Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Origin Bancorp

Origin Bancorp

obnk · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker obnk
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Origin Bancorp
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL REPORT
2  2
2  24
2025 PROXY STATEMENT

TO COMBINE THE POWER OF TRUSTED ADVISORS WITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
TO BUILD UNWAVERING LOYALTY BY CONNECTING PEOPLE TO THEIR DREAMS.
12
4.9
54
250
4.9/5.0: Origin’s average Google review 
rating based on a total of 342 reviews in 
2024.
Over 250 nonprofit organizations served
in our communities in 2024.
One of the Best Banks to Work For by 
American Banker for 12 consecutive 
years.
54 banking centers serving 35
communities.
ORIGIN VISION
T H E
Dollars in millions. Unaudited. Financial information as of 12/31/2024. For more details, please see the OBK 4Q2024 Investor Presentation filed with the SEC on January 22, 2025.

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
Since Origin’s founding in 1912, our culture and mission have 
revolved around our employees, customers, communities, 
and shareholders. This last year was a pivotal one, as we 
developed and began implementing our Optimize Origin 
strategy that is the basis for the Company’s next evolution. 
Optimize Origin is grounded in the continual enhancement 
of our award-winning culture and the drive for sustainable, 
elite financial performance. Our company has proven to 
be a dynamic leader in driving a corporate culture that 
emphasizes both employee experience and engagement. 
This philosophy has created a competitive advantage by 
enabling us to attract and retain best-in-class bankers in 
some of the most important markets in the country to grow 
our customer base and serve our communities. Optimize 
Origin has three primary pillars: 
•	 Productivity, Delivery & Efficiency
•	 Balance Sheet Optimization 
•	 Culture & Employee Engagement 
We know we can do more to reach our full potential. We 
believe the actions we have already taken through Optimize 
Origin will drive earnings improvement of approximately $20 
million annually on a pre-tax pre-provision basis. Ultimately, 
we expect to achieve a return on average assets (ROAA) run 
rate of 1% or greater by the fourth quarter of 2025, with the 
ultimate goal of top quartile ROAA among our peers.      
PRODUCTIVITY, DELIVERY & EFFICIENCY
Productivity, Delivery, and Efficiency starts with a deep 
analysis of branch profitability. Our acquisition in 2022 
created branch efficiency opportunities in Dallas and 
Fort Worth. After analyzing branch profitability, return 
metrics, branch proximity and drive times, as well as 
client transactions, behaviors, and product mix, we made 
the decision to consolidate eight banking centers. The 
eight consolidations include five in our Dallas-Fort Worth 
market, one in Houston, one in North Louisiana, and 
one in Mississippi. We are confident we can continue to 
deliver award-winning service to our valued customers 
and communities, while delivering approximately $4.6 
million in annual run-rate expense reduction.
This year, our team also created a detailed banker 
profitability report that provides deeper insight into 
portfolio mix, yields, growth capacity, appropriate 
support levels, banker net interest margin (NIM), and 
banker ROAA. With this report, Regional Presidents within 
each of our markets now have a clear view past traditional 
loan and deposit growth into detailed and significant 
production and return metrics. This analysis provided the 
ability to sort and stack rank bankers and portfolios to 
understand where profitability is being created and where 
portfolio support is needed. 
Using this data, we significantly repositioned our 
production teams and loan portfolios by identifying 
bankers and loan customers that did not fit our desired 
portfolio production, mix, or return profile necessary 
to drive higher ROAAs. We were then able to achieve 
cost savings from transitioning lower return profile 
bankers and eliminating less profitable portfolios to add 
approximately 10 new production bankers in Texas and 
our new Southeast team throughout 2024. On a net basis, 
combined with efficiency opportunities we identified 
within our mortgage team and portfolio support areas, 
we drove a combined $6.7 million in annual expense 
reduction. By reallocating resources into bankers with 
higher production and return opportunities, along with 
Origin’s footprint, talent, and capacity, we are confident 
in our ability to drive mid to high single digit loan growth 
in 2025.
In addition to these initiatives, we believe we have 
additional opportunities to drive productivity, delivery, 

and efficiency. First, in mid-2024, we began working with 
a professional consulting firm on a benchmarking project 
driven by data analytics, which should reveal significant 
opportunities to improve processes, identify additional 
efficiencies, and further enhance our return profile. 
Secondly, we continue to invest in Argent Financial Group, 
Inc., with the goal of achieving 20% ownership, which will 
change our accounting methodology on this investment. 
Origin purchased additional shares in 2024 to increase our 
ownership to approximately 19%. We hope to identify and 
purchase additional shares in 2025 to achieve our goal. We 
are honored and appreciative to have such a strong wealth 
and trust partner, and remain optimistic about Argent’s 
footprint, growth opportunities, and EBITDA expansion. 
Third, we have a clear ROAA lever in improving mortgage 
profitability. We are currently studying a mortgage 
delivery reimagination for our community banking model 
with the goal of significantly improving our returns in this 
business. We believe these efforts will continue to add 
value to our company over the long-term. 
BALANCE SHEET OPTIMIZATION 
Within the Balance Sheet Optimization pillar, we made 
several decisions in 2024 that should help increase ROAA 
moving forward: restructuring our securities portfolio 
to take advantage of the prolonged higher interest rate 
environment, optimizing our capital stack given our strong 
capital levels, and focusing on ways to better manage our 
own liquidity. In our securities portfolio, we sold nearly 
$190 million of securities yielding 1.5% and reinvested the 
proceeds at a yield of 5.2%, improving our NIM by seven 
basis points and our net interest income by approximately 
$6.2 million annually. While we realized a $14.6 million 
loss on the sale, we believe the relatively short 2.4-year 
earn-back with higher interest income was the right 
economic decision for our shareholders. On the capital 
front, we opted to redeem $70 million of subordinated 
debt in mid-February before the interest expense flipped 
from a relatively low fixed rate to a significantly higher 
floating rate, saving us approximately $2.1 million annually 
in higher interest expense. From a liquidity management 
perspective, we found opportunities to place cash into 
overnight sweep accounts earning a meaningfully higher 
interest rate and an estimated $1.2 million in additional 
annual interest income. As we continue to look for ways 
to better manage our balance sheet, we believe we could 
have further opportunity to save on higher interest expense 
with another $75 million subordinated debt issuance that 
will become redeemable in the fourth quarter of 2025. 
Additionally, we are constantly monitoring our securities 
portfolio for ways to improve interest income without 
meaningfully increasing price risk in the portfolio.  
CULTURE & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
At Origin, our culture emphasizes the employee experience 
and engagement. This has always been the foundation 
of our success and a competitive advantage across our 
footprint, enabling us to attract and retain best-in-class 
bankers in some of the best markets in the country. 
In fact, in 2024, American Banker ranked Origin as the 
#3 Best Bank to Work For in America – marking the 
12th consecutive year we have been recognized in this 
prestigious ranking. 
As we continue to implement Optimize Origin, our 
employees have been inspired by a new Performance 
Statement rolled out in 2024 that perfectly aligns with 
Origin’s vision and mission: “To enhance our dynamic 
culture and optimize financial performance to be the 
best bank in America and an extraordinary partner to our 
stakeholders.” 
MOVING FORWARD
I am excited about where Origin is going because I know 
what our organization is capable of and how committed we 
are to delivering results. Throughout my more than 40 years 
at Origin, we have had a strategy centered around dynamic 
organic growth. This is what led us into Dallas and Houston, 
to sustained growth in Louisiana and Mississippi, and our 
expansion into East Texas, South Alabama, and the Florida 
Panhandle. With Optimize Origin, we have strengthened our 
team and refocused our strategy to drive elite-level financial 
performance in our next evolution. 
As I think about all that we accomplished in 2024, I am 
excited by the hard work being done by our incredible team. 
Thank you to the employees of Origin who remain steadfast 
in providing value to our customers, communities, and 
shareholders. On behalf of our management team and board 
of directors, thank you for your continued partnership. I am 
passionate about our future as we Optimize Origin.  
 
DRAKE MILLS
Chairman,
President & Chief Executive Officer
Origin Bancorp, Inc.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

SUMMARY INCOME STATEMENT	
	
2024	
	
2023
	 Net Interest Income	
$	
300,366	
$	
299,557	
	
	 Provision for Credit Losses	
	
7,448	
	
16,753
	
   Noninterest Income	
	
55,379	
	
58,335
	 Noninterest Expense	
	
251,038	
	
235,216
	 Net Income	
	
76,492	
	
83,800
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET
	 Total Loans Held for Investment	
$	
7,573,713	
$	
7,660,944	
	
   Total Assets 	
	
9,678,702	
	
9,722,584
	
	 Total Deposits 	
	
8,223,120	
	
8,251,125	
	
   Total Stockholders’ Equity	
	
1,145,245	
	
1,062,905
PER COMMON SHARE DATA
	 Diluted Earnings Per Common Share	
$	
2.45	
$	
2.71
	
	 Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share	
	
0.60	
	
0.60
	
	 Book Value Per Common Share	
 	
36.71	
 	
34.30
RATIOS
	 Return on Average Assets	
	
0.77%	
	
0.84%
	 Return on Average Equity	
	
6.92%	
	
8.38%
	 Tier 1 Capital Ratio 	
	
13.52%	
	
12.01%
	 Total Capital Ratio	
	
16.44%	
	
15.02%

[This page intentionally left blank]

PROXY STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF 
 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
2    25
2    25

[This page intentionally left blank]

iii
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING 
OF STOCKHOLDERS 
500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270
March 13, 2025
DEAR ORIGIN BANCORP, INC. STOCKHOLDERS,
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Origin Bancorp, Inc., a 
Louisiana corporation (the “Company”), to be held on Wednesday, April  23, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., 
Central Time, at Squire Creek Country Club, 289 Squire Creek Parkway, Choudrant, Louisiana 71227. 
On or about March  13, 2025, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to all 
stockholders of record at the close of business on March 4, 2025, containing instructions on how to 
access our Proxy Statement and how to vote your shares, as well as instructions on how to request a 
paper copy of our proxy materials. You are urged to vote by proxy via the Internet, telephone, by mail, 
or in person at the Annual Meeting pursuant to the instructions in the Proxy Statement. 
We have adopted rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that allow 
companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the Internet. The Proxy Statement 
contains information about the official business of the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to 
attend, please vote your shares now. Of course, if you decide to personally attend the Annual Meeting, 
you will have the opportunity to revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person at the Annual 
Meeting.
We appreciate your continued support of the Company.
2025 Proxy Statement |

[This page intentionally left blank]

2025 Proxy Statement | v
VOTING ITEMS
1.	 Elect 11 directors, to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and to serve until their 
successors are elected and qualified;
2.	 Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers 
(“NEOs”) (the “Say-On-Pay Proposal”); and
3.	 Ratify the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public 
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.
Our Board of Directors (“Board”) has fixed the close of business on March 4, 2025, as the record 
date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting 
(the “Record Date”). A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available 
for inspection by any stockholder at our principal office during ordinary business hours beginning 
two business days after the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is mailed through the 
completion of the Annual Meeting, including any adjournment or postponement thereof. The mailing 
address for our principal office is 500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting 
of Stockholders to be held on April 23, 2025. This proxy statement and our annual report to 
stockholders are available at www.obkannualmeeting.com.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Drake Mills
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Ruston, Louisiana
March 13, 2025
Notice of 
Annual Meeting of 
Stockholders
Date:
April 23, 2025
Time: 
12:00 p.m., 
Central Time
Location: Squire Creek 
Country Club, 289 Squire 
Creek Parkway Choudrant, 
Louisiana 71227
Format: In Person
Record Date: Close of 
business on March 4, 2025
MEETING INFORMATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
vi
  iii   NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF 
STOCKHOLDERS
  1    PROXY STATEMENT
  3    ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
9 	
Commitment To Sustainability
18  PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
18 	 Director Nominees
19	 Director Nominee Qualifications and Experience
26	 Board Diversity
27	 2024 Named Executive Officers
29  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
29 	 Board Leadership Structure
30	 Director Independence
31	 Director Education and Self-Assessment
31	 Board Meetings and Committees
40	 Stockholder Nominees and Proposals for 2026 
Annual Meeting
41	 Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
45	 Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2024
48  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND 
ANALYSIS
48 	 Overview
48	 Key Compensation Committee Actions in 2024
49	 Executive Compensation Philosophy
49	 Compensation Best Practice
50	 2024 Business and Financial Highlights
50	 Say-On-Pay and Stockholder Outreach
51	 Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation 
Consultant and CEO
52	 Competitive Benchmarking and Compensation Peer 
Group
52	 Discussion of Executive Compensation Components
62	 Other Compensation Policies and Information
62	 Risk Assessment
63	 Clawbacks for Any Restatement; Executive 
Compensation Recovery Policy
64	 Insider Trading Policy and Restrictions
65	 Report of Compensation Committee
66	 Executive Compensation
68	 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
69	 Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
71	 2024 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
71	 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and 
Executive Supplemental Income Agreement
73	 Bank-Owned Life Insurance Plans
74	 Employment Arrangements, CIC Agreements, and 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or CIC
82	 CEO Pay Ratio
84	 Pay Versus Performance (“PVP”)
90  PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE 
SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL
92  PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC 
ACCOUNTING FIRM
93  OTHER INFORMATION
93 	 Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors 
and Management
94  DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
95  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
96  HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
2025 Proxy Statement | 1
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please read this proxy statement, the voting 
instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and vote. You may vote by proxy 
over the Internet, via telephone or, if you requested a paper proxy card in the mail, by completing, 
signing, dating and mailing the completed proxy card to us. You may also vote in person at the Annual 
Meeting. The instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card 
describe how to use these convenient services. You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in 
this proxy statement at any time before it is exercised. See “Voting Information and Questions You May 
Have—May I Change My Vote After I Have Submitted a Proxy?” for more information on how to vote 
your shares or revoke your proxy.
PROXY STATEMENT FOR
2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders 
to be held on April 23, 2025
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our 
company,” “the Company” or “Origin” refer to Origin Bancorp, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, and 
its consolidated subsidiaries. All references to “Origin Bank” or “the Bank” refer to Origin Bank, 
our wholly-owned bank subsidiary. In addition, unless the context otherwise requires, references to 
“stockholders” are to the holders of our common stock, par value $5.00 per share.
This proxy statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board for 
use at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, April 23, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., 
Central Time, at Squire Creek Country Club, 289 Squire Creek Parkway, Choudrant, Louisiana 71227, 
and any adjournments or postponements thereof for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement and 
the related notice of the Annual Meeting. The mailing address of the Company’s principal executive 
office is 500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting of 
Stockholders to be Held on April 23, 2025
Pursuant to rules promulgated by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials, 
including this proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended 
December 31, 2024, over the Internet. Accordingly, we are providing our stockholders with a Notice of 
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials. 
The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and how to vote your shares, 
as well as instructions on how to request a paper or e-mail copy of our proxy materials. We believe 
this electronic distribution process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials and reduces the 
environmental impact and cost of printing and distributing our proxy materials. We mailed the Notice 
on or about March 13, 2025, to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting at the 
close of business on March 4, 2025. You should read our entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
PROXY STATEMENT 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
2
PROXY STATEMENT 
BOARD OPTIMIZATION
Five members of the Board of Directors will not stand for reelection at the 2025 Annual Meeting of 
Stockholders, decreasing the size of the Board from 16 to 11 directors. The Nominating and Corporate 
Governance Committee of the Board, including Origin’s lead independent director, have extensively 
studied the optimal Board size and composition in relation to the Company’s continued growth. The 
recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reflects the Board’s 
strategic initiative to reduce its size to better align with governance best practices. The five directors 
not standing for election are Jay Dyer, Farrell Malone, Lori Sirman, Elizabeth Solender and Steve Taylor.
Each of these directors have made invaluable contributions to our Company and we are grateful for 
their service. Their expertise helped Origin through periods of significant transformation and growth. 
It is a credit to their stewardship that these directors each recognized that right-sizing the Board is in 
the Company’s best interests moving forward. The Company thanks them for their service to Origin 
and their guidance to our Board and management.
With these changes, we will have a smaller, more efficient Board of Directors, consistent with our 
commitment to best-in-class corporate governance. We have been intentional in the composition 
of a Board that will continue to be made up of highly qualified directors who each bring relevant 
backgrounds and skills to support management in driving the Company’s strategy and future growth, 
including experience in the banking and financial services industries as well as in executive leadership, 
strategic and financial planning, and risk management.
The changes to the Board composition are not being made as a result of any disagreement between 
the departing directors and the Company.

2025 Proxy Statement | 3
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
VOTING INFORMATION AND QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE
The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and 
is merely a summary of the information contained in this proxy statement. You should read this entire 
proxy statement carefully.
What is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?
Matters to be Considered and Vote Recommendation
We are asking stockholders to vote on the following matters at the Annual Meeting:
Matters for Stockholder Consideration
Our Board’s 
Recommendation
Proposal 1: Election of Directors (page 18)
To elect 11 directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until 
their successors are elected and qualified. Our Board believes that the 11 director 
nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight of the 
Company’s business and quality counsel to our management.
FOR each 
Director 
Nominee
Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on the Say-On-Pay Proposal (page 90) 
We are seeking a non-binding advisory vote from our stockholders to approve the 
compensation paid to our NEOs, as described in the Compensation Discussion and 
Analysis section and the executive compensation tables that follow, beginning on 
page 48 of this proxy statement. Our Board values our stockholders’ opinions and the 
Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when 
considering future executive compensation decisions.
FOR
Proposal 3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (page 92)
The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Forvis 
Mazars, LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the 
Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025, is in the best interests of 
the Company and its stockholders. As a matter of good corporate governance, our 
stockholders are being asked to ratify the selection of Forvis Mazars, LLP to serve as 
the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending 
December 31, 2025.
FOR
Stockholders will also transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting 
or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
4
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
When and Where Will the Annual Meeting Be Held?
The Annual Meeting is scheduled to take place at Squire Creek Country Club, 289 Squire Creek Parkway, 
Choudrant, Louisiana 71227, at 12:00 p.m., Central Time, on Wednesday, April 23, 2025.
Who Are the Nominees for Directors?
Please see Director Nominees section under Proposal 1: Election of Directors in this document for 
further information.
Who is Entitled to Vote?
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, March 4, 2025, 
may vote at the Annual Meeting. At the Record Date, we had 31,244,006 shares of common stock 
outstanding. In deciding all matters at the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be entitled to one 
vote for each share of common stock held by such stockholder on the Record Date. We do not have 
cumulative voting rights for the election of directors.
What Constitutes a Quorum for the Annual Meeting?
The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the 
Record Date must be represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, in order to constitute 
a quorum for the transaction of business.
What is the Difference Between a Stockholder of Record and a “Street 
Name” Holder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with EQ Shareowner Services, the Company’s stock 
transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. The Notice 
and, if requested, any printed copies of the proxy materials, including any proxy cards or voting 
instructions, are being sent directly to you by EQ Shareowner Services at the Company’s request.
If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank, broker or other nominee, the nominee is 
considered the stockholder of record of those shares. You are considered the beneficial owner of these 
shares, and your shares are held in “street name.” The Notice and, if applicable, any printed copies of 
the proxy materials, including any proxy cards or voting instructions, are being forwarded to you by your 
nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote your shares.
How do I Vote?
You may vote your shares of common stock either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. The 
process for voting your shares depends on how your shares are held, as described below.

2025 Proxy Statement | 5
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Shares Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record on the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy 
or you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. If you are a record holder and want to vote 
your shares by proxy, you have three ways to vote:
•	 Via the Internet: You may vote your proxy over the Internet by visiting the website www.proxypush.com/
obk. Have the Notice or, if applicable, the proxy card that may have been provided to you in hand when 
you access the website and follow the instructions for Internet voting on that website.
•	 Via Telephone: To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-866-883-3382 using a touch-tone phone 
and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the control number from the 
Notice.
•	 Via Mail: If you request a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by indicating on 
the proxy card(s) applicable to your common stock how you want to vote and signing, dating and 
mailing your proxy card(s) in the enclosed pre-addressed postage-paid envelope as soon as possible 
to ensure that it will be received in advance of the Annual Meeting.
Please refer to the specific instructions set forth in your Notice or proxy card for additional information 
on how to vote. Voting your shares by proxy will enable your shares of common stock to be represented 
and voted at the Annual Meeting if you do not attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in 
person.
To ensure your vote is counted at the annual meeting, you must submit your vote via internet or 
telephone by 11:59 p.m., Central Time on April 22, 2025 (11:59 p.m., Central Time on April 20, 2025, 
if voting shares of common stock held in our 401(k) plan). If voting via mail, the company must receive 
your proxy no later than April 22, 2025 (April 20, 2025, if voting shares of common stock held in our 
401(k) plan).
Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank
If your shares of common stock are held in “street name,” your ability to vote depends on your bank, 
broker or other nominee’s voting process. Your bank, broker or other nominee should provide you with 
voting instructions and materials to vote your shares. By following those voting instructions, you may 
direct your nominee on how to vote your shares. Without instructions from you, your bank, broker or 
other nominee will be permitted to exercise its own voting discretion with respect to the ratification 
of the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP (Proposal 3), but will not be permitted to exercise voting 
discretion with respect to any of the other proposals being voted on at the Annual Meeting.
To vote the shares that you hold in “street name” in person at the Annual Meeting, you must bring a 
legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee (i) confirming that you were the beneficial owner 
of those shares at the close of business on the Record Date, (ii) stating the number of shares of which 
you were the beneficial owner that were held for your benefit on the Record Date by that broker, bank 
or other nominee and (iii) appointing you as the record holder’s proxy to vote the shares covered by 
that proxy at the Annual Meeting. If you fail to bring a nominee-issued proxy to the Annual Meeting, 
you will not be able to vote your nominee-held shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
6
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
What is a Broker Non-Vote?
A broker non-vote occurs when a bank, broker, or other nominee holding shares of common stock 
for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because such nominee does not have 
discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received voting instructions from 
the beneficial owner.
Your broker has discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to the ratification of the 
appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal 
year ending December 31, 2025 (Proposal 3). In the absence of specific instructions from you, your 
broker does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to any other proposal.
May I Change My Vote After I Have Submitted a Proxy?
Yes. Regardless of the method used to cast a vote, if you are a stockholder of record, you may change 
your vote or revoke your proxy by:
•	 Casting a new vote over the Internet by visiting the website www.proxypush.com/obk and following 
the instructions online or in your Notice or the proxy card that may have been provided to you 
before the Internet voting deadline;
•	 Casting a new vote by telephone by calling 1-866-883-3382 using a touch-tone phone and following 
the recorded instructions before the telephone voting deadline;
•	 Completing, signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date than your original proxy card, 
if applicable, no later than the deadline, and any earlier proxy will be revoked automatically; or
•	 Attending the Annual Meeting and vote in person, which would revoke any earlier proxy. However, 
attending the Annual Meeting in person will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote 
again in person at the Annual Meeting.
How Will My Shares Be Voted if I Return a Signed and Dated Proxy Card, 
but Do Not Specify How My Shares Will Be Voted?
If you are a stockholder of record who returns a completed proxy card that does not specify how you 
want to vote your shares on one or more proposals, the proxies will vote your shares for each proposal 
as to which you provide no voting instructions, and such shares will be voted in the following manner:
Proposal 1
FOR the election of all of the nominees for director;
Proposal 2
FOR, on an advisory basis, the Say-On-Pay Proposal;
Proposal 3
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP to serve as 
our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending 
December 31, 2025;

2025 Proxy Statement | 7
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
If you are a “street name” holder and do not provide voting instructions on one or more proposals, 
your bank, broker or other nominee will be unable to vote those shares on any of the proposals 
except to vote on the ratification of the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP, for the fiscal year ending 
December 31, 2025 (Proposal 3).
What Are My Choices When Voting?
With respect to all proposals you may vote “For” or “Against” or you may “Abstain” from voting. 
What Percentage of the Vote is Required to Approve Each Proposal?
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote at the 
Annual Meeting is required for (i) the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1), (ii) the approval, on 
a non-binding basis, of our Say-On-Pay Proposal (Proposal 2), and (iii) the ratification of Forvis Mazars, 
LLP’s appointment as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 
ending December 31, 2025 (Proposal 3). A majority of the votes cast shall mean that the number of 
shares that voted “For” the election of a director or a proposal, as applicable, exceeds the number 
of shares voted “Against” that director or proposal, as applicable.
How Are Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions Treated?
Broker non-votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of 
a quorum. A broker non-vote or an abstention with respect to (i) the election of the director nominees 
(Proposal 1), (ii) the approval, on a non-binding basis, of our Say-On-Pay Proposal (Proposal 2), and 
(iii)  the ratification of Forvis Mazars, LLP’s appointment as the Company’s independent registered 
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 (Proposal 3), will not be counted 
as a vote cast either “For” or “Against” such proposals. 
Are There Any Other Matters to Be Acted Upon at the Annual Meeting?
Management does not intend to present any business at the Annual Meeting for a vote other than the 
matters set forth in the Notice, and management has no information that others will do so. The proxy 
also confers on the proxies the discretionary authority to vote with respect to any matter properly 
presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters requiring a vote of our stockholders properly come 
before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy 
to vote the shares represented by the proxies held by them in accordance with applicable law and their 
judgment on such matters.
Where Can I Find Voting Results?
We will publish the voting results in a current report on Form 8-K, which will be filed with the SEC within 
four business days following the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time 
to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to 
publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an 
additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
8
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
What Are the Solicitation Expenses and Who Pays the Cost of this Proxy 
Solicitation?
Our Board is asking for your proxy, and we will pay all of the costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. 
We have engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc. to solicit proxies for us. We have agreed to reimburse D.F. King 
for reasonable expenses. In addition to the solicitation of proxies via mail, our officers, directors, and 
employees may solicit proxies personally or through other means of communication, such as electronic 
mail, without being paid additional compensation for such services. The Company will reimburse banks, 
brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred 
in forwarding the proxy materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock.
How Can I Communicate with the Board?
Our Board welcomes suggestions and comments from stockholders or other interested parties and has 
adopted a formal process by which stockholders/interested parties may communicate with our Board 
or any of its directors. Stockholders/interested parties who wish to communicate with our Board may 
do so by sending written communications addressed to Origin Bancorp, Inc., 500 South Service Road 
East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270, Attn: Corporate Secretary, or via e-mail at corpsecretary@origin.bank. 
Stockholder/interested party communications will be sent directly to the specific director or directors 
of the Company indicated in the communication or to all members of our Board if not specified. All 
communications (other than commercial communications soliciting the sale of goods or services to, 
or employment with, the Company or directors of the Company) will be directed to the appropriate 
committee, the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Independent Director, or to any individual director 
specified in the communication, as applicable. In addition, all stockholders are encouraged to attend 
the Annual Meeting where senior management and representatives from our independent registered 
public accounting firm, as well as members of our Board, will be available to answer questions.
Why did I Receive a One-Page Notice in the Mail Regarding the Internet 
Availability of Proxy Materials Instead of Printed Proxy Materials?
In accordance with rules promulgated by the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials 
to all of our stockholders, we have elected to provide access to such materials to our stockholders over 
the Internet. Accordingly, on or about March 13, 2025, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability 
of Proxy Materials to all stockholders of record on the Record Date entitled to vote at the Annual 
Meeting. Stockholders will have the ability to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in 
the Notice. The Notice also contains instructions on how to vote your shares, as well as instructions on 
how to request a paper or e-mail copy of our proxy materials. We encourage you to take advantage of 
the availability of the proxy materials over the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact and 
cost of printing and distributing our proxy materials.
How Can I Get Electronic Access to the Proxy Materials?
The Notice provides you with instructions regarding how to:
•	 View our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting over the Internet;
•	 Vote your shares after you have viewed our proxy materials (including any control/identification 
numbers that you need to access your form of proxy);

2025 Proxy Statement | 9
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
•	 Obtain directions to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person;
•	 Request a printed copy or e-mail copy with links to the proxy materials, including the date by which 
the request should be made to facilitate timely delivery; and
•	 Instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you by mail or electronically by e-mail.
Will I Receive any Other Proxy Materials by Mail (Besides the Notice)?
If you request paper copies of our proxy materials by following the instructions in the Notice, we will 
send you our proxy materials, including a proxy card, in the mail.
What Should I Do if I Receive More Than One Set of Voting Materials?
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of the Notice or 
other proxy materials, including multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you 
hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive separate voting instructions for 
each brokerage account in which you hold shares. Similarly, if you are a stockholder of record and hold 
shares in a brokerage account, you may receive a proxy card for shares held in your name and voting 
instructions for shares held in “street name.” To ensure that all of your shares are voted, we encourage 
you to respond to each set of voting materials that you receive.
COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY
Origin is a financial holding company headquartered in Ruston, Louisiana. Our wholly-owned bank 
subsidiary, Origin Bank, was founded in 1912 in Choudrant, Louisiana, and Origin Bank has been 
committed to serving our community since its founding. Deeply rooted in Origin’s history is a culture 
committed to providing personalized relationship banking to businesses, municipalities, and personal 
clients to enrich the lives of the people in the communities it serves. Origin provides a broad range 
of financial services and currently operates more than 54 locations in Dallas/Fort Worth, East Texas, 
Houston, North Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle.
We’ve been supporting our stakeholders for more than 100 years. Our mission is to passionately pursue 
ways to make banking and insurance more rewarding for our employees, customers, communities and 
shareholders. As a part of this overall mission, we are focused on integrating environmental, social and 
governance (‘ESG’) principles into our business strategy in ways that optimize opportunities to make 
positive impacts while advancing long-term goals.
Sustainability Oversight 
Origin strives to foster a team that reflects our strong belief in corporate responsibility. In 2022, 
Origin continued to build upon and improve our long-standing corporate sustainability commitment 
and evolved its strategy. Our executive leadership team and our Board recognizing the importance 
of these responsibilities, established an internal cross-functional management working group that is 
tasked with driving progress in the initiatives that promote sustainability and further transparency. 
Our board oversees these sustainability efforts, led by our Nominating and Corporate Governance 
Committee. Our inaugural Corporate Sustainability Report, published last spring, adopted a priority-
based approach, and was informed by the comprehensive Sustainability Accounting Standard Board 
(“SASB”) standard with oversight provided by our working group.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
10
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
In 2024 and 2023, we have continued to enhance our corporate sustainability strategy to align with our 
commitment and stated mission. Our executive management team has prioritized the incorporation 
of sustainability objectives into our operational framework and working group. The Board, led by our 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, is updated regularly regarding Origin’s sustainability 
initiatives and actively oversees and supports the working group as they lead the Company’s efforts 
to integrate sustainability into day-to-day operations. Our executive management team has prioritized 
the incorporation of long-term sustainability objectives into our operational framework.
How we understand, prioritize, and approach sustainability topics most relevant to our business is 
communicated through our sustainability reporting. Against this backdrop, we have, with the assistance 
of outside expertise, engaged with our internal and external stakeholders on sustainability topics to 
help further inform our future direction and determine our strategic priorities. The three tenants of 
our sustainability strategy are: (1) Environmental Responsibility, (2) Social Impact and (3) a Culture of 
Governance.
In conjunction with our 2025 Annual Meeting, we plan to complete our second materiality assessment, 
which will include examining a range of key stakeholders, including investors, clients, employees and 
rating organizations as well as studying industry peers. This analysis will result in the release of our 
Corporate Sustainability Report.
Environmental Responsibility
We embed the principles of advancing environmental pragmatism into our practices through green 
investments and long-term implementation of new technologies. We are devoted to operating our 
business in a sustainable manner and have undertaken several initiatives designed to reduce our impact 
on the environment and to promote environmentally friendly projects and practices. With a view to 
increasing efficiency and reducing waste, we are continuing to digitize manual back office and financial 
center functions. In 2024, we continued to:
•	 encourage environmentally friendly work practices by supporting the recycling of plastic, glass, and 
paper and utilizing collection bins for batteries, aluminum toner cartridges, and computer hardware.
•	 offered filtered water refill stations for employees at majority of our locations.
•	 increased the use of e-records and e-signing technology, resulting in paper waste and carbon 
emissions reduction, including utilizing digital solutions such as mobile/online banking, eStatements, 
electronic bill pay, and remote deposit capture.
•	 migrate technology infrastructure to a cloud environment, reducing energy usage, and accordingly, 
our carbon footprint.
•	 enhance our location’s operations through energy efficiency measures, demonstrating our 
commitment to reducing carbon emissions, waste and water usage. 
•	 promote energy efficiency measures throughout our supply chain. 
Origin is constantly improving its operations to proactively find more efficient and effective ways to 
ensure our long-term success. Through our modernization efforts, we strive to do our part in offsetting 
negative impacts on the environment. We continue to evaluate green equipment for office use such as 

2025 Proxy Statement | 11
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Energy-Star® appliances, motion detector lighting, as well as high-efficiency HVAC units. Beginning in 
2018, we commenced a project to retrofit our offices with LED lighting, which decreased our electricity 
usage (kWh) by roughly 29% or 2,000,000 kWh. Currently, most of Origin’s total office space utilizes 
LED lighting. Additionally, select office locations are LEED certified. This certification, awarded by the 
U.S. Green Building Council, is based on the properties’ use of sustainable materials, water and energy 
efficiency, indoor environmental quality, location and transportation, and overall innovation.
Origin complies with applicable legal and regulatory requirements to control and reduce its 
environmental footprint. We are committed to making the necessary investments in systems and 
technology to ensure compliance and to meet or exceed these standards. Origin began to further 
integrate information on environmental risks and challenges by incorporating climate risks into credit 
analyses. We have always innately incorporated environmental issues into our credit decisions. In 2024, 
our internal working group began to evaluate climate change and other environmental considerations 
as part of our broader commitment to identifying sustainability risks. This assessment is considering 
both acute and chronic risks. Acute risks, typically event-driven, include extreme heat, wildfires, dry 
days, flooding, and hurricanes. Chronic risks, reflecting longer-term shifts in climate patterns, include 
sea level rise, changes in mean temperature, temperature variability, and mean precipitation.
We believe that our focus on environmental sustainability, with the objective of reducing costs and 
improving long-term sustainability of our operations will provide a strategic benefit. Furthermore, we 
recognize that energy management is a growing risk for our stakeholders, and we are committed to 
doing our part to mitigate this risk by placing increased focus on pragmatic energy solutions. 
Social Impact
At Origin, we believe success is built on the collaborative efforts of exceptional talent. Our ongoing 
focus is to leverage this diverse array of knowledge and skills, fostering an inclusive environment that 
is a driving force for sustained growth. Making a difference for our customers starts with setting an 
example through our own actions. We employ proven, knowledgeable team members with extensive 
expertise when it comes to our banking and insurance activities. Each member of our Origin team 
brings their own personal experiences and interests to inform the service they provide. In addition, 
we learn from our customers and use this new understanding to go out and improve the places we 
call home.
One of our core values is genuine respect for yourself and others. This value makes the support of 
diversity, equity and inclusion a natural fit for our culture and essential to the way we conduct business, 
foster individual and team enrichment, and participate in our communities. We believe it is only with 
a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace that the organization can truly perform at its best, carry 
out its vision, and make a difference in the communities we serve. In 2023, Origin Bank announced the 
formation of the Diversity Council, which consists of 17 diverse employees that collectively advance our 
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts in a way that makes a difference within our workplace and in the 
communities we serve. We believe all employees should be given opportunities to perform to their full 
potential, knowing their performance will be measured and rewarded fairly.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
12
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Health & Wellness
We provide competitive compensation and benefits in order to attract and retain top talent. In 
addition to base pay and stock awards, we administer several incentive programs that are designed 
to link performance to pay and drive results towards the achievement of overall corporate goals. We 
offer robust health, wellness and financial benefits as detailed below. In addition, we provide unique 
and exclusive benefits through programs such as DreamManager®, Smart Dollar, Origin Leadership 
Academies and Project Enrich.
We are committed to our employees’ mental and physical health and safety. We offer a robust benefits 
package which includes:
•	 Comprehensive medical benefits with $0 cost options for employees
•	 Competitive ancillary benefits, such as dental, vision, critical illness, legal and identify theft coverage
•	 Generous paid time off (“PTO”) policy
•	 Company-paid short and long-term disability and life insurance
•	 Flexible spending accounts for both healthcare and dependent care 
•	 Health savings accounts with Company contributions
•	 401(k) retirement savings program with Company match, along with free access to financial advisors 
to assist with retirement planning
•	 Employee Stock Purchase Program
•	 Paid parental leave
•	 Employee Assistance Program which offers counseling and mental wellness appointments at no cost 
to the employee
Employee Engagement
Our Dream Manager® program assists our employees in meeting their own personal and professional 
goals in addition to helping them improve physically, emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually. Over 
300 employees have participated in this program since 2019. We also offer a nationally-recognized 
financial wellness program (“SmartDollar”) that is designed to assist our employees in becoming 
debt-free and in saving money for emergencies and retirement, empowering them to become better 
financially prepared for their future, which during 2024, had an over 46% participation rate. Due to our 
adoption rate, we won a national award in 2021 from the Dave Ramsey Foundation called the “Vision” 
award. We employ a full-time certified Holistic Health Coach who spearheads our Health & Wellness 
initiatives. In addition to providing health and wellness information on a regular basis to all employees, 
we currently have approximately 10% of our employees working individually with our Health Coach to 
meet their desire to be healthier, physically and mentally. As of December 31, 2024, participants have 
lost a total of 4,560 pounds.

2025 Proxy Statement | 13
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Community & Volunteerism
Since our inception, we have been deeply committed to building relationships and making a difference 
in our local communities. Investing in people, neighborhoods and local businesses is part of our mission. 
We strive to understand the needs of the people in our local communities and how we can help them 
attain their goals and improve the quality of lives throughout our footprint.
Additionally, in one specific initiative designed to help the communities we serve, our Project Enrich 
program provides employees with up to twenty hours of paid time off per year to volunteer in their 
communities. In 2024, the employees of Origin volunteered 4,615 hours in the community during 
working hours, not including 1,487 hours of personal time outside of working hours. To supplement 
our volunteer work, we seek out areas where we can make an additional impact through financial 
donations. Our Bank on Their Future program was created to help provide support to local schools and 
thereby invest in our community’s future.
Over the past several years, Origin Bank has been recognized for our commitment to our communities 
and our customers, including:
•	 United Way Circle of Honor and Gold Award
•	 Spirit of Giving Award
•	 Boys and Girls Club as well as multiple educational initiatives
Origin has a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act (‘CRA’) to help meet the credit 
needs of its communities. We believe that helping to meet these needs is necessary for the continued 
growth and vitality of our communities. Our current community investment strategy includes lending, 
broadening digital access, and increasing financial literacy programs. Through strategic nonprofit 
partnerships, inspiring volunteer experiences, and philanthropy, our corporate responsibility efforts 
are focused on creating a better world. Building on over 100 years of working in our community, Origin 
offers unique opportunities for collective action, enhancing existing giving and volunteer initiatives 
with the Origin community.
Employee Feedback
Attracting, developing and retaining talented employees is critical to our success and is an integral part 
of our human capital strategy. Employee feedback is highly valued at Origin and our employees provide 
anonymous input via multiple engagement surveys each year, facilitated by Glint, a people success 
platform built on an approach that helps organizations increase employee engagement, develop their 
people, and improve business results.
We receive hundreds of written comments from each survey that in turn are used to improve processes, 
policies, or programs which show tangible affirmation of those comments. We also have continued a 
practice that was implemented at the beginning of the pandemic called “The Origin Insider” a meeting 
series that takes a deep dive into various topics and departments, and often features executive speakers. 
This program gives employees an inside look at executives on a personal level, allows employees 
to learn about other areas of the Bank and provides education that supports physical and mental 
awareness. These meetings occur monthly and feature internal and external speakers who discuss a 
wide range of topics designed to promote employee engagement and satisfaction. 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
14
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Talent Development
We have begun to enhance our culture and talent management function by implementing a Human 
Capital Management (‘HCM’) program. We make significant investments in formal development 
programs to build our talent pipeline. Talent development at Origin begins with our comprehensive 
recruitment program and continues throughout the employee life cycle. The Company recognizes 
that its success is highly dependent on its ability to attract, retain and develop our people. To foster 
this development, the Company engages in annual succession planning focused on building a strong, 
diverse talent pipeline.
We conduct regular talent succession assessments along with individual performance reviews in which 
managers provide regular feedback and coaching to assist with the development of our employees, 
including the use of individual development plans to assist with career development. Our Giving Interns 
Valuable Experience (“G.I.V.E.”) program was launched in 2021 and since that time, we have welcomed 
a diverse group of 64 interns from 29 different universities. Over 56% of interns have been minorities.
We provide our employees and their families access to a platform called “Right Now Media at Work” 
which has thousands of streaming videos dedicated to both personal and professional development. 
This tool is designed to enhance work, life and leadership skills and is used for team building and 
individual development plans. In addition, employees can access a variety of personal care topics such 
as finances, relationships and mental health.
We utilize assessment tools such as Predictive Index to ensure employees are placed in jobs which best 
suit their skills and personalities. We also use these insights for team building by teaching employees 
how to better understand and communicate with each other based on their profile. 
We believe it is critical to support our employees in their career development goals; and, we provide 
various paths to assist employees in their development. We strive to promote from within when possible, 
so most open positions are posted internally before we begin looking externally to hire. This allows us 
to provide more growth opportunities for current employees. In addition, all employees have access 
to the Origin Career Center, which provides multiple resources to assist employees in identifying their 
career path goals and what steps need to be taken to enhance their promotional opportunities. Our 
Career Manager program offers young professionals one-on-one time with senior leaders to accelerate 
their understanding of the business of banking. In 2023, we launched a formal mentorship program 
where employees connect with an experienced mentor in structured sessions which prepare them for 
future growth opportunities. 
We provide advanced development for next-generation leaders via our formal Leadership programs, 
the Origin Leadership Academy and the Emerging Leaders Council, which provide structured training 
and collaboration with other aspiring leaders throughout the organization. The Origin Leadership 
Academy is a two-year program designed to prepare participants to move into executive roles as part 
of our succession planning. Participants are chosen by senior management. The Emerging Leaders 
Council is a one-year program designed to train and develop rising leaders in our organization. Both 
programs feature interactive team building activities, group projects, and in-depth leadership training. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 15
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Inclusion & Belonging
Our commitment to inclusion starts with our goal of attracting, retaining, and developing a workforce 
that is diverse in background, knowledge, skill, and experience. Origin is committed to providing equal 
employment opportunities, and makes all recruiting, payment, performance, and promotion decisions 
based on merit, without discrimination.
Origin is committed to enhancing our workforce at all levels of the organization and providing equal 
opportunity in all aspects of employment. In 2024, the Company continues to make progress toward 
attracting and retaining an inclusive workforce. The Company’s talent acquisition team attends multiple 
job fairs throughout the year that allow us to connect with many talented and diverse candidates who 
may later become employed. We also have engaged a third-party workforce development company 
that utilizes a connected system of job recruiting sites that post our employment opportunities with 
various professional and industry organizations, skilled trade associations and universities. In addition, 
our G.I.V.E. internship program is designed to develop a strong pool of diverse candidates through 
on-campus recruiting with local colleges and universities, including Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities (“HBCUs”) in our markets. 
The Origin Diversity Council was launched in 2023 and has served to make a difference within our 
workplace and in the communities we serve. The Council hosted Origin Connections Month in November, 
which featured multiple fun and engaging opportunities for employees to build relationships and learn 
more about each other’s backgrounds and cultures. The Council also introduced a “Welcome Buddy” 
program which partners new hires with an employee who can help them quickly get acclimated and 
connected in the workplace. Members of the Diversity Council are committed to attending networking 
events and job fairs to assist in our efforts to recruit diverse candidates. 
Because of the great emphasis we place on connections, our team members form relationships with 
those around them based on mutual respect, dignity and understanding. The Company has strict non-
discrimination and anti-harassment policies in place and these policies drive a workplace and workforce 
that embraces the highest ethical and moral standards. 
We surveyed our employees in regard to inclusion and belonging. Nine out of ten responses in the 
survey exceeded the benchmarks of Glint’s top 10% of global companies. The previously mentioned 
Diversity Council was one initiative that was launched based on the results of the survey and it will 
collectively advance our diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in a way that makes a difference within 
our workplace and in the communities we serve. In 2024, our Diversity Council continued Employee 
Spotlights as a platform to drive engagement and build connections by sharing employees’ stories to 
highlight different backgrounds and cultures within our organization.
Our team members form deeper relationships with those around them based on mutual respect, dignity 
and understanding. The Company has non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies as outlined in 
our Employee Handbook. The Board oversees and periodically reviews our human rights policies, while 
our Chief Human Resources Officer is responsible for its ongoing implementation, reporting to the 
Board and its committees on any significant issues. These policies drive a workplace and workforce that 
embraces the highest ethical and moral standards. Furthermore, all employees participate in inclusion 
training. We also offer weekly micro lessons to our managers through a program called Blue Ocean 
Brain which supports our endeavor to reimagine inclusion in the workplace and provides our employees 
with a wide array of learning topics.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
16
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Origin has been recognized as a “Best Bank to Work For” by American Banker magazine for twelve 
consecutive years, which we believe is attributable to our deep commitment to corporate culture, and 
our focus on initiatives to support and develop our employees. This ranking is based on feedback from 
surveys given directly to the American Banker magazine from our employees.
Culture of Governance 
Origin is committed to achieving excellence in our corporate governance practices, underscoring our 
culture of accountability and integrity. We conduct our business with fairness, ethical responsibility, and 
a steadfast commitment to earning the trust of our stakeholders. Our Board is comprised of a majority 
of independent directors as defined by the NYSE listing standards and our Guidelines. Our corporate 
governance policies and practices include annual evaluations of the Board and its committees, as well 
as continuing director education. 
Our Code of Ethics fosters accountability and transparency across Origin. These guidelines embody our 
commitment to maintaining the highest standards of ethics and integrity while ensuring our operations 
comply with all applicable laws. Through our employee handbook, we communicate workplace policies 
that uphold the highest ethical standards. Core to our ethics and compliance programs are ongoing 
communications and training initiatives that ensure our employees understand Origin’s expectations 
and policies. These training sessions, which are both web-base and in-person, cover the regulations 
and expected business practices relevant to Origin.
We understand that effective risk management is vital for long-term success. Origin implements robust 
risk management programs to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing 
ethical business practices, including our relationships with suppliers, customers and business partners, 
and our industry. Our comprehensive risk program covers all locations and involves evaluations to 
identify critical risks. These risks and their management plans are communicated to the Board and 
committees. Origin’s whistleblower policy further supports our stated goals within our governance 
structure. Monitored by an independent third party, this program is designed to receive complaints 
of financial irregularities, breaches of internal controls, conflicts of interest and fraud. We screen 
potential suppliers prior to contract execution and monitor contracted suppliers to ensure we do not 
conduct business with entities that pose more than acceptable levels of risks to our operations, brand 
or reputation.
We are subject to rigorous controls and audits, and our board actively oversees our cybersecurity 
practices. Our risk management teams ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and 
coordinate with subject-matter experts throughout the business to identify, monitor and mitigate 
material risks. At Origin, we expect each employee to be responsible for the security and confidentiality 
of client information. We regularly provide employees and directors with information security awareness 
training, covering the recognition and appropriate handling of potential phishing emails, which can 
introduce malware to a company’s network, result in the theft of user credentials and, ultimately, 
place client or employee data, or other sensitive company data, at risk. We regularly test employees 
to determine their susceptibility to phishing test emails. We require susceptible employees to take 
additional training and provide regular reports to management. We additionally maintain procedures 
for the safe storage and handling and secure disposal of sensitive information.

2025 Proxy Statement | 17
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Before engaging third-party service providers, we perform due diligence in order to identify and 
evaluate their cyber risks. This process is led by the Operational Risk Management team and includes 
participation of dedicated information security resources. Risk assessments are performed using 
Service Organization Controls (“SOC”) reports and other tools. Third party service providers processing 
sensitive client data are contractually required to meet applicable legal and regulatory obligations to 
protect sensitive data against cyber security threats and unauthorized access to the sensitive data. 
After contract executions, third-party service providers undergo ongoing monitoring to ensure they 
continue to maintain internal controls and protocols designed to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, 
assets, data, and capabilities.
Origin has a robust Information Security program. Our IT team is available 24/7 and uses a combination 
of industry-leading tools and innovative technologies to help protect our stakeholder’s data. Our team 
members are responsible for complying with our data security standards and complete mandatory 
annual training to understand the behaviors and technical requirements necessary to keep Personal 
Identifiable Information (“PII”) data secure. To protect clients’ personal information from unauthorized 
access and use, the Company uses security measures that comply with Federal law. We restrict access 
to personal information about customers to employees who need to know such information to provide 
products and services. 
Our penetration testing to address potential new threats continues to evolve, and has bolstered our 
ability to protect against vulnerabilities. Our data security and privacy practices are designed to support 
privacy rights, and are based on industry standards. Everyone at Origin who works with personal 
information has a responsibility to understand and uphold our privacy obligations. To date, we have 
not experienced a cybersecurity incident that has materially impacted our business strategy, results of 
operations, or financial condition. Origin is committed to disclosing any such data breach in compliance 
with relevant laws and regulations, ensuring transparency and maintaining stakeholder trust.
The Risk Committee oversees the major risk exposures of the Company and its business units, including 
cybersecurity. Our IT team uses a combination of industry tools and innovative technologies to help 
protect stakeholders against cybercriminals. We leverage the latest encryption configurations and 
cyber technologies on our systems, devices and third-party connections and further review vendor 
encryption to ensure proper information security safeguards are maintained.
Origin proactively engages with shareholders throughout the year to better understand their priorities 
and perspectives on significant issues, including Company performance and strategy, executive 
compensation, corporate governance, and environmental and social matters. Our Executive responsible 
for investor relations leads this shareholder engagement, considering feedback and insights from 
shareholders and other stakeholders as we review our practices and disclosures. This approach 
strengthens our governance practices and supports long-term sustainability by aligning our strategies 
with stakeholder expectations. 
For more information about Origin’s commitment to sustainability matters, including policies, programs 
and our recent Corporate Sustainability Report, are available on Origin’s website at ir.origin.bank.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
18
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proposal Snapshot
What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked to elect 11 directors to serve until the next annual meeting of 
stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. This section includes information 
about the Board and each director nominee.
Voting recommendation:
FOR the election of each director nominee. We believe the combination of the various 
qualifications, skills and experiences of each of the director nominees will contribute to an effective 
and well-functioning Board. The director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide 
effective oversight of our business and quality advice and counsel to our management.
Director Nominees
Based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, 
our Board, which currently consists of 16 directors, has nominated 11 incumbent directors to serve as 
directors for a one-year term. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, 
including Origin’s lead independent director, have extensively studied the optimal Board size and 
composition in relation to the Company’s continued growth. The recommendation of the Nominating 
and Corporate Governance Committee reflects the Board’s strategic initiative to reduce its size to 
better align with governance best practices. The five directors not standing for election are Jay Dyer, 
Farrell Malone, Lori Sirman, Elizabeth Solender and Steve Taylor. 
We seek directors with strong reputations and experience in areas relevant to the strategy, growth 
and operations of our businesses. Each of the nominees for director has experience that meets this 
objective. In their current and prior positions, each of the director nominees has gained experience 
in core management skills, such as strategic and financial planning, corporate governance, risk 
management, and leadership development. We also believe that each of the director nominees has 
other key attributes that are important to an effective Board, including: integrity and high ethical 
standards; sound judgment; analytical skills; the ability to engage management and each other in 
a constructive and collaborative fashion; diversity of background, experience, and thought; and the 
commitment to devote significant time and energy to service on our Board and its committees.
None of the director nominees were selected pursuant to any arrangement or understanding with 
any person. There are no family relationships among directors or executive officers of the Company. 
Each of the director nominees currently serving on the Board, except Cecil Jones, were elected by our 
stockholders at a previous annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Jones was appointed to the Board on 
October 28, 2024. 
Each director nominee has agreed to serve if elected, and we have no reason to believe that any 
of the director nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. However, if any nominee 
should become unable or unwilling to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a 
substitute by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors.

2025 Proxy Statement | 19
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION  
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee Qualifications and Experience
The following table presents certain information with respect to the Board’s nominees for director. 
Typically, all of the directors are elected on an annual basis at each annual meeting of stockholders. 
Additionally, all director nominees of the Company are also directors of the Bank, the Company’s 
principal subsidiary for so long as they are directors of the Company. 
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
Daniel Chu
Independent 
Founder, CEO & 
Chairman 
Tricolor Holdings
Age(1): 61
Director Since 2022
Board Committees: 
• 	Finance Committee  
• 	Risk Committee
Daniel Chu is the Founder, Chairman, and 
CEO of Tricolor Holdings, a direct-to-
consumer, AI-powered platform, focused on 
serving the underserved Hispanic market. 
Tricolor was named by Inc. Magazine as Best 
in Business for 2022 and has been recognized 
by several major fintech publications for its use 
of artificial intelligence to advance financial 
inclusion to a highly underserved market 
and offer responsible, affordable, credit-
building auto loans to individuals with no or 
limited credit history. Tricolor is a two-time 
recipient of the Fintech Nexus Excellence in 
Financial Inclusion Award in both 2022 and 
2023 and the Finovate Excellence in Financial 
Inclusion Award in 2023.  Tricolor was named 
one of the top entrepreneurial companies 
in America by Entrepreneur magazine for 
two consecutive years in 2019 and 2020 
and was awarded the Auto Finance News 
Award of Excellence in Community Service 
in 2022 and Excellence in Technology in 
2019. Tricolor also has been recognized by 
Inc. magazine for eight consecutive years 
as one of the fastest growing companies in 
America.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, 
Tricolor became the first in consumer auto ABS 
to issue a rated social bond.  Tricolor is the 
only auto lender issuing in the capital markets 
to be certified by the U.S. Department of 
the Treasury as a Community Development 
Financial Institution (“CDFI”). Mr. Chu has 
distinguished himself as a successful serial 
entrepreneur, having founded six companies 
over the past thirty years. Prior to his current 
role, Mr. Chu founded two other firms in the 
auto financial services industry which became 
publicly traded. He has served in the capacity 
of CEO with seven different companies.
• 	B.S. in Electrical 
Engineering from 
Washington University
• 	M.S.in Athletic 
Administration from the 
University of Miami
• 	Mr. Chu’s entrepreneurial 
and management 
experience make him a 
valuable asset to our Board

|  2025 Proxy Statement
20
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
James D’Agostino, Jr.
Independent
Managing Director 
Encore Interests LLC
Chairman of the Board 
Houston Trust Company
Age(1): 78
Director Since 2013
Board Committees: 
• 	Audit Committee
• 	Finance Committee 
(Chair)
• 	Nominating and 
Corporate Governance
Mr. D’Agostino, Jr. is the Lead Independent 
Director of the Company and Origin Bank. 
He has over 50 years of experience in 
numerous capacities in the banking and 
financial services industries. Mr. D’Agostino, 
Jr. founded Encore Bancshares, Inc. in 2000 
and served as its Chairman of the Board and 
CEO from 2000 until the organization was sold 
in 2012. Currently, Mr. D’Agostino, Jr. is the 
Managing Director of Encore Interests LLC, 
which is focused on banking, investments, 
and investment management. In 2013, 
Mr. D’Agostino, Jr. became Chairman of the 
Board of Houston Trust Company, a privately-
owned trust company headquartered in 
Houston, Texas with approximately $10 billion 
of assets under management. 
• 	B.S. in Economics from 
Villanova University
• 	J.D. from Seton Hall 
University School of Law, 
and has completed the 
Advanced Management 
Program at Harvard 
Business School 
• 	Mr. D’Agostino, Jr.’s 
extensive banking 
experience and his 
knowledge of the law 
and the financial services 
industry enables him to 
make valuable contributions 
to our Board
James Davison, Jr. 
Independent
Director
Genesis Energy, L.P.
(NYSE: GEL)
Age(1): 58
Director Since 1999
Board Committees: 
• 	Risk Committee (Chair)
Mr. Davison, Jr., has served as a director for 
Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL) since 2007, 
and currently serves on its Governance, 
Compensation and Business Development 
Committees. From 1996 until 2007, he served 
in executive leadership positions of several 
related entities acquired by, or oversaw 
substantial assets of which were acquired by, 
Genesis Energy, L.P. 
• 	B.S. from Louisiana Tech 
University
• 	Mr. Davison, Jr.’s 
management experience 
in the energy and 
transportation industries 
and his work as a director of 
a publicly-traded enterprise 
enables him to make 
valuable contributions to 
our Board

2025 Proxy Statement | 21
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION  
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
A. La’Verne Edney
Independent
Litigation Partner
Butler Snow LLP
Age(1): 58
Director Since 2021
Board Committees: 
• 	Nominating and 
Corporate Governance
• 	Risk Committee
Ms. Edney has been a litigation partner at the 
law firm Butler Snow LLP since 2018, where 
she practices within the Pharmaceutical, 
Medical Device and Healthcare Litigation 
Group. Ms. Edney is a Fellow of the American 
College of Trial Lawyers, the International 
Academy of Trial Lawyers and the International 
Society of Barristers. She is also a Fellow of 
the American Board of Trial Advocates and 
currently serves as President-Elect and has 
served on the faculties of that organization’s 
Masters in Trial program, where she has 
taught in Iowa, South Carolina, Kentucky, 
and Reno, Nevada. She has also been on the 
faculty of trial academies for the American 
Bar Association and American Board of Trial 
Advocates. She was recognized by Chambers 
USA in 2020-2021 and has been named as 
one of the Best Lawyers in America in the 
area of Mass Torts/Class Actions in each year 
since 2016. She received the Capital Area 
Bar Association’s Professionalism Award in 
2021 and the Mississippi Women Lawyers 
Association’s Lifetime Achievement Award 
in 2019, and was chosen as Lawyer of the 
Year and Distinguished Alumni Lawyer by 
Mississippi College School of Law in 2018. 
Ms. Edney serves on numerous boards and 
committees including the Board of Trustees 
of Mississippi College; the Magnolia Speech 
School board; the Baptist Hospital Board of 
Regents; and the Greater Jackson Chamber 
board. Additionally, she served as the 
President of the Mississippi Bar Foundation 
from 2019-2020. 
• 	B.S. from Alcorn State 
University
• 	J.D. from Mississippi 
College School of Law 
• 	Ms. Edney’s litigation 
experience, community ties 
in our Mississippi market 
and immersion in the 
medical industry provides 
valuable knowledge and 
expertise to our Board

|  2025 Proxy Statement
22
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
Meryl Farr
Independent
President & Owner 
Kennedy Rice Mill
Managing Co-Owner & 
CEO
Neighbors, LLC 
Age(1): 36
Director Since 2021
Board Committee: 
• 	Finance Committee
Ms. Farr is the President and Owner of 
Kennedy Rice Mill, LLC (“KRM”) in Mer Rouge, 
Louisiana, and the Co-Owner and CEO of 
Neighbors, LLC in West Monroe, Louisiana. 
KRM is a state-of-the-art facility and is one of 
the few new rice mills built in the United States 
in the last quarter-century. Envisioning the 
need to bring sustainably grown and organic 
products into the retail rice market, Ms. Farr 
successfully engineered and implemented the 
packaging of organic and sustainably grown 
products for KRM’s 4Sisters brands.
Neighbors, LLC (“Neighbors”) is a leading 
manufacturer/producer of specialized cookie 
dough for fundraising, private label, and co-
manufacturing partners. Nominated by the 
City of West Monroe’s Mayor, Neighbors was 
recently presented with Louisiana Economic 
Development’s “Lantern Award”, recognizing 
manufacturers in Northeast Louisiana. 
Neighbors makes significant contributions to 
the Ouachita Parish economy through capital 
improvements, expansion, job creation, and 
community involvement, recently receiving the 
“Thomas H. Scott” Large Business of the Year 
Award. 
Ms. Farr serves on the Entergy Advisory Board 
and, since 2019, has served on the USA Rice 
Board of Directors and the USA Rice Executive 
Committee. 
Ms. Farr was an Advisory Board Member for 
Origin Bank prior to joining the Board in 2021. 
• 	B.A. in International Affairs 
from the University of 
Georgia with a minor in 
Spanish
• 	Ms. Farr’s innovative and 
entrepreneurial business 
approach, ownership and 
leadership, as well as her 
community involvement, 
provides a valuable skill set 
to our Board
Richard Gallot, Jr.
Independent
President & CEO
University of Louisiana 
System 
Director
Cleco Corporation
Age(1): 58
Director Since 2019
Mr. Gallot, Jr. served as President of 
Grambling State University from 2016 to 2023, 
where he led the University in its initiative to 
increase enrollment and alumni engagement. 
Mr. Gallot, Jr. became President and CEO of 
the University of Louisiana System in January 
2024. He is also licensed to practice law in 
Louisiana. Prior to his role as President of 
Grambling State University, Mr. Gallot, 
Jr. served a term as a member of the Louisiana 
State Senate between 2012 and 2016. Prior 
to serving in the Louisiana State Senate, he 
served three terms in the Louisiana House 
of Representatives between 2000 and 2012. 
Since 2016, Mr. Gallot, Jr. has also served on 
the Board of Directors of Cleco Corporation, 
an electric utility company headquartered in 
Pineville, Louisiana. 
• 	B.A. in History from 
Grambling State University
• 	J.D. from Southern 
University Law School 
• 	Mr. Gallot, Jr.’s experience 
in professional and political 
leadership positions and his 
legal acumen enables him 
to be a valuable contributor 
to our Board

2025 Proxy Statement | 23
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION  
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
Stacey Goff 
Independent
Retired
Age(1): 59
Director Since 2020
Board Committees: 
• 	Compensation 
Committee
Mr. Goff retired in 2024 after serving over 
15 years as Executive Vice President, 
General Counsel and Secretary for Lumen 
Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: LUMN) (“Lumen”) 
where he was responsible for Lumen’s legal 
and public policy functions. He played key 
roles in negotiating and closing numerous 
acquisitions and dispositions that Lumen has 
completed during the past 20 years. 
Mr. Goff also previously led Lumen’s Corporate 
Development, Strategy and Human Resources 
functions. 
• 	B.A. in Business from 
Mississippi State University
• 	J.D., magna cum laude from 
University of Mississippi
• 	Mr. Goff’s experience 
in public company 
corporate governance and 
compensation, in addition 
to his legal expertise, 
enables him to provide 
great value to our Board
Cecil Jones
Independent
Certified Public 
Accountant
Retired
Age(1): 66
Director Since 2024
Board Committees: 
• 	Audit Committee
Mr. Jones is a recently retired audit partner 
with Whitley Penn. He served as the partner-
in-charge of the firm’s  Financial Institutions 
Group for the past ten years. Cecil had 
been an audit partner for nearly thirty five 
years primarily serving financial institutions. 
He has extensive experience in working 
with financial institutions including audits of 
financial statements, IPO consulting, SEC 
consulting, mergers and acquisitions and 
various types of SEC and regulatory matters. 
He is a member of the American Institute of 
Certified Public Accountants and Texas Society 
of Certified Public Accountants. Cecil has also 
been a frequent speaker on accounting and 
auditing matters for financial institutions. His 
experience also includes serving as an audit 
partner for companies in the real estate, retail 
and manufacturing industries.
The Board has determined that Mr. Cecil 
Jones qualifies as an “audit committee 
financial expert” under applicable SEC 
regulations and satisfies the financial 
sophistication requirement under the New 
York Stock Exchange listing rules.
• 	B.S.B.A. in Accounting from 
Missouri Western University.
• 	Certified Public Accountant 
(licensed in Texas)
• 	Mr. Jones brings over thirty 
years of audit experience 
with financial institutions, 
allowing him to offer 
valuable insights to our 
Board, which are crucial for 
the effective oversight of 
our financial reporting

|  2025 Proxy Statement
24
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
Michael Jones
Independent
Certified Public 
Accountant
Sole Practitioner
Certified Fraud Examiner
Age(1): 69
Director Since 1991
Board Committees: 
• 	Audit Committee
• 	Nominating and 
Corporate Governance 
(Chair)
Mr. Jones is a sole practitioner licensed 
Certified Public Accountant with an office 
in Ruston, Louisiana and is a Certified Fraud 
Examiner. He is a member of the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 
the Society of Louisiana Certified Public 
Accountants and the Association of Certified 
Fraud Examiners. 
• 	B.S. from Louisiana Tech 
University
• 	Certified Public Accountant 
(licensed in Louisiana)
• 	Mr. Jones’ ties within the 
local community, business 
experience and accounting 
knowledge qualify him to 
serve on our Board
Gary Luffey
Independent
Medical Doctor 
Allegiance Health 
Management
Age(1): 70
Director Since 2017
Board Committees: 
• 	Compensation 
Committee
Dr. Luffey has been an eye surgeon for over 
40 years and is a medical doctor at Allegiance 
Health Management. Previously, he had been 
a partner at the Green Clinic and a member 
of the its leadership team. Dr. Luffey has been 
a member of the Ruston-Lincoln Industrial 
Development Committee and served in 
a leadership role with the Ruston-Lincoln 
Chamber of Commerce. Additionally, he is 
a member of the National Association of 
Corporate Directors. Over the past 40 years, 
Dr. Luffey has been involved in the ownership 
and management of nursing homes, hospitals 
and medical supply companies. He was 
also a consultant with Alcon Laboratories, a 
subsidiary of Novartis, from 1996 to 2016.
• 	B.S in Biology from 
University of Louisiana 
Monroe
• 	M.D. from Louisiana State 
University-Shreveport
• 	Ophthalmology Residency 
with Louisiana State 
University-Shreveport
• 	Fellow American Board 
Ophthalmology
• 	Dr. Luffey’s extensive 
experience with the 
healthcare industry and 
his community ties in our 
Louisiana markets are 
valuable to our Company 
and our Board

2025 Proxy Statement | 25
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION  
OF DIRECTORS
Director Nominee
Background
Qualifications
Drake Mills 
Chairman, President & CEO
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
Age(1): 64
Director Since 2012
Mr. Mills serves as our Chairman, President 
and CEO. Mr. Mills has more than 40 years of 
banking experience and started out as a check 
file clerk with Origin Bank. Having worked his 
way through the organization, Mr. Mills has 
served in various capacities, including in-
house system night operator, branch manager, 
consumer loan officer, commercial lender and 
Chief Financial Officer. He became President 
and Chief Operations Officer in 1996 and 
was named CEO of Origin Bank in 2003. He 
has served our Company as President since 
1998 and CEO since 2008, and as Chairman 
of our Board since 2012. Under his leadership 
as President and CEO, Origin Bank has 
experienced significant asset growth, primarily 
through organic growth. Mr. Mills served 
on the Community Depository Institutions 
Advisory Council to the Federal Reserve Bank 
of Dallas from 2011 to 2014. He represented 
the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas on the 
Community Depository Institutions Advisory 
Council to the Federal Reserve System in 
Washington, D.C., and was appointed as 
the Council’s President for a one-year term 
in 2013. He is also a past Chairman of the 
Louisiana Bankers Association. Throughout 
his career, Mr. Mills has been extremely active 
volunteering in his local community having 
served in various leadership positions for the 
Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Louisiana, 
Ruston-Lincoln Chamber of Commerce, 
United Way of Northeast Louisiana, Louisiana 
Tech University Foundation, Louisiana Tech 
University College of Business Advisory 
Board, Louisiana Tech University Technology 
Foundation. He has also been recognized as 
the Tower Medallion recipient and Alumnus of 
the Year by Louisiana Tech University.
• 	B.S. in Finance from 
Louisiana Tech University
• 	Graduated from the 
Graduate School of Banking 
of the South in Baton 
Rouge, Louisiana, and the 
Graduate School of Banking 
of the South’s Professional 
Master of Banking Program 
in Austin, Texas
• 	Mr. Mills oversees our 
executive management 
team as well as the 
development and execution 
of our strategic plan. His 
vision and leadership are 
instrumental in our growth 
and success
(1)	
Ages at March 13, 2025.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
26
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
Board Diversity
The Company and the Board believe the diversity reflected in the communities we serve must be 
represented in the composition of the Board itself and is integral and necessary to the effective 
and successful functioning of the Company’s operations. We believe the members of our Board are 
well-qualified and reflect the diversity within our markets, including being representative of the age, 
gender, race, experience and expertise. The table below discloses the demographic mix of our Board 
at December 31, 2024. 
Board Diversity Matrix
Total Number of Directors
16
Female
Male
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors
4
12
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black
1
1
Alaskan Native or Native American
Asian
1
Hispanic or Latinx
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White
3
10
Two or More Races or Ethnicities
Stockholder Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual 
Meeting is required for the election of the 11 director nominees, provided that if the number of director 
nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected at such a meeting, the directors will be elected 
by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote at such a meeting at which a 
quorum is present. The 11 director nominees will be elected if the number of shares that vote “For” 
the election of a director exceeds the number of shares voted “Against” that director. Abstentions 
and broker non-votes shall not be counted as votes cast either “For” or “Against” the election of any 
director. Stockholders shall not have cumulative voting in the election of directors.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE 
“FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE FOR ELECTION TO THE 
BOARD.

2025 Proxy Statement | 27
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION  
OF DIRECTORS
2024 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The biographical information set forth below outlines the background and experience of the Company’s 
NEOs who do not also serve on the Company’s Board. 
NEO
Background
Qualifications
M. Lance Hall
President & CEO
Origin Bank
Age(1): 51
Mr. Hall was promoted to President and CEO 
of Origin Bank in January 2020 after previously 
being promoted to President of Origin Bank in 
July 2018. Mr. Hall oversees the Bank’s regional 
presidents and markets, as well as lending, 
information technology, retail banking, operations, 
marketing, mortgage, and strategic planning. 
Prior to his promotion to Origin Bank President, 
Mr. Hall served as Louisiana State President from 
March 2013 until July 2018. While serving as 
Louisiana State President, Mr. Hall also became 
Chief Strategy Officer in March 2016 and became 
Chief Operating Officer of the Bank in February 
2017. Mr. Hall has served our organization for 
over 25 years through various roles of increasing 
responsibility. Prior to joining Origin Bank, Mr. Hall 
spent four years at Regions Bank as a Credit 
Analyst and Commercial Relationship Manager.
• 	B.S. in Managerial 
Finance from the 
University of Mississippi 
• 	Graduate of The 
Graduate School of 
Banking at Louisiana 
State University
Derek McGee 
Senior Executive Officer & 
Chief Legal Counsel 
Age(1): 44
Mr. McGee joined Origin Bancorp, Inc. in January 
2022 and serves as Chief Legal Counsel for 
the Company and Origin Bank. In this capacity, 
Mr. McGee oversees all legal matters involving 
the Company and Origin Bank and is actively 
involved in formulating and executing various 
strategic initiatives for the Company. From 2010 
through 2021, Mr. McGee served as a partner of 
Fenimore Kay Harrison LLP where his primary area 
of focus was corporate, securities and regulatory 
representation of financial institutions. Prior to 
that, Mr. McGee was an attorney in the financial 
institutions group at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 
(formerly Hunton & Williams LLP). He has extensive 
experience representing financial institutions in 
merger and acquisition transactions and securities 
offerings, as well as SEC reporting and regulatory 
compliance matters. Mr. McGee is a past board 
member of the Independent Bankers Association 
of Texas (IBAT) and the IBAT Leadership Division, 
as well as past Vice Chairman of IBAT’s Associate 
Member Advisory Council. In addition, he is a past 
board member of First Tee of Greater Austin. 
• 	B.B.A. in Finance from 
Baylor University 
• 	J.D. from Southern 
Methodist University 
• 	Member, State Bar of 
Texas

|  2025 Proxy Statement
28
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION 
OF DIRECTORS
NEO
Background
Qualifications
Preston Moore
Senior Executive Officer & 
Chief Credit and Banking 
Officer
Age(1): 64
Mr. Moore assumed the role of Chief Credit 
and Banking Officer in October 2019, and prior 
to this role, he served as our Houston Regional 
President. He has been with the Bank since 
November 2012, when he was the first employee 
hired in the Houston market. Mr. Moore has 
performed various roles in the banking industry for 
more than 42 years, and he has a vast wealth of 
financial knowledge. Mr. Moore formerly served as 
President and Director for Encore Bancshares, Inc, 
and President, CEO, and Director for Encore Bank. 
Before he took on his role at Encore Bancshares, 
Mr. Moore served as the Executive Vice President 
and Manager of the Investment Division at Amegy 
Bank of Texas. Prior to that, Mr. Moore served as 
Managing Director in Debt Capital Markets at 
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 
• 	B.A. in Political Science 
at Washington and Lee 
University 
• 	MBA in Finance at the 
University of Texas
William Wallace, IV
Senior Executive Officer & 
Chief Financial Officer
Age(1): 50
Mr. Wallace joined Origin Bancorp, Inc. as 
Chief Financial Officer in 2022. Mr. Wallace has 
roughly 20 years of experience in the financial 
services industry, most recently as a Managing 
Director and equity research analyst at Raymond 
James & Associates. He joined Raymond James 
in 2011 through the acquisition of Howe Barnes 
Hoefer & Arnett, which he joined in 2010. During 
his time at Raymond James, he was responsible 
for coverage of regional and community banks 
primarily located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic 
and Southeast United States, including Origin 
Bancorp. As a research analyst, Mr. Wallace used 
various mathematical, statistical, and analytical 
modeling techniques to perform detailed financial 
statements analysis and forecasting, industry 
analysis, and equity valuation analysis. Prior to 
Raymond James, Mr. Wallace was an assistant 
vice president at FBR Capital Markets, where he 
assisted in the coverage of primarily mid- and 
large-cap regional and super-regional banks 
and thrifts.
• 	B.A. in Anthropology 
from The University of 
Virginia
• 	MBA from The College 
of William and Mary
(1)	
Ages at March 13, 2025. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 29
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Leadership Structure
The Company has a policy that does not mandate the separation of the roles of CEO or President and 
the Chairman of the Board. Our Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to instead 
make a determination regarding the separate roles of CEO, President and Chairman of the Board on a 
regular basis based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership composition of 
the Board. Our Board has determined that having our President and CEO, Mr. Mills, serve as Chairman 
of the Board is in the best interests of our stockholders at this time. This structure makes best use of 
the CEO’s extensive knowledge of our organization and the banking industry. Our Board views this 
arrangement as also providing an efficient nexus between our management and the Board, enabling 
the Board to obtain information pertaining to operational matters expeditiously and enabling our 
Chairman to bring areas of concern before the Board in a timely manner.
Unless the Company has an independent non-executive Chairman of the Board, the Company’s 
governance structure provides for a strong Lead Independent Director role. The Lead Independent 
Director must be independent under the NYSE rules and elected by the independent Board members. 
Our Board has elected James D’Agostino, Jr. to serve as the Lead Independent Director.
Our Board believes that it is able to have a thorough exchange of views or address any issues 
independent of the Chairman. Among other things, the Lead Independent Director is required to:
•	 Preside at Board meetings when the Chairman of the Board is not present;
•	 Establish the agenda for, and preside at, executive sessions of the non-management and independent 
directors;
•	 Receive topic suggestions from other directors to be discussed at upcoming executive sessions and 
facilitate discussion on key issues outside of meetings;
•	 Act as a liaison and facilitate communication between the Chairman of the Board and the independent 
directors (provided that each director shall also be afforded direct and complete access to the 
Chairman of the Board at any time as such director deems necessary or appropriate);
•	 Facilitate teamwork and communication among the independent directors;
•	 Approve information sent to the Board;
•	 Approve meeting agendas for the Board, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board;
•	 Coordinate the activities of non-management and independent directors, including the authority to 
call meetings of non-management and independent directors;
•	 If requested by any stockholder, ensure that he or she is available for consultation and direct 
communication;
•	 Communicate, as appropriate, with the Company’s regulators;
•	 Regularly communicate with the Chairman of the Board on a variety of issues including business 
strategy and succession planning;

|  2025 Proxy Statement
30
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
•	 Maintain close contact with the Chairs of each standing committee of the Board, and serve as an 
ex-officio member of each committee where he or she is not a member;
•	 Assist the committee Chairs in the establishment of committee agendas and schedules;
•	 Provide input, as needed, into the assessment of the Board committees’ effectiveness, structure, 
organization and charters, and the evaluation of the need for changes; and
•	 With the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, coordinate the annual evaluation of 
the Board and committees’ self-evaluations and the evaluation of the Chairman of the Board and 
the CEO.
Director Independence
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Under NYSE listing standards, 
independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. The rules 
of NYSE, as well as those of the SEC, also impose several other requirements with respect to the 
independence of our directors. In addition, NYSE listing standards require that, subject to specified 
exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate 
governance committees must be independent.
Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and director nominee 
in accordance with the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. Based on this review, our Board 
has determined that 10 of our anticipated 11 directors, or Messrs. Chu, D’Agostino, Jr., Davison, 
Jr., Gallot, Jr., Goff, C. Jones, M. Jones, and Luffey and Mses. Edney and Farr, are independent as 
that term is defined under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. In making this determination, 
our Board considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other 
facts and circumstances that the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including 
the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director and the transactions 
described under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions” and below in 
“Board Meetings and Committees—Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee Interlocks 
and Insider Participation.”
Governance Documents
We have a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy (“Ethics Policy”) in place that applies to all of our 
directors, officers and employees. The Ethics Policy sets forth specific standards of conduct and ethics 
that we expect all of our directors, officers and employees to follow, including our principal executive 
officer (“PEO”), principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Any amendments to the 
Ethics Policy (other than any technical, administrative or non-substantive amendments), or any waivers 
of requirements thereof, will be disclosed on our website within four days of such amendment or waiver.
We have also adopted Governance Principles that set forth the framework within which our Board, assisted 
by its committees, directs the affairs of our organization. The Governance Principles address, among 
other things, the composition and functions of our Board and its committees, director independence, 
compensation of directors and succession planning. The Corporate Governance Principles, our Ethics 
Policy, and information about other governance matters of interest to investors, are available through 
our website at www.origin.bank by clicking on Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.

2025 Proxy Statement | 31
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Education and Self-Assessment
Our Board believes that director education is important to enable it to most effectively perform its 
role of oversight of the management and affairs of the Company. Accordingly, it is our policy that new 
non-employee directors receive an orientation from appropriate executives regarding the Company’s 
business and affairs at the time that the director joins our Board. In addition, within three months of 
election or appointment to our Board, each new non-employee director is invited to spend a day at 
corporate headquarters for a personal briefing by executive management on the Company’s strategic 
plans, its financial statements, and its key policies and practices.
Directors are also provided with continuing education on subjects that would assist them in discharging 
their duties, including: regular programs on the Company’s financial planning and analysis, compliance 
and corporate governance developments; business-specific learning opportunities through site visits 
and board meetings; and briefing sessions on topics that present special risks and opportunities to the 
Company. Additionally, the Company has a director education program to assist board members in 
further developing their skills and knowledge to better perform their duties, including presentations 
made via our board portal. Each director is asked to view the presentation and given an opportunity 
during Board meetings to ask questions. For example, in 2024, presentations on compliance training, 
cyber security and artificial intelligence training, BSA Board training, and Fair Lending training 
were reviewed and discussed. Additionally, courses covering topics such as, regulatory issues and 
compensation trends, fraud prevention, reporting for income taxes, financial accounting and the latest 
issues in the Statements of Cash Flows, were completed by individual directors. Training was conducted 
by qualified employees regarding OFAC and investor relations, among other topics. In addition to 
presentations, our Board subscribes to bankdirector.com, and Dr. Luffey and Ms. Solender have access 
to the NACD. One of our directors, Ms. Solender, has earned NACD Governance Fellow status, which 
requires continuing education in corporate governance.
Board Meetings and Committees
•	 Our Board met seven times during the 2024 fiscal year (including regularly scheduled and special 
meetings)
•	 During the 2024 fiscal year, each of the directors, participated in 75% or more of the total number of 
meetings of the Board and the committees to which he or she was assigned (held during the period 
for which the relevant individual was a director)
•	 We expect all our directors will attend the upcoming Annual Meeting
•	 All fifteen of our then serving directors attended the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders
•	 It is our policy to invite all directors and nominees for director to attend the Annual Meeting
The business of our Board is conducted through its meetings, as well as through meetings of 
its committees. Our Board has five standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation 
Committee, a Finance Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Risk 
Committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below. Members serve 
on our committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board. The standing 
committees report on their deliberations and actions at each full Board meeting. Each of the committees 
has the authority to engage outside experts, advisors and counsel to the extent it considers appropriate 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
32
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
to assist the committee in its work. In the future, our Board may establish such additional committees as 
it deems appropriate, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the Company’s Articles 
of Incorporation and Bylaws.
Risk Management and Oversight
Our Board is responsible for oversight of management and the business and affairs of the Company, 
including those relating to management of risk. Our Board determines the appropriate risk for us 
generally, assesses the specific risks faced by us, and reviews the steps taken by management to 
manage those risks. While the entire Board maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk 
management process, the Risk Committee was formed by our Board to assist in its oversight and the 
Board’s other committees assist in oversight of risk in specific areas. In particular, the Audit Committee 
assists the Board in monitoring the effectiveness of the Company’s identification and management 
of risk, including financial and other business risks. The Compensation Committee is responsible for 
overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive and employee compensation plans and 
arrangements, and periodically reviews these arrangements to evaluate whether incentive or other forms 
of compensation encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by the Company. The Nominating 
and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the risks associated with the independence of our 
Board. The Finance Committee is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the administration 
and effectiveness of market and similar risks. Management regularly reports on applicable risks to 
the relevant committee or the full Board, as appropriate, with additional review or reporting on risks 
conducted as needed.
Audit Committee
The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Malone (Chair), D’Agostino, Jr. C. Jones and 
M. Jones. Our Board has evaluated the independence of the members of the Audit Committee and has 
determined that (i) each of the members is independent under the applicable rules of NYSE, (ii) each of 
the members satisfies the additional independence standards under the SEC rules for Audit Committee 
service and (iii) each of the members has the ability to read and understand fundamental financial 
statements. The Board also reviewed which members of the Audit Committee meet the criteria to be 
considered a financial expert as defined by the SEC rules. Based on its review, the Board determined 
that Messrs. Malone and C. Jones qualify as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert,” as defined under 
the applicable rules of the SEC, by reason of their prior job experience. Mr. Cecil Jones will serve as 
the Audit Committee chairman following the departure of Mr. Malone directly after the 2025 Annual 
Meeting. The Audit Committee held eight meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Our Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting process and the audit of our 
financial statements and assists our Board in monitoring our financial systems and our legal and 
regulatory compliance. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:
•	 Selecting, engaging and overseeing the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, 
including preapproving all services and the fees and terms of engagement. The independent auditor 
reports directly to the Audit Committee; 
•	 Overseeing the integrity of our financial statements, including the annual audit, the annual audited 
financial statements and financial information included in our periodic reports that will be filed with 
the SEC;

2025 Proxy Statement | 33
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
•	 Overseeing our financial reporting internal controls, including discussing with management and the 
independent auditor any significant findings related to the internal control over financial reporting;
•	 Overseeing our internal audit function, including the direct oversight of the Chief Audit Executive, 
who shall functionally report to the Audit Committee;
•	 Overseeing our compliance with applicable laws and regulations related to financial matters or that 
could materially affect the Company’s financial statements;
•	 Overseeing our risk management function related to financial reporting;
•	 Overseeing our procedures for receipt, assessment and handling of complaints regarding accounting, 
internal accounting controls or auditing matters;
•	 Overseeing concerns regarding questionable accounting and auditing, including submissions made 
by employees pursuant to the Ethics and Compliance Reporting (Whistleblower) Policy; and
•	 Investigating matters pertaining to the adherence to the Code of Ethics or other standards of 
business conduct, as such are related to accounting, auditing, financial reporting or internal control 
functions.
Our Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is reviewed annually and 
available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.”
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed Forvis Mazars, LLP, as the independent registered public 
accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year 
ending December  31, 2025. Forvis Mazars, LLP, served as the Company’s independent registered 
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, and reported on the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements for that year.
Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible 
Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee must pre-approve engagements for audit and permissible non-audit services 
to be rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the fees and 
terms of each such engagement. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to its 
Chair, who shall report any final pre-approval decisions, including the material terms and fees of such 
engagement, to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee 
may not delegate to management the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to pre-approve services 
performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
34
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following is a description of the fees earned by Forvis Mazars, LLP for services rendered to the 
Company for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, for purposes of considering whether such 
fees are compatible with maintaining the independence of Forvis Mazars, LLP, and concluded that such 
fees did not impair the independence of Forvis Mazars, LLP. The Audit Committee has pre-approved 
all of the services provided by Forvis Mazars, LLP, and all of the fees described below.
Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Audit Fees(1)
$ 1,192
$ 772
Audit-Related Fees(2)
35
  28
Tax Fees
—
—
All Other Fees
—
—
Total
$ 1,227
$ 800
(1)	
Audit Fees reflect the aggregate fees incurred for services related to the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and review of 
our quarterly consolidated financial statements filed on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, respectively, and other required filings. Audit fees also include 
fees for the audit of our internal controls over financial reporting.
(2)	
Audit-Related Fees include aggregate fees incurred for professional services rendered related to the audits of retirement and employee benefit 
plans.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, none of the total hours expended on the audit and 
review of the Forms 10-K and 10-Q, respectively, and other required filings, by Forvis Mazars, LLP, were 
provided by persons other than Forvis Mazars, LLP’s full-time permanent employees.

2025 Proxy Statement | 35
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Report by Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management of the Company and Forvis 
Mazars, LLP the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the audited financial 
statements for the fiscal year ended December  31, 2024, management’s assessment of the 
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and Forvis Mazars, LLP’s 
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit 
Committee has discussed with Forvis Mazars, LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable 
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit 
Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from Forvis Mazars, LLP required by 
applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s 
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Forvis 
Mazars, LLP such accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has 
recommended to our Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual 
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Farrell Malone (Chair)
James D’Agostino, Jr.
Michael Jones
Cecil Jones
The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not 
to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as 
amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange 
Act”) whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation 
language in any such filing.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
36
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Compensation Committee
The current members of our Compensation Committee are Ms. Solender (Chair) and Messrs. Goff, 
and Luffey. Our Board has determined that each of the members of our Compensation Committee 
is independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of NYSE and the SEC. 
Our Board has also determined that the composition of our Compensation Committee meets the 
requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our Compensation Committee complies 
with, the applicable requirements of NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. The members of the 
Compensation Committee also qualify as “non-employee directors” according to the SEC rules. The 
Compensation Committee held six meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the 
compensation of the CEO and executive officers of the Company. In addition, the Compensation 
Committee oversees the Company’s executive compensation policies, plans and programs. Our 
Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
•	 Annually reviewing and approving the compensation of our CEO, including determination of salary, 
bonus, benefits, incentive opportunities and other compensation, approving goals and objectives 
relevant to the compensation of the CEO and evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of such 
goals and objectives;
•	 Together with the CEO, annually reviewing and approving the evaluation process and compensation 
for executive officers, including salary, bonus, benefits, incentive opportunities and other 
compensation based on an evaluation of each executive officer’s performance against relevant 
goals and objectives;
•	 Overseeing and evaluating executive compensation structure, policies and programs, and assessing 
whether these establish appropriate incentives and leadership development opportunities for 
management succession;
•	 Retaining, or obtaining the advice of, such compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors 
as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate for it to carry out its duties;
•	 Reviewing and approving new or materially amended employment agreements, severance or 
termination arrangements, change-in-control (“CIC”) agreements, retirement agreements and 
similar matters;
•	 Evaluating and making recommendations to the Board with respect to equity-based plans that are 
subject to Board approval. 
•	 Evaluating and monitoring, with the assistance of the Chief Risk Officer, risk management matters 
as they relate to compensation to ensure that compensation practices and incentive compensation 
arrangements are consistent with principles of safety and soundness, do not encourage excessive 
risk taking, and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company;
•	 Reviewing and approving the implementation or revision of any clawback policy allowing the 
Company to recoup compensation paid to executive officers and other employees;
•	 Approving or making recommendations to the Board with respect to the adoption or modification 
of policies regarding the pledging or hedging of Company stock by Company insiders, if any, and 
monitoring compliance with respect to any adopted policy on pledging and hedging;

2025 Proxy Statement | 37
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
•	 Providing strategic review of the Company’s human resources strategies and initiatives to ensure the 
Company is seeking, developing and retaining human capital appropriate to the Company’s needs;
•	 Establishing and monitoring compliance with any stock ownership and holding guidelines of the 
Company that are applicable to executive officers; and
•	 Reviewing Director compensation levels, benefits and practices no less than every other year and 
recommending changes in such compensation levels to the Board as needed.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No members serving on the Compensation Committee during 2024 were officers or employees of 
the Company or any of its subsidiaries and none were former officers of the Company or any of its 
subsidiaries. No member of the Compensation Committee has or had any relationship with the Company 
or any of its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed as a transaction with a related party. Since the 
establishment of our Compensation Committee, none of our executive officers served as a director or 
member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any 
other entity whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee or the Board.
Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures
Typically, the Compensation Committee meets at least quarterly and with greater frequency if necessary. 
The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee, 
in consultation with our Chief Human Resources Officer and other members of the Compensation 
Committee. The Compensation Committee meets regularly in executive sessions. Our Chief Human 
Resources Officer regularly attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and, from time to time, 
various other members of management or other employees, as well as outside advisors or consultants, 
may be invited by the Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide background 
information or to otherwise participate in meetings. The Company’s CEO, the Bank’s President and 
CEO, and the Chief Human Resources Officer also interface with the Compensation Committee in 
connection with executive compensation. The Compensation Committee periodically meets with 
the CEO to assess progress toward meeting objectives set by the Board for both annual and long-
term compensation. The CEO may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or 
determinations of the Compensation Committee regarding CEO’s compensation.
The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees to the extent it 
deems necessary or appropriate. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to 
select, retain and approve the fees and other retention terms of counsel, accountants or other experts or 
advisors, including compensation consultants, at the expense of the Company, that the Compensation 
Committee considers appropriate in the performance of its duties. The Compensation Committee 
also has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any consultants or advisors it engages. 
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may select or receive advice from a consultant only 
after taking into consideration certain factors set forth in the NYSE rules relating to the consultant’s 
independence. Although the Compensation Committee is required to consider such factors, it is free 
to select or receive advice from a consultant that is not independent. See the Compensation Discussion 
and Analysis for additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s consultant.
Our Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is reviewed annually and 
available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.”

|  2025 Proxy Statement
38
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Michael 
Jones (Chair), D’Agostino, Jr., Malone and Mses. Edney and Solender. Our Board has determined 
that each of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent 
within the meaning of the independent director requirements of NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate 
Governance Committee held six meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. 
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee nominates persons for election as directors 
and reviews corporate governance matters. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating 
and Corporate Governance Committee through Board members, management, stockholders or other 
persons. These candidates are evaluated at Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee 
meetings and may be considered at any point during the year. Although, to date, there have been 
no stockholder nominations and the Company does not have a formal policy of considering director 
candidates recommended by stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee 
will consider stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board that have been properly submitted 
in accordance with the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws. Among other things, the Nominating 
and Corporate Governance Committee members are responsible for:
•	 Evaluating and making recommendations to our Board regarding Board size and composition, 
committee structure and assignments, and director responsibilities;
•	 Assisting our Board in identifying prospective director nominees and recommending to our Board 
a slate of director nominees for election by stockholders at each annual meeting of stockholders;
•	 Reviewing the background, qualifications and independence of individuals being considered as 
director candidates, including persons proposed by stockholders or others;
•	 Reviewing and overseeing the management succession program;
•	 Evaluating and recommending corporate governance principles applicable to our Board composition 
and operation of the Company;
•	 Developing and reviewing the Company’s related party transactions policy and reviewing or 
approving related party transactions;
•	 Reviewing and investigating matters pertaining to the adherence to the Ethics Policy or other 
standards of business conduct by any director or executive officer of the Company, except as such 
are related to accounting, auditing, financial reporting or internal control functions, which is the 
responsibility of the Audit Committee; and
•	 Overseeing the Company’s strategy and practices related to ESG. 
Our Board has adopted a written charter for our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, 
which is reviewed annually and available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—
Governance—Governance Overview.”

2025 Proxy Statement | 39
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Finance Committee
The current members of our Finance Committee are Messrs. D’Agostino, Jr. (Chair), Chu, Malone, 
Taylor and Ms. Farr. The Finance Committee met four times in 2024. The Finance Committee has 
responsibility for, among other things:
•	 Reviewing, approving and recommending for implementation our market risk functional framework, 
liquidity risk and oversight policy;
•	 Overseeing the administration and effectiveness of, and compliance with, our market risk functional 
framework and oversight policy and other significant investment and related policies;
•	 Reviewing and overseeing the operation of our Capital Management Policy as well as our capital 
adequacy assessments, forecasting and stress testing processes and activities; 
•	 Reviewing capital levels and making recommendations to our Board regarding our dividend policy; 
•	 Reviewing and making recommendations with respect to the sale or repurchase of debt or equity 
securities, as well as making recommendations regarding the Company’s financing activities and 
significant capital expenditures; and
•	 Reviewing the financial analyses of potential acquisitions and investments.
Our Board has adopted a written charter for our Finance Committee, which is reviewed annually and 
available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.”
Risk Committee
The current members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Davison, Jr., (Chair), Chu, and Ms. Edney. The 
Risk Committee held four meetings in 2024.
Our Board believes an effective enterprise risk management system is necessary to ensure the 
successful, safe and sound management of the Company. The Risk Committee was appointed by our 
Board to assist our Board in its oversight of (i) the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, 
(ii) the Company’s risk appetite statement, including risk limits and tolerances, and (iii) the performance 
of the Company’s Chief Risk Officer. Among other things, our Risk Committee has responsibility for:
•	 Overseeing the Company’s enterprise risk management framework and risk appetite statement, 
including the ongoing alignment of the risk appetite statement with the Company’s strategy and 
capital plans;
•	 Reviewing and evaluating the major risk exposures of the Company and its business units, including 
market, credit, operational, liquidity, legal, cybersecurity, technology and reputational risks, against 
established risk measurement methodologies and tolerances, as applicable;
•	 Overseeing the Company’s risk identification framework;
•	 Monitoring the results of reviews and assessments of risk management functions conducted by the 
Chief Audit Executive;
•	 Monitoring the Company’s complaint management program, including any red flags and/or ethics 
violations;

|  2025 Proxy Statement
40
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
•	 Reviewing and recommending for the Board’s approval annually, and more often as appropriate, the 
Company’s risk appetite statement and, as and when appropriate, the Company’s other significant 
risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies;
•	 Overseeing the Company’s process and significant policies for determining risk tolerance and review 
management’s measurement and comparison of overall risk tolerance to established limits;
•	 Monitoring risk tolerance levels and capital targets and limits as set forth in the risk appetite 
statement;
•	 Regularly reporting to the Board on the adequacy and quality of the Company’s methods for 
identifying, measuring, monitoring, controlling and reporting risks;
•	 Reviewing the Company’s insurance program and the policies in place to address insurable risks, 
including coverages, limits, risk retention, claims, loss histories, and related matters;
•	 Overseeing management’s compliance with all of the regulatory obligations of the Company and its 
subsidiaries arising under applicable federal and state banking laws, rules and regulations;
•	 Reviewing and approving, on an annual basis, the Company’s internal annual compliance training 
schedule;
•	 Reviewing and approving the appointment and, as appropriate, replacement of the Chief Risk 
Officer;
•	 Evaluating the qualifications, performance and compensation of the Chief Risk Officer; and
•	 Coordinating with management, including the Chief Risk Officer, and the Audit Committee to help 
ensure that the committees have appropriate information and resources to fulfill their duties and 
responsibilities with respect to oversight of risk management practices and policies.
Our Board has adopted a written charter for our Risk Committee, which is reviewed annually and 
available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.”
Stockholder Nominees and Proposals for 2026 Annual Meeting
If a stockholder desires to submit a stockholder proposal pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange 
Act for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, such proposal 
and supporting statements, if any, must be received by us at our principal executive offices, located at 
500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270, no later than November 13, 2025. However, if 
the date of the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders is changed by more than 30 days from April 23, 
2026, then the deadline will be a reasonable time before we begin to send proxy materials. Any such 
proposal must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.
Stockholder proposals to be presented at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, other than 
stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, for inclusion in the 
proxy statement (including a director nomination) for the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders must, 
in addition to other requirements, be in proper form and received in writing at the Company’s principal 
executive offices no earlier than December 24, 2025, and no later than January 23, 2026. If the 2026 
annual meeting is not called for a date that is within 30 days of April 23, 2026, notice must be delivered 
not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which such notice of the 

2025 Proxy Statement | 41
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made, whichever 
occurs first. Please consult our Bylaws before sending in a notice as we may disregard proposals or 
nominations not made in accordance with the requirements in our Bylaws.
Director Nominees
Our Bylaws provide that nominations of persons for election to the Board may be made by or at the 
direction of our Board or by any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at the Annual 
Meeting who complies with certain procedures in our Bylaws as described above. The Nominating and 
Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending candidates to our 
Board as vacancies occur.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for monitoring the mix of 
skills and experience of the directors in order to assess whether our Board has the necessary tools to 
perform its oversight function effectively. Director candidates are evaluated using certain established 
criteria, including familiarity with the financial services industry, their personal financial stability, their 
willingness to serve on our Board and our Corporate Governance Principles. In addition, our Corporate 
Governance Principles indicate directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, 
integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders. 
They must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. 
Although we do not have a separate diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance 
Committee considers the diversity of our directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, 
skills, expertise and other characteristics that may contribute to our Board. In addition, the Company’s 
strategic plan includes a focus on attracting Board members who represent a broad mix of skills, 
backgrounds and perspectives that will more closely reflect the diversity of our customer base, 
stockholders and communities we serve.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and 
evaluating nominees for director and regularly assesses the appropriate size of our Board, and whether 
any vacancies on our Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies 
are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Committee considers various potential candidates for director.
Candidates may come to the attention of the Committee through current Board members, professional 
search firms, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings 
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and may be considered at any point during 
the year. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates 
recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it considers candidates recommended by others, 
provided that such candidates are nominated in accordance with the applicable provisions of our Bylaws. 
Because of this, there is no specific policy regarding stockholder nominations of potential directors. At 
present, our Board does not engage any third parties to identify and evaluate potential director candidates.
Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Transactions by Origin Bank or us with related parties are subject to a formal written policy, as well as 
regulatory requirements and restrictions. These requirements and restrictions include Sections 23A and 
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (which govern certain transactions by Origin Bank with its affiliates) 
and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation O (which governs certain loans by Origin Bank to its executive 
officers, directors and principal stockholders). We and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Origin Bank, have 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
42
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
adopted policies designed to ensure compliance with these regulatory requirements and restrictions. 
In addition, our Ethics Policy provides guidance for addressing actual or potential conflicts of interests, 
including those that may arise from transactions and relationships between the Company and its 
executive officers or directors.
We have also adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy. Related party transactions are 
transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we are or will be a participant, the amount involved 
exceeds $120,000 and a related party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Related 
parties include our directors (including nominees for election as directors), our executive officers, 
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital stock and the immediate family members of any of 
the foregoing persons.
Transactions subject to the policy are referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance 
Committee for evaluation and approval. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, 
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, among other factors:
•	 Whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of the Company’s and the related 
party’s business;
•	 Whether the transaction was initiated by the Company or the related party;
•	 The purpose of the transaction and its potential risks and benefits to the Company;
•	 In the event the related party is a director, an Immediate Family Member of a director or an entity 
in which a director is a partner, stockholder or executive officer, the impact on the director’s 
independence and, if the director serves on the Compensation Committee, such director’s status as 
a “non-employee director” under the SEC rules;
•	 The availability of other sources for comparable products or services;
•	 The approximate dollar value of the transaction and the amount and nature of the related party’s 
interest in the transaction; and
•	 The terms of the transaction and whether the proposed transaction is proposed to be entered 
into on terms no less favorable than the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees 
generally.
Our Related Party Transactions Policy is available on our website at www.origin.bank under “Investors—
Governance—Governance Overview.”
General
In addition to the relationships, transactions and the director and executive officer compensation 
arrangements discussed under “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation” and 
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” the following is a description of 
transactions since January 1, 2024, including currently proposed transactions, to which we have been 
or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any 
of our directors (including nominees), executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our 
capital stock, or their immediate family members or entities affiliated with them, had or will have a 
direct or indirect material interest. We believe the terms and conditions set forth in such agreements 
are reasonable and customary for similar transactions.

2025 Proxy Statement | 43
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Ordinary Banking Relationships
Certain of our officers, directors and principal stockholders, as well as their immediate family members 
and affiliates, are customers of, or have or have had transactions with, Origin Bank, us or our affiliates 
in the ordinary course of business. These transactions include deposits, loans, mortgages and other 
financial services transactions. Related party transactions are made in the ordinary course of business, 
on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral (where applicable), as those 
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to us, and do not involve 
more than normal risks of collectability or present other features disproportionately unfavorable to us.
At December 31, 2024, we had approximately $52.9 million of loans outstanding to our directors and 
officers, their immediate family members and their affiliates, as well as those of Origin Bank, and we had 
approximately $4.1 million in unfunded loan commitments to these persons. At December 31, 2024, no 
related party loans were categorized as nonaccrual, past due, restructured or potential problem loans. 
We expect to continue to enter into transactions in the ordinary course of business on similar terms with 
our officers, directors and principal stockholders, as well as their immediate family members and affiliates.
Certain Commercial Relationships
Air Transportation
Ruston Aviation, Inc. is engaged by us from time to time to provide private air transportation to our 
management team. The sole owner of Ruston Aviation, Inc., James Davison, Sr., is the father of our 
director James Davison, Jr.
During 2019, Origin Bank and Ruston Aviation, LLC jointly purchased an airplane from a third party, 
with each party having an equal 50% ownership stake. 49% of Ruston Aviation, LLC is owned by 
James Davison, Sr., the father of our director James Davison, Jr., 49% is owned by Steven Davison, the 
brother of our director James Davison, Jr., and 2% is owned by Ruston Aviation, Inc. The aggregate 
purchase price of the aircraft was $5,162,040. Half of the purchase price was paid by the Bank and half 
was paid by Ruston Aviation, LLC. Ruston Aviation, LLC and the Bank have allocated operating costs 
in accordance with their respective use of the aircraft. We made payments of approximately $47,000 
to Ruston Aviation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, including the Bank’s portion of 
shared operating costs in connection with its joint ownership of the aircraft. In addition, we provide 
outsourced human resources services for Ruston Aviation, LLC for which Ruston Aviation, LLC paid 
us $15,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the last month of 2024, we sold our 50% 
interest in the airplane to an unrelated third party. 
Hospitality and Country Club Membership
The Squire Creek Country Club in Choudrant, Louisiana is owned by Squire Creek Country Club and 
Development LLC, which itself is jointly owned in equal 50% stakes by James Davison, Sr. and Steven 
Davison, father and brother, respectively, of our director James Davison, Jr. From time to time, we use 
the country club for corporate functions, employee and vendor lodging and similar activities. During 
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we paid approximately $330,000 to Squire Creek Country 
Club and Development LLC for these services, and we do not believe we pay more than standard 
rates. In addition, we provide outsourced human resource services for Squire Creek Country Club and 
Development, LLC for which Squire Creek Country Club and Development, LLC paid us $45,000 for the 
year ended December 31, 2024.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
44
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Forth Insurance Leases
Forth Insurance, LLC (“Forth Insurance”), our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary has leased an office 
condominium located at 504 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana, from MNG Properties, 
L.L.C. (“MNG”), which lease was renewed most recently on February 1, 2021, for a ten-year term. Our 
Chairman and CEO, Drake Mills, owns 33.3% of MNG. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 
2024, Forth Insurance paid MNG an aggregate of $151,000 in lease payments. Under the terms of 
the lease, aggregate future lease payments, excluding expenses and assuming exercise of all renewal 
options, were approximately $1.7 million at March 1, 2025.
Forth Insurance conducts operations in Monroe, Louisiana at a location leased from 2200 Tower Drive, 
LLC, an entity in which Peyton Farr, the husband of our director Meryl Farr, is a 40% owner. The current 
term of the lease ends October 2030, with a renewal option to extend the lease for an additional five 
years. The lease provides for a monthly base rent of $27,133 and is subject to certain adjustments. 
We are also responsible for utilities, certain real property taxes, maintenance (except with respect to 
common areas), repairs and alterations. Under the terms of the lease, aggregate future lease payments, 
excluding expenses and assuming exercise of all renewal options, were approximately $3.4 million at 
March 1, 2025. We made payments of approximately $326,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 
2024, in connection with this lease.
Compensation Expense
Peyton Farr, the husband of our director Meryl Farr, and Joe Farr, the father-in-law of our Director Meryl 
Farr, are employed by our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, Forth Insurance, and Tyler Mills, the son 
of our Chairman and CEO Drake Mills, is employed by our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Origin 
Bank. Each of Mr. Peyton Farr and Mr. Tyler Mills received compensation in excess of $120,000 for their 
employment during 2024. 
Perkins-McKenzie Investment
On March 6, 2024, our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, Forth Insurance, made an $800,000 
investment in Perkins-McKenzie Insurance Agency, LLC (“PM Agency”), which represents 20% of 
PM Agency’s outstanding membership interests. Concurrent with this investment, Strategic Agency 
Partners, LLC (“SAP”) purchased 40% of the outstanding membership interests in PM Agency. Peyton 
Farr, the husband of our director Meryl Farr, owns 75% of SAP and due to this ownership became the 
manager of PM Agency upon closing of the investments by Forth Insurance and SAP. Mr. Farr also 
remains an employee of our wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, Forth Insurance. As of December 31, 
2024, Forth Insurance received $190,000 in distributions related to its investments in PM Agency. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 45
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2024
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to our Board 
with respect to the compensation of directors. Employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are not 
compensated for service as a director of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Director compensation is reviewed periodically by the Compensation Committee of our Board 
and adjustments are considered, as needed. Periodically, the Committee engages an independent 
consultant to review director compensation amounts and structure using the same group of peer banks 
that is used by the Compensation Committee to review the compensation of senior management. 
The following table summarizes the committee and other fees/benefits paid to non-employee directors 
during the year ended December 31, 2024:
Committee 
Member Fee $
Committee 
Chair Premium $
Other Annual 
Fees/Benefits $
Cash and Equity Retainers:
  Retainer per director
—
—
45,000
  Equity-based awards per director(1)
—
—
50,000
  Lead independent director
—
—
25,000
Committee Service Fees:
  Audit
6,000
12,000
—
  Compensation
4,000
9,000
—
  Finance
3,000
5,000
—
  Nominating and Corporate Governance
3,500
6,500
—
  Risk
3,000
5,000
—
(1)	
Equity awards are granted to non-employee directors pursuant to Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan in May of each year 
following the annual stockholders meeting and the election of directors. These grants vest on annual meeting date of the following year, 
subject to their continued service on such date.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
46
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid by the Company to non-NEO directors for 
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024:
Name
Fees Earned or 
Paid in Cash 
$
Stock Awards(1) 
$
All Other 
Compensations(2)
$
Total 
$
Daniel Chu
50,125
50,007
—
100,132
James S. D’Agostino, Jr.
84,375
50,007
—
134,382
James E. Davison, Jr.
55,250
50,007
—
105,257
Jay Dyer(3)
43,750
50,007
—
93,757
A. La’Verne Edney 
49,625
50,007
—
99,632
Meryl Farr
48,000
50,007
—
98,007
Richard J. Gallot, Jr.
48,500
50,007
—
98,507
Stacey Goff
49,125
50,007
—
99,132
Cecil Jones(4)
12,750
24,812
—
37,562
Michael Jones
60,750
50,007
—
110,757
Gary E. Luffey
51,750
50,007
—
101,757
Farrell J. Malone(3)
68,875
50,007
—
118,882
Lori Sirman(3)
—
—
799,215
799,215
Elizabeth Solender(3)
59,625
50,007
—
109,632
Steven Taylor(3)
54,000
50,007
—
104,007
(1)	
The amounts shown in this column reflect RSAs granted to the non-employee directors during 2024 and are disclosed as the aggregate 
grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, based on the closing market price of our common stock 
on the grant date. For additional information on our calculation of stock-based compensation, please refer to the notes to our audited 
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)	
The amounts shown in this column are described in the table below and were paid to Ms. Sirman in conjunction with her employment by 
the Company.
(3)	
Not standing for reelection at the 2025 Annual Meeting.
(4)	
Mr. Jones was appointed to the Board on October 28, 2024.

2025 Proxy Statement | 47
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Amount of all other compensation paid to Ms. Sirman in 2024 are set forth below:
Description
Lori Sirman ($)
Base salary
506,000
Short-term incentive
68,600
Stock awards(1)
177,107
Transfer ownership of Company car
17,000
Auto allowance
13,000
Employer 401(k) contributions
10,350
Country club membership dues
7,158
Total
799,215
(1)	
The amount reflects RSUs and PSUs granted to Ms. Sirman and are disclosed as the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards. For additional 
information on our calculation of stock-based compensation and relevant assumptions, please refer to Note 13 — Stock and Incentive 
Compensation Plans to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, included in our Annual Report on Form 
10-K. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is calculated using the target number of PSUs awarded, which was the assumed probable outcome on 
the grant date. Assuming, instead, the highest level of performance achievement on the grant date for the PSUs, the aggregate grant date fair 
value of the awards would have been $132,814.
Directors have been and will continue to be reimbursed for travel, food, lodging and other expenses 
directly related to their activities as directors. Directors are also entitled to the protection provided 
by the indemnification provisions in our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as well as the Articles of 
Incorporation and Bylaws of Origin Bank, as applicable.
Ms. Sirman is an employee of Origin Bank but is not an executive officer of the Company. Ms. Sirman 
was subject to an employment agreement with BTH Bank, which was first amended and assumed by 
Origin Bank on October 7, 2022, and further amended by a second amendment executed on January 1, 
2025, to reflect Ms. Sirman’s new base salary. Under the terms of Ms. Sirman’s employment agreement, 
as amended by the first amendment, Ms. Sirman was to serve as an Executive Vice President of Origin 
Bank for a period of two years following consummation of the merger, with automatically renewing 
one-year terms after that time. Following the expiration of the term provided in that first amendment, 
Ms. Sirman executed a second amendment, which became effective on January 1, 2025, providing for 
an annual base salary of $350,000. Ms. Sirman is eligible for incentive compensation and other benefits 
consistent with similarly situated officers of Origin Bank. The employment agreement, as amended, 
contains certain restrictive covenants and provides for a lump sum change in control (“CIC”) payment 
equal to the executive’s base salary if such executive is terminated within a year of a change of control, 
subject to certain exceptions.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
48
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
The following discussion provides an overview and analysis of Origin’s compensation philosophy and 
objectives, pay for performance alignment and the variables considered when making the compensation-
related decisions for Origin’s NEOs.
This discussion describes the components of the Company’s compensation program for its NEOs and 
should be read together with the compensation tables for our NEOs, which can be found following this 
discussion. Unless otherwise indicated, any references to a particular year in this discussion means the 
fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. The Company’s NEOs at December 31, 2024, are listed below:
Name
Title
Drake Mills
Chairman of the Board/CEO & President of Origin Bancorp, Inc.
William Wallace, IV
Chief Financial Officer
M. Lance Hall
President and CEO of Origin Bank
Derek McGee
Chief Legal Counsel
Preston Moore
Chief Credit & Banking Officer
Key Compensation Committee Actions in 2024
The Compensation Committee took several actions which are consistent with our determination to pay 
for performance and align our incentive compensation metrics to key strategic initiatives.
•	 Reviewed benchmarking data on base salary and incentive opportunities for the CEO and approved 
an increase based on peer market practice. Mr. Mills’ Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) target was 
increased to 80% of salary and his LTIP target was increased to 120% of salary. 
•	 Reviewed peer benchmarking data related to director compensation and recommended an increase 
to both cash and equity compensation, which was later approved by the Board.
•	 Reviewed short and long-term incentive plan designs to confirm they are in accordance with 
shareholder interests and peer market practices; approved metrics for 2024 incentive plans.
•	 Approved 2024 STIP payouts in alignment with individual and corporate financial performance.

2025 Proxy Statement | 49
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION  
AND ANALYSIS
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The quality and loyalty of our employees, including our executive team, is critical to executing our 
community banking philosophy. In order to attract and retain highly qualified and loyal employees, 
we feel it is important to motivate and reward these executives for high levels of performance that 
contribute to long-term shareholder value. Therefore, our compensation programs are designed using 
the following principles:
•	 We are committed to providing compensation and benefit programs that are highly competitive 
within our industry and with other relevant organizations with which we compete for talent.
•	 Our compensation programs are designed to encourage and reward behaviors that contribute to 
the achievement of strategic organizational goals and stockholder value.
•	 We are committed to providing a work culture that promotes respect, integrity, teamwork, 
collaboration, equity, initiative, and individual growth opportunities, which are reinforced throughout 
our compensation programs and practices.
Compensation Best Practice
Our executive compensation program incorporates many strong governance practices as shown below:
WHAT WE DO
WHAT WE DON’T DO
• 	Tie a substantial portion of executive 
compensation to Company performance goals in 
both short and long-term compensation
• 	No “excise tax gross-ups” in the event of a CIC
• 	Engage with an independent compensation 
consultant that provides recommendations and 
advice to the Compensation Committee
• 	No repricing of stock options without stockholder 
approval
• 	Conduct an annual risk review of incentive plan 
compensation to ensure our plans do not create 
risks that are likely to have a material adverse 
impact
• 	No hedging of Company stock is allowed, and the 
pledging of Company stock is discouraged
• 	Maintain a clawback policy for incentive 
compensation
• 	No excessive perquisites
• 	Require executives and directors to maintain 
meaningful stock ownership
• 	No dividends paid on equity unless and until the 
units are fully earned and vested
• 	Utilize minimum vesting periods of at least 3 years 
for equity awards, with 3 year cliff vesting for most 
performance-based equity awards
• 	No incentives that encourage improper risk taking
• 	Engage with stockholders to discuss any concerns 
or objectives related to our compensation 
programs
• 	No single trigger CIC equity acceleration in 
employment agreements or in the Origin Bancorp, 
Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan
• 	Annually review peer and market data to ensure 
compensation levels remain competitive and 
aligned with peers
• 	No guaranteed salary increases and no 
guaranteed bonuses

|  2025 Proxy Statement
50
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
2024 Business and Financial Highlights
In evaluating the Company’s overall executive compensation program and decisions, including payouts 
under the 2024 programs and plan designs for our 2024 programs, the Compensation Committee 
considered a number of factors, including the strategic and financial performance of the Company in 
2024.
Some specific highlights and key accomplishments considered by the Compensation Committee in its 
decision-making process during 2024 included:
•	 Net interest income was $300.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting an increase 
of $809,000, or 0.3%, compared to $299.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
•	 The Company’s fully tax equivalent net interest margin (“NIM-FTE”) remained stable at 3.22% for 
the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 3.23% for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
•	 Provision expense for credit losses was $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting 
a decrease of $9.3 million, or 55.5%, compared to $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 
2023. 
•	 Book value per common share at December 31, 2024, was $36.71, reflecting a $2.41, or 7.0%, 
increase compared to $34.30 at December 31, 2023.
•	 Return on average assets (“ROAA”) was 0.77% for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting 
a 7-basis-point, or 8.33%, decrease compared to 0.84% for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
Return on average equity (“ROAE”) was 6.92% for the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting 
a 146-basis-point, or 17.4%, decrease compared to 8.38% for the year ended December 31, 2023.
•	 Nonperforming LHFI to total LHFI was 0.99% at December 31, 2024, reflecting a 60-basis-point, or 
153.8%, increase compared to 0.39% at December 31, 2023.
•	 Net charge-offs to total average LHFI was 0.18% at December 31, 2024, reflecting an 8-basis-point, 
or 80%, increase compared to 0.10% at December 31, 2023.
•	 For the twelfth consecutive year, Origin Bank has been recognized as one of the “Best Banks to 
Work For” in the United States by American Banker.
Say-On-Pay and Stockholder Outreach
At our annual meeting of stockholders in April 2024, stockholders signaled their support for our 
executive compensation program where 98.0% of the total votes cast approved our 2024 Say-On-Pay 
proposal. The Compensation Committee considered this vote as demonstrating strong shareholder 
support for our overall executive compensation program, and therefore, did not make any significant 
changes to the program in 2024 in connection with the vote outcome. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 51
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Role of Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and CEO
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for the design, implementation and 
administration of compensation and benefits programs for our executive officers and directors. The 
Committee develops and periodically reviews the Company’s overall compensation philosophy and 
strategy, including (a) establishing appropriate levels of compensation, (b) determining the appropriate 
mix between fixed versus incentive compensation and short-term versus long-term compensation, 
and (c) attracting, retaining and incenting highly qualified executive officers within the context of the 
Company’s corporate culture. In addition, the Committee annually approves the CEO’s compensation, 
and in conjunction with the CEO, reviews the compensation of the other NEOs and executive officers. 
Role of the Compensation Consultant
For 2024, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian”), an 
independent executive compensation consultant, to provide advice and relevant market benchmarking 
regarding executive and director compensation. 
Meridian continues to serve as a trusted advisor to the Compensation Committee in areas such as 
pay philosophy, prevailing market practices, shareholder interests and relevant regulatory mandates. 
Meridian’s services for 2024 included:
•	 Review of peer incentive market trends and design practices,
•	 Providing recommendations on the Company’s Peer Group for compensation purposes,
•	 Review of CEO, executive and director compensation compared to peer group market benchmarks, 
•	 Providing an overview of relevant regulatory updates, 
•	 Review and analysis of Proxy Advisor reports, and
•	 A review of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this document. 
The Committee assessed Meridian’s independence in accordance with SEC rules and NYSE listing 
standards to determine that the services Meridian provides are independent and did not present any 
conflict of interest. Meridian did not provide any other services or products to the Company other than 
those services provided to the Compensation Committee. 
Role of CEO
Our CEO performs an annual performance review of executive officers of the Company and provides 
a recommendation to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of each executive. 
The CEO is present for the Compensation Committee’s deliberations and decisions with respect to the 
other executive officers’ individual compensation.
The Compensation Committee meets separately on an annual basis with our CEO to discuss his 
compensation and performance based on the CEO’s annual incentive plan objectives. The Compensation 
Committee evaluates and approves the annual incentive payment for the CEO, and the Chair of the 
Compensation Committee presents the incentive payout to our Board for review in Executive Session.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
52
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Competitive Benchmarking and Compensation Peer Group
The Compensation Peer Group is updated annually by the Compensation Committee. When making 
decisions in regard to the Peer Group, the Compensation Committee relies on competitive market 
data and input from our compensation consultants and management. Selection factors for the group 
also include asset size, industry and geographic region.
The Compensation Committee approved the following 2024 Compensation Peer Group, which consists 
of 20 companies with a median asset size of approximately $12.2 billion at the time of selection.
BancFirst Corp.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.
Southside Bancshares Inc.
Business First Bancshares, Inc.
Heartland Financial, USA, Inc.
Stellar Bancorp
CrossFirst Bancshares, Inc.
Independent Bank Group, Inc.(1)
Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
Enterprise Financial Services Corp.
Renasant Corporation
Triumph Financial, Inc.
FB Financial Corp.
Republic Bancorp Inc.
Trustmark Corporation
First Bancshares, Inc.
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
First Financial Bankshares Inc.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(1)	
Independent Bank Group, Inc. merged with and into SouthState Corporation (NYSE: SSB) on January 1, 2025, with SouthState Corporation 
continuing as the surviving corporation.
Discussion of Executive Compensation Components
Our goal is to provide executives with a total compensation package that is highly competitive with 
the market, aligns pay and performance, encourages executives to remain with the organization and 
helps to drive the Company to desired levels of performance. The following table outlines the major 
elements of 2024 total compensation for our NEOs:
Compensation Element
Objectives
Base Salary
• 	Reward executives for their level of experience, 
responsibility and individual performance
• 	Help attract and retain strong leadership talent
Annual Cash Incentives
• 	Promote achievement of our annual financial goals, as well 
as other objectives deemed important to our long-term 
success
• 	Drive creation of long-term shareholder value
• 	Align management and stockholder interests
Annual PSU and RSU Awards
• 	Promote ownership and achievement of our long-term 
corporate financial goals  
• 	Align management with stockholder interests
• 	Provide long-term retention incentives
Employee Benefits
• 	Provide competitive benefits which reasonably ensure 
the safety and security of our employees in regard to 
employment, retirement, health, paid time off, and death 
and disability protection

2025 Proxy Statement | 53
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Target Compensation Opportunities
The Compensation Committee does not utilize an exact calculation in determining the break-down 
or weighting of NEO compensation among base salary, short-term incentive awards, and long-term 
equity awards. Rather, the Compensation Committee considers all forms of compensation in light of 
the market competition for executive talent balanced with and considering the need to align the goals 
of the executive with those of the Company. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee believes that 
a significant portion of each NEOs’ total target compensation (i.e., sum of base salary, target annual 
incentive and target value of equity awards) should be performance-based and aligned with long-term 
value creation. 
For 2024, 67.0% and 48.0% of the total targeted compensation of our CEO and other NEOs, respectively, 
was either performance-based or at-risk consisting of short-term incentive and equity awards. For this 
purpose, we included time-based RSUs because their value is tied to the performance of our stock. 
Below are charts showing the compensation mix for Mr. Mills and our other NEOs based on their 
respective 2024 total target compensation values. 
CEO Total 
Target Compensation
Salary: 33%
Short-Term
Incentive: 27%
Long-Term
Incentives-
RSUs: 20.0%
Long-Term
Incentives-
PSUs: 20.0%
Other NEO Total Average
Target Compensation
Salary: 52%
Short-Term
Incentive: 24%
Long-Term
Incentives-
RSUs: 12.0%
Long-Term
Incentives-
PSUs: 12.0%

|  2025 Proxy Statement
54
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Base Salary
The Compensation Committee established the NEOs’ 2024 base salary based on the NEOs’ 
performance, experience, effective execution of strategic objectives, level of responsibilities and peer 
group market data. The NEOs’ base salary remained unchanged from 2023.
Name
2024 Base Salary
$
2023 Base Salary
$
Percentage Change
%
Drake Mills
835,800
835,800
—
William Wallace, IV
475,000
475,000
—
M. Lance Hall
600,000
600,000
—
Derek McGee
475,000
475,000
—
Preston Moore
475,000
475,000
—
Short-Term Incentive Plan
The Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) for 2024 was designed (i) to motivate executives to attain superior 
annual performance in key areas we believe create long-term value to Origin and its stockholders and 
(ii) to provide incentive compensation opportunities competitive with the Compensation Peer Group.
The Compensation Committee reviews and approves STIP goals each year with input from management. 
For 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the following STIP performance measures: 
(i) financial measures (weighted 75%) which were comprised of four objective performance goals and 
(ii) individual and strategic scorecard measures (weighted 25%), which were comprised of strategic 
priorities applicable to each NEO. The financial metrics were more heavily weighted than scorecard 
metrics to reflect the Company’s focus on profitability, credit quality, and growth.
The Compensation Committee establishes a target annual incentive award for each NEO expressed as 
a percentage of the executive’s base salary, established by factors such as: the estimated contribution 
and responsibility of the NEO, Peer Group market practices, internal equity and the recommendation 
of the CEO (for all executive officers excluding himself).
The 2024 STIP target annual incentive award opportunities as a percentage of base salary for each of 
the NEOs are shown below. 
STIP Opportunity Levels as a % of Base Salary
Name/Position
Threshold %
Target %
Maximum %
Drake Mills, CEO
40.0
80.0
120.0
William Wallace, IV, CFO
20.0
40.0
60.0
M. Lance Hall, President
25.0
50.0
75.0
Derek McGee, CLC
25.0
50.0
75.0
Preston Moore, CC & BO
20.0
40.0
60.0

2025 Proxy Statement | 55
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
The total annual STIP award paid to each NEO was determined based on the extent to which 
financial goals and scorecard goals were achieved with potential payouts ranging from 50% to 150% 
of each NEO’s target annual incentive award opportunity. There are no payouts for below-threshold 
performance. Performance between payout levels (i.e., threshold, target and maximum) is calculated 
using straight line interpolation.
For the 2024 STIP, the Compensation Committee selected the following financial metrics: (i) normalized 
pre-tax, pre-provision (“PTPP”) ROAA, (ii) normalized net income, (iii) non-performing assets to LHFI, 
including repossessed assets, as defined in the STIP and (iv) net charge-offs to average LHFI. The 
STIP provides the Committee discretion to adjust the metrics to eliminate the impact of nonrecurring, 
unusual or infrequent items or to reflect the impact of unquantifiable events. The adjustments applied 
by the Committee are detailed in the table below. These metrics were chosen by the Committee based 
on their importance to overall financial performance. Individual scorecard goals were updated in 2024 
to reflect each NEO’s strategic priorities. 
The following table provides the calculations the Compensation Committee used for the 2024 financial 
STIP metrics.
At or for the year ended December 31, 2024
Consolidated Company
(Dollars in Thousands)
Calculation of normalized net income
Net Income
$     76,492
  Plus: interest income reversal on relationships impacted by 
    questioned banker activity
1,206
  Plus: provision expense on relationships impacted by 
    questioned banker activity
4,131
  Less: gain on MSR sale
(410)
  Plus: loss on sale of securities, net
14,799
  Less: gain on subordinated indebtedness repurchase 
(81)
  Less: positive valuation adjustment on non-marketable equity 
    securities
(5,188)
  Less: gain on property sale, net of valuation adjustments
(998)
  Plus: operating expense related to questioned banker activity
6,369
  Plus: operating expense related to strategic Optimize Origin 
    initiatives
1,121
  Less: employee retention credit
(1,651)
  Less: income tax expense on adjusted items
(4,130)
Normalized net income
91,660
Compensation Committee Discretionary Adjustment
(14,721)
Normalized net income used for STIP calculation
76,939

|  2025 Proxy Statement
56
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
At or for the year ended December 31, 2024
Consolidated Company
(Dollars in Thousands)
Calculation of normalized PTPP ROAA
Normalized net income
$     91,660
  Plus: provision for credit losses
7,448
  Less: provision expense on relationships impacted by 
questioned banker activity
(4,131)
  Plus: income tax expense
20,767
  Plus: income tax expense on adjusted items
4,130
Normalized PTPP earnings
119,874
Divided by total average assets
9,958,590
Normalized PTPP ROAA
1.20%
Compensation Committee Discretionary Adjustment
(0.04)%
Normalized PTPP ROAA used for STIP calculation
1.16%
Calculation of nonperforming assets to LHFI, excluding repossessed assets, as defined 
  in STIP (“NPA Ratio”)
Total nonperforming LHFI
$     75,002
  Plus: repossessed assets
3,635
Total nonperforming assets
78,637
LHFI
7,573,713
  Plus: repossessed assets
3,635
Total LHFI as defined in STIP
7,577,348
NPA ratio used for STIP calculation
1.04%
Calculation of net charge-offs to average LHFI (“NCO Ratio”)
Net charge-offs
$     14,488
Average LHFI
7,852,622
NCO Ratio
0.18%
Compensation Committee Discretionary Adjustment
0.07%
NCO ratio used for STIP calculation
0.25%

2025 Proxy Statement | 57
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
2024 Financial Measure Achievements (75% of the targeted annual 
incentive opportunity)
Based on 2024 achieved financial results for PTPP ROAA, normalized net income, NPA Ratio and the 
NCO Ratio, the financial portion of the STIP was achieved at 99% of target. The table below shows 
achieved performance against each financial measure’s target goal and the resultant percentage of 
target annual incentive earned.
Financial Metrics
Weighting 
%
Threshold 
Goal
Target Goal
Maximum 
Goal
Achieved 
Performance
% of 
Target 
Annual 
Incentive 
Earned
Normalized PTPP ROAA
30.0
0.93%
1.16%
1.39%
1.16%
100.0
Normalized Net Income
25.0
$61.6 million
$76.9 million
$92.3 million
$76.9 million
100.0
NPA Ratio
10.0
1.20%
1.00%
0.80%
1.04%
90.0
NCO Ratio
10.0
0.30%
0.25%
0.20%
0.25%
100.0
Financial Achievement: 
75.0
98.7
2024 Executive Scorecard Accomplishments (25% of the target annual 
incentive opportunity)
Based on the Compensation Committee’s determination of each NEO’s achievement against individual 
scorecard goals, NEOs earned between 85.6% and 130.0% of their respective target annual incentive 
opportunity.
Name
Position
Weighted 
Scorecard 
Achievement
2024 Accomplishments
Drake Mills
Chairman, 
President, and 
CEO
21.4%
•	 Remained very active throughout the year in 
maintaining and building new investor relationships 
through multiple channels, creating stability in our 
shareholder base while adding new investors or 
seeing long-term investors build bigger positions.
•	 Created, communicated and began implementing 
“Optimize Origin,” which establishes a clear path 
to elite level financial performance.
•	 Implemented a regional leadership structure in our 
insurance agency, further strengthening the culture, 
communication and collaboration among teams.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
58
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Name
Position
Weighted 
Scorecard 
Achievement
2024 Accomplishments
William Wallace, IV
Senior 
Executive 
Officer and 
Chief Financial 
Officer
31.5%
•	 Built financial models that were used as the 
driving force for many of the changes made as 
part of “Optimize Origin.”
•	 Rolled out new market profitability profiles 
that utilize a funding gap/excess calculation 
methodology to more accurately reflect actual 
market profitability.
•	 Created detailed banker profitability reporting 
which provides critical analytics which can be 
used to drive objective decision making.
M. Lance Hall
President and 
CEO of Origin 
Bank
31.2%
•	 Was a driving force behind the continued 
accomplishments in employee engagement 
and culture which is evidenced by being named 
the “3rd Best Bank to Work For in America” for 
2024 by American Banker and the “Best Bank 
to Work For” for 2024 among banks with asset 
sizes of $3B to $10B, in addition to multiple other 
awards throughout our markets.  Our retention 
rate continues to be best-in-class for the finance 
industry, and engagement scores rank among the 
top 10% of Glint customers.
•	 Instrumental in the creation, design and 
execution of Phase I of “Optimize Origin,” 
which included substantial annualized expense 
reductions.
•	 Collaborated with Credit, Market Presidents and Risk 
to reduce risk in our loan portfolio and support our 
strategic decision to stay under $10 billion in assets.
Derek McGee
Senior 
Executive 
Officer and 
Chief Legal 
Counsel
32.5%
•	 Implemented multiple mechanisms for $10B 
readiness, including daily tracking of Federal 
Register with both notification and reporting 
processes, formal communication plan for regulatory 
notifications, assignment of all Federal Reserve 
Bank (FRB) reporting requirements to owners along 
with inventory and attestation and made substantial 
progress on gap assessment, with 85% of high 
priority items being addressed by year end.
•	 Successfully managed multiple corporate 
initiatives in 2024, including (i) managing all 
legal aspects of the sale of the Bank’s Mortgage 
Servicing Rights, (ii) negotiation of an investor 
rights agreement with Argent Financial, (iii) 
negotiation of numerous stock purchase 
agreements enabling the Company to acquire 
additional shares of stock in Argent Financial 
in 2024, and (iv) execution of certain ongoing 
legal engagements which are expected to result 
in material expense savings while appropriately 
addressing legal and regulatory needs.

2025 Proxy Statement | 59
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Name
Position
Weighted 
Scorecard 
Achievement
2024 Accomplishments
Preston Moore
Senior 
Executive 
Officer and 
Chief Credit 
and Banking 
Officer
26.0%
•	 Successfully composed and rolled out five 
regional credit teams across Origin Bank’s 
regional markets.
•	 Contributed to the successful management of 
credit quality through weekly meetings with 
regional Credit Officers, Business and Consumer 
Lending Services and Special Assets to review 
overdraft, past-due loans, exceptions, borrowing 
base report deficiencies, and other credit issues. 
Mr. Moore was instrumental in facilitating 
teamwork and communication between lending 
teams and credit, resulting in continued 
relationship building throughout our markets.
The 2024 STIP cash incentive final payout amounts for each of the NEOs are shown below. STIP bonus 
payments are subject to our Clawback Policy (which is discussed on page 63 of this proxy statement) if 
certain triggering events occur.
Name/Position
Financial 
Factor 
(75%)
%
Individual 
Scorecard
(25%)
%
Combined 
Financial 
Factor and 
Individual
Actual Bonus 
Earned
$
Drake Mills, CEO
98.7
85.6
95.4
637,883
William Wallace, IV, CFO
98.7
126.0
105.5
200,450
M. Lance Hall, President
98.7
124.7
105.2
315,525
Derek McGee, CLC
98.7
130.0
106.5
252,938
Preston Moore, CC & BO
98.7
104.0
100.0
190,000
LTI Plan
We believe an appropriate mix of performance-based and time-based equity compensation rewards 
executives for performance results while aligning the interests of our executives with those of our 
stockholders. Additionally, equity awards provide executives the opportunity to increase their ownership 
in the Company and provide a retention vehicle through the use of a multi-year vesting period.
The Compensation Committee approved the Company’s LTI compensation strategy to ensure the 
alignment of our LTI compensation practices with prevailing market practice and with stockholders’ 
interests. The 2024 LTI program consisted of Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) and equity awards in 
the form restricted stock units (“RSUs”), of equal value. 
The Compensation Committee set each NEO’s 2024 LTI target award value based on Peer Group 
market data. The target LTI values in the table below are based upon December 31, 2024, target 
opportunities.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
60
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
LTI Target Value $
Name/Position
PSU
RSU
Total LTI Target Value
Drake Mills, CEO
501,480
501,480
1,002,960
William Wallace, IV, CFO
95,000
95,000
190,000
M. Lance Hall, President
150,000
150,000
300,000
Derek McGee, CLC
118,750
118,750
237,500
Preston Moore, CC & BO
95,000
95,000
190,000
Performance Based Awards:
In 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of PSUs to each NEO. The PSUs are linked 
to the achievement of ROAA and ROAE against predetermined performance goals over the three-year 
performance period ending December 31, 2026. ROAA and ROAE were chosen as financial metrics 
because the Committee believes these are strong indicators of our performance over a longer period 
of time. ROAA and ROAE are equally weighted. The respective performance goals are based on a 
3-year average calculation for each performance measure, with a range of 85% to 115% of target. 
Depending on achieved performance, a NEO may earn between 50% and 150% of his or her target 
PSUs. If threshold performance is not achieved with respect to one of the performance metrics, no 
payout is made for that performance metric.
Payouts will be interpolated on a straight-line basis between the above described payout levels. The 
number of PSUs earned and vested at the end of the three-year performance period will be paid in a 
like number of shares of our common stock.
The following tables sets forth achievement information, by NEO, on the PSUs granted in February 
2022, that reached their final measurement date on December 31, 2024:
Financial Metrics
Threshold 
Goal
Target 
Goal
Maximum 
Goal
Achieved 
Performance
Actual 
Payout %
ROAA, as defined in LTIP
1.02%
1.20%
1.38%
1.05%
57.13%
ROAE, as defined in LTIP
9.91
11.66
13.41
10.63
70.67
Name/Position(1)
Threshold 
Payout
(#)
Target Payout
(#)
Maximum 
Payout
(#)
Actual Payout
(#)
Drake Mills, CEO
2,333
4,667
7,000
2,981
M. Lance Hall, President
1,396
2,792
4,188
1,783
Derek McGee, CLC
1,256
2,512
3,768
1,604
Preston Moore, CC & BO
878
1,758
2,636
1,123
(1)	
Mr. Wallace’s employment with the Company began after the 2022 PSU grant date.

2025 Proxy Statement | 61
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
2024 Restricted Stock Units
In 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of RSUs to each NEO, which vest ratably 
over a three-year period. The number of RSUs which vest on each vesting date will be paid in a like 
number of shares of our common stock.
Supplemental Retirement and Income Benefits
The Company has entered into individual Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (each, a “SERP”) 
with several of our NEOs. Eligibility to participate in a SERP is limited to senior officers and determined 
by the Board. Currently, Mr. Mills and Mr. Hall participate in a SERP. The SERPs are unfunded and 
designed to be nonqualified deferred compensation retirement plans in compliance with Section 
409A of the Internal Revenue Code. In October 2019, the Company also entered into an Executive 
Supplemental Income Agreement (“ESIA”) with Mr. Hall.
The Company believes these plans provide an effective long-term retention measure in keeping with an 
overall competitive compensation strategy aimed at retaining high performance executives. The plans 
are defined benefit style programs in which the participant is promised a benefit according to a set 
formula and such benefit is paid to the participant (or his or her beneficiary) in equal annual installments 
over a specified period of time as outlined in each individual’s agreement. Vesting requirements are also 
outlined in each individual agreement and are tied to the number of years of service of the executive. 
These plans encourage our executives to remain with the Company for an extended period or until 
retirement. Additional tables on page 72 provide more details regarding these plans.
Origin Bank Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We offer a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), pursuant to which certain 
employees, including the NEOs, may elect to participate. Pursuant to the DCP, participants may make 
deferral elections with respect to their base salary or bonus. Effective January 1, 2025, the Origin Bank 
Long-Term Equity Deferred Compensation Plan portion of the DCP, which allowed the deferral of stock 
units, was suspended due to administrative inefficiencies and its limited benefits for participants. While 
existing grants with deferred elections for the 2024 performance year will remain in place, no new 
equity deferrals will be made under this program going forward. The Company may make discretionary 
contributions to the DCP, which contributions will be subject to a vesting schedule. Unless otherwise 
specified by the Company, such Company contributions will have a 5-year ratable vesting schedule, 
subject to acceleration of vesting in the case of a CIC or the participant’s death, disability or retirement. 
The Company is not currently making any discretionary contributions to the DCP. Participants may make 
individual investment elections that will determine the rate of return on their cash deferral amounts 
under the DCP. Cash deferrals are only deemed to be invested in the investment options selected. 
The DCP does not provide any above-market returns or preferential earnings to participants, and, 
with the exception of any Company contributions, the deferrals and their earnings are always 100% 
vested. Participants may elect at the time they make their deferral elections to receive in-service and/
or separation from service distributions, either as a lump sum payment or in substantially equal annual 
installments over a period of up to 5 years or up to 10 years, respectively. 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
62
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Benefits and Perquisites
We provide our NEOs with certain limited perquisites, including the use of Company cars or car 
allowance, the payment of life insurance premiums, reimbursement for country club dues and certain 
other expenses which we believe is consistent with competitive market practice and aids in executive 
retention.
Executive officers are eligible to participate in the same benefit plans provided to all full-time employees, 
including health, dental, vision, basic group life and disability insurance. The Company also provides 
its employees, including executives, with a 401(k) plan, which currently provides an employer match of 
50 cents on each dollar of employee contributions up to 6% of eligible compensation. In addition, all 
employees, including executives, can participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which 
grants a purchase right consisting of an option to purchase shares at a 15 percent discount.
CIC and Severance Benefits
Our NEOs are generally entitled to certain limited CIC and severance protections. We believe that 
appropriate CIC and severance protections accomplish two objectives. First, they create an environment 
where key executives are able to take actions in the best interest of the Company without incurring 
undue personal risk. Second, they foster management stability during periods of potential uncertainty. 
The CIC and severance benefits payable to our NEOs are discussed under the heading “Employment 
Arrangements, CIC Agreements, and Potential Payments Upon Termination or CIC” below.
Other Compensation Policies and Information
In addition to adhering to the processes described in the preceding sections, the Compensation 
Committee maintains a strong corporate governance culture with respect to executive compensation. 
Over the years it has adopted policies, including those described below, to further align executive 
compensation with performance and what the Company believes is in the best interest of our 
stockholders.
Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risk related to our 
executive and non-executive compensation plans. Annually, our Chief Risk Officer prepares a risk 
assessment of these plans, which includes an analysis of the design and operation of the Company’s 
incentive compensation programs, identification and evaluation of situations or compensation elements 
that may raise material risks, and an evaluation of controls and processes designed to identify and 
manage risk. The Compensation Committee includes this risk assessment in its evaluation and review 
of the policies and practices of compensating our employees, including executives and non-executive 
employees. Based on its evaluation, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation 
plans and practices are not likely to create risks that could have a material adverse effect on the 
Company. The compensation plans and practices are subject to review and modification by the 
Compensation Committee on an annual basis.

2025 Proxy Statement | 63
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Executive and Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Directors and executive officers are subject to Stock Ownership Guidelines which are designed to 
align their interests with those of stockholders. In this regard, the Board has adopted minimum stock 
ownership guidelines, which provide that executives and non-employee directors should beneficially 
own at least the number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to the values specified 
in the table below. At December 31, 2024, all executives and directors were in compliance with the 
ownership guidelines.
Title
Multiple of Base 
Salary
Chairman and CEO of the Company
5x
President and CEO of Origin Bank
3x
Senior Executive Officers
2x 
Executive Vice Presidents
1x
Non-Employee Directors
5x annual cash retainer
Beneficial ownership of shares of common stock shall be determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 
promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; provided, however, that 
(i) shares shall be deemed to be beneficially owned notwithstanding a disclaimer of such ownership, 
(ii) unvested RSAs and time-based RSUs shall be deemed to be beneficially owned, and (iii) neither 
stock options nor performance-based RSUs (i.e., PSUs) shall be included in such calculation. 
Executives and non-employee directors will not be considered out of compliance with these stock 
ownership guidelines prior to attaining sufficient shares to meet the applicable stock ownership 
guidelines. However, each executive and non-employee director is prohibited from selling shares of 
common stock unless such individual has attained his or her applicable stock ownership guideline. 
Additionally, each executive and non-employee director is expected to continuously own sufficient 
shares to meet the applicable guideline once attained (except for shares withheld to pay withholding 
taxes or the exercise price of options). If an individual falls below the applicable guideline due solely to 
a decline in the market value of shares of common stock, the individual will not be required to acquire 
additional shares to meet the guideline, but he or she will be required to retain all shares then held 
(except for shares withheld to pay withholding taxes or the exercise price of options) until such time as 
the executive again complies with the applicable guideline.
Clawbacks for Any Restatement; Executive Compensation Recovery Policy
Our clawback policy complies with final rules adopted by the SEC implementing the incentive-based 
recovery provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and is consistent with standards adopted by the NYSE. Our 
policy requires the reasonably prompt recovery of incentive-based compensation received by any current 
or former executive officer in the event we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to 
erroneously reporting financial information. This policy is triggered by both “Big R” restatements and 
“little r” restatements and requires recovery regardless of fault or responsibility for the error or resulting 
restatement. Indemnification of any executive officer against recovery under the policy is not allowed.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
64
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Insider Trading Policy and Restrictions
We have adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase, sale or other disposition of Origin 
securities by our directors, officers and employees that is designed to promote compliance with insider 
trading laws, rules and regulations and NYSE listing standards. Our policy is available on our website 
at www.origin.bank under “Investors—Governance—Governance Overview.” 
While the Origin Bank Omnibus Equity Plan does contemplate the granting of stock options, we 
have not recently, and do not currently, grant stock options. In the event we consider granting stock 
options in the future, we would develop policies and practices to, in part, avoid any conflict of interest, 
specifically as it relates to the timing of such grants and material nonpublic information.
Hedging Transactions. Our Insider Trading Policy does not allow Covered Persons (as defined therein, 
including directors, officers and employees and certain of their family and household members and 
controlled entities) to engage in hedging or monetization transactions involving Origin securities, such 
as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds, or similar transactions.
Margin Accounts. Covered Persons are not permitted to hold Company securities in a margin account.
Pledged Securities. Under our Insider Trading Policy, Covered Persons are generally discouraged 
from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. A Covered Person who wishes to pledge 
Company securities as collateral for a loan (not including margin debt) and clearly demonstrates the 
financial capacity to repay the loan without resorting to the pledged securities may engage in such a 
transaction with the prior approval of a compliance officer under the policy at least ten business days 
prior to the proposed execution of documents evidencing the proposed pledge.

2025 Proxy Statement | 65
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS
Report of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained 
in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon this review and our discussions, the Origin 
Bancorp, Inc. Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion 
and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and be incorporated by reference in its Annual Report 
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Elizabeth Solender (Chair)
Stacey Goff
Gary Luffey
The foregoing report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be 
incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, 
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language 
in any such filing.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
66
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to each of our NEOs for 
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Except as set forth in the notes to the table, 
all cash compensation for each of our NEOs was paid by the Company. There were no option awards 
granted to the NEOs for the periods disclosed below.
Name and Principal 
Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Non-Equity 
Incentive 
Plan
($)(3)
Change in 
Pension 
Value and 
Nonqualified 
Deferred 
Compensation 
Earnings
($)(4)
All Other 
Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
Drake Mills
Chairman of the Board/
CEO & President of 
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
2024
835,800
—
1,002,988
637,883
4,899
63,093
2,544,663
2023
835,800
—
417,884
408,158
—
60,649
1,722,491
2022
835,800
—
8,642,860(6)
554,481
126,437
58,694
10,218,272
William Wallace, IV(7) 
Chief Financial Officer
2024
475,000
—
190,054
200,450
—
10,350
875,854
2023
475,000
—
189,954
175,358
—
9,900
850,212
2022
188,921
250,000
500,026
95,145
—
4,750
1,038,842
M. Lance Hall
President and CEO of 
Origin Bank
2024
600,000
—
300,044
315,525
—
33,772
1,249,341
2023
600,000
—
299,996
278,006
—
30,527
1,208,529
2022
541,667
—
249,996
368,048
87,375
29,762
1,276,848
Derek McGee(8) 
Chief Legal Counsel 
2024
475,000
—
237,552
252,938
—
37,702
1,003,192
2023
475,000
—
237,444
220,682
—
36,146
969,272
2022
458,542
50,000
724,915
294,340
—
35,798
1,563,595
Preston Moore 
Chief Credit & Banking 
Officer
2024
475,000
—
190,054
190,000
—
38,510
893,564
2023
475,000
—
189,954
176,071
—
38,060
879,085
2022
460,417
—
157,412
209,156
—
37,310
864,295
(1)	
The amounts paid to Mr. Wallace and Mr. McGee reflect sign-on bonuses paid in conjunction with their employment offers. 
(2)	
The amounts shown in this column reflect RSUs and PSUs granted to the NEOs and are disclosed as the aggregate grant date fair value 
of the awards. For additional information on our calculation of stock-based compensation and relevant assumptions, please refer to the 
Note 13 — Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, 
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. For PSUs, other than the special one-time awards granted to our CEO in 2022 (the “CEO One-
Time Award”), the grant date fair value is calculated using the target number of PSUs awarded, which was the assumed probable outcome 
on the grant date. Assuming, instead, the highest level of performance achievement on the grant date for the PSUs granted during 2024, 
the aggregate grant date fair value of total stock awards would have been as follows: Mr. Mills $1,253,719, Mr. Wallace $237,551, Mr. Hall 
$375,022, Mr. McGee $296,940, and Mr. Moore $237,551.  
(3)	
The amounts shown in this column represent STIP payouts which are earned for performance in the year shown and were determined based 
on the achievement of certain Company performance goals, specific individual goals, objectives and Company risk management goals. 
For more information about our annual incentive awards, see Short-Term Incentive Plan. Achievement of 2024 incentives was finalized at 
the Compensation Committee meeting in February 2025.

2025 Proxy Statement | 67
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(4)	
Includes the positive change in the present value of the accumulated benefits under the SERP and ESIA, which is a non-cash amount that 
can vary from year to year based upon the underlying assumptions. Assumptions such as discount rate, retirement age and mortality age 
are reviewed annually by the Company and are intended to be individually appropriate. The pension value and nonqualified deferred 
compensation earnings decreased $64,070 for Mr. Hall, during the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to the 
change in the pension discount rate to 5.0% from 4.5% during the year ended December 31, 2024. The pension value and nonqualified deferred 
compensation earnings decreased $487,631 and $407,429 for Mr. Mills and Mr. Hall, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2023. 
The decrease was primarily due to the increase in the pension discount rate to 4.5% from 3.0% during the year ended December 31, 2023.
(5)	
The amounts shown in this column for 2024 are composed of the amount of perquisites and other compensation described in the table 
below.
(6)	
The fair value of the CEO One-Time Award was determined using a Monte-Carlo Simulation as the award has graded vesting requirements 
based upon the achievement of certain market conditions. Assuming, instead, the highest level of performance achievement on the grant 
date, the aggregate grant date fair value of the CEO One-Time Award would have been $4,783,329.
(7)	
The amount included in the 2022 stock award column includes a $500,026 RSU grant issued as a sign-on bonus under the terms of his 
employment offer. 
(8)	
The amount included in the 2022 stock award column includes a $499,991 RSU grant issued as a sign-on bonus under the terms of his 
employment offer. 
Amounts of perquisites and other compensation paid to our NEOs in 2024 are set forth below:
Description
Mills
($)
Wallace 
($)
Hall
($)
McGee 
($)
Moore
($)
Personal use of company car
14,832
—
15,683
—
—
Auto allowance
—
—
—
12,000
9,000
Employer 401(k) contributions
10,350
10,350
10,350
10,350
10,350
Bank-owned life insurance(1)
6,703
—
541
—
—
Life insurance(2)
24,010
—
—
—
—
Country club membership dues
7,198
—
7,198
15,352
19,160
Total
63,093
10,350
33,772
37,702
38,510
(1)	
Represents the taxable value of Bank-owned life insurance benefits. Details of our plans are described below under the subheading 
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Plans.
(2)	
Represents premiums for a life insurance policy that provides a death benefit to Mr. Mills’ beneficiary. 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
68
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides supplemental information relating to grants of plan-based awards made 
during 2024 to help explain information provided above in our Summary Compensation Table. This table 
presents information regarding all grants of plan-based awards occurring during 2024. All of the RSUs 
and PSUs shown in the table below were granted under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Name
Grant 
Date
Estimated Future Payouts 
Under Non-Equity Incentive 
Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
All Other
Stock 
Awards: 
Number of 
Shares of 
Stock Units 
(#)
Grant 
Date Fair 
Value of 
Stock 
Awards 
($)(1)
Threshold
($)
Target 
($)
Maximum 
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target 
(#)
Maximum 
(#)
Drake Mills
  RSUs
5/20/2024 (2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
15,183
501,494
  PSUs
5/20/2024 (3)
—
—
—
7,591
15,183
22,774
—
501,494
  STIP
334,320
668,640
1,002,960
—
—
—
—
—
William Wallace, IV
  RSUs
5/20/2024 (2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,877
95,027
  PSUs
5/20/2024 (3)
—
—
—
1,438
2,877
4,315
—
95,027
  STIP
95,000
190,000
285,000
—
—
—
—
—
M. Lance Hall
  RSUs
5/20/2024 (2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,542
150,022
  PSUs
5/20/2024 (3)
—
—
—
2,270
4,542
6,812
—
150,022
  STIP
150,000
300,000
450,000
—
—
—
—
—
Derek McGee
  RSUs
5/20/2024 (2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,596
118,776
  PSUs
5/20/2024 (3)
—
—
—
1,798
3,596
5,394
—
118,776
  STIP
118,750
237,500
356,250
—
—
—
—
—
Preston Moore
  RSUs
5/20/2024 (2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,877
95,027
  PSUs
5/20/2024 (3)
—
—
—
1,438
2,877
4,315
—
95,027
  STIP
95,000
190,000
285,000
—
—
—
—
—
(1)	
The amounts are disclosed as the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, based on 
the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is calculated using the target number 
of PSUs awarded, which was the assumed probable outcome on the grant date.
(2)	
RSU awards vest annually in 33.3% increments with the final tranche vesting on May 20, 2027.
(3)	
PSU awards are scheduled to vest on February 20, 2027, and the number of shares that vests depends on actual performance during the three-
year performance period. NEOs will earn 150% of the target number of shares if the actual performance is at or above 115.0% of the target, 
100% of the target number of shares will be earned if the actual performance is at 100% of the target, 50% of the target number of shares will 
be earned if the actual performance is at 85% of the target and no shares will be earned if the achievement is below 85% of the target.

2025 Proxy Statement | 69
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by each of our 
NEOs at December 31, 2024. RSAs, RSUs and PSUs shown in the table below that were granted prior 
to 2024, were granted under the 2012 Plan, 2024 grants were granted under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 
Omnibus Incentive Plan. None of the NEOs hold any stock options.
Stock Awards
Name
Grant Date
Number of 
Shares or Units 
of Stock That 
Have Not 
Vested
(#)
Market Value 
of Shares or 
Units of Stocks 
That Have Not 
Vested(1)
($)
Equity 
Incentive 
Plan Awards: 
Number of 
Unearned 
Shares, Units 
or Other Rights 
That Have Not 
Vested (#)(2)
Equity 
Incentive Plan 
Awards: Market 
or Payout Value 
of Unearned 
Shares or Units 
of Stocks That 
Have Not 
Vested ($)(1)
Drake Mills
2/18/2022(3)
— 
— 
1,556
51,799
2/18/2022(4)
— 
— 
2,981
99,237
12/13/2022(5)
129,736
4,318,911
— 
— 
12/13/2022(6)
129,735
4,318,878
— 
— 
2/17/2023(7)
— 
— 
3,514
116,981
2/17/2023(8)
— 
— 
2,635
87,719
5/20/2024(9)
— 
— 
15,183
505,442
5/20/2024(10)
— 
— 
22,774
758,146
William Wallace, IV 
8/19/2022(11)
6,678
222,311
— 
— 
2/17/2023(7)
— 
— 
1,598
53,197
2/17/2023(8)
— 
— 
1,198
39,881
5/20/2024(9)
— 
— 
2,877
95,775
5/20/2024(10)
— 
— 
4,315
143,646
M. Lance Hall
2/18/2022(3)
—
—
931
30,993
2/18/2022(4)
—
—
1,783
59,356
2/17/2023(7)
—
—
2,523
83,991
2/17/2023(8)
—
—
1,892
62,985
5/20/2024(9)
—
—
4,542
151,203
5/20/2024(10)
—
—
6,812
226,771

|  2025 Proxy Statement
70
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stock Awards
Name
Grant Date
Number of 
Shares or Units 
of Stock That 
Have Not 
Vested
(#)
Market Value 
of Shares or 
Units of Stocks 
That Have Not 
Vested(1)
($)
Equity 
Incentive 
Plan Awards: 
Number of 
Unearned 
Shares, Units 
or Other Rights 
That Have Not 
Vested (#)(2)
Equity 
Incentive Plan 
Awards: Market 
or Payout Value 
of Unearned 
Shares or Units 
of Stocks That 
Have Not 
Vested ($)(1)
Derek McGee
2/18/2022(3)
— 
— 
837
27,864
2/18/2022(4)
— 
— 
1,604
53,397
2/18/2022(12)
6,702
223,110
— 
— 
2/17/2023(7)
— 
— 
1,997
66,480
2/17/2023(8)
— 
— 
1,497
49,835
5/20/2024(9)
— 
— 
3,596
119,711
5/20/2024(10)
— 
— 
5,394
179,566
Preston Moore
2/18/2022(3)
—
—
586
19,508
2/18/2022(4)
—
—
1,123
37,385
2/17/2023(7)
—
—
1,598
53,197
2/17/2023(8)
—
—
1,198
39,881
5/20/2024(9)
—
—
2,877
95,775
5/20/2024(10)
—
—
4,315
143,646
(1)	
Market value is determined by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2024, by the number of shares 
or units that have not vested.
(2)	
PSUs in the table above are shown at the final outcome for 2022 grants, at threshold for 2023 grants and at maximum for 2024 grants, for 
both the ROAA performance group and the ROAE performance group.
(3)	
RSU awards that vest annually in 33.3% increments with the final tranche vesting on February 18, 2025.
(4)	
PSU awards are scheduled to vest on February 18, 2025. The number of shares represents the final shares to be issued at vesting, based on 
the actual performance during the three-year performance period.
(5)	
The RSU component of the CEO One-Time Award vests 20% on each of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh anniversaries of the grant 
date, starting with the first vest date of December 13, 2025.
(6)	
PSU component of the CEO One-Time Award vests based on achievement of five pre-established stock price hurdles during a seven-year 
performance period beginning on December 13, 2022. Each of the five tranches of PSUs will vest on the later of the date that the applicable 
stock price hurdle is achieved or the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh anniversaries of the grant date.
(7)	
RSU awards that vest annually in 33.3% increments with the final tranche vesting on February 17, 2026.
(8)	
PSU awards are scheduled to vest on February 17, 2026. The number of shares that may vest depends on actual performance during the three-
year performance period. NEOs may earn up to 150% of the target number of shares if the actual performance is at or above 115% of the 
target, 100% of the target number of shares will be earned if the actual performance is at 100% of the target, 50% of the target number of shares 
will be earned if the actual performance is at 85% of the target and no shares will be earned if the achievement is below 85% of the target.
(9)	
RSU awards that vest annually in 33.3% increments with the final tranche vesting on May 20, 2027.
(10)	
PSU awards are scheduled to vest on February 20, 2027. The number of shares that may vest depends on actual performance during the three-
year performance period. NEOs may earn up to 150% of the target number of shares if the actual performance is at or above 115% of the 
target, 100% of the target number of shares will be earned if the actual performance is at 100% of the target, 50% of the target number of shares 
will be earned if the actual performance is at 85% of the target and no shares will be earned if the achievement is below 85% of the target.
(11)	
RSU awards that vest annually in 20% increments with the final tranche vesting on August 18, 2027.
(12)	
RSU awards that vest annually in 20% increments with the final tranche vesting on February 18, 2027.

2025 Proxy Statement | 71
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2024 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table summarizes the stock awards that vested during 2024 for the NEOs. There were no 
stock options vested, exercised or awarded during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, for any 
of the NEOs. The amounts reflected below show the number of shares acquired at the time of vesting. 
The amounts reported as value realized on vesting are shown on a before-tax basis.
Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares 
Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized 
on Vesting(1) ($)
Drake Mills
7,439
229,876
William Wallace, IV 
3,024
94,714
M. Lance Hall
4,255
131,233
Derek McGee
4,068
123,789
Preston Moore(2)
1,384
42,115
(1)	
Value is determined by multiplying the closing market price on the date of vest by the number of shares acquired upon vesting.
(2)	
Includes 798 shares, with a value realized on vesting of $24,283, that have vested but remain subject to deferral and will not be issued until 
the applicable settlement date in accordance with the deferral election.
Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”)
In 2024, our Board adopted the Omnibus Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our April 
2024 annual meeting and is primarily administered by the Compensation Committee. The Omnibus 
Plan replaced the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.
The equity grants that may be awarded under the Omnibus Plan consist of options, stock appreciation 
rights, RSAs, RSUs, deferred stock units, PSUs, other stock-based awards or any other right or interest 
relating to stock or cash. Eligible participants include employees, officers, directors or consultants of 
the Company or affiliates.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Executive Supplemental 
Income Agreement
The SERP is limited to eligible executive employees as determined by our Board. The intent of the 
Company is to assist NEOs with meeting retirement needs while providing an overall total compensation 
and benefits package that aligns pay with performance and is competitive in the market. The terms 
“Cause,” “Good Reason,” “CIC,” “Separation from Service” and “Accrued Liability Retirement Balance” 
are defined in the respective employment agreements with each NEO. Messrs. McGee, Moore and 
Wallace do not have either a SERP or an ESIA.

|  2025 Proxy Statement
72
Name
Plan Name
Number of Years 
of Credited 
Service 
(#)
Present Value(1) 
of Accumulated 
Benefit at 
12/31/2024
($)
Payments 
During Last 
Fiscal Year
($)
Drake Mills(2)
SERP
23
3,800,626
—
M. Lance Hall(3)
SERP
22
929,179
—
M. Lance Hall(4)
ESIA
5
211,315
—
(1)	
Please see Note 14 - Employee Benefit Plans in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 
10-K for more information.
(2)	
The present value of accumulated benefit for Mr. Mills is calculated using annual installments of $264,040 in the first year after retirement, 
with an annual 1.5% cost of living adjustment (“COLA”) increase, based upon the MP-2015 mortality tables, and paid until death.
(3)	
The present value of accumulated benefit for Mr. Hall is calculated using annual installments of 118,939 in the first year after retirement, 
with an annual 1.5% COLA increase, based upon the MP-2015 mortality tables, and paid until death.
(4)	
The present value of accumulated benefit is calculated at December 31, 2024, based on 10% of Mr. Hall’s salary at distribution age 60 using 
a 5.0% discount rate and is payable over six years. For purposes of the present value calculation, the salary at December 31, 2024, was used.
Mr. Mills’ SERP, the Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Plan, effective May 1, 
2008, provides for certain benefits in connection with his retirement or a CIC. Upon attainment of 
his retirement date, which is the later of the date when he attains the age of 65 or his separation 
from service, Mr. Mills will receive an annual benefit of $264,040 that will increase by 1.5% each year, 
paid in equal installments until Mr. Mills’ death. Subject to the terms of the plan, if Mr. Mills dies, his 
designated beneficiary will receive the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance in a lump sum. If Mr. Mills’ 
employment terminates voluntarily or without Cause prior to the age of 65, Mr. Mills will receive, 
over three annual installments, an amount equal to the balance, on the date of his termination, of the 
Accrued Liability Retirement Balance. In the event Mr. Mills becomes disabled prior to retirement, 
he will receive all of his Accrued Liability Retirement Balance in a lump sum thirty days following his 
disability. Upon a CIC, Mr. Mills will receive such benefit as if he had been continuously employed and 
retired at the age of 65 and payments will commence on the first day of the month following the date 
Mr. Mills turns 65. If Mr. Mills is terminated for Cause at any time, notwithstanding any other provision 
in the plan to the contrary, he will forfeit all benefits under the plan and the plan will terminate.
Mr. Hall’s Section §409A Amended & Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement, effective 
January 1, 2005, will pay, upon Mr. Hall’s retirement on or after he attains the of age 65 (“Hall Retirement 
Date”), an annual benefit of 118,939 that will increase by 1.5% each year, paid in equal installments 
until Mr. Hall’s death. If Mr. Hall dies while actively employed by the Bank or prior to the Hall Retirement 
Date, his designated beneficiary will receive the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance in a lump sum. If 
Mr. Hall is terminated without Cause or resigns prior to the age of 65, Mr. Hall will receive, as severance 
compensation over 15 annual installments, an amount equal to the accrued balance with interest, on 
the date of his termination, of Mr. Hall’s liability reserve account. Upon a CIC, if Mr. Hall is terminated, 
except for Cause, he will receive the annual benefit as if he had retired at the age of 65. If Mr. Hall is 
terminated for Cause at any time, notwithstanding any other provision in the plan to the contrary, he 
will forfeit all benefits under the plan.
The Company entered into an Executive Supplemental Income Agreement with Mr. Hall, effective 
October 29, 2019, which provides for an annual amount equal to ten percent of Mr. Hall’s annualized 
base salary, beginning at the age of 60. The annual payments will begin within thirty days following 
Mr. Hall attaining the age of 60 and continue annually for six years. If Mr. Hall dies before 60, he will not 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 73
receive any benefit, but if he dies after attaining the age of 60, any remaining payments will be paid to 
his beneficiary. If Mr. Hall is terminated involuntarily without Cause or experiences a Separation from 
Service for Good Reason or becomes disabled, he will receive 100% of the Accrued Liability Retirement 
Balance as of the effective date of the termination or disability. If Mr. Hall experiences a voluntary 
Separation from Service, he will receive the vested benefit of the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance 
as of the effective date of termination. Mr. Hall’s interest, prior to turning 60, shall vest based on each 
fully completed year of service after the effective date of the ESIA during which he is employed full-
time with the sixth year of vesting being the first year in which Mr. Hall’s interest will become partially 
vested. If Mr. Hall experiences an involuntary Separation from Service within 24 months following a 
CIC, other than for Cause, he will be paid the present value of the benefit provided under the plan in 
one lump payment within thirty days following his termination. In certain limited circumstances, Mr. Hall 
may be permitted to draw on his benefit early. 
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Plans
The Company has purchased Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) on the life of certain NEOs and has 
entered into split dollar life insurance agreements that provide a life insurance benefit to the NEO’s 
designated beneficiary as described in the paragraphs below. Messrs. McGee, Moore and Wallace do 
not have split dollar life insurance agreements.
Name 
Agreement 
Effective Date 
Death Benefit 
Payable to Beneficiary at 
December 31, 2024
($)
Drake Mills
2/7/2001
193,940
Drake Mills
5/1/2008
1,341,075
Drake Mills
2/27/2020(1)
1,500,000
M. Lance Hall
7/23/2002
386,693
M. Lance Hall
10/29/2019
318,936
(1)	
On February 27, 2020, the Bank entered into an Amended and Restated Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement that replaced 
the Endorsement Method Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated October 29, 2019. The February 27, 2020, restatement was executed 
to correct the death benefit to a $1,500,000 payment as approved by the Board in 2019.
Mr. Mills has (i) an Amended and Restated Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan 
Agreement, effective February 7, 2001, with the Bank (the “2001 Agreement”), and (ii) an Amended and 
Restated Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, effective May 1, 2008, with 
the Bank. Under both agreements, Origin Bank has agreed to pay the premiums under life insurance 
policies issued with respect to Mr. Mills, and his designated beneficiaries will be entitled to 65% of 
the net-at-risk insurance portion of the proceeds upon his death. Under the 2001 Agreement, upon a 
Change of Control, if Mr. Mills is subsequently terminated without Cause, his designated beneficiaries 
will be entitled to the benefits under the 2001 Agreement as if he had died while employed by the 
Bank. On February 27, 2020, the Bank entered into an Amended and Restated Endorsement Split 
Dollar Life Insurance Agreement with Mr. Mills (the “2020 Agreement”) that amended and restated 
the Endorsement Method Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated October 29, 2019. The 2020 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
74
Agreement provides, upon Mr. Mills’ death, Mr. Mills’ beneficiary will be entitled to insurance proceeds 
of $1,500,000 unless (i) Mr. Mills is terminated for Cause or (ii) Mr. Mills is subject to a final removal or 
prohibition order issued by an appropriate federal banking agency of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Act. The Bank owns the policy and will be the beneficiary of any remaining death proceeds after 
Mr. Mills’ interest is determined. No benefit will be paid under the 2020 Agreement if (i) Mr. Mills 
commits suicide or (ii) if the insurance company denies coverage in certain instances.
Mr. Hall has a Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, effective July 23, 2002, 
as amended, with the Bank. Under the agreement, the Bank has agreed to pay the premiums under 
a life insurance policy issued with respect to Mr. Hall and Mr. Hall’s designated beneficiaries will be 
entitled to a certain portion of the insurance proceeds upon his death. In the event of Mr. Hall’s death 
or disability during employment with the Bank, his designated beneficiaries will be entitled to 80% of 
net-at-risk insurance portion of proceeds. Upon a CIC, if Mr. Hall is subsequently terminated without 
Cause, his designated beneficiaries will be entitled to the benefits under the agreement as if he had 
died while employed by the Bank.
On October 29, 2019, the Company entered into a second Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance 
Agreement with Mr. Hall that provides additional key man coverage for the Company and a life 
insurance benefit to Mr. Hall’s designated beneficiary. Under this agreement, in the event of the death 
of Mr. Hall while being employed by the Bank, his designated beneficiaries will be entitled to receive 
the lesser of (i) the present value of the benefits Mr. Hall would have received under his ESIA or 
(ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the total death proceeds of the individual insurance policy or policies 
adopted by the Bank for purposes of insuring Mr. Hall’s life minus the greater of (x) the cash surrender 
value or (y) the aggregate premiums paid by the Bank. Mr. Hall’s beneficiaries will not be entitled 
to any payments under the Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement if his employment 
is voluntarily or involuntarily terminated or if he were subject to a final removal or prohibition order 
issued by a federal banking agency or his beneficiaries are denied coverage under the terms of the life 
insurance policies.
Employment Arrangements, CIC Agreements, and Potential Payments 
Upon Termination or CIC 
Below are summaries of certain arrangements between the NEOs, the Company and/or Origin Bank. 
These summaries do not include all of the provisions of the employment or CIC agreements with each 
NEO, and this section is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full employment or CIC agreements 
which can be accessed through links in the exhibit index to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal 
year ended December 31, 2024. The terms “Cause,” “Good Reason,” and “CIC,” are defined in the 
respective employment agreements with each NEO.
DRAKE MILLS
On February 27, 2020, the Company entered into a restated employment agreement with Drake Mills. 
The agreement provides for three-year terms that renew automatically for successive three-year terms 
unless either party provides at least 180 days’ notice of non-renewal.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Mills is entitled to a base salary of $835,800, which the Board 
can adjust, and an annual bonus, the criteria of which is determined by the Board.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 75
In addition to a base salary and bonus, Mr. Mills is eligible to participate in the Company’s employee 
benefit plans in a comparable manner as other executives, to use a Company car and to receive 
reimbursement or payment of professional development dues, professional organization membership 
costs, country-club dues, and business-related travel expenses.
Mr. Mills’ employment agreement includes indefinite obligations of confidentiality and non-
disparagement, and a prohibition, subject to certain geographic limitations, on soliciting Company 
customers or employees for two years after termination of his employment.
Under the restated employment agreement, upon termination of employment for any reason other 
than Cause, Mr. Mills will be paid a prorated bonus based on his actual performance for the year.
If Mr. Mills’ employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Mills for Good Reason, 
and such termination does not occur within 24 months following a CIC, then, subject to Mr. Mills entry 
into a valid release of claims in favor of the Company, Mr. Mills will be entitled to receive two times the 
sum of (i) his then-current base salary, and (ii) the average STIP bonus paid during the last three years 
immediately preceding termination, to be paid in equal monthly installments over the 24 months following 
termination. The Company will also pay the cost of Mr. Mills’ premiums for continued participation in 
the Company medical hospitalization insurance program under COBRA for up to 24 months following 
termination, or, if doing so would cause the plans to provide discriminatory benefits, the Company will 
make monthly cash payments to Mr. Mills in an amount equal to the premium payments.
If Mr. Mills’ employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Mills for Good Reason, 
and such termination occurs within 24 months following a CIC, then, subject to a valid release of claims 
in favor of the Company, Mr. Mills will be entitled to the sum of (i) three times his then-current base 
salary, and (ii) three times the average STIP bonus paid to him in the three calendar years immediately 
preceding the CIC, with such total amount reduced pro-rata for each full month that has elapsed 
between the CIC and the termination. The amount will be paid in a lump sum within sixty days of 
termination subject to certain exceptions. The Company will also pay the cost of COBRA premium-
payments for a maximum of 18 months.
WILLIAM WALLACE, IV
Mr. Wallace entered into a CIC Agreement with the Company and the Bank on July 27, 2022, effective 
August 8, 2022. The CIC Agreement has an initial term of three years and automatically renews for 
successive one-year terms unless notice is given 90 days prior to the end of a term. If Mr. Wallace is 
terminated in the two years after a CIC or the earlier of (i) the date negotiations commence leading to 
the consummation of a CIC and (ii) six months prior to the effective date of a CIC other than for Cause 
or for Good Reason, then Mr. Wallace will be entitled to severance benefits. Those severance benefits 
will consist of (i) a lump sum cash payment of two times Mr. Wallace’s then-current base salary, and 
(ii) a lump sum cash payment of two times the average STIP bonus paid to him within the three calendar 
years (or such fewer years as he has been employed by us) immediately preceding his termination. The 
CIC benefits will be paid no later than the 60th day following the later of (i) the termination of service 
and (ii) the Closing Date. Under the terms of the CIC Agreement, Mr. Wallace may not, for a period of 
one year following a CIC, solicit any of our customers in the year prior to termination in certain parishes 
and counties in which we are doing business and he may not recruit or hire any person who was an 
employee in the six-month period prior to termination.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
76
M. LANCE HALL
On February 27, 2020, the Company entered into a restated employment agreement with M. Lance 
Hall for three-year terms that renew automatically for successive three-year terms unless either party 
provides at least 180 days’ notice of non-renewal.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Hall is entitled to a base salary of not less than $500,000, which 
the Board can adjust, and an annual bonus the criteria of which is determined by the Board. Mr. Hall’s 
current base salary is $600,000.
Mr. Hall is also eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans in a comparable manner 
as other executives, to use a Company car and to receive reimbursement or payment of professional 
development dues, professional organization membership costs, country-club dues, and business-
related travel expenses.
Under the terms of the restated employment agreement, Mr. Hall is subject to indefinite obligations 
of confidentiality and non-disparagement, and is prohibited, subject to certain geographic limitations, 
from soliciting Company customers or employees for two years after termination of employment.
Upon termination of employment for any reason other than Cause, Mr. Hall will be paid a prorated 
bonus based on his actual performance for the year.
If Mr. Hall’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Hall for Good Reason, 
and such termination does not occur within 24 months following a CIC, then, subject to Mr. Hall’s 
entry into a valid release of claims in favor of the Company, Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive two 
times the sum of (i) his then-current base salary, and (ii) the average STIP bonus he received in the 
three calendar years immediately preceding termination, to be paid in equal monthly installments over 
the 24 months following termination. The Company will also pay the cost of Mr. Hall’s premiums for 
continued participation in the Company medical hospitalization insurance program under COBRA for 
up to 24 months following termination, or, if doing so would cause the plans to provide discriminatory 
benefits, the Company will make monthly cash payments to Mr. Hall in an amount equal to the premium 
payments.
If Mr. Hall’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Hall for Good Reason, 
and such termination occurs within 24 months following a CIC, then, subject to a valid release of claims 
in favor of the Company, Mr. Hall will be entitled to the sum of (i) three times his then-current base 
salary, and (ii) three times the average STIP bonus paid to him in the three calendar years immediately 
preceding the CIC, with such total amount reduced pro-rata for each full month that has elapsed 
between the CIC and the termination. The amount will be paid in a lump sum within sixty days of 
termination subject to certain limited exceptions. The Company will also pay the cost of COBRA 
premium-payments for a maximum of 18 months.
DEREK MCGEE
Mr. McGee entered into a CIC Agreement with the Bank on February 22, 2022. The CIC Agreement has 
an initial term of three years and automatically renews for successive one-year terms unless notice is 
given 90 days prior to the end of a term. If Mr. McGee is terminated in the two years after a CIC or the 
earlier of (i) the date negotiations commence leading to the consummation of a CIC and (ii) six months 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 77
prior to the effective date of a CIC other than for Cause or for Good Reason, then Mr. McGee will be 
entitled to severance benefits. Those severance benefits will consist of (i) a lump sum cash payment 
of two times Mr. McGee’s then-current base salary, and (ii) a lump sum cash payment of two times the 
average STIP bonus paid to him within the three calendar years (or such fewer years as he has been 
employed by us) immediately preceding his termination. The CIC benefits will be paid no later than 
the sixtieth day following the later of (i) the termination of service and (ii) the Closing Date. Under the 
terms of the CIC Agreement, Mr. McGee may not, for a period of one year following a CIC, solicit any 
of our customers in the year prior to termination in certain parishes and counties in which we are doing 
business and he may not recruit or hire any person who was an employee in the six-month period prior 
to termination.
PRESTON MOORE
Mr. Moore entered into a CIC agreement with the Company effective March 28, 2018. Following an 
initial term that ended on March 27, 2021, this agreement automatically renews for successive one-year 
terms unless notice is given 90 days prior to the end of a term. If Mr. Moore is terminated in the two 
years after a CIC or the earlier of (i) the date negotiations commence leading to the consummation of 
a CIC and (ii) six months prior to the effective date of a CIC other than for Cause or for Good Reason, 
then Mr. Moore will be entitled to severance benefits. Those severance benefits will consist of (i) a lump 
sum cash payment of two times Mr. Moore’s then-current base salary, (ii) a lump sum cash payment of 
two times the average STIP bonus paid to him within the three calendar years immediately preceding 
his termination, and (iii) any equity-type award under any plan or arrangement becoming fully vested 
and exercisable. The CIC benefits will be paid no later than the thirtieth day following the later of 
(i) the termination of service and (ii) effective date of a CIC. Under the terms of the CIC Agreement, 
Mr. Moore may not, for a period of nine months following a CIC, solicit any of our customers in the year 
prior to termination in certain parishes and counties in which we are doing business and he may not 
recruit or hire any person who was an employee in the six-month period prior to termination.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or CIC
The table below shows the estimated amounts that could have been paid to each NEO in 2024 under 
his respective agreement (or agreements) and any applicable benefit plans in the event each NEO 
was terminated in certain instances. The following information is based on the executive’s base salary 
compensation at December 31, 2024, and 2024 bonuses which were paid in early 2025, and assumes 
the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2024. Capitalized terms used in this section have the 
meanings ascribed to them in the respective executive’s agreements. 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
78
Drake Mills
Termination 
by 
Company 
for Cause
($)
Termination 
Without 
Cause/
Resignation 
for Good 
Reason
($)
Resignation 
without 
Good 
Reason
($)
Death
($)
Disability
($)
CIC
($)
Retirement
($)
Employment Agreement
—
2,738,615(1)
—
637,883(2)
637,883(2)
4,107,922(3)
637,883(2)
Benefits Payable under SERP
—
3,813,729(4)
3,813,729(4)
3,813,729(4) 3,813,729(4)
6,105,573(5)
6,105,573(5)
Split Dollar Life Insurance 
02/07/2001(6)
—
—
—
193,940
—
—
—
Split Dollar Life Insurance 
05/01/2008(7)
—
—
—
1,341,075
—
—
—
Split Dollar Life Insurance 
10/29/2019(8)
—
—
—
1,500,000
—
—
—
Company Paid Life Insurance(9)
—
—
—
500,000
—
—
—
Continuing Medical 
Coverage(10)
—
17,780
—
—
—
13,335
—
RSU/PSU Accelerated 
Vesting(11)
—
4,758,638(12)
—
5,432,860
5,432,860
5,829,412
5,432,860
Accrued PTO(13)
93,192
93,192
—
93,192
93,192
93,192
93,192
Totals 
93,192
11,421,954
3,813,729
13,512,679
9,977,664
16,149,434
12,269,508
(1)	
Upon termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason that does not occur within 24 months following a CIC (such 24-month 
period referred to in these footnotes as the (“CIC Protection Period”), Mr. Mills will be paid two times the sum of (i) his then current base 
salary and, (ii) the average STIP bonus compensation paid during the last three years preceding his date of termination. 
(2)	
Upon termination of employment for death, disability or retirement, Mr. Mills will be paid a prorated STIP bonus based on his actual 
performance for the year. For the purpose of this calculation, the value reported is the full year STIP bonus amount paid to Mr. Mills for 2024.
(3)	
Upon termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason within the CIC Protection Period, Mr. Mills will be paid the sum of 
(i) three times his then current base salary, and (ii) three times the average STIP bonus paid during the last three years preceding his date of 
termination. 
(4)	
Amounts are equal to the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance at December 31, 2024. Under Mr. Mills’ SERP, upon termination without Cause 
or voluntary termination, he would receive the balance of his Accrued Liability Retirement Balance paid out in three annual installments of 
$1,271,243. Upon Mr. Mills’ death, his beneficiaries would receive a lump sum payment equal to the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance 
within 60 days of death. Upon disability, he would receive a lump sum payment of the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance within 30 days 
following disability.
(5)	
Upon a Separation from Service after the age of 65 or a CIC, Mr. Mills will receive $264,040 in annual installments beginning on the first day of 
the month following Mr. Mills’ Separation from Service following the age of 65 until death. This amount is calculated using projected death at 
age 85 with an annual 1.5% COLA increase.
(6)	
Split dollar life insurance dated February 7, 2001, provides for a $193,940 death benefit at December 31, 2024, equal to 65% of the net-at-
risk insurance portion of the proceeds. The net-at-risk insurance portion is the total proceeds less the cash value of the policy. This benefit is 
retained under each circumstance listed in the table above except for termination for Cause.
(7)	
Split dollar life insurance dated May 1, 2008, provides for a $1,341,075 death benefit payment to Mr. Mills’ beneficiaries. This is the amount 
equal to 65% of the net-at-risk insurance portion of the proceeds. The net-at-risk insurance portion is the total proceeds less the cash value of 
the policy. This benefit is retained under each circumstance listed in the table above except for termination for Cause.
(8)	
On February 27, 2020, the Bank entered into the 2020 Agreement that amended and restated the Endorsement Method Split Dollar Life 
Insurance Agreement, dated October 29, 2019. Prior to the amendment and restatement, the agreement provided for a formulaic death 
benefit. The 2020 agreement provided for a $1,500,000 death benefit payment as approved by the Board in 2019. This benefit is retained 
under each circumstance listed in the table above except for termination for Cause.
(9)	
Origin provides a life insurance benefit to eligible employees of two times the employee’s current salary up to a maximum of $500,000. The 
benefit will be reduced to $325,000 at age 65.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 79
(10)	
Mr. Mills’ employment agreement provides that If Mr. Mills is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, he will be entitled 
to continuation of Employer’s current medical hospitalization insurance program and the Company will pay up to two years of all COBRA 
premiums or cash equivalent. The agreement also provides for payment of COBRA premiums for a period of up to 18 months in the case of 
termination without Cause or for Good Reason following a CIC.
(11)	
Accelerated vesting (“Acceleration Percentage”) is provided on outstanding RSUs at 100% in the event of death, disability, CIC (assuming that 
the awards are not substituted or equitably converted in the transaction), or qualified retirement. For PSUs, except for the PSU component 
of the CEO One-Time award, the Acceleration Percentage is measured by the percentage of time elapsed from the commencement of the 
performance period to the death, disability, termination without cause, or retirement, to the total number of days in the performance period. If 
the Company undergoes a CIC and the surviving corporation does not assume the outstanding PSUs, or substitute equivalent equity awards, 
or if the surviving corporation assumes the outstanding PSUs and the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause within twelve months 
following the CIC, then the PSUs will become immediately vested on the date of the CIC or the date of termination of employment without 
cause, as applicable, with respect to 100% of the target number of performance units. The value was determined by multiplying the number 
of PSUs granted, times the applicable Acceleration Percentage, times the share price of $33.29 at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, 
the actual average payout percentages were 63.9%, zero and 131.7% for PSUs granted on February 18, 2022, February 17, 2023, and May 20, 
2024. In the case of a qualified termination, death or disability, the CEO One-Time PSUs, are eligible to vest based on achievement of the 
stock price hurdles during the performance period. At December 31, 2024, the stock price hurdles have not yet been met and therefore the 
PSU component of the CEO One-Time Award granted on December 13, 2022, is measured at 0% achievement.
(12)	
Accelerated vesting is provided in the event of termination other than termination for cause on Mr. Mills’ One-Time RSUs granted on 
December 13, 2022.
(13)	
Company policy provides that, upon termination, all employees are paid for any accrued but unused paid time off (“PTO”). The PTO amount 
above is based on 2024 accrued and unused PTO hours at December 31, 2024, times Mr. Mills’ hourly rate.
William Wallace, IV
Termination 
by Company 
for Cause 
($)
Termination 
Other Than 
Termination 
for Cause 
($)
Death
($)
Disability 
($)
CIC 
($)
Retirement
($)
CIC Agreement(1)
—
—
—
—
1,263,969
—
Company Paid Life Insurance(2)
—
—
500,000
—
—
—
STIP(3)
—
—
200,450
200,450
—
200,450
RSU/PSU Accelerated Vesting(4)
—
85,047
456,330
456,330
546,822
456,330
Accrued PTO(5)
49,327
49,327
49,327
49,327
49,327
49,327
Totals
49,327
134,374
1,206,107
706,107
1,860,118
706,107
(1)	
Mr. Wallace’s CIC Agreement provides that if he is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason within two years following a CIC, 
Mr. Wallace would be paid two times the sum of (i) his then current base salary and (ii) the average STIP bonus paid to him in the last three 
years preceding his date of termination.
(2)	
Origin provides a life insurance benefit to eligible employees of two times the employee’s current salary up to a maximum of $500,000.
(3)	
Upon termination of employment for death, disability or retirement, Mr. Wallace will be paid a prorated STIP bonus based on his actual 
performance for the year. For the purpose of this calculation, the value reported is the full year STIP bonus amount paid to Mr. Wallace for 
2024.
(4)	
Accelerated vesting (“Acceleration Percentage”) is provided on outstanding RSUs at 100% in the event of death, disability, CIC (assuming that 
the awards are not substituted or equitably converted in the transaction), or qualified retirement. For PSUs, the Acceleration Percentage is 
measured by the percentage of time elapsed from the commencement of the performance period to the death, disability, termination without 
cause, or retirement, to the total number of days in the performance period. If the Company undergoes a CIC and the surviving corporation 
does not assume the outstanding PSUs, or substitute equivalent equity awards, or if the surviving corporation assumes the outstanding PSUs 
and the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause within twelve months following the CIC, then the PSUs will become immediately 
vested on the date of the CIC or the date of termination of employment without cause, as applicable, with respect to 100% of the target 
number of performance units. The value was determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares at December 31, 2024, times the 
applicable Acceleration Percentage times the share price of $33.29 at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the actual average payout 
percentages were 63.9%, zero and 131.7% for PSUs granted on February 18, 2022, February 17, 2023, and May 20, 2024.
(5)	
Company policy provides that, upon termination, all employees are paid for any accrued but unused PTO. The PTO amount above is based 
on 2024 accrued and unused PTO hours at December 31, 2024, times the executive’s hourly rate.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
80
M. Lance Hall
Termination 
by 
Company 
for Cause 
($)
Termination 
Without 
Cause/
Resignation 
for Good 
Reason
($)
Resignation 
without 
Good 
Reason
($)
Death 
($)
Disability
($)
CIC
($)
Retirement
($)
Employment Agreement
—
1,841,053(1)
—
315,525(2)
315,525(2) 2,761,579(3)
315,525(2)
Benefits Payable under SERP 
01/01/2004
—
623,001(4)
623,001(4)
623,001(5)
—
2,910,499(6) 2,910,499(6)
Benefits Payable under ESIA 
10/29/2019
—
86,439(7)
—
—
86,439(7)
211,315(8)
360,000(9)
Split Dollar Life Insurance 
07/23/2002(10)
—
—
—
386,693
—
—
—
Split Dollar Life Insurance 
10/29/2019(11)
—
—
—
318,936
—
—
—
Company Paid Life Insurance(12)
—
—
—
500,000
—
—
—
Continuing Medical Coverage(13)
—
51,561
—
—
—
38,671
—
RSU/PSU Accelerated Vesting(14)
—
227,242
—
493,429
493,429
636,305
493,429
Accrued PTO(15)
76,131
76,131
—
76,131
76,131
76,131
76,131
Totals
76,131
2,905,427
623,001
2,713,715
971,524
6,634,500
4,155,584
(1)	
Upon termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason outside of a CIC Protection Period, Mr. Hall will be paid two times the 
sum of (i) his then current base salary, and (ii) the average STIP bonus paid during the last three years preceding his date of termination. 
(2)	
Upon termination of employment for death, disability or retirement, Mr. Hall will be paid a prorated STIP bonus based on his actual 
performance for the year. For the purpose of this calculation, the value reported is the full year STIP bonus amount paid to Mr. Hall for 2024.
(3)	
Upon termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason within a CIC Protection Period, Mr. Hall will be paid the sum of 
(i) three times his then current base salary, and (ii) three times the average STIP bonus paid during the last three years preceding his date 
of termination. 
(4)	
Amounts are equal to the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance at December 31, 2024, for Mr. Hall. If Mr. Hall is terminated without Cause 
or resigns prior to the age of 65, Mr. Hall will receive, as severance compensation over 15 annual installments starting on the date he turns 
65, an amount equal to the accrued balance with interest, on the date of his termination, of Mr. Hall’s liability reserve account. The number 
reported for the payment upon termination without Cause excludes interest that would be payable when payments begin being made 
when Mr. Hall turns 65.
(5)	
This value represents the value of the death benefit at December 31, 2024, payable to Mr. Hall’s beneficiary in a lump sum on the 1st day 
of the month after death.
(6)	
Mr. Hall’s SERP will pay, upon Mr. Hall’s retirement at age 65, an annual benefit of $118,939 that includes an annual 1.5% COLA increase, 
paid in equal installments until Mr. Hall’s death. Upon a CIC, if Mr. Hall is terminated, except for Cause, he will receive the annual benefit 
as if he had retired at the age of 65. The projected total retirement benefit of $2,910,499 assumes death at age 86 based on the MP-2015 
Mortality table.
(7)	
Represents 100% of the Accrued Liability Retirement Balance as of the effective date of the termination or disability of Mr. Hall, which we 
assumed to be December 31, 2024.
(8)	
Represents the present value of the benefits provided under the ESIA at December 31, 2024, in the event that Mr. Hall is involuntarily 
separated from service following a CIC, other than for Cause, using a 5.0% discount rate.
(9)	
Mr. Hall has an ESIA, effective October 29, 2019, that provides for, beginning at the age of 60 and irrespective of whether Mr. Hall retires, 
an annual amount equal to ten percent of Mr. Hall’s annualized base salary for the calendar year in which Mr. Hall attains the age of 60. The 
annual payments will begin within thirty days following Mr. Hall turning 60 and continue annually for six years. For purposes of estimating 
the payment amount, we assumed that Mr. Hall retired and turned 60 on December 31, 2024.
(10)	
Represents 80% of the net-at-risk insurance portion of the proceeds at December 31, 2024. The net-at-risk insurance portion is the total 
proceeds less the cash value of the policy, which will be paid in a lump sum upon Mr. Hall’s death. 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 81
(11)	
Under the 2019 Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, in the event of the death of Mr. Hall while being employed by the 
Bank, his designated beneficiaries will be entitled to receive the lesser of (i) the present value of the benefit Mr. Hall would have received 
under his ESIA or (ii) the proceeds from his life insurance policy, excluding the greater of the cash surrender value or the aggregate 
premiums paid by the Bank. The Present Value is the lesser amount and was calculated using a 5.0% discount rate and a benefit based on 
his current salary at December 31, 2024.
(12)	
All eligible company employees are provided with a life insurance benefit of two times their annual salary up to a maximum of $500,000.
(13)	
Mr. Hall’s employment agreement provides he receive or have paid on his behalf for a period of up to 18 months following his termination 
without Cause or resignation for Good Reason in the CIC Protection Period, all COBRA premiums for continuation of Employer’s current 
medical hospitalization insurance program. If Mr. Hall is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason outside of the CIC Protection 
Period, he will be entitled to two years of COBRA premiums until he secures alternative health benefits from a new employer or COBRA 
coverage terminates.
(14)	
Accelerated vesting (“Acceleration Percentage”) is provided on outstanding RSUs at 100% in the event of death, disability, CIC (assuming 
that the awards are not substituted or equitably converted in the transaction), or qualified retirement. For PSUs, the Acceleration Percentage 
is measured by the percentage of time elapsed from the commencement of the performance period to the death, disability, termination 
without cause, or retirement, to the total number of days in the performance period. If the Company undergoes a CIC and the surviving 
corporation does not assume the outstanding PSUs, or substitute equivalent equity awards, or if the surviving corporation assumes the 
outstanding PSUs and the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause within twelve months following the CIC, then the PSUs will 
become immediately vested on the date of the CIC or the date of termination of employment without cause, as applicable, with respect to 
100% of the target number of performance units. The value was determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares at December 31, 
2024, times the applicable Acceleration Percentage times the share price of $33.29 at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the actual 
average payout percentages were 63.9%, zero and 131.7% for PSUs granted on February 18, 2022, February 17, 2023, and May 20, 2024.
(15)	
Company policy provides that, upon termination, all employees are paid for any accrued but unused PTO. The PTO amount above is 
based on 2024 accrued and unused PTO hours at December 31, 2024, times Mr. Hall’s hourly rate.
Termination 
by Company 
for Cause
($)
Termination 
Other Than 
Termination 
for Cause
($)
Death
($)
Disability
($)
CIC
($)
Retirement
($)
Derek McGee
CIC Agreement(1)
—
—
—
—
1,461,973
—
Company Paid Life Insurance(2)
—
—
500,000
—
—
—
STIP(3)
—
—
252,938
252,938
—
252,938
RSU/PSU Accelerated Vesting(4)
—
189,930
627,095
627,095
740,203
627,095
Accrued PTO(5)
41,106
41,106
41,106
41,106
41,106
41,106
Totals
41,106
231,036
1,421,139
921,139
2,243,282
921,139
(1)	
Mr. McGee’s CIC Agreement provides that if he is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason within two years following a CIC, 
Mr. McGee would be paid (i) two times the sum of his then current base salary, and (ii) a lump sum of two times the average STIP bonus 
paid to him in the last three years preceding his date of termination.
(2)	
Origin provides a life insurance benefit to eligible employees of two times the employee’s current salary up to a maximum of $500,000.
(3)	
Upon termination of employment for death, disability or retirement, Mr. McGee will be paid a prorated STIP bonus based on his actual 
performance for the year. For the purpose of this calculation, the value reported is the full year STIP bonus amount paid to Mr. McGee for 
December 31, 2024.
(4)	
Accelerated vesting (“Acceleration Percentage”) is provided on outstanding RSUs at 100% in the event of death, disability, CIC (assuming that 
the awards are not substituted or equitably converted in the transaction), or qualified retirement. For PSUs, the Acceleration Percentage is 
measured by the percentage of time elapsed from the commencement of the performance period to the death, disability, termination without 
cause, or retirement, to the total number of days in the performance period. If the Company undergoes a CIC and the surviving corporation 
does not assume the outstanding PSUs, or substitute equivalent equity awards, or if the surviving corporation assumes the outstanding PSUs 
and the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause within twelve months following the CIC, then the PSUs will become immediately 
vested on the date of the CIC or the date of termination of employment without cause, as applicable, with respect to 100% of the target 
number of performance units. The value was determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares at December 31, 2024, times the 
applicable Acceleration Percentage times the share price of $33.29 at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the actual average payout 
percentages were 63.9%, zero and 131.7% for PSUs granted on February 18, 2022, February 17, 2023, and May 20, 2024.
(5)	
Company policy provides that, upon termination, all employees are paid for any accrued but unused PTO. The PTO amount above is 
based on 2024 accrued and unused PTO hours at December 31, 2024, times the executive’s hourly rate.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
82
Termination 
by Company 
for Cause
($)
Termination 
Other Than 
Termination 
for Cause
($)
Death
($)
Disability
($)
CIC
($)
Retirement
($)
Preston Moore
CIC Agreement(1)
—
—
—
—
1,333,485
—
Company Paid Life Insurance(2)
—
—
500,000
—
—
—
STIP(3)
190,000
190,000
—
190,000
RSU/PSU Accelerated Vesting(4)
—
143,571
312,051
312,051
402,543
312,051
Accrued PTO(5)
67,614
67,614
67,614
67,614
67,614
67,614
Totals
67,614
211,185
1,069,665
569,665
1,803,642
569,665
(1)	
Mr. Moore’s CIC Agreement provides that if he is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason within two years following a CIC, 
Mr. Moore would be paid two times the sum of (i) his then current base salary, and (ii) the average STIP bonus paid to him in the last three 
years preceding his date of termination.
(2)	
Origin provides a life insurance benefit to eligible employees of two times the employee’s current salary up to a maximum of $500,000. The 
benefit will be reduced to $325,000 at age 65.
(3)	
Upon termination of employment for death, disability or retirement, Mr. Moore will be paid a prorated STIP bonus based on his actual 
performance for the year. For the purpose of this calculation, the value reported is the full year STIP bonus amount paid to Mr. Moore for 
December 31, 2024.
(4)	
Accelerated vesting (“Acceleration Percentage”) is provided on outstanding RSUs at 100% in the event of death, disability, CIC (assuming 
that the awards are not substituted or equitably converted in the transaction), or qualified retirement. For PSUs, the Acceleration Percentage 
is measured by the percentage of time elapsed from grant date to the death, disability, termination without cause, or retirement, to 
the total number of days in the performance period. If the Company undergoes a CIC and the surviving corporation does not assume 
the outstanding PSUs, or substitute equivalent equity awards, or if the surviving corporation assumes the outstanding PSUs and the 
grantee’s employment is terminated without cause within twelve months following the CIC, then the PSUs will become immediately 
vested on the date of the CIC or the date of termination of employment without cause, as applicable, with respect to 100% of the target 
number of performance units. The value was determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares at December 31, 2024, times the 
applicable Acceleration Percentage times the share price of $33.29 at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, the actual average 
payout percentages were 63.9%, zero and 131.7% for PSUs granted on February 18, 2022, February 17, 2023, and May 20, 2024.
(5)	
Company policy provides that, upon termination, all employees are paid for any accrued but unused PTO. The PTO amount above is 
based on 2024 accrued and unused PTO hours at December 31, 2024, times the executive’s hourly rate.
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 
and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following disclosure of the ratio of the annual 
total compensation of our PEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee, other than 
our PEO. 
Median employee total annual compensation (other than the PEO)
$        73,015
Total annual compensation of Drake Mills, our PEO
2,544,663
Ratio of PEO to median employee compensation
35:1
The pay ratio above represents the Company’s reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent 
with SEC rules based on our internal records and the methodology described below. Applicable rules 
and guidance provide flexibility in how companies identify the median employee, and other companies 
may use different methodologies or make different assumptions.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 83
We took the following steps to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees 
and to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and PEO:
•	 The median employee was identified for 2024 based on the employee population of 1,037 on 
December 31, 2024, which consisted of all full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal employees 
employed on that date.
•	 To find the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our PEO), we 
used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 
the fiscal year 2024. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and 
part-time permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2024, but who did not work 
for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time employees.
•	 We identified our 2024 median employee using this compensation measure and methodology, 
which was consistently applied to all employees who were included in the calculation. In order to 
determine the median employee, we then reviewed the employee list based upon a ranking of the 
total cash compensation of all employees other than our PEO.
•	 We calculated the median employee’s total annual compensation figure by aggregating the value 
of all wages, cash incentives, equity incentives, Employee 401(k) employer contributions and any 
applicable perquisites earned or paid in 2024 in the same manner as we calculated the total annual 
compensation of our PEO for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table.
•	 With respect to the annual total compensation of our PEO, we used the amount reported in the 
“Total” column of our 2024 Summary Compensation Table. 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
84
Pay Versus Performance (“PVP”)
As determined under the SEC rules, and provided in the table below, the Company must describe the 
relationship between the “compensation actually paid” to our CEO, who is our principal executive 
officer, as well as the average compensation actually paid to our non-CEO NEOs, and the following 
key financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020, including:
•	 Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”);
•	 Peer group market capitalization weighted TSR;
•	 Company net income; and
•	 A Company-selected performance measure that is the most important measure used to link 
“compensation actually paid” to our CEO and NEOs for 2024, which we determined to be ROAA.
Compensation Actually Paid, as determined under SEC requirements, does not reflect the actual 
amount of compensation earned by or paid to our executive officers during a covered year.
The following were the most important financial performance measures, as determined by the Company, 
that link Compensation Actually Paid with the Company’s performance in the most recently completed 
fiscal year:
Value of Initial Fixed 
$100 Investment(3) 
based on:
Year
Summary 
Compensation 
Table (“SCT”) 
Total for CEO
$
Compensation 
Actually Paid 
to CEO(1)
$
Average 
SCT Total 
Compensation 
for Non-CEO 
NEOs 
$
Average 
Compensation 
Actually Paid 
to Non-CEO 
NEOs(2)
$
TSR
For OBK 
$
TSR
For Peer 
Group
$
Net 
Income 
$
ROAA 
%
2024
2,544,663
2,210,474
1,005,488
1,066,999
95.23
125.60
76,492,000
0.77
2023
1,722,491
1,107,614
976,775
799,804
99.86
108.99
83,800,000
0.84
2022
10,218,272
10,110,197
1,168,452
1,084,150
101.09
111.12
87,715,000
1.01
2021
2,079,384
5,251,965
780,066
850,215
116.60
121.03
108,546,000
1.45
2020
1,563,690
(167,745)
695,203
674,913
74.53
89.64
36,357,000
0.56
(1)	
Drake Mills served as CEO & President of Origin Bancorp, Inc. for each of the years presented in the table.
(2)	
The NEOs for each of the years presented in the table were as follows: for 2024 and 2023, William Wallace, IV, M. Lance Hall, Derek McGee 
and Preston Moore; for 2022, William Wallace, IV, M. Lance Hall, Stephen Brolly, Derek McGee and Preston Moore; for 2021, Stephen Brolly, 
M. Lance Hall, Jim Crotwell and Preston Moore; for 2020, Stephen Brolly, M. Lance Hall, Cary Davis and Preston Moore;
(3)	
Cumulative TSR assumes an initial investment of $100 at the market close on December 31, 2019, in OBK common stock and in the 
common stock of companies within our peer group. TSR for OBK stock was (25.47)% in 2020, 56.45% in 2021, (13.30)% in 2022, (1.22)% 
in 2023, and (4.64)% in 2024, for a cumulative five-year TSR of (4.77)%. A $100 investment in OBK stock on December 31, 2019, would be 
valued at $95.23 at December 31, 2024, which underperformed our peers as measured by the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank, the 
peer group used for this purpose.
For each of the years presented in the PVP table, Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Mills was 
calculated in accordance with SEC regulations. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount 
of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Mills during the applicable year. To calculate Compensation 
Actually Paid for Mr. Mills, the following amounts were deducted from or added to the SCT total 
compensation:

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 85
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Total Compensation in SCT
$ 2,544,663
$ 1,722,491
$ 10,218,272
$ 2,079,384
$ 1,563,690
Minus: change in the actuarial present 
values reported under column “Change in 
Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred 
Compensation Earnings” of SCT
(4,899)
—
(126,437)
(122,705)
(119,082)
Plus: service cost for pension plans
173,422
173,663
197,558
191,728
186,065
Minus: stock awards reported in SCT
(1,002,988)
(417,884)
(8,642,860)
(500,031)
—
Plus: fair value(1) at fiscal year-end of 
unvested stock awards granted during 
covered fiscal year
1,170,909
187,489
8,533,441
531,221
—
Plus/Minus: change in fair value(2) at 
fiscal year-end of unvested stock awards 
granted in any prior fiscal year
(646,624)
(526,929)
(85,469)
166,302
(165,803)
Plus/Minus: change in fair value at vesting 
date of stock awards granted in any prior 
fiscal year
(34,729)
(49,438)
4,175
101,912
(67,338)
Plus/Minus: change in fair value at fiscal 
year-end of unexercised stock options 
granted in any prior fiscal year(3)
—
—
—
—
(1,568,350)
Plus/Minus: change in fair value at 
exercising date of stock options granted in 
any prior fiscal year 
—
—
—
2,798,556
—
Plus: dividends paid on stock awards not 
included in total compensation
10,720
18,222
11,517
5,598
3,073
  Compensation Actually Paid
$ 2,210,474
$ 1,107,614
$ 10,110,197
$ 5,251,965
$   (167,745)
(1)	
We measure the fair value of the RSUs and RSAs at each fiscal year end by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on the 
last trading day of the year by the number of shares or units that have not vested. We measure the fair value of the PSUs awarded under 
the LTIP, which are subject to performance conditions as dictated by the award agreements, based on actual performance at fiscal year 
end. We measure the fair value of the 129,735 CEO One-Time PSU Award granted on December 13, 2022, using a Monte-Carlo Simulation 
valuation performed at fiscal year end.
(2)	
We remeasure the fair value of the RSUs and RSAs at each fiscal year end by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on 
the last trading day of the year by the number of shares or units that have not vested minus the prior fiscal year end fair value of identical 
awards. We remeasure the fair value of the PSUs awarded, but not yet vested, under the LTIP based on actual performance attained at 
each fiscal year end minus the fair value of identical awards at the prior fiscal year end. Please see the LTIP PSU table below for actual 
performance at each fiscal year end by grant date. We remeasured the fair value of the 129,735 CEO One-Time PSU Award granted on 
December 13, 2022, using a Monte-Carlo Simulation valuation performed at each fiscal year end. The assumptions used in calculating the 
fair value of the one time PSUs and the final fair value are shown below in the Monte-Carlo Simulation Valuation Inputs and Results table.
The table below shows the actual performance of the LTIP PSUs at each fiscal year end by grant date:
At December 31, 2024
At December 31, 2023
At December 31, 2022
Grant Date
ROAA
ROAE
ROAA
ROAE
ROAA
ROAE
LTIP PSUs - 02/18/2022 
57.13%
70.67%
—%
—%
—%
89.40%
LTIP PSUs - 02/17/2023 
—
—
—
—
N/A
N/A
LTIP PSUs - 05/20/2024 
127.90
135.43
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
86
Monte-Carlo Simulation Valuation Inputs and Results
Grant date
December 13, 2022
December 13, 2022
December 13, 2022
Valuation date
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
December 13, 2022
Expected term in years
5
6
7
Risk-free interest rate
4.38%
3.86%
3.50%
Expected volatility
39.55
36.82
33.00
Stock Price
$       33.29
$       35.57
$       36.87
Fair value per share
21.34
24.72
26.53
Shares outstanding
129,735
129,735
129,735
Total fair value
2,768,545
3,207,049
3,441,610
(3)	
The fair value of the stock options was determined using the Black-Scholes model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of 
the stock options were shown below:
Options Granted on January 1, 
2005
Options Granted on October 1, 
2011
December 31, 
2019
December 31, 
2020
December 31, 
2019
December 31, 
2020
Stock price
$37.84
$27.77
$37.84
$27.77
Exercise price
8.25
8.25
17.50
17.50
Number of periods to exercise in years
5
4
11
10
Compounded risk-free interest rate
1.68%
0.39%
1.86%
0.93%
Volatility
24.37
43.00
24.37
43.00
The average Compensation Actually Paid to the non-CEO NEOs for each of the years presented in the 
PVP table, was calculated in accordance with SEC regulations. The dollar amounts do not reflect the 
actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to non-CEO NEOs during the applicable year. To 
calculate average CAP for non-CEO NEOs, the following amounts were deducted from or added to 
the SCT total compensation:
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Total Compensation in SCT
$1,005,488
$976,775
$1,168,452
$780,066
$695,203
Minus: change in the actuarial present 
values reported under column “Change 
in Pension Value and Nonqualified 
Deferred Compensation Earnings” 
of SCT
—
—
(37,634)
(19,736)
(27,833)
Plus: service cost for pension plans
10,610
11,127
35,192
42,405
58,172
Minus: stock awards reported in SCT
(229,426)
(229,337)
(387,956)
(93,768)
—
Plus: fair value(1) at fiscal year-end of 
unvested stock awards granted during 
covered fiscal year
267,810
102,895
313,110
99,617
—
Plus/Minus: change in fair value(2) at 
fiscal year-end of unvested stock awards 
granted in any prior fiscal year
24,168
(59,002)
(8,589)
24,213
(23,914)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 87
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Plus/Minus: change in fair value at 
vesting date of stock awards granted in 
any prior fiscal year
(15,248)
(5,386)
413
16,603
(27,905)
Plus: dividends paid on stock awards not 
included in total compensation
3,597
2,732
1,162
815
1,190
  Compensation actually paid
$1,066,999
$799,804
$1,084,150
$850,215
$674,913
(1)	
We measure the fair value of the RSUs and RSAs at each fiscal year end by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on the 
last trading day of the year by the number of shares or units that have not vested. We measure the fair value of the PSUs awarded under the 
LTIP, which are subject to performance conditions as dictated by the award agreements, based on actual performance at fiscal year end.
(2)	
We remeasure the fair value of the RSUs and RSAs at each fiscal year end by multiplying the closing market price of our common stock on 
the last trading day of the year by the number of shares or units that have not vested minus the prior fiscal year end fair value of identical 
awards. We remeasure the fair value of the PSUs awarded, but not yet vested, under the LTIP based on actual performance attained at 
each fiscal year end minus the fair value of identical awards at the prior fiscal year end. Please see the LTIP PSU table above for the actual 
performance at each fiscal year end by grant date.
Description of Relationships
The graph below describes the relationship between compensation actually paid to our CEO and to 
our non-CEO NEOs (as calculated above) and our cumulative TSR for the indicated years. In addition, 
the graph compares our cumulative TSR and our peer group cumulative TSR for the indicated years. 
The Cumulative TSR assumes an initial investment of $100 at the market close on December 31, 
2019, in OBK common stock and in the common stock of companies within our peers as measured by 
the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank. TSR for OBK stock was (25.47)% in 2020, 56.45% in 2021, 
(13.30)% in 2022, (1.22)% in 2023, and (4.64)% in 2024, for a cumulative five-year TSR of (4.77)%. A 
$100 investment in OBK stock on December 31, 2019, would be valued at $95.23 at December 31, 
2024, which underperformed our peers as measured by the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank.
2021
2020
2022
2023
2024
CEO Pay ($M)
Non-CEO NEO Pay ($M)
TSR For OBK ($)
TSR For Peer Group ($)
12 (M)
8 (M)
4 (M)
0 (M)
150
100
50
0
-0.17 0.67
0.85
5.25
10.11
1.08
1.11 0.80
2.21
1.07
74.53
89.64
121.03
116.60
111.12
101.09
108.99
99.86
125.60
95.23
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the
 Non-CEO NEOs Vs. TSR (pay shown in millions)
 
 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
88
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment
based on:
Year
Compensation Actually 
Paid to CEO
$
Average Compensation 
Actually Paid to 
Non-CEO NEOs
$
TSR
For OBK 
$
TSR
For Peer Group
$
2024
2,210,474
1,066,999
95.23
125.60
2023
1,107,614
799,804
99.86
108.99
2022
10,110,197
1,084,150
101.09
111.12
2021
5,251,965
850,215
116.60
121.03
2020
(167,745)
674,913
74.53
89.64
The graph below describes the relationship between compensation actually paid to our CEO and to 
our Non-CEO NEOs (as calculated above) and our Net Income for the indicated years.
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the
 Non-CEO NEOs Vs. Net Income (in millions)
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
12 (M)
8 (M)
4 (M)
0 (M)
120
80
40
0
CEO Pay ($M)
Non-CEO NEO Pay ($M)
OBK Net Income ($M)
-0.17
0.67
5.25
0.85
10.11
1.08
1.11
0.80
2.21
1.07
36.36
108.55
87.72
83.80
76.49
Year
Compensation Actually 
Paid to CEO
$
Average Compensation 
Actually Paid to the 
Non-CEO NEOs
$
Net Income 
$
2024
2,210,474
1,066,999
76,492,000
2023
1,107,614
799,804
83,800,000
2022
10,110,197
1,084,150
87,715,000
2021
5,251,965
850,215
108,546,000
2020
(167,745)
674,913
36,357,000
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 89
The graph below describes the relationship between compensation actually paid to our CEO and to 
our non-CEO NEOs (as calculated above) and our ROAA for the indicated years.
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO and Average Compensation Actually Paid to the
 Non-CEO NEOs Vs. ROAA (pay shown in millions)
2020
2022
2021
2023
2024
12 (M)
8 (M)
4 (M)
0 (M)
3%
2%
1%
0%
CEO Pay ($M)
Other NEO Pay ($M)
OBK ROAA (%)
0.67
5.25
0.85
10.11
1.08
1.11
0.80
2.21
1.07
-0.17
0.56
1.45
1.01
0.84
0.77
Year
Compensation Actually 
Paid to CEO
$
Average Compensation 
Actually Paid to the 
Non-CEO NEOs
$
ROAA 
%
2024
2,210,474
1,066,999
0.77
2023
1,107,614
799,804
0.84
2022
10,110,197
1,084,150
1.01
2021
5,251,965
850,215
1.45
2020
(167,745)
674,913
0.56
Most Important Measures to Determine 2024 Compensation Actually Paid
ROAA
ROAE
Nonperforming asset ratio, as defined in the STIP
Net charge-off ratio
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
90
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE 
SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL 
Proposal Snapshot
What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, to approve, on 
an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs for 2024, as described in the “Compensation 
Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 48 and the “Executive Compensation” 
section beginning on page 66.
Voting recommendation:
FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation. The Compensation Committee 
takes its stewardship responsibility to oversee the Company’s compensation programs very 
seriously and values thoughtful input from stockholders. The Compensation Committee will take 
into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation 
decisions.
This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-On-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity 
to express their views on our NEO compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any 
specific item of compensation or any specific NEO, but rather the overall compensation of all of our 
NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. 
The compensation of our NEOs subject to the vote is disclosed in the Executive Compensation Tables 
and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement. As discussed in those disclosures, 
we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are focused on ensuring management’s 
interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term stockholder value creation. 
Compensation of our NEOs is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced 
executives to lead us successfully in a competitive environment.
Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our NEOs 
as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” the following 
resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders hereby approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the 
compensation of our named executive officers as reflected in this proxy statement and as disclosed 
pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the compensation discussion and analysis, the 
compensation tables, narratives and all related material.”
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the views expressed 
by our stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to our management and 
Board. Our Compensation Committee intends to consider results of this vote when evaluating our 
compensation policies and practices in the future. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 91
Advisory approval of this Proposal 2 requires that the proposal receive “For” votes from the holders of 
a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at 
the Annual Meeting that cast votes with respect to this Proposal 2. Abstentions and broker non-votes 
will count towards a quorum, but will have no effect on the outcome of this Proposal 2.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE 
“FOR” THE ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE  
SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL 

|  2025 Proxy Statement
92
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC 
ACCOUNTING FIRM
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT 
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
Proposal Snapshot
What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP to serve as the 
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 
2025. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered 
public accounting firm, as a matter of good corporate governance, the Board submits its selection 
of the independent registered public accounting firm to our stockholders for ratification. If our 
stockholders should not ratify the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP, the Audit Committee will 
reconsider the appointment.
Voting recommendation:
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP as the Company’s independent 
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.
Forvis Mazars, LLP has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Company to be the independent 
registered public accounting firm of the Company for the 2025 fiscal year. Forvis Mazars, LLP, and their 
predecessor companies, FORVIS, LLP and BKD, LLP, has served as the Company’s auditors since 2016. 
The Company has been advised by Forvis Mazars, LLP that neither it nor any of its members had any 
financial interest, direct or indirect, in the Company nor has Forvis Mazars, LLP, had any connection 
with the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries in any capacity other than as an independent 
registered public accounting firm. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Forvis Mazars, LLP as 
the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year is not required 
by the Company’s Bylaws, state law or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the appointment 
of Forvis Mazars, LLP to the Company’s stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate 
governance. If our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider this 
information when determining whether to retain Forvis Mazars, LLP for future services.
Representatives of Forvis Mazars, LLP are expected to be in attendance at the Annual Meeting and will 
be afforded the opportunity to make a statement. The representatives will also be available to respond 
to questions.
The ratification of such appointment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by 
the holders of shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE 
“FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF FORVIS MAZARS, LLP AS THE 
COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025. 

2025 Proxy Statement | 93
OTHER INFORMATION
Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors and Management 
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s 
common stock at February 21, 2025, by (i) current directors and NEOs of the Company, (ii) each person 
who is known by the Company to own beneficially 5% or more of the Company’s common stock and 
(iii) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, based on information 
furnished by such stockholders, management of the Company believes that each person has sole 
voting and dispositive power over the shares indicated as owned by such person.
The table below calculates the percentage of beneficial ownership based on 31,243,906 shares of common 
stock outstanding at February 21, 2025. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially 
owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of common 
stock subject to convertible or exercisable securities held by that person that are currently exercisable or 
convertible or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of February 21, 2025, if any. However, we did not 
deem these shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Common 
Stock Shares Beneficially 
Owned
(#)
Percent
of Class
(%)
5% Holders
BlackRock, Inc.(1)
2,663,229
8.5
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc.(2)
2,550,352
8.2
Vanguard Group Inc.(3)
1,639,682
5.2
All Directors, Nominees and Named Executive Officers
Daniel Chu(4)
3,983
*
James D’Agostino, Jr.(4) (5)
63,572
*
James Davison, Jr.(4)
671,954
2.2
Jay Dyer(4) (6)
130,131
*
A. La’Verne Edney(4)
4,899
*
Meryl Farr(4)
4,899
*
Richard Gallot, Jr.(4)
7,969
*
Stacey Goff(4)
7,276
*
M. Lance Hall(7)
62,499
*
Cecil Jones(8)
2,733
*
Michael Jones(4)
212,206
*
Gary Luffey(4)
158,642
*
Farrell Malone(4)
11,367
*
Derek McGee(9)
15,489
*
Drake Mills(10)
204,431
*
Preston Moore(11)
63,581
*
Lori Sirman(12)
219,120
*
Elizabeth Solender(4) (13)
18,669
*
Steven Taylor(4)
55,881
*
William Wallace, IV(14)
8,870
*
All Directors Nominees and Executive Officers, as a group (22 persons)
1,996,273
OTHER INFORMATION

|  2025 Proxy Statement
94
* Less than 1%.
(1)	
Represents shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned at December 31, 2024, based on the Schedule 13F-HR filed by 
BlackRock, Inc. on February 7, 2025. According to the Schedule 13F-HR, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 2,576,021 
shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,663,229 shares of the Company’s common stock. The mailing address for BlackRock, Inc. 
is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.
(2)	
Represents shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned at December 31, 2024, based on the Schedule 13F-HR filed by 
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. on February 14, 2025. According to the Schedule 13F-HR, T. Rowe Price Investment Management, 
Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 2,550,352 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,550,352 shares of the Company’s 
common stock. The mailing address for T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
(3)	
Represents shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned at December 31, 2024, based on the Schedule 13F-HR filed by 
Vanguard Group Inc on February 11, 2025. According to the Schedule 13F-HR, Vanguard Group Inc has sole voting power with respect to 
0 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,593,077 shares of the Company’s common stock. The mailing address for Vanguard 
Group Inc is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(4)	
Includes 1,514 shares of unvested restricted stock.
(5)	
Includes 18,131 shares of common stock held by Houston Trust Company. Mr. D’Agostino, Jr. serves as chairman of the Board of Directors 
and on the Investment Committee of Houston Trust Company and has shared voting and dispositive power over the shares. Mr. D’Agostino, 
Jr. disclaims any beneficial ownership in the shares of common stock held by Houston Trust Company, except to the extent of his pecuniary 
interest in Houston Trust Company. Pursuant to SEC rules, the inclusion of these securities in this proxy statement shall not be deemed 
an admission of beneficial ownership of all of the reported securities by any reporting person for purposes of Section 16 or for any other 
purpose. Additionally, his holdings include 26,544 shares held jointly by Mr. D’Agostino, Jr. and his spouse.
(6)	
Includes 57,906 shares of common stock held by SBSPBL, LP. Mr. Dyer has investment control over the shares held or controlled by SBSPBL, 
LP, a limited partnership. Mr. Dyer disclaims any beneficial ownership in the shares of common stock held by SBSPBL, LP, except to the 
extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Pursuant to SEC rules, the inclusion of these securities in this proxy statement shall not be deemed 
an admission of beneficial ownership of all of the reported securities by any reporting person for purposes of Section 16 or for any other 
purpose. Additionally, Mr. Dyer’s holdings include 3,822 held of record in an individual retirement account for his benefit, 18,781 shares held 
in the Employee 401(k) and 97 shares held by Mr. Dyer’s children.
(7)	
Includes 34,874 shares held in the Employee 401(k) allocated to Mr. Hall’s account.
(8)	
Includes 733 shares of unvested restricted stock.
(9)	
Includes 735 shares held of record in an individual retirement account for his benefit and 464 shares held in the Employee 401(k).
(10)	 Includes 3,466 shares held of record in an individual retirement account for his benefit and 56,095 shares held in the 401(k) allocated to 
Mr. Mills’ account.
(11)	 Includes 46,724 shares held jointly by Mr. Moore and his spouse, 13,760 shares held in the Employee 401(k), 1,500 shares held of record in 
an individual retirement account for Mr. Moore’s benefit and 1,597 vested, but deferred shares held for his benefit.
(12)	 Includes 98,299 fully vested and exercisable options, 8,829 shares held of record in an individual retirement account for Ms. Sirman’s benefit, 
and 25,309 shares held in the Employee 401(k) allocated to Ms. Sirman’s account.
(13)	 Includes 7,000 shares held of record in an individual retirement account for Ms. Solender’s benefit.
(14)	 Includes 1,792 shares held in the Employee 401(k) allocated to Mr. Wallace’s account.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires the Company’s directors and certain officers, as well as persons 
who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, to file reports 
regarding their initial stock ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC. Based 
solely on a review of the reports filed for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, and related written 
representations, we believe that all Section 16(a) reports were filed on a timely basis.
OTHER INFORMATION

2025 Proxy Statement | 95
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, are included in our Annual 
Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025. Our annual report and 
this proxy statement are posted on our website at www.origin.bank and are available from the SEC 
at its website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of our annual report and any exhibits 
thereto without charge by sending a written request to Investor Relations, Origin Bancorp, Inc., 
500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270. The Annual Report on Form 10-K includes 
financial statements required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 2024, and the report thereon of Forvis Mazars, LLP, the Company’s independent 
registered public accounting firm. The annual report is not incorporated into this proxy statement and 
is not considered proxy-soliciting material.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

|  2025 Proxy Statement
96
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the 
delivery requirements for proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same 
address by delivering a single set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, 
which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means additional convenience for 
stockholders and cost savings for companies by reducing printing and postage costs.
This year, we expect that a number of brokers with account holders who are stockholders will be 
“householding” the Company’s proxy materials. If you have received a notice from your broker that 
they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you 
are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. Stockholders should contact their brokers if 
they currently receive multiple copies of the Notice or of printed proxy materials at their addresses and 
would like to request “householding” of their communications or, alternatively, if such stockholder no 
longer wishes to participate in “householding” who would prefer to receive separate copies.
A single Notice or, if applicable, a single set of printed proxy materials will be delivered to multiple 
stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received by the Company from 
the affected stockholders. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and 
would prefer to receive a separate Notice or set of printed proxy materials, please direct your written 
request to Corporate Secretary, at 500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270, or contact 
the Company at (318) 255-2222. 
	 ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
	 Jim Crotwell
	 Corporate Secretary
	 Ruston, Louisiana
	 March 13, 2025
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY 
MATERIALS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K 
(Mark One)
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 
OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 
ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ____________ to __________
Commission file number 001-38487 
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Louisiana
72-1192928
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification Number)
500 South Service Road East
Ruston, Louisiana
71270
(Address of principal executive 
office)
(Zip code)
(318) 255-2222  
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area 
code)
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of Exchange on which Registered
Common Stock, par value $5.00 per 
share
OBK
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No 
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ 
No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) 
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted 
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting 
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting 
company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer  ☒
Accelerated filer
☐Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting 
company
☐
Emerging growth 
company
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for 
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness 
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered 
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the 
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based 
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $927.7 million 
as of June 30, 2024, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Solely for the purpose of 
this computation, it has been assumed that executive officers and directors of the Registrant are “affiliates”.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 31,212,430 
shares of Common Stock, par value $5.00 per share, were issued and outstanding as of February 14, 2025.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 
Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Origin Bancorp, Inc. 
to be held on April 23, 2025, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated 
herein. Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of 
the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-K
DECEMBER 31, 2024
INDEX
Page
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
4
PART I
6
Item 1. Business
6
Item 1A. Risk Factors
26
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
47
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
47
Item 2. Properties
49
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
49
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
49
PART II
50
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
50
Item 6. [Reserved]
51
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
52
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
75
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
78
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
140
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
140
Item 9B. Other Information
142
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevent Inspections
142
PART III
143
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
143
Item 11. Executive Compensation
143
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
143
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
143
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
144
PART IV
145
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
145
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
147
Signatures
148

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the 
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements 
preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “foresees,” 
“intends,” “plans,” “projects,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “could,” “may,” “might,” 
“should,” “will,” and “would,” or variations or negatives of such terms are generally forward-looking in nature and not 
historical facts, although not all forward-looking statements include the foregoing words. Forward-looking statements are not 
historical facts, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs 
and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our 
control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and 
are subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations 
reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially 
different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
There are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in 
these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
economic uncertainty or a deterioration in economic conditions or slowdowns in economic growth in the United 
States generally, and particularly in the market areas in which we operate and in which our loans are concentrated, 
including declines in home sale volumes and financial stress on borrowers (consumers and businesses) as a result of 
fluctuating interest rates or an uncertain economic environment;
•
adverse developments in the banking industry highlighted by high-profile bank failures and the impact of such 
developments on customer confidence, liquidity, and regulatory responses to these developments (including 
increases in the cost of our deposit insurance assessments and increased regulatory scrutiny), our ability to 
effectively manage our liquidity risk and any growth plans and the availability of capital and funding;
•
our ability to comply with applicable capital and liquidity requirements, including our ability to generate liquidity 
internally or raise capital on favorable terms, including continued access to the debt and equity capital markets;
•
fluctuating and/or volatile interest rates, capital markets and the impact of inflation on our business, financial results, 
financial projections, models and guidance, as well as the impact on our customers (including the velocity and levels 
of deposit withdrawals and loan repayments);
•
changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins;
•
prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions may vary substantially 
from period to period;
•
global business and economic conditions and in the financial services industry, nationally and within our local 
market areas;
•
an increase in unemployment levels, slowdowns in economic growth and threats of recession;
•
customer income, creditworthiness and confidence, spending and savings that may affect customer bankruptcies, 
defaults, charge-offs and deposit activity;
•
the credit risk associated with the substantial amount of commercial real estate, construction and land development, 
and commercial loans in our loan portfolio;
•
the credit risks of lending activities, including our ability to estimate credit losses and the allowance for credit losses, 
as well as the effects of changes in the level of, and trends in, loan delinquencies and write-offs.
•
factors that can impact the performance of our loan portfolio, including real estate values and liquidity in our 
primary market areas, the financial health of our commercial borrowers and the success of construction projects that 
we finance, including any loans acquired in merger/acquisition transactions;
•
changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial real estate, especially as they relate to 
the value of collateral supporting the Company’s loans;
4

•
natural disasters and adverse weather events (including hurricanes), acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities, 
(including the impacts related to or resulting from Russia’s military action in Ukraine, and the ongoing conflict in 
Israel and the surrounding region, including the imposition of additional sanctions and export controls, as well as the 
broader impacts to financial markets and the global macroeconomic and geopolitical environments), regional or 
national protests and civil unrest (including any resulting branch closures or property damage), widespread illness or 
public health outbreaks or other international or domestic calamities, and other matters beyond our control;
•
system failures, cybersecurity threats and/or security breaches and the cost of defending against them and any 
reputational or other financial risks following such a cybersecurity incident;
•
the failure to maintain an effective system of controls and procedures, including internal control over financial and 
non-financial reporting;
•
deterioration of our asset quality;
•
risks associated with widespread inflation or deflation;
•
the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including our ability to continue to identify acquisition or merger 
targets and successfully acquire and integrate desirable financial institutions;
•
changes in the value of collateral securing our loans;
•
our ability to anticipate interest rate changes and manage interest rate risk;
•
the effectiveness of our risk management framework and quantitative models;
•
the impact of fraud or misconduct by internal or external parties which we may not be able to prevent, detect or 
mitigate;
•
our inability to receive dividends from our bank subsidiary and to service debt, pay dividends to our common 
stockholders, repurchase our shares of common stock and satisfy obligations as they become due;
•
changes in our operation or expansion strategy or our ability to prudently manage our growth and execute our 
strategy;
•
changes in management personnel;
•
our ability to maintain important deposit customer relationships, our reputation or otherwise avoid liquidity risks;
•
increasing costs as we grow and compete for deposits;
•
operational risks associated with our business;
•
increased competition in the financial services industry, particularly from regional and national institutions, as well 
as fintech companies, may accelerate due to the current economic environment;
•
our level of nonperforming assets and the costs associated with resolving any problem loans, including litigation and 
other costs;
•
potential claims, damages, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation, 
regulatory proceedings or enforcement actions;
•
risks related to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategies and initiatives, the scope and pace of which 
could alter our reputation and shareholder, associate, customer and third-party affiliations;
•
changes in the utility of our non-GAAP measurements and their underlying assumptions or estimates;
•
changes in the laws, rules, regulations, interpretations or policies relating to financial institutions, as well as tax, 
trade, monetary and fiscal matters;
•
periodic changes to the extensive body of accounting rules and best practices, may change the treatment and 
recognition of critical financial line items and affect our profitability;
5

•
further government intervention in the U.S. financial system;
•
compliance with governmental and regulatory requirements, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and others relating to banking, consumer protection, securities 
and tax matters;
•
a deterioration of the credit rating for U.S. long-term sovereign debt, actions that the U.S. government may take to 
avoid exceeding the debt ceiling, and uncertainties surrounding the debt ceiling and the federal budget;
•
the risk that the regulatory environment may not be conducive to, or may prohibit the consummation of, future 
mergers and/or business combinations, may increase the length of time and amount of resources required to 
consummate such transactions, and the potential to reduce anticipated benefits from such mergers or combinations; 
and
•
our ability to manage the risks involved in the foregoing.
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary 
statements included in this report. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our 
underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what we anticipate. In addition, as a 
result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied upon as an indication of future 
performance. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking 
statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review 
any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. New risks and 
uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. In 
addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of 
factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
PART I
Item 1. 
Business
Our Company
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our 
company,” “the Company” or “Origin” refer to Origin Bancorp, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, and its consolidated 
subsidiaries. All references to “Origin Bank” or “the Bank” refer to Origin Bank, our wholly-owned bank subsidiary.
Origin Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Ruston, Louisiana. Our wholly owned bank 
subsidiary, Origin Bank, was founded in 1912 in Choudrant, Louisiana. Deeply rooted in our history is a culture committed to 
providing personalized, relationship banking to businesses, municipalities, and personal clients to enrich the lives of the 
people in the communities we serve. We provide a broad range of financial services and currently operates more than 60 
locations in Dallas/Fort Worth, East Texas, Houston, North Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and the Florida 
Panhandle. As noted in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, 
Results of Operations, Noninterest Expense section of this report we expect to close six of these banking centers at the end of 
February 2025. At December 31, 2024, we had total assets of $9.68 billion, total loans held for investment (“LHFI”) of $7.57 
billion, total deposits of $8.22 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $1.15 billion.
We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in May 2018 and began trading on the Nasdaq Stock 
Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “OBNK”. On May 9, 2023, the Company provided written notice to Nasdaq of its 
determination to voluntarily withdraw the listing of the Company’s common stock from Nasdaq and transfer the listing to the 
New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The listing and trading of the common stock on Nasdaq ended at market close on May 
19, 2023, and trading commenced on the NYSE at market open on May 22, 2023, under the new stock symbol “OBK”.
We are committed to building unique client experiences through a strong culture, experienced leadership team and a 
focus on delivering unmatched customer service throughout Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and now in South Alabama and the 
Florida Panhandle. Our success has been based on (1) a talented team of relationship bankers, executives and directors; (2) a 
diverse footprint with stable and growth-oriented markets; (3) differentiated and customized delivery and service; (4) our core 
deposit franchise and (5) an ability to significantly leverage our infrastructure and technology.
6

Successful execution of our strategic plan has produced significant growth in our franchise. Since 2005, we have 
enhanced our growth by integrating four bank acquisitions, entering de novo into several expansion markets, expanding our 
product offerings in mortgage lending as well as in insurance and private banking. We have supported our markets by hiring 
a number of experienced in-market bankers and banking teams. In 2024, we entered our Southeast market, consisting of 
South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle, with two banking locations staffed with experienced relationship bankers and 
their support personnel. To support our growth, we have raised over $589.6 million of new Tier 1 capital since 2006, 
including proceeds from our initial public offering completed in May 2018, we issued subordinated notes that are treated as 
Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes in 2020, and we completed an all stock merger valued at $307.8 million in 2022. 
Through these efforts, we have successfully increased our market share in our key geographic markets.
Our Competitive Strengths and Banking Strategy
Organic Growth Capabilities with Strategic Acquisitions
We have historically been able to demonstrate our ability to grow our loans and deposits organically. Our team of 
seasoned bankers has been an important driver of our organic growth by further developing banking relationships with 
current and potential clients. Our relationship bankers are motivated to increase the size of their loan and deposit portfolios 
and generate fee income while maintaining strong credit quality. To promote our organic growth, we strategically locate 
banking centers within our markets and employ highly experienced relationship bankers who proactively develop valuable 
relationships within the communities that we serve. Through these relationships, our bankers are able to meet our customers’ 
needs and capitalize on loan demand across a wide range of industries. This allows us to not only diversify our loan portfolio, 
but also focus on loans with quality credit characteristics.
We focus on generating and retaining core deposits as our primary funding source to support loan growth. We 
believe motivating our relationship bankers to generate strong deposit growth enhances our ability to build and strengthen 
client relationships and provide stable funding for future growth.
We will continue to evaluate selective acquisition opportunities that we believe could enhance our business model 
within our attractive geographic footprint and other complementary markets.
A Unique from Within Client Experience
Our mission is to passionately pursue ways to make banking and insurance more rewarding for our employees, 
customers, communities, and stockholders. We have a deep commitment to providing an unmatched client experience that 
exceeds our customers’ expectations. We believe by aligning our processes, philosophy, technology, and culture; we create a 
seamless experience that goes beyond the transactional and becomes transformational. Trust, encouraging strong work ethic, 
innovation, flexibility, forward-thinking, genuine respect for others, commitment to our community, and never compromising 
our integrity are our values, and are the foundation of our company.
Concentration on Sound Asset Quality
We believe that asset quality is a key to long-term financial success. We seek to maintain sound asset quality by 
moderating credit risk, adhering to prudent lending practices and promoting a relationship-based approach to commercial and 
consumer banking. Our executive management team has extensive knowledge of the bank regulatory landscape, significant 
experience navigating interest rate and credit cycles and a long history of collaboration, which we believe may help us avoid 
or mitigate unforeseen losses.
Expanding Revenue Sources
We offer commercial and retail customers a wide range of products and services that provide us with a diversified 
revenue stream and help us to solidify customer relationships. We provide products and services that compete with large, 
national banks but with the personalized attention and responsiveness of a relationship-focused community bank. Our 
offerings include traditional retail deposits, treasury management, commercial deposits, commercial and consumer loans, 
mortgage origination, insurance, mobile banking and online banking. Our clients value our ability to provide the sophisticated 
products and services of larger banks, but with a local and agile decision-making process, a focus on building personal 
relationships, and a commitment to investing in the local economy and community. This allows us to build Origin Bank by 
focusing on stable core deposit relationships, high credit quality loans, and fee income generated by value-added services. It 
also allows us to develop strong relationships across industries, creating a diverse commercial loan portfolio.
7

We believe we have an attractive mix of loans and deposits. At December 31, 2024, our loans held for investment 
(“LHFI”) portfolio was comprised of 31.1% commercial and industrial loans including mortgage warehouse loans, and 44.1 
commercial real estate loans, including construction/land/land development loans. Our commercial real estate loans are 
39.4% owner occupied and 60.6% non-owner occupied. At December 31, 2024, approximately 23.1% of our deposits were 
noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
We recently announced Optimize Origin, which is an initiative to drive elite financial performance and enhance our 
award-winning culture built on three primary pillars:
•
Productivity, Delivery & Efficiency
•
Balance Sheet Optimization
•
Culture & Employee Engagement
This initiative established a near term target of greater than a 1% ROAA run rate by the fourth quarter of 2025 and 
an ultimate target of top quartile ROAA, achieved in part by branch consolidations, headcount reductions, securities 
optimization, capital optimization, and cash/liquidity management. We believe the actions we have taken to date will drive 
earnings improvement of approximately $20.0 million annually on a pre-tax basis.
Our Markets
We currently operate in the markets of Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, East Texas, North Louisiana, Mississippi, South 
Alabama and the Florida Panhandle, all of which offer attractive combinations of diversity, growth and stability. 
The Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston markets represent two of the largest and fastest-growing metropolitan areas in 
the country. These markets provide attractive economic environments and offer significant deposit and lending opportunities 
as they are home to many large and mid-size corporations across a wide range of industries that include healthcare, 
manufacturing, construction, higher education, agriculture, energy, transportation and technology.
In 2022, we entered the East Texas market and expanded our footprint across the I-20 corridor. The BT Holdings, 
Inc., (“BTH”) merger solidified our presence in the Dallas/ Fort Worth market. We believe the strong reputation and 
commitment of both banks will provide growth in both markets and allow us to strengthen relationships in the communities 
we serve.
The North Louisiana markets offer a stable economic climate with lower costs associated with deposit gathering and 
our operational platform. Our footprint in Mississippi comprises areas of significant commercial investment and additional 
growth opportunities. In 2024, we entered our Southeast market, consisting of South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle, 
with two banking locations staffed with experienced relationship bankers and their support personnel. The Southeast market 
is supported by strong economic growth, a skilled workforce, and strong defense industry presence, along with expanding 
infrastructure. We believe all of our markets provide favorable business climates and continued opportunity for growth, and 
now with our expansion into Southern Alabama and the Florida Panhandle we have further grown our presence across the 
lower half of the United States.
Our Banking Services
We are focused on delivering a broad range of relationship-driven financial services tailored to meet the needs of 
small and medium-sized businesses, municipalities, and retail clients. We principally operate in one business segment, 
community banking. We are primarily engaged in attracting deposits from individuals and businesses and using these 
deposits and borrowed funds to originate commercial, residential mortgage, construction and consumer loans.
We have primarily grown our assets, deposits, and business organically by building relationships through our 
lending products, expanding our deposit products and delivery capabilities, opening new branches, and hiring experienced 
bankers with existing customer relationships in our market areas.
A general discussion of the range of financial services we offer follows.
8

Lending Activities
We originate loans secured by single and multi-family real estate, residential construction and commercial buildings. 
In addition, we make loans to small and mid-sized businesses, as well as to consumers for a variety of purposes. Our loan 
portfolio at the dates indicated was comprised as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
Real estate: 
2024
2023
Owner occupied commercial real estate
$ 
975,947 
$ 
953,822 
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate
 
1,501,484 
 
1,488,912 
Total commercial real estate
 
2,477,431 
 
2,442,734 
Construction/land/land development
 
864,011 
 
1,070,225 
Residential real estate
 
1,857,589 
 
1,734,935 
Total real estate
 
5,199,031 
 
5,247,894 
Commercial and industrial
 
2,002,634 
 
2,059,460 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
349,081 
 
329,966 
Consumer loans
 
22,967 
 
23,624 
Total LHFI
$ 
7,573,713 
$ 
7,660,944 
Commercial Real Estate Loans and Construction/Land/Land Development Loans. We primarily originate 
commercial real estate loans and construction/land/land development loans that are generally secured by real estate located in 
our market areas. Our commercial mortgage loans are generally collateralized by first liens on real estate and amortized over 
20 to 30 years, with balloon payments typically due at the end of five years. These loans are generally underwritten by 
addressing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of repayment, the financial strength of 
any guarantor, the strength of the tenant (if any), the borrower’s liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership 
structure, economic conditions, industry-specific trends and collateral. Commercial real estate loans have contributed interest 
income of $146.5 million, $135.1 million and $88.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, 
respectively, while construction/land/land development loans have contributed interest income of $73.9 million, $69.6 
million and $36.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Consumer Loans and Residential Real Estate Loans. Our consumer loan portfolio is primarily composed of secured 
and unsecured loans that we originate. The largest component of our consumer loan portfolio is for residential real estate 
purposes. We originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans generally secured by property located in our primary 
market areas. These loans are underwritten by giving consideration to the borrower’s ability to pay, stability of employment 
or source of income, debt-to-income ratio, credit history and loan-to-value ratio. Consumer loans also include closed-end 
second mortgages, home equity lines of credit and our mortgage loans held for sale. Consumer and residential real estate 
loans have contributed interest income of $100.6 million, $83.9 million and $51.1 million for the years ended December 31, 
2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. Commercial and industrial loans are made for a variety of business purposes, 
including working capital, inventory, equipment and capital expansion. The terms for commercial loans are generally one to 
seven years. Commercial loans are generally underwritten by addressing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary and 
secondary sources of repayment, the financial strength of any guarantor, the borrower’s liquidity and leverage, management 
experience, ownership structure, economic conditions, industry specific trends and collateral. Commercial and industrial 
loans have contributed interest income of $163.9 million, $155.8 million and $90.5 million for the years ended December 31, 
2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Mortgage Warehouse Loans. Mortgage warehouse loans are extended to mortgage companies and secured by loan 
participations in mortgages that are typically sold within 15 to 25 days. The loans are underwritten by the approved mortgage 
company using agency or investor guidelines. The loans are then committed to a secondary market investor and are primarily 
made up of agency-eligible conventional loans (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac), government loans (Federal Housing 
Administration (“FHA”) loans, Veterans Administration loans, U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Development 
loans) and qualified jumbo loans. Mortgage warehouse loans have contributed interest income of $31.6 million, $21.5 million 
and $18.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
9

Credit Risks. The principal economic risk associated with each category of loans we make is the creditworthiness of 
the borrower and the ability of the borrower to repay the relevant loan. Borrower creditworthiness is affected by general 
economic conditions, including interest rates, inflation, and in the case of commercial borrowers, demand for the borrower’s 
products and services, and other factors affecting the borrower’s customers, suppliers and employees.
Mortgage warehouse loan risk is primarily centered in the borrower’s adherence to agency or investor underwriting 
guidelines, while the risk associated with the underlying consumer mortgage loan repayment, as similar to other consumer 
loans, depends on the borrower’s financial stability and are more likely than commercial loans to be adversely affected by 
divorce, job loss, illness and other personal hardships.
Risks associated with real estate loans also include fluctuations in the value of real estate, new job creation trends, 
tenant vacancy rates, economic downturns that create the need for temporary payment forbearances and, in the case of 
commercial borrowers, the quality of the borrower’s management. Consumer loan repayments depend on the borrower’s 
financial stability and are more likely than commercial loans to be adversely affected by divorce, job loss, illness and other 
personal hardships.
Lending Philosophy. Our lending philosophy is driven by our commitment to centralized underwriting for all loans, 
local market knowledge, long-term customer relationships and a conservative credit culture. To implement this philosophy, 
we have established various levels of authority and review, including our Credit Risk Management Group. In each loan 
review, we emphasize cash flow and secondary and tertiary repayment sources, such as guarantors and collateral. We 
generally avoid lending to highly cyclical industries and typically avoid making certain types of loans that we consider to be 
higher risk.
Lending Policies. We have established common documentation requirements and policies for each type of loan. We 
have also established a corporate loan committee with authority to approve loans up to the legal lending limit of Origin Bank. 
During 2024, credit relationships of $8.0 million or greater were generally presented to the corporate loan committee for 
approval or ratification of approval prior to committing to the loan. The corporate loan committee meets weekly and on an ad 
hoc basis as needed.
Origin Bank’s board of directors reviews our lending policies and procedures at least annually. In addition, there are 
legal restrictions on the maximum amount of loans available for each lending relationship. Origin Bank is subject to certain 
legal lending limits under the Louisiana Banking Law and Federal Reserve Regulation O. At December 31, 2024, we had 
established a general in-house lending limit ranging between $30.0 million and $35.0 million to any one borrower, excluding 
mortgage warehouse lines of credit, based upon our internal risk rating of the relationship. Due to multiple sources of 
repayment, mortgage warehouse lines of credit have a general in-house lending limit ranging between $75.0 million and 
$100.0 million to any one borrower.
Deposits and Other Sources of Funds
An important aspect of our business franchise is the ability to gather deposits. At December 31, 2024, we held $8.22 
billion of total deposits and have grown deposits at a compound annual growth rate of 17.2% since December 31, 2003. At 
December 31, 2024, 93.4 of our total deposits were core deposits (defined as total deposits excluding time deposits greater 
than $250,000, brokered and Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service deposits). We offer a wide range of deposit 
services, including checking, savings, money market accounts and time deposits. We obtain most of our deposits from 
individuals, small businesses and municipalities in our market areas. At December 31, 2024, 54.8 of our deposits were 
business deposits, 32.6 were consumer deposits and 11.7 were public fund deposits. We employ a deposit-focused sales force 
of business development bankers who have extensive contacts and connections with targeted clients and centers of influence 
throughout our communities. We also have access to secondary sources of funding, including advances from the Federal 
Home Loan Bank of Dallas, borrowings at the Federal Reserve Discount Window and other borrowings.
Mortgage Banking
We are also engaged in the residential mortgage banking business, which primarily generates income from the sale 
of mortgage loans. We originate residential mortgage loans in our markets as a service to our existing customers and as a way 
to develop relationships with new customers in order to support our core banking strategy. Revenue from our mortgage 
banking activities was $6.6 million, $3.4 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, 
respectively. In early 2024, we sold substantially all of our mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) asset and recorded a $410,000 
gain on the sale.
10

Insurance
We offer a wide variety of commercial and personal property and casualty insurance products through our wholly-
owned insurance agency subsidiary, Forth Insurance. With over 35 years of growth in the insurance industry and over 130 
experienced professionals, our agency has primary market locations across Louisiana, but also serves customers in Texas, 
Mississippi, Arkansas and other states across the United States. Insurance commission and fee income was $26.8 million, 
$25.1 million and $22.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Other Banking Services
Given customer demand for increased convenience and account access, we offer a wide range of products and 
services, including 24-hour internet banking and voice response information, mobile applications, cash management, business 
credit cards, overdraft protection, direct deposit, safe deposit boxes, automatic account transfers, peer-to-peer electronic pay 
solutions and personal financial management solutions.
Information Technology Systems
We continue to make significant investments in our information technology systems for our banking operations and 
treasury services to enhance our capabilities to offer new products and overall customer experience, to provide scale for 
future growth and acquisitions, and to increase controls and efficiencies in our back-office operations. Our core data 
processing platform is from a nationally-recognized bank processing vendor, and we leverage the capabilities of a third-party 
service provider in developing our network design and architecture. We also actively manage our business continuity plan 
and utilize top tier cybersecurity solutions within our networks. The majority of our other systems, including electronic funds 
transfer and transaction processing, are operated in-house. Online banking services and other public-facing web services are 
performed using third-party service providers. We strive to follow all recommendations outlined by the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council and we perform regular tests of the adequacy of our contingency plans for key functions 
and systems.
Competition
The banking business is highly competitive, and our profitability will depend in large part on our ability to compete 
with other banks and nonbank financial service companies located in our markets for lending opportunities, deposit funds, 
financial products, bankers and acquisition targets.
We are subject to vigorous competition in all aspects of our business from banks, savings banks, savings and loan 
associations, finance companies, credit unions, technology companies, and other financial service providers, such as money 
market funds, fintech companies, brokerage firms, consumer finance companies, asset-based nonbank lenders, insurance 
companies and certain other non-financial entities, including retail stores which may maintain their own credit programs and 
certain governmental organizations which may offer more favorable financing than we can.
Many other commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions have offices in our primary market areas. 
These institutions include many of the largest banks operating in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and the 
Panhandle of Florida, including various national banks. Our competitors often have greater resources, have broader 
geographic markets, have higher lending limits, offer various services that we may not currently offer and make broader use 
of media advertising, support services and electronic technology than we do. To offset these competitive disadvantages, we 
depend on our reputation as having greater personal service, consistency, flexibility and the ability to make credit and other 
business decisions quickly.
Human Capital Management
At December 31, 2024, we had 1,031 full-time equivalent employees, who benefit from a variety of initiatives 
designed to retain, grow, and develop them in becoming the best versions of themselves. At Origin, our culture has always 
been the foundation of our success. We work to define our culture in everything we do. It is in our attitudes, our diversity, our 
core values; it is in our interactions with our customers and communities. Culture is the soul of who we are as a company, 
and it starts with our employees.
11

Social Impact
At Origin, we believe success is built on the collaborative efforts of exceptional talent. Our ongoing focus is to 
leverage this diverse array of knowledge and skills, fostering an inclusive environment that is a driving force for sustained 
growth. Making a difference for our customers starts with setting an example through our own actions. We employ proven, 
knowledgeable team members with extensive expertise when it comes to our banking and insurance activities. Each member 
of our Origin team brings their own personal experiences and interests to inform the service they provide. In addition, we 
learn from our customers and use this new understanding to go out and improve the places we call home.
One of our core values is genuine respect for yourself and others. This value makes the support of diversity, equity 
and inclusion a natural fit for our culture and essential to the way we conduct business, foster individual and team 
enrichment, and participate in our communities. We believe it is only with a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace that 
the organization can truly perform at its best, carry out its vision, and make a difference in the communities we serve. In 
2023, Origin Bank announced the formation of the Diversity Council, which consists of 17 diverse employees that 
collectively advance our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts in a way that makes a difference within our workplace and in 
the communities we serve. We believe all employees should be given opportunities to perform to their full potential, knowing 
their performance will be measured and rewarded fairly.
Health & Wellness
We provide competitive compensation and benefits in order to attract and retain top talent. In addition to base pay 
and stock awards, we administer several incentive programs that are designed to link performance to pay and drive results 
towards the achievement of overall corporate goals. We offer robust health, wellness and financial benefits as detailed below. 
In addition, we provide unique and exclusive benefits through programs such as DreamManager®, Smart Dollar, Origin 
Leadership Academies and Project Enrich.
We are committed to our employees' mental and physical health and safety. We offer a robust benefits package 
which includes:
•
Comprehensive medical benefits with $0 cost options for employees
•
Competitive ancillary benefits, such as dental, vision, critical illness, legal and identify theft coverage
•
Generous paid time off (“PTO”) policy
•
Company-paid short and long-term disability and life insurance
•
Flexible spending accounts for both healthcare and dependent care 
•
Health savings accounts with Company contributions
•
401(k) retirement savings program with Company match, along with free access to financial advisors to assist with 
retirement planning
•
Employee Stock Purchase Program
•
Paid parental leave
•
Employee Assistance Program which offers counseling and mental wellness appointments at no cost to the 
employee
12

Employee Engagement
Our Dream Manager® program assists our employees in meeting their own personal and professional goals in 
addition to helping them improve physically, emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually. Over 300 employees have 
participated in this program since 2019. We also offer a nationally-recognized financial wellness program (“SmartDollar”) 
that is designed to assist our employees in becoming debt-free and in saving money for emergencies and retirement, 
empowering them to become better financially prepared for their future, which during 2024, had an over 46% participation 
rate. Due to our adoption rate, we won a national award in 2021 from the Dave Ramsey Foundation called the “Vision” 
award. We employ a full-time certified Holistic Health Coach who spearheads our Health & Wellness initiatives. In addition 
to providing health and wellness information on a regular basis to all employees, we currently have approximately 10% of 
our employees working individually with our Health Coach to meet their desire to be healthier, physically and mentally. As 
of December 31, 2024, participants have lost a total of 4,560 pounds.
Community & Volunteerism
Since our inception, we have been deeply committed to building relationships and making a difference in our local 
communities. Investing in people, neighborhoods and local businesses is part of our mission. We strive to understand the 
needs of the people in our local communities and how we can help them attain their goals and improve the quality of lives 
throughout our footprint.
Additionally, in one specific initiative designed to help the communities we serve, our Project Enrich program 
provides employees with up to twenty hours of paid time off per year to volunteer in their communities. In 2024, the 
employees of Origin volunteered 4,615 hours in the community during working hours, not including 1,487 hours of personal 
time outside of working hours. To supplement our volunteer work, we seek out areas where we can make an additional 
impact through financial donations. Our Bank on Their Future program was created to help provide support to local schools 
and thereby invest in our community's future.
Over the past several years, Origin Bank has been recognized for our commitment to our communities and our 
customers, including:
•
United Way Circle of Honor and Gold Award
•
Spirit of Giving Award
•
Boys and Girls Club as well as multiple educational initiatives
Origin has a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act (‘CRA’) to help meet the credit needs of its 
communities. We believe that helping to meet these needs is necessary for the continued growth and vitality of our 
communities. Our current community investment strategy includes lending, broadening digital access, and increasing 
financial literacy programs. Through strategic nonprofit partnerships, inspiring volunteer experiences, and philanthropy, our 
corporate responsibility efforts are focused on creating a better world. Building on over 100 years of working in our 
community, Origin offers unique opportunities for collective action, enhancing existing giving and volunteer initiatives with 
the Origin community.
Employee Feedback
Attracting, developing and retaining talented employees is critical to our success and is an integral part of our human 
capital strategy. Employee feedback is highly valued at Origin and our employees provide anonymous input via multiple 
engagement surveys each year, facilitated by Glint, a people success platform built on an approach that helps organizations 
increase employee engagement, develop their people, and improve business results.
We receive hundreds of written comments from each survey that in turn are used to improve processes, policies, or 
programs which show tangible affirmation of those comments. We also have continued a practice that was implemented at 
the beginning of the pandemic called “The Origin Insider,” a meeting series that takes a deep dive into various topics and 
departments, and often features executive speakers. This program gives employees an inside look at executives on a personal 
level, allows employees to learn about other areas of the Bank and provides education that supports physical and mental 
awareness. These meetings occur monthly and feature internal and external speakers who discuss a wide range of topics 
designed to promote employee engagement and satisfaction. 
13

Talent Development 
We have begun to enhance our culture and talent management function by implementing a Human Capital 
Management (‘HCM’) program. We make significant investments in formal development programs to build our talent 
pipeline. Talent development at Origin begins with our comprehensive recruitment program and continues throughout the 
employee life cycle. The Company recognizes that its success is highly dependent on its ability to attract, retain and develop 
our people. To foster this development, the Company engages in annual succession planning focused on building a strong, 
diverse talent pipeline.
We conduct regular talent succession assessments along with individual performance reviews in which managers 
provide regular feedback and coaching to assist with the development of our employees, including the use of individual 
development plans to assist with career development. Our Giving Interns Valuable Experience (“G.I.V.E.”) program was 
launched in 2021 and since that time, we have welcomed a diverse group of 64 interns from 29 different universities. Over 
56% of interns have been minorities. 
We provide our employees and their families access to a platform called “Right Now Media at Work” which has 
thousands of streaming videos dedicated to both personal and professional development. This tool is designed to enhance 
work, life and leadership skills and is used for team building and individual development plans. In addition, employees can 
access a variety of personal care topics such as finances, relationships and mental health.
We utilize assessment tools such as Predictive Index to ensure employees are placed in jobs which best suit their 
skills and personalities. We also use these insights for team building by teaching employees how to better understand and 
communicate with each other based on their profile.  
We believe it is critical to support our employees in their career development goals; and, we provide various paths to 
assist employees in their development. We strive to promote from within when possible, so most open positions are posted 
internally before we begin looking externally to hire. This allows us to provide more growth opportunities for current 
employees. In addition, all employees have access to the Origin Career Center, which provides multiple resources to assist 
employees in identifying their career path goals and what steps need to be taken to enhance their promotional opportunities. 
Our Career Manager program offers young professionals one-on-one time with senior leaders to accelerate their 
understanding of the business of banking. In 2023, we launched a formal mentorship program where employees connect with 
an experienced mentor in structured sessions which prepare them for future growth opportunities.  
We provide advanced development for next-generation leaders via our formal Leadership programs, the Origin 
Leadership Academy and the Emerging Leaders Council, which provide structured training and collaboration with other 
aspiring leaders throughout the organization. The Origin Leadership Academy is a two-year program designed to prepare 
participants to move into executive roles as part of our succession planning. Participants are chosen by senior management. 
The Emerging Leaders Council is a one-year program designed to train and develop rising leaders in our organization. Both 
programs feature interactive team building activities, group projects, and in-depth leadership training.
Inclusion & Belonging
Our commitment to inclusion starts with our goal of attracting, retaining, and developing a workforce that is diverse 
in background, knowledge, skill, and experience. Origin is committed to providing equal employment opportunities, and 
makes all recruiting, payment, performance, and promotion decisions based on merit, without discrimination.
Origin is committed to enhancing our workforce at all levels of the organization and providing equal opportunity in 
all aspects of employment. In 2024, the Company continues to make progress toward attracting and retaining an inclusive 
workforce. The Company's talent acquisition team attends multiple job fairs throughout the year that allow us to connect with 
many talented and diverse candidates who may later become employed. We also have engaged a third-party workforce 
development company that utilizes a connected system of job recruiting sites that post our employment opportunities with 
various professional and industry organizations, skilled trade associations and universities. In addition, our G.I.V.E. 
internship program is designed to develop a strong pool of diverse candidates through on-campus recruiting with local 
colleges and universities, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities (“HBCUs”) in our markets. 
The Origin Diversity Council was launched in 2023 and has served to make a difference within our workplace and 
in the communities we serve. The Council hosted Origin Connections Month in November, which featured multiple fun and 
engaging opportunities for employees to build relationships and learn more about each other’s backgrounds and cultures. The 
Council also introduced a “Welcome Buddy” program which partners new hires with an employee who can help them 
14

quickly get acclimated and connected in the workplace. Members of the Diversity Council are committed to attending 
networking events and job fairs to assist in our efforts to recruit diverse candidates. 
Because of the great emphasis we place on connections, our team members form relationships with those around 
them based on mutual respect, dignity and understanding. The Company has strict non-discrimination and anti-harassment 
policies in place and these policies drive a workplace and workforce that embraces the highest ethical and moral standards. 
We surveyed our employees in regard to inclusion and belonging. Nine out of ten responses in the survey exceeded 
the benchmarks of Glint's top 10% of global companies. The previously mentioned Diversity Council was one initiative that 
was launched based on the results of the survey and it will collectively advance our diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in 
a way that makes a difference within our workplace and in the communities we serve. In 2024, our Diversity Council 
continued Employee Spotlights as a platform to drive engagement and build connections by sharing employees’ stories to 
highlight different backgrounds and cultures within our organization.
Our team members form deeper relationships with those around them based on mutual respect, dignity and 
understanding. The Company has non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies as outlined in our Employee Handbook. 
The Board oversees and periodically reviews our human rights policies, while our Chief Human Resources Officer is 
responsible for its ongoing implementation, reporting to the Board and its committees on any significant issues. These 
policies drive a workplace and workforce that embraces the highest ethical and moral standards. Furthermore, all employees 
participate in inclusion training. We also offer weekly micro lessons to our managers through a program called Blue Ocean 
Brain which supports our endeavor to reimagine inclusion in the workplace and provides our employees with a wide array of 
learning topics.
Origin has been recognized as a “Best Bank to Work For” by American Banker magazine for twelve consecutive 
years, which we believe is attributable to our deep commitment to corporate culture, and our focus on initiatives to support 
and develop our employees. This ranking is based on feedback from surveys given directly to the American Banker magazine 
from our employees.
None of our employees are represented by any collective bargaining unit or are parties to a collective bargaining 
agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Corporate Information
We were organized as a business corporation in 1991 under the laws of the state of Louisiana. Our principal 
executive offices are located at 500 South Service Road East, Ruston, Louisiana 71270, and our telephone number is (318) 
255-2222. Our website is www.origin.bank. We make available at this address, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 
10-K, our annual reports to stockholders, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to 
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended 
(“Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These documents are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. 
The information contained on, or accessible from, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K 
and is not incorporated by reference herein.
Supervision, Regulation and Other Factors
We are extensively regulated under federal and state law. The following is a brief summary that does not purport to 
be a complete description of all regulations that affect us or all aspects of those regulations. This discussion is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions described below and is not intended to be an 
exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the Company’s and Origin Bank’s business. In addition, 
proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised at both the state and federal 
levels. The likelihood and timing of any changes in these laws and regulations, and the impact such changes may have on us 
and Origin Bank, are difficult to predict. Regulatory agencies may issue enforcement actions, policy statements, interpretive 
letters and similar written guidance applicable to us or to Origin Bank. Changes in applicable laws, regulations or regulatory 
guidance, or their interpretation by regulatory agencies or courts may have a material adverse effect on our and Origin Bank’s 
business, operations, and earnings.
15

 Origin Bank, and in some cases, we and our nonbank affiliates, must undergo regular examinations by the 
appropriate regulatory agency, which will examine for adherence to a range of legal and regulatory compliance 
responsibilities. A bank regulator conducting an examination has complete access to the books and records of the examined 
institution. The results of the examination are confidential. Supervision and regulation of banks, their holding companies and 
affiliates is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and clients, the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) of the 
FDIC, and the U.S. banking and financial system rather than holders of our securities.
Regulation of the Company
We are registered as a bank holding company with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the 
“Federal Reserve”) under the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (the “BHC Act”) and have elected to be treated as a 
financial holding company. As such, we are subject to comprehensive supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve and 
are subject to its regulatory reporting requirements. Federal law subjects bank holding companies, such as the Company, to 
restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements. In addition, the 
Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions (the “OFI”) regulates bank holding companies that own Louisiana-chartered banks, 
such as us, under the bank holding company laws of the State of Louisiana. Various federal and state bodies regulate and 
supervise our non-bank activities including our insurance agency activities. These include, but are not limited to, various state 
regulators of insurance activities.
Violations of laws and regulations, or other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in regulatory agencies 
imposing fines or penalties, cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these 
agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees and other parties participating in the 
affairs of a bank or bank holding company. Like all bank holding companies, we are regulated extensively under federal and 
state law. Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository 
institutions, state banking regulators, the Federal Reserve, and separately the FDIC as the insurer of bank deposits, have the 
authority to compel or restrict certain actions on our part if they determine that we have insufficient capital or other resources, 
or are otherwise operating in a manner that may be deemed to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. Under 
this authority, our regulators can require us or our subsidiaries to enter into informal or formal supervisory agreements, 
including board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements and consent or cease and desist orders, 
pursuant to which we would be required to take identified corrective actions to address cited concerns and to refrain from 
taking certain actions.
If we become subject to and are unable to comply with the terms of any regulatory actions or directives, supervisory 
agreements, or orders, then we could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders, possibly 
including prompt corrective action restrictions and/or other regulatory actions, including prohibitions on the payment of 
dividends on our common stock and preferred stock. If our regulators were to take such supervisory actions, then we could, 
among other things, become subject to significant restrictions on our ability to develop any new business, as well as 
restrictions on our existing business, and we could be required to raise additional capital, dispose of certain assets and 
liabilities within a prescribed period of time, or both. The terms of any such action could have a material negative effect on 
our business, reputation, operating flexibility, financial condition, and the value of our securities. 
Activity Limitations
As a financial holding company, we are permitted to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities 
than those permitted for a bank holding company that has not elected to be a financial holding company. Bank holding 
companies are generally restricted to engaging in the business of banking, managing or controlling banks and certain other 
activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking. Financial holding companies may also engage 
in activities that are considered to be financial in nature, as well as those incidental or, if determined by the Federal Reserve, 
complementary to financial activities. We rely on our financial holding company status to engage in insurance agency 
activities.
If Origin Bank ceases to be “well capitalized” or “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards, or if Origin 
Bank receives a rating of less than satisfactory under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), the Federal Reserve may, 
among other things, place limitations on our ability to conduct these broader financial activities or, if the deficiencies persist, 
require us to divest the banking subsidiary or the businesses engaged in activities permissible only for financial holding 
companies.
16

In addition, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any 
nonbanking activity or terminate its ownership or control of any nonbank subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe 
that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or 
stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company. As further described below, each of the Company and Origin 
Bank is well-capitalized under applicable regulatory standards as of December 31, 2024, and Origin Bank has an overall 
rating of “Satisfactory” in its most recent CRA evaluation.
Source of Strength Obligations
A bank holding company, such as us, is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its 
subsidiary bank. The term “source of financial strength” means the ability of a company, such as us, that directly or indirectly 
owns or controls an insured depository institution, such as Origin Bank, to provide financial assistance to such insured 
depository institution in the event of financial distress. The appropriate federal banking agency for the depository institution 
(in the case of Origin Bank, this agency is the Federal Reserve) may require reports from us to assess our ability to serve as a 
source of strength and to enforce compliance with the source of strength requirements by requiring us to provide financial 
assistance to Origin Bank in the event of financial distress. If we were to enter bankruptcy or become subject to the orderly 
liquidation process established by the Dodd-Frank Act, any commitment by us to a federal bank regulatory agency to 
maintain the capital of Origin Bank would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee or the FDIC, as appropriate, and entitled to a 
priority of payment. In addition, the FDIC provides that any insured depository institution generally will be liable for any loss 
incurred by the FDIC in connection with the default of, or any assistance provided by the FDIC to, a commonly controlled 
insured depository institution. Origin Bank is an FDIC-insured depository institution and thus subject to these requirements.
Acquisitions
The BHC Act permits acquisitions of banks by bank holding companies, such that we and any other bank holding 
company, whether located in Louisiana or elsewhere, may acquire a bank located in any other state, subject to certain deposit-
percentage, age of bank charter requirements, and other restrictions. The BHC Act requires that a bank holding company 
obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% 
of the voting shares of any additional bank or bank holding company, (ii) taking any action that causes an additional bank or 
bank holding company to become a subsidiary of the bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with any other 
bank holding company. The Federal Reserve may not approve any such transaction that would result in a monopoly or would 
be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any 
section of the United States, or the effect of which may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly 
in any section of the country, or that in any other manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anticompetitive effects of 
the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the 
convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider: (1) the financial and 
managerial resources of the companies involved, including pro forma capital ratios; (2) the risk to the stability of the United 
States banking or financial system; (3) the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including performance 
under the CRA; and (4) the effectiveness of the company in combatting money laundering.
Change in Control
Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company or a bank that a person, entity or group 
may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. Under the Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations 
thereunder, a person, entity or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank 
holding company, such as the Company, or before acquiring control of any FDIC-insured bank, such as Origin Bank. Upon 
receipt of such notice, the Federal Reserve may approve or disapprove the acquisition. The Change in Bank Control Act 
creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a person, entity or group acquires the power to vote 10% or more of our 
outstanding common stock. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company 
and a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, 
shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender 
offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other companies. Investors should be aware of these requirements when 
acquiring shares of our stock.
17

Governance and Financial Reporting Obligations
We are required to comply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. 
Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm, Forvis Mazars, LLP, is required to comply with rules 
established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) as they related to the completion of the audit of 
our consolidated financial statements. In particular, we are required to include management and independent registered public 
accounting firm reports on internal controls as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to comply with Section 404 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have evaluated our controls, including compliance with the SEC rules on internal controls, 
and have spent, and expect to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Our 
failure to comply with these internal control rules may materially adversely affect our reputation, ability to obtain the 
necessary certifications to financial statements, and the values of our securities. 
Volcker Rule
Section 13 of the BHC Act, commonly referred to as the “Volcker Rule,” generally prohibits banking organizations 
from (i) engaging in certain proprietary trading, and (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a 
“covered fund,” all subject to certain exceptions. The Volcker Rule also specifies certain limited activities in which banking 
organizations may continue to engage and requires us to maintain a compliance program. Banking organizations, such as us, 
with $10 billion or less in total consolidated assets and with total trading assets and liabilities of less than 5% of total 
consolidated assets are exempt from the Volcker Rule. At December 31, 2024, we had total consolidated assets of $9.68 
billion and our expectation is that we will exceed $10 billion in total consolidated assets during 2025.
Based on the Company’s current activities, we do not currently expect that the Volcker Rule will have a material 
effect on our businesses or revenue after exceeding $10 billion, although it may prevent us from engaging in certain new 
activities or increase the compliance cost of new activities.
Incentive Compensation
The Dodd-Frank Act required the federal banking agencies and the SEC to establish joint rules or guidelines for 
financial institutions with more than $1 billion in assets, such as us and Origin Bank, which prohibit incentive compensation 
arrangements that the agencies determine to encourage inappropriate risks by the institution. Proposed rules were issued in 
2011, 2016 and 2024, but as of December 31, 2024, these rules have not been implemented. For banks between $1 to $50 
billion, the proposed rules would prohibit certain types of incentive compensation that the agencies deem as encouraging 
inappropriate risks, require adherence to principles of balancing risk and reward, required effective risk management over 
incentive compensation and enhance oversight and recordkeeping. Further, the capital conservation buffer (described below 
under Capital Requirements) limits discretionary bonus payments to bank executives if the institution’s regulatory capital 
ratios failed to exceed certain thresholds. We and Origin Bank have undertaken efforts to ensure that our incentive 
compensation plans do not encourage inappropriate risks, consistent with three key principles - that incentive compensation 
arrangements should appropriately balance risk and financial rewards, be compatible with effective controls and risk 
management, and be supported by strong corporate governance.
Other Regulatory Matters
We and our subsidiaries are subject to oversight by the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange, and various state 
securities and insurance regulators. We and our subsidiaries have from time to time received requests for information from 
regulatory authorities in various states, including state attorneys general, securities regulators and other regulatory authorities, 
concerning our business practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business.
Capital Requirements
We and Origin Bank are required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels based on ratios of 
capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the Federal Reserve 
may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of 
capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from 
non-traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes 
in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks, are important factors that are to be taken into account in 
assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The following is a brief description of the relevant provisions of these 
capital rules and their potential impact on our capital levels.
18

We and Origin Bank are subject to the following risk-based capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) risk-
based capital ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, which includes CET1 and additional Tier 1 capital, and a total risk-based 
capital ratio, which includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. CET1 is primarily comprised of the sum of common stock instruments 
and related surplus net of treasury stock plus retained earnings less certain adjustments and deductions, including with respect 
to goodwill, intangible assets, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets subject to temporary timing differences. 
Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. Tier 2 capital consists of 
instruments disqualified from Tier 1 capital, including qualifying subordinated debt and a limited amount of credit loss 
reserves up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, subject to certain eligibility criteria. The capital rules also define 
the risk-weights assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-
based capital rules, including, for example, certain “high volatility” commercial real estate, past due assets, structured 
securities and equity holdings.
The leverage capital ratio, which serves as a minimum capital standard, is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly 
average total consolidated assets net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and certain required deduction items. The 
required minimum leverage ratio for all banks and bank holding companies is 4%.
In addition, effective January 1, 2019, the capital rules required a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%, comprised of 
CET1, above each of the minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements (CET1, Tier 1, and total capital), which is designed 
to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. These buffer requirements must be met for a bank or bank holding 
company to be able to pay dividends, engage in share buybacks or make discretionary bonus payments to executive 
management without restriction.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”), among other things, requires the federal 
bank regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” regarding depository institutions that do not meet minimum 
capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five regulatory capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, 
“undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”. A depository institution’s capital tier 
will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established 
by regulation. FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of 
a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be 
undercapitalized. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive restraints on operations, management and capital 
distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Undercapitalized depository institutions are 
subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions 
may not accept brokered deposits absent a waiver from the FDIC, are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit 
capital restoration plans for regulatory approval. A depository institution’s holding company must guarantee any required 
capital restoration plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes 
undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the institution fails to comply with the plan. Federal banking 
agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic 
assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution's capital. If a depository institution fails to submit 
an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. 
To be well-capitalized, Origin Bank must maintain at least the following capital ratios:
•
6.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
•
8.0% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets;
•
10.0% Total capital to risk-weighted assets; and
•
5.0% leverage ratio.
The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the 
higher capital requirements imposed under the current capital rules applicable to banks. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s 
Regulation Y, including determining whether a bank holding company meets the requirements to be a financial holding 
company, bank holding companies, such as the Company, must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater 
and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater to be well-capitalized. Also, the Federal Reserve may require bank 
holding companies, including the Company, to maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, 
depending upon general economic conditions and a bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth 
plans.
19

Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and 
possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our 
operations or financial condition. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could also result in restrictions on the 
Company’s or Origin Bank’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of 
applications or other restrictions on its growth.
Throughout and as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s and Origin Bank’s regulatory capital ratios were above 
the applicable well-capitalized standards and met the capital conservation buffer. Based on current estimates, we believe that 
the Company and Origin Bank will continue to exceed all applicable well-capitalized regulatory capital requirements and the 
capital conservation buffer in 2025. Please see Note 17 — Capital and Regulatory Matters in the notes to the consolidated 
financial statements for consolidated capital ratios of the Company and Origin Bank as of December 31, 2024.
Payment of Dividends
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from Origin Bank and our other subsidiaries. Under the laws of the State 
of Louisiana, we, as a business corporation, may declare and pay dividends in cash or property unless the payment or 
declaration would be contrary to restrictions contained in our Articles of Incorporation, or unless, after payment of the 
dividend, we would not be able to pay our debts when they become due in the usual course of our business or our total assets 
would be less than the sum of our total liabilities. In addition, we are also subject to federal regulatory capital requirements 
that effectively limit the amount of cash dividends that we may pay.
The primary sources of funds for our payment of dividends to our shareholders are cash on hand and dividends from 
Origin Bank and our non-bank subsidiaries. Various federal and state statutory provisions and regulations limit the amount of 
dividends that Origin Bank may pay. Origin Bank is subject to certain restrictions on dividends under federal and state laws, 
regulations and policies. In general, Origin Bank may pay dividends to us without the approval of the OFI so long as the 
amount of the dividend does not exceed the Bank’s net profits earned during the current year combined with its retained net 
profits of the immediately preceding year. The Bank is required to obtain the approval of the OFI for any amount in excess of 
this threshold. Additionally, to pay dividends to us, under Louisiana law Origin Bank must have unimpaired surplus that 
equals or exceeds fifty percent of its outstanding capital stock. Further, under federal law, Origin Bank may not pay any 
dividend to us if it is undercapitalized, or the payment of the dividend would cause it to become undercapitalized. 
In addition, we and Origin Bank are subject to various general regulatory policies and requirements relating to the 
payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The Federal Reserve 
has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound 
banking practice. The Federal Reserve has indicated that depository institutions and their holding companies should generally 
pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.
Under a Federal Reserve policy adopted in 2009 and revised in 2020, the board of directors of a bank holding 
company must consider different factors to ensure that its dividend level is prudent relative to maintaining a strong financial 
position, and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios, such as potential events that could affect its ability to pay, 
while still maintaining a strong financial position. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of 
directors of a bank holding company should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the 
bank holding company’s dividends if:
•
its net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that 
period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends;
•
its prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with its capital needs and overall current and prospective 
financial condition; or
•
it will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.
20

Regulation of the Bank
Origin Bank, which is a member of the Federal Reserve System, is subject to comprehensive supervision and 
regulation by the Federal Reserve, and is subject to its regulatory reporting requirements, as well as supervision and 
regulation by the OFI. As a member bank of the Federal Reserve System, Origin Bank is required to hold stock in its district 
Federal Reserve Bank in an amount equal to 6% of its capital stock and surplus (half paid to acquire stock with the remainder 
held as a cash reserve). Member banks do not have any control over the Federal Reserve System as a result of owning the 
stock and the stock cannot be sold or traded. As of January 27, 2025, the annual dividend rate for member banks with 
$12.841 billion or less in total assets is fixed at 6%, which currently applies to us. However, the annual dividend rate for 
member banks with total assets in excess of $12.841 billion, is based on a floating dividend rate tied to 10-year U.S. 
Treasuries with the maximum dividend rate capped at 6%.
The deposits of Origin Bank are insured by the FDIC up to applicable limits, and, accordingly, Origin Bank is also 
subject to certain FDIC regulations and the FDIC has backup examination authority and some enforcement powers over 
Origin Bank. In addition, as discussed in more detail below, Origin Bank and any other of our subsidiaries that offer 
consumer financial products and services are subject to regulation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). 
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are stricter than those 
regulations promulgated by the CFPB, and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce certain federal consumer financial 
protection law.
Broadly, regulations applicable to Origin Bank include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to its directors, 
officers and employees; restrictions on the opening and closing of branch offices; the maintenance of required capital ratios; 
the granting of credit under equal and fair conditions; the disclosure of the costs and terms of such credit; requirements to 
maintain reserves against deposits and loans; limitations on the types of investment that may be made by Origin Bank; and 
requirements governing risk management practices. Subject to Federal Reserve approval and certain state filing requirements, 
Origin Bank is permitted under federal law to branch on a de novo basis across state lines wherever the laws of that state 
would permit a bank chartered by that state to establish a branch.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
Origin Bank is subject to restrictions on extensions of credit and certain other transactions between Origin Bank and 
the Company or any nonbank affiliate. Generally, these covered transactions with either the Company or any affiliate are 
limited to 10% of Origin Bank’s capital and surplus, and all such transactions between Origin Bank and the Company and all 
of its nonbank affiliates combined are limited to 20% of Origin Bank’s capital and surplus. Loans and other extensions of 
credit from Origin Bank to the Company or any affiliate generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified 
amounts. In addition, any transaction between Origin Bank and the Company or any affiliate are required to be on an arm’s 
length basis. Federal banking laws also place similar restrictions on certain extensions of credit by insured banks, such as 
Origin Bank, to their directors, executive officers and principal shareholders.
FDIC Insurance Assessments and Depositor Preference
Origin Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC’s DIF up to the limits under applicable law, which currently are set 
at $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. Origin Bank is subject to FDIC 
assessments for its deposit insurance. The FDIC calculates quarterly deposit insurance assessments based on an institution’s 
average total consolidated assets less its average tangible equity, and determines the applicable rate based upon a range of 
factors, including certain additional factors for institutions in excess of $10 billion assets. The assessment rate schedule can 
change from time to time, at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits. 
As of June 30, 2020, the DIF reserve ratio fell to 1.30%, below the statutory minimum of 1.35%. The FDIC, as 
required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, established a plan on September 15, 2020 to restore the DIF reserve ratio 
to meet or exceed the statutory minimum of 1.35% within eight years. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted an amended 
restoration plan to increase the likelihood that the reserve ratio would be restored to at least 1.35 percent by September 30, 
2028. The FDIC’s amended restoration plan increases the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly 
by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC could further increase the deposit 
insurance assessments for certain insured depository institutions, including Origin Bank, if the DIF reserve ratio is not 
restored as projected.
21

In November 2023, the FDIC approved a final rule to implement a special assessment to recover the loss to the DIF 
associated with several bank failures that occurred during early 2023. The assessment base for the special assessment is equal 
to estimated uninsured deposits reported as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude the first $5 billion, to be collected at 
an annual rate of approximately 13.4 basis points for an anticipated total of eight quarterly assessment periods, beginning the 
first quarterly assessment period of 2024. At December 31, 2022, our estimated uninsured deposits were below the threshold 
for assessment.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and 
unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, 
rule, order or condition imposed by a bank’s federal regulatory agency. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 
provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors 
of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative 
expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution, including 
those of the parent bank holding company. 
Standards for Safety and Soundness
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation or 
guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to: (1) internal controls; (2) 
information systems and audit systems; (3) loan documentation; (4) credit underwriting; (5) interest rate risk exposure; and 
(6) asset quality. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards 
for Safety and Soundness to implement these required standards. These guidelines set forth the safety and soundness 
standards used to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. Under the 
regulations, if a regulator determines that a bank fails to meet any standards prescribed by the guidelines, the regulator may 
require the Bank to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance, consistent with deadlines for the submission and review 
of such safety and soundness compliance plans.
Anti-Money Laundering
A continued focus of governmental policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been combating 
money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act broadened the application of anti-money laundering 
regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions such as broker-dealers, investment advisors and insurance 
companies, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. Government to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money 
laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act require that 
regulated financial institutions, including state member banks: (i) establish an anti-money laundering program that includes 
training and audit components; (ii) comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to 
open an account; (iii) take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and (iv) perform certain 
verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. Failure of a 
financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational 
consequences for the institution. Origin Bank has augmented its systems and procedures to meet the requirements of these 
regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by law. 
The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) has adopted rules that require financial institutions 
to obtain beneficial ownership information with respect to legal entities with which such institutions conduct business, 
subject to certain exclusions and exemptions. Bank regulators are focusing their examinations on anti-money laundering 
compliance, and we continue to monitor and augment, where necessary, our anti-money laundering compliance programs. 
Banking regulators will consider compliance with the Act’s money laundering provisions in acting upon merger and 
acquisition proposals. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and have been 
active in imposing cease and desist and other regulatory orders and money penalty sanctions against institutions found to be 
violating these obligations. Sanctions for violations of the Act can be imposed in an amount equal to twice the sum involved 
in the violating transaction, up to $1 million. On January 1, 2021, Congress passed federal legislation that made sweeping 
changes to federal anti-money laundering laws, including changes that will be implemented in subsequent years. On June 30, 
2021, FinCEN published the first set of “national Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) priorities,” as required by the Bank 
Secrecy Act, which include, but are not limited to, cybercrime, terrorist financing, fraud, and drug/human trafficking. 
FinCEN is required to implement regulations to specify how covered financial institutions, such as the Company, should 
incorporate these national priorities into their AML programs.  
22

Economic Sanctions
The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) is responsible for helping to ensure that U.S. entities do not engage 
in transactions with certain prohibited parties, as defined by various Executive Orders and acts of Congress. OFAC publishes, 
and routinely updates, lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts, 
including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. If we find a name on any transaction, account or wire 
transfer that is on an OFAC list, we must undertake certain specified activities, which could include blocking or freezing the 
account or transaction requested, and we must notify the appropriate authorities.
Concentrations in Lending
During 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate 
Lending” (the “Guidance”) and advised financial institutions of the risks posed by commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending 
concentrations. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated 
with real estate lending concentrations. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be required. The 
Guidance is triggered when CRE loan concentrations exceed either:
•
Total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land of 100% or more of a bank’s total risk-based 
capital; or
•
Total reported loans secured by multifamily and nonowner-occupied, nonfarm nonresidential properties and loans 
for construction, land development, and other land (excluding loans secured by farmland) of 300% or more of a 
bank’s total risk-based capital.
The Guidance also applies when a bank has a sharp increase in CRE loans or has significant concentrations of CRE 
secured by a particular property type. We have always had exposures to loans secured by CRE due to the nature of our 
markets and the loan needs of both consumer and commercial clients. We believe our long-term experience in CRE lending, 
underwriting policies, internal controls, and other policies currently in place, as well as our loan and credit monitoring and 
administration procedures, are generally appropriate to managing our concentrations as required under the Guidance. As of 
December 31, 2024, our CRE loan concentrations were below the Guidance thresholds discussed above.
Debit Interchange Fees
Debit card interchange fee restrictions set forth in the Durbin Amendment, as implemented by regulations of the 
Federal Reserve, cap the maximum debit interchange fee that a debit card issuer may receive per transaction. The maximum 
permissible interchange fee that a non-exempt issuer may receive for an electronic debit transaction is the sum of 21 cents per 
transaction and 5 bps multiplied by the value of the transaction, subject to an upward adjustment of 1 cent if an issuer 
certifies that it has implemented policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve the fraud-prevention standards set 
forth by the Federal Reserve. In addition, card issuers and networks are prohibited from entering into arrangements requiring 
that debit card transactions be processed on a single network or only two affiliated networks and allows merchants to 
determine transaction routing.
Debit card issuers with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion are exempt from these interchange fee 
restrictions. The exemption for small issuers ceases to apply as of July 1 of the year following the calendar year in which the 
debit card issuer has total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more at calendar year end. 
On October 25, 2023, the Federal Reserve proposed to lower the maximum interchange fee that a non-exempt issuer 
can receive for a debit card transaction. The proposal would also establish a regular process for updating the maximum 
amount every other year going forward. The Federal Reserve extended the comment period for its proposed changes to its 
debit card interchange fee rule until May 12, 2024, and at December 31, 2024, the proposal is still under review. At 
December 31, 2024, we had total consolidated assets of $9.68 billion and our expectation is that we will exceed $10 billion in 
total consolidated assets during 2025. Any reduction in interchange income as a result of the loss of the exemption for small 
issuers under the Durbin Amendment could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results 
of operations beginning in the second half of 2026.
23

Community Reinvestment Act
Origin Bank is subject to the provisions of the CRA, which imposes a continuing and affirmative obligation, 
consistent with safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of entire communities where the bank accepts 
deposits, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Federal Reserve’s assessment of Origin Bank’s CRA 
record is made available to the public. CRA agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual CRA reports must 
be made to the Federal Reserve. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become or remain a financial holding 
company and no new activities authorized under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB”) may be commenced by a holding 
company or by a bank financial subsidiary if any of its bank subsidiaries received less than a “satisfactory” CRA rating in its 
latest CRA examination. Federal CRA regulations require, among other things, that evidence of discrimination against 
applicants on a prohibited basis, and illegal or abusive lending practices be considered in the CRA evaluation. Origin Bank 
has a rating of “Satisfactory” in its most recent CRA evaluation. 
On October 24, 2023, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), Federal Reserve, and FDIC issued a 
final rule to modernize their respective CRA regulations. The revised rules substantially alter the methodology for assessing 
compliance with the CRA, with material aspects taking effect January 1, 2026, and revised data reporting requirements taking 
effect January 1, 2027. Among other things, the revised rules evaluate lending outside traditional assessment areas generated 
by the growth of non-branch delivery systems, such as online and mobile banking, apply a metrics-based benchmarking 
approach to assessment, and clarify eligible CRA activities. The final rules are likely to make it more challenging and/or 
costly for the Bank to receive a rating of at least “satisfactory” on its CRA exam.
Privacy, Credit Reporting, and Data Security 
The GLB generally prohibits disclosure of non-public consumer information to non-affiliated third parties unless the 
consumer has been given the opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further 
required to disclose their privacy policies to clients annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with 
state law if it is more protective of consumer privacy than the GLB. The GLB also directed federal regulators to prescribe 
standards for the security of consumer information. Origin Bank is subject to such standards, as well as standards for 
notifying clients in the event of a security breach. Origin Bank utilizes credit bureau data in underwriting activities. Use of 
such data is regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V on a uniform, nationwide basis, including credit 
reporting, prescreening, and sharing of information between affiliates and the use of credit data. The Fair and Accurate Credit 
Transactions Act, which amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act, permits states to enact identity theft laws that are not 
inconsistent with the conduct required by the provisions of that Act. Clients must be notified when unauthorized disclosure 
involves sensitive client information that may be misused. The Bank is also required to notify the Federal Reserve within 36 
hours of a “computer-security incident” that rises to the level of a “notification incident.” 
The federal banking regulators regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk 
management standards among financial institutions. As a result, financial institutions, like the Company and Origin Bank, are 
expected to establish multiple lines of defense and to ensure their risk management processes address the risk posed by 
potential threats to the institution. A financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient processes to 
effectively respond and recover the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack. A financial institution is also expected to 
develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations if a critical service provider of the 
institution falls victim to this type of cyber-attack. Our information security protocols are designed in part to adhere to the 
requirements of this guidance.
State regulators have also been increasingly active in implementing privacy and cybersecurity standards and 
regulations. Recently, several states have adopted regulations requiring certain financial institutions to implement 
cybersecurity programs and providing detailed requirements with respect to these programs, including data encryption 
requirements. Many states have also recently implemented or modified their data breach notification and data privacy 
requirements. We expect this trend of state-level activity in those areas to continue and are continually monitoring 
developments in the states in which our clients are located.
24

Anti-Tying Restrictions
In general, a bank may not extend credit, lease, sell property, or furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration 
for them on the condition that (1) the client obtain or provide some additional credit, property, or services from or to the bank 
or bank holding company or their subsidiaries or (2) the client not obtain some other credit, property, or services from a 
competitor, except to the extent reasonable conditions are imposed to assure the soundness of the credit extended. A bank 
may, however, offer combined-balance products and may otherwise offer more favorable terms if a client obtains two or 
more traditional bank products. The law also expressly permits banks to engage in other forms of tying and authorizes the 
Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) to grant additional exceptions by regulation or order. Also, certain foreign transactions are 
exempt from the general rule.
Consumer Regulation
Activities of Origin Bank are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. These 
laws and regulations include, among numerous other things, provisions that:
•
limit the interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Origin Bank, including rules respecting the terms 
of credit cards and of debit card overdrafts;
•
govern Origin Bank’s disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
•
require Origin Bank to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether it is 
fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the communities it serves;
•
prohibit Origin Bank from discriminating on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors when it makes 
decisions to extend credit;
•
govern the manner in which Origin Bank may collect consumer debts; and
•
prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in the provision of consumer financial products and services.
In addition, on December 12, 2024, the CFPB issued a final rule that caps overdraft fees at (i) $5 per transaction, or 
(ii) an amount per transaction calculated to cover specific costs and losses relating to overdrafts. The final rule is scheduled to 
take effect on October 1, 2025, and is applicable to banks with more than $10 billion in assets. At December 31, 2024, we 
had total consolidated assets of $9.68 billion and our expectation is that we will exceed $10 billion in total consolidated assets 
during 2025. At this time, there is still some uncertainty surrounding this rule’s ultimate disposition and the timing of its 
effectiveness on Origin.
Mortgage Regulation
The CFPB adopted a rule that implements the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage provisions of the Dodd-Frank 
Act (the “ATR/QM rule”), which requires lenders to consider, among other things, income, employment status, assets, 
payment amounts, and credit history before approving a mortgage, and provides a compliance “safe harbor” for lenders that 
issue certain “qualified mortgages.” The ATR/QM rule defines a “qualified mortgage” to have certain specified 
characteristics, and generally prohibits loans with negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms 
exceeding 30 years from being qualified mortgages. The rule also establishes general underwriting criteria for qualified 
mortgages, including that monthly payments be calculated based on the highest payment that will apply in the first five years 
of the loan and that the borrower have a total debt-to-income ratio that is less than or equal to 43%. While “qualified 
mortgages” will generally be afforded safe harbor status, a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay 
requirements will attach to “qualified mortgages” that are “higher priced mortgages” (which are generally subprime loans).
The CFPB has also issued rules to implement requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act pertaining to mortgage loan 
origination (including with respect to loan originator compensation and loan originator qualifications) as well as integrated 
mortgage disclosure rules. In addition, the CFPB has issued rules that require servicers to comply with certain standards and 
practices with regard to: error correction; information disclosure; force-placement of insurance; information management 
policies and procedures; requiring information about mortgage loss mitigation options be provided to delinquent borrowers; 
providing delinquent borrowers access to servicer personnel with continuity of contact about the borrower’s mortgage loan 
account; and evaluating borrowers’ applications for available loss mitigation options. These rules also address initial rate 
adjustment notices for adjustable-rate mortgages, periodic statements for residential mortgage loans, and prompt crediting of 
mortgage payments and response to requests for payoff amounts.
25

Non-Discrimination Policies
Origin Bank is also subject to, among other things, the provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) 
and the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), both of which prohibit discrimination based on race or color, religion, national origin, 
sex, and familial status in any aspect of a consumer or commercial credit or residential real estate transaction. The 
Department of Justice and the federal bank regulatory agencies have issued an Interagency Policy Statement on 
Discrimination in Lending that provides guidance to financial institutions in determining whether discrimination exists, how 
the agencies will respond to lending discrimination, and what steps lenders might take to prevent discriminatory lending 
practices. The Department of Justice has increased its efforts to prosecute what it regards as violations of the ECOA and the 
FHA.
Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies. 
The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also by U.S. fiscal policy 
and the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. Some of the instruments of monetary policy available to the Federal 
Reserve include changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, the fluctuating availability of borrowings at the 
“discount window” and open market operations as directed by the Federal Open Market Committee. These policies influence, 
to a significant extent, the overall growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits and the interest rates charged on loans or 
paid on deposits. We cannot predict the nature of future fiscal and monetary policies or the effect of these policies on our 
operations and activities, financial condition, results of operations, growth plans or future prospects.
LIBOR 
On March 15, 2022, Congress enacted the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act (the “LIBOR Act”) to address 
references to LIBOR in contracts that (i) are governed by U.S. law; (ii) did not mature before June 30, 2023; and (iii) lack 
fallback provisions providing for a clearly defined and practicable replacement for LIBOR. On December 16, 2022, the 
Federal Reserve adopted a final rule to implement the LIBOR Act by identifying benchmark rates based on SOFR (Secured 
Overnight Financing Rate) that will replace LIBOR in certain financial contracts after June 30, 2023. The final rule identifies 
replacement benchmark rates based on SOFR to replace overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month, and 12-month 
LIBOR in contracts subject to the LIBOR Act. The Company and the Bank fully transitioned its LIBOR-based contracts to 
other indices, primarily SOFR, as of December 31, 2023.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. 
Origin Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, which is one of the 11 regional Federal Home 
Loan Banks composing the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The Federal Home Loan Banks make loans to their member 
banks in accordance with policies and procedures established by the Federal Home Loan Bank system and the boards of 
directors of each regional Federal Home Loan Bank. Any advances from a Federal Home Loan Bank must be secured by 
specified types of collateral, and all long-term advances may be obtained only for the purpose of providing funds for 
residential housing finance. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, Origin Bank is required to acquire and 
hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit 
made by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas to Origin Bank are secured by a portion of Origin Bank’s mortgage loan 
portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas held by Origin Bank.
Item 1A. 
Risk Factors
We face many risks and uncertainties, any one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on our 
business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects or the value of, or return on, an investment in our common 
stock. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information included and incorporated 
by reference in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes contained in Item 8 of this 
report. We believe the risks described below are material to us as of the date of this report, but these risks are not the only 
risks that we face. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could also be affected by additional 
risks that apply to all financial services companies or companies operating in the United States and our specific geographic 
markets, as well as other risks that are not currently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our 
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, results of 
operations, financial condition and prospects could be adversely affected. Further, to the extent that any of the information in 
this report constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors below also are cautionary statements identifying important 
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by 
us or on our behalf.
26

Summary
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business 
objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. These 
risks are discussed more fully after the summary, and risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
Current uncertain economic conditions (both domestic and international) pose challenges, and could adversely affect 
our business, financial condition and results of operations;
•
Changes in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition including 
decreased net interest margin, impact on loan demand, competition for, and increased cost of funding, deposits, and 
the value of our securities portfolio (including any losses recognized);
•
We are subject to risks related to inflation, rising prices and the government and Federal Reserve response to the 
same;
•
The failure to maintain an effective system of controls and procedures, including internal control over financial and 
non-financial reporting;
•
We may not be able to adequately measure and limit our credit risk;
•
Our allowance for loan credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio and 
our earnings could decrease;
•
Negative changes in the economy affecting real estate values and liquidity could impair the value of collateral 
securing certain of our loans;
•
The deterioration in value of receivables, inventory, equipment or other commercial collateral could expose us to 
credit losses;
•
The geographic concentration of our markets in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and the Florida 
Panhandle makes us more sensitive than our more geographically diversified competitors to adverse changes in the 
local economy;
•
Our loan portfolio contains a number of large loans to certain borrowers, and deterioration in the financial condition 
of these borrowers could have a significant adverse impact on our asset quality;
•
The loss of executive management or other key employees, as well as our ability to attract and retain profitable 
bankers, could adversely impact our business or reputation;
•
Fraud, unauthorized access, cyber-crime and other threats to data security has impacted and may cause harm to our 
business, additionally, the impact of fraud or misconduct by internal or external parties which we may not be able to 
prevent, detect or mitigate;
•
We may have exposure to tax liabilities that are larger than we anticipate;
•
The small to medium-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business 
developments, which may impair our borrowers’ ability to repay loans;
•
We face significant competition to attract and retain customers, which could impair our growth, decrease our 
profitability or result in loss of market share;
•
Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business;
•
Risks related to ESG strategies and initiatives, the scope and pace of which could alter our reputation and 
shareholder, associate, customer and third-party affiliations;
•
Our business has grown rapidly, and we may not be able to maintain our historical rate of growth, which could have 
an adverse effect on our ability to successfully implement our business strategy;
27

•
We may pursue acquisitions or new lines of business in the future, which could expose us to financial, execution and 
operational risks;
•
We are susceptible to environmental risks, such as hurricanes and other natural disasters, adverse weather and 
climate change effects;
•
We have a continuing need for technological change, and we may not have the resources to effectively implement 
new technology, or we may experience operational challenges when implementing new technology;
•
The rapid advancement and integration of artificial intelligence in financial services present risks related to data 
security, regulatory compliance, algorithmic biases, and operational reliability, which could impact our business, 
reputation, and regulatory obligations;
•
The effectiveness of derivative financial instruments and hedging activities to manage risks;
•
We are subject to various liquidity risks, credit, and market risks;
•
Risks related to the extensive use, reliability, disruption, and accuracy of the models and data we rely on;
•
Our ability to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting;
•
Our reliance on third parties to provide key components of our business infrastructure;
•
Risks related to potential claims, damages, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future 
litigation, regulatory proceedings and enforcement actions;
•
We operate in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern our operations, including 
accounting policies, standards, and interpretations, could subject us to regulatory consequences;
•
We are subject to stringent capital requirements, which may result in lower returns on equity, require us to raise 
additional capital, limit growth opportunities or result in regulatory restrictions;
•
The market price of our common stock may be subject to substantial fluctuations and is subject to risk of loss; and
•
Other factors and risks described under “Risk Factors” herein and in any of our subsequent reports filed with the 
SEC and available on our website at www.sec.gov.
Risks Related to Our Business
Current uncertain economic conditions pose challenges, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and 
results of operations.
We are operating in an uncertain economic environment. Our business and operations, which primarily consist of 
lending money to customers in the form of loans, borrowing money from customers in the form of deposits and investing in 
securities, are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the U.S. Economic uncertainty and an inflationary, 
recessionary or stagnant economy could result in financial stress on our borrowers, which could adversely affect our business, 
financial condition and results of operations. Deteriorating conditions in the regional economies we serve, or in certain 
sectors of those economies, could drive losses beyond that which is provided for in our allowance for credit losses. We could 
also face the following risks in connection with the following events:
•
inflationary pressures remained elevated throughout 2023 and 2024, and may to continue into 2025;
•
market developments, economic stagnation or slowdowns, and tariffs are expected to affect consumer confidence 
levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, resulting in increased delinquencies and default rates on 
loans and other credit facilities;
•
the processes we use to estimate the allowance for credit losses and other reserves may prove to be unreliable. Such 
estimates rely upon complex modeling inputs and judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions, which 
may be rendered inaccurate and/or no longer subject to accurate forecasting;
28

•
our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our borrowers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to 
select, manage, and underwrite loans become less predictive of future charge-offs;
•
regulatory scrutiny of the industry has increased and could continue to increase, leading to increased regulation of 
the industry that could lead to a higher cost of compliance, limit our ability to pursue business opportunities and 
increase our exposure to litigation or fines;
•
monetary policy or other market conditions could cause rapid changes in interest rates and asset values that would 
have a materially adverse impact on our profitability and overall financial condition;
•
increased taxes would limit our ability to pursue growth and return profits to shareholders; and
•
erosion in the fiscal condition of the U.S. Treasury, the U.S. government’s decisions regarding its debt ceiling and 
the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations may cause further interest rate increases, disrupt 
access to capital markets, result in new taxes and trigger recessionary conditions.
If these conditions or similar ones continue to exist or worsen, we could experience adverse effects on our financial 
condition. 
Changes in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. 
Significant increases in market interest rates on loans, or the perception that an increase may occur, could adversely 
affect both our ability to originate new loans and our ability to grow. In response to growing signs of inflation, the Federal 
Reserve rapidly increased interest rates during 2022 and 2023 and took further actions to mitigate inflationary pressures. 
These interest rate changes had a number of negative effects on our business, including reducing the value of our securities 
portfolio, increasing our interest rate expense, and decreasing demand for new loans, particularly residential mortgages. 
Future rapid changes in interest rates, in either direction, may make it difficult for us to balance our loan and deposit 
portfolios, which may adversely affect our results of operations by, for example, reducing asset yields or spreads, or having 
other adverse impacts on our business. Decreases in interest rates could result in an acceleration of loan prepayments. 
Continued increased market interest rates could also adversely affect the ability of our floating-rate borrowers to meet their 
higher payment obligations. If this occurred, it could cause an increase in nonperforming assets and charge offs, which could 
adversely affect our business.
Further, our earnings and financial condition are dependent to a large degree upon net interest income, which is the 
difference or spread, between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. When 
market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities may fluctuate. 
This can cause decreases in our spread and can adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors including: 
•
The rate of inflation;
•
Economic conditions;
•
Federal monetary policies; and
•
Stability of domestic and foreign markets.
Changes in interest rates can increase or decrease our net interest income, because different types of assets and 
liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to market interest rate changes. When interest-bearing liabilities 
mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater degree than interest-earning assets in the same period, an increase in interest 
rates could reduce net interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater 
degree than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income. Changes in market values of 
investment securities classified as available for sale are impacted by higher rates and can negatively impact our other 
comprehensive (loss) income and equity levels through accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, which includes net 
unrealized gains and losses on those securities. Further, such losses could be realized into earnings should liquidity and/or 
business strategy necessitate the sales of securities in a loss position.
29

Additionally, further increases in interest rates may, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and our ability 
to originate loans and decrease loan repayment rates. A decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect us through, 
among other things, increased prepayments on our loan portfolio and increased competition for deposits. Accordingly, 
changes in the level of market interest rates affect our net yield on interest-earning assets, loan origination volume, loan 
portfolio and our overall results. Moreover, although we have implemented practices, we believe will reduce the potential 
effects of changes in interest rates on our net interest income, these practices may not always be successful. Accordingly, 
changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect our net interest income and our net interest 
margin, asset quality, loan and lease origination volume, liquidity, and overall profitability. We cannot assure you that we can 
minimize our interest rate risk.
In addition, we originate residential mortgage loans for sale and for our portfolio. The origination of residential 
mortgage loans is highly dependent on the local real estate market and the level of interest rates. Increasing interest rates tend 
to reduce the origination of loans for sale and fee income, which we report as gain on sale of loans. Decreasing interest rates 
generally result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, as borrowers refinance their debt in order 
to reduce their borrowing cost. This typically leads to reinvestment at lower rates than the loans or securities were paying. 
Changes in market interest rates could also reduce the value of our financial assets. Our financial condition and results of 
operations could be adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in managing the effects of changes in interest rates.
Inflationary pressures and rising prices may affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Inflation rose over the last several years to levels not seen for over 40 years. Inflationary pressures may continue into 
2025. Inflation could lead to increased costs to our customers, making it more difficult for them to repay their loans or other 
obligations increasing our credit risk. While the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates in late 2024, current interest rates 
remain significantly higher than interest rates as of early 2022. A deterioration in economic conditions in the United States 
and our markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral 
values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, all of which, in turn, would adversely affect our business, 
financial condition and results of operations.
Changes to monetary policy by the Federal Reserve could adversely impact our results of operations.
The Federal Reserve is responsible for regulating the supply of money in the United States, including open market 
operations used to stabilize prices in times of economic stress, as well as setting monetary policies. These activities strongly 
influence our rate of return on certain investments, our mortgage origination pipeline, as well as our costs of funds for lending 
and investing, all of which may adversely impact our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and capital position.
Unstable global economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition, and 
operations.
The global credit and financial markets have from time to time experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, 
including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic 
growth, increases in unemployment rates, high rates of inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability. The financial 
markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, 
including the ongoing wars in the Ukraine and the Middle East, which have increased volatility in commodity and energy 
prices, created supply chain issues and caused instability in financial markets, all of which may continue or worsen in the 
future. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflicts could further adversely 
impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others 
could exacerbate market and economic instability. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in markets and 
confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such 
economic downturn, volatile business environment, hostile third-party action or continued unpredictable and unstable market 
conditions.
30

We may not be able to adequately measure and limit our credit risk, which could lead to unexpected losses.
Our business depends on our ability to successfully measure and manage credit risk. As a lender, we are exposed to 
the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be repaid timely or at all or that the value of any collateral 
supporting a loan will be insufficient to cover our outstanding exposure. In addition, we are exposed to risks with respect to 
the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes 
in economic and industry conditions, and risks inherent in dealing with individual loans and borrowers. The creditworthiness 
of a borrower is affected by many factors, including local market conditions and general economic conditions. If the overall 
economic climate in the United States, generally, or our market areas, specifically, experiences material disruption, our 
borrowers may experience difficulties in repaying their loans, the collateral we hold may decrease in value or become 
illiquid, and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require significant additional 
provisions for credit losses. Additional factors related to the credit quality of commercial loans include the quality of the 
management of the business and the borrower’s ability both to properly evaluate changes in the supply and demand 
characteristics affecting our market for products and services and to effectively respond to those changes. Additional factors 
related to the credit quality of commercial real estate loans include tenant vacancy rates and the quality of management of the 
property.
Our risk management practices, such as monitoring the concentration of our loans within specific industries and our 
credit approval, review and administrative practices may not adequately reduce credit risk, and our credit administration 
personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting 
customers and the quality of the loan portfolio. A failure to effectively measure and limit the credit risk associated with our 
loan portfolio may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs, and may necessitate that we significantly 
increase our allowance for credit losses, each of which could adversely affect our net income. As a result, our inability to 
successfully manage credit risk could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our allowance for loan credit losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio and our 
earnings could decrease.
Our experience in the banking industry indicates that some portion of our loans will not be fully repaid in a timely 
manner or at all. Accordingly, we maintain an allowance for loan credit losses that represents management’s judgment of 
expected losses and risks inherent in our loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing 
evaluation of general economic conditions, diversification and seasoning of the loan portfolio, historic loss experience, 
identified credit problems, delinquency levels and adequacy of collateral. The determination of the appropriate level of the 
allowance for loan credit losses is inherently highly subjective and requires us to make significant estimates of and 
assumptions regarding current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Inaccurate 
management assumptions, deterioration of economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing 
loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require us to 
increase our allowance for loan credit losses and additional expenses may be incurred. At any time, we are likely to have 
loans in our portfolio that will result in losses but that have not been identified as nonperforming or potential problem credits. 
We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify deteriorating credits before they become nonperforming assets or that we 
will be able to limit or correctly estimate losses on those loans that are identified. In addition, our regulators, as an integral 
part of their periodic examination, review the adequacy of our allowance for loan credit losses and may direct us to make 
additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. 
Changes in economic conditions or individual business or personal circumstances affecting borrowers, new information 
regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, 
may require an increase in the allowance. Further, if actual charge-offs in future periods exceed our estimation of charge-offs, 
we may need additional provision for loan credit losses to restore the adequacy of our allowance for loan credit losses. If we 
are required to materially increase our level of allowance for loan credit losses for any reason, such increases could have an 
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
31

Because a significant portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of real estate loans, negative changes in the economy 
affecting real estate values and liquidity could impair the value of collateral securing certain of our loans and result in 
loan and other losses.
Real estate values in our markets have experienced periods of fluctuation over the last several years, and the market 
value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time. At December 31, 2024, $5.20 billion, or 68.6%, of our 
total LHFI was comprised of loans with real estate as a primary component of collateral. We also make loans secured by real 
estate as a supplemental source of collateral. Adverse changes affecting real estate values and the liquidity of real estate in 
one or more of our markets could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio and could result in losses that 
adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operation. Negative changes in the economy affecting real 
estate values and liquidity in our market areas could significantly impair the value of property pledged as collateral on loans 
and affect our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure without a loss or additional losses. Collateral may have to be sold 
for less than the outstanding balance of the loan, which could result in losses on such loans. Such declines and losses could 
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If real estate values decline, it is also 
more likely that we would be required to increase our allowance for loan credit losses, which could have an adverse effect on 
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The geographic concentration of our markets in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and most recently into Alabama and 
Florida makes us more sensitive than our more geographically diversified competitors to adverse changes in the local 
economy.
Unlike larger financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, we are a regional bank concentrated in 
the Interstate 20 corridor between the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area, East Texas, North Louisiana and Jackson, 
Mississippi, as well as in Houston, Texas and Oxford, Mississippi. Recently, we expanded our presence into Mobile, 
Alabama and Fort Walton Beach, Florida. At December 31, 2024, 69.2% of our total loans (by dollar amount), excluding 
mortgage warehouse lines of credit, were made to borrowers who reside or conduct business in Texas, 18.4% attributable to 
Louisiana and 7.1% attributable, in total, to Mississippi, Mobile, Alabama and Fort Walton Beach, Florida and majority of 
our real estate loans are secured by properties located in these states. A deterioration in local economic conditions or in the 
residential or commercial real estate markets could have an adverse effect on the quality of our portfolio, the demand for our 
products and services, the ability of borrowers to timely repay loans, and the value of the collateral securing loans. If the 
population, employment or income growth in one of our markets is negative or slower than projected, income levels, deposits 
and real estate development could be adversely impacted. Some of our larger competitors that are more geographically 
diverse may be better able to manage and mitigate risks posed by adverse conditions impacting only local or regional 
markets.
Our commercial real estate loan portfolio exposes us to risks that may be greater than the risks related to our other 
mortgage loans.
Our loan portfolio includes non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans for individuals and businesses for 
various purposes, which are secured by commercial properties. At December 31, 2024, our non-owner-occupied commercial 
real estate loans totaled $1.50 billion, or 19.8%, of our total loan portfolio. These loans typically involve repayment 
dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property securing the loan in amounts sufficient to 
cover operating expenses and debt service, which may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local market 
conditions. These loans expose us to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral 
securing these loans typically cannot be liquidated as easily as residential real estate because there are fewer potential 
purchasers of the collateral. Additionally, non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans generally involve relatively large 
balances to single borrowers or related groups of borrowers. Accordingly, charge-offs on non-owner-occupied commercial 
real estate loans may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios. 
Unexpected deterioration in the credit quality of our commercial real estate loan portfolio would require us to increase our 
provision for loan credit losses, which would reduce our profitability, and could materially adversely affect our business, 
financial condition and results of operations.
32

A large portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial loans secured by receivables, inventory, equipment or 
other commercial collateral, the deterioration in value of which could expose us to credit losses.
At December 31, 2024, approximately $2.00 billion, or 26.4%, of our total loans were commercial and industrial 
loans to businesses. In general, these loans are collateralized by general business assets, including, among other things, 
accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and many are backed by a personal guaranty of the borrower or principal. 
These commercial loans are typically larger in amount than loans to individuals and, therefore, have the potential for larger 
losses on a single loan basis. Additionally, the repayment of commercial loans is subject to the ongoing business operations 
of the borrower. The collateral securing such loans generally includes movable property, such as equipment and inventory, 
which may decline in value more rapidly than we anticipate, exposing us to increased credit risk. In addition, a portion of our 
customer base, including customers in the energy and real estate business, may be exposed to volatile businesses or industries 
which are sensitive to commodity prices or market fluctuations, such as energy prices. Accordingly, negative changes in 
commodity prices and real estate values and liquidity could impair the value of the collateral securing these loans. Significant 
adverse changes in the economy or local market conditions in which our commercial lending customers operate could cause 
rapid declines in loan collectability and the values associated with general business assets resulting in inadequate collateral 
coverage that may expose us to credit losses and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of 
operations.
Our loan portfolio contains a number of large loans to certain borrowers, and deterioration in the financial condition of 
these borrowers could have a significant adverse impact on our asset quality.
Our growth over the past several years has been partially attributable to our ability to originate and retain relatively 
large loans given our asset size. At December 31, 2024, the size of our average loan held for investment was approximately 
$567,242. Further, at December 31, 2024, our 20 largest borrowing relationships, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, 
represented 11.3% of our outstanding loan portfolio, and 10.1% of our total commitments to extend credit. Along with other 
risks inherent in our loans, such as the deterioration of the underlying businesses or property securing these loans, the higher 
average size of our loans presents a risk to our lending operations. If any of our largest borrowers become unable to repay 
their loan obligations as a result of economic or market conditions or personal circumstances, our nonperforming loans and 
our provision for loan credit losses could increase significantly, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial 
condition and results of operations.
If we fail to establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, our financial statements could 
contain a material misstatement, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the SEC, companies are 
required to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of their internal controls over financial reporting. As part of this process, we 
are required to document and test our internal controls over financial reporting, management is required to assess and issue a 
report concerning our internal controls over financial reporting, and our independent registered public accounting firm is 
required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our internal controls over financial 
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of their inherent limitations, including the possibility of human 
error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes 
in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a 
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be prevented or detected on a 
timely basis. Even effective internal controls over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to 
the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements.
As described in Part II, Item 9A — Controls and Procedures of Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed February 26, 2025, we identified a material weakness in our internal controls 
over financial reporting relating to controls over employees’ ability to initiate certain manual transfers between deposit 
accounts. A material weakness, as defined by the SEC rules, is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, such that there 
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or 
detected on a timely basis. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we implemented remediation actions to address the 
material weakness in our internal controls and, as of December 31, 2024, this material weakness has been deemed 
remediated.
33

If additional material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, 
our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to revise or restate our 
financial results, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, 
restrict our ability to access the capital markets, require us to expend significant resources to correct the material weakness, 
subject us to fines, penalties or judgments, harm our reputation, adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, or 
otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence.
We rely heavily on our executive management team and other key employees, and the loss of any of these individuals 
could adversely impact our business or reputation.
Our success depends in large part on the performance of our key personnel, as well as on our ability to attract, 
motivate and retain highly qualified senior and middle management and other skilled employees. Competition for employees 
is intense, and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our 
business plan may be lengthy. We may not be successful in retaining our key employees, and the unexpected loss of services 
of one or more of our key personnel could have an adverse effect on our business because of their skills, knowledge of our 
primary markets, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If the 
services of any of our key personnel should become unavailable for any reason, we may not be able to identify and hire 
qualified persons on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition 
and results of operations.
Unauthorized access, cyber-crime and other threats to data security may require significant resources, harm our 
reputation, and otherwise cause harm to our business.
We necessarily collect, use and hold personal and financial information concerning individuals and businesses with 
which we have a banking relationship. This information includes non-public, personally-identifiable information that is 
protected under applicable federal and state laws and regulations. Additionally, certain of our data processing functions are 
not handled by us directly but are outsourced to third-party providers. Our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party 
service providers, may be vulnerable to threats to data security, security breaches, acts of vandalism and other physical 
security threats, computer viruses or compromises, ransomware attacks, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human 
errors or other similar events. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of 
our confidential business, employee or customer information, whether originating with us, our vendors or retail businesses, 
could severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of civil litigation and liability, require the payment of regulatory 
fines or penalties or undertaking of costly remediation efforts with respect to third parties affected by a security breach, 
disrupt our operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
It is difficult or impossible to defend against every risk being posed by changing technologies or criminals’ intent on 
committing cyber-crime. Our controls and protections and those of our vendors could prove inadequate. In the last few years, 
there have been an increasing number of cyber incidents and cyber criminals continue to increase their sophistication, 
including several well-publicized cyber-attacks that targeted other companies in the United States, including financial 
services companies much larger than us. These cyber incidents have been initiated from a variety of sources, including 
terrorist organizations and hostile foreign governments. As technology advances, the ability to initiate transactions and access 
data has also become more widely distributed among mobile devices, personal computers, automated teller machines, remote 
deposit capture sites and similar access points, some of which are not controlled or secured by us. It is possible that we could 
have exposure to liability and suffer losses as a result of a security breach or cyber-attack that occurred through no fault of 
our own. Further, the probability of a successful cyber-attack against us or one of our third-party services providers cannot be 
predicted, and in some cases, prevented. 
Cybersecurity risks are growing and, as a result, the cyber-resilience of banking organizations is of increased 
importance to federal and state banking agencies and other regulators. New or revised laws and regulations may significantly 
impact our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices, the collection, use, 
sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and employee information, and current or planned business activities. 
Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws to which we are subject could result 
in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could 
materially and adversely affect our profitability. 
34

Our business is susceptible to fraud.
The Company’s business exposes it to fraud risk from loan and deposit customers, the parties they do business with, 
as well as from employees, contractors and vendors. The Company relies on financial and other data from new and existing 
customers which could turn out to be fraudulent when accepting such customers, executing their financial transactions and 
making and purchasing loans and other financial assets. In times of increased economic stress, the Company is at increased 
risk of fraud losses. The Company believes it has underwriting and operational controls in place to prevent or detect such 
fraud, but cannot provide assurance that these controls will be effective in detecting fraud or that the Company will not 
experience fraud losses or incur costs or other damage related to such fraud, at levels that adversely affect financial results or 
reputation. The Company’s lending customers may also experience fraud in their businesses which could adversely affect 
their ability to repay their loans or make use of services. The Company’s and its customers’ exposure to fraud may increase 
the Company’s financial risk and reputation risk as it may result in unexpected litigation expense, other costs and loan losses 
that exceed those that have been provided for in the allowance for credit losses.
Our ability to attract and retain profitable bankers is critical to the success of our business strategy.
Our ability to retain and grow our loans, deposits and fee income depends upon the business generation capabilities, 
reputation and relationship management skills of our bankers. If we were to lose the services of any of our bankers, including 
profitable bankers employed by banks that we may acquire, to a new or existing competitor or otherwise, we may not be able 
to retain valuable relationships and some of our customers could choose to use the services of a competitor instead of our 
services.
Our growth strategy also relies on our ability to attract and retain additional profitable bankers. We may face 
difficulties in recruiting and retaining bankers of our desired caliber, including as a result of competition from other financial 
institutions. In particular, many of our competitors are significantly larger with greater financial resources and may be able to 
offer more attractive compensation packages and broader career opportunities. Additionally, we may incur significant 
expenses and expend significant time and resources on training, integration and business development before we are able to 
determine whether a new banker will be profitable or effective. If we are unable to attract and retain profitable bankers, or if 
our bankers fail to meet our expectations in terms of customer relationships and profitability, we may be unable to execute 
our business strategy, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 
We will be subject to heightened regulatory requirements if our total assets exceed $10 billion as of December 31 of any 
calendar year.
As of December 31, 2024, our total assets were $9.68 billion, and we expect our total assets to grow in excess of $10 
billion during the 2025 year. In addition to our current regulatory requirements, banks with $10 billion or more in total assets 
are, among other things: examined directly by the CFPB with respect to various federal consumer financial laws; subject to 
limits on debit interchange fees pursuant to Section 1075 of the Dodd-Frank Act, known as the Durbin Amendment; eligible 
for potentially a smaller dividend on holdings of Federal Reserve Bank stock; subject to the Volcker Rule’s limitations on 
proprietary trading and investments or sponsorship in covered funds; subject to the large bank assessment methodology for 
calculating FDIC insurance premiums; and no longer eligible to elect to be subject to the CBLR. Compliance with these 
additional ongoing requirements may necessitate additional personnel, the design and implementation of additional internal 
controls, or the incurrence of other significant expenses, among other things, any of which could have a significant adverse 
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our regulators may also consider our preparation for 
compliance with these regulatory requirements in the course of examining our operations generally or when considering any 
request from us or the Bank.
35

We will become subject to reduced debit interchange income and overdraft income and could face related adverse business 
consequences if our total assets grow in excess of $10 billion as of December 31 of any calendar year.
Debit card interchange fee restrictions set forth in the Durbin Amendment, as implemented by regulations of the 
Federal Reserve, cap the maximum debit interchange fee that a debit card issuer may receive per transaction. Debit card 
issuers with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion are exempt from these interchange fee restrictions. The 
exemption for small issuers ceases to apply as of July 1 of the year following the calendar year in which the debit card issuer 
has total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more at calendar year end. At December 31, 2024, we had total consolidated 
assets of $9.68 billion and our expectation is that we will exceed $10 billion in total consolidated assets during 2025. Any 
reduction in interchange income as a result of the loss of the exemption for small issuers under the Durbin Amendment could 
have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our interchange fees for the 
year ended December 31, 2024, were $8.3 million.
Similarly, the CFPB recently adopted final rules, effective October 1, 2025, that limits the overdraft fees that banks 
with more than $10 billion in assets can charge per occurrence. During 2024, our total overdraft fee income was 2.2 million. 
At this time, there is still some uncertainty surrounding this rule’s ultimate disposition and the timing of its effectiveness on 
Origin.
Moreover, our loss of eligibility under the exemption for small issuers could adversely affect or reduce our ability to 
maintain certain of our fee-sharing prepaid card partnerships, which have the right to terminate our agreement with respect to 
certain financial services under such circumstances.
We may have exposure to tax liabilities that are larger than we anticipate.
The tax laws applicable to our business activities are subject to interpretation and may change over time. From time 
to time, legislative initiatives, such as corporate tax rate changes, which may impact our effective tax rate and could adversely 
affect our deferred tax assets or our tax positions or liabilities, may be enacted. The taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in 
which we operate may challenge our tax positions, which could increase our effective tax rate and harm our financial position 
and results of operations. In addition, our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being higher than 
anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates or by changes in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles. 
We are subject to audit and review by U.S. federal and state tax authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit 
could have a negative effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, the determination of our provision 
for income taxes and other liabilities requires significant judgment by management. Although we believe that our estimates 
are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and could have a 
material adverse effect on our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.
The small to medium-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business 
developments, which may impair our borrowers’ ability to repay loans.
We focus our business development and marketing strategy primarily on small to medium-sized businesses. Small to 
medium-sized businesses frequently have smaller market shares than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic 
downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience substantial volatility in 
operating results, any of which may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small and 
medium-sized business often depends on the management skills, talents and efforts of one or two people or a small group of 
people, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these people could have an adverse impact on the business 
and its ability to repay its loan. If general economic conditions negatively impact the markets in which we operate and small 
to medium-sized businesses are adversely affected or our borrowers are otherwise harmed by adverse business developments, 
this, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
36

We face significant competition to attract and retain customers, which could impair our growth, decrease our profitability 
or result in loss of market share.
We operate in the highly competitive banking industry and face significant competition for customers from bank and 
nonbank competitors (including fintech companies), particularly regional and nationwide institutions, in originating loans, 
attracting deposits and providing other financial services. Our competitors are generally larger and may have significantly 
more resources, greater name recognition, and more extensive and established branch networks or geographic footprints than 
we do. Because of their scale, many of these competitors can be more aggressive than we can on loan and deposit pricing. 
Also, many of our nonbank competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. We expect 
competition to continue to intensify due to financial institution consolidation; legislative, regulatory and technological 
changes; and the emergence of alternative banking sources.
Our ability to compete successfully will depend on a number of factors, including, among other things:
•
our ability to develop, maintain and build long-term customer relationships based on top quality service, high ethical 
standards and safe, sound assets;
•
our scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands;
•
the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors;
•
customer satisfaction with our level of service;
•
our ability to expand our market position;
•
industry and general economic trends; and
•
our ability to keep pace with technological advances and to invest in new technology.
Increased competition could require us to increase the rates we pay on deposits or lower the rates we offer on loans, 
which could reduce our profitability. Our failure to compete effectively in our primary markets could cause us to lose market 
share and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business.
Our business plan emphasizes relationship focused banking. We have benefited from strong relationships with and 
among our customers. As a result, our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. As such, we strive 
to enhance our reputation by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of 
the communities we serve and delivering superior service to our customers. If our reputation is negatively affected by the 
actions of our employees or otherwise, our existing relationships may be damaged. We could lose some of our existing 
customers, including groups of large customers who have relationships with each other, and we may not be successful in 
attracting new customers. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and 
results of operations.
While we carefully monitor internal and external developments for areas of potential reputational risk and have 
established governance structures to assist in evaluating such risks in our business practices and decisions, adverse 
reputational impacts on third parties with whom we have important relationships may also adversely impact our reputation. 
Adverse impacts on our reputation, or the reputation of our industry, may also result in greater regulatory and/or legislative 
scrutiny, which may lead to laws, regulations or regulatory actions that may change or constrain the manner in which we 
engage with our customers and the products and services we offer. Adverse reputational impacts or events may also increase 
our litigation risk. 
Over recent years we have faced increased public scrutiny related to ESG activities. We risk damage to our brand 
and reputation if we fail to act responsibly in a number of areas, such as diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”), 
environmental stewardship, human capital management, support for our local communities, corporate governance and 
transparency, or fail to consider ESG factors in our business operations. Additionally, investors and shareholder advocates are 
placing ever increasing emphasis on how corporations address ESG issues in their business strategy when making investment 
decisions and when developing their investment theses and proxy recommendations. We may incur meaningful costs with 
respect to our ESG efforts and if such efforts are negatively perceived, our reputation and stock price may suffer.
37

Our business has grown rapidly, and we may not be able to maintain our historical rate of growth, which could have an 
adverse effect on our ability to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our business has grown rapidly. Financial institutions that grow rapidly can experience significant difficulties as a 
result of rapid growth. Furthermore, our primary strategy focuses on organic growth, supplemented by acquisitions of 
banking teams or other financial institutions. We may be unable to execute on aspects of our growth strategy to sustain our 
historical rate of growth or we may be unable to grow at all. For example, we may be unable to generate sufficient new loans 
and deposits within acceptable risk and expense tolerances, obtain the personnel or funding necessary for additional growth 
or find suitable banking teams or acquisition candidates. Various factors, such as economic conditions and competition, may 
impede or prohibit the growth of our operations, the opening of new branches, and the consummation of acquisitions. Further, 
we may be unable to attract and retain experienced bankers, which could adversely affect our growth. The success of our 
strategy also depends on our ability to effectively manage growth, which is dependent upon a number of factors, including 
our ability to adapt existing credit, operational, technology and governance infrastructure to accommodate our expanded 
operations. If we fail to build infrastructure sufficient to support rapid growth or fail to implement one or more aspects of our 
strategy, we may be unable to maintain historical earnings trends, which could have an adverse effect on our business, 
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions or the Federal Reserve 
may direct us to restrain our growth.
We may not be able to manage the risks associated with our anticipated growth and expansion through de novo 
branching.
Our business strategy includes evaluating strategic opportunities to grow through de novo branching, and we believe 
that banking location expansion has been meaningful to our growth since inception. De novo branching carries with it certain 
potential risks, including significant startup costs and anticipated initial operating losses; an inability to gain regulatory 
approval; an inability to secure the services of qualified senior management to operate the de novo banking location and 
successfully integrate and promote our corporate culture; poor market reception for de novo banking locations established in 
markets where we do not have a preexisting reputation; challenges posed by local economic conditions; challenges associated 
with securing attractive locations at a reasonable cost; and the additional strain on management resources and internal 
systems and controls. Failure to adequately manage the risks associated with our anticipated growth through de novo 
branching could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. De novo branches 
require regulatory approval or non-objection, which may not be forthcoming.
Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in accounting policies, standards 
and interpretations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and other bodies that establish accounting standards 
periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards governing the preparation of our financial statements. 
Additionally, those bodies that establish and interpret the accounting standards (such as the FASB, SEC and banking 
regulators) may change prior interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. Changes resulting from 
these new standards may result in materially different financial results and may require that we change how we process, 
analyze and report financial information and that we change financial reporting controls.
We may pursue acquisitions in the future, which could expose us to financial, execution and operational risks.
Although we plan to continue to grow our business organically, we may, from time to time, consider acquisition 
opportunities that we believe complement our activities and have the ability to enhance our profitability. Our acquisition 
activities could be material to our business and involve a number of risks, including those associated with:
•
the identification of suitable institutions or assets for acquisition;
•
the diversion of management attention from the operation of our existing business to identify, evaluate and negotiate 
potential transactions;
•
the ability to attract funding to support additional growth within acceptable risk tolerances; 
•
the use of inaccurate estimates and judgments to evaluate credit, operations, management and market risks with 
respect to the target institution or assets;
•
the ability to maintain asset quality; 
38

•
the adequacy of due diligence and the potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities related to the 
acquisition;
•
the retention of customers and key personnel, including bankers; 
•
the timing and uncertainty associated with obtaining necessary regulatory approvals; 
•
the incurrence of an impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and adverse effects on our results of 
operations;
•
the ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses;
•
litigation risk; and
•
the maintenance of adequate regulatory capital.
The market for acquisition targets is highly competitive, which may adversely affect our ability to find acquisition 
candidates that fit our strategy and standards at acceptable prices. We face significant competition in pursuing acquisition 
targets from other banks and financial institutions, many of which possess greater financial, human, technical and other 
resources than we do. Our ability to compete in acquiring target institutions will depend on our available financial resources 
to fund the acquisitions, including the amount of cash and cash equivalents we have and the liquidity and value of our 
common stock. In addition, increased competition may also drive up the acquisition consideration that we will be required to 
pay in order to successfully capitalize on attractive acquisition opportunities.
Acquisitions of financial institutions also involve operational risks and uncertainties, such as unknown or contingent 
liabilities with no available manner of recourse, exposure to unexpected problems such as asset quality, the retention of key 
employees and customers, and other issues that could negatively affect our business. We may not be able to complete future 
acquisitions after dedicating substantial resources or, if completed, we may not be able to successfully integrate the 
operations, technology platforms, management, products and services of the entities that we acquire or to realize our expected 
benefits or our attempts to eliminate redundancies. The integration process may also require significant time and attention 
from our management that would otherwise be directed toward servicing existing business and developing new business. 
Failure to successfully integrate the entities we acquire into our existing operations in a timely manner may increase our 
operating costs significantly and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 
Further, acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and, therefore, some dilution 
of our book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future acquisition, and the carrying 
amount of any goodwill that we currently maintain or may acquire may be subject to impairment in future periods.
The markets in which we operate are susceptible to hurricanes and other natural disasters, adverse weather and climate 
change effects, which could result in a disruption of our operations and increases in loan losses.
A significant portion of our business is generated from markets that have been, and may continue to be, damaged by 
hurricanes, floods, tropical storms, tornadoes and other natural disasters and adverse weather, which may grow more severe 
as a result of climate change. Natural disasters can disrupt our operations, cause widespread property damage, and severely 
depress the local economies in which we operate. If the economies in our primary markets experience an overall decline as a 
result of a natural disaster, adverse weather, climate change or other disaster, demand for loans and our other products and 
services could be reduced. In addition, the rates of delinquencies, foreclosures, bankruptcies and loan losses may increase 
substantially, as uninsured property losses or sustained job interruption or loss may materially impair the ability of borrowers 
to repay their loans. Moreover, the value of real estate or other collateral that secures the loans could be materially and 
adversely affected by a disaster. A disaster could, therefore, result in decreased revenue and loan losses that could have an 
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
39

We have a continuing need for technological change, and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new 
technology, or we may experience operational challenges when implementing new technology.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new 
technology-driven products and services (including those related to or involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, 
blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies) and an established and growing demand for mobile and other phone and 
computer banking applications. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to 
reduce costs as well as service our customers better. Largely unregulated “fintech” businesses have increased their 
participation in the lending and payments businesses and have increased competition in these businesses. This trend is 
expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Our future success will depend, at least in part, upon our ability to address the 
needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for 
convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our products and 
service offerings. We may experience operational challenges as we implement these new technology enhancements or 
products, which could result in us not fully realizing the anticipated benefits from such new technology or require us to incur 
significant costs to remedy any such challenges in a timely manner.
These changes may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate. Many of our larger competitors have 
substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or 
superior products compared to those that we will be able to provide, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. 
Accordingly, we may lose customers seeking new technology-driven products and services to the extent we are unable to 
provide such products and services. 
New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject us to additional risks.
From time to time, we implement new lines of business, or offer new products and product enhancements as well as 
new services within our existing lines of business, and we will continue to do so in the future. There are substantial risks and 
uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In 
implementing, developing or marketing new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, we may invest 
significant time and resources, although we may not assign the appropriate level of resources or expertise necessary to make 
these new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services successful or to realize their expected benefits. 
Further, initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business, products, product enhancements or 
services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance 
with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the ultimate implementation of a 
new line of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services. Furthermore, any new line of business, 
product, product enhancement or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal 
controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or 
offerings of new products, product enhancements or services could have an adverse impact on our business, financial 
condition or results of operations.
We are dependent on the use of data and modeling in our management’s decision-making and faulty data, or modeling 
approaches could negatively impact our decision-making ability or possibly subject us to regulatory scrutiny in the future.
The use of statistical and quantitative models and other quantitative analyses is endemic to bank decision-making, 
and the employment of such analyses is becoming increasingly widespread in our operations. Liquidity stress testing, interest 
rate sensitivity analysis, and the identification of possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations are all examples of 
areas in which we are dependent on models and the data that underlies them. The use of statistical and quantitative models is 
also becoming more prevalent in regulatory compliance. While we are not currently subject to annual Dodd-Frank Act stress 
testing and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review submissions, we currently utilize stress testing for capital, credit 
and liquidity purposes and anticipate that model-derived testing may become more extensively implemented by regulators in 
the future.
40

We anticipate data-based modeling will penetrate further into bank decision-making, particularly risk management 
efforts, as the capacities developed to meet rigorous stress testing requirements are able to be employed more widely and in 
differing applications. While we believe these quantitative techniques and approaches improve our decision-making, they 
also create the possibility that faulty data or flawed quantitative approaches could negatively impact our decision-making 
ability or, if we become subject to regulatory stress-testing in the future, adverse regulatory scrutiny. We seek to mitigate this 
risk by performing back-testing to analyze the accuracy of these techniques and approaches. Secondarily, because of the 
complexity inherent in these approaches, misunderstanding or misuse of their outputs could similarly result in suboptimal 
decision-making. Failure to successfully manage these risks could have an adverse impact on our business, financial 
condition or results of operations.
We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans in some circumstances, which could diminish our liquidity.
Historically, we have originated mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market. When mortgage loans are sold in 
the secondary market, we are required to make customary representations and warranties to the purchasers about the 
mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated. The mortgage loan sale agreements require us to repurchase or 
substitute mortgage loans or indemnify buyers against losses, in the event we breach these representations and warranties. In 
addition, we may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage 
loan. With respect to loans that are originated by us through our broker or correspondents, the remedies available against the 
originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not be as broad as the remedies available to a purchaser of mortgage loans 
against us or the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not have the financial capacity to perform remedies that 
otherwise may be available. Therefore, if a purchaser enforces their remedies against us, we may not be able to recover losses 
from the originating broker or correspondent. If repurchase and indemnity demands increase and such demands are valid 
claims, it could diminish our liquidity, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of 
operations. We were not required to repurchase any material amount of mortgage loans sold into the secondary market during 
2024, 2023 or 2022.
A lack of liquidity could impair our ability to fund operations.
Liquidity is essential to our business, and we monitor our liquidity and manage our liquidity risk at the holding 
company and bank levels daily. We rely on our ability to generate deposits and effectively manage the repayment and 
maturity schedules of our loans and investment securities, respectively, to ensure that we have adequate liquidity to fund our 
operations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of our investment securities, the sale of loans, 
and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our most important source of funds is deposits. 
Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments as providing a better risk/return tradeoff. If 
our customers move money out of deposits and into other investments such as money market funds, we would lose a 
relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing our funding costs and reducing our net interest margin, net interest income and 
net income. 
Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities, 
and proceeds from the issuance and sale of our equity and debt securities to investors. Access to liquidity may be negatively 
impacted by the value of our securities portfolio, if liquidity and/or business strategy necessitate the sales of securities in a 
loss position. Additional liquidity is provided by the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas. Recently proposed changes to the Federal Home Loan Bank system could adversely 
impact the Company’s access to Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings or increase the cost of such borrowings. We also may 
borrow funds from third-party lenders, such as other financial institutions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate 
to finance or capitalize our activities, or on terms that are acceptable to us, could be impaired by factors that affect us directly 
or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and 
expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. Our access to funding sources could also be affected by a 
decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in our primary market area or by one or more adverse 
regulatory actions against us. In addition, our access to deposits may be affected by the liquidity and/or cash flow needs of 
depositors, which may be exacerbated in an inflationary, recessionary, or elevated rate environment.
41

Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our 
expenses, or to fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which 
could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and could, in turn, have an adverse effect on our business, financial 
condition and results of operations. In addition, because our primary asset at the holding company level is the bank, our 
liquidity at the holding company level depends primarily on our receipt of dividends from the bank. If the bank is unable to 
pay dividends to us for any reason, we may be unable to satisfy our holding company level obligations, which include 
funding operating expenses and debt service obligations.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, and if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, we may not be able to 
maintain regulatory compliance.
We face significant capital and other regulatory requirements as a financial institution. We may need to raise 
additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet our commitments and 
business needs, which could include the possibility of financing acquisitions. In addition, we, on a consolidated basis, and 
Origin Bank, on a stand-alone basis, must meet certain regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity in 
such amounts as the regulators may require from time to time. Importantly, regulatory capital requirements could increase 
from current levels, which could require us to raise additional capital or reduce our operations. Even if we satisfy all 
applicable regulatory capital minimums, our regulators could ask us to maintain capital levels which are significantly in 
excess of those minimums. Our ability to raise additional capital depends on conditions in the capital markets, economic 
conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry, market conditions 
and governmental activities, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will 
be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to maintain capital to meet regulatory 
requirements, we could be subject to enforcement actions or other regulatory consequences, which could have an adverse 
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
By engaging in derivative transactions, we are exposed to additional credit and market risk.
We use interest rate swaps to help manage our interest rate risk from recorded financial assets and liabilities when 
they can be demonstrated to effectively hedge a designated asset or liability and the asset or liability exposes us to interest 
rate risk or risks inherent in customer related derivatives. We use other derivative financial instruments to help manage other 
economic risks, such as liquidity and credit risk, including exposures that arise from business activities that result in the 
receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Our 
derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our known or expected 
cash receipts principally related to our fixed rate loan assets. Hedging interest rate risk is a complex process, requiring 
sophisticated models and routine monitoring, and is not a perfect science. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged 
assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in market value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation 
will generally be offset by income or loss on the derivative instruments that are linked to the hedged assets and liabilities. By 
engaging in derivative transactions, we are exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk 
exists to the extent of the fair value gain in the derivative. Market risk exists to the extent that interest rates change in ways 
that are significantly different from what we expected when we entered into the derivative transaction. The existence of credit 
and market risk associated with our derivative instruments could adversely affect our net interest income and, therefore, could 
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
42

The fair value of our investment securities can fluctuate due to factors outside of our control. 
At December 31, 2024, the fair value of our portfolio of available for sale investment securities was approximately 
$1.10 billion, which included a net unrealized loss of approximately $134.9 million, before taxes. The unrealized loss resulted 
from the decline in fair value of our available for sale investment securities portfolio starting during the year ended December 
31, 2022, and continuing through the year ended December 31, 2024, which decline was primarily due to the steepening of 
the short end of the yield curve as a result of the rapid increase in interest rates intended to reduce inflation. The unrealized 
loss negatively impacted total stockholders’ equity. Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of 
securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these securities. These factors include, 
but are not limited to, rating agency actions in respect of the securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying 
securities, and changes in market interest rates and continued instability in the capital markets. Any of these factors, among 
others, could cause an increase in the amount of the allowance for credit losses as it pertains to available for sale or held-to-
maturity debt securities, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and 
future prospects. The process for determining if a security has a credit loss often requires complex, subjective judgments 
about whether there has been a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, whether management has the 
intent or ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, the future 
financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the security, and other relevant factors.
We rely on third parties to provide key components of our business infrastructure, and a failure of these parties to perform 
for any reason could disrupt our operations.
Third parties provide key components of our business infrastructure such as data processing, internet connections, 
network access, core application processing, statement production, account analysis and mortgage servicing. Our business 
depends on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and 
third-party servicers. The failure or breach of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service 
agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and 
telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand 
for such services exceeds capacity, or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. In addition, we have engaged 
a third-party to administer our mortgage servicing activities through a subservicing arrangement. While we endeavor to 
manage and oversee our third-party vendors, these vendors may have contact with our customers and address customer 
complaints, which creates reputational and, potentially, regulatory risk. Replacing vendors or addressing other issues with our 
third-party service providers could entail significant delay and expense. If we are unable to efficiently replace ineffective 
service providers, or if we experience a significant, sustained or repeated, system failure or service denial, it could 
compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and subject us to 
additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, 
financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with our lending activities.
In the course of our business, we may purchase real estate, or we may foreclose on and take title to real estate. As a 
result, we could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. We may be held liable to a 
governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by 
these parties in connection with environmental contamination or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic 
substances or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be 
substantial. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be subject to common law 
claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. 
Any significant environmental liabilities could cause an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of 
operations.
We may be subject to claims and litigation pertaining to intellectual property.
Banking and other financial services companies, such as ours, rely on technology companies to provide information 
technology products and services necessary to support their day-to-day operations. Technology companies frequently enter 
into litigation based on allegations of patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent 
holding companies seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. Competitors of our vendors, or other 
individuals or companies, may from time to time claim to hold intellectual property sold to us by our vendors. Such claims 
may increase in the future as the financial services sector becomes more reliant on information technology vendors. The 
plaintiffs in these actions frequently seek injunctions and substantial damages.
43

Regardless of the scope or validity of such patents or other intellectual property rights, or the merits of any claims by 
potential or actual litigants, we may have to engage in protracted litigation. Such litigation is often expensive, time-
consuming, disruptive to our operations and distracting to management. If we are found to infringe one or more patents or 
other intellectual property rights, we may be required to pay substantial damages or royalties to a third party. In certain cases, 
we may consider entering into licensing agreements for disputed intellectual property, although no assurance can be given 
that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. These licenses may also significantly 
increase our operating expenses. If legal matters related to intellectual property claims were resolved against us or settled, we 
could be required to make payments in amounts that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and 
results of operations.
We and other financial institutions have been the subject of litigation, investigations and other proceedings which could 
result in legal liability and damage to our reputation.
We and certain of our directors, officers and subsidiaries are named from time to time as defendants in litigation and 
are the subject of investigations and other proceedings relating to our business and activities, including, during 2024 and 
continuing into 2025, proceedings relating to the questioned activity discussed in detail in Part II, Item 8, Note 18 — 
Commitments and Contingencies under Loss Contingencies. Past, present and future litigation has included or could include 
claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We are also 
involved from time to time in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental, law 
enforcement and self-regulatory agencies regarding our business. These matters could result in adverse judgments, 
settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, amendments and/or restatements of our SEC filings and/or financial statements, 
determinations of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures or other relief. Substantial legal liability or 
significant regulatory action against us, as well as matters in which we are involved that are ultimately determined in our 
favor, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, cause significant 
reputational harm to our business, divert management attention from the operation of our business and/or result in additional 
litigation. 
Banking institutions are also increasingly the target of class action lawsuits. Most recently there has been an increase 
in class action lawsuits filed claiming deceptive practices or violations of account terms in connection with non-sufficient 
fees or overdraft charges. We have successfully defended and resolved similar class action lawsuits in the past. However, if a 
court rules adversely to our defense of any class action lawsuits, or if we enter into a settlement agreement in connection with 
any class action lawsuit, we could be exposed to monetary damages, reputational harm, or subject to limits on our ability to 
operate our business, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
We may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial 
soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, 
counterparty, and other relationships. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties, and through transactions 
with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, and 
other financial intermediaries. In addition, we participate in loans originated by other institutions, and we participate in 
syndicated transactions (including shared national credits) in which other lenders serve as the lead bank. As a result, defaults 
by, declines in the financial condition of, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial institutions, financial 
service companies or the financial services industry generally, may lead to market-wide liquidity, asset quality or other 
problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. These problems, losses or defaults could have an 
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
44

Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Industry
We operate in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern our operations, corporate 
governance, executive compensation and accounting principles, or changes in them, or our failure to comply with them, 
could subject us to regulatory action or penalties.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and legal requirements that govern almost all aspects of our 
operations. These laws and regulations are not intended to protect our stockholders. Rather, these laws and regulations are 
intended to protect customers, depositors, the Deposit Insurance Fund and the overall financial stability of the U.S., and not 
stockholders or counterparties. These laws and regulations, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, 
limit the magnitude of fees we can charge our customers, impose limitations on the business activities in which we can 
engage, limit the dividends or distributions that Origin Bank can pay to us, and that we can pay to our stockholders, and 
impose certain specific accounting requirements on us that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier 
charges to earnings or reductions in our capital than U.S. GAAP alone would generally require. Compliance with laws and 
regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations often impose additional compliance costs. Our 
failure to comply with these laws and regulations, even if the failure follows good faith effort or reflects a difference in 
interpretation, could subject us to restrictions on our business activities, fines and other penalties, any of which could 
adversely affect our results of operations, capital base and the price of our securities. Further, any new laws, rules and 
regulations could make compliance more difficult or expensive. All of these laws and regulations, and the supervisory 
framework applicable to our industry, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of 
operations. See the discussion above at Supervision, Regulation, and Other Factors for an additional discussion of the 
extensive regulation and supervision the Company and the Bank are subject to.
We are subject to stringent capital requirements, which may result in lower returns on equity, require us to raise 
additional capital, limit growth opportunities or result in regulatory restrictions.
Increased regulatory capital requirements (and the associated compliance costs), whether due to the adoption of new 
laws and regulations, changes in existing laws and regulations, or more expansive or aggressive interpretations of existing 
laws and regulations, may require us to raise additional capital, or impact our ability to repurchase shares of capital stock, pay 
dividends or pay compensation to our executives, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial 
condition, results of operations and the value of our common stock. If Origin Bank does not meet minimum capital 
requirements, it will be subject to prompt corrective action by the Federal Reserve. Prompt corrective action can include 
progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions. Failure to exceed the capital 
conservation buffer will result in certain limitations on dividends, capital repurchases, and discretionary bonus payments to 
executive officers. Even if we meet minimum capital requirements, it is possible that our regulators may ask us to raise 
additional capital.
We face a risk of noncompliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.
The federal Bank Secrecy Act, USA Patriot Act and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among 
other duties, to institute and maintain effective anti-money laundering programs and file suspicious activity and currency 
transaction reports as appropriate. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, established by the 
Treasury to administer the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those 
requirements and may coordinate enforcement efforts with the individual federal bank regulatory agencies, as well as the U.S. 
Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service. Federal bank regulatory agencies 
and state bank regulators also have increased their focus on compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering 
regulations. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and 
regulatory actions such as restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to 
proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition and 
results of operations.
45

Failure by Origin Bank to perform satisfactorily on its Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) evaluations could make it 
more difficult for our business to grow.
The performance of a bank under the CRA, in meeting the credit needs of its community is a factor that must be 
taken into consideration when the federal banking agencies evaluate applications related to mergers and acquisitions, as well 
as branch opening and relocations. If Origin Bank is unable to maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating, our ability to 
complete the acquisition of another financial institution or open a new branch will be adversely impacted. If Origin Bank 
received an overall CRA rating of less than “Satisfactory”, the Federal Reserve would not re-evaluate its rating until its next 
CRA examination, which may not occur for several more years, and it is possible that a low CRA rating would not improve 
in the future.
Increases in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance premiums could adversely affect our earnings and results 
of operations.
The deposits of Origin Bank are insured by the FDIC up to legal limits and, accordingly, subject it to the payment of 
FDIC deposit insurance assessments. The Bank’s regular assessments are determined by the level of its assessment base and 
its risk classification, which is based on its regulatory capital levels and the level of supervisory concern that it poses. 
Moreover, the FDIC has the unilateral power to change deposit insurance assessment rates and the manner in which deposit 
insurance is calculated and also to charge special assessments to FDIC-insured institutions. The FDIC utilized these powers 
during the financial crisis for the purpose of restoring the reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Beginning in the first 
quarterly assessment period of 2023, the FDIC deposit insurance premiums were increased by two basis points. Any future 
special assessments, increases in assessment rates or premiums, or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums could 
reduce our profitability or limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities, which could materially and adversely 
affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks Related to Investing in Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may be subject to substantial fluctuations, which may make it difficult for you to 
sell your shares at the volume, prices and times desired.
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile, which may make it difficult for you to resell your 
shares at the volume, prices and times desired. There are many factors that may impact the market price and trading volume 
of our common stock, including, without limitation:
•
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, financial condition or asset quality;
•
changes in economic or business conditions;
•
the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies, including the interest rate policies of the Federal 
Reserve, or in laws or regulations affecting us;
•
the public reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;
•
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; 
•
the number (if any) of securities analysts covering us;
•
publication of research reports about us, our competitors, or the financial services industry generally, or changes in, 
or failure to meet, securities analysts’ estimates of our financial and operating performance, or lack of research 
reports by industry analysts or ceasing of coverage;
•
changes in market valuations or earnings of companies that investors deem comparable to us;
•
the trading volume of our common stock;
•
future issuances of our common stock or other securities;
•
future sales of our common stock by us or our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders;
•
additions or departures of key personnel;
46

•
perceptions in the marketplace regarding our competitors and us;
•
significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or 
involving our competitors or us;
•
other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, 
products and services; and
•
other news, announcements or disclosures (whether by us or others) related to us, our competitors, our core market 
or the financial services industry.
In particular, the realization of any of the risks described in this “Risk Factors” section of this report or other 
unknown risks could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and cause the value of your 
investment to decline. The stock market and, in particular, the market for financial institution stocks have experienced 
substantial fluctuations in recent years, which in many cases have been unrelated to the operating performance and prospects 
of particular companies. In addition, significant fluctuations in the trading volume of our common stock may cause 
significant price variations to occur. Increased market volatility could have an adverse effect on the market price of our 
common stock, which could make it difficult to sell your shares at the volume, prices and times desired.
Our dividend policy may change without notice, our future ability to pay dividends is subject to restrictions, and we may 
not pay dividends in the future. We are dependent on dividends from the Bank to meet our financial obligations and pay 
dividends to our stockholders.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such cash dividends as our board of directors may declare 
out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, change the 
amount or frequency of dividends or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely at any time without notice to our 
stockholders. Our ability to pay dividends may also be limited on account of our outstanding indebtedness as we generally 
must make payments on our junior subordinated indebtedness and our outstanding indebtedness before any dividends can be 
paid on our common stock.
Additionally, because our primary asset is our investment in the stock of Origin Bank, we are dependent upon 
dividends from the Bank to pay our operating expenses, satisfy our obligations and pay dividends on our common stock, and 
the Bank’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock will substantially depend upon its earnings and financial condition, 
liquidity and capital requirements, the general economic and regulatory climate and other factors deemed relevant by its 
board of directors. In addition, our and the Bank’s ability to declare and pay dividends depends on numerous laws and 
banking regulations and guidance that limit our and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends, including the guidelines of the 
Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we 
may not be able to make, or may have to reduce or eliminate, the payment of dividends on our common stock. Any change in 
the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could have a material adverse effect on the market price 
of our common stock.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit and is subject to risk of loss. 
Your investment in our common stock will not be a bank deposit and will not be insured or guaranteed by the FDIC 
or any other government agency. Your investment will be subject to investment risk, and you must be capable of affording 
the loss of your entire investment.
Item 1B. 
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. 
Cybersecurity
Origin’s information security program is designed to protect the security, availability, integrity, and confidentiality 
of our computer systems, networks, and software and information assets, including client and other sensitive data. The 
program is comprised of policies, guidelines, and procedures, which are intended to align with regulatory guidance, and 
common industry practices. Assessing, identifying and managing cybersecurity related risks are integrated into our overall 
enterprise risk management process.
47

Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
Origin follows FFIEC guidance in protecting its network and information assets with industry-tested security 
products and processes. Our Network and Information Security teams actively monitor company networks and systems to 
detect suspicious or malicious events. The Company evaluates potential cyber risks, as appropriate, in its regular risk 
assessments. Additionally, we conduct vulnerability scans, and contract with third-party vendors to perform penetration tests 
against the Company’s network. The Company also engages expert cyber consultants, as necessary and appropriate. 
At Origin, we expect each employee to be responsible for the security and confidentiality of client information. We 
communicate this responsibility to employees upon hiring, and regularly throughout their employment. We require each 
employee to complete training to protect the confidentiality of client information at the time of hire and during each year of 
employment. Employees must successfully pass a test to demonstrate understanding of these requirements and provide 
acknowledgement of their responsibilities.
Additionally, we regularly provide employees with information security awareness training, covering the recognition 
and appropriate handling of potential phishing emails, which can introduce malware to a company’s network, result in the 
theft of user credentials and, ultimately, place client or employee data, or other sensitive company data, at risk. Origin 
employs a number of technical controls to mitigate the risk of phishing emails. We regularly test employees to determine 
their susceptibility to phishing test emails. We require susceptible employees to take additional training and provide regular 
reports to management. We additionally maintain procedures for the safe storage and handling and secure disposal of 
sensitive information. 
Before engaging third-party service providers, we perform due diligence in order to identify and evaluate their cyber 
risks. This process is led by the Operational Risk Management team and includes participation of dedicated information 
security resources. Risk assessments are performed using Service Organization Controls (“SOC”) reports and other tools. 
Third party service providers processing sensitive client data are contractually required to meet applicable legal and 
regulatory obligations to protect sensitive data against cyber security threats and unauthorized access to the sensitive data. 
After contract executions, third-party service providers undergo ongoing monitoring to ensure they continue to maintain 
internal controls and protocols designed to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, assets, data, and capabilities.
As part of our information security program, we have adopted an Information and Cybersecurity Incident Response 
Plan (Incident Response Plan), which is primarily overseen by our Senior Vice President, Information Security Officer 
(“ISO”). The Incident Response Plan describes our processes and procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents, 
outlining various work streams, including containment and remediation actions by information technology and security 
personnel, as well as operational response actions by business, communications, and risk personnel. Our incident response 
team performs exercises to simulate responses to cybersecurity events.
The Incident Response Plan includes procedures for escalation and reporting of potentially significant cybersecurity 
incidents to our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Legal Counsel, and other 
executives as needed.
To date, we have not experienced a cybersecurity incident that has materially impacted our business strategy, results 
of operations, or financial condition. Despite our efforts, there can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management 
processes and measures described will be fully implemented, complied with, or effective in protecting our systems and 
information. We face risks from certain cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect our 
business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Please see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion 
of the risks associated with an interruption or breach in our information systems or infrastructure.
48

Cybersecurity Governance
Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our business and affairs, including risks associated with 
cybersecurity threats. The Board oversees our corporate risk governance processes primarily through its committees, and 
oversight of cybersecurity threats is delegated primarily to our Risk Committee. Management also participates in Cyber Risk 
and Information Technology Committees used to govern and oversee the information security program. The Risk Committee 
receives updates from management regarding review and assessments of cybersecurity and technology risk consistent with 
FFIEC guidance. Cybersecurity governance is a standing agenda item on each Risk Committee meeting. The Risk Committee 
reports to the full Board on a quarterly basis, including an overview of all matters discussed and approved at each Risk 
Committee meeting. Additionally, we have engaged the former Chief Information Officer of a Fortune 500 global technology 
company to consult with our Board of Directors, management, and management-level Cyber Risk and Information 
Technology Committees on cybersecurity and data privacy matters.
Our ISO is responsible for the Company’s information security program. Our ISO holds a degree in Computer 
Information Systems and is a graduate of Louisiana Tech University. He possesses over 18 years of experience in diverse 
technology and information security roles within the financial services sector, with five years’ experience in the ISO role. In 
this role, the ISO manages the Company’s information security and day-to-day cybersecurity operations and supports the 
information security risk oversight responsibilities of the Board and its committees. The ISO is a member of our Corporate 
Operations group and reports to our Chief Risk Officer, who in turn reports to our President and CEO. The ISO regularly 
attends Risk Committee meetings to review the Company’s material cybersecurity developments and risks, and otherwise 
periodically provides relevant cybersecurity updates to the Risk Committee, as appropriate.
Item 2. 
Properties
At December 31, 2024, our executive offices and those of Origin Bank were located at 500 South Service Road East, 
Ruston, Louisiana 71270 and we operated through over 60 locations in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama, and 
the Florida Panhandle, including loan production offices. At December 31, 2024, we had 18 banking centers in North 
Louisiana, 15 banking centers in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex area, 9 banking centers in East Texas, 9 banking centers in 
the Houston metroplex, 7 banking centers in the Ridgeland, Mississippi area, and one banking center each in South Alabama 
and the Florida Panhandle. We expect to close six of these banking centers at the end of February 2025, four in the Dallas-
Fort Worth market, and one each in the Louisiana and Mississippi markets. At December 31, 2024, Origin Bank owned its 
main office building and 30 of its banking centers, as well as a controlling interest in its operations center. The remaining 
facilities were occupied under lease agreements, the terms of which range from month to month to 29 years. We believe that 
our banking and other offices are in good condition and are suitable and adequate to our needs.
At December 31, 2024, our insurance holdings operated through 12 leased offices primarily located in Louisiana. 
Item 3. 
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to various legal actions that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. While the 
ultimate outcome of pending proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, at this time, management does not expect any 
such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial 
position or results of operations. However, one or more unfavorable outcomes in any legal action against us could have a 
material adverse effect for the period in which they are resolved. In addition, regardless of their merits or their ultimate 
outcomes, such matters are costly, divert management’s attention and may materially adversely affect our reputation, even if 
resolved in our favor.
Item 4. 
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
49

PART II
Item 5. 
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of 
Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “OBK”. Our common stock began 
trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on May 9, 2018. Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our 
common stock.
At February 15, 2025, there were approximately 9,389 holders of record of our common stock as reported by our 
transfer agent.
We intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, subject to approval by our board of directors. 
Although we expect to pay dividends according to our dividend policy, we may elect not to pay dividends. Any declarations 
of dividends, and the amount and timing thereof, will be at the discretion of our board of directors. In determining the amount 
of any future dividends, our board of directors will take into account our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition 
and any other relevant factors. The primary source for dividends paid to stockholders are dividends or capital distributions 
paid to the Company from the Bank. There are regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. Therefore, 
there can be no assurance that we will pay any dividends to holders of our stock or the amount of any such dividends. See 
“Item 1. Business - Regulation and Supervision” above and see Note 17 — Capital and Regulatory Matters contained in Part 
II, Item 8 of this report.
Equity Compensation Plans
See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder 
Matters”.
50

Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total 
stockholder return for the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank TR index (collectively the 
“Indices”) for the period beginning on December 31, 2019, through December 31, 2024. Our stock was previously traded on 
Nasdaq under the symbol “OBNK” and is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “OBK”. The 
following reflects index values as of close of trading, assumes $100.00 invested on December 31, 2019, in our common 
stock, and the Indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The historical price of our common stock 
represented in this graph represents past performance and is not necessarily indicative of future performance. 
After careful consideration of industry, average asset size, market capitalization, constituents within the indices, and 
overall comparability to our compensation peer group, we have determined the most comparable index is represented by the 
Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank TR Index.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Stockholder Return
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
Nasdaq Composite Index
Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank TR Index
12/31/19
12/31/20
12/31/21
12/31/22
12/31/23
12/31/24
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
12/31/2019
12/31/2020
12/31/2021
12/31/2022
12/31/2023
12/31/2024
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
$ 
100.00 
$ 
74.55 
$ 
116.63 
$ 
101.12 
$ 
99.86 
$ 
95.23 
Nasdaq Composite Index
 
100.00 
 
143.64 
 
174.36 
 
116.65 
 
167.30 
 
215.22 
Nasdaq OMX ABA Community 
Bank TR Index
 
100.00 
 
89.64 
 
121.03 
 
111.12 
 
108.99 
 
125.60 
Stock Repurchases
In July 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the 
Company may, from time to time, purchase up to $50 million of its outstanding common stock. The shares may be 
repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, depending upon market conditions 
and other factors, and in accordance with applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The stock 
repurchase program is intended to expire in three years but may be terminated or amended by the Board of Directors at any 
time. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares at any time.
At December 31, 2024, there remained $50.0 million of capacity under the stock repurchase program. There were no 
stock repurchases during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Item 6.  
[Reserved]
51

Item 7. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis presents our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated 
basis. However, we conduct all of our material business operations through our wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Origin Bank, 
and the discussion and analysis that follows primarily relates to activities conducted at the Bank level.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and 
related notes contained in Item 8 of this report. To the extent that this discussion describes prior performance, the 
descriptions relate only to the periods listed, which may not be indicative of our future financial outcomes. In addition to 
historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions 
that could cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are 
discussed in the sections titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We 
assume no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.
Discussion in this Form 10-K includes results of operations and financial condition for 2024 and 2023 and year-
over-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023. For discussion on results of operations and financial condition pertaining to 
2023 and 2022 and year-over-year comparisons between 2023 and 2022, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and 
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 
year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and with general practices within 
the financial services industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that 
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical 
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances. These 
assumptions form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily available 
from independent, objective sources. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. Use of alternative assumptions may 
have resulted in significantly different estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Please refer to Note 1 — 
Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this report for a full discussion 
of our accounting policies, including estimates.
We have identified the following accounting estimates that, due to the difficult, subjective or complex judgments 
and assumptions inherent in those estimates and the potential sensitivity of the financial statements to those judgments and 
assumptions, are critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. We believe that the 
judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate.
Allowance for Loan Credit Losses. The allowance for loan credit losses (“ALCL”) represents the estimated losses 
for loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis. Expected losses are calculated using relevant information about past 
events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the 
collectability of the reported amount. We evaluate loans held for investment (“LHFI”) on a pool basis with pools of loans 
characterized by loan type, collateral, industry, internal credit risk rating and FICO score. The amount of the ALCL is 
affected by loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance, recoveries on loans previously charged off, which increase the 
allowance, as well as the provision for loan credit losses charged to income, which increases the allowance. In determining 
the provision for loan credit losses, management monitors fluctuations in the allowance resulting from actual charge-offs and 
recoveries and periodically reviews the size and composition of the loan portfolio in light of current and forecasted economic 
conditions. If actual losses exceed the amount of ALCL, it could materially and adversely affect our earnings. This evaluation 
is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes 
available. Credit losses are charged against the ALCL when management believes the loss is confirmed. 
52

Loan Acquisition Accounting. We account for our mergers/acquisitions under Accounting Standards Codification 
(“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable 
assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. The fair value for acquired loans at the time of acquisition or 
merger is based on a variety of factors, including discounted expected cash flows, adjusted for estimated prepayments and 
credit losses. In accordance with ASC 326, the fair value adjustment is recorded as premium or discount to the unpaid 
principal balance of each acquired loan. Loans that have been identified as having experienced a more-than-insignificant 
deterioration in credit quality since origination is a purchase credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loan. The net premium or discount 
on PCD loans is adjusted by the Company’s allowance for credit losses recorded at the time of merger/acquisition. The 
remaining net premium or discount is accreted or amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan using the 
effective interest rate method. The net premium or discount on loans that are not classified as PCD (“non-PCD”), that 
includes credit and non-credit components, is accreted or amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan 
using a constant yield method. We then record the necessary allowance for credit losses on the non-PCD loans through 
provision for loan credit losses expense.
General
We are a financial holding company headquartered in Ruston, Louisiana. Our wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Origin 
Bank, was founded in 1912 in Choudrant, Louisiana. Deeply rooted in our history is a culture committed to providing 
personalized, relationship banking to businesses, municipalities, and personal clients to enrich the lives of the people in the 
communities we serve. We provide a broad range of financial services and currently has over 60 locations from Dallas/Fort 
Worth, East Texas, Houston, across North Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and into the Florida Panhandle. As a 
financial holding company operating through one segment, we generate the majority of our revenue from interest earned on 
loans and investments, service charges and fees on deposit accounts.
We incur interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds and noninterest expense, such as salaries and 
employee benefits and occupancy expenses. We analyze our ability to maximize income generated from interest earning 
assets and expense of our liabilities through our net interest margin. Net interest margin is a ratio calculated as net interest 
income divided by average interest-earning assets. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-
earning assets, such as loans, securities and interest-bearing cash, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as 
deposits and borrowings. Net interest spread is the average yield on interest-earning assets minus the average rate on interest-
bearing liabilities.
Changes in market interest rates and the interest rates we earn on interest-earning assets or pay on interest-bearing 
liabilities, as well as in the volume and types of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing liabilities and 
stockholders’ equity, are usually the largest drivers of periodic changes in net interest spread, net interest margin and net 
interest income. Fluctuations in market interest rates are driven by many factors, including governmental monetary policies, 
inflation, deflation, macroeconomic developments, changes in unemployment, the money supply, political and international 
conditions and conditions in domestic and foreign financial markets. Periodic changes in the volume and types of loans in our 
loan portfolio are affected by, among other factors, economic and competitive conditions, as well as developments affecting 
the real estate, technology, financial services, insurance, transportation and manufacturing sectors within our target markets.
Results of Operations
The year ended December 31, 2024, was impacted by certain questioned activity involving a former banker which is 
explained in detail in Part II, Item 8, Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies under Loss Contingencies. These items 
negatively impacted our diluted EPS of $2.45 by $0.29 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
53

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2024
2023
2022
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 
$ 
87,715 
Financial ratios:
ROAA(1)
 0.77 %
 0.84 %
 1.01 %
ROAE(1)
 6.92 
 8.38 
 10.81 
Capital ratio:
Book value per common share
$ 
36.71 
$ 
34.30 
$ 
30.90 
____________________________
(1)
All average balances are calculated using average daily balances.
At and for the Years Ended December 31,
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $300.4 million, an increase of 809000, or 0.3%, 
compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily driven by a $50.5 million increase in interest 
income earned on LHFI and a $15.7 million decrease in interest expense incurred on Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) 
advance & other borrowings, offset by a $58.4 million increase in interest expense paid on interest-bearing deposits and a 
$6.5 million decrease in interest income earned on investment securities, during the year ended December 31, 2024, 
compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. 
Interest income earned on LHFI during the year ended December 31, 2024, increased in substantially all loan 
categories when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Interest income earned on real estate-based loans, mortgage 
warehouse lines of credit and commercial and industrial loans contributed $32.4 million, $10.1 million and $8.0 million, 
respectively, of the $50.5 million total increase in interest income earned on LHFI when compared to the year ended 
December 31, 2023. Increases in interest rates drove $17.9 million, $5.5 million and $2.8 million of the increase in interest 
income earned on real estate-based loans, commercial and industrial loans, and mortgage warehouse lines of credit, and 
increases in average loan balances drove $14.6 million, $7.3 million and $2.5 million of the increase in interest income 
earned on real estate-based loans, mortgage warehouse lines of credit and commercial and industrial loans for the comparable 
periods, respectively.
The increase in average rates and average balances of interest-bearing deposits during the year ended December 31, 
2024, contributed increases of $43.3 million and $15.1 million, respectively, to interest expense when compared to the year 
ended December 31, 2023. The average rate on interest-bearing deposits was 3.86% for the year ended December 31, 2024, 
an increase of 65 basis points, from 3.21% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in average balances of 
interest-bearing deposits was primarily driven by a $296.2 million increase in average money market deposit balances.
Lower average balances in investment securities contributed a decrease of $7.7 million in interest income and the 
decrease in average balance in FHLB advances and other borrowings contributed a decrease of $15.5 million in interest 
expense, during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, as a result of a strategic 
decision to sell available for sale securities to pay down borrowings and fund loan growth during the intervening period.
The Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) sets various benchmark rates, including the federal funds rate, and thereby 
influences the general market rates of interest, including the loan and deposit rates offered by financial institutions. On 
September 18, 2024, the FRB reduced the federal funds target rate range by 50 basis points, to a range of 4.75% to 5.00%, 
marking the first rate reduction since early 2020. Prior to this movement, the fed funds rate was at a 23-year high, reflecting a 
total federal funds target rate range increase of 525 basis points since the FRB started raising rates in early 2022 through the 
last federal funds target rate range increase in mid-2023. During the second half of 2024, the federal funds target range has 
decreased 100 basis points from its cycle high with the current federal funds target range set to 4.25% to 4.50% on December 
18, 2024. While the FRB has eased rates, the impact of higher interest rates for a sustained period of time continues to be 
reflected in our fully tax equivalent net interest margin (“NIM-FTE”) as well as in other financial metrics.
54

The NIM-FTE was 3.22% for the year ended December 31, 2024, a one basis point decrease from 3.23% for the 
year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to a 51-basis point increase in the rate paid on interest-
bearing liabilities to 3.88% for the year ended December 31, 2024, from 3.37% for year ended December 31, 2023, compared 
to a 42-basis point increase in the yield earned on interest-earning assets to 6.01% from 5.59%.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, we executed a bond portfolio optimization strategy aimed at 
enhancing long-term yields and improving overall portfolio performance. This strategy involved selling lower-yielding 
investment securities prior to their maturity and using the proceeds to purchase higher-yielding investments. As a result, we 
replaced securities with a total book value of $188.2 million and a weighted average yield of 1.51%, with new securities 
totaling $173.7 million with a weighted average yield of 5.22%, realizing a loss of $14.6 million. The weighted average 
duration of the securities portfolio increased to  4.46 years as of December 31, 2024, compared to 4.28 years as of December 
31, 2023. Due to the timing of this transaction, the optimization positively impacted our NIM-FTE by one basis point for the 
year ended December 31, 2024, while on an annual basis, the estimated positive impact in NIM-FTE is seven basis points. 
While the associated loss, net of the increase in interest income, resulted in a $0.35 negative impact to diluted EPS for the 
year ended December 31, 2024, we believe the trade-off in yield represents an attractive opportunity with an estimated 
increase in annual net interest income of $5.6 million and earn-back period of 2.4 years.
55

The following table presents average consolidated balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense and 
the corresponding average yields earned, and rates paid for the year ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. 
Commercial real estate
$ 2,485,800 
$ 146,507 
 5.89 %
$ 2,404,530 
$ 135,117 
 5.62 %
$ 1,951,246 
$ 88,175 
 4.52 %
Construction/land/land development
 1,035,871 
 
73,910 
 7.14 
 1,015,178 
 
69,630 
 6.86 
 
708,758 
 
36,352 
 5.13 
Residential real estate
 1,799,963 
 
98,732 
 5.49 
 1,629,589 
 
81,964 
 5.03 
 1,143,190 
 
49,635 
 4.34 
Commercial and industrial
 2,087,361 
 163,868 
 7.85 
 2,054,081 
 155,842 
 7.59 
 1,675,719 
 
90,499 
 5.40 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
420,665 
 
31,587 
 7.51 
 
314,079 
 
21,476 
 6.84 
 
420,639 
 
18,732 
 4.45 
Consumer
 
22,962 
 
1,819 
 7.92 
 
24,627 
 
1,918 
 7.79 
 
20,913 
 
1,444 
 6.91 
LHFI
 7,852,622 
 516,423 
 6.58 
 7,442,084 
 465,947 
 6.26 
 5,920,465 
 284,837 
 4.81 
Loans held for sale
 
13,306 
 
858 
 6.45 
 
18,055 
 
868 
 4.81 
 
32,272 
 
1,313 
 4.07 
Loans receivable
 7,865,928 
 517,281 
 6.58 
 7,460,139 
 466,815 
 6.26 
 5,952,737 
 286,150 
 4.81 
Investment securities-taxable
 1,045,520 
 
26,642 
 2.55 
 1,295,871 
 
31,682 
 2.44 
 1,497,226 
 
27,795 
 1.86 
Investment securities-non-taxable
 
146,815 
 
3,672 
 2.50 
 
214,232 
 
5,098 
 2.38 
 
270,701 
 
7,172 
 2.65 
Non-marketable equity securities held 
in other financial institutions
 
62,579 
 
2,417 
 3.86 
 
67,956 
 
3,408 
 5.01 
 
58,441 
 
1,802 
 3.08 
Interest-earning deposits in banks
 
279,945 
 
14,573 
 5.21 
 
318,559 
 
16,388 
 5.14 
 
349,484 
 
3,685 
 1.05 
Total interest-earning assets
 9,400,787 
 564,585 
 6.01 
 9,356,757 
 523,391 
 5.59 
 8,128,589 
 326,604 
 4.02 
Noninterest-earning assets
 
557,803 
 
584,263 
 
557,642 
Total assets
$ 9,958,590 
$ 9,941,020 
$ 8,686,231 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings and interest-bearing transaction 
accounts
$ 5,164,991 
$ 191,620 
 3.71 %
$ 4,725,929 
$ 144,324 
 3.05 %
$ 4,066,981 
$ 29,025 
 0.71 %
Time deposits
 1,444,954 
 
63,253 
 4.38 
 1,398,734 
 
52,133 
 3.73 
 
616,197 
 
4,484 
 0.73 
Total interest-bearing deposits
 6,609,945 
 254,873 
 3.86 
 6,124,663 
 196,457 
 3.21 
 4,683,178 
 
33,509 
 0.72 
FHLB advances & other borrowings
 
34,203 
 
1,602 
 4.68 
 
327,792 
 
17,258 
 5.26 
 
444,426 
 
9,411 
 2.12 
Subordinated indebtedness
 
161,232 
 
7,744 
 4.80 
 
198,856 
 
10,119 
 5.09 
 
176,028 
 
8,406 
 4.78 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 6,805,380 
 264,219 
 3.88 
 6,651,311 
 223,834 
 3.37 
 5,303,632 
 
51,326 
 0.97 
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits
 1,887,884 
 2,147,019 
 2,422,132 
Other liabilities
 
159,676 
 
142,786 
 
148,984 
Total liabilities
 8,852,940 
 8,941,116 
 7,874,748 
Stockholders’ Equity
 1,105,650 
 
999,904 
 
811,483 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ 
equity
$ 9,958,590 
$ 9,941,020 
$ 8,686,231 
Net interest spread
 2.13 %
 2.22 %
 3.05 %
Net interest income and margin
$ 300,366 
 3.20 
$ 299,557 
 3.20 
$ 275,278 
 3.39 
Net interest income and margin - (tax 
equivalent)(2)
$ 302,405 
 3.22 
$ 302,132 
 3.23 
$ 278,403 
 3.42 
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Average 
Balance(1)
Income/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Average 
Balance(1)
Income/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Average 
Balance(1)
Income/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
____________________________
(1)
Nonaccrual loans are included in their respective loan category for the purpose of calculating the yield earned. All average balances are daily average 
balances.
(2)
In order to present pre-tax income and resulting yields on tax-exempt investments comparable to those on taxable investments, a tax-equivalent 
adjustment has been computed. This adjustment also includes income tax credits received on Qualified School Construction Bonds and income from 
tax-exempt investments, and tax credits were computed using a federal income tax rate of 21%. 
56

Rate/Volume Analysis
The following tables present the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major 
components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to 
outstanding balances and those due to changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate changes has been 
determined by applying the change in rate between periods to average balances outstanding in the earlier period. The change 
in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier period to the change in average balances 
outstanding between periods. For purposes of the below table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be 
segregated, including the difference in day count, have been allocated to rate.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 vs. 
Year Ended December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Increase (Decrease) due to Change 
in
Loans:
Volume
Yield/Rate
Total Change
Commercial real estate
$ 
4,567 
$ 
6,823 
$ 
11,390 
Construction/land/land development
 
1,419 
 
2,861 
 
4,280 
Residential real estate
 
8,569 
 
8,199 
 
16,768 
Commercial and industrial
 
2,525 
 
5,501 
 
8,026 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
7,288 
 
2,823 
 
10,111 
Consumer
 
(130)  
31 
 
(99) 
Loans held for sale
 
(228)  
218 
 
(10) 
Loans receivable
 
24,010 
 
26,456 
 
50,466 
Investment securities-taxable
 
(6,121)  
1,081 
 
(5,040) 
Investment securities-non-taxable
 
(1,604)  
178 
 
(1,426) 
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions
 
(270)  
(721)  
(991) 
Interest-earning deposits in banks
 
(1,986)  
171 
 
(1,815) 
Total interest-earning assets
 
14,029 
 
27,165 
 
41,194 
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts
 
13,408 
 
33,888 
 
47,296 
Time deposits
 
1,723 
 
9,397 
 
11,120 
FHLB advances & other borrowings
 
(15,457)  
(199)  
(15,656) 
Subordinated indebtedness
 
(1,915)  
(460)  
(2,375) 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
(2,241)  
42,626 
 
40,385 
Net interest income
$ 
16,270 
$ 
(15,461) $ 
809 
57

Year Ended December 31, 2023 vs. Year Ended 
December 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Increase (Decrease) due to Change 
in
Loans:
Volume
Yield/Rate
Total Change
Commercial real estate
$ 
20,483 
$ 
26,459 
$ 
46,942 
Construction/land/land development
 
15,716 
 
17,562 
 
33,278 
Residential real estate
 
21,118 
 
11,211 
 
32,329 
Commercial and industrial
 
20,434 
 
44,909 
 
65,343 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
(4,745)  
7,489 
 
2,744 
Consumer
 
256 
 
218 
 
474 
Loans held for sale
 
(578)  
133 
 
(445) 
Loans receivable
 
72,684 
 
107,981 
 
180,665 
Investment securities-taxable
 
(3,738)  
7,625 
 
3,887 
Investment securities-non-taxable
 
(1,496)  
(578)  
(2,074) 
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions
 
293 
 
1,313 
 
1,606 
Interest-earning deposits in banks
 
(326)  
13,029 
 
12,703 
Total interest-earning assets
 
67,417 
 
129,370 
 
196,787 
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts
 
4,703 
 
110,596 
 
115,299 
Time deposits
 
5,694 
 
41,955 
 
47,649 
FHLB advances & other borrowings
 
(2,470)  
10,317 
 
7,847 
Subordinated indebtedness
 
1,090 
 
623 
 
1,713 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
9,017 
 
163,491 
 
172,508 
Net interest income
$ 
58,400 
$ 
(34,121) $ 
24,279 
Provision for Credit Losses
We recorded a provision expense of $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, a $9.3 million decrease 
from $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily driven by a $8.8 million decrease in the provision for 
loan credit losses.
The net decrease in provision expense for loan credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the 
year ended December 31, 2023, was mainly due to decreases of $8.5 million and $7.1 million in collectively and individually 
evaluated reserves, respectively, which decreases were offset by the $4.1 million provision increase associated with the 
questioned activity recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024, as discussed in detail in Part II, Item 8, Note 18 — 
Commitments and Contingencies under Loss Contingencies. 
During the period, we experienced a $6.7 million increase in net charge-offs. The increase in charge-offs was mainly 
driven by charge-offs relating to four commercial and industrial relationships totaling $15.2 million during the year ended 
December 31, 2024, compared to four commercial and industrial relationships totaling $6.8 million being the major driver for 
charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in charge-offs was partially offset by increase in 
recoveries on two commercial and industrial relationships totaling $4.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024.
58

Noninterest Income
The table below presents the various components of and changes in our noninterest income for the periods indicated.
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
Noninterest income: 
2024
2023
2022
$ Change
% Change
$ Change
% Change
Insurance commission and fee 
income
$ 
26,759 
$ 
25,085 
$ 
22,869 
$ 
1,674 
 6.7 % $ 
2,216 
 9.7 %
Service charges and fees
 
19,015 
 
18,803 
 
17,669 
 
212 
 1.1 
 
1,134 
 6.4 
Other fee income
 
8,917 
 
8,089 
 
7,279 
 
828 
 10.2 
 
810 
 11.1 
Mortgage banking revenue
 
6,580 
 
3,356 
 
6,722 
 
3,224 
 96.1 
 
(3,366) 
 (50.1) 
Swap fee income
 
323 
 
1,277 
 
457 
 
(954) 
 (74.7) 
 
820 
N/M
(Loss) gain on sales of securities, 
net
 
(14,799)  
(11,635)  
1,664 
 
(3,164) 
 27.2 
 
(13,299) 
N/M
Change in fair value of equity 
investments
 
5,188 
 
10,096 
 
— 
 
(4,908) 
 (48.6) 
 
10,096 
N/A
Other income
 
3,396 
 
3,264 
 
614 
 
132 
 4.0 
 
2,650 
N/M
Total noninterest income
$ 
55,379 
$ 
58,335 
$ 
57,274 
$ 
(2,956) 
 (5.1) 
$ 
1,061 
 1.9 
____________________________
N/M = Not meaningful.
N/A = Not applicable.
Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2024, decreased by $3.0 million, or 5.1%, to $55.4 million, 
compared to $58.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $4.9 
million in the change in fair value of equity investments and a $3.2 million increase in loss on sales of securities, net, partially 
offset by increases of $3.2 million and $1.7 million in mortgage banking revenue and insurance commission and fee income, 
respectively. 
Change in fair value of equity investments. The decrease in change in fair value of equity investments was primarily 
due to a $5.2 million positive valuation adjustment on a non-marketable equity security during the year ended December 31, 
2024, which was more than offset by a $10.1 million positive valuation adjustment on the same non-marketable equity 
security that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2023. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we 
observed multiple orderly transactions for this equity security indicating a price change had occurred and adjusted our basis 
upwards accordingly.
Mortgage banking revenue. The $3.2 million increase in mortgage banking revenue compared to the year ended 
December 31, 2023, was primarily driven by a $1.8 million increase in gain on sale of loans held for sale primarily due to 
higher profit margins and increased sales volume, and a net $1.3 million increase in mortgage banking revenue caused by 
$1.8 million MSR asset impairment recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023, which was offset by a $410,000 gain 
on sale of the MSR asset during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Loss on sales of securities, net. The $3.2 million increase in loss on sales of securities, net, was mainly driven by a 
$14.6 million loss recognized in the last quarter of 2024 as a result of our bond portfolio optimization strategy transaction. 
This was partially offset by a $11.8 million loss recognized in the second half of 2023, resulting from a strategic decision to 
use securities sale proceeds to pay down FHLB advances and support loan growth in our markets.
Insurance commission and fee income. The $1.7 million increase in insurance commission and fee income was 
mainly due to increases in both direct bill commission and contingency income. The increase in direct bill commission was 
mainly driven by higher commissions from property and casualty insurance. The increase in contingency income was mainly 
due to new commercial accounts combined with lower claims for catastrophic events experienced by our insurance agency 
counterparties during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
59

Noninterest Expense
The following table presents the significant components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
Noninterest expense:
2024
2023
2022
$ Change
% Change
$ Change
% Change
Salaries and employee benefits
$ 148,823 
$ 138,819 
$ 118,971 
$ 
10,004 
 7.2 % $ 
19,848 
 16.7 %
Occupancy and equipment, net
 
27,865 
 
26,783 
 
20,203 
 
1,082 
 4.0 
 
6,580 
 32.6 
Data processing
 
13,497 
 
11,590 
 
10,456 
 
1,907 
 16.5 
 
1,134 
 10.8 
Office and operations
 
11,441 
 
10,834 
 
8,120 
 
607 
 5.6 
 
2,714 
 33.4 
Intangible asset amortization
 
7,979 
 
9,628 
 
5,488 
 
(1,649) 
 (17.1) 
 
4,140 
 75.4 
Regulatory assessments
 
6,902 
 
6,456 
 
3,547 
 
446 
 6.9 
 
2,909 
 82.0 
Advertising and marketing
 
6,150 
 
5,986 
 
4,431 
 
164 
 2.7 
 
1,555 
 35.1 
Professional services
 
6,610 
 
5,931 
 
3,813 
 
679 
 11.4 
 
2,118 
 55.5 
Loan-related expenses
 
3,164 
 
5,035 
 
6,097 
 
(1,871) 
 (37.2) 
 
(1,062) 
 (17.4) 
Electronic banking
 
5,162 
 
4,712 
 
3,958 
 
450 
 9.6 
 
754 
 19.1 
Franchise tax expense
 
2,897 
 
3,334 
 
3,582 
 
(437) 
 (13.1) 
 
(248) 
 (6.9) 
Merger-related expense
 
— 
 
— 
 
6,171 
 
— 
N/A  
(6,171) 
 (100.0) 
Other expense
 
10,548 
 
6,108 
 
5,582 
 
4,440 
 72.7 
 
526 
 9.4 
Total noninterest expense
$ 251,038 
$ 235,216 
$ 200,419 
$ 
15,822 
 6.7 
$ 
34,797 
 17.4 
____________________________
N/A = Not applicable.
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2024, increased by $15.8 million, or 6.7%, to $251.0 million, 
compared to $235.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to increases of $10.0 million, $4.4 million 
$1.9 million and $1.1 million in salaries and employee benefits, other noninterest, data processing and occupancy and 
equipment, net expenses, respectively. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $1.9 million and $1.6 million in 
loan-related expenses and intangible asset amortization, respectively. 
Salaries and employee benefits. The $10.0 million increase in salaries and employee benefits expense was primarily 
driven by increases of $6.6 million, $2.0 million, $1.7 million, and $1.5 million in salary expense, incentive compensation 
bonus, share-based compensation, and medical insurance expenses respectively. The increase was partially offset by an 
employee retention credit (“ERC”) of 1.7 million that was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, and related to 
the operations of BTH Bank, N.A., which we acquired in 2022. The ERC is a refundable tax credit for certain eligible 
businesses that had employees affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in salary expense was mainly 
attributed to raises given as a result of our annual salary reviews combined with an increase driven by our entry into South 
Alabama and the Florida Panhandle markets during 2024. The increase in incentive compensation bonuses can be attributed 
primarily to elevated anticipated payouts, driven by a greater focus on meeting deposit objectives. This is evidenced by a 
larger sum of incentives linked to these deposit goals, alongside an increase in accruals associated with financial targets for 
the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in share-based 
compensation was primarily due to evaluation adjustments on performance stock units to align with payout expectations 
based on company performance. Medical insurance expense increased as a result of higher insurance premiums combined 
with higher self-insurance claims during the current period. 
Other noninterest expense. The $4.4 million increase in other noninterest expense was primarily due to $4.3 million 
in contingency expense related to certain questioned activity involving a former banker in our East Texas market, as 
explained in detail in Part II, Item 8, Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies under Loss Contingencies.
Data Processing. The $1.9 million increase in data processing expense was primarily due to an increase of 
$1.1 million in software expenses, primarily driven by new services and increased fees for the year ended December 31, 
2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Also, contributing a combined increase of $749,000 were increased 
expenses associated with core services, compliance systems and data processing costs.
60

Occupancy and equipment, net. The $1.1 million increase in occupancy and equipment, net was primarily due to an 
increase in expense associated with the accounting for our strategic profitability initiative which includes consolidation of 
eight banking centers, five in the Dallas-Fort Worth market, with one each in the Houston, Louisiana and Mississippi 
markets. We expect to close six of these banking centers at the end of February 2025, which combined with the two branch 
closures that occurred mid-year 2024, is expected to reduce our occupancy expense by approximately 4.6 million annually.
Loan-related expenses. The $1.9 million decrease in loan-related expenses was primarily due to decreases of 
$675,000 and $630,000 in loan related legal fees and servicing costs, respectively. 
Intangible asset amortization. The $1.6 million decrease in intangible asset amortization is primarily due to the 
accelerated amortization method used to measure the amortization expense of the assets, as well as certain intangible assets 
that were fully amortized during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Income Tax Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized income tax expense of $20.8 million, compared to $22.1 
million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our effective tax rate was 21.4% for the year ended December 31, 2024, 
compared to 20.9% for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023
General
Total assets decreased by $43.9 million, or 0.5%, to $9.68 billion at December 31, 2024, from $9.72 billion at 
December 31, 2023. The decrease in total assets is primarily due to decreases of 151.1 million and $87.2 million in available 
for sale securities and LHFI, respectively. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $189.8 million in cash and 
cash equivalents. LHFI were $7.57 billion at December 31, 2024, a decrease of 1.1%, compared to $7.66 billion at December 
31, 2023. Available for sale securities declined to $1.10 billion, reflecting a 12.1% decrease, at December 31, 2024, 
compared to $1.25 billion at December 31, 2023. Cash and cash equivalents increased to $470.2 million, an increase of 
67.7%, at December 31, 2024, compared to $280.4 million at December 31, 2023.
Total liabilities decreased by 126.2 million, or 1.5%, to 9 billion at December 31, 2024, from 9 billion at December 
31, 2023. Federal Home Loan Bank advances, repurchase obligations and other borrowings decreased 71.1 million, or 85.1%, 
to 12.5 million at December 31, 2024, from 83.6 million at December 31, 2023. Subordinated debentures decreased 34.3 
million, or 17.7%, to 159.9 million at December 31, 2024, from 194.3 million at December 31, 2023. Total deposits 
decreased by $28.0 million, or 0.3%, to $8.22 billion at December 31, 2024, from $8.25 billion at December 31, 2023, 
primarily due to a decrease of 364.8 million in brokered deposits, which was partially offset by increases of 184.6 million and 
$157.9 million and interest-bearing demand and money market deposits, respectively. 
Loan Portfolio
Our loan portfolio is our largest category of interest-earning assets, and interest income earned on our loan portfolio 
is our primary source of income. At December 31, 2024, 75.2% of the loan portfolio held for investment was comprised of 
commercial and industrial loans, including mortgage warehouse lines of credit, commercial real estate and construction/land/
land development loans, which were primarily originated within our legacy market areas of Texas, North Louisiana, and 
Mississippi, compared to 77.1% at December 31, 2023.
61

The following table presents the ending balance of our loan portfolio held for investment at the dates indicated.
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
2024 vs. 2023
Real estate:
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
$ Change
% Change
Commercial real estate (“CRE”)(1)
$ 2,477,431 
 32.7 % $ 2,442,734 
 31.9 % $ 
34,697 
 1.4 %
Construction/land/land development
 
864,011 
 11.4 
 
1,070,225 
 14.0 
 
(206,214) 
 (19.3) 
Residential real estate
 
1,857,589 
 24.5 
 
1,734,935 
 22.6 
 
122,654 
 7.1 
Total real estate
 
5,199,031 
 68.6 
 
5,247,894 
 68.5 
 
(48,863) 
 (0.9) 
Commercial and industrial
 
2,002,634 
 26.5 
 
2,059,460 
 26.9 
 
(56,826) 
 (2.8) 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
349,081 
 4.6 
 
329,966 
 4.3 
 
19,115 
 5.8 
Consumer
 
22,967 
 0.3 
 
23,624 
 0.3 
 
(657) 
 (2.8) 
Total LHFI
$ 7,573,713 
 100.0 % $ 7,660,944 
 100.0 % $ 
(87,231) 
 (1.1) 
______________________
(1)
Includes owner-occupied CRE of $975.9 million and $953.8 million at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
At December 31, 2024, total LHFI were $7.57 billion, a decrease of $87.2 million, or 1.1%, compared to $7.66 
billion at December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline of $206.2 million in construction/land/land 
development loans, which was partially offset by an increase of $122.7 million in residential real estate loans. Total LHFI at 
December 31, 2024, excluding mortgage warehouse lines of credit, were $7.22 billion, reflecting a decrease of $106.3 
million, or 1.5%, compared to December 31, 2023. 
A significant portion, 32.7%, of our LHFI portfolio at December 31, 2024, consisted of CRE loans secured by real 
estate properties. Such loans can involve high principal loan amounts, and the repayment of these loans is dependent, in large 
part, on a borrower’s ongoing business operations or on income generated from the properties that are leased to third parties. 
The table below sets forth the CRE loan portfolio, by portfolio industry sector and collateral location as of 
December 31, 2024.
(Dollars in thousands)
Texas
Louisiana 
Mississippi
All Other States
Total
Non-owner occupied CRE:
Office building
$ 
276,409 
$ 
22,101 
$ 
34,535 $ 
17,930 
$ 
350,975 
Retail shopping
 
251,607 
 
39,501 
 
33,156  
92,508 
 
416,772 
Real estate & construction
 
165,801 
 
50,533 
 
5,406  
39,993 
 
261,733 
Healthcare
 
71,378 
 
45,065 
 
5,734  
27,131 
 
149,308 
Hotels
 
3,348 
 
50,656 
 
35,095  
9,246 
 
98,345 
All other sectors
 
145,493 
 
11,865 
 
9,184  
57,809 
 
224,351 
Total non-owner occupied CRE
 
914,036 
 
219,721 
 
123,110  
244,617 
 
1,501,484 
Owner occupied CRE:
Real estate & construction
 
173,736 
 
46,545 
 
17,357  
13,714 
 
251,352 
Retail shopping
 
121,840 
 
15,380 
 
643  
1,812 
 
139,675 
Consumer Services
 
45,474 
 
15,076 
 
257  
— 
 
60,807 
Entertainment & Recreation
 
37,562 
 
22,954 
 
10,167  
— 
 
70,683 
All other sectors
 
252,176 
 
120,035 
 
25,665  
55,554 
 
453,430 
Total owner occupied CRE
 
630,788 
 
219,990 
 
54,089  
71,080 
 
975,947 
Total CRE loans
$ 
1,544,824 
$ 
439,711 
$ 
177,199 $ 
315,697 
$ 
2,477,431 
December 31, 2024
62

Loan Portfolio Maturity Analysis
The table below presents the maturity distribution of our LHFI at December 31, 2024. The table also presents the 
portion of our loans that have fixed interest rates, rather than interest rates that fluctuate over the life of the loans, based on 
changes in the interest rate environment.
(Dollars in thousands)
One Year 
or Less 
After One 
Year 
Through Five 
Years 
After Five
Years
Through
Fifteen Years
After Fifteen
Years
Total
Real estate:
Commercial real estate
$ 
410,216 
$ 
1,768,831 
$ 
287,801 
$ 
10,583 
$ 
2,477,431 
Construction/land/land development
 
333,071 
 
471,091 
 
40,870 
 
18,979 
 
864,011 
Residential real estate
 
226,142 
 
729,610 
 
71,963 
 
829,874 
 
1,857,589 
Total real estate
 
969,429 
 
2,969,532 
 
400,634 
 
859,436 
 
5,199,031 
Commercial and industrial
 
816,912 
 
1,099,521 
 
86,114 
 
87 
 
2,002,634 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
349,081 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
349,081 
Consumer
 
8,025 
 
14,048 
 
402 
 
492 
 
22,967 
Total LHFI
$ 
2,143,447 
$ 
4,083,101 
$ 
487,150 
$ 
860,015 
$ 
7,573,713 
Amounts with fixed rates
$ 
493,594 
$ 
2,141,510 
$ 
313,901 
$ 
186,192 
$ 
3,135,197 
Amounts with variable rates
 
1,649,853 
 
1,941,591 
 
173,249 
 
673,823 
 
4,438,516 
Total
$ 
2,143,447 
$ 
4,083,101 
$ 
487,150 
$ 
860,015 
$ 
7,573,713 
December 31, 2024
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming/nonaccrual loans and property acquired through foreclosures or 
repossession, as well as bank-owned property not in use and listed for sale.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when management believes that the borrower’s financial condition, after 
giving consideration to economic and business conditions, and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful, 
or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status even if the contractual 
payments are not past due if information becomes available that causes substantial doubt about the borrower’s ability to meet 
the contractual obligations of the loan. When accrual of interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Past 
due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized to the extent 
cash payments are received, but payments received are usually applied to principal. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual 
status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably 
assured. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible, regardless of size, the portion of the loan determined to 
be uncollectible is then charged to the ALCL.
Purchased loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination are purchased 
credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. The Company evaluates acquired loans for deterioration in credit quality based on any of, 
but not limited to, the following: (1) nonaccrual status; (2) borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty which results in 
modification to the loan terms; (3) risk ratings of special mention, substandard or doubtful; (4) watchlist credits; and (5) 
delinquency status, including loans that are current on merger/acquisition date, but had previously been 60 days delinquent 
twice. An allowance for credit losses is determined using the same methodology as other individually evaluated loans. 
Subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recorded through the provision for credit losses. We held 
approximately $12.3 million of unpaid principal balance PCD loans at December 31, 2024, and $34.8 million of unpaid 
principal balance PCD loans at December 31, 2023.
We manage the quality of our lending portfolio in part through a disciplined underwriting policy and through 
continual monitoring of loan performance and borrowers’ financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that our 
loan portfolio will not become subject to losses due to declines in economic conditions or deterioration in the financial 
condition of our borrowers.
63

The following table shows our nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming LHFI:
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Commercial real estate
$ 
4,974 
$ 
786 
Construction/land/land development
 
18,505 
 
305 
Residential real estate
 
36,221 
 
13,037 
Commercial and industrial
 
15,120 
 
15,897 
Consumer
 
182 
 
90 
Total nonperforming LHFI
 
75,002 
 
30,115 
Other real estate owned:
Commercial real estate, construction/land/land development
 
1,340 
 
3,068 
Residential real estate
 
1,261 
 
846 
Former Bank premises
 
1,034 
 
— 
Total other real estate owned
 
3,635 
 
3,914 
Other repossessed assets owned
 
— 
 
15 
Total repossessed assets owned
 
3,635 
 
3,929 
Total nonperforming assets
$ 
78,637 
$ 
34,044 
Total LHFI
$ 
7,573,713 
$ 
7,660,944 
Ratio of nonperforming LHFI to total LHFI
 0.99 %
 0.39 %
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets
 0.81 
 0.35 
As explained in detail in Part II, Item 8, Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies under Loss Contingencies, our 
credit metrics were negatively impacted by certain questioned activity involving a former banker in our East Texas market. 
Our investigation of this activity remains ongoing and is not final. The Company continues to work with a third-party 
forensic accounting team to confirm the Bank’s identification and reconciliation of the activity, and also to assist in 
evaluating any additional impact from the questioned activity. At this time, we believe that any ultimate loss arising from the 
situation will not be material to our financial position.
Nonperforming LHFI increased $44.9 million at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, and 
nonperforming LHFI to LHFI increased to 0.99% compared to 0.39%. The $44.9 million increase in non-performing loans 
was primarily driven by one loan relationship totaling $29.0 million impacted by the questioned loan activity mentioned 
above. Also contributing to the increase in nonperforming LHFI at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, 
were three residential real estate loan relationships totaling $9.7 million. Please see Note 4 — Loans to our consolidated 
financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report for more information on nonperforming loans. 
The steep incline in the interest rate environment over the last several years driven by the FRB’s federal funds rate 
setting policy, as outlined in the Results of Operations section above, has negatively impacted borrowers with variable or 
floating rate loans causing their cost of borrowings to increase significantly since mid-2022. This has put pressure on 
borrower’s cash flow and contributed to higher overall nonperforming loans at December 31, 2024, compared to December 
31, 2023.
64

Potential Problem Loans
From a credit risk standpoint, we classify loans using risk grades which fall into one of five categories: pass, special 
mention, substandard, doubtful or loss. The classifications of loans reflect a judgment about the risks of default and loss 
associated with the loan. We review the ratings on loans and adjust them to reflect the degree of risk and loss that is felt to be 
inherent or expected in each loan. The methodology is structured so that reserve allocations are increased in accordance with 
deterioration in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance with improvement in 
credit quality (and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss). Loans rated special mention reflect borrowers who exhibit 
credit weaknesses or downward trends deserving close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in 
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the bank’s credit position at some future date. While potentially 
weak these borrowers currently do not pose sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Loans rated substandard are those 
borrowers with deteriorating trends and well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of debt. A 
substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral 
pledged, if any. Normal repayment from the borrower might be in jeopardy.
Loans rated as doubtful have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the 
weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full questionable, and there is a high probability of loss based on currently 
existing facts, conditions and values. Loans classified as loss are charged-off and we have low expectations for the recovery 
of any payments in respect to loans rated as loss. Information regarding the internal risk ratings of our loans at December 31, 
2024, is included in Note 4 — Loans to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Allowance for Loan Credit Losses
The ALCL represents the estimated losses for loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis. Expected losses are 
calculated using relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable 
and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. We evaluate LHFI on a pool basis with pools 
of loans characterized by loan type, collateral, industry, internal credit risk rating and FICO score. We applied a probability 
of default, loss given default loss methodology to the loan pools at December 31, 2024. Historical loss rates for each pool are 
calculated based on charge-off and recovery data beginning with the second quarter of 2012. These loss rates are adjusted for 
the effects of certain economic variables forecast over a one-year period, particularly for differences between current period 
conditions and the conditions existing during the historical loss period. Subsequent to the forecast effects, historical loss rates 
are used to estimate losses over the estimated remaining lives of the loans. The estimated remaining lives consist of the 
contractual lives, adjusted for estimated prepayments. Loans that exhibit characteristics different from their pool 
characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Certain of these loans are considered to be collateral dependent, with the 
borrower experiencing financial difficulty. For these loans, the fair value of collateral practical expedient is elected whereby 
the allowance is calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost exceeds the fair value of collateral, less costs to sell (if 
applicable). Those individual loans that are not collateral dependent are evaluated based on a discounted cash flow 
methodology.
The amount of the ALCL is affected by loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance, recoveries on loans 
previously charged off, which increase the allowance, as well as the provision for loan credit losses charged to income, which 
increases the allowance. In determining the provision for loan credit losses, management monitors fluctuations in the 
allowance resulting from actual charge-offs and recoveries and periodically reviews the size and composition of the loan 
portfolio in light of current and forecasted economic conditions. If actual losses exceed the amount of the ALCL, it would 
materially and adversely affect our earnings.
Acquisition Accounting and Acquired Loans. We account for our mergers/acquisitions under Financial Accounting 
Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of 
accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. In accordance with ASC 326, we 
record a discount or premium, and also an allowance for credit losses on acquired loans. All purchased loans are recorded at 
fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The 
fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of 
undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.
Purchased loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination are PCD loans. 
An ALCL is determined using the same methodology as other individually evaluated loans. The sum of the loan’s purchase 
price and allowance for credit losses becomes its initial amortized cost basis. The difference between the initial amortized 
cost basis and the par value of the loan is a non-credit discount or premium, which is amortized or accreted into interest 
income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the ALCL are recorded through the provision for credit losses.
65

As a general rule, when it becomes evident that the full principal and accrued interest of a loan may not be collected, 
or at 90 days past due, we will reflect that loan as nonperforming. It will remain nonperforming until it performs in a manner 
that it is reasonable to expect that we will collect principal and accrued interest in full. When the amount or likelihood of a 
loss on a loan has been confirmed, a charge-off will be taken in the period it is determined.
We establish general allocations for each major loan category and credit quality. The general allocation is based, in 
part, on historical charge-off experience and loss given default methodology, derived from our internal risk rating process. 
Other adjustments may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on 
credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data. We give consideration to trends, changes in 
loan mix, delinquencies, prior losses, reasonable and supportable forecasts and other related information.
In connection with the review of our loan portfolio, we consider risk elements attributable to particular loan types or 
categories in assessing the quality of individual loans. Some of the risk elements we consider include:
•
for commercial real estate loans, the debt service coverage ratio, operating results of the owner in the case of 
owner-occupied properties, the loan to value ratio, the age and condition of the collateral and the volatility of 
income, property value and future operating results typical of properties of that type;
•
for construction, land and land development loans, the perceived feasibility of the project, including the ability 
to sell developed lots or improvements constructed for resale or the ability to lease property constructed for 
lease, the quality and nature of contracts for presale or prelease, if any, experience and ability of the developer 
and loan to value ratio;
•
for residential mortgage loans, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the debt to 
income ratio and employment and income stability, the loan-to-value ratio, and the age, condition and 
marketability of the collateral; and
•
for commercial and industrial loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the business in excess of 
operating expenses compared to loan repayment requirements), the operating results of the commercial, 
industrial or professional enterprise, the borrower’s business, professional and financial ability and expertise, 
the specific risks and volatility of income and operating results typical for businesses in that category and the 
value, nature and marketability of collateral.
•
for mortgage warehouse loans, the borrower’s adherence to agency or investor underwriting guidelines, while 
the risk associated with the underlying consumer mortgage loan repayments, similar to other consumer loans, 
depends on the borrower’s financial stability and are more likely than commercial loans to be adversely affected 
by divorce, job loss, illness and other personal hardships.
The following table presents the allowance for credit loss by loan category:
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Loans secured by real estate:
Amount
%(1)
Amount
%(1)
Commercial real estate
$ 
16,546 
 32.7 % $ 
19,625 
 31.9 %
Construction/land/land development
 
7,398 
 11.4 
 
9,990 
 14.0 
Residential real estate
 
12,454 
 24.5 
 
10,619 
 22.6 
Commercial and industrial
 
53,449 
 26.5 
 
55,330 
 26.9 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
501 
 4.6 
 
529 
 4.3 
Consumer
 
712 
 0.3 
 
775 
 0.3 
Total
$ 
91,060 
 100.0 % $ 
96,868 
 100.0 %
___________________________
(1)
Represents the ratio of each loan type to total LHFI.
Our ALCL decreased by $5.8 million, or 6.0%, to $91.1 million at December 31, 2024, from $96.9 million at 
December 31, 2023. Changes in qualitative factors across the Company's risk pools drove a $2.6 million decline in the 
ALCL, driven primarily by an improved economic outlook, including lower interest rate pressures and stabilizing market 
conditions. The allowance for individually evaluated loans contributing another $2.7 million of the decrease for the year 
ended December 31, 2024, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The ratio of ALCL to total LHFI decreased 
to 1.20% at December 31, 2024, compared to 1.26% at December 31, 2023.  
66

The following table presents an analysis of the ALCL and other related data at the periods indicated.
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
ALCL
2024
2023
Balance at beginning of year
$ 
96,868 
$ 
87,161 
Provision for loan credit losses
 
8,680 
 
17,514 
Charge-offs:
Commercial real estate
 
480 
 
42 
Residential real estate
 
11 
 
27 
Commercial and industrial
 
22,787 
 
11,833 
Consumer
 
362 
 
147 
Total charge-offs
 
23,640 
 
12,049 
Recoveries:
Commercial real estate
 
530 
 
140 
Construction/land/land development
 
— 
 
3 
Residential real estate
 
16 
 
17 
Commercial and industrial
 
8,583 
 
4,068 
Consumer
 
23 
 
14 
Total recoveries
 
9,152 
 
4,242 
Net charge-offs
 
14,488 
 
7,807 
Balance at end of year
$ 
91,060 
$ 
96,868 
Ratio of ALCL to:
Nonperforming LHFI
 121.41 %
 321.66 %
LHFI
 1.20 
 1.26 
Net charge-offs as a percentage of:
Provision for loan credit losses
 166.91 
 44.58 
ALCL
 15.91 
 8.06 
Average LHFI
 0.18 
 0.10 
The ALCL to nonperforming LHFI decreased to 121.41% at December 31, 2024, compared to 321.66% at 
December 31, 2023, primarily driven by a $44.9 million increase in nonperforming LHFI at December 31, 2024. Past due 
loans to total LHFI increased to 0.56% at December 31, 2024, compared to 0.34% at December 31, 2023. 
67

Securities
Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a significant source of 
revenue. We use the securities portfolio to provide a source of liquidity, provide an appropriate return on funds invested, 
manage interest rate risk and meet collateral as well as regulatory capital requirements. We manage the securities portfolio to 
optimize returns while maintaining an appropriate level of risk. Securities within the portfolio are classified as either held-to-
maturity, available-for-sale or at fair value through income, based on the intent and objective of the investment and the ability 
to hold to maturity. Unrealized gains and losses arising in the available for sale portfolio as a result of changes in the fair 
value of the securities are reported on an after-tax basis as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in 
stockholders’ equity while securities classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost. For further discussion of the 
valuation components and classification of investment securities, see Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies to our 
consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Our securities portfolio totaled $1.12 billion at December 31, 2024, representing a decrease of $151.9 million, or 
11.9%, from $1.27 billion at December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to sales, maturities and calls, as well as 
normal principal paydowns, which was partially offset by purchases and a decrease in unrealized losses during the year ended 
December 31, 2024. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we executed a bond portfolio optimization strategy aimed at 
enhancing long-term yields and improving overall portfolio performance. As a result, we replaced securities with a total book 
value of $188.2 million and a weighted average yield of 1.51% with new securities totaling $173.7 million with a weighted 
average yield of 5.22%, realizing a loss of $14.6 million. During the second half of 2023, we sold available for sale 
investment securities with total book value of $260.8 million and realized total loss of $11.8 million, the proceeds of which 
were used to pay down FHLB advances and support loan operations.
Our available for sale portfolio totaled $1.10 billion at December 31, 2024, which represented 98.4% of our total 
security portfolio and is comprised of 53.0% mortgage-backed, 23.2% municipal, 1.3% treasury/agency, 15.4% collateralized 
mortgage obligations and 7.1% corporate/asset-backed securities. Our available for sale portfolio totaled $1.25 billion at 
December 31, 2023, which represented 98.6% of our total security portfolio, and was comprised of 47.8% mortgage-backed, 
22.5% municipal, 6.4% treasury/agency, 13.2% collateralized mortgage obligations and 10.1% corporate/asset-backed 
securities.
The securities portfolio had a weighted average effective duration of  4.46 years at December 31, 2024, compared to 
4.28 years at December 31, 2023. For additional information regarding our securities portfolio, please see Note 3 — 
Securities to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
The following table sets forth the composition of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Available for sale:
Carrying 
Amount
% of Total
Carrying 
Amount
% of Total
State and municipal securities
$ 
255,976 
 23.2 % $ 
282,126 
 22.5 %
Corporate bonds
 
78,236 
 7.1 
 
83,635 
 6.7 
U.S. treasury and government agency securities
 
13,805 
 1.3 
 
79,640 
 6.4 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
44,284 
 4.0 
 
93,396 
 7.5 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
540,834 
 49.0 
 
506,502 
 40.3 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
28,566 
 2.6 
 
35,183 
 2.8 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
140,827 
 12.8 
 
130,144 
 10.4 
Asset-backed securities
 
— 
 — 
 
43,005 
 3.4 
Total
$ 
1,102,528 
 100.0 % $ 
1,253,631 
 100.0 %
Held to maturity:
State and municipal securities, net of allowance
$ 
11,095 
$ 
11,615 
Securities carried at fair value through income:
State and municipal securities
$ 
6,512 
$ 
6,808 
68

The following table presents the fair value of securities available for sale and amortized cost of securities held to 
maturity and their corresponding yields at December 31, 2024. The securities are grouped by contractual maturity and use 
amortized cost for all yield calculations. Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed 
securities, which do not have contractual payments due at a single maturity date, are shown at the date the last underlying 
mortgage matures.
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
Within One Year
After One Year 
but Within Five 
Years
After Five Years 
but Within Ten 
Years
After Ten Years
Total
Available for sale:
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
State and municipal 
securities (1)
$ 
2,189 
 2.67 % $ 
33,823 
 1.80 % $ 107,550  2.31 % $ 112,414 
 2.37 % $ 
255,976 
 2.27 %
Corporate bonds
 
— 
 — 
 
7,617 
 7.62 
 70,195 
 4.71 
 
424 
 4.50 
 
78,236 
 4.99 
U.S. treasury and 
government agency 
securities
 
299 
 3.00 
 
78 
 7.60 
 10,148 
 5.15 
 
3,280 
 1.53 
 
13,805 
 4.26 
Commercial mortgage-
backed securities
 
— 
 — 
 
26,646 
 1.44 
 17,638 
 2.18 
 
— 
 — 
 
44,284 
 1.73 
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
 
26 
 3.21 
 
1,702 
 2.75 
 12,307 
 2.71 
 
526,799 
 2.77 
 
540,834 
 2.77 
Commercial 
collateralized mortgage 
obligations
 
— 
 — 
 
9,964 
 3.68 
 16,079 
 2.45 
 
2,523 
 4.93 
 
28,566 
 3.10 
Residential 
collateralized mortgage 
obligations
 
— 
 — 
 
— 
 — 
 
8,534 
 2.85 
 
132,293 
 2.66 
 
140,827 
 2.67 
Total securities 
available for sale
$ 
2,514 
 2.71 
$ 
79,830 
 2.50 
$ 242,451  3.16 
$ 777,733 
 2.70 
$ 1,102,528 
 2.78 
Held to maturity:
State and municipal 
securities (1)
 
— 
 — 
 
5,153 
 6.35 
 
5,992 
 2.50 
 
— 
 2.50 
 
11,145 
 4.28 
Securities carried at fair 
value through income:
State and municipal 
securities (1)
 
— 
 — 
 
— 
 — 
 
— 
 — 
 
6,512 
 4.51 
 
6,512 
 4.51 
Total
$ 
2,514 
 2.71 
$ 
84,983 
 2.73 
$ 248,443  3.14 
$ 784,245 
 2.72 
$ 1,120,185 
 2.80 
____________________________
(1)
Tax-exempt security yields are calculated without consideration of their tax benefit status.
The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations is not a reliable 
indicator of their expected life because borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations at any time. Mortgage-backed 
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are typically issued with stated principal amounts and are backed by pools 
of mortgage loans and other loans with varying maturities. The term of the underlying mortgages and loans may vary 
significantly due to the ability of a borrower to prepay outstanding amounts. Monthly pay downs on mortgage-backed 
securities tend to cause the average life of the securities to be much different from the stated contractual maturity. During a 
period of decreasing interest rates, fixed rate mortgage-backed securities tend to experience higher prepayments of principal, 
which can significantly shorten the estimated average life of these securities. As interest rates continue to fall, prepayments 
activity may increase further, thereby accelerating the reduction in the estimated average life of these securities.
 All of our mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. 
government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored entities. Other than securities issued by government agencies or 
government sponsored enterprises, we did not own securities of any one issuer for which aggregate cost exceeded 10.0% of 
our consolidated stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2024 or 2023. Additionally, we do not hold any Fannie Mae or 
Freddie Mac preferred stock, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles or second lien elements in the 
investment portfolio, nor does the investment portfolio contain any securities that are directly backed by subprime or Alt-A 
mortgages.
69

Securities Carried at Fair Value through Income
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, we held one fixed rate community investment bond of $6.5 million and 
$6.8 million, respectively. We elected the fair value option on this security to offset corresponding changes in the fair value 
of related interest rate swap agreements.
Deposits
Deposits are the primary funding source used to fund our loans, investments and operating needs. We offer a variety 
of products designed to attract and retain both consumer and commercial deposit customers. These products consist of 
noninterest and interest-bearing checking accounts, savings deposits, money market accounts and time deposits. Deposits are 
primarily gathered from individuals, partnerships and corporations in our market areas. We also obtain deposits from local 
municipalities and state agencies. 
Total deposits remained relatively flat at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, with increases of 
$184.6 million, $157.9 million, and $40.1 million in interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings deposits, 
respectively, being offset by decreases of $364.8 million and $26.9 million in brokered and time deposits. Typically, higher 
market interest rates and sustained inflation will cause customers to move liquid asset balances into higher interest-earning 
vehicles such as money market funds.
The following table presents our deposit mix at the dates indicated:
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance
% of Total
Balance
% of Total
$ Change
% Change
Noninterest-bearing demand
$ 
1,900,651 
 23.1 % $ 
1,919,638 
 23.3 % $ 
(18,987) 
 (1.0) %
Money market
 
2,930,710 
 35.6 
 
2,772,807 
 33.6 
 
157,903 
 5.7 
Interest-bearing demand
 
2,060,463 
 25.1 
 
1,875,864 
 22.7 
 
184,599 
 9.8 
Time deposits
 
941,000 
 11.4 
 
967,901 
 11.7 
 
(26,901) 
 (2.8) 
Brokered deposits(1)
 
80,226 
 1.0 
 
444,989 
 5.4 
 
(364,763) 
 (82.0) 
Savings
 
310,070 
 3.8 
 
269,926 
 3.3 
 
40,144 
 14.9 
Total deposits
$ 
8,223,120 
 100.0 % $ 
8,251,125 
 100.0 % $ 
(28,005) 
 (0.3) 
_____________________
(1)
At December 31, 2024, brokered deposits included brokered time deposits and brokered interest-bearing demand of $79.99 million and $236,000, 
respectively. At December 31, 2023, brokered deposits included brokered time deposits of $445.0 million.
We manage our interest expense on deposits through specific deposit product pricing that is based on competitive 
pricing, economic conditions and current and anticipated funding needs. We may use interest rates as a mechanism to attract 
or deter additional deposits based on our anticipated funding needs and liquidity position. We also consider potential interest 
rate risk caused by extended maturities of time deposits when setting the interest rates in periods of future economic 
uncertainty.
70

The following table reflects the classification of our average deposits and the average rate paid on each deposit 
category for the periods indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
Average 
Balance
Interest 
Expense
Average
Rate 
Paid
Average 
Balance
Interest 
Expense
Average
Rate 
Paid
Average 
Balance
Interest 
Expense
Average 
Rate 
Paid
Interest-bearing demand
$ 1,863,361 $ 63,291 
 3.40 % $ 1,788,423 $ 50,033 
 2.80 % $ 1,545,581 $ 11,007 
 0.71 %
Money market
 2,942,691  119,533 
 4.06 
 2,646,447  
91,685 
 3.46 
 2,233,390  
17,501 
 0.78 
Time deposits
 1,004,934  
39,634 
 3.94 
 928,694  
27,892 
 3.00 
 611,195  
4,476 
 0.73 
Brokered deposits(1)
 509,434  
27,321 
 5.36 
 470,040  
24,241 
 5.16 
 
5,002  
8 
 0.16 
Savings
 289,525  
5,094 
 1.76 
 291,059  
2,606 
 0.90 
 288,010  
517 
 0.18 
Total interest-bearing
 6,609,945  254,873 
 3.86 
 6,124,663  196,457 
 3.21 
 4,683,178  
33,509 
 0.72 
Noninterest-bearing demand  1,887,884  
— 
 2,147,019  
— 
 2,422,132  
— 
Total average deposits
$ 8,497,829 $ 254,873 
 3.00 
$ 8,271,682 $ 196,457 
 2.38 
$ 7,105,310 $ 33,509 
 0.47 
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
______________________
(1)
Average brokered deposits include average brokered time deposits and average brokered interest-bearing demand of $440.0 million and $69.4 million, 
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2024. Average brokered deposits included average brokered time deposits of $470.0 million and $5.0 
million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Our average deposit balances were $8.50 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $226.1 
million, or 2.7%, from $8.27 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023. The average rate paid on our interest-bearing 
deposits for the year ended December 31, 2024, was 3.86%, compared to 3.21% for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
The increase in the average cost of our deposits was primarily the result of the rapidly rising interest rate 
environment experienced since March 2022, when the FRB started a series of eleven federal funds target range rate increases 
cumulating in a 525-basis point increase to a target range of 5.25% to 5.50%. More recently, in the third and fourth quarters 
of 2024, the FRB cut the federal funds target range rate three times by a total of 100 basis points from a 23-year high of 
5.25% to 5.50% to 4.25% to 4.50%.
Average noninterest-bearing deposits during the year ended December 31, 2024, were $1.89 billion, compared to 
$2.15 billion at December 31, 2023, a decrease of $259.1 million, or 12.1%, and represented 22.2% and 26.0% of average 
total deposits for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Noninterest-bearing deposits have been impacted 
by the higher interest rate environment, as customers have been moving out of noninterest-bearing deposit balances into 
higher interest-earning investments, however, this trend has been slowing as rates begin to stabilize.
The following table presents the maturity distribution of our time deposits and the amount of such deposits in excess 
of the FDIC insurance limit at December 31, 2024. There were no otherwise uninsured time deposits below the FDIC 
insurance limit at December 31, 2024. The estimated total amount of uninsured deposits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, was 
$3.66 billion and $3.58 billion, respectively.
(Dollars in thousands)
Remaining maturity:
U.S. Time Deposits 
in Excess of the 
FDIC Insurance 
Limit
Total Time & 
Brokered Time
Deposits
3 months or less
$ 
119,036 
$ 
465,377 
Over 3 through 6 months
 
96,933 
 
333,832 
Over 6 through 12 months
 
43,416 
 
174,265 
Over 12 months
 
5,460 
 
47,516 
Total
$ 
264,845 
$ 
1,020,990 
71

Borrowings
Borrowed funds are summarized as follows:
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Short-term FHLB advances
$ 
— 
$ 
70,000 
Long-term FHLB advances
 
6,198 
 
6,474 
Overnight repurchase agreements with depositors
 
6,262 
 
7,124 
Total FHLB advances and other borrowings
$ 
12,460 
$ 
83,598 
Subordinated indebtedness, net
$ 
159,943 
$ 
194,279 
Short-term FHLB advances decreased $70.0 million, or 100.0%, at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 
2023. Due to our increasing liquidity, we paid down our short-term advances during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Our long-term debt consists of advances from the FHLB with original maturities greater than one year and the 
subordinated indebtedness captioned and described below. Interest rates for FHLB long-term advances outstanding at 
December 31, 2024 and 2023, ranged from 1.99% to 4.57% and were subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of 
prepayment. 
Overnight repurchase agreements with depositors consist of obligations of ours to depositors and mature on a daily 
basis. These obligations to depositors carried a daily average interest rate of 2.62% and 2.21% for the years ended December 
31, 2024, and 2023, respectively. 
At December 31, 2024, we held 37 unfunded letters of credit from the FHLB totaling $709.2 million with expiration 
dates ranging from January 2, 2025, to September 22, 2027. These letters of credit either support pledges for our public fund 
deposits or confirm letters of credit we have issued to support our customers’ businesses. Security for all indebtedness and 
outstanding commitments to the FHLB consists of a blanket floating lien on all of our first mortgage loans, commercial real 
estate and other real estate loans, as well as our investment in capital stock of the FHLB and deposit accounts at the FHLB. 
The net amounts available under our borrowing capacity from the FHLB at December 31, 2024 and 2023, were $2.15 billion 
and $2.01 billion, respectively.
Additionally, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had the ability to borrow $1.33 billion and $1.42 billion from the 
discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (“FRBD”), with $1.57 billion and $1.69 billion in commercial and 
industrial loans pledged as collateral, respectively. There were no borrowings against this line at both December 31, 2024 and 
2023.
Holding Company Line of Credit
The Company had a line of credit with a maximum aggregate principal balance of $100 million, consisting of an 
initial $50.0 million extension of credit and any one or more potential incremental revolving loan amounts up to an aggregate 
principal of $50.0 million. Consistent with the terms of the agreement, the Company extended the maturity twice in prior 
years, and the Loan Agreement was terminated as of the October 27, 2024, expiration date. The Company had no balance 
outstanding on this revolving credit loan under the Loan Agreement at December 31, 2023.
Subordinated Indebtedness
At December 31, 2023, the Company had $34.7 million in subordinated promissory notes that were assumed in the 
merger with BTH (“BTH Notes”) with origination dates ranging from June 2015 to June 2021. After the five-year 
anniversary of issuance, the Company had the right to redeem the BTH Notes, in part or in full, at the Company’s discretion 
and, if applicable, subject to receipt of any required regulatory approvals. Primarily due to the declining Tier 2 capital 
contribution of the BTH Notes, the Company elected to redeem all but $1.1 million of the BTH Notes during the year ended 
December 31, 2024.
72

In February 2020, Origin Bank completed an offering of $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25% 
fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2030 (the “4.25% Notes”) to certain investors in a transaction exempt from 
registration under Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 4.25% Notes bore interest at a fixed annual 
rate of 4.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, to but excluding February 15, 2025. From and including February 15, 2025, 
to but excluding the maturity date or early redemption date, the interest rate would equal the three-month LIBOR rate plus 
282 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. On June 30, 2023, in conjunction with the customary fallback provision upon 
the discontinuation of LIBOR, the rate for the floating rate periods from and including February 15, 2025, on these notes 
transitioned to the three-month term SOFR plus 308 basis points. Origin Bank elected to redeem the 4.25% Notes on 
February 15, 2025, as permitted under the terms of the 4.25% Notes. 
In October 2020, the Company completed of an offering of $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.50% 
fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2030 (the “4.50% Notes”). The 4.50% Notes bear a fixed interest rate of 4.50%, 
payable semi-annually in arrears, to but excluding November 1, 2025. From and including November 1, 2025, to but 
excluding the maturity date or earlier redemption date, the 4.50% Notes bear a floating interest rate expected to equal the 
three-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 432 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Company may 
redeem the 4.50% Notes at any time upon certain specified events or in whole or in part on or after November 1, 2025. The 
4.50% Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes for the Company and a portion of the proceeds was 
transferred to Origin Bank during the fourth quarter of 2020, which qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes 
for the Bank. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and with the approval of the Board of Governors of the 
Federal Reserve System, the Company repurchased $1.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, of the 4.50% notes.
For information regarding our junior subordinated debentures underlying the issuance of trust preferred securities, 
please see Note 11 — Borrowings in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this 
report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Management oversees our liquidity position to ensure adequate cash and liquid assets are available to support our 
operations and satisfy current and future financial obligations, including demand for loan funding and deposit withdrawals. 
Management continually monitors, forecasts and tests our liquidity and non-core dependency ratios to ensure compliance 
with targets established by our Asset-Liability Management Committee and approved by our board of directors.
The Company, which is a separate legal entity apart from the Bank, must provide for its own liquidity, including the 
funding of the payment of any dividends that may be declared for our common stockholders and interest and principal on any 
outstanding debt or trust preferred securities incurred by the Company. The available cash balances as noted in the table 
below are available for the general corporate purposes described above, as well as providing capital support to the Bank.
Management measures our liquidity position by giving consideration to both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet 
sources of and demands for funds on a daily and weekly basis. The table below shows the liquidity measures for the 
Company at the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Available cash balances at the holding company (unconsolidated)
$ 
47,876 
$ 
87,698 
Cash and liquid securities as a percentage of total assets
 10.6 %
 10.9 %
There are regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends under federal and state laws, regulations 
and policies. See Item 1. Business - Regulation and Supervision above for more information.
Currently, we believe we have sufficient liquidity from our available on- and off-balance sheet liquidity sources, 
however, should market conditions change, we may take action to enhance our financial flexibility.
In addition to cash generated from operations, we utilize a number of funding sources to manage our liquidity, 
including core deposits, investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, loan repayments, federal funds lines of credit 
available from other financial institutions, as well as advances from the FHLB. We may also use the Federal Reserve 
discount window as a source of short-term funding.
73

Core deposits, which are total deposits excluding time deposits greater than $250,000 and brokered deposits, are a 
major source of funds used to meet cash flow needs. Maintaining the ability to acquire these funds as needed in a variety of 
markets is the key to assuring our liquidity.
The investment portfolio is another source for meeting our liquidity needs. Monthly payments on mortgage-backed 
securities are used for short-term liquidity, and our investments are generally traded in active markets that offer a readily 
available source of cash through sales, if needed. Securities in our investment portfolio are also used to secure certain deposit 
types, such as deposits from state and local municipalities, and can be pledged as collateral for other borrowing sources.
Other sources available for meeting liquidity needs include long- and short-term advances from the FHLB, and 
federal funds lines of credit. Long-term funds obtained from the FHLB are primarily used as an alternative source to fund 
long-term growth of the balance sheet by supporting growth in loans and other long-term interest-earning assets. We typically 
rely on such funding when the cost of such borrowings compares favorably to the rates that we would be required to pay for 
other funding sources, including certain deposits. See Note 11 — Borrowings to our consolidated financial statements 
contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional borrowing capacity and outstanding advances at the FHLB.
We also had unsecured federal funds lines of credit available to us, with no amounts outstanding at either December 
31, 2024 or 2023. These lines of credit primarily provide short-term liquidity and in order to ensure availability of these 
funds, we test these lines of credit at least annually. Interest is charged at the prevailing market rate on federal funds 
purchased and FHLB advances.
Additionally, we had the ability to borrow at the Federal Reserve discount window using our commercial and 
industrial loans as collateral. There were no borrowings against this line at December 31, 2024.
In the normal course of business as a financial services provider, we enter into various financial instruments, such as 
certain contractual obligations and commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, to meet the financing needs of our 
customers. These commitments are discussed in more detail in Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies to our 
consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity provides a source of permanent funding, allows for future growth and provides a degree of 
protection to withstand unforeseen adverse developments. Changes in stockholders’ equity is reflected below:
Balance at January 1, 2024
$ 
1,062,905 
Net income
 
76,492 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
14,994 
Dividends declared - common stock ($0.60 per share)
 
(18,991) 
Other
 
9,845 
Balance at December 31, 2024
$ 
1,145,245 
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
Stock Repurchases
In July 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the 
Company may, from time to time, purchase up to $50 million of its outstanding common stock. The shares may be 
repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, depending upon market conditions 
and other factors, and in accordance with applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The stock 
repurchase program is intended to expire in three years but may be terminated or amended by the Board of Directors at any 
time. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares at any time.
There were no stock repurchases during the year ended December 31, 2024 or 2023. 
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 signed into law during in August 2022 includes a provision for an excise tax 
equal to 1% of the fair market value of any stock repurchased by covered corporations during a taxable year, subject to 
certain limits and provisions. The excise tax is effective beginning in 2023. There was no impact to our financial condition or 
result of operations as a result of this tax.
74

Regulatory Capital Requirements
Together with the Bank, we are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking 
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators that, if enforced, could 
have a direct material effect on our financial statements. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, we and the Bank were in 
compliance with all applicable regulatory capital requirements, and the Bank was classified as “well capitalized” for purposes 
of the prompt corrective action regulations of the Federal Reserve. As we deploy capital and continue to grow operations, 
regulatory capital levels may decrease depending on the level of earnings. However, we expect to monitor and control growth 
in order to remain “well capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines and in compliance with all applicable regulatory 
capital standards. While we are currently classified as “well capitalized,” an extended economic recession could adversely 
impact our reported and regulatory capital ratios.
The following table presents our regulatory capital ratios, as well as those of the Bank, at the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
$ 
1,085,860 
 13.32 % $ 
1,012,916 
 11.83 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
1,101,766 
 13.52 
 
1,028,729 
 12.01 
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
1,339,735 
 16.44 
 
1,286,604 
 15.02 
Tier 1 capital (to average total consolidated assets)
 
1,101,766 
 11.08 
 
1,028,729 
 10.50 
Origin Bank
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
$ 
1,075,768 
 13.29 % $ 
1,019,732 
 11.95 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
1,075,768 
 13.29 
 
1,019,732 
 11.95 
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
 
1,239,644 
 15.31 
 
1,188,000 
 13.92 
Tier 1 capital (to average total consolidated assets)
 
1,075,768 
 10.89 
 
1,019,732 
 10.45 
Item 7A. 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Our financial management 
policy provides management with guidelines for effective funds management, and we have established a measurement system 
for monitoring the net interest rate sensitivity position.
Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our 
assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which 
have a short-term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential for economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These 
economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The 
objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the consolidated balance sheets to minimize the 
inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.
We manage exposure to interest rates by structuring the consolidated balance sheet in the ordinary course of 
business. We may utilize derivative financial instruments as part of an ongoing effort to mitigate interest rate risk exposure to 
interest rate fluctuations and facilitate the needs of our customers. For more information about our derivative financial 
instruments, see Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained 
in Part II, Item 8 of this report. Based on the nature of operations, we are not subject to foreign exchange or commodity price 
risk.
Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Bank’s Asset-Liability Management Committee in accordance 
with policies approved by the Bank’s board of directors. The committee formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of 
interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the committee considers the impact on earnings and 
capital of the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business 
strategies and other factors.
75

The committee meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate 
changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activities, 
commitments to originate loans and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the committee reviews 
liquidity, cash flow flexibility, maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity. We employ 
methodologies to manage interest rate risk, which includes an analysis of relationships between interest-earning assets and 
interest-bearing liabilities, and an interest rate shock simulation model.
We use interest rate risk simulation models and shock analyses to test the interest rate sensitivity of net interest 
income and fair value of equity, and the impact of changes in interest rates on other financial metrics. Our interest rate risk 
modeling incorporates a number of assumptions, including the repricing sensitivity of certain assets and liabilities, asset 
prepayment speeds, and the expected average life of non-maturity deposits. The assumptions used are inherently uncertain, 
and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations 
in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, 
magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of 
various management strategies.
On a quarterly basis, we run various simulation models, including a static balance sheet and a dynamic growth 
balance sheet. These models test the impact on net interest income and fair value of equity from changes in market interest 
rates under various scenarios. Under the static model, rates are shocked instantaneously, and ramped rates change over a 
twelve-month and twenty-four-month horizon based upon parallel yield curve shifts. Parallel shock scenarios assume 
instantaneous parallel movements in the yield curve compared to a flat yield curve scenario. Additionally, we run a non-
parallel simulation involving analysis of interest income and expense under various changes in the shape of the yield curve. 
Internal policy regarding interest rate risk simulations currently specifies that for instantaneous parallel shifts of the yield 
curve, estimated net interest income at risk for the subsequent one-year period should not decline by more than 10.0% for a 
100-basis point shift, 15.0% for a 200-basis point shift, 20.0% for a 300-basis point shift, and 25.0% for a 400-basis point 
shift. We continue to monitor our asset sensitivity and evaluate strategies to prevent being significantly impacted by future 
changes in interest rates.
The following table summarizes the impact of an instantaneous, sustained simulated change in net interest income 
and fair value of equity over a 12-month horizon at the date indicated. 
December 31, 2024
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
% Change in Net 
Interest Income
% Change in Fair 
Value of Equity
+400
 15.9 %
 (9.3) %
+300
 12.1 
 (6.8) 
+200
 8.3 
 (4.1) 
+100
 4.2 
 (1.8) 
Base
-100
 (4.9) 
 1.7 
-200
 (7.8) 
 3.2 
-300
 (10.1) 
 4.9 
-400
 (11.0) 
 7.1 
We have found that, historically, interest rates on deposits do not change completely in tandem with the changes in 
the discount and federal funds rates. Overall, interest rates on deposits typically experience a lower degree of rate change than 
changes in market interest rates. This assumption is incorporated into the simulation model and is generally not fully reflected 
in a gap analysis, meaning that process by which we measure the gap between interest rate sensitive assets versus interest rate 
sensitive liabilities. The assumptions incorporated into the model are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot 
precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net 
interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of 
interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various strategies.
76

The FRB sets various benchmark rates, including the federal funds rate, and thereby influences the general market 
rates of interest, including the loan and deposit rates offered by financial institutions and the fair value of our available for 
sale securities. On September 18, 2024, the FRB reduced the federal funds target rate range by 50 basis points, to a range of 
4.75% to 5.00%, marking the first rate reduction since early 2020. Subsequently, it implemented two additional reductions, 
with the current federal funds target range set to 4.25% to 4.50% on December 18, 2024. During the second half of 2024, the 
federal funds target range decreased 100 basis points from its recent cycle high. 
Impact of Inflation
Our financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which presently 
requires us to measure the majority of our financial position and operating results primarily in terms of historic dollars. 
Changes in the relative value of money due to inflation or recession are generally not considered.
Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in 
nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the general level 
of inflation. However, inflation affects financial institutions by increasing their cost of goods and services purchased, as well 
as the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense, and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates 
generally decrease the market value of investments and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings, and 
stockholders’ equity. In management’s opinion, changes in interest rates affect the financial condition of a financial 
institution to a far greater degree than changes in the inflation rate. While interest rates are greatly influenced by changes in 
the inflation rate, they do not necessarily change at the same rate or in the same magnitude as the inflation rate. Interest rates 
are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including changes in the expected rate of inflation, the 
influence of general and local economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, its 
agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities.
77

Item 8. 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Financial Statements
DECEMBER 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 
INDEX
Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PCAOB ID 686)
79
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
81
Consolidated Statements of Income
82
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
83
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
87
78

Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee 
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Origin Bancorp, Inc. (Company) as of 
December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), 
changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 
31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the 
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 
the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of 
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally 
accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of  December 31, 2024, 
based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated  February 27, 2025 expressed an 
unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express 
an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to 
the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan 
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material 
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial 
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such 
procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial 
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below arise from the current-period audit of the financial statements that 
was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or 
disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or 
complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the 
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, 
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company’s loan portfolio totaled $7.57 billion as of December 31, 2024, and the allowance for credit losses 
on loans was $91.1 million. 
As more fully described in Notes 1 and 4 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company 
estimates its exposure to expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date, for existing loans held for 
investment.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
79

The determination of the ACL requires management to exercise significant judgment and consider numerous 
subjective factors, including determining qualitative factors utilized to adjust historical loss rates, loan credit risk 
grading, and identifying loans requiring individual evaluation among others. As disclosed by management, 
different assumptions and conditions could result in a materially different amount for the estimate of the ACL. 
We identified the identification and valuation of the qualitative factors within the ACL at December 31, 2024 as a 
critical audit matter. Auditing the qualitative factors involved a high degree of judgment and subjectivity in 
evaluating management's assessment of economic conditions and other portfolio and environmental factors.
The primary procedures we performed as of December 31, 2024 to address this critical audit matter included:
•
Obtained an understanding of the Company’s process for establishing the qualitative factors
•
Tested the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the establishment of qualitative factors in 
the allowance for loan credit losses
•
Evaluated the completeness and accuracy and the relevance of the key data used as inputs in the 
qualitative factor adjustment process 
•
Evaluated the qualitative adjustments to the ACL, including assessing the basis for adjustments and the 
reasonableness of the significant assumptions
•
Evaluated credit quality trends in delinquencies, non-accruals, charge-offs, and loan risk ratings
/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
Little Rock, Arkansas
February 27, 2025
80

December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Assets
 
Cash and due from banks
$ 
132,991 
$ 
127,278 
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
 
337,258 
 
153,163 
Total cash and cash equivalents
 
470,249 
 
280,441 
Securities:
Available for sale
 
1,102,528 
 
1,253,631 
Held to maturity, net allowance for credit losses of $50 and $63 at December 31, 2024, 
and December 31, 2023, respectively (fair value of $10,456 and $10,848 at December 
31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively)
 
11,095 
 
11,615 
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
6,512 
 
6,808 
Total securities
 
1,120,135 
 
1,272,054 
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions
 
71,643 
 
55,190 
Loans held for sale at fair value
 
10,494 
 
16,852 
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $91,060 and $96,868 at December 31, 2024, 
and December 31, 2023, respectively
 
7,482,653 
 
7,564,076 
Premises and equipment, net
 
126,620 
 
118,978 
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”)
 
— 
 
15,637 
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
 
40,840 
 
39,905 
Goodwill
 
128,679 
 
128,679 
Other intangible assets, net
 
37,473 
 
45,452 
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
 
189,916 
 
185,320 
Total assets
$ 
9,678,702 
$ 
9,722,584 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Noninterest-bearing deposits
$ 
1,900,651 
$ 
1,919,638 
Interest-bearing deposits
 
5,301,479 
 
4,918,597 
Time deposits
 
1,020,990 
 
1,412,890 
Total deposits
 
8,223,120 
 
8,251,125 
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances, repurchase agreements and other 
borrowings
 
12,460 
 
83,598 
Subordinated indebtedness, net
 
159,943 
 
194,279 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
137,934 
 
130,677 
Total liabilities
 
8,533,457 
 
8,659,679 
Commitments and contingencies - See Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies
 
— 
 
— 
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized
 
— 
 
— 
Common stock ($5.00 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 31,197,574 and 
30,986,109 shares issued at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively)
 
155,988 
 
154,931 
Additional paid-in capital
 
537,366 
 
528,578 
Retained earnings
 
557,920 
 
500,419 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(106,029)  
(121,023) 
Total stockholders’ equity
 
1,145,245 
 
1,062,905 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$ 
9,678,702 
$ 
9,722,584 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
81

Interest and dividend income
Interest and fees on loans
$ 
517,281 
$ 
466,815 $ 
286,150 
Investment securities-taxable
 
26,642 
 
31,682  
27,795 
Investment securities-nontaxable
 
3,672 
 
5,098  
7,172 
Interest and dividend income on assets held in other financial institutions  
16,990 
 
19,796  
5,487 
Total interest and dividend income
 
564,585 
 
523,391  
326,604 
Interest expense
Interest-bearing deposits
 
254,873 
 
196,457  
33,509 
FHLB advances and other borrowings
 
1,602 
 
17,258  
9,411 
Subordinated indebtedness
 
7,744 
 
10,119  
8,406 
Total interest expense
 
264,219 
 
223,834  
51,326 
Net interest income 
 
300,366 
 
299,557  
275,278 
Provision for credit losses
 
7,448 
 
16,753  
24,691 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
 
292,918 
 
282,804  
250,587 
Noninterest income
Insurance commission and fee income
 
26,759 
 
25,085  
22,869 
Service charges and fees
 
19,015 
 
18,803  
17,669 
Other fee income
 
8,917 
 
8,089  
7,279 
Mortgage banking revenue
 
6,580 
 
3,356  
6,722 
Swap fee income
 
323 
 
1,277  
457 
(Loss) gain on sales of securities, net
 
(14,799)  
(11,635)  
1,664 
Change in fair value of equity investments
 
5,188 
 
10,096  
— 
Other income
 
3,396 
 
3,264  
614 
Total noninterest income
 
55,379 
 
58,335  
57,274 
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
 
148,823 
 
138,819  
118,971 
Occupancy and equipment, net
 
27,865 
 
26,783  
20,203 
Data processing
 
13,497 
 
11,590  
10,456 
Office and operations
 
11,441 
 
10,834  
8,120 
Intangible asset amortization
 
7,979 
 
9,628  
5,488 
Regulatory assessments
 
6,902 
 
6,456  
3,547 
Advertising and marketing
 
6,150 
 
5,986  
4,431 
Professional services
 
6,610 
 
5,931  
3,813 
Loan-related expense
 
3,164 
 
5,035  
6,097 
Electronic banking
 
5,162 
 
4,712  
3,958 
Franchise tax expense
 
2,897 
 
3,334  
3,582 
Merger-related expense
 
— 
 
—  
6,171 
Other expense
 
10,548 
 
6,108  
5,582 
Total noninterest expense
 
251,038 
 
235,216  
200,419 
Income before income tax expense
 
97,259 
 
105,923  
107,442 
Income tax expense
 
20,767 
 
22,123  
19,727 
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 $ 
87,715 
Basic earnings per common share
$ 
2.46 
$ 
2.72 $ 
3.29 
Diluted earnings per common share
 
2.45 
 
2.71  
3.28 
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
82

Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 $ 
87,715 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Securities available for sale and transferred securities:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period
 
4,340 
 
37,811  
(209,097) 
Reclassification adjustment for net (gain) loss included in net 
income
 
14,799 
 
11,635  
(1,664) 
Change in the net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale 
investment securities, before tax
 
19,139 
 
49,446  
(210,761) 
Net loss realized as a yield adjustment in interest on transferred 
investment securities
 
(11)  
(10)  
(10) 
Change in the net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, 
before tax
 
19,128 
 
49,436  
(210,771) 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to net unrealized gain (loss) 
arising during the period
 
4,017 
 
10,382  
(44,262) 
Change in the net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, 
net of tax
 
15,111 
 
39,054  
(166,509) 
Cash flow hedges:
Net unrealized gain arising during the period
 
303 
 
867  
1,161 
Reclassification adjustment for net gain (loss) included in net 
income
 
(451)  
(1,123)  
15 
Change in the net unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, 
before tax
 
(148)  
(256)  
1,146 
Income tax (benefit) expense related to net unrealized gain (loss) 
on cash flow hedges
 
(31)  
(54)  
241 
Change in net unrealized net (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, net 
of tax
 
(117)  
(202)  
905 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 
14,994 
 
38,852  
(165,604) 
Comprehensive income (loss)
$ 
91,486 
$ 
122,652 $ 
(77,889) 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 (Dollars in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
83

Balance at January 1, 2022
 
23,746,502 
$ 
118,733 
$ 
242,114 
$ 
363,635 
$ 
5,729 
$ 
730,211 
Net income
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
87,715 
 
— 
 
87,715 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
(165,604)  
(165,604) 
Stock based compensation expense
 
— 
 
— 
 
3,449 
 
— 
 
— 
 
3,449 
Stock based compensation shares issued, net of shares withheld
 
36,868 
 
184 
 
(184)  
— 
 
— 
 
— 
Exercise of stock options, net of shares withheld
 
142,231 
 
711 
 
2,185 
 
— 
 
— 
 
2,896 
Shares issued under employee stock purchase program
 
26,089 
 
130 
 
736 
 
— 
 
— 
 
866 
Options assumed - BT Holdings, Inc., (“BTH”) Merger
 
— 
 
— 
 
13,687 
 
— 
 
— 
 
13,687 
Stock issuance - BTH Merger
 
6,794,910 
 
33,975 
 
258,682 
 
— 
 
— 
 
292,657 
Dividends declared - common stock (1 per share)
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
(15,934)  
— 
 
(15,934) 
Balance at December 31, 2022
 
30,746,600 
 
153,733 
 
520,669 
 
435,416 
 
(159,875)  
949,943 
Net income
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
83,800 
 
— 
 
83,800 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
38,852 
 
38,852 
Stock based compensation expense
 
— 
 
— 
 
5,281 
 
— 
 
— 
 
5,281 
Stock based compensation shares issued, net of shares withheld
 
60,329 
 
302 
 
(696)  
— 
 
— 
 
(394) 
Exercise of stock options, net of shares withheld
 
132,967 
 
665 
 
2,437 
 
— 
 
— 
 
3,102 
Shares issued under employee stock purchase program
 
46,213 
 
231 
 
887 
 
— 
 
— 
 
1,118 
Dividends declared - common stock (1 per share)
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
(18,797)  
— 
 
(18,797) 
Balance at December 31, 2023
 
30,986,109 
 
154,931 
 
528,578 
 
500,419 
 
(121,023)  
1,062,905 
Net income
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
76,492 
 
— 
 
76,492 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
14,994 
 
14,994 
Stock-based compensation expense
 
— 
 
— 
 
7,166 
 
— 
 
— 
 
7,166 
Stock based compensation shares issued, net of shares withheld
 
84,473 
 
422 
 
(971)  
— 
 
— 
 
(549) 
Exercise of stock options, net of shares withheld 
 
70,334 
 
352 
 
1,490 
 
— 
 
— 
 
1,842 
Shares issued under employee stock purchase program
 
56,658 
 
283 
 
1,103 
 
— 
 
— 
 
1,386 
Dividends declared - common stock (1 per share)
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
(18,991)  
— 
 
(18,991) 
Balance at December 31, 2024
 
31,197,574 
$ 
155,988 
$ 
537,366 
$ 
557,920 
$ 
(106,029) $ 
1,145,245 
Common Shares 
Outstanding
Common
Stock
Additional 
Paid-In
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
84

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 $ 
87,715 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating 
activities:
Provision for credit losses
 
7,448 
 
16,753  
24,691 
Depreciation and amortization
 
16,800 
 
17,628  
12,305 
Net amortization on securities
 
4,807 
 
6,889  
8,734 
Accretion of net premium/discount on purchased loans
 
(2)  
(2,023)  
(2,840) 
Amortization of investments in tax credit funds
 
1,749 
 
1,842  
1,659 
Loss (gain) on sale of securities, net
 
14,799 
 
11,635  
(1,664) 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
 
(1,467)  
27,714  
18,309 
Stock-based compensation expense
 
7,166 
 
5,281  
3,449 
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
 
(197,577)  
(187,088)  
(259,202) 
Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale
 
185,339 
 
158,357  
264,607 
Gain on mortgage loans held for sale (including origination of MSR for the 
years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022)
 
(4,928)  
(3,819)  
(7,175) 
MSR asset valuation adjustment
 
(450)  
4,089  
(1,219) 
Gain on sale of MSR asset
 
(410)  
—  
— 
Net (gain) loss on disposals of premises and equipment
 
(878)  
2  
(19) 
Increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance
 
(935)  
(865)  
(688) 
Gain on equity securities without a readily determinable fair value
 
(5,188)  
(10,096)  
— 
Net (gain) losses on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned
 
(67)  
(66)  
194 
Net change in operating leases
 
1,869 
 
(770)  
(3) 
Increase in other assets
 
(1,074)  
(6,627)  
(2,099) 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
 
4,988 
 
7,285  
(1,105) 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
108,481 
 
129,921  
145,649 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash acquired in business combination
 
— 
 
—  
69,953 
Purchases of securities available for sale
 
(247,387)  
(10,981)  
(558,091) 
Maturities and pay downs of securities available for sale
 
166,818 
 
137,815  
165,328 
Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale
 
231,199 
 
291,189  
487,544 
Purchase of securities held to maturity
 
— 
 
—  
(7,000) 
Maturities, pay downs and calls of securities held to maturity
 
522 
 
486  
17,750 
Pay downs of securities carried at fair value
 
299 
 
285  
275 
Redemption of non-marketable equity securities held in other financial 
institutions(1)
 
10,680 
 
—  
— 
Purchase of non-marketable equity securities held in other financial 
institutions(1)
 
(21,302)  
—  
— 
Net redemptions (purchases) of non-marketable equity securities held in other 
financial institutions(1)
 
(10,622)  
23,980  
(15,818) 
Originations of mortgage warehouse loans
 
(9,705,580)  
(6,470,400)  
(9,126,356) 
Proceeds from pay-offs of mortgage warehouse loans
 
9,686,466 
 
6,425,300  
9,468,569 
Net decrease (increase) in loans, excluding mortgage warehouse and loans held 
for sale
 
106,877 
 
(499,558)  
(949,638) 
Proceeds from sale of the MSR asset
 
15,885 
 
—  
— 
Return of capital and other distributions from limited partnership investments
 
1,374 
 
1,757  
6,668 
Capital calls on limited partnership investments
 
(1,082)  
(2,644)  
(4,057) 
Purchase of low-income housing tax credit investments
 
(664)  
(572)  
(3,646) 
Purchases of premises and equipment
 
(22,047)  
(26,830)  
(8,466) 
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
 
5,568 
 
49  
— 
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
 
4,434 
 
93  
997 
Purchase of equity method investment
 
(800)  
—  
— 
Proceeds from termination of cash flow hedge
 
680 
 
—  
— 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 
231,940 
 
(130,031)  
(455,988) 
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 (Dollars in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
85

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
$ 
(28,005) $ 
475,423 $ 
(361,450) 
Repayments of long-term FHLB advances
 
(275)  
(266)  
(250,257) 
Proceeds from short-term FHLB advances
 
1,685,000 
 
6,065,000  
10,025,000 
Repayments of short-term FHLB advances
 
(1,755,000)  
(6,545,000)  
(9,475,000) 
Maturities of subordinated debentures
 
— 
 
(2,625)  
— 
Repurchase of subordinated debentures
 
(34,599)  
(4,729)  
— 
Repayments of other short-term borrowings
 
— 
 
(30,000)  
— 
Proceeds from other short-term borrowings
 
— 
 
—  
30,000 
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 
(863)  
(20,797)  
8,339 
Dividends paid
 
(18,745)  
(18,567)  
(15,887) 
Cash received from exercise of stock options
 
1,874 
 
3,140  
2,948 
Net cash used in financing activities
 
(150,613)  
(78,421)  
(36,307) 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
189,808 
 
(78,531)  
(346,646) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
280,441 
 
358,972  
705,618 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$ 
470,249 
$ 
280,441 $ 
358,972 
Interest paid
$ 
268,459 
$ 
215,479 $ 
50,104 
Income taxes paid (refund)
 
24,171 
 
383  
(6,261) 
Significant non-cash transactions:
Unsettled liability for investment purchases recorded at trade date
 
(5)  
—  
751 
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans
 
3,576 
 
3,243  
675 
Real estate transferred from fixed assets to other real estate owned
 
894 
 
—  
— 
Transfers from loans held for sale to loans held for investment (1)
 
18,596 
 
—  
— 
Decrease in Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) 
repurchase obligation
 
— 
 
(24,569)  
(18,786) 
Recognition of operating right-of-use assets
 
11,454 
 
20,568  
13,428 
Recognition of operating lease liabilities
 
12,659 
 
20,653  
13,643 
Total assets acquired in BTH merger
 
— 
 
—  
1,846,598 
Total liabilities assumed in BTH merger
 
— 
 
—  
1,633,340 
Common stock issued in BTH merger as consideration
 
— 
 
—  
292,657 
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
________________________
(1)
No change was made to the prior period presentation due to immateriality.  
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
 (Dollars in thousands)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
86

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies 
Nature of Operations. 
Origin Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) is a financial holding company headquartered in 
Ruston, Louisiana. The Company’s wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Origin Bank (“Bank”), was founded in 1912 in 
Choudrant, Louisiana. Deeply rooted in Origin’s history is a culture committed to providing personalized relationship 
banking to businesses, municipalities, and personal clients to enrich the lives of the people in the communities it serves. The 
Bank provides a broad range of financial services and currently operates more than 60 locations in Dallas/Fort Worth, East 
Texas, Houston, across North Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and into the Florida Panhandle. 
Basis of Presentation. 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all other 
entities in which Origin Bancorp, Inc. has a controlling financial interest, including the Bank, and Forth Insurance, LLC. All 
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s accounting and 
financial reporting policies conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States 
(“U.S. GAAP”) and to general practices within the financial services industry. The Company has evaluated subsequent events 
for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.
Reclassifications. 
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current 
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or stockholders’ equity.
Variable Interest Entities. 
The Company determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity 
by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity (“VIE”) under U.S. GAAP. Voting 
interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself 
independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and 
the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. The Company consolidates voting interest entities in which it has all, 
or at least a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in applicable accounting standards, VIEs are entities that lack one or 
more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise 
has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and an 
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with 
a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. The Company’s wholly-owned 
subsidiaries CTB Statutory Trust I, First Louisiana Statutory Trust I and BT Holdings Trust I are VIEs for which the 
Company is not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the accounts of these trusts are not included in the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements.
Operating Segments. 
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial 
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to 
allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s senior executive management functions as its CODM. The 
Bank is the only significant subsidiary upon which management makes decisions regarding how to allocate resources and 
assess performance. Individual bank branches offer a group of similar services, including commercial, real estate and 
consumer loans, time deposits, checking and savings accounts, all with similar operating and economic characteristics. While 
the CODM monitors the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed, and financial 
performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the community banking services and branch 
locations are considered by management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment, community banking. 
The CODM uses net interest income and net income to evaluate income generated from segment assets (return on 
average assets) in deciding whether to reinvest profits into the Company, pursue acquisitions or pay out dividends. Net 
income is used to monitor budget versus actual results. The CODM also uses net income in competitive analysis by 
benchmarking to the Company’s peers. The competitive analysis along with the monitoring of budgeted versus actual results 
are used in assessing performance of the segment and in establishing management’s compensation. The Company’s 
significant expense categories are disclosed on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. 
Use of Estimates. 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management 
to make estimates and assumptions based on available information that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements 
and disclosures provided, including the accompanying notes, and actual results could differ. Material estimates that are 
particularly susceptible to change include the allowance for credit losses for loans; fair value measurements of assets and 
liabilities; and income taxes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in 
the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the period they are deemed necessary. While management uses its best 
judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
87

Cash and Cash Equivalents. 
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers 
all cash on hand, demand deposits with other banks, federal funds sold and short-term interest-bearing cash items with an 
original maturity less than 90 days to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains deposits with other financial institutions 
in amounts that exceed federal deposit insurance coverage. Furthermore, federal funds sold are essentially uncollateralized 
loans to other financial institutions. Management regularly evaluates the credit risk associated with the counterparties to these 
transactions and believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risks on cash and cash equivalents.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had cash collateral required to be held with counterparties on certain 
derivative transactions as discussed in Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments. 
Securities. 
The Company accounts for debt and equity securities as follows:
Available for Sale (“AFS”) - Debt securities that will be held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that 
may be sold in response to changes in market interest or prepayment rates, needs for liquidity and changes in the availability 
of and the yield of alternative investments are classified as AFS. These assets are carried at fair value. Fair value is 
determined using published quotes. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on other methods 
including, but not limited to the discounting of cash flows. Unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities are excluded from 
earnings and reported net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income until realized. Please see the paragraphs 
under Allowance for Credit Losses referenced below in this footnote for information on the allowance for credit losses 
pertaining to AFS securities.
Held to Maturity (“HTM”) - Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold until 
maturity are classified as HTM and are carried at their remaining unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums or 
unaccredited discounts. Please see the paragraphs under Allowance for Credit Losses referenced below in this footnote for 
information on the allowance for credit losses pertaining to HTM securities.
Securities Carried at Fair Value through Income - Debt securities for which the Company has elected the fair value 
option for accounting are classified as securities carried at fair value through income. Management has elected the fair value 
option for these items to offset the corresponding change in fair value of related interest rate swap agreements. Fair value is 
determined using discounted cash flows and credit quality indicators. Changes in fair value are reported through the 
consolidated statements of income as a part of other noninterest income.
Interest income on securities includes amortization of purchase premiums and discounts. Premiums and discounts on 
securities are generally amortized using the interest method with a constant effective yield without anticipating prepayments, 
except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to 
their earliest call date. A security is placed on nonaccrual status if (i) principal or interest has been in default for a period of 
90 days or more or (ii) full payment of principal and interest is not expected. The Company has made a policy election to 
exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis of debt securities and report accrued interest in other assets in the 
consolidated balance sheets. Interest accrued but not received for a security placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against 
interest income. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and are recorded in 
noninterest income on the trade date.
Non-marketable Equity Securities Held in Other Financial Institutions.
Securities with limited marketability, 
such as stock in the FRBD or the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas (“FHLB”), are carried at cost, less impairment, if any. 
These investments in stock do not have readily determinable fair values. The Company’s remaining equity investments in 
other financial institutions, excluding FRBD and FHLB, totaling $43.4 million and $25.9 million at December 31, 2024 and 
2023, respectively, qualify for the practicability exception under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01 due to 
having illiquid markets and are carried at cost, less impairment, plus or minus any observable price changes. The carrying 
value of these securities was evaluated and determined not to be impaired during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 
2023.
Loans Held for Sale. 
Loans held for sale include mortgage loans and are carried at fair value, with unrealized 
gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statements of income. 
Gains and losses resulting from sales of mortgage loans are realized when the respective loans are sold to investors. 
Gains and losses are determined by the difference between the selling price and the carrying amount of the loans sold. Fees 
received from borrowers to guarantee the funding of mortgage loans held for sale are recognized as income or expense when 
the loans are sold or when it becomes evident that the commitment will not be used.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
88

Loans sold into the secondary market are considered transfers of financial assets. These transfers are accounted for 
as sales when control over the asset has been surrendered. See Transfers of Financial Assets below for more information. 
Transfers of Financial Assets. Transfers of financial assets (generally consisting of sales of loans held for sale and 
loan participations with unaffiliated banks) are accounted for as sales when control over the asset has been surrendered, 
which is deemed to have occurred when: an asset does not have any claims to it by the transferor or their creditors, including 
in bankruptcy or other receivership situations; the transferee obtains the unconditional right to pledge or exchange the asset; 
or the transfer does not include a repurchase provision above the limited recourse provisions of loan sales.
Acquisition Accounting and Acquired Loans. 
The Company accounts for its mergers/acquisitions under 
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805, Business 
Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including 
loans, are recorded at fair value. In accordance with ASC 326, the Company records a discount or premium and also an 
allowance for credit losses on acquired loans. All purchased loans are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value 
methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The fair value estimates associated with the 
loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, 
interest and other cash flows.
Purchased loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination are purchased 
credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. The Company evaluates acquired loans for deterioration in credit quality based on any of, 
but not limited to, the following: (1) non-accrual status; (2) troubled debt restructured designation; (3) risk ratings of special 
mention, substandard or doubtful; (4) watchlist credits; and (5) delinquency status, including loans that are current on merger/ 
acquisition date, but had previously been 60 days or more delinquent on two or more occasions. An allowance for credit 
losses is determined using the same methodology as other individually evaluated loans.
The Non-PCD model utilizes data from the Bank in order to determine the probability of default and loss given 
default to be used in the calculation. The initial allowance for credit losses, determined on a collective basis, is allocated to 
individual loans. The sum of the loan’s purchase price and allowance for credit losses becomes its initial amortized cost basis. 
The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a non-credit discount or premium, 
which is amortized or accreted into interest income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the allowance for credit 
losses are recorded through the provision for credit losses.
Loans. 
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or 
payoff, are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for credit losses, 
and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan 
origination fees, and certain direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the lives of the 
related loans using the interest method. Late fees are recognized as income when earned, assuming collectability is 
reasonably assured.
In addition to loans issued in the normal course of business, the Company considers overdrafts on customer deposit 
accounts to be loans and classifies these overdrafts as loans in its consolidated balance sheets. 
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when management believes that the borrower’s financial condition, after 
giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful, 
or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status even if the contractual 
payments are not past due if information becomes available that causes substantial doubt about the borrower’s ability to meet 
the contractual obligations of the loan. Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest 
due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the 
scheduled payment. When accrual of interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Past due status is based 
on contractual terms of the loan. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized to the extent cash payments are 
received, but payments received are usually applied to principal. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status 
when payments are considered current, the customer has made required payments for at least six months, and the Company 
reasonably expects to collect all principal and interest. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible, regardless 
of size, the portion of the loan determined to be uncollectible is then charged to the allowance for loan credit losses.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
89

Allowance for Credit Losses. 
The allowance for loan credit losses represents the estimated losses for financial 
assets accounted for on an amortized cost basis. Expected losses are calculated using relevant information about past events, 
including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of 
the reported amount. The Company evaluates loans held for investment (“LHFI”) on a pool basis with pools of loans 
characterized by loan type, collateral, industry, internal credit risk rating and Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score. 
Historical loss rates for each pool are calculated based on charge-off and recovery data beginning with the second quarter of 
2012. These loss rates are adjusted for differences between current period conditions, including the economic forecast and the 
conditions existing during the historical loss period. Historical losses are additionally adjusted for the effects of certain 
economic variables forecast over a one-year period followed by an immediate reversion to historical loss rates to estimate 
losses over the estimated remaining lives of the loans. The estimated remaining lives consist of the contractual lives, adjusted 
for estimated prepayments. Loans that exhibit characteristics different from their pool characteristics are evaluated on an 
individual basis. Certain of these loans are considered to be collateral dependent with the borrower experiencing financial 
difficulty. For these loans, the fair value of collateral practical expedient is elected whereby the allowance is calculated as the 
amount by which the amortized cost exceeds the fair value of collateral, less costs to sell (if applicable). Those individual 
loans that are not collateral dependent are evaluated based on a discounted cash flow methodology. This evaluation is 
inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes 
available. Loans are charged off against the allowance for credit losses when management believes the principal balance is 
unlikely to be collected. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
Delinquency statistics are updated at least monthly and are the most meaningful indicator of the credit quality of 
one-to-four single-family residential, home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. Internal risk ratings are 
considered the most meaningful indicator of credit quality for commercial and industrial, construction, and commercial real 
estate loans. Internal risk ratings are a key factor in identifying loans that are individually evaluated for credit loss and impact 
management’s estimates of loss factors used in determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses. Internal risk ratings 
are updated on a regular basis.
ASU No. 2022-02 eliminated the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings and enhanced disclosure 
requirements for certain loan modifications. The Company may provide modifications to borrowers experiencing financial 
difficulty in the form of principal forgiveness, interest rate reductions, other-than-insignificant payment delays, or term 
extensions. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged-off against the allowance for credit 
losses. In some cases, the Company may provide multiple types of concessions on one loan. The Company will evaluate 
whether the modification represents a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. The Company assesses all loan 
modifications to determine whether they were made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
The allowance for off-balance sheet exposures was determined using the same methodology that is applied to LHFI. 
Utilization rates are determined based on historical usage.
The Company evaluates the portfolio of AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, on a quarterly basis, to 
determine if it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before recovery of the 
amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the securities’ amortized cost basis 
is written down to fair value through income. For AFS securities that do not meet the criteria, the Company evaluates relevant 
factors to determine if the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, 
such factors as extent of the loss, adverse conditions related to the entity, industry or geographic region, security structure, 
ratings and changes by a rating agency and past performance are considered. If the assessment indicates that a credit loss 
exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the 
present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized costs basis, a credit loss exists and an 
allowance for credit losses is recorded and reflected in income as provision for credit loss expense.
The Company measures the expected credit losses on HTM securities on a collective basis by major security type, 
with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current 
conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. These amounts are established as an allowance for credit losses and 
included in earnings as provision for credit loss expense.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
90

Premises and Equipment, net. 
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and improvements are stated at cost less 
accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range 
from 15 to 50 years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the terms of 
the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Furniture, fixtures, and 
equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful 
lives of the assets, which range from three to 15 years.
 Leases.  
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease assets are 
included in accrued interest receivable and other assets, operating lease liabilities are included in accrued expenses and other 
liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company has made an accounting policy election not to 
recognize short-term lease assets and liabilities (less than a 12-month term) or immaterial equipment and server space leases 
in its consolidated balance sheets; instead, the Company recognizes the lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis 
over the life of the lease. The Company has no material finance leases.
Right of use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease 
liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU lease assets and liabilities 
are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. 
The Company uses an estimated incremental collateralized borrowing rate, which is derived from information available at the 
lease commencement date and gives consideration to the applicable FHLB borrowing rates, when determining the present 
value of lease payments.
The Company’s lease terms include options to extend a lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will 
exercise that option. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees. All of the Company’s 
operating long-term leases are real estate leases, which are accounted for as a single lease component.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
All derivatives are recorded on the accompanying 
consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended 
use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge 
accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives 
designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment 
attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and 
qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, 
are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss 
recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that 
are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash 
flow hedge. During the term of a cash flow hedge contract, the effective portion of changes in fair value in the derivative 
instrument are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Changes in the fair value of derivatives to which 
hedge accounting does not apply are recognized immediately in earnings. Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments 
describes the derivative instruments currently used by the Company and discloses how these derivatives impact its 
consolidated balance sheets and statements of income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the 
net assets of an acquired business, is not amortized but evaluated for potential impairment on an annual basis, which is 
typically October 1 for the Company, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. 
Other intangible assets, such as core deposit intangibles and relationship based intangibles, are amortized on a basis 
consistent with the receipt of economic benefit to the Company. Such assets are evaluated at least annually as to the 
recoverability of their carrying value for potential impairment. In the quarter following the period in which identified 
intangible assets become fully amortized, the fully amortized balances are removed from the gross asset and accumulated 
amortization amounts.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
91

Other Real Estate Owned. 
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) represents properties acquired through 
foreclosure or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure on loans on which the borrowers have defaulted as to payment of 
principal and interest. OREO also includes bank-owned real estate which the Company is no longer utilizing and intends to 
sell. These properties are initially recorded at fair value, less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost 
basis. Fair value is determined based on third-party appraisals. Any valuation adjustments required at the date of transfer 
from loans to OREO are charged to the allowance for credit losses. Any subsequent write-downs to reflect current fair value, 
or gains and losses on the sale of the properties are charged to noninterest income. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the 
balance of OREO was $3.6 million and $3.9 million, respectively, and included as a component of accrued interest receivable 
and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Overnight Repurchase Agreements with Depositors.
The Company enters into agreements under which it sells 
securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Company may 
transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates it to 
repurchase the assets. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase generally mature on the banking day following that on 
which the investment was initially sold and are treated as collateralized financing transactions which are recorded at the 
amounts at which the securities were sold plus accrued interest. Interest rates and maturity dates of the securities involved 
vary and are not intended to be matched with funds from customers.
Revenue Recognition. 
In general, for revenue not associated with financial instruments, guarantees and 
lease contracts, the Company applies the following steps when recognizing revenue from contracts with customers: (i) 
identify the contract, (ii) identify the performance obligations, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the 
transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied. Our 
contracts with customers are generally short-term in nature, typically due within one year or less or cancellable by us or our 
customer upon a short notice period. Performance obligations for our customer contracts are generally satisfied at a single 
point in time, typically when the transaction is complete, or over time. Descriptions of the Company’s revenue generating 
activities that are within the scope of the revenue recognition standard are described below.
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts are primarily comprised of maintenance fees, service fees, 
stop payment and insufficient funds fees. The Company’s performance obligation for service fees or other fees covering a 
period of time are generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. The 
Company’s performance obligations for transactional-based fees are generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a 
point in time.
Insurance commission and fee income
The Company earns commission income through production on behalf of insurance carriers and also earns 
fee income by providing complementary services such as collection of premiums. In most instances, the Company considers 
the performance obligation to be complete at the time the service was rendered.
Credit card interchange income
The Company records credit card interchange income at a point in time as card transactions occur. The 
Company’s performance obligation for these transactions is deemed to have occurred upon completion of each transaction. 
The amounts are included as a component of other income in the consolidated statements of income.
Gain or loss on sale of other assets and OREO
In the normal course of business, the Company recognizes the sale on other assets and OREO, along with 
any gain or loss, when control of the property transfers to the buyer through an executed contractual agreement. The 
transaction price is fixed, and the Company may finance a portion of the purchase price of the transferred asset on an 
infrequent basis.
Mortgage Banking Revenue.
This revenue category primarily reflects the Company’s mortgage production and 
sales, including fees and income derived from mortgages originated with the intent to sell and the impact of risk management 
activities associated with the mortgage pipeline. This revenue category also includes gains and losses on sales and changes in 
fair value for mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell and measured at fair value under the fair value option. Net 
interest income from mortgage loans is recorded in interest income.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
92

Income Taxes.
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change 
in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary 
differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation 
allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained 
in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax 
benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than 
not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company did not have any amount accrued with respect to uncertain income tax 
positions at December 31, 2024 and 2023.
The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters as a component of noninterest 
expense. There were no material penalties or related interest for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 or 2022. Federal 
income tax expense or benefit has been allocated to subsidiaries on a separate return basis.
Stock-Based Compensation.
The cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options, restricted 
stock and performance stock grants and/or units are measured using the fair value of the award on the grant date and is 
recognized over the service period. 
Other Investments.
The Company accounts for investments in limited partnerships, limited liability companies 
(“LLCs”), and other privately held companies using either the equity method of accounting or at amortized cost net of 
impairments and observable price changes. The accounting treatment depends upon the Company’s percentage ownership or 
degree of management influence.
Under the equity method of accounting, the Company records its initial investment at cost. Subsequently, the 
carrying amount of the investment is increased or decreased to reflect its share of income or loss of the investee. The 
Company’s recognition of earnings or losses from an equity method investment is based on its ownership percentage in the 
investee and the investee’s earnings for the reporting period and is recorded on a one-quarter lag.
All of the Company’s investments in limited partnerships, LLCs, and other companies are privately held, and their 
fair values are not readily available. Management evaluates the investments in investees for impairment based on the 
investee’s ability to generate cash through its operations or obtain alternative financing, and other subjective factors. There 
are inherent risks associated with investments in such companies, which may result in volatility in the consolidated 
statements of income in future periods.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, investments in limited partnerships, LLCs and other privately held companies 
totaled $23.1 million and $22.2 million, respectively, and were included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the 
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Investments in Tax Credit Entities.
As part of its Community Reinvestment Act responsibilities and due to their 
favorable economic characteristics, the Company invests in tax credit-motivated projects primarily in the markets it serves. 
These projects are directed at tax credits issued under Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”). The Company generates 
returns on tax credit motivated projects through the receipt of federal, and if applicable, state tax credits. The federal tax 
credits are recorded as an offset to the income tax provision in the year that they are earned under federal income tax law –
 over 10 to 15 years beginning in the year in which rental activity commences. These credits, if not used in the tax return for 
the year of origination, can be carried forward for 20 years.
The Company invests in a tax credit entity, usually an LLC, which owns the real estate. The Company receives a 
nonvoting interest in the entity that must be retained during the compliance period for the credits (15 years for Low-Income 
Housing Tax Credit programs). Control of the tax credit entity rests in the 0.1% interest general partner, who has the power 
and authority to make decisions that impact economic performance of the project and is required to oversee and manage the 
project. Due to the lack of any voting, economic, or managerial control, and due to the contractual reduction in the 
investment, the Company accounts for its investment by amortizing the investment, beginning at the issuance of the 
certificate of occupancy of the project, over the compliance period, as management believes any potential residual value in 
the real estate will have limited value. Amortization is included as a component of income tax expense and for the years 
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $1.7 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million respectively. The income tax 
credits and other income tax benefits recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $2.0 million, 
$2.3 million, and $2.4 million respectively, and was recorded in income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of 
Income. 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
93

The Company has the risk of credit recapture if the project does not maintain compliance during the compliance 
period. No such events have occurred to date. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had investments in tax credit 
entities of $8.8 million and $7.6 million, respectively, which are included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the 
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Earnings Per Share.
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated using the treasury method, 
under which basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares 
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares 
issuable under stock options and restricted stock awards and units.
Diluted income per common share considers common stock issuable under the assumed release of unvested 
restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance stock units, shares potentially issuable under the employee stock 
purchase plan, and the assumed exercise of stock options granted. The dilutive effect of share-based payment awards that are 
not deemed to be participating securities is calculated using the treasury stock method, which assumes that the proceeds from 
exercise are used to purchase common stock at the average market price for the period. Potentially dilutive common stock 
equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share in periods in which the effect would be 
anti-dilutive.
Effect of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
ASU No. 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities 
from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this Update affect accounting for acquired revenue contracts with 
customers in a business combination by addressing diversity in practice and inconsistency related to recognition of an 
acquired contract liability and payment terms and their effect on subsequent revenue recognized by the acquirer. The ASU is 
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. 
Implementation of this ASU did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2022-01, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) — Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method. The 
amendments in this Update clarify the accounting for and promote consistency in the reporting of hedge basis adjustments 
applicable to both a single hedged layer and multiple hedged layers. Additionally, this Update allows entities to elect to apply 
the portfolio layer method of hedge accounting in accordance with Topic 815. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning 
after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Implementation of this ASU did not materially 
impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) — Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage 
Disclosures. The amendments in this Update eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors in Subtopic 310-40, 
Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan 
refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Specifically, rather than 
applying the recognition and measurement guidance for TDRs, an entity must apply the loan refinancing and restructuring 
guidance in paragraphs 310-20-35-9 through 35-11 to determine whether a modification results in a new loan or a 
continuation of an existing loan. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update require that an entity disclose 
current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases within the scope 
of Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses—Measured at Amortized Cost. The ASU is effective for fiscal 
years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Implementation of this ASU 
did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) - Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848 — The 
amendments in this Update provide temporary relief during the transition period in complying with Update No. 2020-04, 
Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) - Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which 
provides optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform 
on financial reporting. The Board included a sunset provision within Topic 848 based on expectations of when the London 
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) would cease being published. At the time that Update 2020-04 was issued, the UK Financial 
Conduct Authority (FCA) had established its intent that it would no longer be necessary to persuade, or compel, banks to 
submit to LIBOR after December 31, 2021. As a result, the sunset provision was set for December 31, 2022 - 12 months after 
the expected cessation date of all currencies and tenors of LIBOR. In March 2021, the FCA announced that the intended 
cessation date of the overnight 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month tenors of USD LIBOR would be June 30, 2023, which is beyond the 
current sunset date of Topic 848.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
94

Because the current relief in Topic 848 may not cover a period of time during which a significant number of 
modifications may take place, the amendments in this Update defer the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to 
December 31, 2024, after which entities will no longer be permitted to apply the relief in Topic 848. The ASU is effective 
immediately. Implementation of this ASU did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2023-02, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax 
Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method — The amendments in this Update allow entities to elect to 
account for equity investments made primarily for the purpose of receiving income tax credits using the proportional 
amortization method, regardless of the tax credit program through which the investment earns income tax credits, if certain 
conditions are met. The amendments in this Update also eliminate certain LIHTC-specific guidance to align the accounting 
more closely for LIHTCs with the accounting for other equity investments in tax credit structures and require that the delayed 
equity contribution guidance apply only to tax equity investments accounted for using the proportional amortization method. 
The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. 
Implementation of this ASU did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure 
Update and Simplification Initiative — The amendments in this Update modify the disclosure or presentation requirements of 
a variety of Topics in the Codification. Certain of the amendments represent clarifications to or technical corrections of the 
current requirements. Because of the variety of Topics amended, a broad range of entities may be affected by one or more of 
those amendments. The effective date of this ASU will be coincident with the removal of the related disclosure from 
Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K. Implementation of this ASU did not materially impact the Company’s financial 
statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures — The 
amendments in this Update improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures 
about significant segment expenses. The amendments in this Update:
1.
Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, significant segment expenses that are regularly 
provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment 
profit or loss (collectively referred to as the “significant expense principle”);
2.
Require that a public entity disclose, on an annual and interim basis, an amount for other segment items by 
reportable segment and a description of its composition. The other segment items category is the difference between 
segment revenue less the segment expenses disclosed under the significant expense principle and each reported 
measure of segment profit or loss;
3.
Require that a public entity provide all annual disclosures about a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets 
currently required by Topic 280 in interim periods;
4.
Clarify that if the CODM uses more than one measure of a segment’s profit or loss in assessing segment 
performance and deciding how to allocate resources, a public entity may report one or more of those additional 
measures of segment profit. However, at least one of the reported segment profit or loss measures (or the single 
reported measure, if only one is disclosed) should be the measure that is most consistent with the measurement 
principles used in measuring the corresponding amounts in the public entity’s consolidated financial statements. In 
other words, in addition to the measure that is most consistent with the measurement principles under generally 
accepted accounting principles (GAAP), a public entity is not precluded from reporting additional measures of a 
segment’s profit or loss that are used by the CODM in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate 
resources;
5.
Require that a public entity disclose the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses 
the reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate 
resources, and
6.
Require that a public entity that has a single reportable segment provide all the disclosures required by the 
amendments in this Update and all existing segment disclosures in Topic 280.
The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years 
beginning after December 15, 2024. Retrospective application to all periods presented in the financial statements is required. 
Implementation of this ASU did not materially impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
95

Effect of Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures — The amendments in this 
Update, on an annual basis, require that public business entities (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and 
(2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. Specifically, public business 
entities are required to disclose a tabular reconciliation, using both percentages and reporting currency amounts, for specific 
listed categories. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Implementation of this ASU is not 
expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures 
(Subtopic 220-40) - Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses — The amendments in this Update require disclosure, in 
the notes to financial statements, of specified information about certain costs and expenses. The amendments in this Update 
require:
1.
Disclosure of the amounts of (a) purchases of inventory, (b) employee compensation, (c) depreciation, (d) intangible 
asset amortization, and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil and gas-producing 
activities;
2.
Include certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current generally accepted accounting 
principles (GAAP) in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements;
3.
Disclose a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately 
disaggregated quantitatively, and 
4.
Disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling 
expenses.
The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning 
after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and 
disclosures.
Note 2 — Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated using the treasury method. Under the treasury method, 
basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding 
during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under 
the Company’s stock and incentive compensation plans. Information regarding the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per 
common share is presented in the following table:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,
Numerator:
2024
2023
2022
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 $ 
87,715 
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
31,077,767 
 
30,822,993  
26,627,476 
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards
 
124,096 
 
108,612  
133,116 
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
 
31,201,863 
 
30,931,605  
26,760,592 
Basic earnings per common share
$ 
2.46 
$ 
2.72 $ 
3.29 
Diluted earnings per common share
 
2.45 
 
2.71  
3.28 
There were 322,628, 442,909 and 9,881 weighted average shares of anti-dilutive stock-based awards excluded from 
the calculation of earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. The awards were 
anti-dilutive primarily due to the exercise price, grant date fair value or purchase price of the stock awards exceeding the 
average market price of the Company’s stock during the respective periods. 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
96

Note 3 — Securities
The following table is a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value, including the allowance for credit 
losses and gross unrealized gains and losses, of available for sale, held to maturity and securities carried at fair value through 
income for the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024 
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Allowance 
for Credit 
Losses
Net 
Carrying 
Amount
Available for sale:
State and municipal securities
$ 299,642 
$ 
216 
$ (43,882) $ 255,976 
$ 
— 
$ 255,976 
Corporate bonds
 
83,041 
 
445 
 
(5,250)  
78,236 
 
— 
 
78,236 
U.S. treasury and government agency securities
 
14,742 
 
2 
 
(939)  
13,805 
 
— 
 
13,805 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
49,943 
 
— 
 
(5,659)  
44,284 
 
— 
 
44,284 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
598,380 
 
8 
 
(57,554)  
540,834 
 
— 
 
540,834 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
31,263 
 
— 
 
(2,697)  
28,566 
 
— 
 
28,566 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
160,422 
 
15 
 
(19,610)  
140,827 
 
— 
 
140,827 
Total
$ 1,237,433 
$ 
686 
$ (135,591) $ 1,102,528 
$ 
— 
$ 1,102,528 
Held to maturity:
State and municipal securities
$ 
11,145 
$ 
— 
$ 
(689) $ 
10,456 
$ 
(50) $ 
11,095 
Securities carried at fair value through income:
State and municipal securities(1)
$ 
6,515 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
6,512 
$ 
— 
$ 
6,512 
December 31, 2023
Available for sale:
State and municipal securities
$ 323,356 
$ 
210 
$ (41,440) $ 282,126 
$ 
— 
$ 282,126 
Corporate bonds
 
92,244 
 
80 
 
(8,689)  
83,635 
 
— 
 
83,635 
U.S. treasury and government agency securities
 
84,377 
 
3 
 
(4,740)  
79,640 
 
— 
 
79,640 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
104,459 
 
— 
 
(11,063)  
93,396 
 
— 
 
93,396 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
569,622 
 
— 
 
(63,120)  
506,502 
 
— 
 
506,502 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
39,386 
 
— 
 
(4,203)  
35,183 
 
— 
 
35,183 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
150,710 
 
— 
 
(20,566)  
130,144 
 
— 
 
130,144 
Asset-backed securities
 
43,521 
 
4 
 
(520)  
43,005 
 
— 
 
43,005 
Total
$ 1,407,675 
$ 
297 
$ (154,341) $ 1,253,631 
$ 
— 
$ 1,253,631 
Held to maturity:
State and municipal securities
$ 
11,678 
$ 
— 
$ 
(830) $ 
10,848 
$ 
(63) $ 
11,615 
Securities carried at fair value through income:
State and municipal securities(1)
$ 
6,815 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
6,808 
$ 
— 
$ 
6,808 
________________________
(1)
Securities carried at fair value through income have no unrealized gains or losses at the consolidated balance sheet dates as all changes in value have 
been recognized in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 5 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments for more information.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
97

Securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, aggregated by investment category 
and those individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months, and for 12 
months or more, were as follows.
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
Fair Value
Unrealized 
Loss
Fair Value
Unrealized 
Loss
Fair Value
Unrealized 
Loss
Available for sale:
State and municipal securities
$ 
18,349 
$ 
(346) $ 226,484 
$ (43,536) $ 244,833 
$ (43,882) 
Corporate bonds
 
7,450 
 
(550)  
59,443 
 
(4,700)  
66,893 
 
(5,250) 
U.S. treasury and government agency securities
 
10,062 
 
(52)  
3,423 
 
(887)  
13,485 
 
(939) 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
4,418 
 
(120)  
39,866 
 
(5,539)  
44,284 
 
(5,659) 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
148,383 
 
(1,296)  
386,414 
 
(56,258)  
534,797 
 
(57,554) 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
13,014 
 
(148)  
15,552 
 
(2,549)  
28,566 
 
(2,697) 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
14,884 
 
(291)  
109,416 
 
(19,319)  
124,300 
 
(19,610) 
Total
$ 216,560 
$ 
(2,803) $ 840,598 
$ (132,788) $ 1,057,158 
$ (135,591) 
Held to maturity:
State and municipal securities
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
10,456 
$ 
(689) $ 
10,456 
$ 
(689) 
December 31, 2023
Available for sale:
State and municipal securities
$ 
27,106 
$ 
(266) $ 246,442 
$ (41,174) $ 273,548 
$ (41,440) 
Corporate bonds
 
4,254 
 
(53)  
74,566 
 
(8,636)  
78,820 
 
(8,689) 
U.S. treasury and government agency securities
 
— 
 
— 
 
77,340 
 
(4,740)  
77,340 
 
(4,740) 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
— 
 
93,396 
 
(11,063)  
93,396 
 
(11,063) 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
60 
 
(5)  
506,442 
 
(63,115)  
506,502 
 
(63,120) 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
— 
 
35,183 
 
(4,203)  
35,183 
 
(4,203) 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
— 
 
130,144 
 
(20,566)  
130,144 
 
(20,566) 
Asset-backed securities
 
7,350 
 
(52)  
31,618 
 
(468)  
38,968 
 
(520) 
Total
$ 
38,770 
$ 
(376) $ 1,195,131 
$ (153,965) $ 1,233,901 
$ (154,341) 
Held to maturity:
State and municipal securities
$ 
4,717 
$ 
(447) $ 
6,131 
$ 
(383) $ 
10,848 
$ 
(830) 
At December 31, 2024, the Company had 530 individual securities that were in an unrealized loss position. 
Management evaluates available for sale debt securities in unrealized loss positions to determine whether the impairment is 
due to credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors. Consideration is given to (1) the extent to which the fair value is less 
than the cost, and (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the 
Company to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair 
value.
Management does not currently intend to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position and believes that it is more 
likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost. The fair value is expected 
to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. 
Accordingly, at December 31, 2024, management believes that the unrealized losses detailed in the previous table are due to 
noncredit-related factors, including changes in interest rates and other market conditions.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
98

The following tables present the activity in the allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities.
Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Balance at January 1, 
$ 
63 
$ 
899 
$ 
167 
(Recovery) provision for credit loss for held to maturity 
securities
 
(13)  
(836)  
732 
Balance at December 31, 
$ 
50 
$ 
63 
$ 
899 
Accrued interest of $5.3 million was not included in the calculation of the allowance or the amortized cost basis of 
the securities at either December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023. There were no past due or nonaccrual available for sale or 
held to maturity securities at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Proceeds from sales and calls, and related gross gains and losses of securities available for sale, are shown below. 
Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Proceeds from sales/calls
$ 
231,199 
$ 
291,189 
$ 
487,544 
Gross realized gains
 
357 
 
596 
 
3,810 
Gross realized losses
 
(15,156)  
(12,231)  
(2,146) 
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity at 
December 31, 2024, grouped by contractual maturity. Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and 
asset-backed securities, which do not have contractual payments due at a single maturity date, are shown separately. Actual 
maturities for mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities will differ from 
contractual maturities as a result of prepayments made on the underlying loans.
(Dollars in thousands)
Held to Maturity
Available for Sale
December 31, 2024
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
2,523 
$ 
2,488 
Due after one year through five years
 
5,153 
 
4,886 
 
43,673 
 
41,518 
Due after five years through ten years
 
5,992 
 
5,570 
 
208,675 
 
187,893 
Due after ten years
 
— 
 
— 
 
142,554 
 
116,118 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
— 
 
49,943 
 
44,284 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
— 
 
598,380 
 
540,834 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
— 
 
31,263 
 
28,566 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
— 
 
160,422 
 
140,827 
Total
$ 
11,145 
$ 
10,456 
$ 
1,237,433 
$ 
1,102,528 
The following table presents carrying amounts of securities pledged as collateral for deposits and repurchase 
agreements at the periods presented.
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Carrying value of securities pledged to secure public deposits
$ 
504,554 
$ 
421,273 
Carrying value of securities pledged to repurchase agreements
 
4,731 
 
5,477 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
99

Note 4 — Loans 
Loans consist of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Loans held for sale
$ 
10,494 
$ 
16,852 
LHFI:
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate(1)
$ 
2,477,431 
$ 
2,442,734 
Construction/land/land development
 
864,011 
 
1,070,225 
Residential real estate
 
1,857,589 
 
1,734,935 
Total real estate
 
5,199,031 
 
5,247,894 
Commercial and industrial
 
2,002,634 
 
2,059,460 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
349,081 
 
329,966 
Consumer
 
22,967 
 
23,624 
Total LHFI(2)
 
7,573,713 
 
7,660,944 
Less: Allowance for loan credit losses (“ALCL”)
 
91,060 
 
96,868 
LHFI, net
$ 
7,482,653 
$ 
7,564,076 
____________________________
(1)
Includes owner occupied commercial real estate of $975.9 million and $953.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(2)
Includes unamortized purchase accounting adjustment and net deferred loan fees of $9.8 million and $11.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, 
respectively.
Credit quality indicators. As part of the Company’s commitment to managing the credit quality of its loan portfolio, 
management annually and periodically updates and evaluates certain credit quality indicators, which include but are not 
limited to (i) weighted-average risk rating of the loan portfolio, (ii) net charge-offs, (iii) level of non-performing loans, (iv) 
level of classified loans (defined as substandard, doubtful and loss), and (v) the general economic conditions particularly in 
the cities and states in which the Company operates. The Company maintains an internal risk rating system where ratings are 
assigned to individual loans based on assessed risk. Loan risk ratings are the primary indicator of credit quality for the loan 
portfolio and are continually evaluated to ensure they are appropriate based on currently available information.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
100

The following is a summary description of the Company’s internal risk ratings:
•  Pass (1-6)
Loans within this risk rating are further categorized as follows:
Minimal risk (1)
Well-collateralized by cash equivalent instruments held by the Banks.
Moderate risk (2)
Borrowers with excellent asset quality and liquidity. Borrowers’ capitalization and 
liquidity exceed industry norms. Borrowers in this category have significant levels of 
liquid assets and have a low level of leverage.
Better than average risk (3)
Borrowers with strong financial strength and excellent liquidity that consistently 
demonstrate strong operating performance. Borrowers in this category generally have a 
sizable net worth that can be converted into liquid assets within 12 months.
Average risk (4)
Borrowers with sound credit quality and financial performance, including liquidity. 
Borrowers are supported by sufficient cash flow coverage generated through operations 
across the full business cycle.
Marginally acceptable risk (5) Loans generally meet minimum requirements for an acceptable loan in accordance with 
lending policy, but possess one or more attributes that cause the overall risk profile to 
be higher than the majority of newly approved loans.
Watch (6)
A passing loan with one or more factors that identify a potential weakness in the overall 
ability of the borrower to repay the loan. These weaknesses are generally mitigated by 
other factors that reduce the risk of delinquency or loss.
•  Special Mention (7)
This grade is intended to be temporary and includes borrowers whose credit quality has 
deteriorated and is at risk of further decline. 
•  Substandard (8)
This grade includes “Substandard” loans under regulatory guidelines. Substandard loans 
exhibit a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes debt repayment in accordance with 
contractual agreements, even though the loan may be performing. These obligations are 
characterized by the distinct possibility that a loss may be incurred if these weaknesses 
are not corrected and repayment may be dependent upon collateral liquidation or 
secondary source of repayment.
•  Doubtful (9)
This grade includes “Doubtful” loans under regulatory guidelines. Such loans are placed 
on nonaccrual status and repayment may be dependent upon collateral with no readily 
determinable valuation or valuations that are highly subjective in nature. Repayment for 
these loans is considered improbable based on currently existing facts and 
circumstances. 
•  Loss (0)
This grade includes “Loss” loans under regulatory guidelines. Loss loans are charged-
off or written down when repayment is not expected.
In connection with the review of the loan portfolio, the Company considers risk elements attributable to particular 
loan types or categories in assessing the quality of individual loans. The list of loans to be reviewed for possible individual 
evaluation consists of unsecured loans over 90 days past due, modified loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, 
loans greater than $100,000 in which the borrower has filed bankruptcy, collateralized loans 180 days or more past due, 
classified commercial loans, including non-accrual, over $100,000 with direct exposure, and consumer loans greater than 
$100,000 with a FICO score under 625. Loans under $50,000 will be evaluated collectively in designated pools unless a loss 
exposure has been identified. Some additional risk elements considered by loan type include:
•
for commercial real estate loans, the debt service coverage ratio, operating results of the owner in the case of owner-
occupied properties, the loan to value ratio, the age and condition of the collateral and the volatility of income, 
property value and future operating results typical of properties of that type;
•
for construction, land and land development loans, the perceived feasibility of the project, including the ability to 
sell developed lots or improvements constructed for resale or the ability to lease property constructed for lease, the 
quality and nature of contracts for presale or prelease, if any, experience and ability of the developer and loan to 
value ratio;
•
for residential mortgage loans, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the debt to 
income ratio and employment and income stability, the loan-to-value ratio, and the age, condition and marketability 
of the collateral;
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
101

•
for commercial and industrial loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the business in excess of operating 
expenses compared to loan repayment requirements), the operating results of the commercial, industrial or 
professional enterprise, the borrower’s business, professional and financial ability and expertise, the specific risks 
and volatility of income and operating results typical for businesses in that category and the value, nature and 
marketability of collateral; and
•
for mortgage warehouse loans, the borrower’s adherence to agency or investor underwriting guidelines, while the 
risk associated with the underlying consumer mortgage loan repayments, similar to other consumer loans, depends 
on the borrower’s financial stability and are more likely than commercial loans to be adversely affected by divorce, 
job loss, illness and other personal hardships.
Purchased loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination at the time of 
acquisition are purchase credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. An allowance for credit losses is determined using the same 
methodology as other individually evaluated loans. As a result of the BTH merger, the Company held approximately 
$12.3 million and $34.8 million of unpaid principal balance PCD loans at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Please see Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies included in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
for a description of our accounting policies related to purchased financial assets with credit deterioration.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
102

The following table reflects recorded investments in loans by credit quality indicator and origination year at 
December 31, 2024, and gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2024, excluding loans held for sale. Loans 
acquired are shown in the table by origination year, not merger date. The Company had an immaterial amount of revolving 
loans converted to term loans at December 31, 2024.
Commercial real estate:
Pass
$ 229,213 
$ 355,744 
$ 918,847 
$ 407,666 
$ 220,040 
$ 277,379 
$ 
54,391 
$ 2,463,280 
Special mention
 
1,209 
 
— 
 
— 
 
23 
 
907 
 
1,252 
 
238 
 
3,629 
Classified
 
949 
 
1,151 
 
1,155 
 
2,503 
 
1,539 
 
2,968 
 
257 
 
10,522 
Total commercial real estate loans
$ 231,371 
$ 356,895 
$ 920,002 
$ 410,192 
$ 222,486 
$ 281,599 
$ 
54,886 
$ 2,477,431 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
36 
$ 
193 
$ 
— 
$ 
251 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
480 
Construction/land/land development:
Pass
$ 153,847 
$ 206,970 
$ 290,035 
$ 123,645 
$ 14,903 
$ 
3,343 
$ 
47,982 
$ 840,725 
Special mention
 
— 
 
— 
 
547 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
145 
 
692 
Classified
 
1,366 
 
2,331 
 
10,552 
 
5,053 
 
731 
 
219 
 
2,342 
 
22,594 
Total construction/land/land development loans
$ 155,213 
$ 209,301 
$ 301,134 
$ 128,698 
$ 15,634 
$ 
3,562 
$ 
50,469 
$ 864,011 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Residential real estate:
Pass
$ 147,379 
$ 319,186 
$ 522,226 
$ 305,893 
$ 215,305 
$ 179,503 
$ 112,471 
$ 1,801,963 
Special mention
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
18,176 
 
124 
 
309 
 
— 
 
18,609 
Classified
 
1,962 
 
8,068 
 
17,898 
 
3,123 
 
748 
 
4,854 
 
364 
 
37,017 
Total residential real estate loans
$ 149,341 
$ 327,254 
$ 540,124 
$ 327,192 
$ 216,177 
$ 184,666 
$ 112,835 
$ 1,857,589 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
11 
$ 
— 
$ 
11 
Commercial and industrial:
Pass
$ 280,152 
$ 265,237 
$ 171,157 
$ 87,040 
$ 20,938 
$ 54,565 
$ 1,066,600 
$ 1,945,689 
Special mention
 
— 
 
70 
 
5,652 
 
39 
 
— 
 
545 
 
2,172 
 
8,478 
Classified
 
4,312 
 
6,706 
 
13,578 
 
1,022 
 
691 
 
375 
 
21,783 
 
48,467 
Total commercial and industrial loans
$ 284,464 
$ 272,013 
$ 190,387 
$ 88,101 
$ 21,629 
$ 55,485 
$ 1,090,555 
$ 2,002,634 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
346 
$ 
1,171 
$ 
2,103 
$ 
4,477 
$ 
162 
$ 
595 
$ 
13,933 
$ 
22,787 
Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit:
Pass
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 349,081 
$ 349,081 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Consumer:
Pass
$ 10,060 
$ 
4,290 
$ 
1,277 
$ 
271 
$ 
210 
$ 
32 
$ 
6,645 
$ 
22,785 
Classified
 
23 
 
64 
 
79 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
16 
 
182 
Total consumer loans
$ 10,083 
$ 
4,354 
$ 
1,356 
$ 
271 
$ 
210 
$ 
32 
$ 
6,661 
$ 
22,967 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
19 
$ 
47 
$ 
3 
$ 
— 
$ 
5 
$ 
288 
$ 
362 
Term Loans
Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Prior
Revolving 
Loans 
Amortized 
Cost Basis
Total
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
103

The following table reflects recorded investments in loans by credit quality indicator and origination year at 
December 31, 2023, and gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2023, excluding loans held for sale. Loans 
acquired are shown in the table by origination year, not merger date. The Company had an immaterial amount of revolving 
loans converted to term loans at December 31, 2023.
Commercial real estate:
Pass
$ 333,887 
$ 885,234 
$ 470,252 
$ 253,700 
$ 204,421 
$ 188,532 
$ 
77,993 
$ 2,414,019 
Special mention
 
— 
 
— 
 
308 
 
— 
 
— 
 
7,950 
 
— 
 
8,258 
Classified
 
726 
 
4,285 
 
3,212 
 
1,765 
 
524 
 
9,945 
 
— 
 
20,457 
Total commercial real estate loans
$ 334,613 
$ 889,519 
$ 473,772 
$ 255,465 
$ 204,945 
$ 206,427 
$ 
77,993 
$ 2,442,734 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
42 
$ 
— 
$ 
42 
Construction/land/land development:
Pass
$ 259,502 
$ 461,373 
$ 214,526 
$ 21,309 
$ 
7,221 
$ 25,460 
$ 
42,700 
$ 1,032,091 
Special mention
 
746 
 
10,462 
 
19,811 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
31,019 
Classified
 
191 
 
3,132 
 
41 
 
240 
 
662 
 
560 
 
2,289 
 
7,115 
Total construction/land/land development loans
$ 260,439 
$ 474,967 
$ 234,378 
$ 21,549 
$ 
7,883 
$ 26,020 
$ 
44,989 
$ 1,070,225 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Residential real estate:
Pass
$ 332,874 
$ 549,504 
$ 289,289 
$ 237,813 
$ 79,499 
$ 142,265 
$ 
91,972 
$ 1,723,216 
Special mention
 
250 
 
— 
 
— 
 
141 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
391 
Classified
 
689 
 
1,985 
 
1,439 
 
407 
 
1,367 
 
4,949 
 
492 
 
11,328 
Total residential real estate loans
$ 333,813 
$ 551,489 
$ 290,728 
$ 238,361 
$ 80,866 
$ 147,214 
$ 
92,464 
$ 1,734,935 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
5 
$ 
— 
$ 
22 
$ 
— 
$ 
27 
Commercial and industrial:
Pass
$ 399,485 
$ 272,152 
$ 160,636 
$ 36,995 
$ 57,562 
$ 48,523 
$ 1,035,021 
$ 2,010,374 
Special mention
 
498 
 
6,383 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
650 
 
7,531 
Classified
 
3,583 
 
1,676 
 
12,908 
 
371 
 
470 
 
222 
 
22,325 
 
41,555 
Total commercial and industrial loans
$ 403,566 
$ 280,211 
$ 173,544 
$ 37,366 
$ 58,032 
$ 48,745 
$ 1,057,996 
$ 2,059,460 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
203 
$ 
328 
$ 
233 
$ 
141 
$ 
539 
$ 
679 
$ 
9,710 
$ 
11,833 
Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit:
Pass
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 329,966 
$ 329,966 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Consumer:
Pass
$ 11,053 
$ 
3,567 
$ 
1,040 
$ 
399 
$ 
470 
$ 
17 
$ 
6,988 
$ 
23,534 
Classified
 
35 
 
42 
 
10 
 
— 
 
2 
 
— 
 
1 
 
90 
Total consumer loans
$ 11,088 
$ 
3,609 
$ 
1,050 
$ 
399 
$ 
472 
$ 
17 
$ 
6,989 
$ 
23,624 
Year-to-date gross charge-offs
$ 
3 
$ 
102 
$ 
7 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
2 
$ 
33 
$ 
147 
Term Loans
Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(Dollars in thousands)
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Prior
Revolving 
Loans 
Amortized 
Cost Basis
Total
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
104

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis at the dates indicated:
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
30-59 Days 
Past Due
60-89 Days 
Past Due
Loans Past 
Due 90 
Days or 
More
Total Past 
Due
Current 
Loans
Total 
Loans 
Receivable
Accruing 
Loans 90 
or More 
Days Past 
Due
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate 
$ 
3,576 
$ 
1,019 
$ 
957 
$ 
5,552 
$ 2,471,879 
$ 2,477,431 
$ 
— 
Construction/land/land development  
441 
 
33 
 
4,876 
 
5,350 
 
858,661 
 
864,011 
 
— 
Residential real estate
 
12,655 
 
5,219 
 
5,723 
 
23,597 
 1,833,992 
 1,857,589 
 
— 
Total real estate
 
16,672 
 
6,271 
 
11,556 
 
34,499 
 5,164,532 
 5,199,031 
 
— 
Commercial and industrial
 
3,873 
 
2,206 
 
1,596 
 
7,675 
 1,994,959 
 2,002,634 
 
— 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
349,081 
 
349,081 
 
— 
Consumer
 
199 
 
7 
 
57 
 
263 
 
22,704 
 
22,967 
 
— 
Total LHFI
$ 
20,744 
$ 
8,484 
$ 
13,209 
$ 
42,437 
$ 7,531,276 
$ 7,573,713 
$ 
— 
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
30-59 Days 
Past Due
60-89 Days 
Past Due
Loans Past 
Due 90 
Days or 
More
Total Past 
Due
Current 
Loans
Total 
Loans 
Receivable
Accruing 
Loans 90 
or More 
Days Past 
Due
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate
$ 
2,264 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
2,264 
$ 2,440,470 
$ 2,442,734 
$ 
— 
Construction/land/land development  
834 
 
27 
 
13 
 
874 
 1,069,351 
 1,070,225 
 
— 
Residential real estate
 
8,055 
 
1,326 
 
5,960 
 
15,341 
 1,719,594 
 1,734,935 
 
— 
Total real estate
 
11,153 
 
1,353 
 
5,973 
 
18,479 
 5,229,415 
 5,247,894 
 
— 
Commercial and industrial
 
1,221 
 
713 
 
5,417 
 
7,351 
 2,052,109 
 2,059,460 
 
— 
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
— 
 
329,966 
 
329,966 
 
— 
Consumer
 
200 
 
10 
 
3 
 
213 
 
23,411 
 
23,624 
 
— 
Total LHFI
$ 
12,574 
$ 
2,076 
$ 
11,393 
$ 
26,043 
$ 7,634,901 
$ 7,660,944 
$ 
— 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
105

The following tables detail activity in the ALCL by portfolio segment. Accrued interest of $32.6 million and 
$35.1 million was not included in the book value for the purposes of calculating the allowance at December 31, 2024 and 
2023, respectively. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to 
absorb losses in other categories.
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Commercial 
Real Estate
Construction/ 
Land/ Land 
Development
Residential 
Real Estate
Commercial 
and 
Industrial
Mortgage 
Warehouse 
Lines of 
Credit
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$ 
19,625 
$ 
9,990 
$ 
10,619 
$ 
55,330 
$ 
529 
$ 
775 
$ 
96,868 
Charge-offs
 
480 
 
— 
 
11 
 
22,787 
 
— 
 
362 
 
23,640 
Recoveries
 
530 
 
— 
 
16 
 
8,583 
 
— 
 
23 
 
9,152 
Provision(1)
 
(3,129) 
 
(2,592) 
 
1,830 
 
12,323 
 
(28) 
 
276 
 
8,680 
Ending balance
$ 
16,546 
$ 
7,398 
$ 
12,454 
$ 
53,449 
$ 
501 
$ 
712 
$ 
91,060 
Average balance
$ 2,485,800 
$ 1,035,871 
$ 1,799,963 
$ 2,087,361 
$ 420,665 
$ 22,962 
$ 7,852,622 
Net charge-offs to loan 
average balance 
 — %
 — %
 — %
 0.68 %
 — %
 1.48 %
 0.18 %
______________________
(1)
The $7.4 million provision for credit losses on the consolidated statement of income includes a $8.7 million provision for loan losses, and a 
$1.2 million and 13000 net benefit provision for off-balance sheet commitments and held to maturity securities credit losses, respectively, for the year 
ended December 31, 2024.
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Commercial 
Real Estate
Construction/ 
Land/ Land 
Development
Residential 
Real Estate
Commercial 
and 
Industrial
Mortgage 
Warehouse 
Lines of 
Credit
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$ 
19,772 
$ 
7,776 
$ 
8,230 
$ 
50,148 
$ 
379 
$ 
856 
$ 
87,161 
Charge-offs
 
42 
 
— 
 
27 
 
11,833 
 
— 
 
147 
 
12,049 
Recoveries
 
140 
 
3 
 
17 
 
4,068 
 
— 
 
14 
 
4,242 
Provision(1)
 
(245) 
 
2,211 
 
2,399 
 
12,947 
 
150 
 
52 
 
17,514 
Ending balance
$ 
19,625 
$ 
9,990 
$ 
10,619 
$ 
55,330 
$ 
529 
$ 
775 
$ 
96,868 
Average balance
$ 2,404,530 
$ 1,015,178 
$ 1,629,589 
$ 2,054,081 
$ 314,079 
$ 24,627 
$ 7,442,084 
Net charge-offs to loan 
average balance
 — %
 — %
 — %
 0.38 %
 — %
 0.54 %
 0.10 %
_________________________
(1)
The $16.8 million provision for credit losses on the consolidated statements of income includes a $17.5 million provision for loan credit losses, a 
$75,000 provision for off-balance sheet commitments and a $836,000 net benefit provision for held to maturity securities credit losses for the year 
ended December 31, 2023.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
106

Year Ended December 31, 2022
Commercial 
Real Estate
Construction/ 
Land/ Land 
Development
Residential 
Real Estate
Commercial 
and 
Industrial
Mortgage 
Warehouse 
Lines of 
Credit
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning Balance
$ 
13,425 
$ 
4,011 
$ 
6,116 
$ 
40,146 
$ 
340 
$ 
548 
$ 
64,586 
Allowance for loan 
credit losses - BTH 
merger (1)
 
1 
 
— 
 
— 
 
5,525 
 
— 
 
1 
 
5,527 
Charge-offs
 
166 
 
— 
 
91 
 
8,459 
 
— 
 
43 
 
8,759 
Recoveries
 
40 
 
211 
 
102 
 
3,825 
 
— 
 
16 
 
4,194 
Provision(2)
 
6,472 
 
3,554 
 
2,103 
 
9,111 
 
39 
 
334 
 
21,613 
Ending Balance
$ 
19,772 
$ 
7,776 
$ 
8,230 
$ 
50,148 
$ 
379 
$ 
856 
$ 
87,161 
Average Balance
$ 1,951,246 
$ 
708,758 
$ 1,143,190 
$ 1,675,719 
$ 420,639 
$ 20,913 
$ 5,920,465 
Net Charge-offs to Loan 
Average Balance
 0.01 %
 (0.03) %
 — %
 0.28 %
 — %
 0.13 %
 0.08 %
______________________
(1)
Excluded from the allowance is $10.8 million in PCD loans that were acquired in the merger with BTH that were added to the allowance and 
immediately written off. 
(2)
The $24.7 million provision for credit losses on the consolidated statement of income includes a $21.6 million provision for loan losses, a 
$2.3 million provision for off-balance sheet commitments and a $732,000 provision for held to maturity securities credit losses for the year ended 
December 31, 2022.
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans, which are individually evaluated 
to determine expected credit losses, and the related ALCL allocated to these loans. 
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial 
Real Estate
Construction/ 
Land/ Land 
Development
Residential 
Real Estate
Commercial 
and 
Industrial
Mortgage 
Warehouse 
Lines of 
Credit
Consumer
Total
Real Estate 
$ 
832 $ 
— $ 
16,804 $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 17,636 
Equipment 
 
—  
—  
—  
42  
—  
46  
88 
Total
$ 
832 $ 
— $ 
16,804 $ 
42 $ 
— $ 
46 $ 17,724 
ALCL Allocation
$ 
— $ 
— $ 
121 $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
121 
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial 
Real Estate
Construction/ 
Land/ Land 
Development
Residential 
Real Estate
Commercial 
and 
Industrial
Mortgage 
Warehouse 
Lines of 
Credit
Consumer
Total
Real Estate 
$ 
605 $ 
— $ 
4,029 $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
4,634 
Equipment
 
—  
—  
—  
119  
—  
—  
119 
Other
 
—  
—  
—  
258  
—  
—  
258 
Total
$ 
605 $ 
— $ 
4,029 $ 
377 $ 
— $ 
— $ 
5,011 
ALCL Allocation
$ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— $ 
— 
Collateral-dependent loans consist primarily of residential real estate, commercial real estate and commercial and 
industrial loans. These loans are individually evaluated when foreclosure is probable or when the repayment of the loan is 
expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the underlying collateral. In the case of commercial and 
industrial loans secured by equipment, the fair value of the collateral is estimated by third-party valuation experts. Loan 
balances are charged down to the underlying collateral value when they are deemed uncollectible. Note that the Company did 
not elect to use the collateral maintenance agreement practical expedient available under the current expected credit loss 
(“CECL”) guidance.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
107

Nonaccrual LHFI was as follows:
Nonaccrual With No 
Allowance for Credit Loss
Total Nonaccrual
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans secured by real estate:
December 31, 
2024
December 31, 
2023
December 31, 
2024
December 31, 
2023
Commercial real estate
$ 
832 $ 
746 
$ 
4,974 
$ 
786 
Construction/land/land development
 
—  
96 
 
18,505 
 
305 
Residential real estate
 
16,048  
5,695 
 
36,221 
 
13,037 
Total real estate
 
16,880  
6,537 
 
59,700 
 
14,128 
Commercial and industrial
 
42  
4,706 
 
15,120 
 
15,897 
Consumer
 
46  
— 
 
182 
 
90 
Total nonaccrual loans
$ 
16,968 $ 
11,243 
$ 
75,002 
$ 
30,115 
All interest formerly accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual status is reversed from interest income. 
Subsequent receipts on nonaccrual loans are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income is recorded only after 
principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts 
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. 
No interest income was recorded on nonaccrual loans while they were considered nonaccrual during the years ended 
December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
The Company elects the fair value option for recording residential mortgage loans held for sale in accordance with 
U.S. GAAP. The Company had zero nonaccrual mortgage loans held for sale that were recorded using the fair value option 
election at both December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The tables below summarize modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty by loan and 
modification type during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Amortized Cost Basis at December 31, 2024
Term Extension
Combination: 
Term Extension and Interest 
Rate Reduction
Other-Than-Insignificant 
Payment Delay
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate
$ 
2,552 
 0.10 % $ 
— 
 — % $ 
— 
 — %
Construction/land/land 
development
 
340 
 0.04 
 
— 
 — 
 
— 
 — 
Residential real estate
 
644 
 0.03 
 
128 
 0.01 
 
449 
 0.02 
Total real estate
 
3,536 
 0.07 
 
128 
 — 
 
449 
 0.01 
Commercial and industrial(1)
 
17,671 
 0.88 
 
— 
 — 
 
34 
 — 
Consumer
 
— 
 — 
 
3 
 0.01 
 
— 
 — 
Total
$ 
21,207 
 0.28 
$ 
131 
 — 
$ 
483 
 0.01 
____________________________
(1)
Does not include the loans impacted by the questioned activity as a result of not meeting the modification criteria as described in the Accounting 
Standards Codification 310-10-50-36, “Modifications”.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
108

Amortized Cost Basis at December 31, 2023
Term Extension
Combination:
Term Extension and Interest 
Rate Reduction
Other-Than-Insignificant 
Payment Delay
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Amortized 
Cost
% of Loans
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate
$ 
7,845 
 0.32 % $ 
— 
 — % $ 
428 
 0.02 %
Construction/land/land 
development
 
3,979 
 0.37 
 
— 
 — 
 
— 
 — 
Residential real estate
 
2,599 
 0.15 
 
190 
 0.01 
 
98 
 0.01 
Total real estate
 
14,423 
 0.27 
 
190 
 — 
 
526 
 0.01 
Commercial and industrial
 
21,093 
 1.02 
 
1,072 
 0.05 
 
53 
 — 
Total
$ 
35,516 
 0.46 
$ 
1,262 
 0.02 
$ 
579 
 0.01 
The following tables describe the financial effects of the modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial 
difficulty during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Interest Rate Reduction
Term Extension
Other-Than-Insignificant 
Payment Delay
Commercial real estate
N/A
Added a weighted average 11.2 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
N/A
Construction/land/land 
development
N/A
Added a weighted average 7.5 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
N/A
Residential real estate
Reduced weighted average 
contractual interest rate from 
9.0% to 8.0%
Added a weighted average 10.4 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
Delayed payment of weighted 
average 7 months
Commercial and industrial(1) N/A
Added a weighted average 7.6 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
Delayed payment of weighted 
average 2 months
Consumer
Reduced weighted average 
contractual interest rate from 
9.5% to 6.0%
Added a weighted average 4.9 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
N/A
____________________________
(1)
Does not include the loans impacted by the questioned activity as a result of not meeting the modification criteria as described in the Accounting 
Standards Codification 310-10-50-36, “Modifications”.
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Interest Rate Reduction
Term Extension
Other-Than-Insignificant 
Payment Delay
Commercial real estate
N/A
Added a weighted average 10.7 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
Delayed payment of weighted 
average 6 months
Construction/land/land 
development
N/A
Added a weighted average 13.0 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
N/A
Residential real estate
Reduced weighted average 
contractual interest rate from 
8.8% to 6.0%
Added a weighted average 32.8 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
Delayed payment of weighted 
average 2 months
Commercial and industrial
Reduced weighted average 
contractual interest rate from 
9.9% to 8.9%
Added a weighted average 9.5 
months to the life of the modified 
loans
Delayed payment of weighted 
average 6 months
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
109

The following table depicts the performance of loans that have been modified during the years ended December 31, 
2024 and 2023.
Payment Status (Amortized Cost Basis)
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
Current
30-89 Days Past Due
90 Days or More Past 
Due 
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate 
$ 
2,552 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Construction/land/land development
 
340 
 
— 
 
— 
Residential real estate
 
1,086 
 
100 
 
35 
Total real estate
 
3,978 
 
100 
 
35 
Commercial and industrial(1)
 
16,193 
 
1,511 
 
— 
Consumer
 
— 
 
3 
 
— 
Total LHFI
$ 
20,171 
$ 
1,614 
$ 
35 
____________________________
(1)
Does not include the loans impacted by the questioned activity as a result of not meeting the modification criteria as described in the Accounting 
Standards Codification 310-10-50-36, “Modifications”.
Payment Status (Amortized Cost Basis)
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Current
30-89 Days Past Due
90 Days or More Past 
Due 
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate 
$ 
8,272 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Construction/land/land development
 
3,979 
 
— 
 
— 
Residential real estate
 
2,484 
 
120 
 
282 
Total real estate
 
14,735 
 
120 
 
282 
Commercial and industrial
 
22,219 
 
— 
 
— 
Total LHFI
$ 
36,954 
$ 
120 
$ 
282 
At December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, the Company had $35,000 and $1.6 million funding commitments 
for loans in which the terms were modified as a result of the borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, respectively.
The table below provides the details of loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that were modified 
within the last twelve months and defaulted during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
At or For The Year Ended December 31, 2024
Term Extension
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized Cost 
Default Amount 
Residential real estate
$ 
35 
$ 
35 
Commercial and industrial(1)
 
819 
 
7,364 
Total
$ 
854 
$ 
7,399 
____________________________
(1)
Does not include the loans impacted by the questioned activity as a result of not meeting the modification criteria as described in the Accounting 
Standards Codification 310-10-50-36, “Modifications”.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
110

At or For The Year Ended December 31, 2023
Term Extension
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized Cost
Default Amount 
Residential real estate
$ 
282 
$ 
282 
Commercial and industrial
 
— 
 
10 
Total
$ 
282 
$ 
292 
A payment default is defined as a loan that was 90 or more days past due. The Company monitors the performance 
of modified loans on an ongoing basis. In the event of subsequent default, the ALCL is assessed on the basis of an individual 
evaluation of each loan. The modifications made during the periods presented did not significantly impact the Company’s 
determination of the allowance for credit losses.
Note 5 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the exchange price that is expected to be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) 
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on 
the measurement date. Certain assets and liabilities are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements at fair 
value. Some are recorded on a recurring basis and some on a nonrecurring basis.
The Company utilizes fair value measurement to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to 
determine fair value disclosures. The determination of fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. 
In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are 
consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach to estimate the fair values of its financial 
instruments. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied.
A hierarchy for fair value has been established, which categorizes the valuation techniques into three levels used to 
measure fair value. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 - Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Fair value is based on significant other observable inputs that are generally determined based on a single 
price for each financial instrument provided to the Company by an unrelated third-party pricing service and is based on one 
or more of the following:
•
Quoted prices for similar, but not identical, assets or liabilities in active markets;
•
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active;
•
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as interest rate and yield curves, volatilities, prepayment 
speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates; and
•
Other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market inputs.
Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant and unobservable in the market. 
These instruments are valued using the best information available, some of which is internally developed, and reflects the 
Company’s own assumptions about the risk premiums that market participants would generally require and the assumptions 
they would use. These estimates can be inherently uncertain.
There were no transfers between fair value reporting levels for any period presented.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
111

Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities Recorded on a Recurring Basis
The following tables summarize financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis at 
December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy 
utilized to measure fair value. There were no changes in the valuation techniques during 2024 or 2023.
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
State and municipal securities
$ 
— 
$ 
221,222 
$ 
34,754 
$ 
255,976 
Corporate bonds
 
— 
 
77,236 
 
1,000 
 
78,236 
U.S. government agency securities
 
— 
 
13,805 
 
— 
 
13,805 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
44,284 
 
— 
 
44,284 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
540,834 
 
— 
 
540,834 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
28,566 
 
— 
 
28,566 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
140,827 
 
— 
 
140,827 
Securities available for sale
 
— 
 
1,066,774 
 
35,754 
 
1,102,528 
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
— 
 
— 
 
6,512 
 
6,512 
Loans held for sale
 
— 
 
10,494 
 
— 
 
10,494 
Rabbi Trust assets
 
509 
 
— 
 
— 
 
509 
Other assets - derivatives
 
— 
 
15,595 
 
— 
 
15,595 
Total recurring fair value measurements - assets
$ 
509 
$ 
1,092,863 
$ 
42,266 
$ 
1,135,638 
Other liabilities - derivatives
 
— 
 
(14,959)  
— 
 
(14,959) 
Total recurring fair value measurements - liabilities
$ 
— 
$ 
(14,959) $ 
— 
$ 
(14,959) 
December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
State and municipal securities
$ 
— 
$ 
232,679 
$ 
49,447 
$ 
282,126 
Corporate bonds
 
— 
 
82,635 
 
1,000 
 
83,635 
U.S. treasury securities
 
55,480 
 
— 
 
— 
 
55,480 
U.S. government agency securities
 
— 
 
24,160 
 
— 
 
24,160 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
93,396 
 
— 
 
93,396 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
 
— 
 
506,502 
 
— 
 
506,502 
Commercial collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
35,183 
 
— 
 
35,183 
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations
 
— 
 
130,144 
 
— 
 
130,144 
Asset-backed securities
 
— 
 
43,005 
 
— 
 
43,005 
Securities available for sale
 
55,480 
 
1,147,704 
 
50,447 
 
1,253,631 
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
— 
 
— 
 
6,808 
 
6,808 
Loans held for sale
 
— 
 
16,852 
 
— 
 
16,852 
Mortgage servicing rights
 
— 
 
— 
 
15,637 
 
15,637 
Other assets - derivatives
 
— 
 
20,487 
 
— 
 
20,487 
Total recurring fair value measurements - assets
$ 
55,480 
$ 
1,185,043 
$ 
72,892 
$ 
1,313,415 
Other liabilities - derivatives
 
— 
 
(18,300)  
— 
 
(18,300) 
Total recurring fair value measurements - liabilities
$ 
— 
$ 
(18,300) $ 
— 
$ 
(18,300) 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
112

The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended 
December 31, 2024 and 2023, are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
MSR Asset
Securities 
Available for Sale
Securities at Fair 
Value Through 
Income
Balance at January 1, 2024
$ 
15,637 
$ 
50,447 
$ 
6,808 
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings:
Mortgage banking revenue
 
450 
 
— 
 
— 
Other noninterest income
 
— 
 
— 
 
3 
Gain recognized in AOCI
 
— 
 
272 
 
— 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
Purchases
 
— 
 
5,396 
 
— 
Sales
 
(16,087)  
— 
 
— 
Settlements
 
— 
 
(20,361)  
(299) 
Balance at December 31, 2024
$ 
— 
$ 
35,754 
$ 
6,512 
(Dollars in thousands)
MSR Asset
Securities 
Available for Sale
Securities at Fair 
Value Through 
Income
Balance at January 1, 2023
$ 
20,824 
$ 
55,769 
$ 
6,368 
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings:
Mortgage banking revenue(1)
 
(4,089)  
— 
 
— 
Other noninterest income
 
— 
 
— 
 
725 
Loss recognized in AOCI
 
— 
 
(193)  
— 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
Originations
 
708 
 
— 
 
— 
Sales
 
(1,806)  
— 
 
— 
Settlements
 
— 
 
(5,129)  
(285) 
Balance at December 31, 2023
$ 
15,637 
$ 
50,447 
$ 
6,808 
___________________________
(1)
Total mortgage banking revenue includes changes in fair value due to market changes and run-off.
The Company obtains fair value measurements for securities available for sale and securities at fair value through 
income from an independent pricing service; therefore, quantitative unobservable inputs are unknown. 
The following methodologies were used to measure the fair value of financial assets and liabilities valued on a 
recurring basis:
Securities Available for Sale
Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 inputs. For 
Level 1 securities, the Company obtains the fair value measurements for those identical assets from an independent pricing 
service. For Level 2 securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair 
value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury 
yield curve, live trading levels, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security's terms and 
conditions, among other things. In order to ensure the fair values are consistent with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and 
Disclosures, the Company periodically checks the fair value by comparing them to other pricing sources, such as Bloomberg 
LP. The third-party pricing service is subject to an annual review of internal controls in accordance with the Statement on 
Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16, which was made available to the Company. In certain cases where Level 2 
inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. For Level 3 securities, the Company 
determines the fair value of the instruments based on their callability, putability and prepay optionality. Putable instruments 
are valued at book value, non-putable instruments are priced mainly using a present value calculation based on the spread to 
the yield curve.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
113

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”)
The Company sold substantially all of its MSR asset and recorded a $410,000 gain on the sale during the year ended 
December 31, 2024. There were no MSR assets recognized or recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, and the 
carrying value of the MSR asset is zero at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2023, the carrying amounts of the MSR 
asset equal fair value, which are determined using a discounted cash flow valuation model. The significant assumptions used 
to value MSR assets were as follows:
December 31, 2023
Range
Weighted Average(1)
Prepayment speeds
7.49% - 8.50%
 8.10 %
Discount rates
10.25% - 12.75%
 10.31 %
__________________________
(1)
The weighted average was calculated with reference to the principal balance of the underlying mortgages.
There were significant market-driven fluctuations in the assumptions listed above. Typically, loans with higher 
average coupon rates have a greater likelihood of prepayment during comparatively low interest rate environments, while 
loans with lower average coupon rates have a lower likelihood of prepayment. Estimating these assumptions within ranges 
that market participants would use in determining the fair value of the MSR asset requires significant management judgment.
Derivatives
Fair values for interest rate swap agreements and interest rate lock commitments are based upon the amounts that 
would be required to settle the contracts. Fair values for risk participations and loan sale commitments are based on the fair 
values of the underlying mortgage loans or securities and the probability of such commitments being exercised. Significant 
management judgment and estimation is required in determining these fair value measurements.
Fair Values of Assets Recorded on a Recurring Basis for which the Fair Value Option has been Elected
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis due to the Company’s election to adopt fair value 
accounting treatment for those assets. For most of these assets, this election allows for a more effective offset of the changes 
in fair values of the assets and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying 
with the requirements for hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. For interest-earning assets for 
which the fair value has been elected, the earned current contractual interest payment is recognized in interest income. 
Compensation (benefit) expense associated with the deferred compensation liabilities is offset by loss (gain) from the related 
security investments Rabbi Trust. The net effect of investment income or loss and related compensation expense or benefit 
has no impact on the Company’s net income or cash balances. At December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, there were no 
gains or losses recorded attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk. The following tables summarize the 
difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance, amortized cost or contributions, respectively, for financial 
instruments for which the fair value option has been elected:
December 31, 2024
(Dollars in thousands)
Aggregate Fair 
Value
Principal Balance/
Amortized Cost/
Contributions
Difference
Loans held for sale(1)
$ 
10,494 
$ 
10,228 
$ 
266 
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
6,512 
 
6,515 
 
(3) 
Rabbi Trust assets
 
509 
 
499 
 
10 
Total
$ 
17,515 
$ 
17,242 
$ 
273 
____________________________
(1)
There were no loans held for sale that were designated as nonaccrual or 90 days or more past due at December 31, 2024.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
114

December 31, 2023
(Dollars in thousands)
Aggregate Fair 
Value
Principal Balance/
Amortized Cost/
Contributions
Difference
Loans held for sale(1)
$ 
16,852 
$ 
16,475 
$ 
377 
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
6,808 
 
6,815 
 
(7) 
Total
$ 
23,660 
$ 
23,290 
$ 
370 
____________________________
(1)
There were no of loans held for sale that were designated as nonaccrual or 90 days or more past due at December 31, 2023.
Changes in the fair value of assets for which the Company elected the fair value option are classified in the 
Consolidated Statements of Income line items reflected in the following table:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Changes in fair value included in noninterest income:
2024
2023
2022
Mortgage banking revenue (loans held for sale)(1)
$ 
(111) $ 
(66) $ 
(517) 
Other income:
Securities carried at fair value through income
 
4 
 
726 
 
(854) 
Total fair value option impact on noninterest income
$ 
(107) $ 
660 
$ 
(1,371) 
Changes in fair value included in noninterest expense:
Rabbi Trust assets
$ 
6 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
Deferred compensation liabilities related to Rabbi Trust assets(2)
 
(6)  
— 
 
— 
Total fair value option impact on noninterest expense
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
$ 
— 
____________________________
(1)
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the fair value option impact on noninterest income is offset by the derivative gain/loss recognized in 
noninterest income. Please see Note 9 — Mortgage Banking for more detail.
(2)
Please see the Rabbi Trust section below for more detail on its impact on the Company’s net income. 
The following methodologies were used to measure the fair value of financial assets valued on a recurring basis for 
which the fair value option was elected:
Loans Held for Sale
Fair values for loans held for sale are established using anticipated sale prices for loans allocated to a sale 
commitment, and those unallocated to a commitment are valued based on the interest rate and term for similar loans 
allocated. The Company believes the fair value approximates an exit price.
Securities at Fair Value through Income 
Securities carried at fair value through income are valued using a discounted cash flow with a credit spread applied 
to each instrument based on the creditworthiness of each issuer. Credit spreads ranged from 83 to 227 basis points at both 
December 31, 2024, and 2023. The Company believes the fair value approximates an exit price.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
115

Rabbi Trust 
The Company maintains a Rabbi Trust to fund obligations under the Origin Bank Nonqualified Deferred 
Compensation Plan (the “DCP”). Investments within the Rabbi Trust consist of various mutual funds based on the 
participants individual investment elections. The Company has elected the fair value option for these investments to align 
their valuation with the related deferred compensation liabilities. Fair values for the Rabbi Trust investments are valued at the 
daily closing price as reported by the mutual fund. These assets are included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in 
the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, while the offsetting deferred compensation liabilities are included in accrued 
expenses and other liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the Rabbi Trust assets and changes in the deferred compensation 
obligation are recognized in salaries and employee benefits in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income, but 
because the fair value adjustments for the assets and the change in the liabilities offset each other, the net impact to the 
Company’s net income is zero.
Fair Value of Assets Recorded on a Nonrecurring Basis
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions
The Company’s non-marketable equity securities held in other financial institutions are within Level 2 of the fair 
value hierarchy and do not have readily determinable fair values. Securities with limited marketability, such as stock in the 
FRBD or the FHLB, are carried at cost, less impairment, if any, and total $28.2 million and $29.3 million at December 31, 
2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company’s remaining equity investments in other financial institutions, excluding FRBD 
and FHLB, totaling $43.4 million and $25.9 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, qualify for the 
practicability exception under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01 due to having illiquid markets and are carried 
at cost, less impairment, plus or minus any observable price changes. We believe these amounts approximate the fair value of 
these securities. To date, no impairment has been recorded on the Company's investments in equity securities that do not have 
readily determinable fair values. During the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, the Company observed a price 
change in multiple orderly transactions for identical equity securities in one of the Company’s equity securities and adjusted 
the Company’s basis upwards by $5.2 million and $10.1 million, respectively.
Individually Evaluated Loans with Credit Losses 
Loans for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to 
contractual terms are measured to determine if any credit loss exists. Allowable methods for determining the amount of credit 
loss include estimating the fair value using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans and a discounted cash 
flow methodology for other evaluated loans that are not collateral dependent. If the loan is identified as collateral-dependent, 
the fair value method of measuring the amount of credit loss is utilized. Evaluating the fair value of the collateral for 
collateral-dependent loans requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor 
to the value. If the loan is not collateral-dependent, the discounted cash flow method is utilized, which involves assumptions 
and judgments as to credit risk, prepayment risk, liquidity risk, default rates, loss severity, payment speeds, collateral values 
and discount rate. Loans that have experienced a credit loss with specific allocated losses are within Level 3 of the fair value 
hierarchy when the credit loss is determined using the fair value method. The fair value of collateral-dependent loans that 
have specific allocated reserves was approximately $4.5 million and $3.8 million at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 
2023, respectively.
Non-Financial Assets
Held for sale OREO properties, which include foreclosed assets and bank-owned real estate which the Company is 
no longer utilizing and intends to sell, are the only non-financial assets valued on a nonrecurring basis that are initially 
recorded by the Company at fair value, less estimated costs to sell. At foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to 
sell, of the real estate acquired is less than the Company’s recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized 
through a charge to the ALCL. Similarly, real estate-based properties that were formerly operating as bank offices are 
evaluated at the time the decision is made to sell, and if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the property is less than 
the Company’s net book value, a write-down is recognized. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by 
management, and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The carrying value and fair value of 
foreclosed assets and bank-owned real estate held for sale was estimated using Level 3 inputs based on observable market 
data and was $3.6 million and $3.9 million at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively. At December 31, 
2024, and December 31, 2023, the Company had $5.1 million and zero, respectively, principal amounts of residential 
mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
116

Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value
The carrying value and estimated fair values of financial instruments not recorded at fair value are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Financial assets:
Level 1 inputs:
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 
470,249 
$ 
470,249 
$ 
280,441 
$ 
280,441 
Level 2 inputs:
Non-marketable equity securities held in other financial 
institutions
 
71,643 
 
71,643 
 
55,190 
 
55,190 
Accrued interest and loan fees receivable
 
38,901 
 
38,901 
 
41,688 
 
41,688 
Level 3 inputs:
Securities held to maturity
 
11,095 
 
10,456 
 
11,615 
 
10,848 
LHFI, net
 
7,482,653 
 
7,209,866 
 
7,564,076 
 
7,177,720 
Financial liabilities:
Level 2 inputs:
Deposits
 
8,223,120 
 
8,217,564 
 
8,251,125 
 
8,240,520 
FHLB advances, repurchase agreements and other 
borrowings
 
12,460 
 
12,203 
 
83,598 
 
83,187 
Subordinated indebtedness
 
159,943 
 
159,928 
 
194,279 
 
186,251 
Accrued interest payable
 
8,033 
 
8,033 
 
12,272 
 
12,272 
Note 6 — Premises and Equipment
Major classifications of premises and equipment are summarized below:
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Land, buildings and improvements
$ 
105,331 $ 
106,300 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
 
48,299  
35,560 
Leasehold improvements
 
44,806  
25,079 
Construction in process
 
423  
19,390 
Total premises and equipment
 
198,859  
186,329 
Accumulated depreciation
 
(72,239)  
(67,351) 
Premises and equipment, net
$ 
126,620 $ 
118,978 
Depreciation expense for premises and equipment totaled $8.8 million, $8.0 million and $6.8 million for the years 
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
117

Note 7 — Leases
The Company leases certain real estate, as well as certain equipment, under non-cancelable operating leases that 
expire at various dates through 2052.
The consolidated balance sheets detail and components of the Company’s lease expense were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Operating lease right of use assets (included in Accrued interest receivable and other 
assets)
$ 
52,832 
$ 
47,619 
Operating lease liabilities (included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities)
 
55,999 
 
48,917 
Finance lease right of use assets (included in Premises and equipment, net)
 
1,862 
 
2,183 
Finance lease liabilities (included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities)
 
1,932 
 
2,244 
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) - operating leases
11.18
11.59
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases
 4.21 %
 4.12 %
Years Ended
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 
2024
December 31, 
2023
December 31, 
2022
Lease expense:
Operating lease expense
$ 
7,916 
$ 
7,884 
$ 
5,344 
Other lease expense
 
356 
 
360 
 
365 
Total lease expense
 
8,272 
 
8,244 
 
5,709 
Sublease income
 
339 
 
231 
 
136 
Net lease expense
$ 
7,933 
$ 
8,013 
$ 
5,573 
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
$ 
11,454 
$ 
20,568 
$ 
13,428 
Maturities of operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2024, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
2025
$ 
7,609 
2026
 
7,103 
2027
 
7,015 
2028
 
6,825 
2029
 
5,800 
Thereafter
 
37,513 
Total lease payments
 
71,865 
Less: Imputed interest
 
15,866 
Total lease obligations
$ 
55,999 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
118

The Company subleases commercial office spaces to tenants under operating leases. Future lease payments at 
December 31, 2024, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
2025
$ 
289 
2026
 
294 
2027
 
299 
2028
 
244 
2029
 
230 
Thereafter
 
1,064 
Total
$ 
2,420 
Supplemental cash flow related to leases was as follows:
Years Ended
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Cash paid for operating leases
$ 
7,375 
$ 
8,131 
Note 8 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
There were zero changes to the carrying amount of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.
The components of the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
Gross Carrying 
Amount at Year 
End
Net Carrying 
Amount at the 
Beginning of the 
Year
Accumulated 
Amortization
Net Carrying 
Amount at Year 
End
Goodwill
$ 
128,679 
N/A
$ 
128,679 
Other intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles
$ 
38,356 
$ 
27,412 
$ 
(17,010) $ 
21,346 
Relationship based intangibles
 
19,650 
 
12,281 
 
(8,888)  
10,762 
Tradename
 
818 
 
637 
 
(272)  
546 
Naming rights
 
5,250 
 
5,122 
 
(431)  
4,819 
Total
$ 
64,074 
$ 
45,452 
$ 
(26,601) $ 
37,473 
December 31, 2023
Goodwill
$ 
128,679 
N/A
$ 
128,679 
Other intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles
$ 
38,356 
$ 
34,940 
$ 
(10,944) $ 
27,412 
Relationship based intangibles
 
19,650 
 
13,710 
 
(7,369)  
12,281 
Tradename
 
818 
 
727 
 
(181)  
637 
Non-compete
 
903 
 
452 
 
(903)  
— 
Naming rights
 
5,250 
 
— 
 
(128)  
5,122 
Total
$ 
64,977 
$ 
49,829 
$ 
(19,525) $ 
45,452 
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired naming and logo rights on certain facilities and 
properties for $5.3 million for a defined period of time.
Amortization expense on other intangible assets totaled $8.0 million, $9.6 million and $5.5 million for the years 
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and was included as a component of other noninterest expense in the 
consolidated statements of income.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
119

Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets remaining at December 31, 2024, was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2025
$ 
6,677 
2026
 
5,619 
2027
 
4,729 
2028
 
4,008 
2029
 
3,441 
Thereafter
 
12,999 
Total
$ 
37,473 
Note 9 — Mortgage Banking
The following table presents the Company’s revenue from mortgage banking operations:
(Dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
Mortgage banking revenue
2024
2023
2022
Origination
$ 
528 $ 
483 $ 
774 
Gain on sale of loans held for sale
 
4,928  
3,111  
4,889 
Originations of MSR
 
—  
708  
2,286 
Servicing
 
744  
3,739  
5,643 
Total gross mortgage revenue
 
6,200  
8,041  
13,592 
MSR asset valuation adjustments, net
 
450  
(4,089)  
1,219 
Gain on sale of MSR asset
 
410  
—  
— 
Mortgage HFS and pipeline fair value adjustment
 
(1)  
(53)  
(1,352) 
MSR asset hedge impact
 
(479)  
(543)  
(6,737) 
Mortgage banking revenue
$ 
6,580 $ 
3,356 $ 
6,722 
During 2023 and 2022, management used forward-settling mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury futures to 
mitigate the impact of changes in fair value of the MSR asset. See Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments for further 
information. Due to the timing of the MSR asset sale, the MSR asset hedge impact in 2024 primarily reflected the financial 
effects of the MSR asset sale rather than ongoing hedging activities.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Activity in the MSR asset was as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Balance at beginning of year
$ 
15,637 
$ 
20,824 $ 
16,220 
Servicing acquired in BTH merger
 
— 
 
—  
1,099 
Addition of servicing rights
 
— 
 
708  
2,286 
Settlement of sale of MSR asset
 
(16,087)  
(1,806)  
— 
Valuation adjustment, net of amortization
 
450 
 
(4,089)  
1,219 
Balance at end of year
$ 
— 
$ 
15,637 $ 
20,824 
The Company sold substantially all of its MSR asset and recorded a $410,000 gain on the sale during the year ended 
December 31, 2024. There were no MSR assets recognized or recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024, and the 
Company is no longer retaining servicing on sold loans.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
120

During the second half of 2022, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its GNMA MSR asset portfolio, 
which met all final sale conditions in early 2023. The Company sold $1.8 million in GNMA MSR assets, with no significant 
gain or loss realized, and derecognized the related GNMA repurchase asset and offsetting liability during the quarter ended 
March 31, 2023.
Prior to the sale of the Company’s MSR asset, the Company received annual servicing fee income approximating 
0.25% of the outstanding balance of the underlying loans. In connection with the Company's activities as a servicer of 
mortgage loans, the investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to the Company’s assets for failure of debtors to 
pay when due. 
The Company is potentially subject to losses on loans previously sold due to loan foreclosures. The Company has 
obligations to either repurchase the outstanding principal balance of a loan or make the purchaser whole for the economic 
benefits of a loan if it is determined that the loan sold violated representations or warranties made by the Company and/or the 
borrower at the time of the sale, which the Company refers to as mortgage loan putback expenses. Such representations and 
warranties typically include those made regarding loans that had missing or insufficient file documentation and/or loans 
obtained through fraud by borrowers or other third parties. Putback claims may be made until the loan is paid in full. When a 
putback claim is received, the Company evaluates the claim and takes appropriate actions based on the nature of the claim. 
The Company is required by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
to provide a response to putback claims within 60 days of the date of receipt.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the reserve for mortgage loan putback expenses totaled $103,000 and $127,000, 
respectively. There is inherent uncertainty in reasonably estimating the requirement for reserves against future mortgage loan 
putback expenses. Future putback expenses depend on many subjective factors, including the review procedures of the 
purchasers and the potential refinance activity on loans sold with servicing released and the subsequent consequences under 
the representations and warranties.
Note 10 — Deposits
Deposit balances are summarized as follows:
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Noninterest-bearing demand
$ 
1,900,651 
$ 
1,919,638 
Money market
 
2,930,710 
 
2,772,807 
Interest bearing demand
 
2,060,463 
 
1,875,864 
Time deposits
 
941,000 
 
967,901 
Brokered deposits(1)
 
80,226 
 
444,989 
Savings
 
310,070 
 
269,926 
Total
$ 
8,223,120 
$ 
8,251,125 
_____________________
(1)
At December 31, 2024, brokered deposits included brokered time deposits and brokered interest-bearing demand of $79.99 million and $236,000, 
respectively. At December 31, 2023, brokered deposits included brokered time deposits of $445.0 million.
Municipal deposits totaled $960.6 million and $881.5 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Included in time and brokered time deposits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, are $525.1 million and $894.4 million, 
respectively, of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
121

Maturities of time deposits, at December 31, 2024, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2025
$ 
973,474 
2026
 
28,838 
2027
 
9,908 
2028
 
3,349 
2029
 
5,285 
Thereafter
 
136 
Total
$ 
1,020,990 
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, overdrawn deposits of $2.2 million and $934,000, respectively, were reclassified 
as unsecured loans.
Note 11 — Borrowings
Borrowed funds are summarized as follows:
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Short-term FHLB advances
$ 
— 
$ 
70,000 
Long-term FHLB advances
 
6,198 
 
6,474 
Overnight repurchase agreements with depositors
 
6,262 
 
7,124 
Total FHLB advances and other borrowings
$ 
12,460 
$ 
83,598 
Subordinated indebtedness, net
$ 
159,943 
$ 
194,279 
Additional details of certain FHLB advances are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Interest Rate
Maturity Date
At December 31, 2023:
Short-term FHLB advance, fixed rate
$ 
70,000 
 5.68 %
1/5/2024
Security for all indebtedness and outstanding commitments to the FHLB consists of a blanket floating lien on all of 
the Company’s first mortgage loans, commercial real estate and other real estate loans, as well as the Company’s investment 
in capital stock of the FHLB and deposit accounts at the FHLB. The net amounts available under the blanket floating lien at 
December 31, 2024 and 2023, were $2.15 billion and $2.01 billion, respectively.
Long-Term Borrowings
Interest rates for FHLB long-term advances outstanding at December 31, 2024 and 2023, ranged from 1.99% to 
4.57%. These advances are all fixed rate and are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
122

Scheduled maturities of long-term advances from the FHLB at December 31, 2024, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2025
$ 
— 
2026
 
447 
2027
 
1,227 
2028
 
— 
2029
 
1,361 
Thereafter 
 
3,163 
Total
$ 
6,198 
Short-Term Borrowings
The Company’s repurchase agreements include the sale and repurchase of investment securities and mature on a 
daily basis. The total overnight repurchase agreements with depositors carried a daily average interest rate of 2.62% for the 
year ended December 31, 2024, and 2.21% for the year ended December 31, 2023.
The Company had unsecured lines of credit for the purchase of federal funds in the amount of $145.0 million at 
December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Company also had a $75.0 million secured repurchase line of credit at December 31, 2024 
and 2023. There were no amounts outstanding on these lines at either date. It is customary for the financial institutions 
granting the unsecured lines of credit to require a minimum amount of cash be held on deposit at that institution. Amounts 
required to be held on deposit are typically $250,000 or less, and the Company has complied with all compensating balance 
requirements to allow utilization of these lines of credit.
Additionally, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had the availability to borrow $1.33 billion and 
$1.42 billion, respectively, from the discount window at the FRBD, with $1.57 billion and $1.69 billion in commercial and 
industrial loans pledged as collateral, respectively. There were no borrowings against this line at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Holding Company Line of Credit
The Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), along with certain ancillary instruments, 
with NexBank SSB (“Lender”) pursuant to which the Lender could make one or more revolving credit loans of up to $50.0 
million to the Company, which can be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. On October 29, 2021, the 
Company entered into a second amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, the 
loan was not permitted to exceed an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million, consisting of the $50.0 million existing 
loan amount and any one or more potential incremental revolving loan commitments that the Lender could make in its sole 
discretion, up to an aggregate principal of $50.0 million, upon the request of the Company. Any principal amounts borrowed 
under the Loan Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to the applicable Term SOFR for the then-current SOFR 
Interest Period plus 3.35% (as such terms are defined in the Loan Agreement). The Company was entitled to extend the 
maturity date to a date that is three hundred and sixty-four (364) days after the then-effective maturity date, no more than two 
times upon (i) delivery of a written request therefor to Lender at least thirty (30) days, but no more than (60) days, prior to the 
maturity date then in effect; and (ii) receipt by the Lender of a certificate of the Company dated the date of such request. 
Consistent with the terms of the agreement, the Company extended the maturity twice in prior years. The Loan Agreement 
was terminated upon its October 27, 2024, expiration date. The Company had no balance outstanding on this revolving credit 
loan under the Loan Agreement at December 31, 2023.
Subordinated Indebtedness
At December 31, 2023, the Company had $34.7 million in subordinated promissory notes that were assumed in the 
merger with BTH (“BTH Notes”) with origination dates ranging from June 2015 to June 2021. After the five-year 
anniversary of issuance, the Company had the right to redeem the BTH Notes, in part or in full, at the Company’s discretion 
and, if applicable, subject to receipt of any required regulatory approvals. Primarily due to the declining Tier 2 capital 
treatment of the BTH Notes, the Company elected to redeem majority of the BTH Notes during the year ended December 31, 
2024.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
123

In February 2020, Origin Bank completed an offering of $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25% 
fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2030 (the “4.25% Notes”) to certain investors in a transaction exempt from 
registration under Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 4.25% Notes bore interest at a fixed annual 
rate of 4.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, to but excluding February 15, 2025. From and including February 15, 2025, 
to but excluding the maturity date or early redemption date, the interest rate would equal the three-month LIBOR rate plus 
282 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. On June 30, 2023, in conjunction with the customary fallback provision upon 
the discontinuation of LIBOR, the rate for the floating rate periods from and including February 15, 2025, on these notes 
transitioned to the three-month term SOFR plus 308 basis points. Origin Bank elected to redeem the 4.25% Notes on  
February 15, 2025, as permitted under the terms of the 4.25% Notes. 
In October 2020, the Company completed of an offering of $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.50% 
fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due 2030 (the “4.50% Notes”). The 4.50% Notes bear a fixed interest rate of 4.50% 
payable semi-annually in arrears, to but excluding November 1, 2025. From and including November 1, 2025, to but 
excluding the maturity date or earlier redemption date, the 4.50% Notes bear a floating interest rate expected to equal the 
three-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 432 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. The Company may 
redeem the 4.50% Notes at any time upon certain specified events or in whole or in part on or after November 1, 2025. The 
4.50% Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes for the Company and a portion was transferred to Origin 
Bank, which qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes for the Bank. During the years ended December 31, 
2024 and 2023, and with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Company repurchased 
$1.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, of the 4.50% notes. 
The following table is a summary of the terms of the junior subordinated debentures at December 31, 2024:
(Dollars in thousands)
Issuance Trust
Issuance Date
Maturity 
Date
Amount 
Outstanding
Rate Type
Current Rate
Maximum 
Rate
CTB Statutory Trust I
07/2001
07/2031
$ 
6,702 
Variable (1)
 8.15 %
 16.00 %
First Louisiana Statutory Trust I
09/2006
12/2036
 
4,124 
Variable (2)
 6.42 
 16.00 
BT Holdings Trust I
05/2007
09/2037
 
7,217 
Variable (3)
 6.35 
N/A
Par amount 
$ 
18,043 
Unamortized original issue discount
 
(973) 
Unamortized purchase accounting discount
 
(622) 
Total junior subordinated debt at December 31, 2024
$ 
16,448 
____________________________
(1)
The trust preferred securities reprice quarterly based on the three-month average SOFR plus 3.30%, plus 0.26161% SOFR with the last reprice date on 
October 29, 2024.
(2)
The trust preferred securities reprice quarterly based on the three-month CME Term SOFR plus 1.80%, plus 0.26161% SOFR spread adjustment, with 
the last reprice date on December 12, 2024.
(3)
The trust preferred securities reprice quarterly based on the three-month CME Term SOFR plus 1.64%, plus 0.26161% SOFR spread adjustment, with 
the last reprice date on December 4, 2024. 
The balance of the subordinated indebtedness carried on the consolidated balance sheets varies from the outstanding 
amounts due to the remaining original issue and purchase discount of which was established at the time of issuance or 
purchase and is being amortized over the remaining life of the securities using the interest method.
Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to differences in the amount, 
timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments, as well as 
to manage changes in fair values of some assets which are marked at fair value through the consolidated statement of income 
on a recurring basis.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
124

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company was a party to interest rate swap agreements under which the Company received interest at a variable 
rate and paid interest at a fixed rate. The derivative instruments represented by these swap agreements were designated as 
cash flow hedges of the Company’s forecasted variable cash flows under variable-rate term borrowing agreements. During 
the terms of the swap agreements, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments were 
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the periods that the 
hedged forecasted variable-rate interest payments affected earnings. During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company 
terminated these swap agreements locking in an after-tax gain of $537,000 in other comprehensive income. The gain will be 
accreted from other comprehensive income to earnings over the remaining term of the swap agreements (March 2027 and 
April 2027). Additionally, during the duration of these swap agreements, there was no ineffective portion of the change in fair 
value of the derivatives recognized directly in earnings. 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges
Customer interest rate derivative program
The Company offers certain derivatives products, primarily interest rate swaps, directly to qualified commercial 
banking customers to facilitate their risk management strategies. In most instances, the Company acts only as an 
intermediary, simultaneously entering into offsetting agreements with unrelated financial institutions, thereby mitigating its 
net risk exposure resulting from such transactions without significantly impacting its results of operations. Because the 
interest rate derivatives associated with this program do not meet hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of 
both the customer derivatives and any offsetting derivatives are recognized directly in earnings as a component of noninterest 
income.
From time to time, the Company shares in credit risk on interest rate swap arrangements, by entering into risk 
participation agreements with syndication partners. These are accounted for at fair value and disclosed as risk participation 
derivatives.
Mortgage banking derivatives
As part of its mortgage banking and related risk management activities, the Company enters into interest rate lock 
commitment agreements (“IRLCs”) on prospective residential mortgage loans. These IRLCs are derivative financial 
instruments and the fair value of these IRLCs are included in other assets. Prior to January 1, 2024, the Company also 
economically hedged the value of the MSR asset by entering into a series of commitments to purchase mortgage-backed 
securities in the future and U.S. Treasury Notes.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
125

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following tables disclose the fair value of derivative instruments in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets 
at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, as well as the effect of these derivative instruments on the Company’s 
consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Derivative instruments and their related 
gains and losses are reported in other operating activities, net in the statements of cash flows.
(Dollars in thousands)
Notional Amounts(1)
Fair Values
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
December 31, 
2024
December 31, 
2023
December 31, 
2024
December 31, 
2023
Interest rate swaps included in other assets
$ 
— 
$ 
10,500 
$ 
— 
$ 
786 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps included in other assets
$ 
365,042 
$ 
363,498 
$ 
15,264 
$ 
18,567 
Interest rate swaps included in other liabilities
 
358,527 
 
356,683 
 
(14,959)  
(18,298) 
Risk participation agreements included in other 
liabilities
 
32,494 
 
20,000 
 
— 
 
(2) 
Forward commitments to purchase forward-settling 
mortgage-backed securities included in other assets
 
— 
 
9,000 
 
— 
 
91 
Forward commitments to purchase treasury notes in 
other assets
 
— 
 
22,500 
 
— 
 
822 
Interest rate-lock commitments on residential 
mortgage loans included in other assets
 
11,007 
 
8,471 
 
331 
 
221 
$ 
767,070 
$ 
780,152 
$ 
636 
$ 
1,401 
____________________________
(1)
Notional or contractual amounts, which represent the extent of involvement in the derivatives market, are used to determine the contractual cash flows 
required in accordance with the terms of the agreement. These amounts are typically not exchanged, significantly exceed amounts subject to credit or 
market risk and are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.
The weighted-average rates for interest rate swaps were as follows:
Weighted-Average Interest Rate
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Interest rate swaps:
Paid
Received
Paid
Received
Cash flow hedges
 4.24 %
 8.31 %
 4.24 %
 8.35 %
Non-hedging interest rate swaps - financial institution counterparties
 5.04 
 7.67 
 4.88 
 7.82 
Non-hedging interest rate swaps - customer counterparties
 7.67 
 5.04 
 7.82 
 4.88 
Gains and losses recognized on derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
2024
2023
2022
Amount of (loss) gain recognized in mortgage banking revenue (1)
$ 
41 $ 
(573) $ 
(2,813) 
Amount of (loss) gain recognized in other non-interest income
 
38  
(41)  
655 
____________________________
(1)
Gains and losses on these instruments are largely offset by market fluctuations in the MSR asset. The Company sold substantially all of its MSR asset 
recognizing a gain on the sale of $410,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. See Note 9 — Mortgage Banking for more information on 
components of mortgage banking revenue. 
Some interest rate swaps included in other assets were subject to a master netting arrangement with the counterparty 
in all periods presented and could be offset against some amounts included in interest rate swaps included in other liabilities. 
The Company has chosen not to net these exposures in the consolidated balance sheets, and any impact of netting these 
amounts would not be significant.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
126

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had cash collateral on deposit with swap counterparties totaling 
$670,000 and $865,000, respectively. These amounts are included in interest-bearing deposits in banks in the consolidated 
balance sheets and are considered restricted cash until such time as the underlying swaps are settled. 
Note 13 — Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans 
The Company has granted, and currently has outstanding, stock and incentive compensation awards subject to the 
provisions of the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). Additionally, the Company’s stockholders 
approved the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) at the April 24, 2024, Annual Meeting.
The 2012 Plan and the Omnibus Plan (collectively, the “Incentive Plans”) are designed to provide flexibility to the 
Company regarding its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of key officers, employees and directors. The 
Incentive Plans allow the Company to make grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation 
rights, restricted stock awards (“RSA”), restricted stock units (“RSU”), dividend equivalent rights, performance stock units 
(“PSU”) or any combination thereof. A maximum of 1,375,000 shares were originally reserved for issuance under the 
Incentive Plans. The Omnibus Plan, approved in April 2024, allows for the issuance of 675,000 shares, and no future awards 
may be granted under the 2012 Plan after adoption of the Omnibus Plan. At December 31, 2024, the maximum number of 
shares of the Company’s common stock available for grant under the Omnibus Plan was 499,998.
Additionally, the Company’s stockholders previously approved an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) which 
qualified as an ESPP under IRS guidelines. The ESPP provides for the purchase of up to an aggregate 1,000,000 shares of the 
Company’s common stock by employees. Under the ESPP, employees of the Company, who elect to participate, have the 
right to purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s common stock at a 15% discount from the lower of the market 
value of the common stock at the beginning or the end of each one year offering period, beginning on June 1st. The ESPP 
benefit is treated as compensation to the employee, and the compensation expense will be recognized over the service period 
based on the grant date fair value of the rights determined at the beginning of the purchase period, adjusted for forfeitures and 
certain modifications. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. At December 31, 2024, there was $208,336 of total 
unrecognized compensation cost related to estimated ESPP shares for the June 1, 2024 - May 31, 2025 ESPP offering period. 
These costs are expected to be recognized over a period of 0.4 years.
The table below includes the weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the ESPP 
rights for the periods indicated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model:
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Expected term (in years)
1.00
1.00
1.00
Dividend yield
$ 
2.02 
$ 
1.88 
$ 
1.41 
Risk-free interest rate
 4.94 %
 3.90 %
 1.24 %
Expected volatility
 30.69 
 31.63 
 37.90 
The ESPP shares purchased are as follows for the dates indicated:
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
ESPP shares purchased
 
56,658  
46,213 
 
26,089 
Shares available for issuance under the ESPP
 
871,040  
927,698 
 
973,911 
The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) has approved, and the Company has granted PSUs to select officers 
and employees under the Incentive Plans. Each PSU represents a right for the participant to receive shares of Company 
common stock or cash equal to the fair market value of such stock, as determined by the Committee. The number of PSUs to 
which the participant may be entitled will vary from 0% to 150% of the target number of PSUs, based on the Company’s 
achievement of specified performance criteria during the performance period compared to performance benchmarks adopted 
by the Committee and, further, the participant’s continuous service with the Company through the third anniversary of the 
date of the grant. Each performance period commences on January 1 and ends three years later on December 31 
(“Performance Period”).
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
127

 On December 7, 2022, the Committee and the independent members of the Board also approved a special, one-time 
stock award to Drake Mills, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (the “One-Time Award”), having an 
approximate value of $10,000,000, was comprised of 129,736 restricted stock units (“CEO RSUs”) and 129,735 market-
based performance stock units (“CEO PSUs”), and was effective as of December 13, 2022, (the “Grant Date”). In exchange 
for the One-Time Award, Mr. Mills agreed to a 2-year non-competition covenant, in addition to the standard non-solicitation 
of customers and employees covenant included in the Company’s form of award agreement. Pursuant to the One-Time 
Award, the CEO RSUs shall vest in five approximately equal installments on each of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh 
anniversaries of the Grant Date, subject to Mr. Mills’ continued employment with the Company on each respective vesting 
date, or upon the earlier occurrence of Mr. Mills’ death, disability, termination of employment without cause or resignation 
for good reason. The CEO PSUs shall be eligible to vest based on achievement of five pre-established stock price hurdles 
(each, a “Stock Price Hurdle”) during a seven-year performance period (the “CEO Performance Period”). Achievement of 
each Stock Price Hurdle requires substantial and sustained growth in the Company’s stock price, with each Stock Price 
Hurdle representing a twenty percent (20%) price appreciation over the 20-day average closing price of the Company’s 
common stock as of the Grant Date (such that 100% appreciation is required for 100% of the CEO PSUs to vest). Each Stock 
Price Hurdle must be maintained for twenty consecutive days during the CEO Performance Period. Each of the five tranches 
of CEO PSUs will vest on the later of the date that the applicable Stock Price Hurdle is achieved (“Achieved PSUs”) or the 
third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh anniversaries of the Grant Date, respectively, subject to Mr. Mills’ continued 
employment with the Company on each respective vesting date, or upon the earlier occurrence of Mr. Mills’ death or 
disability. If Mr. Mills’ employment is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, then any Achieved PSUs will 
become fully vested and unearned CEO PSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on achievement of the Stock 
Price Hurdle during the CEO Performance Period. The One-Time Award was granted pursuant to, and subject to the terms 
and conditions of, the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and the Company’s form of RSU agreement and PSU 
agreement, respectively. 
Compensation expense for the CEO PSUs will be recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair 
value of the award at the grant date determined by using a Monte Carlo simulation model with the following inputs:
Simulation Inputs
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Grant date
December 13, 2022
Performance period
seven years
Stock price
$ 
36.87 
Expected volatility (1)
 33.0 %
Risk-free rate (2)
 3.5 
__________________________
(1)
The expected volatility was determined based on the historical volatilities of the Company and the specified peer group.
(2)
The risk-free interest rate for the performance period was derived from the seven-year continuous U.S. Treasury Yield constant maturity curve on the 
valuation date.
Restricted Stock and Performance Stock Grants
The Company’s RSAs and RSUs are time-vested awards and are granted to the Company’s Board of Directors, 
executives and senior management team. The service period in which time-vested awards are earned ranges from one to 
seven years. Time-vested awards are valued utilizing the fair value of the Company’s stock at the grant date. These awards 
are recognized on the straight-line method over the requisite service period, with forfeitures recognized as they occur. 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
128

The Company’s PSU awards, excluding the CEO PSUs, are three-year cliff-vested awards, with each unit divided 
into two categories (“ROAA Unit Group” and “ROAE Unit Group”), composed of an equivalent number of initial PSUs 
granted. The PSU share amounts do not reflect potential increases or decreases resulting from the interim performance results 
until the final performance results are determined at the end of the three-year period. The ROAA Unit Group is based upon 
the Company’s Performance Period Return on Average Assets performance, as defined in the award agreement, and the 
ROAE Unit Group is based upon the Company’s Performance Period Return on Average Equity performance, as defined in 
the award agreement. The PSUs are initially valued utilizing the fair value of the Company’s stock at the grant date, assuming 
100% of the target number of units are achieved. Subsequent valuation of the PSUs is determined using the ratio of the actual 
Company’s Performance Period ROAA or ROAE to the Company’s targeted Performance Period ROAA or ROAE. The 
determination of whether and to what extent the performance criteria has been satisfied during the applicable Performance 
Period shall be made by the Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, including disregarding certain 
nonrecurring, unusual or infrequent items in the ROAA or ROAE calculation as described further in the PSU award 
agreement. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
The following table summarizes the Company’s award activity:
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
Shares
Weighted 
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted 
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted 
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value
Nonvested RSAs, January 1,
 
17,629 
$ 
29.33  
27,391 $ 
35.37  
48,048 $ 
35.27 
Granted RSAs
 
20,415 
 
33.06  
16,788  
28.61  
12,840  
37.39 
Vested RSAs
 
(17,629)  
29.33  
(26,550)  
35.11  
(33,497)  
36.00 
Nonvested RSAs, December 31,
 
20,415 
 
33.06  
17,629  
29.33  
27,391  
35.37 
Nonvested RSUs, January 1,
 
318,168 
$ 
37.69  
270,390 $ 
39.63  
73,977 $ 
40.64 
Granted RSUs
 
119,149 
 
32.01  
116,098  
35.65  
222,282  
39.43 
Vested RSUs
 
(83,889)  
38.93  
(55,614)  
41.98  
(24,028)  
40.56 
Forfeited RSUs
 
(1,426)  
42.15  
(12,706)  
41.59  
(1,841)  
43.48 
Nonvested RSUs, December 31,
 
352,002 
 
35.45  
318,168  
37.69  
270,390  
39.63 
Nonvested PSUs, January 1,
 
197,842 
$ 
28.33  
157,367 $ 
29.06  
— $ 
— 
Granted PSUs
 
67,355 
 
33.03  
43,591  
31.77  
157,367  
29.06 
Forfeited PSUs
 
— 
 
—  
(3,116)  
31.77  
—  
— 
Nonvested PSUs, December 31, 
 
265,197 
 
32.07  
197,842  
28.33  
157,367  
29.06 
At December 31, 2024, there was $236,000, $9.5 million and $3.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost 
related to nonvested RSA shares, RSU shares and PSU shares under the Incentive Plans, respectively. Those costs are 
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.3, 3.0 and 1.2 years for RSA, RSU and PSU shares, 
respectively.
Share-based compensation cost charged to income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, is 
presented below. There was no stock option expense for any of the periods shown.
Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
RSA & RSU
$ 
4,631 
$ 
4,321 
$ 
2,845 
PSU
 
2,043 
 
534 
 
288 
ESPP
 
492 
 
426 
 
316 
Total stock compensation expense
$ 
7,166 
$ 
5,281 
$ 
3,449 
Related tax benefits recognized in net income
$ 
1,505 
$ 
1,109 
$ 
724 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
129

Stock Option Grants
The Company has previously issued common stock options to select officers and employees primarily through 
individual agreements. The exercise price of each option varies by agreement and is based on the fair value of the stock at the 
date of the grant. No outstanding stock option has a term that exceeds twenty years, and all of the outstanding options are 
fully vested. The Company recognized compensation cost for stock option grants over the required service period based upon 
the grant date fair value, which is established using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes valuation model 
uses assumptions of risk-free interest rate, expected term of stock options, expected stock price volatility and expected 
dividends. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
In conjunction with the BTH merger, the Company assumed the BTH 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and converted all 
outstanding options to purchase BTH common stock into options to purchase an aggregate of 611,676 shares of the 
Company’s common stock. Under the terms of applicable change in control provisions within the BTH 2012 Equity Incentive 
Plan and BTH Notice Of Stock Option Award, all BTH stock options fully vested immediately prior to the closing of the 
merger that occurred on August 1, 2022. BTH converted options have no expiration dates past August 16, 2031, and no 
further grants will be made under the BTH 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
The table below summarizes the Company’s option activity:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Number of 
Shares
Weighted 
Average 
Exercise Price
Weighted 
Average 
Remaining 
Contractual 
Term (in years)
Aggregate 
Intrinsic Value
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Outstanding at January 1, 2024
 
353,473 
$ 
31.49 
4.46
$ 
1,670 
Exercised
 
(73,188)  
26.50 
 
— 
 
559 
Expired and forfeited
 
(54,451)  
35.06 
 
— 
 
— 
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2024
 
225,834 
 
32.24 
3.72
 
614 
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Outstanding at January 1, 2023
 
504,437 
$ 
29.46 
5.13
$ 
3,736 
Exercised
 
(135,746)  
23.61 
 
— 
 
1,533 
Expired and forfeited
 
(15,218)  
34.48 
 
— 
 
— 
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2023
 
353,473 
 
31.49 
4.46
 
1,670 
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Outstanding at January 1, 2022
 
39,200 
$ 
10.73 
2.28
$ 
1,262 
BTH options converted to OBK options
 
611,676 
 
28.62 
 
— 
 
8,838 
Exercised
 
(144,785)  
20.80 
 
— 
 
2,992 
Expired and forfeited
 
(1,654)  
34.44 
 
— 
 
— 
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2022
 
504,437 
 
29.46 
5.13
 
3,736 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
130

Note 14 — Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
The Company maintains the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that is a 
defined contribution benefit plan, which allows contributions under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The 
Retirement Plan covers substantially all employees who meet certain other requirements and employment classification 
criteria. Under the provisions of the Retirement Plan, the Company may make discretionary matching contributions on a 
percentage, not to exceed 6% of a participant’s elective deferrals. Any percentage(s) determined by the Company shall apply 
to all eligible persons for the entire plan year. Historically, the Company has matched 50% of the first 6% of eligible 
compensation deferred by a participant. Eligible compensation includes salaries, wages, overtime and bonuses, and excludes 
expense reimbursements and fringe benefits. In addition, the Company may make additional discretionary contributions out 
of current or accumulated net profit. Matching contributions are invested as directed by the participant. The total of the 
Company’s contributions may not exceed limitations set forth in the Retirement Plan document or the maximum deductible 
under the Internal Revenue Code.
Although it has not expressed any intention to do so, the Company has the right to terminate the Retirement Plan at 
any time. The total expense related to the Retirement Plan, including optional contributions, was $2.9 million, $2.7 million 
and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 
Other Benefit Plans
The Company has entered into individual Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERP”) or Executive 
Supplemental Income Agreements (“ESIA”) with several of its executive officers. Eligibility to participate in a SERP or 
ESIA is limited to senior officers and determined by the Board. The SERPs and ESIA are unfunded and designed to be a 
nonqualified deferred compensation retirement plan in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. 
Deferred compensation has been recorded for these plans as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities in the 
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The deferred compensation liability was $10.8 million at both December 31, 
2024 and 2023. Typically, payments to participants reduce the accrual and any actuarial adjustments are netted with the 
expense. The expense recorded for the deferred compensation plan totaled $630,000, $452,000 and $1.1 million for the years 
ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 
On December 7, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Origin Bank Nonqualified Deferred 
Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), pursuant to which certain employees, including the Company’s named executive officers, 
may elect to participate. Pursuant to the DCP, which became effective January 1, 2023, participants may make deferral 
elections with respect to their base salary, bonus or stock units. The accounting treatment for the DCP differs based upon the 
type of compensation deferred and therefore, plan assets were bifurcated based upon the deferral of salary/bonus (cash 
compensation) or stock unit. Effective January 1, 2025, the Origin Bank Long-Term Equity Deferred Compensation Plan 
(“LTE-DCP”) portion of the DCP, which allowed the deferral of stock units, was suspended due to administrative 
inefficiencies and its limited benefits for participants. While existing grants with deferred elections for the 2024 performance 
year will remain in place, no new deferrals will be made under this program going forward. The cash compensation deferral 
portion of the DCP is accounted for under the scope of Federal Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards 
Codification 710-10-15-8 - Deferred Compensation - Rabbi Trust and satisfies the Internal Revenue Service guidelines for a 
Rabbi Trust. The Company may make discretionary contributions to the DCP, which contributions will be subject to a vesting 
schedule. Unless otherwise specified by the Company, such Company contributions will have a five-year ratable vesting 
schedule, subject to acceleration of vesting in the case of a change in control or the participant’s death, disability or 
retirement. Participants may make individual investment elections that will determine the rate of return on their cash deferral 
amounts under the DCP. Cash deferrals are only deemed to be invested in the investment options selected. The DCP does not 
provide any above-market returns or preferential earnings to participants, and, with the exception of Company contributions, 
the deferrals and their earnings are always 100% vested. Participants may elect, at the time they make their deferral elections, 
to receive in-service distributions or separation from service distributions. Distributions can be paid either as a lump sum 
payment or in substantially equal annual installments, over a period of up to five years for in-service distributions, or over a 
period of up to ten years for separation from service distributions. The DCP deferred liability was 512000 at December 31, 
2024.  
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
131

The Company elected the fair value option for Rabbi Trust portion of the DCP, and therefore, the investment loss 
(gain) also represents a decrease (increase) in the future payout to participants and is recorded as compensation (benefit) 
expense in our consolidated statements of income. Compensation (benefit) expense associated with the Rabbi Trust 
obligations is offset by loss (gain) from related securities. The net effect of investment income or loss and related 
compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income, or cash balances. The LTE-
DCP portion of the DCP had an immaterial expense amount recorded for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 
2022. 
Note 15 — Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Federal income taxes:
2024
2023
2022
Current
$ 
19,920 
$ 
(7,181) $ 
1,378 
Deferred
 
(1,425)  
27,458 
 
18,634 
State income taxes:
Current
 
2,314 
 
1,590 
 
40 
Deferred
 
(42)  
256 
 
(325) 
Income tax expense
$ 
20,767 
$ 
22,123 
$ 
19,727 
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense is below:
Years Ended December 31,
2024
2023
2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
Income taxes computed at statutory rate
$ 
20,424 
 21.00 % $ 
22,244 
 21.00 % $ 
22,563 
 21.00 %
Tax exempt revenue, net of nondeductible interest
 
(772) 
 (0.79) 
 
(1,072) 
 (1.01) 
 
(1,510) 
 (1.41) 
Low-income housing tax credits, net of amortization
 
(539) 
 (0.55) 
 
(758) 
 (0.72) 
 
(832) 
 (0.77) 
Other tax credits, net of add-backs
 
(1,063) 
 (1.09) 
 
(1,218) 
 (1.15) 
 
(1,218) 
 (1.13) 
Bank-owned life insurance income
 
(196) 
 (0.20) 
 
(182) 
 (0.17) 
 
(145) 
 (0.13) 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
 
1,791 
 1.84 
 
1,498 
 1.41 
 
(201) 
 (0.19) 
Stock-based compensation
 
525 
 0.54 
 
632 
 0.60 
 
17 
 0.02 
Nondeductible expense
 
834 
 0.86 
 
814 
 0.77 
 
996 
 0.93 
Other
 
(237) 
 (0.26) 
 
165 
 0.16 
 
57 
 0.04 
Total income tax expense
$ 
20,767 
 21.35 % $ 
22,123 
 20.89 % $ 
19,727 
 18.36 %
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
132

Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
Deferred tax assets:
2024
2023
Credit loss allowances
$ 
20,458 
$ 
22,019 
Deferred compensation and share-based compensation
 
8,244 
 
7,442 
Net operating loss carryforwards
 
1,699 
 
1,333 
Other
 
1 
 
5 
Self-funded insurance
 
119 
 
— 
Litigation reserve
 
854 
 
— 
Investments in limited partnerships
 
1,307 
 
1,789 
Other real estate owned 
 
137 
 
24 
Lease obligations
 
48 
 
48 
Premium/discount on acquisitions
 
187 
 
187 
Deferred rent obligations
 
819 
 
427 
Gross deferred tax assets
 
33,873 
 
33,274 
Valuation allowance
 
(1,587)  
(1,193) 
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
$ 
32,286 
$ 
32,081 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Basis difference in premises and equipment
$ 
6,864 
$ 
4,586 
Intangible assets
 
5,597 
 
6,858 
Mortgage servicing rights
 
— 
 
3,378 
Deferred Income
 
3,302 
 
2,181 
Other
 
339 
 
361 
Gross deferred tax liabilities
 
16,102 
 
17,364 
Net deferred tax asset
$ 
16,184 
$ 
14,717 
At December 31, 2024, the Company had $2.1 million of Federal gross net operating net loss carryforwards and 
$28.5 million in gross state net operating losses carryforwards. Of these net loss carryforwards, $2.1 million in Federal gross 
net operating loss carryforwards acquired in previous business combinations are expiring between 2025 and 2028, and 97.9% 
of the $28.5 million in state net operating losses can be carried forward indefinitely with the remaining carryforwards 
expiring between 2040 and 2042. Due to limitations on the amounts of these losses that can be recognized annually, the 
Company has determined that it is more likely than not that some of these net operating loss carryforwards will expire unused 
and has established a $1.6 million valuation allowance related to these carryforwards.
The Company files a consolidated income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. With few 
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in these taxing jurisdictions for 
the years before 2021.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
133

Note 16 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (“AOCI”) includes the after-tax change in unrealized gains and 
losses on AFS securities and cash flow hedging activities.
(Dollars in thousands)
Unrealized 
(Loss) Gain on 
AFS Securities
Unrealized Gain 
(Loss) on Cash 
Flow Hedges
Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
(Loss) Income
Balance at January 1, 2022
$ 
5,809 
$ 
(80) $ 
5,729 
Net change
 
(166,509)  
905 
 
(165,604) 
Balance at December 31, 2022
 
(160,700)  
825 
 
(159,875) 
Net change
 
39,054 
 
(202)  
38,852 
Balance at December 31, 2023
 
(121,646)  
623 
 
(121,023) 
Net change
 
15,111 
 
(117)  
14,994 
Balance at December 31, 2024
$ 
(106,535) $ 
506 
$ 
(106,029) 
Note 17 — Capital and Regulatory Matters 
The Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements 
administered by federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain 
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect 
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for 
prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures 
of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital 
amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and 
other factors.
The Company is subject to the Basel III regulatory capital framework (“Basel III Capital Rules”), which includes a 
2.5% capital conservation buffer. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic 
stress and requires increased capital levels for the purpose of capital distributions and other payments. Failure to meet the full 
amount of the buffer will result in restrictions on the Company’s ability to make capital distributions, which include dividend 
payments, stock repurchases and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to 
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total, common equity Tier 1 and Tier 1 capital to risk-
weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average total consolidated assets (as defined). Management 
believes, at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy 
requirements to which they are subject, including the capital buffer requirement.
At December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded those levels necessary to be 
categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well 
capitalized,” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, common equity Tier 1 risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 
1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. A final rule adopted by the federal banking agencies in February 2019 
provides banking organizations with the option to phase in, over a three-year period, the adverse day-one regulatory capital 
effects of the adoption of CECL. In addition, on March 27, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule 
that gives banking organizations that were required to implement CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two 
years CECL’s adverse effects on regulatory capital. The Bank elected to adopt CECL in the first quarter of 2020 and 
exercised the option to delay the estimated impact of the adoption of CECL on the Company’s regulatory capital for two 
years (from January 2020 through December 31, 2021). The two-year delay is followed by a three-year transition period of 
CECL’s initial impact on the Company’s regulatory capital (from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024). The amount 
representing the CECL impact to the Company’s regulatory capital that will be ratably transitioning back into regulatory 
capital over the transition period was zero and $2.5 million at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively. 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
134

The actual capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the Bank at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, 
are presented in the following table:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
Actual
Minimum Capital 
Required - Basel III
To be Well Capitalized 
Under Prompt 
Corrective Action 
Provisions
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
$ 1,085,860 
 13.32 % $ 570,647 
 7.00 %
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,075,768 
 13.29 
 566,620 
 7.00 
$ 526,147 
 6.50 %
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,101,766 
 13.52 
 692,929 
 8.50 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,075,768 
 13.29 
 688,038 
 8.50 
 647,565 
 8.00 
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,339,735 
 16.44 
 855,670 
 10.50 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,239,644 
 15.31 
 850,353 
 10.50 
 809,860 
 10.00 
Leverage Ratio
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,101,766 
 11.08 
 397,635 
 4.00 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,075,768 
 10.89 
 395,154 
 4.00 
 493,943 
 5.00 
December 31, 2023
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,012,916 
 11.83 
 599,455 
 7.00 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,019,732 
 11.95 
 597,548 
 7.00 
 554,866 
 6.50 
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,028,729 
 12.01 
 727,907 
 8.50 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,019,732 
 11.95 
 725,593 
 8.50 
 682,912 
 8.00 
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,286,604 
 15.02 
 899,184 
 10.50 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,188,000 
 13.92 
 896,320 
 10.50 
 853,638 
 10.00 
Leverage Ratio
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
 1,028,729 
 10.50 
 391,822 
 4.00 
N/A
N/A
Origin Bank
 1,019,732 
 10.45 
 390,246 
 4.00 
 487,807 
 5.00 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company depends on dividends from the Bank to provide funds for the 
payment of dividends to stockholders and to provide for other cash requirements. Banking regulations may limit the amount 
of dividends that may be paid. Approval by regulatory authorities is required if the effect of dividends declared would cause 
the regulatory capital of the Bank to fall below specified minimum levels. Approval is also required if dividends declared and 
paid exceed the Bank’s year-to-date net income combined with the retained net income for the preceding year, which was 
$78.4 million at December 31, 2024.
Stock Repurchases
In July 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the 
Company may, from time to time, purchase up to $50 million of its outstanding common stock. The shares may be 
repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time, depending upon market conditions 
and other factors, and in accordance with applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The stock 
repurchase program is intended to expire in three years but may be terminated or amended by the Board of Directors at any 
time. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to purchase any shares at any time.
There have been no stock repurchases during the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
135

Note 18 — Commitments and Contingencies 
Credit-Related Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into financial instruments, such as commitments to extend 
credit and letters of credit, to meet the financing needs of its customers. Such instruments are not reflected in the 
accompanying consolidated financial statements until they are funded, although they expose the Company to varying degrees 
of credit risk and interest rate risk in much the same way as funded loans.
Commitments to extend credit include revolving commercial credit lines, non-revolving loan commitments issued 
mainly to finance the merger and development or construction of real property or equipment, and credit card and personal 
credit lines. The availability of funds under commercial credit lines and loan commitments generally depends on whether the 
borrower continues to meet credit standards established in the underlying contract and has not violated other contractual 
conditions. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of 
a fee by the borrower. Credit card and personal credit lines are generally subject to cancellation if the borrower’s credit 
quality deteriorates. A number of commercial and personal credit lines are used only partially or, in some cases, not at all 
before they expire, and the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Company.
A substantial majority of the letters of credit are standby agreements that obligate the Company to fulfill a 
customer’s financial commitments to a third party if the customer is unable to perform. The Company issues standby letters 
of credit primarily to provide credit enhancement to its customers’ other commercial or public financing arrangements and to 
help them demonstrate financial capacity to vendors of essential goods and services.
The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the Company’s exposure to credit risk. The Company undertakes 
the same credit evaluation in making loan commitments and assuming conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet 
instruments and may require collateral or other credit support. 
The table below presents the Company’s commitments to extend credit by commitment expiration date for the dates 
indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2024
Less than 
One Year
One-Three 
Years
Three-Five 
Years
Greater than 
Five Years
Total
Commitments to extend credit(1)
$ 
776,568 
$ 
612,149 
$ 
238,791 
$ 
44,095 
$ 
1,671,603 
Standby letters of credit
 
169,983 
 
42,609 
 
21,318 
 
350 
 
234,260 
Total off-balance sheet commitments
$ 
946,551 
$ 
654,758 
$ 
260,109 
$ 
44,445 
$ 
1,905,863 
December 31, 2023
Commitments to extend credit(1)
$ 
955,486 
$ 
990,690 
$ 
349,918 
$ 
58,954 
$ 
2,355,048 
Standby letters of credit
 
103,280 
 
20,458 
 
32,957 
 
— 
 
156,695 
Total off-balance sheet commitments
$ 
1,058,766 
$ 
1,011,148 
$ 
382,875 
$ 
58,954 
$ 
2,511,743 
____________________________
(1)
Includes $773.1 million and $759.4 million of unconditionally cancellable commitments at December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively.
At December 31, 2024, the Company held 37 unfunded letters of credit from the FHLB totaling $709.2 million, with 
expiration dates ranging from January 2, 2025, to September 22, 2027. At December 31, 2023, the Company held 31 
unfunded letters of credit from the FHLB totaling $693.6 million, with expiration dates ranging from January 14, 2024, to 
September 22, 2027.
Management establishes an asset-specific allowance for certain lending-related commitments and computes a 
formula-based allowance for performing consumer and commercial lending-related commitments. These are computed using 
a methodology similar to that used for the commercial loan portfolio, modified for expected maturities and probabilities of 
drawdown. The reserve for lending-related commitments was $3.5 million and $4.7 million at December 31, 2024, and 
December 31, 2023, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated 
balance sheets.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
136

Loss Contingencies
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company discovered certain questioned activity involving a former 
banker in our East Texas market. The activity involved the banker, who has since been terminated, facilitating transactions in 
and among certain customer loans and accounts. The Company has notified its insurance providers of anticipated claims 
resulting from this activity, but there is no consideration in the Company’s financial results of any potential insurance 
recoveries.
Several of the loan relationships impacted by the activity were placed on non-accrual and, as a result, the Company 
recorded a provision for loan credit losses of $4.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, in 
conjunction with the on-going investigation of this matter, the Company recorded a net contingency reserve of $4.3 million 
during the year ended December 31, 2024. Total expenses associated with the questioned activity for the year ended 
December 31, 2024, were $10.5 million inclusive of the provision for loan credit losses and contingency reserve.
The Company continues to work with a third-party forensic accounting team to confirm the Bank’s identification 
and reconciliation of the activity, and also to assist in evaluating any additional impact from the questioned activity. There is 
at least a reasonable possibility that an additional loss may have been incurred in excess of the amount accrued above and that 
a change in the estimate could occur in the near term. As of the date of this report, management has assessed that an estimate 
for this additional loss cannot be made. At this time, we believe that any ultimate loss arising from the situation will not be 
material to our financial position.
From time to time, the Company is also party to various other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of 
business. Currently, management has not identified any other loss contingencies, either individually or in the aggregate, 
which would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Company.
Note 19 — Related Party Transactions
Loans to executive officers, directors, and their affiliates at December 31, 2024 and 2023, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
Balance, beginning of year
$ 
71,129 
$ 
76,226 
Advances
 
17,455 
 
18,036 
Principal repayments
 
(35,665)  
(23,133) 
Balance, end of year
$ 
52,919 
$ 
71,129 
Commitments to extend credit
$ 
4,123 
$ 
13,523 
None of the above loans were considered non-performing or potential problem loans. These loans were made in the 
ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at 
the time for comparable transactions with other unaffiliated persons and do not involve more than normal risk of 
collectability.
Deposits from related parties held by the Company at December 31, 2024 and 2023, amounted to $21.6 million and 
$34.6 million, respectively.
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
137

Note 20 — Condensed Parent Company Only Financial Statements
Financial statements of Origin Bancorp, Inc. (parent company only) are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
Condensed Balance Sheets
2024
2023
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 
47,876 
$ 
87,698 
Investment in affiliates/subsidiaries
 
1,138,466 
 
1,069,967 
Other assets
 
53,001 
 
33,478 
Total assets
$ 
1,239,343 
$ 
1,191,143 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Subordinated indebtedness, net
$ 
90,641 
$ 
125,078 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
3,457 
 
3,160 
Total liabilities
 
94,098 
 
128,238 
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock
 
155,988 
 
154,931 
Additional paid-in capital
 
537,366 
 
528,578 
Retained earnings
 
557,920 
 
500,419 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(106,029)  
(121,023) 
Total stockholders’ equity
 
1,145,245 
 
1,062,905 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$ 
1,239,343 
$ 
1,191,143 
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Income
2024
2023
2022
Income:
Dividends from subsidiaries
$ 
36,250 
$ 
53,150 
$ 
17,500 
Other
 
5,802 
 
10,945 
 
408 
Total income
 
42,052 
 
64,095 
 
17,908 
Expenses:
Interest expense
 
4,670 
 
7,515 
 
5,612 
Salaries and employee benefits
 
6,125 
 
370 
 
220 
Other
 
1,835 
 
1,708 
 
4,915 
Total expenses
 
12,630 
 
9,593 
 
10,747 
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of 
subsidiaries
 
29,422 
 
54,502 
 
7,161 
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
1,436 
 
(943)  
3,359 
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
 
30,858 
 
53,559 
 
10,520 
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
 
45,634 
 
30,241 
 
77,195 
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 
$ 
87,715 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
138

(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
2024
2023
2022
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$ 
76,492 
$ 
83,800 
$ 
87,715 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating 
activities:
Deferred income taxes
 
1,229 
 
4,451 
 
(2,254) 
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries
 
(45,634)  
(30,241)  
(77,195) 
Amortization of subordinated indebtedness discount including 
purchase accounting adjustment
 
224 
 
220 
 
181 
Gain on equity securities without a readily determinable fair value
 
(5,188)  
(10,096)  
— 
Gain on repurchase of subordinated debentures
 
(81)  
(471)  
— 
Other, net
 
(2,039)  
(4,540)  
4,805 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
25,003 
 
43,123 
 
13,252 
Cash flows from investing activities:
BTH acquisition
 
— 
 
— 
 
44,265 
Purchases of non-marketable equity securities held in other financial 
institutions
 
(12,373)  
— 
 
— 
Capital calls on limited partnership investments
 
(982)  
(2,454)  
(3,722) 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
(13,355)  
(2,454)  
40,543 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
 
— 
 
— 
 
30,000 
Repayments on short-term borrowings
 
— 
 
(30,000)  
— 
Dividends paid
 
(18,745)  
(18,567)  
(15,887) 
Cash received on exercise of stock options
 
1,874 
 
3,140 
 
2,998 
Repurchase of subordinated debentures
 
(34,599)  
(4,729)  
— 
Maturities of subordinated debentures
 
— 
 
(2,625)  
— 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
 
(51,470)  
(52,781)  
17,111 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
(39,822)  
(12,112)  
70,906 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
87,698 
 
99,810 
 
28,904 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$ 
47,876 
$ 
87,698 
$ 
99,810 
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
139

Item 9. 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
Item 9A. 
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures — As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation 
was performed by the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief 
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and 
procedures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and 
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control 
objectives, and management was required to apply judgment in evaluating its controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, 
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange 
Act”)) were effective at the end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting — Our management is responsible for 
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). At December 31, 2024, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial 
reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “2013 Internal Control - 
Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the 
assessment, management determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 
2024, based on the specified criteria. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2024, 
has been audited by Forvis Mazars, LLP (“Forvis”), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report, 
which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Remediation of Material Weakness — As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 
year ended December 31, 2023, as amended on February 26, 2025, management identified a material weakness relating to 
controls over employees’ ability to initiate certain manual transfers between deposit accounts.
The circumstances that led to the material weakness were first identified during 2024, prompting management to re-
evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 
2023. On February 21, 2025, based on this reevaluation, and after discussion with Forvis, management determined that the 
previously-identified circumstances constituted a material weakness, and determined that the material weakness existed as of 
December 31, 2023, and continued to exist as of March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024. During the year 
ended December 31, 2024, we developed and implemented a remediation plan to correct the circumstances that led to the 
material weakness.
Based on management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of and for 
the year ending December 31, 2024, management concluded that we had effectively remediated this material weakness and that, 
as stated above, our controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2024.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting — Except for the remediation actions discussed above, there were 
no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(f) 
under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to 
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — Our management, including our Chief 
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over 
financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and implemented, can 
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a 
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative 
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute 
assurance that all control issues within a company are detected.
140

Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee 
Origin Bancorp, Inc. 
Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Origin Bancorp’s (Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, 
based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all 
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria 
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United 
States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for 
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and our report dated February 27, 2025 expressed 
an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for 
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying 
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the 
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and 
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting 
was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over 
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and 
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such 
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance 
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of reliable financial statements for external 
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial 
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable 
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide 
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are 
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide 
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the 
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. 
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may 
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or 
procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
February 27, 2025
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
141

Item 9B. 
Other Information
Pursuant to Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K, none of our directors or executive officers adopted, terminated or 
modified a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement during the quarter ended December 
31, 2024
Item 9C. 
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.
142

PART III
Item 10. 
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for 
our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
Item 11.  
Executive Compensation 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for 
our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
Item 12. 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder 
Matters
With the exception of the equity compensation plan information provided below, the information required by this 
Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for our 2025 Annual Meeting of 
Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
Information regarding stock-based compensation awards outstanding and available for future grants at December 31, 
2024, is presented in the table below. Additional information regarding stock-based compensation plans is presented in Note 
13 — Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this 
report.
(a) Number of Securities 
to be Issued upon 
Exercise of Outstanding 
Options, Warrants and 
Rights
(b) Weighted Average 
Exercise Price of 
Outstanding Options, 
Warrants and Rights
(c) Number of Securities 
Remaining Available for 
Future Issuance Under 
Equity Compensation 
Plans (Excluding 
Securities Reflected in 
Column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by 
stockholders (1)
 
619,557 (2)
N/A
 
1,371,038 (3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by 
stockholders (4)
 
225,834 
 
32.24 (5)  
— 
Total
 
845,391 
N/A
 
1,371,038 
____________________________
(1)
Includes the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) and Origin Bancorp Inc. 
2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).
(2)
Includes (i) 352,002 shares that may be issued upon settlement of RSUs; (ii) 265,197 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding PSUs, based on 
certified financial results, where applicable, and otherwise assuming the target award is met; and (iii) 2,358 shares that are deferred and may be issued 
upon the settlement date in accordance with the participant’s election. 
(3)
Includes (i) 499,998 shares that may be issued pursuant to future awards under the Omnibus Plan, all of which may be issued pursuant to grants of full-
value stock awards; (ii) 871,040 shares that maybe issued pursuant to future awards under the ESPP. 
(4)
Includes 4,800 options that were granted in 2010 prior to the establishment of the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and 221,034 options 
assumed under the 2012 BTH Equity Incentive Plan.
(5)
The weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights relates solely to stock options, which are the only currently 
outstanding exercisable security, and does not relate to restricted stock units that convert to shares of common stock for no consideration.
We know of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a 
subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.
Further information regarding security ownership of our 5% stockholders and our directors, director nominees and 
executive officers required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for our 
2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
Item 13.  
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for 
our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
143

Item 14. 
Principal Accounting Fees and Services 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement (Schedule 14A) for 
our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
144

PART IV
Item 15. 
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this Report:
(1) Financial Statements: Reference is made to the information set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules: All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are either not 
applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or 
the notes thereto is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) Exhibits: See (b) below.
(b) Exhibits:
2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Origin Bancorp, Inc. and BT Holdings, Inc. dated February 23, 2022 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 24, 2022 
3.1
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed 
on April 28, 2020 
3.2
Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2020
4.1
Specimen common stock certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on 
Form S-1 filed April 10, 2018
4.2
Description of Common Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 2019
Instruments defining the rights of holders of the long-term debt securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are omitted 
pursuant to section (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish copies of these 
instruments to the SEC upon request.
10.1 *
Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s 10-Q filed for 
the quarter ended March 31, 2021
10.2 *
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 28, 2018
10.3 *
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the Community Trust Financial Corporation 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 10, 2018 
10.4 *
BT Holdings, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Registrant’s Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 filed August 1, 2022
10.5 *
2020 Restated Employment Agreement, dated February 27, 2020, by and between Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Drake Mills, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019
10.6 *
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Plan, effective May 1, 2008, between Community Trust Bank and 
Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 
10.7 *
Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated March 30, 2001, by and between Community Trust Bank and Drake 
Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 
S-1 filed April 19, 2018
10.8 *
Amended and Restated Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated April 25, 2018, by and 
among New York Life Insurance Company, Origin Bank and Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to 
Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 27, 2018
10.9 *
Amended and Restated Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated April 26, 2018, by and 
among Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, Origin Bank and Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 
10.14 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 27, 2018
10.10 *
Amended and Restated Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated February 27, 2020, by and between 
Origin Bank and Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 2019
Exhibit 
Number
Description
145

10.11 *
2020 Restated Employment Agreement, dated February 27, 2020, by and between Origin Bancorp, Inc. and M. Lance Hall, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019
10.12 *
§409A Amended & Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement, dated December 13, 2008, by and between 
Community Trust Bank and M. Lance Hall, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 to the 
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2018
10.13 *
Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated September 4, 2002, by and between Community 
Trust Bank and M. Lance Hall, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s 
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2018
10.14 *
Amendment to the Life Insurance Endorsement Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated December 8, 2008, by and between 
Community Trust Bank and M. Lance Hall, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 1 to the 
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2018
10.15 *
Amendment to the Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated December 18, 2009, by and 
between Community Trust Bank and M. Lance Hall, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Amendment No. 1 to the 
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 19, 2018
10.16 *
Executive Supplemental Income Agreement, dated October 29, 2019, by and between Origin Bank and M. Lance Hall, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2019 
10.17 *
Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated October 29, 2019, by and between Origin Bank and M. Lance 
Hall, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 31, 2019
10.18 *
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated August 17, 2018, by and between Origin Bank and Stephen H. Brolly, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 21, 2018
10.19 *
Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated August 17, 2018, by and between Origin Bank and Stephen H. 
Brolly, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 21, 2018
10.20 *
Change in Control Agreement, dated March 28, 2018, among Origin Bank, Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Preston Moore 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020
10.21 *
Change in Control Agreement, dated June 14, 2018, among Origin Bank, Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Jimmy R. Crotwell, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed for year ended December 31, 2021
10.22 *
Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.23 *
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.24 *
Change in Control Agreement, dated February 22, 2022, among Origin Bank, Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Derek McGee, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.25 *
Termination of Change in Control Agreement, dated August 8, 2022, among Origin Bancorp, Inc., Origin Bank and Stephen 
Brolly, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.26 * 
Change in Control Agreement, dated July 27, 2022, among Origin Bank, Origin Bancorp, Inc. and William Wallace, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 27, 2022
10.27 *
Employment Agreement between Origin Bancorp, Inc., and Stephen Brolly, dated August 8, 2022, incorporated by reference 
to Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 27, 2022
10.28 *
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 24, 2022, among BTH Bank, N.A, BT Holdings, Inc., and Lori Sirman, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.29 *
Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2025, among Origin Bank and Lori Sirman
10.30 *
Origin Bancorp, Inc., Origin Bank Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 8, 2022, incorporated by 
reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.31 *
Origin Bancorp, Inc., Origin Bank Long Term Equity Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 8, 2022, incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.32 *
Form of Incentive Agreement for Performance Unit Award under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, dated 
December 13, 2022, by and between Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the 
Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
10.33 *
Form of Incentive Agreement for Restricted Stock Unit Award under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, 
dated December 13, 2022, by and between Origin Bancorp, Inc. and Drake Mills, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 
to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 22, 2023
Exhibit 
Number
Description
146

10.34 *
Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 
8-K filed April 30, 2021
10.35*
Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company's Definitive Proxy 
Statement Schedule 14 A filed March 14, 2024
10.36*
Form of Incentive Agreement for Director Restricted Stock Awards under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2024
10.37*
Form of Incentive Agreement for Restricted Stock Unit Awards under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2024
10.38*
Form of Incentive Agreement for Performance Unit Awards under the Origin Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, 
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2024
19
Insider Trading Policy
21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
97
Origin Bancorp, Inc. Clawback Policy, dated October 2, 2023 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97 to the Company’s 
Form 10-K filed February 28, 2024
101
The following financial information from Origin Bancorp, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 2024, is formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) 
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in 
Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial 
Statements
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
Exhibit 
Number
Description
 * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Item 16. 
Form 10-K Summary
None.
147

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to 
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
(Registrant)
Date: February 27, 2025
By: /s/ Drake Mills
Drake Mills
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
148

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following 
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Date
/s/ Drake Mills
February 27, 2025
Drake Mills, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ William J. Wallace, IV
February 27, 2025
William J. Wallace, IV, Chief Financial Officer/Senior Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Stephen H. Brolly
February 27, 2025
Stephen H. Brolly, Chief Accounting Officer/Senior Executive Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Daniel Chu
February 27, 2025
Daniel Chu, Director 
/s/ James S. D’Agostino
February 27, 2025
James S. D’Agostino, Director
/s/ James E. Davison, Jr.
February 27, 2025
James E. Davison, Jr., Director
/s/ Jay Dyer 
February 27, 2025
Jay Dyer, Director
/s/ A. La’Verne Edney
February 27, 2025
A. La’Verne Edney, Director
/s/ Meryl Farr
February 27, 2025
Meryl Farr, Director
/s/ Richard Gallot, Jr.
February 27, 2025
Richard Gallot, Jr., Director
/s/ Stacey W. Goff
February 27, 2025
Stacey W. Goff, Director
/s/ Cecil Jones
February 27, 2025
Cecil Jones, Director
/s/ Michael A. Jones
February 27, 2025
Michael A. Jones, Director
/s/ Gary E. Luffey
February 27, 2025
Gary E. Luffey, Director
/s/ Farrell J. Malone
February 27, 2025
Farrell J. Malone, Director
/s/ Lori Sirman 
February 27, 2025
Lori Sirman, Director
/s/ Elizabeth E. Solender
February 27, 2025
Elizabeth E. Solender, Director
/s/ Steven Taylor
February 27, 2025
Steven Taylor, Director
149

[This page intentionally left blank]

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORIGIN BANCORP, INC. / ORIGIN BANK
Daniel Chu
Founder, CEO & Chairman
Tricolor Holdings
James D’Agostino, Jr.
Managing Director
Encore Interests LLC
James Davison, Jr.
Director 
Genesis Energy, L.P.
(NYSE: GEL)
Jay Dyer
Co-Founder
& Managing Partner
Park Hollow Capital
A. La’Verne Edney
Litigation Partner
Butler Snow LLP
Meryl Farr	
	
President & Owner
Kennedy Rice Mill
Richard Gallot, Jr.
President & CEO
University of Louisiana 
System
Stacey Goff
Executive Vice President &
General Counsel (Retired)
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
(NYSE: LUMN)
Lance Hall
President &
Chief Executive Officer
Origin Bank
Cecil Jones
Certified Public Accountant
Financial Institutions
Group Partner (Retired)
Whitely Penn LLP
Michael Jones
Certified Public Accountant
Sole Practitioner
Gary Luffey
Medical Doctor
Allegiance Health
Management
Farrell Malone
Partner (Retired)
KPMG LLP
Drake Mills
Chairman, President & 
Chief Executive Officer
Origin Bancorp, Inc.
Chairman
Origin Bank
Lori Sirman
Regional President
Origin Bank
Elizabeth Solender
President
Solender/Hall, Inc.
Steven Taylor
President
Car Town of Monroe, Inc.
1,2
*
4
5
6
3
Drake Mills - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, Origin Bancorp, Inc. / Chairman, Origin Bank
Lance Hall - President & Chief Executive Officer, Origin Bank
1. Lead Independent Director  2. Chair, Finance Committee  3. Chair, Risk Committee  4. Chair, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
5. Chair, Audit Committee  6. Chair, Compensation Committee
*Origin Bank Board Member Only
Warrie Birdwell
Regional President
North Texas
Steve Brolly
Chief Accounting Officer
Russ Chase
Chief Community Banking Officer 
Jim Crotwell
Chief Risk Officer 
Gerardo Garza
Market Executive
North Texas 
Brandi Gregg
Chief Compliance Officer 
Josh Hammett
Chief Information Officer 
David Harrison
Chief Audit Executive 
David Helms
Chief Experience Officer 
Carmen Jordan
Regional President
Houston 
Ryan Kilpatrick
Chief Brand &
Communications Officer 
Brandi Kyzar
Strategic Project Director 
Larry Little
State President
Louisiana 
Jim Lykes
Market Executive
Houston 
Derek McGee
Chief Legal Counsel
Regina McNeill
Director of Strategic Planning & 
Market Analytics 
Preston Moore
Chief Credit & 
Banking Officer 
Ashlea Price
Chief Human Resources
Officer 
Jody Proler
Chief Operating Officer
Houston 
Larry Ratzlaff
State President
Mississippi 
Chris Reigelman
Director of Investor Relations &
Corporate Sustainability
Lonnie Scarborough
Chief Dream Manager &
Talent Development Officer
Lori Sirman
Regional President
East Texas 
Nate Sommer
Regional President
Southeast
Chelsea Stephens
Director of Finance &
Corporate Development 
Wally Wallace
Chief Financial Officer
Debbie Williamson
Chief Operations
Officer
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP

www.Origin.bank
500 South Service Road East, Ruston, LA 71270  ·  Member FDIC