2016 Annual Report & Form 10-K
MISSION STATEMENT
To be the most significant regional community bank
(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:37)(cid:47)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:41)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:54)
(cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:60)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:72) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:72) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:10)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:86) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)
(cid:21)
(cid:22)
(cid:23)
(cid:24)
(cid:25)
(cid:25)
(cid:26)
(cid:41)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:16)(cid:46) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17) 8
(cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:86) (cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:17) 99
1 Dear Shareholder,
2016 was a successful year for the Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (PWOD) family. We continue to focus on generating
high-quality loans and building on our core deposit base. This concentration of efforts, combined with the spectacular
work our people do every day, is the reason we have seen and will continue to see success.
Financial Highlights
PWOD continued to return strong results during the past year. Highlights from the period ending December 31, 2016
include:
Net Income
Basic & Diluted EPS
Total Deposits
Core Deposits
Net Loans
Total Assets
Company Highlights
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2016
$12,475,000
$2.64
$1,095,214,000
$876,839,000
$1,080,785,000
$1,348,590,000
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2015
$13,898,000
$2.91
$1,031,880,000
$810,504,000
$1,033,163,000
$1,320,057,000
% Change
(10.24)%
(9.28)%
6.14%
8.18%
4.61%
2.16%
Indirect Lending Is Implemented – 2016
JSSB has added a product to its collection via Indirect Auto Lending with Luzerne Bank rolling this product
out in 2017. A customer retention strategy has been developed to target those customers residing in the company’s
geographical footprint in order to increase the share of wallet.
Hughesville/Muncy Branch Set To Open – 2017
JSSB continues to expand its service area by opening an office at 3081 Route 405 Highway, Muncy, Pennsylvania
17756. The branch will feature a full-service banking center as well as offices to be utilized by loan officers,
financial services representatives and other personnel.
Conyngham Valley Branch Set To Open – 2017
Luzerne Bank looks to continue to expand its service area by opening an office at 669 State Route 93, Sugarloaf,
Pennsylvania 18249. The branch will be located inside Gould’s Market and will offer a full-service banking center.
Snow Shoe Branch Set To Open – 2017
JSSB continues to expand its service area by opening an office at 491 Sycamore Road, Snow Shoe, Pennsylvania
16874. The branch will feature a full-service banking center in the Hall’s Market shopping facility.
Williamsport Branch Gets A Facelift – 2017
The JSSB Headquarters office is in the process of receiving a much-needed facelift.
The first floor will feature all-new renovations, increasing the convenience and comfort
of our customers, as well as updating the overall aesthetics.
Final Note
We thank you for making Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. your investment choice and want you
to also make JSSB and Luzerne Bank your preferences for fulfilling all of your financial
needs.
Sincerely,
Richard A. Grafmyre, CFP®
President & CEO
2
Three Year Financial Highlights
DILUTED
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
$3.25
3.00
3.03
2.91
2.64
2.75
2.50
2.25
RETURN ON
AVERAGE EQUITY
(Percent)
DIVIDENDS
PER
SHARE
12.00
11.00
10.79
10.00
9.00
8.00
10.11
8.96
1.88
1.88
1.88
$2.25
2.00
1.75
1.50
1.25
2014
2015
2016
2014
2015
2016
2014
2015
2016
YEAR-END
DEPOSITS
(In Millions)
$1,200
1,100
1,095
1,032
1,000
981
900
800
RETURN ON
AVERAGE ASSETS
(Percent)
YEAR-END
LOANS
(In Millions)
1.50
1.25
1.19
1.00
0.75
0.50
1.08
0.93
1,081
1,033
$1,200
1,100
1,000
900
905
800
2014
2015
2016
2014
2015
2016
2014
2015
2016
3
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
ASSETS:
Noninterest-bearing balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2016
2015
$
26,766
16,905
43,671
22,044
752
22,796
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities, trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL ASSETS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
133,492
58
1,953
1,093,681
(12,896)
1,080,785
24,275
3,672
27,332
586
17,104
1,799
8,397
5,466
$ 1,348,590
176,157
73
757
1,045,207
(12,044)
1,033,163
21,830
3,686
26,667
899
17,104
1,240
8,990
6,695
$ 1,320,057
LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Noninterest-bearing deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,007,109 and 5,004,984 shares
issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
791,937
303,277
1,095,214
13,241
85,998
455
15,433
1,210,341
$
751,797
280,083
1,031,880
46,638
91,025
426
13,809
1,183,778
—
41,726
50,075
61,610
—
41,708
49,992
58,038
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Defined benefit plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock at cost, 272,452 and 257,852 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(639)
(4,289)
(10,234)
138,249
$ 1,348,590
258
(4,057)
(9,660)
136,279
$ 1,320,057
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Investment securities:
Taxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend and other interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
42,056
$
39,134
$
36,495
2,424
1,498
835
46,813
3,547
46
1,974
5,567
3,426
2,795
769
46,124
3,129
116
1,974
5,219
5,111
3,453
547
45,606
2,995
54
1,913
4,962
NET INTEREST INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41,246
40,905
40,644
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,196
2,300
2,850
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES . . . . . . . .
40,050
38,605
37,794
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities gains (losses), trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsylvania shares tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,249
1,611
58
684
2,102
795
1,098
3,516
12,113
17,813
2,223
2,793
873
312
767
740
366
9,204
35,091
17,072
4,597
12,475
EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2.64
2,383
2,592
(22)
720
1,743
781
1,064
3,504
12,765
17,023
2,248
2,622
954
661
867
612
311
8,438
33,736
17,634
3,736
13,898
2.91
$
$
2,419
3,515
—
923
1,803
1,146
1,077
3,625
14,508
17,273
2,301
2,536
907
661
746
532
345
8,589
33,890
18,412
3,804
14,608
3.03
$
$
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED. . 4,735,457
4,772,239
4,816,149
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1.88
$
1.88
$
1.88
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net realized gain included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Accretion) amortization of unrecognized pension and post-retirement items. . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
12,475
$
2015
13,898
$
2014
14,608
$
252
(85)
(1,611)
547
(352)
120
(1,129)
11,346
$
(1,457)
495
(2,592)
882
817
(277)
(2,132)
11,766
$
11,242
(3,822)
(3,515)
1,195
(2,837)
964
3,227
$
17,835
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
SHARES
AMOUNT
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
RETAINED
EARNINGS
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
(LOSS) INCOME
TREASURY
STOCK
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . .
4,999,929
$ 41,665
$
49,800
$
47,554
$
(4,894) $
(6,310) $
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,720
23
96
Purchase of treasury stock (17,238
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2014 . . . . . .
5,002,649
41,688
49,896
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,335
20
96
Purchase of treasury stock (60,018
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2015 . . . . . .
5,004,984
41,708
49,992
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,125
18
83
Purchase of treasury stock (14,600
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,608
(9,055)
53,107
13,898
(8,967)
58,038
12,475
(8,903)
3,227
(1,667)
(2,132)
(3,799)
(1,129)
(747)
(7,057)
(2,603)
(9,660)
(574)
127,815
14,608
3,227
(9,055)
119
(747)
135,967
13,898
(2,132)
(8,967)
116
(2,603)
136,279
12,475
(1,129)
(8,903)
101
(574)
Balance, December 31, 2016 . . . . . .
5,007,109
$ 41,726
$
50,075
$
61,610
$
(4,928) $
(10,234) $
138,249
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
$
12,475
$
13,898
$
14,608
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums. . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Originations of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities (gains) losses, trading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from calls and maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of bank premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of regulatory stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for investing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from long-term borrowings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
3,146
366
1,196
870
(1,611)
(68,362)
69,268
(2,102)
(58)
3,826
(3,753)
(684)
1,543
(7)
16,113
44,829
25,558
(28,322)
(49,590)
(4,061)
859
(27)
—
3,160
(3,178)
(10,772)
40,140
23,194
—
(5,027)
(33,397)
(8,903)
101
(574)
15,534
20,875
22,796
43,671
3,366
311
2,300
873
(2,592)
(56,058)
57,594
(1,743)
22
709
(804)
(720)
209
(1,630)
15,735
65,672
22,859
(32,776)
(130,803)
(2,285)
1,868
(30)
—
10,790
(12,818)
(77,523)
13,756
36,705
30,625
(10,776)
5,820
(8,967)
116
(2,603)
64,676
2,888
19,908
22,796
$
3,078
345
2,850
672
(3,515)
(51,119)
53,998
(1,803)
—
—
—
(923)
124
423
18,738
102,145
13,354
(47,902)
(101,816)
(2,795)
1,059
(30)
367
3,955
(4,583)
(36,246)
(17,584)
26,001
—
(26)
14,102
(9,055)
119
(747)
12,810
(4,698)
24,606
19,908
$
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7 UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-17077
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967
Williamsport, Pennsylvania
23-2226454
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
17703-0967
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (570) 322-1111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $8.33 per share
Name of each exchange which registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
8
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
No
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant $198,763,192 at June 30, 2016.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Common Stock, $8.33 Par Value
Outstanding at March 1, 2017
4,734,952 Shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement prepared in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held
on April 25, 2017 are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
9
ITEM
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
INDEX
PART I
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Item 9.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Index to Exhibits
Signatures
PAGE
11
16
19
19
21
21
21
24
25
42
43
91
91
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
96
97
10
ITEM 1
BUSINESS
A. General Development of Business and History
PART I
On January 7, 1983, Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania as a bank holding company. In connection with the organization of the Company, Jersey Shore State Bank ("JSSB"),
a Pennsylvania state-chartered bank, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On June 1, 2013 the Company acquired
Luzerne Bank ("Luzerne") with Luzerne operating as a subsidiary of the Company (JSSB and Luzerne are collectively referred
to as the "Banks"). The Company’s two other wholly-owned subsidiaries are Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc. and
Woods Investment Company, Inc. The Company’s business has consisted primarily of managing and supervising the Banks, and
its principal source of income has been dividends paid by the Banks and Woods Investment Company, Inc.
The Banks are engaged in commercial and retail banking which includes the acceptance of time, savings, and demand deposits,
the funding of commercial, consumer, and mortgage loans, and safe deposit services. Utilizing a branch office network, ATMs,
Internet, and telephone banking delivery channels, the Banks deliver their products and services to the communities they reside
in.
In October 2000, JSSB acquired The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”). The M Group,
which operates as a subsidiary of JSSB, offers insurance and securities brokerage services. Securities are offered by The M Group
through Voya Financial a registered broker-dealer.
Neither the Company nor the Banks anticipate that compliance with environmental laws and regulations will have any material
effect on capital expenditures, earnings, or their competitive position. The Banks are not dependent on a single customer or a few
customers, the loss of whom would have a material effect on the business of the Banks.
JSSB employed 229 persons, Luzerne employed 63 persons, and The M Group employed 4 persons as of December 31, 2016 in
either a full-time or part-time capacity. The Company does not have any employees. The principal officers of the Banks also
serve as officers of the Company.
Woods Investment Company, Inc., a Delaware holding company, maintains an investment portfolio that is managed for total return
and to fund dividend payments to the Company.
Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc. serves the Company through its acquisition and ownership of certain properties
utilized by the Bank.
We post publicly available reports required to be filed with the SEC on our website, www.jssb.com, as soon as reasonably practicable
after filing such reports with the SEC. The required reports are available free of charge through our website. Information available
on our website is not part of or incorporated by reference into this Report or any other report filed by this Company with the SEC.
B. Regulation and Supervision
The Company is a registered bank holding company and, as such is subject to the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act
of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”) and to supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(the “FRB”). The Banks are also subject to the supervision and examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
“FDIC”), as their primary federal regulator and as the insurer of the Banks' deposits. The Banks are also regulated and examined
by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (the “Department”).
The insurance activities of The M Group are subject to regulation by the insurance departments of the various states in which The
M Group, conducts business including principally the Pennsylvania Department of Insurance. The securities brokerage activities
of The M Group are subject to regulation by federal and state securities commissions.
The FRB has issued regulations under the BHCA that require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and
managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. As a result, the FRB, pursuant to such regulations, may require the Company to stand
ready to use its resources to provide adequate capital funds to the Banks during periods of financial stress or adversity. The BHCA
requires the Company to secure the prior approval of the FRB before it can acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any
bank, or acquire ownership or control of 5% or more of any voting shares of any bank. Such a transaction would also require
approval of the Department.
11 A bank holding company is prohibited under the BHCA from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of, more than
5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities unless the FRB, by order or regulation, has found such
activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Under the BHCA,
the FRB has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a non-bank subsidiary
(other than a non-bank subsidiary of a bank) upon the FRB’s determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk
to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.
In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt
corrective action rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III. The final rules generally implement higher minimum
capital requirements, add a new common equity tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be
considered common equity tier 1 capital, additional tier 1 capital or tier 2 capital. The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets
requirements are a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a tier 1 capital ratio
of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains
at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on
capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking
organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based
capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The new minimum capital requirements became
effective on January 1, 2015. The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period that began on January
1, 2016.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the FRB requires each bank holding company to comply with the leverage ratio,
under which the bank holding company must maintain a minimum level of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets of
4.0% (5.0% to be considered "well capitalized"). The Banks are subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the FDIC.
Dividends
Federal and state laws impose limitations on the payment of dividends by the Banks. The Pennsylvania Banking Code restricts
the availability of capital funds for payment of dividends by the Banks to their additional paid-in capital.
In addition to the dividend restrictions described above, the banking regulators have the authority to prohibit or to limit the payment
of dividends by the Banks if, in the banking regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound
practice in light of the financial condition of the Banks.
Under Pennsylvania law, the Company may not pay a dividend, if, after giving effect thereto, it would be unable to pay its debts
as they become due in the usual course of business and, after giving effect to the dividend, the total assets of the Company would
be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the Company were to be dissolved at the time
of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose rights are superior to those receiving the
dividend.
It is also the policy of the FRB that a bank holding company generally only pay dividends on common stock out of net income
available to common shareholders over the past twelve months and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears
consistent with a bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. In the current financial and
economic environment, the FRB has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has
discouraged dividend pay-out ratios at the 100% level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong. A bank holding
company also should not maintain a dividend level that places undue pressure on the capital of such institution’s subsidiaries, or
that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for such subsidiaries.
C. Regulation of the Banks
The Banks are highly regulated by the FDIC and the Department. The laws that such agencies enforce limit the specific types of
businesses in which the Banks may engage, and the products and services that the Banks may offer to customers. Generally, these
limitations are designed to protect the insurance fund of the FDIC and/or the customers of the Banks, and not the Banks or its
shareholders. From time to time, various types of new federal and state legislation have been proposed that could result in additional
regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of the Banks. It cannot be predicted whether any such legislation will be adopted
or how such legislation would affect business of the Banks. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking
activities in the United States, the Banks' business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal legislation and regulations
12 that may increase the costs of doing business. Some of the major regulatory provisions that affect the business of the Banks are
discussed briefly below.
Prompt Corrective Action
The FDIC has specified the levels at which an insured institution will be considered “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,”
“undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized.” In the event an institution’s capital deteriorates to the “undercapitalized”
category or below, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”) and FDIC regulations prescribe an increasing amount of
regulatory intervention, including: (1) the institution of a capital restoration plan by a bank and a guarantee of the plan by a parent
institution and liability for civil money damages for failure to fulfill its commitment on that guarantee; and (2) the placement of
a hold on increases in assets, number of branches, or lines of business. If capital has reached the significantly or critically
undercapitalized levels, further material restrictions can be imposed, including restrictions on interest payable on accounts,
dismissal of management and (in critically undercapitalized situations) appointment of a receiver. For well-capitalized institutions,
the FDIA provides authority for regulatory intervention where the institution is deemed to be engaging in unsafe or unsound
practices or receives a less than satisfactory examination report rating for asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity.
Deposit Insurance
The FDIC maintains the Deposit Insurance Fund ("DIF") by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium. The FDIC
has set the amount of deposits it insures to $250,000.
As mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the assessment base
that the FDIC uses to calculate assessment premiums is a bank’s average assets minus average tangible equity. The range of
assessment rates is a low of 2.5 basis points to a high of 45 basis points, per $100 of assets.
The FDIC is required under the Dodd-Frank Act to establish assessment rates that will allow the DIF to achieve a reserve ratio of
1.35% of insured deposits by September 2020. In addition, the FDIC has established a “designated reserve ratio” of 2.0%, a target
ratio that, until it is achieved, will not likely result in the FDIC reducing assessment rates. In attempting to achieve the mandated
1.35% ratio, the FDIC is required to implement assessment formulas that charge banks over $10 billion in asset size more than
banks under that size. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC is authorized to make reimbursements from the insurance fund to
banks if the reserve ratio exceeds 1.50%, but the FDIC has adopted the “designated reserve ratio” of 2.0% and has announced that
any reimbursements from the fund are indefinitely suspended.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Banks are a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (the “FHLB”), which is one of 12 regional Federal Home
Loan Banks. Each Federal Home Loan Bank serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. It is
funded primarily from funds deposited by member institutions and proceeds from the sale of consolidated obligations of the Federal
Home Loan Bank System. It makes loans to members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures established by
the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank. At December 31, 2016, the Banks had $85,625,000 in FHLB advances.
As a member, the Banks are required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB. The amount of required stock varies based on
the FHLB products utilitied by the Banks and the amount of the products utilized. At December 31, 2016, the Banks had $8,344,300
in stock of the FHLB which was in compliance with this requirement.
Other Legislation
The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted on July 21, 2010 and significantly changed the bank regulatory structure and affected the lending,
deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The federal agencies
are given significant discretion in drafting rules and regulations to implement the Dodd-Frank Act, and consequently, much of the
impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for some time.
Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have already impacted the Company. For example, effective July 21, 2011, a provision
of the Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have
interest bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an
adverse impact on the Company’s interest expense. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increased the maximum amount of
deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008.
13 Bank and thrift holding companies with assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, such as the Company, will be
permitted to include trust preferred securities that were issued before May 19, 2010, as Tier 1 capital; however, trust preferred
securities issued by a bank or thrift holding company (other than those with assets of less than $500 million) after May 19, 2010,
will no longer count as Tier 1 capital. Trust preferred securities still will be entitled to be treated as Tier 2 capital.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and
so-called “golden parachute” arrangements, and may allow greater access by shareholders to the company’s proxy material by
authorizing the SEC to promulgate rules that would allow shareholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy
materials. The legislation also directs the FRB to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding
company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.
The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer
protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer
protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive”
acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and
savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets such as
the Banks will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank
Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and
gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.
It is difficult to predict at this time the specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and
regulations will have on community banks. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-
Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such
requirements will have on financial institutions’ operations is presently unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act
may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, or otherwise adversely
affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and
make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted to enhance penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded
companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures under the federal securities
laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally applies to all companies, including the Company, that file or are required to file periodic
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. The
legislation includes provisions, among other things, governing the services that can be provided by a public company’s independent
auditors and the procedures for approving such services, requiring the chief executive officer and principal accounting officer to
certify certain matters relating to the company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act, requiring expedited filings of reports by
insiders of their securities transactions and containing other provisions relating to insider conflicts of interest, increasing disclosure
requirements relating to critical financial accounting policies and their application, increasing penalties for securities law violations,
and creating a new public accounting oversight board, a regulatory body subject to SEC jurisdiction with broad powers to set
auditing, quality control, and ethics standards for accounting firms. In response to the legislation, the national securities exchanges
and NASDAQ have adopted new rules relating to certain matters, including the independence of members of a company’s audit
committee as a condition to listing or continued listing.
Congress is often considering some financial industry legislation, and the federal banking agencies routinely propose new
regulations. The Company cannot predict how any new legislation, or new rules adopted by federal or state banking agencies,
may affect the business of the Company and its subsidiaries in the future. Given that the financial industry remains under stress
and severe scrutiny, and given that the U.S. economy has not yet fully recovered to pre-crisis levels of activity, the Company
expects that there will be significant legislation and regulatory actions that may materially affect the banking industry for the
foreseeable future.
Environmental Laws
Environmentally related hazards have become a source of high risk and potential liability for financial institutions relating to their
loans. Environmentally contaminated properties owned by an institution’s borrowers may result in a drastic reduction in the value
of the collateral securing the institution’s loans to such borrowers, high environmental clean up costs to the borrower affecting its
ability to repay the loans, the subordination of any lien in favor of the institution to a state or federal lien securing clean up costs,
and liability to the institution for clean up costs if it forecloses on the contaminated property or becomes involved in the management
of the borrower. The Company is not aware of any borrower who is currently subject to any environmental investigation or clean
up proceeding which is likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
14 Effect of Government Monetary Policies
The earnings of the Company are and will be affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of
the United States Government and its agencies. The monetary policies of the FRB have had, and will likely continue to have, an
important impact on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in order,
among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The FRB has a major effect upon the levels of bank loans, investments,
and deposits through its open market operations in the United States Government securities and through its regulation of, among
other things, the discount rate on borrowings by member banks and the reserve requirements against member bank deposits. It is
not possible to predict the nature and impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BANKS
History and Business
JSSB was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a state bank in 1934 and became a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company on July 12, 1983.
As of December 31, 2016, JSSB had total assets of $986,486,000; total shareholders’ equity of $84,020,000; and total deposits of
$770,937,000. JSSB's deposits are insured by the FDIC for the maximum amount provided under current law.
Luzerne was acquired by the Company on June 1, 2013. As of December 31, 2016, Luzerne had total assets of $387,695,000;
total shareholders’ equity of $45,401,000; and total deposits of $328,812,000. Luzerne's deposits are insured by the FDIC for the
maximum amount provided under current law.
The Banks engage in business as commercial banks, doing business at locations in Lycoming, Clinton, Centre, Montour, Union
and Luzerne Counties, Pennsylvania. The Banks offer insurance, securities brokerage services, annuity and mutual fund investment
products, and financial planning through the M Group.
Services offered by the Banks include accepting time, demand and savings deposits including Super NOW accounts, statement
savings accounts, money market accounts, and fixed rate certificates of deposit. Their services also include making secured and
unsecured business and consumer loans that include financing commercial transactions as well as construction and residential
mortgage loans and revolving credit loans with overdraft protection.
The Banks' loan portfolio mix can be classified into three principal categories. These are commercial and agricultural, real estate,
and consumer. Real estate loans can be further segmented into residential, commercial, and construction. Qualified borrowers
are defined by our loan policy and our underwriting standards. Owner provided equity requirements range from 0% to 35%,
depending on the collateral offered for the loan. Terms are generally restricted to 30 years or less with the exception of construction
and land development, which are generally limited to one and five years, respectively. Real estate appraisals, property construction
verifications, and site visitations comply with our loan policy and with industry regulatory standards.
Prospective residential mortgage customer’s repayment ability is determined from information contained in the application and
recent income tax returns, or other verified income sources. Emphasis is on credit, employment, income, and residency verification.
Broad hazard insurance is always required and flood insurance where applicable. In the case of construction mortgages, builders
risk insurance is requested.
Agricultural loans for the purchase or improvement of real estate must meet the Banks' real estate underwriting criteria. Agricultural
loans made for the purchase of equipment are usually payable in five years, but never more than ten, depending upon the useful
life of the purchased asset. Minimum borrower equity ranges from 0% to 35% depending on the purpose. Livestock financing
criteria depends upon the nature of the operation. Agricultural loans are also made for crop production purposes. Such loans are
structured to repay within the production cycle and not carried over into a subsequent year.
Commercial loans are made for the acquisition and improvement of real estate, purchase of equipment, and for working capital
purposes on a seasonal or revolving basis. General purpose working capital loans are also available with repayment expected
within one year. Equipment loans are generally amortized over three to ten years. Insurance coverage with the Banks as loss payee
is required, especially in the case where the equipment is rolling stock. It is also a general policy to collateralize non-real estate
loans with the asset purchased and, dependant upon loan terms, junior liens are filed on other available assets. Financial information
required on all commercial mortgages includes the most current three years balance sheets and income statements and projections
on income to be developed through the project. In the case of corporations and partnerships, the principals are often asked to
personally guaranty the entity’s debt.
15 Seasonal and revolving lines of credit are offered for working capital purposes. Collateral for such a loan may vary but often
includes the pledge of inventory and/or receivables. Drawing availability is usually 50% of inventory and 80% of eligible
receivables. Eligible receivables are defined as invoices less than 90 days delinquent. Exclusive reliance is very seldom placed
on such collateral; therefore, other lienable assets are also taken into the collateral pool. Where reliance is placed on inventory
and accounts receivable, the applicant must provide financial information including agings on a specified basis. In addition, the
guaranty of the principals is usually obtained.
Letter of credit availability is usually limited to standby or performance letters of credit where the customer is well known to the
Banks. The credit criteria is the same as that utilized in making a direct loan. Collateral is obtained in most cases.
Consumer loan products include residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines, automobile financing, personal loans and
lines of credit, overdraft and check lines. Our policy includes standards used in the industry on debt service ratios and terms are
consistent with prudent underwriting standards and the use of proceeds. Verifications are made of employment and residency,
along with credit history.
Second mortgages are confined to equity borrowing and home improvements. Terms are generally fifteen years or less. Loan to
collateral value criteria is 90% or less and verifications are made to determine values. Automobile financing is generally restricted
to five years and done on both an indirect and direct basis. The Banks, as a practice, do not floor plan and therefore do not discount
dealer paper. Small loan requests are to accommodate personal needs such as debt consolidation or the purchase of small appliances.
Overdraft check lines are usually limited to $5,000 or less.
The Banks' investment portfolios are analyzed and priced on a monthly basis. Investments are made in U.S. Treasuries, U.S.
Agency issues, bank qualified tax-exempt municipal bonds, taxable municipal bonds, corporate bonds, and corporate stocks which
consist of Pennsylvania bank stocks. Bonds with BBB or better ratings are used, unless a local issue is purchased that has a lesser
or no rating. Factors taken into consideration when investments are purchased include liquidity, the Company’s tax position, tax
equivalent yield, third party investment ratings, and the policies of the Asset/Liability Committee.
The banking environment in Lycoming, Clinton, Centre, Montour, Union and Luzerne Counties, Pennsylvania is highly
competitive. The Banks operate twenty-three full service offices in these markets and compete for loans and deposits with
numerous commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other financial institutions. The economic base of the region is
developed around small business, health care, educational facilities (college and public schools), light manufacturing industries,
and agriculture.
The Banks have a relatively stable deposit base and no material amount of deposits is obtained from a single depositor or group
of depositors, excluding public entities that account for approximately 15% of total deposits. Although the Banks have regular
opportunities to bid on pools of funds of $100,000 or more in the hands of municipalities, hospitals, and others, it does not rely
on these monies to fund loans or intermediate or longer-term investments.
The Banks have not experienced any significant seasonal fluctuations in the amount of deposits. The Banks have experienced an
outflow of deposits related to municipalities and school districts due to the ongoing Commonwealth of Pennsylvania budget impass.
Supervision and Regulation
As referenced elsewhere, the banking business is highly regulated, and the Banks are only able to engage in business activities,
and to provide products and services, that are permitted by applicable law and regulation. In addition, the earnings of the Banks
are affected by the policies of regulatory authorities including the FDIC and the FRB. An important function of the FRB is to
regulate the money supply and interest rates. Among the instruments used to implement these objectives are open market operations
in U.S. Government Securities, changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits, and limitations on interest rates
that member banks may pay on time and savings deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall
growth and distribution of bank loans, and their use may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits.
The policies and regulations of the FRB have had and will probably continue to have a significant effect on the Banks' deposits,
loans and investment growth, as well as the rate of interest earned and paid, and are expected to affect the Banks' operation in the
future. The effect of such policies and regulations upon the future business and earnings of the Banks cannot accurately be predicted.
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
The following sets forth several risk factors that may affect the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
16 Changes in interest rates could reduce our income, cash flows and asset values.
Our income and cash flows and the value of our assets depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates we
earn on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities
such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors which are beyond our control, including general
economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence not only the interest
we receive on our loans and investment securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings but will also
affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits and the value of our investment portfolio. If the rate of interest we pay on
our deposits and other borrowings increases more than the rate of interest we earn on our loans and other investments, our net
interest income, and therefore our earnings, could be adversely affected. Our earnings also could be adversely affected if the rates
on our loans and other investments fall more quickly than those on our deposits and other borrowings.
Economic conditions either nationally or locally in areas in which our operations are concentrated may adversely affect
our business.
Deterioration in local, regional, national, or global economic conditions could cause us to experience a reduction in deposits and
new loans, an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans, and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing
their loans, all of which could adversely affect our performance and financial condition. Unlike larger banks that are more
geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services locally. Therefore, we are particularly vulnerable to adverse
local economic conditions.
Our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient
to absorb actual losses or if we are required to increase our allowance.
Despite our underwriting criteria, we may experience loan delinquencies and losses. In order to absorb losses associated with
nonperforming loans, we maintain an allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation
of economic conditions, and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Determination of the allowance inherently
involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of
which may undergo material changes. At any time there are likely to be loans in our portfolio that will result in losses but that
have not been identified as nonperforming or potential problem credits. We cannot be sure that we will be able to identify
deteriorating credits before they become nonperforming assets or that we will be able to limit losses on those loans that are
identified. We may be required to increase our allowance for loan losses for any of several reasons. Federal regulators, in reviewing
our loan portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may request that we increase our allowance for loan losses. Changes in
economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans
and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in our allowance. In addition, if charge-offs in
future periods exceed our allowance for loan losses, we will need additional increases in our allowance for loan losses. Any
increases in our allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in our net income and, possibly, our capital, and may materially
affect our results of operations in the period in which the allowance is increased.
Many of our loans are secured, in whole or in part, with real estate collateral which is subject to declines in value.
In addition to considering the financial strength and cash flow characteristics of a borrower, we often secure our loans with real
estate collateral. Real estate values and the real estate market are generally affected by, among other things, changes in local,
regional or national economic conditions, fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential purchasers, changes
in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies, and acts of nature. The real estate collateral provides an
alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower. If real estate prices in our markets decline, the value of the
real estate collateral securing our loans could be reduced. If we are required to liquidate real estate collateral securing loans during
a period of reduced real estate values to satisfy the debt, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected.
Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption or breach in
security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer-relationship management, general ledger, deposit,
loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption
or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches
will not occur; or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security
breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional
17 regulatory scrutiny or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability; any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations.
We face the risk of cyber-attack to our computer systems.
Our computer systems, software and networks have been and will continue to be vulnerable to unauthorized access, loss or
destruction of data (including confidential client information), account takeovers, unavailability of service, computer viruses or
other malicious code, cyber-attacks and other events. These threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of
employees or third parties, or may result from accidental technological failure. If one or more of these events occurs, it could
result in the disclosure of confidential client information, damage to our reputation with our clients and the market, additional
costs to us (such as repairing systems or adding new personnel or protection technologies), regulatory penalties and financial
losses, to both us and our clients and customers. Such events could also cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations (such
as the lack of availability of our online banking system), as well as the operations of our clients, customers or other third parties.
Although we maintain safeguards to protect against these risks, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses in the
future that may be material in amount.
Competition may decrease our growth or profits.
We face substantial competition in all phases of our operations from a variety of different competitors, including commercial
banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, factoring companies,
leasing companies, insurance companies, and money market mutual funds. There is very strong competition among financial
services providers in our principal service area. Our competitors may have greater resources, higher lending limits, or larger
branch systems than we do. Accordingly, they may be able to offer a broader range of products and services as well as better
pricing for those products and services than we can.
In addition, some of the financial services organizations with which we compete are not subject to the same degree of regulation
as is imposed on federally insured financial institutions. As a result, those non-bank competitors may be able to access funding
and provide various services more easily or at less cost than we can, adversely affecting our ability to compete effectively.
The value of certain investment securities is volatile and future declines or other-than-temporary impairments could
materially adversely affect our future earnings and regulatory capital.
Continued volatility in the market value for certain of our investment securities, whether caused by changes in market perceptions
of credit risk, as reflected in the expected market yield of the security, or actual defaults in the portfolio could result in significant
fluctuations in the value of the securities. This could have a material adverse impact on our accumulated other comprehensive
income/loss and shareholders’ equity depending on the direction of the fluctuations. Furthermore, future downgrades or defaults
in these securities could result in future classifications of investment securities as other than temporarily impaired. This could
have a material impact on our future earnings.
We may be adversely affected by government regulation.
The banking industry is heavily regulated. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect the federal deposit insurance
funds and depositors, not shareholders. Changes in the laws, regulations, and regulatory practices affecting the banking industry
may increase our costs of doing business or otherwise adversely affect us and create competitive advantages for others. Regulations
affecting banks and financial services companies undergo continuous change, and we cannot predict the ultimate effect of these
changes, which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability or financial condition.
In response to the financial crisis that commenced in 2008, Congress has taken actions that are intended to strengthen confidence
and encourage liquidity in financial institutions, and the FDIC has taken actions to increase insurance coverage on deposit
accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of a consumer protection division at the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System that will have broad authority to issue regulations governing the services and products we provide consumers. This
additional regulation could increase our compliance costs and otherwise adversely impact our operations. That legislation also
contains provisions that, over time, could result in higher regulatory capital requirements (including through the implementation
of the capital standards of Basel III) and loan loss provisions for the Banks, and may increase interest expense due to the ability
granted in July 2011 to pay interest on all demand deposits. In addition, there have been proposals made by members of Congress
and others that would reduce the amount delinquent borrowers are otherwise contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage
loans and limit an institution’s ability to foreclose on mortgage collateral. These proposals could result in credit losses or increased
expense in pursuing our remedies as a creditor. Recent regulatory changes impose limits on our ability to charge overdraft fees,
which may decrease our non-interest income as compared to more recent prior periods.
18 The potential exists for additional federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in policy, affecting many aspects of our
operations, including capital levels, lending and funding practices, and liquidity standards. New laws and regulations may increase
our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and otherwise affect our operations, and may significantly affect the
markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, the fees we can charge and our ongoing
operations, costs and profitability.
We rely on our management and other key personnel, and the loss of any of them may adversely affect our operations.
We are and will continue to be dependent upon the services of our executive management team. In addition, we will continue to
depend on our ability to retain and recruit key commercial loan officers. The unexpected loss of services of any key management
personnel or commercial loan officers could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition because of their skills,
knowledge of our market, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Environmental liability associated with lending activities could result in losses.
In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing our loans. If hazardous substances were
discovered on any of these properties, we could be liable to governmental entities or third parties for the costs of remediation of
the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws can impose liability regardless of
whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic
substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site even if we
neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially
limit use of properties we acquire through foreclosure, reduce their value or limit our ability to sell them in the event of a default
on the loans they secure. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing
laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability.
Failure to implement new technologies in our operations may adversely affect our growth or profits.
The market for financial services, including banking services and consumer finance services is increasingly affected by advances
in technology, including developments in telecommunications, data processing, computers, automation, Internet-based banking,
and telebanking. Our ability to compete successfully in our markets may depend on the extent to which we are able to exploit such
technological changes. However, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to properly or timely anticipate or implement
such technologies or properly train our staff to use such technologies. Any failure to adapt to new technologies could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, or operating results.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.
Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund,
or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is subject to the same market forces that affect the price
of common stock in any company.
ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2
PROPERTIES
The Company owns and leases its properties. Listed herewith are the locations of properties owned or leased as of December 31,
2016, in which the banking offices are located; all properties are in good condition and adequate for the Company's purposes:
19 Main Street
Bridge Street
DuBoistown
Williamsport
Montgomery
Lock Haven
Mill Hall
Spring Mills
Centre Hall
Zion
State College
Jersey Shore State Bank & Subsidiaries
Office
Address
Ownership
115 South Main Street, PO Box 5098
Owned
Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania 17740
112 Bridge Street
Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania 17740
2675 Euclid Avenue
Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17702
300 Market Street
P.O. Box 967
Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17703-0967
9094 Rt. 405 Highway
Montgomery, Pennsylvania 17752
4 West Main Street
Lock Haven, Pennsylvania 17745
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
(Inside Wal-Mart), 173 Hogan Boulevard
Under Lease
Mill Hall, Pennsylvania 17751
3635 Penns Valley Road, P.O. Box 66
Under Lease
Spring Mills, Pennsylvania 16875
2842 Earlystown Road
Centre Hall, Pennsylvania 16828
100 Cobblestone Road
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania 16823
2050 North Atherton Street
State College, Pennsylvania 16803
Montoursville
820 Broad Street
Danville
Loyalsock
Lewisburg
Montoursville, Pennsylvania 17754
606 Continental Boulevard
Danville, Pennsylvania 17821
1720 East Third Street
Williamsport, PA 17701
550 North Derr Drive
Lewisburg, PA 17837
The M Group, Inc.
705 Washington Boulevard
Under Lease
D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17701
Land Under Lease
Under Lease
Land Under Lease
Under Lease
Under Lease
Owned
Land Under Lease
20 Office
Luzerne Bank
Address
Ownership
Dallas
Lake
Hazle Twp.
Luzerne
Plains
509 Main Road
Memorial Highway
Dallas, PA 18612
Corners of Rt. 118 & 415
Dallas, PA 18612
10 Dessen Drive
Hazle Twp., PA 18202
118 Main Street
Luzerne, PA 18709
1077 Hwy. 315
Wilkes Barre, PA 18702
Swoyersville
801 Main Street
Swoyersville, PA 18704
Wilkes-Barre
67 Public Square
Wyoming
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701
324 Wyoming Ave.
Wyoming, PA 18644
ITEM 3
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Under Lease
Owned
Under Lease
Owned
The Company is subject to lawsuits and claims arising out of its business in the ordinary course. In the opinion of management,
after review and consultation with counsel, there are no legal proceedings currently pending or threatened that are reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS,
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PWOD”. The following table
sets forth (1) the quarterly high and low closing sale prices for a share of the Company’s Common Stock during the periods
indicated, and (2) quarterly dividends on a share of the common stock with respect to each quarter since January 1, 2014.
21 Price Range
High
Low
Dividends
Declared
2016
First quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41.32
$
36.73
$
44.70
44.75
52.03
37.82
40.34
41.00
2015
First quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48.91
$
44.41
$
48.28
44.56
45.28
41.84
40.41
40.47
2014
First quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50.95
$
43.19
$
48.37
48.79
49.26
43.21
42.25
42.18
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
The Company has paid dividends since the effective date of its formation as a bank holding company. It is the present intention
of the Company’s board of directors to continue the dividend payment policy; however, further dividends must necessarily depend
upon earnings, financial condition, appropriate legal restrictions, and other factors relevant at the time the board of directors of
the Company considers dividend policy. Cash available for dividend distributions to shareholders of the Company primarily comes
from dividends paid by Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank to the Company. Therefore, the restrictions on the Banks'
dividend payments are directly applicable to the Company. See also the information appearing in Note 20 to “Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements” for additional information related to dividend restrictions.
Under the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988 a corporation may not pay a dividend, if after giving effect thereto,
the corporation would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business and after giving effect thereto
the total assets of the corporation would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the
corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of the shareholders
whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the dividend.
As of March 1, 2017, the Company had approximately 1,317 shareholders of record.
Following is a schedule of the shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the Company during the fourth quarter of
2016.
Period
Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Units)
Purchased
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (October 1 - October 31, 2016) . . . . . . . . . .
Month #2 (November 1 - November 30, 2016) . . . . . .
Month #3 (December 1 - December 31, 2016). . . . . . .
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
390,144
390,144
390,144
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly dollar changes in the cumulative shareholder return on the Company’s common
stock against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index, NASDAQ Bank Index, NASDAQ Composite, Russell 2000,
and SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ for the period of five fiscal years assuming the investment of $100.00 on December 31, 2011 and
assuming the reinvestment of dividends. The shareholder return shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future
performance.
22 Period Ending
Index
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NASDAQ Composite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NASDAQ Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Russell 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
101.28
116.00
117.45
118.69
116.35
119.19
144.89
153.57
164.57
168.21
161.52
171.31
145.77
174.60
188.84
176.48
169.43
177.42
131.18
177.01
201.98
192.08
161.95
191.53
162.89
198.18
219.89
265.02
196.45
265.56
23 ITEM 6
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2016:
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data Amounts)
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheet at End of Period:
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Per Share Data:
Earnings per share - basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings per share - diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Book value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of shares outstanding, at end of period . . .
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -
basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Ratios:
Return on average shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . .
Return on average total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend payout ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average shareholders’ equity to average total
assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans to deposits, at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
46,813
$
46,124
$
45,606
$
43,299
$
37,107
5,567
41,246
1,196
40,050
12,113
35,091
17,072
4,597
5,219
40,905
2,300
38,605
12,765
33,736
17,634
3,736
4,962
40,644
2,850
37,794
14,508
33,890
18,412
3,804
5,264
38,035
2,275
35,760
12,042
30,267
17,535
3,451
6,211
30,896
2,525
28,371
10,100
22,023
16,448
2,598
$
12,475
$
13,898
$
14,608
$
14,084
$
13,850
$ 1,348,590
$ 1,320,057
$ 1,245,011
$1,211,995
$ 856,535
1,093,681
(12,896)
1,095,214
85,998
138,249
1,045,207
(12,044)
1,031,880
91,025
136,279
915,579
(10,579)
981,419
71,176
135,967
818,344
(10,144)
973,002
71,202
127,815
512,232
(7,617)
642,026
76,278
93,726
$
$
2.64
2.64
1.88
29.20
$
2.91
2.91
1.88
28.71
$
3.03
3.03
1.88
28.30
$
3.19
3.19
2.13
26.52
3.61
3.61
1.88
24.42
4,734,657
4,747,132
4,804,815
4,819,333
3,838,516
4,735,457
4,772,239
4,816,149
4,410,626
3,837,751
8.96%
0.93%
3.44%
71.37%
10.38%
99.86%
10.11%
1.08%
3.61%
64.52%
10.68%
101.29%
10.79%
1.19%
3.81%
61.99%
11.05%
93.29%
12.36%
1.32%
4.13%
67.88%
10.70%
84.11%
15.36%
1.70%
4.45%
52.08%
11.04%
79.78%
24 ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
NET INTEREST INCOME
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net interest income is determined by calculating the difference between the yields earned on interest-earning assets and the rates
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. To compare the tax-exempt asset yields to taxable yields, amounts are adjusted to taxable
equivalents based on the marginal corporate federal tax rate of 34%. The tax equivalent adjustments to net interest income for
2016, 2015, and 2014 were $1,402,000, $2,011,000, and $2,219,000, respectively.
2016 vs. 2015
Reported net interest income increased $341,000 to $41,246,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2015, as the growth in the earning asset portfolio offset the impact of the yield on earning assets decreasing
to 3.88% from 4.04%. Total interest income increased $689,000 as the impact of growth in the average balance of the loan portfolio
was limited by a decline in the average balance of the investment portfolio as the portfolio is actively managed to reduce interest
rate and market risk. Interest income on a tax equivalent basis recognized on the loan portfolio increased $2,981,000 due to a
$81,592,000 increase in the average balance in the loan portfolio. Interest and dividend income generated from the investment
portfolio on a tax equivalent basis decreased $3,076,000 due to a $61,820,000 decrease in the average balance in the investment
portfolio and a 40 basis point ("bp") reduction in the average rate. The decrease in the portfolio was driven by a strategic plan
that started in 2014 to sell off long-term municipal bonds with a maturity date greater than 10 years and securities with a call date
within the next five years, in order to reduce interest rate risk and market risk.
Interest expense increased $348,000 to $5,567,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in
interest expense was driven by growth in total deposits and borrowings that funded the earning asset portfolio growth. The impact
of the growth in interest-bearing liabilities was limited by minimal increase of 2 bp in cost of funds. The average rate paid on
time deposits increased 16 bp as the time deposit portfolio was lengthened in preparation for a rising rate environment.
2015 vs. 2014
Reported net interest income increased $261,000 to $40,905,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2014, as the yield on earning assets decreased to 4.04% from 4.25% offsetting the growth in the earning asset
portfolio. On a tax equivalent basis, the change in net interest income was an increase of $53,000 to $42,916,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Total interest income increased $518,000 as the impact
of growth in the average balance of the loan portfolio was limited by a decline in the average balance of the investment portfolio
as the portfolio is actively managed to reduce interest rate and market risk. Interest income growth was also limited by the portfolio
yields caused by the prolonged low interest rate cycle enacted by the Federal Open Markets Committee (“FOMC”). Interest
income on a tax equivalent basis recognized on the loan portfolio increased $2,770,000 due to a $117,317,000 increase in the
average balance in the loan portfolio which was partially offset by interest rates repricing downward . Interest and dividend income
generated from the investment portfolio on a tax equivalent basis decreased $2,440,000 due to a $46,232,000 decrease in the
average balance in the investment portfolio and a 23 basis point ("bp") reduction in the average rate. The decrease in the portfolio
was driven by a strategic plan that started in 2014 to sell off long-term municipal bonds with a maturity date of 2025 or later and
securities with a call date within the next five years, in order to reduce interest rate risk and market risk.
Interest expense increased $257,000 to $5,219,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 2014. The increase in
interest expense was driven by growth in total deposits and borrowings that funded the earning asset portfolio growth. The impact
of the growth in interest-bearing liabilities was limited by minimal increase of 1 bp in cost of funds. The average rate paid on
time deposits increased 13 bp as efforts were undertaken to lengthen the time deposit portfolio in preparation for a rising rate
environment.
25 AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
The following tables set forth certain information relating to the Company’s average balance sheet and reflect the average yield
on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated and the average yields earned and rates paid. Such yields and
costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.
(In Thousands)
Assets:
2016
2015
2014
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Average
Rate
Tax-exempt loans . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
47,782
$ 1,852
3.87% $
43,395
$ 1,679
3.87% $
29,461
$ 1,295
All other loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,009,384
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,057,166
40,834
42,686
4.05%
4.04%
932,179
975,574
38,026
39,705
4.08%
4.07%
828,796
858,257
35,640
36,935
4.40%
4.30%
4.30%
Fed funds sold. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—%
—
—
—%
170
—
—%
Taxable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt securities. . . . . . . . . .
94,887
53,638
Total securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
148,525
3,072
2,270
5,342
3.24%
4.23%
3.60%
127,052
83,293
210,345
4,183
4,235
8,418
3.29%
5.08%
4.00%
161,889
94,688
5,626
5,232
256,577
10,858
3.48%
5.53%
4.23%
Interest-bearing deposits. . . . . . . .
36,592
187
0.51%
4,238
12
0.28%
9,318
32
0.34%
Total interest-earning assets . . . . .
1,242,283
48,215
3.88% 1,190,157
48,135
4.04% 1,124,322
47,825
4.25%
Other assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
99,500
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,341,783
Liabilities and shareholders’
equity:
Savings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 151,397
Super Now deposits . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits. . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing deposits . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . .
187,106
238,175
221,498
798,176
18,518
90,554
Total borrowings. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
109,072
97,103
$ 1,287,260
100,983
$ 1,225,305
58
458
648
2,383
3,547
46
1,974
2,020
0.04% $ 143,055
0.24%
0.27%
1.08%
0.44%
0.25%
2.14%
1.82%
187,396
207,252
220,360
758,063
38,909
84,721
123,630
56
491
554
2,028
3,129
116
1,974
2,090
0.04% $ 140,575
0.26%
0.27%
0.92%
0.41%
0.30%
2.30%
1.67%
182,229
210,066
223,537
756,407
22,342
71,195
93,537
81
583
561
1,770
2,995
54
1,913
1,967
0.06%
0.32%
0.27%
0.79%
0.40%
0.24%
2.65%
2.07%
Total interest-bearing liabilities . .
907,248
5,567
0.61%
881,693
5,219
0.59%
849,944
4,962
0.58%
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity. . . . . . . . . . .
279,130
16,152
139,253
Total liabilities and shareholders’
equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,341,783
Interest rate spread . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income/margin . . . . .
$42,648
251,029
17,047
137,491
225,981
13,933
135,447
$ 1,287,260
$ 1,225,305
3.27%
3.44%
$42,916
3.45%
3.61%
$42,863
3.67%
3.81%
·
·
·
·
Fees on loans are included with interest on loans as follows: 2016 - $873,000; 2015 - $422,000; 2014 - $487,000.
Information in this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.
Nonaccrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.
Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income
from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate.
26 Reconciliation of Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income
(In Thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Total interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax equivalent adjustment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
46,813
$
46,124
$
5,567
41,246
1,402
5,219
40,905
2,011
42,648
$
42,916
$
45,606
4,962
40,644
2,219
42,863
Rate/Volume Analysis
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in our interest income and interest expense for the periods
indicated. For interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes
in volume (changes in average volume multiplied by old rate) and (ii) changes in rates (changes in rate multiplied by old average
volume). Increases and decreases due to both interest rate and volume, which cannot be separated, have been allocated proportionally
to the change due to volume and the change due to interest rate. Income and interest rates are on a taxable equivalent basis.
(In Thousands)
Volume
Rate
Net
Volume
Rate
Net
Year Ended December 31,
2016 vs. 2015
2015 vs. 2014
Increase (Decrease) Due To
Increase (Decrease) Due To
Interest income:
Loans, tax-exempt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxable investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-earning assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense:
Savings deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Super Now deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money market deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
2016 vs 2015
$
173
$
— $
173
$
555
$
(171) $
384
3,093
(1,048)
(1,338)
91
971
4
(1)
90
11
(52)
133
185
786
$
(285)
(63)
(627)
84
(891)
(2)
(32)
4
344
(18)
(133)
163
(1,054) $
$
2,808
(1,111)
(1,965)
175
80
4,278
(1,151)
(595)
(22)
3,065
(1,892)
(292)
(402)
3
(2,754)
2,386
(1,443)
(997)
(19)
311
2
(33)
94
355
(70)
—
348
(268) $
—
17
(7)
(27)
47
330
360
(2)
(109)
—
285
15
(269)
(80)
2,705
$ (2,674) $
(2)
(92)
(7)
258
62
61
280
31
The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to
assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and
recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed
annually for the Company. Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.
The allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance
has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in
mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers industry standards
and trends with respect to nonperforming loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.
27 Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for
loan losses is adequate at December 31, 2016, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy or employment
and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets and charge-
offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in interest income. Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process,
bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Banks' loan loss allowance adequacy. The banking regulators could require the
recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their
examination.
While determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio
segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.
The allowance for loan losses increased from $12,044,000 at December 31, 2015 to $12,896,000 at December 31, 2016. At
December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was 1.18% of total loans compared to 1.15% of total loans at December 31,
2015.
The provision for loan losses totaled $1,196,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $2,300,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2015. The decrease in the provision was appropriate when considering the gross loan growth and low level of net
charge-offs during 2016. Net charge-offs of $344,000 represented 0.03% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2016
compared to net charge-offs of $835,000 or 0.09% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2015. The growth in the
loan portfolio was driven by home equity product growth which historically is a lower risk product than commercial loans and
requires a lower allowance for loan losses. While nonperforming loans increased, the majority of the nonperforming loans are
centered on several loans that are either in a secured position and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position and/or
a specific allowance within the allowance for loan losses. Internal loan review and analysis, coupled with the ratios noted previously,
dictated a decrease in the provision for loan losses. Utilizing both internal and external resources, as noted, senior management
has concluded that the allowance for loan losses remains at a level adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio.
2015 vs 2014
The allowance for loan losses increased from $10,579,000 at December 31, 2014 to $12,044,000 at December 31, 2015. At
December 31, 2015, the allowance for loan losses was 1.15% of total loans compared to 1.16% of total loans at December 31,
2014.
The provision for loan losses totaled $2,300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $2,850,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2014. The decrease in the provision was appropriate when considering the gross loan growth offset by the $2,802,000
or 22.88% decrease in non-performing loans and level of net charge-offs. Net charge-offs of $835,000 represented 0.09% of
average loans for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net charge-offs of $2,451,000 or 0.28% of average loans for
the year ended December 31, 2014. The growth in the loan portfolio was driven by home equity product growth which historically
is a lower risk product than commercial loans and requires a lower allowance for loan losses. The decrease in nonperforming
loans is primarily the result of the payoff of a large commercial real estate loan and the resolution of several smaller commercial
real estate loans. The majority of the nonperforming loans are centered on several loans that are either in a secured position and
have sureties with a strong underlying financial position and/or a specific allowance within the allowance for loan losses. Internal
loan review and analysis, coupled with the ratios noted previously, dictated a decrease in the provision for loan losses. Utilizing
both internal and external resources, as noted, senior management has concluded that the allowance for loan losses remains at a
level adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
2016 vs. 2015
Total non-interest income decreased $652,000 from the year ended December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. Excluding net
security gains, non-interest income increased $249,000 year over year. Service charges decreased due to decreased level of
overdraft income. Bank owned life insurance income decreased due to decrease in the earnings rate. Insurance commissions and
brokerage commissions increased in part due to the book of business that was purchased in 2016. Gain on sale of loans increased
due to a shift product mix that began in the latter part of 2015 and the addition of mortgage loan originators. The decrease in other
income was primarily from an increased level of debit card income.
28 2016
2015
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities gains, available for sale. . . . . . . . . .
Net securities gains (losses), trading . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank owned life insurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,249
18.57% $
2,383
18.67% $
1,611
58
684
2,102
795
1,098
3,516
13.30
0.48
5.65
17.35
6.56
9.06
29.03
2,592
(22)
720
1,743
781
1,064
3,504
20.31
(0.17)
5.64
13.65
6.12
8.34
27.44
$ 12,113
100.00% $ 12,765
100.00% $
(134)
(981)
80
(36)
359
14
34
12
(652)
(5.62)%
(37.85)
363.64
(5.00)
20.60
1.79
3.20
0.34
(5.11)%
2015 vs. 2014
Total non-interest income decreased $1,743,000 from the year ended December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Excluding net
security gains, non-interest income decreased $798,000 year over year. Service charges decreased slightly due to decreased level
of overdraft income. Bank owned life insurance income decreased as a gain on death benefit was recognized in 2014. Insurance
commissions and brokerage commissions decreased due to a shift in product mix and a decreased level of commissions received
on each sale. Gain on sale of loans decreased due to product mix. The decrease in other income was primarily from a decreased
level of debit card income.
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
2015
2014
Change
Service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities gains, available for sale. . . . . . . . . .
Net securities losses, trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank owned life insurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,383
18.67% $
2,419
2,592
(22)
720
1,743
781
1,064
3,504
20.31
(0.17)
5.64
13.65
6.12
8.34
27.44
3,515
—
923
1,803
1,146
1,077
3,625
$ 12,765
100.00% $ 14,508
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
2016 vs. 2015
—
6.36
24.23
16.67% $
(36)
(923)
(22)
(203)
(60)
(365)
(13)
(121)
100.00% $ (1,743)
24.99
12.43
7.42
7.90
(1.49)%
(26.26)
N/A
(21.99)
(3.33)
(31.85)
(1.21)
(3.34)
(12.01)%
Total non-interest expenses increased $1,355,000 from the year ended December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. The increase
in salaries and employee benefits was attributable to increased health insurance expense and annual wage increases. Furniture
and equipment expenses increased due to the continued enhancement of systems. Amortization of investment in limited partnerships
decreased as two investments were fully amortized during 2016. The increase in marketing expense was primarily related to the
home equity and time deposit campaigns conducted during 2016. Other expenses were impacted by a mass replacement of debit
cards to implement EMV card technology to better protect the security of our customers. In addition, expenses increased due to
a data breach at a national restaurant chain that impacted our customer base.
29 (In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
2016
2015
Change
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsylvania shares tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of investment in limited
partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FDIC deposit insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 17,813
50.76% $ 17,023
50.46% $
2,223
2,793
873
312
767
740
366
6.33
7.96
2.49
0.89
2.19
2.11
1.04
2,248
2,622
954
661
867
612
311
6.66
7.77
2.83
1.96
2.57
1.81
0.92
9,204
26.23
8,438
25.02
790
(25)
171
(81)
(349)
(100)
128
55
766
4.64%
(1.11)
6.52
(8.49)
(52.80)
(11.53)
20.92
17.68
9.08
Total non-interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 35,091
100.00% $ 33,736
100.00% $
1,355
4.02%
2015 vs. 2014
Total non-interest expenses decreased $154,000 from the year ended December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015. The decrease in
salaries and employee benefits was attributable to the defined benefit pension plan ceasing to accrue additional benefits as of
December 31, 2014. Furniture and equipment expenses increased due to the full year impact of significant upgrades to the core
operating system, a new teller system, and various enhancements to other ancillary systems that were undertaken during 2014.
Other expenses decreased as the acquisition of Luzerne Bank is allowing for greater purchasing power as various contracts are
renewed.
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
2015
2014
Change
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsylvania shares tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of investment in limited
partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FDIC deposit insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 17,023
50.46% $ 17,273
50.97% $
2,248
2,622
954
661
867
612
311
6.66
7.77
2.83
1.96
2.57
1.81
0.92
2,301
2,536
907
661
746
532
345
6.79
7.48
2.68
1.95
2.20
1.57
1.02
8,438
25.02
8,589
25.34
(250)
(53)
86
47
—
121
80
(34)
(151)
(1.45)%
(2.30)
3.39
5.18
—
16.22
15.04
—
(1.76)
Total non-interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 33,736
100.00% $ 33,890
100.00% $
(154)
(0.45)%
INCOME TAXES
2016 vs. 2015
The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 resulted in an effective income tax rate of 26.93% compared
to 21.19% for 2015. This increase is primarily the result of decreased tax-exempt investment income and bank-owned life insurance
income which has resulted in a greater percentage of the pre-tax income being taxable.
The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position. Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined
that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.
30 2015 vs. 2014
The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015 resulted in an effective income tax rate of 21.19% compared
to 20.66% for 2014. This increase is primarily the result of decreased tax-exempt investment income and bank-owned life insurance
income which has resulted in a greater percentage of the pre-tax income being taxable.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
INVESTMENTS
2016
The fair value of the investment portfolio decreased $42,680,000 from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. The decrease
in value is the result of the investment portfolio being actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. This
process began in 2014 and is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long term municipal bonds that have a maturity date
greater than ten years and securities with a call date within the next five years. In addition, the decrease in corporate bond holdings
is being undertaken to reduce risk and also in response to the changes in bank regulatory capital calculations per Basel III. The
proceeds of the bond sales are primarily being deployed into loans. The strategy to sell a portion of the long-term bond portfolio
does negatively impact current earnings, but this action plays a key role in our long-term asset/liability management strategy as
the balance sheet is shortened to better prepare for a rising rate environment. The unrealized losses within the debt securities
portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 88% of the debt securities portfolio on an
amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.
2015
The fair value of the investment portfolio decreased $55,983,000 from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015. The decrease
in value is the result of the investment portfolio being actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. This
process began in 2014 and is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long term municipal bonds that have a maturity date
of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years. In addition, the decrease in corporate bond holdings is
being undertaken to reduce risk and also in response to the changes in bank regulatory capital calculations per Basel III. The
proceeds of the bond sales are primarily being deployed into loans. The strategy to sell a portion of the long-term bond portfolio
does negatively impact current earnings, but this action plays a key role in our long-term asset/liability management strategy as
the balance sheet is shortened to better prepare for a rising rate environment. The unrealized losses within the debt securities
portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 90% of the debt securities portfolio on an
amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.
31 The carrying amounts of investment securities are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Balance
% Portfolio
Balance
% Portfolio
Balance
% Portfolio
U.S. Government agency securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
—
—% $
3,549
2.01%
3,841
1.65%
Mortgage-backed securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,313
6.97
10,009
5.68
12,697
5.47
Asset-backed securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
109
0.08
1,940
1.10
2,492
1.07
State and political securities (tax-exempt):
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45,506
34.08
73,110
41.49
89,024
38.34
State and political securities (taxable):
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,428
11.55
13,445
7.63
19,092
8.22
Other bonds, notes and debentures:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total bonds, notes and debentures. . . . . .
51,118
121,474
38.28
90.96
57,772
159,825
32.78
90.69
89,463
216,609
38.53
93.28
Financial institution equity securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,535
7.89
11,483
6.52
9,915
4.27
Other equity securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,483
58
12,076
1.11
0.04
9.04
4,849
73
16,405
2.75
0.04
9.31
5,689
—
15,604
2.45
—
6.72
$ 133,550
100.00% $ 176,230
100.00% $ 232,213
100.00%
32 The following table shows the maturities and repricing of investment securities, at amortized cost and the weighted average yields
(for tax-exempt obligations on a fully taxable basis assuming a 34% tax rate) at December 31, 2016:
(In Thousands)
U.S. Government agency securities:
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities:
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities:
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities (tax-exempt):
Three
Months or
Less
Over Three
Months
Through
One Year
Over One
Year
Through
Five Years
Over Five
Years
Through
Ten Years
Over Ten
Years
Amortized
Cost Total
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
—%
—%
—%
—%
—%
—
—%
—
—%
—
—%
—
—%
6,028
2.33%
109
1.16%
—
—%
—
—%
—
—%
3,267
9,295
3.45%
2.72%
—
—%
109
1.16%
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,596
8,000
18,435
17,113
4.18%
3.65%
2.30%
2.30%
418
2.40%
45,562
2.60%
State and political securities (taxable):
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other bonds, notes, and debentures:
AFS Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Yield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity Securities
AFS Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Investment Portfolio Value . . . . . . . . . .
Total Investment Portfolio Yield. . . . . . . . . . .
—
—%
346
3.75%
—
—%
—
—%
6,915
8,300
4.46%
3.54%
21,836
30,864
3.01%
2.61%
—
—%
—
—%
15,215
3.96%
53,046
2.78%
$
1,942
$
8,109
$ 53,214
$ 56,277
$
3,685
123,227
4.10%
3.61%
2.88%
2.65%
3.33%
2.86%
11,233
56
$ 134,516
2.62%
All yields represent weighted average yields expressed on a tax equivalent basis. They are calculated on the basis of the cost,
adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, and effective yields weighted for the scheduled maturity of each
security. The taxable equivalent adjustment represents the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and
the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate (derived by dividing tax-exempt interest by 66%).
33 The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and estimated fair value for the debt security portfolio at December 31, 2016
follows:
A- to AAA
B- to BBB+
C to CCC+
Not Rated
Total
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
— $
— $
— $ — $
— $ — $
— $ — $
— $
—
9,295
109
59,252
39,643
9,313
109
59,406
38,472
—
—
—
—
—
—
13,403
12,646
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,525
1,528
—
—
9,295
109
60,777
53,046
9,313
109
60,934
51,118
$ 108,299
$ 107,300
$ 13,403
$ 12,646
$
— $ — $
1,525
$ 1,528
$ 123,227
$ 121,474
(In Thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. Government and
agency securities. . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities .
Asset-backed securities . . . .
State and political securities .
Other debt securities . . . . . . .
Total debt securities . . . . . . .
LOAN PORTFOLIO
2016
Gross loans of $1,093,681,000 at December 31, 2016 represented an increase of $48,474,000 from December 31, 2015. The
continued emphasis on well collateralized real estate loans was the primary driver of the overall increase in loans outstanding,
with home equity loans and lines of credit leading the way. The emphasis to add home equity lines of credit is part of the overall
strategy to shorten the duration of the earning asset portfolio in preparation of a rising interest rate environment. Indirect auto
lending was introduced during the latter portion of 2016 and contributed to the increase in installment loans to individuals.
2015
Gross loans of $1,045,207,000 at December 31, 2015 represented an increase of $129,628,000 from December 31, 2014. The
continued emphasis on well collateralized real estate loans was the primary driver of the overall increase in loans outstanding,
with home equity loans and lines of credit leading the way. The emphasis to add home equity lines of credit is part of the overall
strategy to shorten the duration of the earning asset portfolio in preparation of a rising interest rate environment. Several successful
campaigns to increase home equity, multifamily residential, and auto loans were undertaken during 2015 with the increase in
residential and commercial loans being directly correlated to the campaigns.
The amounts of loans outstanding at the indicated dates are shown in the following table according to type of loan at December 31,
2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012:
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Commercial, financial,
and agricultural . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . .
Construction. . . . . . .
Installment loans to
individuals . . . . . . . .
Net deferred loan fees
and discounts . . . . . .
$ 146,110
13.36% $ 164,072
15.70% $ 124,156
13.56% $ 105,029
12.83% $ 48,455
9.46%
564,740
306,182
34,650
51.64
28.00
3.17
526,183
302,539
26,824
50.34
28.95
2.57
457,760
291,348
21,996
50.00
31.82
2.40
399,781
282,476
17,282
48.86
34.52
2.11
252,142
182,031
20,067
49.22
35.54
3.92
43,256
3.96
27,001
2.58
21,509
2.35
14,647
1.79
10,659
2.08
(1,257)
(0.11)
(1,412)
(0.14)
(1,190)
(0.13)
(871)
(0.11)
(1,122)
(0.22)
Gross loans . . . . . . . . .
$1,093,681
100.00% $1,045,207
100.00% $ 915,579
100.00% $ 818,344
100.00% $ 512,232
100.00%
34 The amounts of domestic loans at December 31, 2016 are presented below by category and maturity:
(In Thousands)
Loans with variable interest rates:
1 year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 through 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 through 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After 10 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total floating interest rate loans . . . . . .
Loans with fixed interest rates:
1 year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 through 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 through 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After 10 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total predetermined interest rate loans .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred loan fees and discounts . .
Commercial,
financial,
and
agricultural
Real Estate
Residential
Commercial Construction
Installment
Loans to
Individuals
Total
$
24,622
$
13,036
$
16,547
$
1,694
$
1,150
$
57,049
7,620
30,223
36,697
99,162
1,532
22,631
21,612
1,173
46,948
3,401
21,532
495,569
533,538
1,193
6,099
9,274
14,636
31,202
6,709
47,724
221,738
292,718
1,401
6,290
4,251
1,522
13,464
—
1,086
25,637
28,417
2,328
2,340
631
934
6,233
56
—
2,590
3,796
738
23,097
13,560
2,065
39,460
$ 146,110
$ 564,740
$ 306,182
$
34,650
$
43,256
17,786
100,565
782,231
957,631
7,192
60,457
49,328
20,330
137,307
1,094,938
(1,257)
$1,093,681
·
·
The loan maturity information is based upon original loan terms and is not adjusted for “rollovers.” In the ordinary course
of business, loans maturing within one year may be renewed, in whole or in part, at interest rates prevailing at the date
of renewal.
Scheduled repayments are reported in maturity categories in which the payment is due.
The Banks do not make loans that provide for negative amortization, nor do any loans contain conversion features. The Banks did
not have any foreign loans outstanding at December 31, 2016.
The following table shows the amount of accrual and nonaccrual TDRs at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Accrual
Nonaccrual
Total
Accrual
Nonaccrual
Total
Accrual
Nonaccrual
Total
2016
2015
2014
Commercial, financial,
and agricultural . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . .
Installment loans to
individuals. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
109
$
132
$
241
$
320
$
149
$
469
$
551
$
440
$
991
1,491
4,723
—
541
2,184
—
2,032
6,907
—
1,428
5,085
—
353
2,312
—
1,781
7,397
—
697
3,267
514
181
6,160
—
878
9,427
514
—
$ 6,323
$
—
2,857
—
$ 9,180
—
$ 6,833
$
—
2,814
—
$ 9,647
—
$ 5,029
$
—
6,781
—
$ 11,810
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
2016
The allowance for loan losses represents the amount which management estimates is adequate to provide for probable losses
inherent in its loan portfolio, as of the consolidated balance sheet date. All loan losses are charged to the allowance and all
recoveries are credited to it per the allowance method of providing for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly
review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies,
35 ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served.
An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Banks. Management remains committed to an aggressive
program of problem loan identification and resolution.
The allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance
has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in
mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers industry standards
and trends with respect to nonperforming loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.
The allowance for loan losses increased from $12,044,000 at December 31, 2015 to $12,896,000 at December 31, 2016. At
December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was 1.18% of total loans compared to 1.15% of total loans at December 31,
2015. The increase in the allowance for loan losses to total loans was the result of the increased allowance for loan losses that
was partially offset by the increase in loan growth. The growth in the loan portfolio was driven by home equity product growth
which historically is a lower risk product than commercial loans and requires a lower allowance for loan losses. Net loan charge-
offs of $344,000 or 0.03% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2016 limited the impact of the provision for loan
losses of $1,196,000. Management concluded that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable losses inherent
in its loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date as noted in the provision for loan losses discussion.
Based on management’s loan-by-loan review, the past performance of the borrowers, and current economic conditions, including
recent business closures and bankruptcy levels, management does not anticipate any current losses related to nonaccrual,
nonperforming, or classified loans above those that have already been considered in its overall judgment of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses.
2015
The allowance for loan losses increased from $10,579,000 at December 31, 2014 to $12,044,000 at December 31, 2015. At
December 31, 2015, the allowance for loan losses was 1.15% of total loans compared to 1.16% of total loans at December 31,
2014. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses to total loans was the result of the increased allowance for loan losses that
was more than offset by the increase in loan growth. The growth in the loan portfolio was driven by home equity product growth
which historically is a lower risk product than commercial loans and requires a lower allowance for loan losses. Net loan charge-
offs of $835,000 or 0.09% of average loans for the year ended December 31, 2015 limited the impact of the provision for loan
losses of $2,300,000.
(In Thousands)
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
Amount % Total
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Allocation of The Allowance For Loan Losses
Balance at end of
period applicable to:
Commercial,
financial, and
agricultural
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Installment loans to
individuals
Unallocated
$ 1,554
13.34% $ 1,532
15.68% $ 1,124
13.54% $ 474
12.82% $
361
9.44%
5,383
4,975
178
416
390
51.58
27.96
3.17
3.95
—
5,116
4,217
160
243
776
50.27
28.91
2.56
2.58
—
3,755
4,205
786
245
464
49.93
31.78
2.40
2.35
—
3,917
4,079
741
139
794
48.80
34.48
2.11
1.79
—
1,954
3,831
950
144
377
49.11
35.46
3.91
2.08
—
$ 12,896
100.00% $12,044
100.00% $10,579
100.00% $10,144
100.00% $ 7,617
100.00%
NONPERFORMING LOANS
The increase in nonperforming loans during 2016 is primarily the result of a large commercial real estate loan that was placed on
non-accrual status. The majority of the nonperforming loans are centered on several loans that are either in a secured position
and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position and/or a specific allowance within the allowance for loan losses.
36 The following table presents information concerning nonperforming loans. The accrual of interest will be discontinued when the
principal or interest of a loan is in default for 90 days or more, or as soon as payment is questionable, unless the loan is well secured
and in the process of collection. Consumer loans and residential real estate loans secured by 1 to 4 family dwellings are not
ordinarily subject to those guidelines. The reversal of previously accrued but uncollected interest applicable to any loan placed
in a nonaccrual status and the treatment of subsequent payments of either principal or interest is handled in accordance with GAAP.
These principles do not require a write-off of previously accrued interest if principal and interest are ultimately protected by sound
collateral values. A nonperforming loan may be restored to accruing status when:
1.
2.
3.
Principal and interest is no longer due and unpaid;
It becomes well secured and in the process of collection; and
Prospects for future contractual payments are no longer in doubt.
(In Thousands)
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Nonperforming Loans
90 Days Past Due
Nonaccrual
Total
$
1,457
$
10,756
$
979
387
604
351
8,467
11,861
9,074
11,355
12,213
9,446
12,248
9,678
11,706
The level of non-accruing loans continues to fluctuate annually and is attributed to the various economic factors experienced both
regionally and nationally. Overall, the portfolio is well secured with a majority of the balance making regular payments or scheduled
to be satisfied in the near future. Presently, there are no significant amounts of loans where serious doubts exist as to the ability
of the borrower to comply with the current loan payment terms which are not included in the nonperforming categories as indicated
above.
Management’s judgment in determining the amount of the additions to the allowance charged to operating expense considers the
following factors with no single factor being determinative:
Economic conditions and the impact on the loan portfolio.
Analysis of past loan charge-offs experienced by category and comparison to outstanding loans.
Effect of problem loans on overall portfolio quality.
1.
2.
3.
4. Reports of examination of the loan portfolio by the Department and the FDIC.
DEPOSITS
2016 vs. 2015
Total average deposits increased $68,214,000 or 6.76% from 2015 to 2016. The growth is a result of an emphasis to increase and
solidify deposit relationships by focusing on core deposits, not time deposits. The actions caused average core deposits, which
exclude time deposits, to increase to 79.44% in 2016 from 78.16% for 2015.
2015 vs. 2014
Total average deposits increased $26,704,000 or 2.72% from 2014 to 2015. The growth is a result of an emphasis to increase and
solidify deposit relationships by focusing on core deposits, not time deposits. The actions caused average core deposits, which
exclude time deposits, to increase to 78.16% in 2015 from 77.25% for 2014. The level of deposits has been negatively impacted
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania budget impasse which has resulted in a decreased level of deposits held by the various
governmental entities serviced by the Banks.
37 The average amount and the average rate paid on deposits are summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,
and 2014:
(In Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Super Now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Money Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total average deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016
2015
2014
Average
Amount
Rate
Average
Amount
Rate
Average
Amount
Rate
$ 279,130
0.00% $ 251,029
0.00% $ 225,981
0.00%
151,397
187,106
238,175
221,498
0.04
0.24
0.27
1.08
143,055
187,396
207,252
220,360
0.04
0.26
0.27
0.92
140,575
182,229
210,066
223,537
0.06
0.32
0.27
0.79
$1,077,306
0.33% $1,009,092
0.31% $ 982,388
0.31%
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
2016
Shareholders’ equity increased $1,970,000 to $138,249,000 at December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015. Since
December 31, 2015, treasury stock purchases of $574,000 for 14,600 shares were completed as part of the stock repurchase plan.
The change in accumulated other comprehensive loss from $3,799,000 at December 31, 2015 to $4,928,000 at December 31, 2016
is a result of an increase in unrealized losses on available for sale securities from an unrealized gain of $258,000 at December 31,
2015 to an unrealized loss of $639,000 at December 31, 2016. The amount of accumulated other comprehensive loss at December
31, 2016 was also impacted by the change in net excess of the projected benefit obligation over the fair value of the plan assets
of the defined benefit pension plan resulting in a increase in the net loss of $232,000 to $4,289,000 at December 31, 2016. The
current level of shareholders’ equity equates to a book value per share of $29.20 at December 31, 2016 compared to $28.71 at
December 31, 2015 and an equity to asset ratio of 10.25% at December 31, 2016 compared to 10.32% at December 31, 2015.
Excluding goodwill and intangibles, book value per share was $25.21 at December 31, 2016 compared to $24.84 at December 31,
2015. Dividends declared for each of the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $0.47 and $1.88 per
share.
2015
Shareholders’ equity increased $312,000 to $136,279,000 at December 31, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014. Since December
31, 2014, treasury stock purchases of $2,603,000 for 60,018 shares were completed as part of the stock repurchase plan. The
change in accumulated other comprehensive loss from $1,667,000 at December 31, 2014 to $3,799,000 at December 31, 2015 is
a result of a decrease in unrealized gains on available for sale securities from an unrealized gain of $2,930,000 at December 31,
2014 to an unrealized gain of $258,000 at December 31, 2015. The amount of accumulated other comprehensive loss at December
31, 2015 was also impacted by the change in net excess of the projected benefit obligation over the fair value of the plan assets
of the defined benefit pension plan resulting in a decrease in the net loss of $540,000 to $4,057,000 at December 31, 2015. The
current level of shareholders’ equity equates to a book value per share of $28.71 at December 31, 2015 compared to $28.30 at
December 31, 2014 and an equity to asset ratio of 10.32% at December 31, 2015 compared to 10.92% at December 31, 2014.
Excluding goodwill and intangibles, book value per share was $24.84 at December 31, 2015 compared to $24.44 at December 31,
2014. Dividends declared for each of the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $0.47 and $1.88 per
share.
Bank regulators have risk based capital guidelines. Under these guidelines the Company and each Bank are required to maintain
minimum ratios of core capital and total qualifying capital as a percentage of risk weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet
items. At December 31, 2016, both the Company’s and each Bank’s required ratios were well above the minimum ratios as follows:
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total capital ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier 1 capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12.62%
12.62%
13.38%
9.43%
11.14%
11.14%
11.73%
8.89%
10.16%
10.16%
10.98%
8.54%
4.50%
6.00%
8.00%
4.00%
Company
Jersey Shore
State Bank
Luzerne
Bank
Minimum
Standards
38 For a more comprehensive discussion of these requirements, see “Regulation and Supervision” in Item 1 of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Management believes that the Company will continue to exceed regulatory capital requirements.
RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
The ratio of net income to average total assets and average shareholders’ equity, and other certain equity ratios are presented as
follows:
Percentage of net income to:
Average total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of dividends declared to net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of average shareholders’ equity to average total assets . . . . . . . .
0.93%
8.96%
71.37%
10.38%
1.08%
10.11%
64.52%
10.68%
1.19%
10.79%
61.99%
11.05%
2016
2015
2014
LIQUIDITY, INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY, AND MARKET RISK
The Asset/Liability Committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet
credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio. In assessing
liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.
The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited at December 31, 2016:
1. Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum
2. Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum
3. Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum
4. Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum
Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing
interest rate risk. The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations
to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders. Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business
opportunities as they arise. The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing
interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.
The Company, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet its liquidity needs for deposit
withdrawals, loan commitments, and expenses. In order to control cash flow, the Company estimates future flows of cash from
deposits and loan payments. The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-
backed securities, as well as FHLB borrowings. Funds generated are used principally to fund loans and purchase investment
securities. Management believes the Company has adequate resources to meet its normal funding requirements.
Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a short and long-term basis, thereby, providing management necessary
information to react to current balance sheet trends. Cash flow needs are assessed and sources of funds are determined. Funding
strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost. Both short and long term funding needs are addressed by maturities
and sales of available for sale investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments
such as federal funds sold. The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit, provides core ingredients to satisfy
depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.
Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity. Consideration is given to loan demand, investment
opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds. The Company has a current
borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $538,195,000 with $85,625,000 utilized, leaving $452,571,000 available. In addition to this
credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of $45,247,000. The Company’s
management believes that it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs.
Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the
Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities. Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and
39 investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them. Successful asset/liability management results
in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process is affected by segmenting
both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected.
Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities, for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once
known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates. Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can
enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted. However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions,
net interest income will suffer. Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed. In addition to gap
management, the Company has an asset liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which
is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects
of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company currently maintains a gap position of being asset sensitive. The Company has strategically taken this position as
it has decreased the duration of the earning asset portfolio by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity
loans and the selling of long-term municipal bonds. Lengthening of the liability portfolio is being undertaken to build protection
in a rising rate environment.
A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and
more specifically shareholders’ equity. The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance
with this calculation. The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphasis placed on interest rate sensitivity. Changes to
calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
In this analysis the Company examines the result of various changes in market interest rates in 100 basis point increments and
their effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner.
Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.
The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2017 assuming a static balance sheet as
of December 31, 2016.
(In Thousands)
(200)
(100)
Static
100
200
300
400
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . .
Change from static . . . . . . . . . .
Percent change from static . . . .
$ 38,002
$ 40,401
$
42,761
$ 44,678
$ 46,473
$ 48,031
$ 49,456
(4,759)
-11.13%
(2,360)
-5.52%
—
—
1,917
3,712
5,270
6,695
4.48%
8.68%
12.32%
15.66%
Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding
cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities. Actual
results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected
change. In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would
undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change. Generally, management
believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.
INFLATION
The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature; therefore, interest rates rather than inflation
have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance. Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or
magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors that are not
measured by a price index.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. The accounting policies are described in
detail in Note 1 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” Our most complex accounting policies require management’s
judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments, and contingencies. We have established detailed policies
and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to
period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an
40 appropriate manner. The following is a brief description of our current accounting policies involving significant management
valuation judgments.
Other Than Temporary Impairment of Debt and Equity Securities
Debt and equity securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary.
Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reason underlying the decline,
to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate that
the decline is permanent. It indicates that the prospects for a near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that
there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in
value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is
recognized. For a full discussion of the Company’s methodology of assessing impairment, refer to Note 4 of the “Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Allowance for Loan Losses
Arriving at an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of judgment. The Company’s allowance for
loan losses provides for probable losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio.
Management uses historical information to assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as well as the prevailing business
environment; as it is affected by changing economic conditions and various external factors, which may impact the portfolio in
ways currently unforeseen. The allowance is increased by provisions for loan losses and by recoveries of loans previously charged-
off and reduced by loans charged-off. For a full discussion of the Company’s methodology of assessing the adequacy of the reserve
for allowance for loan losses, refer to Note 1 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As discussed in Note 8 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” the Company must assess goodwill and other intangible
assets each year for impairment. This assessment involves estimating cash flows for future periods. If the future cash flows were
less than the recorded goodwill and other intangible assets balances, we would be required to take a charge against earnings to
write down the assets to the lower value.
Deferred Tax Assets
Management uses an estimate of future earnings to support their position that the benefit of their deferred tax assets will be realized.
If future income should prove non-existent or less than the amount of the deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they
may be applied, the asset may not be realized and the Company’s net income will be reduced. The Company’s deferred tax assets
are described further in Note 12 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Pension Benefits
Pension costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include discount
rates, benefits earned, interest costs, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. In accordance with GAAP,
actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect
recognized expense and the recorded obligation of future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are
appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the Company’s pension obligations and future
expense. Our pension benefits are described further in Note 13 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Company has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations which may require future cash payments. The
following table presents, as of December 31, 2016, significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by
payment date. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
41 Payments Due In
(In Thousands)
Deposits without a stated maturity . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repurchase agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One Year
or Less
One to Three
Years
Three to Five
Years
Over Five
Years
Total
$
876,839
$
— $
— $
— $
876,839
93,847
13,241
—
45,028
589
107,293
15,805
1,430
—
—
19,350
1,079
—
—
18,394
832
—
—
3,226
1,507
218,375
13,241
—
85,998
4,007
The Company’s operating lease obligations represent short and long-term lease and rental payments for branch facilities and
equipment. The Bank leases certain facilities under operating leases which expire on various dates through 2027. Renewal options
are available on the majority of these leases.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or
performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact. The Company wishes to
caution readers that the following important factors, among others in addition to the factors discussed in Item 1 - Business and in
Item 1A - Risk Factors, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s
actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on
behalf of the Company herein: (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including federal and state banking laws and
regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either
currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the
regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization,
compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the increasing
consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and
out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest
rates;and (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies.
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily from interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk. Interest rate risk and
liquidity risk management is performed at the Banks' level as well as the Company level. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity
is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced internally. Additional information and details
are provided in the Interest Sensitivity section of Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook
changes.
42 ITEM 8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Penns
Woods Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 10, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Penns Woods
Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2017
43 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31,
2016
2015
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
ASSETS:
Noninterest-bearing balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
26,766
16,905
43,671
22,044
752
22,796
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities, trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL ASSETS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
133,492
58
1,953
1,093,681
(12,896)
1,080,785
24,275
3,672
27,332
586
17,104
1,799
8,397
5,466
$ 1,348,590
176,157
73
757
1,045,207
(12,044)
1,033,163
21,830
3,686
26,667
899
17,104
1,240
8,990
6,695
$ 1,320,057
LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest-bearing deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
791,937
303,277
1,095,214
$
751,797
280,083
1,031,880
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,241
85,998
455
15,433
1,210,341
46,638
91,025
426
13,809
1,183,778
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,007,109 and 5,004,984 shares
issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
—
41,726
50,075
61,610
—
41,708
49,992
58,038
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Defined benefit plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock at cost, 272,452 and 257,852 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(639)
(4,289)
(10,234)
138,249
$ 1,348,590
258
(4,057)
(9,660)
136,279
$ 1,320,057
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
44 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Investment securities:
Taxable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend and other interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
42,056
$
39,134
$
36,495
2,424
1,498
835
46,813
3,547
46
1,974
5,567
3,426
2,795
769
46,124
3,129
116
1,974
5,219
5,111
3,453
547
45,606
2,995
54
1,913
4,962
NET INTEREST INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41,246
40,905
40,644
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,196
2,300
2,850
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES . . . . . . . .
40,050
38,605
37,794
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities gains (losses), trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokerage commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pennsylvania shares tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME TAX PROVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2,249
1,611
58
684
2,102
795
1,098
3,516
12,113
17,813
2,223
2,793
873
312
767
740
366
9,204
35,091
17,072
4,597
12,475
EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2.64
2,383
2,592
(22)
720
1,743
781
1,064
3,504
12,765
17,023
2,248
2,622
954
661
867
612
311
8,438
33,736
17,634
3,736
13,898
2.91
$
$
2,419
3,515
—
923
1,803
1,146
1,077
3,625
14,508
17,273
2,301
2,536
907
661
746
532
345
8,589
33,890
18,412
3,804
14,608
3.03
$
$
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED. . 4,735,457
4,772,239
4,816,149
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1.88
$
1.88
$
1.88
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
45 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net realized gain included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Accretion) amortization of unrecognized pension and post-retirement items. . . .
Tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
12,475
$
13,898
$
14,608
252
(85)
(1,611)
547
(352)
120
(1,129)
11,346
$
(1,457)
495
(2,592)
882
817
(277)
(2,132)
11,766
$
11,242
(3,822)
(3,515)
1,195
(2,837)
964
3,227
$
17,835
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
SHARES
AMOUNT
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
RETAINED
EARNINGS
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
(LOSS) INCOME
TREASURY
STOCK
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . .
4,999,929
$ 41,665
$
49,800
$
47,554
$
(4,894) $
(6,310) $
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,720
23
96
Purchase of treasury stock (17,238
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2014 . . . . . .
5,002,649
41,688
49,896
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,335
20
96
Purchase of treasury stock (60,018
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2015 . . . . . .
5,004,984
41,708
49,992
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared, ($1.88 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares issued for
employee stock purchase plan . . . .
2,125
18
83
Purchase of treasury stock (14,600
shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,608
(9,055)
53,107
13,898
(8,967)
58,038
12,475
(8,903)
3,227
(1,667)
(2,132)
(3,799)
(1,129)
(747)
(7,057)
(2,603)
(9,660)
(574)
127,815
14,608
3,227
(9,055)
119
(747)
135,967
13,898
(2,132)
(8,967)
116
(2,603)
136,279
12,475
(1,129)
(8,903)
101
(574)
Balance, December 31, 2016 . . . . . .
5,007,109
$ 41,726
$
50,075
$
61,610
$
(4,928) $
(10,234) $
138,249
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
46 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2016
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
$
12,475
$
13,898
$
14,608
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums. . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Originations of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds of loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net securities (gains) losses, trading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in deferred tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from calls and maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of bank premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of regulatory stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for investing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from long-term borrowings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
3,146
366
1,196
870
(1,611)
(68,362)
69,268
(2,102)
(58)
3,826
(3,753)
(684)
1,543
(7)
16,113
44,829
25,558
(28,322)
(49,590)
(4,061)
859
(27)
—
3,160
(3,178)
(10,772)
40,140
23,194
—
(5,027)
(33,397)
(8,903)
101
(574)
15,534
20,875
22,796
43,671
3,366
311
2,300
873
(2,592)
(56,058)
57,594
(1,743)
22
709
(804)
(720)
209
(1,630)
15,735
65,672
22,859
(32,776)
(130,803)
(2,285)
1,868
(30)
—
10,790
(12,818)
(77,523)
13,756
36,705
30,625
(10,776)
5,820
(8,967)
116
(2,603)
64,676
2,888
19,908
22,796
$
3,078
345
2,850
672
(3,515)
(51,119)
53,998
(1,803)
—
—
—
(923)
124
423
18,738
102,145
13,354
(47,902)
(101,816)
(2,795)
1,059
(30)
367
3,955
(4,583)
(36,246)
(17,584)
26,001
—
(26)
14,102
(9,055)
119
(747)
12,810
(4,698)
24,606
19,908
$
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
47 (In Thousands)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
$
5,538
4,025
772
$
5,174
2,933
340
4,986
3,750
2,166
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
48 PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Jersey Shore State Bank (“JSSB”), Luzerne Bank ("Luzerne" collectively with JSSB "Banks"), Woods Real Estate
Development Co., Inc., Woods Investment Company, Inc., and The M Group Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group
(“The M Group”), a wholly owned subsidiary of JSSB, (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Nature of Business
The Banks engage in a full-service commercial banking business, making available to the community a wide range of financial
services including, but not limited to, installment loans, credit cards, mortgage and home equity loans, lines of credit, construction
financing, farm loans, community development loans, loans to non-profit entities and local government, and various types of
demand and time deposits including, but not limited to, checking accounts, savings accounts, money market deposit accounts,
certificates of deposit, and IRAs. Deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the extent
provided by law.
The financial services are provided by the Banks to individuals, partnerships, non-profit organizations, and corporations through
their twenty-three offices located in Clinton, Lycoming, Centre, Montour, Union, and Luzerne Counties, Pennsylvania.
Woods Real Estate Development Co., Inc. engages in real estate transactions on behalf of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and the
Banks.
Woods Investment Company, Inc., a Delaware holding company, is engaged in investing activities.
The M Group engages in securities brokerage and financial planning services, which include the sale of life insurance products,
annuities, and estate planning services.
Operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporate-wide basis. Accordingly, all financial service
operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
valuation of net deferred tax assets, impairment of goodwill, other than temporary impairment of debt and equity securities, fair
value of financial instruments, and the valuation of real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure on settlement of debt.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks and federal funds sold. Interest-earning deposits mature within 90
days and are carried at cost. Net cash flows are reported for loan, deposit, and short-term borrowing transactions.
Restrictions on Cash and Cash Equivalents
Based on deposit levels, the Banks must maintain cash and other reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (FRB).
49 Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on management’s intention and ability, as securities held to
maturity, securities available for sale, or securities held for trading. Debt securities acquired with the intent and ability to hold to
maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, which are computed using the interest
method and recognized as adjustments of interest income. Certain other debt securities have been classified as available for sale
to serve principally as a source of liquidity. Unrealized holding gains and losses for available for sale securities are reported as a
separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax, until realized. Unrealized holding gains and losses for equity securities
held for trading are recognized as a separate component within the income statement. Realized security gains and losses are
computed using the specific identification method for debt securities and the average cost method for marketable equity securities.
Interest and dividends on investment securities are recognized as income when earned.
Securities are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment based upon a number of factors, including, but not
limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition of the underlying
issuer, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, the likelihood of the security’s ability to recover any decline in its
fair value, whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery
in fair value, and a review of the Company’s capital adequacy, interest rate risk position, and liquidity. The assessment of a security’s
ability to recover any decline in fair value, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, and management’s intent and
ability requires considerable judgment. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within
non-interest income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Investment securities fair values are based on observed market prices. Certain investment securities do not have observed bid
prices and their fair value is based on instruments with similar risk elements. Since regulatory stock is redeemable at par, the
Company carries it at cost.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff generally are stated
at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred fees and discounts, unamortized loan fees and costs, and the allowance for
loan losses. Interest on loans is recognized as income when earned on the accrual method. The Company’s general policy has
been to stop accruing interest on loans when it is determined a reasonable doubt exists as to the collectability of additional interest.
Income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received provided the loan is not delinquent in
payment and, in management’s judgment, the borrower has the ability and intent to make future principal payments. Otherwise,
payments are applied to the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Loans are restored to accrual status if certain conditions are met,
including but not limited to, the repayment of all unpaid interest and scheduled principal due, ongoing performance consistent
with the contractual agreement, and the future expectation of continued, timely payments.
Loan origination and commitment fees as well as certain direct loan origination costs are being deferred and amortized as an
adjustment to the related loan’s yield over the contractual lives of the related loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents the amount which management estimates is adequate to provide for probable losses
inherent in its loan portfolio, as of the Consolidated Balance Sheet date. The allowance method is used in providing for loan
losses. Accordingly, all loan losses are charged to the allowance and all recoveries are credited to it. The allowance for loan losses
is established through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s
quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze
delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the
markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Bank. Management remains committed
to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.
The allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance
has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in
mix and volume of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, and general economic conditions. In addition, management
considers industry standards and trends with respect to nonperforming loans and its knowledge and experience with specific
lending segments.
Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for
loan losses is adequate at December 31, 2016, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
50 differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy, rising
unemployment, or negative performance trends in financial information from borrowers could be indicators of subsequent increased
levels of nonperforming assets and possible charge-offs, which would normally require increased loan loss provisions. An integral
part of the periodic regulatory examination process is the review of the adequacy of the Banks' loan loss allowance. The regulatory
agencies could require the Banks, based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examination, to provide
additional loan loss provisions to further supplement the allowance.
Impaired loans are commercial and commercial real estate loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all
amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Banks individually evaluate such loans for impairment
and do not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of
“nonaccrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Banks may choose to place a loan on nonaccrual status due to
payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired if the loan is not a commercial or
commercial real estate loan. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral
value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected
cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of
collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loans. When foreclosure
is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans
and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days
or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case
basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the
borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Loan Charge-off Policies
Loans are generally fully or partially charged down to the fair value of collateral securing the asset when:
•
•
•
•
•
management judges the asset to be uncollectible;
repayment is deemed to be protracted beyond reasonable time frames;
the asset has been classified as a loss by either the internal loan review process or external examiners;
the borrower has filed bankruptcy and the loss becomes evident due to a lack of assets; or
the loan is 180 days past due unless both well secured and in the process of collection.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, management may grant a concession
for other than an insignificant period of time to the borrower that would not otherwise be considered, the related loan is classified
as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). Management strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them
to modify to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions,
principal forgiveness, payment forbearance, and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure
or repossession of the collateral. In cases where borrowers are granted new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or
principal, management measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans.
In addition to the allowance for the pooled portfolios, management has developed a separate allowance for loans that are identified
as impaired through a TDR. These loans are excluded from pooled loss forecasts and a separate reserve is provided under the
accounting guidance for loan impairment. Consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR are also individually analyzed
for estimated impairment.
Loans Held for Sale
In general, fixed rate residential mortgage loans originated by the Banks are held for sale and are carried at cost due to their short
holding period, which can range from less than two weeks to a maximum of thirty days. Sold loans are not serviced by the Banks.
Proceeds from the sale of loans in excess of the carrying value are accounted for as a gain. Total gains on the sale of loans are
shown as a component of non-interest income within the Consolidated Statement of Income.
51 Foreclosed Assets
Foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Prior to foreclosure, the value of the
underlying loan is written down to the fair value of the real estate to be acquired by a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if
necessary. Any subsequent write-downs are charged against operating expenses. Net operating expenses and gains and losses
realized from disposition are included in non-interest expense and income, respectively, within the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using
straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from five to ten years for
furniture, fixtures, and equipment and fifteen to forty years for buildings and improvements. Costs incurred for routine maintenance
and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Costs of major additions and improvements are capitalized.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain officers and directors. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at
its cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. Increases in the cash surrender value are recognized as a component
of non-interest income within the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Goodwill
The Company performs an annual impairment analysis of goodwill for its purchased subsidiaries, Luzerne and The M Group.
Based on the fair value of these reporting units, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, no impairment
of goodwill was recognized in 2016, 2015, or 2014.
Intangible Assets
At December 31, 2016, the Company had intangible assets of $876,000 as a result of the acquisition of Luzerne National Bank
Corporation, which is net of accumulated amortization of $1,138,000. These intangible assets will continue to be amortized using
the sum-of-the-years digits method of amortization over ten years. The Company also had intangible assets of $923,000, which
is net of accumulated amortization of $97,000, as a result of the purchase of two books of business related to investment product
sales. The book of business intangible is being amortized using the straight-line method over a period of ten years.
Investments in Limited Partnerships
The Company is a limited partner in four partnerships at December 31, 2016 that provide low income elderly housing in the
Company’s geographic market area. The carrying value of the Company’s investments in limited partnerships was $586,000 at
December 31, 2016 and $899,000 at December 31, 2015. The investments are being amortized over the ten-year tax credit receipt
period utilizing the straight-line method. The partnerships are amortized once the projects reach the level of occupancy needed
to begin the ten year tax credit recognition period. Amortization of limited partnership investments amounted to $312,000 in 2016
and $661,000 in 2015 and 2014.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into off-balance sheet financial instruments. Those instruments consist of
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. When those instruments are funded or become payable, the Company
reports the amounts in its financial statements.
Marketing Cost
Marketing costs are generally expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in
the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the
52 appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-
than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized
upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be
recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions
that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting
period in which that threshold is no longer met.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences in financial and income tax methods of accounting, and are
reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected
to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the
provision for income taxes. The Company analyzed its deferred tax asset position and determined that there was not a need for a
valuation allowance due to the Company’s ability to generate future ordinary and capital taxable income.
The Company when applicable recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax provision.
Earnings Per Share
The Company provides dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated utilizing
net income as reported in the numerator and weighted average shares outstanding in the denominator. The computation of diluted
earnings per share differs in that the dilutive effects of any stock options are adjusted in the denominator.
Employee Benefits
Pension and employee benefits include contributions, determined actuarially, to a defined benefit retirement plan covering the
eligible employees of JSSB. The plan is funded on a current basis to the extent that it is deductible under existing federal tax
regulations. Pension and other employee benefits also include contributions to a defined contribution Section 401(k) plan covering
eligible employees. Contributions matching those made by eligible employees are funded throughout the year. In addition, an
elective contribution may be made annually at the discretion of the board of directors for the employees of JSSB with a contribution
being made in 2015. No elective contributions were made for 2016.
The M Group Products and Income Recognition
The M Group product line is comprised primarily of annuities, life insurance, and mutual funds. The revenues generated from
life insurance sales are commission only, as The M Group does not underwrite the policies. Life insurance sales include permanent
and term policies with the majority of the policies written being permanent. Term life insurance policies are written for 10, 15,
20, and 30 year terms with the majority of the policies being written for 20 years. None of these products are offered as an integral
part of lending activities.
Commissions from the sale of annuities are recognized at the time notice is received from the third party broker/dealer or an
insurance company that the transaction has been accepted and approved, which is also the time when commission income is
received.
Life insurance commissions are recognized at varying points based on the payment option chosen by the customer. Commissions
from monthly and annual payment plans are recognized at the start of each annual period for the life insurance, while quarterly
and semi-annual premium payments are recognized quarterly and semi-annually when the earnings process is complete. For
example, semi-annual payments on the first of January and July would result in commission income recognition on the first of
January and July, while payments on the first of January, April, July, and October would result in commission income recognition
on those dates. The potential for chargebacks only exists for those policies on a monthly payment plan since income is recognized
at the beginning of the annual coverage period versus at the time of each monthly payment. No liability is maintained for
chargebacks as these are removed from income at the time of the occurrence.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company is required to present accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in a full set of general-purpose financial
statements for all periods presented. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized holding gains
(losses) on the available for sale securities portfolio and the unrecognized components of net periodic benefit costs of the defined
benefit pension plan.
53 Segment Reporting
The Company has determined that its only reportable segment is Community Banking.
Reclassification of Comparative Amounts
Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s reporting format. Such reclassifications
did not affect net income or shareholders’ equity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (a new revenue recognition
standard). The Update’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or
services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange
for those goods or services. In addition, this Update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a
contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This Update is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic
205-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance in accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's
ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update are
effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter.
Early application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments
in this Update defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain
not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other
entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is
evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting Update.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred
Taxes. The amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a
classified statement of financial position. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities that present a classified
statement of financial position. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial
statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual
periods. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15,
2018. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The
amendments in this Update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively
to all periods presented. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition
and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This Update applies to all entities that hold financial
assets or owe financial liabilities and is intended to provide more useful information on the recognition, measurement,
presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other things, this Update (a) requires equity investments
(except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee)
to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (b) simplifies the impairment assessment
of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify
impairment; (c) eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized
54 cost for entities that are not public business entities; (d) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to
disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for
financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (e) requires public business entities to use the
exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (f) requires separate
presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is,
securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and
(g) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-
for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those
fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of
Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that
are not public business entities may adopt the amendments in this Update earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the
assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial
position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the
underlying asset for the lease term. A short-term lease is defined as one in which (a) the lease term is 12 months or
less and (b) there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. For
short-term leases, lessees may elect to recognize lease payments over the lease term on a straight-line basis. For public
business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and
interim periods within those years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.
The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective
approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results
of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in this Update
apply to all reporting entities for which there is a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been
designated as a heading instrument under Topic 815. The standards in this Update clarify that a change in the counterparty
to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815 does not, in and of itself,
require designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments
in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and
interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. An entity has an option to apply the amendments
in this Update on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments apply to all
entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have
a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. The amendments in this Update clarify the requirements for assessing
whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and
closely related to their debt host. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in this Update is required
to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. For public business
entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For entities other than public business entities, the
amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2017, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including
55 adoption in an interim period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The
Update affects all entities that have an investment that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting as a
result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. The amendments in this Update eliminate
the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level
of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained
earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods
that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring
the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity
method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon
qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments
in this Update require that an entity that has an available-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity
method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other
comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The amendments
in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the
level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. Earlier application
is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments
in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that
enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services (that are an output of the entity’s ordinary activities)
in exchange for consideration. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in
Topic 606; they simply clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments
in this Update are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal
versus agent considerations. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for
the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of Update 2014-09. ASU
No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective
date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard
will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The amendments
in this Update affect all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The standards in this Update
provide simplification for several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income
tax consequences, classification of awards as with equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.
Some of the areas for simplification apply only to nonpublic entities. In addition to those simplifications, the
amendments eliminate the guidance in Topic 718 that was indefinitely deferred shortly after the issuance of FASB
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. This should not result in a change in practice because the
guidance that is being superseded was never effective. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For
all other entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim
periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any
interim or annual period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments
in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that
enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services in exchange for consideration. The amendments in
this Update do not change the core principle for revenue recognition in Topic 606. Instead, the amendments provide
(1) more detailed guidance in a few areas and (2) additional implementation guidance and examples based on feedback
the FASB received from its stakeholders. The amendments are expected to reduce the degree of judgment necessary
to comply with Topic 606, which the FASB expects will reduce the potential for diversity arising in practice and reduce
56 the cost and complexity of applying the guidance. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition
requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic
606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivative and Hedging (Topic
815), which rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016, Emerging
Issues Task Force meeting. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which among
other things clarifies the objective of the collectability criterion in Topic 606, as well as certain narrow aspects of Topic
606. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update
are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update
2014-09). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers
the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Company’s financial statements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses
on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. This
Update is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other
financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The underlying premise of the Update is
that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through
an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should
reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of a financial
asset. The income statement will be effected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets,
as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU
2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted
for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. With certain exceptions, transition to the new
requirements will be through a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the
first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption
of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of
reducing diversity in practice. Among these include recognizing cash payments for debt prepayment or debt
extinguishment as cash outflows for financing activities; cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance
claims should be classified on the basis of the related insurance coverage; and cash proceeds received from the settlement
of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as cash inflows from investing activities while the cash
payments for premiums on bank-owned policies may be classified as cash outflows for investing activities, operating
activities, or a combination of investing and operating activities. The amendments in this Update are effective for
public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and
interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption
in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected
as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt
all of the amendments in the same period. The amendments in this Update should be applied using a retrospective
transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of
the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of
cash flows.
57 In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires
recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory)
when the transfer occurs. Consequently, the amendments in this Update eliminate the exception for an intra-entity
transfer of an asset other than inventory. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. For
all other entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and
interim reporting periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have
not been issued or made available for issuance. That is, earlier adoption should be in the first interim period if an entity
issues interim financial statements. The amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective
basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (“ASU 2016-18”), which
requires that a statement of cash flows explains the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and
amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described
as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling
the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in
this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is
permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any
adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments
in this Update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of cash flows.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-19, Technical Corrections and Improvements, which represents changes
to clarify, correct errors, or make minor improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments
make the Accounting Standards Codification easier to understand and easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies
and providing clarifications. Most of the amendments in this Update do not require transition guidance and are effective
upon issuance of this Update. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue
from Contracts with Customers “ASU 2016-20”. This Update, among others things, clarifies that guarantee fees within
the scope of Topic 460, Guarantees, (other than product or service warranties) are not within the scope of Topic 606.
The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-20 are the same as the effective date and transition
requirements for the new revenue recognition guidance. For public entities with a calendar year-end, the new guidance
is effective in the quarter and year beginning January 1, 2018. For all other entities with a calendar year-end, the new
guidance is effective in the year ending December 31, 2019, and interim periods in 2020. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a
Business “ASU 2017-01”, which provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and
activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair
value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar
identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further
evaluated. Public business entities should apply the amendments in this Update to annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. All other entities should apply the amendments
to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date.
This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
58 NOTE 2 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component shown net of tax as of December 31, 2016 and
2015 were as follows:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2016
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2015
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2014
Net Unrealized
Gain(Loss)
on Available
for Sale
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Total
Net Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Available
for Sale
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Total
Net Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Available
for Sale
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Total
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . .
$
258
$ (4,057) $ (3,799) $
2,930
$ (4,597) $ (1,667) $
(2,169) $ (2,725) $ (4,894)
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassifications . . . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive (loss)
income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net current-period other
comprehensive (loss) income
167
(333)
(166)
(962)
435
(527)
7,419
(2,010)
5,409
(1,064)
101
(963)
(1,710)
105
(1,605)
(2,320)
138
(2,182)
(897)
(232)
(1,129)
(2,672)
540
(2,132)
5,099
(1,872)
3,227
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(639) $ (4,289) $ (4,928) $
258
$ (4,057) $ (3,799) $
2,930
$ (4,597) $ (1,667)
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income shown, net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits to net
income, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
(In Thousands)
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
Twelve Months Ended
Affected Line Item
in the Consolidated
Statement of Income
$
1,611
(547)
1,064
(153)
52
(101) $
$
2,592
(882)
1,710
(159)
54
(105) $
3,515 Securities gains, net
(1,195)
Income tax provision
2,320 Net of tax
(209)
71
Salaries and employee
benefits
Income tax provision
(138) Net of tax
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income Components
Net realized gain on available
for sale securities. . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax effect. . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrecognized pension costs
Income tax effect. . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
NOTE 3 - PER SHARE DATA
There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share;
therefore, net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator. The following table
sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive per share
computation.
Weighted average common shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average treasury stock shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average common shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per
share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
5,005,971
(270,514)
5,003,691
(231,452)
5,001,171
(185,022)
4,735,457
4,772,239
4,816,149
There were 38,750 stock options issued during the third quarter of 2015 with 26,500 outstanding at December 31, 2016. The
outstanding stock options did not impact diluted earnings per share as the strike price of the options was greater than the market
price. There were no stock options outstanding during 2014.
59 NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost, gross gains and losses, and fair values of investment securities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
2016
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
$
— $
— $
(In Thousands)
Available for sale (AFS):
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total investment securities AFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(In Thousands)
Available for sale (AFS):
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total investment securities AFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,295
109
60,777
53,046
123,227
9,566
1,667
11,233
134,460
Amortized
Cost
3,586
9,785
1,960
84,992
59,832
160,155
10,397
5,214
15,611
175,766
$
$
$
$
$
$
182
—
666
137
985
969
—
969
1,954
$
— $
(164)
—
(509)
(2,065)
(2,738)
—
(184)
(184)
(2,922) $
—
9,313
109
60,934
51,118
121,474
10,535
1,483
12,018
133,492
2015
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
— $
284
—
1,797
185
2,266
1,100
70
1,170
3,436
$
(37) $
(60)
(20)
(234)
(2,245)
(2,596)
(14)
(435)
(449)
(3,045) $
3,549
10,009
1,940
86,555
57,772
159,825
11,483
4,849
16,332
176,157
The amortized cost and fair values of trading investment securities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows.
(In Thousands)
Trading:
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total trading securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2016
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
— $
— $
56
56
$
2
2
$
— $
—
— $
—
58
58
60 (In Thousands)
Trading:
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total trading securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2015
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
78
—
78
$
$
— $
—
— $
(5) $
—
(5) $
73
—
73
The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length
of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
(In Thousands)
Available for Sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities. . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Investment Securities AFS . . . . . . . .
(In Thousands)
Available for Sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities. . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Investment Securities AFS . . . . . . . .
2016
Less than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or Greater
Total
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
$
— $
— $
— $
3,572
—
26,113
28,140
57,825
—
727
727
58,552
$
(106)
—
(509)
(1,179)
(1,794)
—
(140)
(140)
(1,934) $
3,627
—
—
12,240
15,867
—
756
756
16,623
$
$
— $
(58)
—
—
(886)
(944)
—
(44)
(44)
(988) $
— $
7,199
—
26,113
40,380
73,692
—
1,483
1,483
75,175
$
—
(164)
—
(509)
(2,065)
(2,738)
—
(184)
(184)
(2,922)
2015
Less than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or Greater
Total
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
$
— $
6,081
1,626
7,345
24,381
39,433
—
2,363
2,363
41,796
$
$
— $
(60)
(16)
(47)
(530)
(653)
—
(277)
(277)
(930) $
3,549
—
314
1,656
22,547
28,066
53
1,001
1,054
29,120
$
$
(37) $
—
(4)
(187)
(1,715)
(1,943)
(14)
(158)
(172)
(2,115) $
3,549
6,081
1,940
9,001
46,928
67,499
53
3,364
3,417
70,916
$
$
(37)
(60)
(20)
(234)
(2,245)
(2,596)
(14)
(435)
(449)
(3,045)
At December 31, 2016 there were 73 individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months
and 10 individual securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months.
The Company reviews its position quarterly and has asserted that at December 31, 2016 and 2015, the declines outlined in the
above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe they will be required to
sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. The Company has concluded that any impairment
61 of its investment securities portfolio is not other than temporary but is the result of interest rate changes that are not expected to
result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without
call or prepayment penalties.
(In Thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Due in one year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after one year to five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after five years to ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
577
$
41,114
67,181
14,355
577
40,646
65,631
14,620
123,227
$
121,474
Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $44,829,000 , $65,672,000, and $102,145,000 for 2016, 2015,
and 2014, respectively. The following table represents gross realized gains and losses on those transactions:
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
(In Thousands)
Gross realized gains:
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total gross realized gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross realized losses:
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total gross realized losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
$
11
35
787
283
572
217
1,905
5
13
1
189
—
86
— $
—
1,571
825
183
132
59
89
2,327
622
710
491
2,711
$
4,298
— $
—
22
54
—
43
45
—
412
209
—
117
783
$
294
$
119
$
There were no impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.
Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $95,199,000 and $131,089,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law.
There is no concentration of investments that exceed ten percent of shareholders’ equity for any individual issuer, excluding those
guaranteed by the U.S. Government.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
The Banks are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh and as such, is required to maintain a minimum
investment in stock of the FHLB that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the FHLB. The stock is bought from and
sold to the FHLB based upon its $100 par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified
as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated for impairment as necessary. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate
recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will
ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (a) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB
62 as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted (b) commitments by the FHLB to make
payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance (c) the impact of
legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB and (d) the liquidity position of the FHLB.
Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. Management
considered that the FHLB maintains regulatory capital ratios in excess of all regulatory capital requirements, liquidity appears
adequate, new shares of FHLB stock continue to change hands at the $100 par value, and the payment of dividends.
NOTE 6 - LOAN CREDIT QUALITY AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Management segments the Banks' loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk
characteristics. Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics. Categories include commercial, financial,
and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Real estate loans are further segmented into three categories:
residential, commercial, and construction.
The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Current
Past Due
30 To 89
Days
2016
Past Due 90
Days Or More
& Still Accruing
Non-Accrual
Total
$
145,179
$
785
$
14
$
132
$
146,110
Commercial, financial, and agricultural . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment loans to individuals. . . . . . . . . .
553,053
296,537
33,879
43,008
9,112
786
771
202
587
268
—
1
1,988
8,591
—
45
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,071,656
$
11,656
$
870
$
10,756
Net deferred loan fees and discounts . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,257)
(12,896)
$ 1,057,503
(In Thousands)
Current
Past Due
30 To 89
Days
2015
Past Due 90
Days Or More
& Still Accruing
Non-Accrual
Total
$
162,312
$
164
$
— $
1,596
$
164,072
Commercial, financial, and agricultural . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Installment loans to individuals. . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred loan fees and discounts . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,412)
(12,044)
$ 1,015,510
517,753
295,784
26,545
26,572
6,827
720
67
429
714
265
—
—
889
5,770
212
—
1,028,966
$
8,207
$
979
$
8,467
Purchased loans acquired are recorded at fair value on their purchase date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan
losses.
Upon acquisition, the Company evaluated whether each acquired loan (regardless of size) was within the scope of ASC 310-30.
Purchased credit-impaired loans are loans that have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date
of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. The fair value of
564,740
306,182
34,650
43,256
1,094,938
(1,257)
(12,896)
$ 1,080,785
526,183
302,539
26,824
27,001
1,046,619
(1,412)
(12,044)
$ 1,033,163
63 purchased credit-impaired loans, on the acquisition date, was determined, primarily based on the fair value of loan collateral. The
carrying value of purchased loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality was $125,000 at December 31, 2016.
On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the unpaid principal balance for all loans evidencing credit impairment acquired
in the Luzerne acquisition was $1,211,000 and the estimated fair value of the loans was $878,000. Total contractually required
payments on these loans, including interest, at the acquisition date was $1,783,000. However, the Company’s preliminary estimate
of expected cash flows was $941,000. At such date, the Company established a credit risk related non-accretable discount (a
discount representing amounts which are not expected to be collected from the customer nor liquidation of collateral) of $842,000
relating to these impaired loans, reflected in the recorded net fair value. Such amount is reflected as a non-accretable fair value
adjustment to loans. The Company further estimated the timing and amount of expected cash flows in excess of the estimated fair
value and established an accretable discount of $63,000 on the acquisition date relating to these impaired loans.
The following table presents the interest income if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate
of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2016,
2015, and 2014:
2016
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
$
$
6
$
— $
48
$
53
$
42
$
33
151
496
3
656
$
101
105
2
208
$
53
281
16
398
$
38
54
—
145
$
63
600
63
768
$
34
264
2
333
(In Thousands)
Commercial,
financial, and
agricultural. . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential. . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . .
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual
terms of the loan agreement. The Banks individually evaluate such loans for impairment and do not aggregate loans by major
risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two
categories overlap. The Banks may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain
collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include
payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between
the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a
practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded
amount of the loan. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than
$100,000 and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard or worse. Management may also elect
to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than $100,000 on a case by case basis.
Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans
and are measured for impairment collectively with the exception of loans identified as troubled debt restructurings. Loans that
experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding
the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in
relation to the principal and interest owed. Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent to the Banks' policy on non-
accrual loans.
64 The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
(In Thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
$
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total:
109
$
109
$
1,584
1,833
—
3,526
132
1,893
10,425
—
12,450
1,584
1,833
—
3,526
132
1,893
10,520
—
12,545
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
241
241
3,477
12,258
—
3,477
12,353
—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
15,976
$
16,071
$
—
—
—
—
—
74
437
1,668
—
2,179
74
437
1,668
—
2,179
65 2015
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
(In Thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
$
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
319
$
319
$
1,142
1,735
212
3,408
150
1,573
10,752
—
12,475
1,142
1,785
212
3,458
150
1,703
10,752
—
12,605
Total:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
469
469
2,715
12,487
212
2,845
12,537
212
$
15,883
$
16,063
$
—
—
—
—
—
75
376
1,653
—
2,104
75
376
1,653
—
2,104
The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for
December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In Thousands)
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
2016
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
$
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
400
$
16
$
3,471
12,887
138
16,896
$
89
187
—
292
$
1
101
110
—
212
66 (In Thousands)
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
2015
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
$
1,031
$
21
$
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,570
17,529
865
72
342
1
$
21,995
$
436
$
10
47
80
53
190
(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial, and agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
$
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
2014
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
763
$
26
$
1,245
10,987
1,086
46
130
17
$
14,081
$
219
$
25
20
101
89
235
Additional funds totaling $23,000 are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
Modifications
The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR), where economic
concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These
concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions,
forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure
and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable
period, generally six months.
Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as
follows:
(In Thousands,
Except Number of Contracts)
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Number
of
Contracts
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Number
of
Contracts
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
— $
— $
3
1
—
4
$
397
400
—
797
$
—
397
400
—
797
4
$
213
$
213
11
6
1
22
$
962
1,013
398
2,586
$
962
1,013
398
2,586
67 The four new troubled debt restructurings that were granted for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaling $797,000 were granted
term concessions.
Of the twenty-two new troubled debt restructurings granted for the year ended December 31, 2015, seven loans totaling $1,008,000
were granted payment concessions, four loans totaling $183,000 were granted term concessions, two loans totaling $287,000 were
granted rate concessions, and nine loans totaling 1,108,000 were granted concessions due to other default.
Loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings made during the twelve months previous to December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, that defaulted during the corresponding twelve month periods were as follows:
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
Commercial, financial, and agricultural .
Real estate mortgage:
Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal Risk Ratings
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Number of
Contracts
Recorded
Investment
Number of
Contracts
Recorded
Investment
— $
—
—
— $
—
—
—
—
1
6
1
8
$
$
106
374
242
722
Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six
categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management
generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are
potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification.
Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct
possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are evaluated
for Substandard classification. Loans in the Doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the Substandard loans,
however, the weaknesses are more pronounced. Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable. However, these loans
are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt. Loans classified Loss are considered
uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.
To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the
Banks have a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and
residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death
occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. An external annual loan review of large commercial relationships is performed,
as well as a sample of smaller transactions. During 2016, the threshold for the annual loan review was commercial relationships
$1,300,000 or greater for JSSB and $1,600,000 or greater for Luzerne. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included
in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as Substandard, Doubtful, or
Loss on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016
Commercial and
Real Estate Mortgages
Installment Loans
(In Thousands)
Agricultural
Residential
Commercial
Construction
to Individuals
Totals
Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Mention . . . . . .
Substandard . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
140,497
$
561,440
$
277,916
$
34,493
$
43,256
$ 1,057,602
2,943
2,670
740
2,560
11,143
17,123
—
157
—
—
14,826
22,510
146,110
$
564,740
$
306,182
$
34,650
$
43,256
$ 1,094,938
68 2015
Commercial and
Real Estate Mortgages
Installment Loans
(In Thousands)
Agricultural
Residential
Commercial
Construction
to Individuals
Totals
Pass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Mention . . . . . .
Substandard . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
160,734
$
522,853
$
277,248
$
26,612
$
27,001
$ 1,014,448
1,669
1,669
823
2,507
8,625
16,666
—
212
—
—
11,117
21,054
164,072
$
526,183
$
302,539
$
26,824
$
27,001
$ 1,046,619
2014
Commercial and
Real Estate Mortgages
Installment Loans
(In Thousands)
Agricultural
Residential
Commercial
Construction
to Individuals
Totals
Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special Mention . . . . . .
Substandard . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
118,210
$
454,885
$
256,444
$
20,927
$
21,509
$
871,975
3,186
2,760
2,384
491
16,262
18,642
445
624
—
—
22,277
22,517
124,156
$
457,760
$
291,348
$
21,996
$
21,509
$
916,769
Allowance for Loan Losses
An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s
continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions,
diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-
performing loans.
The Banks' methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually
evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as
well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance. The
total of the two components represents the Banks' ALL.
Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. Allowances
are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring. Loans that
are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into two classes for evaluation. A general allowance is determined for
“Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated
for impairment.
For the general allowances historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss
amounts are modified by other qualitative factors. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a twelve quarter moving
average. However, management may adjust the moving average time frame by up to four quarters to adjust for variances in the
economic cycle. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical
charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ
from historical loss experience. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from
internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in
delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience,
ability, and depth of lending staff; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry, and/or geographic standpoint.
Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are
closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors. Management also monitors industry loss factors
by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.
Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL.
When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the
ALL.
69 Activity in the allowance is presented for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Commercial and
Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
2016
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Installment Loans
to Individual
Unallocated
Totals
Beginning Balance . . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . . .
Recoveries. . . . . . . . .
Provision . . . . . . . . . .
Ending Balance . . . . . .
$
$
1,532
(167)
62
127
1,554
$
$
5,116
(39)
15
291
5,383
$
$
4,217
(93)
8
843
4,975
$
$
160
(2)
9
11
178
$
$
243
(229)
92
310
416
$
$
776
—
—
(386)
390
$ 12,044
(530)
186
1,196
$ 12,896
(In Thousands)
Commercial and
Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
2015
Residential
Commercial Construction
Installment Loans
to Individuals
Unallocated
Totals
Beginning Balance . . . .
Charge-offs. . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . .
Provision . . . . . . . . . .
Ending Balance . . . . . .
$
$
1,124
$
3,755
$
(283)
176
515
(49)
81
1,329
$
4,205
(743)
182
573
1,532
$
5,116
$
4,217
$
786
(46)
23
(603)
160
$
$
245
(240)
64
174
243
$
$
464
—
—
312
776
$ 10,579
(1,361)
526
2,300
$ 12,044
2014
(In Thousands)
Commercial and
Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Residential
Commercial Construction
Installment Loans
to Individuals
Unallocated
Totals
Beginning Balance . . . .
Charge-offs . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . .
Provision . . . . . . . . . .
Ending Balance . . . . . .
$
$
474
$
3,917
$
(289)
18
921
(65)
15
(112)
4,079
(2,038)
—
2,164
$
741
$
—
22
23
1,124
$
3,755
$
4,205
$
786
$
139
(142)
64
184
245
$
$
794
—
—
(330)
464
$ 10,144
(2,534)
119
2,850
$ 10,579
The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers throughout north-central and north-
eastern Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 and 2015, a substantial portion
of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.
The Company has a concentration of loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015 as follows:
Owners of residential rental properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Owners of commercial rental properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16.10%
14.18%
16.21%
14.22%
2016
2015
70 The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment
and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable
to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Total ending allowance balance . . . .
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment . .
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit
quality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collectively evaluated for impairment . .
Total ending loans balance. . . . . .
(In Thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable
to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Total ending allowance balance . . . .
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
Loans acquired with deteriorated
credit quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collectively evaluated for impairment
Total ending loans balance . . . . . . . .
Commercial
and
Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
2016
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Installment
Loans to
Individuals
Unallocated
Totals
$
$
$
74
1,480
1,554
241
$
$
$
437
4,946
5,383
$
$
1,668
3,307
4,975
3,477
$ 12,258
—
145,869
$ 146,110
—
561,263
$ 564,740
—
293,924
$ 306,182
$
$
$
$
— $
— $
— $
178
178
$
416
416
$
390
390
— $
—
—
34,650
34,650
—
43,256
$ 43,256
2015
2,179
10,717
12,896
15,976
$
$
—
1,078,962
$ 1,094,938
Commercial
and
Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Installment
Loans to
Individuals
Unallocated
Totals
$
$
$
$
75
1,457
1,532
376
4,740
5,116
$
$
1,653
2,564
4,217
469
$
2,374
$ 12,487
—
163,603
$ 164,072
341
523,468
526,183
—
290,052
$ 302,539
$
$
$
$
— $
— $
— $
776
776
$
160
160
212
$
$
243
243
—
$
$
2,104
9,940
12,044
15,542
—
26,612
26,824
—
27,001
$ 27,001
341
1,030,736
$ 1,046,619
NOTE 7 - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Major classifications of premises and equipment are summarized as follows at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
2016
2015
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net premises and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
6,400
$
18,568
8,825
1,698
35,491
11,216
$
24,275
$
5,764
16,074
8,231
1,462
31,531
9,701
21,830
Depreciation and amortization related to premises and equipment for the years ended 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $1,578,000,
$1,564,000, and $1,494,000, respectively.
71 NOTE 8 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 goodwill had a gross carrying value of $17,380,000 and accumulated amortization of $276,000
resulting in a net carrying amount of $17,104,000.
The gross carrying amount of goodwill is tested for impairment in the third quarter of each fiscal year. Based on the fair value of
the reporting unit, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, there was no evidence of impairment of the
carrying amount at December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Identifiable intangibles are amortized to their estimated residual values over the expected useful lives. Such lives are also
periodically reassessed to determine if any amortization period adjustments are required. Since the acquisition, no such adjustments
were recorded. The identifiable intangible assets consist of a core deposit intangible and a trade name intangible which are being
amortized on an accelerated basis, and also book of business intangible that is being amortized on a straightline basis over the
useful life of such assets. The net carrying amount of the core deposit intangible, the trade name intangible, and the book of
business intangible at December 31, 2016 was $818,000, $58,000, and $923,000 respectively, with $1,063,000, $75,000, and
$97,000 accumulated amortization as of that date.
As of December 31, 2016, the estimated future amortization expense for the core deposit and trade name intangible was:
(In Thousands)
2017 . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . .
2025 . . . . . . .
2026 . . . . . . .
Core
Deposit
Intangible
Trade
Name
Intangible
Book of
Business
Intangible
$
$
220
185
151
117
83
48
14
—
—
—
818
$
$
15
13
11
8
6
4
1
—
—
—
58
$
$
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
5
923
NOTE 9 - TIME DEPOSITS
Time deposits of $250,000 or more totaled approximately $32,167,000 on December 31, 2016 and $28,953,000 on December 31,
2015. Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000 or more was approximately $1,305,000, $1,112,000, and $875,000, for the
years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, the scheduled maturities on time deposits of $100,000 or more are as follows:
(In Thousands)
Three months or less. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three months to six months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Six months to twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Over twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2016
19,511
11,307
12,550
63,500
$
106,868
72 Total time deposit maturities are as follows at December 31, 2016:
(In Thousands)
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2016
93,847
63,939
43,354
11,957
3,848
1,430
$
218,375
NOTE 10 - SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and primarily FHLB advances, which generally
represent overnight or less than six month borrowings. In addition to the outstanding balances noted below, the Banks also have
additional lines of credit totaling $45,247,000 available from correspondent banks other than the FHLB. The outstanding balances
and related information for short-term borrowings are summarized as follows at December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In Thousands)
Repurchase Agreements:
2016
2015
2014
Balance at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average balance outstanding during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate:
$
$
13,241
17,827
15,394
18,334
18,614
15,834
At year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paid during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.16%
0.18%
0.21%
0.21%
Overnight:
Balance at year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average balance outstanding during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average interest rate:
$
— $
24,346
3,124
28,304
42,760
23,075
$
$
13,987
18,801
16,350
0.23%
0.22%
26,831
26,831
5,992
At year end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paid during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—%
0.57%
0.43%
0.36%
0.27%
0.30%
We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and to facilitate secured short-
term funding needs. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with
the transaction. We monitor collateral levels on a continuous basis. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on
the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our
safekeeping agents.
73 The remaining contractual maturity of repurchase agreements in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015 is presented in the following tables.
(In Thousands)
Repurchase Agreements:
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-back securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total carrying value of collateral pledged. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liability recognized for repurchase agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
2016
2015
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the
Agreements
Overnight and
Continuous
Overnight and
Continuous
— $
6,684
109
5,241
8,866
20,900
13,241
$
$
3,586
8,368
1,960
8,015
2,155
24,084
18,334
NOTE 11 - LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
The following represents outstanding long-term borrowings with the FHLB by contractual maturities at December 31, 2016 and
2015:
(In Thousands)
Description
Variable
Variable
Total Variable
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Total Fixed
Total
Maturity
2017
2018
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2022
(In Thousands)
Year Ending December 31,
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Stated Interest Rate Range
2016
2015
From
To
4.22%
3.18%
3.87%
—%
0.91%
1.13%
1.55%
1.70%
2.04%
1.32%
2.21%
4.15%
3.18%
0.75%
0.90%
1.13%
1.54%
1.62%
2.04%
4.28%
3.18%
0.75%
0.97%
1.13%
1.55%
1.79%
2.04%
4.22%
3.18%
3.87%
0.75%
0.91%
1.13%
1.55%
1.70%
2.04%
1.28%
2.14%
2016
20,000
10,000
30,000
—
25,000
2,000
7,292
18,333
3,000
55,625
85,625
2015
20,000
10,000
30,000
5,000
25,000
2,000
7,292
18,333
3,000
60,625
90,625
$
$
2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amount
Weighted
Average Rate
$
$
45,000
12,000
7,292
18,333
3,000
85,625
2.38 %
2.84 %
1.55 %
1.70 %
2.04 %
2.21%
The terms of the convertible borrowings allow the FHLB to convert the interest rate to an adjustable rate based on the three month
London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) at a predetermined anniversary date of the borrowing’s origination, ranging from three
months to five years. If the FHLB converts the interest rate on one of the predetermined dates, the Bank has the ability to pay off
the debt on the conversion date and quarterly thereafter without incurring the customary pre-payment penalty.
74 The Banks maintain a credit arrangement which includes a revolving line of credit with the FHLB. Under this credit arrangement,
at December 31, 2016 JSSB has a remaining borrowing capacity of $304,044,000 and Luzerne has a remaining capacity of
$148,527,000, which are subject to annual renewal and typically incur no service charges. Under terms of a blanket agreement,
collateral for the FHLB borrowings must be secured by certain qualifying assets of each Bank which consist principally of first
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities.
In December 2012, JSSB entered in to a capital lease on a piece of land in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. The carrying amount of the
land as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $827,000. The present value of minimum lease payments at December 31, 2016 and
2015 was $373,000 and $400,000. The following is a schedule showing the future minimum lease payments under the capital
lease by years and the present value of the minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2015. The interest rate related to the
lease obligation is 2.75% and the maturity date is October 2023.
(In Thousands)
Lease Payment
Interest
Present Value of Minimum
Lease Payment
$
10
$
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
38
38
38
38
38
237
427
$
9
9
8
7
11
54
$
28
29
29
30
31
226
373
75 NOTE 12 - INCOME TAXES
The following temporary differences gave rise to the net deferred tax asset position at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Defined Pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred Loan fees and discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low income housing credit carryforward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment security accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016
2015
$
4,400
$
1,840
1,450
320
517
—
329
1,393
10,249
—
244
588
1,020
1,852
$
8,397
$
3,976
1,696
1,525
272
517
1,181
—
1,696
10,863
133
231
478
1,031
1,873
8,990
No valuation allowance was established at December 31, 2016 and 2015, because of the Company’s ability to carry back capital
losses to recover taxes paid in previous years and certain tax strategies, together with the anticipated future taxable income as
evidenced by the Company’s earning potential. The Corporation is no longer subject to federal, state, and local examinations by
tax authorities for years before 2013.
The provision or benefit for income taxes is comprised of the following for the year ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In Thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Currently payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred benefit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
3,054
1,543
4,597
$
$
3,527
209
3,736
$
$
3,680
124
3,804
A reconciliation between the expected income tax or benefit and the effective income tax rate on income before income tax
provision or benefit follows for the year ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
(In Thousands)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
2016
2015
2014
Provision at expected rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease) increase in tax resulting from:
$
5,804
34.00% $
5,996
34.00% $
6,260
34.00%
Tax-exempt income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1,092)
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax provision and rate. . . .
(312)
197
(6.40)
(1.83)
1.16
$
4,597
26.93% $
(1,492)
(737)
(31)
3,736
(8.46)
(4.17)
(0.18)
21.19% $
(1,673)
(737)
(46)
3,804
(9.09)
(4.00)
(0.25)
20.66%
76 NOTE 13 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) for all employees meeting certain age and length
of service requirements that were hired prior to January 1, 2004, at which time entrance into the Plan was frozen. The benefit
accrual for the Plan was subsequently frozen at December 31, 2014. Benefits are based primarily on years of service and the
average annual compensation during the highest five consecutive years within the final ten years of employment - up until December
31, 2014 when the benefit accrual was frozen.
The following table sets forth the obligation and funded status as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
2016
2015
Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, change in actuarial assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment to fair value of plan assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets at end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts recognized on balance sheet as:
$
$
$
$
18,947
$
775
139
(800)
—
228
19,289
$
23,450
757
(144)
(639)
(3,155)
(1,322)
18,947
14,223
$
13,906
910
750
(797)
4
25
965
(704)
31
15,090
(4,199) $
14,223
(4,724)
Total liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(4,199) $
(4,724)
Amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost:
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of:
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
6,498
$
6,267
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Plan was $19,289,000 and $18,947,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Components of Net Periodic Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (loss) as of December 31,
2016, 2015, and 2014 are as follows:
(In Thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Net periodic pension cost:
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of unrecognized net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net periodic (cost) benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
55
$
64
$
775
(989)
153
757
(983)
159
(6) $
(3) $
560
859
(1,153)
209
475
77 Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.98%
N/A
4.17%
N/A
3.83%
3.00%
2016
2015
2014
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost for years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.17%
7.00%
N/A
3.83%
7.00%
N/A
4.75%
8.00%
3.00%
2016
2015
2014
The expected long-term rate of return was estimated using market benchmarks by which the plan assets would outperform the
market value in the future, based on historical experience adjusted for changes in asset allocation and expectations for overall
lower future returns on similar investments compared to past periods.
Plan Assets
The Plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2016 and 2015 by asset category are as follows:
Asset Category
Cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hedged Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016
2015
6.54%
9.15%
64.79%
5.55%
13.97%
8.56%
10.33%
61.73%
5.03%
14.35%
100.00%
100.00%
The investment objective for the Plan is to maximize total return with tolerance for slightly above average risk, meaning the fund
is able to tolerate short-term volatility to achieve above-average returns over the long term.
Asset allocation favors equities, with target allocation of approximately 62% equity securities, 15.0% fixed income securities,
10% inflation hedges/real assets, 10% hedged strategies, and 2.5% cash. Due to volatility in the market, the target allocation is
not always desirable and asset allocations will fluctuate between the acceptable ranges. The equity portfolio’s exposure is primarily
in mid and large capitalization domestic equities with limited exposure to small capitalization and international stocks.
It is management’s intent to give the investment managers flexibility, within the overall guidelines, with respect to investment
decisions and their timing. However, certain investments require specific review and approval by management. Management is
also informed of anticipated, significant modifications of any previously approved investment, or anticipated use of derivatives
to execute investment strategies.
78 The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy detailed in Note 21 - Fair Value Measurements, the Plan’s
assets at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
2016
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - taxable fixed income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - domestic equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - international equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hedged Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets at fair value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
987
$
— $
— $
1,379
8,944
835
838
2,107
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
15,090
$
— $
— $
987
1,379
8,944
835
838
2,107
15,090
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
2015
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - taxable fixed income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - domestic equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mutual funds - international equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inflation Hedges/Real Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hedged Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets at fair value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,218
$
— $
— $
1,467
8,150
631
715
2,042
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
14,223
$
— $
— $
The following future benefit payments are expected to be paid:
(In Thousands)
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1,218
1,467
8,150
631
715
2,042
14,223
814
824
860
893
885
4,985
9,261
The company expects to contribute a minimum of $500,000 to its Pension Plan in 2017.
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company also offers a 401(k) savings plan in which eligible participating employees may elect to contribute up to a maximum
percentage allowable not to exceed the limits of Code Sections 401(k), 404, and 415. The Company may make matching
contributions equal to a discretionary percentage that is determined by the Board of Directors. Participants are at all times fully
vested in their contributions and vest over a period of five years regarding the employer contribution. Contribution expense was
approximately $215,000, $230,000, and $171,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
79 Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a deferred compensation plan whereby participating directors elect to forego directors’ fees paid in cash. Under
this plan, the Company will make payments for a ten-year period beginning at the later of age 65 or ceasing to be a director in
most cases or at death, if earlier, at which time payments would be made to their designated beneficiaries.
To fund benefits under the deferred compensation plan, the Company has acquired bank-owned life insurance policies on the lives
of the participating directors for which insurance benefits are payable to the Company. The Company incurred expenses related
to the plan of $303,000, $252,000, and $235,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Benefits
paid under the plan were approximately $85,000, $103,000, and $88,000 in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
NOTE 14 - STOCK OPTIONS
In 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan designed to help the Company attract, retain, and motivate employees
and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock may be granted as part of
the plan.
On August 27, 2015, the Company issued 38,750 stock options to a group of employees. Each option granted has a strike price
of $42.03 and is exercisable after five years following the date of the grant of such options. The options expire ten years following
the date of the grant of such options.
A summary of stock option activity is presented below:
2016
2015
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Outstanding, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34,750
$
42.03
— $
—
—
(8,250)
26,500
—
—
42.03
42.03
$
38,750
—
(4,000)
34,750
$
—
42.03
—
42.03
42.03
The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straightline basis
over the options’ vesting periods while ensuring that the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized at least equals the
value of the vested portion of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of options granted using the Black-
Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury bond with a similar term to the
expected life of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility was estimated based on the adjusted historic volatility of the
Company’s shares. The expected life was estimated to equal the contractual life of the options. The dividend yield rate was based
upon recent historical dividends paid on shares.
The following assumptions were used in determining the fair value of share options granted:
Risk-free interest rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average grant date fair value per option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2015
1.63%
31.58%
4.22%
7.51 years
3.96
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there was $14,000 and $19,000 in total share-based compensation expense,
respectively. The compensation expense is recorded as part of the non-interest expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
80
As at December 31, 2016, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options was $77,000 which is expected
to be recognized over a period of 3.66 years.
NOTE 15 - EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company maintains a Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”). The Plan is intended to encourage
employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company. The Plan allows for up to 1,000,000 shares to
be purchased by employees. The purchase price of the shares is 95% of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up
to the lesser of 15% of base compensation or $12,000 in market value annually. There were 2,125 and 2,335 shares issued under
the plan for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
NOTE 16 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and the Bank, including their immediate families and companies in which
they are principal owners (more than ten percent), are indebted to the Company. Such indebtedness was incurred in the ordinary
course of business on the same terms and at those rates prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with others.
A summary of loan activity with executive officers, directors, principal shareholders, and associates of such persons is listed below
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Beginning
Balance
New Loans
Repayments
Ending Balance
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
8,946
$
8,693
$
9,258
5,875
(8,381) $
(6,256)
9,258
8,877
Deposits from related parties held by the Banks amounted to $13,052,000 at December 31, 2016 and $13,330,000 at December 31,
2015.
NOTE 17 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The following schedule shows future minimum rental payments under operating leases with noncancellable terms in excess of
one year as of December 31, 2016:
(In Thousands)
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter. . . . . . . . . . .
$
589
599
480
463
369
1,507
4,007
The Company’s operating lease obligations represent short and long-term lease and rental payments for facilities and equipment.
Total rental expense for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 were $573,000, $591,000
and $523,000.
The Company is subject to lawsuits and claims arising out of its business. There are no such legal proceedings or claims currently
pending or threatened other than those encountered during the normal course of business.
81
NOTE 18 - OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has
in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the
same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company
may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
2016
2015
Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
263,487
$
241,936
6,515
4,786
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration
dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. The Company
evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.
Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer
to a third party. These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts. The coverage period for
these instruments is typically a one year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management. Fees
earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period. For secured letters of credit, the
collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.
NOTE 19 - CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Federal regulations require the Company and the Banks to maintain minimum amounts of capital. Specifically, each is required
to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of Common Equity Tier 1, Total, and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
and of Tier 1 capital to average total assets.
In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”) established five
capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” Should any institution fail to meet the
requirements to be considered “adequately capitalized,” it would become subject to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory
actions.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the FDIC categorized the Banks as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be classified as a well capitalized financial institution, common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risked-based,
total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 6.5%, 8%, 10%, and 5%, respectively.
The Company’s and the Banks' actual capital ratios are presented in the following tables, which shows that the Company and both
Banks met all regulatory capital requirements.
82
Consolidated Company
2016
2015
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(In Thousands)
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
$
$
125,804
12.620% $
121,665
44,849
51,078
64,782
133,393
79,732
85,961
99,665
4.500%
5.125%
6.500%
13.380% $
8.000%
8.625%
10.000%
48,722
N/A
70,377
134,067
86,617
N/A
108,272
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
125,804
12.620% $
121,665
59,799
66,028
79,732
6.000%
6.625%
8.000%
64,963
N/A
86,617
$
125,804
9.432% $
121,665
53,352
66,691
4.000%
5.000%
51,862
64,828
11.240%
4.500%
N/A
6.500%
12.380%
8.000%
N/A
10.000%
11.240%
6.000%
N/A
8.000%
9.380%
4.000%
5.000%
Jersey Shore State Bank
(In Thousands)
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
2016
2015
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
86,397
34,914
39,763
50,431
90,992
62,069
66,918
77,587
86,397
46,552
51,401
62,069
86,397
38,856
48,570
11.136% $
4.500%
5.125%
6.500%
11.728% $
8.000%
8.625%
10.000%
11.136% $
6.000%
6.625%
8.000%
8.894% $
4.000%
5.000%
82,682
34,773
N/A
50,227
92,036
61,818
N/A
77,272
82,682
46,363
N/A
61,818
82,682
38,175
47,719
10.700%
4.500%
N/A
6.500%
11.910%
8.000%
N/A
10.000%
10.700%
6.000%
N/A
8.000%
8.660%
4.000%
5.000%
83 Luzerne Bank
(In Thousands)
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer. . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For Capital Adequacy Purposes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
To Be Well Capitalized. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
NOTE 20 - REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS
2016
2015
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
31,102
13,769
15,682
19,889
33,589
24,479
26,391
30,599
31,102
18,359
20,272
24,479
31,102
14,576
18,220
10.165% $
4.500%
5.125%
6.500%
10.977% $
8.000%
8.625%
10.000%
10.165% $
6.000%
6.625%
8.000%
8.535% $
4.000%
5.000%
30,549
12,901
N/A
18,635
33,274
22,935
N/A
28,669
30,549
17,201
N/A
22,935
30,549
13,725
17,157
10.660%
4.500%
N/A
6.500%
11.610%
8.000%
N/A
10.000%
10.660%
6.000%
N/A
8.000%
8.900%
4.000%
5.000%
The Pennsylvania Banking Code restricts the availability of capital funds for payment of dividends by all state-chartered banks.
Accordingly, at December 31, 2016, the balance in the additional paid in capital account totaling $11,657,000 for JSSB and
$42,214,000 for Luzerne Bank is unavailable for dividends.
The Banks are subject to regulatory restrictions, which limit the ability to loan funds to Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. At December 31,
2016, the regulatory lending limit amounted to approximately $16,769,000.
Cash and Due from Banks
Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank had no reserve requirements by the district Federal Reserve Bank at December 31,
2016 or 2015; however, if they did they would be reported with cash and due from banks. The required reserves are computed
by applying prescribed ratios to the classes of average deposit balances. These are held in the form of cash on hand and a balance
maintained directly with the Federal Reserve Bank.
84 NOTE 21 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in
measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels of pricing observations are as follows:
Level I:
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level II:
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as
of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available
but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which
can be directly observed.
Level III:
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers
are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31,
2016 and 2015, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
2016
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities, trading:
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets measured on a recurring basis . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
10,535
1,483
58
9,313
109
60,934
51,118
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,313
109
60,934
51,118
10,535
1,483
58
$
12,076
$
121,474
$
— $
133,550
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
2015
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset-backed securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and political securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment securities, trading:
Financial institution equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets measured on a recurring basis . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
3,549
$
— $
—
—
—
—
11,483
4,849
73
10,009
1,940
86,555
57,772
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,549
10,009
1,940
86,555
57,772
11,483
4,849
73
$
16,405
$
159,825
$
— $
176,230
85 The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31,
2016 and 2015, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
2016
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis. . . . . . . . .
(In Thousands)
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis. . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
— $
—
— $
— $
13,797
—
839
— $
14,636
Level I
Level II
Level III
2015
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
13,779
1,696
15,475
$
$
$
$
13,797
839
14,636
Total
13,779
1,696
15,475
The following table provides a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items
valued utilizing level III techniques as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
2016
(In Thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . .
$ 5,304
Discounted cash flow
Temporary reduction in
payment amount
0 to (70)%
Probability of default
—%
Other real estate owned . .
$
839 Appraisal of collateral (1)
8,493
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal adjustments (1)
0 to (20)%
(20)%
(15)%
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
2015
(In Thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . .
$ 5,696 Discounted cash flow
Temporary reduction in
payment amount
0 to (70)%
Probability of default
—%
Other real estate owned . .
$ 1,696 Appraisal of collateral (1)
8,083 Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal adjustments (1)
0 to (20)%
(17)%
(15)%
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation
expenses.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted
cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default. Significant increases
(decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements. The probability of default
is 0% for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using
the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of
collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative
86 factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value
measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of
collateral valuation technique.
NOTE 22 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments. Fair values are made at a specific point in time,
based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These fair values do not reflect any premium
or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in
trading or sales activities. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair values
are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various
financial instruments, and other factors. These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair
values.
Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category
of financial instruments. The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other
financial instruments.
As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the
Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, the fair value of financial instruments would not represent the
full market value of the Company.
The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In Thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . .
Investment securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . .
Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest-bearing deposits. . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . .
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level I)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level II)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level III)
$
43,671
$
43,671
$
43,671
$
— $
133,492
133,492
58
1,953
58
1,953
1,080,785
1,088,122
27,332
3,672
27,332
3,672
12,018
58
1,953
—
27,332
3,672
121,474
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,088,122
—
—
$
791,937
$
789,401
$
571,768
$
— $
217,633
303,277
303,277
13,241
85,998
455
13,241
86,353
455
303,277
13,241
—
455
—
—
—
—
—
—
86,353
—
87 (In Thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . .
Investment securities:
Available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . .
Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest-bearing deposits. . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . .
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level I)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level II)
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level III)
$
22,796
$
22,796
$
22,796
$
— $
176,157
176,157
16,332
159,825
73
757
73
757
1,033,163
1,045,140
26,667
3,686
26,667
3,686
73
757
—
26,667
3,686
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,045,140
—
—
$
751,797
$
729,685
$
509,206
$
— $
220,479
280,083
280,083
46,638
91,025
426
46,638
91,783
426
280,083
46,638
—
426
—
—
—
—
—
—
91,783
—
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Trading Securities, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings,
and Accrued Interest Payable:
The fair value is equal to the carrying value.
Investment Securities:
The fair value of investment securities available for sale is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price
is available, fair value is determined by using the quoted market price for similar securities. Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal
to the carrying value.
Loans:
Fair values are determined for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as
commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and other consumer. Each loan category is
further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using market
discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s
historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current
economic and lending conditions.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals. If appraisals are not available, estimated
cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding
credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower
information.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance:
The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.
88 Deposits:
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market
accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The fair value of certificates of deposit
is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
The fair values above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared
to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.
Long Term Borrowings:
The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:
There is no material difference between the notional amount and the fair value of off-balance sheet items at December 31, 2016
and 2015. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 17.
89 NOTE 23 - PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed financial information for Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. follows:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, DECEMBER 31,
(In Thousands)
ASSETS:
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in subsidiaries:
$
Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-bank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liability and shareholders’ equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2016
2015
578
$
263
129,421
127,126
8,037
373
138,409
160
138,249
138,409
$
$
$
8,332
705
136,426
147
136,279
136,426
(In Thousands)
Operating income:
2016
2015
2014
Dividends from subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
10,007
$
11,367
$
10,080
—
3,128
(660)
12,475
11,346
$
$
—
3,167
(636)
13,898
11,766
$
$
3
5,261
(736)
14,608
17,835
$
$
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(In Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of treasury stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH, END OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2016
2015
2014
$
12,475
$
13,898
$
14,608
(3,128)
344
9,691
(8,903)
101
(574)
(9,376)
315
263
578
(3,167)
(313)
10,418
(8,967)
116
(2,603)
(11,454)
(1,036)
1,299
(5,261)
(50)
9,297
(9,055)
118
(747)
(9,684)
(387)
1,686
$
263
$
1,299
90 NOTE 24 - CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
For the Three Months Ended
2016
March 31,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
Interest income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings per share - basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
11,726
$
11,669
$
11,660
$
1,352
10,374
350
2,522
475
9,061
3,960
882
3,078
0.65
$
$
1,381
10,288
258
2,686
492
8,666
4,542
1,152
3,390
0.72
$
$
1,413
10,247
258
2,821
261
8,739
4,332
1,273
3,059
0.65
$
$
$
$
11,758
1,421
10,337
330
2,415
441
8,625
4,238
1,290
2,948
0.62
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
For the Three Months Ended
2015
March 31,
June 30,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
Interest income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains . . . . . . . .
Securities gains, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings per share - basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
11,397
$
11,529
$
11,523
$
1,286
10,111
700
2,599
661
8,468
4,203
848
3,355
0.70
$
$
1,307
10,222
600
2,535
522
8,421
4,258
825
3,433
0.72
$
$
1,289
10,234
520
2,644
493
8,530
4,321
957
3,364
0.71
$
$
$
$
11,675
1,337
10,338
480
2,417
894
8,317
4,852
1,106
3,746
0.79
ITEM 9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President
and Chief Executive Officer along with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness as
of December 31, 2016 of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined
under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief
Executive Officer along with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2016 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is
91 designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard
No. 2), or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by management or
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
Management’s assessment did not identify any material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission ("COSO") in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by COSO in May 2013. Because there were no material
weaknesses discovered, management believes that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and, as part of the audit, has issued a report, which appears below, on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
Date: March 7, 2017
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
/s/ Brian L. Knepp
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
92 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
Williamsport, Pennsylvania
We have audited Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,
based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in 2013. Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded, as necessary, to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO in 2013.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated March 10, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion.
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2017
93 ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information appearing under the captions “The Board of Directors and its Committees,” “Election of Directors,” “Information
as to Nominees and Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Principal Officers of the
Corporation,” and “Certain Transactions” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of
shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information appearing under the captions “Compensation of Directors," “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation
Committee Report,” “Executive Compensation,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards,” “Option Exercises
and Stock Vested,” “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation,” “Retirement Plan,” and “Potential Post-Employment Payments” in
the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information appearing under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information appearing under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Certain Transactions” in the Proxy Statement is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions, “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” “Other
Fees,” and “Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services” is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)1. Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements and reports are set forth in Item 8:
Report of Independent Auditors
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Consolidated Statement of Income
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
94 2.
Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules are omitted because the required information is either not applicable, not required or is
shown in the respective financial statements or in the notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits:
(3) (i)
(3) (ii)
(10) (i)
(10) (ii)
(10) (iii)
(10) (iv)
(10) (v)
(10) (vi)
(21)
(23)
(31) (i)
(31) (ii)
(32) (i)
(32) (ii)
Exhibit 101
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of
the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
Form of First Amendment to the Jersey Shore State Bank Amendment and Restatement of the Director Fee
Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2006).
Consulting Agreement, dated July 18, 2005 between Hubert A. Valencik and Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18,
2005).
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, among Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.,
Jersey Shore State Bank and Brian L. Knepp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2014).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2014, among Penns Woods
Bancorp, Inc., Jersey Shore State Bank and Richard A. Grafmyre (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2014).*
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, among Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Jersey Shore State
Bank and Aron M. Carter*
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, among Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Jersey Shore State
Bank and Michelle M. Karas*
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants.
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015;
(ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014; (iii) the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014;
(iv) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and
2014; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. As provided in
Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise
subject to liability under those sections.
* Denotes compensatory plan or arrangement.
95 EXHIBIT INDEX
(10) (v)
(10) (vi)
(21)
(23)
(31) (i)
(31) (ii)
(32) (i)
(32) (ii)
Exhibit 101
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, among Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Jersey Shore State Bank
and Aron M. Carter*
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, among Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Jersey Shore State Bank
and Michelle M. Karas*
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants.
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015;
(ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014; (iii) the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014;
(iv) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014;
and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. As provided in Rule 406T
of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability
under those sections.
96 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
March 7, 2017
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
President and Chief Executive Officer
97 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
Richard A. Grafmyre, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Brian L. Knepp
Brian L. Knepp, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
/s/ R. Edward Nestlerode, Jr.
R. Edward Nestlerode, Jr., Chairman of the Board
/s/ Daniel K. Brewer
Daniel K. Brewer, Director
/s/ Michael J. Casale, Jr.
Michael J. Casale, Jr., Director
/s/ William J. Edwards
William J. Edwards, Director
/s/ James M. Furey, II
James M. Furey, II, Director
/s/ D. Michael Hawbaker
D. Michael Hawbaker, Director
/s/ Leroy H. Keiler, III
Leroy H. Keiler, III, Director
/s/ Joseph E. Kluger
Joseph E. Kluger, Director
/s/ John G. Nackley
John G. Nackley, Director
/s/ Jill F. Schwartz
Jill F. Schwartz, Director
/s/ William H. Rockey
William H. Rockey, Director
/s/ Hubert A. Valencik
Hubert A. Valencik, Director
/s/ Ronald A. Walko
Ronald A. Walko, Director
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
March 7, 2017
98 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
Daniel K. Brewer. . . . . . . . . . . . Principal & Owner, Brewer & Company, LLC
Michael J. Casale, Jr.. . . . . . . . . Principal, Michael J. Casale, Jr. Esq., LLC
William J. Edwards . . . . . . . . . . President & Owner of JEB Environmental Technologies, Inc.
James M. Furey, II. . . . . . . . . . . President & Owner of Eastern Wood Products
Richard A. Grafmyre . . . . . . . . . President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company
D. Michael Hawbaker . . . . . . . . Executive Vice President of Glenn O. Hawbaker, Inc.
Leroy H. Keiler, III . . . . . . . . . . Leroy H. Keiler, III, Attorney at Law
Joseph E. Kluger . . . . . . . . . . . . Chairman of the Board of Luzerne, Managing Principal of Hourigan, Kluger &
Quinn P.C.
Brian L. Knepp . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer of the Company
John G. Nackley . . . . . . . . . . . . President and CEO of InterMetro Industries Corporation
R. Edward Nestlerode, Jr. . . . . . Chairman of the Board of the Company, Vice President and Chief Executive
Officer of Nestlerode Contracting Co., Inc.
William H. Rockey . . . . . . . . . . Retired; Former Senior Vice President of the Company & JSSB; Former
President of First National Bank of Spring Mills
Jill F. Schwartz . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Partner of Wyoming Weavers; President of Fortune Fabrics, Inc.; Owner
of Gosh Yarn It!
Hubert A. Valencik . . . . . . . . . . Chairman of the Board of JSSB, Retired; Former Senior Vice President & Chief
Operations Officer of JSSB; Former Senior Vice President of the Company
Ronald A. Walko . . . . . . . . . . . . Retired; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
JSSB
Jersey Shore State Bank
Daniel K. Brewer. . . . . . . . . . . . Principal & Owner, Brewer & Company, LLC
Michael J. Casale, Jr.. . . . . . . . . Principal, Michael J. Casale, Jr. Esq., LLC
William J. Edwards . . . . . . . . . . President & Owner of JEB Environmental Technologies, Inc.
James M. Furey, II. . . . . . . . . . . President & Owner of Eastern Wood Products
Richard A. Grafmyre . . . . . . . . . President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company
D. Michael Hawbaker . . . . . . . . Executive Vice President of Glenn O. Hawbaker, Inc.
Leroy H. Keiler, III . . . . . . . . . . Leroy H. Keiler, III, Attorney at Law
Cameron W. Kephart. . . . . . . . . Executive Vice President, Susquehanna Transit Company
Brian L. Knepp . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer of the Company
R. Edward Nestlerode, Jr. . . . . . Chairman of the Board of the Company, Vice President and Chief Executive
Officer of Nestlerode Contracting Co., Inc.
William H. Rockey . . . . . . . . . . Retired; Former Senior Vice President of the Company & JSSB; Former
President of First National Bank of Spring Mills
Hubert A. Valencik . . . . . . . . . . Chairman of the Board of JSSB, Retired; Former Senior Vice President & Chief
Operations Officer of JSSB; Former Senior Vice President of the Company
Ronald A. Walko . . . . . . . . . . . . Retired; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
JSSB
99 Luzerne Bank
Patricia Finan Castellano ............ Health Care Consultant
James F. Clemente ...................... Managing Partner, Snyder & Clemente
Robert G. Edgerton..................... President & Chief Executive Officer of Luzerne
Richard A. Grafmyre .................. President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Joseph E. Kluger ........................ Chairman of the Board of Luzerne, Managing Principal of Hourigan, Kluger &
Quinn P.C.
Gary F. Lamont ........................... Principal, Conyngham Pass Co.
Robert G. Lawrence ................... Partner, Lawrence & Cable, LLP
John G. Nackley ......................... President and CEO of InterMetro Industries Corporation
Jill F. Schwartz ........................... Senior Partner of Wyoming Weavers; President of Fortune Fabrics, Inc.; Owner
Angelo C. Terrana, Jr. ................. Principal, Terrana Law, P.C.
of Gosh Yarn It!
100
Jersey Shore State Bank Locations
& Luzerne Bank Locations
CLINTON COUNTY
LYCOMING COUNTY
• MONTOURSVILLE
LOYALSOCK •
• WILLIAMSPORT
• DUBOISTOWN
• MONTGOMERY
Y
DALLAS
•
LAKE •
• WYOMING
• SWOYERSVILLE
LUZERNE • PLAINS
•
WILKES-BARRE
JERSEY
SHORE
LOCK HAVEN
•
• MILL HALL
CENTRE COUNTY
• ZION
• SPRING MILLS
• CENTRE HALL
• STATE COLLEGE
LEWISBURG
•
• DANVILLE
UNION COUNTY
MONTOUR COUNTY
• HAZLE TWP
LUZERNE COUNTY
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
P.O. Box 967
300 Market Street
Williamsport, PA 17703-0967