3
1
0
2
T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
S
R
E
T
N
E
C
A
Z
A
L
P
This annual report is not intended for Dutch
statutory fi ling purposes.
The Company is required to fi le an annual
report containing consolidated and Company
fi nancial statements prepared in accordance
with the Netherlands Civil Code – such a report
will be submitted in due course to the Dutch
authorities and will be available for
shareholders’ inspection at the Company’s
offi ces in Amsterdam.
Contents
Overview
1 Who we are
2 2013 highlights
4 Our strategy
6 Feature developments
8 Debt restructuring plan
9 Competitive strengths
12 Our markets
13 Our portfolio at a glance
14 Development focus
16 Current portfolio
Business review
30 President and Chief Executive Offi cer’s statement
33 Operational review
40 Financial review
42 Valuation summary by Cushman and Wakefi eld
Management and governance
43 Management structure
44 Board of Directors and Senior management
46 Directors’ report
50 Corporate governance
57 Risk management
66 Remuneration report
68 Statement of the directors
Financial statements
70 Independent auditors’ report
71 Consolidated statement of fi nancial position
72 Consolidated statement of profi t or loss
73 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
74 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
75 Consolidated statement of cash fl ows
77 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements
Additional information
154 Company’s offi ces
155 Advisors
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Who we are
We are a leading Central and Eastern
European property developer focusing on
western-style shopping and entertainment
centers, with a diversifi ed platform of
operations in India.
Latvia
the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange in Israel and on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market in the United States. (For more information visit
www.elbitimaging.com.)
The Plaza Centers Group is a leading emerging markets developer
The Group has been present in real estate development in emerging
of shopping and entertainment centers, focusing on developing new
markets for more than 18 years, initially pursuing shopping
centers and, where there is signifi cant redevelopment potential,
and entertainment center development projects in Hungary and
redeveloping existing centers, in both capital cities and important
subsequently expanding into Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania,
regional centers. The Group has been present in the Central and
Latvia, Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and India. To date, the Group has
Eastern Europe region (“CEE”) since 1996 and was the fi rst to
developed and let 33 shopping and entertainment centers in the CEE
develop western-style shopping and entertainment centers in
region and India, of which 26 were sold with an aggregate gross
Hungary. The Group has pioneered this concept throughout the
value of circa €1.16 billion. 21 of these centers were acquired by
CEE whilst building a strong track record of successfully developing,
Klépierre, a leading player in the continental European shopping
letting and selling shopping and entertainment centers. Since 2006,
center property market, which owns circa 250 shopping centers and
the Group has extended its area of operations beyond the CEE into
manages circa 320 shopping centers in 13 countries in continental
India. In 2012, Plaza identifi ed, with its joint venture partners, a
Europe. Four additional shopping and entertainment centers were
window of opportunity for investment in the US as result of the
sold to the Dawnay Day Group, one of the UK’s leading institutional
dislocation of the property market, specifi cally within the retail
property investors at that time. One shopping center was sold
sector. In 2010, taking advantage of its qualities and experience
in 2007 to Active Asset Investment Management (“aAIM”), a UK
in identifying opportunities, managing and exiting assets, gained
commercial property investment group. The transaction had a
over the years, the Group completed another signifi cant sale of
completion value totaling approximately €387 million, representing
49 US-based assets, mainly to a joint venture between Blackstone
circa 20% of all real estate transactions completed in Hungary
Real Estate and DDR Corp. in a transaction valued at
in 2007.
USD 1.47 billion, which refl ects an ROE for the Group of
nearly 50% in a period of little over 18 months.
Since 1 November 2006, Plaza Centers N.V.’s shares have been
traded on the main board of the London Stock Exchange under the
Throughout 2013, Plaza made considerable operational
ticker “PLAZ”. From 19 October 2007, Plaza Centers N.V.’s shares
improvements across its portfolio. These are clearly refl ected in the
are also traded on the main list of the Warsaw Stock Exchange under
increase in occupancy levels from 89% at the end of 2012 to 93%
the ticker “PLZ”, making it the fi rst property company to achieve this
as at the reporting date. At the same time, Plaza continued to make
dual listing.
good progress in the ongoing process of repositioning its business
model, ensuring its continued focus on deleveraging the balance
Due to the ongoing challenging market conditions and the
sheet and reallocating capital, primarily through the disposal of
upcoming debt maturities, on 18 November 2013 Plaza announced
completed or non-core assets and reinvestment into its core yielding
a debt restructuring plan in order to better structure its debts.
assets. This was best illustrated by the €61 million raised during
Throughout the restructuring process, the Company intends to
the year through the sale of fi ve assets, the remaining proceeds
continue its business activities as normal. The original date of the
from the dissolution of the US holding entity and successful asset
creditors’ voting, scheduled for 17 April 2014, has been postponed
management initiatives at Torun´ Plaza, Suwałki Plaza, Kragujevac
to 26 June 2014 due to technicalities involved in formally completing
Plaza and Riga Plaza.
the arrangement. Despite this, Plaza remains confi dent that it should
be able to conclude its restructuring process successfully in Q3
The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Elbit Imaging Ltd. (“EI”),
2014. For more details on the restructuring process, please refer to
an Israeli public company whose shares are registered for trade on
the Company’s website under Investor relations / Debt restructuring.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
1
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
2013 highlights
Continued improvement of operations,
disposal of non-core assets and
good progress with the restructuring
process.
Total assets
2013: €586 million
2012: €886 million restated
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Net Asset Value (NAV)
2013: €274 million
2012: €459 million
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1500
1200
900
600
300
0
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Consolidated cash position*
2013: €33.7 million
2012: €66.6 million
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Profi t (loss) after tax:
2013: €(218) million
2012: €(86) million
2007
2008
2010
2011
2009
2012
300
270
240
210
180
150
120
90
60
30
0
250
200
150
100
50
0
* Including short-term and long-term liquid fi nancial instruments.
2013
2
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Asset and operational highlights
Financial highlights
• In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily
• Reduction in total assets to €586 million (31 December 2012:
holds interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra.
€886 million restated – as a result of changes in the accounting
The successful transaction valued assets owned by the vehicle
presentation of joint venture Special Purpose Vehicles (‘SPVs’) (due
collectively at €33.4 million and, as a result, Plaza received gross
to changes in IFRS)), and primarily due to impairment of trading
proceeds of circa €16.7 million.
properties and equity accounted investees as well as debt repayments.
- Book value of the Company’s trading properties reduced
• In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its
by 19% over the year, or by €117 million, primarily due to
stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project
impairments recorded.
(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third
district of Prague. The transaction valued the asset at circa €11.1
• Rental income slightly increased to €23.7 million (31 December
million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other
2012: €23.1 million), due to the improvement in the performance
balance sheet adjustments, Plaza received net proceeds of circa
of the CEE shopping centers. The rental income performance
€7.6 million in cash.
would have been even stronger, had there not been a loss of
income caused by a fi re incident in India.
• On 31 October 2013, a consortium of shareholders of Dream
Island, in which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale
• Net Asset Value decreased by 40% to €274 million (31 December
of its Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State
2012: €459 million) primarily as a result of impairment of assets,
for circa €16.5 million (HUF 5 billion). The proceeds of the
mainly in Serbia, Romania and India.
transaction were used by the Consortium to repay a proportion
- Net Asset Value per share of £0.79 (31 December 2012: £1.26),
of the securitised related bank debt held against the asset. As
a decline of 37%, attributable mainly to the abovementioned
a result of a previous non-cash, market driven write-down, no
impairments.
accounting loss was incurred.
• Loss for the year of €218 million (31 December 2012: Loss of
• On 8 November 2013, the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary
€86 million), stemming from a non-cash €186 million impairment
signed a new €59.3 million investment loan with a consortium
of trading properties, equity accounted investees, investment
comprising two banks for its shopping and entertainment
property and pre-payments (31 December 2012: €83.7 million
center in Riga, Latvia. The new facility has duration of four
of impairments), and an overall net fi nance cost of €39 million
years and therefore substantially lengthens the duration of the
compared to a net fi nance cost of €17 million in 2012. Impairment
debt compared to the previous loan facility, which was due for
of real estate assets in the fourth quarter of 2013 totalled circa
repayment on 30 June 2014.
€43 million.
- Basic and diluted loss per share of €0.73 (31 December 2012:
• On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an
loss per share of €0.29).
agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and
offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction
• Consolidated cash position at year end (including restricted
of certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at
bank deposits, short-term deposits and held for trading fi nancial
circa €40 million, the asset’s current book value. Following the
assets) of €33.7 million (31 December 2012: €65.8 million) and
repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza expects to
current cash position of circa €36 million (€7 million restricted).
generate aggregate cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling
circa €18 million, before taxes and transaction costs, which
• Gearing increased to 64% (31 December 2012: 50%) as a result
should be paid in instalments over the coming two years.
of impairment losses and fi nance costs incurred during the year.
• Plaza’s 70% subsidiary reached an agreement in December 2013
Key highlights since the period end
to sell its 50% equity stake (together with the other 50% joint
venture partner) in the Új Udvar shopping mall in Budapest,
Hungary. As a result of the transaction, proceeds of €2.35 million
in cash were received by Plaza for its share in the asset.
• Improved occupancy levels achieved across the Company’s
existing shopping and entertainment centers in the CEE, with the
overall portfolio occupancy rate increasing from 89% in 2012 to
93% as at the reporting date.
Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring
programme made on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good
progress towards resolving its liquidity situation. The market
prices of the Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the
restructuring plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are
moving forward.
The original date of the creditors’ voting, scheduled for 17 April
2014, has been postponed to 26 June 2014 due to technicalities
involved in formally completing the arrangement. For more details
on the court decision, please refer to the Company’s website under
Investor relations / Debt restructuring. Despite this, Plaza remains
confi dent that it should be able to conclude its restructuring process
successfully in Q3 2014.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
3
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Our
strategy
Plaza will continue in its efforts
to best position the Company against
the ongoing economic and market
uncertainty by striving to fi nd the
optimal blend of progressing with
limited and targeted development
programme into the strongest
economies of the CEE whilst reducing
its levels of gearing. Plaza’s cautious
but opportunistic approach is set to
unlock signifi cant value on behalf of
its shareholders.
4
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
plaza centers/overview
our strategy
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Develop
Develop modern, western-style shopping and entertainment centers
in capital and regional cities, primarily in CEE and India.
Acquire
5 Continue to reallocate capital to pay debts following the sale of a
number of completed and non-core assets and invest in the core
yielding assets in our portfolio.
Development criteria
Selection of target countries
Acquire operating shopping centers that show signifi cant
Our primary focus is on countries in emerging markets and we
redevelopment or growth potential.
Flexibility
Depending on market yields, we either pre-sell or hold and manage
our assets until the exit yields are suffi ciently attractive.
are currently present in CEE and India. In order to determine a
favorable investment climate, we take into account country risk,
GDP per capita and economic growth, ratio of retail sales per capita,
political stability, sophistication of banking systems, land ownership
restrictions, ease of obtaining building and operating permits, busi-
ness risks, existing competition and market saturation levels.
Maintain liquidity and debt management
Site evaluation
In order to resolve its liquidity situation, the Company has fi led
We look to develop our fi rst project in the capital city of a new country,
with the Dutch Court a restructuring plan proposed to its creditors.
and thereafter in regional cities with a minimum catchment area of
The restructuring plan proposes a deferral of the obligations of the
50,000 residents. Site evaluation includes site area, catchment area,
Company for a period of three to four years, or shorter if cash fl ow
local zoning and town planning schemes, proximity to transportation
permits, without requiring the bondholders to take a loss on the
and vehicular routes and legal issues. A carefully structured,
par value of their investments. During the restructuring process
internally developed evaluation process is in place involving each of
creditors are subject to a moratorium.
the relevant disciplines (economics, engineering, marketing, etc.).
Plaza continues to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during
the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the
period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to
64% in 2013.
Project development
Once we have approved a site, we manage its development from
inception to completion, incorporating engineering, marketing,
fi nancial and legal stages, designs, architects, market forecasts and
Successful efforts to sign refi nancing agreements for constructing
feasibility studies.
and/or investment loans and to extend loan duration were made in 2013.
Emerging markets
Objectives
1 Concentrate on existing projects and target new development
opportunities in the strongest countries in CEE, as well as in
India, that have the potential to generate returns of 40% to 60%
on equity invested.
Plaza Centers has a strong track record in developing real estate
projects such as shopping and entertainment centers in emerging
markets. The Group has been present in the CEE region since 1996,
and was a pioneer in bringing western-style shopping malls to
Hungary. The concept was continued throughout the CEE and is now
being exported to India, whilst other development and investment
2 Fund 60% to 75% of total project construction costs through
opportunities in additional countries are being explored further.
competitively priced bank fi nance.
3 Limited commencement of construction for projects meeting the
two major criteria as follows:
- intensive demand from tenants
- backed by external bank fi nancing to ensure minimal equity
investment.
The Company has had considerable success in capitalizing on the
fantastic opportunities that emerging markets have offered.
We carefully investigate the benefi ts and challenges inherent in
every proposed project, adhering to our development criteria.
The Company is currently focusing its development efforts on
4 Deliver considerable progress at the operational level of the
Poland, Serbia, Romania and India. Plaza will continue to advance
business through intensive asset management initiatives, such
remaining projects within its land bank, through obtaining planning
as attracting signifi cant anchor tenants to our assets.
consents and construction permits.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
5
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Feature
developments
Since foundation, the Group has
developed and let 32 shopping and
entertainment centers in the CEE
region and one in India of which 26
were sold with an aggregate gross
value of €1.16 billion, resulting in a
gain of €360 million.
Plaza has averaged nearly two new shopping centers per
year in the last 18 years and currently owns and manages
seven shopping and entertainment centers. Improved
occupancy levels achieved across the Company’s existing
shopping and entertainment centers, with the overall
portfolio occupancy rate increasing from 89% in 2012
to more than 93% as at the reporting date.
Liberec Plaza
(Czech Republic)
Opened March 2009
Plaza share 100%
17,000m2
GLA
Plaza continues to own and manage Liberec Plaza shopping and entertainment
center. During 2013, the turnover of the mall improved by 10%, whilst occupancy
increased from 80% in 2012 to 86%, including tenants such as Billa, Sephora,
Dracik and Dinopark. Additionally, a lease agreement was recently signed with
Sports Direct, which has opened the store in April 2014.
Riga Plaza
(Latvia)
Opened March 2009
Plaza share 50%
Zgorzelec Plaza
(Poland)
Opened March 2010
Plaza share 100%
49,000m2
GLA
13,000m2
GLA
Riga Plaza shopping and entertainment center is located on the western bank
of the Daugava river by the Sala Bridge. The two-fl oor mall includes an eight-
screen multiplex cinema and 2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. The center continues to
deliver signifi cant operational improvements, seeing occupancy levels increase
to 97% following the lease agreement signed wiht H&M for a 2,700m2 store
which was opened in April 2014. There are ongoing discussions with a
number of potential occupiers for the remaining space, therefore it is expected
that the mall will be fully let by the end of 2014. Also footfall and turnover
improved throughout the year by 7% and 14% respectively.
Zgorzelec Plaza, which has the only cinema in the area, achieved a signifi cant
operational improvement throughout the year and continues to perform in
line with expectations. The occupancy rate of the shopping and entertainment
center was improved from 89% in 2012 to 91% as at the reporting date. In
addition, footfall in the mall increased by 29% compared to 2012 and the
center achieved a 58% growth in turnover on a year-to-year basis.
6
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Suwałki Plaza
(Poland)
Opened May 2010
Plaza share 100%
Torun´ Plaza
(Poland)
Opened November 2011
Plaza share 100%
20,000m2
GLA
40,000m2
GLA
Suwałki Plaza, the three-fl oor shopping and entertainment center which
includes a three-screen cinema and a bowling center as well, is 91% let to
international and local tenants such as H&M, Rossmann, New Yorker, KappAhl
and Cinema Lumière, and continues to perform well. Turnover of the center
increased by 10% compared to 2012.
Torun´ Plaza represents Plaza’s tenth completed center in Poland. The center is
89% let to premium international and local brands such as Cinema City, H&M,
C&A, KappAhl, Zara, Bershka, Stradivarius, Pull & Bear and Massimo Dutti,
in addition TK Maxx, an anchor retailer, which opened a 2,700m2 store in
March 2014.
Kragujevac Plaza
(Serbia)
Opened March 2012
Plaza share 100%
Koregaon Park Plaza
(India)
Opened March 2012
Plaza share 100%
22,000m2
GLA
41,000m2
GLA
Plaza opened its fi rst Serbian shopping and entertainment center in
Kragujevac, which is the fi rst western-style mall to be built outside the capital,
Belgrade. As at the reporting date, the center is fully let to remarkable tenants,
including Nike, Adidas, Aldo, New Yorker, Deichmann, TerraNova, Fashion
and Friends, H&O, Oviesse, Fox, Chicco and Home Center. The center shows
signifi cant improvements both in terms of footfall, which increased by 15%,
and turnover, which increased by 17% compared to 2012, demonstrating
Plaza’s ability to capitalize on opportunities in new markets.
In November 2013, the Group reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park
Plaza, the Company’s fi rst completed entertainment and shopping center in
India, subject to the fulfi lment of certain closing conditions.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
7
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Debt
restructuring
plan
Suspension of payment procedure
On 18 November 2013, the Company applied for suspension of
payments proceedings under Dutch law and simultaneously fi led a
draft restructuring plan (the “restructuring plan” or “plan”) with the
district court of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
On 18 November 2013, the Court granted the Company a provisional
suspension of payments, appointing an administrator and a
supervisory judge. The Court determined that no hearing should
take place for deciding on the granting of defi nitive suspension of
payments, order that, instead, a creditors meeting will take place to
vote on the restructuring plan on 26 June 2014 and determined that
the Company’s creditors can fi le their claims for voting purposes
before 12 June 2014.
Background
The Company has been faced with challenging market conditions
for some years. Adverse market conditions have primarily been
caused by the underlying economic situation in many of the
countries in which the Company operates, combined with the lack
of transactional liquidity in the investment markets for assets such
as those owned by the Company and the ongoing lack of traditional
bank fi nancing available to real estate developers and investors.
Although Board and senior management team have made
considerable progress in repositioning the Company’s business
model to ensure that it is focused on the deleveraging of its balance
sheet and the recycling of capital, primarily through the disposal
of its non-core assets, the Company has not been able to complete
these transactions within a timeframe that would enable it to meet
its short-term obligations towards the holders of Series A Notes,
the holders of Series B Notes, the Polish bondholders and other
unsecured creditors. As a result, by the end of 2013, the Company
was faced with signifi cant liquidity problems. Notwithstanding the
liquidity issues, the Company continues to have a strong balance
sheet, with a signifi cant positive current net asset value, and owns
assets and development opportunities that offer signifi cant potential
to deliver returns over the medium to long-term. Accordingly, the
Board believes that, on a going concern basis, the Company will
retain substantial value for its stakeholders and will be able to repay
its creditors in full, while the Board is certain that a forced liquidation
would cause creditors and shareholders to incur signifi cant losses.
Purpose and summary
The plan is addressed to all ordinary unsecured creditors of the
Company. The purpose of the restructuring plan is to provide the
Company with the ability to preserve value for its creditors by giving it
time to resolve its liquidity situation and thereby avoiding a liquidation
scenario. This will primarily be achieved through a deferral of payment
obligations. Apart from the proposed payment deferral, the terms of the
restructuring plan do not require bondholders to take a loss on the par
value of their outstanding exposures.
A general, high-level and non-exhaustive brief summary of the
material agreed commercial terms are listed below:
• The plan shall be contingent upon the injection of a fresh €20
million into the Company (“Equity Contribution”), and will become
effective only once the placing of the Equity Contribution shall
have been occurred.
• The Company shall issue to holders of unsecured debt (i.e.,
outstanding debt under the Israeli Series A and B Notes and the
Polish Notes) (“Unsecured Debt”) 13.5% of the Company’s shares
(post the Equity Contribution) for no consideration. Such issuance
of shares will be distributed among the holders of Unsecured
Debt pro rata to the relative share of each relevant creditor in the
Deferred Debt (“Deferred Debt Ratio”).
• All principal payments due during the years 2013-2015 of any
Unsecured Debt (“Deferred Debt”) shall be deferred for three
years from the date of approval of the plan by the court in the
Netherlands (“Approval Date”). If within two years from the
Approval Date the Company manages to repay over 50% of the
Deferred Debt, then the remaining principal payments of the
Deferred Debt shall be deferred for an additional one year.
• Interest payments for the Unsecured Debt that were due during
the suspension of payments period, will be added to the principal
and paid together with it. Following the removal of the suspension
of payments order (“Effective Date”), interest payments will be
paid on their due dates.
• As of 1 January 2014, the annual interest rate of the Unsecured
Debt shall be increased by 1.5%.
• Following the Effective Date, the Company shall pay to the holders
of the Unsecured Debt an amount of €10.5 million on account of
2014 interest payments.
• The Company, its directors and offi cers and its controlling
shareholder shall be fully released from claims.
• Following the Effective Date, the Company will have to assign
75% of the net proceeds received from the sale or refi nancing of
any of its assets to early repayment of the Unsecured Debt, to be
allocated among the holders of Unsecured Debt in accordance
with the Deferred Debt Ratio.
• The Company will be allowed to execute actual investments
only if the Company’s cash reserves contain an amount equal
to general and administrative expenses and interest payments
for the Unsecured Debt for a six-month period (for this purpose
also receivables with a high probability of being collected in the
subsequent six-month period will be taken in account for the
required minimal cash reserve).
• The plan shall also include, inter alia: (i) certain limitations on
distribution of dividends and incurring of new indebtedness; (ii)
negative pledge on direct and indirect holdings of the Company
on real estate assets; (iii) fi nancial covenants and undertakings
of the Company with respect to the sale and fi nancing of certain
projects and investment in new projects; and (iv) commitment to
publish quarterly fi nancial statements as long as the Unsecured
Debt is outstanding.
Please note that the plan is yet to be fi nalised, therefore the above
only provides a summary of the key material points without going
into specifi c details. Full details of the plan, once submitted to the
Dutch Court, will be provided on the Company’s website under
Investor relations / Debt restructuring.
8
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Competitive
strengths
Plaza’s clear priority is to conclude its restructuring process
successfully whilst continuing to leverage the ability and expertise of
its management team and the quality of its income generating assets
across all key parameters such as occupancy levels, footfall and
turnover to achieve success in its day-to-day operations.
Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring
programme on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good progress
towards resolving its liquidity situation to safeguard the continuity
of the business and thereby protect the long-term interest of its
investors, creditors and shareholders. The market prices of the
Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the restructuring
plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are moving
forward.
Whilst Plaza have witnessed some confi dence returning for
prospects in Europe’s central and eastern regions, conditions in
many of its markets remained challenging in 2013 as the persistent
uncertainty created by the crisis continued to be felt. Against this
backdrop, throughout 2013, Plaza made considerable operational
improvements across its portfolio. These are clearly refl ected in the
increase in occupancy levels from 89% at the end of 2012 to 93%
as at the reporting date. At the same time, the Company continued
to make good progress in the ongoing process of repositioning
its business model, ensuring its continued focus on deleveraging
the balance sheet and reallocating capital, primarily through
the disposal of completed or non-core assets and reinvestment
into its core yielding assets. This is best illustrated by the €61
million raised during the year through the sale of fi ve assets, the
remaining proceeds from the dissolution of the US holding entity
and successful asset management initiatives at Torun´ Plaza, Suwałki
Plaza, Kragujevac Plaza and Riga Plaza.
These improvements have been possible by leveraging of the deep
relationships that Plaza has created with retailers over a number of
years, many of whom the Company has helped introduce into new
geographies.
Despite its challenged liquidity position and restructuring process,
Plaza’s belief in the strength of the underlying fundamentals of its
assets and land reserves remains intact. By utilizing the extensive
skills of its experienced management team, the deep relationships
Plaza has with its tenants and fi nance providers, and maintaining
its cautious but opportunistic approach, the Company is positioning
itself, on completion of the restructuring, to be able to return
the rewards of capital appreciation and income growth to its
shareholders.
Proven track record
Plaza continues to benefi t from its unrivaled track record across
CEE, having been active in the region for more than 18 years. Central
and Eastern Europe economies are experiencing signs of a change
in sentiment, with Poland and the Czech Republic both reporting
increased investment activity in 2013. However, Plaza has seen
marked differences between the countries north of the region, which
have proved more resilient, and the struggling southern economies,
including Romania and Bulgaria. Despite the challanging market
conditions, several major milestones were achieved in 2013 and
the period to date. On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that
it had reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail,
entertainment and offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to
the satisfaction of certain closing conditions.
In addition, a number of signifi cant disposals of non-core assets
during the year were achieved, as follows:
• In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily holds
interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra.
• In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its
stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project
(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third
district of Prague.
• In October, a consortium of shareholders in Dream Island,
in which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale of the
Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa
€16.5 million (HUF 5 billion).
• In January 2014, in December, Plaza’s 70% subsidiary reached
an agreement to sell its 50% equity stake (together with the
other 50% joint venture partner) in the Új Udvar shopping mall in
Budapest, Hungary.
• Finally, Plaza also sold its interest in a SPV which owns a site in
Roztoky, Czech Republic which was being held for a potential
residential development.
To date, 26 of the completed centers have been subsequently sold
with an aggregate gross value of circa €1.16 billion. These disposals
comprise seventeen shopping centers in Hungary, seven in Poland
and two in the Czech Republic, with the remaining seven shopping
centers currently being held as operational assets, of which three are
located in Poland, one in the Czech Republic, one in Latvia, one in
Serbia and one in India (agreement to sell is in place).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
9
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
plaza centers/overview
comp
Plaza focuses upon creating an attractive tenant mix, including
In addition, as stated above, Plaza reached an agreement to sell
fashion, hypermarkets, food courts, electronics, sports and other
Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and offi ce scheme
retailers, with a special focus on entertainment. Most centers include
located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction of certain closing
a cinema multiplex, as well as a Fantasy Park, a state-of-the-art
conditions.
entertainment and amusement facility operated by Plaza’s subsidiary,
which includes bowling alleys, billiard tables, video arcades, internet
With two major JV developments in India due to be delivered in the
cafés, children’s playgrounds, bars and discos.
next few years, the Company’s substantial local platform means
Flexible business model
During the years 1996-2004, when exit yields were high, the Group
retained and operated shopping centers on completion and earned
rental income. Once property yields decreased, between 2004-2008,
the Group sold 26 shopping centers in line with the Company’s
commercial decision to focus its business more on development and
sale rather than operational management.
Mindful of the impact of the ongoing issues in the Eurozone on
the economies in which Plaza operates, the Company will continue
to fi nd the optimal blend of reducing its levels of gearing while
progressing its limited developing programme into the strongest
economies of the CEE. Plaza’s cautious but opportunistic approach
is set to unlock signifi cant value on behalf of its shareholders. It will
continue to sell completed developments as appropriate, but will
hold them on its balance sheet and benefi t from the rental income
until suffi cient sale prices are achieved.
Diversifi cation
Plaza is strategically placed to create shareholders value from this
growth market.
Having monitored the US real estate market for a number of
years, Plaza announced its fi rst transaction in the region in 2010
through the acquisition of a strategic stake in EDT Retail Trust
with its joint venture partners. During 2011, Plaza achieved its
aim of repositioning the portfolio through reducing debt levels,
improving occupancy rates as well as lengthening lease maturities.
Consequently, in June 2012, EPN Group, Plaza’s US-based joint
venture, completed the sale of 47 of its 49 US-based assets in a
transaction valued at US$1.428 billion, which refl ects an ROE for
Plaza of nearly 50% in a period of little over 18 months. In July
2012, EPN Group completed the disposal phase of the Company’s
highly successful fi rst venture in the US with the sale of its two
remaining US assets, and in March 2013, Plaza received the
remaining proceeds from the dissolution of the US holding entity.
Limited number of active developments
In light of market conditions, Plaza took the strategic decision in
The Group is well diversifi ed and active in eight countries in CEE
the second half of 2008 to scale back on the commencement of
and India, while additional countries are being examined for further
new projects and to focus on projects with availability of external
expansion.
Plaza sees strong importance in its investment in India, which has
been less affected by the global economic crisis and will offer Plaza
attractive development prospects for at least the next 10 years. Plaza
has maintained its long-term view of the strong potential demand for
residential and commercial Indian real estate, especially for welllocated
large scale development projects. The sentiment towards the Indian
real estate market remains extremely positive, underpinned by funda-
mentals which are driving the country’s long-term economic growth.
Phase one of the Kharadi Plaza project known as “Matrix One”, a
50:50 joint venture with a local partner, was completed in February
2012. Located in Pune, India, “Matrix One”, a 28,000m2 GLA offi ce,
was 70% pre-sold upon opening, and in May 2013, Plaza sold its
50% stake in a vehicle which primarily holds interest in Kharadi
Plaza project.
fi nancing and strong tenants demand. Plaza will progress a selected
number of projects in the CEE, such as Poland , Serbia and Romania
where GDP growth and forecasts remain above the average for
Europe. The deferral of the repayment of our debt maturities enables
us to progress with the initiation of projects and investment as
appropriate, including actively managing our income generating
assets to prepare for their ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify
exit opportunities from our remaining non-core assets. Construction
is planned to commence on Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) in Serbia,
Casa Radio, Timisoara Plaza and Cina in Romania, and Chennai in
India. The Company’s cautious but opportunistic approach is set to
unlock signifi cant value on behalf of its shareholders.
Conservative leverage
The Group’s debt position remains conservative, with gearing of
64% at the year end. Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its
10
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
etitive strengths
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
balance sheet during the period but, as a result of impairment losses
recorded in the period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level
Highly skilled management team
Extensive local and business knowledge with a proven ability
to source strategic development sites, as well as purchasing
yielding assets at an attractive price and designing projects that
meet the demands of the local market. A signifi cant proportion of
management team members have been with Plaza for several years.
Extensive network
A vast and extremely well established network of business
connections with most anchors and large international tenants and
extensive business relationships with large international funds and
real estate market participants. This has been demonstrated by our
proven ability to pre-sell projects (before or during the construction)
and achieve high levels of pre-lets.
Thorough project evaluation
Prior to each project, Plaza goes through a carefully developed,
structured evaluation process involving each of the relevant
disciplines (economics, engineering, marketing, etc.).
increased.
In November 2013, the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary signed
a new €59.3 million investment loan with a consortium comprising
two banks for its shopping and entertainment center in Riga,
Latvia. The new facility has duration of four years and therefore
substantially lengthens the duration of the debt compared to the
previous loan facility, which was due for repayment on 30 June
2014.
Total bank borrowing reduced to €175 million. This decrease is
primarily the result of loans disposed of and repaid during the year.
All loans were accounted for as current liabilities following the
suspension of payments by Plaza and the uncertainty surrounding
the restructuring plan.
Clearly identifi ed pipeline and acquisitions
Plaza is engaged in 27 development projects, and owns two offi ce
buildings and seven operational assets, located across the CEE
region and in India. The Group has the ability to identify new growth
opportunities, constantly targeting attractive returns in fastgrowing
emerging markets.
Capital markets
On 20 November 2012, the Board approved the extension of the
Company’s second bond buyback programme of A and B series
Notes traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. The bond buyback
programme will conclude on 31 December 2014 with a maximum
amount to be purchased of up to NIS 600 million, increased from
NIS 150 million. Under the two bond buyback schemes (the fi rst
was concluded on 28 November 2011 in which the target of
NIS 150 million was fully executed), Plaza has to date repurchased
and cancelled NIS 38.6 million par value of its A and B series bonds
and as of 31 December 2013 the outstanding amount was
NIS 15.9 million par value of bond series B, as a result of bond
repayments and bonds resale.
Strong brand name
Plaza Centers has become a widely recognized brand name for
successful property development in CEE which is benefi cial at
all stages of project execution (e.g. following portfolio sales to
Klépierre, Dawnay Day and aAIM, the purchasers continue to use the
“Plaza Centers” trade name under license).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
11
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Our markets
Europe
Poland
Serbia
Romania
Latvia
Czech Repp.
Hungary
Greece
Bulgaria
India
India
* Source: CIA – The World Factbook.
12
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Marrkket daataa
CurCurrrCuCu renrennt mt maarkrkeet
Population (m)*
Poland
Serbia
Romania
Latvia
Czech Republic
38.4
7.2
21.8
2.2
10.6
GDP per capita*
Hungary
Greece
Bulgaria
India
10
10.8
7
1,221
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
10
8
6
4
2
0
Serbia Romania
Latvia
Czech
Republic
Hungary Greece Bulgaria
India
Unemployment*
Serbia Romania
Latvia
Czech
Republic
Hungary Greece Bulgaria
India
CPI - Change in 2013*
Serbia Romania
Latvia
Czech
Republic
Hungary
Bulgaria
India
Greece
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Our portfolio
at a glance
Total of 29 assets located across CEE region and in India.
Estimated value of €2,039 million on completion.
Portfolio composition – by country
Market value of the land and project (€m)2
10
8
6
4
2
0
1
9
Active
Under development/planning
Offi ces
4
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Poland
Serbia Romania
Latvia
Czech
Republic
Hungary Greece Bulgaria
India
Project
Complete and active projects
Current developments
Pipeline projects
Total as at 31 December 2013
1 Value of Plaza Centers’ stake by Cushman and Wakefi eld as of 31 December 2013.
2 Excluding Koregaon Park Plaza, as there is an agreement for sale in place.
3 Some of the assets were valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was estimated.
Group NAV at 31 December 2013
Market value of land and projects by Cushman and Wakefi eld4
Assets minus liabilities as at 31 December 20135
Total
NAV per issued share
4 Except for Târgu Mures¸ (Romania) project, where the company has applied a more conservative value.
5 Excluding book value of assets which were valued by Cushman and Wakefi eld.
180
177
77
44
18
12
15
2
28
Serbia Romania
Latvia
Czech
Republic
Hungary Greece Bulgaria
India
200
160
120
80
40
0
Market value on
completion (€m)1
Market value of the land
and the project (€m)1
261.52
1,067.9
709.13
2,038,5
261.52
195.8
90.5
547.8
€’000
545,142
(271,370)
273,772
£0.79
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
13
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Timis¸oara
Plaza
Romania
38,000m2
GLA
Plaza owns a plot of land with an area of 32,000m2 in
Timis¸oara, on which it is intending to develop a shopping
and entertainment center. The planned center will
have a GLA of approximately 38,000m2 and includes a
supermarket, a hypermarket complex, fashion retailers, a
fantasy park, a food court and restaurants. Plaza intends
to commence construction in 2014/2015 and the center is
scheduled to open in 2016.
Development
focus
The Company took the strategic
decision to scale back on starting
new projects and acquisitions, and to
focus on projects with availability of
external fi nancing or strong tenants
demand. In the near future the Group
plans to progress in a selected
number of projects which are: Casa
Radio (fi rst phase), Timis¸oara Plaza
and Cina in Romania; Łódz´ Plaza in
Poland; Belgrade Plaza (MUP) and
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) in Serbia
and Chennai in India. Out of these
seven projects Plaza presents here
three, which it intends to complete in
the upcoming years.
14
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Łódz´
Plaza
Poland
35,000m2
GLA
Łódz´ is the second largest city in Poland with over 740,000
inhabitants. The site owned by Plaza is located in a residential
district of the city with a catchment area of 270,000 people.
Łódz´ Plaza is planned to be a two-fl oor shopping and entertain-
ment center with approximately 35,000 m² of GLA anchored
by a supermarket, a department store as well as a multi-screen
cinema and bowling and entertainment center. The project
is currently under Master Plan stage which is expected to be
completed by the end of 2014. Plaza intends to commence
construction in 2015/2016, with completion targeted for 2017.
Belgrade
Plaza
(Visnjicka)
Serbia
32,000m2
GLA
Plaza owns a 31,000m2 plot of land in Belgrade, the capital
of Serbia. The Belgrade market offers particular potential,
with its large populated catchment area of approximately
2.5 million people. Plaza intends to develop a new shopping
and entertainment center with a GLA of approximately
32,000m2. The Group intends to commence construction
in 2014/2015 and the center is scheduled to open in
2015/2016.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
15
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Current
portfolio
Poland
Project
City
Ownership
GLA (m2)
Market value Market value of the
Expected
Torun´ Plaza
Suwałki Plaza
Torun´
Suwałki
Zgorzelec Plaza
Zgorzelec
Łódz´ Plaza
Kielce Plaza
Leszno Plaza
Łódz´ (Residential)
Łódz´
Kielce
Leszno
Łódz´
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
* Operating ** Under planning and feasibility examination
1 In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used
in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.
2 Asset was valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was
estimated.
3 GBA
Plaza has already completed 10 shopping and entertainment
centers in Poland of which seven have already been sold.
Currently the Group owns and operates three completed shopping
and entertainment centers across Poland. During the year, each
of the centers have delivered notable asset management success,
with over 6,800m2 of new lettings achieved, improving overall
occupancy throughout the Polish portfolio from 87% in 2012 to
90% as at the reporting date.
on completion
land and project
completion
31 December
31 December
2013 (€)
2013 (€)
97,580,000
97,580,000 Opened in Q4 2011*
43,525,000
43,525,000 Opened in Q2 2010*
17,125,000
17,125,000 Opened in Q1 2010*
74,214,000
7,925,000
2017
75,502,000
5,350,0001
n/a2
1,719,000
6,500,000
**
**
**
40,000
20,000
13,000
35,000
33,000
16,000
80,0003
89,331,000
Torun´ Plaza
Torun´ Plaza: complete and active project
Zgorzelec Plaza: complete and active project
Torun´ Plaza is located in Torun´, an almost 800-year-old city of
Zgorzelec Plaza is located in Zgorzelec in south west Poland,
approximately 200,000 inhabitants. Torun´ is one of the most
near the German border. Thanks to two roads border crossing
beautiful cities of Poland located at the intersection of ancient trade
(including one of the largest in Poland), a railway border crossing
routes. The gothic buildings of Torun´’s old town were designated as
and the restored old town bridge which connects the old towns
a world heritage site by UNESCO in 1997. Torun´ Plaza, which opened
of Zgorzelec and Goerlitz (58,000 citizens on the German side),
in November 2011, is the Group’s tenth completed development
Zgorzelec is a “gate” between Germany and Poland. The shopping
in Poland. The two-fl oor shopping and entertainment center with
approximately 40,000m2 of GLA, is anchored by Zara, Reserved,
Home & You, New Yorker, H&M, Media Expert, Carry, TK Maxx, a
multi-screen Cinema City, Pure fi tness center as well as a Fantasy
and entertainment center is situated less than fi ve minutes walking
distance from the railway station. Zgorzelec Plaza comprises
approximately 13,000m2 of GLA anchored by H&M, KappAhl,
Douglas, Carry, a Fantasy Park entertainment area, a fi tness center,
Park bowling and entertainment area. In 2013, occupancy of the
the only cinema in the area and 300 parking spaces. In 2013,
mall increased to 89% compared to 84% in 2012. The contract with
TK Maxx, the multinational fashion retailer was signed for 2700m2,
creating a new two-level store which was opened in March 2014.
The letting represents circa 7% of the total lettable area of the mall.
occupancy increased to 91% from 89% in 2012 and the center
achieved a 58% growth in turnover on a year-to-year basis.
16
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Suwałki Plaza
Leszno Plaza
Suwałki Plaza: complete and active project
Kielce Plaza: pipeline project
Suwałki Plaza is located in Suwałki, a city crossed by expressway
Plaza has won a competitive tender and acquired a site from PKS
E67(8), which links Augustow with the Lithuanian border. Suwałki
Kielce S.A. (the local branch of the Polish National Bus Company)
is a city with approximately 70,000 inhabitants and is located 45km
for the development of a major new shopping and entertainment
from the Polish-Lithuanian border. The creation of Suwałki special
center in Kielce. The new center will be located on a 30,000m² plot
economic zone offers new opportunities for trade, commerce and
alongside a major road and two km from the heart of Kielce. Kielce
tourism. Suwałki Plaza, which was opened in May 2010, is located
has over 200,000 inhabitants and an estimated catchment area of
in the main commercial and residential district of the city and is
approximately 350,000 people, and is located in Central Poland on
fronted by an important arterial route to the east. It is also located
the main motorway linking Warsaw and Kraków. On completion,
on a junction of a street which links directly into the city center. The
the scheme will have a GLA of 33,000m², and approximately
PKS bus terminal and main railway station are located approximately
1,000 car parking spaces. The Company will be targeting a mixture
one km from the shopping and entertainment center. Suwałki
of domestic and high-profi le international retailers and entertainment
Plaza is a three-fl oor shopping and entertainment center with
approximately 20,000m2 of GLA anchored by Delima delicatessen,
H&M, KappAhl, Deichmann, Carry, HeBe, Douglas and Empik. The
operators as potential tenants for the center. The project is under
planning and feasibility examination.
entertainment area comprises a three-screen cinema and bowling
Leszno Plaza: pipeline project
and entertainment center. In 2013, occupancy increased to 91%
compared to 90% in 2012.
Łódz´ Plaza: current development
Plaza has a perpetual usufruct over a 18,000m² site in Leszno,
for the development of a new shopping and entertainment center.
The site is ideally located in the center of Leszno, a city with
65,000 inhabitants, situated in western Poland between the two
Łódz´ Plaza is located in Łódz´ , the second largest city in Poland with
big economic centers of Poznan´ and Wrocław, and is close to
over 740,000 inhabitants.
the central railway and bus station. On completion, the shopping
Łódz´ is recognized as an important academic and cultural center
and entertainment center is intended to have a GLA of 16,000m²
in Poland, hosting well-known cultural events. The site is located
providing space for over 70 shops and 450 car parking spaces. The
in a residential district of the city with a catchment area of 270,000
project is under planning and feasibility examination.
people. Łódz´ Plaza is planned to be a two-fl oor shopping and
entertainment center with approximately 35,000m² of GLA anchored
Łódz´ (Residential): pipeline project
by a supermarket, a department store as well as a multi-screen
cinema and bowling and entertainment center. The project is
Plaza owns part of a development site and has a perpetual usufruct
currently under Master Plan stage, which shall be prepared by the
over the remaining part of the site, located in the center of Łódz´, which
city municipality and the process is expected to be completed by
is suitable for use as a residential and offi ces area. The city of Łódz´,
the end of 2014. The Group intends to commence construction in
which is the administrative capital of the Łódzkie region, is situated in
2015/2016, with completion targeted for 2017.
the center of Poland approximately 140km south west of Warsaw, and,
with a population of over 740,000, it is the second most populous city
in Poland. The site is located in the central university district, within
500 meters of the popular Piotrkowska pedestrian street. The site is
also located in close proximity to large high density housing estates.
The planned development will comprise built area of approximately
80,000m2. The Group is also considering selling the plot.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
17
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Current
portfolio
Serbia
Project
City
Ownership
GLA (m2)
Market value Market value of the
Expected
on completion
land and project
completion
31 December
31 December
2013 (€)
2013 (€)
Kragujevac Plaza
Kragujevac
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka)
Belgrade
Belgrade Plaza (MUP)
Belgrade
100%
100%
100%
22,000
32,000
41,775,000
41,775,000 Opened in Q1 2012*
108,309,000
19,025,000
2015-2016
63,0001
145,729,000
16,150,000
2017
* Operating
1 GBA
In March 2012, Plaza completed its fi rst shopping and
entertainment center in Serbia, Kragujevac Plaza. It is the fi rst
western-style shopping and entertainment center to be opened
outside the capital, Belgrade. As of the reporting date, the center
is fully let to remarkable tenants, demonstrating the success
of the Company’s fi rst venture into Serbia. Currently the Group
has two additional sites for the development of mixed-use and
shopping and entertainment projects in the capital Belgrade.
Kragujevac Plaza: complete and active project
Kragujevac Plaza
Kragujevac is the fourth largest city in Serbia with a population of
180,000 inhabitants and a wider catchment area of approximately
Belgrade Plaza (MUP): current development
490,000 people. It is the largest city in the Sumadija region and the
administrative center of the region.
The shopping and entertainment center, which was opened to
the public in March 2012, comprises 22,000m2 of GLA and is
anchored by C&A, New Yorker, Home Center, Cineplexx, Deichmann,
McDonald’s, Adidas, Benetton and Idea.
Plaza won a competitive tender announced by the Government of
Serbia for a site located in the center of Belgrade, which it intends to
develop into an offi ce space together with a hotel and retail gallery.
The development is expected to comprise a total of 63,000m2 of GBA
including an apartment hotel, business center and shopping gallery
Kragujevac Plaza is the fi rst western-style shopping center that has
as well as 700 car parking spaces.
been completed in Serbia outside the capital, Belgrade.
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka): current development
The Belgrade market offers particular potential, with its large
populated catchment area of approximately 2.5 million people. The
new complex will be located on the prominent site of the former
Plaza owns a 31,000m2 plot of land in Belgrade, the capital of
Serbia. The Belgrade market offers particular potential, with its large
Federal Ministry of Internal Affairs, situated on the main street
which runs through the center of Belgrade. The area is home to
populated catchment area of approximately 2.5 million people.
foreign embassies, the Serbian Government, the Serbian Ministry of
The Company intends to develop a new shopping and entertainment
center with a total GLA of approximately 32,000m2. The Group
intends to commence construction in 2014/2015 and the center is
Finance, the Belgrade Chamber of Commerce and Belgrade’s largest
public hospital as well as the city fair and the future railway station.
The Group intends to commence construction in 2015/2016 and the
scheduled to open in 2015/2016.
center is scheduled to open in 2017.
18
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
O
V
V
E
E
R
R
V
V
I
I
E
E
W
W
Belgrade
Plaza
(MUP)
Serbia
63,000m2
GBA
The building is located in the center of Belgrade in
a neighborhood of government offi ces and foreign
embassies. On completion, Belgrade Plaza (MUP) will
comprise a shopping gallery, an apartment hotel and
business center. Construction is planned to commence in
2015/2016 and completion is scheduled for 2017.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
19
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Current
portfolio
Romania
Project
City
Ownership
GLA (m2)
Market value Market value of the
Expected
on completion
land and project
completion
31 December
31 December
2013 (€)
2013 (€)
700
1,800,000
1,800,000
Operating
38,000
76,965,000
10,825,000
555,0001
622,880,000
130,613,000
2016
20172
4,786
58,000
14,000
17,000
14,000
10,000
18,000
n/a4
n/a4
2015-2016
94,946,000
11,550,000
14,868,000
40,920,000
9,959,000
5,620,000
1,650,000
2,375,000
72,344,000
6,175,0005
n/a6
6,300,000
*
*
*
*
*
*
100%
100%
75%
100%3
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Palazzo Ducale
Timis¸oara Plaza
Casa Radio
Cina Plaza
Ias¸i
Bucharest
Timis¸oara
Bucharest
Bucharest
Ias¸i
Csíki Plaza
Miercurea Ciuc
Slatina Plaza
Slatina
Hunedoara Plaza
Hunedoara
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza
Târgu Mures¸
Constant¸a Plaza
Constant¸a
* Under planning and feasibility examination
1 GBA
2 First phase
3 Development rights
4 External valuation was not conducted.
5 In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used
in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.
6 Asset was valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was
estimated.
Plaza has a signifi cant development pipeline in Romania,
with nine sites for shopping and entertainment centers and
mixed-use schemes in various stages of development.
The Company continues checking the feasibility and planning of
the projects, including obtaining permits.
Timis¸oara Plaza
Palazzo Ducale (Bucharest): operational offi ce
Timis¸oara Plaza: current development
In October 2007, the Company acquired a prestigious French-style
villa converted into an offi ce building. The building is located in the
Plaza owns a plot of land with an area of 32,000m2 in Timis¸oara, on
which it is intending to develop a shopping and entertainment center.
center of Bucharest and was completely renovated in 2005. The total
constructed area is approximately 700m2, built on a plot of around
600m2 and consists of three fl oors, a basement and a garage.
All three fl oors are currently leased.
The site is situated in the north east of Timis¸oara, a city in western
Romania, close to the border with Hungary with a population
of 320,000 inhabitants and a catchment area of approximately
700,000 inhabitants. The site is situated on a three-way junction
and enjoys excellent visibility. The planned center will have a GLA of
approximately 38,000m2 which is intended to include a supermarket,
a hypermarket complex, fashion retailers, a fantasy park, a food
court and restaurants. The Group intends to commence construction
in 2014/2015 and the center is scheduled to open in 2016.
20
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Casa
Radio
Romania
555,000m2
GBA
Casa Radio will include a 76,000m2 GLA shopping mall
with an 11,000m2 hypermarket and indoor leisure center
(one of the largest in Europe), ferris wheel, approximately
148,000m2 GLA of offi ces, hotel complex with conference
center and 300 rooms, an apartment hotel with 150
apartments, casino and approximately 4,500 underground
car parking spaces.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
21
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Romania
Casa Radio (Bucharest): current development
In February 2007, the Company consummated a transaction for the
acquisition of a 75% interest in a company (the “Project Company”),
which under a public-private partnership agreement with the
Government of Romania is expected to develop the Casa Radio
(Dambovit¸a) site in central Bucharest. The property comprises a
site covering an approximate area of 92,000m2 (97,000m2 including
5,000m2 for Public Authority Building (“PAB”)).
The proposed scheme will comprise the refurbishment of the existing
building as well as the development of additional space annexed
to the building and on adjoining land. The development of Casa
Radio comprises approximately 555,000m2 of built area, including
a 76,000m2 GLA shopping mall with an 11,000m2 hypermarket and
indoor leisure center (one of the largest in Europe), ferris wheel,
approximately 148,000m2 GLA of offi ces, hotel complex with
conference center and 300 rooms, an apartment hotel with 150
apartments, casino and approximately 4,500 underground car parking
Ias¸i Plaza: pipeline project
Ias¸i Plaza
Hunedoara Plaza
spaces. The Company expects to complete the fi rst phase of the pro-
ject, which includes the shopping center, parking and PAB, in 2017.
Plaza has purchased a 46,500m2 plot of land in Ias¸i, on which it
is expecting to develop a shopping and entertainment center and
offi ce space. Ias¸i Plaza is situated in Ias¸i, a city in the north east of
Romania, with a population of approximately 350,000 inhabitants
and a catchment area of approximately 820,000 inhabitants. The
shopping center is planned to comprise approximately 40,000m2 of
GLA, and is intended to include an anchor supermarket, a cinema,
fashion retailers, a fantasy park, a food court and restaurants. In
addition, the project is intended to include offi ce space of 18,000m2
GLA. The project is under planning and feasibility examination.
Csíki Plaza: pipeline project
Slatina Plaza
Plaza purchased a plot of land with an area of 36,500m2 in Miercurea
Ciuc, for the development of a shopping and entertainment center.
Cina (Bucharest): current development
Plaza has lease rights for 49 years (starting 12/2007) for an existing
building in Cina, Bucharest. Cina is located in Bucharest city center,
on Calea Victoriei Venue, next to Romanian Athenaeum, among
central iconic landmarks: Romanian Art Museum, Revolution
Csíki Plaza is situated in the center of Miercurea Ciuc, a city in
Romania, with a population of 50,000 inhabitants and a catchment
area of approximately 300,000 inhabitants. The site is situated
400 meters from the city hall. The shopping center is planned to
have a GLA of approximately 14,000m2, and is intended to include
a supermarket, fashion retailers, a food court and restaurants.
Construction commenced in late 2008 and stopped during 2009
Square, Central University Library and more. The Group intends to
due to lack of interest from tenants derived from the economic
develop the building into an exclusive offi ce building with luxury
retail space with a GLA of approximately 5,000m2. The Group intends
to commence construction in 2014 and the center is scheduled to
crisis. Currently the Group intends to sell the project or alternatively
checking the option to lease-up the project parallel to the
development of other sites in Romania – subject to leasing progress
open in 2015/2016.
and fi nancing.
22
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Cina
Plaza
Romania
4,786m2
GLA
Cina Plaza is located in Bucharest city center, on Calea
Victoriei Venue, next to Romanian Athenaeum. The Group
intends to develop the building into an exclusive offi ce
building with luxury retail space with a GLA of approximately
5,000m2. The Group intends to commence construction in
2014 and the center is scheduled to open in 2015/2016.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
23
Slatina Plaza: pipeline project
Plaza has acquired a site in Slatina, in southern Romania. The site
totals approximately 24,000m2 and is located in the north west part
of Slatina. Slatina is a city with around 80,000 inhabitants and is
considered a major city in the county of Olt which has approximately
520,000 inhabitants. The Company plans to build a shopping and
entertainment center with approximately 17,000m2 of GLA.
The project is under planning and feasibility examination.
Hunedoara Plaza: pipeline project
Plaza has acquired a 41,000m2 site in Hunedoara. The site is
intended to be developed into a modern, western-style shopping and
entertainment center, with 14,000m2 of GLA. It is ideally located on
the main entry to the city from Deva which is near the city center.
It has 70,000 inhabitants and catchment area of 200,000 people.
The project is under planning and feasibility examination.
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza: pipeline project
Plaza has acquired a 31,500m2 site in Târgu Mures¸, to develop
a power center, with a planned GLA of 10,000m2. The proposed
development is ideally located near to the city center, close to the
main road that links to the neighbouring towns of Cluj-Napoca and
Alba Iulia. The project is under planning and feasibility examination.
Constant¸a: pipeline project
Plaza has acquired a 26,500m2 plot in Constant¸a. The plot is
conveniently located on one of the two main entrance roads to the
city and consists of an existing shopping center and an open parking
lot of 8,500m2. Constant¸a is located on the Black Sea bank and is
one of Romania’s main industrial, commercial and tourist centers.
The Group is investigating the option of adapting the existing
shopping center to create approximately 18,000m2 of GLA which will
be suitable for one big anchor such as a leading supermarket and/or
a DIY store together with some smaller retail units.
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Current
portfolio
India
Project
City
Ownership
GLA (m2)
Market value Market value of the
Expected
Koregaon Park Plaza
Chennai
Bangalore
Pune
Chennai
Bangalore
100%
40%
25%
41,000
230,0002
310,0003
on completion
land and project
completion
31 December
31 December
2013 (€)
SOLD1
2013 (€)
SOLD1 Opened in Q1 2012*
39,899,000
11,272,000
2014-2019
90,665,000
12,251,000
**
* Operating ** Under planning and feasibility examination
1 The Company signed an agreement for the sale of Koregaon Park Plaza (subject to the
fulfi lment of certain closing conditions), therefore no valuation was conducted.
The book value of the asset is circa €40 million.
2 For sale.
3 GBA
In May 2013, the Group has completed its fi rst transaction in India
with the sale of its 50% interest in a vehicle which mainly holds
interest in an offi ce complex project located in Pune, India.
In November 2013, the Group reached an agreement to
sell Koregaon Park Plaza, its fi rst completed shopping and
entertainment center in India which was opened in 2012.
Currently the Group has interest (through a joint venture with Elbit
Imaging) in two sites for residential developments located in the
cities of Chennai and Bangalore.
Bangalore
Koregaon Park Plaza: complete and active project
Chennai: current development
Koregaon Park Plaza shopping and entertainment center comprises
a 41,000m2 GLA and it was completed and opened to the public in
March 2012. It is the Group’s fi rst completed project in India and
The Indian JV Vehicle (in which Plaza’s share is 50%) has an
80% stake in a company which holds a 75 acres plot (and paid
advances in order to secure acquisition of an additional 8.4 acres)
is located in the upmerket area of Pune, Maharashta State. In June
in Chennai, India’s fourth largest city with a population of over
2012, a fi re event occurred at the center (due to a tenant’s faulty
electrical equipment), which required a temporary close-down,
but did not consume it entirely. The center’s safety and evacuation
procedures were implemented quickly and effi ciently and no injuries
eight million people. The site will be developed into a residential
project consisting of approximately 160,000m2 of plotted area for
development and approximately 70,000m2 for high quality villas. The
Company anticipates that the project will be completed in phases
occurred in the incident. Although roughly two thirds of the center’s
between 2014/2015 to 2018/2019.
rentable area was reopened in August 2012, the reminder of the cen-
ter required extensive renovation and these works were completed
Bangalore: pipeline project
in the second quarter of 2013. In June 2013 the Company collected
INR 529 million (€6.9 million) refund from the insurance company
The Indian JV Vehicle currently has a 50% stake in a company which
in connection with the damage occurred in the fi re in Koregaon Park
has rights on a 54 acres plot in Bangalore. The site located on the
shopping center, which covered all the renovation costs.
eastern side of Bangalore, India’s fi fth largest city, with a population
In November 2013 Plaza reached an agreement to sell the Koregaon
of over eight million people. The JV Vehicle intends to develop
Park Plaza, subject to the fulfi lment of certain closing conditions.
the site into a mega mixed-use project with a total built area of
310,000m2. The project will comprise over 1,100 luxury residential
units. The project is under planning and feasibility examination.
24
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Koregaon Park Plaza, India
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
25
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Latvia
Czech Republic
Hungary
Greece
Bulgaria
Project
City
Ownership
GLA (m2)
Market value Market value of the
Expected
on completion
land and project
completion
31 December
31 December
2013 (€)
2013 (€)
Latvia
Riga Plaza
Czech Republic
Liberec Plaza
Hungary
Riga
50%
49,000
43,863,000
43,863,000 Opened in Q1 2009*
Liberec
100%
17,000
17,675,000
17,675,000 Opened in Q1 2009*
David House
Budapest
Arena Plaza extension
Budapest
100%
100%
2,000
40,000
3,950,000
3,950,000
Operating
88,941,000
7,800,000
Greece
Pireas Plaza
Bulgaria
Athens
100%
26,000
94,555,000
15,300,000
Shumen Plaza
Shumen
100%
20,000
31,260,000
2,125,000
**
**
**
* Operating ** Under planning and feasibility examination
Plaza owns two operating shopping centers in Latvia and in the
Czech Republic, three developments in Hungary, Greece and
Bulgaria, and one offi ce building in Hungary.
Latvia
Riga Plaza: complete and active project
Liberec Plaza, Czech Republic
Riga Plaza is located on the west coast of the Daugava river, south
west of Riga’s city center. Riga, the capital of Latvia and the largest
city in the Baltic States, has a population of approximately 750,000
inhabitants. Riga Plaza has excellent connections to the city center
(a three to fi ve-minute drive), as well as outstanding connections
to the nearby main roads. There are eight public transport stops
Czech Republic
(trolleybus and bus) located within 500 meters, with the nearest
Liberec Plaza: complete and active project
public transport stop located directly in front of Riga Plaza. The
primary catchment area is made up of the 350,000 inhabitants
Liberec Plaza is located in the center of Liberec, a city in the north of
of Riga’s west coast. Riga Plaza is a two-fl oor shopping and
entertainment center with a GLA of approximately 49,000m2,
anchored by a hypermarket, an eight-screen multiplex cinema
and 2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. In 2013, occupancy of the mall has
increased to 97% from 94% in 2012. H&M, a multinational fashion
retailer signed a contract for 2,700m2 store which was opened in
April 2014. It is expected that the mall will be fully let by the end
of 2014.
the Czech Republic, close to the border with Germany and Poland,
with a population of 101,000 inhabitants and catchment area of
approximately 350,000 inhabitants. The site is situated 20 meters from
the main square. The complete center comprises of approximately
17,000m2 of GLA, and includes an anchor supermarket, fashion
retailers, a squash and sports center, a Dinopark, a food court and
restaurants. The center is also comprising a residential area of
514m2 (fi ve apartments) and 1,100m2 of offi ce space. The center
was opened to the public in March 2009. Occupancy of the mall
increased in 2013 to 86% compared to 80% in 2012.
26
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Riga
Plaza
Latvia
49,000m2
GLA
Riga Plaza is a two-fl oor shopping and entertainment
center with a GLA of approximately 49,000m2, anchored
by a hypermarket, an eight-screen multiplex cinema and
2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. It is expected that the mall
will be fully let by the end of 2014.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
27
W
E
I
V
R
E
V
O
Latvia
Czech Republic
Hungary
Greece
Bulgaria
Hungary
Bulgaria
David House (Budapest): operational offi ce
Shumen Plaza: pipeline project
The Company owns an offi ce building located on Andrássy
Boulevard, a prestigious location and one of the most sought-
Plaza has purchased a 26,000m2 plot of land in Shumen, one of the
largest cities in north-eastern Bulgaria, 80km from Varna. The site is
after streets in the center of Budapest. Several foreign embassies
ideally situated at the crossroads of the two major traffi c arteries in
are situated nearby. The building facades of all buildings on the
Shumen, within a short walking distance to the city center, railway
Andrássy Boulevard, including David House, are listed in the “World
station and university.
Heritage” list. The building was reconstructed / refurbished by
Plaza during 2000-2001 in cooperation with the local monument
preservation authority. Many of the original features have been
Shumen Plaza is expected to be the fi rst western-style shopping
center in the district and to serve the city population of approximately
retained, including the inner courtyard, staircases, stucco, ornate
100,000 people and a larger catchment of 205,000 people. Shumen
metalwork and fi ne wood carvings. The building is located on a
800m2 plot and consists of four fl oors, an atrium and a basement,
with a total constructed area of approximately 2,000m2.
Plaza is planned to be a three-fl oor commercial and entertainment
center with 20,000m2 GLA and 650 parking spaces. The project is
under planning and feasibility examination.
Arena Plaza extension (Budapest): pipeline project
The Arena Plaza extension is a planned offi ce addition to Arena Plaza
that is intended to comprise approximately 40,000m2 GLA of “class
A” offi ces. The Arena Plaza extension will occupy part of the former
historic Kerepesi trotting track in the 8th district of Budapest. The
project is under planning and feasibility examination.
Greece
Pireas Plaza (Athens): pipeline project
Plaza currently owns a plot of approximately 15,000m2 in the city
of Piraeus, a commercial-industrial center 10km from the heart of
Athens. The site has an ideal highly visible and commercial position
at the junction of two of the biggest arteries in Attica: National
Highway, running from the north to the south of Greece and Piraeus
Avenue, connecting the center of Athens with the port of Piraeus.
Conveniently located in front of the ISAP metro line, bus stations
and in a walking distance from Europe’s largest passenger port, the
project will be easily accessed by a large catchment of more than
one million people. Pireas Plaza is planned to be a three-storey
commercial and entertainment center with 26,000m2 GLA and will be
served by four underground parking levels for 775 cars. The project
is under planning and feasibility examination.
28
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Arena Plaza extension, Hungary
Shumen Plaza, Bulgaria
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Pireas
Plaza
Greece
26,000m2
GLA
Plaza owns a plot of approximately 15,000m2 in the city
of Piraeus, a commercial-industrial center 10km from the
heart of Athens, in a walking distance from Europe’s largest
passenger port. Pireas Plaza is planned to be a three-storey
commercial and entertainment center with 26,000m2 GLA
and will be served by four underground parking levels for
775 cars, easily accessed by a large catchment of more
than one million people.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
29
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
President and
Chief Executive
Offi cer’s
statement
Ran Shtarkman
President and Chief Executive Offi cer
I am pleased to report that we are making
good progress with the restructuring process
whilst continuing to leverage the ability and
expertise of our management team to enhance
the quality of our income generating assets
across all key parameters such as occupancy
levels, footfall and turnover.
Central and Eastern Europe economies are experiencing signs of
a change in sentiment, with Poland and the Czech Republic both
reporting increased investment activity in 2013. However, we have
seen marked differences between the countries north of the region,
which have proved more resilient, and the struggling southern
economies, including Romania and Bulgaria. It was as a result of
the sustained challenging market conditions, combined with the
lack of transactional liquidity in a number of the countries in which
we operate, that we took the decision in November to withhold
payments on the upcoming maturities of our outstanding corporate
bonds and suggest a restructuring plan to creditors.
• In October, a consortium of shareholders of Dream Island, in
which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale of its Dream
Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa €16.5
million (HUF 5 billion). The proceeds of the transaction were
used by the Consortium to repay a proportion of the securitised
related bank debt held against the asset. As a result of a previous
non-cash, market driven writedown, the asset was held on Plaza’s
balance sheet at the value of the loan, which was non-recourse so
no accounting loss was incurred in the 2013 fi nancial statements.
• On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an
agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and
offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction
of certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at
circa €40 million, the asset’s current book value. Following the
repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza expects to
generate aggregate cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling
circa €18 million, before taxes and transaction costs, which
should be paid in instalments over the coming two years. The
transaction is subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions, including
consent from the fi nancing banks.
Against these specifi c and very real challenges, I am pleased to
• As announced in January 2014, in December, Plaza’s 70%
report that Plaza has, once again, been successful in delivering
subsidiary reached an agreement to sell its 50% equity stake
considerable progress at the operational level of the business
(together with the other 50% joint venture partner) in the Új
through intensive asset management initiatives such as attracting
Udvar shopping mall in Budapest, Hungary. As a result of the
signifi cant anchor tenants to our assets. We have also continued to
transaction, proceeds of €2.35 million in cash were received by
reallocate capital to pay our debts following the sale of a number of
Plaza for its share in the asset.
our completed and non-core assets.
Key Events
In line with its stated strategy, Plaza made a number of signifi cant
disposals of its non-core assets during the year, including:
• In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily
holds interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra.
The successful transaction valued assets owned by the vehicle
collectively at €33.4 million and, as a result, Plaza received gross
proceeds of circa €16.7 million.
• Finally, Plaza has also sold its interest in a SPV which owns a site
in Roztoky, Czech Republic which was being held for a potential
residential development. The site was sold for circa €2 million,
resulting in net cash proceeds of €1.3 million after debt-related
deductions.
These transactions are demonstrative of the Company’s ability to
continue to deliver on its strategy to reduce debt levels and reassign
capital realised from the sale of completed and non-core assets to
pay down debt and invest in the core yielding assets in its portfolio,
• In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its
thereby creating capital value and driving income growth.
stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project
(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third
In addition, the Company continues to make strong progress with
district of Prague. The transaction valued the asset at circa €11.1
its asset management initiatives. Occupancy levels across the
million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other
Company’s existing shopping and entertainment centers continued
balance sheet adjustments, Plaza received net proceeds of circa
to increase, reaching an overall occupancy of 93%, footfall increased
€7.6 million in cash.
by 4% and the average monthly turnover increased by 24.5%.
30
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
R
E
V
I
E
W
In addition an important refi nancing agreement was signed during
Net Asset Value per share decreased by 40%, attributable primarily
the year, with the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary signing a new
to non-cash impairments amounting to €186 million. The writedown
€59.3 million investment loan with a consortium comprising two
in value refl ects uncertainties in respect of the development of
banks for its shopping and entertainment center in Riga, Latvia. The
projects, depressed rental levels in the above mentioned countries
new facility has duration of four years and therefore substantially
and low transaction volumes resulting from a constrained supply
lengthens the duration of the debt compared to the previous loan
of debt. The majority of written down assets comprise land with
facility, which was due for repayment on 30 June 2014.
associated planning consent, which management continues to
Results
Due to a circa €186 million non-cash impairment charged against
the Company’s trading properties, equity accounted investees,
investment property and prepayments, Plaza ended the year with a
loss attributable to the owners of the Company of €218 million. A
value at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Management
will continue to evaluate the local economic context before any
development programme is commenced as well as looking at
other alternatives to monetise the land bank if development is not
economically viable.
The Company’s NAV was calculated as follows:
€186 million impairment charge related to the reduction in the value
of our assets across the portfolio with the following geographic
Use
EUR (Thousand)
breakdown: Serbia (€37 million), Romania (€27 million), India
Market value of land and projects by Cushman and Wakefi eld1 545,142
(€76 million), Czech Republic (€20 million), Greece (€12 million),
Poland (€11 million), Bulgaria and Hungary (€4.5 million) and Latvia
(€1.5 million uplift). The writedowns are a refl ection of the ongoing
economic uncertainty in many of the countries in which we operate.
As part of the Company’s commitment to repositioning the business,
Plaza raised €61 million through the successful disposal of fi ve
assets, which included receiving the remaining funds from the
Assets minus liabilities as at 31 December 20132
Total
(271,370)
273,772
1 Except for Targu Mures (Romania) project, where the company has applied a more
conservative value.
2 Excluding book value of assets which were valued by Cushman and Wakefi eld.
Portfolio progress
€1.428 billon US transaction the Company completed in 2012. The
Currently the Company is engaged in twenty development projects
2013 NOI including equity accounted from Riga Plaza totalled €17
and owns seven operational shopping and entertainment center
million (31 December 2012: €16.2 million).
assets and two offi ce schemes, located across the Central and
Eastern European region and in India. The location of the projects,
As at 31 December 2013, Plaza had a consolidated cash position
as at 13 March 2014, is summarized as follows:
(including restricted bank deposits, short-term deposits and
available for sale fi nancial assets) of approximately €33.7 million,
Number of assets (CEE and India)
Location
Active
under development/
Offi ces
planning
of which circa €7 million of cash was held as restricted cash on a
consolidated basis. Working capital stood at negative €291 million
as all the liabilities are shown as current due to the implementation
of the restructuring programme, the subsequent suspension of
payments and the classifi cation of trading properties as non-current
Romania
India
due to the uncertainties surrounding the timing of the restructuring’s
Poland
completion and the future disposal of a number of assets. As at the
date of this report, the Company has a current cash position of circa
€35.2 million (inclusive of the €7 million of restricted cash).
NAV
The Company’s property portfolio (CEE and India) was valued by
Cushman and Wakefi eld as at 31 December 2013 and their summary
valuation is shown below.
Hungary
Serbia
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
Greece
Latvia
Total
-
1
3
-
1
1
-
-
1
7
9
2
4
1
2
-
1
1
-
20
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
2
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
31
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
Liquidity & Financing
Plaza ended the year with a consolidated cash position (including
restricted bank deposits, short-term deposits and available for sale
fi nancial assets) of approximately €33.7 million, of which circa €7
million of cash is held as restricted cash on a consolidated basis.
Working capital as at 31 December 2013 totalled negative €291
million, and, as mentioned above, the Company’s current cash
position is circa €35.2 million (out of which €7 million is restricted).
Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during
the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the
period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to
64% in 2013.
On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had made the
decision to withhold material payments to bondholders, specifi cally
a circa €15 million payment due to Polish bondholders on 18
November 2013 and a circa €17 million payment due to Israeli
bondholders on 31 December 2013. Despite ongoing efforts to
complete a number of asset sales and secure some alternative
fi nancing transactions, Plaza had been unable to conclude these
deals within a timeframe that would have enabled it to meet those
payment obligations.
Aside from the proposed payment deferral, the terms of the
proposed restructuring plan do not require bondholders to take a
loss on the value of their outstanding exposures. The original date
of the creditors voting, scheduled for 17 April 2014, was postponed
to 26 June 2014 due to the technicalities involved in formally
completing the arrangement. Please refer to the Debt restructuring
page under Investor relations section on the Company’s website for
further details.
Strategy and Outlook
During the year, Plaza continued to be impacted by the lasting
economic uncertainty across CEE. Whilst fi nancial institutions in
the region remain well fi nanced, they continue to take a cautious
approach to lending and investors continue to be wary of moving
up the risk curve, both factors which are illustrated by the lack of
transactional activity in 2013.
In the shopping mall space, the core economies are well serviced
with retail and entertainment centers, so we continue to see value
in the region’s secondary cities. For this reason, as signs of an
improvement in business and investor sentiment across CEE
become even more apparent, our portfolio should be particularly
well positioned to benefi t from wider recovery in Eurozone growth.
Therefore, to ensure the long-term viability of the business, the
Board agreed to approach the creditors of the Company with a
restructuring plan so that a formalized restructuring process could
be implemented. Subsequently, on 18 November, Plaza fi led for
reorganization proceedings (surseance van betaling) with the
District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and submitted a
restructuring plan to enable it to restructure its debt and resolve its
immediate liquidity situation. This will be achieved primarily through:
• a deferral of principal payment obligations to creditors of the
Company for a period of three to four years, or shorter if cash
fl ow permits;
Notwithstanding the challenges that remain and the Company’s
current liquidity position, Plaza’s efforts to reposition the business
resulted in fi ve signifi cant sales of non-core assets and securing
increased occupancy levels, footfall and turnover across its portfolio
of operating assets. The success of the Company’s intensive
asset management initiatives, which have driven these operational
achievements, are extremely important in maximizing the income
and value of our shopping centers, particularly in the context of the
future implementation of the restructuring plan.
Alongside the management of the restructuring process, which
continues to make good progress, it is vital that Plaza continues
• interest payments made as due, with an additional 1.5% interest
to look to the long-term objectives of the business. The deferral of
to be paid in addition to regular interest;
the repayment of our debt maturities enables us to progress with
• early repayment of the Company’s debt balance upon the
the initiation of projects and investment as appropriate, including
realization or refi nancing of assets with 75% of the net cash
actively managing our income generating assets to prepare for their
fl ows;
• allocation to the representatives of the non-collateral backed debt
being shares issued representing 13.5% of the Company’s shares;
• as long as the deferred debt balance is not paid in full, no
dividend will be distributed without the majority bondholders’
consent;
• a potential rights issue of €20 million to shareholders;
• a negative pledge on Company’s assets;
ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify exit opportunities from
our remaining non-core assets.
Despite our challenged liquidity position and restructuring process,
our belief in the strength of the underlying fundamentals of our
assets and land reserves remains intact. By utilising the extensive
skills of our experienced management team, the deep relationships
we have with our tenants and fi nance providers and maintaining our
cautious but opportunistic approach, the Company is positioning
itself, on completion of the restructuring, to be able to return
• a deferral of banks’ recourse rights to the Company for
the rewards of capital appreciation and income growth to its
a further four years.
shareholders.
Ran Shtarkman
President and Chief Executive Offi cer
32
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
R
E
V
I
E
W
Operational
review
During the reporting period, Plaza made signifi cant progress against
As of the reporting date, Plaza has 29 assets in nine countries, of
its operational and strategic objectives, by delivering improved
which 20 are under various stages of development across the CEE
fundamentals at the portfolio level and realising value through the
region and India. Of these, nine are located in Romania, two in India,
sale of a number of its non-core assets.
four in Poland, two in Serbia, and single assets in Bulgaria, Greece
Highlights for the fi nancial year included:
and Hungary. In addition to these developments, Plaza retains
the ownership of and operates seven shopping and entertainment
• Operations: Improving performance of its operating shopping and
centers in Poland, Czech Republic, Serbia, India and Latvia and two
entertainment centers located in four countries in the CEE.
offi ce buildings in Budapest and Bucharest.
• Disposals: In 2013, the Company received net cash of circa €61
million through the disposal of fi ve assets (€29 million) and the
collection of the remaining proceeds from the transaction in the
US (€32 million).
The development projects are at various stages of the development
cycle, from the landholdings through to the planning and permits.
The Company’s current assets and pipeline projects are summarised
• Financial position: Plaza’s current consolidated cash position
in the table below:
stands at circa €35.2 million (out of which €7 million is restricted).
Asset/Project
Location
Nature of asset
Size
m2
(GLA)
Status *
Plaza’s
effective
ownership %
Operating Shopping and Entertainment Centers
Suwałki Plaza
Suwałki,
Poland
Retail &
20,000
100
Operating, opened in
entertainment scheme
May 2010
Zgorzelec Plaza
Zgorzelec,
Retail &
13,000
100
Operating, opened in
Poland
entertainment scheme
March 2010
Torun´ Plaza
Torun´,
Poland
Retail &
40,000
100
Operating, opened in
entertainment scheme
November 2011
Liberec Plaza
Liberec,
Retail &
17,000
100
Operating, opened in
Czech Rep.
entertainment scheme
March 2009
Kragujevac Plaza
Kragujevac,
Retail &
22,000
100
Operating, opened in
Serbia
entertainment scheme
March 2012
Riga Plaza
Riga,
Latvia
Retail &
49,000
50
Operating; opened in
entertainment scheme
March, 2009
Koregaon Park Plaza
Pune,
Retail, entertainment
41,000
100
Operating; opened in
India
and offi ce scheme
March, 2012. In November
2013 the Company reached an
agreement to sell the center,
subject to certain conditions
* All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
33
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
plaza centers/business
ope
Asset/Project
Location
Nature of asset
Size
m2
(GLA)
Status *
Plaza’s
effective
ownership %
Development Assets
Casa Radio
Bucharest,
Mixed-use retail
555,000
75
Under planning; completion
Romania
and leisure plus
offi ce scheme
(GBA including
parking spaces)
of the fi rst phase is
scheduled for 2017
Timis¸oara Plaza
Timis¸oara,
Retail &
38,000
100
Construction scheduled
Romania
entertainment scheme
Łódz´ Plaza
Łódz´ ,
Poland
Retail &
35,000
100
entertainment scheme
to commence in 2014/5;
completion scheduled for 2016
Construction scheduled
to commence in 2015/6;
completion scheduled for 2017
Belgrade Plaza
Belgrade,
Apartment-hotel and
(MUP)
Serbia
business center with
63,000
(GBA)
a shopping gallery
100
Construction scheduled
to commence in 2015/6;
completion scheduled for 2017
Belgrade Plaza
Belgrade,
Retail &
32,000
100
Construction scheduled
(Visnjicka )
Serbia
entertainment scheme
to commence in 2014/5;
completion scheduled
for 2015/6
Cina Plaza
Bucharest,
Retail & Offi ce scheme
4,786
Lease rights
Construction scheduled
Romania
(Existing building for
for 43 years
to commence in 2014;
development)
(starting
12/2007)
completion scheduled
Chennai
Chennai,
Residential scheme
230,000
40
Construction scheduled
India
(for sale)
to commence in late 2014/5;
phased completion scheduled
over 2014/5-2018/9
Operational Offi ce Buildings
David House
Budapest,
Offi ce
2,000
100
Operational offi ce
Hungary
Palazzo Ducale
Bucharest,
Offi ce
700
100
Operational offi ce
Romania
* All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.
34
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
rewiew
rational rewiew
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
R
E
V
I
E
W
Asset/Project
Location
Nature of asset
Size
m2
(GLA)
Status *
Plaza’s
effective
ownership %
Plot Size (m2)
Pipeline Projects
Kielce Plaza
Leszno Plaza
Łódz´ (Residential)
Kielce,
Poland
Leszno,
Poland
Łódz´ ,
Poland
Retail &
30,000
100
Under planning and
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Retail &
17,000
100
Under planning and
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Residential scheme
33,000
100
Under planning and
feasibility examination
Arena Plaza
extension
Budapest,
Offi ce scheme
22,000
100
Under planning and Extension
Hungary
(land use right)
feasibility examination
Csíki Plaza
Miercurea Ciuc, Retail &
36,500
100
Under planning and
Romania
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Ias¸i Plaza
Ias¸i,
Retail, entertainment
46,500
100
Under planning and
Romania
and offi ce scheme
feasibility examination
Slatina Plaza
Slatina,
Romania
Retail &
24,000
100
Under planning and
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Hunedoara Plaza
Hunedoara,
Retail &
41,000
100
Under planning and
Romania
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza
Târgu Mures¸,
Retail & entertainment
31,500
100
Under planning and
Romania
scheme (Power Center)
feasibility examination
Constant¸a Plaza
Constant¸a,
Retail &
26,500
100
Under planning and
Romania
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Shumen Plaza
Pireas Plaza
Shumen,
Bulgaria
Athens,
Greece
Retail &
26,000
100
Under planning and
entertainment scheme
feasibility examination
Retail &
15,000
100
entertainment scheme
Bangalore
Bangalore,
Residential Scheme
218,500
25
India
* All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.
Under planning and
feasibility examination
Under planning and
feasibility examination
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
35
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
plaza centers/business
ope
Details of these activities by country are as follows:
Serbia
Poland
Plaza owns and operates three completed shopping and
entertainment centers across Poland. During the year, each of the
centers have delivered notable asset management success,
including new signed leases totalling over 6,800m2, improving the
overall occupancy of the Polish portfolio to 90%.
Torun´ Plaza, which was completed and opened in late 2011,
comprises approximately 40,000m2 of GLA and represents
Plaza’s tenth completed center in Poland. Occupancy has risen to
approximately 89% (including signed lease agreements) compared
to 84% in 2012. Following the year end, TK Maxx opened as an
anchor retailer on 5 March 2014 occupying 2,700m2. The center
is currently let to premium international and local brands such as
Cinema City, H&M, C&A, KappAhl, Zara, Bershka, Stradivarius, Pull
& Bear and Massimo Dutti.
The mall demonstrated a strong operational performance over 2013,
and Plaza’s focus on asset management and marketing activities
since the mall opened led to a footfall improvement of 5% in 2013.
As a result, average monthly turnover at the mall over the 2013
Christmas period improved by 24% compared to the same period
last year.
Suwałki Plaza, comprising approximately 20,000m2 of GLA and
including tenants such as H&M, Rossmann, New Yorker, KappAhl
and Cinema Lumière, continues to perform well. Plaza has been
successful at driving the turnover at the center, with an average
increase of 10% compared to 2012. Successful asset management
initiatives undertaken by Plaza saw occupancy improve from 90% to
91% during the year.
Signifi cant operational improvement was also achieved at Zgorzelec
Plaza. The 13,000m2 shopping and entertainment center saw
occupancy levels rise from 89% in 2012 to 91% as at the reporting
date. In addition, footfall in the center increased by 29% compared
to 2012 and the center achieved a 58% growth in turnover on year
to year basis.
Plaza also continued the feasibility and planning studies at Łódz´
Plaza (comprising approximately 35,000m2 of GLA). As a result,
construction is scheduled to begin in late 2015 with completion
expected in 2017.
On 20 March 2012, Plaza opened its fi rst Serbian shopping and
entertainment center in Kragujevac, a city of 180,000 inhabitants.
Kragujevac Plaza comprises 22,000m2 of GLA and was over 90%
let on opening to tenants including Nike, Adidas, Aldo, New Yorker,
Deichmann, TerraNova, Fashion and Friends, H&O, Oviesse, Fox,
Chicco and Home Center. As at the reporting date, the center is fully
let with signifi cant improvements both in terms of footfall (+15%)
and turnover (+17%), demonstrating Plaza’s ability to capitalise on
opportunities in new markets.
Kragujevac Plaza is the fi rst western-style shopping center to be
completed outside of Belgrade, and enjoys a catchment area of
approximately 590,000 inhabitants within a 30 minute car journey
of the center. The center has a six-screen Cineplexx cinema facility
which is the only cinema and bowling facility in the region.
Plaza’s other investment in Serbia is a state-owned plot and building
in Belgrade, which Plaza secured in a competitive tender. The
building was formerly occupied by the Federal Ministry of Internal
Affairs of the former Yugoslavia and is located in the center of
Belgrade in a neighbourhood of government offi ces and foreign
embassies. On completion, the scheme, Belgrade (MUP) Plaza,
will comprise a shopping gallery, an apartment-hotel and business
center totalling circa 63,000m2 of GBA. Construction is planned to
commence in 2015/2016 and scheduled for completion in 2017.
The project is currently in the process of securing the relevant local
planning and permitting approvals.
The Company also owns a plot of land in Belgrade which will be
developed into a shopping and entertainment center. Concept
designs have been submitted and approved (location permit granted)
for Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) (previously known under the project
name Sport Star Plaza), Plaza’s proposed scheme comprising a
total GLA of approximately 32,000m2. Construction is planned to
commence during 2014/2015 with anticipated completion scheduled
for 2015/2016.
On 1 March 2013, Serbia was granted candidate status to the
European Union. Plaza believes this will signifi cantly increase the
fl ow of international capital into the country, enabling its carefully
selected Serbian development pipeline, and completed and
operational asset to benefi t from an anticipated growth in investor
interest.
36
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
rewiew
rational rewiew
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
R
E
V
I
E
W
Romania
Plaza holds a 75% interest in a company in partnership with the
Government of Romania to develop Casa Radio project (Dambovit¸a),
the largest development plot in central Bucharest. It will comprise
approximately 555,000m2 of GBA, including a 76,000m2 GLA
shopping mall and leisure center (one of the largest in CEE), offi ces,
hotel, an apartment hotel and a convention and conference hall. The
Company has obtained the Detailed Urban Permit (“PUD”) and the
Zonal Urban Plan (“PUZ”) to the Dambovit¸a Center Multifunctional
Complex and completion of the fi rst phase is scheduled for
2016/2017.
In light of the fi nancial crisis, and in order to insure a construction
process that is aligned to current market conditions, the Company
started preliminary discussions with the Authorities (which are
both shareholders of the SPV and a party to the Public Private
Partnership (“PPP”) regarding the future development of the project.
The Company has also offi cially notifi ed the Authorities that it will be
seeking to redefi ne some of the terms of the existing PPP contract,
such as timetable, structure and project milestones.
In addition, Plaza continued the feasibility and planning studies and
permitting of Timis¸oara Plaza (comprising approximately 38,000m2
of GLA) and Cina in Bucharest Romania. At Timis¸oara Plaza,
construction is scheduled to begin in late 2014 with completion
expected in 2016. The Cina retail and offi ce scheme will comprise
app. 4,800m2 GLA with an expected completion date in 2015/2016.
India
On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an
agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and
offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction of
certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at €40
million, the asset’s current book value. Following the repayment
of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza will receive aggregate
net cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling circa €16 million
(after tax and transaction costs). Subject to fulfi lment of certain
conditions, including a consent from the fi nancing bank, the
Company expects to collect the fi rst part of this, totalling circa
€10m, in the coming six months and the remaining consideration
will then follow in several instalments until 2016.
a 47.5% stake in Elbit India Real Estate Holding Limited, which
already owned stakes of between 50% and 80% in three mixed-use
projects in India, in conjunction with local Indian partners. This joint
venture’s voting rights are split 50:50 between Elbit and Plaza.
These three projects are as follows:
Bangalore - This residential project, owned in an equal share
between the JV and a prominent local developer, is located on the
eastern side of Bangalore, India’s fi fth largest city with a population
of more than eight million inhabitants. With a total built area of over
310,000m2, it will comprise over 1,100 luxury residential units when
completed. In 2010, the JV signed a new framework agreement
which, inter alia, entitles the JV to receive 70% of the net proceeds
from the project until a target 20% IRR is received. Once the JV has
received the 20% IRR on its investment, the JV will exit the project.
Currently the project is in planning phase. As at 31 December 2013,
due to uncertainty about the Group’s ability to develop the project in
the foreseeable future, the Group recorded €31 million of writedown
expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss for the year.
Chennai - A residential development, which is 80% owned by the
JV and 20% by a prominent local developer. The scheme will be
developed into a residential project consisting of approximately
160,000m2 of plotted area for development and approximately
70,000m2 for high quality villas. Chennai is India’s fourth largest
city with a population of more than eight million inhabitants. The
JV is currently in advanced negotiations to sign a joint development
agreement with a reputable local developer to complete the project.
As at 31 December, due to uncertainty about the Group’s ability to
develop the project in the foreseeable future, the Group estimated
the net realizable value of the project according to a comparable
model. This resulted in the Group recording €20.7 million of
writedown expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.
Kochi Island - A 50:50 partnership with a local developer, this
mixed-use project will comprise more than 575,000m2 of high-
end residential apartment buildings, offi ce complexes, a hotel and
serviced apartments complex, retail area and a marina. It is located
on a backwater island adjacent to the administrative, commercial and
retail hub of the city of Kochi, in the state of Kerala. Kochi has a local
population of more than two million inhabitants.
In 2008, Plaza formed a joint venture with Elbit Imaging (“JV”) to
develop three mega mixed-use projects in Bangalore, Chennai and
Kochi in India. Under the terms of the agreement Plaza acquired
Plaza’s investment in Kochi project (€4.3 million) was done through
a pre-payment advance guaranteed by Elbit, its parent company.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
37
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
On 11 November 2013, the Company demanded and exercised a
corporate guarantee in the amount of €4.3 million including the
Hungary
Plaza has a transferable land use right to plot of land on which it
plans to develop an offi ce extension onto the Arena Plaza shopping
center built by the Company. The extension will comprise an offi ce
complex with approximately 40,000m2 of GLA. In line with Plaza’s
cautious approach to development, it is waiting for the recovery of
the Budapest offi ce market and a general rise in both occupancy
rates and rental fee levels before beginning construction of the
project.
The Group continues to own its offi ce building, David House on
Andrássy Boulevard, in Budapest.
Greece
Plaza owns a land plot which received the relevant planning
permission for a 26,000m2 GLA shopping and entertainment center.
Although the land plot is in an excellent location, in line with the
Company’s prudent approach to development, Plaza will continue to
monitor the macroeconomic situation in Greece before committing
additional capital to the project.
interest thereon up until such date (the “Reimbursement Payment”)
which has been provided by Elbit within the terms of the original
Indian JV Agreement, on the grounds of Elbit defaulting on the
fi nalisation and conclusion of the transfer of the Kochi Project Rights
to the Indian JV Vehicle.
In its reply letter, Elbit has refused to repay the Reimbursement
Payment. The Company is of the view that based on the
abovementioned JV Agreement and its ancillary documents
(including the corporate guarantee issued by EIbit in the Company’s
favour as mentioned above), it has a valid claim to recover the €4.3
million.
Despite the above view, and in view of uncertainties, the Company
has made the decision to impair the pre-payment in its fi nancials.
Latvia
In March 2009, Plaza completed and opened Riga Plaza, the
49,000m2 shopping and entertainment center in which Plaza owns a
50% stake.
Riga Plaza is located on the western bank of the River Daugava
by the Sala Bridge. The center continues to deliver signifi cant
operational improvements, seeing occupancy levels increase to 97%
following the lease agreement signed with H&M which has opened
a 2,700m2 store in April 2014. There are ongoing discussions with a
number of potential occupiers for the remaining space from which
Plaza hopes to conclude further lettings shortly. Also footfall and
turnover improved throughout the year by 7% and 14% respectively.
Latvia was the fastest growing economy in the EU in 2012. Following
the successful introduction of the Euro in 2013 and strengthening
household consumption, the country is well positioned for further
growth, which we expect to underpin the further improvements in
the performance of Riga Plaza going forward.
Czech Republic
Plaza continues to own and manage Liberec Plaza shopping and
entertainment center (approximately 17,000m2 GLA), which opened
in March 2009. During the period, the turnover of the mall improved
by 10%, whilst occupancy increased from 80% to 86%.
38
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Plaza has been successful
in delivering considerable progress at
the operational level of the business
through intensive asset management
initiatives such as attracting
signifi cant anchor tenants
to its assets.
Liberec Plaza, Czech Republic
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
39
W
E
I
V
E
R
S
S
E
N
I
S
U
B
Financial
review
Roy Linden
Chief Financial Offi cer
Results
During 2013, Plaza remained focused on the execution of its
strategy to dispose of non-core assets in its portfolio, to enable it
to reallocate capital to its core yielding assets and to reduce debt
levels.
The cost of operation of active malls remained at the same level
despite increasing rental income (€9.4 million in both 2012 and
2013). The cost of marketing expenses were classifi ed as part of
operating cost rather than administrative expenses, and comparative
fi gures for 2012 were also restated. The cost of the Fantasy Park
operations (operation of entertainment centers) also decreased
from €8.3 million in 2012 to €4 million in 2013 after the closures
The Company has designated its properties into three types:
mentioned above.
• Completed trading properties projects;
• Projects scheduled for construction;
• Plots in the planning phase.
In respect of its completed trading properties projects, the Company
still faces material uncertainties in respect of the time needed to sell
the properties. However the Company has not changed its business
model and is actively seeking buyers. Therefore it is clear from the
Company’s perspective that these completed properties are trading
properties, rather than investment properties.
In respect of plots held, which are not intended to be constructed
in the near future, the Company is actively looking for buyers and
does not hold the plots passively with the intention to gain from
a potential value increase. Plots scheduled for construction are
intended to be developed and sold in the normal course of business
once circumstances allow. For this reason we also believe that these
are appropriately classifi ed as trading properties. As at 31 December
2013, the trading properties were classifi ed as non-current assets
in the Statement of Financial Position, except for Koregaon Park,
India, for which a sale purchase agreement was signed during the
reporting period.
As a result of IFRS 11, the Group has changed its accounting policy
for its interests in joint arrangements. Under IFRS 11, the Group
has classifi ed its interests in joint arrangements as Equity accounted
investees. The balances of 2012 have been restated in the fi nancial
statements. The main change was the reclassifi cation of the Indian
residential JV projects and Riga Plaza (Latvia) to equity accounted investees.
Income comprised rental income from operating shopping centers:
In 2013, Plaza generated €23.7 million of income compared to
€23.1 million in 2012. The rental income performance would have
been even stronger, had there not been a loss of income caused
by a fi re incident in India. However, income from the Group’s
Fantasy Park operation which provides gaming and entertainment
services in Plaza’s active shopping centers decreased to €3.3 million
from €6.9 million in 2012 following the closure of a number of
underperforming units.
Writedown of trading properties amounted to €118 million in 2013
(€60 million in 2012). This amount is attributable mainly to projects
in Serbia (€37 million), Romania (€24.6 million), India (€15.6
million), Czech Republic (€15 million), Greece (€12 million), Poland
(€11 million) and Bulgaria (€2.4 million).
As mentioned above, in accordance with IFRS 11, the Group has
changed its accounting policy regarding joint arrangement. Joint
ventures are classifi ed as equity accounted investments.
The writedown in connection to those assets amounted to €56
million in 2013 and €23 million in 2012. More than 90% of the
writedown relates to Plaza’s Indian projects (Bangalore, Chennai and
Kharadi). This was slightly offset by the €1.5 million increase in the
value of Riga Plaza (Latvia).
Administrative expenses amounted to €9.4 million (2012: €11.4
million after restatement) an 18% decrease as a result of a decrease
in payroll and employee related expenses as part of the Company’s
efforts to reduce costs during the year.
Other expense increased from €1 million in 2012 to €11.5 million in
2013, due to the impairment of certain prepayments and fair value
adjustment of investment property.
Restructuring costs were incurred in connection with the Company’s
debt restructuring process.
A net fi nance loss of €39.3 million was recorded in 2013 compared
to a net fi nance cost of €17.2 million in 2012.
Finance income decreased to €1.3 million from €20.4 million in
2012 mainly due to no income being recorded in connection to its
buyback programme (2012: €4.3 million income) as the Company
ceased this activity in order to preserve short-term liquidity. In
addition, no income resulted from hedging activity through selling
currency options (2012: €11.7 million) as hedging activity was
reduced also in order to preserve short-term liquidity.
40
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
R
E
V
I
E
W
Finance expenses increased from €37.5 million to €40.6 million
Plaza has on its balance sheet a €40 million investment in equity
(after capitalization of borrowing costs of €6.5 million in 2013 and
accounted investees which includes a joint venture project
€19.1 million in 2012). The main reasons for this increase were:
reclassifi ed in accordance with IFRS 11. The only operating asset
• discontinuing of capitalization of interest on debentures in H2
currently classifi ed under this heading is Riga Plaza. The value has
2013, resulting in an additional €3 million of expenses being
decreased from the 2012 fi gure of €161.7 mainly as result of the
refl ected in the profi t or loss;
dissolution of the US holding entity (totalling €32 million), disposals
• loss on the reissuance of bonds previously bought back (2013 -
(totalling €21 million), writedowns (totalling €56 million) and the
€5.7 million, 2012 - nil);
effect of the changes in exchange rates (totalling €15 million).
• increase in foreign exchange loss on bonds (2013 - €5.4 million,
2012 - €2.0 million).
This was partly offset by the decrease in the expense recorded due to
the increase in the fair value of bonds (2013 - €13.2 million, 2012 - €19.0 million)
Total bank borrowings (long and short-term) amounted to €175.5
million (31 December 2012: €206 million). This decrease is primarily
the result of loans disposed of and repaid during the year. All loans
were accounted for as current liabilities following the suspension of
A tax benefi t of €6.3 million recorded in the consolidated income
payments by Plaza and the uncertainty surrounding the restructuring
statement mainly represents the decrease in the deferred tax liability,
plan.
primarily in connection with the fair value changes of the debentures
measured through the profi t or loss.
Apart from bank fi nancing, Plaza has a balance sheet liability of
€168.6 million (with an adjusted par value of circa €201.5 million,
As a result of the above, the loss for the year amounted to circa
including unpaid interest) from issuing debentures on the Tel
€218 million in 2013, compared to €86.1 million in 2012. Basic and
Aviv Stock Exchange and to Polish institutional investors. These
diluted loss per share for 2013 was €0.73 (2012: €0.29).
debentures are presented at their fair value with the exception of the
debentures issued from August 2009 onward, which are presented
Balance sheet and cash fl ow
at amortised cost.
The balance sheet as at 31 December 2013 showed total assets of
€586 million compared to total assets of €886 million at the end of
2012. The decrease was mainly driven by the writedown of trading
properties and equity accounted investees, as well as the disposal of
assets and cash used for repayment of debt.
Provisions are booked in connection with the Company’s Casa Radio
project in Bucharest Romania.
As at 31 December 2013, the net balance of the Company, with its
controlling shareholders, is a liability of approximately €0.9 million.
The Company’s consolidated cash position (including restricted bank
deposits, short-term deposits and held for trading fi nancial assets)
decreased to €33.7 million (31 December 2012: €65.8 million).
Gearing increased to 64% (31 December 2012: 50%) as a result of
impairment losses and fi nance costs incurred during the year.
Other current liabilities have increased in 2013 from €7.6 million to
€11.2 million. The increase is attributable to unpaid debenture and
bank loan interest and the advance payment received in respect of
the sale of Koregaon Park.
The value of investment property decreased from €14.5 million in
2012 to nil in 2013, due to the sale of the Prague 3 project in the
Czech Republic, the sole investment property at the end of the 2012.
Trading properties decreased from €612 million in 2012 to €495
million in 2013 mainly as result of writedowns booked in the period.
At the end of the year, excluding Koregaon Park for which a sale and
purchase agreement was signed before year end, trading properties
were classifi ed as non-current assets due to uncertainties about the
development and realization dates.
The total equity decreased from the fi gure of €443 million in 2012
to €210 million in 2013 as a result of a €14 million increase in
the translation reserve connected to the Indian operations of the
Company stemming from the weakening of the Indian Rupee against
the EUR during the year (app 17% devaluation), and the €218 million
loss suffered mainly due to the writedowns, turning the retained
earnings of €189 million into retained losses of €29 million.
Roy Linden
Chief Financial Offi cer
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
41
I
E
W
C
E
N
V
A
E
N
R
R
S
E
V
S
O
E
N
G
S
D
U
N
B
A
I
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Valuation
summary by
Cushman and
Wakefi eld
as at 31 December 2013 (in EUR)1
Country
Project name
Market Value of
the land and project
31 December 2012*
Market Value of
the land and project
31 December 2013
Market Value
upon completion
31 December 2012*
Market Value
upon completion
31 December 2013
Hungary
Poland
Czech Republic
Romania
Arena Plaza extension
Dream Island
David House
Új Udvar Shopping Center
Torun´ Plaza
Zgorzelec Plaza
Suwałki Plaza
Łódz´ (Residential)
Łódz´ Plaza
Leszno Plaza
Kielce Plaza
Prague 3
Liberec Plaza
Roztoky
Palazzo Ducale
Casa Radio Plaza
Timis¸oara Plaza
Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc)
Târgu Mures¸
Hunedoara Plaza
Slatina Plaza
Ias¸i Plaza
Constant¸a Plaza
8,500,000
20,900,000
4,000,000
2,940,000
109,600,000
18,900,000
46,800,000
8,400,000
8,600,000
1,900,000
4,800,000
14,460,000
29,400,000
2,800,000
1,950,000
168,150,000
11,000,000
7,100,000
6,100,000
2,900,000
1,800,000
13,100,000
10,000,000
7,800,000
SOLD
3,950,000
SOLD
97,580,000
17,125,000
43,525,000
6,500,000
7,925,000
1,719,000
5,350,0003
SOLD
17,675,000
SOLD
1,800,000
130,613,000
10,825,000
5,620,000
6,175,0003
2,375,000
1,650,000
11,550,000
6,300,000
67,842,000
223,905,000
4,000,000
2,940,000
109,600,000
18,900,000
46,800,000
n/a2
82,972,000
26,000,000
n/a2
157,905,000
29,400,000
18,190,000
1,950,000
331,701,000
68,189,000
19,322,000
n/a2
n/a2
n/a2
93,550,000
13,873,000
88,941,000
SOLD
3,950,000
SOLD
97,580,000
17,125,000
43,525,000
89,331,000
74,214,000
n/a2
75,502,000
SOLD
17,675,000
SOLD
1,800,000
622,880,000
76,965,000
14,868,000
72,344,000
9,959,000
40,920,000
94,946,000
n/a2
Latvia
Riga Plaza
42,350,000
43,863,000
42,350,000
43,863,000
Greece
Pireas Plaza
21,000,000
15,300,000
98,500,000
94,555,000
India
Koregaon Park Plaza
Kharadi Plaza
Trivandrum Plaza
Bangalore
Kochi Island
Chennai
55,866,000
15,393,000
7,330,000
14,486,000
5,149,000
10,731,000
SOLD4
SOLD
SOLD
12,251,000
n/a
11,272,000
67,779,000
67,297,000
46,779,000
119,722,000
n/a2
42,701,000
SOLD4
SOLD
SOLD
90,665,000
n/a
39,899,000
Bulgaria
Shumen Plaza
4,600,000
2,125,000
n/a2
31,260,000
Serbia
TOTAL
Belgrade Plaza (MUP)
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka)
Kragujevac Plaza
19,700,000
20,000,000
42,100,000
16,150,000
19,025,000
41,775,000
138,600,000
107,159,000
42,100,000
145,729,000
108,309,000
41,775,000
762,805,000
547,818,000
2,090,026,000
2,038,580,000
* 2012 comparatives are based on a Jones Lang LaSalle report.
1 Rounded to nearest thousand.
2 Assets were valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was
estimated.
3 In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used
in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.
4 The Company signed an agreement for the sale of Koregaon Park Plaza and therefore no
valuation was conducted. The book value of the asset is circa €40 million.
Notes: All values of land and project assume full planning consent for the proposed use.
Plaza Centers had a 50% interest in the Riga Plaza shopping center development.
Plaza Centers had a 35% interest in the Új Udvar shopping center development.
Plaza Centers had a 50% interest in Kharadi Plaza and Trivandrum Plaza.
Plaza Centers had a 43.5% interest in Dream Island.
Plaza Centers has a 75% share of Casa Radio Plaza.
Plaza Centers has a 25% share of Bangalore.
Plaza Centers has a 40% share of Chennai.
All the fi gures refl ect Plaza’s share.
42
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Management
structure
Plaza Centers’ Board
Executive Directors
Mordechay Zisser
Founder
Ran Shtarkman
President and CEO
Marco Wichers
Chairman and Independent
Non-executive Director
Marius van Eibergen Santhagens
Independent
Non-executive Director
Shimon Yitzchaki
Non-executive Director
Sarig Shalhav
Non-executive Director
Senior Management
Ran Shtarkman
President and CEO
Roy Linden
CFO
Uzi Eli
General Counsel
Yaron Moryosef
Chief Engineer
Therese Keys
CEE Management and Leasing
Director
Functional Management Support
Local Country Management
Dori Keren
Country Director
Poland
Sagiv Meger
Country Director
Czech Republic, Serbia and Balkan States
Luc Ronsmans
Country Director
The Netherlands and Romania
Oren Kolton
Country Director
India
Bulgaria and Greece are being managed
from Poland and Romania
• Oversight of company
strategy and all project
development decisions
• Wide-ranging property
development expertise
• Review and approval
of business plan and
budgets
• Active management
and monitoring of
development risks
• Experienced
property development
professionals with global
property development
expertise
• Responsible for sourcing
development projects
• Development of
business plans
• Overseeing the
management of
development projects
• Extensive local
experience
• Cultivating connections
within market to source
opportunities
• Day-to-day management
of local operations and
developments
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
43
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Board of
Directors
and Senior
management
Executive directors
Mordechay Zisser, Founder and Executive Director
(male, 58, Israeli)
Mordechay Zisser is the Founder and Executive Director of Plaza
Centers. During more than 25 years’ of entrepreneurship and active
involvement in some of the world’s most prestigious real estate
developments, he has led successful projects in Israel, Western
Europe, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), South Africa and India.
Mr Zisser was appointed as Executive Director of the Board of
Directors of the Company on 17 August 2006. Mr Zisser also served
as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from
17 August 2006 until 22 November 2011.
Ran Shtarkman, President and CEO (male, 46, Israeli)
Ran Shtarkman (CPA, MBA) joined Plaza Centers in 2002, becoming
Chief Financial Offi cer in 2004 and CEO in September 2006. He was
additionally appointed as Executive Director on 12 October 2006
(and reappointed in 2008 and in 2011 for an additional three years),
as President in 2007. Previous roles include CFO of SPL Software
Ltd., Finance and Administration Manager for Continental Airlines’
Israeli operations and Controller of Natour Ltd.
Independent Non-executive directors
Marco Wichers, Chairman (male, 54, Dutch)
Marco Wichers is the CEO and Owner of AMGEA Holding B.V. and
the CEO of real estate consultancy AMGEA Vastgoed Adviseurs B.V.
Previously he was the CEO of two New York-based manufacturing
companies – Branco International Inc. (1988-1995) and Cravat Club
Inc. (1983-1995), which he also owned. Mr Wichers was appointed
as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on 1 November 2006,
reappointed in 2009 and in 2012 for an additional three years.
Mr Wichers was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors
of the Company on 22 November 2011.
Marius van Eibergen Santhagens, Senior Independent
Director (male, 62, Dutch)
Marius van Eibergen Santhagens has over 20 years’ corporate
fi nance experience. From 1985 to 1996 he held various director
positions with Generale Bank Nederland N.V., part of the Fortis
Group. From 1996 to 2003 Mr van Eibergen Santhagens was a
registered interim manager consulting at various middle sized
international operating companies. From 1999 to 2008 he was
Managing Director of Leisure Investments & Finance B.V., a
corporate fi nance company focused on the leisure industry, active
in the EU and the Caribbean. Since 2005 he has been Non-executive
Director with Engel East Europe N.V., a developer of real estate
in Eastern Europe. Presently he is Managing Director of Stichting
Amazon Teak Foundation, handling a €200 million investment in
teak wood in Brazil. Mr van Eibergen Santhagens was appointed as
Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on 1 November 2006, and
reappointed in 2009 and in 2012 for an additional three years.
Non-executive directors
Shimon Yitzchaki (male, 58, Israeli)
Shimon Yitzchaki (CPA), Chairman of Elbit Imaging Ltd. (the
Company’s indirect controlling shareholder) since January 2010
(prior to that he was the President of Elbit Imaging Ltd. since 1999).*
Mr Yitzchaki has been with the Europe Israel Group since 1985 and
has held several positions within the Group, among which, he served
as Executive Director of Plaza Centers for the period commencing
on 3 March 2000 and ending on 12 October 2006, thereafter he was
appointed as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers for a period of
three years and reappointed in 2010 for an additional three years.
Sarig Shalhav (male, 41, Dutch)
Sarig Shalhav (LLM) is a lawyer and tax counsel and has extensive
experience on commercial real estate and real estate fi nance
transactions and advises multinational businesses, government
agencies, private equity houses and banks on a wide range of real
estate and real estate fi nance related matters. In addition he acts
as a counsel in restructuring and enforcement scenarios, buyout
and venture capital transactions. Mr Shalhav has been working with
leading law fi rms and major audit & tax corporations. Mr Shalhav
was appointed as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on
19 December 2013.
* Since 14 March 2014, Mr Yitzchaki is no longer the President of Elbit Imaging Ltd.
44
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Senior management
Roy Linden (37) BBA, CPA (USA, Isr), Chief Financial Offi cer
Roy Linden joined Plaza Centers in November 2006 and acts as the
Group’s CFO. Prior to joining the Company, he spent nearly four
years at KPMG in Hungary, acting as manager in the real estate desk,
specializing in auditing, business advisory, local and international
taxation for companies operating throughout the CEE region. He also
spent three years at Ernst and Young in Israel, as a senior member
of an audit team specialized in high-tech companies.
Yaron Moryosef (40) BSc, Chief Engineer
Yaron Moryosef joined Plaza Centers in 2007. Prior to joining
the Company he acted as the site engineer of the Arena Herzelia
shopping and entertainment center, which was developed by Elbit
Imaging Ltd. At the Company he was acting as the project manager
of Romanian projects. In 2010, he became the Company’s Country
Chief Engineer in Romania and on 1 August 2012 was appointed as
the Group’s Chief Engineer and Head of Construction.
Uzi Eli (38), LLB, Attorney at Law (Israeli), MBA, General Counsel
and Compliance Offi cer
Uzi Eli joined Plaza Centers as the Group’s General Counsel and
Compliance Offi cer in 2007. Prior to joining the Company, he
practiced law in two of the leading commercial legal fi rms in Israel.
His main practice was concentrated in commercial and corporate
law, providing ongoing legal services to corporate clients (mainly
to hi-tech and bio-tech companies, and venture capital funds) in
all aspects of corporate governance, and representation in various
transactions, such as fi nancing and M&A transactions and other
wide varieties of licensing and technology transactions.
Dori Keren (44), BA, MBA, BB in Accounting, Poland
Country Director
Dori Keren joined Plaza Centers in 2006 as Financial Director of
Poland and Latvia and was appointed Poland Country Director in
2013. Prior thereto, he worked in Israel for 10 years in variety of
fi nancial jobs in positions which accompany business activity as
Economist, Financial Controller and CFO.
Oren Kolton (38), Republic of India Country Director
Oren Kolton has served as the India Country Director for Elbit
Imaging Group ventures in India since January 2010. From mid
2007 to December 2009 Mr Kolton has served as Elbit’s Vice
President of Business Development Asia. Prior to joining the
Elbit Imaging Group in April 2005, Mr Kolton served as a faculty
member at the Civil Engineering faculty, in the Technion – the Israel
Institute of Technology, where he was involved in research and
taught Undergraduate Management Courses. Mr Kolton holds a BSc
(magna cum laude) in Civil Engineering and MSc in Construction
Management from the Technion, and an MBA in Financing and
Marketing from the Tel Aviv University.
Sagiv Meger (36), Czech Republic, Serbia and Balkan States
Country Director
Sagiv Meger joined the Company in late 2007 as the Country
Director of Plaza Centers Serbia and was appointed as Country
Director of the Czech Republic in 2009. Prior to joining Plaza
Centers he was the COO of a company based in Angola, Africa
for four years, supporting over 50 various projects, ranging from
telecommunications, real estate, agriculture to military intelligence.
He gained an extensive range of fi rst-hand experience in previous
management positions.
Luc Ronsmans (63), MBA, The Netherlands and Romania
Therese Keys (43), BBus (Marketing), CEE Management and
Country Director
Luc Ronsmans joined the Europe Israel Group in 1999. Located
in Amsterdam and Bucharest, he acts as manager for European
operations for both the Company and its Group affi liates. Prior to
joining the Europe Israel Group, he was active in the banking sector,
holding managerial positions with Manufacturers Hanover Bank,
Continental Bank (Chicago), AnHyp Bank and Bank Naggelmachers
in Belgium.
Leasing Director
Therese Keys has joined the Plaza team in January 2013, as CEE
Management and Leasing Director. Prior to joining Plaza Centers, Ms
Keys was involved for nine years in land acquisition and commercial,
and residential development in the Balkans. Before moving to
Eastern Europe Ms Keys worked for 10 years in the shopping center
industry in Australia, initially with the Stockland Trust Group, and
then The Westfi eld Group. Roles in these companies included
development, management, marketing and leasing of shopping
centers.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
45
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Directors’
report*
Principal activities and review of business
Going concern
Plaza Centers N.V. is a leading developer of shopping and
On 14 November 2013 the Company announced that it will be
entertainment centers with a focus on the emerging markets of
freezing payments to all its lenders and will be entering into
Central and Eastern Europe (“CEE”), where it has operated since
negotiations with these creditors to arrive at an agreed debt
1996 when it became the fi rst company to develop western-style
arrangement (restructuring plan). The Company’s proposed debt
shopping and entertainment centers in Hungary. This followed
arrangement includes a potential of equity injection from the
its early recognition of the growing middle class and increasingly
owners in the amount of circa 20 million EUR via a right issuance,
affl uent consumer base in such markets.
a delay of all the bond series’ principal payment by three years,
a realization plan under which 19 of the 30 assets are estimated
Since then, it has expanded its CEE operations into Poland, the
to be realized by 2018 for circa 383 million EUR (net proceeds),
Czech Republic, Latvia, Romania and Serbia. In addition, the Group
a transfer of 75% of the net proceeds of realizations to the
has extended its area of operations beyond the CEE into India and
bondholders as early repayment, compensate the bondholders with
the US. The Group has been present in real estate development
an additional 1.5% annual interest, and additional compensation to
in emerging markets for over 18 years. To date, the Group has
the bondholders with equity instruments (share issuance without
developed, let and opened 33 shopping and entertainment centers
additional proceeds), being shares issued representing 13.5% of the
and one offi ce building. 21 of these centers were acquired by
Company’s outstanding shares.
Klépierre, one of the largest shopping center owners/operators in
Europe. Four additional shopping and entertainment centers were
Management believes that the implementation of the restructuring
sold to the Dawnay Day Group, one of the leading UK institutional
plan will provide the Company with the ability to resolve its
property investors at that time and one shopping center (Arena
immediate liquidity situation in order to continue operating as going
Plaza in Budapest, Hungary) was sold to Active Asset Investment
concern and preserve value for its shareholders and creditors.
Management (“aAIM”), a UK commercial property investment group.
The remaining seven centers which were completed during 2009,
Management acknowledges that signifi cant uncertainty remains over
2010, 2011 and 2012 are being held and managed by the Company,
the Group’s ability to meet its funding requirements and to refi nance
while utilizing the Company’s extensive experience in managing retail
or repay its debts as they fall due. If for any reason the Group is
assets.
unable to reach an approved restructuring plan, then this would have
an impact on the Group’s ability to realise assets at their recognised
For a more detailed status of current activities and projects, the
values, and to extinguish liabilities in the normal course of business
directors refer to the President and Chief Executive Offi cer’s
at the amounts stated in the consolidated fi nancial statements and
statement on pages 30 to 32 as well as to the following chapters:
ultimately result in the Group being unable to continue as a going
Overview, Business Review and Management and Governance.
concern. The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared
For an overview of subsequent events refer to note 38 to the
consolidated fi nancial statements.
Pipeline projects
on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Group will be able
to successfully complete its proposed debt arrangement.
Restructuring
On 18 November 2013, the Company applied for suspension of
The Company is active in seeking new sites and development
payments proceedings (surseance van betaling) under Dutch law
opportunities in countries in which the Company is currently
and simultaneously fi led a draft restructuring plan (ontwerpakkoord)
operating. The Company is also analyzing and contemplating to
(the “restructuring plan”) with the district court of Amsterdam, the
invest in further countries that meet its development parameters and
Netherlands (Rechtbank Amsterdam) (the “Court”).
investment criteria.
* Chapters 1 (Overview), 2 (Business review) and 3 (Management and governance) are part
of the Directors’ report.
On 18 November 2013, the Court granted the Company a provisional
suspension of payments, appointing Mr J.L.M. Groenewegen
as administrator (bewindvoerder) and Mrs L. van Berkum as
46
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
supervisory judge (rechter-commissaris). The court determined
during November and December 2013 decreased its holdings to
that no hearing should take place for deciding on the granting of
less than 10%. In addition, BZ WBK AIB Asset Management S.A.
defi nitive suspension of payments, order that, instead, a creditors
of Poland has disposed of its entire stake in Plaza and is no longer
meeting will take place to vote on the restructuring plan on
a shareholder. Other than that and except as disclosed under
26 June 2014 and determined that the Company’s creditors can fi le
“directors’ interests” above, the Company is not aware of any
their claims for voting purposes before 12 June 2014.
additional interests amounting to 5% or more in the Company’s
shares besides that of its parent company, Elbit Imaging Ltd.
Dividends
Following the withholding of payments of all corporate level debt
Issue of shares
and in line with the restructuring plan (refer to note 34(A)), the
Pursuant to the Articles of Association, the General Meeting of
Company’s management will commit to certain restrictions on
Shareholders is the corporate body authorized to issue shares and
dividends.
Directors’ interests
The directors have no interests in the shares of the Company, other
than the directors’ share options as given on pages 66 and 67 of this
report.
Directors and appointments
The following served as directors of the Company at
31 December 2013:
Mordechay Zisser, Executive Director
Ran Shtarkman, Executive Director, President and CEO
Shimon Yitzchaki, Non-executive Director
Sarig Shalhav, Non-executive Director
Marius van Eibergen Santhagens, Independent
Non-executive Director
Marco Wichers, Independent Non-executive Director, Chairman
The General Meeting of Shareholders is the corporate body
authorized to appoint and dismiss the directors. All directors in
function, unless they are retiring, submit themselves for re-election
every three years, pursuant to the rotation scheme for directors as
laid down in article 15.3 of the Articles of Association. The General
Meeting of Shareholders is entitled to suspend and dismiss directors
by a simple majority vote.
Substantial shareholdings
to disapply pre-emption rights. In each Annual General Meeting,
the General Meeting of Shareholders is requested to delegate these
powers to the Board. The scope of this power of the Board shall be
determined by the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders
to give the authorization. Typically, the Company requests in each
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders the authorization for the
Board to issue shares up to an aggregate nominal value of 33%
of the then issued share capital and an authorization for the Board
to disapply pre-emption rights which is limited to the allotment of
shares up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of 10% of the
then issued share capital. The authorization is valid for a period
ending on the date of the next Annual General Meeting.
Employee involvement
The Group has 136 employees and other persons providing similar
services. In 2012 the Group had 166 employees and other persons
providing similar services. The management does not expect
signifi cant changes in the development of the number of employees,
following reorganization process in recent years. The Company’s
employees are vital to its ongoing success. It is therefore important
that all levels of staff are involved in its decision-making processes.
To this end, the Company has an open culture and fl exible structure,
and staff are encouraged formally and informally to become involved
in discussions on the Company’s future strategy and developments.
Employee share option schemes were adopted on 26 October 2006
(as amended in October 2008, November 2011 and November
2012) and on 22 November 2011 which enables employees to share
directly in the success of the Company.
Currently ING Open Pension Fund (“ING”), Poland held
approximately 4.55% of the entire issued share capital of the
Company, Davidson Kempner Capital Management LLC held
approximately 5.54% of the entire issued share capital of the
Company. In March 2013, ING increased its stake to 11.8% and
Annual General Meeting (AGM)
The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is held every year
within six months from the end of the fi nancial year in order to
discuss and approve the Annual Report and adopt (vaststellen) the
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
47
plaza centers/management
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Dutch statutory annual accounts, discharge the directors from their
Company on such terms and in such manner as the directors may
liability for the conduct of business in the preceding year and any
from time to time determine, subject to certain conditions; (ix) to
other issues mentioned below.
re-elect as a director, Mr Mordechay Zisser; and (x) to re-elect as a
The main powers of the General Meeting of Shareholders relate
to the appointment of members of the Board, the adoption of the
All proposed resolutions were passed, except from the proposed
annual fi nancial statements, declaration of dividend, release the
resolution to authorize the Company to purchase its own shares
Board’s members from liability and amendments to the Articles of
under item (viii) herein above which was denied.
director, Mr Ran Shtarkman.
Association.
The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders was held at Park Plaza
Victoria Hotel Amsterdam, Damrak 1-5, 1012 LG Amsterdam, The
Netherlands on 20 June 2013 at 10:30 am (CET).
In this AGM, inter alia, the following resolutions were proposed
to the shareholders: (i) to approve the Company’s Dutch statutory
annual accounts and annual report being drawn up in the English
language; (ii) to consider the Company’s Dutch statutory annual
accounts and the annual report for the year ended 31 December
2012; (iii) to adopt the Company’s Dutch statutory annual accounts
for the year ended 31 December 2012; (iv) to discharge the directors
of the Company from their liability for the conduct of business
for the year ended 31 December 2012; (v) to resolve to pay no
dividend to the holders of ordinary shares in respect of the year
ended 31 December 2012; (vi) to authorize the Board generally
and unconditionally to exercise all powers of the Company to allot
equity securities in the Company up to an aggregate nominal value
of €980,714, being 33% (thirty-three percent) of the Company’s
issued ordinary share capital as at the date of this notice, provided
that such authority shall expire on the conclusion of the Annual
General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless previously renewed,
varied or revoked by the Company in a general meeting, save that
the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement
which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after
such expiry and the Board may allot equity securities in pursuance
of such an offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby
had not expired; (vii) to give a special instruction to the Board
authorizing it to disapply the pre-emption rights set out in article
6 of the Company’s Articles of Association, such power to expire
at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting to be held in
2014, and the Board may allot equity securities following an offer
or agreement made before the expiry of the authority and provided
that the authority is limited to the allotment of the equity securities
up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of €297,186; (viii)
to authorize the Company, generally and unconditionally, for the
purpose of article 8 of the Articles of Association of the Company,
to make market purchases of ordinary shares in the capital of the
Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM)
An Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders was held at Park
Plaza Victoria Hotel Amsterdam, Damrak 1-5, 1012 LG Amster-
dam, The Netherlands on 19 December 2013 at 10am (CET). In
this EGM, inter alia, the following resolutions were proposed to
the shareholders: (i) to honourably dismiss Mr Edward Paap from
his position as Non-executive Director; (ii) to appoint Mr Sarig C.
Shalhav as Non-executive Director; (iii) to authorize the Board to
generally and unconditionally exercise all powers of the Company to
allot equity securities (including rights to acquire equity securities)
in the Company up to an aggregate nominal value of €1,485,931,
being equal to 50% (fi fty percent) of the Company’s issued ordinary
share capital, provided that such authority shall expire on the
conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless
previously renewed, varied or revoked by the general meeting,
save that the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or
agreement which would or might require equity securities to be
allotted after such expiry and the Board may allot equity securities
in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if the authority
conferred hereby had not expired. If granted, this authorization shall
replace the authorization granted at the Annual General Meeting of
the Company on 20 June 2013 (AGM 2013); (iv) subject to passing
the proposed resolution under item (iii) above, to authorize the
Board to disapply pre-emption rights, limited to the allotment of
equity securities (including rights to acquire equity securities) up to
a maximum aggregate nominal amount of € 1,485,931, being equal
to 50% (fi fty percent) of the issued ordinary share capital of the
Company), such power to expire on the conclusion of the Annual
General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless previously renewed,
varied or revoked by the general meeting.
If granted, this authorization shall replace the authorization granted
at the AGM 2013.
The proposed resolutions on items (i) & (ii) above were passed and
the proposed resolutions on items (iii) & (iv) of the agenda were
denied.
48
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
directors’ report
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Article 10 of Directive 2004/25
With regard to the information referred to in the resolution of article 10
of the EC Directive pertaining to a takeover bid which is required to
be provided according to Dutch law, the following can be reported:
• There are no special restrictions on the transfer of the shares of
the Company.
• There are no special statutory rights related to the shares of the
Company.
• There are no restrictions on the voting rights on the Company’s
shares.
• Information on signifi cant shareholding can be found above.
• There are no agreements between the shareholders which are
known to the Company and may result in restrictions on the
transfer of securities and/or voting rights.
• The applicable provisions regarding the appointment and
dismissal of members of the Board and amendments to the
Articles of Association are set forth above.
• The power of the Board regarding the issue of shares and the
exclusion of pre-emption rights and the repurchase of shares in
the Company can be found above.
Poland, as well as Timis¸oara Plaza in Romania will be the next
centers to commence construction.
In light of market conditions at the time, in the second half of 2008
the Group took the strategic decision to scale back on starting
new projects and to focus on projects with availability of external
fi nancing and strong tenants demand. The Group currently plans to
progress in a selected number of projects which are: (i) Casa Radio
(Phase I) in Romania; (ii) Timisoara in Romania; (iii) Lodz Mall in
Poland; (iv) Belgrade Plaza (MUP) in Serbia; (v) Belgrade Plaza
(Visnjicka) in Serbia; (vi) Cina in Romania; and (vii) Chennai in India.
Plaza’s clear priority is to reach a successful conclusion with its
restructuring process whilst the Company continues to leverage
the ability and expertise of its management team, the quality of its
income generating assets, and its ongoing focus on deleveraging
its balance sheet to achieve success in its day-to-day operations. It
is this combination of factors that underpins the Board’s continued
confi dence that the Company retains signifi cant value for its
stakeholders and will be able to repay its creditors in full.
Plaza is on various stages of negotiation for selling part of its assets,
but currently there are no signed agreements or head of terms in
place except the agreement to sell Koregaon Park.
• There are no signifi cant agreements to which the Company is a
party and which take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of
control of the Company following a takeover bid.
The number of the Group’s employees changed signifi cantly in
the course of the past years, however following the restructuring
process (refer to page 8) no material change is expected for 2014.
• There are no agreements between the Company and its Board
members or employees providing for compensation if they
resign or are made redundant without valid reason or if their
employment ceases because of a takeover bid.
• Other information can be found in the notes to the fi nancial
statements (please see note 23 Equity).
Forecast
Plaza continues to evaluate its extensive development pipeline,
which it believes offers signifi cant opportunities. Plaza remain
prudent and pragmatic in its approach to deploying signifi cant
levels of equity to commence new projects. This being said, Plaza
continues to progress a limited number of projects in the most
resilient countries of CEE, such as Poland and Serbia, where GDP
growth and forecasts remain above the averages for Europe and,
as such, Visnjicka Plaza in Belgrade, Serbia, and Łódz´ Plaza in
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
49
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Corporate
governance
The Company was incorporated in The Netherlands on 17 May
• Best Practice Provision II.1.6 stipulates that the management
1993 as a private limited liability company (besloten vennootschap
board shall describe the sensitivity of the results of the Company
met beperkte aansprakelijkheid). The Company was converted into
to external factors and variables. Since the Company has no
a public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap) on 12
streaming/fi x annual revenue from operation of properties, it does
October 2006, with the name “Plaza Centers N.V.”. The principal
not perform such analysis.
applicable legislation and the legislation under which the Company
and the Ordinary Shares in the Company have been created is book
• Best Practice Provision II.2.4 stipulates that granted options
2 of the Dutch Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
shall not be exercised in the fi rst three years after the date of
The Company has the Ordinary Shares listed on the main market of
of options to a lockup period of three years. The reason therefore
granting. The Share Option Schemes do not restrict the exercise
the LSE and on the main market of the WSE.
Except as set out below, the Company complies with the Dutch
Code and the UK Code on Corporate Governance. The Company
acknowledges the importance of good corporate governance. The
Company has made an effort in drawing up internal corporate
governance regulations that comply, to the highest extent possible,
with the Dutch Code and the UK Code on Corporate Governance.
Where deviations from the Dutch Code or the UK Code on Corporate
Governance have been necessary, such has been indicated below.
The Company currently has six directors, two of whom are executive
directors and four of whom are non-executive directors, of whom
two are considered by the Board to be independent. The Board
believes that there is a satisfactory balance for the purposes of decision-
making at Board level in line with the provisions of the UK Code
on Corporate Governance, the Dutch Code and the WSE Corporate
Governance Rules.
Deviations from the Dutch Code in 2013
The Company has not applied a limited number of provisions from
the Dutch Code, as it has not considered them to be in the interests
of the Company and its stakeholders.
• Best Practice Provision II.1.3 stipulates, inter alia, that the
Company should have an internal risk management and control
system and that in that respect, it should have, inter alia, employ
as instruments of such internal risk management and control
system, a code of conduct which should be published on the
Company’s website. Such code of conduct is not available at the
date of publication of this document.
is that the Company and the Elbit Imaging Group share the same
remuneration policy and Share Option Schemes were drafted in
accordance with Elbit Imaging’s share option scheme, in order
to maintain the incentive for all employees of the Elbit Imaging
Group based upon the same principles.
• Best Practice Provision II.2.7 stipulates that neither the exercise
price nor the other conditions regarding the granted options
shall be modifi ed during the term of the options, except insofar
as prompted by structural changes relating to the shares of the
Company in accordance with established market practice. The
Company has on 25 November 2008 adjusted the exercise price
of the granted options and in November 2012 the Company
extended the option term from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from
the date of grant of the 2006 Share Option Scheme. This has been
done since the Board was of the view that the each Share Option
Scheme should serve as an effective incentive for the employees
of the Group, to encourage them to remain in employment and
work to achieve the best possible results for the Company and
the shareholders. Market conditions and the global economic
crisis that is still impacting the geographic regions and real
estate sectors in which the Company operates, however, led to a
strong decline in the Company’s share price at both the London
Stock Exchange and the Warsaw Stock Exchange, resulting in
practically all options being out of the money without a favorable
outlook for a quick recovery. In order to maintain the incentive
for all employees, the Board has submitted to the extraordinary
meeting of shareholders that was held on 25 November 2008,
a proposal to amend the 2006 Share Option Scheme and to
determine the exercise price of all options granted on or prior to
25 October 2008, to GBP 0.52 and to the extraordinary meeting
of shareholders that was held on 20 November 2012, a proposal
• Best Practice Provision II.1.4 (b) stipulates that the management
to amend the 2006 Share Option Scheme and to extend the
board shall provide a description of the design and effectiveness
option term from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from the date of
of the internal risk management and control system for the main
grant to be in line with the end date of the option term under the
risks. Such description is not available.
2011 Share Option Scheme, adopted by the extraordinary general
50
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
meeting of shareholders on 22 November 2011. In an attempt
as each Board member is obliged to notify all direct and indirect
to insure that the options are and remain an effective incentive
confl icts of interest, the Articles contain no specifi c approval clause.
and to assist in the retention of employees, and that the option
holders should have the opportunity to exercise their options until
• Best Practice Provision III.1.7 stipulates that the supervisory
the same end date as the holders of options under the 2011 Share
board shall discuss at least once a year on its own, both its
Option Scheme, the revised 2006 Share Option Scheme includes
own functioning and that of its individual members, and the
an extension of the vesting term for options granted less than one
conclusions that must be drawn on the basis thereof. The desired
year prior to 25 October 2008. The shareholders approved the
profi le, composition and competence of the supervisory board
amendments of the 2006 Share Option Scheme, the adjustment of
shall also be discussed. Moreover, the supervisory board shall
the exercise price and the extension of the option term.
discuss at least once a year without the management board being
present, the functioning of the management board as an organ
• Best Practice Provision II.2.12 and Best Practice Provision
of the company and the performance of its individual members,
II.2.13 stipulate, inter alia, that the remuneration report of
and the conclusions that must be drawn on the basis thereof. In
the supervisory board shall include account of the manner in
2013 the non-executive directors have not specifi cally discussed
which the remuneration policy has been implemented in the
the items that appear in this Best Practice Provision on separate
past fi nancial year as well as an overview of the remuneration
occasions. The Board, however, feels it important to notify the
policy planned by the supervisory board for the next fi nancial
shareholders that as a rule, every Board meeting includes an
year and subsequent years and should contain the information
assessment by all Board members of their own functioning and
specifi ed in these provisions. The current remuneration policy
that of their fellow Board members. The Board is of the view that,
of the Company has remained unchanged from 2006 at the
given the fact that the Company has a one-tier board rather than
moment the Company’s shares were admitted to listing and is
a separate management board and supervisory board, this course
fairly straight-forward, as such that “implementation” is not an
of action appropriately meets actual purpose of this Best Practice
issue. Furthermore, pursuant to the Articles, the General Meeting
Provision.
determines the remuneration policy, and not the non-executive
directors. When the remuneration policy needs amendment, this
• Best Practice Provision III.1.8 stipulates that the supervisory
will be addressed in a General Meeting.
board shall discuss at least once a year the corporate strategy
and the risks of business and the results of assessment by the
• Best Practice Provision II.3.3 and Best Practice Provision III.6.2
management board of the structure and operation of the internal
stipulate that both executive directors and non-executive directors
risks management and control systems, as well as any signifi cant
shall not take part in any discussion or decision-making that
changes thereto. In 2013, there have not been separate meetings
involves a subject or transaction in relation to which they have a
of the non-executive directors to discuss the items mentioned
confl ict of interest with the Company. Since 4 July 2013, Section
in this Best Practice Provision. The reason therefore is that
17.1 of the Articles of Association provide for this. Section 17.2
risk management at the Company is, pursuant to the internally
of the Articles of Association further stipulates that when as a
applicable corporate governance regulations, a matter specifi cally
consequence of the provision of Section 17.1. of the Articles of
reserved for decision by the full Board. Board meetings in 2013
Association, no board resolution can be passed, then despite the
have included discussions in respect of corporate strategy and
confl ict of interest, such resolution can be resolved by the Board
risk management and periodically throughout the year, the internal
provided that the resolution is adopted unanimously and in a
system of risk management has been assessed by the full Board.
meeting where all Board members are present or represented.
Best Practice Provisions III.2.1 and III.8.4 stipulate that the
• Best Practice Provision II.3.4 and Best Practice Provision III.6.3
majority of the members of the Board shall be independent
stipulate, inter alia, that decisions to enter into transactions in
non-executives within the meaning of Best Practice Provision
which there are confl icts of interest with management board
III.2.2. The Company currently has two executive directors (who
members that are of material signifi cance to the Company and/
are considered to be non-independent) and four non-executive
or to the relevant board members require the approval of the
directors out of whom two non-executive directors are considered
non-executive directors. As the Company has a one-tier board and
to be independent, applying the criteria of Best Practice Provision
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
51
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
corpo
III.2.2. The non-executive directors who are considered to be
• Best Practice Provision III.5.11, inter alia, provides that the
non-independent are Messrs Shimon Yitzchaki and Sarig Shalhav.
Remuneration Committee shall not be chaired by a non-executive
The independent non-executive directors are: Messrs Marco
director who is either a former executive director or a member
Habib Wichers and Marius van Eibergen Santhagens. See also
of the management board of another listed company. Since the
page 44 – Additional information for an overview of the directors’
Company’s Remuneration Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon
former and current functions. Consequently, two out of the six
Yitzchaki, who is a former Executive Director and serves as
directors are considered to be independent. The Board believes
President of EI, the Company deviates from this requirement.
that the experience of the non-independent directors is of great
The Board is convinced that the experience of Mr Yitzchaki in this
importance to the Company.
respect should be considered more important than the fact that
Mr Yitzchaki is a Board member of another listed company.
• Best Practice Provision III.3.3 and Best Practice Provision III.4.1
(a) stipulate that all supervisory board members shall follow an
• Best Practice Provision III.7.1 stipulates that non-executive
induction program. The composition of the Board has remained
directors should not be granted any shares and/or rights to
unchanged from 2006 until 19 December 2013, on which date Mr
shares by way of remuneration. Under the 2006 Share Option
Sarig Shalhav was appointed as Non-executive Director. Given the
Scheme, prior to the admission of the Ordinary Shares to
fact that the Board does not undergo frequent changes as to its
trading on the London Stock Exchange and thereafter, options
composition, there is currently no induction program in place.
were granted to Mr Yitzchaki. Furthermore, the Share Option
Schemes do not exclude the possibility of making further grants
• Best Practice Provision III.3.5 stipulates that a non-executive
of options to non-executive directors. In particular, the Board
director (in terms of the Dutch Code a supervisory director
believes that the granting of options to Mr Yitzchaki has been
(commissaris)) may be appointed to the board for a maximum
appropriate, given his extensive involvement in the Company to
of three four-year terms. Section 15 of the Articles provides for
date. Furthermore, the Company has retained the right to grant
a retirement schedule whereby directors who have been in offi ce
options to non-executive directors as it believes that granting
for not less than three consecutive annual general meetings shall
such options is appropriate in order to offer present and future
retire from offi ce. Pursuant to section 15.6 of the Articles, such a
non-executive directors a competitive remuneration package.
director may be reappointed, which could result in a term of offi ce
All proposals for remuneration in the form of shares or rights to
which is longer than three four-year terms.
acquire shares (options) will be submitted to the General Meeting
of Shareholders, pursuant to Section 15.7 of the Articles and book
• Best Practice Provision III.5.1 provides that the committee rules
2 of the DCC.
stipulate that a maximum of one member of each committee need
not be independent within the meaning of Best Practice Provision
• Best Practice Provision IV.3.13 stipulates that the Company
III.2.2 The Company’s nomination committee is comprised of
shall formulate an outline policy on bilateral contacts with the
three members, two of whom, Messrs Yitzchaki and Shalhav, are
shareholders and publish this policy on its website. All contacts
considered to be non-independent. The Board believes that the
between the Company and its shareholders are carried out in full
composition of the nomination committee as currently envisaged
transparency and therefore the Board considers such policy as
is in the best interests of the Company, given the skills and
not necessary.
experience of the committee members.
• Best Practice Provision V.2.1. stipulates that the external auditor
• Best Practice provision III.5.6 stipulates that the Audit Committee
may be questioned by the general meeting in relation to his report
must not be chaired by the chairman of the board or by a
on the fairness of the fi nancial statements and that the external
former executive director of the company. The Company’s Audit
auditor shall for this purpose attend and be entitled to address
Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, who has been
this meeting. As the experience is that the shareholders vote by
an Executive Director of the Company and thus the Company
proxy in a General Meeting of Shareholders, in the view of the
deviates from this Best Practice Provision. The Board, however,
Board, the presence of the external auditor is not required.
believes that given Mr Yitzchaki’s extensive fi nancial experience,
chairmanship of the Audit Committee is appropriate.
52
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
rate governance
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
• Best Practice Provision V.3 stipulates, inter alia, that the Company
the Company does not comply with this provision. However, the
should have an internal auditor. Though in fact the Company does
Board is satisfi ed that Mr Yitzchaki’s experience outweighs the
not have an internal auditor itself, the Company has a Quality
fact that he is not regarded as being independent.
Control Regulator, who practically functions as an internal auditor.
Deviations from the UK Code on
Corporate Governance
The Company did not comply with the following provisions of the UK
Code on Corporate Governance in the year ended 31 December 2013:
• Code Provision A.2.1 states that the division of responsibilities
between the Chairman and Chief Executive should be clearly
established, set out in writing and agreed by the Board. Whilst
the Company does not possess such a document, it believes that
the division of responsibilities between the Chairman and Chief
Executive is suffi ciently clear.
• Code Provision A.4.2 states that the Chairman should hold
meetings with the non-executive directors without the executive
directors present and, led by the Senior Independent Director,
the non-executive directors should meet without the Chairman
present at least annually to appraise the Chairman’s performance
and on such other occasions as are deemed appropriate.
• Code Provision B.6.1 states that the Board should refer in the
annual report as to how performance evaluation of the Board, its
committees and its individual directors has been conducted.
• Code Provision B.6.3 states that the non-executive directors, led
by the Senior Independent Director, should be responsible for
performance evaluation of the Chairman, taking into account the
views of executive directors. In 2013, the Chairman and the non-
executive directors did not meet separately. However, at every
Board meeting, an assessment is made by each Board member of
his/her own performance and that of other members. The Board
is of the view that this course of action provides an appropriate
mechanism for the evaluation of the performance of Board
members.
• Code Provision C.2.1 states that the Board should, at least
annually, conduct a review of the effectiveness of the Company’s
risk management and internal control systems and should
report to shareholders that they have done so. The Board did
not conduct a review of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk
management and internal control systems in the year under
review. However, the Board has established a process for
identifying and managing the risks faced by the Company and
both the Audit Committee and the executive directors regularly
consider the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and
risk management procedures as part of the on-going management
of the Company. The Board confi rms that any appropriate actions
either have been or are being taken to address any weaknesses in
these areas.
• Code Provision C.3.6 states (amongst other things) that, where
there is no internal audit function, the Audit Committee should
consider annually whether there is a need for an internal audit
function and make a recommendation to the Board, and the
reasons for the absence of such a function should be explained in
the relevant section of the annual report. Although the Company
does not have an internal auditor, the Company has access to a
quality control regulator who, in practice, functions as an internal
auditor.
• Code Provision E.2.3 states that the Chairman should arrange
for the Chairmen of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination
Committees to be available to answer questions at the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and for all directors to attend. In
the year under review, the Chairman of the Nomination Committee
and Audit Committee, Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, was unable to attend
the Annual General Meeting.
Compliance with WSE Corporate
Governance Rules
• Code Provision B.2.1 states, amongst other things, that a majority
The WSE Corporate Governance Rules (the Code of Best Practice for
of members of the Nomination Committee should be independent
WSE-Listed Companies) applies to companies listed on the WSE,
non-executive directors and that the Chairman or an independent
irrespective of whether such companies are incorporated outside of
non-executive director should chair the committee. Since the
Poland. The WSE Corporate Governance Rules consist of general
Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, who
recommendations related to best practice for listed companies
is a not regarded as being an independent non-executive director,
(Part I) and best practice provisions relating to management
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
53
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
corpo
boards, supervisory board members and shareholders (Parts II
to perform its duties, each Director has full access to all relevant
to IV). The WSE Corporate Governance Rules impose upon the
information. If necessary, the non-executive directors may take
companies listed on the WSE an obligation to disclose in their
independent professional advice at the Company’s expense.
current reports continuous or incidental noncompliance with best
practice provisions (with the exception of the rules set forth in Part
In line with the Dutch Code and the UK Combined Code, the
I). Moreover, every year each WSE-listed company is required to
Company has established three committees: an Audit Committee,
publish a detailed statement on any noncompliance with the WSE
a Remuneration Committee and a Nomination Committee. The
Corporate Governance Rules (including the rules set forth in Part I)
members of these committees are appointed from among the non-
by way of a statement submitted with the Company’s annual report.
executive directors. The terms of reference of the committees have
Companies listed on the WSE are required to justify non-compliance
been supplemented with additional provisions from the Combined
or partial compliance with any WSE Corporate Governance Rule and
Code. A brief description of the terms of reference of the committees
to present possible ways of eliminating the potential consequences
is set out below. The Board has also established an executive
of such non-compliance or the steps such company intends to
committee comprising the two executive directors and any relevant
take to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with such rule in the
senior managers or other personnel who may be invited. The
future. The Company intends, to the extent practicable, to comply
executive committee meets on a monthly basis to discuss, amongst
with all the principles of the WSE Corporate Governance Rules.
others, the status of contracts, including budgets, contingencies and
However, certain principles will apply to the Company only to the
risk management issues.
extent permitted by Dutch law. Detailed information regarding
non-compliance, as well as additional explanations regarding partial
compliance with certain Corporate Governance Rules of the WSE
due to incompatibilities with Dutch law, will be included in the
aforementioned reports, which will be available on the Company’s
website and published by way of a current report.
Board practices
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee comprises three non-executive directors
and meets at least three times each fi nancial year. Currently, the
Audit Committee is chaired by Mr Yitzchaki and the other members
are Messrs Wichers and van Eibergen Santhagens. The Audit
Committee must consider, amongst other matters: (i) the integrity
of the fi nancial statements of the Company, including its annual
In The Netherlands, statutory law provides for both a one-tier
and interim accounts, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
governance and a two-tier governance (the latter having a separate
controls and risk management systems; (ii) auditors’ reports; and
management board and a separate supervisory board).
(iii) the terms of appointment and remuneration of the auditor. The
committee supervises and monitors, and advises the Board on,
It is well established practice for international active companies in
risk management and control systems and the implementation of
the Netherlands to have a one-tier structure in the management
codes of conduct. In addition, the Audit Committee supervises the
board (raad van bestuur). Although all members of the management
submission by the Company of fi nancial information and a number
board are formally managing directors (bestuurders), the Articles
of other audit-related issues.
provide that certain directors have tasks and obligations which are
similar to tasks and obligations of executive directors and certain
directors which have tasks and obligations which are similar to tasks
of non-executive directors. The Articles provide that some directors
are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Company
and other directors are responsible for supervising the day-to-day
management of the Company. All responsibilities are subject to the
overall responsibility of the Board.
All statutory provisions relating to the members of the management
board apply in principle to all members of a one-tier board.
The Board meets regularly throughout the year. To enable the Board
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee, comprising three non-executive
directors, meets at least twice each fi nancial year to prepare
the Board’s decisions on the remuneration of directors and the
Company’s Share Option Scheme (Under Dutch law and the Articles,
the principal guidelines for directors’ remuneration and approval for
directors’ options and share incentive schemes must be determined
by a general meeting). The Remuneration Committee also prepares
a remuneration report which is included into the Company’s The
remuneration report may be found on pages 66 and 67.
54
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
rate governance
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Currently, the Remuneration Committee is chaired by Mr Yitzchaki
Shareholder. If a confl ict of interest arises between the Controlling
and the other members are Messrs Wichers and van Eibergen
Shareholder and the Company, the non-independent directors will
Santhagens.
take no part in the Board’s decisions on the matter.
Nomination Committee
Meeting at least twice a year, the Nomination Committee comprises
three non-executive directors. Its main roles are to prepare selection
criteria and appointment procedures for Board members and to
review the Board’s structure, size and composition. Currently, the
Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr Shalhav and the other
members are Messrs Yitzchaki and van Eibergen Santhagens.
Internal control - Risk management
The Board has established a continuous process for identifying and
managing the risks faced by the Company, and confi rms that any
appropriate actions have been or are being taken to address any
weaknesses.
It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to consider the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls, risk management
procedures, and risks associated with individual development
projects.
Share dealing code
Furthermore, the Articles stipulate that a member of the Board must
abstain from participating in the decision-making process with
respect to matters by which he has a direct or indirect confl ict of in-
terest with the Company. When as a consequence thereof, no board
resolution can be passed, then despite the confl ict of interest such
resolution can be resolved by the Board provided that the resolution
is adopted unanimously in a meeting in which all members of the
Board are present or represented.
Shareholder communication
The Company’s management meets with shareholders each year at
the Annual General Meeting (AGM) to discuss matters relating to
the business. If necessary, the Board may convene Extraordinary
General Meeting (EGM).
Details of this year’s AGM and EGM can be found on pages 47 and 48.
The Board is committed to maintaining an open, honest and positive
dialogue with shareholders.
To ensure that all its communications are factually correct, it is
The Company operates a share dealing code, which limits the
furnished with full information before every meeting on the state
freedom of directors and certain employees of the Company to
and performance of the business. It also has ultimate responsibility
deal in the Company’s shares. The share dealing code imposes
for reviewing and approving all information contained in its annual,
restrictions beyond those that are imposed by applicable law.
interim and other reports, ensuring that they present a balanced
The Company takes all reasonable steps to ensure compliance
assessment of the Company’s position.
by those parties affected. The Company operates a share dealing
code, particularly relating to dealing during close periods, for all
The main channels of communication with shareholders are the
Board members and certain employees, as is appropriate for a
Senior Independent Director, Chairman, CEO, CFO and our fi nancial
listed company. The Company takes all reasonable steps to ensure
PR advisers, although all directors are open to dialogue with
compliance by those parties affected.
shareholders as appropriate. The Board encourages communication
The share dealing code meets the requirements of both the Model
with all shareholders at any time other than during close periods,
Code set out in the Listing Rules and the Market Abuse chapter of
and is willing to enter dialogue with both institutional and private
the Dutch Act on the fi nancial supervision.
shareholders.
Controlling Shareholder
The Company has a Controlling Shareholder who owns
approximately 62.52% of the share capital and therefore has
effective control of the Company. To ensure that all transactions and
relationships between the Group and the Controlling Shareholder
are at arm’s length and on a normal commercial basis the Company
has entered into a relationship agreement with the Controlling
The Board also actively encourages participation at general
meetings of shareholders, which is the principal forum for dialogue
with private shareholders. As well as presentations outlining the
progress of the business, the Board includes an open question
and answer session in which individual interests and concerns
may be addressed. Resolutions put to vote and their results will be
published following the meeting.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
55
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
The Company’s website (www.plazacenters.com) contains
(Vaststellingsbesluit nadere voorschriften inhoud jaarverslag) of 23
comprehensive information about the business, and there is
December 2004 (as amended) (hereafter the “Decree”).
a dedicated Investor relations section where detailed fi nancial
information on the Company may be found.
For the statements in this declaration as understood in Articles 3, 3a
Corporate, social and ethical policies
The Company is responsible not only to its shareholders, but also
to a range of other stakeholders including employees, customers,
suppliers and the communities upon whom its operations have an
impact.
It is therefore the responsibility of the Board to ensure that the
Company, its directors and its employees act at all time in an
ethical manner. As a result, the Company seeks to be honest and
fair in its relations with all stakeholders and to respect the laws and
sensitivities of all the countries in which it operates.
Environment
and 3b of the Decree, please see the relevant sections of this annual
report. The following should be understood to be inserts to and
repetitions of these statements:
• Compliance with the provisions and best practice principles of the
Code (pages 50 to 55);
• The functioning of the Shareholders’ Meeting and its primary
authorities and the rights of shareholders and how they can be
exercised (pages 47 and 48);
• The composition and functioning of the Board and its Committees
(starting on pages 44, 54 and 55);
• The regulations regarding the appointment and replacement of
The Company regards compliance with environmental legislation in
members of the Board (page 47);
every country where the Group operates as its minimum standard,
and signifi cant levels of management attention are focused on
• The regulations related to amendment of the Company’s Articles
ensuring that all employees and contractors achieve and surpass
of Association (page 48); and
both regulatory and internal environmental standards.
• The authorizations of the members of the Board in respect of the
The Company undertakes a detailed environmental impact study of
possibility to issue or purchase shares (page 47).
every project the Group undertakes, including an audit of its waste
management, water and energy usage, emissions to air and water,
ozone depletion and more.
Health and safety
The Company regards compliance with environmental legislation in
every country where the Group operates as its minimum standard,
and signifi cant levels of management attention are focused on
ensuring that all employees and contractors achieve and surpass
both regulatory and internal environmental standards.
The Company undertakes a detailed environmental impact study of
every project the Group undertakes, including an audit of its waste
management, water and energy usage, emissions to air and water,
ozone depletion and more.
Corporate governance declaration
This declaration is included pursuant to Article 2a of the Decree
further stipulations regarding the content of annual reports
56
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Risk
management
Plaza mainly operates its business in emerging markets and
confi dence that the Company retains signifi cant value for its
therefore it is exposed to a relatively high degree of inherent
stakeholders and will be able to repay its creditors.
risk in such activities. The Management Board is responsible for
Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring
setting fi nancial, operational and strategic objectives as well as for
programme made on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good
implementing risk management according to these objectives.
progress towards resolving its liquidity situation. The market
The Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and
restructuring plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are
prices of the Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the
analyze the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits
moving forward.
and controls and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk
management policies are reviewed regularly to refl ect changes in
Alongside the management of the restructuring process, it is vital
market conditions and the Group’s activities.
that Plaza continues to look to the long-term objectives of the bu-
The Group Audit Committee oversees how management monitors
Plaza to progress with the initiation of projects and investment as
compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and
appropriate, including actively managing its income generating
procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management
assets to prepare for their ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify
framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.
exit opportunities from its remaining non-core assets.
siness. The deferral of the repayment of its debt maturities enables
Business strategy and proposed
restructuring plan
The Company is fl exible on decision making regarding the holding
and management of centers as opposed to selling them.
Plaza is focused on its businesses in CEE region and India
Due to the global crisis starting late 2008, the Company adjusted its
(emerging markets). By nature, various aspects of the emerging
activity to the markets’ condition and limited the commencement of
markets are relatively under developed and unstable and therefore
construction for projects, meeting the two major criteria as follows:
often exposed to risks arising from unforeseen changes, such
as legal, political, regulatory, and economic changes. Plaza’s
1 Projects enjoying intensive demand from tenants.
investments in emerging markets expose the Company to a relatively
high degree of inherent risk.
2 Projects that are based on external bank fi nancing which require
minimal equity investment.
Whilst the Company witnessed some confi dence returning for
prospects in Europe’s central and eastern regions, conditions in
many of its markets remained challenging in 2013 as the persistent
uncertainty created by the crisis continued to be felt. As such, and
as announced, despite Plaza’s efforts to progress asset disposals
and complete some alternative fi nancing transactions, the Company
took the decision in November 2013 to withhold payment on
the upcoming short-term maturities of its corporate bonds and
approach creditors with a restructuring plan. This was undertaken in
order to resolve its liquidity situation, safeguard the continuity of the
business and thereby protect the long-term interest of its investors,
creditors and shareholders.
The fact that Plaza has – to a certain degree – diversifi ed its business
over different markets (geographic segments) and sectors also
results in some risk mitigation. The Group is well diversifi ed and
active in eight countries in CEE and India.
In addition, to ensure knowledge and understanding of its business
environments, Plaza employs local employees and consultants, and
in some cases entering into local partnerships.
Capital management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to
maintain investors, creditors and market confi dence and to sustain
Plaza’s clear priority is to conclude the restructuring process
future development of the business. The basis of the Company’s
successfully whilst continuing to leverage the ability and expertise
stated dividend policy at the time of its IPO was to refl ect the
of its management team and the quality of the Company’s income
long-term earnings and cash fl ow potential of the Group, taking into
generating assets to achieve success in its day-to-day operations. It
account its capital requirements, whilst at the same time maintaining
is this combination of factors that underpins the Board’s continued
an appropriate level of dividend cover.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
57
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
ri
According to the Company’s dividend policy, dividends are expected
Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during
to be paid at the rate of 25% on the fi rst €30 million of such annual
the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the
net profi ts and thereafter at the rate of between 20% and 25%, as
period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to
determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, on any additional
64% in 2013.
annual net profi ts which exceed €30 million. As published on
23 September 2011, the dividend for 2012-2013 was subject to
A prolonged restriction on accessing the capital markets and
certain caps and conditions, which expired in December 2013.
additional fi nancing negatively affect Plaza’s ability to fund existing
The Company’s Board of Directors will continue to monitor overall
market conditions, ongoing committed capital requirements of the
As Plaza depends on external fi nancing and has high exposure to
Company, as well as expected future cash fl ow, before considering
emerging markets, Plaza bears the risks that due to fl uctuations in
any future dividend payments or payments from the Company’s
interest rates, exchange rates, selling yields and other indices, its
and future development projects.
general reserves.
Under the proposed restructuring plan Plaza’s equity will be
infl uenced, as follows:
The shareholders will be requested to provide capital/monetary
infl ow to the Company by way of rights issuance (“Equity
Contribution”) of €20 million as a pre-condition to the coming
into force of the debt restructuring plan. (It has not been formally
committed as of 30 April 2014).
The Company shall issue to holders of unsecured debt (i.e. out-
standing debt under the Israeli Series A and B Notes and the Polish
Notes) (“Unsecured Debt”) 13.5% of the Company’s shares (post the
Equity Contribution) for no consideration. Such issuance of shares
will be distributed among the holders of Unsecured Debt pro rata to
the relative share of each relevant creditor in the Deferred Debt.
fi nancial assets and debt value, cash fl ow, covenants and cost of
capital will be effected, thereby affecting its ability to raise capital.
As a basis for and contribution to effective risk management and
to ensure that Plaza will be able to pursue its strategy even during
periods of economic downturn, Plaza limits its fi nancial risks by
hedging these risks if and when expedient.
External factors infl uencing the results
The Company’s streaming/fi xed revenues are sensitive to various
external factors, which infl uence the fi nancial results. Such variables are:
• Market yield determining the valuation of the investment property,
and in certain circumstances the need for impairment of trading
property. The higher the market yields are the less the value
of the investment property and trading properties are, and the
probability for impairment is increasing; and
The Board seeks to maintain a balance between the higher returns
that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the
advantages and security afforded by a sound capital position.
Financing risk management
• occupancy rate of the operating malls together with the rental fee
level defi nes the rental income derived from the shopping center,
and the other component of the valuation of the investment
property. Higher occupancy rates and higher rental levels result in
better operating results, and also in higher revaluation gain from
Liquidity risk
investment property.
Despite ongoing efforts to complete a number of asset sales and
secure some alternative fi nancing transactions, Plaza had been
Interest rate risks
unable to conclude these deals within a timeframe that would
In view of Plaza’s policy to hold investments for the long-term
have enabled it to meet those payment obligations. Therefore, to
while exit yields are high, the loans used to fund this are also taken
ensure the long-term viability of the business, the Board agreed to
with long maturities. Plaza uses interest-rate swaps to manage its
approach the creditors of the Company with a restructuring plan so
interest-rate risk. This policy regarding the hedging of interest-rate
that a formalized restructuring process could be implemented. For a
risk is defensive in nature, with the objective of protecting itself
general, high-level and non-exhaustive brief summary of the material
against rising interest rates.
agreed commercial terms refer to note 34(A) in the consolidated
The Group incurs certain fl oating rate indebtedness and changes
fi nancial statements.
in interest rates may increase its cost of borrowing, impacting on
58
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
sk management
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
its profi tability. On a project by project basis, the Group considers
• Failure of the restructuring plan to be confi rmed by the Plan
hedging against interest rate fl uctuations or as sometimes required
Creditors, may lead to insolvency of the Company
to hedge by the lending bank.
The restructuring plan purports to enable the Company to
Foreign currency exchange rates
As Plaza’s functional currency is EUR, it is exposed to risks deriving
from changes in foreign currency exchange rates as some of its
purchases of services and construction agreements are conducted
in local currencies, or are affected by them. Its rental revenues may
also be denominated in local currencies.
The Group seeks to minimize these risks by ensuring that its
principal liabilities (fi nancing and construction) and its principal
sources of revenue (sale proceeds and rentals) are all denominated
in the same currency (namely the EUR), or are linked to the rate of
exchange of the local currency and the EUR. In order to limit the
foreign currency exchange risk in connection with its Debentures
issued, the Company has hedged the future payments to correlate
with the Euro under certain cross currency swap arrangements,
forward transactions and call options in respect of the Series A and
Series B Debentures previously issued, and may enter into similar
hedging arrangements (as necessary) in respect of each of the
Series of Debentures, subject to market conditions.
If the Company is not successful in fully hedging its foreign
exchange rate exposure, changes in currency exchange rates relative
to the Euro may adversely affect the Group’s profi t or loss and cash
fl ows. A devaluation of the local currencies in relation to the EUR, or
vice versa, may adversely affect the Group’s profi tability.
Furthermore, Plaza is monitoring its currency exposure on a
continuous basis and acts accordingly by investing in foreign
currencies in certain cases for which it expects that future
development projects will be purchased in foreign currency or when
cash fl ows denominated in foreign currency are needed according to
project construction budget. As a policy, the Group does not invest
in foreign currencies for speculative purposes.
The fi nancial statements include additional information about and
disclosure on Plaza’s use of fi nancial instruments.
The Company’s top risks
The following risks and related mitigation actions,
where applicable, are reported below:
continue its business operations in the forthcoming future inter
alia by extending the maturity of certain debt. If the restructuring
plan is not adopted by the required majority of the relevant
creditors or is, subsequently, not confi rmed by a fi nal decision of
the Dutch Court, or if certain undertakings under the restructuring
plan are not fully executed and on time, the Company may be
declared bankrupt and enter into liquidation proceedings. It
is uncertain whether the proceeds from the liquidation of the
Company’s assets will be suffi cient even to redeem outstanding
debt. Therefore, in a liquidation scenario, it is not unlikely that the
holders of Notes or Shares will lose their entire investment.
• Global fi nancial and economic developments
Risk description: Plaza’s fi nancial performance refl ects the
fi nancial turmoil of 2008 continued, as writedowns of trading
properties are refl ection of the ongoing economic uncertainty
in many of the countries in which Plaza operates. The global
economy is still fragile and a very slow pace of recovery cannot
be excluded. This could jeopardize Plaza’s development project,
profi tability and cash fl ows as demand and rents for shopping
and entertainment centers may decline and adversely affect the
Group’s fi nancial condition, results and prospects. Furthermore,
economic recession may detrimentally affect the ability of the
Group (where it has retained a development) to collect rent from
tenants, which could negatively impact cash fl ow and debt service
reserve covenants under its fi nancing facilities.
Risk mitigation: In reaction to the economic downturn, Plaza
has successfully initiated measures to reduce costs and focus
on commitment to reposition the business by raising €61
million through successful disposal of fi ve assets, and restrict
its commencement of construction projects to only the very
best opportunities focusing on projects with tenant demand and
availability of external bank fi nancing which require minimal
equity investment. Plaza will progress a selected number of
projects in the most resilient countries of CEE, such as Poland
and Serbia. These measures have been and will be pursued with
vigor. Market development will be closely watched and additional
measures will be taken if necessary. The Company continues
to make strong progress with its asset management initiatives.
Occupancy levels across the Company’s existing shopping and
entertainment centers continued to increase, reaching an overall
occupancy of 93%, footfall increased by 4% and the average
monthly turnover increased by 24.5%.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
59
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
ri
• The Group’s fi nancial performance is dependent on local real
announcement on 14 November 2013, that it will withhold
estate prices and rental levels
payment on the upcoming maturities of the Bonds and will
Risk description: There can be no guarantee that the real estate
approach the creditors of the Company with a restructuring plan
markets in CEE region and India will continue to develop, or
in a formalized restructuring process.
develop at the rate anticipated by the Group, or that the market
trends anticipated by the Group will materialize. In case the yields
Reduction in the credit ratings of the Group or deterioration in
will be high, such as some of the current market yields, the Group
the capital market perception of the Group’s fi nancial resilience,
will not be able to achieve substantial capital gains by selling the
could signifi cantly increase its borrowing costs, limit its access to
commercial centers.
the capital markets and trigger additional collateral requirements
in derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements.
Risk mitigation: Once assets are developed, and given the
Therefore, any further reduction in credit ratings or deterioration
Company’s fi nancial strength, Plaza is able to hold developments
of market perception could materially adversely affect the Group’s
on its balance sheet as yielding assets. Sales of assets will not be
access to liquidity and competitive position and, hence, have a
undertaken if offered yields are high and Plaza will capitalize upon
material adverse effect on the Group’s business, fi nancial position
its extensive experience gained over eight years of managing and
and/or results of operations. These material adverse effects could
running shopping malls effi ciently to hold and manage these as
also follow from a reduction in the credit ratings of the Controlling
income-generating investments in its portfolio, and continue to
Shareholder.
drive occupancy at these centers until suffi cient offered yields are
in place, subject to the restructuring plan.
Risk mitigation: Implementing the offered restructuring plan will
resolve our liquidity situation.
• Real estate valuation is inherently subjective and uncertain
Risk description: The valuation of property is inherently subjective
Plaza is making big efforts to raise external fi nancing for capital
due to, amongst other things, the individual nature of each
needs and continues reviewing fi nancing options available to the
property, and furthermore valuations are sensitive to change in
Company to achieve the most effective debt profi le.
market sentiment. As such, valuations are subject to uncertainty
and cash generated on disposals may be different from the value
Plaza is actively pursuing sales opportunities to generate cash
of assets previously carried on the Group’s balance sheet. There
which will contribute to the Company’s liquidity. The amended
is no assurance that valuations of properties, when made, will
maturity schedule of debentures and loans is detailed in the
refl ect the actual sale prices even where those sales occur shortly
restructuring plan on page 8.
after the valuation date. This may mean that the value ascribed
by the Group to the properties held by it may not refl ect the value
In addition, the Group maintains good relations with the fi nancing
realized on sale, and that the returns generated by the Group on
banks who remain supportive of companies with strong track
disposals of properties may be less than anticipated.
records.
Risk mitigation: Plaza will rely on its extensive experience and
• Plaza may be subject to risk relating to its co-investments,
knowledge of managing retails assets and strong relationships
because ownership and control of such investments are shared
with local and international retailers while using estimates
with third parties
and associated assumptions. These estimates and underlying
Risk description: Some of the Group’s projects (at the date of
assumptions are closely reviewed on an ongoing basis.
this document, Riga Plaza, Plaza Bas projects, the Casa Radio
• The Group’s borrowing costs and access to capital markets
are held through joint venture arrangements with third parties
depend signifi cantly on the Company’s credit ratings and
meaning that ownership and control of such assets is shared
market perception of the Company’s and the Controlling
with third parties. As a result, these arrangements involve risks
Shareholder’s fi nancial resilience
that are not present with projects, in which the Group owns a
development and two projects in India (Bangalore and Chennai)
Risk description: As of April 2014, the Company’s two series of
controlling interest, including:
Notes are rated “D” by Maalot. The update follows the Company’s
60
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
sk management
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
- the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner might at
comply with certain limitations, is subject to a governmental
any time have economic or other business interests that are
approval. With respect to the real estate sector, these limitations
inconsistent with the Group’s business interests;
include, among other things, a minimum investment and mini-
- the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner may be in
mum size of build-up land. In addition, under the FDI Policy it is
a position to take action contrary to the Group’s instructions or
not permitted for foreign investors to acquire agricultural land for
requests, or contrary to the Group’s policies or objectives, or
real estate development purposes. There is no assurance that the
frustrate the execution of acts which the Group believes to be in
Group will comply with the limitations prescribed in the FDI Policy
the interests of any particular project;
in order to not be required to receive governmental approvals.
- the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner may have
Failure to comply with the requirements of the FDI Policy will
different objectives from the Group, including with respect to
require the Group to receive governmental approvals which it
the appropriate timing and pricing of any sale or refi nancing of a
may not be able to obtain or which may include limitations or
development and whether to enter into agreements with potential
conditions that will make the investment unviable or impossible,
contractors, tenants or purchasers;
and non-compliance with investment restrictions may result in the
- the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partners may engage
imposition of penalties. This would have an adverse effect on the
in, or be perceived to engage in, disreputable conduct;
Group’s business and results of operations.
- the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner might
become bankrupt or insolvent; and
Risk mitigation: The Company conducts a thorough due diligence
- the possibility that the Group may be required to provide fi nance
procedure and acquires local legal advice prior to concluding any
to make up any shortfall due to the Group’s joint venture partner
transaction.
failing to provide such equity fi nance or to furnish collaterals to
the fi nancing banks.
Legal and regulatory risk
Disputes or disagreements with any of the Group’s joint venture
partners could result in signifi cant delays and increased costs
associated with the development of the Group’s properties.
Even when the Group has a controlling interest, certain major
decisions (such as whether to sell, refi nance or enter into a lease
or contractor agreement and the terms on which to do so) may
require joint venture partner or other third party approval. If the
Group is unable to reach or maintain agreement with the joint
venture partner or other third party on the matters relating to the
operation of its business, this may have a material adverse effect
on the Group’s reputation, business, fi nancial condition and/or
results of operations.
Risk mitigation: Plaza has very detailed agreements with all of its
partners that contain provisions that are supposed to limit the
risks and exposures mentioned above (e.g. deadlock provisions,
information and visitation rights provisions, etc.).
• Limitations by the Indian government to invest in India may
adversely affect the Group’s business and results of operations
Risk description: Under the Indian government’s policy on Foreign
Direct Investment (“FDI Policy”), an acquisition or investment
by the Group, in an Indian sector or activity in particular in the
shopping and entertainment centers business, which does not
Like all international companies, the Company is exposed to the
changing regulatory environment in the countries and regions where
it conducts business. Many of the CEE countries in which the Group
operates or intends to operate are countries that until the last two
decades were allied with the former Soviet Union under a communist
economic system, and they are still subject to various risks, which
may include instability or changes in national or local government
authorities, land expropriation, changes in taxation legislation or
regulation, changes to business practices or customs, changes to
laws and regulations relating to currency repatriation and limitations
on the level of foreign investment or development. The Group will be
affected by the rules and regulations regarding foreign ownership of
real and personal property.
The Group may be liable for the costs of removal, investigation
or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances located on or in
a site owned or leased by it, regardless of whether a member of
the Group was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or
toxic substances. The costs of any required removal, investigation
or remediation of such substances may be substantial and/or
may result in signifi cant budget overruns and critical delays in
construction schedules. The presence of such substances, or the
failure to remediate such substances properly, may also adversely
affect the Group’s ability to sell or lease the development or to
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
61
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
ri
borrow using the real estate as security. Additionally, any future sale
Changes to the tax laws or practice in the countries in which the
of the development will be generally subject to indemnities to be
Company operates or any other tax jurisdiction affecting the Group
provided by the Group to the purchaser against such environmental
could be relevant. Such changes could affect the value of the
liabilities. Accordingly, the Group may continue to face potential
investments held by the Company or affect the Company’s ability
environmental liabilities with respect to a particular property even
to achieve its investment objective or alter the post-tax returns to
after such property has been sold. Laws and regulations, as may
shareholders. The tax positions taken by the Group, including the tax
be amended over time, may also impose liability for the release of
effect of transfer pricing and the availability of tax relief provisions,
certain materials into the air or water from a property, including
are also subject to review by various tax authorities.
asbestos, and such release can form the basis for liability to third
Under the Dutch participation exemption rules, income including
persons for personal injury or other damages. Other laws and
dividends and capital gains derived by Dutch companies in respect
regulations can limit the development of, and impose liability for, the
of qualifying investments in the nominal paid up share capital of
disturbance of wetlands or the habitats of threatened or endangered
resident or non-resident investee companies, are exempt from
species. Any environmental issue may signifi cantly increase the cost
Dutch corporate income tax provided the conditions as set under
of a development and/or cause delays, which may have a material
these rules have been satisfi ed. The participation exemption rules
adverse effect on the profi tability of that development and the results
and more particularly the statutory conditions thereunder have
of operations of the Group.
most recently been amended with effect of 1 January 2010. Such
amended conditions require, among others, a minimum percentage
There is an increasing awareness of environmental issues in
of the share capital in the investee company requires that the
Central and Eastern Europe. This may be of critical importance in
investee company is not held as a passive investment (the ‘motive
areas previously occupied by the Soviet Army, where soil pollution
test’). If the motive test is not met, the participation exemption
may be prevalent. The Group generally insists upon receiving an
nevertheless applies provided that either the subject-to-tax-test or
environmental report as a condition for purchase, or alternatively,
asset test is met. To benefi t from the participation exemption regime
conducts environmental tests during its due diligence investigations.
during the entire holding period, the requirements must be met
Also, some countries such as Poland, Hungary, Romania and the
throughout the entire holding period. The participation exemption
Czech Republic require that a developer carries out an environmental
also applies to qualifying hybrid loans. Should the Company not
report on the land before building permit applications are
be in compliance with all participation exemption requirements or
considered. Nevertheless, the Group cannot be certain that all sites
should the participation exemption rules be amended, this will affect
acquired will be free of environmental pollution. If a property that the
its tax relief which could have an adverse effect on its cash fl ow
Group acquires turns out to be polluted, such a fi nding will adversely
position and net profi ts.
affect the Group’s ability to construct, develop and operate a
shopping and entertainment center on such property, and may cause
The Company has provided substantial amounts of loans to its
the Group to suffer expenses incurred in cleaning up the polluted
subsidiaries which are treated as hybrid loans and exempt under
site which may be signifi cant.
the participation exemption. Most of these loans are not covered
by a tax ruling confi rming the treatment for Dutch tax purposes.
While the Group makes every effort to conduct thorough and reliable
Therefore, there is a risk that a discussion arises with the Dutch tax
due diligence investigations, in some countries where former
authorities on the treatment thereof.
communist regimes carried out extensive land expropriations in
the past, the Group may be faced with restitution claims by former
Tax losses may be carried forward and set off against income of
land owners in respect of project sites acquired by it. If upheld,
the immediately preceding tax year and the 9 subsequent tax years
these claims would jeopardise the integrity of its title to the land and
and may be offset against any income of the companies currently
its ability to develop the land, which may have a material adverse
included in the fi scal unity as long as these remain part of the fi scal
effect on the Group’s business, fi nancial condition and/or results of
unity. If losses are considered so-called “holding and/or fi nancing
operations.
losses”, they may only be offset against income that is derived in
years that the Company also qualifi es as “holding and/or fi nancing
Relief from taxation available to the Group may not be in accordance
company” within the meaning of art. 20 (4) of the Dutch corporate
with the assumptions made by the Company and/or may change.
income tax Act 1969, provided that the net balance of intragroup
62
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
sk management
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
receivables has not increased compared to the relevant loss making
The system is based on the following three key principles:
year (unless there are suffi cient business reasons for such increase).
• the involvement of and taking responsibility by all personnel: all
If the Company were to be treated as having a permanent
employee, at his or her level, should exercise effective control
establishment, or as otherwise being engaged in a trade or business
over the activities for which he or she is responsible;
(including owning real estate outside the Netherlands), in any
country in which it develops shopping and entertainment centers or
• the full extent of the scope covered by the procedures: the
in which its centers are managed, income (positive and negative)
procedures should apply to all entities (operational and legal); and
Group employees contribute to internal control procedures; each
attributable to or effectively connected with such permanent
establishment or trade or business, is generally excluded from the
• separation of tasks: control functions should be independent of
Dutch tax base. Specifi c conditions may apply based on the relevant
operating functions.
double taxation treaty and Dutch domestic law.The occurrence of
one or more of these factors may have a material adverse effect
The internal control procedures designed to address the objectives
on the Group’s business, fi nancial condition and/or results of
described above cannot, however, ensure with certainty that
operations.
Financial Reporting
Plaza prepares an annual budget for each country, which budget is
compared with actual results. Investment budgets and cash fl ow
forecasts are also prepared. The quarterly fi gures are reviewed by
the external auditor prior to their publication by means of a press
release. The fi nancial statements are audited by the external auditor,
and the semi-annual fi gures are subjected to a limited review by the
external auditor.
these objectives will be achieved in full, since all procedures have
inherent limitations. However, they aim to make a very signifi cant
contribution in this direction.
II) Four components of internal control procedures
a) Organization and environment
Plaza’s internal control procedures distinguish permanent control
from periodic control, which are independent but complementary.
Permanent control is the responsibility of all Group employees. It is
linked directly to the business sectors, functions and subsidiaries.
Internal control and risk management
procedures
Managers of the business functions, country directors, aim to
ensure compliance with the Group’s internal control procedures,
whose tasks are:
I) Defi nition and objectives
• to ensure the methods chosen at Group level are coordinated and
Internal control is the structure within which resources, behavior,
implemented by their teams;
procedures and actions are implemented by the Executive Board
and throughout the Company to ensure that activities and risks are
• to design and adapt the reporting procedures on a regular basis,
fully controlled and to obtain the reasonable assurance that the
giving the most appropriate indicators to obtain clear visibility of
Company’s strategic objectives have been met.
their permanent control; and
Plaza’s internal control procedures aim to ensure:
• to regularly transmit this reporting to their superiors and indicate
• the optimization of operations and the smooth functioning of the
problems and incoherences in order to enable appropriate
Groups internal processes;
decisions to be taken regarding changes to the controls.
• compliance with current laws and regulations;
The powers of the Group companies’ legal representatives are
limited and subject to controls. Functional departments provide
• the application of instructions and directions given by the
expertise to operational departments. Permanent control procedures
Executive Board; and
require several participants. The involvement of many players
necessitates tight coordination of actions and methods. At Group
• the reliability of fi nancial information.
level, the coordination of permanent control is carried out under the
authority of the Head of Accounting and CFO, whose tasks are:
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
63
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
plaza centers/management
ri
• to ensure the design and implementation of actions to improve
d) Management and supervision of internal control systems
permanent control in the Group’s business functions;
Under the direction of the Executive Board, the activities and
functions managers carry out the supervision of the internal
• to coordinate the choice of methodologies and tools; and
control system with the support of the permanent control
• to monitor the development of the procedures in the business
per year. Its work and conclusions are reported to the Executive
coordination function. The Audit Committee meets at least twice
functions and subsidiaries.
Board. The supervision is also supported by the comments and
recommendations of the statutory auditors and by any regulatory
b) Risk management
supervision which may take place.
The Group is careful to anticipate and manage major risks likely
to affect the achievement of its goals and to compromise its
III) Risk management and internal control bodies
compliance with current laws and regulations. These risks are
The main bodies involved in managing the internal control system are:
identifi ed above in this section. The identifi cation and evaluation
of risks is used as a reference to determine procedures and
a) Executive Board
controls which, in their turn, infl uence the level of residual risk. The
The Executive Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s
procedures provide a framework for the activity, in a more precise
internal control systems. The Executive Board is tasked with defi ning
way where risks have been identifi ed, and their application provides
the general principles of the internal control system, creating and
a control mechanism.
implementing an appropriate internal control system and associated
roles and responsibilities, and monitoring its smooth functioning in
c) Control activities to meet these risks
order to make any necessary improvements.
The internal control and risk management system is based on two
levels of control as follows:
b) Audit Committee
First level – First degree – Permanent control
of the Group’s entire internal control system, changes made to
The fi rst level and fi rst degree of control is exercised by every
the system and the fi ndings of the work carried out by the various
The Audit Committee is informed at least once a year of the status
employee as part of his or her job-related tasks with reference to
participants working in the system.
the applicable procedures. Control is ensured on an ongoing basis
by the initiation of a task by operating employees themselves or by
c) Functional management
automatic systems for carrying out operations.
Business unit management defi nes the orientation and procedures
and provides guidance to employees in their business unit.
First level – Second degree – Permanent control
The second level is exercised by the management of the business
d) Group employees
function. Controls are carried out in the framework of operating
Operating supervisors and line managers are responsible for
procedures.
controlling risks and are the principal actors in permanent control.
Second level – Permanent control
The second level of control is intended to ensure that the fi rst level
controls have been carried out and respected correctly. It is under-
taken by separate functions, specially dedicated to permanent control.
Internal accounting control
A dedicated function within the Accounting Department is charged
with checking the smooth functioning of fi rst level accounting
controls. See section below “Internal control procedures relating
to the preparation and processing of the accounting and fi nancial
information”.
They exercise fi rst level controls.
Internal control procedures relating to
the preparation and processing of the
accounting and fi nancial information
I) Defi nition and objectives
The aim of accounting controls is to ensure adequate coverage of
the main accounting risks. They rely on understanding operational
processes and the way they are translated into the Company
accounts, and on defi ning the responsibilities of the individuals
64
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
and governance
sk management
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
responsible for accounting scopes and information system security.
outlines in terms of the balance and choice of resources, as well as
Internal accounting controls aim to ensure:
interest rate and exchange rate hedges. During the year, key fi nancial
transaction decisions are submitted individually for approval by the
• that published accounting and fi nancial information complies with
Board and Audit Committee, which also receives a summary of these
accounting regulations;
transactions once they have been completed. The processing and
centralization of cash fl ows, together with interest rate and exchange
• that the accounting principles and instructions issued by the
rate hedging, are the responsibility of the Financial & Accounting
Group are applied by all its subsidiary companies; and
Department, which keeps a record of commitments and ensures that
• that the information distributed and used internally is suffi ciently
reliable to contribute to processing accounting information.
III) Processes contributing to the preparation of accounting and
they are refl ected in the accounting system.
fi nancial information
II) Management process for accounting and fi nancial organization
a) Operational processes used to generate accounting information
a) Accounting organization
The fi nancial statements of Plaza are prepared centrally at Plaza’s
The production of accounting information and the application of the
corporate headquarters. The country departments are responsible
controls implemented to ensure the reliability of said information are
for collecting information from the local bookkeepers and applying a
primarily the responsibility of the Company Financial & Accounting
series of appropriate controls to their job functions, as defi ned in the
Department that submit information to the Group, and which
corresponding procedures. The Accounting Department has set up
certify its compliance with the internal certifi cation procedure. The
a system of internal collection and verifi cation of country data and
corporate and consolidated fi nancial statements are prepared by the
controls carried out. This system of control covers all Group entities.
Financial & Accounting Department, which reports directly to the
Executive Board. The department is charged with:
b) Processes used to prepare the corporate and consolidated
fi nancial statements
• updating accounting rules in view of changes in accounting
The fi nancial statements for the entire scope of consolidation are
regulations;
consolidated by the Accounting Department. At the end of each year,
the Executive Board validates the provisional fi nancing plan for the
• defi ning the various levels of accounting control to be applied to
following year, which sets out the broad outlines in terms of the
the fi nancial statement preparation process;
balance and choice of resources, as well as interest rate hedges.
During the year, key fi nancial transaction decisions are submitted
• ensuring correct operation of the internal accounting control
individually for approval. The processing and centralization of cash
environment within the Group, with particular reference to the
fl ows, together with interest rate and exchange rate hedging, are the
internal certifi cation procedure described below;
responsibility of the Investment Committee, which keeps a record of
commitments and ensures that they are refl ected in the accounting
• preparing and updating the procedures, validation rules and
system.
authorization rules applying to the department; and
c) The Audit Committee
• monitoring the implementation of recommendations made by
The clarity of fi nancial information and the relevance of the
external auditors.
accounting principles used are monitored by the Audit Committee
(whose role has already been specifi ed).
b) Financial risk management
The management of fi nancial risks, and in particular the fi nancial
structure of the Group, its fi nancing needs and interest rate and
exchange rate risk management procedures, is provided by the Finan-
cial & Accounting Department, which reports directly to the Executive
Board. At the end of each year, the Board validates the provisional
fi nancing plan for the following year, which sets out the broad
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
65
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Remuneration
report
Remuneration Committee
Remuneration policy
As stated in the Corporate Governance report on pages 50 to 56 of
this document, the Remuneration Committee meets at least twice each
fi nancial year to prepare, among other matters, the decision of the Board
relating to the remuneration of directors and any share incentive
plans. It is also responsible for preparing an annual report on the
Company’s remuneration policies and for giving full consideration in
all its deliberations to the principles set out in the Combined Code.
The committee comprises three non-executive directors – it is
chaired by Shimon Yitzchaki and the other members are Marius van
Eibergen Santhagens and Marco Wichers.
Under Dutch corporate law and the Articles of the Company, a
General Meeting of Shareholders must determine the principal
guidelines governing the remuneration both of executive and non-
executive directors. In addition, such a meeting also has to approve
the granting to them of options and share incentive plans.
The Board may only determine the remuneration of directors within
such guidelines, and no director or manager may be involved in any
decisions relating to his or her own remuneration.
Plaza Centers’ remuneration policy is designed to attract,
motivate and retain the high-calibre individuals who will enable the
Company to serve the best interests of shareholders over the long-
term, through delivering a high level of corporate performance.
Remuneration packages are aimed at balancing both short-term
and long-term rewards, as well as performance and nonperformance
related pay.
The Remuneration Committee reviews base salaries annually.
Increases for all employees are recommended by reference to cost
of living, responsibilities and market rates, and are performed at the
same time of year.
The Remuneration Committee believes that any director’s total
remuneration should aim to recognize his or her worth on the open
market and to this end pays base salaries in line with the market
median supplemented by a performance-related element with the
capacity to provide more than 50% of total potential remuneration.
2013
Executive directors
Mr Mordechay Zisser
Mr Ran Shtarkman
Subtotal
Non-executive directors
Mr Shimon Yitzchaki
Mr Marius van Eibergen Santhagens
Mr Edward Paap**
Mr Marco Wichers (Chairman)
Mr Sarig Shalhav***
Subtotal
Total – All directors
Salary and fees
incentive plan*
for the year ended
€’000
€’000
13 December 2013 €’000
Share
Total remuneration
222
452
674
-
67.7
65.7
67.7
2
203
877
-
-
-
112
-
-
-
-
112
112
222
452
674
112
67.7
65.7
67.7
2
315
989
There were no performance related remuneration in 2013.
* Accounting non-cash expenses recorded in the Company’s consolidated income statement
** Period from 1 January 2013 until 19 December 2013
*** Period from 19 December 2013 until 31 December 2013
in connection with the share option plan.
35
28
21
14
7
0
The shareholder returns performance 2013
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
66
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Service arrangements
The executive directors have rolling service contracts with the Company,
which may be terminated on 12 months’ and three months’ notice.
The non-executive directors have specifi c terms of reference. Their
letters of appointment state an initial 12-month period, terminable
by either party on three months’ written notice. Save for payment
during respective notice periods, these agreements do not provide
for payment on termination.
Bonuses
directors also have the authority to award discretionary bonuses
to outstanding employees which are not linked to the Company’s
fi nancial results.
Share options
The Company adopted its Share Option Schemes (“First ESOP”)
on 26 October 2006 (which was amended on 25 November 2008,
22 November 2011 and 20 November 2012) and on 22 November
2011 (“Second ESOP”) (refer to note 25 to the consolidated
fi nancial statements) the terms and conditions of which (except for
the exercise price) are regulated by the Share Option Schemes.
The Company has a performance-linked bonus policy for senior
Options will vest in three equal annual portions and have a
executives and employees, under which up to 3% of net annual
contractual life of fi fteen and ten years following grant date for
profi ts are set aside for allocation by the directors to employees
First ESOP and Second ESOP, respectively. In the course of 2013,
on an evaluation of their individual contributions to the Company’s
1,650,000 options were granted under second ESOP. For the
performance. In addition, the Board can award ad hoc bonuses
exercise and forfeit of options refer to the table below.
to project managers, area managers and other employees on
For further detailed information about share option schemes refer
the successful completion and/or opening of each project. The
to note 25 in the consolidated fi nancial statements.
Number
Number exercisable
of options granted
as at 31 December,
and unexercised
2012 and 2013
Exercise
price of
options £
Remaining
maturity
(years)
Mr Mordechay Zisser
Mr Ran Shtarkman
Mr Shimon Yitzchaki
Mr Marius van Eibergen Santhagens
Mr Edward Paap
Mr Marco Wichers
3,907,895
7,089,151
1,794,361
-
-
-
3,907,895
7,089,151
1,127,695*
-
-
-
0,43
0,43
0,43
-
-
-
7.8
7.8
7.8
-
-
-
Number of options
as at 31 December
2013
47,834,586
47,195,174
8,420,598
(13,883,438)
14,522,850
Total pool
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Left for future grant
* As at 31 December 2012: 827,695
Amsterdam, 30 April 2014
The Board of Directors
Mordechay Zisser
Marius van Eibergen Santhagens
Ran Shtarkman
Marco Wichers
Shimon Yitzchaki
Sarig Shalhav
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
67
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G
D
N
A
T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M
Statement
of the directors
The responsibilities of the directors are determined by applicable law
and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted
by the European Union.
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual report and the
annual fi nancial statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations.
On the basis of the above and in accordance with Best Practice Provision
II.1.4. of the Netherlands Corporate Governance Code, the directors
confi rm that internal controls over fi nancial reporting within the Company
provide a reasonable level of assurance that the fi nancial reporting does
not contain any material inaccuracies, and confi rm that these controls
functioned properly in the year under review and that there are no
indications that they will not continue to do so.
Netherlands law requires the directors to prepare fi nancial statements
for each fi nancial year that give, according to generally acceptable
standards, a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, fi nancial
position and profi t or loss of the Company and the companies that
are included in its consolidated accounts for that period.
Netherlands law requires the directors to prepare an Annual report
that gives a true and fair view of the position as per the balance
sheet date, the course of business during the past fi nancial year
of the Company and its affi liated companies included in the annual
fi nancial statements, and that the Annual report contains a proper
description of the principal risks the company faces.
Directors are required to abide by certain guidelines in undertaking
these tasks.
The directors need to select appropriate accounting policies and
apply them consistently in their reports. They must state whether
they have followed applicable accounting standards, disclosing and
explaining any material departures in the fi nancial statements.
Any judgments and estimates that directors make must be both
reasonable and prudent. The directors must also prepare fi nancial
statements on a “going concern” basis, unless it is inappropriate to
presume that the Company will continue in business.
The directors confi rm that they have complied with the above
requirements in preparing the fi nancial statements.
Throughout the fi nancial year, the directors are responsible for
keeping proper accounting records which disclose at any time and
with reasonable accuracy the fi nancial position of the Company.
They are also responsible for ensuring that these statements comply
with applicable company law.
In addition, they are responsible for internal control systems that
help identify and address the commercial risks of being in busi-
ness, and so safeguard the assets of the Company. They are also
responsible for taking reasonable steps to enable the detection and
prevention of fraud and other irregularities.
The Company’s website may be accessed in many countries, which
have different legal requirements. The directors are responsible for
maintaining the accuracy of corporate and fi nancial information on
the website, where a failure to update or amend information may
cause inappropriate decision making.
The fi nancial statements fairly represent the Company’s fi nancial
condition and the results of the Company’s operations and provide
the required disclosures.
It should be noted that the above does not imply that these systems
and procedures provide absolute assurance as to the realization
of operational and strategic business objectives, or that they can
prevent all misstatements, inaccuracies, errors, fraud and non-
compliance with legislation, rules and regulations.
In view of all of the above, hereby following the requirements of
article 5:25c paragraph 2 under c. of the Netherlands Act on the
fi nancial supervision (Wet op het fi nancieel toezicht), the directors
hereby confi rm that (i) the annual fi nancial statements 2013, as
included herein, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities,
fi nancial position and profi t or loss of the company and its affi liated
companies that are included in the consolidated fi nancial statements;
and (ii) the Annual report includes a fair review of the position at the
balance sheet date and the development and performance of the bu-
siness of the Company and its affi liated companies that are included
in the consolidated annual fi nancial statements and that the principal
risks and uncertainties that the company faces are described.
The Board of managing directors
Mordechay Zisser
Executive Director and Founder
Shimon Yitzchaki
Non-executive Director
Sarig Shalhav
Non-executive Director
Ran Shtarkman
Executive Director and CEO
Marco Habib Wichers
Independent Non-executive Director and Chairman
Marius Willem van Eibergen Santhagens
Independent Non-executive Director 30 April 2014
68
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
Suwałki Plaza, Poland
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
69
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
Independent
auditors’ report
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Plaza Centers N.V.
Report on the consolidated fi nancial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial statements of Plaza Centers N.V. (“the Company”), which comprise the consolidated
statement of fi nancial position as at 31 December 2013, the consolidated statement of profi t or loss and the consolidated statements of
comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash fl ows for the year then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of signifi cant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated fi nancial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated fi nancial statements in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to
enable the preparation of consolidated fi nancial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated fi nancial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in
accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated fi nancial statements.
The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated fi nancial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation
and fair presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated fi nancial position of the Company
as at 31 December 2013 and of its consolidated fi nancial performance and its consolidated cash fl ows for the year then ended in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU.
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to note 2(d) and note 34(a) in the consolidated fi nancial statements which describes,
among other matters, that the Company has withheld payment of installments on the Polish bonds as well as the Israeli bonds; and that the
Company fi led for reorganization proceedings with the District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. These conditions, along with other
matters as set forth in note 2(d) and note 34(a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast signifi cant doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Without qualifying our opinion, we also draw attention to note 3(g) and note 14 to the consolidated fi nancial statements which describes
that the Company early adopted IFRS 11 Joint arrangements with a date of initial application of 1 January 2013 and the effect thereof on the
consolidated fi nancial statements.
KPMG Hungária Kft.
Michael Carlson
Partner
70
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Budapest, Hungary
27 March 2014
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Consolidated
statement of
fi nancial position
December 31, 2013
€’000
December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
January 1, 2012
Restated* €’000
26,157
6,319
-
-
1,246
3,372
4,871
1,393
40,333
83,691
454,841
-
33,102
7,039
-
6,520
-
573
502,075
585,766
175,338
97,983
70,636
2,432
944
910
15,597
11,219
375,059
-
-
-
-
-
379
379
2,972
(40,651)
(20,706)
35,133
261,773
(28,799)
209,722
606
210,328
585,766
35,374
18,759
-
11,714
-
3,399
11,492
7,821
612,475
701,034
-
-
154,830
6,949
-
7,381
14,489
1,135
184,784
885,818
205,977
34,966
34,184
7,569
546
3,320
15,597
7,648
309,807
5,773
81,181
39,010
-
185
6,930
133,079
2,972
(26,359)
(20,706)
35,262
261,773
189,274
442,216
716
442,932
885,818
51,438
17,440
3,102
25,568
-
2,792
8,721
8,043
648,674
765,778
-
95,475
141,174
15,160
50,577
8,230
13,652
5,221
329,489
1,095,267
208,858
32,930
22,831
25,712
2,228
-
15,597
15,261
323,417
15,696
110,320
86,052
3,561
159
13,189
228,977
2,972
(10,672)
(19,342)
31,954
261,773
275,437
542,122
751
542,873
1,095,267
Note
6
7
8
8
9
10a
10b
11
11
37
14
14
12
13
16
20
21
17
18
15
11
19
16
20
21
15
22
23
23
23
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank deposits
Short-term deposits
Available for sale fi nancial assets
Held for trading fi nancial assets
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments and advances
Trading properties
Total current assets
Trading properties
Equity accounted investee - discontinued operations
Equity accounted investees
Loan to equity accounted investees
Long-term deposits and other investments
Property and equipment
Investment property
Other non-current assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Trade payables
Related parties liabilities
Derivatives
Provisions
Other liabilities
Total current liabilities
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Derivatives
Other liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Share capital
Translation reserve
Capital reserve due to transaction with Non-controlling interests
Other reserves
Share premium
Retained earnings (losses)
Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Company
Non-controlling interests
Total equity
Total equity and liabilities
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards
Date of approval of the fi nancial statements: 27 March 2014
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these
consolidated fi nancial statements.
Ran Shtarkman
Director, President and Chief
Executive Offi cer
Shimon Yitzchaki
Director and Chairman
of the Audit Committee
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
71
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
Consolidated
statement of
profi t or loss
Continuing operations
Rental income
Revenues from entertainment centers
Total revenues
Cost of operations
Cost of operations – entertainment centers
Gross profi t
Loss from disposal of undeveloped Trading Property
Write-down of Trading Properties
Write-down of equity-accounted investees
Loss from disposal of equity accounted investees
(holding undeveloped Trading Properties)
Share in results of equity-accounted investees
Administrative expenses, excluding restructuring costs
Restructuring costs
Other income
Other expenses
Results from operating activities
Finance income
Finance costs
Net fi nance costs
Loss before income tax
Tax benefi t
Loss from continuing operations
Discontinued operation
Profi t (loss) from discontinued operation, net of tax
Loss for the year
Loss attributable to:
Owners of the Company
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO)
Earnings per share – continuing operations
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO)
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
23,678
3,345
27,023
(9,408)
(4,025)
13,590
(346)
(117,913)
(56,417)
(3,724)
952
(9,435)
(702)
413
(11,468)
(185,050)
1,288
(40,632)
(39,344)
(224,394)
6,256
(218,138)
65
(218,073)
23,112
6,911
30,023
(9,384)
(8,267)
12,372
(65)
(60,293)
(23,443)
-
1,475
(11,432)
-
8,970
(1,122)
(73,538)
20,358
(37,531)
(17,173)
(90,711)
6,592
(84,119)
(2,044)
(86,163)
(218,073)
(86,163)
(0.73)
(0.73)
(0.29)
(0.28)
Note
26(a)
26(b)
27(a)
27(b)
34(e)
11
14
34(d),(f)
14
28a
28b
29
29
30
30
31
37
24
24
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards and to notes 27, 28 and 29 on other reclassifi cations.
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements.
72
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Consolidated
statement of
comprehensive
income
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
(218,073)
(86,163)
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Items that are or may be reclassifi ed to profi t or loss:
Net change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets transferred to income statement
Change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets
Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Discontinued operation) – reclassifi ed to profi t or loss
Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Discontinued operation) – 2012 movements
(723)
(14)
-
-
Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Equity accounted investees) – reclassifi ed to profi t or loss
4,360
Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Equity accounted investees)
Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Trading properties)
Tax on other comprehensive income due to change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year, net of income tax
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:
Owners of the Company:
Non-controlling interests
(15,036)
(3,726)
184
(14,955)
(233,028)
(232,918)
(110)
1,222
1,297
(9,730)
2,818
-
(7,064)
(1,746)
(630)
(13,833)
(99,996)
(99,961)
(35)
Total comprehensive loss for the year
(233,028)
(99,996)
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
73
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
Consolidated
statement of
changes in equity
Attributable to the equity holders of the Company
Capital
reserve from
acquisition of
non-controlling Financial
interests
assets
without
available
Retained
Non-
Share
based
Share
Share
payment Translation
a change
for sale
earnings
controlling
capital
premium
reserves
reserve
in control
reserve
(losses)
Total
interests*
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
€’000
Total
€’000
Balance at January 1, 2012,
as previously reported
2,972
261,773
33,290
(10,672)
(19,342)
(1,336)
275,437
542,122
8,040
550,162
Impact of changes in
accounting policies
Restated balance at
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(7,289)
(7,289)
January 1, 2012
2,972
261,773
33,290
(10,672)
(19,342)
(1,336)
275,437
542,122
751
542,873
Change in non-controlling interest -
-
-
-
(1,364)
Share based payment
(refer to note 25)
-
-
1,419
Comprehensive income for the year
Net loss for the year
Foreign currency translation
differences
Available for sale reserve,
net of tax
Total comprehensive income
(loss) for the year
-
-
-
-
Balance at
-
-
-
-
Share based payment
(refer to note 25)
-
-
424
Comprehensive income for the year
Net loss for the year
Foreign currency
translation differences
Available for sale reserve,
net of tax
Total comprehensive
loss for the year
Balance at
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(15,687)
-
-
(15,687)
-
-
-
(14,292)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(14,292)
-
-
-
-
-
(1,364)
-
1,419
(86,163)
(86,163)
-
-
-
(1,364)
1,419
(86,163)
-
(15,687)
(35)
(15,722)
1,889
-
1,889
-
1,889
1,889
(86,163)
(99,961)
(35)
(99,996)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
424
(218,073)
(218,073)
-
-
424
(218,073)
-
(14,292)
(110)
(14,402)
(553)
-
(553)
-
(553)
(553)
(218,073)
(232,918)
(110)
(233,028)
December 31, 2012
2,972
261,773
34,709
(26,359)
(20,706)
553
189,274
442,216
716
442,932
December 31, 2013
2,972
261,773
35,133
(40,651)
(20,706)
-
(28,799)
209,722
606
210,328
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements.
74
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Consolidated
statement of
cash fl ows
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Note
€’000
Restated* €’000
(218,073)
(86,163)
12
13
30
14
31
11
12
34(e)
34(h)
8
8
423
4,267
39,344
424
(65)
(23)
78,617
(6,256)
1,065
(837)
17,173
197
2,044
(13)
19,854
(6,592)
(101,342)
(53,272)
(122)
10,126
108,831
(4,028)
3,498
118,305
353
(10,926)
(295)
6,095
(75)
169
-
7,649
32,410
-
(1,424)
12,012
-
50,741
(581)
5,821
27,632
(18,122)
(8,577)
6,173
3,822
(24,214)
(297)
(67,788)
(462)
250
63,885
-
-
50,643
(16,089)
31,294
3,102
132,623
Cash fl ows from operating activities
Loss for the year
Adjustments necessary to refl ect cash fl ows used in operating activities:
Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment
Change in fair value of investment property
Net fi nance costs
Equity-settled share-based payment transaction
Discontinued operations
Gain on sale of property and equipment
Share of loss of equity-accounted investees, net of tax
Tax benefi t
Subtotal
Changes in:
Trade receivables
Other accounts receivable
Trading properties
Trade payables
Other liabilities, related parties liabilities and provisions
Subtotal
Interest received
Interest paid
Taxes paid
Net cash from (used in) operating activities
Cash from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
Discontinued operations
Proceeds from sale of investment property
Proceeds from liquidation of equity accounted investee EPUS
Long-term deposits redemption
Purchase of marketable debt securities fi nancial assets
Proceeds from sale of available for sale fi nancial assets
Short-term deposits, net
Net cash from investing activities
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards and to notes 27, 28 and 29 on other reclassifi cations.
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
75
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
Cash from fi nancing activities
Proceeds from bank loans and fi nancial institutions
Proceeds from utilization and settlement of derivatives
Proceeds (payments) from hedging activities through sell of options
Repurchase of debentures
Changes in restricted cash
Proceeds from re-issuance of long-term debentures
Repayment of debentures
Repayment of interest bearing loans from banks
Net cash used in fi nancing activities
Effect of movement in exchange rate fl uctuations on cash held
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the year
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 of January
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 of December
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Note
€’000
Restated* €’000
15
20, 21
20, 21
16
659
-
(2,364)
-
9,316
13,772
(60,319)
(27,490)
(66,426)
373
(9,217)
35,374
26,157
46,720
238
11,683
(18,814)
(1,796)
-
(65,320)
(53,554)
(80,843)
(56)
(16,064)
51,438
35,374
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements.
76
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Notes to the
consolidated
fi nancial
statements
NOTE 1 - PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND OWNERSHIP
Plaza Centers N.V. (“the Group” or “the Company”) was incorporated and is registered in the Netherlands. The Company’s registered offi ce is at Prins Hendrikkade
48-S, 1012 AC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The Company conducts its activities in the fi eld of establishing, operating and selling of shopping and entertainment
centers, as well as other mixed-use projects (retail, offi ce, residential) in Central and Eastern Europe (starting 1996), India (from 2006), and, between 2010 and
2012, also in the USA. The consolidated fi nancial statements for each of the periods presented comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as
the “Group”) and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly controlled entities.
The Company is dual listed on the Main Board of the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”) and, starting October 2007, on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (“WSE”).
The Company’s immediate parent company is Elbit Ultrasound (Luxembourg) B.V. / S.à r.l. (“EUL”), which holds 62.5% of the Company’s shares, as at the end of
the reporting period (December 31, 2012 – 62.5%). The ultimate parent company is Elbit Imaging Limited (“EI”). For the list of the Group entities, refer to note 39.
NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PREPARATION
a. Statement of compliance
The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as adopted by the European
Union (“EU”).
These consolidated fi nancial statements are not intended for statutory fi ling purposes. The Company is required to fi le consolidated fi nancial statements prepared
in accordance with The Netherlands Civil Code. At the date of approving these fi nancial statements the Company had not yet prepared consolidated fi nancial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 in accordance with the Netherlands Civil Code.
The consolidated fi nancial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2014.
b. Basis of measurement
The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the following material items in the statement of the fi nancial
position:
Investment properties were measured at fair value
•
• Liabilities for cash-settled share-based payment arrangements are measured at fair value
• Available for sale fi nancial assets are measured at fair value
• Derivative fi nancial instruments are measured at fair value
• Non-Derivative fi nancial instruments at fair value through profi t or loss are measured at fair value.
c. Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated fi nancial statements are presented in EURO (“EUR”), which is the Company’s functional currency. All fi nancial information presented in EUR
has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated.
d. Going concern
On November 14, 2013 the Company announced that it would be freezing payments to all its lenders and would be entering into negotiations with these creditors
to arrive at an agreed debt arrangement (restructuring plan). The Company’s proposed debt arrangement, updated March 26, 2013, includes an equity injection
from the owners in the amount of circa 20 million EUR via a rights issuance (“Equity Contribution”), a delay of all the bond series’ principal payment by three
years, a realization plan under which 19 of the 29 assets are estimated to be realized by 2018 for circa 490 million EUR (net proceeds, being mainly net of asset
specifi c borrowings and taxes), a transfer of 75% of the net proceeds of realizations to the bondholders as early repayment, compensate the bondholders with an
additional 1.5% annual interest, and additional compensation to the bondholders by share issuance (without additional proceeds), in a total of 13.5% (post the
Equity Contribution) of the Company’s outstanding shares.
Management believes that the implementation of the restructuring plan will provide the Company with the ability to resolve its immediate liquidity situation in
order to continue operating as going concern and preserve value for its shareholders and creditors.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
77
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Management acknowledges that material uncertainty remains over the Group’s ability to meet its funding requirements and to refi nance or repay its debts as
they fall due. If for any reason the Group is unable to reach an approved restructuring plan, and more specifi cally, if the Group will not be able to raise EUR 20
million equity from shareholders which is a pre-condition to the debt restructuring plan approval (refer to note 34(A) section ‘To shareholders’) then this would
likely have an adverse impact on the Group’s ability to realise assets at their recognised values, and to extinguish liabilities in the normal course of business at the
amounts stated in the consolidated fi nancial statements and ultimately result in the Group being unable to continue as a going concern. The consolidated fi nancial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Group will be able to successfully complete its proposed debt arrangement as
further discussed in note 34(A).
e. Investment property vs. trading property classifi cation
The Company has designated its properties into three types (completed trading property projects, plots scheduled for construction and plots under planning
stage).
In respect of its completed trading property projects, and as written above, the Company still faces material uncertainties in respect of the time needed to sell the
properties. However the Group has not changed its business model and is actively seeking buyers. Therefore it is clear from the Company’s perspective that these
completed properties are trading properties, rather than investment properties.
In respect of plots under planning stage held, which are not intended to be constructed in the near future, the Company is actively looking for buyers and does not
hold the plots passively with the intention to gain from a potential value increase. Plots scheduled for construction are intended to be developed and sold in the
normal course of business once circumstances allow. Therefore the Company also believes that these are appropriately classifi ed as trading properties.
f. Use of estimates and judgments
The preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in conformity with IFRS as adopted by the EU requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses.
The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is
revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
Information about other critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most signifi cant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated
fi nancial statements is included in the following note:
• Note 11 – Suspension of borrowing costs capitalization
• Note 11 – Classifi cation of trading properties as current vs. non-current
• Note 11 – Trading property vs. Investment property
Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a signifi cant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next fi nancial year are
included in the following notes:
• Notes 11 – Key assumptions used in determining the net realisable value of trading properties
• Note 11, 33 – Provisions and contingencies
• Note 25 – Measurement of share-based payments
Functional currency
The EUR is the functional currency for Group companies (with the exception of Indian companies – in which the functional currency is the Indian Rupee – INR,
and the investment in the USA held until June 30, 2012 - in which the functional currency was the USD) since it is the currency of the economic environment
in which the Group operates. This is because the EUR (and in India and the USA – the INR and USD, respectively) is the main currency in which management,
determines its pricing with tenants, potential buyers and suppliers, determine its fi nancing activities and budgets and assesses its currency exposures.
78
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 2 / note 3
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Operating cycle determination
The Normal Operating Cycle (“NOC”) of the Group is driven by its business model to buy, develop and sell, primarily shopping centers, and comprises the
estimated amount of time required to complete the process from the acquisition of undeveloped land through its development, preparation for sale and ultimate
disposal. Based on the Group’s experience, mainly from the period from 1996-2008, this period of time was three to fi ve years (and in respect of large scale,
multi-phase/mixed-use projects, up to eight years). For example, for completed shopping centers, these steps include achieving a stabilized tenants list, improving
the tenant mix, increasing occupancy rates, completion of certain tenant improvements and fi nding the qualifi ed buyers. For plots, this includes obtaining permits,
fi nance and construction.
The Company maintains its existing business model; however with the fi nancial crisis as background the level of uncertainty of the actual amount of time needed
to complete all steps in the process has become much higher than what the Company believes is a normal level.
Over the period 2009 – 2012, the Company has had diffi culty selling completed properties at prices refl ecting management’s view of reasonable estimated values,
as well as experienced a lack of available fi nance for development of plots. The return to what management considers more normal conditions, primarily in the
CEE markets where it has properties, has been longer than expected.
In view of these uncertainties and abnormalities, the Company has taken a position of reclassifying its entire trading properties asset to long-term, with the
exception of a property where a sale and purchase agreement exists as described in note 11, until the abnormal level of uncertainty is reduced.
NOTE 3 - CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Except for the changes below, the Group has consistently applied the accounting policies set out in note 4 to all periods presented in these consolidated fi nancial
statements.
The Group has adopted the following new standards and amendments to standards, including any consequential amendments to other standards, with a date of
initial application of 1 January 2013:
a. IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (2011) – early adoption
b. IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements – early adoption
c. IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities – early adoption
d. IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
e. Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (Amendments to IAS 1)
(a) Subsidiaries
As a result of IFRS 10 (2011), the Group has changed its accounting policy for determining whether it has control over and consequently whether it consolidates
its investees. IFRS 10 (2011) introduces a new control model that focuses on whether the Group has power over an investee, exposure or rights to variable
returns from its involvement with the investee and ability to use its power to affect those returns.
In accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 10 (2011), the Group reassessed the control conclusion for its investees at 1 January 2013, and concluded
that there has been no impact on the recognised assets, liabilities and comprehensive income of the Group.
(b) Joint arrangements
Joint arrangements provides for a more realistic refl ection of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its
legal form. There are two types of joint arrangement: joint operations and joint ventures. Joint operations arise where a joint operator has right to the assets and
obligations relating to the arrangement and hence accounts for its interest in assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Joint ventures arise where the joint operator
has rights to the net assets of the arrangement and hence equity accounts for its interest. Proportional consolidation of joint ventures is no longer allowed.
As a result of IFRS 11, the Group has changed its accounting policy for its interests in joint arrangements. Under IFRS 11, the Group has classifi ed its interests in
joint arrangements as either joint operations (if the Group has rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to an arrangement) or joint ventures
(if the Group has rights only to the net assets of an arrangement).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
79
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
When making this assessment, the Group considered the structure of the arrangements, the legal form of any separate vehicles, the contractual terms of the
arrangements and other facts and circumstances. Previously, the structure of the arrangement was the sole focus of classifi cation. The Group has re-evaluated
its involvement in its various joint arrangements and, deeming them to be joint ventures rather than joint operations because in all cases the parties that have
joint control of the arrangement (i.e. joint ventures) have rights to the net assets of the arrangement rather than to the assets and liabilities of the arrangement,
therefore, the Group has changed the accounting treatment for all its jointly controlled entities (previously accounted according to proportional consolidation
method) to be accounted for as joint ventures applying the equity method, thus impacting the recognised assets, liabilities and comprehensive income of the
Group.
The quantitative impact of the change is set out in (g) below.
(c) Disclosure of interests in other entities
As a result of IFRS 12, the Group has expanded its disclosures about its equity-accounted investees (refer to note 14). The Group does not have interests in
unconsolidated structured entities.
(d) Fair value measurement
IFRS 13 establishes a single framework for measuring fair value and making disclosures about fair value measurements when such measurements are required
or permitted by other IFRSs. It unifi es the defi nition of fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
It replaces and expands the disclosure requirements about fair value measurements in other IFRSs, including IFRS 7. As a result, the Group has included
additional disclosures in this regard (refer to notes 11, 14). In addition, due to the signifi cant impact of the valuation of Trading properties on their carrying
amounts the Group has included additional disclosures similar to those required by this standard in note 11.
(e) Presentation of items of OCI
As a result of the amendments to IAS 1, the Group has modifi ed the presentation of items of OCI in its statement of profi t or loss and OCI, to present separately
items that would be reclassifi ed to profi t or loss from those that would never be. Comparative information has been re-presented accordingly.
(f) Materiality considerations
Material joint ventures are considered equity accounted investees existing as of December 31, 2013 which their total assets approximates 5 percent of the total
consolidated assets as of December 31, 2013 and/or December 31, 2012, or its revenues exceeded 15 per cent of the total consolidated revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2013.
(g) Summary of quantitative impact
The below tables includes a summary of the adjustments made to the Group’s statements of fi nancial position at December 31, 2012, its statements of profi t or
loss and cash fl ows for the year period ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the implementation of the equity method instead of proportionate consolidation,
as required by IFRS 11.
80
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 3
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
(1) Effect on the statement of fi nancial position
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank deposits
Available for sale fi nancial assets
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments and advances
Trading properties
Total current assets
Equity accounted investees
Loans to equity accounted investee
Property and equipment
Investment property
Restricted bank deposits
Other non-current assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Trade payables
Related parties
Provisions
Derivatives
Other liabilities
Total current liabilities
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Other liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Non-controlling interests
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
December 31, 2012
As presented
in the past
€’000
December 31, 2012
Effect of retrospective
application of IFRS 11
€’000
December 31, 2012
As presented in these
fi nancial statements
€’000
64,440
25,518
11,714
4,687
38,928
7,821
780,963
934,071
-
-
8,109
14,489
978
358
23,934
958,005
264,296
34,966
34,184
8,748
511
15,597
3,320
14,094
375,716
5,773
81,181
39,010
232
6,947
133,143
508,859
6,930
442,216
449,146
958,005
(29,066)
(6,759)
-
(1,288)
(27,436)
-
(168,488)
(233,037)
154,830
6,949
(728)
-
(199)
(2)
160,850
(72,187)
(58,319)
-
-
(1,179)
35
-
-
(6,446)
(65,909)
-
-
-
(47)
(17)
(64)
(65,973)
(6,214)
-
(6,214)
(72,187)
35,374
18,759
11,714
3,399
11,492
7,821
612,475
701,034
154,830
6,949
7,381
14,489
779
356
184,784
885,818
205,977
34,966
34,184
7,569
546
15,597
3,320
7,648
309,807
5,773
81,181
39,010
185
6,930
133,079
442,886
716
442,216
442,932
885,818
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
81
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
January 1, 2012
As presented
in the past
€’000
January 1, 2012
Effect of retrospective
application of IFRS 11
€’000
January 1, 2012
As presented in these
fi nancial statements
€’000
58,261
21,428
3,102
25,568
5,432
12,941
33,089
850,229
1,010,050
-
-
-
51,646
9,026
272,348
5,456
338,476
(6,823)
(3,988)
-
-
(2,640)
(4,220)
(25,046)
(201,555)
(244,272)
95,475
141,174
15,160
(1,069)
(796)
(258,696)
(235)
(8,957)
51,438
17,440
3,102
25,568
2,792
8,721
8,043
648,674
765,778
95,475
141,174
15,160
50,577
8,230
13,652
5,221
329,489
1,348,526
(253,259)
1,095,267
296,235
32,930
22,831
27,329
2,228
15,597
27,464
424,614
152,387
110,320
86,052
3,561
5,757
15,673
373,750
798,364
8,040
542,122
550,162
(87,377)
-
-
(1,617)
-
-
(12,203)
(101,197)
(136,691)
-
-
(5,598)
(2,484)
(144,773)
(245,970)
(7,289)
-
(7,289)
208,858
32,930
22,831
25,712
2,228
15,597
15,261
323,417
15,696
110,320
86,052
3,561
159
13,189
228,977
552,394
751
542,122
542,873
1,348,526
(253,259)
1,095,267
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank deposits
Short-term deposits
Available for sale fi nancial assets
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments and advances
Trading properties
Total current assets
Equity accounted investee - discontinued operation
Equity accounted investees
Loans to equity accounted investee
Long-term deposits and other investments
Property and equipment
Investment property
Other non-current assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Trade payables
Related parties
Provisions
Other liabilities
Total current liabilities
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Debentures at amortized cost
Derivatives
Other liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Non-controlling interests
Equity attributable to owners of the Company
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
82
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 3
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
(2) Effect on the income statement
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented
in the past
€’000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
Effect of retrospective
application of IFRS 11
€’0000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
Other reclassifi cations
(Refer to notes 27, 28, 29)
€’000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented in these
fi nancial statements
€’000
Continuing operations
Rental income
Revenue from entertainment centers
Total revenues
Write-down of Trading Properties
Cost of operations
Cost of operations-entertainment centers
Gross profi t (loss)
Write-down of Trading Properties
Loss from disposal of undeveloped Trading Property
Write-down of equity-accounted investees
Share in results of equity-accounted investees
Administrative expenses
Other income
Other expenses
Results from operating activities
Finance income
Finance costs
Net fi nance costs
41,593
-
41,593
(78,833)
(20,385)
-
(57,625)
-
-
-
-
(16,848)
2,763
(1,122)
(72,832)
20,515
(37,055)
(16,540)
Share in results of equity-accounted investees
(68)
Loss before income tax
Tax benefi t
Loss from continuing operations
Discontinued operation
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax
Loss for the period
Loss attributable to:
Owners of the Company (1)
Non-controlling interests
Earnings per share
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO)
Earnings per share – continuing operations
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO)
(89,440)
5,463
(83,977)
(1,950)
(85,927)
(86,163)
236
(0.29)
(0.28)
(11,570)
-
(11,570)
26,151
6,205
-
20,786
-
-
(23,443)
-
1,945
(1,469)
-
(2,181)
(157)
(476)
(633)
1,543
(1,271)
1,129
(142)
(94)
(236)
-
(236)
-
-
(6,911)
6,911
-
52,682
4,796
(8,267)
49,211
(60,293)
(65)
-
1,475
3,471
7,676
-
1,475
-
-
-
(1,475)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23,112
6,911
30,023
-
(9,384)
(8,267)
12,372
(60,293)
(65)
(23,443)
1,475
(11,432)
8,970
(1,122)
(73,538)
20,358
(37,531)
(17,173)
-
(90,711)
6,592
(84,119)
(2,044)
(86,163)
(86,163)
-
(0.29)
(0.28)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
83
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
(3) Effect on the statement of cash fl ows
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash from investing activities
Net cash used in fi nancing activities
Effect of exchange rate fl uctuations on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the period
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented
in the past
€’000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
Effect of retrospective
application of IFRS 11
€’000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented in these
fi nancial statements
€’000
(54,581)
194,476
(133,758)
42
6,179
58,261
64,440
(13,207)
(61,853)
52,915
(98)
(22,243)
(6,823)
(29,066)
(67,788)
132,623
(80,843)
(56)
(16,064)
51,438
35,374
NOTE 4 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Except for the changes explained in note 3, the Group has consistently applied the following accounting policies to all periods presented in these consolidated
fi nancial statements.
Certain comparative amounts in the consolidated statement of fi nancial position, consolidated statement of profi t or loss, consolidated statement of
comprehensive income and consolidated statement of cash fl ow have been reclassifi ed to conform to the current year’s presentation, mainly due to
implementation of IFRS 11 (refer to notes 14, 27, 28).
a. Basis of consolidation
1. Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with
the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The fi nancial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
fi nancial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the fi nancial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the Group in
the consolidated fi nancial statements.
2. Interests in equity-accounted investees
The Group’s interests in equity-accounted investees comprise interests in associates and a joint venture. Associates are those entities in which the Group has
signifi cant infl uence, but not control or joint control, over the fi nancial and operating policies. A joint venture is an arrangement in which the Group has joint
control, whereby the Group has rights to the net assets of the arrangement, rather than rights to its assets and obligations for its liabilities.
Interests in associates and the joint venture are accounted for using the equity method. They are recognised initially at cost, which includes transaction costs.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the consolidated fi nancial statements include the Group’s share of the profi t or loss and other comprehensive income of equity-
accounted investees, until the date on which signifi cant infl uence or joint control ceases.
3. Non-controlling interests
Non-controlling interests are measured at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifi able net assets at the acquisition date. Changes in the Group’s interest
in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.
4. Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised gains arising
from transactions with equity-accounted investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are
eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
84
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 3 / note 4
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
b. Foreign currency
1. Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group companies at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-
monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair
value was determined. Foreign currency differences are generally recognised in profi t or loss. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a
foreign currency are not translated.
However, foreign currency differences arising from the translation of available-for-sale equity investments (except on impairment in which case foreign currency
differences that have been recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassifi ed to profi t or loss) are recognised in other comprehensive income.
2. Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated into euro at the exchange rates
at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into euro at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
Foreign currency differences are recognised in other comprehensive income, and accumulated in the translation reserve, except to the extent that the translation
difference is allocated to non-controlling interest.
When a foreign operation is disposed of in its entirety or partially such that control, signifi cant infl uence or joint control is lost, the cumulative amount in the
translation reserve related to that foreign operation is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal. If the Group disposes of part of its
interest in a subsidiary but retains control, then the relevant proportion of the cumulative amount is reattributed to non-controlling interest.
When the Group disposes of only part of an associate or joint venture while retaining signifi cant infl uence or joint control, the relevant proportion of the
cumulative amount is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss.
If the settlement of a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future, then foreign
currency differences arising from such item form part of the net investment in the foreign operation. Accordingly, such differences are recognised in other
comprehensive income and accumulated in the translation reserve.
c. Financial instruments
(1) Non-derivative fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities – recognition and de-recognition
The Group initially recognises loans and receivables and debt securities issued on the date when they are originated. All other fi nancial assets and fi nancial
liabilities are initially recognised on the trade date.
The Group derecognises a fi nancial asset when the contractual rights to the cash fl ows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual
cash fl ows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the fi nancial asset are transferred, or it neither transfers nor retains
substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognised fi nancial assets
that is created or retained by the Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.
The Group derecognises a fi nancial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled, or expire.
Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of fi nancial position when, and only when, the Group has a legal
right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Refer to note 32 for the list
of Non-derivative fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities.
(2) Non-derivative fi nancial assets – measurement
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted bank deposits
In the consolidated statement of cash fl ows, cash and cash equivalents includes bank deposits deposited for periods which do not exceed three months.
Restricted bank deposits are deposit restricted due to bank facilities.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
85
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Loans and receivables
These assets are initially recognised at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortised
cost using the effective interest method. The collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectable are written
off in the period in which they are identifi ed. Doubtful receivables are impaired when there is objective evidence that the Group will not collect all amounts due.
These types of assets are discussed in note 9, 10a and 10b.
Held for trading fi nancial assets
These assets are initially recognised at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value
and changes therein, are recognised in statement of profi t or loss.
Available-for-sale fi nancial assets
These assets are initially recognised at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment
losses and foreign currency differences on debt instruments (refer to 3(h) below), are recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity.
When these assets are derecognised, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss.
(3) Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities
Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss include selected unsecured non-convertible Debentures series A and series B (refer to note 20).
Upon initial recognition a fi nancial liability may be designated by the Company at fair value through profi t or loss. Financial instruments are designated at fair value
through profi t or loss if the Group manages such instruments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Group’s
documented risk management or investment strategy, or to eliminate or signifi cantly reduce a measurement or recognition inconsistency. Upon initial recognition
attributable transaction costs are recognised in profi t or loss when incurred. Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss are measured at fair value, and
changes therein are recognised in profi t or loss.
Other non-derivative fi nancial liabilities
Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these
liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The Group has the following non-derivative fi nancial liabilities: interest bearing loans,
debentures not designated as fair value through profi t or loss (refer to note 21), trade payables, related parties and other liabilities.
(4) Derivative fi nancial instruments
The Group holds (or held) derivative fi nancial instruments to hedge its foreign currency and interest rate risk exposures. Embedded derivatives are separated from
the host contract and accounted for separately if certain criteria are met. Derivatives are recognised initially at fair value; any directly attributable transaction costs
are recognised in profi t or loss as they are incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are generally
recognised in profi t or loss.
d. Share capital
Ordinary shares are classifi ed as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from
equity, net of any tax effect. Costs attributable to listing existing shares are expensed as incurred.
e. Trading properties
Properties that are being constructed or developed for sale in the ordinary course of business and empty plots acquired to be developed for such a sale are
classifi ed as trading properties (inventory) and measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs to complete construction and selling expenses. If net
realisable value is less than the cost, the trading property is written down to net realisable value.
In each subsequent period, a new assessment is made of net realisable value. When the circumstances that previously caused trading properties to be written
down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase in net realisable value because of changed economic circumstances, the amount of
the write-down is reversed so that the new carrying amount is the lower of the cost and the revised net realisable value.
86
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 4
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
The amount of any write-down of trading properties to net realisable value and all losses of trading properties are recognised as a Write-down of trading
properties expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any reversal of such write downs arising from an increase in net realisable value is
recognised as a reduction in the expense in the period in which the reversal occurs.
Lands which are designated for development of trading properties projects are not written down below costs if the completed projects are expected to be sold at
or above cost.
Costs comprise all costs of purchase, direct materials, direct labour costs, subcontracting costs and other direct overhead costs incurred in bringing the
properties to their present condition.
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset are capitalized as part of the costs of the asset. A qualifying asset is an
asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period
in which they incurred.
Capitalization of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and expenditure and borrowing costs are being incurred.
Capitalization of borrowing costs may continue until the asset is substantially ready for its intended use (i.e. upon issuance of certifi cate of occupancy).
In certain cases, where the construction phase is suspended for an unplanned period expected to exceed 25% of the total scheduled time for construction,
cessation of the capitalisation of borrowing cost will apply, until construction phase is resumed.
Non–specifi c borrowing costs are capitalised to such qualifying asset, by applying a capitalization rate to the expenditures on such asset. The capitalization rate
is the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the borrowings of the Group that are outstanding during the period, other than borrowing made
specifi cally for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset.
The amount of borrowing costs capitalized during the period does not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during that period.
f. Investment property
Investment property is initially measured at cost and subsequently at fair value with any change therein recognised in profi t or loss. Any gain or loss on disposal
of investment property (calculated as the difference between the net proceeds from disposal and the carrying amount of the item) is recognised in profi t or loss.
g. Property and equipment
Items of property and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses (refer to accounting policy 3(h)).If
signifi cant parts of an item of property and equipment have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property,
plant and equipment.
Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property and equipment is recognised in profi t or loss. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of
property and equipment less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognised in profi t or
loss. Land is not depreciated.
The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Land – owned
Offi ce buildings
Equipment, fi xture and fi ttings
Aircrafts
Other*
Years
0
25-50
10-15
20
3-18
* Consists mainly of motor vehicles, equipment, computers, peripheral equipment, etc.
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
87
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
h. Impairment
(1) Non-derivative fi nancial assets
Financial assets not classifi ed as at fair value through profi t or loss are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence of
impairment.
Objective evidence that fi nancial assets are impaired includes:
restructuring of an amount due to the Group on terms that the Group would not consider otherwise;
indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy;
• default or delinquency by a debtor;
•
•
• adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers or issuers;
•
• observable data indicating that there is measurable decrease in expected cash fl ows from a group of fi nancial assets
the disappearance of an active market for a security; or
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
The Group considers evidence of impairment for these assets at both an individual asset and a collective level. All individually signifi cant assets are individually
assessed for impairment. Those found not to be impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet individually
identifi ed. Assets that are not individually signifi cant are collectively assessed for impairment. Collective assessment is carried out by grouping together assets
with similar risk characteristics.
In assessing collective impairment, the Group uses historical information on the timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, and makes an adjustment if
current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be greater or lesser than suggested by historical trends.
An impairment loss is calculated as the difference between an asset’s carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash fl ows discounted at the
asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognised in profi t or loss and refl ected in an allowance account. When the Group considers that there are no
realistic prospects of recovery of the asset, the relevant amounts are written off.
If the amount of impairment loss subsequently decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised,
then the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed through profi t or loss.
Available-for-sale fi nancial assets
Impairment losses on available-for-sale fi nancial assets are recognised by reclassifying the losses accumulated in the fair value reserve to profi t or loss. The
amount reclassifi ed is the difference between the acquisition cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and the current fair value, less any impairment
loss previously recognised in profi t or loss. If the fair value of an impaired available-for-sale debt security subsequently increases and the increase can be related
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised, then the impairment loss is reversed through profi t or loss. Subsequent recovery in
the fair value of available for sale equity instruments are reversed through other comprehensive income.
(2) Non-fi nancial assets and interests in equity accounted investees
At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its non-fi nancial assets (property and equipment) and interests in equity accounted investees to
determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.
For impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash infl ows from continuing use that are largely independent
of the cash infl ows of other assets or cash generating units (“CGU”).
The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. Value in use is based on the estimated future cash
fl ows, discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to
the asset or CGU. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount.
Impairment losses are recognised in profi t or loss. They are allocated fi rst to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU, and then to reduce
the carrying amounts of the other assets in the CGU on a pro rata basis.
88
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 4
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is never reversed. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount
does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
i. Provisions
Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and
the risks specifi c to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as fi nance cost.
Construction costs
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outfl ow of
resources embodying economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is
virtually certain.
The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected
future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to the liability. The unwinding of the
discount is recognised as fi nance cost.
Warranties
A provision for warranties is recognised when the underlying products or services are sold, based on historical warranty data and a weighting of possible
outcomes against their associated probabilities.
Restructuring plan
A provision for restructuring is recognised when a formal restructuring plan was approved by all relevant bodies, and the restructuring either has commenced or
has been announced publicly. Future operating losses are not provided for.
j. Revenue
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances, rebates and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
The Group recognises revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefi ts will fl ow to the entity and
specifi c criteria have been met for each of the Group’s activities as described below. The Group bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration
the type of customer, the type of transaction and specifi cs of each arrangement.
Rental income
The Group leases real estate to its customers under leases that are classifi ed as operating leases. Rental income from investment property and trading property
is recognized in profi t or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease origination fees and internal direct lease origination costs are deferred and
amortized over the related lease term. Lease incentives granted are recognized as an integral part of the total rental income, over the term of the lease.
The leases generally provide for rent escalations throughout the lease term. For these leases, the revenue is recognized on a straight line basis so as to produce a
constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. The leases may also provide for contingent rent based on a percentage of the lessee’s gross sales or contingent
rent indexed to further increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).
Where rentals that are contingent upon reaching a certain percentage of the lessee’s gross sales, the Group recognizes rental revenue when the factor on which
the contingent lease payment is based actually occurs. Rental revenues for lease escalations indexed to future increases in the CPI are recognized only after the
changes in the index have occurred.
Revenues from selling of trading properties and investment properties
Revenues from selling of trading properties and investment properties are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenues are
recognized when all the following conditions are met:
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
89
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
a. the Group has transferred to the buyer the signifi cant risks and rewards of ownership;
b. the Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the property sold;
c. the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
d. it is probable that the economic benefi ts associated with the transaction will fl ow to the Group (including the fact that the buyer’s initial and continuing
investment is adequate to demonstrate commitment to pay);
the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably; and
there are no remaining signifi cant performance obligations.
e
f.
Determining whether these criteria have been met for each sale transaction, requires certain degree of judgment by the Group management. The judgment is
made in determination whether, at the end of the reporting period, the Group has transferred to the buyer the signifi cant risks and rewards associated with the real
estate assets sold.
Such determination is based on an analysis of the terms included in the sale agreement executed with the buyer as well as an analysis of other commercial
understandings with the buyer in respect of the real estate sold. In certain cases, the sale agreement with the buyer is signed during the construction period and
the consummation of the transaction is subject to certain conditions precedents which have to be fulfi lled prior to delivery. Revenues are, therefore, recognized
when all the signifi cant conditions precedent included in the agreement have been fulfi lled by the Group and/or waived by the buyer prior to the end of the
reporting period.
Generally, the Group is provided with a bank guarantee from the buyer for the total estimated proceeds in order to secure the payment by the buyer at delivery.
Therefore, the Group is not exposed to any signifi cant risks in respect of payment of the proceeds by the buyer.
k. Operating lease payments
Payments made under operating leases (in respect of plots of land under usufruct) are recognized in profi t or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the
lease but are capitalized in relation to land used for the development of trading properties during the construction period (similar to borrowing costs).
l. Finance income and cost
For the composition of fi nance income and cost refer to note 30. For capitalisation of borrowing costs please refer to note 11.
Interest income and expense which are not capitalized are recognized in the income statement as they accrue, using the effective interest method. For the Group’s
policy regarding capitalization of borrowing costs refer to note 3(e).
m. Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognised in profi t or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items
recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax
Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to tax payable or receivable in respect
of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any tax arising from dividends.
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for fi nancial reporting purposes and the
amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for:
•
•
•
temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor
taxable profi t or loss;
temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries and joint arrangements to the extent that the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of
the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and
taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill
Deferred tax assets are recognised for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future
taxable profi ts will be available against which they can be used. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that the related tax benefi t will be realised.
90
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 4
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if:
•
•
there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities; and
the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either:
1) the same taxable entity; or
2) different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities
simultaneously, in each future period in which signifi cant amounts of deferred tax liabilities or assets are expected to be settled or recovered.
n. Segment reporting
Segment results that are reported to the Group’s CEO (the chief operating decision maker) include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can
be allocated on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise mainly corporate debt, assets (primarily the Company’s headquarters), head offi ce expenses, and
tax assets and liabilities.
o. Employee benefi ts
1. Bonuses
The Group recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses, which are based on agreements with employees or according to management decisions based on
Group performance goals and on individual employee performance. The Group recognizes a liability where contractually obliged or where past practice has created
a constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
2. Share-based payment transactions
The fair value of options granted to employees to acquire shares of the Company is recognized as an employee expense or capitalized if directly associated with
development of trading property, with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the
employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to refl ect the actual number of share options that vest.
Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modifi ed, the minimum expense recognized is the expense as if the terms had not been modifi ed. An additional
expense is recognized for any modifi cation, which increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise benefi cial to the
employees as measured at the date of modifi cation. The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of share-based payments, which may be settled
in cash, at the option of the holder, is recognized as an expense, with a corresponding increase in liability, over the period in which the employees become
unconditionally entitled to payment. The fair value is re-measured at each reporting date and at settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are
recognized as an additional cost in salaries and related expenses in the income statement. As of the end of the reporting period share-based payments which may
be settled in cash are options granted to only one person and can be cash settled at the option of the holder.
p. Earnings Per Share
The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profi t or loss attributable to
ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting
the profi t or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential
ordinary shares, which comprise share options granted to employees.
q. Discontinued operation
A discontinued operation is a component of the Group’s business, the operations and cash fl ows of which can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Group,
that either has been disposed of or is classifi ed as held for sale and:
1. represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations;
2. is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; or
3. is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to re-sale.
Classifi cation as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classifi ed as held-for-sale, if earlier. When an
operation is classifi ed as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of profi t or loss and statement of comprehensive income are re-presented as if the
operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
91
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
r. New standards not yet adopted
Several new standards and amendments to standards are not yet effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, and has not been applied in preparing these
consolidated fi nancial statements.
• Amendments to IAS 32 – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to be applied
retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted, however the additional disclosures required by Amendments to IFRS 7 Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities must also be made) do not introduce new rules for offsetting fi nancial assets and liabilities; rather they clarify the offsetting criteria to
address inconsistencies in their application.
The Amendments clarify that an entity currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off if that right is:
1. not contingent on a future event; and
2. enforceable both in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the entity and all counterparties.
The Group does not expect the Amendments to have any impact on the fi nancial statements since it does not apply offsetting to any of its
fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities and it has not entered into master netting arrangements.
• Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 – Investment Entities; (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; early adoption is
permitted; to be applied retrospectively subject to transitional provisions) provide an exception to the consolidation requirements in IFRS 10 and requires
qualifying investment entities to measure their investments in controlled entities – as well as investments in associates and joint ventures – at fair value
through profi t or loss, rather than consolidating them.
The consolidation exemption is mandatory (i.e. not optional), with the only exception being that subsidiaries that are considered as an extension of the
investment entity’s investing activities, must still be consolidated.
An entity qualifi es as an investment entity if it meets all of the essential elements of the defi nition of an investment entity. According to these essential elements
an investment entity:
1. obtains funds from investors to provide those investors with investment management services;
2. commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest for returns solely from appreciation and/or investment income; and
3. Measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
The amendments also set out disclosure requirements for investment entities.
The Group does not expect the new standard to have any impact on the fi nancial statements, since the Parent Company does not qualify as an investment
entity.
• Amendments to IAS 36 – Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to be
applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted, however an entity shall not apply the amendments in periods (including comparative periods) in which
it does not also apply IFRS 13).
The Amendments clarify that recoverable amount should be disclosed only for individual assets (including goodwill) or cash-generated units for which an
impairment loss was recognised or reversed during the period.
The Amendments also require the following additional disclosures when impairment for individual assets (including goodwill) or cash-generated units has
been recognised or reversed in the period and recoverable amount is based on fair value less costs to disposal:
1. the level of IFRS 13 ‘Fair value hierarchy’ within which the fair value measurement of the asset or cash-generating unit is categorised;
2. for fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a description of the valuation techniques used and any
changes in that valuation technique together with the reason for making it;
3. for fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3, each key assumption (i.e. assumptions to which recoverable amount is most sensitive)
used in determining fair value less costs of disposal. If fair value less costs of disposal is measured using a present value technique, discount rate(s) used
both in current and previous measurement should be disclosed.
The Company does not expect the new Standard will have a material impact on the fi nancial statements.
92
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 4 / note 5
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
• Amendments to IAS 39 – Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to
be applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted:
The Amendments allows hedge accounting to continue in a situation where a derivative, which has been designated as a hedging instrument, is novated to
effect clearing with a central counterparty as a result of laws and regulations, when the following criteria are met:
1. The novation is made as a consequence of laws or regulations
2. A clearing counterparty becomes a new counterparty to each of the original counterparties of the derivative instrument
3. Changes to the terms of the derivative are limited to those necessary to replace the counterparty
The Company does not expect the new standard to have any impact on the fi nancial statements, since the entity does not currently apply hedge accounting.
NOTE 5 - MEASUREMENT OF FAIR VALUES
A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair value, for both fi nancial and non-fi nancial assets and liabilities.
When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Group uses market observable data as far as possible. The Company’s fi nance department reviews
signifi cant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments. If third party information, such as broker quotes, is used to measure fair values, then the fi nance
department assesses the evidence obtained from the third parties to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS, including the
level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuations should be classifi ed. Fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the
inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:
• Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived
from prices)
• Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)
• Note 8 – Available for sale fi nancial assets
• Note 15 – Derivatives
• Note 20 – Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
• Note 25 – Employee share option plan
• Note 32 – Financial instruments
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
93
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 6 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Bank deposits and cash denominated in
December 31, 2013
€’000
Restated* €’000
Interest rate as of
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
EUR
United States Dollar (USD)
Polish Złotys (PLN)
Indian Rupee (INR)
New Israeli Shekel (NIS)
Other currencies
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of fi nancial position
See (1) below
See (1) below
Overnight Wibor*0.7
Mainly 0%
13,894
3,250
3,393
1,541
3,375
704
26,157
20,982
5,967
3,469
1,704
2,272
980
35,374
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 Main EUR and USD deposits as of December 31, 2013 are held on corporate level and bear money market interest rates which are mainly between 0% and 0.5%.
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for fi nancial assets and liabilities are disclosed in note 32.
NOTE 7 - RESTRICTED BANK DEPOSITS
Short-term restricted bank deposits
In EUR
In USD
In NIS
In other currencies
Total short-term
Interest rate as of
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
€’000
Restated* €’000
See (1) below
See (2) below
See (2) below
5,579
-
-
740
6,319
8,337
6,946
2,426
1,050
18,759
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 As of December 31, 2013, EUR 5.6 million is restricted mainly in respect of bank facilities agreements signed to fi nance Projects in Poland, Serbia, and the Czech Republic. These
amounts carry an annual interest rate of mainly Overnight rates.
2 Restriction over 2012 USD balance was removed following the insurance refund in June 2013 (refer also to note 34(J)). Restriction over 2012 NIS balance was removed following the
repayment of NIS denominated loan
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for fi nancial assets and liabilities are disclosed in note 32.
94
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 6 / note 7 / note 8 / note 9 / note 10
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 8 - AVAILABLE FOR SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS
Available-for-sale fi nancial assets (“AFS”) portfolio consisted of mainly traded debt securities issued by banks and corporates.
Interest income from AFS
Gain (loss) from selling AFS
Total for the year
Balance as at January1
Purchase of AFS*
Sale/redemption of AFS
Discount amortization
Changes in market value of AFS
Balance as at December 31
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
€’000
For the year ended
December 31, 2012
€’000
233
723
956
11,714
155
(12,012)
157
(14)
-
712
(1,222)
(510)
25,568
16,089
(31,294)
54
1,297
11,714
* An additional EUR 1.27 million of debt securities bonds were purchased and recorded as held for trading fi nancial assets adjusted to fair value at year end.
The fair value of available-for-sale fi nancial assets was determined by reference to their quoted closing bid price at the reporting date.
NOTE 9 - TRADE RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables
Less - Allowance for doubtful debts
Total
December 31, 2013
€’000
December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
4,887
(1,515)
3,372
4,727
(1,328)
3,399
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
NOTE 10 - OTHER RECEIVABLES, PREPAYMENTS AND ADVANCES
a. Other receivables
Insurance company receivable (refer to note 34(J))
Receivable in respect of disposal of equity-accounted investee Új Udvar (refer to note 14,34(F))
VAT and tax receivables
Related parties
Others
Total
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
December 31, 2013
€’000
December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
-
2,350
1,877
-
644
4,871
7,611
-
2,218
936
727
11,492
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
95
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
b. Prepayments and advances
Prepayment in respect of plot purchase1
Prepaid expenses
Advances to suppliers
Total
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
-
617
776
1,393
5,157
1,294
1,370
7,821
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 The 2012 amount represents two components, with both amounts impaired in the course of 2013:
A) Prepayment in respect of the Kochi project in India in the amount of EUR 4.3 million.
On 11 November 2013 the Company has demanded and exercised the corporate guarantee in the amount of EUR 4.3 million including the interest thereon up till such date (the
“Reimbursement Payment”) provided by EI in the frame of the Indian JV Agreement on the ground of EI’s default to fi nalize and conclude the transfer of the Kochi Project Rights to the
Indian JV Vehicle.
EI in its reply letter has refused to repay the Reimbursement Payment. The Company is in the view that, based on the mentioned JV Agreement and its ancillary documents (including
the mentioned corporate guarantee issued by EI in favour of the Company), it has valid claim to get back the mentioned amount of EUR 4.3 million.
Despite the above, and in view of uncertainties regarding amounts and/or time, the Company decided to record the prepayment.
B) Prepayment in respect of the Târgu Mures¸ project in the amount of circa EUR 1 million. The Company decided to record this prepayment in view of uncertainty associated with the
development of the project.
NOTE 11 - TRADING PROPERTIES
Balance as at 1 January
Acquisition and construction costs
Capitalized borrowing costs1
Write-down of trading properties2
Effect of movements in exchange rates
Trading properties disposed (refer to note 34(E))
Balance as at 31 December3
Completed trading properties (operating shopping centers)
Plots scheduled for construction3, 4
Plots under planning stage
Total
December 31, 2013**
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
612,475
3,728
6,530
(117,913)
(7,831)
(1,815)
495,174
222,976
206,236
65,962
495,174
648,674
21,254
19,091
(60,293)
(2,800)
(13,451)
612,475
252,178
254,110
106,187
612,475
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
** As of December 31, 2013, the Koregaon Park trading property is the only trading property presented as short-term, owing to the existence of a sale and purchase agreement on the
trading property. All other trading properties are classifi ed as long-term.
1 Regarding accounting policy of capitalizing borrowing costs refer to note 4 (e). The Company temporarily suspended capitalization of borrowing costs starting July 1, 2013, following
temporary suspension of active development of the majority of its trading properties due to the Group’s liquidity crisis.
96
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 10 / note 11
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
2 Breakdown of write-down of trading properties:
Project name (location)
Ias¸i (Ias¸i, Romania)
Koregaon Park Plaza (Pune, India)
Belgrade Plaza / MUP (Belgrade, Serbia)
Pireas Plaza (Athens, Greece)
Liberec Plaza (Liberec, Czech Republic)
Belgrade Plaza / Visnjicka (Belgrade, Serbia)
Łódz´ Plaza (Łódz´ , Poland)
Casa Radio - Turbines (Bucharest, Romania)
Zgorzelec Plaza (Zgorzelec, Poland)
Constant¸a (Constant¸a, Romania)
Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc, Romania)
Kragujevac Plaza (Kragujevac, Serbia)
Timis¸oara Plaza (Timis¸oara, Romania)
Roztoky (Prague, Czech Republic)
Kielce Plaza (Kielce, Poland)
Sofi a (Sofi a, Bulgaria)
Other, aggregated
Total
The year ended
December 31, 2013
The year ended
December 31, 2012
€’000
1,582
15,564
29,347
12,267
11,578
6,825
6,400
6,305
2,013
4,972
4,414
751
3,968
3,500
828
-
7,599
’€’000
19,881
14,523
5,014
-
3,141
-
-
1,912
4,136
-
-
4,125
-
-
2,698
1,685
3,178
117,913
60,293
The write downs were caused mainly by the following factors:
• There were signifi cant decreases in Net Realizable Values of certain projects below the carrying amount due to worsening market condition in the certain countries in which the Group
operates including mainly Romania and Serbia.
•
In accordance with the Group’s accounting policy plots of lands held for development are not written down below costs if the completed projects are expected to be sold at or above cost.
Following management reassessment of the business plans of certain undeveloped plots of land, and the diffi culty to assess whether they will be developed or not, and to recover their
costs, the carrying amount of the plots were written down to their Net Realizable Values.
• The disposal, or contracted disposal, of certain properties at a selling price below their carrying amount triggered write down of these properties to their contractual selling price (refer to
note 34(E) and 34(G))
3 Including cost of Casa Radio project in Romania in a total amount of EUR 153 million (2012 – EUR 158 million).
4 The value of the Casa Radio project in Romania includes two non-operative gas turbines with a total carrying amount of EUR 3 million (following write down). These turbines were
purchased in the past with the purpose of supplying energy to the completed project due to lack of suffi cient energy infrastructure capabilities in Bucharest at the time. Following an
improvement in the energy infrastructure in recent years the turbines became redundant and efforts were made to dispose of them. In the course of 2013 the turbines were written down
(EUR 6.3 million) to their Net Realizable Values based on most recent offering prices received from potential buyers. Refer to note 38 (B) for the selling of the turbines.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
97
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Casa Radio note
1. General
In 2006 the Company entered into an agreement according to which it acquired 75% interest in a company (“Project SPV”) which under a Public-Private Partnership
agreement (“PPP”) with the Government of Romania is to develop the Casa Radio site in central Bucharest (“Project”). After signing the PPP agreement, the
Company holds indirectly 75% of the shares in the Project SPV, the remaining 25% are held by the Romanian authorities (15%) and another third party (10%).
As part of the PPP, the Project SPV was granted with development and exploitation rights in relation to the site for a period of 49 years, starting December 2006.
In addition, the Project SPV has committed to construct a Public Authority Building (“PAB”) measuring approximately 11.000 square meters for the Romanian
Government at its own cost.
Large scale demolition, design and foundation works were performed on the construction site which amounted to circa EUR 85 million until 2010, when current
construction and development were put on hold due to lack of progress in the renegotiation of the PPP Contract with the Authorities (refer to point 3 below).
2. Obtaining of the Detailed Urban Plan (“PUD”) permit
The Project SPV obtained the PUD related to this project in September 2012. Furthermore, on 13 December 2012, the Court took note of the waiver of the claim
submitted by certain plaintiffs and rejected the litigation aiming to cancel the approval of the Zonal Urban Plan (“PUZ”) related to the Project. The court decision is
irrevocable.
As the PUD is based on the PUZ, the risk that the PUD would be cancelled as a result of the cancellation of the PUZ was removed following the date when the PUZ
was cleared in court on December 13, 2012.
3. Discussions with Authorities on construction time table deferral
As a result of point 2, following the Court decision, the Project SPV was required to submit a request for building permits within 60 days from the approval date of
the PUZ/PUD and commence development of its project within 60 days after obtaining the building permit.
However, due to substantial differences between the approved PUD and stipulations in the PPP Contract as well as changes in the EU directives concerning
buildings used by Public Authorities, and in order to ensure a construction process that will be adjusted to current market conditions, the Project SPV started
preliminary discussions with the Romanian Authorities (which are both shareholders of the Project SPV and a party to the PPP) regarding the future development
of the project.
The Project SPV also offi cially notifi ed the Romanian Authorities in order to renegotiate the existing PPP contract on items such as time table, structure and mile
stones (e.g the construction of the Public Authority Building (“PAB”), whose’ estimated costs are provisioned for in these fi nancial statement – refer to point 4 below).
The Company estimates that although there is no formal obligation from the Romanian Authorities to renegotiate the PPP agreement, such obligation is expressly
provided for the situation when extraordinary economic circumstances arise. Management believes that an agreement will be reached with the Authorities
regarding the future development of the project (management cannot assess at this stage the timing of reaching such agreement) and that the current discussions
with the Authorities bear no material exposure for the Company’s fi nancial position as of 31 December 2013.
4. Provision in respect of PAB
As mentioned in point 1 above, when the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 75% interest in the Project SPV it assumed a commitment to construct
the PAB at its own costs for the benefi t of the Romanian Government. Consequently, the Company had recorded a provision in the amount of EUR 17.1 million in
respect of the construction of the PAB. The Company utilized the amount of EUR 1.5 million out of this provision, but in the last 3 years has made no change in the
provision, in view of signifi cant changes that might be implemented to the project, mainly with the timing of the construction, and the construction specifi cations
depending upon the outcome of the negotiations with the Authorities. Management believes that the current level of provision is an appropriate estimation in the
current circumstances.
Upon reaching concrete agreements with Authorities, the Company will be able to update the provision.
Security over trading properties
As of December 31, 2013, a total carrying amount of EUR 223 million (December 31, 2012 – EUR 252 million) which represent operating shopping centers is
pledged against secured bank loans of approximately EUR 173 million.
98
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 11
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Write-down of trading properties
Trading properties are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Determining net realizable value is inherently subjective as it requires estimates of
future events and takes into account special assumptions in the valuations, many of which are diffi cult to predict.
Actual results could be signifi cantly different than the Company’s estimates and could have a material effect on the Company’s fi nancial results. Trading Properties
accumulated write-downs from cost as of December 31, 2013, amounted to EUR 222 million or 31% percent of gross trading properties balance (2012 – EUR 108
million or 15% of gross trading property balance).
These valuations becomes increasingly diffi cult as it relates to estimates and assumptions for projects in the preliminary stage of development in addition to
current economic uncertainty and the lack of transactions in the real estate market in the CEE and India for same or similar properties.
Management is responsible for determining the net realizable value of the Group’s Trading Properties. In determining net realizable value of the vast majority of
Trading Properties, management utilizes the services of an independent third party recognized as a specialist in valuation of properties (as at December 31, 2013
98% of the value of trading properties was based on valuations done by the independent third party valuation service (2012 - 99%). The remaining properties
were valued internally.
On an annual basis, the Company reviews the valuation methodologies utilized by the independent third party valuator service for each property. The main features
included in each valuation are:
1. Completed trading properties (operating shopping centers)
The Net Realizable Value of operating shopping centers refl ects rental income from current leases and assumptions about rental income from future leases in the
light of current market conditions.
The Net Realizable Value also refl ects, on a similar basis, any cash outfl ows that could be expected in respect of the property. The Group uses professional
appraisers for determining the Net Realizable Value of the operating shopping centers.
Independent valuation reports are prepared by Cushman & Wakefi eld by using discounted cash fl ow valuation techniques. The Group uses assumptions that are
mainly based on market conditions existing at the reporting date.
The principal assumptions underlying management’s estimation of Net Realizable Values are those related to the receipt of contractual rentals, expected future
market rentals, void periods, maintenance requirements and appropriate discount rates. These valuations are regularly compared to actual market yield data and
actual transactions made by the Group and those reported by the market, if available. Expected future rentals are determined on the basis of current market rentals
for similar properties in the same location and condition.
2. Incomplete trading properties (undeveloped plots of lands)
The net realizable value in case of an undeveloped project is determined by either:
• comparison with the sale price of land for comparable development; or
• assessment of the value of the project as completed and deduction of the costs of development (including developer’s profi t) to arrive at the underlying land
value. This is known as the residual method.
2a – Comparative method
Valuation by comparison is essentially objective in that it is based on an analysis of the price achieved for sites with broadly similar development characteristics.
Valuation by comparison is generally used if evidence of actual sales can be found and analyzed on a common unit basis, such as site area, developable area or
habitable room.
Where comparable development cannot be identifi ed in the immediate area of the subject site or when sales information is not clearly available through common
channels of information (internet, newspapers, trade journals, periodic market research) it is necessary to look further out for suitable comparables and to make
necessary adjustments to the price in order to account for dissimilarities between the comparables development and the subject site. Such adjustments include,
but not limited to:
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
99
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
• Adjustment because of the time of the transaction. Market conditions at the time of the sales transaction of a comparable property may differ from those on
the valuation date of the property being valued. Factors that impact market conditions include rapidly appreciating or depreciating property values, changes in
tax laws, building restrictions or moratoriums, fl uctuations in supply and demand, or any combination or forces working in concert to alter market conditions
from one date to another.
• Adjustment because of asking price and condition of payment. The special motivations of the parties to the transaction in many situations can affect the prices
paid and even render some transactions as non-market. Examples of special conditions of sale include a higher price paid by a buyer because the parcel has
synergistic, or marriage value; a lower price paid because a seller was in a hurry to conclude the sale; a fi nancial, business, or family relationship between
the parties involved in the transaction, unusual tax considerations; lack of exposure of the property in the (open) market; or the prospect of lengthy litigation
proceedings.
• Adjustment because of size, shape and surface area. Where the physical characteristics of a comparable property vary from those of the subject property, each
of the differences is considered, and the adjustment is made for the impact of each of these differences on value.
• Adjustment because of location. The locations of the comparable sale properties and the subject property are compared to ascertain whether location and
the immediate environment are infl uencing the prices paid. The better location a property is located in the more it is worth per square meter; and conversely
the worse location a property is in the less it is worth per square meter. An adjustment is made to refl ect such differences based on the valuers’ professional
experience. Extreme location differences may indicate that a transaction is not truly comparable and are disqualifi ed.
2b – Residual method
The residual method, in contrast, relies on an approach that is a combination of comparison and cost and it requires making a number of assumptions – any of
which can affect the outcome in varying degrees.
Having established the development potential a residual valuation can be expressed as a simple equation: (value of completed development) – (development costs
+ developers profi t) = land value. Each element of this equation is discussed in the following paragraphs.
Value of completed development
The value of the completed development is the market value of the proposed development assessed on the special assumption that the development is complete
as at the date of valuation in the market conditions prevailing at that date.
Development costs
The development costs include planning and design costs, construction costs, site related costs, holding costs, fi nance costs and contingencies.
Some larger schemes such as Casa Radio in Romania, Bangalore and Chennai in India are phased over time. Is such case the phasing is refl ected in the cash
fl ows as deferment of some of costs to a date when it might be reasonable to expect them to be incurred. Similarly, not all receipts occur simultaneously.
Developer’s profi t
The nature of the development determines the selection of the profi t margin, or rate of return and the percentage to be adopted varies for each case. The
developers profi t is expressed as a percentage of the cost of the completed development.
All of the trading properties were valued using the Residual technique (or the Discounted Cash Flows technique for operating shopping centers) with the exception
of four projects (2012: six projects) with a total amount of EUR 15.5 million (2012: EUR 25.7 million) using the comparative method.
All the trading properties carrying amounts equals their net realizable values with the exception of Torun´, Suwałki and Łódz´ (Residential) in Poland and Casa Radio
project in Romania. (2012: Torun´, Suwałki and Łódz´ (Residential) in Poland, Casa Radio and Timis¸oara in Romania and Belgarde Plaza (Visnjicka) project in
Serbia), where the carrying amount refl ects the cost.
3. Signifi cant estimates
The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which
are equity accounted:
100
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 11
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Group of assets
Valuation technique
Signifi cant unobservable inputs
Inter-relationship between key
unobservable inputs and fair value
measurement
Operating shopping centers –
Poland
Operating shopping center –
Latvia (Joint Venture)
Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation
model considers the present value
of the net cash fl ows expected to be
generated by the shopping centers. The
cash fl ow projections include specifi c
estimates for 10 years. The expected
net cash fl ows are discounted using a
risk-adjusted discount rate.
Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation
model considers the present value
of the net cash fl ows expected to be
generated by the shopping centers. The
cash fl ow projections include specifi c
estimates for 10 years. The expected
net cash fl ows are discounted using a
risk-adjusted discount rate.
• Estimated rental prices per SQM
(EUR 3–40.0, weighted average
EUR 6.56).
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
• Estimated exit yield is 8.75%.
• Discount rate is 10.25%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
achieved within 2 years
• the estimated discount rates were lower
(higher);
• The occupancy of the mall was higher
(lower).
• Estimated rental prices per SQM
(EUR 5.10–72.0, weighted average
EUR 12.50).a
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
• Estimated exit yield is 8.00%.
• Discount rate is 9.25%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
achieved within 1 year
• the estimated discount rates were lower
Operating shopping center –
Serbia
Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation
model considers the present value
of the net cash fl ows expected to be
generated by the shopping centers. The
cash fl ow projections include specifi c
estimates for 10 years. The expected
net cash fl ows are discounted using a
risk-adjusted discount rate.
• Estimated rental prices per SQM
(EUR 8–25.0, weighted average
EUR 13.91).
• Estimated exit yield is 9.00%.
• Discount rate is 11.00%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate
(higher);
• The occupancy of the mall was higher
(lower).
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
• the estimated discount rates were lower
(higher);
• The occupancy of the mall was higher
(lower).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
101
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which
are equity accounted:
Group of assets
Valuation technique
Signifi cant unobservable inputs
Inter-relationship between key
unobservable inputs and fair value
measurement
Operating shopping center –
Czech Republic
Plots in CEE
(except Casa Radio)
Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation
model considers the present value
of the net cash fl ows expected to be
generated by the shopping centers. The
cash fl ow projections include specifi c
estimates for 10 years. The expected
net cash fl ows are discounted using a
risk-adjusted discount rate.
• Estimated rental prices per SQM
(EUR 6.00–42.0, weighted average
EUR 16.00).
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
• Estimated exit yield is 8.35%.
• Discount rate is 10.02%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
achieved within 1 year
• the estimated discount rates were lower
(higher);
• The occupancy of the mall was higher
(lower).
Residual method: The valuation
model considers the net present value
(based on an NPV factor) based on
the estimated value of the project
upon completion less the estimated
development cost including a
provision for the profi t for the potential
development;
• Estimated weighted average rental
prices per SQM is between EUR
14.00 to EUR 20.00;
• The Estimated Exit Yield for the
projects are between 8.00%
• The construction cost of the projects
are between 400 EUR/sqm for retail
parks to 1,100 EUR /sqm for the
malls;
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
• the estimated discount rates were lower
(higher);
• The construction cost of the project were
• The development fi nance rate is
lower (higher);
7.00%
• The occupancy of the projects at
opening are estimated at 95%.
• The developer’s profi t provision for the
project were lower (higher);
• The development fi nance provision for
the project were lower (higher);
• The estimated completion of the project
were shorter (longer);
• The occupancy of the mall were higher
(lower);
• The land prices for comparable
transactions on the market would be
higher (lower)
• The characteristics of the project would
be changed;
102
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 11
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which
are equity accounted:
Group of assets
Valuation technique
Signifi cant unobservable inputs
Inter-relationship between key
unobservable inputs and fair value
measurement
Casa Radio
Residual method: The valuation
model considers the net present value
(based on an NPV factor) based on
the estimated value of the project
upon completion less the estimated
development cost including a
provision for the profi t for the potential
development
• Estimated weighted average rental
prices per SQM EUR 29.00;
• The Estimated Exit Yield is 7.00%
for the mall and 8.00% for the offi ce
component
• The construction cost of the project is
1,400 EUR/sqm for the mall; 850 EUR/
sqm for the offi ces; 600 EUR/sqm for
the residential component
The estimated fair value would increase
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were
higher (lower);
• the estimated yield rates were lower
(higher);
• The construction cost of the project were
lower (higher);
• The developer’s profi t provision for the
• The development fi nance rate is
project were lower (higher);
7.00%
• The occupancy of the project at
opening is estimated at 95%
• The development fi nance provision for
the project were lower (higher);
• The estimated completion of the project
• The scheme would compose the
were shorter (longer);
following components: (i) retail; (ii)
offi ces; (iii) residential
• The occupancy of the mall were higher
(lower);
Bangalore and Chennai
(Joint Ventures)
Residual method was used as well as
follows: The valuation model considers
the net present value (based on an NPV
factor) based on the estimated value of
the project upon completion less the
estimated development cost including a
provision for the profi t for the potential
development
For residual approach:
• The sales price per sqm for the
development is between INR 92,000
and INR 126,000 subject to the size,
location and the quality of the asset
class
• The construction cost per sqm for the
development is INR 21,000 to INR
38,000 subject to location and the
quality of the asset class
• The characteristics of the project would
be changed
The estimated residual fair value would
increase (decrease) if:
• the estimated sales prices per sqm were
higher (lower);
• the estimated construction cost were
lower (higher);
• The development fi nance provision for
the project were lower (higher);
• The estimated completion of the project
were shorter (longer);
• The characteristics of the project would
be changed;
• The developer’s profi t provision for the
project were lower (higher)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
103
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
t
s
o
C
n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C
%
0
1
-
%
5
-
-
%
5
%
0
1
%
0
1
-
%
5
-
-
t
n
e
R
%
5
%
0
1
s
p
b
0
5
+
s
p
b
5
2
+
0
s
p
b
5
2
-
s
p
b
0
5
-
d
l
e
i
Y
y
t
r
e
p
o
r
P
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
0
3
6
,
6
4
1
5
4
4
,
2
5
1
0
3
2
,
8
5
1
5
6
0
,
4
6
1
0
3
8
,
9
6
1
5
7
1
,
9
4
1
5
8
5
,
3
5
1
0
3
2
,
8
5
1
5
7
1
,
3
6
1
0
7
4
,
8
6
1
s
r
e
t
n
e
c
i
g
n
p
p
o
h
s
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
n
a
i
b
r
e
S
5
2
2
,
9
3
0
0
5
,
0
4
5
7
7
,
1
4
0
5
0
,
3
4
5
2
3
,
4
4
5
7
5
,
9
3
5
2
6
,
0
4
5
7
7
,
1
4
5
7
9
,
2
4
5
2
2
,
4
4
r
e
t
n
e
c
i
g
n
p
p
o
h
s
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
h
s
i
l
o
P
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
h
c
e
z
C
0
0
8
,
6
1
5
2
5
,
7
1
5
7
6
,
7
1
0
5
9
,
8
1
5
7
6
,
9
1
5
2
6
,
6
1
0
5
1
,
7
1
5
7
6
,
7
1
0
5
2
,
8
1
0
5
8
,
8
1
r
e
t
n
e
c
i
g
n
p
p
o
h
s
:
s
n
o
i
t
a
u
a
v
l
n
i
d
e
s
u
s
t
u
p
n
i
y
e
k
n
i
s
e
g
n
a
h
c
i
g
n
w
o
l
l
o
f
e
h
t
i
g
n
m
u
s
s
a
,
)
R
U
E
f
o
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
(
s
t
c
e
o
r
p
j
n
i
a
t
r
e
c
f
o
e
u
l
a
v
n
o
s
i
s
y
l
a
n
a
y
t
i
v
i
t
i
s
n
e
s
s
e
d
i
v
o
r
p
e
l
b
a
t
i
g
n
w
o
l
l
o
f
e
h
T
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
A
/
N
5
7
6
,
2
8
0
0
2
,
5
8
5
2
7
,
7
8
0
5
2
,
0
9
5
7
7
,
2
9
5
2
5
,
2
8
0
5
0
,
5
8
5
2
7
,
7
8
5
7
5
,
0
9
0
0
6
,
3
9
)
%
0
5
s
i
t
s
o
C
n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C
%
0
1
-
%
5
-
-
%
5
%
0
1
%
0
1
-
%
5
-
-
t
n
e
R
%
5
%
0
1
s
p
b
0
5
+
s
p
b
5
2
+
0
s
p
b
5
2
-
s
p
b
0
5
-
d
l
e
i
Y
E
E
C
n
i
s
t
o
l
P
0
0
4
,
9
1
0
5
3
,
7
1
0
0
3
,
5
1
0
5
2
,
3
1
0
0
2
,
1
1
5
7
6
,
9
0
0
5
,
2
1
0
0
3
,
5
1
5
2
1
,
8
1
0
5
9
,
0
2
5
7
3
,
2
1
0
0
8
,
3
1
0
0
3
,
5
1
0
0
9
,
6
1
5
7
5
,
8
1
a
z
a
l
P
s
a
e
r
i
P
a
z
a
l
P
e
d
a
r
g
l
e
B
0
0
1
,
2
2
5
2
1
,
9
1
0
5
1
,
6
1
0
5
1
,
3
1
5
7
1
,
0
1
5
2
2
,
8
5
7
1
,
2
1
0
5
1
,
6
1
0
0
1
,
0
2
0
5
0
,
4
2
0
0
0
,
3
1
5
2
5
,
4
1
0
5
1
,
6
1
0
5
8
,
7
1
0
5
6
,
9
1
)
P
U
M
(
5
2
6
,
8
0
2
5
7
3
,
1
9
1
0
5
1
,
4
7
1
0
0
9
,
6
5
1
5
7
6
,
9
3
1
0
5
2
,
2
2
1
0
0
2
,
8
4
1
0
5
1
,
4
7
1
0
0
1
,
0
0
2
5
2
0
,
6
2
2
0
0
0
,
9
4
1
0
5
1
,
1
6
1
0
5
1
,
4
7
1
0
5
0
,
8
8
1
0
5
9
,
2
0
2
i
o
d
a
R
a
s
a
C
.
s
u
t
a
t
s
s
t
c
e
j
o
r
p
n
i
a
m
r
o
f
e
l
b
a
t
y
r
a
m
m
u
s
a
s
i
f
a
e
l
r
e
v
O
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
n
a
i
v
t
a
L
r
e
t
n
e
c
i
g
n
p
p
o
h
s
%
0
0
1
-
e
r
u
t
n
e
V
,
d
e
s
o
l
c
s
i
d
e
u
l
a
v
e
r
a
h
s
y
n
a
p
m
o
C
i
t
n
o
J
n
i
d
l
e
h
(
104
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 11
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Purchase
Holding
Planned
Carrying
Carrying
Gross
amount
amount
Lettable December 31, December 31,
Project
Location
year Rate (%) Nature of rights
Permit status
Area (sqm)
2013 (MEUR)
2012 (MEUR)
Suwałki Plaza
Poland
2006
100
Ownership
Operating shopping center
20,000
38.7
Zgorzelec Plaza
Poland
2006
100
Ownership
Operating shopping center
13,000
17.1
Torun´ Plaza
Poland
2007
100
Ownership
Operating shopping center
40,000
67.4
(starting Q1 2010)
(starting Q2 2010)
Łódz´ (Residential)
Poland
2001
100
Ownership/
Planning permit valid
80,000*
5.5
(starting Q4 2011)
Łódz´ Plaza
Kielce Plaza
Leszno Plaza
Liberec Plaza
Poland
Poland
Poland
Czech Republic
Roztoky
Czech Republic
Koregaon Park Plaza
India
2009
2008
2008
2006
2007
2006
Perpetual usufruct
100
100
100
100
Perpetual usufruct
Planning permit pending
Perpetual usufruct
Planning permit pending
Perpetual usufruct
Planning permit valid
Ownership
Operating shopping center
35,000
33,000
16,000
17,000
(starting Q1 2009)
100
100
Ownership
Ownership
Disposed in July 2013
14,000*
Operating shopping center
41,000
(starting Q1 2012)
7.9
4.0
1.7
17.7
-
40.3
38.7
18.9
67.3
5.5
13.6
4.8
1.9
29.4
5.5
55.8
Casa Radio
Romania
2007
75
Leased for 49 years
Detailed Urban Plan
555,000*
152.3
157.8
Ias¸i Plaza
Slatina Plaza
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza
Hunedoara Plaza
Timis¸oara Plaza
Constant¸a Plaza
Csíki Plaza
Kragujevac Plaza
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Serbia
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) Serbia
Belgrade Plaza (MUP)
Serbia
Shumen Plaza
Bulgaria
Arena Plaza extension
Hungary
Pireas Plaza
Greece
Other small plots, grouped
Total
* GBA (sqm)
2007
2007
2008
2008
2007
2009
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2005
2002
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Currently
permit valid (“PUD”)
Planning permit valid
Planning permit valid
Planning permit valid
Planning permit valid
Zoning valid
Existing building
Planning permit valid
Operating shopping center
Construction lease
(starting Q1 2012)
period (99 years) with
subsequent ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Ownership
Location Permit valid
Under negotiations
Planning permit valid
Land use rights
Building permit valid
Ownership
Building permit valid
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
58,000
17,000
10,000
14,000
36,000
18,000
14,000
22,000
32,000
70,000*
20,000
40,000
26,000
11.6
1.7
3.5
2.4
10.8
6.3
5.6
41.8
19.0
16.2
2.1
3.4
15.3
2.9
13.1
1.8
6.1
2.9
14.8
11.3
10.0
42.1
25.9
45.5
4.6
3.4
27.3
4.5
495.2
612.5
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
105
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 12 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Land and
buildings
€’000
Equipment
€’000
Fixtures
and fi ttings
€’000
Airplane1
€’000
Cost
Balance at January 1, 2012*
Additions
Disposals
Exchange rate effect
Balance at December 31, 2012*
Additions
Disposals
Exchange rate effect
Balance at December 31, 2013
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
Balance at January 1, 2012*
Depreciation
Impairment expenses2
Disposals
Exchange rate effect
Balance at December 31, 2012*
Depreciation
Disposals
Exchange rate effect
Balance at December 31, 2013
Net carrying amounts
At December 31, 2013
At December 31, 2012
At January 1, 2012
7,181
-
-
-
7,181
-
-
-
7,181
2,606
85
-
-
-
2,691
85
-
-
2,776
4,405
4,490
4,575
4,529
462
(592)
(42)
4,357
75
(749)
(141)
3,542
3,421
370
-
(355)
(33)
3,403
194
(333)
(44)
3,220
322
954
1,108
1,397
-
-
-
1,397
-
-
-
4,737
-
-
-
4,737
-
-
-
1,397
4,737
1,020
34
-
-
-
1,054
17
-
-
1,071
326
343
377
2,567
127
449
-
-
3,143
127
-
-
3,270
1,467
1,594
2,170
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
Major additions/disposals/impairments during the period
1 The airplane of the Company is pledged as a security for a bank facility utilized for the purchase of the airplane. For the selling of the airplane refer to note 38(A).
2 In 2012, the Company recorded a loss due to impairment of its airplane of EUR 0.4 million, based on external valuation.
NOTE 13 - INVESTMENT PROPERTY
Balance at 1 January
Disposal of Investment property (refer to note 34(E))
Fair value revaluation (refer to note 29)
Balance at 31 December
2013
€’000
14,489
(10,222)
(4,267)
-
Total
€’000
17,844
462
(592)
(42)
17,672
75
(749)
(141)
16,857
9,614
616
449
(355)
(33)
10,291
423
(333)
(44)
10,337
6,520
7,381
8,230
2012
€’000
13,652
-
837
14,489
106
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 12 / note 13 / note 14
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 14 - EQUITY ACCOUNTED INVESTEES
The Group has the following interest (directly and indirectly) in the below joint ventures (the Group has no investment in associates), as at
December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Company name
Country
Activity
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Interest of holding
(percentage) as at
Interest of holding
(percentage) as at
Elbit Plaza USA LP (“EPUS”)1
Elbit Plaza USA II LP
P-One Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 2
Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd. (“EPI”)
Bas - Adams Invest S.R.L
Bas - Colorado Invest S.R.L
Bas - Malibu Invest S.R.L
Bas - Spring Invest S.R.L
Bas - Sunny Invest S.R.L
Bas - Primavera Invest S.R.L
Bas development S.R.L
SIA Diksna (“Diksna”)
USA
USA
India
Cyprus
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Romania
Inactive
Inactive
Residential
Mixed-use
large scale projects
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Latvia
Operating shopping center
Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.3
Hungary
SBI Hungary Ingatlanforgalmazó és Építo˝ Kft. (“Új Udvar”)3
Hungary
Mixed-use project
Mixed-use project
1 Refer also to note 34(H) for the dissolving of investee.
2 Refer also to note 34(D) for the selling of the investee.
3 Refer also to note 34(F) for the selling of the investees.
None of the joint ventures are publicly listed.
The movement in equity accounted investees (in aggregation) was as follows:
Balance as at 1 January
Investments in equity-accounted investees
Share in results of equity-accounted investees, net of tax
Reclassifi cation of EPUS1
Write-down of Equity-accounted investees2
Effect of movements in exchange rates
EPUS dissolved1
Equity-accounted investees disposed3
Balance as at 31 December4
N/A
50%
N/A
47.5%
25%
25%
12.5%
25%
25%
25%
25%
50%
N/A
N/A
2013
€’000
161,779
1,849
952
-
(56,417)
(15,036)
(32,410)
(20,576)
40,141
50%
50%
50%
47.5%
25%
25%
12.5%
25%
25%
25%
25%
50%
50%
35%
2012
€’000
156,334
2,113
1,475
32,364
(23,443)
(7,064)
-
-
161,779
1 EPUS was the top holding company of the US operations, holding all the discontinued operations in the US. Upon the disposal of all US assets, EPUS remained with undistributed cash
amounts, and had no activity, therefore the EPUS remaining asset was deemed not to be part of the discontinued operations, and therefore reclassifi ed to equity accounted investees.
EPUS was dissolved in March 2013, and all of the remaining cash in it was distributed as liquidation dividend to the owners. Refer also to note 34(H).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
107
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
2 Breakdown of the Group’s share of write downs (reversals of write downs) of trading properties projects held by equity accounted investees is as follows:
Project name (holding company name)
Bangalore (held by equity accounted investee EPI)
Chennai (held by equity accounted investee EPI)
Kharadi (held by equity accounted investee P-One)
Dream Island (held by equity accounted investee Ercorner)
BAS projects (Grouped – held by 7 different entities)
Riga Plaza (held by equity accounted investee Diksna)
Új Udvar (held by equity accounted investee SBI Hungary)
Total
The year ended
December 31, 2013
The year ended
December 31, 2012
€’000
31,017
20,745
4,311
-
-
(1,513)
1,857
56,417
€’000
-
-
1,157
12,183
10,055
(139)
187
23,443
3 Refer also to note 34(D) and 34(F) for the selling of Ercorner, Új Udvar and P-One.
4 As of December 31, 2013, the loan to equity accounted investee Diksna totalled EUR 7.04 million (December 31, 2012 – EUR 6.9 million). Other investment in equity accounted investees
is either through various equity instruments, or by loans to cover negative equity position considered part of the Group’s net investment in the investee.
Material joint ventures
Within the joint ventures, two joint ventures were deemed as material, and these are EPI (due to holding of major schemes in Bangalore and Chennai) and Diksna
(being the only active shopping center held through a joint venture). The summarized fi nancial information of the material joint ventures is as follows:
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2012
Current assets*
Trading properties
Interest bearing loans from banks – current liability
Other current liabilities
Group loan to Diksna
Net assets (100%)
Group share of net asset (50%)**
Purchase price allocated to trading property
Carrying amount of interest in joint venture
EPI
€’0000
1,274
46,752
-
(674)
-
47,352
23,676
-
23,676
Diksna
€’000
2,776
87,725
(59,046)
(1,275)
(14,078)
16,102
8,051
-
8,051
EPI
€’000
952
142,711
-
(1,279)
-
142,384
71,192
18,750
89,942
Diksna
€’000
3,100
84,700
(63,850)
(1,616)
(13,898)
8,436
4,218
-
4,218
* Including cash and cash equivalents in the amount of EUR 1.1 million (2012 - EUR 1.1 million).
** Though EPI is 47.5% held by the Company, the Company is accounted for 50% of the results, as the third party holding 5% in EPI is deemed not to participate in accumulated losses,
hence EI and the Company, the holders of the remaining 95% each account for 50% of the results of EPI.
108
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 14
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
The year ended
The year ended
The year ended
The year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2012
Revenue
Cost of operations
Interest expenses
Gain from refi nance of loan
Write downs (uplift)
EPI
€’000
-
-
-
-
(66,024)
Total net profi t (loss) and comprehensive income (100%)
(67,446)
Group share of Profi t (loss) and comprehensive income (50%)
(33,723)
Interest income on Diksna loan
Impairment of purchase price allocated to trading property
(18,750)
Total results from investee
(52,473)
Immaterial joint ventures information
Diksna
€’0000
10,122
(4,304)
(2,016)
1,800
3,026
7,666
3,833
90
-
3,923
EPI
€’000
-
-
-
-
(1,594)
(797)
-
(797)
Diksna
€’000
8,678
(3,892)
(2,186)
-
278
2,606
1,303
133
-
1,436
With the exception of EPI and Diksna, all other joint ventures are considered immaterial. Three of these joint ventures were sold in the course of 2013, one was
dissolved and the Company is currently negotiating for concluding a transaction in respect of the BAS projects as well. The aggregation of the information in
respect of these immaterial joint ventures was as follows (the Group’s part):
Current assets
Trading properties
Interest bearing loans from banks*
Current liabilities
Carrying amount of interest in joint venture
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
61
7,152
(5,727)
(70)
1,416
€’000
34,011
55,554
(26,529)
(2,366)
60,670
* As of December 31, 2013, the Company has recourse on interest payments of these interest bearing loans from banks. The loans bear interest of three months Euribor + margin of 6%.
Revenues
Cost of operations
Write downs (refer to impairment table above)
Loss and comprehensive income
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
801
(674)
(6,168)
(6,915)
€’000
7,171
(4,799)
(23,582)
(22,607)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
109
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 15 - DERIVATIVES
The table below summarizes the results of the 2013 and 2012 derivatives activity, as well as the outstanding derivatives as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Derivative type
Nominal
Fair value of
amount as of
derivatives at
December 31,
December 31,
2013
2013
Currency options1
N/A
Cross currency
Interest Rate SWAP2 N/A
Cross currency
Interest Rate SWAP N/A
Interest Rate Swap
EUR 25 million
EUR 30 million
EUR 35.5 million
(“IRS”) 13
IRS 24
IRS 35
Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
(222)
(475)
(213)
(910)
Gain
(loss)
in
2013
(2,364)
(251)
N/A
188
(31)
187
Fair value of
derivatives at
December 31,
2012
N/A
(817)
N/A
(706)
(1,136)
(661)
Gain
(loss)
in
2012
Maturity
date of
derivative
11,683
N/A
966
419
(62)
(462)
(661)
November 2013
Settled in January
2012
June 2014
December 2014
December 2017
(2,271)
(3,320)
11,883
1 Selling options strategy (by writing call and put options through major Israeli and foreign banks) in order to manage its foreign currency risk (EUR-NIS) inherent in its long-term
debentures series A and series B issued in NIS. The Company suspended its selling option strategy effective from July 1, 2013.
2 The Company was paying a fi xed interest of 6.98% based on a nominal EUR amount of EUR 15.1 million and receiving an interest of six months WIBOR + 4.5% with the same
amortization schedule as the Polish bonds (refer to note 21). The swap was settled in March 2013 for a cash payment of EUR 0.8 million, in order to release EUR 2.7 million restricted
cash served as guarantee in respect of the SWAP.
3 In respect of Suwałki project loan. The project company pays EUR fi xed interest rate of 2.13% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until June 30, 2014.
4 In respect of Kragujevac project loan. The project company pays EUR fi xed interest rate of 1.85% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until December 31, 2014.
Refer to note 33 for details on the guarantee.
5 In respect of Torun´ project loan. The project company pays fi xed interest rate of 1% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until December 31, 2017. Regarding
pledges in respect of derivative activity refer to note 33d(2).
None of the abovementioned activities (including 2013 transactions) qualifi ed for hedge accounting.
Fair value measurement
Fair values of the SWAP may be determined in whole or in part using valuation techniques based on assumptions that are not supported by prices from current
market transactions or observable market data, where current prices or observable market data are not available.
Factors such as bid-offer spread, credit profi le, collateral requirements and model uncertainty are taken into account, as appropriate, when fair values are
calculated using valuation techniques. Valuation techniques incorporate assumptions that other market participants would use in their valuations, including
assumptions about interest rate yield curves, and middle exchange rates, as determined by relevant central banks at each cut dates.
110
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 15 / note 16
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 16 - INTEREST BEARING LOANS FROM BANKS
This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings, which are measured at amortised cost. For more
information about the Group’s exposure to interest rate, foreign currency and liquidity risk, refer to note 32. All interest bearing loans from banks are secured.
Terms and conditions of outstanding loans were as follows:
December 31, 2013
€’000
December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
Non-current loans
Investment property secured bank loan
Other secured bank loan
Total
Current loans (including current maturities of long-term loans)
Trading properties secured bank loans
Investment property secured bank loans
Other secured bank loans
Total
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
Below is the breakdown of all outstanding bank loans:
Nominal interest rate
Currency
Torun´ project secured bank loan1
Liberec project secured bank loan2
Suwałki project secured bank loan1
Zgorzelec project secured bank loan1, 3
Kragujevac project secured bank loan1, 4
Koregaon Park project secured bank loan5
Koregaon Park project secured bank loan
3M EURIBOR+3%
3M EURIBOR+2.7%
3M EURIBOR+1.65%
3M EURIBOR+2.75%
3M EURIBOR+5%
13.25%
11.5%
Other secured bank loans
Other secured bank loans6
6M TELBOR+6%
3M USD LIBOR+4%
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
INR
INR
NIS
USD
Year of
maturity
2017
2014
2020
2016
2027
2021
2013
2013
2014
Investment property secured bank loan
3M EURIBOR+1.75%
EUR
2016
-
-
-
172,810
-
2,528
175,338
3,175
2,598
5,773
188,058
469
17,450
205,977
December 31,
2013
€’000
47,905
20,498
31,595
21,993
29,108
21,710
-
December 31,
Restated* 2012
Carrying amoung
€’000
49,028
21,066
32,303
21,608
30,123
26,943
6,987
172,810
188,058
-
2,528
2,528
-
17,268
2,780
20,048
3,644
Total interest bearing liabilities
175,338
211,750
1 IRS on bank loans – refer to note 15.
2 Liberec loan – recourse loan. Default in payment has occurred, and certain loan covenants are breached – the Company is on continuous negotiations with fi nancing banks for obtaining a
waiver.
3 Zgorzelec loan – mostly non-recourse loan (except a component of a EUR 2.25 million which is recourse) – Certain loan covenants are breached – the Company has obtained a waiver for
all covenants till maturity of the loan. The Company has also pledged it’s plot in Leszno, Poland (refer also to note 11) in favour of the fi nancing bank.
4 Kragujevac loan – non-recourse loan – Certain loan covenants are breached – the Company is in continuous negotiations with fi nancing banks for obtaining a waiver.
5 Koregaon Park loan – out of 2013 balance, an amount of EUR 14 million is recourse loan. Refer to note 34 (G) in respect of the selling of the Koregaon Park project.
6 In respect of the airplane held by the Company. Refer also to note 38(A).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
111
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Covenants
Since the Company has defaulted in its payments to bondholders, a cross-default clause covenant in most bank facilities might cause certain bank facilities to be
considered as breached, and therefore banks may demand immediate repayment of such facilities. The Company has therefore reclassifi ed all bank facilities to
short-term.
In certain cases, where a recourse loan is outstanding, the fi nancing bank can become a creditor of the Company itself, in case the proceeds from selling the
pledged asset do not cover the debt.
However, up to the date of approval of these fi nancial statements, there has been no such demand from any of the fi nancing banks for such immediate repayment
of any of the bank facilities, and the Company’s management estimates that no such demand will take place before the fi nalization of the restructuring process.
NOTE 17 - TRADE PAYABLES
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Currency
€’000
Restated* €’000
Construction related payables
Other trade payables
Mainly in INR
1,115
1,317
2,432
3,549
4,020
7,569
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
Main decrease in 2013 is attributable to payment to construction suppliers in respect of the projects in India, Poland and Serbia.
NOTE 18 - RELATED PARTIES PAYABLES
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Currency
€’000
Restated* €’000
EI Group- ultimate parent company – expenses recharged
Other related parties
EUL (parent company)
EUR, USD
EUR
EUR, USD
672
272
-
944
144
15
387
546
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
For payments (including share based payments) to related parties refer to note 35. Transactions with related parties are priced at an arm’s length basis.
112
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 17 / note 18 / note 19 / note 20
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 19 - OTHER LIABILITIES
Short-term
Obligations to tenants
Advance payment in respect of selling of shopping center (refer to note 34(G))
Loan from non-controlling interest
Obligation in respect of plot purchase
Accrued bond and bank interest
Accrued expenses and commissions
Government institutions and fees
Salaries and related expenses
Other
Total
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
Currency
€’000
Restated* €’000
EUR
INR
EUR
Mainly EUR
Mainly NIS
2,613
2,343
1,455
1,380
2,377
305
416
174
156
11,219
2,645
-
1,454
1,380
803
505
361
275
225
7,648
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
NOTE 20 - DEBENTURES AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
The Company is measuring part of its debentures Series A (raised in July 2007) and debentures Series B (raised in February and May 2008 and listed in the Tel
Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”) at fair value through profi t or loss. Both debentures principal are updated based on the change in the Israeli Consumer Price Index
(“CPI”), meaning that every 1 percent change in Israeli CPI is causing a one (1) percent change in the principal value of the bond, and also on the interest paid.
Indexation is made on a monthly basis.
Accrued interest on both debentures is paid every six months. Debentures Series A and Series B raised from 2009 onwards are presented at amortized cost (refer
to note 21). Below is a summary of information on the debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss:
Series A debentures
Series B debentures
Fair value
CPI adjusted
Par value
Fair value
CPI adjusted
Par value
Total Par value
January 1, 2013 (TNIS)
138,366
203,150
Reissuance (repayment) 2013 (TNIS)*
December 31, 2013 (TNIS)
173,554
January 1, 2013 (TEUR)
December 31, 2013 (TEUR)
28,120
36,294
229,868
41,286
48,071
171,652
18,941
190,593
34,884
39,857
433,147
549,490
294,989
88,027
61,689
373,313
111,671
78,068
478,774
(159,591)
319,183
97,300
66,748
650,426
(140,650)
509,776
* One fi fth of outstanding Series A bond was scheduled to be repaid on December 31, 2013. However, all payments on both Series A and B were withheld effective November 2013 (refer
also to note 34(A)). One third of outstanding debentures Series B (with par value of NIS 159,591 thousands) was repaid on July 1, 2013 in a total amount of EUR 39.1 million (2012 –
repayment of NIS 193,922 thousands par value in a total amount of EUR 44.6 million).
Both debentures series are rated (effective as of the reporting date and of signing these fi nancial statements) D by S&P Maalot Ltd. on a local scale (down from ilB
in November 2013). The update followed the Company’s announcement that it would withhold payment on the upcoming debentures maturities.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
113
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Prior to the Group’s default and the potential impact of the restructuring plan (see note 34(A)) Debentures Series A bear an annual interest rate of 4.5% (to be paid
semi-annually) with 8 annual equal par value principal instalments between December 2010 and 2017; and Debentures Series B bear an annual interest rate of
5.4% (paid semi-annually) with 5 annual equal par value principal instalments between July 2011 and 2015.
All debentures were reclassifi ed to current liabilities, in view of the decision to withhold all payments to creditors, which was an event of default. For more details
on the debt restructuring plan, refer to note 34(A).
Fair value
The fair value of debentures is determined by an active market price quotation, as the debentures are traded in the TASE.
NOTE 21 - DEBENTURES AT AMORTISED COST
Bonds issued in Israel
January 1, 2013 (NIS)
Re-issuance
Repayment 2013*
December 31, 2013
Series A debentures
Series B debentures
Par value
TNIS
-
54,577
-
54,577
Par value
TNIS
251,251
8,800
(86,684)
173,367
Total
TNIS
251,251
63,377
(86,684)
227,944
CPI adjusted
CPI adjusted
TNIS
288,362
TEUR
58,603
268,592
56,168
* One fi fth of the outstanding Series A bond was scheduled to be repaid on December 31, 2013. However, all payments on both Series A and B debentures were withheld effective November
2013 (refer also to note 34(A)).
One third of outstanding debentures Series B (with par value of NIS 86,684 thousands) was repaid on July 1, 2013 in a total amount of EUR 21.2 million (2012 –
repayment of NIS 86,074 thousands par value in a total amount of EUR 20.7 million)
Bonds issued in Poland
On November 16, 2010, the Company completed the fi rst tranche of a bond offering to Polish institutional investors. The Company raised a total of PLN 60 million
(approximately EUR 15.2 million).
Prior to the Group’s default and the potential impact of the restructuring as described in note 34(A), the unsecured bearer bonds governed by Polish law (the
“Bonds”) had a three year maturity at an interest rate of six months Wibor plus 4.5%. Interest was to be paid every six months and the principal due in November
2013. However, this payment, as well as all other payments on debentures were withheld effective November 2013 (refer also to note 34(A)).
For debt covenants refer to note 33d(3).
As at December 31, 2013, the amortized cost is EUR 14,468 thousands (December 31, 2012- EUR 14,678 thousands).
114
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 20 / note 21 / note 22
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 22 - RECOGNIZED DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Deferred taxes recognized are attributable to the following items:
December 31, 2012
Recognized in
December 31,
Assets/(liabilities) 2013
Investment property
Property, equipment and other assets
Debentures and structures at fair value through profi t or loss
Derivatives
Available for sale fi nancial assets*
Tax value of loss carry-forwards recognized**
Deferred tax liability, net
Restated1
€’000
(1,003)
(293)
(9,588)
(1,569)
(184)
5,707
(6,930)
Profi t or loss 2013
€’000
1,003
(86)
9,588
1,569
184
(5,707)
(6,551)
* Transferred to profi t or loss, following the disposal of all available for sale fi nancial assets.
** Due to tax losses created on the Company.
1 Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
December 31,
2011 restated1
Recognized in
Recognized in
Profi t or loss
comprehensive income
Assets/(liabilities) 2012
Investment property
Property, equipment and other assets
€’000
(804)
(292)
Debentures and structures at fair value through profi t or loss (14,496)
Derivatives
Available for sale fi nancial assets*
Tax value of loss carry-forwards recognized
Deferred tax liability, net
* Change included in comprehensive income.
(1,391)
446
3,348
(13,189)
€’000
(199)
(1)
4,908
(178)
-
2,359
6,889
€’000
-
-
-
-
(630)
-
(630)
2013
€’000
-
(379)
-
-
-
-
(379)
December 31,
2012 Restated1
€’000
(1,003)
(293)
(9,588)
(1,569)
(184)
5,707
(6,930)
1 Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
Unrecognized deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of tax losses in a total amount of EUR 90,043 thousands (2012: EUR 91,574 thousand).
Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of these items because it is not probable that future taxable profi t will be available against which the
Group can utilize the benefi ts there from. As of December 31, 2013 the expiry date status of tax losses to be carried forward is as follows:
Total tax losses carried forward
2014
2015
130,459
10,991
21,113
2016
8,249
2017
2018
After 2018
12,061
16,605
61,440
Tax losses are mainly generated from operations in Czech Republic, Romania, Serbia, Latvia and the Netherlands. Tax settlements may be subjected to
inspections by tax authorities. Accordingly, the amounts shown in the fi nancial statements may change at a later date as a result of the fi nal decision of the tax
authorities.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
115
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 23 - EQUITY
December 31, 2013
Remarks
Number of shares
December 31, 2012
Number of shares
Authorized ordinary shares of par value EUR 0.01 each
1,000,000,000
1,000,000,000
Issued and fully paid:
At the beginning of the year
Exercise of share options
At the end of the year
See (a) below
297,186,138
-
297,174,515
11,623
297,186,138
297,186,138
a. In the course of 2012, 108,335 vested options were exercised into 11,623 shares of EUR 0.01. In the course of 2013 there was no exercise of options.
Share based payment reserve
Other capital reserve is in respect of Employee Share Option Plans (“ESOP”) in the total amount of EUR 35,313 as of December 31, 2013 (2012 – EUR 34,889).
Regarding the amendments of ESOP 1 and ESOP No. 2 and its effect on other capital reserves refer to note 25.
Translation reserve
The translation reserve comprises, as of December 31, 2013, all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the fi nancial statements of foreign
operations in India.
Dividend policy
Following the withholding of payments of all corporate level debt and in line with the restructuring plan (refer to note 34(A)), the Company’s Board of Directors
and management will commit to certain restrictions on dividends.
116
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 23 / note 24 / note 25
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 24 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) at December 31, 2013 was based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of EUR 218,073 thousand
(2012: loss of EUR 86,163 thousand) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding of 297,181 thousand (2012: 297,181 thousand).
The calculation of basic EPS at December 31, 2013 from continuing operations was based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of EUR 218,138
thousand (2012 – EUR 84,119 thousand).
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (for both EPS and EPS from continuing operations)
In thousands of shares with a EUR 0.01 par value
Issued ordinary shares at 1 January
Share based payment - exercise of options
Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 31 December
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
297,181
-
297,181
€’000
297,175
6
297,181
The calculation of diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for comparative fi gures is calculated as follows:
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (diluted)
In thousands of shares with a EUR 0.01 par value
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (basic)
Effect of share options on issue
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (diluted) at 31 December
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
297,181
-
297,181
€’000
297,181
792
297,973
The average market value of the Company’s shares for purposes of calculating the dilutive effect of share options was based on quoted market prices for the
period that the options were outstanding.
Refer to note 37 for calculations of earnings per share from discontinued operation.
NOTE 25 - EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN
On October 26, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the grant of up to 33,834,586 non-negotiable options for the Company’s ordinary shares to the
Company’s board members, employees in the company and other persons who provide services to the Company including employees of the Group (“Offerees”).
The options were granted to the Offerees for no consideration.
On November 22, 2011 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved to amend the 1st ESOP to extend the Option Term (i.e.,
as defi ned in the 1st ESOP, being the term during which options can be exercised under the 1st ESOP) from seven (7) to ten (10) years from the Date of Grant. As
a result the Company record an incremental fair value of EUR 955,433 which were included in the consolidated income statement.
Furthermore, 2nd ESOP plan was adopted on November 22, 2011 which is based on the terms of the 1st ESOP as amended in accordance with the terms as
referred to above, with a couple of amendments, the most important of which is the total number of options to be granted under the 2nd ESOP is fourteen million
(14) and a cap of GBP 2.
It is noted that, on the basis of all 14 options being granted under the 2nd ESOP and fully exercised thereafter, this would have an effect of dilution of up to three
percent (3%) (on fully diluted basis) of the issued share capital as at October 2011.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
117
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
On November 22, 2012 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved to amend the 1st ESOP to extend the Option Term (i.e.,
as defi ned in the 1st ESOP, being the term during which options can be exercised under the 1st ESOP) from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from the Date of Grant.
As a result the Company record an incremental fair value of EUR 0.5 million which were included in the consolidated income statement.
Exercise of the options is subject to the following mechanism:
Grant date / employees entitled
ESOP No.1
Option grant to key management at October 27, 2006
Option grant to employees at October 27, 2006
Total granted in 2006
Total granted in 20072
Total granted in 20082
Total granted in 20092
Total granted in 20102
Total granted in 20112
ESOP No.2
Total granted in 20112
Total granted in 20122
Total granted in 20132
Vesting
conditions
Contractual life
options1
Number
of options
13,218,073
1,894,020
15,112,093
1,109,490
768,887
441,668
see (3) below
see (3) below
see (3) below
see (3) below
see (3) below
Three years of service
-
Three years of service
150,000
Three years of service
4,874,000
Three years of service
970,000
Three years of service
1,465,000
Three years of service
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
10 years
Total share options Granted
24,891,138
1 Following the 4th amendment of ESOP1, the contractual life for stock options granted changed from 10 years to 15 years
2 Share options granted to key management: 2007 – 100,000 share options; 2008 – 260,000 share options; 2009 - 73,334 share options; 2011- 3,225,000 share options (ESOP No. 2);
2012 – 450,000 share options; 2013 – 150,000 share options.
3 Vesting conditions - On November 25, 2008 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved modifi cation of ESOP1. The amendment plan determined
that all options that were not vested on October 25, 2008 (“record date”) shall vest over a new three-year period commencing on the record date, in such way that each year following that
date one third of such options shall be vested. The number of options which were modifi ed under the amendment was 28,182,589.
On exercise date the Company shall allot, in respect of each option so exercised, shares equal to the difference between (A) the opening price of the Company’s
shares on the LSE (or WSE under certain conditions) on the exercise date, provided that if the opening price exceeds GBP 3.24, the opening price shall be set at
GBP 3.24 (Except 2nd ESOP as stated above); less (B) the Exercise Price of the Options; and such difference (A minus B) will be divided by the opening price of
the Company’s Shares on the LSE (or WSE under certain conditions) on the exercise date:
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Exercised during the year
Forfeited during the period - back to pool
Granted during the year
Outstanding at the end of the year
Exercisable at the end of the year
Weighted average
exercise price* 2013
GBP
0.43
-
0.45
0.29
0.43
Number of
Weighted average
exercise price* 2012
GBP
0.46
0.42
0.96
0.47
0.43
options
2013
24,997,557
-
(1,586,419)
1,650,000
25,061,138
21,070,033
Number of
options
2012
26,905,132
(108,335)
(2,989,240)
1,190,000
24,997,557
20,176,650
* The options outstanding at 31 December 2013 have an exercise price in the range of GBP 0.28 to GBP 0.54 (app. EUR 0.34 - EUR 0.65), and have weighted average remaining contractual
life of 8.16 years. The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised in 2012 was GBP 0.48.
118
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 25
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Following the modifi cations of the option plan, the maximum number of shares issuable upon exercise of all outstanding options as of the end of the reporting
period is 34,722,528.
The estimated fair value of the services received is measured based on a binomial lattice model using the following assumptions:
Key management
Key management
Employees
Employees
personnel 2013
personnel 2012*
€’000
€’000
2013
€’000
22,849
0.28
131,368
183,403
0.52
0.29
2012*
€’000
144,017
0.46
49.36%-49.85%
47.69%-59.8%
46.74%-49.9%
39.75%-59.8%
0.28
2
-
0.50
2
-
0.3
1.5
-
0.46
1.5
-
Fair value of share options and assumptions
Fair value at measurement date (in EUR)*
Weighted average Exercise price
Expected volatility
Weighted average share price (Gbp)
Suboptimal exercise multiple
Expected dividends
Risk-free interest rate
(based on the yield rates of the non indexed
linked UK treasury bonds)
0.33%-4.42%
0.31%-3.06%
0.18%-4.42%
0.24%-4.13%
* Not including information in respect of the amendment of the 1st ESOP.
During 2013 the total employee costs for the share options granted was EUR 424 thousands (2012 - EUR 1,419 thousands).
Due to low trading volumes, there is not enough information concerning Plaza share price. Therefore, in order to derive the expected stock price volatility, analysis
was performed based on the data of Plaza, and of three other companies operating in the similar segment, which have similar market capital and are traded at the
Warsaw Stock Exchange. In an attempt to estimate the expected volatility, fi rst calculation of the short-term standard deviation (standard deviation of company’s
share during one year as of the options’ Grant Date) has been done. In the next stage, calculation of the long-term standard deviation (standard deviation for the
period starting one year prior to the Grant Date for the remaining period of the plan) has been done, where the weight of the standard deviation for the Company
was ranging between 45% -65% and the weight of the average of standard deviations of comparative companies was 35% – 55% (2012: the same)The working
assumption is that the standard deviation of the underlying asset yield converges in the long-term with the multi-year average.
PCI and EPI Share Option plans
On March 14, 2011 (“Date of grant”) the Company’s direct subsidiaries PCI and EPI (“Companies”) granted non-negotiable options, exercisable into the
Companies’ ordinary shares, to employees, directors and offi cers of the Companies and/or affi liates of the Companies. The options were granted for no
consideration and have 3 years of vesting with contractual life of 7 years following the date of grant of such options. PCI had granted 14,212 share options with
exercise price of EUR 227 per option. EPI had granted 51,053 share options with exercise price of EUR 0.01 per option. PCI and EPI common shares valuation
methodology was based on NAV Model. The expected stock price volatility was based on 5 Indian publicly traded real estate companies and set to range
43.31%-54.4%. The annual risk free interest rate range was: 1.25% -4.03%. The suboptimal exercise multiple for key management personnel were set to 2 and
for employees 1.5 in 2011. The Option Plans include, among others, a Cashless Exercise mechanism prior to/following IPO and conversion upon the listing of a
subsidiary.
The total number of Underlying Shares reserved for issuance under PCI Plan and EPI Plan and any modifi cation thereof shall be 14,697 Underlying Shares and
52,600 Underlying Shares, respectively (representing approximately 5% of the share capital of the Companies on a fully diluted basis, inclusive of all Underlying
Shares).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
119
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 26 - RENTAL INCOME
a. Continuing operations (rental)
Rental income from operating shopping centers presented as Trading properties1
Other rental income2
Total
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
22,480
1,198
23,678
21,742
1,370
23,112
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 As of the end of 2013 and 2012, there are six operating shopping centers presented as part of trading properties.
2 Composed mainly from rental income generated by the Investment property Prague 3 (disposed in July 2013, refer to note 34(E)) in the amount of EUR 0.7 million (2012 – EUR 1.3
million). The rest of the rental income is attributed to small scale rental fees charged on plots held by the Group.
b. Continuing operations (entertainment centers)
Revenue from operation of entertainment centers is attributed to a subsidiary of the Company trading as “Fantasy Park” which provides gaming and entertainment
services in operating shopping centers. As of December 31, 2013, these subsidiaries operate in four shopping centers (December 31, 2012 – in 13 shopping
centers). Regarding the settlement reached in respect of legal claims against Fantasy Park refer to note 34(M). Following the settlement reached, seven of Fantasy
Park operation centers were closed.
Discontinued operation - For comparative revenues generated from discontinued operation, refer to note 37.
NOTE 27 - COST OF OPERATIONS
a. Continuing operations (cost of operations)
Active shopping centers presented as Trading properties1
Other cost of operations2
Total
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
8,187
1,221
9,408
7,994
1,390
9,384
* Restated mainly due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards. Additional reclassifi cation of EUR 3.5 million of mainly
marketing costs into cost of operations from administrative expenses was performed in order to better refl ect the Net Operating Income (NOI) of the operating shopping centers and
entertainment activities in the gross profi t line item.
1 Refer to note 26 (1) above.
2 Composed mainly from costs generated by the Investment property Prague 3 (disposed in July 2013, refer to note 34(E)) in the amount of EUR 0.3 million (2012 – EUR 0.5 million). The
rest of the cost is attributed to small scale costs on plots held by the Group.
120
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 26 / note 27 / note 28
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
b. Continuing operations (entertainment centers)
Refer also to note 26 (b) above. The costs are inclusive of management of the operation of the entertainment centers, as well as utility, rent and spent material
associated with the operation of the entertainment centers.
Discontinued operation – For comparative costs relating to discontinued operations, refer to note 37.
NOTE 28 - ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS
a. Administrative expenses, excluding restructuring costs
Salaries and related expenses
Professional services
Offi ces and offi ce rent
Travelling and accommodation
Depreciation and amortization
Others
Total
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
4,522
3,743
445
180
382
163
9,435
5,242
3,734
707
702
610
437
11,432
* Restated mainly due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards. Additional reclassifi cation of EUR 3.5 million of administrative
expenses (of mainly marketing costs) into cost of operations was performed in order to better refl ect the operation performance of active shopping centers and entertainment activities.
b. Restructuring costs
The Company incurred restructuring cost as a result of the restructuring process (refer to note 34 (A)).
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
121
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 29 - OTHER INCOME AND OTHER EXPENSES
Gain from selling property and equipment
Income from insurance company (refer to note 10)
Change in fair value of investment property1
Other income
Total other income
Impairment of property and equipment2
Impairment of Kochi advance (refer to note 10)
Impairments of other assets3
Change in fair value of investment property1
Other expenses
Total other expenses
Other income (expense), net
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 Refer to note 13.
2 Refer to note 12.
3 Mainly due to assets associated with trading property assets in Romania (Târgu Mures¸ and BAS).
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
23
-
-
390
413
-
(4,321)
(2,548)
(4,267)
(332)
11,468
(11,055)
19
7,611
837
503
8,970
(450)
-
-
-
(672)
(1,122)
7,848
122
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 29 / note 30 / note 31
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 30 - NET FINANCE INCOME (COSTS)
Recognized in profi t or loss
Foreign exchange losses on bank deposits, bank loans
Gain from bonds buyback programme
Interest income on bank deposits
Finance income from available for sale fi nancial assets
Interest income on structured deposits
Finance income from hedging activities through writing options
Changes in fair value of derivatives
Interest from loans to related parties
Finance income
Interest expense on debentures (including CPI)
Interest expense on bank loans
Changes of fair value in debentures measured at fair value through profi t or loss1
Loss from reissuance of bonds
Interest expenses on loans on structures
Finance costs from hedging activities through sale of options
Foreign exchange losses on debentures
Loss from available for sale fi nancial assets sold
Changes in fair value of structured deposit
Foreign exchange losses on bank deposits, bank loans
Cost of raising loans amortized to profi t or loss
Other fi nance expenses
Subtotal
Less- borrowing costs capitalized to trading properties under development
Finance costs
Net fi nance costs
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
17
-
119
956
-
-
93
103
1,288
(9,580)
(10,732)
(13,185)
(5,707)
-
(2,364)
(5,352)
-
-
-
-
(242)
(47,162)
6,530
(40,632)
(39,344)
-
4,333
1,025
712
2,085
11,683
199
321
20,358
(19,135)
(12,452)
(19,032)
-
(497)
-
(2,033)
(1,222)
(45)
(1,091)
(676)
(439)
(56,622)
19,091
(37,531)
(17,173)
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 The change in fair value includes a total of EUR 4 million (2012 – EUR 2.8 million) attributable to the credit risk of the Company.
NOTE 31 - TAXES
Tax recognized in profi t or loss
Current year
Deferred tax benefi t (refer to note 22)
Total
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
295
(6,551)
(6,256)
297
(6,889)
(6,592)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
123
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Deferred tax expense (tax benefi t)
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses
Total
Reconciliation of effective tax rate
Dutch statutory income tax rate
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
Tax at the Dutch statutory income tax rate
Recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses
Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
Current year tax loss for which no deferred tax asset is provided1
Non-deductible expenses
Tax Expense (Tax benefi t)
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
(6,551)
-
(6,551)
(4,368)
(2,521)
(6,889)
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
%
€’000
Restated* €’000
25%
25%
(224,394)
(56,098)
-
19,607
26,854
3,381
(6,256)
25%
(90,711)
(22,678)
(2,521)
5,169
13,395
43
(6,592)
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
1 2012 – Mainly due to impairments not recognized for tax purposes.
The main tax laws imposed on the Group companies in their countries of residence:
The Netherlands
a. Companies resident in the Netherlands are subject to corporate income tax at the general rate of 25%. The fi rst EUR 200,000 of profi ts is taxed at a rate of
20%. Tax losses may be carried back for one year and carried forward for nine years. As part of the measures to combat the consequences of the economic
crisis, taxpayers can elect for an extension of the loss carry back period to three years (instead of one year). The election is only available for losses suffered in
the taxable years 2009, 2010 and 2011. If a taxpayer makes use of the election, two additional limitations apply: (i) the loss carry forward period for the taxable
years 2009, 2010 and/or 2011 will be limited to a maximum of six years (instead of nine years); and (ii) the maximum amount of loss that can be carried
back to the second and third year preceding the taxable year will be limited to EUR 10 million per year. The amount of loss that can be carried back to the year
directly preceding the taxable year for which the election is made will remain unrestricted. As of the taxable year 2012, the election for extended loss carry
back is not available anymore and the regular loss carry back and carry forward limitations apply.
b. Under the participation exemption rules, income (including dividends and capital gains) derived by Netherlands companies in respect of qualifying investments
in the nominal paid up share capital of resident or non-resident investee companies, is exempt from Netherlands corporate income tax provided the conditions
as set under these rules have been satisfi ed. Such conditions require, among others, a minimum percentage ownership interest in the investee company and
require the investee company to satisfy at least one of the following tests:
- Motive Test, the investee company is not held as passive investment;
- Tax Test, the investee company is taxed locally at an effective rate of at least 10% (calculated based on Dutch tax accounting standards);
- Asset Test, the investee company owns (directly and indirectly) less than 50% low taxed passive assets.
124
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 31
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
India
The corporate income tax rate applicable to the taxable income of an Indian Company is 32.445% (including surcharge of 5% and cess of 3%) or 33.99%
(including surcharge of 10% and rate of 3%. Surcharge of 5% is applicable if the total income exceeds INR 10 million (EUR 0.12 million) but is less than INR
100 million (EUR 1.2 million) and 10% if the total income exceeds INR 100 million). Minimum alternate tax (MAT) of 20.01% (including surcharge of 5% and
cess of 3%) or 20.96% (including surcharge of 10% and cess of 3%) would apply on the taxable book profi ts of a company. Taxable book profi ts are computed in
accordance with relevant provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act. The fi nal tax payable is the higher of the MAT liability or corporate income tax payable. If taxes
are paid under MAT, then credit to the extent of MAT paid over corporate income tax is available (MAT credit). MAT Credit can be availed, if the company has future
taxable profi ts in the following ten years and credit to the extent of difference of the MAT payable and corporate income tax payable of the Company is allowed.
Capital gains on transfer of capital assets (on which tax depreciation has not been claimed) are taxed at the rate of 21.63% (Including surcharge of 5% and rate
of 3%) or 22.66% (including surcharge of 10% and cess of 3%), provided that the capital assets were held for more than 36 months immediately preceding the
date of the transfer or 32.445% (including surcharge of 5% and cess of 3%) or 33.99% (including surcharge of 10% and of 3 if they were held for less than 36
months (in case of capital asset being shares held in a company or any security listed on a stock exchange in India or unit of the Unit Trust of India or a Unit of
Mutual fund or Zero Coupon Bonds, a period of 12 months is considered). Dividends paid out of the profi ts are subject to Dividend Distribution Tax at the rate of
16.995% (including surcharge of 10% and rate of 3%) There is no withholding tax on dividends distributed by an Indian company and no additional taxes need to
be paid by the shareholder. Business losses can be offset against profi ts and gains on any business or profession for a period of eight years from the incurrence
year’s end. There is no limit for carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation.
India-Cyprus treaty issue
India has a Tax Treaty with Cyprus and under the Indian domestic tax laws, a resident of Cyprus would be eligible to claim recourse to the provisions of the
India-Cyprus Tax Treaty to the extent the provisions of the Tax Treaty are more benefi cial than those of the Indian domestic tax laws. The India-Cyprus Tax Treaty
contains more benefi cial provisions in respect of taxation of interest, capital gains etc. However, with effect from 1 November 2013, Cyprus has been notifi ed as
a Notifi ed Jurisdictional Area (“NJA”) under the Indian domestic tax laws due to lack of effective exchange of information with Cyprus. The notifi cation of Cyprus
as an NJA is an anti tax-avoidance measure and provides for onerous tax consequences in respect of transactions with Cypriot entities. The consequences of
entering into transactions with Cypriot entities in light of the NJA provisions are:
•
If a taxpayer enters into a transaction with a person in Cyprus, then all the parties to the transaction shall be treated as Associated Enterprises (“AE”) and
the transaction shall be treated as an international transaction resulting in application of transfer-pricing provisions contained in the Indian domestic tax law
including maintenance of prescribed documentation;
• No deduction in respect of any payment made to any fi nancial institution in Cyprus shall be allowed unless the taxpayer furnishes an authorization allowing for
seeking relevant information from the said fi nancial institution;
• No deduction in respect of any other expenditure or allowance arising from the transaction with a person located in Cyprus shall be allowed unless the taxpayer
maintains and furnishes the prescribed information;
•
If any sum is received from a person located in Cyprus, then the onus is on the taxpayer to satisfactorily explain the source of such money in the hands of such
person or in the hands of the benefi cial owner, and in case of his failure to do so, the amount shall be deemed to be the income of the taxpayer;
Any payment made to a person located in Cyprus shall be liable for withholding tax at the highest of the following rates - (a) rates prescribed in the domestic tax
laws (b) rates prescribed in the Tax Treaty (c) 30 per cent.
Despite the above, the Company does not expect the above to have a material effect on its business in India, as no additional material equity injections in India is
expected, and that disposal of assets is expected (if any) on an Indian level rather than on a Cypriot level.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
125
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 32 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Overview
The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of fi nancial instruments:
• Credit risk
• Liquidity risk
• Market risk
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing
risk, and the Group’s management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included in note 34(A).
The Board of Directors has established a continuous process for identifying and managing the risks faced by the Group (on a consolidated basis), and confi rms
that it is responsible to take appropriate actions to address any weaknesses identifi ed.
The Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to moni-
tor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to refl ect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities.
The Company’s Audit Committee oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures and reviews the
adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.
a. Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of fi nancial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a fi nancial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises
principally from the Group’s fi nancial instruments held in banks and from other receivables.
Management has a credit policy in place and the exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit evaluations are performed on all customers
requiring credit over a certain amount. The Group requires collateral in the form of mainly deposit equal to three months of rent from tenants of shopping centers
(collected deposits from tenants totalled EUR 2.6 million as at both December 31, 2013 and 2012).
Cash and deposits and other fi nancial assets
The Group limits its exposure to credit risk in respect to cash and deposits, including held for sale fi nancial assets (debt instruments) by investing mostly in
deposits and other fi nancial instruments with counterparties that have a credit rating of at least investment grade from international rating agencies. Given these
credit ratings, management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.
b. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its fi nancial obligations as they fall due. The Group encountered severe liquidity crisis during the
last months of 2013. It suspended all payments to its debt holders in November 2013 and sought for credit protection from the Dutch Court. Refer to note 34(A)
for more details.
c. Market risk
Currency risk
Currency risk is the risk that the Group will incur signifi cant fl uctuations in its profi t or loss as a result of utilizing currencies other than the functional currency of
the respective Group company.
The Group is exposed to currency risk mainly on borrowings (debentures issued in Israel and in Poland) that are denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency of the respective Group companies. The currencies in which these transactions primarily are denominated are the NIS or PLN. Regarding
currency and risk hedging of the debentures refer also to note 15. The company did not engage in hedging transactions in order to mitigate its currency risk
exposure, starting the second half of 2013.
126
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 32
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Interest Rate Risk (including infl ation)
The group’s interest rate risk arises mainly from short and long-term borrowing (as well as debentures). Borrowings issued at variable interest rate expose the
Group to variability in cash fl ows. Borrowings issued at fi xed interest rate (but are presented at their fair value) expose the Group to changes in fair value, if the
interest is changing. In certain case, the Group uses IRS to minimize the exposure to interest risk by fi xing the interest rate. Regarding interest rate risk hedging
of the debentures and bank facilities, refer to note 14. As the Israeli infl ation risk is diminishing to a level that management believes is acceptable (Israeli CPI 2013
1.9%; 2012 1.4%), the Company has stopped using cross currency SWAP instruments in 2012.
Shareholders’ equity management
Refer to note 34 (A) in respect of shareholders equity components in the restructuring plan. The Company’s Board of Directors is updated on an ongoing basis on
the progress of the restructuring process, to assure (among other things) that any changes in the shareholders equity (due to issuance of shares, options or any
other equity instrument) is to the benefi t of both the Company’s bondholders and shareholders.
Credit risk
The carrying amount of fi nancial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The vast majority of fi nancial assets are not passed due, and the management
believes that the unimpaired amounts that are past due by more than 30 days are still collectible in full, based on historic payment behavior and extensive analysis
of customer credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank deposits – short-term
Held for trading fi nancial assets
Available for sale debt securities
Trade receivables, net
Other receivables
Loan to Diksna
Restricted bank deposits – long-term
Total
Note
Credit quality
€’000
Restated* €’000
Carrying amount as
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2013
at December 31, 2012
5
6
7
8
9
14
Mainly Baa3
Mainly BBB+
Mostly BB+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26,157
6,319
1,246
-
3,372
4,871
7,039
181
49,185
35,374
18,759
-
11,714
3,399
11,492
6,949
779
88,466
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, all debtors without credit quality have a relationship of less than fi ve years with the Group. At 31 December 2013, the ageing
of trade and other receivables that were not impaired was as follows:
Neither past due nor impaired
Past due 1–90 days
Past due 91–120 days
Total
Carrying amount
Carrying amount
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
4,443
3,372
428
8,243
10,212
3,399
1,280
14,891
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
127
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
The maximum exposure to credit risk for the abovementioned table at the reporting date by type of debtor was as follows:
Banks and fi nancial institutions
Tenants
Governmental and insurance institutions
Loan to Diksna
Receivable due to selling equity accounted investee
Related parties and other
Total
Carrying amount
Carrying amount
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
Restated* €’000
33,903
3,372
1,877
7,039
2,350
644
49,185
66,958
3,399
9,829
6,949
-
1,331
88,466
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
Liquidity risk (refer also to note 34(A))
The following are the contractual maturities of fi nancial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:
December 31, 2013*
Derivative fi nancial liabilities
IRS Derivatives
Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities
Secured bank loans
Unsecured debentures issued
Trade and other fi nancial payables
Related parties
Carrying
amount
910
175,338
168,619
13,651
944
Contractual
cash fl ows
6 months
or less
(946)
(946)
(179,402)
(207,452)
(13,651)
(944)
(179,402)
(207,452)
(13,651)
(944)
Total
358,552
(401,449)
(401,449)
* In view of the restructuring procedure and the default in bond payments which triggered a cross default on all other loan facilities within the Group, all loan facilities are currently payable
on demand, triggering also repayments of trade and other payables, and therefore are reclassifi ed as to be paid within six months from the end of the reporting period. The restructuring
plan does not provide any protection from the banks rights to demand early repayment, including exercising the collateral, of loans provided to the Groups’ entities. As of the date of
approval of these consolidated fi nancial statements, there were no early repayment requests by any of the fi nancing banks.
December 31, 2012 Restated*
amount
cash fl ows
or less
months
Carrying Contractual
6 months
6-12
1-2
years
2-5
More than
years
5 years
Derivative fi nancial liabilities
IRS Derivatives
Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities
Secured bank loans
Unsecured debentures issued
Trade and other payables
Related parties
3,320
(3,483)
(1,023)
(1,023)
(986)
(452)
211,750
(261,423)
(16,459)
189,341
(255,706)
15,402
(15,554)
546
(546)
-
(361)
-
(23,308)
(90,688)
(9,377)
(546)
(36,925)
(71,098)
(1,380)
-
(87,030)
(93,920)
(4,436)
-
(97,702)
-
-
-
Total
420,359
(533,229)
(16,820)
(123,919)
(109,403)
(185,386)
(97,702)
* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.
128
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 32
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Currency risk
The Company’s main currency risk is in respect of its NIS denominated debentures. Following the discontinuance and full settlement of all currency options
effective July 2013, the Company is exposed to changes in EUR/NIS rate.
The following exchange rate of EUR/NIS applied during the year:
EUR
NIS 1
Average rate
Average rate
2013
0.208
2012
0.202
Reporting date
Reporting date
Spot rate
2013
Spot rate
2012
0.209
0.203
PLN denominated debentures - A change of 6 percent in EUR/PLN rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) profi t or loss by EUR 0.9 million,
as a result of holding PLN linked bonds.
NIS denominated debentures - A change of 11 percent in EUR/NIS (2012 – 10 percent) rates at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss
by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.
For the year ended
December 31,
2013
2012
Interest rate risk
Profi le
Profi t or loss effect
Profi t or loss effect
Carrying
amount of
debentures
154,151
174,663
NIS
strengthening
effect
(16,957)
(17,466)
NIS
devaluation
effect
16,957
17,466
As of the reporting date the interest rate profi le of the Group’s interest-bearing fi nancial instruments was:
Fixed rate instruments
Financial assets
Financial liabilities
Total
Variable rate instruments
Financial assets
Debentures
Other fi nancial liabilities
Total
Carrying amount
2013
€’000
Carrying amount
2012 Restated*
€’000
30,951
(21,710)
9,241
-
(168,619)
(153,628)
39,640
(33,930)
5,710
-
(189,341)
(178,005)
(322,247)
(367,346)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
129
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Cash fl ow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 5 basis points in EURIBOR interest rates (2012 – 30 basis points) at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the
amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same
basis for 2012.
Variable Interest rate effect (excluding debentures)
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
NIS Debentures
Profi t or Loss
Increase
Profi t or Loss
Decrease
(77)
(533)
77
533
Sensitivity analysis – effect of changes in Israeli CPI on carrying amount of NIS debentures
A change of 3 percent in Israeli Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) at the reporting date (and in 2012) would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the amounts
shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.
For the year ended
December 31,
2013
2012
Carrying
amount of
debentures
154,151
174,663
Profi t or loss effect
Profi t or loss effect
CPI
increase
effect
(4,625)
(5,240)
CPI
increase
effect
4,625
5,240
Sensitivity analysis – effect of changes in NIS basic Interest on carrying amount of NIS debentures
A change of 1 percent in Israeli basic interest rate at the reporting date (and on 2012) would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the amounts shown
below. The analysis relates only to debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss, as there is no effect on carrying amount of debentures presented at
amortized cost. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.
For the year ended
December 31,
2013
2012
Fair values
Carrying
amount of
debentures
97,983
116,147
Profi t or loss effect
Profi t or loss effect
Interest
increase
effect
(1,104)
(1,510)
Interest
decrease
effect
1,136
1,553
Fair values measurement versus carrying amounts
In respect to the Company’s fi nancial assets instruments not presented at fair value, being mostly short-term market interest bearing liquid balances, the Company
believes that the carrying amount approximates fair value.
In respect the Company’s fi nancial instruments liabilities:
For the Israeli debentures presented at amortized cost, a good approximation of the fair value would be the market quote of the relevant debenture, had they been
measured at fair value.
130
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 32
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Debentures at amortized cost – polish bonds
Debentures A at amortized cost – Israeli bonds
Debentures B at amortized cost – Israeli bonds
Carrying
amount
2013
14,468
13,765
42,403
Carrying
amount
2012
14,678
-
58,603
Fair
value
2013
14,468
10,393
33,507
Fair
value
2012
14,678
-
41,599
In respect of most of other non-listed borrowings, the Group was not asked to raise interest rates or to bring forward maturities as a result of the restructuring
procedure, as most fi nancing banks does not expect the restructuring procedure to have a material effect on the security the banks hold under non-recourse
loans, and therefore the Company has a basis to believe that the fair value of non-listed borrowings approximates the carrying amount.
Refer to notes 20 and 21 in respect of comparison between fair value and amortized cost of debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss.
Fair value Hierarchy
The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy. It does
not include fair value information for fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities not measured at fair value if the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair
value:
Financial assets not measured at fair value
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted bank deposits – short-term
Held for trading fi nancial assets
Available for sale debt securities
Trade receivables, net
Other receivables
Loan to Diksna
Restricted bank deposits – long-term
Total
Financial liabilities not measured at fair value
Interest bearing loans from banks
Debentures at amortized cost
Trade and other payables
Related parties
Total
Financial liabilities measured at fair value
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss
Derivatives
Total
Note
6
7
8
9
10a
14
Note
16
21
18
Note
20
15
Fair value
hierarchy
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2013
€’000
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
Level 2
26,157
6,319
1,246
-
3,372
4,871
7,039
181
49,185
35,374
18,759
-
11,714
3,399
11,492
6,949
779
88,466
Fair value
hierarchy
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2013
€’000
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
Level 2
Level 1
175,338
70,636
13,651
944
260,569
205,977
73,194
15,217
546
294,934
Fair value
hierarchy
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2013
€’000
Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
Restated* €’000
Level 1
Level 2
97,983
910
98,893
116,147
3,320
119,467
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
131
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 33 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
a. Contingent liabilities and commitments to related parties
1. The Company and/or its subsidiaries were parties to Projects Initiation and Supervision Agreement which was signed in 2006 between the Company and
Control Centers Ltd. (“Control Centers”).
Control Centers is a private company controlled by Mr Zisser, the former controlling shareholder of the Company. Europe-Israel (M.M.S.) Ltd. (“Europe-
Israel”) is an Israeli corporation wholly-owned by Control Centers (which in turn, is controlled by Mr Zisser).
Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the “Bank”) has instituted legal action to foreclose on its pledges, including, inter alia, all the assets of Europe-Israel securing Europe-
Israel’s obligations under a loan agreement with the Bank, including its shares in EI.
On July 21, 2013 a receiver was appointed to Control Centers Ltd. and Europe-Israel and on September 10, 2010 the Receiver had dismissed their
employees. Consequently, as of the date hereof the Company is not receiving the Services under the aforementioned agreement.
At December 31, 2013 the fi nancial statements does not include any liability in respect of engineering supervision services supplied by related parties in
Control Centers Group. For the total charges in 2013 and 2012 refer to note 35).
2. On October 27, 2006 the Company and Mr Zisser, an Executive Director of the Company, entered into a service agreement, pursuant to which he will
be entitled to a monthly salary of USD 25 thousand (EUR 19 thousand) which includes pension, retirement and similar benefi ts for his services as the
Company’s Executive Director.
3. In October 2006, the Company and EI entered into an agreement, pursuant to which with effect from 1 January 2006 the Company will pay commissions
to EI in respect of all and any outstanding corporate and fi rst demand guarantees which have been issued by EI in favour of the Company up to 0.5% of the
amount or value of the guarantee, per annum. As of the end of the reporting period the Group has no outstanding guarantees from EI and no consideration
was paid in this respect.
4. On October 13, 2006, EI entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Company, under which EI is obliged to offer to the Company potential real
estate development sites sourced by it in India. Under the agreement, EI is obliged to offer the Company the exclusive right to develop all of the shopping
center projects which EI acquires during the 15-year term of the Agreement. The Agreement was terminated upon the signing of the joint venture in India
(refer to note 34), but both EI and the Company agreed that upon the termination of the Joint Venture agreement they will re-execute the Agreement.
5. On November 25, 2007 the Company entered into an indemnity agreement with all of the Company’s directors and on June 20, 2011 with part of the
Company’s senior management – the maximum indemnifi cation amount to be granted by the Company to the directors shall not exceed 25% of the
shareholders’ equity of the Company based on the shareholders’ equity set forth in the Company’s last consolidated fi nancial statements prior to such
payment. No consideration was paid by the Company in this respect since the agreement was signed.
b. Contingent liabilities and Commitments to others
1. Tesco
The Company is liable to the buyer of its previously owned shopping center in the Czech Republic (“NOVO”) – sold in June 2006 – in respect to one of its
tenants (“Tesco”). Tesco leased an area within the shopping center for a period of 30 years, with an option to extend the lease period for an additional 30
years, in consideration for EUR 6.9 million which was paid in advance. According to the lease agreement, the tenant has the right to terminate the lease
agreement subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions as stipulated in the agreement. The Company’s management believes that it is not probable that this
commitment will result in any material amount being paid by the Company.
2. General commitments and warranties in respect of trading property and investment property disposals.
In the framework of the transactions for the sale of the Group’s real estate assets, the Group has undertaken to indemnify the respective purchasers for any
losses and costs incurred in connection with the sale transactions. The indemnifi cations usually include: (i) Indemnifi cations in respect of completeness of
title on the assets and/or the shares sold (i.e that the assets and/or the shares sold are owned by the Group and are clean from any encumbrances and/or
mortgage and the like). Such indemnifi cations generally survived indefi nitely and are capped to the purchase price in each respective transaction; and (ii)
Indemnifi cations in respect of other representation and warranties included in the sales agreements (such as: development of the project, responsibility to
132
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 33
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
defects in the development project, tax matter and others). Such indemnifi cations are limited in time (generally 3 years from signing a closing agreement)
and are generally capped to 25% to 50% of the purchase price. No indemnifi cations were provided by the Group till the date of the statement of fi nancial
position.
The tax authorities have challenged the applied tax treatment in two of the entities previously sold in Hungary by the Company to Klépierre in the course of
the Framework Agreement dated 30 July, 2004 (“Framework Agreement”). In respect of two of the former subsidiaries of the Company, the tax authorities
decision of reducing the tax base by and imposed a penalty in the sum of HUF 428.5 million (circa EUR 1.4 million), were challenged by the previously held
entities at the competent courts. Klépierre has submitted an indemnifi cation request claiming that the tax assessed in the described procedures falls into
the scope of the Framework Agreement tax indemnifi cation provisions and the Company in its respond rejected such claims.
The Company management estimates that no signifi cant costs will be borne thereby, in respect of these indemnifi cations.
3. The Company is retaining a 100% holding in all its projects in Serbia after it was decided to discontinue the negotiations with a Serbian developer. The
Company has a contingent obligation to pay the developer in any case there is major progress in the projects. The total remaining potential obligation is
EUR 0.9 million.
4. Apart from point 3 above, the Company does not have any contractual commitments in respect of construction activities.
c. Contingent liabilities due to legal proceedings
The Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Although the fi nal outcome of each of these cases cannot be estimated at
this time, the Company’s management believes, that the chances these litigations will result in any outfl ow of resources to settle them is remote, and therefore
no provision or disclosure is required.
d. Securities, guarantees and liens under bank fi nance agreements
1. Certain companies within the Group which are engaged in the purchase, construction or operation of shopping centers (“Project Companies”) have secured
their respective credit facilities (with withdrawn facility amounts totalling EUR 173 million, as of December 31, 2013) awarded by fi nancing banks (for
projects in Poland, Czech Republic, India and Serbia), by providing fi rst or second ranking (fi xed or fl oating) charges on property owned thereby, including
right in and to real estate property as well as the fi nanced projects, on rights pertaining to certain contracts (including lease, operation and management
agreements), on rights arising from insurance policies, and the like. Shares of certain Project Companies were also pledged in favour of the fi nancing
banks.
In respect of corporate guarantee for the fulfi lment of its subsidiaries obligations and joint ventures under loan agreements, refer to note 16 and note 14,
respectively.
Shareholders loans as well as any other rights and/or interests of shareholders in and to the Project Companies were subordinated to the respective credit
facilities.
Payment to the shareholders is permitted (including the distribution of dividends but excluding management fees) subject to fulfi lling certain preconditions.
Certain loan agreements include an undertaking to fulfi l certain fi nancial and operational covenants throughout the duration of the credit, namely:
complying with “a minimum debt services cover ratio”, “loan outstanding amount” to secured assets value ratio; complying with certain restrictions
on interest rates; maintaining certain cash balances for current operations; maintaining equity to project cost ratio and net profi t to current bank’s debt;
occupancy percentage and others. In respect of breach of covenants, refer to note 16.
The Project Companies undertook not to make any disposition in and to the secured assets, not to sell, transfer or lease any substantial part of their assets
without the prior consent of the fi nancing bank.
In certain events the Project Companies undertook not to allow, without the prior consent of the fi nancing bank:
(i) any changes in and to the holding structure of the Project Companies nor to allow for any change in their incorporation documents;
(ii) execution of any signifi cant activities, including issuance of shares, related party transactions and signifi cant transactions not in the ordinary course of
business;
(iii) certain changes to the scope of the project;
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
133
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
(iv) the assumption of certain liabilities by the Project Companies in favour of third parties;
(v) receipt of loans by the Project Companies and/or the provision thereby of a guarantee to third parties; and the like.
2. Commitment in respect of derivative transaction
Within the framework of three IRS transactions (refer to note 14), executed between the Group and commercial banks (the “Banks”), the Group agreed to
provide the Banks with cash or another collateral.
Accordingly, as of the end of the reporting period, the Company has pledged, a security deposit in the amount of EUR 0.3 million in respect of the
Kragujevac IRS transaction. In respect of the Suwałki IRS the project company also established a bail mortgage up to EUR 4 million encumbering the real
estate project. In respect of Torun´ IRS the project company also established a bail mortgage up to EUR 5.4 million encumbering the real estate project.
3. Commitment in respect of Bonds raised in Poland.
Under the offering memorandum for the issuance of Polish bonds, certain circumstances shall be deemed events of default giving the bondholders the
right to demand Early Redemption, which includes among others the following covenants:
a) Breach of the Cash Position as a result of the payment of dividend or the shares buy-back programme – if at any time during a period of 90 days from
the payment of dividend, or the acquisition of its own shares, the Cash Position falls below EUR 50 million;
b) Breach of fi nancial ratios – occurs if the Net Capitalization Ratio exceeds 70%; Net Capitalization Ratio (“the Ratio”) is the Net Debt divided by the
Equity plus the Net Debt, as calculated by the Group’s auditor; “Net Debt” mean the Group’s total debt under: loans and borrowings, lease agreements,
bonds, other debt securities and other interest bearing or discounted fi nancial instruments in issue, less related hedge derivatives, cash and cash
equivalents, short and long-term interest bearing deposits with banks or other fi nancial institutions, available for sale marketable securities and
restricted cash, calculated based on the Consolidated Financial Statements. As at the reporting date the Ratio was circa 60% (2012 – 44%).
c) Failure to repay material debt – the company fails to repay any matured and undisputable debt in the amount of at least EUR 100 million within 30 days
of its maturity.
NOTE 34 - SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
A. Debt restructuring plan (“the restructuring plan”)
The Company has been facing challenging market conditions for some years. These have primarily been caused by the underlying economic environment in
many of the countries in which the Company operates, combined with the lack of transactional liquidity in the investment markets for assets such as those
owned by the Company and the ongoing lack of traditional bank fi nancing available to real estate developers and investors. The signifi cant investments in India
and Romania, prior to the crisis, the increased issuance of debt and the slow pace of properties realization caused the Group to experience very signifi cant
losses and dragged the Group into cash fl ow distress.
Against this background, the Company’s management has made some progress improving its cash position, primarily through costs cutting program and the
disposal of certain properties.
In 2013, the Company has received net cash of circa EUR 61 million through the disposal of four assets (EUR 29 million) and the collection of the remaining
proceeds from the transaction in the US (EUR 32 million).
In addition, it has applied intensive asset management initiatives to improve the income generated by the operating shopping centers portfolio, and has also
managed to refi nance an EUR 59.3 million loan secured against one of its largest assets, held via a joint venture owned 50%, Diksna during November 2013
(refer to note 14).The Company continues to actively market for sale all of its operating shopping centers as well as some of its undeveloped lands.
However, despite efforts to progress with a number of asset disposals and a completion of some alternative fi nancing transactions, the Company was not able
to execute its asset disposal plan within a timeframe that would have enabled it to meet its short-term obligations towards bondholders, specifi cally a circa
EUR 15 million payment that was due to Polish bondholders on 18 November 2013 and a circa EUR 17 million payment that was due to Israeli bondholders
on 31 December 2013, and therefore decided to withhold payment of principal and interest on maturities of all its bonds and any material payment to the
134
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 33 / note 34
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Company’s creditors. Furthermore, due to cross default clauses in the Group’s bank facilities the Group has entered into, the fi nancing banks can force
immediate repayments of the Group’s credit facilities (refer to note 16) which could result in foreclosure of the pledged property by the banks in cases of non-
recourse loans or, in cases of recourse loans, to execute the guaranties provided by the Group in favour of the banks. In the case of non-recourse loans, the
Group would be entitled to any excess proceeds over the amounts owed. In the case of recourse loans, please see below. The Group has been in discussions
with all affected banks and as of the date of approval of these fi nancial statements there were no early demand requests by any of the fi nancing banks. If
the debt restructuring is successful, the technical breach of cross default clauses in the Groups’ bank facilities would be remedied and the existing loan
agreements would continue in force.
On November 18, 2013, the Company has requested a restructuring plan (including suspension of payment proceedings) from the district court of Amsterdam,
which is the legal seat of the Parent Company.
The court approved the Company’s request and granted a six-month period for reaching an agreement with its creditors until the creditors meeting scheduled
for April 17, 2014. For the postponement of the creditor meeting refer to note 38(C). If until June 26, 2014 the Company will not reach an agreement the court
may switch to a liquidation procedure, which will probably cause signifi cant damages to the Company, its creditors and its shareholders.
Parallel to the court approval, the court appointed: a special manager (“administrator”), who works with the Company’s management and approves every
transaction, liability assumption or expense at the Company’s level and is suppose to recommend to the court to summon creditors meetings in order to vote
for approving the restructuring plan; and a supervisory judge who supervises the procedure. The recommendation of the administrator will be transferred to
the court only if he is convinced that the restructuring plan is fair and equal for all of the creditors. The administrator has appointed PwC Netherlands in order
to economically review the restructuring plan on his behalf.
Since the day of the Company’s announcement about applying to the district court of Amsterdam:
• The Company’s management is continuously cooperating with the trustees and representatives of the bondholders, and assisting them and their
representatives in every issue in order to promote the agreement and stay in the schedule set by the court.
• Negotiations are being held between all parties in order to agree on the restructuring plan details.
The main features of the proposed debt restructuring plan include:
To the shareholders
- The shareholders will be requested to provide capital/monetary infl ow to the Company by way of rights issuance of EUR 20 million as a pre-condition to
the coming into force of the debt restructuring plan. To the date of approval of these consolidated fi nancial statements this infl ow has not been formally
committed.
To creditors with non-collateral backed debts
- The group of creditors with non-collateral backed debts include the following lenders: bondholders in Israel, the bondholders in Poland and the banks with
fi xed charges with a recourse right.
- The principle of the request from creditors with bondholders is based on deferring principal payment dates (and unpaid accrued interest for November /
December 2013) against intensifying collaterals (negative pledge on all of the Company’s assets), the grant of compensation on interest payments and
participation in the equity upside (detailed below).
- The Company intends to put all efforts in order to avoid damages to the creditors, as practicable, from the situation that has resulted in the countries of
operations, and due to the change in the trends of capital markets.
- The Company and its offi cers will not be held responsible against any claims, except claims for violation of fi duciary duty, fraud or claims for which a
waiver cannot be granted under the law.
Israeli bondholders and the institutional bondholders in Poland
Principal payments - all principal payments of non-collateral backed debts (bonds (series A) bonds (series B) and bonds held by institutional investors in
Poland including unpaid interest due November/December 2013) for 2013, 2014 and 2015 in the amount of EUR 181.9 million (“the Deferred Debt”) will be
deferred to 2016, 2017 and 2018 (at the same date and month of each series).
Interest payments – after the arrangement, interest payments will be made when due.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
135
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Interest rate – effective January 1, 2014, an additional 1.5% interest will be paid (for the deferred payments (principal and interest until the end of 2013) in
addition to compensation in interest to be received from shares granted as detailed in the equity upside section below.
Early repayment – the Company will be entitled to make early repayments at any time of any debt balance which is according to the adjusted Par value price
of the bonds but it must make an early repayment upon realization or refi nancing of assets in a scope of 75% of the net cash fl ows that will be received by the
Company. Upon making the early repayment, the debt in respect of the cumulative interest will be paid and thereafter the next principal payments. Out of the
amount paid as an early repayment, 21.1% will be paid for bonds (series A), 70.7% will be paid for bonds (series B) and 8.2% will be paid for Polish bonds.
(Each will be paid according to its relative share in the deferred debt (“Deferred Debt Ratio”)).
Payment Deferral – This would occur in the event that in two years from the arrangement date, if the Company made early repayments of over 50% of the
deferred debt (such that the balance of bonds (series A) will be lower than NIS 170 million (EUR 36 million) par value and the balance of bonds (series B) will
be lower than NIS 250 million (EUR 52 million) par value), then the remaining deferred principal payments will be deferred in an additional year (at the same
date and month of each series).
Equity Upside – to enable the creditors to enjoy an ‘Equity Upside’ feature, the Company will allocate, post the completion of the right issuance, to the Deferred
Debt holders shares representing 13.5% of the Company’s shares (2.85% to series A holders, 9.54% to series B holders and 1.11% to the Polish holders) at
no consideration.
Payment to the holders of the Unsecured Debt – Following the removal of the suspension of payments order, the Company shall pay to the holders of the
Deferred Debt holders an amount of EUR 10.5 million, on account of 2014 interest payments.
Restriction of Payments to shareholders – the Company undertakes that as long as the deferred debt balance is not paid in full, certain limitations on
distribution of dividends will apply.
Collaterals - a negative pledge on all of the Company’s assets meaning that the Company cannot pledge an unpledged asset, in favor of other lenders. The
asset value included in the negative pledge according to their book value (net of debt, if any) as of December 31, 2013 is EUR 381 million (assets less liabilities
that are not bonds, including accrued interest).
Instructions on unpledged assets
• The Company may not take new loans against pledging existing unpledged assets and/or non collateral loans. Despite these restrictions, the Company may
obtain fi nancing against a pledge and/or existing assets and/or non collateral loans provided that 75% of the fi nancing will be used for early repayment.
• The Company may pledge lands, fi rst in priority, for a construction loan in favor of a bank, with an loan to cost ratio that will not fall below 60%.
Instructions on pledged assets
• The Company may obtain refi nancing or new loans with respect to each of the pledged assets provided that at least 75% of the extra fi nancing in respect of
that asset will be used for early repayment.
• Upon selling an asset of the pledged assets, 75% of the net consideration received by the Company from selling the asset (after debt repayment to the
bank, selling expenses and tax, if required) will be used for early repayment of the Unsecured Debt, to be allocated among the holders of Unsecured Debt in
accordance with the Deferred Debt Ratio.
• The Company will be allowed to execute actual investments only if the Company’s cash reserves contain an amount equal to administrative expenses
and interest payments for the Unsecured Debt for a six-month period (for this purpose also receivables with a high probability of being collected in the
subsequent six-month period will be taken in account for the required minimal cash reserve).
• The Company may obtain new loans to purchase/build new assets provided that the loans will be of non-recourse type and the equity component in the
purchase/build will not exceed 40%.
To banks with Recourse right
Debt balance to banks: the debt balance in the Company’s books with a right of recourse as of December 31, 2013 amounts to EUR 48 million against assets
valued at EUR 83 million which are pledged, with fi rst priority, to the banks.
136
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 34
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Recourse to the Company: deferring recourse right for four years
If the Company fails to meet its current payments and a debt balance to the banks remains after asset realization, the banks may demand the debt remaining
shortfall only after four years from the arrangement date. The recourse right will be at the debt level before asset realization net of the highest between the
received consideration from asset realization and 90% of the value of an external appraiser (to be agreed upon by the parties) in a time period of not more than
three months before the realization date.
Debt restructuring plan (“the restructuring plan”)
The creditors have the right to accept or refuse the above mentioned features of the debt restructuring plan. In general, in order to approve the restructuring
plan, a simple majority of creditors allowed to vote (both by number of attendees in the actual voting and in the amount of the claim) is required. Creditors
allowed to vote are comprised of bondholders and lenders at the Company’s level, as well as creditors having recourse right to the Company (for their
unsecured claim). A refusal will most probably lead to the liquidation of the Company.
The company believes that the proposed agreement is the optimal for allowing the Company to serve its debt for its creditors, and the Company’s management
is doing its best in order to reach an agreement within the time frame that was granted by the court.
Accordingly, management believes that, should the debt restructuring plan be accepted in the manner suggested by the Company, it would be able to retain
signifi cant value for its shareholders (as shown in the table below) and will be able to repay its creditors in full. By contrast, the Board of Directors of the
Company and management are convinced that a forced liquidation (which will occur, should the creditors reject the restructuring plan) will most probably
cause shareholders and creditors to incur signifi cant losses. The following table presents the Group’s assets disposal plan until 2018 (net cash fl ows (being
mainly net of asset specifi c borrowings and taxes), in millions of EUR):
Property name
Total
H1-2014
H2-2014
H1-2015
H2-2015
H1-2016
H2-2016
H1-2017
H2-2017
H1-2018
Riga Plaza (Diksna)
Koregaon Park Plaza*
Torun´ Plaza
Bangalore
Suwałki Plaza
Casa Radio - turbines**
Leszno Plaza
Kragujevac Plaza
Ias¸i Plaza
Łódz´ (Residential)
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza
Kielce Plaza
Hunedoara Plaza
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka)
Cina (Romania)
Łódz´ Plaza
Timis¸oara Plaza
Casa Radio - project
Belgrade Plaza (MUP)
21.5
18.1
49.8
25.9
10.6
5.0
1.0
15.9
8.0
6.0
4.0
3.0
1.5
30.7
7.5
31.3
26.1
171.1
53.6
21.5
12.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.6
49.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12.9
10.6
5.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
15.9
8.0
6.0
4.0
3.0
1.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
490.6
34
55.4
29.5
51.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30.7
7.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
31.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
171.1
53.6
38.2
31.3
26.1
224.7
* For the sale of Koregaon park, refer to note 34 (G).
** For the sale of turbines, resulting in different amount of cash infl ow, refer to note 38 (B).
The Company’s website (www.plazacenters.com) includes non-audited information related to the debt restructuring.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
137
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
B. Update and impairment in respect of the Bangalore and Chennai projects
Bangalore
In March 2008, Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd. (“EPI”), a 47.5% joint venture company held together with EI, entered into an amended and
reinstated share subscription and framework agreement (the “Amended Framework Agreement”), with a local third party (the “Partner”) and a wholly
owned Indian subsidiary of EPI which was designated for this purpose (“SPV”), to acquire, through the SPV, up to 440 acres of land in Bangalore, India (the
“Project”) in certain phases as set forth in the Amended Framework Agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the Partner has surrendered land transfer deeds in
favour of the SPV to a trustee nominated by the parties for approximately 54 acres for a total aggregate consideration of approximately INR 2,843 million (EUR
40 million), and upon the actual transfer of the title, the Partner will be entitled to receive 50% of the shareholdings in the SPV. The abovementioned amounts
are presented in the statement of fi nancial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 as equity accounted investees.
In addition, the SPV paid to the Partner advances of approximately INR 2,536 million (EUR 35 million) on account of future acquisitions by the SPV of a further
51.6 acres. Such amount is presented in the statement of fi nancial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 as part of the equity accounted investees (refer
to note 14).
On July 22, 2010, EPI, the SPV and the Partner signed a new framework agreement which, subject to certain conditions (which, as of December 31, 2013,
have not been satisfi ed yet), is supposed to replace the Amended Framework Agreement (the “New Framework Agreement”).
The New Framework Agreement established new commercial understandings between the parties thereto, pertaining, inter alia, to the joint development of
the Project and its magnitude and fi nancing, the commercial relationships and working methods between the parties and the distribution mechanism of the
revenues from the Project. In accordance with the New Framework Agreement, the following commercial terms have been, inter alia, agreed between the
parties:
• EPI will remain the holder of 100% of the shareholdings and the voting rights in the SPV.
• The scope of the new project will be decreased to approximately 165 acres instead of the original 440 acres.
• The Partner undertakes to complete the acquisitions of the additional land and/or the development rights therein in order to obtain the ownership and/or
the development rights over all 165 acres.
• Neither EPI nor the SPV will be required to pay any additional amounts in respect of the land acquisitions or with respect to the Project and its
development.
• The Project will be re-designed as an exclusive residential project.
• The Project will be executed jointly by the Partner and the SPV. The Partner (or any of its affi liates) will also serve as the general contractor and marketing
manager of the project. Under the New Framework Agreement, the Partner is also committed to maximum sale prices, minimum construction costs
threshold and a detailed timeline and budget with respect to the development of the project
Under the New Framework Agreement, EPI will receive distributions (following a certain 3+6 months reserve mechanism to enable the Partner to utilize a
portion of the proceeds for construction costs and expenses) of approximately 70% of the net proceeds from the Project (including the proceeds from any sale
by the Partner or any transaction with respect to the original land which does not form part of the said 165 acres), until such time that EPI’s investment in the
amount of INR 5,780 million (approximately EUR 80 million) (“EPI’s Investment”) plus an Internal Return Rate of 20% per annum calculated from September
30, 2009 (“IRR”) is paid to the SPV on behalf of EPI) (the “Discharge Date”).
Following the Discharge Date, EPI will not be entitled to receive any additional profi ts from the Project and it will transfer to the Partner the entire
shareholdings in the SPV for no consideration. In addition, the Partner has a call option, subject to applicable law and regulations, to acquire the entire
shareholdings of the SPV, at any time, in consideration for EPI’s Investment plus an IRR of 20% per annum calculated on the relevant date of acquisition.
The New Framework Agreement will enter into full force and effect upon execution of certain ancillary agreements described therein as well as satisfaction of
certain other conditions; however, EPI, the SPV and the Partner are actually pursuing the Project itself in accordance with the New Framework Agreement.
In January 2011, the Partner has submitted the development plans pertaining to approximately 49 plus 35 acres included in the scope of the new project
of 165 acres to the local planning authority, the Bangalore Development Authority (“BDA”). In October 2011, the BDA had notifi ed the Partner that the
development plans cannot be considered due to a future eminent domain plan.
In January 2012, the Partner applied to the State High Court, requesting to issue a court order directing the BDA to consider the development plans. In March
2012, the court awarded a judgment pertaining to approximately 49 acres, ordering the BDA to consider the development plans related to the said 49 acres
(“Development Plan”), while ignoring any future eminent domain plan that may be considered by the state authorities.
138
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 34
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
In December 2012, the BDA decided to submit the Development Plan pertaining to the aforementioned 49 acres to the Sensitive Zone Sub-Committee of the
BDA and in January 2013, the Sensitive Zone Sub-Committee of the BDA granted its approval to the aforementioned Development Plan. In May 2013, the court
awarded a judgment pertaining to the additional 35 acres, ordering the BDA to consider the development plans related to the said 35 acres as well.
As for December 31, 2013 due to the uncertainly of the Group ability to develop the project in the foreseeable future the Group measured the net realizable
value of the project according to the comparable model. As a result the Group recorded EUR 31 million write down expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.
Chennai
In December 2007 EPI, executed agreements for the establishment of a special purpose vehicle (“Chennai Project SPV”) together with one of the leading real
estate developers in Chennai (in this section, the “Local Partner”). Subject to the fulfi lment of certain conditions, the Chennai Project SPV undertook to acquire
the ownership and development rights in and up to 135 acres of land situated in the Sipcot Hi-Tech Park in the Siruseri District of Chennai, India.
Under these agreements, EPI is to hold 80% of the equity and voting rights in the Chennai Project SPV, while the Local Partner will retain the remaining 20%.
Under the agreement, EPI’s investment in the Chennai Project SPV will be a combination of investment in shares and compulsory convertible debentures. Due
to changes in market conditions, EPI and the Chennai Project SPV later decided to limit the extent of the project to 83.4 acres.
As at the date of these fi nancial statements, the Project SPV has completed the purchase of approximately 75 acres out of the total 83.4 acres for
consideration of approximately INR 2,367 million (approximately EUR 33 million). An additional amount of INR 564 million (approximately EUR 8 million) was
paid in advance in order to secure the acquisition of an additional 8.4 acres.
A shareholders agreement in respect of the management of the Chennai Project SPV provides for a fi ve member board of directors, four of whom are
appointed by EPI. The shareholders agreement also includes certain pre-emptive rights and restrictions on transferring securities in the Chennai Project SPV.
Profi t distributions declared by the Chennai Project SPV will be distributed in accordance with the shareholders’ proportionate shareholdings in that company,
subject to EPI’s entitlement to receive certain preferential payments out of the Chennai Project SPV’s cash fl ow on the terms specifi ed in the agreements.
The consummation of the agreements will be accomplished in stages, and is subject to the fulfi lment of certain regulatory requirements, as well as to the
Company’s satisfactory due diligence investigations, in respect of each stage.
However, EPI is currently negotiating certain changes in the project’s implementation plan and holding structure, which would require changes also in the
respective agreements. Among other things, should those changes be accepted, EPI shall not be required to advance more fi nancing to the project in addition
to the amounts mentioned above and shall hold all the issued and outstanding share capital of the SPV.
In furtherance of the foregoing, EPI is currently operating to secure a joint development agreement with local developer(s) for the development of the project
land, in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines.
As for December 31, 2013 due to the uncertainly of the Group ability to develop the project in the foreseeable future the Group recorded EUR 20.7 million write
down expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.
C. Additional impairments
For additional impairments information refer to notes 10 and 14.
D. Selling of joint venture in India
On May 29, 2013 the Company completed the sale of its 50% interests in an Investee which mainly held interests in an offi ce complex project located in Pune,
Maharashtra. The transaction valued the Investee collectively at EUR 33.4 million and, as a result, the Company has received gross cash proceeds of circa
EUR 16.7 million in line with its holding. The Company recorded a loss of EUR 5.1 million from the disposal, mainly due to reclassifi cation of foreign currency
translation reserve associated with the investment to the statement of profi t or loss in the amount of EUR 4.3 million.
E. Disposal of assets in the Czech Republic
On July 18th 2013 the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in a vehicle which holds the interest in the Prague 3 project (“Prague 3”), a logistics
and commercial center in the third district of Prague. Earlier this year, the Company completed its successful application to change the zoning use of Prague 3
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
139
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
to a residential scheme. The transaction values the asset at circa EUR 11 million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other adjustments to the
statement of fi nancial position, the Company has received cash proceeds of net EUR 7.6 million. The Company has disposed the Prague 3 investment property
asset, and has recorded a loss from fair value adjustment of EUR 4.2 million, included in other expenses in the statement of profi t or loss.
In addition, in July 2013 the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in a vehicle which held the interest in another plot of land in Prague. The
transaction values the asset at circa EUR 1.9 million and, as a result, further to liability to third parties, the Company has received cash proceeds of EUR 1.3
million. The Company has accounted for a EUR 3.5 million write down of this trading property in the second quarter of 2013 presented within write down of
trading properties in the statement of profi t or loss. The Company recorded a loss of EUR 0.3 million as a result of this disposal.
F. Disposal of equity accounted investees Ercorner and Uj Údvar in Hungary
On October 31, 2013 the Consortium of shareholders of Dream Island, in which the Company indirectly holds a 43.5% stake, has completed the sale of its
Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa EUR 17 million. The Consortium comprises an 87% holding interest of Ercorner, the 50:50
joint venture between the Company and a Hungarian commercial bank, as well as other small holders.
The proceeds of the transaction were used by the Consortium to repay a proportion of the securitized related bank debt held against the asset.
In addition to the above, in December 2013 the consortium of shareholders of Új Udvar, in which the Company indirectly holds a 35% stake, has completed
the sale of its Új Udvar project holding to a private investor for a consideration of EUR 2.4 million. The Company has accounted for a EUR 1.9 million write
down of this investee in the fourth quarter of 2013 presented within write down of equity accounted investees in the statement of profi t or loss. The Company
recorded as a result of this transaction a loss of EUR 0.1 million.
G. Agreement to sell Indian shopping mall
On November 14, 2013 the Company, announced that it has reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail and entertainment located in Pune,
India, subject to the satisfaction of certain closing conditions. The transaction values the asset at EUR 40.3 million, the asset’s current carrying amount.
Therefore no signifi cant gain or loss is expected on the transaction besides the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve to be transferred to the profi t or loss
from Other Comprehensive Income.
Following the repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, the Company will receive aggregate gross cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling circa EUR 18.
Subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions, including consent from the fi nancing bank, the Company expects to collect circa EUR 12 million until the end of
2014 (EUR 2.3 million were already collected as of the day of statement of fi nancial position) and the remaining EUR 6 million consideration is expected to be
collected in 2015 and 2016.
In respect of the fi re which occurred in this shopping center refer to note 34 (J) below.
H. Dissolving of an equity accounting investee in the US
In March 2013, the Company’s 50% joint arrangement investee Elbit Plaza USA (“EPUS”) was liquidated. As part of the liquidation procedure, the Company
received an amount of USD 42 million (EUR 32 million), being its part in the remaining cash in EPUS. The dissolving did not result in any material effect on
the statement of profi t or loss of the Company.
I. Treasury bond held
As of December 31, 2013, the Company hold through it’s wholly owned subsidiary 15.9 million NIS par value bonds in series B debentures (adjusted par value
of NIS 18.6 million (EUR 3.9 million).
J. Fire in the Company’s shopping center in India
In June 2012 a fi re event occurred at the Company’s shopping center in Pune, India. The fi re required a temporary close-down of the shopping center, but did
not consume the entire shopping center. In respect of impairments performed refer to note 11. The Company was refunded in July 2013 in the amount of a
EUR 7 million damage insurance claim relating to the fi re. In respect of covering the loss of income insurance claim, the Company is expected to collect circa
EUR 2.5 million from this claim which has not been accrued, and is treated as a contingent asset.
140
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 34
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
K. Transaction during 2012 in the United States
On January 10, 2012 EDT, a wholly owned subsidiary of EPN Group, the Company’s joint US subsidiary (held indirectly 22.69% by the Company through
EPUS), reached an agreement to sell 47 of its 49 US-based shopping centers in a transaction totalling USD 1.43 billion (EUR 1.13 billion). The closing of this
transaction occurred on June 20, 2012.
The centers were acquired by BRE DDR Retail Holdings LLC, a joint venture between Blackstone Real Estate Advisors VII L.P. (“Blackstone Real Estate”) and
DDR. Of the transaction value of USD 1.43 billion, a total of USD 934 million (EUR 736 million) was paid by way of assumption of the property level debt or
repaid by EPN Group. In addition, all excess cash within EDT, which was circa USD 30 million (EUR 24 million), was retained by the vendor.
Following the sale of the 47 properties, EPN Group held two properties located in the United States that were valued at approximately USD 42 million (EUR 33
million) with total non-recourse secured debt of approximately USD 13 million (EUR 11 million). In July 2012, EPN Group sold its two remaining assets in the
US for a total aggregate asset value of USD 42 million (EUR 33 million).
Non-recourse secured debt of approximately USD 13 million (EUR 11 million) was also assumed in the abovementioned transactions. As the Company
indirectly held 22.69% of these US assets, the Company share in the net proceeds totaled EUR 5 million, with no realized gain or loss resulting.
The table below is a summary of the 2012 transaction results of selling the 47 properties:
Company’s part in transaction costs
Foreign currency translation reserve reclassified to consolidate statement of profit or loss
Realized gain on sale of investment properties
L. 2012 Disposals of trading property plots in Bulgaria and Hungary
€ 000’
(9,339)
9,730
391
In July 2012 the Company sold its stake (51%) in a plot of land located in Sofi a, Bulgaria for a total net consideration of EUR 0.1 million. In addition, certain
bank loans and other liabilities in a total amount of EUR 13 million were assumed by the buyer and is not included in the Company’s consolidated fi nancial
statements starting the third quarter of 2012. No material gain or loss was recorded as a result of this transaction.
In October 2012 the Company, through its jointly held investee in Hungary, disposed of a plot of land adjacent to its Dream Island property plot in Budapest
Hungary. As part of the transaction, a loan in the amount of EUR 5.9 (Company’s share) was assigned to the buyer, and the plot with a total book value of
EUR 4.5 million was disposed of. The Investee recorded as a result of this transaction a gain of EUR 1.4 million in 2012, included as part of share in results of
equity accounted investees.
M. Fantasy Park settlement
The Company‘s subsidiary, Fantasy Park Sp. z o.o. (“Fantasy Park”) was involved in several legal proceedings with Klépierre S.A subsidiaries (“Klépierre”) in
Poland in connection with certain terms of the lease agreements signed between the parties, including certain amendments thereto which were agreed at a
later stage (“Lease”).
In March 2013 Fantasy Park reached a settlement , according to which Fantasy Park paid Klépierre EUR 0.5 million and vacated the premises, and by that
Fantasy Park settled all the pending disputes, as well as any other disputes that may arise in the future in connection with the Lease. The Fantasy Park
settlement generated a gain of EUR 0.2 million, included as other income in profi t or loss.
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
141
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
NOTE 35 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related party transactions
Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Details of transactions between
the Group and other related parties are disclosed below.
The Company has six directors. The annual remuneration of the directors in 2013 amounted to EUR 0.9 million (2012 – EUR 0.9 million) and the annual share
based payments expenses amounted to EUR 0.1 million (2012- EUR 0.5 million). There was no change in the number of Company options granted to key
personnel in 2013. There are no other benefi ts granted to directors. Information about related party balances as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 refer to note 18.
Trading transactions
During the year, Group entities had the following trading transactions with related parties that are not members of the Group:
Income
Interest on balances with EI
Costs and expenses
Recharges - EI and EUL
Executive director1
Aviation services - Jet Link2
Project management provision and charges -Control Centers group2
For the year ended
For the year ended
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2012
€’000
139
233
222
-
327
€’000
213
548
240
61
1,381
1 The Executive Director, who is also the former controlling shareholder of the ultimate parent company, is receiving an annual salary of USD 300 thousand.
2 Jet Link Ltd. and Control Centers (refer to note 33 a(1) and a(2)) are companies owned by the former ultimate shareholder of the Company. Control Centers group costs were capitalized
to the relevant trading property.
142
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 35 / note 36
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 36 - OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Group comprises the following main reportable geographical segments: CEE, India and the US (starting June 30, 2010). None of the Group’s tenants is
accounting for more than 10% of the total revenue. Also, no revenue is derived in the Netherlands, where the Company is domiciled. The US segment was
discontinued with effect from December 31, 2012. In presenting information on the basis of geographical segments, segment revenue is based on the revenue
resulted from either the selling or operating of assets geographically located in the relevant segment. Refer to note 11 for further detail by property on carrying
amounts of Trading Properties and note 16 for detail on project secured bank loans by property.
Year ended December 31, 2013
Total revenues1
Central & Eastern Europe
€’000
26,340
India
€’000
683
Total
€’000
27,023
Operating loss by segment
(92,684)
(20,756)
(113,440)
Net fi nance costs
Other expenses, net
Share in results of equity-accounted investees
(5,858)
(6,402)
1,348
(4,054)
(4,653)
(56,813)
(9,912)
(11,055)
(55,465)
Reportable segment loss before tax2
(103,596)
(86,276)
(189,872)
Less - unallocated general and administrative expenses (Dutch corporate level costs).
Discontinued operations US (refer to note 37)
Unallocated other expenses (Dutch corporate level)
Unallocated fi nance costs (Dutch corporate level- mainly debentures fi nance cost)
Loss before income taxes
Tax benefi t
Loss for the period
Assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2013
Total segment assets3
Unallocated assets (Mainly Cash and other fi nancial instruments held of Dutch level)
480,196
68,829
Total assets
Segment liabilities
Unallocated liabilities (Mainly debentures)
Total liabilities
175,302
26,715
1 Out of which EUR 16.6 million is attributed to Poland.
2 Central Eastern Europe – including EUR 109 million of impairments. India – including EUR 76 million of impairments.
3 Refer to note 11 for the breakdown of Trading Property assets by location.
(5,090)
65
-
(29,432)
(224,329)
6,256
(218,073)
549,025
36,741
585,766
202,017
173,421
375,438
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
143
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Year ended December 31, 2012 (Restated)
Total revenues1
Central & Eastern Europe
€’000
28,373
India
€’000
1,650
Operating loss by segment2
(60,732)
(16,622)
Net fi nance costs
Other income, net
Share in profi t of equity-accounted investees
(10,345)
1,346
1,348
(3,039)
7,611
127
Reportable segment loss before tax
(68,383)
(11,923)
Less - unallocated general and administrative expenses (Dutch corporate level)
Discontinued operations US (refer to note 37)
Unallocated other expenses (Dutch corporate level)
Unallocated fi nance costs (Dutch corporate level)
Loss before income taxes
Tax benefi t
Loss for the period
Assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2012
Total segment assets
Unallocated assets (Mainly Dutch level fi nancial instruments)
630,851
152,943
Total assets
Segment liabilities
Unallocated liabilities (Mainly debentures)
Total liabilities
205,530
37,765
1 Out of which EUR 19.7 million is attributed to Poland.
2 Central Eastern Europe – including EUR 68.1 million of impairments. India – including EUR 15.6 million of impairments.
3 Refer to note 11 for the breakdown of Trading Property assets by location.
Total
€’000
30,023
(77,354)
(13,384)
8,957
1,475
(80,306)
(5,438)
(2,044)
(1,109)
(3,857)
(92,755)
6,592
(86,163)
783,794
102,024
885,818
243,295
199,591
442,886
144
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 36 / note 37
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 37 – DISCONTINUED OPERATION
Following the disposal of US assets (refer to note 34(L)) the Company discontinued its US activity. The results are the results of the equity accounted investee EPUS.
Results for discontinued operation
Revenues
Expenses1
Results from operating activity
Tax benefi t
Results from operating activities, net of tax
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
Profi t (loss) for the year from discontinued operation
Earnings per share
2013
€’000
2012 Revised
€’000
-
-
-
-
65
65
13,907
(16,942)
(3,035)
600
(2,435)
391
(2,044)
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO)
(0.00)
(0.01)
1 2012 - Including reduction in value of investment property in the amount of EUR 2,254 thousand.
Below is the information on allocation of profi t between the owners of the Company and non-controlling interests:
Loss for the year from continuing operations
Attributable to owners of the Company
Attributable to non-controlling interests
Profi t (loss) for the year from discontinued operations
Attributable to owners of the Company
Attributable to non-controlling interests
Cash fl ow from (used in) discontinued operation
Net cash from (used in) operating activities
Net cash from investing activities
Net cash fl ow for the year
Effect of disposal on the 2012 fi nancial position of the investee EPUS
Investment property
Interest bearing loan from banks
Trade and other payables
2013
€’000
-
-
-
2013
€’000
65
65
-
2013
€’000
(65)
-
(65)
2012 Revised
€’000
(84,119)
(84,119)
-
2012 Revised
€’000
(2,044)
(2,044)
-
2012
€’000
2,044
63,885
65,929
2012
€’000
(263,047)
161,560
14,064
(87,423)
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
145
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Reclassifi cation in statement of comprehensive income due to discontinued operation
In 2012 the movement is attributable to creation of translation reserve (EUR 2.8 million), as well as reclassifi cation of amounts from the translation reserve to
profi t or loss (EUR 9.7 million).
NOTE 38 – EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
A. Selling of airplane
On February 25, 2014 the Company disposed the airplane for a total consideration of USD 1.9 million (EUR 1.4 million). The proceeds from the disposal were
used to repay the bank facility taken for the purchase of the airplane, and the Company currently negotiates with the fi nancing bank the conditions to be set for the
repayment of the remaining outstanding bank loan (circa EUR 1 million).
B. Sale of turbines
In March 2014 the Casa Radio project company disposed of the turbines held in respect of the Casa Radio project (refer also to note 11) for a total net
consideration of EUR 2.6 million.
C. Postponement of creditors meeting to vote on the restructuring plan
On 11 March 2014, the Company obtained from the Dutch Court a postponement of the dates for the voting on the proposed plan, due to technicalities involved
with the completion of the arrangement.
The Dutch Court set 26 June 2014 as the date for voting on the proposed restructuring plan, as to be amended. The Company does not expect this postponement
to have any effect on its ability to conclude the restructuring plan to the satisfaction of both its creditors and shareholders.
146
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 38 / note 39
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
NOTE 39 - LIST OF GROUP ENTITIES
As of December 31, 2013, the Company owns the following companies (all are 100% held subsidiaries at the end of the reporting period
presented unless otherwise indicated):
HUNGARY
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Plaza Centers Establishment B.V.
Kerepesi 5 Irodaépület Ingatlanfejleszto˝ Kft.
Inactive
Holder of land usage rights
Plaza House Ingatlanfejlesztési Kft.
HOM Ingatlanfejlesztési és Vezetési Kft.
Szombathely 2002 Ingatlanhasznosító és Vagyonkezelo˝ Kft.
Tatabánya Plaza Ingatlanfejlesztési Kft.
Offi ce building
Management company
Inacitve
Inacitve
100% held by Plaza Centers Establishment B.V.
Aréna Plaza extension project
David House
SLOVAKIA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
REMARKS
Kielce Plaza project
Leszno Plaza project
Łódz´ (Residential) project
Białystok Plaza project
Radom Plaza project
Łódz´ Plaza project
O2 Fitness Club project
Directly wholly owned
Plaza Centers Slovak Republic S.R.O.
POLAND
Directly wholly owned
Kielce Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Leszno Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Łódz´ Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Olsztyn Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Płock Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Włocławek Plaza Sp. z o.o.
O2 Fitness Club Sp. z o.o.
Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
EDMC Sp. z o.o.
Plaza Centers (Poland) Sp. z o.o.
Bytom Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Bielsko-Biała Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Bydgoszcz Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Chorzów Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Gdan´sk Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Gliwice Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Gorzów Wielkopolski Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Jelenia Góra Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Katowice Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Legnica Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Opole Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Radom Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Rzeszów Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Szczecin Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Tarnów Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Torun´ Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Tychy Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Inactive
ACTIVITY
Shopping center project
Owns plot of land
Owns plot of land
Owns plot of land
Owns plot of land
Mixed-use project
Entertainment
Holding company
Management company
Management company
Inactive
Inacitve
Inacitve
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
147
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
Indirectly or jointly owned
Legnica Plaza Spółka z ograniczona˛
odpowiedzialnos´cia˛ S.K.A.
Suwałki Plaza Sp.z.o.o.
Operating shopping center
Operating shopping center
Zgorzelec Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Operating shopping center
Lublin Or Sp. z o.o.
EDP Plaza Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Suwałki Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Torun´ Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Zgorzelec Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Bytom Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Łódz´ Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Poznan´ Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Warszawa Sp. z o.o.
Fantasy Park Investments Sp. z o.o.
Inactive
Inactive
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inacitve
100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
Torun´ Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
Suwałki Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
Zgorzelec Plaza project
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V. with Israeli-based partner
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V. with Israeli-based partner
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
LATVIA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Indirectly or jointly owned
Diksna SIA
Operating shopping center
Fantasy Park Latvia SIA
Entertainment
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by JV partner
Riga Plaza project
100% held by Mulan B.V.
ROMANIA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Dâmbovit¸a Centers Holding B.V.
Plaza Bas B.V.
S.C. Elite Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Green Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. North Eastern Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. North West Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. North Gate Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Eastern Gate Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. South Gate Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Mountain Gate Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Palazzo Ducale S.R.L.
S.C. Plaza Centers Management Romania S.R.L.
S.C. Central Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. White Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Blue Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Golden Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. West Gate Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. South Eastern Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. South West Plaza S.R.L.
S.C. Plaza Operating Management S.R.L.
Indirectly or jointly owned
S.C. Dâmbovit¸a Center S.R.L.
Adams Invest S.R.L.
Holding company
Holding company
Shopping center project
Shopping center project
Shopping center project
Shopping center project
Shopping center project
Real estate project
Shopping center project
Shopping center project
Offi ce building
Management company
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Mixed-use project
Residential project
50.1% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
Timis¸oara Plaza project
Ias¸i Plaza project
Constant¸a Plaza project
Hunedoara Plaza project
Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc) project
Cina project
Slatina Plaza project
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza project
Palazzo Ducale
75% held by Dâmbovit¸a Centers Holding B.V.
Casa Radio project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Valley View project
148
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 39
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Colorado Invest S.R.L.
Residential project
Malibu Invest S.R.L.
Residential project
Spring Invest S.R.L.
Offi ce project
Sunny Invest S.R.L.
Residential project
Primavera Invest S.R.L.
Offi ce project
Bas Developement S.R.L.
Residential project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Pine Tree project
Equity accounted investee - 25% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
75% held by partner
Fountain Park project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Primavera Tower Bras¸ov project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Green Land project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Primavera Tower Ploies¸ti project
Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Acacia Park project
MOLDOVA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
I.C.S. Plaza Centers Prodev S.R.L.
SERBIA
Directly wholly owned
Plaza Centers Holding B.V.
Plaza Centers (Estates) B.V.
Plaza Centers (Ventures) B.V.
Plaza Centers Logistic B.V.
S.S.S. Project Management B.V.
Plaza Centers Management D.O.O.
Indirectly or jointly owned
Sek D.O.O.
Accent D.O.O.
Telehold D.O.O.
CZECH REPUBLIC
Directly wholly owned
P4 Plaza S.R.O.
Plaza Centers Czech Republic S.R.O.
Inactive
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Management company
Operating shopping center
Shopping center project
Inactive
ACTIVITY
100% held by Plaza Centers Holding B.V.
Kragujevac Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers (Estates) B.V.
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) project
100% held by Plaza Centers (Ventures) B.V.
Belgrade Plaza (MUP) project
100% held by Plaza Centers Logistic B.V.
Kruševac Plaza project
100% held by S.S.S. Project Management B.V.
REMARKS
Leisure Group D.O.O.
Shopping center project
Orchid Group D.O.O.
Shopping center project
Operating shopping center
Management company
Liberec Plaza project
BULGARIA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Shumen Plaza EOOD
Plaza Centers Management Bulgaria EOOD
Shopping center project
Management company
Shumen Plaza project
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
149
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
plaza centers/notes to the
fi nan
GREECE
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Helios Plaza S.A.
Indirectly or jointly owned
Elbit Cochin Island Ltd.
CYPRUS – UKRAINE
Directly wholly owned
Tanoli Enterprises Ltd.
PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd.
Plaza Centers Ukraine Ltd.
Nourolet Enterprises Ltd.
Shopping center project
Pireas Plaza project
Inactive
ACTIVITY
40% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
REMARKS
Finance activity
Inactive
Management company / Inactive
Inactive
100% held by PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd.
100% held by PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd.
THE NETHERLANDS
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
P.L.A.Z.A B.V.
Holding company – Poland
Plaza Dâmbovit¸a Complex B.V.
Plaza Centers Enterprises B.V.
Mulan B.V. (Fantasy Park Enterprises B.V.)
Plaza Centers Administrations B.V.
Plaza Centers Connections B.V.
Plaza Centers Engagements B.V.
Plaza Centers Foundation B.V.
Plaza Centers Management B.V.
Holding company
Finance company
Holding company
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Mulan B.V.
Holds Hokus Pokus Rozrywka Sp. z o.o. jointly with
Plaza Centers N.V. (50%–50%)
100% held by Plaza Dâmbovit¸a Complex B.V.
Holds Fantasy Park subsidiaries in CEE
THE DUTCH ANTILLES
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Dreamland Entertainment N.V.
CYPRUS – INDIA
Directly wholly owned
PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
Indirectly or jointly owned
Permindo Ltd.
Inactive
ACTIVITY
Holding company
Holding company
Anuttam Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Operating shopping center
HOM India Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
Spiralco Holdings Ltd.
Rebeldora Ltd.
Rosesmart Ltd.
Xifi us Services Ltd.
Dezimark Ltd.
Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Polyvendo Ltd.
Management company
Holding company
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Holding company
Holding company
REMARKS
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
Holds 99.9% of Anuttam Developers Pvt. Ltd.
99.99% held by Permindo Ltd.
Koregaon Park Plaza project
99.99% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
Equity accounted investee - 47.5% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
150
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
consolidated
cial statements
note 39
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Elbit Plaza India Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
Kadavanthra Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Management company
Mixed-use project
Aayas Trade Services Pvt. Ltd.
Mixed-use project
Elbit India Architectural Services Ltd.
Inactive
99.99% held by Polyvendo Ltd.
80% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Chennai (SipCot) project
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Bangalore project (refer to note 34(B))
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Entities disposed or dissolved in 2012 and 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Indirectly or jointly owned
Elbit Plaza USA II LP (“EPUS 2”)
EPN REIT II
Elbit Plaza USA LP
Plaza USA LLC
Elbit USA LLC
Elbit USA II LLC
EPN GP LLC
Holding company
Inactive
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
Holding company
EDT Retail Trust (Australia)
Inactive
EDT U.S Trust INC. (US REIT I)
Holding company
EDT Fund LLC (US LLC)
EDT U.S Trust II INC. (US REIT II)
Inactive
Inactive
Elbit Plaza II USA LP
Holding company
EPN Investment Management LLC
Management company
EPN Fund GP LLC
EPN Real Estate Fund LP (Fund)
EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
EPN Holdings I LLC
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
EDT Retail Trust Management LLC (US MGR)
Holding company
EDT Retail Management Ltd. (Australia)
EPN Operations LLC
Management company / Inactive
Inactive
EPN REIT II LLC
Inactive
Equity accounted investee
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
Held 100% by EPUS II
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
21.64% held by Plaza USA LLC
12.18% held by Elbit USA LLC
9.47% held by Elbit USA II LLC
23.64% held by Plaza USA LLC
13.3% held by Elbit USA LLC
10.34% held by Elbit USA II LLC
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
100% held by EDT U.S Trust INC. (US REIT)
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
50% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
50% held by US-based partner
43.75% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
99.8% held by Israeli-based partner
0.2% held by EPN Fund GP LLC
100% held by EPN Real Estate Fund LP (Fund)
43.29% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
13.42% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
43.29% held by US-based partner
50% held by EPN Holdings I LLC
50% held by US-based partner
100% held by EDT Retail Trust Management LLC (US MGR)
43.29% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
13.42% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
43.29% held by US-based partner
45.375% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
9.25% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
45.375% held by US-based partner
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
151
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
L
A
I
C
N
A
N
I
F
HUNGARY
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Szeged 2002 Ingatlanhasznosító és Vagyonkezelo˝ Kft.
SBI Hungary Ingatlanforgalmazó és Építo˝ Kft.
Inactive
Shopping center
Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.
Holding company
Álom Sziget 2004 Ingatlanfejleszto˝ Kft.
Mixed-use project
DI Gaming Holding Ltd.
Álom Sziget Entertainment Zrt.
Álom Sziget Hungary Kaszinójáték Kft.
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Liquidated
50% held by Plasi Invest 2007 Ingatlanforgalmazó Kft.
50% held by Israeli-based partner
Új Udvar project
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Hungarian commercial bank
87% held by Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.
Dream Island project
87% held by Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.
49.99% held by DI Gaming Holding Ltd. – associate
100% held by Álom Sziget Entertainment Zrt.
CZECH REPUBLIC
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
Directly wholly owned
Praha Plaza S.R.O.
Plaza Housing S.R.O.
INDIA
P-One Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Logistic center
Owns plot of land
ACTIVITY
Real estate
Prague 3 project
Roztoky project
REMARKS
50% held by Spiralco Holdings Ltd.
50% held by Indian third party
Kharadi Plaza and Trivandrum Plaza projects
152
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S
Kragujevac Plaza, Serbia
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
153
N
O
I
T
A
M
R
O
F
N
I
L
A
N
O
I
T
I
D
D
A
Company’s
offi ces
Plaza Centers The Netherlands
Plaza Centers Serbia
Plaza Centers N.V.
Prins Hendrikkade 48-S
1012 AC Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 20 344 9560
Fax: +31 20 344 9561
E-mail: info@plazacenters.nl
www.plazacenters.com
Lazarevacˇka street no 1/5
11000 Senjak, Belgrade
Serbia
Phone: +381 11 715 1577
Fax: +381 11 715 1587
E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.rs
www.plazacenterserbia.rs
Plaza Centers Hungary
Plaza Centers Czech Republic
David House
Andrássy út 59.
1062 Budapest
Hungary
Phone: +36 1 462 7100
Fax: +36 1 462 7201
E-mail: info@plazacenters.com
Plaza Centers Poland
Marynarska Business Park
Ul. Tas´mowa 7,
02-677 Warsaw
Poland
Phone: +48 22 231 9900
Fax: +48 22 231 9901
E-mail: headoffi ce@plazacenters.pl
www.plazacenters.com/pl
Plaza Centers Romania
63-81 Calea Victoriei
Building I1, Entrance B2, District 1
010065 Bucharest
Romania
Phone: +40 21 315 4646
Fax: +40 21 314 5660
E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.ro
Palachova 1404
460 90 Liberec
Czech Republic
Phone: +420 485 104 110
E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.cz
www.plazacenters.cz
Plaza Centers Latvia
71 Mukusalas
LV-1004 Riga
Latvia
Phone: +371 67 633 734
Fax: +371 67 633 735
E-mail: offi ce.latvia@cbre.com
www.rigaplaza.lv
Plaza Centers India
Labban, 3rd Floor
40 Vittal Mallya Road
560 001 Bangalore
Phone: +91 80 4041 4444
Fax: +91 80 4041 4469
www.plazacenters.in
154
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
Advisors
Investor relations
FTI Consulting
Holborn Gate
26 Southampton Buildings
London WC2A 1PB
United Kingdom
www.fticonsulting.com
Financial advisors and stockbrokers
UBS Investment Bank
1 Finsbury Avenue
London EC2M 2PP
United Kingdom
www.ubs.com
Financial advisor
Spark Advisory Partners Limited
5 St John’s Lane
London EC1M 4BH
United Kingdom
www.sparkadvisorypartners.com
Principal auditor
KPMG Hungária Kft.
Váci út 99.
H-1139 Budapest
Hungary
www.kpmg.hu
Dutch statutory auditor
Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman Accountants N.V.
Mazars Tower – Delfl andlaan 1
PO Box 7266
1077 JG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.mazars.nl
Tax counsels in the Netherlands
Loyens & Loeff N.V.
Fred. Roeskestraat 100
1076 ED Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Web: www.loyensloeff.com
Corporate solicitors in the UK
Mayer Brown International LLP
201 Bishopsgate
London EC2M 3AF
United Kingdom
www.mayerbrown.com
Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP
Adelaide House
London Bridge
London EC4R 9HA
United Kingdom
www.blplaw.com
Corporate legal counsels in the Netherlands
Buren N.V.
World Trade Center, Tower A Level 10,
Strawinskylaan 1017
1077 XX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.burenlegal.com
Corporate legal counsel in Poland
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Warsaw Financial Center
ul. Emillii Plateer 53
Warsaw 00-113
Poland
www.weil.com/warsaw
Registrar
Capita Asset Services
The Registry
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent BR3 4TU
United Kingdom
www.capitaassetservices.com
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
155
156
PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013
Casa Radio, Romania
DESIGNED AND PRODUCED BY RESTYÁNSZKI DESIGN STUDIO
PLAZA CENTERS N.V.
Prins Hendrikkade 48-S
1012 AC Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 20 344 9560
Fax: +31 20 344 9561
E-mail: info@plazacenters.nl
www.plazacenters.com