Report of the Directors and
Audited Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2014
for
Pathfinder Minerals Plc
Contents of the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
Company Information
Chairman’s Statement
Report of the Directors
Report of the Independent Auditors
Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income
Statement of Consolidated Financial Position
Statement of Financial Position – Company
Statement of Changes in Equity
Statement of Cash Flows – Group and Company
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page
4
5
7
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
3
Company Information
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
DIRECTORS:
SECRETARY:
REGISTERED OFFICE:
Henry Bellingham
Nicholas Trew
James Normand
John McKeon
James Normand
Becket House
36 Old Jewry
London
EC2R 8DD
REGISTERED NUMBER:
02578942 (England and Wales)
AUDITORS:
SOLICITORS:
NOMINATED ADVISER:
REGISTRARS:
BANKERS:
Chapman Davis LLP
2 Chapel Court
London
SE1 1HH
Travers Smith LLP
10 Snow Hill
London
EC1A 2AL
W H Ireland Limited
24 Martin Lane
London
EC4R 0DR
Capita Asset Services
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent
BR3 4TU
Royal Bank of Scotland
1 Dale Street
Liverpool
L2 2PP
4
Chairman’s Statement
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
Introduction
Over the past year as your chairman, I have developed a comprehensive understanding both of the
circumstances in which Pathfinder was deprived of its principal assets in late 2011; and of the potential
remedies available to the Company. I was keen to make shareholders aware in my June and September 2014
statements that the process to recover Pathfinder’s assets may be a lengthy one. It should come as no surprise
therefore that it is proving to be so. The process is, however, advancing.
Steps to recover the Company’s assets
There are a number of routes via which the Company may in due course restore control of its assets or gain
compensation for their loss.
Absent a more immediate diplomatic resolution which compels the Government of Mozambique to restore
control to Pathfinder of the areas previously licensed to it, it is hoped that Mozambique’s judicial system will
ultimately find, as the English courts have done, that Pathfinder (through its wholly-owned subsidiary, IM
Minerals Limited) did validly acquire its shareholding in Companhia Mineira de Naburi S.A.R.L
(“CMDN”). This, in turn, would allow Pathfinder to demonstrate to the Government of Mozambique that, as
a matter of Mozambique, as well as English, law, General Veloso and Diogo Cavaco (the “Defendants”) were
not entitled to divert the mining licences away from CMDN for their personal gain. I am confident that in
such a scenario the Government of Mozambique would take steps akin to reversing the licence transfer.
Following a resounding judgment from the English High Court in the Company’s favour, Pathfinder is
continuing to pursue its legal rights in Mozambique vigorously – and intends to do so until it is successful
in restoring to shareholders the assets of which they have been deprived. This will not, however, be a short
process. Notwithstanding the multiple proceedings ongoing in Mozambique it is likely that, whatever their
outcome, appeals will follow. For this reason, the Company has continuously kept an open mind with regards
to the merits of a mediated settlement with the Defendants. However, the willingness to date of the
Defendants to entertain reasonable terms for Pathfinder’s shareholders makes this an unlikely scenario.
A further legal route, by which the Company may recover its assets or seek compensation for its loss from
the Government of Mozambique, remains under advanced consideration.
Legal proceedings in Mozambique
There remain several legal proceedings ongoing in the Mozambican courts, each of which raises the issue of
the jurisdiction of the English court and/or Pathfinder’s status as a shareholder of CMDN. Shortly before the
year-end two significant judgments were handed down.
On 15 December 2014 Pathfinder announced that the Maputo Commercial Court had confirmed the validity
of the Company’s shareholding in CMDN following a hearing which took place on 6 December 2012. In
those proceedings Pathfinder had sought the annulment of certain resolutions purportedly passed at an
extraordinary general meeting of CMDN on 9 December 2011. The purpose of these resolutions was to
dismiss Pathfinder’s representatives on CMDN’s Board and to cancel Pathfinder’s shares in CMDN and
reissue them to the Defendants. It was therefore wholly appropriate that the Maputo Commercial Court
granted the annulment sought. Importantly, in its judgment the Maputo Commercial Court held that
Pathfinder did validly acquire its shareholding in CMDN.
It came as little surprise that, upon notification of this judgment, the Defendants applied to the Maputo
Commercial Court to appeal the decision. A decision on the appeal is awaited. Pathfinder will continue to
announce any material developments as and when it is notified of them.
On 31 December 2014 Pathfinder announced a decision from the Mozambique Supreme Court in respect of
the Company’s application for recognition of orders by the English court for costs aggregating £106,000 to
be paid by the Defendants. In its judgment, the Mozambique Supreme Court rejected the Company's claim
for recognition while upholding, with one exception, all of the Company's arguments.
5
Chairman’s Statement – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
The basis upon which the Mozambique Supreme Court rejected Pathfinder’s claim appears to be absurd. The
court determined that the jurisdiction clauses contained in the agreements which were the subject of the
dispute were not valid as a matter of Mozambique law because they conferred jurisdiction on the courts of
England and Wales without specifying which court in England and Wales was to have jurisdiction (or
providing the criteria for selecting the competent court). Such a ruling has serious implications for other
investors in Mozambique whose jurisdiction clauses would typically be no different to the standard
formulation contained in Pathfinder’s contracts. Pathfinder has asked the Supreme Court for permission to
appeal against its decision.
In the meantime, a further application for recognition – which includes Pathfinder’s application for
recognition of the English High Court’s declarations in respect of the Company’s acquisition of shares in
CMDN – is still pending. It is not known when judgment on this further claim might be delivered. It may
still be a considerable time.
Financial results and current financial position
The financial results of Pathfinder are, as for any pre-revenue company which does not currently have
operations, very straightforward. The most important financial measurement continues to be whether
Pathfinder has sufficient cash to see through its strategy to recover its assets. The Board continues to exercise
prudence with expenditure and believes the Company does have sufficient reserves for the foreseeable future.
Nevertheless, the Company wishes to maintain the ability to raise equity finance in the future should it be
required. In that context, although there are no immediate plans to seek such funding, in order that the
Company might promptly take advantage of any offer of additional finance, the Board is seeking from
shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting the powers required by company law to achieve
this. In the light of the current share price, it is likely that the subscription price for any further issue of
ordinary shares, should such an issue occur, would be less than their nominal value. Consequently, a share
capital reorganisation will also be necessary in order to effect such allotment. This is explained more fully
in the Notice of Annual General Meeting which is being sent to shareholders simultaneously with this report.
The financial statements of the Pathfinder Group for the year ended 31 December 2014 follow later in this
report. The Income Statement shows a loss of £1.1 million (2013 - £1.5 million). The conclusion of the legal
action in England during 2013 brought about a reduction in the rate of expenditure. Since the Company has
been prevented from conducting any activity relating to mining, the whole of this loss can be attributed to
the Company’s attempts to recover its expropriated licences.
The Group’s Statement of Financial Position shows net assets at 31 December 2014 of £1.1 million (2013 –
£2.2 million). The assets are held largely in the form of cash deposits (totalling £1.2 million at the year-end).
Outlook
Pathfinder is advancing the legal proceedings in Mozambique as efficiently and as expeditiously as the
judicial infrastructure allows. It is a slow process and judgments have been shown to take up to two years to
be handed down. While the Company is prepared to enforce its rights through the courts, we continue to
pursue in the background other possible routes to achieve a faster resolution; while at the same time
considering other ways to add value to the Company. Above all the Board’s objective is to seek the best
possible outcome for shareholders from the appalling actions which have afflicted the Company. I believe
that a positive outcome is achievable.
Henry Bellingham
Chairman
29 June 2015
6
Report of the Directors
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
The directors present their report with the consolidated financial statements of the company for the year
ended 31 December 2014.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY
The principal activity of the Group is mining.
REVIEW OF BUSINESS
The review of the business, its operations and finances is contained in the Chairman’s Statement.
DIVIDENDS
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend.
EVENTS SINCE THE END OF THE YEAR
These financial statements do not make provision for a claim from HMRC, received by the Company in April
this year, for the return of all the VAT recovered by the Company since HMRC accepted the Company’s VAT
registration in October 2013. With the addition of interest, this claim amounts to approximately £1.1 million.
Professional advice on the claim obtained by the Directors is that it has been based on incorrect assumptions
about the Company’s business plan and consequently is flawed. The Company is therefore challenging the
claim.
Pending resolution of this matter, material uncertainties therefore exist about the ability of the Company to
continue as a going concern. The Directors believe that the going concern basis of accounting nevertheless
remains appropriate and so these financial statements have been prepared on the presumption that the
Company remains a going concern. In their report the auditors refer to the Board’s decision to account in this
manner but do not qualify their report on these financial statements.
DIRECTORS
The directors shown below have held office during the whole of the period from 1 January 2014 to the date
of this report.
John McKeon
James Normand
Nicholas Trew
On 18 February 2014 Henry Bellingham was appointed to the Board as Chairman.
COMPANY’S POLICY ON PAYMENT OF CREDITORS
It is the company’s policy to pay suppliers in accordance with the payment terms negotiated with them. The
company’s average creditor days during the year were 20 days (2013: 43 days).
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The company’s financial instruments consist entirely of cash that arises directly from its operations. The
main purpose of these financial instruments is to fund the company’s operations as well as to manage
working capital, liquidity and invest surplus funds. It is, and has been throughout the period under review,
the company’s policy not to enter into derivative transactions and no trading in financial instruments has been
undertaken.
POLITICAL AND CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS
No charitable or political contributions were made during the current or previous year.
7
Report of the Directors – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDINGS
As at 29 June 2015 the following shareholders had notified the company of an interest of 3% or more of the
Company’s ordinary share capital:
Number of 1p Shareholding
Shareholder name ordinary shares percentage
John McKeon 128,209,700 12.4%
J V Consultores Internacionais Limitada
(a company controlled by Jacinto Veloso) 110,120,680 10.6%
JP Morgan Funds 94,685,000 9.1%
Nicholas Trew 94,375,753 9.1%
Diogo Cavaco 88,129,280 8.5%
Paul Ellison and Gareth Roberts as Joint Administrators of
Hill Street Investments plc 86,544,983 8.3%
Genesis Emerging Market Opportunities Fund 46,490,000 4.5%
YF Finance Limited 45,610,000 4.4%
RISK EXPOSURE
The Companies Act 2006 requires the Directors to set out in this report how the Group manages its exposure
to risk.
The directors consider that the Company has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its foreseeable
operational requirements.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board is responsible for establishing the strategic direction of the Company, monitoring the Group’s
trading performance and appraising and executing development and acquisition opportunities. The Company
holds regular Board meetings, at which financial and other reports, including working capital reports and
acquisition opportunities, are considered and, where appropriate, voted on.
The Directors support high standards of corporate governance and the Board complies with the QCA
Guidelines so far as reasonably practicable and appropriate taking into account the Company’s size. The
Company’s current situation does not allow for separate audit and remuneration committees and is not
conducive to the appointment of non-executive directors, all of which the Board is keen to do as soon as
circumstances allow.
The Board supports the principle of clear reporting of financial performance to shareholders. Each year,
shareholders receive a full annual report and interim report. The Board regards the Annual General Meeting
as an opportunity to communicate directly with private investors. Directors attend the Annual General
Meeting and are available to answer questions from shareholders present. The Board actively encourages
feedback and shareholder dialogue, whether oral or written.
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
The directors are responsible for preparing the Report of the Directors and the financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law
the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the directors must not approve
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of
the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period.
8
Report of the Directors – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
– select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
– make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
– state that the financial statements comply with IFRS;
– prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that
the company will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain
the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the
company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They
are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
STATEMENT AS TO DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION TO AUDITORS
So far as the directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information (as defined by Section 418 of the
Companies Act 2006) of which the company’s auditors are unaware, and each director has taken all the steps
that he ought to have taken as a director in order to make himself aware of any relevant audit information
and to establish that the company’s auditors are aware of that information.
AUDITORS
The auditors, Chapman Davis LLP, will be proposed for re-appointment at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:
James Normand
Director and Company Secretary
29 June 2015
9
Report of the Independent Auditors to the Members of
Pathfinder Minerals Plc
We have audited the financial statements of Pathfinder Minerals Plc for the year ended 31 December 2014
which comprises the Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income, the consolidated and parent
company statements of financial position, the consolidated and parent company statements of changes in
equity, the consolidated and parent company statements of cash flow and the related notes. The financial
reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of
the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s
members those matters we are required to state to them in a Report of the Auditors and for no other purpose.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
company and the company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we
have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Report, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the
financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit
and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices
Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members as a body
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in
giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom
this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in
writing.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient
to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether
caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to
the company’s circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the
financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the Report of the
Directors to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we become aware of
any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements:
– give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the parent company’s affairs as at
31 December 2014 and of the Group’s loss for the year then ended;
– have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; and
– have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Emphasis of matter – going concern
In forming our opinion on the financial statements, which is not qualified, we have considered the adequacy
of the disclosures made in the note 2 to the financial statements and in the Directors’ Report concerning the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern when taking into account the contingent liability in relation
to the ongoing VAT enquiry disclosed in note 16.
10
Report of the Independent Auditors to the Members of
Pathfinder Minerals Plc – continued
The existence and materiality of the contingent liability in relation to VAT repayable cast significant doubt
about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the absence of further funding. Uncertainty
therefore exists concerning whether the Company will realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the
normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial statements. The financial statements do
not include the adjustments that would result if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern.
Opinion on other matter prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Report of the Directors for the financial year for which the
financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to
report to you if, in our opinion:
– adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
received from branches not visited by us; or
– the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
– certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
– we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Keith Fulton (Senior Statutory Auditor),
for and on behalf of Chapman Davis LLP, Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
2 Chapel Court
London
SE1 1HH
29 June 2015
11
Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
Year ended 31 December 2014 2013
Notes £’000 £’000
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Revenue – –
Administrative expenses (1,070) (1,480)
–––––––– ––––––––
OPERATING LOSS 5 (1,070) (1,480)
Finance income 6 14 21
–––––––– ––––––––
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX (1,056) (1,459)
Income tax 7 – –
–––––––– ––––––––
LOSS FOR THE YEAR (1,056) (1,459)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME – –
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR (1,056) (1,459)
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss per share (expressed in pence per share) 8
Basic (0.1) (0.1)
Diluted (0.1) (0.1)
–––––––– ––––––––
The notes form part of these financial statements
12
Statement of Consolidated Financial Position
31 December 2014
2014 2013
Notes £’000 £’000
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Trade and other receivables 10 61 185
Cash and cash equivalents 11 1,172 2,134
–––––––– ––––––––
1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL ASSETS 1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
EQUITY
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Called up share capital 12 18,289 18,289
Share premium 11,022 11,022
Retained earnings (28,176) (27,120)
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL EQUITY 1,135 2,191
–––––––– ––––––––
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables 13 98 128
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL LIABILITIES 98 128
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 29 June 2015 and were signed on its
behalf by:
James Normand
Finance Director
The notes form part of these financial statements
13
Statement of the Company’s Financial Position
31 December 2014
2014 2013
Notes £’000 £’000
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Investments 9 – –
–––––––– ––––––––
– –
–––––––– ––––––––
CURRENT ASSETS
Trade and other receivables 10 61 185
Cash and cash equivalents 11 1,172 2,134
–––––––– ––––––––
1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL ASSETS 1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
EQUITY
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Called up share capital 12 18,289 18,289
Share premium 11,022 11,022
Retained earnings (deficit) (28,307) (27,251)
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL EQUITY 1,004 2,060
–––––––– ––––––––
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables 13 229 259
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL LIABILITIES 229 259
–––––––– ––––––––
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,233 2,319
–––––––– ––––––––
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 29 June 2015 and were signed on its
behalf by:
James Normand
Finance Director
The notes form part of these financial statements
14
Statement of Changes in Equity
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
Called up Profit
share and loss Share Total
capital account premium equity
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Group
Balance at 1 January 2013 18,289 (25,661) 11,022 3,650
Changes in equity
Total comprehensive loss – (1,459) – (1,459)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Balance at 31 December 2013 18,289 (27,120) 11,022 2,191
Changes in equity
Total comprehensive loss – (1,056) – (1,056)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Balance at 31 December 2014 18,289 (28,176) 11,022 1,135
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Company
Balance at 1 January 2013 18,289 (25,792) 11,022 3,519
Changes in equity
Total comprehensive loss – (1,459) – (1,459)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Balance at 31 December 2013 18,289 (27,251) 11,022 2,060
Changes in equity
Total comprehensive loss – (1,056) – (1,056)
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
Balance at 31 December 2014 18,289 (28,307) 11,022 1,004
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
The notes form part of these financial statements
15
Statement of Cash Flows – Group and Company
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
2014 2013
£’000 £’000
Cash flows from operating activities
Loss before income tax (1,056) (1,459)
Finance income (14) (21)
–––––––– ––––––––
(1,070) (1,480)
Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables 124 (22)
Decrease in trade and other payables (30) (152)
–––––––– ––––––––
Net cash from operating activities (976) (1,654)
–––––––– ––––––––
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received 14 21
–––––––– ––––––––
Net cash from investing activities 14 21
–––––––– ––––––––
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (962) (1,633)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 2,134 3,767
–––––––– ––––––––
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 1,172 2,134
–––––––– ––––––––
The notes form part of these financial statements
16
Notes to the Financial Statements
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Pathfinder Minerals Plc is a public limited company whose ordinary shares are listed on the Alternative
Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange; and is incorporated and domiciled in the UK. The address
of its registered office is Becket House, 36 Old Jewry, London EC2R 8DD.
The financial statements of Pathfinder Minerals PLC for the year ended 31 December 2014 were authorised
for issue by the Board on 29 June 2015 and the statement of consolidated financial position signed on the
Board’s behalf by James Normand.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards and IFRIC interpretations and with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to
companies reporting under IFRS. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost
convention and are presented in the functional currency in £’000.
As explained in the Directors’ Report (under the heading ‘Events since the end of the year’), circumstances
exist which give rise to a material uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
After taking advice and considering the uncertainties described in the Directors’ Report, the Directors have
nevertheless concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the company has adequate resources to
continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting in preparing these financial statements.
Although the Company’s direct subsidiary, IM Minerals Limited, itself holds the whole of the issued share
capital of Companhia Mineira de Naburi SARL, which in turn holds the whole of the issued share capital of
Sociedade Geral de Mineracao de Moçambique SARL, events in 2011 indicated that the Company does not
control either of these sub-subsidiaries. Neither has it been possible to obtain audited accounts for them.
Accordingly these financial statements consolidate the financial statements of IM Minerals Limited only.
IM Minerals Limited is a dormant intermediate holding company.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and in hand and other short term highly liquid deposits with
original maturities of three months or less.
Share capital
Ordinary shares of the company are classified as equity.
New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
The adoption of new standards, where relevant, has had no impact on the reported results nor on the financial
position of the company.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, in the
case of the Group using International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union,
requires the directors to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities,
income and expenditure and the disclosures made in the financial statements. Such estimates and judgements
must be continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of
future events.
Details of accounting estimates and judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts
recognised in the financial statements have been disclosed under the relevant note or accounting policy for
each area where disclosure is required.
17
Notes to the Financial Statements – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
3. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
The Group has one activity only. Of the Group’s administrative expenses, £128,000 (2013 – £409,000) was
spent in Mozambique. The whole of the value of the Group’s and the Company’s net assets in their respective
financial statements at 31 December 2014 and 2013 was attributable to UK assets and liabilities.
4. EMPLOYEES AND DIRECTORS
There were no employees, other than the directors.
The following table sets out and analyses the remuneration of directors for the years ended 31 December
2014 and 2013 in £s:
Contributions
Benefits Total to pension Total remuneration
Fee Salaries in kind emoluments schemes 2014 2013
£ £ £ £ £ £ £
Henry Bellingham – 44,000 – 44,000 – 44,000 –
John McKeon 48,000 – – 48,000 – 48,000 48,000
Nicholas Trew – 150,000 5,330 155,330 15,000 170,330 170,880
James Normand – 120,000 4,358 124,358 12,000 136,358 136,626
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
48,000 270,000 9,688 327,688 27,000 398,688 355,506
––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––– –––––––
5. OPERATING LOSS
2014 2013
£’000 £’000
The loss before income tax is stated after charging:
Auditors’ remuneration 10 10
Directors’ remuneration 399 355
Litigation costs 348 1,304
And after crediting:
Recovery of VAT relating to earlier years – 762
–––––––– ––––––––
Any recovery of litigation expenditure resulting from the Court costs awards in the Company’s favour will
be recognised in the accounts when received.
6. NET FINANCE INCOME
2014 2013
£’000 £’000
Interest on bank deposits 14 21
–––––––– ––––––––
18
Notes to the Financial Statements – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
7. INCOME TAX
Analysis of tax expense
No liability to UK corporation tax arose on ordinary activities for the year ended 31 December 2014 nor for
the year ended 31 December 2013.
Factors affecting the tax expense
The tax assessed for the year is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK. The difference is
explained below:
2014 2013
£’000 £’000
Loss on ordinary activities before income tax (1,056) (1,459)
–––––––– ––––––––
Loss on ordinary activities multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax
in the UK of 21.5% (2013 – 23.25%) (227) (339)
Effects of:
Unrelieved tax losses carried forward 227 339
–––––––– ––––––––
Tax expense – –
–––––––– ––––––––
8. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is calculated, as set out in the tables below, by dividing the earnings attributable to
ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
A diluted loss per share has not been calculated as the effect of the exercise of outstanding warrants and
options would be anti-dilutive.
Weighted
average Per share
Earnings number amount
£’000 of shares – pence
2014
Basic earnings per share
Earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders (1,056) 1,037,167,230 (0.1)
———— ——–––—— ————
2013
Basic earnings per share
Earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders (1,459) 1,037,167,230 (0.1)
———— ——–––—— ————
19
Notes to the Financial Statements – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
9. SUBSIDIARIES
Shares in group
undertakings
£’000
COST
At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 34,806
––––––––
PROVISIONS
At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 34,806
––––––––
NET BOOK VALUE
At 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 –
––––––––
The Company’s subsidiaries, each of which is wholly-owned, are: Incorporated in:
IM Minerals Limited England and Wales
Companhia Mineira de Naburi SARL Mozambique
Sociedade Geral de Mineracao de Moçambique SARL Mozambique
IM Minerals Limited held the shares in Companhia Mineira de Naburi SARL which held titanium dioxide
mining concessions in the Republic of Mozambique. In November 2011 the original vendors of
IM Minerals’ subsidiary, Companhia Mineira de Naburi SARL (“CMdN”), advised the Company that they
had procured the cancellation of IM Minerals’ shares in CMdN and the transfer of its assets (the mining
licences) to another company controlled by them. Whilst the Company is taking legal and other action in
order to recover the shares and the licences, the Company, in the interest of accounting prudence, made full
provision in the 2011 financial statements against the cost of its investment in IM Minerals.
10. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
2014
2013
Group Company Group Company
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
VAT recoverable (see note 16) 20 20 27 27
Other debtors and prepaid expenses 41 41 158 158
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
61 61 185 185
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Group Company Group Company
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Bank balances 1,172 1,172 2,134 2,134
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
2014
2013
12. CALLED UP SHARE CAPITAL
Allotted, issued and fully paid: 2014 2013
Number Class £’000 £’000
1,037,167,230 Ordinary shares of 1 penny each 10,372 10,372
79,971,393 Deferred shares of 9.9 pence each 7,917 7,917
–––––––– ––––––––
18,289 18,289
–––––––– ––––––––
20
Notes to the Financial Statements – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
13. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
2014
2013
Group Company Group Company
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Trade creditors 13 13 2 2
Amount owing to subsidiary – 131 – 131
Other creditors 27 27 33 33
Accrued expenditure 58 58 93 93
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
98 229 128 259
–––––––– –––––––– –––––––– ––––––––
14. SHARE OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
No share options or warrants have been awarded or exercised, nor have any expired, during the year.
Unexercised share options and warrants at the beginning and end of the year, all of which are currently
capable of being exercised, were held as follows:
Share options and warrants
Number of shares
the subject of Exercise price Latest
options or warrants per share exercise date
Directors
John McKeon 36,000,000 10p 26 July 2016
Nicholas Trew 36,000,000 10p 26 July 2016
16,000,000 4.75p 9 February 2021
24,400,000 10p 26 July 2016
{ 3,600,000 10p 26 July 2016
{ 6,000,000 4.75p 8 February 2016
James Normand
Former directors and others
–––––––––
–––––––––
Total 122,000,000
At 26 June 2015 (the latest date before publication of these financial statements), the mid-market price of
the Company’s shares was 0.42 pence. The value of the options granted to directors and others, in connection
with the reverse takeover and the ongoing development of the company, has been considered in the context
of the requirements of IFRS 2; and in the opinion of the directors there is no material charge to be made to
the income statement. There have been no changes to the numbers of unexercised warrants and share options
since 31 December 2014.
15. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
During the year, a director was reimbursed sums totalling £15,695 (2014 – £nil) for personal expenditure
incurred on Company business.
Details of directors’ remuneration are given in note 4 above.
21
Notes to the Financial Statements – continued
For the Year Ended 31 December 2014
16. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
As part of the agreement for the purchase of the shares in its subsidiary, Companhia Mineira de Naburi
SARL (“CMdN”), the Company’s subsidiary, IM Minerals Limited, agreed to pay the vendors a further sum
of $9,900,000 if, following further exploration and appraisal, an agreement is reached for the construction
of a facility for the processing of ore extracted from the Naburi mineral sands deposit. This sum has since
been reduced by advances of £90,083, made by IM Minerals Limited, and £75,933, made by the Company,
to one of the vendors, Mr Diogo Cavaco.
Similarly, as part of its agreement for the purchase of the whole of the issued share capital of Sociedade
Geral de Mineracao de Moçambique SARL, CMdN has agreed to pay the vendors, BHP Billiton, a further
sum of $9,500,000 if, following further exploration and appraisal, an agreement is reached for the
construction of a facility for the processing of ore extracted from the Moebase mineral sands deposit. This
obligation is guaranteed by IM Minerals Limited.
In April 2015 the Company received an assessment from HMRC demanding the return of all VAT previously
refunded to the Company. Together with interest, this assessment is for £1,109,765. As explained in the
Directors’ Report, professional advice on the claim obtained by the Directors is that it has been based on
incorrect assumptions about the Company’s business plan and consequently is flawed. The Company is
therefore challenging the claim.
For the same reason no provision has been made in these financial statements for the possibility that VAT
claimed but not refunded as at 31 December 2014 (£20,000 – see note 10 above) will not in due course be
reimbursed by HMRC.
22
sterling 165770