Quarterlytics / Advertising Agencies / Platzer Fastigheter

Platzer Fastigheter

plaz · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker plaz
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry Advertising Agencies
Employees 201-500
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Platzer Fastigheter
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
3
1
0
2

T
R
O
P
E
R

L
A
U
N
N
A

S
R
E
T
N
E
C

A
Z
A
L
P

 
 
 
 
This annual report is not intended for Dutch

statutory fi ling purposes.

The Company is required to fi le an annual

report containing consolidated and Company 

fi nancial statements prepared in accordance

with the Netherlands Civil Code – such a report

will be submitted in due course to the Dutch

authorities and will be available for

shareholders’ inspection at the Company’s

offi ces in Amsterdam.

Contents

Overview
1  Who we are

2  2013 highlights

4  Our strategy

6  Feature developments

8  Debt restructuring plan

9  Competitive strengths

12  Our markets

13  Our portfolio at a glance

14  Development focus

16  Current portfolio

Business review
30  President and Chief Executive Offi cer’s statement

33  Operational review

40  Financial review

42  Valuation summary by Cushman and Wakefi eld

Management and governance
43  Management structure

44  Board of Directors and Senior management

46  Directors’ report

50  Corporate governance

57  Risk management

66  Remuneration report

68  Statement of the directors

Financial statements
70  Independent auditors’ report

71  Consolidated statement of fi nancial position

72  Consolidated statement of profi t or loss

73  Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

74  Consolidated statement of changes in equity

75  Consolidated statement of cash fl ows

77  Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements

Additional information
154   Company’s offi ces

155   Advisors

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Who we are

We are a leading Central and Eastern 
European property developer focusing on 
western-style shopping and entertainment 
centers, with a diversifi ed platform of 
operations in India.

Latvia

the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange in Israel and on the NASDAQ Global 

Select Market in the United States. (For more information visit 

www.elbitimaging.com.)

The Plaza Centers Group is a leading emerging markets developer 

The Group has been present in real estate development in emerging 

of shopping and entertainment centers, focusing on developing new 

markets for more than 18 years, initially pursuing shopping 

centers and, where there is signifi cant redevelopment potential, 

and entertainment center development projects in Hungary and 

redeveloping existing centers, in both capital cities and important 

subsequently expanding into Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, 

regional centers. The Group has been present in the Central and 

Latvia, Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and India. To date, the Group has 

Eastern Europe region (“CEE”) since 1996 and was the fi rst to 

developed and let 33 shopping and entertainment centers in the CEE 

develop western-style shopping and entertainment centers in 

region and India, of which 26 were sold with an aggregate gross 

Hungary. The Group has pioneered this concept throughout the 

value of circa €1.16 billion. 21 of these centers were acquired by 

CEE whilst building a strong track record of successfully developing, 

Klépierre, a leading player in the continental European shopping 

letting and selling shopping and entertainment centers. Since 2006, 

center property market, which owns circa 250 shopping centers and 

the Group has extended its area of operations beyond the CEE into 

manages circa 320 shopping centers in 13 countries in continental 

India. In 2012, Plaza identifi ed, with its joint venture partners, a 

Europe. Four additional shopping and entertainment centers were 

window of opportunity for investment in the US as result of the 

sold to the Dawnay Day Group, one of the UK’s leading institutional 

dislocation of the property market, specifi cally within the retail 

property investors at that time. One shopping center was sold 

sector. In 2010, taking advantage of its qualities and experience 

in 2007 to Active Asset Investment Management (“aAIM”), a UK 

in identifying opportunities, managing and exiting assets, gained 

commercial property investment group. The transaction had a 

over the years, the Group completed another signifi cant sale of 

completion value totaling approximately €387 million, representing 

49 US-based assets, mainly to a joint venture between Blackstone 

circa 20% of all real estate transactions completed in Hungary 

Real Estate and DDR Corp. in a transaction valued at 

in 2007.

USD 1.47 billion, which refl ects an ROE for the Group of 

nearly 50% in a period of little over 18 months. 

Since 1 November 2006, Plaza Centers N.V.’s shares have been 

traded on the main board of the London Stock Exchange under the 

Throughout 2013, Plaza made considerable operational 

ticker “PLAZ”. From 19 October 2007, Plaza Centers N.V.’s shares 

improvements across its portfolio. These are clearly refl ected in the 

are also traded on the main list of the Warsaw Stock Exchange under 

increase in occupancy levels from 89% at the end of 2012 to 93% 

the ticker “PLZ”, making it the fi rst property company to achieve this 

as at the reporting date. At the same time, Plaza continued to make 

dual listing.

good progress in the ongoing process of repositioning its business 

model, ensuring its continued focus on deleveraging the balance 

Due to the ongoing challenging market conditions and the 

sheet and reallocating capital, primarily through the disposal of 

upcoming debt maturities, on 18 November 2013 Plaza announced 

completed or non-core assets and reinvestment into its core yielding 

a debt restructuring plan in order to better structure its debts. 

assets. This was best illustrated by the €61 million raised during 

Throughout the restructuring process, the Company intends to 

the year through the sale of fi ve assets, the remaining proceeds 

continue its business activities as normal. The original date of the 

from the dissolution of the US holding entity and successful asset 

creditors’ voting, scheduled for 17 April 2014, has been postponed 

management initiatives at Torun´ Plaza, Suwałki Plaza, Kragujevac 

to 26 June 2014 due to technicalities involved in formally completing 

Plaza and Riga Plaza.

the arrangement. Despite this, Plaza remains confi dent that it should 

be able to conclude its restructuring process successfully in Q3 

The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Elbit Imaging Ltd. (“EI”), 

2014. For more details on the restructuring process, please refer to 

an Israeli public company whose shares are registered for trade on 

the Company’s website under Investor relations / Debt restructuring.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

1

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

2013 highlights

Continued improvement of operations, 
disposal of non-core assets and 
good progress with the restructuring 
process.

Total assets
2013: €586 million 

2012: €886 million restated

 2007 

2008 

2009 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

Net Asset Value (NAV)
2013: €274 million 

2012: €459 million

 2007 

2008 

2009 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

1500

1200

900

600

300

0

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

Consolidated cash position*
2013: €33.7 million 

2012: €66.6 million

 2007 

2008 

2009 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

Profi t (loss) after tax:
2013: €(218) million 

2012: €(86) million

 2007 

2008 

2010 

2011 

2009

2012

300

270

240

210

180

150

120

90

60

30

0

250

200

150

100

50

0

*  Including short-term and long-term liquid fi nancial instruments.

2013

2

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Asset and operational highlights

Financial highlights

•  In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily 

•  Reduction in total assets to €586 million (31 December 2012: 

holds interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra. 

€886 million restated – as a result of changes in the accounting 

The successful transaction valued assets owned by the vehicle 

presentation of joint venture Special Purpose Vehicles (‘SPVs’) (due 

collectively at €33.4 million and, as a result, Plaza received gross 

to changes in IFRS)), and primarily due to impairment of trading 

proceeds of circa €16.7 million.

properties and equity accounted investees as well as debt repayments.

-  Book value of the Company’s trading properties reduced 

•  In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its 

by 19% over the year, or by €117 million, primarily due to 

stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project 

impairments recorded.

(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third 

district of Prague. The transaction valued the asset at circa €11.1 

•  Rental income slightly increased to €23.7 million (31 December 

million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other 

2012: €23.1 million), due to the improvement in the performance 

balance sheet adjustments, Plaza received net proceeds of circa 

of the CEE shopping centers. The rental income performance 

€7.6 million in cash.

would have been even stronger, had there not been a loss of 

income caused by a fi re incident in India.

•  On 31 October 2013, a consortium of shareholders of Dream 

Island, in which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale 

•  Net Asset Value decreased by 40% to €274 million (31 December 

of its Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State 

2012: €459 million) primarily as a result of impairment of assets, 

for circa €16.5 million (HUF 5 billion). The proceeds of the 

mainly in Serbia, Romania and India.

transaction were used by the Consortium to repay a proportion 

-  Net Asset Value per share of £0.79 (31 December 2012: £1.26), 

of the securitised related bank debt held against the asset. As 

a decline of 37%, attributable mainly to the abovementioned 

a result of a previous non-cash, market driven write-down, no 

impairments.

accounting loss was incurred.

•  Loss for the year of €218 million (31 December 2012: Loss of 

•  On 8 November 2013, the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary 

€86 million), stemming from a non-cash €186 million impairment 

signed a new €59.3 million investment loan with a consortium 

of trading properties, equity accounted investees, investment 

comprising two banks for its shopping and entertainment 

property and pre-payments (31 December 2012: €83.7 million 

center in Riga, Latvia. The new facility has duration of four 

of impairments), and an overall net fi nance cost of €39 million 

years and therefore substantially lengthens the duration of the 

compared to a net fi nance cost of €17 million in 2012. Impairment 

debt compared to the previous loan facility, which was due for 

of real estate assets in the fourth quarter of 2013 totalled circa 

repayment on 30 June 2014.

€43 million.

-  Basic and diluted loss per share of €0.73 (31 December 2012: 

•  On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an 

loss per share of €0.29).

agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and 

offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction 

•  Consolidated cash position at year end (including restricted 

of certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at 

bank deposits, short-term deposits and held for trading fi nancial 

circa €40 million, the asset’s current book value. Following the 

assets) of €33.7 million (31 December 2012: €65.8 million) and 

repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza expects to 

current cash position of circa €36 million (€7 million restricted).

generate aggregate cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling 

circa €18 million, before taxes and transaction costs, which 

•  Gearing increased to 64% (31 December 2012: 50%) as a result 

should be paid in instalments over the coming two years.

of impairment losses and fi nance costs incurred during the year.

•  Plaza’s 70% subsidiary reached an agreement in December 2013 

Key highlights since the period end

to sell its 50% equity stake (together with the other 50% joint 

venture partner) in the Új Udvar shopping mall in Budapest, 

Hungary. As a result of the transaction, proceeds of €2.35 million 

in cash were received by Plaza for its share in the asset.

•  Improved occupancy levels achieved across the Company’s 

existing shopping and entertainment centers in the CEE, with the 

overall portfolio occupancy rate increasing from 89% in 2012 to 

93% as at the reporting date.

Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring 

programme made on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good 

progress towards resolving its liquidity situation. The market 

prices of the Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the 

restructuring plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are 

moving forward.

The original date of the creditors’ voting, scheduled for 17 April 

2014, has been postponed to 26 June 2014 due to technicalities 

involved in formally completing the arrangement. For more details 

on the court decision, please refer to the Company’s website under 

Investor relations / Debt restructuring. Despite this, Plaza remains 

confi dent that it should be able to conclude its restructuring process 

successfully in Q3 2014.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

3

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Our 
strategy

Plaza will continue in its efforts 
to best position the Company against 
the ongoing economic and market 
uncertainty by striving to fi nd the 
optimal blend of progressing with 
limited and targeted development 
programme into the strongest 
economies of the CEE whilst reducing 
its levels of gearing. Plaza’s cautious 
but opportunistic approach is set to 
unlock signifi cant value on behalf of 
its shareholders.

4

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

plaza centers/overview

our strategy

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Develop

Develop modern, western-style shopping and entertainment centers 

in capital and regional cities, primarily in CEE and India.

Acquire

5  Continue to reallocate capital to pay debts following the sale of a 

number of completed and non-core assets and invest in the core 

yielding assets in our portfolio.

Development criteria

Selection of target countries

Acquire operating shopping centers that show signifi cant 

Our primary focus is on countries in emerging markets and we 

redevelopment or growth potential.

Flexibility

Depending on market yields, we either pre-sell or hold and manage 

our assets until the exit yields are suffi ciently attractive.

are currently present in CEE and India. In order to determine a 

favorable investment climate, we take into account country risk, 

GDP per capita and economic growth, ratio of retail sales per capita, 

political stability, sophistication of banking systems, land ownership 

restrictions, ease of obtaining building and operating permits, busi-

ness risks, existing competition and market saturation levels.

Maintain liquidity and debt management

Site evaluation

In order to resolve its liquidity situation, the Company has fi led 

We look to develop our fi rst project in the capital city of a new country, 

with the Dutch Court a restructuring plan proposed to its creditors. 

and thereafter in regional cities with a minimum catchment area of 

The restructuring plan proposes a deferral of the obligations of the 

50,000 residents. Site evaluation includes site area, catchment area, 

Company for a period of three to four years, or shorter if cash fl ow 

local zoning and town planning schemes, proximity to transportation 

permits, without requiring the bondholders to take a loss on the 

and vehicular routes and legal issues. A carefully structured, 

par value of their investments. During the restructuring process 

internally developed evaluation process is in place involving each of 

creditors are subject to a moratorium. 

the relevant disciplines (economics, engineering, marketing, etc.).

Plaza continues to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during 

the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the 

period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to 

64% in 2013.

Project development

Once we have approved a site, we manage its development from 

inception to completion, incorporating engineering, marketing, 

fi nancial and legal stages, designs, architects, market forecasts and 

Successful efforts to sign refi nancing agreements for constructing 

feasibility studies.

and/or investment loans and to extend loan duration were made in 2013. 

Emerging markets

Objectives

1  Concentrate on existing projects and target new development 

opportunities in the strongest countries in CEE, as well as in 

India, that have the potential to generate returns of 40% to 60% 

on equity invested.

Plaza Centers has a strong track record in developing real estate 

projects such as shopping and entertainment centers in emerging 

markets. The Group has been present in the CEE region since 1996, 

and was a pioneer in bringing western-style shopping malls to 

Hungary. The concept was continued throughout the CEE and is now 

being exported to India, whilst other development and investment 

2  Fund 60% to 75% of total project construction costs through 

opportunities in additional countries are being explored further. 

competitively priced bank fi nance.

3  Limited commencement of construction for projects meeting the 

two major criteria as follows: 

-  intensive demand from tenants 

-  backed by external bank fi nancing to ensure minimal equity 

investment.

The Company has had considerable success in capitalizing on the 

fantastic opportunities that emerging markets have offered. 

We carefully investigate the benefi ts and challenges inherent in 

every proposed project, adhering to our development criteria.

The Company is currently focusing its development efforts on 

4  Deliver considerable progress at the operational level of the 

Poland, Serbia, Romania and India. Plaza will continue to advance 

business through intensive asset management initiatives, such 

remaining projects within its land bank, through obtaining planning 

as attracting signifi cant anchor tenants to our assets.

consents and construction permits.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

5

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Feature 
developments

Since foundation, the Group has 
developed and let 32 shopping and 
entertainment centers in the CEE 
region and one in India of which 26 
were sold with an aggregate gross 
value of €1.16 billion, resulting in a 
gain of €360 million.

Plaza has averaged nearly two new shopping centers per 

year in the last 18 years and currently owns and manages 

seven shopping and entertainment centers. Improved 

occupancy levels achieved across the Company’s existing 

shopping and entertainment centers, with the overall 

portfolio occupancy rate increasing from 89% in 2012

to more than 93% as at the reporting date.

Liberec Plaza 
(Czech Republic) 

Opened March 2009

Plaza share 100%

 17,000m2

GLA 

Plaza continues to own and manage Liberec Plaza shopping and entertainment 
center. During 2013, the turnover of the mall improved by 10%, whilst occupancy 
increased from 80% in 2012 to 86%, including tenants such as Billa, Sephora, 
Dracik and Dinopark. Additionally, a lease agreement was recently signed with 
Sports Direct, which has opened the store in April 2014.

Riga Plaza 
(Latvia) 

Opened March 2009

Plaza share 50%

  Zgorzelec Plaza 
(Poland) 

Opened March 2010

Plaza share 100%

 49,000m2

GLA 

 13,000m2

GLA 

Riga Plaza shopping and entertainment center is located on the western bank 
of the Daugava river by the Sala Bridge. The two-fl oor mall includes an eight-
screen multiplex cinema and 2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. The center continues to 
deliver signifi cant operational improvements, seeing occupancy levels increase 
to 97% following the lease agreement signed wiht H&M for a 2,700m2 store 
which was opened in April 2014. There are ongoing discussions with a 
number of potential occupiers for the remaining space, therefore it is expected 
that the mall will be fully let by the end of 2014. Also footfall and turnover 
improved throughout the year by 7% and 14% respectively.

Zgorzelec Plaza, which has the only cinema in the area, achieved a signifi cant 
operational improvement throughout the year and continues to perform in 
line with expectations. The occupancy rate of the shopping and entertainment 
center was improved from 89% in 2012 to 91% as at the reporting date. In 
addition, footfall in the mall increased by 29% compared to 2012 and the 
center achieved a 58% growth in turnover on a year-to-year basis.

6

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

  Suwałki Plaza 
(Poland) 

Opened May 2010

Plaza share 100%

Torun´ Plaza 
(Poland) 

Opened November 2011

Plaza share 100%

 20,000m2

GLA 

 40,000m2

GLA 

Suwałki Plaza, the three-fl oor shopping and entertainment center which 
includes a three-screen cinema and a bowling center as well, is 91% let to 
international and local tenants such as H&M, Rossmann, New Yorker, KappAhl 
and Cinema Lumière, and continues to perform well. Turnover of the center 
increased by 10% compared to 2012.

Torun´ Plaza represents Plaza’s tenth completed center in Poland. The center is 
89% let to premium international and local brands such as Cinema City, H&M, 
C&A, KappAhl, Zara, Bershka, Stradivarius, Pull & Bear and Massimo Dutti, 
in addition TK Maxx, an anchor retailer, which opened a 2,700m2 store in 
March 2014.

 Kragujevac Plaza 
(Serbia) 

Opened March 2012

Plaza share 100%

 Koregaon Park Plaza 
  (India) 

Opened March 2012

Plaza share 100%

 22,000m2

GLA 

 41,000m2

GLA 

Plaza opened its fi rst Serbian shopping and entertainment center in 
Kragujevac, which is the fi rst western-style mall to be built outside the capital, 
Belgrade. As at the reporting date, the center is fully let to remarkable tenants, 
including Nike, Adidas, Aldo, New Yorker, Deichmann, TerraNova, Fashion 
and Friends, H&O, Oviesse, Fox, Chicco and Home Center. The center shows 
signifi cant improvements both in terms of footfall, which increased by 15%, 
and turnover, which increased by 17% compared to 2012, demonstrating 
Plaza’s ability to capitalize on opportunities in new markets.

In November 2013, the Group reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park 
Plaza, the Company’s fi rst completed entertainment and shopping center in 
India, subject to the fulfi lment of certain closing conditions.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Debt 
restructuring 
plan

Suspension of payment procedure 

On 18 November 2013, the Company applied for suspension of 
payments proceedings under Dutch law and simultaneously fi led a 
draft restructuring plan (the “restructuring plan” or “plan”) with the 
district court of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 

On 18 November 2013, the Court granted the Company a provisional 
suspension of payments, appointing an administrator and a 
supervisory judge. The Court determined that no hearing should 
take place for deciding on the granting of defi nitive suspension of 
payments, order that, instead, a creditors meeting will take place to 
vote on the restructuring plan on 26 June 2014 and determined that 
the Company’s creditors can fi le their claims for voting purposes 
before 12 June 2014.

Background 

The Company has been faced with challenging market conditions 
for some years. Adverse market conditions have primarily been 
caused by the underlying economic situation in many of the 
countries in which the Company operates, combined with the lack 
of transactional liquidity in the investment markets for assets such 
as those owned by the Company and the ongoing lack of traditional 
bank fi nancing available to real estate developers and investors. 

Although Board and senior management team have made 
considerable progress in repositioning the Company’s business 
model to ensure that it is focused on the deleveraging of its balance 
sheet and the recycling of capital, primarily through the disposal 
of its non-core assets, the Company has not been able to complete 
these transactions within a timeframe that would enable it to meet 
its short-term obligations towards the holders of Series A Notes, 
the holders of Series B Notes, the Polish bondholders and other 
unsecured creditors. As a result, by the end of 2013, the Company 
was faced with signifi cant liquidity problems. Notwithstanding the 
liquidity issues, the Company continues to have a strong balance 
sheet, with a signifi cant positive current net asset value, and owns 
assets and development opportunities that offer signifi cant potential 
to deliver returns over the medium to long-term. Accordingly, the 
Board believes that, on a going concern basis, the Company will 
retain substantial value for its stakeholders and will be able to repay 
its creditors in full, while the Board is certain that a forced liquidation 
would cause creditors and shareholders to incur signifi cant losses. 

Purpose and summary 

The plan is addressed to all ordinary unsecured creditors of the 
Company. The purpose of the restructuring plan is to provide the 
Company with the ability to preserve value for its creditors by giving it 
time to resolve its liquidity situation and thereby avoiding a liquidation 

scenario. This will primarily be achieved through a deferral of payment 
obligations. Apart from the proposed payment deferral, the terms of the 
restructuring plan do not require bondholders to take a loss on the par 
value of their outstanding exposures.

A general, high-level and non-exhaustive brief summary of the 
material agreed commercial terms are listed below: 

•  The plan shall be contingent upon the injection of a fresh €20 

million into the Company (“Equity Contribution”), and will become 
effective only once the placing of the Equity Contribution shall 
have been occurred. 

•  The Company shall issue to holders of unsecured debt (i.e., 

outstanding debt under the Israeli Series A and B Notes and the 
Polish Notes) (“Unsecured Debt”) 13.5% of the Company’s shares 
(post the Equity Contribution) for no consideration. Such issuance 
of shares will be distributed among the holders of Unsecured 
Debt pro rata to the relative share of each relevant creditor in the 
Deferred Debt (“Deferred Debt Ratio”). 

•  All principal payments due during the years 2013-2015 of any 
Unsecured Debt (“Deferred Debt”) shall be deferred for three 
years from the date of approval of the plan by the court in the 
Netherlands (“Approval Date”). If within two years from the 
Approval Date the Company manages to repay over 50% of the 
Deferred Debt, then the remaining principal payments of the 
Deferred Debt shall be deferred for an additional one year. 

•  Interest payments for the Unsecured Debt that were due during 

the suspension of payments period, will be added to the principal 
and paid together with it. Following the removal of the suspension 
of payments order (“Effective Date”), interest payments will be 
paid on their due dates. 

•  As of 1 January 2014, the annual interest rate of the Unsecured 

Debt shall be increased by 1.5%. 

•  Following the Effective Date, the Company shall pay to the holders 
of the Unsecured Debt an amount of €10.5 million on account of 
2014 interest payments. 

•  The Company, its directors and offi cers and its controlling 

shareholder shall be fully released from claims. 

•  Following the Effective Date, the Company will have to assign 

75% of the net proceeds received from the sale or refi nancing of 
any of its assets to early repayment of the Unsecured Debt, to be 
allocated among the holders of Unsecured Debt in accordance 
with the Deferred Debt Ratio. 

•  The Company will be allowed to execute actual investments 

only if the Company’s cash reserves contain an amount equal 
to general and administrative expenses and interest payments 
for the Unsecured Debt for a six-month period (for this purpose 
also receivables with a high probability of being collected in the 
subsequent six-month period will be taken in account for the 
required minimal cash reserve). 

•  The plan shall also include, inter alia: (i) certain limitations on 

distribution of dividends and incurring of new indebtedness; (ii) 
negative pledge on direct and indirect holdings of the Company 
on real estate assets; (iii) fi nancial covenants and undertakings 
of the Company with respect to the sale and fi nancing of certain 
projects and investment in new projects; and (iv) commitment to 
publish quarterly fi nancial statements as long as the Unsecured 
Debt is outstanding. 

Please note that the plan is yet to be fi nalised, therefore the above 
only provides a summary of the key material points without going 
into specifi c details. Full details of the plan, once submitted to the 
Dutch Court, will be provided on the Company’s website under 
Investor relations / Debt restructuring. 

8

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Competitive
strengths

Plaza’s clear priority is to conclude its restructuring process 

successfully whilst continuing to leverage the ability and expertise of 

its management team and the quality of its income generating assets 

across all key parameters such as occupancy levels, footfall and 

turnover to achieve success in its day-to-day operations.

Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring 

programme on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good progress 

towards resolving its liquidity situation to safeguard the continuity 

of the business and thereby protect the long-term interest of its 

investors, creditors and shareholders. The market prices of the 

Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the restructuring 

plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are moving 

forward. 

Whilst Plaza have witnessed some confi dence returning for 

prospects in Europe’s central and eastern regions, conditions in 

many of its markets remained challenging in 2013 as the persistent 

uncertainty created by the crisis continued to be felt. Against this 

backdrop, throughout 2013, Plaza made considerable operational 

improvements across its portfolio. These are clearly refl ected in the 

increase in occupancy levels from 89% at the end of 2012 to 93% 

as at the reporting date. At the same time, the Company continued 

to make good progress in the ongoing process of repositioning 

its business model, ensuring its continued focus on deleveraging 

the balance sheet and reallocating capital, primarily through 

the disposal of completed or non-core assets and reinvestment 

into its core yielding assets. This is best illustrated by the €61 

million raised during the year through the sale of fi ve assets, the 

remaining proceeds from the dissolution of the US holding entity 

and successful asset management initiatives at Torun´ Plaza, Suwałki 

Plaza, Kragujevac Plaza and Riga Plaza.

These improvements have been possible by leveraging of the deep 

relationships that Plaza has created with retailers over a number of 

years, many of whom the Company has helped introduce into new 

geographies. 

Despite its challenged liquidity position and restructuring process, 

Plaza’s belief in the strength of the underlying fundamentals of its 

assets and land reserves remains intact. By utilizing the extensive 

skills of its experienced management team, the deep relationships 

Plaza has with its tenants and fi nance providers, and maintaining 

its cautious but opportunistic approach, the Company is positioning 

itself, on completion of the restructuring, to be able to return 

the rewards of capital appreciation and income growth to its 

shareholders.

Proven track record

Plaza continues to benefi t from its unrivaled track record across 

CEE, having been active in the region for more than 18 years. Central 

and Eastern Europe economies are experiencing signs of a change 

in sentiment, with Poland and the Czech Republic both reporting 

increased investment activity in 2013. However, Plaza has seen 

marked differences between the countries north of the region, which 

have proved more resilient, and the struggling southern economies, 

including Romania and Bulgaria. Despite the challanging market 

conditions, several major milestones were achieved in 2013 and 

the period to date. On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that 

it had reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, 

entertainment and offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to 

the satisfaction of certain closing conditions. 

In addition, a number of signifi cant disposals of non-core assets 

during the year were achieved, as follows: 

•  In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily holds 

interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra.

•  In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its 

stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project 

(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third 

district of Prague.

•  In October, a consortium of shareholders in Dream Island, 

in which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale of the 

Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa 

€16.5 million (HUF 5 billion). 

•  In January 2014, in December, Plaza’s 70% subsidiary reached 

an agreement to sell its 50% equity stake (together with the 

other 50% joint venture partner) in the Új Udvar shopping mall in 

Budapest, Hungary.

•  Finally, Plaza also sold its interest in a SPV which owns a site in 

Roztoky, Czech Republic which was being held for a potential 

residential development. 

To date, 26 of the completed centers have been subsequently sold 

with an aggregate gross value of circa €1.16 billion. These disposals 

comprise seventeen shopping centers in Hungary, seven in Poland 

and two in the Czech Republic, with the remaining seven shopping 

centers currently being held as operational assets, of which three are 

located in Poland, one in the Czech Republic, one in Latvia, one in 

Serbia and one in India (agreement to sell is in place).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

9

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

plaza centers/overview

 comp

Plaza focuses upon creating an attractive tenant mix, including 

In addition, as stated above, Plaza reached an agreement to sell 

fashion, hypermarkets, food courts, electronics, sports and other 

Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and offi ce scheme 

retailers, with a special focus on entertainment. Most centers include 

located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction of certain closing 

a cinema multiplex, as well as a Fantasy Park, a state-of-the-art 

conditions.

entertainment and amusement facility operated by Plaza’s subsidiary, 

which includes bowling alleys, billiard tables, video arcades, internet 

With two major JV developments in India due to be delivered in the 

cafés, children’s playgrounds, bars and discos.

next few years, the Company’s substantial local platform means 

Flexible business model

During the years 1996-2004, when exit yields were high, the Group 

retained and operated shopping centers on completion and earned 

rental income. Once property yields decreased, between 2004-2008, 

the Group sold 26 shopping centers in line with the Company’s 

commercial decision to focus its business more on development and 

sale rather than operational management. 

Mindful of the impact of the ongoing issues in the Eurozone on 

the economies in which Plaza operates, the Company will continue 

to fi nd the optimal blend of reducing its levels of gearing while 

progressing its limited developing programme into the strongest 

economies of the CEE. Plaza’s cautious but opportunistic approach 

is set to unlock signifi cant value on behalf of its shareholders. It will 

continue to sell completed developments as appropriate, but will 

hold them on its balance sheet and benefi t from the rental income 

until suffi cient sale prices are achieved.

Diversifi cation

Plaza is strategically placed to create shareholders value from this 

growth market.

Having monitored the US real estate market for a number of 

years, Plaza announced its fi rst transaction in the region in 2010 

through the acquisition of a strategic stake in EDT Retail Trust 

with its joint venture partners. During 2011, Plaza achieved its 

aim of repositioning the portfolio through reducing debt levels, 

improving occupancy rates as well as lengthening lease maturities. 

Consequently, in June 2012, EPN Group, Plaza’s US-based joint 

venture, completed the sale of 47 of its 49 US-based assets in a 

transaction valued at US$1.428 billion, which refl ects an ROE for 

Plaza of nearly 50% in a period of little over 18 months. In July 

2012, EPN Group completed the disposal phase of the Company’s 

highly successful fi rst venture in the US with the sale of its two 

remaining US assets, and in March 2013, Plaza received the 

remaining proceeds from the dissolution of the US holding entity.

Limited number of active developments

In light of market conditions, Plaza took the strategic decision in 

The Group is well diversifi ed and active in eight countries in CEE 

the second half of 2008 to scale back on the commencement of 

and India, while additional countries are being examined for further 

new projects and to focus on projects with availability of external 

expansion.

Plaza sees strong importance in its investment in India, which has 

been less affected by the global economic crisis and will offer Plaza 

attractive development prospects for at least the next 10 years. Plaza 

has maintained its long-term view of the strong potential demand for 
residential and commercial Indian real estate, especially for welllocated 

large scale development projects. The sentiment towards the Indian 

real estate market remains extremely positive, underpinned by funda-

mentals which are driving the country’s long-term economic growth. 

Phase one of the Kharadi Plaza project known as “Matrix One”, a 

50:50 joint venture with a local partner, was completed in February 
2012. Located in Pune, India, “Matrix One”, a 28,000m2 GLA offi ce, 
was 70% pre-sold upon opening, and in May 2013, Plaza sold its 

50% stake in a vehicle which primarily holds interest in Kharadi 

Plaza project. 

fi nancing and strong tenants demand. Plaza will progress a selected 

number of projects in the CEE, such as Poland , Serbia and Romania 

where GDP growth and forecasts remain above the average for 

Europe. The deferral of the repayment of our debt maturities enables 

us to progress with the initiation of projects and investment as 

appropriate, including actively managing our income generating 

assets to prepare for their ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify 

exit opportunities from our remaining non-core assets. Construction 

is planned to commence on Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) in Serbia, 

Casa Radio, Timisoara Plaza and Cina in Romania, and Chennai in 

India. The Company’s cautious but opportunistic approach is set to 

unlock signifi cant value on behalf of its shareholders.

Conservative leverage

The Group’s debt position remains conservative, with gearing of 

64% at the year end. Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its 

10

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

etitive strengths

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

balance sheet during the period but, as a result of impairment losses 

recorded in the period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level 

Highly skilled management team

Extensive local and business knowledge with a proven ability 

to source strategic development sites, as well as purchasing 

yielding assets at an attractive price and designing projects that 

meet the demands of the local market. A signifi cant proportion of 

management team members have been with Plaza for several years.

Extensive network

A vast and extremely well established network of business 

connections with most anchors and large international tenants and 

extensive business relationships with large international funds and 

real estate market participants. This has been demonstrated by our 

proven ability to pre-sell projects (before or during the construction) 

and achieve high levels of pre-lets.

Thorough project evaluation

Prior to each project, Plaza goes through a carefully developed, 

structured evaluation process involving each of the relevant 

disciplines (economics, engineering, marketing, etc.).

increased. 

In November 2013, the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary signed 

a new €59.3 million investment loan with a consortium comprising 

two banks for its shopping and entertainment center in Riga, 

Latvia. The new facility has duration of four years and therefore 

substantially lengthens the duration of the debt compared to the 

previous loan facility, which was due for repayment on 30 June 

2014.

Total bank borrowing reduced to €175 million. This decrease is 

primarily the result of loans disposed of and repaid during the year. 

All loans were accounted for as current liabilities following the 

suspension of payments by Plaza and the uncertainty surrounding 

the restructuring plan.

Clearly identifi ed pipeline and acquisitions

Plaza is engaged in 27 development projects, and owns two offi ce 

buildings and seven operational assets, located across the CEE 

region and in India. The Group has the ability to identify new growth 

opportunities, constantly targeting attractive returns in fastgrowing 

emerging markets.

Capital markets

On 20 November 2012, the Board approved the extension of the 

Company’s second bond buyback programme of A and B series 

Notes traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange. The bond buyback 

programme will conclude on 31 December 2014 with a maximum 

amount to be purchased of up to NIS 600 million, increased from 

NIS 150 million. Under the two bond buyback schemes (the fi rst 

was concluded on 28 November 2011 in which the target of 

NIS 150 million was fully executed), Plaza has to date repurchased 

and cancelled NIS 38.6 million par value of its A and B series bonds 

and as of 31 December 2013 the outstanding amount was 

NIS 15.9 million par value of bond series B, as a result of bond 

repayments and bonds resale.

Strong brand name

Plaza Centers has become a widely recognized brand name for 

successful property development in CEE which is benefi cial at 

all stages of project execution (e.g. following portfolio sales to 

Klépierre, Dawnay Day and aAIM, the purchasers continue to use the 

“Plaza Centers” trade name under license).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

11

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Our markets

Europe

  Poland 

  Serbia 

  Romania

  Latvia 

  Czech Repp. 

  Hungary 

  Greece 

  Bulgaria 

  India 

India

* Source: CIA – The World Factbook.

12

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

Marrkket daataa

CurCurrrCuCu renrennt mt maarkrkeet

Population (m)*

  Poland 

  Serbia 

  Romania 

  Latvia 

  Czech Republic 

38.4

7.2

21.8

2.2

10.6

GDP per capita*

  Hungary 

  Greece 

  Bulgaria 

  India 

10

10.8

7

1,221

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

10

8

6

4

2

0

Serbia Romania

Latvia

Czech
Republic

Hungary Greece Bulgaria

India

Unemployment*

Serbia Romania

Latvia

Czech
Republic

Hungary Greece Bulgaria

India

CPI - Change in 2013*

Serbia Romania

Latvia

Czech
Republic

Hungary

Bulgaria

India

Greece

 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Our portfolio 
at a glance

Total of 29 assets located across CEE region and in India. 
Estimated value of €2,039 million on completion.

Portfolio composition – by country 

Market value of the land and project (€m)2

10

8

6

4

2

0

1

9

  Active 

  Under development/planning 

  Offi ces

4

3

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

Poland

Serbia Romania

Latvia

Czech
Republic

Hungary Greece Bulgaria

India

  Project 

  Complete and active projects 

  Current developments 

  Pipeline projects 

Total as at 31 December 2013 

1 Value of Plaza Centers’ stake by Cushman and Wakefi eld as of 31 December 2013.

2 Excluding Koregaon Park Plaza, as there is an agreement for sale in place.

3 Some of the assets were valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was estimated.

Group NAV at 31 December 2013

  Market value of land and projects by Cushman and Wakefi eld4 

  Assets minus liabilities as at 31 December 20135 

  Total 

  NAV per issued share 

4 Except for Târgu Mures¸ (Romania) project, where the company has applied a more conservative value.

5 Excluding book value of assets which were valued by Cushman and Wakefi eld.

180

177

77

44

18

12

15

2

28

Serbia Romania

Latvia

Czech
Republic

Hungary Greece Bulgaria

India

200

160

120

80

40

0

Market value on 
completion (€m)1 

Market value of the land
and the project (€m)1

261.52 

1,067.9 

709.13 

2,038,5 

261.52

195.8

90.5 

547.8

€’000

545,142

(271,370)

273,772

£0.79

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Timis¸oara 
Plaza
Romania

38,000m2
GLA

Plaza owns a plot of land with an area of 32,000m2 in 
Timis¸oara, on which it is intending to develop a shopping 

and entertainment center. The planned center will 
have a GLA of approximately 38,000m2 and includes a 
supermarket, a hypermarket complex, fashion retailers, a 

fantasy park, a food court and restaurants. Plaza intends 

to commence construction in 2014/2015 and the center is 

scheduled to open in 2016.

Development
focus

The Company took the strategic 
decision to scale back on starting 
new projects and acquisitions, and to 
focus on projects with availability of 
external fi nancing or strong tenants 
demand. In the near future the Group 
plans to progress in a selected 
number of projects which are: Casa 
Radio (fi rst phase), Timis¸oara Plaza 
and Cina in Romania; Łódz´ Plaza in 
Poland; Belgrade Plaza (MUP) and 
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) in Serbia 
and Chennai in India. Out of these 
seven projects Plaza presents here 
three, which it intends to complete in 
the upcoming years.

14

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Łódz´ 
Plaza
Poland

35,000m2
GLA

Łódz´ is the second largest city in Poland with over 740,000 

inhabitants. The site owned by Plaza is located in a residential 

district of the city with a catchment area of 270,000 people. 

Łódz´ Plaza is planned to be a two-fl oor shopping and entertain-

ment center with approximately 35,000 m² of GLA anchored 

by a supermarket, a department store as well as a multi-screen 

cinema and bowling and entertainment center. The project 

is currently under Master Plan stage which is expected to be 

completed by the end of 2014. Plaza intends to commence 

construction in 2015/2016, with completion targeted for 2017.

Belgrade 
Plaza 
(Visnjicka)
Serbia

32,000m2
GLA

Plaza owns a 31,000m2 plot of land in Belgrade, the capital 
of Serbia. The Belgrade market offers particular potential, 

with its large populated catchment area of approximately 

2.5 million people. Plaza intends to develop a new shopping 

and entertainment center with a GLA of approximately 
32,000m2. The Group intends to commence construction 
in 2014/2015 and the center is scheduled to open in 

2015/2016.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

15

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Current 
portfolio

Poland

  Project 

City 

Ownership 

GLA (m2) 

Market value   Market value of the 

Expected

  Torun´ Plaza 

  Suwałki Plaza 

Torun´  

Suwałki 

  Zgorzelec Plaza 

Zgorzelec 

  Łódz´ Plaza 

  Kielce Plaza 

  Leszno Plaza 

  Łódz´ (Residential) 

Łódz´  

Kielce 

Leszno 

Łódz´ 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

*  Operating           **   Under planning and feasibility examination

1  In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used 

in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.

2   Asset was valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was 

estimated.

3   GBA

Plaza has already completed 10 shopping and entertainment 

centers in Poland of which seven have already been sold. 

Currently the Group owns and operates three completed shopping 

and entertainment centers across Poland. During the year, each 

of the centers have delivered notable asset management success, 
with over 6,800m2 of new lettings achieved, improving overall 
occupancy throughout the Polish portfolio from 87% in 2012 to 

90% as at the reporting date.

on completion 

land and project 

completion

31 December  

31 December

2013 (€) 

2013 (€)

97,580,000 

97,580,000  Opened in Q4 2011*

43,525,000 

43,525,000  Opened in Q2 2010*

17,125,000 

17,125,000  Opened in Q1 2010*

74,214,000 

7,925,000 

2017

75,502,000 

5,350,0001 

n/a2 

1,719,000 

6,500,000 

**

**

**

40,000 

20,000 

13,000 

35,000 

33,000 

16,000 

80,0003 

89,331,000 

Torun´ Plaza

Torun´ Plaza: complete and active project

Zgorzelec Plaza: complete and active project

Torun´ Plaza is located in Torun´, an almost 800-year-old city of 

Zgorzelec Plaza is located in Zgorzelec in south west Poland, 

approximately 200,000 inhabitants. Torun´ is one of the most 

near the German border. Thanks to two roads border crossing 

beautiful cities of Poland located at the intersection of ancient trade 

(including one of the largest in Poland), a railway border crossing 

routes. The gothic buildings of Torun´’s old town were designated as 

and the restored old town bridge which connects the old towns 

a world heritage site by UNESCO in 1997. Torun´ Plaza, which opened 

of Zgorzelec and Goerlitz (58,000 citizens on the German side), 

in November 2011, is the Group’s tenth completed development 

Zgorzelec is a “gate” between Germany and Poland. The shopping 

in Poland. The two-fl oor shopping and entertainment center with 
approximately 40,000m2 of GLA, is anchored by Zara, Reserved, 
Home & You, New Yorker, H&M, Media Expert, Carry, TK Maxx, a 

multi-screen Cinema City, Pure fi tness center as well as a Fantasy 

and entertainment center is situated less than fi ve minutes walking 

distance from the railway station. Zgorzelec Plaza comprises 
approximately 13,000m2 of GLA anchored by H&M, KappAhl, 
Douglas, Carry, a Fantasy Park entertainment area, a fi tness center, 

Park bowling and entertainment area. In 2013, occupancy of the 

the only cinema in the area and 300 parking spaces. In 2013, 

mall increased to 89% compared to 84% in 2012. The contract with 
TK Maxx, the multinational fashion retailer was signed for 2700m2, 
creating a new two-level store which was opened in March 2014. 

The letting represents circa 7% of the total lettable area of the mall.

occupancy increased to 91% from 89% in 2012 and the center 

achieved a 58% growth in turnover on a year-to-year basis.

16

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Suwałki Plaza

Leszno Plaza

Suwałki Plaza: complete and active project

Kielce Plaza: pipeline project

Suwałki Plaza is located in Suwałki, a city crossed by expressway 

Plaza has won a competitive tender and acquired a site from PKS 

E67(8), which links Augustow with the Lithuanian border. Suwałki 

Kielce S.A. (the local branch of the Polish National Bus Company) 

is a city with approximately 70,000 inhabitants and is located 45km 

for the development of a major new shopping and entertainment 

from the Polish-Lithuanian border. The creation of Suwałki special 

center in Kielce. The new center will be located on a 30,000m² plot 

economic zone offers new opportunities for trade, commerce and 

alongside a major road and two km from the heart of Kielce. Kielce 

tourism. Suwałki Plaza, which was opened in May 2010, is located 

has over 200,000 inhabitants and an estimated catchment area of 

in the main commercial and residential district of the city and is 

approximately 350,000 people, and is located in Central Poland on 

fronted by an important arterial route to the east. It is also located 

the main motorway linking Warsaw and Kraków. On completion, 

on a junction of a street which links directly into the city center. The 

the scheme will have a GLA of 33,000m², and approximately 

PKS bus terminal and main railway station are located approximately 

1,000 car parking spaces. The Company will be targeting a mixture 

one km from the shopping and entertainment center. Suwałki 

of domestic and high-profi le international retailers and entertainment 

Plaza is a three-fl oor shopping and entertainment center with 
approximately 20,000m2 of GLA anchored by Delima delicatessen, 
H&M, KappAhl, Deichmann, Carry, HeBe, Douglas and Empik. The 

operators as potential tenants for the center. The project is under 

planning and feasibility examination.

entertainment area comprises a three-screen cinema and bowling 

Leszno Plaza: pipeline project

and entertainment center. In 2013, occupancy increased to 91% 

compared to 90% in 2012.

Łódz´  Plaza: current development

Plaza has a perpetual usufruct over a 18,000m² site in Leszno, 

for the development of a new shopping and entertainment center. 

The site is ideally located in the center of Leszno, a city with 

65,000 inhabitants, situated in western Poland between the two 

Łódz´  Plaza is located in Łódz´ , the second largest city in Poland with 

big economic centers of Poznan´ and Wrocław, and is close to 

over 740,000 inhabitants.

the central railway and bus station. On completion, the shopping 

Łódz´  is recognized as an important academic and cultural center 

and entertainment center is intended to have a GLA of 16,000m² 

in Poland, hosting well-known cultural events. The site is located 

providing space for over 70 shops and 450 car parking spaces. The 

in a residential district of the city with a catchment area of 270,000 

project is under planning and feasibility examination.

people. Łódz´  Plaza is planned to be a two-fl oor shopping and 

entertainment center with approximately 35,000m² of GLA anchored 

Łódz´  (Residential): pipeline project

by a supermarket, a department store as well as a multi-screen 

cinema and bowling and entertainment center. The project is 

Plaza owns part of a development site and has a perpetual usufruct 

currently under Master Plan stage, which shall be prepared by the 

over the remaining part of the site, located in the center of Łódz´, which 

city municipality and the process is expected to be completed by 

is suitable for use as a residential and offi ces area. The city of Łódz´, 

the end of 2014. The Group intends to commence construction in 

which is the administrative capital of the Łódzkie region, is situated in 

2015/2016, with completion targeted for 2017.

the center of Poland approximately 140km south west of Warsaw, and, 

with a population of over 740,000, it is the second most populous city 

in Poland. The site is located in the central university district, within 

500 meters of the popular Piotrkowska pedestrian street. The site is 

also located in close proximity to large high density housing estates. 

The planned development will comprise built area of approximately 
80,000m2. The Group is also considering selling the plot.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

17

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Current 
portfolio

Serbia

  Project 

City 

Ownership 

GLA (m2) 

Market value   Market value of the 

Expected

on completion 

land and project 

completion

31 December  

31 December

2013 (€) 

2013 (€)

  Kragujevac Plaza 

Kragujevac 

  Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) 

Belgrade 

  Belgrade Plaza (MUP) 

Belgrade 

100% 

100% 

100% 

22,000 

32,000 

41,775,000 

41,775,000  Opened in Q1 2012*

108,309,000 

19,025,000 

2015-2016

63,0001 

145,729,000 

16,150,000 

2017

*  Operating

1   GBA

In March 2012, Plaza completed its fi rst shopping and 

entertainment center in Serbia, Kragujevac Plaza. It is the fi rst 

western-style shopping and entertainment center to be opened 

outside the capital, Belgrade. As of the reporting date, the center 

is fully let to remarkable tenants, demonstrating the success 

of the Company’s fi rst venture into Serbia. Currently the Group 

has two additional sites for the development of mixed-use and 

shopping and entertainment projects in the capital Belgrade.

Kragujevac Plaza: complete and active project

Kragujevac Plaza

Kragujevac is the fourth largest city in Serbia with a population of 

180,000 inhabitants and a wider catchment area of approximately 

Belgrade Plaza (MUP): current development

490,000 people. It is the largest city in the Sumadija region and the 

administrative center of the region.

The shopping and entertainment center, which was opened to 
the public in March 2012, comprises 22,000m2 of GLA and is 
anchored by C&A, New Yorker, Home Center, Cineplexx, Deichmann, 

McDonald’s, Adidas, Benetton and Idea.

Plaza won a competitive tender announced by the Government of 

Serbia for a site located in the center of Belgrade, which it intends to 

develop into an offi ce space together with a hotel and retail gallery. 
The development is expected to comprise a total of 63,000m2 of GBA 
including an apartment hotel, business center and shopping gallery 

Kragujevac Plaza is the fi rst western-style shopping center that has 

as well as 700 car parking spaces. 

been completed in Serbia outside the capital, Belgrade.

Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka): current development

The Belgrade market offers particular potential, with its large 

populated catchment area of approximately 2.5 million people. The 

new complex will be located on the prominent site of the former 

Plaza owns a 31,000m2 plot of land in Belgrade, the capital of 
Serbia. The Belgrade market offers particular potential, with its large 

Federal Ministry of Internal Affairs, situated on the main street 

which runs through the center of Belgrade. The area is home to 

populated catchment area of approximately 2.5 million people. 

foreign embassies, the Serbian Government, the Serbian Ministry of 

The Company intends to develop a new shopping and entertainment 
center with a total GLA of approximately 32,000m2. The Group 
intends to commence construction in 2014/2015 and the center is 

Finance, the Belgrade Chamber of Commerce and Belgrade’s largest 

public hospital as well as the city fair and the future railway station. 

The Group intends to commence construction in 2015/2016 and the 

scheduled to open in 2015/2016.

center is scheduled to open in 2017.

18

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
O
V
V
E
E
R
R
V
V

I
I

E
E
W
W

Belgrade 
Plaza 
(MUP)
Serbia

63,000m2
GBA

The building is located in the center of Belgrade in 

a neighborhood of government offi ces and foreign 

embassies. On completion, Belgrade Plaza (MUP) will 

comprise a shopping gallery, an apartment hotel and 

business center. Construction is planned to commence in 

2015/2016 and completion is scheduled for 2017.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

19

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Current 
portfolio

Romania

  Project 

City 

Ownership 

GLA (m2) 

Market value   Market value of the 

Expected

on completion 

land and project 

completion

31 December  

31 December

2013 (€) 

2013 (€)

700 

1,800,000 

1,800,000 

Operating

38,000 

76,965,000 

10,825,000 

555,0001 

622,880,000 

130,613,000 

2016

20172

4,786 

58,000 

14,000 

17,000 

14,000 

10,000 

18,000 

n/a4 

n/a4 

2015-2016

94,946,000 

11,550,000 

14,868,000 

40,920,000 

9,959,000 

5,620,000 

1,650,000 

2,375,000 

72,344,000 

6,175,0005                  

n/a6 

6,300,000 

*

*

*

*

*

*

100% 

100% 

75% 

100%3 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

  Palazzo Ducale 

  Timis¸oara Plaza 

  Casa Radio 

  Cina Plaza 

Ias¸i 

Bucharest 

Timis¸oara  

Bucharest 

Bucharest 

Ias¸i 

  Csíki Plaza  

Miercurea Ciuc 

  Slatina Plaza 

Slatina  

  Hunedoara Plaza 

Hunedoara 

  Târgu Mures¸ Plaza 

Târgu Mures¸  

  Constant¸a Plaza 

Constant¸a 

*   Under planning and feasibility examination

1  GBA

2   First phase

3  Development rights

4  External valuation was not conducted.

5  In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used 

in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.

6   Asset was valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was 

estimated.

Plaza has a signifi cant development pipeline in Romania, 

with nine sites for shopping and entertainment centers and 

mixed-use schemes in various stages of development. 

The Company continues checking the feasibility and planning of 

the projects, including obtaining permits. 

Timis¸oara Plaza

Palazzo Ducale (Bucharest): operational offi ce

Timis¸oara Plaza: current development

In October 2007, the Company acquired a prestigious French-style 

villa converted into an offi ce building. The building is located in the 

Plaza owns a plot of land with an area of 32,000m2 in Timis¸oara, on 
which it is intending to develop a shopping and entertainment center. 

center of Bucharest and was completely renovated in 2005. The total 
constructed area is approximately 700m2,  built on a plot of around 
600m2 and consists of three fl oors, a basement and a garage. 
All three fl oors are currently leased.

The site is situated in the north east of Timis¸oara, a city in western 

Romania, close to the border with Hungary with a population 

of 320,000 inhabitants and a catchment area of approximately 

700,000 inhabitants. The site is situated on a three-way junction 

and enjoys excellent visibility. The planned center will have a GLA of 
approximately 38,000m2 which is intended to include a supermarket, 
a hypermarket complex, fashion retailers, a fantasy park, a food 

court and restaurants. The Group intends to commence construction 

in 2014/2015 and the center is scheduled to open in 2016.

20

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Casa
Radio 
Romania

555,000m2
GBA

Casa Radio will include a 76,000m2 GLA shopping mall 
with an 11,000m2 hypermarket and indoor leisure center 
(one of the largest in Europe), ferris wheel, approximately 
148,000m2 GLA of offi ces, hotel complex with conference 
center and 300 rooms, an apartment hotel with 150 

apartments, casino and approximately 4,500 underground 

car parking spaces.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

21

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Romania

Casa Radio (Bucharest): current development

In February 2007, the Company consummated a transaction for the 

acquisition of a 75% interest in a company (the “Project Company”), 

which under a public-private partnership agreement with the 

Government of Romania is expected to develop the Casa Radio 

(Dambovit¸a) site in central Bucharest. The property comprises a 
site covering an approximate area of 92,000m2 (97,000m2 including 
5,000m2 for Public Authority Building (“PAB”)).
The proposed scheme will comprise the refurbishment of the existing 

building as well as the development of additional space annexed 

to the building and on adjoining land. The development of Casa 
Radio comprises approximately 555,000m2 of built area, including 
a 76,000m2 GLA shopping mall with an 11,000m2 hypermarket and 
indoor leisure center (one of the largest in Europe), ferris wheel, 
approximately 148,000m2 GLA of offi ces, hotel complex with 
conference center and 300 rooms, an apartment hotel with 150 

apartments, casino and approximately 4,500 underground car parking 

Ias¸i Plaza: pipeline project

Ias¸i Plaza

Hunedoara Plaza

spaces. The Company expects to complete the fi rst phase of the pro-

ject, which includes the shopping center, parking and PAB, in 2017.

Plaza has purchased a 46,500m2 plot of land in Ias¸i, on which it 
is expecting to develop a shopping and entertainment center and 

offi ce space. Ias¸i Plaza is situated in Ias¸i, a city in the north east of 

Romania, with a population of approximately 350,000 inhabitants 

and a catchment area of approximately 820,000 inhabitants. The 
shopping center is planned to comprise approximately 40,000m2 of 
GLA, and is intended to include an anchor supermarket, a cinema, 

fashion retailers, a fantasy park, a food court and restaurants. In 
addition, the project is intended to include offi ce space of 18,000m2 
GLA. The project is under planning and feasibility examination.

Csíki Plaza: pipeline project

Slatina Plaza

Plaza purchased a plot of land with an area of 36,500m2 in Miercurea 
Ciuc, for the development of a shopping and entertainment center. 

Cina (Bucharest): current development

Plaza has lease rights for 49 years (starting 12/2007) for an existing 

building in Cina, Bucharest. Cina is located in Bucharest city center, 

on Calea Victoriei Venue, next to Romanian Athenaeum, among 

central iconic landmarks: Romanian Art Museum, Revolution 

Csíki Plaza is situated in the center of Miercurea Ciuc, a city in 

Romania, with a population of 50,000 inhabitants and a catchment 

area of approximately 300,000 inhabitants. The site is situated 

400 meters from the city hall. The shopping center is planned to 
have a GLA of approximately 14,000m2, and is intended to include 
a supermarket, fashion retailers, a food court and restaurants. 

Construction commenced in late 2008 and stopped during 2009 

Square, Central University Library and more. The Group intends to 

due to lack of interest from tenants derived from the economic 

develop the building into an exclusive offi ce building with luxury 
retail space with a GLA of approximately 5,000m2. The Group intends 
to commence construction in 2014 and the center is scheduled to 

crisis. Currently the Group intends to sell the project or alternatively 

checking the option to lease-up the project parallel to the 

development of other sites in Romania – subject to leasing progress 

open in 2015/2016.

and fi nancing. 

22

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Cina
Plaza 
Romania

4,786m2
GLA

Cina Plaza is located in Bucharest city center, on Calea 

Victoriei Venue, next to Romanian Athenaeum. The Group 

intends to develop the building into an exclusive offi ce 

building with luxury retail space with a GLA of approximately 
5,000m2. The Group intends to commence construction in 
2014 and the center is scheduled to open in 2015/2016.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

23

Slatina Plaza: pipeline project

Plaza has acquired a site in Slatina, in southern Romania. The site 
totals approximately 24,000m2 and is located in the north west part 
of Slatina. Slatina is a city with around 80,000 inhabitants and is 

considered a major city in the county of Olt which has approximately 

520,000 inhabitants. The Company plans to build a shopping and 
entertainment center with approximately 17,000m2 of GLA. 
The project is under planning and feasibility examination.

Hunedoara Plaza: pipeline project

Plaza has acquired a 41,000m2 site in Hunedoara. The site is 
intended to be developed into a modern, western-style shopping and 
entertainment center, with 14,000m2 of GLA. It is ideally located on 
the main entry to the city from Deva which is near the city center. 

It has 70,000 inhabitants and catchment area of 200,000 people. 

The project is under planning and feasibility examination.

Târgu Mures¸ Plaza: pipeline project

Plaza has acquired a 31,500m2 site in Târgu Mures¸, to develop 
a power center, with a planned GLA of 10,000m2. The proposed 
development is ideally located near to the city center, close to the 

main road that links to the neighbouring towns of Cluj-Napoca and 

Alba Iulia. The project is under planning and feasibility examination.

Constant¸a: pipeline project

Plaza has acquired a 26,500m2 plot in Constant¸a. The plot is 
conveniently located on one of the two main entrance roads to the 

city and consists of an existing shopping center and an open parking 
lot of 8,500m2. Constant¸a is located on the Black Sea bank and is 
one of Romania’s main industrial, commercial and tourist centers. 

The Group is investigating the option of adapting the existing 
shopping center to create approximately 18,000m2 of GLA which will 
be suitable for one big anchor such as a leading supermarket and/or 

a DIY store together with some smaller retail units.

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Current 
portfolio

India

  Project 

City 

Ownership 

GLA (m2) 

Market value   Market value of the 

Expected

  Koregaon Park Plaza 

  Chennai 

  Bangalore 

Pune 

Chennai 

Bangalore 

100% 

40% 

25% 

41,000 

230,0002 

310,0003 

on completion 

land and project 

completion

31 December  

31 December

2013 (€) 

SOLD1 

2013 (€)

SOLD1  Opened in Q1 2012*

39,899,000 

11,272,000 

2014-2019

90,665,000 

12,251,000 

**

*  Operating           **   Under planning and feasibility examination

1  The Company signed an agreement for the sale of Koregaon Park Plaza (subject to the 

fulfi lment of certain closing conditions), therefore no valuation was conducted. 

The book value of the asset is circa €40 million.

2  For sale.

3  GBA                       

In May 2013, the Group has completed its fi rst transaction in India 

with the sale of its 50% interest in a vehicle which mainly holds 

interest in an offi ce complex project located in Pune, India. 

In November 2013, the Group reached an agreement to 

sell Koregaon Park Plaza, its fi rst completed shopping and 

entertainment center in India which was opened in 2012. 

Currently the Group has interest (through a joint venture with Elbit 

Imaging) in two sites for residential developments located in the 

cities of Chennai and Bangalore.

Bangalore

Koregaon Park Plaza: complete and active project

Chennai: current development

Koregaon Park Plaza shopping and entertainment center comprises 
a 41,000m2 GLA and it was completed and opened to the public in 
March 2012. It is the Group’s fi rst completed project in India and 

The Indian JV Vehicle (in which Plaza’s share is 50%) has an 

80% stake in a company which holds a 75 acres plot (and paid 

advances in order to secure acquisition of an additional 8.4 acres) 

is located in the upmerket area of Pune, Maharashta State. In June 

in Chennai, India’s fourth largest city with a population of over 

2012, a fi re event occurred at the center (due to a tenant’s faulty 

electrical equipment), which required a temporary close-down, 

but did not consume it entirely. The center’s safety and evacuation 

procedures were implemented quickly and effi ciently and no injuries 

eight million people. The site will be developed into a residential 
project consisting of approximately 160,000m2 of plotted area for 
development and approximately 70,000m2 for high quality villas. The 
Company anticipates that the project will be completed in phases 

occurred in the incident. Although roughly two thirds of the center’s 

between 2014/2015 to 2018/2019. 

rentable area was reopened in August 2012, the reminder of the cen-

ter required extensive renovation and these works were completed 

Bangalore: pipeline project

in the second quarter of 2013. In June 2013 the Company collected 

INR 529 million (€6.9 million) refund from the insurance company 

The Indian JV Vehicle currently has a 50% stake in a company which 

in connection with the damage occurred in the fi re in Koregaon Park 

has rights on a 54 acres plot in Bangalore. The site located on the 

shopping center, which covered all the renovation costs. 

eastern side of Bangalore, India’s fi fth largest city, with a population 

In November 2013 Plaza reached an agreement to sell the Koregaon 

of over eight million people. The JV Vehicle intends to develop 

Park Plaza, subject to the fulfi lment of certain closing conditions.

the site into a mega mixed-use project with a total built area of 
310,000m2. The project will comprise over 1,100 luxury residential 
units. The project is under planning and feasibility examination. 

24

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Koregaon Park Plaza, India

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

25

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Latvia 
Czech Republic 
Hungary 
Greece 
Bulgaria

  Project 

City 

Ownership 

GLA (m2) 

Market value   Market value of the 

Expected

on completion 

land and project 

completion

31 December  

31 December

2013 (€) 

2013 (€)

  Latvia 

  Riga Plaza 

  Czech Republic 

  Liberec Plaza 

  Hungary 

Riga 

50% 

49,000 

43,863,000 

43,863,000  Opened in Q1 2009*

Liberec 

100% 

17,000 

17,675,000 

17,675,000  Opened in Q1 2009*

  David House 

Budapest 

  Arena Plaza extension 

Budapest 

100% 

100% 

2,000 

40,000 

3,950,000 

3,950,000 

Operating

88,941,000 

7,800,000 

  Greece 

  Pireas Plaza 

  Bulgaria

Athens 

100% 

26,000 

94,555,000 

15,300,000 

  Shumen Plaza 

Shumen 

100% 

20,000 

31,260,000 

2,125,000 

** 

**

**

*  Operating           **   Under planning and feasibility examination

Plaza owns two operating shopping centers in Latvia and in the 

Czech Republic, three developments in Hungary, Greece and 

Bulgaria, and one offi ce building in Hungary.

Latvia

Riga Plaza: complete and active project

Liberec Plaza, Czech Republic

Riga Plaza is located on the west coast of the Daugava river, south 

west of  Riga’s city center. Riga, the capital of Latvia and the largest 

city in the Baltic States, has a population of approximately 750,000 

inhabitants. Riga Plaza has excellent connections to the city center 

(a three to fi ve-minute drive), as well as outstanding connections 

to the nearby main roads. There are eight public transport stops 

Czech Republic

(trolleybus and bus) located within 500 meters, with the nearest 

Liberec Plaza: complete and active project

public transport stop located directly in front of Riga Plaza. The 

primary catchment area is made up of the 350,000 inhabitants 

Liberec Plaza is located in the center of Liberec, a city in the north of 

of Riga’s west coast. Riga Plaza is a two-fl oor shopping and 
entertainment center with a GLA of approximately 49,000m2, 
anchored by a hypermarket, an eight-screen multiplex cinema 
and 2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. In 2013, occupancy of the mall has 
increased to 97% from 94% in 2012. H&M, a multinational fashion 
retailer signed a contract for 2,700m2 store which was opened in 
April 2014. It is expected that the mall will be fully let by the end 

of 2014.

the Czech Republic, close to the border with Germany and Poland, 

with a population of 101,000 inhabitants and catchment area of 

approximately 350,000 inhabitants. The site is situated 20 meters from 

the main square. The complete center comprises of approximately 
17,000m2 of GLA, and includes an anchor supermarket, fashion 
retailers, a squash and sports center, a Dinopark, a food court and 

restaurants. The center is also comprising a residential area of 
514m2 (fi ve apartments) and 1,100m2 of offi ce space. The center 
was opened to the public in March 2009. Occupancy of the mall 

increased in 2013 to 86% compared to 80% in 2012.

26

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Riga
Plaza 
Latvia

49,000m2
GLA

Riga Plaza is a two-fl oor shopping and entertainment 
center with a GLA of approximately 49,000m2, anchored 
by a hypermarket, an eight-screen multiplex cinema and 
2,000m2 of Fantasy Park. It is expected that the mall 
will be fully let by the end of 2014.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

27

W
E

I

V
R
E
V
O

Latvia 
Czech Republic 
Hungary 
Greece 
Bulgaria

Hungary

Bulgaria

David House (Budapest): operational offi ce

Shumen Plaza: pipeline project

The Company owns an offi ce building located on Andrássy 

Boulevard, a prestigious location and one of the most sought-

Plaza has purchased a 26,000m2 plot of land in Shumen, one of the 
largest cities in north-eastern Bulgaria, 80km from Varna. The site is 

after streets in the center of Budapest. Several foreign embassies 

ideally situated at the crossroads of the two major traffi c arteries in 

are situated nearby. The building facades of all buildings on the 

Shumen, within a short walking distance to the city center, railway 

Andrássy Boulevard, including David House, are listed in the “World 

station and university.

Heritage” list. The building was reconstructed / refurbished by 

Plaza during 2000-2001 in cooperation with the local monument 

preservation authority. Many of the original features have been 

Shumen Plaza is expected to be the fi rst western-style shopping 
center in the district and to serve the city population of approximately 

retained, including the inner courtyard, staircases, stucco, ornate 

100,000 people and a larger catchment of 205,000 people. Shumen 

metalwork and fi ne wood carvings. The building is located on a 
800m2 plot and consists of four fl oors, an atrium and a basement, 
with a total constructed area of approximately 2,000m2. 

Plaza is planned to be a three-fl oor commercial and entertainment 
center with 20,000m2 GLA and 650 parking spaces. The project is 
under planning and feasibility examination.

Arena Plaza extension (Budapest): pipeline project

The Arena Plaza extension is a planned offi ce addition to Arena Plaza 
that is intended to comprise approximately 40,000m2 GLA of “class 
A” offi ces. The Arena Plaza extension will occupy part of the former 
historic Kerepesi trotting track in the 8th district of Budapest. The 
project is under planning and feasibility examination.

Greece

Pireas Plaza (Athens): pipeline project

Plaza currently owns a plot of approximately 15,000m2 in the city 
of Piraeus, a commercial-industrial center 10km from the heart of 

Athens. The site has an ideal highly visible and commercial position 

at the junction of two of the biggest arteries in Attica: National 

Highway, running from the north to the south of Greece and Piraeus 

Avenue, connecting the center of Athens with the port of Piraeus. 

Conveniently located in front of the ISAP metro line, bus stations 

and in a walking distance from Europe’s largest passenger port, the 

project will be easily accessed by a large catchment of more than 

one million people. Pireas Plaza is planned to be a three-storey 
commercial and entertainment center with 26,000m2 GLA and will be 
served by four underground parking levels for 775 cars. The project 

is under planning and feasibility examination. 

28

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

Arena Plaza extension, Hungary

Shumen Plaza, Bulgaria

O
V
E
R
V

I

E
W

Pireas
Plaza 
Greece

26,000m2
GLA

Plaza owns a plot of approximately 15,000m2 in the city 
of Piraeus, a commercial-industrial center 10km from the 

heart of Athens, in a walking distance from Europe’s largest 

passenger port. Pireas Plaza is planned to be a three-storey 
commercial and entertainment center with 26,000m2 GLA 
and will be served by four underground parking levels for 

775 cars, easily accessed by a large catchment of more 

than one million people.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

29

W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

President and 
Chief Executive 
Offi cer’s 
statement

Ran Shtarkman
President and Chief Executive Offi cer

I am pleased to report that we are making 
good progress with the restructuring process 
whilst continuing to leverage the ability and 
expertise of our management team to enhance 
the quality of our income generating assets 
across all key parameters such as occupancy 
levels, footfall and turnover.

Central and Eastern Europe economies are experiencing signs of 

a change in sentiment, with Poland and the Czech Republic both 

reporting increased investment activity in 2013. However, we have 

seen marked differences between the countries north of the region, 

which have proved more resilient, and the struggling southern 

economies, including Romania and Bulgaria. It was as a result of 

the sustained challenging market conditions, combined with the 

lack of transactional liquidity in a number of the countries in which 

we operate, that we took the decision in November to withhold 

payments on the upcoming maturities of our outstanding corporate 

bonds and suggest a restructuring plan to creditors. 

•  In October, a consortium of shareholders of Dream Island, in 

which Plaza holds a 43.5% stake, completed the sale of its Dream 

Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa €16.5 

million (HUF 5 billion). The proceeds of the transaction were 

used by the Consortium to repay a proportion of the securitised 

related bank debt held against the asset. As a result of a previous 

non-cash, market driven writedown, the asset was held on Plaza’s 

balance sheet at the value of the loan, which was non-recourse so 

no accounting loss was incurred in the 2013 fi nancial statements.

•  On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an 

agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and 

offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction 

of certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at 

circa €40 million, the asset’s current book value. Following the 

repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza expects to 

generate aggregate cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling 

circa €18 million, before taxes and transaction costs, which 

should be paid in instalments over the coming two years. The 

transaction is subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions, including 

consent from the fi nancing banks.

Against these specifi c and very real challenges, I am pleased to 

•  As announced in January 2014, in December, Plaza’s 70% 

report that Plaza has, once again, been successful in delivering 

subsidiary reached an agreement to sell its 50% equity stake 

considerable progress at the operational level of the business 

(together with the other 50% joint venture partner) in the Új 

through intensive asset management initiatives such as attracting 

Udvar shopping mall in Budapest, Hungary. As a result of the 

signifi cant anchor tenants to our assets. We have also continued to 

transaction, proceeds of €2.35 million in cash were received by 

reallocate capital to pay our debts following the sale of a number of 

Plaza for its share in the asset.

our completed and non-core assets.

Key Events

In line with its stated strategy, Plaza made a number of signifi cant 

disposals of its non-core assets during the year, including:

•  In May, Plaza sold its 50% stake in a vehicle which primarily 

holds interest in an offi ce complex located in Pune, Maharashtra. 

The successful transaction valued assets owned by the vehicle 

collectively at €33.4 million and, as a result, Plaza received gross 

proceeds of circa €16.7 million.

•  Finally, Plaza has also sold its interest in a SPV which owns a site 

in Roztoky, Czech Republic which was being held for a potential 

residential development. The site was sold for circa €2 million, 

resulting in net cash proceeds of €1.3 million after debt-related 

deductions.

These transactions are demonstrative of the Company’s ability to 

continue to deliver on its strategy to reduce debt levels and reassign 

capital realised from the sale of completed and non-core assets to 

pay down debt and invest in the core yielding assets in its portfolio, 

•  In July, Plaza successfully completed the sale of 100% of its 

thereby creating capital value and driving income growth.

stake in a vehicle which owns the interest in the Prague 3 project 

(“Prague 3”), a logistics and commercial center in the third 

In addition, the Company continues to make strong progress with 

district of Prague. The transaction valued the asset at circa €11.1 

its asset management initiatives. Occupancy levels across the 

million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other 

Company’s existing shopping and entertainment centers continued 

balance sheet adjustments, Plaza received net proceeds of circa 

to increase, reaching an overall occupancy of 93%, footfall increased 

€7.6 million in cash. 

by 4% and the average monthly turnover increased by 24.5%. 

30

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
B
U
S

I

N
E
S
S

R
E
V

I

E
W

In addition an important refi nancing agreement was signed during 

Net Asset Value per share decreased by 40%, attributable primarily 

the year, with the Company’s Latvian 50% subsidiary signing a new 

to non-cash impairments amounting to €186 million. The writedown 

€59.3 million investment loan with a consortium comprising two 

in value refl ects uncertainties in respect of the development of 

banks for its shopping and entertainment center in Riga, Latvia. The 

projects, depressed rental levels in the above mentioned countries 

new facility has duration of four years and therefore substantially 

and low transaction volumes resulting from a constrained supply 

lengthens the duration of the debt compared to the previous loan 

of debt. The majority of written down assets comprise land with 

facility, which was due for repayment on 30 June 2014.

associated planning consent, which management continues to 

Results 

Due to a circa €186 million non-cash impairment charged against 

the Company’s trading properties, equity accounted investees, 

investment property and prepayments, Plaza ended the year with a 

loss attributable to the owners of the Company of €218 million. A 

value at the lower of cost or net realisable value. Management 

will continue to evaluate the local economic context before any 

development programme is commenced as well as looking at 

other alternatives to monetise the land bank if development is not 

economically viable. 

The Company’s NAV was calculated as follows:

€186 million impairment charge related to the reduction in the value 

of our assets across the portfolio with the following geographic 

Use 

EUR (Thousand)

breakdown: Serbia (€37 million), Romania (€27 million), India 

Market value of land and projects by Cushman and Wakefi eld1  545,142

(€76 million), Czech Republic (€20 million), Greece (€12 million), 

Poland (€11 million), Bulgaria and Hungary (€4.5 million) and Latvia 

(€1.5 million uplift). The writedowns are a refl ection of the ongoing 

economic uncertainty in many of the countries in which we operate.

As part of the Company’s commitment to repositioning the business, 

Plaza raised €61 million through the successful disposal of fi ve 

assets, which included receiving the remaining funds from the 

Assets minus liabilities as at 31 December 20132 

Total 

(271,370)

273,772

1  Except for Targu Mures (Romania) project, where the company has applied a more 

conservative value.

2  Excluding book value of assets which were valued by Cushman and Wakefi eld.

Portfolio progress

€1.428 billon US transaction the Company completed in 2012. The 

Currently the Company is engaged in twenty development projects 

2013 NOI including equity accounted from Riga Plaza totalled €17 

and owns seven operational shopping and entertainment center 

million (31 December 2012: €16.2 million).

assets and two offi ce schemes, located across the Central and 

Eastern European region and in India. The location of the projects, 

As at 31 December 2013, Plaza had a consolidated cash position 

as at 13 March 2014, is summarized as follows: 

(including restricted bank deposits, short-term deposits and 

available for sale fi nancial assets) of approximately €33.7 million, 

Number of assets (CEE and India)

Location 

Active 

under development/  

Offi ces

planning

of which circa €7 million of cash was held as restricted cash on a 

consolidated basis. Working capital stood at negative €291 million 

as all the liabilities are shown as current due to the implementation 

of the restructuring programme, the subsequent suspension of 

payments and the classifi cation of trading properties as non-current 

Romania 

India 

due to the uncertainties surrounding the timing of the restructuring’s 

Poland 

completion and the future disposal of a number of assets. As at the 

date of this report, the Company has a current cash position of circa 

€35.2 million (inclusive of the €7 million of restricted cash).

NAV 

The Company’s property portfolio (CEE and India) was valued by 

Cushman and Wakefi eld as at 31 December 2013 and their summary 

valuation is shown below.

Hungary 

Serbia 

Czech Republic 

Bulgaria 

Greece 

Latvia 

Total 

- 

1 

3 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

1 

7 

9 

2 

4 

1 

2 

- 

1 

1 

- 

20 

1

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

2

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

31

 
 
 
 
W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

Liquidity & Financing

Plaza ended the year with a consolidated cash position (including 

restricted bank deposits, short-term deposits and available for sale 

fi nancial assets) of approximately €33.7 million, of which circa €7 

million of cash is held as restricted cash on a consolidated basis. 

Working capital as at 31 December 2013 totalled negative €291 

million, and, as mentioned above, the Company’s current cash 

position is circa €35.2 million (out of which €7 million is restricted).

Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during 

the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the 

period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to 

64% in 2013. 

On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had made the 

decision to withhold material payments to bondholders, specifi cally 

a circa €15 million payment due to Polish bondholders on 18 

November 2013 and a circa €17 million payment due to Israeli 

bondholders on 31 December 2013. Despite ongoing efforts to 

complete a number of asset sales and secure some alternative 

fi nancing transactions, Plaza had been unable to conclude these 

deals within a timeframe that would have enabled it to meet those 

payment obligations. 

Aside from the proposed payment deferral, the terms of the 

proposed restructuring plan do not require bondholders to take a 

loss on the value of their outstanding exposures. The original date 

of the creditors voting, scheduled for 17 April 2014, was postponed 

to 26 June 2014 due to the technicalities involved in formally 

completing the arrangement. Please refer to the Debt restructuring 

page under Investor relations section on the Company’s website for 

further details.

Strategy and Outlook

During the year, Plaza continued to be impacted by the lasting 

economic uncertainty across CEE. Whilst fi nancial institutions in 

the region remain well fi nanced, they continue to take a cautious 

approach to lending and investors continue to be wary of moving 

up the risk curve, both factors which are illustrated by the lack of 

transactional activity in 2013. 

In the shopping mall space, the core economies are well serviced 

with retail and entertainment centers, so we continue to see value 

in the region’s secondary cities. For this reason, as signs of an 

improvement in business and investor sentiment across CEE 

become even more apparent, our portfolio should be particularly 

well positioned to benefi t from wider recovery in Eurozone growth. 

Therefore, to ensure the long-term viability of the business, the 

Board agreed to approach the creditors of the Company with a 

restructuring plan so that a formalized restructuring process could 

be implemented. Subsequently, on 18 November, Plaza fi led for 

reorganization proceedings (surseance van betaling) with the 

District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and submitted a 

restructuring plan to enable it to restructure its debt and resolve its 

immediate liquidity situation. This will be achieved primarily through:

•  a deferral of principal payment obligations to creditors of the 

Company for a period of three to four years, or shorter if cash 

fl ow permits;

Notwithstanding the challenges that remain and the Company’s 

current liquidity position, Plaza’s efforts to reposition the business 

resulted in fi ve signifi cant sales of non-core assets and securing 

increased occupancy levels, footfall and turnover across its portfolio 

of operating assets. The success of the Company’s intensive 

asset management initiatives, which have driven these operational 

achievements, are extremely important in maximizing the income 

and value of our shopping centers, particularly in the context of the 

future implementation of the restructuring plan.

Alongside the management of the restructuring process, which 

continues to make good progress, it is vital that Plaza continues 

•  interest payments made as due, with an additional 1.5% interest 

to look to the long-term objectives of the business. The deferral of 

to be paid in addition to regular interest;

the repayment of our debt maturities enables us to progress with 

•  early repayment of the Company’s debt balance upon the 

the initiation of projects and investment as appropriate, including 

realization or refi nancing of assets with 75% of the net cash 

actively managing our income generating assets to prepare for their 

fl ows;

•  allocation to the representatives of the non-collateral backed debt 

being shares issued representing 13.5% of the Company’s shares;

•  as long as the deferred debt balance is not paid in full, no 

dividend will be distributed without the majority bondholders’ 

consent;

•  a potential rights issue of €20 million to shareholders;

•  a negative pledge on Company’s assets;

ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify exit opportunities from 

our remaining non-core assets. 

Despite our challenged liquidity position and restructuring process, 

our belief in the strength of the underlying fundamentals of our 

assets and land reserves remains intact. By utilising the extensive 

skills of our experienced management team, the deep relationships 

we have with our tenants and fi nance providers and maintaining our 

cautious but opportunistic approach, the Company is positioning 

itself, on completion of the restructuring, to be able to return 

•  a deferral of banks’ recourse rights to the Company for 

the rewards of capital appreciation and income growth to its 

a further four years.

shareholders.

Ran Shtarkman

President and Chief Executive Offi cer

32

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
B
U
S

I

N
E
S
S

R
E
V

I

E
W

Operational 
review

During the reporting period, Plaza made signifi cant progress against 

As of the reporting date, Plaza has 29 assets in nine countries, of 

its operational and strategic objectives, by delivering improved 

which 20 are under various stages of development across the CEE 

fundamentals at the portfolio level and realising value through the 

region and India. Of these, nine are located in Romania, two in India, 

sale of a number of its non-core assets.

four in Poland, two in Serbia, and single assets in Bulgaria, Greece 

Highlights for the fi nancial year included:

and Hungary. In addition to these developments, Plaza retains 

the ownership of and operates seven shopping and entertainment 

•  Operations: Improving performance of its operating shopping and 

centers in Poland, Czech Republic, Serbia, India and Latvia and two 

entertainment centers located in four countries in the CEE.

offi ce buildings in Budapest and Bucharest.

•  Disposals: In 2013, the Company received net cash of circa €61 
million through the disposal of fi ve assets (€29 million) and the 

collection of the remaining proceeds from the transaction in the 

US (€32 million).

The development projects are at various stages of the development 

cycle, from the landholdings through to the planning and permits.

The Company’s current assets and pipeline projects are summarised 

•  Financial position: Plaza’s current consolidated cash position 

in the table below:

stands at circa €35.2 million (out of which €7 million is restricted).

Asset/Project 

Location 

Nature of asset 

Size  
m2 
(GLA) 

Status *

Plaza’s 

effective

ownership %

  Operating Shopping and Entertainment Centers

  Suwałki Plaza 

Suwałki,  

Poland 

Retail &  

20,000 

100 

Operating, opened in

entertainment scheme  

May 2010

  Zgorzelec Plaza 

Zgorzelec,  

Retail &  

13,000 

100 

Operating, opened in  

Poland 

entertainment scheme  

March 2010

  Torun´ Plaza 

Torun´,  

Poland 

Retail &  

40,000 

100 

Operating, opened in 

entertainment scheme  

November 2011

  Liberec Plaza 

Liberec,  

Retail &  

17,000 

100 

Operating, opened in 

Czech Rep. 

entertainment scheme  

March 2009

  Kragujevac Plaza 

Kragujevac, 

Retail &  

22,000 

100 

Operating, opened in 

Serbia 

entertainment scheme  

March 2012

  Riga Plaza 

Riga, 

Latvia 

Retail &  

49,000 

50 

Operating; opened in 

entertainment scheme 

March, 2009

  Koregaon Park Plaza 

Pune, 

Retail, entertainment 

41,000  

100 

Operating; opened in  

India 

and offi ce scheme  

March, 2012. In November  

2013 the Company reached an 

agreement to sell the center, 

subject to certain conditions

*   All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

plaza centers/business 

ope

Asset/Project 

Location 

Nature of asset 

Size  
m2 
(GLA) 

Status *

Plaza’s 

effective

ownership %

  Development Assets

  Casa Radio 

Bucharest,  

Mixed-use retail 

555,000 

75 

Under planning; completion 

Romania 

and leisure plus 

offi ce scheme 

(GBA including 

parking spaces) 

of the fi rst phase is 

scheduled for 2017 

  Timis¸oara Plaza 

Timis¸oara, 

Retail &  

38,000 

100 

Construction scheduled

Romania 

entertainment scheme 

  Łódz´  Plaza 

Łódz´ ,  

Poland 

Retail &  

35,000 

100 

entertainment scheme  

to commence in 2014/5; 

completion scheduled for 2016

Construction scheduled  

to commence in 2015/6; 

completion scheduled for 2017

  Belgrade Plaza 

Belgrade, 

Apartment-hotel and 

  (MUP) 

Serbia 

business center with  

63,000 

(GBA) 

a shopping gallery 

100 

Construction scheduled

to commence in 2015/6; 

completion scheduled for 2017

  Belgrade Plaza  

Belgrade, 

Retail & 

32,000 

100 

Construction scheduled

  (Visnjicka ) 

Serbia 

entertainment scheme 

to commence in 2014/5; 

completion scheduled 

for 2015/6

  Cina Plaza 

Bucharest,  

Retail & Offi ce scheme 

4,786 

Lease rights 

Construction scheduled

Romania  

(Existing building for  

for 43 years 

to commence in 2014; 

development) 

(starting 

12/2007)

completion scheduled

  Chennai 

Chennai,  

Residential scheme  

230,000 

40 

Construction scheduled 

India 

(for sale)  

to commence in late 2014/5; 

phased completion scheduled 

over 2014/5-2018/9

  Operational Offi ce Buildings

  David House 

Budapest,  

Offi ce 

2,000 

100 

Operational offi ce

Hungary

Palazzo Ducale 

Bucharest, 

Offi ce 

700 

100 

Operational offi ce

Romania 

*   All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.

34

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
rewiew

rational rewiew

B
U
S

I

N
E
S
S

R
E
V

I

E
W

Asset/Project 

Location 

Nature of asset 

Size  
m2 
(GLA) 

Status *

Plaza’s 

effective

ownership %

Plot Size (m2)

Pipeline Projects 

  Kielce Plaza 

Leszno Plaza 

Łódz´  (Residential) 

Kielce, 

Poland 

Leszno, 

Poland 

Łódz´ ,  

Poland  

Retail & 

30,000 

100 

Under planning and

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Retail &  

17,000 

100 

Under planning and

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Residential scheme 

33,000 

100 

Under planning and  

feasibility examination

Arena Plaza 

extension 

Budapest,  

Offi ce scheme 

22,000 

100 

Under planning and Extension 

Hungary  

(land use right)    

feasibility examination 

Csíki Plaza 

Miercurea Ciuc,  Retail & 

36,500 

100 

Under planning and

Romania 

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Ias¸i Plaza 

Ias¸i, 

Retail, entertainment 

46,500 

100 

Under planning and

Romania 

and offi ce scheme 

feasibility examination

Slatina Plaza 

Slatina, 

Romania 

Retail & 

24,000 

100 

Under planning and

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Hunedoara Plaza 

Hunedoara, 

Retail & 

41,000 

100 

Under planning and

Romania 

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Târgu Mures¸ Plaza 

Târgu Mures¸, 

Retail & entertainment 

31,500 

100 

Under planning and

Romania 

scheme (Power Center) 

feasibility examination 

Constant¸a Plaza 

Constant¸a, 

Retail &  

26,500 

100 

Under planning and

Romania 

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Shumen Plaza 

Pireas Plaza 

Shumen, 

Bulgaria 

Athens,  

Greece 

Retail & 

26,000 

100 

Under planning and

entertainment scheme 

feasibility examination

Retail &  

15,000 

100 

entertainment scheme 

Bangalore 

Bangalore,  

Residential Scheme 

218,500  

25 

India 

*   All completion dates of the projects are subject to securing external fi nancing and securing suffi cient tenant’s demand.

Under planning and 

feasibility examination

Under planning and  

feasibility examination

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

plaza centers/business 

ope

Details of these activities by country are as follows:

Serbia

Poland 

Plaza owns and operates three completed shopping and 

entertainment centers across Poland. During the year, each of the 

centers have delivered notable asset management success, 
including new signed leases totalling over 6,800m2, improving the 
overall occupancy of the Polish portfolio to 90%.

Torun´ Plaza, which was completed and opened in late 2011, 
comprises approximately 40,000m2 of GLA and represents 
Plaza’s tenth completed center in Poland. Occupancy has risen to 

approximately 89% (including signed lease agreements) compared 

to 84% in 2012. Following the year end, TK Maxx opened as an 
anchor retailer on 5 March 2014 occupying 2,700m2. The center 
is currently let to premium international and local brands such as 

Cinema City, H&M, C&A, KappAhl, Zara, Bershka, Stradivarius, Pull 

& Bear and Massimo Dutti.

The mall demonstrated a strong operational performance over 2013, 

and Plaza’s focus on asset management and marketing activities 

since the mall opened led to a footfall improvement of 5% in 2013. 

As a result, average monthly turnover at the mall over the 2013 

Christmas period improved by 24% compared to the same period 

last year.

Suwałki Plaza, comprising approximately 20,000m2 of GLA and 
including tenants such as H&M, Rossmann, New Yorker, KappAhl 

and Cinema Lumière, continues to perform well. Plaza has been 

successful at driving the turnover at the center, with an average 

increase of 10% compared to 2012. Successful asset management 

initiatives undertaken by Plaza saw occupancy improve from 90% to 

91% during the year.

Signifi cant operational improvement was also achieved at Zgorzelec 
Plaza. The 13,000m2 shopping and entertainment center saw 
occupancy levels rise from 89% in 2012 to 91% as at the reporting 

date. In addition, footfall in the center increased by 29% compared 

to 2012 and the center achieved a 58% growth in turnover on year 

to year basis.

Plaza also continued the feasibility and planning studies at Łódz´ 
Plaza (comprising approximately 35,000m2 of GLA). As a result, 
construction is scheduled to begin in late 2015 with completion 

expected in 2017.

On 20 March 2012, Plaza opened its fi rst Serbian shopping and 

entertainment center in Kragujevac, a city of 180,000 inhabitants. 
Kragujevac Plaza comprises 22,000m2 of GLA and was over 90% 
let on opening to tenants including Nike, Adidas, Aldo, New Yorker, 

Deichmann, TerraNova, Fashion and Friends, H&O, Oviesse, Fox, 

Chicco and Home Center. As at the reporting date, the center is fully 

let with signifi cant improvements both in terms of footfall (+15%) 

and turnover (+17%), demonstrating Plaza’s ability to capitalise on 

opportunities in new markets. 

Kragujevac Plaza is the fi rst western-style shopping center to be 

completed outside of Belgrade, and enjoys a catchment area of 

approximately 590,000 inhabitants within a 30 minute car journey 

of the center. The center has a six-screen Cineplexx cinema facility 

which is the only cinema and bowling facility in the region.

Plaza’s other investment in Serbia is a state-owned plot and building 

in Belgrade, which Plaza secured in a competitive tender. The 

building was formerly occupied by the Federal Ministry of Internal 

Affairs of the former Yugoslavia and is located in the center of 

Belgrade in a neighbourhood of government offi ces and foreign 

embassies. On completion, the scheme, Belgrade (MUP) Plaza, 

will comprise a shopping gallery, an apartment-hotel and business 
center totalling circa 63,000m2 of GBA. Construction is planned to 
commence in 2015/2016 and scheduled for completion in 2017. 

The project is currently in the process of securing the relevant local 

planning and permitting approvals.

The Company also owns a plot of land in Belgrade which will be 

developed into a shopping and entertainment center. Concept 

designs have been submitted and approved (location permit granted) 

for Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) (previously known under the project 

name Sport Star Plaza), Plaza’s proposed scheme comprising a 
total GLA of approximately 32,000m2. Construction is planned to 
commence during 2014/2015 with anticipated completion scheduled 

for 2015/2016. 

On 1 March 2013, Serbia was granted candidate status to the 

European Union. Plaza believes this will signifi cantly increase the 

fl ow of international capital into the country, enabling its carefully 

selected Serbian development pipeline, and completed and 

operational asset to benefi t from an anticipated growth in investor 

interest.

36

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
rewiew

rational rewiew

B
U
S

I

N
E
S
S

R
E
V

I

E
W

Romania

Plaza holds a 75% interest in a company in partnership with the 

Government of Romania to develop Casa Radio project (Dambovit¸a), 

the largest development plot in central Bucharest. It will comprise 
approximately 555,000m2 of GBA, including a 76,000m2 GLA 
shopping mall and leisure center (one of the largest in CEE), offi ces, 

hotel, an apartment hotel and a convention and conference hall. The 

Company has obtained the Detailed Urban Permit (“PUD”) and the 

Zonal Urban Plan (“PUZ”) to the Dambovit¸a Center Multifunctional 

Complex and completion of the fi rst phase is scheduled for 

2016/2017.

In light of the fi nancial crisis, and in order to insure a construction 

process that is aligned to current market conditions, the Company 

started preliminary discussions with the Authorities (which are 

both shareholders of the SPV and a party to the Public Private 

Partnership (“PPP”) regarding the future development of the project. 

The Company has also offi cially notifi ed the Authorities that it will be 

seeking to redefi ne some of the terms of the existing PPP contract, 

such as timetable, structure and project milestones.

In addition, Plaza continued the feasibility and planning studies and 
permitting of Timis¸oara Plaza (comprising approximately 38,000m2 
of GLA) and Cina in Bucharest Romania. At Timis¸oara Plaza, 

construction is scheduled to begin in late 2014 with completion 

expected in 2016. The Cina retail and offi ce scheme will comprise 
app. 4,800m2 GLA with an expected completion date in 2015/2016.

India

On 14 November 2013, Plaza announced that it had reached an 

agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail, entertainment and 

offi ce scheme located in Pune, India, subject to the satisfaction of 

certain closing conditions. The transaction valued the asset at €40 

million, the asset’s current book value. Following the repayment 

of the outstanding related bank loan, Plaza will receive aggregate 

net cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling circa €16 million 

(after tax and transaction costs). Subject to fulfi lment of certain 

conditions, including a consent from the fi nancing bank, the 

Company expects to collect the fi rst part of this, totalling circa 

€10m, in the coming six months and the remaining consideration 

will then follow in several instalments until 2016.

a 47.5% stake in Elbit India Real Estate Holding Limited, which 

already owned stakes of between 50% and 80% in three mixed-use 

projects in India, in conjunction with local Indian partners. This joint 

venture’s voting rights are split 50:50 between Elbit and Plaza. 

These three projects are as follows:

Bangalore - This residential project, owned in an equal share 
between the JV and a prominent local developer, is located on the 

eastern side of Bangalore, India’s fi fth largest city with a population 

of more than eight million inhabitants. With a total built area of over 
310,000m2, it will comprise over 1,100 luxury residential units when 
completed. In 2010, the JV signed a new framework agreement 

which, inter alia, entitles the JV to receive 70% of the net proceeds 

from the project until a target 20% IRR is received. Once the JV has 

received the 20% IRR on its investment, the JV will exit the project. 

Currently the project is in planning phase. As at 31 December 2013, 

due to uncertainty about the Group’s ability to develop the project in 

the foreseeable future, the Group recorded €31 million of writedown 

expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss for the year.

Chennai - A residential development, which is 80% owned by the 
JV and 20% by a prominent local developer. The scheme will be 

developed into a residential project consisting of approximately 
160,000m2 of plotted area for development and approximately 
70,000m2 for high quality villas. Chennai is India’s fourth largest 
city with a population of more than eight million inhabitants. The 

JV is currently in advanced negotiations to sign a joint development 

agreement with a reputable local developer to complete the project. 

As at 31 December, due to uncertainty about the Group’s ability to 

develop the project in the foreseeable future, the Group estimated 

the net realizable value of the project according to a comparable 

model. This resulted in the Group recording €20.7 million of 

writedown expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.

Kochi Island - A 50:50 partnership with a local developer, this 
mixed-use project will comprise more than 575,000m2 of high-
end residential apartment buildings, offi ce complexes, a hotel and 

serviced apartments complex, retail area and a marina. It is located 

on a backwater island adjacent to the administrative, commercial and 

retail hub of the city of Kochi, in the state of Kerala. Kochi has a local 

population of more than two million inhabitants. 

In 2008, Plaza formed a joint venture with Elbit Imaging (“JV”) to 

develop three mega mixed-use projects in Bangalore, Chennai and 

Kochi in India. Under the terms of the agreement Plaza acquired 

Plaza’s investment in Kochi project (€4.3 million) was done through 

a pre-payment advance guaranteed by Elbit, its parent company.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

37

 
W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

On 11 November 2013, the Company demanded and exercised a 

corporate guarantee in the amount of €4.3 million including the 

Hungary

Plaza has a transferable land use right to plot of land on which it 

plans to develop an offi ce extension onto the Arena Plaza shopping 

center built by the Company. The extension will comprise an offi ce 
complex with approximately 40,000m2 of GLA. In line with Plaza’s 
cautious approach to development, it is waiting for the recovery of 

the Budapest offi ce market and a general rise in both occupancy 

rates and rental fee levels before beginning construction of the 

project. 

The Group continues to own its offi ce building, David House on 

Andrássy Boulevard, in Budapest.

Greece

Plaza owns a land plot which received the relevant planning 
permission for a 26,000m2 GLA shopping and entertainment center. 
Although the land plot is in an excellent location, in line with the 

Company’s prudent approach to development, Plaza will continue to 

monitor the macroeconomic situation in Greece before committing 

additional capital to the project. 

interest thereon up until such date (the “Reimbursement Payment”) 

which has been provided by Elbit within the terms of the original 

Indian JV Agreement, on the grounds of Elbit defaulting on the 

fi nalisation and conclusion of the transfer of the Kochi Project Rights 

to the Indian JV Vehicle.

In its reply letter, Elbit has refused to repay the Reimbursement 

Payment. The Company is of the view that based on the 

abovementioned JV Agreement and its ancillary documents 

(including the corporate guarantee issued by EIbit in the Company’s 

favour as mentioned above), it has a valid claim to recover the €4.3 

million. 

Despite the above view, and in view of uncertainties, the Company 

has made the decision to impair the pre-payment in its fi nancials.

Latvia

In March 2009, Plaza completed and opened Riga Plaza, the 
49,000m2 shopping and entertainment center in which Plaza owns a 
50% stake. 

Riga Plaza is located on the western bank of the River Daugava 

by the Sala Bridge. The center continues to deliver signifi cant 

operational improvements, seeing occupancy levels increase to 97% 

following the lease agreement signed with H&M which has opened 
a 2,700m2 store in April 2014. There are ongoing discussions with a 
number of potential occupiers for the remaining space from which 

Plaza hopes to conclude further lettings shortly. Also footfall and 

turnover improved throughout the year by 7% and 14% respectively.

Latvia was the fastest growing economy in the EU in 2012. Following 

the successful introduction of the Euro in 2013 and strengthening 

household consumption, the country is well positioned for further 

growth, which we expect to underpin the further improvements in 

the performance of Riga Plaza going forward.

Czech Republic

Plaza continues to own and manage Liberec Plaza shopping and 
entertainment center (approximately 17,000m2 GLA), which opened 
in March 2009. During the period, the turnover of the mall improved 

by 10%, whilst occupancy increased from 80% to 86%.

38

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
Plaza has been successful 
in delivering considerable progress at 
the operational level of the business 
through intensive asset management 
initiatives such as attracting 
signifi cant anchor tenants 
to its assets.

Liberec Plaza, Czech Republic

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

39

W
E

I

V
E
R

S
S
E
N

I

S
U
B

Financial
review 

Roy Linden
Chief Financial Offi cer

Results

During 2013, Plaza remained focused on the execution of its 

strategy to dispose of non-core assets in its portfolio, to enable it 

to reallocate capital to its core yielding assets and to reduce debt 

levels.

The cost of operation of active malls remained at the same level 

despite increasing rental income (€9.4 million in both 2012 and 

2013). The cost of marketing expenses were classifi ed as part of 

operating cost rather than administrative expenses, and comparative 

fi gures for 2012 were also restated. The cost of the Fantasy Park 

operations (operation of entertainment centers) also decreased 

from €8.3 million in 2012 to €4 million in 2013 after the closures 

The Company has designated its properties into three types:

mentioned above.

•  Completed trading properties projects;

•  Projects scheduled for construction;

•  Plots in the planning phase. 

In respect of its completed trading properties projects, the Company 

still faces material uncertainties in respect of the time needed to sell 

the properties. However the Company has not changed its business 

model and is actively seeking buyers. Therefore it is clear from the 

Company’s perspective that these completed properties are trading 

properties, rather than investment properties.

In respect of plots held, which are not intended to be constructed 

in the near future, the Company is actively looking for buyers and 

does not hold the plots passively with the intention to gain from 

a potential value increase. Plots scheduled for construction are 

intended to be developed and sold in the normal course of business 

once circumstances allow. For this reason we also believe that these 

are appropriately classifi ed as trading properties. As at 31 December 

2013, the trading properties were classifi ed as non-current assets 

in the Statement of Financial Position, except for Koregaon Park, 

India, for which a sale purchase agreement was signed during the 

reporting period.

As a result of IFRS 11, the Group has changed its accounting policy 

for its interests in joint arrangements. Under IFRS 11, the Group 

has classifi ed its interests in joint arrangements as Equity accounted 

investees. The balances of 2012 have been restated in the fi nancial 

statements. The main change was the reclassifi cation of the Indian 
residential JV projects and Riga Plaza (Latvia) to equity accounted investees. 

Income comprised rental income from operating shopping centers: 

In 2013, Plaza generated €23.7 million of income compared to 

€23.1 million in 2012. The rental income performance would have 

been even stronger, had there not been a loss of income caused 

by a fi re incident in India. However, income from the Group’s 

Fantasy Park operation which provides gaming and entertainment 

services in Plaza’s active shopping centers decreased to €3.3 million 

from €6.9 million in 2012 following the closure of a number of 

underperforming units.

Writedown of trading properties amounted to €118 million in 2013 

(€60 million in 2012). This amount is attributable mainly to projects 

in Serbia (€37 million), Romania (€24.6 million), India (€15.6 

million), Czech Republic (€15 million), Greece (€12 million), Poland 

(€11 million) and Bulgaria (€2.4 million). 

As mentioned above, in accordance with IFRS 11, the Group has 

changed its accounting policy regarding joint arrangement. Joint 

ventures are classifi ed as equity accounted investments. 

The writedown in connection to those assets amounted to €56 

million in 2013 and €23 million in 2012. More than 90% of the 

writedown relates to Plaza’s Indian projects (Bangalore, Chennai and 

Kharadi). This was slightly offset by the €1.5 million increase in the 

value of Riga Plaza (Latvia).

Administrative expenses amounted to €9.4 million (2012: €11.4 

million after restatement) an 18% decrease as a result of a decrease 

in payroll and employee related expenses as part of the Company’s 

efforts to reduce costs during the year.

Other expense increased from €1 million in 2012 to €11.5 million in 

2013, due to the impairment of certain prepayments and fair value 

adjustment of investment property.

Restructuring costs were incurred in connection with the Company’s 

debt restructuring process.

A net fi nance loss of €39.3 million was recorded in 2013 compared 

to a net fi nance cost of €17.2 million in 2012.

Finance income decreased to €1.3 million from €20.4 million in 

2012 mainly due to no income being recorded in connection to its 

buyback programme (2012: €4.3 million income) as the Company 

ceased this activity in order to preserve short-term liquidity. In 

addition, no income resulted from hedging activity through selling 

currency options (2012: €11.7 million) as hedging activity was 

reduced also in order to preserve short-term liquidity. 

40

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
B
U
S

I

N
E
S
S

R
E
V

I

E
W

Finance expenses increased from €37.5 million to €40.6 million 

Plaza has on its balance sheet a €40 million investment in equity 

(after capitalization of borrowing costs of €6.5 million in 2013 and 

accounted investees which includes a joint venture project 

€19.1 million in 2012). The main reasons for this increase were: 

reclassifi ed in accordance with IFRS 11. The only operating asset 

•  discontinuing of capitalization of interest on debentures in H2 

currently classifi ed under this heading is Riga Plaza. The value has 

2013, resulting in an additional €3 million of expenses being 

decreased from the 2012 fi gure of €161.7 mainly as result of the 

refl ected in the profi t or loss;

dissolution of the US holding entity (totalling €32 million), disposals 

•  loss on the reissuance of bonds previously bought back (2013 - 

(totalling €21 million), writedowns (totalling €56 million) and the 

€5.7 million, 2012 - nil);

effect of the changes in exchange rates (totalling €15 million).

•  increase in foreign exchange loss on bonds (2013 - €5.4 million, 

2012 - €2.0 million).

This was partly offset by the decrease in the expense recorded due to 
the increase in the fair value of bonds (2013 - €13.2 million, 2012 - €19.0 million)

Total bank borrowings (long and short-term) amounted to €175.5 

million (31 December 2012: €206 million). This decrease is primarily 

the result of loans disposed of and repaid during the year. All loans 

were accounted for as current liabilities following the suspension of 

A tax benefi t of €6.3 million recorded in the consolidated income 

payments by Plaza and the uncertainty surrounding the restructuring 

statement mainly represents the decrease in the deferred tax liability, 

plan.

primarily in connection with the fair value changes of the debentures 

measured through the profi t or loss.

Apart from bank fi nancing, Plaza has a balance sheet liability of 

€168.6 million (with an adjusted par value of circa €201.5 million, 

As a result of the above, the loss for the year amounted to circa 

including unpaid interest) from issuing debentures on the Tel 

€218 million in 2013, compared to €86.1 million in 2012. Basic and 

Aviv Stock Exchange and to Polish institutional investors. These 

diluted loss per share for 2013 was €0.73 (2012: €0.29).

debentures are presented at their fair value with the exception of the 

debentures issued from August 2009 onward, which are presented 

Balance sheet and cash fl ow

at amortised cost.

The balance sheet as at 31 December 2013 showed total assets of 

€586 million compared to total assets of €886 million at the end of 

2012. The decrease was mainly driven by the writedown of trading 

properties and equity accounted investees, as well as the disposal of 

assets and cash used for repayment of debt.

Provisions are booked in connection with the Company’s Casa Radio 

project in Bucharest Romania.

As at 31 December 2013, the net balance of the Company, with its 

controlling shareholders, is a liability of approximately €0.9 million.

The Company’s consolidated cash position (including restricted bank 

deposits, short-term deposits and held for trading fi nancial assets) 

decreased to €33.7 million (31 December 2012: €65.8 million). 

Gearing increased to 64% (31 December 2012: 50%) as a result of 

impairment losses and fi nance costs incurred during the year.

Other current liabilities have increased in 2013 from €7.6 million to 

€11.2 million. The increase is attributable to unpaid debenture and 

bank loan interest and the advance payment received in respect of 

the sale of Koregaon Park.

The value of investment property decreased from €14.5 million in 

2012 to nil in 2013, due to the sale of the Prague 3 project in the 

Czech Republic, the sole investment property at the end of the 2012.

Trading properties decreased from €612 million in 2012 to €495 

million in 2013 mainly as result of writedowns booked in the period. 

At the end of the year, excluding Koregaon Park for which a sale and 

purchase agreement was signed before year end, trading properties 

were classifi ed as non-current assets due to uncertainties about the 

development and realization dates.

The total equity decreased from the fi gure of €443 million in 2012 

to €210 million in 2013 as a result of a €14 million increase in 

the translation reserve connected to the Indian operations of the 

Company stemming from the weakening of the Indian Rupee against 

the EUR during the year (app 17% devaluation), and the €218 million 

loss suffered mainly due to the writedowns, turning the retained 

earnings of €189 million into retained losses of €29 million.

Roy Linden

Chief Financial Offi cer

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

41

 
I

E
W
C
E
N
V
A
E
N
R
R
S
E
V
S
O
E
N
G
S
D
U
N
B
A

I

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Valuation 
summary by 
Cushman and 
Wakefi eld  

as at 31 December 2013 (in EUR)1

Country 

Project name 

Market Value of 
the land and project 
31 December 2012* 

Market Value of 
 the land and project 
 31 December 2013 

Market Value 
upon completion  
 31 December 2012* 

Market Value
upon completion  

 31 December 2013

  Hungary 

  Poland 

  Czech Republic 

  Romania 

Arena Plaza extension 
Dream Island 
David House 
Új Udvar Shopping Center 

Torun´ Plaza 
Zgorzelec Plaza 
Suwałki Plaza 
Łódz´  (Residential) 
Łódz´  Plaza 
Leszno Plaza 
Kielce Plaza 

Prague 3 
Liberec Plaza 
Roztoky 

Palazzo Ducale 
Casa Radio Plaza 
Timis¸oara Plaza 
Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc) 
Târgu Mures¸ 
Hunedoara Plaza 
Slatina Plaza 
Ias¸i Plaza 
Constant¸a Plaza 

8,500,000 
20,900,000 
4,000,000 
2,940,000 

109,600,000 
18,900,000 
46,800,000 
8,400,000 
8,600,000 
1,900,000 
4,800,000 

14,460,000 
29,400,000 
2,800,000 

1,950,000 
168,150,000 
11,000,000 
7,100,000 
6,100,000 
2,900,000 
1,800,000 
13,100,000 
10,000,000 

7,800,000 
SOLD 
3,950,000 
SOLD 

97,580,000 
17,125,000 
43,525,000 
6,500,000 
7,925,000 
1,719,000 
5,350,0003 

SOLD 
17,675,000 
SOLD 

1,800,000 
130,613,000 
10,825,000 
5,620,000 
6,175,0003 
2,375,000 
1,650,000 
11,550,000 
6,300,000 

67,842,000 
223,905,000 
4,000,000 
2,940,000 

109,600,000 
18,900,000 
46,800,000 
n/a2 
82,972,000 
26,000,000 
n/a2 

157,905,000 
29,400,000 
18,190,000 

1,950,000 
331,701,000 
68,189,000 
19,322,000 
n/a2 
n/a2 
n/a2 
93,550,000 
13,873,000 

88,941,000
SOLD
3,950,000
SOLD

97,580,000
17,125,000
43,525,000
89,331,000
74,214,000
n/a2
75,502,000

SOLD
17,675,000
SOLD

1,800,000
622,880,000
76,965,000
14,868,000
72,344,000
9,959,000
40,920,000
94,946,000
n/a2

  Latvia 

Riga Plaza 

42,350,000 

43,863,000 

42,350,000 

43,863,000

  Greece 

Pireas Plaza 

21,000,000 

15,300,000 

98,500,000 

94,555,000

India 

Koregaon Park Plaza 
Kharadi Plaza 
Trivandrum Plaza 
Bangalore 
Kochi Island 
Chennai 

55,866,000 
15,393,000 
7,330,000 
14,486,000 
5,149,000 
10,731,000 

SOLD4 
SOLD 
SOLD 
12,251,000 
n/a 
11,272,000 

67,779,000 
67,297,000 
46,779,000 
119,722,000 
n/a2 
42,701,000 

SOLD4
SOLD
SOLD
90,665,000
n/a
39,899,000

  Bulgaria 

Shumen Plaza 

4,600,000 

2,125,000 

n/a2 

31,260,000

  Serbia 

  TOTAL 

Belgrade Plaza (MUP) 
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) 
Kragujevac Plaza 

19,700,000 
20,000,000 
42,100,000 

16,150,000 
19,025,000 
41,775,000 

138,600,000 
107,159,000 
42,100,000 

145,729,000
108,309,000
41,775,000

762,805,000 

547,818,000 

2,090,026,000 

2,038,580,000

*   2012 comparatives are based on a Jones Lang LaSalle report.

1   Rounded to nearest thousand.
2   Assets were valued with the comparative sales price method, no value at completion was 

estimated.

3   In 2013 the Company applied a more conservative approach, and lower value was used 

in the fi nancial statements than in the valuation report.

4   The Company signed an agreement for the sale of Koregaon Park Plaza and therefore no 

valuation was conducted. The book value of the asset is circa €40 million.

Notes:   All values of land and project assume full planning consent for the proposed use.
Plaza Centers had a 50% interest in the Riga Plaza shopping center development. 
Plaza Centers had a 35% interest in the Új Udvar shopping center development. 
Plaza Centers had a 50% interest in Kharadi Plaza and Trivandrum Plaza.
Plaza Centers had a 43.5% interest in Dream Island.
Plaza Centers has a 75% share of Casa Radio Plaza.
Plaza Centers has a 25% share of Bangalore.
Plaza Centers has a 40% share of Chennai.
All the fi gures refl ect Plaza’s share.

42

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Management
structure

Plaza Centers’ Board

Executive Directors

Mordechay Zisser
Founder

Ran Shtarkman
President and CEO

Marco Wichers
Chairman and Independent 
Non-executive Director

Marius van Eibergen Santhagens
Independent  
Non-executive Director

Shimon Yitzchaki
Non-executive Director

Sarig Shalhav
Non-executive Director

Senior Management

Ran Shtarkman
President and CEO

Roy Linden
CFO

Uzi Eli
General Counsel

Yaron Moryosef
Chief Engineer

Therese Keys
CEE Management and Leasing 
Director

Functional Management Support

Local Country Management

Dori Keren
Country Director
Poland

Sagiv Meger
Country Director
Czech Republic, Serbia  and Balkan States

Luc Ronsmans
Country Director
The Netherlands and Romania

Oren Kolton
Country Director
India

Bulgaria and Greece are being managed
from Poland and Romania

•  Oversight of company 

strategy and all project 

development decisions

•  Wide-ranging property 

development expertise

•  Review and approval 

of business plan and 

budgets

•  Active management 

and monitoring of 

development risks

•  Experienced 

property development 

professionals with global 

property development 

expertise

•  Responsible for sourcing 

development projects

•  Development of 

business plans

•  Overseeing the 

management of 

development projects

•  Extensive local 

experience

•  Cultivating connections 

within market to source 

opportunities

•  Day-to-day management 

of local operations and 

developments

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

43

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Board of 
Directors 
and Senior 
management 

Executive directors

Mordechay Zisser, Founder and Executive Director 

(male, 58, Israeli)

Mordechay Zisser is the Founder and Executive Director of Plaza 

Centers. During more than 25 years’ of entrepreneurship and active 

involvement in some of the world’s most prestigious real estate 

developments, he has led successful projects in Israel, Western 

Europe, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), South Africa and India. 

Mr Zisser was appointed as Executive Director of the Board of 

Directors of the Company on 17 August 2006. Mr Zisser also served 

as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from 

17 August 2006 until 22 November 2011.

Ran Shtarkman, President and CEO (male, 46, Israeli)

Ran Shtarkman (CPA, MBA) joined Plaza Centers in 2002, becoming 

Chief Financial Offi cer in 2004 and CEO in September 2006. He was 

additionally appointed as Executive Director on 12 October 2006 

(and reappointed in 2008 and in 2011 for an additional three years), 

as President in 2007. Previous roles include CFO of SPL Software 

Ltd., Finance and Administration Manager for Continental Airlines’ 

Israeli  operations and Controller of Natour Ltd.

Independent Non-executive directors

Marco Wichers, Chairman (male, 54, Dutch)

Marco Wichers is the CEO and Owner of AMGEA Holding B.V. and 

the CEO of real estate consultancy AMGEA Vastgoed Adviseurs B.V. 

Previously he was the CEO of two New York-based manufacturing 

companies –  Branco International Inc. (1988-1995) and Cravat Club 

Inc. (1983-1995), which he also owned. Mr Wichers was appointed 

as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on 1 November 2006, 

reappointed in 2009 and in 2012 for an additional three years. 

Mr Wichers was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors 

of the Company on 22 November 2011.

Marius van Eibergen Santhagens, Senior Independent 

Director (male, 62, Dutch)

Marius van Eibergen Santhagens has over 20 years’ corporate 

fi nance experience. From 1985 to 1996 he held various director 

positions with Generale Bank Nederland N.V., part of the Fortis 

Group. From 1996 to 2003 Mr van Eibergen Santhagens was a 

registered interim manager consulting at various middle sized 

international operating companies. From 1999 to 2008 he was 

Managing Director of Leisure Investments & Finance B.V., a 

corporate fi nance company focused on the leisure industry, active 

in the EU and the Caribbean. Since 2005 he has been Non-executive 

Director with Engel East Europe N.V., a developer of real estate 

in Eastern Europe. Presently he is Managing Director of Stichting 

Amazon Teak Foundation, handling a €200 million investment in 

teak wood in Brazil. Mr van Eibergen Santhagens was appointed as 

Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on 1 November 2006, and 

reappointed in 2009 and in 2012 for an additional three years.

Non-executive directors

Shimon Yitzchaki (male, 58, Israeli)

Shimon Yitzchaki (CPA), Chairman of Elbit Imaging Ltd. (the 

Company’s indirect controlling shareholder) since January 2010 

(prior to that he was the President of Elbit Imaging Ltd. since 1999).*

Mr Yitzchaki has been with the Europe Israel Group since 1985 and 

has held several positions within the Group, among which, he served 

as Executive Director of Plaza Centers for the period commencing 

on 3 March 2000 and ending on 12 October 2006, thereafter he was 

appointed as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers for a period of 

three years and reappointed in 2010 for an additional three years.

Sarig Shalhav (male, 41, Dutch)

Sarig Shalhav (LLM) is a lawyer and tax counsel and has extensive 

experience on commercial real estate and real estate fi nance 

transactions and advises multinational businesses, government 

agencies, private equity houses and banks on a wide range of real 

estate and real estate fi nance related matters. In addition he acts 

as a counsel in restructuring and enforcement scenarios, buyout 

and venture capital transactions. Mr Shalhav has been working with 

leading law fi rms and major audit & tax corporations. Mr Shalhav 

was appointed as Non-executive Director of Plaza Centers on 

19 December 2013.

*  Since 14 March 2014, Mr Yitzchaki is no longer the President of Elbit Imaging Ltd.

44

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Senior management

Roy Linden (37) BBA, CPA (USA, Isr), Chief Financial Offi cer

Roy Linden joined Plaza Centers in November 2006 and acts as the 

Group’s CFO. Prior to joining the Company, he spent nearly four 

years at KPMG in Hungary, acting as manager in the real estate desk, 

specializing in auditing, business advisory, local and international 

taxation for companies operating throughout the CEE region. He also 

spent three years at Ernst and Young in Israel, as a senior member 

of an audit team specialized in high-tech companies.

Yaron Moryosef (40) BSc, Chief Engineer

Yaron Moryosef joined Plaza Centers in 2007. Prior to joining 

the Company he acted as the site engineer of the Arena Herzelia 

shopping and entertainment center, which was developed by Elbit 

Imaging Ltd. At the Company he was acting as the project manager 

of Romanian projects. In 2010, he became the Company’s Country 

Chief Engineer in Romania and on 1 August 2012 was appointed as 

the Group’s Chief Engineer and Head of Construction.

Uzi Eli (38), LLB, Attorney at Law (Israeli), MBA, General Counsel 

and Compliance Offi cer

Uzi Eli joined Plaza Centers as the Group’s General Counsel and 

Compliance Offi cer in 2007. Prior to joining the Company, he 

practiced law in two of the leading commercial legal fi rms in Israel. 

His main practice was concentrated in commercial and corporate 

law, providing ongoing legal services to corporate clients (mainly 

to hi-tech and bio-tech companies, and venture capital funds) in 

all aspects of corporate governance, and representation in various 

transactions, such as fi nancing and M&A transactions and other 

wide varieties of licensing and technology transactions.

Dori Keren (44), BA, MBA, BB in Accounting, Poland 

Country Director

Dori Keren joined Plaza Centers in 2006 as Financial Director of 

Poland and Latvia and was appointed Poland Country Director in 

2013. Prior thereto, he worked in Israel for 10 years in variety of 

fi nancial jobs in positions which accompany business activity as 

Economist, Financial Controller and CFO. 

Oren Kolton (38), Republic of India Country Director

Oren Kolton has served as the India Country Director for Elbit 

Imaging Group ventures in India since January 2010. From mid 

2007 to December 2009 Mr Kolton has served as Elbit’s Vice 

President of Business Development Asia. Prior to joining the 

Elbit Imaging Group in April 2005, Mr Kolton served as a faculty 

member at the Civil Engineering faculty, in the Technion – the Israel 

Institute of Technology, where he was involved in research and 

taught Undergraduate Management Courses. Mr Kolton holds a BSc 

(magna cum laude) in Civil Engineering and MSc in Construction 

Management from the Technion, and an MBA in Financing and 

Marketing from the Tel Aviv University.

Sagiv Meger (36), Czech Republic, Serbia and Balkan States 

Country Director

Sagiv Meger joined the Company in late 2007 as the Country 

Director of Plaza Centers Serbia and was appointed as Country 

Director of the Czech Republic in 2009. Prior to joining Plaza 

Centers he was the COO of a company based in Angola, Africa 

for four years, supporting over 50 various projects, ranging from 

telecommunications, real estate, agriculture to military intelligence. 

He gained an extensive range of fi rst-hand experience in previous 

management positions.

Luc Ronsmans (63), MBA, The Netherlands and Romania 

Therese Keys (43), BBus (Marketing), CEE Management and 

Country Director

Luc Ronsmans joined the Europe Israel Group in 1999. Located 

in Amsterdam and Bucharest, he acts as manager for European 

operations for both the Company and its Group affi liates. Prior to 

joining the Europe Israel Group, he was active in the banking sector, 

holding managerial positions with Manufacturers Hanover Bank, 

Continental Bank (Chicago), AnHyp Bank and Bank Naggelmachers 

in Belgium.

Leasing Director

Therese Keys has joined the Plaza team in January 2013, as CEE 

Management and Leasing Director. Prior to joining Plaza Centers, Ms 

Keys was involved for nine years in land acquisition and commercial, 

and residential development in the Balkans. Before moving to 

Eastern Europe Ms Keys worked for 10 years in the shopping center 

industry in Australia, initially with the Stockland Trust Group, and 

then The Westfi eld Group. Roles in these companies included 

development, management, marketing and leasing of shopping 

centers.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

45

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Directors’
report*

Principal activities and review of business

Going concern

Plaza Centers N.V. is a leading developer of shopping and 

On 14 November 2013 the Company announced that it will be 

entertainment centers with a focus on the emerging markets of 

freezing payments to all its lenders and will be entering into 

Central and Eastern Europe (“CEE”), where it has operated since 

negotiations with these creditors to arrive at an agreed debt 

1996 when it became the fi rst company to develop western-style 

arrangement (restructuring plan). The Company’s proposed debt 

shopping and entertainment centers in Hungary. This followed 

arrangement includes a potential of equity injection from the 

its early recognition of the growing middle class and increasingly 

owners in the amount of circa 20 million EUR via a right issuance, 

affl uent consumer base in such markets.

a delay of all the bond series’ principal payment by three years, 

a realization plan under which 19 of the 30 assets are estimated 

Since then, it has expanded its CEE operations into Poland, the 

to be realized by 2018 for circa 383 million EUR (net proceeds), 

Czech Republic, Latvia, Romania and Serbia. In addition, the Group 

a transfer of 75% of the net proceeds of realizations to the 

has extended its area of operations beyond the CEE into India and 

bondholders as early repayment, compensate the bondholders with 

the US. The Group has been present in real estate development 

an additional 1.5% annual interest, and additional compensation to 

in emerging markets for over 18 years. To date, the Group has 

the bondholders with equity instruments (share issuance without 

developed, let and opened 33 shopping and entertainment centers 

additional proceeds), being shares issued representing 13.5% of the 

and one offi ce building. 21 of these centers were acquired by 

Company’s outstanding shares.

Klépierre, one of the largest shopping center owners/operators in 

Europe. Four additional shopping and entertainment centers were 

Management believes that the implementation of the restructuring 

sold to the Dawnay Day Group, one of the leading UK institutional 

plan will provide the Company with the ability to resolve its 

property investors at that time and one shopping center (Arena 

immediate liquidity situation in order to continue operating as going 

Plaza in Budapest, Hungary) was sold to Active Asset Investment 

concern and preserve value for its shareholders and creditors.

Management (“aAIM”), a UK commercial property investment group. 

The remaining seven centers which were completed during 2009, 

Management acknowledges that signifi cant uncertainty remains over 

2010, 2011 and 2012 are being held and managed by the Company, 

the Group’s ability to meet its funding requirements and to refi nance 

while utilizing the Company’s extensive experience in managing retail 

or repay its debts as they fall due. If for any reason the Group is 

assets. 

unable to reach an approved restructuring plan, then this would have 

an impact on the Group’s ability to realise assets at their recognised 

For a more detailed status of current activities and projects, the 

values, and to extinguish liabilities in the normal course of business 

directors refer to the President and Chief Executive Offi cer’s 

at the amounts stated in the consolidated fi nancial statements and 

statement on pages 30 to 32 as well as to the following chapters: 

ultimately result in the Group being unable to continue as a going 

Overview, Business Review and Management and Governance.

concern. The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared 

For an overview of subsequent events refer to note 38 to the 
consolidated fi nancial statements.

Pipeline projects

on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Group will be able 

to successfully complete its proposed debt arrangement.

Restructuring

On 18 November 2013, the Company applied for suspension of 

The Company is active in seeking new sites and development 

payments proceedings (surseance van betaling) under Dutch law 

opportunities in countries in which the Company is currently 

and simultaneously fi led a draft restructuring plan (ontwerpakkoord) 

operating. The Company is also analyzing and contemplating to 

(the “restructuring plan”) with the district court of Amsterdam, the 

invest in further countries that meet its development parameters and 

Netherlands (Rechtbank Amsterdam) (the “Court”). 

investment criteria.

*   Chapters 1 (Overview), 2 (Business review) and 3 (Management and governance) are part 

of the Directors’ report.

On 18 November 2013, the Court granted the Company a provisional 

suspension of payments, appointing Mr J.L.M. Groenewegen 

as administrator (bewindvoerder) and Mrs L. van Berkum as 

46

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

supervisory judge (rechter-commissaris). The court determined 

during November and December 2013 decreased its holdings to 

that no hearing should take place for deciding on the granting of 

less than 10%. In addition, BZ WBK AIB Asset Management S.A. 

defi nitive suspension of payments, order that, instead, a creditors 

of Poland has disposed of its entire stake in Plaza and is no longer 

meeting will take place to vote on the restructuring plan on 

a shareholder. Other than that and except as disclosed under 

26 June 2014 and determined that the Company’s creditors can fi le 

“directors’ interests” above, the Company is not aware of any 

their claims for voting purposes before 12 June 2014.

additional interests amounting to 5% or more in the Company’s 

shares besides that of its parent company, Elbit Imaging Ltd.

Dividends

Following the withholding of payments of all corporate level debt 

Issue of shares

and in line with the restructuring plan (refer to note 34(A)), the 

Pursuant to the Articles of Association, the General Meeting of 

Company’s management will commit to certain restrictions on 

Shareholders is the corporate body authorized to issue shares and 

dividends.

Directors’ interests

The directors have no interests in the shares of the Company, other 

than the directors’ share options as given on pages 66 and 67 of this 

report.

Directors and appointments

The following served as directors of the Company at 

31 December 2013:

Mordechay Zisser, Executive Director

Ran Shtarkman, Executive Director, President and CEO

Shimon Yitzchaki, Non-executive Director

Sarig Shalhav, Non-executive Director

Marius van Eibergen Santhagens, Independent 

Non-executive Director

Marco Wichers, Independent Non-executive Director, Chairman

The General Meeting of Shareholders is the corporate body 

authorized to appoint and dismiss the directors. All directors in 

function, unless they are retiring, submit themselves for re-election 

every three years, pursuant to the rotation scheme for directors as 

laid down in article 15.3 of the Articles of Association. The General 

Meeting of Shareholders is entitled to suspend and dismiss directors 

by a simple majority vote.

Substantial shareholdings

to disapply pre-emption rights. In each Annual General Meeting, 

the General Meeting of Shareholders is requested to delegate these 

powers to the Board. The scope of this power of the Board shall be 

determined by the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders 

to give the authorization. Typically, the Company requests in each 

Annual General Meeting of Shareholders the authorization for the 

Board to issue shares up to an aggregate nominal value of 33% 

of the then issued share capital and an authorization for the Board 

to disapply pre-emption rights which is limited to the allotment of 

shares up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of 10% of the 

then issued share capital. The authorization is valid for a period 

ending on the date of the next Annual General Meeting.

Employee involvement

The Group has 136 employees and other persons providing similar 

services. In 2012 the Group had 166 employees and other persons 

providing similar services. The management does not expect 

signifi cant changes in the development of the number of employees, 

following reorganization process in recent years. The Company’s 

employees are vital to its ongoing success. It is therefore important 

that all levels of staff are involved in its decision-making processes. 

To this end, the Company has an open culture and fl exible structure, 

and staff are encouraged formally and informally to become involved 

in discussions on the Company’s future strategy and developments. 

Employee share option schemes were adopted on 26 October 2006 

(as amended in October 2008, November 2011 and November 

2012) and on 22 November 2011 which enables employees to share 

directly in the success of the Company.

Currently ING Open Pension Fund (“ING”), Poland held 

approximately 4.55% of the entire issued share capital of the 

Company, Davidson Kempner Capital Management LLC held 

approximately 5.54% of the entire issued share capital of the 

Company. In March 2013, ING increased its stake to 11.8% and 

Annual General Meeting (AGM)

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is held every year 

within six months from the end of the fi nancial year in order to 

discuss and approve the Annual Report and adopt (vaststellen) the 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

47

 
 
plaza centers/management 

E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Dutch statutory annual accounts, discharge the directors from their 

Company on such terms and in such manner as the directors may 

liability for the conduct of business in the preceding year and any 

from time to time determine, subject to certain conditions; (ix) to 

other issues mentioned below.

re-elect as a director, Mr Mordechay Zisser; and (x) to re-elect as a 

The main powers of the General Meeting of Shareholders relate 

to the appointment of members of the Board, the adoption of the 

All proposed resolutions were passed, except from the proposed 

annual fi nancial statements, declaration of dividend, release the 

resolution to authorize the Company to purchase its own shares 

Board’s members from liability and amendments to the Articles of 

under item (viii) herein above which was denied.

director, Mr Ran Shtarkman.

Association. 

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders was held at Park Plaza 

Victoria Hotel Amsterdam, Damrak 1-5, 1012 LG Amsterdam, The 

Netherlands on 20 June 2013 at 10:30 am (CET).

In this AGM, inter alia, the following resolutions were proposed 

to the shareholders: (i) to approve the Company’s Dutch statutory 

annual accounts and annual report being drawn up in the English 

language; (ii) to consider the Company’s Dutch statutory annual 

accounts and the annual report for the year ended 31 December 

2012; (iii) to adopt the Company’s Dutch statutory annual accounts 

for the year ended 31 December 2012; (iv) to discharge the directors 

of the Company from their liability for the conduct of business 

for the year ended 31 December 2012; (v) to resolve to pay no 

dividend to the holders of ordinary shares in respect of the year 

ended 31 December 2012; (vi) to authorize the Board generally 

and unconditionally to exercise all powers of the Company to allot 

equity securities in the Company up to an aggregate nominal value 

of €980,714, being 33% (thirty-three percent) of the Company’s 

issued ordinary share capital as at the date of this notice, provided 

that such authority shall expire on the conclusion of the Annual 

General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless previously renewed, 

varied or revoked by the Company in a general meeting, save that 

the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement 

which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after 

such expiry and the Board may allot equity securities in pursuance 

of such an offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby 

had not expired; (vii) to give a special instruction to the Board 

authorizing it to disapply the pre-emption rights set out in article 

6 of the Company’s Articles of Association, such power to expire 

at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting to be held in 

2014, and the Board may allot equity securities following an offer 

or agreement made before the expiry of the authority and provided 

that the authority is limited to the allotment of the equity securities 

up to a maximum aggregate nominal amount of €297,186; (viii) 

to authorize the Company, generally and unconditionally, for the 

purpose of article 8 of the Articles of Association of the Company, 

to make market purchases of ordinary shares in the capital of the 

Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM)

An Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders was held at Park 

Plaza Victoria Hotel Amsterdam, Damrak 1-5, 1012 LG Amster-

dam, The Netherlands on 19 December 2013 at 10am (CET). In 

this EGM, inter alia, the following resolutions were proposed to 

the shareholders: (i) to honourably dismiss Mr Edward Paap from 

his position as Non-executive Director; (ii) to appoint Mr Sarig C. 

Shalhav as Non-executive Director; (iii) to authorize the Board to 

generally and unconditionally exercise all powers of the Company to 

allot equity securities (including rights to acquire equity securities) 

in the Company up to an aggregate nominal value of €1,485,931, 

being equal to 50% (fi fty percent) of the Company’s issued ordinary 

share capital, provided that such authority shall expire on the 

conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless 

previously renewed, varied or revoked by the general meeting, 

save that the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or 

agreement which would or might require equity securities to be 

allotted after such expiry and the Board may allot equity securities 

in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if the authority 

conferred hereby had not expired. If granted, this authorization shall 

replace the authorization granted at the Annual General Meeting of 

the Company on 20 June 2013 (AGM 2013); (iv) subject to passing 

the proposed resolution under item (iii) above, to authorize the 

Board to disapply pre-emption rights, limited to the allotment of 

equity securities (including rights to acquire equity securities) up to 

a maximum aggregate nominal amount of € 1,485,931, being equal 

to 50% (fi fty percent) of the issued ordinary share capital of the 

Company), such power to expire on the conclusion of the Annual 

General Meeting to be held in 2014 unless previously renewed, 

varied or revoked by the general meeting. 

If granted, this authorization shall replace the authorization granted 

at the AGM 2013.

The proposed resolutions on items (i) & (ii) above were passed and 

the proposed resolutions on items (iii) & (iv) of the agenda were 

denied.

48

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
and governance

directors’ report

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Article 10 of Directive 2004/25

With regard to the information referred to in the resolution of article 10 

of the EC Directive pertaining to a takeover bid which is required to 

be provided according to Dutch law, the following can be reported:

•  There are no special restrictions on the transfer of the shares of 

the Company.

•  There are no special statutory rights related to the shares of the 

Company.

•  There are no restrictions on the voting rights on the Company’s 

shares. 

•  Information on signifi cant shareholding can be found above.

•  There are no agreements between the shareholders which are 

known to the Company and may result in restrictions on the 

transfer of securities and/or voting rights.

•  The applicable provisions regarding the appointment and 

dismissal of members of the Board and amendments to the 

Articles of Association are set forth above.

•  The power of the Board regarding the issue of shares and the 

exclusion of pre-emption rights and the repurchase of shares in 

the Company can be found above.

Poland, as well as Timis¸oara Plaza in Romania will be the next 

centers to commence construction.

In light of market conditions at the time, in the second half of 2008 

the Group took the strategic decision to scale back on starting 

new projects and to focus on projects with availability of external 

fi nancing and strong tenants demand. The Group currently plans to 

progress in a selected number of projects which are: (i) Casa Radio 

(Phase I) in Romania; (ii) Timisoara in Romania; (iii) Lodz Mall in 

Poland; (iv) Belgrade Plaza (MUP) in Serbia; (v) Belgrade Plaza 

(Visnjicka) in Serbia; (vi) Cina in Romania; and (vii) Chennai in India.

Plaza’s clear priority is to reach a successful conclusion with its 

restructuring process whilst the Company continues to leverage 

the ability and expertise of its management team, the quality of its 

income generating assets, and its ongoing focus on deleveraging 

its balance sheet to achieve success in its day-to-day operations. It 

is this combination of factors that underpins the Board’s continued 

confi dence that the Company retains signifi cant value for its 

stakeholders and will be able to repay its creditors in full.

Plaza is on various stages of negotiation for selling part of its assets, 

but currently there are no signed agreements or head of terms in 

place except the agreement to sell Koregaon Park.

•  There are no signifi cant agreements to which the Company is a 

party and which take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of 

control of the Company following a takeover bid.

The number of the Group’s employees changed signifi cantly in 

the course of the past years, however following the restructuring 

process (refer to page 8) no material change is expected for 2014.

•  There are no agreements between the Company and its Board 

members or employees providing for compensation if they 

resign or are made redundant without valid reason or if their 

employment ceases because of a takeover bid. 

•  Other information can be found in the notes to the fi nancial 

statements (please see note 23 Equity). 

Forecast

Plaza continues to evaluate its extensive development pipeline, 

which it believes offers signifi cant opportunities. Plaza remain 

prudent and pragmatic in its approach to deploying signifi cant 

levels of equity to commence new projects. This being said, Plaza 

continues to progress a limited number of projects in the most 

resilient countries of CEE, such as Poland and Serbia, where GDP 

growth and forecasts remain above the averages for Europe and, 

as such, Visnjicka Plaza in Belgrade, Serbia, and Łódz´  Plaza in 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

49

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Corporate 
governance

The Company was incorporated in The Netherlands on 17 May 

•   Best Practice Provision II.1.6 stipulates that the management 

1993 as a private limited liability company (besloten vennootschap 

board shall describe the sensitivity of the results of the Company 

met beperkte aansprakelijkheid). The Company was converted into 

to external factors and variables. Since the Company has no 

a public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap) on 12 

streaming/fi x annual revenue from operation of properties, it does 

October 2006, with the name “Plaza Centers N.V.”. The principal 

not perform such analysis. 

applicable legislation and the legislation under which the Company 

and the Ordinary Shares in the Company have been created is book 

•   Best Practice Provision II.2.4 stipulates that granted options 

2 of the Dutch Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek).

shall not be exercised in the fi rst three years after the date of 

The Company has the Ordinary Shares listed on the main market of 

of options to a lockup period of three years. The reason therefore 

granting. The Share Option Schemes do not restrict the exercise 

the LSE and on the main market of the WSE. 

Except as set out below, the Company complies with the Dutch 

Code and the UK Code on Corporate Governance. The Company 

acknowledges the importance of good corporate governance. The 

Company has made an effort in drawing up internal corporate 

governance regulations that comply, to the highest extent possible, 

with the Dutch Code and the UK Code on Corporate Governance. 

Where deviations from the Dutch Code or the UK Code on Corporate 

Governance have been necessary, such has been indicated below.

The Company currently has six directors, two of whom are executive 

directors and four of whom are non-executive directors, of whom 

two are considered by the Board to be independent. The Board 

believes that there is a satisfactory balance for the purposes of decision-

making at Board level in line with the provisions of the UK Code 

on Corporate Governance, the Dutch Code and the WSE Corporate 

Governance Rules.

Deviations from the Dutch Code in 2013

The Company has not applied a limited number of provisions from 

the Dutch Code, as it has not considered them to be in the interests 

of the Company and its stakeholders. 

•   Best Practice Provision II.1.3 stipulates, inter alia, that the 

Company should have an internal risk management and control 

system and that in that respect, it should have, inter alia, employ 

as instruments of such internal risk management and control 

system, a code of conduct which should be published on the 

Company’s website. Such code of conduct is not available at the 

date of publication of this document.

is that the Company and the Elbit Imaging Group share the same 

remuneration policy and Share Option Schemes were drafted in 

accordance with Elbit Imaging’s share option scheme, in order 

to maintain the incentive for all employees of the Elbit Imaging 

Group based upon the same principles.

•   Best Practice Provision II.2.7 stipulates that neither the exercise 

price nor the other conditions regarding the granted options 

shall be modifi ed during the term of the options, except insofar 

as prompted by structural changes relating to the shares of the 

Company in accordance with established market practice. The 

Company has on 25 November 2008 adjusted the exercise price 

of the granted options and in November 2012 the Company 

extended the option term from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from 

the date of grant of the 2006 Share Option Scheme. This has been 

done since the Board was of the view that the each Share Option 

Scheme should serve as an effective incentive for the employees 

of the Group, to encourage them to remain in employment and 

work to achieve the best possible results for the Company and 

the shareholders. Market conditions and the global economic 

crisis that is still impacting the geographic regions and real 

estate sectors in which the Company operates, however, led to a 

strong decline in the Company’s share price at both the London 

Stock Exchange and the Warsaw Stock Exchange, resulting in 

practically all options being out of the money without a favorable 

outlook for a quick recovery. In order to maintain the incentive 

for all employees, the Board has submitted to the extraordinary 

meeting of shareholders that was held on 25 November 2008, 

a proposal to amend the 2006 Share Option Scheme and to 

determine the exercise price of all options granted on or prior to 

25 October 2008, to GBP 0.52 and to the extraordinary meeting 

of shareholders that was held on 20 November 2012, a proposal 

•   Best Practice Provision II.1.4 (b) stipulates that the management 

to amend the 2006 Share Option Scheme and to extend the 

board shall provide a description of the design and effectiveness 

option term from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from the date of 

of the internal risk management and control system for the main 

grant to be in line with the end date of the option term under the 

risks. Such description is not available.

2011 Share Option Scheme, adopted by the extraordinary general 

50

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

meeting of shareholders on 22 November 2011. In an attempt 

as each Board member is obliged to notify all direct and indirect 

to insure that the options are and remain an effective incentive 

confl icts of interest, the Articles contain no specifi c approval clause.

and to assist in the retention of employees, and that the option 

holders should have the opportunity to exercise their options until 

•   Best Practice Provision III.1.7 stipulates that the supervisory 

the same end date as the holders of options under the 2011 Share 

board shall discuss at least once a year on its own, both its 

Option Scheme, the revised 2006 Share Option Scheme includes 

own functioning and that of its individual members, and the 

an extension of the vesting term for options granted less than one 

conclusions that must be drawn on the basis thereof. The desired 

year prior to 25 October 2008. The shareholders approved the 

profi le, composition and competence of the supervisory board 

amendments of the 2006 Share Option Scheme, the adjustment of 

shall also be discussed. Moreover, the supervisory board shall 

the exercise price and the extension of the option term. 

discuss at least once a year without the management board being 

present, the functioning of the management board as an organ 

•   Best Practice Provision II.2.12 and Best Practice Provision 

of the company and the performance of its individual members, 

II.2.13 stipulate, inter alia, that the remuneration report of 

and the conclusions that must be drawn on the basis thereof. In 

the supervisory board shall include account of the manner in 

2013 the non-executive directors have not specifi cally discussed 

which the remuneration policy has been implemented in the 

the items that appear in this Best Practice Provision on separate 

past fi nancial year as well as an overview of the remuneration 

occasions. The Board, however, feels it important to notify the 

policy planned by the supervisory board for the next fi nancial 

shareholders that as a rule, every Board meeting includes an 

year and subsequent years and should contain the information 

assessment by all Board members of their own functioning and 

specifi ed in these provisions. The current remuneration policy 

that of their fellow Board members. The Board is of the view that, 

of the Company has remained unchanged from 2006 at the 

given the fact that the Company has a one-tier board rather than 

moment the Company’s shares were admitted to listing and is 

a separate management board and supervisory board, this course 

fairly straight-forward, as such that “implementation” is not an 

of action appropriately meets actual purpose of this Best Practice 

issue. Furthermore, pursuant to the Articles, the General Meeting 

Provision.

determines the remuneration policy, and not the non-executive 

directors. When the remuneration policy needs amendment, this 

•   Best Practice Provision III.1.8 stipulates that the supervisory 

will be addressed in a General Meeting.

board shall discuss at least once a year the corporate strategy 

and the risks of business and the results of assessment by the 

•   Best Practice Provision II.3.3 and Best Practice Provision III.6.2 

management board of the structure and operation of the internal 

stipulate that both executive directors and non-executive directors 

risks management and control systems, as well as any signifi cant 

shall not take part in any discussion or decision-making that 

changes thereto. In 2013, there have not been separate meetings 

involves a subject or transaction in relation to which they have a 

of the non-executive directors to discuss the items mentioned 

confl ict of interest with the Company. Since 4 July 2013, Section 

in this Best Practice Provision. The reason therefore is that 

17.1 of the Articles of Association provide for this. Section 17.2 

risk management at the Company is, pursuant to the internally 

of the Articles of Association further stipulates that when as a 

applicable corporate governance regulations, a matter specifi cally 

consequence of the provision of Section 17.1. of the Articles of 

reserved for decision by the full Board. Board meetings in 2013 

Association, no board resolution can be passed, then despite the 

have included discussions in respect of corporate strategy and 

confl ict of interest, such resolution can be resolved by the Board 

risk management and periodically throughout the year, the internal

provided that the resolution is adopted unanimously and in a 

  system of risk management has been assessed by the full Board.

meeting where all Board members are present or represented.

  Best Practice Provisions III.2.1 and III.8.4 stipulate that the 

•   Best Practice Provision II.3.4 and Best Practice Provision III.6.3 

majority of the members of the Board shall be independent 

stipulate, inter alia, that decisions to enter into transactions in 

non-executives within the meaning of Best Practice Provision 

which there are confl icts of interest with management board 

III.2.2. The Company currently has two executive directors (who 

members that are of material signifi cance to the Company and/

are considered to be non-independent) and four non-executive 

or to the relevant board members require the approval of the 

directors out of whom two non-executive directors are considered 

non-executive directors. As the Company has a one-tier board and 

to be independent, applying the criteria of Best Practice Provision 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

51

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

corpo

III.2.2. The non-executive directors who are considered to be 

•   Best Practice Provision III.5.11, inter alia, provides that the 

non-independent are Messrs Shimon Yitzchaki and Sarig Shalhav. 

Remuneration Committee shall not be chaired by a non-executive 

The independent non-executive directors are: Messrs Marco 

director who is either a former executive director or a member 

Habib Wichers and Marius van Eibergen Santhagens. See also 

of the management board of another listed company. Since the 

page 44 – Additional information for an overview of the directors’ 

Company’s Remuneration Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon 

former and current functions. Consequently, two out of the six 

Yitzchaki, who is a former Executive Director and serves as 

directors are considered to be independent. The Board believes 

President of EI, the Company deviates from this requirement. 

that the experience of the non-independent directors is of great 

The Board is convinced that the experience of Mr Yitzchaki in this 

importance to the Company.

respect should be considered more important than the fact that 

Mr Yitzchaki is a Board member of another listed company. 

•   Best Practice Provision III.3.3 and Best Practice Provision III.4.1 

(a) stipulate that all supervisory board members shall follow an 

•   Best Practice Provision III.7.1 stipulates that non-executive 

induction program. The composition of the Board has remained 

directors should not be granted any shares and/or rights to 

unchanged from 2006 until 19 December 2013, on which date Mr 

shares by way of remuneration. Under the 2006 Share Option 

Sarig Shalhav was appointed as Non-executive Director. Given the 

Scheme, prior to the admission of the Ordinary Shares to 

fact that the Board does not undergo frequent changes as to its 

trading on the London Stock Exchange and thereafter, options 

composition, there is currently no induction program in place.

were granted to Mr Yitzchaki. Furthermore, the Share Option 

Schemes do not exclude the possibility of making further grants 

•   Best Practice Provision III.3.5 stipulates that a non-executive 

of options to non-executive directors. In particular, the Board 

director (in terms of the Dutch Code a supervisory director 

believes that the granting of options to Mr Yitzchaki has been 

(commissaris)) may be appointed to the board for a maximum 

appropriate, given his extensive involvement in the Company to 

of three four-year terms. Section 15 of the Articles provides for 

date. Furthermore, the Company has retained the right to grant 

a retirement schedule whereby directors who have been in offi ce 

options to non-executive directors as it believes that granting 

for not less than three consecutive annual general meetings shall 

such options is appropriate in order to offer present and future 

retire from offi ce. Pursuant to section 15.6 of the Articles, such a 

non-executive directors a competitive remuneration package. 

director may be reappointed, which could result in a term of offi ce 

All proposals for remuneration in the form of shares or rights to 

which is longer than three four-year terms.

acquire shares (options) will be submitted to the General Meeting 

of Shareholders, pursuant to Section 15.7 of the Articles and book 

•   Best Practice Provision III.5.1 provides that the committee rules 

2 of the DCC. 

stipulate that a maximum of one member of each committee need 

not be independent within the meaning of Best Practice Provision 

•   Best Practice Provision IV.3.13 stipulates that the Company 

III.2.2 The Company’s nomination committee is comprised of 

shall formulate an outline policy on bilateral contacts with the 

three members, two of whom, Messrs Yitzchaki and Shalhav, are 

shareholders and publish this policy on its website. All contacts 

considered to be non-independent. The Board believes that the 

between the Company and its shareholders are carried out in full 

composition of the nomination committee as currently envisaged 

transparency and therefore the Board considers such policy as 

is in the best interests of the Company, given the skills and 

not necessary. 

experience of the committee members.

•   Best Practice Provision V.2.1. stipulates that the external auditor 

•   Best Practice provision III.5.6 stipulates that the Audit Committee 

may be questioned by the general meeting in relation to his report 

must not be chaired by the chairman of the board or by a 

on the fairness of the fi nancial statements and that the external 

former executive director of the company. The Company’s Audit 

auditor shall for this purpose attend and be entitled to address 

Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, who has been 

this meeting. As the experience is that the shareholders vote by 

an Executive Director of the Company and thus the Company 

proxy in a General Meeting of Shareholders, in the view of the 

deviates from this Best Practice Provision. The Board, however, 

Board, the presence of the external auditor is not required.

believes that given Mr Yitzchaki’s extensive fi nancial experience, 

chairmanship of the Audit Committee is appropriate.

52

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
and governance

rate governance

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

•   Best Practice Provision V.3 stipulates, inter alia, that the Company 

the Company does not comply with this provision. However, the 

should have an internal auditor. Though in fact the Company does 

Board is satisfi ed that Mr Yitzchaki’s experience outweighs the 

not have an internal auditor itself, the Company has a Quality 

fact that he is not regarded as being independent.

Control Regulator, who practically functions as an internal auditor. 

Deviations from the UK Code on 
Corporate Governance

The Company did not comply with the following provisions of the UK 

Code on Corporate Governance in the year ended 31 December 2013:

•   Code Provision A.2.1 states that the division of responsibilities 

between the Chairman and Chief Executive should be clearly 

established, set out in writing and agreed by the Board. Whilst 

the Company does not possess such a document, it believes that 

the division of responsibilities between the Chairman and Chief 

Executive is suffi ciently clear.

•   Code Provision A.4.2 states that the Chairman should hold 

meetings with the non-executive directors without the executive 

directors present and, led by the Senior Independent Director, 

the non-executive directors should meet without the Chairman 

present at least annually to appraise the Chairman’s performance 

and on such other occasions as are deemed appropriate. 

•   Code Provision B.6.1 states that the Board should refer in the 

annual report as to how performance evaluation of the Board, its 

committees and its individual directors has been conducted.

•   Code Provision B.6.3 states that the non-executive directors, led 

by the Senior Independent Director, should be responsible for 

performance evaluation of the Chairman, taking into account the 

views of executive directors. In 2013, the Chairman and the non-

executive directors did not meet separately. However, at every 

Board meeting, an assessment is made by each Board member of 

his/her own performance and that of other members. The Board 

is of the view that this course of action provides an appropriate 

mechanism for the evaluation of the performance of Board 

members.

•   Code Provision C.2.1 states that the Board should, at least 

annually, conduct a review of the effectiveness of the Company’s 

risk management and internal control systems and should 

report to shareholders that they have done so. The Board did 

not conduct a review of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk 

management and internal control systems in the year under 

review. However, the Board has established a process for 

identifying and managing the risks faced by the Company and 

both the Audit Committee and the executive directors regularly 

consider the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and 

risk management procedures as part of the on-going management 

of the Company. The Board confi rms that any appropriate actions 

either have been or are being taken to address any weaknesses in 

these areas.

•   Code Provision C.3.6 states (amongst other things) that, where 

there is no internal audit function, the Audit Committee should 

consider annually whether there is a need for an internal audit 

function and make a recommendation to the Board, and the 

reasons for the absence of such a function should be explained in 

the relevant section of the annual report. Although the Company 

does not have an internal auditor, the Company has access to a 

quality control regulator who, in practice, functions as an internal 

auditor.

•   Code Provision E.2.3 states that the Chairman should arrange 

for the Chairmen of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination 

Committees to be available to answer questions at the Annual 

General Meeting of Shareholders and for all directors to attend. In 

the year under review, the Chairman of the Nomination Committee 

and Audit Committee, Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, was unable to attend 

the Annual General Meeting.

Compliance with WSE Corporate 
Governance Rules

•   Code Provision B.2.1 states, amongst other things, that a majority 

The WSE Corporate Governance Rules (the Code of Best Practice for 

of members of the Nomination Committee should be independent 

WSE-Listed Companies) applies to companies listed on the WSE, 

non-executive directors and that the Chairman or an independent 

irrespective of whether such companies are incorporated outside of 

non-executive director should chair the committee. Since the 

Poland. The WSE Corporate Governance Rules consist of general 

Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr Shimon Yitzchaki, who 

recommendations related to best practice for listed companies 

is a not regarded as being an independent non-executive director, 

(Part I) and best practice provisions relating to management 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

53

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

corpo

boards, supervisory board members and shareholders (Parts II 

to perform its duties, each Director has full access to all relevant 

to IV). The WSE Corporate Governance Rules impose upon the 

information. If necessary, the non-executive directors may take 

companies listed on the WSE an obligation to disclose in their 

independent professional advice at the Company’s expense.

current reports continuous or incidental noncompliance with best 

practice provisions (with the exception of the rules set forth in Part 

In line with the Dutch Code and the UK Combined Code, the 

I). Moreover, every year each WSE-listed company is required to 

Company has established three committees: an Audit Committee, 

publish a detailed statement on any noncompliance with the WSE 

a Remuneration Committee and a Nomination Committee. The 

Corporate Governance Rules (including the rules set forth in Part I) 

members of these committees are appointed from among the non-

by way of a statement submitted with the Company’s annual report. 

executive directors. The terms of reference of the committees have 

Companies listed on the WSE are required to justify non-compliance 

been supplemented with additional provisions from the Combined 

or partial compliance with any WSE Corporate Governance Rule and 

Code. A brief description of the terms of reference of the committees 

to present possible ways of eliminating the potential consequences 

is set out below. The Board has also established an executive 

of such non-compliance or the steps such company intends to 

committee comprising the two executive directors and any relevant 

take to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with such rule in the 

senior managers or other personnel who may be invited. The 

future. The Company intends, to the extent practicable, to comply 

executive committee meets on a monthly basis to discuss, amongst 

with all the principles of the WSE Corporate Governance Rules. 

others, the status of contracts, including budgets, contingencies and 

However, certain principles will apply to the Company only to the 

risk management issues.

extent permitted by Dutch law. Detailed information regarding 

non-compliance, as well as additional explanations regarding partial 

compliance with certain Corporate Governance Rules of the WSE 

due to incompatibilities with Dutch law, will be included in the 

aforementioned reports, which will be available on the Company’s 

website and published by way of a current report.

Board practices

Audit Committee 

The Audit Committee comprises three non-executive directors 

and meets at least three times each fi nancial year. Currently, the 

Audit Committee is chaired by Mr Yitzchaki and the other members 

are Messrs Wichers and van Eibergen Santhagens. The Audit 

Committee must consider, amongst other matters: (i) the integrity 

of the fi nancial statements of the Company, including its annual 

In The Netherlands, statutory law provides for both a one-tier 

and interim accounts, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal 

governance and a two-tier governance (the latter having a separate 

controls and risk management systems; (ii) auditors’ reports; and 

management board and a separate supervisory board).

(iii) the terms of appointment and remuneration of the auditor. The 

committee supervises and monitors, and advises the Board on, 

It is well established practice for international active companies in 

risk management and control systems and the implementation of 

the Netherlands to have a one-tier structure in the management 

codes of conduct. In addition, the Audit Committee supervises the 

board (raad van bestuur). Although all members of the management 

submission by the Company of fi nancial information and a number 

board are formally managing directors (bestuurders), the Articles 

of other audit-related issues.

provide that certain directors have tasks and obligations which are 

similar to tasks and obligations of executive directors and certain 

directors which have tasks and obligations which are similar to tasks 

of non-executive directors. The Articles provide that some directors 

are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Company 

and other directors are responsible for supervising the day-to-day 

management of the Company. All responsibilities are subject to the 

overall responsibility of the Board.

All statutory provisions relating to the members of the management 

board apply in principle to all members of a one-tier board.

The Board meets regularly throughout the year. To enable the Board 

Remuneration Committee

The Remuneration Committee, comprising three non-executive 

directors, meets at least twice each fi nancial year to prepare 

the Board’s decisions on the remuneration of directors and the 

Company’s Share Option Scheme (Under Dutch law and the Articles, 

the principal guidelines for directors’ remuneration and approval for 

directors’ options and share incentive schemes must be determined 

by a general meeting). The Remuneration Committee also prepares 

a remuneration report which is included into the Company’s The 

remuneration report may be found on pages 66 and 67. 

54

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
and governance

rate governance

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Currently, the Remuneration Committee is chaired by Mr Yitzchaki 

Shareholder. If a confl ict of interest arises between the Controlling 

and the other members are Messrs Wichers and van Eibergen 

Shareholder and the Company, the non-independent directors will 

Santhagens.

take no part in the Board’s decisions on the matter.

Nomination Committee

Meeting at least twice a year, the Nomination Committee comprises 

three non-executive directors. Its main roles are to prepare selection 

criteria and appointment procedures for Board members and to 

review the Board’s structure, size and composition. Currently, the 

Nomination Committee is chaired by Mr Shalhav and the other 

members are Messrs Yitzchaki and van Eibergen Santhagens.

Internal control - Risk management

The Board has established a continuous process for identifying and 

managing the risks faced by the Company, and confi rms that any 

appropriate actions have been or are being taken to address any 

weaknesses.

It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to consider the 

effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls, risk management 

procedures, and risks associated with individual development 

projects. 

Share dealing code

Furthermore, the Articles stipulate that a member of the Board must 

abstain from participating in the decision-making process with 

respect to matters by which he has a direct or indirect confl ict of in-

terest with the Company. When as a consequence thereof, no board 

resolution can be passed, then despite the confl ict of interest such 

resolution can be resolved by the Board provided that the resolution 

is adopted unanimously in a meeting in which all members of the 

Board are present or represented.

Shareholder communication

The Company’s management meets with shareholders each year at 

the Annual General Meeting (AGM) to discuss matters relating to 

the business. If necessary, the Board may convene Extraordinary 

General Meeting (EGM). 

Details of this year’s AGM and EGM can be found on pages 47 and 48.

The Board is committed to maintaining an open, honest and positive 

dialogue with shareholders.

To ensure that all its communications are factually correct, it is 

The Company operates a share dealing code, which limits the 

furnished with full information before every meeting on the state 

freedom of directors and certain employees of the Company to 

and performance of the business. It also has ultimate responsibility 

deal in the Company’s shares. The share dealing code imposes 

for reviewing and approving all information contained in its annual, 

restrictions beyond those that are imposed by applicable law. 

interim and other reports, ensuring that they present a balanced 

The Company takes all reasonable steps to ensure compliance 

assessment of the Company’s position.

by those parties affected. The Company operates a share dealing 

code, particularly relating to dealing during close periods, for all 

The main channels of communication with shareholders are the 

Board members and certain employees, as is appropriate for a 

Senior Independent Director, Chairman, CEO, CFO and our fi nancial 

listed company. The Company takes all reasonable steps to ensure 

PR advisers, although all directors are open to dialogue with 

compliance by those parties affected.

shareholders as appropriate. The Board encourages communication 

The share dealing code meets the requirements of both the Model 

with all shareholders at any time other than during close periods, 

Code set out in the Listing Rules and the Market Abuse chapter of 

and is willing to enter dialogue with both institutional and private 

the Dutch Act on the fi nancial supervision.

shareholders.

Controlling Shareholder

The Company has a Controlling Shareholder who owns 

approximately 62.52% of the share capital and therefore has 

effective control of the Company. To ensure that all transactions and 

relationships between the Group and the Controlling Shareholder 

are at arm’s length and on a normal commercial basis the Company 

has entered into a relationship agreement with the Controlling 

The Board also actively encourages participation at general 

meetings of shareholders, which is the principal forum for dialogue 

with private shareholders. As well as presentations outlining the 

progress of the business, the Board includes an open question 

and answer session in which individual interests and concerns 

may be addressed. Resolutions put to vote and their results will be 

published following the meeting.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

55

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

The Company’s website (www.plazacenters.com) contains 

(Vaststellingsbesluit nadere voorschriften inhoud jaarverslag) of 23 

comprehensive information about the business, and there is 

December 2004 (as amended) (hereafter the “Decree”).

a dedicated Investor relations section where detailed fi nancial 

information on the Company may be found.

For the statements in this declaration as understood in Articles 3, 3a 

Corporate, social and ethical policies

The Company is responsible not only to its shareholders, but also 

to a range of other stakeholders including employees, customers, 

suppliers and the communities upon whom its operations have an 

impact.

It is therefore the responsibility of the Board to ensure that the 

Company, its directors and its employees act at all time in an 

ethical manner. As a result, the Company seeks to be honest and 

fair in its relations with all stakeholders and to respect the laws and 

sensitivities of all the countries in which it operates.

Environment

and 3b of the Decree, please see the relevant sections of this annual 

report. The following should be understood to be inserts to and 

repetitions of these statements:

•   Compliance with the provisions and best practice principles of the 

Code (pages 50 to 55);

•   The functioning of the Shareholders’ Meeting and its primary 

authorities and the rights of shareholders and how they can be 

exercised (pages 47 and 48);

•   The composition and functioning of the Board and its Committees 

(starting on pages 44, 54 and 55);

•   The regulations regarding the appointment and replacement of 

The Company regards compliance with environmental legislation in 

members of the Board (page 47);

every country where the Group operates as its minimum standard, 

and signifi cant levels of management attention are focused on 

 •  The regulations related to amendment of the Company’s Articles 

ensuring that all employees and contractors achieve and surpass 

of Association (page 48); and

both regulatory and internal environmental standards.

•   The authorizations of the members of the Board in respect of the 

The Company undertakes a detailed environmental impact study of 

possibility to issue or purchase shares (page 47).

every project the Group undertakes, including an audit of its waste 

management, water and energy usage, emissions to air and water, 

ozone depletion and more.

Health and safety

The Company regards compliance with environmental legislation in 

every country where the Group operates as its minimum standard, 

and signifi cant levels of management attention are focused on 

ensuring that all employees and contractors achieve and surpass 

both regulatory and internal environmental standards.

The Company undertakes a detailed environmental impact study of 

every project the Group undertakes, including an audit of its waste 

management, water and energy usage, emissions to air and water, 

ozone depletion and more.

Corporate governance declaration

This declaration is included pursuant to Article 2a of the Decree 

further stipulations regarding the content of annual reports 

56

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Risk 
management

Plaza mainly operates its business in emerging markets and 

confi dence that the Company retains signifi cant value for its 

therefore it is exposed to a relatively high degree of inherent 

stakeholders and will be able to repay its creditors.

risk in such activities. The Management Board is responsible for 

Following the announcement of the Company’s restructuring 

setting fi nancial, operational and strategic objectives as well as for 

programme made on 18 November 2013, Plaza has made good 

implementing risk management according to these objectives.

progress towards resolving its liquidity situation. The market 

The Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and 

restructuring plan and negotiations with the Company’s creditors are 

prices of the Company’s traded debt have reacted positively to the 

analyze the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits 

moving forward. 

and controls and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk 

management policies are reviewed regularly to refl ect changes in 

Alongside the management of the restructuring process, it is vital 

market conditions and the Group’s activities.

that Plaza continues to look to the long-term objectives of the bu-

The Group Audit Committee oversees how management monitors 

Plaza to progress with the initiation of projects and investment as 

compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and 

appropriate, including actively managing its income generating 

procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management 

assets to prepare for their ultimate sale, whilst continuing to identify 

framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.

exit opportunities from its remaining non-core assets.

siness. The deferral of the repayment of its debt maturities enables 

Business strategy and proposed 
restructuring plan

The Company is fl exible on decision making regarding the holding 

and management of centers as opposed to selling them.

Plaza is focused on its businesses in CEE region and India 

Due to the global crisis starting late 2008, the Company adjusted its 

(emerging markets). By nature, various aspects of the emerging 

activity to the markets’ condition and limited the commencement of 

markets are relatively under developed and unstable and therefore 

construction for projects, meeting the two major criteria as follows:

often exposed to risks arising from unforeseen changes, such 

as legal, political, regulatory, and economic changes. Plaza’s 

1  Projects enjoying intensive demand from tenants.

investments in emerging markets expose the Company to a relatively 

high degree of inherent risk.

2  Projects that are based on external bank fi nancing which require 

minimal equity investment.

Whilst the Company witnessed some confi dence returning for 

prospects in Europe’s central and eastern regions, conditions in 

many of its markets remained challenging in 2013 as the persistent 

uncertainty created by the crisis continued to be felt. As such, and 

as announced, despite Plaza’s efforts to progress asset disposals 

and complete some alternative fi nancing transactions, the Company 

took the decision in November 2013 to withhold payment on 

the upcoming short-term maturities of its corporate bonds and 

approach creditors with a restructuring plan. This was undertaken in 

order to resolve its liquidity situation, safeguard the continuity of the 

business and thereby protect the long-term interest of its investors, 

creditors and shareholders.

The fact that Plaza has – to a certain degree – diversifi ed its business 

over different markets (geographic segments) and sectors also 

results in some risk mitigation. The Group is well diversifi ed and 

active in eight countries in CEE and India.

In addition, to ensure knowledge and understanding of its business 

environments, Plaza employs local employees and consultants, and 

in some cases entering into local partnerships.

Capital management

The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to 

maintain investors, creditors and market confi dence and to sustain 

Plaza’s clear priority is to conclude the restructuring process 

future development of the business. The basis of the Company’s 

successfully whilst continuing to leverage the ability and expertise 

stated dividend policy at the time of its IPO was to refl ect the 

of its management team and the quality of the Company’s income 

long-term earnings and cash fl ow potential of the Group, taking into 

generating assets to achieve success in its day-to-day operations. It 

account its capital requirements, whilst at the same time maintaining 

is this combination of factors that underpins the Board’s continued 

an appropriate level of dividend cover.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

57

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

ri

According to the Company’s dividend policy, dividends are expected 

Plaza continued to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet during 

to be paid at the rate of 25% on the fi rst €30 million of such annual 

the period but, as a result of impairment losses recorded in the 

net profi ts and thereafter at the rate of between 20% and 25%, as 

period and fi nance costs incurred, the gearing level increased to 

determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, on any additional 

64% in 2013.

annual net profi ts which exceed €30 million. As published on 

23 September 2011, the dividend for 2012-2013 was subject to 

A prolonged restriction on accessing the capital markets and 

certain caps and conditions, which expired in December 2013.

additional fi nancing negatively affect Plaza’s ability to fund existing 

The Company’s Board of Directors will continue to monitor overall 

market conditions, ongoing committed capital requirements of the 

As Plaza depends on external fi nancing and has high exposure to 

Company, as well as expected future cash fl ow, before considering 

emerging markets, Plaza bears the risks that due to fl uctuations in 

any future dividend payments or payments from the Company’s 

interest rates, exchange rates, selling yields and other indices, its 

and future development projects.

general reserves.

Under the proposed restructuring plan Plaza’s equity will be 

infl uenced, as follows:

The shareholders will be requested to provide capital/monetary 

infl ow to the Company by way of rights issuance (“Equity 

Contribution”) of €20 million as a pre-condition to the coming 

into force of the debt restructuring plan. (It has not been formally 

committed as of 30 April 2014).

The Company shall issue to holders of unsecured debt (i.e. out-

standing debt under the Israeli Series A and B Notes and the Polish 

Notes) (“Unsecured Debt”) 13.5% of the Company’s shares (post the 

Equity Contribution) for no consideration. Such issuance of shares 

will be distributed among the holders of Unsecured Debt pro rata to 

the relative share of each relevant creditor in the Deferred Debt.

fi nancial assets and debt value, cash fl ow, covenants and cost of 

capital will be effected, thereby affecting its ability to raise capital.

As a basis for and contribution to effective risk management and 

to ensure that Plaza will be able to pursue its strategy even during 

periods of economic downturn, Plaza limits its fi nancial risks by 

hedging these risks if and when expedient.

External factors infl uencing the results

The Company’s streaming/fi xed revenues are sensitive to various 

external factors, which infl uence the fi nancial results. Such variables are:

•  Market yield determining the valuation of the investment property, 

and in certain circumstances the need for impairment of trading 

property. The higher the market yields are the less the value 

of the investment property and trading properties are, and the 

probability for impairment is increasing; and

The Board seeks to maintain a balance between the higher returns 

that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the 

advantages and security afforded by a sound capital position.

Financing risk management

•  occupancy rate of the operating malls together with the rental fee 

level defi nes the rental income derived from the shopping center, 

and the other component of the valuation of the investment 

property. Higher occupancy rates and higher rental levels result in 

better operating results, and also in higher revaluation gain from 

Liquidity risk

investment property.

Despite ongoing efforts to complete a number of asset sales and 

secure some alternative fi nancing transactions, Plaza had been 

Interest rate risks

unable to conclude these deals within a timeframe that would 

In view of Plaza’s policy to hold investments for the long-term 

have enabled it to meet those payment obligations. Therefore, to 

while exit yields are high, the loans used to fund this are also taken 

ensure the long-term viability of the business, the Board agreed to 

with long maturities. Plaza uses interest-rate swaps to manage its 

approach the creditors of the Company with a restructuring plan so 

interest-rate risk. This policy regarding the hedging of interest-rate 

that a formalized restructuring process could be implemented. For a 

risk is defensive in nature, with the objective of protecting itself 

general, high-level and non-exhaustive brief summary of the material 

against rising interest rates. 

agreed commercial terms refer to note 34(A) in the consolidated 

The Group incurs certain fl oating rate indebtedness and changes 

fi nancial statements. 

in interest rates may increase its cost of borrowing, impacting on 

58

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
and governance

sk management

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

its profi tability. On a project by project basis, the Group considers 

•  Failure of the restructuring plan to be confi rmed by the Plan 

hedging against interest rate fl uctuations or as sometimes required 

Creditors, may lead to insolvency of the Company

to hedge by the lending bank.

  The restructuring plan purports to enable the Company to 

Foreign currency exchange rates

As Plaza’s functional currency is EUR, it is exposed to risks deriving 

from changes in foreign currency exchange rates as some of its 

purchases of services and construction agreements are conducted 

in local currencies, or are affected by them. Its rental revenues may 

also be denominated in local currencies.

The Group seeks to minimize these risks by ensuring that its 

principal liabilities (fi nancing and construction) and its principal 

sources of revenue (sale proceeds and rentals) are all denominated 

in the same currency (namely the EUR), or are linked to the rate of 

exchange of the local currency and the EUR. In order to limit the 

foreign currency exchange risk in connection with its Debentures 

issued, the Company has hedged the future payments to correlate 

with the Euro under certain cross currency swap arrangements, 

forward transactions and call options in respect of the Series A and 

Series B Debentures previously issued, and may enter into similar 

hedging arrangements (as necessary) in respect of each of the 

Series of Debentures, subject to market conditions.

If the Company is not successful in fully hedging its foreign 

exchange rate exposure, changes in currency exchange rates relative 

to the Euro may adversely affect the Group’s profi t or loss and cash 

fl ows. A devaluation of the local currencies in relation to the EUR, or 

vice versa, may adversely affect the Group’s profi tability.

Furthermore, Plaza is monitoring its currency exposure on a 

continuous basis and acts accordingly by investing in foreign 

currencies in certain cases for which it expects that future 

development projects will be purchased in foreign currency or when 

cash fl ows denominated in foreign currency are needed according to 

project construction budget. As a policy, the Group does not invest 

in foreign currencies for speculative purposes.

The fi nancial statements include additional information about and 

disclosure on Plaza’s use of fi nancial instruments.

The Company’s top risks

The following risks and related mitigation actions, 

where applicable, are reported below:

continue its business operations in the forthcoming future inter 
alia by extending the maturity of certain debt. If the restructuring 
plan is not adopted by the required majority of the relevant 
creditors or is, subsequently, not confi rmed by a fi nal decision of 
the Dutch Court, or if certain undertakings under the restructuring 
plan are not fully executed and on time, the Company may be 
declared bankrupt and enter into liquidation proceedings. It 
is uncertain whether the proceeds from the liquidation of the 
Company’s assets will be suffi cient even to redeem outstanding 
debt. Therefore, in a liquidation scenario, it is not unlikely that the 
holders of Notes or Shares will lose their entire investment.

•  Global fi nancial and economic developments
  Risk description: Plaza’s fi nancial performance refl ects the 

fi nancial turmoil of 2008 continued, as writedowns of trading 
properties are refl ection of the ongoing economic uncertainty 
in many of the countries in which Plaza operates. The global 
economy is still fragile and a very slow pace of recovery cannot 
be excluded. This could jeopardize Plaza’s development project, 
profi tability and cash fl ows as demand and rents for shopping 
and entertainment centers may decline and adversely affect the 
Group’s fi nancial condition, results and prospects. Furthermore, 
economic recession may detrimentally affect the ability of the 
Group (where it has retained a development) to collect rent from 
tenants, which could negatively impact cash fl ow and debt service 
reserve covenants under its fi nancing facilities.

  Risk mitigation: In reaction to the economic downturn, Plaza 

has successfully initiated measures to reduce costs and focus 
on commitment to reposition the business by raising €61 
million through successful disposal of fi ve assets, and restrict 
its commencement of construction projects to only the very 
best opportunities focusing on projects with tenant demand and 
availability of external bank fi nancing which require minimal 
equity investment. Plaza will progress a selected number of 
projects in the most resilient countries of CEE, such as Poland 
and Serbia. These measures have been and will be pursued with 
vigor. Market development will be closely watched and additional 
measures will be taken if necessary. The Company continues 
to make strong progress with its asset management initiatives. 
Occupancy levels across the Company’s existing shopping and 
entertainment centers continued to increase, reaching an overall 
occupancy of 93%, footfall increased by 4% and the average 

monthly turnover increased by 24.5%.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

59

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

ri

•  The Group’s fi nancial performance is dependent on local real 

announcement on 14 November 2013, that it will withhold 

estate prices and rental levels

payment on the upcoming maturities of the Bonds and will 

  Risk description: There can be no guarantee that the real estate 

approach the creditors of the Company with a restructuring plan 

markets in CEE region and India will continue to develop, or 

in a formalized restructuring process.

develop at the rate anticipated by the Group, or that the market 

trends anticipated by the Group will materialize. In case the yields 

  Reduction in the credit ratings of the Group or deterioration in 

will be high, such as some of the current market yields, the Group 

the capital market perception of the Group’s fi nancial resilience, 

will not be able to achieve substantial capital gains by selling the 

could signifi cantly increase its borrowing costs, limit its access to 

commercial centers.

the capital markets and trigger additional collateral requirements 

in derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements. 

  Risk mitigation: Once assets are developed, and given the 

Therefore, any further reduction in credit ratings or deterioration 

Company’s fi nancial strength, Plaza is able to hold developments 

of market perception could materially adversely affect the Group’s 

on its balance sheet as yielding assets. Sales of assets will not be 

access to liquidity and competitive position and, hence, have a 

undertaken if offered yields are high and Plaza will capitalize upon 

material adverse effect on the Group’s business, fi nancial position 

its extensive experience gained over eight years of managing and 

and/or results of operations. These material adverse effects could 

running shopping malls effi ciently to hold and manage these as 

also follow from a reduction in the credit ratings of the Controlling 

income-generating investments in its portfolio, and continue to 

Shareholder.

drive occupancy at these centers until suffi cient offered yields are 

in place, subject to the restructuring plan.

  Risk mitigation: Implementing the offered restructuring plan will 

resolve our liquidity situation. 

•  Real estate valuation is inherently subjective and uncertain

  Risk description: The valuation of property is inherently subjective 

  Plaza is making big efforts to raise external fi nancing for capital 

due to, amongst other things, the individual nature of each 

needs and continues reviewing fi nancing options available to the 

property, and furthermore valuations are sensitive to change in 

Company to achieve the most effective debt profi le.

market sentiment. As such, valuations are subject to uncertainty 

and cash generated on disposals may be different from the value 

  Plaza is actively pursuing sales opportunities to generate cash 

of assets previously carried on the Group’s balance sheet. There 

which will contribute to the Company’s liquidity. The amended 

is no assurance that valuations of properties, when made, will 

maturity schedule of debentures and loans is detailed in the 

refl ect the actual sale prices even where those sales occur shortly 

restructuring plan on page 8.

after the valuation date. This may mean that the value ascribed 

by the Group to the properties held by it may not refl ect the value 

In addition, the Group maintains good relations with the fi nancing 

realized on sale, and that the returns generated by the Group on 

banks who remain supportive of companies with strong track 

disposals of properties may be less than anticipated.

records.

  Risk mitigation: Plaza will rely on its extensive experience and 

•  Plaza may be subject to risk relating to its co-investments, 

knowledge of managing retails assets and strong relationships 

because ownership and control of such investments are shared 

with local and international retailers while using estimates 

with third parties

and associated assumptions. These estimates and underlying 

  Risk description: Some of the Group’s projects (at the date of 

assumptions are closely reviewed on an ongoing basis.

this document, Riga Plaza, Plaza Bas projects, the Casa Radio 

•  The Group’s borrowing costs and access to capital markets 

are held through joint venture arrangements with third parties 

depend signifi cantly on the Company’s credit ratings and 

meaning that ownership and control of such assets is shared 

market perception of the Company’s and the Controlling 

with third parties. As a result, these arrangements involve risks 

Shareholder’s fi nancial resilience

that are not present with projects, in which the Group owns a 

development and two projects in India (Bangalore and Chennai) 

  Risk description: As of April 2014, the Company’s two series of 

controlling interest, including:

Notes are rated “D” by Maalot. The update follows the Company’s 

60

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
and governance

sk management

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

-  the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner might at 

comply with certain limitations, is subject to a governmental 

any time have economic or other business interests that are 

approval. With respect to the real estate sector, these limitations 

inconsistent with the Group’s business interests;

include, among other things, a minimum investment and mini-

-  the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner may be in 

mum size of build-up land. In addition, under the FDI Policy it is 

a position to take action contrary to the Group’s instructions or 

not permitted for foreign investors to acquire agricultural land for 

requests, or contrary to the Group’s policies or objectives, or 

real estate development purposes. There is no assurance that the 

frustrate the execution of acts which the Group believes to be in 

Group will comply with the limitations prescribed in the FDI Policy 

the interests of any particular project;

in order to not be required to receive governmental approvals. 

-  the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner may have 

Failure to comply with the requirements of the FDI Policy will 

different objectives from the Group, including with respect to 

require the Group to receive governmental approvals which it 

the appropriate timing and pricing of any sale or refi nancing of a 

may not be able to obtain or which may include limitations or 

development and whether to enter into agreements with potential 

conditions that will make the investment unviable or impossible, 

contractors, tenants or purchasers;

and non-compliance with investment restrictions may result in the 

-  the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partners may engage 

imposition of penalties. This would have an adverse effect on the 

in, or be perceived to engage in, disreputable conduct;

Group’s business and results of operations.

-  the possibility that the Group’s joint venture partner might 

become bankrupt or insolvent; and

  Risk mitigation: The Company conducts a thorough due diligence 

-  the possibility that the Group may be required to provide fi nance 

procedure and acquires local legal advice prior to concluding any 

to make up any shortfall due to the Group’s joint venture partner 

transaction.

failing to provide such equity fi nance or to furnish collaterals to 

the fi nancing banks.

Legal and regulatory risk

  Disputes or disagreements with any of the Group’s joint venture 

partners could result in signifi cant delays and increased costs 

associated with the development of the Group’s properties. 

Even when the Group has a controlling interest, certain major 

decisions (such as whether to sell, refi nance or enter into a lease 

or contractor agreement and the terms on which to do so) may 

require joint venture partner or other third party approval. If the 

Group is unable to reach or maintain agreement with the joint 

venture partner or other third party on the matters relating to the 

operation of its business, this may have a material adverse effect 

on the Group’s reputation, business, fi nancial condition and/or 

results of operations.

  Risk mitigation: Plaza has very detailed agreements with all of its 

partners that contain provisions that are supposed to limit the 

risks and exposures mentioned above (e.g. deadlock provisions, 

information and visitation rights provisions, etc.). 

•  Limitations by the Indian government to invest in India may 

adversely affect the Group’s business and results of operations

  Risk description: Under the Indian government’s policy on Foreign 

Direct Investment (“FDI Policy”), an acquisition or investment 

by the Group, in an Indian sector or activity in particular in the 

shopping and entertainment centers business, which does not 

Like all international companies, the Company is exposed to the 

changing regulatory environment in the countries and regions where 

it conducts business. Many of the CEE countries in which the Group 

operates or intends to operate are countries that until the last two 

decades were allied with the former Soviet Union under a communist 

economic system, and they are still subject to various risks, which 

may include instability or changes in national or local government 

authorities, land expropriation, changes in taxation legislation or 

regulation, changes to business practices or customs, changes to 

laws and regulations relating to currency repatriation and limitations 

on the level of foreign investment or development. The Group will be 

affected by the rules and regulations regarding foreign ownership of 

real and personal property. 

The Group may be liable for the costs of removal, investigation 

or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances located on or in 

a site owned or leased by it, regardless of whether a member of 

the Group was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or 

toxic substances. The costs of any required removal, investigation 

or remediation of such substances may be substantial and/or 

may result in signifi cant budget overruns and critical delays in 

construction schedules. The presence of such substances, or the 

failure to remediate such substances properly, may also adversely 

affect the Group’s ability to sell or lease the development or to 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

61

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

ri

borrow using the real estate as security. Additionally, any future sale 

Changes to the tax laws or practice in the countries in which the 

of the development will be generally subject to indemnities to be 

Company operates or any other tax jurisdiction affecting the Group 

provided by the Group to the purchaser against such environmental 

could be relevant. Such changes could affect the value of the 

liabilities. Accordingly, the Group may continue to face potential 

investments held by the Company or affect the Company’s ability 

environmental liabilities with respect to a particular property even 

to achieve its investment objective or alter the post-tax returns to 

after such property has been sold. Laws and regulations, as may 

shareholders. The tax positions taken by the Group, including the tax 

be amended over time, may also impose liability for the release of 

effect of transfer pricing and the availability of tax relief provisions, 

certain materials into the air or water from a property, including 

are also subject to review by various tax authorities.

asbestos, and such release can form the basis for liability to third 

Under the Dutch participation exemption rules, income including 

persons for personal injury or other damages. Other laws and 

dividends and capital gains derived by Dutch companies in respect 

regulations can limit the development of, and impose liability for, the 

of qualifying investments in the nominal paid up share capital of 

disturbance of wetlands or the habitats of threatened or endangered 

resident or non-resident investee companies, are exempt from 

species. Any environmental issue may signifi cantly increase the cost 

Dutch corporate income tax provided the conditions as set under 

of a development and/or cause delays, which may have a material 

these rules have been satisfi ed. The participation exemption rules 

adverse effect on the profi tability of that development and the results 

and more particularly the statutory conditions thereunder have 

of operations of the Group. 

most recently been amended with effect of 1 January 2010. Such 

amended conditions require, among others, a minimum percentage 

There is an increasing awareness of environmental issues in 

of the share capital in the investee company requires that the 

Central and Eastern Europe. This may be of critical importance in 

investee company is not held as a passive investment (the ‘motive 

areas previously occupied by the Soviet Army, where soil pollution 

test’). If the motive test is not met, the participation exemption 

may be prevalent. The Group generally insists upon receiving an 

nevertheless applies provided that either the subject-to-tax-test or 

environmental report as a condition for purchase, or alternatively, 

asset test is met. To benefi t from the participation exemption regime 

conducts environmental tests during its due diligence investigations. 

during the entire holding period, the requirements must be met 

Also, some countries such as Poland, Hungary, Romania and the 

throughout the entire holding period. The participation exemption 

Czech Republic require that a developer carries out an environmental 

also applies to qualifying hybrid loans. Should the Company not 

report on the land before building permit applications are 

be in compliance with all participation exemption requirements or 

considered. Nevertheless, the Group cannot be certain that all sites 

should the participation exemption rules be amended, this will affect 

acquired will be free of environmental pollution. If a property that the 

its tax relief which could have an adverse effect on its cash fl ow 

Group acquires turns out to be polluted, such a fi nding will adversely 

position and net profi ts. 

affect the Group’s ability to construct, develop and operate a 

shopping and entertainment center on such property, and may cause 

The Company has provided substantial amounts of loans to its 

the Group to suffer expenses incurred in cleaning up the polluted 

subsidiaries which are treated as hybrid loans and exempt under 

site which may be signifi cant. 

the participation exemption. Most of these loans are not covered 

by a tax ruling confi rming the treatment for Dutch tax purposes. 

While the Group makes every effort to conduct thorough and reliable 

Therefore, there is a risk that a discussion arises with the Dutch tax 

due diligence investigations, in some countries where former 

authorities on the treatment thereof. 

communist regimes carried out extensive land expropriations in 

the past, the Group may be faced with restitution claims by former 

Tax losses may be carried forward and set off against income of 

land owners in respect of project sites acquired by it. If upheld, 

the immediately preceding tax year and the 9 subsequent tax years 

these claims would jeopardise the integrity of its title to the land and 

and may be offset against any income of the companies currently 

its ability to develop the land, which may have a material adverse 

included in the fi scal unity as long as these remain part of the fi scal 

effect on the Group’s business, fi nancial condition and/or results of 

unity. If losses are considered so-called “holding and/or fi nancing 

operations.

losses”, they may only be offset against income that is derived in 

years that the Company also qualifi es as “holding and/or fi nancing 

Relief from taxation available to the Group may not be in accordance 

company” within the meaning of art. 20 (4) of the Dutch corporate 

with the assumptions made by the Company and/or may change. 

income tax Act 1969, provided that the net balance of intragroup 

62

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
and governance

sk management

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

receivables has not increased compared to the relevant loss making 

The system is based on the following three key principles:

year (unless there are suffi cient business reasons for such increase).

•  the involvement of and taking responsibility by all personnel: all 

If the Company were to be treated as having a permanent 

employee, at his or her level, should exercise effective control 

establishment, or as otherwise being engaged in a trade or business 

over the activities for which he or she is responsible;

(including owning real estate outside the Netherlands), in any 

country in which it develops shopping and entertainment centers or 

•  the full extent of the scope covered by the procedures: the 

in which its centers are managed, income (positive and negative) 

procedures should apply to all entities (operational and legal); and

Group employees contribute to internal control procedures; each 

attributable to or effectively connected with such permanent 

establishment or trade or business, is generally excluded from the 

•  separation of tasks: control functions should be independent of 

Dutch tax base. Specifi c conditions may apply based on the relevant 

operating functions.

double taxation treaty and Dutch domestic law.The occurrence of 

one or more of these factors may have a material adverse effect 

The internal control procedures designed to address the objectives 

on the Group’s business, fi nancial condition and/or results of 

described above cannot, however, ensure with certainty that 

operations.

Financial Reporting 

Plaza prepares an annual budget for each country, which budget is 

compared with actual results. Investment budgets and cash fl ow 

forecasts are also prepared. The quarterly fi gures are reviewed by 

the external auditor prior to their publication by means of a press 

release. The fi nancial statements are audited by the external auditor, 

and the semi-annual fi gures are subjected to a limited review by the 

external auditor.

these objectives will be achieved in full, since all procedures have 

inherent limitations. However, they aim to make a very signifi cant 

contribution in this direction.

II) Four components of internal control procedures

a) Organization and environment

Plaza’s internal control procedures distinguish permanent control 

from periodic control, which are independent but complementary. 

Permanent control is the responsibility of all Group employees. It is 

linked directly to the business sectors, functions and subsidiaries.

Internal control and risk management 
procedures

Managers of the business functions, country directors, aim to 

ensure compliance with the Group’s internal control procedures, 

whose tasks are:

I) Defi nition and objectives

•  to ensure the methods chosen at Group level are coordinated and 

Internal control is the structure within which resources, behavior, 

implemented by their teams;

procedures and actions are implemented by the Executive Board 

and throughout the Company to ensure that activities and risks are 

•  to design and adapt the reporting procedures on a regular basis, 

fully controlled and to obtain the reasonable assurance that the 

giving the most appropriate indicators to obtain clear visibility of 

Company’s strategic objectives have been met.

their permanent control; and

Plaza’s internal control procedures aim to ensure: 

•  to regularly transmit this reporting to their superiors and indicate 

•  the optimization of operations and the smooth functioning of the 

problems and incoherences in order to enable appropriate 

Groups internal processes;

decisions to be taken regarding changes to the controls.

•  compliance with current laws and regulations;

The powers of the Group companies’ legal representatives are 

limited and subject to controls. Functional departments provide 

•  the application of instructions and directions given by the 

expertise to operational departments. Permanent control procedures 

Executive Board; and

require several participants. The involvement of many players 

necessitates tight coordination of actions and methods. At Group 

•  the reliability of fi nancial information.

level, the coordination of permanent control is carried out under the 

authority of the Head of Accounting and CFO, whose tasks are:

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

63

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

plaza centers/management 

ri

•  to ensure the design and implementation of actions to improve 

d) Management and supervision of internal control systems

permanent control in the Group’s business functions;

Under the direction of the Executive Board, the activities and 

functions managers carry out the supervision of the internal 

•  to coordinate the choice of methodologies and tools; and 

control system with the support of the permanent control 

•  to monitor the development of the procedures in the business 

per year. Its work and conclusions are reported to the Executive 

coordination function. The Audit Committee meets at least twice 

functions and subsidiaries.

Board. The supervision is also supported by the comments and 

recommendations of the statutory auditors and by any regulatory 

b) Risk management

supervision which may take place.

The Group is careful to anticipate and manage major risks likely 

to affect the achievement of its goals and to compromise its 

III) Risk management and internal control bodies

compliance with current laws and regulations. These risks are 

The main bodies involved in managing the internal control system are:

identifi ed above in this section. The identifi cation and evaluation 

of risks is used as a reference to determine procedures and 

a) Executive Board

controls which, in their turn, infl uence the level of residual risk. The 

The Executive Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s 

procedures provide a framework for the activity, in a more precise 

internal control systems. The Executive Board is tasked with defi ning 

way where risks have been identifi ed, and their application provides 

the general principles of the internal control system, creating and 

a control mechanism.

implementing an appropriate internal control system and associated 

roles and responsibilities, and monitoring its smooth functioning in 

c) Control activities to meet these risks

order to make any necessary improvements.

The internal control and risk management system is based on two 

levels of control as follows:

b) Audit Committee

First level – First degree – Permanent control

of the Group’s entire internal control system, changes made to 

The fi rst level and fi rst degree of control is exercised by every 

the system and the fi ndings of the work carried out by the various 

The Audit Committee is informed at least once a year of the status 

employee as part of his or her job-related tasks with reference to 

participants working in the system.

the applicable procedures. Control is ensured on an ongoing basis 

by the initiation of a task by operating employees themselves or by 

c) Functional management

automatic systems for carrying out operations.

Business unit management defi nes the orientation and procedures 

and provides guidance to employees in their business unit.

First level – Second degree – Permanent control

The second level is exercised by the management of the business 

d) Group employees

function. Controls are carried out in the framework of operating 

Operating supervisors and line managers are responsible for 

procedures.

controlling risks and are the principal actors in permanent control. 

Second level – Permanent control

The second level of control is intended to ensure that the fi rst level 

controls have been carried out and respected correctly. It is under-

taken by separate functions, specially dedicated to permanent control.

Internal accounting control

A dedicated function within the Accounting Department is charged 

with checking the smooth functioning of fi rst level accounting 

controls. See section below “Internal control procedures relating 

to the preparation and processing of the accounting and fi nancial 

information”.

They exercise fi rst level controls.

Internal control procedures relating to 
the preparation and processing of the 
accounting and fi nancial information

I) Defi nition and objectives

The aim of accounting controls is to ensure adequate coverage of 

the main accounting risks. They rely on understanding operational 

processes and the way they are translated into the Company 

accounts, and on defi ning the responsibilities of the individuals 

64

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
and governance

sk management

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

responsible for accounting scopes and information system security. 

outlines in terms of the balance and choice of resources, as well as 

Internal accounting controls aim to ensure:

interest rate and exchange rate hedges. During the year, key fi nancial 

transaction decisions are submitted individually for approval by the 

•  that published accounting and fi nancial information complies with 

Board and Audit Committee, which also receives a summary of these 

accounting regulations;

transactions once they have been completed. The processing and 

centralization of cash fl ows, together with interest rate and exchange 

•  that the accounting principles and instructions issued by the 

rate hedging, are the responsibility of the Financial & Accounting 

Group are applied by all its subsidiary companies; and

Department, which keeps a record of commitments and ensures that 

•  that the information distributed and used internally is suffi ciently 

reliable to contribute to processing accounting information.

III) Processes contributing to the preparation of accounting and 

they are refl ected in the accounting system. 

fi nancial information

II) Management process for accounting and fi nancial organization

a) Operational processes used to generate accounting information

a) Accounting organization

The fi nancial statements of Plaza are prepared centrally at Plaza’s 

The production of accounting information and the application of the 

corporate headquarters. The country departments are responsible 

controls implemented to ensure the reliability of said information are 

for collecting information from the local bookkeepers and applying a 

primarily the responsibility of the Company Financial & Accounting 

series of appropriate controls to their job functions, as defi ned in the 

Department that submit information to the Group, and which 

corresponding procedures. The Accounting Department has set up 

certify its compliance with the internal certifi cation procedure. The 

a system of internal collection and verifi cation of country data and 

corporate and consolidated fi nancial statements are prepared by the 

controls carried out. This system of control covers all Group entities.

Financial & Accounting Department, which reports directly to the 

Executive Board. The department is charged with:

b) Processes used to prepare the corporate and consolidated 

fi nancial statements

•  updating accounting rules in view of changes in accounting 

The fi nancial statements for the entire scope of consolidation are 

regulations;

consolidated by the Accounting Department. At the end of each year, 

the Executive Board validates the provisional fi nancing plan for the 

•  defi ning the various levels of accounting control to be applied to 

following year, which sets out the broad outlines in terms of the 

the fi nancial statement preparation process;

balance and choice of resources, as well as interest rate hedges. 

During the year, key fi nancial transaction decisions are submitted 

•  ensuring correct operation of the internal accounting control 

individually for approval. The processing and centralization of cash 

environment within the Group, with particular reference to the 

fl ows, together with interest rate and exchange rate hedging, are the 

internal certifi cation procedure described below;

responsibility of the Investment Committee, which keeps a record of 

commitments and ensures that they are refl ected in the accounting 

•  preparing and updating the procedures, validation rules and 

system.

authorization rules applying to the department; and

c) The Audit Committee

•  monitoring the implementation of recommendations made by 

The clarity of fi nancial information and the relevance of the 

external auditors.

accounting principles used are monitored by the Audit Committee 

(whose role has already been specifi ed).

b) Financial risk management

The management of fi nancial risks, and in particular the fi nancial 

structure of the Group, its fi nancing needs and interest rate and 

exchange rate risk management procedures, is provided by the Finan-

cial & Accounting Department, which reports directly to the Executive 

Board. At the end of each year, the Board validates the provisional 

fi nancing plan for the following year, which sets out the broad 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

65

 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Remuneration 
report

Remuneration Committee

Remuneration policy

As stated in the Corporate Governance report on pages 50 to 56 of 
this document, the Remuneration Committee meets at least twice each 
fi nancial year to prepare, among other matters, the decision of the Board 
relating to the remuneration of directors and any share incentive 
plans. It is also responsible for preparing an annual report on the 
Company’s remuneration policies and for giving full consideration in 
all its deliberations to the principles set out in the Combined Code.

The committee comprises three non-executive directors – it is 
chaired by Shimon Yitzchaki and the other members are Marius van 
Eibergen Santhagens and Marco Wichers.

Under Dutch corporate law and the Articles of the Company, a 
General Meeting of Shareholders must determine the principal 
guidelines governing the remuneration both of executive and non-
executive directors. In addition, such a meeting also has to approve 
the granting to them of options and share incentive plans.

The Board may only determine the remuneration of directors within 
such guidelines, and no director or manager may be involved in any 

decisions relating to his or her own remuneration.

Plaza Centers’ remuneration policy is designed to attract, 

motivate and retain the high-calibre individuals who will enable the 

Company to serve the best interests of shareholders over the long-

term, through delivering a high level of corporate performance. 

Remuneration packages are aimed at balancing both short-term 

and long-term rewards, as well as performance and nonperformance 

related pay.

The Remuneration Committee reviews base salaries annually. 

Increases for all employees are recommended by reference to cost 

of living, responsibilities and market rates, and are performed at the 

same time of year.

The Remuneration Committee believes that any director’s total 

remuneration should aim to recognize his or her worth on the open 

market and to this end pays base salaries in line with the market 

median supplemented by a performance-related element with the 

capacity to provide more than 50% of total potential remuneration.

2013

Executive directors

Mr Mordechay Zisser

Mr Ran Shtarkman

Subtotal

Non-executive directors

Mr Shimon Yitzchaki

Mr Marius van Eibergen Santhagens

Mr Edward Paap**

Mr Marco Wichers (Chairman)

Mr Sarig Shalhav***

Subtotal

Total – All directors

Salary and fees

incentive plan*

for the year ended

€’000

€’000

13 December 2013 €’000

Share

Total remuneration

222

452

674

-

67.7

65.7

67.7

2

203

877

-

-

-

112

-

-

-

-

112

112

222

452

674

112

67.7

65.7

67.7

2

315

989

There were no performance related remuneration in 2013.
*   Accounting non-cash expenses recorded in the Company’s consolidated income statement 

** Period from 1 January 2013 until 19 December 2013
***  Period from 19 December 2013 until 31 December 2013

in connection with the share option plan.

35

28

21

14

7

0

The shareholder returns performance 2013

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

66

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Service arrangements

The executive directors have rolling service contracts with the Company, 

which may be terminated on 12 months’ and three months’ notice.

The non-executive directors have specifi c terms of reference. Their 

letters of appointment state an initial 12-month period, terminable 

by either party on three months’ written notice. Save for payment 

during respective notice periods, these agreements do not provide 

for payment on termination.

Bonuses

directors also have the authority to award discretionary bonuses 

to outstanding employees which are not linked to the Company’s 

fi nancial results.

Share options

The Company adopted its Share Option Schemes (“First ESOP”) 

on 26 October 2006 (which was amended on 25 November 2008, 

22 November 2011 and 20 November 2012) and on 22 November 

2011 (“Second ESOP”) (refer to note 25 to the consolidated 

fi nancial statements) the terms and conditions of which (except for 

the exercise price) are regulated by the Share Option Schemes.

The Company has a performance-linked bonus policy for senior 

Options will vest in three equal annual portions and have a 

executives and employees, under which up to 3% of net annual 

contractual life of fi fteen and ten years following grant date for 

profi ts are set aside for allocation by the directors to employees 

First ESOP and Second ESOP, respectively. In the course of 2013, 

on an evaluation of their individual contributions to the Company’s 

1,650,000 options were granted under second ESOP. For the 

performance. In addition, the Board can award ad hoc bonuses 

exercise and forfeit of options refer to the table below.

to project managers, area managers and other employees on 

For further detailed information about share option schemes refer 

the successful completion and/or opening of each project. The 

to note 25 in the consolidated fi nancial statements.

Number

Number exercisable

of options granted

as at 31 December,

and unexercised

2012 and 2013

Exercise

price of

options £

Remaining

maturity

(years)

Mr Mordechay Zisser

Mr Ran Shtarkman

Mr Shimon Yitzchaki

Mr Marius van Eibergen Santhagens

Mr Edward Paap

Mr Marco Wichers

3,907,895

7,089,151

1,794,361

-

-

-

3,907,895

7,089,151

1,127,695*

-

-

-

0,43

0,43

0,43

-

-

-

7.8

7.8

7.8

-

-

-

Number of options

as at 31 December 

2013

47,834,586

47,195,174

8,420,598

(13,883,438)

14,522,850

Total pool

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

Left for future grant

* As at 31 December 2012: 827,695

Amsterdam, 30 April 2014                                 

The Board of Directors

Mordechay Zisser 

Marius van Eibergen Santhagens 

Ran Shtarkman 

Marco Wichers 

Shimon Yitzchaki

Sarig Shalhav

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

67

 
 
 
 
E
C
N
A
N
R
E
V
O
G

D
N
A

T
N
E
M
E
G
A
N
A
M

Statement
of the directors

The responsibilities of the directors are determined by applicable law 
and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted 
by the European Union.

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual report and the 
annual fi nancial statements in accordance with applicable law and 
regulations.

On the basis of the above and in accordance with Best Practice Provision 

II.1.4. of the Netherlands Corporate Governance Code, the directors 

confi rm that internal controls over fi nancial reporting within the Company 

provide a reasonable level of assurance that the fi nancial reporting does 

not contain any material inaccuracies, and confi rm that these controls 

functioned properly in the year under review and that there are no 

indications that they will not continue to do so.

Netherlands law requires the directors to prepare fi nancial statements 
for each fi nancial year that give, according to generally acceptable 
standards, a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, fi nancial 
position and profi t or loss of the Company and the companies that 
are included in its consolidated accounts for that period.
Netherlands law requires the directors to prepare an Annual report 
that gives a true and fair view of the position as per the balance 
sheet date, the course of business during the past fi nancial year 
of the Company and its affi liated companies included in the annual 
fi nancial statements, and that the Annual report contains a proper 
description of the principal risks the company faces.

Directors are required to abide by certain guidelines in undertaking 
these tasks.

The directors need to select appropriate accounting policies and 
apply them consistently in their reports. They must state whether 
they have followed applicable accounting standards, disclosing and 
explaining any material departures in the fi nancial statements.
Any judgments and estimates that directors make must be both 
reasonable and prudent. The directors must also prepare fi nancial 
statements on a “going concern” basis, unless it is inappropriate to 
presume that the Company will continue in business.
The directors confi rm that they have complied with the above 
requirements in preparing the fi nancial statements.
Throughout the fi nancial year, the directors are responsible for 
keeping proper accounting records which disclose at any time and 
with reasonable accuracy the fi nancial position of the Company. 
They are also responsible for ensuring that these statements comply 
with applicable company law.

In addition, they are responsible for internal control systems that 
help identify and address the commercial risks of being in busi-
ness, and so safeguard the assets of the Company. They are also 
responsible for taking reasonable steps to enable the detection and 
prevention of fraud and other irregularities.

The Company’s website may be accessed in many countries, which 
have different legal requirements. The directors are responsible for 
maintaining the accuracy of corporate and fi nancial information on 
the website, where a failure to update or amend information may 
cause inappropriate decision making.

The fi nancial statements fairly represent the Company’s fi nancial 

condition and the results of the Company’s operations and provide 

the required disclosures.

It should be noted that the above does not imply that these systems 

and procedures provide absolute assurance as to the realization 

of operational and strategic business objectives, or that they can 

prevent all misstatements, inaccuracies, errors, fraud and non-

compliance with legislation, rules and regulations.

In view of all of the above, hereby following the requirements of 

article 5:25c paragraph 2 under c. of the Netherlands Act on the 

fi nancial supervision (Wet op het fi nancieel toezicht), the directors 

hereby confi rm that (i) the annual fi nancial statements 2013, as 

included herein, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 

fi nancial position and profi t or loss of the company and its affi liated 

companies that are included in the consolidated fi nancial statements; 

and (ii) the Annual report includes a fair review of the position at the 

balance sheet date and the development and performance of the bu-

siness of the Company and its affi liated companies that are included 

in the consolidated annual fi nancial statements and that the principal 

risks and uncertainties that the company faces are described.

The Board of managing directors 

Mordechay Zisser

Executive Director and Founder

Shimon Yitzchaki 

Non-executive Director

Sarig Shalhav

Non-executive Director

Ran Shtarkman

Executive Director and CEO

Marco Habib Wichers

Independent Non-executive Director and Chairman

Marius Willem van Eibergen Santhagens

Independent Non-executive Director                              30 April 2014

68

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

A
N
D

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

Suwałki Plaza, Poland

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

69

 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

Independent 
auditors’ report

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Plaza Centers N.V.

Report on the consolidated fi nancial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial statements of Plaza Centers N.V. (“the Company”), which comprise the consolidated 
statement of fi nancial position as at 31 December 2013, the consolidated statement of profi t or loss and the consolidated statements of 
comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash fl ows for the year then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of signifi cant accounting 
policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated fi nancial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated fi nancial statements in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to 
enable the preparation of consolidated fi nancial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated fi nancial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in 
accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform 
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated fi nancial statements. 
The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated fi nancial 
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation 
and fair presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, 
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the 
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the 
overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated fi nancial position of the Company 
as at 31 December 2013 and of its consolidated fi nancial performance and its consolidated cash fl ows for the year then ended in accordance 
with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU.

Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to note 2(d) and note 34(a) in the consolidated fi nancial statements which describes, 
among other matters, that the Company has withheld payment of installments on the Polish bonds as well as the Israeli bonds; and that the 
Company fi led for reorganization proceedings with the District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. These conditions, along with other 
matters as set forth in note 2(d) and note 34(a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast signifi cant doubt about the 
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Without qualifying our opinion, we also draw attention to note 3(g) and note 14 to the consolidated fi nancial statements which describes 
that the Company early adopted IFRS 11 Joint arrangements with a date of initial application of 1 January 2013 and the effect thereof on the 
consolidated fi nancial statements.

KPMG Hungária Kft.

Michael Carlson 
Partner  

70

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

Budapest, Hungary 
27 March 2014 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Consolidated 
statement of 
fi nancial position

December 31, 2013 
€’000 

December 31, 2012 
Restated* €’000 

January 1, 2012
Restated* €’000

26,157 
6,319 
- 
- 
1,246 
3,372 
4,871 
1,393 
40,333 

83,691 

454,841 
- 
33,102 
7,039 
- 
6,520 
- 
573 

502,075 

585,766 

175,338 
97,983 
70,636 
2,432 
944 
910 
15,597 
11,219 

375,059 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
379 

379 

2,972 
(40,651) 
(20,706) 
35,133 
261,773 
(28,799) 

209,722 

606 

210,328 

585,766 

35,374 
18,759 
- 
11,714 
- 
3,399 
11,492 
7,821 
612,475 

701,034 

- 
- 
154,830 
6,949 
- 
7,381 
14,489 
1,135 

184,784 

885,818 

205,977 
34,966 
34,184 
7,569 
546 
3,320 
15,597 
7,648 

309,807 

5,773 
81,181 
39,010 
- 
185 
6,930 

133,079 

2,972 
(26,359) 
(20,706) 
35,262 
261,773 
189,274 

442,216 

716 

442,932 

885,818 

51,438
17,440
3,102
25,568
-
2,792
8,721
8,043
648,674

765,778

-
95,475
141,174
15,160
50,577
8,230
13,652
5,221

329,489

1,095,267

208,858
32,930
22,831
25,712
2,228
-
15,597
15,261

323,417

15,696
110,320
86,052
3,561
159
13,189

228,977

2,972
(10,672)
(19,342)
31,954
261,773
275,437

542,122

751

542,873

1,095,267

Note 

6 
7 

8 
8 
9 
10a 
10b 
11 

11 
37 
14 
14 

12 
13 

16 
20 
21 
17 
18 
15 
11 
19 

16 
20 
21 
15 

22 

23 
23 

23 

ASSETS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Restricted bank deposits 
Short-term deposits 
Available for sale fi nancial assets 
Held for trading fi nancial assets 
Trade receivables 
Other receivables 
Prepayments and advances 
Trading properties 

Total current assets 

Trading properties 
Equity accounted investee - discontinued operations 
Equity accounted investees 
Loan to equity accounted investees 
Long-term deposits and other investments 
Property and equipment 
Investment property 
Other non-current assets 

Total non-current assets 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Trade payables 
Related parties liabilities 
Derivatives 
Provisions 
Other  liabilities 

Total current liabilities 

Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Derivatives 
Other liabilities 
Deferred tax liabilities 

Total non-current liabilities 

Share capital 
Translation reserve 
Capital reserve due to transaction with Non-controlling interests 
Other reserves 
Share premium 
Retained earnings (losses) 

Total equity attributable to equity holders of the Company 

Non-controlling interests 

Total equity 

Total equity and liabilities 

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards 

Date of approval of the fi nancial statements: 27 March 2014 
The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these  
consolidated fi nancial statements. 

Ran Shtarkman 
Director, President and Chief 
Executive Offi cer 

Shimon Yitzchaki
Director and Chairman 
of the Audit Committee

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

Consolidated 
statement of 
profi t or loss

Continuing operations 

Rental income 

Revenues from entertainment centers 

Total revenues 

Cost of operations 

Cost of operations – entertainment centers 

Gross profi t 

Loss from disposal of undeveloped Trading Property 

Write-down of Trading Properties 

Write-down of equity-accounted investees 

Loss from disposal of equity accounted investees 

(holding undeveloped Trading Properties) 

Share in results of equity-accounted investees 

Administrative expenses, excluding restructuring costs 

Restructuring costs 

Other income 

Other expenses 

Results from operating activities 
Finance income 

Finance costs 

Net fi nance costs 

Loss before income tax 
Tax benefi t 

Loss from continuing operations 

Discontinued operation 
Profi t (loss) from discontinued operation, net of tax 

Loss for the year 

Loss attributable to:  
Owners of the Company 
Earnings per share 
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO) 
Earnings per share – continuing operations 
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO) 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

23,678 
3,345 

27,023 

(9,408) 
(4,025) 

13,590 

(346) 
(117,913) 
(56,417) 

(3,724) 
952 
(9,435) 
(702) 
413 
(11,468) 

(185,050) 
1,288 
(40,632) 

(39,344) 

(224,394) 
6,256 

(218,138) 

65 

(218,073) 

23,112

6,911 

30,023

(9,384)

(8,267)

12,372

(65)

(60,293)

(23,443)

-

1,475

(11,432)

-

8,970

(1,122)

(73,538)

20,358

(37,531)

(17,173)

(90,711)

6,592

(84,119)

(2,044)

(86,163)

(218,073) 

(86,163)

(0.73) 

(0.73) 

(0.29)

(0.28)

Note 

26(a) 

26(b) 

27(a) 

27(b) 

34(e) 

11 

14 

34(d),(f) 

14 

28a 

28b 

29 

29 

30 

30 

31 

37 

24 

24 

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards and to notes 27, 28 and 29 on other reclassifi cations.

The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. 

72

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Consolidated 
statement of 
comprehensive 
income

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

(218,073) 

(86,163)

Loss for the year 

Other comprehensive income 

Items that are or may be reclassifi ed to profi t or loss: 

Net change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets transferred to income statement 

Change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets 

Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Discontinued operation) – reclassifi ed to profi t or loss 

Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Discontinued operation) – 2012 movements 

(723) 

(14) 

- 

- 

Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Equity accounted investees) – reclassifi ed to profi t or loss 

4,360 

Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Equity accounted investees) 

Foreign currency translation differences - foreign operations (Trading properties) 

Tax on other comprehensive income due to change in fair value of available for sale fi nancial assets 

Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year, net of income tax 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year 

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to: 

Owners of the Company: 

Non-controlling interests 

(15,036) 

(3,726) 

184 

(14,955) 

(233,028) 

(232,918) 

(110) 

1,222

1,297

(9,730)

2,818

-

(7,064)

(1,746)

(630)

(13,833)

(99,996)

(99,961)

(35)

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

(233,028) 

(99,996) 

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

Consolidated 
statement of 
changes in equity

 Attributable to the equity holders of the Company 

Capital 

 reserve from 

 acquisition of 

 non-controlling   Financial

interests  

assets

without  

available 

Retained 

Non-

Share 

based 

Share 

Share 

payment  Translation 

a change  

for sale 

earnings 

   controlling 

capital 

premium 

reserves 

reserve 

in control 

reserve 

(losses)  

Total 

interests* 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

€’000 

Total

€’000

Balance at January 1, 2012,

as previously reported 

2,972 

261,773 

33,290 

(10,672) 

(19,342) 

(1,336) 

275,437 

542,122 

8,040 

550,162

Impact of changes in 

accounting policies 

Restated balance at 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(7,289) 

(7,289)

January 1, 2012 

2,972 

261,773 

33,290 

(10,672) 

(19,342) 

(1,336) 

275,437 

542,122 

751 

542,873

Change in non-controlling interest  - 

- 

- 

- 

(1,364) 

Share based payment 

(refer to note 25) 

-   

-   

1,419 

Comprehensive income for the year 

Net loss for the year 

Foreign currency translation 

differences 

Available for sale reserve, 

net of tax 

Total comprehensive income 

(loss) for the year 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Balance at 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Share based payment 

(refer to note 25) 

-   

-   

424 

Comprehensive income for the year 

Net loss for the year 

Foreign currency 

translation differences 

Available for sale reserve, 

net of tax 

Total comprehensive 

loss for the year 

Balance at 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(15,687) 

-   

- 

(15,687) 

- 

-   

- 

(14,292) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(14,292) 

- 

-   

- 

- 

- 

(1,364) 

-   

1,419 

(86,163) 

(86,163) 

- 

- 

- 

(1,364)

1,419

(86,163)

-  

(15,687) 

(35) 

(15,722)

1,889 

- 

1,889 

- 

1,889 

1,889 

(86,163) 

(99,961) 

(35) 

(99,996)

-   

- 

- 

- 

- 

-   

- 

- 

- 

- 

-   

- 

- 

-   

424 

(218,073) 

(218,073)  

- 

- 

424

(218,073) 

-  

(14,292) 

(110) 

(14,402)

(553) 

- 

(553) 

- 

(553)

(553) 

(218,073) 

(232,918) 

(110) 

(233,028)

December 31, 2012 

2,972 

261,773 

34,709 

(26,359) 

(20,706) 

553 

189,274 

442,216 

716 

442,932

December 31, 2013 

2,972 

261,773 

35,133 

(40,651) 

(20,706) 

- 

(28,799) 

209,722 

606 

210,328

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards

The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. 

74

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Consolidated 
statement of 
cash fl ows 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Note 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

(218,073) 

(86,163)

12 

13 

30 

14 

31 

11 

12 

34(e) 

34(h) 

8 

8 

423 

4,267 

39,344 

424 

(65) 

(23) 

78,617 

(6,256) 

1,065

(837)

17,173

197

2,044

(13)

19,854

(6,592) 

(101,342) 

(53,272)

(122) 

10,126 

108,831 

(4,028) 

3,498 

118,305 

353 

(10,926) 

(295) 

6,095 

(75) 

169 

- 

7,649 

32,410 

- 

(1,424) 

12,012 

- 

50,741 

(581)

5,821

27,632

(18,122)

(8,577) 

6,173

3,822

(24,214)

(297)

(67,788)

(462) 

250

63,885

- 

-

50,643

(16,089)

31,294

3,102

132,623

Cash fl ows from operating activities 

Loss for the year 

Adjustments necessary to refl ect cash fl ows used in operating activities: 

Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment  

Change in fair value of investment property 

Net fi nance costs 

Equity-settled share-based payment transaction 

Discontinued operations 

Gain on sale of property and equipment 

Share of loss of equity-accounted investees, net of tax 

Tax benefi t 

Subtotal 

Changes in: 

Trade receivables 

Other accounts receivable 

Trading properties  

Trade payables 

Other liabilities, related parties liabilities and provisions 

Subtotal 

Interest received  

Interest paid 

Taxes paid 

Net cash from (used in) operating activities 

Cash from investing activities 

Purchase of property and equipment 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 

Discontinued operations 

Proceeds from sale of  investment property 

Proceeds from liquidation of equity accounted investee EPUS 

Long-term deposits redemption 

Purchase of marketable debt securities fi nancial assets 

Proceeds from sale of available for sale fi nancial assets 

Short-term deposits, net 

Net cash from investing activities 

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards and to notes 27, 28 and 29 on other reclassifi cations.

The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

Cash from fi nancing activities 

Proceeds from bank loans and fi nancial institutions 

Proceeds from utilization and settlement of derivatives 

Proceeds (payments) from hedging activities through sell of options 

Repurchase of debentures 

Changes in restricted cash 

Proceeds from re-issuance of long-term debentures 

Repayment of debentures  

Repayment of interest bearing loans from banks 

Net cash used in fi nancing activities 

Effect of movement in exchange rate fl uctuations on cash held 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the year 

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 of January 

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 of December 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Note 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

15 

20, 21 

20, 21 

16 

659 

- 

(2,364) 

- 

9,316 

13,772 

(60,319) 

(27,490) 

(66,426) 

373 

(9,217) 

35,374 

26,157 

46,720

238

11,683

(18,814)

(1,796)

-

(65,320)

(53,554) 

(80,843)

(56)

(16,064)

51,438

35,374

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards

The notes on pages 75 to 152 are an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. 

76

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Notes to the 
consolidated 
fi nancial 
statements

NOTE 1 - PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND OWNERSHIP 

Plaza Centers N.V. (“the Group” or “the Company”) was incorporated and is registered in the Netherlands.  The Company’s registered offi ce is at Prins Hendrikkade 
48-S, 1012 AC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The Company conducts its activities in the fi eld of establishing, operating and selling of shopping and entertainment 
centers, as well as other mixed-use projects (retail, offi ce, residential) in Central and Eastern Europe (starting 1996), India (from 2006), and, between 2010 and 
2012, also in the USA. The consolidated fi nancial statements for each of the periods presented comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as 
the “Group”) and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly controlled entities. 

The Company is dual listed on the Main Board of the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”) and, starting October 2007, on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (“WSE”).  

The Company’s immediate parent company is Elbit Ultrasound (Luxembourg) B.V. / S.à r.l. (“EUL”), which holds 62.5% of the Company’s shares, as at the end of 
the reporting period (December 31, 2012 – 62.5%). The ultimate parent company is Elbit Imaging Limited (“EI”).  For the list of the Group entities, refer to note 39.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PREPARATION

a. Statement of compliance

The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as adopted by the European 
Union (“EU”).

These consolidated fi nancial statements are not intended for statutory fi ling purposes. The Company is required to fi le consolidated fi nancial statements prepared 
in accordance with The Netherlands Civil Code. At the date of approving these fi nancial statements the Company had not yet prepared consolidated fi nancial 
statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 in accordance with the Netherlands Civil Code. 

The consolidated fi nancial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2014.

b. Basis of measurement

The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the following material items in the statement of the fi nancial 
position:

Investment properties were measured at fair value

• 
•  Liabilities for cash-settled share-based payment arrangements are measured at fair value
•  Available for sale fi nancial assets are measured at fair value
•  Derivative fi nancial instruments are measured at fair value
•  Non-Derivative fi nancial instruments at fair value through profi t or loss are measured at fair value.

c. Functional and presentation currency

These consolidated fi nancial statements are presented in EURO (“EUR”), which is the Company’s functional currency. All fi nancial information presented in EUR 
has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated.

d. Going concern

On November 14, 2013 the Company announced that it would be freezing payments to all its lenders and would be entering into negotiations with these creditors 
to arrive at an agreed debt arrangement (restructuring plan). The Company’s proposed debt arrangement, updated March 26, 2013, includes an equity injection 
from the owners in the amount of circa 20 million EUR via a rights issuance (“Equity Contribution”), a delay of all the bond series’ principal payment by three 
years, a realization plan under which 19 of the 29 assets are estimated to be realized by 2018 for circa 490 million EUR (net proceeds, being mainly net of asset 
specifi c borrowings and taxes), a transfer of 75% of the net proceeds of realizations to the bondholders as early repayment, compensate the bondholders with an 
additional 1.5% annual interest, and additional compensation to the bondholders by share issuance (without additional proceeds), in a total of 13.5% (post the 
Equity Contribution) of the Company’s outstanding shares.

Management believes that the implementation of the restructuring plan will provide the Company with the ability to resolve its immediate liquidity situation in 
order to continue operating as going concern and preserve value for its shareholders and creditors.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

77

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Management acknowledges that material uncertainty remains over the Group’s ability to meet its funding requirements and to refi nance or repay its debts as 
they fall due. If for any reason the Group is unable to reach an approved restructuring plan, and  more specifi cally, if the Group will not be able to raise EUR 20 
million equity from shareholders which is a pre-condition to the debt restructuring plan approval (refer to note 34(A) section ‘To shareholders’) then this would 
likely have an adverse impact on the Group’s ability to realise assets at their recognised values, and to extinguish liabilities in the normal course of business at the 
amounts stated in the consolidated fi nancial statements and ultimately result in the Group being unable to continue as a going concern. The consolidated fi nancial 
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Group will be able to successfully complete its proposed debt arrangement as 
further discussed in note 34(A).

e. Investment property vs. trading property classifi cation

The Company has designated its properties into three types (completed trading property projects, plots scheduled for construction and plots under planning 
stage).   

In respect of its completed trading property projects, and as written above, the Company still faces material uncertainties in respect of the time needed to sell the 
properties. However the Group has not changed its business model and is actively seeking buyers.  Therefore it is clear from the Company’s perspective that these 
completed properties are trading properties, rather than investment properties.

In respect of plots under planning stage held, which are not intended to be constructed in the near future, the Company is actively looking for buyers and does not 
hold the plots passively with the intention to gain from a potential value increase.  Plots scheduled for construction are intended to be developed and sold in the 
normal course of business once circumstances allow. Therefore the Company also believes that these are appropriately classifi ed as trading properties.    

f. Use of estimates and judgments

The preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in conformity with IFRS as adopted by the EU requires management to make judgments, estimates and 
assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. 

The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the 
circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other 
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is 
revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. 

Information about other critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most signifi cant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated 
fi nancial statements is included in the following note:

•  Note 11 – Suspension of borrowing costs capitalization 
•  Note 11 – Classifi cation of trading properties as current vs. non-current 
•  Note 11 – Trading property vs. Investment property

Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a signifi cant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next fi nancial year are 
included in the following notes:

•  Notes 11 – Key assumptions used in determining the net realisable value of trading properties 
•  Note 11, 33 – Provisions and contingencies 
•  Note 25 – Measurement of share-based payments 

Functional currency

The EUR is the functional currency for Group companies (with the exception of Indian companies – in which the functional currency is the Indian Rupee – INR, 
and the investment in the USA held until June 30, 2012  - in which the functional currency was the USD) since it is the currency of the economic environment 
in which the Group operates. This is because the EUR (and in India and the USA – the INR and USD, respectively) is the main currency in which management, 
determines its pricing with tenants, potential buyers and suppliers, determine its fi nancing activities and budgets and assesses its currency exposures.

78

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 2 / note 3

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Operating cycle determination

The Normal Operating Cycle (“NOC”) of the Group is driven by its business model to buy, develop and sell, primarily shopping centers, and comprises the 
estimated amount of time required to complete the process from the acquisition of undeveloped land through its development, preparation for sale and ultimate 
disposal. Based on the Group’s experience, mainly from the period from 1996-2008, this period of time was three to fi ve years (and in respect of large scale, 
multi-phase/mixed-use projects, up to eight years). For example, for completed shopping centers, these steps include achieving a stabilized tenants list, improving 
the tenant mix, increasing occupancy rates, completion of certain tenant improvements and fi nding the qualifi ed buyers. For plots, this includes obtaining permits, 
fi nance and construction. 

The Company maintains its existing business model; however with the fi nancial crisis as background the level of uncertainty of the actual amount of time needed 
to complete all steps in the process has become much higher than what the Company believes is a normal level. 

Over the period 2009 – 2012, the Company has had diffi culty selling completed properties at prices refl ecting management’s view of reasonable estimated values, 
as well as experienced a lack of available fi nance for development of plots. The return to what management considers more normal conditions, primarily in the 
CEE markets where it has properties, has been longer than expected.

In view of these uncertainties and abnormalities, the Company has taken a position of reclassifying its entire trading properties asset to long-term, with the 
exception of a property where a sale and purchase agreement exists as described in note 11, until the abnormal level of uncertainty is reduced. 

NOTE 3 - CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Except for the changes below, the Group has consistently applied the accounting policies set out in note 4 to all periods presented in these consolidated fi nancial 
statements.

The Group has adopted the following new standards and amendments to standards, including any consequential amendments to other standards, with a date of 
initial application of 1 January 2013:

a.  IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (2011) – early adoption
b.  IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements – early adoption
c.  IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities – early adoption
d.  IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
e.  Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (Amendments to IAS 1)

(a) Subsidiaries

As a result of IFRS 10 (2011), the Group has changed its accounting policy for determining whether it has control over and consequently whether it consolidates 
its investees. IFRS 10 (2011) introduces a new control model that focuses on whether the Group has power over an investee, exposure or rights to variable 
returns from its involvement with the investee and ability to use its power to affect those returns.

In accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 10 (2011), the Group reassessed the control conclusion for its investees at 1 January 2013, and concluded 
that there has been no impact on the recognised assets, liabilities and comprehensive income of the Group.

(b) Joint arrangements

Joint arrangements provides for a more realistic refl ection of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, rather than its 
legal form. There are two types of joint arrangement: joint operations and joint ventures. Joint operations arise where a joint operator has right to the assets and 
obligations relating to the arrangement and hence accounts for its interest in assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Joint ventures arise where the joint operator 
has rights to the net assets of the arrangement and hence equity accounts for its interest. Proportional consolidation of joint ventures is no longer allowed. 

As a result of IFRS 11, the Group has changed its accounting policy for its interests in joint arrangements. Under IFRS 11, the Group has classifi ed its interests in 
joint arrangements as either joint operations (if the Group has rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to an arrangement) or joint ventures 
(if the Group has rights only to the net assets of an arrangement). 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

79

 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

When making this assessment, the Group considered the structure of the arrangements, the legal form of any separate vehicles, the contractual terms of the 
arrangements and other facts and circumstances. Previously, the structure of the arrangement was the sole focus of classifi cation. The Group has re-evaluated 
its involvement in its various joint arrangements and, deeming them to be joint ventures rather than joint operations because in all cases the parties that have 
joint control of the arrangement (i.e. joint ventures) have rights to the net assets of the arrangement rather than to the assets and liabilities of the arrangement, 
therefore, the Group has changed the accounting treatment for all its jointly controlled entities (previously accounted according to proportional consolidation 
method) to be accounted for as joint ventures applying the equity method, thus impacting the recognised assets, liabilities and comprehensive income of the 
Group.   

The quantitative impact of the change is set out in (g) below.

(c) Disclosure of interests in other entities

As a result of IFRS 12, the Group has expanded its disclosures about its equity-accounted investees (refer to note 14). The Group does not have interests in 
unconsolidated structured entities.

(d) Fair value measurement

IFRS 13 establishes a single framework for measuring fair value and making disclosures about fair value measurements when such measurements are required 
or permitted by other IFRSs. It unifi es the defi nition of fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly 
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

It replaces and expands the disclosure requirements about fair value measurements in other IFRSs, including IFRS 7. As a result, the Group has included 
additional disclosures in this regard (refer to notes 11, 14).  In addition, due to the signifi cant impact of the valuation of Trading properties on their carrying 
amounts the Group has included additional disclosures similar to those required by this standard in note 11.

(e) Presentation of items of OCI

As a result of the amendments to IAS 1, the Group has modifi ed the presentation of items of OCI in its statement of profi t or loss and OCI, to present separately 
items that would be reclassifi ed to profi t or loss from those that would never be. Comparative information has been re-presented accordingly.

(f) Materiality considerations

Material joint ventures are considered equity accounted investees existing as of December 31, 2013 which their total assets approximates 5 percent of the total 
consolidated assets as of December 31, 2013 and/or December 31, 2012, or its revenues exceeded 15 per cent of the total consolidated revenues for the year 
ended December 31, 2013.

(g) Summary of quantitative impact

The below tables includes a summary of the adjustments made to the Group’s statements of fi nancial position at December 31, 2012, its statements of profi t or 
loss and cash fl ows for the year period ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the implementation of the equity method instead of proportionate consolidation, 
as required by IFRS 11.

80

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 3

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

(1) Effect on the statement of fi nancial position 

Assets 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Restricted bank deposits 
Available for sale fi nancial assets 
Trade receivables 
Other receivables 
Prepayments and advances  
Trading properties 

Total current assets 

Equity accounted investees  
Loans to equity accounted investee 
Property and equipment 
Investment property 
Restricted bank deposits 
Other non-current assets 

Total non-current assets 

Total assets 

Liabilities 
Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Trade payables 
Related parties 
Provisions 
Derivatives 
Other liabilities 

Total current liabilities 

Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Other liabilities 
Deferred tax liabilities 

Total non-current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Non-controlling interests 

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

Total equity 

Total liabilities and equity 

December 31, 2012 
As presented 
in the past 
€’000 

December 31, 2012 
Effect of retrospective 
application of IFRS 11 
€’000 

December 31, 2012
As presented in these 
fi nancial statements
€’000

64,440 
25,518 
11,714 
4,687 
38,928 
7,821 
780,963 

934,071 

- 
- 
8,109 
14,489 
978 
358 

23,934 

958,005 

264,296 
34,966 
34,184 
8,748 
511 
15,597 
3,320 
14,094 

375,716 

5,773 
81,181 
39,010 
232 
6,947 

133,143 

508,859 

6,930 

442,216 

449,146 

958,005 

(29,066) 
(6,759) 

-   

(1,288) 
(27,436) 
- 
(168,488) 

(233,037) 

154,830 
6,949 
(728) 
- 
(199) 
(2) 

160,850 

(72,187) 

(58,319) 
- 
- 
(1,179) 

35   
- 
- 
(6,446) 

(65,909) 

- 
- 
- 
(47) 
(17) 

(64) 

(65,973) 

(6,214) 

- 

(6,214) 

(72,187) 

35,374
18,759
11,714
3,399
11,492
7,821
612,475

701,034

154,830
6,949
7,381
14,489
779
356

184,784

885,818

205,977
34,966
34,184
7,569
546
15,597
3,320
7,648

309,807

5,773
81,181
39,010
185
6,930

133,079

442,886

716

442,216

442,932

885,818

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

81

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

January 1, 2012 
As presented 
in the past 
€’000 

January 1, 2012 
Effect of retrospective 
application of IFRS 11 
€’000 

January 1, 2012
As presented in these 
fi nancial statements
€’000 

58,261 
21,428 
3,102 
25,568 
5,432 
12,941 
33,089 
850,229 

1,010,050 

- 
- 
- 
51,646 
9,026 
272,348 
5,456 

338,476 

(6,823) 
(3,988) 
- 
-   

(2,640) 
(4,220) 
(25,046) 
(201,555) 

(244,272) 

95,475 
141,174 
15,160 
(1,069) 
(796) 
(258,696) 
(235) 

(8,957) 

51,438
17,440
3,102
25,568
2,792
8,721
8,043
648,674

765,778

95,475
141,174
15,160
50,577
8,230
13,652
5,221

329,489

1,348,526 

(253,259) 

1,095,267

296,235 
32,930 
22,831 
27,329 
2,228 
15,597 
27,464 

424,614 

152,387 
110,320 
86,052 
3,561 
5,757 
15,673 

373,750 

798,364 

8,040 

542,122 

550,162 

(87,377) 
- 
- 
(1,617) 

-   
- 
(12,203) 

(101,197) 

(136,691) 
- 
- 

(5,598) 
(2,484) 

(144,773) 

(245,970) 

(7,289) 

- 

(7,289) 

208,858
32,930
22,831
25,712
2,228
15,597
15,261

323,417

15,696
110,320
86,052
3,561
159
13,189

228,977

552,394

751

542,122

542,873

1,348,526 

(253,259) 

1,095,267

Assets 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Restricted bank deposits 
Short-term deposits 
Available for sale fi nancial assets 
Trade receivables 
Other receivables 
Prepayments and advances  
Trading properties 

Total current assets 

Equity accounted investee - discontinued operation 
Equity accounted investees  
Loans to equity accounted investee 
Long-term deposits and other investments 
Property and equipment 
Investment property 
Other non-current assets 

Total non-current assets 

Total assets 

Liabilities 
Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Trade payables 
Related parties 
Provisions 
Other liabilities 

Total current liabilities 

Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Derivatives 
Other liabilities 
Deferred tax liabilities 

Total non-current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Non-controlling interests 

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

Total equity 

Total liabilities and equity 

82

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 3

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

(2) Effect on the income statement

For the year ended 
December 31, 2012 
As presented 
in the past 
€’000 

For the year ended 
December 31, 2012 
Effect of retrospective 
application of IFRS 11 
€’0000 

For the year ended 
December 31, 2012 
Other reclassifi cations 
(Refer to notes 27, 28, 29) 
€’000 

For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented in these 
fi nancial statements
€’000 

Continuing operations 
Rental income 
Revenue from entertainment centers 

Total revenues 

Write-down of Trading Properties 
Cost of operations 
Cost of operations-entertainment centers 

Gross profi t (loss) 

Write-down of Trading Properties 
Loss from disposal of undeveloped Trading Property 
Write-down of equity-accounted investees 
Share in results of equity-accounted investees 
Administrative expenses 
Other income 
Other expenses 

Results from operating activities 

Finance income 
Finance costs 

Net fi nance costs 

41,593 
- 

41,593 

(78,833) 
(20,385) 
- 

(57,625) 

- 
- 
- 
- 
(16,848) 
2,763 
(1,122) 

(72,832) 

20,515 
(37,055) 

(16,540) 

Share in results of equity-accounted investees 

(68) 

Loss before income tax 
Tax benefi t 

Loss from continuing operations 

Discontinued operation 
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax 

Loss for the period 

Loss attributable to:  
Owners of the Company (1) 
Non-controlling interests 
Earnings per share 
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO) 
Earnings per share – continuing operations 
Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO) 

(89,440) 
5,463 

(83,977) 

(1,950) 

(85,927) 

(86,163) 
236 

(0.29) 

(0.28) 

(11,570) 
- 

(11,570) 

26,151 
6,205 
- 

20,786 

- 
- 
(23,443) 
- 
1,945 
(1,469) 
- 

(2,181) 

(157) 
(476) 

(633) 

1,543 

(1,271) 
1,129 

(142) 

(94) 

(236) 

- 
(236) 

- 

- 

(6,911) 
6,911 

- 

52,682 
4,796 
(8,267) 

49,211 

(60,293) 
(65) 
- 
1,475 
3,471 
7,676 
- 

1,475 

- 
- 

- 

(1,475) 

- 
- 

- 

- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 

23,112
6,911

30,023

-
(9,384)
(8,267)

12,372

(60,293)
(65)
(23,443)
1,475
(11,432)
8,970
(1,122)

(73,538)

20,358
(37,531)

(17,173)

-

(90,711)
6,592

(84,119)

(2,044)

(86,163)

(86,163)
-

(0.29)

(0.28)

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

83

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

(3) Effect on the statement of cash fl ows

Net cash used in operating activities 

Net cash from investing activities 

Net cash used in fi nancing activities 

Effect of exchange rate fl uctuations on cash and cash equivalents 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the period 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 

For the year ended 
December 31, 2012 
As presented 
in the past 
€’000 

For the year ended 
December 31, 2012 
Effect of retrospective 
application of IFRS 11 
€’000 

For the year ended
December 31, 2012
As presented in these 
fi nancial statements
€’000 

(54,581) 

194,476 

(133,758) 

42 
6,179 
58,261 

64,440 

(13,207) 

(61,853) 

52,915 

(98) 
(22,243) 
(6,823) 

(29,066) 

(67,788)

132,623

(80,843)

(56)
(16,064)
51,438

35,374

NOTE 4 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Except for the changes explained in note 3, the Group has consistently applied the following accounting policies to all periods presented in these consolidated 
fi nancial statements.

Certain comparative amounts in the consolidated statement of fi nancial position, consolidated statement of profi t or loss, consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income and consolidated statement of cash fl ow have been reclassifi ed to conform to the current year’s presentation, mainly due to 
implementation of IFRS 11 (refer to notes 14, 27, 28). 

a. Basis of consolidation

1. Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with 
the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The fi nancial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated 
fi nancial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases. 

Where necessary, adjustments are made to the fi nancial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used into line with those used by the Group in 
the consolidated fi nancial statements.

2. Interests in equity-accounted investees

The Group’s interests in equity-accounted investees comprise interests in associates and a joint venture. Associates are those entities in which the Group has 
signifi cant infl uence, but not control or joint control, over the fi nancial and operating policies. A joint venture is an arrangement in which the Group has joint 
control, whereby the Group has rights to the net assets of the arrangement, rather than rights to its assets and obligations for its liabilities.

Interests in associates and the joint venture are accounted for using the equity method. They are recognised initially at cost, which includes transaction costs. 
Subsequent to initial recognition, the consolidated fi nancial statements include the Group’s share of the profi t or loss and other comprehensive income of equity-
accounted investees, until the date on which signifi cant infl uence or joint control ceases. 

3. Non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests are measured at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifi able net assets at the acquisition date. Changes in the Group’s interest 
in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.

4. Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised gains arising 
from transactions with equity-accounted investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are 
eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

84

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 3 / note 4

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

b. Foreign currency

1. Foreign currency transactions

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group companies at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. 
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-
monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair 
value was determined. Foreign currency differences are generally recognised in profi t or loss. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a 
foreign currency are not translated. 

However, foreign currency differences arising from the translation of available-for-sale equity investments (except on impairment in which case foreign currency 
differences that have been recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassifi ed to profi t or loss) are recognised in other comprehensive income. 

2. Foreign operations

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated into euro at the exchange rates 
at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into euro at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.   
Foreign currency differences are recognised in other comprehensive income, and accumulated in the translation reserve, except to the extent that the translation 
difference is allocated to non-controlling interest.

When a foreign operation is disposed of in its entirety or partially such that control, signifi cant infl uence or joint control is lost, the cumulative amount in the 
translation reserve related to that foreign operation is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal. If the Group disposes of part of its 
interest in a subsidiary but retains control, then the relevant proportion of the cumulative amount is reattributed to non-controlling interest. 

When the Group disposes of only part of an associate or joint venture while retaining signifi cant infl uence or joint control, the relevant proportion of the 
cumulative amount is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss.

If the settlement of a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future, then foreign 
currency differences arising from such item form part of the net investment in the foreign operation. Accordingly, such differences are recognised in other 
comprehensive income and accumulated in the translation reserve.

c. Financial instruments

(1) Non-derivative fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities – recognition and de-recognition

The Group initially recognises loans and receivables and debt securities issued on the date when they are originated. All other fi nancial assets and fi nancial 
liabilities are initially recognised on the trade date.  

The Group derecognises a fi nancial asset when the contractual rights to the cash fl ows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual 
cash fl ows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the fi nancial asset are transferred, or it neither transfers nor retains 
substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognised fi nancial assets 
that is created or retained by the Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.

The Group derecognises a fi nancial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled, or expire.

Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of fi nancial position when, and only when, the Group has a legal 
right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Refer to note 32 for the list 
of Non-derivative fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities.

(2) Non-derivative fi nancial assets – measurement

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted bank deposits

In the consolidated statement of cash fl ows, cash and cash equivalents includes bank deposits deposited for periods which do not exceed three months. 
Restricted bank deposits are deposit restricted due to bank facilities.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

85

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Loans and receivables

These assets are initially recognised at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortised 
cost using the effective interest method.  The collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectable are written 
off in the period in which they are identifi ed. Doubtful receivables are impaired when there is objective evidence that the Group will not collect all amounts due. 
These types of assets are discussed in note 9, 10a  and 10b.

Held for trading fi nancial assets

These assets are initially recognised at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value 
and changes therein, are recognised in statement of profi t or loss. 

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets

These assets are initially recognised at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment 
losses and foreign currency differences on debt instruments (refer to 3(h) below), are recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity. 
When these assets are derecognised, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss.

(3) Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities

Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss

Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss include selected unsecured non-convertible Debentures series A and series B (refer to note 20). 

Upon initial recognition a fi nancial liability may be designated by the Company at fair value through profi t or loss. Financial instruments are designated at fair value 
through profi t or loss if the Group manages such instruments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Group’s 
documented risk management or investment strategy, or to eliminate or signifi cantly reduce a measurement or recognition inconsistency. Upon initial recognition 
attributable transaction costs are recognised in profi t or loss when incurred. Financial liabilities at fair value through profi t or loss are measured at fair value, and 
changes therein are recognised in profi t or loss.

Other non-derivative fi nancial liabilities

Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these 
liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The Group has the following non-derivative fi nancial liabilities: interest bearing loans, 
debentures not designated as fair value through profi t or loss (refer to note 21), trade payables, related parties and other liabilities.

(4)  Derivative fi nancial instruments 

The Group holds (or held) derivative fi nancial instruments to hedge its foreign currency and interest rate risk exposures. Embedded derivatives are separated from 
the host contract and accounted for separately if certain criteria are met. Derivatives are recognised initially at fair value; any directly attributable transaction costs 
are recognised in profi t or loss as they are incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are generally 
recognised in profi t or loss.

d. Share capital

Ordinary shares are classifi ed as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from 
equity, net of any tax effect. Costs attributable to listing existing shares are expensed as incurred.

e. Trading properties 

Properties that are being constructed or developed for sale in the ordinary course of business and empty plots acquired to be developed for such a sale are 
classifi ed as trading properties (inventory) and measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  

Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs to complete construction and selling expenses. If net 
realisable value is less than the cost, the trading property is written down to net realisable value. 

In each subsequent period, a new assessment is made of net realisable value. When the circumstances that previously caused trading properties to be written 
down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase in net realisable value because of changed economic circumstances, the amount of 
the write-down is reversed so that the new carrying amount is the lower of the cost and the revised net realisable value. 

86

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 4

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

The amount of any write-down of trading properties to net realisable value and all losses of trading properties are recognised as a Write-down of trading 
properties expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any reversal of such write downs arising from an increase in net realisable value is 
recognised as a reduction in the expense in the period in which the reversal occurs. 

Lands which are designated for development of trading properties projects are not written down below costs if the completed projects are expected to be sold at 
or above cost.

Costs comprise all costs of purchase, direct materials, direct labour costs, subcontracting costs and other direct overhead costs incurred in bringing the 
properties to their present condition.  

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset are capitalized as part of the costs of the asset. A qualifying asset is an 
asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale. Other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period 
in which they incurred. 

Capitalization of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in progress and expenditure and borrowing costs are being incurred. 
Capitalization of borrowing costs may continue until the asset is substantially ready for its intended use (i.e. upon issuance of certifi cate of occupancy).

In certain cases, where the construction phase is suspended for an unplanned period expected to exceed 25% of the total scheduled time for construction, 
cessation of the capitalisation of borrowing cost will apply, until construction phase is resumed.

Non–specifi c borrowing costs are capitalised to such qualifying asset, by applying a capitalization rate to the expenditures on such asset. The capitalization rate 
is the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the borrowings of the Group that are outstanding during the period, other than borrowing made 
specifi cally for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. 

The amount of borrowing costs capitalized during the period does not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during that period.

f. Investment property 

Investment property is initially measured at cost and subsequently at fair value with any change therein recognised in profi t or loss. Any gain or loss on disposal 
of investment property (calculated as the difference between the net proceeds from disposal and the carrying amount of the item) is recognised in profi t or loss. 

g. Property and equipment

Items of property and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses (refer to accounting policy 3(h)).If 
signifi cant parts of an item of property and equipment have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, 
plant and equipment.

Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property and equipment is recognised in profi t or loss. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of 
property and equipment less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognised in profi t or 
loss. Land is not depreciated. 

The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:

Land – owned 

Offi ce buildings 

Equipment, fi xture and fi ttings 

Aircrafts 

Other* 

Years

0

25-50

10-15

20

3-18

* Consists mainly of motor vehicles, equipment, computers, peripheral equipment, etc.

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

87

 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

h. Impairment

(1) Non-derivative fi nancial assets

Financial assets not classifi ed as at fair value through profi t or loss are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence of 
impairment.

Objective evidence that fi nancial assets are impaired includes:

restructuring of an amount due to the Group on terms that the Group would not consider otherwise;
indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy;

•  default or delinquency by a debtor;
• 
• 
•  adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers or issuers;
• 
•  observable data indicating that there is measurable decrease in expected cash fl ows from a group of fi nancial assets

the disappearance of an active market for a security; or

Financial assets measured at amortised cost

The Group considers evidence of impairment for these assets at both an individual asset and a collective level. All individually signifi cant assets are individually 
assessed for impairment. Those found not to be impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet individually 
identifi ed. Assets that are not individually signifi cant are collectively assessed for impairment. Collective assessment is carried out by grouping together assets 
with similar risk characteristics.  

In assessing collective impairment, the Group uses historical information on the timing of recoveries and the amount of loss incurred, and makes an adjustment if 
current economic and credit conditions are such that the actual losses are likely to be greater or lesser than suggested by historical trends. 

An impairment loss is calculated as the difference between an asset’s carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash fl ows discounted at the 
asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognised in profi t or loss and refl ected in an allowance account. When the Group considers that there are no 
realistic prospects of recovery of the asset, the relevant amounts are written off. 

If the amount of impairment loss subsequently decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, 
then the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed through profi t or loss.

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets

Impairment losses on available-for-sale fi nancial assets are recognised by reclassifying the losses accumulated in the fair value reserve to profi t or loss. The 
amount reclassifi ed is the difference between the acquisition cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and the current fair value, less any impairment 
loss previously recognised in profi t or loss. If the fair value of an impaired available-for-sale debt security subsequently increases and the increase can be related 
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised, then the impairment loss is reversed through profi t or loss. Subsequent recovery in 
the fair value of available for sale equity instruments are reversed through other comprehensive income.

(2)  Non-fi nancial assets and interests in equity accounted investees

At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its non-fi nancial assets (property and equipment) and interests in equity accounted investees to 
determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. 

For impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash infl ows from continuing use that are largely independent 
of the cash infl ows of other assets or cash generating units (“CGU”). 

The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. Value in use is based on the estimated future cash 
fl ows, discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to 
the asset or CGU.  An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount.

Impairment losses are recognised in profi t or loss. They are allocated fi rst to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU, and then to reduce 
the carrying amounts of the other assets in the CGU on a pro rata basis.

88

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 4

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is never reversed. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount 
does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

i. Provisions

Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and 
the risks specifi c to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as fi nance cost.

Construction costs 

Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outfl ow of 
resources embodying economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. 

Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is 
virtually certain. 

The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected 
future cash fl ows at a pre-tax rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to the liability. The unwinding of the 
discount is recognised as fi nance cost.

Warranties

A provision for warranties is recognised when the underlying products or services are sold, based on historical warranty data and a weighting of possible 
outcomes against their associated probabilities.

Restructuring plan

A provision for restructuring is recognised when a formal restructuring plan was approved by all relevant bodies, and the restructuring either has commenced or 
has been announced publicly. Future operating losses are not provided for.

j. Revenue 

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances, rebates and 
amounts collected on behalf of third parties.

The Group recognises revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefi ts will fl ow to the entity and 
specifi c criteria have been met for each of the Group’s activities as described below.  The Group bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration 
the type of customer, the type of transaction and specifi cs of each arrangement.

Rental income

The Group leases real estate to its customers under leases that are classifi ed as operating leases. Rental income from investment property and trading property 
is recognized in profi t or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease origination fees and internal direct lease origination costs are deferred and 
amortized over the related lease term. Lease incentives granted are recognized as an integral part of the total rental income, over the term of the lease.

The leases generally provide for rent escalations throughout the lease term. For these leases, the revenue is recognized on a straight line basis so as to produce a 
constant periodic rent over the term of the lease.  The leases may also provide for contingent rent based on a percentage of the lessee’s gross sales or contingent 
rent indexed to further increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

Where rentals that are contingent upon reaching a certain percentage of the lessee’s gross sales, the Group recognizes rental revenue when the factor on which 
the contingent lease payment is based actually occurs. Rental revenues for lease escalations indexed to future increases in the CPI are recognized only after the 
changes in the index have occurred.

Revenues from selling of trading properties and investment properties

Revenues from selling of trading properties and investment properties are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenues are 
recognized when all the following conditions are met:

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

89

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

a.  the Group has transferred to the buyer the signifi cant risks and rewards of ownership;
b.  the Group retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the property sold; 
c.  the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
d.  it is probable that the economic benefi ts associated with the transaction will fl ow to the Group (including the fact that the buyer’s initial and continuing 

investment is adequate to demonstrate commitment to pay);
the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably; and
there are no remaining signifi cant performance obligations.

e 
f. 

Determining whether these criteria have been met for each sale transaction, requires certain degree of judgment by the Group management.  The judgment is 
made in determination whether, at the end of the reporting period, the Group has transferred to the buyer the signifi cant risks and rewards associated with the real 
estate assets sold. 

Such determination is based on an analysis of the terms included in the sale agreement executed with the buyer as well as an analysis of other commercial 
understandings with the buyer in respect of the real estate sold. In certain cases, the sale agreement with the buyer is signed during the construction period and 
the consummation of the transaction is subject to certain conditions precedents which have to be fulfi lled prior to delivery.   Revenues are, therefore, recognized 
when all the signifi cant conditions precedent included in the agreement have been fulfi lled by the Group and/or waived by the buyer prior to the end of the 
reporting period.

Generally, the Group is provided with a bank guarantee from the buyer for the total estimated proceeds in order to secure the payment by the buyer at delivery. 
Therefore, the Group is not exposed to any signifi cant risks in respect of payment of the proceeds by the buyer.

k. Operating lease payments

Payments made under operating leases (in respect of plots of land under usufruct) are recognized in profi t or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the 
lease but are capitalized in relation to land used for the development of trading properties during the construction period (similar to borrowing costs).

l. Finance income and cost

For the composition of fi nance income and cost refer to note 30. For capitalisation of borrowing costs please refer to note 11.

Interest income and expense which are not capitalized are recognized in the income statement as they accrue, using the effective interest method. For the Group’s 
policy regarding capitalization of borrowing costs refer to note 3(e).

m. Income tax 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognised in profi t or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items 
recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

Current tax 

Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to tax payable or receivable in respect 
of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any tax arising from dividends.

Deferred tax 

Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for fi nancial reporting purposes and the 
amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for:

• 

• 

• 

temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor 
taxable profi t or loss;
temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries and joint arrangements to the extent that the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of 
the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and
taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill

Deferred tax assets are recognised for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future 
taxable profi ts will be available against which they can be used. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no 
longer probable that the related tax benefi t will be realised.

90

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 4

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if:

• 
• 

there is  a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities; and
the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either: 
1)  the same taxable entity; or
2)  different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities 

simultaneously, in each future period in which signifi cant amounts of deferred tax liabilities or assets are expected to be settled or recovered.

n. Segment reporting

Segment results that are reported to the Group’s CEO (the chief operating decision maker) include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can 
be allocated on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise mainly corporate debt, assets (primarily the Company’s headquarters), head offi ce expenses, and 
tax assets and liabilities. 

o. Employee benefi ts

1. Bonuses

The Group recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses, which are based on agreements with employees or according to management decisions based on 
Group performance goals and on individual employee performance. The Group recognizes a liability where contractually obliged or where past practice has created 
a constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

2. Share-based payment transactions 

The fair value of options granted to employees to acquire shares of the Company is recognized as an employee expense or capitalized if directly associated with 
development of trading property, with a corresponding increase in equity.  The fair value is measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the 
employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to refl ect the actual number of share options that vest.

Where the terms of an equity-settled award are modifi ed, the minimum expense recognized is the expense as if the terms had not been modifi ed. An additional 
expense is recognized for any modifi cation, which increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise benefi cial to the 
employees as measured at the date of modifi cation. The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of share-based payments, which may be settled 
in cash, at the option of the holder, is recognized as an expense, with a corresponding increase in liability, over the period in which the employees become 
unconditionally entitled to payment. The fair value is re-measured at each reporting date and at settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are 
recognized as an additional cost in salaries and related expenses in the income statement. As of the end of the reporting period share-based payments which may 
be settled in cash are options granted to only one person and can be cash settled at the option of the holder.

p. Earnings Per Share

The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profi t or loss attributable to 
ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting 
the profi t or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential 
ordinary shares, which comprise share options granted to employees. 

q. Discontinued operation

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group’s business, the operations and cash fl ows of which can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Group, 
that either has been disposed of or is classifi ed as held for sale and: 

1.  represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; 
2.  is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; or 
3.  is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to re-sale. 

Classifi cation as a discontinued operation occurs on disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classifi ed as held-for-sale, if earlier.   When an 
operation is classifi ed as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of profi t or loss and statement of comprehensive income are re-presented as if the 
operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

91

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

r. New standards not yet adopted 

Several new standards and amendments to standards are not yet effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, and has not been applied in preparing these 
consolidated fi nancial statements.

•  Amendments to IAS 32 – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to be applied 

retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted, however the additional disclosures required by Amendments to IFRS 7 Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets 
and Financial Liabilities must also be made) do not introduce new rules for offsetting fi nancial assets and liabilities; rather they clarify the offsetting criteria to 
address inconsistencies in their application.

The Amendments clarify that an entity currently has a legally enforceable right to set-off if that right is:

1.  not contingent on a future event; and 
2.  enforceable both in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the entity and all counterparties.

The Group does not expect the Amendments to have any impact on the fi nancial statements since it does not apply offsetting to any of its
fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities and it has not entered into master netting arrangements.

•  Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 –  Investment Entities; (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; early adoption is 
permitted; to be applied retrospectively subject to transitional provisions) provide an exception to the consolidation requirements in IFRS 10 and requires 
qualifying investment entities to measure their investments in controlled entities – as well as investments in associates and joint ventures – at fair value 
through profi t or loss, rather than consolidating them.

The consolidation exemption is mandatory (i.e. not optional), with the only exception being that subsidiaries that are considered as an extension of the 
investment entity’s investing activities, must still be consolidated. 

An entity qualifi es as an investment entity if it meets all of the essential elements of the defi nition of an investment entity. According to these essential elements 
an investment entity:

1.  obtains funds from investors to provide those investors with investment management services;
2.  commits to its investors that its business purpose is to invest for returns solely from appreciation and/or investment income; and 
3.  Measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.

The amendments also set out disclosure requirements for investment entities. 

The Group does not expect the new standard to have any impact on the fi nancial statements, since the Parent Company does not qualify as an investment 
entity.

•  Amendments to IAS 36 – Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to be 
applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted, however an entity shall not apply the amendments in periods (including comparative periods) in which 
it does not also apply IFRS 13). 
The Amendments clarify that recoverable amount should be disclosed only for individual assets (including goodwill) or cash-generated units for which an 
impairment loss was recognised or reversed during the period.

The Amendments also require the following additional disclosures when impairment for individual assets (including goodwill) or cash-generated units has 
been recognised or reversed in the period and recoverable amount is based on fair value less costs to disposal:

1.  the level of IFRS 13 ‘Fair value hierarchy’ within which the fair value measurement of the asset or cash-generating unit is categorised;
2.  for fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a description of the valuation techniques used and any 

changes in that valuation technique together with the reason for making it;

3.  for fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3, each key assumption (i.e. assumptions to which recoverable amount is most sensitive) 
used in determining fair value less costs of disposal. If fair value less costs of disposal is measured using a present value technique, discount rate(s) used 
both in current and previous measurement should be disclosed.

The Company does not expect the new Standard will have a material impact on the fi nancial statements.

92

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 4 / note 5

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

•  Amendments to IAS 39 – Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting (Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014; to 

be applied retrospectively. Earlier application is permitted: 

The Amendments allows hedge accounting to continue in a situation where a derivative, which has been designated as a hedging instrument, is novated to 
effect clearing with a central counterparty as a result of laws and regulations, when the following criteria are met:

1.  The novation is made as a consequence of laws or regulations
2.  A clearing counterparty becomes a new counterparty to each of the original counterparties of the derivative instrument
3.  Changes to the terms of the derivative are limited to those necessary to replace the counterparty

The Company does not expect the new standard to have any impact on the fi nancial statements, since the entity does not currently apply hedge accounting.

NOTE 5 - MEASUREMENT OF FAIR VALUES 

A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the measurement of fair value, for both fi nancial and non-fi nancial assets and liabilities.  

When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Group uses market observable data as far as possible. The Company’s fi nance department reviews 
signifi cant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments. If third party information, such as broker quotes, is used to measure fair values, then the fi nance 
department assesses the evidence obtained from the third parties to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS, including the 
level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuations should be classifi ed.  Fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the 
inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows: 

•  Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•  Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived 

from prices)

•  Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs)
•  Note 8 – Available for sale fi nancial assets
•  Note 15 – Derivatives  
•  Note 20 – Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss  
•  Note 25 – Employee share option plan
•  Note 32 – Financial instruments

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

93

 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 6 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Bank deposits and cash denominated in 

December 31, 2013 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

Interest rate as of 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

EUR 

United States Dollar (USD) 

Polish Złotys (PLN) 

Indian Rupee (INR) 

New Israeli Shekel (NIS) 

Other currencies 

Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of fi nancial position 

See (1) below 

See (1) below 

Overnight Wibor*0.7 

Mainly 0% 

13,894 

3,250 

3,393 

1,541 

3,375 

704 

26,157 

20,982

5,967

3,469

1,704

2,272

980

35,374

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  Main EUR and USD deposits as of December 31, 2013 are held on corporate level and bear money market interest rates which are mainly between 0% and 0.5%.

The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for fi nancial assets and liabilities are disclosed in note 32. 

NOTE 7 - RESTRICTED BANK DEPOSITS

Short-term restricted bank deposits

In EUR 

In USD 

In NIS 

In other currencies 

Total short-term 

Interest rate as of 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2013 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

See (1) below 

See (2) below 

See (2) below 

5,579 

- 

- 

740 

6,319 

8,337

6,946

2,426

1,050

18,759

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  As of December 31, 2013, EUR 5.6 million is restricted mainly in respect of bank facilities agreements signed to fi nance Projects in Poland, Serbia, and the Czech Republic. These 

amounts carry an annual interest rate of mainly Overnight rates.  

2  Restriction over 2012 USD balance was removed following the insurance refund in June 2013 (refer also to note 34(J)). Restriction over 2012 NIS balance was removed following the 

repayment of NIS denominated loan

The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for fi nancial assets and liabilities are disclosed in note 32. 

94

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 6 / note 7 / note 8 / note 9 / note 10

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 8 - AVAILABLE FOR SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets (“AFS”) portfolio consisted of mainly traded debt securities issued by banks and corporates.

Interest income from AFS 
Gain (loss) from selling AFS 

Total for the year 

Balance as at January1 
Purchase of AFS* 
Sale/redemption of AFS 
Discount amortization 
Changes in market value of AFS 

Balance as at December 31 

For the year ended 
December 31, 2013 
€’000 

For the year ended
December 31, 2012
€’000

233 
723 

956 

11,714 
155 
(12,012) 
157 
(14) 

- 

712
(1,222)

(510) 

25,568
16,089
(31,294)
54
1,297

11,714

* An additional EUR 1.27 million of debt securities bonds were purchased and recorded as held for trading fi nancial assets adjusted to fair value at year end.

The fair value of available-for-sale fi nancial assets was determined by reference to their quoted closing bid price at the reporting date.

NOTE 9 - TRADE RECEIVABLES 

Trade receivables  
Less - Allowance for doubtful debts 

Total 

December 31, 2013 
€’000 

December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

4,887 
(1,515) 

3,372 

4,727
(1,328)

3,399

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

NOTE 10 - OTHER RECEIVABLES, PREPAYMENTS AND ADVANCES

a. Other receivables

Insurance company receivable (refer to note 34(J)) 
Receivable in respect of disposal of equity-accounted investee Új Udvar (refer to note 14,34(F)) 
VAT and tax receivables 
Related parties 
Others 

Total 

*   Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

December 31, 2013 
€’000 

December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

- 
2,350 
1,877 
- 
644 

4,871 

7,611
-
2,218
936
727

11,492

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

95

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

b. Prepayments and advances

Prepayment in respect of plot purchase1 
Prepaid expenses 

Advances to suppliers  

Total 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

 Restated* €’000

- 
617 
776 

1,393 

5,157

1,294

1,370

7,821

*   Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  The 2012 amount represents two components, with both amounts impaired in the course of 2013:

A) Prepayment in respect of the Kochi project in India in the amount of EUR 4.3 million. 

  On 11 November 2013 the Company has demanded and exercised the corporate guarantee in the amount of EUR 4.3 million including the interest thereon up till such date (the 

“Reimbursement Payment”) provided by EI in the frame of the Indian JV Agreement on the ground of EI’s default to fi nalize and conclude the transfer of the Kochi Project Rights to the 

Indian JV Vehicle. 

  EI in its reply letter has refused to repay the Reimbursement Payment.  The Company is in the view that, based on the mentioned JV Agreement and its ancillary documents (including 

the mentioned corporate guarantee issued by EI in favour of the Company), it has valid claim to get back the mentioned amount of EUR 4.3 million.  

  Despite the above, and in view of uncertainties regarding amounts and/or time, the Company decided to record the prepayment.

B) Prepayment in respect of the Târgu Mures¸ project in the amount of circa EUR 1 million.  The Company decided to record this prepayment in view of uncertainty associated with the 

development of the project.

NOTE 11 - TRADING PROPERTIES 

Balance as at 1 January 

Acquisition and construction costs 
Capitalized borrowing costs1 
Write-down of trading properties2 
Effect of movements in exchange rates 

Trading properties disposed (refer to note 34(E)) 

Balance as at 31 December3 

Completed trading properties (operating shopping centers) 
Plots scheduled for construction3, 4 
Plots under planning stage  

Total 

December 31, 2013** 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

 Restated* €’000

612,475 
3,728 
6,530 
(117,913) 
(7,831) 
(1,815) 

495,174 

222,976 
206,236 
65,962 

495,174 

648,674

21,254

19,091
(60,293)

(2,800)

(13,451)

612,475

252,178

254,110

106,187

612,475

*   Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

** As of December 31, 2013, the Koregaon Park trading property is the only trading property presented as short-term, owing to the existence of a sale and purchase agreement on the 

trading property.  All other trading properties are classifi ed as long-term.

1  Regarding accounting policy of capitalizing borrowing costs refer to note 4 (e). The Company temporarily suspended capitalization of borrowing costs starting July 1, 2013, following 

temporary suspension of active development of the majority of its trading properties due to the Group’s liquidity crisis.

96

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 10 / note 11

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

2  Breakdown of write-down of trading properties:

  Project name (location) 

Ias¸i (Ias¸i, Romania) 

  Koregaon Park Plaza (Pune, India) 

  Belgrade Plaza / MUP (Belgrade, Serbia) 

  Pireas Plaza (Athens, Greece) 

  Liberec Plaza (Liberec, Czech Republic) 

  Belgrade Plaza / Visnjicka (Belgrade, Serbia) 

  Łódz´  Plaza (Łódz´ , Poland) 

  Casa Radio - Turbines (Bucharest, Romania) 
  Zgorzelec Plaza (Zgorzelec, Poland) 

  Constant¸a (Constant¸a, Romania) 

  Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc, Romania) 

  Kragujevac Plaza (Kragujevac, Serbia) 

  Timis¸oara Plaza (Timis¸oara, Romania) 

  Roztoky (Prague, Czech Republic) 

  Kielce Plaza (Kielce, Poland)  

  Sofi a (Sofi a, Bulgaria)  

  Other, aggregated 

  Total 

The year ended 

December 31, 2013 

The year ended

December 31, 2012

€’000 

1,582 
15,564 
29,347 
12,267 
11,578 
6,825 
6,400 
6,305 
2,013 
4,972 
4,414 
751 
3,968 
3,500 
828 
- 
7,599 

’€’000

19,881

14,523

5,014

-

3,141

-

-

1,912
4,136

-

-

4,125

-

-

2,698

1,685

3,178

117,913 

60,293 

The write downs were caused mainly by the following factors:

•  There were signifi cant decreases in Net Realizable Values of certain projects below the carrying amount due to worsening market condition in the certain countries in which the Group 

operates including mainly Romania and Serbia.

• 

In accordance with the Group’s accounting policy plots of lands held for development are not written down below costs if the completed projects are expected to be sold at or above cost.

Following management reassessment of the business plans of certain undeveloped plots of land, and the diffi culty to assess whether they will be developed or not, and to recover their 

costs, the carrying amount of the plots were written down to their Net Realizable Values. 

•  The disposal, or contracted disposal, of certain properties at a selling price below their carrying amount triggered write down of these properties to their contractual selling price (refer to 

note 34(E) and 34(G))

3  Including cost of Casa Radio project in Romania in a total amount of EUR 153 million (2012 – EUR 158 million).  

4  The value of the Casa Radio project in Romania includes two non-operative gas turbines with a total carrying amount of EUR 3 million (following write down). These turbines were 

purchased in the past with the purpose of supplying energy to the completed project due to lack of suffi cient energy infrastructure capabilities in Bucharest at the time. Following an 

improvement in the energy infrastructure in recent years the turbines became redundant and efforts were made to dispose of them. In the course of 2013 the turbines were written down 

(EUR 6.3 million) to their Net Realizable Values based on most recent offering prices received from potential buyers. Refer to note 38 (B) for the selling of the turbines.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

97

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Casa Radio note

1. General

In 2006 the Company entered into an agreement according to which it acquired 75% interest in a company (“Project SPV”) which under a Public-Private Partnership 
agreement (“PPP”) with the Government of Romania is to develop the Casa Radio site in central Bucharest (“Project”). After signing the PPP agreement, the 
Company holds indirectly 75% of the shares in the Project SPV, the remaining 25% are held by the Romanian authorities (15%) and another third party (10%).  

As part of the PPP, the Project SPV was granted with development and exploitation rights in relation to the site for a period of 49 years, starting December 2006. 
In addition, the Project SPV has committed to construct a Public Authority Building (“PAB”) measuring approximately 11.000 square meters for the Romanian 
Government at its own cost.

Large scale demolition, design and foundation works were performed on the construction site which amounted to circa EUR 85 million until 2010, when current 
construction and development were put on hold due to lack of progress in the renegotiation of the PPP Contract with the Authorities (refer to point 3 below).

2. Obtaining of the Detailed Urban Plan (“PUD”) permit

The Project SPV obtained the PUD related to this project in September 2012. Furthermore, on 13 December 2012, the Court took note of the waiver of the claim 
submitted by certain plaintiffs and rejected the litigation aiming to cancel the approval of the Zonal Urban Plan (“PUZ”) related to the Project. The court decision is 
irrevocable. 

As the PUD is based on the PUZ, the risk that the PUD would be cancelled as a result of the cancellation of the PUZ was removed following the date when the PUZ 
was cleared in court on December 13, 2012. 

3. Discussions with Authorities on construction time table deferral

As a result of point 2, following the Court decision, the Project SPV was required to submit a request for building permits within 60 days from the approval date of 
the PUZ/PUD and commence development of its project within 60 days after obtaining the building permit. 

However, due to substantial differences between the approved PUD and stipulations in the PPP Contract as well as changes in the EU directives concerning 
buildings used by Public Authorities, and in order to ensure a construction process that will be adjusted to current market conditions, the Project SPV started 
preliminary discussions with the Romanian Authorities (which are both shareholders of the Project SPV and a party to the PPP) regarding the future development 
of the project. 

The Project SPV also offi cially notifi ed the Romanian Authorities in order to renegotiate the existing PPP contract on items such as time table, structure and mile
stones (e.g the construction of the Public Authority Building (“PAB”), whose’ estimated costs are provisioned for in these fi nancial statement – refer to point 4 below). 

The Company estimates that although there is no formal obligation from the Romanian Authorities to renegotiate the PPP agreement, such obligation is expressly 
provided for the situation when extraordinary economic circumstances arise. Management believes that an agreement will be reached with the Authorities 
regarding the future development of the project (management cannot assess at this stage the timing of reaching such agreement) and that the current discussions 
with the Authorities bear no material exposure for the Company’s fi nancial position as of 31 December 2013.

4. Provision in respect of PAB

As mentioned in point 1 above, when the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 75% interest in the Project SPV it assumed a commitment to construct 
the PAB at its own costs for the benefi t of the Romanian Government. Consequently, the Company had recorded a provision in the amount of EUR 17.1 million in 
respect of the construction of the PAB. The Company utilized the amount of EUR 1.5 million out of this provision, but in the last 3 years has made no change in the 
provision, in view of signifi cant changes that might be implemented to the project, mainly with the timing of the construction, and the construction specifi cations 
depending upon the outcome of the negotiations with the Authorities.  Management believes that the current level of provision is an appropriate estimation in the 
current circumstances.

Upon reaching concrete agreements with Authorities, the Company will be able to update the provision.

Security over trading properties

As of December 31, 2013, a total carrying amount of EUR 223 million (December 31, 2012 – EUR 252 million) which represent operating shopping centers is 
pledged against secured bank loans of approximately EUR 173 million.

98

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 11

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Write-down of trading properties

Trading properties are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Determining net realizable value is inherently subjective as it requires estimates of 
future events and takes into account special assumptions in the valuations, many of which are diffi cult to predict.   

Actual results could be signifi cantly different than the Company’s estimates and could have a material effect on the Company’s fi nancial results.  Trading Properties 
accumulated write-downs from cost as of December 31, 2013, amounted to EUR 222 million or 31% percent of gross trading properties balance (2012 – EUR 108 
million or 15% of gross trading property balance).

These valuations becomes increasingly diffi cult as it relates to estimates and assumptions for projects in the preliminary stage of development in addition to 
current economic uncertainty and the lack of transactions in the real estate market in the CEE and India for same or similar properties.

Management is responsible for determining the net realizable value of the Group’s Trading Properties. In determining net realizable value of the vast majority of 
Trading Properties, management utilizes the services of an independent third party recognized as a specialist in valuation of properties (as at December 31, 2013 
98% of the value of trading properties was based on valuations done by the independent third party valuation service (2012 - 99%).  The remaining properties 
were valued internally. 

On an annual basis, the Company reviews the valuation methodologies utilized by the independent third party valuator service for each property. The main features 
included in each valuation are:

1. Completed trading properties (operating shopping centers)

The Net Realizable Value of operating shopping centers refl ects rental income from current leases and assumptions about rental income from future leases in the 
light of current market conditions.

The Net Realizable Value also refl ects, on a similar basis, any cash outfl ows that could be expected in respect of the property. The Group uses professional 
appraisers for determining the Net Realizable Value of the operating shopping centers.

Independent valuation reports are prepared by Cushman & Wakefi eld by using discounted cash fl ow valuation techniques. The Group uses assumptions that are 
mainly based on market conditions existing at the reporting date. 

The principal assumptions underlying management’s estimation of Net Realizable Values are those related to the receipt of contractual rentals, expected future 
market rentals, void periods, maintenance requirements and appropriate discount rates. These valuations are regularly compared to actual market yield data and 
actual transactions made by the Group and those reported by the market, if available. Expected future rentals are determined on the basis of current market rentals 
for similar properties in the same location and condition.

2. Incomplete trading properties (undeveloped plots of lands)

The net realizable value in case of an undeveloped project is determined by either:

•  comparison with the sale price of land for comparable development; or 
•  assessment of the value of the project as completed and deduction of the costs of development (including developer’s profi t) to arrive at the underlying land 

value. This is known as the residual method.

2a – Comparative method

Valuation by comparison is essentially objective in that it is based on an analysis of the price achieved for sites with broadly similar development characteristics. 
Valuation by comparison is generally used if evidence of actual sales can be found and analyzed on a common unit basis, such as site area, developable area or 
habitable room. 

Where comparable development cannot be identifi ed in the immediate area of the subject site or when sales information is not clearly available through common 
channels of information (internet, newspapers, trade journals, periodic market research) it is necessary to look further out for suitable comparables and to make 
necessary adjustments to the price in order to account for dissimilarities between the comparables development and the subject site. Such adjustments include, 
but not limited to:

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

99

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

•  Adjustment because of the time of the transaction. Market conditions at the time of the sales transaction of a comparable property may differ from those on 

the valuation date of the property being valued. Factors that impact market conditions include rapidly appreciating or depreciating property values, changes in 
tax laws, building restrictions or moratoriums, fl uctuations in supply and demand, or any combination or forces working in concert to alter market conditions 
from one date to another.

•  Adjustment because of asking price and condition of payment. The special motivations of the parties to the transaction in many situations can affect the prices 
paid and even render some transactions as non-market. Examples of special conditions of sale include a higher price paid by a buyer because the parcel has 
synergistic, or marriage value; a lower price paid because a seller was in a hurry to conclude the sale; a fi nancial, business, or family relationship between 
the parties involved in the transaction, unusual tax considerations; lack of exposure of the property in the (open) market; or the prospect of lengthy litigation 
proceedings.

•  Adjustment because of size, shape and surface area. Where the physical characteristics of a comparable property vary from those of the subject property, each 

of the differences is considered, and the adjustment is made for the impact of each of these differences on value.

•  Adjustment because of location. The locations of the comparable sale properties and the subject property are compared to ascertain whether location and 

the immediate environment are infl uencing the prices paid. The better location a property is located in the more it is worth per square meter; and conversely 
the worse location a property is in the less it is worth per square meter. An adjustment is made to refl ect such differences based on the valuers’ professional 
experience. Extreme location differences may indicate that a transaction is not truly comparable and are disqualifi ed.

2b – Residual method

The residual method, in contrast, relies on an approach that is a combination of comparison and cost and it requires making a number of assumptions – any of 
which can affect the outcome in varying degrees.

Having established the development potential a residual valuation can be expressed as a simple equation: (value of completed development) – (development costs 
+ developers profi t) = land value. Each element of this equation is discussed in the following paragraphs.

Value of completed development

The value of the completed development is the market value of the proposed development assessed on the special assumption that the development is complete 
as at the date of valuation in the market conditions prevailing at that date. 

Development costs

The development costs include planning and design costs, construction costs, site related costs, holding costs, fi nance costs and contingencies.

Some larger schemes such as Casa Radio in Romania, Bangalore and Chennai in India are phased over time. Is such case the phasing is refl ected in the cash 
fl ows as deferment of some of costs to a date when it might be reasonable to expect them to be incurred. Similarly, not all receipts occur simultaneously.

Developer’s profi t

The nature of the development determines the selection of the profi t margin, or rate of return and the percentage to be adopted varies for each case. The 
developers profi t is expressed as a percentage of the cost of the completed development.

All of the trading properties were valued using the Residual technique (or the Discounted Cash Flows technique for operating shopping centers) with the exception 
of four projects (2012: six projects) with a total amount of EUR 15.5 million (2012: EUR 25.7 million) using the comparative method.

All the trading properties carrying amounts equals their net realizable values with the exception of Torun´, Suwałki and Łódz´  (Residential) in Poland and Casa Radio 
project in Romania.  (2012: Torun´, Suwałki and Łódz´  (Residential) in Poland, Casa Radio and Timis¸oara in Romania and Belgarde Plaza (Visnjicka) project in 
Serbia), where the carrying amount refl ects the cost.

3. Signifi cant estimates 

The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which 
are equity accounted:

100

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 11

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Group of assets

Valuation technique

Signifi cant unobservable inputs

Inter-relationship between key 
unobservable inputs and fair value 
measurement

Operating shopping centers – 
Poland

Operating shopping center – 
Latvia (Joint Venture)

Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation 
model considers the present value 
of the net cash fl ows expected to be 
generated by the shopping centers. The 
cash fl ow projections include specifi c 
estimates for 10 years. The expected 
net cash fl ows are discounted using a 
risk-adjusted discount rate.

Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation 
model considers the present value 
of the net cash fl ows expected to be 
generated by the shopping centers. The 
cash fl ow projections include specifi c 
estimates for 10 years. The expected 
net cash fl ows are discounted using a 
risk-adjusted discount rate.

• Estimated rental prices per SQM 
(EUR 3–40.0, weighted average 
EUR 6.56).

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

• Estimated exit yield is 8.75%. 
• Discount rate is 10.25%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

achieved within 2 years

• the estimated discount rates were lower 

(higher);

• The occupancy of the mall was higher 

(lower).

• Estimated rental prices per SQM 

(EUR 5.10–72.0, weighted average 
EUR 12.50).a

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

• Estimated exit yield is 8.00%. 
• Discount rate is 9.25%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

achieved within 1 year

• the estimated discount rates were lower 

Operating shopping center – 
Serbia

Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation 
model considers the present value 
of the net cash fl ows expected to be 
generated by the shopping centers. The 
cash fl ow projections include specifi c 
estimates for 10 years. The expected 
net cash fl ows are discounted using a 
risk-adjusted discount rate.

• Estimated rental prices per SQM 
(EUR 8–25.0, weighted average 
EUR 13.91).

• Estimated exit yield is 9.00%. 
• Discount rate is 11.00%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate

(higher);

• The occupancy of the mall was higher 

(lower).

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

• the estimated discount rates were lower 

(higher);

• The occupancy of the mall was higher 

(lower).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

101

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which 
are equity accounted:

Group of assets

Valuation technique

Signifi cant unobservable inputs

Inter-relationship between key 
unobservable inputs and fair value 
measurement

Operating shopping center – 
Czech Republic

Plots in CEE 
(except Casa Radio)

Discounted cash fl ows: The valuation 
model considers the present value 
of the net cash fl ows expected to be 
generated by the shopping centers. The 
cash fl ow projections include specifi c 
estimates for 10 years. The expected 
net cash fl ows are discounted using a 
risk-adjusted discount rate.

• Estimated rental prices per SQM 

(EUR 6.00–42.0, weighted average 
EUR 16.00).

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

• Estimated exit yield is 8.35%. 
• Discount rate is 10.02%
• Based on 100% occupancy rate to be 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

achieved within 1 year

• the estimated discount rates were lower 

(higher);

• The occupancy of the mall was higher 

(lower).

Residual method: The valuation 
model considers the net present value 
(based on an NPV factor) based on 
the estimated value of the project 
upon completion less the estimated 
development cost including a 
provision for the profi t for the potential 
development;

• Estimated weighted average rental 
prices per SQM is between EUR 
14.00 to EUR 20.00;

• The Estimated Exit Yield for the 
projects are between 8.00% 

• The construction cost of the projects 
are between 400 EUR/sqm for retail 
parks to 1,100 EUR /sqm for the 
malls;

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

• the estimated discount rates were lower 

(higher);

• The construction cost of the project were 

• The development fi nance rate is 

lower (higher);

7.00%

• The occupancy of the projects at 
opening are estimated at 95%.

• The developer’s profi t provision for the 

project were lower (higher);

• The development fi nance provision for 

the project were lower (higher);

• The estimated completion of the project 

were shorter (longer);

•  The occupancy of the mall were higher 

(lower);

• The land prices for comparable 

transactions on the market would be 
higher (lower)

• The characteristics of the project would 

be changed;

102

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
consolidated

cial statements

note 11

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

The following table shows the valuation techniques used in measuring the net realizable values of trading properties, including those held by joint ventures which 
are equity accounted:

Group of assets

Valuation technique

Signifi cant unobservable inputs

Inter-relationship between key 
unobservable inputs and fair value 
measurement

Casa Radio

Residual method: The valuation 
model considers the net present value 
(based on an NPV factor) based on 
the estimated value of the project 
upon completion less the estimated 
development cost including a 
provision for the profi t for the potential 
development

• Estimated weighted average rental 

prices per SQM  EUR 29.00;

• The Estimated Exit Yield is 7.00% 

for the mall and 8.00% for the offi ce 
component

• The construction cost of the project is 
1,400 EUR/sqm for the mall; 850 EUR/
sqm for the offi ces; 600 EUR/sqm for 
the residential component

The estimated fair value would increase 
(decrease) if:
• the estimated rental prices per sqm were 

higher (lower);

• the estimated yield rates were lower 

(higher);

• The construction cost of the project were 

lower (higher);

• The developer’s profi t provision for the 

• The development fi nance rate is 

project were lower (higher);

7.00%

• The occupancy of the project at 
opening is estimated at 95%

• The development fi nance provision for 

the project were lower (higher);

• The estimated completion of the project 

• The scheme would compose the 

were shorter (longer);

following components: (i) retail; (ii) 
offi ces; (iii) residential

•  The occupancy of the mall were higher 

(lower);

Bangalore and Chennai 
(Joint Ventures)

Residual method was used as well as 
follows: The valuation model considers 
the net present value (based on an NPV 
factor) based on the estimated value of 
the project upon completion less the 
estimated development cost including a 
provision for the profi t for the potential 
development

For residual approach:
• The sales price per sqm for the 

development is between INR 92,000 
and INR 126,000 subject to the size, 
location and the quality of the asset 
class

• The construction cost per sqm for the 
development is INR 21,000 to INR 
38,000 subject to location and the 
quality of the asset class

• The characteristics of the project would 

be changed

The estimated residual fair value would 
increase (decrease) if:
• the estimated sales prices per sqm were 

higher (lower);

• the estimated construction cost were 

lower (higher);

• The development fi nance provision for 

the project were lower (higher);

• The estimated completion of the project 

were shorter (longer);

• The characteristics of the project would 

be changed;

• The developer’s profi t provision for the 

project were lower (higher)

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

103

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

t
s
o
C
n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
 C

%
0
1
-

%
5
-

-

%
5

%
0
1

%
0
1
-

%
5
-

-

t
n
e
R

%
5

%
0
1

s
p
b
0
5
+

s
p
b
5
2
+

0

s
p
b
5
2
-

s
p
b
0
5
-

d
l
e
i
Y

y
t
r
e
p
o
r
P
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

0
3
6
,
6
4
1

5
4
4
,
2
5
1

0
3
2
,
8
5
1

5
6
0
,
4
6
1

0
3
8
,
9
6
1

5
7
1
,
9
4
1

5
8
5
,
3
5
1

0
3
2
,
8
5
1

5
7
1
,
3
6
1

0
7
4
,
8
6
1

s
r
e
t
n
e
c

i

g
n
p
p
o
h
s

g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o

n
a
i
b
r
e
S

5
2
2
,
9
3

0
0
5
,
0
4

5
7
7
,
1
4

0
5
0
,
3
4

5
2
3
,
4
4

5
7
5
,
9
3

5
2
6
,
0
4

5
7
7
,
1
4

5
7
9
,
2
4

5
2
2
,
4
4

r
e
t
n
e
c

i

g
n
p
p
o
h
s

g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o

h
s
i
l

o
P

g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o

h
c
e
z
C

0
0
8
,
6
1

5
2
5
,
7
1

5
7
6
,
7
1

0
5
9
,
8
1

5
7
6
,
9
1

5
2
6
,
6
1

0
5
1
,
7
1

5
7
6
,
7
1

0
5
2
,
8
1

0
5
8
,
8
1

r
e
t
n
e
c

i

g
n
p
p
o
h
s

:
s
n
o
i
t
a
u
a
v

l

n

i

d
e
s
u

s
t
u
p
n

i

y
e
k

n

i

s
e
g
n
a
h
c

i

g
n
w
o

l
l

o
f

e
h
t

i

g
n
m
u
s
s
a

,
)
R
U
E

f
o

s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t

n
i
(

s
t
c
e
o
r
p

j

n
i
a
t
r
e
c

f
o

e
u
l
a
v

n
o

s
i
s
y
l
a
n
a

y
t
i
v
i
t
i
s
n
e
s

s
e
d
i
v
o
r
p

e
l
b
a
t

i

g
n
w
o

l
l

o
f

e
h
T

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

A
/
N

5
7
6
,
2
8

0
0
2
,
5
8

5
2
7
,
7
8

0
5
2
,
0
9

5
7
7
,
2
9

5
2
5
,
2
8

0
5
0
,
5
8

5
2
7
,
7
8

5
7
5
,
0
9

0
0
6
,
3
9

)

%
0
5

s
i

t
s
o
C
n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
 C

%
0
1
-

%
5
-

-

%
5

%
0
1

%
0
1
-

%
5
-

-

t
n
e
R

%
5

%
0
1

s
p
b
0
5
+

s
p
b
5
2
+

0

s
p
b
5
2
-

s
p
b
0
5
-

d
l
e
i
Y

E
E
C
n
i

s
t
o
l
P

0
0
4
,
9
1

0
5
3
,
7
1

0
0
3
,
5
1

0
5
2
,
3
1

0
0
2
,
1
1

5
7
6
,
9

0
0
5
,
2
1

0
0
3
,
5
1

5
2
1
,
8
1

0
5
9
,
0
2

5
7
3
,
2
1

0
0
8
,
3
1

0
0
3
,
5
1

0
0
9
,
6
1

5
7
5
,
8
1

a
z
a
l
P
s
a
e
r
i
P

a
z
a
l
P
e
d
a
r
g
l
e
B

0
0
1
,
2
2

5
2
1
,
9
1

0
5
1
,
6
1

0
5
1
,
3
1

5
7
1
,
0
1

5
2
2
,
8

5
7
1
,
2
1

0
5
1
,
6
1

0
0
1
,
0
2

0
5
0
,
4
2

0
0
0
,
3
1

5
2
5
,
4
1

0
5
1
,
6
1

0
5
8
,
7
1

0
5
6
,
9
1

)
P
U
M

(

5
2
6
,
8
0
2

5
7
3
,
1
9
1

0
5
1
,
4
7
1

0
0
9
,
6
5
1

5
7
6
,
9
3
1

0
5
2
,
2
2
1

0
0
2
,
8
4
1

0
5
1
,
4
7
1

0
0
1
,
0
0
2

5
2
0
,
6
2
2

0
0
0
,
9
4
1

0
5
1
,
1
6
1

0
5
1
,
4
7
1

0
5
0
,
8
8
1

0
5
9
,
2
0
2

i

o
d
a
R
a
s
a
C

.
s
u
t
a
t
s

s
t
c
e
j
o
r
p

n
i
a
m

r
o
f

e
l
b
a
t

y
r
a
m
m
u
s

a

s
i

f
a
e
l
r
e
v
O

g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o

n
a
i
v
t
a
L

r
e
t
n
e
c

i

g
n
p
p
o
h
s

%
0
0
1

-

e
r
u
t
n
e
V

,
d
e
s
o
l
c
s
i
d

e
u
l
a
v

e
r
a
h
s

y
n
a
p
m
o
C

i

t
n
o
J

n

i

d
l
e
h
(

104

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 11

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Purchase 

Holding 

Planned 

Carrying 

Carrying

Gross 

amount 

amount

Lettable  December 31,  December 31,

Project  

Location  

year   Rate (%)   Nature of rights  

Permit status  

Area (sqm) 

 2013 (MEUR) 

2012 (MEUR) 

Suwałki Plaza 

Poland 

2006 

100 

Ownership 

Operating shopping center 

20,000 

38.7 

Zgorzelec Plaza 

Poland 

2006 

100 

Ownership 

Operating shopping center 

13,000 

17.1 

Torun´ Plaza 

Poland 

2007 

100 

Ownership 

Operating shopping center 

40,000 

67.4 

(starting Q1 2010)

(starting Q2 2010)

Łódz´  (Residential) 

Poland 

2001 

100 

Ownership/  

Planning permit valid 

80,000* 

5.5 

(starting Q4 2011)

Łódz´  Plaza 

Kielce Plaza 

Leszno Plaza 

Liberec Plaza 

Poland 

Poland 

Poland 

Czech Republic 

Roztoky 

Czech Republic 

Koregaon Park Plaza 

India 

2009 

2008 

2008 

2006 

2007 

2006 

Perpetual usufruct 

100 

100 

100 

100 

Perpetual usufruct 

Planning permit pending 

Perpetual usufruct 

Planning permit pending 

Perpetual usufruct 

Planning permit valid 

Ownership 

Operating shopping center 

35,000 

33,000 

16,000 

17,000 

(starting Q1 2009)

100 

100 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Disposed in July 2013 

14,000* 

Operating shopping center  

41,000 

(starting Q1 2012) 

7.9 

4.0 

1.7 

17.7 

- 

40.3 

38.7

18.9

67.3

5.5

13.6

4.8

1.9

29.4

5.5

55.8

Casa Radio 

Romania 

2007 

75 

Leased for 49 years 

Detailed Urban Plan  

555,000* 

152.3 

157.8

Ias¸i Plaza 

Slatina Plaza 

Târgu Mures¸ Plaza 

Hunedoara Plaza 

Timis¸oara Plaza 

Constant¸a Plaza 

Csíki Plaza 

Kragujevac Plaza  

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Serbia 

Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) Serbia 

Belgrade Plaza (MUP) 

Serbia 

Shumen Plaza 

Bulgaria 

Arena Plaza extension 

Hungary 

Pireas Plaza 

Greece 

Other small plots, grouped 

Total 

*   GBA (sqm) 

2007 

2007 

2008 

2008 

2007 

2009 

2007 

2007 

2007 

2007 

2007 

2005 

2002 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Currently 

permit valid (“PUD”) 

Planning permit valid 

Planning permit valid 

Planning permit valid 

Planning permit valid 

Zoning valid 

Existing building 

Planning permit valid 

Operating shopping center 

Construction lease  

(starting Q1 2012)

period (99 years) with 

subsequent ownership

Ownership 

Ownership 

Ownership 

Location Permit valid 

Under negotiations 

Planning permit valid 

Land use rights 

Building permit valid 

Ownership 

Building permit valid 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

58,000 

17,000 

10,000 

14,000 

36,000 

18,000 

14,000 

22,000 

32,000 

70,000* 

20,000 

40,000 

26,000 

11.6 

1.7 

3.5 

2.4 

10.8 

6.3 

5.6 

41.8 

19.0 

16.2 

2.1 

3.4 

15.3 

2.9 

13.1

1.8

6.1

2.9

14.8

11.3

10.0

42.1

25.9

45.5

4.6

3.4

27.3

4.5

495.2 

612.5

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

105

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 12 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 

Land and 
buildings 
€’000 

Equipment 
€’000 

Fixtures  
and fi ttings 
€’000 

Airplane1 
€’000 

Cost
Balance at January 1, 2012* 
Additions 
Disposals  
Exchange rate effect 

Balance at December 31, 2012* 

Additions 
Disposals  
Exchange rate effect 

Balance at December 31, 2013 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment 
Balance at January 1, 2012* 
Depreciation  
Impairment expenses2 
Disposals 
Exchange rate effect 

Balance at December 31, 2012* 

Depreciation  
Disposals 
Exchange rate effect 

Balance at December 31, 2013 

Net carrying amounts 
At December 31, 2013 
At December 31, 2012 
At January 1, 2012 

7,181 
- 
- 
- 

7,181 

- 
- 
- 

7,181 

2,606 
85 
- 
- 
- 

2,691 

85 
- 
- 

2,776 

4,405 
4,490 
4,575 

4,529 
462 
(592) 
(42) 

4,357 

75 
(749) 
(141) 

3,542 

3,421 
370 
- 
(355) 
(33) 

3,403 

194 
(333) 
(44) 

3,220 

322 
954 
1,108 

1,397  
- 
- 
- 

1,397  

- 
- 
- 

4,737 
- 
- 
- 

4,737 

- 
- 
- 

1,397  

4,737 

1,020 
34 
- 
- 
- 

1,054 

17 
- 
- 

1,071 

326 
343 
377 

2,567 
127 
449 
- 
- 

3,143 

127 
- 
- 

3,270 

1,467 
1,594 
2,170 

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

Major additions/disposals/impairments during the period

1  The airplane of the Company is pledged as a security for a bank facility utilized for the purchase of the airplane. For the selling of the airplane refer to note 38(A).

2  In 2012, the Company recorded a loss due to impairment of its airplane of EUR 0.4 million, based on external valuation.   

NOTE 13 - INVESTMENT PROPERTY 

Balance at 1 January 
Disposal of Investment property (refer to note 34(E)) 
Fair value revaluation (refer to note 29) 

Balance at 31 December 

2013 
€’000 

14,489 
(10,222) 
(4,267) 

- 

Total
€’000

17,844
462
(592)
(42)

17,672

75
(749)
(141)

16,857

9,614
616
449
(355)
(33)

10,291

423
(333)
(44)

10,337

6,520
7,381
8,230

2012
€’000

13,652
-
837

14,489

106

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 12 / note 13 / note 14

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 14 - EQUITY ACCOUNTED INVESTEES  

The Group has the following interest (directly and indirectly) in the below joint ventures (the Group has no investment in associates), as at 
December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Company name 

Country 

Activity 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Interest of holding 

(percentage) as at 

Interest of holding

(percentage) as at

Elbit Plaza USA LP (“EPUS”)1 

Elbit Plaza USA II LP 

P-One Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 2 

Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd. (“EPI”) 

Bas - Adams Invest S.R.L 

Bas - Colorado Invest S.R.L 

Bas - Malibu Invest S.R.L 

Bas - Spring Invest S.R.L 

Bas - Sunny Invest S.R.L 

Bas - Primavera Invest S.R.L 

Bas development S.R.L 

SIA Diksna (“Diksna”) 

USA 

USA 

India 

Cyprus 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Romania 

Inactive 

Inactive 

Residential 

Mixed-use 

large scale projects

Residential 

Residential 

Residential 

Residential 

Residential 

Residential 

Residential 

Latvia 

Operating shopping center 

Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.3 

Hungary 

SBI Hungary Ingatlanforgalmazó és Építo˝ Kft. (“Új Udvar”)3 

Hungary 

Mixed-use project 

Mixed-use project 

1  Refer also to note 34(H) for the dissolving of investee.

2  Refer also to note 34(D) for the selling of the investee.

3  Refer also to note 34(F) for the selling of the investees.

None of the joint ventures are publicly listed.  

The movement in equity accounted investees (in aggregation) was as follows:

Balance as at 1 January 
Investments in equity-accounted investees  
Share in results of equity-accounted investees, net of tax 
Reclassifi cation of EPUS1 
Write-down of Equity-accounted investees2  
Effect of movements in exchange rates 
EPUS dissolved1 
Equity-accounted investees disposed3 

Balance as at 31 December4 

N/A 

50% 

N/A 

47.5% 

25% 

25% 

12.5% 

25% 

25% 

25% 

25% 

50% 

N/A 

N/A 

2013 
€’000 

161,779 
1,849 
952 
- 
(56,417) 
(15,036) 
(32,410) 
(20,576) 

40,141 

50%

50%

50%

47.5%

25%

25%

12.5%

25%

25%

25%

25%

50%

50%

35%

2012
€’000

156,334
2,113
1,475
32,364
(23,443)
(7,064)
-
-

161,779

1  EPUS was the top holding company of the US operations, holding all the discontinued operations in the US. Upon the disposal of all US assets, EPUS remained with undistributed cash 

amounts, and had no activity, therefore the EPUS remaining asset was deemed not to be part of the discontinued operations, and therefore reclassifi ed to equity accounted investees.    

EPUS was dissolved in March 2013, and all of the remaining cash in it was distributed as liquidation dividend to the owners. Refer also to note 34(H).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

107

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

2  Breakdown of the Group’s share of write downs (reversals of write downs) of trading properties projects held by equity accounted investees is as follows:

Project name (holding company name) 

Bangalore (held by equity accounted investee EPI) 

Chennai (held by equity accounted investee EPI) 

Kharadi (held by equity accounted investee P-One) 

Dream Island (held by equity accounted investee Ercorner) 

BAS projects (Grouped – held by 7 different entities)  

Riga Plaza (held by equity accounted investee Diksna) 

Új Udvar (held by equity accounted investee SBI Hungary) 

Total 

The year ended 

December 31, 2013 

The year ended

December 31, 2012

€’000 

31,017 
20,745 
4,311 
- 
- 
(1,513) 
1,857 

56,417 

€’000

-

-

1,157

12,183

10,055

(139)

187

23,443

3  Refer also to note 34(D) and 34(F) for the selling of Ercorner, Új Udvar and P-One. 

4  As of December 31, 2013, the loan to equity accounted investee Diksna totalled EUR 7.04 million (December 31, 2012 – EUR 6.9 million). Other investment in equity accounted investees 

is either through various equity instruments, or by loans to cover negative equity position considered part of the Group’s net investment in the investee. 

Material joint ventures

Within the joint ventures, two joint ventures were deemed as material, and these are EPI (due to holding of major schemes in Bangalore and Chennai) and Diksna 
(being the only active shopping center held through a joint venture).  The summarized fi nancial information of the material joint ventures is as follows: 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012 

December 31, 2012

Current assets* 

Trading properties 

Interest bearing loans from banks – current liability 

Other current liabilities 

Group loan to Diksna 

Net assets (100%) 

Group share of net asset (50%)** 

Purchase price allocated to trading property 

Carrying amount of interest in joint venture 

EPI 

€’0000 

1,274 

46,752 

- 

(674) 

- 

47,352 

23,676 

- 

23,676 

Diksna 

€’000 

2,776 

87,725 

(59,046) 

(1,275) 

(14,078) 

16,102 

8,051 

- 

8,051 

EPI 

€’000 

952 

142,711 

- 

(1,279) 

- 

142,384 

71,192 

18,750 

89,942 

Diksna
€’000 

3,100

84,700

(63,850)

(1,616)

(13,898)

8,436

4,218
- 

4,218

*  Including cash and cash equivalents in the amount of EUR 1.1 million (2012 - EUR 1.1 million). 

** Though EPI is 47.5% held by the Company, the Company is accounted for 50% of the results, as the third party holding 5% in EPI is deemed not to participate in accumulated losses, 

hence EI and the Company, the holders of the remaining 95% each account for 50% of the results of EPI.

108

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 14

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

The year ended 

The year ended 

The year ended 

The year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012 

December 31, 2012

Revenue 

Cost of operations 

Interest expenses 

Gain from refi nance of loan 

Write downs (uplift) 

EPI 

€’000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(66,024) 

Total net profi t (loss) and comprehensive income (100%)  

(67,446) 

Group share of Profi t (loss) and comprehensive income (50%)  

(33,723) 

Interest income on Diksna loan 

Impairment of purchase price allocated to trading property 

(18,750) 

Total results from investee 

(52,473) 

Immaterial joint ventures information

Diksna 

€’0000 

10,122 

(4,304) 

(2,016) 

1,800 

3,026 

7,666 

3,833 

90 

- 

3,923 

EPI 

€’000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(1,594) 

(797) 

- 

(797) 

Diksna
€’000 

8,678

(3,892)

(2,186)

-

278

2,606

1,303

133

-

1,436

With the exception of EPI and Diksna, all other joint ventures are considered immaterial. Three of these joint ventures were sold in the course of 2013, one was 
dissolved and the Company is currently negotiating for concluding a transaction in respect of the BAS projects as well. The aggregation of the information in 
respect of these immaterial joint ventures was as follows (the Group’s part):

Current assets 

Trading properties 

Interest bearing loans from banks* 

Current liabilities 

Carrying amount of interest in joint venture 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

61 

7,152 

(5,727) 

(70) 

1,416 

€’000

34,011

55,554

(26,529)

(2,366)

60,670

*  As of December 31, 2013, the Company has recourse on interest payments of these interest bearing loans from banks. The loans bear interest of three months Euribor + margin of 6%.

Revenues 

Cost of operations 

Write downs (refer to impairment table above)  

Loss and comprehensive income 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

801 

(674) 

(6,168) 

(6,915) 

€’000

7,171

(4,799)

(23,582)

(22,607)

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

109

 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 15 - DERIVATIVES 

The table below summarizes the results of the 2013 and 2012 derivatives activity, as well as the outstanding derivatives as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Derivative type 

Nominal 

Fair value of  

amount as of  

derivatives at  

December 31, 

December 31, 

2013 

2013 

Currency options1 

N/A 

Cross currency 

Interest Rate SWAP2  N/A 

Cross currency 

Interest Rate SWAP   N/A 

Interest Rate Swap 

EUR 25 million 

EUR 30 million 

EUR 35.5 million 

(“IRS”) 13 

IRS 24 

IRS 35 

Total 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

(222) 

(475) 

(213) 

(910) 

Gain 

(loss)  

in 

2013  

(2,364) 

(251) 

N/A 

188 

(31) 

187 

Fair value of  

derivatives at  

December 31, 

2012 

N/A 

(817) 

N/A 

(706) 

(1,136) 

(661) 

Gain 

(loss) 

in 

2012 

Maturity

date of

derivative

11,683 

N/A

966 

419 

(62) 

(462) 

(661) 

November 2013

Settled in January  

2012

June 2014

December 2014

December 2017

(2,271) 

(3,320) 

11,883 

1  Selling options strategy (by writing call and put options through major Israeli and foreign banks) in order to manage its foreign currency risk (EUR-NIS) inherent in its long-term 

debentures series A and series B issued in NIS. The Company suspended its selling option strategy effective from July 1, 2013.

2  The Company was paying a fi xed interest of 6.98% based on a nominal EUR amount of EUR 15.1 million and receiving an interest of six months WIBOR + 4.5% with the same 

amortization schedule as the Polish bonds (refer to note 21). The swap was settled in March 2013 for a cash payment of EUR 0.8 million, in order to release EUR 2.7 million restricted 

cash served as guarantee in respect of the SWAP. 

3  In respect of Suwałki project loan. The project company pays EUR fi xed interest rate of 2.13% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until June 30, 2014.

4  In respect of Kragujevac project loan. The project company pays EUR fi xed interest rate of 1.85% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until December 31, 2014. 

Refer to note 33 for details on the guarantee.

5  In respect of Torun´ project loan. The project company pays fi xed interest rate of 1% and receives three months EURIBOR on a quarterly basis, until December 31, 2017. Regarding 

pledges in respect of derivative activity refer to note 33d(2). 

None of the abovementioned activities (including 2013 transactions) qualifi ed for hedge accounting. 

Fair value measurement 

Fair values of the SWAP may be determined in whole or in part using valuation techniques based on assumptions that are not supported by prices from current 
market transactions or observable market data, where current prices or observable market data are not available. 

Factors such as bid-offer spread, credit profi le, collateral requirements and model uncertainty are taken into account, as appropriate, when fair values are 
calculated using valuation techniques. Valuation techniques incorporate assumptions that other market participants would use in their valuations, including 
assumptions about interest rate yield curves, and middle exchange rates, as determined by relevant central banks at each cut dates.

110

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 15 / note 16

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 16 - INTEREST BEARING LOANS FROM BANKS  

This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s interest-bearing loans and borrowings, which are measured at amortised cost. For more 
information about the Group’s exposure to interest rate, foreign currency and liquidity risk, refer to note 32.  All interest bearing loans from banks are secured.  
Terms and conditions of outstanding loans were as follows:

December 31, 2013 
€’000 

December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

Non-current loans 
Investment property secured bank loan 
Other secured bank loan 

Total 

Current loans (including current maturities of long-term loans) 
Trading properties secured bank loans 
Investment property secured bank loans 
Other secured bank loans 

Total 

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

Below is the breakdown of all outstanding bank loans:

Nominal interest rate 

Currency 

Torun´ project secured bank loan1 
Liberec project secured bank loan2 
Suwałki project secured bank loan1 
Zgorzelec project secured bank loan1, 3 
Kragujevac project secured bank loan1, 4 
Koregaon Park project secured bank loan5 
Koregaon Park project secured bank loan 

3M EURIBOR+3% 
3M EURIBOR+2.7% 
3M EURIBOR+1.65% 
3M EURIBOR+2.75% 
3M EURIBOR+5% 
13.25% 
11.5% 

Other secured bank loans 
Other secured bank loans6 

6M TELBOR+6% 
3M USD LIBOR+4% 

EUR 
EUR 
EUR 
EUR 
EUR 
INR 
INR 

NIS 
USD 

Year of 
maturity 

2017 
2014 
2020 
2016 
2027 
2021 
2013 

2013 
2014 

Investment property secured bank loan  

3M EURIBOR+1.75% 

EUR 

2016 

- 
- 

- 

172,810 
- 
2,528 

175,338 

3,175
2,598

5,773

188,058
469
17,450

205,977

December 31,  
2013 

€’000 

47,905 
20,498 
31,595 
21,993 
29,108 
21,710 
- 

December 31, 
Restated* 2012
Carrying amoung
 €’000

49,028
21,066
32,303
21,608
30,123
26,943
6,987 

172,810 

188,058

- 
2,528 

2,528 

- 

17,268
2,780 

20,048

3,644

Total interest bearing liabilities 

175,338 

211,750

1  IRS on bank loans – refer to note 15. 

2  Liberec loan – recourse loan.  Default in payment has occurred, and certain loan covenants are breached – the Company is on continuous negotiations with fi nancing banks for obtaining a 

waiver.

3  Zgorzelec loan – mostly non-recourse loan (except a component of a EUR 2.25 million which is recourse) – Certain loan covenants are breached – the Company has obtained a waiver for 

all covenants till maturity of the loan.  The Company has also pledged it’s plot in Leszno, Poland (refer also to note 11) in favour of the fi nancing bank.

4  Kragujevac loan – non-recourse loan – Certain loan covenants are breached – the Company is in continuous negotiations with fi nancing banks for obtaining a waiver.

5  Koregaon Park loan – out of 2013 balance, an amount of EUR 14 million is recourse loan. Refer to note 34 (G) in respect of the selling of the Koregaon Park project.

6  In respect of the airplane held by the Company. Refer also to note 38(A).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

111

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Covenants

Since the Company has defaulted in its payments to bondholders, a cross-default clause covenant in most bank facilities might cause certain bank facilities to be 
considered as breached, and therefore banks may demand immediate repayment of such facilities. The Company has therefore reclassifi ed all bank facilities to 
short-term.

In certain cases, where a recourse loan is outstanding, the fi nancing bank can become a creditor of the Company itself, in case the proceeds from selling the 
pledged asset do not cover the debt.

However, up to the date of approval of these fi nancial statements, there has been no such demand from any of the fi nancing banks for such immediate repayment 
of any of the bank facilities, and the Company’s management estimates that no such demand will take place before the fi nalization of the restructuring process.

NOTE 17 - TRADE PAYABLES 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Currency 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

Construction related payables 

Other trade payables 

Mainly in INR 

1,115 

1,317 

2,432 

3,549

4,020

        7,569

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

Main decrease in 2013 is attributable to payment to construction suppliers in respect of the projects in India, Poland and Serbia.

NOTE 18 - RELATED PARTIES PAYABLES 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Currency 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

EI Group- ultimate parent company – expenses recharged 

Other related parties  

EUL (parent company) 

EUR, USD 

EUR 

EUR, USD 

672 

272 

- 

944 

144

15

387

546

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

For payments (including share based payments) to related parties refer to note 35. Transactions with related parties are priced at an arm’s length basis.

112

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 17 / note 18 / note 19 / note 20

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 19 - OTHER  LIABILITIES 

Short-term 

Obligations to tenants  

Advance payment in respect of selling of shopping center (refer to note 34(G)) 

Loan from non-controlling interest 

Obligation in respect of plot purchase  

Accrued bond and bank interest 

Accrued expenses and commissions  

Government institutions and fees  

Salaries and related expenses 

Other 

Total 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

Currency 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

EUR 

INR 

EUR 

Mainly EUR 

Mainly NIS 

2,613 

2,343 

1,455 

1,380 

2,377 

305 

416 

174 

156 

11,219 

2,645

-

1,454

1,380

803

505

361

275

225

7,648

* Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

NOTE 20 - DEBENTURES AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS 

The Company is measuring part of its debentures Series A (raised in July 2007) and debentures Series B (raised in February and May 2008 and listed in the Tel 
Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”) at fair value through profi t or loss. Both debentures principal are updated based on the change in the Israeli Consumer Price Index 
(“CPI”), meaning that every 1 percent change in Israeli CPI is causing a one (1) percent change in the principal value of the bond, and also on the interest paid. 
Indexation is made on a monthly basis.

Accrued interest on both debentures is paid every six months. Debentures Series A and Series B raised from 2009 onwards are presented at amortized cost (refer 
to note 21). Below is a summary of information on the debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss:

      Series A debentures 

      Series B debentures

Fair value 

CPI adjusted 

Par value 

Fair value 

CPI adjusted 

Par value 

Total Par value

January 1, 2013 (TNIS) 

138,366 

203,150 

Reissuance (repayment) 2013 (TNIS)* 

December 31, 2013 (TNIS) 

173,554 

January 1, 2013 (TEUR) 

December 31, 2013 (TEUR) 

28,120 

36,294 

229,868 

41,286 

48,071 

171,652 

18,941 

190,593 

34,884 

39,857 

433,147 

549,490 

294,989 

88,027 

61,689 

373,313 

111,671 

78,068 

478,774 

(159,591) 

319,183 

97,300 

66,748 

650,426

(140,650)

509,776

*  One fi fth of outstanding Series A bond was scheduled to be repaid on December 31, 2013. However, all payments on both Series A and B were withheld effective November 2013 (refer 

also to note 34(A)). One third of outstanding debentures Series B (with par value of NIS 159,591 thousands) was repaid on July 1, 2013 in a total amount of EUR 39.1 million (2012 – 

repayment of NIS 193,922 thousands par value in a total amount of EUR 44.6 million).  

Both debentures series are rated (effective as of the reporting date and of signing these fi nancial statements) D by S&P Maalot Ltd. on a local scale (down from ilB 
in November 2013). The update followed the Company’s announcement that it would withhold payment on the upcoming debentures maturities.    

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

113

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Prior to the Group’s default and the potential impact of the restructuring plan (see note 34(A)) Debentures Series A bear an annual interest rate of 4.5% (to be paid 
semi-annually) with 8 annual equal par value principal instalments between December 2010 and 2017; and Debentures Series B bear an annual interest rate of 
5.4% (paid semi-annually) with 5 annual equal par value principal instalments between July 2011 and 2015. 

All debentures were reclassifi ed to current liabilities, in view of the decision to withhold all payments to creditors, which was an event of default. For more details 
on the debt restructuring plan, refer to note 34(A).

Fair value

The fair value of debentures is determined by an active market price quotation, as the debentures are traded in the TASE. 

NOTE 21 - DEBENTURES AT AMORTISED COST  

Bonds issued in Israel

January 1, 2013 (NIS)  

Re-issuance 

Repayment 2013* 

December 31, 2013 

Series A debentures 

Series B debentures

Par value 

TNIS 

- 

54,577 

- 

54,577 

Par value 

TNIS 

251,251 

8,800 

(86,684) 

173,367 

Total 

TNIS 

251,251 

63,377 

(86,684) 

227,944 

CPI adjusted 

CPI adjusted

TNIS 

288,362 

TEUR

58,603

268,592 

56,168

*   One fi fth of the outstanding Series A bond was scheduled to be repaid on December 31, 2013. However, all payments on both Series A and B debentures were withheld effective November 

2013 (refer also to note 34(A)).  

One third of outstanding debentures Series B (with par value of NIS 86,684 thousands) was repaid on July 1, 2013 in a total amount of EUR 21.2 million (2012 – 
repayment of NIS 86,074 thousands par value in a total amount of EUR 20.7 million)

Bonds issued in Poland

On November 16, 2010, the Company completed the fi rst tranche of a bond offering to Polish institutional investors. The Company raised a total of PLN 60 million 
(approximately EUR 15.2 million).   

Prior to the Group’s default and the potential impact of the restructuring as described in note 34(A), the unsecured bearer bonds governed by Polish law (the 
“Bonds”) had a three year maturity at an interest rate of six months Wibor plus 4.5%. Interest was to be paid every six months and the principal due in November 
2013. However, this payment, as well as all other payments on debentures were withheld effective November 2013 (refer also to note 34(A)).  

For debt covenants refer to note 33d(3).    

As at December 31, 2013, the amortized cost is EUR 14,468 thousands (December 31, 2012- EUR 14,678 thousands). 

114

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 20 / note 21 / note 22

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 22 - RECOGNIZED DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES  

Deferred taxes recognized are attributable to the following items:

December 31, 2012 

Recognized in 

December 31, 

Assets/(liabilities) 2013 

Investment property 

Property, equipment and other assets 

Debentures and structures at fair value through profi t or loss 

Derivatives 

Available for sale fi nancial assets* 

Tax value of loss carry-forwards recognized** 

Deferred tax liability, net 

Restated1 

€’000 

(1,003) 

(293) 

(9,588) 

(1,569)  

(184) 

5,707 

(6,930) 

Profi t or loss 2013 

€’000 

1,003 

(86) 

9,588 

1,569 

184 

(5,707) 

(6,551) 

*  Transferred to profi t or loss, following the disposal of all available for sale fi nancial assets.

** Due to tax losses created on the Company. 

1  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

December 31, 

2011 restated1 

Recognized in  

Recognized in 

Profi t or loss 

comprehensive income 

Assets/(liabilities) 2012 

Investment property 

Property, equipment and other assets 

€’000 

(804) 

(292) 

Debentures and structures at fair value through profi t or loss  (14,496) 

Derivatives 

Available for sale fi nancial assets* 

Tax value of loss carry-forwards recognized 

Deferred tax liability, net 

*  Change included in comprehensive income.

(1,391) 

446 

3,348 

(13,189) 

€’000 

(199) 

(1) 

4,908 

(178) 

- 

2,359 

6,889 

€’000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(630) 

- 

(630) 

2013

 €’000

-

(379)

-

-

-

-

(379)

December 31,

2012 Restated1
€’000 

(1,003)

(293)

 (9,588)

(1,569) 

(184)

5,707

(6,930)

1  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

Unrecognized deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of tax losses in a total amount of EUR 90,043 thousands (2012: EUR 91,574 thousand).

Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of these items because it is not probable that future taxable profi t will be available against which the 
Group can utilize the benefi ts there from. As of December 31, 2013 the expiry date status of tax losses to be carried forward is as follows:

Total tax losses carried forward  

2014 

2015 

130,459 

10,991 

21,113 

2016 

8,249 

2017 

2018 

After 2018 

12,061 

16,605 

61,440

Tax losses are mainly generated from operations in Czech Republic, Romania, Serbia, Latvia and the Netherlands.  Tax settlements may be subjected to 
inspections by tax authorities.  Accordingly, the amounts shown in the fi nancial statements may change at a later date as a result of the fi nal decision of the tax 
authorities.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

115

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 23 - EQUITY  

December 31, 2013 

Remarks 

Number of shares 

December 31, 2012
Number of shares 

Authorized ordinary shares of par value EUR 0.01 each 

1,000,000,000 

1,000,000,000

Issued and fully paid: 

At the beginning of the year 

Exercise of share options  

At the end of the year 

See (a) below 

297,186,138 

- 

297,174,515

11,623

297,186,138 

297,186,138

a.  In the course of 2012, 108,335 vested options were exercised into 11,623 shares of EUR 0.01. In the course of 2013 there was no exercise of options. 

Share based payment reserve

Other capital reserve is in respect of Employee Share Option Plans (“ESOP”) in the total amount of EUR 35,313 as of December 31, 2013 (2012 – EUR 34,889).  
Regarding the amendments of ESOP 1 and ESOP No. 2 and its effect on other capital reserves refer to note 25.

Translation reserve

The translation reserve comprises, as of December 31, 2013, all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the fi nancial statements of foreign 
operations in India.

Dividend policy

Following the withholding of payments of all corporate level debt and in line with the restructuring plan (refer to note 34(A)), the Company’s Board of Directors 
and management will commit to certain restrictions on dividends. 

116

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 23 / note 24 / note 25

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 24 - EARNINGS PER SHARE  

The calculation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) at December 31, 2013 was based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of EUR 218,073 thousand 
(2012: loss of EUR 86,163 thousand) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding of 297,181 thousand (2012: 297,181 thousand).   

The calculation of basic EPS at December 31, 2013 from continuing operations was based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of EUR 218,138 
thousand (2012 – EUR 84,119 thousand). 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (for both EPS and EPS from continuing operations)

In thousands of shares with a EUR 0.01 par value 

Issued ordinary shares at 1 January 

Share based payment - exercise of options 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 31 December 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

297,181 

- 

297,181 

€’000

297,175

6

297,181

The calculation of diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for comparative fi gures is calculated as follows:

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (diluted) 

In thousands of shares with a EUR 0.01 par value 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (basic) 

Effect of share options on issue 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (diluted) at 31 December 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

297,181 

- 

297,181 

€’000

297,181

792

297,973

The average market value of the Company’s shares for purposes of calculating the dilutive effect of share options was based on quoted market prices for the 
period that the options were outstanding.

Refer to note 37 for calculations of earnings per share from discontinued operation. 

NOTE 25 - EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN  

On October 26, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the grant of up to 33,834,586 non-negotiable options for the Company’s ordinary shares to the 
Company’s board members, employees in the company and other persons who provide services to the Company including employees of the Group (“Offerees”).  
The options were granted to the Offerees for no consideration. 

On November 22, 2011 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved to amend the 1st ESOP to extend the Option Term (i.e., 
as defi ned in the 1st ESOP, being the term during which options can be exercised under the 1st ESOP) from seven (7) to ten (10) years from the Date of Grant. As 
a result the Company record an incremental fair value of EUR 955,433 which were included in the consolidated income statement.  

Furthermore, 2nd ESOP plan was adopted on November 22, 2011 which is based on the terms of the 1st ESOP as amended in accordance with the terms as 
referred to above, with a couple of amendments, the most important of which is the total number of options to be granted under the 2nd ESOP is fourteen million 
(14) and a cap of GBP 2. 

It is noted that, on the basis of all 14 options being granted under the 2nd ESOP and fully exercised thereafter, this would have an effect of dilution of up to three 
percent (3%) (on fully diluted basis) of the issued share capital as at October 2011.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

117

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

On November 22, 2012 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved to amend the 1st ESOP to extend the Option Term (i.e., 
as defi ned in the 1st ESOP, being the term during which options can be exercised under the 1st ESOP) from ten (10) to fi fteen (15) years from the Date of Grant. 
As a result the Company record an incremental fair value of EUR 0.5 million which were included in the consolidated income statement.  

Exercise of the options is subject to the following mechanism:

Grant date / employees entitled 

ESOP  No.1

Option grant to key management at October 27, 2006  

Option grant to employees at October 27, 2006 

Total granted in 2006  

Total granted in 20072 

Total granted in 20082 

Total granted in 20092 

Total granted in 20102 

Total granted in 20112 

ESOP  No.2

Total granted in 20112 

Total granted in 20122 

Total granted in 20132 

Vesting 

conditions 

Contractual life

options1

Number 

of options 

13,218,073 

1,894,020 

15,112,093 

1,109,490 

768,887 

441,668 

see (3) below 

see (3) below 

see (3) below 

see (3) below 

see (3) below 

Three years of service  

- 

Three years of service  

150,000 

Three years of service  

4,874,000 

Three years of service  

970,000 

Three years of service  

1,465,000 

Three years of service 

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

15 years

10 years

Total share options Granted   

24,891,138

1  Following the 4th amendment of ESOP1, the contractual life for stock options granted changed from 10 years to 15 years

2  Share options granted to key management: 2007 – 100,000 share options; 2008 – 260,000 share options; 2009 - 73,334 share options; 2011- 3,225,000 share options (ESOP No. 2); 

2012 – 450,000 share options; 2013 – 150,000 share options.

3  Vesting conditions - On November 25, 2008 the Company’s general shareholders meeting and the Board of Directors approved modifi cation of ESOP1. The amendment plan determined 

that all options that were not vested on October 25, 2008 (“record date”) shall vest over a new three-year period commencing on the record date, in such way that each year following that 

date one third of such options shall be vested. The number of options which were modifi ed under the amendment was 28,182,589.

On exercise date the Company shall allot, in respect of each option so exercised, shares equal to the difference between (A) the opening price of the Company’s 
shares on the LSE (or WSE under certain conditions) on the exercise date, provided that if the opening price exceeds GBP 3.24, the opening price shall be set at 
GBP 3.24 (Except 2nd ESOP as stated above); less (B) the Exercise Price of the Options; and such difference (A minus B) will be divided by the opening price of 
the Company’s Shares on the LSE (or WSE under certain conditions) on the exercise date:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year 

Exercised during the year 

Forfeited during the period - back to pool 

Granted during the year 

Outstanding at the end of the year 

Exercisable at the end of the year 

Weighted average 

exercise price* 2013 

GBP 

0.43 

- 

0.45 

0.29 

0.43 

Number of  

Weighted average 

exercise price* 2012 

GBP 

0.46 

0.42 

0.96 

0.47 

0.43 

options 

2013 

24,997,557 

- 

(1,586,419) 

1,650,000 

25,061,138 

21,070,033 

Number of 

options
2012 

26,905,132

(108,335)

(2,989,240)

1,190,000

24,997,557

20,176,650 

 *  The options outstanding at 31 December 2013 have an exercise price in the range of GBP 0.28 to GBP 0.54 (app. EUR 0.34 - EUR 0.65), and have weighted average remaining contractual 

life of 8.16 years. The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised in 2012 was GBP 0.48.

118

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 25

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Following the modifi cations of the option plan, the maximum number of shares issuable upon exercise of all outstanding options as of the end of the reporting 
period is 34,722,528.    

The estimated fair value of the services received is measured based on a binomial lattice model using the following assumptions: 

Key management  

Key management  

Employees 

Employees

personnel 2013 

personnel 2012* 

€’000 

€’000 

2013 

€’000 

22,849 

0.28 

131,368 

183,403 

0.52 

0.29 

2012*

€’000

144,017

0.46

49.36%-49.85% 

47.69%-59.8% 

46.74%-49.9% 

39.75%-59.8%

0.28 

2 

- 

0.50 

2 

- 

0.3 

1.5 

- 

0.46

1.5

-

Fair value of share options and assumptions 

Fair value at measurement date  (in EUR)* 

Weighted average Exercise price 

Expected volatility  

Weighted average share price (Gbp) 

Suboptimal exercise multiple 

Expected dividends  

Risk-free interest rate 

(based on the yield rates of the non indexed 

linked UK treasury bonds) 

0.33%-4.42% 

0.31%-3.06% 

0.18%-4.42% 

0.24%-4.13%

 *  Not including information in respect of the amendment of the 1st ESOP.

During 2013 the total employee costs for the share options granted was EUR 424 thousands (2012 - EUR 1,419 thousands).

Due to low trading volumes, there is not enough information concerning Plaza share price. Therefore, in order to derive the expected stock price volatility, analysis 
was performed based on the data of Plaza, and of three other companies operating in the similar segment, which have similar market capital and are traded at the 
Warsaw Stock Exchange. In an attempt to estimate the expected volatility, fi rst calculation of the short-term standard deviation (standard deviation of company’s 
share during one year as of the options’ Grant Date) has been done. In the next stage, calculation of the long-term standard deviation (standard deviation for the 
period starting one year prior to the Grant Date for the remaining period of the plan) has been done, where the weight of the standard deviation for the Company 
was ranging between 45% -65% and the weight of the average of standard deviations of comparative companies was 35% – 55% (2012: the same)The working 
assumption is that the standard deviation of the underlying asset yield converges in the long-term with the multi-year average.

PCI and EPI Share Option plans 

On March 14, 2011 (“Date of grant”) the Company’s direct subsidiaries PCI and EPI (“Companies”) granted non-negotiable options, exercisable into the 
Companies’ ordinary shares, to employees, directors and offi cers of the Companies and/or affi liates of the Companies.  The options were granted for no 
consideration and have 3 years of vesting with contractual life of 7 years following the date of grant of such options. PCI had granted 14,212 share options with 
exercise price of EUR 227 per option. EPI had granted 51,053 share options with exercise price of EUR 0.01 per option.  PCI and EPI common shares valuation 
methodology was based on NAV Model.  The expected stock price volatility was based on 5 Indian publicly traded real estate companies and set to range 
43.31%-54.4%. The annual risk free interest rate range was: 1.25% -4.03%. The suboptimal exercise multiple for key management personnel were set to 2 and 
for employees 1.5 in 2011.  The Option Plans include, among others, a Cashless Exercise mechanism prior to/following IPO and conversion upon the listing of a 
subsidiary.

The total number of Underlying Shares reserved for issuance under PCI Plan and EPI Plan and any modifi cation thereof shall be 14,697 Underlying Shares and 
52,600 Underlying Shares, respectively (representing approximately 5% of the share capital of the Companies on a fully diluted basis, inclusive of all Underlying 
Shares).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 26 - RENTAL INCOME

a. Continuing operations (rental)

Rental income from operating shopping centers presented as Trading properties1 

Other rental income2 

Total 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

22,480 

1,198 

23,678 

21,742

1,370

23,112

 *  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  As of the end of 2013 and 2012, there are six operating shopping centers presented as part of trading properties. 

2  Composed mainly from rental income generated by the Investment property Prague 3 (disposed in July 2013, refer to note 34(E)) in the amount of EUR 0.7 million (2012 – EUR 1.3 

million). The rest of the rental income is attributed to small scale rental fees charged on plots held by the Group.

b. Continuing operations (entertainment centers)

Revenue from operation of entertainment centers is attributed to a subsidiary of the Company trading as “Fantasy Park” which provides gaming and entertainment 
services in operating shopping centers. As of December 31, 2013, these subsidiaries operate in four shopping centers (December 31, 2012 – in 13 shopping 
centers). Regarding the settlement reached in respect of legal claims against Fantasy Park refer to note 34(M). Following the settlement reached, seven of Fantasy 
Park operation centers were closed.

Discontinued operation - For comparative revenues generated from discontinued operation, refer to note 37.

NOTE 27 - COST OF OPERATIONS

a. Continuing operations (cost of operations)

Active shopping centers presented as Trading properties1 

Other cost of operations2 

Total 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

8,187 

1,221 

9,408 

7,994

1,390

9,384

 *  Restated mainly due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.  Additional reclassifi cation of EUR 3.5 million of mainly 

marketing costs into cost of operations from administrative expenses was performed in order to better refl ect the Net Operating Income (NOI) of the operating shopping centers and 

entertainment activities in the gross profi t line item.

1  Refer to note 26 (1) above.

2  Composed mainly from costs generated by the Investment property Prague 3 (disposed in July 2013, refer to note 34(E)) in the amount of EUR 0.3 million (2012 – EUR 0.5 million). The 

rest of the cost is attributed to small scale costs on plots held by the Group.

120

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 26 / note 27 / note 28

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

b. Continuing operations (entertainment centers)

Refer also to note 26 (b) above. The costs are inclusive of management of the operation of the entertainment centers, as well as utility, rent and spent material 
associated with the operation of the entertainment centers.

Discontinued operation – For comparative costs relating to discontinued operations, refer to note 37.

NOTE 28 - ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS

a. Administrative expenses, excluding restructuring costs

Salaries and related expenses  

Professional services  

Offi ces and offi ce rent 

Travelling and accommodation 

Depreciation and amortization 

Others 

Total 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

4,522 

3,743 

445 

180 

382 

163 

9,435 

5,242

3,734

707

702

610

437

11,432

 *  Restated mainly due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.  Additional reclassifi cation of EUR 3.5 million of administrative 

expenses (of mainly marketing costs) into cost of operations was performed in order to better refl ect the operation performance of active shopping centers and entertainment activities.

b. Restructuring costs

The Company incurred restructuring cost as a result of the restructuring process (refer to note 34 (A)).

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

121

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 29 - OTHER INCOME AND OTHER EXPENSES

Gain from selling property and equipment 

Income from insurance company (refer to note 10) 

Change in fair value of investment property1 

Other income  

Total other income 

Impairment of property and equipment2 

Impairment of Kochi advance (refer to note 10) 

Impairments of other assets3 

Change in fair value of investment property1 

Other expenses 

Total other expenses 

Other income (expense), net 

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  Refer to note 13.

2  Refer to note 12.

3  Mainly due to assets associated with trading property assets in Romania (Târgu Mures¸ and BAS). 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

23 

- 

- 

390 

413 

- 

(4,321) 

(2,548) 

(4,267) 

(332) 

11,468 

(11,055) 

19

7,611

837

503

8,970

(450)

-

-

-

(672)

(1,122)

7,848

122

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 29 / note 30 / note 31

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 30 - NET FINANCE INCOME (COSTS)

Recognized in profi t or loss 

Foreign exchange losses on bank deposits, bank loans 

Gain from bonds buyback programme 

Interest income on bank deposits  

Finance income from available for sale fi nancial assets 

Interest income on structured deposits 

Finance income from hedging activities through writing options 

Changes in fair value of derivatives 

Interest from loans to related parties 

Finance income 

Interest expense on debentures (including CPI)  

Interest expense on bank loans  
Changes of fair value in debentures measured at fair value through profi t or loss1 
Loss from reissuance of bonds 

Interest expenses on loans on structures 

Finance costs from hedging activities through sale of options 

Foreign exchange losses on debentures 

Loss from available for sale fi nancial assets sold 

Changes in fair value of structured deposit  

Foreign exchange losses on bank deposits, bank loans 

Cost of raising loans amortized to profi t or loss 

Other fi nance expenses 

Subtotal 
Less- borrowing costs capitalized to trading properties under development 

Finance costs 

Net fi nance costs 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

17 
- 
119 
956 
- 
- 
93 
103 

1,288 

(9,580) 
(10,732) 
(13,185) 
(5,707) 
- 
(2,364) 
(5,352) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(242) 

(47,162) 
6,530 

(40,632) 

(39,344) 

-

4,333

1,025

712

2,085

11,683

199

321

20,358

(19,135)

(12,452)

(19,032)

-

(497)

-

(2,033)

(1,222)

(45)

(1,091)

(676)

(439)

(56,622)

19,091

(37,531)

(17,173)

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  The change in fair value includes a total of EUR 4 million (2012 – EUR 2.8 million) attributable to the credit risk of the Company.

NOTE 31 - TAXES 

Tax recognized in profi t or loss 

Current year  

Deferred tax benefi t (refer to note 22) 

Total 

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

295 
(6,551) 

(6,256) 

297

(6,889)

(6,592)

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

123

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Deferred tax expense (tax benefi t)

Origination and reversal of temporary differences 

Recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses 

Total 

Reconciliation of effective tax rate 

Dutch statutory income tax rate 

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes 

Tax at the Dutch statutory income tax rate 

Recognition of previously unrecognized tax losses  

Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions 

Current year tax loss for which no deferred tax asset is provided1 

Non-deductible expenses  

Tax Expense (Tax benefi t) 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

(6,551) 

- 

(6,551) 

(4,368)

(2,521)

(6,889)

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

% 

€’000 

Restated* €’000

25% 

25% 

(224,394) 

(56,098) 

- 

19,607 

26,854 

3,381 

(6,256) 

25%

(90,711)

(22,678)

(2,521)

5,169

13,395

43

(6,592)

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

1  2012 – Mainly due to impairments not recognized for tax purposes.

The main tax laws imposed on the Group companies in their countries of residence:

The Netherlands

a.  Companies resident in the Netherlands are subject to corporate income tax at the general rate of 25%.  The fi rst EUR 200,000 of profi ts is taxed at a rate of 

20%. Tax losses may be carried back for one year and carried forward for nine years.   As part of the measures to combat the consequences of the economic 
crisis, taxpayers can elect for an extension of the loss carry back period to three years (instead of one year). The election is only available for losses suffered in 
the taxable years 2009, 2010 and 2011. If a taxpayer makes use of the election, two additional limitations apply: (i) the loss carry forward period for the taxable 
years 2009, 2010 and/or 2011 will be limited to a maximum of six years (instead of nine years); and (ii) the maximum amount of loss that can be carried 
back to the second and third year preceding the taxable year will be limited to EUR 10 million per year. The amount of loss that can be carried back to the year 
directly preceding the taxable year for which the election is made will remain unrestricted. As of the taxable year 2012, the election for extended loss carry 
back is not available anymore and the regular loss carry back and carry forward limitations apply.   

b.  Under the participation exemption rules, income (including dividends and capital gains) derived by Netherlands companies in respect of qualifying investments 
in the nominal paid up share capital of resident or non-resident investee companies, is exempt from Netherlands corporate income tax provided the conditions 
as set under these rules have been satisfi ed. Such conditions require, among others, a minimum percentage ownership interest in the investee company and 
require the investee company to satisfy at least one of the following tests:

-   Motive Test, the investee company is not held as passive investment;

-   Tax Test, the investee company is taxed locally at an effective rate of at least 10% (calculated based on Dutch tax accounting standards);

-   Asset Test, the investee company owns (directly and indirectly) less than 50% low taxed passive assets.

124

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 31

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

India 

The corporate income tax rate applicable to the taxable income of an Indian Company is 32.445% (including surcharge of 5% and cess of 3%) or 33.99% 
(including surcharge of 10% and rate of 3%.  Surcharge of 5% is applicable if the total income exceeds INR 10 million (EUR 0.12 million) but is less than INR 
100 million (EUR 1.2 million) and 10% if the total income exceeds INR 100 million). Minimum alternate tax (MAT) of 20.01% (including surcharge of 5% and 
cess of 3%) or 20.96% (including surcharge of 10% and cess of 3%) would apply on the taxable book profi ts of a company. Taxable book profi ts are computed in 
accordance with relevant provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act. The fi nal tax payable is the higher of the MAT liability or corporate income tax payable.  If taxes 
are paid under MAT, then credit to the extent of MAT paid over corporate income tax is available (MAT credit). MAT Credit can be availed, if the company has future 
taxable profi ts in the following ten years and credit to the extent of difference of the MAT payable and corporate income tax payable of the Company is allowed.  

Capital gains on transfer of capital assets (on which tax depreciation has not been claimed) are taxed at the rate of 21.63% (Including surcharge of 5% and rate 
of 3%) or 22.66% (including surcharge of 10% and cess of 3%), provided that the capital assets were held for more than 36 months immediately preceding the 
date of the transfer or 32.445% (including surcharge of 5% and cess of 3%) or 33.99% (including surcharge of 10% and of 3 if they were held for less than 36 
months (in case of capital asset being shares held in a company or any security listed on a stock exchange in India or unit of the Unit Trust of India or a Unit of 
Mutual fund or Zero Coupon Bonds, a period of 12 months is considered).  Dividends paid out of the profi ts are subject to Dividend Distribution Tax at the rate of 
16.995% (including surcharge of 10% and rate of 3%) There is no withholding tax on dividends distributed by an Indian company and no additional taxes need to 
be paid by the shareholder. Business losses can be offset against profi ts and gains on any business or profession for a period of eight years from the incurrence 
year’s end. There is no limit for carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation. 

India-Cyprus treaty issue 

India has a Tax Treaty with Cyprus and under the Indian domestic tax laws, a resident of Cyprus would be eligible to claim recourse to the provisions of the 
India-Cyprus Tax Treaty to the extent the provisions of the Tax Treaty are more benefi cial than those of the Indian domestic tax laws.  The India-Cyprus Tax Treaty 
contains more benefi cial provisions in respect of taxation of interest, capital gains etc.  However, with effect from 1 November 2013, Cyprus has been notifi ed as 
a Notifi ed Jurisdictional Area (“NJA”) under the Indian domestic tax laws due to lack of effective exchange of information with Cyprus.  The notifi cation of Cyprus 
as an NJA is an anti tax-avoidance measure and provides for onerous tax consequences in respect of transactions with Cypriot entities.  The consequences of 
entering into transactions with Cypriot entities in light of the NJA provisions are:

• 

If a taxpayer enters into a transaction with a person in Cyprus, then all the parties to the transaction shall be treated as Associated Enterprises (“AE”) and 
the transaction shall be treated as an international transaction resulting in application of transfer-pricing provisions contained in the Indian domestic tax law 
including maintenance of prescribed documentation; 

•  No deduction in respect of any payment made to any fi nancial institution in Cyprus shall be allowed unless the taxpayer furnishes an authorization allowing for 

seeking relevant information from the said fi nancial institution; 

•  No deduction in respect of any other expenditure or allowance arising from the transaction with a person located in Cyprus shall be allowed unless the taxpayer 

maintains and furnishes the prescribed information; 

• 

If any sum is received from a person located in Cyprus, then the onus is on the taxpayer to satisfactorily explain the source of such money in the hands of such 
person or in the hands of the benefi cial owner, and in case of his failure to do so, the amount shall be deemed to be the income of the taxpayer; 

Any payment made to a person located in Cyprus shall be liable for withholding tax at the highest of the following rates - (a) rates prescribed in the domestic tax 
laws (b) rates prescribed in the Tax Treaty (c) 30 per cent.

Despite the above, the Company does not expect the above to have a material effect on its business in India, as no additional material equity injections in India is 
expected, and that disposal of assets is expected (if any) on an Indian level rather than on a Cypriot level.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

125

 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 32 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview 

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of fi nancial instruments:

•  Credit risk
•  Liquidity risk
•  Market risk

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing 
risk, and the Group’s management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included in note 34(A).

The Board of Directors has established a continuous process for identifying and managing the risks faced by the Group (on a consolidated basis), and confi rms 
that it is responsible to take appropriate actions to address any weaknesses identifi ed.

The Group’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to moni-
tor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to refl ect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities. 

The Company’s Audit Committee oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures and reviews the 
adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group. 

a. Credit risk 

Credit risk is the risk of fi nancial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a fi nancial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises 
principally from the Group’s fi nancial instruments held in banks and from other receivables.

Management has a credit policy in place and the exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit evaluations are performed on all customers 
requiring credit over a certain amount. The Group requires collateral in the form of mainly deposit equal to three months of rent from tenants of shopping centers 
(collected deposits from tenants totalled EUR 2.6 million as at both December 31, 2013 and 2012). 

Cash and deposits and other fi nancial assets

The Group limits its exposure to credit risk in respect to cash and deposits, including held for sale fi nancial assets (debt instruments) by investing mostly in 
deposits and other fi nancial instruments with counterparties that have a credit rating of at least investment grade from international rating agencies. Given these 
credit ratings, management does not expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations.

b. Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its fi nancial obligations as they fall due. The Group encountered severe liquidity crisis during the 
last months of 2013. It suspended all payments to its debt holders in November 2013 and sought for credit protection from the Dutch Court. Refer to note 34(A) 
for more details. 

c. Market risk 

Currency risk

Currency risk is the risk that the Group will incur signifi cant fl uctuations in its profi t or loss as a result of utilizing currencies other than the functional currency of 
the respective Group company. 

The Group is exposed to currency risk mainly on borrowings (debentures issued in Israel and in Poland) that are denominated in a currency other than the 
functional currency of the respective Group companies. The currencies in which these transactions primarily are denominated are the NIS or PLN.  Regarding 
currency and risk hedging of the debentures refer also to note 15.  The company did not engage in hedging transactions in order to mitigate its currency risk 
exposure, starting the second half of 2013.

126

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 32

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Interest Rate Risk (including infl ation)

The group’s interest rate risk arises mainly from short and long-term borrowing (as well as debentures). Borrowings issued at variable interest rate expose the 
Group to variability in cash fl ows. Borrowings issued at fi xed interest rate (but are presented at their fair value) expose the Group to changes in fair value, if the 
interest is changing. In certain case, the Group uses IRS to minimize the exposure to interest risk by fi xing the interest rate.  Regarding interest rate risk hedging 
of the debentures and bank facilities, refer to note 14. As the Israeli infl ation risk is diminishing to a level that management believes is acceptable (Israeli CPI 2013 
1.9%; 2012 1.4%), the Company has stopped using cross currency SWAP instruments in 2012.

Shareholders’ equity management

Refer to note 34 (A) in respect of shareholders equity components in the restructuring plan.  The Company’s Board of Directors is updated on an ongoing basis on 
the progress of the restructuring process, to assure (among other things) that any changes in the shareholders equity (due to issuance of shares, options or any 
other equity instrument) is to the benefi t of both the Company’s bondholders and shareholders.

Credit risk

The carrying amount of fi nancial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The vast majority of fi nancial assets are not passed due, and the management 
believes that the unimpaired amounts that are past due by more than 30 days are still collectible in full, based on historic payment behavior and extensive analysis 
of customer credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

Cash and cash equivalents 

Restricted bank deposits – short-term 

Held for trading fi nancial assets 

Available for sale debt securities 

Trade receivables, net 

Other receivables 

Loan to Diksna 

Restricted bank deposits – long-term 

Total 

Note 

Credit quality 

€’000 

 Restated* €’000

Carrying amount as   

Carrying amount as

at December 31, 2013 

at December 31, 2012

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

14 

Mainly Baa3 

Mainly BBB+ 

Mostly BB+ 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

26,157 

6,319 

1,246 

- 

3,372 

4,871 

7,039 

181 

49,185 

35,374

18,759

-

11,714

3,399

11,492

6,949

779

88,466

 *  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, all debtors without credit quality have a relationship of less than fi ve years with the Group.  At 31 December 2013, the ageing 
of trade and other receivables that were not impaired was as follows:

Neither past due nor impaired 

Past due 1–90 days 

Past due 91–120 days 

Total 

Carrying amount  

Carrying amount

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

4,443 

3,372 

428 

8,243 

10,212

3,399

1,280

14,891

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

127

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

The maximum exposure to credit risk for the abovementioned table at the reporting date by type of debtor was as follows:

Banks and fi nancial institutions 

Tenants 

Governmental and insurance institutions 

Loan to Diksna 

Receivable due to selling equity accounted investee 

Related parties and other 

Total 

Carrying amount  

Carrying amount 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

Restated* €’000

33,903 

3,372 

1,877 

7,039 

2,350 

644 

49,185 

66,958

3,399

9,829

6,949

-

1,331

88,466

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

Liquidity risk (refer also to note 34(A)) 

The following are the contractual maturities of fi nancial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:

December 31, 2013* 

Derivative fi nancial liabilities 

IRS Derivatives 

Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities 

Secured bank loans  

Unsecured debentures issued 

Trade and other fi nancial payables 

Related parties 

Carrying 

amount 

910 

175,338 

168,619 

13,651 

944 

Contractual 

cash fl ows 

6 months

or less

(946) 

(946)

(179,402) 

(207,452) 

(13,651) 

(944) 

(179,402)

(207,452)

(13,651)

(944)

Total 

358,552 

(401,449) 

(401,449)

*  In view of the restructuring procedure and the default in bond payments which triggered a cross default on all other loan facilities within the Group, all loan facilities are currently payable 

on demand, triggering also repayments of trade and other payables, and therefore are reclassifi ed as to be paid within six months from the end of the reporting period. The restructuring 

plan does not provide any protection from the banks rights to demand early repayment, including exercising the collateral, of loans provided to the Groups’ entities. As of the date of 

approval of these consolidated fi nancial statements, there were no early repayment requests by any of the fi nancing banks.

December 31, 2012 Restated* 

amount 

cash fl ows 

or less 

months 

Carrying  Contractual 

6 months 

6-12 

1-2 

years 

2-5 

More than

years 

5 years

Derivative fi nancial liabilities 

IRS Derivatives 

Non-derivative fi nancial liabilities 

Secured bank loans   

Unsecured debentures issued  

Trade and other payables 

Related parties 

3,320 

(3,483) 

(1,023) 

(1,023) 

(986) 

(452) 

211,750 

(261,423) 

(16,459) 

189,341 

(255,706) 

15,402 

(15,554) 

546 

(546) 

- 

(361) 

- 

(23,308) 

(90,688) 

(9,377) 

(546) 

(36,925) 

(71,098) 

(1,380) 

- 

(87,030) 

(93,920) 

(4,436) 

- 

(97,702)

-

-

-

Total 

420,359 

(533,229) 

(16,820) 

(123,919) 

(109,403) 

(185,386) 

(97,702)

*  Restated due to Retrospective application – refer to note 3 regarding initial application of the new suite of standards.

128

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 32

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Currency risk

The Company’s main currency risk is in respect of its NIS denominated debentures. Following the discontinuance and full settlement of all currency options 
effective July 2013, the Company is exposed to changes in EUR/NIS rate.    

The following exchange rate of EUR/NIS applied during the year:

EUR 

NIS 1 

Average rate 

Average rate 

2013 

0.208 

2012 

0.202 

Reporting date 

Reporting date

Spot rate 

2013 

Spot rate
2012 

0.209 

0.203 

PLN denominated debentures - A change of 6 percent in EUR/PLN rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) profi t or loss by EUR 0.9 million, 
as a result of holding PLN linked bonds.

NIS denominated debentures - A change of 11 percent in EUR/NIS (2012 – 10 percent) rates at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss 
by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. 

For the year ended 

December 31, 

2013 

2012 

Interest rate risk

Profi le

Profi t or loss effect 

Profi t or loss effect

Carrying 

amount of 

debentures 

154,151 

174,663 

NIS 

strengthening  

effect 

(16,957) 

(17,466) 

NIS 

devaluation

effect

16,957

17,466

As of the reporting date the interest rate profi le of the Group’s interest-bearing fi nancial instruments was:

Fixed rate instruments 

Financial assets 

Financial liabilities 

Total 

Variable rate instruments 

Financial assets 

Debentures 

Other fi nancial liabilities 

Total 

Carrying amount  

2013 

€’000 

Carrying amount 

2012 Restated* 

€’000

30,951 

(21,710) 

9,241 

- 

(168,619) 

(153,628) 

39,640

(33,930)

5,710

-

(189,341)

(178,005)

(322,247) 

(367,346) 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

129

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Cash fl ow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments

A change of 5 basis points in EURIBOR interest rates (2012 – 30 basis points) at the reporting date would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the 
amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same 
basis for 2012.

Variable Interest rate effect (excluding debentures) 

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012 

NIS Debentures 

Profi t or Loss  

Increase 

Profi t or Loss

Decrease

(77) 

(533) 

77

533

Sensitivity analysis – effect of changes in Israeli CPI on carrying amount of NIS debentures

A change of 3 percent in Israeli Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) at the reporting date (and in 2012) would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the amounts 
shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.

For the year ended 

December 31, 

2013 

2012 

Carrying 

amount of 

debentures 

154,151 

174,663 

Profi t or loss effect 

Profi t or loss effect

CPI 

increase   

effect 

(4,625) 

(5,240) 

CPI 

increase 

effect

4,625

5,240

Sensitivity analysis – effect of changes in NIS basic Interest on carrying amount of NIS debentures

A change of 1 percent in Israeli basic interest rate at the reporting date (and on 2012) would have increased (decreased) profi t or loss by the amounts shown 
below. The analysis relates only to debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss, as there is no effect on carrying amount of debentures presented at 
amortized cost. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant.

For the year ended 

December 31, 

2013 

2012 

Fair values

Carrying 

amount of 

debentures 

97,983 

116,147 

Profi t or loss effect 

Profi t or loss effect

Interest  

increase    

effect 

(1,104) 

(1,510) 

Interest 

decrease  

effect

1,136

1,553

Fair values measurement versus carrying amounts 

In respect to the Company’s fi nancial assets instruments not presented at fair value, being mostly short-term market interest bearing liquid balances, the Company 
believes that the carrying amount approximates fair value.

In respect the Company’s fi nancial instruments liabilities:

For the Israeli debentures presented at amortized cost, a good approximation of the fair value would be the market quote of the relevant debenture, had they been 
measured at fair value.

130

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 32

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Debentures at amortized cost – polish bonds 
Debentures A at amortized cost – Israeli bonds 
Debentures B at amortized cost – Israeli bonds 

Carrying 
amount 
2013 

14,468 
13,765 
42,403 

Carrying 
amount 
2012 

14,678 
- 
58,603 

Fair 
value 
2013 

14,468 
10,393 
33,507 

Fair
value
2012 

14,678
-
41,599

In respect of most of other non-listed borrowings, the Group was not asked to raise interest rates or to bring forward maturities as a result of the restructuring 
procedure, as most fi nancing banks does not expect the restructuring procedure to have a material effect on the security the banks hold under non-recourse 
loans, and therefore the Company has a basis to believe that the fair value of non-listed borrowings approximates the carrying amount. 

Refer to notes 20 and 21 in respect of comparison between fair value and amortized cost of debentures presented at fair value through profi t or loss.

Fair value Hierarchy

The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy. It does 
not include fair value information for fi nancial assets and fi nancial liabilities not measured at fair value if the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair 
value:

Financial assets not measured at fair value 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Restricted bank deposits – short-term 
Held for trading fi nancial assets 
Available for sale debt securities 
Trade receivables, net 
Other receivables 
Loan to Diksna 
Restricted bank deposits – long-term 

Total 

Financial liabilities not measured at fair value 
Interest bearing loans from banks 
Debentures at amortized cost 
Trade and other payables 
Related parties 

Total 

Financial liabilities measured at fair value 
Debentures at fair value through profi t or loss 
Derivatives 

Total 

Note 

6 
7 

8 
9 
10a 
14 

Note 

16 
21 

18 

Note 

20 
15 

Fair value 
hierarchy 

Carrying amount as   

at December 31, 2013 
€’000 

Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

Level 2 

26,157 
6,319 
1,246 
- 
3,372 
4,871 
7,039 
181 

49,185 

35,374
18,759
-
11,714
3,399
11,492
6,949
779

88,466

Fair value 
hierarchy 

Carrying amount as   

at December 31, 2013 
€’000 

Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

Level 2 
Level 1 

175,338 
70,636 
13,651 
944 

260,569 

205,977
73,194
15,217
546

294,934

Fair value 
hierarchy 

Carrying amount as   

at December 31, 2013 
€’000 

Carrying amount as
at December 31, 2012
 Restated* €’000

Level 1 
Level 2 

97,983 
910 

98,893 

116,147
3,320

119,467

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

131

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 33 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS 

a. Contingent liabilities and commitments to related parties

1.  The Company and/or its subsidiaries were parties to Projects Initiation and Supervision Agreement which was signed in 2006 between the Company and 

Control Centers Ltd. (“Control Centers”).

Control Centers is a private company controlled by Mr Zisser, the former controlling shareholder of the Company. Europe-Israel (M.M.S.) Ltd. (“Europe-
Israel”) is an Israeli corporation wholly-owned by Control Centers (which in turn, is controlled by Mr Zisser). 

Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the “Bank”) has instituted legal action to foreclose on its pledges, including, inter alia, all the assets of Europe-Israel securing Europe-
Israel’s obligations under a loan agreement with the Bank, including its shares in EI. 

  On July 21, 2013 a receiver was appointed to Control Centers Ltd. and Europe-Israel and on September 10, 2010 the Receiver had dismissed their 

employees. Consequently, as of the date hereof the Company is not receiving the Services under the aforementioned agreement. 

At December 31, 2013 the fi nancial statements does not include any liability in respect of engineering supervision services supplied by related parties in 
Control Centers Group. For the total charges in 2013 and 2012 refer to note 35).

2.  On October 27, 2006 the Company and Mr Zisser, an Executive Director of the Company, entered into a service agreement, pursuant to which he will 

be entitled to a monthly salary of USD 25 thousand (EUR 19 thousand) which includes pension, retirement and similar benefi ts for his services as the 
Company’s Executive Director. 

3.  In October 2006, the Company and EI entered into an agreement, pursuant to which with effect from 1 January 2006 the Company will pay commissions 

to EI in respect of all and any outstanding corporate and fi rst demand guarantees which have been issued by EI in favour of the Company up to 0.5% of the 
amount or value of the guarantee, per annum. As of the end of the reporting period the Group has no outstanding guarantees from EI and no consideration 
was paid in this respect.

4.  On October 13, 2006, EI entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Company, under which EI is obliged to offer to the Company potential real 
estate development sites sourced by it in India. Under the agreement, EI is obliged to offer the Company the exclusive right to develop all of the shopping 
center projects which EI acquires during the 15-year term of the Agreement. The Agreement was terminated upon the signing of the joint venture in India 
(refer to note 34), but both EI and the Company agreed that upon the termination of the Joint Venture agreement they will re-execute the Agreement. 

5.  On November 25, 2007 the Company entered into an indemnity agreement with all of the Company’s directors and on June 20, 2011 with part of the 
Company’s senior management – the maximum indemnifi cation amount to be granted by the Company to the directors shall not exceed 25% of the 
shareholders’ equity of the Company based on the shareholders’ equity set forth in the Company’s last consolidated fi nancial statements prior to such 
payment.  No consideration was paid by the Company in this respect since the agreement was signed.   

b.  Contingent liabilities and Commitments to others

1.  Tesco 

The Company is liable to the buyer of its previously owned shopping center in the Czech Republic (“NOVO”) – sold in June 2006 – in respect to one of its 
tenants (“Tesco”). Tesco leased an area within the shopping center for a period of 30 years, with an option to extend the lease period for an additional 30 
years, in consideration for EUR 6.9 million which was paid in advance. According to the lease agreement, the tenant has the right to terminate the lease 
agreement subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions as stipulated in the agreement. The Company’s management believes that it is not probable that this 
commitment will result in any material amount being paid by the Company. 

2.   General commitments and warranties in respect of trading property and investment property disposals.

      In the framework of the transactions for the sale of the Group’s real estate assets, the Group has undertaken to indemnify the respective purchasers for any 
losses and costs incurred in connection with the sale transactions. The indemnifi cations usually include: (i) Indemnifi cations in respect of completeness of 
title on the assets and/or the shares sold (i.e that the assets and/or the shares sold are owned by the Group and are clean from any encumbrances and/or 
mortgage and the like). Such indemnifi cations generally survived indefi nitely and are capped to the purchase price in each respective transaction; and (ii) 
Indemnifi cations in respect of other representation and warranties included in the sales agreements (such as: development of the project, responsibility to 

132

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 33

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

defects in the development project, tax matter and others). Such indemnifi cations are limited in time (generally 3 years from signing a closing agreement) 
and are generally capped to 25% to 50% of the purchase price. No indemnifi cations were provided by the Group till the date of the statement of fi nancial 
position.

      The tax authorities have challenged the applied tax treatment in two of the entities previously sold in Hungary by the Company to Klépierre in the course of 
the Framework Agreement dated 30 July, 2004 (“Framework Agreement”). In respect of two of the former subsidiaries of the Company, the tax authorities 
decision of reducing the tax base by and imposed a penalty in the sum of HUF 428.5 million (circa EUR 1.4 million), were challenged by the previously held 
entities at the competent courts. Klépierre has submitted an indemnifi cation request claiming that the tax assessed in the described procedures falls into 
the scope of the Framework Agreement tax indemnifi cation provisions and the Company in its respond rejected such claims.

      The Company management estimates that no signifi cant costs will be borne thereby, in respect of these indemnifi cations.

3.  The Company is retaining a 100% holding in all its projects in Serbia after it was decided to discontinue the negotiations with a Serbian developer. The 

Company has a contingent obligation to pay the developer in any case there is major progress in the projects. The total remaining potential obligation is 
EUR 0.9 million. 

4.  Apart from point 3 above, the Company does not have any contractual commitments in respect of construction activities.

c.   Contingent liabilities due to legal proceedings

The Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. Although the fi nal outcome of each of these cases cannot be estimated at 
this time, the Company’s management believes, that the chances these litigations will result in any outfl ow of resources to settle them is remote, and therefore 
no provision or disclosure is required. 

d.  Securities, guarantees and liens under bank fi nance agreements 

1.  Certain companies within the Group which are engaged in the purchase, construction or operation of shopping centers (“Project Companies”) have secured 
their respective credit facilities (with withdrawn facility amounts totalling EUR 173 million, as of December 31, 2013) awarded by fi nancing banks (for 
projects in Poland, Czech Republic, India and Serbia), by providing fi rst or second ranking (fi xed or fl oating) charges on property owned thereby, including 
right in and to real estate property as well as the fi nanced projects, on rights pertaining to certain contracts (including lease, operation and management 
agreements), on rights arising from insurance policies, and the like.  Shares of certain Project Companies were also pledged in favour of the fi nancing 
banks.

      In respect of corporate guarantee for the fulfi lment of its subsidiaries obligations and joint ventures under loan agreements, refer to note 16 and note 14, 

respectively. 

      Shareholders loans as well as any other rights and/or interests of shareholders in and to the Project Companies were subordinated to the respective credit 

facilities. 

      Payment to the shareholders is permitted (including the distribution of dividends but excluding management fees) subject to fulfi lling certain preconditions.

      Certain loan agreements include an undertaking to fulfi l certain fi nancial and operational covenants throughout the duration of the credit, namely: 

complying with “a minimum debt services cover ratio”, “loan outstanding amount” to secured assets value ratio; complying with certain restrictions 
on interest rates; maintaining certain cash balances for current operations; maintaining equity to project cost ratio and net profi t to current bank’s debt; 
occupancy percentage and others.  In respect of breach of covenants, refer to note 16.

      The Project Companies undertook not to make any disposition in and to the secured assets, not to sell, transfer or lease any substantial part of their assets 

without the prior consent of the fi nancing bank. 

In certain events the Project Companies undertook not to allow, without the prior consent of the fi nancing bank: 

(i)  any changes in and to the holding structure of the Project Companies nor to allow for any change in their incorporation documents;
(ii) execution of any signifi cant activities, including issuance of shares, related party transactions and signifi cant transactions not in the ordinary course of 

business; 

(iii) certain changes to the scope of the project; 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

133

 
    
    
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

(iv) the assumption of certain liabilities by the Project Companies in favour of third parties; 
(v) receipt of loans by the Project Companies and/or the provision thereby of a guarantee to third parties; and the like. 

2.  Commitment in respect of derivative transaction

  Within the framework of three IRS transactions (refer to note 14), executed between the Group and commercial banks (the “Banks”), the Group agreed to 

provide the Banks with cash or another collateral.

     Accordingly, as of the end of the reporting period, the Company has pledged, a security deposit in the amount of EUR 0.3 million in respect of the 

Kragujevac IRS transaction. In respect of the Suwałki IRS the project company also established a bail mortgage up to EUR 4 million encumbering the real 
estate project.  In respect of Torun´ IRS the project company also established a bail mortgage up to EUR 5.4 million encumbering the real estate project.  

3.  Commitment in respect of Bonds raised in Poland.

  Under the offering memorandum for the issuance of Polish bonds, certain circumstances shall be deemed events of default giving the bondholders the 

right to demand Early Redemption, which includes among others the following covenants:

a)  Breach of the Cash Position as a result of the payment of dividend or the shares  buy-back programme – if at any time during a period of 90 days from 

the payment of dividend, or the acquisition of its own shares, the Cash Position falls below EUR 50 million;

b)  Breach of fi nancial ratios – occurs if the Net Capitalization Ratio exceeds 70%; Net Capitalization Ratio (“the Ratio”) is the Net Debt divided by the 

Equity plus the Net Debt, as calculated by the Group’s auditor; “Net Debt” mean the Group’s total debt under: loans and borrowings, lease agreements, 
bonds, other debt securities and other interest bearing or discounted fi nancial instruments in issue, less related hedge derivatives, cash and cash 
equivalents, short and long-term interest bearing deposits with banks or other fi nancial institutions, available for sale marketable securities and 
restricted cash, calculated based on the Consolidated Financial Statements. As at the reporting date the Ratio was circa 60% (2012 – 44%).

c)  Failure to repay material debt – the company fails to repay any matured and undisputable debt in the amount of at least EUR 100 million within 30 days 

of its maturity.

NOTE 34 - SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 

A.  Debt restructuring plan (“the restructuring plan”)

The Company has been facing challenging market conditions for some years. These have primarily been caused by the underlying economic environment in 
many of the countries in which the Company operates, combined with the lack of transactional liquidity in the investment markets for assets such as those 
owned by the Company and the ongoing lack of traditional bank fi nancing available to real estate developers and investors. The signifi cant investments in India 
and Romania, prior to the crisis, the increased issuance of debt and the slow pace of properties realization caused the Group to experience very signifi cant 
losses and dragged the Group into cash fl ow distress. 

Against this background, the Company’s management has made some progress improving its cash position, primarily through costs cutting program and the 
disposal of certain properties.

In 2013, the Company has received net cash of circa EUR 61 million through the disposal of four assets (EUR 29 million) and the collection of the remaining 
proceeds from the transaction in the US (EUR 32 million).

In addition, it has applied intensive asset management initiatives to improve the income generated by the operating shopping centers portfolio, and has also 
managed to refi nance an EUR 59.3 million loan secured against one of its largest assets, held via a joint venture owned 50%, Diksna during November 2013 
(refer to note 14).The Company continues to actively market for sale all of its operating shopping centers as well as some of its undeveloped lands.

  However, despite efforts to progress with a number of asset disposals and a completion of some alternative fi nancing transactions, the Company was not able 
to execute its asset disposal plan within a timeframe that would have enabled it to meet its short-term obligations towards bondholders, specifi cally a circa 
EUR 15 million payment that was due to Polish bondholders on 18 November 2013 and a circa EUR 17 million payment that was due to Israeli bondholders 
on 31 December 2013, and therefore decided to withhold payment of principal and interest on maturities of all its bonds and any material payment to the 

134

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 33 / note 34

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Company’s creditors. Furthermore, due to cross default clauses in the Group’s bank facilities the Group has entered into, the fi nancing banks can force 
immediate repayments of the Group’s credit facilities (refer to note 16) which could result in foreclosure of the pledged property by the banks in cases of non-
recourse loans or, in cases of recourse loans, to execute the guaranties provided by the Group in favour of the banks. In the case of non-recourse loans, the 
Group would be entitled to any excess proceeds over the amounts owed. In the case of recourse loans, please see below. The Group has been in discussions 
with all affected banks and as of the date of approval of these fi nancial statements there were no early demand requests by any of the fi nancing banks. If 
the debt restructuring is successful, the technical breach of cross default clauses in the Groups’ bank facilities would be remedied and the existing loan 
agreements would continue in force. 

  On November 18, 2013, the Company has requested a restructuring plan (including suspension of payment proceedings) from the district court of Amsterdam, 

which is the legal seat of the Parent Company.

The court approved the Company’s request and granted a six-month period for reaching an agreement with its creditors until the creditors meeting scheduled 
for April 17, 2014. For the postponement of the creditor meeting refer to note 38(C).  If until June 26, 2014 the Company will not reach an agreement the court 
may switch to a liquidation procedure, which will probably cause signifi cant damages to the Company, its creditors and its shareholders. 

Parallel to the court approval, the court appointed: a special manager (“administrator”), who works with the Company’s management and approves every 
transaction, liability assumption or expense at the Company’s level and is suppose to recommend to the court to summon creditors meetings in order to vote 
for approving the restructuring plan; and a supervisory judge who supervises the procedure. The recommendation of the administrator will be transferred to 
the court only if he is convinced that the restructuring plan is fair and equal for all of the creditors. The administrator has appointed PwC Netherlands in order 
to economically review the restructuring plan on his behalf. 

Since the day of the Company’s announcement about applying to the district court of Amsterdam:

•  The Company’s management is continuously cooperating with the trustees and representatives of the bondholders, and assisting them and their 

representatives in every issue in order to promote the agreement and stay in the schedule set by the court.

•  Negotiations are being held between all parties in order to agree on the restructuring plan details.  

The main features of the proposed debt restructuring plan include:

To the shareholders

-  The shareholders will be requested to provide capital/monetary infl ow to the Company by way of rights issuance of EUR 20 million as a pre-condition to 
the coming into force of the debt restructuring plan. To the date of approval of these consolidated fi nancial statements this infl ow has not been formally 
committed. 

   To creditors with non-collateral backed debts

-  The group of creditors with non-collateral backed debts include the following lenders: bondholders in Israel, the bondholders in Poland and the banks with 

fi xed charges with a recourse right. 

-  The principle of the request from creditors with bondholders is based on deferring principal payment dates (and unpaid accrued interest for November /
December 2013) against intensifying collaterals (negative pledge on all of the Company’s assets), the grant of compensation on interest payments and 
participation in the equity upside (detailed below). 

-  The Company intends to put all efforts in order to avoid damages to the creditors, as practicable, from the situation that has resulted in the countries of 

operations, and due to the change in the trends of capital markets. 

-  The Company and its offi cers will not be held responsible against any claims, except claims for violation of fi duciary duty, fraud or claims for which a 

waiver cannot be granted under the law. 

Israeli bondholders and the institutional bondholders in Poland

Principal payments - all principal payments of non-collateral backed debts (bonds (series A) bonds (series B) and bonds held by institutional investors in 
Poland including unpaid interest due November/December 2013) for 2013, 2014 and 2015 in the amount of EUR 181.9 million (“the Deferred Debt”) will be 
deferred to 2016, 2017 and 2018 (at the same date and month of each series).

Interest payments – after the arrangement, interest payments will be made when due. 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

135

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Interest rate – effective January 1, 2014, an additional 1.5% interest will be paid (for the deferred payments (principal and interest until the end of 2013) in 
addition to compensation in interest to be received from shares granted as detailed in the equity upside section below.

Early repayment – the Company will be entitled to make early repayments at any time of any debt balance which is according to the adjusted Par value price 
of the bonds but it must make an early repayment upon realization or refi nancing of assets in a scope of 75% of the net cash fl ows that will be received by the 
Company. Upon making the early repayment, the debt in respect of the cumulative interest will be paid and thereafter the next principal payments. Out of the 
amount paid as an early repayment, 21.1% will be paid for bonds (series A), 70.7% will be paid for bonds (series B) and 8.2% will be paid for Polish bonds. 
(Each will be paid according to its relative share in the deferred debt (“Deferred Debt Ratio”)). 

Payment Deferral – This would occur in the event that in two years from the arrangement date, if the Company made early repayments of over 50% of the 
deferred debt (such that the balance of bonds (series A) will be lower than NIS 170 million  (EUR 36 million) par value and the balance of bonds (series B) will 
be lower than NIS 250 million (EUR 52 million) par value), then the remaining deferred principal payments will be deferred in an additional year (at the same 
date and month of each series). 

Equity Upside – to enable the creditors to enjoy an ‘Equity Upside’ feature, the Company will allocate, post the completion of the right issuance, to the Deferred 
Debt holders shares representing 13.5% of the Company’s shares (2.85% to series A holders, 9.54% to series B holders and 1.11% to the Polish holders) at 
no consideration. 

Payment to the holders of the Unsecured Debt – Following the removal of the suspension of payments order, the Company shall pay to the holders of the 
Deferred Debt holders an amount of EUR 10.5 million, on account of 2014 interest payments.

  Restriction of Payments to shareholders – the Company undertakes that as long as the deferred debt balance is not paid in full, certain limitations on 

distribution of dividends will apply.

Collaterals - a negative pledge on all of the Company’s assets meaning that the Company cannot pledge an unpledged asset, in favor of other lenders.  The 
asset value included in the negative pledge according to their book value (net of debt, if any) as of December 31, 2013 is EUR 381 million (assets less liabilities 
that are not bonds, including accrued interest).

Instructions on unpledged assets 
•  The Company may not take new loans against pledging existing unpledged assets and/or non collateral loans. Despite these restrictions, the Company may 
obtain fi nancing against a pledge and/or existing assets and/or non collateral loans provided that 75% of the fi nancing will be used for early repayment. 

•  The Company may pledge lands, fi rst in priority, for a construction loan in favor of a bank, with an loan to cost ratio that will not fall below 60%. 

Instructions on pledged assets 
•  The Company may obtain refi nancing or new loans with respect to each of the pledged assets provided that at least 75% of the extra fi nancing in respect of 

that asset will be used for early repayment. 

•  Upon selling an asset of the pledged assets, 75% of the net consideration received by the Company from selling the asset (after debt repayment to the 

bank, selling expenses and tax, if required) will be used for early repayment of the Unsecured Debt, to be allocated among the holders of Unsecured Debt in 
accordance with the Deferred Debt Ratio. 

•   The Company will be allowed to execute actual investments only if the Company’s cash reserves contain an amount equal to administrative expenses 

and interest payments for the Unsecured Debt for a six-month period (for this purpose also receivables with a high probability of being collected in the 
subsequent six-month period will be taken in account for the required minimal cash reserve). 

•  The Company may obtain new loans to purchase/build new assets provided that the loans will be of non-recourse type and the equity component in the 

purchase/build will not exceed 40%. 

To banks with Recourse right 

  Debt balance to banks: the debt balance in the Company’s books with a right of recourse as of December 31, 2013 amounts to EUR 48 million against assets 

valued at EUR 83 million which are pledged, with fi rst priority, to the banks.

136

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 34

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

  Recourse to the Company: deferring recourse right for four years

If the Company fails to meet its current payments and a debt balance to the banks remains after asset realization, the banks may demand the debt remaining  
shortfall only after four years from the arrangement date. The recourse right will be at the debt level before asset realization net of the highest between the 
received consideration from asset realization and 90% of the value of an external appraiser (to be agreed upon by the parties) in a time period of not more than 
three months before the realization date. 

  Debt restructuring plan (“the restructuring plan”)

The creditors have the right to accept or refuse the above mentioned features of the debt restructuring plan.  In general, in order to approve the restructuring 
plan, a simple majority of creditors allowed to vote (both by number of attendees in the actual voting and in the amount of the claim) is required. Creditors 
allowed to vote are comprised of bondholders and lenders at the Company’s level, as well as creditors having recourse right to the Company (for their 
unsecured claim).  A refusal will most probably lead to the liquidation of the Company.

The company believes that the proposed agreement is the optimal for allowing the Company to serve its debt for its creditors, and the Company’s management 
is doing its best in order to reach an agreement within the time frame that was granted by the court. 

Accordingly, management believes that, should the debt restructuring plan be accepted in the manner suggested by the Company, it would be able to retain 
signifi cant value for its shareholders (as shown in the table below) and will be able to repay its creditors in full. By contrast, the Board of Directors of the 
Company and management are convinced that a forced liquidation (which will occur, should the creditors reject the restructuring plan) will most probably 
cause shareholders and creditors to incur signifi cant losses. The following table presents the Group’s assets disposal plan until 2018 (net cash fl ows (being 
mainly net of asset specifi c borrowings and taxes), in millions of EUR):

Property name 

Total 

H1-2014 

H2-2014 

H1-2015 

H2-2015 

H1-2016 

H2-2016 

H1-2017 

H2-2017 

H1-2018

Riga Plaza (Diksna) 

Koregaon Park Plaza* 

Torun´ Plaza 

Bangalore 

Suwałki Plaza 

Casa Radio - turbines** 

Leszno Plaza 

Kragujevac Plaza 

Ias¸i Plaza 

Łódz´  (Residential) 

Târgu Mures¸ Plaza 

Kielce Plaza 

Hunedoara Plaza 

Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) 

Cina (Romania) 

Łódz´  Plaza 

Timis¸oara Plaza 

Casa Radio - project 

Belgrade Plaza (MUP) 

21.5 

18.1 

49.8 

25.9 

10.6 

5.0 

1.0 

15.9 

8.0 

6.0 

4.0 

3.0 

1.5 

30.7 

7.5 

31.3 

26.1 

171.1 

53.6 

21.5 

12.5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

5.6 

49.8 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

12.9 

10.6 

5.0 

1.0 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

13 

- 

- 

- 

15.9 

8.0 

6.0 

4.0 

3.0 

1.5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Total 

490.6 

34 

55.4 

29.5 

51.4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

30.7 

7.5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

31.3 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

26.1 

- 

- 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

171.1

53.6

38.2 

31.3 

26.1 

224.7

*  For the sale of Koregaon park, refer to note 34 (G).

** For the sale of turbines, resulting in different amount of cash infl ow, refer to note 38 (B).

The Company’s website (www.plazacenters.com) includes non-audited information related to the debt restructuring.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

137

 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

B.  Update and impairment in respect of the Bangalore and Chennai projects 

Bangalore

In March 2008, Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd. (“EPI”), a 47.5% joint venture company held together with EI, entered into an amended and 
reinstated share subscription and framework agreement (the “Amended Framework Agreement”), with a local third party (the “Partner”) and a wholly 
owned Indian subsidiary of EPI which was designated for this purpose (“SPV”), to acquire, through the SPV, up to 440 acres of land in Bangalore, India (the 
“Project”) in certain phases as set forth in the Amended Framework Agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the Partner has surrendered land transfer deeds in 
favour of the SPV to a trustee nominated by the parties for approximately 54 acres for a total aggregate consideration of approximately INR 2,843 million (EUR 
40 million), and upon the actual transfer of the title, the Partner will be entitled to receive 50% of the shareholdings in the SPV.  The abovementioned amounts 
are presented in the statement of fi nancial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 as equity accounted investees.  

In addition, the SPV paid to the Partner advances of approximately INR 2,536 million (EUR 35 million) on account of future acquisitions by the SPV of a further 
51.6 acres. Such amount is presented in the statement of fi nancial position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 as part of the equity accounted investees (refer 
to note 14).

  On July 22, 2010, EPI, the SPV and the Partner signed a new framework agreement which, subject to certain conditions (which, as of December 31, 2013, 

have not been satisfi ed yet), is supposed to replace the Amended Framework Agreement (the “New Framework Agreement”). 

The New Framework Agreement established new commercial understandings between the parties thereto, pertaining, inter alia, to the joint development of 
the Project and its magnitude and fi nancing, the commercial relationships and working methods between the parties and the distribution mechanism of the 
revenues from the Project.  In accordance with the New Framework Agreement, the following commercial terms have been, inter alia, agreed between the 
parties:

•  EPI will remain the holder of 100% of the shareholdings and the voting rights in the SPV.
•  The scope of the new project will be decreased to approximately 165 acres instead of the original 440 acres.
•  The Partner undertakes to complete the acquisitions of the additional land and/or the development rights therein in order to obtain the ownership and/or 

the development rights over all 165 acres.

•  Neither EPI nor the SPV will be required to pay any additional amounts in respect of the land acquisitions or with respect to the Project and its 

development.

•  The Project will be re-designed as an exclusive residential project.
•  The Project will be executed jointly by the Partner and the SPV. The Partner (or any of its affi liates) will also serve as the general contractor and marketing 

manager of the project. Under the New Framework Agreement, the Partner is also committed to maximum sale prices, minimum construction costs 
threshold and a detailed timeline and budget with respect to the development of the project

  Under the New Framework Agreement, EPI will receive distributions  (following a certain 3+6 months reserve mechanism to enable the Partner to utilize a 

portion of the proceeds for construction costs and expenses) of approximately 70% of the net proceeds from the Project (including the proceeds from any sale 
by the Partner or any transaction with respect to the original land which does not form part of the said 165 acres), until such time that EPI’s investment in the 
amount of INR 5,780 million (approximately EUR 80 million) (“EPI’s Investment”) plus an Internal Return Rate of 20% per annum calculated from September 
30, 2009 (“IRR”) is paid to the SPV on behalf of EPI) (the “Discharge Date”). 

Following the Discharge Date, EPI will not be entitled to receive any additional profi ts from the Project and it will transfer to the Partner the entire 
shareholdings in the SPV for no consideration. In addition, the Partner has a call option, subject to applicable law and regulations, to acquire the entire 
shareholdings of the SPV, at any time, in consideration for EPI’s Investment plus an IRR of 20% per annum calculated on the relevant date of acquisition.

The New Framework Agreement will enter into full force and effect upon execution of certain ancillary agreements described therein as well as satisfaction of 
certain other conditions; however, EPI, the SPV and the Partner are actually pursuing the Project itself in accordance with the New Framework Agreement. 

In January 2011, the Partner has submitted the development plans pertaining to approximately 49 plus 35 acres included in the scope of the new project 
of 165 acres to the local planning authority, the Bangalore Development Authority (“BDA”). In October 2011, the BDA had notifi ed the Partner that the 
development plans cannot be considered due to a future eminent domain plan. 

In January 2012, the Partner applied to the State High Court, requesting to issue a court order directing the BDA to consider the development plans. In March 
2012, the court awarded a judgment pertaining to approximately 49 acres, ordering the BDA to consider the development plans related to the said 49 acres 
(“Development Plan”), while ignoring any future eminent domain plan that may be considered by the state authorities. 

138

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 34

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

In December 2012, the BDA decided to submit the Development Plan pertaining to the aforementioned 49 acres to the Sensitive Zone Sub-Committee of the 
BDA and in January 2013, the Sensitive Zone Sub-Committee of the BDA granted its approval to the aforementioned Development Plan. In May 2013, the court 
awarded a judgment pertaining to the additional 35 acres, ordering the BDA to consider the development plans related to the said 35 acres as well.

As for December 31, 2013 due to the uncertainly of the Group ability to develop the project in the foreseeable future the Group measured the net realizable 
value of the project according to the comparable model. As a result the Group recorded EUR 31 million write down expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.

Chennai

In December 2007 EPI, executed agreements for the establishment of a special purpose vehicle (“Chennai Project SPV”) together with one of the leading real 
estate developers in Chennai (in this section, the “Local Partner”). Subject to the fulfi lment of certain conditions, the Chennai Project SPV undertook to acquire 
the ownership and development rights in and up to 135 acres of land situated in the Sipcot Hi-Tech Park in the Siruseri District of Chennai, India. 

  Under these agreements, EPI is to hold 80% of the equity and voting rights in the Chennai Project SPV, while the Local Partner will retain the remaining 20%.  
Under the agreement, EPI’s investment in the Chennai Project SPV will be a combination of investment in shares and compulsory convertible debentures. Due 
to changes in market conditions, EPI and the Chennai Project SPV later decided to limit the extent of the project to 83.4 acres.  

As at the date of these fi nancial statements,  the Project  SPV has completed the purchase of approximately 75 acres out of the total 83.4 acres for 
consideration of approximately INR 2,367 million (approximately EUR 33 million). An additional amount of INR 564 million (approximately EUR 8 million) was 
paid in advance in order to secure the acquisition of an additional 8.4 acres. 

A shareholders agreement in respect of the management of the Chennai Project SPV provides for a fi ve member board of directors, four of whom are 
appointed by EPI. The shareholders agreement also includes certain pre-emptive rights and restrictions on transferring securities in the Chennai Project SPV. 

Profi t distributions declared by the Chennai Project SPV will be distributed in accordance with the shareholders’ proportionate shareholdings in that company, 
subject to EPI’s entitlement to receive certain preferential payments out of the Chennai Project SPV’s cash fl ow on the terms specifi ed in the agreements. 

The consummation of the agreements will be accomplished in stages, and is subject to the fulfi lment of certain regulatory requirements, as well as to the 
Company’s satisfactory due diligence investigations, in respect of each stage. 

  However, EPI is currently negotiating certain changes in the project’s implementation plan and holding structure, which would require changes also in the 

respective agreements. Among other things, should those changes be accepted, EPI shall not be required to advance more fi nancing to the project in addition 
to the amounts mentioned above and shall hold all the issued and outstanding share capital of the SPV. 

In furtherance of the foregoing, EPI is currently operating to secure a joint development agreement with local developer(s) for the development of the project 
land, in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines.

As for December 31, 2013 due to the uncertainly of the Group ability to develop the project in the foreseeable future the Group recorded EUR 20.7 million write 
down expenses in the Company’s profi t or loss.

C.  Additional impairments

For additional impairments information refer to notes 10 and 14.

D.  Selling of joint venture in India

  On May 29, 2013 the Company completed the sale of its 50% interests in an Investee which mainly held interests in an offi ce complex project located in Pune, 
Maharashtra. The transaction valued the Investee collectively at EUR 33.4 million and, as a result, the Company has received gross cash proceeds of circa 
EUR 16.7 million in line with its holding. The Company recorded a loss of EUR 5.1 million from the disposal, mainly due to reclassifi cation of foreign currency 
translation reserve associated with the investment to the statement of profi t or loss in the amount of EUR 4.3 million.

E.  Disposal of assets in the Czech Republic

  On July 18th 2013 the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in a vehicle which holds the interest in the Prague 3 project (“Prague 3”), a logistics 
and commercial center in the third district of Prague. Earlier this year, the Company completed its successful application to change the zoning use of Prague 3 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

139

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

to a residential scheme. The transaction values the asset at circa EUR 11 million and, as a result, further to related bank fi nancing and other adjustments to the 
statement of fi nancial position, the Company has received cash proceeds of net EUR 7.6 million.  The Company has disposed the Prague 3 investment property 
asset, and has recorded a loss from fair value adjustment of EUR 4.2 million, included in other expenses in the statement of profi t or loss.

In addition, in July 2013 the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in a vehicle which held the interest in another plot of land in Prague.  The 
transaction values the asset at circa EUR 1.9 million and, as a result, further to liability to third parties, the Company has received cash proceeds of EUR 1.3 
million. The Company has accounted for a EUR 3.5 million write down of this trading property in the second quarter of 2013 presented within write down of 
trading properties in the statement of profi t or loss. The Company recorded a loss of EUR 0.3 million as a result of this disposal.

F.  Disposal of equity accounted investees Ercorner and Uj Údvar in Hungary

  On October 31, 2013 the Consortium of shareholders of Dream Island, in which the Company indirectly holds a 43.5% stake, has completed the sale of its 

Dream Island project land holding to the Hungarian State for circa EUR 17 million. The Consortium comprises an 87% holding interest of Ercorner, the 50:50 
joint venture between the Company and a Hungarian commercial bank, as well as other small holders.

The proceeds of the transaction were used by the Consortium to repay a proportion of the securitized related bank debt held against the asset. 

In addition to the above, in December 2013 the consortium of shareholders of Új Udvar, in which the Company indirectly holds a 35% stake, has completed 
the sale of its Új Udvar project holding to a private investor for a consideration of EUR 2.4 million. The Company has accounted for a EUR 1.9 million write 
down of this investee in the fourth quarter of 2013 presented within write down of equity accounted investees in the statement of profi t or loss.  The Company 
recorded as a result of this transaction a loss of EUR 0.1 million.

G.  Agreement to sell Indian shopping mall 

  On November 14, 2013 the Company, announced that it has reached an agreement to sell Koregaon Park Plaza, a retail and entertainment located in Pune, 
India, subject to the satisfaction of certain closing conditions. The transaction values the asset at EUR 40.3 million, the asset’s current carrying amount. 
Therefore no signifi cant gain or loss is expected on the transaction besides the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve to be transferred to the profi t or loss 
from Other Comprehensive Income.

Following the repayment of the outstanding related bank loan, the Company will receive aggregate gross cash proceeds from the purchaser totalling circa EUR 18. 

Subject to fulfi lment of certain conditions, including consent from the fi nancing bank, the Company expects to collect circa EUR 12 million until the end of 
2014 (EUR 2.3 million were already collected as of the day of statement of fi nancial position) and the remaining EUR 6 million consideration is expected to be 
collected in 2015 and 2016.

In respect of the fi re which occurred in this shopping center refer to note 34 (J) below.

H.  Dissolving of an equity accounting investee in the US

In March 2013, the Company’s 50% joint arrangement investee Elbit Plaza USA (“EPUS”) was liquidated.  As part of the liquidation procedure, the Company 
received an amount of USD 42 million (EUR 32 million), being its part in the remaining cash in EPUS.  The dissolving did not result in any material effect on 
the statement of profi t or loss of the Company.

I.  Treasury bond held

As of December 31, 2013, the Company hold through it’s wholly owned subsidiary 15.9 million NIS par value bonds in series B debentures (adjusted par value 
of NIS 18.6 million (EUR 3.9 million). 

J.  Fire in the Company’s shopping center in India

In June 2012 a fi re event occurred at the Company’s shopping center in Pune, India.  The fi re required a temporary close-down of the shopping center, but did 
not consume the entire shopping center. In respect of impairments performed refer to note 11. The Company was refunded in July 2013 in the amount of a 
EUR 7 million damage insurance claim relating to the fi re.  In respect of covering the loss of income insurance claim, the Company is expected to collect circa 
EUR 2.5 million from this claim which has not been accrued, and is treated as a contingent asset.

140

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 34

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

K.  Transaction during 2012 in the United States

  On January 10, 2012 EDT, a wholly owned subsidiary of EPN Group, the Company’s joint US subsidiary (held indirectly 22.69% by the Company through 

EPUS), reached an agreement to sell 47 of its 49 US-based shopping centers in a transaction totalling USD 1.43 billion (EUR 1.13 billion). The closing of this 
transaction occurred on June 20, 2012.

The centers were acquired by BRE DDR Retail Holdings LLC, a joint venture between Blackstone Real Estate Advisors VII L.P. (“Blackstone Real Estate”) and 
DDR. Of the transaction value of USD 1.43 billion, a total of USD 934 million (EUR 736 million) was paid by way of assumption of the property level debt or 
repaid by EPN Group. In addition, all excess cash within EDT, which was circa USD 30 million (EUR 24 million), was retained by the vendor. 

Following the sale of the 47 properties, EPN Group held two properties located in the United States that were valued at approximately USD 42 million (EUR 33 
million) with total non-recourse secured debt of approximately USD 13 million (EUR 11 million).   In July 2012, EPN Group sold its two remaining assets in the 
US for a total aggregate asset value of USD 42 million (EUR 33 million).   

  Non-recourse secured debt of approximately USD 13 million (EUR 11 million) was also assumed in the abovementioned transactions. As the Company 

indirectly held 22.69% of these US assets, the Company share in the net proceeds totaled EUR 5 million, with no realized gain or loss resulting.  
The table below is a summary of the 2012 transaction results of selling the 47 properties:

Company’s part in transaction costs 

Foreign currency translation reserve reclassified to consolidate statement of profit or loss  

  Realized gain on sale of investment properties 

L.  2012 Disposals of trading property plots in Bulgaria and Hungary 

€ 000’

(9,339) 
9,730  

       391

In July 2012 the Company sold its stake (51%) in a plot of land located in Sofi a, Bulgaria for a total net consideration of EUR 0.1 million. In addition, certain 
bank loans and other liabilities in a total amount of EUR 13 million were assumed by the buyer and is not included in the Company’s consolidated fi nancial 
statements starting the third quarter of 2012. No material gain or loss was recorded as a result of this transaction.

In October 2012 the Company, through its jointly held investee in Hungary, disposed of a plot of land adjacent to its Dream Island property plot in Budapest 
Hungary.  As part of the transaction, a loan in the amount of EUR 5.9 (Company’s share) was assigned to the buyer, and the plot with a total book value of 
EUR 4.5 million was disposed of.  The Investee recorded as a result of this transaction a gain of EUR 1.4 million in 2012, included as part of share in results of 
equity accounted investees. 

M. Fantasy Park settlement 

The Company‘s subsidiary, Fantasy Park Sp. z o.o. (“Fantasy Park”) was involved in several legal proceedings with Klépierre S.A subsidiaries (“Klépierre”) in 
Poland in connection with certain terms of the lease agreements signed between the parties, including certain amendments thereto which were agreed at a 
later stage (“Lease”). 

In March 2013 Fantasy Park reached a settlement , according to which Fantasy Park paid Klépierre EUR 0.5 million and vacated the premises, and by that 
Fantasy Park settled all the pending disputes, as well as any other disputes that may arise in the future in connection with the Lease. The Fantasy Park 
settlement generated a gain of EUR 0.2 million, included as other income in profi t or loss.

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

141

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

NOTE 35 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party transactions

Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Details of transactions between 
the Group and other related parties are disclosed below.

The Company has six directors. The annual remuneration of the directors in 2013 amounted to EUR 0.9 million (2012 – EUR 0.9 million) and the annual share 
based payments expenses amounted to EUR 0.1 million (2012- EUR 0.5 million). There was no change in the number of Company options granted to key 
personnel in 2013. There are no other benefi ts granted to directors.  Information about related party balances as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 refer to note 18.

Trading transactions

During the year, Group entities had the following trading transactions with related parties that are not members of the Group:

Income 

Interest on balances with EI 

Costs and expenses 

Recharges - EI and  EUL 

Executive director1 

Aviation services - Jet Link2 

Project management provision and charges -Control Centers group2 

For the year ended 

For the year ended

December 31, 2013 

December 31, 2012

€’000 

139 

233 

222 

- 

327 

€’000

213

548

240

61

1,381

1  The Executive Director, who is also the former controlling shareholder of the ultimate parent company, is receiving an annual salary of USD 300 thousand. 

2  Jet Link Ltd. and Control Centers (refer to note 33 a(1) and a(2)) are companies owned by the former ultimate shareholder of the Company.  Control Centers group costs were capitalized 

to the relevant trading property.

142

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 35 / note 36

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 36 - OPERATING SEGMENTS 

The Group comprises the following main reportable geographical segments: CEE, India and the US (starting June 30, 2010).  None of the Group’s tenants is 
accounting for more than 10% of the total revenue. Also, no revenue is derived in the Netherlands, where the Company is domiciled. The US segment was 
discontinued with effect from December 31, 2012.  In presenting information on the basis of geographical segments, segment revenue is based on the revenue 
resulted from either the selling or operating of assets geographically located in the relevant segment. Refer to note 11 for further detail by property on carrying 
amounts of Trading Properties and note 16 for detail on project secured bank loans by property.

Year ended December 31, 2013 

Total revenues1 

Central & Eastern Europe 

€’000 

26,340 

India 

€’000 

683 

Total

€’000

27,023

Operating loss by segment 

(92,684) 

(20,756) 

(113,440)

Net fi nance costs 

Other expenses, net 

Share in results of equity-accounted investees  

(5,858) 

(6,402) 

1,348 

(4,054) 

(4,653) 

(56,813) 

(9,912)

(11,055)

(55,465)

Reportable segment loss before tax2 

(103,596) 

(86,276) 

(189,872)

Less - unallocated general and administrative expenses (Dutch corporate level costs). 

Discontinued operations US (refer to note 37) 

Unallocated other expenses (Dutch corporate level) 

Unallocated fi nance costs (Dutch corporate level- mainly debentures fi nance cost) 

Loss before income taxes 

Tax benefi t 

Loss for the period 

Assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2013 

Total segment assets3 

Unallocated assets (Mainly Cash and other fi nancial instruments held of Dutch level) 

480,196 

68,829 

Total assets 

Segment liabilities  

Unallocated liabilities (Mainly debentures) 

Total liabilities 

175,302 

26,715 

1  Out of which EUR 16.6 million is attributed to Poland.

2  Central Eastern Europe – including EUR 109 million of impairments. India – including EUR 76 million of impairments.

3  Refer to note 11 for the breakdown of Trading Property assets by location.

(5,090)

65

-

(29,432)

(224,329)

6,256

(218,073)

549,025

36,741

585,766

202,017

173,421

375,438

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

143

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Year ended December 31, 2012 (Restated) 

Total revenues1 

Central & Eastern Europe 

€’000 

28,373 

India 

€’000 

1,650 

Operating loss by segment2 

(60,732) 

(16,622) 

Net fi nance costs 

Other income, net  

Share in profi t of equity-accounted investees 

(10,345) 

1,346 

1,348 

(3,039) 

7,611 

127 

Reportable segment loss before tax 

(68,383) 

(11,923) 

Less - unallocated general and administrative expenses (Dutch corporate level) 

Discontinued operations US (refer to note 37) 

Unallocated other expenses (Dutch corporate level) 

Unallocated fi nance costs (Dutch corporate level) 

Loss before income taxes 

Tax benefi t 

Loss for the period 

Assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2012 

Total segment assets 

Unallocated assets (Mainly Dutch level fi nancial instruments) 

630,851 

152,943 

Total assets 

Segment liabilities  

Unallocated liabilities (Mainly debentures) 

Total liabilities 

205,530 

37,765 

1  Out of which EUR 19.7 million is attributed to Poland.

2  Central Eastern Europe – including EUR 68.1 million of impairments. India – including EUR 15.6 million of impairments.

3  Refer to note 11 for the breakdown of Trading Property assets by location.

Total

€’000

30,023

(77,354)

(13,384)

8,957

1,475

(80,306)

(5,438)

(2,044)

(1,109)

(3,857)

(92,755)

6,592

(86,163)

783,794

102,024

885,818

243,295

199,591

442,886

144

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 36 / note 37

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 37 – DISCONTINUED OPERATION

Following the disposal of US assets (refer to note 34(L)) the Company discontinued its US activity. The results are the results of the equity accounted investee EPUS. 

Results for discontinued operation 
Revenues 
Expenses1 

Results from operating activity 

Tax benefi t 

Results from operating activities, net of tax 

Gain on sale of discontinued operation 

Profi t (loss) for the year from discontinued operation 

Earnings per share 

2013 
€’000 

2012 Revised
€’000

- 

- 

- 

- 

65 

65 

13,907
(16,942)

(3,035)

600

(2,435)

391

(2,044)

Basic and diluted loss per share (in EURO) 

(0.00) 

(0.01)

1  2012 - Including reduction in value of investment property in the amount of EUR 2,254 thousand.

Below is the information on allocation of profi t between the owners of the Company and non-controlling interests:

Loss for the year from continuing operations 
Attributable to owners of the Company  
Attributable to non-controlling interests 

Profi t (loss) for the year from discontinued operations 
Attributable to owners of the Company  
Attributable to non-controlling interests 

Cash fl ow from (used in) discontinued operation 

Net cash from (used in) operating activities 
Net cash from investing activities   

Net cash fl ow for the year 

Effect of disposal on the 2012 fi nancial position of the investee EPUS 

Investment property 
Interest bearing loan from banks   
Trade and other payables  

2013 
€’000 

- 
- 
- 

2013 
€’000 

65 
65 
- 

2013 
€’000 

(65) 
- 

(65) 

2012 Revised
€’000

(84,119) 
(84,119)
-

2012 Revised
€’000

(2,044)
(2,044)
-

2012
€’000 

2,044
63,885

65,929

2012
€’000 

(263,047)
161,560
14,064

(87,423)

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

145

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Reclassifi cation in statement of comprehensive income due to discontinued operation

In 2012 the movement is attributable to creation of translation reserve (EUR 2.8 million), as well as reclassifi cation of amounts from the translation reserve to 
profi t or loss (EUR 9.7 million).

NOTE 38 – EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

A.  Selling of airplane

  On February 25, 2014 the Company disposed the airplane for a total consideration of USD 1.9 million (EUR 1.4 million).  The proceeds from the disposal were 

used to repay the bank facility taken for the purchase of the airplane, and the Company currently negotiates with the fi nancing bank the conditions to be set for the 
repayment of the remaining outstanding bank loan (circa EUR 1 million).

B.  Sale of turbines

In March 2014 the Casa Radio project company disposed of the turbines held in respect of the Casa Radio project (refer also to note 11) for a total net 
consideration of EUR 2.6 million. 

C.  Postponement of creditors meeting to vote on the restructuring plan 

  On 11 March 2014, the Company obtained from the Dutch Court a postponement of the dates for the voting on the proposed plan, due to technicalities involved 

with the completion of the arrangement. 

The Dutch Court set 26 June 2014 as the date for voting on the proposed restructuring plan, as to be amended.  The Company does not expect this postponement 
to have any effect on its ability to conclude the restructuring plan to the satisfaction of both its creditors and shareholders.

146

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 38 / note 39

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

NOTE 39 - LIST OF GROUP ENTITIES 

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owns the following companies (all are 100% held subsidiaries at the end of the reporting period 

presented unless otherwise indicated):

HUNGARY 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Plaza Centers Establishment B.V. 
Kerepesi 5 Irodaépület Ingatlanfejleszto˝ Kft. 

Inactive 
Holder of land usage rights 

Plaza House Ingatlanfejlesztési Kft. 
HOM Ingatlanfejlesztési és Vezetési Kft. 
Szombathely 2002 Ingatlanhasznosító és Vagyonkezelo˝ Kft. 
Tatabánya Plaza Ingatlanfejlesztési Kft. 

Offi ce building 
Management company 
Inacitve 
Inacitve

100% held by Plaza Centers Establishment B.V.
Aréna Plaza extension project
David House

SLOVAKIA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

REMARKS

Kielce Plaza project
Leszno Plaza project
Łódz´  (Residential) project
Białystok Plaza project
Radom Plaza project
Łódz´  Plaza project
O2 Fitness Club project

Directly wholly owned 
Plaza Centers Slovak Republic S.R.O. 

POLAND 

Directly wholly owned 
Kielce Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Leszno Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Łódz´  Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Olsztyn Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Płock Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Włocławek Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
O2 Fitness Club Sp. z o.o. 
Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V. 
EDMC Sp. z o.o. 
Plaza Centers (Poland) Sp. z o.o. 
Bytom Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Bielsko-Biała Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Bydgoszcz Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Chorzów Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Gdan´sk Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Gliwice Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Gorzów Wielkopolski Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Jelenia Góra Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Katowice Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Legnica Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Opole Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Radom Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Rzeszów Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Szczecin Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Tarnów Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Torun´ Centrum Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Tychy Plaza Sp. z o.o. 

Inactive

ACTIVITY 

Shopping center project 
Owns plot of land 
Owns plot of land 
Owns plot of land 
Owns plot of land 
Mixed-use project 
Entertainment 
Holding company 
Management company 
Management company 
Inactive 
Inacitve 
Inacitve 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

147

 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

Indirectly or jointly owned 
Legnica Plaza Spółka z ograniczona˛ 
odpowiedzialnos´cia˛ S.K.A. 
Suwałki Plaza Sp.z.o.o. 

Operating shopping center 

Operating shopping center 

Zgorzelec Plaza Sp. z o.o. 

Operating shopping center 

Lublin Or Sp. z o.o. 
EDP Plaza Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Suwałki Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Torun´ Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Zgorzelec Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Bytom Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Łódz´  Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Poznan´ Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Warszawa Sp. z o.o. 
Fantasy Park Investments Sp. z o.o. 

Inactive 
Inactive 
Entertainment 
Entertainment 
Entertainment 
Entertainment 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inacitve 

100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
Torun´ Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V. 
Suwałki Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers Polish Operations B.V.
Zgorzelec Plaza project
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V. with Israeli-based partner
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V. with Israeli-based partner
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.
100% held by Mulan B.V.

LATVIA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Indirectly or jointly owned 
Diksna SIA 

Operating shopping center 

Fantasy Park Latvia SIA 

Entertainment 

Equity accounted investee - 50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.  
50% held by JV partner
Riga Plaza project
100% held by Mulan B.V.

ROMANIA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Dâmbovit¸a Centers Holding B.V. 
Plaza Bas B.V. 
S.C. Elite Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Green Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. North Eastern Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. North West Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. North Gate Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Eastern Gate Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. South Gate Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Mountain Gate Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Palazzo Ducale S.R.L. 
S.C. Plaza Centers Management Romania S.R.L. 
S.C. Central Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. White Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Blue Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Golden Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. West Gate Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. South Eastern Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. South West Plaza S.R.L. 
S.C. Plaza Operating Management S.R.L. 

Indirectly or jointly owned 
S.C. Dâmbovit¸a Center S.R.L. 

Adams Invest S.R.L. 

Holding company 
Holding company 
Shopping center project 
Shopping center project 
Shopping center project 
Shopping center project 
Shopping center project 
Real estate project 
Shopping center project 
Shopping center project 
Offi ce building  
Management company 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive

Mixed-use project 

Residential project 

50.1% held by Plaza Centers N.V. 
Timis¸oara Plaza project
Ias¸i Plaza project
Constant¸a Plaza project
Hunedoara Plaza project
Csíki Plaza (Miercurea Ciuc) project
Cina project
Slatina Plaza project
Târgu Mures¸ Plaza project
Palazzo Ducale

75% held by Dâmbovit¸a Centers Holding B.V.
Casa Radio project
Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.
50% held by partner
Valley View project

148

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 39

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Colorado Invest S.R.L. 

Residential project 

Malibu Invest S.R.L. 

Residential project 

Spring Invest S.R.L. 

Offi ce project 

Sunny Invest S.R.L. 

Residential project 

Primavera Invest S.R.L. 

Offi ce project 

Bas Developement S.R.L. 

Residential project 

Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
50% held by partner
Pine Tree project
Equity accounted investee - 25% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
75% held by partner
Fountain Park project
Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
50% held by partner
Primavera Tower Bras¸ov project
Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
50% held by partner
Green Land project
Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
50% held by partner
Primavera Tower Ploies¸ti project
Equity accounted  investee - 50% held by Plaza Bas B.V.  
50% held by partner
Acacia Park project

MOLDOVA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
I.C.S. Plaza Centers Prodev S.R.L. 

SERBIA 

Directly wholly owned 
Plaza Centers Holding B.V. 
Plaza Centers (Estates) B.V. 
Plaza Centers (Ventures) B.V. 
Plaza Centers Logistic B.V. 
S.S.S. Project Management B.V. 
Plaza Centers Management D.O.O. 

Indirectly or jointly owned 
Sek D.O.O. 

Accent D.O.O. 

Telehold D.O.O. 

CZECH REPUBLIC 

Directly wholly owned 
P4 Plaza S.R.O. 
Plaza Centers Czech Republic S.R.O. 

Inactive

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 
Management company 

Operating shopping center 

Shopping center project 

Inactive 

ACTIVITY 

100% held by Plaza Centers Holding B.V.
Kragujevac Plaza project
100% held by Plaza Centers (Estates) B.V.
Belgrade Plaza (Visnjicka) project
100% held by Plaza Centers (Ventures) B.V.
Belgrade Plaza (MUP) project
100% held by Plaza Centers Logistic B.V.
Kruševac Plaza project
100% held by S.S.S. Project Management B.V.

REMARKS

Leisure Group D.O.O. 

Shopping center project 

Orchid Group D.O.O. 

Shopping center project 

Operating shopping center 
Management company

Liberec Plaza project

BULGARIA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Shumen Plaza EOOD 
Plaza Centers Management Bulgaria EOOD 

Shopping center project 
Management company

Shumen Plaza project

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

plaza centers/notes to the 

fi nan

GREECE 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Helios Plaza S.A. 

Indirectly or jointly owned 
Elbit Cochin Island Ltd. 

CYPRUS – UKRAINE 

Directly wholly owned 
Tanoli Enterprises Ltd. 
PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd. 
Plaza Centers Ukraine Ltd. 
Nourolet Enterprises Ltd. 

Shopping center project 

Pireas Plaza project

Inactive 

ACTIVITY 

40% held by Plaza Centers N.V.

REMARKS

Finance activity 
Inactive 
Management company / Inactive 
Inactive 

100% held by PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd.
100% held by PC Ukraine Holdings Ltd.

THE NETHERLANDS 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
P.L.A.Z.A B.V. 

Holding company – Poland 

Plaza Dâmbovit¸a Complex B.V. 
Plaza Centers Enterprises B.V. 
Mulan B.V. (Fantasy Park Enterprises B.V.) 
Plaza Centers Administrations B.V. 
Plaza Centers Connections B.V. 
Plaza Centers Engagements B.V. 
Plaza Centers Foundation B.V. 
Plaza Centers Management B.V. 

Holding company 
Finance company 
Holding company 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 

50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Mulan B.V.
Holds Hokus Pokus Rozrywka Sp. z o.o. jointly with 
Plaza Centers N.V. (50%–50%)

100% held by Plaza Dâmbovit¸a Complex B.V.
Holds Fantasy Park subsidiaries in CEE

THE DUTCH ANTILLES 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Dreamland Entertainment N.V. 

CYPRUS – INDIA 

Directly wholly owned 
PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd. 

Indirectly or jointly owned 
Permindo Ltd. 

Inactive

ACTIVITY 

Holding company 

Holding company 

Anuttam Developers Pvt. Ltd. 

Operating shopping center 

HOM India Management Services Pvt. Ltd. 
Spiralco Holdings Ltd. 
Rebeldora Ltd. 
Rosesmart Ltd. 
Xifi us Services Ltd. 
Dezimark Ltd. 
Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd. 
Polyvendo Ltd. 

Management company 
Holding company 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Inactive 
Holding company 
Holding company 

REMARKS

100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd. 
Holds 99.9% of Anuttam Developers Pvt. Ltd.
99.99% held by Permindo Ltd. 
Koregaon Park Plaza project
99.99% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
100% held by PC India Holdings Public Company Ltd.
Equity accounted investee - 47.5% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.

150

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
consolidated

cial statements

note 39

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Elbit Plaza India Management Services Pvt. Ltd. 
Kadavanthra Builders Pvt. Ltd. 

Management company 
Mixed-use project 

Aayas Trade Services Pvt. Ltd. 

Mixed-use project 

Elbit India Architectural Services Ltd. 

Inactive 

99.99% held by Polyvendo Ltd.
80% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Chennai (SipCot) project
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.
Bangalore project (refer to note 34(B))
100% held by Elbit Plaza India Real Estate Holdings Ltd.

Entities disposed or dissolved in 2012 and 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Indirectly or jointly owned
Elbit Plaza USA II LP (“EPUS 2”) 

EPN REIT II 
Elbit Plaza USA LP 

Plaza USA LLC 
Elbit USA LLC 
Elbit USA II LLC 
EPN GP LLC 

Holding company 

Inactive 
Holding company 

Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 

EPN EDT Holdings II LLC 

Holding company 

EDT Retail Trust (Australia) 

Inactive 

EDT U.S Trust INC. (US REIT I) 

Holding company 

EDT Fund LLC (US LLC) 
EDT U.S Trust II INC. (US REIT II) 

Inactive 
Inactive 

Elbit Plaza II USA LP 

Holding company 

EPN Investment Management LLC 

Management company 

EPN Fund GP LLC 
EPN Real Estate Fund LP (Fund) 

EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC 
EPN Holdings I LLC 

Holding company 
Holding company 

Holding company 
Holding company 

EDT Retail Trust Management LLC (US MGR) 

Holding company 

EDT Retail Management Ltd. (Australia) 
EPN Operations LLC 

Management company / Inactive 
Inactive 

EPN REIT II LLC 

Inactive 

Equity accounted investee
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
Held 100% by EPUS II
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
100% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
21.64% held by Plaza USA LLC
12.18% held by Elbit USA LLC
9.47% held by Elbit USA II LLC
23.64% held by Plaza USA LLC
13.3% held by Elbit USA LLC
10.34% held by Elbit USA II LLC
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
100% held by EDT U.S Trust INC. (US REIT)
52% held by EPN EDT Holdings II LLC
48% held by EPN GP LLC
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Elbit Imaging Ltd.
50% held by Elbit Plaza USA LP
50% held by US-based partner
43.75% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
99.8% held by Israeli-based partner
0.2% held by EPN Fund GP LLC
100% held by EPN Real Estate Fund LP (Fund)
43.29% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
13.42% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
43.29% held by US-based partner
50% held by EPN Holdings I LLC
50% held by US-based partner
100% held by EDT Retail Trust Management LLC (US MGR)
43.29% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
13.42% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
43.29% held by US-based partner
45.375% held by Elbit Plaza II USA LP
9.25% held by EPN Real Estate Fund Holdings LLC
45.375% held by US-based partner

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

151

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

L
A

I

C
N
A
N

I

F

HUNGARY 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Szeged 2002 Ingatlanhasznosító és Vagyonkezelo˝ Kft. 
SBI Hungary Ingatlanforgalmazó és Építo˝ Kft. 

Inactive 
Shopping center 

Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft. 

Holding company 

Álom Sziget 2004 Ingatlanfejleszto˝ Kft. 

Mixed-use project 

DI Gaming Holding Ltd. 
Álom Sziget Entertainment Zrt. 
Álom Sziget Hungary Kaszinójáték Kft. 

Holding company 
Holding company 
Holding company 

Liquidated
50% held by Plasi Invest 2007 Ingatlanforgalmazó Kft.
50% held by Israeli-based partner
Új Udvar project
50% held by Plaza Centers N.V.
50% held by Hungarian commercial bank
87% held by Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.
Dream Island project
87% held by Ercorner Gazdasági Szolgáltató Kft.
49.99% held by DI Gaming Holding Ltd. – associate
100% held by Álom Sziget Entertainment Zrt.

CZECH REPUBLIC 

ACTIVITY 

REMARKS

Directly wholly owned 
Praha Plaza S.R.O. 
Plaza Housing S.R.O. 

INDIA 

P-One Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 

Logistic center 
Owns plot of land 

ACTIVITY 

Real estate 

Prague 3 project
Roztoky project

REMARKS

50% held by Spiralco Holdings Ltd.
50% held by Indian third party
Kharadi Plaza and Trivandrum Plaza projects

152

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

Kragujevac Plaza, Serbia

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

153

 
N
O

I

T
A
M
R
O
F
N

I

L
A
N
O

I

T

I

D
D
A

Company’s 
offi ces

Plaza Centers The Netherlands

Plaza Centers Serbia

Plaza Centers N.V.

Prins Hendrikkade 48-S

1012 AC Amsterdam

The Netherlands

Phone: +31 20 344 9560

Fax: +31 20 344 9561

E-mail: info@plazacenters.nl

www.plazacenters.com

Lazarevacˇka street no 1/5

11000 Senjak, Belgrade

Serbia

Phone: +381 11 715 1577

Fax: +381 11 715 1587

E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.rs

www.plazacenterserbia.rs

Plaza Centers Hungary

Plaza Centers Czech Republic

David House

Andrássy út 59.

1062 Budapest

Hungary

Phone: +36 1 462 7100

Fax: +36 1 462 7201

E-mail: info@plazacenters.com

Plaza Centers Poland

Marynarska Business Park

Ul. Tas´mowa 7,

02-677 Warsaw

Poland

Phone: +48 22 231 9900

Fax: +48 22 231 9901

E-mail: headoffi ce@plazacenters.pl

www.plazacenters.com/pl

Plaza Centers Romania

63-81 Calea Victoriei

Building I1, Entrance B2, District 1

010065 Bucharest

Romania

Phone: +40 21 315 4646

Fax: +40 21 314 5660

E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.ro

Palachova 1404

460 90 Liberec

Czech Republic

Phone: +420 485 104 110

E-mail: offi ce@plazacenters.cz

www.plazacenters.cz

Plaza Centers Latvia

71 Mukusalas

LV-1004 Riga

Latvia

Phone: +371 67 633 734

Fax: +371 67 633 735

E-mail: offi ce.latvia@cbre.com

www.rigaplaza.lv

Plaza Centers India

Labban, 3rd Floor

40 Vittal Mallya Road

560 001 Bangalore

Phone: +91 80 4041 4444

Fax: +91 80 4041 4469

www.plazacenters.in

154

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A
D
D

I

T

I

O
N
A
L

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T

I

O
N

Advisors

Investor relations

FTI Consulting
Holborn Gate
26 Southampton Buildings
London WC2A 1PB
United Kingdom
www.fticonsulting.com

Financial advisors and stockbrokers

UBS Investment Bank
1 Finsbury Avenue
London EC2M 2PP
United Kingdom
www.ubs.com

Financial advisor

Spark Advisory Partners Limited
5 St John’s Lane
London EC1M 4BH
United Kingdom
www.sparkadvisorypartners.com

Principal auditor

KPMG Hungária Kft.
Váci út 99.
H-1139 Budapest
Hungary
www.kpmg.hu

Dutch statutory auditor

Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman Accountants N.V.
Mazars Tower – Delfl andlaan 1
PO Box 7266
1077 JG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.mazars.nl

Tax counsels in the Netherlands

Loyens & Loeff N.V.
Fred. Roeskestraat 100
1076 ED Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Web: www.loyensloeff.com

Corporate solicitors in the UK

Mayer Brown International LLP 
201 Bishopsgate
London EC2M 3AF
United Kingdom
www.mayerbrown.com

Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP
Adelaide House
London Bridge
London EC4R 9HA
United Kingdom
www.blplaw.com

Corporate legal counsels in the Netherlands

Buren N.V.
World Trade Center, Tower A Level 10, 
Strawinskylaan 1017
1077 XX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.burenlegal.com

Corporate legal counsel in Poland

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Warsaw Financial Center
ul. Emillii Plateer 53
Warsaw 00-113
Poland
www.weil.com/warsaw

Registrar

Capita Asset Services
The Registry
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent BR3 4TU
United Kingdom
www.capitaassetservices.com

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

155

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
156

PLAZA CENTERS N.V. ANNUAL REPORT 2013

Casa Radio, Romania

DESIGNED AND PRODUCED BY RESTYÁNSZKI DESIGN STUDIO

PLAZA CENTERS N.V.

Prins Hendrikkade 48-S

1012 AC Amsterdam

The Netherlands

Phone: +31 20 344 9560

Fax: +31 20 344 9561

E-mail: info@plazacenters.nl

www.plazacenters.com