Quarterlytics / Pearson

Pearson

pson · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker pson
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2020 Annual Report · Pearson
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
P

e

a

r

s

o

n

A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

2

0

Learning.  
For life.

Annual report and accounts 2020

 
 
 
 
 
In this report

Strategic report
Introduction 
01 

02  Pearson at a glance

04  Key performance indicators

06  Chair’s introduction

10 

 Chief Executive’s  
strategic overview

26  Learner outcomes

27 

 Creating value for  
our stakeholders

Governance
65  Corporate governance

Other information
210 Five-year summary

100  Directors’ remuneration 

212  Financial key performance 

report

indicators

30  Directors’ duties statement

122 Additional disclosures

217  Glossary of major products  

31  Financial review

37  Segmental performance

14  Market context

40  Sustainability

16 

 Our business model

18  Our strategy

20 

 Our five new  
business divisions 

56 

60 

 Organisational risk 
management

 Principal risks and 
uncertainties

and services

220 Shareholder information

BC  Principal offices worldwide

Financial statements
128  Independent auditors’ 

report to the members  
of Pearson plc

137  Consolidated financial 

statements

199  Company financial 

statements

Our reporting structure

Following the appointment of  
our new Chief Executive, Pearson  
has announced a new corporate 
structure, approved by the Board 
and coming into effect from 2021. 
This is outlined in more detail on 
pp18–25. In this annual report, the 
forward-looking ‘Our strategy’ 
section follows our new structure. 

The ‘Financial review’ and ‘Segmental 
performance’ sections continue to 
use our 2020 reporting structure – 
Global Online Learning, Global 
Assessment, North American 
Courseware and International –  
as these relate to our 2020 
performance. Next year’s report  
will use our new operating  
structure throughout.

Strategic report

G  Glossary

The strategic report, up to and 
including p64, was approved for 
issue by the Board on 15 March 2021 
and signed on its behalf by:

Sally Johnson  
Chief Financial Officer

Across Pearson we have language 
and terminology that is unique to  
us and to our sector. To help you 
navigate this, we have continued  
to include a glossary of key terms, 
products and services. Any words  
or terms marked with the ‘G’ symbol 
are defined in the section, found at 
the back of this report.

01

Learning. For life.

We are building direct to consumer 
relationships with millions of people around 
the world, across a lifetime of learning.

Sidney Taurel, Chair

Andy Bird, Chief Executive

Sally Johnson, Chief Financial Officer

I believe the pandemic 
has helped bring us 

We intend Pearson  
to be the world’s 

2020 was a 
challenging year  

closer together, and I am 
immensely proud of the  
way Pearson’s employees 
across the world have united 
through this difficult situation 
to support each other and 
our customers.

preeminent learning 
company, delivering the 
world’s best learning 
products to more people than 
ever before. This is good for 
our business, and it is good 
for the world. Because, when 
we demonstrate the value  
of learning, we grow our 
business and transform lives.

for society and many 
businesses, Pearson 
included. That said, we 
delivered a resilient sales 
performance in light of these 
circumstances and a profit 
performance in line with 
revised expectations post 
COVID-19. In 2021 we expect 
Group revenue to grow and 
profit to be in line with 
market expectations.

Discover more online

pearsonplc.com

Use this QR code to visit our  
newly launched corporate website,  
where you can also find the online version  
of our 2020 annual report and accounts.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information02

Pearson at a glance

We are the leading learning company offering end-to-end 
solutions, enabling greater access to high-quality, affordable 
learning experiences. We are the global experts in learning. 

c.200

countries

20,000+

employees

We enable tens of millions of learners per year 
to maximise their success.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationWe are Pearson. Our purpose  is to help everyone achieve their potential through learning.03

Our businesses

Learn more:

Our five new business divisions, p20

Our five new business divisions, coming into effect in 2021, are the foundation for the long-term growth of Pearson, all of which will be 
supported by our new Direct to Consumer group.

FIVE BUSINESSES TO DRIVE GROWTH

VIRTUAL LEARNING

HIGHER 
EDUCATION

ENGLISH 
LANGUAGE 
LEARNING

WORKFORCE 
SKILLS

ASSESSMENT & 
QUALIFICATIONS

p20 

p21 

p22 

p23 

p24 

Direct to Consumer

Enabling  
sustainable growth

Driving  
shareholder value

Contributing to a more 
equitable world

Our commitment to sustainability and learner outcomes

Learning for a better 
life, a better world

Improving learner 
outcomes

Our Sustainable Business Plan 
2030 supports our business 
strategy and drives positive 
outcomes for people from  
all backgrounds, our global 
community and planet.

We design our products  
to drive learning outcomes. 
When we demonstrate and 
deliver the value of learning, 
we can grow our business 
and help people achieve 
their potential.

Learn more:

Learn more:

Sustainability, p40

Learner outcomes, p26

R EV E R

O
 F
G
N
I
N
R
A
E
L

 Product 

O N E

Y

LEARNIN

G

F

O

Sustainable 
Business Plan 
2030
Helping more people create 
a better life for themselves 
and a better world

R

A

B

E

T

T

E
R
W
O
R
L
D

L

E

 Pla

net 

ADING RES P O N S

Y

e

o

L

B

I

  P

p l e 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
 
 
04

Key performance indicators (KPIs)

FINANCIAL MEASURES

Sales

R

£3,397m

£million

20

19

18

17

16

Adjusted operating profit1

R

£313m

£million

3,397

 3,869

 4,129

 4,513

 4,552

20

19

18

17

16

313

 581

 546

 576

 635

Net debt1

£463m

£million

463

 432

 143

20

19

18

17

16

Adjusted earnings per share1

R

Operating profit/loss2

Basic earnings per share2

28.7p

pence

20

19

18

17

16

28.7

 70.3

 57.8

 54.1

 58.8

£411m

£million

20

19

18

17

16

 -2,497

411

 275

 553

 451

41.0p

pence

20

19

18

17

16

 -286.8

Operating cash flow and cash conversion1

R

Net cash generated from operations2

Dividend per share

£315m

£million

20

19

18

17

16

£450m

£million

 315 (101%)

 418 (72%)

 513 (94%)

 669 (116%)

 663 (104%)

20

19

18

17

16

19.5p

pence

20

19

18

17

16

 19.5

 19.5

 18.5

 17.0

450

 480

 547

 462

 522

 1,016

 1,092

41.0

 34.0

 75.6

 49.9

52.0

Total shareholder returns3

R

10.65%

%

1-year TSR

3-year TSR

0.18%

5-year TSR

10.65%

13.08%

1  See pp33–35 for an explanation of these 
alternative performance measures.

2  Equivalent statutory measure.
3  Source: Bloomberg.

  Note: See pp212–216 for full reconciliation of  
the alternative performance measures to the 
equivalent statutory measure.

  Note: IFRS 16 adopted in 2019 – no KPIs have been 
restated for historical accounting adoptions.

Read more:

Learn more online:

R   See how we link strategy to 

p100 

management reward

plc.pearson.com/en-GB/purpose/
our-targets-kpis

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information05

BUSINESS MEASURES

Digital revenue1

20

19

18

17

66%

36%

62%

34%

59%

73%

45%

28%

27%

Performance in our businesses in 2020

Global Online Learning

18%*

Virtual Schools enrolment growth  
(new and existing schools)

OPM  G  underlying course enrolments  
growth (excl. discontinued programs) 

43%

20%

30%

34%

Global Assessment

28%

38%

(14)%*

Testing volume decline

Online proctoring growth  G

(22)%

1,143%

32%

27%

41%

Digital

Digitally-enabled

Non-digital

1  Excludes GEDU, Wall Street English (WSE) and US K-12 Courseware.  

GEDU was sold in 2017, WSE was sold in 2018; US K-12 Courseware was  
held for sale in 2018 and was sold in 2019.

North American Courseware

(13)%*

Digital registrations growth  
(including eTexts)

Inclusive Access  G  sales growth  
(to not-for-profit institutions)

9%

29%

International

(19)%*

PTE Academic  G  test volume

(36)%

*  Year-on-year underlying revenue growth for 2020.

NON-FINANCIAL MEASURES

Employee experience and engagement2

p49 

Female representation 

2020

2019

Employees rating our COVID-19 response on a scale of 1 (poor)  
to 10 (excellent)2

Employees who would recommend working at Pearson to a 
friend or colleague

Board of Directors

Senior leadership3

All employees

8.6

+17 NPS

Employees who have done something to reskill or upskill in 2020

63%

Employees working from home effectively shortly after closing 
offices due to COVID-19

GB median gender pay gap

3  Typically, two reporting lines from the Chief Executive.

87%

Improve racial and ethnic diversity

2  Data from Pearson’s employee 2020 quarterly pulse survey.

Board member – Directors of colour

Reduce our carbon footprint

2020

2019

2018

% US black employees at manager level and above

45%

36%

60%

10%

Total tCO2e –  
Scope 1, 2 (market based) and 3

% reduction vs previous year

% reduction vs 2018 baseline

354,162

580,914

614,380

% UK black employees at manager level and above

% US Hispanic/Latino employees at manager level and above

39%

42%

5%

5%

We have enhanced our employee data collection to report on racial and ethnic 
diversity KPIs in our two largest markets for the first time in 2020 and aim to expand 
this globally. We will track progress going forward with a target of achieving 
employee diversity that is representative of the diversity in the countries in which 
we operate.

33%

34%

59% 

12%

2020

1

3.3%

3.8%

1.7%

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information06

Chair’s introduction

Our vision is to  
be the leading  
learning company  
in this increasingly 
interconnected world.

Dear shareholders,
2020 will go down as one of the most 
unprecedented and challenging years in 
modern history. It has impacted us all in ways 
we would have scarcely imagined possible 
before. Yet, among the ongoing uncertainty,  
it is heartening to see so many examples of 
people supporting one another – from 
families and local communities through to  
the broader business world and beyond.  
I am particularly proud of the way Pearson’s 
employees have supported each other and all 
our stakeholders through this difficult time. 

The pandemic has also acted as a catalyst for 
driving innovation, as we find new and more 
efficient ways of working, connecting and 
communicating. This is characterised by the 
rapid response from the scientific world in 
mobilising to provide a world-class testing and 
vaccination response. It can also be seen in 
the learning sector, through the speed and 
scale in which learning has moved online. 

Sidney Taurel 
Chair

In time, I know the world will normalise,  
but my hope is that the appetite for  
innovation and technological disruption  
will continue unabated. This provides 
opportunities for companies such as Pearson 
to grow, contribute to society and create 
shareholder value. 

Performance and progress in 2020 
In a year that has been incredibly challenging 
from an operational and financial perspective, 
I am encouraged that we were able to achieve 
both sales and adjusted operating profit in 
line with the revised expectations that we  
laid out in March in response to the 
pandemic’s impact. 

Notably, Global Online Learning sales grew 
significantly as appetite for, and interest in, 
online learning surged. The more negative 
impact of COVID-19 has been seen most 
keenly in International and Global Assessment 
due predominantly to test centre and school 
closures. It is encouraging to see US Higher 
Education Courseware performing in line with 

pre-COVID-19 expectations, with digital sales 
in US Higher Education Courseware now 
accounting for more than 70% of total sales  
in this division, and eText growth increases 
indicating that we are recapturing sales that 
were lost to the secondhand book market.

Uncertainty persists into 2021 due to 
COVID-19 but, given progress with the global 
roll-out of vaccines, we are currently planning 
on the basis that test centres will reopen, in a 
socially distanced fashion, during April, and 
that normal operations will resume in H2 
2021, including borders reopening. As such, 
we expect to deliver financial results broadly 
consistent with market expectations.

COVID-19 response and engaging 
with our stakeholders 
We are proud to have played our part in 
supporting our employees, customers, 
partners and broader stakeholders during  
the pandemic. The Board held an additional 
unscheduled meeting in mid-April to  
consider financial scenario planning and  
the company’s broader response to the 
pandemic. We responded in four key ways: 

Supporting employees 

The Board discussed the potential to access 
government funding and take advantage of 
the furloughing programme. We ultimately 
decided against this option, knowing others 
were in more acute need of support. Although 
areas of our business were impacted by 
school and centre closures, we eschewed 
layoffs and instead, where possible, we 
redeployed our employees to high-growth 
areas of the business, such as online learning. 
We fostered employee engagement and 
support groups and aimed to support our 
employees across the world as best we could. 
You can read more on this approach in our 
stakeholder engagement section on p27 

Supporting customers 

Our customers around the world were 
required to move rapidly online, in many cases 
in just a matter of days. We made the decision 
early on to make some of our popular digital 
materials and content available for free to 
them in the early months of the pandemic,  
to help enable the process of moving to digital 
learning. The feedback we received was highly 
positive and we believe this will lead to deeper, 
more durable long-term relationships. Read 
more on p13 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
07

Supporting shareholders 

Supporting broader stakeholders

In April, the Board felt it appropriate to  
pause the share buyback that launched  
at the beginning of the year, given the deeply 
uncertain times ahead. Another key decision 
for us was whether to pay the final 2019 
dividend. Ultimately, the Board and I decided 
that, due to the strength of our balance sheet, 
our strong financial position and liquidity  
and our confidence in the outlook in the 
post-pandemic world, the right decision was 
to proceed with a recommendation to pay it.  
We performed financial stress testing and 
scenario planning and concluded that, even  
in a worst-case scenario, we would still have 
sufficient liquidity. Our shareholders rely on 
dividends and we strongly believed it was the 
responsible thing to do, as a reward for your 
support and loyalty. 

The Board and I recognised there were many 
in society in urgent need of direct help and  
we came to the decision that myself, the 
Board and Executive Directors would take a 
temporary, voluntary reduction in pay and 
fees. This was then donated to charities 
engaged in COVID-19-related activities. 

This package of support was the right thing 
to do, reflecting the financial strength of the 
business, and it was also a demonstration of 
the capabilities that Pearson has successfully 
created as we have transitioned from print 
to digital. 

I believe that, long after this dreadful 
pandemic has passed, there will continue  
to be sustainable interest in online learning 
globally, and we are well placed given our 
investment and global leadership in this area. 

New leadership for the next phase  
of Pearson’s story 
Further to our announcement at the end of 
2019, John Fallon retired from the role of  
Chief Executive in 2020. John’s career with 
Pearson spanned over two decades, including 
seven years as Chief Executive, and his 
passion and commitment to the business  
was evident to all of us. 

As Chief Executive, John worked tirelessly 
leading Pearson through a period of 
significant change and led its transformation 
from a media conglomerate to a single 
focused learning company with a strong 
technology platform. 

John’s hard work and vision established  
the foundations for Pearson’s next chapter. 
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank 
him for his considerable contribution and 
dedication to Pearson and wish him well for 
the future. 

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR FINANCIAL MEASURES

Deliver sustainable returns

Total shareholder returns 

Dividend per share 
19.5p

10.65%

pence

20
19
18
17
16

19.5p

19.5p

18.5p

17p

52p

14.55%

12.17%

26.32%

28.51%

23.84%

1-year

3-year

5-year

0.18%
(5.31)%

(2.73)%

(11.45)%
(9.73)%

(10.59)%
(5.66)%

13.08%

8.66%

Pearson

FTSE 100

FTSE All Share

FTSE All Share Media

STOXX 600 Media

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information08

Chair’s introduction

The Board ran a thorough and rigorous search 
process for John’s successor, with strong 
governance, interviewing a broad range of 
very high-calibre candidates. We were 
delighted that this resulted in the 
appointment of Andy Bird, who became  
Chief Executive in October 2020. 

As management articulates this strategy and 
executes on it over time, I believe there is a big 
opportunity to grow our business in exciting 
new areas, while also continuing to focus on 
existing products and services that are either 
growing quickly or now stabilising after 
several years of transition. 

We have proposed a final 2020 dividend of 
13.5p, resulting in a full year dividend of  
19.5p. This is reflective of the strength of our 
balance sheet, consistent with our approach 
to maintain a sustainable dividend, and our 
confidence in the future growth potential of 
the business.

Andy was the standout candidate from a  
very strong field given his wealth of 
international consumer experience, digital 
and brand-building expertise, excellent 
people engagement and leadership skills, 
proven ability to create value – and his  
affinity to Pearson’s culture and values. 

He is a proven, visionary leader of a large, 
complex and diverse business, and an 
outstanding executive who is well placed  
to build on the foundations laid at Pearson,  
to enhance long-term value for all our 
shareholders. Further, as an existing Board 
member who joined us in May 2020, his 
knowledge of Pearson meant he has been 
able to hit the ground running. 

We are very grateful and appreciative for  
the engagement, time and support of our 
shareholders in ensuring we were able to 
appoint the right candidate. You can read 
more directly from Andy in the following 
pages, and more on the process of appointing 
Andy in the Nomination & Governance 
Committee report on p84 

Our strategic direction 
The Board and I have been impressed with the 
early impact that Andy has made and we are 
optimistic regarding the future growth 
prospects of the company, noting the sense  
of pace and momentum that is building. 

We believe that the accelerating consumer 
demand for new digital forms of learning 
provides a real opportunity for us and we  
are supportive of management’s focus on  
the direct to consumer market. 

The Board supports the reorganisation of 
Pearson into five global business divisions, 
recognising that this will help drive our future 
growth and build on the structure we had in 
place throughout 2020. The Board and I are 
also supportive of actions announced to hold 
a review of our portfolio to focus on the 
priorities in these five new divisions.

You can read more on this in Andy’s overview, 
as well as the business model pages of this 
document found on p16 

Underpinned by a strong  
financial position 
To achieve our strategy and to endure into  
the future, it is vital to have a strong balance 
sheet. Despite challenging macro conditions, 
the Board is confident about Pearson’s 
medium- and long-term prospects, and the 
opportunities that exist in our business, 
particularly viewed through the lens of our 
evolving strategy, putting consumers at  
the heart of all we do.

Our capital allocation policy remains 
unchanged – to maintain a healthy balance 
sheet, invest in the business both organically 
and inorganically, pay a progressive and 
sustainable dividend and return any 
remaining funds to shareholders. 

In terms of any investments we make,  
we will always be disciplined and focused  
on the returns profile, and under the Board’s 
direction, we have introduced enhanced 
internal processes to measure and manage 
organic returns. Any future inorganic 
investment will have equal discipline  
and scrutiny.

Shareholders will be aware that, as a result of 
the uncertainty due to the pandemic, we took 
the decision in March 2020 to pause the 
£350m share buyback programme that we 
launched in January last year, with around 
£176m of the shares on offer completed.  
This decision, taken by the Board, reflected 
the fact that, while we do have a strong 
balance sheet with good headroom in 
liquidity, in unprecedented times we must 
make prudent decisions for the long term.  
At this point we believe maintaining a very 
strong balance sheet is appropriate. As such 
we are not planning to reinitiate the buyback. 
We will keep our balance sheet strength  
and potential for surplus cash returns  
under review, but do not see this in the 
immediate horizon.

Pearson retains significant financial 
headroom with net debt of £463m  
and immediately available liquidity of  
£1.9bn through committed facilities and  
cash balances. 

ESG, diversity and building a 
sustainable business 
Our historic commitment to embed 
sustainability into all business functions and 
operations remains unchanged. Since 
launching our Sustainable Business Plan 2030 
last year, we are focused on the most material 
environmental, social and governance (ESG) 
issues and know this work will only bolster  
our strategic objectives. 

The Board has been engaged on overseeing 
plans and progress towards our sustainability 
ambitions. I am pleased with the progress  
we made last year, particularly in advancing 
equity through the launch of our social bond 
(see p44 for more on this) and our ambitious 
goals on reducing emissions. 

We are also strengthening our approach to 
reporting and transparency by undertaking 
work towards the Task Force on Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the 
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 
(SASB). You can read more about our 
approach in the sustainability section  
on p47 and p54 

The Board is committed to improving our 
focus on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I).  
In this annual report we have expanded our 
reporting to include not just gender diversity 
but also ethnic diversity at company and 
Board level, as we commit to trying to 
continually strengthen this vital area.  
We know that diverse perspectives help 
broaden thinking and lead to improved 
performance and better ways of working. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information09

We believe that Pearson’s talent and content  
should reflect the diversity of the markets we serve, 

ensuring we create the best products, with the greatest 
impact, for the greatest number of people in the world.  
We believe that Pearson must have a positive impact on  
our customers’ lives, on the communities that we serve,  
and on the world of learning globally. 

Specifically, the Board and I were supportive 
of the formation of a DE&I task force of 
employees and leadership, with the aim of 
coming together to identify concrete, 
actionable ways to improve recruitment, 
retention and inclusion, and to ensure our 
products and services help build a more 
inclusive society. We have adopted a set of 
stretching goals around representation, 
company culture, product, and our role in 
society. An action plan comprising goals, 
pillars for action and initiatives for 
implementation over the next 12 to  
18 months underpins our commitment.  
You can read more on this on p50 

Board composition and engagement 
It has clearly been a difficult year for in-person 
stakeholder engagement in 2020, given the 
pandemic. However, our Board continued  
to engage virtually with, and encourage 
participation from, employees, educators, 
learners, community and thought leaders,  
as well as other stakeholders to ensure the 
company is contributing to wider society. 
More broadly, the Board remains fully 
committed to shareholder and broader 
stakeholder engagement and we welcome 
ongoing dialogue with all of our investors. 
Read more on our stakeholder engagement 
response in the S172 section on p30 

The Board continues to benefit from a diverse 
and wide range of backgrounds, skills and 
experience. You can read more about this in 
the Governance report p73 

As noted in last year’s report, 2020 also saw  
a change of Chief Financial Officer at Pearson. 
Sally Johnson, our former Deputy CFO, was 
appointed CFO in April 2020 following our 
Annual General Meeting (AGM). Sally has had 
an immediately positive impact with her deep 
knowledge of the business and the markets 
we operate in, her financial acumen, her 
leadership skills, and her incredible work 
ethic. I am delighted to have her on our 
management team and Board. 

We have also had further changes to the 
makeup of the Board which you can read 
about on p67 

Achieving our vision and delivering 
on our strategy 
Our vision is to be the world’s leading learning 
company. In the increasingly interconnected 
world we live in, this vision is highly relevant 
and the products and services we offer are 
increasingly in demand. This heightened 
demand is being seen from consumers 
around the world who want access to 
high-quality digital learning experiences to 
help them progress in the next stage of their 
lives – whether that be formal education, 
upskilling or changing career path. 

As you will hear from Andy later in these 
pages, and from the updated strategy that is 
articulated in the strategy section on pp18–25, 
we believe learning is fundamental to 
everything we do as humans and that we 
continue learning across our lifetimes, 
increasingly via direct to consumer means.  
We believe that everyone in the world should 
have the opportunity to learn, because 
learning transforms lives and societies. 
Pearson has long understood the value of 
learning and we believe we have a unique 
opportunity to enable greater access to 
high-quality, affordable learning experiences 
– and we are supportive of management’s 
determination to realise that ambition. 

The Board and I are keen to engage with our 
shareholders as circumstances allow.

Thank you for your ongoing support. 

Sidney Taurel 
Chair

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information10

Chief Executive’s strategic overview

We believe that 
everyone in the world 
should have the 
opportunity to learn, 
because learning 
transforms lives  
and societies.

Andy Bird 
Chief Executive

Dear shareholders,
I am delighted to be writing to you as 
Pearson’s new Chief Executive, a journey that 
started in May 2020 after joining the Board as 
a Non-Executive Director. I am fortunate to 
have had such a comprehensive induction to 
the business before taking over the reins from 
John Fallon. I would like to express my sincere 
gratitude to John, for his help in ensuring a 
smooth transition, for all that he did for 
Pearson, and for the strong foundations  
that he has laid for our future. 

Pearson understands the value that learning 
brings to people’s lives and the profound 
impact it has on the world; I have a deep 
passion for learning and am enormously 
excited about the opportunity ahead, 
particularly Pearson’s potential to reach  
many more people. My experience, at 
consumer-focused companies such as Walt 
Disney and Time Warner, has equipped me 
with the expertise to lead Pearson through 
the next chapter, as it accelerates its transition 
to becoming a digital-first company with the 
consumer at the heart of everything we do. 

Since joining Pearson, I have immersed myself 
in every conceivable aspect of the business 
and have been impressed by the progress 
that has been made over the last five years. 
Disappointing financial results during this 
time, and the complexity of the company and 
our operating model have obscured the vital 
purpose and true strengths of Pearson, and of 
the talented people who work here. There is 
still much to do but I am confident that we 
have a strategy that will return this business to 
sustainable, long-term growth. 

Our market
As we embark on the fourth industrial 
revolution, learning is more vital than it has 
ever been. We believe that everyone in the 
world should have the opportunity to learn, 
because learning transforms lives and 
societies. Pearson is well positioned to 
support people in developing the skills they 
need to participate in the new economy, to 
support this unprecedented societal shift,  
and therefore to capture the enormous 
growth potential in the market. 

The global learning market is vast – at around 
£5tn today, growing to over £7tn by 2030. 
Formal primary, secondary and tertiary 
education is 75% of that market and will 
remain the vast majority – we expect over a 
billion more learners to have moved through 
formal education by 2030. A growing global 
middle class and longer careers are also 
driving lifelong and informal learning, 
particularly for reskilling and upskilling,  
a trend that has been accelerated over the 
past year. This all adds up to huge structural 
tailwinds in our industry, and great 
opportunity for companies that can innovate 
and scale to meet the growing and changing 
demands of learners globally. There is a huge 
opportunity for Pearson, as only 3% of the 
£5tn learning market is currently digital. 

COVID-19 has accelerated the trend to 
digital-first in every part of our lives.  
Millions more people are connected to the 
internet. There’s been massive disruption to 
the world’s workforce. Governments and 
businesses need their people to learn new 
skills to survive and thrive. And learning is  
the key to that change, and to the new 
opportunities it creates. 

Also, how we learn is changing, driven  
by technology and new consumer habits. 
Consumers now focus on quality, accessibility 
and the return on their time. They want 
personalised, enjoyable experiences, 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information11

on demand, wherever they are. They want to 
track and prove what they’ve learned, and  
to realise its value in their careers and lives. 
And, just as consumer habits have changed in 
other industries such as music and television, 
so, the business of learning is also changing: 
more direct to consumer, more unbundled, 
and more skills-based. 

This does not mean that we will be 
abandoning our traditional markets in 
education, or our deep relationships with 
institutions. Those will remain the foundations 
of our business and of our future. Those 
markets and institutions themselves are 
changing to meet the needs of their 
consumers – and doing so in partnership  
with us. But we must also go where 
consumers want to go: into a lifetime of 
learning that helps them to keep pace  
in a rapidly changing world. 

Our strategy 
The market drivers outlined above create 
three big global opportunities for Pearson – 
the rise in online and digital tools for schools 
and education, the workforce skills gap, and 
the growing need for accreditation and 
certification – and we are strategically well 
placed to capitalise on these opportunities.  
To achieve this, we are reorganising our 
business and operations to focus on five 
business divisions to release untapped value 
and potential within the company. 

Direct to Consumer group

Our new Direct to Consumer group will act as  
Pearson’s in-house centre of excellence for the delivery  
of our consumer strategy. 
The group sits across all five divisions and will be the delivery of our 
consumer strategy going forward. It will enable the constant flow of new 
products across our business moving forward which will drive a 
significant part of our future growth.

Five business divisions to release 
untapped value and potential within  
the company 

Our five new business divisions are Virtual 
Learning, Higher Education, English Language 
Learning, Workforce Skills, and Assessment & 
Qualifications – all of which will be supported 
by our new Direct to Consumer group.  
Read more on this in our strategy pages  
on pp18–25 

These five divisions will form the foundation 
of the company. They are great businesses 
with excellent growth potential. They reinforce 
each other and will be the platform on which 
we build our direct to consumer vision.  
We want everyone in the world to realise the 
value and joy of learning. And we will help the 
world’s learners at every stage of life to unlock 
their potential in a rapidly changing world. 

Streamlining our portfolio to become a 
truly digital company 

Pearson has made good progress in 
rationalising its portfolio over recent years  
but there is still some way to go. We will 
therefore streamline our portfolio to focus  
on the priorities of our five new businesses, 
and on our mission to become a globally 
scalable digital company. This will not happen 
overnight. We will ensure that any disposals or 
new acquisitions support the strategic focus 
of the company, maintain the health of our 
balance sheet and deliver the best return for 
our shareholders. We are currently launching 
a strategic review of our international 
courseware local publishing businesses.  
We will report back on this later in the year. 

Drivers for success

There are six key reasons why I believe 
we will succeed:

1   The value of our recent investments, 
including in the Pearson Learning 
Platform (PLP)  G , can now  
be realised. 

2   We are the global experts in 

learning. Nobody else has the 
breadth and depth of experience, 
expertise and relationships across 
the entire lifelong learning spectrum.

3   We are home to the best talent,  
from our amazing, passionate  
and dedicated employees to our 
brilliant authors.

4   We are one of the few companies 
who can offer end-to-end  
learning solutions. 

5   We have a competitive advantage  
in the integration of our intellectual 
property, content, products and 
assessment tools. 

6   Our response to the pandemic 

demonstrated how agile Pearson 
can be. The company responded 
rapidly to the needs of people, 
schools and governments around 
the world.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information12

Chief Executive’s strategic overview

Strengthening our culture 

In any organisation, the internal always 
determines the external. At Pearson we  
have committed employees who really  
care about education and learners, who 
understand every dimension of learning and 
who understand how learning improves 
people’s lives. We see exciting opportunities 
to evolve our culture to capture the full 
potential of the talented people who work  
at Pearson, based around the four key themes 
of: putting the consumer at the centre of 
everything we do; embracing diversity, equity 
& inclusion; collaborating across businesses 
and territories as one global company;  
and increasing our speed, agility and focus  
on quality.

Increasing our societal impact

Pearson has an important role to play when  
it comes to helping address the inequality of 
opportunity in learning around the world.  
Our recent work to promote access and 
inclusion in learning includes the launch of our 
social bond earlier this year, tied to improving 
learning outcomes for people across the 
world who need it most. We are continuing 
our efforts to achieve diversity across both 
our employee base and within our content 
through representation. We have developed 
a roadmap to become net carbon zero;  
and we are also enhancing our reporting 
structures and are reporting according to 
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 
(SASB) for the first time this year. 

Being a sustainable business will contribute  
to Pearson’s future growth and we are 
committed to making a positive impact. Read 
more on our approach and our Sustainable 
Business Plan 2030 in the Sustainability 
section of this report, on pp40–55 

Andy Bird discusses  
Pearson’s strategy  
at the full year  
2020 results

MARKET OPPORTUNITIES 

The rise in online and 
digital tools for schools 
and education

The workforce skills gap

The growing need  
for accreditation  
and certification

Our guiding principles
Our strategy reflects a new vision for Pearson 
and incorporates a simpler, more agile 
operating model focused on three global 
market opportunities where we can leverage 
our existing expertise, build on our 
investments in technology, and strengthen 
our areas of competitive advantage to 
reposition Pearson towards sectors and 
opportunities that offer strong inherent 
growth characteristics. All of this will be 
achieved with our new guiding principles:

  We will put the consumer at the centre of 
everything we do and provide them with  
the highest quality and best value products

  We will only be in businesses that will  
drive growth, scale, profitability and 
shareholder value 

  We will have the capabilities to deliver, 
including an entrepreneurial culture,  
diverse talent and effective technology 

  And finally, we will move with speed  
and agility

Our strategy and business model

Use this QR code to visit our 
strategy and business model 
page on our newly-launched 
corporate website.

What the future holds
This is an exciting time for Pearson and  
I believe that our future success will be  
driven by the following five things:

1.  The learning market is vast and growing, 
and 2020 was the catalyst to help both 
individuals and organisations change the 
way they saw the need to learn and change 
how they learn

2.  Pearson has great assets, and the 
investments we have made in our 
technology will enable us to grow our 
existing businesses and make them  
even more valuable 

3.  We will build direct relationships with our 
consumers that allow us to support them 
across their entire lifetime of learning 

4.  We can help companies address the 

persistent skills gaps and massive shifts in 
the workforce that they face, which opens 
up a huge new market for us 

5.  We have a unique competitive advantage. 
No one else can offer the highest quality 
content, the best digital products and 
delivery, and the world-leading assessment 
capability that the market and our 
consumers demand 

Simply put, we intend Pearson to be the 
world’s preeminent learning company, 
delivering world-class learning products to 
more people than ever before. This is good  
for our business, and it is good for the world. 
Because, when we demonstrate the value  
of learning, we grow our business and 
transform lives. 

I look forward to the journey ahead and 
sharing our progress with you as we go. 

Thank you for your support of Pearson.

Andy Bird 
Chief Executive

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationOnline and  Digital ToolsWorkforce SkillsAccreditation and  Certification13

Living our values: our response to COVID-19

Supporting our  
customers

We made the decision early on 
that it was the right course of 
action to help customers the 
best we could by taking their 
courses and classes online –  
on a free bases initially – to help 
cope with the crisis and help 
keep them learning.

We increased the safety of our 
test centres by following social 
distancing measures.

We believe that our early 
decision to help our customers  
in their time of need will lead to 
strengthened, more durable 
long-term relationships with  
our customers.

UK

US

Global

3.6m+ 

480,000+

100,000

500+

school children 
accessed 
subscriptions  
to ActiveLearn 
online resources

Pearson VUE  G
-owned 
professional testing 
centres opened to 
help thousands  
of key workers 
qualify and  
provide front-line 
healthcare support

parents accessed  
Carol Vorderman’s 
‘The Maths Factor’

500,000+

people accessed 
upskilling and 
reskilling 
opportunities  
on UK Learns

K-12 students  
were offered free 
access to our online 
courseware and 
learning platform 
through state-level 
district partnerships

1.5m

people viewed our 
online learning hub 
to help adjust to 
online learning

Supporting our people

With the onset of the pandemic  
in early 2020, we acted quickly to 
support our 20,000+ employees, 
helping them feel connected and 
safe as the majority of them found 
themselves suddenly working from 
home full time.

COVID-19 Online Community

We launched an 
online community  
to help employees 
navigate their  
‘new normal’.  
Events included: 

  Regular virtual 
town halls  
and leadership 
engagement events

  Weekly virtual 
coffees and 
manager meet-ups 

Our new quarterly 
pulse survey found 
that employees 
appreciated our 
response and 
support during  
the year.

People of Pearson

We launched an employee engagement 
community for employees to connect,  
share stories and support one another. 

You can meet some of our talented  
colleagues throughout this report in the 
People of Pearson callouts. 

Learning at Work Week

Employee value proposition

More than 11,000 
employees took part 
in our first global 
Learning at Work 
Week, during which 

we hosted a virtual 
programme of 
speakers and 
seminars.

We are currently 
focusing on 
embedding our 
employee value 
proposition in 
everything we do, 

with the aim of 
building a more 
inclusive learning 
culture in order to 
attract and retain the 
world’s best talent. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information14

Market context

A vast, expanding market

The fundamental 
growth drivers of the 
education market 
remain robust

  Accelerating adoption of digitally 
enabled learning across all lifelong 
learning journeys

  Increased attention on employee 
training, upskilling and reskilling  
to meet evolving labour market 
needs, often with government-led 
initiatives

  Emerging trend of people looking 
for alternative credentials 

  Parents spending more on direct 
to consumer education services

The global learning 
opportunity

£7tn

2nd

+1bn

expected size of  
the learning  
market by 2030

largest component 
of GDP in most 
countries

We expect over a 
billion learners  
to have moved 
through formal 
education  
by 2030

The £5tn global learning market

4.4%

CAGR

Lifelong learning

Corporate 

75%+

Formal primary,
secondary and
tertiary education
market

2010 A

2015 A

2018 A

2025 E

2030 E

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information15

Global Learner Survey 2020 

Pearson’s Global Learner Survey reveals that 
people see longevity in online learning, 
increasing demand for digital skills and  
equity as one of education’s biggest issues 

Learning is  
forever changed

77%

66%

88%

of learners believe  
that education will 
fundamentally 
change because  
of COVID-19

agree that the 
education system  
in their country has 
done a good job 
adapting during  
the pandemic

say online learning 
will be part of 
primary, secondary 
and higher 
education  
moving forward

Getting schooled  
on the new economy

77%

87%

say teleworking has 
taught them that 
digital work requires 
new skill sets

 Virtual collaboration

 Communication

 Analysing data

  Managing  
remote teams

agree that colleges 
and universities 
should offer shorter 
courses or lower-cost 
options to help those 
who are unemployed

Learners demand 
equity now

More tech for  
underserved learners

Better prep for emergency 
use of online learning

More academic  
resources

More remote  
learning solutions

70%

88%

want schools to do 
more to address 
equality issues

believe that the 
pandemic will 
deepen education 
inequality,  
especially among 
young students

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information16

Our business model

Our value creation model

Our foundations

What we do

Committed people  
and partners

From our amazing, passionate and dedicated 
employees to our brilliant authors, we are the home 
for the best talent. We have a broad range of partners 
across our business who we expect to share our 
Pearson values. Our relationships with governments, 
customers, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) 
and other global organisations help us to increase 
our impact on consumers around the world.

R&D and  
product innovation

Our global product team, with expertise in learning 
science, has a focus on learning outcomes. 
Through ongoing innovation and Research and 
Development (R&D) we are committed to creating 
learning products which offer a great user 
experience (UX) and that demonstrate  
measurable learning progress. 

Financial assets

Our shareholders entrust us with their capital in 
order to invest on their behalf for the long term.

Our physical  
footprint

We have a presence in c.200 countries around the world 
and are focusing on simplifying our property portfolio  
to enable digital and flexible ways of working.

We’re the 
global experts 
in learning

Nobody else has the breadth and depth of 
experience, expertise and relationships in 
learning. We enable tens of millions of 
learners per year across the world and  
the entire learning spectrum.

We’re the  
only company 
to offer  
end-to-end 
learning 
solutions 

From identifying a person’s learning needs 
and helping them to achieve them, to 
assessing their performance and granting 
credentials. We create Intellectual Property 
(IP), turn it into compelling content, and then 
leverage it as we build the tools for teaching 
and assessment.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information17

An integrated 
business

Our competitive advantage is the integration of our IP, content, 
products and assessment tools across our five businesses –  
a continuous flywheel that makes each part of our business  
more valuable. For example, we create the most effective and 
valuable learning tools and experiences for learners of all  
ages. We develop the exams and assessments to test their 
performance and then we certify their achievement so that  
they can prove what they’ve learned. 

IP

Content

Assessment 
tools

Product

Learn more:

Our strategy and  
five new business 
divisions, pp18–25

Value we create

Consumers

Educators

We work with teachers, 
instructors, faculty and 
educators across all stages 
of education to improve 
outcomes, grow and 
succeed together. 

Governments

We partner with 
governments at a local, 
federal and national level to 
create learning solutions for 
people around the world. 

Shareholders

We aim to provide 
long-term shareholder 
value creation.

Business partners

Our long-term business 
partnerships are built  
on shared values,  
deep relationships and 
mutual trust.

We provide superior 
learning products and 
services to meet the needs 
of consumers all over  
the world.

Employees

We intend to maximise the 
value of Pearson’s own 
human capital, by giving  
our people as many 
opportunities to learn as 
possible, enabling our 
employees to grow,  
develop and succeed.

Employers

Companies are the 
universities of the future. 
Our aim is to partner with 
more employers to create 
shared success and to 
ensure more people 
succeed in the future  
world of work. 

Learn more:

Creating value for 
our stakeholders, 
pp27–29

Society

Planet

Education plays a crucial 
role in society and Pearson 
is a driving force behind 
the evolving education 
market as we look to meet 
the changing needs of 
today’s learners, not just in 
this moment but for the 
foreseeable future.

We have a roadmap to 
become net carbon zero 
across our global business 
and we are enhancing  
our reporting structures, 
reporting according 
to Sustainability Accounting 
Standards Board (SASB) 
principles for the first time 
this year. 

Learn more:

Sustainability, 
pp40–55

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information18

Our strategy

Repositioning Pearson  
for growth to seize  
the global opportunity

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information19

MARKET OPPORTUNITIES 

The rise in online and 
digital tools for schools 
and education

THREE PRIORITIES TO UNLOCK GROWTH

The workforce skills gap

The growing need  
for accreditation  
and certification

Consumer focused & 
data-led approach

Portfolio & 
Organisational structure

Talent & culture

FIVE BUSINESSES TO DRIVE GROWTH

VIRTUAL LEARNING

HIGHER 
EDUCATION

ENGLISH 
LANGUAGE 
LEARNING

WORKFORCE 
SKILLS

ASSESSMENT & 
QUALIFICATIONS

p20 

p21 

p22 

p23 

p24 

Direct to Consumer

Enabling  
sustainable growth

Driving  
shareholder value

Contributing to a more 
equitable world

GUIDING PRINCIPLES TO BENCHMARK SUCCESS

  Consumer at the 
centre of everything 
we do

  High-quality, 
affordable products 
leading to better 
access and 
outcomes 

  Scalable, global  
and digital-first 
businesses that  
are profitable  
and will drive 
shareholder value

  Speed and agility

  Entrepreneurial 
culture, diverse 
talent and effective 
technology

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information20

Our five new business divisions

We are reorganising Pearson to focus on five new business divisions1, all supported by our Direct to 
Consumer group. Each division will have full responsibility for its overheads, product development,  
and operations to enable a more agile and transparent operating model, and each will be linked  
to the others through our shared IP and capabilities.

s
n
o
i
s
i
v
i
D

s
t
i
n
U

VIRTUAL LEARNING

HIGHER EDUCATION

ENGLISH LANGUAGE 
LEARNING

WORKFORCE SKILLS

ASSESSMENT & 
QUALIFICATIONS

  Virtual Schools
  Online Program 
Management (OPM)  G

  US Higher Education 
Courseware 
  Canadian Higher 
Education Courseware 
  International Higher 
Education Courseware

  Pearson Test of  
English  G
  Institutional 
Courseware
  English Online 
Solutions

  BTEC  G
  Pearson College
  Apprenticeships

  Pearson VUE
  US School  
Assessment  G
  Clinical Assessment 
  UK GCSE and A Level
  International academic 
qualifications

Virtual Learning

Direct to Consumer

Pearson’s Virtual Schools are 
an accredited, online public  
and private school programme 
providing personalised learning 
and a high-quality alternative 
to bricks and mortar schools.

Our OPM business helps 
people choose and study the 
right course to enhance their 
employability prospects,  
and universities and colleges  
to expand their reach by  
taking courses online.

Revenue
£0.7bn

2020 revenue

Market size
£1.5bn

£2.8bn

Virtual Schools,  
US market

OPM global 
market, 2021

Virtual schooling is a £1.5bn market  
in the United States alone, with  
market growth of high single digits 
pre-COVID-19. In 2019, the total US 
virtual school enrollment was around 
400,000 students, which represented 
only 1% of the entire K-12 population. 
We believe the total addressable market 
will continue to show good growth as 
more school districts retain online 

schooling post-COVID-19 and as more 
parents opt for virtual schooling 
permanently, growing that market size 
beyond the 1% that it is today. We have 
a 17% share of the market today and  
are present in 29 of the 34 states that 
currently allow virtual public schools.  
In 2020 our Virtual Schools revenue  
was £413m following significant growth 
of 29%, driven by COVID-19.

In OPM we continue to expand our 
relationships with institutions to be 
broader in scope; we will leverage our 
in-house digital marketing agency 
across other parts of the business;  
and, we will accelerate our Pearson 
Pathways strategy to grow our 
presence in lifelong learning. The global 
OPM market, at £2.8bn today, is 
expected to grow to over £7bn as 
consumers increasingly turn to online 
course solutions in 2020 our revenue in 
OPM was £0.3bn.

1  The divisions presented here exclude the international courseware local publishing businesses which are under strategic review.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information21

Higher Education

We offer high-quality digital 
content to college students 
focusing on experience, 
outcomes and affordability.

Revenue
£0.9bn

2020 global 
revenue

Market size
£4–5bn 

US Courseware 
market

The US higher education courseware 
market is valued between £4bn and 
£5bn, and we are the leading player 
with revenue of £0.8bn in 2020. We 
partner with thousands of leading 
authors, across multiple subjects,  
with a very strong focus on science, 
technology, engineering and 
mathematics (STEM). We’re accelerating 
our move to digital and we have an 
opportunity to recapture the secondary 

market in Pearson textbooks. The PLP 
and the products we are developing on 
it will drive digital growth. To accelerate 
recapture from the secondary market 
and build direct relationships with 
consumers, we are going to launch a 
new college study app in the autumn of 
2021 which will be competitively priced, 
flexible, and a tiered service, which will 
enable us to shift consumer purchasing 
preference to our own platform.

PEARSON REVEL OUR FOCUS ON LEARNER OUTCOMES

Essential 
programming

Improving outcomes through 
Revel  G : Introduction to  
Java Programming

Learn more online:

Pearson Revel

Mark Armstrong – a computer science 
instructor at the University of North 
Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG) – teaches 
an introductory computer science course 
emphasising problem-solving and software 
design principles. Mark chose to teach  
Java based on employability trends as job 
descriptions consistently list Java as an 
essential requirement for programmers. 

 Revel for programming is designed to 
gently scaffold users from reading about 
programming to writing their programmes 
from scratch. Immediate feedback helps 
students persist productively, especially 
when coupled with unlimited attempts in 
an authentic real-world programming 
environment. Using a sample of UNCG 
students who took the course using Revel, 
our recent study shows that this focus on 
the design of Revel paid off as students 
were persistent on the challenging 
programming tasks.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information22

Our five new business divisions

English Language Learning

We help people achieve their 
full potential in life through 
improved English proficiency, 
by providing engaging and 
personalised learning and 
assessment experiences.

We aspire to become the world’s leading 
brand for people who need to learn or 
improve their English. There are over 
1.5bn adults learning English today  
in a market we estimate is sized at 
c.£5.0bn and set to grow to £7.3bn  
by 2025. Our revenue was modest in 
2020 but we own assets which we are 
confident we can quickly scale. The 
Global Scale of English, a leading global 
measurement standard, enables people 

to gauge and track their progress in 
English. The Pearson Test of English,  
a digital test with AI scoring that 
provides fast, accurate, secure and 
unbiased results, leverages the global 
footprint of our VUE test centres and is 
a trusted brand for entry into higher 
education and a gateway to immigration 
recognised by regulators in the main 
receiving countries.

PEARSON TEST OF ENGLISH – ACADEMIC DIRECT TO LEARNER EXPERIENCES

Mary chose to take PTE as her English 
language test as it was such a seamless 
online experience, from booking the test 
through to taking it. Having got the result 
she needed, using lots of tips from the  
PTE practice app, Mary can now focus 
purely on getting ready for her move to 
Western Australia. 

Speaking about her hopes for her new life, 
Mary said: “I hope to get a full-time job 
teaching in a primary school, a lovely 
apartment with a balcony, spend lots of 
time outdoors with friends and gain lots of 
new experiences. I hope to feel settled and 
happy building a life for myself around 
sunny Perth.”

PTE

The gateway  
to a new life

For Mary Adam, a teacher from 
Scotland, taking the Pearson 
Test of English – Academic has 
been the gateway to a new life 
down under

Learn more online:

Pearson Test of English – 
Academic

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationRevenue£0.2bn2020 revenueMarket size£5bn1 Global market1 Pearson estimate.23

Workforce Skills

This business will focus on 
partnering with companies  
to provide education and 
qualifications to maximise  
the value of human capital  
in the workplace. 

Currently Pearson has a nascent 
presence in this sector with revenue of 
just over £0.1bn but our ambition is to 
become a leader in high-quality learning 
and assessment that supports career 
progression, helps people unlock  
their talent and drives growth for  
our customers’ businesses. 

We are forging new partnerships  
with corporations and other learning 
providers that apply our deep expertise 
in learning design and assessment to 
create learning solutions that truly meet 
employers’ and employees’ needs.

BTEC

DIRECT TO LEARNER EXPERIENCES

The sky’s  
the limit

BTEC qualification has helped 
Marium to reach new heights

Learn more online:

BTEC

Marium Shafique took a BTEC Level 3  G
Extended Diploma in Business at Nelson & 
Colne College achieving a triple distinction. 
Marium arrived in the UK from Italy in 2015 
with limited spoken and next to no written 
English. Her journey to Lancashire School 
of Business and Enterprise has been 
meteoric, testament to her intelligence, 
passion and devotion.

Marium proactively pleaded with her 
college to skip BTEC Business at Level 2, 
to progress faster. Given her chance, she 
excelled at Level 3, achieving distinction 
grades in every unit of study.

Her fierce passion for business started at 
an early age. “Helping my father out on my 
family’s jewellery stall was where my love 
for enterprise started,” explains Marium. 
“I’ve always loved the idea of studying 
business because it has so many areas,  
so I loved everything about my BTEC.” 

BTEC has reshaped Marium’s career focus. 
This exceptional student now hopes to 
pursue a career in the banking and finance 
sector in a strategic managerial position 
with the ambition to go “as high as I can”. 

BTEC

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationRevenue£0.1bn2020 revenue Market size£280bn+Global workforce learning market £100bn+US market24

Our five new business divisions

Assessment & Qualifications

We partner with governments, 
schools, employers and 
professional bodies to  
deliver high-stakes testing  
and qualifications. 

Revenue
£1.1bn

2020 revenue

Market size
£25bn

Global 
assessment 
market

Our Assessment & Qualifications 
business delivered revenue of £1.1bn  
in 2020 and operates in a global market 
of £25bn growing at 5% per year. 
Everything that we do across the 
company has the potential to lead to 
some form of assessment, qualification 
or certification, and this continues to be 
a significant opportunity for Pearson. 
Our US School Assessment business 

continues to win new contracts and 
maintain a strong market position. 
Pearson VUE develops, manages  
and delivers computer-based testing 
programmes for nearly every industry. 
Our investment in remote and online 
proctoring services enabled tenfold 
growth in 2020 to 2.1m assessments. 
We provide technology certification 
exams in the academic, career and 

technical education space. We are  
also the market leader in clinical 
assessment.

Furthermore, we develop and award 
highly sought-after UK academic and 
vocational qualifications, with leading 
brands such as Pearson Edexcel.

PEARSON VUE

DIRECT TO LEARNER EXPERIENCES

Supporting  
the front line

Delivering safe exams for 
much-needed nursing 
candidates during COVID-19

Learn more online:

Pearson VUE

When the COVID-19 pandemic began 
overwhelming healthcare facilities, 
affecting nurses and doctors in the field,  
a brave generation of aspiring healthcare 
professionals stepped up to join their 
overworked colleagues on the front lines. 

Pearson VUE and the National Council  
of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)  
came together to help thousands of 
candidates move into the field quickly.  
By implementing new health and safety 
protocols at all Pearson VUE owned test 
centres, nursing candidates were able  
to gain their licensures during the 
pandemic and begin work to save lives  
in their communities. 

“We needed more nurses in the workforce 
to meet the needs at the front line, without 
compromising patient safety. Pearson VUE 
helped ensure that we delivered a valid  
and secure exam in a safe environment,” 
says NCSBN Test Development Director 
Jason A. Schwartz, MS. “Pearson VUE hired 
and trained more than 700 new staff and 
opened 10 high-capacity temporary test 
centres to accommodate a larger number 
of candidates.” 

Pearson VUE continues to practise strict 
COVID-19 protection policies for test takers 
that follow government guidance, while 
delivering licensures and certifications  
for healthcare workers globally. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information25

Cutting-edge 
technology

Reinventing learning  
experiences to impact  
outcomes throughout life

PEARSON LEARNING PLATFORM DIRECT TO LEARNER EXPERIENCES

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationConsumers of all types want engaging learning experiences that positively impact outcomes that matter to  them, whatever the subject or topic at hand. The Pearson Learning Platform (PLP), a foundational platform that Pearson products sit on, is the technology solution that is delivering next-generation digital experiences,  as part of our digital-first, customer-focused strategy. For example, the new Revel application that launched on the platform has enhanced capabilities for higher education instructors while improving the overall experience for students. Specifically, the Enhanced Revel experience provides assignments and assessments that are more flexible and easier to implement, and performance dashboards and insights that allow instructors to focus on challenging concepts for individual students.In addition, the PLP has supported the transformation of Pearson.com into a direct to consumer destination that now offers a variety of learning products and services. Now, higher education students have direct access to hundreds of Pearson eTexts with refined digital features. The site also has one-click, end-to-end technology training courses for aspiring or experienced technology professionals, to start or advance their careers. “Pearson’s many technology systems, products and services have been brought together under the PLP to achieve a common goal – the creation of consumer-focused learning experiences that will open opportunities and transform lives,”  said Ishantha Lokuge, Pearson  Chief Global Product Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer. “We’re off to a tremendous start  and will continue building our consumer relationships and inventing learning experiences.”26

Learner outcomes

At Pearson we understand that, in a year where education  
has been turned on its head, our commitment to and focus  
on learner outcomes has never been more important.

Our approach
You can see examples of our approach to learner outcomes in our strategic report.

Pearson Revel, p21 

Connections Academy, 
p37 

Watson-Glaser 
Critical Thinking 
Appraisal, p38 

BTEC, p39 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationContinuously improving our impact on outcomesIn practice, when we talk about our ‘focus  on learner outcomes’, this refers to our commitment to identifying the outcomes  that matter most to consumers, designing products to improve those outcomes, measuring and continuously improving the impact that using our products can have.Our commitment to efficacy in learning is  part of how we fulfil our mission as a company: to help people make progress  in their lives through learning.Commitment to learner outcomesIn 2013, we made a public commitment to start reporting on the impact on learner outcomes of our products and services.  To date, we have published a total of 16 independently assured and peer-reviewed Efficacy Reports and a further seven Assessment Efficacy Reports focusing on  the fitness of our assessments for a given purpose. These reports set the standard for transparent reporting across the sector.At the same time, we have been expanding our focus on outcomes to include the product design process – ensuring that we design for efficacy from the inception of a product. This means: specifying the learner outcomes for new products and services; studying related learner science evidence of what works to improve learning; and using that evidence to inform the design of the product or service.Activity this yearWe have released a number of Efficacy Reports this year covering a range of our  key products, including a focus on Revel,  our market-leading product for US college students. In the Revel report, we were able to use a bigger data set than in previous Efficacy Reports to demonstrate the impact of using the product on nearly 7,500 students across 321 different courses. This allows us to generalise the results of the study with greater confidence and gives a real sense of our aspiration to complete impact evaluation at increasing scale.Investing in scales and frameworksIn addition, we continued to invest this year in further developing scales and frameworks to support designing for outcomes that matter most to learners and educators. These tools, in combination with our outcomes-focused approach to product development, enable  us to design quality products that stand out  in the market. These tools include: Global Scale of English, which helps English language learners understand the level of their language and the progress they are making with their learning Personal and Social Capabilities framework, which supports our product development teams to create content to teach and assess essential ‘soft’ skills such as collaboration, critical thinking, leadership and social responsibility (see pp40–55 for our sustainability section)Supporting new product developmentIn 2020, we also supported the learning  design underpinning new products in development, including Career Courses which offerearly-careerprofessionalsaffordableaccess to the skills and experiences they  need to stand out, secure high-value jobs  and progress faster in their careers.Plans for 2021We want to build on this year’s work by integrating learner outcomes even more deeply into our product design approach, especially with any new direct to consumer offerings.Wewillalsocontinuetoincrease the scale of our impact measurement by using bigger data sets to examine what is working for more consumers of our products.In addition, we will publish another  EfficacyReportfocusingonConnectionsAcademy G.Thisbuildsonthefindingsfromthe original report in 2018. Other planned EfficacyReportswillcoverproductsfrom our Clinical, Assessment, and UK Qualificationsbusinesses.We are continuously seeking ways to improve and evolve everything we do by listening to feedback and being open to revising our  own approach. We welcome feedback to  efficacy@pearson.com.Learn more online:plc.pearson.com/en-GB/purpose/improving-outcomes-for-life27

Creating value for our stakeholders

Strengthening the link with our stakeholders  
during challenging times.

In practice:  
Our approach  
to stakeholder 
engagement

Supporting our employees
At the height of the pandemic, we made 
the decision to support our employees  
by not furloughing them, and instead 
where possible redeploying them to 
areas of high demand across the 
business. We also supported our 
customers by providing them with  
digital products and services for free  
to help them move online.

More broadly, as the global social justice 
movement gained momentum, we 
wanted to demonstrate our commitment 
to tackling systemic racism. In addition  
to town halls and listening sessions to 
discuss race, we created a task force to 
articulate our DE&I strategy for our 
products, employees and broader 
external stakeholders. We gave our  
US employees Election Day off as well  
as volunteer days to help further social 
justice causes in their communities, 
made significant changes to our editorial 
and hiring policies, and set the stage  
for Pearson’s future work in this area. 
DE&I strategies are intrinsic to creating  
a stronger, more sustainable business  
for all our company stakeholders.

Learn more about our integrated approach:

DE&I 

p50

Directors’ duties statement 

p30

Board engagement with 
stakeholders

p80 

People of Pearson

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationAn unprecedented yearThe world of education has changed rapidly  as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, while awareness of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I) issues has increasingly been elevated  in the public eye. This has served to highlight the critical role education plays in society – and the important role of technology in helping provide continuity, opportunity and access to learning. Pearson is a driving force behind the evolving education market as we look to meet the changing needs of today’s learners, not just in this moment but for the foreseeable future.Turning points in engagementFrom a stakeholder engagement perspective, we see the COVID-19 pandemic and the rising social justice movement as turning points, heightening the link between society and  the corporate world. Companies and individuals will be remembered for what they did during this unprecedented time in history. Our approach has been informed by this philosophy in terms of behaving responsibly and being a good corporate citizen.The select examples on the following pages highlight our approach to engaging with stakeholders – to not just respond but to  lead and co-create solutions to these  complex, unprecedented issues as they evolve. We believe our early decision to help our customers in their time of need will lead  to strengthened, more durable, long-term relationships. We also believe this will enable us to meet the accelerating interest in online learning while continuing to meet important societal needs in a valuable, sustainable way. Engagement and sustainabilityStakeholder engagement always takes place through the lens of sustainability, which informs and influences our approach across our global operations. Our Sustainable Business Plan 2030 focuses on the areas  that are most important to our stakeholders – learning for everyone, learning for a better world, and leading responsibly. Our approach on these three foundational pillars has been heavily informed by the stakeholder engagement ‘materiality study’ undertaken in 2019. I love to express new ideas  and learn from others who  think differently than myself.Ev Kent Sales Consultant, Higher Education Arkansas, USA28

Creating value for our stakeholders

Consumers

Pearson helps tens of millions of 
people across the world to make 
progress in their lives through 
learning. Increasingly, people are 
taking educational choices into 
their own hands. We are working 
to build a direct relationship with 
them, over a lifetime of learning.

88%

Of respondents in our Global 
Learner Survey agree that 
education should take advantage  
of technology to maximise the 
learning experience for students  
of all ages1

How we serve and engage

We regularly talk to and survey 
people of all ages to understand 
how they are incorporating  
learning into their lives beyond  
the traditional classroom. 

Shareholders

We have a broad range of 
investors who entrust their 
capital with us.

543

investor meetings with 

196

institutions in 2020

How we serve and engage

We engage with our investors on  
an ongoing basis. We communicate 
with them regularly, including at our 
financial results presentations, our 
AGM and at investor meetings and 
conferences around the globe.  
We have been able to continue  
with our engagement virtually 
during the pandemic.

Employees

We are currently focusing on 
embedding our employee value 
proposition in everything we do, 
with the aim of building a more 
inclusive learning culture in order 
to attract and retain the world’s 
best talent. 

11,000 

In 2020 we held our first Global 
Learning at Work Week. Across the 
week we delivered 70+ hours of 
learning to 11,000 employees

How we serve and engage

We’re the only global company 
where our employees can unleash 
their talent while helping millions of 
people make progress in their lives 
through learning. 

We believe that DE&I are 
fundamental to who we are. 

Key concerns

In our first quarter employee  
pulse survey, we heard that 
employees wanted more support  
in understanding career pathways, 
navigating learning resources  
and making learning part of their 
work (rather than in addition to  
their work). 

Our response

Global Learning at Work Week was a 
direct response to this. We offered 
everyone access to a wide variety of 
learning opportunities hosted by 
talented colleagues from across 
Pearson and external experts.

This allows us to put consumer 
needs at the centre of what we do, 
building world-class digital products 
that not only deliver amazing 
experiences but also help people 
learn and thrive in the changing 
world of work.

Key concerns

Our second Pearson Global Learner 
Survey shows that learners see 
COVID-19 as a turning point for 
modern learning, with online 
schooling and economic upheaval 
leaving a lasting mark. In the 
pandemic-aware world, economic 
uncertainty will drive more people 
to upskill and reskill for job security.

Our response

We support people across all  
ages, stages and backgrounds of 
education – from schooling through 
higher education and into 
employment and employability.

Our focus is on providing high-
quality virtual and online learning, 
enabling learners to gain the 
credentials and build the skills  
they need to improve their 
employability prospects.

1  Source: Pearson Global Learner 

Survey, 2020

Key concerns

Our shareholder base has a diverse 
range of views covering financial  
and ESG (environmental, social  
and governance) issues. As well  
as these areas, in 2020 there has 
been focus on the impact of  
the pandemic on Pearson’s 
performance, as well as on the  
Chief Executive succession process.

Our response

We have a positive, ongoing  
dialogue with our shareholder  
base. We aim to deliver long-term 
sustainable value for our investors 
and all our company stakeholders. 
We also respond to surveys  
and questionnaires to provide 
information about our  
ESG practices.

Educational 
Institutions  
& Educators

We work with teachers, 
instructors, faculty and educators 
across all stages of education.

63% 

Of US college faculty delivered their 
courses entirely online this fall2

How we serve and engage

We collaborate with educators and 
provide them with the tools they 
need in order to help the next 
generation of learners to be 
successful in their education and 
make progress in their lives.

Key concerns

When the pandemic kicked in, 
schools, colleges and universities 
across the world had a matter of 
days to figure out what the ‘new 
world’ of learning would look like – 
closing physical sites and scrambling 
to go online.

Our response

We made the decision very early on 
that it was the right course of action 
to help our customers – on a free 
basis initially – to deal with the 
immediate crisis and take their 
courses and classes online. 

As a result of this, we have seen a 
large uptake in usage. We believe 
that helping our customers in  
their time of need will lead to 
strengthened, more durable, 
long-term relationships.

2  Source: Pearson Faculty Tech  

Study, 2020

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information29

As well as the stakeholder groups we have direct dialogue with, outlined below,  
we are also are aware of our broader responsibilities to our planet and society at large.

Learn more:

Sustainability, pp40-55

Employers

Pearson works with employers, 
trade associations and industry 
bodies to meet the demands of 
the workforce and equip learners 
with the skills they need to thrive.

79%

Of learning and development 
professionals expect to spend  
more on online learning3

How we serve and engage

We work to increase the link 
between education and 
employment in a variety of  
ways – for example, in our 
Accelerated Pathways business  
in the US, we work with employers 
such as Brinker International  
and ManpowerGroup to help 
provide upskilling opportunities  
for their employees. 

Governments  
and regulators 

We partner with governments 
(local, state, federal, national)  
to ensure learners have access  
to high-quality instruction, 
materials and assessments  
linked to beneficial outcomes, 
including building workforce 
skills. Engagement with statutory 
bodies such as listing authorities 
and financial regulators is key  
to doing business as a listed 
global company.

We offer nationally recognised 
assessment and qualifications, 
micro-certification, online learning, 
and professional badging to support 
the efforts of industry to prepare 
workers for a lifetime of learning.

Key concerns

The pandemic has forced many 
global employers to rethink ways  
of working, the relationship they 
have with their employees, and  
the speed at which they need to 
innovate in order to survive  
and thrive in the future world of 
work and navigate social and 
environmental challenges.

Our response

In response to the pandemic, we 
played a role in the employability 
challenge by rapidly starting up  
UK Learns, a carefully curated 
selection of online courses to help 
workers learn new skills and earn 
qualifications to open up new  
career opportunities and kickstart 
careers stalled by COVID-19.  
We are actively looking to replicate 
this employability service to  
other markets.

3  Source: LinkedIn 2020 Workplace 

Learning Report

Business 
Partners

From technology providers to 
suppliers, channel partners  
to our authors, we have a broad 
range of partners across our 
global business.

c.80% 

Of Pearson global spend derives 
from 470 suppliers

How we serve and engage

We are focused on building 
successful business partnerships 
across the education ecosystem to 
ensure joint success and growth.

Through our focus on the DE&I task 
force, we are working to enhance 
our DE&I credentials – for example, 
we have contacted our authors in 
the US and the UK to ask them to 
voluntarily disclose their diversity 
characteristics. This will allow us  
to set an author diversity baseline 
which we will track going forward.

Key concerns

We share similar goals with our 
partners – from driving business 
transformation to developing 
world-class products; enhancing 
customer experience, adherence  
to data privacy and IT security 
processes; managing risk; increasing 
partnership with diverse defined 
suppliers; promoting supplier social 
responsibility; developing talent and 
more. We expect partners to share 
our values.

Our response

We build relationships with 
world-class partners and suppliers 
for the benefit of all our 
stakeholders. We believe that 
working with partners who share 
our commitments not just to 
best-in-class business practices – 
but also best practice and 
international standards for  
human rights and environmental 
stewardship – strengthens our value 
chain and reduces our business 
costs and risks.

We are committed to building  
strong relationships with political 
and educational leaders at every 
level across the world. We do  
not make policy, rather we share 
best practices and inform the 
policymaking process through  
our knowledge gained from  
our expertise as the world’s  
learning company.

Key concerns

As the COVID-19 pandemic is 
changing life as we know it around 
the world, governments are facing 
new challenges – and potential new 
opportunities – to address inequities 
across healthcare, education and 
the workforce. 

50 

US states and a wide range of global 
markets in which Pearson works 
with government stakeholders

How we serve and engage

Governments and regulators  
set policy to ensure that both 
businesses and consumers are 
provided with the most effective 
legislative frameworks that help 
drive sustainable growth and  
ensure that learners have access  
to affordable education and  
training opportunities. 

As uncertainty around the 
pandemic’s duration continues and 
countries struggle to stabilise their 
economies, policymakers across the 
globe must rise to the occasion to 
formulate innovative solutions 
across each of those sectors.

Our response

Pearson is uniquely situated to 
collaborate with governments 
worldwide to face the disruption 
caused by the pandemic and help 
build innovative solutions to expand 
equitable access to high-quality 
education and job training.

We are working with local and 
national governments to adapt our 
products and services to still fill  
the purpose, need and outcomes 
expected. This includes, for 
example, our work in the UK where 
we continue to work closely with  
the Department for Education  
and the regulator to ensure schools, 
teachers and students are 
supported as Summer exam  
series have been cancelled due  
to COVID-19.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information30

Directors’ duties statement 
Directors’ duties statement 

The Directors of Pearson plc – and those of  
all UK companies – must act in accordance 
with a set of general duties. These duties are 
detailed in the Companies Act 2006 and 
include, in Section 172, a duty to promote  
the success of the company (inset below).

As part of their induction at Pearson, the 
Directors are briefed on their duties and  
they can access professional advice on  
these – either through the company or, if they 
judge it necessary, from an independent 
provider. Typically, in large and complex 
businesses such as Pearson, the Directors 
fulfil their duties partly through a governance 
framework that delegates day-to-day 
decision-making to employees of the Group.

The Board recognises that such delegation 
needs to be much more than a simple 
financial authority and, throughout this 
document, we have summarised: our 
governance framework; the values and 
behaviours expected of our employees and 
business partners, including the standards to 
which they must adhere; how we engage with 
stakeholders, including to understand and 
take into account their views and concerns; 
and how the Board looks to ensure that we 
have a robust system of control and 
assurance processes in place.

In this annual report, we provide examples of 
how the Directors take into account the likely 
consequences of decisions in the long term, 
build relationships with stakeholders, engage 
with employees, understand the impact of 
Pearson’s operations on communities and  
the environment, and attribute importance  
to behaving as an ethical and responsible 
business. In particular, you are encouraged  
to read the following sections of this report, 
which illustrate how the Directors, with the 
support of the wider business, consider  
these matters in the course of their duties, 
although this is not intended to be an 
exhaustive list as such matters are integrated 
throughout this report, including:

  Creating value for our stakeholders 
(pp27–29), which summarises our 
stakeholder groups, how we serve and 
engage with them, their key concerns and 
our response

  The Board’s disclosure, Engagement with 
stakeholders (p80), which summarises:

  how Directors have engaged with employees 
and had regard to employees’ interests

  how Directors have had regard to the  
need to foster the company’s business 
relationships with suppliers, customers and 
others. Pearson considers its key customer 
groups to be Consumers, Educators and 
Educational Institutions and Employers, and 
describes its suppliers as Business Partners 
– we have categorised our engagement with 
these groups accordingly

Section 172 of the Companies Act
In summary, as required by Section 172  
of the Companies Act 2006, a director of a 
company must act in the way he considers, 
in good faith, would most likely promote 
the success of the company for the benefit 
of its shareholders. In doing this, the 
director must have regard, among 
other matters, to:

  the likely consequences of any decisions 
in the long term

  the interests of the company’s employees 

  the need to foster the company’s 
business relationships with suppliers, 
customers and others

  the impact of the company’s operations 
on the community and environment

  the company’s reputation for high 
standards of business conduct, and

  the need to act fairly as between 
members of the company

  Sustainability (pp40–55), which describes:

  how stakeholders were consulted in the 
development of our new Sustainable 
Business Plan 2030, which is ongoing and is 
overseen by our Reputation & Responsibility 
Committee. More detail on this process is 
available in our Sustainability & ESG 
supplement on our website

  the ways in which we engage in respect of 
the social, environmental and economic 
issues that will influence learning

  initiatives through which we strive to 
improve access to quality education for 
underserved and underrepresented groups

  our commitment to leading responsibly  
and creating a culture that prioritises our 
impact on climate change, human rights,  
our employees, DE&I, and socially 
responsible sourcing 

  how we align with widely-accepted 
sustainability frameworks including the 
SASB and TCFD

A continued understanding of the key issues 
affecting stakeholders is an integral part of 
the Board’s decision-making process, and  
the insights that the Board gains through 
engagement mechanisms form an important 
part of the context for all of the Board’s 
discussions and decision-making processes. 

While the Board has taken all stakeholders’ 
views into account when making decisions 
during 2020, it is recognised that engagement 
has been impacted due to COVID-19.  
For additional information on the Board’s 
engagement with stakeholders, see p80.  
In addition, there is a case study on the 
Board’s engagement with employees (p81),  
as well as further information on the Board’s 
decision-making with respect to COVID-19 
(pp78–79 

)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information31

Financial review

In 2021, we expect Group revenue to grow and 
profit to be in line with market expectations.

Sally Johnson 
Chief Financial Officer 

Net interest payable was £61m, compared  
to £41m in 2019. The increase is mainly due to 
interest on tax, with one-off credits recorded 
in 2019 not repeated in 2020, and interest 
charges on the bond raised in June 2020. 

The effective tax rate on adjusted earnings in 
2020 was a charge of 13.7% compared to a 
charge of 16.5% in 2019. The decrease in the 
effective tax rate is mainly due to a benefit 
from the release of tax provisions due to the 
expiry of the relevant statute of limitation. 

Adjusted earnings per share of 28.7p  
(2019: 57.8p) reflects all the elements above. 

Profit and loss statement
In 2020, sales decreased by £472m in headline 
terms to £3,397m (2019: £3,869m) with 
underlying performance reducing sales by 
£386m, portfolio changes reducing sales by 
£55m and currency movements decreasing 
revenue by £31m. Stripping out the impact of 
portfolio and currency movements, revenue 
was down 10% in underlying terms.

2020 adjusted operating profit was £313m 
(2019: £581m) with portfolio changes, 
inflation, and the trading impact of COVID-19 
partially offset by restructuring savings. 
Excluding the impact of foreign exchange (FX) 
and portfolio changes, underlying adjusted 
operating profit was down 40%.

Cash generation
Operating cash inflow decreased on a 
headline basis from £418m in 2019 to £315m 
in 2020, with cash conversion of 101% versus 
72% in 2019. The decrease is largely explained 
by the drop-through of reduced profit offset 
by good working capital management. The 
equivalent statutory measure, net cash 
generated from operations, was £450m in 
2020 compared to £480m in 2019. Compared 
to operating cash flow, this measure includes 
restructuring costs but does not include 
regular dividends from associates. It also 
excludes capital expenditure on property, 
plant, equipment and software, and additions 
to right of use assets as well as disposal 
proceeds from the sale of property,  
plant, equipment and right of use assets 
(including the impacts of transfers to/from 
investment in finance lease receivable).  
In 2020 restructuring cash outflow was  
£38m (2019: £111m).

Statutory results
Our statutory operating profit was £411m in 
2020 compared to a profit of £275m in 2019. 
The increase in 2020 is largely due to the gain 
on sale of Penguin Random House and the 
reduction in restructuring costs, which  
were more than enough to offset the  
impact of COVID-19 and portfolio changes  
on trading profits.

Capital allocation
Our capital allocation policy is to maintain a 
strong balance sheet and a solid investment 
grade credit rating, to continue to invest in  
the business, both organically and 
inorganically, to have a sustainable and 
progressive dividend policy, and to return 
surplus cash to our shareholders. 

Financial summary

Business performance

Statutory results

£ millions

Sales

Adjusted  
operating profit

Operating cash flow

Adjusted earnings 
per share

Net debt

2020

3,397

2019

3,869

Headline 
growth

CER  
growth

Underlying 
growth

£ millions

(12)%

(11)%

(10)%

Sales

(46)%

(46)%

(40)%

313

315

581

418

28.7p

(463)

57.8p

(1,016)

Operating profit

Profit for the year

Cash generated 
from operations

Basic earnings  
per share

Dividend per share

2020

3,397

411

310

2019

3,869

275

266

450

480

41.0p

19.5p

34.0p

19.5p

Headline 
growth

CER  
growth

Underlying 
growth

(12)%

(11)%

(10)%

Throughout this section: a) Growth rates are stated on an underlying basis unless otherwise stated. Underlying growth rates exclude currency movements and portfolio 
changes; b) The ‘business performance’ measures are non-GAAP measures, and reconciliations to the equivalent statutory heading under IFRS are included in the financial 
key performance indicators section on pp212–216 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information32

Financial review

Balance sheet
Net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 0.8x  
(2019: 1.3x). Net debt reduced from £1,016m 
in 2019 to £463m at the end of 2020. Excluding 
leases, net debt reduced from £374m in 2019 
to net cash of £159m in 2020. The decrease  
is largely due to the receipt of proceeds of 
£531m from the Penguin Random House sale, 
the receipt of deferred proceeds of £105m 
from the US K-12 sale, the £48m repayment  
of the loan to Penguin Random House and 
positive operating cash flow of £176m offset 
by interest and dividend payments and the 
cash outflow from the Group’s share buyback 
programme. As a result of the COVID-19 
pandemic, the Group took action to increase 
its liquidity including pausing the share 
buyback programme with £176m of the share 
buyback completed. The Board considers that 
maintaining a very strong balance sheet is 
appropriate, and as such, there are no plans  
to reinitiate the buyback. On 4 June 2020 the 
Group also completed the issuance of £350m 
guaranteed notes maturing on 4 June 2030.

The Group continues to work to protect its 
cash flow and proactively manage working 
capital and, at the end of 2020, the Group  
had approximately £1.9bn (2019: c.£1.1bn)  
in total liquidity immediately available from 
cash and its revolving credit facility (RCF). 

Pension plan
The overall surplus on UK pension plans  
of £429m at the end of 2019 has decreased  
to a surplus of £410m at the end of 2020.  
The decrease has arisen principally due to  
an actuarial loss in relation to retirement 
benefit obligations of the Group. 

Dividend
In line with our policy, the Board is proposing 
a final dividend of 13.5p (2019: 13.5p), flat year-
on-year, which results in an overall dividend  
of 19.5p (2019: 19.5p) subject to shareholder 
approval. This will be payable on 7 May 2021.

Businesses held for sale
In November 2020, the Group announced the 
sale of its interests in Pearson Institute of 
Higher Education (PIHE)  G  in South Africa.  
At the end of December 2020 the assets and 
liabilities of PIHE have been classified as held 
for sale on the balance sheet. The sale 
completed on 5 February 2021. 

  Assessment & Qualifications revenue 
growth as lockdowns and social distancing 
ease. Expect impacted test centres to 
reopen – with social distancing – in April, and 
normal operations to resume progressively 
in H2 2021. US school assessments expected 
to resume, and clinical tests to be taken as 
schools reopen. UK exams cancelled with 
modest profit impact as teacher assessment 
to replace exams

  English Language Learning revenue 
expected to improve as mobility, migration 
and school purchasing recover slowly amidst 
continuing COVID-19 restrictions

  Higher Education revenue to decline, but by 
less than seen in recent years, as the print 
base becomes smaller, and as the pricing 
pressure from the change in mix from print 
and bundles, to platform and eTexts, is 
offset by recapture of the secondary market 
driven by eText growth and the digital-first 
strategy, and enrolment recovery

  Workforce Skills revenue expected to grow, 
given the strong business fundamentals and 
investments made into digital and direct to 
consumer opportunities

  Revenue phasing will be impacted by  
current conditions, with Q1 sales behind a 
challenging 2020 comparative, with growth 
expected in Q2 and Q3 assuming further 
pandemic recovery, with the delivery of 
pent-up testing demand in H2 2020 
providing a tougher comparative

  Net interest charge of c.£65m and a tax rate 
of 18% to 22% 

  As previously announced, cost efficiencies 
expected of c.£50m in 2021

Businesses disposed of
In April 2020, the Group completed the sale  
of the remaining 25% interest in Penguin 
Random House to Bertelsmann SE & Co KGaA, 
generating net proceeds of £531m and 
resulting in a pre-tax profit of £180m.

Following the decision to sell the US K-12 
courseware business, the assets and liabilities 
of that business were classified as held for 
sale on the balance sheet at the end of 2018. 
In March 2019, the Group completed the sale 
of its K-12 business with total gross proceeds 
of £200m including £180m of deferred 
proceeds which included the fair value of an 
unconditional vendor note for $225m and  
an entitlement to 20% of future cash flows to 
equity holders and 20% of net proceeds in  
the event of a subsequent sale. In 2020, the 
Group received ($143m) (£105m) as a partial 
repayment of the vendor note and a payment 
in respect of the full purchase equity interest 
such that the Group is no longer entitled to 
any future cash flows to equity holders or net 
proceeds in the event of a subsequent sale.

On 5 March 2021, we agreed the sale of  
our K-12 Sistemas – COC and Dom Bosco –  
in Brazil to Arco, subject to securing regulatory 
approval and closing.

2021 outlook
We expect year-on-year revenue growth,  
with adjusted operating profit to be in line 
with current market expectations.

  Good growth in Virtual Learning, driven by 
the Virtual Schools 2020/2021 academic year 
enrolment growth. Enrolments for the 
2021/2022 academic year are expected to  
be broadly flat, with the ‘COVID-19 cohort’ 
partially returning to bricks and mortar 
schools, offset by underlying growth, and 
waiting lists. Online Program Management 
(OPM) is also expected to grow.

Long term outlook

Segment

Market 5-year CAGR1

Long-term growth

Long-term margin2

Virtual Learning

High single digit 

Strong

Higher Education

Stabilisation

Recapture of secondary market, 
International growth

Increase

Increase

English Language 
Learning

Mid to high single digit

At least in line with market growth Maintain

Workforce Skills

Mid to high single digit

Strong

Assessment & 
Qualifications 

Professional Certification 
low to mid single digit 

Low to moderate

Maintain

Maintain

US School Assessment and 
Clinical Assessment flat

1  Pearson estimates.
2  vs 2019 margin.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information33

Portfolio
In addition to the pending sale of our K-12 
Sistemas – COC and Dom Bosco – in Brazil,  
we will also be strategically reviewing the rest 
of our international courseware local 
publishing businesses, including Canada.

Key performance indicators
Our financial KPIs will remain the same,  
to maintain focus on growth, profitability  
and cash generation. At our FY 2020 results  
we announced that our key business and 
non-financial KPIs will change to reflect the 
pivot to the new growth strategy, and will 
focus on:

  Digital growth

  Consumer engagement

  Product effectiveness 

  Investing in our talent

  Building an inclusive culture and improving 
diverse representation

  Accelerating our sustainability strategy

We will also report leading indicators against 
our five divisions going forward.

Adjusted performance measures
The Group’s adjusted performance measures 
are non-GAAP financial measures and  
are included as they are key financial 
measures used by management to evaluate 
performance and allocate resources to 
business segments. The measures also enable 
investors to more easily, and consistently, 
track the underlying operational performance 
of the Group and its business segments over 
time by separating out those items of income 
and expenditure relating to acquisition and 
disposal transactions, major restructuring 
programmes and certain other items  
that are also not representative of  
underlying performance. 

The Group’s definition of adjusted 
performance measures may not be 
comparable to other similarly titled  
measures reported by other companies.  
A reconciliation of the adjusted measures  
to their corresponding statutory reported 
figures is shown in summary below and in 
more detail on pp212–216 

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit includes the 
operating profit from the total business 
including the results of discontinued 
operations when relevant. There were no 
discontinued operations in either 2019 or 
2020. A reconciliation of the statutory 
measure to the adjusted measure is  
shown below:

£ millions

Operating profit

Add back: cost of  
major restructuring

Add back: other net (gains)  
and losses

Add back: intangible charges

Adjusted operating profit

2020

2019

411

275

–

159

(178)

(16)

80

313

163

581

In May 2017, we announced a restructuring 
programme, to run between 2017 and 2019, to 
drive significant cost savings. This programme 
began in the second half of 2017 and costs 
incurred relate to delivery of cost efficiencies 
in our enabling functions and US Higher 
Education Courseware business together  
with further rationalisation of the property 
and supplier portfolio. The restructuring  
costs in 2019 relate predominantly to staff 
redundancies. The restructuring programme 
was largely completed at the end of 2019.

These major restructuring costs are  
analysed below:

£ millions

2020

2019

Further efficiency 
improvements in Enabling 
Functions through back  
office change programmes  
in Human Resources, Finance 
and Technology

Adjusting the cost base in  
our US Higher Education 
Courseware business

Further rationalisation of 
property, vendor and  
supplier agreements

Associate restructuring

Total

–

–

–

–

–

(94)

(34)

(29)

(2)

(159)

Other net gains and losses that represent 
profits and losses on the sale of subsidiaries, 
joint ventures, associates and other financial 
assets are excluded from adjusted operating 
profit. Other net gains included in operating 
profit of £178m in 2020 largely relate to the 
sale of the remaining interest in Penguin 
Random House and impairments of assets 
and other costs relating to the disposal of 
Pearson Institute of Higher Education (PIHE). 
Other net gains included in operating profit  
of £16m in 2019 mainly relate to the profit on 
sale of the US K-12 business. 

Charges relating to acquired intangibles and 
acquisitions are also excluded from adjusted 
operating profit when relevant, as these items 
reflect past acquisition activity and do not 
necessarily reflect the current year 
performance of the Group. Intangible 
amortisation and impairment charges in  
2020 were £80m compared to a charge of 
£163m in 2019, as although acquisition activity 
has reduced in recent years and the disposal 
of Penguin Random House has eliminated  
the Group’s share of associate intangible 
amortisation, this has been partly offset by 
accelerated amortisation profiles and 
impairments recorded mainly relating to 
content and contract intangibles in the  
Global Assessments and International 
businesses. In 2019, there was an additional 
£65m impairment charge relating to  
acquired intangibles in the Brazil business 
following a reassessment of the relative risk  
in that market (see also note 11 to the  
financial statements).

Underlying growth rates

Sales decreased on a headline basis by 
£472m, or 12%, from £3,869m in 2019 to 
£3,397m in 2020, and adjusted operating 
profit decreased by £268m, or 46%, from 
£581m in 2019 to £313m in 2020. The headline 
basis simply compares the reported results 
for 2020 with those for 2019. We also present 
sales and profits on an underlying basis which 
exclude the effects of exchange, portfolio 
changes arising from acquisitions and 
disposals and the impact of adopting new 
accounting standards that are not 
retrospectively applied. Our portfolio  
change is calculated by taking account of  
the contribution from acquisitions and  
by excluding sales and profits made by 
businesses disposed in either 2019 or 2020. 
Portfolio changes mainly relate to the sale of 
our US K-12 business in 2019 and the sale of 
our remaining interest in Penguin Random 
House in the first half of 2020. Acquisitions, 
including Lumerit in 2019, had only a small 
impact on reported sales and profits.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information34

Financial review

On an underlying basis, sales decreased by 
10% in 2020 compared to 2019 and adjusted 
operating profit decreased by 40%. Currency 
movements decreased sales by £31m and 
increased adjusted operating profit by £1m. 
Portfolio changes decreased sales by £55m 
and decreased adjusted operating profit by 
£59m. There were no new accounting 
standards adopted in 2020 that impacted 
sales or profits. 

Adjusted earnings per share

Adjusted earnings includes adjusted 
operating profit and adjusted finance and  
tax charges. A reconciliation to the statutory 
profit is shown below:

£ millions

Profit/(loss) for the year

Non-controlling interest

Add back: Cost of  
major restructuring

Add back: Other net gains

Add back: Intangible charges

Add back: Other net  
finance costs

Tax benefit relating to items 
added back

Adjusted earnings

Weighted average number of 
shares (millions)

2020

2019

310

266

–

–

(178)

80

(2)

159

(16)

163

(4)

2

9

(123)

217

449

755.4

777.0

Adjusted earnings per share

28.7p

57.8p

Net finance income relating to retirement 
benefits is excluded as it is considered that the 
presentation does not reflect the economic 
substance of the underlying assets and 
liabilities. The Group excludes finance costs 
relating to acquisition and disposal 
transactions as these relate to future 
earn-outs or acquisition expenses and are  
not part of the underlying financing. In 2020, 
the fair value remeasurement of disposal 
proceeds of £26m relates to proceeds from 
the US K-12 disposal in 2019.

Foreign exchange and other gains and losses 
are also excluded as they represent short- 
term fluctuations in market value and are 
subject to significant volatility. Other gains 
and losses may not be realised in due course, 
as it is normally the intention to hold the 
related instruments to maturity. 

In 2020, the total of these items excluded  
from adjusted earnings was income of £4m 
compared to a charge of £2m in 2019. Net 
finance income relating to retirement benefits 
decreased from £13m in 2019 to £6m in 2020 
reflecting the comparative funding position  
of the plans at the beginning of each year  
and lower prevailing discount rates. In 2020, 
finance income relating to the revaluation of 
the US K-12 disposal proceeds was recorded 
and there were increases in losses on 
long-term interest rate hedges and increases 
in foreign exchange losses on unhedged 
inter-company loans, cash and cash 
equivalents in 2020 compared to 2019. 

The adjusted income tax charge excludes  
the tax benefit or charge on items that are 
excluded from the profit or loss before tax.  
In addition, the tax benefit from tax 
deductible goodwill and intangibles is  
added to the adjusted income tax charge,  
as this benefit more accurately aligns the 
adjusted tax charge with the expected rate  
of cash tax payments.

Operating cash flow
Operating cash flow is an adjusted measure 
and is presented in order to align the cash 
flows with corresponding adjusted operating 
profit measures. A reconciliation to operating 
cash flow from net cash generated from 
operations, the equivalent statutory measure, 
is shown below:

£ millions

2020

2019

Net cash generated  
from operations

Dividends from joint ventures 
and associates 

Capital expenditure on  
property, plant, equipment  
and software (including 
additions to leased assets)

Proceeds from sale of property 
plant, equipment and software 
(including disposal and transfer 
of leased assets)

Investment income

Add back: Costs paid/ 
(proceeds from) major 
restructuring projects

Operating cash flow

450

480

4

64

(195)

(257)

18

–

18

2

38

315

111

418

Operating cash inflow decreased on a 
headline basis by £103m from £418m in  
2019 to £315m in 2020. The decrease is  
largely explained by the drop-through  
of reduced profit due to COVID-19, offset  
by improved working capital. In 2020 
restructuring cash outflow was £38m 
compared to £111m in 2019.

Other financial information

Net finance costs

£ millions

Net interest payable

Finance income in respect of 
retirement benefits 

Fair value remeasurement of 
disposal proceeds

Other net finance costs

Net finance costs

2020

2019

(61)

(41)

6

13

26

(28)

(57)

–

(15)

(43)

Net interest payable in 2020 was £61m, 
compared to £41m in 2019. The increase is 
mainly due to interest on tax, with one-off 
credits recorded in 2019 not being repeated  
in 2020, and interest charges on the bond 
raised in June 2020.

As detailed in the adjusted earnings per  
share section, finance income in respect of 
retirement benefits, fair value measurements 
of disposal proceeds and other net finance 
costs are excluded from adjusted earnings.

Capital risk
The Group’s objectives when managing 
capital are to: 

  maintain a strong balance sheet and a solid 
investment grade rating

  continue to invest in the business organically 
and through acquisitions 

  have a sustainable and progressive  
dividend policy

  return surplus cash to our shareholders 
where appropriate

In response to the COVID-19 outbreak,  
the Group took the decision to suspend the 
share buyback programme, which helped to 
preserve liquidity and maintain the Group’s 
credit metrics. 

The Group is currently rated BBB- (stable 
outlook) with Standard and Poor’s and  
Baa3 (stable outlook) with Moody’s. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information35

Net debt
The net debt position of the Group is set  
out below.

£ millions

2020

2019

Cash and cash equivalents

Investment in finance leases

Derivative financial instruments

Bank loans and overdrafts

Revolving credit facility

Bonds

Lease liabilities

Net debt

1,116

130

11

(3)

–

437

196

15

(3)

(230)

(965)

(593)

(752)

(838)

(463)

(1,016)

The Group’s net debt reduced from £1,016m 
at the end of 2019 to £463m at the end of 
2020. The decrease is largely due to the 
receipt of proceeds of £531m from the 
Penguin Random House sale, the receipt  
of deferred proceeds of £105m from the  
US K-12 sale, the £48m repayment of the  
loan to Penguin Random House and positive 
operating cash flow offset by interest and 
dividend payments and the cash outflow  
of £176m from the Group’s share  
buyback programme. 

Liquidity and funding
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic,  
the Group took action to increase its  
liquidity, including pausing the share buyback 
programme, and on 4 June 2020, the Group 
completed the issuance of £350m guaranteed 
notes maturing 4 June 2030. 

The notes bear a coupon of 3.75% and  
have been issued in accordance with the  
ICMA Social Bond Principles 2018. The 
proceeds will be primarily used to finance  
and re-finance delivery of education in our 
Connections Academy, BTEC and GED  G  
businesses to help achieve the United Nations’ 
4th Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)  
for a quality education. The social bond 
framework is a natural progression of 
Pearson’s long-standing commitment to 
integrating social and environmental 
sustainability into the business. 

In assessing the Group’s liquidity, the impact 
of the COVID-19 pandemic has been modelled 
under several scenarios to ensure that the 
likelihood of a prolonged period of disruption 
has been appropriately considered in 
assessing the availability of funding to the 
Group and the ability of the Group to comply 
with its banking covenants. The Group’s base 
case forecasts include assumptions relating to 
the COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed that 
restrictions ease in Q2 2021 with a phased 
return to normality in H2 2021 as the vaccine 
roll-out progresses. The downside case 

A net deferred tax liability of £30m is 
recognised in 2020 compared to a net £11m 
deferred tax asset in 2019, the movement is 
mainly due to utilisation of tax losses in our  
US business and the amortisation of tax 
deductible goodwill in Brazil which reduces 
the related deferred tax asset. The current tax 
creditor principally consists of provisions for 
tax uncertainties. There are contingent 
liabilities in relation to tax as outlined in note 
34 to the financial statements. 

Other comprehensive income
Included in other comprehensive income are 
the net exchange differences on translation of 
foreign operations. The loss on translation of 
£109m in 2020 compares to a loss in 2019 of 
£115m. The loss in 2020 mainly arises from  
the weakening of the US dollar compared  
to sterling. A significant proportion of the 
Group’s operations are based in the US,  
and the US dollar weakened in 2020 from an 
opening rate of £1:$1.32 to a closing rate at  
the end of 2020 of £1:$1.37. At the end of 2019 
the US dollar had weakened from an opening 
rate of £1:$1.27 to a closing rate of £1:$1.32 
and this movement was the main reason for 
the loss in 2019.

Also included in other comprehensive income 
in 2020 is an actuarial loss of £23m in relation 
to retirement benefit obligations of the Group. 
The loss arises from the unfavourable impact 
of changes in the assumptions used to value 
the liabilities in the plans and, in particular, 
movements in the discount rate. The actuarial 
loss in 2020 of £23m compares to an actuarial 
loss in 2019 of £145m.

In 2020, £70m was recycled from the  
currency translation reserve to the income 
statement in relation to the disposal of 
Penguin Random House.

Post-retirement benefits
Pearson operates a variety of pension and 
post-retirement plans. Our UK Group pension 
plan has by far the largest defined benefit 
section. We have some smaller defined 
benefit sections in the US and Canada but, 
outside the UK, most of our companies 
operate defined contribution plans. 

scenario modelling includes a severe 
reduction in revenue, profit and operating 
cash flow compared to the base case 
assumptions that extends through the  
full three-year period to ensure that the 
Group has adequate resources to manage  
for a prolonged period of disruption. 

In assessing the Group’s viability for the three 
years to December 2023, the Board analysed 
a variety of downside scenarios including a 
severe but plausible scenario where the 
Group is impacted by all principal risks from 
2021 (weighted for probability of occurrence) 
as well as reverse stress testing to identify 
what would be required to either breach 
covenants or run out of liquidity. The severe 
but plausible scenario modelled an impact 
from COVID-19 and other risks which in 
aggregate were significantly greater than seen 
in 2020 continuing throughout 2021 to 2022. 

At 31 December 2020, the Group had available 
liquidity of c£1.9bn, comprising central cash 
balances and its undrawn $1.19bn RCF 
maturing February 2024. Even under a severe 
downside case where further declines in 
profitability compared to 2020 are modelled 
in 2021 and 2022, the Group would maintain 
liquidity headroom in excess of £700m and 
sufficient headroom against covenant 
requirements during the period under 
assessment, even before modelling the 
mitigating effect of actions that management 
would take in the event that these downside 
risks were to crystallise.

Taxation
The effective tax rate on adjusted earnings  
in 2020 was a charge of 13.7% compared to  
an effective tax rate charge of 16.5% in 2019. 
The decrease in the effective rate is mainly 
due to a benefit from the release of tax 
provisions due to the expiry of the relevant 
statute of limitation. 

The reported tax charge on a statutory  
basis in 2020 was a charge of £44m (12.5%) 
compared to a credit of £34m (14.7%) in 2019. 
The statutory tax credit in 2019 was primarily 
due to US tax losses generated on the disposal 
of the US K-12 business. 

Operating tax paid in 2020 was £10m  
(2019: £9m). This was impacted by refunds 
received in the US and UK relating to historical 
periods. Non-operating tax was a refund of 
£12m in 2020 (2019: paid £21m) relating to 
settlement of a historical tax audit and the 
impact of the disposal of our US K-12 business. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information36

Financial review

The charge to profit in respect of worldwide 
pensions and post-retirement benefits 
amounted to £54m in 2020 (2019: £56m),  
of which a charge of £60m (2019: £69m)  
was reported in adjusted operating profit  
and income of £6m (2019: £13m) was reported 
in other net finance costs. The decrease in  
the operating charge in 2020 is largely 
explained by savings in defined contribution 
plans as a result of recent disposals and 
restructuring activities.

The overall surplus on UK Group pension 
plans of £429m at the end of 2019 has 
decreased to a surplus of £410m at the end of 
2020. The decrease has arisen principally due 
to the actuarial loss noted above in the other 
comprehensive income section. In total, our 
worldwide net position in respect of pensions 
and other post-retirement benefits decreased 
from a net asset of £337m at the end of 2019 
to a net asset of £325m at the end of 2020. 

Dividends
The dividend accounted for in our 2020 
financial statements totalling £146m 
represents the final dividend in respect of 
2019 (13.5p) and the interim dividend for  
2020 (6.0p). We are proposing a final dividend 
for 2020 of 13.5p, bringing the total paid and 
payable in respect of 2020 to 19.5p. This final 
2020 dividend, which was approved by the 
Board in March 2021, is subject to approval  
at the forthcoming AGM and will be charged 
against 2021 profits. For 2020, the dividend is 
covered 1.5 times by adjusted earnings.

Share buyback 
The share buyback programme, announced in 
December 2019, commenced on 16 January 
2020 and was paused on 23 March 2020 in 
order to protect liquidity from the impact of 
COVID-19. The original intention was to buy 
back approximately £350m of shares and,  
at the date of pausing the programme, 
approximately 30 million shares had been 
bought back and cancelled at a cost of £176m. 
There are currently no plans to resume the 
share buyback programme. The nominal 
value of these shares, £7m, was transferred  
to the capital redemption reserve. 

Acquisitions
There were no significant acquisitions in  
2020. In 2019, the Group made some small 
acquisitions for total consideration of £40m.

COVID-19
The Group has assessed the impact of the 
uncertainty presented by the COVID-19 
pandemic on the Financial Statements, 
specifically considering the impact on key 
judgements and significant estimates along 
with other areas of increased risk, including 
provisions for bad debt, provisions for 
inventory obsolescence, valuation of 
property-related assets and financial 
instruments. No material accounting impacts 
relating to the areas assessed were 
recognised in the year. The Group will 
continue to monitor these areas of  
increased judgement, estimation and  
risk for material changes.

Related party transactions
Transactions with related parties are  
shown in note 36 of the consolidated  
financial statements.

Post balance sheet events 
On 5 February 2021, the Group completed the 
sale of its interests in PIHE in South Africa. 
Consideration received was nominal.

In February 2021, the Group received charging 
notices requiring payment of materially all of 
the alleged State Aid (see note 34 in the notes 
to the consolidated financial statements for 
further details). A payment of £100m was 
made on 8 March 2021. The Group expects  
to recover the funds in due course.

In February 2021, the Group renegotiated  
its RCF, extending the maturity of $1bn of  
the facility by one year to 2025.

On 5 March 2021, the Group agreed the 
disposal of its K-12 Sistemas – COC and  
Dom Bosco – in Brazil, subject to securing 
regulatory approval and closing. 

On 8 March 2021, the Group announced a new 
strategy including a new divisional structure. 
Going forward the new structure will impact 
segmental reporting and may impact the 
Group’s cash generating units.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationPeople of Pearson

37

Segmental performance1

Revenue grew 18% on an underlying basis  
and 19% on a headline basis reflecting strong 
enrolment growth in Virtual Schools and  
good growth in OPM.

Adjusted operating profit grew 23% in 
underlying terms, due to margin on sales 
growth more than offsetting the investment 
in our virtual schools platform and customer 
care support and margin impact in OPM due 
to discontinued programs. Headline profit 
grew 18% with good growth in adjusted 
operating profit partially offset by FX and 
portfolio changes.

Virtual Schools
Virtual Schools performed strongly driven by 
43% enrolment growth in new and existing 
schools for the 2020/2021 academic year.  
We opened three new full-time, state-wide 
partner schools and, combined with two 
contract exits, this takes the total partner 
schools to 43 in 29 states. We are launching 
two new partner schools in Florida and 
Oregon for the 2021/2022 academic year. 

Online Program Management
In OPM, we saw good sales growth with a 
strong performance in undergraduate and 
international, partially offset by discontinued 
programs. We also saw the benefits of the 
operational changes made earlier this year, 
with increased efficiencies in our student 
recruitment process and student acquisition 
costs. Underlying course enrolments 
(excluding discontinued programs) grew 20% 
and total course enrolments declined 7%.  
We are delivering 470 programs across  
34 partners globally. We launched Pearson 
Pathways, a digital marketplace that provides 
learners with tailored recommendations for 
courses and credentials to help them achieve 
the skills they require.

Global Online 
Learning

Revenue

£697m

+18% 2019: £586m

Adjusted operating profit

£99m

+23% 2019: £84m

CONNECTIONS ACADEMY

OUR FOCUS ON LEARNER OUTCOMES

High performance

Connections outperforms 
other virtual schools  
on reading.
In 2021, we will release an update 
to our 2018 efficacy report for 
Connections Academy, our full-time 
virtual school programme in the US. 
This will take a deeper look at the 
learner outcomes Connections 
students achieve. The original study 
showed that, when adjusted for  
high student mobility and controlled 
for prior student achievement,  
the academic performance of 
Connections students is better  
than other virtual schools for  
reading and equivalent to other 
virtual schools in mathematics.

Learn more:

Connections Academy

1  For all financial metrics in this section please refer to note 2 of the financial statements on p150 where 

adjusted measures for each segment are reconciled to the equivalent statutory measures.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationAs a young black woman and as a part of the LGBTQ+ community,  it is important that I am educated, because in many ways the world is built against me. For me, learning means power, freedom and the breaking of generational curses.  I learn for myself, my family, my ancestors, my future children and the generations to come long after  I am gone.Tori Johnson  Online Program Management  Illinois, USALearning can change who you are, how you think, and essentially,  mould you.Martha Castro HR Business Partner, Human Resources New York, USA38

Segmental performance

Global 
Assessment

Revenue

£892m

(14)% 2019: £1,031m

Adjusted operating profit

£245m

(30)% 2019: £351m

In Global Assessment, sales declined 14%  
on an underlying basis and 13% on a  
headline basis. 

Adjusted operating profit declined 30% in 
underlying and headline terms due to the 
COVID-19 impact on trading, partially offset  
by mitigating actions.

Pearson VUE
Sales declined 10% at Pearson VUE, reflecting 
the impact of the test centre closures in the 
first half of the year, with pent-up demand  
in the second half partially moderated by 
further lockdowns in Q4. Online proctoring 
saw strong growth in the year, with volumes 
up from 0.2 million at the end of 2019 to  
2.1 million at the end of 2020, predominantly 
driven by demand from the IT sector.  
Overall testing volumes were down 22%  
to 12.9 million due to test centre closures. 

School and Clinical Assessment
In School and Clinical Assessment, 
cancellation of spring testing and school 
closures impacted both businesses 
respectively in H1 with a further modest 
impact due to COVID-19 in H2. 

WATSON-GLASER CRITICAL THINKING APPRAISAL

OUR FOCUS ON LEARNER OUTCOMES

Preparing  
for success

Bringing accurate assessment 
of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is essential for success 
in education and the workplace. 
Mentions of critical thinking in job 
postings in the US more than doubled 
between 2009 and 2014. The 
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking 
Appraisal – part of Clinical Assessment 
– assesses information, interprets it 
and draws logical conclusions. 

Thousands of organisations, colleges 
and schools use this to hire great 
managers, develop high-potential 
employees and admit students into 
challenging programmes. Studies 
comparing Watson-Glaser scores with 
a number of on-the-job performance 
indicators have found positive 
correlations suggesting that test-
takers who perform well on the 
Watson-Glaser are also likely to 
perform well at work.

Learn more:

Watson-Glaser

North American 
Courseware

Revenue

£894m

(13)% 2019: £1,091m

Adjusted operating profit

£190m

(20)% 2019: £231m

In North American Courseware, sales declined 
13% for the full year on an underlying basis 
and 18% on a headline basis, reflecting the 
sale of US K-12 Courseware.

Adjusted operating profit declined 20% in 
underlying terms, due to the impact of  
trading partially offset by restructuring and 
discretionary savings. Headline profit was 
down 18% on last year due to the underlying 
profit reduction partially offset by the disposal 
of our US K-12 Courseware business in 2019. 

US Higher Education Courseware
US Higher Education Courseware sales 
declined 12% with total unit sales increasing 
slightly and digital registrations, including 
eTexts, growing 9%. In Canada, courseware 
sales were down significantly due to school 
and bookstore closures. 

We continued to see unbundling of premium 
priced print and digital products for digital-
only formats. In 2020, 2.2m textbooks were 
sold into US Higher Education colleges, 
compared with 3.7m in 2019. Sales of 
standalone eText units into colleges grew  
33% to 3.7 million units, showing signs of 
secondary market recapture. 

There has also been continued momentum  
in Inclusive Access with sales to not-for-profit 
institutions up 29% on last year,  
representing 13% of US Higher Education 
Courseware revenue.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information39

International

BTEC

OUR FOCUS ON LEARNER OUTCOMES

People of Pearson

Job satisfaction

Health and Social Care BTEC 
is a favoured route for the  
key workers of the future.
Since the initial development of the 
BTEC Nationals in Health and Social 
Care, the evidence has been strong that 
these qualifications are fulfilling their 
purpose: to help people get ready for a 
role in the health and social care sector. 
These qualifications allow people to 
select optional areas of study, build  
up to a larger qualification and keep 
options for progression open. Students 
can seek employment after achieving 
the qualification or use it as a stepping 
stone into higher education. In 2019, 
92% of those taking the qualifications 
agreed or strongly agreed that they 
enable them to keep their career 
options open for the future.

Learn more:

BTEC

Enabling 
Functions

Enabling Functions costs were 10% lower  
in headline terms and 9% in underlying  
terms due to restructuring and  
discretionary savings.

Revenue

£914m

(19)% 2019: £1,161m

Adjusted operating profit

£182m

(39)% 2019: £299m

In International, sales were down 19% on an 
underlying basis due to the interruption of 
Australian immigration and test centre 
closures impacting PTE, as well as budgetary 
pressures caused by the impact of COVID-19 
on courseware purchasing. Revenue declined 
21% on a headline basis due to foreign 
exchange and underlying performance.

Adjusted operating profit declined 39% in 
underlying and headline terms due to  
the impact of trading partially offset by 
mitigating actions. 

For School & HE Courseware, budget 
constraints and school closures have led to 
fewer purchases. In the UK, qualifications 
revenue was impacted, as expected, by the 
cancellation of exams in 2020, as well as the 
end of the NCT contract. In our franchise 
business in Brazil and across courseware,  
we have seen market contraction as a result  
of the pandemic.

PTE volumes were down 36% with declines  
in all key markets, except China where we  
saw 17% growth due to an improved 
competitive performance.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationMy curiosity and appetite to learn and experience new places and cultures has taken me to over  30 different countries.Emeka Ibeakanma  Director of Project Management  Melbourne, AustraliaThere’s no better way to live than  to live to change someone’s life  for the better, and the only way to do that is to learn.Rhea Mathur  Pearson Campus AmbassadorIt matters that I learn more  in my role at Pearson, as a  parent and about things that interest me. Learning sustains  my career, my family life,  my interest and imagination.Freya Thomas Monk  Senior Vice President, English Assessment  London, UK 40

Sustainability

Learning for a better life, 
a better world

Through our Sustainable 
Business Plan 2030, we are 
using our assets as the 
world’s learning company 
to help more people create 
a better life for themselves 
and a better world.

Today, individuals, communities and the 
planet face existential crises requiring urgent 
attention. From inequality in education and 
civil unrest to pandemic and climate crisis, our 
planet and our society need an all-hands-on-
deck approach to address these challenges. 

At Pearson, we have a long history of 
contributing to addressing social and 
environmental challenges and upholding  
high standards of ethics and governance. 
From being a founding signatory of the  
UN Global Compact in 2000 to the progress 
we made at the conclusion of our 2020 
Sustainability Plan, addressing environmental, 
social and governance (ESG) issues is part  
of who we are. 

The historic events of 2020 have made our 
commitment to sustainability more important 
than ever. Our work to support our 
consumers and employees throughout the 
COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates who we 
are as company (see p27). The year was also 
marked by an enormous grassroots call for 
social justice and to recover from COVID-19 
with a focus on social equity and the 
environment (see more from our Global 
Learner Survey on p15 

)

Following these pivotal events, we are sharing 
an evolved articulation of the 2030 
sustainability strategy announced last year to 
expand our commitments and ensure we are 
focusing on the areas most important to our 
stakeholders and where we can drive the  
most impact. As part of this evolution, we 
have renamed our pillars to better articulate 
our objectives, though our focus areas  
remain the same.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information41

R EV E R

O
 F
G
N
I
N
R
A
E
L

 Product 

O N E

Y

LEARNIN

G

F

O

Sustainable 
Business Plan 
2030
Helping more people create 
a better life for themselves 
and a better world

R

A

B

E

T

T

E
R
W
O
R
L
D

L

E

 Pla

net 

ADING RES P O N S

Y

e

o

L

B

I

  P

p l e 

Our Sustainable Business Plan 2030 outlines 
our renewed vision: a world of opportunity, 
where every person on the planet has access 
to quality education and lifelong learning that 
empowers them to improve their own lives, 
their communities and the planet. We will 
achieve the better world we envision and 
contribute to long-term business growth 
through focus and tenacious commitment  
to advancing: 

  Learning for everyone: reducing barriers 
and measurably increasing equity for 
underserved groups

  Learning for a better world: leading the 
transformation to build the skills to impact 
society and the planet

  Leading responsibly: creating a culture and 
running a business that prioritises how we 
improve our impact on climate change and 
human rights

2020 highlights
  Introduced a £350m social bond to 
support education for underserved 
groups, see p44 

  Announced our science-based target 
to reduce our GHG emissions by a 
minimum of 50% across scope 1, 2  
and 3 by 2030, see p46 

  Increased transparency through  
new reporting on racial and ethnic 
diversity, Task Force on Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), 
which we have also joined as 
supporters, and Sustainability 
Accounting Standards Board (SASB), 
see p47 and 54 

  Created a ‘report potential bias’  
portal on Pearson.com to encourage 
dialogue about diversity in products 
and services, see p45 

  Added new sustainability-related units 
in BTEC qualifications, see p45 

Our strategy and targets
Our sustainability framework was developed 
based on a materiality analysis that 
considered how Pearson’s business priorities 
and stakeholder expectations have changed 
and are likely to evolve. Our materiality 
analysis was undertaken in consultation  
with Forum for the Future, a well-respected 
sustainability charity. Read more about our 
materiality analysis, as well as additional  

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), in our 
Sustainability & ESG supplement on our 
website at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/purpose/
esg-reporting.

As we approached this work, we have taken 
several key considerations into account: 

  Linking to business priorities: our process 
was designed to align with and support  
our corporate and brand strategy

  Engaging with our stakeholders: we engaged 
with key stakeholders to understand the 
issues most important to them and where 
they expect Pearson to play a role

  Identifying current and future trends: we 
conducted futures research to help identify 
the social, environmental and economic 
issues that will influence learning, our 
ecosystem of partners and Pearson’s 
business in the years to come

  Supporting global goals: we will continue our 
commitment to advancing the UN SDGs 
(especially 4, 8 and 10) and leverage their 
targets and indicators in our goal-setting

Since the launch of the sustainability 
framework in 2020, we continued to make 
progress towards our strategic focus areas 
and collaborated across our company to build 
targets. By design, our new strategy is integral 
to Pearson’s business, and everyone in  
the business will need to play a role in 
achieving the goals. It will require all parts of 
our company, along with external partners 
from businesses, NGOs and governments,  
to achieve our objectives. 

Note: As we embark on a new corporate 
strategy with our five new divisions, our 
approach to sustainability will continue to be 
dynamic and evolve to align with how we can 
best deploy our business capabilities for 
societal impact. Some of our objectives, 
followed by an asterisk (*), are commitments 
to areas we will advance. While we are already 
progressing work in these areas, as outlined  
in this section, we are also working internally 
in 2021 to set measurable and timebound 
targets that will be aligned in scale and match 
the focus areas of our new corporate strategy. 
We will release targets in these areas in our 
2021 annual report or before. 

See table overleaf 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationThe Sustainable Business Plan 2030 creates value for all our stakeholders – consumers, employees, investors, policymakers and others – through our products and services, our partnerships, and how we operate. The Plan and our new corporate strategy reinforce one another, working together to drive both business success and societal impact. Erika Webb-Hughes Vice President, Sustainability  
 
 
 
42

Sustainability

Pearson’s Sustainable Business Plan 2030

Learning for everyone

Learning for a better world

Reducing barriers and measurably  
increasing equity in learning.

Leading the transformation to build  
the skills to impact society and the planet.

Product

Access and inclusion

Sustainability and social responsibility in content 

   We will increase access to learning for underserved 
groups through new and existing products and 
partnerships, identifying strategies to overcome 
barriers. These groups include, but are not limited to, 
women, racial minorities, low-income groups and 
people with disabilities*

Representation in content

   We will strengthen existing and create new processes, 
Editorial Policy, and partnerships to eliminate bias and 
represent the consumers we serve, including based on 
race, ethnicity and gender, in our products and through 
our content providers by 2025

   We will integrate sustainability, social responsibility 
and Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I) knowledge  
and skills into our content, qualifications and online 
programmes, preparing people to make an impact 
in their jobs and lives*

Empowering educators, employees and suppliers

   We will develop and disseminate tools and resources to 
help educators bring sustainability into their classes*

   We will provide opportunities to all employees and 
suppliers to access content, courses and training to 
explore sustainability, social responsibility and DE&I 
issues by 2023

Leading responsibly

Creating a culture and running a business that 
prioritises our impact on climate change and 
human rights. 

People

Human rights

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

   We respect the rights of consumers, employees, suppliers 
and communities, and we consider the human rights 
impact of our business decisions

   It is important that Pearson maintains safeguards of our 
customer data while also working with our customers  
to develop products tailored to their needs

   We are committed to representation at management 
levels of the company that reflects the racial, ethnic  
and gender diversity of the geographies where we 
operate by 2025

   We will source £500m from suppliers who are diverse 
accredited by 2030

   We will work exclusively with suppliers who respect human rights and promote suppliers who champion DE&I

Employees & communities

   Provide opportunities for employees to use their talent to 
contribute to sustainability objectives through both their 
business roles and volunteering

Planet

Net carbon zero 

   We will reduce scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 50% against 
a 2018 baseline as approved by the Science Based Targets 
Initiative by 2030 

  We will be net zero across scope 1, 2 and 3 by 2030

Environmental footprint of products

   100% of paper products will be Forest Stewardship 
Council (FSC) certified by 2025

   We will ensure all products and packaging are widely 
recycled or covered by a take-back programme by 2025

  We will design digital products for energy efficiency

 OurpriorityUNSustainable 

Development Goals 

*  Note: While we are already progressing work in these areas, as outlined in this section, we are also working internally in 2021 to set measurable and timebound targets 

that will be aligned in scale and match the focus areas of our new corporate strategy. We will release targets in these areas in our 2021 annual report or before.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information43

Access and inclusion

  We will increase access to learning  

for underserved groups through new 
and existing products and partnerships, 
identifying strategies to overcome 
barriers. These groups include, but  
are not limited to, women, racial 
minorities, low-income groups and 
people with disabilities

We know that our business focus on delivering 
content direct to consumers is an opportunity 
to impact people from all backgrounds 
globally and improve outcomes. We are taking 
steps to better understand the barriers 
underserved groups are facing and foster 
innovation to refine or create new products 
and delivery channels that will help people of 
all stages and backgrounds overcome their 
learning challenges. We will work to remove 
barriers to education for those most in need, 
both through our core business offering and 
our partnerships, to enable people to reach 
their full potential. 

Some of these groups include people  
from low-income or rural backgrounds, 
first-generation college students, people who 
do not speak an area’s dominant language, 
people with disabilities, underrepresented 
minorities, and adult learners and others 
facing personal constraints, such as the need 
to balance education with work and family 
responsibilities. Supporting these groups is 
central to advancing SDG 4 on education and 
SDG 10 on reducing inequality.

We have a number of products and services 
that are making a difference for key groups. 
Three of these are the focus of our social bond 
launched in 2020 (see p44). Another example 
is Accelerated Pathways, which partners  
with employers to implement educational 
benefits programmes that provide our  
clients’ employees with lifelong learning 
opportunities. These solutions may include 
foundational education skills (including 
reading, writing, English, core job and work 
skills), pathway to a GED, college advising, 

accredited courses, degrees and industry or 
trade certifications. It drives our sustainability 
objective to advance equity by addressing 
many of the unique challenges faced by adult 
learners without adequate and responsive 
educational opportunities. We are leveraging 
the research we already do on learner 
outcomes (see p26) to better understand our 
impact on people from underserved groups.

We are committed to increasing the number 
of BTEC registrations outside the UK, 
particularly in markets where vocational 
education is developing. In 2020, the Group 
had 31,112 registrations outside of the UK, 
which decreased from 43,906 in 2019. The 
decrease in learner registrations is due to 
COVID-19 related institutional closures and 
governments in certain jurisdictions cancelling 
all academic and vocational assessments in 
2020 including BTECs. We recently launched 
our first sustainability-backed loan, linking to 
our progress in increasing access to quality 
vocational education for learners in 
international markets.

Because equity in access to education is a 
massive global challenge, collaborating with 
external partners is critical to making an 
impact. Our strategic partnerships focus  
on combining our business assets and 
capabilities with an external organisation’s 
expertise and reach to create shared value  
for both our business and society.

In 2019, Pearson and CAMFED (Campaign for 
Female Education) adapted our vocational 
BTEC qualification for Learner Guides to make 
it accessible to all the young women acting as 
volunteer ‘Guides’ in CAMFED’s programme: 
not just Guides working in schools but also 
those supporting girls as they graduate 
school, and those mentoring young women  
to set up and grow local enterprises. The 
revisions also reflect a greater emphasis on 
employability skills, and new content has been 
introduced on topics such as sexual and 
reproductive health and information 
technology. In 2020 we awarded 1,225  
BTEC certificates to Learner Guides, who 
successfully completed the programme.

People of Pearson

Learning for 
everyone

Reducing barriers and measurably 
increasing equity in learning.

We want our products and services to  
help more people make better progress – 
regardless of their income level, the way they 
learn or their background. Improving access 
to quality education for more people from all 
backgrounds helps us to grow our business 
and supports our commitment to quality 
education for all, decent jobs and equality  
in line with the UN SDGs.

2020 has been a seminal year for improving 
diversity as events in the US and other parts 
of the world brought race and ethnicity into 
sharp focus. Pearson listened and engaged 
frequently with our employees and 
customers. We also convened a 30+ person 
task force on race and ethnicity to help  
us identify concrete actions to improve 
recruitment, retention and inclusion, and to 
ensure our products and services build a 
more inclusive society. We brought these 
important challenging issues to life through 
global town halls and ongoing discussions 
with employees across the company, 
featuring our own employees, students  
and leadership. The recommendation of this 
task force has been built into our strategy 
pillar on learning for everyone.

Learn more online:

plc.pearson.com/en-GB/purpose/ 
learning-for-everyone

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationI am learning about what I can do to support people who have been marginalised by racism, and support real change. I know that I cannot personally understand many aspects of this movement, but I would like to do this in a way that does not just give lip-service to the issue of systemic racism.James Reeve  Managing Director, Accelerated Pathways  Toronto, Canada 44

Sustainability

PEARSON SOCIAL BOND LINK TO STRATEGY

Investing in equality  
and sustainability

Pearson issues first-of-its-kind social bond, to benefit 
underserved learners through ESG-focused initiatives

Representation in content

  We will strengthen existing and create 
new processes, Editorial Policy, and 
partnerships to eliminate bias and 
represent the consumers we serve, 
including based on race, ethnicity and 
gender, in our products and through  
our content providers by 2025

Editorial policy
To ensure that the content within our 
products is aligned to Pearson’s values,  
and to prevent inappropriate content from 
being published, our Global Editorial Policy 
acts as a guide for content developers to 
create products that are relevant, appropriate 
and inclusive. 

Our policy is based on principles in the 
following areas: 

1  Respecting human rights including freedom 

from discrimination and bias 

2  Creating content that embeds an awareness 

for and the promotion of DE&I 

3  Demonstrating support for learning that is 

based on evidence and facts 

4  Aligning with legal and ethical obligations of 

content creation and production 

5  Ensuring content respects regional laws and 

is not locally inappropriate or offensive 

The Policy is applied across all markets and 
business units, and it is overseen by a 
cross-regional and functional steering 
committee, newly chaired by a manager  
with a specific DE&I content focus. A network 
of policy champions are responsible for 
implementation and act as a point of 
escalation for queries in our businesses and 
markets around the world. The Policy is to be 
reviewed in 2021, and it will continue to be 
overseen by a steering committee and 
implemented by policy champions.

In 2019, we incorporated the Policy into 
Pearson’s Code of Conduct. An online learning 
module is automatically assigned to new 
starters in content-facing and support 
functions and, for external providers, as part 
of our vendor onboarding process. To date, 
over 6,000 employees and 1,500 external 
providers have completed our Global Editorial 
Policy training. Policy checkpoints are 
included in our product development 
processes, and a Policy review of published 
titles has also been established in relevant 
business units. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationIn June, Pearson borrowed £350m in public markets through the issuance of a social bond – the first to be solely linked to education and used globally for virtual learning and teaching  for underserved learners and communities, including those from low-income backgrounds, with disabilities, and the unemployed. The net proceeds will be used exclusively on sustainability-focused initiatives including: Connections Academy, our full-time virtual schools network; BTEC, which provides vocational qualifications and technical training to help learners progress  into the world of work; and the GED which provides the opportunity for US students who did not complete high school to earn a high school equivalency certificate to make further progress in their lives. The bond refinanced maturities  in 2021 and 2022, as well as strengthening the Group’s liquidity during a period where lockdowns were in place in many of the Group’s major markets. Issuing as a social bond allowed the Group to attract  a wider range of investors and demonstrate the Group’s strong  ESG credentials. James Kelly, Senior Vice President  and Group Treasurer said: “We are committed to helping equip learners with the skills they need to enhance their employability prospects and to succeed in the changing world of work. The social bond is an important measure to further strengthen  our long-term liquidity and is a natural progression of Pearson’s long-standing commitment to integrating social and environmental sustainability into our business.” We also created a new Social Bond Framework, setting out how this bond will meet strict criteria and align to  the UN SDGs, which has been assured at the highest level by Vigeo Eiris,  a world leader in sustainable  bond issuances. Learn more online:Social Bond Framework45

Race, ethnicity and gender in content
Key DE&I discipline leads in our product teams 
have completed training on content review, 
and we have released internal guidelines on 
race and ethnicity and gender equality to 
further support our content creators to  
create bias-free content, integrate best 
practices and escalate issues. 

In December 2020 we created a ‘report 
potential bias’ portal on Pearson.com  
to encourage dialogue with students, 
instructors, parents and other consumers 
about Pearson products or services that they 
feel lack diversity, perpetuate stereotypes or 
present bias against any group.

In 2021, we will continue to scale up our 
efforts in this area, including the launch  
of additional training on commissioning  
and reviewing content for inclusion and 
incorporation of our anti-racist principles.

Accessibility and disability
Pearson is committed to continual 
improvement to increase the accessibility  
of our products. Our Global Accessibility 
Steering Group drives support for people  
with disabilities through the intentional 
integration of accessibility standards into 
product development. We have recently 
publicly shared a new Global Accessibility 
Policy Framework.

Learn more online:

Global Accessibility Policy Framework

Pearson has joined the Valuable 500,  
a global movement to put disability on the 
business leadership agenda. As part of our 
membership, we have committed to publicly 
disclose a policy framework for product 
accessibility as well as to build, develop and 
share a market-leading approach to 
mentoring people with disabilities. Pearson 
also announced a formal agreement with the 
National Federation of the Blind to enhance 
the accessibility of Pearson’s educational 
products and courses, deepen Pearson’s 
culture of accessibility, and accelerate the 
effectiveness of Pearson’s accessibility  
efforts broadly. 

See p50 for accessibility for our employees.

sustainable development subject-matter 
knowledge delivered with skills needed to take 
action, and it fosters socially responsible 
values and behaviours.

In our English Language Learning courseware, 
we have embedded our PSC Framework in 
order to equip learners of English with the 
language and functional skills to build a more 
sustainable future. For example, iDiscover,  
our new course for secondary students of 
English in Italy, developed in partnership with 
the BBC, contains content with specific focus 
on social responsibility. 

As part of our future product strategy, the 
BTEC and Apprenticeship team are currently 
reviewing all existing qualifications and adding 
or amending content to include relevant 
sustainability measures and content for each 
sector. Sustainable content will be added to all 
UK BTEC qualifications by September 2022.  
In the UK, we are working with the University 
Technical Colleges (UTCs), employers and 
Professional Engineering Institutions (PEIs) to 
develop a series of units on environmental/
sustainable engineering to support the move 
towards a more sustainable future with new 
technologies and manufacturing processes. 
Forthcoming units will focus on sustainable 
transport, energy management, renewable 
energy and environmental sustainability.  
The BTEC International team have mapped 
units in Construction, Business and Enterprise 
and Hospitality in their International Level 3 
BTEC suite to the UN SDGs, and this can  
be seen in the specifications for the  
relevant qualifications.

In Italy, for each level of school, we have 
incorporated dedicated sections on the  
SDGs that include content, resources, 
exercises and in-depth materials in both 
paper and digital format. We have also 
produced and distributed promotional 
materials on the SDGs, for both teachers and 
students, such as posters, notebooks and 
bookmarks, and we featured our Towards 
2030 campaign, which highlights sustainability 
prominently in our textbooks. In terms of 
digital products, we have Orizzonti sostenibili 
(Sustainable Horizons) through which 
students and teachers read, discuss and 
comment on pieces taken from books and 
other sources through the Pearson Social 
Reading app. 

Learning for a  
better world

Leading the transformation to  
build the skills to make an impact.

One of the biggest ways we can impact 
sustainability and the UN SDGs as a company 
is through our consumers, employees and 
suppliers. We have an opportunity to equip 
people to understand key societal and 
environmental issues and develop a sense of 
social responsibility to take action through 
their careers and in their day-to-day lives. 

Beyond having an impact, this is also an area 
of increased demand from key stakeholders 
including students, educators, governments, 
employers and employees. By integrating 
sustainability-related content into our 
products, we can explore new opportunities 
while making a direct contribution to the  
UN SDGs and inspiring the next generation  
to improve their world. 

Sustainability and social 
responsibility in content 

  We will integrate sustainability, social 

responsibility and DE&I knowledge and 
skills into our content, qualifications and 
online programmes , preparing people to 
make an impact in their jobs and lives 

Using our internal expertise on learner 
outcomes (see p26) and external input,  
we aligned our criteria for products that  
teach sustainability and social responsibility. 
This definition aligns with both the social 
responsibility strand of our Personal and 
Social Capabilities (PSC) Framework, which 
includes multicultural, civic, ethical and 
environmental elements, as well as aligning 
with external frameworks like the UN SDGs. 
Importantly, learning about sustainability 
includes environmental, social and 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information46

Sustainability

Empowering educators, employees 
and suppliers

  We will develop and disseminate tools 
and resources to help educators bring 
sustainability into their classes

  We will provide opportunity to all 

employees and suppliers to access 
content, courses and training to 
explore sustainability, social 
responsibility and DE&I issues by 2023 

We know that empowering educators, 
employees and suppliers with sustainability 
know-how will have an enormous ripple 
effect. It is an area of interest for these groups 
as more and more people want to integrate 
purpose into their careers. And for employees 
and suppliers especially, it is a key to 
equipping them to better contribute to 
achieving all of our sustainability targets.

With regard to educators in our English 
Language Learning business, 2021 will also 
see the launch of our DE&I modules for 
teachers, a key strand of our Teacher 
Education and Leadership Academy, which 
contributes to our target for supporting 
educators to teach sustainability and  
social responsibility.

For employees, we relaunched our internal 
approach to employee learning in 2020. One 
aspect of this was developing a capabilities 
framework setting out the knowledge, skills, 
mindsets and experiences needed to support 
the ongoing transformation of the company. 
The development of sustainable business 
knowledge and skills falls within our core 
business capabilities. This was brought to life 
during our first-ever global Learning at Work 
Week (see p49). Developing capabilities 
related to DE&I was a key learning pathway 
through this programme. Going forward,  
we will use this and other formats to increase 
awareness about sustainability issues among 
our employees, including through self-service 
curated pathways about sustainability in  
our digital content library, available to all 
employees, and our accelerated learning  
and career development experiences, 
available to our talent. 

For suppliers, we also commit to providing 
training material to all suppliers free of charge, 
using our unique position as the world’s 
learning company to promote good practice 
across industry.

Net carbon zero

  By 2030, we will reduce scope 1, 2 and 3 

emissions by 50% against a 2018 baseline 
as approved by the Science Based 
Targets Initiative

  We will be net zero across scope 1, 2  

and 3 by 2030

We are committed to becoming net carbon 
zero by 2030. The first step on this journey is 
to reduce emissions. Where we are unable to 
reduce emissions, we will buy suitable carbon 
capture ‘credits’ to meet our net zero target 
for our scope 1,2 and 3 emissions. 

In 2020, we completed a project to map  
our scope 3 GHG emissions and develop a 
proposal for the Science Based Targets 
Initiative (SBTi) to establish our new long-term 
goal for carbon emissions. Our target to 
reduce our GHG emissions by a minimum  
of 50% (from a 2018 baseline) across scope  
1, 2 and 3 by 2030 was approved by the SBTi in 
April 2020. This confirmed that our reduction 
target is in line with the requirements set  
out in the Paris Agreement, to limit  
global temperature rises to 1.5 °C above 
pre-industrial levels. 

Leading 
responsibly

Creating a culture and running a 
business that prioritises our impact  
on climate change and human rights.

Just as important as our commitment to 
delivering positive outcomes for our 
customers is our commitment to ensure  
we act ethically and sustainably. We strive  
to ensure we always act lawfully and with 
transparency, support human rights and our 
employees, and minimise our impact on the 
planet and the societies where we operate or 
source products and services from.

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

NON-FINANCIALMEASURE

Global Greenhouse Gas emissions data

Metric tonnes of CO2e

Scope 1 – combustion of fuels 

Scope 2 – electricity (location based) 

Scope 2 – electricity (market based) 

Scope 31

Total – location based

Total – market based

Energy use

2018

2019

2020

2020%UK

13,057

49,920

4,583

13,251

47,384

418

7,251

34,997

529

596,740

567,245

346,382

659,717

627,881

388,629

614,380

580,914

354,162

14%

9%

0%

UK (gas, electricity and transport) MWh 

19,312

18,526

17%

Global (gas, electricity and transport) MWh

152,231

107,848

Intensity ratios

tCO2e per employee (scope 1, 2 market and 3)
tCO2e/sales revenue (scope 1, 2 market and 3)

25.3

148.8

25.6

150.1

16.6

104.3

1  All relevant Scope 3 categories as defined by the GHG protocol have been assessed.

For 10 of our key markets, we buy renewable energy through green energy tariffs or renewable energy 
certificates (RECs) in the country of consumption. This accounts for 96% of our electricity use.

Methodology: We have reported on all of the emission sources required under the Companies Act 2006. 
The method we have used to calculate GHG emissions is the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and 
Reporting Standard (revised edition), using the Scope 2 dual reporting methodology, together with the 
latest emission factors from recognised public sources, including, but not limited to, the UK Department 
for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, the International Energy Agency, the US Energy Information 
Administration, the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
Change. The data in the table above has been independently verified by Corporate Citizenship. Energy use 
includes gas and electricity consumption in MWh and vehicle fuel use converted from mileage into MWh 
using BIES conversion factor.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures

In 2020, we became a signatory to the Task Force on  
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). 

47

This commitment gives us a renewed focus  
to reduce our operational (Scope 1 and 2) 
emissions. It also introduces a new challenge 
to reduce the 90% of our emissions that are 
produced in our value chain. To do this we 
need to engage and work with our suppliers to 
reduce the carbon embedded in the products 
and services we buy. Going forward, we will 
report our carbon reduction against a 2018 
baseline in line with our new target. 

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted our 
emissions, and we have seen a 40% reduction 
in overall emissions (vs our 2018 baseline). 
Given the significant shift to home working, 
we have estimated the energy consumption 
and associated carbon emissions from staff 
working at home, using our own estimations 
and calculations in 2020 as no standard 
methodology exists, and included them in  
our scope 3 emissions. We will shift to 
industry standard methodologies as and 
when these become available. 

Our target to become net zero is reflected in 
our Environment Policy, which also sets our 
commitment to reduce energy consumption 
in our buildings. In 2020 we started a 
refurbishment project for our 80 Strand head 
office, which includes a number of energy 
reduction measures and technologies.

Where are our emissions from?

tonnes (to nearest 500)1

1
E
P
O
C
S

2
E
P
O
C
S

3
E
P
O
C
S

Buildings and  
company vehicles

13,000

Purchased electricity

4,500

Manufacturing and 
distribution of  
products (books)

256,500

Other/indirect spend

212,500

Business travel

26,000

Employee  
commuting

29,000

Use/disposal

39,500

Other

33,500

1  2018 baseline.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationThe disclosure included below outlines the work we have started to align our climate risk disclosure with the TCFD recommendations. Doing so will enable our stakeholders to understand the ways in which climate change is affecting our business now, and in the future. It is expected that these disclosures will continue to evolve as the company moves towards full alignment this year, which we will report on in the 2021 annual  report. As our response to the  TCFD guidelines evolves, we will  be reviewing our internal governance structures and ensure climate change risks are included  in our strategic group risk mechanisms, ensuring they are appropriately managed and opportunities are seized.In June 2017, the TCFD published recommendations to encourage businesses to increase disclosure  of climate-related information. These recommendations focus on: governance; risk management; strategy; and metrics and targets.   Governance: The Board Reputation & Responsibility Committee (see p53) has oversight of sustainability, and as we build climate change risks into our wider strategic risk work, the Audit Committee is likely to take an increased role in managing these risks. During 2021 we plan to  build responsibility for climate change risks into the remit of the Responsible Business Leadership Council (see p88 )  Risk management: In October 2020, we started work to identify climate change risks to the business. We are currently prioritising the most material  risks and opportunities. We will report on these risks in the 2021 annual report  Strategy: During 2021 we are building a strategy to manage potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities  Metrics and targets: As part of  the overall implementation of our Sustainable Business Plan 2030,  we have set a net zero carbon target, which covers our scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (details on these emissions can be found on p46). Going forward we will define and build out reporting targets and metrics relating to climate change risk mitigation and opportunities Our progress against these recommendations  is outlined below:  
 
 
People of Pearson

We launched an employee engagement community for 
employees to connect, share stories and support one 
another. You can meet some of our talented colleagues 
throughout this report in the People of Pearson callouts. 

48

Sustainability

Environmental footprint  
of products
Pearson has a responsibility to ensure that 
our products are made from sustainable 
resources, have a minimal environmental 
impact during the use phase and can be 
disposed of in a way that minimises their 
end-of-life impacts. We are making three 
commitments in relation to our products:

As part of our responsible sourcing 
programme (see p52), 100% of paper 
products will be Forest Stewardship Council 
(FSC) certified by 2025.

We will ensure all products and packaging are 
widely recycled or covered by a take-back 
programme . We will use materials that are 
recyclable, allowing consumers to use existing 
recycling systems where they exist. Where  
we need to use specific materials that are not 
widely collected for recycling, we will build 
take-back systems.

We will design digital products to be energy 
efficient. To better understand how our  
digital products use energy in data centres, 
transition to the consumer (over internet  
or mobile telecoms networks) and in 
consumer devices, we have joined an industry 
collaboration called DIMPACTS. The work we 
are undertaking with this group will help us to 
measure the baseline energy consumption of 
digital products and services in order to set 
targets to minimise the impacts.

Human rights

  We respect the rights of consumers, 

employees, suppliers and communities, 
and we consider the human rights 
impact of our business decisions

  We are committed to ensuring that 

Pearson maintains safeguards of our 
customer data while also working with 
our customers to develop products 
tailored to their needs

Our goal is to respect and promote human 
rights, including the right to education, 
throughout our operations and with our 
customers, employees, contractors and 
supply chain. Our approach is guided by the 
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,  
the International Labour Organization’s 
declarations on fundamental principles and 
rights at work, the UN Guiding Principles on 
Business and Human Rights, and the UN 
Global Compact Principles. We are a founding 
signatory to the UN Global Compact, and we 
are a member of the Global Compact’s UK  
and USA Local Networks. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationLearning expands the mind and creates new opportunities for discussion and growth.Danette Joslyn-Gaul  Vice President, Global Compliance Georgia, USALearning empowers me to be more than a passerby, and to make an impact.Zerin Anzum Karim  Technology Business Partner, Continental Europe London, UKI truly believe in education as a tool for changing and impacting the world.Lauro Tozetto Neto Editor & Spectrum Brazil Chair  São Paulo, BrazilI firmly believe that learning can have a transformative effect, not just on an  individual but dozens of family members  and future generations.Haseeb Khan Director of Digital Platforms, English Assessment Toronto, Canada49

We respect the rights of our employees to 
freedom of association and representation 
through trade unions, works councils or any 
other appropriate forum wherever local laws 
allow. We have policies and procedures to 
prevent discriminatory, illegal and inhumane 
labour practices including child labour, forced 
labour, slavery and human trafficking, in our 
places of business, as well as to address 
violations when they occur. 

Representation takes many forms.  
We support the right to unionise in the UK. 
Pearson maintains its accreditation by the 
Living Wage Foundation and has committed 
to paying employees and regularly contracted 
staff working in our buildings across the UK 
and in London the real Living Wage.

We use our influence with our suppliers to 
improve standards for their employees and 
commit to ensuring all supplier employees 
who work for, or on behalf of, Pearson have 
the ability to report any areas of concern. 
Read more about supporting our suppliers 
and our work to prevent modern slavery in 
the supply chain on p51 

Our Human Rights Statement outlines the 
priority human rights risks and opportunities 
for Pearson that our programme is taking 
steps to address. Our approach to human 
rights covers five areas: customers (pp43–45, 
p61), content (p44), employees (below), 
partnerships (p51) and privacy and data  
(see risk section, p62 

) 

Employees

  Provide opportunities for employees  
to use their talent to contribute to 
sustainability objectives through both 
their business roles and volunteering 

Our employees are central to our purpose of 
helping people make progress in their lives 
through learning. As such, we play a crucial 
role in creating a working environment that 
enables our employees to learn, grow and 
succeed. This strategic report describes the 
numerous ways in which the company 
engages with, invests in and rewards its 
employees. The remuneration report also 
describes the remuneration philosophy  
which applies to the entire company.

In 2020, we focused on supporting our 
employees through the pandemic, increasing 
employee engagement, integrating talent and 
learning, and expanding benefits. We also 
expanded our DE&I efforts, outlined on p50. 

Our intention is to expand this to Directors 
and Managers in 2021. In addition, in our 
latest pulse survey, 71% of employees who 
responded shared that they completed 
quarterly check-ins on performance and 
learning in the past quarter, and 57% reported 
doing something to upskill or reskill.

To support employees to upskill and reskill, in 
the first quarter, we piloted a new early career 
leadership programme, ILEAD, in International 
and a new manager programme, Imanage, in 
the UK. The Wave programme, an initiative to 
enable experiential, on-the-job learning and 
employee mobility, was expanded to cover 
more parts of the business and we made 
available to employees a further five Pearson 
Products to support to support upskilling and 
reskilling – MePro English  G , Pearson Prep  G , 
Pearson Writer  G , Accelerated Pathways  G , 
Pearson Advance  G  – and beta tested 
Pearson Career Courses: project Oz, and 
ITPro. In the third quarter, we launched  
our first-ever Global Learning at Work Week, 
delivering 60 fully online learning sessions 
delivered by internal and external subject 
matter experts and Pearson authors, 
engaging 50% of our employees.

Employee benefits

We offer competitive benefit programmes to 
support our employees. Our programmes 
vary globally and include health insurance, 
disability coverage, retirement savings 
matching, employee share purchase options, 
commuter benefits, tuition reimbursement, 
and programmes that support wellbeing and 
work–life balance.

In 2020, we expanded US paid parental leave 
to 16 weeks. All parents, no matter how they 
become parents, are now eligible for equal 
parental leave benefits. 

Our pandemic response focused on 
supporting wellbeing, including flexible  
work from home policies and extending  
work from home after the pandemic if 
business needs permit. We announced  
The Pearson Global WELL programme to 
provide support, advice and guidance for 
managing mental and physical wellbeing.  
We extended the global footprint of our 
Employee Assistance Programme, expanded 
our UK network of Mental Health First Aiders, 
and recruited employee volunteers to act as 
wellbeing champions.

Employee pulse survey

Survey question

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average

Ranking of current 
COVID-19 response 
on scale of 1–10

NPS (recommend 
working at Pearson 
to a friend or 
colleague)

Have taken steps to 
upskill or reskill in 
the past quarter

9.0 8.3 8.5 8.7

8.6

+16 +17 +16 +19

+17

N/A* 71% 60% 57%

63%

*  This question was not asked in the Q1 2020 survey.

Employee engagement

Early in 2020, we acted quickly to support our 
employees around the world and to help 
them feel safe and connected, as a majority  
of them began working from home full time. 
Read more on p13 and pp27–28 

Responding to employee feedback helps 
shape our employee experience, and our  
new quarterly pulse survey gave us key 
insights into how our employees were feeling. 
To support our employees, we launched a 
new virtual employee community, People of 
Pearson, where employees can learn about 
our products and services, share stories and 
connect with one another. 

We established a more frequent cadence  
of executive communications during the 
pandemic, with the new Chief Executive 
holding seven regional town halls in the fourth 
quarter and sending monthly video updates. 

In response to the UK Corporate Governance 
Code, we are excited to take part in 
strengthening the voice of our workforce  
with our Employee Engagement Network 
(read more on p81 
)

Aligning talent and learning

In order to deliver on our goal to make the 
most out of Pearson’s world of talent, in 2020, 
we focused on aligning our approach to talent 
and learning to the company strategy. This is 
so that we deliver greater employee and 
business value. We started by evolving and 
simplifying our approach to the talent review 
and designing and integrating a capabilities 
framework to support upskilling and reskilling 
led learning. 

This spans the core business, leadership and 
technical knowledge, skills, mindsets and 
experiences needed to support the ongoing 
digital transformation of the company.  
We piloted this with the Pearson Executive 
Management team and our Pearson 
Leadership Group, which comprises all Senior 
Vice Presidents, as well as Vice Presidents that 
report to the Executive Management team. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
50

Sustainability

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

 Wearecommittedtorepresentationat

management levels of the company that 
reflectstheracial,ethnicandgender
diversityofthegeographieswherewe
operate by 2025

DE&I has been at the forefront of employees’ 
minds,associaljusticebecameakeytheme 
oftheyearacrosstheUSandglobally.Atask
force of employees across all levels of the 
companycametogethertoidentifyconcrete,
actionablewaystoimproverecruitment,
retentionandinclusion,andtoensureour
productsandserviceshelpbuildamore
inclusivesociety.

Asaresultofthetaskforce’swork,Pearson
madeacommitmenttobeananti-racist
companyineverythingwedo.Weadopteda
setofstretchinggoalsaroundrepresentation,
companyculture,productandourrolein
society.Anactionplancomprisinggoals,

pillarsforactionand50initiativesfor
implementation over the next 12 to 18 months 
underpinsourcommitment.Thisincludes
investmentinanewrecruitmentplatform,
enhancedleadershipdevelopment
opportunitiestargetedatBlackandethnically
diversetalent,andnewguidelinesonraceand
ethnicitytoguideoureditorialteams.Weare
alsoexpandingourGlobalDE&Iteamunder
theleadershipofanewChiefDiversityOfficer,
Dr.FloridaE.Starks,deepeningandwidening
ourinvestmentacrossthebusinessbyadding
newpeople,toolsandtechnology.

Acommitmenttoinclusionandanti-racismis
notaltruism.Adiverseworkforcethatreflects
ourcustomers–whetherthatbeinrace,
ethnicity,gender,genderidentity,religion,
disability,sexualorientation,education,
learningstyle,nationaloriginorpersonality
type–meanswecanbetterrepresentand
understandthediversityofthecommunities
weserve.Wesetoutthecharacteristicsinour
DE&IStatement.

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR NON-FINANCIAL MEASURE

WomenandraceandethnicityinPearson
AmongoursevenDE&Iprioritiesisagoaltoimprovegenderrepresentationatthetoptwo
levelsofthecompany.AtBoardlevel,45%ofourmemberswerefemaleasattheendof2020.

Asafoundingmemberofthe30%Club,wehaveendorsedandexceededthetargetofa
minimumof33%representationofwomenontheBoardandinourPearsonLeadership
Groupby2020.Thetablebelowsetsoutourfemalerepresentationoverthepastthree
years.Thecolumnsontherightrepresentmalerepresentation.ReadmoreaboutBoard
diversityanddiversityandtalentinexecutivepipelineonpp86–87.

Female representation

BoardofDirectors

Seniorleadership1

Allemployees2

Male 
representation

2018

2019

2020

2020

2020

2020

30%

31%

62%

33%

34%

59%

45%

36%

5

35

55%

64%

6

61

60% 13,031

40% 8,810

Whilethefocusofthegenderrepresentationmeasureisonfemales,wedorecognisethat
wealsohavenon-binarycolleaguesinthecompany.Aspartofawiderfocusongender
identityin2020,Pearsonintroducedanoptiontoself-identifyasnon-binaryinourHR
systemsintheUnitedStates.Transparencyisakeypartofouractionplantomeetour
goalby2025toberepresentativeatmanagementlevelsoftheracialandethnicdiversity
ofthegeographieswhereweoperate.Thetablebelowsetsoutdiverserepresentation,
definedasidentifyingasnon-WhiteintheUSandUK,andthesupplementtothisannual
reportbreaksdownbyethnicity.

Diverse representation

Seniorleadership1

Managersandabove

Allemployees2

US 
2020

UK 
2020

18%

19%

30%

10%

15%

17%

1 Typically,uptotworeportinglinesfromtheChiefExecutive,theseniorleadershiparetheemployee

bodywithresponsibilityforplanninganddirectingtheactivitiesofthecompany.

2 Totalemployeefiguresforcompositionofworkforcearebasedonasnapshotofemployeesasat 

31December2020.Averageannualfiguresfor2020areusedelsewhereinthisreportanddifferdue 
toincludingseasonalemployeesatpeakperiodsinourassessmentbusinesses,aswellasthosewho
maynolongerbeemployedbytheGroupat31December2020.

Learn more online:

DE&I statement

Webelieveeveryoneinthecompanyplaysa
partinbuildingamoreinclusiveculture.Our
strategicframeworkforDE&Ihelpsusharness
differentperspectivesandleveragediversity
tospurinnovationandgrowththroughan
inclusivecultureandaworkingenvironment
inwhicheveryonefeelsasenseofbelonging.
Ourapproachincludes:

 aGlobalDE&ICouncilledbytheChief
Executivetoprovidestrategicoversightand
toextendourworkintomanymoremarkets
andcountries.TheCouncilincludesbusiness
leaders,alliesandadvocates,aswellas
representativesfromouremployee
resourcegroups

 asetofsevenpriorities,whichguideour
actionplanningandmajorinitiatives.Our
actionplanonraceandethnicityadds 
depthtoourefforts

 aglobalnetworkofDE&IAdvocateswho
providesupporttoadvanceourpracticein
theirbusinessesandgeographiclocations 

 aplantohelpour10employeeresource
groupsatPearsonevolveandmature. 
Thenetworksareforwomen,womenin
technology,parents,veterans,employees
identifyingasHispanicorLatinx,theLGBT+
community,generationaldifferences,
peoplewithdisabilities,employeesof 
Blackand/orAfricanancestry,andagroup
representingBlack,Asianandminority
ethnic people

Disabilityisanimportantpartofourwider
commitmenttoDE&I(seeabove).Weworkto
ensurethatappropriateprocedures,training
andsupportareinplaceforpeoplewith
disabilitiestoensurefairaccesstocareer 
andprogressionopportunities.OurPearson
ABLEemployeeresourcegrouphelpsimprove
practicebybringingtogetherpeoplewith
disabilitiesinPearsonandaccessibility
advocates.PearsonisasignatorytoValuable
500,anetworkofcompaniescommittedto
disabilityinclusionthroughbusiness
leadershipandopportunity.

In2020,PearsonreceivedanumberofDE&I
awards(seep55).Pearsonscored90%inthe
DisabilityEqualityIndexasa2020BestPlace
toWorkforDisabilityInclusionintheUS 
andachievedaperfectscoreof100%in 
theCorporateEqualityIndexrunbyLGBT
advocacygrouptheHumanRightsCampaign.
Wealsocontinuedtoberecognisedas
fosteringaninclusiveculturethroughour
leaders,andCindyRampersaud,ourSenior
VicePresident-BTECandApprenticeshipshas,

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information51

for a second year, been recognised in the 2020 
EMpower list of the top 100 ethnic minority 
business leaders. Cindy also received an 
award from WeQual which recognises 
talented women one level below the executive 
management across the FTSE. 

Pearson continues to report on Great Britain 
gender pay in line with UK regulations. Our 
work to extend our reporting on gender pay 
to cover our global operations continues and 
is on track to report on 2020 later in 2021. 

Learn more online:

Gender pay report

Socially responsible procurement
  We will work exclusively with suppliers 

who respect human rights and promote 
suppliers who champion DE&I

  We will source £500m from suppliers 
who are diverse accredited by 2030

At Pearson, we believe in doing business  
with partners who share our commitment  
to human rights and the environment – 
strengthening our supply chain through 
shared values and commitments.

In 2020, Pearson purchased c.£2bn of goods 
and services from third parties, from large 
multinationals to smaller specialist companies 
and sole traders. Around 80% of Pearson’s 
global spend is represented by 470 suppliers.

The majority of products and services 
Pearson purchases are sourced from 
suppliers in OECD countries, predominantly  
in North America and Europe. Our 
relationships with suppliers are guided by  
our commitments to international standards 
for human rights and environmental 
responsibility. We are committed to the  
UN Global Compact and other human rights 
standards including the Universal Declaration 
of Human Rights, the International Labour 
Organization’s declarations on fundamental 
principles and rights at work, and the UN 
Guiding Principles on Business and Human 
Rights. The UK Modern Slavery Act also guides 
our approach.

Learn more online:

Modern Slavery statement

We are a founding member of the Book Chain 
Project, a partnership between publishers to 
enhance industry standards relating to labour 
standards and human rights, product safety, 
and paper sourcing. 

PTNA

LINK TO STRATEGY

Awarding commitment

People of Pearson

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationKirsty teaches at Goodwin Academy  in Kent, England. Having joined as a learning support assistant to help vulnerable pupils, she was quickly identified as having a talent for teaching mathematics. She continued to work at the school while studying during the evenings and weekends for her diploma in education. Kirsty was delighted to receive her award: “I feel honoured to have won such a prestigious award for simply doing what I love. Teaching, for me,  is a vocation, a passion, a sense  of belonging.”Since qualifying as a teacher, Kirsty has continued to put in immense amounts of work to ensure her students succeed. She regularly organises lunchtime revision sessions, afterschool interventions, and constantly communicates with parents, all to make sure her students have the best possible chance when it comes  to their exams.Kirsty added: “Winning this award means so much, not only to me, but to the staff, the students, the parents  and carers and the community. Collaboratively, we have worked unbelievably hard to ensure the young people of Deal receive the best education possible.”About the Pearson National Teaching AwardsThe Pearson National Teaching Awards are the UK’s flagship awards programme for the education community. The awards identify and celebrate leading teachers and organisations from across the UK. Following a national call for nominations, an in-depth selection process with an experienced judging panel is conducted, including visits  to all shortlisted schools. Successful nominees are awarded with a Silver winner status, and ultimately Gold for the national winner. Gold winners are announced at a national ceremony, broadcast on the BBC and attended by hundreds of guests, including senior politicians  and education leaders. Learn more online:The Pearson National  Teaching AwardsKirsty Gaythwaite is one of 14 Pearson National Teaching Award Gold Award winners in 2020. Nominated under the ‘Outstanding New Teacher of the Year’ category, she was selected from thousands of nominations. I’m always learning because the culture  is always changing.James McKnight  Associate Director, Student Support ServicesFlorida, USA52

Sustainability

People of Pearson

In 2021, we will be further building on these 
commitments to establish our Socially 
Responsible Procurement (SRP) framework. 
The purpose of this framework is to build a 
shared set of principles with our supplier 
partners, to focus on how we can improve 
global industry standards through education, 
and ensure joint accountability built on 
mutual trust. The framework will comprise 
four pillars and is underpinned by our 
Responsible Procurement policy.

Learn more online:

Responsible Procurement policy

The four pillars within the framework are:

  Carbon reduction 

  Diversity, Equity & Inclusion 

  Ethical production 

  Modern slavery 

Pearson takes reports of ethical concerns 
within our supply chain seriously. Such issues 
can be reported through our Pearson Ethics 
and Compliance Portal – a dedicated service 
for all employees, suppliers and business 
partners to report any unethical behaviour  
for investigation.

It is the duty of our suppliers, contractors, 
business partners and employees to  
report any breach of our Code of Conduct, 
including dishonesty, corruption, fraud, 
labour and human rights concerns, 
environmental damage or any other  
unethical behaviour through the Pearson 
Ethics and Compliance Portal. 

Sourcing policies 

Our policies help ensure Pearson’s values are 
reflected and shared with everyone we do 
business with. The Business Partner Code  
of Conduct (Partner Code) clarifies the 
responsibilities and expectations we have of 
our business partners (which includes joint 
venture partners, vendors, franchisees, 
distributors, suppliers, contractors, 
consultants and agents) for ethical and 
responsible business practices. 

The Partner Code sets out our support for 
environmental stewardship, universal human 
rights (including equal employment, freedom 
of speech and of association, and cultural, 
economic and social wellbeing), good labour 
practices, and decent working conditions. It 
also sets out expectations that our supply 
partners, and their subcontractors, oppose 
discriminatory, illegal or inhumane labour 
practices, including slavery and human 
trafficking. The Partner Code is present in  
new contracts and is included when contracts 
are renewed or updated. Compliance with  
the principles in our Code is a minimum 
standard of behaviour outlined in contracts 
and Pearson is committed to working 
exclusively with suppliers that share and 
enhance our values.

Our Business Terms of Reference, specific to 
Pearson’s supply chain contracts, set out  
the terms and conditions for purchase of 
goods and services, and are agreed prior  
to engaging suppliers. This provides  
Pearson with the power of audit and right  
to terminate a relationship if we find issues  
of non-compliance, ensuring our responsible 
purchasing principles are contractually 
enforceable. 

When working with schools and campuses, 
suppliers must have an acceptable 
safeguarding policy which meets or exceeds 
Pearson’s own. Suppliers are also subject to 
Pearson’s Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy 
(see p62) and Gifts and Hospitality Policy. 

Learn more online:

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

Gifts and Hospitality Policy

In 2021 we will be conducting a full review of 
our sourcing policies in conjunction with the 
Socially Responsible Procurement framework 
to introduce greater weighting for suppliers 
who contribute to our goals. Suppliers will  
be asked to disclose more information on 
their own internal policies, procedures and 
commitments on all aspects of the framework 
during the bid process to ensure we select the 
right partners.

We have committed to providing education 
content and resources to all suppliers by 2023. 
As part of the SRP framework, we will be 
offering targeted resources and support to 
those supplier partners who need it the most.

Direct supply chain
While we have a growing technology-enabled 
supply chain reflecting our increasing shift to 
digital, our traditional paper-based products 
continue to receive significant focus – 
reflecting our commitments to sustainability 
and resilience. Our Global Operations teams 
manage our purchase of paper for books,  
our contracts with printers and work with 
distributors and freight partners who bring 
our products to market. 

Paper sourcing 

Pearson has a long-standing Responsible 
Paper Sourcing Policy supporting 
management of risks related to human rights 
and environmental practices in our direct 
supply chain. This policy sets out our 
preference for paper suppliers that hold 
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification. 
In addition, our Sustainable Business Plan 
2030 sets a target for 100% FSC by 2025  
(see also p48 

) 

In 2020, we purchased over 35,000 tonnes  
of paper globally. To help to reduce our 
impact, we have retained Chain of Custody 
accreditation from the FSC in the UK, which 
enables Pearson products to carry the FSC 
logo. Of the more than 8,000 tonnes of paper 
we purchased in the UK, 61% was certified to 
the FSC standard. The overall tonnage is down 
from 2019 as we have continued our transition 
from print to digital, sold the Savvas business 
and experienced short-term impacts during 
COVID-19. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationLearning is a tool that helps individuals  overcome barriers, seek justice and  reach their full potential.Saleem Abu-Tayeh  Pearson Campus Ambassador, Student Programmes Florida, USALearning can be the only powerful tool  which can help us navigate the ways in life.Gracie Zhao Portfolio Director,  English Henan Province, China 53

In the US Higher Education Courseware 
business, paper procurement, print 
manufacturing, warehousing and distribution 
operations are outsourced to LSC 
Communications, which is subject to  
our Business Partner Code of Conduct.  
In 2020 LSC purchased more than 8,000 
tonnes of paper in support of Pearson’s 
manufacturing needs, 25% being certified to 
the FSC standard. Globally 32% of the paper 
used is certified FSC.

Print production 

We rely on third-party suppliers to print our 
textbooks and course materials. Globally,  
we have a diverse and resilient supply  
base of over 160 print partners covering 
approximately £118m in spend. This decrease 
in spend from 2019 also reflects our digital 
transition, sale of Savvas and short-term 
impacts during COVID-19. 

Where Pearson spend with a new supplier will 
be greater than £100,000 per annum, and the 
supplier is identified as operating within a 
higher-risk country (using the Book Chain 
standard), Pearson will require the supplier  
to evidence a valid audit from an acceptable 
independent third-party body. The Book 
Chain standard is utilised to help publishers 
identify labour and environmental risks in the 
supplier chain.

Acceptable third-party audits under the Book 
Chain standard include, but are not limited to, 
Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA); 
ICTI Care process (now the Code of Conduct 
Audit), and the Social Accountability 8000 
certification (SA8000).

Our due diligence process also includes 
visiting suppliers around the world to assess 
compliance with our standards, and to  
ensure suppliers address non-compliance. 
These visits provide a valuable opportunity  
to reinforce our commitments to eliminating 
all forms of child, forced and compulsory 
labour, as well as promoting environmental 
stewardship. 

In the UK business we had £18m in spend  
with 34 suppliers in total. Of these, we have 
identified four suppliers, representing £3m  
in spend, as high risk based on country of 
operation (China and Malaysia), guidance 
from the Book Chain Project and meeting  
our £100,000 materiality threshold. While 
none were visited in 2020 due to the impacts 
of COVID-19, independent audits were 
conducted for two of the four vendors in  
2020, and all four were visited in 2019 to 
ensure compliance with agreed standards.

Indirect procurement 
Following deployment of systems in the UK, 
US and Canada, new supplier requests are 
tracked and subject to an auditable risk 
assessment. Suppliers submit onboarding 
information directly and securely through our 
platform, where risk is assessed, as relevant, 
against: conflict of interest, trade sanctions, 
sanctioned countries, data privacy, system 
security, safeguarding, compliance, 
sustainability, physical security, diversity,  
and business continuity. During 2020, we 
deployed systems to Japan, Singapore, 
Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines 
deploying equivalent processes.

Contingent workers 

Allegis Global Solutions (AGS) is the major 
partner supporting Pearson’s relationships 
with our contingent workforce population. 
Our contingent workers frequently fill roles 
such as engineers, developers, exam graders 
and project managers. 

AGS, and our other partners, help Pearson 
ensure our contingent workers receive 
detailed information outlining how Pearson’s 
people policies apply to them, and help to 
hold contingent worker agencies accountable 
for ensuring that workers are informed of 
these policies. 

Supplier diversity 

As part of Pearson’s commitment to being  
an anti-racist and anti-discriminatory 
organisation, we have an established supplier 
diversity programme focusing on local, small, 
diverse businesses – such as underutilised,  
or women, minority, LGBT or veteran-owned 
businesses. As part of our SRP framework,  
we are continuously looking for ways we can 
expand the reach of this programme to our 
larger suppliers who do not fit the traditional 
accreditation criteria – but equally have a 
material part to play in driving change. 2021 
will see greater focus on our sourcing policies 
to ensure we work with suppliers who share 
and enhance our values and raising industry 
standards through education and resource.

Supplier risk

Our 2021 supplier risk programme includes 
the launch of a revised supplier risk 
framework with focus on: social, ethical and 
environmental; compliance; operational; 
financial and business continuity concerns.  
In parallel with clear supplier segmentation, 
Pearson is now better placed to execute a 
sustainable assessment of suppliers and will 
concentrate on improving the efficiency, 
effectiveness and breadth of risk assessment 
through the continued investment in 
technology and partnerships.

Governance

Sustainability governance
The Reputation & Responsibility Committee,  
a formal committee of the Board, provides 
ongoing oversight, scrutiny and challenge  
on matters relating to our sustainability 
strategy and our corporate reputation.  
Learn more on p88 

The Pearson Executive Management team 
oversees implementation of business and 
sustainability strategy. The Responsible 
Business Leadership Council drives 
implementation of the strategy on behalf of 
the Board. It comprises leaders from across 
the business. In 2021, we will review the 
Group’s composition in light of our business 
strategy and build in climate risk oversight in 
connection with TCFD (see p47 

)

Code of Conduct 
The Pearson Code of Conduct underpins our 
values by setting out the global ethical, social 
and environmental standards of behaviour 
we expect from employees, and we have a 
companion code for business partners. 

Our Code of Conduct was revised and 
refreshed in 2020, and the course included a 
focus on raising concerns, a certification to the 
Code and an overview of our Global Conflicts 
of Interest Policy and disclosure process.  
In addition, in 2020 we sought input from  
our DE&I task force and included language  
to reaffirm our commitment to being  
an anti-racist organisation through a  
number of different amendments to our  
Code of Conduct. 

We make sure all Pearson employees are 
aware of our Code and affirm that they 
understand and will comply with it. In 2020, 
we achieved our target of 100% employee 
completion and acknowledgement of the 
Code by all employees. The Code is also 
assigned as part of the onboarding process 
for all new Pearson employees. 

Raising concerns
We operate a free, confidential telephone 
helpline and website for anyone who wants to 
raise a concern, and we have a clear Raising 
Concerns and Anti-Retaliation Policy in place 
to encourage honesty and openness. Cases 
that pose significant risks to our business are 
reported to the Pearson Audit Committee 
with ultimate ownership by the Board.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
54

Sustainability

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Index

For the first time, we are providing an index of the metrics we 
are reporting in response to the SASB standards. Because of the 
nature of our business, we are reporting metrics from the Media 
& Entertainment, Internet & Media Services, and Education 

standards. In some cases, we have omitted metrics, and we will 
undertake work in 2021 and plan to report additional metrics in 
our next annual report.

Sustainability disclosure topic

Accounting metric

Code

Response

Media & Entertainment Industry Standards 

Media Pluralism 

Percentage of gender and racial/ethnic group representation for  
(1) management, (2) professionals, and (3) all other employees 

Description of policies and procedures to ensuring pluralism in  
news media content

Journalistic Integrity & 
Sponsorship Identification 

Description of approach for ensuring journalistic integrity of  
news programming related to: (1) truthfulness, accuracy,  
objectivity, fairness, and accountability, (2) independence of  
content and/or transparency of potential bias, and (3) protection  
of privacy and limitation of harm

V-ME-260a.1 

See table on p5 and p50

SV-ME-260a.2 While our content is for learning 

rather than news media, our 
approach to pluralism is reflected  
in our work on representation in 
content on p44

SV-ME-270a.3 We have an Editorial Policy that 
applies these standards to our 
educational content. See p44

Intellectual Property Protection  
& Media Piracy 

Description of approach to ensuring intellectual property  
(IP) protection 

SV-ME-520a.1  See p62 in the principal risks section

Internet Media & Services Industry Standards 

Environmental Footprint of 
Hardware Infrastructure 

(1) Total energy consumed, (2) percentage grid electricity,  
(3) percentage renewable

(1) Total water withdrawn, (2) total water consumed, percentage of 
each in regions with high or extremely high baseline water stress

TC-IM-130a.1

See our Sustainability & ESG 
supplement: plc.pearson.com/en-GB/
purpose/esg-reporting

TC-IM-130a.2 See our Sustainability & ESG 

supplement for (2): plc.pearson.com/
en-GB/purpose/esg-reporting

Data Privacy, Advertising 
Standards & Freedom  
of Expression 

Data Security 

Employee Recruitment,  
Inclusion & Performance 

Education Industry Standards

Data Security

Description of policies and practices relating to behavioural  
advertising and user privacy

TC-IM-220a.1 See p62 for in the principal risks 

section for a description of privacy

Description of approach to identifying and addressing data security 
risks, including use of third-party cybersecurity standards

Employee engagement as a percentage

Percentage of gender and racial/ethnic group representation for  
(1) management, (2) technical staff, and (3) all other employees

TC-IM-230a.2 See p62 in the principal risks section

TC-IM-330a.2 See KPIs on p5 and p49

TC-IM-330a.3 See KPIs on p5 and p50

Description of approach to identifying and addressing data  
security risks

Description of policies and practices relating to collection,  
usage, and retention of student information

SV-ED-230a.1 See p62 in the principal risks section

SV-ED-230a.2 See p61 in the principal risks section

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information55

Non-financial information statement and more information

The following table outlines where the key contents requirements  
of the non-financial information statement (as required by sections 
414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006) can be found in  
this document. 

Visit our website at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/purpose/esg-reporting  
for a complete set of our environmental, social and governance 
performance data and information about how we are aligning with the 
SASB (also see prior page), TCFD (see p47), Global Reporting Initiative 
(GRI), Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), UN Global Compact and UN 
Sustainable Development Goals.

Reporting requirement

Environmental matters

Pearson policies and procedures

Section of annual report

Environmental Policy

Paper Policy

Net carbon zero, pp46–47

Environmental footprint of products, p48

Socially responsible sourcing, pp51–53

Employees

Code of Conduct

Our employees, pp49–50

Human rights

Social matters

Human Rights Statement

Diversity, equity & inclusion, p50

Raising Concerns and Anti-Retaliation Policy

Code of Conduct, p53

Health & Safety Policy

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Statement

Human Rights Statement

Editorial Policy

Human rights, pp48–49

Editorial Policy, p45

Modern Slavery Statement

Our employees, pp49–50

Safeguarding Principles

Human Rights Statement

Anti-corruption and bribery

Code of Conduct

Anti-Bribery and Corruption (ABC) Policy

Raising Concerns and Anti-Retaliation Policy

Gifts and Hospitality Policy

Policy embedding, due diligence and outcomes

Description of principal risks and impact of  
business activity

Description of business model

Non-financialkeyperformanceindicators

Publicly available policies in the list above can be found at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/corporate-policies

Recognition and multi-stakeholder engagement

Awards, ratings and rankings

Initiatives

Our Sustainable Business Plan 2030, pp41–42

Learning for everyone, p43

Learning for a better world, p45

Legal and compliance, pp62–63

Organisational risk management, pp56–64

Sustainability, pp40–55

Organisational risk management, pp56–64

Our business model, pp16–17

Sustainability, pp40–55

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information56

Organisational risk management

Overview
Our risk management process encompasses 
the identification, analysis and response to 
various forms of risk, the establishment of risk 
thresholds, and the creation of processes 
intended to mitigate, monitor and manage 
risks within these thresholds. Across our 
organisation, we consider risk management 
an integral part of managing our core 
businesses and a key element of our  
approach to corporate governance. The focus 
is on proactively rather than reactively 
controlling risk. 

We have an integrated process for managing 
risks throughout our organisation. Our  
Board of Directors has responsibility for  
the oversight of risk management, but the 
required policies, procedures and culture are 
evidenced by each business unit. A dedicated 
Organisational Risk and Resilience (ORR) team 
supervises the risk management activities 
within each of our business units, providing 
senior management with a consolidated view 
of the key risk areas and appropriate 
responses within the framework provided  
by the ORR. 

ORGANISATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

A proactive, pragmatic and  
proven approach

Risk identification

Risk analysis

Risk mitigation

Monitoring

Understanding current and emerging risks  
is integral to Pearson’s decision-making 
process. The ORR team supports our 
businesses by embedding risk management 
into key processes, supporting the 
identification, assessment and mitigation  
of risks taken by the company. 

Pearson employs a “Three Lines of Defense” 
model, with the first line being owned  
by business leaders, who assume full 
accountability for the risks in their units.  
The second line is with the ORR, who review, 
challenge and report against the risks. The 
third line is with our Internal Audit (IA) team, 
who provide independent assurance for the 
Pearson Board. 

Risk governance structure  
and approach 
Our risk governance structure fosters the 
development and maintenance of a risk  
and controls culture, encompassing all the 
significant risk categories impacting our lines 
of business and functions. The Board of 
Directors oversees the management of risks 
through both the Reputation & Responsibility 
Committee and Audit Committee. Our risk 
approach aligns to international standards 
(e.g., COSO and ISO 31000) and aids our 
continued compliance with the Financial 
Reporting Council’s (FRC) UK Corporate 
Governance Code guidance on risk 
management, also enabling us to adapt to  
any required changes in approach. 

In line with evolving good practice,  
we continue to look at simplifying and 
clarifying the risks we report. During 2020,  
the Board of Directors undertook a robust 
assessment of the current risks facing 
Pearson, in accordance with provision 28 of 
the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code. 

Pearson identified 14 principal risks that  
we rolled forward coming into 2020 and 
continued to monitor. We expanded this  
in 2020 in the light of the increased risk 
presented by COVID-19, making 15 in total. 
COVID-19 is presented as an exceptional item 
and the impact it has had on our business is 
considered across all other risks in the 
principal risks and uncertainties status table 
on pp60–63. Pandemic risk remains under 
constant monitoring with mitigation 
measures in place. As part of our wider risk 
efforts, we also consider a range of ‘tail’ or 
high-impact, low-probability events that can 
include: socioeconomic; global recessions/
depressions; weather; natural disasters; and 
long-term global environmental issues. 

In addition to the principal risks outlined 
above, there is an additional set of operational 
risks which are monitored and reviewed 
internally throughout the year. The most 
material are classified as our principal risks 
and are those which have a higher probability 
and greater impact on strategy, reputation, 
operations or a potential fiscal impact.

In 2020, given the exceptional nature of 
COVID-19, pandemic risk was added and 
remains under constant monitoring with 
mitigation measures in place. As part of  
our wider risk efforts, we also consider a 
range of ‘tail’ or high-impact, low-probability 
events that can include: socioeconomic;  
global recessions/depressions; weather; 
natural disasters; and long-term global 
environmental issues. 

Mitigation and controls 
Throughout all 15 principal risks, Pearson 
adopts mitigation activities in the form of 
internal controls, as part of regular internal 
meetings and external consultations. These 
include reviews by the Board, reporting to 
Pearson’s Executive Management team, and 
monitoring compliance with Pearson policies, 
international regulations and standards.  
In addition, there are steering committees 
and working groups for that meet during the 
year to ensure compliance and adequate 
mitigation for a range of risk topics. 

The following principal risks also relate to  
the material issues considered in the 
sustainability section of this report on p40: 
Products and services, testing failure, political 
and regulatory, information security and data 
privacy, customer experience, and safety and 
security. The sustainability section also 
outlines work to strengthen ESG-related risk 
management through the Task Force on 
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) 
and Sustainability Accounting Standards 
Board (SASB), which we are reporting on  
for the first time.

Principal risks and uncertainties 
A fundamental tenet of establishing, 
prioritising and managing the risk profile of 
the company is a consistent assessment of  
the probability and impact of risk occurrence. 
In common with many organisations and 
reflecting good practice, Pearson uses a 
probability versus impact matrix (PI matrix) 
for this purpose. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information57

Principal risks: status and 2020 change

)
l
a
n
o
i
t
a
r
e
p
o

,
l

a
n
o
i
t
a
t
u
p
e
r
,
l

a
i
c
n
a
n
fi

(

t
c
a
p
m

I

e
r
e
v
e
S

j

r
o
a
M

e
t
a
r
e
d
o
M

r
o
n
M

i

11

10

13

3

2

9

6

8

14

1

4

5

7

12

15

Net risk 

Probability and impact are based on residual risk, i.e. after 
taking into account controls already in place and assumed  
to be operating effectively.

The probability of these impacts being realised with current 
controls and mitigations in place is then considered, to 
establish an overall impact for each risk, or ‘net/residual’ risk. 
This PI matrix and its detailed associated guidance is central 
to Pearson’s risk management framework. Mapping risks in 
this way helps not only to prioritise the risks and required 
actions but also to direct the required resource to maintain 
the effectiveness of controls already in place and mitigate 
further where required. 

The risk reporting process is carried out biannually and 
reviewed by the Audit Committee and the Board. 

t
n
a
c
fi
n
g
i
s
n

i

I

Rare

Unlikely

Possible

Likely

Almost  
certain

Probability

The impacts of each risk are assessed across five themes. Executive responsibility for these risks is outlined in alignment with our new 
organisational structure as of 2021.

 Strategy and change  Relates to the key strategic 

1 –  Business transformation  

capabilities which  
underpin our growth and 
transformation strategy. 

and change

2 –  Products and services

Executive responsibility

Chief Executive 
Chief Strategy Officer 
Chief Financial Officer

Presidents – Business Divisions 
Chief Marketing Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer 
Chief Product Office and Co-President, Direct to Consumer

 Operational

Relates to risks involving 
people, process,  
data and systems.

 Financial 

Relates to risks involving 
financial planning, 
investments, budgeting, 
potential losses of and 
exposures to Pearson’s assets.

 Legal and compliance Relates to risks in  

adhering to applicable  
laws and regulations.

3 –  Talent

Chief Human Resources Officer

4 –  Political and regulatory risk Chief Legal Officer

5 –  Testing failure

President – Global Assessment

6 –   Safety, safeguarding and 

corporate security

7 –  Customer experience

Chief Financial Officer 
Chief Human Resources Officer

Presidents – Business Divisions 
Chief Marketing Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer 
Chief Product Office and Co-President, Direct to Consumer

8 –  Business resilience

Chief Financial Officer 
Chief Legal Officer

9 –  Data

10 –  Tax

Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Legal Officer 
Chief Product Officer and Co President – Direct to Consumer group

Chief Financial Officer

11 –  Information security  
and data privacy

Chief Strategy Officer 
Chief Legal Officer

12 –  Intellectual property

Chief Legal Officer

13 –  Compliance

14 –  Competition law

Chief Legal Officer

Chief Legal Officer

 Exceptional item

Exposure to the pandemic

15 –  Pandemic

Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
 
58

Organisational risk management

COVID-19 impact and efforts 
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our 
colleagues, customers and business in terms 
of revenue and profits. COVID-19 is expected 
to remain a primary global health and safety 
concern throughout 2021 and beyond. 

Employee impact and response 

In 2020, within Pearson, we had a total of  
534 infections among our colleagues,  
which is approximately 2.6% of our global 
workforce. Sadly, October saw the death  
of a UK-based Pearson VUE colleague and  
in February 2021, the death of a finance 
colleague in South Africa. From the data 
available, our rate of infection among the 
workforce is comparable with other 
multinationals, reflecting both occupational 
and community-based infection rates.  
At our half year risk review, our total number 
of infections was 154. The increase reflects 
the global and regional trends. 

With the health and safety of our employees 
in mind, Pearson made the early decision  
to guide employees to work from home  
(WFH) seven days prior to the official UK 
Government guidance, in March. As part of 
our incident management work, we created a 
range of guidelines based on a three-phase 
approach. Throughout 2020, Pearson 
remained in Phase I, with some offices/
facilities open with safety measures in place, 
while the remainder of colleagues worked 
from home. All company travel was (and 
remains) suspended, with protective supplies 
provided to colleagues in Greater China and 
Hong Kong. Phase II allows for the openings  
of some premises and movement of staff, as 
vaccinations increase and reduced the virus 
spread. Phase III will support post-pandemic 
measures and new ways of working. 

This three-phase model reflects the  
principles that have guided us through the 
pandemic, and creates a decision-making 
framework that allows for a consistent and 
coordinated approach. 

Our response continues to prioritise safety 
and to ensure mitigating risks. This has 
required some operational changes to enable 
continuation of service at our test centres and 
processing sites. New controls for any return/
access to offices, travel and customer 
engagement activities have been shared in  
an employee handbook. Work is ongoing to 
develop future workplace strategies and 
‘people policies’ to reflect new ways of 
working following the pandemic. 

We are also supporting colleagues by raising 
awareness, sharing resources and promoting 
wellbeing to help people protect themselves 
and their families while remaining resilient, 
regardless of where they are doing their  
jobs. We continue to develop Group-wide 
wellbeing initiatives. 

PEARSON ACCESS TO OFFICES

Phase I: 
Critical operations and access to  
offices (now)

  Act on medical and government  
advice/restrictions

Phase II: 
Controlled openings (future) –  
daily measure and behaviours

  Act on medical and government  
advice/restrictions

Phase III: 
New norm – agile/blended working, 
with limited or no measures

  Monitor medical and government  
advice/restrictions

  Staff selection and wellbeing (WFH)

  Staff selection and wellbeing (WFH)

  Staff selection and wellbeing (WFH)

  Protective equipment and supplies

  Protective equipment and supplies

  Protective equipment and supplies

  Public transportation

  Measures in an office

  Sales team moves suspended 

  Suspension of company travel

  Public transportation

  Measures in an office

  Sales teams and virtual contact 

  Public transportation

  Measures in an office 

  Sales team deploy

  Suspension of company travel

  Company travel opens, per region

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information59

Business impact and response 

In 2020 we saw a significant trading impact as 
a result of COVID-19. The challenging impact 
of COVID-19 has been felt most acutely across 
our International and Global Assessment 
businesses due to test centre and school 
closures, exam cancellations, reduced global 
mobility and international economic pressure 
on spending. 

The ongoing uncertainty in 2021 gives rise to 
potential commercial risks that are actively 
being monitored by our business and finance 
teams. The impact from tougher lockdowns, 
increased infection rates and further 
operating constraints could restrict access  
to test centres and affect parts of our 
International business. 

We are actively monitoring our risk 
assumptions related to COVID-19,  
including the following: 

  We have responded to the UK Government 
announcements about the cancellation  
of A Level and GCSE exams in June and  
July 2021. We continue to work closely with 
the Department for Education, Ofqual and 
the other awarding bodies on the teacher-
assessed system that is being considered  
as a replacement for exams and expect  
any impact on our business to be modest 

  Following the decision to cancel 
international exams, we are working with 
international partners towards the teacher 
assessed grades and fairness for those 
students who were due to take IA Level  
and IGCSEs 

  Additional regional and local lockdowns  
with stricter social distancing and potentially 
curfews (in the US) could impact our Pearson 
VUE business, with test centre operations 
experiencing pent-up demand and longer 
timelines to fulfil 

  In our Pearson Test of English business,  
the impact of continued travel restrictions 
with borders remaining closed will impact 
both Australian immigration and our UK 
Secure English Language Test (SELT) 
offerings, although the longer-term  
prospects remain strong

Stakeholder impact 

In the height of the pandemic, our customers, 
schools, colleges, universities and learners 
across the world had little time to adjust to the 
new world of learning – closing physical sites 
and quickly moving online. We provided 
maximum support from the start – on a free 
basis initially – to deal with the immediate 
crisis and shift to online courses and classes. 
We provided access to free content and  
saw a significant uptake in usage. 

We believe that our prompt decision to  
help our customers in their time of need  
will lead to strengthened, more durable, 
long-term relationships. 

Looking ahead, our strong customer 
relationships, the way we supported our 
customers, and the investments we have 
made in workplace technologies and remote 
working have put Pearson in a strong position 
to continue to navigate and adapt to the  
ongoing COVID-19 environment. 

Brexit 
The UK exited the European Union (EU)  
on 31 January 2020. Given the prolonged 
negotiation process during the latter part of 
2020, we continued our mitigation planning, 
led by a Steering Committee chaired by the 
Chief Financial Officer. We worked to identify 
and mitigate any potential impact on our 
principal risks, including supply chain and 
operations (covered in the customer 
experience risk), tax and data privacy, 
treasury, workforce mobility and more.  
By virtue of that analysis and mitigation 
planning, we have not seen any impact to 
Pearson operations or colleagues because  
of Brexit, with no material adverse impact  
on Pearson as a whole. We continue to have 
contingency plans in place, as part of normal 
operational risk measures, to ensure we 
continue with business as usual. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information60

Principal risks and uncertainties

Principal risks: 2020 status, COVID-19 impact and trend in 2021 change.

 Strategy and change

Risk description

2020 activity

COVID-19 impact and 2021 trend

1 Business transformation and change

The accelerated pace and scope of our 
transformation initiatives increase our 
risk to execution timelines and to the 
business’s adoption of change.

As Pearson continues its digital transformation, the efforts 
to reshape our business processes, systems and operations 
are making substantial progress.

N

We successfully concluded our major restructuring 
programme delivering the expected cost efficiencies.

We continued to roll out our global Enterprise Resource 
Planning (ERP) system successfully across our Asia markets.

 No impact – all activities kept on plan. 

  Trend – potential for increased risk as new 

organisational structure and financial 
reporting processes are realigned in order  
to pursue the new strategy, as outlined in  
full year 2020 results and strategy update.

M

  Medium impact – despite a challenging 
landscape, we were able to keep pace  
with the changing needs of our customers’ 
education programmes across our  
global geographies.

  Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

M

  Medium impact – with efforts concentrated 

on supporting colleagues working  
from home. 
New ways, systems, and tools to work 
virtually, strong line manager support,  
and frequent communications from  
the Chief Executive and CHRO, reinforcing 
the importance of mental and physical 
wellbeing. 

  Trend – potential for increased risk as 

lockdowns continue to impact physical  
and mental health of employees. Plans and 
ownership in place.

2 Products and services

Failure to successfully invest, develop 
and deliver innovative, market-leading 
global products and services that will 
have the biggest impact on learners  
and drive growth.

In our products and services teams, increased provision  
of digital content, coaching webinars to facilitate the 
transition to online learning as well as regular dialogues 
with key customers to identify areas for improvement  
and opportunities.

3 Talent

Failure to attract and retain the talent  
we need and to create the conditions in 
which our people can perform to the 
best of their ability.

We also successfully transitioned many students to  
online and digital solutions to support remote and  
online learning demands.

People development

We continue to monitor retention, workload, morale and 
our talent succession plans. We created an integrated talent 
and learning model to help build a more inclusive learning 
culture for our employees and to realise our ambition of 
becoming ‘the world’s leading learning company’ inside and 
out. This included launching our new capabilities framework 
to support employee upskilling and reskilling, designing a 
simplified personal development plan for employees, and 
delivering our first-ever Global Learning at Work Week.

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I)

We are committed to being anti-racist and to creating a 
more inclusive culture where everyone feels a sense of 
belonging. We created a new Global DE&I task force to help 
us identify 50 concrete actions to improve recruitment, 
retention and inclusion, and to ensure our products build  
a more inclusive society. This included sharing race and 
ethnicity data for the US and UK to benchmark and  
measure progress. 

Employee engagement

Feedback from employee pulse surveys continues to  
be encouraging, as we support a focus on learning and 
development and working flexibly. The arrival of a new  
Chief Executive will give long-term direction, while 
simultaneously raising expectations for changes. 

4 Political and regulatory risk

Changes in governments, policy and/or 
regulations have the potential to impact 
business models and/or decisions  
across all markets.

In the UK, we continued to build Pearson’s position as a 
leader, expert and innovator in general qualifications, 
technical/vocational education and assessment.

In the US, we positioned Pearson as an innovator in the 
education and workforce space, among both parties, in 
state capitals, on Capitol Hill and with the US administration.

Globally, we also maintained positive engagement and 
dialogues with state, federal and national education bodies.

L

  Low impact – we were part of industry 

representations as the various government 
relief plans aimed at helping institutional 
establishments and learners navigate the 
evolving pandemic restrictions.

  Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information61

 Operational

Risk description

5 Testing failure

Failure to deliver tests and assessments 
(e.g. for UK Qualifications, School 
Assessments and Pearson VUE) and 
other related contractual requirements 
because of operational or technology 
issues, resulting in negative publicity 
impacting our brand and reputation.

2020 activity

COVID-19 impact and 2021 trend

Our Pearson Performance Centres (PPCs) remained open 
(where locally permitted) and operational, a testament to 
our test centre staff.

H

We successfully recertified across a range of regulatory, 
industry and customer requirements, ensuring our 
commercial obligations remained fit for purpose. 

In the UK, the summer exam season for A Level and GCSE 
exams was cancelled by the Department for Education;  
as a result we continued to work with regulators and 
schools towards assisting with the teacher assessment  
and grading process.

  High impact – significant, with initial 

restrictions and lockdowns forcing the 
cancellation of some tests. We pivoted  
to ensure medical staff were able to  
take qualifications in support of the 
pandemic response.

  Trend – potential for increased risk.  

This is being managed and mitigated as  
far as possible.

6 Safety, safeguarding and corporate security

A variety of risks that can cause harm  
to our people, assets and reputation 
continue to evolve as our company 
does. While some risk has reduced  
due to outsourcing and divestiture,  
the diverse nature of our people’s 
activities requires continued focus, 
resource and improvement to reduce 
the potential for harm.

The Pearson H&S policy is approved 
annually and covers a range of 
activities, behaviours and requirements 
across the company.

7 Customer experience

Failure of either our current (or future) 
operations, supply chain or customer 
support to deliver an acceptable service 
level at any point in the end-to-end 
journey; or to accelerate Pearson’s 
lifelong consumer, learner strategy.

8 Business resilience

Failure to plan for, recover, test or 
prevent incidents involving any of  
our products, customers and our 
businesses’ locations. 

Incident management and technology 
disaster recovery plans may vary in 
ability/comprehensiveness across  
the Group.

9 Data

Inability to utilise our data to achieve 
market intelligence and increase 
productivity and efficiency, while 
managing market risk impacts arising 
from customer concerns around  
use of student data, may significantly 
affect management of our core 
operations and achievement of  
our strategy objectives.

Throughout 2020, we continued to ensure our colleagues’ 
safety, security and welfare remained a priority.

M

During the year, we transitioned to adopt flexible and 
remote working practices as the pandemic took hold.

Our incident management framework was fully utilised 
and saw eight regional teams manage day-to-day activities 
across a range of challenging topics. 

  Medium impact – we were able to remain 
ahead of government announcements  
and worked through restrictions, with our 
own phased approach and safe practices  
put in place.

  Trend – potential for increased risk.  

This is being managed and mitigated as  
far as possible.

In 2020, ensuring our customers were able to receive a 
seamless service and support was a key priority. 

M

Despite the changeable working environment, Pearson 
teams were able to continue supporting learners at home 
via remote connectivity.

Our PPCs and staff were supported and supplied with 
protective equipment throughout the year.

  Medium impact – we were able to keep 

customers informed and supported as the 
pandemic took hold and delivered new  
areas of service. 
Our legacy strength with providers  
and third parties ensured continued  
global operations.

  Trend – constant with matters under  
good ownership and management.

Direct and prolonged incident management support  
to key office locations following the activation of working 
from home.

Support to business lines as the move to online/digital 
gained momentum.

L

  Low impact – legacy efforts and plans were 
fit for purpose and agility where challenges 
presented themselves allowed for a strong 
response to the pandemic, with positive 
lessons learned.

  Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

The introduction of the data-handling model allowed 
colleagues to enhance our ability to utilise data to  
achieve market intelligence and increase productivity  
and efficiency. 

 No impact – all activities kept on plan. 

N

  Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information62

Principal risks and uncertainties

 Financial

Risk description

10 Tax

Legislative change caused by the OECD 
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting 
initiative, the UK exit from the EU,  
or other domestic governments’ 
initiatives, including in response to  
the European Commission state aid 
decision regarding the UK Controlled 
Foreign Companies (CFC) exemption, 
results in a significant change to the 
effective tax rate, cash tax payments, 
double taxation and/or negative 
reputational impact.

2020 activity

COVID-19 impact and 2021 trend

L

 Lowimpact – any tax legislative changes 

which may occur as a result of the pandemic 
continue to be monitored.

 Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

State aid – further to the appeal made to the EU General 
Court, work has continued on the implications of the 
decision. Post year end Pearson received Charging Notices 
requiring a payment on account of materially all of the 
alleged State Aid to be made. A payment of £100m was 
made on 8 March 2021. The Group expects to recover the 
funds in due course. The Group continues to be of the  
view that no provision is required in respect of this issue.

Reputational risk – the fourth annual tax report has been 
published. The GRI 207 Tax Standard is effective for reports 
and other materials published after 1 January 2021 and we 
are expanding our tax reporting agenda to reflect this.

Legislative changes – the Group continued to assess and 
monitor proposed changes in the international tax 
framework, including proposals to address the tax 
challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy.

 Legal and compliance

Risk description

2020 activity

COVID-19 impact and 2021 trend

11 Information security and data privacy

We have from time to time experienced, 
and may continue to experience in the 
future, security breaches of our 
systems despite our best efforts to 
prevent them. 

We also risk failure to comply with data 
privacy regulations and standards.  
The above could result in damage to the 
customer experience, our reputation, 
and a breach of regulations and 
financial loss.

12 Intellectual property

Failure to adequately manage, procure, 
protect and/or enforce IP rights 
(including trademarks, patents, trade 
secrets and copyright) in our brands, 
content and technology may impair  
the value of our core assets,  
or reduce profits. 

Information security

We continued to review and update security protocols over 
the data we created, secured, used and stored for 
adherence to all applicable local and national data 
requirements. 

We also evolved and proactively improved our protective  
cyber capabilities, recognising the increased potential for  
phishing and other cyber activities/threats detected and 
warned of during COVID-19.

Operating risk saw a reduction as stronger compliance and 
user control took effect.

Data privacy

We assessed new laws and regulations that came into 
being and successfully implemented a readiness plan for 
the new Brazilian data protection law. 

We introduced a programme toolkit for use by our Privacy 
Champions to assess and improve our privacy processes 
and protocols across the company. 

In 2020 we continued to reduce our multiple brand 
identities, streamline and strengthen Pearson’s brand, and 
patent key strategic technology assets.

We continued targeted IP enforcement against key third  
parties of Pearson copyright (piracy), brands and patents.

L

N

N

 Lowimpact – with proven processes and 
protections in place, allowing colleagues  
to successfully work from home. 
Minor system modifications made to ensure 
controls remain in place and proactive and 
regular awareness of potential threats 
shared with colleagues.

 Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

 Noimpact– with controls maintained.

 Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

 Noimpact – with controls maintained.

 Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information63

 Legal and compliance continued

2020 activity

COVID-19 impact and 2021 trend

In 2020 we continued to enhance our compliance culture with  
our annual Code of Conduct being verified by all employees. 

N

 No impact – with controls maintained.

We saw good improvements across our sanctions compliance, 
with the risk of exposure reduced as a result.

Increased SpeakUp efforts and therefore reporting over the  
last two years has led us to revise our investigations policy and 
playbook, and we created a Compliance Council to ensure 
appropriate governance of decision-making for disciplinary  
and remedial actions.

  Trend – constant with matters under 
good ownership and management.

We continued to support a global network of Pearson lawyers  
to ensure continued understanding of and compliance with 
Pearson’s Antitrust Policy, and to spot and escalate antitrust 
issues in the geographies and businesses they support for 
purposes of maintaining Pearson’s antitrust controls.

 No impact – with controls maintained.

N

  Trend – constant with matters under good 

ownership and management.

Risk description

13 Compliance

Failure to effectively manage 
risks associated with compliance 
(principally anti-bribery and 
corruption (ABC) and sanctions 
risk), including failure to vet  
third parties, resulting in 
reputational harm, ABC liability, 
or sanctions violations.

The Compliance & ABC policy is  
a group wide requirement that 
ensures colleagues and partners 
are complaint with our internal 
guidelines, regulatory and 
industry standards.

14 Competition law

Failure to comply with antitrust 
and competition legislation 
could result in costly legal 
proceedings and fines of up to 
10% of global revenue; other 
financial consequences such  
as class actions, damages,  
void contracts could adversely 
impact our reputation. 

Risk efforts in 2021 and beyond 
We view that managing our Strategic and 
Change risks are key to the long term viability 
of the company, provided that we effectively 
manage our operational, financial, legal and 
compliance risks.

Reflecting on 2020 and looking ahead to 2021 
and beyond, we will refresh our risk landscape 
to reflect external trends, our own learnings 
from the pandemic and our new, strategic 
areas of focus. This will include a refreshed 
risk profile, continued improvement of our 
risk management process and developing  
key risk indicators that support strategic 
growth and business objectives. 

Looking ahead, from 2021 onwards we intend 
to review our risk landscape and we have 
identified a series of deep dives that we will  
be performing that reflect the new direct  
to consumer and digital company strategy.  
In undertaking these deep dives we will also 
use this opportunity to review our principal 
risks to ensure they continue to reflect our  
key areas of focus moving forward.

We continue to drive a positive and 
collaborative risk culture, including improved 
awareness, key risk indicators and a strong 
control environment. With a focus that 
supports our digital transformation and 
business growth strategies, our risk review 

programme will continue to partner with 
accountable business leaders with oversight 
from our Board. 

Risk assessment of prospects  
and viability 
This section should be read together with  
the full viability statement on p122 

Pearson’s principal risks, and our ability to 
manage them, are linked to our viability as a 
company. These risks have been considered 
when preparing the viability statement. 

The Board assessed the prospects of the 
company over a three-year period, longer 
than the minimum 12 months for the annual 
going concern review. The three-year period 
corresponds with Pearson’s strategic planning 
process and represents the time over which 
the company can reasonably predict market 
dynamics and the impact of additions to the 
product portfolio. 

The Board anticipate the company to continue 
to trade profitably and retain a strong balance 
sheet beyond the three-year period, with  
the ability to meet its obligations as they fall 
due. This assumption is underpinned by 
investments made during the three-year plan 
period which are expected to continue to yield 
future returns.

The Board discusses the company’s  
three-year plan on an annual basis, taking 
account of a range of factors including market 
conditions, the principal risks to the Group, 
product and capital investment levels, as well 
as available funding. Pearson’s business 
model and businesses are discussed in more 
detail on pp16–25 

The Group acted in the first half of 2020 to 
bolster its liquidity, including the issuance  
of the £350m Social Bond in response to the 
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 
business. As a result of the pandemic, the 
Group anticipates that there will be an impact 
on profit and cash flows in 2021 due to 
lockdown and social distancing measures 
restricting access to Pearson physical 
locations, including test centres and schools. 
The impact has been modelled under several 
scenarios to ensure that the likelihood of a 
prolonged disruption has been appropriately 
considered in assessing the availability of 
funding and our ability to comply with banking 
covenants. The modelling includes a severe 
reduction in revenue, profit and operating 
cash flow to the three-year forecast, to ensure 
that the Group has adequate resources to 
manage a prolonged period of disruption.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
64

Principal risks and uncertainties

In considering the viability of the company,  
the three-year strategic plan has been 
stressed for a range of negative impacts from 
the principal risks as set out on pp60–64 of 
this report.

The key assumptions which underpin our 
three-year plan are as follows: 

1.  Virtual Learning. Virtual Schools continues 
to see growth from increased enrolments in 
new and existing schools. The ‘COVID-19 
cohort’ which drove the 2020 enrolment 
growth gradually dissipates. Online 
Program Management grows, with global 
enrolment in undergraduate and 
postgraduate online courses accelerating

2.  Higher Education. There is a continued 

downward pressure on US Higher 
Education Courseware from declining 
enrolments, with a shift in sales mix from 
print and package to digital impacting 
pricing. The transition to digital enables 
recapture of the secondary market, 
delivering growth from 2022 

3.  English Language Learning. Our 

businesses are adversely impacted in  
2021 by reduced state and private sector 
spending and lower international migration, 
but revenues recover from 2022 led by 
growth in English Assessment

4.  Workforce Skills. A small division in 2021, 

workforce is expected to show good growth 
over the three-year period, driven by  
strong demand for vocational training  
and workforce skills

5.  Assessment & Qualifications. Following a 
recovery from the impacts of COVID-19  
in 2021, our Assessment businesses see 
growth from contract wins and new  
digitally delivered products

6.  Central functions operate under an 

environment of continuous improvement  
in order to reduce costs and offset 
inflationary increases 

At 31 December 2020, the company had available liquidity of c.£1.9bn, comprising central cash 
balances and its undrawn $1.2bn RCF maturing February 2024. The company does not raise 
financing through any form of receivables or supply chain financing.

In assessing the company’s viability for the three years to December 2023, the Board analysed a 
variety of downside scenarios, including a severe but plausible scenario where the company is 
impacted by all principal risks from 2021 (weighted for probability of occurrence) as well as 
reverse stress testing to identify what would be required to either breach covenants or run out 
of liquidity.

The severe but plausible scenario modelled an impact from COVID-19 and other risks which in 
aggregate were significantly greater than seen in 2020 continuing throughout 2021 to 2022.

COVID-19 scenarios included a resurgence, with successive waves leading to retightening of 
restrictions, social distancing measures restricting access to test centres with potential for  
exam cancellations, as well as constraints on travel and migration negatively impacting college 
enrolments and demand for language assessment. 

The table below sets out the available liquidity and EBITDA headroom against the Group’s 
tightest covenant in the base case (BC) and the severe but plausible (SBP) model. 

Headroom in excess 
of £bn

BC

BC

SBP

SBP

H1 2021

H2 2021

H1 2022

H2 2022

H1 2023

H2 2023

EBITDA

Liquidity

EBITDA

Liquidity

0.6

1.4

0.5

1.3

0.6

1.3

0.3

1.1

0.6

1.3

0.3

0.9

0.8

1.2

0.4

0.8

0.7

1.3

0.4

0.8

0.8

1.2

0.5

0.7

Further comfort about the viability of the company derives from the assumptions made. 
Management actions in response to such a downturn were assumed to be limited to the 
short-term management of direct costs associated with lower sales (e.g. if exams were not 
taking place, seasonal staff would not be recruited), without assuming reductions in investment 
in declining business lines or steps to restructure the business which would likely occur in  
such a significant downturn. Our severe model also assumed that debt repayments due in  
2021, 2022 and 2023 would be repaid using cash without refinancing and that dividends would 
continue at their usual level, which could be cut if absolutely necessary.

The principal risks included in our severe but plausible model included (but were not limited to):

  Reduced sales due to COVID-19 throughout the next three years

  Weaknesses in products and services resulting in lower Group turnover

  Testing failure resulting in penalties and lower Group turnover

  Business transformation failure resulting in increased costs

  Data privacy failure resulting in lower Group turnover and rectification costs

  Breaches of laws and regulations resulting in lower Group turnover and rectification costs

  Tax risks resulting in increased tax payments

Even under a severe downside case where further declines in profitability compared to 2020  
are modelled in 2021 and 2022, the Group would maintain liquidity headroom in excess of 
£700m and comfortable headroom against covenant requirements during the period under 
assessment. This is before modelling the mitigating effect of actions that management would 
take in the event that these downside risks were to crystallise. 

The Board’s confirmation of Pearson’s viability for the three years to 2023, based on this 
assessment, is included alongside the going concern statement on p122 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information65

Governance  
report

In this section

Corporate governance
66  Letter from the Chair

69  Board of Directors

72 

73 

84 

88 

 Pearson Executive 
Management

 Corporate  
governance review

 Nomination & Governance 
Committee report

 Reputation & Responsibility 
Committee report

90  Audit Committee report

98  Risk governance and control

Directors’  
remuneration report
100  Remuneration overview

103  Executive remuneration 

framework and 
implementation for 2021

107  Remuneration report  

for 2020

Additional disclosures
122 Report of the Directors

126  Statement of Directors’ 

responsibilities

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information66

Letter from the Chair

The Board is committed 
to the highest standards 
of corporate governance 
and sustainability,  
in the interests of all 
Pearson’s stakeholders

Sidney Taurel 
Chair

Dear shareholders,
As I have said earlier in this report, 2020 was 
one of the most challenging years in modern 
history and I have been particularly proud of 
the way Pearson colleagues came together  
to support each other and our learners, 
customers and other stakeholders.

Undoubtedly, the global pandemic has 
presented major challenges for travel and 
physical meetings that the Board would have 
expected to conduct throughout the year,  
but I am pleased to report that we were  
able to continue to operate smoothly and 
effectively by virtual means. 2020 saw the 
Board dedicate particular focus to the  
Chief Executive transition and to supporting 
both the company’s response to the global 
pandemic and its Diversity, Equity & Inclusion 
(DE&I) initiatives.

We are committed to the highest standards  
of corporate governance and the following 
pages set out further detail on our Board’s 
composition, corporate governance 
arrangements, processes and activities  
during 2020, together with our Board 
Committee reports.

Strategic focus
At the outset of 2020, the Board had 
reaffirmed its focus on Pearson’s three 
strategic priorities that underpin our vision  
of being a learner-centric business focused  
on employability and lifelong learning: the 
ongoing digital transformation of our 
traditional courseware and assessment 
businesses; investing in new structural growth 
opportunities; and continuing to take steps to 
be a simpler, more efficient and sustainable 
business. These were already strategic 

priorities for the company, which were 
enhanced and accelerated by the impact of 
the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2021, under Andy Bird’s leadership, the 
Board looks forward to supporting the 
company emerging even stronger from the 
pandemic to capitalise on the opportunities 
presented by evolving trends in our markets 
and the past work undertaken to provide 
Pearson with the foundation to succeed.  
To that end, the Board supports the focus  
on direct to consumer and the plan to 
reorganise Pearson into five global business 
divisions, to help drive our future growth. 

As part of monitoring performance, the Board 
regularly receives a dashboard that allows 
Directors to monitor progress on Pearson’s 
financial and strategic priorities, enabled by 
critical discussion of these matters at each 
Board meeting and supported by agreed 
indicators and milestones which the Board 
and management have identified as key 
measures of performance. In 2021, the Board 
will be working with management on 
identifying and monitoring new key 
performance indicators (KPIs) which 
complement the evolution of the strategy.

The Board’s focus on supporting the company 
and stakeholders through the pandemic 
included ensuring that the company leveraged 
its strong balance sheet to retain sufficient 
liquidity during a period of such 
unprecedented uncertainty, and maintaining 
an appropriate capital allocation policy.  
As I describe elsewhere, the Board views a 
very strong balance sheet as a priority while 
uncertainty remains due to the pandemic,  
and therefore at this stage does not plan to 
recommence the buyback that was paused  
in 2020.

During the year, the Board also continued to 
consider Pearson’s portfolio, assessing which 
businesses are best suited to company 
strategy, whether to acquire, retain or divest. 
This included ongoing oversight of the 
integration of Lumerit Education  G  and the 
Smart Sparrow assets acquired in 2019. 
Separately, the Board approved the 
divestment of the Pearson Institute of  
Higher Education  G  in South Africa, as part  
of the company’s ongoing de-emphasis  
of physical direct delivery businesses.  
In addition, we concluded the disposal of  
our remaining 25% stake in Penguin Random 
House to Bertelsmann and a partial early exit 
from consideration arrangements relating to 
the sale of our US K-12 learning services 
business in 2019. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information67

The Board supports the plan to review  
our portfolio further in 2021 to allow greater 
focus on the priorities of the five new  
global divisions.

Sustainability, engagement  
and culture
The importance for all stakeholders in running 
a sustainable company is a core value for 
Pearson. Engaging with, and understanding 
the views of, our stakeholders is imperative  
to developing and delivering educational 
products that meet the needs of learners, 
educators, governments and employers. 

Our historic commitment to embed 
sustainability into all business functions and 
operations remains unchanged and I have 
mentioned earlier on in the annual report  
our Sustainable Business Plan 2030 and our 
alignment to recommendations from the Task 
Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures 
(TCFD) and the Sustainability Accounting 
Standards Board (SASB). You can read more 
on this in our Sustainability section on p40. 
We are particularly proud of the success of 
our 2020 social bond and the commitments 
associated with it – see p44 for more on this. 

The Board has always been committed  
to building on and improving our DE&I.  
The Board received and inputted to several 
updates on the work of the DE&I task force 
formed during 2020 and in 2021 looks forward 
to supporting its further progress. The Board 
is committed to driving lasting impact and 
change through these initiatives and to 
Pearson setting an example within its 
industry. You can read more about our action 
plan over the next 12 to 18 months on p50 

The Board remains fully committed to 
shareholder and broader stakeholder 
engagement, both through and alongside  
our Reputation & Responsibility Committee. 
We very much enjoyed the lunch event held 
with our largest shareholders in February 
2020 and, while engagement has been more 
challenging in 2020 as a result of the 
pandemic, the Board feels the company  
has been successful in maintaining strong 
stakeholder engagement through virtual 
channels. You can read more about the 
Board’s engagement with stakeholders in  
the S172 section on p30 

During 2020, Board members continued  
to engage with the workforce, including 
considering regular pulse survey reports and 
meeting with the Employee Engagement 
Network through our Senior Independent 
Director, Vivienne Cox. You can read more 
about our employee engagement initiatives in 
the Nomination & Governance Committee’s 
report, which begins on p84 and throughout 
this Governance Report.

Also critical to our success is ensuring a 
culture that complements the delivery of our 
strategy. The Board continues to focus on 
engendering a corporate culture that is 
inclusive, innovative and meritocratic,  
and on ensuring that this aligns with the 
company’s purpose, values and strategy.  
In doing so, all Directors are committed to 
acting with integrity and leading by example. 
This report illustrates how the Board has 
monitored Pearson’s culture throughout the 
year, including through the surveys, Employee 
Engagement Network discussions and talent 
initiatives referenced above. I am proud of  
the ways in which Pearson has sought to 
support its employees through the many 
challenges that the pandemic has brought, 
including new working environments and 
wellbeing pressures.

Talent, succession and evaluation
Crucial to successful delivery of our strategy is 
attracting and retaining strong, diverse talent. 
The Board also considered the wider pool of 
talent in our senior leadership group, and the 
themes of talent, succession and DE&I form a 
continuing thread throughout the Board’s and 
Committees’ sessions. The Board conducted a 
deep dive into the company’s new workforce 
learning and development initiatives, 
designed to underpin a new talent framework. 

At an executive level, under Andy’s leadership 
we recruited a new Chief Strategy Officer, 
Mike Howells, and a new Chief Marketing 
Officer, Lynne Frank, who is also serving as 
Co-President of Pearson’s new Direct to 
Consumer group, alongside Ishantha Lokuge, 
Pearson’s Global Product Officer. These are 
very strong additions to our executive 
management team and have already made 
excellent starts as part of Andy’s team, 
bringing additional energy and expertise.

At Board level, Pearson has a fully engaged 
Board, including a strong Non-Executive  
team with a breadth of experience and 
perspectives, including finance, digital and 
technology, environmental, social and 
governance (ESG), education and public 
sector, direct to consumer and leadership of 
global organisations through periods of 
transformation and disruption.

As noted in our 2019 report and elsewhere  
in this report, following John Fallon’s 
announcement of his intention to retire as 
Chief Executive during 2020, I promptly 
accelerated the ongoing succession planning 
process with the assistance of the Nomination 
& Governance Committee. Following a 
thorough selection process, we were 
delighted to appoint Andy Bird as our new 
Chief Executive in August 2020 and he 
succeeded John on 19 October 2020.  
You can read more about the Nomination & 
Governance Committee’s activities regarding 
succession planning, and most particularly  
the Chief Executive search, on p84 

In addition to the Chief Executive and Chief 
Financial Officer appointments in 2020, at the 
upcoming 2021 Annual General Meeting 
(AGM) we will bid farewell to both Vivienne 
Cox, as her nine-year term on the Pearson 
Board reaches its conclusion, and, as recently 
announced, Michael Lynton, who will also not 
be seeking re-election in light of his other 
commitments. Vivienne and Michael have 
made tremendous contributions to Pearson, 
particularly in their respective experience of 
leading global businesses through times of 
transformation and digital disruption, for 
which the Board and I are extremely grateful. 
They have our very best wishes for their 
future endeavours.

In relation to our Non-Executive retirements, 
the Nomination & Governance Committee’s 
established succession plans are well 
progressed and the Board looks forward  
to updating shareholders in due course.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
 
Remuneration
Following work by the Remuneration 
Committee to review and update Pearson’s 
remuneration philosophy in light of the 
company’s evolving strategy, 2020 saw the 
adoption of a new remuneration policy at  
the AGM, and the Board is grateful for 
shareholders’ support. The Board is also 
grateful for the support of shareholders for 
the vote tabled at the company’s general 
meeting in September 2020, although it 
recognises and respects the concern of some 
shareholders. The Committee, led by its Chair 
Elizabeth Corley, has continued to engage with 
investors on these matters. You can read 
more about the Committee’s activities and 
Pearson’s approach to remuneration in the 
remuneration section of this report on p100 

Conclusion
I hope this report clearly sets out how your 
company is run, and how we align governance 
and our Board agenda with the strategic 
direction of Pearson. We always welcome 
questions or comments from shareholders, 
either via our website (plc.pearson.com/
en-GB/investors/investor-shareholder-
contacts) or at our AGM. While we are unlikely 
to be able to welcome shareholders in person 
to our AGM this year, due to ongoing 
pandemic restrictions, we very much hope 
that you will participate in our planned 
shareholder event in advance of the AGM, 
details of which will be included in our  
AGM notice.

Sidney Taurel 
Chair

68

Letter from the Chair

The Board evaluation for 2020 was facilitated 
externally, in accordance with the Code. I am 
pleased to report that the evaluation found 
the Board to be well-functioning and 
operating effectively, with a good quality of 
relationships between Board members and a 
strong commitment to Pearson’s purpose, 
backed by sound governance principles and 
an appropriate level of challenge and support 
for management. As the Board supports  
Andy in his early months as Pearson’s new 
Chief Executive, it continues to assess the 
balance of focus between long-term strategic 
considerations and near-term delivery, 
including, for instance, what performance 
indicators and insights are most effective for 
monitoring company performance as the 
strategy develops. You can read more about 
the Board evaluation process and findings  
on p82 

Audit, Risk and Internal Control
The Board is accountable for Pearson’s 
successes and addressing its challenges.  
We aim to communicate to you in a 
transparent manner the steps we have taken 
to ensure that we have a clear oversight of the 
business, and the work we have undertaken in 
respect of Pearson’s strategy throughout the 
year. Our Audit Committee, led by Tim Score, 
plays a key role in monitoring and evaluating 
our compliance and risk management 
processes, providing independent oversight 
of our external audit and internal control 
programmes, accounting policies and 
business transformation projects, and in 
assisting the Board in reporting in a fair, 
balanced and understandable manner to our 
shareholders. You can read more about the 
Audit Committee’s activities and priorities 
during 2020 on p90 

The UK Corporate  
Governance Code 

The principles set out in the UK 
Corporate Governance Code (the Code) 
emphasise the value of good corporate 
governance to the long-term 
sustainable success of listed 
companies. These principles, and their 
supporting provisions, cover five broad 
themes. The Pearson Board is 
responsible for ensuring that the Group 
has in place appropriate frameworks to 
comply with the Code’s requirements. 

The five themes are covered in 
particular on the following pages of the 
Governance report, with additional 
information contained in the Strategic 
report. 

This Governance report and the 
Strategic report set out how Pearson 
has applied the principles of the Code 
throughout the year. 

Read more

  Board leadership and  
company purpose

  Division of responsibilities

  Composition, succession 
and evaluation

Page

69–70

77

73, 76,  
82–87

  Audit, risk and internal control 

90–99

  Remuneration

100–121 

The Board believes that during 2020 the 
company was in full compliance with all 
applicable principles and provisions of 
the Code, save that: 

  Pearson is not fully compliant with 
Provision 36 of the Code on the basis 
that the shares awarded under the 
Chief Executive’s co-investment award 
are subject to a post-vesting holding 
period until 31 December 2023, rather 
than a total vesting and holding 
period of five years or more required 
by the Code 

  as described in last year’s report, prior 
to John Fallon’s retirement from the 
Board, the Company had set out a 
path to align his pension contributions 
to those available to the workforce 

Further detail on both matters is 
provided in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report. 

UK Corporate Governance Code
The Code can be found on the  
Financial Reporting Council’s website

www.frc.org.uk

Governance on our website 
View our compliance schedule  
on the company website

plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/
business-operations

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
 
69

Board of Directors

Pearson Board 
members bring a wide 
range of experience, 
skills and backgrounds 
which complement  
our strategy. 

All Board members have strong leadership 
experience at global businesses and 
institutions. Our Board members’ biographies 
illustrate the contribution each Director 
makes to the Board by way of their  
individual experience.

Key to Committees

A

N

RR

R

Audit

Nomination & Governance

Reputation & Responsibility

Remuneration

Committee Chair

Current notable commitments reflect other  
listed company directorships and full-time or 
executive roles.

Executive Directors

RR

Andy Bird, CBE Chief Executive
aged 57, first appointed to the Board  
1 May 2020, appointed as Chief Executive Officer 
19 October 2020

Andy has a long and distinguished career 
spanning 35 years in the media industry, and is an 
accomplished, strategic leader of global consumer 
content businesses. Most recently he spent  
14 years working for The Walt Disney Company, 
joining the business as President of Walt Disney 
International in 2004, before being appointed 
Chairman in 2008. He held this role for a  
decade, during which time he transformed the 
organisation into a digital-first, direct to consumer 
business, focused on serving the diverse needs of 
customers around the world. In addition, Andy 
worked to establish the iconic brand in China, 
through the creation of Disney English, teaching 
the English language to Chinese families through 
immersive learning experiences. 

Prior to Disney, Andy worked in a number of 
senior positions at AOL Time Warner, and spent 
the earlier part of his career at Piccadilly Radio, 
Virgin Broadcasting Company, BSB Music Channel, 
Big & Good Productions and Unique Broadcasting.

Sally Johnson 
Chief Financial Officer
aged 47, appointed 24 April 2020

Sally joined Pearson in 2000, and has held  
various finance and operations roles across  
The Penguin Group, the education business  
and at a corporate level. She brings to the  
Board extensive commercial and strategic  
finance experience as well as transformation, 
treasury, tax, risk management, business and 
financial operations, investor relations and  
M&A expertise. She has held various senior  
level roles across the business, most recently  
as Deputy CFO of Pearson. Sally is a member  
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants  
in England and Wales and trained at 
PricewaterhouseCoopers. She was also  
a Trustee for the Pearson Pension Plan  
from 2012 to 2018.

Chair

Non-Executive Directors

N R

NA

R

N R

Sidney Taurel Chair
aged 72, appointed 1 January 2016 

Sidney has over 45 years of experience in business 
and finance. He is currently a Director of IBM 
Corporation, a role from which he will be retiring 
in April 2021. Sidney is an advisory board member 
at pharmaceutical firm Almirall. He was Chief 
Executive Officer of global pharmaceutical firm Eli 
Lilly and Company from 1998 until 2008, Chairman 
from 1999 until 2008, and has been Chairman 
Emeritus since 2009. His 37-year career at Eli Lilly 
included time spent in Brazil, France, Eastern 
Europe, the US and the UK. He has previously held 
directorships at McGraw Hill Financial, Inc. and  
ITT Industries. In 2002, Sidney received three  
US presidential appointments to: the Homeland 
Security Advisory Council, the President’s Export 
Council and the Advisory Committee for Trade 
Policy and Negotiations. Sidney is also an officer of 
the French Legion of Honour.

Current notable commitments: HIG Acquisition 
Corporation (Non-Executive Director) and 
IBM Corporation (Non-Executive Director)

Dame Elizabeth Corley, DBE  
Non-Executive Director
aged 64, appointed 1 May 2014

Elizabeth has extensive experience in the financial 
services industry, having been CEO of Allianz 
Global Investors, initially for Europe then globally, 
from 2005 to 2016. She continued to act as an 
adviser to the company until the end of 2019. 
Previously she was at Merrill Lynch Investment 
Managers and Coopers & Lybrand. Elizabeth is a 
Non-Executive Director of BAE Systems plc  
and Morgan Stanley Inc. Elizabeth is active in 
representing the investment industry and 
developing standards within it. 

She is chair of the Impact Investing Institute;  
a director of the Green Finance Institute and 
serves on the investment committee of the 
Leverhulme Trust. She was appointed Dame 
Commander of the Order of the British Empire  
in the Queen’s Birthday Honours in 2019 for her 
services to the economy and financial services.

Current notable commitments: BAE Systems plc 
(Non-Executive Director), Morgan Stanley Inc. 
(Non-Executive Director)

Sherry Coutu, CBE Non-Executive Director
aged 57, appointed 1 May 2019

Sherry has extensive experience in the technology 
industry. She has also served on the boards of a 
range of companies and charities, with a focus  
on working with entrepreneurs and specialising  
in consumer digital, information services,  
and education. Sherry is the Chair of 
Founders4Schools and founder of the Scale-Up 
Institute. Previously, she was CEO of Interactive 
Investor International plc, and has served on  
the boards of Cambridge Assessment,  
Bloomberg New Energy Finance and the London 
Stock Exchange plc as well as being SID and 
Remuneration Committee Chair of RM plc. Sherry 
has started and/or invested in over 60 technology 
businesses and served on the boards of Zoopla 
plc, Raspberry Pi, NESTA, and the Advisory boards 
of the National Gallery, Royal Society and LinkedIn. 
She was appointed Commander of the British 
Empire in the 2013 New Year Honours for her 
services to entrepreneurship. 

Current notable commitments:  
Reinvent Technology Partners 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information70

Board of Directors

Non-Executive Directors

NA

RR

A

RR

A

RR

Vivienne Cox, CBE  
Senior Independent Director
aged 61, appointed 1 January 2012

Vivienne has wide experience in energy, natural 
resources and business innovation. She worked 
for BP plc for 28 years in global roles including 
Executive Vice President and Chief Executive of 
BP’s gas, power and renewables business and  
its alternative energy unit. She is Chair of the 
supervisory board of Vallourec S.A., a leader in  
the seamless steel pipe markets, and a Non-
Executive Director at pharmaceutical company 
GlaxoSmithKline plc, where she also acts as 
Workforce Engagement Director. She also  
has a deep understanding of regulatory and 
government relationships. She serves as Chair of 
the Rosalind Franklin Institute and Vice Chair  
of the Saïd Business School (part of Oxford 
University). She was appointed Commander of the 
British Empire in the 2016 New Year Honours for 
her services to the economy and sustainability. 

Current notable commitments: GlaxoSmithKline 
plc (Non-Executive Director), Vallourec S.A.  
(Chair of the supervisory board)

Linda Lorimer Non-Executive Director 
aged 68, appointed 1 July 2013

Michael Lynton Non-Executive Director
aged 61, appointed 1 February 2018

Linda has spent almost 40 years serving higher 
education. She retired from Yale in 2016 after  
34 years at the university where she served in an 
array of senior positions including Vice President 
for Global & Strategic Initiatives. She oversaw  
the development of Yale’s online education 
division and the expansion of Yale’s international 
programmes and centres. During her tenure, she 
was responsible for many administrative services, 
ranging from Yale’s public communications and 
alumni relations to sustainability, human 
resources and the university press. She also 
served on the boards of several public companies, 
including as Presiding Director of the McGraw-Hill 
companies. Linda is a member of the board of  
Yale New Haven Hospital, where she chairs the 
nominating and governance committee and is a 
trustee of Hollins University. She also remains on 
several consequential advisory committees at  
Yale University.

Michael has more than 30 years of senior-level 
management experience, including extensive 
experience in consumer marketing, traditional 
and digital media, and the adoption of new 
technologies. He also has broad public company 
governance experience. Michael served as CEO  
of Sony Entertainment from 2012 until 2017, 
overseeing Sony’s global entertainment 
businesses. He was also Chairman and CEO of 
Sony Pictures Entertainment from 2004. Prior to 
that, he held senior roles within Time Warner  
and AOL, and earlier served as Chairman and  
CEO of Penguin Group where he extended the 
Penguin brand to music and the internet. Michael 
is Chairman of Snap, Inc., Schrödinger, Inc. and 
Warner Music Group, and currently serves on the 
boards of IEX, Ares Management Corporation LLC 
and The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Current notable commitments:  
Ares Management Corporation LLC  
(Non-Executive Director), Snap, Inc. (Chairman), 
Schrödinger, Inc. (Chairman), Warner Music Group 
(Chairman), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.  
(Non-Executive Director)

A RR

NA

R

A RR

Graeme Pitkethly Non-Executive Director
aged 54, appointed 1 May 2019

Tim Score Non-Executive Director
aged 60, appointed 1 January 2015

Lincoln Wallen Non-Executive Director
aged 60, appointed 1 January 2016

Graeme joined Unilever in 2002 and, prior to  
being appointed CFO and Board member,  
was responsible for Unilever’s UK and Ireland 
business. Previously, he had held a number of 
senior financial and commercial roles within 
Unilever, including Senior Vice President of 
Finance for Global Markets, Group Treasurer, 
Global Head of M&A and Chief Financial Officer  
of Unilever Indonesia. Graeme spent the earlier 
part of his career in senior corporate finance  
roles in the telecommunications industry with 
FLAG Telecom, and started his career at 
PricewaterhouseCoopers. Graeme is currently 
Vice Chair of the Task Force on Climate Related 
Financial Disclosures, Vice Chair of the 100 Group 
Main Committee and is a Chartered Accountant.

Current notable commitments: Unilever plc  
(Chief Financial Officer)

Tim has extensive experience of the technology 
sector in both developed and emerging markets, 
having served as Chief Financial Officer of ARM 
Holdings plc, the world’s leading semiconductor  
IP company, for 13 years. He is an experienced 
non-executive director and serves as Chairman  
of The British Land Company plc, a role to which 
he was appointed in July 2019, a non-executive 
director of HM Treasury, and a Trustee of the 
National Theatre. Tim has garnered extensive 
financial and listed company experience during 
previous and current positions. He served on the 
board of National Express Group plc from 2005  
to 2014, including time as interim Chairman and 
six years as the Senior Independent Director. 
Earlier in his career Tim held senior finance roles 
with Rebus Group, William Baird, LucasVarity plc 
and BTR plc.

Current notable commitments: The British Land 
Company plc (Chairman)

Lincoln has extensive experience in the 
technology and media industries, and is currently 
CTO of Improbable, a technology start-up 
supplying next-generation cloud hosting and 
networking services to the video game industry. 
Lincoln was CEO of DWA Nova, a software-as-a-
service company spun out of DreamWorks 
Animation Studios in Los Angeles, a position  
he held until 2017. He worked at DreamWorks 
Animation for nine years in a variety of leadership 
roles including Chief Technology Officer and Head 
of Animation Technology. He was formerly CTO at 
Electronic Arts Mobile, leading their entry into the 
mobile gaming business internationally. Lincoln is 
a Non-Executive Director of the Smith Institute for 
Industrial Mathematics and Systems Engineering. 
His early career involved 20 years of professional 
IT and mathematics research, including as a 
reader in Computer Science at Oxford. 

Current notable commitments:  
Improbable (Chief Technology Officer)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information71

Governance at Pearson

Board of Directors

Board Committees

The Board has established four formal Committees. The Committees 
focus on their own areas of expertise, enabling the Board meetings to 
focus on strategy, performance, leadership and people, governance 
and risk, and stakeholder engagement, thereby making the best use of 
the Board’s time together as a whole. The Committee Chairs report to 
the full Board at each Board meeting following their sessions, ensuring 
a good communication flow while retaining the ability to escalate items 
to the full Board’s agenda if appropriate.

Pearson Executive Management (PEM)
The PEM team consists of Andy Bird (Chief Executive) and his direct 
reports. They are the executive leadership group for Pearson, 
responsible for delivering Pearson’s strategy under clearly defined 
accountabilities and in line with agreed governance and processes.

Audit  
Committee

Appraises our financial management and reporting 
and assesses the integrity of our accounting 
procedures and financial controls. The Committee 
also oversees risk, compliance and internal audit.

 Chief Executive

 Chief Financial Officer

 Chief Human Resources Officer

 Chief Legal Officer

 Chief Marketing Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer

 Chief Product Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer

 Chief Strategy Officer and Interim President – Workforce Skills

 Head of Telecom and Technology Partnerships

 President – Assessment & Qualifications

 President – English Language Learning

 President – Higher Education

 President – UK & Global Online Learning (stepping away in 2021)

 President – Virtual Learning

Nomination  
& Governance  
Committee

Reviews corporate governance matters, including 
Code compliance and Board evaluation, considers 
the appointment of new Directors, Board 
experience and diversity, and reviews Board 
induction and succession plans as well as wider 
workforce engagement.

Remuneration  
Committee

Determines the remuneration and benefits of the 
Executive Directors and oversees remuneration 
arrangements for the Pearson Executive 
Management team, as well as remuneration  
policies for the wider workforce.

Reputation & 
Responsibility 
Committee

Considers the company’s impact on society and the 
communities in which Pearson operates, including 
to ensure that strategies are in place to manage and 
improve Pearson’s reputation.

 see p72

FLOW OF INFORMATION

Standing Committee

A Standing Committee of the Board is established to approve certain 
operational and ordinary course of business items such as banking 
matters, guarantees, intra-Group transactions and to make routine 
approvals relating to employee share plans. 

The Committee has written terms of reference, reviewed and approved 
each year, which clearly set out its authority and duties. These can be 
found on the company website at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/
business-operations.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information72

Pearson Executive Management

The Pearson Executive Management team outlined below is presented under the new organisational structure that comes into effect as of 2021.

Tom ap Simon President –  
Virtual Learning
aged 42

Tim Bozik President –  
Higher Education
aged 59

Tom has 19 years of international 
business and finance experience.  
At Pearson, he has led the Virtual 
Schools business, worked in finance 
for the emerging markets 
businesses and led M&A activity  
in the US. Previously, he worked in 
investment banking at RW Baird. 
Tom holds an MA in Economics  
and Politics from the University  
of Edinburgh.

Tim has more than 30 years of 
extensive leadership experience in 
higher education products and the 
business of delivering them at 
Pearson. Tim earned a Bachelor’s 
Degree from the University of  
Notre Dame and currently serves  
on the Board of Directors for the 
Association of American Publishers.

Rod Bristow
aged 63

After 35 years’ service, Rod Bristow  
is stepping away from his role as 
President of Pearson UK and 
President of Global Online Learning 
in 2021. Rod has worked in education 
for more than 30 years in the UK and 
internationally. Rod is a trustee for 
the Education and Employers 
Taskforce, a fellow of the Royal 
Society for Arts, governor for  
Harlow College and the BMAT multi-
academy trust. Rod is a graduate of 
University College London.

Lynne Frank Chief Marketing 
Officer and Co-President,  
Direct to Consumer
aged 54

Lynne has over 25 years of 
experience in the media industry. 
Previously, she has worked in 
companies such as WarnerMedia, 
ESPN/Disney and Turner 
Broadcasting. Lynne holds a degree 
in economics and business, and a 
certificate in corporate board 
governance from the University of 
California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

Gio Giovannelli President – 
English Language Learning
aged 48

Albert Hitchcock Head of Telecom 
and Technology Partnerships
aged 56

Gio has over 25 years of 
international business experience, 
including four CEO roles in Brazil, 
one of which was Grupo Multi. 
Previous board roles include 
BOVESPA-listed Natura and  
CVC Viagens. Gio graduated  
from Bocconi University, holds  
an Economics Ph.D. and is  
OPM graduate of Harvard  
Business School. 

Albert has over 30 years of 
experience in the technology 
industry. Previously, Albert was 
Pearson’s Chief Technology and 
Operations Officer (2014–2021), 
Group CIO at Vodafone, as well as 
Global CIO at Nortel Networks. 
Albert is a Chartered Engineer  
and a Fellow of the Institute of 
Engineering & Technology.

Mike Howells Chief Strategy 
Officer and Interim President – 
Workforce Skills
aged 44

Mike has more than 20 years of 
international business experience. 
Previously, he has worked in the 
British diplomatic network and the 
UK Foreign, Commonwealth and 
Development Office. Mike holds a 
masters degree in International Law 
from the University of Nottingham 
and an Anthropology degree from 
University College London.

Ishantha Lokuge Chief Product 
Officer and Co-President,  
Direct to Consumer
aged 53

Ishantha has more than 20 years of 
Silicon Valley experience. Previously, 
he was at Shutterfly, eBay and 
Healtheon/WebMD. He holds 
degrees in computer science  
from Brandeis and Tufts, as well  
as a graduate degree in Media Arts 
and Sciences from the 
Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology (MIT) Media Lab.

Cinthia Nespoli Chief Legal Officer
aged 40

Cinthia has 17 years of international 
legal experience. Previously, she has 
worked in the manufacturing sector 
at multinational companies. Cinthia 
was admitted to the Brazilian bar  
in 2004 and earned her law degree 
from Pontifícia Universidade 
Católica de Campinas and a post-
graduate degree in tax law from 
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de 
São Paulo.

Anna Vikström Persson Chief 
Human Resources Officer
aged 51

Bob Whelan President – 
Assessment & Qualifications
aged 72

Anna Vikström Persson has over  
20 years of international HR 
experience. Previously, Anna held 
executive positions at Sandvik, SSAB 
and Ericsson. Anna has a certificate 
in German and a masters in law, as 
well as professional HR qualifications 
from both London Business School 
and Michigan Business School.

Bob has over 40 years of significant 
expertise in testing and assessment. 
Previously, Bob worked at Personnel 
Decisions International, as well as 
National Computer Systems (NCS) 
which Pearson acquired in 2000.  
Bob earned his BA from the 
University of Alabama in finance  
and economics.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information73

Corporate governance review

BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMPOSITION

Board of Directors

Gender balance

Ethnicity

Nationality

Tenure1

 Female

 Male

5

6

 Mixed

 White

1

9

 American

 American/British (dual)

 British

 Canadian

Pearson Executive Management (PEM)

Gender balance

Ethnicity

Nationality

 Female

 Male

3

7

 Asian

 White

 Other

1

7

2

 American

 British

 Italian/Brazilian (dual)

 Swedish

2

3

5

1

4

3

2

1

 Under 3 years

 3-6 years

 Over 6 years

3

3

3

1  Chart shows tenure of Chair and 

Non-Executive Directors.

This data represents those in 
office at 31 December 2020.

BOARD SKILLS, EXPERIENCE AND BACKGROUND

Current skills

Succession planning focus1

  Accounting and finance

  Prior leadership  

 Digital and technology

  Disruption, including

– talent leadership through change

    – marketing and data insights

    –  new business models  
and innovation

 Direct to consumer business models

   Educational experience

 Focus on people and talent

   Global markets

experience, particularly of 
multinational businesses

  Diversity

   Remuneration

 Educational experience

   Scale and complexity experience

  Prior leadership  

 Sustainability and ESG

experience, particularly of 
multinational businesses 

 Transformation

 Scale and complexity experience

  UK plc experience

  UK plc experience

For further details on succession planning, 
see p76 

1  These areas of focus reflect priorities for 
deepening existing skills and experience,  
or to address upcoming retirements.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
74

Corporate governance review

Board of Directors
Composition of the Board – As at the date of this report, the Board 
consists of the Chair, Sidney Taurel, two Executive Directors: the Chief 
Executive, Andy Bird, and Chief Financial Officer, Sally Johnson, and 
eight independent Non-Executive Directors. 

Independence of Directors – All of the Non-Executive Directors who 
served during 2020 were considered by the Board to be independent 
for the purposes of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code).  
The Board reviews the independence of each of the Non-Executive 
Directors annually. This includes reviewing their external appointments 
and any potential conflicts of interest as well as assessing their 
individual circumstances in order to ensure that there are no 
relationships or matters likely to affect their judgement. In addition to 
this review, each of the Non-Executive Directors is asked annually to 
complete an independence questionnaire to satisfy requirements 
arising from Pearson’s US listing and the Code. In January 2021,  
Ms Cox reached nine years’ service on the Pearson Board. Upon 
attainment of nine years’ service by any Non-Executive Director, the 
Board undertakes an assessment in accordance with Provision 10 of 
the Code to satisfy itself as to the continuing independence of that 
Director. In addition, we require each Non-Executive Director to 
provide confirmation of their independence on an annual basis  
(as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the New York Stock Exchange 
(NYSE) listing rules and the Code). Accordingly, the Board is satisfied 
that Ms Cox remains independent, and that she continues to provide 
constructive challenge and hold management to account. Ms Cox will 
not be seeking re-election at the 2021 AGM.

Directors’ commitments and conflicts of interest – Under the Companies 
Act 2006 (the Act), the Directors have a statutory duty to avoid conflicts 
of interest with the company. The company’s Articles of Association 
allow the Directors to authorise conflicts of interest. The company has  
an established procedure to identify actual and potential conflicts  
of interest, including all directorships or other appointments to, or 
relationships with, companies that are not part of the Pearson Group 
and which could give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest. 

Additionally, in response to Provision 15 of the Code, Pearson  
has developed internal guidance to be taken into account when 
considering changes to a Director’s commitments, or when appointing 
a new Director, as well as formalising the Board approval process for 
such matters.

Once notified to the company, any potential conflicts and 
commitments are considered for authorisation by the Board at its  
next scheduled meeting or, where necessary in the interests of 
timeliness, by a Committee comprising the Chair, Senior Independent 
Director and Company Secretary. In particular, the Board or Committee 
considers the type of role, expected time commitment and any impact 
which this may have on the Director’s duties to Pearson, as well as  
any relationships between Pearson and the external organisation.  
The interested Director is not permitted to vote, or be counted in the 
quorum, for any resolution relating to his/her commitments, conflict or 
potential conflict. The Board reviews any authorisations granted on an 
annual basis. 

As noted in our 2019 annual report and following the significant vote 
against the re-election resolution at our 2020 AGM, Mr Lynton and the 
Chair agreed to review Mr Lynton’s situation over the course of 2020 in 
relation to his other, external, commitments. Mr Lynton has since been 
additionally appointed to the board of The Boston Beer Company, Inc. 
Mindful of Pearson’s own internal guidance and shareholder sentiment 
regarding Directors’ commitments, it was agreed that Mr Lynton would 

not seek re-election at the 2021 AGM, as confirmed to the market  
on 4 February 2021. On this basis, the Board accepted Mr Lynton’s 
additional appointment to the Boston Beer Company board, given  
that there is only a short period until he steps down at the 2021 AGM. 
To date there has been no impact on Mr Lynton’s ability to commit to 
the Pearson Board, and he has demonstrated a full attendance record 
at Pearson since his appointment in 2018. There were no other new 
commitments of Directors during 2020 which the Board considered to 
be significant in nature. 

The role and business of the Board
The Board is deeply engaged in developing and measuring the 
company’s long-term strategy, performance, culture and values.  
We believe that it adds a valuable and diverse set of external 
perspectives and that robust, open debate about significant business 
issues brings an additional discipline to major decisions.

The key responsibilities of the Board include:

  overall leadership of the company and setting the company’s values 
and standards, including monitoring culture and DE&I initiatives 

  determining the company’s strategy, including in relation to ESG 
matters, in consultation with management, reviewing performance 
against it and overseeing management’s execution of it

  major changes to the company’s corporate, capital, management and 
control structures

  approval of all transactions or financial commitments in excess of  
the authority limits delegated to the Chief Executive and other 
Executive management

  assessment of management performance, Board and Executive 
succession planning and talent pipeline

A schedule of formal matters reserved for the Board’s decision and 
approval is reviewed annually and is available on our website at 
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

Strategic planning and decision-making
The Board spends considerable time in assessing whether any 
proposed action aligns with the strategy and future direction of the 
business. In addition, regular strategy sessions enhance the Board’s 
decision-making in shaping the company’s strategic and financial  
plans, Sustainability is inherent in the Board’s strategic planning  
and decision-making. 

The Board and Committees receive timely, regular and necessary 
financial, management and other information to fulfil their duties. 
Comprehensive meeting papers are circulated to the Board and 
Committee members at least one week in advance of each meeting 
and the Board receives a regular performance dashboard and key 
milestones report and regular updates from the Chief Executive and 
Chief Financial Officer. In addition to meeting papers, a library of 
current and historical corporate information is made available to 
Directors electronically to support the Board’s decision-making 
process. The Directors can obtain independent professional advice,  
at the company’s expense, in the performance of their duties.  
All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company 
Secretary, whose appointment and removal is a matter reserved for 
the full Board. 

The Directors recognise their duties towards the shareholders and 
other stakeholders of the company as set out in Section 172 of the Act, 
and a continued understanding of the key issues affecting stakeholders 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information75

is an integral part of the Board’s decision-making process. You can read 
more on p80 about the Board’s engagement with stakeholders and an 
illustrative example of how it takes stakeholder views, and in particular 
employee feedback, into account in its decision-making. 

Board meetings
The Board held seven scheduled meetings in 2020, with discussions 
and debates focused on the key strategic issues facing the company. 
Major items covered by the Board in 2020 are shown in the table below. 
In addition to its scheduled meetings, the Board convenes as necessary 
to consider matters of a time-sensitive nature. In 2020 the Board 
convened on three occasions to consider matters relating to COVID-19 
and Chief Executive succession. Despite the additional oversight 
requirement that the company’s response to COVID-19 has placed on 
the Board, the Board is satisfied that each Director contributed to 
Board discussions and demonstrated sufficient commitment to be  
able to meet their responsibilities. As shown in the table to the right, 
each of the Non-Executive Directors attended all meetings during 
2020. In addition, the Nomination & Governance Committee confirmed 
in its annual confirmation that each Director demonstrates the 
requisite level of commitment and contribution in accordance with 
Principle H and Provision 18 of the Code. Furthermore, the Board has 
adapted well in this new, virtual, way of working which has allowed for 
greater participation from employees. The Board is capable of keeping 
in touch with the company and employees globally, and will continue to 
do so for the duration of the global pandemic and into the future. 

Board attendance
Directors are expected to attend all Board and Committee meetings, 
but in certain exceptional circumstances, such as due to pre-existing 
business or personal commitments, it is recognised that Directors may 
be unable to attend. In these circumstances, the Directors receive 
relevant papers and, where possible, will communicate any comments 
and observations in advance of the meeting for raising as appropriate 
during the meeting. They are updated on any developments after the 
meeting by the Chair of the Board or Committee, as appropriate. 

Board meeting focus during 2020

Individuals’ attendance at Board and Committee meetings is 
considered, as necessary, as part of the formal review of their 
performance. There was a high level of attendance by the Directors  
at Board and Committee meetings in 2020 as shown in the table  
below and in the Committee reports that follow: 

Board meetings 
attended

Chair

Sidney Taurel

Executive Directors

Andy Bird1

John Fallon2

Sally Johnson3

Coram Williams4

Non-Executive Directors

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Vivienne Cox

Josh Lewis5

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Tim Score

Lincoln Wallen

10/10

5/6

7/9

4/6

4/4

10/10

10/10

10/10

4/4

10/10

10/10

10/10

10/10

10/10

1  Mr Bird joined the Board on 1 May 2020. Mr Bird did not attend any meetings  

on the topic of Chief Executive succession when he was a candidate.

2  Mr Fallon retired from the Board on 18 October 2020. Mr Fallon did not attend 

certain meetings on the topic of Chief Executive succession.

3  Ms Johnson joined the Board on 24 April 2020. Ms Johnson did not attend any 

meetings on the topic of Chief Executive succession. 

4  Mr Williams resigned from the Board on 24 April 2020.
5  Mr Lewis retired from the Board on 24 April 2020.

Strategy 

Performance 

Leadership & 
people

Governance & risk 

  US Higher  
Education Courseware 

  2019 preliminary results and 
annual report and accounts

  Chief Executive  
succession planning

  Global Online Learning

 Direct to consumer

  Impact of COVID-19

  Oversight of 2020 operating 
plan and goals, and 
preparation for 2021

  2020 interim results and 
trading updates

  Regular dashboard and 
milestone reports

  Operating and strategic  
plan discussions

  Portfolio review

  Capital allocation

  Final and interim  
dividend proposals

  Continuing review  
of forecasts

  Impact of COVID-19, 
including liquidity 
assessment

  DE&I updates

  Talent review and  
pipeline development

  Senior Leadership 
succession planning

  Impact of COVID-19 on 
organisational health, 
including company culture 
and values

  Employee Engagement 
Network feedback

  Employee Survey 
assessments

  Workforce Learning & 
Development

Read more on employee 
engagement on p81 

  Legal and regulatory 
compliance including UK 
Corporate Governance 
Code, Companies Act and 
listed company obligations

 Brexit updates

  Board and Committees 
evaluation

  Approval of division of 
responsibilities between 
Chair and Chief Executive

  Annual review of conflicts  
of interest

  Approval of Committees’ 
terms of reference

  Data privacy matters

  Social bond

Shareholder 
engagement

  Ongoing shareholder 
consultations

  Investor relations  
strategy and share  
price performance

  Major shareholders and 
share register analysis

  Shareholder issues  
and voting

  Feedback from Chair and 
Executive Director meetings 
with shareholders

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information76

Corporate governance review

Directors’ training and induction
All Directors receive training in the form of presentations about the 
company’s operations and, where possible, through Board meetings 
held at operational locations and by visiting local facilities and 
management. Whilst during 2020, and in the immediate future, 
physical visits remain challenging, the Directors are supported virtually 
and are offered the same level of interaction where possible, albeit 
through digital means. When permitted, Directors will be encouraged 
to visit facilities and management, even if they are travelling to a 
country or region on non-Pearson business. The Company Secretary 
and General Counsel, in conjunction with Pearson’s advisers, monitor 
legal and governance developments and update the Board on such 
matters as agreed with the Chair. Our Directors can also make use of 
external courses. 

The Directors receive a significant bespoke induction programme  
and a range of information about Pearson when they join the Board. 
This includes background information on Pearson and details of Board 
procedures, Directors’ responsibilities and various governance-related 
issues, including procedures for dealing in Pearson shares and their 
legal obligations as Directors. The induction also typically includes a 
series of meetings with members of the Board, external legal advisers 
and brokers, the Pearson Executive Management team and other 
senior management, presentations regarding the business from senior 
executives, and a briefing on Pearson’s investor relations programme. 
The induction framework is reviewed by the Nomination & Governance 
Committee in advance of any Director onboarding. 

A tailored and bespoke induction programme which aligned with the 
Board’s focus areas was designed for Andy Bird, who was initially 
appointed as a Non-Executive Director in May 2020. The induction 
included business area familiarisation, participation in sessions that 
related to areas of interest, and topics that were pertinent to the 
Committees he joined. The Company Secretary sought Mr Bird’s 
feedback following completion of his induction programme,  
and Mr Bird was positive about the benefits of the programme.

Succession planning and talent
The Board considers oversight of succession planning as one of its 
prime responsibilities, assisted by the Nomination & Governance 
Committee. The company has formal contingency plans in place  
for the temporary absence of the Chief Executive for health or  
other reasons. The matter of Chief Executive succession is a regular 
item for discussion and reviewed by the Chair and the Board on an 
annual basis. 

Succession planning for the Board as a whole and for the role of Chair  
is also considered annually by the full Board and on an ongoing basis by 
the Nomination & Governance Committee, with the Chair and Senior 
Independent Director also discussing Committee Chair succession 
planning on a regular basis. See our Nomination & Governance 
Committee Report (p84) for further details on succession planning. 
Also, see our Board ‘Skills and Experience’ matrix on p73 which outlines 
competencies the Directors currently possess, as well as particular 
areas of focus that are helping to inform succession planning,  
and take into account upcoming retirements. 

There is also regular discussion and oversight by the Board of 
succession planning for key positions at Executive management level. 
The Executive team has a key role to play in both our strategic planning 
process and in succession planning and fostering the culture of DE&I 
required to continue to deliver on our strategy. 

As well as Board and Executive management succession, the Board 
also oversees our leadership pipeline. In December, the Board held a 
discussion on talent and culture, including a succession planning 
session focused on the executive pipeline from which the future 
leaders of Pearson were likely to emerge, both at Pearson Executive 
Management level and for other key roles. A diverse pipeline of ‘ready 
now’ and ‘ready later’ emerging talent has been identified, and plans 
put in place to accelerate their development and path to succession 
where possible, including through measures such as participating in 
Board and Committee meetings, mentoring by Non-Executive 
Directors, and by encouraging and enabling individuals to take on 
external non-executive roles in order to increase their exposure to new 
areas of business. The company also has targeted development 
programmes for high-potential talent and mentorship programmes  
for senior women leaders, as well as a Manager Fundamentals 
programme for middle management.

Succession planning for Executive Directors
The Chair, Sidney Taurel, keeps the matter of Chief Executive 
succession under regular consideration and, following the 
announcement in late 2019 of John Fallon’s intention to retire, 
accelerated the search process. The Board had a clear sense of  
the attributes it was looking for in the new Chief Executive – which 
included, but were not limited to, having demonstrable experience in 
corporate transformation, digital experience, a global view, and an 
ability to nurture a strong and healthy organisational culture. The 
Board recognised the challenge in securing all of these attributes in one 
individual but is pleased with the appointment of Andy Bird. The Board 
believes that Mr Bird satisfies and exceeds the initial search criteria. 

In early 2020, the Chief Financial Officer, Coram Williams, announced 
his intention to step down from the Board. Accordingly, the Board 
activated its executive succession plans which had identified Sally 
Johnson, who was the Deputy CFO, as a ‘ready now’ candidate to 
succeed Mr Williams as Chief Financial Officer. Mr Taurel and  
Ms Cox, Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Nomination & 
Governance Committee, led discussions on behalf of the Board which 
resulted in the recommendation of Ms Johnson as CFO-elect, a matter 
which the Board approved in principle in January 2020. Pearson 
announced that Ms Johnson would join the Board and assume the 
position of Chief Financial Officer at the conclusion of the 2020 AGM, 
with Mr Williams stepping down from the Board at that time. 

The Board continues to monitor ‘ready now’ and ‘ready later’ 
candidates, ensuring that Pearson has a diverse pipeline and 
succession plan. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information77

DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

There is a defined split of responsibilities between the Chair and the executive leadership of Pearson. The roles and responsibilities of the 
Chair, Chief Executive and the Senior Independent Director are clearly defined, set out in writing and reviewed and agreed by the Board on 
an annual basis. These can be found on the company website at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

The Chair is primarily responsible for the leadership of the Board 
and ensuring its effectiveness. He ensures that the Board upholds 
and promotes the highest standards of corporate governance, 
setting the Board’s agenda and encouraging open, constructive 
debate of all agenda items for effective decision-making.  
He regularly meets the Chief Executive to stay informed and 
provide advice. He also ensures that shareholders’ views are 
communicated to the Board.

Chair’s significant commitments There were no changes  
to the Chair’s significant commitments during 2020. Mr Taurel  
will be stepping down as a Non-Executive Director of IBM 
Corporation with effect from the date of their 2021 annual  
meeting of shareholders. 

The Chief Executive is responsible for the operational 
management of the business and for the development and 
implementation of the company’s strategy as agreed by the Board 
and management. He is responsible for developing operational 
proposals and policies for approval by the Board, he promotes 
Pearson’s culture and standards, and is one of the key 
representatives of the company to its external stakeholders. 

The Senior Independent Director’s role includes meeting regularly 
with the Chair and Chief Executive to discuss specific issues, as well 
as being available to shareholders generally should they have 
concerns that have not been addressed through the normal 
channels. She also leads the evaluation of the Chair on behalf of  
the other Directors.

Independence of Chair In accordance with the Code, Sidney Taurel 
was considered to be independent upon his appointment as  
Chair on 1 January 2016.

Chair – Sidney Taurel

Chief Executive – Andy Bird

Senior Independent Director – Vivienne Cox

Culture, 
purpose  
and values

Pearson’s core values – to be brave, 
imaginative, decent and accountable – 
go to the heart of our purpose: to help 
everyone achieve their potential 
through learning, and the Board and 
employees are committed to 
demonstrating these characteristics 
throughout their work and discussions.

The Board endorses Pearson’s culture 
of innovation, fostering talent and 
inclusivity at all levels, and 
demonstrated this during the year by 
engaging with employees from across 
Pearson through a variety of events.

The Board monitors the culture and 
organisational health of the company 
with the assistance of its Committees, 
including through regular updates from 
the Chief Human Resources Officer  
on talent, DE&I and Pearson’s values  
as well as considering Group-wide 
programmes such as the Code of 
Conduct, compliance, Health & Safety, 
and learning initiatives.

During 2020, and with the help of the 
Chief Human Resources Officer,  
we introduced a dashboard drawing 
together key cultural indicators from 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationacross the Group. The dashboard provides the Nomination & Governance Committee with a quantitative framework which the Board utilises alongside other inputs of a more qualitative nature, enabling the Directors to evaluate Pearson’s organisational health to monitor  and assess company culture.During 2021, the Board will continue to pay attention to Pearson’s culture as the company’s vision, mission and values evolve in support of our strategy. Learn more:For examples of Board decision-making, see our COVID-19 case study on p79 and our employee engagement case study on p81.78

Corporate governance review

GOVERNANCE RESPONSE TO COVID-19

This timeline illustrates a number of key events and initiatives which took place throughout the year at Pearson and provides  
a high-level indication of the impacts of COVID-19 upon the work of the Board, its committees and broader corporate governance 
framework in the business.

Preparation

March

Market Disclosure 
Committee (MDC)

Introduction of more regular MDC 
meetings to consider COVID-19 
impact on trading, culminating in 
an additional trading update  
on 23 March 2020 including the 
decision to pause the share 
buyback programme

March

Board and all committees

As lockdown and travel 
restrictions were introduced,  
the Board and committees moved 
to fully online meetings

April

Board

An extra Board meeting was  
called at short notice to consider 
the financial and workforce 
implications of COVID-19.  
See opposite

April 

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee’s regular 
business resilience deep dive 
considered the early stage 
response to COVID-19 in  
impacted regions from an 
operations, continuity and 
technology perspective

Response and adjustment

June

Board

The Board’s strategy sessions 
included consideration of impacts 
of COVID-19 on Pearson’s focus 
areas of investment which 
informed their discussions as  
to investment priorities

April

April

Board and all committees

Board and Company

The Board considered input from 
the Executive team on how Pearson 
was responding to changing 
customer needs. All committees 
considered COVID-19 impacts on 
their areas of focus. All Directors 
joined all meetings for awareness  
of impacts and response

AGM arrangements changed  
as UK entered lockdown. The 2020 
AGM was held on 24 April 2020  
in a COVID-secure manner and 
shareholders were encouraged to 
submit proxy votes in advance and 
raise questions by email or post

Recovery and forward looking

Mid-year onwards

Board and Company

Increased Board focus on people 
to address Pulse survey feedback 
and increased risk of burnout, 
introduction of personal 
development opportunities and 
wellbeing initiatives e.g. Learning 
at Work Week and Pearson WELL

July

July

Remuneration Committee

Audit Committee

Decision taken to reset the 
incentive plan opportunity for 
employees below Board level  
to incentivise employees for  
the second half of 2020 on a 
proportionate basis

Half-year accounting 
considerations relating to 
COVID-19 including going  
concern assessment, cash  
flow assumptions, working  
capital, real estate matters,  
and risk factors

December

October and December

July, October and December

Remuneration Committee

Board

Reputation & Responsibility Committee

Consideration of  
remuneration trends in  
response to the pandemic 

Strategy, three-year plan and 2021 
operating plan discussed with 
consideration of COVID-19-related 
adjustments to plans 

Updates at each meeting on stakeholder groups 
affected by COVID-19, including customers and 
employees, with a focus on impacts, stakeholder 
engagement and the company’s response

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information79

Board response 
to COVID-19

This case study provides an 
illustrative example of how the 
Board has regard to relevant 
stakeholders and their interests  
in its decision-making processes,  
as required by S172 of the 
Companies Act 2006. 
As the COVID-19 pandemic took hold in early 
2020, it became clear that its impacts would 
be felt throughout society. 

In the early weeks of the pandemic and  
having monitored attentively the emerging 
effects of COVID-19 for the business and its 
prospects, including through frequent 
meetings of our Market Disclosure 
Committee, the Board took the decision to 
update the market by way of an additional 
trading statement highlighting the impacts  
of COVID-19 on the business, setting out a 
framework for assessing the potential impact 
of the pandemic on future trading and 
confirming our decision to pause the £350m 
share buyback programme as a way of 
preserving liquidity at a time of uncertainty. 

As a Board, we were of the view that Pearson 
should offer support to as broad a range  
of stakeholders as possible during this 
challenging period, and were conscious of  
the need to balance internal and external 
demands and to prioritise use of resources. 
Accordingly, the Chair called an additional 
meeting of the Board in mid-April 2020 to 
consider financial scenario planning and  
the company’s broader response to the 
pandemic. Our key areas for discussion at  
this meeting were: 

  whether to continue to recommend 
payment of the final dividend for 2019,  
as announced at our preliminary results  
in February 2020 

  following government announcements 
disclosing details of the support schemes 
available for businesses, whether or  
not to furlough staff and access these 
funding schemes

In considering these key issues, the Board  
had regard to a set of financial priorities and 
guidelines which had been proposed by the 
Executive team in order to manage the 
COVID-19 response consistently across  
the business. These were framed around 
projected timelines for a global lockdown 

Summary of key Board decisions

Shareholders

Customers

We continued to  
pay dividends and 
paused the share 
buyback programme

We made available 
free resources to  
aid online learning.  
See p13 and p29 

Society 
and broader 
stakeholders

All Directors  
made voluntary 
donations to charities 
supporting COVID-19 
response efforts.  
See p116 

Liquidity

We were able to 
leverage our strong 
balance sheet  
to avoid the  
need to access 
government funding

Employees

We did not furlough 
any staff, instead 
redeploying where 
necessary to support 
greatest areas of need 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationperiod and were matched to financial scenario-planning which had been introduced in the early stages of the pandemic across three different scenarios. The priorities and guidelines included measures which struck a balance between the need to protect the company’s liquidity and profitability during that exceptional period, the impacts on our employees, the interests of our shareholders and learners, broader reputational considerations, and ensuring that we maintained a healthy and sustainable business that would be able to seize  the opportunities we envisaged in the medium- and longer-term as a result of the accelerated shift to online learning and new ways of working. The Board also had regard to the views of,  and potential impact on, stakeholder groups including through:  input from brokers and advisers who conveyed the views and interests of the shareholder base  close discussion with the HR function and senior management in respect of workforce considerations, including the possibility  of furlough or redeployment as well as concerns such as the impact of new working conditions for the workforce and how best to provide support to employeesAs part of the decision process,  the Board considered:  the strength of Pearson’s balance sheet and existing levels of access to liquidity   the extent to which the scenario-planning and input from brokers and advisers had taken into account the possibility of a second wave of the pandemic later in the year or other worst-case scenarios  moralandreputationalconsiderationsassociated with the issues of dividend paymentandstafffurlough,withrecognitionof the support provided to the company by shareholdersandemployeesthrough recenttransformationactivityandnotingthe importance of that continued support to Pearson’s post-pandemic successThroughitsoversightofPearson’sresponsetothepandemic,theBoarddemonstrateditsregardformultiplestakeholdersinitsdecision-makingandbalancedtheirinterestsin order to best promote the success of  the company.80

Corporate governance review

Engagement with stakeholders
A strong understanding of our stakeholders and their views is integral 
to Pearson’s strategic planning process, and the Board’s strategy 
sessions are informed by the views and needs of a wide range of 
stakeholders including customers (such as learners and educational 
institutions), technology companies, authors, shareholders, members 
of our Digital Advisory Network, Pearson management and the  
wider workforce.

As required by the Code, the Board ensures that Pearson engages 
effectively with, and encourages participation from, its key 
stakeholders. The Board maintains its oversight through a variety  
of direct and indirect mechanisms, where possible, and the Reputation 
& Responsibility Committee monitors the Group’s stakeholder 
engagement framework. 

More information on Pearson’s key stakeholders, including their  
areas of concern and our response, is set out in the Strategic report  
on pp28–29. Further information on how the Directors discharge their 
duties under S172 of the Act is available on p30 

Engagement during 2020
Whilst direct engagement with stakeholders has been challenging for 
the Board to undertake during a period of prolonged lockdown  
and travel restrictions, the views of stakeholders have been a key 
consideration in papers presented to the Board and its Committees 
and during Boardroom discussions, thus influencing strategic planning 
and decision-making. This ensured that, whilst physical engagement 
was not possible for most of the year, the Board made sure that 
stakeholders still had a voice within the Boardroom. Board members 
are of the opinion that, despite the difficulties presented by the 
pandemic, they were able to virtually engage with the company’s 
stakeholders. Some examples of the key activities undertaken by the 
Board or by individual Directors in relation to stakeholder matters are 
set out below. For a more detailed look into how the Board has been 
able to focus on employee engagement, see the following page.

ENGAGEMENT WITH STAKEHOLDERS EXAMPLES

General approach
The Board considered the needs  
of various stakeholders as a  
result of the pandemic. This is 
demonstrated by the company’s 
provision of free services to 
learners (e.g. UK Learns, on which 
the Board received presentations, 
product demonstrations and 
provided feedback). Through 
discussions the Board was also 
able to consider the acceleration  
of the company’s strategy and 
online presence, as well as future 
opportunities with employers and 
new partners, all whilst providing 
an immediate benefit to the 
consumer, employers and the 
community as a whole, and 
ensuring that the actions taken 
were financially viable and 
therefore continuing to support 
internal stakeholders and  
our shareholders. 

Learners
Consideration was given to the 
views of consumers, educators 
and educational institutions  
on teaching and learning during 
the pandemic, including their 
usage and perceptions of  
Pearson products. 

Product demonstrations and 
communication meant there was a 
continual feedback mechanism 
between the company and 
external stakeholders, which  
was fed back to the Board. 

Examinations
Due to the disruption in exams in 
the UK (and internationally), there 
was frequent engagement with 
government and regulators, 
educators, institutions and 
learners by Pearson (including 
senior management), with the 
Board providing guidance and 
listening to the views of these 
diverse stakeholder groups.  
This also enabled the Board to 
consider future strategy and 
difficulties that may persist if the 
COVID-19 pandemic continues.

Diversity
The Board recognises the 
importance of diversity and 
encourages the company’s 
approaches in addressing this 
subject matter. As such, the  
Board has been supportive of the 
strategies suggested by the DE&I 
task force, the formation of which 
was led by the Chief Executive at 
the time, John Fallon. 

The priorities of the DE&I task 
force are to address issues of 
importance to stakeholders, 
including making Pearson 
products and services anti-racist, 
collaborating to reform the 
education systems and ensuring 
that representation at 
management levels reflect the 
racial and ethnic diversity of the 
geographies in which we operate. 
Ms Cox also met with members of 

Shareholders
Shareholders are, and will remain, 
a key consideration in Board 
decision-making. Although, 
unfortunately, the Board was 
unable to engage in person with 
shareholders at the 2020 AGM  
and later General Meeting, 
shareholders were invited to ask 
any questions of the Board by 
submitting questions in advance of 
the meetings. The Board has been 
able to continue its dialogue 
throughout the year with our 
largest shareholders, including 
extensively in relation to the 
appointment of our new Chief 
Executive. This is in addition to  
the in-person lunch and product 
demonstrations held in February 
2020 with the five largest 
shareholders. Furthermore,  
as the pandemic persists, the 
Board is committed to offering 
shareholders additional methods 
of communication. This is 
demonstrated by the online 
shareholder event to be held prior 
to the 2021 AGM.

the task force to discuss how the 
Board considers its own diversity, 
and to learn more about the  
work of the task force first hand. 
Board diversity was an area of 
attention for the task force and  
the Nomination & Governance 
Committee agreed to increase its 
target for Directors of colour. 
During 2020 the Board received 
regular updates in the form of 
presentations and Board papers, 
enabling the Directors to 
participate in the implementation 
of strategic initiatives, asking key 
questions and offering opinions  
as needed. 

Topics discussed during the  
year included the adoption  
of a new Code of Conduct and 
revising talent and recruitment 
policies, both of which relate to  
our employees. 

In addition, the Board has 
endorsed a review into the 
company product and services 
portfolio to eliminate and prohibit 
bias, and to better represent our 
customers and business partners. 

As a result of this, the Reputation & 
Responsibility Committee has 
committed to developing a 
pipeline of more diverse authors. 
See more on pp88–89 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
81

Employee 
engagement 

This case study provides an 
illustrative example of how the 
Board has had regard to employees 
and their interests in its decision-
making processes. 
Whilst the Board took stakeholders views into 
account when making decisions during 2020, 
it is recognised that engagement was 
impacted due to COVID-19. For more 
information on the Board’s decision making 
with regards to COVID-19, see p79. Despite 
physical interactions being limited, the 
Directors established a number of methods  
to engage with employees throughout the 
year. The Board recognises that Pearson 
employees are integral to the business and 
therefore made sure that, in a year of 
upheaval, employees were listened to, 
appreciated, supported and rewarded. 

At the beginning of 2020 there was little 
comprehension of the year to come.  
The Employee Engagement Network (EEN) 
had established a feedback mechanism 
between the Board and the workforce, which 
enabled the Board to hear directly from 
employees, as well as creating an opportunity 
to gain additional insight on how to enhance 
employee satisfaction and work effectiveness, 
and help engage and retain high performers. 
This feedback is primarily by a designated 
Non-Executive Director, Vivienne Cox, 
engaging with a panel of employee 
representatives who reflect geographical, 
generational, operational and cultural 
diversity as well as length of service. Following 
each EEN meeting, Ms Cox updates the Board 
on matters discussed. As part of a review of 
the EEN’s effectiveness, feedback was sought 
from employee representatives. Areas that 
members were invited to comment on 
included accountability, the feedback 
mechanism and the Network’s ability to 
engage with the rest of the workforce. As a 
result, EEN members are now encouraged to 
seek feedback and perspectives on issues 
from colleagues to ensure that the Board 

It gives me access to engage with Executive 
management and the Board and contribute in 

conversations that shape our organisation for the better.

John Mahlangu Employee Engagement Network member

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationreceives a broader range of responses, thereby allowing Directors to be aware of,  and understand, broader employee sentiments and make decisions accordingly. These quarterly meetings have also been periodically attended by the Chief Executive and Chief Human Resources Officer. Key topics highlighted in 2020 included working from home, returning to the office, learning and development, wellbeing, diversity and inclusion and the culture of the business.  This proved insightful, given the remote nature of working during 2020. Following Andy Bird being announced as  Chief Executive, as he was unable to visit the various company locations, operational sites or meet face-to-face with senior management and employees, Mr Bird led global town halls, participated in functional team meetings  and also put in place a series of monthly videos, where he would discuss anything of importance to the company, employees,  the wider society, or him personally. The ‘Ask Andy’ forum was also established, which was set up so employees could share comments, feedback and questions with Mr Bird, to which he personally responds. This enabled Mr Bird to get to know employees both formally  and informally.The Board also receives the results of the quarterly employee surveys, which the entire workforce is encouraged to participate in, and which provide an oversight into employee health and wellbeing, as well as employees’ opinions on DE&I initiatives and the company’s management. The survey also gives employees an opportunity to provide written feedback, which is summarised and,  if there are underlying trends or common themes, presented to the Board.The Reputation & Responsibility Committee also had sessions on employee health and wellbeing during the pandemic. As a result  of this, the Committee decided to explore additional options to support those on the front line. Key outcomes for 2020Despite the difficulties 2020 presented, the Directors have been provided with insights into how employees feel about the culture and diversity of Pearson, as well as gauging employee satisfaction more generally. Specific examples include the Directors identifying areas where employees needed additional support, and acting accordingly. As a result, five actions were announced to help support employees, including a paid shutdown in response to health and wellbeing concerns. The Pearson WELL programme was also announced, which will be rolled out globally  in 2021. This is a research-based approach  to improving employee wellbeing and productivity as a consequence of feedback from both the survey and the EEN and has been endorsed by Directors. Internally facilitated interviews, to be led  
by the Chair, Senior Independent Director  
and/or Company Secretary as appropriate

2019

  understanding of risks facing the company, including probability  
and mitigation

In-depth evaluation, externally facilitated

2020

82

Corporate governance review

Board evaluation
The Board operates a three-yearly evaluation cycle which employs a 
variety of methodologies to ensure the most effective results.

Three-yearly evaluation cycle

Year

Methodology

Questionnaire, tailored to specific needs  
of the business

Last 
undertaken

2018

1

2

3

Approach and methodology
This Review of the Board’s effectiveness was carried out by an external 
facilitator, Jan Hall Consulting Limited (trading as ‘No. 4’), which 
operates as an independent advisory firm. This Review was conducted 
as a facilitated self-evaluation. 

No. 4 was selected following a review by the Nomination & Governance 
Committee of various providers and consideration of the potential 
scope of the evaluation. In addition to facilitating the Board evaluation, 
No. 4 was also engaged by Pearson in relation to Senior Executive 
search activity during the year, but otherwise has no other connections 
to the company or individual Directors.

EVALUATION PROCESS

No. 4 interviewed each of the Board Directors, and also the 
Executive team members and others closely involved with the 
Board, all on a confidential and unattributable basis.

The No. 4 Review sought the views of Directors on the effectiveness 
of the organisation and dynamics of the Board and the Committees, 
the papers and topics covered at Board and Committee meetings, 
the purpose and culture of the business, stakeholder engagement, 
the relationships between the NEDs and management, and the 
composition and leadership of the Board.

The lead Partners from the external Audit and Remuneration 
advisory firms were also interviewed.

The output of the evaluation was captured in a report to the Board  
in December 2020 to enable the Directors to discuss the points 
raised by the Review.

Discussion areas covered during the individual interviews included 
matters that are important to Pearson in particular, as well as those 
items laid down in the Code and associated guidance, including: 

  the effectiveness of the organisation and dynamics of the Board and 
Committees, including composition, competencies, diversity, 

leadership, agendas, quality of the information provided, governance 
and decision-making

  relationships between the Board and senior leaders, and between 
members of the Board itself, including the remits of and interaction 
among the respective Committees and with the Board

  succession planning for Executive Directors and other senior leaders

  the company’s purpose and the Board’s monitoring of organisational 
culture and behaviours

  stakeholder engagement

  concerns and areas for improvement

The Nomination & Governance Committee reviewed the findings from 
the Board evaluation with the full Board and the evaluator at its 
meeting in December 2020. To ensure that the process was robust, 
following the December Committee meeting, No. 4 and the Senior 
Independent Director held a discussion to confirm that all the 
information provided in the report was a fair reflection of the range  
of views provided by each of those interviewed and that the 
conclusions in the report were not influenced inappropriately by 
anyone. The Committee will develop an action plan to address areas 
for improvement and will monitor progress during the year. 

In reporting back to the Board, the evaluator reported that 
conversations with Board members were positive, with unanimous 
agreement that the Board operates effectively. 

Key findings included:

  a high overall level of satisfaction with the functioning of the  
Board, the competence and capabilities of the Directors, and the 
quality of relationships between Chair, Non-Executive Directors  
and the Executive

  a high level of commitment within the Board to Pearson’s purpose 
and a recognition of the significant work done by management to set 
Pearson up for success in its mission

  positive views in relation to the performance of the Committees 
including the volume and importance of the work that they undertake 
on behalf of the Board

  the composition and size of the Board was considered to be 
appropriate, with a good balance of skills and capabilities, although it 
was acknowledged that the Board was approaching a number of 
retirements and the refreshment of its skills and capabilities was a 
priority, with succession plans in flight

  an acknowledgement that the restrictions on travel and physical 
meetings afforded by the global pandemic in 2020 had provided 
challenges for some aspects of interaction between Board members 
and with management

There was unanimous agreement that the Chair leads the Board in  
an effective manner, fulfilling Principle F of the Code. The Directors 
agreed that he demonstrates objective judgement, promotes a  
culture of openness and debate, and facilitates constructive board 
relations and the effective contribution of all Non-Executive Directors. 
This in turn supports Non-Executive Directors in fulfilling the 
requirements of Principle H of the Code in providing constructive 
challenge, strategic guidance, offering specialist advice and holding 
management to account.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information83

The main areas identified by the Board for particular focus during  
2021 were: 

  supporting the new Chief Executive in delivering on his new vision 
and strategy for the company, including evolving and monitoring 
company culture and refreshing risk analysis

  ongoing attention to the balance between strategic considerations 
and performance monitoring, including in respect of the type  
and level of information received at Board level, the balance of 
opportunities for debate and specific decision-making, the 
assessment of appropriately revised KPI reporting and consideration 
of market insights

  further supporting Pearson’s ESG sustainability agendas,  
including DE&I

  supporting the company in its ongoing digital transition, including 
ensuring it can continue to operate successfully in both digital and 
non-digital worlds where relevant

  ensuring that, despite ongoing pandemic restrictions, the Board, 
Committees and executive management continue to enhance  
their virtual interactions, including one-to-one discussions of the 
evaluation’s findings and seeking opportunities for more virtual 
engagement with the wider workforce as well as other stakeholders 
where appropriate

In addition, a number of actions were taken during the year in response 
to findings arising from the 2019 Board evaluation process facilitated 
by the Senior Independent Director. You can read more about progress 
on these in the table below. 

The Board has confirmed that these items were addressed to its 
satisfaction, with recommendations having been put into practice  
or a clear action plan identified for each.

Further, the Chair meets regularly with the Non-Executive  
Directors as a whole and these sessions include reciprocal feedback  
on the functioning of the Board to augment the formal Board 
evaluation process. 

Progress on findings of 2019 evaluation

Finding

Response/action taken

Individual evaluation
In addition to the evaluation of the Board as a whole, Executive 
Directors are evaluated each year on their overall performance against 
goals agreed by the Board, and in respect of personal objectives under 
the company’s annual incentive plan. These goals and objectives are 
linked to the key metrics for the company, including both financial and 
strategic objectives as well as goals linked to culture, talent and brand. 
Progress against each of these metrics is reviewed by the Board on a 
regular basis, as part of a dashboard of KPIs. 

The Chair leads a formal individual evaluation of each Non-Executive 
Director every other year and encourages open channels of 
communication between Directors and the Chair on an ongoing basis. 
In the Board’s opinion, these ongoing lines of communication, 
combined with a Group-wide culture which allows and encourages 
feedback at any time, provide the most effective means for evaluation. 
In assessing the contribution of each Non-Executive Director, the Chair 
has confirmed that each continues to make a significant contribution  
to the business and deliberations of the Board. The Non-Executive 
Directors, led by the Senior Independent Director, also conduct an 
annual review of the Chair’s performance, with the Senior Independent 
Director providing feedback from this review to the Chair. 

Committee evaluation
All Committees undertake an annual evaluation process to review their 
performance and effectiveness. For 2020, the Committee evaluation 
process formed part of the wider Board evaluation led by the external 
evaluator. The findings from this were initially considered by the Board 
as a whole in December 2020 and are being assessed in more detail at 
Committee level in 2021. More on this can be read in the Committee 
reports on the pages that follow.

Refinement of the strategy,  
in particular continuing to  
develop the framework 
supporting lifelong learning and  
employability and ensuring clear 
articulation of the strategy

Monitoring and challenge of the 
digital transformation, including 
scrutiny of progression metrics 
and oversight of the continued 
roll-out of digital products 

The Board acknowledges the significant progress that has been made on development of the strategy, particularly in 
respect of the articulation of the five-year strategic vision. Support for Andy Bird as he articulates his new vision and 
strategy for the company will be a key focus throughout 2021 and the Board is mindful of the need to balance the long-term 
considerations with execution of short-term goals in a challenging environment for certain parts of the business.

During 2020, the Board closely monitored progress on the digital transformation through the regular dashboard and deep 
dives on US Higher Education Courseware, the Pearson Learning Platform (PLP) and Global Online Learning.

Monitoring the risk of 
transformation fatigue within  
the organisation

Throughout 2020, the Board monitored both the impact of ongoing transformation pressures on the workforce, and also 
the impact of the global pandemic, through regular reporting of employee surveys and meetings with the Employee 
Engagement Network. 

An ongoing focus on customers, 
including appropriate market and 
behavioural insights to facilitate 
the right level of scrutiny and 
challenge by the Board

During the year, the Board received updates on the competitive landscape and discussed customer trends during its regular 
sessions on the US Higher Education Courseware business.

Additionally, the Board’s milestones dashboard contains metrics regarding Pearson’s performance in the markets in  
which the company operates, and the competitive landscape is a factor considered in any proposals relating to acquisitions 
or disposals.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information84

Nomination & Governance Committee report

Committee Chair 
Vivienne Cox

Members  
Elizabeth Corley, Sherry Coutu, 
Vivienne Cox, Tim Score and  
Sidney Taurel

Committee responsibilities include:

Appointments

Identifying and nominating candidates for Board vacancies.

Balance

Ensuring that the Board and its Committees have the  
appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence, 
diversity and knowledge to operate effectively.

Succession

Reviewing the company’s leadership needs with a view to 
ensuring the continued ability of the organisation to  
compete in the marketplace.

Governance

Reviewing and overseeing Pearson’s corporate  
governance framework, including culture and employee 
engagement, Board evaluation and training plans,  
and Board Diversity Policy.

Terms of reference

The Committee has written terms of reference which 
clearly set out its authority and duties. These are reviewed 
annually and can be found on the company website at  
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

Committee attendance 

Attendance by Directors at Nomination & Governance 
Committee meetings throughout 2020:

Meetings attended

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Vivienne Cox

Josh Lewis1

Tim Score

Sidney Taurel

7/7

7/7

7/7

2/2

7/7

7/7

1  Mr Lewis retired from the Pearson Board and the Committee on 

24 April 2020.

Role and business of the Committee
The Committee monitors the composition and balance of the Board 
and of its Committees, identifying and recommending to the Board  
the appointment of new Directors and/or Committee members.  
The Committee has oversight of the company’s compliance with,  
and approach to, all applicable regulation and guidance related to 
corporate governance matters. The Committee also oversees talent 
and succession plans for senior roles.

Following the retirement of Josh Lewis from the Board in April 2020,  
the Committee comprises four independent Non-Executive Directors 
and the Chair of the Board. The Chief Executive and other senior 
management, including the Chief Human Resources Officer,  
attend Committee meetings by invitation. All Committee  
members demonstrated a strong attendance record during the  
year (see left). In addition to the scheduled meetings held during  
2020, the Committee also met as required to consider the Chief 
Executive succession process.

As Committee Chair, I was pleased to be able to meet some of our 
larger shareholders at an event in early 2020 and I remain available  
to engage with any shareholders who have questions or comments 
about the work of the Committee.

Areas of governance focus during 2020
Throughout 2020, a key area of focus for the Committee was the 
continued consideration of the revised UK Corporate Governance 
Code, which came into effect in 2019, in particular to ensure that the 
agreed revisions to Pearson’s governance framework were working 
effectively following implementation. As part of this, the Committee 
received a status tracker at each meeting to enable it to consider the 
appropriateness and maturity of various elements of the framework. 
Notable items which the Committee discussed as part of its 
governance oversight role included:

  a review of the effectiveness of the Employee Engagement Network 
and broader range of workforce engagement mechanisms (see p81)

  development of a culture dashboard to aid the Committee and 
Board’s oversight of Pearson’s culture, reflecting cultural priorities, 
experiential indicators and external benchmarking data (see p77)

  monitoring progress against the agreed areas of focus from the  
2019 Board evaluation process (see p83)

Other areas of focus for the Committee during the year included: 
oversight of investor governance and voting policies and broader 
governance thought leadership, particularly investor sentiment in 
response to COVID-19; an annual review of the Board Diversity Policy 
and adoption of revised accompanying objectives; and preparation for 
and oversight of the externally facilitated Board evaluation process for 
2020. The Committee also received periodic updates from the Chief 
Human Resources Officer and members of the HR team in respect 
of diversity and talent initiatives across the business – see p87 for 
further detail.

Board search and appointments
A key element of the Committee’s remit is to lead the process for  
Board appointments in line with appropriate succession plans.  
The Committee has defined a set of specific criteria for potential  
new Non-Executive Directors, in particular giving consideration to the 
skills, experience and knowledge required in any candidates. Pearson 
expects all Non-Executive Directors to demonstrate the highest level of 
integrity and credibility, independence of judgement, maturity, 
collegiality and the commitment to devote the necessary time.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information85

As part of its regular succession planning activity, and with regard to 
the upcoming retirements of Ms Cox and Mr Lynton from the Board  
at the 2021 AGM, the Committee launched a Non-Executive Director 
search process in the second half of 2020. In preparing for this search, 
the Chair of the Board and all existing Non-Executive Directors were 
asked to complete a self-assessment of the skills and experience  
which they believe they each bring to the Board. The results of this 
assessment were mapped against Pearson’s areas of strategic focus 
and the anticipated Non-Executive Director retirement timelines in 
order to identify the key characteristics desired in any potential new 
Board members and the order of priority for hiring. The Committee 
agreed that it was particularly interested to identify candidates who 
would bring a combination of skills and expertise in the following areas:

Nomination & Governance Committee  
meeting focus during 2020

Appointments and succession

 Executive and Non-Executive Director succession planning and 
search activity, including appointment of Andy Bird

  Review of Directors’ commitments guidance framework

  Induction outline for new Directors including feedback from  
recent appointees 

Balance

  global or multinational executive experience, particularly relating to 
leading complex companies through digital transformations

  Membership of Board Committees

  DE&I initiatives at Pearson

  Review and approval of Board Diversity Policy and revision of 
accompanying objectives

Governance

  Board evaluation preparation and findings

  Compliance with UK Corporate Governance Code

  Review of effectiveness of the Employee Engagement Network

  Oversight of development of culture dashboard

  Review of Committee terms of reference

  Review of Chair, Chief Executive and SID responsibilities

The thorough and rigorous search process, in which around 100 
individuals were considered, yielded several highly qualified 
candidates. The Board was satisfied that Mr Bird met and exceeded  
the selection criteria and was the standout candidate and accordingly 
approved the prospective appointment of Mr Bird as Chief Executive. 
Mr Bird was not a member of the Nomination & Governance 
Committee and furthermore was excluded from any Board discussions 
or decisions relating to Chief Executive succession when he himself was 
a candidate. The prospective appointment of Mr Bird as Chief Executive 
announced in August 2020 was subject only to shareholder approval of 
certain elements of his remuneration package. Read more in the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report on p100 

Pearson was assisted in the search process by Russell Reynolds 
Associates (search activity) and Jan Hall Consulting Limited (trading as 
‘No. 4’) (advisory activity). In addition to the Non-Executive Director  
and Chief Executive search processes, Russell Reynolds Associates 
undertakes broader executive search activity for the Group and is a 
signatory to the Voluntary Code of Conduct for Executive Search Firms. 
During 2020, in addition to advisory activity relating to the Chief 
Executive search, No. 4 was engaged to facilitate the annual Board 
evaluation process.

 UK listed company governance

 digital and/or data analytics

 direct to consumer experience

Taking into account the agreed person specification, the Committee 
has engaged Russell Reynolds Associates to undertake a search 
process for new Non-Executive Directors. In line with the objectives of 
the Board’s Diversity Policy, the Committee has asked Russell Reynolds 
Associates to ensure that the list of candidates reflects diversity of 
gender and ethnicity as well as diversity in its broadest sense.

At the end of 2019, following the announcement by John Fallon of his 
intention to retire from the Pearson Board, the Committee commenced 
a search process for a new Chief Executive, accelerating the ongoing 
succession planning processes which are regularly reviewed by the 
Board. The Chief Executive search process was led by the Chair of the 
Board, Sidney Taurel, and the Committee, led by Ms Cox, was engaged 
in the management of the process which was reviewed several times 
by the full Board. The search process resulted in the appointment of 
Andy Bird who became Pearson’s Chief Executive on 19 October 2020.

Andy Bird was initially identified as a potential future Chief Executive 
candidate in 2019 as part of ongoing succession planning processes 
conducted by the Board. Although Mr Bird was not in a position to 
pursue the opportunity to become Chief Executive once Mr Fallon had 
announced his intention to retire, Mr Taurel recognised that Mr Bird’s 
skills and wealth of experience would nevertheless be invaluable  
to Pearson, leading to the Board’s decision to appoint him as a 
Non-Executive Director with effect from 1 May 2020. Upon joining  
the Board, Mr Bird quickly realised the full potential of Pearson and 
became receptive to taking on the Chief Executive role.

The search process, which included internal and external candidates, 
was based upon selection criteria including traits such as:

  Highly successful experience in leading a large, international business

  Experience in digital transformation and disruption

  Track record of shareholder value creation

  Experience in brand building

  Cultural fit with Pearson values combined with the ability to effect 
and accelerate change

  An interest in education

  Strong reputation, integrity, independent thinker

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information86

Nomination & Governance Committee report

Committee evaluation
In 2020 the Committee evaluation formed part of the wider Board 
evaluation process facilitated by No. 4. The process sought views 
through a series of one-to-one interviews from all members of the 
Board, the Pearson Executive Management team, the Company 
Secretary and his deputy, and areas covered included the effectiveness 
and dynamics of the Committee, the quality of papers and meeting 
discussions and the relationships between the Committee  
and management.

The Committee was considered to have operated effectively 
throughout 2020 with a clear agenda, focused on the issues of  
greatest importance, and was led effectively by its Chair. Following  
the appointment of a new Chief Executive, it is recognised that the 
Committee will now pivot its attentions to supporting the Board in 
respect of broader executive succession planning and the development 
of the talent pipeline.

Committee aims for 2021
In 2021, the Committee will continue to pay attention to the principles 
and provisions of the Code, giving consideration to areas in which there 
may be scope to go above and beyond Pearson’s current governance 
arrangements in continuing to ensure a world-class corporate 
governance framework. We will continue to monitor Pearson’s culture 
in support of the Board’s broader oversight of culture and 
organisational health. We will also hold updates on DE&I and talent and 
succession, ensuring that the overall frameworks through which the 
Board oversees these matters are thorough and robust. Additionally, 
the Committee will oversee the Board evaluation process and monitor 
progress against the findings from the most recent cycle, and will 
continue to lead Non-Executive Director search activity, as required,  
in accordance with Pearson’s well-established succession plans.

Vivienne Cox  
Chair of Nomination & Governance Committee

Diversity across Pearson 
One of the legacies of 2020 is the elevated awareness and 
conversations around racial justice and inclusive leadership. 
The Board has taken a close interest in the company response and in 
October approved a detailed action plan setting out a series of goals 
and 50 key initiatives for implementation over the next 12 to 18 
months. The Board intends to continue to pay attention to how the 
plan is progressing and the impact it has on increasing diverse 
representation and in tackling systemic racism at Pearson. 

Our Code of Conduct sets out our global standards and responsibilities 
with regard to DE&I at all employee levels, including the Pearson 
Executive Management team, and covers many aspects, including 
gender, age, ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation. This is 
underpinned by a global statement on DE&I along with country-  
and business-specific policies. The Global DE&I Council chaired by  
Chief Executive, Andy Bird, oversees progress on the company DE&I 
strategy at Pearson. This comprises around 30 members representing 
employee resource groups, business leaders as well as allies and 
advocates. For more information on the company’s approach to DE&I, 
see p50 in the Sustainability section. 

Board diversity
The commercial benefits of having a diverse Board are well 
established. At Pearson, we believe that diversity of all types on the 
Board makes us a better business by enabling enhanced commercial 
results, and also that inclusive leadership for the company leads to 
better decision-making. It also reflects an overt commitment to finding 
and retaining the best, most diverse talent.

The Board embraces the Code’s underlying principles with regard to 
Board balance and diversity, including in respect of ethnicity, gender 
and age. The objectives set out in the Board’s Diversity Policy and our 
progress towards these objectives are shown in the table opposite. The 
Committee ensures that the Directors of Pearson demonstrate a broad 
balance of skills, background and experience, to support Pearson’s 
strategic development and reflect the global nature of our business.

The Committee also ensures that appointments are made on merit 
and relevant experience, while taking into account the broadest 
definition of diversity. In the current Non-Executive Director search 
process, the Committee has encouraged the retained search firm to 
place an emphasis on putting forward candidates who will enhance the 
overall diversity of the Board.

The gender diversity of the Board was 45% female representation as  
at 31 December 2020 (2019: 33%), exceeding the recommendations 
suggested by the Hampton-Alexander Review aimed at having at least 
33% female representation on the Board by 2020. Pearson also 
satisfies the recommendation in the Parker Review that at least one 
Director should be from an ethnic minority background ahead of the 
2021 target date. 

The Board evaluation process conducted in 2020 found that, although 
Directors believe that the Board’s diversity in terms of gender is good, 
more should be done in respect of other types of diversity, particularly 
racial and ethnic diversity. Additionally, the Board will pay particular 
attention to cognitive diversity in its succession planning and talent 
activity, ensuring that Pearson can benefit from the different 
viewpoints and ways of thinking and working demonstrated by a 
cognitively diverse group. 

In light of the global events of 2020 and reflecting Pearson’s 
commitments to create a more equitable and inclusive company,  
we are determined that, as a Board, we must also be representative of 
our employee base and wider society, including the countries in which 
we operate. We have therefore adopted revised targets in support of 
our Board Diversity policy, namely that we will strive to achieve and 
maintain a Board composition of: 

  at least 40% female Directors (previous target: 33%)

  at least two Directors of colour (previous target: one)

In addition to consideration of the Board Diversity Policy, the 
Nomination & Governance Committee continued its wider oversight  
of DE&I. This year, the Committee considered inclusion in the  
context of a wider proposal on culture as well as a detailed report on 
disability inclusion as part of the company commitment to Valuable 
500. For more information on Valuable 500, see p45 in the 
Sustainability section. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information87

Diversity and talent in Executive pipeline
On our Executive team, there are currently three women out of 10 
members (30%) – this excludes the Chief Executive and Chief Financial 
Officer who are counted in the Board’s metric (2019: 22%). Including the 
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, this rises to 33% women 
(four women out of 12 members) (2019: 18%). As of 31 December 2020, 
the number of women forming part of the senior management team, 
i.e. the Pearson Executive Management team and their direct reports, 
including the Company Secretary, as required by the Code, is 35 
women, representing 36% of that group (2019: 34%). 

We have a multi-pronged plan in place to build our pipeline of women 
in leadership and senior management positions, and the Board  
and Committee will carefully monitor their development, and the 
development of all key talent. The Committee also received an update 
on an internal mentoring scheme whereby each Director is paired with 

a high-potential female leader at Pearson. This launched at the end of 
2018 and, following a successful first cohort in 2019, the Committee 
agreed during the year that the programme should continue in 2021 
with a further cohort of participants. As part of its review of the 
mentoring scheme in 2020, the Committee also discussed learnings 
from the first year of the programme and agreed with HR certain 
additional measures to augment the support provided to both  
mentors and mentees for future cohorts.

Pearson operates a portfolio of accelerated learning and career 
development experiences targeted at the Executive pipeline.  
In 2020, the Global DE&I Council launched a pilot sponsorship 
programme for diverse talent, focusing particularly on ethnicity  
and gender. The pilot is designed to assess how sponsorship and 
senior-level advocacy in the workplace can produce career dividends 
for protégés and for their sponsors. The model has subsequently been 
adopted across the company.

Board diversity objectives
During the year, the Committee received a detailed progress update on the company’s DE&I strategic approach, framework, governance and 
measurement models and priority areas. As part of this deep dive, the Committee reviewed and updated the objectives which underpin the 
Board Diversity Policy. The current objectives, and Pearson’s performance against them, are set out below:

Objectives

Progress

We will strive to achieve and maintain a Board composition of:

  The Board includes 45% female Directors at 31 December 2020.

    at least 40% female Directors

    at least two Directors of colour.

All Board appointments will be made on merit, in the context of the skills  
and relevant experience that are needed for the Board to oversee Pearson’s 
strategic development and that reflect the global nature of our business.

The Board will continue to incorporate a focus on a diverse pipeline in its 
succession and appointment planning including to prioritise the use of search 
firms which adhere to the Voluntary Code of Conduct for Executive Search 
Firms (the Voluntary Code) when seeking to make Board-level appointments.

The Board will continue to adopt best practice, as appropriate, in response  
to the Hampton-Alexander Review and the Parker Review.

   The Board includes one Director who identifies as Mixed – White & Black 
Caribbean. Diversity, including of race and ethnic background, is a priority 
area of focus in our ongoing Non-Executive Director search process.

   The Chief Executive search process in 2020 considered a wide range  
of candidates, including from diverse backgrounds, all of whom were 
evaluated on the basis of merit. The process resulted in the appointment 
of Andy Bird whom the Board believes possesses the requisite skills and 
experience for the role.

  Russell Reynolds Associates assisted Pearson with search activity  

during 2020, including the external element of the Chief Executive search, 
and have been appointed in respect of current Non-Executive Director 
search process. Russell Reynolds Associates are a signatory to the 
Voluntary Code.

   The recommendations of the Hampton-Alexander Review and Parker 

Review in respect of gender and ethnic diversity have been noted by the 
Board, and were considered as part of the Committee’s diversity deep 
dive in 2020.

The Board will consider its composition and diversity as part of its 
consideration of effectiveness in the Board evaluation review process.

  These matters were considered in the 2020 evaluation process. 

Read more on p82 

Where appropriate, we will assist with the development and support of 
initiatives that promote all forms of DE&I in the Board, Pearson Executive 
Management team and other senior management.

 We will review and report on our progress in line with the policy and our 
objectives in the annual report, including providing details of initiatives to 
promote DE&I in the Board, Pearson Executive Management team and other 
senior management.

We will continue to make key DE&I information, about the Board, senior 
management and our wider employee population, available in the annual 
report, and aim for ongoing transparency in this area in line with best practice.

 Target achieved   Changed target   Target not met

   Board mentoring scheme of senior leadership talent ran throughout 
2019. Following its success, the Nomination & Governance Committee 
has approved a further round of the programme which will commence 
in 2021.

  The Nomination & Governance Committee reviewed the Board’s 

Diversity Policy and accompanying objectives during the year, as well as 
developments on DE&I in the external landscape.

   This information is included in the annual report. Read more about DE&I 

matters in the wider employee population on p50 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
88

Reputation & Responsibility Committee report

Committee Chair 
Linda Lorimer

Members  
Andy Bird, Vivienne Cox, Linda 
Lorimer, Michael Lynton, Graeme 
Pitkethly and Lincoln Wallen

Committee responsibilities include:

Reputation & stakeholders

Pearson’s reputation among major stakeholders, including 
governments, investors, employees, customers, learners 
and the education community.

Risk

Oversight of Pearson’s approach to reputational risk,  
and ensuring that clear roles have been assigned for the 
management of the reputation dimension of risks identified.

Sustainability & ethics

Oversight of Sustainable Business Plan 2030 and 
performance against sustainability goals and commitments. 
Ethical business standards, including Pearson’s approach  
to issues relevant to its reputation as a responsible  
corporate citizen.

Brand & culture

Management of the Pearson brand to ensure that its value 
and reputation are maintained and enhanced. Pearson’s 
approach to monitoring and supporting the values and 
desired behaviours that form our corporate culture.

Strategy

Strategies, policies and communication plans related to 
reputation and responsibility issues and the people and 
processes that are in place to anticipate and manage them.

Terms of reference

The Committee has written terms of reference that  
clearly set out its authority and duties. These are reviewed 
annually and can be found on the company website at 
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

Committee attendance 

Attendance by Directors at Reputation & Responsibility 
Committee meetings throughout 2020:

Meetings attended

Andy Bird1

Vivienne Cox

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Lincoln Wallen

3/3

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

1  Mr Bird was appointed to the Committee on 1 May 2020.

Reputation & Responsibility Committee role
The Committee works to assess and advance Pearson’s reputation 
across the range of its stakeholders and to maximise the company’s 
impact on society and the communities in which we work and serve.

The Committee reviews matters that are material to Pearson’s 
stakeholders and the company’s long-term sustainability. It regularly 
receives reports about issues and incidents that could adversely  
affect the company’s reputation, including issues raised by regulators. 
We promote Pearson’s sustainability plan and assess the progress  
in advancing its tenets as well as monitor the Pearson brand. The 
Committee works in alignment with the company’s Responsible 
Business Leadership Council, which comprises senior leaders from 
across the company. As Committee Chair, I am available to engage with 
any shareholders who have questions or comments about the work of 
the Committee.

Committee composition
Following his appointment to the Board in 2020, Andy Bird was 
welcomed as a member of the Committee and, as the new  
Chief Executive, will continue on the Committee. We benefit from  
the regular attendance of those senior executives whose work is 
central to the remit of the Committee; these include the Chief 
Marketing Officer and Co-President of Direct to Consumer, the  
Chief Legal Officer, the Chief Strategy Officer, and Senior Vice  
President – Government Relations & Sustainability. 

Areas of focus during 2020
At each meeting, the Committee has a report on recent incidents and 
issues that could have an impact on the company’s reputation. 

Throughout the year, the Committee paid particular attention to the 
impacts of COVID-19 on our stakeholder groups, and considered 
Pearson’s response across a number of different areas. In particular:

  we discussed the digital learning resources that had been made 
available free of charge to support teachers and learners during the 
early months of the pandemic. Later in the year, we revisited this topic 
with leaders of the efficacy and research team to gain insights into 
the views of teachers and learners after a number of months of using 
the products, and considered how their feedback could be taken into 
account in future product development cycles

  in conducting deep dives into health and safety and safeguarding, 
both principal risks for Pearson, we discussed the increasing 
prevalence of wellbeing issues in young people resulting from 
COVID-19. We also considered management’s approach to 
safeguarding in online schooling, a matter of considerable 
importance, particularly given the substantial increase in  
students learning online in 2020

  following the cancellation of UK exams in summer 2020,  
we considered with senior leaders from the UK business the  
impacts on schools and students and reviewed our engagement  
with the UK Government and exams regulator. We also discussed the 
lessons that could be learned from COVID-19 to help to shape the 
future of school assessment

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information89

  we focused on the impacts of COVID-19 on employees with particular 
attention on wellbeing and working practices. We considered the 
steps being taken to protect those employees working in public-facing 
roles and evaluated the framework developed to govern decisions 
around returning to the office for employees who had shifted to 
remote working, The Committee began to discuss how Pearson’s real 
estate needs might change post-pandemic with more remote or 
hybrid work arrangements likely to develop

material sustainability issues as part of our oversight of the Sustainable 
Business Plan 2030 and monitor progress towards meeting the TCFD 
recommendations. There will be continuing attention to data privacy 
and the ethical use of data, which are increasingly important matters 
as the company becomes more digital. The Committee will also 
oversee Pearson’s framework of engagement with all stakeholder 
groups and consider the broader workplace culture, as we all continue 
to evolve our ways of working and learning as a result of COVID-19.

Another key area of focus for the Committee is oversight of matters 
relating to sustainability and climate change. Sustainability is at the 
heart of many issues that are central to Pearson’s future and is a  
strong area of interest for our core customers as well as many of our 
investors. We considered the three main pillars for our Sustainable 
Business Plan 2030 and, building on our conversations in 2019, we 
discussed the detailed goals, milestones and timeline underpinning the 
plan. We monitored developments to strengthen our commitments to 
a sustainable supply chain, hearing about the implementation of a new 
sustainable supplier risk management model. Additionally, following 
discussions with sustainability colleagues on Pearson’s approach to 
climate change reporting, we recommended that Pearson become a 
supporter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures 
(TCFD); thereafter, the company publicly declared its commitment to 
the TCFD and its recommendations. You can read more about 
Sustainability on pp40–55 

Social justice was an important matter throughout the company in 
2020, as described on p27. The Committee focused on the work of  
the internal DE&I task force as it pertained to our customers.  
One initiative has been to strengthen Pearson’s editorial policy to 
ensure our products and services demonstrate diverse, equitable  
and inclusive language and content. An additional set of guidelines 
were published in February 2021 and will be used in creating new 
educational content as well as in reviewing existing content. The 
Committee also suggested ways to broaden the diversity of Pearson’s 
pool of authors, collaborators and peer reviewers so more people of 
colour are included.

Committee evaluation
In 2020, the evaluation of the Committee was included as part of the 
wider Board evaluation process led by an external facilitator, Jan Hall  
of No. 4 Consulting. She conducted one-on-one interviews with each 
Director, the Pearson Executive Management team, and the Company 
Secretary and his deputy to secure views about each Committee as 
well as the company generally. The evaluation found that all members 
felt positive about the work of the Committee, found its discussions 
thoughtful and the papers for review comprehensive. 

Progress on findings of 2019 evaluation

The 2019 evaluation, where the Senior Independent Director 
interviewed each Board member, highlighted the increasing 
importance of the Committee’s work and the growing roster of matters 
within its remit. As a result of this feedback, the Committee committed 
to scheduling four meetings each year and will endeavour to schedule 
them when either the Board Chair or Chief Executive or both can 
attend. During 2020, both the Board Chair and Chief Executive 
attended all of the Committee’s meetings.

Committee aims for 2021
Over the next year, the Committee’s work will be especially attentive  
to our growing emphasis on direct to consumer products and services 
and to overseeing the risks and opportunities associated with our 
growing consumer relationships. We will continue to explore Pearson’s 

Linda Lorimer 
Chair of Reputation & Responsibility Committee

Reputation & Responsibility Committee focus 
during 2020

Reputation & stakeholders

 Issues and incidents reports

 UK school exams – COVID-19 impact and response

  Reporting and transparency – investor feedback  
and insights

 International reputation management

 Global government relations

 Learners and institutions – supporting remote learning

 Global learner survey

 Stakeholder engagement framework

Risk

  Safeguarding

  Health & Safety

 Supply chain and partnership risk

Sustainability & ethics

  Sustainable Business Plan 2030 – strategy, pillars  
and commitments

  Sustainable supply chain

  Climate change and TCFD

  Modern Slavery Act statement

  Access to education for underserved groups

Brand & culture

 Brand update

 COVID-19 – supporting our employees

 Future workplace and return to office

Strategy

  DE&I in our products and content

  Annual communications plan

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information90

Audit Committee report

Committee Chair 
Tim Score

Members  
Elizabeth Corley, Vivienne Cox,  
Linda Lorimer, Michael Lynton, 
Graeme Pitkethly, Tim Score and 
Lincoln Wallen

Committee responsibilities include:

Financial reporting

The quality and integrity of financial reporting and 
statements and related disclosure, including significant 
reporting judgements.

Policy

Group policies, including accounting policies and practices.

External audit

Audit Committee role
The Committee has been established by the Board primarily for the 
purpose of overseeing the accounting, financial reporting, internal 
control and risk management processes of the company and the audit 
of the financial statements of the company. As a Committee, we are 
responsible for assisting the Board’s oversight of the quality and 
integrity of the company’s external financial reporting and statements 
and the company’s accounting policies and practices.

Pearson’s Vice President – Internal Audit has a dual reporting line to  
the Chief Financial Officer and to me, and external auditors have direct 
access to the Committee to raise any matters of concern and to report 
on the results of work directed by the Committee. As Audit Committee 
Chair, I report to the full Board at every Board meeting that follows a 
Committee meeting. I also work closely with the CFO and senior 
financial, risk, legal and internal audit personnel outside the formal 
meeting schedule to ensure robust oversight and challenge in relation 
to financial control, compliance and risk management. As Committee 
Chair, I was pleased to be able to meet some of our larger shareholders 
at an event in early 2020 and I remain available to engage with any 
shareholders who have questions or comments about the work of  
the Committee.

External audit, including the appointment, qualification, 
independence and effectiveness of the external auditor.

Audit Committee meetings and activities

Areas of focus during 2020

Internal audit, risk & internal control

Risk management systems and the internal control 
environment including oversight of the work and 
effectiveness of the internal audit function.

Compliance & governance

Legal and regulatory requirements in relation to financial 
reporting and accounting matters and oversight of 
compliance programmes and investigations.

Terms of reference

The Committee has written terms of reference which 
clearly set out its authority and duties. These are reviewed 
annually and can be found on the company website at 
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

Committee attendance 

Attendance by Directors at Audit Committee meetings 
throughout 2020:

Meetings attended

Elizabeth Corley

Vivienne Cox

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Tim Score

Lincoln Wallen

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

In an unprecedented year, the implications of COVID-19 were a 
consistent theme of focus for the Committee throughout 2020.  
In April, we considered Pearson’s response to, and early impacts  
from, COVID-19 in respect of areas that fall within the Committee’s 
remit, including:

  crisis management and business continuity planning – we discussed 
with risk and technology personnel the support being provided to 
employees and customers to enable them to continue to work safely 
and effectively in the developing pandemic

  financial reporting and liquidity considerations with particular 
reference to the escalation of the pandemic during March, in 
response to which Pearson issued an additional trading update to  
the market on 23 March and provided enhanced and updated 
disclosures in its external reporting to reflect COVID-19 impacts

  the decision to pause the tender process for Pearson’s external audit, 
which was made in order to ensure a fair tender process and to take 
into account additional demands on internal teams and audit firms in 
the immediate phase of response and adjustment to the pandemic

At every meeting, the Committee considered reports on the activities 
of the internal audit and compliance functions, including the results  
of internal audits, project assurance reviews and fraud and 
whistleblowing reports. The Committee also monitored the company’s 
financial reporting procedures, discussed the finance and IT controls 
environment, reviewed the services provided by PwC and considered 
any significant legal claims and regulatory issues in the context of their 
impact on financial reporting, each on a regular basis. 

A further key role of the Committee is to provide oversight and 
assurance to the Board with regard to the integrity of the company’s 
procedures for the identification, assessment, management and 
reporting of risk. During 2020, we conducted a number of deep dives 
into selected principal risks, and the key risks on which the Committee 
focused throughout the year are set out on p60 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information91

View the key activities of the Audit Committee below.

Audit Committee training and knowledge sharing

Additional meeting attendees

The Chief Financial Officer, other executives and senior managers  
from across the business also attended meetings during the year, 
either as regular invitees of the Committee or to discuss particular 
items of business. This direct contact with key leadership augments  
the Committee’s understanding of the issues facing the business as 
well as helping to develop Pearson’s talent pipeline through facilitation 
of board-level engagement opportunities for those leaders and 
managers. The Chair and Chief Executive each attend Committee 
meetings regularly at my invitation, with the Chief Executive 
particularly attending for discussion of matters with an operational 
and customer focus. The Committee also meets regularly in private 
with the external auditors and with the Vice President – Internal Audit, 
and as required with the Chief Legal Officer and  Vice President –  
Global Compliance. 

The Committee receives technical updates at each meeting, including 
on matters such as accounting standards and the audit and 
governance landscape, and members are able to request specific or 
personal training as appropriate. In particular, we have kept abreast of 
developments relating to audits at a legislative and regulatory level, 
including the FRC’s principles for operational separation for audit firms.

Committee members also meet with local management on a periodic 
basis, such as when travelling for overseas Board meetings, in order to 
gain a better understanding of how Pearson’s policies are embedded in 
operations. We hope to resume our programme of meeting in person 
with local management teams as soon as travel restrictions permit, 
and in the meantime the Committee continues to engage with a wide 
range of senior management and technical specialists through virtual 
methods in order to inform our discussions.

Audit Committee meeting focus during 2020

Financial reporting

  Accounting and technical updates

  Impact of legal claims and regulatory issues on financial reporting

  Fair, balanced and understandable reporting, going concern and 
viability statements including supporting analysis

  2019 annual report and accounts: preliminary announcement,  
financial statements and income statement

Policy

  Review of interim results and trading updates

  Form 20-F and related disclosures, including annual Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
section 404 attestation of financial reporting internal controls

  Significant issues reporting

  Accounting matters and Group accounting policies

  Treasury policy and reporting

  Annual review and approval of external auditors’ policy

  Tax strategy, including an update on EU state aid and impact of  
global tax reforms

External audit

  Provision of non-audit services by PwC

  Confirmation of auditor independence

  Receipt of external auditors’ report on Form 20-F and year-end audit

 2020 external audit plan

  Report on half-year procedures

  Reappointment of external auditors

Internal audit, risk & internal control

  Remuneration and engagement letter of external auditors

  Review opinion on interim results

  Review of the effectiveness of external auditors

  Internal audit activity reports and review of key findings

  Oversight of The Enabling Programme

  Organisational risk management 

 2021 internal audit plan

  Risk deep dives: information security; data privacy; treasury and 
insurance; anti-bribery and corruption (ABC); tax; business resilience

  Assessment of the effectiveness of internal audit function,  
internal control environment and risk management systems

  Controls Centre of Excellence updates, see more on p98 

  Appointment of new Vice President – Internal Audit

Compliance & governance

  Fraud, whistleblowing reports and compliance investigations

  Compliance with accounting and audit-related aspects of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code

  Audit Committee, Verification Committee and internal audit function 
terms of reference

 Schedule of authorities

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information92

Audit Committee report

Committee focus areas for 2021
The Committee’s focus areas for 2021 will include:

  Oversight of Pearson’s risk landscape, the approach to which will be 
refreshed reflecting: external trends; learnings from the pandemic 
response; and strategic areas of focus

  The tender process for Pearson’s external audit. See p94 for  
further information

  Oversight of the shift to five new reporting segments, reflective of  
our five new business divisions. 

Committee evaluation 
Building upon the positive findings of the previous year’s evaluation 
process, in 2020 the Committee evaluation formed part of the wider 
Board evaluation process facilitated by Jan Hall Consulting Limited 
(trading as ‘No. 4’). The process sought views through a series of 
one-to-one interviews from all members of the Board, the Pearson 
Executive Management team, the Company Secretary and his deputy, 
the Vice President – Internal Audit and the lead external audit partner, 
and areas covered included the effectiveness and dynamics of the 
Committee, the quality of papers and meeting discussions and the 
relationships between the Committee and management.

The evaluation found that the Committee is seen by all Board members 
to function well with appropriate agendas, papers produced to a good 
standard and high-quality discussions. The deep dives are perceived  
to be on the right topics and given the proper time and attention,  
and the Chair was recognised as having a constructive relationship  
with management. Risk management was a particular theme discussed 
in the evaluation process, from both a Committee and full Board 
perspective, and there was general agreement that risk is managed 
well at Pearson. One specific recommendation related to increasing  
the Committee’s focus on mapping the key risks to the sources of 
assurance, although this was not thought to be a major gap. This will be 
taken into account in the refresh of Pearson’s approach to its risk 
landscape during the coming year.

Fair, balanced and understandable reporting
We are mindful of the Code’s Principle N relating to fair, balanced  
and understandable reporting and we build sufficient time into our 
annual report timetable to ensure that the full Board receives sufficient 
opportunity to review, consider and comment on the report as it 
progresses. Learn more about fair, balanced and understandable 
reporting on p125 

Financial reporting and policies
In February 2021, the Committee considered the 2020 annual report 
and accounts, including the preliminary results announcement, 
financial statements, strategic report and Directors’ report. The 
significant issues considered by the Committee relating to the 2020 
financial statements are set out on p96.

Members
As at the date of this report, the Committee comprises seven 
independent Non-Executive Directors, all of whom have financial 
and/or related business experience due to the senior positions they 
hold or have held in other listed or publicly traded companies and/or 
similar large organisations. The Committee possesses a good balance 
of skills and knowledge with competence and experience covering  
all aspects of the sectors in which Pearson operates – education, 
digital and services – and the company’s key geographic markets.  

Financial Reporting Council (FRC)

In September 2020, the Group received correspondence from the FRC’s 
Corporate Reporting Review Team who had reviewed the 2019 annual 
report and accounts. The FRC’s role is to consider compliance with 
reporting requirements and is based solely on the Group’s published 
2019 annual report and accounts. Their review does not provide 
assurance that the 2019 annual report and accounts is correct in all 
material respects. The FRC raised two enquiries, on which the Group 
was required to respond to help the FRC Corporate Reporting Review 
Team understand how the Group had satisfied the relevant reporting 
requirements. The queries related to:

  impairment review and goodwill allocation

  supplier financing arrangements

In addition, the Group was encouraged to make improvements in 
relation to a number of observations made by the FRC on the 2019 
annual report and accounts, if material and relevant. 

In October 2020, the FRC Corporate Reporting Review Team  
confirmed that they had closed all of their enquiries. The suggested 
improvements have been incorporated into the 2020 annual report 
and accounts where material and relevant.

Risk assessment, assurance and integrity
As a Committee, we reviewed our organisational risk management 
processes and discussed risk status reports at our meetings in July  
and December. In particular, we considered three themes which run 
throughout Pearson’s principal risks – people, process and technology. 
As part of this biannual review, we consider any significant changes to 
the Group’s risk profile or new issues arising, and discuss Pearson’s  
risk map including: our appetite for key risks; the probability of these 
arising and impact if they do; and any mitigating arrangements in place. 
During 2020, we also conducted a number of deep dives into selected 
principal risks including data privacy, information security, tax, 
anti-bribery and corruption, and business resilience. You can read 
more about Pearson’s principal risks and uncertainties on p60 

At our meeting in December 2020, and again in February 2021,  
we considered the plans to evolve Pearson’s organisational risk 
management approach through an increased use of deep dives.  
These will allow our internal risk team to immerse themselves in 
particular areas of the business, including consideration of Pearson’s 
culture, and to understand associated existing and horizon risks in a 
holistic manner. As a Committee, we are supportive of this review of 
our risk environment in the context of Pearson’s new strategy and  
will receive updates on the outputs of this work at each Committee 
meeting moving forward. Read more about the Board’s responsibility 
for risk on p98 

Tim Score, Chair of the Committee since April 2015, is the company’s 
designated financial expert, having recent and relevant financial 
experience, and is an Associate Chartered Accountant. He has also 
previously served as Audit Committee Chair for The British Land 
Company plc and National Express Group plc. The qualifications and 
relevant experience of the other Committee members are detailed 
on pp69–70 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information93

Internal audit
The internal audit function is responsible for providing independent 
assurance to management and the Audit Committee on the design  
and effectiveness of internal controls, to mitigate strategic, financial, 
operational and compliance risks. The Vice President – Internal Audit 
reports formally to the Chair of the Audit Committee and the CFO and 
is responsible for the day-to-day operations of internal audit and 
execution of the annual audit plan. The Committee Chair worked 
closely with senior management on the process for appointing a new 
Vice President – Internal Audit, whose formal appointment was a 
matter for the full Committee’s approval in early 2020. 

The internal audit mandate is approved annually by the Audit 
Committee. The audit plan and any changes thereto are also reviewed 
and approved by the Audit Committee throughout the year. The 
internal audit plan is aligned to our greatest areas of risk, as identified 
by the organisational risk management process, and the Audit 
Committee considers issues and risks arising from internal audits. 
Management action plans to improve internal controls and to mitigate 
risks, or both, are agreed with the business area after each audit. 
Formal management self-assessments allow internal audit to monitor 
progress in implementing action plans, agreed as part of audits, to 
resolve any control deficiencies identified. Internal audit will request 
and assess evidence of action plan implementation and may re-test 
controls if necessary. Progress of management action plans is reported 
to the Audit Committee at each meeting. Internal audit has a formal 
collaboration process in place with the external auditors to ensure 
efficient coverage of internal controls. Regular reports on the findings 
and emerging themes identified through internal audits are provided 
to Executive management and, via the Audit Committee, to the Board.

In 2020, internal audit carried out engagements across Pearson’s 
business units and enabling functions covering the majority of the 
principal risks. The audit plan is dynamic and additional work was  
done to assess the company’s response to COVID-19, with particular 
focus on third-party risks.

Internal audit evaluation

At its December meeting, the Committee considered the findings of  
the review of the performance and effectiveness of Pearson’s internal 
audit function, a process which is undertaken annually. The 2020 
review was conducted by distributing a questionnaire to the key 
stakeholders of the internal audit function – including Committee 
members, the lead external audit partner, members of the Pearson 
Executive Management team, and senior financial, legal and 
operational management.

Based on the findings of the Committee’s assessment of the 
effectiveness of the internal audit function, the Committee is of the 
opinion that the quality, experience and expertise of the function is 
appropriate for the business. A specific area identified during the 
internal audit evaluation was to ensure that the way the function is 
staffed continues to reflect Pearson’s strategy, including through 
ensuring appropriate skills in the internal audit team in the areas of data 
analytics, programme assurance and auditing digital transformation.

In 2019, the Internal Audit function underwent its first independent 
external assessment, in line with the requirements of the International 
Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, which  
was facilitated by Protiviti. The findings indicated an effective internal 
audit function that conforms to the Institute of Internal Auditors’ 
International Standards. Opportunities for improvement noted as part 
of the 2019 assessment largely related to the quality of supporting 
documentation. In 2020, progress has been made in this respect with 
greater rigour in the documentation and review of audit engagements.

Compliance, fraud and whistleblowing
The Vice President – Global Compliance oversees compliance with our 
Code of Conduct and works with senior legal and HR personnel to 
investigate any reported incidents, including ethical, corruption and 
fraud allegations. The Audit Committee receives an update at each 
meeting on all significant investigations as well as data regarding 
matters raised through our whistleblowing reporting system, with any 
findings of the external auditors with respect to a particular matter 
considered as appropriate as part of these discussions. On behalf of 
the Board, the Committee also considers an annual review of the 
effectiveness of the whistleblowing system including through 
benchmarking against peers and monitoring progress against previous 
years’ findings. The Committee Chair’s regular reports to the Board 
include a review of whistleblowing matters of note and all Board 
members participated in a session with the Vice President – Global 
Compliance to review compliance investigations and reports for 2020.

The Pearson anti-bribery and corruption (ABC) programme provides 
the framework to support our compliance with various ABC regulations 
such as the UK Bribery Act 2010 and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices 
Act, and the Committee conducts a deep dive into the ABC programme 
on an annual basis.

In 2020, the Committee heard about enhancements to the 
investigations policy, playbook and Compliance Council. The Council is 
designed to reinforce good governance around disciplinary and other 
remedial measures necessary in response to any large investigative 
findings. In addition, both COVID-19 and the social justice movement  
of 2020 impacted the investigations programme. COVID-19 led to 
challenges in conducting investigations remotely and we saw an 
increase in reports to HR in respect of COVID-19-related matters.  
In response to the social justice movement, the Global Compliance 
Office enhanced SpeakUp efforts with employee resource  
groups, strengthened our anti-racism stance in our Code of  
Conduct, and included an ‘acts of racism’ category in our 
PearsonEthics.com platform. 

External audit

Oversight of external auditors

The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board  
in respect of the appointment and compensation of the external 
auditors. These recommendations are made by the Committee after 
considering the external auditors’ performance during the year, 
reviewing external auditor fees, conducting an effectiveness review, 
and confirming the independence, objectivity, qualifications and 
experience of the external auditors. 

In conducting its review of the effectiveness of external auditors  
and making its recommendation to re-appoint PwC for 2021, the 
Committee had regard to certain factors set out in the FRC’s Audit 
Quality Practice Aid for Audit Committees. In particular, the Committee 
considered its own observations and interactions with the external 
auditors, the annual transparency report published by PwC, including 
in relation to their internal quality control procedures, and the 
programme of work conducted by the auditors and their reports  
on that work. 

The external auditors’ effectiveness review was conducted by 
distributing a questionnaire to key audit stakeholders, including 
members of the Audit Committee and key management who interact 
with the external auditors on a regular basis, including: Chief Financial 
Officer; Deputy CFO; Vice President – Internal Audit; Vice President – 
Organisational Risk and Resilience; Vice President – Global Compliance; 
Senior Vice President – Finance for each business area; and other heads 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information94

Audit Committee report

of corporate functions. The process sought views on many aspects of 
PwC’s work and interactions with the company, including the degree to 
which they demonstrate professional scepticism, integrity and 
judgement in their work, and their mindset, skills and knowledge. 
Having reviewed the effectiveness and independence of the external 
auditors during 2020, as it does every year, the Committee is satisfied 
that the auditors provide effective independent challenge to 
management.

The findings of the evaluation, as discussed by the Committee, 
management and external auditors at the Committee’s December 
2020 meeting, included:

  overall, responses to the questionnaire were positive, indicating a 
good-quality, effective and independent external audit process

  the main area identified as presenting an opportunity for possible 
improvement related to the use of technology in audits. In response 
to this recommendation, PwC will provide the Committee and 
management with greater insights into the tools and automation 
solutions available, although it is recognised by all parties that  
the feasibility of adopting such solutions has been limited by 
Pearson’s enabling functions transformation programme (known as 
The Enabling Programme (TEP)  G ). These insights will be beneficial  
as the Committee considers the technology capabilities of the 
participating firms during the tender process in the coming year

  a small number of other minor comments were raised during the 
review, primarily relating to communication of expectations between 
the external audit and Pearson teams. PwC and management have 
committed to work together to follow up on these areas and will 
report back to the Committee in the first half of 2021

The Committee will continue to review the performance of the external 
auditors on an annual basis and will consider their independence and 
objectivity and the quality of the external audit, taking account of all 
appropriate guidelines. 

There are no contractual obligations restricting the Committee’s choice 
of external auditors. The external auditors are required to rotate the 
audit partner responsible for the Pearson audit every five years and 
the current lead audit partner, Giles Hannam, rotated onto the  
Pearson audit at the beginning of 2018.

Audit tendering and rotation

Pearson’s last audit tender was in respect of the 1996 year end  
and resulted in the appointment of Price Waterhouse as auditors. 
Developments at an EU level regarding mandatory audit rotation for 
listed companies changed the UK landscape on audit tendering and 
rotation. EU regulations, which have now been incorporated into UK 
law, and the 2014 Order by the UK Competition and Markets Authority 
(CMA) impose mandatory tendering and rotation requirements, with 
Pearson required to appoint a new auditor no later than for the 2024 
financial year end. 

In last year’s annual report, having taken account of the status of 
internal business and finance transformation programmes, the 
Committee announced its intention to proceed with an audit tender 
during 2020, with a view to changing audit firm for the financial year 
ending 31 December 2021. However, shortly after the Committee’s 
approval to proceed, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and 
associated guidance from the FRC led the Committee Chair and 
management to recommend that the tender process be put on hold,  
a recommendation which the Committee approved. 

While the pandemic and associated shifts in ways of working have 
persisted into 2021, the immediate resulting pressures that were 
evident in the first half of 2020 have eased and Pearson teams and 
external audit firms are now accustomed to operating in virtual and 
remote capacities. At its meeting in February 2021, the Committee 
therefore revisited the matter of audit tendering and agreed that it was 
appropriate to recommence the audit tender process by issuing a 
Request for Proposal (RFP) in March 2021, with a view to changing audit 
firm for the financial year ending 31 December 2022. The Committee  
is confident that the process will be run in a fair, open and transparent 
manner, notwithstanding that it will be wholly or primarily conducted 
through virtual and remote means. 

In making this decision, the Committee recalled its rationale from the 
previous year, noting that finance and management teams believe they 
have the capacity to support a tender and change in auditor, leveraging 
changes from the finance transformation programme. Although 
elements of the finance transformation are yet to be implemented in 
certain international markets, the majority of Group audit scope sits 
within North America and the UK and it is felt manageable by the 
Committee, management and the finance function to onboard a new 
auditor at a time of change in those smaller International markets.

In considering the relaunch of the tender process, the Committee 
noted that the Committee Chair had liaised with the internal working 
group during 2020 and early 2021 to keep abreast of matters 
pertaining to the paused tender process. In making its decision,  
the Committee has had regard to the detailed timeline, governance 
framework (including confirmation of the working group that will lead 
the process), independence considerations, scoring and selection 
criteria and the degree of involvement by all Committee members in 
the various stages of the process. The Committee has determined,  
with the agreement of management, that the proposed new timeline 
achieves an appropriate balance between business priorities and 
internal capacity while also allowing a rigorous and comprehensive 
audit tender process.

Following the upcoming audit tender, Pearson will adopt a policy of 
putting the audit contract out to tender at least every 10 years, as 
required. The Committee will continue to pay close attention to 
developments in the audit landscape, including the BEIS consultation 
on reforms to the audit sector, and will take these into account as and 
when appropriate. 

Compliance with the CMA Order

Pearson confirms that it was in compliance with the provisions of  
The Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation 
(Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit 
Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 during the financial year 
ended 31 December 2020.

Review of the external audit

During the year, the Committee discussed the planning, conduct and 
conclusions of the external audit as it proceeded.

At its July 2020 meeting, the Committee discussed and approved the 
external audit plan and reviewed the key risks of misstatement of 
Pearson’s financial statements. The external auditors provided an 
update at the December 2020 Committee meeting, having concluded 
that their analysis of significant and elevated risks remained the same.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information95

The table on p96 sets out the significant issues considered by the 
Committee together with details of how these items have been 
addressed. The Committee discussed these issues with the auditors  
at the time of their review of the half-year interim financial statements 
in July 2020 and again at the conclusion of their audit of the financial 
statements for the full year in February 2021.

All the significant issues were also areas of focus for the auditors.  
Learn more in the Independent auditor’s report on p128 

In December 2020, the Committee discussed with the auditors the 
status of their work, focusing in particular on internal controls and 
Sarbanes-Oxley testing.

As the auditors concluded their audit, they explained to  
the Committee:

  The work they had conducted over revenue, including over contracts 
in certain of the Group’s businesses in the US and UK that span 
year-end, where revenue is recognised using estimated percentage  
of completion based on costs and judgements in relation to 
provisions for returns

  Their work in evaluating management’s goodwill impairment 
exercise, on a value-in-use basis, including assessing assumptions 
around cash-generating unit (CGU) identification, operating cash  
flow forecasts, perpetuity growth rates and discount rates

  The impact of COVID-19 on the key accounting judgements and the 
measures which they had taken to complete their audit remotely in 
light of pandemic-related restrictions

  The work performed over the nature and presentation of non-trading 
items, focusing on subjective judgements and the transparency with 
which related adjusted measures are presented

  The work they had done to audit the provisioning levels in  
respect of potential tax exposures and uncertain tax positions  
and related disclosures and the work performed over deferred tax 
asset recoverability

  Their evaluation of the recoverability of investments in digital 
platforms and pre-publication assets

  The results of their controls testing for Sarbanes-Oxley Act  
section 404 reporting purposes and in support of their financial 
statements audit

  The results of their work over the company’s going concern and 
viability statement reports

  Their work in relation to other matters which are not classified as  
key audit matters, but may give rise to additional disclosure 
requirements e.g. pensions

  The work performed over the carrying value of investments in 
subsidiaries for the Pearson plc parent company

Auditors’ independence
In line with best practice, our relationship with PwC is governed by  
our policy on external auditors, which is reviewed and approved at 
least annually by the Audit Committee. The policy establishes 
procedures to ensure that the auditors’ independence is not 
compromised, as well as defining those non-audit services that PwC 
may or may not provide to Pearson. Any allowable services are in 
accordance with relevant UK and US legislation and auditor standards. 
The policy takes into account certain voluntary commitments by  
PwC regarding independence and applies to all Pearson businesses 
globally, including associate companies.

The Audit Committee approves all audit and non-audit services 
provided by PwC. Our policy on the use of the external auditors for 
non-audit services reflects the restriction on the use of pre-approval  
in the 2016 FRC Guidance on Audit Committees and, accordingly,  
all non-audit services, irrespective of value, are required to be 
approved by the Audit Committee. In particular, we expressly prohibit 
the provision of certain tax, HR and other services by the external 
auditor. We review non-audit services on a case-by-case basis, 
including reviewing the ongoing effectiveness and appropriateness  
of our policy. In 2020, our policy was further updated to comply with 
the FRC’s Revised Ethical Standard published in December 2019.  
The standard applies restrictions on certain non-audit services and 
applies a cap on the level of permitted non-audit services fees which 
can be billed in any year.

The Audit Committee receives regular reports summarising the 
amount of fees paid to the auditors. During 2020, Pearson spent  
£0.2m more on non-audit fees with PwC compared with 2019,  
due to an increase in fees associated with the audit of efficacy 
reporting. For 2020, non-audit fees represented 8% of external audit 
fees (6% in 2019). 

For all non-audit work in 2020, PwC was selected only after 
consideration that it was best able to provide the services we required 
at a reasonable fee and within the terms of our policy on external 
auditors. Where PwC is selected to provide audit-related services,  
we take into account its existing knowledge and experience of Pearson. 
Where appropriate, services were tendered prior to a decision being 
made as to whether to award work to the auditors.

Significant non-audit work performed by PwC during 2020 included:

  audit of Pearson’s efficacy programme

  provision of comfort letters for potential bond issues and certain  
US regulatory filings

  half-year review of interim financial statements

A full statement of the fees for audit and non-audit services is provided 
in note 4 to the financial statements on p158 

The auditors also reported to the Committee the unadjusted 
misstatements that they had found in the course of their work, which 
were immaterial, and the Committee confirmed that there were no 
material items remaining unadjusted in these financial statements.

Tim Score  
Chair of Audit Committee

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information96

Audit Committee report

Significant issues considered by the Audit Committee

Issue

Action taken by Audit Committee

Outcome

Impairment reviews

Pearson carries significant goodwill  
and other intangible asset balances. 
There are significant estimates and 
assumptions used in the impairment 
review. COVID-19 has impacted key 
assumptions in the impairment review. 
Pearson has made significant 
impairments to goodwill across a  
variety of its businesses in 
recent years.

Sales returns

The determination of appropriate 
provisions for sales returns requires a 
significant amount of judgement and,  
in the light of recent volatility in returns  
in the US Higher Education Courseware 
business, the Committee continued to 
review returns data and our policy on 
providing for returns.

Going concern and viability

The assessment of the Group’s viability 
and the appropriateness of the going 
concern assumption. 

Annual impairment review finalised  
with confirmation of sufficient  
headroom in each of the CGUs.

The Committee monitored the Group’s plans and forecasts 
during the year to determine if there were impairment 
triggers. The Committee considered the results of the Group’s 
goodwill impairment reviews which were undertaken in June 
and December. Key assumptions – including cash flows 
derived from strategic and operating plans, long-term growth 
rates and the weighted average cost of capital – were reviewed 
and challenged, particularly in light of the impact of COVID-19. 
The Committee considered the sensitivities to changes in 
assumptions and the adequacy of disclosures required by  
IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’ in relation to the Group’s  
CGUs, noting that certain CGUs still remain sensitive 
to assumption changes after a number of impairments in 
recent years. 

The Committee considered returns provisioning for the US 
Higher Education Courseware business and reviewed the 
methodology for establishing provisions. 

The Committee were particularly interested to understand the 
impact of the new digital-first strategy in North America on 
estimates associated with returns and stock obsolescence. 

Assumptions underlying the returns 
reserve methodology were reviewed  
and challenged. The Committee was 
satisfied that the level of provisions held 
for sales returns is adequate.

The Committee reviewed future budgets and cash flow 
forecasts to understand the Group’s available liquidity and 
ability to continue as a going concern. The Committee 
reviewed and challenged the risks identified to the forecasts. 
The Committee reviewed the outcome of the severe  
but plausible scenario modelling and stress testing. 

The Committee specifically considered the impact of  
COVID-19 on the budgets, cash flow forecasts and risks. 

The Committee reviewed actions to protect the Group’s 
liquidity position, including the pausing of the share  
buyback programme and the issuance of a bond.

The Committee reviewed and challenged 
future forecasts and the risks to those 
forecasts. The Committee was satisfied 
with the stress testing performed and the 
severe but plausible scenario modelling. 
The Committee noted that in all scenarios 
the Group had a high level of liquidity 
headroom and sufficient headroom 
against covenant requirements. 

The Committee was satisfied with  
the actions the Group has taken to 
protect liquidity. 

The Committee is satisfied with the 
assessment of the Group’s viability  
and is satisfied that the Group is a  
going concern. 

The Committee is satisfied with the 
disclosures related to going concern  
and viability.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information97

Issue

Action taken by Audit Committee

Outcome

Impact of COVID-19

COVID-19 has impacted the operations 
and trading performance of the Group. 
The Group assessed the impact of  
COVID-19 on specific areas of the balance 
sheet including:

  Working capital and pre-publication 
assets

 Property and leases

 Acquisition intangibles

 Pension assets

The Group assessed the impact of 
COVID-19 on liquidity and the going 
concern assessment.

Tax

The impact of tax legislation changes 
including US tax reform, EU state aid, 
proposed digital services tax, the trend 
for increased tax transparency, and 
provision levels.

The Committee considered the impact of COVID-19 on key 
areas of judgement in the balance sheet. In particular the 
Committee were interested in the impact of COVID-19 on  
the assessment of accounting estimates related to expected 
credit losses, inventory obsolescence, sales returns and the 
recoverability of pre-publication assets. 

The Committee was satisfied that  
the impact of COVID-19 has been 
appropriately reflected on the balance 
sheet. They noted that the impact of 
COVID-19 has not been significant in the 
majority of areas. 

The Committee reviewed future budgets and cash flow 
forecasts to understand the impact of COVID-19 on the 
Group’s available liquidity and ability to continue as a going 
concern. The Committee reviewed actions to protect the 
Group’s liquidity position including the pausing of the share 
buyback programme and the issuance of a bond. 

The Committee considered the adequacy of disclosures 
related to COVID-19. 

The Committee was satisfied with  
the actions the Group has taken to 
protect liquidity. 

The Committee is satisfied that the 
impacts of COVID-19 have been 
adequately disclosed and that any 
difficulties related to new ways of working 
have been adequately addressed. 

The Committee also considered the impact of COVID-19  
on ways of working, including the ability of employees to 
operate key financial controls and timelines related to  
external financial reporting. 

The Committee approved an extension  
to the year end external reporting 
timetable in light of the impacts of  
COVID-19 on ways of working.

The Committee was satisfied with 
Pearson’s approach to managing the 
impact of tax legislation changes and 
agreed with the views of management 
regarding tax provisioning levels. 

The Committee considered various developments during  
the year, including Pearson’s ongoing response to the 
European Commission’s decision that the UK’s Finance 
Company Partial Exemption rules constituted state aid,  
OECD developments in proposals to tackle the challenges 
arising from the digitalised economy, an internal refinancing  
of the Group’s US operations and updates on global tax 
authority audit activity including Brazil.

The Committee considered an update on Pearson’s tax 
reporting agenda, including ongoing involvement endorsing 
the B-Team Responsible Tax Principles and the publication of 
Pearson’s fourth Annual Tax Report.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information98

Risk governance and control

Control environment
The Board has overall responsibility for Pearson’s systems of internal 
control and risk management, which are designed to manage,  
and where possible mitigate, the risks facing Pearson, safeguard  
assets and provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against 
material financial misstatement or loss. The Board agrees risk 
management requirements and, in assessing the effectiveness of  
the risk management effort, reviews a range of inputs as described 
elsewhere in this report. The Board can and does challenge the 
reporting it receives and will request further information as needed  
to make its assessment. 

The Board confirms that it has conducted and continues throughout 
the year to review the effectiveness of Pearson’s systems of risk 
management and internal control in accordance with provision 29  
of the Code and the FRC Guidance on Risk Management, Internal 
Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting (FRC Guidance). 
The Board confirms these systems operated satisfactorily throughout 
the year and to the date of this report, and no significant failings or 
weaknesses were identified in the review process. 

The Board has delegated responsibility for monitoring the 
effectiveness of the company’s risk management and internal control 
systems to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees a 
risk-based internal audit programme, including periodic audits of the 
risk processes across the organisation. It provides assurance on the 
management of risk (including risk deep dives, as described on p92), 
and receives reports on the efficiency and effectiveness of internal 
controls. You can read more about Pearson’s internal audit function  
on p93. Each business area maintains internal controls and procedures 
appropriate to its structure, business environment and risk 
assessment, while complying with company-wide policies, standards 
and guidelines. These controls and procedures are monitored and 
certified through the Group-wide Controls Centre of Excellence. 

Internal control and risk management
Our internal controls and risk oversight are monitored and continually 
improved to ensure their compliance with FRC Guidance. 

The Board is ultimately accountable for effective risk management in 
Pearson and determines our strategic approach to risk. It confirms our 
organisational risk management framework as well as our risk appetite 
targets. Twice yearly it receives and reviews reports on the status of the 
top Group-wide risks. It is supported in the following ways:

  the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing internal controls 
within Pearson which includes determining the risk appetite 
(recommended by Pearson Executive Management team),  
reviewing and commenting upon key risks, and ensuring that risk 
management is effective

  Pearson’s Executive and leadership teams are responsible for 
identifying and mitigating principal risks

  leaders and managers at all levels in Pearson are responsible for 
managing risk in their area of responsibility, including the 
identification, assessment and treatment of risk

  the Organisational Risk and Resilience team owns the overall risk 
management framework for the company and facilitates 
consolidated reporting on risk

  the internal audit team provides independent assurance on  
the adequacy of the risk management arrangements in place.  
The internal audit plan is aligned to identified Pearson-wide risks  
and it presents issues and risks arising from internal audits at each 
Audit Committee meeting

The involvement of the Board and Audit Committee in the design, 
implementation, identification, monitoring and review of risks 
(including setting risk appetite and reviewing how risk is being 
embedded in our culture) is outlined in more detail in the 
organisational risk management section on p56 

LINES OF DEFENCE

The below diagram shows the  
lines of defence within Pearson:

Audit Committee

Senior Management

1ST LINE OF DEFENCE

2ND LINE OF DEFENCE

3RD LINE OF DEFENCE

Process owner and 
control owner:  
IT and business

Controls Centre  
of Excellence

Second line functions 
including Information 
Security, Data Privacy, 
Compliance

Internal Audit

Ownership, responsibility and accountability for 
directly assessing, controlling and mitigating risks.

E
x
t
e
r
n
a

l

A
u
d
i
t

(

P
w
C

)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
 
99

Financial management and reporting
There is a comprehensive strategic planning, budgeting and 
forecasting system with an annual operating plan approved by the 
Board. Monthly financial information, including trading results, balance 
sheets, cash flow statements, capital expenditures and indebtedness, 
is reported against the corresponding figures for the plan and prior 
years, with corrective action outlined by the appropriate senior 
Executive. Pearson’s senior management meets regularly with 
business area management to review their business and financial 
performance against plan and forecast. Major risks relevant to each 
business area as well as performance against the stated financial  
and strategic objectives are reviewed in these meetings. 

There is an ongoing process to monitor the risks and effectiveness of 
controls in relation to the financial reporting and consolidation process, 
including the related information systems. This includes up-to-date 
Pearson financial policies, formal requirements for finance to certify 
that they have been in compliance with policies and that the control 
environment has been maintained throughout the year, consolidation 
reviews and analysis of material variances, finance technical reviews, 
and review and sign-off by senior finance managers. The Group finance 
function also monitors and assesses these processes and controls 
through finance and technology compliance functions and a Controls 
Steering Committee comprising cross-functional experts. 

These controls include those over external financial reporting  
which are documented and tested in accordance with the applicable 
regulatory requirements, including section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act, which is relevant to our US listing. One key control in this area is the 
Verification Committee, which submits reports to the Audit Committee. 
This Committee is chaired by the Company Secretary, and members 
include the Chief Financial Officer and her deputy, the Deputy  
Chief Legal Officer, Vice President – Internal Audit and Senior Vice 
President – Investor Relations as well as senior members of financial 
management. The primary responsibility of this Committee is to review 
Pearson’s public reporting and disclosures to ensure that information 
provided to shareholders is complete, accurate and compliant with all 
applicable legislation and listing regulations. In addition, our separate 
Market Disclosure Committee is responsible for considering potential 
inside information and its treatment in accordance with the Market 
Abuse Regulation.

The effectiveness of key financial controls is subject to management 
review and self-certification and independent evaluation by the 
external auditors.

Treasury management
The treasury department operates within policies approved by the 
Audit Committee on behalf of the Board, and treasury transactions and 
procedures are subject to regular internal audit. Major transactions are 
authorised outside the department at the requisite level, and there is 
an appropriate segregation of duties. Frequent reports are made to the 
Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Regular 
reports are prepared for the Audit Committee and an annual risk 
review meeting takes place between the Treasurer and Audit 
Committee. The Treasury Policy is described in more detail in  
note 19 to the financial statements on p176 

Insurance
Pearson reviews its risk financing options regularly to determine how 
the company’s insurable risk exposures are managed and protected. 
Pearson annually reviews coverage against insurable risk, insurers  
and premium spend, ensuring the programme is fit for purpose and 
cost-effective. 

Pearson’s insurance subsidiary, Spear Insurance Company Limited,  
is used to leverage Pearson’s risk retention capability and to achieve  
a balance between retaining insurance risk and transferring it to 
external insurers.

Tax
The Board has delegated responsibility for the integrity of financial 
reporting and risk management to the Audit Committee. This includes 
setting tax strategy and monitoring tax risk. The Tax Department 
reports at least annually to the Audit Committee. Regular updates  
are provided to the Deputy CFO and the CFO throughout the year.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information100

Directors’ remuneration report

Committee Chair
Elizabeth Corley 

Members as at  
31 December 2020
Elizabeth Corley, Sherry Coutu,  
Tim Score and Sidney Taurel

Key messages from the Remuneration Committee 

  Despite financial performance in line with revised 
expectations, the 2020 incentive outcomes for Executive 
Directors reflect the unforeseen impact of COVID-19 on 
the business.

  To secure the appointment of our new Chief Executive, 
Andy Bird, the Committee developed a remuneration 
package taking into account the global market in which 
Pearson competes for talent.  

  The Committee reviewed incentive arrangements for our 
senior management below Board level, with the aim of 
strengthening support for the delivery of our strategic 
objectives, while promoting pay for performance and 
aligning incentives across the organisation.

  There will be a 1.5% salary increase for the Chief Financial 
Officer in 2021, in line with the wider UK workforce.  
The salary for the Chief Executive is fixed until 2023.

  The Committee remains focused on ensuring the 
remuneration arrangements in place for the broader 
employee population are consistent with the need to 
attract and retain the right talent for a digital future.

Terms of reference

The Committee’s terms of reference are in line with the 
2018 UK Corporate Governance Code and are available 
on the Governance page of the company’s website at  
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations. 
(A summary of the Committee’s responsibilities is shown 
on p120 

) 

Board Committee attendance 

The following table shows attendance by Directors at 
Committee meetings throughout 2020:

Remuneration Committee 
Attendance 

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Josh Lewis1

Tim Score

Sidney Taurel

Andy Bird2

7/7

7/7

3/3

7/7

7/7

1/3

Josh Lewis retired from the Pearson Board on 24 April 2020.
1 
2  Andy Bird joined the Committee on 1 May 2020. He stepped 

down from this role on 18 October 2020 following his 
appointment as Chief Executive Officer. Andy Bird was not 
present at any Remuneration Committee meeting where  
his remuneration was discussed.

Dear shareholders 
The last year has been one of substantial change. As for many 
companies, the global COVID-19 pandemic presented new and 
unprecedented challenges for Pearson. Additionally, Pearson has  
seen change to our Executive Directors including, after an extensive 
global search in a highly competitive marketplace, the appointment  
our new Chief Executive, Andy Bird, in October 2020.

In what has been a particularly challenging year from an operational 
and financial perspective, Pearson delivered sales and adjusted 
operating profit performance in line with revised expectations,  
with continued growth in online learning.

During 2020, despite the impact of COVID-19, Pearson maintained its 
dividend and did not access government funding or take advantage  
of the furloughing programme.

In line with Pearson’s values, Pearson’s response to COVID-19 focused 
on supporting our employees, customers, partners and broader 
stakeholders during the pandemic. In particular, with regard to our 
employees, protecting their health, safety and wellbeing was a key 
priority. Accelerated by the pandemic, Pearson reviewed and updated 
a number of our workforce policies, to ensure these best support our 
operational needs whilst promoting a healthy work-life balance for our 
employees, including but not limited to flexible working policies and 
extending the global reach of our Employee Assistance Programme.

Recognising the impact of the pandemic on the broader communities 
which we not only work, but also live and learn in, the Chair of the 
Board, the Non-Executive Directors and Executive Directors voluntarily 
took a temporary three-month reduction in salary/fees, which was 
donated to charities to help support these local communities.

In addition, the Committee exercised its discretion when granting the 
2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) award to Executive Directors, 
recognising the recent share price volatility. As a result, a reduced 
number of shares were granted to the Chief Financial Officer, Sally 
Johnson, helping to protect against any windfall gains on vesting.  
No other Executive Director was eligible to participate in the 2020 LTIP.

Appointment of new Chief Executive 
On 24 August 2020, Pearson announced that Andy Bird would be 
appointed as its new Chief Executive and Executive Director from 19 
October 2020. Andy has a rare track record as a proven leader of a 
large, complex and diverse business, and a wealth of experience 
driving digital change in a disrupted consumer content business,  
while creating shareholder value. This positions him very well to build 
on the foundations that have been laid over the last few years and lead 
Pearson as it becomes a digital-first consumer-focused lifelong learning 
company. The Committee looks forward to working with Andy Bird in 
driving the business forward to enhance value for all stakeholders.

In order to secure such an exceptional candidate, the Committee 
developed a one-off bespoke remuneration package for 
recommendation to the Board. In doing so we sought to maintain our 
existing shareholder approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy for 
future years while finding a means to bridge the considerable gap in 
compensation practice between the UK and the US, Andy’s home 
market, where both amounts and structures are quite different.  
The Committee developed a one-off arrangement, the co-investment 
award, to help bridge this gap. This solution was enabled by Andy Bird’s 
decision to invest personally and substantially in Pearson shares.  
The Committee recognises that such a one-off arrangement is not 
typical in the UK market, but believe it was the optimal structure to 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information101

secure Andy Bird’s recruitment whilst incentivising the creation of 
long-term shareholder value and keeping our forward-looking  
policy unchanged.

All other elements of Andy Bird’s remuneration package are in line  
with our approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which is aligned 
with UK market practice and key governance principles.

Whilst within policy, the Committee recognises that this package 
represents an uplift over his predecessor. When setting the package, 
the Committee considered, as is typical practice, Andy Bird’s proven 
skills and experience, the remuneration he received in his prior role 
and compensation levels for Chief Executive roles at comparable 
companies (including both FTSE-listed companies and global sector 
comparators). After careful evaluation, the Committee determined  
that such a package was appropriate, balancing these various 
reference points. While the Committee was mindful of internal 
relativities, it believed that securing such an exceptional candidate  
as Andy Bird was fundamental to Pearson’s future success.

  Andy Bird will receive a salary of $1,250,000 per annum, which is fixed 
until at least 2023

  His pension contribution is set at 16% of base salary, our new hire  
rate for Executive Directors as set out in our approved policy, and is 
aligned with the pension provision that UK employees of a similar age 
are eligible to receive

  He will be eligible to participate in both the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) 
and LTIP from 2021. The maximum AIP opportunity will be 200% of 
base salary and the LTIP award will have a maximum face value of 
300% of base salary 

  Pearson will also provide a contribution towards accommodation 
costs in New York so that Andy has a base close to Pearson’s 
operations on the East Coast

Further information on these arrangements can be found on p110 

Participation in the co-investment arrangement required Andy Bird  
to purchase and hold Pearson shares at an aggregate cost to him of 
300% of base salary ($3.75 million), demonstrating his commitment to 
his role, creating immediate alignment with shareholders and fulfilling 
from the outset our shareholding guideline.

In consideration for this investment, Andy was granted a co-investment 
award equal to 750% of base salary, which will vest in three equal 
tranches as soon as practicable following 31 December 2021, 
31 December 2022 and 31 December 2023. Vesting is subject to 
performance underpins, to ensure the Committee can reduce vesting 
if in its opinion performance of the business or the individual does 
not support this, and continued employment. Shares that vest will 
be subject to a holding period until 31 December 2023. Further 
information on the co-investment award, can be found on p111 

Shareholder engagement
The co-investment award was not envisaged within our approved 
Directors’ Remuneration Policy, and therefore, prior to Andy’s 
appointment, we sought shareholder approval. In advance of this,  
and in developing the remuneration package, the Committee engaged 
extensively with shareholders. The Board very much appreciated the 
support received by the majority of shareholders for the resolution at 
our General Meeting in September 2020, although we noted that a 
significant minority voted against the proposals.

In light of this outcome, given the Committee’s commitment to an 
ongoing and transparent dialogue with our shareholders, we 
undertook an engagement exercise in early 2021 in order to listen and 
further understand the views and perspectives of our shareholders.

Shareholders remained supportive of Andy Bird’s appointment, 
recognising the one-off nature of the co-investment award as a bridge 
between UK and US practice, appreciated our determination to keep 
our approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy otherwise unchanged, 
and noted that there had been no buy-out of remuneration forgone at 
a previous employer. 

The two main areas of concern raised by investors related to the  
time horizon over which the co-investment award is required to  
be held, specifically that this is a shorter time horizon than the  
five years specified in the UK Corporate Governance Code; and the 
performance underpins.

In terms of the time horizon, the co-investment arrangement is 
structured to incentivise the transformation of the business and 
growth in the near-term. The Committee therefore considered it 
appropriate that the phased vesting schedule and holding period to 
three years reflect the period over which we expect Andy Bird to 
deliver, as well as the fact that he has invested a significant amount  
of his own funds into Pearson shares. Further, under our Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy, he is required to build a shareholding equal to 
the value of 300% of salary. This must be maintained for a period of 
two years post-employment. This ensures continued alignment to 
shareholder interests and incentivises the delivery of long-term 
sustainable value. 

On the performance underpins, during the second half of 2020,  
the Committee spent time considering how these will be assessed.  
In addition to consideration of the specific underpins, it is the 
Committee’s intention that, prior to the vesting of each tranche of the 
co-investment award, a holistic review of performance is undertaken, 
including consideration of the experience of all stakeholders, such as 
learners, employees, customers and shareholders, as well as the 
effectiveness of risk management and internal controls. Further  
details on this assessment process can be found on p112 

I would personally like to thank all those who engaged with us  
during this process. The support of our shareholders enabled  
Pearson to appoint a new Chief Executive who we believe will unlock 
new growth potential for the company and ultimately return value to 
all our stakeholders.

Summary of other leadership changes 
John Fallon stepped down from the role of Chief Executive on  
18 October 2020. He remained employed by Pearson until 
31 December 2020, acting as an adviser and facilitating a smooth 
transition. There was no payment for loss of office and, in respect  
of his outstanding AIP and LTIP awards, the Committee determined 
that John would be treated as a ‘good leaver’. Further details of 
remuneration arrangements in respect of John’s retirement can  
be found on p116 

During the year, Pearson also saw a change in its Chief Financial Officer. 
On 24 April 2020, Sally Johnson was appointed to the role of Chief 
Financial Officer and Executive Director, replacing Coram Williams.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationLooking forward to 2021 – senior management
Following Andy’s appointment, the Committee reviewed the structure 
of incentives for 2021 for senior management below Board level, 
including the broader Pearson Executive team, with the aim of creating 
incentives that better support the delivery of Pearson’s corporate 
objectives while strengthening the link between pay and performance. 
As a result, the previous single incentive plan operated for this 
population will be replaced with a more typical annual bonus plus 
long-term incentive structure. The long-term incentive will comprise 
both performance shares and restricted shares, recognising the 
markets in which we compete for talent. Overall, the Committee 
considers that this change in incentive structure promotes and 
encourages pay for performance whilst providing greater alignment 
with our approach to pay across Pearson.

Looking forward to 2021 – Executive Directors 
The Committee reviewed the salary of Sally Johnson and approved 
an increase of 1.5% for 2021. This is in line with the salary increase 
awarded to the wider workforce in the UK. Andy Bird’s salary remains 
fixed until 2023.

The AIP for 2021 will continue to be based on a balanced mix of 
financial and strategic measures, in line with prior years. For the 2021 
LTIP, at the time of writing, the Committee had not yet finalised setting 
performance targets but these will be provided on our website prior  
to the AGM. When setting targets, the Committee follows a robust 
process, taking into account Pearson’s strategic plan, as well as  
external expectations. Targets set will be stretching in this context.

The Committee continues to engage in conversations with 
shareholders. The conversations that we have had over the last year 
have been invaluable and we thank shareholders for the time they 
have spent with us. We look forward to receiving your support at the 
AGM in relation to our remuneration report.

Elizabeth Corley  
Chair of Remuneration Committee

15 March 2021

102

Directors’ remuneration report

Sally’s remuneration arrangements, which are in line with our 
Directors’ Remuneration Policy, were disclosed in last year’s Directors’ 
Remuneration Report and further details are provided on p113.  
Coram Williams received no payment for loss of office. He was not 
eligible for an AIP or LTIP in respect of 2020 and he forfeited any 
unvested LTIP awards on departure.

In line with its Terms of Reference, the Committee has also approved 
remuneration arrangements for a number of new appointments to  
the Pearson Executive team.

Executive remuneration framework and alignment 
to strategy
The Committee was pleased to receive the support of 95% of our 
shareholders for our Directors’ Remuneration Policy at the 2020 AGM. 
Our Directors’ Remuneration Policy is intended to support Pearson in 
achieving its purpose while driving long-term sustainable value for 
shareholders. It also reflects the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code and evolving market practice.

Following his appointment, Andy has reviewed and revised our 
forward-looking strategy. While the Committee continues to believe 
the current Directors’ Remuneration Policy and its implementation 
appropriately incentivises the delivery of the new strategy, it will keep 
this under review over the coming year, engaging with shareholders  
on key areas of focus.

Pearson has a clear purpose – to help people make progress in their 
lives through learning. Our strategy and priorities are anchored around 
this purpose, which is embedded in the actions and behaviours of  
our leaders. In that context, a focus on building an inclusive culture, 
increasing diverse representation within our workforce, accelerating 
our sustainability strategy and investing in our own people’s  
learning are all key strategic priorities. Therefore, for 2021, we have 
incorporated clear metrics in relation to these priorities within our  
AIP framework, further strengthening the relationship between  
our purpose and our executive remuneration arrangements.  
The Committee will keep this approach, including the weighting of 
these metrics, under review.

Incentive outcomes for 2020
As noted, sales and adjusted operating profit performance were  
in line with revised expectations but performance during 2020 was 
significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This is reflected in 
incentive outcomes for Executive Directors, targets for which were set 
at the start of the financial year.

Only John Fallon and Sally Johnson were eligible to participate in the AIP 
in respect of financial year 2020. Despite the strategic progress made 
during the year, Pearson did not meet the financial targets, which were 
set prior to the onset of COVID-19. As a result, there will be no payment 
under the AIP to Executive Directors.

Annual incentive awards will however be made to the wider employee 
population recognising their contribution during the year.

The LTIP award granted in 2018 is due to vest this year based on 
performance to 31 December 2020 against stretching earnings per 
share (EPS), return on invested capital (ROIC) and relative total 
shareholder returns (TSR) targets. Performance targets were not met 
in respect of this award and therefore this award will lapse in full.

The Remuneration Committee did not exercise any discretion in 
respect of these outcomes. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information103

Executive remuneration framework and implementation for 2021 

Pearson has a set of remuneration principles that govern pay for the whole organisation. Remuneration arrangements for our Executive Directors 
have been developed with these principles in mind.

Remuneration principles that apply across the whole organisation

1

Aligned to 
longer-term 
strategy

Reward will  
be linked to 
achieving 
Pearson’s 
longer-term 
strategy, growth 
and sustainability

2

Pay for 
performance

3

Market 
competitive

4

Targeted 
differentiation

5

Tailored

Remuneration 
framework and 
outcomes are 
aligned with 
performance

Pay levels  
will be market 
competitive, based 
on role, grade and 
contribution to 
ensure individuals 
are fairly rewarded 
in line with the 
market

There will be 
targeted 
differentiation of 
reward across our 
employees linked 
to talent and 
performance 
management

The approach to 
reward may be 
tailored in certain 
circumstances to 
address a specific 
market/business 
need but will be 
designed in a  
way that is 
consistent with  
our underlying 
reward philosophy

6

One part of the 
employee value 
proposition

Remuneration is 
one part of our 
broader employee 
value proposition 
and not the only 
reason to work  
for Pearson

Our Directors’ Remuneration Policy and its implementation supports 
our purpose of helping people make progress in their lives through 
learning, our strategy and ultimately the delivery of long-term 
sustainable value for all stakeholders, including our shareholders. 

In developing the forward-looking Directors’ Remuneration Policy,  
the Committee had due regard to the UK Corporate Governance Code, 
wider workforce remuneration and emerging best practice in relation 
to Executive Director remuneration.

  Pearson’s remuneration principles, as set out above, were developed 
to ensure alignment to company culture and position Pearson as  
an employer of choice, with an ability to attract and retain the right 
talent to support the company’s digital future, whilst recognising that 
remuneration is one part of the broader employee value proposition 
at Pearson. 

  Our ongoing executive remuneration framework is designed  
to be simple, with total remuneration made up of fixed  
and performance- linked elements supporting different  
strategic objectives

  Our remuneration framework and outcomes are designed to be 
aligned with performance achieved:

   –  Performance measures selected for the AIP and LTIP are key to 

achieving strategic objectives. The Committee reviews performance 
measures on an annual basis to ensure they continue to incentivise 
the right management behaviours and goals

   –  We carry out a robust target-setting process each year, taking into 
account Pearson’s strategic plan, as well as analyst consensus to 
reflect market expectations, resulting in stretching yet achievable 
targets for the AIP and LTIP

   –  Maximum awards under the AIP and LTIP are capped and clearly 

disclosed in our Policy

   –  When determining payouts, the Committee discusses if the 

outcome is reflective of overall company performance and the 
experience of stakeholders, including shareholders and employees, 
over the period and, if not, has discretion to adjust outcomes.

  The Committee is mindful of reputational and other risks when 
implementing the forward-looking Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
and determining outcomes for Executive Directors and senior 
management. The company also has safeguards in place, such as 
malus and clawback provisions and a two-year holding period on  
the LTIP, as well as robust shareholding guidelines which extend 
post-employment and were further strengthened last year

  Before signing off the annual remuneration report, the Committee 
reviews drafts and provides input to clarify our disclosures.  
Where material changes are proposed to the operation of our 
Directors’ Remuneration Policy, we would normally consult with  
key shareholders to ensure the rationale for such changes is fully 
understood and provide the opportunity for shareholders to feed 
into the decision-making process and inform our final conclusions

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information104

Executive remuneration framework and implementation for 2021 

Summary of our forward-looking Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
The table below provides a summary of our forward-looking Directors’ Remuneration Policy and its implementation for 2021. This does not 
include the co-investment award granted to Andy Bird on his appointment as this was a one-off arrangement and does not form part of our 
forward-looking executive remuneration framework. The full Directors’ Remuneration Policy is available on the Governance page of the 
company’s website at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/company/business-operations.

B Base salary

Key features

  Base salaries are set to provide the appropriate rate of 
remuneration for the job, taking into account relevant recruitment 
markets, business sectors and geographic regions 

  Base salaries are normally reviewed annually, with any increases 
normally in line with typical increases awarded to other employees 
in the Group

  Salary reviews take into account: general economic and market 
conditions; the level of increases made across the company  
as a whole; particular circumstances such as changes in role, 
responsibilities or organisation; the remuneration and level  
of increases for executives in similar positions in comparable 
companies in both the UK, US and internationally;  
and individual performance

2021 implementation 

  Andy Bird – $1,250,000 (no change)

  Sally Johnson – £522,725 (1.5% increase)

Andy Bird’s first salary review will occur in 2023. 

When reviewing Sally Johnson’s base salary, the Committee took  
into account the level of increases made across the company as a 
whole, business and individual performance, and general economic 
and market conditions. The increase awarded to Ms Johnson is in line 
with the general increase across the UK.

A&B Allowances and benefits

Key features

2021 implementation 

  Allowances and benefits which reflect the local competitive market 
and may include travel-related benefits, health-related benefits,  
risk benefits and any other benefits provided to the majority of 
employees. The Committee may introduce other benefits if it is 
considered appropriate to do so

  The cost of the provision of allowances and benefits varies from 
year to year depending on cost to Pearson

R Retirement benefits

No changes for 2021. Executive Directors will continue to receive 
travel, health and risk-related benefits. Andy Bird will also receive a 
contribution towards accommodation costs.

Key features

2021 implementation 

  Employees in the UK, including Executive Directors, are eligible  
to join the Money Purchase 2003 section of the Pearson Pension 
Plan. Executive Directors are eligible to join this plan or receive a 
cash allowance of equivalent value

  The Committee has discretion to put in place retirement benefit 
arrangements in line with local market practice. The Committee 
may also honour all pre-existing retirement benefit obligations, 
commitments or other entitlements that were entered into by a 
member of the Pearson Group before that person became a 
Director, such as participation in the Final Pay section of the  
Pearson Pension Plan

  Executive Directors, who opt out of the pension, can receive a cash 
allowance of up to 16% of base salary, in line with the maximum 
company contribution as a percentage of salary that UK employees 
of a similar age are eligible to receive

Sally Johnson is an existing member of the Final Pay section of  
the Pearson Pension Plan. Her pension accrual rate is 1/60th of 
pensionable salary per annum, restricted to the Plan earnings cap.

Andy Bird is not a member of a pension scheme operated by Pearson. 
Instead, he receives a payment of 16% of base salary in lieu of 
pension. This is in line our new hire rate for Executive Directors,  
as set out in our approved policy, and is aligned with the pension 
provision that UK employees of a similar age are eligible to receive.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information105

AIP Annual incentive plan

Key features

  Motivates towards the achievement of annual business goals and 
strategic objectives and provides a focus on key financial and 
non-financial metrics, with financial metrics accounting for at  
least 75% of the total annual opportunity

  The Committee sets performance measures and their relative 
weightings annually to ensure continuing alignment with strategy 
and that targets are sufficiently stretching

  The Committee has discretion to adjust payments if it believes  
that the formulaic outcome does not reflect underlying financial  
or non-financial performance or if such other exceptional factors 
warrant doing so

2021 implementation 

Maximum opportunity for 2021:

  200% of base salary for the Chief Executive

  170% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer

50% of the maximum opportunity payable for on-target levels  
of performance.

For 2021, the following balanced mix of financial and strategic 
measures will be used, which is unchanged from the previous year:

Adjusted operating profit Sales

Operating cash flow Strategic measures

30%

30%

20%

20%

  Malus and clawback provisions apply

Strategic measures for 2021 will focus on:

  Making Pearson fit for the future and investing in our talent

  Digital growth, consumer engagement and product effectiveness

  Building an inclusive culture, increasing diverse representation and 
accelerating our sustainability strategy

As in previous years, a financial underpin will apply in respect of the 
strategic measures. Targets will be disclosed in full retrospectively 
following the end of the performance period.

2021 implementation 

Maximum opportunity for 2021:

  300% of base salary for the Chief Executive

  245% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer

Performance will be measured over three years, with any shares 
vesting subject to an additional two-year holding period. 

Given the recent announcement of the company’s refreshed  
strategy, at the time of writing, the Committee had not yet finalised 
performance targets for the 2021 LTIP grant. The targets will be  
made available on the website before the AGM and will be disclosed 
in the Regulatory News Service (RNS) announcement at the time of 
grant, which is expected to be in May as normal. The Committee 
remains committed to timely disclosure of targets once they have 
been confirmed. 

2021 implementation

No changes for 2021.

LTIP Long-Term Incentive Plan

Key Features

  Drive long-term profitability, share price growth and value creation 
whilst aligning the interests of Executives and shareholders

  Awards are made annually, and vest on a sliding scale based on 
performance against stretching corporate performance targets 
measured at the end of the three-year performance period

  Awards are subject to a post-vesting holding period of two years 
following the end of the performance period

  The Committee is guided by the principle of aligning shareholder 
and management interests and therefore reserves the right to 
adjust pay-outs before they are released if it believes that the 
vesting outcome does not reflect underlying performance or  
if other exceptional factors warrant doing so

  Malus and clawback provisions apply

SG Shareholding guidelines

Key Features

  Align the interests of Executives and shareholders and encourage 
long-term shareholding and commitment to the company

  Executive Directors are expected to build up a substantial shareholding 
in the company within five years from their date of appointment to the 
Board. The current requirement is 300% of salary for the Chief 
Executive and 200% of salary for other Executive Directors

  Executive Directors are expected to retain their shareholding 
guideline (or actual holding if lower) for two years following  
stepping down as an Executive Director

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information106

Executive remuneration framework and implementation for 2021

CNF Chair and NED Fees

Key Features

  To attract and retain high-calibre individuals, with appropriate or 
industry-relevant skills, by offering market competitive fee levels

  The Chair is paid a single fee for all responsibilities

  The Non-Executive Directors are paid a basic fee, with Committee 
Chairs, members of the main Board Committees and the Senior 
Independent Director paid an additional fee to reflect their  
extra responsibilities

  The Chair and Non-Executive Directors receive no other pay or 
benefits, except for reimbursement of expenses, and do not 
participate in incentive plans

  A minimum of 25% of the Chair’s and Non-Executive Directors’  
basic fee are paid in shares

2021 implementation

No changes for 2021.

Role

Chair of the Board

Base fee for Non-Executive Directors

Senior Independent Director fee

Role

Audit Committee

Remuneration Committee

Nomination & Governance Committee

Reputation & Responsibility Committee

Fees for 2021

£500,000

£70,000

£22,000

Chair

Member

£27,500

£15,000

£22,000

£10,000

£15,000

£15,000

£8,000

£8,000

Workforce remuneration at Pearson

The Committee takes its responsibilities concerning the oversight  
of remuneration, policies and practice for the wider organisation 
seriously. Our remuneration principles are consistent across the 
employee population but how they are applied varies by business 
need, level and geography as required. The key difference in executive 
remuneration compared to the approach to remuneration across the 
workforce is that remuneration for our Executive Directors is more 
heavily weighted towards variable pay and linked to the delivery of  
our strategic objectives. 

Our approach to remuneration across the wider organisation is  
as follows: 

  Base salary – Set taking into account economic factors, competitive 
market rates, roles, skills, experience and individual performance 

  Allowances and benefits – Reflect the local labour market in which 
they are based. All eligible employees (including Executive Directors) 
are also eligible to participate in savings-related share acquisition 
programmes in the UK, US and the rest of the world, which are not 
subject to any performance conditions

  Retirement benefits – Reflect local market practice. Pearson 
employees in the UK may participate in the same underlying  
pension arrangements as the Executive Directors, subject to  
certain age bands and legacy arrangements

  Annual incentives – Around 11,000 employees participate in an 
Annual Incentive Plan, which is funded based on similar performance 
measures as those used for the Executive Directors. A number of 
other employees participate in alternative forms of cash-based 
annual bonus such as sales incentive and commission plans based  
on performance targets and profit-shares where required for 
legislative reasons

  Long-term incentives – From 2021, senior management will 
participate in a new long-term incentive arrangement, which 
comprises both performance shares and restricted shares, 
recognising the markets in which Pearson competes for talent.  
This replaces the single incentive plan previously operated for this 
population. Below this senior management level, approximately 6% 
of employees – selected on the basis of their role, performance and 
potential – participate in share incentive schemes 

During the year, the Committee received reports from the  
Chief Executive and Chief Human Resources Officer on pay and 
conditions across the company as a whole, and on the recruitment  
and retention experience. This includes any relevant feedback or 
insights received from employees through the Employee Engagement 
Network, which was established in 2019 and is attended periodically  
by the Chief Executive and Chief Human Resources Officer. In addition, 
any feedback received from employees through the employee 
engagement survey, which captures views on pay and benefits,  
helps inform Committee decisions. The Committee continues to 
develop the ways in which it engages with the wider organisation  
on executive remuneration.

The Committee also considers the company’s gender pay gap for  
Great Britain. This year, the Committee was pleased to see that further 
progress was made on narrowing the gender pay gap, although noted 
that there was still more work to be done. In this regard, Pearson has a 
robust action plan and continues to drive investment towards the 
hiring, retention and development of women, as well as other diverse 
talent groups. Further details, including on the actions being taken to 
address the gap across our organisation, can be found within our 
gender pay gap report. Pearson is committed to promoting diversity, 
equity and inclusion globally, and during 2021 plans to extend our 
gender pay gap reporting to other countries in which we operate.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information107

Remuneration report for 2020

Certain parts of this report have been audited as required by the  
Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and 
Reports) Regulations 2008 as amended. Those tables which have  
been subject to audit are marked with an asterisk.

Single total figure of remuneration and  
prior year comparison*
Total aggregate emoluments for Executive and Non-Executive 
Directors were £3,215m in 2020. These emoluments are included 
within the total employee benefit expense in note 5 to the financial 
statements (p159 

)

Executive Directors

The remuneration received by Executive Directors in respect of the 
financial years ended 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019 is set 
out below.

Executive Director ‘single figure’ remuneration

Andy Bird was appointed as Chief Executive and an Executive Director 
on 19 October 2020. The table below reflects remuneration received by 
Andy Bird in respect of his role as Executive Director. Remuneration 
received by him in respect of his Non-Executive Director role prior to 
his appointment as Chief Executive is included in the table on p116 

John Fallon stepped down as Chief Executive and as a Board Director 
on 18 October 2020. 

Sally Johnson was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Executive 
Director on 24 April 2020.

Coram Williams stepped down as Chief Financial Officer and as a Board 
Director on 24 April 2020. 

In respect of each of these individuals, the table below reflects 
remuneration received while an Executive Director of the company.

Element of remuneration 000s

2020

2019

2020

2019

Andy Bird 
$000s

John Fallon 
£000s

2020

353

9

45

407

–

–

–

Sally Johnson 
£000s

2019

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Coram Williams 
£000s

2020

172

12

1

185

–

–

–

2019

537

8

62

607

–

–

–

185

607

653

24

178

855

–

–

–

813

30

211

1,054

–

562

562

855

1,616

407

Travel benefits comprise car allowance, shared use of a company  
car and driver for business purposes (for John Fallon only), and 
reimbursements of a taxable nature resulting from business travel and 
engagements. Health benefits comprise healthcare, health assessment 
and gym subsidy. Accommodation benefits for Andy Bird relate to the 
contribution towards the rental costs of an apartment in New York to 
be used for business purposes. Other benefits received relate to fees 
for professional services and subscriptions. For Andy Bird these are in 
connection with his appointment as Chief Executive.

In addition to the allowances and benefits set out, Executive Directors 
may also participate in company benefit or policy arrangements that 
have no taxable value and/or are available to all other employees in the 
same location.

B

Base salary

A&B Allowances and benefits

R

Retirement benefits

Total fixed pay

AIP Annual incentives

LTIP

Long-term incentives

Total variable pay

Total remuneration

Notes to single figure table* 

B Base salary

260

125

42

427

–

–

–

427

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

The base salary shown in the single figure table reflects salary paid  
in the financial year while an Executive Director of the company.  
Andy Bird is paid in US dollars, while other Executive Directors are  
paid in pound sterling.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, John Fallon and Sally Johnson 
voluntarily took a temporary salary reduction of 25% and 20%, 
respectively, for the three-month period May to July. This was donated 
to charities engaged in COVID-19-related activities. The single figure 
table includes their salaries before this charitable donation. 

A&B Allowances and benefits 

The breakdown of benefits is as follows for 2020:

Travel

Health

Accommodation 

Other

Andy  
Bird
$000

John  
Fallon
£000

Sally  
Johnson
£000

Coram 
Williams
£000

–

4

60

61

16

2

–

6

9

–

–

–

–

1

–

11

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information108

Remuneration report for 2020

R Retirement benefits

LTIP Long-term incentives 

Further detail on retirement benefits is set out later in this report  
on p113 

AIP Annual incentives

The 2020 AIP for the Executive Directors was based on a mix of 
financial (80% weighting) and strategic measures (20% weighting).  
The 2020 AIP resulted in a nil payout for both John Fallon and  
Sally Johnson. For more detail on performance metrics and 
performance against targets in 2020, see below.

Andy Bird and Coram Williams were not eligible to participate in  
the 2020 AIP.

The 2018 LTIP award was subject to performance conditions assessed 
to 31 December 2020. Performance targets were not met and 
therefore the award will lapse in full. For further details see p110 

The single figure of remuneration for 2019 includes the vesting of the 
2017 LTIP award. The value of the award has been updated to reflect 
the dividends accrued and the share price on the date of vesting  
(1 May 2020) of 455.5p.

The value of the 2017 award previously disclosed in the 2019 
Remuneration Report was estimated to be £803,000 for John Fallon 
based on a three-month average share price of 671.0p and did not 
reflect any dividends accrued on those shares.

The 2017 LTIP award which vested on 1 May 2020 was granted on  
11 September 2017 when the share price was 586.0p. Between  
the date of grant and the vesting date, the share price had decreased  
to 455.5p. No element of the 2017 LTIP value disclosed in the  
single figure is therefore attributable to share price growth.  
The Remuneration Committee did not exercise discretion in  
respect of this share price movement.

AIP

  Executive Directors’ annual incentive payments for 2020* 

John Fallon and Sally Johnson were eligible to participate in the 2020 AIP. The following table summarises the performance targets and 
performance against these targets for the 2020 award which resulted in a nil payout. 

Overall outcome

Performance measure

Adjusted operating profit

Sales

Operating cash flow

Strategic measures

Note 1: The outcomes under all measures have been reviewed by internal audit.

Performance range

% of total

Threshold

Target

Max

Actual results

£445m

£482m

£539m

£313m

£3,734m

£3,785m

£3,851m

£3,397m

£398m

£429m

£492m

£315m

See opposite

30%

30%

20%

20%

100%

Payout

% of max 
bonus 
opportunity

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information109

Performance against strategic measures

The targets (and outcomes) for performance against each of the strategic measures are shown in the table below. 

Whilst material progress was made against all strategic goals in the year despite the impact of COVID-19, the financial underpin, which was set in 
line with the operating profit threshold for 2020, was not met. Therefore, there is no payout under the strategic measures for 2020.

Strategic priority Measure

% of total 
funding

Threshold

Target

Max.

Outcome

Growth in digital and 
digitally- enabled sales

Accelerate  
the digital 
transformation 
of the company 

5%

+1% on prior year 

+3% on prior year 

+5% on prior year 

Digital platforms –  
delivery of three  
2020 milestones on  
digital roadmap

5%

Delivery of  
one milestone

Delivery of  
two milestones

Delivery of all  
three milestones

Make the most 
of Pearson’s 
world of talent

Implement a learning 
culture to support  
upskilling of workforce

5%

Conduct Learning 
Survey across the 
company and build 
out learning strategy

Further refinement 
of learning strategy, 
including 
implementation  
of learning culture 
initiatives for 2020

Pilot of learning 
strategy in one part 
of the business

Create a 
simpler 
organisation

Continue roll-out of  
The Enabling Programme 
and implement Business 
Value Realisation plan

5%

Development of 
roadmap for  
Rest of World (RoW) 
and completed 
Business Value 
Realisation plan

One RoW territory 
tested and ready  
to implement plus 
completed plan  
for optimisation 

TEP implemented 
within at least one 
RoW territory and 
demonstrable cost 
savings from 
optimisation

  Whilst the company 
benefitted from a material 
shift to fully digital services 
with sales up 10%, this was 
also offset by the impact of 
COVID-19 on digitally-enabled 
businesses, such as VUE test 
centres, which declined 16% 
resulting in a net reduction of 
2% for the year. 

  The second phase of  
Revel was successfully 
launched in October 2020 
with good progress also made 
against a number of other 
milestones including in 
relation to Employability  
pilot (UK Learns) 

  The digital roadmap is on 
track with the launch of 
additional Revel titles and 
c.250 new eText titles on  
the PLP.

  Specific learning questions 
were integrated into all 
employee pulse surveys 
alongside the creation of  
five-year vision and strategy 
for learning. This culminated 
in the delivery of the first 
‘Global Learning at Work’ 
week and progress on new 
initiatives to support a 
learning culture and 
employee learning. One of 
these was the development  
of a ‘Pearson Capabilities 
Framework’, linked to skills, 
which was piloted as part of 
talent review process.

  TEP successfully went live  
in Asia in November 2020

  The Business Value 
Realisation programme is 
now closed and optimisation 
activity is fully underway 
despite disruption due  
to COVID-19.

Note: If an element of judgement was required to assess achievements that were not completely quantifiable, Internal Audit provided an independent assessment to  
the Committee.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information110

Remuneration report for 2020

LTIP Executive Directors’ Long-Term Incentive Plan award vesting for 2020*
In May 2018, John Fallon and Coram Williams were made awards under the 2018 LTIP. These awards were based on performance the  
business delivered over the three-year period from 2018 to 2020. On leaving the Company, Coram Williams forfeited all unvested LTIP awards, 
including this award. 

The LTIP award made to John Fallon would have vested on the normal vesting date, pro-rated for time to reflect John’s departure prior to the 
normal vesting date, but the applicable performance targets have not been not met and therefore his award, together with awards for other 
participants, will lapse in full.

The targets and performance against these targets are as follows:

Performance 
measure

Adjusted EPS

ROIC

Relative TSR

% of total

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Payout at 
threshold

Payout at 
target

Payout at 
maximum

Actual

% 
achievement

% of total 
award

Performance range

Vesting

A third 

A third

A third

65p

5.0%

Median 

68p

6.0%

N/A

80p

8.0%

Upper 
Quartile

15%

15%

25%

65%

65%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

28.7p

2.9%

Below 
median 
(Ranked 51 
out of 94)

100%

Total

0%

Relative TSR was measured against the constituents of the FTSE 100 at the start of the performance period. Overall, the Committee considers that 
the Remuneration Policy has operated as it intended during 2020.

Appointment of Chief Executive Officer
In October 2020, Andy Bird was appointed as Chief Executive after a very thorough recruitment process. In order to secure Andy Bird’s 
appointment, the Committee developed a remuneration package mindful of practice in Andy Bird’s home market – the US – where pay  
rates are substantially higher than in the UK and the way pay is structured is often very different. The Committee believe that such a package  
was an essential bridge between practices in order to secure an exceptional candidate who will lead Pearson through the next phase of its 
strategic development.

Going forward remuneration arrangements 

With the exception of the co-investment award, a one-off arrangement to support his recruitment, Andy Bird’s remuneration arrangements  
were set in line with our approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which is aligned to UK market practice and key governance principles. Whilst 
within policy, the Committee recognises that this package represents an uplift over his predecessor. When setting the package, the Committee 
considered, as is typical practice, Andy Bird’s proven skills and experience, the remuneration he received in his prior role and compensation  
levels for Chief Executive roles at comparable companies (including both FTSE-listed companies and global sector comparators). After careful 
evaluation, the Committee determined that such a package was appropriate, balancing these various reference points. While the Committee was 
mindful of internal relativities, it believed that securing such an exceptional candidate as Andy Bird was fundamental to Pearson’s future success.

Remuneration Element  Amount 

Commentary 

Base salary 

$1,250,000

Andy’s first salary review will be in 2023. His base salary will be fixed at $1,250,000 until then.

Retirement  
benefits

16% of salary 

Andy receives an annual cash allowance of 16% of base salary in lieu of pension. This is the cash allowance 
available to new hire Executive Directors under our shareholder approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy  
and aligns to the maximum company contribution that UK employees of a similar age are eligible to receive.

Annual Incentive  
Plan Participation 

Long-Term Incentive 
Plan Participation 

Benefits

Maximum annual 
opportunity of  
200% base salary 

Maximum annual 
opportunity of  
300% base salary 

In accordance  
with the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy

Shareholding 
requirements 

In accordance  
with the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy

Andy will be eligible to participate in Pearson’s Annual Incentive Plan from 1 January 2021. He will have a 
maximum opportunity of 200% of base salary and a target bonus equal to 50% of the maximum opportunity. 

From 2021, Andy will be eligible to participate in the Pearson Long-Term Incentive Plan with a maximum annual 
face value of 300% of base salary.

Andy receives benefits in line with our Directors’ Remuneration Policy, including travel-related benefits, private 
healthcare and risk-related benefits. In addition, the Company makes a contribution towards the rental costs of 
an apartment in New York to be used for business purposes, the cost of which will be capped at of $240,000 per 
year ($20,000 per month) prior to any taxes which may be due. The Committee considers it critical for Andy to 
have a base in New York so that he can be close to Pearson operations on the East Coast, while also facilitating 
easier travel to our London headquarters.

Andy will be required to hold Pearson shares with a market value of 300% of base salary, this requirement will 
extend for two years post-employment. As at 31 December 2020, Andy had met his shareholding requirement.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information111

Co-investment award*
As set out in the Chair’s letter, in order to secure Andy Bird as our Chief Executive the Committee designed a one-off co-investment award.  
While recognising that such an award was not typical in the UK market, the Committee believes that this was the optimal structure to secure  
Andy Bird’s recruitment whilst incentivising the creation of long-term shareholder value. 

In order to grant the co-investment award, which was not envisaged in the Directors’ Remuneration Policy approved by shareholders at the  
AGM held on 24 April 2020, the Company sought shareholder approval of a resolution to amend the Directors’ Remuneration Policy on  
18 September 2020. This resolution received support from 67% of shareholders. Given the unusual nature of the co-investment award in  
the UK market, the Board very much appreciated the support received by the majority of shareholders, although noted that a significant  
minority voted against the proposals. Pearson engaged extensively with shareholders during Andy’s appointment process, and in light of the 
General Meeting outcome, the Committee undertook a further engagement exercise to listen to and understand the views and perspectives  
of our shareholders, as described in the Chair’s letter. 

The key features of the award are detailed below. 

Director

Andy Bird 

Date of award

Vesting date

Number of shares

Face value 

Face value (% of 
base salary)1

9 December 2020

See below

1,208,861

$9,375,000

750%

1  Face value was determined using a share price of 590.2p (five-day average to 24 August 2020) and a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.314 (five-day average to 24 August 2020).

The grant of the co-investment award was conditional on  
Andy purchasing Pearson shares equal to 300% of base salary  
by 31 December 2020 (being a total value of $3.75m), which he  
must continue to hold throughout the period to 31 December 2023. 
This personal investment by Andy demonstrates his commitment to 
the role and creates immediate alignment with shareholders.

The co-investment award will vest in three equal tranches as soon  
as practicable following 31 December 2021, 31 December 2022  
and 31 December 2023 respectively and will be subject to performance 
underpins and Andy’s continued employment as at each vesting  
date. Shares that vest will be subject to a holding period until  
31 December 2023.

The co-investment award was designed taking into account  
Andy’s home market – the US – where the structure of pay is often  
very different to the UK and aims to incentivise the transformation of 
the business and growth in the near-term. It was therefore considered 
appropriate that the phased vesting schedule and holding period to 
December 2023 reflect the period over which it is expected value will 
be delivered to our shareholders.

The vesting of the co-investment award is subject to the achievement 
of performance underpins to ensure the Committee can reduce 
vesting if in its opinion the performance of the business or the 
individual does not support this. These underpins are intended to 
prevent payment for failure.

The vesting of each tranche of the award will be subject to the following 
performance underpins:

  an appropriate level of progress being made in relation to delivering 
our strategy including our ongoing transition from print to digital

  no significant ESG issues related to Andy’s tenure occurring which 
result in significant reputational damage 

In addition, the vesting of the final tranche of the award will also be 
subject to the following TSR underpin: 

  the company’s TSR from the date of the announcement of  
Andy’s appointment to 31 December 2023 is either (1) positive;  
or (2) is at median or above when compared to the performance  
of the FTSE 100

If one or more of the underpins are not achieved, then the Committee 
would consider whether, and to what extent, a discretionary reduction 
in the number of shares vesting was required.

In considering whether any adjustment was required in relation to the 
underpins on progress against strategy and ESG issues, the Committee 
will consider the framework on the following page.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information112

Remuneration report for 2020

Framework for assessment of performance underpins

1

Initial review of underpins

How is delivery of the strategy progressing

Have there been any ESG issues

2

Consideration of broader performance and stakeholder experience

How has Pearson performed over the relevant period? Consider both financial and  
non-financial performance.

Impact on  
key performance 
indicators/measures

  In terms of progress against the strategy, is this reflected in key performance  
indicators/measures which were identified as part of the development of the strategy  
(e.g. digital growth)?

  In respect of any ESG issues, has there been any impact on key performance  
indicators/measures?

Wider stakeholder 
experience

What has the experience of wider stakeholders been over the relevant period?

Shareholders

Employees

Customers

Suppliers

Risk and controls

Consider progress of strategy and ESG issues in the context of the approved risk appetite  
and internal control framework.

Culture and conduct

Does decision-making promote a culture in line with approved policies and values?  
Have there been any conduct issues which the Committee should take into account?

Input from others

Draw on input from other Committees (e.g. Reputation & Responsible Committee)  
as well as management teams.

3

Determination of the number of shares vesting

Taking all of the above into account, the Committee to consider whether vesting of the relevant tranche of the  
co-investment award is equitable and reasonable, or whether, and to what extent, a discretionary reduction is required

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information113

Appointment of Chief Financial Officer
Sally Johnson was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on 24 April 2020. Sally’s remuneration arrangements were disclosed in the 2019 annual 
report and accounts on p106. On appointment, Sally’s base salary was set at £515,000 per annum, in line with the starting salary of Coram 
Williams in 2015. Her maximum AIP opportunity is 170% of salary and she will be granted an annual LTIP award with a maximum face value  
of 245% of salary.

Long-term incentives awarded in 2020* 
The following LTIP awards were granted during the year:

Director

Sally Johnson

Date of award

Vesting date

Number of 
shares

Face value 

Face value (% 
of base salary)

Value for 
threshold 
performance 
(% of 
maximum)1

Performance period

1 May 2020 1 May 2023

220,000

£1,262,184

245%

18.3% 1 Jan 20–31 Dec 22

1  Under the adjusted EPS and ROIC elements, 15% vests for threshold performance; under the TSR element, 25% vests for threshold performance. This is the weighted 

average of vesting for threshold.

Face value was determined using a share price of 573.72p (five-day 
average to 1 March 2020). The Committee exercised its discretion in 
determining the appropriate share price to use for this purpose which 
is normally the closing share price on the trading day prior to the date 
of grant (which would have been 459.80p). However, mindful of recent 
share price volatility, the Committee exercised its discretion to use the 
five-day average share price to 1 March 2020, which was the share price 
used to determine share awards for the wider employee population 
and resulted in a lower number of shares being granted.

The Committee reserves the right to adjust payouts up or down before 
they are released if it believes that the vesting outcome does not reflect 
underlying financial or non-financial performance or if such other 
exceptional factors warrant doing so. In making such adjustments,  
the Committee is guided by the principle of aligning shareholder and 
management interests.

Any shares vesting based on performance to 31 December 2022 will  
be subject to an additional two-year holding period to 1 May 2025.

Details of the performance targets for the 2020 long-term incentive awards are set out in the tables below:

Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) (one-third)

Net return on invested capital (ROIC) (one-third)

Relative total shareholder return (TSR) (one-third)

Vesting schedule (% max)

Adjusted EPS for FY22

Vesting schedule (% max) Adjusted net ROIC for FY22

Vesting schedule (% max) Ranked position vs FTSE 100

15%

65%

100%

45.5p

52.5p

60p or above

15%

65%

100%

5.2%

6.2%

7.5% or above

25%

–

100%

Median

–

Upper quartile

Note 1: Straight-line vesting will occur in between the points shown, with no vesting for performance below threshold.
Note 2: Pearson’s TSR performance is currently measured relative to the constituents of the FTSE 100 Index over the performance period. The Committee intends to keep 
this comparator group under review for future LTIP awards.

R Executive Directors’ retirement benefits and entitlements*

Details of the Directors’ pension entitlements and pension-related benefits during the period each served as an Executive Director in 2020 are  
as follows: 

Value of defined benefit

Other allowances in lieu of pension

Total value in 2020

Accrued pension at 31 December 2020

Andy  
Bird 
$000s

John  
Fallon
£000s

Sally  
Johnson
£000s

Coram 
Williams
£000s

–

42

42

–

20

158

178

109

45

–

45

57

1

–

1

40

Note 1: The accrued pension at 31 December 2020 is the deferred annual pension to which the member would be entitled on ceasing pensionable service on  
31 December 2020. It relates to the pension payable from the UK Plan. Normal retirement age is 62.
Note 2: The value of defined benefit reflects the change in value over the period, less inflation. 
Note 3: Other allowances in lieu of pension represent the cash allowances paid. 
Note 4: Total value is the sum of the previous two rows and is disclosed in the single figure of remuneration table.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information114

Remuneration report for 2020

Pension Plans

Andy Bird – Payment in Lieu of Pension 

Andy Bird receives a payment in lieu of pension at 16% of his base 
salary. This is the new hire Executive Director rate in accordance with 
our Directors’ Remuneration Policy as approved at the 2020 AGM 
which was set in line with the pension provision for UK employees  
of a similar age.

John Fallon – The Pearson Pension Plan

John Fallon was a member of the Final Pay Section of the Pearson 
Pension Plan. Mr Fallon left Pearson on 31 December 2020 at which 
point his benefit accrual in the Plan ceased. Mr Fallon attained the 
maximum service accrual for this benefit when he reached 20 years’ 
service in October 2017. With effect from this date, he had accrued a 
benefit of two-thirds of his final pensionable salary and no further 
service-related benefits were accrued under the Plan. Based on the 
2020/21 earnings cap of £170,400, he will have accrued a pension of 
£108,680 per annum at this time.

In addition, during 2020 he received a taxable and non-pensionable 
cash supplement in lieu of the previous FURBS arrangement.  
This supplement was reduced from 26% to 23% of base salary  
during 2020 as the first annual step in reducing John Fallon’s pension 
entitlements to align with the UK workforce rate of 16% of base  
salary under our revised Directors’ Remuneration Policy. There are  
no enhanced early retirement benefits.

Sally Johnson – The Pearson Pension Plan 

Sally is an existing member of the Final Pay Section of the Pearson 
Pension Plan. Her accrual rate is 1/60th of pensionable salary per 
annum, restricted to the Plan earnings cap (£170,400 per annum in 
2020/21). There are no enhanced early retirement benefits.

Coram Williams – The Pearson Pension Plan 

Coram Williams was a member of the Final Pay Section of the Pearson 
Pension Plan. Coram left Pearson on 24 April 2020, at which point his 
benefit accrual in the Plan ceased. He had an accrual rate of 1/60th of 
pensionable salary per annum, restricted to the Plan earnings cap 
(£166,200 per annum in 2019/2020), with continuous service with a 
service gap. There are no enhanced early retirement benefits.

SG

  Directors’ interests in shares and value  
of shareholdings* 

Shareholding guidelines 

Executive Directors are expected to build up a substantial shareholding 
in the company in line with the policy of encouraging widespread 
employee share ownership and to align the interests of Executive 
Directors and shareholders. The current requirement is 300% of base 
salary for the Chief Executive and 200% of base salary for the Chief 
Financial Officer. Shares that count towards these guidelines include 
any shares held unencumbered by an Executive Director, their spouse 
and/or dependent children plus any shares vested but held pending 
release under a share plan and any shares unvested but not subject  
to future performance conditions (on a net of tax basis). Executive 
Directors have five years from their date of appointment to the Board 
to reach the guideline. Once the guideline has been met, it is not 
re-tested, other than when shares are sold.

Executive Directors are expected to retain their current guideline  
(or actual shareholding if lower) for two years following stepping  
down as an Executive Director. This guideline does not apply to shares 
purchased by the Director. On stepping down from the Board,  
John Fallon was reminded of his obligation with regards to this  
post- employment shareholding requirement, which the Committee 
will review on an annual basis.

The shareholding guidelines do not apply to the Chair and  
Non- Executive Directors. However, a minimum of 25% of the  
Non-Executive Directors’ basic fee is paid in Pearson shares that  
the Non-Executive Directors have committed to retain for the period  
of their directorships.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information115

Directors’ interests 

The share interests of the Directors and their connected persons are as follows:

Director

Chair

Sidney Taurel

Executive Directors

Andy Bird 

John Fallon

Sally Johnson

Coram Williams

Non-Executive Directors

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Vivienne Cox

Josh Lewis

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Tim Score

Lincoln Wallen

Current 
shareholding 
(ordinary 
shares) at  
31 Dec 20

Conditional 
shares  
subject to 
performance 
at 31 Dec 20

Conditional 
shares  
subject to 
employment 
only at  
31 Dec 20

Total number 
of ordinary 
and 
conditional 
shares at  
31 Dec 20

Guideline  
(% salary)

Guideline 
met?

223,406

–

586,437

1,208,861

–

–

–

–

–

1,795,298

300%

Yes

450,262

517,000

70,135

1,037,397

300%

11,822

220,000

24,052

255,874

200%

Yes  
(see note 7)

n/a  
(see note 6)

n/a 
(see note 7)

56,108

200%

56,108

32,795

5,061

8,945

14,818

13,838

18,785

2,276

48,472

11,668

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Note 1: Share interests are shown as at 31 December 2020. For Directors who stepped down from the Board during the year, share interests are shown as at the date of their 
stepping down. 
Note 2: Ordinary shares include both ordinary shares listed on the London Stock Exchange and American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) listed on the New York Stock Exchange. 
The figures include both shares and ADRs acquired by individuals under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and any other share plans they might have participated in.
Note 3: Conditional shares subject to performance means unvested shares which remain subject to performance conditions and/or performance underpins and continuing 
employment for a pre-defined period. This includes the LTIP awards granted in 2018, 2019 and 2020, and, in respect of Andy Bird, his co-investment award. The LTIP awards 
granted to John Fallon will be pro-rated for time to reflect his departure prior to the normal vesting date. The performance targets for the 2018 LTIP award were not met and 
therefore these awards will lapse in full.
Note 4: Conditional shares subject to employment only means unvested shares which are subject to a holding period and continued employment. For Sally Johnson this 
includes share awards granted before her appointment to the Board in May 2020.
Note 5: Sally Johnson also holds 2,658 options under the Pearson Save For Shares scheme, a savings-related share acquisition programme open to all employees.  
These are not subject to future performance conditions.
Note 6: Sally Johnson has five years from the date of her appointment as an Executive Director on 24 May 2020 to reach the shareholding guideline.
Note 7: John Fallon met his shareholding guideline. However, as a result of the decrease in share price, the value of his shareholding on departure from the Board was  
less than 300% of salary. Coram Williams had five years from the date of his appointment as an Executive Director on 1 August 2015 to reach the shareholding guideline.  
He stepped down from the Board on 24 April 2020.
Note 8: Graeme Pitkethly purchased 6,075 shares on 8 March 2021, taking his total holding to 8,351 shares. There have been no other changes in the interests of any Director 
between 31 December 2020 and 12 March 2021, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this report.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information116

Remuneration report for 2020

CNF Chair and Non-Executive Director remuneration*
The remuneration paid to the Chair and Non-Executive Directors in respect of the financial years ended 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019 
is as set out in the table below. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chair and Non-Executive Directors voluntarily took a temporary fee 
reduction of 50% and 25%, respectively, for the three-month period May to July. This was donated to charities engaged in COVID-19-related 
activities. The figures in the table below are before this charitable donation.

Director  
£000s

Sidney Taurel

Andy Bird

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Vivienne Cox

Josh Lewis

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Tim Score

Lincoln Wallen

Total

Total fees

500

41

115

88

129

28

99

92

92

116

92

Taxable 
benefits

16

–

1

2

3

7

8

3

1

1

0

2020

Total

Total fees

Taxable 
benefits

516

41

116

90

132

35

107

95

93

117

92

500

–

115

56

128

88

98

91

57

116

91

8

–

–

–

1

2

4

–

–

1

4

2019

Total

508

–

115

56

129

90

102

91

57

117

95

1,392

42

1,434

1,340

20

1,360

Note 1: A minimum of 25% of the Chair’s and Non-Executive Directors’ basic fee is paid in shares.
Note 2: Taxable benefits refer to travel, accommodation and subsistence expenses incurred while attending Board meetings during the period that were paid or reimbursed 
by the company which are deemed by HMRC to be taxable in the UK. The amounts in the table above include the grossed-up cost of UK tax to be paid by the company on 
behalf of the Directors.
Note 3: Andy Bird joined the Pearson Board as a Non-Executive Director with effect from 1 May 2020. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer and an Executive Director of 
Pearson on 19 October 2020. The table above reflects remuneration paid to him in respect of his Non-Executive Director role. Remuneration received in respect of his 
Executive Director role is set out in the table on p107.
Note 4: Sherry Coutu and Graeme Pitkethly joined the Pearson Board as Non-Executive Directors with effect from 1 May 2019. Josh Lewis retired from the Board at the  
AGM in May 2020.

Remuneration arrangements in respect of John Fallon’s 
and Coram Williams’ departure*

John Fallon 

John Fallon stepped down as Chief Executive and as a Director of 
Pearson plc on 18 October 2020. John remained an employee and 
adviser until 31 December 2020 to support the transition to Andy Bird 
as new Chief Executive Officer.

Between 19 October 2020 and 31 December 2020, John was employed 
on his existing remuneration arrangements, save as described below.

  On ceasing to be employed by Pearson, and in accordance with the 
terms of his contract of employment, there was no payment for  
loss of office

  John remained eligible for an award under the AIP for the period  
1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. The award was based on 
Pearson group performance for 2020. As described on p108, 
performance for 2020 resulted in a nil payout 

  John did not receive any award under the LTIP in respect of 2020

  John was treated as a good leaver in respect of his outstanding 
awards under the LTIP and treatment of the awards was in 
accordance with the relevant plan rules. The LTIP awards will vest  
on their normal vesting dates, subject to the achievement of the 
applicable performance conditions. They will be pro-rated to reflect 
John’s departure prior to the normal vesting date. As described on 
p110, the 2018 LTIP will lapse in full

  In accordance with the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, John was 
provided with appropriate support for his transition totalling a value 
of £60,000. Pearson will continue to support John with tax advice and 
filings in connection with his employment with Pearson. Pearson has 
also paid a total of £21,818, including associated taxes, in legal fees in 
connection with his departure

  In line with the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, John is required  
to retain Pearson shares with a value of 300% of his base salary  
(or his actual shareholding if lower) for a period of two years from  
19 October 2020. This guideline does not apply to shares purchased 
by John or earned prior to him being appointed as Chief Executive

Coram Williams 

Coram Williams stepped down from the role of Chief Financial Officer 
on 24 April 2020. Coram Williams did not receive any payment in 
respect of his unserved notice period nor was there any payment for 
loss of office. Coram was not eligible for any AIP payment in respect of 
2020 nor was he granted a 2020 LTIP. He forfeited all unvested LTIP 
awards on departure.

In accordance with the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, Pearson 
continued to support Coram Williams with tax advice and filings  
in connection with any obligations resulting from his employment  
with Pearson.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information117

Payments to former Directors*
There were no payments to former Directors in 2020.

Payments for loss of office*
All payments made to John Fallon and Coram Williams in respect  
of their stepping down as Executive Directors of Pearson are as set  
out opposite.

There were no additional payments for loss of office made to or agreed 
for Directors in 2020.

Service contracts 
The terms and conditions of appointment of our current Directors are 
available for inspection at the company’s registered office during 
normal business hours and at the AGM. 

The Executive Directors have notice periods in their service contracts 
of 12 months from the company and six months from the Executives. 
Their contracts are dated 23 August 2020 (Andy Bird) and 15 January 
2020 (Sally Johnson).

Non-Executive Directors serve Pearson under letters of appointment 
which are renewed annually and do not have service contracts.  
The Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment do not contain 
provision for notice periods or for compensation if their appointments 
are terminated. The Chair’s appointment may be terminated on  
12-months’ notice.

Executive Directors’ non-executive directorships 
Neither of the current Executive Directors, Andy Bird nor Sally Johnson, 
hold any external appointments. 

Historical performance and remuneration

Total shareholder return performance

Below we set out Pearson’s total shareholder return (TSR) performance relative to the FTSE All-Share index on an annual basis over the 10-year 
period 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020. This comparison has been chosen because the FTSE All-Share represents the broad market index 
within which Pearson shares are traded. TSR is the measure of the returns that a company has provided for its shareholders, reflecting share price 
movements and assuming reinvestment of dividends (source: Datastream). 

In accordance with the reporting regulations, this section also presents Pearson’s TSR performance alongside the single figure of total 
remuneration for the Chief Executive over the last 10 years and a summary of the variable pay outcomes relative to the prevailing maximum at the 
time.

Total shareholder return £ 

Pearson TSR
FTSE All-share TSR

250

200

150

100

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

50

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Chief Executive remuneration

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2020

Marjorie Scardino

John Fallon

Andy Bird

Total remuneration  
(single figure, £000s) 

8,340 

5,330 

1,727

1,895

1,263

1,518

1,758

3,094

1,616

Annual incentive (% of maximum) 

Long-term incentive (% of maximum) 

76%

68% 

24% 

37% 

34%

Nil 

51%

Nil

Nil

Nil

24%

Nil

44%

Nil

45%

42%

Nil

33%

855

Nil

Nil

334

N/A

N/A

Note 1: Total remuneration is as reflected in the single total figure of remuneration table.
Note 2: Annual incentive is the actual annual incentive received by the incumbent as a percentage of maximum opportunity.
Note 3: Long-term incentive is the payout of performance-related share awards where the year shown is the final year of the performance period for the purposes of 
calculating the single total figure of remuneration. 
Note 4: The single figure remuneration for Andy Bird has been converted using a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.2772 (average exchange rate for 2020).

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information118

Remuneration report for 2020

Comparative information
The following information is intended to provide additional context 
regarding the total remuneration for Executive Directors. 

Relative percentage change in remuneration of  
Directors and employees

The following table sets out the percentage change in base salary/fees, 
allowances and benefits and annual incentives between 2019 and 2020 
in respect of all Directors of the Company during the year compared  
to the average percentage change for all employees of Pearson plc.  
The figures for all Directors are calculated based on remuneration 
received in the relevant year as set in the tables on p107 and p116.  
For base salary/fees, part-year figures have been pro-rated for the 
purposes of this disclosure. 

While the Committee reviews base pay for the Executive Directors 
relative to the broader employee population, benefits are driven by 
local practices and eligibility is determined by level and individual 
circumstances which do not lend themselves to comparison.

Percentage change in pay for  
Directors compared to the  
average employee of the company 

Relative importance of pay spend 

The Committee considers Directors’ remuneration in the context  
of the company’s allocation and disbursement of resources to  
different stakeholders. We chose adjusted operating profit because 
this is a measure of our ability to reinvest in the company. We include 
dividends because these constitute an important element of our 
return to shareholders.

All figures in £ millions

2020

2019

£m 

%

Headline change

Adjusted  
operating profit

Dividends

Share buybacks

Total wages  
and salaries 

313

146

176

581

147

Nil

-268

-1

–

-46%

-1%

–

1,152

1,258

-106

-8%

Note 1: Adjusted operating profit is as set out in the financial statements. 
Note 2: Wages and salaries include continuing operations only and include 
Directors. Average employee numbers for continuing operations for 2020 were 
21,335 (2019: 22,734). Further details are set out in Note 5 to the financial 
statements on p159 

Base  
salary/fees

Allowances 
and benefits

Annual 
Incentives

Chief Executive to employee pay ratio 

Average employee

Executive Directors 

Andy Bird

John Fallon

Sally Johnson

Coram Williams

Chair and  
Non-Executive Directors

Sidney Taurel

Andy Bird

Elizabeth Corley

Sherry Coutu

Vivienne Cox

Josh Lewis

Linda Lorimer

Michael Lynton

Graeme Pitkethly

Tim Score

Lincoln Wallen

2%

–

1%

–

0%

0%

–

0%

5%

1%

-5%

1%

1%

8%

0%

1%

7%

10%

–

-19%

–

46%

95%

–

–

–

159%

269%

102%

–

–

-20%

-97%

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

The table below illustrates the ratio of Chief Executive to employee pay 
for 2020, using the single total figure of remuneration as disclosed on 
p107 compared to the full-time equivalent total reward of employees 
whose pay is ranked at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles (as 
identified by the gender pay gap methodology) in the GB workforce.

Year

Method

2020

2019

B: Gender pay gap 
methodology

B: Gender pay gap 
methodology

Chief Executive pay ratio

25th 
percentile

50th 
percentile

75th 
percentile

42.5

31.9

19.5

65.9

47.2

36.0

  Gender pay gap data from April 2020 was used to identify the 
employees at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles. Data was analysed 
for a number of employees around each quartile figure to ensure  
that there were no anomalies

  Using the gender pay gap data to identify the quartile employees  
is considered appropriate as this is a good representation of the 
relevant employee population at the year end, and is the most 
practicable methodology given the timing of the disclosure and 
determination of remuneration outcomes for the wider workforce

  Total remuneration for each employee, which was calculated  
with reference to 31 December 2020, has been compared to the  
Chief Executive’s single figure. For 2020, the Chief Executive’s single 
figure is a combined figure for Andy Bird and John Fallon, recognising 
the change in leadership during the year. Andy Bird’s single figure  
has been converted using a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.2772  
(the average exchange rate for 2020)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information 
119

  For the quartile employees, total remuneration has been calculated 
on a similar basis to the Chief Executive’s single figure. Base salary 
and pension are based on full year figures taken from payroll. 
Benefits have been taken from the relevant individual’s P11D in line 
with the methodology used for the Executive Directors. Annual bonus 
figures are based on the relevant manager recommendations and 
relate to performance in 2020. None of the employees at the 25th, 
50th or 75th percentile had share awards vesting in 2020

  Total remuneration figures for the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile 
employees are as follows: £27,996, £37,275 and £60,970. The 
respective base salaries are: £27,103, £33,879 and £52,000

  A significant proportion of the Chief Executive’s pay is linked to 
performance and, in respect of the LTIP, share price growth. 
Therefore, the Chief Executive’s pay varies year-on-year based on 
company performance. In 2020, there was no payout for Executive 
Directors under either the AIP or the LTIP, reflecting the unforeseen 
impact of COVID-19 on the business. As such, the Chief Executive’s 
single figure for 2020 comprises only fixed pay. In comparison,  
John Fallon’s single figure for 2019 included the vesting of his  
2017 LTIP award. This is the primary reason for the reduction in the 
Chief Executive pay ratio for 2020

  The company considers the median pay ratio consistent with the 
company’s wider policies on employee pay, reward and progression. 
The Committee remains focused on ensuring that remuneration 
arrangements in place for the broader employee population are 
consistent with the need to attract and retain the right talent for  
the company’s digital future 

Dilution and use of equity 

Pearson can use existing shares bought in the market, treasury shares 
or newly issued shares to satisfy awards under the company’s various 
share plans. For restricted stock awards under the LTIP, the company 
would normally expect to use market purchased shares. There are 
limits on the amount of new-issue equity we can use. In any rolling 
10-year period, no more than 10% of Pearson equity will be issued,  
or be capable of being issued, under all Pearson’s share plans, and no 
more than 5% of Pearson equity will be issued, or be capable of being 
issued, under Executive or discretionary plans. The headroom available 
for all Pearson plans, Executive or discretionary, and shares held in 
trust is as follows:

Headroom 

All Pearson plans 

Executive or discretionary plans 

Shares held in trust 

2020

8.1%

5.0%

4.9%

The Remuneration Committee in 2020 

Role

Chair

Name

Title

Elizabeth Corley

Independent  
Non-Executive Directors

Andy Bird (from 1 May 
until 18 October 2020)1

Sherry Coutu

Josh Lewis  
(until 24 April 2020)

Tim Score

Sidney Taurel2

Chair of the Board

Internal attendees

John Fallon

Andy Bird1

Coram Williams

Sally Johnson

Chief Executive to  
18 October 2020

Chief Executive from  
19 October 2020

Chief Financial Officer to  
24 April 2020

Chief Financial Officer from 
24 April 2020

Anna Vikström Persson Chief Human  

Paul Christian

Stephen Jones

Graeme Baldwin 

Resources Officer

Senior Vice  
President – Reward

Company Secretary to  
30 June 2020

Company Secretary from  
1 July 2020

External advisers

Deloitte LLP

1  Andy Bird was not present at any Remuneration Committee meeting where his 

remuneration was discussed.

2  Sidney Taurel was a member of the Committee throughout 2020 as permitted 

under the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information120

Remuneration report for 2020

Advisers to the Remuneration Committee 
During 2020, the Remuneration Committee received advice from 
independent Remuneration Committee advisers, Deloitte LLP. Deloitte 
LLP were appointed by the Committee in July 2017 following a tender 
process. The Committee also received legal advice from Freshfields 
Bruckhaus Deringer LLP in the course of the year.

Terms of reference
The Committee’s full charter and terms of reference are available on 
the Governance page of the company’s website. A summary of the 
Committee’s responsibilities is set out below.

The terms of reference reflect the provisions of the 2018 Code.

Deloitte LLP supplied the Committee with advice on current market 
trends and developments, incentive plan design and target setting, 
investor engagement and other general Executive remuneration 
matters. In respect of their services to the Committee during 2020, 
Deloitte LLP were paid fees, which were charged on a time spent  
basis, of £229,150. During the year, separate teams within Deloitte LLP 
also provided Pearson plc with certain tax and other advisory and 
consultancy services.

Deloitte LLP are founding members of the Remuneration Consultants’ 
Group and adhere to its Code of Conduct.

The Committee remains satisfied that the advice provided by Deloitte 
LLP was objective and independent, and that the provision of other 
services in no way compromised their independence. It is the view of 
the Committee that the Deloitte LLP engagement partner and team 
that provide remuneration advice to the Committee do not have 
connections with Pearson or its Directors that may impair their 
independence. The Committee reviewed the potential for conflicts  
of interest and judged that there were appropriate safeguards  
against such conflicts.

Committee responsibilities

Determine and review policy

Determine and regularly review the remuneration policies for the 
Executive Directors, the presidents and other members of Pearson’s 
Executive Management (who report directly to the Chief Executive). 
These policies include base salary, annual and long-term incentives, 
pension arrangements, any other benefits, and termination of 
employment. When setting remuneration policy, the Committee 
also takes into account remuneration practices and related policies 
for the wider workforce.

Shareholder engagement

Ensure the company maintains an appropriate level of engagement 
with its shareholders and shareholder representative bodies in 
relation to the remuneration policy and its implementation.

Review and approve implementation

Regularly review the implementation and operation of the 
remuneration policy and approve the individual remuneration and 
benefits packages of Executive Management.

Approve performance-related plans

Approve the design of, and determine targets for, any performance-
related pay plans operated by the Group for the Pearson Executive 
Management team and approve the total payments to be made 
under such plans.

Set termination arrangements

Advise and decide on general and specific remuneration 
arrangements in connection with the termination of employment  
of Executive Management.

Determine Chair’s remuneration

Delegate responsibility for determining the remuneration and 
benefits package of the Chair of the Board.

Appoint remuneration consultants

Appoint and set the terms of engagement for any remuneration 
consultants who advise the Committee, and monitor the cost of  
such advice.

Talent, retention and gender pay gap

Review updates from management on talent, retention and  
gender pay gap.

Workforce remuneration 

Have oversight of workforce remuneration, policies and practice  
for the wider organisation.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationVoting on remuneration resolutions 
The following table summarises the details of votes cast in respect of 
the remuneration resolutions: 

Annual remuneration votes  
(2020 AGM)

2020 Remuneration Policy vote 
(2020 AGM)

Amendment to Remuneration 
Policy (2020 EGM)

% of votes 
cast for

% of votes 
cast against

Votes 
withheld

99.37%

0.63% 3,310,701

95.12%

4.88%

219,641

67.22%

32.78%

370,074

The Directors’ remuneration report has been approved by the Board 
on 15 March 2021 and signed on its behalf by: 

Elizabeth Corley 
Chair of Remuneration Committee

121

Remuneration Committee meeting focus during 2020 
During the year the Committee undertook the following activities: 

  Reviewed and approved 2019 annual and long-term performance 
and payouts to Executive Directors and senior management

  Reviewed and approved incentive arrangements for the company 
and how this will apply to Executive Directors and senior 
management for 2020

  Determined remuneration arrangements for the appointment  
of a new Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer. This included 
engaging extensively with shareholders in respect of remuneration 
arrangements for the new Chief Executive, and continued monitoring 
of shareholder views following the outcome of the General Meeting in 
September 2020 

  Approved remuneration arrangements for a number of new 
appointments to the Executive Committee

  Approved remuneration arrangements to apply in respect of  
John Fallon’s retirement 

  Reviewed shareholder and shareholder representative body 
feedback on remuneration, shareholder voting at Pearson’s 2020 
AGM and considered shareholder engagement strategy. Received 
input from investor relations on market expectations

  Received updates on the financial performance of the business and 
progress against strategic measures. Noted and reviewed the status 
of in-flight incentives

  Received updates on pay and conditions across the company a 
s a whole and took these into account when determining  
executive remuneration

  Noted updates on corporate governance, including a review of the 
2020 AGM remuneration reporting season

  Reviewed the company’s gender pay gap disclosures and noted the 
actions being taken to address the gap

  Noted the activity of the Standing Committee of the Board in relation 
to the operation of the company’s equity-based reward programmes 
and noted the company’s use of equity for employee share plans

Committee evaluation
Annually, the Committee reviews performance, constitution and 
charter and terms of reference to ensure it is operating at maximum 
effectiveness and recommends any changes it considers necessary to 
the Board for approval. Overall, following its review in 2020, it was 
considered that the Committee is operating effectively with strong 
processes in place and a high quality of discussion. The review 
recognised the Committee’s efforts during 2020, in particular its 
contribution towards the Chief Executive succession process.  
Going forward, the Committee will continue to ensure remuneration 
arrangements for senior management support the attraction of key 
talent as well as the delivery of the company’s strategy. The Committee 
remains vigilant in assessing the extent to which its activities support 
and enable progress in the company.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information122

Additional disclosures

Pages 66–126 of this document comprise the Directors’ report for the 
year ended 31 December 2020.

Set out below is other statutory and regulatory information that 
Pearson is required to disclose in its Directors’ report.

We have set out clear capital allocation priorities as follows:

  Maintaining a strong balance sheet and solid investment-grade  
credit ratings through an appropriate capital structure

  Investing in the business to drive organic growth  

Going concern
The Directors have made an assessment of the Group’s ability to 
continue as a going concern and consider it appropriate to adopt  
the going concern basis of accounting.

Viability statement
As set out on p63, the Board has also reviewed the prospects of 
Pearson over the three-year period to December 2023 taking account 
of the company’s three-year plan, a ‘severe but plausible’ downside 
case and further stress-testing based on the principal risks set out 
from p60 

Based on the results of these procedures, and considering the 
company’s strong balance sheet, the Directors have a reasonable 
expectation that Pearson will be able to continue in operation and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three-year period ending 
December 2023. Further details of the Group’s liquidity are shown  
in the Financial review on p35 

Share capital
Details of share issues and cancellations are given in note 27 to the 
financial statements on p189. The company has a single class of shares 
which is divided into ordinary shares of 25p each. The ordinary shares 
are in registered form. As at 31 December 2020, 753,257,638 ordinary 
shares were in issue. At the AGM held on 24 April 2020, the company 
was authorised, subject to certain conditions, to acquire up to 
76,063,126 ordinary shares by market purchase and to issue up to 
507,087,512 ordinary shares. Shareholders will be asked to renew  
this authority at the AGM on 30 April 2021.

Share buyback
In December, we announced the sale of our 25% stake in Penguin 
Random House to Bertelsmann, generating total net proceeds of 
approximately $675m. The partial divestment of our stake in Penguin 
Random House was in line with our strategy for simplification and 
allowed us to create significant shareholder value through the 
synergies from the integration of the two businesses. Our stake  
in Penguin Random House will have generated c.£1.9bn in net  
disposal proceeds and dividends.

In line with our capital allocation priorities (to the right), the Board 
decided that we would use the proceeds from the above transaction to 
maintain a strong balance sheet and invest in our business in addition 
to returning £350m of surplus capital to shareholders following the 
closing of the transaction. 

The share buyback programme, announced in December 2019, 
commenced on 16 January 2020 and was paused until further notice on 
23 March 2020 as a prudent measure while the impact of COVID-19 was 
assessed. The original intention was to buy back approximately £350m 
of shares and at the date of pausing the programme approximately 
30m shares had been bought back and cancelled at a cost of £176m. 
For further details, see note 27 to the financial statements.

The Board considers that maintaining a very strong balance sheet is 
appropriate, and as such there are no plans to reinitiate the buyback.

  A focused and disciplined approach to value enhancing acquisitions

  Delivering shareholder returns through a sustainable and 
progressive dividend policy

  Returning surplus cash to shareholders where appropriate through 
buybacks or special dividends

Major shareholders
Information provided to the company pursuant to the Financial 
Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules 
(DTR) is published on a Regulatory Information Service and on the 
company’s website.

As at 31 December 2020, the company had been notified under  
DTR 5 of the following holders of significant voting rights in its shares.

Lindsell Train Limited

Schroders plc1

Silchester International Investors LLP 

BlackRock, Inc.2

Cevian Capital II GP Limited

FIL Limited3

Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and its group

Libyan Investment Authority4

Number of 
voting rights 

Percentage as 
at date of 
notification

84,082,002

11.18%

75,127,663

75,051,050

48,912,172

40,623,241

39,151,633

41,236,375

24,431,000

9.98%

9.97%

6.50%

5.40%

5.19%

5.02%

3.01%

1 

2 

3 

Includes 32,725 (0.004%) qualifying financial instruments to which voting rights 
are attached. 
Includes 1,275,234 (0.16%) qualifying financial instruments to which voting rights 
are attached.
Includes 3,208,453 (0.43%) qualifying financial instruments to which voting 
rights are attached. 

4  Based on notification to the company dated 7 June 2010. We have been notified 
of no change to this holding since that date. Assets belonging to, or owned,  
held or controlled on 16 September 2011 by the Libyan Investment Authority 
and located outside Libya on that date, are frozen in accordance with The Libya 
(Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020.

Between 31 December 2020 and 12 March 2021, being the latest 
practicable date before the publication of this report, the company 
received further notifications under DTR 5, with the most recent 
positions being as follows:

BlackRock, Inc.1

FIL Limited2

Number of 
voting rights 

 52,806,616

37,330,624

Percentage as 
at date of 
notification

7.00%

<5%

1 

2 

Includes 493,684 (0.06%) qualifying financial instruments to which voting rights 
are attached.
Includes 12,021,420 (1.59%) qualifying financial instruments to which voting 
rights are attached. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information123

Annual General Meeting
The notice convening the AGM, to be held at 12:00 noon on Friday, 
30 April 2021 at 190 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7BH, is contained 
in a circular to shareholders to be dated 24 March 2021.

Registered auditors
In accordance with section 489 of the Act, a resolution proposing the 
reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors to the 
company will be proposed at the AGM, at a level of remuneration 
to be agreed by the Audit Committee.

Amendment to Articles of Association
Any amendments to the Articles of Association of the company  
(the Articles) may be made in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006 (the Act) by way of a special resolution. At the 
forthcoming AGM, the Board is proposing amendments to the 
company’s current Articles. For additional details, see the 
Notice of Meeting. 

Rights attaching to shares
The rights attaching to the ordinary shares are defined in the Articles. 
A shareholder whose name appears on the company’s register 
of members can choose whether his/her shares are evidenced by 
share certificates (i.e. in certificated form) or held electronically 
(i.e. uncertificated form) in CREST (the electronic settlement system 
in the UK).

Subject to any restrictions below, shareholders may attend any general 
meeting of the company and, on a show of hands, every shareholder 
(or his/her representative) who is present at a general meeting has one 
vote on each resolution and, on a poll, every shareholder (whether an 
individual or a corporation) present in person or by proxy shall have 
one vote for every 25p of nominal share capital held. A resolution put 
to the vote at a general meeting is decided on a show of hands unless 
before, or on the declaration of the result of, a vote on a show of  
hands, a poll is demanded. A poll can be demanded by the Chair of the 
meeting, or by at least three shareholders (or their representatives) 
present in person and having the right to vote, or by any shareholders 
(or their representatives) present in person having at least 10% of the 
total voting rights of all shareholders, or by any shareholders (or their 
representatives) present in person holding ordinary shares on which 
an aggregate sum has been paid up of at least 10% of the total sum 
paid up on all ordinary shares. At this year’s AGM, voting will again be 
conducted on a poll, consistent with best practice.

Shareholders can declare a final dividend by passing an ordinary 
resolution but the amount of the dividend cannot exceed the amount 
recommended by the Board. The Board can pay interim dividends on 
any class of shares of the amounts and on the dates and for the periods 
they decide. In all cases, the distributable profits of the company must 
be sufficient to justify the payment of the relevant dividend.

The Board may, if authorised by an ordinary resolution of the 
shareholders, offer any shareholder the right to elect to receive new 
ordinary shares, which will be credited as fully paid, instead of their 
cash dividend.

Any dividend which has not been claimed for 12 years after it became 
due for payment will be forfeited and will then belong to the company, 
unless the Directors decide otherwise. 

If the company is wound up, the liquidator can, with the sanction  
of a special resolution passed by the shareholders, divide among the 
shareholders all or any part of the assets of the company and he/she 
can value assets and determine how the division shall be carried out  
as between the shareholders or different classes of shareholders.  
The liquidator can also, with the same sanction, transfer the whole or 
any part of the assets to trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of  
the shareholders.

Voting at general meetings
Any form of proxy sent by the shareholders to the company in  
relation to any general meeting must be delivered to the company  
(via its registrars), whether in written or electronic form, not less  
than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the meeting or 
adjourned meeting at which the person named in the appointment 
proposes to vote. 

The Board may decide that a shareholder is not entitled to attend or 
vote either personally or by proxy at a general meeting or to exercise 
any other right conferred by being a shareholder if he/she or any 
person with an interest in shares has been sent a notice under section 
793 of the Act (which confers upon public companies the power to 
require information with respect to interests in their voting shares)  
and he/she or any interested person failed to supply the company  
with the information requested within 14 days after delivery of that 
notice. The Board may also decide, where the relevant shareholding 
comprises at least 0.25% of the nominal value of the issued shares of 
that class, that no dividend is payable in respect of those default shares 
and that no transfer of any default shares shall be registered.

Pearson operates an employee benefit trust to hold shares, pending 
employees becoming entitled to them under the company’s employee 
share plans. There were 587,977 shares held as at 31 December 2020. 
The trust has an independent trustee which has full discretion in 
relation to the voting of such shares. A dividend waiver operates 
on the shares held in the trust. 

Pearson also operates two nominee shareholding arrangements which 
hold shares on behalf of employees. There were 2,734,235 shares  
held in the Sharestore account and 1,129,959 shares held in the Global 
Nominee account as at 31 December 2020. The beneficial owners of 
shares held in Sharestore are invited to submit voting instructions 
online at www.shareview.co.uk. If no instructions are given by the 
beneficial owner by the date specified, the trustees holding these 
shares will not exercise the voting rights. The Global Nominees closed 
on 31 December 2020 following the transfer of administration to 
Computershare Investor Services plc. Beneficial holders of shares held 
in the Computershare Share Plan Account (SPA) are invited to submit 
voting instructions online at www.equateplus.com. If no instructions 
are given by the beneficial owner by the date specified, the nominee 
holding these shares will not exercise the voting rights.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information124

Additional disclosures continued

Transfer of shares
The Board may refuse to register a transfer of a certificated share 
which is not fully paid, provided that the refusal does not prevent 
dealings in shares in the company from taking place on an open and 
proper basis. The Board may also refuse to register a transfer of a 
certificated share unless: (i) the instrument of transfer is lodged,  
duly stamped (if stampable), at the registered office of the company  
or any other place decided by the Board, and is accompanied by the 
certificate for the share to which it relates and such other evidence as 
the Board may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to 
make the transfer; (ii) it is in respect of only one class of shares; and (iii) 
it is in favour of not more than four transferees.

Transfers of uncertificated shares must be carried out using CREST and 
the Board can refuse to register a transfer of an uncertificated share in 
accordance with the regulations governing the operation of CREST.

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Articles, the Board has resolved 
that all Directors should offer themselves for re-election annually,  
in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code).

The company may by ordinary resolution remove any Director before 
the expiration of his/her term of office. In addition, the Board may 
terminate an agreement or arrangement with any Director for the 
provision of his/her services to the company.

Powers of the Directors
Subject to the Articles, the Act and any directions given by special 
resolution, the business of the company will be managed by the Board 
who may exercise all the powers of the company, including powers 
relating to the issue and/or buying back of shares by the company 
(subject to authorisation, and any statutory restrictions or restrictions 
imposed by shareholders in a general meeting).

Variation of rights
If at any time the capital of the company is divided into different classes 
of shares, the special rights attaching to any class may be varied or 
revoked either:

(i)  with the written consent of the holders of at least 75% in nominal 

value of the issued shares of the relevant class or

(ii)  with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate 

general meeting of the holders of the shares of the relevant class.

Without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the 
holders of any existing shares or class of shares, any share may be 
issued with such preferred, deferred or other special rights, or such 
restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital  
or otherwise as the company may from time to time by ordinary 
resolution determine.

Appointment and replacement of Directors
The Articles contain the following provisions in relation to Directors.

Directors shall be no less than two in number. Directors may be 
appointed by the company by ordinary resolution or by the Board.  
A Director appointed by the Board shall hold office only until the next 
AGM and shall then be eligible for reappointment, but shall not be 
taken into account in determining the Directors or the number of 
Directors who are to retire by rotation at that meeting. The Board may 
from time to time appoint one or more Directors to hold Executive 
office with the company for such period (subject to the provisions of 
the Act) and upon such terms as the Board may decide and may  
revoke or terminate any appointment so made.

The Articles provide that, at every AGM of the company, at least 
one-third of the Directors shall retire by rotation (or, if their number is 
not a multiple of three, the number nearest to one-third). The first 
Directors to retire by rotation shall be those who wish to retire and not 
offer themselves for re-election. Any further Directors so to retire shall 
be those of the other Directors subject to retirement by rotation who 
have been longest in office since they were last re-elected but, as 
between persons who became or were last re-elected on the same  
day, those to retire shall (unless they otherwise agree among 
themselves) be determined by lot. In addition, any Director who  
would not otherwise be required to retire shall retire by rotation  
at the third AGM after they were last re-elected.

Directors’ indemnities
A qualifying third-party indemnity (QTPI), as permitted by the Articles 
and sections 232 and 234 of the Act, has been granted by the company 
to each of its Directors. Under the provisions of the QTPI, the company 
undertakes to indemnify each Director against liability to third parties 
(excluding criminal and regulatory penalties) and to pay Directors’ costs 
as incurred, provided that they are reimbursed to the company if the 
Director is found guilty, the court refuses to grant the relief sought or, 
in an action brought by the company, judgement is given against  
the Director. The indemnity has been in force for the financial year 
ended 31 December 2020 and is currently in force. The company has 
purchased and maintains Directors’ and Officers’ insurance cover 
against certain legal liabilities and costs for claims in connection 
with any act or omission by such Directors and Officers in the 
execution of their duties.

Significant agreements
The following significant agreements contain provisions entitling the 
counterparties to exercise termination or other rights in the event of 
a change of control of the company.

At 31 December 2020, the Group’s principal bank facility, the $1,190m 
revolving credit facility agreement, allowed that upon a change of 
control of the company, any participating bank may require its 
outstanding advances, together with accrued interest and any other 
amounts payable in respect of such facility, and its commitments,  
to be cancelled, each within 60 days of notification to the banks by the 
agent. The facility was undrawn at year end. The group’s outstanding 
Fixed Rate Notes (See note 18 Borrowings for more information) also 
contain a provision requiring that, in the event of a change of control 
which leads to a downgrade in credit rating below Baa3 (Moody’s)  
or BBB- (Standard and Poor’s), the company is required to make an 
offer to investors to repurchase outstanding instruments at par plus 
accrued interest, which investors are not obliged to accept. For these 
purposes, a ‘change of control’ occurs if the company becomes a 
subsidiary of any other company, or one or more persons acting either 
individually or in concert obtains control (as defined in section 1124 of 
the Corporation Tax Act 2010) of the company.

Shares acquired through the company’s employee share plans rank 
pari passu with shares in issue and have no special rights. For legal and 
practical reasons, the rules of these plans set out the consequences of 
a change of control of the company.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information125

Other statutory information
Other information that is required by the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) 
and by the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts 
and Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended) to be included in the 
Directors’ report, and which is incorporated by reference, can be 
located as follows:

The Audit Committee is also available to advise the Board on certain 
aspects of the report, to enable the Directors to fulfil their 
responsibility in this regard. The Directors consider that the annual 
report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and 
understandable and provides the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the company’s position, performance,  
business model and strategy.

Summary disclosures index

Dividend recommendation

Financial instruments and financial risk management

Important events since year end

Future development of the business

Research and development activities

Employment of disabled persons

Employee involvement

Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption data

Statement describing employee engagement

Statement describing regard to suppliers, customers and  
other stakeholders’ interests

See more

p32 

p176 

p36 

p12 

p26 

p50 

p49 

p46 

p30 

p30 

With the exception of the dividend waiver described on p123 there is 
no information to be disclosed in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.4.

No political donations or contributions were made or expenditure 
incurred by the company or its subsidiaries during the year.

Fair, balanced and understandable reporting and 
disclosure of information
As required by the Code, we have established arrangements to ensure 
that all information we report to investors and regulators is fair, 
balanced and understandable. A process and timetable for the 
production and approval of this year’s report was agreed by the  
Board at its meeting in December 2020. The full Board then had the 
opportunity to review and comment on the report as it progressed.

Representatives from financial reporting, corporate affairs, company 
secretarial, legal and risk are involved in the preparation and review  
of the annual report to ensure a cohesive and balanced approach  
and, as with all of our financial reporting, our Verification Committee 
conducts a thorough verification of narrative and financial statements. 
We also have procedures in place to ensure the timely release of inside 
information, through our Market Disclosure Committee.

The Directors also confirm that, for each Director in office at the date of 
this report:

  so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information 
of which the Group and company’s auditors are unaware

  they have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as 
Directors in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit 
information and to establish that the Group and the company’s 
auditors are aware of that information.

Directors in office
The following Directors were in office during the year:

A Bird – appointed on 1 May 2020

L K Lorimer

E P L Corley

S L Coutu 

V Cox

M M Lynton

G D Pitkethly

T Score

J J Fallon – retired on 18 October 2020 S Taurel

S K M Johnson – appointed on  
24 April 2020

L A Wallen

S J Lewis – retired on 24 April 2020

C Williams – resigned 24 April 2020

The Directors’ report has been approved by the Board on 15 March 
2021 and signed on its behalf by:

Graeme Baldwin 
Company Secretary

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information126

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 
The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the 
financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulation.

The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the 
Group and company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements 
for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors have prepared  
the Group and company financial statements in accordance with 
International Accounting Standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Additionally, the Financial 
Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules 
require the Directors to prepare the Group financial statements in 
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted 
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European 
Union. Under company law, the Directors must not approve the 
financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and 
fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and company and of the 
profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the financial 
statements, the Directors are required to:

  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently

  state whether for the Group and company financial statements, 
International Accounting Standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, for the Group, 
International Financial Reporting Standards adopted pursuant to 
Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union 
have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed  
and explained in the financial statements 

  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable  
and prudent

  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless  
it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and company will 
continue in business

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records 
that are sufficient to show and explain the Group and company’s 
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the 
financial position of the Group and company and enable them to 
ensure that the financial statements and the Directors’ remuneration 
report comply with the Companies Act 2000.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the 
company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the 
preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ  
from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on  
pp69–70, confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:

  the Group and company financial statements, which have been 
prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards in 
conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and,  
for the Group, International Financial Reporting Standards adopted 
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the 
European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 
financial position and profit of the Group and company 

  the Strategic report contained in the annual report includes a fair 
review of the development and performance of the business and the 
position of the Group and company, together with a description of  
the principal risks and uncertainties that they face

This responsibility statement has been approved by the Board  
on 15 March 2021 and signed on its behalf by: 

Sally Johnson 
Chief Financial Officer

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information127

Financial  
statements

In this section

Consolidated  
financial statements
128   Independent auditors’  
report to the members  
of Pearson plc

137  Consolidated  

income statement

138  Consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income

160  7  Income tax

162  8  Earnings per share

164  9  Dividends

164  10  Property, plant  
and equipment

165  11 Intangible assets

168  12  Investments in joint 

ventures and associates

169  13 Deferred income tax

139  Consolidated balance sheet

170  14  Classification of  

financial instruments

171  15 Other financial assets

171  16  Derivative financial 

instruments and  
hedge accounting

141  Consolidated statement of 

changes in equity

142  Consolidated  

cash flow statement

Notes to the consolidated 
financial statements
143  1  Accounting policies

150  2  Segment information

152  3 

 Revenue from contracts 
with customers

157  4  Operating expenses

159  5  Employee information

159  6  Net finance costs

Company financial 
statements
199  Company balance sheet

200  Company statement of 
changes in equity

201  Company cash flow 

statement

202  Notes to the company 
financial statements

181  23  Provisions for other 

liabilities and charges

181  24 Trade and other liabilities

182  25  Retirement benefit and 

other post-retirement 
obligations

188  26 Share-based payments

189  27  Share capital and  

share premium

189  28 Treasury shares

190  29  Other comprehensive 

income

191  30 Business combinations

192  31 Disposals

193  32 Held for sale

174   17  Cash and cash equivalents  
(excluding overdrafts)

194  33  Cash generated  
from operations

175  18  Financial liabilities – 
borrowings

195  34  Contingencies  

and commitments

176  19  Financial risk management

196  35 Leases

179  20  Intangible assets –  

197  36  Related party transactions

pre-publication

179  21 Inventories

180  22  Trade and  

other receivables

197  37  Events after the  

balance sheet date

198  38  Accounts and  

audit exemptions

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information128

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Pearson plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion

In our opinion, Pearson plc’s consolidated financial statements and 
company financial statements (the ‘financial statements’):

  give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the 
company’s affairs at 31 December 2020 and of the Group’s profit and 
the Group’s and company’s cash flows for the year then ended;

  have been properly prepared in accordance with international 
accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the 
Companies Act 2006; and

  have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 
Companies Act 2006. 

We have audited the financial statements, included within the  
Annual Report and Accounts (the “Annual Report”), which comprise: 
the consolidated and company balance sheets at 31 December 2020; 
the consolidated income statement and consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income, the consolidated and company cash flow 
statements and the consolidated and company statements of  
changes in equity for the year then ended; and the notes to the 
financial statements, which include a description of the significant 
accounting policies.

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.

Our audit approach

Overview

Audit scope

  We conducted our Group audit work in three key territories,  
being the UK, US and Brazil. This included full scope audits at three 
reporting components and specific audit procedures at a further 
eight components. The territories where we conducted audit 
procedures, together with work performed at corporate functions 
and at the Group level, accounted for approximately: 73% of  
the Group’s revenue; 73% of the Group’s statutory profit  
before tax; and 72% of the Group’s adjusted profit before tax.
  For the purposes of the parent company audit, we performed  
a full scope audit in the UK of all material financial statement  
line items.

Key audit matters

  Carrying value of goodwill (Group)
  Returns provisioning (Group)
  Recoverability of pre-publication assets (Group)
  Provisions for uncertain tax positions (Group)
  Impact of COVID-19 (Group and company)
  Risk of fraud in revenue recognition (Group)
  Carrying value of investments in subsidiaries (company)

Materiality

  Overall Group materiality: £19 million (2019: £27 million)  
based on approximately 5% of the three year average of the 
Group’s adjusted profit before tax.
  Overall company materiality: £45 million (2019: £49 million)  
based on approximately 1% of net assets.
  Performance materiality: £14 million (Group) and  
£34 million (company).

Separate opinion in relation to international financial 
reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) 
No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union
As explained in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the 
Group, in addition to applying international accounting standards in 
conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, has also 
applied international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant 
to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements have been 
properly prepared in accordance with international financial reporting 
standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it 
applies in the European Union.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on 
Auditing (UK) (‘ISAs (UK)’) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under 
ISAs (UK) are further described in the auditors’ responsibilities for the 
audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that 
the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to 
provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical 
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements 
in the UK, which include the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to 
listed public interest entities and we have fulfilled our other ethical 
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit 
services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to 
the Group.

Other than those disclosed in note 4 to the consolidated financial 
statements, we have provided no non-audit services to the Group in 
the period under audit.

The scope of our audit

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed 
the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.

Capability of the audit in detecting irregularities, including fraud

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance  
with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined in the auditors’ responsibilities for the audit  
of the financial statements section, to detect material misstatements  
in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our 
procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud,  
is detailed below.

Based on our understanding of the Group and industry in which it 
operates, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance  
with laws and regulations related to failure to comply with UK  
and international tax regulations, adherence to data protection 
requirements in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates and holds 
data and compliance with anti-bribery and corruption legislation in the 
jurisdictions in which the Group operates and we considered the extent 
to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial 
statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a 
direct impact on the preparation of the financial statements such as the 
Companies Act 2006 and Listing Rules. We evaluated management’s 
incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial 
statements (including the risk of override of controls) and we determined 
that the principal risks related to posting inappropriate journal entries, 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information129

management bias in accounting for estimates, including estimates 
relating to revenue recognition, and manipulation of cut-off of shipments 
at major warehouse locations. The Group engagement team shared this 
risk assessment with the component auditors so that they could include 
appropriate audit procedures in response to such risks in their work. 
Audit procedures performed by the Group engagement team and/or 
component auditors included:

  Discussions with management, internal audit and the Group’s legal 
advisors, including considerations of known or suspected instances 
of non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;

  Review of correspondence received from regulators and 
consideration of the impact, if any, on our audit and the disclosures 
made in the financial statements;

  Evaluation and testing of the effectiveness of management’s controls 
designed to prevent and detect irregularities;

  Assessment of matters reported on the Group’s whistleblowing 
helpline and the results of management’s investigation of such matters;

  Identification and testing of significant manual journal entries; 

  Testing of cut-off of shipments at major warehouse locations; and

  Testing of assumptions and judgements made by management in 
making significant accounting estimates. 

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. 
We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance  
with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and 
transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not 
detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk 

of not detecting one resulting from error as fraud may involve 
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional 
misrepresentations or through collusion.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional 
judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant 
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) 
identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect 
on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; 
and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and 
any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, 
were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements 
as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon and we do not provide a 
separate opinion on these matters.

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.

The impact of COVID-19 is a new key audit matter this year. Finance 
transformation, which was a key audit matter last year, is no longer 
included as the more significant elements of the Group’s finance 
transformation programme were completed prior to 2020 and as the 
level of change to financial systems, processes and controls in 2020 has 
been significantly less than in 2019. In addition, we have removed the  
key audit matter related to disposals as the sale of the Group’s US K-12 
Courseware business in 2019 involved a number of complex accounting 
judgements and the application of management estimates whereas the 
sale of the Group’s remaining stake in Penguin Random House in 2020, 
while material, did not involve complex judgements or estimation. 
Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Carrying value of goodwill (Group)

Refer to note 11 in the consolidated 
financial statements. 

The Group recorded goodwill  
of £2,094m (2019: £2,139m)  
at 31 December 2020.

The carrying values of goodwill and 
intangible assets are dependent on 
estimates of future cash flows of  
the underlying cash generating  
units (CGUs) and there is a risk that if 
management does not achieve these 
cash flow estimates it could give rise to 
further impairment charges. This risk 
increases in periods when the Group’s 
trading performance and projections 
do not meet expectations.

The impairment reviews performed  
by management contain a number of 
significant judgements and estimates. 
Changes in these assumptions  
can result in materially different 
impairment charges or available 
headroom. 

No impairment charge has been 
recorded in 2020.

We obtained management’s value in use impairment model at 31 December 2020 and we tested its 
mathematical integrity. We validated the carrying amounts of the net assets subject to impairment testing 
to the underlying accounting records, making sure that there was appropriate consistency between the 
assets and liabilities that were included in management’s assessment and the related cash flows.

We agreed the forecast cash flows to board approved budgets and strategic plans and we assessed how 
these budgets and strategic plans are compiled. We evaluated management’s related judgements and 
estimates, including short-term revenue and operating profit growth rates, cash conversion, corporate 
cost allocations and restructuring savings. We compared management’s forecasts and key assumptions 
to industry projections and comparable companies where this information was available and we 
evaluated the historical accuracy of management’s budgeting and forecasting.

We deployed valuations experts to assess the perpetuity growth rate and discount rate for each CGU  
by comparison with third party information, past performance and relevant risk factors. We compared 
management’s valuations with third party valuations implied by trading and transaction multiples of  
the Group’s competitors where this information was available for specific CGUs. 

Our procedures focused on the North American Courseware, OPM, Other International and Brazil CGUs 
where headroom is lower or more sensitive to changes in key assumptions. 

We performed our own independent sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of reasonably  
possible changes to key assumptions. We specifically evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic  
on management’s future cash flow projections by comparison to external market economic forecasts.  
We performed independent sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of different COVID-19 scenarios  
on the Group’s impairment judgements. 

We assessed the appropriateness of management’s decision to provide additional disclosures about 
sensitivities in note 11 of the financial statements in relation to the North American Courseware, OPM, 
Other International and Brazil CGUs. More broadly, we considered whether the disclosures in note 11 
complied with IAS 36. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information130

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Pearson plc

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Returns provisioning (Group)

Refer to notes 3 and 24 in the consolidated  
financial statements. 

The Group has provided £86m (2019: £122m) for sales 
returns at 31 December 2020. The most significant 
exposure to potential returns within the Group arises 
in the US Higher Education Courseware business. 
Trends in the US market, including the growth of 
textbook rentals and the availability of free online 
content, continue to affect this business and have  
the potential to impact returns levels if shipping 
practices and arrangements with retailers are not 
managed in response to these trends.

Management provides for returns based on past 
experience by customer and channel. 

We assessed management’s evaluation of market trends and the Group’s responses and 
we considered whether management’s provisioning methodology continues to be 
appropriate in this context. 

We tested the returns provision calculations at 31 December 2020 and we agreed  
inputs including historical sales and actual returns experience to underlying records.  
We performed detailed testing over shipment and returns levels around the year-end  
and we evaluated whether these gave rise to an increased risk of future returns.  
We considered the reduction in the provision for sales returns in 2020 by reference  
to the related reduction in US Higher Education Courseware sales. 

We evaluated whether management had adopted methods and reached estimates for 
future returns that were supportable and appropriate. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work. 

Recoverability of pre-publication assets (Group)

Refer to note 20 in the consolidated  
financial statements. 

The Group holds £905m (2019: £870m) of  
pre-publication assets at 31 December 2020.  
Pre-publication assets represent direct costs  
incurred in the development of education platforms, 
programmes and titles prior to their public release. 

Given that these assets are amortised, management 
is required to undertake impairment trigger 
assessments at least annually or when triggering 
events occur. As a result of COVID-19, management 
has undertaken formal impairment tests of all 
material pre-publication assets in 2020.

Judgement is required to assess the recoverability  
of the carrying value of these assets. This judgement 
is further complicated by the transition to digital as 
the Group invests in new, less proven, inter-linked 
digital content and platforms.

We assessed the appropriateness of capitalisation and amortisation policies and we 
considered whether these policies had been consistently applied. We selected a sample  
of costs to test their magnitude and appropriateness for capitalisation. We evaluated the 
reasonableness of amortisation periods and profiles compared to sales forecasts and 
historical sales experience, including considering the impact of the transition towards 
digital products. 

We obtained management’s impairment models at 31 December 2020 and we tested their 
mathematical integrity. We validated the carrying amounts of the pre-publication assets 
subject to impairment testing to the underlying accounting records. We assessed the 
reasonableness of discount rates applied by management. We assessed forecast cash 
flows against historical experience and future expectations. 

We challenged the carrying value of certain pre-publication assets where products are  
yet to be launched, are less proven or where sales are lower than originally anticipated.  
We performed our own independent sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of 
reasonably possible changes to key assumptions. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information131

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Provisions for uncertain tax positions (Group)

Refer to notes 7 and 34 in the consolidated financial 
statements. 

The Group is subject to several tax regimes due  
to the geographical diversity of its businesses.  
At 31 December 2020, the Group held provisions  
for uncertain tax positions of £104m (2019: £152m). 
Management is required to exercise significant 
judgement in determining the appropriate amount  
to provide in respect of potential tax exposures  
and uncertain tax positions. The most significant 
provisions relate to US tax, transfer pricing and tax  
on prior year disposals. In addition, there are material 
unprovided tax exposures related to EU state aid and 
a Brazilian tax authority assessment related to 
goodwill amortisation deductions.

Changes in assumptions about the views that might 
be taken by tax authorities can materially impact the 
level of provisions recorded in the consolidated 
financial statements.

We engaged our tax specialists in the US and UK and we obtained an understanding of the 
Group’s tax strategy and risks. We assessed the tax impact of business developments in 
2020, including the disposal of the Group’s remaining stake in Penguin Random House  
and internal refinancing transactions. We recalculated the Group’s tax provisions and 
determined whether the treatments adopted were in line with the Group’s tax policies  
and had been applied consistently. We evaluated the key underlying assumptions, 
particularly in the US and UK. In making this evaluation, we considered the status of tax 
authority audits and enquiries. We considered the basis and support in particular for 
provisions not subject to tax audit in comparison with our experience of similar situations 
at comparable companies. We evaluated whether any risk of material misstatement 
existed for uncertain tax positions outside of the US and UK. 

We evaluated the consistency of management’s approach to establishing or changing prior 
provision estimates and we validated that changes in prior provisions reflected a change  
in facts and circumstances during 2020. Where provisions have not been established, 
including for material potential exposures like EU state aid and the assessment from the 
Brazilian tax authority, we evaluated the basis for management’s judgements, including an 
assessment of the treatment of similar exposures at comparable companies. We evaluated 
third party advice obtained by the Group as we independently formed our own view about 
the likelihood of these possible tax risks crystallising in future cash outflows. 

We noted that the assumptions and judgements required to formulate these provisions 
mean that the range of possible outcomes is broad. We evaluated the disclosures in  
notes 7 and 34 in relation to provisions for uncertain tax positions and we considered 
whether the disclosures were consistent with the underlying positions and with the 
requirements of IAS 1 and IAS 12. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information132

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Pearson plc

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

We revisited our audit risk assessment originally presented to the Group in July 2020 
as further information about the impact of COVID-19 on the Group’s operations and 
trading became available. We updated our planned audit responses to a number of 
key audit matters and areas of focus to address the financial reporting and audit 
implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our conclusions in respect of going concern are set out separately in this report.

With respect to management’s key accounting estimates, we evaluated and tested 
management’s reassessment of these estimates and the methodologies applied to 
arrive at these estimates. 

We performed procedures to assess any control implications arising from the  
change in management’s ways of working and we assessed the effectiveness of 
management’s key control operation compared to prior periods. 

We assessed our ability to execute the audit when operating under the restrictions  
of national lockdowns and related international travel restrictions. We implemented 
alternative communication and review protocols with management and with 
component auditors. We agreed with the Group an extension to the planned 
timetable for the sign-off of the Annual Report and audit completion in order to 
provide adequate time for management to make its assessment of the business  
and financial reporting impacts of COVID-19 and for our Group and component  
audit teams to complete the required audit procedures. With respect to inventory 
counts, we attended certain counts virtually using a live video feed and we were able 
to obtain the level of evidence and support that we required. 

We reviewed management’s disclosures in relation to the impact of COVID-19 in  
the Annual Report, considering whether the disclosures were consistent with the 
Group’s scenario planning and with actual trading experience. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from  
our work.

Impact of COVID-19 (Group and company)

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on  
the operations and recent trading performance of the 
Group. The extent of the impact of the pandemic on future 
trading performance is difficult to predict and will vary 
across the Group’s portfolio of businesses. Therefore, 
there is inherent uncertainty in determining the impact  
of the pandemic on certain aspects of the consolidated  
and company financial statements. 

The financial statement areas that were most significantly 
impacted by COVID-19 involve those accounting estimates 
that are reliant on management’s future budgets and 
forecasts, including impairment assessments for  
goodwill in the consolidated financial statements and for 
investments in subsidiary undertakings in the company 
financial statements, which have been addressed in 
separate key audit matters in this report, and going 
concern. In addition, management has reassessed a 
number of other accounting estimates in order to assess 
the impact of COVID-19, including inventory obsolescence, 
expected credit losses, sales returns, recoverability of 
product development and deferred tax assets, pension 
plan asset valuations and impairment trigger assessments 
for intangible assets, right-of-use property assets and  
sub-lease receivables.

We focused on the impact of COVID-19 on the preparation 
of the consolidated and company financial statements  
as its impact is significant and widespread, both in terms  
of the impact on a range of the Group’s accounting 
judgements and estimates and in terms of related 
disclosures in the Annual Report.

In addition, management’s ways of working, including the 
operation of key financial controls, have been impacted by 
COVID-19 as a result of employees working remotely and 
using technology-enabled working practices. There has 
also been an impact on our audit working practices as 
certain audit activities that have historically been 
undertaken in person, including inventory counts and 
component auditor oversight procedures, have had to  
be undertaken remotely.

Risk of fraud in revenue recognition (Group)

Refer to note 3 in the consolidated financial statements. 

Certain of the Group’s businesses in the US and UK enter 
into contracts that span year-end, where revenue is 
recognised using estimated percentage of completion 
based on costs. These include contracts to design,  
develop and deliver testing and accreditation services. 
These contracts generate material deferred revenue 
balances and changes to the underlying assumptions or 
estimation calculations could have a material effect on  
the consolidated financial statements. 

For a selection of the larger and more judgemental contracts, we read the contracts 
and we assessed the accounting methodologies applied to calculate the proportion  
of revenue being recognised in 2020. We considered whether management’s revenue 
recognition practices are in accordance with Group policies and related accounting 
standards and have been consistently applied. 

We tested costs incurred to date and management’s estimates of forecast costs  
and revenues by reference to historical experience and current contract status.  
We recalculated management’s percentage of completion estimates and we 
performed look-back tests to assess management’s historical accuracy of  
forecasting for these types of arrangement. 

In addition, we tested revenue recognised around year-end to ensure that it was 
recognised in the proper period, focusing on cut-off of shipments at the Group’s 
major shipping locations, and we performed manual journals testing focusing on 
unusual or unexpected entries to revenue. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from  
our work. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information133

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Carrying value of investments in subsidiaries (company)

We evaluated management’s assessment whether any indicators of impairment existed  
by comparing the carrying values of investments in subsidiaries with their net assets at  
31 December 2020. 

For investments where the net assets were lower than the carrying values, we assessed 
their recoverable value by reference to the value in use of the investments compared  
to their carrying values at 31 December 2020. Where applicable, we verified that the 
recoverable values of investments were consistent with the recoverable values of the 
related CGUs tested for goodwill impairment purposes, leveraging the audit work 
undertaken as part of the Group audit. 

We separately evaluated the difference between the carrying value of the company’s 
investments in subsidiaries and the Group’s market capitalisation. 

Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work. 

Refer to note 2 in the company financial statements. 

The company holds investments in subsidiaries 
amounting to £6,619m (2019: £6,664m) at 31 
December 2020. 

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at  
cost less provision for impairment in the company 
balance sheet. Investments are tested for 
impairment if impairment indicators exist. If such 
indicators exist, the recoverable amounts of 
investments in subsidiaries are estimated in order  
to determine the extent of the impairment loss,  
if any. Any such impairment loss is recognised in  
the income statement. 

The impairment assessment was identified as a  
key audit matter given the size of the underlying 
investment carrying values and the differential to the 
Group’s market capitalisation. Further impairment 
indicators were identified in connection with certain 
of the investments in subsidiaries due to the carrying 
value of investments exceeding their net assets. The 
assessment required the application of management 
judgement, particularly in determining whether any 
impairment indicators have arisen that trigger the 
need for an impairment assessment and in assessing 
whether the carrying value of each investment  
can be supported by the recoverable amount. 
Changes to these judgements and estimates  
could have a material impact on the company 
financial statements.

How we tailored the audit scope

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed 
enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements 
as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the 
company, the accounting processes and controls and the industry  
in which they operate.

The consolidated financial statements are a consolidation of 521 
reporting units, each of which is considered to be a component.  
We identified three components in the UK and US that required a  
full scope audit due to their size. Audit procedures over specific 
financial statement line items were performed at a further five 
components in the UK, US and Brazil to achieve appropriate audit 
coverage. In addition, we have undertaken certain unpredictable audit 
procedures on a rotational basis covering components that have not 
historically been included in Group audit scope.

In establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we determined 
the type of work that needed to be performed at the components by 
us, as the Group engagement team, or by component auditors within 
PwC UK and from other PwC network firms operating under our 
instruction. Where the work was performed by component auditors, 
we determined the level of involvement we needed to have in the audit 
work at those reporting units to be able to conclude whether sufficient 
appropriate audit evidence had been obtained as a basis for our 
opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. 

We performed full scope audits in respect of NCS Pearson 
(encompassing the US businesses which form part of the Global 
Assessment segment), Pearson Education US (encompassing the  
US business which forms part of the North American Courseware 
segment) and Pearson Education UK (forming part of the  
International segment).

We performed specified procedures at a further five components 
within the North American Courseware, Global Online Learning  
and International segments and across the Enabling Functions over 
financial statement line items including revenue, trade and other 
receivables, deferred income, cash, intangible assets and amortisation, 
accruals, provisions for returns, product development and 
amortisation, fixed assets and depreciation, cost of sales and  
operating expenses. This ensured that sufficient and appropriate  
audit procedures were performed to achieve sufficient coverage over 
these financial statement line items. 

In addition to instructing and reviewing the reporting from our 
component audit teams, we conducted file reviews and participated  
in key meetings with local management. We also had regular dialogue 
with component teams throughout the year. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information134

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Pearson plc

The Group consolidation, financial statement disclosures and 
corporate functions were audited by the Group engagement team.  
This included our work over taxation, goodwill and acquired intangible 
assets, post-retirement benefits and major transactions. Taken 
together, the components and corporate functions where we 
conducted audit procedures accounted for approximately 73% of  
the Group’s revenue, 73% of the Group’s statutory profit before tax 
and 72% of the Group’s adjusted profit before tax. This provided the 
evidence we needed for our opinion on the consolidated financial 
statements taken as a whole. This was before considering the 
contribution to our audit evidence from performing audit work at  
the Group level, including disaggregated analytical review procedures, 
which covered certain of the Group’s smaller and lower risk 
components that were not directly included in our Group audit scope. 

Our audit of the company financial statements was undertaken in  
the UK and included substantive procedures of all material balances 
and transactions.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. 
We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together 
with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of 
our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures  
on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in 
evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in 
aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for 
the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Overall 
materiality

How we 
determined it

Rationale for 
benchmark 
applied

Consolidated financial statements Company financial statements

£19m (2019: £27m)

£45m (2019: £49m)

Approximately 1% of  
net assets

Pearson plc is the ultimate 
parent company which holds 
the Group’s investments. 
Therefore, the entity is not 
in itself profit-oriented. 
The strength of the balance 
sheet is the key measure  
of financial health that is 
important to shareholders, 
since the primary concern for 
the company is the payment 
of dividends. We therefore 
consider net assets to be an 
appropriate benchmark.

Certain account balances 
were included in scope for 
the audit of the consolidated 
financial statements and 
were therefore audited  
to a materiality level set 
below overall materiality 
established for the  
Group audit. However,  
we determined that the 
company did not require 
a full scope audit of its 
complete financial 
information for the 
purposes of the audit  
of the consolidated  
financial statements.

Approximately 5% of the 
three year average of the 
Group’s adjusted profit 
before tax

The Group’s principal 
measure of performance is 
adjusted operating profit, 
which excludes one-off gains 
and losses, costs of major 
restructuring and  
acquired intangible asset 
amortisation and 
impairment charges,  
in order to present results 
from operating activities  
on a consistent basis.  
We have also excluded the 
results of Penguin Random 
House from this benchmark 
for each of the three years 
following its disposal.  
We have taken this measure 
into account in determining 
our materiality as it is the 
metric against which the 
performance of the Group 
is most commonly assessed 
by management and 
reported to shareholders. 
From adjusted operating 
profit, we deducted net 
finance costs.

Given the volatility in 
profitability in 2020 as a 
result of COVID-19, we based 
our materiality calculation 
on a three year average  
of the Group’s adjusted 
profit before tax.

For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a 
materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. The range  
of materiality allocated across components was approximately £3m  
to £16m. 

We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low  
level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected 
misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use 
performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and  
the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of 
transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. 
Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting 
to £14m for the consolidated financial statements and £34m for the 
company financial statements.

In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number 
of factors, including the history of misstatements, risk assessment and 
aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls, concluding that an 
amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information135

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them 
misstatements identified during our audit above £2m for the Group 
and company audits (2019: £2m) as well as misstatements below those 
amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Conclusions relating to going concern

Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group’s and the 
company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting included:

  Evaluation of management’s base case and downside case scenarios, 
understanding and evaluating the key assumptions, including 
assumptions related to COVID-19;

  Validation that the cash flow forecasts used to support 
management’s impairment, going concern and viability assessments 
were consistent;

  Assessment of the historical accuracy and reasonableness of 
management’s forecasting; 

  Consideration of the Group’s available financing and debt  
maturity profile;

  Testing of the mathematical integrity of management’s  
liquidity headroom, covenant compliance, sensitivity and  
stress testing calculations; 

consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with 
the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an 
apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are 
required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a 
material misstatement of the financial statements or a material 
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have 
performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this 
other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing 
to report based on these responsibilities.

With respect to the Strategic Report and Governance Report, we also 
considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 
2006 have been included.

Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the 
Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and 
matters as described below.

Strategic Report and Governance Report

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the 
audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Governance 
Report for the year ended 31 December 2020 is consistent with the 
financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.

  Assessment of the reasonableness of management’s planned or 
potential mitigating actions; and

  Review of the related disclosures in the Annual Report.

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and 
company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit,  
we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report 
and Governance Report.

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified  
any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, 
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group’s 
and the company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period  
of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are 
authorised for issue.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the 
Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. 

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, 
this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and the company’s 
ability to continue as a going concern.

Directors’ Remuneration

In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to  
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.

Corporate governance statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statements in 
relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the 
corporate governance statement relating to the company’s compliance 
with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified  
for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the 
corporate governance statement as other information are described in 
the reporting on other information section of this report.

In relation to the company’s reporting on how they have applied the  
UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or 
draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial 
statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to 
adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded 
that each of the following elements of the corporate governance 
statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and 
our knowledge obtained during the audit and we have nothing material 
to add or draw attention to in relation to:

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with 
respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of  
this report.

Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual 
Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report 
thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information.  
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other 
information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion  
or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report,  
any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our 
responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,  

  The Directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust 
assessment of the emerging and principal risks;

  The disclosures in the Annual Report and Accounts that describe 
those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify 
emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed 
or mitigated;

  The Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether 
they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting in preparing them and their identification of any material 
uncertainties to the Group’s and company’s ability to continue to do 
so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval 
of the financial statements;

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information136

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Pearson plc

  The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s  
and company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and  
why the period is appropriate; and

  The Directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, 
including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary 
qualifications or assumptions.

Our review of the Directors’ statement regarding the longer-term 
viability of the Group was substantially less in scope than an audit  
and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the Directors’ 
process supporting their statement; checking that the statement  
is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is 
consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and 
understanding of the Group and company and their environment 
obtained in the course of the audit.

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we 
have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate 
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial 
statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

  The Directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken 
as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the 
information necessary for the members to assess the Group’s and 
company’s position, performance, business model and strategy;

  The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of 
effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and

includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, 
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with  
ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered 
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be 
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the 
basis of these financial statements.

Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of  
certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing 
techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number  
of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will 
often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or 
risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable 
us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample  
is selected.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of  
the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:  
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms  
part of our auditors’ report.

Use of this report

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for 
the company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of 
Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do 
not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any 
other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or 
into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our 
prior consent in writing.

  The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the  
Audit Committee.

Other required reporting

Companies Act 2006 exception reporting

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report 
when the Directors’ statement relating to the company’s compliance 
with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant 
provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by 
the auditors.

Responsibilities for the financial statements and  
the audit

Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities, 
the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial 
statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for  
being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The Directors are also 
responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary  
to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from 
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you if,  
in our opinion:

  we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require 
for our audit; or

  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company or 
returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches 
not visited by us; or

  certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are 
not made; or

  the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration 
Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting 
records and returns.

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Appointment

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for 
assessing the Group’s and the company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and 
using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either 
intend to liquidate the Group or the company or to cease operations or 
have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were 
appointed by the members on 6 February 1996 to audit the financial 
statements for the year ended 31 December 1996 and subsequent 
financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is  
25 years, covering the years ended 31 December 1996 to  
31 December 2020.

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the  
financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that 

Giles Hannam (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 
London

15 March 2021

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information137

Consolidated income statement

Year ended 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Continuing operations

Sales

Cost of goods sold

Gross profit

Operating expenses

Other net gains and losses

Share of results of joint ventures and associates

Operating profit

Finance costs

Finance income

Profit before tax

Income tax

Profit for the year

Attributable to:

Equity holders of the company

Non-controlling interest

Earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the company during the year 
(expressed in pence per share)

– basic

– diluted

Notes

2020

2019

2

4

4

4

12

2

6

6

7

8

8

3,397

(1,767)

1,630

(1,402)

178

5

411

(107)

50

354

(44)

310

310

–

3,869

(1,858)

2,011

(1,806)

16

54

275

(84)

41

232

34

266

264

2

41.0p

41.0p

34.0p

34.0p

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information138

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

Year ended 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Profit for the year

Items that may be reclassified to the income statement

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign operations – Group

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign operations – associates

Currency translation adjustment disposed

Attributable tax

Items that are not reclassified to the income statement

Fair value gain on other financial assets 

Attributable tax

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – Group

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – associates

Attributable tax

Other comprehensive expense for the year

Total comprehensive income for the year

Attributable to:

Equity holders of the company

Non-controlling interest

Notes

7

7

25

7

29

2020

310

(109)

–

(70)

(13)

14

(6)

(23)

–

2

(205)

105

105

–

2019

266

(113)

(2)

4

5

20

(4)

(145)

(4)

22

(217)

49

47

2

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information139

Consolidated balance sheet

As at 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Assets

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

Intangible assets

Investments in joint ventures and associates

Deferred income tax assets

Financial assets – derivative financial instruments

Retirement benefit assets

Other financial assets

Trade and other receivables

Current assets

Intangible assets – pre-publication

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets – derivative financial instruments

Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts)

Assets classified as held for sale

Total assets

Liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Financial liabilities – derivative financial instruments

Deferred income tax liabilities

Retirement benefit obligations

Provisions for other liabilities and charges

Other liabilities

Notes

2020

2019

10

11

12

13

16

25

15

22

20

21

22

16

17

32

18

16

13

25

23

24

515

2,742

6

32

45

410

138

223

618

2,900

7

59

29

429

122

313

4,111

4,477

905

129

1,118

18

1,097

3,267

870

169

1,275

25

437

2,776

73

397

7,451

7,650

(1,397)

(1,572)

(40)

(62)

(85)

(8)

(80)

(24)

(48)

(92)

(13)

(86)

(1,672)

(1,835)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information140

Consolidated balance sheet continued
As at 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Current liabilities

Trade and other liabilities

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Financial liabilities – derivative financial instruments

Current income tax liabilities

Provisions for other liabilities and charges

Liabilities classified as held for sale

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Share capital

Share premium

Treasury shares

Capital redemption reserve

Fair value reserve

Translation reserve

Retained earnings

Total equity attributable to equity holders of the company

Non-controlling interest

Total equity

Notes

2020

2019

24

18

16

23

32

27

27

28

(1,196)

(254)

(12)

(84)

(25)

(1,278)

(92)

(15)

(55)

(52)

(1,571)

(1,492)

(74)

–

(3,317)

4,134

188

2,620

(7)

18

53

388

865

4,125

9

4,134

(3,327)

4,323

195

2,614

(24)

11

39

567

911

4,313

10

4,323

These financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 15 March 2021 and signed on its behalf by

Sally Johnson 
Chief Financial Officer

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information141

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

Year ended 31 December 2020

Equity attributable to equity holders of the company

Share 
capital

Share 
premium

Treasury 
shares

Capital 
redemption 
reserve

195

2,614

(24)

11

Fair value 
reserve

Translation 
reserve

Retained 
earnings

567

–

911

310

Total

4,313

310

(179)

(40)

(205)

All figures in £ millions

At 1 January 2020

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive  
income/(expense)

Total comprehensive  
income/(expense)

Equity-settled transactions

Tax on equity-settled transactions

Issue of ordinary shares under  
share option schemes

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

Dividends

All figures in £ millions

At 1 January 2019

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive  
income/(expense)

Total comprehensive  
income/(expense)

Equity-settled transactions

Tax on equity-settled transactions

Issue of ordinary shares under  
share option schemes

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

Dividends

–

–

–

–

–

–

(7)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

6

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(6)

23

–

(7)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(52)

61

–

(24)

39

–

14

14

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

19

–

20

20

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(179)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(111)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

270

29

–

–

105

29

–

6

(176)

(176)

–

(23)

(146)

865

(6)

–

(146)

4,125

Non-
controlling 
interest

10

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(1)

9

Non-
controlling 
interest

9

2

–

2

–

–

–

–

–

–

Total 
equity

4,323

310

(205)

105

29

–

6

(176)

(6)

–

(147)

4,134

Total 
equity

4,447

266

(217)

49

25

(5)

7

–

(52)

–

(148)

4,323

47

25

(5)

7

–

(52)

–

138

25

(5)

–

–

–

(61)

(147)

911

(147)

4,313

(1)

10

Share 
capital

Share 
premium

Treasury 
shares

Capital 
redemption 
reserve

195

2,607

(33)

11

Equity attributable to equity holders of the company

Fair value 
reserve

Translation 
reserve

Retained 
earnings

678

–

961

264

Total

4,438

264

(111)

(126)

(217)

At 31 December 2019

195

2,614

11

39

567

The capital redemption reserve reflects the nominal value of shares cancelled in the Group’s share buyback programme. The fair value reserve 
arises on revaluation of other financial assets. The translation reserve includes exchange differences arising from the translation of the net 
investment in foreign operations and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments. 

At 31 December 2020

188

2,620

18

53

388

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information142

Consolidated cash flow statement

Year ended 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Cash flows from operating activities

Net cash generated from operations

Interest paid

Tax received/(paid)

Net cash generated from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired

Additional capital invested in associates

Purchase of investments

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

Purchase of intangible assets

Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash disposed

Proceeds from sale of joint ventures and associates

Proceeds from sale of investments

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

Lease receivables repaid including disposals 

Loans repaid by/(advanced to) related parties

Interest received

Investment income

Dividends from joint ventures and associates

Net cash generated from/(used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Proceeds from borrowings

Repayment of borrowings

Repayment of lease liabilities

Dividends paid to company’s shareholders

Dividends paid to non-controlling interest

Net cash used in financing activities

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Notes

2020

2019

33

30

31

31

27

27

28

9

17

450

(63)

2

389

(6)

–

(6)

(53)

(81)

100

531

–

–

41

48

13

–

4

480

(81)

(30)

369

(45)

(40)

(12)

(55)

(138)

(101)

–

5

1

26

(49)

17

2

64

591

(325)

6

(176)

(6)

346

(230)

(92)

(146)

(1)

(299)

(2)

679

434

1,113

7

–

(52)

230

(48)

(91)

(147)

(1)

(102)

(33)

(91)

525

434

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information143

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

General information
Pearson plc (‘the company’), its subsidiaries and associates  
(together ‘the Group’) are international businesses covering 
educational courseware, assessments and services.

The company is a public limited company incorporated and  
domiciled in England. The address of its registered office is  
80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL.

The company has its primary listing on the London Stock Exchange  
and is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

These consolidated financial statements were approved for issue  
by the Board of Directors on 15 March 2021.

1a. Accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these 
consolidated financial statements are set out below.

Basis of preparation

These consolidated financial statements, and the company financial 
statements, have been prepared on the going concern basis  
(see note 1c) and in accordance with international accounting 
standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies  
Act 2006. In addition, the consolidated financial statements have  
been prepared in accordance with international financial reporting 
standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it 
applies in the European Union (‘EU-adopted IFRS’). The consolidated 
financial statements have also been prepared in accordance with  
the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by  
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). There is no 
difference between IFRS in conformity with the Companies Act 2006, 
the EU-adopted IFRS and IASB issued IFRS.

These consolidated financial statements, and the company financial 
statements, have been prepared under the historical cost convention 
as modified by the revaluation of financial assets and liabilities 
(including derivative financial instruments) at fair value. 

These accounting policies have been consistently applied to all years 
presented, unless otherwise stated. 

1. Interpretations and amendments to published standards  
effective 2020 – No new standards were adopted in 2020.

A number of other new pronouncements are effective from  
1 January 2020 but they do not have a material impact on the 
consolidated financial statements, or the company financial 
statements. Additional disclosure has been given where relevant.  
See note 1b for details on the early adoption of amendments to  
IFRS 16 ‘Leases’.

2. Standards, interpretations and amendments to published standards 
that are not yet effective – A number of other new standards and 
amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual 
periods beginning after 1 January 2021, and have not been applied in 
preparing these financial statements. None of these is expected to 
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements,  
or the company financial statements.

3. Critical accounting assumptions and judgements – The preparation 
of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of 
certain critical accounting assumptions and estimates. It also requires 
management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the 
Group’s accounting policies. 

All assumptions and estimates constitute management’s best 
judgement at the date of the financial statements, however, in the 
future, actual experience may deviate from these estimates  
and assumptions. 

The areas requiring a higher degree of judgement or complexity,  
or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the 
consolidated financial statements are:

  Intangible assets: Goodwill
  Intangible assets: Pre-publication assets 
  Taxation 
  Revenue: Provisions for returns 
  Employee benefits: Pensions 

The valuation of the other receivable which arose on the disposal  
of the US K-12 business is no longer considered to be an area of key 
judgement and estimation due to repayments received during 2020.

They key judgements and key areas of estimation are set out below,  
as well as in the relevant accounting policies and in the notes to the 
accounts where appropriate. 

K J Key judgements

  The application of tax legislation in relation to provisions for 
uncertain tax positions (see notes 7 and 34).

  Whether the Group will be eligible to receive the surplus 
associated with the UK Group Pension Plan in recognising a 
pension asset (see note 25).

K E Key areas of estimation

  The recoverability of goodwill balances. Key assumptions used in 
goodwill impairment testing are discount rates, perpetuity growth 
rates, forecast sales growth rates and forecast operating profits. 
See note 11 for further details.

  The recoverability of prepublication assets and in particular the 
assessment of the useful economic lives of pre-publication assets. 
The key assumption is the estimate of future potential sales.  
See note 20 for further details.

  The level of provisions required in relation to uncertain tax 
positions is complex and each matter is separately assessed.  
The estimation of future settlement amounts is based on a 
number of factors including the status of the unresolved matter, 
clarity of legislation, range of possible outcomes and the statute  
of limitations. See notes 7 and 34 for further details.

  The level of provisions required for anticipated returns is 
estimated based on historical experiences, customer buying 
patterns and retailer behaviours including stock levels.  
See note 3 for further details. 

  The determination of the pension cost and defined benefit 
obligation of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes 
depends on the selection of certain assumptions, which include 
the discount rate, inflation rate, salary growth and longevity.  
See note 25 for further details.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information144

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

1a. Accounting policies continued

Basis of preparation continued

The Group has assessed the impact of the uncertainty presented  
by the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial statements, specifically 
considering the impact on key judgements and significant estimates 
along with other areas of increased risk as follows: 

  Recoverable value of right of use assets and investment in  
finance lease receivable balances
  Financial instruments in particular counterparty risk and  
hedge effectiveness
  Working capital provisions including expected credit losses on  
trade and other debtors and inventory obsolescence

No material accounting impacts relating to the areas assessed  
above were recognised in the year. The Group will continue to  
monitor these areas of increased judgement, estimation and risk  
for material changes.

Consolidation

1. Business combinations – The acquisition method of accounting is 
used to account for business combinations.

The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is  
the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the 
equity interest issued by the Group. The consideration transferred 
includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a 
contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs are 
expensed as incurred in the operating expenses line of the income 
statement. Identifiable assets acquired and identifiable liabilities and 
contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured 
initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The determination  
of fair values often requires significant judgements and the use of 
estimates, and, for material acquisitions, the fair value of the acquired 
intangible assets is determined by an independent valuer. The excess 
of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling 
interest in the acquiree and the acquisition date fair value of any 
previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the 
identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill (see note 30).

See the ‘Intangible assets’ policy for the accounting policy on goodwill. 
If this is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary 
acquired, in the case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognised 
directly in the income statement.

On an acquisition-by-acquisition basis, the Group recognises  
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or  
at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the  
acquiree’s net assets.

IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’ has not been applied retrospectively  
to business combinations before the date of transition to IFRS.

Management exercises judgement in determining the classification  
of its investments in its businesses, in line with the following:

2. Subsidiaries – Subsidiaries are entities over which the Group has 
control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to,  
or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity 
and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the 
entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which 
control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from  
the date that control ceases.

3. Transactions with non-controlling interests – Transactions with 
non-controlling interests that do not result in loss of control are 

accounted for as equity transactions, that is, as transactions with  
the owners in their capacity as owners. Any surplus or deficit arising 
from disposals to a non-controlling interest is recorded in equity.  
For purchases from a non-controlling interest, the difference between 
consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying 
value of the subsidiary is recorded in equity.

4. Joint ventures and associates – Joint ventures are entities in which 
the Group holds an interest on a long-term basis and has rights to the 
net assets through contractually agreed sharing of control. Associates 
are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not  
the power to control the financial and operating policies, generally 
accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting 
rights. Ownership percentage is likely to be the key indicator of 
investment classification; however, other factors, such as Board 
representation, may also affect the accounting classification. 
Judgement is required to assess all of the qualitative and quantitative 
factors which may indicate that the Group does, or does not, have 
significant influence over an investment. Investments in joint ventures 
and associates are accounted for by the equity method and are initially 
recognised at the fair value of consideration transferred.

The Group’s share of its joint ventures’ and associates’ post-acquisition 
profits or losses is recognised in the income statement and its share  
of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognised in reserves.

The Group’s share of its joint ventures’ and associates’ results is 
recognised as a component of operating profit as these operations 
form part of the core publishing business of the Group and are an 
integral part of existing wholly-owned businesses. The cumulative 
post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount 
of the investment. When the Group’s share of losses in a joint venture 
or associate equals or exceeds its interest in the joint venture or 
associate, the Group does not recognise further losses unless the 
Group has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the 
joint venture or associate.

Unrealised gains and losses on transactions between the Group and  
its joint ventures and associates are eliminated to the extent of the 
Group’s interest in these entities. 

5. Contribution of a subsidiary to an associate or joint venture –  
The gain or loss resulting from the contribution or sale of a subsidiary 
to an associate or a joint venture is recognised in full. Where such 
transactions do not involve cash consideration, significant judgements 
and estimates are used in determining the fair values of the 
consideration received. 

Foreign currency translation

1. Functional and presentation currency – Items included in the 
financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured  
using the currency of the primary economic environment in which  
the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated  
financial statements are presented in sterling, which is the company’s 
functional and presentation currency.

2. Transactions and balances – Foreign currency transactions are 
translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates 
prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains  
and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from 
the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the 
income statement, except when deferred in equity as qualifying net 
investment hedges.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information145

1a. Accounting policies continued

Foreign currency translation continued

3. Group companies – The results and financial position of all Group 
companies that have a functional currency different from the 
presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency  
as follows:

i) 

 Assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date  
of the balance sheet

ii) 

 Income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates

iii) 

 All resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate 
component of equity.

On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation  
of the net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other 
currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are 
taken to shareholders’ equity. The Group treats specific inter-company 
loan balances, which are not intended to be repaid in the foreseeable 
future, as part of its net investment. When a foreign operation is sold, 
such exchange differences are recognised in the income statement as 
part of the gain or loss on sale.

The principal overseas currency for the Group is the US dollar.  
The average rate for the year against sterling was $1.28 (2019: $1.28) 
and the year-end rate was $1.37 (2019: $1.32).

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less 
depreciation. Cost includes the original purchase price of the asset and 
the costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition for 
intended use. Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is 
calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost less their 
residual values over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Buildings (freehold):

20–50 years

Buildings (leasehold):

over the period of the lease 

Plant and equipment:

3–10 years

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted 
if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. 

The carrying value of an asset is written down to its recoverable 
amount if the carrying value of the asset is greater than its estimated 
recoverable amount.

Intangible assets

1. Goodwill – For the acquisition of subsidiaries made on or after  
1 January 2010, goodwill represents the excess of the consideration 
transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree 
and the acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in  
the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. 
For the acquisition of subsidiaries made from the date of transition to 
IFRS to 31 December 2009, goodwill represents the excess of the cost 
of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net 
identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries  
is included in intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisition of associates 
and joint ventures represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition 
over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets 
acquired. Goodwill on acquisitions of associates and joint ventures is 
included in investments in associates and joint ventures.

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment and carried at  
cost less accumulated impairment losses. An impairment loss is 
recognised to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds  
the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of  
fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. These calculations 
require the use of estimates in respect of forecast cash flows and 
discount rates and significant management judgement in respect  
of cash-generating unit (CGU) and cost allocation; impairment is a  
key source of estimation uncertainty and has a significant risk of 
resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amount of relevant 
assets within the next financial year. A summary of these assets by  
CGU and a description of the key assumptions and sensitivities is 
included in note 11.

Goodwill is allocated to aggregated CGUs for the purpose of 
impairment testing. The allocation is made to those aggregated  
CGUs that are expected to benefit from the business combination  
in which the goodwill arose.

Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying 
amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold.

2. Acquired software – Software separately acquired for internal  
use is capitalised at cost. Software acquired in material business 
combinations is capitalised at its fair value as determined by an 
independent valuer. Acquired software is amortised on a straight-line 
basis over its estimated useful life of between three and eight years.

3. Internally developed software – Internal and external costs incurred 
during the preliminary stage of developing computer software for 
internal use are expensed as incurred. Internal and external costs 
incurred to develop computer software for internal use during the 
application development stage are capitalised if the Group expects 
economic benefits from the development. Capitalisation in the 
application development stage begins once the Group can reliably 
measure the expenditure attributable to the software development 
and has demonstrated its intention to complete and use the software. 
Internally developed software is amortised on a straight-line basis  
over its estimated useful life of between three and ten years.

4. Acquired intangible assets – Acquired intangible assets include 
customer lists, contracts and relationships, trademarks and brands, 
publishing rights, content, technology and software rights. These 
assets are capitalised on acquisition at cost and included in intangible 
assets. Intangible assets acquired in material business combinations 
are capitalised at their fair value as determined by an independent 
valuer. Intangible assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives 
of between two and 20 years, using an amortisation method that 
reflects the pattern of their consumption.

5. Pre-publication assets – Pre-publication assets represent direct  
costs incurred in the development of educational programmes and 
titles prior to their publication. These costs are recognised as current 
intangible assets where the title will generate probable future 
economic benefits and costs can be measured reliably. 

Pre-publication assets relating to content are amortised upon 
publication of the title over estimated economic lives of 7 years or  
less, being an estimate of the expected operating lifecycle of the title, 
with a higher proportion of the amortisation taken in the earlier years. 
Pre-publication assets relating to product platforms are amortised 
over ten years or less being an estimate of the expected useful life.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information146

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

1a. Accounting policies continued

Intangible assets continued

The assessment of the useful economic life and the recoverability  
of pre-publication assets involves a significant degree of judgement 
based on historical trends and management estimation of future 
potential sales. An incorrect amortisation profile could result in  
excess amounts being carried forward as intangible assets that  
would otherwise have been written off to the income statement in  
an earlier period.

Pre-publication assets are assessed for impairment triggers on an 
annual basis or when triggering events occur. The carrying amount  
of pre-publication assets is set out in note 20.

The investment in pre-publication assets has been disclosed as  
part of cash generated from operations in the cash flow statement  
(see note 33).

Other financial assets

Other financial assets are non-derivative financial assets classified and 
measured at estimated fair value. 

Marketable securities and cash deposits with maturities of greater than 
three months are classified and subsequently measured at fair value 
through profit and loss. 

They are remeasured at each balance sheet date by using market data 
and the use of established valuation techniques. Any movement in the 
fair value is immediately recognised in finance income or finance costs 
in the income statement.

Investments in the equity instruments of other entities are  
classified and subsequently measured at fair value through other 
comprehensive income. Changes in fair value are recorded in equity in 
the fair value reserve via other comprehensive income. On subsequent 
disposal of the asset, the net fair value gains or losses are reclassified 
from the fair value reserve to retained earnings. Any dividends 
received from equity investments classified as fair value through  
other comprehensive income are recognised in the income statement 
unless they represent a return of capital. 

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value.  
Cost is determined using the weighted average method or an 
approximation thereof, such as the first in first out (FIFO) method.  
The cost of finished goods and work in progress comprises raw 
materials, direct labour, other direct costs and related production 
overheads. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the 
ordinary course of business, less estimated costs necessary to make 
the sale. Provisions are made for slow-moving and obsolete stock.

Royalty advances

Advances of royalties to authors are included within trade and other 
receivables when the advance is paid less any provision required to 
adjust the advance to its net realisable value. The realisable value of 
royalty advances relies on a degree of management estimation in 
determining the profitability of individual author contracts. If the 
estimated realisable value of author contracts is overstated, this will 
have an adverse effect on operating profits as these excess amounts 
will be written off.

The recoverability of royalty advances is based upon an annual detailed 
management review of the age of the advance, the future sales 
projections for new authors and prior sales history of repeat authors.

The royalty advance is expensed at the contracted or effective royalty 
rate as the related revenues are earned. Royalty advances which will be 
consumed within one year are held in current assets. Royalty advances 
which will be consumed after one year are held in non-current assets.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement include cash in 
hand, deposits held on call with banks, other short-term highly liquid 
investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank 
overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are included in borrowings in current 
liabilities in the balance sheet.

Short-term deposits and marketable securities with maturities of 
greater than three months do not qualify as cash and cash equivalents 
and are reported as financial assets. Movements on these financial 
assets are classified as cash flows from financing activities in the  
cash flow statement where these amounts are used to offset the 
borrowings of the Group or as cash flows from investing activities 
where these amounts are held to generate an investment return.

Share capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new  
shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax,  
from the proceeds.

Where any Group company purchases the company’s equity share 
capital (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including any directly 
attributable incremental costs, net of income taxes, is deducted from 
equity attributable to the company’s equity holders until the shares  
are cancelled, reissued or disposed of. Where such shares are 
subsequently sold or reissued, any consideration received, net of  
any directly attributable transaction costs and the related income  
tax effects, is included in equity attributable to the company’s  
equity holders.

Ordinary shares purchased under a buyback programme are cancelled 
and the nominal value of the shares is transferred to a capital 
redemption reserve.

Borrowings

Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, which is proceeds 
received net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are 
subsequently stated at amortised cost with any difference between 
the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value being 
recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings 
using the effective interest method. Accrued interest is included as  
part of borrowings. 

Where a debt instrument is in a fair value hedging relationship,  
an adjustment is made to its carrying value in the income statement  
to reflect the hedged risk. 

Where a debt instrument is in a net investment hedge relationship 
gains and losses on the effective portion of the hedge are recognised  
in other comprehensive income. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information147

1a. Accounting policies continued

Derivative financial instruments

Derivatives are recognised at fair value and remeasured at each 
balance sheet date. The fair value of derivatives is determined by  
using market data and the use of established estimation techniques 
such as discounted cash flow and option valuation models. 

For derivatives in a hedge relationship, the currency basis spread  
is excluded from the designation as a hedging instrument.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognised immediately in 
finance income or costs. However, derivatives relating to borrowings 
and certain foreign exchange contracts are designated as part of a 
hedging transaction. 

The accounting treatment is summarised as follows:

Typical reason  
for designation

Net investment hedge

The derivative creates  
a foreign currency 
liability which is used  
to hedge changes in the 
value of a subsidiary 
which transacts in  
that currency.

Fair value hedges

The derivative 
transforms the interest 
profile on debt from 
fixed rate to floating rate. 
Changes in the value of 
the debt as a result of 
changes in interest rates 
and foreign exchange 
rates are offset by equal 
and opposite changes  
in the value of the 
derivative. When the 
Group’s debt is swapped 
to floating rates, the 
contracts used are 
designated as fair  
value hedges.

Reporting of gains  
and losses on effective  
portion of the hedge

Reporting of gains and 
losses on disposal

On disposal, the 
accumulated value  
of gains and losses 
reported in other 
comprehensive income 
is transferred to the 
income statement.

If the debt and 
derivative are disposed 
of, the value of the 
derivative and the  
debt (including the fair 
value adjustment)  
are reset to zero.  
Any resultant gain or 
loss is recognised in  
finance income or 
finance costs.

Recognised in other 
comprehensive 
income.

Gains and losses  
on the derivative  
are reported in finance 
income or finance 
costs. However, an 
equal and opposite 
change is made to  
the carrying value of 
the debt (a ‘fair value 
adjustment’) with the 
benefit/cost reported 
in finance income or 
finance costs. The net 
result should be a zero 
charge on a perfectly 
effective hedge.

Non-hedge accounted contracts

No hedge  
accounting applies.

These are not 
designated as hedging 
instruments. Typically, 
these are short-term 
contracts to convert 
debt back to fixed rates  
or foreign exchange 
contracts where a  
natural offset exists.

Taxation

Current tax is recognised at the amounts expected to be paid or 
recovered under the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Deferred income tax is provided, using the balance sheet liability 
method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of 

assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts. Deferred income  
tax is determined using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to 
apply when the related deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred 
income tax liability is settled.

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable  
that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary 
differences can be utilised.

Deferred income tax is provided in respect of the undistributed 
earnings of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures other than 
where it is intended that those undistributed earnings will not be 
remitted in the foreseeable future.

Current and deferred tax are recognised in the income statement, 
except when the tax relates to items charged or credited directly to 
equity or other comprehensive income, in which case the tax is also 
recognised in equity or other comprehensive income.

The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. 
Significant judgement is required in determining the estimates in 
relation to the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many 
transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination 
is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The Group 
recognises tax provisions when it is considered probable that there  
will be a future outflow of funds to a tax authority. The provisions  
are based on management’s best judgement of the application of  
tax legislation and best estimates of future settlement amounts  
(see note 7). Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different 
from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will 
impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in 
which such determination is made.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities require management judgement and 
estimation in determining the amounts to be recognised. In particular, 
when assessing the extent to which deferred tax assets should be 
recognised, significant judgement is used when considering the timing 
of the recognition and estimation is used to determine the level of 
future taxable income together with any future tax planning strategies 
(see note 13).

Employee benefits

1. Pensions – The retirement benefit asset and obligation recognised  
in the balance sheet represent the net of the present value of the 
defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at the 
balance sheet date. The defined benefit obligation is calculated 
annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit 
method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is 
determined by discounting estimated future cash flows using yields  
on high-quality corporate bonds which have terms to maturity 
approximating the terms of the related liability.

When the calculation results in a potential asset, the recognition  
of that asset is limited to the asset ceiling – that is the present value  
of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the  
plan or a reduction in future contributions. Management uses 
judgement to determine the level of refunds available from the  
plan in recognising an asset. 

The determination of the pension cost and defined benefit obligation 
of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes depends on the 
selection of certain assumptions, which include the discount rate, 
inflation rate, salary growth and longevity (see note 25).

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information148

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

1a. Accounting policies continued

Employee benefits continued

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and 
changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity  
in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise.  
The service cost, representing benefits accruing over the year, is 
included in the income statement as an operating cost. Net interest is 
calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit 
obligation and is presented as finance costs or finance income.

Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans  
are recognised as an operating expense in the income statement  
as incurred.

2. Other post-retirement obligations – The expected costs of post-
retirement medical and life assurance benefits are accrued over the 
period of employment, using a similar accounting methodology as for 
defined benefit pension obligations. The liabilities and costs relating  
to significant other post-retirement obligations are assessed annually 
by independent qualified actuaries.

3. Share-based payments – The fair value of options or shares granted 
under the Group’s share and option plans is recognised as an employee 
expense after taking into account the Group’s best estimate of the 
number of awards expected to vest. Fair value is measured at the  
date of grant and is spread over the vesting period of the option or 
share. The fair value of the options granted is measured using an 
option model that is most appropriate to the award. The fair value  
of shares awarded is measured using the share price at the date of 
grant unless another method is more appropriate. Any proceeds 
received are credited to share capital and share premium when the 
options are exercised.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised if the Group has a present legal or 
constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is more likely than 
not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation 
and the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions are discounted  
to present value where the effect is material.

Revenue recognition

The Group’s revenue streams are courseware, assessments and 
services. Courseware includes curriculum materials provided in  
book form and/or via access to digital content. Assessments includes 
test development, processing and scoring services provided to 
governments, educational institutions, corporations and professional 
bodies. Services includes the operation of schools, colleges and 
universities, including sistemas  G  in Brazil, as well as the provision of 
online learning services in partnership with universities and other 
academic institutions.

Revenue is recognised in order to depict the transfer of control of 
promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects 
the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for 
those goods and services. This process begins with the identification  
of our contract with a customer, which is generally through a master 
services agreement, customer purchase order, or a combination 
thereof. Within each contract, judgement is applied to determine  
the extent to which activities within the contract represent distinct 
performance obligations to be delivered and the total amount of 
transaction price to which we expect to be entitled. 

The transaction price determined is net of sales taxes, rebates and 
discounts, and after eliminating sales within the Group. Where a 
contract contains multiple performance obligations such as the 
provision of supplementary materials or online access with textbooks, 
revenue is allocated on the basis of relative standalone selling prices. 
Where a contract contains variable consideration, significant 
estimation is required to determine the amount to which the Group is 
expected to be entitled. 

Revenue is recognised on contracts with customers when or as 
performance obligations are satisfied which is the period or the point 
in time where control of goods or services transfers to the customer. 
Judgement is applied to determine first whether control passes over 
time and if not, then the point in time at which control passes. Where 
revenue is recognised over time judgement is used to determine the 
method which best depicts the transfer of control. Where an input 
method is used significant estimation is required to determine the 
progress towards delivering the performance obligation. 

Revenue from the sale of books is recognised net of a provision for 
anticipated returns. This provision is based primarily on historical 
return rates, customer buying patterns and retailer behaviours 
including stock levels (see note 24). If these estimates do not reflect 
actual returns in future periods then revenues could be understated  
or overstated for a particular period. When the provision for returns  
is remeasured at each reporting date to reflect changes in estimates,  
a corresponding adjustment is also recorded to revenue.

The Group may enter into contracts with another party in addition to 
our customer. In making the determination as to whether revenue 
should be recognised on a gross or net basis, the contract with the 
customer is analysed to understand which party controls the relevant 
good or service prior to transferring to the customer. This judgement is 
informed by facts and circumstances of the contract in determining 
whether the Group has promised to provide the specified good or 
service or whether the Group is arranging for the transfer of the 
specified good or service, including which party is responsible for 
fulfilment, has discretion to set the price to the customer and is 
responsible for inventory risk. On certain contracts, where the Group 
acts as an agent, only commissions and fees receivable for services 
rendered are recognised as revenue. Any third party costs incurred on 
behalf of the principal that are rechargeable under the contractual 
arrangement are not included in revenue.

Income from recharges of freight and other activities which are 
incidental to the normal revenue-generating activities is included in 
other income.

Additional details on the Group’s revenue streams are also included  
in note 3.

Leases

The Group as a lessee
The Group assesses whether a contract is or contains a lease at the 
inception of the contract. A contract is, or contains a lease, if the 
contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a 
period of time in exchange for consideration. The Group recognises a 
right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date 
with respect to all lease arrangements except for short-term leases 
(leases with a lease term of 12 months or less) and leases of low value 
assets. For these leases, the lease payments are recognised as an 
operating expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information149

1a. Accounting policies continued

Leases continued

The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, comprising the initial 
amount of the lease liability plus any initial direct costs incurred and  
an estimate of costs to restore the underlying asset, less any lease 
incentives received. The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated 
using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the 
earlier of the end of the useful life of the asset or the end of the lease 
term. The Group applies IAS 36 to determine whether a right-of-use 
asset is impaired. The lease liability is initially measured at the present 
value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement 
date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that 
rate cannot be readily determined, the incremental borrowing rate. 
The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective 
interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future 
lease payments arising from a change in an index or a rate or a change 
in the Group’s assessment of whether it will exercise an extension  
or termination option. When the lease liability is remeasured,  
a corresponding adjustment is made to the right-of-use asset.

Management uses judgement to determine the lease term where 
extension and termination options are available within the lease.

The Group as a lessor
When the Group is an intermediate lessor, the head lease and 
sub-lease are accounted for as two separate contracts. The head lease 
is accounted for as per the lessee policy above. The sub-lease is 
classified as a finance lease or operating lease by reference to the 
right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. Where the lease 
transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the 
lessee the contract is classified as a finance lease; all other leases are 
classified as operating leases. Rental income from operating leases is 
recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease. 
Amounts due from lessees under finance sub-leases are recognised as 
receivables at the amount of the Group’s net investment in the leases 
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate 
cannot be readily determined, the discount rate used in the head lease.

Dividends

Final dividends are recorded in the Group’s financial statements in  
the period in which they are approved by the company’s shareholders. 
Interim dividends are recorded when paid. 

Discontinued operations

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group’s business that 
represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of 
operations that has been disposed of or meets the criteria to be 
classified as held for sale.

When applicable, discontinued operations are presented in the income 
statement as a separate line and are shown net of tax.

Assets and liabilities held for sale

Assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale and stated at the 
lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell if it is highly 
probable that the carrying amount will be recovered principally 
through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use.  
No depreciation is charged in respect of non-current assets classified 
as held for sale. Amounts relating to non-current assets and liabilities 
held for sale are classified as discontinued operations in the income 
statement where appropriate.

Trade receivables

Trade receivables are stated at fair value after provision for bad and 
doubtful debts. Provisions for bad and doubtful debts are based on  
the expected credit loss model. The ‘simplified approach’ is used with 
the expected loss allowance measured at an amount equal to the 
lifetime expected credit losses. A provision for anticipated future sales 
returns is included within trade and other liabilities (also see Revenue 
recognition policy).

1b. Change of accounting policy: Amendment to IFRS 16
The Group early adopted COVID-19 Related Rent Concessions – 
Amendment to IFRS 16, issued on 28 May 2020. The amendment 
introduces an optional practical expedient for leases in which the 
Group is a lessee. For leases to which the Group applies the 
amendment, the Group is not required to assess whether eligible rent 
concessions that are a direct consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic 
are lease modifications. The Group has applied the amendment 
retrospectively to all rent concessions that meet the conditions in the 
amendment. The amendment has no impact on retained earnings at 
1 January 2020. The eligible rent concessions granted to the Group 
have no material impact on the Group’s financial statements.

1c. Going concern
In assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern for  
the period to 30 June 2022, the board analysed a variety of downside 
scenarios including a severe but plausible scenario where the Group is 
impacted by all principal risks from 2021 (weighted for probability of 
occurrence) as well as reverse stress testing to identify what would be 
required to either breach covenants or run out of liquidity. The severe 
but plausible scenario modelled a severe reduction in revenue, profit 
and operating cash flow from COVID-19 and other risks which in 
aggregate were significantly greater than seen in 2020 continuing 
throughout 2021 to 2022. 

At 31 December 2020, the Group had available liquidity of c£1.9bn, 
comprising central cash balances and its undrawn $1.19bn Revolving 
Credit Facility (RCF) maturing February 2024. Even under a severe 
downside case where further declines in profitability compared to 
2020 are modelled in 2021 and 2022, the Group would maintain 
liquidity headroom in excess of £800m and sufficient headroom 
against covenant requirements during the period under assessment 
even before modelling the mitigating effect of actions that 
management would take in the event that these downside risks  
were to crystallise.

The directors have confirmed that there are no material uncertainties 
that cast doubt on the Group’s going concern status and that they  
have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources 
to continue in operational existence for a minimum of the next  
12 months.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information150

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

2. Segment information
From 1 January 2020, the Group has reorganised and is reporting for the first time new segmental analyses to reflect the new management 
structure and operating model. The primary segments for management and reporting purposes are Global Online Learning, Global Assessment, 
North American Courseware and International. The Group separately reports the costs of Enabling Functions such as enterprise technology, 
finance, human resources and other corporate functions. In addition, the Group has separately disclosed the results from the Penguin Random 
House associate to the point of disposal in April 2020. Comparative figures for 2019 have been restated to reflect the new segments. 

The chief operating decision-maker is the Pearson Executive Management team. 

Global Online Learning – Virtual Schools and Online Program Management.

Global Assessment – Pearson VUE, US Student Assessment and Clinical Assessment.

North American Courseware – Courseware and services businesses in the US and Canada.

International – Courseware and other businesses outside North America and including UK Qualifications and English.

For more detail on the services and products included in each business segment, refer to the strategic report.

All figures in £ millions

Sales

Adjusted operating profit

Cost of major restructuring

Intangible charges

Other net gains and losses

Operating profit/(loss)

Finance costs

Finance income

Profit before tax

Income tax

Profit for the year

Other segment items

Share of results of joint ventures  
and associates

Depreciation

Amortisation 

Notes

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Enabling 
Functions

Penguin 
Random 
House

697

99

–

(29)

–

70

892

245

–

(36)

–

209

894

190

–

–

3

193

914

182

–

(15)

(5)

162

–

(404)

–

–

–

(404)

–

1

–

–

180

181

3

6

6

7

2020

Group

3,397

313

–

(80)

178

411

(107)

50

354

(44)

310

12

10

11, 20

–

12

56

–

39

111

–

28

175

4

39

77

–

7

53

1

–

–

5

125

472

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information151

2. Segment information continued

All figures in £ millions

Sales

Adjusted operating profit

Cost of major restructuring

Intangible charges

Other net gains and losses

Operating profit/(loss)

Finance costs

Finance income

Profit before tax

Income tax

Profit for the year

Other segment items

Share of results of joint ventures  
and associates

Depreciation

Amortisation

Notes

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Enabling 
Functions

Penguin 
Random 
House

586

84

–

(35)

–

49

1,031

1,091

351

(7)

(27)

–

317

231

(51)

–

13

193

1,161

299

(24)

(89)

3

189

–

(449)

(75)

–

–

(524)

–

65

(2)

(12)

–

51

3

6

6

7

12

10

11, 20

–

11

55

–

38

94

–

32

187

3

42

144

–

–

57

51

–

–

2019

Group

3,869

581

(159)

(163)

16

275

(84)

41

232

34

266

54

123

537

Intangible charges – These represent charges relating to acquired 
intangibles, acquisition costs and movements in contingent acquisition 
and disposal consideration. These charges are excluded as they reflect 
past acquisition activity and do not necessarily reflect the current year 
performance of the Group. Intangible amortisation charges in 2020 
were £80m including impairment charges of £12m. In 2019, intangible 
charges were £163m including impairment charges of £65m.

Other net gains and losses – These represent profits and losses on  
the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and other financial 
assets and are excluded from adjusted operating profit as they  
distort the performance of the Group as reported on a statutory  
basis. Other net gains in 2020 largely relate to the sale of the remaining 
interest in Penguin Random House (£180m gain) and impairments of 
assets and other costs relating to the disposal of Pearson Institute of 
Higher Education (£8m loss). In 2019, other net gains largely relate to 
the sale of the US K-12 business. 

There were no material inter-segment sales in either 2020 or 2019. 

Corporate costs are allocated to business segments on an appropriate 
basis depending on the nature of the cost and therefore the total 
segment result is equal to the Group operating profit.

For additional detailed information on the calculation of adjusted 
operating profit as shown in the above tables, see pp212–216  
(Financial key performance indicators). 

Adjusted operating profit is shown in the above tables as it is  
the key financial measure used by management to evaluate the 
performance of the Group and allocate resources to business 
segments. The measure also enables investors to more easily,  
and consistently, track the underlying operational performance  
of the Group and its business segments over time by separating  
out those items of income and expenditure relating to acquisition  
and disposal transactions, major restructuring programmes and 
certain other items that are also not representative of underlying 
performance, which are explained below and reconciled in note 8. 

Cost of major restructuring – In May 2017, the Group announced a 
restructuring programme, to run between 2017 and 2019, to drive 
significant cost savings. This programme began in the second half of 
2017 and costs incurred relate to delivery of cost efficiencies in the  
US Higher Education Courseware business and enabling functions 
together with further rationalisation of the property and supplier 
portfolio. The restructuring costs in 2019 of £159m relate 
predominantly to staff redundancies. The costs of this restructuring 
programme are significant enough to exclude from the adjusted 
operating profit measure so as to better highlight the underlying 
performance (see note 4). 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information152

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

2. Segment information continued
The Group operates in the following main geographic areas:

All figures in £ millions

UK

Other European countries

US

Canada

Asia Pacific

Other countries

Total

2020

319

216

2,335

91

251

185

Sales

2019

385

244

2,417

105

441

277

Non-current assets

2020

669

129

2019

694

125

2,362

2,604

147

149

30

163

149

103

3,397

3,869

3,486

3,838

Sales are allocated based on the country in which the customer is located. This does not differ materially from the location where the order is 
received. The geographical split of non-current assets is based on the subsidiary’s country of domicile. This is not materially different to the 
location of the assets. Non-current assets comprise property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investments in joint ventures and 
associates and trade and other receivables. 

3. Revenue from contracts with customers
The following tables analyse the Group’s revenue streams. Courseware includes curriculum materials provided in book form and/or via access  
to digital content. Assessments includes integrated test development, processing and scoring services provided to governments, educational 
institutions, corporations and professional bodies. Services includes the operation of schools, colleges and universities, including sistemas in 
Brazil, as well as the provision of online learning services in partnership with universities and other academic institutions. Comparative figures  
for 2019 have been restated to reflect the new segments. 

All figures in £ millions

Sales:

Courseware

School Courseware

Higher Education Courseware

English Courseware1

Assessments

School and Higher Education Assessments

Clinical Assessments

Professional and English Certification

Services

School Services

Higher Education Services

English Services

Total

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Group

2020

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

413

284

–

697

697

–

–

–

–

255

146

491

892

–

–

–

–

29

853

–

882

–

–

–

–

–

12

–

12

247

105

132

484

218

48

61

327

29

50

24

103

276

958

132

1,366

473

194

552

1,219

442

346

24

812

892

894

914

3,397

1  English Courseware within North American Courseware was transferred to the International segment in 2020. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information153

3. Revenue from contracts with customers continued

All figures in £ millions

Sales:

Courseware

School Courseware

Higher Education Courseware

English Courseware

Assessments

School and Higher Education Assessments

Clinical Assessments

Professional and English Certification

Services

School Services

Higher Education Services

English Services

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Group

2019

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

319

267

–

586

–

–

–

–

309

175

547

1,031

–

–

–

–

86

975

14

1,075

–

–

–

–

–

16

–

16

287

125

163

575

290

52

91

433

48

54

51

153

373

1,100

177

1,650

599

227

638

1,464

367

337

51

755

Total

586

1,031

1,091

1,161

3,869

The Group derived revenue from the transfer of goods and services over time and at a point in time in the following major product lines:

All figures in £ millions

Courseware1

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Assessments

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Services

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Total

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Total

2020

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

697

697

697

–

–

–

96

796

892

–

–

–

892

261

621

882

–

–

–

–

12

12

894

409

75

484

52

275

327

44

59

103

914

670

696

1,366

148

1,071

1,219

44

768

812

3,397

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information154

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

3. Revenue from contracts with customers continued

All figures in £ millions

Courseware1

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Assessments

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Services2

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Total

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Total

2019

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

586

586

586

–

–

–

113

918

1,031

–

–

–

448

627

1,075

–

–

–

–

16

16

1,031

1,091

506

69

575

61

372

433

86

67

153

1,161

954

696

1,650

174

1,290

1,464

86

669

755

3,869

1  Previous classifications within Courseware of ‘Point in Time (Sale or Return)’ and ‘Point in time (other)’ have been combined in both 2020 and 2019 as these two categories 

contained similar types of customers, risks and obligations.

2  2019 International revenue split between ‘Services Over Time’ to ‘Services Point in Time’ restated by £60m primarily due to a change in classification of certain revenues 

within the Brazilian Sistemas Franchise business.

a. Nature of goods and services

The following is a description of the nature of the Group’s performance 
obligations within contracts with customers broken down by revenue 
stream, along with significant judgements and estimates made within 
each of those revenue streams.

Courseware

K E Key areas of estimation

  The level of provisions required for anticipated returns is 
estimated based on historical experiences, customer buying 
patterns and retailer behaviours including stock levels. 

Revenue is generated from customers through the sales of print and 
digital courseware materials to schools, bookstores and direct to 
individual learners. Goods and services may be sold separately  
or purchased together in bundled packages. The goods and  
services included in bundled arrangements are considered distinct 
performance obligations, except for where Pearson provides both a 
licence of intellectual property and an ongoing hosting service.  
As the licence of intellectual property is only available with the 
concurrent hosting service, the licence is not treated as a distinct 
performance obligation separate from the hosting service.

The transaction price is allocated between distinct performance 
obligations on the basis of their relative standalone selling prices. 

In determining the transaction price, variable consideration exists  
in the form of discounts and anticipated returns. Discounts reduce  
the transaction price on a given transaction. A provision for anticipated 
returns is made based primarily on historical return rates, customer 
buying patterns and retailer behaviours including stock levels (see note 
24). If these estimates do not reflect actual returns in future periods 
then revenues could be understated or overstated for a particular 
period. Variable consideration as described above is determined  
using the expected value approach. The sales return liability at the  
end of 2020 was £86m (2019: £122m) (see note 24). This represents  
2% of annual sales subject to sale or return.

While payment for these goods and services generally occurs at the 
start of these arrangements, the length of time between payment  
and delivery of the performance obligations is generally short-term in 
nature or the reason for early payment relates to reasons other than 
financing, including customers securing a vendor in a longer-term 
arrangement or the transfer of goods or services is at the discretion of 
the customer. For these reasons and the use of the practical expedient 
on short-term financing, significant financing components are not 
recognised within Courseware transactions.

Revenue from the sale of physical books is recognised at a point in  
time when control passes. This is generally at the point of shipment 
when title passes to the customer, when the Group has a present right 
to payment and the significant risks and rewards of ownership have 
passed to the customer. Revenue from physical books sold through  
the direct print rental method is recognised over the rental period,  
as the customer is simultaneously receiving and consuming the 
benefits of this rental service through the passage of time.

Revenue from the sale of digital courseware products is recognised  
on a straight-line basis over the subscription period, unless hosted  
by a third party or representative of a downloadable product, in which 
case Pearson has no ongoing obligation and recognises revenue  
when control transfers as the customer is granted access to the  
digital product. 

Revenue from the sale of ‘off-the-shelf’ software is recognised on 
delivery or on installation of the software where that is a condition  
of the contract. In certain circumstances, where installation is  
complex, revenue is recognised when the customer has completed 
their acceptance procedures. 

Assessments
Revenue is primarily generated from multi-year contractual 
arrangements related to large-scale assessment delivery, such as 
contracts to process qualifying tests for individual professions and 
government departments, and is recognised as performance occurs. 
Under these arrangements, while the agreement spans multiple years, 
the contract duration has been determined to be each testing cycle 
based on contract structure, including clauses regarding termination. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information155

3. Revenue from contracts with customers continued

a. Nature of goods and services continued

While in some cases the customer may have the ability to terminate 
during the term for convenience, significant financial or qualitative 
barriers exist limiting the potential for such terminations in the middle 
of a testing cycle.

Within each testing cycle, a variety of service activities are performed 
such as test administration, delivery, scoring, reporting, item 
development, operational services and programme management. 
These services are not treated as distinct in the context of the customer 
contract as Pearson provides an integrated managed service offering 
and these activities are accounted for together as one comprehensive 
performance obligation. 

Within each testing cycle, the transaction price may contain both fixed 
and variable amounts. Variable consideration within these transactions 
primarily relates to expected testing volumes to be delivered in the 
cycle. The assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent to long-term 
contract accounting can affect the amounts and timing of revenue and 
related expenses reported. Variable consideration is measured using 
the expected value method, except where amounts are contingent 
upon a future event’s occurrence, such as performance bonuses.  
Such event-driven contingency payments are measured using the  
most likely amount approach. In estimating and constraining variable 
consideration; historical experiences, current trends and local market 
conditions are considered. To the extent that a higher degree of 
uncertainty exists regarding variable consideration, these amounts  
are excluded from the transaction price and recognised when the 
uncertainty is reasonably removed.

Customer payments are generally defined in the contract through a 
payment schedule, which may require customer acceptance for 
services rendered. Pearson has a history of providing satisfactory 
services which are accepted by the customer. While a delay between 
rendering of services and payment may exist, payment terms are 
within 12 months and the Group has elected to use the practical 
expedient available in IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with  
Customers’ and not identify a significant financing component  
on these transactions.

Revenue is recognised for Assessment contracts over time as the 
customer is benefiting as performance takes place through a 
continuous transfer of control to the customer. This continuous 
transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the 
contracts which may allow the customer to terminate for convenience, 
compensate us for work performed to date, and take possession of 
work in process. 

As control transfers over time, revenue is recognised based on the 
extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. 
The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion 
requires judgement and is based on the nature of the services 
provided. Revenue is recognised on a percentage completion basis, 
calculated using the proportion of the total estimated costs incurred  
to date. Percentage of completion is used to recognise the transfer of 
control of services provided as these services are not provided evenly 
throughout the testing cycle and involve varying degrees of effort 
during the term. 

Losses on contracts are recognised in the period in which the loss  
first becomes foreseeable. Contract losses are determined to be the 
amount by which estimated total costs of the contract exceed the 
estimated total revenues that will be generated.

In Assessments contracts driven primarily by transactions directly to 
end users, Pearson’s main obligation to the customer involves test 
delivery and scoring. Test delivery and scoring are defined as a single 
performance obligation delivered over time whether the test is 
subsequently manually scored or digitally scored on the day of the 
assessment. Customers may also purchase print and digital 
supplemental materials. Print products in this revenue stream are 
recognised at a point in time when control passes to the customer 
upon shipment. Recognition of digital revenue will occur based on  
the extent of Pearson’s ongoing hosting obligation. 

Services
Revenue is primarily generated from multi-year contractual 
arrangements related to large-scale educational service delivery  
to academic institutions, such as schools and higher education 
universities. Under these arrangements, while an agreement may  
span multiple years, the contract duration has been determined to be 
each academic period based on the structure of contracts, including 
clauses regarding termination. While in some cases the customer  
may have the ability to terminate during the term for convenience, 
significant financial or qualitative barriers exist limiting the potential for 
such terminations in the middle of an academic period. The academic 
period for this customer base is normally an academic year for schools 
and a semester for higher education universities.

Within each academic period, a variety of services are provided such as 
programme development, student acquisition, education technology 
and student support services. These services are not distinct in the 
context of the customer contract as Pearson provides an integrated 
managed service offering and these activities are accounted for 
together as a comprehensive performance obligation. 

Where Services are provided to university customers, volume and 
transaction price are fixed at the start of the semester. Where Services 
are provided to school customers, the transaction price may contain 
both fixed and variable amounts which require estimation during the 
academic period. Estimation is required where consideration is based 
upon average enrolments or other metrics which are not known at 
the start of the academic year. Variable consideration is measured 
using the expected value method. Historical experience, current 
trends, local circumstances and customer-specific funding formulas 
are considered in estimating and constraining variable consideration. 
To the extent that a higher degree of uncertainty exists regarding 
variable consideration, these amounts are excluded from the 
transaction price and recognised when the uncertainty is  
reasonably removed.

Customer payments are generally defined in the contract as occurring 
shortly after invoicing. Where there is a longer payment term offered  
to a customer through a payment schedule, payment terms are within 
12 months and the Group has elected to use the practical expedient 
available in IFRS 15 and not identify a significant financing component 
on these transactions.

Revenue is recognised for Service contracts over time as the customer 
is benefiting as performance takes place through a continuous transfer 
of control to the customer. This continuous transfer of control to the 
customer is supported by clauses in the contracts which may allow  
the customer to terminate for convenience, compensate for work 
performed to date, and take possession of work in process. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information156

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

3. Revenue from contracts with customers continued

a. Nature of goods and services continued

As control transfers over time, revenue is recognised based on the 
extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. 
The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion 
requires judgement and is based on the nature of the products or 
services provided. Within the comprehensive service obligation,  
the timing of services occurs relatively evenly over each academic 
period and, as such, time elapsed is used to recognise the transfer  
of control to the customer on a straight-line basis.

Losses on contracts are recognised in the period in which the loss  
first becomes foreseeable. Contract losses are determined to be the 
amount by which estimated total costs of the contract exceed the 
estimated total revenues that will be generated.

In cases of optional or add-on purchases, institutions may purchase 
physical goods priced at their standalone value, which are accounted 
for separately and recognised at the point in time when control passes 
to the customer upon shipment.

b. Disaggregation of revenue

The tables in notes 2 and 3 show revenue from contracts with 
customers disaggregated by operating segment, geography and 
revenue stream. These disaggregation categories are appropriate as 
they represent the key groupings used in managing and evaluating 
underlying performance of each of the businesses. The categories  
also reflect groups of similar types of transactional characteristics, 
among similar customers, with similar accounting conclusions. 

c. Contract balances

Transactions within the Courseware revenue stream generally entail 
customer billings at or near the contract’s inception and accordingly 
Courseware deferred income balances are primarily related to 
subscription performance obligations to be delivered over time.

Transactions within the Assessments and Services revenue streams 
generally entail customer billings over time based on periodic intervals, 
progress towards milestones or enrolment census dates. As the 
performance obligations within these arrangements are delivered  
over time, the extent of accrued income or deferred income will 
ultimately depend upon the difference between revenue recognised 
and billings to date.

Refer to note 22 for opening and closing balances of accrued income. 
Refer to note 24 for opening and closing balances of deferred income. 
Revenue recognised during the period from changes in deferred 
income was driven primarily by the release of revenue over time  
from digital subscriptions. 

d. Contract costs

The Group capitalises incremental costs to obtain contracts with 
customers where it is expected these costs will be recoverable. 
Incremental costs to obtain contracts with customers are considered 
those which would not have been incurred if the contract had not  
been obtained. For the Group, these costs relate primarily to sales 
commissions. The Group has elected to use the practical expedient  
as allowable by IFRS 15 whereby such costs will be expensed as 
incurred where the expected amortisation period is one year or less. 
Where the amortisation period is greater than one year, these costs  
are amortised over the contract term on a systematic basis consistent 
with the transfer of the underlying goods and services within the 
contract to which these costs relate, which will generally be on a  
ratable basis. 

The Group does not recognise any material costs to fulfil contracts  
with customers as these types of activities are governed by other 
accounting standards.

There were no deferred contract costs in 2020 or 2019.

e. Remaining transaction price

The below table depicts the remaining transaction price on unsatisfied 
or partially unsatisfied performance obligations from contracts  
with customers.

Sales

Deferred 
income

Committed 
sales

Total 
remaining 
transaction 
price

2021

2022

All figures in £ millions

Courseware

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Assessments

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Services

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time – subscriptions

Products and services transferred over time – other 
ongoing performance obligations

Total

670

696

148

1,071

44

323

445

3,397

–

105

1

217

–

18

18

359

–

14

–

413

–

10

195

632

–

119

1

630

–

28

213

991

–

84

1

426

–

27

213

751

2020

2023  
and later

–

21

–

1

–

–

–

–

14

–

203

–

1

–

218

22

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information157

3. Revenue from contracts with customers continued

e. Remaining transaction price continued

Sales

Deferred 
income

Committed 
sales

Total 
remaining 
transaction 
price

2020

2021

All figures in £ millions

Courseware

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Assessments

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time

Services1

Products transferred at a point in time

Products and services transferred over time – subscriptions

Products and services transferred over time – other 
ongoing performance obligations

Total

954

696

174

1,290

86

310

359

3,869

2

118

–

206

2

11

21

360

–

–

–

375

–

–

106

481

2

118

–

581

2

11

127

841

2

82

–

433

2

11

126

656

2019

2022  
and later

–

23

–

2

–

–

–

–

13

–

146

–

–

1

160

25

1  2019 International revenue split between ‘Services Over Time’ to ‘Services Point in Time’ restated by £60m primarily due to a change in classification of certain revenues 

within the Brazilian Sistemas Franchise business.

Committed sales amounts are equal to the transaction price from contracts with customers, excluding those amounts previously recognised  
as revenue and amounts currently recognised in deferred income. The total of committed sales and deferred income is equal to the remaining 
transaction price. Time bands stated above represent the expected timing of when the remaining transaction price will be recognised as revenue.

4. Operating expenses

All figures in £ millions

By function:

Cost of goods sold

Operating expenses

Distribution costs

Selling, marketing and product development costs

Administrative and other expenses

Restructuring costs

Other income

Total net operating expenses

Other net gains and losses

Total

2020

2019

1,767

1,858

59

572

816

–

(45)

1,402

(178)

2,991

73

631

999

157

(54)

1,806

(16)

3,648

Other income includes freight income and sublet income. In 2019, other income included service fee income from the Group’s then associate 
Penguin Random House of £4m. Included in administrative and other expenses are research and efficacy costs of £11m (2019: £13m). In 2019,  
in addition to the restructuring costs shown above, there were restructuring costs in relation to associates of £2m. Other net gains and losses  
in 2020 largely relate to the sale of the remaining interest in Pearson Random House (£180m gain) and impairments of assets and other costs 
relating to the disposal of Pearson Institute of Higher Education (£8m loss). In 2019, other net gains and losses largely relate to the sale of the  
US K12 business.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information158

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

4. Operating expenses continued
An analysis of major restructuring costs is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

By nature:

Product costs

Employee costs

Depreciation and amortisation

Property and facilities

Technology and communications

Professional and outsourced services

General and administrative costs

Total restructuring – operating expenses

Share of associate restructuring

Total

2020

2019

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

16

90

14

12

2

17

6

157

2

159

In May 2017, the Group announced a major restructuring programme to run between 2017 and 2019 to drive further significant cost savings.  
The costs of this programme have been excluded from adjusted operating profit so as to better highlight the underlying performance (see note 8). 

All figures in £ millions

By nature:

Royalties expensed

Other product costs

Employee benefit expense

Contract labour

Employee-related expense

Promotional costs

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

Amortisation of intangible assets – pre-publication

Amortisation of intangible assets – software

Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets – other

Property and facilities

Technology and communications

Professional and outsourced services

Other general and administrative costs

Costs capitalised 

Other net gains and losses

Other income

Total

During the year the Group obtained the following services from the Group’s auditors:

All figures in £ millions

The audit of parent company and consolidated financial statements

The audit of the company’s subsidiaries

Total audit fees

Audit-related and other assurance services

Other non-audit services

Total other services

Total non-audit services

Total

Notes

2020

2019

191

349

242

466

5

1,337

1,452

10

20

11

11

67

30

233

125

280

112

80

85

216

498

71

(460)

(178)

(45)

139

94

254

123

271

115

151

96

196

480

104

(465)

(16)

(54)

2,991

3,648

2020

2019

5

2

7

–

–

–

–

7

5

2

7

–

–

–

–

7

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information159

4. Operating expenses continued
Reconciliation between audit and non-audit service fees is shown below:

All figures in £ millions

Group audit fees including fees for attestation under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Non-audit fees

Total

2020

2019

7

–

7

7

–

7

Fees for attestation under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are allocated between fees payable for the audits of consolidated and  
subsidiary accounts. Included in Group audit fees for 2020 are additional fees in relation to prior year audit work.

5. Employee information

All figures in £ millions

Employee benefit expense

Wages and salaries (including termination costs)

Social security costs

Share-based payment costs

Retirement benefits – defined contribution plans

Retirement benefits – defined benefit plans

Other post-retirement medical benefits

Total

The details of the emoluments of the Directors of Pearson plc are shown in the report on Directors’ remuneration.

Average number employed

Employee numbers

UK

Other European countries

US

Canada

Asia Pacific

Other countries

Total

6. Net finance costs

All figures in £ millions

Interest payable on financial liabilities at amortised cost and associated derivatives

Interest on lease liabilities

Net foreign exchange losses

Derivatives not in a hedge relationship

Finance costs

Interest receivable on financial assets at amortised cost

Interest on lease receivables

Net finance income in respect of retirement benefits

Fair value remeasurement of disposal proceeds

Derivatives not in a hedge relationship

Finance income

Net finance costs

Analysed as:

Net interest payable reflected in adjusted earnings

Other net finance income/(costs)

Net finance costs

Notes

2020

2019

1,152

96

29

47

13

–

1,258

100

25

57

13

(1)

1,337

1,452

26

25

25

25

2020

2019

4,204

865

4,345

852

10,916

12,226

323

3,133

1,894

398

2,748

2,165

21,335

22,734

Notes

2020

2019

25

(38)

(41)

(6)

(22)

(107)

9

9

6

26

–

50

(57)

(61)

4

(57)

(22)

(45)

(5)

(12)

(84)

15

11

13

–

2

41

(43)

(41)

(2)

(43)

Included in interest receivable is £nil (2019: £1m) of interest receivable from related parties. Net movement in fair value of hedges is explained in 
note 16. For further information on adjusted measures above, see note 8.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information160

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

7. Income tax

All figures in £ millions

Current tax

Charge in respect of current year

Adjustments in respect of prior years

Total current tax charge

Deferred tax

In respect of temporary differences

Other adjustments in respect of prior years

Total deferred tax (charge)/credit

Total tax (charge)/credit

Notes

2020

2019

(18)

4

(14)

(28)

(2)

(30)

(44)

(51)

21

(30)

59

5

64

34

13

The adjustments in respect of prior years in both 2020 and 2019 primarily arise from revising the previous year’s reported tax provision to reflect 
the tax returns subsequently filed. This results in a change between deferred and current tax as well as an absolute benefit to the total tax charge.

The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the UK tax rate as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Profit before tax

Tax calculated at UK rate (2020: 19%, 2019: 19%)

Effect of overseas tax rates

Effect of UK rate change

Joint venture and associate income reported net of tax

Intra-group financing benefit

Movement in provisions for tax uncertainties

Net expense not subject to tax

Gains and losses on sale of businesses not subject to tax

Unrecognised tax losses

Adjustments in respect of prior years

Total tax (charge)/credit

UK

Overseas

Total tax (charge)/credit

Tax rate reflected in earnings

Included in net expense not subject to tax are foreign taxes not 
creditable, the tax impact of share-based payments and other 
expenses not deductible.

K J Key judgements

  The application of tax legislation in relation to provisions for 
uncertain tax positions.

K E Key areas of estimation

  The level of provisions required in relation to uncertain tax 
positions is complex and each matter is separately assessed.  
The estimation of future settlement amounts is based on a 
number of factors including the status of the unresolved matter, 
clarity of legislation, range of possible outcomes and the statute  
of limitations. 

Factors which may affect future tax charges include changes in tax 
legislation, transfer pricing regulations, the level and mix of profitability 
in different countries, and settlements with tax authorities.

2020

354

(67)

(6)

(5)

1

14

24

(7)

21

(21)

2

(44)

23

(67)

(44)

2019

232

(44)

(2)

–

10

11

3

(10)

57

(17)

26

34

(12)

46

34

12.5%

(14.7)%

The movement in provisions for tax uncertainties primarily reflects 
releases due to the expiry of relevant statutes of limitation, settlement 
of certain audits and the establishment of provisions for new uncertain 
tax positions. The current tax liability of £84m (2019: £55m) includes 
£104m (2019: £152m) of provisions for tax uncertainties principally in 
respect of several matters in the US, the UK and China. The matters 
provided for include the allocation between territories of proceeds  
of historical business disposals and the potential disallowance of 
intra-group recharges. The Group is currently under audit in several 
countries, and the timing of any resolution of these audits is uncertain. 
Of the balance of £104m, £57m relates to 2015 and earlier and is mostly 
under audit. In most countries, tax years up to and including 2014 are 
now statute barred from examination by tax authorities. Of the 
remaining balance, £17m relates to 2016, £14m to 2017, £3m to 2018, 
£10m to 2019 and £3m to 2020.

If relevant enquiry windows pass with no audit, management believes 
it is reasonably possible that provision levels will reduce by an 
estimated £10m within the next 12 months. However, the tax 
authorities may take a different view from management and the  
final liability may be greater than provided.

Contingent liabilities relating to tax are disclosed in note 34.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information161

7. Income tax continued
The tax rate reflected in adjusted earnings is calculated as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Profit before tax

Adjustments:

Cost of major restructuring

Other net gains and losses

Intangible charges

Other net finance (income)/costs

Adjusted profit before tax

Total tax (charge)/credit

Adjustments:

Tax benefit on cost of major restructuring

Tax charge/(benefit) on other net gains and losses

Tax benefit on intangible charges

Tax charge on other net finance costs

Tax amortisation benefit on goodwill and intangibles

Adjusted tax charge

Tax rate reflected in adjusted earnings

For further information on adjusted measures above, see note 8.

The tax (charge)/benefit recognised in other comprehensive income is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

Fair value gain on other financial assets

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations 

2020

354

–

(178)

80

(4)

252

(44)

–

3

(22)

4

24

(35)

2019

232

159

(16)

163

2

540

34

(35)

(68)

(48)

–

28

(89)

13.7%

16.5%

2020

2019

(13)

(6)

2

(17)

5

(4)

22

23

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information162

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

8. Earnings per share

Basic

Diluted

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit or loss 
attributable to equity shareholders of the company (earnings) by the 
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, 
excluding ordinary shares purchased by the company and held as 
treasury shares.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted 
average number of ordinary shares to take account of all dilutive 
potential ordinary shares and adjusting the profit attributable,  
if applicable, to account for any tax consequences that might arise  
from conversion of those shares. A dilution is not calculated for a loss.

All figures in £ millions

Earnings for the year

Non-controlling interest

Earnings attributable to equity shareholders

Weighted average number of shares (millions)

Effect of dilutive share options (millions)

Weighted average number of shares (millions) for diluted earnings

Earnings per share (in pence per share)

Basic

Diluted

Adjusted

For additional detailed information on the calculation of adjusted 
measures, see pp212-216 (Financial key performance indicators).  
See note 2 for details of specific items excluded from or included  
in adjusted operating profit in 2020 and 2019.

In order to show results from operating activities on a consistent basis, 
an adjusted earnings per share is presented. The Group’s definition  
of adjusted earnings per share may not be comparable with other 
similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Adjusted earnings is a non-GAAP (non-statutory) financial measure 
and is included as it is a key financial measure used by management  
to evaluate the performance of the Group and allocate resources to 
business segments. The measure also enables investors to more easily, 
and consistently, track the underlying operational performance of the 
Group and its business segments over time by separating out those 
items of income and expenditure relating to acquisition and disposal 
transactions, major restructuring programmes and certain other  
items that are also not representative of underlying performance.

Adjusted earnings per share is calculated as adjusted earnings  
divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue on an 
undiluted basis. The following items are excluded from or included  
in adjusted earnings:

Cost of major restructuring – In May 2017, the Group announced a 
restructuring programme, to run between 2017 and 2019, to drive 
significant cost savings. This programme began in the second half of 
2017 and costs incurred to date relate to delivery of cost efficiencies  
in our enabling functions and US Higher Education Courseware 
business together with further rationalisation of the property and 
supplier portfolio. The restructuring costs in 2019 of £159m relate 
predominantly to staff redundancies. The costs of this restructuring 
programme are significant enough to exclude from the adjusted 
operating profit measure so as to better highlight the underlying 
performance (see note 4). 

2020

310

–

310

755.4

–

755.4

41.0p

41.0p

2019

266

(2)

264

777.0

0.5

777.5

34.0p

34.0p

Other net gains and losses – These represent profits and losses  
on the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and other  
financial assets and are excluded from adjusted earnings as they 
distort the performance of the Group as reported on a statutory  
basis. Other net gains in 2020 largely relate to the sale of the remaining 
interest in Penguin Random House (£180m gain) and impairments of 
assets and other costs relating to the disposal of Pearson Institute of 
Higher Education (£8m loss). In 2019, other net gains largely relate to 
the sale of the US K-12 business. There is no tax associated with the 
Penguin Random House disposal. The tax charge of £3m in 2020 
relates to other gains and losses.

Intangible charges – These represent charges in respect of intangible 
assets acquired through business combinations and the direct costs  
of acquiring those businesses. These charges are excluded as they 
reflect past acquisition activity and do not necessarily reflect the 
current year performance of the Group. Intangible amortisation 
charges in 2020 were £80m including impairment charges of £12m.  
In 2019, intangible charges were £163m including impairment charges 
of £65m.

Other net finance income/costs – These include finance costs in respect 
of retirement benefits, finance costs relating to acquisition and 
disposal transactions and foreign exchange and other net gains and 
losses. Net finance income relating to retirement benefits is excluded 
as management does not believe that the consolidated income 
statement presentation under IAS 19 reflects the economic substance 
of the underlying assets and liabilities. Finance costs associated with 
acquisition and disposal transactions are excluded as these relate to 
future earn-outs or acquisition expenses and are not part of the 
underlying financing. In 2020, the fair value re-measurement of 
disposal proceeds relates to the US K-12 disposal in 2019. Foreign 
exchange and other net gains and losses are excluded as they 
represent short-term fluctuations in market value and are subject to 
significant volatility. Other net gains and losses may not be realised  
in due course as it is normally the intention to hold the related 
instruments to maturity. In 2020 and 2019, the foreign exchange gains 
and losses largely relate to foreign exchange differences on unhedged 
intercompany loans and cash and cash equivalents. Losses on 
derivatives not in a hedge relationship represent the unrealised mark 
to market of long-term interest rate hedges used to fix the interest  
rate of borrowings.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information163

8. Earnings per share continued

Adjusted continued

Tax – Tax on the above items is excluded from adjusted earnings. Where relevant, the Group also excludes the benefit from recognising previously 
unrecognised pre-acquisition and capital losses. The tax benefit from tax deductible goodwill and intangibles is added to the adjusted income tax 
charge as this benefit more accurately aligns the adjusted tax charge with the expected rate of cash tax payments. 

Non-controlling interest – Non-controlling interest for the above items is excluded from adjusted earnings. 

The following tables reconcile the statutory income statement to the adjusted income statement.

All figures in £ millions

Operating profit

Net finance costs

Profit before tax

Income tax

Profit for the year

Non-controlling interest

Earnings

Weighted average number of shares (millions)

Weighted average number of shares (millions) for diluted 
earnings

Earnings per share (basic)

Earnings per share (diluted)

All figures in £ millions

Operating profit

Net finance costs

Profit before tax

Income tax

Profit for the year

Non-controlling interest

Earnings

Weighted average number of shares (millions)

Weighted average number of shares (millions) for diluted 
earnings

Earnings per share (basic)

Earnings per share (diluted)

Statutory 
income 
statement

Cost of  
major 
restructuring

Other net 
gains and 
losses

Intangible 
charges

2020

Other net 
finance 
income/ 
costs

Tax 
amortisation 
benefit

Adjusted 
income 
statement

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(178)

–

(178)

3

(175)

–

(175)

80

–

80

(22)

58

–

58

–

(4)

(4)

4

–

–

–

–

–

–

24

24

–

24

411

(57)

354

(44)

310

–

310

755.4

755.4

41.0p

41.0p

313

(61)

252

(35)

217

–

217

755.4

755.4

28.7p

28.7p

2019

Statutory 
income 
statement

Cost of  
major 
restructuring

Other net 
gains and 
losses

Intangible 
charges

Other net 
finance 
income/ 
costs

Tax 
amortisation 
benefit

Adjusted 
income 
statement

275

(43)

232

34

266

(2)

264

777.0

777.5

34.0p

34.0p

159

–

159

(35)

124

–

124

(16)

–

(16)

(68)

(84)

–

(84)

163

–

163

(48)

115

–

115

–

2

2

–

2

–

2

–

–

–

28

28

–

28

581

(41)

540

(89)

451

(2)

449

777.0

777.5

57.8p

57.7p

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information164

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

9. Dividends

All figures in £ millions

Final paid in respect of prior year 13.5p (2019: 13.5p)

Interim paid in respect of current year 6p (2019: 6p)

2020

101

45

146

2019

101

46

147

The Directors are proposing a final dividend in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2020 of 13.5p per equity share which will absorb 
an estimated £102m of shareholders’ funds. It will be paid on 7 May 2021 to shareholders who are on the register of members on 26 March 2021. 
These financial statements do not reflect this dividend.

10. Property, plant and equipment

All figures in £ millions

Cost

At 1 January 2019

Exchange differences

Additions

Disposals

Reclassifications

Transfer of finance leases

Transfer to intangible assets

Transfer to intangible assets – pre-publication

At 31 December 2019

Exchange differences

Additions

Disposals

Reclassifications

Transfer to intangible assets

Transfer to assets classified as held for sale

At 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Depreciation

At 1 January 2019

Exchange differences

Charge for the year

Disposals

Transfer of finance leases

Transfer to intangible assets

Transfer to intangible assets – pre-publication

At 31 December 2019

Exchange differences

Charge for the year

Disposals

Reclassifications

Impairment in advance of transfer to assets classified as held for sale

Transfer to assets classified as held for sale

At 31 December 2020

Carrying amounts

At 1 January 2019

At 31 December 2019

At 31 December 2020

Right-of-use assets

Land and 
buildings

Plant and 
equipment

Land and 
buildings

Plant and 
equipment

Owned assets

Assets in  
course of 
construction

418

(9)

64

(13)

–

–

–

–

460

(11)

62

(13)

–

–

(59)

439

6

–

2

(4)

–

19

–

–

23

(2)

–

(9)

–

–

–

12

317

(8)

–

(13)

4

–

–

–

300

(7)

7

(23)

20

–

(1)

296

458

(15)

18

(108)

(4)

(19)

(3)

(2)

325

(11)

5

(29)

21

–

(3)

308

18

–

40

(8)

–

–

(4)

(10)

36

(1)

37

(1)

(41)

(9)

–

21

Right-of-use assets

Land and 
buildings

Plant and 
equipment

Land and 
buildings

Plant and 
equipment

Owned assets

Assets in  
course of 
construction

–

2

(60)

–

–

–

–

(58)

2

(65)

1

–

(4)

14

(110)

418

402

329

–

–

(4)

–

(12)

–

–

(16)

1

(3)

9

–

–

–

(9)

6

7

3

(195)

6

(21)

10

–

–

–

(200)

6

(25)

22

(2)

–

–

(361)

13

(38)

116

12

3

3

(252)

9

(32)

29

2

–

1

(199)

(243)

122

100

97

97

73

65

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

18

36

21

Total

1,217

(32)

124

(146)

–

–

(7)

(12)

1,144

(32)

111

(75)

–

(9)

(63)

1,076

Total

(556)

21

(123)

126

–

3

3

(526)

18

(125)

61

–

(4)

15

(561)

661

618

515

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information165

10. Property, plant and equipment continued
Depreciation expense of £44m (2019: £42m) has been included in the income statement in cost of goods sold and £81m (2019: £81m) in  
operating expenses.

11. Intangible assets

All figures in £ millions

Cost

At 1 January 2019

Exchange differences

Additions – internal development

Additions – purchased

Disposals

Acquisition through business combination

Transfer from property, plant and equipment

Transfer to intangible assets – pre-publication

Movement in held for sale

At 31 December 2019

Exchange differences

Additions – internal development

Additions – purchased

Disposals

Transfer from property, plant and equipment

Transfer from intangible assets – pre-publication

Acquired 
customer 
lists, 
contracts and 
relationships

Acquired 
trademarks 
and brands

Acquired 
publishing 
rights

Other 
intangibles 
acquired

Goodwill

Software

2,111

(57)

–

–

–

18

–

–

67

2,139

(45)

–

–

–

–

–

959

(22)

137

1

(15)

–

7

(28)

–

1,039

(24)

80

1

(6)

9

5

910

(29)

–

–

(88)

–

–

–

–

793

(25)

–

–

(17)

–

–

751

267

(10)

–

–

(19)

–

–

–

–

238

(19)

–

–

(21)

–

–

198

184

(5)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

179

(2)

–

–

(80)

–

–

97

Total

4,888

(143)

137

1

(169)

41

7

(28)

67

4,801

(163)

80

1

457

(20)

–

–

(47)

23

–

–

–

413

(48)

–

–

(16)

(140)

–

–

9

5

349

4,593

At 31 December 2020

2,094

1,104

All figures in £ millions

Amortisation

At 1 January 2019

Exchange differences

Charge for the year

Impairment charge

Disposals

Transfer from property, plant and equipment

Transfer to intangible assets – pre-publication

At 31 December 2019

Exchange differences

Charge for the year

Impairment charge

Disposals

At 31 December 2020

Carrying amounts

At 1 January 2019

At 31 December 2019

At 31 December 2020

Acquired 
customer 
lists, 
contracts and 
relationships

Goodwill

Software

Acquired 
trademarks 
and brands

Acquired 
publishing 
rights

Other 
intangibles 
acquired

Total

(512)

16

(115)

–

10

(3)

16

(588)

18

(112)

–

6

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(647)

(181)

(178)

(361)

(1,879)

22

(51)

–

88

–

–

7

(11)

(12)

19

–

–

4

(2)

–

–

–

–

19

(22)

(53)

46

–

–

68

(201)

(65)

163

(3)

16

(588)

(178)

(176)

(371)

(1,901)

23

(44)

(2)

17

13

(14)

–

21

(676)

(594)

(158)

2,111

2,139

2,094

447

451

428

263

205

157

86

60

40

2

(2)

–

81

(95)

6

3

2

46

(8)

(10)

15

102

(180)

(12)

140

(328)

(1,851)

96

42

21

3,009

2,900

2,742

The 2019 amortisation table has been restated to show the £65m impairment charge separately from the charge for the year. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information166

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

11. Intangible assets continued

Goodwill

The goodwill carrying value of £2,094m relates to acquisitions 
completed after 1 January 1998. Prior to 1 January 1998, all goodwill  
was written off to reserves on the date of acquisition. For acquisitions 
completed between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, no value 
was ascribed to intangibles other than goodwill which was amortised 
over a period of up to 20 years. On adoption of IFRS on 1 January 2003, 
the Group chose not to restate the goodwill balance and at that date 
the balance was frozen (i.e. amortisation ceased). If goodwill had been 
restated, then a significant value would have been ascribed to other 
intangible assets, which would be subject to amortisation, and the 
carrying value of goodwill would be significantly lower. For acquisitions 
completed after 1 January 2003, value has been ascribed to other 
intangible assets which are amortised.

Other intangible assets

Other intangibles acquired include technology and process rights.

Intangible assets are valued separately for each acquisition and  
the primary method of valuation used is the discounted cash flow  
method. The majority of acquired intangibles are amortised using  
an amortisation profile based on the projected cash flows underlying  
the acquisition date valuation of the intangible asset, which generally 
results in a larger proportion of amortisation being recognised in the 
early years of the asset’s life. The Group keeps the expected pattern  
of consumption under review.

Amortisation of £22m (2019: £19m) is included in the income statement 
in cost of goods sold and £158m (2019: £182m) in operating expenses. 
Impairment of £12m (2019: £65m), of which £2m (2019: £nil) relates  
to customer lists, contracts and relationships, £nil (2019: £12m) to 
acquired trademarks and brands and £10m (2019: £53m) to other 
intangibles acquired, is included in operating expenses.

The range of useful economic lives for each major class of intangible asset (excluding goodwill and software) is shown below:

Class of intangible asset

Acquired customer lists, contracts and relationships

Acquired trademarks and brands

Acquired publishing rights

Other intangibles acquired

The expected amortisation profile of acquired intangible assets is shown below:

All figures in £ millions

Class of intangible asset

Acquired customer lists, contracts and relationships

Acquired trademarks and brands

Acquired publishing rights

Other intangibles acquired

2020

Useful economic life

3–20 years

2–20 years

5–20 years

2–20 years

One to  
five years

Six to  
ten years

More than  
ten years

116

30

2

13

40

9

–

8

1

1

–

–

2020

Total

157

40

2

21

Impairment tests for cash-generating units (CGUs) containing goodwill

Impairment tests have been carried out where appropriate as described below. Goodwill was allocated to CGUs, or an aggregation of CGUs, 
where goodwill could not be reasonably allocated to individual business units. CGUs have been revised in 2019 and 2020. Impairment reviews 
were conducted on these revised CGUs as summarised below: 

2020 CGUs

All figures in £ millions

North American Courseware

OPM

Virtual Schools

Assessments

International (includes the separate CGUs of Brazil, China, India and South Africa)

Total

2020

2019

Goodwill

Goodwill

–

18

374

1,002

700

2,094

–

18

386

1,035

700

2,139

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment. The recoverable amount of each aggregated CGU is based on the higher of value in use and 
fair value less costs of disposal. The impairment assessment is based on value in use with the exception of Pearson Institute of Higher Education 
as explained below. Other than goodwill there are no intangible assets with indefinite lives. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information167

11. Intangible assets continued

K E Key areas of estimation

  The recoverability of goodwill balances. Key assumptions used in 
goodwill impairment testing are discount rates, perpetuity growth 
rates, forecast sales growth rates and forecast operating profits. 

No impairments of goodwill were recorded in 2020. Impairment 
charges of £12m have been recognised in relation to acquired 
intangibles. In 2019, following a reassessment of the relative risk in  
the Brazil CGU compared to Pearson as a whole, it was determined in 
the course of the impairment review that neither the value in use nor 
the fair value less costs of disposal of the Brazil CGU supported the 
carrying value of the CGU. As the goodwill related to the Brazil CGU  
was fully impaired in prior years, the acquired intangibles of the Brazil 
CGU were impaired by £65m, bringing their carrying value to £27m. 

Determination of CGUs and reallocation of goodwill

Pearson identifies its CGUs based on its operating model and how  
data is collected and reviewed for management reporting and strategic 
planning purposes in accordance with IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’.  
In 2019, the CGUs and aggregation of CGUs was revised to take account 
of the following:

  The implementation of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) 
system in North America meant that ledgers are structured on a legal 
entity basis rather than the previous divisional basis. This has meant 
it is no longer possible to identify the carrying values of the Pearson 
VUE business separately from the wider Assessments business.  
As a result, the Pearson VUE business has been combined with  
the Assessments business as one CGU for impairment testing 

  The disposal of the US K-12 business in 2019 caused management to 
disaggregate the North America CGU. 

At 1 January 2019, the goodwill of the previous North America  
and Pearson VUE CGUs was therefore reallocated between North 
American Courseware, OPM, Virtual Schools and Assessments,  
based on their relative fair value at 1 January 2019 amended to take 
into account previous impairments taken. No goodwill was allocated  
to the North American Courseware CGU reflecting the significant 
impairments taken in 2015 and 2016.

In 2020, due to the new structure of the business and the consequent 
change in management responsibilities, the Other Growth aggregation 
of CGUs has been combined with the Core aggregation to form a larger 
aggregation as Other International. The Other Growth aggregation  
had no goodwill or intangibles prior to the combination.

Furthermore, the cash flows and assets related to Pearson Institute of 
Higher Education (PIHE) were extracted from the South Africa CGU and 
assessed on a fair value less costs to sell basis reflecting the expected 
disposal of PIHE.

Key assumptions

For the purpose of estimating the value in use of the CGUs, 
management has used an income approach based on present  
value techniques. The calculations use cash flow projections  
based on financial budgets approved by management covering a  
three-year period. 

Previously, longer forecast periods for OPM were used, however, 
profitability improvements in the OPM division mean that it is currently 
sensible to use a three year analysis, consistent with the rest of the 
Group. OPM relies on contracts with key customers and the forecasts 
used assume these are renewed or replaced. 

The key assumptions used by management in the value in use 
calculations were:

Discount rates – The discount rate is based on the risk-free rate  
for government bonds, adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the 
increased risk in investing in equities. The risk premium adjustment  
is assessed for each CGU. The average pre-tax discount rates range 
from 9.3% to 17.2% (2019: pre-tax 9.5% to 17%). Discount rates are 
lower for those businesses which operate in more mature markets 
with low inflation and higher for those operating in emerging markets  
with higher inflation. 

Perpetuity growth rates – The perpetuity growth rates are based on 
inflation trends. A perpetuity growth rate of 2% (2019: 2%) was used  
for cash flows subsequent to the approved budget period for CGUs 
operating in mature markets. This perpetuity growth rate is a 
conservative rate and is considered to be lower than the long-term 
historical growth rates of the underlying territories in which the CGU 
operates and the long-term growth rate prospects of the sectors in 
which the CGU operates. CGU growth rates between 2.2% to 4.5% 
(2019: 3.2% to 6.5%) were used for cash flows subsequent to the 
approved budget period for CGUs operating in emerging markets  
with high inflation. These growth rates are also generally below the 
long-term historical growth rates in these markets. 

The key assumptions used by management in setting the financial 
budgets were as follows:

Forecast sales growth rates – Forecast sales growth rates are based  
on past experience adjusted for the strategic direction and near-term 
investment priorities within each CGU. Key assumptions include 
continued growth in OPM and Virtual Schools, ongoing pressures in  
the US Higher Education Courseware market, and recovery across all of 
our other CGUs following the impacts of COVID-19 in 2020. The sales 
forecasts use average nominal growth rates between 11% and 17% for 
emerging businesses in mature markets (2019: 6% and 11%) and 0% 
and 13% for mature businesses in mature markets (2019: (5)% and 4%) 
and between 2% and 18% (2019: 5% and 11%) for emerging markets 
with high inflation. These growth rates between 2021 and 2023 are 
inflated due to the impact of COVID-19 on sales in 2020. For those 
businesses that declined in 2020 the normalised growth rate using 
2019 actuals as the starting point would be between (4)% and 3% for 
mature businesses in mature markets and between (4)% and 4% in 
emerging markets.

Operating profits – Operating profits are forecast based on historical 
experience of operating margins, adjusted for the impact of changes to 
product costs, committed restructuring plans, strategic developments 
and new business cases to the extent they have been formally 
approved prior to the balance sheet date. Management applies 
judgement in allocating corporate costs on a reasonable and consistent 
basis in order to determine operating profit at a CGU level. Forecasts 
include assumptions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed 
that restrictions ease in Q2 2021 with a phased return to normality in 
H2 2021 as the vaccine roll-out progresses. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information168

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

11. Intangible assets continued

Key assumptions continued

The table below shows the key assumptions for those CGUs for which the carrying value of goodwill is significant in comparison to the total 
carrying value of goodwill: 

Virtual Schools

Other International

Assessments

Sensitivities

Discount rate

Perpetuity
growth rate

9.5%

9.3%

9.5%

2.0%

2.2%

2.0%

Impairment testing for the year ended 31 December 2020 has identified the following CGUs, or groups of CGUs, as being sensitive to reasonably 
possible changes in key assumptions. The table below shows the headroom at 31 December 2020 and the changes in the key assumptions 
required in order for the recoverable amount to equal the carrying value.

North American Courseware

OPM

Brazil

Other International

*  CGU contribution is operating profit excluding corporate overheads.

12. Investments in joint ventures and associates
The amounts recognised in the balance sheet are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Associates

Associates classified as held for sale

Total

The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Associates

Total

Headroom at  
31 December 

2020  Discount rate 

Discount rate 
for zero 
headroom 

Perpetuity 
growth rate 

Perpetuity 
growth rate 
for zero 
headroom 

Contribution*
reduction p.a.  
for zero 
headroom

£424m

£176m

£42m

£368m

9.5%

9.5%

13.6%

9.3%

10.7%

11.4%

16.2%

10.5%

2.0%

2.0%

3.5%

2.2%

1.0%

0.3%

1.5%

1.3%

£32m

£13m

£5m

£27m

2020

6

–

6

2019

7

397

404

2020

2019

5

5

54

54

The Group has no material associates or joint ventures. 

The Group’s 25% interest in Penguin Random House was disposed of in April 2020 (see note 31). At 31 December 2019, the Group’s share of the 
assets of Penguin Random House were classified as held for sale on the balance sheet (see note 32). Funds loaned to Penguin Random House 
were repaid at the point of disposal. Prior to the completion of the sale of Penguin Random House, the Group received dividends of £1m  
(2019: £64m) from Penguin Random House.

There were no other material transactions with associates or joint ventures during 2020. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information169

13. Deferred income tax

All figures in £ millions

Deferred income tax assets

Deferred income tax liabilities

Net deferred income tax (liability)/asset

2020

2019

32

(62)

(30)

59

(48)

11

Substantially all of the deferred income tax assets are expected to be recovered after more than one year.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities shall be offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current income tax assets with current 
income tax liabilities and where the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority. At 31 December 2020, the Group has gross tax 
losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognised of £166m (2019: £168m) in respect of UK losses, £369m (2019: £362m) in respect of US losses 
and approximately £300m (2019: £315m) in respect of losses in other territories. The UK losses are capital losses which can be carried forward 
indefinitely. The US losses relate to federal and state taxes. Federal tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely; certain state tax losses may 
have expiry periods between one and 20 years. 

Other gross deductible temporary differences for which no deferred tax asset is recognised total £56m (2019: £82m). As at 31 December 2020, 
£27m of tax losses and other deductible temporary differences included in the disclosed amounts above had been offered in settlement of 
various tax assessments in India

The amount of temporary differences associated with subsidiaries for which no deferred tax has been provided is not material

Deferred income tax assets of £20m (2019: £41m) have been recognised in countries that reported a tax loss in either the current or preceding 
year. The majority arises in Brazil in respect of tax deductible goodwill. It is considered more likely than not that there will be sufficient future 
taxable profits to realise these assets.

The recognition of the deferred income tax assets is supported by management’s forecasts of the future profitability of the relevant countries.  
In some cases deferred income tax assets are forecast to be recovered through taxable profits over a period that exceeds five years. Management 
consider these forecasts are sufficiently reliable to support the recovery of the assets. Where there are insufficient forecasts of future profits, 
deferred income tax assets have not been recognised.

The movement in deferred income tax assets and liabilities during the year is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Deferred income tax assets/(liabilities)

At 1 January 2019

Exchange differences

Income statement benefit/(charge)

Tax benefit/(charge) in other  
comprehensive income

Tax charge in equity

At 31 December 2019

Exchange differences

Income statement (charge)/benefit

(44)

(12)

Tax benefit/(charge) in other  
comprehensive income

At 31 December 2020

–

47

–

8

Trading 
losses

Returns 
provisions

Retirement 
benefit 
obligations

Deferred 
revenue

Goodwill and 
intangibles

Interest 
limitations

Other

Total 

20

(1)

70

–

–

89

2

31

(1)

(10)

–

–

20

–

(55)

(1)

(4)

22

–

(38)

(1)

(12)

2

(49)

68

(3)

(24)

–

–

41

(2)

6

–

45

(205)

6

–

–

–

(199)

2

(12)

–

(209)

28

(2)

31

–

–

57

(4)

23

–

76

52

(3)

1

(4)

(5)

41

(5)

21

(5)

52

(61)

(5)

64

18

(5)

11

(8)

(30)

(3)

(30)

Other deferred income tax items include temporary differences in respect of share-based payments, provisions, depreciation and  
royalty advances.

As at 31 December 2020, no deferred income tax assets or liabilities were classified as held for sale (2019: £nil). 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information170

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

14. Classification of financial instruments
The accounting classification of each class of the Group’s financial assets, and their carrying values, is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Notes

FVOCI

FVTPL

2020

Amortised 
cost

Financial 
assets

Total 
carrying 
value

Fair value

Fair value – 
hedging 
instrument

2019

Amortised 
cost

Financial 
assets

Total 
carrying 
value

Fair value

Fair value – 
hedging 
instrument

FVOCI

FVTPL

Investments in  
unlisted securities

Cash and cash equivalents1 

Derivative financial 
instruments

Trade receivables

Investment in finance  
lease receivable

Other receivable

Total financial assets

15

17

16

22

22

22

138

–

–

–

–

–

138

–

93

2

–

–

96

191

–

–

61

–

–

–

–

138

122

1,004

1,097

–

803

130

–

63

803

130

96

–

–

–

–

–

61

1,937

2,327

122

–

48

6

–

–

182

236

–

–

48

–

–

–

–

389

–

918

196

–

122

437

54

918

196

182

48

1,503

1,909

1 

In 2019, cash and cash equivalents of £48m have been reclassified from amortised cost to FVTPL (classified as level 1) as they relate to money market funds.

The carrying value of the Group’s financial assets is equal to, or approximately equal to, the market value. The other receivable relates to the 
receivable which arose on the disposal of the US K-12 business and is included in other receivables, non-current and current, in note 22.

The accounting classification of each class of the Group’s financial liabilities, together with their carrying values and market values, is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Notes

FVTPL

2020

2019

Fair value

Fair value – 
hedging 
instrument

Amortised 
cost

Other 
financial 
liabilities

Total 
carrying 
value

Total 
market 
value

FVTPL

Fair value

Fair value – 
hedging 
instrument

Amortised 
cost

Other 
financial 
liabilities

Total 
carrying 
value

Total 
market 
value

Derivative financial 
instruments

Trade payables

Bank loans and overdrafts

Other borrowings due  
within one year

Borrowings due after more 
than one year

16

24

18

18

18

(30)

(22)

–

(52)

(52)

(7)

(32)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(340)

(340)

(340)

(3)

(3)

(3)

(251)

(251)

(249)

(1,397)

(1,397)

(1,451)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(358)

(3)

(39)

(358)

(3)

(39)

(358)

(3)

(89)

(89)

(89)

(1,572)

(1,572)

(1,574)

Total financial liabilities

(30)

(22)

(1,991)

(2,043)

(2,095)

(7)

(32)

(2,022)

(2,061)

(2,063)

The market value of leases has been stated at book value.

Fair value measurement 

As shown above, the Group’s derivative assets and liabilities, unlisted securities and marketable securities are held at fair value. Financial 
instruments that are measured subsequently to initial recognition at fair value are grouped into levels 1 to 3, based on the degree to which the  
fair value is observable, as follows:

Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 

Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs, other than quoted prices included within level 1, that are observable for the  
asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices). 

Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on 
observable market data (unobservable inputs). 

The Group’s bonds valued at £965m (2019: £595m) and money market funds of £93m (2019: £48m) included within cash and cash equivalents  
are classified as level 1. The Group’s derivative assets valued at £63m (2019: £54m) and derivative liabilities valued at £52m (2019: £39m) are 
classified as level 2. The Group’s investments in unlisted securities are valued at £138m (2019: £122m) and the other receivable is valued at £96m 
(2019: £182m); both are classified as level 3.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information171

14. Classification of financial instruments continued
The following table analyses the movements in level 3 fair value remeasurements:

All figures in £ millions

At beginning of year

Exchange differences

Acquisition of investments and other receivable

Repayment

Fair value movements

At end of year

 Other 
receivable

Investments  
in unlisted 
securities

182

(7)

–

(105)

26

96

122

(4)

6

–

14

138

2020

2019

Total

304

(11)

6

(105)

40

234

Total

93

(2)

193

–

20

304

The fair value of the investments in unlisted securities is determined by reference to the financial performance of the underlying asset,  
recent funding rounds and amounts realised on the sale of similar assets.

The fair value of the other receivable, which arose on the disposal of the US K-12 business, is determined using present value techniques whereby 
the expected value of future cash flows is discounted using a rate which is representative of the creditworthiness of the US K-12 business. 

15. Other financial assets

All figures in £ millions

At beginning of year

Exchange differences

Acquisition of investments

Fair value movements

At end of year

2020

122

(4)

6

14

138

2019

93

(3)

12

20

122

Other financial assets are unlisted securities of £138m (2019: £122m) that are classified at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI). 
The assets, which are not held for trading, relate to the Group’s interests in new and innovative educational ventures across the world. These are 
strategic investments and the Group considers the classification as FVOCI to be more relevant. None of the investments are individually significant 
to the financial statements. 

16. Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
The Group’s approach to the management of financial risks is set out in note 19. The Group’s outstanding derivative financial instruments are  
as follows: 

All figures in £ millions

Interest rate derivatives – in a fair value hedge relationship

Interest rate derivatives – not in a hedge relationship

Cross-currency rate derivatives – in a hedge relationship

FX derivatives – in a hedge relationship

FX derivatives – not in a hedge relationship

Total

Analysed as expiring:

In less than one year

Later than one year and not later than five years

Later than five years

Total

Gross notional 
amounts

Assets

Liabilities

Gross notional 
amounts

Assets

Liabilities

2020

2019

354

550

516

193

361

1,974

1,238

663

73

1,974

12

–

44

5

2

63

18

45

–

63

–

(27)

(20)

(2)

(3)

(52)

(12)

(32)

(8)

(52)

336

557

502

555

386

2,336

1,167

694

475

2,336

13

2

29

6

4

54

25

13

16

54

–

(6)

(31)

(1)

(1)

(39)

(15)

(6)

(18)

(39)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information172

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

16. Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued
The Group’s treasury policies only allow derivatives to be traded  
where the objective is risk mitigation. These are then designated for 
hedge accounting using the following criteria:

Fair value hedges

The Group uses interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps as  
fair value hedges of the Group’s euro issued debt. 

Interest rate exposure arises from movements in the fair value of the 
Group’s euro debt attributable to movements in euro interest rates. 
The hedged risk is the change in the euro bonds fair value attributable  
to interest rate movements. The hedged items are the Group’s euro 
bonds which are issued at a fixed rate. The hedging instruments are 
fixed to floating euro interest rate swaps where the Group receives 
fixed interest payments and pays three month Euribor. 

As the critical terms of the interest rate swaps match the bonds, there 
is an expectation that the value of the hedging instrument and the 
value of the hedged item will move in the opposite direction as a result 
of movements in the zero coupon Euribor curve. The hedge ratio is 
therefore expected to be 100%. Potential sources of hedge 
ineffectiveness are a reduction or modification in the hedged item  
or a material change in the credit risk of swap counterparties. 

A foreign currency exposure arises from foreign exchange fluctuations 
on translation of the Group’s euro debt into GBP. The hedged risk is the 
risk of changes in the GBPEUR spot rate that will result in changes in the 
value of the euro debt when translated into GBP. The hedged items  
are a portion of the Group’s euro bonds. The hedging instruments are 
floating to floating cross currency swaps which mitigates an exposure 
to the effect of euro strengthening against GBP within the hedge item. 
The final exchange on the cross currency swap creates an exposure to 
euro weakening against GBP.

As the critical terms of the cross-currency swap match the bonds  
there is an expectation that the value of the hedging instrument  
and the value of the hedged item move in the opposite direction  
as a result of movements in the EURGBP exchange rate. The hedge 
ratio is 100%. Potential sources of hedge ineffectiveness are a 
reduction or modification in the hedged item or a material change  
in the credit risk of swap counterparties. 

The Group held the following instruments to hedge exposures to 
changes in interest rates and foreign currency risk associated  
with borrowings:

   Where interest rate and cross currency interest rate swaps are  
used to convert fixed rate debt to floating and we expect to receive 
inflows equal to the fixed rate debt interest, these are classified as  
fair value hedges

  Where derivatives are used to create a future foreign currency liability 
to provide protection against currency movements affecting the 
valuation of an overseas investment, these are designated as a net 
investment hedge

  If the derivative and the underlying hedged exposure would normally  
be revalued through the income statement and valuation changes 
are expected to be perfectly or near perfectly equal and opposite, 
these will not be classified in a hedge relationship.

The Group’s fixed rate USD debt is held as fixed rate instruments at 
amortised cost.

The majority of the Group’s fixed rate euro debt is converted to a 
floating rate exposure using interest rate and cross-currency swaps. 
The Group receives interest under its euro debt related swap contracts 
to match the interest on the bonds (ranging from a receipt of 1.375%  
on its euro 2025 notes to 1.875% on its euro 2021 notes) and, in turn, 
pays either a floating US dollar or sterling variable rates of GBP LIBOR + 
0.81% and US Libor + 1.36%. 

GBP and USD interest rate swaps are subsequently used to fix  
an element of the interest charge. The all-in rates (including the  
spread above LIBOR) that the Group pays are between 1.9% and 3.6%. 
In addition to this, the Group has executed additional interest rate 
swaps to offset the floating rate borrowings paying between 0.87% and 
2.1%. At 31 December 2020, the Group had interest rate swap contracts 
to fix £550m of debt and a further £595m of outstanding fixed rate  
bonds, bringing the total fixed rate debt to £1,145m. These fixed 
interest rate derivatives are not designated in hedging relationships. 
Additionally, the Group uses FX derivatives including forwards, collars 
and cross currency swaps to create synthetic USD debt as a hedge of  
its USD assets and to achieve certainty of USD currency conversion 
rates, in line with the Group’s FX hedging policy. Outstanding contracts 
as at 31 December 2020 were held at an average GBP/USD rate of  
1.36. The Group also uses FX derivatives to create synthetic BRL debt  
as a hedge of BRL assets, these are held at an average GBP/BRL rate  
of 7.53. These derivatives are in designated net investment hedging 
relationships. The weighted average rate achieved for the bonds in a 
net investment hedge relationship was GBP/USD 1.59 for the USD 
bonds and EUR/GBP 0.86 for the euro bonds. Outstanding contracts  
on the cross currency swaps at 31 December 2020 were held at an 
average EUR/GBP rate of 0.79. These derivatives are in designated fair 
value hedging relationships.

The Group’s portfolio of rate derivatives is diversified by maturity, 
counterparty and type. Natural offsets between transactions  
within the portfolio and the designation of certain derivatives as 
hedges significantly reduce the risk of income statement volatility.  
The sensitivity of the portfolio to changes in market rates is set out  
in note 19.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information173

16. Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued

All figures in £ millions

Derivative financial instruments for interest rate risk

Derivative financial instruments for currency risk

All figures in £ millions

Derivative financial instruments for interest rate risk

Derivative financial instruments for currency risk

The amounts at the reporting date relating to items designated as hedge items were as follows:

Carrying amount of 
hedging instruments

Change in fair value of 
hedging instrument 
used to determine 
hedge ineffectiveness

Nominal amounts of 
hedging instruments

2020

12

44

–

19

354

354

2019

Carrying amount of 
hedging instruments

Change in fair value of 
hedging instrument 
used to determine 
hedge ineffectiveness

Nominal amounts of 
hedging instruments

13

25

–

(21)

336

336

2020

All figures in £ millions

Interest rate risk

Financial liabilities – borrowings 

Currency risk

Financial liabilities – borrowings

All figures in £ millions

Interest rate risk

Financial liabilities – borrowings 

Currency risk

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Accumulated amount 
of fair value hedge 
adjustments on the 
hedged item included 
in the carrying 
amount 

Change in fair value of 
hedged item used to 
determine hedge 
ineffectiveness

Carrying amount of 
hedged items

Hedge  
ineffectiveness

Line item in profit or 
loss that includes 
hedge ineffectiveness

(367)

(367)

(9)

n/a

–

(19)

–

–

n/a

n/a

2019

Accumulated amount 
of fair value hedge 
adjustments on  
the hedged item 
included in the 
carrying amount 

Change in fair value of 
hedged item used to 
determine hedge 
ineffectiveness

Carrying amount of 
hedged items

Hedge  
ineffectiveness

Line item in profit or 
loss that includes 
hedge ineffectiveness

(347)

(347)

(9)

n/a

–

21

–

–

n/a

n/a

Hedge of net investment in a foreign operation 

A foreign currency exposure arises from the translation of the Group’s net investments in its subsidiaries which have USD, EUR and BRL functional 
currencies. The hedged risk is the risk of changes in the GBPUSD, GBPEUR and GBPBRL spot rates that will result in changes in the value of the 
Group’s net investment in its USD, EUR and BRL assets when translated into GBP. The hedged items are a portion of the Group’s assets which  
are denominated in USD, EUR and BRL. The hedging instruments are debt and derivative financial instruments, including Cross Currency Swaps, 
FX forwards (including non-deliverable forwards) and FX collars which mitigates an exposure to the effect of a weakening USD, EUR or BRL on the 
hedged item against GBP.

It is expected that the change in value of each of these items will mirror each other as there is a clear and direct economic relationship between 
the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the hedge relationship.

Hedge ineffectiveness would arise if the value of the hedged items fell below the value of the hedging instruments, however, this is unlikely  
as the value of the Group’s assets denominated in USD, EUR and BRL are significantly greater than the proposed net investment programme.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information174

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

16. Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting continued
The amounts related to items designated as hedging instruments were as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Derivative financial instruments

Financial liabilities – borrowings

All figures in £ millions

Derivative financial instruments

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Change in  
value of hedging 
instrument used 
to determine 
hedge 
ineffectiveness 

Nominal 
amounts  
of hedging 
instruments

Hedging  
gains/(losses) 
recognised in 
OCI

Hedge 
ineffectiveness 
recognised in  
profit or loss

2020

3

1

(355)

 (246)

3

1

–

–

2019

Change in  
value of hedging 
instrument used 
to determine 
hedge 
ineffectiveness 

Nominal 
amounts  
of hedging 
instruments

Hedging  
gains/(losses) 
recognised in 
OCI

Hedge 
ineffectiveness 
recognised in  
profit or loss

13

10

(722)

(246)

13

10

–

–

Carrying 
amount of 
hedging 
instruments

(17)

(246)

Carrying 
amount of 
hedging 
instruments

(21)

(246)

In addition to the above, £15m (2019: £3m) of hedging gains were recognised in OCI in relation to derivative financial instruments that matured 
during the year. A total of £14m (2019: £nil) of losses accumulated in translation reserve are reclassified to profit and loss as a result of the  
disposal of Penguin Random House in April 2020. Included in the translation reserve is a cost of hedging reserve relating to the time value of  
FX collars which is not separately disclosed due to materiality. Value of that reserve will decrease over the life of the hedge transaction. Balance  
as at 1 January and 31 December 2020 was £2m.

Offsetting arrangements with derivative counterparties

All of the Group’s derivative financial instruments are subject to enforceable netting arrangements with individual counterparties, allowing net 
settlement in the event of default of either party. Derivative financial assets and liabilities subject to offsetting arrangements are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Counterparties in an asset position

Counterparties in a liability position

Total as presented in the balance sheet

2020

2019

Gross  
derivative  
assets

Gross  
derivative 
liabilities

Net derivative 
assets/  
liabilities

Gross  
derivative  
assets

Gross  
derivative 
liabilities

Net derivative 
assets/  
liabilities

35

28

63

(10)

(42)

(52)

25

(14)

11

52

2

54

(34)

(5)

(39)

18

(3)

15

All of the Group’s derivative financial instruments are subject to enforceable netting arrangements with individual counterparties, allowing net 
settlement in the event of default of either party. Offset arrangements in respect of cash balances are described in note 17.

Counterparty exposure from all derivatives is managed, together with that from deposits and bank account balances, within credit limits that 
reflect published credit ratings and by reference to other market measures (e.g. market prices for credit default swaps) to ensure that there is  
no significant exposure to any one counterparty’s credit risk.

The Group has no material embedded derivatives that are required to be separately accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’. 

17. Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts)

All figures in £ millions

Cash at bank and in hand

Short-term bank deposits

2020

599

498

1,097

2019

401

36

437

Short-term bank deposits are invested with banks and earn interest at the prevailing short-term deposit rates.

At the end of 2020, the currency split of cash and cash equivalents was US dollar 14% (2019: 30%), sterling 64% (2019: 12%), and other 22%  
(2019: 58%). 

Cash and cash equivalents have fair values that approximate to their carrying value due to their short-term nature. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information175

17. Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts) continued
Cash and cash equivalents include the following for the purpose of the cash flow statement:

All figures in £ millions

Cash and cash equivalents

Bank overdrafts

2020

1,116

(3)

1,113

2019

437

(3)

434

The cash and cash equivalents balance of £1,116m includes £19m (2019: nil) classified as held for sale. The Group has certain cash pooling 
arrangements in US dollars, Sterling, Euro and Canadian dollars where both the company and the bank have a legal right of offset. Offsetting 
amounts are presented gross in the balance sheet. Offset arrangements in respect of derivatives are shown in note 16.

18. Financial liabilities – borrowings
The Group’s current and non-current borrowings are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Non-current

1.875% euro notes 2021 (nominal amount €195m)

3.75% US dollar notes 2022 (nominal amount $117m)

3.25% US dollar notes 2023 (nominal amount $94m)

1.375% euro notes 2025 (nominal amount €300m)

3.75% gbp notes 2030 (nominal amount £350m)

Revolving credit facility

Lease liabilities (see note 35)

Current (due within one year or on demand)

Bank loans and overdrafts

1.875% euro notes 2021 (nominal amount €195m)

Lease liabilities (see note 35)

Total borrowings

2020

2019

–

86

69

279

353

–

610

170

89

72

262

–

230

749

1,397

1,572

3

178

73

254

3

–

89

92

1,651

1,664

Included in the non-current borrowings above is £11m of accrued interest (2019: £5m). Included in the current borrowings above is £2m of 
accrued interest (2019: £nil). In addition to the above, there are non-current borrowings of £66m (2019: £nil) and current borrowings of £3m 
(2019: £nil) classified as held for sale (see note 32). The maturities of the Group’s non-current borrowings are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Between one and two years

Between two and five years

Over five years

The carrying amounts and market values of borrowings are as follows:

2020

160

531

706

2019

251

609

712

1,397

1,572

All figures in £ millions

Bank loans and overdrafts

1.875% euro notes 2021

3.75% US dollar notes 2022

3.25% US dollar notes 2023

1.375% euro notes 2025

3.75% gbp notes 2030

Revolving credit facility

Effective  
interest rate

Carrying  
value

Market  
value

Effective  
interest rate

Carrying  
value

2020

n/a

2.04%

3.94%

3.36%

1.44%

3.93%

n/a

3

178

86

69

279

353

–

968

3

176

88

71

278

404

–

1,020

n/a

2.04%

3.94%

3.36%

1.44%

–

1.075%

3

170

89

72

262

–

230

826

2019

Market  
value

3

170

90

72

263

–

230

828

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information176

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

18. Financial liabilities – borrowings continued
The market values stated above are based on clean market prices at the year end or, where these are not available, on the quoted market prices of 
comparable debt issued by other companies. The effective interest rates above relate to the underlying debt instruments.

The carrying amounts of the Group’s borrowings before the effect of derivatives (see notes 16 and 19 for further information on the impact of 
derivatives) are denominated in the following currencies:

All figures in £ millions

US dollar

Sterling

Euro

Other

2020

458

686

472

35

2019

539

576

442

107

1,651

1,664

The Group has $1.19bn (£0.9bn) of undrawn capacity on its committed borrowing facilities as at 31 December 2020 (2019: $0.9bn (£0.7bn) 
undrawn). In addition, there are a number of short-term facilities that are utilised in the normal course of business. All of the Group’s borrowings 
are unsecured. In respect of lease obligations, the rights to the leased asset revert to the lessor in the event of default.

19. Financial risk management
The Group’s approach to the management of financial risks together 
with sensitivity analyses of its financial instruments is set out below.

  To continue to invest in the business organically and  
through acquisitions;

Treasury policy

 To have a sustainable and progressive dividend policy; and

Pearson’s treasury policies set out the Group’s principles for 
addressing key financial risks including capital risk, liquidity risk,  
foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk, and sets out measurable 
targets for each. The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports 
incorporating compliance with measurable targets and review,  
and approve, any changes to treasury policies annually.

The treasury function is permitted to use derivatives where their  
use reduces a risk or allows a transaction to be undertaken more  
cost effectively. Derivatives permitted include swaps, forwards and  
collars to manage foreign exchange and interest rate risk, with foreign 
exchange swap and forward contracts the most commonly executed. 
Speculative transactions are not permitted.

Capital risk 

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are: 

  To maintain a strong balance sheet and a solid investment  
grade rating;

  To return surplus cash to our shareholders where appropriate.  
In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the Group took a decision  
to suspend the share buyback programme, which helped to  
preserve liquidity and maintain the Group’s credit metrics.  
In May 2020 Standard and Poor’s downgraded the Group to BBB- 
(stable) (2019: BBB (negative outlook)) and in August 2020 Moody’s 
downgraded the Group to Baa3 (stable) (2019: Baa2 (stable outlook)), 
reflecting weaker anticipated results for 2020 as a result of COVID-19. 
It is anticipated that sales and profit growth will improve the Group’s 
credit position following the end of widespread social distancing and 
lockdown measures in the Group’s major markets.

The Group aimed to maintain net debt at a level less than 1.5 times 
adjusted EBITDA before the adoption of IFRS 16 and less than 2.2 times  
adjusted EBITDA after the adoption of IFRS 16. This is consistent  
with a solid investment-grade rating (assuming no material 
deterioration in trading performance) and provides comfortable 
headroom against covenants. 

Net debt

The Group’s net debt position is set out below:

All figures in £ millions

Cash and cash equivalents

Derivative financial instruments

Bank loans and overdrafts

Bonds

Revolving credit facility

Investment in finance lease receivable

Lease liabilities

Net debt

2020

1,116

11

(3)

(965)

–

130

(752)

(463)

2019

437

15

(3)

(593)

(230)

196

(838)

(1,016)

Net debt presented above includes borrowings of £69m (2019: nil) and cash and cash equivalents of £19m (2019: nil) which are included in assets 
and liabilities held for sale. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information177

19. Financial risk management continued

Interest and foreign exchange rate management

The Group’s principal currency exposure is to the US dollar which represents more than 60% of the Group’s sales. 

The Group’s long-term debt is primarily held in US dollars to provide a natural hedge of this exposure, which is achieved through issued US dollar 
debt or converting euro debt to US dollars using cross-currency swaps, forwards and collars. As at 31 December 2020, the Group’s debt of  
£1,651m is all held at fixed rates (2019: fixed rates: £1,641m, floating rates: £23m). 

See note 16 for details of the Group’s hedging programme which addresses interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. 

Overseas profits are converted to sterling to satisfy sterling cash outflows such as dividends at the prevailing spot rate at the time of the 
transaction. To the extent the Group has sufficient sterling, US dollars may be held as dollar cash to provide a natural offset to the Group’s debt  
or to satisfy future US dollar cash outflows.

The Group does not have significant cross-border foreign exchange transactional exposures. 

As at 31 December 2020, the sensitivity of the carrying value of the Group’s financial instruments to fluctuations in interest rates and exchange 
rates is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Investments in unlisted securities

Other receivable

Cash and cash equivalents

Derivative financial instruments

Bonds

Other borrowings

Investment in finance lease receivable

Other net financial assets 

Total financial instruments

All figures in £ millions

Investments in unlisted securities

Other receivable

Cash and cash equivalents

Derivative financial instruments

Bonds

Other borrowings

Investment in finance lease receivable

Other net financial assets 

Total financial instruments

Carrying  
value

Impact of 1% 
increase in 
interest rates

Impact of 1% 
decrease in 
interest rates

Impact of 10% 
strengthening  
in sterling

Impact of 10% 
weakening in 
sterling

2020

138

96

1,097

11

(965)

(686)

130

463

284

–

–

–

17

9

–

–

–

26

–

–

–

(19)

(9)

–

–

–

(28)

(11)

(9)

(55)

3

54

62

(12)

(44)

(12)

13

11

25

1

(67)

(76)

14

40

(39)

2019

Carrying  
value

Impact of 1% 
increase in 
interest rates

Impact of 1% 
decrease in 
interest rates

Impact of 10% 
strengthening  
in sterling

Impact of 10% 
weakening in 
sterling

122

182

437

15

(593)

(1,071)

196

560

(152)

–

–

–

16

11

2

–

–

29

–

–

–

(18)

(12)

(2)

–

–

(32)

(9)

(17)

(32)

22

53

46

(18)

(43)

2

11

20

39

(23)

(64)

(56)

22

52

1

The table above shows the sensitivities of the fair values of each class 
of financial instrument to an isolated change in either interest rates  
or foreign exchange rates. Other net financial assets comprises  
trade receivables less trade payables. A significant proportion of the 
movements shown above would impact equity rather than the income 
statement due to the location and functional currency of the entities  
in which they arise and the availability of net investment hedging. 

The Group’s income statement is reported at average rates for the  
year while the balance sheet is translated at the year-end closing  
rate. Differences between these rates can distort ratio calculations 
such as debt to EBITDA and interest cover. Adjusted operating profit 
translated at year-end closing rates would be £25m lower than the 
reported figure of £313m at £288m. Adjusted EBITDA translated at 
year-end closing rates would be £38m lower than the reported figure  
of £550m at £512m.

Liquidity and re-financing risk management 

The Group regularly reviews the level of cash and debt facilities 
required to fund its activities. This involves preparing a prudent  
cash flow forecast for the next three to five years, determining the  
level of debt facilities required to fund the business, planning for 
shareholder returns and repayments of maturing debt, and identifying 
an appropriate amount of headroom to provide a reserve against 
unexpected outflows.

At 31 December 2020, the Group had cash of £1.1bn and an 
outstanding drawing of £nil on the US dollar denominated revolving 
credit facility due 2024 of $1.19bn (£0.9bn). 

The $1.19bn facility contains interest cover and leverage covenants 
which the Group has complied with for the year ended 31 December 
2020. The maturity of the carrying values of the Group’s borrowings 
and trade payables are set out in notes 18 and 24 respectively. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information178

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

19. Financial risk management continued
At the end of 2020, the currency split of the Group’s trade payables  
was US dollar £195m, sterling £76m and other currencies £69m  
(2019: US dollar £214m, sterling £57m and other currencies £87m). 
Trade payables are all due within one year (2019: all due within  
one year).

The table below analyses the Group’s bonds and derivative assets and 
liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining 
period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date.  
Short dated derivative instruments have not been included in this 
table. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual 
undiscounted cash flows (including interest) and as such may  
differ from the amounts disclosed on the balance sheet.

Financial counterparty and credit risk management

Financial counterparty and credit risk arises from cash and cash 
equivalents, favourable derivative financial instruments and deposits 
with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to 
customers, including outstanding receivables. Counterparty credit 
limits, which take published credit rating and other factors into 
account, are set to cover the Group’s total aggregate exposure to a 
single financial institution. The limits applicable to published credit 
rating bands are approved by the Chief Financial Officer within 
guidelines approved by the Board. Exposures and limits applicable  
to each financial institution are reviewed on a regular basis. 

All figures in £ millions

At 31 December 2020

Bonds

Rate derivatives – inflows

Rate derivatives – outflows

FX forwards – inflows

FX forwards – outflows

Total

At 31 December 2019

Bonds

Rate derivatives – inflows

Rate derivatives – outflows

FX forwards – inflows

FX forwards – outflows

Total

Analysed by maturity

Analysed by currency

Greater than 
one month 
and less than  
one year

Later than 
one year  
but less than 
five years

Five years  
or more

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Total

200

(186)

180

(68)

68

194

12

(19)

23

(186)

186

16

497

(350)

350

–

–

497

354

(223)

237

(24)

23

367

416

(1)

12

–

–

1,113

(537)

542

(68)

68

427

1,118

259

(332)

331

–

–

258

625

(574)

591

(210)

209

641

166

(12)

209

–

36

399

177

(41)

242

–

209

587

481

(152)

330

(68)

–

591

–

(172)

344

(210)

–

(38)

466

(373)

3

–

32

128

448

(361)

5

–

–

92

1,113

(537)

542

(68)

68

1,118

625

(574)

591

(210)

209

641

Cash deposits and derivative transactions are made with approved 
counterparties up to pre-agreed limits. To manage counterparty risk 
associated with cash and cash equivalents, the Group uses a mixture  
of money market funds as well as bank deposits. As at 31 December 
2020, 88% of cash and cash equivalents was held with investment 
grade bank counterparties, 9% with AAA money market funds  
and 3% held with non-investment grade bank counterparties. 

For trade receivables and contract assets the Group’s exposure to 
credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of  
each customer. However, risk associated with the industry and  
country in which customers operate may also influence the credit risk. 
The credit quality of customers is assessed by taking into account 
financial position, past experience and other relevant factors. 
Individual credit limits are set for each customer based on internal 
ratings. The compliance with credit limits is regularly monitored by  
the Group. A default on a trade receivable is when the counterparty 
fails to make contractual payments within the stated payment terms.  
Trade receivables and contract assets are written off when there is  
no reasonable expectation of recovery. The carrying amounts of 
financial assets, trade receivables and contract assets represent the 
maximum credit exposure.

Trade receivables and contract assets are subject to impairment using 
the expected credit loss model. The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified 
approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime 
expected credit loss allowance for all trade receivables and contract 
assets. To measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables  

and contract assets have been grouped based on shared credit risk 
characteristics and the days past due. See note 22 for further details 
about trade receivables and contract assets including movements in 
provisions for bad and doubtful debts. 

Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Interest Rate  
Benchmark Reform

In light of Interest Rate Benchmark Reform and amendments to IFRS 9 
and IFRS 7 which Pearson early adopted in 2019, the Group has 
considered the impact of IBOR reform on Pearson’s hedge accounting. 
In accordance with the transition provisions, the amendments have 
been adopted retrospectively to hedging relationships that existed at 
the start of 2019 reporting period or were designated thereafter.  
The amendments provide temporary relief from applying specific 
hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships directly 
affected by IBOR reform. 

The reliefs have the effect that IBOR reform should not generally cause 
hedge accounting to terminate. However, any hedge ineffectiveness 
continue should be recorded in the income statement. Furthermore, 
the amendments set out triggers for when the reliefs will end, which 
include the uncertainty arising from interest rate benchmark reform 
no longer being present.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information179

19. Financial risk management continued
Pearson has a limited exposure to changes in the EUR IBOR benchmark. The Group has €395m (£355m) of Interest Rate Swaps which are in fair 
value hedge relationships. Pearson has considered a IBOR transition plan. Pearson currently anticipates that the areas of greatest change will  
be amendments to the contractual terms of EUR-IBOR-referenced floating-rate swaps and updating hedge designations.

In summary, the reliefs provided by the amendments that apply to the Group are:

  In assessing whether the hedge is expected to be highly effective on a forward-looking basis, the Group has assumed that the Euribor interest 
rate on which the cash flows of the interest rate swap that hedges fixed-rate Euro bonds is not altered by IBOR reform;

  The Group will not discontinue hedge accounting during the period of IBOR-related uncertainty solely because the retrospective effectiveness 
demonstrates ineffectiveness due to IBOR reform. The Group has assessed whether the hedged Euribor risk component is a separately 
identifiable risk only when it first designates the hedge and not on an ongoing basis.

20. Intangible assets – pre-publication

All figures in £ millions

Cost

At beginning of year

Exchange differences

Additions

Disposals

Transfer from property, plant and equipment

Transfer (to)/from intangible assets

At end of year

Amortisation

At beginning of year

Exchange differences

Charge for the year

Disposals

At end of year

Carrying amounts at end of year

2020

2019

2,275

2,096

(48)

323

(31)

–

(5)

(66)

306

(82)

9

12

2,514

2,275

(1,405)

(1,279)

45

(280)

31

53

(261)

82

(1,609)

(1,405)

905

870

Included in the above are pre-publication assets amounting to £607m (2019: £585m) which will be realised in more than one year. Amortisation is 
included in the income statement in cost of goods sold. In addition to the above, in 2019 there was a £10m charge and additions of £13m relating 
to assets and liabilities held for sale (see note 32). 

K E Key areas of estimation

  The recoverability of prepublication assets and in particular the 
assessment of the useful economic lives of pre-publication assets. 
The key assumption is the estimate of future potential sales. 

Pre-publication assets are assessed for impairment triggers on an 
annual basis or when triggering events occur. In 2020, the impact of 
COVID-19 resulted in a full impairment analysis being undertaken  
on pre-publication assets. The impairment test showed that there is 
adequate headroom across all pre-publication assets and accordingly 
no impairment charges were recognised. 

21. Inventories

All figures in £ millions

Raw materials

Work in progress

Finished goods

Returns asset

2020

2019

5

2

116

6

129

5

2

155

7

169

The cost of inventories recognised as an expense and included in the income statement in cost of goods sold amounted to £219m (2019: £231m) 
including £41m (2019: £33m) of inventory provisions. None of the inventory is pledged as security.

Included within the inventory balance is the estimation of the right to receive goods from contracts with customers via returns. The value of the 
returns asset is measured at the carrying amount of the assets at the time of sale aligned to the Group’s normal inventory valuation methodology 
less any expected costs to recover the asset and any expected reduction in value. Impairment charges against the inventory returns asset are  
£nil in 2020 (2019: £nil). The returns asset all relates to finished goods. 

The year on year reduction in inventories is due to increased provisions for obsolescence and a reduction in the production of inventory due to the 
Group’s digital first strategy.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information180

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

22. Trade and other receivables

All figures in £ millions

Current

Trade receivables

Royalty advances

Prepayments 

Investment in finance lease receivable

Accrued income

Other receivables

Non-current

Trade receivables

Royalty advances

Prepayments

Investment in finance lease receivable

Accrued income

Other receivables

2020

2019

795

2

189

18

12

102

1,118

8

3

13

112

1

86

223

903

4

138

25

11

194

1,275

15

–

7

171

5

115

313

Accrued income represents contract assets which are unbilled amounts generally resulting from assessments and services revenue streams 
where revenue to be recognised over time has been recognised in excess of customer billings to date. Impairment charges on accrued income 
assets are £nil (2019: £nil). The carrying value of the Group’s trade and other receivables approximates its fair value. Trade receivables are stated 
net of provisions for bad and doubtful debts. In addition to the above, there are trade receivables of £6m (2019: £nil) classified as held for sale  
(see note 32). 

The movements in the provision for bad and doubtful debts are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

At beginning of year

Exchange differences

Income statement movements

Utilised

Transfer to assets classified as held for sale

At end of year

2020

2019

(92)

6

(26)

32

6

(74)

(96)

3

(35)

36

–

(92)

2019

654

155

35

9

14

51

918

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the Group’s large number of customers, who are  
internationally dispersed.

The ageing of the Group’s trade receivables is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Within due date

Up to three months past due date

Three to six months past due date

Six to nine months past due date

Nine to 12 months past due date

More than 12 months past due date

Net trade receivables

2020

668

70

11

23

7

24

803

The Group reviews its bad debt provision at least twice a year following a detailed review of receivable balances and historical payment profiles, 
and assessment of forward looking risk factors. In 2020, this assessment included factors specifically related to the COVID-19 pandemic which 
resulted in a proportionate increase in the bad debt provision. A significant portion of the trade debtors are covered by insurance contracts. 
Management believes all the remaining receivable balances are fully recoverable.

The year on year reduction in trade and other receivables is primarily driven by reduced sales, a proportionate increase in provisions for bad 
debts, the receipt of deferred proceeds in relation to the US K-12 disposal and the disposal of a lease held as an investment in finance lease 
receivable. This is partially offset by an increase in prepayments due to timing differences on certain significant payments. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information181

23. Provisions for other liabilities and charges

All figures in £ millions

At 1 January 2020

Exchange differences

Charged to income statement

Released to income statement

Utilised

Transfer from trade and other liabilities

At 31 December 2020

Analysis of provisions:

All figures in £ millions

Current

Non-current

Current

Non-current

Property

Disposals  
and closures

Legal  
and other

Total

16

–

1

(2)

(7)

–

8

–

–

4

–

–

–

4

49

(3)

11

(5)

(36)

5

21

Property

Disposals  
and closures

Legal  
and other

2

6

8

9

7

16

4

–

4

–

–

–

19

2

21

43

6

49

65

(3)

16

(7)

(43)

5

33

2020

Total

25

8

33

2019

52

13

65

Property provisions in 2020 relate primarily to dilapidations and in 2019 relate to restructuring and dilapidation provisions. Disposals and closures 
relate to the disposal of Pearson Institute of Higher Education.

Legal and other includes legal claims, contract disputes and potential contract losses with the provisions utilised as the cases are settled.  
Also included in legal and other are other restructuring provisions that are generally utilised within one year. 

The year on year reduction in provisions is mainly due to utilisation of provisions related to the 2017-2019 major restructuring programme. 

24. Trade and other liabilities

All figures in £ millions

Trade payables

Sales return liability

Social security and other taxes

Accruals

Deferred income

Interest payable

Other liabilities

Less: non-current portion

Deferred income

Other liabilities

Current portion

2020

340

86

17

290

356

30

157

2019

358

122

13

295

360

28

188

1,276

1,364

52

28

80

55

31

86

1,196

1,278

The carrying value of the Group’s trade and other liabilities approximates its fair value. The deferred income balance comprises contract liabilities 
in respect of advance payments in assessment, testing and training businesses; subscription income in school and college businesses; and 
obligations to deliver digital content in future periods. 

In addition to the above, there are accruals of £2m (2019: £nil) and deferred income of £3m (2019: £nil) classified as held for sale (see note 32). 

The decrease in the sales return liability is largely due to the reduction in sales of physical products. Other reductions in trade and other liabilities 
are primarily due to favourable foreign exchange movements.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information182

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations

Background

The Group operates a number of defined benefit and defined 
contribution retirement plans throughout the world.

The largest plan is The Pearson Pension Plan (UK Group plan)  
in the UK, which is sectionalised to provide both defined benefit and 
defined contribution pension benefits. The defined benefit section  
was closed to new members from 1 November 2006. The defined 
contribution section, opened in 2003, is open to new and existing 
employees. Finally, there is a separate section within the UK Group  

plan set up for auto-enrolment. The defined benefit section of the  
UK Group plan is a final salary pension plan which provides benefits  
to members in the form of a guaranteed level of pension payable for  
life. The level of benefits depends on the length of service and final 
pensionable pay. The UK Group plan is funded with benefit payments 
from trustee-administered funds. The UK Group plan is administered 
in accordance with the Trust Deed and Rules in the interests of its 
beneficiaries by Pearson Group Pension Trustee Limited. 

At 31 December 2020, the UK Group plan had approximately 26,500 
members, analysed in the following table:

All figures in %

Defined benefit

Defined contribution

Total

The other major defined benefit plans are based in the US. These are 
also final salary pension plans which provide benefits to members in 
the form of a guaranteed pension payable for life, with the level of 
benefits dependent on length of service and final pensionable pay.  
The majority of the US plans are funded.

The Group also has several post-retirement medical benefit plans 
(PRMBs), principally in the US. PRMBs are unfunded but are accounted 
for and valued similarly to defined benefit pension plans. 

In 2020, due to the November court judgement on GMP equalisation, 
there is a past service cost recognised in the income statement in 
respect of the UK Group Plan of £1m.

The defined benefit schemes expose the Group to actuarial risks,  
such as life expectancy, inflation risks and investment risk including 
asset volatility and changes in bond yields. The Group is not exposed  
to any unusual, entity-specific or plan-specific risks.

Active

Deferred

Pensioners

Total

–

12

12

19

36

55

33

–

33

52

48

100

The defined contribution section of the UK Group plan operates a 
Reference Scheme Test (RST) pension underpin for its members. 
Where a member’s fund value is insufficient to purchase the RST 
pension upon retirement, the UK Group plan is liable for the shortfall  
to cover the member’s RST pension. A liability of £67m (2019: £33m)  
is included in the UK Group plan’s defined benefit obligation, 
representing the net cost of the shortfall to cover RST pensions and 
fund values being converted to a pension in the UK Group plan. This is 
calculated as the present value of projected payments less the fund 
value. From 1 January 2018, members who have sufficient funds to 
purchase an RST pension are able to convert their fund value into a 
pension in the UK Group plan as an alternative to purchasing an 
annuity with an insurer. The Group does not recognise the assets  
and liabilities for members of the defined contribution section of the 
UK Group plan whose fund values are expected to be sufficient to 
purchase an RST pension without assistance from the UK Group plan. 
Based on experience, an assumption has been made about the 
proportion of members who will choose to convert their fund value 
into a pension in the UK Group Plan and this has been taken into 
account in the calculation of the UK Group Plan’s defined benefit 
obligation. The defined contribution section of the UK Group plan had 
gross assets of £545m at 31 December 2020 (2019: £512m).

K J Key judgements

  Whether the Group will be eligible to receive the surplus 
associated with the UK Group Pension Plan in recognising a 
pension asset.

K E Key areas of estimation

  The determination of the pension cost and defined benefit 
obligation of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes 
depends on the selection of certain assumptions, which include 
the discount rate, inflation rate, salary growth and longevity. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information183

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations continued

Assumptions

The principal assumptions used for the UK Group plan and the US PRMB are shown below. Weighted average assumptions have been shown for 
the other plans, which primarily relate to US pension plans.

All figures in %

Inflation

Rate used to discount plan liabilities

Expected rate of increase in salaries

Expected rate of increase for pensions in payment and  
deferred pensions

Initial rate of increase in healthcare rate

Ultimate rate of increase in healthcare rate

UK Group 
plan

Other  
plans

2.9

1.4

3.4

2.05 to 5.05

–

–

0.6

2.2

2.2

–

–

–

2020

PRMB

–

2.1

3.0

UK Group 
plan

Other  
plans

3.0

2.0

3.5

–

1.85 to 5.05

6.5

5.0

–

–

2019

PRMB

1.5

3.1

3.0

–

6.8

5.0

1.7

3.0

2.9

–

–

–

The UK discount rate is based on corporate bond yields adjusted to 
reflect the duration of liabilities. 

The inflation rate for the UK Group plan of 2.9% reflects the RPI rate.  
In line with changes to legislation in 2010, certain benefits have been 
calculated with reference to CPI as the inflationary measure and  
in these instances a rate of 2.2% has been used. The CPI rate is 
determined as a weighted average deduction from the RPI rate,  
and allows for the expected change to the formula for calculating  
RPI to be in line with CPIH from 2030 onwards.

The expected rate of increase in salaries has been set at 3.4% for 2020.

For the UK Group plan, the mortality base table assumptions have 
been updated and are derived from the SAPS S2 for males and females, 
adjusted to reflect the observed experience of the plan, with CMI 
model improvement factors. A 1.5% long-term rate improvement on 
the CMI 2019 model is applied for both males and females. The analysis 
of experience, and standard tables, do not reflect the impact of  
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the ultimate impact of which  
remains uncertain.

For the US plans, the mortality table (Pri – 2012) and 2020 improvement 
scale (MP – 2020) with generational projection for male and female 
annuitants has been adopted.

Using the above tables, the remaining average life expectancy in years of a pensioner retiring at age 65 on the balance sheet date for the  
UK Group plan and US plans is as follows:

All figures in years

Male

Female

2020

24.0

24.3

UK

2019

24.0

24.3

2020

20.4

22.4

US

2019

20.6

22.6

The remaining average life expectancy in years of a pensioner retiring at age 65, 20 years after the balance sheet date, for the UK and US Group 
plans is as follows:

All figures in years

Male

Female

2020

25.6

26.1

UK

2019

25.5

26.1

2020

21.9

23.8

US

2019

22.2

24.1

Although the Group anticipates that plan surpluses will be utilised during the life of the plan to address member benefits, the Group recognises its 
pension surplus in full in respect of the UK Group plan on the basis that it is management’s judgement that there are no substantive restrictions 
on the return of residual plan assets in the event of a winding up of the plan after all member obligations have been met.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information184

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations continued

Financial statement information

The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows: 

All figures in £ millions

Current service cost

Past service cost

Curtailments

Administration expenses

Total operating expense

Interest on plan assets

Interest on plan liabilities

Net finance (income)/expense

Net income statement charge

All figures in £ millions

Current service cost

Past service cost

Curtailments

Administration expenses

Total operating expense

Interest on plan assets

Interest on plan liabilities

Net finance (income)/expense

Net income statement charge

UK Group 
plan

Defined  
benefit  
other

Sub-total

Defined 
contribution

PRMB

6

1

–

5

12

(66)

57

(9)

3

2

–

(1)

–

1

(3)

5

2

3

8

1

(1)

5

13

(69)

62

(7)

6

47

–

–

–

47

–

–

–

47

–

–

–

–

–

–

1

1

1

2020

Total

55

1

(1)

5

60

(69)

63

(6)

54

2019

UK Group 
plan

Defined  
benefit  
other

Sub-total

Defined 
contribution

PRMB

Total

6

–

(2)

6

10

(89)

73

(16)

(6)

3

–

–

–

3

(5)

6

1

4

9

–

(2)

6

13

(94)

79

(15)

(2)

57

–

–

–

57

–

–

–

57

–

–

(1)

–

(1)

–

2

2

1

The amounts recognised in the balance sheet are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Fair value of plan assets

Present value of defined  
benefit obligation

Net pension asset/(liability)

Other post-retirement medical  
benefit obligation

Other pension accruals

Net retirement benefit asset

Analysed as:

Retirement benefit assets

Retirement benefit obligations

UK Group 
plan

Other funded  
plans

3,588

119

(3,178)

410

(135)

(16)

Other 
unfunded 
plans

–

(21)

(21)

2020

Total

3,707

UK Group 
plan

Other funded  
plans

3,341

120

(3,334)

373

(2,912)

429

(138)

(18)

Other 
unfunded 
plans

–

(19)

(19)

(39)

(9)

325

410

(85)

The following gains/(losses) have been recognised in other comprehensive income:

All figures in £ millions

Amounts recognised for defined benefit plans

Amounts recognised for post-retirement medical benefit plans

Total recognised in year

2020

(24)

1

(23)

66

–

(3)

6

69

(94)

81

(13)

56

2019

Total

3,461

(3,069)

392

(43)

(12)

337

429

(92)

2019

(148)

3

(145)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information185

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations continued

Financial statement information continued

The fair value of plan assets comprises the following:

All figures in %

Insurance

Equities

Bonds

Property

Pooled asset investment funds

Other

UK Group  
plan

Other  
funded plans

42

1

5

5

33

12

–

1

1

–

–

–

2020

Total

42

2

6

5

33

12

UK Group  
plan

Other  
funded plans

43

1

5

5

30

13

–

1

2

–

–

–

2019

Total

43

2

7

5

30

13

The plan assets do not include any of the Group’s own financial instruments, or any property occupied by the Group. The table below further 
disaggregates the plan assets into additional categories and those assets which have a quoted market price in an active market and those that  
do not:

All figures in %

Insurance

Non-UK equities

Fixed-interest securities

Property

Pooled asset investment funds

Other

Total

The liquidity profile of the UK Group plan assets is as follows:

All figures in %

Liquid – call <1 month

Less liquid – call 1–3 months

Illiquid – call >3 months

2020

2019

Quoted  
market price

No quoted 
market price

Quoted  
market price

No quoted 
market price

42

–

6

–

34

–

82

–

2

–

5

–

11

18

43

–

7

–

30

–

80

–

2

–

5

–

13

20

2020

2019

39

–

61

37

–

63

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information186

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations continued

Financial statement information continued

Changes in the values of plan assets and liabilities of the retirement benefit plans are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Fair value of plan assets

Opening fair value of plan assets

Exchange differences

Interest on plan assets

Return on plan assets excluding interest

Contributions by employer

Benefits paid

Other

Closing fair value of plan assets

Present value of defined benefit obligation

Opening defined benefit obligation

Exchange differences

Current service cost

Past service cost

Curtailments

Administration expenses

Interest on plan liabilities

Actuarial losses – experience

Actuarial gains – demographic

Actuarial losses – financial

Contributions by employee

Other

Benefits paid

Closing defined benefit obligation

UK Group  
plan

Other  
plans

2020

Total

UK Group  
plan

Other  
plans

3,341

–

66

297

3

(119)

–

3,588

120

(3)

3

8

5

(14)

–

119

3,461

3,240

(3)

69

305

8

(133)

–

3,707

–

89

133

3

(124)

–

3,341

141

(5)

5

13

2

(16)

(20)

120

2019

Total

3,381

(5)

94

146

5

(140)

(20)

3,461

(2,912)

(157)

(3,069)

(2,671)

(177)

(2,848)

–

(6)

(1)

–

(5)

(57)

(18)

1

(299)

–

–

119

(3,178)

3

(2)

–

1

–

(5)

(2)

1

(11)

2

–

14

3

(8)

(1)

1

(5)

(62)

(20)

2

(310)

2

–

133

(156)

(3,334)

–

(6)

–

2

(6)

(73)

(6)

18

(294)

–

–

124

(2,912)

5

(3)

–

–

–

(6)

(1)

1

(12)

–

20

16

5

(9)

–

2

(6)

(79)

(7)

19

(306)

–

20

140

(157)

(3,069)

2020

(43)

2019

(49)

1

–

–

(1)

3

1

(3)

3

1

–

1

(2)

4

1

(2)

3

(39)

(43)

The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation is 17 years for the UK and eight years for the US.

Changes in the value of the US PRMB are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Opening defined benefit obligation

Exchange differences

Current service cost

Curtailments

Interest on plan liabilities

Actuarial gains – experience

Actuarial gains – demographic

Actuarial losses – financial

Benefits paid

Closing defined benefit obligation

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information187

25. Retirement benefit and other post-retirement obligations continued

Following the purchase of buy-in policies with Legal & General and 
Aviva in 2017 and 2019, 95% of the UK Group plan’s pensioner liabilities 
are now matched with buy-in policies. These transfer significant 
longevity risk to Aviva and Legal & General, reducing the pension risks 
being underwritten by the Group and providing additional security  
for members.

Regular employer contributions to the UK Group plan in respect of the 
defined benefit sections are estimated to be £2m for 2021.

Funding

The UK Group plan is self-administered with the plan’s assets  
being held independently of the Group in trust. The trustee of the  
UK Group plan is required to act in the best interest of the plan’s 
beneficiaries. The most recent triennial actuarial valuation for funding 
purposes was completed as at 1 January 2018 and this valuation 
revealed a technical provisions funding surplus of £163m. The UK 
Group plan expects to be able to provide benefits (in accordance  
with the plan rules) with a very low level of reliance on future funding 
from the Group. 

Assets of the UK Group plan are divided into two elements: matching 
assets, which are assets that produce cash flows that can be expected 
to match the cash flows for a proportion of the membership, and 
include a liability-driven investment mandate (UK bonds, interest rate/
inflation swaps and other derivative instruments), pensioner buy-in 
insurance policies, inflation-linked property and infrastructure, and 
return seeking assets, which are assets invested with a longer-term 
horizon to generate the returns needed to provide the remaining 
expected cash flows for the beneficiaries, and include diversified 
growth funds, property and alternative asset classes. The UK Group 
plan’s long-term investment strategy allocates 95% to matching assets 
and 5% to return-seeking assets.

Sensitivities

The effect of a one percentage point increase and decrease in the discount rate on the defined benefit obligation and the total pension expense is 
as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Effect:

(Decrease)/increase in defined benefit obligation – UK Group plan

(Decrease)/increase in defined benefit obligation – US plan

The effect of members living one year more or one year less on the defined benefit obligation is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Effect:

Increase/(decrease) in defined benefit obligation – UK Group plan

Increase/(decrease) in defined benefit obligation – US plan

The effect of a half percentage point increase and decrease in the inflation rate is as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Effect:

Increase/(decrease) in defined benefit obligation – UK Group plan

Increase/(decrease) in defined benefit obligation – US plan

2020

1% increase

1% decrease

(522)

(11)

723

13

2020

One year  
increase

One year 
decrease

144

8

(143)

(9)

2020

0.5% increase 0.5% decrease

191

–

(173)

–

The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant, although in practice this is 
unlikely to occur and changes in some assumptions may be correlated. When calculating these sensitivities, the same method has been applied to 
calculate the defined benefit obligation as has been applied when calculating the liability recognised in the balance sheet. This methodology is the 
same as prior periods.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information188

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

26. Share-based payments
The Group recognised the following charges in the income statement in respect of its equity-settled share-based payment plans:

All figures in £ millions

Pearson plans

The Group operates the following equity-settled employee option and 
share plans:

Worldwide Save for Shares Plan – Since 1994, the Group has operated  
a Save-As-You-Earn plan for UK employees. In 1998, the Group 
introduced a Worldwide Save for Shares Plan. Under these plans, 
employees can save a portion of their monthly salary over periods of 
three or five years. At the end of this period, the employee has the 
option to purchase ordinary shares with the accumulated funds at a 
purchase price equal to 80% of the market price prevailing at the time 
of the commencement of the employee’s participation in the plan. 
Options that are not exercised within six months of the end of the 
savings period lapse unconditionally.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan – In 2000, the Group established an 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan which allows all employees in the US to 
save a portion of their monthly salary over six-month periods. At the 
end of the period, the employee has the option to purchase American 
Depositary Receipts (ADRs) with their accumulated funds at a purchase 
price equal to 85% of the lower of the market prices prevailing at the 
beginning or end of the period.

The following shares were granted under restricted share arrangements:

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Management Incentive Plan

2020

29

2019

25

Long-Term Incentive Plan – The plan was first introduced in 2001, 
renewed again in 2006 and again in 2011. The plan consists of restricted 
shares. The vesting of restricted shares is normally dependent on 
continuing service over a three to five-year period, and in the case of 
Executive Directors and senior management upon the satisfaction of 
corporate performance targets over a three-year period. These targets 
may be based on market and/or non-market performance criteria. 
Restricted shares awarded to Executive Directors in May 2020 and  
May 2019 vest dependent on relative total shareholder return,  
return on invested capital and adjusted earnings per share growth. 
These awards are in addition to the one-off co-investment award  
for the Chief Executive, vesting in three equal tranches based on 
market and non-market performance criteria. The applicable market 
condition for the vesting of the final tranche is on total shareholder 
return. Further details of the award are outlined in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report. Other restricted shares awarded in 2020  
and 2019 vest depending on continuing service over periods of up to 
three years. 

Management Incentive Plan – The plan was introduced in 2017 
combining the Group’s Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive 
Plan for senior management. The number of shares to be granted to 
participants is dependent on Group performance in the calendar year 
preceding the date of grant (on the same basis as the Annual Incentive 
Plan). Subsequently, the shares vest dependent on continuing service 
over a three-year period, and additionally, in the case of the Pearson 
Executive Management team, upon satisfaction of non-market based 
performance criteria as determined by the Remuneration Committee. 
Restricted shares awarded as part of the 2019 Management Incentive 
Plan were granted in April 2020. Restricted shares awarded as part of 
the 2020 Management Incentive Plan will be granted in April 2021.

2020

2019

Number of 
shares  
000s

Weighted average  
fair value
£

Number of 
shares  
000s

Weighted average  
fair value
£

5,598

696

4.94

5.29

2,785

1,435

8.09

8.49

The fair value of shares granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Management Incentive Plan that vest unconditionally is  
determined using the share price at the date of grant. The number of shares expected to vest is adjusted, based on historical experience,  
to account for potential forfeitures. Participants under the plans are entitled to dividends during the vesting period and therefore the share  
price is not discounted.

Restricted shares with a market performance condition were valued by an independent actuary using a Monte Carlo model. Restricted  
shares with a non-market performance condition were fair valued based on the share price at the date of grant. Non-market performance  
conditions are taken into consideration by adjusting the number of shares expected to vest based on the most likely outcome of the relevant 
performance criteria.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information189

27. Share capital and share premium

At 1 January 2019

Issue of ordinary shares – share option schemes

Purchase of own shares

At 31 December 2019

Issue of ordinary shares – share option schemes

Purchase of own shares

At 31 December 2020

Number of 
shares 
000s

781,078

1,021

–

782,099

1,236

(30,077)

753,258

Share 
capital 
£m

195

Share  
premium 
£m

2,607

–

–

195

–

(7)

188

7

–

2,614

6

–

2,620

The ordinary shares have a par value of 25p per share (2019: 25p per share). All issued shares are fully paid. All shares have the same rights.

A £350m share buyback programme was announced January 2020, the programme was later paused due to the impact of COVID-19. The original 
intention was to buyback approximately £350m of shares and at the date of pausing the programme approximately 30m shares had been bought 
back and cancelled at a cost of £176m. There are currently no plans to resume the share buyback programme. The shares bought back have  
been cancelled and the nominal value of these shares transferred to a capital redemption reserve. The nominal value of shares cancelled at  
31 December 2020 was £18m (2019: £11m).

The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising the return  
to shareholders through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance.

The capital structure of the Group consists of debt (see note 18), cash and cash equivalents (see note 17) and equity attributable to equity holders 
of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained earnings.

The Group reviews its capital structure on a regular basis and will balance its overall capital structure through payments of dividends,  
new share issues as well as the issue of new debt or the redemption of existing debt in line with the financial risk policies outlined in note 19.

28. Treasury shares

At 1 January 2019

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

At 31 December 2019

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

At 31 December 2020

Number of 
shares 
000s

3,225

6,100

(6,067)

3,258

1,105

(3,460)

903

£m

33

52

(61)

24

6

(23)

7

The Group holds Pearson plc shares in trust to satisfy its obligations under its restricted share plans (see note 26). These shares, representing 0.1% 
(2019: 0.4%) of called-up share capital, are treated as treasury shares for accounting purposes and have a par value of 25p per share. 

The nominal value of Pearson plc treasury shares amounts to £0.2m (2019: £0.8m). Dividends on treasury shares are waived. 

At 31 December 2020, the market value of Pearson plc treasury shares was £6m (2019: £21m).

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information190

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

29. Other comprehensive income

All figures in £ millions

Items that may be reclassified to the income statement

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign operations – Group

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign  
operations – associates

Currency translation adjustment disposed 

Attributable tax

Items that are not reclassified to the income statement

Fair value gain on other financial assets

Attributable tax

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – Group

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – associates

Attributable tax

Attributable to equity holders of the company

Fair value 
reserve

Translation 
reserve

Retained 
earnings

–

–

–

–

14

–

–

–

–

(109)

–

(70)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(13)

–

(6)

(23)

–

2

Total

(109)

–

(70)

(13)

14

(6)

(23)

–

2

Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year

14

(179)

(40)

(205)

Attributable to equity holders of the company

All figures in £ millions

Items that may be reclassified to the income statement

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign operations – Group

Net exchange differences on translation of foreign  
operations – associates

Currency translation adjustment disposed 

Attributable tax

Items that are not reclassified to the income statement

Fair value gain on other financial assets

Attributable tax

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – Group

Remeasurement of retirement benefit obligations – associates

Attributable tax

Fair value 
reserve

Translation 
reserve

Retained 
earnings

–

–

–

–

20

–

–

–

–

(113)

(2)

4

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

5

–

(4)

(145)

(4)

22

(126)

Total

(113)

(2)

4

5

20

(4)

(145)

(4)

22

(217)

Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year

20

(111)

Non- 
controlling 
interest

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Non- 
controlling 
interest

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2020

Total

(109)

–

(70)

(13)

14

(6)

(23)

–

2

(205)

2019

Total

(113)

(2)

4

5

20

(4)

(145)

(4)

22

(217)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information191

30. Business combinations
There were no significant acquisitions in 2020. In 2019, the Group made some small acquisitions for total consideration of £40m. Details of the 
assets acquired and the associated consideration are shown in the table below. 

all figures in £ millions

Intangible assets

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other liabilities

Net assets acquired

Goodwill

Total

Satisfied by:

Cash

Total consideration

2020

2019

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

23

1

(2)

22

18

40

40

40

There were no material adjustments to prior year acquisitions in 2019. The net cash outflow on acquisition of subsidiaries in 2020 relates to 
deferred payments for prior year acquisitions. 

All figures in £ millions

Cash flow on acquisitions

Cash – current year acquisitions

Deferred payments for prior year acquisitions and other items

Net cash outflow

2020

2019

–

(6)

(6)

(40)

(5)

(45)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information192

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

31. Disposals
In April 2020, the Group completed the sale of the remaining 25% interest in Penguin Random House resulting in a pre-tax profit of £180m.  
There were no other disposals in 2020 and additional gains of £4m relate to adjustments to prior year disposal costs. In 2019, the only material 
disposal was the sale of the US K-12 business in March 2019. Deferred proceeds relating to the K-12 sale were received in 2020 (see note 14 for 
further details). 

All figures in £ millions

Disposal of subsidiaries and associates

Intangible assets

Investments in joint ventures and associates

Intangible assets – pre-publication

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts)

Net deferred income tax assets

Trade and other liabilities

Cumulative currency translation adjustment

Net assets disposed

Cash received

Deferred proceeds

Costs of disposal

Gain on disposal

All figures in £ millions

Cash flow from disposals

Proceeds – current year disposals

Proceeds – prior year disposals

Cash and cash equivalents disposed

Costs and other disposal liabilities paid

Net cash inflow/(outflow)

Analysed as:

Cash inflow/(outflow) from sale of subsidiaries

Cash inflow from disposal of joint ventures and associates

Notes

29

2020

Total

–

(418)

–

–

–

–

–

–

70

(348)

531

–

1

184

2019

Total

(101)

–

(238)

(64)

(70)

(104)

(100)

520

(4)

(161)

20

180

(23)

16

2020

2019

531

105

–

(5)

631

100

531

20

–

(104)

(17)

(101)

(101)

–

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information193

32. Held for sale
The held for sale assets and liabilities in 2020 are the Group’s interests in Pearson Institute of Higher Education (PIHE) in South Africa following 
announcement of the sale in November 2020. The sale of PIHE was completed on 5 February 2021 (see note 37). A charge of £8m has been 
recognised in other net gains and losses in relation to the disposal of PIHE. The charge reduces the carrying value of the assets and liabilities  
held for sale to their fair value based on expected disposal proceeds net of costs to sell. Held for sale assets in 2019 relate to the 25% holding in 
Penguin Random House prior to its disposal in April 2020. The held for sale balances are analysed as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

Investments in joint ventures and associates

Current assets

Trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Assets classified as held for sale

Non-current liabilities

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Current liabilities

Trade and other liabilities

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Liabilities classified as held for sale

Net (liabilities)/assets classified as held for sale

2020

Total

48

–

48

6

19

25

73

(66)

(66)

(5)

(3)

(8)

(74)

(1)

2019

Total

–

397

397

–

–

–

397

–

–

–

–

–

397

Goodwill is allocated to the held for sale businesses on a relative fair value basis where these businesses form part of a larger cash generating  
unit (CGU).

The Group has historically presented the results of Penguin Random House separately within segment information (see note 2) to provide further 
information about the composition of the Group outside of the primary segments. The Group has not viewed Penguin Random House as 
comprising a separate major line of business since the sale of 22% of the Group’s stake in Penguin Random House to Bertelsmann in 2017.  
On this basis, the Group did not classify Penguin Random House as a discontinued operation.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information194

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

33. Cash generated from operations

All figures in £ millions

Profit

Adjustments for:

Income tax

Depreciation

Amortisation and impairment of acquired intangibles and goodwill

Amortisation of software

Net finance costs

Share of results of joint ventures and associates

Profit on disposal of subsidiaries, associates, investments and fixed assets

Other net gains and losses

Net profit on disposal of right-of-use assets including transfers to investment in finance lease receivable

Net foreign exchange adjustment from transactions

Investment income

Share-based payment costs

Pre-publication

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other liabilities

Retirement benefit obligations

Provisions for other liabilities and charges

Net cash generated from operations

Dividends from joint ventures and associates

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

Addition of new right-of-use lease assets

Purchase of intangible assets

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

Net disposal of right-of-use lease assets including transfers to/from investment in finance lease receivable

Investment income

Net costs paid for major restructuring 

Operating cash flow

Operating tax paid

Net operating finance costs paid

Operating free cash flow

Non-operating tax received/(paid)

Net costs paid for major restructuring

Free cash flow

Dividends paid (including to non-controlling interests)

Net movement of funds from operations

Acquisitions and disposals

Loans repaid/(advanced) 

New equity

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Other movements on financial instruments

Net movement of funds

Exchange movements on net debt

Movement in net debt

Opening net debt

Adjustment on initial application of IFRS 16

Closing net debt

Notes

10

11

11

6

12

26

2020

310

44

125

80

112

57

(5)

(182)

6

(6)

(34)

–

29

(56)

35

(1)

(26)

(1)

(37)

450

4

(53)

(61)

(81)

–

18

–

38

315

(10)

(50)

255

12

(38)

229

(147)

82

619

48

6

(176)

(6)

(29)

544

9

553

(1,016)

–

(463)

2019

266

(34)

123

151

115

43

(54)

(9)

–

(4)

(21)

(2)

25

(55)

(20)

59

(157)

5

49

480

64

(55)

(64)

(138)

1

17

2

111

418

(9)

(64)

345

(21)

(111)

213

(148)

65

(193)

(49)

7

–

(52)

(9)

(231)

24

(207)

(143)

(666)

(1,016)

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information195

33. Cash generated from operations continued
Net cash generated from operations is translated at an exchange rate approximating the rate at the date of cash flow. The difference between  
this rate and the average rate used to translate profit gives rise to a currency adjustment in the reconciliation between net profit and net  
cash generated from operations. This adjustment reflects the timing difference between recognition of profit and the related cash receipts  
or payments.

Operating cash flow, operating free cash flow and total free cash flow are non-GAAP (non-statutory) measures and have been disclosed and 
reconciled in the above table as they are commonly used by investors to measure the cash performance of the Group. In the cash flow statement, 
proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment comprise:

All figures in £ millions

Net book amount

Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

The movements in the Group’s current and non-current borrowings are as follows:

2020

2019

2

(2)

–

3

(2)

1

All figures in £ millions

Financial liabilities

Non-current borrowings

Current borrowings

Total

New leases/
disposal of 
leases

Transfer from 
non-current 
to current

Financing 
cash flows

Foreign 
exchange 
movements

Fair value  
and other 
movements

30

(6)

24

(260)

260

–

116

(92)

24

(22)

5

(17)

27

2

29

2019

1,567

79

1,646

2020

1,458

248

1,706

Non-current borrowings include bonds, derivative financial instruments and leases. Current borrowings include loans repayable within one year, 
derivative financial instruments and leases, but exclude overdrafts classified within cash and cash equivalents.

34. Contingencies and commitments

K J Key judgements

  The application of tax legislation in relation to provisions for 
uncertain tax positions.

K E Key areas of estimation

  The level of provisions required in relation to uncertain tax positions 
is complex and each matter is separately assessed. The estimation 
of future settlement amounts is based on a number of factors 
including the status of the unresolved matter, clarity of legislation, 
range of possible outcomes and the statute of limitations. 

There are contingent Group liabilities that arise in the normal course  
of business in respect of indemnities, warranties and guarantees in 
relation to former subsidiaries and in respect of guarantees in relation 
to subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. In addition, there are 
contingent liabilities of the Group in respect of unsettled or disputed 
tax liabilities, legal claims, contract disputes, royalties, copyright fees, 
permissions and other rights. None of these claims are expected to 
result in a material gain or loss to the Group. 

On 25 April 2019, the European Commission published the full decision 
that the United Kingdom controlled foreign company group financing 
partial exemption (FCPE) partially constitutes State Aid. The Group  
has lodged an appeal. The Group has benefited from the FCPE in 2018 
and prior years by approximately £116m (which does not include 
additional interest that would be due if this amount had to be repaid). 
Post year end Pearson received Charging Notices requiring a payment 
on account of materially all of the alleged State Aid to be made. The 
Group continues to be of the view that no provision is required in 
respect of this issue. 

The Group is under assessment from the tax authorities in Brazil 
challenging the deduction for tax purposes of goodwill amortisation 
for the years 2012 to 2017. Similar assessments may be raised for other 
years. Potential total exposure (including possible interest and 
penalties) could be up to BRL 754m (£106m) up to 31 December 2020, 
with additional potential exposure of BRL 142m (£20m) in relation to 
deductions expected to be taken in future periods. Such assessments 
are common in Brazil. The Group believes that the likelihood that  
the tax authorities will ultimately prevail is low and that the  
Group’s position is strong. At present, the Group believes no  
provision is required.

Pearson is one of several defendants named in 14 US lawsuits and  
one Canadian antitrust lawsuit related to the Group’s Inclusive Access 
programmes. These lawsuits, purporting to be class actions, have been 
brought on behalf of students and off campus retailers alleging, among 
other things, that Pearson’s Inclusive Access programmes violate US 
and Canadian antitrust laws and state or provincial laws by reducing 
competition from the secondary market and off campus retailers. 
Motions to dismiss have been filed by all defendants in the US lawsuits 
and a ruling is expected later in 2021. At present, the Group believes no 
provision is required in relation to these matters.

At the balance sheet date there were no commitments for capital 
expenditure contracted for but not yet incurred. Commitments in 
respect of leases are shown in note 35.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information196

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

35. Leases
The Group’s lease portfolio consists of approximately 740 property leases, mainly offices and test centres, together with a number of vehicle and 
equipment leases. The Group adopted IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ at 1 January 2019 and applied the modified retrospective approach. The Group has elected 
not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less and leases of low value 
assets. The Group recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

As a lessee:

The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Interest on lease liabilities

Expenses relating to short-term leases

Depreciation of right-of-use assets

Note

2020

2019

(41)

(1)

(68)

(45)

(2)

(64)

10

Lease liabilities are included within financial liabilities – borrowings in the balance sheet, see note 18. The maturities of the Group’s lease liabilities 
are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Less than one year

One to five years

More than five years

Total undiscounted lease liabilities

Lease liabilities included in the balance sheet

Analysed as:

Current

Non-current

2020

100

333

441

874

683

73

610

2019

123

420

622

1,165

838

89

749

In addition to the above, there are current lease liabilities of £3m (2019: £nil) and non-current lease liabilities of £66m classified as held for sale  
(see note 32).

The amounts recognised in the cash flow statement are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Total cash outflow for leases as a lessee

2020

133

2019

136

At the balance sheet date commitments for capital leases contracted for but not yet incurred were £3m. Extension and termination options and 
variable lease payments are not significant within the lease portfolio. Short-term leases to which the Group is committed at the balance sheet date 
are similar to the portfolio of short-term leases to which the short-term lease expense is disclosed above.

As a lessor:

In the event that the Group has excess capacity in its leased offices and warehouses, the Group sub-leases some of its properties under operating 
and finance leases.

The amounts recognised in the income statement are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Interest on lease receivables

Income from sub-leasing right-of-use assets (within other income)

The amounts recognised in the cash flow statement are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Total cash inflow for leases as a lessor

2020

2019

9

7

11

17

2020

50

2019

37

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information197

35. Leases continued
The following table sets out the maturity analysis of lease payments receivable for sub-leases classified as operating leases, showing the 
undiscounted lease payments to be received after the reporting date, and sub-leases classified as finance leases showing the undiscounted lease 
payments to be received after the reporting date and the net investment in the finance lease receivable. During the year the investment in finance 
lease receivable decreased by £66m (2019: decreased £19m) due to payments received and the disposal of a lease. 

All figures in £ millions

Less than one year

One to two years

Two to three years

Three to four years

Four to five years

More than five years

Total undiscounted lease payments receivable

Unearned finance income

Net investment in finance lease receivable

36. Related party transactions 

Joint ventures and associates

Operating 
leases

Finance  
leases

2020 Total

2019 Total

1

–

–

–

–

3

4

23

24

18

18

18

53

154

(24)

130

24

24

18

18

18

56

46

44

37

33

34

87

158

281

In 2020, the Group disposed of its interests in Penguin Random House and therefore Penguin Random House is no longer a related party.  
Prior to the completion of the sale of Penguin Random House, the Group received dividends of £1m (2019: £64m) from Penguin Random House. 
Loans to Penguin Random House of £49m which were outstanding at 31 December 2019 were repaid at the point of disposal.

Key management personnel

Key management personnel are deemed to be the members of the Pearson Executive Management team (see p72). It is this Committee which  
had responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group in 2020. Key management personnel compensation is 
disclosed below:

All figures in £millions

Short-term employee benefits

Retirement benefits

Share-based payment costs

Total

2020

2019

6

1

6

13

5

1

4

10

There were no other material related party transactions. No guarantees have been provided to related parties.

37. Events after the balance sheet date
On 5 February 2021, the Group completed the sale of its interests in Pearson Institute of Higher Education in South Africa. Consideration received 
was nominal. 

In February 2021, the Group received charging notices requiring payment of materially all of the alleged State Aid (see note 34 for further details). 
A payment of £100m was made on 8 March 2021. The Group expects to recover the funds in due course.

In February 2021, the Group renegotiated its revolving credit facility, extending the maturity of $1bn of the facility by one year to 2025. 

On 5 March 2021, the Group agreed the disposal of its K-12 Sistemas – COC and Dom Bosco – in Brazil, subject to securing regulatory approval  
and closing. 

On 8 March 2021, the Group announced a new strategy including a new divisional structure. Going forward the new structure will impact 
segmental reporting and may impact the Group’s cash generating units. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information198

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

38. Accounts and audit exemptions
The Pearson plc subsidiary companies listed below are exempt from the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 relating to the audit of 
individual accounts by virtue of section 479A.

Company number

Company number

Aldwych Finance Limited 

Edexcel Limited

04720439

Pearson Loan Finance No. 4 Limited

04496750

Pearson Loan Finance No. 5 Limited

Education Development International plc

03914767

Pearson Loan Finance No. 6 Limited

Longman Group (Overseas Holdings) Limited

00690236

Pearson Loan Finance Unlimited

Major123 Limited

05333023

Pearson Management Services Limited

Pearson Australia Finance Unlimited

05578463

Pearson Overseas Holdings Limited

Pearson Books Limited

Pearson Brazil Finance Limited

02512075

Pearson Pension Trustee Services Limited

08848874

Pearson Strand Limited

Pearson Canada Finance Unlimited

05578491

Pearson Real Estate Holdings Limited

Pearson Dollar Finance plc

05111013

Pearson Services Limited

Pearson Dollar Finance Two Limited

06507766

Pearson Shared Services Limited

Pearson Education Holdings Limited 

00210859

Pearson Strand Finance Limited

Pearson Education Investments Limited

08444933

PVNT Limited

Pearson Education Limited

Pearson Funding Four Limited

00872828

TQ Catalis Limited

07970304

TQ Clapham Limited

Pearson International Finance Limited

02496206

TQ Global Limited

Pearson Loan Finance No. 3 Limited

05052661

02635107

12017252

12030662

05144467

00096263

00145205

10803853

08561316

09768242

01341060

04623186

11091691

08038068

07307943

07307925

07802458

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information199

Company balance sheet

As at 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Assets

Non-current assets

Investments in subsidiaries

Amounts due from subsidiaries

Deferred income tax assets

Financial assets – derivative financial instruments

Current assets

Amounts due from subsidiaries

Amounts due from related parties

Current income tax assets

Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts)

Financial assets – derivative financial instruments

Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Amounts due to subsidiaries

Financial liabilities – borrowings

Financial liabilities – derivative financial instruments

Current liabilities

Amounts due to subsidiaries

Other liabilities

Financial liabilities – derivative financial instruments

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Share capital

Share premium

Treasury shares

Capital redemption reserve

Special reserve

Retained earnings – including loss for the year of £95m (2019: profit of £764m)

Total equity attributable to equity holders of the company

Notes

2020

2019

2

6

11

4

6

5

6

6

7

7

8

6,619

2,164

11

45

6,664

2,122

21

29

8,839

8,836

676

–

18

541

18

3

1,256

10,095

827

48

2

18

25

2

922

9,758

(4,104)

(2,740)

–

(40)

(230)

(24)

(4,144)

(2,994)

(1,382)

(1,800)

(1)

(12)

(1,395)

(5,539)

4,556

188

2,620

(7)

18

447

1,290

4,556

(5)

(15)

(1,820)

(4,814)

4,944

195

2,614

21

11

447

1,656

4,944

These financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 15 March 2021 and signed on its behalf by

Sally Johnson 
Chief Financial Officer 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information200

Company statement of changes in equity

Year ended 31 December 2020

Equity attributable to equity holders of the company

All figures in £ millions

At 1 January 2020

Loss for the year

Equity-settled transactions1

Issue of ordinary shares under share option schemes1

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

Transfer of contributions from subsidiaries 

Capital reduction

Dividends

At 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

At 1 January 2019

Profit for the year

Equity-settled transactions1

Issue of ordinary shares under share option schemes1

Buyback of equity

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

Capital reduction

Dividends

At 31 December 2019

Share  
capital

Share  
premium

Treasury 
shares

195

2,614

–

–

–

(7)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

6

–

–

–

–

–

–

188

2,620

21

–

–

–

–

(6)

23

(45)

–

–

(7)

Capital 
redemption 
reserve

Special  
reserve

Retained 
earnings

11

447

1,656

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

18

447

(95)

29

–

(176)

–

(23)

45

–

(146)

1,290

(146)

4,556

Share  
capital

Share  
premium

Treasury 
shares

Capital 
redemption 
reserve

Special  
reserve

Retained 
earnings

Equity attributable to equity holders of the company

195

2,607

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

–

–

195

2,614

12

–

–

–

–

(52)

61

–

–

21

11

447

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,185

764

25

–

–

–

(61)

(110)

(147)

11

447

1,656

4,944

Total

4,944

(95)

29

6

(176)

(6)

–

–

–

Total

4,457

764

25

7

–

(52)

–

(110)

(147)

The capital redemption reserve reflects the nominal value of shares cancelled in the Group’s share buyback programme. The special reserve 
represents the cumulative effect of cancellation of the company’s share premium account.

1  Full details of the share-based payment plans are disclosed in note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information201

Company cash flow statement

Year ended 31 December 2020

All figures in £ millions

Cash flows from operating activities

Net (loss)/profit

Adjustments for:

Income tax

Net finance costs

Share-based payment costs

Amounts due from/(to) subsidiaries

Net cash generated from operations

Interest paid

Tax received

Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Loans repaid by/(advanced to) related parties

Net cash generated from/(used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares

Buyback of equity

Repayment of borrowings

Proceeds from borrowings

Dividends paid to company’s shareholders

Net cash (used in)/generated from financing activities

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Notes

2020

2019

(95)

764

(20)

95

29

1,061

1,070

(56)

15

1,029

48

48

6

(182)

(230)

–

(146)

(552)

(2)

523

18

541

–

29

25

(818)

–

(26)

7

(19)

(49)

(49)

7

(52)

–

230

(147)

38

9

(21)

39

18

7

4

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information202

Notes to the company financial statements

1. Accounting policies
The financial statements on pp199-209 comprise the separate financial 
statements of Pearson plc.

As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, only the 
consolidated income statement and statement of comprehensive 
income have been presented.

The company has no employees (2019: nil).

The basis of preparation and accounting policies applied in the 
preparation of these company financial statements are the same  
as those set out in note 1a to the consolidated financial statements 
with the addition of the following:

Investments

Lending to/from subsidiaries is considered to be an operating activity 
and any movements are classified as cash flows from operating 
activities in the cash flow statement.

Amounts owed by subsidiaries

Amounts owed by subsidiaries generally mature within five years,  
but can be called upon on short notice, or are repayable on demand. 
Amounts owed by subsidiaries are classified as current if they mature 
within one year of the balance sheet date or if the company intends  
to call the loan within one year of the balance sheet date. All other 
amounts are classified as non-current. The company has assessed and 
concluded that these loans will be fully recovered. Therefore credit 
losses are considered to be immaterial.

Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less provision for 
impairment, with the exception of certain hedged investments that are 
held in a foreign currency and revalued at each balance sheet date.

New accounting standards

No new standards were adopted in 2020. 

A number of other new pronouncements are effective from 1 January 
2020 but they do not have a material impact on the company financial 
statements. 

2. Investments in subsidiaries

All figures in £ millions

At beginning of year

Currency revaluations

At end of year

There were no impairments in 2020 or 2019.

2020

6,664

(45)

6,619

2019

6,710

(46)

6,664

The recoverability of investments is tested annually for impairment in accordance with IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’. The carrying value is 
compared to the asset’s recoverable amount which is generally assessed on a value in use basis. Significant estimation is required to determine 
the recoverable amount. The value in use of the assets is calculated using a discounted cash flow methodology using financial information related 
to the subsidiaries including cash flow projections in conjunction with the goodwill impairment analysis performed by the Group. The key 
assumptions used in the cash flow projections are discount rates, perpetuity growth rates, forecast sales growth rates and forecast operating 
profits. See note 11 of the consolidated financial statements for further details. 

3. Financial risk management
The company’s financial instruments comprise amounts due to/from 
subsidiary undertakings, cash and cash equivalents, derivative 
financial instruments and current borrowings. Derivative financial 
instruments are held at fair value, with all other financial instruments 
held at amortised cost, which approximates fair value. The company’s 
approach to the management of financial risks is consistent with the 
Group’s treasury policy, as discussed in note 19 to the consolidated 
financial statements. The company believes the value of its financial 
assets to be fully recoverable.

The carrying value of the company’s financial instruments is exposed 
to movements in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates 
(primarily US dollars). The company estimates that a 1% increase in 
interest rates would result in a £17m increase in the carrying value of its 
financial instruments, with a 1% decrease in interest rates resulting in a 
£19m decrease in their carrying value. The company also estimates 
that a 10% strengthening in sterling would decrease the carrying value 
of its financial instruments by £123m, while a 10% weakening in the 
value of sterling would increase the carrying value by £146m. These 
increases and decreases in carrying value would be recorded through 
the income statement. Sensitivities are calculated using estimation 
techniques such as discounted cash flow and option valuation models. 
Where modelling an interest rate decrease of 1% led to negative 
interest rates, these points on the yield curve were adjusted to 0%.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information203

3. Financial risk management continued
The following table analyses the company’s derivative assets and liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the 
balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows (including 
interest) and as such may differ from the amounts disclosed on the balance sheet. 

All figures in £ millions

At 31 December 2020

Rate derivatives – inflows

Rate derivatives – outflows

FX forwards – inflows

FX forwards – outflows

Total

At 31 December 2019

Rate derivatives – inflows

Rate derivatives – outflows

FX forwards – inflows

FX forwards – outflows

Total

Analysed by maturity

Analysed by currency

Greater than
one month
and less than
one year

Later than 
one year but 
less than five 
years

Five years or 
more

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Total

(186)

180

(68)

68

(6)

(19)

23

(186)

186

4

(350)

350

–

–

–

(223)

237

(24)

23

13

(1)

12

–

–

11

(332)

331

–

–

(1)

(537)

542

(68)

68

5

(574)

591

(210)

209

16

(12)

209

–

36

233

(41)

242

–

209

410

(152)

330

(68)

–

110

(172)

344

(210)

–

(38)

(373)

3

–

32

(338)

(361)

5

–

–

(356)

(537)

542

(68)

68

5

(574)

591

(210)

209

16

All cash flow projections shown above are on an undiscounted basis. 
Any cash flows based on a floating rate are calculated using interest 
rates as set at the date of the last rate reset. Where this is not possible, 
floating rates are based on interest rates prevailing at 31 December in 
the relevant year. All derivative amounts are shown gross, although  
the company net settles these amounts wherever possible.

between the hedge and the hedged item in the hedge relationship.  
The hedge ratio is 100%. Hedge ineffectiveness would arise if the value 
of the hedged items fell below the value of the hedging instruments 
however this is unlikely as the value of the company’s investments 
denominated in USD are significantly greater than the proposed fair 
value hedge programme.

Fair value hedge accounting

A foreign currency exposure arises from foreign exchange fluctuations 
on translation of the company’s investments in subsidiaries 
denominated in USD into GBP. The hedged risk is the risk of changes  
in the GBPUSD spot rate that will result in changes in the value of  
the USD investments when translated into GBP. The hedged items  
are a portion of the company’s equity investment in subsidiaries 
denominated in USD. The hedging instruments are a portion of the 
company’s intercompany loans due from subsidiaries which are 
denominated in USD. 

It is expected that the change in value of each of these items will  
mirror each other as there is a clear and direct economic relationship 

The value of the hedged items and the hedging instruments are  
£1.3bn (2019: £1.3bn) and the change in value during the year which 
was used to assess hedge ineffectiveness was £45m (2019: £46m). 
There was no hedge ineffectiveness. 

Credit risk management

The company’s main exposure to credit risk relates to lending to 
subsidiaries. Amounts due from subsidiaries are stated net of 
provisions for bad and doubtful debts. The credit risk of each 
subsidiary is influenced by the industry and country in which  
they operate, however, the company considers the credit risk of 
subsidiaries to be low as it has visibility of, and the ability to influence, 
their cash flows. 

4. Cash and cash equivalents (excluding overdrafts)

All figures in £ millions

Cash at bank and in hand

2020

541

541

2019

18

18

At the end of 2020 the currency split of cash and cash equivalents was US dollar 21% (2019: 2%), sterling 76% (2019: 59%) and other 3% (2019: 39%).

Cash and cash equivalents have fair values that approximate their carrying amounts due to their short-term nature. Cash and cash equivalents 
include the following for the purpose of the cash flow statement:

All figures in £ millions

Cash and cash equivalents

Bank overdrafts

2020

541

–

541

2019

18

–

18

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information204

Notes to the company financial statements

5. Financial liabilities – borrowings

All figures in £ millions

Non-current

Revolving credit facility

Total borrowings

2020

2019

–

–

–

230

230

230

Current borrowings are classified within cash and cash equivalents and do not give rise to financing cash flows. The carrying amounts of the 
company’s borrowings is equal to, or approximately equal to, the market value. 

6. Derivative financial instruments
The company’s outstanding derivative financial instruments are as follows:

All figures in £ millions

Interest rate derivatives 

Cross-currency rate derivatives

FX derivatives

Total

Analysed as expiring:

In less than one year

Later than one year and not later than five years

Later than five years

Total

Gross notional 
amounts

Assets

Liabilities

Gross notional 
amounts

Assets

Liabilities

2020

2019

904

516

554

1,974

1,238

663

73

1,974

12

44

7

63

18

45

–

63

(27)

(20)

(5)

(52)

(12)

(32)

(8)

(52)

893

502

941

2,336

1,167

694

475

2,336

15

29

10

54

25

13

16

54

(6)

(31)

(2)

(39)

(15)

(6)

(18)

(39)

The carrying value of the above derivative financial instruments equals their fair value. Derivatives are categorised as level 2 on the fair value 
hierarchy. Fair values are determined by using market data and the use of established estimation techniques such as discounted cash flow and 
option valuation models.

7. Share capital and share premium

At 1 January 2019

Issue of ordinary shares – share option schemes

Purchase of own shares

At 31 December 2019

Issue of ordinary shares – share option schemes

Purchase of own shares

At 31 December 2020

Number of 
shares  
000s

781,078

1,021

–

782,099

1,236

(30,077)

753,258

Share 
capital
£m

195

Share  
premium 
£m

2,607

–

–

195

–

(7)

7

–

2,614

6

–

188

2,620

The ordinary shares have a par value of 25p per share (2019: 25p per share). All issued shares are fully paid. All shares have the same rights. 

A £350m share buyback programme was announced January 2020, the programme was later paused due to the impact of COVID-19. The original 
intention was to buyback approximately £350m of shares and at the date of pausing the programme approximately 30m shares had been bought 
back and cancelled at a cost of £176m. There are currently no plans to resume the share buyback programme. The shares bought back have  
been cancelled and the nominal value of these shares transferred to a capital redemption reserve. The nominal value of shares cancelled at  
31 December 2020 was £18m (2019: £11m).

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information205

8. Treasury shares

At 1 January 2019

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

At 31 December 2019

Purchase of treasury shares

Release of treasury shares

Transfer of contributions from subsidiaries 

At 31 December 2020

Number of 
shares  
000s

3,225

6,100

(6,067)

3,258

1,105

(3,460)

–

903

£m

(12)

52

(61)

(21)

6

(23)

45

7

The company holds its own shares in trust to satisfy its obligations under its restricted share plans. These shares are treated as treasury shares  
for accounting purposes and have a par value of 25p per share. 

The nominal value of the company’s treasury shares amounts to £0.2m (2019: £0.8m). Dividends on treasury shares are waived.

At 31 December 2020, the market value of the company’s treasury shares was £6m (2019: £21m). The gross book value of the shares at  
31 December 2020 amounts to £7m. In 2020, historical contributions of £45m received from operating companies have been transferred  
from the treasury shares reserve to retained earnings. 

9. Contingencies
There are contingent liabilities that arise in the normal course of 
business in respect of indemnities, warranties and guarantees in 
relation to former subsidiaries and in respect of guarantees in relation 
to subsidiaries. In addition, there are contingent liabilities in respect of 
legal claims. None of these claims are expected to result in a material 
gain or loss to the company.

10. Audit fees
Statutory audit fees relating to the company were £35,000  
(2019: £35,000).

11. Related party transactions 

Subsidiaries

The company transacts and has outstanding balances with its 
subsidiaries. Amounts due from subsidiaries and amounts due to 
subsidiaries are disclosed on the face of the company balance sheet.

These loans are generally unsecured and interest is calculated based 
on market rates. The company has interest payable to subsidiaries  
for the year of £97m (2019: £104m) and interest and guarantee fees 
receivable from subsidiaries for the year of £46m (2019: £91m). 
Management fees payable to subsidiaries in respect of centrally 
provided services amounted to £21m (2019: £45m). Management fees 
receivable from subsidiaries in respect of centrally provided services 
amounted to £31m (2019: £35m). Dividends received from subsidiaries 
were £nil (2019: £803m).

Associates

In 2019, amounts due from related parties, disclosed on the face of the 
company balance sheet, relate to loans to Penguin Random House,  
a previous associate of the Group. The amounts outstanding were 
repaid at the point of disposal of Penguin Random House in April 2020.

Key management personnel

Key management personnel are deemed to be the members of the 
Pearson Executive Management team. 

It is this Committee which had responsibility for planning, directing and 
controlling the activities of the company in 2020. Key management 
personnel compensation is disclosed in note 36 to the consolidated 
financial statements. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information206

Notes to the company financial statements

12. Group companies
In accordance with section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 a full list of subsidiaries, partnerships, associates, joint ventures and joint 
arrangements, the country of incorporation, the registered address and the effective percentage of equity owned, as at 31 December 2020,  
is disclosed below. Unless otherwise stated, the shares are all indirectly held by Pearson plc. Unless otherwise stated, all wholly-owned and 
partly-owned subsidiaries are included in the consolidation and all associated undertakings are included in the Group’s financial statements  
using the equity method of accounting. Principal Group companies are identified in bold.

Registered company name

Pearson Central Europe Spółka z  
ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością

Pearson College Limited

Pearson DBC Holdings Inc.

Pearson Desarrollo y Capacitación 
Profesional Chile Limitada

Pearson Deutschland GmbH

Pearson Digital Learning Puerto Rico, Inc.

Pearson Dollar Finance plc†

Pearson Dollar Finance Two Limited

Pearson Educacion de Chile Limitada

Pearson Educacion de Colombia S A S

Pearson Educacion de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Pearson Educacion de Panama SA

Pearson Educacion de Peru S.A.

Pearson Educacion SA

Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte Ltd*

Pearson Education Africa (Pty) Ltd

Pearson Education Asia Limited

Pearson Education Botswana  
(Proprietary) Limited

Pearson Education do Brasil Ltda

Pearson Education Hellas SA

Pearson Education Holdings Limited†

Pearson Education Indochina Limited

Pearson Education Investments Limited

Pearson Education Korea Limited

Pearson Education Limited

Pearson Education Namibia (Pty) Limited

Pearson Education Publishing Limited

Pearson Education S.A.

Pearson Education SA

Pearson Education South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Pearson Education South Asia Pte. Ltd.

Country 
of Incorp.

Reg 
office

PL

UK

US

CL

DE

PR

UK

UK

CL

CO

MX

PA

PE

ES

SG

ZA

HK

BW

BR

GR

UK

TH

UK

KR

UK

NA

NG

UY

AR

ZA

SG

41

1

4

81

82

76

1

1

81

84

85

86

87

88

5

47

53

8

60

26

1

89

1

90

1

91

92

93

94

47

5

Wholly-owned subsidiaries

Registered company name

Country 
of Incorp.

Reg 
office

Registered company name

Country 
of Incorp.

Reg 
office

Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

US

Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. US

AEL (S) PTE Limited

Aldwych Finance Limited

ATI Professional Development LLC

Atkey Finance Limited

Axis Finance Inc.

Camsaw, Inc.

CAMSAWUSA, Inc.

Centro Cultural Americano Franquias e 
Comércio Ltda.

Century Consultants Ltd.

Certiport China Holding, LLC

Certiport, Inc.

Cogmed Systems AB

Connections Academy of Florida, LLC

Connections Academy of Iowa, LLC

Connections Academy of Maine, LLC

Connections Academy of Maryland, LLC

Connections Academy of Nevada, LLC

Connections Academy of New Mexico, LLC

Connections Academy of Oregon, LLC

SG

UK

US

IE

US

US

US

BR

US

US

US

SE

US

US

US

US

US

US

US

Connections Academy of Pennsylvania LLC US

Connections Academy of Tennessee, LLC

Connections Academy of Texas LLC

Connections Education LLC

Connections Education of Florida, LLC

Connections Education, Inc.

CTI Education Group (Pty) Limited

Dominie Press, Inc.

Dorian Finance Limited

Dorling Kindersley Australasia Pty Limited

EBNT Canada Holdings ULC

EBNT Holdings Limited

EBNT USA Holdings Inc.

eCollege.com

Edexcel Limited†

Éditions Du Renouveau Pédagogique Inc.

Education Development International Plc†

Education Resources (Cyprus) Limited

Educational Management Group, Inc.

Embanet ULC

Embanet-Compass Knowledge Group Inc.

English Language Learning and  
Instruction System, Inc.

Escape Studios Limited*

Falstaff Holdco Inc.

Falstaff Inc.

FBH, Inc.

George (Shanghai) Commercial  
Information Consulting Co., Ltd

Global George II limited*

Globe Fearon Inc.

Guangzhou Crescent Software Co., Ltd*

US

US

US

US

US

ZA

US

IE

AU

CA

CA

US

US

UK

CA

UK

CY

US

CA

US

US

UK

US

US

US

CN

HK

US

CN

3

4

5

1

4

7

4

4

29

15

13

4

4

14

20

24

28

29

31

32

37

38

40

41

4

20

4

47

17

7

48

58

57

4

4

49

50

1

51

52

44

20

54

6

4

55

4

21

53

17

61

Heinemann Education Botswana  
(Publishers) (Proprietary) Limited

IndiaCan Education Private Limited

Integral 7, Inc.

INTELLIPRO, INC.

Kagiso Education Pty Ltd

Knowledge Analysis Technologies, LLC

LCCIEB Training Consultancy., Ltd

LessonLab, Inc.

Lignum Oil Company

LION SG PTE. LTD

Longman (Malawi) Limited

Longman Australasia Pty Ltd

BW

IN

US

US

ZA

US

CN

US

US

SG

MW

AU

Longman Group(Overseas Holdings) Limited UK

Longman Indochina Acquisition, L.L.C.

Longman Kenya Limited

Longman Mocambique Ltda

Longman Swaziland (Pty) Limited

Longman Tanzania Limited*

Longman Zambia Educational Publishers  
Pty Ltd

Longman Zambia Limited

Longman Zimbabwe (Private) Ltd

Longmaned Ecuador S.A.

Lumerit Education, LLC

Major123 Limited

MeasureUp of Delaware, LLC

Modern Curriculum Inc.

Multi Treinamento e Editora Ltda

National Computer Systems Japan Co. Ltd

NCS Information Services Technology 
(Beijing) Co Ltd

NCS Pearson Pty Ltd

NCS Pearson Puerto Rico, Inc.

NCS Pearson, Inc.

Ordinate Corporation

Pearson (Beijing) Management  
Consulting Co., Ltd.

Pearson (Guizhou) Education Technology  
Co., Ltd.*

Pearson America LLC

Pearson Amsterdam B.V.

Pearson Australia Finance Unlimited

Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd

Pearson Australia Holdings Pty Ltd

Pearson Australia Pty Ltd

Pearson Benelux B.V.

Pearson Books Limited†

Pearson Brazil Finance Limited

Pearson Business Services Inc.

Pearson Canada Assessment Inc

Pearson Canada Finance Unlimited

Pearson Canada Holdings Inc

Pearson Canada Inc.

US

KE

MZ

SZ

TZ

ZM

ZM

ZW

EC

US

UK

US

US

BR

JP

CN

AU

PR

US

US

CN

CN

US

NL

UK

AU

AU

AU

NL

UK

UK

US

CA

UK

CA

CA

8

2

4

13

47

18

64

17

4

5

65

48

1

4

66

42

67

68

69

69

70

71

41

1

4

17

15

74

75

48

76

30

17

77

78

4

79

1

48

48

48

79

1

1

4

80

1

80

80

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information207

12. Group companies continued

Wholly-owned subsidiaries continued

Country 
of Incorp.

Reg 
office

Registered company name

Pearson Education Taiwan Ltd

Pearson Education, Inc.

Pearson Educational Measurement  
Canada, Inc.

Pearson Educational Publishers, LLC

Pearson Egitim Cozumleri Tikaret  
Limited Sirketi

Pearson Falstaff (Holdings) Inc.

Pearson Falstaff Holdco LLC

Pearson France

Pearson Funding Four Limited†

Pearson Funding plc†

Pearson Holdings Inc.

Pearson Holdings Southern Africa  
(Pty) Limited

Pearson Hungary LLC

Pearson India Education Services  
Private Limited

Pearson India Support Services  
Private Limited*

Pearson Institute of Higher Education

Pearson International Finance Limited†

Pearson Investment Holdings, Inc.

Pearson IOKI Spółka z ograniczoną 
odpowiedzialnością

Pearson Italia S.p.A

Pearson Japan KK

Pearson Lanka (Private) Limited

Pearson Lanka Support Services  
(Private) Limited

Pearson Lesotho (Pty) Ltd

Pearson Loan Finance No. 3 Limited

Pearson Loan Finance No. 4 Limited

Pearson Loan Finance No.5 Limited

Pearson Loan Finance No. 6 Limited

Pearson Loan Finance Unlimited

Pearson Longman Uganda Limited

Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Pearson Management Services Limited†

Pearson Management Services  
Philippines Inc.

Pearson Maryland Inc.

Pearson Netherlands B.V.

Pearson Netherlands Holdings B.V.

Pearson Nominees Limited†

Pearson Online Tutoring LLC

Pearson Overseas Holdings Limited†

Pearson PEM P.R., Inc.

Pearson Pension Nominees Limited

Pearson Pension Property Fund Limited

Pearson Pension Trustee Services Limited†

Pearson Phoenix Pty Ltd

TW

US

CA

US

TR

US

US

FR

UK

UK

US

ZA

HU

IN

IN

ZA

UK

US

PL

IT

JP

LK

LK

LS

UK

UK

UK

UK

UK

UG

MY

UK

PH

US

NL

NL

UK

US

UK

PR

UK

UK

UK

AU

Pearson Professional Assessments Limited UK

Pearson Real Estate Holdings Inc.

Pearson Real Estate Holdings Limited†

Pearson Schweiz AG

Pearson Services Limited†

Pearson Shared Services Limited†

Pearson Strand Finance Limited†

Pearson Strand Limited

US

UK

CH

UK

UK

UK

UK

96

4

36

4

100

4

4

97

1

1

4

47

25

2

16

47

1

4

98

99

101

63

12

62

1

1

1

1

1

43

59

1

33

11

79

79

1

4

1

19

1

1

1

48

1

4

1

34

1

1

1

1

Registered company name

Pearson Sweden AB

Pearson VUE Philippines, Inc.

Penguin Capital, LLC

Phumelela Publishers (Pty) Ltd*

PN Holdings Inc.

ProctorCam, Inc.

PT Efficient English Services

PVNT Limited

Reading Property Holdings LLC

Rebus Planning Associates, Inc.

Reston Publishing Company, Inc.

Rycade Capital Corporation

Shanghai AWL Education Software Ltd*

Silver Burdett Ginn Inc.

Skylight Training and Publishing Inc.

Smarthinking, Inc.

Sound Holdings Inc.

Sparrow Phoenix Pty Ltd

Spear Insurance Company Limited†

Stark Verlag GmbH

The Financial Times (I) Pvt Ltd

The Learning Edge International pty Ltd

The Waite Group Inc

TQ Catalis Limited

TQ Clapham Limited

TQ Education and Training Limited

TQ Education and Training Limited

TQ Global Limited

TQ Group Limited

TQ Holdings Limited

Trio Parent Holdings LLC

Vue Testing Services Israel Ltd

Vue Testing Services Korea Limited

Williams Education GmbH

*  In liquidation.
†  Directly owned by Pearson plc.

Country 
of Incorp.

Reg 
office

SE

PH

US

ZA

US

US

ID

UK

US

US

US

US

CN

US

US

US

US

AU

BM

DE

IN

AU

US

UK

UK

UK

SA

UK

UK

UK

US

IL

KR

DE

14

27

4

47

4

4

83

1

73

10

4

4

72

4

52

4

4

23

45

82

22

48

17

1

1

1

56

1

1

1

4

46

35

82

Subsidiary addresses

The following list includes all Pearson 
registered offices worldwide. See  
wholly-owned subsidiaries list opposite  
for each subsidiary’s registered office code.

Registered office address

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL, England

The HIVE, 3rd Floor, No 44, Pilliayar Koil Street, 
Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai,  
TN 600040, India

C T Corporation System, 155 Federal St., Suite 700, 
Boston, MA, 02110, United States

The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust 
Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle,  
DE, 19801, United States

9, #13-05/06, North Buona Vista Drive,  
The Metropolis Tower One, 138588, Singapore

Evergreen House North, Grafton Place, London,  
NW1 32DX England

1st Floor The Liffey Trust Centre, 117-126 Sheriff Street 
Upper, Dublin 1, Ireland

Plot 50371, Fairground Office Park, Gaborone, Botswana

3F, Building R2 China Merchants Tower, No.118 Jianguo 
Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China

10 The Corporation Company, 40600 Ann Arbor Rd  
E Suite 201, Plymouth, MI, 48170, United States

11 The Corporation Trust Company, 2405 York Road,  
Suite 201, Lutherville Timonium, MD, 21093-2264, 
United States

12 #1, 3, 5th Floor, East Tower, World Trade Centre,  

Echelon Square, Colombo, O1, Sri Lanka

13 820, Bear Tavern Road, West Trenton, Mercer,  

NJ, 08628, United States

14 Gustavslundsvägen 137, 167 51 Bromma,  

Stockholm, Sweden

15 Comendador Aladino Selmi Avenue, 4630, Galpão 1,  

Sala 3, Parque Cidade Campinas, City of Campinas,  
São Paulo 13069-036, Brazil

16 7th Floor, SDB2, ODC 7, 8 & 9, Survey No.01 ELCOT IT/

ITES-SEZ, Shollinganallur, Chennai, TN, TN 600119, India

17 C T Corporation System, 818 West Seventh Street,  
Suite 930, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, United States

18 The Corporation Company, 7700 E Arapahoe Rd  

Suite 220, Centennial, CO, 80112-1268, United States

19 500, 401, Calle de la Tanca Edificio Ochoa, San Juan, 

00901-1969, Puerto Rico

20 1200, South Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL, 33324, 

United States

21 Suite A7b, 3/F, No. 586 Longchang Road, Yangpu District, 

Shanghai, China

22 N-94, S-2 Outer Ring Road Panchsheel Park, Panchsheel 

Club, New Delhi, South Delhi, DL 110017, India

23 Suite 201, 25 Cooper Street, Surry Hills,  

NSW, 2010, Australia

24 C T Corporation System, 400 E Court Ave,  
Des Moines, IA, 50309, United States

25 22 B, 13 em, Népfürdő utca, Budapest

26 4 Zalogou Str., 15343 Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece

27 27/F Trident Tower, 312 Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue,  

Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines

28 C T Corporation System, 128 State St #3, Augusta,  

ME, 04330, United States

29 7 St. Paul Street, Suite 1660, Baltimore, MD, 21202, 

United States

30 C T Corporation System Inc., 1010 Dale Street North,  

St Paul, MN, 55117-5603, United States

31 The Corporation Trust Company of Nevada,  

701 S Carson St, Suite 200, Carson City, NV, 89701, 
United States

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information208

Notes to the company financial statements

12. Group companies continued

Subsidiary addresses continued

Registered office address

Registered office address

Registered office address

57 44 Chipman Hill, Suite 1000, Saint Jon, NB,  

79 Kabelweg 37, Amsterdam, 1014 BA, Netherlands

E2L 4S6, Canada

80 26 Prince Andrew Place, Don Mills, Toronto, ON,  

58 Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre, P.O. Box 49314,  

M3C 2T8, Canada

595 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V7X 1L3, Canada

81 Oficina N°117, edificio Casa Colorada, calle Merced 

59 Unit 30-01, Level 30, Tower A, Vertical Business Suite, 

N°838-A Santiago Centro, Santiago, Chile

32 C T Corporation System, 206 S Coronado Ave,  
Espanola, NM, 87532-2792, United States

33 7/F North Tower, Rockwell Business Center COR. 
Sheridan & United Street, Brgy. Highway Hills, 
Mandaluyong, Philippines

34 10 Gewerbestrasse, Cham, 6330, Switzerland

35 21, Mugyo-ro Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

36 199 Bay Street, Commerce Court West, Suite 2800, 

Toronto, ON, M5L1A9, Canada

37 C T Corporation System, 780 Commercial Street SE, STE 

100, Salem, OR, OR 97301, United States

38 C T Corporation System, 600 N. 2nd Street, Suite 401, 

Harrisburg, PA, 17101-1071, United States

39 Ulica Szamocka 8 01-748, Warszawa, Poland

40 C T Corporation System, 300 Montvue Rd, Knoxville, TN, 

37919-5546, United States

41 CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryan Street,  
Suite 900, Dallas, TX, 75201, United States

42 Numero 776, Avenida 24 de Julho, Maputo, Mozambique

43 Plot 8, Berkley Road, Old Kampala, Uganda

44 3500, 855 – 2nd Street, S.W., Calgary, AB,  

T2P 4K7, Canada

45 Power House, 7 Par-la-ville Road, PO Box 1826, 

Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda 

46 Derech Ben Gurion 2, BSR Building 9th Floor,  

Ramat Gan, 52573, Israel

47 Auto Atlantic, 4th Floor, Corner Hertzog Boulevard  

and Heerengracht, Cape Town, 8001, South Africa

48 707 Collins Street, Docklands, Melbourne, VIC,  

3008, Australia

49 190, High Holborn, London, WC1V 7BH, England

50 1611, Boul. Cremazie Est, 10th Floor, Montréal, PQ,  

H2M 2P2, Canada

Avenue 3, Bangsar South, No 8, Jalan Kerinchi,  
59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

60 Comendador Aladino Selmi Avenue, 4630,  

Galpão 1, Mezanino, Sala 5, Parque Cidade Campinas, 
City of Campinas,São Paulo, 13069-036, Brazil

61 Suite 1201 (site: self-made No. 1219), No. 85 Huacheng 

Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China

62 C/o Du Preez, LIebetrau & Co, 252 Kingsway,  
Next to USA Embassy, Maseru, Lesotho

63 MAGA ONE-Level 22, No. 200, Nawala Road, Narahenpita, 

Colombo 05, 11222, Sri Lanka

64 Room 305, Building 2, 6555 Shangchuan Road,  

Pudong District, Shanghai, China

65 Parkway House, Hannover Avenue, Blantyre, Malawi

66 Queensway House, Kaunda Street, Nairobi, Kenya

67 Robinson Bertram, 3rd Floor, Sokhzmlilio Bldg, Mbabane, 

Swaziland

68 P O Box 45, IPS Building, Maktaba Street,  

Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

69 Mlungushi Conference Centre, Centre Annex,  

Great East Road, Lusaka, Zambia

70 Stand 1515, Cnr Tourle Road/Harare Drive,  

Ardbennie, Harare, Zimbabwe

71 Andalucía y cordero E12-35. Edificio CYEDE  

piso 1, Oficina 11, Sector “La Floresta”, Quito,  
Pichincha, Ecuador

72 Suite 302-9,Block 3, No. 333 Weining Road,  

Changning District, Shanghai, China

73 C/O Pearson Education, 501 Boylston St, Boston,  

51 195, Archbishop Makarios III Avenue, Neocleous House, 

MA, 02116, United States

Limassol, 3030, Cyprus

74 Teikoku Hotel Tower 18F, 1-1-1 Uchi Saiwai-Cho,  

52 Illinois Corporation Service Company, 700 S 2nd Street, 

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Springfield, IL, 62703, United States

75 Suite 1201, Tower 2, No. 36 North Third Ring East Road, 

53 28/F, 1063 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong

Dongcheng District, Beijing, China

54 251, Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE, 19808, United 

76 268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1400, San Juan,  

States

00918, Puerto Rico

55 28 Liberty Street, New York, NY, 10005, United States

56 King Fahad Road, Olaya, Riyadh, 58774, 11515,  

Saudi Arabia

77 Suite 1208, 12/F, Tower 2, No. 36 North Third Ring  
East Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China

78 Suites 3-28 (2:3), Shi Guang Jun Yuan, No. 89 Hubin Road, 
Goden Sun Technology Industrial Park, High Technical & 
Industrial Development District, Guiyang City,  
Guizhou Province, China

82 c/o Pearson Deutschland GmbH, St.-Martin-Str. 82, 

Munich, 81541, Germany

83 30th Floor, Ratu Plaza Office Tower, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav 

9, Jakarta, 10270, Indonesia

84 Carrera 7 Nro 156 – 68, Piso 26, Bogota, Colombia

85 Calle Antonio Dovali jaime #70, Torre B, Piso 6,  

Col. Zedec ed Plaza Santa Fe, del. Álvaro Obregon, Ciudad 
de Mexico, CP 01210, Mexico

86 Punta Pacifica, Torres de las Americas,  

Torre A Piso 15 Ofic. 1517, Panama, 0832-0588, Panama

87 Cal. Los Halcones, no. 275, Urb. Limatombo, Lima, Perú

88 16, Ribera del Loira, Madrid, 28042, Spain

89 87/1 Capital Tower Building, All Seasons Place unit  

1604 – 6 16th floor, Wireless Road, Lumpini,  
Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand

90 6F Kwanjeong Building, 35, Cheonggyecheon-Ro, 

Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03188, Republic of Korea

91 Unit 7 Kingland Park, 98 Nickel Street, Prosperita,  

Windhoek, Namibia

92 8, Secretariat Road, Obafemi Awolowo Way,  

Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria

93 Juan Benito Blanco 780 – Plaza Business Center 

Montevideo, Uruguay

94 498, Libertador Ave, City of Buenos Aires. 3rd floor, 

Buenos Aires, Argentina

95 No 219, Room D, 11F, Sec 3, Beixin Road, New Taipei City, 

Xindian District, 23143, Taiwan 

96 11F, No 209, Sec. 1, Civic Blvd., Datong District, Taipei 

City, 10351, Taiwan (Province of China)

97 3-15, Immeuble Terra Nova II, Rue Henri Rol Tanguy, 

Montreuil, 93100, France

98 Ulica Jana Henryka Dąbrowskiego 77A 60-529,  

Poznań, Poland

99 16, Corso Trapani, Turin, 10100, Italy

100 Nida Kule Kozyatagi, Kozyatagi Mahallesi, Degirmen 

Sokak No:18 Kat:6 D:15, Kadikoy, Istanbul, 34742, Turkey

101 1-5-15 Kanda-Sarugakucho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information209

12. Group companies continued

Partly-owned subsidiaries

Registered company Name

Certiport China Co Ltd

Educational Publishers LLP

GED Domains LLC

GED Testing Service LLC

Heinemann Publishers (Pty) Ltd

LRTE Voxy, LLC 

LRTE Voxy, L.P

Maskew Miller Longman  
(Pty) Limited

Pearson Education Achievement 
Solutions (RF) (Pty) Limited

Pearson Pension Trustee Limited

Pearson South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Associated undertakings

Registered company Name

Avanti Learning Centres  
Private Limited‡

Karadi Path learning  
Company Private Limited‡

Learn Capital Special  
Opportunities Fund I, L.P.‡

Learn Capital Venture  
Partners II, L.P.‡

Learn Capital Venture  
Partners IIIA, L.P.‡

Country 
of Incorp.

% 
Owned

Reg 
office

CN

UK

US

US

ZA

US

US

ZA

ZA

UK

ZA

50.69 1

85

70

70

75

50

83.3

75

97.3

50

75

2

3

4

5

4

4

5

5

2

5

Country 
of Incorp.

% 
Owned

Reg 
office

IN

IN

US

US

KY

23.47 6

24.96 8

99.59 11

72.93 11

99.00 7

Learn Capital Venture Partners, L.P.‡ US

99.15 11

Peking University Pearson (Beijing) 
Cultural Development Co., Ltd

Tenyi Education Company Limited*

The Egyptian International Publishing 
Company-Longman

CN

CN

EG

45

9

49

49

12

10

*  In liquidation.
‡  

 Accounted for as an ‘Other financial asset’ within 
non-current assets.

Partly-owned subsidiaries and associated 
undertakings company addresses

Registered office address

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Suite 1804, No.99 Huichuan Road, Changning District, 
Shanghai City, China

80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL, England

C T Corporation System, 4701 Cox Road, Suite 285,  
Glen Allen, Henrico, VA, 23060-0000, United States

The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust 
Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle,  
DE, 19801, United States

Auto Atlantic, 4th Floor, Corner Hertzog Boulevard  
and Heerengracht, Cape Town, 8001, South Africa

16 Paschimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, DL, India

Campbells Corporate Services Limited, Floor 4,  
Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman,  
KY1-9010, Cayman Islands

3A Dev Regency II, First Main Road, Gandhinagar,  
Adyar, Chennai, TN, India

Suite 216, No. 127-1 Zhongguancun North Street,  
Haidian District, Beijing, China

10 10a Hussein Wassef St, Midan Missaha, Dokki Giza,  

12311, Egypt

11 Incorporating Services, Ltd. 3500 S Dupont Way,  

Dover, Kent, DE, United States

12 28/F, 1063 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information210

Five-year summary

All figures in £ millions

Sales: By operating segment

Global Online Learning

Global Assessment

North American Courseware

International

Continuing

Discontinued 

Total sales

Adjusted operating profit: By operating segment

Global Online Learning

Global Assessment

North American Courseware

International

Enabling Functions

Penguin Random House

Continuing

Discontinued 

Total adjusted operating profit

All figures in £ millions

Operating margin – continuing

Adjusted earnings

Total adjusted operating profit

Net finance costs

Income tax

Non-controlling interest

Adjusted earnings

Weighted average number of shares (millions)

Adjusted earnings per share

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

521

955

1,461

1,192

4,129

–

586

1,031

1,091

1,161

3,869

–

697

892

894

914

3,397

–

4,552

4,513

–

–

4,552

4,513

4,129

3,869

3,397

99

304

297

305

84

351

231

299

99

245

190

182

(527)

(449)

(404)

635

–

635

576

–

576

68

546

–

546

65

581

–

581

2016

13.9%

2017

12.8%

2018

13.2%

2019

15.0%

635

(59)

(95)

(2)

479

814.8

58.8p

576

(79)

(55)

(2)

440

813.4

54.1p

546

(24)

27

(2)

547

778.1

70.3p

581

(41)

(89)

(2)

449

777.0

57.8p

1

313

–

313

2020

9.2%

313

(61)

(35)

–

217

755.4

28.7p

Prior periods have not been restated to reflect the adoption of IFRS 15 and IFRS 9 in 2018 and IFRS 16 in 2019.

Periods prior to 2018 have not been restated to reflect the new organisation structure as there is no appropriate basis for restatement of  
those periods.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information211

All figures in £ millions

Cash flow

Operating cash flow

Operating cash conversion

Operating free cash flow

Operating free cash flow per share

Free cash flow

Free cash flow per share

Net assets

Net debt

Return on invested capital 

Total adjusted operating profit

Operating tax paid

Return

Gross basis:

Average invested capital

Return on invested capital

Net basis:

Average invested capital

Return on invested capital

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

663

104%

549

67.4p

310

38.0p

669

116%

525

64.5p

227

27.9p

513

94%

448

57.6p

473

60.8p

418

72%

345

44.4p

213

27.4p

315

101%

255

33.8p

229

30.3p

4,348

4,021

4,525

4,323

4,134

1,092

432

143

1,016

463

635

(63)

572

576

(75)

501

546

(43)

503

581

(9)

572

313

(10)

303

11,464

11,568

10,672

11,096

10,625

5.0%

4.3%

4.7%

5.2%

2.9%

7,906

7.2%

8,126

6.2%

7,544

6.7%

8,097

7.1%

7,708

3.9%

Dividend per share

52.0p

17.0p

18.5p

19.5p

19.5p

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information212

Financial key performance indicators

The following tables and narrative provide further analysis of the financial key performance indicators which are described in the financial review 
of the annual report on pages 29-34, shown within the key performance indicators on page 2 of the annual report and shown in notes 2 and 8 of 
the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Adjusted performance measures
The annual report and accounts reports results and performance on a headline basis which compares the reported results both on a statutory 
and on a non-GAAP (non-statutory) basis. The Group’s adjusted performance measures are non-GAAP (non-statutory) financial measures and 
are also included in the annual report as they are key financial measures used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources  
to business segments. The measures also enable investors to more easily, and consistently, track the underlying operational performance of the 
Group and its business segments by separating out those items of income and expenditure relating to acquisition and disposal transactions, 
major restructuring programmes and certain other items that are also not representative of underlying performance.

The Group’s definition of adjusted performance measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures reported by other 
companies. A reconciliation of the adjusted measures to their corresponding statutory measures is shown below.

Sales
Underlying sales movements exclude the effect of exchange, the impact of portfolio changes arising from acquisitions and disposals and the 
impact of adopting new accounting standards that are not retrospectively applied. Portfolio changes are calculated by taking account of the 
additional sales (at constant exchange rates) from acquisitions made in both the current year and the prior year. For acquisitions made in the prior 
year the additional sales excluded is calculated as the sales made in the period of the current year that corresponds to the pre-acquisition period 
in the prior year. Sales made by businesses disposed in either the current year or the prior year are also excluded. Constant exchange rates are 
calculated by assuming the average exchange rates in the prior year prevailed throughout the current year. These non-GAAP measures enable 
management and investors to track more easily, and consistently, the underlying sales performance of the Group.

All figures in £ millions

Statutory sales 2020

Statutory sales 2019

Statutory sales (decrease)/increase

Comprising:

Underlying (decrease)/increase

Portfolio changes

Exchange differences

Statutory sales (decrease)/increase

Statutory (decrease)/increase

Constant exchange rate (decrease)/increase

Underlying (decrease)/increase

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

697

586

111

892

1,031

(139)

106

(141)

4

1

111

19%

19%

18%

–

2

(139)

(13)%

(14)%

(14)%

894

1,091

(197)

(133)

(65)

1

(197)

(18)%

(18)%

(13)%

914

1,161

(247)

(218)

6

(35)

(247)

(21)%

(18)%

(19)%

Total

3,397

3,869

(472)

(386)

(55)

(31)

(472)

(12)%

(11)%

(10)%

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information213

Adjusted operating profit
Adjusted operating profit excludes the cost of major restructuring; other net gains and losses on the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates 
and other financial assets; and intangible charges, including impairment, relating only to goodwill and intangible assets acquired through business 
combinations and the direct costs of acquiring those businesses. Further details are given below under ‘Adjusted earnings per share’. Underlying 
adjusted operating profit movements exclude the effect of exchange, the impact of portfolio changes arising from acquisitions and disposals and 
the impact of adopting new accounting standards that are not retrospectively applied. Portfolio changes are calculated by taking account of the 
additional contribution (at constant exchange rates) from acquisitions made in both the current year and the prior year. 

For acquisitions made in the prior year the additional contribution excluded is calculated as the operating profit made in the period of the current  
year that corresponds to the pre-acquisition period in the prior year. Operating profit made by businesses disposed in either the current year  
or the prior year is also excluded. Constant exchange rates are calculated by assuming the average exchange rates in the prior year prevailed 
throughout the current year. This non-GAAP measure enables management and investors to track more easily, and consistently, the underlying 
operating profit performance of the Group.

All figures in £ millions

Operating profit

Cost of major restructuring

Other net gains and losses

Intangible charges

Adjusted operating profit

2020

411

–

(178)

80

313

All figures in £ millions

Adjusted operating profit (decrease)/increase 

Comprising:

Underlying (decrease)/increase

Portfolio changes 

Exchange differences

Adjusted operating profit (decrease)/increase

Constant exchange rate (decrease)/increase

Underlying (decrease)/increase

Global Online 
Learning

Global 
Assessment

North 
American 
Courseware

International

Enabling 
Functions

Penguin 
Random 
House

15

19

(3)

(1)

15

19%

23%

(106)

(41)

(117)

(107)

(48)

(116)

–

1

(106)

(30)%

(30)%

6

1

(41)

(18)%

(20)%

2

(3)

(117)

(38)%

(39)%

45

42

–

3

45

9%

9%

(64)

–

(64)

–

(64)

–

–

2019

275

159

(16)

163

581

Total

(268)

(210)

(59)

1

(268)

(46)%

(40)%

Adjusted earnings per share
Adjusted earnings includes adjusted operating profit and adjusted finance and tax charges. Adjusted earnings is included as a non-GAAP  
measure as it is used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources to business segments and by investors to more easily,  
and consistently, track the underlying operational performance of the Group over time. Adjusted earnings per share is calculated as adjusted 
earnings divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue on an undiluted basis. 

The following items are excluded from adjusted earnings:

Cost of major restructuring – In May 2017, the Group announced a restructuring programme to run between 2017 and 2019 to drive significant 
cost savings. The costs of this restructuring programme are significant enough to exclude from the adjusted operating profit measure so as to 
better highlight the underlying performance (see note 4).

Other net gains and losses – These represent profits and losses on the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and other financial assets 
and are excluded from adjusted earnings as they distort the performance of the Group as reported on a statutory basis.

Intangible charges – These represent charges in respect of intangible assets acquired through business combinations and the direct costs of 
acquiring those businesses. These charges are excluded as they reflect past acquisition activity and do not necessarily reflect the current year 
performance of the Group. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information214

Financial key performance indicators

Other net finance income/costs – These include finance costs in respect of retirement benefits, finance costs of deferred consideration and 
foreign exchange and other gains and losses. Finance income relating to retirement benefits are excluded as management does not believe  
that the consolidated income statement presentation under IAS 19 reflects the economic substance of the underlying assets and liabilities. 
Finance costs relating to acquisition transactions are excluded as these relate to future earn outs or acquisition expenses and are not part of the 
underlying financing. Foreign exchange and other gains and losses are excluded as they represent short-term fluctuations in market value and  
are subject to significant volatility. Other gains and losses may not be realised in due course as it is normally the intention to hold the related 
instruments to maturity. 

Tax – Tax on the above items is excluded from adjusted earnings. Where relevant the Group also excludes the benefit from recognising previously 
unrecognised pre-acquisition and capital losses. The tax benefit from tax deductible goodwill and intangibles is added to the adjusted income tax 
charge as this benefit more accurately aligns the adjusted tax charge with the expected rate of cash tax payments.

All figures in £ millions

Profit for the year

Non-controlling interest

Cost of major restructuring

Other net gains and losses

Intangible charges

Other net finance income

Tax

Adjusted earnings

Weighted average number of shares (millions)

Adjusted earnings per share

2020

310

–

–

(178)

80

(4)

9

217

2019

266

(2)

159

(16)

163

2

(123)

449

755.4

28.7p

777.0

57.8p

Return on invested capital
Return on invested capital (ROIC) is included as a non-GAAP measure as it is used by management to help inform capital allocation decisions 
within the business. ROIC is calculated as adjusted operating profit less operating cash tax paid expressed as a percentage of average invested 
capital. Invested capital includes the original unamortised goodwill and intangibles. Average values for total invested capital are calculated as the 
average monthly balance for the year. ROIC is also presented on a net basis after removing impaired goodwill from the invested capital balance. 
The net approach assumes that goodwill which has been impaired is treated consistently to goodwill disposed as it is no longer being used to 
generate returns. The adoption of IFRS 16 has impacted adjusted operating profit and average tangible fixed assets in 2019, however, the overall 
impact on ROIC is not material. 

All figures in £ millions

Adjusted operating profit

Operating tax paid

Return

Average goodwill

Average other non-current intangibles

Average intangible assets – pre-publication

Average tangible fixed assets and working capital

Average invested capital

Return on invested capital

2020 
Gross

313

(10)

303

6,199

2,186

906

1,334

2019 
Gross

581

(9)

572

6,645

2,394

889

1,168

10,625

11,096

2020 
Net

313

(10)

303

3,282

2,186

906

1,334

7,708

2019 
Net

581

(9)

572

3,646

2,394

889

1,168

8,097

2.9%

5.2%

3.9%

7.1%

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information215

Return on capital
Return on capital (ROC) is included as a non-GAAP measure of how efficiently we are generating returns from our asset base. ROC is calculated as 
adjusted operating profit less adjusted income tax as a proportion of capital, where capital adjusts net statutory assets for net debt, retirement 
benefit assets, other post-retirement medical obligations and other non-operating items. These adjustments to net statutory assets have been 
made to better reflect the asset base that generates returns. 

All figures in £ millions

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted income tax charge

Return

Net statutory assets

Adjustments for:

Net debt

Retirement benefit assets

Other post-retirement medical benefit obligation

Other non-operating assets

Capital

Return on capital

2020

313

(35)

278

2019

581

(89)

492

4,134

4,323

463

(410)

39

(30)

4,196

6.6%

1,016

(429)

43

(150)

4,803

10.2%

Operating cash flow
Operating cash flow is calculated as net cash generated from operations before the impact of items excluded from the adjusted income  
statement plus dividends from joint ventures and associates (less the re-capitalisation dividends from Penguin Random House); less capital 
expenditure on property, plant and equipment (including additions to right of use assets) and intangible software assets; plus proceeds from the 
sale of property, plant and equipment (including the impacts of transfers to/from investment in finance lease receivable) and intangible software 
assets; plus special pension contributions paid; and plus cost of major restructuring paid. Operating cash flow is included as a non-GAAP measure 
in order to align the cash flows with the corresponding adjusted operating profit measures.

All figures in £ millions

Net cash generated from operations

Dividends from joint ventures and associates

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 

Addition of new right-of-use lease assets

Purchase of intangible software assets

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

Net disposal of right-of-use lease assets including transfers to/from investment in finance lease receivable

Investment income

Net costs paid for major restructuring

Operating cash flow

2020

450

4

(53)

(61)

(81)

–

18

–

38

315

2019

480

64

(55)

(64)

(138)

1

17

2

111

418

Cash conversion, calculated as operating cash flow as a percentage of adjusted operating profit, is also shown as a non-GAAP measure as this is 
used by management and investors to measure cash generation by the Group. 

All figures in £ millions

Adjusted operating profit

Operating cash flow

Cash conversion

2020

313

315

101%

2019

581

418

72%

Operating cash flow, operating free cash flow and total free cash flow, which are non-GAAP measures, are disclosed and reconciled in note 33 of 
the notes to the consolidated financial statements as they are commonly used by investors to measure the cash performance of the Group.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information216

Financial key performance indicators

Net debt and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA)
For information, the net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio is shown as a non-GAAP measure as it is commonly used by investors to measure balance 
sheet strength. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as adjusted operating profit less depreciation on property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets 
and less amortisation on intangible software assets.

All figures in £ millions

Adjusted operating profit

Depreciation (excluding items included in ‘cost of major restructuring’)

Amortisation on intangible software assets (excluding items included in ‘cost of major restructuring’)

Adjusted EBITDA

Cash and cash equivalents

Investment in finance lease receivable

Derivative financial instruments

Bank loans and overdrafts

Revolving credit facility

Bonds

Lease liabilities

Net debt

Net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio

2020

2019

313

125

112

550

1,116

130

11

(3)

–

(965)

(752)

(463)

0.8x

581

122

101

804

437

196

15

(3)

(230)

(593)

(838)

(1,016)

1.3x

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information217

Glossary of major products and services

Accelerated pathways: a corporate education 
benefit, where Pearson partners with companies 
to improve employee development by focusing  
on the educational needs of a specific business 
and its people, helping to strategically align 
educational assistance spending to the talent 
objectives of the organisation. 

Artificial intelligence (AI): describes machines  
that can sense and interact with environments  
in a perception-planning-action cycle, or with 
other machines, without explicit programming. 
This is typically accomplished through Machine 
Learning (ML) which is the development, and 
application of algorithms that improve their 
performance (inference) at some task based  
on experience (training). Pearson takes a 
human-centric perspective of AI that considers 
the entire learning ecosystem when developing  
AI capabilities including ethics, privacy, 
appropriate uses and user needs.

BTEC: taught in colleges, schools and university 
throughout the world, a BTEC gives learners of  
all levels and ages the knowledge and skills they 
need for career success, now and into the future. 
The unique experience BTEC learners get of 
having to apply the knowledge and skills they’ve 
learned to real-life scenarios means more 
employers and learners are choosing BTEC.

  BTEC Level 1/Level 2 Firsts: BTEC Firsts allow 
level 2 learners to develop knowledge and 
understanding by applying their learning and 
skills in real-life scenarios. Combined with  
other qualifications, they enable learners to 
progress to further study, an apprenticeship,  
or into employment

  BTEC Level 1/Level 2 Tech Awards: studied 
alongside GCSE, BTEC Tech Awards provide  
a great introduction to a professional sector 
where students learn transferable skills they’ll 
use if they progress to further study, and in  
their future career

  BTEC Level 2 Technicals: designed in 
collaboration with employers and industry 
professionals, BTEC Level 2 Technicals provide 
career-focused, applied courses for post-16  
level 2 learners in a specialist occupational area. 
They support progression to an apprenticeship, 
to further technical study, or into the workplace

  BTEC Level 3 Nationals: allow level 3 learners  
to apply their learning in real-life scenarios to 
develop the specialist knowledge and skills  
they need to progress towards their chosen 
career path, whether that is through further or 
higher education, an apprenticeship or directly 
into the workplace

  BTEC Higher Nationals: available at levels 4 and 
5, BTEC Higher Nationals are internationally 
recognised, career-focused higher education 
courses which are the same level as the first and 
second years of a degree course. Co-designed 
with employers and representing the most 
up-to-date professional standards, they support 
learners to develop the real-world knowledge, 
skills and behaviours needed to succeed, 
allowing them to move on to complete degree 
and progress in their chosen career path. 

Clinical Assessment: our Clinical Assessment 
business provides assessments to help 
professionals improve lives by providing valuable 
information that can identify and manage an 
individual learner’s strengths and weaknesses 
and learning barriers. The Clinical Assessment 
portfolio offers a range of assessments serving a 
diverse audience of professionals including 
Psychologists, Speech Language Pathologists, 
Occupational Therapists and more. These 
professionals rely on leading measures like the 
Wechsler Scales of Intelligence, which assess  
an individual’s cognitive strengths and 
weaknesses or the Minnesota Multiphasic 
Personality Inventory (MMPI), a world-renowned 
measure of psychopathology and personality. 

Other examples of our Clinical products include:

  Behavior Assessment System for Children-Third 
Edition (BASC-3): a comprehensive set of rating 
scales and forms to help children thrive in their 
school and home environments through 
effective behaviour assessment. BASC provides 
a complete picture of child and adolescent 
behaviour. School and clinical psychologists 
have depended on BASC for more than 20 years. 

  Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-Third 
Edition (GFTA-3): a systematic means of 
assessing an individual’s ability to pronounce 
different speech sounds of Standard American 
English in order to diagnose different disorders 
which can inhibit an individual’s articulation.  
It provides information about an individual’s 
speech sound ability by sampling both 
spontaneous and imitative sound production  
in single words and connected speech. 

Connections Academy: The Connections Academy 
online school programme for grades K-12 is a 
comprehensive collection of online learning 
products and school support services for online 
public schools across the US, most of which carry 
the Connections Academy name. In addition, 
Pearson Online Academy is a private online school 
for grades K-12 and serves students worldwide.

Digitally–enabled learning: learning that  
is enabled through digital media, tools  
or technology.

GED: GED Testing Service is a joint venture 
between Pearson and the American Council on 
Education, and is part of a programme which 
measures proficiency in language arts, maths, 
science and social studies. It enables learners to 
obtain their high school equivalency credential,  
be placed in college courses, and even earn 
college credit. In addition to the actual GED test, 
GED also offers a suite of products and services 
delivered through Pearson VUE to help people 
prepare for their assessments, including GED 
Ready, a predictive practice test that provides 
learners with a detailed score report, which 
outlines areas of mastery and areas requiring 
more attention, giving learners the tools they 
need to be successful. 

Inclusive Access: provides all US college students 
with equal and affordable access to course 
materials by their first day of class eliminating  
key hurdles to their academic success. Inclusive 
Access can also provide institutions a valuable  
tool to help increase retention by lowering the 
withdraw and fail rates caused by the lack of 
students preparedness. By utilising Inclusive 
Access institutions can drive down the overall  
cost of attendance for students by realising 
savings in using digital course materials rather 
than new print materials. 

Lumerit Education: Acquired by Pearson in 2019, 
and integrated within Accelerated Pathways, 
Lumerit helps learners address the issues of 
college degree completion and affordability in the 
consumer and corporate markets. Lumerit uses 
data and analytics to match learner profiles to 
academic programmes.

  Q-interactive: a digital system for administering 
and scoring tests in a one-on-one setting 
between an examiner and examinee. Testing 
takes place on two iPads with an app called 
Assess. The simplicity of the system improves 
accuracy and speed in providing real-time 
scoring and allows for greater flexibility. 

MePro: a complete, blended service solution  
for English Language Learning, which provides  
a personalised learning experience through 
courseware and assessment linked to the Global 
Scale of English (GSE), remediation and stretch 
content for personalised learning, professional 
development for teachers and a parent app. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information218

Glossary of major products and services

Online proctoring: Pearson’s OnVUE online 
proctoring enables test takers to take certification 
exams securely from their home or office via a 
highly secure, online platform. The test involves  
a simple check-in process, with ID verification, 
face-matching technology and a live greeter. In 
2020 Pearson saw a 10-fold increase in remote 
and online proctoring services as a result of the 
pandemic – that’s 2.1m assessments.

Pearson Pathways: Designed to uncomplicate  
the education decision process, Pathways is 
Pearson’s direct to consumer online marketplace 
for online learning programs that matches  
people to online degree programs, bootcamps, 
credentials. Users can research and compare 
programs, review tuition rates, get real human 
help, and apply to programs with a single 
application, free of charge.

Remote proctoring: in our Pearson VUE business, 
remote proctoring is when a proctor and a 
test-taker are not physically located in the same 
room. In most cases, the testing candidate takes 
their entire exam on a computer while the proctor 
watches through an online video camera. ‘Remote 
proctoring’ is often synonymous with ‘online 
proctoring.’ Pearson VUE’s online proctoring 
solution is called OnVUE. 

Online Program Management (OPM): a market in 
which Pearson is a provider by partnering with 
colleges and universities around the world to 
bring their degrees and short courses online, 
helping students gain skills for the changing world 
of work. Pearson provides the upfront capital and 
infrastructure that institutions need, as well as 
providing services such as student enrolment and 
retention, course design and development, and 
market research and insights. 

Pearson Advance: Pearson launched Pearson 
Advance offering learners an affordable, 
accessible catalogue of flexible, short, online 
courses from leading experts and universities.  
A partnership with edX provides access to 
Professional Certificates, MicroMasters, as well  
as Pearson’s IT-related courses, while employers 
find solutions to help fill skill gaps and deliver 
upskilling opportunities for existing employees.

Pearson Institute of Higher Education (PIHE):  
Pearson Institute of Higher Education (Pty)  
Ltd. is in South Africa and is registered with the 
Department of Higher Education and Training  
as a private higher education institution under  
the Higher Education Act, 101, of 1997. We have  
12 campuses across South Africa. Our campuses 
engage in a range of employability initiatives  
in order to enhance students success in the 
workplace. We have over 31 qualifications and 
programmes across a range of faculties, all 
equipping students with the skills they need in  
the workplace. We use an optimal combination of 
technology-enhanced and traditional learning 
methods, as well as practical application, to 
prepare students for the technology-driven and 
fast-changing work environment of the 21st 
century. Producing employable graduates is a 
priority for Pearson Institute. 

Pearson Learning Platform (PLP): ultimately 
Pearson’s single product platform that leverages 
best-in-class technology to deliver the future 
generation of global digital learning experiences. 
The PLP is not a product, but it will change the  
way we design and deliver products, providing a 
modern, reliable consumer grade experience 
across all devices in all geographies. Products  
built on PLP will deliver improved outcomes and 
provide a user-centered, globally consistent, 
locally optimised, learning experience for  
our customers.

Pearson Prep: provides customised study 
sessions to help students revise and prioritise 
their time to helps them decide when they are 
ready for their exams. Students can practice  
with online flashcards created from their own 
notes or written by experts to help them prepare 
more effectively.

Pearson Writer: provides support to help students 
with writing essays, citing references, and 
managing projects.

PTE Academic (Pearson Test of English Academic): 
the fast and fair computerised English proficiency 
test that is trusted and used by institutions and 
governments around the world. It is now accepted 
by the UK Government, alongside the Australian 
and New Zealand governments and thousands  
of colleges and universities. A PTE Academic  
test can be booked up to 24 hours in advance,  
with 84% of test results delivered within 48 hours, 
PTE Academic is the convenient and efficient 
choice for study and work. 

To note: PTE Academic UKVI is the name for  
those taking the test for UK Visa and  
Immigration purposes

PTE Home (Pearson Test of English Home): 
approved by the UK Home Office for all family 
visas, as well as for settlement and citizenship,  
PTE Home offers a fast and reliable service to help 
make immigration to the UK as straightforward as 
possible. Developed to test candidates speaking 
and listening skills, there are three test levels  
to choose from. Fast, reliable and convenient:  
PTE Home tests can be booked up to 24 hours in 
advance and with a simple pass or fail result,  
most test-takers will receive their results within 
just 48 hours.

Pearson VUE: Pearson Virtual University 
Enterprises (VUE) is a comprehensive computer-
based testing company that develops and delivers 
millions of high-stakes certification and licensure 
exams for professionals around the globe each 
year. Pearson VUE clients include many of the 
most highly regarded and highly respected 
high-stakes exam owners in every industry from 
academia and admissions to IT and healthcare. 
Pearson VUE is the global leader in exam 
development and psychometric services, 
programme management tools and services, 
diverse exam delivery options including online 
proctored and client proctored, and boasts the 
most expansive and highly secure network of 
20,000 global test centres in nearly 200 countries. 

Revel: improves results by empowering students 
to actively participate in learning. More than a 
digital textbook, Revel delivers an engaging blend 
of author content, media, and assessment. With 
Revel, students read and practice in one 
continuous experience – anytime, anywhere, on 
any device. With assignment and tracking tools, 
Revel also enables instructors to gauge student 
understanding and engagement with the material 
inside and outside the classroom, empowering 
them to spend class time on meaningful 
instruction. For example, each additional five 
hours a student spent on Revel Psychology 
readings was associated with an increase of  
2.19 (±1.10) percentage points on unit exams.

Sistemas: a complete package of products and 
services for private and public K-12 schools in 
Brazil. With a single price per student, we provide 
courseware, educational assistance, professional 
development, management consulting, and 
marketing support, as well as digital content. 

Smarthinking: expert online tutoring and writing 
review that gives students 24x7 access to 
academic help from live professional educators 
and uses a proven, problem-solving approach to 
help students learn, gain confidence, and handle 
future assignments on their own. Complementing 
Pearson content and technology solutions, 
Smarthinking’s human delivered services have  
20 years of experience improving student 
performance, course persistence, and overall 
retention. Karen Reilly, Campus Dean of Learning 
Support at Valencia College, reports “The results 
of our analysis show that Smarthinking is an 
important component in our overall academic 
support programme; it is essential that students 
have access to tutoring assistance after hours  
and on weekends – whenever a learning moment 
is happening.” 

The Enabling Programme (TEP): one of Pearson’s 
largest business transformation projects.  
Its aim is to make us a simpler organisation,  
with globally consistent ways of working across 
HR, finance, procurement, supply chain,  
and rights and royalties. 

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information219

In the US Higher Education landscape, we partner 
and provide products and services to a diverse 
array of educational institutions including: 

  Community College: sometimes called junior 
colleges, are two-year schools that provide 
affordable postsecondary education as a 
pathway to a four-year degree

  Private Not For Profit: a private foundation that 
is engaged in social or public benefit activities 
and is registered as such with the IRS. It derives 
its revenue from a small group of donors 
without any intention of earning income for  
its owners. All the profits and donations  
of a not-for-profit organisation are used in  
operating the organisation as per its  
objectives (i.e., charity or public service)

  4 Year Public Universities: a university offering  
a Bachelor’s degree that is predominantly  
funded by public means through a national  
or subnational government, as opposed to 
private universities 

  For-Profit Universities: a university that  
is owned and run by a private organisation  
or corporation. 

US School Assessment Business: helps young 
children and students reach their educational 
aspirations through meaningful feedback.  
Testing plays an integral role in determining 
educator and student success, and we are the 
largest provider of educational assessment 
services in the US. We partner with departments 
of education and educators to develop 
customised, effective, and scalable assessments 
that measure 21st century skills and inform 
instruction throughout the school year. We also 
partner with test providers to deliver their paper 
and/or online assessments. Examples of the  
tests we support include:

  SAT: an entrance exam used by most colleges 
and universities to make admissions decisions.  
It is a multiple-choice, pencil-and-paper test with 
the purpose to measure a high school student’s 
readiness for college, and provide colleges with 
one common data point that can be used to 
compare all applicants

  National Assessment of Educational  
Progress (NAEP): The National Assessment  
of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the largest 
nationally representative and continuing 
assessment of what America’s students know 
and can do in various subject areas

  ACT: The ACT® test is the nation’s most popular 
college entrance exam accepted and valued  
by all universities and colleges in the US.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther information220

Shareholder information

Pearson ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange  
and on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American 
Depositary Receipts.

Corporate website
The investors’ section of our corporate website plc.pearson.com/
investors provides a wealth of information for shareholders.  
It is also possible to sign up to receive email alerts for reports  
and press releases relating to Pearson at plc.pearson.com/en-GB/
investors/shareholders

Shareholder information online
Shareholder information can be found on our website at  
plc.pearson.com/investors

Our registrar, Equiniti, also provides a range of shareholder information 
online. You can check your holding and find practical help on 
transferring shares or updating your details at www.shareview.co.uk. 
For more information, please contact our registrar, Equiniti, Aspect 
House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex, BN99 6DA. Telephone 
0371 384 2043* or, for those shareholders with hearing difficulties, 
textphone number 0371 384 2255*.

Information about the Pearson share price
The company’s share price can be found on our website at  
plc.pearson.com/investors/performance/share-price-dividend.  
It also appears in the financial columns of the national press.

Share dealing facilities
Equiniti offers telephone and internet services for dealing in Pearson 
shares. For further information, please contact their telephone  
dealing helpline on 03456 037 037* or, for online dealing, log on to  
www.shareview.co.uk/dealing. You will need your shareholder 
reference number as shown on your share certificate.

A postal dealing service is also available through Equiniti.  
Please telephone 0371 384 2248* for details or log on to  
www.shareview.co.uk to download a form.

*  Lines open 8.30 am to 5.30 pm Monday to Friday (excluding UK public holidays).

ShareGift
Shareholders with small holdings of shares, whose value makes  
them uneconomic to sell, may wish to donate them to ShareGift,  
the share donation charity (registered charity number 1052686). 
Further information about ShareGift and the charities it has supported 
may be obtained from their website, www.ShareGift.org, or by 
contacting them at ShareGift, PO Box 72253, London, SW1P 9LQ.

American Depositary Receipts (ADRs)
Pearson’s ADRs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and  
traded under the symbol PSO. Each ADR represents one ordinary 
share. For enquiries regarding registered ADR holder accounts  
and dividends, please contact Bank of New York Mellon,  
Shareholder Correspondence (ADR), PO Box 505000, Louisville,  
KY 40233-5000, telephone 1 (866) 259 2289 (toll free within the US)  
or 001 201 680 6825 (outside the US). Alternatively, you may email 
shrrelations@cpushareownerservices.com

2020 dividends

Interim

Final1

Payment date

Amount per share

21 September 2020

6 pence

7 May 2021

13.5 pence

Voting rights for registered ADR holders can be exercised through Bank 
of New York Mellon, and for beneficial ADR holders (and/or nominee 
accounts) through your US brokerage institution. Pearson will file with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission a Form 20-F.

1  Subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.

2021 financial calendar

Ex-dividend date

Record date

Last date for dividend reinvestment election

Annual General Meeting

25 March 2021

26 March 2021

15 April 2021

30 April 2021

Payment date for dividend and share purchase date for 
dividend reinvestment

7 May 2021

Payment of dividends to mandated accounts
Should you elect to have your dividends paid through BACS, this can  
be done directly into a bank or building society account, with the tax 
voucher sent to the shareholder’s registered address. Equiniti can be 
contacted for information on 0371 384 2043*.

Dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP)
The DRIP gives shareholders the right to buy the company’s shares  
on the London stock market with their cash dividend. For further 
information, please contact Equiniti on 0371 384 2268*.

Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs)
Equiniti offers ISAs in Pearson shares. For more information,  
please go to www.shareview.co.uk/dealing or call customer  
services on 0345 300 0430*.

Share register fraud: protecting your investment
Pearson does not contact its shareholders directly to provide 
recommendations or investment advice and neither does it  
appoint third parties to do so. As required by law, our shareholder 
register is available for public inspection but we cannot control  
the use of information obtained by persons inspecting the register. 
Please treat any approaches purporting to originate from  
Pearson with caution.

For more information, please log on to our website at  
plc.pearson.com/en-GB/investors/shareholders/shares-shareholding

Tips on protecting your shares
  Keep any documentation that contains your shareholder reference 
number in a safe place and shred any unwanted documentation

  Inform our registrar, Equiniti, promptly when you change address 

   Be aware of dividend payment dates and contact the registrar  
if you do not receive your dividend cheque or, better still,  
make arrangements to have the dividend paid directly into  
your bank account

  Consider holding your shares electronically in a CREST account  
via a nominee.

Pearson plc Annual report and accounts 2020Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOther informationDesigned and produced by Friend www.friendstudio.com 
Print: Pureprint Group

As part of its offsetting commitments Pearson has offset the carbon dioxide 
generated by the production of this report and associated documents. 

This report has been printed on Edixion Challenger Offset which is  
FSC® certified and made from 100% Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF) pulp.  
The mill and the printer are both certified to ISO 14001 environmental 
management system. The report was printed using vegetable-based inks  
by a CarbonNeutral® printer.

Reliance on this document 
The intention of this document is to provide information to shareholders and 
is not designed to be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose. 

Forward-looking statements 
This document includes forward-looking statements concerning Pearson’s 
financial condition, business and operations and its strategy, plans and 
objectives. In particular, all statements that express forecasts, expectations 
and projections, including trends in results of operations, margins, growth 
rates, overall market trends, the impact of interest or exchange rates, the 
availability of financing, anticipated cost savings and synergies and the 
execution of Pearson’s strategy, are forward-looking statements. 

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown 
risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on 
circumstances that may occur in the future. They are based on numerous 
expectations, assumptions and beliefs regarding Pearson’s present and 
future business strategies and the environment in which it will operate in the 
future. There are various factors which could cause Pearson’s actual financial 
condition, results and development to differ materially from the plans, goals, 
objectives and expectations expressed or implied by these forward-looking 
statements, many of which are outside Pearson’s control. These include 
international, national and local conditions, as well as the impact of 
competition. They also include other risks detailed from time to time in 
Pearson’s publicly-filed documents and, in particular, the risk factors set  
out in this document, which you are advised to read. Any forward-looking 
statements speak only as of the date they are made and, except as required  
by law, Pearson gives no undertaking to update any forward-looking 
statements in this document whether as a result of new information,  
future developments, changes in its expectations or otherwise. Readers are 
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. 

pearsonplc.com
@pearsonplc

P

e

a

r

s

o

n

A

n

n

u

a

l

r

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

a

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

2

0

Pearson plc

Registered number 53723 (England)

Principal offices

80 Strand, 
London WC2R 0RL, UK  
T +44 (0)20 7010 2000 
F +44 (0)20 7010 6060

221 River Street,  
Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA 
T +1 201 236 7000