ORIGO PARTNERS PLC
REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017
CONTENTS
Page
I.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Chairman’s letter 3
Director’s report 10
II.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 12
III. AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 16
Consolidated statement of financial position 17
Consolidated statement of changes in equity 18
Consolidated statement of cash flows 19
Notes to the financial statements 20
2
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Shareholders,
Origo’s net asset value as at year end 2017 was $14.1 million as compared with $46.0 million a year
earlier. The drop in NAV is primarily a function of substantial write downs of Company assets. China
Rice has been written down from $31.4 million to nil; Unipower has been written down from $15.8 million
to nil; Moly World has been written down from $3.8 million to nil; and, as explained in more detail
below, most other assets have been written down as well. These write downs follow the appointment
and subsequent election of a new board and our efforts to take a hard look at the Company, its
assets and cost structure to better implement the realization strategy the shareholders voted for in
November 2014 – a strategy that has not led to much in the way of realizations and has so far failed
to generate distributable cash.
Origo’s New Board
The Origo board was reconstituted over several months with the addition of three new directors and
the resignations of three directors. In September 2017, Hiroshi Funaki joined the Origo board as a
nominee of Origo’s largest ordinary shareholder. On 31 October 2017, I joined the Origo board as a
nominee of our largest preference shareholder. Also on 31 October 2017, Philip Scales joined the
board as an independent director. Concurrent with the appointments of Philip Scales and me, two
of the sitting directors resigned. On 20 April 2018, the third sitting director resigned in connection with
the restructuring of the advisory arrangement, and I was elected the Company’s Chairman.
In the months the new board has been in place, our primary focus has been to establish more robust
controls over company assets, strengthen the Company’s capital position by repaying debt, reduce
costs, renegotiate the advisory agreement, clarify what the Company owns and begin to promote
the realization of company assets so cash can be distributed to Origo’s shareholders.
Origo Circa Late 2017
Origo is a company that primarily holds minority interests in very illiquid private equity with a focus on
China and natural resources in Mongolia. The private equity is typically held through offshore structures
far removed from the ultimate assets. The Company is managed at the board level with a third-party
advisor, a British Virgin Islands (BVI) legal entity, that operates out of a Company office in Beijing.
Origo typically does not own assets but rather owns equity in shell companies in offshore jurisdictions.
These shell companies may then own equity in onshore companies, which may then own physical
assets or legal rights to engage in certain activities, typically rights or purported rights to extract
minerals. So, for example, in 2011 and 2012 the Company invested about $28 million in “China Rice
Ltd.”, a company domiciled in the BVI. In return for its $28 million investment, Origo received unsecured
debt and equity in that BVI company. China Rice owns no assets other than equity in “Winrich
International Industry Limited,” a Hong Kong company. Winrich International Industry Limited owns no
assets other than equity in “Jilin Dechun Grains Processing Company, Ltd.” (“Jilin Dechun Grains”).
Jilin Dechun Grains is a Chinese registered legal entity located in Jilin Province, a province in northern
China that in part abuts North Korea. Jilin Dechun Grains is controlled by one Li Dechun – hence the
name Jilin Dechun Grains.
I will get into Jilin Dechun Grains (a/k/a China Rice) a little bit later but the point here is that the
Company’s ownership interest in any assets that might have value (Jilin Dechun Grains’ inventory,
plant and equipment, property, and good will) is far removed both geographically and legally from
Origo’s debt and equity interests in China Rice, a BVI company. Although the China Rice example
may be an extreme example of ownership far removed from operating assets (the China Rice
investment has two layers of offshore entities), the basic legal structure – Origo owning a minority
interest in an offshore company that owns equity in an onshore company – is typical. The problem
with this layered form of legal ownership is it is difficult to understand what you really own since your
ownership rights are determined by the laws of several jurisdictions, which may be inconsistent, and
3
Chairman’s Letter (continued)
the control rights typically sit at a different legal layer from where the assets sit. And, if it is hard to
understand what you own, it is a fortiori hard to understand the value of what you own.
The Company’s cash position when we assumed office was negligible. Prior to the former directors
resigning, they had paid themselves about $259,000 as unpaid accrued board fees, and they had
also paid the Company’s investment advisor, Origo Advisors Limited (“OAL”) $1.3 million as unpaid
fees to that entity. So, when we joined the board the Company had a cash position of about $1 million
and, even allowing for the payments listed above, debt of about $3.2 million. The debt comprised
money owed to the OAL and to a third-party lender. OAL was owed about $700,000 and the third
party a minimum of $2.5 million plus 12% interest with a minimum repayment obligation.
The obligation to OAL arose from the Company’s failure to pay fees in accordance with a contract
the Company entered in 2014 and purported to bear interest at a minimum of 8% and a maximum
of whatever interest rate the Company was paying others while the OAL debt remained outstanding.
The obligation to the private investor arose in late 2016 when the Company borrowed $2.5 million to
meet obligations, primarily fees owed to a law firm. The terms of that loan were that interest accrued
at 12% annually with the Company obliged to repay $3.75 million if the loan was held to its full term.
Perhaps because of its history, Origo did not have a typical fund structure. The typical fund structure
includes a third-party manager managing the Company’s assets and a third-party administrator
controlling the company’s bank accounts and maintaining the company’s books and records.
Separation of functions is important because the manager asking for payment for some obligation
and the third-party administrator, usually a regulated entity, having signature authority over company
bank accounts, and thus making payment, is a safeguard against fraud. In Origo, the Company did
not technically have a third-party manager but, rather, an “Advisor” (OAL) with the primary
responsibility of “advising” the board rather than managing the Company’s assets. A principal of OAL
also sat on the Origo board and served as Origo’s Executive Director. OAL also controlled the
Company bank accounts and maintained most of the Company’s records.
The Defective 2014 Advisory Agreement
In November 2014, the Company entered into an advisory agreement with OAL. OAL at that time
seems to have been controlled by several, but not all, of the people who were involved in setting up
the Company some years earlier. The 2014 agreement was entered into concurrent with the
shareholder vote in November 2014 for a “realization strategy” for the disposal of the Company’s
assets. The purported purpose of the 2014 Agreement was to provide “asset realization support
services” so the Company could “realise its portfolio of assets and distribute net realisation proceeds
to its shareholders.” The Advisory Agreement had a four-year term and provided for total fixed fees
of $6.5 million over that period plus incentive fees that kicked in once $90 million had been distributed
to shareholders.
The contract did not properly incentivize OAL to realise assets in accordance with the 2014
shareholder vote. It is plainly defective, at least in hindsight, because it failed to accomplish its
purported purpose – promote the realization of assets and cash distributions to shareholders.
First, it should have been apparent that given the quality of the Origo portfolio it was highly unlikely
that the $90 million hurdle would be reached within the four-year period and therefore the contract
had no real incentives for asset realization. Second, the fixed component of the compensation
structure was disproportionately large compared to the incentive component of the compensation
structure and this too should have been apparent at the time the contract was entered into. Third,
there was no claw back provision in the event that the $90 million hurdle was not reached so there
was no penalty if OAL accomplished very little, which is how things played out. Fourth, the contract
imposed no real objective duties on OAL in return for the $6.5 million. In fact, there was no real
obligation imposed on OAL to accomplish much of anything.
4
Rather, in return for the $6.5 million OAL was obliged to a provide a menu of anodyne services such
as “provide support” to the Origo board, “provide research and reports” to that same board and
“monitor and analyse the performance of the portfolio.” The advisory contract thus guaranteed OAL
a substantial amount of money in fees, a number certainly very substantial in comparison with a fair
and objective valuation of the portfolio, while it failed to set any real bar for the payment of those
fees.
Not surprisingly, when the 2014 Agreement was terminated with effect from year end 2017, total
realizations over the three-year period were a little in excess of what OAL received in fees. Nothing
about Origo is ever very clear, but our calculations indicate that over the period of the contract OAL
accrued about $5.4 million in fees and interest in return for asset realizations amounting to about
$7 million. The Company though had other operating costs besides the OAL fees, and so, net to the
Company, substantially less was received from asset sales than went to pay OAL, the Origo board,
and various service providers.
The New Board’s Efforts to Impose a New Order
Some of these issues are sunk costs, a product of bad decisions made in the past, while others can
be remedied by a new board with a new focus. Following period end, we repaid the outstanding
debt at the face amount of $2.5 million with no interest or penalties. We also settled in full the unpaid
fees due to OAL as part of the renegotiation of the advisory arrangement. We terminated the
Company’s Nomad and administrator and replaced them with companies that we believe will offer
better services at more appropriate prices. The Company bank accounts are now under the control
of our third-party administrator and we are trying to collect company records, so they can be
reviewed and maintained by the new administrator. We terminated the Company’s public relations
firm, and I will take care of public relations and shareholder communications as part of my duties.
We retained a new law firm, which I believe will better meet the Company’s needs. We have
renegotiated the audit fee, which has come down this year and we hope can come down further
as assets are sold and the size of the portfolio is reduced.
Most importantly in terms of cost, we agreed with the advisor to terminate the former advisory
agreement and replaced it with a new agreement effective 1 January 2018 that is entirely incentive
based. The new advisory agreement waives OAL’s entitlement to a fixed fee of $1 million for 2018 and
any future fixed fees in return for 8% of all cash returned to shareholders with a hold back of 25% of
that amount until Origo’s entire portfolio is sold. Board approval is required for any asset sales to
prevent a fire sale and to ensure realizations are at appropriate prices considering market conditions.
The Company can now terminate the new agreement without penalty on 90 days’ notice.
The Company will continue to fund certain operating costs incurred in connection with Origo including
a modest office share arrangement in Beijing and limited personnel costs. Origo has budgeted
$280,000 for total Beijing operating costs for 2018 and will continually review these costs with the
objective of bringing them down further.
Origo’s Portfolio
Origo’s portfolio can be divided into miscellaneous investments in China (China Rice, Niutech, and
Unipower) and investments in mining assets primarily, though not entirely, in Mongolia (Celadon,
Kincora, Moly World, and Gobi Coal). With the exception of Niutech, all of these investments are
problematic. Although we have put substantial effort into understanding the Company’s portfolio (in
early July we will be making our third trip to China to meet with our Advisor, co-investors and investee
companies) we are still endeavouring to understand the real worth of these investments and then
determine realistic realization strategies. I hope that when our midyear report is published we will have
more clarity on these issues.
5
Chairman’s Letter (continued)
Chinese Investments
Our Chinese investments comprise Niutech, China Rice and Unipower Battery. Niutech is a successful
investment, which we are in the process of exiting, so far at book value. The other two investments
are problematic and have been written down to nil. It is, as of the date of this letter, unclear whether
any of the value of these two companies is recoverable.
China Rice
China Rice was our largest investment at year end 2016 with a carrying value of $31.4 million and
comprised about a third of the Company’s assets. Based on legal advice from Beijing counsel, we
have written the asset down to nil.
About a month ago OAL informed the Origo Board that Jilin Dechun Grain was party to a court order
made by the Liaoyuan City Intermediary Court, under which Jilin Dechun Grain’s assets were to be
sold to satisfy obligations to the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (“ICBC”) in connection with
the alleged non-payment of a debt. As explained above, Jilin Dechun Grain is a PRC registered
company that holds the operating assets of Origo’s China Rice investment. If those assets are
foreclosed on to satisfy legal Jilin Dechun Grain’s legal obligations, Origo’s investment in China Rice
is worthless.
Origo retained Beijing based counsel to investigate this surprising situation and advise the board on
Origo’s possible remedies. Counsel has informed us that Jilin Dechun Grain defaulted on its obligation
to ICBC sometime in 2017 and that pursuant to enforcement orders Jilin Dechun Grain was ordered
to pay ICBC approximately $42 million, which now, with interest, amounts to about $45 million. Jilin
does not appear to have the $45 million to satisfy the obligation. It further appears that ICBC has sold
the defaulted debt to a third party, which has approached the principal of Jilin Dechun Grain, Li
Dechun, with an offer to sell that debt back to the Company at a discounted price. It also appears
that Jilin Dechun Grain has other unsatisfied debts (in addition to the $45 million) that have been the
subject of other court orders.
The full situation at Jilin Dechun Grains is as of this date unclear. We will be traveling to China in early
July to try to meet Mr. Li and the apparent current owner of the defaulted debt, Great Wall Investment
Group Ltd., a substantial Chinese asset manager, to determine if any value can be recovered.
China Rice is and always has been a curious investment. Its operating subsidiary, Jilin Dechun Grain,
is not a well-known company. Its principal, Mr. Li, is not a well-known Chinese businessman. Jilin
Dechun Grain is based not in Beijing but in an obscure part of north-eastern China. As outlined above,
the Company’s investment in Jilin Dechun Grain seems to have been made in a very indirect way.
Origo’s debt has a BVI shell company as the counterparty and is not secured with any assets in China.
Origo’s equity is in a BVI company so Origo has no equity in Jilin Dechun Grains, the legal entity that
holds the structure’s assets. There does not seem to be an opinion letter when the investment was
made explaining why this structure was used and how Origo might enforce its rights in the event of a
dispute.
The accounts of Jilin Dechun Grain have to the best of my knowledge never been audited by a
recognized auditing firm and have not been audited by anyone since year end 2015. The 2015
accounts purport to have been audited by an unrecognized local auditing firm so the validity of
those accounts is open to question. The company’s unaudited 2016 accounts show that Jilin Dechun
Grains’ sales have been declining for a number of years. According to these financial statements,
Jilin Dechun Grains’ revenues in 2016 were about 80% lower than its revenues in 2012. The explanation
we have been given is for this decline in sales is unclear. We travelled to China in March and
endeavoured to meet the China Rice principal, Mr. Li, but were rebuffed because Mr. Li said he was
too “busy” to meet with us.
6
As of the date of this letter, we do not have a clear understanding of why Jilin Dechun Grain defaulted
on the debt. As of the unaudited 2016 balance sheet, Jilin Dechun Grain represented that its total
debt amounted to about 46% of its then current assets – hardly the kind of numbers that should throw
a company into default. In China a company’s managing director has a lot of authority over
company assets so whether company assets were pledged for obligations unrelated to Origo’s
investment is a real possibility.
Origo has an investment agreement with China Rice that provides Origo with a number of rights
including approval rights before any debt is incurred, but Origo seems never to have asserted its rights.
An individual OAL procured at some point in the past sits on the board of Jilin Dechun Grains on behalf
of Origo but does not seem to have exercised any board powers over the company’s business, its
debt, or the default. Given that at least some of the issues involving the China Rice investment
occurred during the watch of the old Origo board, we are unclear about how the previous board
monitored this investment. We will be inquiring why they failed to inform the market of the ICBC default
when it occurred – which according to Chinese counsel was no later than the summer of 2017.
Unipower Battery Ltd.
Unipower is or was a battery manufacturer for electric vehicles. The company does not appear to
be operational, has several judgments against it and seems to have legal problems. The company
shares office space with OAL in Beijing. Like China Rice, we are unclear about the circumstances
surrounding the original investment and why the company has fared so poorly. The company now
has a plan to relocate to another province in return for some sort of assistance from that provincial
government. It is unclear if this plan will come to fruition and if it did how this might benefit Origo. We
have recently retained counsel in Beijing to investigate this investment but given that it does not
appear to be a going concern we have valued it at nil.
Mining Investments
Origo has a number of mining investments. Most of these companies are not really going concerns in
the sense of companies that extract minerals and then sell them on to a processor or end user. Rather
they are typically companies that own exploration licenses or rights to extract minerals. I think it is fair
to say that none of these investments has been satisfactory.
Moly World Ltd.
In 2011 Origo invested $10 million in Moly World Ltd., a BVI company, for 20% of that company’s equity
as well as offtake rights to 20% of that company’s future production. Moly World in turn owns the
Mongol Resource Corporation (“MRC”), a Mongolian company that own the rights to explore a
substantial molybdenum deposit in Mongolia. Molybdenum has had its ups and downs in the world
markets, though in recent years the movement has mostly been down. On Origo’s year end 2016
balance sheet this investment was carried at US$3.78 million largely because of the decline in global
molybdenum prices.
In April 2018, MRC received a notification from the Mineral Resource Authority for Mongolia cancelling
the mining license issued to MRC in August 2017. It appears that there are questions whether the
mining license was validly granted given that the Mongolian governmental authority claims that the
company’s mineral deposits overlap with a protected area. One would typically expect an investor
like Origo to have a legal opinion as to the validity of the rights being purchased but that opinion, as
with China Rice, does not seem to exist. Moly World has retained counsel to protect its rights over the
mining license. Given the uncertainty of MRC’s legal right to mine the mineral and the additional
uncertainty of the judicial process in Mongolia, Origo’s board believes that the appropriate carrying
value for this asset is nil.
7
Chairman’s Letter (continued)
Kincora Copper Limited
Kincora is a public company listed on the Toronto venture exchange. As of the end of March, Kincora
had a market capitalization of about $8 million and an enterprise value of about $6 million. Origo
owned about a quarter of the company. Kincora’s story is that it owns mining rights to possible copper
deposits in Mongolia that some think promising given the proximity of those rights to substantial copper
deposits. Nonetheless, Kincora’s most recent drilling efforts have been unsuccessful, and we have
seen no objective evidence that these exploration rights have real value.
Kincora does not seem to have sufficient funds to engage in full scale exploration as Kincora’s last
reported net cash position is about $2.1 million. It would thus appear that any substantial future
exploration will require additional capital and hence the issuance of more equity or the formation of
a joint venture with a third party. Kincora’s managers are not based in Mongolia. Nor have they made
significant cash investments in the company. Their compensation most recently has been with Kincora
shares. Given the company’s diminutive size and dwindling cash position we had asked the Kincora
board to put the company up for sale but were rebuffed. We retained Canadian counsel and
explored the possibility of a more aggressive approach to Kincora but concluded that the costs would
likely outweigh any likely benefit. In light of Kincora’s obvious corporate governance issues, weak
capital position and lack of demonstrable success we determined that this investment was entirely
speculative. Earlier this month we exited our entire position in Kincora for net proceeds of about
$1.5 million, which represented the market price of these shares as of the sale date.
Celadon Mining Ltd.
Origo invested $13.1 million for about 8.9% of Celadon Mining, which is a private company with mining
rights to the Chang Tang West thermal coal deposits in Ordos, Inner Mongolia (i.e., China). The year
end 2017 carrying value of Celadon Mining is about $4.5 million as compared with $20.1 million as at
year end 2016. The majority shareholder has reported that he is in complex negotiations to monetize
the Chang Tang West asset. As a minority shareholder, Origo is not a participant in the negotiations
and depends on reports from the majority shareholder leading the negotiation. We have written down
this investment because of the apparent lack of clear progress in the negotiations for the sale of the
Chang Tang West asset and the uncertainty over the timing and amount of subsequent cash flows
to Origo if the sale were concluded.
Gobi Coal and Energy Ltd.
Origo invested, net of a subsequent divestiture, $15 million in Gobi Coal, which is a BVI registered
holding company that through its ownership of local companies in Mongolia has mining rights for
coking coal and uranium in that country. Origo owns 7.5% of Gobi Coal but the company is controlled
by Aabar, which I am told is an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund. Origo earlier had a board seat but
was forced off the board some years ago and consequently has no current ability to direct this
investment. The company has had a series of legal disputes resulting in the freezing and confiscation
of their licenses that seem to have been resolved in 2018. Gobi Coal’s management, put in place by
Aabar, say they will monetize this investment over the next several years. Subsequent to year-end
2017, Origo acquired 377,894 additional Gobi Coal shares at $0.01 per share for about $6,000 in total.
Origo carries this investment at about $1.1 million, which represents a write down of about 60% from
its 2016 carrying value because of corporate governance issues and the absence of clear visibility
for any exit.
* * * *
8
The Origo story is obviously unsatisfactory. Large amounts of money were invested in companies that
now appear worthless or of limited value. For certain investments, the issues seem longstanding rather
than a function of some event that transpired between the publication of the Company’s last set of
accounts and this one. Although the Company has been in a realization mode for close to four years,
no cash has been returned to shareholders, and the current prospects of cash distributions are
uncertain. Private equity and emerging markets are risky asset classes. When you combine the two
asset classes the risks may increase exponentially rather than arithmetically. Nonetheless, my
overriding impression of Origo is that proper care has not been exercised in a number of respects
over a substantial period of time. There may be other issues as well. We are working with lawyers in
various jurisdictions on a prudent basis to best determine how to recover value. I will report further in
due course.
Very truly yours,
John D. Chapman
Chairman
Origo Partners Plc
Date: 28 June 2018
9
Directors’ Report
The Directors present their report together with the audited financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2017.
Results and dividends
The result of the Group for the year is set out on page 16 and shows a loss for the year of US$82,984,000
(2016:US$12,257,000). The performance, and the share capital structure of the Group, neither justifies
nor allows the payment of a dividend at the current time. The Directors are therefore not able to
recommend the payment of a dividend for 2017 (2016: US$nil). The retained loss of the year of
US$82,984,000 (2016:US$12,257,000) has been transferred to reserves.
Principal activities, review of business and future developments
On 20 November 2014, the Company’s Investing Policy changed from that of a closed-ended,
permanent capital vehicle to that of a realisation company with the mandate to return the net
proceeds of realisations to shareholders over a 4 year period. However, investments will only be
realised when the Independent Directors believe the terms are appropriate. A detailed review of the
business of the Company is covered in the Chairman’s Report.
Directors
At 31 December 2017
Mr John Chapman (appointed October 2017)
Mr Philip Peter Scales (appointed October 2017)
Mr Hiroshi Funaki (appointed September 2017)
Mr. Niklas Ponnert (resigned April 2018)
Ms. Shonaid Jemmett-Page (resigned October 2017)
Mr. Lionel de Saint-Exupery (resigned October 2017)
Options
Ordinary
shares
Shares in
Subsidiaries
4,500,000
2,691,009*
560,000
560,000
1**
* 400,000 Shares are held in Niklas Ponnert’s name, 691,385 Shares are held through Paracelsus Holdings Ltd, and
1,599,624 Shares are held jointly with the EBT pursuant to the Company’s Joint Share Ownership Plan.
** 1 Ordinary share with voting right accounted for 50% of CCF which is one of subsidiaries of the Group is held in Niklas
Ponnert’s name.
Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements
The Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements. The Directors have
elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union. In preparing these financial
statements, the Directors are required to:
•
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them on a consistent basis;
• make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
state whether International Financial Reporting Standards have been followed, subject to any
material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and
prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume
that the company will continue in business.
•
•
10
The Directors are responsible for keeping reliable accounting records which correctly explain the
transactions of the company, and which enable the financial position of the company to be
determined with reasonable accuracy. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the
company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other
irregularities.
Going concern
The Board has concluded that the Company and the Group is considered to be a going concern
and as a result of this the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2017
have been prepared on a going concern basis. Notably, previous disputes with Brooks Macdonald
Asset Management (International) Limited have been settled and the share capital of the Company
has been reorganised so that the redemption of the Redeemable Preference Shares (previously
Convertible Preference Shares) will be settled with the proceeds of realisations as and when they
occur.
Auditor and disclosure of information to auditor
As far as each Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor
is unaware.
Financial statements are published on the Group’s website in accordance with legislation in the Isle
of Man governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from
legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Group’s website is the
responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the
financial statements contained therein.
Each of the Directors has taken all the steps they ought to have taken individually as a Director in
order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the
Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
Auditor
The auditor, BDO Limited, has indicated their willingness to continue in office.
By Order of the Board
Philip Peter Scales
Director
Date: 28 June 2018
11
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF ORIGO PARTNERS PLC
(incorporated in the Isle of Man with limited liability)
OPINION
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Origo Partners Plc (the “Company”) and
its subsidiaries (together the “Group”) set out on pages 16 to 67, which comprise the consolidated
statement of financial position as at 31 December 2017, and the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated
statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements,
including a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated
financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2017 and of its consolidated financial performance
and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) as
adopted by the European Union.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (“ISAs”). Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the
Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements” section of our report. We are independent of the
Group in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics
for Professional Accountants (the “IESBA Code”), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with the IESBA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
KEY AUDIT MATTER
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in
our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were
addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
VALUATION OF UNQUOTED INVESTMENTS
Refer to notes 1.4(d), 14 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements
Out of the total investments of US$17,779,000 as at 31 December 2017, US$7,584,000 of the total
investments have no quoted market price available. Unlisted investments comprise investments at
fair value through profit or loss and convertible credit agreements. Unquoted investments are
measured at fair value, which is established in accordance with IFRS 13 with reference to the
International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines by using measurement of value
such as multiples, discounted cash flow and industry valuation benchmarks. Investments are subject
to annual valuation by management. Due to the significance in the context of the consolidated
financial statements as a whole, they are considered to be one of the areas which had the greatest
effect on our overall audit strategy and allocation of resources in planning and completing our audit.
12
Our response:
Our audit procedures included:
•
•
•
•
Enquiring of management to obtain understanding and assessing the design and
implementation of valuation processes and control in place;
Assessing investment realisations in the period, comparing actual sales proceeds to prior year-
end valuations to understand the reasons for significant variances and determine whether they
are indicative of bias or error in the Group’s approach to valuations;
Challenging key judgments affecting valuations in the context of observed industry best practice
and the provisions of the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines.
In particular, challenging the appropriateness of the valuation basis selected as well as the
underlying assumptions, such as discount factors, and the chosen of benchmark for multiples;
and
Evaluating the appropriateness of valuation methodology used by management and result with
the assistance of valuation specialists.
OTHER INFORMATION
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Company’s annual report, but does not include the consolidated financial statements
and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we
do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the
other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise
appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that
there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have
nothing to report in this regard.
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The directors are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the
preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to
liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The directors are also responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process. The audit
committee of the Company (the “Audit Committee”) assists the directors in discharging their
responsibility in this regard.
13
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT (continued)
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE AUDIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to
issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. This report is made solely to you, as a body, in
accordance with the terms of our engagement, and for no other purpose. We do not assume
responsibility towards or accept liability to any other person for the contents of this report.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted
in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can
arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
consolidated financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain
professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
•
•
•
•
•
•
identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks,
and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
intentional omissions,
resulting
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
involve collusion,
from error, as
fraud may
forgery,
obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting
and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to
events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going
concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in
our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such
disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit
evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.
evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial
statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements
represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities
or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial
statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit.
We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the Audit Committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope
and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal
control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other
14
matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable,
related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the Audit Committee, we determine those matters that were
of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and
are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or
regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances,
we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse
consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits
of such communication.
BDO Limited
Certified Public Accountants
Alfred Lee
Practising Certificate Number P04960
Hong Kong, 28 June 2018
15
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the year ended 31 December 2017
2017 2016
Notes US$’000 US$’000
Investment loss: 2
Realised gains/(losses) on disposal of investments 423 (142)
Unrealised losses on investments (74,440) (6,069)
Income from loans – 627
(74,017) (5,584)
Consulting services payable 3 (1,390) (1,769)
Other income 29 134
Performance fee
– Performance incentive 4 – 4,195
Other administrative expenses 5 (4,856) (3,618)
Share-based payments 27 (21) (67)
Foreign exchange gains 50 178
Net loss before finance costs and taxation (80,205) (6,531)
Finance costs 9 (3,598) (5,791)
Loss before tax (83,803) (12,322)
Income tax credit 10 819 65
Loss after tax (82,984) (12,257)
Other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or
loss in subsequent periods:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations 6 5
Net other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or
loss in subsequent periods 6 5
Tax on other comprehensive income – –
Other comprehensive income net of tax 6 5
Total comprehensive loss after tax (82,978) (12,252)
Loss after tax
Attributable to:
– Owners of the parent (82,984) (12,244)
– Non-controlling interests – (13)
(82,984) (12,257)
Total comprehensive loss
Attributable to:
– Owners of the parent (82,978) (12,239)
– Non-controlling interests – (13)
(82,978) (12,252)
Basic loss per ordinary share 11 (11.70) cents (3.49) cents
Diluted loss per ordinary share 11 (11.70) cents (3.49) cents
Basic loss per redeemable zero dividend preference share 11 (279.57) cents N/A
Diluted loss per redeemable zero dividend preference share 11 (279.57) cents N/A
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
16
Consolidated statement of financial position
At 31 December 2017
2017 2016
Assets Notes US$’000 US$’000
(Restated)
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 12 20 33
Intangible assets – 2
Investments at fair value through profit or loss 14 – 72,023
Loans 15 350 350
370 72,408
Current assets
Investments at fair value through profit or loss 14 17,045 –
Loans due within one year 15 384 24,290
Trade and other receivables 16 881 4,007
Cash and cash equivalents 17 1,199 1,786
19,509 30,083
Total assets 19,879 102,491
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowing 20 2,500 –
Trade and other payables 18 1,381 3,472
Performance incentive payable within one year 18 – 8
Financial guarantee contracts 19 435 435
Current tax liabilities 499 499
4,815 4,414
Non-current liabilities
Long-term borrowing 20 – 2,500
Provision 21 103 82
Redeemable zero dividend preference shares 22 – 47,469
Deferred income tax liability 10 796 2,017
899 52,068
Total liabilities 5,714 56,482
Net assets 14,165 46,009
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
Issued capital 23 56 56
Share premium 150,414 150,414
Share-based payment reserve 5,048 5,048
Accumulated losses (191,613) (109,567)
Translation reserve (1,484) (1,490)
Other reserve 24 51,744 1,056
14,165 45,517
Non-controlling interests – 492
Total equity 14,165 46,009
Total equity and liabilities 19,879 102,491
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for
issue. They were signed on its behalf by:
Philip Peter Scales
Director
28 June 2018
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
17
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Share-
Accu-
based
Share payment mulated
losses
reserve
US$’000
US$’000
Issued
capital premium
US$’000
US$’000
Trans-
lation
reserve
US$’000
Equity
com-
ponent
of CZDP
US$’000
Other
reserve
US$’000
Total
US$’000
Non-
controlling
interests
US$’000
56
150,414
7,573
(135,824)
(1,495)
8,297
1,056
30,077
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(12,244)
–
(12,244)
52
–
(2,577)
2,577
–
5
5
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
27,627
–
35,924
–
(35,924)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Total
equity
US$’000
30,582
(12,257)
5
(12,244)
5
505
(13)
–
(12,239)
(13)
(12,252)
52
–
27,627
–
–
–
–
–
52
–
27,627
–
150,414
5,048
(109,567)
(1,490)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(82,984)
–
(82,984)
–
938
–
6
6
–
–
56
150,414
5,048
(191,613)
(1,484)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,056
45,517
492
46,009
–
–
(82,984)
6
–
–
(82,984)
6
–
50,688
–
51,744
(82,978)
50,688
938
14,165
–
–
(492)
(82,978)
50,688
446
–
14,165
At 1 January 2016
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive
income
Total comprehensive
income/(loss)
Share-based payment
expense
Lapsed of share-based
payment
Change of fair value upon
extinguishment of
convertible zero dividend
preference shares
Released upon
extinguishment of
convertible zero dividend
preference shares
At 31 December 2016
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive
income
Total comprehensive
income/(loss)
Capitalisation of RZDP
Disposal of subsidiaries
At 31 December 2017
Notes
27
27
22
22
22
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
56
–
–
–
–
–
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within parent’s equity:
Reserve
Share premium
Share-based payment reserve
Accumulated losses
Translation reserve
Equity component of CZDP
Other reserve
Description and purpose
Amounts subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value.
Equity created to recognise share-based payment expense.
Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in profit or loss.
Equity created to
differences.
Difference between the proceeds of the convertible zero
dividend preference shares (“CZDP”) issued and the fair value of
the liability component of CZDP.
Own shares acquired, EBT (as defined in Note 24) shares and
capital redemption and capitalisation of redeemable zero
dividend preference shares (“RZDP”).
recognise foreign currency translation
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
18
Consolidated statement of cash flows
For the year ended 31 December 2017
2017 2016
Notes US$’000 US$’000
Loss before tax (83,803) (12,322)
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation 5 14 26
Release of provision for performance incentive 4 – (4,195)
Share-based payments 27 21 67
Provision for bad debts 5 3,386 1,008
Realised (gains)/losses on disposal of investments 2 (423) 142
Unrealised losses on investments at FVTPL* 2 50,526 6,059
Unrealised losses on loans 2 23,914 10
Income from loans 2 – (627)
Gain recognised upon extinguishment of CZDP** 22 – (62)
Foreign exchange gains (50) (178)
Interest expenses 9 3,554 5,773
Operating loss before changes in working capital and provisions (2,861) (4,299)
Proceeds from disposals of investments at FVTPL* 8 4,954 765
Proceeds from repayment of loans 15 – 383
Increase in trade and other receivables (345) (287)
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables (2,395) 1,270
Net cash outflow from operations (647) (2,168)
Investing activities
Disposal of property, plant and equipment – 7
Net cash inflow from investing activities – 7
Financing activities
Proceeds from borrowing 20 – 2,500
Net cash inflow from financing activities – 2,500
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents (647) 339
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 60 175
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 1,786 1,272
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 17 1,199 1,786
* FVTPL refers to fair value through profit or loss
** CZDP refers to convertible zero dividend preference shares
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
19
Notes to the financial statements
1. Accounting policies
1.1 Corporate information
The consolidated financial statements of Origo Partners Plc (“Origo” or the “Company”) and its
subsidiaries (together the “Group”) for the year ended 31 December 2017 were authorised for issue
in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 28 June 2018. The Company is a limited liability
company incorporated and domiciled in the Isle of Man whose shares are publicly traded on the
Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”) of the London Stock Exchange. The registered office is located
at 33-37 Athol Street, Douglas, Isle of Man IM1 1LB. The principal activity of the Group is that of an
Investment vehicle. The Group currently holds investments in companies including unquoted interests,
and illiquid publicly traded equity interests, based or principally active in China and Mongolia.
On 20 November 2014, the Company’s shareholders voted to amend the Company’s investing policy
to that of a realisation vehicle.
1.2 Basis of preparation
The Group’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (“IASB”)
and adopted for use in the European Union (“EU”) and also to comply with relevant Isle of Man law.
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial information
are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods presented, unless
otherwise stated.
(a)
(b)
The financial information set out below is based on the financial statements of the Company
and its subsidiaries for the year ended 31 December 2017.
The consolidated financial information has been prepared under the historical cost convention
except for certain financial instruments, which have been measured at fair value, and in
accordance with IFRS and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee’s
interpretations (“IFRIC”) (collectively “IFRSs”) issued by the IASB.
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost basis.
1.3 Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial information in conformity with IFRSs requires the use of
certain critical accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
information and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Although these estimates are based upon management’s best knowledge of current events and
actions, actual results may differ from those estimates.
The following is a list of accounting policies which cover areas that the directors consider require
estimates and judgements which have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:
(a) Fair value of unquoted equity instruments
The Group has estimated the value of each of its unquoted equity instruments by using their
judgement to select the most appropriate valuation methodology for each investment based on the
recommendations of the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (the
“Guidelines”). For more information on estimation, refer to Note 14. Valuation methodologies mainly
include multiples, discounted cash flow, industry valuation benchmarks, available market prices and
20
so on, which may apply individually or in combination. Key assumptions and judgements of each
methodology concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty will have a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the fair value of the instruments within the next
financial year.
(b) Assessment of the Company as investment entity
Entities that meet the definition of an investment entity within IFRS 10 are required to account for most
investments in controlled entities as held at fair value through profit or loss. Subsidiaries that provide
investment related services or engage in permitted investment related activities with investees
continue to be consolidated unless they are also investment entities. The directors have concluded
that the Company meets the definition of an investment entity.
(c) Assessment of the subsidiaries as investment entities
The Company controls the voting rights and ownership interests in its subsidiaries as stated in Note 13
for which the countries of incorporation for those subsidiaries are included in the same note.
Per IFRS 10, there is a requirement for the Board to assess whether each subsidiary is itself an investment
entity. The Board has performed the assessments and has concluded that the subsidiaries stated in
Note 13 are operating subsidiaries of the Group for the reasons below:
(I)
(II)
Each subsidiary has its own board of directors;
The subsidiaries provide services to the Group (including administrative services to the Board of
the Group, buying / selling securities as well as managing the portfolios on a fair value basis); and
(III)
The subsidiaries are remunerated for these services.
Furthermore, each subsidiary stated in Note 13 is itself not deemed to be an investment entity investing
solely for capital appreciation and investment income and therefore the subsidiaries are
consolidated.
(d) Share-based payments
The Group has applied the requirements of IFRS 2 “Share-based payment” in these consolidated
financial statements.
The Group has issued share options, which are equity-settled share-based payments, to a director,
certain ex-employees and to its advisors for services provided in respect of the admission of the
Company to trading on the AIM of the London Stock Exchange. Equity-settled share-based payments
to directors and employees are measured at the fair value of equity instruments awarded at the date
of grant. Equity-settled share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of
goods or services rendered at the date when the goods or services are received. Where equity
investments are granted subject to vesting conditions, equity-settled share-based payments are
expensed to the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group’s
estimate of the number of shares that will eventually vest. Fair value is measured by use of the
Binominal option pricing model.
The Group has also granted upper share rights/contingent share awards, which are cash-settled
share-based payments, to a director and certain ex-employees under the Company’s JSOS (as defined
in Note 27). The cost of cash-settled share-based payments is measured initially at fair value at the grant
date using the Binominal Tree model. This fair value is expensed over the period until the vesting date
with recognition of a corresponding liability. The liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting
date up to and including the settlement date, with changes in fair value recognised in expense.
21
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
When estimating the value of the share options, the upper share rights and contingent share awards,
significant assumptions such as the expected life of the share options and the upper share rights, and
expected volatility of the shares have been applied based on management’s best estimates.
1.4 Summary of significant accounting policies
The following principal accounting policies have been applied consistently throughout the year in
dealing with items which are considered material in relation to the consolidated financial information.
(a) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its
subsidiaries as at 31 December 2017. Control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to
variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns
through its power over the investee. Specifically, the Group controls an investee if, and only if, the
Group has:
•
•
•
Power over the investee (i.e., existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant
activities of the investee);
Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.
Generally, there is a presumption that a majority of voting rights results in control. To support this
presumption and when the Group has less than a majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee,
the Group considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an
investee, including:
•
•
•
The contractual arrangement(s) with the other vote holders of the investee;
Rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
The Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights.
The Group does not consolidate its subsidiaries other than those that solely provide it with services
that relate to its investment activities. Subsidiaries that provide services to the Group are fully
consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control, and
continue to be consolidated until the date when such control ceases. The financial statements of the
subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent
accounting policies. All intra-group balances, transactions, unrealised gains and losses resulting from
intra-group transactions and dividends are eliminated in full.
Profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are attributed to the
equity holders of the parent of the Group and to the non-controlling interests, even if this results in the
non-controlling interests having a deficit balance.
A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an
equity transaction.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets of
the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised in profit or loss.
22
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. For the
purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the acquisition
date, allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the
combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to those
units.
Subsequent to acquisition, the carrying amount of non-controlling interests that represent present
ownership interests in the subsidiary is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus such
non-controlling interest’s share of subsequent changes in equity. Total comprehensive income is
attributed to such non-controlling interests even if this results in those non-controlling interests having
a deficit balance.
Non-controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets that is not held by the
Group and are presented separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and
within equity in the consolidated statement of financial position, separately from parent shareholders’
equity.
(b) Associates
Associates are all entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally
accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. The Group elects to
measure investments in associates at fair value through profit or loss as, in the opinion of the directors,
the Company meets the definition of venture capital organisation. This treatment is permitted under
IAS 28 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures”.
(c) Foreign currencies
• Functional and presentation currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollar, which is also the parent
company’s functional currency. For each group entity the Group determines functional currency and
items included in the financial statements of each entity are measured using that functional currency.
• Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates
prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the
settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income.
Non-monetary financial assets and liabilities that are carried at historic cost are translated using the
exchange rate as at the date of initial transactions and are not re-measured. Translation differences
on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities, such as equities held at fair value through profit or
loss, are recognised in profit or loss as part of the fair value gain or loss.
• Group companies
The results and financial position of all group entities, none of which has the currency of a
hyperinflationary economy, that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency
are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
(I)
assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position are translated at the closing rate
at the date of that statement of financial position;
23
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
(II)
income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average
exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect
of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are
translated at the date of the transaction); and
(III)
all resulting exchange differences are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
as other comprehensive income.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets
and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate.
(d) Financial assets
The Group classifies its financial assets, at initial recognition, into one of the following categories:
investments at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables and other financial assets
depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired. The Group’s accounting policy for each
category is as follows:
• Investments at fair value through profit or loss
The investments at fair value through profit or loss are designated by the board of directors at fair
value through profit or loss at inception. These include debt and equity securities, convertible credit
agreements and derivatives, on the basis that they are part of a group of financial assets which are
managed and have their performance evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the risk
management and investment strategies of the Group.
Recognition/Derecognition:
Acquisitions and disposals of investments are recognised on the trade date on which the Group
received acquisitions of investments or delivered disposals of investments. Investment fair value
through profit or loss is derecognised when the Group loses control over the contractual rights that
comprise that asset. This occurs when the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired or
the Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation
to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’
arrangement; and either (a) the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the
asset, or (b) the Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of
the asset, but has transferred control of the asset. When the Group commits to sell an asset,
Investments at fair value through the profit or loss are derecognised and corresponding receivables
from the buyer for the payment are recognised as of that date.
Measurement:
Investment at fair value through the profit or loss is initially recognised at fair value. Transaction costs
are expensed into the profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, all financial assets and financial
liabilities are measured at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the
financial assets held at fair value through profit or loss are presented in the profit or loss in the period
in which they arise.
24
Fair value estimation:
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded securities) is
based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial
assets held by the Group is the current bid price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not
traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques in accordance with the
Guidelines. Pursuant to the Guidelines, the Group believes the following techniques applied
individually, or in combination, are the most suitable ones for the Group’s current portfolios:
(I)
Multiples: When valuing investments on a multiple basis, the Group has abided by the following
principles:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
apply a multiple that is appropriate and reasonable (giving the risk profile and earnings
growth prospects of the underlying company) to the maintainable earnings of the
underlying company;
adjust the amount derived in (i) above for surplus assets or excess liabilities and other
relevant factors to derive the enterprise value for the underlying company;
deduct from the enterprise value all amounts relating to financial instruments ranking
ahead of the highest ranking instrument of the Group in a liquidation and taking into
account the effect of any instrument that may dilute the Group’s investments in order to
derive the gross attributable enterprise value;
apply an appropriate marketability discount to the gross attributable enterprise value
derived in (iii) above in order to derive the net attributable enterprise value. The
marketability discount relates to an investment rather than to the underlying business.
Marketability discounts will vary from situation to situation and is a question of judgement.
When a discount is applied, relevant factors in determining the appropriate marketability
discount in each particular situation will be considered. A discount in the range of 20% to
30% (in steps of 5%) is generally used in practice, depending upon the particular
circumstances; and
v.
apportion the net attributable enterprise value appropriately between the relevant
financial instruments.
(II)
(III)
Discounted cash flow: Fair value is estimated by deriving the present value of the investment
using reasonable assumptions of expected future cash flows of the underlying business and the
terminal value and date, and the appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate that quantifies the risk
inherent to the investment. The discount rate is estimated with reference to the market risk-free
rate, a risk adjusted premium and information specific to the investment or market sector.
Industry valuation benchmarks: The use of industry benchmarks is only likely to be appropriate
as the main basis of estimating fair value in limited situations, and is more likely to be useful as a
sense check of values produced using other methodologies. The Group has primarily relied on
such metrics to validate the outcome produced by other valuation techniques.
• Loans and receivables
These assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not
quoted on an active market. Income from loans and receivables is recognised as it accrues by
reference to the principal outstanding and the effective interest rate applicable, which is the rate
that exactly discounts the estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial asset
to the asset’s carrying value. The losses arising from impairment are recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income.
25
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
This category generally applies to trade and other receivables. For more information on receivables,
refer to Note 16.
• Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments are held at fair value and changes in fair value are recognised in
profit or loss of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
• Impairment of financial assets
For amortised cost loans and receivables, the Group assesses, at each reporting date, whether there
is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. An impairment
exists if one or more events that have occurred since the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred
‘loss event’), have an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group
of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Evidence of impairment may include indications
that the debtor is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or
principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation
and observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash
flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults.
(e) Financial liabilities
The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables, borrowing and financial guarantee
contracts.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings
and payables, net of directly attributable transaction costs.
The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as described below:
• Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Financial liabilities (including trade and other payables and borrowing) are subsequently measured
at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and
of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that
exactly discounts estimated future cash payments (including all fees and points paid or received that
form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts)
through the expected life of the financial liability, or where appropriate a shorter period, to the net
carrying amount on initial recognition.
• Financial guarantee contracts
Financial guarantee contracts issued by the Group are those contracts that require a payment to
be made to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because the specified debtor fails to make a
payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument. Financial guarantee contracts
are recognised initially as a liability at fair value, adjusted for transaction costs that are directly
attributable to the issuance of the guarantee. Subsequently, the liability is measured at the higher of
the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date
and the amount recognised less cumulative amortisation.
26
• Redeemable zero dividend preference shares
On initial recognition, redeemable zero dividend preference shares are recognised at the fair value,
which are determined using the prevailing market interest of similar non-convertible debts, net of issue
costs incurred. In subsequent periods, redeemable zero dividend preference shares are carried at
amortised cost using the effective interest method.
• Derecognition
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled,
or expires.
(f) Equity instrument
Financial instruments shall reclassify a financial liability as equity from the date when there is no
existence of a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial assets by the issuer. The
equity instruments are recorded at the fair value of the equity instruments issued. The difference
between the carrying amount of the financial liability extinguished and the fair value of the equity
instruments issued shall be recognised in profit or loss. The equity instruments issued shall be recognised
initially and measured at the date the financial liability is extinguished.
(g) Cash and bank and borrowings
Cash and bank is defined as cash in hand, demand deposits, time deposit and short-term, highly
liquid investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash. They are subject to an
insignificant risk of changes in value, and have a short maturity, generally less than three months, less
bank overdrafts which are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash
management. For the purpose of the consolidated statement of financial position, cash and bank
balances comprise cash on hand and at banks, including term deposits, which are not restricted as
to use.
Borrowings are financial liabilities at amortised cost and are initially measured at fair value, net of
directly attributable costs incurred. It is subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective
interest method. The related interest expense is recognised in profit or loss.
(h) Share-based payments
Employees (including senior executives) of the Group receive remuneration in the form of share-based
payment transactions (i.e. share options), whereby employees render services as consideration for
equity instruments (“equity-settled transactions”). Certain director, executives and key employees of
the Group are granted share appreciation rights (including upper share rights and contingent share
awards), which can only be settled in cash (“cash-settled transactions”). Advisors receive equity-
settled options in relation to the Company’s admission to trading on the AIM of the London Stock
Exchange.
The cost of these options with employees are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity
instruments awarded at the date of grant, whereas those with non-employees are measured at the fair
value of goods or services received at the date when the goods or services have been received. The
fair value is determined by using binominal tree model, further details of which are given in Note 27.
27
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
Equity-settled transactions
The cost of equity-settled transactions (share options) is recognised, together with a corresponding
increase in equity, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled,
ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (the “vesting
date”). The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date
until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Group’s best
estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. Movements in the liability
(other than cash payments) are recognised in profit or loss.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is
conditional upon a market or non-vesting condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of
whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance and/or service
conditions are satisfied.
The dilutive effect of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation
of earnings per share.
Cash-settled transactions
The cost of cash-settled transactions (upper share rights and contingent share awards) is measured
initially at fair value at the grant date using binominal tree model, further details of which are given
in Note 27. This fair value is expensed over the period until the vesting date with recognition of a
corresponding liability. The liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date up to and
including the settlement date, with changes in fair value recognised in expense.
(i) Taxes
Current Income Tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount
expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used
to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Current income tax relating to items recognised directly in equity is recognised in equity and not in
the statement of comprehensive income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the
tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation
and establishes provisions where appropriate.
Deferred Tax
Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting
purposes.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences, except:
where the deferred tax liability arises from goodwill or the initial recognition of an asset or liability
in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects
neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and
associates where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and
it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
(I)
(II)
28
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused
tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available
against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and
unused tax losses can be utilised, except:
(I)
(II)
where the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the
initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and,
at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss;
and
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and
associates, deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that the
temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available
against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of
the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each
reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable
profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the
period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have
been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off
current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable
entity and the same taxation authority.
Income taxes are recognised in the profit or loss or directly in equity except when a tax exemption
has been granted.
(j) Performance incentive payable
Performance incentive payable is only accrued on those investments (classified as investments at fair
value through profit or loss and loans) in which the investment’s performance conditions, measured
at the end of each reporting period, would be achieved if those investments were realised at fair
value. Fair value is determined using the Group’s valuation methodology and is measured at the end
of each reporting period.
Any changes in the performance incentive provision will be reflected in the line item of performance
fee in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in which the expense establishing the
provision was originally recorded.
29
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
(k) Investment income/loss
Investment income/loss derived from the investment activities is equivalent to “revenue” for the
purposes of IAS 1. Investment income/loss is analysed into the following components:
•
•
•
Realised gains/losses on the disposal of investments are the difference between the fair value
of the consideration received less any directly attributable costs, on the sale of equity and the
repayment of loans and receivables, and its carrying value at the start of the accounting
period.
Unrealised gains/losses on the revaluation of investments are the movement in the carrying
value of investments measured at fair value between the start and end of the accounting
period and the impairment of amortised cost loans.
Income/loss from loans is recognised on a time proportion basis as it accrues by reference to
the principal outstanding and the effective interest rate applicable.
(l) Provisions and contingent liabilities
Provisions are recognised for liabilities of uncertain timing or amount when the Group has a legal or
constructive obligation arising as a result of a past event, which will probably result in an outflow of
economic benefits that can be reasonably estimated.
Where it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required, or the amount cannot
be estimated reliably, the obligation is disclosed as a contingent liability, unless the probability of an
outflow of economic benefits is remote. Possible obligations, the existence of which will only be
confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events, are also disclosed as
contingent liabilities unless the probability of an outflow of economic benefits is remote.
(m) New and revised IFRS that are effective or early adopted in 2017
The following new and revised IFRSs have been applied by the Group in the current year and have
affected the presentation and disclosures set out in these consolidated financial statements.
IFRSs (Amendments)
Amendments to IAS 7
Amendments to IAS 12
Annual Improvements 2014–2016 Cycle
Disclosure Initiative
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealised Losses
The application of the above new and revised IFRSs in the current year had no material impact on
the Group’s financial performance and financial position for the current and prior years and/or on
the disclosures set out in these consolidated financial statements.
Amendments to IAS 7 – Disclosure Initiative
The amendments introduce an additional disclosure that will enable users of financial statements to
evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities.
The adoption of the amendments has led to the additional disclosure presented in the note to the
consolidated statement of cash flows, note 25.
30
(n) Standards issued but not yet effective
Standards issued but not yet effective up to the date of issuance of the Group’s consolidated financial
statements are listed below. This listing is of standards, amendments and interpretations issued that
the Group reasonably expects to be have an impact on disclosures, financial position or performance
when applied at a future date.
Amendments to IFRSs
Amendments to IFRSs
IFRS 9
IFRS 15
IFRS 16
IFRS 17
Amendments to IFRS 2
Amendments to IFRS 4
Amendments to IFRS 15
Amendments to IAS 40
IFRIC 22
IFRIC 23
Annual Improvements 2014-2016 Cycle1
Annual Improvements 2015-2017 Cycle 2*
Financial instruments1
Revenue from Contracts with Customers1
Leases2
Insurance Contracts3*
Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment
Transactions1*
Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance
Contracts1
Revenue From Contracts with Customers (Clarification to IFRS 15)1
Transfer of Investment Property1
Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration1
Uncertainty over income tax treatment2*
1 Effective in the EU for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018
2 Effective in the EU for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019
3 Effective in the EU for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021
* Not yet endorsed by the European Union
Except for the new and amendments to IFRSs and interpretation mentioned below, the directors
anticipate that the application of all other new and amendments to IFRSs will have no material impact
on the consolidated financial statements in the foreseeable future.
IFRS 9 “Financial instruments”
IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, financial
liabilities and impairment requirements for financial assets. A preliminary assessment of IFRS 9
performed by the Group, which is subject to changes arising from a more detailed ongoing analysis,
is as follows:
(a) Classification and measurement
The Group’s debt securities currently classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or
loss (“FVTPL”) will not be significantly affected in respect of the accounting treatment, upon
adoption of IFRS 9.
The Group’s equity securities currently classified as financial assets at FVTPL will continue to be
classified under this category. The measurement requirements for financial assets at FVTPL under
IFRS 9 are largely unchanged.
(b)
Impairment
IFRS 9 requires an impairment on debt instruments recorded at amortised cost or at fair value
through other comprehensive income, lease receivables, loan commitments and financial
guarantee contracts that are not accounted for at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9,
to be recorded based on an expected credit loss model either on a twelve-month basis or a
lifetime basis. The Group will apply the simplified approach and record lifetime expected losses
that are estimated based on the present values of all cash shortfalls over the remaining life of
all of its trade receivables. Furthermore, the Group will apply the general approach and record
twelve-month expected credit losses that are estimated based on the possible default events
31
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
on its other receivables within the next twelve months. The Group does not expect the adoption
of IFRS 9 will have a significant impact on the impairment of its financial instruments.
IFRS 15 “Revenue from contracts with customers”
In 2016, the IASB issued classifications to IFRS15 in relation to the identification of performance
obligations, principal versus agent considerations as well as licensing application guidance.
The directors anticipate that the application of IFRS 15 in the future may result in more disclosures.
However, the directors do not anticipate that the application of IFRS 15 will have a material impact
on the timing and amounts of revenue recognised in the respective reporting periods.
1.5 Change in accounting estimate
During the year ended 31 December 2017, the Group has reassessed the fair value of certain
investments measured at fair value through profit or loss. China Rice Ltd (“China Rice”), Unipower
Battery Ltd (“Unipower”) and Moly World Ltd were remeasured by using expected recoverable
method and Kincora Copper Ltd (“Kincora”) by using consensus pricing method to better reflect the
expected fair value of the investments. Such change in accounting estimate has been applied
prospectively from 1 January 2017 onwards. As a result, unrealised losses on investments for the year
ended 31 December 2017 and the carrying of investment as at 31 December 2017 has increased
and decreased by approximately US$52,431,000 respectively.
2. Investment loss
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Realised gains/(losses) on disposal of investments 423 (142)
– Investments at FVTPL 882 (269)
– Loans at FVTPL – 127
– Subsidiary (459) –
Unrealised losses on investments (74,440) (6,069)
– Investments at FVTPL (50,526) (6,059)
– Loans at FVTPL (23,761) –
– Loans at amortised cost (153) (10)
Income from loans – 627
–––––––– ––––––––
Total (74,017) (5,584)
–––––––– ––––––––
3. Consulting services payable
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Consulting services payable (1,390) (1,769)
–––––––– ––––––––
Total (1,390) (1,769)
–––––––– ––––––––
32
4. Performance incentive
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Release of provision for performance incentive payable over one year – 4,195
–––––––– ––––––––
Total – 4,195
–––––––– ––––––––
A provision within the consolidated statement of financial position for future performance incentive
for the year ended 31 December 2017 was US$Nil (2016: US$Nil). The performance incentives are
accrued and payable to Origo Advisors Ltd. Refer to Note 28 for details on Origo Advisors Ltd. The
release of provision in 2016 was derived from the amendment agreement of Asset Realisation Support
Agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) signed between the Group and Origo Advisors Ltd. on
6 September 2016.
5. Other administrative expenses
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Employee expenses (154) (161)
Professional fees (648) (1,769)
Audit fees (120) (139)
– Current year (120) (158)
– Over-provision in respect of prior years – 19
Depreciation expenses (13) (24)
Amortisation expenses (1) (2)
Provision for bad debts (3,386) (1,008)
Others (534) (515)
–––––––– ––––––––
Total (4,856) (3,618)
–––––––– ––––––––
6. Information regarding directors and employees
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
The aggregate payroll costs of these employees were as follows:
Wages and salaries (154) (161)
Share-based payments (9) (67)
–––––––– ––––––––
(163) (228)
–––––––– ––––––––
* Most employees of the Group have been transferred to and employed by Origo Advisors Ltd. in January 2015, which
is controlled by entities whose ultimate beneficiaries include Niklas Ponnert (director of the Company who resigned in
April 2018) and Chris A Rynning (former director of the Company).
33
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
7. Directors’ remuneration
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Directors’ emoluments (152) (153)
Share-based payment expenses (9) (33)
–––––––– ––––––––
(161) (186)
–––––––– ––––––––
Directors’ remuneration for the year 2017 and the number of options held were as follows:
Director Share-based 2017
Salaries* fee payment** Total Number
Name US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 of options
Mr. Niklas Ponnert*** – – 9 9 4,500,000
Mr. Lionel de Saint-Exupery*** – 59 – 59 –
Ms. Shonaid Jemmett Page*** – 59 – 59 –
Mr. Hiroshi Funaki*** – 16 – 16 –
Mr. Philip Peter Scales*** – 9 – 9 –
Mr. John Chapman*** – 9 – 9 –
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
– 152 9 161 4,500,000
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Directors’ remuneration for the year 2016 and the number of options held were as follows:
Director Share-based 2016
Salaries* fee payment** Total Number
Name US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 of options
Mr. Niklas Ponnert – – 33 33 4,500,000
Mr. Lionel de Saint-Exupery – 78 – 78 –
Ms. Shonaid Jemmett Page – 75 – 75 –
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
– 153 33 186 4,500,000
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
*
Short term employee benefits.
** Share-based payment refers to expenses arising from the Company’s share option scheme (Note 27).
*** Mr. Lionel de Saint-Exupery and Ms. Shonaid Jemmett Page resigned as non-executive directors of the Company
in October 2017. Mr. Hiroshi Funaki was appointed as director of the Company in September 2017, and Mr. Philip
Peter Scales and Mr. John Chapman were appointed as directors of the Company in October 2017. Mr. Niklas
Ponnert resigned as executive director of the Company in April 2018.
8. Operating segment information
Operating segments are components of the entity whose results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s
chief operating decision-maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment
and to assess its performance. The chief operating decision-maker of the Group is considered to be
the board of directors. The Group’s operating segments have been defined based on the types of
investments which was equity investment and debt instrument in 2017 and 2016.
34
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Equity Debt Total Equity Debt Total Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Unlisted
Listed
Investment loss:
Realised (losses)/gains on disposal of
investments (481) – (481) 904 – 904 423
Unrealised losses on investments (44,986) (23,914) (68,900) (5,540) – (5,540) (74,440)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total (45,467) (23,914) (69,381) (4,636) – (4,636) (74,017)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Provision for bad debts (3,386) – (3,386) – – – (3,386)
Unallocated interest expense (3,598)
Unallocated depreciation and
amortisation expenses (14)
Unallocated corporate expenses (2,788)
––––––––
Loss before tax (83,803)
Income tax credit 819 – 819 – – – 819
––––––––
Loss for the year (82,984)
––––––––
Net divestment
Net proceeds of divestment 1,000 – 1,000 3,954 – 3,954 4,954
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Statement of financial position
Investment portfolio 6,850 734 7,584 10,195 – 10,195 17,779
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
The Group’s geographical areas based on the location of investment assets, are defined primarily as
China, Mongolia, South Africa and Europe, as presented in the following table.
South
Europe China Mongolia Africa Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Investment loss:
Realised gains/(losses) on
disposal of investments – 437 (14) – 423
Unrealised losses on
investments (335) (65,338) (8,798) 31 (74,440)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total (335) (64,901) (8,812) 31 (74,017)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Provision for bad debts – (3,386) – – (3,386)
Unallocated interest expenses (3,598)
Unallocated depreciation
and amortisation expenses (14)
Unallocated corporate
expenses (2,788)
––––––––
Loss before tax (83,803)
Income tax credit – 819 – – 819
––––––––
Loss for the year (82,984)
––––––––
Net divestment
Net proceeds of divestment – 4,918 36 – 4,954
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Statement of financial position
Investment portfolio 867 14,097 2,653 162 17,779
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
35
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
For the year ended 31 December 2016
Equity Debt Total Equity Debt Total Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
(Restated) (Restated) (Restated) (Restated)
Unlisted
Listed
Investment loss:
Realised (losses)/gains on
disposal of investments (440) – (440) 171 127 298 (142)
Unrealised (losses)/gains on
investments (8,337) (10) (8,347) 2,278 – 2,278 (6,069)
Income from loans – 542 542 – 85 85 627
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total (8,777) 532 (8,245) 2,449 212 2,661 (5,584)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Unallocated interest expenses (5,791)
Unallocated depreciation and
amortisation expenses (26)
Unallocated corporate expenses (921)
––––––––
Loss before tax (12,322)
Income tax credit 65 – 65 – – – 65
––––––––
Loss for the year (12,257)
––––––––
Net divestment
Net proceeds of divestment 353 – 353 412 383 795 1,148
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Statement of financial position
Investment portfolio 52,835 24,640 77,475 19,188 – 19,188 96,663
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
South
Europe China Mongolia Africa Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Investment loss:
Realised (losses)/gains on
disposal of investments – (440) 298 – (142)
Unrealised gains/(losses)
on investments 102 (2,833) (3,255) (83) (6,069)
Income from loans – 542 85 – 627
––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– –––––––––
Total 102 (2,731) (2,872) (83) (5,584)
––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– –––––––––
Unallocated interest expenses (5,791)
Unallocated depreciation and
amortisation expenses (26)
Unallocated corporate expenses (921)
–––––––––
Loss before tax (12,322)
Income tax credit – 65 – – 65
–––––––––
Loss for the year (12,257)
–––––––––
Net divestment/(investment)
Net proceeds of divestment – 353 795 – 1,148
––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– –––––––––
Statement of financial position
Investment portfolio 1,202 83,840 11,490 131 96,663
––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– –––––––––
36
9. Finance costs
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Interest expenses of redeemable/convertible zero dividend
preference shares (3,219) (5,773)
Interest expenses of borrowing (335) –
Bank charges (44) (18)
–––––––– ––––––––
(3,598) (5,791)
–––––––– ––––––––
10. Income tax
As the Company is not in receipt of income from Manx land, certain related business or property and
does not hold a Manx banking licence, it is taxed at the standard rate of 0% on the Isle of Man. The
Company is resident for tax purposes in the Isle of Man and subject to corporate income tax at
the standard rate of 0% and as such no provision for tax in the Isle of Man has been made.
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Current tax
Current year – –
Deferred tax
Deferred income tax* 819 65
–––––––– ––––––––
Total income tax credit in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income 819 65
–––––––– ––––––––
* As at 31 December 2017, the deferred income tax liability US$ 796,000 (2016: US$2,017,000) relates to fair value gain
of Niutech Environment Technology Corporation (“Niutech”) (2016: Celadon Mining Ltd., China Rice, Niutech and
Unipower), estimated in accordance with the relevant tax laws and regulations in the People’s Republic of China
(“PRC”) based on a tax rate of 10%.
The income tax for the year can be reconciled per the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income as follows:
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Loss before tax (83,803) (12,322)
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss before tax multiplied by rate of corporate income tax in the Isle
of Man of 0% (2016: 0%) – –
Effects of:
Deferred tax on unrealised gains on investments 819 65
–––––––– ––––––––
Total income tax credit in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income 819 65
–––––––– ––––––––
37
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
Deferred income tax
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Opening deferred income tax liability
Income in accounts taxable in the future 2,017 2,082
–––––––– ––––––––
2,017 2,082
–––––––– ––––––––
Recognised through consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Income in accounts taxable in the future (819) (65)
Realised through investment realisation (402) –
–––––––– ––––––––
(1,221) (65)
–––––––– ––––––––
Closing deferred income tax liability
Income in accounts taxable in the future 796 2,017
–––––––– ––––––––
796 2,017
–––––––– ––––––––
No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of certain unused tax losses of US$ 236,000
(2016: US$ 153,000), for offsetting against future taxable profits of the relevant entity in the Group in
which the losses arose, due to the unpredictability of future profit streams. The unused tax losses will
expire within a maximum period of five years in the PRC.
11. Loss per share (“LPS”)
2017 2016
Numerator US$’000 US$’000
Loss for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent
as used in the calculation of basic loss per share (41,071) (12,244)
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss for the year attributable to redeemable zero dividend preference
shareholders of the parent as used in the calculation of basic
loss per share (41,913) N/A
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent
as used in the calculation of diluted loss per share (41,071) (12,244)
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss for the year attributable to redeemable zero dividend preference
shareholders of the parent as used in the calculation of diluted
loss per share (41,913) N/A
–––––––– ––––––––
38
2017 2016
Number of Number of
Denominator Shares shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic LPS 351,035,389 351,035,389
––––––––––––– –––––––––––
Effect of dilution*:
Share options – –
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for the
effect of dilution 351,035,389 351,035,389
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Weighted average number of redeemable zero dividend
preference shares for basic LPS before and after adjusted
for the effect of dilution 14,991,781 –
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Basic LPS of ordinary shares (11.70) cents (3.49) cents
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Diluted LPS of ordinary shares (11.70) cents (3.49) cents
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Basic LPS of redeemable zero dividend preference shares (279.57) cents N/A
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
Diluted LPS of redeemable zero dividend preference shares (279.57) cents N/A
––––––––––––– –––––––––––––
* Diluted loss per share for the years ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016 is the same as the basic loss per
share, as the Company’s outstanding share options and convertible zero dividend preference shares had an anti-
dilutive effect on the basic loss per share for the years ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016.
12. Property, plant and equipment
Cost
At 1 January 2016
Disposal
At 31 December 2016 and 2017
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 January 2016
Charge for the year 2016
Disposal
At 31 December 2016
Charge for the year 2017
At 31 December 2017
Net book value
At 31 December 2016
At 31 December 2017
Vehicles
US$’000
144
––––––––
(59)
––––––––
85
––––––––
80
––––––––
24
––––––––
(52)
––––––––
52
––––––––
13
––––––––
65
––––––––
33
––––––––
20
––––––––
39
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
13. Investments in subsidiaries
The principal subsidiaries of the Group are as follows:
Proportion of Proportion of
ownership ownership
interest at interest at
Country of 31 December 31 December
Name incorporation 2017 2016
Ascend Ventures Ltd Malaysia 100% 100%
Origo Resource Partners Ltd Guernsey 100% 100%
PHI International Holding Ltd Bermuda 100% 100%
PHI International (Bermuda) Holding Ltd* Bermuda 100% 100%
Ascend (Beijing) Consulting Ltd** China 100% 100%
China Cleantech Partners, L.P. (“CCP Fund”) Cayman Islands 100% 100%
ISAK International Holding Ltd*** British Virgin Islands – 71.2%
* Owned by Origo Resource Partners Ltd
** Owned by Ascend Ventures Ltd
***Struck off
14. Investments at fair value through profit or loss
As at 31 December 2017
Fair value Proportion
Country of hierarchy of ownership Cost Fair value
Name incorporation level interest US$’000 US$’000
Niutech (Note b) British Virgin Islands 3 11.8% 4,819 8,555
Celadon Mining Ltd British Virgin Islands 3 8.9% 13,069 4,477
Kincora (Notes c and d) Canada 3 30.9% 8,571 1,607
Six Waves Inc British Virgin Islands 3 1.1% 240 1,065
Gobi Coal & Energy Ltd
(Note c and e) British Virgin Islands 3 7.5% 14,960 1,013
Marula Mines Ltd South Africa 3 0.9% 250 162
Fram Exploration AS Norway 3 0.6% 1,223 133
Staur Aqua AS Norway 3 9.2% 719 –
Unipower (Note d) Cayman Islands 3 16.5% 4,301 –
China Rice (Note d) British Virgin Islands 3 32.1% 13,000 –
Moly World Ltd (Note d) British Virgin Islands 3 20.0% 10,000 –
Other quoted
investments (Note c) 1 593 33
–––––––––
17,045
–––––––––
The shares held in China Rice and Unipower are all convertible preference shares whilst the remaining
investments held in the other entities are all ordinary equity shares. The ‘proportion of ownership
interest’ represents the percentage of the shares held by the Group in all share classes.
40
As at 31 December 2016
Fair value Proportion
Country of hierarchy of ownership Cost Fair value
Name incorporation level interest US$’000 US$’000
Niutech (Note b) British Virgin Islands 3 18.4% 6,350 14,160
Celadon Mining Ltd British Virgin Islands 3 8.9% 13,069 20,059
Kincora (Notes c and d) Canada 1 30.9% 8,571 4,957
Six Waves Inc British Virgin Islands 3 1.1% 240 1,464
Gobi Coal & Energy Ltd
(Note c and e) British Virgin Islands 3 10.8% 14,960 2,679
Marula Mines Ltd South Africa 3 0.9% 250 131
Fram Exploration AS Norway 3 0.6% 1,223 145
Staur Aqua AS Norway 3 9.2% 719 562
Unipower (Note d) Cayman Islands 3 16.5% 4,301 6,648
China Rice (Note d) British Virgin Islands 3 32.1% 13,000 16,364
Moly World Ltd (Note d) British Virgin Islands 3 20.0% 10,000 3,783
Rising Technology
Corporation Ltd/Beijing
Rising Information
Technology Ltd (Note f) British Virgin Islands 3 2%/1.6% 5,565 1,000
Other quoted
investments (Note c) 1 685 71
–––––––––
72,023
–––––––––
Notes
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
There are no significant restrictions that will have an impact on ability to transfer these investments.
The Company holds 95.3% interest in Niutech Energy Ltd, by which Niutech is indirectly held.
Investments held partially by China Commodities Absolute Return Ltd, one of the subsidiaries of the Group, in
2015. During the year 2016, the investments had been transferred and held by the Company.
These investments are associates of the Group measured at fair value through profit or loss.
During the course of 2017, certain licenses of Gobi Coal & Energy Ltd were subject to freezing and confiscation
orders imposed by Mongolian courts in relation to a dispute between the former chairman of the company and
one if its shareholders. As of 31 December 2017 these orders were still in effect.
2% equity stake in Rising Technology Corporation Ltd and 1.6% beneficial interest in Beijing Rising Information
Technology Ltd, a company incorporated in the PRC, under a nominee agreement. The investment was
disposed in during the year.
In accordance with IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement”, investments recognised at fair value are
required to be analysed between those whose fair value is based on:
a)
b)
c)
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);
Those involving inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) (Level 2); and
Those with inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data
(unobservable inputs) (Level 3).
For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis, the Group determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by
re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. In 2017, the Group transferred an
41
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
investment with fair value of approximately US$1,607,000 as at 31 December 2017 from Level 1 to
Level 3, primarily related to an equity security traded in active markets while there have been no
transfers between levels during the year of 2016. The Group has used a quoted offered price of
Kincora from a market pricing service agent in 2017 (2016: quoted price in active market) due to lack
of liquidity from reduced daily transaction volume during the year in the active market.
The following table provides an analysis of investments carried at fair value by level of fair value hierarchy:
2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Investments at fair value through profit or loss
– Listed equity investments 33 – 10,162 10,195
– Unlisted equity investments – – 6,850 6,850
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
33 – 17,012 17,045
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
2016
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Investments at fair value through profit or loss
– Listed equity investments 5,028 – 14,160 19,188
– Unlisted equity investments – – 52,835 52,835
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
5,028 – 66,995 72,023
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
(Restated)
Changes in investments at fair value through profit or loss based on Level 3:
Opening balance
Proceeds from disposals of investments
Realised gain/(losses) on disposals of investments
Bank charges
Transaction costs
Transfer from Level 1
Net exchange difference
Movement in unrealised losses on investments
– In profit or loss
Closing balance
2017
US$’000
66,995
(4,918)
918
(11)
(402)
1,607
1,832
(49,009)
––––––––
17,012
––––––––
2016
US$’000
76,125
(353)
(440)
–
–
–
(4,657)
(3,680)
––––––––
66,995
––––––––
fair value decrease on
The
(2016: US$8,337,000) was recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
investments categorised within Level 3 of US$47,177,000
42
Description of significant unobservable inputs to valuation:
As at 31 December 2017
Valuation
technique
Consensus pricing
method
Multiples method
Significant
unobservable
inputs
Offered quote
Range
USD 1,607,000
Discount for lack
of marketability
20% – 30%
Share price volatility
80%
Consensus pricing
method
Multiples method
Offered quote
USD 162,000
Discount for lack
of marketability
30%
Investments in quoted equity
shares – Kincora
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Celadon Mining Ltd, Gobi
Coal & Energy Ltd and Fram
Exploration AS
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Marula Mines Ltd
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Six Waves Inc
As at 31 December 2016
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Moly World Ltd
Valuation
technique
Discounted cash flow
method
Investments in unquoted equity
shares - others in Mining Investments*
Multiples method
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – China Investments*
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Staur Aqua AS
Investments in unquoted equity
shares – Six Waves Inc
Multiples method
Multiples method
Multiples method
* Investments disclosed in the Origo’s Portfolio in Chairman’s Letter.
Significant
unobservable
inputs
Weighted average
cost of capital
(“WACC”)
Discount for lack of
marketability
Discount for lack of
marketability
Discount for lack of
marketability
Discount for lack of
marketability
Discount for lack of
marketability
Range
23%
20% – 30%
20%– 30%
30%
30%
30%
43
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
Risk management activities
Fair value risk
The Group’s financial assets are predominantly investments in unquoted companies, and the fair
value of each investment depends upon a combination of market factors and the performance of
the underlying asset. The Group does not hedge the market risk inherent in the portfolio but manages
asset performance risk on an asset-specific basis by continuously monitoring each asset’s
performance. Changes of each asset’s fair value is taken to the statement of comprehensive income
as necessary. The Group believes that the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair
value for their financial assets and liabilities.
Valuation techniques
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded securities) is
based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial
assets held by the Group is the current closing price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using
valuation techniques. The Group has estimated the value of each of its unquoted equity instruments
by using judgement to select the most appropriate valuation methodology for each investment
based on the recommendations of the Guidelines. Valuation methodologies mainly include multiples,
discounted cash flow, industry valuation benchmarks, available market prices and so on, which may
apply individually or in combination. Key assumptions and judgements of each methodology
concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty will have a significant risk of
causing a material adjustment to the fair value of the instruments within the next reporting period.
Sensitivity risk of investments at fair value through profit or loss based at Level 3
Level 3 inputs are sensitive to assumptions made when ascertaining fair value of financial assets.
A reasonable alternative assumption would be to apply a standard marketability discount of 25% for
all assets rather than the specific approach adopted. This would have a negative impact on the
portfolio of US$180,000 (2016: increased US$2,442,000) or 1.17% (2016: increased 3.70%) of total
investments at fair value through profit or loss based at level 3.
Increase in WACC by 1% would decrease/increase the fair value by nil (2016: US$282,000).
15. Loans
The Group has entered into convertible credit agreements and has the right to convert the outstanding
principal balance of relevant loans into borrower’s shares according to certain conversion conditions,
and loan agreements with certain investee companies as set forth in the table below.
As at 31 December 2017
Loans Loans
Loan Loan due within due after
rates principal one year one year Fair value
Borrower % US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Convertible credit agreements*
Staur Aqua AS 0-15 3,848 384 350 734
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
384 350 734
–––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
* Loans in relation to convertible credit agreements are measured at fair value. Loans in relation to loan agreements
are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method less any identified impairment losses.
44
As at 31 December 2016
Loans Loans
Loan Loan due within due after
rates principal one year one year Fair value
Borrower % US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Convertible credit agreements*
China Rice 4 15,000 15,000 – 15,000
Unipower 6 9,000 9,000 – 9,000
Staur Aqua AS 0-15 3,848 145 350 495
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Sub-total 24,145 350 24,495
–––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Loan agreements*
Unipower 12 164 145 – 145
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Sub-total 145 – 145
–––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 24,290 350 24,640
–––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Statement of changes in loans:
Opening balance
Repayment
Converted into ordinary shares
Net exchange difference
Movement in realised and unrealised losses on investments
– In profit or loss
Closing balance
Changes in convertible credit agreements based on Level 3:
Opening balance
Repayment
Converted into ordinary shares
Net exchange difference
Movement in realised and unrealised losses on investments
– In profit or loss
Closing balance
2017
US$’000
24,640
–
–
8
(23,914)
––––––––
734
––––––––
2017
US$’000
24,495
–
–
–
(23,761)
––––––––
734
––––––––
2016
US$’000
26,443
(383)
(1,532)
(5)
117
––––––––
24,640
––––––––
2016
US$’000
26,288
(383)
(1,532)
(5)
127
––––––––
24,495
––––––––
The fair value decrease on convertible credit agreements categorised within Level 3 of
US$23,914,000(2016: increase of US$117,000) was recorded in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income.
Convertible loans issued to China Rice of US$15,000,000 and Unipower of US$9,000,000 were fully
impaired in 2017.
45
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
16. Trade and other receivables
Trade debtors
Other debtors
Loan interest receivables
Prepayment
Total
2017 Aging for the Group
2017
US$’000
278
596
–
7
––––––––
881
––––––––
2016
US$’000
5
889
3,113
–
––––––––
4,007
––––––––
0-30 31-60 61-90 91-180 181- 365 Over
days days days days days 365 days Total
Aging for the Group US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Trade debtors 278 – – – – – 278
Other debtors and prepayment 51 17 1 16 113 1,925 2,123
Loan interest receivables – – – – – 8,161 8,161
Provision against loan interest
receivables – – – – – (8,161) (8,161)
Provision of bad debts – – – – – (1,520) (1,520)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 329 17 1 16 113 405 881
Percentage 37% 2% 0% 2% 13% 46% 100%
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
2016 Aging for the Group
0-30 31-60 61-90 91-180 181-365 Over
days days days days days 365 days Total
Aging for the Group US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Trade debtors – – – – – 5 5
Other debtors 19 240 2 10 14 2,941 3,226
Loan interest receivables 46 44 46 136 223 7,666 8,161
Provision against loan interest
receivables – – – – – (5,048) (5,048)
Provision of bad debts – – – – – (2,337) (2,337)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 65 284 48 146 237 3,227 4,007
Percentage 2% 7% 1% 4% 6% 80% 100%
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
The below table reconciles the impairment loss of trade debtors for the year:
At 1 January
Impairment loss recognised
Bad debts written off
Total
2017
US$’000
7,385
3,386
(1,090)
––––––––
9,681
––––––––
2016
US$’000
10,753
1,008
(4,376)
––––––––
7,385
––––––––
The Group identified an impairment of US$3,386,000 (2016: US$1,008,000) on trade and other
receivables, and the impairment is recognised within the other administrative expenses.
46
17. Cash and cash equivalents
Current account
Total cash and cash equivalents
18. Trade and other payables
Trade payables
Other payables
Performance incentive payable within one year
Total
19. Financial guarantee contracts
Financial guarantee contracts*
Total
2017
US$’000
1,199
––––––––
1,199
––––––––
2017
US$’000
–
1,381
–
––––––––
1,381
––––––––
2017
US$’000
435
––––––––
435
––––––––
2016
US$’000
1,786
––––––––
1,786
––––––––
2016
US$’000
5
3,467
8
––––––––
3,480
––––––––
2016
US$’000
435
––––––––
435
––––––––
* In July 2013, the Group entered into a guarantee agreement with IRCA Holdings Ltd and ABSA Bank Limited to
guarantee the repayment of loan facilities of up to Rand 6,769,000 extended by ABSA Bank Limited to IRCA Holdings
Ltd, which has applied for liquidation, so the Group recognised it as a liability. The payment request related to this
provision is expected at any time requested by ABSA Bank.
20. Short-term/Long-term borrowing
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowing*
Non-current liabilities
Long-term borrowing*
Total borrowing
2017
US$’000
2,500
–
––––––––
2,500
––––––––
2016
US$’000
–
2,500
––––––––
2,500
––––––––
* On 2 December 2016, the Company entered into an unsecured loan agreement with an independent third party for an
unsecured loan US$2,500,000 (the “Facility”). The Facility carries a rate of return (payable at repayment) of the higher of
12% per annum (calculated on a non-compounding basis) and US$1,250,000 (accrued on a day to day basis).
The proceeds of the Facility will be applied in accordance with article 13.1.1 of the Company’s articles
of association (“Articles”).
The Facility is repayable on the earlier of (i) 2 December 2020; and (ii) when the Company has
distributed US$6,000,000 to the Company’s shareholders in accordance with articles 4.10 to 4.12 of
the Company’s Articles provided it has sufficient funds to repay the Facility. The Company may at
any time prepay the Facility, in whole or in part, without penalty. As at 31 December 2017, no
distribution had been made in accordance with articles 4.10 to 4.12 of the Company’s Articles. The
Company expected to settle the borrowing in 2018, and thus, management reclassified the borrowing
as short-term borrowing as at 31 December 2017.
47
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
21. Provision
Upper share rights/contingent share awards*
Total
Opening balance
Movement in upper share rights/contingent share awards*
Movement in performance incentive provision**
Total
2017
US$’000
103
––––––––
103
––––––––
2017
US$’000
82
21
–
––––––––
103
––––––––
2016
US$’000
82
––––––––
82
––––––––
2016
US$’000
4,262
15
(4,195)
––––––––
82
––––––––
* The provision relates to the fair value of upper share rights and contingent share awards granted to certain directors,
executives and ex-employees under the Company’s joint share ownership scheme. Further details about the upper
share rights and contingent share awards are included in Note 27. The provision is expected to be utilised in the next
8 years provided the upper share rights are exercised.
**Refer to Note 4 for total performance incentive expenses. The provision is expected to be utilised when investments
are realised and the hurdle is reached.
22. Redeemable/convertible zero dividend preference shares
Balance at 1 January 2016
Interest expense on convertible zero
dividend preference shares
Interest expense on redeemable zero
dividend preference shares
Gain recognised upon extinguishment*
Change in fair value upon extinguishment
Released upon extinguishment
Recognition of redeemable zero
dividend preference shares
Balance at 31 December 2016
Interest expense on redeemable zero
dividend preference shares
Capitalisation of redeemable zero
dividend preference shares
Balance at 31 December 2017
Number of
shares
57,000,000
––––––––––
Liability
component
US$’000
69,385
––––––––
Equity
component
US$’000
8,297
––––––––
Other
reserve
US$’000
–
––––––––
4,674
–
–
–
–
–
–
––––––––––
57,000,000
––––––––––
1,099
(62)
–
(73,997)
46,370
––––––––
47,469
––––––––
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
27,627
(35,924)
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
3,219
–
–
–
––––––––––
57,000,000
––––––––––
(50,688)
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
50,688
––––––––
50,688
––––––––
* Gain recognised upon extinguishment was recognised in other income during the year 2016.
48
In September 2016, the Company restructured the terms of its existing convertible zero dividend
preference shares, where the conversion feature has been removed, which were revised as
redeemable zero dividend preference shares. The principal terms of restructure includes: i) removal
of redemption of at least 12 million convertible zero dividend preference shares and/or maturity date;
ii) reset of the accreted principal amount per preference shares to US$1.0526 each; iii) no rate of
return on the outstanding amount will begin to accrete until 1 January 2018 and, iv) in respect of
each preference share still in issue on 1 January 2018, its principal amount of US$1.0526 shall be subject
to the accretion of a rate of return equal to 4 per cent per annum from (and including) 1 January
2018 to (and including) the date on which such amount is redeemed, with such return accruing on
a simple and not compound basis. Due to the revised terms, the convertible zero dividend preference
shares were regarded as an extinguishment and redeemable zero dividend preference shares were
therefore recognised. The redeemable zero dividend preference shares effective interest rate is 9.18%
per annum.
On 27 September 2017, the rights attaching to the redeemable zero dividend preference shares and
the ordinary shares changed so that they rank alongside each other, and the redeemable zero
dividend preference shareholders receive distributions when ordinary shareholders do. Post
27 September 2017, the redeemable zero dividend preference shares are accounted for as an equity
instrument in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 1.4(f).
All future distributions to ordinary and redeemable zero dividend preference shareholders are on the
following basis (pro rata within the respective classes of shares):
•
•
in respect of the first US$15 million of distributions, 80 percent (i.e. US$12 million) to the
redeemable zero dividend preference shareholders and 20 percent (i.e. US$3 million) to the
ordinary shareholders;
in respect of distributions in excess of the first US$15 million: until such time as all redeemable
zero dividend preference shares have been redeemed in full, 44 percent to the redeemable
zero dividend preference shareholders and 56 percent to the ordinary shareholders; thereafter,
100 percent to the ordinary shareholders.
The redeemable zero dividend preference shares are now subject to the distribution in accordance
with articles 4.10 to 4.12 of the Articles. In summary, the distribution is mandatory to distribute when:
(i)
(j)
the Company has available funds, which is the aggregate amount of the Company’s net cash
less working capital requirements for the following 12 months and;
the Company would be able to comply with the solvency test under the Companies Act 2006
(“Solvency Test”) immediately after distribution.
49
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
23. Issued capital
Authorised
Ordinary shares of £ 0.0001 each
Issued and fully paid
Ordinary shares of £ 0.0001 each
At beginning and end of the year
Redeemable zero dividend
preference shares of no par value
At 1 January
Capitalisation of redeemable zero
dividend preference shares (note 22)
At 31 December
24. Other reserve
2017
2016
Number
of shares
500,000,000
–––––––––––
Number
of shares
£’000
50
––––––––
US$’000
Number
of shares
500,000,000
–––––––––––
Number
of shares
358,746,814
–––––––––––
56
––––––––
358,746,814
–––––––––––
–––––––––––
–
–––––––––––
57,000,000
–––––––––––
57,000,000
–––––––––––
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–––––––––––
–
–––––––––––
–
–––––––––––
–
–––––––––––
£’000
50
––––––––
US$’000
56
––––––––
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
–
––––––––
This mainly comprised of 57,000,000 (US$50,688,000) redeemable zero dividend preference shares at
no par value capitalised in September 2017 (2016: the debit amount of US$2,106,000 from 7,711,425
shares of the Company held by Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”) and the amounts of US$3,162,000
credited from the capital redemption of CCP Fund in 2014).
25. Note to the consolidated statement of cash flows
(a) Major non-cash transaction
During the year ended 31 December 2017, interest expenses of US$3,554,000 (2016: US$5,773,000)
related to interest on borrowings and redeemable zero dividend preference shares.
(b) Reconciliation of liabilities arising from financing activities:
Redeemable
zero dividend
preference
Borrowing shares
US$’000 US$’000
At 1 January 2017 2,500 47,469
Changes include in financing cash flows:
Interest expenses paid 335 3,219
Other changes:
Capitalisation of redeemable zero dividend preference shares – (50,688)
Interest expenses (335) –
––––––––– –––––––––
At 31 December 2017 2,500 –
––––––––– –––––––––
50
26. Financial instruments – Risk management
The Group are exposed through their operations to one or more of the following risks:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Fair value risk
Cash flow interest rate risk
Currency risk
Credit risk
Liquidity risk
Concentration risk
Price risk
The policy for managing these risks is set by the board. The policy for each of the above risks is
described in more detail below:
Fair value risk
The Group’s financial assets are predominantly investments in unquoted companies, and the fair
value of each investment depends upon a combination of market factors and the performance of
the underlying asset. The Group does not hedge the market risk inherent in the portfolio but manages
asset performance risk on an asset-specific basis by continuously monitoring each asset’s
performance and charging the change of each asset’s fair value to the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income as necessary.
Cash flow interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate
because of changes in market interest rates. The Group’s exposure to the risk of changes in market
interest rates is relatively small as the Group’s outstanding debt is fixed rate. Meanwhile, the interest
income is not material in the context of the total portfolio return as a whole.
Currency risk
Some of the Group’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses are effectively denominated in currencies
other than US Dollars (the Group’s presentation and functional currency). Fluctuations in the
exchanges rates between these currencies and US Dollars will have an effect on the reported value
of those items.
51
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group’s loss before tax due to a change in the
fair value of monetary assets and liabilities resulting from a reasonably possible change in the US dollar,
with all other variables held constant.
Effect on Effect on
Appreciation/ loss before net asset
(depreciation) tax value
in US$ US$’000 US$’000
2017 +10% 701 701
-10% (701) (701)
2016 +10% 2,739 2,739
-10% (2,739) (2,739)
The assumed movement for currency rate sensitivity analysis is based on the currently observable
market environment.
The Group’s assets and liabilities that are effectively denominated in currencies other than the
functional currency, US Dollars, are:
GBP NOK RMB HKD CAD ZAR Total
2017 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Cash and bank balances 62 – 3 49 – – 114
Investments at FVTPL* 4,484 133 – – 1,635 – 6,252
Loans – 734 – – – – 734
Trade and other receivables – – 488 – – – 488
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Total Assets 4,546 867 491 49 1,635 – 7,588
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Trade and other payables – – (42) – – – (42)
Financial guarantee contracts – – – – – (435) (435)
Provision (103) – – – – – (103)
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Total Liabilities (103) – (42) – – (435) (580)
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
GBP NOK RMB HKD CAD ZAR Total
2016 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Cash and bank balances 176 – 141 50 – – 367
Investments at FVTPL * 20,065 707 – – 5,023 – 25,795
Loans – 495 145 – – – 640
Trade and other receivables – – 385 – – – 385
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Total Assets 20,241 1,202 671 50 5,023 – 27,187
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Trade and other payables – – (78) – – – (78)
Financial guarantee contracts – – – – – (435) (435)
Provision (82) – – – – – (82)
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
Total Liabilities (82) – (78) – – (435) (595)
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
52
Credit risk
The Group is primarily exposed to credit risk from the loans including convertible credit agreements
and loan agreements extended to unquoted portfolio companies, loan interest receivables and other
debtors, in which the directors consider the maximum credit risk to be the carrying value of the
convertible credit agreements, loan agreements, loan interest receivables and other debtors which
amounted to US$1,615,000 (2016: US$28,647,000). Directors consider cash and cash equivalents do
not expose to significant credit risk, because the cash is held at reputable banks. The credit risk
exposure is managed on an asset-specific basis by management.
2017 2016
2017 more 2016 more
2017 up to than 2016 up to than
not past 12 months 12 months 2017 not past 12 months 12 months 2016
due past due past due Total due past due past due Total
US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Convertible credit agreements – 384 350 734 – – 24,495 24,495
Loan agreements – – – – – – 145 145
Trade and other receivables – 476 405 881 – 780 3,227 4,007
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total – 860 755 1,615 – 780 27,867 28,647
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Liquidity risk
The table below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on
the remaining period at the end of reporting period to the contractual maturity date or, if earlier, the
expected date on which the financial liabilities will be settled. The amounts in the table are the
contractual undiscounted cash flows.
Carrying Less than 1-3 3-12 over
Liabilities amount 1 month months months 12 months Total
31 December 2017 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Other payables 1,880 1,545 – – 1,250 2,795
Upper share rights/contingent
share awards 103 – – – 103 103
Short-term borrowing 2,500 – – – 2,500 2,500
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 4,483 1,545 – – 3,853 5,398
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Financial guarantees issued
Maximum amount
guaranteed 435 – – 435 – 435
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
53
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
Carrying Less than 1-3 3-12 over
Liabilities amount 1 month months months 12 months Total
31 December 2016 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000
Trade payables 5 5 – – – 5
Other payables 3,966 3,966 – – – 3,966
Performance incentive
payable 8 – – 8 – 8
Upper share rights/contingent
share awards 82 – – – 82 82
Long-term borrowing 2,500 – – – 2,500 2,500
Redeemable zero dividend
preference shares 47,469 – – – 57,000 57,000
Contractual interest payable – – – – 13,777 13,777
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 54,030 3,971 – 8 73,359 77,338
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Financial guarantees issued
Maximum amount guaranteed 435 – – 435 – 435
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Total 435 – – 435 – 435
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Concentration risk
The main concentration risk for Origo is that the largest investments are concentrated in China for
the amount of US$14,097,000 (2016: US$83,840,000), 79% (2016: 87%) out of the total portfolio value of
US$17,779,000 (2016: US$96,663,000).
Price risk
Price risk may affect the value of listed and unlisted investments as a result of changes in market prices
(other than arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether caused by factors specific to an
individual investment, its issuer or factors affecting all instruments traded in the market.
As the majority of financial instruments are carried at fair value, with fair value changes recognised
in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, all changes in market conditions will directly
affect reported portfolio returns.
Price risk is managed by constructing a diversified portfolio of instruments traded on various markets
and hedging where appropriate.
The following table details the sensitivity to a 10% variation in equity prices. The sensitivity analysis
includes all equity investments held at fair value through profit or loss and adjusts their valuation at
the year end for a 10% change in value.
2017 2016
US$’000 US$’000
Increase in price 1,705 7,202
Decrease in price (1,705) (7,202)
The sensitivity to equity and fund investments has not increased during the year due to net investments
and investment portfolio loss in the year.
54
27. Share-based payments
The Group has a number of share schemes that allow a director, certain ex-employees and its advisors
to acquire shares in the Company, as detailed in Note 1.3(c).
The total cost recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income is shown below:
Equity-settled option
Upper share rights/contingent share awards
Total
2017
US$’000
–
(21)
––––––––
(21)
––––––––
2016
US$’000
(52)
(15)
––––––––
(67)
––––––––
The following table illustrates the number (“No.”) and weighted average exercise prices (“WAEP”) of,
and movements in, share options during the years ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016.
2017 2017 2016 2016
No. WAEP No. WAEP
Outstanding at 1 January 13,500,000 29.22p 20,951,932 26.87p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Granted during the year – – – –
Forfeited during the year – – – –
Exercised during the year – – – –
Expired during the year – – (7,451,932) (22.62p)
Outstanding at 31 December 13,500,000 29.22p 13,500,000 29.22p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Exercisable at 31 December 13,500,000 29.22p 13,500,000 29.22p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding as at
31 December 2017 was 1.56 years (31 December 2016: 2.56 years).
The range of exercise prices for options outstanding at the end of the year was 20 pence to
59.85 pence (31 December 2016: 20 pence to 59.85 pence).
During the year 2016, options including 6,800,000 equity-settled options granted on 26 October 2006
and 651,932 equity-settled options granted on 21 December 2006 have expired.
Outstanding options include 3,500,000, 500,000 and 13,600,000 equity-settled options granted on
13 March 2008, 6 February 2009 and 2 February 2012 respectively to certain directors and employees
of the Company. The Company did not enter into any share-based transactions with parties other
than employees during the years from 2007 to 2016, except as described above.
During the year 2017, there were no options granted, forfeited, exercised or expired.
55
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
The following table illustrates the number (“No.”) and weighted average exercise prices (“WAEP”) of,
and movements in upper share rights and contingent share awards during the years ended
31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016.
2017 2017 2016 2016
No. WAEP No. WAEP
Outstanding at 1 January 7,711,425 9.48p 7,711,425 9.48p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Granted during the year – – – –
Forfeited during the year – – – –
Exercised during the year – – – –
Expired during the year – – – –
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Outstanding at the end of the year 7,711,425 9.48p 7,711,425 9.48p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
Exercisable at the end of the year 7,711,425 9.48p 7,711,425 9.48p
–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––––– ––––––––––
* The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of these options was 9.48 pence.
The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding as at
31 December 2017 was 3.51 years (2016: 4.51 years).
The range of exercise prices for options outstanding at the end of the year was zero to 15.5 pence
(2016: zero to 15.5 pence).
On 16 October 2009, 4,847,099 of upper share rights were granted to certain director, executives and
key employees under the Company’s joint share ownership scheme (“JSOS”). 50% of upper share
rights vested 12 months from the date of grant and 50% of upper share rights vested 24 months from
the date of grant. The fair value of the upper share rights is estimated at the end of each reporting
period using the binomial tree option pricing model. The contractual life of each upper share rights
granted is 10 years.
On 20 July 2012, 1,120,000 of contingent share awards were granted to certain directors, executives
and key employees under the Company’s JSOS, which vested 197 days from the date of grant. The
contractual life of each contingent share award granted is 10 years.
On 30 December 2014, 2,423,358 of share awards were granted to certain key employees under the
Company’s JSOS, which vested immediately at the date of grant. The contractual life of each share
offer granted is 10 years.
The following table lists the inputs to the model used to calculate the fair value of upper share rights
for the year.
Underlying stock price (pence)
Exercise price (pence)
Expected life of option (years)
Expected volatility (%)
Expected dividend yield (%)
Risk-free interest rate (%)
56
2017
1.575
15.4
2
182.20
–
0.50
2016
2.125
15.4
2
373.64
–
0.50
The volatility assumption, measured at the standard deviation of expected share price returns, was
based on a statistical analysis of the Company’s daily share prices from 1 January 2014 to
31 December 2017 using source data from Reuters.
The carrying amount of the liability relating to the upper share rights and the contingent share award
as at 31 December 2017 is US$103,000 (2016: US$82,000) and the credit expense recognised as share-
based payments during the year is US$21,000 (2016: credit expense of US$67,000).
28. Related party transactions
Identification of related parties
The Group has a related party relationship with its subsidiaries, associates and key management
personnel. The Company receives and pays certain debtors and creditors on behalf of its subsidiaries
and the amounts are recharged to the entities. Transactions between the Company and its
subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation.
Transactions with key management personnel
The Group’s key management personnel are the executive and non-executive directors as identified
in the director’s report (Note 7).
Service receiving transactions
The following table provides the total amount of significant transactions and outstanding balances
which have been entered into with related parties during the years ended 31 December 2017 and
31 December 2016.
Amounts due to related parties*
Key management personnel:
Lionel de Saint-Exupery***
Shonaid Jemmett Page***
Hiroshi Funaki***
Philip Peter Scales***
John Chapman***
Other:
Origo Advisors Ltd**
Amounts due from related parties*
Origo Advisors Ltd**
Transactions
Origo Advisors Ltd**
– Consulting services payable
– Release of provision for performance incentive
2017
US$’000
2016
US$’000
–
–
(8)
(9)
(9)
(66)
(138)
–
–
–
(760)
(2,422)
278
189
(1,390)
–
––––––––
(1,769)
4,195
––––––––
57
Notes to the financial statements (continued)
As at 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016, the Group is committed to pay Origo Advisors Ltd
for consulting services fee as below:
Within 1 year
After 1 year but within 5 years
Total
2017
US$’000
1,000
–
––––––––
1,000
––––––––
2016
US$’000
1,200
1,000
––––––––
2,200
––––––––
*
The amount due to Origo Advisors Ltd is unsecured, has no fixed terms of repayment, and bears interest at 8 percent
per annum. The other amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms of repayment.
** Origo Advisors Ltd is controlled by entities whose ultimate beneficiaries include Niklas Ponnert (director of the
Company who resigned in April 2018) and Chris A Rynning (former director of the Company). The transactions were
mutually agreed by both parties at a fixed sum or charged based on cost incurred. The agreement was signed for
four years up to 31 December 2018. A new Asset Realisation Support Agreement was signed in May 2018 to waive
the fixed sum of US$1 million for 2018 as disclosed in Note 28 above and Note 33.
*** Ms. Shonaid Jemmett Page and Mr. Lionel de Saint-Exupery resigned as non-executive directors of the Company
in October 2017. Mr. Hiroshi Funaki was appointed as director of the Company in September 2017, and Mr. Philip
Peter Scales and Mr. John Chapman were appointed as directors of the Company in October 2017.
29. Capital management
The primary objectives of the Group’s capital management are to safeguard the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern and to maintain healthy capital ratios in order to support its business
and maximise shareholders’ value.
The Group manages and makes appropriate adjustments to its capital structure on an ongoing basis
in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristic of the underlying assets. To
maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust dividend payments to shareholders,
return capital to shareholders and/or issue new shares. The Group is not subject to any externally
imposed capital requirements. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during
the years ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016.
The Group monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is net debt divided by capital plus net debt.
Net debt includes total liabilities less cash and bank balances. Capital includes equity attributable to
equity holders of the parent company. The gearing ratios as at the reporting dates were as follows:
Total liabilities
Less: Cash and bank balances
Net debt
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent
Capital
Capital and net debt
Gearing ratio
58
2017
US$’000
5,714
(1,199)
––––––––
4,515
––––––––
14,165
––––––––
14,165
––––––––
18,680
––––––––
24%
2016
US$’000
(restated)
56,482
(1,786)
––––––––
54,696
––––––––
45,517
––––––––
45,517
––––––––
100,213
––––––––
55%
30. Summary of financial assets and financial liabilities by category
Financial assets
Loans and receivables
Fair value through profit or loss – designated*
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Financial guarantee contracts
2017
US$’000
2,073
17,779
––––––––
19,852
––––––––
3,984
435
––––––––
4,419
––––––––
2016
US$’000
5,938
96,518
––––––––
102,456
––––––––
53,940
435
––––––––
54,375
––––––––
* Included investments in associates of the Group that measured at fair value through profit or loss of US$1,607,000
(2016: US$31,752,000).
31. Commitments and contingencies
There were no material contracted commitments or contingent assets or liabilities at 31 December 2017
(31 December 2016: none) that have not been disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.
32. Comparative figures
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform the current year’s presentation.
33. Subsequent events
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In February and April 2018, the Company announced that the sale of a 4.6% and a 3.5%
beneficial interest respectively in Niutech, the operating company of Niutech Energy Ltd., to
Chinese institutional and other investors, for net cash proceeds of US$5.4 million in total. Post
the sales, Origo continues to hold a 3.7 % indirect interest in Niutech.
In April 2018, the Company repaid the US$2.5 million loan that the Company entered into on
5 December 2016 by repaying the US$2.5 million principal amount of the loan in full satisfaction
of the obligation with no interest or penalty payments. The terms of the loan had required the
accrual of 12% annual interest with full repayment of principal and interest no later than
December 2020 in an amount no less than US$3.75 million.
In April 2018, the Company announced the appointment of Arden Partners plc as its nominated
advisor and broker and the resignation of Niklas Ponnert from the Board with immediate effect.
In May 2018, the Company announced that, following the passing of relevant resolutions at the
Extraordinary General Meeting held on 18 May 2018, the 2014 Asset Realisation Support
Agreement with the Company’s investment consultant Origo Advisers Limited had been
replaced with a new agreement effective 1 January 2018 (the “New ARA”). The New ARA
waives Origo Advisers Limited’s entitlement to a fixed fee of US$1 million for 2018 and any future
fixed fees in return for an ongoing fee of 8 percent of all cash returned to shareholders with a
hold back of 25 percent of that amount until all the Group’s assets are sold.
(e)
In June 2018, the Company disposed of a 30.9% beneficial interest respectively in Kincora for
net cash proceeds of US$1.5 million in total. Post the sales, Origo holds no interest in Kincora.
59
Directors, Advisors and Other Information
Directors John Chapman, Non-Executive Chairman
(appointed in October 2017)
Hiroshi Funaki, Non-Executive Director
(appointed in September 2017)
Philip Peter Scales, Non-Executive Director
(appointed in October 2017)
Niklas Ponnert, Director
(resigned in April 2018)
Shonaid Jemmett-Page, Non-Executive Director
(resigned in October 2017)
Lionel de Saint-Exupery, Non-Executive Director
(resigned in October 2017)
Country of incorporation of
parent company
Isle of Man
Company number 005681V
Auditor BDO Limited
25/F, Wing On Centre
111 Connaught Road Central
Hong Kong
Nominated adviser and broker Arden Partners Plc
125 Old Broad Street,
London EC2N 1AR
UK legal advisers Travers Smith LLP
10 Snow Hill,
London EC1A 2AL
60
sterling 171189