Owens & Minor
Annual Report 2003

Plain-text annual report

2003 ANNUAL REPORT & FORM 10-K O W E N S & M I N O R 2 0 0 3 A N N U A L R E P O R T & F O R M 1 0 - K OWENS & MINOR, INC., a FORTUNE 500 company headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, is the leading distributor of national name-brand medical and surgical supplies and a healthcare supply chain management company. With distribution centers throughout the United States, the company serves hospitals, integrated healthcare systems, alternate care providers, group purchasing organiza- tions and the federal government. Owens & Minor provides technology and consulting programs that enable healthcare providers to maximize efficiency and cost-effectiveness in materials purchasing, improve inventory management and streamline logistics across the entire medical supply chain. The company also has established itself as a leader in the development and use of technology. OWENS & MINOR, INC. CORPORATE OFFICE Street Address 4800 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Mailing Address Post Office Box 27626 Richmond, Virginia 23261-7626 804-747-9794 www.owens-minor.com W E I V R E V O Y N A P M O C Owens & Minor, Inc., a FORTUNE 500 company and the leading distributor of national name-brand medical and surgical supplies, is also an innovative healthcare supply chain management company. Surpassing the $4 billion mark in revenue for the first time, Owens & Minor ended 2003 with sales of $4.24 billion. Since its inception in 1882, Owens & Minor has maintained its headquarters in Richmond, Virginia. It serves customers from distribution centers located strategically throughout the United States with a diverse product and service offering. Among its customers are hospitals, integrated healthcare systems, alternate care providers, group purchasing organizations and the federal government. Owens & Minor provides technology and consulting programs that enable healthcare providers to maximize efficiency and cost-effectiveness in materials purchasing, improve inventory management and streamline logistics across the entire medical supply chain, from the origin of product to the patient bedside. The company also has established itself as a leader in the development and use of technology. Owens & Minor places a high value on its relationships with its customers and teammates. With its mission, vision and values as guiding principles, Owens & Minor serves its constituents with integrity and the highest ethical standards. Owens & Minor common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol OMI. As of December 31, 2003, there were approximately 39 million common shares outstanding. About the Cover A closer look at Owens & Minor reveals that the company has responded to the many forces at work in today’s healthcare industry by creating innovative supply chain manage- ment solutions for its supplier partners and its customers. Owens & Minor works with a variety of manufacturers, hospital customers and third party logistics providers in order to offer the most efficient supply chain services in the industry. Responding to rapid changes in the marketplace is a hallmark of Owens & Minor and an important factor in its success. Contents 1 2 Financial Highlights Letter to Shareholders 6 Supply Chain Landscape 8 A Closer Look at Owens & Minor 14 Board of Directors 15 Corporate Officers 16 Corporate Information 17 Form 10-K Annual Report MISSION To create consistent value for our customers and supply chain partners that will maximize shareholder value and long-term earnings growth; we will do this by managing our business with integrity and the highest ethical standards, while acting in a socially responsible manner with particular emphasis on the well-being of our teammates and the communities we serve. VISION To be a world class provider of supply chain management solutions to the selected segments of the healthcare industry we serve. VALUES We believe in high integrity as the guiding principle of doing business. We believe in our teammates and their well-being. We believe in providing superior customer service. We believe in supporting the communities we serve. We believe in delivering long-term value to our shareholders. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in thousands, except ratios, per share data and teammate statistics) Year ended December 31, Net sales Net income(2)(3) Net income per common share - basic(2)(3) Net income per common share - diluted(2)(3) Cash dividends per common share Book value per common share at year-end Stock price per common share at year-end Number of common shareholders Shares of common stock outstanding Gross margin as a percent of net sales Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales(3) Operating earnings as a percent of net sales(3) Long term debt Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities Sales of accounts receivable under receivables financing facility(4) Average inventory turnover Teammates at year-end Percent Change 03/02 02/01 7.2% 13.5% 8.6% 11.8% 12.9% 32.3% 33.4% 3.1% 14.3% 3.8% 105.2% 102.9% 86.8% 13.8% 14.2% (11.2%) (5.8%) 0.7% 2003 $4,244,067 53,641 $ 1.52 $ 1.42 $ 0.35 $ 10.53 $ 21.91 $ 13.5 38,979 2002 2001(1) $3,959,781 47,267 $ 1.40 $ 1.27 $ 0.31 $ 7.96 $ 16.42 $ 13.1 34,113 $3,814,994 23,035 $ 0.69 $ $ 0.68 0.2725 $ $ 6.97 18.50 $ 13.9 33,885 10.5% 7.8% 2.4% 10.6% 10.7% 7.8% 2.5% 7.8% 2.4% $ 209,499 — $ 240,185 $ 125,150 (12.8%) $ 203,449 $ 132,000 (100.0%) 18.1% (5.2%) — 10.3 3,245 — 9.6 2,968 $ 70,000 9.7 2,937 — (100.0%) 9.3% 1.1% (1) Effective January 1, 2002, the company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result, goodwill is no longer amortized. Had the provisions of this statement been effective in 2001, net income, net income per basic common share, and net income per diluted common share would have been $28.4 million, $0.85 and $0.81. (2) In 2002, the company recorded reductions in a restructuring accrual of $0.5 million, or $0.3 million net of tax. In 2001, the company recorded an impairment loss of $1.1 million on an investment in marketable equity securities, a provision for disallowed income tax deductions of $7.2 million, a loss on early retirement of debt of $11.8 million, or $7.1 million net of tax, and a reduction in a restructuring accrual of $1.5 million, or $0.8 million net of tax. (3) In 2002, the company recorded a charge of $3.0 million, or $1.8 million net of tax, due to the cancellation of the company’s contract for mainframe computer services. This charge was included in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. (4) Sales of accounts receivable represents uncollected accounts receivable that have been sold under the company’s off balance sheet receivables financing facility. As this financing facility qualifies as a sale of accounts receivable under generally accepted accounting principles, these amounts are excluded from both accounts receivable and debt on the company’s balance sheets. Net Sales (in billions) Dividends Sales per FTE* (in thousands) Diluted EPS $4.24 $3.81 $3.96 $0.35 $0.31 $0.27 $1,565 $1,455 $1,378 $1.42 $1.27 $0.68 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’01 ’02 ’03 *Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) exclude drivers and OMSolutions Teammates 1 DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, TEAMMATES, CUSTOMERS AND FRIENDS We have grown our business profitably and given our shareholders excellent value. 2003 was no exception. Financial and Financing Highlights Sales grew a strong 7.2% to $4.2 billion. Less than 1% of this was inflation. Most came from increased penetration of existing accounts. Gross margin was 10.5% of net sales, down slightly from 10.6% last year. There is competi- tive pressure in the market, but we are working a plan to offset gross margin erosion. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were unchanged from last year at 7.8%, another remarkable achievement given the investment we have made in new people and new processes to support our new strategic initiatives. Productivity gains, as measured by sales per full-time equivalent teammate, increased 7.6%, helping to hold down SG&A. Net income rose 13.5% and earnings per diluted common share were $1.42, an increase over last year of 11.8%. Our share price increased 33.4% compared to 28.7% for the S&P 500 index. We increased our dividend 12.9% in 2003, and recently announced a 22.2% increase over the fourth quarter dividend for the first quarter of 2004. Our focus will continue to be on total return to shareholders and outperforming our major competitors and the S&P 500 index, as we did in 2003 and for the past five years. Asset management again played a positive role in our success in 2003. Accounts receivable days outstanding declined (this is very good) to 27.8 days from 32.0 days at the end of 2002. Inventory turns improved to 10.3 turns com- pared to 9.6 last year. Annualized return on assets improved from 4.8% at the end of 2002 to 5.2% at the end of 2003. Total cash flow from operations was $94.9 million. G. Gilmer Minor, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Craig R. Smith President and Chief Operating Officer We have just completed another outstanding year, a splendid and remarkable year in our book. We blended the new strategies introduced at the end of 2002 with our core competencies and company values to produce quality results. We grew the top and bottom lines; we balanced the working parts of gross margin, expenses, interest costs, cash flow, and asset management to achieve these quality results just as we have in the past. Certainly there were obstacles in 2003, but there will always be obstacles. Every business in America deals with challenges, but for us, we see more opportunities, more green fields, and that’s what we focus on—that’s the spirit of Owens & Minor and always has been. 2 2 Our share repurchase program, initiated in the fourth quarter of 2002, was concluded after we purchased $10.9 million of common stock and $27.6 million of the then outstanding term convertible securities. Subsequent to the repurchase, we successfully converted to equity virtually all, or $104.4 million, of these outstanding securities, further strengthening our balance sheet. Owens & Minor Total Return 52.3% 35.6% 29.7% 1 year 3 year 5 year Standard & Poors 500 Index Total Return 28.7% 1 year -11.7% 3 year -2.8% 5 year Some Industry Dynamics By all accounts, healthcare is a growth industry. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services* projects that between 2002 and 2013 real hospital spending will grow from $486.5 billion to $934.3 billion, or 92%. This translates into health expenditures growing to 18.4% of GDP in 2013, up from 14.9% in 2002. Wow! What an opportunity! However, it seems that on the front pages of newspapers every day across the country we read about the rising cost of healthcare, the safety of healthcare, the access to healthcare, and the financial woes of some healthcare institutions. Go back 20 years and you will find similar concerns. Does this mean we haven’t made any progress? Absolutely not! Much has been done to control costs and improve personnel productivity to extend quality care throughout the healthcare system, while continuing to provide uncompensated care to millions. The variable that has changed is growth in the numbers of people requiring healthcare. Demand is high and growing. Funding healthcare has been strained by the introduction of new drugs, and devices and procedures that help extend the quality of life with less physical impact on the patient. One outcome of innovative new practices is the shift of surgeries from inpatient to outpatient with less invasive surgical procedures. Perhaps an oversimplification is that philosophically we have a choice. Do we want the innovative research that prolongs life and enhances the quality of life, or not? The answer is yes. We want a prolonged quality of life. Given this framework of more growth and more cost, our role in healthcare is to partner with the acute care hospitals in America, to deliver care efficiently and at the lowest possi- ble total cost without sacrificing quality. Areas such as inventory management, information services, technology interfaces, internal logis- tics, transportation costs and clinical support have become our expertise, our focus and our commitment. We have invested in providing solutions to these growing challenges. We will continue to collaborate with organizations that are focused on these and similar challenges, such as our “best of class” manufacturing partners and other service and technology companies inside and outside of healthcare. Operating Highlights for 2003 We were ranked first in InformationWeek maga- zine’s 2003 survey of the most innovative users of technology for the second time in three years. We also were the leader among all health- care companies for the fourth year in a row. We opened the doors to Owens & Minor University (OMU) for the purpose of * Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: National Health Care Expenditures Projections: 2003 – 2013. Projections are produced annually by the Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 3 becoming a better learning organization, to train and develop our teammates, and through training to enhance our productivity and cus- tomer service. For the nine months OMU was up and running full time, we touched over 1,000 teammates with classroom training, dis- tance learning, programs and seminars. We have already seen positive results, and our teammates have a thirst for more. We also introduced Six Sigma initiatives to focus on improving certain areas of our internal processes. We want to extend our efforts to include customers and suppliers. We have been aided greatly in our Six Sigma efforts by 3M, which provided us with early and ongoing guidance for Six Sigma, as well as resource support and training to get us going. Thank you very much, 3M. We introduced three strategic initiatives for 2003 and beyond: First, we set out to improve the offering of our core distribution. This is our “bread and butter,” and we freshened it with a renewed focus on our technology offerings, more train- Warehouse Lines Per Hour 15.2 14.7 13.6 ’01 ’02 ’03 ing and development of our sales team, improved customer service, and the introduction of MediChoice®, our one-year-old private label line. In addition, our focus on efficiency and internal process improvement has led to steadily improving warehouse lines picked per hour. Mission accom- plished for the year! Second, OMSolutionsSM was created to provide supply chain management consulting and implementation services such as outsourced materials management, integrated operating room supply management, clinical inventory management and the implementation of our technology programs such as WISDOM2 SM. Under the leadership of Mark Van Sumeren, Senior Vice President, OMSolutionsSM, and Tim Gill, Operating Company Vice President, OMSolutionsSM, we ended the year with 24 out- sourcing accounts, 43 consulting agreements and 22 WISDOM2 SM agreements. Mission accomplished for the year! Third, our third party logistics model has been slower to evolve than we originally thought. We have redirected our focus to con- centrate on healthcare providers. This effort will enhance our offerings to our customers, allowing them to more efficiently channel products they are now buying direct from manufacturers through our distribution system. We are also providing a service to manage inbound and outbound freight for our cus- tomers to lower their transportation costs. We are confident this refocused direction will bear fruit. Mission to be accomplished! Worthy of note are two new relationships that increased our sales. We announced a five-year contract with HealthTrust Purchasing Group LP to pursue business relationships with its membership. We signed an estimated $100 million in new business from this contract, which is expected to be fully implemented by June 2004. Also, through OMSolutionsSM, we signed a comprehensive five-year distribution and outsourcing agreement with The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, ranked as the best pediatric hospital in America by U.S. News & World Report and Child magazines. This agree- ment provides process improvement targets and benchmarking to measure cost savings and the effectiveness of our state-of-the-art technology tools. We also entered into a very innovative strate- gic logistics partnership with the Department of Defense to cross dock medical supplies bound for Europe, Iraq, Afghanistan and other points in the Middle East. Together, we created a sin- gle military air bridge to the Middle East and 4 Europe to efficiently expedite supplies to our troops. This logistics solution has worked very well and could become a model for advanced supply chain initiatives in the future. Community Outreach For 122 years, Owens & Minor has been in the business of caring, caring about our teammates, suppliers, shareholders and the communities we serve. From our Home Office in Richmond and 41 locations throughout the United States, Owens & Minor teammates take active roles in their communities. They are involved in feed- ing the homeless, school reading programs, delivering meals to shut-ins, Special Olympics and serving on community boards. Other organizations where Owens & Minor has played an active role include the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, Salvation Army Shoe Fund, National Kidney Foundation, YWCA Women’s Shelter, a number of cancer research centers and the Virginia Healthcare Foundation. By volunteering we have devel- oped a spirit of camaraderie second to none. We partner in our community outreach with Perot Systems, just as we partner with them in business. This nearly doubles our ability to make an impact through volunteerism. We are a team in all respects. Teammates love to feel they make a difference, and what happens in the community is reflected in their attitudes at work. Community building is team building at its utmost. More Management Strength In early August, Mark A. Van Sumeren joined Owens & Minor as Senior Vice President, OMSolutionsSM. Mark was a Vice President at Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, and a former partner at Ernst & Young. He is a twenty-four-year veteran in healthcare. His leadership ability, reputation as a consultant and his remarkable energy have already made a positive impact for us. Looking Ahead It’s very exhilarating to close a great year and begin a new one. However, retrospection is enjoyable for all of a New York second, because the beat goes on and there are more fields to conquer and hills to climb. This business of healthcare is growing, and we are right in the middle of it. We have continued to change, adapting to the times, knowing what our role is, and listening to our customers, always as a leader. The character traits of our company that will keep us in the lead include our determina- tion to be the best, our uninterrupted passion to fulfill our customers’ needs, the hearts of our teammates who show up every day, rain or shine, with smiles on their faces, and an indomitable “will to win” spirit. This is Owens & Minor, past, present and future. The future beckons and we are ready. We know where we want to go and how to get there. Come on along for an exciting and enjoyable ride. After all, you are part of our team! We want to extend our gratitude to our customers and suppliers, our teammates and shareholders, and our many friends in and out of the industry for being there for us, always. Let’s keep a good thing going. Warm regards, G. Gilmer Minor, III Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Craig R. Smith President & Chief Operating Officer 5 THE MORE YOU LOOK AT OWENS & MINOR, THE MORE YOU SEE. Our suppliers meet the critical needs of our hospital customers with state-of-the-art medical and surgical supplies. We work with these manufacturers to receive, warehouse and deliver their products to hospitals. Our traditional distribution services are augmented by inventory management tools, supply chain management services, activity-based pricing, information management, product mix manage- ment, and materials management outsourcing. As a critical link in the medical supply chain, we have developed ways of gathering and using information that help our manufacturer partners with forecasting and production. This information enables our partners to see into the supply chain, providing them with expanding knowledge of customer need. 6 We not only handle traditional distribution for our supplier partners, but we also offer advanced logistics services and information- management tools. We also provide opportuni- ties to participate in our private label program, MediChoice®, and in our FOCUSTM program, which helps suppliers expand market share. By focusing on information gathering and perfecting our supply chain management expertise, we have created unmatched visibility into the supply chain. With our help, our customers can clearly see opportunities to improve supply chain cost and efficiency. Once our products enter the hospital setting, we see further opportunities to improve efficiency and trim costs. Our OMSolutionsSM team works with customers to implement improved supply chain processes, outsource warehousing, implement WISDOM2 SM, our proprietary, web-based analytical service, and manage high-dollar inventory. Our business serves the entire healthcare supply chain from the origin of product to patient bedside. Our 3,200 teammates serve 4,000 healthcare customers from 41 distribution centers nationwide. We offer customers support in the clinical areas of the hospital through our clinical management consulting program. Staffed by experienced clinician consultants, this team helps hospitals improve product and process flow in operating rooms and clinical suites. 7 TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT OWENS & MINOR Working with a variety of the nation’s best-known medical and surgical supply manufacturers, we serve 4,000 healthcare customers around the country with state-of- the-art products and supply chain management services. 8 Owens & Minor, a company founded in 1882, today serves the healthcare supply chain from the origin of product to the patient bedside. Working with a variety of the nation’s best-known medical and surgical supply manufacturers, we serve 4,000 healthcare customers around the country with state-of-the-art products and supply chain management services. Because we are engaged in comprehensive manage- ment of the medical supply chain at every point along the path of a product, our efforts produce vital information that gives our business partners full visibility into the process. This transparency has the potential to transform the supply chain process for customers and suppliers alike. As the healthcare technology leader, we gather and share information, enabling our supplier partners and healthcare customers to see inside the supply chain in a new way. By giving customers and suppliers the ability to understand and then focus on the cost of the supply chain process rather than the cost of the product, we are enabling them to improve efficiency and reduce expenses. This valuable information can, and does, change inventory management behavior. Using a wide-ranging portfolio of products and services, Owens & Minor meets the most critical needs of today’s healthcare customer. We offer traditional distribution Tom Consedine, an Owens & Minor teammate since 1992, is an expert in logistics management. Consedine collaborates with customers and suppliers to create supply chain processes that improve efficiency and lower cost. services through our 41 distribution centers nationwide, inventory management for both commodity and clinical medical supplies and active supply chain management with our innovative CostTrackSM activity-based management program. We also offer information management through innovative technology tools, product mix management through FOCUS™ and MediChoice®, logistics consulting, and materials management outsourcing. Our most efficient supplier partners take advantage of the information we provide, and use it to improve forecasting and production. Our FOCUS™ program, expanded by the addition of a significant manufacturer partner in 2003, is designed to reward our most efficient partners with improved supply chain efficiency and increased market share. Our FOCUS™ suppliers must meet strict service requirements, technology and market share imperatives. MediChoice®, our private label pro- gram, provides participating supplier partners access to new markets, and has given our customers value, additional choice and improved standardization opportunities with commodity products. This program will be expanded in 2004 with a greater variety of products. Customers have responded enthusiastically to the selection and value offered by this Owens & Minor brand. 9 TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT OWENS & MINOR At Owens & Minor, we keep pace with the rapidly changing healthcare industry by closely tracking the evolving needs of our customers. For example, we have maintained a long-term cultural focus on high quality customer service, knowing that customer satisfaction in today’s hospital environment is critical to our success. Our relation- ships with customers are strong, resulting in 7.2% sales growth in 2003, most of which came from growing existing accounts. An important element underlying the satisfaction of our customers is the dependability and accuracy of our operations. Our focus on operational excellence led us to launch a program of process improvement initiatives in 2003, beginning the important effort of standardizing key processes nationwide. As a result, we significantly improved productivity and accuracy in our warehouses in 2003. We intend to intensify efforts in 2004 to standardize our service to customers from coast-to- coast. Looking ahead, we plan to make continual productivity gains through category management and product standardization. An important element underlying the satisfac- tion of our customers is the dependability and accuracy of our operations. Our focus on operational excel- lence led us to launch a program of process improvement initiatives in 2003 beginning the important effort of standardizing key processes nationwide. 10 Celesia Valentine, a 10-year veteran of Owens & Minor, leads a sales team in Florida. Valentine and her team work with hospitals to define the right product and process mix to achieve the lowest total delivered supply chain cost. Traditionally at Owens & Minor, we have owned the products we deliver, and we deliver those products with a high degree of accuracy. Our goal for the future is to take the product from production to point-of-use, managing the process and getting paid for the activity, with or without ownership of the product. We have also helped our customers by investing in our own technology solutions, allowing them to invest in patient care. In fact, Owens & Minor was recognized for its excellence in technology with a first place ranking in the 2003 InformationWeek 500, marking the second time in three years that we have achieved the first place position. At Owens & Minor, we use technology to open our processes to cus- tomers. OMDirectSM, for example, offers streamlined online purchasing and product information through a simple Internet connection, giving customers easy access to previously difficult-to-obtain information. Our company commitment to technology investment was timely, as our technology solutions allow customers to focus on excellence in patient care. 11 Dee Donatelli, a clinician and former hospital materials manager, leads a team of nurse-consultants, who work with our hospital customers to bridge the gap between clinical needs and business imperatives. This knowledgeable consulting team develops business solutions that allow hospitals to respond to supply chain challenges, while main- taining a focus on excellent patient care. TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT OWENS & MINOR Through OMSolutionsSM, our new supply chain consulting and materials management outsourcing group, Owens & Minor has chosen to concentrate on helping hospital customers streamline supply chain management within the walls of their healthcare facilities. Our team improves product flow from loading dock to clini- cal areas, whether these products are distributed through Owens & Minor, or direct from a manufacturer. The OMSolutionsSM team uses our award-winning analytical service, WISDOM2 SM, along with the support of a dedicated analyst, to help our customers identify and implement supply chain improvements. As a result, clinicians are freed from supply chain duties, giving them more time for patient care. We alleviate the distractions of scheduling products for surgeries, stocking supply cabinets, or tracking individual product preferences among physicians. With the OMSolutionsSM team and tools such as PANDAC®, our wound closure asset management program, and SurgiTrackSM, our integrated procedure manage- ment program, we implement systems and processes for hospital customers, reducing redundancy in product handling and inventory. In order to serve the clinical areas of the nation’s hospitals, Owens & Minor has created a new Clinical Consulting program within its OMSolutionsSM group. Staffed by highly experienced nurse-consultants, this program is designed to help 12 hospitals improve standardization and reduce waste and inefficiency in the clinical setting. This team has experience throughout the hospital, including the operating room and other clinical areas, and offers a portfolio of products and services that will meet the specialized, high-tech needs of our customers. With this comprehensive portfolio of products and services, Owens & Minor helps customers streamline the flow of product, process and information. The end result is the creation of immediate and ongoing cost savings for customers through supply chain efficiencies. The Owens & Minor healthcare customer is consequently freed to concentrate on what matters most, delivering excellent patient care. As we move into the future, our customers will profit from improved visibility into the supply chain. As our customers begin to use this transparency to understand capabilities and processes, we will link our activities and businesses in a way that was never before possible. As we look ahead, we will work not only with our suppliers to achieve cross-functional process improvement, but with our customers to achieve ever greater efficiency. In healthcare, we are joined in tangible and intangible ways, and technology will allow us to tap the power of relationships on both sides of the supply chain, unleashing a powerful force for improved supply chain management and reduced healthcare costs. In healthcare, we are joined in tangible and intangible ways, and technology will allow us to tap the power of relationships on both sides of the supply chain, unleashing a powerful force for improved supply chain manage- ment and reduced healthcare costs. 13 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Standing Left-Right Marshall Acuff, Vernard Henley, Peter Redding, John Crotty, James Ukrop, Henry Berling, Richard Fogg Seated Left-Right James Farinholt, Jr., Anne Marie Whittemore, Gil Minor, III, James Rogers A. Marshall Acuff, Jr. (64) 2, 4, 5 Retired Senior Vice President & Managing Director, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. Henry A. Berling (61) 1, 4 Executive Vice President, Owens & Minor, Inc. John T. Crotty (66) 2, 3, 4* Managing Partner, CroBern Management Partnership President, CroBern, Inc. James B. Farinholt, Jr. (69) 1, 2*, 4 Managing Director, Tall Oaks Capital Partners, LLC Richard E. Fogg (63) 2, 3 Retired Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers Vernard W. Henley (74) 2, 3, 5 Retired Chairman & CEO, Consolidated Bank & Trust Company G. Gilmer Minor, III (63) 1*, 4 Chairman & CEO, Owens & Minor, Inc. Peter S. Redding (65) 2, 3, 4 Retired President & CEO, Standard Register Company James E. Rogers (58) 1, 3*, 5 Lead Director, Owens & Minor, Inc. President, SCI Investors Inc. James E. Ukrop (66) 3, 4, 5 Chairman, Ukrop’s Super Markets, Inc. Chairman, First Market Bank Anne Marie Whittemore (57) 1, 3, 5* Partner, McGuireWoods LLP Board Committees: 1Executive Committee, 2Audit Committee, 3Compensation & Benefits Committee, 4Strategic Planning Committee, 5Governance & Nominating Committee, *Denotes Chairman 14 CORPORATE OFFICERS Gil Minor, III Craig Smith Henry Berling Timothy Callahan Charles Colpo Erika Davis Grace den Hartog David Guzmán Jeffrey Kaczka Mark Van Sumeren Richard Bozard Olwen Cape Hugh Gouldthorpe, Jr. G. Gilmer Minor, III (63) Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board since 1994 and Chief Executive Officer since 1984. Mr. Minor was President from 1981 to April 1999. Mr. Minor joined the company in 1963. Craig R. Smith (52) President & Chief Operating Officer President since 1999 and Chief Operating Officer since 1995. Mr. Smith has been with the company since 1989. Henry A. Berling (61) Executive Vice President Executive Vice President since 1995. Mr. Berling has been with the company since 1966. Timothy J. Callahan (52) Senior Vice President,Sales and Marketing Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing since September 2002. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Callahan served as Senior Vice President, Distribution. Prior to that, Mr. Callahan was Regional Vice President, West from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Callahan has been with the company since 1997. Charles C. Colpo (46) Senior Vice President,Operations Senior Vice President, Operations since 1999. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Colpo was Vice President, Operations. Mr. Colpo has been with the company since 1981. Erika T. Davis (40) Senior Vice President,Human Resources Senior Vice President, Human Resources since 2001. From 1999 to 2001, Ms. Davis was Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to that, Ms. Davis served as Director, Human Resources & Training in 1999 and Director, Compensation & HRIS from 1995 to 1999. Ms. Davis has been with the company since 1993. Grace R. den Hartog (52) Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary since February 2003. Ms. den Hartog previously served as a Partner of McGuireWoods LLP from 1990 to February 2003. David R. Guzmán (48) Senior Vice President & Chief Information Officer Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since 2000. Mr. Guzmán was employed by Office Depot from 1999 to 2000, serving as Senior Vice President, Systems Development. From 1997 to 1998, he was employed by ALCOA as Chief Architect, Managing Director, Global Information Services. Jeffrey Kaczka (44) Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Kaczka served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Allied Worldwide, Inc. from 1999 to 2001. Mark A. Van Sumeren (46) Senior Vice President,OMSolutionsSM Senior Vice President, OMSolutionsSM since August 2003. Mr. Van Sumeren previously served as Vice President for Cap Gemini Ernst & Young from 2000 to 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Van Sumeren served as a Partner for Ernst & Young from 1993 to 2000. Richard F. Bozard (56) Vice President,Treasurer Vice President and Treasurer since 1991. Mr. Bozard has been with the company since 1988. Olwen B. Cape (54) Vice President,Controller Vice President and Controller since 1997. Ms. Cape has been with the company since 1997. Hugh F. Gouldthorpe, Jr. (65) Vice President,Quality & Communications Vice President, Quality and Communications since 1993. Mr. Gouldthorpe has been with the company since 1986. Numbers inside parentheses indicate age. 15 2003 CORPORATE INFORMATION Annual Meeting The annual meeting of Owens & Minor, Inc.’s shareholders will be held on Thursday, April 29, 2004, at The Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden, 1800 Lakeside Avenue, Richmond, Virginia. Transfer Agent, Registrar and Dividend Disbursing Agent The Bank of New York Investor Services Department P.O. Box 11258 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1258 800-524-4458 shareowners@bankofny.com Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan The Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan offers holders of Owens & Minor, Inc. common stock an opportunity to buy additional shares automatically with cash dividends and to buy additional shares with voluntary cash payouts. Under the plan, the company pays all brokerage commissions and service charges for the acquisition of shares. Information regarding the plan may be obtained by writing to the transfer agent at the following address: The Bank of New York Dividend Reinvestment Department P.O. Box 1958 Newark, NJ 07101-1958 Shareholder Records Direct correspondence concerning Owens & Minor, Inc. stock holdings or change of address to The Bank of New York’s Investor Services Department (listed above). Direct correspondence concerning lost or missing dividend checks to: The Bank of New York Receive and Deliver Department P.O. Box 11002 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1002 Duplicate Mailings When a shareholder owns shares in more than one account or when several shareholders live at the same address, they may receive multiple copies of annual reports. To eliminate multiple mailings, please write to the transfer agent. Counsel Hunton & Williams Richmond, Virginia Independent Auditors KPMG LLP Richmond, Virginia Press Releases Owens & Minor, Inc.’s press releases are available at www.owens-minor.com. Communications and Investor Relations 804-747-9794 Information for Investors The company files annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The public may read and copy any materials that the company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and informa- tion statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. The address of the company’s Internet website is www.owens-minor.com. Through a link to the SEC’s Internet site on the Investor Relations portion of our Internet website we make available all of our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amend- ments to those reports, as well as beneficial ownership reports filed with the SEC by directors, officers and other reporting persons relating to holdings in Owens & Minor, Inc. securities. This information is available as soon as the filing is accepted by the SEC. The company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Honor and the charters of the Audit, Compensation & Benefits, and Governance & Nominating Committees are available on the company’s Internet website at www.owens-minor.com and are available in print to any shareholder upon request by writing to: Corporate Secretary Owens & Minor, Inc. 4800 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 16 W E I V R E V O Y N A P M O C Owens & Minor, Inc., a FORTUNE 500 company and the leading distributor of national name-brand medical and surgical supplies, is also an innovative healthcare supply chain management company. Surpassing the $4 billion mark in revenue for the first time, Owens & Minor ended 2003 with sales of $4.24 billion. Since its inception in 1882, Owens & Minor has maintained its headquarters in Richmond, Virginia. It serves customers from distribution centers located strategically throughout the United States with a diverse product and service offering. Among its customers are hospitals, integrated healthcare systems, alternate care providers, group purchasing organizations and the federal government. Owens & Minor provides technology and consulting programs that enable healthcare providers to maximize efficiency and cost-effectiveness in materials purchasing, improve inventory management and streamline logistics across the entire medical supply chain, from the origin of product to the patient bedside. The company also has established itself as a leader in the development and use of technology. Owens & Minor places a high value on its relationships with its customers and teammates. With its mission, vision and values as guiding principles, Owens & Minor serves its constituents with integrity and the highest ethical standards. Owens & Minor common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol OMI. As of December 31, 2003, there were approximately 39 million common shares outstanding. About the Cover A closer look at Owens & Minor reveals that the company has responded to the many forces at work in today’s healthcare industry by creating innovative supply chain manage- ment solutions for its supplier partners and its customers. Owens & Minor works with a variety of manufacturers, hospital customers and third party logistics providers in order to offer the most efficient supply chain services in the industry. Responding to rapid changes in the marketplace is a hallmark of Owens & Minor and an important factor in its success. Contents 1 2 Financial Highlights Letter to Shareholders 6 Supply Chain Landscape 8 A Closer Look at Owens & Minor 14 Board of Directors 15 Corporate Officers 16 Corporate Information 17 Form 10-K Annual Report MISSION To create consistent value for our customers and supply chain partners that will maximize shareholder value and long-term earnings growth; we will do this by managing our business with integrity and the highest ethical standards, while acting in a socially responsible manner with particular emphasis on the well-being of our teammates and the communities we serve. VISION To be a world class provider of supply chain management solutions to the selected segments of the healthcare industry we serve. VALUES We believe in high integrity as the guiding principle of doing business. We believe in our teammates and their well-being. We believe in providing superior customer service. We believe in supporting the communities we serve. We believe in delivering long-term value to our shareholders. 2003 ANNUAL REPORT & FORM 10-K O W E N S & M I N O R 2 0 0 3 A N N U A L R E P O R T & F O R M 1 0 - K OWENS & MINOR, INC., a FORTUNE 500 company headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, is the leading distributor of national name-brand medical and surgical supplies and a healthcare supply chain management company. With distribution centers throughout the United States, the company serves hospitals, integrated healthcare systems, alternate care providers, group purchasing organiza- tions and the federal government. Owens & Minor provides technology and consulting programs that enable healthcare providers to maximize efficiency and cost-effectiveness in materials purchasing, improve inventory management and streamline logistics across the entire medical supply chain. The company also has established itself as a leader in the development and use of technology. OWENS & MINOR, INC. CORPORATE OFFICE Street Address 4800 Cox Road Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Mailing Address Post Office Box 27626 Richmond, Virginia 23261-7626 804-747-9794 www.owens-minor.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K È Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the year ended December 31, 2003 ‘ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-9810 OWENS & MINOR, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 4800 Cox Road, Glen Allen, Virginia (Address of principal executive offices) 54-1701843 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 23060 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (804) 747-9794 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $2 par value Preferred Stock Purchase Rights 8 1⁄ 2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Not Listed Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. È The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing sales price) was approximately $986,277,295 as of February 17, 2004. The number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 17, 2004 was 39,153,525 shares. Documents Incorporated by Reference The proxy statement for the annual meeting of security holders on April 29, 2004 is incorporated by reference for Part III. Form 10-K Table of Contents Item No. Part I 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Part II 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part III 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part IV 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 8 8 8 9 9 10 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 “Information for Investors,” located on page 16 of the company’s printed Annual Report, and “Corporate Officers,” located on page 15 of the company’s printed Annual Report, can be found at the end of this electronic document. 2 Item 1. Business The Company Part I Owens & Minor Inc. and subsidiaries (Owens & Minor, O&M or the company) is the leading distributor of national name brand medical and surgical supplies in the United States and a healthcare supply chain management company, distributing approximately 120,000 finished medical and surgical products produced by over 1,000 suppliers to approximately 4,000 customers from 41 distribution centers nationwide. The company’s customers are primarily acute care hospitals and integrated healthcare networks (IHNs), which account for more than 90% of O&M’s net sales. Many of these hospital customers are represented by national healthcare networks (Networks) or group purchasing organizations (GPOs) that negotiate discounted pricing with suppliers and contract distribution services with the company. Other customers include alternate care providers such as clinics, home healthcare organizations, nursing homes, physicians’ offices, rehabilitation facilities and surgery centers. The company typically provides its distribution services under contractual arrangements over periods ranging from three to five years. Most of O&M’s sales consist of consumable goods such as disposable gloves, dressings, endoscopic products, intravenous products, needles and syringes, sterile procedure trays, surgical products and gowns, urological products and wound closure products. Founded in 1882 and incorporated in 1926 in Richmond, Virginia as a wholesale drug company, the company redefined its mission in 1992, selling the wholesale drug division to concentrate on medical and surgical distribution. Since then, O&M has significantly expanded and strengthened its national presence through internal growth and acquisitions, generating over $4 billion of net sales in 2003. The Industry Distributors of medical and surgical supplies provide a wide variety of products and services to healthcare providers, including hospitals and hospital-based systems, IHNs and alternate care providers. The company contracts with these providers directly and through Networks and GPOs. The medical/surgical supply distribution industry continues to grow due to the aging population and emerging medical technology, which results in new healthcare procedures and products. Over the years, healthcare providers have continued to change and model their health systems to meet the needs of the markets they serve. They have forged strategic relationships with national medical and surgical supply distributors to meet the challenges of managing the supply procurement and distribution needs of their entire network. The traditional role of distributors in warehousing and delivering medical and surgical supplies to customers continues to evolve into the role of assisting customers to better manage the entire supply chain. In recent years, the overall healthcare market has been characterized by the consolidation of healthcare providers into larger and more sophisticated entities seeking to lower their total costs. These providers have sought to lower total product costs through incremental value-added services they receive from their medical and surgical supply distributors. These trends have driven significant consolidation within the medical/surgical supply distribution industry due to the competitive advantages enjoyed by larger distributors, which include, among other things, the ability to serve nationwide customers, buy inventory in large volume and develop technology platforms and decision support systems. The Business Through its core distribution business, the company purchases a high volume of medical and surgical products from suppliers, inventories these items at its distribution centers and provides delivery services to its customers. O&M’s 41 distribution centers are located throughout the United States and are situated close to major customer facilities. These distribution centers generally serve hospitals and other customers within a 200-mile radius, delivering most medical and surgical supplies with a fleet of leased trucks. Almost all of O&M’s delivery personnel are employees of the company, providing more effective control of customer service. Contract carriers and parcel services are also used in situations where it is more cost-effective. The company 3 customizes its product pallets and truckloads according to the customers’ needs, thus enabling them to reduce costs on the receiving end. Furthermore, delivery times are adjusted to customers’ needs, allowing them to streamline receiving activities. O&M strives to make the supply chain more efficient through the use of advanced warehousing, delivery and purchasing techniques, enabling customers to order and receive products using just-in-time and stockless services. A key component of this strategy is a significant investment in advanced information technology, which includes automated warehousing technology as well as OMDirectSM, an Internet-based product catalog and direct ordering system that supplements existing technologies to communicate with both customers and suppliers. O&M is also focused on using its technology and experience to provide supply chain management consulting, outsourcing, and logistics services. Products & Services In addition to its core medical and surgical supply distribution service, the company offers value-added services in supply chain management—from origin of product to patient bedside. O&M’s value portfolio includes inventory management, product mix management, information technology, logistics consulting and outsourcing to help hospitals and healthcare systems streamline their supply chain, control healthcare costs and increase profitability. Some of these services include: • OMSolutionsSM: The professional services unit of O&M, OMSolutionsSM performs supply chain consulting and outsourcing services for customers. Programs offered by OMSolutionsSM include long-term partnership initiatives such as outsourced materials management; clinical/product management consulting; integrated operating room supply management; order optimization; WISDOM2SM implementation; and outsourced warehousing. OMSolutionsSM also offers a menu of supply chain management services such as receiving and storeroom redesign, physical inventories and reconfiguration of periodic automatic replenishment systems. These services are designed to improve supply chain efficiency and allow the provider to focus on patient care. • Clinical/Product Management Consulting: This OMSolutionsSM program involves working with customers’ clinicians to identify and implement opportunities to provide standardization and reduce unnecessary utilization. The program provides experienced, O&M-trained clinicians, equipped with product information from the company’s WISDOM2SM decision-support tool. • Third Party Logistics (3PL): Through its 3PL offerings, Owens & Minor provides logistics and supply chain management services in two main categories: warehousing and transportation management. In order to make the most of these opportunities, the company leverages its existing relationships with suppliers and end-users, its activity-based costing expertise, and its distribution facilities, transportation systems and information technology. The goal of O&M’s 3PL services is to ensure that products reach the patient in the most cost-effective manner. • CostTrackSM: This activity-based management approach helps customers identify and track the costs in their procurement and handling activities, giving them the information they need to become more efficient, raise employee productivity and cut costs. With CostTrackSM, customers choose the services they need and pay according to the services selected, as compared to a traditional cost-plus pricing model. In 2003, 32% of the company’s net sales were generated through the CostTrackSM program. • WISDOMSM: This Internet-accessed decision support tool connects customers, suppliers and GPOs to the company’s data warehouse. WISDOMSM offers customers online access to a wide variety of reports, which summarize their purchase history with O&M, contract compliance, product usage and other related data. This timely information helps customers consolidate purchasing information across their healthcare systems and identify opportunities for product standardization, contract compliance and supplier consolidation. • WISDOM2SM: The second generation of WISDOMSM, this Internet-based decision support tool provides customers access to purchasing information for not only their purchases from Owens & Minor, but for 4 all medical/surgical manufacturers and suppliers in their materials management information systems. WISDOM2SM enables the customer to identify, prioritize and track cost savings initiatives. The intelligence provided by the program helps customers identify opportunities for product standardization, contract compliance, order optimization and efficiencies in their overall purchasing activity. PANDAC® Wound Closure Asset Management Program: This inventory management program provides customers with an evaluation of their current and historical wound closure inventories and usage levels, helping them reduce their investment in high-cost wound management supplies and control their costs per operative case. FOCUSTM: This supplier partnership program drives product standardization and consolidation for the company and its customers. By increasing the volume of purchases from the company’s most efficient suppliers, FOCUSTM provides operational benefits and cost savings throughout the supply chain. FOCUSTM centers around both commodity and preference product standardization. • • • MediChoice®: In 2002, the company launched this private label program designed to provide value and choice to customers. The MediChoice® line currently includes commodity products for patient care, the operating room, labor and delivery as well as minor procedure kits and trays. The company plans to continue to expand its private-label portfolio. Customers The company currently provides its distribution, consulting and outsourcing services to approximately 4,000 healthcare providers, including hospitals, IHNs and alternate care providers, contracting with them directly and through Networks and GPOs. In recent years, the company has also begun to provide logistics services to manufacturers of medical and surgical products. Networks and GPOs Networks and GPOs are entities that act on behalf of a group of healthcare providers to obtain better pricing and other benefits that may be unavailable to individual members. Hospitals, physicians and other types of healthcare providers have joined Networks and GPOs to take advantage of improved economies of scale and to obtain services from medical and surgical supply distributors ranging from discounted product pricing to logistical and clinical support. Networks and GPOs negotiate directly with medical and surgical product suppliers and distributors on behalf of their members, establishing exclusive or multi-supplier relationships. However, networks and GPOs cannot ensure that members will purchase their supplies from a given distributor. O&M is a distributor for Novation, the supply company of VHA, Inc. and University HealthSystem Consortium, which represents the purchasing interests of more than 2,400 healthcare organizations. Sales to Novation members represented approximately 49% of the company’s net sales in 2003. The company is also a distributor for Broadlane, a GPO providing national contracting for more than 500 acute care hospitals and more than 1,700 sub-acute care facilities, including Tenet Healthcare Corporation, one of the largest for-profit hospital chains in the nation. Sales to Broadlane members represented approximately 15% of O&M’s net sales in 2003. IHNs Integrated Healthcare Networks (IHNs) are typically networks of different types of healthcare providers that seek to offer a broad spectrum of healthcare services and comprehensive geographic coverage to a particular local market. IHNs have become increasingly important because of their expanding role in healthcare delivery and cost containment and their reliance upon the hospital as a key component of their organizations. Individual healthcare providers within a multiple-entity IHN may be able to contract individually for distribution services; however, the providers’ shared economic interests create strong incentives for participation in distribution contracts established at the system level. Because IHNs frequently rely on cost containment as a competitive advantage, IHNs have become an important source of demand for O&M’s enhanced inventory management and other value-added services. 5 Individual Providers In addition to contracting with healthcare providers at the IHN level, and through Networks and GPOs, O&M contracts directly with individual healthcare providers. Sales and Marketing O&M’s sales and marketing function is organized to support its field sales teams of approximately 250 people. Based from the company’s distribution centers nationwide, the company’s local sales teams are positioned to respond to customer needs quickly and efficiently. National account directors work closely with Networks and GPOs to meet their needs and coordinate activities with their individual member facilities. In addition, O&M has a national field organization, OMSpecialtiesSM, which is focused on assisting customers in the clinical environment, and an OMSolutionsSM team focused on supply chain consulting and outsourcing. The company’s integrated sales and marketing strategy offers customers value-added services in logistics, information management, asset management and product mix management. O&M provides special training and support tools to its sales team to help promote these programs and services. Contracts and Pricing Industry practice is for healthcare providers, their Networks, or their GPOs to negotiate product pricing directly with suppliers and then negotiate distribution pricing terms with distributors. When product pricing is not determined by contracts between the supplier and the healthcare provider, it is determined by the distribution agreement between the healthcare provider and the distributor. The majority of O&M’s distribution arrangements compensate the company on a cost-plus percentage basis under which a negotiated fixed percentage distribution fee is added to the product cost agreed to by the customer and the supplier. The determination of this percentage distribution fee is typically based on customer size, as well as other factors, and usually remains constant for the life of the contract. In many cases, distribution contracts in the medical/surgical supply industry specify a minimum volume of product to be purchased and are terminable by the customer upon short notice. In some cases the company may offer pricing that varies during the life of the contract, depending upon purchase volume and, as a result, the negotiated fixed percentage distribution fee may increase or decrease. Under these contracts, customers’ distribution fees may be re-set after a measurement period to either more or less favorable pricing based on significant changes in purchase volume. If a customer’s distribution fee percentage is adjusted, the modified percentage distribution fee applies only to a customer’s purchases made following the change. Because customer sales volumes typically change gradually, changes in distribution fee percentages for individual customers under this type of arrangement have an insignificant effect on total company results. Pricing under O&M’s CostTrackSM activity-based pricing model differs from pricing under a traditional cost-plus model. With CostTrackSM, the pricing of services provided to customers is based on the type and level of services that they choose, as compared to a traditional cost-plus pricing model. As a result, this pricing model more accurately aligns the distribution fees charged to the customer with the costs of the individual services provided. Pricing for consulting and outsourcing is generally determined by the level of service provided. O&M also has arrangements that charge incremental fees for additional distribution and enhanced inventory management services, such as more frequent deliveries and distribution of products in small units of measure. Although the company’s sales personnel based in the distribution centers negotiate local arrangements and pricing levels with customers, corporate management has established minimum pricing levels and a contract review process. 6 Suppliers O&M believes that its size, strength and long-standing relationships enable it to obtain attractive terms from suppliers, including discounts for prompt payment and volume incentives. The company has well-established relationships with virtually all major suppliers of medical and surgical supplies, and works with its largest suppliers to create operating efficiencies in the supply chain. Approximately 16% of O&M’s net sales in 2003 were sales of Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. products. Approximately 14% of O&M’s 2003 net sales were sales of products of the subsidiaries of Tyco International, which include the Kendall Company, United States Surgical and Mallinckrodt. Information Technology To support its strategic efforts, the company has developed information systems to manage all aspects of its operations, including warehouse and inventory management, asset management and electronic commerce. O&M believes that its investment in and use of technology in the management of its operations provides the company with a significant competitive advantage. In 2002, O&M signed a seven-year agreement with Perot Systems Corporation to outsource its information technology (IT) operations, which include the management and operation of its mainframe computer and distributed services processing as well as application support, development and enhancement services. This agreement extends and expands a relationship that began in 1998. This relationship has allowed the company to provide resources to major IT initiatives, which support internal operations and enhance services to customers and suppliers. The company has focused its technology expenditures on electronic commerce, data warehouse and decision support, supply chain management and warehousing systems, sales and marketing programs and services, as well as significant infrastructure enhancements. Owens & Minor is an industry leader in the use of electronic commerce to conduct business transactions with customers and suppliers, using OMDirectSM to supplement existing EDI and XML technologies. Asset Management In the medical/surgical supply distribution industry, a significant investment in inventory and accounts receivable is required to meet the rapid delivery requirements of customers and provide high-quality service. As a result, efficient asset management is essential to the company’s profitability. O&M is highly focused on effective control of inventory and accounts receivable, and draws on technology to achieve this goal. Inventory The significant and ongoing emphasis on cost control in the healthcare industry puts pressure on suppliers, distributors and healthcare providers to create more efficient inventory management systems. O&M has responded to these ongoing challenges by developing inventory forecasting capabilities, a client/server warehouse management system, a product standardization and consolidation initiative, and a vendor-managed inventory process. This vendor-managed inventory process allows some of the company’s major suppliers to electronically monitor daily sales, inventory levels and product forecasts so they can automatically and accurately replenish O&M’s inventory. Accounts Receivable The company’s credit practices are consistent with those of other medical and surgical supply distributors. O&M actively manages its accounts receivable to minimize credit risk and does not believe that the risk of loss associated with accounts receivable poses a significant risk to its results of operations. 7 Competition The medical/surgical supply distribution industry in the United States is highly competitive and consists of three major nationwide distributors: O&M, Cardinal Health, and McKesson Medical-Surgical, a subsidiary of McKesson HBOC, Inc. The industry also includes smaller national distributors of medical and surgical supplies and a number of regional and local distributors. Competitive factors within the medical/surgical supply distribution industry include total delivered product cost, product availability, the ability to fill and invoice orders accurately, delivery time, services provided, inventory management, information technology, electronic commerce capabilities and the ability to meet special customer requirements. O&M believes its emphasis on technology, combined with its customer-focused approach to distribution and value-added services, enables it to compete effectively with both larger and smaller distributors by being located near the customer and offering a high level of customer service. Other Matters Regulation The medical/surgical supply distribution industry is subject to regulation by federal, state and local government agencies. Each of O&M’s distribution centers is licensed to distribute medical and surgical supplies as well as certain pharmaceutical and related products. The company must comply with regulations, including operating and security standards for each of its distribution centers, of the Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, state boards of pharmacy and, in certain areas, state boards of health. O&M believes it is in material compliance with all statutes and regulations applicable to distributors of medical and surgical supply products and pharmaceutical and related products, as well as other general employee health and safety laws and regulations. Employees At the end of 2003, the company had 3,245 full-time and part-time employees. O&M believes that ongoing employee training is critical to performance, using Owens & Minor University, an in-house training program including classes in leadership, management development, finance, operations and sales. Management believes that relations with employees are good. Item 2. Properties O&M’s corporate headquarters are located in western Henrico County, in a suburb of Richmond, Virginia, in facilities leased from unaffiliated third parties. The company owns two undeveloped parcels of land adjacent to its corporate headquarters. The company also owns an undeveloped parcel of land in nearby Hanover County to be used for its future corporate headquarters, which is expected to be completed in late 2005. The company leases offices and warehouses for 40 of its distribution centers across the United States from unaffiliated third parties. In addition, the company has a warehousing arrangement in Honolulu, Hawaii with an unaffiliated third party. In the normal course of business, the company regularly assesses its business needs and makes changes to the capacity and location of its distribution centers. The company believes that its facilities are adequate to carry on its business as currently conducted. A number of leases are scheduled to terminate within the next several years. The company believes that, if necessary, it could find facilities to replace these leased premises without suffering a material adverse effect on its business. Item 3. Legal Proceedings See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 15. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders During the fourth quarter of 2003, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders. 8 Part II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters Owens & Minor, Inc.’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol OMI. As of December 31, 2003, there were approximately 13,500 common shareholders. See “Quarterly Financial Information” under Item 15 for high and low closing sales prices of the company’s common stock. Item 6. Selected Financial Data (in thousands, except ratios and per share data) Summary of Operations: Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income(1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income, excluding goodwill amortization(1)(2)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per Common Share: Net income - basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income - diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average number of shares outstanding - basic . . . . Average number of shares outstanding - diluted . . Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock price at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Book value at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per Common Share, Excluding Goodwill Amortization(3): Net income - basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income - diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of Financial Position: Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Ratios: Gross margin as a percent of net sales . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average inventory turnover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 $4,244,067 53,641 $ $3,959,781 47,267 $ $3,814,994 23,035 $ $3,503,583 33,088 $ $3,194,134 27,979 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 53,641 1.52 1.42 35,204 39,333 0.35 21.91 10.53 1.52 1.42 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 47,267 1.40 1.27 33,799 40,698 0.31 16.42 7.96 1.40 1.27 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 28,363 0.69 0.68 33,368 40,387 0.2725 18.50 6.97 0.85 0.81 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 38,417 1.01 0.94 32,712 39,453 0.2475 17.75 6.41 1.17 1.08 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 32,807 0.86 0.82 32,574 39,098 0.23 8.94 5.58 1.01 0.95 $ 385,743 $1,045,748 $ 209,499 $ $ 410,355 — $ 385,023 $1,009,477 $ 240,185 $ 125,150 $ 271,437 $ 311,778 $ 953,853 $ 203,449 $ 132,000 $ 236,243 $ 233,637 $ 867,548 $ 152,872 $ 132,000 $ 212,772 $ 219,448 $ 865,000 $ 174,553 $ 132,000 $ 182,381 10.5% 10.6% 10.7% 10.7% 10.7% 7.8% 10.3 2.0 7.8% 9.6 2.1 7.8% 9.7 1.8 7.7% 9.5 1.6 7.8% 9.2 1.6 (1) (2) (3) In 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, net income included reductions in a 1998 restructuring accrual of $0.5 million, $1.5 million, $0.8 million and $1.0 million, or $0.3 million, $0.8 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million net of tax. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2002, net income included a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses of $3.0 million, or $1.8 million net of tax, due to the cancellation of the company’s contract for mainframe computer services. In 2001, net income included a loss on early retirement of debt of $11.8 million, or $7.1 million net of tax, an impairment loss of $1.1 million on an investment in marketable equity securities and a provision for disallowed income tax deductions of $7.2 million. See Notes 6, 8 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Effective January 1, 2002, the company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result, goodwill is no longer amortized. Data for 2001 and prior periods have been restated to exclude the effect of goodwill amortization in order to present a more meaningful comparison. 9 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 2003 Financial Results Overview. In 2003, O&M earned net income of $53.6 million, or $1.42 per diluted common share, compared with $47.3 million, or $1.27 per diluted common share in 2002, and $23.0 million, or $0.68 per diluted common share in 2001. The increase from 2002 to 2003, which was 13% for net income and 12% for net income per diluted common share, resulted from increased sales, reduced financing costs, improved productivity in field operations and a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by increased spending on strategic initiatives and gross margin pressure. The increase from 2001 to 2002 was the result of increased sales, reduced financing costs, success in controlling operating expenses and improving productivity, the elimination of goodwill amortization, and several significant items described in more detail below. Significant items that affect comparability of results. In 2002, the company incurred a $3.0 million charge, or $1.8 million net of tax, due to the cancellation of a mainframe computer services contract that was replaced by a new information technology agreement. In 2001, the company incurred the following expenses that affect year-to-year comparability: • A charge of $11.8 million, or $7.1 million net of tax, as a result of the early retirement of debt. • A $7.2 million additional tax provision related principally to disallowed interest deductions for corporate-owned life insurance for the years 1995 through 1998. • A $1.1 million impairment loss on an investment in marketable equity securities. • Goodwill amortization of $6.0 million, or $5.3 million, net of tax. Goodwill amortization was discontinued after 2001 as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Net income in 2002 and 2001 also included reductions in a restructuring reserve, originally established in 1998, of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, net of tax. Results of Operations The following table presents the company’s consolidated statements of income on a percentage of net sales basis: Year ended December 31, 2003 2002 2001 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 89.5 89.4 89.3 10.5 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.8 Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Restructuring credit Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on investment Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 (0.0) 0.1 2.1 0.8 10.6 7.8 0.4 — (0.0) 2.5 0.3 0.0 (0.0) — 0.2 2.0 0.8 10.7 7.8 0.4 0.2 (0.0) 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.8 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3% 1.2% 0.6% 10 Net sales. Net sales increased 7% to $4.24 billion for 2003, from $3.96 billion in 2002. Increased sales volume to existing customers accounted for the vast majority of the increase in sales, with the remainder of the increase contributed by new business. Net sales increased by 4% to $3.96 billion for 2002, from $3.81 billion for 2001. During 2002, the company’s sales were affected by losses of certain customers in late 2001 and early 2002, including those who chose other distributors in 2001 in connection with the Novation contract renewal. In April 2001, the company signed a new distribution agreement with Novation, the supply company of VHA, Inc. and University HealthSystem Consortium, continuing its long-standing relationship with these organizations. Other new business awarded in early 2002 transitioned more slowly than expected; however, the new business, combined with penetration of existing accounts, more than offset the losses. Gross margin. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales for 2003 decreased to 10.5% from 10.6% in 2002 and 10.7% in 2001. This decrease is primarily the result of competitive pricing pressure as well as increases in sales volume with larger customers. Competitive pricing pressure has been a significant factor in recent years, and management expects this trend to continue. The company also has access to fewer inventory buying opportunities, as suppliers seek more restrictive agreements with distributors. The company is working to counteract the effects of these trends by offering customers a wide range of value-added services, such as OMSolutionsSM, PANDAC® and other programs, as well as expanding the MediChoice® private label product line. The company will also continue to work with suppliers on programs to enhance gross margin. Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were 7.8% of sales in 2003, 2002 and 2001. In late 2002, the company launched new strategic initiatives, which include the OMSolutionsSM and third-party logistics services, and Owens & Minor University, the company’s new in-house training program. In 2003, the company continued the implementation of these initiatives by hiring staff and marketing new services to customers. Spending on these initiatives increased gradually throughout 2003, with most of the expense being incurred during the second half of the year. Productivity improvements achieved in the core distribution business partially offset costs associated with the implementation of these initiatives. The company expects to continue to invest in these initiatives in 2004. The company will also continue to focus on operational standardization which management expects to result in productivity improvements. In July 2002, the company entered into a seven-year information technology agreement with Perot Systems Corporation, expanding an existing outsourcing relationship. As a result of the agreement, O&M recorded a liability for termination costs of $3.0 million in connection with the cancellation of its then existing contract for mainframe computer services. This charge is included in SG&A expenses for 2002. SG&A expense in 2002 was comparable as a percent of sales to 2001, despite the $3.0 million charge, partly as a result of a decrease in warehouse personnel costs made possible by the completion of significant customer and business transitions that occurred in 2001. Additionally, SG&A continued to improve as a result of ongoing company-wide efforts to increase productivity and reduce expenses. Restructuring credits. As a result of the cancellation of a significant customer contract in 1998, the company recorded a restructuring charge of $6.6 million, after taxes, to downsize operations. The company periodically re-evaluates its restructuring reserve, and since the actions under this plan have resulted in lower projected total costs than originally anticipated, the company recorded reductions in the reserve in 2002 and 2001 of $0.5 million and $1.5 million, which have increased net income by $0.3 million and $0.8 million. These adjustments resulted primarily from the reutilization of warehouse space that had previously been vacated under the restructuring plan and the resolution of uncertainties related to potential asset write-offs. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, amounts of $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million were charged against the restructuring liability. The remaining accrual consists of losses on a lease commitment for vacated office space. 11 Financing costs. The following table presents a summary of the company’s financing costs for 2003, 2002 and 2001: (in millions) Year ended December 31, Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finance charge income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 2001 $ 9.0 0.8 2.9 12.7 5.2 $10.4 1.8 7.0 19.2 4.2 $13.4 4.3 7.1 24.8 4.5 Financing costs excluding finance charge income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17.9 $23.4 $29.3 The decrease in financing costs from 2002 to 2003 resulted primarily from reductions in outstanding financing, most significantly the repurchase of $20.8 million and conversion of $104.4 million of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities. In addition, 2002 financing costs included a write-off of $0.2 million of deferred financing costs related to the replacement of the company’s revolving credit facility, and $0.7 million in fees related to the origination of a new off-balance sheet receivables financing facility (Receivables Financing Facility). The decrease in financing costs from 2001 to 2002 was primarily driven by lower outstanding financing and lower effective interest rates. Effective interest rates improved as a result of both the refinancing of the company’s long-term debt in mid-2001 and from decreases in short-term interest rates. The company expects to continue to manage its financing costs by managing working capital levels. The repurchases and conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities that took place in late 2002 and 2003 will reduce future financing costs by an annual rate of $7.1 million, compared to periods prior to the repurchase and conversion activity. In addition, future financing costs will be affected primarily by changes in short-term interest rates and working capital requirements. Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt. In 2001, the company retired $150 million of 10.875% Senior Subordinated 10-year Notes due in 2006, replacing them with $200 million of 8.50% Senior Subordinated 10-year Notes. The early retirement resulted in a loss of $11.8 million, consisting of $8.4 million of retirement premiums, a $3.2 million write-off of debt issuance costs and $0.2 million of fees. Losses and gains on early retirement of debt in 2002 and 2003 resulted from repurchases of the company’s mandatorily redeemable preferred securities. Loss (gain) on investment. The company owned equity securities of a provider of business-to-business e- commerce services in the healthcare industry. The market value of these securities fell significantly below the company’s original cost basis and, as management believed that recovery in the near term was unlikely, the company recorded an impairment charge of $1.1 million in 2001. The company sold this investment in 2003 for a gain of $68 thousand over the adjusted cost basis. Income taxes. The provision for income taxes was $34.2 million, compared with $31.0 million in 2002 and $29.8 million in 2001. Income tax expense for 2001 included a $7.2 million provision for estimated tax liabilities related principally to interest deductions for corporate-owned life insurance claimed on the company’s tax returns for the years 1995 through 1998. The company’s effective tax rate was 38.9% in 2003, compared with 39.6% in 2002 and 56.4% in 2001. The reduction in rate from 2002 to 2003 resulted primarily from lower effective state income tax rates. The effective tax rate in 2002 was lower than 2001 because of the $7.2 million provision mentioned above, nondeductible goodwill amortization expense in 2001, and lower effective state income tax rates. 12 Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity. In 2003, the company generated $94.9 million of cash flow from operations, compared with $14.3 million used for operations in 2002 and $1.6 million provided by operations in 2001. In both 2002 and 2001, the company reduced its sales of accounts receivable under its Receivables Financing Facility, resulting in $70 million and $10 million decreases in operating cash flow. The company uses the facility as a source of short-term financing, selling receivables as needed to provide cash for operations. Cash flows in 2003 were positively affected by improved collections of accounts receivable as well as timing of payments for inventory purchases. Accounts receivable days sales outstanding at December 31, 2003 were 27.8 days, compared with 32.0 days at December 31, 2002. Inventory turnover improved from 9.6 times in 2002 to 10.3 times in 2003. Excluding the effect of sales of accounts receivable, operating cash flows in 2002 were favorable to 2001, as a result of inventory reductions made possible by the completion of customer transitions that began in 2001. On July 2, 2001, the company issued $200 million of 8.50% Senior Subordinated Notes which mature in July 2011. The proceeds from these notes were used to retire the company’s $150 million of 10.875% Senior Subordinated Notes and to reduce the amount of outstanding financing under the Receivables Financing Facility. In conjunction with the new notes, the company entered into interest rate swap agreements through 2011 under which the company pays counterparties a variable rate based on London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the counterparties pay the company a fixed interest rate of 8.50% on a notional amount of $100 million. Effective April 30, 2002, the company replaced its revolving credit facility with an agreement expiring in April 2005. The credit limit of the facility is $150 million, of which $6.5 million is reserved for certain letters of credit. The interest rate is based on, at the company’s discretion, LIBOR, the Federal Funds Rate or the Prime Rate. Under the facility, the company is charged a commitment fee of between 0.30% and 0.40% on the unused portion of the facility, and a utilization fee of 0.25% if borrowings exceed $75 million. The terms of the agreement limit the amount of indebtedness that the company may incur, require the company to maintain certain levels of net worth, current ratio, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, and restrict the ability of the company to materially alter the character of the business through consolidation, merger, or purchase or sale of assets. At December 31, 2003, the company was in compliance with these covenants. Effective April 30, 2002, the company replaced its Receivables Financing Facility with an agreement expiring in April 2005. Under the terms of the facility, O&M Funding is entitled to sell, without recourse, up to $225 million of its trade receivables to a group of unrelated third party purchasers at a cost of funds based on either commercial paper rates, the Prime Rate, or LIBOR. The terms of the agreement require the company to maintain certain levels of net worth, current ratio, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, and restrict the company’s ability to materially alter the character of the business through consolidation, merger, or purchase or sale of assets. At December 31, 2003, the company was in compliance with these covenants. In November 2002, the company announced a repurchase plan representing a combination of its common stock and its $2.6875 Term Convertible Securities, Series A issued by the company’s wholly owned subsidiary Owens & Minor Trust I (Securities). Under this plan, up to $50 million of Securities and common stock, with a maximum of $35 million in common stock, could be purchased by the company. The shares of common stock and Securities could be acquired from time to time at management’s discretion through December 31, 2003 in the open market, in block trades, in private transactions or otherwise. In December 2002, the company repurchased 137,000 Securities for $6.6 million. In the first quarter of 2003, the company repurchased an additional 415,449 Securities for $20.4 million, and 661,500 shares of common stock for $10.9 million. The repurchase of Securities resulted in a gain of $84 thousand in 2002 and a loss of $157 thousand in 2003. In the third quarter of 2003, the company initiated and completed the redemption of its outstanding Securities, resulting in the conversion of $104.4 million of Securities into 5.1 million shares of common stock. The remaining Securities, representing a liquidation value of $27 thousand, were redeemed by the company. 13 The company expects that its available financing will be sufficient to fund its working capital needs and long-term strategic growth, although this cannot be assured. At December 31, 2003, O&M had $143.5 million of unused credit under its revolving credit facility and $225.0 million of unused financing under its Receivables Financing Facility. The following is a summary of the company’s significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003: (in millions) Contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase obligations(2) Operating leases(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $200.0 166.2 72.3 0.2 28.5 Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $467.2 Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years After 5 years $ — 30.1 25.2 0.1 0.7 $56.1 $ — $ — $200.0 17.3 59.4 59.4 2.8 32.2 12.1 — 0.1 — 19.1 6.4 2.3 $94.0 $77.9 $239.2 (1) (2) See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (3) Other long-term liabilities represent obligations for retirement plans. Expected timing of payments is based on actuarial assumptions and actual timing of payments could vary significantly from amounts projected. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures were approximately $17.7 million in 2003, compared to $9.8 million in 2002 and $16.8 million in 2001. The increase from 2002 to 2003 included $6.1 million of additional spending on computer software, as the company focused on upgrading its information systems. In 2004, the company expects to incur expenditures for design and construction of a new corporate headquarters building, while reducing capital spending on upgrading its information systems. In 2001, the company spent $3.3 million to purchase land for its future corporate headquarters. The remaining decrease in spending from 2001 to 2002 was a result of lower spending on software development and fewer warehouse relocations. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements The company uses an off balance sheet accounts receivable financing facility that expires in April 2005. Under the terms of the facility, O&M Funding, a wholly-owned, consolidated subsidiary, is entitled to sell, without recourse, up to $225 million of its trade receivables to a group of unrelated third party purchasers at a cost of funds based on either commercial paper rates, the Prime Rate, or LIBOR. The terms of the agreement require the company to maintain certain levels of net worth, current ratio, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, and restrict the company’s ability to materially alter the character of the business through consolidation, merger, or purchase or sale of assets. The company uses this facility as an economical means of financing, as the cost of selling accounts receivable is typically lower than the cost of interest for an equivalent amount of debt. However, due to the company’s favorable cash flow, it used the facility much less in 2003 than in 2002. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were no receivables sold under the Receivables Financing Facility. Critical Accounting Policies The company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of 14 revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The company continually evaluates the accounting policies and estimates it uses to prepare its financial statements. Management’s estimates are generally based on historical experience and various other assumptions that are judged to be reasonable in light of the relevant facts and circumstances. Because of the uncertainty inherent in such estimates, actual results may differ. Critical accounting policies are defined as those policies that relate to estimates that require a company to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made and could have a material impact on the company’s results due to changes in the estimate or the use of different estimates that could reasonably have been used. The company believes its critical accounting policies and estimates include its allowances for losses on accounts and notes receivable, inventory valuation and accounting for goodwill. Allowances for losses on accounts and notes receivable. The company maintains valuation allowances based upon the expected collectibility of accounts and notes receivable. The allowances include specific amounts for accounts that are likely to be uncollectible, such as customer bankruptcies and disputed amounts, and general allowances for accounts that may become uncollectible. These allowances are estimated based on many factors such as industry trends, current economic conditions, creditworthiness of customers, age of the receivables and changes in customer payment patterns. At December 31, 2003, the company had accounts and notes receivable of $353.4 million, net of allowances of $8.3 million. An unexpected bankruptcy or other adverse change in financial condition of a customer could result in increases in these allowances, which could have a material effect on net income. The company actively manages its accounts receivable to minimize credit risk. Inventory valuation. In order to state inventories at the lower of LIFO cost or market, the company maintains an allowance for obsolete and excess inventory based upon the expectation that some inventory will become obsolete and be sold for less than cost or become unsaleable altogether. The allowance is estimated based on factors such as age of the inventory and historical trends. At December 31, 2003, the company had inventory of $384.3 million, net of an allowance of $1.9 million. Changes in product specifications, customer product preferences or the loss of a customer could result in unanticipated impairment in net realizable value that may have a material impact on cost of goods sold, gross margin, and net income. The company actively manages its inventory levels to minimize the risk of loss and has consistently achieved a high level of inventory turnover. Goodwill. On January 1, 2002, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The provisions of SFAS 142 state that goodwill should not be amortized but should be tested for impairment upon adoption of the standard and, at least annually, at the reporting unit level. As a result, the company no longer records goodwill amortization expense. The company performs an impairment test of its goodwill based on its reporting units as defined in SFAS 142 on an annual basis. In performing the impairment test, the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using valuation techniques which can include multiples of the units’ earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), present value of expected cash flows and quoted market prices. The EBITDA multiples are based on an analysis of current market capitalizations and recent acquisition prices of similar companies. The fair value of each reporting unit is then compared to its carrying value to determine potential impairment. The company’s goodwill totaled $198.1 million at December 31, 2003. The impairment review required by SFAS 142 requires the extensive use of accounting judgment and financial estimates. The application of alternative assumptions, such as a change in discount rates or EBITDA multiples, or the testing for impairment at a different level of organization or on a different organization structure, could produce materially different results. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46R (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than 15 voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The Company will be required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in variable interest entities (VIEs) as of March 31, 2004. Management does not expect application of this Interpretation to have a material effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. Customer Risk The company is subject to risks associated with changes in the healthcare industry, including competition and continued efforts to control costs, which place pressure on operating earnings, changes in the way medical and surgical services are delivered, and changes in manufacturer preferences between the sale of product directly to hospital customers and the use of wholesale distribution. The loss of one of the company’s larger customers could have a significant effect on its business. Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this discussion constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although O&M believes its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied by these statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, including, but not limited to, general economic and business conditions; the ability of the company to implement its strategic initiatives; dependence on sales to certain customers; dependence on suppliers; changes in manufacturer terms and policies as well as preferences between direct sales and wholesale distribution; competition; changing trends in customer profiles; the ability of the company to meet customer demand for additional value added services; the ability to convert customers to CostTrackSM; the availability of supplier incentives; the ability to capitalize on buying opportunities; the ability of business partners to perform their contractual responsibilities; the ability to manage operating expenses; the ability of the company to manage financing costs and interest rate risk; the risk that a decline in business volume or profitability could result in an impairment of goodwill; the ability to timely or adequately respond to technological advances in the medical supply industry; the ability to successfully identify, manage or integrate possible future acquisitions; the costs associated with and outcome of outstanding and any future litigation, including product and professional liability claims; and changes in government regulations. As a result of these and other factors, no assurance can be given as to the company’s future results. The company is under no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results, or otherwise. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk O&M provides credit, in the normal course of business, to its customers. The company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains reserves for credit losses. The company is exposed to market risk relating to changes in interest rates. To manage this risk, O&M uses interest rate swaps to modify the company’s balance of fixed and variable rate financing. The company is exposed to certain losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to these swap agreements. However, O&M’s exposure is not significant and, since the counterparties are investment grade financial institutions, nonperformance is not anticipated. The company is exposed to market risk from both changes in interest rates related to its interest rate swaps and revolving credit facility, and changes in discount rates related to its Receivables Financing Facility. Interest expense and discount on accounts receivable securitization are subject to change as a result of movements in interest rates. As of December 31, 2003, O&M had $100 million of interest rate swaps on which the company pays a variable rate based on LIBOR and receives a fixed rate. A hypothetical increase in interest rates of 100 16 basis points would result in a potential reduction in future pre-tax earnings of approximately $1.0 million per year in connection with the swaps. The company had no outstanding financing under its Receivables Financing Facility at December 31, 2003. A hypothetical increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a potential reduction in future pre-tax earnings of approximately $0.1 million per year for every $10 million of outstanding financing under the Receivables Financing Facility. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data See Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. The company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the company required to be included in the company’s periodic SEC filings. There has been no change in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2003, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Items 10-14. Part III Information required by Items 10-14 can be found under “Corporate Officers” on page 15 of the Annual Report (or at the end of this electronic filing) and the registrant’s 2004 Proxy Statement pursuant to instructions (1) and G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K. 17 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: Part IV Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Independent Auditors’ Report Report of Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quarterly Financial Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 19 20 21 22 23 47 48 49 b) Reports on Form 8-K: The company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 2003, under Items 7 and 9, announcing its earnings for the third quarter ended September 30, 2003. c) Exhibits: See Index to Exhibits on page 50. 18 OWENS & MINOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in thousands, except per share data) Year ended December 31, 2003 2002 2001 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,244,067 3,798,073 $3,959,781 3,539,911 $3,814,994 3,406,758 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445,994 329,775 15,718 — — 100,501 8,958 757 157 (68) 2,898 87,799 34,158 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 53,641 $ Net income per common share - basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per common share - diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Cash dividends per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.52 1.42 0.35 419,870 307,015 15,926 — (487) 97,416 10,403 1,782 (84) — 7,034 78,281 31,014 47,267 1.40 1.27 0.31 $ $ $ $ 408,236 296,807 16,495 5,974 (1,476) 90,436 13,363 4,330 11,780 1,071 7,095 52,797 29,762 23,035 0.69 0.68 0.2725 $ $ $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 19 OWENS & MINOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except per share data) December 31, Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts and notes receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 16,335 353,431 384,266 27,343 781,375 21,088 198,063 — 45,222 $ 3,361 354,856 351,835 19,701 729,753 21,808 198,139 3,950 55,827 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,045,748 $1,009,477 Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Current liabilities Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued payroll and related liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 314,723 13,279 24,003 43,627 $ 259,597 12,985 20,369 51,779 Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust, holding solely convertible debentures of Owens & Minor, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395,632 209,499 — 2,350 27,912 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 635,393 344,730 240,185 125,150 — 27,975 738,040 Shareholders’ equity Preferred stock, par value $100 per share; authorized - 10,000 shares Series A; Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock; none issued . . . . . . . . . — — Common stock, par value $2 per share; authorized - 200,000 shares; issued and outstanding - 38,979 shares and 34,113 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,958 118,843 220,468 (6,914) Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410,355 68,226 30,134 179,554 (6,477) 271,437 Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,045,748 $1,009,477 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 20 OWENS & MINOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2003 2002 2001 Operating activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 53,641 Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating $ 47,267 $ 23,035 activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit Loss (gain) on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on investment Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for LIFO reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts and notes receivable, excluding sales of receivables . . . . . Net decrease in receivables sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in other current assets and current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net 15,718 — 157 (68) 10,216 3,306 2,778 (1,353) — (35,737) 52,626 (14,976) 6,036 (394) 2,954 15,926 (487) (84) — (8,002) 4,131 2,673 (23,294) (70,000) 33,538 (40,059) 14,702 353 6,534 2,540 22,469 (1,476) 11,780 1,071 11,268 4,264 2,347 5,323 (10,000) (78,198) 10,049 (4,664) 766 1,053 2,554 Cash provided by (used for) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,904 (14,262) 1,641 Investing activities Additions to property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions to computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net (6,597) (11,054) 520 (4,815) (4,942) 9 (10,147) (6,686) (858) Cash used for investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (17,131) (9,748) (17,691) Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Retirement of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from (payments on) revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in drafts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net — — (20,439) (10,884) (27,900) (12,727) 4,672 2,500 (21) — — (6,594) — 27,900 (10,567) 1,992 13,000 687 194,331 (158,594) — — (2,200) (9,182) 8,255 (14,900) (1,333) Cash provided by (used for) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (64,799) 26,418 16,377 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,974 3,361 2,408 953 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 16,335 $ 3,361 $ 327 626 953 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 21 OWENS & MINOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (in thousands, except per share data) Balance December 31, 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Unrealized gain on investment . . . . . Reclassification of unrealized loss to net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Minimum pension liability adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance December 31, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: Unrealized loss on investment Minimum pension liability . . . . . adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance December 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: Unrealized loss on investment . . . . . Reclassification of unrealized gain to net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Minimum pension liability adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Shares Outstanding Common Stock Paid-In Capital 33,180 $66,360 $ 18,039 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss $ (628) Total Shareholders’ Equity $212,772 23,035 Retained Earnings $129,001 23,035 55 110 696 (46) 1,392 (92) 813 (173) 9,237 (735) 33,885 67,770 27,181 (9,182) 142,854 47,267 272 642 (1,848) (1,562) (222) (4,693) 53 106 219 (44) 438 (88) 909 (62) 2,842 (736) 34,113 68,226 30,134 (10,567) 179,554 53,641 (6,477) (23) (41) (373) 5,059 (662) 10,118 (1,324) 92,279 (9,560) 73 146 539 (143) 1,078 (286) 1,129 (170) 7,938 (2,907) (12,727) 272 642 (1,848) 22,101 923 (173) (9,182) 10,629 (827) 236,243 47,267 (222) (4,693) 42,352 1,015 (62) (10,567) 3,280 (824) 271,437 53,641 (23) (41) (373) 53,204 102,397 (10,884) 1,275 (170) (12,727) 9,016 (3,193) Balance December 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . 38,979 $77,958 $118,843 $220,468 $(6,914) $410,355 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 22 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation. Owens & Minor, Inc. is the leading distributor of national name-brand medical and surgical supplies in the United States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Owens & Minor, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the company). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect amounts reported. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for the allowances for losses on accounts and notes receivable, inventory valuation allowances, depreciation and amortization, goodwill valuation, tax liabilities, and other contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and marketable securities with an original maturity or maturity at acquisition of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Accounts and Notes Receivable. Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The company maintains valuation allowances based upon the expected collectibility of accounts and notes receivable. The allowances include specific amounts for accounts that are likely to be uncollectible, such as customer bankruptcies and disputed amounts, and general allowances for accounts that may become uncollectible. The allowances are estimated based on many factors such as industry trends, current economic conditions, creditworthiness of customers, age of the receivables and changes in customer payment patterns. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Allowances for losses on accounts and notes receivable of $8.3 million and $6.8 million have been applied as reductions of accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Merchandise Inventories. The company’s merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories are valued on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost or, if acquired under capital leases, at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments or fair market value at the inception of the lease. Normal maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, and renovations and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation and amortization are provided for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, for capital leases and leasehold improvements, over the term of the lease, if shorter. In general, the estimated useful lives for computing depreciation and amortization are four to eight years for warehouse equipment and three to eight years for computer, office and other equipment. Straight- line and accelerated methods of depreciation are used for income tax purposes. Goodwill. On January 1, 2002, the company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The provisions of SFAS 142 state that goodwill should not be amortized but should be tested for impairment upon adoption of the standard, and at least annually, at the reporting unit level. As a result, the company no longer records goodwill amortization expense. The implementation provisions of SFAS 142 also require the company to evaluate its existing intangible assets and goodwill acquired in purchase business combinations, and to make any necessary reclassifications. At implementation, the company had no separately identifiable intangible assets from purchase business combinations that are recorded either separately or within goodwill. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years from the dates of acquisition and was evaluated for impairment based upon management’s assessment of undiscounted future cash flows, in 23 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) accordance with the provisions of SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of. Amortization expense related to goodwill for 2001 was $6.0 million. The following table presents the company’s net income for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001, adjusted to exclude goodwill amortization expense and related tax benefits: (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2003 2002 2001 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill amortization, net of tax benefit $53,641 — $47,267 — $23,035 5,328 Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $53,641 $47,267 $28,363 Per common share - basic: Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per common share - diluted: Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.52 1.42 $ $ 1.40 1.27 $ $ 0.85 0.81 Computer Software. The company develops and purchases software for internal use. Software development costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized. Once the software has been installed and tested and is ready for use, additional costs incurred in connection with the software are expensed as incurred. Capitalized computer software costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software, usually between three and five years. Computer software costs are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized software at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $22.2 million and $20.0 million. Depreciation and amortization expense includes $8.2 million, $7.7 million and $7.6 million of software amortization for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Investment. Until December 2003, the company held equity securities that were classified as available-for-sale, in accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and were included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Declines in market value that were considered other than temporary were reclassified to net income. Revenue Recognition. The company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price or fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The company records product revenue at the time of shipment. Distribution fee revenue, when calculated as a mark-up of the product cost, is also recognized at the time of shipment. Revenue for activity based distribution fees and other services is recognized once service has been rendered. The company provides for sales returns and allowances through a reduction in gross sales. This provision is based upon historical trends as well as specific identification of significant items. The company does not experience a significant volume of sales returns. In most cases, the company records revenue gross, as the company is the primary obligor in its sales arrangements and bears general and physical loss inventory risk. The company also has some discretion in supplier selection and carries all credit risk associated with its sales. From time to time, the company enters into arrangements where net revenue recognition is appropriate, and in these instances revenue is recognized accordingly. Stock-based Compensation. The company uses the intrinsic value method as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 to account for stock-based compensation. This method requires compensation 24 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) expense to be recognized for the excess of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date or the measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. In December 2002, the company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. The provisions of SFAS 148 amend the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, by requiring a tabular presentation of the effect on net income and earnings per share of using the fair value method, as defined in SFAS 123, to account for stock-based compensation. The following table presents the effect on net income and earnings per share had the company used the fair value method to account for stock-based compensation: (in thousands) Year Ended December 31, Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in 2003 2002 2001 $53,641 $47,267 $23,035 reported net income, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 674 572 464 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,787) (1,654) (1,672) Pro forma net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52,528 $46,185 $21,827 Per common share - basic: Net income, as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro forma net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per common share - diluted: Net income, as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro forma net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 1.52 1.49 1.42 1.39 $ $ $ $ 1.40 1.37 1.27 1.24 $ $ $ $ 0.69 0.65 0.68 0.64 The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $4.80, $4.49 and $5.37, per option. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants: dividend yield of 1.7%-2.6% in 2003, 1.6%-2.1% in 2002 and 1.4%-1.7% in 2001; expected volatility of 34.4%-36.9% in 2003, 39.1%-40.6% in 2002 and 41.4% in 2001; risk-free interest rate of 2.5%-2.9% in 2003, 3.0%-4.3% in 2002 and 4.4% in 2001; and expected lives of 4 years in 2003, 2002 and 2001. Other disclosures required by SFAS 123 are included in Note 12. Derivative Financial Instruments. On January 1, 2001, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. SFAS 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. The accounting treatment for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends upon the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the company’s results of operations or financial position. The company enters into interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The purpose of these swaps is to maintain the company’s desired mix of fixed to floating rate financing in order to manage interest rate risk. These swaps are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value, based on estimates of the prices obtained from a dealer. All of the company’s interest rate swaps since the implementation of SFAS 133 have been designated as hedges of the fair value of a portion of the company’s long-term debt and, accordingly, the changes in the fair value of the swaps and the changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized as a charge or credit to interest expense. The company assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the swaps are highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values of the hedged items. If it is determined that an interest rate swap has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. If an interest rate swap is 25 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) terminated, no gain or loss is recognized, since the swaps are recorded at fair value. However, the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to hedged risk is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item. If the hedged item is terminated prior to maturity, the interest rate swap, if not terminated at the same time, becomes an undesignated derivative and its subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in income. Operating Segments. As defined in SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as of December 31, 2003, the company had one operating segment. Other Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements. On January 1, 2003, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The provisions of SFAS 143 address financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. On January 1, 2003, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. The most significant provisions of SFAS 145 address the termination of extraordinary item treatment for gains and losses on early retirement of debt. As a result, effective January 1, 2003, the company presents gains and losses on early retirement of debt within income from continuing operations for current and prior periods. Adoption of this standard did not affect the company’s financial condition or results of operations but did change the presentation of the company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, and 2001 regarding the classification of gains and losses on early retirement of debt. On January 1, 2003, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The provisions of SFAS 146 modify the accounting for the costs of exit and disposal activities by requiring that liabilities for those activities be recognized when the liability is incurred. Previous accounting literature permitted recognition of some exit and disposal liabilities at the date of commitment to an exit plan. The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The company has not incurred any significant exit or disposal costs since the effective date of this statement. On July 1, 2003, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies the financial accounting and reporting requirements, originally established in SFAS 133, for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 149 provides greater clarification of the characteristics of a derivative instrument so that contracts with similar characteristics will be accounted for consistently. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, as well as for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not affect the company’s financial position or results of operations. On July 1, 2003, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. The provisions of SFAS 150 modify the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity by requiring that they be classified as liabilities. As a result, effective July 1, 2003, the company began presenting the distributions on its mandatorily redeemable preferred securities as interest expense on the company’s consolidated statements of income. Although adoption of the standard changed financial statement presentation, it did not affect the company’s financial condition or results of operations. In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB 26 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor, in its interim and annual financial statements, about its obligations under guarantees issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation were applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The application of this Interpretation affected some disclosures, but did not have a material effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51. This Interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. For variable interests in a variable interest entity created before February 1, 2003, the Interpretation is applicable as of December 31, 2003. The application of this Interpretation did not have a material effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. The revised standard requires disclosures in addition to those in the original SFAS 132 about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. Most of the additional disclosure requirements are effective for the company as of December 31, 2003, with the remaining requirements effective as of December 31, 2004. The adoption of the revised standard did not affect the company’s financial condition or results of operations. The company’s disclosures in Note 13 incorporate the new requirements of this statement. Note 2—Acquisition On July 30, 1999, the company acquired certain net assets of Medix, Inc. (Medix), a distributor of medical and surgical supplies. In connection with the acquisition, management adopted a plan for integration of the businesses that included closure of some Medix facilities and consolidation of certain administrative functions. An accrual was established to provide for certain costs of this plan. The integration accrual was re-evaluated in 2003, 2002 and 2001, resulting in reductions in the accrual of $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.6 million. The accrual adjustments were recorded as reductions in goodwill, as they reduced the purchase price of the Medix acquisition. The following table sets forth the major components of the accrual and activity through December 31, 2003: (in thousands) Losses under lease commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee separations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exit Plan Provision $1,643 395 685 $2,723 Charges Adjustments $1,094 350 427 $1,871 $(549) (45) (218) $(812) Balance at December 31, 2003 $— — 40 $ 40 The employee separations relate to severance costs for employees in operations and activities that were exited. Approximately 40 employees were terminated. While the integration of the Medix business was completed in 2001, the company continues to make payments under certain obligations. Note 3—Restructuring In 1998, the company recorded a nonrecurring restructuring charge of $11.2 million as a result of the cancellation of a significant medical/surgical distribution contract. The restructuring plan included reductions in warehouse space and in the number of employees in those facilities that had the highest volume of business under that contract. The company periodically re-evaluates its estimate of the remaining costs to be incurred and, as a 27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) result, reduced the accrual by $0.1 million in 2003, $0.5 million in 2002, and $1.5 million in 2001. These adjustments resulted primarily from the reutilization of warehouse space that had previously been vacated under the restructuring plan and the resolution of uncertainties related to potential asset write-offs. Approximately 130 employees were terminated in connection with the restructuring plan. The following table sets forth the activity in the restructuring accrual through December 31, 2003: (in thousands) Restructuring Provision Charges Adjustments Balance at December 31, 2003 Losses under lease commitments . . . . . . . . . . . Asset write-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee separations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,194 3,968 2,497 541 $11,200 $3,621 2,012 1,288 99 $7,020 $ (159) (1,956) (1,209) (442) $(3,766) $414 — — — $414 Note 4—Merchandise Inventories The company’s merchandise inventories are valued on a LIFO basis. If LIFO inventories had been valued on a current cost or first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, they would have been greater by $43.3 million and $40.0 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002. Note 5—Property and Equipment The company’s investment in property and equipment consists of the following: (in thousands) December 31, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse equipment Computer equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Land and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 $ 26,934 36,808 13,639 12,082 5,681 $ 25,665 36,598 13,094 11,716 5,263 95,144 92,336 Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (74,056) (70,528) Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,088 $ 21,808 Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment in 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $7.5 million, $8.2 million, and $8.9 million. Note 6—Investment Until December 2003, the company owned equity securities of a provider of business-to-business e-commerce services to the healthcare industry. The company sold this investment in December 2003, for a gain of $68 thousand. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2001, included an impairment charge of $1.1 million, as the market value of these securities fell significantly below the company’s original cost basis and management believed that recovery in the near term was unlikely. As of December 31, 2002, the fair value (based on the quoted market price), gross unrealized gains, and adjusted cost basis of the investment was $257 thousand, $106 thousand, and $151 thousand. 28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Note 7—Accounts Payable Accounts payable balances were $314.7 million and $259.6 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, of which $272.2 million and $219.6 million were trade accounts payable and $42.5 million and $40.0 million, were drafts payable. Drafts payable are checks written in excess of bank balances to be funded upon clearing the bank. Note 8—Debt The company’s long-term debt consists of the following: (in thousands) December 31, 2003 2002 Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value 8.5% Senior Subordinated Notes, $200 million par value, mature July 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $209,364 $219,500 $212,285 $213,250 Revolving Credit Facility with interest based on London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), Federal Funds Rate or Prime Rate, expires April 2005, credit limit of $150 million . . . . . . . . Capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 194 — 194 27,900 — Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209,558 (59) 219,694 (59) 240,185 — 27,900 — 241,150 — Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $209,499 $219,635 $240,185 $241,150 In July 2001, the company issued $200.0 million of 8.5% Senior Subordinated 10-year notes (2011 Notes) which mature on July 15, 2011. Interest on the 2011 Notes is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15, beginning January 15, 2002. The 2011 Notes are redeemable on or after July 15, 2006, at the company’s option, subject to certain restrictions. The 2011 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all significant subsidiaries of the company, other than O&M Funding Corp. (OMF) and Owens & Minor Trust I. Under these guarantees, the guarantor subsidiaries would be required to pay up to the full balance of the debt in the event of default of Owens & Minor, Inc. The net proceeds from the 2011 Notes were used to retire the 10.875% Senior Subordinated 10-year Notes due in 2006 (2006 Notes) and to reduce the amount of outstanding financing under the company’s off balance sheet receivable financing facility. The early retirement of the 2006 Notes in 2001 resulted in a loss on early retirement of debt of $11.8 million, consisting of $8.4 million of retirement premiums, a $3.2 million write-off of debt issuance costs, and $0.2 million of fees. In April 2002, the company replaced its revolving credit facility with a new agreement expiring in April 2005. The credit limit of the new facility is $150.0 million, and the interest rate is based on, at the company’s discretion, LIBOR, the Federal Funds Rate or the Prime Rate. Under the new facility, the company is charged a commitment fee of between 0.30% and 0.40% on the unused portion of the facility, and a utilization fee of 0.25% if borrowings exceed $75.0 million. The terms of the new agreement limit the amount of indebtedness that the company may incur, require the company to maintain certain levels of net worth, current ratio, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, and restrict the ability of the company to materially alter the character of the business through consolidation, merger, or purchase or sale of assets. Net interest expense includes finance charge income of $5.2 million, $4.2 million and $4.5 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001. Finance charge income represents charges to customers for past due balances on their accounts. Cash payments for interest expense during 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $13.3 million, $14.9 million and 29 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) $10.8 million. In 2003, $0.2 million of interest cost was capitalized relating to long-term capital projects, including design and construction of a new corporate headquarters and development of information systems infrastructure. No interest cost was capitalized in 2002 or 2001. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based on the borrowing rates currently available to the company for loans with similar terms and average maturities. As of December 31, 2003, the company had no long-term debt due within the next five years. The future minimum capital lease payments, net of interest, for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2003, are $59 thousand in 2004, $67 thousand in 2005, $65 thousand in 2006, $3 thousand in 2007, and none in 2008. Note 9—Off Balance Sheet Receivables Financing Facility In April 2002, the company replaced its off balance sheet receivables financing facility (Receivables Financing Facility) with a new agreement expiring in April 2005. Under the terms of the new facility, O&M Funding is entitled to sell, without recourse, up to $225.0 million of its trade receivables to a group of unrelated third party purchasers at a cost of funds based on either commercial paper rates, the Prime Rate, or LIBOR. The terms of the agreement require the company to maintain certain levels of net worth, current ratio, leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, and restrict the company’s ability to materially alter the character of the business through consolidation, merger, or purchase or sale of assets. The company continues to service the receivables that are transferred under the facility on behalf of the purchasers at estimated market rates. Accordingly, the company has not recognized a servicing asset or liability. In the second quarter of 2001, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of SFAS 125 of the same title. SFAS 140 revised the standards for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and expanded the disclosure requirements for such transactions, while carrying over many of the provisions of SFAS 125 without change. The provisions of SFAS 140 are effective for transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001, and are to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this standard did not require a change in the company’s accounting treatment of sales of accounts receivable under its Receivables Financing Facility, or have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 140 in 2000. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were no receivables sold under the Receivables Financing Facility. Note 10—Derivative Financial Instruments The company enters into interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The purpose of these swaps is to maintain the company’s desired mix of fixed to floating rate financing in order to manage interest rate risk. In July 2001, the company entered into interest rate swap agreements of $100.0 million notional amounts that effectively converted a portion of the company’s fixed rate financing instruments to variable rates. These swaps were designated as fair value hedges of a portion of the company’s 2011 Notes and, as the terms of the swaps are identical to the terms of the Notes, qualify for an assumption of no ineffectiveness under the provisions of SFAS 133. Under these agreements, expiring in July 2011, the company pays the counterparties a variable rate based on LIBOR and the counterparties pay the company a fixed interest rate of 8.5%. Previously, the company had similar interest rate swap agreements of $100.0 million notional amounts that were designated as fair value hedges of a portion of the company’s 2006 Notes. These swaps were cancelled by their respective counterparties on May 28, 2001. Under these agreements, the company paid the counterparties a variable rate based on LIBOR and the counterparties paid the company a fixed interest rate ranging from 7.35% to 7.38%. The payments received or disbursed in connection with the interest rate swaps are included in interest expense, net. Based on estimates of the prices obtained from a dealer, the fair value of the company’s interest rate 30 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) swaps at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $8.8 million and $11.6 million, net of accrued interest. The fair value of the swaps was recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The company is exposed to certain losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to these swap agreements. However, the company’s exposure is not material and, since the counterparties are investment grade financial institutions, nonperformance is not anticipated. Note 11—Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities In May 1998, Owens & Minor Trust I (Trust), a statutory business trust sponsored and wholly owned by Owens & Minor, Inc. (O&M), issued 2,640,000 shares of $2.6875 Term Convertible Securities, Series A (Securities), for aggregate proceeds of $132.0 million. Each Security had a liquidation value of $50. The net proceeds were invested by the Trust in 5.375% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures of O&M (Debentures). The Debentures were the sole assets of the Trust. O&M applied substantially all of the net proceeds of the Debentures to repurchase 1,150,000 shares of its Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock at its par value. The Securities accrued and paid quarterly cash distributions at an annual rate of 5.375% of the liquidation value. Each Security was convertible into 2.4242 shares of the common stock of O&M at the holder’s option prior to May 1, 2013. The Securities were mandatorily redeemable upon the maturity of the Debentures on April 30, 2013, and could be redeemed by the company in whole or in part after May 1, 2001. The obligations of the Trust, as provided under the term of the Securities, were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by O&M. In 2002, the company announced a $50 million repurchase plan for a combination of its common stock and its Securities. Under the plan, the company repurchased 137,000 Securities in 2002 and an additional 415,984 Securities in 2003. During the third quarter of 2003, the company initiated and completed the redemption of all the remaining Securities. As a result, Securities with a liquidation amount of $104.4 million were converted into 5.1 million shares of Owens & Minor common stock and Securities with a liquidation amount of $27 thousand were redeemed at a redemption price of 102.0156 percent of the liquidation amount. The repurchases and redemptions resulted in a gain of $84 thousand in 2002 and a loss of $157 thousand in 2003. The estimated fair value, based on quoted market prices, and carrying amount of the Securities was $123.3 million and $125.2 million at December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002, the company had accrued $1.1 million of distributions related to the Securities. Note 12—Stock-based Compensation The company maintains stock-based compensation plans (Plans) that provide for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted common stock and common stock. The Plans are administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors and allow the company to award or grant to officers, directors and employees incentive, non-qualified and deferred compensation stock options, SARs and restricted and unrestricted stock. At December 31, 2003, approximately 0.9 million common shares were available for issuance under the Plans. Stock options awarded under the Plans generally vest over three years and expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. The options are granted at a price equal to fair market value at the date of grant. Restricted stock awarded under the Plans generally vests over three or five years. At December 31, 2003, there were no SARs outstanding. The company has a Management Equity Ownership Program. This program requires each of the company’s officers to own the company’s common stock at specified levels, which gradually increase over five years. Officers who meet specified ownership goals in a given year are awarded restricted stock under the provisions of 31 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) the program. The company also has an Annual Incentive Plan. Under the plan, certain employees may be awarded restricted stock based on pre-established objectives. Upon issuance of restricted shares, unearned compensation is charged to shareholders’ equity for the market value of restricted stock and recognized as compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, the company issued 76 thousand, 53 thousand and 72 thousand shares of restricted stock, at weighted-average market values of $17.45, $19.21 and $15.79. Amortization of unearned compensation for restricted stock awards was approximately $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $0.8 million for 2003, 2002 and 2001. The following table summarizes the activity and terms of outstanding options at December 31, 2003, and for the years in the three-year period then ended: (in thousands, except per share data) . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding at beginning of year Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired/cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 2001 Average Exercise Price $13.83 18.66 13.48 16.85 Options 2,371 362 (539) (10) Average Exercise Price $13.46 15.26 12.51 14.64 Options 2,219 378 (219) (7) Average Exercise Price $12.82 16.03 13.01 11.56 Options 2,503 480 (696) (68) Outstanding at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,184 $14.71 2,371 $13.83 2,219 $13.46 Exercisable options at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,542 $13.78 1,642 $13.68 1,413 $13.56 At December 31, 2003, the following option groups were outstanding: Outstanding Exercisable Number of Options (000’s) 259 1,057 473 395 2,184 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 8.91 $14.07 $15.86 $18.83 $14.71 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Number of Options (000’s) 5.80 4.25 3.83 6.85 4.81 259 853 337 93 1,542 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 8.91 $13.88 $15.84 $18.99 $13.78 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 5.80 4.05 3.64 8.55 4.52 Range of Exercise Prices $ 8.31 - 12.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12.01 - 15.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15.01 - 18.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18.01 - 24.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Note 13—Retirement Plans Savings and Protection Plan. The company maintains a voluntary 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan covering substantially all full-time employees who have completed one month of service and have attained age 18. The company matches a certain percentage of each employee’s contribution. The plan provides for a minimum contribution by the company to the plan for all eligible employees of 1% of their salary, subject to certain limits. This contribution can be increased at the company’s discretion. The company incurred approximately $3.3 million, $3.1 million and $3.0 million of expenses related to this plan in 2003, 2002 and 2001. Pension Plan. The company has a noncontributory pension plan covering substantially all employees who had earned benefits as of December 31, 1996. On that date, substantially all of the benefits of employees under this plan were frozen, with all participants becoming fully vested. The company expects to continue to fund the plan based on federal requirements, amounts deductible for income tax purposes and as needed to ensure that plan assets are sufficient to satisfy plan liabilities. The company contributed $2.4 million to the plan in 2003 and does not expect to make a contribution in 2004. 32 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The company invests the assets of the pension plan in order to achieve an adequate rate of return to satisfy the obligations of the plan while keeping long-term risk to an acceptable level. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the plan consisted of the following types of investments, compared to the target allocation: December 31, Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 Target 73% 72% 71% 23% 23% 24% 4% 5% 5% 100% 100% 100% As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, plan assets included 34,444 shares of the company’s common stock, representing 3% of total plan assets in 2003 and 2002. Retirement Plan. The company also has a noncontributory, unfunded retirement plan for certain officers and other key employees. Benefits are based on a percentage of the employees’ compensation. The following table sets forth the plans’ financial status and the amounts recognized in the company’s consolidated balance sheets: (in thousands) December 31, Pension Plan Retirement Plan 2003 2002 2003 2002 Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,077 — 1,650 2,382 (1,216) $22,668 — 1,599 1,890 (1,080) $ 18,468 846 1,232 2,818 (294) $ 14,717 599 1,055 2,340 (243) Benefit obligation, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,893 $25,077 $ 23,070 $ 18,468 Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,197 4,068 2,441 (1,216) $21,454 (3,177) — (1,080) $ — — 294 (294) $ — — 243 (243) Fair value of plan assets, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22,490 $17,197 $ — $ — Funded status Funded status at December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5,403) 9,292 — $ (7,880) 9,876 — $(23,070) 8,348 2,409 $(18,468) 5,898 2,691 Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,889 $ 1,996 $(12,313) $ (9,879) Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets Accrued benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5,403) — 9,292 $ (7,880) — 9,876 $(16,764) 2,409 2,042 $(13,416) 2,691 846 Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,889 $ 1,996 $(12,313) $ (9,879) Accumulated benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation $27,893 $25,077 $ 16,764 $ 13,416 Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.10% n/a 6.75% n/a 6.10% 5.50% 6.75% 5.50% 33 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The components of net periodic pension cost for the Pension and Retirement Plans are as follows: (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2003 2002 2001 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of transition obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 846 2,882 (1,458) 282 — 726 $ 599 2,654 (1,759) 281 41 209 $ 760 2,396 (2,130) 282 41 56 Net periodic pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,278 $ 2,025 $ 1,405 Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.75% 7.25% 6.75-7.75% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 7.00% 7.00% 8.50% To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the company considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. The assumption also takes into account expenses that are paid directly by the plan. All measurements of the pension plan assets and benefit obligations are as of December 31, except for the real estate investments which are measured as of September 30. Note 14—Income Taxes The income tax provision consists of the following: (in thousands) Year ended December 31, Current tax provision: 2003 2002 2001 Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,845 3,097 23,942 $33,639 5,377 $14,851 3,643 39,016 18,494 Deferred tax provision (benefit): Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred provision (benefit) 9,168 1,048 10,216 (7,181) (821) (8,002) 9,859 1,409 11,268 Total income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,158 $31,014 $29,762 A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the company’s effective income tax rate is shown below: Year ended December 31, Federal statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases in the rate resulting from: State income taxes, net of federal income tax impact . . . . . . . . Provision for COLI contingency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nondeductible goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effective rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 2002 2001 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 3.3 3.7 — — — — 0.6 0.9 38.9% 39.6% 56.4% 4.8 13.6 2.9 0.1 34 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below: (in thousands) Year ended December 31, Deferred tax assets: 2003 2002 Allowance for losses on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued liabilities not currently deductible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,508 6,569 934 10,292 1,303 $ 1,844 6,518 1,113 10,952 1,899 Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,606 22,326 Deferred tax liabilities: Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,434 5,918 6,053 2,554 46,959 28,540 4,322 3,741 2,142 38,745 Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(26,353) $(16,419) Cash payments for income taxes for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $33.1 million, $34.4 million and $23.5 million. In August 2000, the company received notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that it had disallowed certain prior years’ deductions for interest on loans associated with the company’s corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) program for the years 1995 to 1998. Management believed that the company complied with the tax law as it relates to its COLI program, and filed an appeal with the Internal Revenue Service. However, several cases involving other corporations’ COLI programs were decided in favor of the IRS, and consequently, the climate became less favorable to taxpayers with respect to these programs. As a result, an income tax provision for the estimated liability of $7.2 million for taxes and interest was recorded in 2001 as management believed that it had become probable that the company would not achieve a favorable resolution of this matter. In October 2003, the company signed a Closing Agreement with the IRS, settling the company’s liability. At that time, the company terminated and surrendered the COLI policies at issue. 35 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Note 15—Net Income Per Common Share The following sets forth the computation of net income per basic and diluted common share: (in thousands, except per share data) Year ended December 31, Numerator: 2003 2002 2001 Numerator for net income per basic common share - net income . . . . . . . . . . Distributions on convertible mandatorily redeemable preferred securities, $53,641 $47,267 $23,035 net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,362 4,220 4,257 Numerator for net income per diluted common share - net income attributable to common stock after assumed conversions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $56,003 $51,487 $27,292 Denominator: Denominator for net income per basic common share - weighted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,204 33,799 33,368 Effect of dilutive securities: Conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . Stock options and restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,518 611 6,383 516 6,400 619 Denominator for net income per diluted common share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,333 40,698 40,387 $ Net income per basic common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per diluted common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.52 1.42 $ $ 1.40 1.27 $ $ 0.69 0.68 During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, outstanding options to purchase approximately 15 thousand, 65 thousand and 27 thousand common shares were excluded from the calculation of net income per diluted common share because their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the common stock for the year. Note 16—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of the following: (in thousands) Unrealized Gain on Investment Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Balance December 31, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002 change, gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax benefit Balance December 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2003 change, gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax benefit $ 286 (370) 148 64 (106) 42 $(1,848) (7,641) 2,948 (6,541) (612) 239 $(1,562) (8,011) 3,096 (6,477) (718) 281 Balance December 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $(6,914) $(6,914) 36 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Note 17—Shareholders’ Equity The company has a shareholder rights agreement under which 8/27ths of a Right is attendant to each outstanding share of common stock of the company. Each full Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the company one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred Stock), at an exercise price of $75 (the Purchase Price). The Rights will become exercisable, if not earlier redeemed, only if a person or group acquires 20% or more of the outstanding shares of the company’s common stock or announces a tender offer, the consummation of which would result in ownership by a person or group of 20% or more of such outstanding shares. Each holder of a Right, upon the occurrence of certain events, will become entitled to receive, upon exercise and payment of the Purchase Price, Series A Preferred Stock (or in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of the company or a potential acquirer) having a value equal to twice the amount of the Purchase Price. The Rights will expire on April 30, 2004, if not earlier redeemed. The company has adopted a new shareholder rights agreement that will replace the current shareholder rights agreement upon its expiration on April 30, 2004. Under the new shareholder rights agreement, one Right will be attendant to each outstanding share of common stock of the company. Each Right will entitle the registered holder to purchase from the company one one-thousandth of a share of a new Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (New Series A Preferred Stock) at an exercise price of $100 (New Purchase Price). The Rights will become exercisable, if not earlier redeemed, only if a person or group acquires more than 15% of the outstanding shares of the company’s common stock or if the company’s Board of Directors so determines following the commencement of a public announcement of a tender or exchange offer, the consummation of which would result in ownership by a person or group of more than 15% of such outstanding shares. Each holder of a Right, upon the occurrence of certain events, will become entitled to receive, upon exercise and payment of the New Purchase Price, New Series A Preferred Stock (or in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of the Company or a potential acquirer) having a value equal to twice the amount of the New Purchase Price. The Rights will expire on April 30, 2014, if not earlier redeemed. Note 18—Commitments and Contingencies The company has a commitment through July 31, 2009 to outsource its information technology operations, including the management and operation of its mainframe computer and distributed services processing, as well as application support, development and enhancement services. The commitment is cancelable for convenience after August 1, 2005 with 180 days notice and payment of a termination fee. The termination fee is based upon certain costs which would be incurred by the vendor as a direct result of the early termination of the agreement. The maximum termination fee payable is $9.1 million after the third contract year, which ends July 31, 2005. The termination fee declines each year to $2.3 million at the end of the sixth contract year, which ends July 31, 2008. Assuming no early termination of the contract, the fixed and determinable portion of the obligations under this agreement is $29.7 million per year from 2004 through 2008, and $17.3 million in 2009, totaling $165.8 million. These obligations can vary annually up to a certain level for changes in the Consumer Price Index or for a significant increase in the company’s medical/surgical distribution business. Additionally, the service fees under this contract can vary to the extent additional services are provided by the vendor which are not covered by the negotiated base fees, or as a result of reduction in services that were included in these base fees. The company has a non-cancelable agreement through September 2004 to receive support and upgrades for certain computer software. Future minimum payments under this agreement for 2004 are $0.4 million. The company has entered into non-cancelable agreements to lease most of its office and warehouse facilities with remaining terms generally ranging from one to six years. Certain leases include renewal options, generally for five-year increments. The company also leases most of its trucks and material handling equipment for terms 37 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) generally ranging from four to seven years. At December 31, 2003, future minimum annual payments under non- cancelable operating lease agreements with original terms in excess of one year are as follows: (in thousands) 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Later years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $25,246 18,994 13,233 7,597 4,520 2,786 Total minimum payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $72,376 Rent expense for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $34.0 million, $32.9 million and $31.1 million. The company has limited concentrations of credit risk with respect to financial instruments. Temporary cash investments are placed with high credit quality institutions and concentrations within accounts and notes receivable are limited due to their geographic dispersion. Net sales to member hospitals under contract with Novation totaled $2.1 billion in 2003, $2.0 billion in 2002 and $1.9 billion in 2001, approximately 49%, 50% and 51% of the company’s net sales. As members of a group purchasing organization, Novation members have an incentive to purchase from their primary selected distributor; however, they operate independently and are free to negotiate directly with distributors and manufacturers. Net sales to member hospitals under contract with Broadlane totaled $0.6 billion in 2003, $0.5 billion in 2002 and $0.4 billion in 2001, approximately 15%, 14% and 11% of the company’s net sales. Note 19— Legal Proceedings In addition to commitments and obligations in the ordinary course of business, the company is subject to various legal actions that are ordinary and incidental to its business, including contract disputes, employment, workers’ compensation, product liability, regulatory and other matters. The company establishes reserves from time to time based upon periodic assessment of the potential outcomes of pending matters. In addition, the company believes that any potential liability arising from employment, product liability, workers’ compensation and other personal injury litigation matters would be adequately covered by the company’s insurance coverage, subject to policy limits, applicable deductibles and insurer solvency. While the outcome of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, the company believes, based on current knowledge and the advice of counsel, that the outcome of currently pending matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. Note 20—Condensed Consolidating Financial Information The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for: Owens & Minor, Inc.; on a combined basis, the guarantors of Owens & Minor, Inc.’s 2011 Notes; and the non-guarantor subsidiaries of the 2011 Notes. Separate financial statements of the guarantor subsidiaries are not presented because the guarantors are jointly, severally and unconditionally liable under the guarantees and the company believes the condensed consolidating financial information is more meaningful in understanding the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the guarantor subsidiaries. 38 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2003 Statements of Operations Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense (income), net . . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on early retirement of debt Gain on investment Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated $ — $4,244,067 3,798,073 — — 587 — (587) (9,265) — 157 (68) — 8,589 3,342 445,994 328,061 15,718 102,215 24,415 21 — — — 77,779 30,260 $ — — — 1,127 — (1,127) (6,192) 736 — — 2,898 1,431 556 $— — — — — — — — — — — — — $4,244,067 3,798,073 445,994 329,775 15,718 100,501 8,958 757 157 (68) 2,898 87,799 34,158 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,247 $ 47,519 $ 875 $— $ 53,641 39 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2002 Statements of Operations Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense (income), net . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany dividend income . . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on early retirement of debt Distributions on mandatorily redeemable — 3 — — (3) (14,651) (44,999) — (84) Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated $ — $3,959,781 3,539,911 — $ — — $ — $3,959,781 3,539,911 — 419,870 — 303,916 15,926 (487) 100,515 37,627 — 3,096 — — (3,096) (12,573) — 13 — — 1,769 — 7,034 674 655 19 — — — — — — 44,999 — — — (44,999) — 419,870 307,015 15,926 (487) 97,416 10,403 — 1,782 (84) 7,034 78,281 31,014 $(44,999) $ 47,267 preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,731 5,764 62,875 24,595 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 53,967 $ 38,280 $ 40 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2001 Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated Statements of Operations Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $3,814,994 3,406,758 — $ — — $ — $3,814,994 3,406,758 — Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense (income), net Intercompany dividend income . . . . . . . . . . Discount on accounts receivable securitization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . Loss on investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions on mandatorily redeemable — — — — — — 1,849 (127,857) — 11,780 1,071 preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 408,236 296,072 16,495 5,974 (1,476) 91,171 29,998 — 13 — — — Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . 113,157 (5,717) 61,160 32,677 — 735 — — — — — — — — (735) (18,484) — — — 127,857 4,317 — — 7,095 6,337 2,802 — — — — (127,857) — 408,236 296,807 16,495 5,974 (1,476) 90,436 13,363 — 4,330 11,780 1,071 7,095 52,797 29,762 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 118,874 $ 28,483 $ 3,535 $(127,857) $ 23,035 41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) December 31, 2003 Balance Sheets Assets Current assets Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts and notes receivable, net . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany advances, net Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets, net $ 14,156 — — 126,182 18 140,356 — — 383,415 13,624 $ 2,178 5,985 384,266 186,302 27,325 606,056 21,088 198,063 22,773 31,598 $ $ 1 347,446 — (312,484) — 34,963 — — — — — $ — — — — — — — 16,335 353,431 384,266 — 27,343 781,375 21,088 198,063 — 45,222 (406,188) — Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $537,395 $879,578 $ 34,963 $(406,188) $1,045,748 Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Current liabilities Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued payroll and related liabilities . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $314,723 13,279 24,003 37,535 — — 6,030 $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,030 209,364 — — — 389,540 135 138,890 2,350 27,912 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215,394 558,827 — — — 62 62 — — — — 62 Shareholders’ equity Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive 77,958 118,843 125,200 — 249,797 77,868 1,500 16,001 17,400 loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (6,914) — $ — $ 314,723 13,279 — 24,003 — 43,627 — — — (138,890) — — (138,890) (1,500) (265,798) — — 395,632 209,499 — 2,350 27,912 635,393 77,958 118,843 220,468 (6,914) Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . 322,001 320,751 34,901 (267,298) 410,355 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $537,395 $879,578 $ 34,963 $(406,188) $1,045,748 42 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) December 31, 2002 Balance Sheets Assets Current assets Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts and notes receivable, net . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany advances, net Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets, net $ 1,244 — — 196,804 21 198,069 — — 387,498 — 20,835 $ 2,116 3,592 351,835 119,253 19,680 496,476 21,808 198,139 22,773 3,950 34,992 $ $ 1 351,264 — (316,057) — 35,208 — — 129,233 — — — $ — — — — — — — 3,361 354,856 351,835 — 19,701 729,753 21,808 198,139 — 3,950 55,827 (539,504) — — Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $606,402 $778,138 $ 164,441 $(539,504) $1,009,477 Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Current liabilities Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued payroll and related liabilities . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $259,597 12,985 20,369 44,717 — — 5,880 $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust, holding solely convertible debentures of Owens & Minor, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,880 240,185 337,668 — — 129,233 — — 188,890 27,975 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375,298 554,533 Shareholders’ equity Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive 68,226 30,134 132,680 — 199,797 30,349 $ — — — 1,182 1,182 — — $ 259,597 12,985 — 20,369 — 51,779 — — — 344,730 240,185 125,150 — — 126,332 5,583 16,001 16,525 — (318,123) — (318,123) (5,583) (215,798) — — 125,150 — 27,975 738,040 68,226 30,134 179,554 (6,477) income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 (6,541) — Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . 231,104 223,605 38,109 (221,381) 271,437 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $606,402 $778,138 $ 164,441 $(539,504) $1,009,477 43 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2003 Statements of Cash Flows Operating Activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for LIFO reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in other current assets and current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . Investing Activities Additions to property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . Additions to computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in intercompany debt Increase in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash provided by (used for) investing Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated $ 5,247 $ 47,519 $ 875 $ — $ 53,641 — 157 (68) — — — — — — 153 982 — 2,372 8,843 — — (45,917) 50,000 218 15,718 — — 10,216 3,306 1,675 (4,068) (35,737) 52,626 (14,516) 5,054 (394) 582 81,981 (6,597) (11,054) — — 302 — — — — — 1,103 2,715 — — (613) — — — 4,080 — — — 4,083 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 45,917 (54,083) — 15,718 157 (68) 10,216 3,306 2,778 (1,353) (35,737) 52,626 (14,976) 6,036 (394) 2,954 94,904 — (6,597) (11,054) — — 520 activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,301 (17,349) 4,083 (8,166) (17,131) Financing Activities Repurchase of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net payments on revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . Payments on intercompany debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in intercompany advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . Increase in drafts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (20,439) (10,884) (27,900) (4,083) 71,129 — (12,727) 4,672 — — — — — (50,000) (67,049) 50,000 — — 2,500 (21) Cash used for financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . (232) (64,570) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of 12,912 62 year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,244 2,116 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . $ 14,156 $ 2,178 $ 44 — — — — (4,080) (4,083) — — — — (8,163) — 1 1 — — — 54,083 — (45,917) — — — — 8,166 — — (20,439) (10,884) (27,900) — — — (12,727) 4,672 2,500 (21) (64,799) 12,974 3,361 $ — $ 16,335 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2002 Statements of Cash Flows Operating Activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for LIFO reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts and notes receivable, excluding sales of receivables . . . . . . . Net decrease in receivables sold . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in other current assets and current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,365) 530 — 1,515 Cash provided by (used for) operating Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated $ 53,967 $ 38,280 $ 19 $(44,999) $ 47,267 — — (84) 759 — — — — — — 15,926 (487) — (10,809) 4,131 600 (4,192) — 33,538 (40,059) 16,201 (177) 6,534 23 — — — 2,048 — 2,073 (19,102) (70,000) — — (134) — — 1,002 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 15,926 (487) (84) (8,002) 4,131 2,673 (23,294) (70,000) 33,538 (40,059) 14,702 353 6,534 2,540 activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,322 59,509 (84,094) (44,999) (14,262) Investing Activities Additions to property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . Additions to computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in intercompany debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — (45,000) (1) — (4,815) (4,942) — — 9 Cash used for investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . (45,001) (9,748) Financing Activities Repurchase of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from revolving credit facility . . . . . . Net proceeds from issuance of intercompany debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in intercompany advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . Increase in drafts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash provided by (used for) financing (6,594) 27,900 — (23,002) — (10,567) — 1,992 — 687 — — 45,000 (61,092) 1 — (44,999) — 13,000 — — — — — — — — — — 84,094 — — — — — — activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9,584) (48,090) 84,094 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737 507 1,671 445 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . $ 1,244 $ 2,116 $ — 1 1 — — 45,000 1 — 45,001 — — (45,000) — (1) — 44,999 — — — (2) — — (4,815) (4,942) — — 9 (9,748) (6,594) 27,900 — — — (10,567) — 1,992 13,000 687 26,418 2,408 953 $ — $ 3,361 45 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2001 Statements of Cash Flows Operating Activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on early retirement of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on investment Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for LIFO reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts and notes receivable, excluding sales of receivables . . . . . . . Net decrease in receivables sold . . . . . . . Merchandise inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in other current assets and current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owens & Minor, Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated $ 118,874 $ 28,483 $ 3,535 $(127,857) $ 23,035 — — 11,780 1,071 256 — — — — — — 5,524 1,411 — 1,689 22,469 (1,476) — — 10,816 4,264 — — — — 196 — 2,865 (518) 21,359 — (78,198) 10,049 (10,112) (645) 1,053 840 (16,036) (10,000) — — (76) — — 25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 22,469 (1,476) 11,780 1,071 11,268 4,264 2,347 5,323 (10,000) (78,198) 10,049 (4,664) 766 1,053 2,554 Cash provided by (used for) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,605 11,767 (22,874) (127,857) 1,641 Investing Activities Additions to property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . Additions to computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in intercompany debt Decrease in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash used for investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing Activities Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt . . . . Retirement of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net payments on revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from issuance of intercompany debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in intercompany advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in intercompany investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intercompany dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . Decrease in drafts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash provided by (used for) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . — — (143,890) 15,030 — (128,860) 194,331 (158,594) (2,200) (10,147) (6,686) — — 139 (16,694) — — — — (44,355) 143,890 21,484 (16,030) — (127,857) — (14,900) (1,333) 5,254 327 118 445 — (9,182) — 8,255 — — (11,745) — 507 507 $ $ 46 — — — — (997) (997) — — — — 22,871 1,000 — — — — — 23,871 — — — 143,890 (15,030) — 128,860 (10,147) (6,686) — — (858) (17,691) — — — 194,331 (158,594) (2,200) (143,890) — 15,030 — 127,857 — — — (1,003) — — — — (9,182) — 8,255 (14,900) (1,333) 16,377 327 1 1 — — $ 626 953 $ $ Independent Auditors’ Report The Board of Directors and Shareholders Owens & Minor, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Owens & Minor, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Owens & Minor, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Richmond, Virginia February 3, 2004 47 Report of Management The management of Owens & Minor, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the consolidated financial statements and related information presented in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and include, when necessary, the best estimates and judgments of management. The company maintains a system of internal controls that provides reasonable assurance that its assets are safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use, that transactions are properly recorded and that financial records provide a reliable basis for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of directors who are not current employees of Owens & Minor, Inc., meets periodically and privately with the company’s independent auditors and internal auditors, as well as with company management, to review accounting, auditing, internal control and financial reporting matters. The independent auditors and internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee with and without management present to discuss the results of their activities. G. Gilmer Minor, III Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Kaczka Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 48 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (in thousands, except per share data) Quarters 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2003 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per common share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Market price High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,017,969 108,310 12,891 $1,054,502 111,193 13,588 $1,063,509 111,742 12,835 $1,108,087 114,749 14,327 $ $ 0.38 0.35 0.08 17.80 15.75 $ $ 0.41 0.37 0.09 22.50 16.52 $ $ 2002 0.37 0.34 0.09 25.59 21.96 $ $ 0.37 0.36 0.09 27.04 17.50 Quarters 1st 2nd(1) 3rd(2) 4th(3) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per common share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Market price High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 966,683 103,031 10,820 $ 979,557 103,417 11,479 $ 992,453 105,127 10,737 $1,021,088 108,295 14,231 $ $ 0.32 0.29 0.07 20.30 17.91 $ $ 0.34 0.31 0.08 20.89 18.05 $ $ 0.32 0.29 0.08 19.73 13.28 $ $ 0.42 0.38 0.08 17.35 13.00 (1) (2) (3) In the second quarter of 2002, the company reduced the restructuring accrual by $0.2 million, or $0.1 million net of tax. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the third quarter of 2002, the company recorded a charge of $3.0 million, or $1.8 million net of tax, due to the cancellation of the company’s contract for mainframe computer services. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the company reduced the restructuring accrual by $0.3 million, or $0.2 million net of tax. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 49 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Index to Exhibits Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Owens & Minor, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 3(a), for the year ended December 31, 1994) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 10, 1994 between Owens & Minor, Inc. and Bank of New York, as successor Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4, for the quarter ended June 30, 1995) Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002 by and among Owens & Minor, Inc., as Borrower, Certain of its Subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the banks identified herein, Wachovia Bank, National Association and SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agents, Lehman Brothers Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Documentation Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4, for the quarter ended March 31, 2002) Senior Subordinated Indenture dated as of July 2, 2001 among Owens & Minor, Inc., as Issuer, Owens & Minor Medical, Inc., National Medical Supply Corporation, Owens & Minor West, Inc., Koley’s Medical Supply, Inc. and Stuart Medical, Inc., as Guarantors (the “Guarantors”), and SunTrust Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4.1, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001) First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 2, 2001 among Owens & Minor, Inc., the Guarantors and SunTrust Bank (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4.2, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001) Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 2, 2001 among Owens & Minor, Inc., the Guarantors, Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, First Union Securities, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4.3, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001) Rights Agreement dated as of April 30, 2004, between Owens & Minor, Inc., and Bank of New York, as Rights Agent. Owens & Minor, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61550, Exhibit 4)* Owens & Minor, Inc. Management Equity Ownership Program, as amended effective October 21, 2002, (incorporated herein by reference to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.2, for the year ended December 31, 2002)* Owens & Minor, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective July 1, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.3, for the year ended December 31, 2000)* Forms of Owens & Minor, Inc. Executive Severance Agreements (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.8, for the year ended December 31, 1998)* Owens & Minor, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(k), for the year ended December 31, 1993)* 50 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 11.1 14 21.1 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Owens & Minor, Inc. 2003 Directors’ Compensation Plan (“Directors’ Plan”) (incorporated herein by reference to Annex B of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement filed pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act on March 13, 2003 (File No. 001-09810))* The forms of agreement with directors entered into pursuant to (i) the Stock Option Program, (ii) the Deferred Fee Program and (iii) the Stock Purchase Program of the Directors’ Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit (10), for the quarter ended March 31, 1996)* Owens & Minor, Inc. 1998 Directors’ Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference from Annex B of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement filed pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act on March 13, 1998 (File No. 001-09810))* Amendment No. 1 to Owens & Minor, Inc. 1998 Directors’ Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.15, for the year ended December 31, 1998)* Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002 among O&M Funding Corp., Owens & Minor Medical, Inc., Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Blue Keel Funding, L.L.C., Fleet Bank, N.A., and Fleet Securities, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1, for the quarter ended March 31, 2002) Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of April 30, 2002 among Owens & Minor, Inc., Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc., Owens & Minor Medical, Inc. and O&M Funding Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.2, for the quarter ended March 31, 2002) Form of Authorized Distributor Agreement between Novation, LLC and Owens & Minor, effective as of July 1, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10, for the quarter ended September 30, 2001)** Calculation of Net Income per Common Share. Information related to this item is in Part II, Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15 – Net Income per Common Share Owens & Minor, Inc. Code of Honor Subsidiaries of Registrant Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. ** The Company has requested confidential treatment by the Commission of certain portions of this Agreement, which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. 51 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 27th day of February, 2004. OWENS & MINOR, INC. /s/ G. GILMER MINOR, III G. Gilmer Minor, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on the 27th day of February, 2004 and in the capacities indicated: /s/ G. GILMER MINOR, III G. Gilmer Minor, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ JEFFREY KACZKA Jeffrey Kaczka Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) /s/ OLWEN B. CAPE Olwen B. Cape Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) /s/ A. MARSHALL ACUFF, JR. A. Marshall Acuff, Jr. Director /s/ HENRY A. BERLING Henry A. Berling Director /s/ JOHN T. CROTTY John T. Crotty Director /s/ JAMES B. FARINHOLT, JR. James B. Farinholt, Jr. Director /s/ RICHARD E. FOGG Richard E. Fogg Director /s/ VERNARD W. HENLEY Vernard W. Henley Director /s/ PETER S. REDDING Peter S. Redding Director /s/ /s/ JAMES E. ROGERS James E. Rogers Director JAMES E. UKROP James E. Ukrop Director /s/ ANNE MARIE WHITTEMORE Anne Marie Whittemore Director 52 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 31.1 I, G. Gilmer Minor, III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Owens & Minor, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; [omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.] evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2004 G. Gilmer Minor, III Chief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 31.2 I, Jeffrey Kaczka, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Owens & Minor, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; [omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.] evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2004 Jeffrey Kaczka Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 32.1 In connection with the Annual Report of Owens & Minor, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Gilmer Minor, III, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. G. Gilmer Minor, III Chief Executive Officer Owens & Minor, Inc. February 27, 2004 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 32.2 In connection with the Annual Report of Owens & Minor, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Kaczka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Jeffrey Kaczka Chief Financial Officer Owens & Minor, Inc. February 27, 2004 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above