an unrelated third party to acquire a retail portfolio of twenty-seven Commercial properties in, Germany (the "Retail Portfolio in Germany").

The Retail Portfolio in Germany represents a homogenous retail portfolio in established retail locations, it has approximately 37,000 square meters of total rental space.

The largest tenant in the Retail Portfolio in Germany is EDEKA, which currently leases 19 of the rental properties in the portfolio. In addition to the hypermarkets and 
supermarkets, smaller shops (such as bakeries and post offices) operate on several locations as subtenants of EDEKA.

On June 2, 2015 the first stage of the transaction closing occurred and the Company acquired twenty-five (25) supermarkets in consideration of a purchase price of €
24,000 (approximately $ 26,249 as of the purchase date). On July 8, 2015 the Company acquired the two (2) remaining supermarkets for an additional purchase price of 
€ 4,750 (approximately $ 5,224 as of the purchase date).

In  addition  to  the  purchase  price,  the  Company  incurred  acquisition  costs,  including  real  estate  transfer  taxes  of  € 2,075  (approximately  $ 2,352  during  2015)  and
presented in the consolidated statements of operations as other operating costs.

F - 10

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 1:-

GENERAL (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The portfolio purchase price has been allocated to real estate properties and other assets, net, in accordance with the Company's accounting policies for business 
combinations.

The total purchase price was allocated as follows:

Real estate property
Other assets, net

Total purchase price

2.          300 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago:

  $

  $

31,399 
74 

31,473 

On  December  29,  2015,  the  company through  its subsidiary,  Optibase  Inc.,  completed  an  investment  in  300  River  Holdings,  LLC,  (the  "Joint  Venture  Company") 
which beneficially owns the rights to a 23-story Class A office building located at 300 South Riverside Plaza in Chicago under a 99 year ground lease expiring in 2114. 
The company invested $ 12,900 in exchange for a thirty percent (30%) interest in the Joint Venture Company. In addition to the Purchase Price, the Company incurred 
acquisition  costs  of  approximately  $  242.  On  June  17,  2016,  and  in  accordance  with  the  Company's  initial  investment  agreement,  the  Company  had  invested  an 
additional amount of $ 3,000 which accrued interest of 12% per annum, and was distributed back to the Company on November 21, 2017.

c.

The Company's two major tenants accounted for 18% and 16%, 18% and 16% and 18% and 18% of the Company revenues in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 
2016 respectively. No other tenants accounted for more than 10% of the Company revenues.
For further details regarding a dispute to which OPCTN's subsidiary, Eldista Gmbh (“Eldista”), see Note 11e(4).

d.          Sale of the Video Activity (discontinued operations):

Until the sale of its video solutions business to VITEC Multimedia ("Vitec") in July 2010, the Company and its U.S subsidiary, Optibase Inc., provided equipment for a wide 
range of professional video applications in the Broadband IPTV, Broadcast, Government, Enterprise and Post-production markets (collectively, the "Video Activity").

On  March  16,  2010,  the  Company  and  its  subsidiary,  Optibase  Inc.,  entered  into  an  asset  purchase  agreement  (the  "Agreement")  with  Optibase  Technologies  Ltd.  and 
Stradis  Inc.,  wholly  owned  subsidiaries  of  S.A.  Vitec  (also  known  as  Vitec  Multimedia)  (S.A.  Vitec,  Optibase  Technologies  Ltd.  and  Stradis  Inc.,  collectively,  "Vitec"). 
According to the Agreement, the Company sold to Vitec all of the assets and liabilities related to the Company's Video Solutions Business (the "Video Activity"). The 
closing of the transaction occurred on July 1, 2010.

F - 11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 1:-

GENERAL (Cont.)

The liabilities of the Video activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which relates to the discontinued operations and presented in the consolidated balance 
sheets, are summarized as follows:

Liabilities:

Total liabilities attributed to discontinued operations

  $

2,061    $

2,061 

Year ended
December 31,

2018

2017

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a.

Basis of presentation of the financial statements:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect 
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company's management believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used are 
reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities 
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b.

Functional currency, presentation currency and foreign currency:

The presentation currency of the financial statements is the U.S. dollar.

The functional currency of the Company is the U.S Dollar.

The functional currencies of Optibase's subsidiaries are CHF, EUR and U.S dollar. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the year-end exchange rates 
and their statement of operations items are translated using the average exchange rates for all periods presented. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a 
separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity.

c.

Principles of consolidation:

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries.  Intercompany  transactions  and  balances  have  been  eliminated  upon 
consolidation.

F - 12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

d.

Non-controlling interests:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Non-controlling interests generally represent the portion of equity that the Company does not own in the consolidated entities. The Company accounts for and reports its 
non-controlling  interests  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  required  under  the  Consolidation  Topic  of  the  FASB  ASC  810.  Non-controlling  interests  are  separately 
presented within the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts of consolidated net earnings attributable to the Company and to the non-controlling
interests are presented on the consolidated statement of operations.

e.

Cash equivalents:

Cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash, with original maturities of three months or less at the date acquired.

f.

Property and equipment:

Real estate properties and equipment are stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Costs include those related to acquisition, including building improvements.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:

Building
Buildings' improvements
Condominium units

g.

Impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets:

Years

25 - 63
5 - 20
30

The Group's long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" and ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and other”,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, the 
Company makes judgments regarding whether impairment indicators exist based on legal factors, market conditions and operating performances of assets or asset groups. 
Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by 
the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

F - 13

 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The  Company  reviews  assets  on  a  component-level  basis,  which  is  the  lowest  level  of  assets  for  which  there  are  identifiable  cash  flows  that  can  be  distinguished 
operationally  and  for  financial  reporting  purposes.  The  carrying  amount  of  the  asset  was  compared  with  the  related  expected  undiscounted  future  cash  flows  to  be 
generated by those assets over the estimated remaining useful life of the primary asset. In cases where the expected undiscounted future cash flows were less than the 
carrying amounts of the assets, those assets were considered impaired and written down to their fair values. Fair value was established based on discounted cash flows. As 
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, no impairment losses have been identified.

h.         Investments in companies:

Investments  in  non-marketable  equity  securities  of  companies  in  which  the  Company  does  not  have  control  or  the  ability  to  exercise  significant  influence  over  their 
operation and financial policies are recorded at cost.

The management evaluates investments in non-marketable equity securities as evidence of other-than temporary declines in value. When relevant factors indicate a decline 
in value that is other-than temporary the Company recognizes an impairment loss for the decline in value.

i.

Investments in associates:

Associates are companies in which the Company has significant influence over the financial and operating policies without having control. The investment in associates is 
accounted  for  using  the  equity  method  of  accounting.  Under  the  equity  method,  the  investment  in  associates  is  accounted  for  in  the  financial  statements  at  cost  plus 
changes  in  the  Group's  share  of  net  assets,  including  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  of  the  associates.  The  equity  method  is  applied  until  the  loss  of  significant 
influence or classification of the investment as non-current asset held-for-sale.

The accounting policy in the financial statements of the associates has been applied consistently and uniformly with the policy applied in the financial statements of the 
Group.

j.

Intangibles assets:

Intangible assets consist of above-market value of in-place leases that were recorded in connection with the acquisition of the properties. Intangible assets are amortized 
and accreted using the straight-line method over the term of the related leases. When a lease is terminated early, any remaining unamortized balances under lease intangible 
assets or liabilities are charged to earnings.

F - 14

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

k.

Derivative instruments:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging based on ASC No. 815, "Derivatives and Hedging". ASC No. 815 requires the Company to recognize all derivatives at 
fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument (i.e., gains or losses) depends on whether it has been designated and qualified as part of a 
hedging  relationship  and  further,  on  the  type  of  hedging  relationship.  For  those  derivative  instruments  that  are  designated  and  qualified  as  hedging  instruments,  the 
Company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign 
operation. If the derivatives meet the definition of a hedge and are so designated, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of such derivatives will 
either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, firm commitments through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the 
hedged item is recognized in earnings.

The  ineffective  portion  of  a  derivative's  change  in  fair  value  is  recognized  in  earnings.  As  of  December  31,  2018  and  2017,  the  Company  had  outstanding  hedging 
instruments in the amount of $ 206 and $ 294 respectively, which included in long-term liabilities, and a outstanding hedging instruments in the amount of $ 313 and $ 986, 
respectively, which included in long-term Assets.
At times, the Company may use derivative instruments to manage exposure to variable interest and currency rate risk. Occasionally, the Company enters into interest and 
currency rate swaps to manage its exposure to variable interest and currency rate risk and treasury locks to manage the risk of interest and currency rates rising prior to the 
issuance of debt.

l.

Revenue recognition:

The Company generates revenues from fixed income real-estate according to ASC 840 which derived from its buildings held through its subsidiaries in Switzerland (Rümlang 
and Geneva), Germany and Miami FL.

Rental income includes minimum rents which are recognized on an accrual basis over the terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis. Lease revenue recognition 
commences when the lessee is given possession of the leased space and there are no contingencies offsetting the lessee's obligation to pay rent.

Revenue of maintenance expenses recoveries from the tenants for mainly electricity, heating and water is reported net from the related expenses.

m.

Contingencies:

The Company periodically estimates the impact of various conditions, situations and/or circumstances involving uncertain outcomes to its financial condition and operating 
results.

F - 15

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The  Company  accounts  for  contingent  events  as  required  by  ASC  450  "Contingencies".  ASC  450  defines  a  contingency  as  "an  existing  condition,  situation,  or  set  of 
circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible gain or loss to an enterprise that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur". Legal 
proceedings are a form of such contingencies.

In accordance with ASC 450, accruals for exposures or contingencies are being provided when the expected outcome is probable. However, it is possible that future results 
of operations for any particular quarter or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company's assumptions, the actual outcome of such proceedings or 
as a result of the effectiveness of the Company strategies related to these proceedings.

n.

Income taxes:

The Company and its subsidiaries account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, "Income Taxes" "ASC 740", prescribes the use of the liability method, 
whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are 
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company and its subsidiaries provide a valuation 
allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be realized.

ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes by establishing minimum standards for the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected 
to be taken in a tax return. Under the requirements of ASC 740, the Company must review all of its tax positions and make a determination as to whether its position is more-
likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by regulatory authorities. If a tax position meets the more-likely–than-not standard, then the related tax benefit is measured 
based on a cumulative probability analysis of the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement or disposition of the underlying issue. The 
Company policy is to accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its tax expenses.

The Company believes that its tax positions are all highly certain of being upheld upon examination. As such, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company has not 
recorded a liability for uncertain tax positions.

o.

Concentrations of credit risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company and its subsidiaries to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts 
receivables and long-term lease deposits.

F - 16

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Cash and cash equivalents are invested in U.S. dollar deposits with major banks in Israel, the United States, Switzerland and Germany. Cash and cash equivalents in the 
United  States  may  be  in  excess  of  insured  limits  and  are  not  insured  in  other  jurisdictions.  The  Company  maintains  cash  and  cash  equivalents  with  diverse  financial 
institutions and monitors the amount of credit exposure to each financial institution.

Accounts  receivable  includes  amounts  billed  to  tenants  and  accrued  expense  recoveries  due  from  tenants.  The  Company  makes  estimates  of  un-collectability  from  its 
accounts receivable using the specific identification method related to base rents, straight-line rent balances, expense reimbursements and other revenues.

The Company also analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit-worthiness, payment history and current economic trends when evaluating the 
adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are written-off when they are deemed to be uncollectible and the Company is no longer actively 
pursuing collection. The Company's reported net income is directly affected by the management's estimate of the collectability of accounts receivable.

p.

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic net earnings (losses) per share are computed based on the weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding during each year. Diluted net earnings (losses) 
per  share  is  computed  based  on  the  weighted  average  number  of  Ordinary  shares  outstanding  during  each  year,  plus  dilutive  potential  Ordinary  shares  considered 
outstanding during the year, in accordance with ASC 260, "Earning Per Share".

Options and restricted shares that have been excluded from the calculations of diluted net income per share were 10,035 for the years ended December 31, 2016.

q.

Accounting for stock-based compensation:

ASC Topic 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation" "ASC 718", requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option-
pricing model.

The Company recognizes these compensation costs net of forfeiture rate and recognizes the compensation costs for only those shares expected to vest on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of four years.

F - 17

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The  Company  estimates  the  fair  value  of  stock  options  granted  using  the  Black-Scholes-  Merton  option  pricing  model.  The  option-pricing  model  requires  a  number  of 
assumptions, of which the most significant are the expected stock price volatility and the expected option term. Expected volatility is calculated based upon actual historical 
stock price movements. The expected term of options granted is based upon historical experience and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be 
outstanding. The risk free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. treasury bonds with an equivalent term. The Company has historically not paid dividends and has no 
foreseeable plans to pay dividends.

The fair value was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. During 2018 and 2017 there were no new grants.

r.          Treasury shares:

During the past years, the Company repurchased certain Ordinary shares on the open market and holds such shares as treasury shares. The Company presents the cost to 
repurchase treasury shares as a reduction from the shareholders' equity. From time to time the Company reissues treasury shares under the stock purchase plan, upon 
exercise of option and upon vesting of restricted stock units.

When treasury stock is reissued, the Company accounts for the re-issuance in accordance with ASC No. 505-30, "Treasury Stock" and charges the excess of the purchase 
cost,  including  related  stock-based  compensation  expenses,  over  the  re-issuance  price  to  retained  earnings.  The  purchase  cost  is  calculated  based  on  the  specific 
identification method. In case the purchase cost is lower than the re-issuance price, the Company credits the difference to additional paid-in capital.

s.         Fair value of financial instruments:

The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, other accounts receivable, trade payables, other accounts payable, and 
accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their generally short-term maturities.

ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between 
market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an 
asset or a liability.

As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-level value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in 
measuring fair value:

F - 18

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Level 1 -
Level 2 -
Level 3 -

Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
Swap instruments are measured at fair value under ASC 820 on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

t.

Comprehensive income:

The Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with ASC No. 220, "Comprehensive Income". Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in 
shareholders' equity during the period except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, shareholders.

u.

Recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements:

In  November  2016,  the  FASB  issued  Accounting  Standards  Update  No.  2016-18, Statement  of  Cash  Flows  (Topic  230):  Restricted  Cash  (ASU  2016-18),  which 
requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-
period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 during the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this 
new guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated  balance sheets, statements of  operations and cash flows.

In  January  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASC  2016-01,  Financial  Instruments  -  Overall  (Subtopic  825-10) -  Recognition  and  Measurement  of  Financial  Assets  and  Financial 
Liabilities. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The ASU, among other targeted changes for 
financial  assets  and  liabilities,  requires  equity  investments  with  readily  determinable  fair  values  to  be  measured  at  fair  value  with  changes  recognized  in  net  income.  In 
accordance with ASU 2016-01, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus 
or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issue.

The Company has equity investments in a privately-held company. This investment is recorded at cost reduced by any impairment write-downs plus or minus changes 
resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer, because it has no readily determinable fair values. 
The investment is included in investments in companies and associates in long term investments the accompanying balance sheets. The Company monitors the investment 
and if facts and circumstances indicate any observable price changes or that the investment may be

F - 19

 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 2:-        SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)

New accounting pronouncements not yet effective: 

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, on the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees 
and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the 
lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a 
straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset ("ROU") and a lease liability for all leases with a term of 
greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for in a manner similar to the accounting under existing 
guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for 
sales- type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASC 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, ASC 840, "Leases". The guidance is effective for the 
interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, and the Company has adopted the standard on January 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition 
approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. The standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in 
transition.  The  Company  is  electing  the  ‘package  of  practical  expedients’, which  permits  us  not  to  reassess  under  the  new  standard  our  prior  conclusions  about  lease 
identification,  lease  classification  and  initial  direct  costs.  To  adopt  this  new  standard,  the  Company  has  implemented  changes  to  our  existing  systems  and  processes  in 
conjunction with a review of existing vendor agreements. The Company expect adoption of the standard to have an immaterial impact on the Company's consolidated balance 
sheets which will result in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities of approximately $436 to $528 at January 1, 2019. The most significant impact from recognition of 
ROU assets and lease liabilities relates to our office space. However, the Company do not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have an immaterial impact on the 
operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations since the expense recognition under this new standard will be similar to current practice. The Company's 
financial income (expenses), net will be impacted by the revaluation of the lease liabilities in non-USD denominated currencies.

Furthermore , the Company does not anticipiates the adoption of this standart will have immaterial impact in their revenue recognition.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial  Instruments – Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which requires that expected credit losses relating to 
financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount 
of credit losses to be recognized for available for sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and also requires the reversal of previously 
recognized  credit  losses  if  fair  value  increases.  The  new  standard  will  be  effective  for  interim  and  annual  periods  beginning  after  January  1,  2020,  and  early  adoption  is 
permitted.

F - 20

 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 3:-

REAL ESTATE PROPERTY, NET

Cost:

At January 1, 2017

Additions

At December 31, 2017

Additions

At December 31, 2018

Accumulated depreciation:

At January 1, 2017

Depreciation charge for the year

At December 31, 2017

Depreciation charge for the year

At December 31, 2018

Real estate property, net:

At December 31, 2018

At December 31, 2017

Estimated depreciation expenses by years are as follows:

Year

2019
2020
2021
2022 and thereafter

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Land

Building

Condominium
units

Currency
translation
adjustment

Total

  $

  $

33,874 
- 

186,829 
1,945 

  $

20,455    $
250   

(14,676)   $
11,266 

33,874 
- 

33,874 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

188,774 
2,056 

190,830 

17,509 
3,696 

21,205 
3,931 

25,136 

20,705   
708   

21,413   

1,720   
394   

2,114   
392   

2,506   

(3,410)  
(3,208)  

(6,618)  

(437)  
335 

(102)  
(390)  

(492)  

226,482 
13,461 

239,943 
(444)

239,499 

18,792 
4,425 

23,217 
3,933 

27,150 

  $

  $

33,874 

  $

165,694 

  $

18,907    $

(6,126)   $

212,349 

33,874 

  $

167,569 

  $

18,591    $

(3,308)   $

216,726 

Estimated
depreciation
expenses

4,271 
4,271 
4,271 
165,662 

  $

178,475 

F - 21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
 
   
  
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 4:-

OTHER ASSETS, NET

Cost:

At January 1, 2017
Additions
Disposals

At December 31, 2017
Additions
Disposals

At December 31, 2018

Accumulated amortization:

At January 1, 2017
Amortization charge for the year
Disposals

At December 31, 2017
Amortization charge for the year
Disposals

At December 31, 2018

Other assets, net:

At December 31, 2018

At December 31, 2017

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Above, below 
market value of 
in-place leases  

Currency
translation
adjustment

Total

  $

  $

1,524 
- 
(315)  

1,209 
- 

(1,062)  

147 

1,307 
120 
(346)  

1,081 

(6)  
(1,062)  

13 

(82)   $
55 
(31)  

(58)  
- 
(12)  

(70)  

(110)  
40 
- 

(70)  
(7)  
- 

(77)  

  $

  $

134 

  $

128 

  $

7 

  $

12 

  $

1,442 
55 
(346)

1,151 
- 
(1,074)

77 

1,197 
160 
(346)

1,011 
(13)
(1,062)

(64)

141 

140 

Intangible assets consist of lease contracts with tenants deriving from the purchase of a building complex in Geneva in 2011 and purchase of retail portfolio in Germany. See Note 
1b(1).

Estimated amortization expenses by years are as follows:

Year

2019
2020
2021
2022 and thereafter

F - 22

Estimated
amortization
 expenses  

(19)
- 
33 
127 

141 

  $

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
 
   
  
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 5:-

OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND PREPAID EXPENSES

Prepaid expenses
Income receivable
Others

NOTE 6:-

LONG-TERM DEPOSITS

Bonds deposit (1)
Restricted account (2)
SWAP (3)
Other

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

  $

  $

  $

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

32 
143 
145 

320 

  $

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

1,755 
320 
313 
89 

  $

2,477 

  $

367 
95 
44 

506 

1,897 
519 
986 
81 

3,483 

(1)
(2)
(3)

Bonds deposit of one payment of principal and interest reserves. See Note 10.
Restricted amount of $ 320 related to the hedging transaction, see details (3) below.
Hedging of cross currency interest rate swap transaction for the total amount of approximately NIS 34,200 at fixed interest rate of 6.7% in exchange for approximately $ 8,700 
at fixed interest rate of 7.95% with semi-annually payments commencing on June 2016 through December 2021, the termination date. As of December 31, 2018 the hedging 
amount is $ 4,357.

NOTE 7:-

INVESTMENTS IN COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATES

a.

On October 12, 2012, the Company acquired through its subsidiary beneficial interests in Two Penn Center Plaza in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This investment is accounted 
for using the equity method of accounting as the Company's indirect beneficial interest in Two Penn Center Plaza is 22.16% and therefore is considered to be more than 
minor.

Invested in equity
Distributions
Accumulated net income (loss)

Total investment

F - 23

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

  $

4,025    $
(1,087)  
486   

3,424    $

4,025 
(672)
(84)

3,269 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 7:-

INVESTMENTS IN COMPANIES AND ASSOCIATES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

b.

c.

On December 31, 2012 the Company acquired through its subsidiary Optibase Inc. approximately 4% indirect beneficial interest in a portfolio of shopping centers located in 
Texas,  USA  in  consideration  for  $ 4,000  which  accounted  for  the  cost  method  of  accounting.  The  Company  believes  that  its  beneficial  interests  in  Texas  portfolio  are 
considered to be so minor that they create virtually no influence over the operating and financial policies of the Real Estate Asset and therefore this investment accounted 
for cost method of accounting.

On December 29, 2015, the Company  through its  subsidiary, Optibase Inc., completed an investment in 300 River Holdings, LLC, (the "Joint Venture Company") which 
beneficially  owns  the  rights  to  a  23-story  Class  A  office  building  located  at  300  South  Riverside  Plaza  in  Chicago  under  a  99  year  ground  lease  expiring  in  2114.  The 
Company  invested  $  12,900  in  exchange  for  a  thirty  percent  (30%)  interest  in  the  Joint  Venture  Company.  In  addition  to  the  Purchase  Price,  the  Company  capitalized
acquisition costs of approximately $ 242. See Note 1b(2). On June 17, 2016, and in accordance with the Company's initial investment agreement, the Company had invested 
an additional amount of $ 3,000 which accrued interest of 12% per annum, and was distributed back to the Company on November 21, 2017.

Invested in equity
Accumulated net loss

Total investment

d.

Investments in associates accounted for using the equity method of accounting:

Summarized data of the financial statements of associates, unadjusted to the Company's percentage of holdings: *)

Assets
Liabilities
Income
Net loss

*)

The information presented does not include excess cost and goodwill.

F - 24

December 31,

2018

2017

13,142    $
(6,189)  

13,142 
(2,855)

6,953    $

10,287 

December 31,

2018

2017

346,267    $
451,914    $
44,876    $
(14,669)   $

364,805 
446,335 
41,546 
(13,206)

  $

  $

  $
  $
  $
  $

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 8:-

OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Employees and payroll accruals
Accrued expenses
Government (mainly tax provision)
Advance tenants payments
Tenant security deposits
Trade payables

Total

NOTE 9:-        LONG-TERM LOANS

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

193    $

2,165   
460   
649   
125   
511   

  $

4,103    $

206 
1,406 
1,245 
684 
124 
697 

4,362 

a.

On October 29, 2009, Optibase SARL received a mortgage loan (the "Loan") from a financial institution in Switzerland, in the amount of CHF 18,800 for the purpose of 
purchasing the real estate property located in Rümlang, Switzerland (the "Property"). The loan bears a variable interest rate based on current money and capital markets in 
Switzerland  plus  the  bank's  customary  margins  0.8%.  The  financial  institution  may  increase  the  margin  at  any  time  if  creditworthiness  of  the  borrower  or  quality  of  the 
property is impaired. Principal and interest of the loan are payable quarterly. The loans are repaid at a rate of CHF 376 per year. The mortgage loan may be repaid at any time 
with a three months prior written notice by the Company. The mortgage loan is governed by the laws of Switzerland and bears other terms and conditions customary for that 
type of mortgage loans. The Company pledged to the bank the property and all accounts and assets of the Company's subsidiary which are deposited with the bank against 
the loan received. The Company is required to meet certain covenants under this mortgage loan. As of December 31, 2018, the Company met the required covenants.

Maturities of the loan by years are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019 (current maturity)

Long-term portion:

2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Total

F - 25

  $

382 

382 
382 
382 
382 
13,747 

  $

15,275 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
 
   
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 9:-

LONG-TERM LOANS (Cont.)

b.

On  October  2011,  OPCTN  and  Eldista  entered  into  a  CHF 100,000  bank  loan  refinancing  with  Credit  Suisse  for  the  above  mentioned  loan.  Under  the  new  financing 
agreement, Credit Suisse provided a new loan to OPCTN and Eldista which replaced the mortgage loan that Credit Suisse provided to Eldista. The loan bears a variable 
interest rate based on current money and capital markets in Switzerland plus the bank's customary margins, the combined interest margins rate is 0.83%. The loans are repaid 
at a rate of CHF 2,000 per year and are secured by a first mortgage over the property and by a pledge of Eldista's shares. The Company is required to meet certain covenants 
under this mortgage loan. As of December 31, 2018, the Company met these covenants.

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Maturities of the loan by years are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019 (current maturity)

Long-term portion:

2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Total

  $

2,031 

2,031 
2,031 
2,031 
2,031 
77,497 

  $

85,621 

c.

Optibase Bavaria negotiated a loan agreement with a Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank Aktiengesellschaft ("DG HYP"), for the provision of a senior mortgage 
loan  in  the  amount  of  up  to  Euro  21,000  of  which  the  Company  utilized  Euro  20,474.  The  effective  interest  rate  was  closed  at  2.15%.  The  loan  is  repaid  in  quarterly 
installments of EUR 105 each, up until April 30, 2020. The terms of the loan includes certain covenants, a debt service cover ratio requirement of between 130% and 110%, 
and a loan to value requirement of 70% in the first three years and 65% in the fourth and fifth years. As of December 31, 2018, the Company met these covenants.

Maturities of the loan by years are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019 (current maturity)

Long-term portion:

2020

Total

  $

480 

21,136 

  $

21,136 

F - 26

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
 
   
  
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
   
  
   
 
   
  
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 9:-        LONG-TERM LOANS (Cont.)

d.

On July 8, 2015, the Company subsidiary, Optibase Inc., entered into a loan agreement with City National Bank of Florida (“CNB”) for a gross amount of $ 15,000 for the 
financing of 25 condominium units the Company owns in Miami and Miami Beach, Florida.  The loan is secured by a senior mortgage over the condominium units. The loan 
was taken for a term of three (3) years, with an interest rate of Libor 30-day-rate  plus  2.65%.  Interest  is  paid  monthly  commencing  August  1,  2015,  and  the  principal  is 
reduced in six-month intervals beginning July 2016. On November 24, 2017 Optibase Inc., refinanced the loan.  Under the refinancing, the existing principle loan balance of $ 
9,390 bears an interest rate of Libor 30- day rate plus 2.65% which may be increased to 30-day Libor plus 3.25% if Optibase Inc. or its subsidiary, fail to maintain depository 
accounts with totaling $ 1,500. The principal of the Loan is amortized on a monthly basis with principal payments of approximately $ 19 per month plus accrued interest until 
the  loan  matures  on  July  8,  2020  when  all  remaining  principal  and  interest  become  due  and  payable.  The  securities  for  the  Loan  include  a  restricted  cash  deposit  of 
approximately $ 300. As of December 31, 2018 Loan issuance costs of $ 110 reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the gross amount of the loan and are 
amortized in accordance with the loan payments. The covenants under the new financing agreement are substantially the same as under the previous loan agreement. As of 
December 31, 2018, the Company met these covenants.

Maturities of the loan by years are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019 (current maturity)

Long-term portion:

2020

  $

228 

  $

8,774 

e.

For information regarding a loan received from the controlling shareholder, see note 17b(5).

NOTE 10:-

LONG-TERM BONDS

In August 2015, the Company issued gross amount of NIS 60,000 (approximately $ 15,700 as of the issue date) in aggregate principal amount of Series A Bonds bearing annual fixed 
interest of 6.7% payable in semi-annual installments on June 30 and on December 31 of each of the years 2015 through 2021, commencing on December 31, 2015 and ending on 
December 31, 2021. The principal will be repaid in semi-annual installments on June 30 and on December 31 of each of the years of 2016 through 2021, commencing on June 30, 2016 
and ending on December 31, 2021. The bonds (principal and interest) are not linked to any currency or index.

F - 27

 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
   
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 10:- LONG-TERM BONDS (Cont.)

Debt issuance costs of $ 384 reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the gross amount of the bonds according to Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2015-03
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board In April 2015. The Company elected to adopt this standard early, effective August 10, 2015. The debt issuance costs are 
amortized in accordance with the bonds payments.  As of December 31, 2018 the unamortized amount of the debt issuance costs is $ 102. The Company is required to meet certain 
covenants under this bonds. As of December 31, 2018, the Company met these covenants.

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Maturities of the bonds by years are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019 (current maturity)

Long-term portion:

2020
2021

Total

NOTE 11:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

a.

Lease commitments:

  $

2,667 

2,667 
2,572 

  $

5,239 

The Company and its subsidiaries facilities leased and motor vehicles leased under several operating lease agreements for different periods ending in 2020.

Future minimum lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2019
2020
2021

Total

b.

Assets pledged as collateral:

  $

  $

141 
110 
33 

284 

As collateral for the Company's loan mortgages, a fixed pledge has been placed on the Company's subsidiaries in Luxemburg shareholders' equity. See Note 9a.

F - 28

 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
   
  
   
   
 
   
  
   
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
   
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 11:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)

c.

Israel Innovation Authority commitments:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Until  the  sale  of  the  Video  Activity  the  Company  participated  in  programs  sponsored  by  the  Israeli  Government  and  by  the  European  Commission  for  the  support  of 
research and development activities.

The Company was obligated to pay royalties to the Israel Innovation Authority ("IIA"), in the amount of 3%-3.5% of the sales recorded from products and other related 
revenues generated from such projects, up to 100% of the grants received, linked to the U.S. dollar and for grants received after January 1, 1999 also bearing interest at the 
rate of LIBOR. The obligation to pay these royalties is contingent on actual sales of the products and in the absence of such sales, no payment is required. The Company 
was undergoing an audit by the IIA for royalties paid before the sale of the Company's Video business. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has sufficient provisions to 
cover the expected outcome of such review process. The provision for the above commitments was recorded under liabilities attributed to discontinued operations as the 
Company has no further obligation to pay royalties on revenues generated by the Video Activity subsequent to its sale.

d.

In  June  2017,  Aberdeen  Associates  LLC,  a  Delaware  limited  liability  company,  extended  a  $7,000,  5-year  fixed-rate  loan  facility  (the  “Loan  Facility”) to the Company’s
subsidiary, Optibase Inc. secured by a pledge of 100% of its membership interest in Optibase Chicago 300, LLC. The Loan Facility will bear interest at an annual rate of 5% 
of the amount drawn, and is compounded and paid quarterly until the maturity on June 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not drawn down any funds 
under the Loan Facility.

e.

Legal claims and contingent liabilities:

1. On October 26, 2014, the Company received a letter on behalf of two purported shareholders (the "Shareholders") demanding the Company to file a derivative claim 
against its controlling shareholder and directors and officers, according to procedures of the Companies Law and requesting discovery of internal documents. The 
demand alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties by directors and officers with respect to the approval of the transaction to acquire condominium units in 
Miami Beach, Florida, (the "Transaction"), in accordance with the Companies Law. The Company presented the Shareholders, at their request, with certain materials in 
connection with the Transaction for their review.

On May 12, 2015 the Company has been served with a motion to approve the filing of a derivative claim against its controlling shareholder, directors and CEO and 
against certain former controlling shareholder and directors, (the "Motion").

The Claim alleges, among other things, a breach of fiduciary duties by the Company directors, officers and controlling shareholder, and an exploitation of a business 
opportunity  by  the  Company  current  and  former  controlling  shareholder  with  respect  to  certain  private  placements  of  the  Company's  shares  to  its  controlling 
shareholder.

F - 29

 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 11:-

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

The Claim further alleges, that such private placements constitute a prohibited distribution as the shares were issued for an unfair consideration. As a result of the 
above, the Applicants request the Court to allow them to continue with this derivative claim and ultimately to require all the defendants to pay the Company an 
aggregate amount of approximately $ 41,900, as well as required the Companies shareholder (current and former) to pay to the Company approximately $ 2,800 plus 
interest (for the exploitation of a business opportunity). The Applicants further require reimbursement of expenses, legal fees and award to the Applicants.

On November 8, 2015, The Company has submitted its response to the Motion and Claim together with an expert opinion. The Company has raised several arguments 
against the Motion including, inter alia, preliminary claims to dismiss the Motion in-limine. On November 13, 2015, the directors, CEO and former directors submitted 
their response to the Motion.

On September 6, 2016, the Applicants submitted to the District Court their answer to the Company's response to the motion to approve the filing of a derivative claim, 
together with an expert opinion.

On October 30, 2016, a pre-trial hearing was held during which the Court gave instruction regarding the scope of disclosure that the Company needs to discover.

On March 14, 2017 the Company, the Company's directors, CEO and former directors' submitted an expert opinion as a response to the expert opinion submitted by 
the Applicants.

On May 29, 2017 our controlling shareholder submitted an expert opinion as a response to the expert opinion submitted by the Applicants.

The first cross-examination hearing was held on October 31, 2017, and additional hearings were held on November 19, 2017, December 5, 2017, February 25, 2018, 
October 7, 2018, December 2, 2018 and December 18, 2018.

The summaries submission of the Company is scheduled for March 31, 2019, and of the Applicants is scheduled for April 15, 2019. 

At this stage the Company cannot provide an assessment as to the chances of the claim and the exposure to the Company.

2.

On March 6, 2019, the Company has  notified that Swiss Pro Capital Limited, a company organized under the laws of Switzerland, has filed a legal claim against the 
Company's subsidiaries, Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l and Optibase Real Estate Europe SARL pursuant to which Swiss Pro mainly demands the exercise of a granted option to 
purchase 20% of the shares of Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l, the owner of the Rümlang property, or the Option, in connection with an option agreement between Swiss Pro 
and the Company's subsidiaries, dated March 1, 2010, or the Agreement.

F - 30

 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 11:-

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

            Swiss Pro alleges that by calculating the formula under the Agreement, the exercise price of the Option is zero, and as such Swiss Pro claims that it holds 20% of the 
shares  of  Optibase  RE  1  s.a.r.l.  as  of  May  25,  2016,  the  date  on  which  Swiss  Pro  has  informed  the  Company's  subsidiaries  about  the  exercise  of  the  Option.  In 
addition, Swiss Pro alleges that the Company's subsidiaries be ordered to carry out the actions required for the allotment of the exercisable shares, and demands that 
Optibase Real Estate Europe SARL be ordered to pay Swiss Pro an amount of CHF 450 for additional charges made since the exercise of the Option and its alleged 
stake in the cash held by Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l.

3.

4.

The filing of the legal claim was preceded by an exchange of letters between Swiss Pro and the Company during 2015 and 2016 in connection with Swiss Pro's claim 
for the exercise of the Option. The Company has responded to the allegations then raised by Swiss Pro and rejected them all (see the disclosure of such exchange of 
letters in its annual reports on Form 20-F for the years 2015 through 2017). The Company maintain its rejection of Swiss Pro's allegations and believe the legal claim to 
be without merits.

On April 16, 2015, the Company's subsidiary Eldista GmbH, filed a claim to the court in Switzerland in an amount of CHF 961 due to damages and unpaid amounts 
from a specific tenant. Shortly thereafter, the tenant filed a counterclaim against Eldista GmbH in an amount of CHF 157 for damages allegedly caused to it. The court 
suggested the parties to transfer to mediation proceedings which failed. The court handed down a partial judgment on 31, October 2016, dismissing Eldista GmbH's 
claim (though it had not yet examined the issue of the damages). Eldista GmbH filed an appeal against the judgment, but it was dismissed on June 12, 2017. On May 2, 
2018, the court ruled that the damages owned to the tenant shall amount to approximately CHF 53 plus interest 5% as of June 4, 2014. An appeal has been filed and is 
currently pending before the supreme court. Should the supreme court confirm the first judgment, Eldista GmbH will most likely have a counterclaim against the 
former real estate agency that was managing the CTN Complex, although there is also a possibility that a judge would consider that the latter committed no breach or 
that only a portion of the damage can be recovered by the agency.

At this stage, the Company cannot assess whether the supreme court will receive or dismiss the appeal.

On  March  1  2017,  the  Company's  subsidiary  Eldista  Gmbh,  received  a  notice  from  its  largest  tenant  in  Switzerland,  LEM  Switzerland  SA,  or  LEM,  regarding  the 
deposit of the monthly rent for March 2017 amounting to approximately CHF 279  vat inclusive with Banque cantonale de Genève under the control of the Pouvoir 
judiciaire of the Canton of Geneva, as a preliminary process for filing a claim with the Commission de Conciliation en Matière de Baux et Loyers of the Canton of 
Geneva, or the Commission. LEM claims that there are serious defects affecting the rented premises, which merit LEM with a reimbursement of approximately CHF 
2,400 ((excluding VAT) as well as approximately CHF 69 as indemnification for consequential damages for the years 2014 and 2015. LEM also reserves its claims 
regarding damages suffered before year 2014.

F - 31

 
 
 
 
 
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 11:-

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont.)

On April 5, 2017 LEM withdrew the deposit of the monthly rent for March 2017 with Banque cantonale de Genève under the control of the Pouvoir judiciaire of the 
Canton of Geneva and released the amount to the Company. Thus, paying the full payment of the rent.

Based on LEM’s submissions filed during the first hearing before the court, LEM is requesting a 20% rent reduction amounting to a capital amount of CHF 3,094for 
the period starting from  February 1, 2012, until June 30, 2017, with 5% moratory interest per year starting from October 23, 2017, corresponding to approximately 
CHF 154 per year, based on the various defects allegedly affecting the rented premises. In addition, LEM is claiming for related damages an amount of approximately 
CHF 168, subject to amplification, with 5% moratory interest per year starting from October 23, 2017. LEM’s claim for rent reduction was reduced to 10% from July 1, 
2017, until repair of the alleged defects or entry into force of the judgment, that is to say a capital amount of approximately CHF 286 if considered from July 1, 2017, 
until June 31, 2018. LEM further demands to be reserved the right to claim the reimbursement of overpaid ancillary fees. A first hearing took place on June 26, 2018, 
before the first instance court for lease matters, and a second hearing took place on November 7, 2018. The next hearing (personal appearance of the parties and 
witness hearing) could be appointed by the court, which is not likely to happen before end of March 2019, or even after Easter, depending on the agenda of the court.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has sufficient provisions to cover the expected outcome of this claim.

NOTE 12:-     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

a.

Recurring fair value measurements:

The  fair  value  of  the  interest  rate  swaps  is  based  on  the  estimated  amount  the  Company  would  receive  or  pay  to  terminate  the  contract  at  the  reporting  date  and  is 
determined using interest rate pricing models and observable inputs.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has an interest rate swap agreements for Optibase Bavaria loan. The fair value of the interest rate swap consisted of a 
liability of $ 206 and $ 294, respectively, is included in long-term liabilities, and the net unrealized income on the Company interest rate swap is included in accumulated other 
comprehensive loss.

The fair value of the currency swaps is based on the estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contract at the reporting date and is determined 
using currency rate pricing models and observable inputs.

As of December 31, 2018 and  2017, the Company has a currency rate swap agreements for Optibase Series A bonds. The fair value of the currency rate swap consisted of an 
assets of $ 313 and $ 986, respectively.

F - 32

 
 
 
 
OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 12:-

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Cont.)

b.

Valuation methods:

In accordance with ASC 820, the Company measures its interest rate swap derivative instruments at fair value using the market approach valuation technique. The fair value 
of interest rate swap derivative instruments is classified within Level 2 value hierarchy, as the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices.

NOTE 13:-     TAXES ON INCOME

a.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA").  The TCJA makes 
broad and complex changes to the Code. The changes include, but are not limited to:

1.
2.

3.
4.

A corporate income federal tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 ("Rate Reduction");
The transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system by providing a 100 percent deduction to an eligible U.S. shareholder on 
foreign sourced dividends received from a foreign subsidiary;
A one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017; and
Taxation of GILTI earned by foreign subsidiaries beginning after December 31, 2017. The Global Intangible Low-Taxed Icome GILTI tax imposes a tax on foreign 
income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations.

In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118), which allowed the 
Company to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. As a result, a provisional estimate of the effect 
of  the  Tax  Act  was  recorded  in  the  2017  financial  statements.  During  the  preparation  of  the  2018  income  tax  provision,  the  analysis  was  completed  and  no  additional 
adjustments were recorded.

b.

Corporate tax rates:

Israeli companies are generally subject to corporate tax on their taxable income. As of 2018, the corporate tax rate is 23% (in 2017 and 2016, the corporate tax rate was 24% 
and 25%, respectively).

In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget 
Years), 2016 which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1, 2017 and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018. Capital gains 
derived by an Israeli company are subject to the prevailing corporate tax rate.

F - 33

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 13:-     TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)

Taxable income of the Company's subsidiary in Luxemburg, Switzerland and the United States may be subject to the following statutory federal (approximate) tax rates:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Luxemburg
Switzerland
United States
Germany

c.

Tax assessments:

The Company has final tax assessments through the tax year 2013.

d.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities:

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2018

2016

29%   
24%   
21%   
16%   

29%   
24%   
34%   
16%   

29%
24%
34%
16%

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the 
amounts used for income tax purposes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities mainly derive from the acquisitions of commercial buildings in Switzerland. The deferred taxes are computed at the average tax rate of 24%, 
based on the corporate income tax in Switzerland, which is the tax rate that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

Significant components of the Company and its subsidiary deferred tax assets are as follows:

Deferred tax assets:

Net Operating losses
Lease provision

Other

Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Land
Building
Other

Deferred tax liabilities

Valuation allowance

Deferred tax liabilities, net

F - 34

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

25,892    $

1,472   
196   

27,560   

(5,362)  
(10,058)  
(2,571)  

(17,991)  

(23,321)  

24,972 

1,511 
203 

26,686 

(5,408)
(10,344)
(605)

(16,357)

(24,371)

  $

(13,752)   $

(14,042)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
    
 
  
   
 
 
   
    
 
  
   
    
 
  
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
    
 
  
   
 
 
   
    
 
  
   
 
 
   
    
 
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 13:-     TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)

e.

Net operating losses carry-forward:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Through December 31, 2018, Optibase Ltd. had net operating losses carry-forward for tax purposes in Israel of approximately $ 61,000 which may be carried forward and 
offset against taxable income in the future, for an indefinite period.

As of December 31, 2018, Optibase Inc. had U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $ 47,000 that can be carried forward and offset against taxable 
income  for  20  years,  no  later  than  2038.  Utilization  of  U.S.  net  operating  losses  may  be  subject  to  the  substantial  annual  limitation  due  to  the  "change  in  ownership" 
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses before utilization. 
Based  upon  the  weight  of  available  evidence,  which  includes  the  Company's  historical  operating  performance  and  the  recorded  cumulative  net  losses  in  all  prior  fiscal 
periods, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against it Israeli and U.S deferred tax assets.

f.

Reconciliation of the theoretical tax expenses to the actual tax expenses:

A  reconciliation  between  the  theoretical  tax  expense,  assuming  all  income  is  taxed  at  the  statutory  tax  rate  applicable  to  the  income  of  the  Company  and  the  actual  tax 
expense as reported in the statements of operations is as follows:

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2018

2016

Income before taxes as reported

  $

3,525 

  $

4,451    $

4,070 

Theoretical tax benefit computed at the statutory rate 23%, 24% and 25% for the years 2018, 2017 and 2016, 

respectively

Income tax at rate other than the Ltd. statutory tax rate
Tax adjustments in respect of currency translation
Adjustment of deferred tax balances following a decrease in statuary tax rates
Deferred taxes on losses and other temporary differences for which valuation allowance was provided
Taxes for previous years
Other non-deductible expenses

811 
52 
2 
- 
446 
47 
106 

1,068   
(226)  
33   
4,225   
(3,600)  
(80)  
182   

Income tax expense

  $

1,464 

  $

1,602    $

1,018 
(163)
86 
1,229 
(638)
- 
95 

1,627 

F - 35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 13:- TAXES ON INCOME (Cont.)

f.

Income before taxes on income consists of the following:

Domestic
Foreign

g.

Income tax expenses are comprised as follows:

Current
Deferred

Domestic
Foreign

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2018

(2,515)   $
6,040 

(84)   $

4,535   

3,525 

  $

4,451    $

2016

(1,239)
5,309 

4,070 

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2018

2016

1,637 
  $
(173)    

1,771    $
(169)  

1,464 

  $

1,602    $

  $

- 
1,464 

-    $

1,602   

1,464 

  $

1,602    $

1,801 
(174)

1,627 

- 
1,627 

1,627 

  $

  $

  $

  $

  $

  $

h.

As of December 31, 2018, the total amount of gross unrecognized benefits was $560, none of which would have an impact on our effective tax rate, if recognized.

NOTE 14:-

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

a.

General:

1.

The Ordinary shares of the Company are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market since April 1999 and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. Since April 2015.

Ordinary shares confer on their holders the right to receive notice to participate and vote in general meetings of the Company, the right to a share in excess assets 
upon liquidation of the Company and the right to receive dividends, if declared.

2.

On December 31, 2013 following the approval of the Company board of directors and the approval of the Company shareholders, the Company issued a net sum of 
1,300,580  ordinary  shares  in  consideration  for  the  purchase  of  twelve  luxury  condominium  units  in  Miami  Beach,  Florida  from  a  private  companies  indirectly 
controlled by Capri, The Company's controlling shareholder. See Note 1b(1).

F - 36

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 14:-

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Cont.)

b.

Stock options:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

In 1999, the Company adopted an Israeli Option Plan ("1999 Israeli option plan"), and a U.S. Option Plan ("1999 U.S. option plan") (collectively, the "1999 plans"). Under the 
terms of the above option plans, options may be granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants. The options generally become exercisable monthly over a four-
year period, commencing one year after date of the grant, subject to the continued employment of the employee. The options generally expire no later than seven years from 
the date of the grant.

In May 2003 the Company amended its 1999 Plan to provide for the grant of options to Israeli optionees under Section 102 of the Israeli Tax Ordinance.

The exercise price of the options granted under the above mentioned plans may not be less than the nominal value of the shares into which such options are exercised. Any 
options, which are forfeited or cancelled before expiration, become available for future grants.

The total number of options available for future grants as of December 31, 2018 was 571,260.

A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information, is as follows:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Granted
Forfeited
Exercised

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable options at end of year

Options vested and expected to vest at end of year

Year ended
December 31, 2018

Weighted
average exercise 
price

Amount

  $

62,000 
- 
(60,000)   $
(2,000)   $

- 

- 

- 

9.93   

10   
7.97   

-   

-   

-   

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual term 
(years)

0.83 

- 

- 

- 

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the Company's closing stock value as of December 31, 2018 and the exercise price, 
multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2018. 
This amount may change based on the fair market value of the Company's stock. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the total intrinsic value of outstanding options was $ 0.

F - 37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
    
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
 
   
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 14:-     SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

As of December 31, 2018, the compensation cost related to options granted under the Company's stock option plans were fully recognized.

c.

Non-vested shares:

In May 2006, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2006 Israeli Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2006 Plan"). The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of 
options, restricted shares and restricted share units in accordance with various Israeli tax tracks.

The Company currently uses the 2006 Plan for the grant of restricted shares only.

The restricted shares are granted at no consideration and with a vesting schedule of two years (50% each year). The restricted shares are granted in accordance with the 
Israeli capital gains tax track. In November 2013 and in August 2014, the Company's board of directors approved the increase of 50,000 shares and 150,000 shares under the 
2006 Plan.

As of December 31, 2018 an aggregate sum of 235,790 ordinary shares has been reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan, respectively.

A summary of the status of the entity's restricted shares as of December 31, 2018, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2018, is presented below:

Restricted shares

Non-vested at January 1, 2018

Granted
Vested

Non-vested at December 31, 2018

Weighted
average grant 
date fair value  

Shares

4,000    $

-   

(4,000)   $

-   

7.47 

7.47 

- 

As of December 31, 2018, the compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees under the Plan were fully recognized.

d.

The total equity-based compensation expense related to all of the Company's equity-based awards, recognized for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, was 
comprised as follows:

General and administrative

- 

15   

60 

Year ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

F - 38

 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
 
   
 
   
    
 
  
   
 
  
   
 
   
    
 
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 15:- FINANCIAL EXPENSES, NET

Financial income (expenses):

Interest
Re-measurement of derivatives
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Other

NOTE 16:- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Summary information about geographic areas:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

2018

  $

Year ended
December 31,
2017

2016

(2,827)   $
(562)  
507 
- 

(3,143)   $
616 
(565)  
323 

  $

(2,882)   $

(2,769)   $

(3,170)
22 
(218)
- 

(3,366)

The Company manages its business on a basis of one reportable segment (see Note 1 for a brief description of the Company activity). The data is presented in accordance with 
ASC 280, "Segment Reporting". Revenues in the table below are attributed to geographical areas based on the location of the end customers.

The following present total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and real estate property as of December, 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

2018

2017

2016

  Total revenues  

Real estate
property, net

  Total revenues  

Real estate
property, net

  Total revenues    

Real estate
property, net

Switzerland
Germany
United States

  $

  $

12,322 
3,261 
1,025 

  $

162,706 
30,736 
18,907 

  $

12,288 
3,268 
1,031 

  $

165,981 
32,152 
18,593 

12,104    $
3,338   
896   

160,089 
28,864 
18,737 

  $

16,608 

  $

212,349 

  $

16,587 

  $

216,726 

  $

16,338    $

207,690 

F - 39

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
   
  
 
 
  
   
    
 
  
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 17:- MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

a.

Controlling shareholders:

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

To the Company's knowledge there are no arrangements, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company. To the best of The 
Company's knowledge, the Company's controlling shareholder, the Capri Family Foundation, holds approximately 73% of the Company's ordinary shares.

b.

Related party transactions:

1.

2.

On December 19, 2013, and following the approval of the Company's audit committee, compensation committee, board of directors, and the Company's shareholders 
the Company approved the compensation terms of Mr. Shlomo (Tom) Wyler, for his service as Chief Executive Officer of the Company's subsidiary Optibase Inc. The 
yearly gross base salary will be $ 170 as well as reimbursement of health insurance expenses of up to $ 24 per year, and including reimbursement of reasonable work-
related expenses incurred up to $ 50 per year. On May 16, 2016, following the approval by the Company's compensation committee, audit committee and board of 
directors, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment to Mr. Wyler's compensation terms in a manner that Mr. Wyler's annual gross base salary shall be $ 
200 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2016, as well as reimbursement of health insurance expenses of up to $ 24 per year, and including reimbursement of 
reasonable work-related expenses incurred as part of his activities as Chief Executive Officer of Optibase Inc., of up to $ 50 per year. On February 14, 2019, following 
the approval by the Company's compensation committee, audit committee and board of directors, the Company's shareholders approved an extension for a 3 year 
term, of the engagement with Mr. Wyler's, including an adjustment to his compensation terms, in a manner that Mr. Wyler's annual gross base salary was set at 
$220,000 for a full time position, as of January 1, 2019.

On December 19, 2013, and following the approval Of the Company's audit committee, board of directors, and the Company's shareholders approved the a service 
agreement  between  the  Company  and  Mr.  Reuwen  Schwarz,  currently  serves  also  as  a  member  of  the  Company's  board  of  directors,  who  is  a  relative  of  the 
beneficiaries of Capri, the Company's controlling shareholder, for the provision of real estate related consulting services in consideration for a monthly fee of € 4 plus 
applicable value added tax (if applicable) and reimbursement for expenses incurred up to € 12 per year. On December 29, 2016, and following the approval by the 
Company's audit committee and board of directors, the Company's shareholders approved the extension of Mr. Schwarz' service agreement, which will be in effect 
retroactively from November 1, 2016 for a period of three years. Each of Mr. Schwarz and the Company may terminate the service agreement by giving a prior written 
notice of 30 days. During such advance notice period, Mr. Schwarz will be required to continue the provision of the services provided by him under the agreement 
(unless the Company have instructed him otherwise) and in any event Mr. Schwarz will be entitled to receive the consideration for such period, except for cause.

F - 40

 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 17:- MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Cont.)

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

3.

4.

5.

6.

On October 22, 2014, following the approval by the Company's audit committee and board of directors the Company's shareholders approved the entrance into a 
registration rights agreement with Mr. Shlomo (Tom) Wyler and Capri, for the filing of a registration statement in order to register for resale all of the Company's 
Ordinary shares held by them. As of December 31, 2018 registration has not been implemented yet.

On  December  29,  2016,  the  Company's  shareholders  approved,  following  the  approval  by  the  Company's  audit  committee  and  board  of  directors,  a  new  lease 
agreement to be entered into with an affiliate of Capri, or the Tenant. The new lease will be in effect for a one-year term commencing on January 2, 2017, which will be 
automatically extended by a one-year term and up to a total of three years. The Tenant may decide not to extend the New Lease provided that it has given notice to 
that effect to the Company at least 45 days before the end of each year. The monthly rent to be paid by the Tenant to the Company is $ 25, including sales tax. The 
Rent will be increased by 3% every year.

In March 2017, the Company's audit committee and board of directors approved, in accordance with the Israeli Companies Regulations (Relieves for Transactions 
with Interested Parties) of 2000, the receipt of a $ 5,118 loan, (the "Loan"), from the Company's controlling shareholder. The Loan was granted to the Company on 
March 28, 2017 for the purpose of strengthening the Company's liquidity. The Loan does not bear any interest or linkage differentials and is unsecured. In May 2018, 
the parties entered into an amendment to the Loan's agreement, under which the Company reapid the Company's controlling shareholder $2.5 million on account of 
the Loan's account. The repayment by the Company of the remaining Loan's amount of approximately $2.6 million has been postponed from April 1, 2019 to April 1, 
2020, however, the Company may prepay the Loan prior to such date at its sole discretion without any penalty. The loan was recognized at fair value to reflect its 
interest beneficiary terms at the date of the transaction. The difference between the fair value and the loan principal, in the amount of $ 372 is reported as a reserve 
from transaction with controlling shareholder in the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2018 an amount of $ 133 was recorded as a finance expense and an amount of 
$ 142 is reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the gross amount of the loan and will be amortized throughout the duration of the loan.

In December 2017, following the approval of the Company’s board of directors and compensation committee, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment to 
the Company’s undertaking to indemnify Mr. Shlomo (Tom) Wyler, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s subsidiary Optibase Inc. who is affiliated with the 
controlling shareholder of the Company; and  Mr. Reuwen Schwarz, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, who is affiliated with the controlling shareholder 
of the Company, to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law and our articles of association. The aggregate indemnification amount shall not exceed the 
higher of: (i) 25% of the Company shareholders’ equity, as set forth in the Company’s financial statements prior to such payment; or (ii) $20 million.

F - 41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)

NOTE 18:-

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

OPTIBASE LTD. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

On March 6, 2019, the Company has notified that Swiss Pro Capital Limited, a company organized under the laws of Switzerland, has filed a legal claim against the Company 
subsidiaries, Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l and Optibase Real Estate Europe SARL pursuant to which Swiss Pro mainly demands the exercise of a granted option to purchase 20% of the 
shares of Optibase RE 1 s.a.r.l, the owner of the Rümlang property, or the Option, in connection with an option agreement between Swiss Pro and the Company subsidiaries, 
dated March 1, 2010. (for further details see Note 11e(2)).

F - 42

 
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2018

F - 43

 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
 (a Delaware limited liability company)

Contents

Consolidated Financial Statements
      Report of Independent Certified Public Accountant

Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated statements of members’ deficit for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Notes to consolidated financial statements

F - 44

Page

F - 45
F - 46
                         F - 47
F - 48
                        F - 49
F - 50

 
 
 
 
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To The Members of
300 River Holdings LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 300 River Holdings LLC (the "Company") as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements").  In our opinion, 
the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits.  We are a 
public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States)  ("PCAOB")  and  are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in 
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over 
financial  reporting.   As  part  of  our  audits,  we  are  required  to  obtain  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the 
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to 
those  risks.   Such  procedures  included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  regarding  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial  statements.   Our  audits  also  included  evaluating  the 
accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  presentation  of  the  financial  statements.   We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ EISNERAMPER LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011.

New York, New York
March 28, 2019

F - 45

 
300 River Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

ASSETS

Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
Cash
Segregated cash and other escrows
In-place and other lease values, net of accumulated amortization of
     $38,752,061 and $38,046,694, respectively.
Tenant account receivable
     Current
     Unbilled straight-line rent
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of
     $6,496,670 and $4,681,639, respectively.

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT

Lease financing obligation, less unamortized value of deferred lease
     financing costs of $8,874,841 and $8,968,193, including accrued
     interest of $2,866,379 and $2,088,884, respectively.

Mortgage payable, net of unamortized deferred financing costs of
      $2,394,103 and $3,056,305, respectively
Notes payable
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
Below market lease values, net of accumulated amortization of
      $47,043,159 and $46,526,230, respectively

Members' deficit

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F - 46

December 31, 
2018

December 31, 
2017

  $

  $

215,113,786 
6,078,386 
29,707,831 
710,354 

205,954,819 
1,600,282 
60,021,513 
1,415,721 

309,695 
10,657,818 
116,622 

735,524 
9,020,360 
260,315 

20,375,889 

17,459,273 

  $

283,070,381 

  $

296,467,807 

  $

213,991,538 

  $

213,120,691 

172,605,897 

171,943,695 

3,200,000 
8,014,555 

- 
6,316,762 

1,334,038 

1,850,967 

399,146,028 

393,232,115 

(116,075,647)  

(96,764,308)

  $

283,070,381 

  $

296,467,807 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
300 River Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations
For The Years Ended December 31,

Revenue:

Base rent
Escalation and other income
Amortization of aquired below market leases

Expenses:

Depreciation and amortization
Operating expenses
Real estate taxes
Management fees

Operating income

Interest including amortization of deferred financing costs of $755,554, $93,350, and $93,350, 
     respectively and related party interest of $14,729, $3,693,394, and $3,129,229 respectively.

Net loss

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F - 47

2018

2017

2016

  $

  $

19,912,661 
12,429,451 
516,929 

  $

16,356,447 
12,268,628 
520,668 

15,379,671 
15,012,537 
3,288,769 

32,859,041 

29,145,743 

33,680,977 

12,375,251 
12,844,531 
4,188,424 
1,068,504 

9,974,917 
11,923,628 
6,275,477 
796,197 

11,391,330 
13,360,786 
5,680,623 
1,067,626 

30,476,710 

28,970,219 

31,500,365 

2,382,331 

175,524 

2,180,612 

(21,682,362)  

(17,688,251)  

(13,914,762)

  $

(19,300,031)   $

(17,512,727)   $

(11,734,150)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
300 River Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Consolidated Statements of Members' Deficit

Balance – December 31, 2015
Net loss
Distributions

Balance - December 31, 2016
Net loss
Contributions
Balance - December 31, 2017
Net loss
Distributions

Balance - December 31, 2018

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F - 48

  $

(67,430,037)
(11,734,150)
(190,600)

(79,354,787)
(17,512,727)
103,206 
(96,764,308)
(19,300,031)
(11,308)

  $

(116,075,647)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
300 River Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31,

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss

to net cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of below market leases
Accrued interest on notes payable
Unbilled straight-line rental income
Lease financing obligation
Bad debt expense
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Tenant accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

2018

2017

2016

  $

(19,300,031)   $

(17,512,727)   $

(11,734,150)

13,130,805 

(516,929)  
14,729 
(1,637,458)  
777,495 
- 

425,829 
143,693 
(369,200)  

10,068,269 

(520,668)  

- 

(3,412,660)  
748,099 
- 

(391,942)  
956,073 
(2,390,516)  

11,484,680 
(3,288,769)
2,400,000 
(680,417)
725,980 
743,308 

367,208 
(834,808)
751,244 

Net cash used in operating activities

(7,331,067)  

(12,456,072)  

(65,724)

Cash flows from investing activities:
   Additions to leasing costs
   Additions to real estate

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:
   Proceeds from notes payable
   Repayment of notes payable
   Proceeds from mortgage payable
   Additions to financing costs
   Distributions to members
   Contributions by members

Net cash provided by financing activities

(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and escrows
    Cash, cash equivalents and escrows at beginning of period

(4,466,356)  
(17,226,847)  

(4,435,230)  
(31,538,381)  

(4,750,682)
(5,136,943)

(21,693,203)  

(35,973,611)  

(9,887,625)

3,200,000 
- 
- 
- 

(11,308)  

- 

26,600,000 
(101,600,000)  
175,000,000 

(3,056,305)  

- 
103,206 

15,000,000 
- 
- 
- 
(190,600)
- 

3,188,692 

97,046,901 

14,809,400 

(25,835,578)  
61,621,795 

48,617,218 
13,004,577 

4,856,051 
8,148,526 

Cash, cash equivalents and escrows at end of period

  $

35,786,217 

  $

61,621,795 

  $

13,004,577 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 Interest paid

Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing activities:

Accrued additions to real estate

    Accrued additions to leasing costs

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and escrows reported within the balance sheet:

          Cash and cash equivalents
          Segregated cash and other escrows

          Total cash, cash equivalents and escrows shown in the statement of cash flows

  $

20,133,281 

  $

19,299,760 

  $

11,421,412 

  $

  $

2,649,609 

  $

557,636 

  $

862,636 

  $

292,345 

  $

- 

1,183,174 

December 31, 
2018

December 31, 
2017

December 31, 
2016

  $

  $

6,078,386 
29,707,831 

  $

1,600,282 
60,021,513 

  $

35,786,217 

  $

61,621,795 

  $

1,159,374 
11,845,203 

13,004,577 

Amounts included in segregated cash and other escrows as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 represent tenant security deposits, cash received through the Company's lockbox account and 
monies required to be set aside by the Mortgagee in connection with the Mortgage note payable. Amounts included in segregated cash and other escrows as of December 31, 2016 represent 
tenant’s security deposits, cash received through the Company's lockbox bank account, monies set aside by ownership for certain annual expenses and monies required to be set aside by 
various contractual agreements which were released during 2017.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F - 49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION

300  River  Holdings,  LLC,  a  Delaware  limited  liability  company  ("Holdings"),  was  formed  on  September  21,  2010  between  300  River  Plaza  One  LLC  (the  "70%  Member")  and  WKEM 
Riverside Member LLC (the "Original 30% Member") (collectively, the “Original Members").

Holdings owns a 100% interest in the following Subsidiaries (all Delaware single member limited liability companies):

•
•
•

South Riverside Building LLC (the "Building LLC")
South Riverside Mezz LLC (the “Mezz LLC”)
300 Riverside Master Lease LLC (the “Master Lease LLC”)

Holdings and Subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the Company. The purpose of the Company is to acquire, own, and operate a commercial office building and all related tangibles 
and intangibles at 300 South Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL (the "Property").

In a transaction accounted for as a purchase business combination (see Note B[6]) on December 29, 2010 (the "Closing Date"), the Building LLC acquired the Property and South Riverside 
(the “Rights LLC”) acquired the related land, which was then leased to Building LLC for $190 million, including the assumption of the existing mortgage notes on the land of approximately 
$24 million. The Company incurred closing costs of approximately $3.1 million in connection with this transaction, which were expensed.

On February 10, 2015 (the "Sale Date"), the Company through Rights LLC, it’s wholly owned subsidiary, sold the Property for $220 million and simultaneously re- leased the Property (See 
Note F with respect to the accounting for this transaction as a financing).

On  December  28,  2015  (the  "Interest  Transfer  Date")  in  connection  with  a  series  of  transactions  the  Company  admitted  a  new  member  and  redeemed  out  a  member,  resulting  in  net 
additional capital contributions of approximately $6 million. Also, on the Interest Transfer Date, the Company issued notes to the 70% and the Original 30% Member in the principal 
amounts of $42 million and $18 million, respectively, (See Note H) and made a non-cash distribution of $60 million to the Original Members.

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

[1]

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its Subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated 
in consolidation.

[2]

Use of estimates:

The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial 
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets 
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F - 50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

[3]

Concentration of credit risk:

Cash balances are insured up to a $250,000 maximum aggregate balance. The Company places its cash investments with high-credit-qualified financial institutions which account balances, 
at times, exceed the federally insured limits. The Company's policy is to maintain funds only with financial institutions which it considers reputable and where management believes that 
the risk of loss is minimal.

[4]

Deferred costs:

Deferred costs consist of fees and costs incurred to obtain the finance lease and to obtain the mortgage payable. Such costs are being amortized on the straight-line basis over the term of 
the lease (99 years) and the mortgage (5 years).  Such amortization is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Deferred leasing commissions and deferred leasing costs incurred prior to January 1, 2018 are being amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the related leases.  Such 
amortization is included in depreciation and amortization in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

[5]

Real estate:

Real estate is carried at cost. The building, building improvements and site improvements are being depreciated on the straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 40 years.  Tenant 
Improvements are being depreciated on the straight-line basis over the life of the associated tenant lease.  Machinery and Equipment are being depreciated on the straight-line basis over 
an estimated useful life of 5 years.  The leasehold interest in the platform on which the building sits is being amortized over the life of the lease (99 years).

In  accordance  with  Accounting  Standards  Codification  ("ASC")  Topic  360,  the  Real  Estate  is  evaluated  for  impairment  whenever  indicators  of  impairment  exist.  If  an  indicator  of 
impairment exists, the estimated future cash flows of the Real Estate are compared, on an undiscounted basis, to its carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying 
value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment write-down is measured based on fair value compared to carrying 
value, with fair value typically based on a discounted cash flow analysis or an income capitalization model. There were no indications of impairment for the year ended December 31, 2018.

[6]

Purchase accounting for acquisition of real estate:

In accordance with the guidelines outlined in ASC Topic 805, and based on an evaluation by the Company utilizing an independent appraisal, the estimated fair value of the Property as of 
the date of acquisition was allocated to (i) the acquired tangible assets consisting of a leasehold interest and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities consisting then of above-
market, below-market, and in-place lease values, including various lease origination costs and assumed debt at purchase was adjusted to fair value.

The fair value of the Property's acquired tangible assets is determined by valuing the Property as if it were vacant. The "as-if-vacant" value is then ascribed to land and building and all 
acquired intangibles based on fair value.

The identified intangible assets included (i) above market lease values, representing the favorable element of contractual rents in excess of prevailing market rents for certain existing 
leases; (ii) in-place lease values, representing the lost revenues during the lease-up period to achieve the Property's occupancy level at the time of acquisition; and (iii) lease origination 
costs  (legal,  marketing,  commissions,  tenant  improvements,  etc.)  that  would  have  been  incurred  to  procure  the  existing  leases.  Above  market  lease  values  were  amortized  over  the 
remaining non-cancelable lease term of such leases. In-place lease values and lease origination   costs   are   amortized   over   the   remaining   non-cancelable   lease   term   of   each    
lease.

F - 51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 [6]      Purchase accounting for acquisition of real estate (Continued):

Below market lease values, an intangible credit, represents the unfavorable element of contractual rents below prevailing market rents for existing leases. Such credit is amortized over the 
estimated remaining term of the leases, including anticipated and estimated renewal periods (approximately 10 years).

In the event a tenant vacates prior to the end of their lease term, any unamortized intangible lease values associated with such lease are written off to operations as of the date of vacancy.

[7]

Revenue recognition and unbilled straight-line rent:

In  accordance  with  ASC  Topic  820,  base  rental  revenue  generated  from  leases  is  recognized  on  a  straight-  line  basis  over  such  term.  Such  amounts  in  excess  of  amounts  currently 
receivable per the terms of the leases are reflected as unbilled straight-line rent in the accompanying balance sheet.

The Company makes estimates of the uncollectibility of its accounts receivable based on all the facts and circumstances surrounding each tenant account.  An allowance for doubtful 
accounts has been provided for tenant accounts receivable that are estimated to be uncollectable.  Once an amount is deemed uncollectible it is written off.

[8]

Income taxes:

No  provision  has  been  made  in  the  accompanying  financial  statements  for  any  liability  for  federal,  state  or  local  taxes  since  each  item  of  income,  gain  or  loss,  deduction  or  credit  is 
reportable for income tax purposes by the Company's Members.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 740-10-05, management is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination 
by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company has evaluated whether it 
has any uncertain tax positions and has determined that there are none that would materially impact the financial position of the Company.

[9]

Debt issuance costs:

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): which requires 
that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt 
discounts.

Debt issuance costs are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

[10] Subsequent events:

Management has evaluated events occurring through March 28, 2019, the date the financial statements were available for issuance.

F - 52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE C – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (the "Revenue Standard") which, as amended, is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods 
within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2017.  The Revenue Standard outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from 
contracts with customer.  In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases" (the "Leasing Standard"), which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years 
beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective approach to adoption. The effect of the Revenue Standard on real estate entities is not applicable until the Leasing 
Standard is adopted by the Company.  The Leasing Standard was amended by ASU 2018-11, "Targeted Improvements" (the "Practical Expedient Amendment") in July of 2018 by allowing 
lessors to elect to combine lease and associated nonlease components, by classes of underlying asset, in contracts meeting certain criteria.  The Company adopted the Revenue Standard 
effective January 1, 2018.  The Company adopted the Leasing Standard and applied the Leasing standard, including the Practical Expedient Amendment, retroactively to January 1, 2018.  
The  adoption  of  the  Revenue  and  Leasing  Standards,  including  the  Practical  Expedient  Amendment,  did  not  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and 
footnote disclosures.  The only future impact on the Company will be to substantially limit the lease acquisition costs that the Company may capitalize to direct brokerage commissions 
incurred upon execution of a lease.

In September 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-03, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses" (ASU 2016-03). ASU 2016-03 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses 
for  financial  assets  held.  The  update  is  effective  for  the  Company  beginning  January  1  2020.   The  Company  is  continuing  to  evaluate  this  guidance  however,  it  does  not  expect  the 
adoption of ASU 2016-03 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In  January  2017,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  2017-01,  "Business  Combinations:  Clarifying  the  Definition  of  a  Business"  (ASU  2017-01),  which  amends  guidance  that  assists  preparers  in 
evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business, likely resulting in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions.  There are 
certain  differences  in  accounting  under  these  models,  including  the  capitalization  of  transaction  expenses  and  application  of  a  cost  accumulation  model  in  an  asset  acquisition.   The 
standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods with early adoption permitted for certain transactions.  The 
Company adopted ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2018 and it did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financials statements and footnote disclosures and will not unless the 
Company acquires property.

NOTE D - REAL ESTATE

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company's real estate consisted of the following:

Leasehold interest
Building and improvements
Tenant improvements
Equipment

Less: accumulated depreciation

F - 53

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

25,310,232    $
175,272,024     
79,497,251     
1,729,420     

25,310,232 
171,427,267 
64,328,188 
1,729,420 

281,808,927     

262,795,107 

(66,695,141)    

(56,840,288)

  $

215,113,786    $

205,954,819 

 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
     
 
   
   
   
 
   
      
  
 
   
 
   
      
  
   
 
   
      
  
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE E - DEFERRED LEASING COSTS AND OTHER LEASE INTANGIBLES

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company's deferred leasing costs consisted of the following:

In-place and other lease intangibles

Less: accumulated amortization

Below market lease values

Less: accumulated amortization

Amortization for the next five years is as follows:

Year Ending December 31, 2018  
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

NOTE F - LEASE FINANCING OBLIGATION

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

39,462,415    $

39,462,415 

(38,752,061)    

(38,046,694)

  $

710,354    $

1,415,721 

December 31,

2018

2017

  $

(48,377,197)   $

(48,377,197)

47,043,159     

46,526,230 

  $

(1,334,038)   $

(1,850,967)

In-Place and 
Other Lease 
Intangibles    

Below Market
Value Leases

486,843     
116,257     
44,484     
44,484     
18,286     

(495,931)
(274,517)
(233,748)
(233,748)
(96,094)

On February 10, 2015 (the "Sale Date"), the Company sold the Property for $220,000,000 (the "Obligation Principal") and simultaneously entered into a related lease (the “Lease”) through
February  2114  (the  "Maturity  Date").  The  Lease  requires  minimum  monthly  payments  aggregating  $9,900,000  annually  (the  "Lease  Payment")  until  the  Maturity  Date.  Commencing 
February 2015, the Lease Payment shall be increased by an amount calculated by a formula, as provided in the lease agreement, which is based on the increase in CPI subject to a cap in 
certain years plus an additional $500,000 annual increase every tenth year. The proceeds of the sale were used to pay the then existing mortgage debt and accrued interest thereon with the 
balance distributed to the Members.

In accordance with ASC Topic 840, the sale of the Property was not recognized, accordingly, the Lease has been treated as a financing transaction for financial reporting purposes.  Upon 
closing  of  the  transaction,  the  Company  recorded  a  lease  financing  obligation  in  the  amount  of  the  Obligation  Principal,  net  of  the  related  costs  of  the  transaction  (approximately 
$9,242,000).  The minimum payments provided under the financing obligation results in an effective interest rate of 4.81% thru January 31, 2016, 4.84% thru January 31, 2017, 4.92% thru 
January 31, 2018, 5.02% thru January 31, 2019 and 5.11% thereafter, as a result of the change in CPI creating an increased minimum rent payment.  Given the current effective rate of 5.02% 
on the obligation, annual interest expense is expected to exceed the payment requirements through approximately the 40th anniversary of the Lease.  For the years ended December 31, 
2018, 2017 and 2016 the required minimum rent payments made by the Company were approximately $10,376,000, $10,162,000, and $9,966,000 respectively.  Total interest expense for the 
lease financing obligation for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $11,153,000, $10,910,000, and $10,692,000 respectively.

F - 54

 
 
 
                                                                                                                        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
     
 
 
   
      
  
   
 
   
      
  
 
 
   
      
  
 
 
 
 
   
     
 
 
   
      
  
 
   
      
  
   
 
   
      
  
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE G – MORTGAGE PAYABLE

A-Note
B-Note
Mezz Note

Less: unamortized debt issuance costs

Rate

December 31, 
2018
100,000,000    $
50,000,000     
25,000,000     
175,000,000     

4.61%*  $
5.80%*   
8.46%*   

2017
100,000,000 
50,000,000 
25,000,000 
175,000,000 

(2,394,103)    
172,605,897    $

(3,056,305)
171,943,695 

  $

              *   The weighted average interest rate for the notes is 5.50% per annum

[1]       Senior notes:

On November 20, 2017 (the "Mortgage Closing Date"), the Building LLC (the "Senior Borrower") entered into a loan agreement (the "Senior Note Agreement") with unrelated lenders (the 
"Senior Lenders") to borrow a principal amount of $150,000,000 (the "Senior Notes").

The Senior Notes, which are collateralized by the building and an assignment of its rent and leases, mature on November 6, 2022 (the "Mortgage Maturity Date"), at which time the entire 
principal is due and payable. The Senior Notes require monthly payments of interest only equal to the rates reflected above per annum (based on a 360-day year) until the Maturity Date.  
The Senior Notes are also jointly and severally guaranteed by individuals affiliated with the Members.

On  the  Mortgage  Closing  Date,  pursuant  to  the  Senior  Note  Agreement,  the  Senior  Borrower  deposited  into  escrow  reserve  accounts  approximately  (i)  $16,700,000  for  a  tenant 
improvement and leasing commission reserve, (ii) $10,623,000 for a master lease reserve, (iii) $10,358,000 for a free rent reserve, (iv) $19,372,000 for unfunded obligations related to lease in 
place at the Mortgage Closing Date, (v) $2,142,000 in real estate tax funds, (vi) $266,000 in insurance funds, (vii) $848,000 in ground rent funds and (viii) $150,000 in maintenance funds.  
Release of escrow funds for approved expenditures require the approval of the lender. The Borrower is also required to deposit funds on a monthly basis into escrow accounts for real 
estate taxes and insurance. At December 31, 2018 and 2017 the total balance of these accounts was approximately $27,968,000 and $57,662,000, respectively.

The Company can prepay the Senior Notes without penalty following the fourth anniversary of the Mortgage Closing Date.

Under the Senior Note Agreement, the Company is required to deposit all rental revenue received into a restricted account, which is under the Lender's control. At December 31, 2018 and 
2017 the balance of this account was approximately $1,740,000 and $2,409,000, respectively.

[2]       Mezz-Note:

On the Mortgage Closing Date, the Mezz LLC (the "Mezz Borrower") entered into a loan agreement (the "Mezz Note Agreement") with an unrelated lender (the "Mezz Lender") to borrow a 
principal amount of $25,000,000 (the "Mezz Note").

The Mezz Note, which is collateralized by the building and an assignment of its rent and leases, matures on the Mortgage Maturity Date, at which time its entire principal is due and 
payable. The Mezz Note requires monthly payments of interest only equal to 8.46% per annum (based on a 360-day year) until the Mortgage Maturity Date, at which time the entire 
outstanding principal amount of the note is due. The Mezz Note is also jointly and severally guaranteed by individuals affiliated with the Members.

The Company can prepay the Mezz Note without penalty following the fourth anniversary of the Mortgage Closing Date.

F - 55

 
 
 
        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
   
 
   
  
   
 
   
  
   
      
  
   
  
   
 
   
  
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE H – NOTES PAYABLE

[1]        Notes Payable - related party:

On the Interest Transfer Date, the Company issued notes to the 70% Member and the Original 30% Member in the principal amounts of $42,000,000 and $18,000,000, respectively. The 
notes  provided  for  interest  ranging  from  4%  to  12%  per  annum  through  maturity  in  December  2022.  Principal  and  interest  were  payable  from  available  cash  flow,  as  provided  in  the 
Company's operating agreement.  The notes were repaid on the Mortgage Closing Date with the funds received from the mortgage.  Total interest expense for the notes payable-related
party for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $0 and $2,169,000, and $2,400,000 respectively.

[2]       Notes Payable:

During 2016 and 2017, the Company issued notes in the amount of $41,600,000, $17,950,000 of which were to members and affiliates of the Company.  The notes provided for interest at 12 
% per annum. Principal and interest were payable from available cash flow, provided for in the Company's operating agreement.  The notes issued during 2016 and 2017 were paid off on 
the Mortgage Closing Date with the funds received from the mortgage.

During 2018, the Company issued notes in the amount of $3,200,000 to members and affiliates of the Company.  The notes provided for interest at 12% per annum through maturity in 
November  2020.   Principal  and  interest  were  payable  from  available  cash  flow,  as  provided  in  the  Company's  operating  agreement.   Total  interest  expense  for  the  notes  payable  was 
approximately  $15,000,  $3,397,000,  and  $729,000  in  2018,  2017  and  2016,  of  which  approximately  $15,000,  $1,524,000,  and  $491,000  was  with  members  and  affiliates  of  the  Company, 
respectively.

NOTE I - TENANT LEASES

[1]

[2]

Space in the Property is leased to various tenants under operating leases which generally provide for renewal options and additional rentals based on increases in real estate taxes and 
certain operating expenses.

Base rent from the two largest tenants in the Property (who collectively occupy approximately 25% of the building's rentable square footage during 2018) accounted for approximately 
36%  of  the  building's  base  rental  income  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2018.   The  leases  with  such  tenants  expire  from  April  of  2026  through  June  of  2031.   For  the  year  ended 
December 31, 2017, base rent from the five largest tenants in the Property (who collectively occupied approximately 45% of the building's rentable square footage during 2017) accounted 
for approximately 69% of the building's base rental income.  For the year ended December 31, 2016, base rent from the two largest tenants in the Property (who collectively occupied 
approximately 55% of the building's rentable square footage during 2016) accounted for approximately 44% of the building's base rental income.

[3]

As of December 31, 2018, future minimum rentals under the Company's operating leases with its tenants, for the next five years and thereafter are approximately as follows:

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

F - 56

  $

Total
20,189,000 
23,105,000 
23,554,000 
23,868,000 
23,211,000 
    126,592,000 
  $ 240,519,000 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
   
 
300 RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

NOTE J - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the years ended December, 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 the Property was managed by an affiliate of the Member (the “Manager”), pursuant to the annual management agreement, which 
renews automatically unless terminated by either party, for 3.5% of gross revenue as defined in the annual management agreement.  The Company incurred approximately $1,068,000, 
$796,000, and $1,068,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 respectively, of the property management fees with the Manager.

An affiliated party (the “Affiliate”) acting in a professional capacity provided legal services to the Property, for which the Affiliate was paid $133,000, $96,000, and $96,000 for the years 
ended December, 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 respectively.  In addition, affiliates of the Managing member were paid approximately $240,000, $201,000, $235,000 for the years ended December, 
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  These amounts are included in legal and professional fees.

Advances from affiliates represent operating expenses on behalf of the Company by and affiliate.  Such balances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand.

Pursuant to an informal arrangement the Company incurred approximately $650,000, annually, to a related entity for the estimated maintenance costs of the plenum located in the Property 
and under the Property subject to adjustment for out of pocket expenses incurred directly by the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company was reimbursed 
approximately $1,000,000 from a related entity for the maintenance costs relating to the plenum for expenses incurred in prior periods. Approximately $100,000 of this amount is included in 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2017 on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing the estimated amount of common area 
maintenance that may be due to tenants. The balance was recorded as a reduction of repairs and maintenance which is included in operating expenses on the consolidated statement of 
operations. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 the net effect of the transactions between the Company and the related entity were approximately ($425,000), ($260,000) 
and  $1,300,000  respectively,  which  are  included  in  operating  expenses  on  the  consolidated  statement  of  operations.  As  of  December  31,  2018  and  2017,  the  Company  has  recorded 
receivables of approximately $41,000 and $452,000 representing maintenance costs incurred by the Company related to the plenum due to the related entity, which are included in tenant 
accounts receivable - current on the consolidated balance sheet.

On December 20, 2018 a non-related party was contracted to assume all responsibilities previously held with the related entity for the estimated maintenance costs of the plenum located in 
the Property and under the Property subject to an adjustment for out of pocket expenses incurred directly by the Company.

NOTE K – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Through March 28, 2019 the Company borrowed $3,800,000 evidenced by notes of which $3,280,000 was borrowed from members and affiliates of the Company under substantially the 
same terms as described in Note H[2].

F - 57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its 

SIGNATURES

behalf.

Date: March 28, 2019

OPTIBASE LTD.

By:   /s/ Amir Philips

Name: Amir Philips
Title: Chief Executive Officer

- 94 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit Number
1.1

1.2

4.1

4.2

4.3
4.4

4.5
4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

4.13

4.14

4.15

EXHIBIT INDEX

Description of Document
Amended and Restated Memorandum of Association of Optibase Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Report on Form 6-K dated February 19, 
2002).
Amended and Restated Articles of Association of Optibase Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 20-F dated April 30, 
2014).
Form of Letter of Indemnification between Optibase, Inc. and its directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
1999 Israel Share Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 
31, 1999).
102 Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).
2003 Amendment to the 1999 Israel Share Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.(c).9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 
December 31, 2003).
2006 Israeli Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-137644)).
Agreement between Optibase RE 1 SARL and Basler Kantonalbank dated October 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009)
Framework Agreement between Eldista GmbH and CREDIT SUISSE AG dated October 6, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011).
Security Agreement between Eldista GmbH and CREDIT SUISSE AG dated October 6, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011).
Framework Agreement between OPCTN S.A. and CREDIT SUISSE AG dated October 6, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011).
Deed  of  Pledge  Agreement  between  OPCTN  S.A.  and  CREDIT  SUISSE  AG  dated  October  6,  2011 (incorporated  by  reference  to  Exhibit  4.10  to  the  Registrant’s Annual 
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011)
Shareholders  Agreement  between  The  Phoenix  Pension  and  Provident  Fund  Ltd.,  The  Phoenix  Insurance  Company  Ltd.,  and  Optibase  Ltd.  Dated  February  28,  2011 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015).
Purchase and Transfer Agreement between Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG, Lincoln Dreizehnte Deutche Grundstucksgellschaft mbH and Lincoln Land Passau GmbH, 
dated December 18, 2014 (unofficial English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 
December 31, 2014).
Purchase and Sale Agreement between Optibase FMC, LLC and Flamingo South Acquisitions, LLC, dated September 16, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to 
the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014).
Loan Agreement between Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co KG, and Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank Aktiengesellschaft, dated May 4, 2015 (unofficial English 
translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015).
First Amendment to the Loan Agreement between Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co KG, and  Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank Aktiengesellschaft (dated May 4, 
2015), dated November 10, 2015 (unofficial English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 2015).

- 95 -

 
Exhibit Number
4.16

4.17

4.18

4.19

4.22

4.23*
6.1

8.1*
11.1

12.1*

12.2*

13.1*
13.2*
15.1*
15.2*
101*

Description of Document
Contribution Agreement between Optibase Chicago 300 LLC, 300 River Holdings LLC, 300 River Plaza One LLC and WKEM Riverside Member LLC, dated December 28, 
2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015).
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of 300 River Holdings LLC between Optibase Chicago, LLC and 300 River Plaza One LLC, dated December 28, 
2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015).
Loan Agreement between Optibase Real Estate Miami, LLC and City National Bank of Florida, dated July 1, 2015 as amended on November 17, 2017 (incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017).
Deed of Trust for Series A Bonds between Optibase Ltd. and Hermetic Trust (1975) Ltd., dated August 2, 2015 (unofficial English translation) (incorporated by reference to 
Exhibit 4.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015).
Registration Rights Agreement between Optibase Ltd., The Capri Family Foundation and Mr. Shlomo (Tom) Wyler, dated September 4, 2014 (incorporated by reference to 
Exhibit 4.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014).
Compensation Policy of Optibase Ltd.
Form of Letter of Indemnification between Optibase, Ltd. and its directors and officers, as Amended on December 21, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.1 to the 
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017).
List of the subsidiaries of Optibase Ltd. 
Code  of  Business  Conduct  and  Ethics,  as  last  adopted  by  Optibase  Ltd.  Board  of  directors  on  September  5,  2016  (incorporated  by  reference  to  Exhibit  11.1  to  the 
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016)
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)  or  Rule  15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification  by  Chief  Financial  Officer  pursuant  to  Rule  13a-14(a)  or  Rule  15d-14(a)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  302  of  the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Consent of Kost, Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global.
Consent of EisnerAmper LLP Accountants and Advisors.
The  following  financial  information  from  Optibase  Ltd.'s  Annual  Report  on  Form  20-F  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2018,  formatted  in  XBRL  (eXtensible  Business 
Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 
2017 and 2016; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in 
Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 
2016; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Filed herewith

- 96 -

 
 
 
 
COMPENSATION POLICY

OPTIBASE LTD.

Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Directors

(As Adopted by the Shareholders on February 14, 2019)

Exhibit 4.23

 
 
 
 
 
A. Overview and Objectives
Base Salary and Benefits
B.
Cash Bonuses
C.
Equity-Based Compensation
D.
Retirement and Termination of Service Arrangements
E.
Exemption, Indemnification and Insurance
F.
Arrangements upon Change of Control
G.
Board of Directors Compensation
H.
Miscellaneous
I.

Table of Contents

A - 2

 Page

A- 3
A- 4
A-5
A- 7
A- 7
A- 8
A-9
A- 10
A-10

 
 
 
 
 
 
A. Overview and Objectives

1.

Introduction

This document sets forth the Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Directors (this "Compensation Policy" or "Policy") of Optibase Ltd. ("Optibase" or the "Company"), in
accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law of 1999 (the "Companies Law").

Compensation is a key component of Optibase's overall human capital strategy to attract, retain, reward, and motivate highly skilled individuals that will enhance Optibase's value and 
otherwise  assist  Optibase  to  reach  its  business  and  financial  long  term  goals.  Accordingly,  the  structure  of  this  Policy  was  established  to  tie  the  compensation  of  each  officer  to 
Optibase's goals and performance.

For purposes of this Policy, "Executive Officers" shall mean "Office Holders" as such term is defined in Section 1 of the Companies Law, excluding, unless otherwise expressly indicated 
herein, Optibase's directors; and "Directors" shall mean the Optibase's directors, as shall be from time to time, including the Executive Chairperson, unless otherwise expressly indicated 
herein.

This Compensation Policy shall serve as Optibase’s Compensation Policy for three (3) years, commencing as of its adoption.

The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of Optibase (the "Compensation Committee" and "Board" respectively) shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Policy 
from time to time, as required by the Companies Law.

2. Objectives

Optibase's objectives and goals in setting this Compensation Policy are to attract, motivate and retain highly experienced personnel who will provide leadership for Optibase's success 
and enhance shareholder value, while supporting a performance culture that is based on merit, and rewards excellent performance in the long term, while recognizing Optibase's core 
values. To that end, this Policy is designed, among others:

2.1.

To closely align the interests of the Executive Officers with those of Optibase's shareholders in order to enhance shareholder value;

2.2.

To provide the Executive Officers with a structured compensation package, putting the emphasis on a proper balance between the fixed components, i.e., the base salaries and 
benefits, and on the variable compensation, such as bonuses and equity-based compensation in order to minimize potential conflicts between the interests of Executive Officers and 
those of Optibase;

2.3.

To strengthen the retention and the motivation of Executive Officers in the long term.

3. Compensation structure and instruments

Compensation instruments under this Compensation Policy may include the following:

•

•

•

•

•

Base salary;

Benefits;

Cash bonuses;

Equity based compensation; and

Retirement and termination of service arrangements.

A - 3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. Overall Compensation - Ratio Between Fixed and Variable Compensation

This  Policy  aims  to  balance  the  mix  of  "Fixed  Compensation"  (comprised  of  base  salary and  benefits)  and  "Variable  Compensation"  (comprised  of  cash  bonuses  and  equity  based 
compensation) in order to, among other things, appropriately incentivize Executive Officers to meet Optibase's short and long term goals while taking into consideration the Company’s
need to manage a variety of business risks.

The  total  Variable  Compensation  of  each  Executive  Officer  (as  well  as  the  Executive  Chairman  of  the  Board ("Executive Chairman"))  shall  not  exceed  60%  of  the  total  compensation 
package  of  such  Executive  Officer  (and  the  Executive  Chairman)  on  an  annual  basis.  The  Compensation  Committee  and  Board  believe  that  such  range  expresses  the  appropriate 
compensation mix in the event that all performance objectives are achieved and assumes that all compensation elements are granted with respect to a given year.

5.

Intra-Company Compensation Ratio

In the process of drafting this Policy, Optibase’s Board and Compensation Committee have examined  the ratio between employer cost, as such term is defined in the Companies Law, 
associated with the engagement of the Executive Officers (as well as the Executive Chairman) and the average and median employer cost associated with the engagement of the other 
employees of Optibase (the "Ratio"). The Compensation Committee and Board believe that the current Ratio does not adversely impact the work environment in Optibase.

B. Base Salary and Benefits

6. Base Salary

6.1.

The base salary varies between Executive Officers (among themselves) and the Executive Chairman of the Board, and is individually determined by the Compensation Committee 
and the Board (unless other approvals are required under any applicable law) according to the educational background, prior vocational experience, qualifications, role, business 
responsibilities, past performance and previous compensation arrangements of such Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board.

6.2.

The maximum monthly base salary for each of the following roles shall be as follows:

(i) Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") – up to NIS 100,000 for a full time position

(ii) CEO of the Company's subsidiary ("Subsidiary CEO") – up to NIS 90,000 for a full time position;

(iii) Executive Officer who is not a director, CEO or Subsidiary CEO – up to NIS 50,000 for a full time position

Such amounts may be linked to increases in the Israeli Consumer Price Index ("Israeli CPI") or to the representative rate of exchange of the US dollar, as the case may be.

6.3.

The Executive Chairman may be paid management fee in amount that shall not exceed NIS 50,000 per month.

7. Benefits

7.1.

In addition to the base salary, the following benefits may be granted to the Executive Officers in order, among other things, to comply with legal requirements:

• Vacation days in accordance with market practice and applicable law;

•

•

Sick days in accordance with market practice and applicable law;

Convalescence pay according to applicable law;

A - 4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
• Monthly remuneration for a study fund, as allowed by applicable tax law and with reference to Optibase’s practice and common market practice;

•

•

Contribution by Optibase on behalf of the Executive Officer to an insurance policy or a pension fund, as allowed by applicable tax law and with reference to Optibase’s policies 
and procedures and common market practice; and

Contribution by Optibase on behalf of the Executive Officer towards work disability insurance, as allowed by applicable tax law and with reference to Optibase’s policies and 
procedures and common market practice.

7.2. Optibase may offer additional benefits to its Executive Officers, including but not limited to: communication, company car and travel benefits, insurances, other benefits (such as 

newspaper subscriptions, academic and professional studies), etc., including their gross up.

7.3. Optibase may reimburse its Executive Officers and its Executive Chairman for reasonable work-related expenses incurred as part of their activities, including without limitations, 
meeting participation expenses, reimbursement of business travel including a daily stipend when traveling and accommodation expenses. Optibase may provide advance payments 
to its Executive Officers in connection with work-related expenses.

7.4. Non-Israeli Executive Officers may receive other similar, comparable or customary benefits as applicable in the relevant jurisdiction in which they are employed.

8.

Signing Bonus

At the Compensation Committee’s and Board’s discretion, Optibase may grant a newly recruited Executive Officer a signing bonus. The signing bonus shall not exceed two (2) monthly 
base salaries of such Executive Officer.

C. Cash Bonuses

9. Annual Bonuses

9.1.

9.2.

9.3.

9.4.

9.5.

The payment of annual bonuses to the Executive Chairman and any Executive Officer for any particular fiscal year shall be subject to the fulfillment (in addition to the fulfillment of 
the applicable objectives set forth below as the case may be) of any one of the two following criteria: (a) that Optibase's EBITDA was at least USD $10 million (on a consolidated 
basis) during such fiscal year; or (b) that Optibase's net profit for such fiscal year was at least USD $500,000, net of equity gains or losses, and net of non-recurring expenses related 
to the purchase or disposal of real estate investments.

The  Compensation  Committee  and  Board  may  decide,  at  their  sole  discretion,  to  grant  annual  bonuses  to  the  Executive  Chairman  and  the  Executive  Officers,  subject  to  the 
fulfillment of the pre-conditions for payment of bonuses as detailed in section 9.1 above.

The  annual  bonus  to  the  Executive  Chairman  and  the  CEO  will  be  based  on  measurable  criteria.  The  measurable  criteria  and  their  relative  weight  shall  be  determined  by  the 
Compensation Committee and the Board in respect of each calendar year. These measurable criteria may include, inter alia, objectives relating to the annual income, annual profit 
(net profit, pre tax profit), budget, annual EBITDA, acquisition and/or disposal of assets, financing, re-financing and fundraising.

In addition, the Company may grant the CEO a bonus of up to three (3) monthly base salaries, at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and Board, based on the CEO's 
contribution to the Company.

The Company may also grant, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee and the Board, an annual bonus to its Executive Officers (other than the CEO) for their 
contribution to the Company. Such grants may be based in whole or in part on discretion, provided that they do not exceed the ceiling specified in section 9.6 below.

A - 5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.6.

9.7.

The annual bonus that may be paid to the Executive Officers for any fiscal year shall not exceed six (6) monthly base salaries to the CEO, and three (3) monthly base salaries to any 
other  Executive  Officer  (excluding  the  CEO).  The  annual  bonus  that  may  be  paid  to  the  Executive  Chairman  for  any  fiscal  year  shall  not  exceed  two  (2)  monthly  payments  of 
management fee.

The Board, following the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, shall be entitled to decrease the annual bonus to be paid to the Executive Chairman and/or Executive 
Officers based on measurable criteria (if such criteria were determined) or cancel such grant of bonuses altogether in its sole discretion, even in the event measurable criteria were 
determined and met..

10. Special Bonuses

In addition to the annual bonus, Optibase may grant its Executive Chairman and Executive Officers (other than the CEO) a special bonus as an award for special achievements (such as in 
connection with mergers and acquisitions, offerings, achieving target budget or business plan under exceptional circumstances or, regarding the Executive Officers, special recognition in 
case of retirement) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and Board which shall not exceed three (3) monthly base salaries for any Executive Officer (other than the CEO) and 
two (2) monthly payments of management fee for the Executive Chairman.

11. Pro Rata Payment

Should the employment or service of the Executive Chairman or any Executive Officer terminate prior to the end of a fiscal year, Optibase may pay the Executive Chairman or the Executive 
Officer his or her pro rata share of that fiscal year’s bonus, based on the period the Executive Chairman or such Executive Officer was employed by the Company or has served in the 
Company.

12. Compensation Recovery ("Clawback")

12.1.

In the event of an accounting restatement, Optibase shall be entitled to recover from its Executive Chairman or Executive Officers the bonus compensation in the amount in which 
such bonus exceeded what would have been paid under the financial statements, as restated, provided that a claim is made by Optibase prior to the third anniversary of fiscal year 
end of the restated financial statements.

12.2. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, the compensation recovery will not be triggered in the following events:

•

•

•

The financial restatement is required due to changes in the applicable financial reporting standards; or

The Compensation Committee has determined that clawback proceedings in the specific case would be impossible, impractical or not commercially or legally efficient; or

The amount to be paid under the clawback proceedings is less than 10% of the relevant bonus received by the Executive Chairman or Executive Officer.

12.3. Nothing in this Section 12 derogates from any other "clawback" or similar provisions regarding disgorging of profits imposed on the Executive Chairman and Executive Officers by 

virtue of applicable securities laws.

A - 6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
D. Equity-Based Compensation

13. General and Objectives

13.1. The Compensation Committee and Board may grant from time to time equity-based compensation which will be individually determined and awarded according to the performance, 
educational background, prior business experience, qualifications, role and the personal responsibilities of the Executive Officer. Equity-based compensation may also be awarded 
to  the  Directors,  subject  to  the  provisions  of  the  Companies  Law  and  the  regulations  thereunder  and  the  receipt  of  all  additional  approvals  that  may  be  required  under  the 
Companies Law.

13.2. The main objectives of the equity-based compensation is to enhance the alignment between the Executive Officers' and Directors' interests with the long term interests of Optibase 
and its shareholders, and to strengthen the retention and the motivation of Executive Officers in the long term. In addition, since equity-based awards are structured to vest over 
several years, their incentive value to recipients is aligned with longer-term strategic plans.

13.3. The equity based compensation offered by Optibase is intended to be in a form of share options, restricted shares and/or other equity based awards, such as RSUs, in accordance 

with the Company's incentive plan in place as may be updated from time to time.

14. Fair Market Value

The  fair  market  value  of  the  equity-based  compensation  for  each  Executive  Officer  and  each  Director  shall  not  exceed  USD  $200,000,  as  shall  be  determined  according  to  acceptable 
valuation practices at the time of grant.

15. Additional Terms

15.1. Subject to any applicable law, Optibase may determine, at the Compensation Committee and the Board’s discretion, the tax regime under which equity-based compensation may be 

granted, including a tax regime which will maximize the benefit to the Executive Officers and Directors.

15.2. All  equity-based  incentives  granted  to  Executive  Officers  and  Directors  shall  be  subject  to  vesting  periods  in  order  to  promote  long-term  retention  of  such  recipients.  Unless 
otherwise determined in a specific award agreement approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board, grants to Executive Officers shall vest gradually over a period of at 
least two years.

15.3. All other terms of the equity awards shall be in accordance with Optibase's incentive plans and other related practices and policies. Accordingly, the Board may, following approval 
by the Compensation Committee, extend the period of time for which an award is to remain exercisable and make provisions with respect to the acceleration of the vesting period of 
any  Executive  Officer's  or  Director's  awards,  including,  without  limitation,  in  connection  with  a  corporate  transaction  involving  a  change  of  control,  subject  to  any  additional 
approval as may be required by the Companies Law.

E. Retirement and Termination of Service Arrangements

16. Advanced Notice Period

16.1. Optibase  may  provide  each  Executive  Officer,  according  to  his  or  her  seniority  in  the  Company,  his  or  her  contribution  to  the  Company’s  goals  and  achievements  and  the 
circumstances of retirement, a prior notice of termination of up to three (3) months, except for the CEO whose prior notice may be of up to six (6) months. During such advance 
notice period, the Executive Officer may be entitled to all of the compensation elements, and to the continuation of vesting of his or her options, restricted shares or RSUs.

16.2. Optibase may waive the Executive Officer’s services to the Company during the advance notice period and pay the amount payable in lieu of notice, plus the value of benefits.

A - 7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17. Adjustment Period/Retirement Bonus

In addition to the advance notice period, the Compensation Committee and Board may provide an additional adjustment period/retirement bonus that will be determined, among other 
things, taking into consideration the Executive Officer's seniority in the Company, performance during employment, contribution to Optibase achieving its goals and the circumstances of 
retirement or termination. The maximum adjustment period/retirement bonus that may be paid to each Executive Officer is as follows:

17.1. CEO – for seniority of up to 5 years – the CEO will not be entitled to any Adjustment Period; seniority between 5 to 10 years – up to 4 monthly base salaries; and seniority of 10 

years or more – up to 8 monthly base salaries.

17.2. Executive Officer (except the CEO) – for seniority of up to 5 years – such Executive Officer will not be entitled to any Adjustment Period; seniority between 5 to 10 years – up to 2 

monthly base salary; and seniority of 10 years or more – up to 4 monthly base salaries.

The amounts for the adjustment period and the retirement bonus to be granted to an Executive Officer shall be calculated on the Executive Officer’s gross base salary without benefits, 
bonuses or grants which were granted to him or her during the Executive Officer's employment.

18. Additional Retirement and Termination Benefits

Optibase may provide additional retirement and terminations benefits and payments as may be required by applicable law (e.g., mandatory severance pay under Israeli labor laws), or 
which will be comparable to customary market practices.

19. Non-Compete Grant

Upon termination of employment and subject to applicable law, Optibase may grant to its Executive Officers a non-compete grant as an incentive to refrain from competing with Optibase 
for  a  defined  period  of  time.  The  terms  and  conditions  of  the  Non-Compete  grant  shall  be  decided  by  the  Board  and  shall  not  exceed  such  Executive  Officer's  monthly  base  salary 
multiplied by six (6).

F. Exemption, Indemnification and Insurance

20. Exemption

Optibase may exempt in advance and retroactively its directors and Executive Officers, from any liability to the Company, in whole or in part, for damages in consequence of his or her 
duty of care vis-a-vis the Company, to the fullest extent permitted by law and subject to the provisions of the Company’s articles.

21. Indemnification

Optibase may indemnify its directors and Executive Officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, for any liability and expense that may be imposed on the director or the 
Executive Officer, as provided in the Indemnity Agreement between such individuals and Optibase, all subject to applicable law and the Company’s articles of association.

22. Insurance

22.1. Optibase will provide "Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance" (the "Insurance Policy") for its directors and Executive Officers as follows:

•

The annual premium to be paid by the Optibase shall not exceed 1.5% of the aggregate coverage of the Insurance Policy;

A - 8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
•

•

The limit of liability of the insurer shall not exceed the greater of $25 million or 25% of the Company’s shareholders equity (based on the most recent financial statements of the 
Company at the time of approval by the Compensation Committee) per incident and insurance period (for a one-year period) in addition to reasonable litigation expenses;

The purchase of each Insurance Policy shall be approved by the Compensation Committee (and, if required by law, by the Board) which shall determine that the Insurance 
Policy reflects the current market conditions, and it shall not materially affect the Company's profitability, assets or liabilities.

22.2. Upon circumstances to be approved by the Compensation Committee (and, if required by law, by the Board), Optibase shall be entitled to enter into a "run off" Insurance Policy of 

up to seven (7) years, with the same insurer or any other insurer, as follows:

•

•

•

The limit of liability of the insurer shall not exceed the greater of $25 million or 25% of the Company’s shareholders equity (based on the most recent financial statements of the 
Company at the time of approval by the Compensation Committee) per incident and insurance period (for a one-year period) in addition to reasonable litigation expenses;

The annual premium shall not exceed 500% of the last paid annual premium; and

The purchase of such Insurance Policy shall be approved by the Compensation Committee (and, if required by law, by the Board) which shall determine that the Insurance 
Policy reflects the current market conditions, and that it shall not materially affect the Company's profitability, assets or liabilities.

22.3. Optibase may extend the Insurance Policy in place to include cover for liability pursuant to a future public offering of securities as follows:

•

•

The additional premium for such extension of liability coverage shall not exceed 50% of the last paid annual premium; and

The purchase of such Insurance Policy shall be approved by the Compensation Committee (and if required by law, by the Board) which shall determine that the Insurance 
Policy reflects the current market conditions, and it does not materially affect the Company's profitability, assets or liabilities.

G. Arrangements upon Change of Control

23. The following benefits may be granted to the Directors and/or Executive Officers in addition to the benefits applicable in the case of any retirement or termination of service upon a 

"Change of Control" following of which the employment of the Executive Officer is terminated or adversely adjusted in a material way:

23.1. Vesting acceleration of outstanding options or restricted shares.

23.2.

Extension of the exercising period of options or restricted shares for Optibase’s Executive Officers for a period of up to one (1) year and two (2) years, respectively, following the 
date of termination of employment.

23.3.

For Executive Officers only - up to an additional six (6) months of continued base salary and benefits following the date of employment termination (the "Additional Adjustment 
Period"). For avoidance of doubt, such additional Adjustment Period shall be in addition to the advance notice and adjustment periods pursuant to Sections 14  and 15 of this 
Compensation Policy.

A - 9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23.4.

For Executive Officers only - a cash bonus not to exceed together with the annual cash bonus, up to eighteen (18) monthly base salaries, in the case of the CEO, and nine (9) 
monthly base salaries, in the case of other Executive Officers (excluding the CEO).

H. Board of Directors Compensation

24. All the Directors, excluding the Executive Chairman, shall be entitled to an equal annual and per-meeting compensation.

25. The compensation of the Directors (including external directors and independent directors, but excluding the Executive Chairman) shall not exceed the maximum amounts provided in the 
Companies Regulations (Rules Regarding the Compensation and Expenses of an External Director) of 2000, as amended by the Companies Regulations (Relief for Public Companies Traded 
in Stock Exchange Outside of Israel) of 2000, as such regulations may be amended from time to time ("Compensation of Directors Regulations").

26. Directors may be granted equity-based compensation in accordance with the principles detailed in this Policy, and subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the regulations 

thereunder.

27. Optibase's  external  and  independent  Directors  may  be  entitled  to  reimbursement  of  expenses  in  accordance  with  the  Compensation  of  Directors  Regulations.  Optibase’s  Directors, 
excluding external and independent Directors, may be entitled to reimbursement of work-related  expenses,  including  meeting participation  expenses,  reimbursement  of business  travel 
including a daily stipend when traveling and accommodation expenses. Optibase may provide advance payments to its Directors in connection with work-related expenses.

I. Miscellaneous

28. This Policy is designed solely for the benefit of Optibase. Nothing in this Compensation Policy shall be deemed to grant any of Optibase’s Executive Officers, Directors or employees or 
any  third  party  any  right  or  privilege  in  connection  with  their  employment  by  the  Company.  Such  rights  and  privileges  shall  be  governed  by  the  respective  personal  employment 
agreements.

29. This Policy is subject to applicable law and is not intended, and should not be interpreted as limiting or derogating from, provisions of applicable law to the extent not permitted, nor 

should it be interpreted as limiting or derogating from the Company’s articles of association.

30. This Policy is not intended to affect current agreements nor affect obligating customs (if applicable) between the Company and its Executive Officers or Directors as such may exist prior to 

the approval of this Compensation Policy.

31.

In the event of amendments made to the Companies Law or any regulations promulgated thereunder providing relief in connection with Optibase’s compensation to its Executive Officers 
and Directors, Optibase may elect to act pursuant to such relief without regard to any contradiction with this Policy.

32. The  Compensation  Committee  and  Board  may  determine  that  none  or  only  part  of  the  payments,  benefits  and  perquisites  shall  be  granted,  and  is  authorized  to  cancel  or  suspend  a 

compensation package or part of it.

A - 10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
List of Subsidiaries

Exhibit 8.1

Optibase Inc., a California corporation

Optibase Real Estate Miami LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Optibase 2Penn LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

OPTX Equity LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

OPTX Lender LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Optibase FMC LLC, a Florida limited liability company

Optibase 300 Chicago LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Optibase Real Estate Europe Sarl, a Luxemburg company

Optibase RE1 Sarl, a Luxemburg company

Optibase RE2 SARL, a Luxemburg company

Optibase RES SARL, a Luxemburg company

Optibase Bavaria GmbH & Co. KG, a German partnership

Optibase Bavaria Holding GmbH, a German corporation

OPCTN SA, a Luxemburg company

Eldista GmbH, a Swiss company

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Exhibit 12.1

I, Amir Philips, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Optibase Ltd.

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the 

circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations 

and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))

and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information 
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being 
prepared;

Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable 
assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting 
principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and 
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  period  covered  by  the  annual  report  that  has  materially 
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  company’s auditors and the audit 

committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design  or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the 
company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2019

/s/ Amir Philips
Amir Philips
Chief Executive Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Exhibit 12.2

I, Yakir Ben-Naim, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Optibase Ltd.

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the 

circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations 

and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))

and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information 
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being 
prepared;

Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable 
assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting 
principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and 
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  period  covered  by  the  annual  report  that  has  materially 
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  company’s auditors and the audit 

committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design  or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the 
company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2019

/s/ Yakir Ben-Naim
Yakir Ben-Naim
Chief Financial Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 13.1

     In connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the 
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2018

/s/ Amir Philips
Name:  Amir Philips
Title: Chief Executive Officer

 
 
                                                  
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 13.2

     In connection with the Annual Report of Optibase Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the 
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2019

/s/ Yakir Ben-Naim
Name:  Yakir Ben-Naim
Title: Chief Financial Officer

 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Exhibit 15.1

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Files No. 333-91650; 333-122128; 333-137644; 333-139688; 333-148774; 333-198519) pertaining to Optibase 
Ltd. of our report, dated March 28, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Optibase Ltd., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Tel-Aviv, Israel                                                          
March 28, 2019    

 /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global

 
 
 
                
                                                        
                    
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Exhibit 15.2

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Files No. 333-91650; 333-122128; 333-137644; 333-139688; 333-148774; 333-198519) pertaining to Optibase 
Ltd. of our report, dated March 28, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of 300 River Holdings LLC as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 
2018.

/s/ EISNERAMPER LLP

EISNERAMPER LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 2019